No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrails and Bicycle Master Plan (2007-2009)RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Adopted May 11, 2009 Prepared by: MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects Connie Reckord and Kristen Lohse Transportation Engineering Northwest Michael Read, P.E. Andrew R. Goulding AIA SEGD, Signage Consultant RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN May 2009 Adopted May 11, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Denis Law, Mayor City Council Members Randy Corman, Council President Don Persson, Council President Pro Tem Terri Briere Marcie Palmer King Parker Greg Taylor Rich Zwicker Renton Parks Commission Tim Searing, Chairperson Cynthia Burns Al Dieckman Mike O’Donin Ron Regis Larry Weymann Troy Wigestrand Renton Non-Motorized Transportation Committee Pete Maas, Chair Janene Sestak, Vice-Chair Bob Elliot Margaret Feaster Dorothy Flower Jean Hobart Craig Paynter Robert Peterson Frances Pieper Paul Wantzelius City Administration Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Leslie Betlach, Parks Director Todd Black, Capital Project Coordinator Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Peter Hahn, Deputy Public Works Administrator–Transportation Jim Seitz, Planning and Programming Supervisor Dan Hasty, Civil Engineer 1 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................3 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Vision Statement................................................................................................................9 Overview and Purpose.....................................................................................................11 Growth Management Act..................................................................................................11 Project Process................................................................................................................12 Public Outreach................................................................................................................13 Public Input ......................................................................................................................14 Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................15 PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS The Setting.......................................................................................................................19 Destinations and Trip Generators ....................................................................................21 Existing Trails and Bicycle Facilities.................................................................................23 Planning Area Evaluations and Opportunities..................................................................27 PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS Routing ............................................................................................................................39 Evaluation Criteria & Methodology...................................................................................41 Cross Sections.................................................................................................................43 Design Standards.............................................................................................................55 Recommended Improvements and Prioritization .............................................................56 Recommended Improvement Maps ................................................................................59 Recommended Improvement Tables...............................................................................63 Signage Recommendations.............................................................................................73 PART 4: BACKGROUND, PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW Review and Summary of Previous Plans and Policies.....................................................83 City of Renton.......................................................................................................83 Regional Level......................................................................................................88 State Level............................................................................................................91 TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS ..........................................................................................93 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................................95 PROJECT SHEETS ....................................................................................................................97 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................161 2 City of Renton APPENDICES , Listed individually.............................................................................................161 A. City of Renton Resolution No. 4005 (May 11, 2009)................................................163 B. Table 3. Master List of Existing and Proposed Improvements and Routes..............167 C. What We’ve Heard: Summary of Public Comments, Open House #1 ....................175 D. What We’ve Heard: Summary of Public Comments, Open House #2 ....................179 E. Public Open House #3: Public Comments..............................................................183 F. 2004 Draft Trails Plan Routes and Status................................................................189 G. Puget Sound Regional Council Destination 2030 Update, Appendix 9: Projects (July 24, 2008).................................................................193 H. 1-405 Corridor Improvement Program Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects: Bike and Pedestrian Improvements (January 24, 2005).............................................................................................205 I. City of Renton Public Works and Transportation Systems Division 2009-2014 TIP ...................................................................................................209 J. Non-motorized Funding Sources..............................................................................213 K. City of Renton Parks, Schools, and Trails (January 2008).......................................221 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Project Process..................................................................................................11 Fig. 2. Geographic Planning Areas...............................................................................21 Fig. 3. 2006 Aerial Photo ..............................................................................................22 Fig. 4. “Ped Shed” ........................................................................................................23 Fig. 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facilities ...........................................25 Fig. 6. Sample Evaluation Matrix ..................................................................................42 Fig. 7. General Guidelines for Selecting Cross-Sections..............................................43 Fig. 8. Types of Cross Sections....................................................................................44 Fig. 9. Proposed Trails and Bikeways Improvements...................................................59 Fig. 10. Proposed Trails and Bikeways Improvements—Downtown...............................61 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Draft Prioritized Matrix of Recommended Improvements ............................63-66 Table 2. Recommended Improvements, by Division..................................................67-72 Table 3. (Appendix A) ...................................................................................................161 3 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map Project is a comprehensive update of the City of Renton Trails Mas- ter Plan, adopted in 1993, and the Draft Trails Plan, produced by the Citizen’s Non-motorized Transportation Committee in 2004. It represents a collaborative effort between the Trans- portation and Parks Divisions, and reflects the desire to cre- ate an interconnected trails, water trails, and non-motorized transportation network to accommodate both recreational and commuting uses, from pedestrians to cyclists. The project was initiated in 2006 with the receipt of a federal grant. The Master Plan provides a vision statement, goals and ob- jectives, and a review of policy at the local, state, and federal levels. It reviews existing conditions of the non-motorized system through the City, identifies new destinations and their service areas, and from this seeks to identify new projects and routes that are incomplete. Facility design guidelines are reviewed and current standards are proposed. A final project list is included, as well as project sheets for most routes. Cri- teria are developed and used to create a list of prioritized im- provements for each division. The following paragraphs summarize the content of each section. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW, PART 1 The first task of the project was to develop a vision state- ment, goals and objectives to define and guide the project and provide the foundation for the plan: The Bicycle and Trails Master Plan creates and fos- ters opportunity within Renton and neighboring com- munities for people to move through the city and to access multiple local and regional destinations includ- ing schools, parks, businesses and residential ar- eas. The master plan supports a city where residents and visitors can enjoy recreation and exercise contrib- uting to a healthy lifestyle, and where commuting by bicycle using an integrated trails/road network, be- comes a realistic transportation alternative. Project objectives and goals help to further articulate the vi- sion by providing more specific direction and guidance for actions implementing the vision. CURRENT CONDITIONS, PART 2 Inventory and analysis of existing conditions was gathered in a variety of ways. Base mapping was acquired from the City via the King County GIS Center, which had recently produced 4 City of Renton a walking map for the Burien, SeaTac, Tukwila and Renton area. Field reconnaissance was performed across the City to confirm current non-motorized facilities, transit routes, routes that are currently used by bicyclists, and destinations. Addi- tional research on destinations, general conditions, and facili- ties was done using the City’s CAD data, resources provided on the City’s website, and King County’s Bicycling Guide Map and Regional Trails Map. In addition, public comment was invaluable, gathered from e-mails to City staff and discussion during the project’s four public open houses. The inventory was structured according the geographic plan- ning areas used by the City’s Open Space and Recreation plan: Central, West, Southwest, Southeast, and North and East. Inventory and analysis reveal that existing bicycle fa- cilities in the City are limited and are not contiguous, and many of the routes proposed in the earlier plans remain in- complete. The Cedar River Trail is the longest non-motorized facility in the City, and because of its central location within the City, can therefore be seen as the spine of the City’s trails and bicycle network. Pedestrian facilities, in the form of soft- surface trails, are more numerous, especially along other ri- parian corridors: the Black River, Springbrook Creek, Honey Creek, May Creek, Thunder Creek, and Soos Creek, though these trails are not all continuous or complete. A number of significant barriers to bicycle and pedestrian travel were identified: the steep topography between down- town and the neighborhoods, the limited crossing points of the Cedar River, Interstate-405, Sunset Boulevard/SR 900 and some other busy arterials. In particular, the lack of con- nections between downtown in the river valley and the neighborhoods above, due to the steep topography, are seen as critical connections to make, especially with multiple em- ployment centers in both downtown and the nearby Green River Valley. In addition, connections between the regional trails-- the Interurban/Green River Trail corridors, Lake Wash- ington Loop and the Cedar River Trail—are seen as essential links to be made. Public comment echoed the importance of these connections. RECOMMENDATIONS, PART 3 The recommendations section describes how routes are identified, selected, and prioritized, as well as how cross- sections are determined for the routes. Primary, secondary, and minor routes are developed, based on previously pro- posed routes and the survey of existing conditions and oppor- tunities, to ensure connections between all identified destina- tions and to serve the range of trips Rentonians make on foot or bike. 5 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Identification of routes as primary, secondary, or minor does not necessarily target them as priority projects, but helps en- sure a high level of connection between facilities and destina- tions. A set of criteria for evaluating, selecting, and prioritizing routes for the final master plan were developed. The criteria are as follows: Safety Accommodation/Accessibility Continuity & Directness Connectivity/Linkage Regional Trail Connectivity Trail Experience Sensitivity Concurrency Funding/Construction Opportunities. Design Guidelines and Cross-Sections The design guidelines are intended to direct the construction of trail and bicycle facilities presented in the plan, and still allow some flexibility in implementation. The design guide- lines are based on recognized regional, state and national standards and/or guidelines and include dimensional recom- mendations for widths, separation of elements, and signage. The range of options includes bike lanes, signed shared roadways, paved shoulders, multi-use trails, and separated multi-use trails. Recommended Improvements Existing trails and bicycle facilities in Renton, including re- gional trails, bike lanes, signed shared roadways, and multi- use trails comprise nearly 26 miles. Over 60 existing and proposed routes were identified, including critical connections to regional trails. Additions to the City’s non-motorized net- work as proposed in the recommended improvements are as follows: Proposed trails and bicycle facilities and approximate mileage: Separated multi-use trails, for bikes and pedestrians (paved) 3.2 miles Multi-use trails, for pedestrians only (unpaved) 12.2 miles Mixed cross-sections on the same route (e.g. bike lanes + multi-use trail) 9.5 miles Regional trails 9.7 miles New bike lanes 26.0 miles Extended bike lanes (including existing segments) 14.1 miles Signed shared roadways 21.8 miles TOTAL MILES PROPOSED TRAILS AND BICYCLE FACILITIES: 96.5 miles 6 City of Renton BACKGROUND/PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW, PART 4 This review of previous plans and policies includes local, re- gional, state and national levels. The previous trail plans are reviewed, as are local plans of relevance to the City’s non- motorized network. Of most consequence are the documents at the regional level: possible improvements to several corri- dors passing over or under I-405 as part of the I-405 Corridor Improvement Project; possible rail to trail conversion of the BNSF rail line through Renton; and the King County Regional Trail Plan, which identifies several regional trails with connec- tion into and through Renton. PROJECT SHEETS, PART 5 A set of project sheets is included to provide more detail on proposed projects and selected existing routes. PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 9 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan VISION STATEMENT The Bicycle and Trails Master Plan creates and fosters opportunity within Renton and neighboring communities for people to move through the city and to access multiple local and regional destinations including schools, parks, businesses and residential areas. The mas- ter plan supports a city where residents and visitors can enjoy recrea- tion and exercise contributing to a healthy lifestyle, and where com- muting by bicycle using an integrated trails/road network, becomes a realistic transportation alternative. 10 City of Renton 11 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE In 2006 the City of Renton’s Transportation Division received a federal grant to produce a bicycle route map and future bi- cycle route plan for the City and the potential annexation ar- eas. Within the same time frame the City of Renton’s Parks Division was in the process of hiring a consultant to update their trails planning document. Instead of having two docu- ments, one for bike routes and one for trails, the City of Ren- ton’s Transportation and Parks Divisions have combined their resources to create this integrated and comprehensive plan- ning document that ties together the Parks Division’s recrea- tion-oriented trails, paths, and sites and Transportation’s bike route facilities. The most recent Parks trails planning document was adopted by Council in 1993, and an updated draft completed in 2004 in conjunction with the Non-motorized Transportation Advi- sory Committee. While progress has been made on the im- plementation of the adopted plan, major new developments, particularly in the City’s core, have made the need for an up- date evident. Furthermore, there are more cyclists on the road today, as people recognize the health benefits of cycling for both recreational and commuting purposes, as well as the potential relief from traffic congestion and rising energy costs. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The 2005 Amendments to Washington State’s Growth Man- agement Act (GMA) mandates the incorporation of bicycle and pedestrian planning into each jurisdiction’s comprehen- sive plan, as well as the consideration of approaches that promote physical activity. The recommendations of the Master Plan, when adopted, will be an implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Beyond compliance with state mandates, the value of non- motorized planning is evident to most communities in the Puget Sound region for the multiple benefits it provides: flexi- bility in transportation choice, congestion relief, health bene- fits, fun, and enhanced livability for communities. The unique combination and configuration of Renton’s geo- graphic setting, land use patterns, transportation network, and recreational opportunities set the stage for the develop- ment of a well-connected network of trails and bikeways. Renton’s central location within the Puget Sound region, in- terconnection with, and easy access to, the region’s motor-Pedestrian sign off Lake Washington Boulevard North Springbrook Trail Cedar River Trail The Landing, under construction 12 City of Renton ized transportation system, and the presence/existence of major employment centers centrally located within the City, make it a readily accessible place to live, work, and play. Unique natural resources like the Cedar River, Lake Wash- ington, and proximity to the Green River Valley and Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park also make it an excellent recreational destination. Perhaps most significantly, the City is the hub of three major regional trails: the Cedar River Trail, the Lake Washington Loop, and the Interurban Trail, providing Renton direct access to over 80 miles of regional trails. Tying these resources together through a network of trails and bikeways, as this Master Plan outlines, will ensure that Renton remains “ahead of the curve” in terms of livability by creating an accessible, sustainable, and pleasant place to live, work, and play. PROJECT PROCESS The Master Plan was developed through a process that com- prised five main tasks: 1. Information Review and Preliminary Documentation: The first task entailed a planning and regulatory investiga- tion of policies at federal, state, and local levels as well as relevant local and regional plans and proposals. A set of guiding principals for the development, design, and imple- mentation of the trails and bicycle network was also de- veloped during this task. 2. Existing Conditions Evaluation: The second task consisted of an inventory of existing con- ditions and opportunities; assessment of traffic or trip gen- erators and destination service areas; and analysis of travel corridors, including soft-surface hiking and walking trails. This information was presented to the public at the project’s first open house. 3. Routing Options & Evaluation Criteria The third task involved transportation planning analysis and identification of route options; designation of pro- posed routes and cross-sections; and establishment of evaluation criteria for designating priorities. A second open house was conducted to get the public’s input at this stage of the process. 4. Draft Master Plan & Bicycle-Friendly Routes Map The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan document was drafted during this fourth task, incorporating information from the THE TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Builds on previous non-motorized plans Goes beyond previously proposed routes to look at the big picture: policy, plans, and proposal at both the local and the regional scale 13 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan two open houses and finalizing the recommendations. Two maps were created during this task; one showing existing trails and bicycle routes and a second map show- ing proposed routes. In addition a signage plan comple- menting the proposed routes and safety flyer were cre- ated. A third public meeting for the project was con- ducted, to share the Draft Master Plan and recommenda- tions to the public and get their feedback. 5. Final Master Plan and Bicycle-Friendly Routes Map Completion of the Master Plan included final evaluation of the recommended routes and the development of project sheets for selected routes. The signage elements were also finalized during this task, along with the bicycle- friendly routes map, which features safety information for cyclists. PUBLIC OUTREACH Public input and participation in the Master Plan process was a valuable resource for on-the-ground information and overall validation of the project. As described above, the project conducted three public meetings, described in greater detail below. Public Open House #1: The purpose of this first public open house was to further develop the inventory of destinations, identify all potential trail and bikeway routes, confirm existing conditions and opportunities, refine the program, and listen to concerns. The project team solicited comments from the community to supplement other inventory and research, and aid the team in evaluating corridors and options. Presentation graphics included goal statements, existing conditions maps, aerial photographs, and site images. Public Open House #2: The second open house included a presentation of the route options, evaluation criteria, cross sections, and other improvements. The goal of the meeting was to solicit comments from the public on the alternatives and seek consensus on a preferred network of routes. Com- ments from these meetings were incorporated into the Draft Trails and Bikeways Plan. Public Open House #3: The draft plan recommendations were presented and public comment sought. Figure 1. Project Process 14 City of Renton PUBLIC INPUT Attendance at each of the open houses was between 20 and 40 attendees. Participants were able to offer their comments to the team during both presentations and working sessions, and comment forms and maps were available for those wish- ing to leave written comments. In addition, a brief project de- scription and contact information for City staff were posted on the City’s website, and a number of comments were received via e-mail to City staff. The majority of comments were neighborhood-specific— routing recommendations and ideas for improvements, as well as trouble spots and missing links. A fair number of bicy- clists who commute into and out of Renton, as well as recrea- tional cyclists, made varied recommendations for regional- scale routes between Renton and its neighboring jurisdic- tions. On the whole, the public conveyed enthusiasm and support for the project and its recommendations. In addition to the public outreach, presentations by City staff and the project team were made throughout the project to the Parks Commission, Non-motorized Transportation Advisory Committee, City Council, and the Mayor. 15 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Master Plan was developed in collaboration with both Transportation and Parks staff, reflecting the desire to create an interconnected network to accommodate both recreational and commuting uses, from pedestrians to cyclists, and im- prove mobility for non-drivers. With these concerns in mind, project goals and objectives were developed to guide the pro- ject. Project Objectives Enhance public awareness about the benefits of walk- ing, cycling and recreating for the individual and com- munity health. Create a safe and convenient trails and bikeways net- work to provide both local and regional connectivity in order to increase bicycling and trail use. Interconnect neighborhoods and local destinations: schools, parks, shopping, civic sites, and other local destinations, emphasizing route safety for less skilled riders/users. Develop commuting routes between neighborhoods, employment and business centers, and transit facili- ties that will accommodate more skilled riders/users. Capitalize on the convergence of the Lake Washing- ton Loop, Cedar River Trail and Interurban Trail in Renton and enhance the connectivity of the regional trail network by creating connections to proximate re- gional trails: the Green River Trail, Soos Creek Trail, Lake Youngs Trail, and the East Lake Sammamish Trail, as well as neighboring communities. Increase use of hiking and water trails, parks and other recreational sites. Promote bicycle safety, especially on shared road- ways, by increasing awareness among the driving public. Update policies, ordinances and procedures to make opportunities for walking and bicycling. Introduce cycling skills into school curriculum. 16 City of Renton Project Goals Identify local and regional destinations in a non- motorized network, for both commuting and recrea- tional purposes. Inventory and evaluate existing non-motorized routes, hiking and water trails. Identify missing links in the existing network to con- nect important destinations and complete routes. Identify connections to regional trails. Identify and provide signage for a preferred network of routes. Identify safety issues on existing and proposed routes. Develop a methodology to prioritize improvements. Ensure accommodation of a wide variation in users and trip purposes: pedestrians and all types of bicy- clists: long distance and “fast” cyclists, recreational, less-skilled riders, and children. PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS 19 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS THE SETTING Renton is located on the south shore of Lake Washington, where the Cedar River flows into the lake. The central part of the City and its older neighborhoods lie in the level area south of the lake, while the rest of the City is spread out on the slopes of Lake Washington, and hillsides above the Ce- dar and Green River Valleys, and Honey, May, and Panther Creeks. The river valleys and plateaus are generally fairly level, and the roadways leading between these two distinct topographical areas are steep. The population is roughly 80,000, and the city’s footprint on the landscape is just over 20 square miles. The City is centrally located within the Puget Sound environs, and is well connected to the rest of the region via Interstate 405, and State Routes 167 (Valley Freeway), 169 (Renton Maple Valley Road), 515 (Talbot Road/Benson Drive South), and 900 (Sunset Boulevard/SE Renton-Issaquah Road). As is often the case with major limited-access transportation corridors, these routes divide the City into distinct areas and pose significant barriers to non-motorized travel due to the great traffic volumes and limited crossing opportunities. In particular, I-405, and SR 167, as well as the Cedar River, de- marcate distinct neighborhood/planning areas and limit ac- cess to non-vehicular traffic Several major local arterials, however, run north-south, and provide alternative access to Seattle, Bellevue, Kent and points beyond. Rainier Avenue North, Lake Washington Boulevard and Duvall Avenue are all popular bicycle routes for both commuters and recreational cyclists. Renton is also well served by regional and local buses, through a hub-based transit system based at the downtown transit center. The RUSH (Renton Urban SHuttle) transports commuters from downtown Renton to the City's major em- ployment sites. Sounder Commuter Rail and Amtrak ser- vice, via the current temporary and planned final Tukwila Sta- tion at the Renton/Tukwila City line, make easy connections to Seattle’s King Street Station and other points north and south. This well-established transit network provides an ex- cellent opportunity to create and enhance linkages with the non-motorized network, thereby increasing the efficiency and usage of both modes of travel. 20 City of Renton DESTINATIONS AND TRIP GENERATORS The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is about getting people where they want to go. A thorough analysis of where people are coming from and where they need and want to go, there- fore, lays the framework to create a highly connective non- motorized and recreational network. The determination of important destinations, neighborhood conditions and charac- ter, topography, natural features, and existing travel patterns and recreational routes are all part of this analysis. As a means of organization, the Master Plan uses the geo- graphic planning areas designated in the 2003 Park, Recrea- tion and Open Space Implementation Plan, updated to reflect current annexations. The areas are divided by the most sali- ent natural and manmade boundaries and for the most part form distinctive and fairly cohesive units in terms of topogra- phy, land use, and transportation networks. The City’s 6 identified planning areas, as shown in Figure 2, are: Central Planning Area Southwest Planning Area Southeast Planning Area North Planning Area East Planning Area West Planning Area The project limits for the Master Plan are Potential Areas of Annexation (PAAs), to accommodate potential future annexa- tions. Employment Centers Renton is unique in that it has many major employers cen- trally located in or not far from the central business district. Some of the major employers are: Central Planning Area (Urban Center Downtown, Ur- ban Center North): Boeing, PACCAR, Fry’s Electron- ics, The Landing, including Target, Lowe’s, and other “big box” retail, Renton Municipal Airport, Renton City Hall. Southwest Planning Area (Valley): Green River Val- ley/Renton industrial area: Boeing Longacres, Valley Medical Center, IKEA, and various industrial, ranging from light to heavy. East Planning Area: Sunset, East Renton, The High- lands The Landing under construction Cedar River Park and Trail 21 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan The advantage of these centrally-located employers is the greater potential for residents to walk or bicycle to work, and these routes should be capitalized on. Parks and Recreation The City of Renton has a variety of parks, recreation sites and open space resources, both natural and developed that are important destinations for its citizens. In addition to de- veloped parks, recreation sites, and open space, the City has a number of open spaces that are linear in character, provid- ing excellent opportunities for bicycling, walking, and hiking, and boating (water trails). Among these linear open spaces are: Lake Washington, the Cedar River, May, Honey, Spring- brook and Panther Creeks, in addition to several utility corri- dors that are currently used or have potential use for walking, hiking, and bicycling. Some highlights of the City’s parks, recreation and open space system: 12.5 miles of existing trails Two lake-front beaches along Lake Washington (Gene Coulon and Kennydale Beach) Many park/recreation/civic sites, including: ○ A community center (at Cedar River Park) ○ Two library branches (downtown and in the High- lands) ○ An historical museum (downtown) ○ A sports park complex (Ron Regis Park along SR 169 and the Cedar River Trail) ○ A skateboard park ○ An 18-hole public golf course ○ A central downtown park/Transit Center ○ A senior center (on the Cedar River). Schools Safe, convenient connections to schools are a primary build- ing block of a non-motorized network. Aside from the fact that children and most older students are non-drivers, schools are the one destination that are very often close enough to homes to enable walking or biking. Renton has over 20 schools. With an area of about 20 square miles, that equates roughly to a school in every square mile of City. In terms of walkable catchment area (or “ped shed”), deter- mined as the area encompassed in a 5-10 minute walk, (see Figure 4), that puts many schools in walkable or cycling range of many of Renton’s citizens. Figure 2. Geographic Planning Ar- eas (from 2003 Park, Recreation, and Open Space Implementation Plan Figure 3. 2006 Aerial Photo 23 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Organizations like the National Center for Safe Routes to School attest that safe non-motorized routes provide multiple benefits, from personal and public health to reducing vehicle miles traveled, providing traffic calming and enhanced neighborhood livability. See Appendix K for map of Renton schools. Other destinations Some other notable destinations in Renton, both for its citi- zen’s and for the larger regional community include: Black River Riparian Forest Henry Moses Aquatic Center IKEA Renton Civic Theater Renton History Museum Renton IKEA Performing Arts Center Renton Technical College CARCO Theater Farmer’s Market Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park See Figure 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facili- ties. EXISTING TRAILS AND BICYCLE FACILITIES The Cedar River Trail, the keystone of the City’s non- motorized network, runs through the heart of the City and of- fers both a rural and urban experience for both pedestrians and bicyclists. Across the City, existing trails, mostly soft- surface or rough (undeveloped) along the City’s numerous creeks and utility corridors, provide ample walking trails for pedestrians. The situation for bicyclists is different. Bike lanes are few and nearly always discontinuous (not linking to other bike lanes or non-motorized facilities), as are separated multi-use trails. Some signed shared-use roadways exist, but often are not contiguous with other bicycle facilities. Below is an inventory of existing non-motorized facilities in and around Renton. “PED SHED” Defined as the walkable area around an origin or destination Walkable area is considered to be ¼ to ½ mile, the distance most people are willing to walk in 5-10 minutes It takes the average able-bodied person about 15-20 minutes to walk one mile Figure 4. Figure 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facilities 25 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAILS: Cedar River Trail also listed below under “Creeks and Greenway Corridors,” (pedestrian-only section be- tween North 6th Street and the Lake Washington Shoreline) Burnett Avenue South, Burnett Place South (Burnett Linear Park) Garden Avenue North and North 8th Street Trail (along PACCAR property) Ripley Lane Strander Boulevard Springbrook and Soos Creek Trails, also listed below under “Creeks and Greenway Corridors” SW 27th Street BIKE LANES: SW 16th Street west of Oakesdale Ave SW Oakesdale Avenue SW Monster Road SW Duvall Avenue NE Rainier Avenue North (alongside Renton Municipal Airport) Lake Washington Boulevard North, north of Gene Coulon Memorial Park Logan Avenue North 140th Ave SE (King County) NE 4th/SE 128th Street (Renton and King County) Talbot Road South (south of 43rd Street) DESIGNATED SHARED USE ROADWAYS: Airport Perimeter Road Taylor Avenue NW and Hardie Avenue SW CREEK AND GREENWAY CORRIDORS: Cedar River Trail Honey Creek Trail Black River Trail Springbrook Trail (multi-use) May Creek Greenway Soos Creek Trail (multi-use) WATER TRAILS—LAUNCH AND LANDING SITES (Lake to Locks Water Trail) Cedar River Boathouse Gene Coulon Park Cedar River Trail Park Riverview Park Burnett Avenue South SW 27th Street 26 City of Renton UTILITY CORRIDORS: PSE right-of-way through SE Renton, the “Tower of Power” trail system (informal walking and mountain biking trails) Seattle-Mercer Island Waterline Right-of-Way “PACCAR Trail” along Garden Avenue North and North 8th St. Black River Riparian Forest trailhead, Naches Avenue SW 27 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan PLANNING AREA EVALUATIONS Area character and Issues Transit Routes Existing Bicycle and Walking Routes Opportunities Central Planning Area Renton’s Central Planning area is a diverse area that in- cludes the central business district (downtown), an industrial area, and a residential neighborhood. The area is bounded by I-405 to the south and east, Lake Washington to the north, and Rainier Avenue North (SR 167) to the West, and is tran- sected by the Cedar River. The street pattern of the industrial area, home to major em- ployers The Boeing Company and PACCAR, is an elongated grid, with some large industrial parcels. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway tracks run along the east and west edges of the area, serving the industrial areas. The topogra- phy is flat. Some of the area is transitioning to commercial use, with big-box retail and mixed-use development through The Landing and Southport developments. The evolution of the area from industrial to a mix of retail, commercial, and residential land uses will bring more bicyclists and pedestri- ans to the area. Downtown Renton has a gridded street pattern with walkable block sizes, and has an economic vitality with small shops, businesses, and restaurants. Two pairs of one-way couplets provide through access through downtown, South 2nd and South 3rd Streets (SR 900 through downtown), running east- west, and Williams and Wells Avenues South, running north- south. Two distinctive features of the area: the BNSF rail corridor which passes through downtown in southwesterly- northeasterly direction, and Burnett Avenue South (also a former rail corridor) which runs north-south and forms a di- vided boulevard with park blocks in between. Also notable are the centrally located Piazza Park and Renton Transit Center. At the northern-most part of downtown lays the Renton Mu- nicipal Airport, Renton High School and the IKEA Center for the Performing Arts, forming larger blocks. The single-family residential neighborhoods are south of downtown and between the Cedar River and the industrial area to the north. The street network is a continuation of the downtown street grid, and there are four streets that bridge the river (Logan, Williams and Wells Avenues North and Bronson Way North). Boeing and The Landing under con- struction 28 City of Renton Waterfront Safe, convenient north-south non-motorized access around Lake Washington is lacking despite the fact that this makes up part of the Lake Washington Loop, an important and heav- ily-used regional bicycle route. The area between the inter- section of the Airport Perimeter Road/Logan Avenue North and Gene Coulon Park is a missing link in the regional trail network. A separated multi-use trail linking the east and west shores of Lake Washington would provide the most benefit to bicyclists and pedestrians. However, large industrial parcels and their access needs (by roadway and rail), existing river crossings, substantial north-south traffic volumes, and the basic physical constriction of space make this a challenging area for non- motorized improvements. In terms of river crossings, the Boeing Bridges, the northern at the mouth of the river and the southern near North 6th Street are permitted through State Department of Natural Re- sources to Boeing, and the permit restricts use by others. The bridges’ purpose is to allow airplanes to be hauled be- tween the Boeing Renton Plant and the Municipal Airport. The Logan Avenue Bridge has a narrow separated lane for pedestrians, but its width, approaches, and grade separation from the Cedar River Trail below make it a poor choice for bicyclists. Downtown As mentioned above, connections between regional trails are best accomplished with separated multi-use trails. Given that downtown Renton is probably the most fully built-out area of the city, flexibility and creativity will be required to achieve this aim. In addition, as the center of the City’s commerce, parking is obviously a critical need, and something that is hugely valued by merchants. Squeezing non-motorized improvements into the existing urban fabric of downtown will also require creativ- ity, and likely some trade-offs. Downtown improvements in the bicycle and pedestrian net- work have the potential to bring great benefit to the City, in- cluding increased transit use; possible reductions in vehicle trips and demand for vehicular parking; and significantly, in- creased commerce. Such enhancements would likely boost the City’s visibility, reputation and allure throughout the re- gion. Cedar River Trail at Logan Avenue North Bridge South 3rd Street, downtown 29 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS: Cedar River Trail (bicycle access ends north of North 6th Street) Houser Way North (southbound and northbound) Garden and Park Avenues North Lake Washington Loop Trail (parallel to I-405 west of Ripley Lane) Burnett Avenue North (Burnett Linear Park) SW Grady Way various other low volume streets TRANSIT ROUTES: South 2nd and South 3rd Rainier Avenue South South/SW Grady Way South/SW 7th Street Park Avenue North Bronson Way North Park Avenue North/NE Park Drive OPPORTUNITIES: Lower-volume streets (some one-way) such as Wil- liams, Wells, Garden, parallel the main north-south routes, Logan and Park Avenues, and could provide good non-motorized access and connections. North 3rd, 4th, 6th Streets as east-west routes. Possibility of grade separation between pedestrians and bicycles via street right-of-way that parallels the Cedar River Trail and the bank above the river (North Riverside Drive). Potential availability of Renton High School property adjacent to Logan for a segment of separated trail. The eventual need to upgrade the Logan Avenue Bridge and include a dedicated bike-pedestrian trail. Possible redevelopment of the BNSF rail corridor. Long-term redevelopment of Liberty Park, as identi- fied in the Tri-Park Master Plan, providing a potential opportunity to install new pathways around the pe- rimeter of the park. A route for the Two Rivers Trail, utilizing SW 7th/South 7th Street (see West Planning Area, below), Shattuck Avenue South, and Houser Way South, with the fol- lowing additional opportunities: Potential near-term and/or long-term redevelopment of Houser Way and the BNSF corridor. Low-volume Shattuck Avenue South as another direct thoroughfare through downtown. Ped/Bike Lane, Logan Avenue North Bridge Piazza Park, downtown South 2nd Street & Renton High School 30 City of Renton Burnett Avenue South as a core pedestrian route. Connection with transit via the Renton Transit Center. The Williams and Wells Avenues South one-way cou- plet as a direct thoroughfare through downtown. Downtown bicycle and pedestrian amenities: wayfind- ing signage, information kiosks, benches, access to restrooms, etc. Southwest Planning Area The Green River Valley makes up most of Southwest Renton. It is bounded by the Valley Freeway (SR 167) on the east, Renton/Tukwila City limits on west (also the Interurban Trail and Green River), Martin Luther King, Jr. Way/SW Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) to the north, and SW 43rd and the Renton City limits to the south. The area has flat topography and consists mostly of large industrial-zoned parcels, with a rectilinear street pattern. The area also features a network of wetlands, along Springbrook Creek and the Springbrook Trail. The Southwest Planning area, with its recently redeveloped streets; proximity to existing passenger rail and future light rail (via Tukwila Station), regional trails in neighboring Tuk- wila, and the Springbrook Trail is one area where non- motorized transportation is gaining a foothold. Existing bike lanes in the area connect together, as well as to the Black River and Springbrook Trail, providing access to recreational resources, walking trails, and Tukwila Station, and regional bike commuting routes. EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS: SW 16th (bike lanes and signed shared roadway) SW 27th (separated shared use trail, west end) Oakesdale Avenue SW (bike lanes) Springbrook Trail The Interurban Trail TRANSIT ROUTES: Lind Avenue SW SW 16th Street SW 43rd Street Renton Transit Center Black River Riparian Forest trailhead, Naches Avenue SW 31 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan OPPORTUNITIES: Extension of SW 16th signed shared roadway to con- nect with transit route on Lind Avenue SW. Extension north and south of Oakesdale Avenue SW bike lanes to connect with the Springbrook Trail. Planned Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street connec- tion between Renton and Tukwila. Connections with Tukwila’s non-motorized routes. Missing links within the Springbrook Trail System. West Planning Area The West Planning area is bounded by the Renton City Limits to the north and west (bisected by Martin Luther King, Jr. Way/SW Sunset Boulevard/SR 900), I-405 to the south and Rainier Avenue/SR 167 to the east. It is the smallest planning area, and its most notable feature is the Black River Riparian Forest, a remnant riparian forest with walking trails and a heron rookery, surrounded by industrial parcels. The indus- trial area is south of SW Sunset Blvd/SR 900, and is criss- crossed by railroad corridors and spurs. North of SW Sunset Blvd/SR 900, a residential neighborhood rises above the city on the hillsides of the Green River Valley. The hilly terrain of this area poses access challenges: both getting to and from downtown and points north as well as get- ting around the neighborhood. Unlike other areas of the City, the existing street network does not have a regular and ex- tensive system of collectors and arterials providing through- access. Industrial area The industrial area south of SW Sunset Boulevard/SR 900 has excellent potential to provide connections between the Green River, Interurban and Cedar River regional trails, be- tween Tukwila and Renton, and to make connections with downtown Renton, particularly through the railroad corridors. The trail in Black River Riparian Forest and the Springbrook Trail and bikes lanes on Monster Road already provide some connectivity. Extending the east-west connection would be ideal. In terms of the connection of existing regional trails; there is an excellent opportunity to close the missing link between the Green River Trail and Renton via railroad right-of-way and Fort Dent Park. The “Fort Dent Connector,” which would link the Green River Trail to Renton, has been identified in sev- eral regional non-motorized planning documents as a high priority connection. Linkages between regional trails, and this Houser Way South, west of Burnett Avenue South SW 7th Street 32 City of Renton connection in particular, were also identified through public comment at project open houses. A multi-use trail to the Black River Riparian Forest, adjacent to the existing railroad and connected to SW 7th via Naches would make connections to the east. The SW 7th corridor has a lot of potential, preferably as a separated multi-use trail and could become an excellent connection to downtown. Neighborhoods This area is hilly, making it challenging for bicycle access, even on the designated shared use routes, Hardie and Tay- lor. The major arterial in the area is Renton Avenue South, which is considered moderately bicycle friendly along some of its length. EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS: Monster Rd SW (bike lanes) SW 7th Street Black River Trail (walking trail) Springbrook Trail (multi-use trail) Taylor and Hardie Avenues SW (shared use) TRANSIT ROUTES: MLK Jr. Way South/SW Sunset Blvd (SR 900) SW 7th Street SW Grady Way OPPORTUNITIES: Two Rivers Trail (see Central Planning Area, above). Fort Dent Connector to connect the Green River Trail and Renton. Conversion of undeveloped path alongside railroad corridor in Black River Riparian area. Continuation of separated multi-use trail from Black River Riparian area down Naches to SW 7th. Possibility for a separated multi-use trail along SW 7th Street to connect to downtown. Extension north and south of Oakesdale Avenue SW bike lanes to connect with the Springbrook Trail. Renton Avenue South as a connection to Seattle. Future extension of Chief Sealth trail through the util- ity corridor. Green River at Fort Dent Park Taylor Avenue Northwest Monster Road SW near Waterworks Park 33 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Southeast Planning Area (Talbot/Benson/Fairwood/ Soos Creek) Steep hillsides rise up from the Green River Valley and Cedar River corridor. The southeast planning area sits above these two rivers, and borders on downtown. It is bounded by the Valley Freeway (SR 167) on the west, I-405 to the north, the Cedar River to the northeast, and Renton City limits to the south and east. The terrain is hilly and is transected by utility corridors: Puget Sound Energy transmission lines and the Seattle-Mercer Is- land Waterline. The area is predominantly residential, with some commercial/retail nodes along the arterials. Arterials curve, sometimes in response to topography, and are some- what discontinuous; local streets form inwardly-focused neighborhood units. On the northeast side, The Cedar River Natural Area forms a sloped, wooded boundary between these neighborhoods and the Cedar River. Panther Creek and its wetland complex run parallel to SR 167 at the bottom of the west slope. Thunder Hills Creek flows toward I-405 and downtown from the southeast to the northwest. The area has several pockets of multi-family housing that would surely benefit from improved connections. The primary east-west route, SW 43rd Street/SE Carr Road/ SE 176th/Petrovitsky Road, though long, is steep in places and has a cross section that changes several times along its approximately 6-mile length. At the same time, multiple utility corridors in the area have the potential to provide miles of trails across the area. Pro- viding a balance of destination-oriented non-motorized facili- ties as well as recreational ones will be the challenge in Southeast Renton. There are several major north-south routes connecting to Kent and beyond: Talbot Road, Benson Road/108th Ave SE (SR 515), 116th Avenue SE, and 140th Avenue SE. EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS: Cedar River Trail (on north side of the river east of the Cedar River Natural Zone) 140th Ave SE (existing bike lanes) Benson Road South Puget Drive SE SE 164th Talbot Road South (existing bike lanes south of SW 43rd/179th/Carr Road SE Hiking/walking trails in Cedar River Natural Zone Benson Road South “Tower of Power” Trail near Philip Ar- nold Park 34 City of Renton TRANSIT ROUTES: 108th Ave SE 116th Ave SE Puget Drive SE SE 168th Street SE Carr Road SE Fairwood Boulevard SR 169 Renton-Maple Valley Road Talbot Road South OPPORTUNITIES: Expansion of existing soft-surface or rough path / trails in utility corridors. Connections with Cedar River Natural Area. Safe walk-to-school routes (Renton Park Elementary, Talbot Hill Elementary, Nelson Middle School, Cas- cade Elementary, Tiffany Park Elementary). Regional trail connections: Interurban and Green River Trails and Soos Creek Trail, Soos Creek and the Cedar River Trail, Lake Youngs Watershed Trail. Connections with Kent and points south via 116th Ave SE and 132nd/140th Ave SE. Panther Creek wetlands. Trail along Thunder Hills Creek. Trail along Panther Creek wetlands, connecting to the Edlund Property and onto the Springbrook Trail. Pedestrian trails from multi-family areas to shopping areas. Good overlap between transit and proposed non- motorized transit routes. North and East Planning Area (Kennydale/Sunset/East Plateau/Cedar River) Though two separate planning areas, divided by Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900, the North and East planning areas are grouped together for the purposes of this Master Plan be- cause they are more contiguous and interconnected than other planning areas. The East Planning area is bounded by Maple Valley Road (SR 169) to south, I-405 and Lake Wash- ington on the west, and Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900 to the north. The North Planning area is bounded by Lake Wash- ington to the west, Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900 to the south, the May Creek corridor/May Creek urban separator and Renton City Limits to the north, and the Renton City Lim- its to the east. The terrain is hilly and slopes steeply to Lake Washington on the west and the Cedar River to south. It is primarily residen- tial, with commercial retail nodes and along the arterials, es- Separated trail along 116th Avenue Southeast Bike lanes on Talbot Road South 35 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan pecially NE 3rd/NE 4th Street and NE Sunset Boulevard/SR 900. Like the South Planning Area, topography presents a chal- lenge to non-motorized travel in the North Planning Area, and currently limits connections between this area, downtown and Interstate 405 and its impact on nearby arterials and collec- tors also limit east-west access. The east-west routes, Sunset Boulevard NE and NE 3rd and 4th Streets, are busy commercial streets, with higher traffic volumes, higher speeds, and many access points into the strip-type commercial development lining the streets. How- ever, there are some routes parallel to these thoroughfares that can provide alternative access, even if these tend to be short, discontinuous segments. Multiple parallel north-south routes (Edmonds, Monroe, Union and Duvall Avenues NE) could make for a highly connective non-motorized network, and provide opportunities to connect with the area’s many civic resources. EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS: Lake Washington Loop Trail and Lake Washington Boulevard North bike/pedestrian facilities Cedar River Trail May Creek Trail Honey Creek Trail Edmonds, Monroe, Union, Duvall Avenues NE Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900) NE 3rd/4th Streets/SE 128th Street NE 12th Street 148th SE (connects to May Valley Road, May Valley Park, Hazen High School and Apollo Elementary) TRANSIT ROUTES: Renton-Maple Valley Road (SR 169) NE 3rd/4th/SE 128th Street NE Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) NE 27th Street Edmonds Ave NE Union Ave NE Duvall Ave NE/Coal Creek Parkway NE 7th Street NE 12th Street Busy corner on Sunset Boulevard NE Devil’s Elbow, along Honey Creek Trail Union Avenue NE Pedestrian path along NE 12th Street 36 City of Renton OPPORTUNITIES: NE 10th and NE 12th Streets as bypass routes to Sun- set Boulevard. Connections to good distribution of neighborhood parks. Connections to May and Honey Creek Trails, Cedar River Trail. Safe walk-to-school routes (Maplewood Heights, Hazen High School, McKnight Middle School). Existing trails and planned development of the Honey Creek, May Creek, and Kennydale Creek corridors. Good overlap between transit and possible non- motorized transit routes. Possible redevelopment of the areas as a result of the Highlands Subarea Plan. Connections to Bellevue, Newcastle and Issaquah. Several scenic longer rural routes: SE May Valley Road, SE Jones Road. Long term redevelopment of the BNSF railroad corri- dor. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad line along the shoreline of Lake Wash- ington SE May Valley Road PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS 39 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS ROUTING In developing Renton’s proposed non-motorized network, it was helpful to think about different categories of routes in or- der to ensure coverage to all kinds of destinations, as well as to determine which trail cross-section is most appropriate. Primary Routes Primary facilities provide regional connections through and within Renton. Because of the longer distances these facili- ties traverse, they will constitute the highest mileage of facili- ties in the system. Examples include the Lake Washington Loop and the Cedar River Trail, both of which are designated regional trails by King County. Primary facilities were selected based on the following crite- ria. The facility should: Provide continuous connection between major portals to the CBD/downtown/City Center when completed Serve and connect with the public transportation sys- tem Avoid high traffic arterials and state highways unless no other feasible direct connection exists Avoid roadways posted at speeds over 40 miles per hour unless no other feasible direct connection exists Avoid major hills whenever possible. Secondary Routes Secondary facilities provide subarea/neighborhood connec- tions meant to augment the primary trail system. Typically, they serve smaller commercial, residential, or employment centers, or locations that are not connected by primary facili- ties. As with primary facilities, these facilities may also cover longer distances. An example would be a trail in a utility cor- ridor. Secondary facilities should: Connect the CBD to neighborhoods, major parks, and recreation centers Provide alternative connections to areas served by the primary trail system if either of the following crite- ria apply: Provide a connection between two primary facilities that otherwise would not be connected TYPES OF ROUTES PRIMARY: through routes, connecting city to city SECONDARY: connecting neighborhood to neighborhood MINOR: connections within the neighbor- hoods 40 City of Renton Provide access to points of interest and scenic fea- tures/destinations that otherwise would not be served by the primary trail system. Minor Routes Minor routes connect residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, employment centers, parks, and specific activity cen- ter to the primary and secondary trail system, provide local connections within these areas, or connect these areas with other nearby locations such as schools. These facilities typi- cally cover shorter distances than either of the other types of facilities. Within this category there is the greatest opportu- nity for expansion, based on development patterns in the City. Encourage More Walking, Hiking and Biking According to a study by the Puget Sound Regional Council, about 5 percent of all trips made in the Central Puget Sound region are bicycle or walking trips, which is comparable to the national average. In Renton, 2.6 percent of commuting trips are made on foot or by bike. In order for Renton to meet the regional average of commuting trips made without cars, as well as to encourage healthier, more active lifestyles and boost recreation, the City must make primary, secondary, and local routes more accessible, and make them safer and more attractive to use on foot or on bike. Boost from Regional Connections On the regional scale, the completion of missing links, exten- sions, and new trail development would add approximately 30 more miles of trail in and around Renton, for a total of ap- proximately 112 miles of regional trail linkage in the City, which is about 63% of King County’s total system. Connection to the Green River Trail is possible through the completion of a half-mile missing link between Renton and Tukwila. A planned extension of the Soos Creek Trail to the Cedar River Trail and the development of the Cedar- Sammamish Trail from the Cedar River Trail to Sammamish will provide many additional miles of regional trail through Renton. 41 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria were developed to use as the basis for evaluating routes, determining the final selection of routes, the design and cross sections of the routes, and ultimately, as tools for prioritizing the trails for funding and construction. While all the criteria bear significant weight on planning deci- sions, first and foremost, trails and routes need to provide a safe experience for all user groups. The evaluation criteria are based on community needs, safe and efficient bicycle travel. The criteria are listed in proposed order of priority. Safety: The proposed facility should provide a safe trail experience. Accommodation/Accessibility: The proposed facility should serve the needs of the maximum number of user groups possible; both commuters and recreational users, young and old, pedestrians and cyclists. Some advocate accommodating differing travel modes, user abilities, and trip purposes through separate facilities--separating faster cyclists or equestrians from a primary trail meant to ac- commodate pedestrians and less-skilled or slower cy- clists. Continuity & Directness: The proposed facility should be continuous, clear and easy to follow, proceeding in the most efficient, and direct pathway possible. Cyclists tend to favor routes that require the least expenditure of their energy. In addition, navigability and ease of wayfinding are extremely important to bicycles and pedestrians. Connectivity/Linkage: The proposed facility should link destinations of all levels: neighborhoods, employment centers, schools, parks, shopping, recreation and enter- tainment facilities, public services, and destinations be- yond the city limits. In addition the facility should synchro- nize with transportation nodes and modes through the City, to facilitate multi-modal connections. Regional Trail Connectivity: The proposed facility should take advantage of the nexus of several regional trails in the area, connecting to and between these sys- tems to create an even larger network. Trail Experience: The proposed facility should provide a comfortable and appealing trail experience, and should take advantage of opportunities to follow scenic corridors and connect with scenic resources. In order of most de- sirable to least desirable, the following cross-sections are FACTORS AFFECTING SAFETY Potential for conflict with other trail users and vehicles, especially at crossings Traffic volume, speed, and type: smaller, passenger vehicles vs. larger vehicles (e.g. trucks and busses) Cross section or geometry of facil- ity: proximity to vehicular travel lanes, separation from vehicle lanes, width of facility, grade, sight distances, surfacing, etc. Perceived safety: overall sense of comfort with the facility FACTORS AFFECTING TRAIL EXPERIENCE Safety and comfort Perceived safety Trail volumes and types of users Noise, air pollution, traffic speeds and volume Scenery and scenic resources 42 City of Renton recommended: separated trail bicycle lanes, paved shoulders, signed shared roadway, and shared sidewalk. Sensitivity: The proposed facility should be designed to respect and avoid harm to wildlife corridors, critical areas, and other sensitive landscapes. Concurrency: The proposed facility should be concur- rent with other City, County and regional non-motorized planning efforts. Funding/Construction Opportunities: Identify opportu- nities to construct the proposed facility as part of other projects, such as the Transportation Improvement Pro- gram (TIP). METHODOLOGY The evaluation criteria above are listed in order of priority. The sample matrix in Figure 6 illustrates the evaluation meth- odology. The routes are evaluated by each criterion, using a simple to use scoring system. This methodology is designed to allow some flexibility and judgment. The final evaluation matrix (Table 1), which identifies projects and their ranking, is located at the end of Recommendations Section (Part 3). Figure 6. Sample Evaluation Matrix 43 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan CROSS SECTIONS The safety of the users of Renton’s trails and bicycle network can be enhanced by building facilities to a consistent stan- dard and maintaining all facilities adequately. The Master Plan includes a set of guidelines for cross sections as a com- panion to the recommended routes. The design guidelines provide a reference to the minimum acceptable construction criteria which will satisfy commonly accepted guidelines for safety. The cross-section guidelines are based on recognized state and national standards, described in the Design Standards section (page 55). Recognized state and national standards include dimensional recommendations for widths, cross- slopes, grades, surface treatments, separation of elements, signage and other elements that make up a new facility or system. They are intended to define minimum dimensional criteria for development of safe facilities functioning under normal conditions. Figure 7, adapted from Washington State Department of Transportation guidelines, recommends cross sections based on roadway classification, traffic speed and volume. In addition to safety and roadway factors, the assignment of cross sections is based on other factors, such as the con- straints of existing conditions and the desired trail experience (see sidebar). FACTORS FOR DETERMIN- ING CROSS SECTIONS Safety of trail/facility users Availability of right-of-way, on road vs. off road Location of destination, most direct route Type of trail experience desired Accommodation of different kinds of trail/facility users Character of roadway (traffic speeds and volumes, etc.) Constraints of existing conditions ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SPEED (ADT = average daily traffic) RECOMMENDED ON-ROAD CROSS-SECTION Highways and other high-volume streets with limited access Speeds > 25 mph ADT > 2000 1st choice: Shared use trail 2nd choice: 4’ min. shoulders, each side Arterials in residential, commercial, industrial areas with higher ac- cess needs 1st choice: Shared use trail 2nd choice: Bike lanes, each side GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR SELECTING CROSS-SECTIONS ON ROADWAYS Adapted from WSDOT Local streets, rural highways, Collector or minor arterials Speeds < 25 mph ADT less than 2000 Shared roadway Figure 7. Guidelines for Selecting Cross-Sections 44 City of Renton Figure 8, indicates that cross sections are categorized off- road or on-road. The individual cross sections are described below. Off-road Facilities Off-road facilities can offer a multitude of benefits: reduced potential for conflicts with motor vehicles, more spacious fa- cilities, scenic settings, direct access to open space and rec- reational facilities. There are two types of off-road facilities considered in this master plan: trails associated with road rights-of-way, and trails on other kinds of public or private lands. On-Street Facilities The beauty of the Renton’s street network is that it takes peo- ple where they want to go. And yet for bicyclists and pedes- trians, skill-level, physical ability, level of comfort, and avail- able time determine what route is best. The most direct route may not be the best for every user. While some bicyclists feel comfortable riding on streets without dedicated bicycle facilities, many cyclists do not. According to Bike Plan Source: “Experienced bicyclists often prefer arterials for their traffic controls and directness. Other riders tend to avoid them, if possible, because of the traffic. . . Arterials . . . may be the only streets that break certain barriers like railroad yards, freeways, and rivers. But arterials increasingly provide other benefits to cyclists as well. In suburban areas, for example, many popular destinations--schools, worksites, shops--can only be found along arterials. For destination-oriented bicy- clists, therefore, using arterials may be the only alternative.” TYPES OF CROSS SECTIONS OFF-ROAD FACILITIES ON-ROAD FACILITIES Multi-use Trail Bicycle lanes Separated Multi-use/ Shared Use Trail Paved shoulder Signed shared roadway Figure 8. Types of Cross Sections 45 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan A combination of the facilities described below will be em- ployed on busier roadways like arterials, as well as local and collector streets to create a trail and bicycle network in Ren- ton that will accommodate a wide range of users’ comfort and skill levels. MULTI-USE TRAIL This cross-section applies to corridors that are not associated with road rights-of-way. The design of the trail is wide enough to accommodate two-way shared usage by bicyclists and/or pedestrians. Surfacing options include asphalt concrete, Portland cement, gravel or soft-surface. The latter is pre- ferred if hiking of the trail is expected. Examples of off-road trails would be stream, utility, or railroad corridors. MULTI-USE TRAIL at a glance ● Not necessarily associated with road right-of-way: could be stream, utility, railroad corridor, park or open space ● 1 and 2-way travel ● Width: 3’ minimum, 6-8’ preferred, shoulder on each side where trail abuts steep slope ● Surfacing varies 46 City of Renton HIKING ONLY TRAILS Certain trails are designated for pedestrian and hiking only. These soft-surface trails vary in width, but are primarily two to four feet wide. Examples of hiking only trails are May and Honey Creeks, and an example of pedestrian only is the boardwalk on Springbrook Creek. WATER TRAILS The Lake-to-Locks Water Trail is a day-use trail with over 100 public places to launch and land small non-motorized boats in the midst of vibrant Pacific Northwest communities. The lakes of the Lake-to-Locks are Sammamish, Washing- ton, and Union. The locks of the Lake-To-Locks Trail are the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks where fresh water meets salt wa- ter. This is one way to reach the Cascadia Marine Trail on Puget Sound. Water launches from Renton can take place from the Cedar River and numerous locations along the shoreline of Lake Washington. 47 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan SEPARATED MULTI-USE/SHARED USE TRAIL at a glance ● Facility in the right-of-way yet physically separated from traffic by open space or a barrier ● 2-way travel ● Width: 10’ minimum, 12’ preferred + 2’ shoulder on each side = 14’ or 16’ total 5’ minimum separated from roadway Surfacing varies ● Not always preferred by more skilled cyclists, commuters SEPARATED MULTI-USE (OR SHARED USE) TRAIL In areas where the road right-of-way is wide enough, a two- way separated trail for shared usage is possible. As with the off-road trail cross-section, surfacing options include asphalt concrete, Portland cement, gravel, or soft-surface. Sepa- rated trails provide greater separation from noise, traffic fumes, and are typically preferred by less-skilled cyclists who do not feel comfortable maneuvering along traffic or who want to travel at lower speeds. According to The Pedestri- ans and Bicycling Information Center, Shared use paths are an addition, and complimen- tary, to the roadway network: they are not a substi- tute for providing access to streets and highways. In the past, some communities have treated the development of a shared use path as the only thing they needed to do to "provide for bicyclists" and give them somewhere to ride. However, even the most extensive trail network cannot provide access to all the origins and destinations in a community, and trail users have to be able to get to and from the trail on the regular street network. 48 City of Renton 49 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan BICYCLE LANES The bicycle lane cross section accommodates cyclists in a designated striped lane and pedestrians either in the shoul- der or on a sidewalk in the case of a curbed roadway. For reasons of safety, bicycle lanes are always one-way facilities traveling in the direction of traffic designated for the exclusive use by bicyclists. BICYCLE LANES at a glance 1-way facilities traveling in the direction of traffic, usually on both sides of roadway Exclusive use by bicyclists Width: 5’ minimum to curb face or guardrail, 4’ minimum with- out curb and gutter 13 feet: shared bike lane and parking area, without curb face 14 feet: shared bike lane and parking area with a curb face Paved surface denoted with pavement markings: 4” or 6” solid white line demarcating bike lane, bicycle lane symbol (see Signage plans) 4” solid white line demarcating parking area Bike lane symbol (6’ high) and directional arrows should be painted on the far side of each intersection 50 City of Renton 51 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 52 City of Renton SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY at a glance ● Bicyclists share roadway with motorists for safety, wayfinding, or other purposes ● No change to roadway configuration required, though routes are often designated with signage and other measures to give bicyclists priority or enhance their safety and comfort ● Usually on lower volume, speed roadways/local streets. ● Signage: every ¼ mile, or at every turn SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY When right-of-way widths and existing roadway conditions prohibit the addition of dedicated bicycle facilities, a roadway can be designated for shared use by motorists and bicyclists. Typically, this design solution is used on roadways with low traffic speeds and low levels of traffic or with wide curb lanes (i.e. 14 feet minimum). Signed shared roadways may provide a safer alternative to travel on busier parallel routes; direct cyclists toward particular destinations, such as parks, schools, shopping areas; or may serve as a link between dis- continuous segments of dedicated bicycle facilities. Because signed shared roadways are often local streets, they may not necessarily be the most direct route. Ideally, signed shared roadways give bicyclists more priority in traffic maneuvers. The WSDOT Design Manual recommends the following crite- ria be used in determining whether to sign a bike route/ shared roadway: The route offers a higher degree of service than alter- native streets The route provides for through and direct travel in bi- cycle corridors The route connects bicycle facilities Traffic control devices have been adjusted to accom- modate bicyclists Street parking is prohibited for improved safety where lane width is critical Surface hazards to bicyclists have been corrected Maintenance of the route is at a higher level than comparable streets, such as more frequent street sweeping and repair. 53 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 54 City of Renton PAVED SHOULDERS at a glance ● For use by bicyclists and pedestrians + stopped vehicles, emergencies ● Width: 5’ minimum with curb and gutter, 4’ minimum without curb and gutter ● Widths should be increased with higher bicycle use, motor ve- hicle speeds above 50 mph, higher percentage of truck and bus traffic. SHARED SIDEWALK at a glance Generally not advised, except for special circumstances: bridges, high speed/high-traffic roadways ● Bicyclists must yield to pedestrians PAVED SHOULDERS Paved shoulders are for shared use by bicyclists and pedes- trians. In traffic situations shoulders are often used by stopped vehicles and for emergency uses. Even so, a paved shoulder goes a long way to enhancing the corridor for use by bicyclists and pedestrians. In addition to minimum width, paved shoulders should be free from obstructions and have a reliably smooth surface, without rumble strips. SHARED SIDEWALK A shared sidewalk cross-section allows cyclists to share the sidewalk with a pedestrian. This cross-section is considered a last resort solution in isolated situations such as across bridges and along high speed and high-traffic roadways, which lack adequate right-of-way for the provision of bicycle lanes, but have existing sidewalks. On sidewalks, bicyclists are expected to yield to pedestrians and walk their bicycles if sidewalks are particularly narrow. Both the shared roadways and shared sidewalk cross- sections are included among the alternatives as a means to fill in gaps at difficult locations. Neither is considered an opti- mum solution and both are avoided where possible. COMBINED CROSS-SECTIONS Certain conditions, such as right-of-way limitations, traffic vol- umes, environmental conditions, etc. may preclude the con- sistent use of a single cross-section along a route or street. While consistency is generally the preference, it is preferable to have a facility that uses a combination of cross-sections rather than no facility at all, or one that ends abruptly. 55 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan IMPLEMENTATION OF CROSS SECTIONS It is recommended that, at the project design level, each pro- ject be reassessed to determine the appropriateness of the suggested improvements, and to determine the available right-of-way, etc. Moreover, it is also critical for the Master Plan to have some flexibility in the designation of cross-section. In the evolution of the planning process, certain assumptions were made about existing conditions, road locations in the right-of-way, condition and location of utilities, etc. When the project is finally in the development phase, a topographic and right-of- way survey will provide the first clear picture of the actual conditions of the route, and it may be necessary to implement a different design solution or combination of design solutions than are shown in the Master Plan. In addition, there may be development of other capital projects or changes in funding strategies that dictate a different cross section or facility clas- sification than the one currently identified. DESIGN STANDARDS AASHTO GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FACILITIES This manual of design standards is recognized nationally as the “industry standard for development of bicycle facilities.” All of the design guidelines included in the recommendations section of this plan will meet the minimum standards articu- lated in the AASHTO document. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines This manual identifies specific design standards related to bicycle and pedestrian facility installations. These standards are referenced in the design guidelines. KC Regional Trails Inventory & Guidelines According to the King County Trails website, “the King County Regional Trail System is one of the nation's most ex- tensive multi-use off-road systems with over 175 miles of trails for bicycling, hiking, walking, and horseback riding.” King County Regional trail guidelines are closely aligned with the AASHTO guidelines but are intended to create and unify the regional network by standardizing regional trail design elements, based on the concerns of safety, convenience, aesthetic experience, and economical maintenance. The quality and connectivity of local non-motorized networks varies, but the King County system is the backbone of recrea- 56 City of Renton tional and commuting use across the region. Some King County regional trails see as many as 2,000 users a day. As such, the regional trail standards are designed to accommo- dating a large number and variety of users in a safe, efficient and enjoyable manner. FUNDING The City of Renton includes a Bicycle Route Development Program in the annual Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is adopted annually by the City Council. The 2009-2014 TIP (Appendix I) has programmed $448,000 to implement projects identified in the Trail and Bi- cycle Master Plan. The funding can be used for planning, design and construction phases of the projects as well as for local matches for state and federal grants, as identified in Ap- pendix J. Although it may not be the primary purpose of a particular project or program, many TIP projects have the po- tential to assist in implementing projects within the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) provides matching grants for trail acquisition and de- velopment, and is open to local and state agencies. Under the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP), eligible projects range from long-distance, cross-state rail-trail conversions to small paths connecting neighborhoods or to other trail systems. Grant applications are received on even calendar years. In 2007, King County voters approved Proposition 2, which includes expanding the regional trail system over a six year period, with the last distribution to cities ending in 2013. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS & PROJECT PRIORITIZATION The recommended trails and bikeways improvements are shown in Figure 9 (city-wide) and Figure 10 (downtown area detail). Tables 1 and 2, following the recommended improvements maps, is the prioritization matrix for the recommended im- provements evaluated on the criteria described earlier in this chapter, and described in the sample evaluation matrix (figure 6). These projects are organized from highest to lowest priority on the basis of their ranking among the criteria. The table identifies each project by location and cross-section. Follow- ing the prioritized matrix is a listing of recommended improve- ments broken down by Parks and Transportation divisions. 57 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan The complete inventory of proposed recommendations and existing facilities can be found in Appendix B, organized al- phabetically. The inventory identifies each route by location, length, proposed cross section, etc. IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIORITIZED PROJECTS Conditions and priorities in all communities change over time. Therefore the entire project list should be periodically re- evaluated. This review should be completed by a group in- cluding residents, committee members, City staff, and others to assure it reflects the needs and desires of the community at large. Reevaluation may involve changes as significant as redefining routes or as minor as shifting project priorities. Maintaining flexibility and responsiveness to the community’s concerns and desires will assure long-term success and con- tinued growth of the system. Finally, opportunities for trails and bikeways development may arise (through property acquisition, grant approval, con- currence with other projects, public support, etc.) that could shift project priorities. This list should be reviewed and up- dated periodically as project implementation progresses. PROJECT SHEETS A selection of proposed improvements have been detailed as project sheets, which can be found at the end of the Master Plan. 58 City of Renton NEWCASTLE MERCER ISLAND KENT BELLEVUE TUKWILA SEATTLE Southcenter Pkwy51st Ave SN E 44t h St Lake W ashington Blvd N N 30th St N E P ar k Dr112th Ave SE108th Ave SENEwcas 123rd Ave SEIsland Crest WayS 240th StE James St 164th Ave SE4th Ave NS 151st St S E Jones RdTalbot Rd SSW 16th StWilson Ave 144th Ave SES E 141st StWells Ave SSE 142nd StS 143rd St Williams Ave S154th Ave SES 196th St S 134t h S t Park Ave NSE 128th St B ron son W a y N S 2nd St S La k e R idge D rN E S u n s e t B l v d 80th Ave SS 112th St Monroe Ave NENE 12th St Strander Blvd SW 27th St SE Fairwood Blvd SE 164th St SE 80th St Co a l Cr eek Pkwy SE138th Ave SE112t h Pl SESE Renton Issaq u a h Rd B e a c o n A v e S M L Ki n g J r Wa y SSW Langston Rd 168th Ave SES 3rd St Hardi e Ave SWSE 136th St 175th Ave SESE 136th St Rainier Ave S178th Ave SESE 137th St Whitworth Ave SMorris Ave SMain Ave SS W Sunset Blvd 169th Ave SEUnion Ave SEMacadam Rd S68th Ave SShattuck Ave S156th Ave SEN 1 st S t Airport WayS 132nd St N E 3 r d S t S 133rd St Factory Ave NTaylor Ave NWMeadow Ave NGarden Ave NSouthcenter Blvd Interurba n Ave S61st Ave SN 40th St Ra i n i e r Av e S57th Ave SN Park D r L a k e Washi ngton Bl vd NC orn e ll Ave S196th Ave SE62nd Ave S64th Ave SS Prentice St 148th Ave SESE 2 0 4 t h W a y S 208th St 108th W ay SEBenson Dr SS 212th St NE Sunset BlvdN E 10th St R ainier A v e S Aberdeen Ave NEPark Ave NM L King Jr Way SKenn e wi ck Pl Wa t e r s Av e S Burnett Ave N132nd Ave SER e n t o n A v e S NE 27th St 51st Ave SSE 192nd St116th Ave SE116th Ave SESE Renton Maple Valley Rd149th Ave SE154th Pl SE128th Ave SESE Petrovitsky Rd Benson Dr SESE 176th St SW 41st St65th Ave SS 21st St 140th Wa y SE 140th Ave SE51st Ave S53rd Ave STalbot Rd SSW 7th St S 7th St S E 1 4 2 n d P l74th Ave SGarden Ave NHouser Way NN 8th St 148th Ave SES Rya n WayCoal Cr eek Pkwy SEFor est Dr SE SE 68th S 224th St SE 224th St84th Ave S83rd Ave SUnion Ave NES 129th St Williams Ave NN 4th StWells Ave N84th Ave S64th Ave STayl or Pl NWNE 4th StEdmonds Ave NEDuvall Ave NENE 4th St Nile Ave NES 196th St Renton A v e S Ma p le V alley H wy SE 168th StRainier Ave N124th Ave SESE 208th St 196th Ave SE116th Ave SE87th Ave SNE 7th S t68th Ave SS 124th St S 124t h St Stevens Ave NWN 6th St Monroe Ave NERenton Av e SSunset Blvd NELakemont Blvd SENEwcastle Golf Club Rd SE 240th St 148th Ave SEAndover Park EAndover Park WS 1 8 0th St Oakesdale Ave SWSW 43rd St Lind Ave SWS 180th St E Valley RdS 43rd St SE Carr R dS Bangor St NE 16th St SE May Valley Rd S 228th St S 228th St E M ercer W ay132nd Ave SE164th Ave SE78th Ave SN 3rd StLogan Ave NS 130th St Bron son W a y N E Sunset Blvd NS Langston RdGateway D r SHouser Way N108th Ave SESW 34th StMinkler Blvd 116th Ave SERenton Ave SSeward Park Ave SSE 216th St 98th Ave SS 218th St S W G r a d y Way M o n ster Rd SW68t h Ave SAndover Park EMacadam Rd S Burnett Ave S88th Ave SS 2 1 2th WayW Valley HwySE 72nd St SE 68th St W M erc er Wa y Union Ave NES E 88t h P l124th Ave SEPe ter Gr u b b Rd S E 84th Ave SE Benson Rd SS 200th St 148th Ave SESE Petrovitsky Rd84th Ave S68th Ave S132nd Ave SEEast Valley Hwy S196th Ave SETalbot Rd S177th Ave SESE 144th St58th Ave SS 147th St S G r a d y W a y60th Ave S62nd Ave STukwila Pkwy Puget Dr SPuget Dr SEMont er ey Pl NESE 192nd St SE 88th St SE 89th P l 192n114th A v e SESE May Valley Rd Be n s o n Rd SERussell R d S Lincoln Ave NES 17 8th St 108th Ave SE.%ND3T SE 1 7 1 s t W a y SE 176th St 92nd Ave S106th Ave SENE 10th St 3%TH3T 160th Ave SE     169    Maplewood Roadside ParkRiverview Park Coal Creek Park Kennydale Beach Park May Creek Greenway Hazelwood Park Glencoe Park Sierra Heights Park May Valley Park Kennydale Lions Park Sunset Court Park Bryn Mawr Park Lakeridge Park Honey Creek Greenway Maplewood Park Earlington Park Ron Regis Park Thomas Teasdale Park Talbot Hill Reservoir & Park Maplewood Golf Course Philip Arnold Park Kiwanis Park Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park Lake Youngs Park Renton Park DNR Property Springbrook Creek Metro Waterworks Park Renton Wetlands Cedar River Natural Area Cedar River Park Heritage Park Black River Riparian Forest Watershed Park (undevel) Springbrook Watershed Cleveland/ Richardson Property Panther Creek Wetlands Maplewood Park County Park Skyway Park May Creek Greenway May Creek Park May Creek Park Lake Boren Park Cascade Park Gene Coulon Park Fort Dent Park Foster Golf Course Tiffany Park Lake Youngs Watershed No Public Access North Highlands Park & Community Ctr Briscoe Meander Park Macadam Wetlands Park Minkler Pond Park Riverfront Park 57th Ave. S. Mini Park Hazelnut Park Ikawa Park Tukwila Pond Bicentennial Park Soos Creek Park and Trail Soos Creek Park and Trail Soos Creek Park and Trail Soos Creek Park and Trail Gleneagles Park Ballybunion Park Highlands Trails Heritage Morgan Park Forest View Park China Creek Open Space Windtree Park Tract A Park Clarke Beach Park Pioneer Park Donegal Park Thomas Rouse Road Historical Park China Falls Park Redman Park China Creek Park Tralee Park Cougar Ridge East Open Space Lake Youngs Trailhead Petrovitsky Park Lake Desire 2 Natural Area McGarvey Park Open Space Lake Street Park May Valley 164th Natural Area Coalfield Park Park Orchard Park North Meridian Park Lake Youngs Connector Trail Green Tree Park Garrison Creek Park Soos Creek 140th Open Space Lake Youngs Trail Beer Sheva Park Pritchard Island Beach Atlantic City Nursery South Mercer Playfield Interurban Trail Interurban Trail Fred Hutchinson Playground Kubota Gardens Park Anderson Park Green River Trail Site Liberty Park Windsor Hills Park Cedar River Trail Cedar River Park Van Dorens Landing Park Highlands Park & N’hood Ctr Cedar River Park Greenwood Memorial Park Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ped. only path Green River Trail Park CVAC Ballfield Edlund Farm Maplewood Heights Park Cedar River Boat House Lake Boren Green River Shady Lake (Mud Lake) Lake Desire Lake Youngs Lake W a s h i n g t o n Pant her LakeGreen RiverCe da r River Highlands Library Tukwila Library Fairwood Library Skyway Library Seahawks Training Facility F.S. Valley Med. Ctr N. Benson Ctr F.S. Dept. of Licensing F.S. Fred Meyer Renton Ctr City HallSam’s Club Fairwood Square Greater Highland Ctr ST Sounder Sta. Post Office Thomson Early Childhood Center Sartori Education Center Hillcrest Special Services Center Highlands Elementary Emerson Elementary Renton Christian Academy Bryn Mawr Elementary Tukwila Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Newcastle Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Rainier View Elementary Kennydale Elementary Meeker Middle School Benson Hill Elementary Talbot Hill Elementary Nelsen Middle School Hazelwood Elementary Renton Park Elementary Cascade Elementary Fairwood Elementary Maple Valley Christian Black River High School Tiffany Park Elementary Saint Paul School Lakeridge Elementary Campbell Hill Elementary Honeydew Elementary Sunrise Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Maplewood Heights Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Renton Memorial Stadium Apollo Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sierra Heights Elementary Mcknight Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary South Lake High School Rainier Beach High School Oliver M Hazen High School Renton Technical College Renton High School Liberty High School Charles A Lindbergh High School Kentridge High School Maywood Middle School Briarwood Elementary School -ULTI USETRAIL 2EGIONAL -ULTI USETRAIL ,OCAL "ICYCLE,ANE 3IGNEDSHAREDROADWAY 0EDESTRIAN ONLYTRAIL &UTURERAILS TRAILSCORRIDOR 02/0/3%$2/54%3 %8)34).'2/54%3 -ULTI USETRAIL 2EGIONAL -ULTI USETRAIL ,OCAL "ICYCLE,ANE 3IGNEDSHAREDROADWAY 0EDESTRIAN ONLYTRAIL ,EGEND &REEWAY !RTERIAL3TREET ,OCAL3TREET  0ARK 3CHOOL 3TATE(WY)NTERSTATE&WY !MENITY/PPORTUNITY,OCATION-!03#!,%ˆ  MILE ©³¬MILE  KILOMETER . 7% 3 3/52#%#ITYOF2ENTON +ING#OUNTY')3#ENTER -AY 3EE$OWNTOWN )MPROVEMENTS0LAN 7ATER4RAIL,AUNCH,ANDING3ITE 4RAILSAND"ICYCLE)MPROVEMENTS0LAN -!9 4RAILSAND"ICYCLE-ASTER0LAN Tal bot Rd SWells Ave SWilliams Ave SBronson W ay N S 2nd St S 3rd St Har di e Av e SWRainier Ave SWhitworth Ave SMorris Ave SMain Ave SShattuck Ave SN 1 st St Airport Way Factory Ave NTaylor Ave NWMeadow Ave NGarden Ave NS. 7th St Williams Ave NN 4th StWells Ave NN 6th St N 3rd StLogan Ave NSunset Blvd NHouser Way NBurnett Ave SS G r a d y W a y ONE WAY ONE WAYONE WAYONE WAYONE WAYONE WAY ONE WAY S. 6th St Smithers Ave SHouser N R iv ersid e D r S. Tillilcum S. Tobin St Lake Ave SS. 5th St S. 4th Pl S . 3 r d P l S. 4th St N 2nd St ONE WAY SW 7th St Shattuck Ave S405 405 Gateway Park Piazza Park Cedar River ParkPedestrianParkRenton Senior Center Cedar River Trail Veterans Park Jones Park Liberty Park Burnett Linear Park Tonkin Park Ced a r R i v e r T r a i l Cedar River Renton Main Library Fred Meyer Renton Ctr Renton City Hall Sam’s Club Renton Historical Museum Renton IKEA Perf. Arts Ctr Safeway City Ctr Parking Old City HallFire Station Post OfficeSt. Anthony School Sartori Education Center Renton Memorial Stadium Renton High School Renton Christian Academy SOURCE: City of Renton, King County GIS Center, May 2007 MAP SCALE 0 1 mile.5.1 ¼½¾0 1 mile 0 1.0 kilometer.5.1 N W E S Multi-use trail, regional Multi-use trail, local Bicycle Lane Signed shared roadway Pedestrian only trail Future rails-trails corridor PROPOSED ROUTESEXISTING ROUTES Paved trail, regional Paved trail, local Bicycle Lane Signed shared roadway Pedestrian only trail Legend Trails and Bicycle Improvements Plan: Downtown MAY 2009 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan RENTON TRAILS & BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TABLE 1. PRIORITIZATION MATRIX FOR RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Evaluation Key TRAIL/ROUTE NAME Proposed routes only FROM TO PROP. CROSS SECTION SAFETYACCOMMODATION/ ACCESSIBILITYCONTINUITY/DIRECTNESSCONNECTIVITY/LINKAGEREGIONAL TRAIL CONNECTIVITYTRAIL EXPERIENCESENSITIVITYCONCURRENCYFUNDING OPPORTUNITIESNOTES, Possible Funding Sources HIGHEST PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS 1a-1g TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Fort Dent Connector, Black River Riparian Forest, Naches Ave SW, SW 7th Street, Shattuck Ave South, Houser Way South Green River Trail Cedar River Trail SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED 333333123 KC, TIP 1, 2, 12, 14 2 SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Black River Trail/Monster Road SW SW 43rd Street SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE (COMPLETE) 332233111 3 MAY CREEK TRAIL Lake Washington Blvd North Cougar Mountain County Park SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE 322233111 4 PANTHER CREEK TRAIL Cleveland Richardson Property Lake Street Park SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE 321222122 I-405 Congestion Relief, TIP 5 5 HONEY CREEK TRAIL Honey Creek/May Creek confluence Union Avenue NE SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE 322223111 6 DEVIL'S ELBOW Edmonds Avenue NE Duvall Avenue NE/Coal Creek Parkway MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) + BICYCLE LANES 233332323 7 DUVALL AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES SE 136th Street/ Maplewood Hts Elem. Coal Creek Parkway/ Northern City Limits BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING)233332323 TIP 3, 4, 5 8 LIBERTY PARK CONNECTOR Cedar River Trail Bronson Way North/ Factory Avenue North SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED 332333322 TIP 12, 14 9 SAM CHASTAIN WATERFRONT TRAIL Cedar River Trail Gene Coulon Park MULTI-USE TRAIL, BOARDWALK 323333133TIP 11 10 NE 3rd AND 4th STREET BICYCLE LANES Logan Avenue North Eastern City Limits SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) 223332333 TIP 9, 18, 19, WS PBP 11 TUKWILA STATION/ LONGACRES WAY CONNECTOR (South Grady Way and Longacres Way SW) Oakesdale Avenue SW Tukwila Station SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + BICYCLE LANES 333332322 TIP 12, 14 12a-12b LAKE WASHINGTON LOOP: AIRPORT PERIMETER ROAD & LOGAN AVENUE NORTH West entrance to Airport Park Avenue North BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXIST. SOUTH OF NORTH 6TH STREET) + MULTI- USE TRAIL BETWEEN 6TH AND CEDAR RIVER. 222232333 TIP 11 13 SE PETROVITSKY ROAD BICYCLE LANES Tukwila/Green River Trail and Interurban Trail Petrovitsky Park BICYCLE LANES 223332322 TIP 1, 2; WS PBP 14 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH & NORTH 6th STREET BICYCLE LANES Cedar River/ Cedar River Trail North 3rd Street BICYCLE LANES 233332333 TIP 1, 2, 18. 19; STP MPO Alloc. 15 CASCADE TRAIL AND SW 27th STREET CONNECTOR Oakesdale Avenue SW & SW 27th Street Puget Drive SE SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + BICYCLE LANES 233232332 Tukwila/ Renton Project Negative or Insufficent Info.Somewhat Positive Strongly Positive 12 3 63 Evaluation Key TRAIL/ROUTE NAME Proposed routes only FROM TO PROP. CROSS SECTION SAFETYACCOMMODATION/ ACCESSIBILITYCONTINUITY/DIRECTNESSCONNECTIVITY/LINKAGEREGIONAL TRAIL CONNECTIVITYTRAIL EXPERIENCESENSITIVITYCONCURRENCYFUNDING OPPORTUNITIESNOTES, Possible Funding Sources Negative or Insufficent Info.Somewhat Positive Strongly Positive 12 3 16 NE 7th STREET BIKEWAY NE Sunset Blvd Monroe Avenue NE SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332322 17 NE 10th STREET BIKEWAY NE Sunset Blvd 164th Ave SE SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 233332313 I-405 Congestion Relief; STP MPO 18 OAKESDALE AVENUE SW BICYCLE LANES SW 7th Street SW 43rd Street BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING)223332322 TIP 1, 2 19 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH LINEAR AND PEDESTRIAN PARK South 7th Street Cedar River Trail SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 323323312 STP Enhancements 20 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH BICYCLE LANES SW 7th Street Renton City Limits (southwest) BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING)223332322 TIP 1, 2 21 EDMONDS AVENUE NE BIKEWAY NE 4th Street NE 27th Street SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223322311 22 BENSON DRIVE SOUTH/ SR 515 BICYCLE LANES South Grady Way SE 192nd Street BICYCLE LANES 223332311 23 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE BIKEWAY Williams Avenue North Bronson Way North SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332311 24 BENSON ROAD SOUTH/MAIN AVENUE SOUTH BIKEWAY South 2nd Street SE Carr Road/SE Petrovitsky Rd BICYCLE LANES 223322322 I-405 Congestion Relief MEDIUM PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS 25 SOUTH 2nd AND 3rd STREET BIKEWAY Rainier Avenue South Bronson Way SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332311 26 FACTORY AVENUE NORTH BICYCLE LANES Bronson Way South North 4th Street BICYCLE LANES 223332322 27 116th AVENUE SE BICYCLE LANES Puget Drive SE City Limits (south) SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) + BICYCLE LANES 333212312 Safe Routes to Schools 28 LAKE - TOBIN - SHATTUCK STREET BIKEWAY Airport Perimeter Road Houser Way South SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 222322322 TIP 1, 2, 11 29 WILLIAMS & WELLS AVENUE BIKEWAY South Grady Way N. 6th St SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332311 30 LAKE TO CREEK CONNECTOR Lake Washington Blvd North Edmonds Avenue NE/ Honey Creek BICYCLE LANES 223332322 TIP 1,2 31 SEATTLE WATERLINE TRAIL Cedar River/ Riverview Park Lake Youngs Watershed SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE 322232111 32 SEATTLE WATERLINE SPUR Cedar River/ Riverview Park 161st/ 131st Ave NE SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE 322232111 33 NE 12th STREET BIKEWAY Edmonds Avenue NE Union Avenue NE SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 233323311 34 NE SUNSET BLVD/ SR 900 BICYCLE LANES NE 3rd/NE 4th Street SE May Valley Road BICYCLE LANES 222331323 TIP 1, 2; WS PBP 35 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL ROUTE Duvall Avenue NE to SE 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE SE 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 222322313 Safe Routes to Schools 36 LINDBERGH/RENTON PARK SCHOOL ROUTE 108th Avenue SE 128th Avenue SE (Renton Park Elementary) SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332212 Safe Routes to Schools 37 MONROE AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES NE 4th Street NE 12th Street BICYCLE LANES 223322322TIP 1, 2 38 SOUTH 3rd PLACE BICYCLE LANES Rainier Ave. South Shattuck Ave. South BICYCLE LANES 323321322TIP 1, 2 64 Evaluation Key TRAIL/ROUTE NAME Proposed routes only FROM TO PROP. CROSS SECTION SAFETYACCOMMODATION/ ACCESSIBILITYCONTINUITY/DIRECTNESSCONNECTIVITY/LINKAGEREGIONAL TRAIL CONNECTIVITYTRAIL EXPERIENCESENSITIVITYCONCURRENCYFUNDING OPPORTUNITIESNOTES, Possible Funding Sources Negative or Insufficent Info.Somewhat Positive Strongly Positive 12 3 39 GREEN RIVER TO LAKE YOUNGS CONNECTOR SR 167 (Kent/ Green River ultimately) Lake Youngs BICYCLE LANES 222332322 TIP 1, 2 40 140th AVENUE SE BICYCLE LANES Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) SE 208th Street BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING)231332311 WS PBP 41 PUGET DRIVE SE AND SOUTH 21st STREET BICYCLE LANES Panther Creek 116th Avenue SE and Beacon Way SE BICYCLE LANES/ CLIMBING LANES 223322322 TIP 1, 2 LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS 42 PARK AVENUE NORTH BIKEWAY North 30th Street North 40th Street/Lake Washington Blvd SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332311 43 FAIRWOOD- PETROVITSKY PARK BIKEWAY 140th Avenue SE Petrovitsky Park SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223332311 44 UNION AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES SE 95th Way Dead end (about SE 4th Street) BICYCLE LANES 223322322 TIP 1, 2 45 TAYLOR AVENUE NW & HARDIE AVENUE SW BIKEWAY Lake Washington Blvd North SW 7th St SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY (EXISTING)223322311 46 CHIEF SEALTH TRAIL Seattle City limits Renton City Limits (west) REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED 331132113KC 47 THUNDER CREEK TRAIL I-405 Puget Drive SE SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE 322222111 48 PHILIP ARNOLD PARK BIKEWAY Cedar Avenue SE Beacon Way South/ Puget Drive SE SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 222222311 49 SE 171st WAY BIKEWAY 140th Avenue SE SE 176th Street SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 223322311 50 CEDAR-SAMMAMISH TRAIL Cedar River at 154th Avenue SE Issaquah City Limits REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED 331332113 KC 51 SOOS CREEK TRAIL Cedar River Trail Lake Meridian REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED 332333113KC 52 SE MAY VALLEY ROAD BIKEWAY Lake Washington Blvd North Issaquah- Hobart Road SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 222233311 KEY TO POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES: (refer to Appendices G, H and I) CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program, MPO Allocation I-405 Congestion Relief WSDOT KC King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks - Regional Trails STP - Enhancement Surface Transportation Act, Enhancment Program STP - MPO Allocation Surface Transportation Act, MPO Allocation TIP City of Renton Transporation Improvement Program WS PBPB Washington State Pedestrian and Bicycle Program KC Prop 2 King County Proposition 2 RCO/Trails Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office Parks CIP City of Renton Parks Capital Improvement Project 65 RENTON TRAILS & BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES PARKS DIVISION - PRIORITIZED BY PROJECT 1a TWO RIVERS TRAIL: FORT DENT TRAIL CONNECTOR Fort Dent Park Monster Road SW 0.25 Soft-surface trail, rough, under railroad trestle SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED UP & BNSF ROW between Tukwila/ Ft. Dent Park/ Interurban Trail and Renton. Path follows Black River to its confluence with Green River 1b TWO RIVERS TRAIL: BLACK RIVER TRAIL Black River Riparian Forest Trailhead/ Monster Road SW Naches Avenue SW 0.9 Soft-surface trail, rough SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED Trail parallels railroad ROW 1c TWO RIVERS TRAIL: NACHES AVENUE SW Black River Riparian Forest Trailhead SW 7th St 0.2 Local street SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED 1d TWO RIVERS TRAIL: SW 7th STREET Oakesdale Avenue SW Burnett 1.3 Minor arterial with sidewalks SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED Add bikes lanes through "road diet" to create SEPARATED trail? 1e TWO RIVERS TRAIL: SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH South 7th Street Houser Way South 0.17 Collector with some sidewalks, perpendicular parking on west side SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED Reconfigure on- street parking to accommodate bikes 1f TWO RIVERS TRAIL: HOUSER WAY SOUTH Shattuck Avenue South Burnett Avenue South 0.3 Local street without sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 1g TWO RIVERS TRAIL: HOUSER WAY SOUTH (RAILROAD ROW) Burnett Avenue South Main Avenue South 0.3 Local street + RR tracks and sidewalks SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED New cross-section to allow RR use between Burnett and Main (long term?) 2 SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Black River Trail/Monster Road SW SW 43rd Street 2.85 Separated multi-use trail, paved SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED AND SOFT SURFACE 2 segments to be completed 3 MAY CREEK TRAIL Lake Washington Cougar Mountain County Park 3.8 Soft-surface hiking only trail SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE Missing link Lake Washington. Hiking/walking only. Creek crossing required. 4 PANTHER CREEK TRAIL Cleveland Richardson Property Lake Street Park 2 No existing trail SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE 1.7 to City Limits, 2.8 to Springbrook Watershed Park. Could be included as part of I-405 redevelopments. Include connection to Edlund Property. 5 HONEY CREEK TRAIL Honey Creek/ May Creek confluence Union Avenue NE 1.25 Separated multi-use trail, rough surface SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE Hiking/walking only. Creek crossing required. Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 67 TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 6 DEVIL'S ELBOW TRAIL Edmonds Avenue NE Duvall Avenue NE/Coal Creek Parkway 1.7 Abandoned local street, with sidewalks MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) + BICYCLE LANES 7 LIBERTY PARK CONNECTOR Cedar River Trail Bronson Way North/ Factory Avenue North 0.2 Public park; informal access through park SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED Need a bikeway on east side of park to connect Cedar River Trail and Garden Ave. 8 SAM CHASTAIN MEMORIAL TRAIL Cedar River Trail Gene Coulon Park 0.7 No existing trail MULTI-USE TRAIL, BOARDWALK Not intended for bikes; on hold indefinitely. 9 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH LINEAR AND PEDESTRIAN PARK South 7th Street Cedar River Trail 1 Collector/linear park with paved path and sidewalks & separated multi-use path & street SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 10 SEATTLE WATERLINE TRAIL Downtown/ I-405 at Cedar Ave. South Lake Youngs Watershed 3.75 Separated multi-use trail, rough surface SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE Utilizes utility corridor, w. spur to Cascade Park 11 SEATTLE WATERLINE SPUR Cedar River/ Riverview Park 161st/131st Ave SE 1 Separated multi-use trail, rough surface SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE Utilizes utility corridor 12 THUNDER CREEK TRAIL I-405 Puget Drive SE 0.9 Separated multi-use trail, rough surface SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE Could be included w/ I-405 redevelopment 13 BLACK RIVER TRAIL Black River Riparian Forest Trailhead/ Monster Road Springbrook Trail 1.53 Separated pedestrian trail, soft- surface SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, SOFT SURFACE (EXISTING) Trail alongside water/heron rookery 14 CEDAR RIVER TRAIL Lake Washington City Limits (east) 4.5 Paved regional trail REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) Ped. only: 6th to Lake Washington (.6 mi) 15 INTERURBAN TRAIL Sumner Tukwila 10 Paved regional trail REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) 16 RENTON SENIOR CENTER Logan Avenue North Williams Avenue North 0.15 Separated multi-use path, paved SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) Confirm ability to share path alongside Sr. Center (combine bikes and peds.) KING COUNTY PARKS TWO RIVERS TRAIL: see Parks Division Projects SOOS CREEK TRAIL Cedar River Trail Soos Creek Park (Kent) at SE 208th Street 4.5 Separated multi-use trail, rough surface REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED (EXTEND) Some existing segments; some segments being developed by King County CHIEF SEALTH TRAIL Seattle City limits/ terminus of exist. trail Renton City Limits (west) TBD Utility corridor, undeveloped REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED Various options to connection point to Renton CEDAR-SAMMAMISH TRAIL Cedar River at 154th Avenue SE Issaquah City Limits 1.8 No existing trail REGIONAL TRAIL, PAVED King County Trails Project; acquisition and route planning in progress 68 TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION - PRIORITIZED BY PROJECT 1 DUVALL AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES (138th Avenue SE/Coal Creek Pkwy) SE 136th St/ Maplewood Heights Elem. Coal Creek Parkway/ Northern City Limits 2.9 Minor arterial with sidewalks and bike lanes NE 4th to SR 900 (1.15 mi existing) BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) Carry bike lanes through intersections. 2 NORTH AND NE 3rd/4th STREET BICYCLE LANES Logan Avenue North Eastern City Limits 3 Principal arterial with sidewalks and limited bikes lanes MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + BICYCLE LANES 3 TUKWILA STATION/ LONGACRES WAY CONNECTOR (SW Grady Way and Longacres Way SW) Monster Road SW Tukwila Station Principal arterial + collector MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + BICYCLE LANES 4 LAKE WASHINGTON LOOP: AIRPORT PERIMETER ROAD & LOGAN AVENUE NORTH West entrance to Airport Park Avenue North 1.3 Shared use roadway/ designated bike route + bike lanes on Logan SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY (EXISTING) Long term: add separate bike/ped. bridge over river crossing at Logan/Airport Rd. Bridge possibly in Parks' purview? Bike lanes planned and funded; long term: improve river crossing at Logan/Airport 5 SE PETROVITSKY ROAD BICYCLE LANES (South 43rd Street/ 179th Street/SE Carr Road / SE Petrovitsky Rd) Tukwila/Green River Trail and Interurban Trail Petrovitsky Park 6 Principal arterial with some sidewalks, short separated multi-use trail segment near Ridgewood Elem. BICYCLE LANES Busy, narrow street. ROW looks to be nearly fully utilized. Some ex. separated trail at Ridgewood Elem. 6 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH 6th STREET BICYCLE LANES Cedar River Trail Bronson Way 1.12 Garden: Local/minor arterial (4th to 6th) with sidewalks. 6th: principal arterial (minor Park to Garden) with sidewalks BICYCLE LANES Reconfigure median/curb on 6th to allow bikes to make left/southbound turn onto Williams Ave. North 7 CASCADE TRAIL AND SW 27TH STREET CONNECTOR Interurban Trail/Strander Blvd Talbot Road South 1.3 Utility corridor, streets with sidewalks, exist. 0.3 mile segment of separated trail west of Oakesdale Avenue SW MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL + SHARED ROADWAY 23rd: Oakesdale to Shattuck/ Shattuck: 23rd to S. 15th/ S. 15th: Shattuck Avenue S. to S. Puget Dr/ S. Puget Dr: S. 15th S to Cascade Park 8 NE 7th STREET BIKEWAY NE Sunset Blvd Monroe Avenue NE 0.5 Street: collector with some sidewalks; on-street school walk route on south side SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Existing on-street trail separated with curb 9 NE 10th STREET BIKEWAY NE Sunset Blvd NE 164th St 1.25 Street: collector with some sidewalks; on-street school walk route on south side SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Existing on-street trail separated with curb 69 TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 10 OAKESDALE AVENUE SW BICYCLE LANES SW 7th Street SW 43rd Street 2.2 Arterial with sidewalks and bike lanes BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) Extend existing bike lanes north under I- 405 overpass with I- 405 improvements, to connect with SW 7th Street; 11 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH BICYCLE LANES SW 7th Street Renton City Limits (southwest) 3.25 Collector, bike lanes north of SW 43rd Street. Some sidewalks; on-street school walk route on east side, bike lanes from SW 43rd to S. 200th BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) Bike lane/trail under I- 405 could be included w/ I-405 redevelopment 12 EDMONDS AVENUE NE BIKEWAY AND BICYCLE LANES NE 4th Street NE 27th Street 2 Arterial and collector street with sidewalks MIXED CROSS- SECTION: BICYCLE LANES + SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Bike Lanes: NE 27th to NE 7th Streets Signed shared roadway: NE 7th to NE 3rd Streets 13 BENSON DRIVE SOUTH/ SR 515 BICYCLE LANES South Grady Way SE 192nd Street 4.1 Major arterial BICYCLE LANES 14 RIVERSIDE DRIVE NORTH BIKEWAY Williams Avenue North Bronson Way North 0.23 Street: local without sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 15 BENSON ROAD AND MAIN AVENUE SOUTH BICYCLE LANES South 2nd Street SE 176th Street 2.5 Minor arterial with some sidewalks BICYCLE LANES Bike lanes/trail could be added to Overpass over I-405 with I-405 redevelopment 16 SOUTH 2nd AND 3rd STREET BIKEWAY Rainier Avenue South Main Avenue South 1 Principal arterial, one-way, with sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Check to see if bike lanes can be accommodated thru narrowing of lanes 17 FACTORY AVENUE NORTH BIKELANES Bronson Way South North 4th Street 0.3 Minor arterial BICYCLE LANES 18 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH BICYCLE LANES Houser Way South South 2nd Street 0.34 Collector street with sidewalks BICYCLE LANES 19 116th AVENUE SE BICYCLE LANES Beacon Way SE/Puget Drive SE City Limits (south) 2.5 Minor arterial, exist. separated path north of SE 168th MIXED CROSS- SECTION: SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) + BICYCLE LANES 20 LAKE/ TOBIN/ SHATTUCK BICYCLE LANES Airport Perimeter Road South 2nd Street 0.4 Local street, with sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Required to because 2nd and 3rd are one- way. Alternative would be Logan from Airport Way to 2nd or 3rd. 21 WILLIAMS & WELLS AVENUE BIKEWAY South Grady Way North 6th St 1 Minor arterial, one- way, with sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Reconfigure crossing at 6th to allow bike passage 22 LAKE TO CREEK CONNECTOR (North 30th/ Kennewick Place North/ NE 27th Street) Burnett Avenue North Honey Creek 1.2 Street: collector and minor arterials with sidewalks and bike lanes BICYCLE LANES 70 TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 23 NE 12th STREET BIKEWAY Edmonds Avenue NE Union Avenue NE 1 Street: collector with some sidewalks; on-street school walk route on south side SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Existing on-street trail separated with curb 24 NE SUNSET BLVD/ SR 900 BICYCLE LANES NE 3rd/NE 4th Street SE May Valley Road 6.5 Principal arterial with sidewalks BICYCLE LANES 4.1 in Renton, 6.5 total 25 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL ROUTE (Duvall Avenue NE to SE 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE) Duvall Avenue NE to SE 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE SE 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE 1.2 Street: local with some sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 26 LINDBERGH/RENTON PARK SCHOOL ROUTE (SE168th Street, 128th Avenue SE and SE 164th Street) 108th Avenue SE 128th Avenue SE (Renton Park Elementary) 2.4 Collector and local streets SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 27 MONROE AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES NE 4th Street NE 12th Street 1 Minor arterial with sidewalks BICYCLE LANES 28 SOUTH 3rd PLACE BICYCLE LANES Rainier Ave. South Shattuck Ave. South 0.25 Local street BICYCLE LANES 29 GREEN RIVER TO LAKE YOUNGS CONNECTOR (South 200th St, 196th Avenue SE, SE 192nd Street) SR 167 (Kent/Green River ultimately) Lake Youngs 3.9 Minor arterials BICYCLE LANES Extend to Kent (proposed grade separated crossing of SR 167) to connect w. Green River 30 140th AVENUE SE BICYCLE LANES Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) SE 208th Street 4.3 Principal arterial. Existing bikes lanes SR 169 to SE Petrovitsky Rd (2 mi). BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) Existing segment SR 169 to Petrovitsky (2 mi); extend bike lanes south to S. 208th (2.3 mi) 31 PUGET DRIVE SE AND SOUTH 21st STREET BICYCLE LANES Talbot Road South 116th Avenue SE and Beacon Way SE 1 Minor arterial with limited sidewalks BICYCLE LANES (EXTEND EXISTING) Climbing lanes uphill only? 32 PARK AVENUE NORTH BIKEWAY North 30th Street North 40th Street/Lake Washington Blvd North 0.75 Local street SHARED USE ROADWAY 33 FAIRWOOD- PETROVITSKY PARK BIKEWAY SE 164th Street Petrovitsky Park 3.3 Arterial SHARED USE ROADWAY 34 UNION AVENUE NE BICYCLE LANES (132nd Avenue NE) SE 95th Way Dead end (about SE 4th Street) 2.1 Minor arterial with sidewalks ADD BICYCLE LANES 35 TAYLOR AND HARDIE BIKEWAY Northern city limits (toward Rainier Avenue South) SW 7th St 1.4 Shared use roadway/ designated bike route (Collector, except Hardie from Renton Ave S Extension to Langston Rd S) NO CHANGE 36 PHILIP ARNOLD PARK BIKEWAY (Cedar Avenue, South 7th Street and Beacon Way South) Beacon Way South and Cedar Avenue SE/Puget Drive SE Puget Drive SE Local and collector streets SHARED USE ROADWAY 37 SE 171st WAY BIKEWAY 140th Avenue SE SE 176th Street 0.41 Street BICYCLE LANES 71 TRAIL /ROUTE NAME FROM TO Approx Length in Miles CURRENT CROSS-SECTION PROP. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION NOTES Table 2. DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 38 NE 12th STREET BIKEWAY NE Sunset Blvd Monroe Avenue NE 0.5 Street: collector with some sidewalks; on-street school walk route on south side SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY Existing on-street trail separated with curb 39 SE MAY VALLEY ROAD BIKEWAY Coal Creek Parkway Issaquah- Hobart Road/SR 900 2.4 Rural arterial, no sidewalks SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY 40 LAKE WASHINGTON LOOP: HOUSER WAY NORTH BIKEWAY North 8th Street Park Avenue North 0.5 Shared use roadway/designated bike route (Minor Arterial) SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY (EXISTING) 41 MONSTER ROAD SW BICYCLE LANES Oakesdale Avenue SW/Black River Trail Head SW 16th Street 0.7 Collector street with bike lanes and some sidewalks BICYCLE LANES (EXISTING) 42 PACCAR Trail: GARDEN AVENUE NORTH & NORTH 8th STREET North 6th Street Houser Way North 0.5 Separated multi-use trail on east and south side on minor arterial with sidewalks SEPARATED MULTI- USE TRAIL, PAVED (EXISTING) Propose name change to distinguish from other section of Garden - PACCAR trail. Need to determine how much more width is needed. 43 SW 16th STREET BICYCLE LANES ("Longacres Bikeway") Longacres Drive Oakesdale Avenue SW 0.35 Collector street with sidewalks and bike lanes BICYCLE LANES (EXISTING) + SIGNEDSHARED ROADWAY Extend to Lind or E. Valley Road 72 73 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan SIGNAGE RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction Road networks rely on signage to communicate what condi- tions drivers can expect to encounter and to communicate rules of the road and traffic control. Nonmotorized networks rely on those same signs, but require additional roadside caution signs and pavement markings to enhance awareness and safety for both motorized and nonmotorized users. In addition, wayfinding signage for bicycles is critical to the connectivity and convenience of the nonmotorized network, especially for links between regional trails, or routes where bicycle facilities may not be contiguous. The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan addresses both caution and wayfinding signage. Roadside caution signs and pavement markings follow the standards and guidelines of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the AASHTO Guidelines for the Devel- opment of Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle route signage is based on regional standards. The timing of the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan process coincided with the Downtown Wayfinding Project, the focus of which was to “guide people into and around the Downtown area, better connect Downtown with The Landing, and enhance Downtown identity.” The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan coordinated with the Downtown Wayfinding Project to the extent that it helped identify gateways into the City and location kiosks in relation to the proposed trails and bicycle network. The following pages show examples of the proposed sign types. 74 City of Renton Roadside Caution Signs Shown mounted to freestanding posts or to existing utility poles or light standards. 75 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Pavement Markers Pavement marking showing loop detector location for bicy- cles. 76 City of Renton Bike Route Signs Shown mounted to freestanding posts or to existing utility poles or light standards. 77 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Bike Route Signs Sample application, shown at an existing signed shared roadway. 78 City of Renton Bike Route Signs Sample application, shown at an existing signed shared roadway. 79 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Proposed Signage Gateways and Kiosk Locations 80 City of Renton PART 4: BACKGROUND/PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW 83 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan PART 4: BACKGROUND/PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS PLANS AND POLICIES A major task in the development of this trails and bikeways Master Plan was the review of previous planning documents and policies and the identification of information relevant to this plan. Planning for non-motorized facilities is addressed at all levels of government: local, region/county, state, and federal, and numerous plans were reviewed to ensure con- currency with current regional planning efforts and to avoid contradictory recommendations with previous planning ef- forts. At each level of government the messages about bicycle and pedestrian facilities is echoed: to make communities more livable, make them accessible by foot and bicycle. Provide safe and convenient routes through thoughtful design and arrange land uses to make destinations more accessible so people can and will choose to make non-motorized and tran- sit trips rather than driving. The primary basis of the review was the City’s Comprehen- sive Plan, its open space plan, and most importantly, existing non-motorized plans: for trails (1993) and for walkways. Several regional plans also held particular relevance for this study. Finally, state and federal planning-level documents were reviewed. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING EFFORTS Comprehensive Plan Several sections of the Comprehensive Plan address non- motorized facilities: the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Element; the Transportation Element; and the Commu- nity Design Element. Non-motorized facilities are addressed both directly and indi- rectly in several goals of the Transportation Element: Goal 1: Contribute to a balanced multi-modal transportation system through reasonable, planned, economically feasible arterial improvements that enhance HOV and transit opera- tions, support adopted land use plans, protect or improve business access, and protect Renton’s neighborhoods. 84 City of Renton Goal 2: Maximize the use of transit in Renton by providing step-by-step improvements to produce regionally linked and locally oriented transit services and facilities needed to serve travel demand generated by Renton residents and busi- nesses. Goal 4: Maintain, enhance and increase pedestrian and bicy- cle travel by providing both safe and convenient routes and storage for the commuting and recreating public. The Non-motorized Transportation section further articulates these goals by stating that the plan is designed to “enhance the quality of life in Renton, to improve walking and bicycling safety, and to support the pedestrian and bicycle transporta- tion modes as alternatives to the use of automobiles.” The plan’s objectives include the following: Recognize and capitalize upon the multi-functionality of non-motorized facilities: accommodate both com- muting and recreational uses Enhance both internal circulation and linkages to re- gional routes and destinations Provide connections to open space areas and other recreational opportunities Ensure a comprehensive, interconnected non- motorized network Facilitate connections to transit facilities Recognize and accommodate the diversity of non- motorized travel modes, user abilities (ensuring ADA compliancy of new facilities) and trip purposes Add hiking trails, water trails, canoe launches The Non-motorized section acknowledges that the City’s ex- isting transportation system has not been oriented toward accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists and the policies. The non-motorized plan, therefore, provides a framework to reevaluate the existing system for the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, and to provide for a better environment for non-motorized travel. Approximately a dozen policies provide a basis for expanding and enhancing the existing network, addressing the following aspects: Bicyclists and pedestrians Transit use Universal access The interrelation of the motorized network to the non- motorized 85 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan The diversity of transportation modes/user groups and trip purposes Separation between modes/users and safety of users Hiking Water trails The existing bicycle and pedestrian network is briefly de- scribed and evaluated. Proposed routes are listed. Outside of the central business district, the Plan states that bicycles are allowed to share the sidewalks with pedestrians, provided they yield to those on foot. At the same time, the plan encourages the separation of modes, in the name of safety, to the greatest degree possible. As the City’s network expands, this policy may need to be reevaluated in light of creating a more hospitable and safe environment for pedestri- ans. Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Element The following objectives and policies within the Parks, Rec- reation, Open Space, and Trails Element deal with non- motorized facilities: Objective P-F: Create a walkable community by developing and maintaining a comprehensive trails system that provides non-motorized access through the City, maximizes public ac- cess to parks, schools, and open space areas, connects to regional trail systems, and provides increased recreational opportunities for the public. Policy P-63: Trails should provide for the needs of a diverse population of users including groups such as adults, children, seniors, workers, the disabled and other people engaging in either passive and/or active pursuits including: a. pedestrians, b. recreational bicyclists, c. joggers/runners, d. in-line skaters, e. bicycle commuters f. canoeists and kayakers, and g. hikers. Policy P-66: Linkages should be provided with surrounding communities within major regional corridors such as the Ce- dar River, Green River, the Lake Washington Loop, and the Soos Creek Trail. Policy P-68: Integrate Renton’s recreational trail needs into a comprehensive trail system serving both local and regional users. 86 City of Renton Policy P-69: Plan and coordinate appropriate pedestrian and bicycle commuter routes along existing minor arterial and col- lector arterial corridors. Policy P-69: Plan and coordinate appropriate pedestrian and bicycle commuter routes along existing minor arterials and collector arterial corridors. Policy 78: Provide opportunities for the public to access, via Lake Washington, the “Lakes to Locks” regional water trail system. Again, the separation between foot/bicycle and between trails and roadway, where possible, is advocated. Community Design Element The section on streets, sidewalks and streetscape in the Community Design Element promotes pedestrian-friendly de- sign through a number of objectives and policies aimed at more detailed design considerations. One policy in particular, however, suggests a number of important criteria for enhanc- ing non-motorized connectivity: Policy CD-60. Criteria should be developed to locate pedes- trian and bicycle connections in the City. Criteria should con- sider: Linking residential areas with employment and com- mercial areas; Providing access along arterials; Providing access within residential areas; Filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system where ap- propriate; and Providing access through open spaces and building entries to shorten walking distances In conclusion, the inclusion, enhancement and promotion of non-motorized facilities are supported on many levels through the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 1993 Trails Master Plan The 1993 Trails Master Plan is a thorough and well- considered plan for the development of a trail system in and around Renton, the first of its kind for the City. It was adopted as part of the Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Plan. The plan reflects a focus on open space, preser- vation, and recreation, and was created through a compre- hensive community involvement process. The plan breaks the City up into six geographic planning ar- eas (though the City now uses slightly different planning ar- eas), based on boundaries formed by major vehicular trans- 87 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan portation corridors or major geographic features: Interstate 405, State Routes 900 (Sunset Boulevard), 167 (the Valley Freeway), and 169 (Maple Valley Road and the Cedar River). Within these areas, the plan identifies the major corridors and travel routes for non-motorized travel: Northeast Corridors: East Shore Lake Washington, May Creek/Honey Creek East Corridors: Renton-Issaquah Southeast Corridors: Cedar River, Seattle and Mercer Island Waterlines Southwest Corridors: Orillia-Petrovitsky, Green River Valley West Corridor: Black River Northwest Corridor: West Shore Lake Washington Each of the proposed corridors, and subsequently the feasi- bility of the proposed routes, is thoroughly analyzed. The plan recommends a separate, hierarchical system of major and minor trails for pedestrians (24 routes) and bicyclists (28 routes). Many routes share the street right-of-way, and five are mixed use, along separated rights-of-way. In addition, the plan details trail standards and puts forth an implementation plan. Though the proposed routes are not all still valid, and conditions throughout the City have changed, the plan provides an excellent foundation and resource for non-motorized planning today. It is interesting to contrast the 1990 plan’s focus on open space, preservation, and recrea- tion with the current climate of non-motorized planning, with the greater emphasis on bicycling as a mode of transporta- tion. 2004 Draft Trails Plan The more recent current trails plan provides an updated in- ventory of existing and planned trails, and serves as a plan- ning-level resource. It identifies 31 trails or routes, for both hiking and biking, de- scribing in general terms the existing conditions and pro- posed character (surfacing, primarily) of each trail (see Ap- pendix F). In addition, connections and destinations (parks or facilities) are mapped on top of aerial photographs for each route. Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study (2003) The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study is in some ways the counterpart to the trails and bikeways plan. The study features a detailed analysis of how pedestrians are ac- 88 City of Renton commodated in the City’s existing street network and an iden- tification of the missing links in the system. It also includes detailed analyses and strategies for building out sidewalks – cross-section options, evaluation/prioritization systems, time- lines, cost estimates, and funding options. The overall purpose of this study differs somewhat from the Trails and Bikeways Plan, with its focus on inventory, identifi- cation of missing links and the implementation of sidewalks. However, the study is a valuable complement to the Trails and Bikeways Plan. Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Implementation Plan (2003) The adopted Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space Plan presents a valuable mix of big-picture and more detailed analysis of the City’s public lands, present and proposed. Parks and open spaces are important trip generators for non- motorized travel. The identification of existing and future des- tinations is an important component of the Renton Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. In addition, the plan nicely describes the City’s physical setting – natural features, topography, and character. REGIONAL LEVEL Destination 2030: Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Central Puget Sound Region (revised 2006) The Puget Sound Regional Council developed Destination 2030 to provide a strategy for making regional decisions re- lated to growth, transportation, and other elements that affect the quality of life for residents of the region. The report proposes strategies to curb trends leading to greater congestion, many of which support and encourage non-motorized improvements. Specific policies that support the Trails and Bikeways Plan echo the policies in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, last revised in 2006, was prepared as a first step toward implementation of the policies set forth in Vision 2030 and Destination 2030, a re- gional planning document that provides a strategy for deci- sions related to growth and transportation. The MTP identi- fies the need to invest in three major program areas: Development of a Regional Network of Non-motorized Transportation Facilities. 89 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Development of Local Networks for Non-motorized Travel. Development of Transit Access for Pedestrians and Cyclists. In addition, the MTP includes a map demarcating a Prelimi- nary Regional Non-motorized Network, which includes major separated trails or bikeways and shared use bikeways or walkways. Appendix 9 “Projects” identifies transportation im- provements; both motorized and non-motorized that are for- mally part of Destination 2030. Data obtained from these list- ings will be used as an aid in developing this plan. King County Regional Trail Inventory and Implementation Guidelines (2004) The City of Renton is sited at the juncture of several impor- tant regional trails. King County’s regional trail inventory ex- amines each trail in its system, identifying missing links and proposing short-term and long-term uses for each of these corridors. The regional trails/corridors that pass through or near Renton include: Interurban Trail Green River Trail Lake Washington Loop Cedar River Trail Soos Creek Trail Connections to and between these trails will provide both re- gional and local trail-user benefits and will be a priority of this plan. Of particular interest and priority to King County are connections between the following regional trail corridors: Green River/Interurban Trail and Cedar River Trail/ Lake Washington Loop Cedar River Trail and East Lake Sammamish Trail Cedar River and Soos Creek Trails Making these connections has also been identified by the public as the highest priority for Renton’s non-motorized net- work. Left by the Side of the Road: Puget Sound Regional Bicycle Network Study, Assessment and Recommendations (Cascade Bicycle Club, 2005) This document purports to be the “most detailed assessment of bicycle routes ever performed” in the Puget Sound region. The study examines existing conditions, identifies missing links and prioritizes key connections. It also rates existing 90 City of Renton bike routes with a pass or fail rating based on a number of different factors. The plan examines routes through Downtown Renton, and rates the NE 3rd/4th Street route “fail.” In addition, the plan identifies a missing link called the “Black River Connector Trail,” which would connect the Interurban Trail with the Black River Trail (enabling a connection with the Lake Washington Loop) via 68th S/Monster Rd and Ft. Dent Park in Tukwila. This trail segment has appeared in other plans as the “Fort Dent Connector” and is also seen as a high priority by King County. As with King County’s regional trail plan, improvements and completion of these routes would provide benefits beyond just the City of Renton, and are given high priority accord- ingly. I-405 Corridor Improvements The I-405 Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects is a multi-modal strategy that features a number of bicycle and pedestrian improvements through jurisdictions along the corridor, as part of the larger I-405 Corridor Improvements Project. Six improvements are identified in the Renton/ Tukwila area and will help complete the non-motorized net- work. Some of these improvements, including some in Ren- ton, are described in the first phase of the master plan, and will be funded through the Washington State Department of Transportation 2003 “Nickel” Funding Package. Others are planned for future phases of the project, to be funded through various funding mechanisms (see Appendix J). Shorter-term enhancement possibilities associated with the I- 405 improvements include the widening of several routes that pass under or over I-405: Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Talbot Road South Benson Road South These routes are currently not wide enough to safely accom- modate bicycles and pedestrians. The City is working with WSDOT to create safer non-motorized routes as these corri- dors are redeveloped. BNSF Rail Corridor Preservation Study King County and the Port of Seattle are considering a pur- chase and land swap deal that would allow the approximately 91 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 65-mile Burlington Northern Sante Fe rail corridor for devel- opment as a trail. The BNSF line is the route of the former Spirit of Washington Dinner Train, whose terminus was in downtown Renton at Burnett Avenue South. BNSF temporar- ily closed the line in 2007 to allow improvements to bridges through downtown Renton. The corridor will still be used to move fuselages between the Boeing Renton Plant and Everett. Details for the development of the corridor were be- ing negotiated during the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan proc- ess. The development of the corridor would provide several important opportunities for trail connections/trail heads, and access to the central business district, transit, and some parks/community centers through Renton. These potential connections will be incorporated into the Trails and Bikeways Plan. STATE LEVEL Washington’s Transportation Plan (WTP) 2007-2026 (2006) The WTP recognizes the many benefits bicycling and walking provide to a community: environmental, health, and a reduc- tion in congestion and positive economic impact. “Innovation should also facilitate readily available alternative transporta- tion, including bicycles and walking, which conserve energy and contribute to personal health.” The goals of the Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian Walkways Plan are to in- crease non-motorized travel while also increasing safety, through the following strategies: Maximizing funding through partnerships Raising awareness of the needs for bicycle and pe- destrian safety Sharing information on bicycle and pedestrian issues between agencies, jurisdictions, and organizations in Washington State. Increasing safety is a major focus of the plan, and it proposes to do this through engineering, education and enforcement. Recommendations within Renton’s Trails and Bikeways Plan will meet the following criteria for the funding of projects through state funds: Improving intersections by providing: curb extensions, lighting, raised median, crosswalk enhancements, signs, signals, and mid-block crossing treatments Completing bicycle lanes and sidewalks Constructing bicycle and pedestrian paths Providing safe routes to transit 92 City of Renton Providing pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements for at-risk group (children, the elderly, and people with disabilities) Distribution of educational materials. 93 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS This master plan uses a variety of terms to describe pro- posed and facilities/improvements for bicyclists and pedestri- ans. These terms are adapted from WSDOT Design Manual, Section 1020 Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle route – An officially designated system of facilities for use by bicyclists. A series of bicycle facilities may be combined to establish a continuous route and may consist of any or all types of bicycle facilities. Bike lane – A portion of a highway or street identified by signs and pavement markings intended for exclusive use by bicycles. Dedicated facility – a bike lane, path or other improvement for the exclusive use by bicycles and/or pedestrians Facility – general term used to describe a set of improve- ments or measures designed to accommodate bicycles or pedestrians Path – In this master plan, the term path is used to denote an informal route, such as a footpath or desire path. Shared roadway – a roadway that is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel. This may be an existing roadway, a street with wide curb lanes, or a road with paved shoulders. Shared-use or multi-use path/trail – a facility, often within a road-right-of-way, that is physically separated from motor ve- hicle traffic and designed for use by a variety of non- motorized users. Signed shared roadway – a roadway that has been desig- nated as a route for bicycle use by signing and/or other measures intended to increase safety and convenience for bicycles. Trail – according the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999), “in many states, the term trail means an unimproved recreational facility”. In this master plan, the term trail is used to denote an official non-motorized facility, whether planned or existing, and will be used with qualifying descriptors, such as multi-use trail. Walkway – pedestrian facilities that can be either separated from roadways, such as sidewalks and paths, or part of road- ways, such as crosswalks or wide shoulders. 94 City of Renton 95 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan BIBLIOGRAPHY Cascade Bicycle Club. 2005. Left by the Side of the Road: Puget Sound Regional Bicycle Net- work Study, Assessment and Recommendations. City of Kent. 2007. City of Kent Transportation Master Plan. City of Newcastle. 2003. Comprehensive Plan, Figure PTR-2, Newcastle Trail System. City of Renton. 2004. Comprehensive Plan. City of Renton. 1993. Trails Master Plan. City of Renton. 20043. Draft Trails Plan. City of Renton. 2003. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Implementation Plan. City of Renton. 2003. Comprehensive Walkway Study. City of Tukwila. 2007. City of Tukwila Draft Non Motorized Plan. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 1999. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Prepared by the AASHTO Task Force on Geometric De- sign. HDR, Bellevue, WA. 2007. BNSF Rail Corridor Preservation Study. Puget Sound Regional Coun- cil. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.psrc.org/projects/bnsf/index.htm. King County. 1992. King County Regional Trail Plan. King County Parks, Planning Resources Department, Parks Division. King County. 2004. Regional Trail Inventory and Implementation Guidelines. King County De- partment of Natural Resources and Parks. King County. 2007. HealthScape: Community Design for Health and the Environment/ Sustainability through Healthy Community Design. www.metrokc.gov/HealthScape National Center for Safe Routes to School. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.saferoutesinfo.org. Nelson, Alyse. 2007. Livable Copenhagen: The Design of a Bicycle City. Center for Public Space Research, Copenhagen and University of Washington, Seattle. Pedestrian and Bicycling Information Center. 2007. Shared Use Paths. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.bicyclinginfo.org/engineering/paths-principles.cfm Puget Sound Regional Council. 2003. Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Implementation Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region 9. Accessed from www.psrc.org/projects/nonmotorized/ implementation/ch2.pdf 96 City of Renton Puget Sound Regional Council. No. T17, November 2001. Biking and Walking in the Central Puget Sound Region. Accessed from http://www.psrc.org/publications/pubs/trends/t17nov01.pdf Puget Sound Regional Council. November 2003. Puget Sound Trends: Census 2000 Data Illus- trate Diverse Commute Modes. Accessed from www.psrc.org/publications/pubs/trends/ t21nov03.pdf Puget Sound Regional Council. Revised 2006. Destination 2030: Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Central Puget Sound. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.psrc.org/projects/mtp/index.htm Tracy-Williams Consulting. 1996. Bike Plan Source: Specific Roadway Environments. Re- trieved 3-26-2008 from www.bikeplan.com/roads.htm Washington Department of Transportation. 2006. Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) 2007- 2026. Washington Department of Transportation. 2006. WSDOT Design Manual. Chapter 1020: Bicy- cle Facilities. Accessed from www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/Policy/DesignManual/ DMChapters/DM1020_06_Nov.pdf Washington Department of Transportation. 2007 Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) Manual. If . g• .• •. $ . .4 ' ' Alt 1...,. • • .1.. ,vs' ..,.? ' •o ,. "Ir • .. • • ; !..t.e,-'..4 ' •• •., •., --.- ' • . . --,....s 111,6. i ".4. ..ir,• ' ` * IN -, • a • la, .1 .' 1 ill..-- vv. .3_ „ .• •. . • ../P 't.. ilir* • f... ' .,,..'422,42 • ' • t• . • 111, !Vt? ."-..,/,4111 No,- -ir • Ny - ,, .. .4! r ., ' •.. •' Ns'......... -. .' .. • •-------7.-.•. . • 9'.• ' '' •II. . 0 ....°111 4$11• . .. ,.' 1, . .t. •::• , • : z. .• I ' A . t•IA .. • •Law „Ar- --.. • • -, ,....;. „ .„7.virli• ••.iv. %. - , ,_ •• 1.,. r '-'-r . • •- • • - • . .., \•.•71.4-- - -r: 1. i •Ft. •.. . .. 4.2iblir . .• .Aatl. . ..,.... , ..e.'..4141. • , .:• ,•\...••••‘;),"`.-% .,'; ' .,- A10 W) • .045.. • -.,,,2. ••a-, . . -i.,.., v .... ‘),. $.....„. . .. ,,• •- • , Jr- - ,,a. t , . f .• ii • fit/ . . •i••-' .10,,44. ..,,.'• 44.II: ,40' '14 ' .,; '1%'' I . • 4,;••• If ..., ,.'111P ..... .4".:111' ,.. ' , r , oirs•.t r. ---. .. ..., ..v. ,,, --....r.• ••. • • e ., .r ... . . • 0 .0 f V - ' 4.• . •4 , , t;i: 2 ...• • As • • •-'.14. ; 1' '• . , ' '•4• ' *. .0.10' 4 !4'• • ,',,' 4-, 4.0' 4 ......' . • •1 ... 4:. lb• A. f • 21e• it• ' ' ••• • .1- -.:k.V.4.* P* ' ...` 4; * ' 'II'd. IV' • ' •:.•••'' :.:4t • " ,'Ny-......est.. . . .. - . ,,, .%.• ,. -,4 8,.•.••• - •a. , ••• .• . •. . •• r• . . .. 1,. • -., • -' . .r.1 i 6.•- •T‘ - ' • V- - . •gliW.' - 'a i , '' • •••' • ' . :.•? `•' • ' ., ', •.,1111tea#t: '`.. -.) - . .. , • ,• , -.. .1::t ?., - .. , ,;••• • •.. T.. -. ‘,./.- A'• • . '":4-!.• e. .t.-7.A•...; ' '( 1:6. ''''74., 4111,0 4 .• . •. . ,,i,..• ,." '.,. `‘(...-4r...,::' 4. • A.' •• ' ..- 11,„ •• . 7. 11 ""' s'• cfriP , i -Lin. , iillk• --r 1 . • t...,"*.r P ' •-4'4 :'4, • ' -4.•' • •.' 0:1(4';': ' • 4• " *4 is 1.4 ...l .o• • A '.',f?. A' ..4 4 ' . • " I • s• .' ..•t..'' ' ..• • 14 7 •- '/'. i , ..1 . ,• 11 ,,A01` 111 .41 •. 1.-. . . • • • .. .JJ • N. , . ,/ • ` ile .1. •• w . .- • r - (...4,, ,,• r „; ,, , 1 1... . ‘. .. ,••;•.7;4 ' . . . ....••:.. ..., 3,;k1C:,..,' . . . • •.4 ...., ‘... 10/ • , Ilk -•4 . ...• • •% IP $ ' . $00 ..d; r • ., .• , ••.!•1,. .:.b.i,• -••••;, .:. . .4.?•••(,:.'•••:. • •NAN":• . ••„ 2,... ' ..: 4 ' '14 ;.'•• r-•'' S. . ,. /k,4 •4 tej:% .4. 'i i•0 A ' .: ;c 4:.."- „-:.l'" `'; - • • A . 4 . ;' 1 s• • 'tlA••• • 4:• f - : -•. • •'...4' %.•.:?•'%Si,'' . ' • . .:.. • k 4 ,4,, , . •-•4.••••• ',' '.... . •-14.-•• - . . - - ... . Iv ' 4,•"- _ • • i ' - • 4*-. • 4 - if- •• 0• .' • •' . ' ' 10 $ , k - ••se" ‘1114v, . 1 .•"`` .)..). - • - ..---, 074-• -/*110. .•-.._,...„,' avi ,a •• . ... . .. . .9,• a , f k.,. . . ... 4 • . •-•, •:. . •-I. . -1-1 liti• .$7 ***' • 1114 .. 4,, 'it•••,, *Al, ••16g,A'''..re- ... . " ie, tirciit-.-1-• , _ _ • ..• . ,. . . • •,- % ,. • .. ,,,,.....,t, ., • . • •;:i • -1,,. - ' - ::' - •--- %IP Ac'et't-.- . • - . 4 .. U , •. ... '4*•%•4 t -'-`--. -"'•-":' "-•"*•17•••t•tv 'i....' • 1 glEV 1‘. 4 A i.4t 1 , 4 .7•• .- S. '''. toll". .., . • ' .• t•V a-- 1,1'.t•''- ' • .W' 44 $ ''' A' . ' 1,‘ t. •... ..4"":',• , Alt; .. 4., . 3,,, .•..,:, .: 4 ,‘„ ‘it dos, .,,r, , i •10 , .*-, , ..!"-%,.. t. • •_,A, itt• . . . 1. 11 I.; . ..k•... #1 0 Ili . '.4 '....'.I--$;": .;:-..., ''.4.'f.,- 4 , OD • •••- • AfF. ' . ' -`4:' ... „ '•. ../I.% . 4, . ., ' 4 • t•.A . •• ./ 131' .'. 1.•• ..••S• "'•. NV, - 4 , -- - • • • , . , . C CI , A'A. . ,. li..n • , • , • . , . 4 'i . . . s.1hflill; ‘. •••.,, ;:it;.14.i......r. .4 :NI .... ,14,,,,,,,,,. ! • '''. V ..' di. 4. IN 's' •i' , 4... 1. le 4 , 4 , .,. 4...: 14 ,- . • • • , • < f • 2 ar ;fa", •',it.. ; 'A 4 •'• ' l', ' -,, / di• 4 L .....„- • i Ni it ' , • , , o•• . ..in. ..• - 2. •. U") . , ,- • ' 4, • '1- • ., 4.! ..,•. ,..)..„ ,)( - : -, • . •..s.4,. r.. ....„• - A.! • ,A. • 'N . ' •. . 4,•e,. .t. -..- _II• 1, • ••• . .. ,. ,•• • ., • 1.,, .. • N ' k ., -. - - . i , .11i", • . ,-..,. • .4L\ o - 4 ' - ..:* ' - w:it• .A.tO • i •-• ' '4 < < ,..'t „.. , ...,,•' , .• .Nk ,"' , • .,* ct' . Pt •11 •.11• • • Ye!"• .• •. 1,!, ' • • .* ' '. . ;lk $. . Iiirk. , . . • * ' it, 4-;.4. .;.;a , I- Ci_ c) .,,, ., .. - '......,... •.- ik.1 •....;• . . a t.‘ .* % ' ' .'4'.'1 6, •4,.• .. z (NC) \' Z.4' ",, 1•*'"(.. $.* ' , 444, tT4ix ..... Alt. N --- 10• .. 4 ' 46 ' '' , , r s.4. ..#• • .4: - .: .. . _-. 4••• \ .`' • k a ..1 .• 1 k ... .... , .... ye ., ,:. , faç. 0 U-I ,... ,„. ....... .. ' -.Tr viii - .-.• - •• .S "...I 11/11M164164111.11* I . ( rII-- ID - .' . '). ' .• . . L , A , .•44 E i-- ,,,,., . itk •..„ _ -, 4 4 -• .. . 1,:-, , ....,01). . . •,... . • , ,....'• •- • spzior,,,...• •-. • • , .. 4, x.1 No'. ) # 'l'",'7.:1P-As.4.. 1.•i .1 .,;jthkrr. - ..--i'v . b,•4* ;" .. , "• . '1 ' r.., 4-.0 Iligt k .., . , .,, ‘ . ,.. . . . ,, ...f• ... . , u_i < a_ -•• f. - ia) et . • • que, rt. : * -•.% ,‘ Ce Z Ln p A '. ,a s"s‘ 1 44:)) .0..... „.1,G1NT•li,:,'‘,,,,q te #,,,.. .... t . •'' • . • b .. ...A...\4/ . •• Z 't,, . •••• . V ' . ,rrf f . lia .• i).-.).* 4.•4'La bt - %• CITY OF RENTON OCT 1 6 2008 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE �tivY 0,40, MASTER PLAN es (11 41- August 2008 ‘4N`c° DRAFT Prepared by: MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects Connie Reckord and Kristen Lohse Transportation Engineering Northwest Michael Read, P.E. Andrew R. Golding AIA SEGD, Signage Consultant ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City Administration Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Peter Hahn, Transportation Systems Division Dan Hasty, Transportation Planning Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning Leslie Betlach, Parks Division Todd Black, Parks Division Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Renton Non-Motorized Transportation Committee Renton Parks Commission City Council Members Terri Briere Randy Corman, Council President Pro Tern Marcie Palmer, Council President King Parker Don Persson Greg Taylor Rich Zwicker Denis Law, Mayor ) ' ..*J`>ria14,14, y„ .7. .0„,41...:m, :iiy� ,-' amo' ` 'r? '` say, " r . .•'r,..160,-4.,.....k, 4--- s •F .y ,4 atr.. cam;ye ;,.A:Nirs\ J -. . . f �/� YN Ate' ."_ a r"- '.C r -tS ! :. -� ,o-,. , ` az� Y= - .sh • :;:ss r _ w..,,, ^-�^Z�. .may 4'F .>. �",. -~ 'F� .-' Y DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (forthcoming) PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Vision Statement 5 Overview and Purpose 6 Growth Management Act 7 Project Process 7 Public Outreach 8 Public Input 9 Goals and Objectives 10 PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS The Setting 15 Destinations and Trip Generators 16 Existing Trails and Bicycle Facilities 19 Planning Area Evaluations and Opportunities 23 PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS Routing 35 Evaluation Criteria & Methodology 37 Cross Sections 40 Design Standards 50 Recommended Improvements 51 Project Prioritization 51 Signage Recommendations 73 PART 4: BACKGROUND, PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW Review and Summary of Previous Plans and Policies 83 City of Renton 83 Regional Level 93 State Level 97 TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS 95 BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 1 DRAFT APPENDICES 99 A. Master List of Proposed Improvements and Existing Facilities B. Summary of Comments from Public Open Houses C. List of Routes in 1990 Trail Plan and Status D. Map of Renton Schools and Parks E. Map of Issaquah Schools F. Map of Kent Schools G. Puget Sound Regional Council List of Non-motorized Improvements H. 1-405 Proposed Improvement Projects in Renton I. 2009-2014 TIP J. Non-motorized Funding Sources PROJECT SHEETS Following Appendices LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Project Process 7 Fig. 2. Geographic Planning Areas 17 Fig. 3. 2006 Aerial Photo 18 Fig. 4. "Ped Shed" 19 Fig. 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facilities 20 Fig. 6. Sample Evaluation Matrix 38 Fig. 7. General Guidelines for Selecting Cross-Sections 39 Fig. 8. Types of Cross Sections 40 Fig. 9. Proposed Trails and Bikeways Improvements 53 Fig. 10. Proposed Trails and Bikeways Improvements—Downtown 55 SIGNAGE FIGURES Sign types, layouts, pavement markings, Downtown Wayfinding and Kiosk Locations 75 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Draft Prioritized Matrix of Recommended Improvements 57 Table 2. Recommended Improvements, by Division 60 Table 3. (also Appendix A) 99 2 City of Renton PART 1 : INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW . ::-�;: - • .1 '•SYS(.,"",-i 1 ` '4"';4.,:- +,,. 317'+?-"•� -T- ' fl ' ..r.;;.' tip. t 1' ;t1".;:' Et 1 •. .�_ ., - y - } °. !6✓�.' _:' �'� �fir.-.;a t e#rte .''Ct , :z— ,•. `�. C't. ;�t( S ter;-•,• � i ` s • • . • �- Y yr +, - ♦ ywJ -s'. \'.'Sym ✓. M},,•, ♦ —Z: T v tic•t.3"�t`�. s 7 f Ap Ar iJea _p,_ , ,.4.....%.,.., 1 iv 1411`F47-,4441,$„.„..._:,',-,;,, - -:K, -_ •• - til .• ,.y' , •,'AW.•''. t ' •1•e,4-. c` ,'TP' -':';;%(�' ••,�y Zr•�` •� ' taaw4 .41'`. -t ♦ .3•�,r.`" 4-. r .,Y J� i.rt'•• • <'l %� r..r .(11'y •. tq� + • ?Ate?'V1 K • v�,•:,. A. .. �0 s 7 1I, • ,.., �{ yrs ./„. r' '.. .)_J• ,'•/!]•.r 'W1i1 ! • .^1j ft-Are•, -- i~�A 1�•R, �1'1-..'1.jrt1R ho �4 vs. ,� �r� { ',r� r�,- f'YI. '� .+' ya `1 t,^ Y`Ike it' 47'4 = at! ,< ., i ” „4, 11414 II, - ,5.. fig• 'fir t. i -•? 4vs •'j. • 6 . IG s. �(. 1 ..'„ ,„."4. ',,j��t.J•”1 `. �y", r�.na,Y? t i' -"L' .�,J�A tr..r� -'. /r' 1 i , , i't t•�...tl�` _ :.� •�.:.? lt!'1i,_�`_._ ���.,K'l \ ,�"A -'its - t'r r•.� ,j fsl+y_ :" .- :r •.,,16, ''!-iii a• '•- t e 4t ..4.1 .,••. \I' • �' i7/. _ 4.-J_ _,.• -4.._... �. '. ^ . . • , 7 sp"^.. •-••••1 DRAFT Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan VISION STATEMENT The Bicycle and Trails Master Plan creates and fosters opportunity within Renton and neighboring communities for people to move through the city and to access multiple local and regional destinations including schools, parks, businesses and residential areas. The mas- ter plan supports a city where residents and visitors can enjoy recrea- tion and exercise contributing to a healthy lifestyle, and where com- muting by bicycle using an integrated trails/road network, becomes a realistic transportation alternative. .F^ �s,} i yr 1 ' 44100,444 4. L7 'i • Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 5 DRAFT . 6 '''-'-'''�: ' ''y' PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW `_-..: { - Y 'a 'g 'kar OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE _- � ` - In 2006 the City of Renton's Transportation Division received 1 - -'' --•,;5-c:-,:-- a federal grant to produce a bicycle route map and future bi- . ___-4,---__ -,--,-:- _: :, ;-- cycle route plan for the City and the potential annexation ar- ieas. Within the same time frame the City of Renton's Parks I ` i `�� I Division was in the process of hiring a consultant to update Jones Park from Cedar River Trail their trails planning document. Instead of having two docu- ments, one for bike routes and one for trails, the City of Ren- - ; ',ti " ` ' --7'=' ton's Transportation and Parks Divisions have combined their b_" ```'S. •-• r `-.... :2" ` ' resources to create this integrated and comprehensive plan- _,�-- -------,--4-4-•--: �:__ Hing document that ties together the Parks Division's recrea- _: -••---4. ,4 tion-oriented trails, paths, and sites and Transportation's bike ., route facilities. _r �" , ..,,--!-n,. -4 The most recent Parks trails planning document was adopted :– -. "i " = r by Council in 1993, and an updated draft completed in 2004 ai dp , tib: fir;` l --4:471 • ",.. _-14 f f •in.conjunction with the Non-motorized Transportation Advi- - sory Committee.While progress has been made on the im- The Landing, under construction plementation of the adopted plan, major new development, particularly in the City's core, have made the need for an up- .4: p-.a: 7--..2• • --, . i,'',. date evident. Furthermore, there are more cyclists on the •;z,_ ,, -• ;•r^ ' road today, as people recognize the health benefits of cycling .-'rt-i ,• ° `t for both recreational and commuting purposes, as well as the '+,:.:,, *,, • 't1.:-. •'- potential relief from traffic congestion and rising energy costs. (� ! w t '' _=�"e `'A... . :imi 44 F , ..' GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT �� = ? F i ,, - The 2005 Amendments to Washington State's Growth Man- - ;,rl- _ agement Act (GMA) mandates the incorporation of bicycle ; „ ;,, _ and pedestrian planning into each jurisdiction's comprehen- Bike route sign on North Airport Way sive plan, as well as the consideration of approaches that promote physical activity. 4,, .r.- , s"' !. The recommendations of the Master Plan, when adopted, will z v •k<<. ,,, , k., :',-41-- ""+; be an implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. ter, 1 ;*__ / `".''''' 01 Beyond compliance with state mandates, the value of non- ,-% Ems`' _ ;, ' 8 - }-,t r' motorized planning is evident to most communities in the •` -4 .4-, r.;, - Puget Sound region for the multiple benefits it provides: flexi- i •,, .; , y r.-- ,, bility in transportation choice, congestion relief, health bene- a„,,\T fits, fun, and enhanced livability for communities. Pedestrian sign off Lake Washington The unique combination and configuration of Renton's geo- Boulevard North graphic setting, land use patterns, transportation network, and recreational opportunities set the stage for the develop- ment of a well-connected network of trails and bikeways. Renton's central location within the Puget Sound region, in- terconnection with, and easy access to, the region's motor- 6 City of Renton DRAFT ized transportation system, and the presence/existence of major employment centers centrally located within the City, THE TRAILS AND BICYCLE make it a readily accessible place to live, work, and play. Unique natural resources like the Cedar River, Lake Wash- MASTER PLAN ington, and proximity to the Green River Valley and Cougar • Builds on previous non-motorized Mountain Regional Wildland Park also make it an excellent plans recreational destination. Perhaps most significantly, the City is the hub of three major regional trails: the Cedar River • Goes beyond previously proposed Trail, the Lake Washington Loop, and the Interurban Trail, routes to look at the big picture: providing Renton direct access to over 80 miles of regional policy, plans,and proposal at both trail. the local and the regional scale Tying these resources together through a network of trails and bikeways, as this Master Plan outlines, will ensure that Renton remains "ahead of the curve" in terms of livability by creating an accessible, sustainable, and pleasant place to live, work, and play. PROJECT PROCESS The Master Plan was developed through a process that com- prised five main tasks: 1. Information Review and Preliminary Documentation: The first task entailed a planning and regulatory investiga- tion of policies at federal, state, and local levels as well as relevant local and regional plans and proposals. A set of guiding principals for the development, design, and imple- mentation of the trails and bicycle network was also de- veloped during this task. 2. Existing Conditions Evaluation: The second task consisted of an inventory of existing con- ditions and opportunities; assessment of traffic or trip gen- erators and destination service areas; and analysis of travel corridors, including soft-surface hiking and walking trails. This information was presented to the public at the project's first open house. 3. Routing Options & Evaluation Criteria The third task involved transportation planning analysis and identification of route options; designation of pro- posed routes and cross-sections; and establishment of evaluation criteria for designating priorities. A second open house was conducted to get the public's input at this stage of the process. 4. Draft Master Plan & Bicycle-Friendly Routes Map The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan document was drafted during this fourth task, incorporating information from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 7 DRAFT destinations and connections two open houses and finalizing the recommendations. Two maps were created during this task; one showing I 0 existing trails and bicycle routes and a second map show- ing proposed routes. In addition a signage plan comple- j• menting the proposed routes and safety flyer were® cre- ated. A third public meeting for the project was con- ' ducted, to share the Draft Master Plan and recommenda- tions to the public and get their feedback. evaluate existing network 5. Final Master Plan and Bicycle-Friendly Routes Map 0 Completion of the Master Plan included final evaluation of / the recommended routes and the development of project .� • sheets for selected routes. The signage elements were also finalized during this task, along with the bicycle- i friendly routes map, which features safety information for cyclists. identify preferred network PUBLIC OUTREACH js ' Public input and participation in the Master Plan process was / ; ; a valuable resource for on-the-ground information and overall � ��. validation of the project. As described above, the project M.• conducted three public meetings, described in greater detail below. prioritize Public Open House#1: The purpose of this first public open O.- 5, ; house was to further develop the inventory of destinations, / i identify all potential trail and bikeway routes, confirm existing z 4 3. conditions and opportunities, and refine the program and to i listen to concerns. The project team solicited comments from the community to supplement other inventory and research, Figure 1. Project Process and aid the team in evaluating corridors and options. Presen- tation graphics included goal statements, existing conditions maps, aerial photographs, and site images. Public Open House#2: The second open house included a presentation of the route options, evaluation criteria, cross sections, and other improvements. The goal of the meeting was to solicit comments from the public on the alternatives and seek consensus on a preferred network of routes. Corn- ments from these meetings were incorporated into the Draft Trails and Bikeways Plan. Public Open House#3: The draft plan recommendations were presented and public comment sought. 8 City of Renton DRAFT PUBLIC INPUT Attendance at each of the open houses was between 20 and 40 attendees. Participants were able to offer their comments to the team during both presentations and working sessions, and comment forms and maps were available for those wish- ing to leave written comments. In addition, a brief project de- scription and contact information for City staff were posted on the City's website, and a number of comments were received via e-mail to City staff. The majority of comments were neighborhood-specific— routing recommendations and ideas for improvements, as well as trouble spots and missing links. A fair number of bicy- clists who commute into and out of Renton, as well as recrea- tional cyclists, made varied recommendations for regional- scale routes between Renton and its neighboring jurisdic- tions. On the whole, the public conveyed enthusiasm and support for the project and its recommendations. In addition to the public outreach, presentations by City staff and the project team were made throughout the project to the Parks Commission, Non-motorized Transportation Advisory Committee, City Council, and the Mayor. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 9 DRAFT GOALS, OBJECTIVES The Master Plan was developed in collaboration with both Transportation and Parks staff, reflecting the desire to create an interconnected network to accommodate both recreational and commuting uses, from pedestrians to cyclists, and im- prove mobility for non-drivers. With these concerns in mind, project goals and objectives were developed to guide the pro- ject. Project Goals • Enhance public awareness about the benefits of walk- ing, cycling and recreating for the individual and com- munity health. • Create a safe and convenient trails and bikeways net- work to provide both local and regional connectivity in order to increase bicycling and trail use. • Interconnect neighborhoods and local destinations: schools, parks, shopping, civic sites, and other local destinations, emphasizing route safety for less skilled riders/users. • Develop commuting routes between neighborhoods, employment and business centers, and transit facili- ties that will accommodate more skilled riders/users. • Capitalize on the convergence of the Lake Washing- ton Loop, Cedar River Trail and Interurban Trail in Renton and enhance the connectivity of the regional trail network by creating connections to proximate re- gional trails: the Green River Trail, Soos Creek Trail, Lake Youngs Trail, and the East Lake Sammamish Trail, as well as neighboring communities. • Increase use of hiking and water trails, parks and other recreational sites. • Promote bicycle safety, especially on shared road- ways, by increasing awareness among the driving public. • Update policies, ordinances and procedures to make opportunities for walking and bicycling. • Introduce cycling skills into school curriculum. 10 City of Renton , 1 DRAFT • Project Objectives ; - .fr I • Identify local and regional destinations in a non- 1� ', I ; i� iir motorized network, for both commuting and recrea- r___ - 1,1 , tional purposes. 11'111111'' ..' Iiiiiiiih7:�`;�. • Inventoryand evaluate existingnon-motorized -_-- ! it 1lili.„ . ' ,• routes, hiking and water trails. _ `.,,I t" Interurban and Green River Trail signs, • Identify missing links in the existing network to con- Fort Dent Park nect important destinations and complete routes. • Identify connections to regional trails. • ;•} • Identify a preferred network of routes. '� • Identify safety issues on existing and proposed ,-- ,'r�- `�' ` _� routes. - - -'' • Develop a methodology to prioritize improvements. may= -- • Ensure accommodation of a wide variation in users and trip purposes: pedestrians and all types of bicy- clists: long distance and`fast"cyclists, recreational, less-skilled riders, and children. �a • Create a safe and convenient trails and bikeways _. : � network thatprovides both local and regional con- , •-'• `: f'• nectivity. g ' . ,-�►'.. • Interconnect neighborhoods and local destinations: `'; .---L5I' � , ` schools, parks, shopping, civic sites, and other local -- x - ___. N' ~ destinations, emphasizing route safety for less r���-- _ - _ -:—�. `" "_ .te _,--. - `,mss skilled riders/users. ,.-J --7-_--------t-\„_ - • Develop commuting routes between neighborhoods, __\_,„ employment and business centers, and transit facili- ties that will accommodate more skilled riders/users. � � .� �s�, .�f, , , • Capitalize on the convergence of the Lake Wash- ."' _' 4,f '. 5 Itio��S ington Loop, Cedar River Trail and Interurban Trail ,. ' „, y� ` = .A.-14,"- ?,';' x in Renton and enhance the connectivity of the re- _„ ',;...---t•-,=".., .. ;. ;t � a- gional trail network by creating connections to proxi- ,,'-'� "' r '-' mate regional trails: the Green River Trail, Soos .= . Creek Trail, Lake Youngs Trail, and the future Ce- dar to Sammamish Trail, as well as neighboring ^- communities and future regional trails. Images from www.pedbikeimages.org/ Dan Burden,ITE Bicycle Pedestrian Council Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 11. •-- . , 1 . . PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS • . . . . • . . ._ - -.-...,::, ,...'..{....s. 71,. ' . .. :,...41,,e,'. • -• ifi,, , Iv. • , . .47 0 . . '.,••:L. -.. ; ' I .1 -- ..."'t 11'. NA i ...'.. ,,,,,,,i.ritri‘iiir„- ".4,...z.., . , • , .. ,si4 , • -,...,,)• ,, . . • .rp ,. 'L"I' • ' I . ,,, ',r.,......• . '• f t 1 ,E. •.c. .... • . ........ .. ....42. , •:,. .A., ,,7,..../ 0. . • '', .i ..i dr ,..4 *••,4 • ‘••• : .-• . 1..,,„..iti..?, .,,,,,Nty.,...,,,.. . ,., .. . : .,...... , .., . .,. ''.4•‘• • 't, .1 . •I i,-" ' r,.'f - •, ., • lk ,'a. ; • A of • 4 ' ;itT"'• ' i . 7`' • • • 4-,..j 4 45., . •• ,tle,• ...1'7. •ts,f , , A.. . '''' ,f .. lerrp,..•r • . •4, rik,.1”.. .__ / .' •' 'I \ 41,•'. • ; ., •': l•Ittr j i • • 4.. . '• e*.• ', •''. .•. lot .s*,.•••... _s. , .„ . I', ,- : ".\., 4. . , it.'I.i'''.._. ,4 :Ct.,..0_,'' I {1,,j, ".:...1'- - . . i•e' '• '4. . .P:'•-"••• 1.• -#er.L.%= .7 -'' ir;/: • 1111114• t..' `,, /TS. "Al, .....: 4t- ' - \ '-,- • . ••%-t • •. 4 0.ii4.-• ... 4 ..7444.kt... ' -' - 1.• • ',, , ..sji..iikeic: 14.' '• Y ''-'-:, .-f .1414. 4 •-.' ' t .4 .. i„ ,`•,1, • •-'13 i • t t z.V...r .S. 4:Of' r.,. 7.. 1 .. • ... '''''' V a. .• . A. • /t. ..1....' `r , • r t I . . ; , ,.•.., ltr. • 11. rd • 41. • ( :46 irti , 51A, ' '''‘ t . .'; ' .s'. 1 .'.., Vrd•, . , •tl* a \j'rri IN 4. 1. 1.a • .• . ' ,54 ,. ' d. 1.t •' • ,, • . ”, .... , . • .;;; •.' (. ,'Li- k‘ r 41, . , :44e. • 1 .4,f,,r.V• 1 , • • ''' '! • •-" ',. • , ...t.„ t . ' ' ' 9... " t •• '‘ '.- • .-t.A •,, , . -'''.2:'''..''' , •.'" . ' 4 i,.A, , , ,::.',- '"it- ) , '.. •••,...'. .. -•lyt., .1.•?.%.; ' V ,i ,:i .... ,, .. . 1./.1,, J.,,,,.II,..„, J.;•;• „ Atel...,„.?,:.,;:_t4" . 2 , ,. , i',.:4,,;,-;4te ,''di t 1 4.%,---: ' - ' . ii4•4fr!',1- Ait.... - :•-•.,-4;';'•-: . • r. _, -..#:1 . ,c„._.....1 k ., ;". 0 -' -,f,'• 04•'tit.4,A ' '`r..1f4-,--k•---z "•""7-..,-,.. • !if '. , ,.mr. - z , r.t..,.. •.1.4.„,. K .....4,!-_.4:"Itt,,,, '7.4e1.,.,;;-'.-rap'ir.: .'...!,i..-NIO;•.;.; r. .,,...- '4 r.:'•:.' .' ' 04. .ri V.t-• ^77.- --;••1 •,--•.:•-....*.„.*• - --• • -•_-,---. 71;- -.., .., r- , ;:V"*.?47;,.• _... : •Izs'•:'-'' r . ...........,_., '7.•••••:--A:.k•••••.••;_, , ,•*iti., b ,k.••.1 . . •X .. • , - - .... ,.--,,P,, • --s.-=-, . T 'S AO r t, .1!., . ..,:. - ' ' ,-.:1-....„,..H‘•:5----- "-. ''', 1., , . . .. .r., • - -- • . '..";.'.i,111 ii - . ,ii. • ',.:1-41 --- "••••-• latirto•-,4.7"v _ .L.. -, --:::.. • (41A0 ., .--7----'4,--- ----_ _-•• _ -- ,,'r,.. A•5' .,. ti :Otte F.,•. - -• -_ --- -.- % _ P, ' I ,n..... . 1., ,...___ ,,. . ....-....... - .„, •, -.." ..1 A ' -- -- -- ------- .- - .0..‘...'", 111r•••:::.-•,.......-------- -.-- .,..-.7...--._ -. ,.......----"---- 0 ..„„....._ -,-- --. _ -.. 1 ; d''--- -.- .. .1'' -- ....0e.--,..----......if= ,.. -. '.-L... ..'. ,..,...e...-, --- :......,_ . . .- .7.--__:,". smal....7-___-1-_,_-_--_-_ .. _ - _ . • - __...--.." ..... .._......-... -....o. ._____...,____. _ ____ ---Agolm....--.... ,- - -..... - . --. =1111.----- - -- - ...s......"- - --.-=" -..m,='•-• •----• , ....... ...."- , •••- .... "--••••....., , _ -......4•••' . 11.1111111.1.0•:, ..... ...-=wim..- _, .... "." ...Wk..: ,1441,„,,, ......., . , ... l'Ig" ....•• •.•• 4f*t;". 7...:..;2 7.".__ A.V' •'..=......rj F..... I r"4.4 rrz r... 2:0 i woo. . ....•""''''' "..... ""Cilier'....'-'......7.7" , . ................-Ait''.'...r...., -- ......- '''....:-.11.E.11 ._..._ -.4. • •\ .4-,--"' ...-.. , _., . - '- ""'• ' -49111*-.- ,. - ...." ' r..'"-- ..., ..k..........., ..... .., .. ..r.,.., f^,./.,k-P?4,--.,,,:, -,,,..•JgviltNr...... ...... ..-,-- :-• • ... . - ' -- .%••• ..-if•Tr.•.---.---3,.-"... •' ,--.1;-•.F-t,'•' '.- ' •41411101Co' -s141c.' .... • ",:!..-.;•:--. "7..,. --3t.,i-,...,..,„.i•,,,,••••••.• I* • • ....... -:•iy.,..t,"..f.,:...•": • .4%, " , 4.04011k -,-;.--:: • . ... - . . ' ''.-..*-4. • r lier-...g." mig.' -4,- 4100. sto-, , . . - • ' - ,-- !_: DRAFT PART 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS THE SETTING __ : y -. i,. ,.- • Renton is located on the south shore of Lake Washington, Y.: ,-4,•:.;` , where the Cedar River flows into the lake. The central part of .t ry ~ . -L i '% ='� -'', , M-'`; - the City and its older neighborhoods lie in the level area :VA-, : : - ` ' �; south of the lake, while the rest of the City is spread out on , z t . c► :' the slopes of Lake Washington, and hillsides above the Ce- -_,.--- -1. —, dar and Green River Valleys, as well as Honey, May, and T�=F'-'' =r� Panther Creeks. The river valleys and plateaus are gener- — - ally fairly level, and the roadways leading between these two - ."..---....i - .� A distinct topographical areas are steep. The population is roughly 80,000, and the city's footprint on the landscape is • xF,,,e.. just over 20 square miles. `r The City is centrally located within the Puget Sound environs, - ; * . nd is well connected to the rest of the region via Interstate d t, 1' N 405, and State Routes 167 (Valley Freeway), 169 (Renton E:=�-;., , • '- •d'`) Maple Valley Road), 515 (Talbot Road/Benson Drive South), !L: -_ and 900 (Sunset Boulevard/SE Renton-Issaquah Road). .ri As is often the case with major limited-access transportation 2-------- -__.... corridors, these routes divide the City into distinct areas and pose significant barriers to non-motorized travel due to the <- I,, great traffic volumes and limited crossing opportunities. In {„ �, ' x, , : .- , particular, 1-405, and SR 167, as well as the Cedar River, de- ' °= , marcate distinct neighborhood/planning areas and limit ac- , 'F ,'`'A. ,".` ' cess to non-vehicular traffic �;, �- • ' , fi f _ Several major local arterials, however, run north-south, and -. .�_ = ... provide alternative access to Seattle, Bellevue, Kent and r /z,, `` : points beyond. Rainier Avenue, Lake Washington Boulevard � x- /�' 4 ` , and Duvall Avenue are all popular bicycle routes for both ; ; y . 4' 1 commuters and recreational cyclists. - r,,.. . .' -may ' ( '! . ..:,'z'''' t%- t eef.. Renton is also well served byregional and local buses, , }.i " ' ;'� y 9 .>,,�,, , r- s, . - : through a hub-based transit system based at the downtown . �7 :� fi ., re�•*•'� : transit center. The RUSH (Renton Urban SHuttle) transports �ga- '?,n;.?tri..i.P.` 1,17,-....”- ....' - "`P commuters from downtown Renton to the City's major em- gel". - , ` ''f;"5. ployment sites. Sounder Commuter Rail and Amtrak ser- `'" . �` I vice, via'the current temporary and planned final Tukwila Sta- 4-Wale,- .4 , '`z tion at the Renton/Tukwila City line, make easy connections a . _" ' ,,"%;;'.. to Seattle's King Street Station and other points north and ,��,- :1 -� ,* south. This well-established transit network provides an ex- wok- Y, ,34 - - -' cellent opportunity to create and enhance linkages with the non-motorized network, thereby increasing the efficiency and usage of both modes of travel. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 15 DRAFT DESTINATIONS AND TRIP GENERATORS The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is about getting people where they want to go. A thorough analysis of where people 7. are coming from and where they need and want to go, there- , = fore, lays the framework to create a highly connective non- motorized and recreational network. The determination of -r, --v-----7:7,71,01 important destinations, neighborhood conditions and charac- ' ter, topography, natural features, and existing travel patterns ;�- .� and recreational routes are all part of this analysis. The Landing under construction As a means of organization, the Master Plan uses the geo- graphic planning areas designated in the 2003 Park, Recrea- tion and Open Space Implementation Plan, updated to reflect current annexations. The areas are divided by the most sali- '�`~ • , ., s, ent natural and manmade boundaries and for the most part form distinctive and fairly cohesive units in terms of topogra- _ : = - phy, land use, and transportation networks. '' CEDAR RIVER PAN A — The City's 6 identified planning areas, as shown in Figure 2, CLD-AR-RIVER TRAIL are: -- 1 • Central Planning Area • Southwest Planning Area • Southeast Planning Area Cedar River Park and Trail • North Planning Area • East Planning Area • West Planning Area The project limits for the Master Plan are Potential Areas of Annexation (PAAs), to accommodate potential future annexa- tions. Employment centers Renton is unique in that it has many major employers cen- trally located in or not far from the central business district. Some of the major employers are: • Central Planning Area (Urban Center Downtown, Ur- ban Center North): Boeing, PACCAR, Fry's Electron- ics, The Landing, including Target, Lowe's, and other "big box" retail, Renton Municipal Airport, Renton City Hall. • Southwest Planning Area (Valley): Green River Val- ley/Renton industrial area: Boeing Longacres, Valley Medical Center, IKEA, and various industrial, ranging from light to heavy. • East Planning Area: Sunset, East Renton, The High- lands 16 City of Renton DRAFT The advantage of these centrally-located employers is the GEOGRAPHIC PLANNING AREAS greater potential for residents to walk or bicycle to work, and these routes should be capitalized on. North Planning Parks and Recreation Area The City of Renton has a variety of parks, recreation sites Central and open space resources, both natural and developed that •fanning East are important destinations for its citizens. In addition to de- Area Planning veloped parks, recreation sites, and open space, the City has West Area a number of open spaces that are linear in character, provid- PlanningArea ing excellent opportunities for bicycling, walking, and hiking, and boating (water trails). Amongthese linear open spacesouthwes Southeast ) p S'fanning Planning g are: Lake Washington, the Cedar River, May, Honey, Spring- Area brook and Panther Creeks, in addition to several utility corri- dors that are currently used or have potential use for walking, hiking, and bicycling. Some highlights of the City's parks, recreation and open Figure 2. Geographic Planning Ar- space system: eas(from 2003 Park,Recreation,and Open Space Implementation Plan • 12.5 miles of existing trails • Two lake-front beaches along Lake Washington (Gene Coulon and Kennydale Beach) • Many park/recreation/civic sites, including: • A community center(at Cedar River Park) • Two library branches (downtown and in the High- lands) • An historical museum (downtown) • A sports park complex (Ron Regis Park along SR 169 and the Cedar River) • A skateboard park • An 18-hole public golf course • A central downtown park/Transit Center • A senior center(on the Cedar River). Schools Safe, convenient connections to schools are a primary build- ing block of a non-motorized network. Aside from the fact that children as well as older students are non-drivers, schools are the one destination that are very often close enough to homes to enable walking or biking. Renton has over 20 schools. With an area of about 20 square miles, that equates roughly to a school in every square mile of City. In terms of walkable catchment area (or"ped shed"), deter- mined as the area encompassed in a 5-10 minute walk, (see Figure 4), that puts many schools in walkable or bike-able range of many of Renton's citizens. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 17 J� T al- y - .,. a pry `ll`."f Pi.-'...1) +� ) r Y ` z •,r N":. l' � j� "s.�,� '(''.?;-'--12.4',1?' {�$?�'I:illli ,t 1 ' i2•rv�9' •¢ Y - 'f'1e, Pil t- u,' fr t !� ,--,tz1,,:.'l', 1 ` ,,'.iy !" e.•,,'- t9 ,4T cf,,,,p-,1-„,:....."fI1 3tiy. '- fl i^51�1-fix , `initr1I r 444��'G t =./?11,1' i -;W' a' •�4. •I'''' I Aij; r.•v /t.,;1:, fl: i'i� 'r .. ."5`. dR e Mv, ,i),:-A.'4.'1, r 4} �-�'� �*,`I L e 1,.,_, 10 .,/(' . x t ,,:l., 'col�s i.+ �'i H, `'- '.`g' 1 „� �� , .' � '��� _ _ 1! Vis`+�1 �� _ 1 z. '....7..4•,,� t ,�,�, 'r• � " 1' ,j F dr1,,..-1c,,'.'(44-: ia*epk�. �" 1M1 y1 1,llY -rc^t t,(4 ..1 ,`• R' - J ''ate. '19x.151j !). . tf 1�1=, .Cnc 4. i ` Y ,ti1-4 t, 't , ,iser..w„,:-;,. j� 1�'"�-` ;SN h �` '4 c. - e;C..L IJ&kS;YC :` y F..Jfl1 1r a:1 i g"•, 41: �'� L.'.'' , Y''L t-''. *+ - a C,�" .tt ��.4t, '}�,,..r Liu. - �: �a'.`i Is' .`i o., >�!�e;�I_ ... _` 'M„ "'YY ... ..`�rii �. r1t L�' t _ 4_,e, x ,'st :e l �� by e i.�h, --, .' 1'.?�� uTtor tr.11''40,0, .ie itt ?� f j r� �"` �# r- �c—•.J., It{l�l;,t ,r -," /.;+�*'. (r 1: ;",,, ,,.---k2- `'. f .V. ,t A�C� ,1„1 .fi1jr✓`, - fr' R; '.-•t';= �, !' ''.�b''' ._• ''s-'. a .il ''' -, ,,, _ A .� ." ; DRAFT Organizations like the National Center for Safe Routes to "PED SHED" School attest that safe non-motorized routes provide multiple benefits, from personal and public health to reducing vehicle * Defined as the walkable area miles traveled, providing traffic calming and enhanced around an origin or destination neighborhood livability. * Walkable area is considered to be '/a to'/2 mile,the distance most See Appendices C, D, and E for maps of Renton, Issaquah, people are willing to walk in 5-10 and Kent Schools. minutes * It takes the average able-bodied Other destinations Some other notable destinations in Renton, both for its citi- person about 15-20 minutes to zen's and for the larger regional community include: walk one mile • Black River Riparian Forest • Henry Moses Aquatic Center • IKEA "Ped Shed" Renton Civic Theater or Walkable Catchment Area •• Renton History Museum • Renton IKEA Performing Arts Center • Renton Technical College • CARCO Theater • Farmer's Market Origin '- nation Dest atlon • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park See Figure 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facili- 1/4 mile ties. Uc 1/2 mile 10 min.w• EXISTING TRAILS AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Figure 4. The Cedar River Trail, the keystone of the City's non- motorized network, runs through the heart of the City and of- fers both a rural and urban experience for both pedestrians and bicyclists. Across the City, existing trails, mostly soft- , surface or rough (undeveloped) along the City's numerous creeks and utility corridors, provide ample walking trails for pedestrians. The situation for bicyclists is different. Bike lanes are few and nearly always discontinuous (not linking to other bike lanes or non-motorized facilities), as are separated multi-use trails. Some signed shared-use roadways exist, but often are not contiguous with other bicycle facilities. Below is an inventory of existing non-motorized facilities in and around Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 19 L 1 SE IIM Si m� Ifta NE...6„,-.7`,..-..--,i Legend , , , ERCER - es. . 4 e _\ 9 Destinations Code '1 sam?A°°�" ram 1wLar�ooaa O'' .,S P,mn,.Rpm R.a. Freeway • Park / wnw. Pi4 '"Nra�i'`- r4Qymol • r LAND��,,140 -��„ TWIN ® Arterial Street • School Palo. BIIn Aw 6E .LfL 1BurtJr Parh • W -- , Local Street Civic Site i Isla.y w., E�" C SE.• sl La.y •er n Trail (Library,Post Office, A°"` ``+. r o < • %. - c""' '\�`..4,r'o° CInterstateFw Hospital,Fire Station,9 crr raa.y 4an s L `• ^"a G.r,Pa 1 ti �' , Y etc)L. a i ,. 1NCASTLE' r-- e7a State Highway1 • Major Employment Site is;„ "" i' ir C • SE:arsl E. ..,"°^ Renton Ci Limltstea �. _ §H m . •ea.E,a 'E. . g . r�! 4' Transit Ctr/Park&Ride m '�mhj6 '' u>,q - -;Potential Areas of N ' Ga''e1.arGmh 'J� .ner p' a ( ramst • •Annexation 1 1 _Gr.,.�r .0 Cm= _ a ve, r\ ao.a.Tsk '4', a'" vvagh1c1c0°` �_I4,— •J w ,_s Tr01 .Pe.•x,Y w�1��a �7 '.NE t,--I ' .. - ,in SE if. 1 .. 'yam y (� Ee�•�e..w �''yyn°"d�-,' •• !'� ^I - .`1 HapY Cmcr�ryl�.o -:-. f rd. -1 ! 9 1m. Pra ,'•GrvaMal , LrtNt Pah _. — s. • ym^ •....g l'. (;) rmp>a Ma �i 6 �c NRPSCAIE 1:16.000 VArk 98aw0r6r .-••••',93\ • 4 d, Z N <"a"1a°"Per°i -- SOURCE:Ca d' 'On.Co.•G6 Center 3001 • ,a Pan ., Yy• 4 ,\ 'kw •., ,1 . • L•:•_ b neral , '0. 0'IR ) ._Cason'� ` NE Ina l..a� '�� �� • ... , ..Grk 1 0' 9e"M ( \ 'I • •' Prv�ml<- Got PI.„°' " r •0w�5�(�� �._....r Ia211..e '�, /r i . ` a,�_�D'1a _ lit 'M.a I etK•1•-.. ^�\_ \` __l • +aa� :, N°^un a <1 bug y^ oI k - C = Nyc+.y a •, W /--� ,, •' Ir 'IER4T 1 PN}!`• - € ,4 •. ra.n o_ • ' < f CPaeuH Pa2�3 mL m 9.yr g 4 W.+ Gem t U „7,.,,,,, ', $ 1113 Tal..a. pp rm L q• y NE 4m SI caro. NE 4.191 81n ..R. B./. G�: i t uw�..��© 9iyyyli���..•� SSL , yp i. t� \ _ yuntP.a6. •'aam-a (P^�3 'i eN.mma' �� Doren $ 7f w ; ` r aei.c s i x02,54 • 6.�m ''1 r""1:... 'a ' L , PN Yr. -• g�BUi SI Q.. \.\\ E• r $ 'ruining r '� ` .. . . l °A' a 3 .i .df •S m8E mal `\ R nP' 5"—.'•. .. • (Ira h,.•• �'eieyn WM 1 112.•µltr ` , •.., _u y�p l EI)rm 811 r i. P. _ ••'`\ T. [[ W[] nn' •• 1 a r.ae -.now noon.- 6Ja SF.f4leT. Y 1--�Y ed-. I ,a. _ :g SOS. +.lnJP,aaPa P•••... • :�'�' ' EE.41M9 '2fdP r g L \ 2 ue9i ev"ik ir�.r •„�'unP.�.any.__ 9111.91 �� 6 w! a. =,.. •l ear M.\�� ._�__._�( se r4.mnr I �` � i 1 "trill ` . I L a�g41r 8 i u..a 1 Lt".."''Cus.a' .._ _ , r A -_ M, e � H 1 i it ti,rye. �t ,,,r w—•ems Pm4 ••-o... 7....:........... F I 5pn�Y ,:.P. .. h.' __ a •''' •`'%�Nrwr Pan _ [ I I 06a.i• 6T { N •"46 paM1 a TPmyi. ,PXarq Fra% _ r!' ,I•`BE n r"�. .i 1�-� �., . 9,./O eta G\1 fli •� ._t 81 --...•PY1.........i (_` 1, Ns�a� � � { ,1` J L Ik s,--,____„___. 1 Din ' \ • •,�, ' r! r 1 ::7"---- . i — ..,.....,.../ • y' w� • owl • r .; 1 .:..1 -a T.W r [m.:a, ` !-• E U SF ta4mWG 0.r°`.,n• ,. \` L�-�.y1�' r - , - ° P.. I 4• '•SP 31.1 Sr V Sr IGLin9i I raR9Dop n'mi` �- inure ex, I _,� 1�, 1 . PA } )(T: 8E O6m 91 1a ', - ; �•1" f Lau Dain"(E( ( a r��s I • `. .� .fit ,�{�f -1. `,`\ _ Pelmaf�'bMy i \ '+ _ _ ]Na;e' Y, t"__ L-;.:401101 94 Wc,i is XPi 1. y y SN*e y I` „.....,,,.'-.X yemy y t J.:^sd'•\\ �'I`+ r r• _ (' L.. 1 5 l�`` I 1 =,.n R-..• ; IIS __ 8E .81<' ( SE 192/VISI , r °. 6pµy.o.h .` k ees srowrsl r "e 1Ci,—L'• "?-7"'a. \ bop, � w rme,r.r - ..' +• I s ream s, 4 w l Creak ' P.rra ` \ 4 se* (� .a usm91:ae..'vij `\ ¢ LNi° .p, i)/ ; / P. ••• _ a:l Vanmsno. r .J,•v,t'"•;� Lna.x1Y.Re • J KENT t i r - �- 9300�i 9t��� ���^ \bE]IIIm SI �•� _ 1 � J w i _P n II n /\ s sercros s s `E��p.4 P= j a•Var. \ m T�new —i-- fsr\mnsly i-1� Ea. ... rn .� `) I ',Cry -' .S,,1[1,St 'ASt . _ ,.6"9- w ii w SEYlat[. q \ b]I&n\bl m b11E'SI `J`� PahPUvum SAS5fl,\ , ��mm Trap t' `- `L1l 1 \ \'''N''‘'''''.' Q , \ r\ \ Yefe \ \L--? w \ \\ w.yasa,e _ of -j (n..,...�L: E� l L' �\ .. Figure 5. Destinations and Existing Non-motorized Facilities , R ' DRAFT SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAILS: • Cedar River Trail also listed below under"Creeks and Greenway Corridors," (pedestrian-only section be- tween North 6th Street and the Lake Washington : ' „ o�: Shoreline) � ' , `., , c, ! • Burnett Avenue South, Burnett Place South (Burnett Linear Park) — • _. Garden Avenue North and North 8th Street Trail (along PACCAR property) - _—_ _ - , _ �- • Ripley Lane Strander Boulevard Burnett Avenue South •• Springbrook and Soos Creek Trails, also listed below under"Creeks and Greenway Corridors" y�r BIKE LANES: [�,. '" x31''' / • SW 16th Street �( • Oakesdale Avenue South :�s M. .° :< NO71, • Monster Road SW .i^j"41z. ; 4,. .a. �' • Duvall Avenue NE '�;. ` ��: • Rainier Avenue North (alongside Renton Municipal -fes_ Airport) • Lake Washington Boulevard North, north of Gene SW 27th Street Coulon Memorial Park • Logan Avenue North • 140th Ave SE (King County) • NE 4th/SE 128th Street (Renton and King County) • Talbot Road South (south of 43`d Street) DESIGNATED SHARED USE ROADWAYS: • Airport Perimeter Road • Taylor and Hardie Avenues SW CREEK AND GREENWAY CORRIDORS: • Cedar River Trail • Honey Creek Trail • Black River Trail • Springbrook Trail (multi-use) • May Creek Greenway • Soos Creek Trail (multi-use) WATER TRAILS—LAUNCH AND LANDING SITES (Lake to Locks Water Trail) • Cedar River Boathouse • Gene Coulon Park • Cedar River Trail park • Riverview Park Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 21 f i DRAFT L_ r `` UTILITY CORRIDORS: ) • r " ;�:,,. • PSE right-of-way through SE Renton, the "Tower of _r___,,,___:„2„,_-_ f '+ Power"trail system (informal walking and mountain !' l biking trails) .'- [' c �i i } -< :; • Seattle-Mercer Island Waterline Right-of-Way ��y.Y "PACCAR Trail"along Garden Avenue North and North 8th St. ik rf"jy l 4.),:`-',,.: 4; , r k j INN* r"_f r� �r .II IrJt ,. '11;'. 11 aj ir .1't�,. •ar Black River Riparian Forest trailhead, Naches Avenue SW I_ 1 ' s I ,, 1 22 City of Renton ' 4 DRAFT PLANNING AREA EVALUATIONS =_ s �` - - • Area character and Issues `" "' • Transit Routes ~ " '•_ • Existing Bicycle and Walking Routes " • Opportunities Central Planning Area ;j Renton's Central Planning area is a diverse area that in- cludes the central business district (downtown), an industrial ` . area, and a residential neighborhood. The area is bounded Boeing and The Landing under con- by 1-405 to the south and east, Lake Washington to the north, struction and Rainier Avenue North (SR 167)to the West, and is tran- sected by the Cedar River. The street pattern of the industrial area, home to major em- ployers The Boeing Company and PACCAR, is an elongated grid, with some large industrial parcels. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway tracks run along the east and west edges of the area, serving the industrial areas. The topogra- phy is flat. Some of the area is transitioning to commercial central use, with big-box retail and mixed-use development through Area Planning The Landing and Southport developments. The evolution of the area from industrial to a mix of retail, commercial, and residential land uses will bring more bicyclists and pedestri- ans to the area. Downtown Renton has a gridded street pattern with walkable 11111 block sizes, and has an economic vitality with small shops, businesses, and restaurants. Two pairs of one-way couplets provide through access through downtown, South 2nd and South 3rd Streets (SR 900 through downtown), running east- west, and Williams and Wells Avenues South, running north- south. Two distinctive features of the area: the BNSF rail corridor which passes through downtown in southwesterly- northeasterly direction, and Burnett Avenue South (also a former rail corridor)which runs north-south and forms a di- vided boulevard with park blocks in between. Also notable are the centrally located Piazza Park and Renton Transit Center. At the northern-most part of downtown lays the Renton Mu- nicipal Airport, Renton High School and the IKEA Center for the Performing Arts, forming larger blocks. The single-family residential neighborhoods are south of downtown and between the Cedar River and the industrial area to the north. The street network is a continuation of the downtown street grid, and there are four streets that bridge the river (Logan, Williams and Wells Avenues North and Bronson Way North). Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 23 DRAFT W-494 Waterfront • - , Safe, convenient north-south non-motorized access around • Lake Washington is lacking despite the fact that this makes - • up' ' �' • up part of the Lake Washington Loop, an important and heav- + ' _ ` °" ""7`" ' ily-used regional bicycle route. The area between the inter- --- a nter- as ' section of the Airport Perimeter Road/ Logan Avenue North ? ► and Gene Coulon Park is a missing link in the regional trail 451,4 network. A separated multi-use trail linking the east and west shores of Cedar River Trail at Logan Avenue Lake Washington would provide the most benefit to bicyclists North Bridge and pedestrians. However, large industrial parcels and their access needs (by roadway and rail), existing river crossings, substantial north-south traffic volumes, and the basic physical constriction of space make this a challenging area for non- motorized improvements. In terms of river crossings, the Boeing Bridges, the northern • at the mouth of the river and the southern near North 6th - . Street are permitted through State Department of Natural Re- ;,,; :° , sources to Boeing, and the permit restricts use by others. �;'`` The bridges' purpose is to allow airplanes to be hauled be- i„ t tween the Boeing Renton Plant and the Municipal Airport. 0. !u' '•911 • '; fµ' ;t1 , d' The Logan Avenue Bridge has a narrow separated lane for '• �� "11.W "6' • r-s pedestrians, but its width, approaches, and grade separation from the Cedar River Trail below make it a poor choice for 'w bicyclists. Downtown South 3rd Street, downtown As mentioned above, connections between regional trails are best accomplished with separated multi-use trails. Given that downtown Renton is probably the most fully built-out area of the city, flexibility and creativity will be required to achieve this aim. In addition, as the center of the City's commerce, parking is obviously a critical need, and something that is hugely valued by merchants. Squeezing non-motorized improvements into the existing urban fabric of downtown will also require creativ- ity, and likely some trade-offs. Downtown improvements in the bicycle and pedestrian net- work have the potential to bring great benefit to the City, in- cluding increased transit use; possible reductions in vehicle trips and demand for vehicular parking; and significantly, in- creased commerce. Such enhancements would likely boost the City's visibility, reputation and allure throughout the re- gion. 24 City of Renton DRAFT EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PE- DESTRIANS: 7 • Cedar River Trail (bicycle access ends north of North - 4''•;= 6tn Street) • Lake Washington Boulevard/Gene Coulon Park c '' (northbound and southbound) •_- �- �` • Houser Way North (southbound and northbound) • Garden and Park Avenues North • • Lake Washington Loop Trail (parallel to 1-405 west of - Ripley Lane) 3= • Burnett Avenue North (Burnett Linear Park) Ped/Bike Lane, Logan Avenue North Bridge • various other low volume streets yI --�1" • ;ss l: rt- "icy I r�l• TRANSIT ROUTES: • South 2nd and South 3rd : ` • Rainier Avenue South #78 ( =- c\= • South/SW Grady Way • 1a • South/SW 7th Street - 4 • Park Avenue North - - ` - ._ . • Bronson Way North • Park Avenue North/NE Park Drive Piazza Park, downtown OPPORTUNITIES: w4 • • - • Lower-volume streets (some one-way) such as Wil- liams, Wells, Garden, P arallel the main north-south h -= -, routes, Logan and Park Avenues, and could provide ;- : j.. #1 good non-motorized access and connections. r �- � ,;- , 'F., • 3rd, 4 , 6th Avenues as east-west routes. • Possibility of grade separation between pedestrians • and bicycles via street right-of-way that parallels the ! ; '` zr Cedar River Trail and the bank above the river(North 11 - , _ Riverside Drive). South 2nd Street&Renton High School • Potential availability of Renton High School property adjacent to Logan for a segment of separated trail. • The eventual need to upgrade the Logan Avenue Bridge and include a dedicated bike-pedestrian trail. • Possible redevelopment of the BNSF rail corridor. • Long-term redevelopment of Liberty Park, as identi- fied in the Tri-Park Master Plan, providing a potential opportunity to install new pathways around the pe- rimeter of the park. • A route for the Two Rivers Trail, utilizing SW 7th/South 7th Street (see West Planning Area, below), Shattuck Avenue South, and Houser Way South, with the fol- lowing additional opportunities: • Potential near-term and/or long-term redevelopment of Houser Way and the BNSF corridor. • Low-volume Shattuck Avenue South as another direct Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 25 DRAFT ,( A-'--- thoroughfare through downtown. - 9: L • Burnett Avenue South as a core pedestrian route. '_ Connection with transit via the Renton Transit Center. i .. u '-- ( 1N�‘;-'ru i • The Williams and Wells Avenues South one-way cou- I" _'x"' '. :, plet as a direct thoroughfare through downtown. h` ,1.; g-_ -- '-' 11 ' • Downtown bicycle and pedestrian amenities: wayfind- � y ing signage, information kiosks, benches, access to ;• restrooms, etc. Renton Transit Center Southwest Planning Area The Green River Valley makes up most of Southwest Renton. It is bounded by the Valley Freeway (SR 167) on the east, .r '"'`'1a� ' ;.1''�''`� Renton/Tukwila Citylimits on west(also the Interurban Trail n {� s � � + � ,1t b t lir ; and Green River), Martin Luther King, Jr.Way/SW Sunset d :' 4 ; •'" � VP4t;t1tii,''' Boulevard (SR 900)to the north, and SW 43rd and the Renton �, 1i► isiyr;_ , City limits to the south. ft t ' . sgip. ea; ' m.® ,r= .)� t.11 " The area has flat topography and consists mostly of large -!'• y.�.,�• :->.:.!44, •.,, ;-71f414- .,-.14-4_'' 4. _4 .4 industrial-zoned parcels, with a rectilinear street pattern. The )j(^�~.;£�'A, >, _; •14r- p,�"� area also features a network of wetlands, along Springbrook :40-7031'-J, •'t ,� __:1-0) 1 Vi Creek and the Springbrook Trail. Black River Riparian Forest trailhead, The Southwest Planning area, with its recently redeveloped Naches Avenue SW streets; proximity to existing passenger rail and future light rail (via Tukwila Station), regional trails in neighboring Tuk- wila, and the Springbrook Trail is one area where non- motorized transportation is gaining a foothold. Existing bike lanes in the area connect together, as well as to the Black River and Springbrook Trail, providing access to recreational resources, walking trails, and Tukwila Station, and regional bike commuting routes. P4*----c- EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PE- DESTRIANS: • SW 16th (bike lanes) • SW 27th (separated shared use trail, west end) n • Oakesdale Avenue SW (bike lanes) So�tl est • Springbrook Trail Tanning11116111111.1.Area • The Interurban Trail TRANSIT ROUTES: • Lind Avenue SW • SW 16th Street • SE 43rd Street 26 City of Renton T DRAFT OPPORTUNITIES: r' • Extension of SW 16th bike lanes to connect with trap- =-,T -_ sit route on Lind Avenue SW. .`< „. .t • Extension north and south of Oakesdale Avenue SW ,- ' bike lanes to connect with the Springbrook Trail. :- • Planned Strander Boulevard/SW 27 Street connec- -,, tion between Renton and Tukwila. ,-„� • Connections with Tukwila's non-motorized routes. ‘ -' --- • Missing links within the Springbrook Trail System. `-- u J - Houser Way South, west of Burnett Avenue South West Planning Area The West Planning area is bounded by the Renton City Limits to the north and west (bisected by Martin Luther King, Jr. Way/SW Sunset Boulevard/SR 900), 1-405 to the south and a 4t, Rainier Avenue/SR 167 to the east. It is the smallest planning 4s� ' A � area, and its most notable feature is the Black River Riparian ,. �� `w �: Forest, a remnant riparian forest with walking trails and a ¢,- ;, ,14 4;, heron rookery, surrounded by industrial parcels. The Indus- '- - :._,3r ; trial area is South of SW Sunset Blvd/SR 900, and is criss- t-,r' ' crossed by railroad corridors and spurs. North of SW Sunset '-''t �, • n - '", ; -^ -� Blvd/SR 900, a residential neighborhood rises above the cityilii on the hillsides of the Green River Valley. : J -0,•-',....-4„., The hilly terrain of this area poses access challenges: both SW 7th Street getting to and from downtown and points north as well as get- ting around the neighborhood. Unlike other areas of the City, the existing street network does not have a regular and ex- tensive system of collectors and arterials providing through- access. Industrial area The industrial area south of SW Sunset Boulevard/SR 900 has excellent potential to provide connections between The Green River, Interurban and Cedar River regional trails, be- tween Tukwila and Renton, and to make connections with downtown Renton, particularly through the railroad corridors. The trail in Black River Riparian Forest and the Springbrook Trail and bikes lanes on Monster Road already provide some est pill”, connectivity. Extending the east-west connection would be Planning l nni g ideal. rea In terms of the connection of existing regional trails; there isnillF" an excellent opportunity to close the missing link between the Green River Trail and Renton via railroad right-of-way and Fort Dent Park. The "Fort Dent Connector,”which would link the Green River Trail to Renton, has been identified in sev- eral regional non-motorized planning documents as a high priority connection. Linkages between regional trails, and this Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 27 DRAFT -"'�•��: ' . connection in particular, were also identified through public : `• ) ', comment at project open houses. ''° �- A multi-use trail to the Black River Riparian Forest, adjacent to the existing railroad and connected it to SW 7th via Naches _.• _ I }.� would make connections the east. The SW 7th corridor has a lot of potential, preferably as a separated multi-use trail and ; could become an excellent connection to downtown. Neighborhoods Monster Road SW near Waterworks This area is hilly, making it challenging for bicycle access, Park even on the designated shared use routes, Hardie and Tay- lor. The major arterial in the area is Renton Avenue South, ' k which is considered moderately bicycle friendly along some • , ' of its length. r'�- - - ` •y 1 - _ • ' - EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PE- fl - DESTRIANS:• Monster Rd (bike lanes) : o =; • SW 7th Street ..�, • Black River Trail (walking trail) Green River at Fort Dent Park • Springbrook Trail (multi-use trail) • Taylor and Hardie Avenues SW (shared use) -- . ,rte r • TRANSIT ROUTES: ? • MLK Jr.Way South/SW Sunset Blvd (SR 900) i ' - • SW 7th Street s ,' • • SW Grady Way 1-4' ? .� OPPORTUNITIES: , • Two River Trail (see Central Planning Area, above). Taylor Avenue Northwest • Fort Dent Connector to connect the Green River Trail and Renton. • Conversion of undeveloped path alongside railroad corridor in Black River Riparian area. • Continuation of separated multi-use trail from Black River Riparian area down Naches to SW 7th. • Possibility for a separated multi-use trail along SW 7th Street to connect to downtown. • Extension north and south of Oakesdale Avenue SW bike lanes to connect with the Springbrook Trail. • Renton Avenue South as a connection to Seattle. • Future extension of Chief Sealth trail through the utility corridor. 28 City of Renton DRAFT Southeast Planning Area (AKA Talbot/ Benson/ Fairwood/ Soos Creek) Steep hillsides rise up from the Green River Valley and Cedar River corridor. The southeast planning area sits above these • 4* two rivers, and borders on downtown. It is bounded by The Valley Freeway (SR 167) on the west, 1-405 to the north, the Cedar River to the northeast, and Renton City limits to the south and east. The terrain is hilly and is transected by utility corridors: Puget Sound Energy transmission lines and the Seattle-Mercer Is- Southeast land Waterline. The area is predominantly residential, with ( Planning some commercial/retail nodes along the arterials. Arterials Area curve, sometimes in response to topography, and are some- what discontinuous; local streets form inwardly-focused neighborhood units. On the northeast side, The Cedar River Natural Area forms a sloped, wooded boundary between these neighborhoods and the Cedar River. Panther Creek and its wetland complex run parallel to SR 167 at the bottom of the west slope. Thunder Hills Creek flows toward 1-405 and downtown from the southeast to the northwest. The area has several pockets of multi-family housing that would surely benefit from improved connections. The primary east-west route, SW 43rd Street/SE Carr Road/ SE 176th/Petrovitsky Road, though long, is steep in places and has a cross section that changes several times along its approximately 6-mile length. At the same time, multiple utility corridors in the area have the potential to provide miles of trails across the area. Pro- viding a balance of destination-oriented non-motorized facili- ties as well as recreational ones will be the challenge in Southeast Renton. There are several major north-south routes connecting to Kent and beyond: Talbot Road, Benson Road/108th Ave SE (SR 515), 116th Avenue SE, and 140th Avenue SE. EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PE- DESTRIANS: • Cedar River Trail (on north side of the river east of the Cedar River Natural Zone) • 140th Ave SE (existing bike lanes) • Benson Road South • Puget Drive SE • SE 164th • Talbot Road South (existing bike lanes south of SW 43`d/179th/Carr Road SE • Hiking/walking trails in Cedar River Natural Zone Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 29 DRAFT TRANSIT ROUTES: • 108th Ave SE • 116th Ave SE • Puget Drive SE • SE 168th Street • SE Carr Road • SE Fairwood Boulevard • SR 169 Renton-Maple Valley Road • Talbot Road South OPPORTUNITIES: • Expansion of existing soft-surface or rough path/ trails in utility corridors. • Connections with Cedar River Natural Area. • Safe walk-to-school routes (Renton Park Elementary, Talbot Hill Elementary, Nelson Middle School, Cas- cade Elementary, Tiffany Park Elementary). • Regional trail connections: Interurban/Green River Trails and Soos Creek Trail, Soos Creek and the Ce- dar River Trail, Lake Youngs Watershed Trail. • Connections with Kent and points south via 116th Ave SE and 132nd/140th Ave NE. • Panther Creek wetlands. • Trail along Thunder Hills Creek. • Trail along Panther Creek wetlands, connecting to the Edlund Property and onto the Springbrook Trail. • Pedestrian trails from multi-family areas to shopping areas. • Good overlap between transit and proposed non- motorized transit routes. -' North and East Planning Area (Kennydale/Sunset/ East Plateau/Cedar River) Though two separate planning areas, divided by Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900, The North and East planning areas 1'1°21" are grouped together for the purposes of this Master Plan st because they are more contiguous and interconnected than Planning1� Area other planning areas. The East Planning area is bounded by Maple Valley Road (SR 169)to south, 1-405 and Lake Wash- ington on the west, and Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900 to the north. The North Planning area is bounded by Lake Wash- ington to the west, Sunset Boulevard NE/SR 900 to the south, the May Creek corridor/May Creek urban separator and Renton City Limits to the north, and the Renton City Lim- its to the east. The terrain is hilly and slopes steeply to Lake Washington on the west and the Cedar River to south. It is primarily residen- tial, with commercial retail nodes and along the arterials, es- 30 City of Renton DRAFT pecially NE 3rd/NE 4th Street and NE Sunset Boulevard/SR ,, 900. _ Like the South Planning Area, topography presents a chal- •;; y,--- •.;';:•:,', '. lenge to non-motorized travel in the North Planning Area, and ;, . Va.. =21r currently limits connections between this area, downtown and _1_,„ ~ -- -----1 Interstate 405 and its impact on nearby arterials and collec- I - _ tors also limit east-west access. . The east-west routes, Sunset Boulevard NE and NE 3rd and 1 --- 4th Streets, are busy commercial streets, with higher traffic Benson Road South volumes, higher speeds, and many access points into the strip-type commercial development lining the streets. How- _ ever, there are some routes parallel to these thoroughfares )(1";.�' r`? i'. 1 J R.L.,. t that can provide alternative access, even if these tend to be -,'I'',',\ ,,,A,4:4,, ,: short, discontinuous segments. 7: / Vit" g ^. tit `C ;��p Multiple parallel north-south routes (Edmonds, Monroe, Union - • �a•\ � .. and Duvall Avenues NE) could make fora highly connective - - '='`" - non-motorized network, and provide opportunities to connect 1, - - with the area's many civic resources. _ EXISTING ROUTES CURRENTLY USED BY BICYCLES AND PE- "Tower of Power"Trail nearPhilipAr- DESTRIANS: fold Park • Cedar River Trail ---- •, • May Creek Trail �- ;•`; DRAFT OPPORTUNITIES: • NE 10th and NE 12th Streets as bypass routes to Sun- - a' set Boulevard. _: WI:T.'` • Connections to good distribution of neighborhood • parks. _ • Connections to May and Honey Creek Trails, Cedar • River Trail. • Safe walk-to-school routes (Maplewood Heights, _ Hazen High School, McKnight Middle School). -_.-' • • Existing trails and planned development of the Honey Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Creek, May Creek, and Kennydale Creek corridors. line along the shoreline of Lake Wash- ington • Good overlap between transit and possible non- motorized transit routes. • Possible redevelopment of the areas as a result of the Highlands Subarea Plan. • Connections to Bellevue, Newcastle and Issaquah. of"; ` ' • Several scenic longer rural routes: SE May Valley Road, SE Jones Road. • g .,;;5.•t yf • Long term redevelopment of the BNSF railroad corn- dor. • " `^';ice. �Ii. <.:; 71;6 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad line along the shoreline of Lake Wash- ington 32 City of Renton PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS . : . r� •,a• - 4- "?yam„ ; •./• , yrs , stir 7 ` '3 ( I" f tl� . . y, 1 J,J J 1, it• �.�'Tit. t{ Ss�rt'-" x fff.��..ff F-,tt 1 i 41; I -.,. •.17. D'. „k ms �_ {,f�4 �„,,,,yy�r►� .rIC ' fit � ; ..J.i rt--. .'',"4.1.,, "���" f.4 "'. 'fir!..., r ./ •"'� / i 1 ¢+ �.y, �� .i...,' � ' r r ` s7 `R` "'i' ; :f, h 4.-•-Nk • '�' ,-,--,,..N% J�, ,f," ++:. ."'SJ'�,` 'q' 'Ste' • �` tea �•'r �,I• •Ya -ljR•,►r. t 4'R 'o`; .t{ .r• if . i t 7 ;. d 'J�r' r.. ,' fir• < •• ? f.. '( • A. 1 J Lrj% +its • ..Aid* % ' , '•J w ..�..C'"T!'?. �i,,, t „. •4'*. i 1 - .--1 T , t ,• •t a # ^N r •A•�..._r� ii '.•'�Mt'' -o I" 4 .` .`y'< ' M .i-'i.P.. �� .1.41 J 1 • L'( L� 4,T .' '!.`• Y�*4S-JLL. bbl._ C. r, 1r• Y�••,s,Sd .�: • y'e4-Ii ';'. 4"T� i y;Y "(, O' `,' ;!`r3y" 4,-." , pl v t' , ,+ 4 N►• ''s' .'S y r 1 7,,, J•. ,iro F i yS_� ._ ,;.mss r1 77'dp'l ,•i^- J. '0-'t ~ 1 �} K , • i• ' d, DRAFT PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS ROUTING In developing Renton's proposed non-motorized network, it was helpful to think about different categories of routes in or- der to ensure coverage to all kinds of destinations, as well to determine which trail cross-section is most appropriate. Primary Routes � --`—T.-_�, •---_- _® Primary facilities provide regional connections through and TYPES OF ROUTES within Renton. Because of the longer distances these facili- * PRIMARY: ties traverse, they will constitute the highest mileage of facili- ties in the system. Examples include the Lake Washington through routes, connecting city to Loop and the Cedar River Trail, both of which are designated city regional trails by King County. * SECONDARY: Primary facilities were selected based on the following crite- connecting neighborhood to ria. The facility should: neighborhood * MINOR: • Provide continuous connection between major portals to the CBD/downtown/City Center when completed connections within the neighbor- Serve and connect with the public transportation sys- hoods • tern • Avoid high traffic arterials and state highways unless no other feasible direct connection exists • Avoid roadways posted at speeds over 40 miles per hour unless no other feasible direct connection exists • Avoid major hills whenever possible. Secondary Routes Secondary facilities provide subarea/neighborhood connec- tions meant to augment the primary trail system. Typically, they serve smaller commercial, residential, or employment centers, or locations that are not connected by primary facili- ties. .As with primary facilities, these facilities may also cover longer distances. An examples would be a trail in utility corri- dor. Secondary facilities should: • Connect the CBD to neighborhoods, major parks, and recreation centers • Provide alternative connections to areas served by the primary trail system if either of the following crite- ria apply: • Provide a connection between two primary facilities that otherwise would not be connected Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 35 DRAFT • Provide access to points of interest and scenic fea- tures/destinations that otherwise would not be served by the primary trail system. Minor Routes Minor routes connect residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, employment centers, parks, and specific activity cen- ter to the primary and secondary trail system, provide local connections within these areas, or connect these areas with other nearby locations such as schools. These facilities typi- cally cover shorter distances than either of the other types of facilities. Within this category there is the greatest opportu- nity for expansion, based on development patterns in the City. Encouraging More Walking, Hiking and Biking According to a study by the Puget Sound Regional Council, about 5 percent of all trips made in the Central Puget Sound region are bicycle or walking trips, which is comparable to the national average. In Renton, 2.6 percent of commuting trips are made on foot or by bike. In order for Renton to meet the regional average of commuting trips made without cars, as well as to encourage healthier, more active lifestyles and boost recreation, the City must make primary, secondary, and local routes more accessible, make them safer and more at- tractive to use on foot or on bike. Boost from Regional Connections On the regional scale, the completion of missing links, exten- sions, and new trail development would add approximately 30 more miles of trail in and around Renton, for a total of ap- proximately 112 miles of regional trail linkage in the City, which is about 63% of the King County's total System. Connection to the Green River Trail is possible through the completion of a half-mile missing link between Renton and Tukwila. A planned extension of the Soos Creek Trail to the Cedar River Trail and the development of the Cedar- Sammamish Trail from the Cedar River Trail to Sammamish will provide many additional miles of regional trail through Renton. 36 City of Renton DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria were developed to use as the basis for evaluating routes, determining the final selection of routes, the design and cross sections of the routes, and ultimately, as tools for prioritizing the trails for funding and construction. While all the criteria bear significant weight on planning deci- sions, first and foremost, trails and routes need to provide a safe experience for all user groups. The evaluation criteria are based on community needs, safe and efficient bicycle travel. The criteria are listed in proposed order of priority. Safety: The proposed facility should provide a safe trail experience. Accommodation/accessibility: The proposed facility FACTORS AFFECTING should serve the needs of the maximum number of user SAFETY groups possible; both commuters and recreational users, * Potential for conflict with other trail young and old, pedestrians and cyclists. Some advocate users and vehicles, especially at accommodating differing travel modes, user abilities, and crossings trip purposes through separate facilities--separating faster * Traffic volume, speed, and type: cyclists or equestrians from a primary trail meant to ac- smaller, passenger vehicles vs. commodate pedestrians and less-skilled or slower cy- larger vehicles(e.g.trucks and clists. busses) Continuity& Directness: The proposed facility should * Cross section or geometry of facil- be continuous, clear and easy to follow, proceeding in the ity: proximity to vehicular travel most efficient, and direct pathway possible. Cyclists tend lanes,separation from vehicle to favor routes that require the least expenditure of their lanes,width of facility, grade, sight energy. In addition, navigability and ease of wayfinding distances, surfacing,etc. are extremely important to bicycles and pedestrians. * Perceived safety: overall sense of comfort with the facility Connectivity/Linkage: The proposed facility should link destinations of all levels: neighborhoods, employment centers, schools, parks, shopping, recreation and enter- tainment facilities, public services, and destinations be- yond the city limits. In addition the facility should synchro- nize with transportation nodes and modes through the City, to facilitate multi-modal connections. FACTORS AFFECTING TRAIL Regional Trail Connectivity: The proposed facility EXPERIENCE should take advantage of the nexus of several regional * Safety and comfort trails in the area, connecting to and between these sys- * Perceived safety tems to create an even larger network. * Trail volumes and types of users Trail experience: The proposed facility should provide a * Noise, air pollution,traffic speeds comfortable and appealing trail experience, and should and volume take advantage of opportunities to follow scenic corridors and connect with scenic resources. In order of most de- * Scenery and scenic resources sirable to least desirable, the following cross-sections are Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 37 DRAFT recommended: separated trail bicycle lanes, paved shoulders, signed shared roadway, and shared sidewalk. Sensitivity: The proposed facility should be designed to respect and avoid harm to wildlife corridors, critical areas, and other sensitive landscapes. Concurrency: The proposed facility should be concur- rent with other City, County and regional non-motorized planning efforts. Funding/Construction Opportunities: Identify opportu- nities to construct the proposed facility as part of other projects, such as the Transportation Improvement Pro- gram (TIP). METHODOLOGY The evaluation criteria above are listed in order of priority. The sample matrix in Figure 6 illustrates the evaluation meth- odology. The routes are evaluated by each criterion, using a simple to use scoring system. This methodology is designed to allow some flexibility and judgment. The final evaluation matrix (Table 1), which identifies projects and their ranking, is located at the end of Recommendations Section (Part 3). EVALUATION SYSTEM Negative or Somewhat Strongly E: insufficient positive positivew Y w information _ _ Z w } O - F- CH E w Z a J > ~7 w d } W O zrt Pc- Li SEW z Oz _1 z N U p PROPOSED LL U zv z t z z RANK PROJECT FROM/TO IMPROVEMENTS u u- COMMENTS 1 Any Trail Right bank to Multi-use trail • O • • • • O • O left bank 2 Any street Intersection A to Bike lanes, 00 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 Intersection B both sides Figure 6. Sample Evaluation Matrix 38 City of Renton DRAFT CROSS SECTIONS The safety of the users of Renton's trails and bicycle network can be enhanced by building facilities to a consistent stan- dard and maintaining all facilities adequately. The Master r- -- —"— ------, Plan includes a set of guidelines for cross sections as a corn- panion to the recommended routes. The design guidelines provide a reference to the minimum acceptable construction FACTORS FOR DETERMING criteria which will satisfy commonly accepted guidelines for CROSS SECTIONS Safety. * Safety of trail/facility users The cross-section guidelines are based on recognized state * Availability of right-of-way,on road and national standards, described in the Design Standards vs. off road section (page 47). Recognized state and national standards * Location of destination, most direct include dimensional recommendations for widths, cross- route slopes, grades, surface treatments, separation of elements, signage and other elements the make up a new facility or * Type of trail experienced desired system. They are intended to define minimum dimensional * Accommodation of different kinds criteria for development of safe facilities functioning under of trail/facility users normal conditions. * Character of roadway(traffic Figure 7, adapted from Washington State Department of speeds and volumes, etc.) Transportation guidelines, recommends cross sections based * Constraints of existing conditions on roadway classification, traffic speed and volume. In addition to safety and roadway factors, the assignment of — cross sections is based on other factors, such as the con- straints of existing conditions and the desired trail experience (see sidebar). GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR SELECTING CROSS-SECTIONS ON ROADWAYS Adapted from WSDOT ROADWAY TRAFFIC VOLUME RECOMMENDED CLASSIFICATION AND SPEED ON-ROAD (ADT=:average daily CROSS-SECTION traffic) Highways and other Speeds>25 mph 1st choice: high-volume streets ADT>2000 Shared use trail with limited access 2nd choice: 4'min. shoulders, each side Arterials in residential, 1st choice: commercial, industrial Shared use trail areas with higher ac- 2nd choice: cess needs Bike lanes, each side Local streets, rural Speeds< 25 mph Shared roadway highways, Collector or ADT less than 2000 minor arterials Figure 7. Guidelines for Selecting Cross-Sections Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 39 DRAFT TYPES OF ' CROSS SECTIONS OFF-ROAD FACILITIES ON-ROAD FACILITIES- Multi-use Trail Bicycle lanes Separated Multi-use/ Paved shoulder Shared Use Trail Signed shared roadway Figure 8. Types of Cross Sections Figure 8, indicates that cross sections are categorized off- road or on-road. The individual cross sections are described below. Off-road Facilities Off-road facilities can offer a multitude of benefits: reduced potential for conflicts with motor vehicles, more spacious fa- cilities, scenic settings, direct access to open space and rec- reational facilities. There are two types of off-road facilities considered in this master plan: trails associated with road rights-of-way, and trails on other kinds of public or private lands. On-Street Facilities The beauty of the Renton's street network is that it takes peo- ple where they want to go. And yet for bicyclists and pedes- trians, skill-level, physical ability, level of comfort, and avail- able time determine what route is best. The most direct route may not be the best for every user. While some bicyclists feel comfortable riding on streets without dedicated bicycle facilities, many cyclists do not. According to Bike Plan Source: "Experienced bicyclists often prefer arterials for their traffic controls and directness. Other riders tend to avoid them, if possible, because of the traffic. . .Arterials . . . may be the only streets that break certain barriers like railroad yards, freeways, and rivers. But arterials increasingly provide other benefits to cyclists as well. In suburban areas,for example, many popular destinations--schools,worksites, shops--can only be found along arterials. For destination-oriented bicy- clists,therefore, using arterials may be the only alternative." 40 City of Renton DRAFT A combination of the facilities described below will be em- ployed on busier roadways like arterials, as well as local and collector streets to create a trail and bicycle network in Ren- ton that will accommodate a wide range of users' comfort and skill levels. MULTI-USE TRAIL This cross-section applies to corridors that are not associated with road rights-of-way. The design of the trail is wide enough to accommodate two-way shared usage by bicyclists and pe- destrians. Surfacing options include asphalt concrete, Port- land cement, gravel or soft-surface. The latter is preferred if equestrian usage of the trail is expected. Examples of off- road trails would be stream, utility, or railroad corridors. MULTI-USE TRAIL at a glance i 1 ass ,F �f� • Not necessarilyassociated with road right-of-way: could b a 'L' .17t,�� stream, utility, railroad corridor, park or open space fikqp o°�l! ` , ` ,' 0)1 • 2-way travel i;'' 11 f•, �.`." r i t F ti ' - • Width:3' minimum,6-8'preferred, shoulder on each side ,k where trail abuts steep slope t �l • Surfacing varies '"A - AVAILABLE PROPERTY / V IDTN VARIES 3'0" MIN. TO f -0 MULTI-USE TRAIL soft surface Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 41 DRAFT SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAIL (ALSO CALLED ' SHARED USE) In areas where the road right-of-way is wide enough, a two- way separated trail for shared usage is possible. As with the off-road trail cross-section, surfacing options include asphalt concrete, Portland cement, gravel, or soft-surface. Sepa- rated trails provide greater separation from noise, traffic fumes, and are typically preferred by less-skilled cyclists who do not feel comfortable maneuvering along traffic or who want to travel at lower speeds. According to The Pedestri- ans and Bicycling Information Center, Shared use paths are an addition, and complimen- tary,to the roadway network:they are not a substi- tute for providing access to streets and highways. In the past, some communities have treated the - development of a shared use path as the only thing they needed to do to"provide for bicyclists"and give them somewhere to ride. However, even the most extensive trail network cannot provide access to all the origins and destinations in a community, and trail users have to be able to get to and from the trail on the regular street network. 'fir -'',ftlit �': �)'� `_''' ' ^ SEPARATED MULTI-USE/SHARED USE TRAIL :+ 4yr�ir jy CCC"' , is,. ! �ulr•2 '�y''�'N•.^T 1 t• ,-r z`4 f��. t ' '" # ,:, at a glance a yP `,T. "4 t .• Facilityin=the right-of-way yet physically separated from traffic � .� ti9 YP Y Y P �ti} =M ....,_• 7. 1 by open space or a barrier ,, . ^ t • 2-way travels . ,, It �> t r .•. Width: 10' minimum, 12' preferred+2'shoulder on.each side 4, w4t w= 14'or 1.6'total ., ",y' .1.........1.43.1• • e • • 5' minimum separated from roadway , . • Surfacing varies. • Not always preferred by more skilled cyclists,commuters c r : 1 _- -- --- --- 42 City of Renton DRAFT RIGHT-OF-NAY WIDTH VARIES E114 ( MULTI-USE TRAVEL TRAVEL SIDEWALK TRAIL LANE LANE 3'-0" 1010" MIN. MIN. CLEAR ZONE, / 12'-0" /5'0" • / ,r MIN. WIDTH TO PREFERRED OBSTRUCTIONS SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAIL 5' minimum separation between trail and roadway RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES o t:� MULTI-USE TRAIL 2'-0" 1010" MIN. 2'-0" SHOULDER 12'-0" A SHOULDER PREFERRED SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAIL rural conditions, with shoulder Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 43 DRAFT BICYCLE LANES The bicycle lane cross section accommodates cyclist in a designated striped lane and pedestrians either in the shoul- der or on a sidewalk in the case of a curbed roadway. For reasons of safety, bicycle lanes are always one-way facilities traveling in the direction of traffic designated for the exclusive use by bicyclists. ' <,, a BICYCLE LANES at a glance �� _�.,_,____ ,y i__ i., ;,' • 1—way facilities traveling in the direction of traffic, usually on �� " both sides of roadway ` •F> s.,, • Exclusive use by bicyclists r, `l , . • Width: 5 minimum to curb face.or guardrail,4' minimum with- -„_-y ='r , out curb and'gutter • Irv,: ! ' .- '— — • 11 feet::shared bike-lane and parking area,without curb face .` ~ �. _r ._" • 12 feet:shared bike lane:and parking area with a curb face '` ,,. � •� , • Paved surface denoted with pavement markings: , K, 4"or 6"solid white line:demarcating;bike lane, bicycle _ ,` i lane symbol (see Signage plans) �q}' ` � --/ 4"solid white linedemarcating parking area ' Bike lane symbol (6' high)and directional arrows should i be painted on the far side of each intersection .. , 4 , r , 44 City of Renton DRAFT RIGHT-OF-WAY / WIDTH VARIES SIDEWALK PARKING BIKE TRAVEL TRAVEL BIKE PARKING SIDEWALK LANE LANE LANE LANE MIN. MIN. q'-0" 5'-0' VARIES VARIES 5'-0" q'-0" / / / / / / / BIKE LANES: TWO-WAY ROAD, with PARKING 2 travel lanes, 2 parking lanes, 2 bikes lanes / RIGHT-OF-WAY / WIDTH VARIES Ammah SIDEWALK BIKE TRAVEL TRAVEL BIKE SIDEWALK LANE LANE LANE LANE # MIN. MIN. A'-0'v/ 11'-0" / 11'-0" /5'-0/ / BIKE LANES: TWO-WAY ROAD, no PARKING 2 travel lanes, 2 bikes lanes Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 45 DRAFT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES / 601-0" / MIN. P iii „,L - SIDEWALK BIKE TRAVEL TWO-WAY TRAVEL BIKE SIDEWALK LANE LANE LEFT TURN LANE LANE ,. / 5 -0' / 11'-0" / 12'-0" / 11'-0" 5'-0' / / , BIKE LANES: ROAD, with TURN LANE 2 travel lanes, 1 two-way left turn lane, 2 bikes lanes Existing examples: Talbot Road South, south of South 43rd Street; SW 16th Street, west of Oakesdale _ 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES / 801-0" MIN. n f SIDE- BIKE TRAVEL TRAVEL TWO-WAY TRAVEL TRAVEL BIKE SIDE- WALK LANE LANE LANE LEFT TURN LANE LANE LANE WALK 5'-0" 11'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 11'-0" 5'-0" / / / / / / / / BIKE LANES: 4-LANE ROAD, with TURN LANE 4.travel lanes, 1 two-way left turn lane, 2 bikes lanes ' Existing example: Duvall Avenue NE, north of NE 4th Street 46 City of Renton DRAFT SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY • ` When right-of-way widths and existingroadwayconditions 9 Y prohibit the addition of dedicated bicycle facilities, a roadway ,',; can be designated for shared use by motorists and bicyclists. Typically, this design solution is used on roadways with low traffic speeds and low levels of traffic or with wide curb lanes • f :0 j (i.e. 14 feet minimum). Signed shared roadways may provide - a safer alternative to travel on busier parallel routes; direct 4 cyclists toward particular destinations, such as parks, 1-` • schools, shopping areas; or may serve as a link between dis- A ' R"rte ~�: continuous segments of dedicated bicycle facilities. Because .,, • G # signed shared roadways are often local streets, they may not - ,-' necessarily be the most direct route. Ideally, signed shared roadways give bicyclists more priority in traffic maneuvers. The WSDOT Design Manual recommends the following crite- - -- ' F' ria be used in determining whether to sign a bike route/ • ,t,. 4' shared roadway: - _ _"--�i4 • The route offers a higher degree of service than alter- _ ._ _ '� native streets .- • The route provides for through and direct travel in bi- cycle corridors • The route connects bicycle facilities • Traffic control devices have been adjusted to accom- modate bicyclists • Street parking is prohibited for improved safety where lane width is critical • Surface hazards to bicyclists have been corrected • Maintenance of the route is at a higher level than comparable streets, such as more frequent street sweeping and repair. SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY at a glance • Bicyclists share roadway with motorists for safety,wayfinding, v7' or other purposes vat' • No change to roadway configuration required,though routes tti are often designated with signage and other measures to give bicyclists priority or enhance their safety and comfort' • Usually on lower volume,speed roadways/local streets. ,F • Signage: every mile, or at every turn �k J Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 47 DRAFT -_r / RIGHT-OF-WAY / WIDTH VARIES SIDEWAL< PARKING SNARED SNARED PARKING SIDEWALK LANE BIKE/VEHICLE BIKE/VEHICLE LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE MIN. / q'-0" / VARIES / VARIES / q'-0" TWO-WAY SHARED USE ROADWAY, with PARKING 2 shared bike/vehicle travel lanes, 2 parking lanes RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES 60'-0" / / MIN. ,„, M SIDEWALK SHARED TWO-WAY SNARED SIDEWALK BIKE/VEHICLE LEFT TURN BIKE/VEHICLE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 15'-0" 12'-0" 15'-0" / / / / TWO-WAY SHARED USE ROADWAY, with TURN LANE 2 shared bike/vehicle travel lanes, 1 two-way left turn lane Existing example: SW 16th Street,east of Oakesdale 48 City of Renton DRAFT PAVED SHOULDERS Paved shoulders are for shared used by bicyclists and pedes- trians. In traffic situations shoulders are often used by stopped vehicles and for emergency uses. Even so, a paved shoulder goes a long way to enhancing the corridor for use by bicyclists and pedestrians. In addition to minimum width, paved shoulders should be free from obstructions and have a reliably smooth surface free, without rumble strips. PAVED SHOULDERSata glance V }r • For use by bicyclists and pedestrians+stopped vehicles, r �_f' ``.c• ` • .v�J }V emergencies '8_•L 1k` • Width: 5' minimum with curb and gutter,4' minimum without ��41"; � curb:and gutter _ • Widths should be increased with.higher bicycle use, motor ve- hicle speeds above 50 mph, higher percentage of truck and - - - bus traffic. SHARED SIDEWALK _ • _ A shared sidewalk cross-section allows cyclists to share the sidewalk with a pedestrian. This cross-section is considered .--1� .-i; a last resort solution in isolated situations such as across bridges and along high speed and high-traffic roadways, s`- r ('. 'k. 4. which lack adequate right-of-way for the provision of bicycle ;,, lanes, but have existing sidewalks. On sidewalks, bicyclists are expected to yield to pedestrians and walk their bicycles if sidewalks are particularly narrow. • Both the shared roadways and shared sidewalk cross- sections are included among the alternatives as a mean to fill in gaps at difficult locations. Neither is considered an opti- mum solution and both are avoided where possible. SHARED SIDEWALK at a glance • Generally not advised, except for special circumstances: bridges, high speed/high-traffic roadways - • Bicyclists must yield to pedestrians -i1�{• COMBINED CROSS-SECTIONS Certain conditions, such as right-of-way limitations, traffic vol- umes, environmental conditions, etc. may preclude the con- sistent use of a single cross-sections along a route, street. While consistency is generally the preference, it is preferable to have a facility that uses a combination of cross-sections rather than no facility at all, or one that ends abruptly. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 49 DRAFT , t - IMPLEMENTATION OF CROSS SECTIONS It is recommended that, at the project design level, each pro- ' .,;r~ ect be reassessed to determine theappropriateness �,.��•�� ' : '� ;arc: 1 of the - suggested improvements, and to determine the available a right-of-way, etc. Moreover, it is also critical for the Master Plan to have some flexibility in the designation of cross section. In the evolution raq; 4 + of the planning process, certain assumptions were made - , about existing conditions, road locations in the right-of-way, condition and location of utilities, etc. When the project is finally in the development phase, a topographic and right-of- _,:____ way survey will provide the first clear picture of the actual - conditions of the route, and it may be necessary to implement \ a different design solution or combination of design solutions A than are shown in the Master Plan. In addition, there may be development of other capital projects or changes in funding strategies that dictate a different cross section or facility clas- sification than the one currently identified. DESIGN STANDARDS AASHTO GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BI- CYCLE FACILITIES This manual of design standards is recognized nationally as the "industry standard for development of bicycle facilities." All of the design guidelines included in the recommendations section of this plan will meet the minimum standards articu- lated in the AASHTO document. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines This manual identifies specific design standards related to bicycle and pedestrian facility installations. These standards are referenced in the design guidelines. KC Regional Trails Inventory& Guidelines According to the King County Trails website, "the King County Regional Trail System is one of the nation's most ex- tensive multi-use off-road systems with over 175 miles of trails for bicycling, hiking, walking, and horseback riding." King County Regional trail guidelines are closely aligned with the AASHTO guidelines but are intended to create and unify the regional network by standardizing regional trail design elements, based on the concerns of safety, convenience, aesthetic experience, and economical maintenance. The quality and connectivity of local non-motorized networks varies, but the King County system is the backbone of recrea- 50 City of Renton DRAFT tional and commuting use across the region. Some King County regional trails see as many as 2,000 users a day. As such, the regional trail standards are designed to accommo- dating a large number and variety of users in a safe, efficient and enjoyable manner. FUNDING The City of Renton includes a Bicycle Route Development Program in the annual Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is adopted annually by the City Council. The 2009-2014 TIP (Appendix H) has programmed $448,000 to implement projects identified in the Trail and Bi- cycle Master Plan. The funding can be used for planning, design and construction phases of the projects as well as for local matches for state and federal grants, as identified in Ap- pendix I. Although it may not be the primary purpose of a particular project or program, many TIP projects have the po- p tential to assist in implementing projects within the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS & PROJECT PRIORI- TIZATION The recommended trails and bikeways improvements are shown in Figure 9 (city-wide) and Figure 10 (downtown area detail). Table 1, following the recommended improvements maps, is the draft prioritization matrix for the recommended improve- ments evaluated on the criteria described earlier in this chap- ter, and described in the sample evaluation matrix (figure 6). These projects are organized from highest to lowest priority on the basis of their ranking among the criteria. The table identifies each project by location and cross-section. Follow- ing the prioritized matrix is a listing of recommended improve- ments broken down by Parks and Transportation divisions. The complete inventory of proposed recommendation and existing facilities can be found in Appendix A, organized al- phabetically. The inventory identifies each route by location, length, proposed cross section, etc. IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIORITED PROJECTS Conditions and priorities in all communities change over time. Therefore the entire project list should be periodically re- evaluated. This review should be completed by a group in- cluding residents, committee members, City staff, and others to assure it reflects the needs and desires of the community Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 51 DRAFT at large. Reevaluation may involve changes as significant as redefining routes or as minor as shifting project priorities. Maintaining flexibility and responsiveness to the community's concerns and desires will assure long-term success and con- tinued growth of the system. Finally, opportunities for trails and bikeways development may arise (through property acquisition, grant approval, con- currence with other projects, public support, etc.)that could shift project priorities. This list should be reviewed and up- dated periodically as project implementation progresses. PROJECT SHEETS A selection of proposed improvements have been detailed as project sheets, which can be found at the end of the report. 52 City of Renton lirill `r iumli o..r r..r 1..Ilr 1�� Palk Il (La �� �'� yf,esrP�e a MERCER �� , Ea\� �NEv oae,Ie ar an °er SPas Cougar Ridge � Lest Open I Space Tract E'.^1e 1 Chew Falls l ark A Park souta 'f/: / � {�'�lrj. L� I1 ISLAND n ') Alt i, Playact," % cake Trawl r -1 11v Uv e.3 Redman r on R>Rawai Roan U P... Oh .va Sf- SLL`1 Beach Park FeW 1 q;y P.n Perk \ Island ��J �L _ Beachilk W4d rz' ' ��' -' �� Creek Open 'Palau (�� ' 1 • 1 Park Atlantic ,- /a 1 F■k 5 Space1114 City Nursery Y Q o " (:hew Ply ran Gleneagles ""n tangy j , £�: } I PB $ Creek Pa�X Pam Park a:gn s 1 '4 ASTLE 41111111 �_ ISMv■ ¢1 -! i,.., .... 8 1e' frHtt � R.,„,,e cougar Mountain ' Morgan Regional WWIanO Pak ! �♦ nq , I •• I • Pa Xe..••••' Park nr_ 1 IKndy ,� ,,,,,„ RgMands t g El Park M Pan he lusts Fae{t —,� ilt.4.tit �Ll t�4. k AJ. b t de'mod Ey •• • d5 a3 - Q • -IL.I�� ['lemon r NF- - G �m - a • i. n� S. HOE MI le/ l,'ai`e K h o r Greek ?ry'.,y� ' e �Cl� LV. = ii • Glee Tvay I �' Pell on y Kuala,F �C.` `'I J nubile] �l JL� S vL�l t t��5t �C _ _ 1I^J r, I, G a.A 7- e :QJ . - _5. . Pan.� sd s1 �a���� �� See Proposed _ _ !�j� < •!s SE TLE �� ���, Improvements caao, �\ Downtown Pan ■unulli ■'Av1j Ili♦R \ �JL-�uC ♦• ) r �SMLRvk`� 1 -il �1 kts 4,� �kp` plat,,i� �. ♦ ♦ 1L_? F �, Property :•'• •r lal �I 111 tat lu ta.Q�t`ul I■1 II In ul I■�_ tut`•`'` • May1&Valley s �I�: t� ♦''.'♦♦` �JJ�I�J' C� t� 4nI:- ' P� . = 1 ratAna . ��'- - �J—� Rent '�`� FI " \k %t i •.I4h _ _ . NE,Oth St _,_ .�� ,, 1 I . W-1"Ill N ( � \� �� . co yy F. wa N 4 B yv River \ - +tllrt Il and iI a ry . paell \ P X Sit [" r 'Mt _ —.l�l - t ,-_ll. \•AT x Rlu - 1 rE,iv it i -z �:; - _ r ,=tzA ( �i/�� I i11 i Oki L Coalbeld ParkP l I�Lf��.r�L.� _�� " ,,�, 1 M 1 Pa.. .. LJL • �r 1' a �L Center !crf l .d NP\ ---NE�4 h,lu lit In In In In In IId111.NF �—, �� —� r- 1^ rA 1 1�-�' dPI-I,sl o o � • ..< �- 6 L I• � Roder i I •� .�' . � - elem�N>e '- Ctt:w _ _ I� - n'„y 1'_ i •,,k S133rd hS�, .h 2ndS l'�♦�R +�' rr,l I I , ���� ,. Pan IJParx trl �. ;.�.S:�3iniS� �� - r P��� -._,J ��� Gar il' `� �. 4tlLs, s �� en"n .Rt ylydektnan _ t}Irt` ter k,. bens ce.ne<en !I Renew _ ? N I a I.- Bth sl 1 w ---- me .5,- �`1 / r$ _L• 1 ,pjt l� Aar P,��\ Ji._..7.-\...„__ `�� +_l_> M 17 , m �� L, `-T-� ,.. J�■� y mod^e �u ��ILLLJ uhon 11� 91 � m ���nn� \4 ...BM:::: usch Rve'♦ '•-' Q S veu " A ^ o 10111 • A" ♦ '- ied -.��T /( Pea s � _ � + ''`� 1• forest � Raatl roe ! �l � � �I »� �� r �. _ Rnk ,yrPark SE "'Sr -1H i rw.� 1 I1 1' A` _Tr,• �'sod Y =1 I eu,en \ M.Plewoo0 pp 2 O n 1 T' IA '• . •. k _ Ltne.��erk - Park E M:111:e..,..74.:;11.4461:: lgh I if' Pa a {. . \'try' ' ' Cella.Roder J ^ �J 1 N '* Fon - I v, '� J, ❑ ILArnakt Natural MaPMacad ♦1yI ut■, - C,, (,..Jr 'J_i.1 V-'' _ � v.C% A�ii W ,IrJ�,[�•G G�"advH '_ r • Gonca,rso N '+ 7VL._nJ L_1u� rry �\ .. S.x. `O`e �� �:- 161h St ,'` LaXe 1��!! f �' N� • 1 ' Reg' o `a ,r. Cedar I`.. - f= tyr // ' SPr:ngbr -T \I Pe f .� .*\ �'♦ yr, Rver Park s■L�I.. 1�.t�� I1.1' i):S i Ii rlyr IX W �- .1 �� II y1 \ M:IIH . .�®� s- r,,,,,S9 r _. Sound ... • Park and / ® ■i Ir V \T. St w a y�J� I�N,i4,*r • Ir111-.t� ,7 a rel _ ,•... 1• __ a l ' o. t nmal 'I - I 1p:t, Iii,,_.....7,4...,• _ ----\------ -.TraA McGanay mar !wamnda l �� R�7,7�3�f�flP(���L%�� it ' Park Open ! a c , fPond Wellnds • _ �. r�.. • n.m _ r • a, .. 9W'•thS : Iillel �' �� %I� 1 E 1 Z1LI.JOE_ - I • �s • onll Pan _ . � --- - 1 I '� �- - .-: J n� TUKWILA 1 v i )�V, ) �` r `•' ii /, atural SW 4161�.1 w • • ;. ya1111 I.111111111Io lit IY III III Iui11 L11110 1■\y1111/IIr �l\t/N1111Io 11l rQ / ��?,••.• , .e... YO' \ �_: n J �fO Sl tll [II Q ka _ ■1 1111 - A Deane 1 akN ' d jrit •. Far w p'p r J`,, pr.AVjae m�d w l l u l X `, -', .I :ctr SM i Area ll4�.� i'NXNI`. �yfl y11 r1y 1u mu t11 Mt Mt sat' S:"' • _ '1rr�J1 •ter l III II,♦1111pPI1, _ it _ . E. 1 ' . Petro Ssky ___ : •rrlrr4 P�k 41«.: S 1AOth S ,/,e'Y • �� •C ' 21rIII111111111111111111 I/H••`Brlb(roe Mean.., l I p 1 .-✓� �� 1 lr.Inaa!rPan / J - o 1 )j-n' -/r � 4e,,� S ; � = Legend �. art"e a 3 •• �� = Freeway Gr r • r i ' -`. ••••e• sr 79 1n,�1AIlII 111 mist 1111111.111 UI111111111111 I�mato lyyr11111111III 111111 �E_N4.1isr t Arterial Street 92nd St _ �I I Local Street - •Et i `ike EXISTING ROUTES 3,98th St > -' 4 Yonngs 5Y n 1. Multi use trail,Regional "' atban m Watershed = -� Multi use trail,Local Trail I . _ ''♦ E Y Lake .III III tit um m 11`ul let 111 1111i Eu_ ♦�� �' Youngs az 1. Bicycle Lane I --II 9_ _ ♦♦ pli watershed ^�-- Signed shared roadway I _5. - No Puns E T D= _ �'•'°'' ♦♦oA" `�' Access Pedestian-only trail s I 'Doe eft eek ,Sous naP Lu y PROPOSED ROUTES 1 ---- 1 - i i Space et ""'"" "' yl■11■I l• 'T 4♦♦ok Multi-use trail,Regional E. - Multi-use trail,Local IN 111111111lei Ill lit lel11111I 11r u1111s1111 to to rum milt '4 S?' ' - - �111/1111� Bicycle Lane AMenon • II 1\l�- 7- G _ l y i •'+;,' Signed shared roadway Pan -.... _ _----....... I a-.F 1 St L' - Lake YoungsLake Youngs �a N _-- •a1 ro - - ........ Pedestrian-only trail I. - Connector - hail . yQir alFuture rolls trolls corridor JI -e. I kv 5 e a N - r 1'rl to Interstate Fwy 11/i State Hwy l s 24th a ., s ,mge r ; l -„_r..:. ' ; l __ City Limits .o = " and PAAS g w K w_,mle a -. Park I I S i.Okibrnear _ 226th SI S 228 St - - - _ Ak��Park School �.,_.. ,,,._ i ) 1 . aria l.zl MAP SCALE 1:36,000 - II IF II E 1��)�7r_1 Amenity Opportunity Location SOURCE:City of Renton King County GIS Center May 2007 `�1' MACLE ,s . �� Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan OD• RE ,� ' CKORD '1' i\T.t` Proposed Trails and Bikeways Improvements DRAFT 8-1-200 — \i, !Mil St --- -III MI I■FI11!U9II IN 1-I III III!/I I11 I I • 3' i Z U z m I A : <I.____c r-- - - Hil -.1 , I a _ • ■ Renton 1 1' 1 N d h / / �I Stadium Memorial 1t t■1!/►7�,, Yl.)+O'1Y W III lilt 111 I■I Irf'a Ill �.' �m�/ O 3- _ ILLE ., ton l •�� 2 / 11 ■m Education. �� Cci Ced p Center i 4 y �• ' River frill %.„ 1< rr I — 4 �4/�t t', itAl � Renior '1 tl 0/C 4,4 11 Center ONE WAY I . il L---1 s f-- - 5,. ti-,-sf ■N 2nd St $ _ / il. 4,,i•J,, s: ■ / / ' I S. Tobin St f , •• , - j1,11 Ill 1/1 III tr1E111 I11 I111■1 I■1 III I Ir - G 4 -Jones ♦ ._ *Iii '1 II Qi 1 ' Park Renton / - I^ Renton Renton _ RerltOn m IKEA / / ear Y_ �- tc�t 1 -J' Cu t ,' i1 ' ,t - . 1NG _—School Pert Arts • 1 _ t _� Safeway ON: AY Gateway) _ t-- -- , 3tat or Cry Han River Park \� P Cr dy Renton I Historical 4 , S 3rd St , ;Rrye � w r r Cedar Rye, ! 11:11 II ((( Fred • ;is' t IMI 1-I lit ry 0 /c" �' Meyer oo` 3rd Pi ,Zdioo > : t Renton S' Q ' Z . Ctr ! �' i. 1�� PA i j o m I'tt cn Q Itire"w S. 5th St �' to tit i \ ► �� S.6th St _ `b 1y 4. —�' is o .1 s i, . near I r P Rk Ienton i I;. SW 7th St t��( City - l���■i ■ 1411i1 ■■■ - Han I =�� _ . jj, i O RCP Ctty Co,-. 2007 Legend EXISTING ROUTES PROPOSED ROUTES ^.■t. Paved trail,regional Mem& Multi-use trail,regional — — . Paved trail,local Multi use trail,local .-`., Bicycle Lane 4glimn. Bicycle Lane ♦....,., Signed shared roadway -11. , . Signed shared roadway — ------ Pedestrian only trail `"•••l► Pedestrian only trail Future rails-trails corridor rw O Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan O MACLE r 0D• RE Recommended Improvements: Downtown CKORD DRAFT 9-11-2008 +r RENTON TRAILS&BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TABLE 1.DRAFT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX FOR RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 9/11/2008 Negative or Insufficent ' Some what Positive Strongly Positive Evaluation Key Info. 0 1 0 2 • 3 Z W o J Li a ,_ Q F w W NOTES, tn TRAIL/ROUTE PROP.CROSS °p m > 1_ > w F Z z Possible NAME FROM TO W I- a ¢ SECTION E 7 p Z U w a LJ x > cc t7 p_ Funding Proposed routes only f W Z 1- w t7 Z w u, E p z r w 0 tJ I- W Z a O Z lJ p p Sources li- u < O � OZ W O CC W 0 Oa VI Q - l.J O Li CCU I- N Li U. O HIGHEST PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS 1 TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Green River Cedar River SEPARATED MULTI- KC,TIP 1,2,12, Fort Dent Connector, Trail Trail USE trail,PAVED 14 Black River Riparian Forest,Naches Ave • • • • • • 0 0 • SWW,,SSW 7th Street, Shattuck Ave 5, Houser Way S. 2 SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Black River SW 43rd COMPLETE MISSING • • 00000 0 • • O O O Trail/Monster Street LINKS Road 3 MAY CREEK TRAIL Cougar SEPARATED • 0 0 00000 0 USE MULTI- Washington Mountain USE TRAIL,SOFT Blvd North County Park SURFACE PANTHER CREEK Watershed Lake Street multi-use trail,SS 1405 4 TRAIL • 0 000000 O Congestion Relief 5 DUVALL AVENUE NE NE 4th Street/ Coal Creek EXTEND BIKE LANES TIP 3,4 BIKE LANES SE 128th Street Parkway/ 000000000 Northern City Limits 6 LIBERTY PARK Cedar River Trai Bronson Way SEPARATED MULTI- TIP 12,14 CONNECTOR North/ USE trail,PAVED Factory • • 0000000 Avenue North 7 SAM CHASTAIN Cedar River Gene Coulon MULTI-USE TRAIL+ • • • • • • 0 • • TIP 11 MEMORIAL TRAIL Trail Park BOARDWALK 8 NE 3rd/4th STREET Logan Avenue Eastern City SEGMENTS OF TIP 9,18,19,WS BIKE LANES North Limits SEPARATED MULTI- PBP USE TRAIL, 000 • • 0000 EXTENDED BIKE LANES 9 TUKWILA STATION/ Monster Road Tukwila SEPARATED MULTI- TIP 12,14 LONGACRES WAY SW Station USE TRAIL CONNECTOR(South • • • • • O • 0 0 Grady Way and Longacres Way SW) 10 LAKE WASHINGTON West entrance Park Avenue NO CHANGE(w. TIP 11 LOOP:AIRPORT to Airport North BIKE LANES ON PERIMETER ROAD& LOGAN) 00 0 000000 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 11 SE BIKEILANE Tukwila/Green Petrovitsky BIKE LANES O O • • • 0 • O O TIP 1,2;WS PBP ROAD LANES River Trail and Park Interurban Trail 12 GARDEN AVENUE Cedar River/ Bronson Way BIKE LANES TIP 1,2,18.19; NORTH&NORTH 6th Cedar River North 000000 • • • • 0 • • • STP MPO Alloc. STREET BIKE LANES Trail 13 CASCADE TRAIL/SW Oakesdale Puget Drive EXTEND TRAIL;ADD Tukwila/Rento C T SW Avenue SW& SE SIDEWALKS ES AND 0 • • 000000 n Project CONNECTOR SW 27th Street BIKE LANES ON BRIDGE 14 NE 10th STREET NE Sunset Blvd NE 164th St SHARED USE 1-405 BIKEWAY ROADWAY 0 • • • • 0 • 0 • Cgeon Relief;on STPsti MPO 15 OAKESDALE AVENUE SW 7th Street SW 43rd EXTEND BIKE LANES O 0 • 000000 TIP 1,2 SW BIKE LANES Street 16 BUSOUTH AVENUEA South 7th CedarrailRiver SHAREDO USE • 0 • • 0 • • 0 0 STP SOUTH LINEAR AND Street Trail ROADWAY Enhancements PEDESTRIAN PARK Negative or Insuffi cent , Info. Some what Positive Strongly Positive Evaluation Key O1 O 2 • 3 z w 0 -J v a to pc a w v II NOTES, TRAIL/ROUTE PROP.CROSS o m Ln > 1- >_ W w z Possible NAME FROM TO 'n F a tY SECTION 217 DE v u+ a tJ x > oc t, 12 Funding Proposed routes only L J O v ,E tJ Z a O Z E v O 0,- Sources Z U. V V Z , Z . ,- Z a Z Z Z a Jan as u O u0 v = cc I— to v u. O 17 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SW 7th Street Renton City EXTEND BIKE LANES O O • • • • • O 0 TIP 1,2 BIKE LANES Limits (southwest) 18 EDMONDS AVENUE NE 4th Street NE 27th SHARED USE 00_• •_O O • O 0 NE BIKEWAY Street ROADWAY 19 RIVERSIDE DRIVE Williams Bronson Way SHARED USE 00 • • • © • O 0 NORTH Avenue North North ROADWAY 20 BENSON ROAD South 2nd SE Carr BIKE LANES 1-405 SOUTH/MAIN Street Road/SE O O •• 000000 Congestion AVENUE SOUTH 176th Relief BIKEWAY a` MEDIUM PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH 2nd AND 3rd Rainier Avenue Bronson Way SHARED USE 000 . 00000 21 STREET BIKEWAY South ROADWAY 22 SHATTUCK AVENUE Houser Way South 2nd BIKE LANES 00 . 000000 TIP 1,2 SOUTH South Street 23 116th AVENUE SE Puget Drive SE City Limits SEPARATED MULTI- Safe Routes to BIKE LANES (south) USE TRAIL,PAVED • • • °"'; 00000 O . 00 Schools AND BIKE LANES 24 LAKE/TOBIN/ Rainier Avenue Cedar River SHARED USE TIP 11 SHATTUCK STREET Trail ROADWAY • • • • Ca • O BIKE LANES 25 WILLIAMS&WELLS South Grady N.6th St SHARED USE • • • • • • • O O AVENUE BIKEWAY Way ROADWAY 26 LAKE TO CREEK Burnett Honey Creek BIKE LANES TIP 1,2 CONNECTOR: Avenue North NO RTH ICK 00 • 000000 NORTH 30th PLACE NORTH/NE 27th STREET 27 SEATTLE WATERLINE Cedar River/ Lake Youngs SEPARATED MULTI- O O O TRAIL Riverview Park Watershed USE TRAIL,ROUGH • O O O • SURFACE 28 SEATTLE WATERLINE Cedar River/ 161 sV 131st SEPARATED MULTI- • O O 0000 O O SPUR Riverview Park Ave NE USE TRAIL,ROUGH SURFACE HONEY CREEK TRAIL Honey Union SEPARATED MULTI- 29 Creek/May Avenue NE USE TRAIL,SOFT • O O 0000 00 Creek SURFACE confluence 30 NE 12th STREET Edmonds Union SHARED USE 00 . 000000 BIKEWAY Avenue NE Avenue NE ROADWAY 31 NE SUNSET BLVD/ NE 3rd/NE 4th SE May Valley ADD BIKE LANES 00000000 OO • • O • O • TIP 1,2;WS PBP SR 900 BIKE LANES Street Road 32 MAPLEWOOD Duvall Avenue SE 132nd SHARED USE Safe Routes to HEIGHTS SCHOOL NE to SE 132nd Street to ROADWAY Schools ROUTE Street to 144th 144th O O O 00000 . Avenue SE Avenue SE 33 LINDBERGH/RENTON 108th Avenue 128th SHARED USE Safe Routes to PARK SCHOOL ROUTE SE Avenue SE ROADWAY 000000000 O • • • O O • Schools (Renton Park Elementary) 34 MONROE AVENUE NE NE 4th Street NE 12th ADD BIKE LANES 00 • • O O • • • TIP 1,2 BIKE LANES Street 35 SOUTH 3rd PLACE Rainier Ave. Shattuck Ave. BIKE LANES TIP 1,2 BIKE LANES South South • O • • O 36 GREEN RIVER TO LAKE SR 167(Kent/ LakeYoungs BIKE LANES O O O 000000 TIP 1,2 YOUNGS CONNECTOR Green River ultimately) 37 140th AVENUE Maple Valley SE 208th EXTEND BIKE LANES WS PBP SE/132nd AVENUE SE Hwy(SR 169) Street O • 0000 . 00 BIKE LANES 38 PUGET DRIVE SE BIKE Panther Creek 116th BIKE LANES,or TIP 1,2 LANES Avenue SE climbing lane at 00 • 000000 and Beacon min. Way SE Negative or Insufficent Some what Positive Strongly Positive Evaluation Key Info. O1 O 2 • 3 z u.i o -j U TRAIL/ROUTE PROP.CROSS o m i- 0 > > W > z z Possible NAME FROM TO w = _1 r- w 1- ¢ SECTION f . D z a u+ a v it > z 0 P. Funding Proposed routes only > 22 z f- . 0 z w w ~ D z ix LL Ov PO ZaL OZ J ,� v 60 Sources ip z u1 Qa tJO OIJJ CCU I— u1 CC LL Li V LLO LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS 39 PARK AVENUE NORTH North 30th North 40th SHARED USE BIKEWAY Street LakeROADWAY Washington 00 . . . 0 . 0 O Washingttonn Blvd 40 PETROVITSKY FAIR 140th Avenue Petrovitskyk SHAREDO USE O O • • • O • O 0 PEOVITS PARK SE Park ROADWAY BIKEWAY 41 UNION AVENUE NE SE 95th Way Dead end ADD BIKE LANES O O • • O O • O O TIP 1,2 BIKE LANES (about SE 4th Street) 42 AVENUE Lake SW 7th St No change&HARD O 000 00 . O O HARDIE AVENUEE Washington SW BIKEWAY Blvd North 43 CHIEF SEALTH TRAIL Seattle City Renton City SEPARATED MULTI- • • 00040 O • O O • KC limits Limits(west) USE TRAIL THUNDER HILLS 1-405 Puget Drive SEPARATED MULTI- • O O 00000 O 44 CREEK TRAIL SE USE TRAIL,ROUGH SURFACE ARNOLD PARK Beacon Way SHARED USE BIKEWAY(Cedar South and ROADWAY 45 Avenue,South 7th Cedar Avenue 000000 . 00 Street and Beacon Way SouthE/Puget Puget Drive South) Drive SE SE 46 SE WAY 140th Avenue SE 176th SHARED USE 00 . 000 . O O BIKEWAY SE Street ROADWAY 47 CEDAR-SAMMAMISH Cedar River at Issaquah City PAVED REGIONAL • • O 0 . 00 • O O O • KC TRAIL 154th Avenue Limits TRAIL SE 48 SOOS CREEK TRAIL Cedar River Lake Meridian SEPARATED MULTI- • • Q • • • O O • KC Trail USE TRAIL,PAVED SO RE MAYAD B VALLEY LaWaeshington iHobart Issaquah- SHAREDO USE O O O • • • • O O ROAD BIKEWAY Washington Hobart Road ROADWAY Blvd North 1 KEY TO FUNDING SOURCES:(refer to Appendices G,H and I) CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program,MPO Allocation 1-405 Congestion Relief WSDOT KC King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks-Regional Trails STP-Enhancement Surface Transportation Act,Enhancment Program STP-MPO Allocation Surface Transportation Act,MPO Allocation TIP City of Renton Transporation Improvement Program WS PBPB Washington State Pedestrian and Bicycle Program RENTON TRAILS&BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Table 2.DIVISION-SEPARATED ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ' 9/17/2008 Approx ength CURRENTCROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION PARKS DIVISION TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Fort Dent Park Monster Road 0.25 Soft-surface trail, SEPARATED MULTI-Union Pacific Railroad FORT DENT TRAIL SW rough,under railroad USE trail,PAVED ROW between Tukwila/ CONNECTOR trestle Ft.Dent Park/ Interurban Trail and Renton. Path follow Black River to its confluence with Green River TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Black River Naches 0.9 Soft-surface trail, SEPARATED MULTI-Trail parallels railroad BLACK RIVER TRAIL Riparian Forest Avenue SW rough USE trail ROW Trailhead/ Monster Road TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Black River SW 7th St 0.2 Local street SEPARATED MULTI- NACHES AVENUE SW Riparian Forest USE trail Trailhead TWO RIVERS TRAIL:SW Oakesdale Burnett 1.3 Minor arterial with SEPARATED MULTI-Add bikes lanes 7th STREET Avenue sidewalks USE trail,PAVED through"road diet"to create SEPARATED trail? TWO RIVERS TRAIL: SW 7th Street Houser Way 0.17 Collector with some SEPARATED MULTI-Reconfigure on-street SHATTUCK AVENUE South sidewalks, USE trail,PAVED parking to SOUTH perpendicular accommodate bikes parking on west side TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Shattuck Avenue Burnett 0.3 Local street without SHARED USE HOUSER WAY SOUTH South Avenue sidewalks ROADWAY South TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Burnett Avenue Main Avenue 0.3 Local street+RR SEPARATED MULTI-New cross-section to HOUSER WAY SOUTH South South tracks and sidewalks USE trail allow RR use between (RAILROAD ROW) Burnett and Main(long term?) SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Black River SW 43rd 2.85 Separated multi-use COMPLETE 2 segments to be Trail/Monster Street trail,paved MISSING LINKS completed Road MAY CREEK TRAIL Lake Coal Creek 2.5 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Missing link Lake Washington Blvd Parkway trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,SOFT Washington to Lake North (Cougar SURFACE Washington Blvd Mountain County Park) PANTHER CREEK TRAIL Springbrook Lake Street 2 No existing trail multi-use trail,SS 1.7 to City Limits,2.8 to Watershed Park Springbrook Watershed Park. Could be included as part of 1-405 redevelopments. Include connection to Edlund Property. LIBERTY PARK Cedar River Trail Bronson Way 0.2 Public park;informal SEPARATED MULTI-Need a bikeway on east CONNECTOR North/ access through USE trail,PAVED side of park to connect Factory Cedar River Trail and Avenue Garden Ave. North SAM CHASTAIN Cedar River Trail Gene Coulon 0.7 No existing trail MULTI-USE TRAIL+ Not intended for bikes; MEMORIAL TRAIL Park BOARDWALK on hold indefinitely. Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL. TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES SECTION CROSS SECTION in Miles BURNETT AVENUE South 7th Street Cedar River 1 Collector/linear park SHARED USE SOUTH LINEAR AND Trail with paved path and ROADWAY PEDESTRIAN PARK sidewalks& separated multi-use path&street SEATTLE WATERLINE Downtown/I-405 Lake Youngs 3.75 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Utilizes utility corridor, TRAIL at Cedar Ave. Watershed trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,ROUGH w.spur to Cascade Park South SURFACE SEATTLE WATERLINE Cedar River/ 161 st/131st 1 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Utilizes utility corridor SPUR Riverview Park Ave NE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,ROUGH SURFACE HONEY CREEK TRAIL Honey Creek/ Union 1.25 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Hiking/walking May Creek Avenue NE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,SOFT confluence SURFACE THUNDER HILLS CREEK 1-405 Puget Drive 0.9 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Could be included w.(- TRAIL SE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,ROUGH 405 redevelopment SURFACE BLACK RIVER TRAIL Black River Springbrook Separated pedestrian NO CHANGE trail alongside Riparian Forest Trail trail,soft-surface water/heron rookery Trailhead/ Monster Road CEDAR RIVER TRAIL Lake City Limits 4.5 Paved regional trail PAVED REGIONAL Ped.only: 6th to Lake Washington (east) TRAIL-NO Washington(.6 mi) CHANGE DEVIL'S ELBOW TRAIL Edmonds Duvall 1.7 Abandoned local SEPARATED MULTI-Repave(?)and add Avenue NE Avenue street,with sidewalks USE TRAIL,PAVED safety improvements to NE/Coal +BIKE LANES abandoned road Creek Parkway INTERURBAN TRAIL Sumner Tukwila 10 Paved regional trail NO CHANGE RENTON SENIOR Logan Avenue Williams 0.15 Separated multi-use NO CHANGE Confirm ability to share CENTER North Avenue path,paved path alongside Sr. North Center(combine bikes and ped) KING COUNTY PARKS CHIEF SEALTH TRAIL Seattle City Renton City TBD Utility corridor, SEPARATED MULTI-Various options to limits/terminus Limits(west) undeveloped USE TRAIL connection point to of exist.trail Renton CEDAR-SAMMAMISH Cedar River at Issaquah City 1.8 No existing trail PAVED REGIONAL King County Trails TRAIL 154th Avenue SE Limits TRAIL Project;acquisition and route planning in progress SOOS CREEK TRAIL Cedar River Trail Soos Creek 4.5 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Some existing Park(Kent)at trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,PAVED segments;some SE 208th segments being Street developed by King County Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES SECTION CROSS SECTION in Miles TRANSPORTATION DIVISION DUVALL AVENUE NE NE 4th Street/ Coal Creek 2.2 Minor arterial with EXTEND BIKE Carry bike lanes (138th Avenue SE/Coal SE 128th Street Parkway/ sidewalks and bike LANES through intersections. Creek Pkwy) Northern City lanes NE 4th to SR Limits 900 NORTH AND NE 3rd/4th Logan Avenue Eastern City 3 Principal arterial with SEGMENTS OF Existing bike lane STREET BIKE LANES North Limits sidewalks and limited SEPARATED MULTI-begins east of Duvall. bikes lanes USE TRAIL, Carry bike lanes EXTENDED BIKE through intersections. LANES Need mid-block crossing at Post Office. TUKWILA STATION/ Monster Road Tukwila Principal arterial+ SEPARATED MULTI- LONGACRES WAY SW Station collector USE TRAIL,PAVED CONNECTOR(South +BIKE LANES Grady Way and Longacres Way SW) LAKE WASHINGTON West entrance to Park Avenue 1.3 Shared use roadway/ NO CHANGE Long term: add LOOP: Airport North designated bike separate bike/ped. AIRPORT PERIMETER route+bike lanes on bridge over river ROAD&LOGAN Logan crossing at AVENUE NORTH Logan/Airport Rd. Bridge possibly in Parks' purview?Bike lanes planned and funded; long term:improve river crossing at Logan/Airport SE PETROVITSKY ROAD Tukwila/Green Petrovitsky 6 Principal arterial with BIKE LANES Busy,narrow street. BIKE LANES(South 43rd River Trail and Park some sidewalks,short ROW looks to be nearly Street/179th Street/SE Interurban Trail separated multi-use fully utilized.Some ex. Carr Road/SE 176th trail segment near eparated trail at Street) Ridgewood Elem. Ridgewood Elem. NORTH 6th STREET AND Cedar River Trail Bronson Way l 1.12 Garden: Local/minor BIKE LANES Reconfigure GARDEN AVENUE arterial(4th to 6th) median/curb on 6th to NORTH BIKE LANES with sidewalks. 6th: allow bikes to make principal arterial left/southbound turn (minor Park to onto Williams Ave. Garden)with North sidewalks CASCADE TRAIL/27TH Interurban Talbot Road 1.3 Utility corridor, SEPARATED MULTI-23rd: Oakesdale to CONNECTOR Trail/Strander South streets with USE trail&SHARED Shattuck/Shattuck: Blvd sidewalks,exist.0.3 ROADWAY 23rd to S.15th/S.15th: mile segment of Shattuck Avenue S.to S. separated trail west Puget Dr/S.Puget Dr: of Oakesdale Avenue 5.15th S to Cascade SW Park NE 10th STREET NE Sunset Blvd NE 164th St 1.25 Street: collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side OAKESDALE AVENUE SW 7th Street SW 43rd 2.2 Arterial with EXTEND BIKE Extend existing bike SW BIKE LANES Street sidewalks and bike LANES lanes north under 1-405 lanes overpass with 1-405 improvements,to connect with SW 7th Street; Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length SECTION CROSS SECTION NOTES in Miles TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SW 7th Street Renton City 3.25 Collector,bike lanes EXTEND BIKE Bike lane/trail under(- Limits north of SW 43rd LANES 405 could be included (southwest) Street. Some w.I-405 redevelopment sidewalks;on-street school walk route on east side,bike lanes from SW 43rd to S. 200th EDMONDS AVENUE NE NE 4th Street NE 27th 2 Arterial and collector BIKE LANES,NE BIKEWAY Street street with sidewalks 27th to NE 7th Streets SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY NE 7th to NE 3rd Streets RIVERSIDE DRIVE Williams Avenue Bronson Way 0.23 Street:local without SHARED USE NORTH North North sidewalks ROADWAY BENSON ROAD AND South 2nd Street SE 176th 2.5 Minor arterial with BIKE LANES Bike lanes/trail could be MAIN AVENUE SOUTH Street some sidewalks added to Overpass over BIKE LANES 1-405 with 1-405 redevelopment SOUTH 2nd AND 3rd Rainier Avenue Main Avenue 1 Principal arterial,one- SHARED USE Check to see if bike STREET BIKEWAY South South way,with sidewalks ROADWAY lanes can be accommodated thru narrowing of lanes SHATTUCK AVENUE Houser Way South 2nd 0.34 Collector street with BIKE LANES SOUTH BIKE LANES South Street sidewalks 116th AVENUE SE BIKE Beacon Way City Limits 2.5 Minor arterial,exist. SEPARATED MULTI- LANES SE/Puget Drive (south) separated path north USE TRAIL,PAVED SE of SE 168th AND BIKE LANES LAKE/TOBIN! Airport South 2nd 0.4 Local street,with SHARED USE Required to because SHATTUCK BIKE LANES Perimeter Road Street sidewalks ROADWAY 2nd and 3rd are one- way. Alternative would be Logan from Airport Way to 2nd or 3rd. WILLIAMS&WELLS South Grady Way North 6th St 1 Minor arterial,one- SHARED USE Reconfigure crossing at AVENUE BIKEWAY way,with sidewalks ROADWAY 6th to allow bike passage LAKE TO CREEK Burnett Avenue Honey Creek 1.2 Street:collector and BIKE LANES CONNECTOR(North North minor arterials with 30th/Kennewick Place sidewalks and bike North/NE 27th Street) lanes NE 12th STREET Edmonds Union 1 Street: collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY Avenue NE Avenue NE some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side NE SUNSET BLVD/ NE 3rd/NE 4th SE May Valley 2.5 Principal arterial with ADD BIKE LANES SR 900 BIKE LANES Street Road sidewalks MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS Duvall Avenue SE 132nd 1.2 Street:local with SHARED USE SCHOOL ROUTE NE to SE 132nd Street to some sidewalks ROADWAY (Duvall Avenue NE to SE Street to 144th 144th 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE Avenue SE Avenue SE) LINDBERGH/RENTON 108th Avenue SE 128th 2.4 Collector and local SHARED USE PARK SCHOOL ROUTE Avenue SE streets ROADWAY (SE168th Street,128th (Renton Park Avenue SE and SE 164th Elementary) Street) MONROE AVENUE NE NE 4th Street NE 12th 1 Minor arterial with ADD BIKE LANES BIKE LANES Street sidewalks Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length SECTION CROSS SECTION NOTES in Miles SOUTH 3rd PLACE BIKE Rainier Ave. Shattuck Ave. 0.25 Local street LANES South South GREEN RIVER TO LAKE SR 167 Lake Youngs 3.9 Minor arterials BIKE LANES Extend to Kent YOUNGS CONNECTOR (Kent/Green (proposed grade (South 200th St,196th River ultimately) separated crossing of Avenue SE,SE 192nd SR 167)to connect w. Street) Green River 140th AVENUE SE BIKE Maple Valley SE 208th 4.3 Principal arterial. EXTEND BIKE Existing segment SR LANES Hwy(SR 169) Street Existing bikes lanes LANES SOUTH 169 to Petrovitsky(2 SR 169 to SE mi);extend bike lanes Petrovitsky Rd(2 mi). south to S.208th(2.3 mi) PUGET DRIVE SE BIKE Talbot Road 116th 1 Minor arterial with BIKE LANES,or Climbing lanes uphill LANES South Avenue SE limited sidewalks climbing lane at only? and Beacon min. Way SE PARK AVENUE NORTH North 30th North 40th 0.75 Local street SHARED USE BIKEWAY Street Street/Lake ROADWAY Washington Blvd North FAIRWOOD- SE 164th Street Petrovitsky 3.3 Arterial SHARED USE PETROVITSKY PARK Park ROADWAY BIKEWAY UNION AVENUE NE SE 95th Way Dead end 2.1 Minor arterial with ADD BIKE LANES (132nd Avenue NE) (about SE 4th sidewalks Street) TAYLOR AVENUE NW& Northern city SW 7th St 1.4 Shared use roadway/ NO CHANGE HARDIE AVENUE SW limits(toward designated bike BIKEWAY Rainier Avenue route(Collector, South) except Hardie from Renton Ave S to Langston Rd S) ARNOLD PARK Beacon Way BIKEWAY(Cedar South and Cedar Avenue,South 7th Street Avenue and Beacon Way South) SouthE/Puget Puget Drive Local and collector SHARED USE Drive SE SE streets ROADWAY SE 171st WAY BIKEWAY 140th Avenue SE SE 176th 0.41 Street BIKE LANES Street NE 7th STREET NE Sunset Blvd Monroe 0.5 Street: collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY Avenue NE some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side SE MAY VALLEY ROAD Coal Creek Issaquah- 2.4 Rural arterial,no SHARED USE BIKEWAY Parkway Hobart sidewalks ROADWAY Road/SR 900 LAKE WASHINGTON North 8th Street Park Avenue 0.5 Shared use NO CHANGE LOOP:HOUSER WAY North roadway/designated NORTH bike route(Minor Arterial) MONSTER ROAD SW Oakesdale SW 16th 0.7 Collector street with NO CHANGE Avenue Street bike lanes and some SW/Black River sidewalks Trail Head PACCAR Trail: GARDEN North 6th Street Houser Way 0.5 Separated multi-use WIDEN TO MEET Propose name change AVENUE NORTH& North trail on east and STANDARDS,if to distinguish from NORTH 8th south side on minor possible other section of Garden arterial with PACCAR trail. Need to sidewalks determine how much more width is needed. Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION SW 16th STREET Longacres Drive Oakesdale 0.35 Collector street with NO CHANGE Extend to Lind or E. ("Longacres Bikeway") Avenue SW sidewalks and bike Valley Road lanes I f. 6th St , -1 \ _ z 1 14 t I \\,E a III 1 1 iI I `` 1 \ 1 r• �, i 1�1 t17 - "EEE ,� \J o p I I 1l 1 -' -f 1 , ___ / I - 1 - S 11 [ ,1, I Di Renton' / I, I 11 , _, " ''' " I 1 I -•.. Memorial a� _1••••:::c l:1;.: 1 I1 ' • - -. - , Iall i72, ��I u ` I { , Stadi m1 c''oy:.Iq „1 L- '�ti 01 11'•' _ I)111 D / o¢ liLI=I.-1r is c to a`rtonili.i v / • 'ti �. QJ `L`fC•\ n. rbc• ; ; ate; I�'Cenfer-. , +�. I i fi „" `"o 'imp i 1�a I� I; d;.j ?� l I 4-Rive i - •i��`°''�'� 1 co,11-�& ,�I I�,ae,- y .� I� I I 1 I, ., `, 1„,,3E- L;�, 1"—i- II• I oou� :�, Ilk I ®C �/ f:„RentErg Senior) ;;,C�x;:;i_ m. �;r:. = i ., ,i. . I � t3 o1c1o�ell�� � 1iry 1 _,We �_ l d oi`ifW'1;1010-V� r g i'1 �-_t•t�)s-t�e_±,1• ! -__ I0-' '` }Lf ,' 1IE.pro' �q I+j 4 ' „ ' ® / • ''�lIG 11 ❑ .V' _ " `•e1_ I. � o'3a _ ... i1li�ul _dm _ I'_ — t • r 1 -- 'I�I I .„. c° n , �y el:, --,-- L,r-� i -: ' ® 4052- ,-t❑ —S'li'Oblil.tT oLfi'°b '1 = b I •., •, 'pFaiitm 7rk1 -•.mlacii m -`I 11' C 1144 •!i p' y❑ V ___ n t I t'r,� 77 -w9 1 c B /', Cl)iiji [L'-r' l r G I� ''. c Ctn L `� c1 a o e �.� , ` ya, iberty;Ua �� Q� r l-u LcJ4_� 11,. 1f Park" .�Y' ''Y, 1a-k`_,a • i� ❑ �� epton Rentom Iqo " r- jl ,, ".. ., aRentbn. ; L Ya ��High IKEA c p t1 1 f 1 1I x ain{t.. a t4r School—PerEASfs 1� - 7 i . O Cedar. i- Jam-- it 41 t ° I . I I fL I; i w' �L i�1[AafewaY �." .1 1 r-: C 1way I u -1[J 1 1 cma,! it0.6 k. "; River'Park .. 22�_\r'❑o r Park ItyC 1 '1 O 1 �dII I n �L. • i ���1 — IHi orical_,� ti tl a S r3rd Si ' c L�( F I1,, tl� }�z` ,_ 1 L_' er M,-?.; ._, e0ar%�e Ifs\ SCLI�� ! E' r I�L� e ast- �, ?o - o`a .aOfli. �G p �-�� ofi1I' �P `!II mI�L� _ �`' c� o c — .--- ',- • • • • - ,. ; McYe'V j� 3rd F � gg .'' [:.g tii-A. !, y/ ,, -Renton 1 _ S- i jrirS°O,r�--` c",'Gi.4�I • 1 Wil+ 1 • 'il_I "c 16, - - 1•- Ctr ..,\ IrICC�rQ F[ll�.-,.[-j I G'..i P•- •1�1� �. G C. i \ ,.5�` SIC' I�. o�c> 1 1-3 1� I I i I , ISI - `C I' ' - p I� 0, •\4thP IA . C9 c "1 I ��\Fi'"� 'C e'• 12 I�th tit,q-I 11-ys cod 1 Uo., I , ^r - �r ,. • -+ . �C �p ��pa f r IC, Ilg^calarn= L-i j! :, s ice _ 1101__. l :i 11 0� I. �� �.-,-,\111 . ',-,.,2J, ik_ 1i0.- in:co 1 a.'1 a`�li i 1 1,�c = 1 _ _ r �`cc: 1. lI 5 1mi i'� J o e. w, th St Io^ .5[_ ,.:-,_. .' / {', -i [ ��\�I ,::,.,.< „ 10 X11 r o -b i5•• ..�.::: amr. �� r- I I ... D`, f 1 cc 1°" -0 ps 'nett / .. I' c ye \ 3is . l^ `c - Meer O/ I 1! i 1 .-C ,1 O 0 ,1 1 \15 1.O kilo ete� I o j SI I17 E 'a o ♦ ark �I Renton !i I' e; a, SW 7th St — :9�C` : . :i I• :i ��� r �Hry-•iij. 1 1 AP ALE I SOU' E:City.f Rento KI Coun I -------- - -------- - ------ -- t —GIS I-nter,M. 2007 \\ Legend ' EXISTING ROUTES PROPOSED ROUTES WAYFINDING _ . o\r Paved trail,regional 411t/a Multi-use trail,regional 4) .-�_, Paved trail,local ".-- Multi-use trail,local Gateway Location .—, Bicycle Lane VV�isir Bicycle Lane 1r Signed shared roadway •1°it 1 I, Signed shared roadway 0 Kiosk Location — .. Pedestrian only trail `"••►�• Pedestrian only trail ' -- Future rails-trails corridor 0 b' '0 ' Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan O MACLE `a ' Signage Gateways and Kiosks - Downtown CKORD DRAFT 9-11-2008 • r R 010 Lake Wash. Loop & Renton o+o Lake Wash. Loop & Renton i e � e e / k � Y F t, Andrew R. Goulding AIA SEGD MacLeod Reckord 1/23/2008 Bike Route Signs Signage Design a Management E- Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Renton Trails and Layout 1056 25th Avenue East 231 Summit Ave East Bicycle Master Plan Seattle WA 98112-3618 Seattle,Washington 98102 and Map 206 323 7919 Fax 329-4334 Tel 206-329-6350 I I • + ty`, ' r .y.. -,-„,. • '-' 1 Mt .f 1`t �-_hi _ --.0 -..,.., . „.•.it• Olt -is ,, ir.,r,,:., .`. `_ •. ...,_::,,...,,„.,.x.„.,:.4..„..„...,.„..„,, , ,.C. !' I [044:‘,44. ',, .t'"1"` �! S ,r r -HJT.` 'Lake Wash. p ` % ., ; , r , .tiV.‘;".,-': t'u 1 L O Op N n_:v t',„„;N:.-,•-•"'r` W4}t{�'�YY h"h _ � ��,•yy.�. 4+ ` ' 7L ,.� + F.•-• .'P V 'Sc.n "Vf{' ti / ',-.1.)$,:, ;' �+.a _:4-4- --, ,r 7::-''SV!~'' q F''' ? •Y'a'S x� M 1_ ', ra •• �':,I , ; . .� y ♦ Renton f ,.r. r z f - ' ,a -P., 1•r • %f.G' • .-.._,,,. .. ob r' i G1 1yP x p•.y y, :fit+...::w•; J tr'_ ,rw. . i ,_ It t. =I�. .. -..-1• YV�`�`�-,P-�`` .' sC. •-,,-;.4.-:11.:-.-$.4-- ' • .l- 1 441- •I ^ (�^�N nt�, •• .40••.:•-• sem�{,9'4 2' � -."..,.-„r.—,' tj•'//f�'Y!- .r,- ,- _ Z 7R����~-__- 6'- 7 1:04a- ,I ` g� .,.:..:-�• -- - ` U ' ► ';� • 'PORT ) • 4' .i..-,-a. 4jyyy G r!!- Y• �. - - ... T �gAt� .irk n,... t , v t „ .h •, .-.., ` , 'PAfri ly :r4,,_ :f. °�°D;o ....t,„,403,..„� 4 rin•,,r,:"y4 Q`�ti ,' •r, pi.--- .� ai—r- "�' ,-6 •!.r,.� r' r,V;tr, lit '' ♦ i t ."r' .r^.a,,�'" :� �7. r` . er. w..iw. _ a �4\ , e. S �Y-DA .. t 1 6,....0,75211,„±„._....i_.,„..."..,......., 1[ ” 4•.� a2i t �t 4��'` 1 0 0 is, ., .._t �,, 1—,,-,t� : � r ,, I� Lake Wash. !) IUNI- -;: � I ` f 1 Il 3 ; & 11 Loop �1 I �r sky 1 .-: �i� f`• , fl Renton _� — F r4_�ti J G Proposed Signs Andrew R. Goulding AIA SEGD MacLeod Reckord 1/23/2008 Bike Route Signs 2 Signage Design&Management Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Renton Trails and 1056 25th Avenue East 231 Summit Ave East Bicycle Master Plan II Seattle WA 98112-3618 Seattle,Washington 98102 and Map Fax 329-4334 Tel 206-329-6350 206 323 7919 1 I 1 ,t: ti;C - ..3- ms' I I, µ 4...,,,,t:-. • + Tf_fes' - 1 S y LL 'S,Downtown j olio (7,7,-;',..g.;•... , :,p,.....!,../ �Rentonk{ s ' tom-- .'r'Y..Ts'rs �;.---b A .-... ,^ i , Cr,-' {'';. ,-"...'7.4, ir''x .w r ck., \li 11 141.1.1•; -,� - q._ ��y 11 _ =S 'tX� aCr$Y.' yT-"-'.•.Y.Gr".f, ,•Z. _ —� - .____] 1 I, 1 IL4----,1 1 . isis/ M mks cti, uffler ��.� �` � III' j . ,- -- 'ill 0 • F.:'•- - t 15M UTE SERVICE — Y ---4-_-_:_•,. -, 1 I �_ 228-860< f I I _ r—x =_ r,, 301111PPOP7_JC 'rd' 1 .i �`, 'r O O ' - - - 'as `1 or is, rot- rZ+ s • .1 I'u. - 0 1 wn ,,' .'�I[7 r_ ��,.,, .Sr 1'�Rr 1r r..rr _ ,,, P 1 _^ the .I{ '74 44 dh lrEi , r'g 1t,,..-,,,...„,..a..,...., , r,_, '0�...a� r4 Vi,•C 11C- , • -_1 f ---------,>;---,- _./- ice- f / f_. .rr - y y _,2-_--"-____L- -- _r_r _" ?..� r -''�,- 1 I��i� rr f -. .- L h ��155 • t' n 5 1 �- • ,. .7•A" i' .. '1 e, 1, {Renton f c, t - • ;, -e---..,-,3•4-°f x.t t(' A 9"41/4-'`,�+".a a '.' :it,i L ,5"1-i4x /y a . r L Ar7,4 sr i- .tr- y13 :` �tt, r azZ.' '>t''. ''''.:4•' .-4. er a . ' ;el.i i':1 Andrew R. Goulding AlA SEGD MacLeod Reckord 1/23/2008 Bike Route Signs 3 Signage Design&Management f Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Renton Trails and 1056 25th Avenue East 231 Summit Ave East Bicycle Master Plan Seattle WA 98112-3618 Seattle,Washington 98102 and Map 206 323 7919 Fax 329-4334 Tel 206-329-6350 s'.3 y'�i.•..,4,t,..--1,,,,,:, it ;'n }t= v.'S' � � c....:,'''.*-..;;Y `tTt, `, ,.#C'`i `.., r"`..144.,•-,4•42-‘,,,r4.x t' �'t" •E -!...,7,,,-;;,„•,,,-.5-•,••=.-, '` w y`. "�•' ..'+�' ,'4S,'"x ` > )`C*:7, ;,c-41;,4,,:i.-:L . "-'''.� re.4' t ' L}',.,,,?x.0.4,,,,,,,,4 +16' 1•'Ld,. ,y- ?•► ,Y,T.�y q',ir'`, , a •JF_ 1 i +.:. 4 '7-•! • ,',,,,,,,,,v,..„...,0 „ _0%4_4..» ;y'-{+✓'!'- ='£+k ` , }';'..:',--t. ,..1-1,",.,'N: .��y r .a-aP ,,��'''bY' w 1w, 5 :5 _ 'f R • 2^ ..^..17,,,,•;,r r ,,„ , .>/ t '� "3- t�2 .4... `� f 2i ai.0 _ x r . :: 3-. ,�r• •t 4', rir'.� 'lw :;'"'�F7 r[. �'--r•{ r aayyX,,*�"�y��. �.:E ,� saY'•",''��t � ''"S" °'�`r ''+"w:-!' ft x Y Y •� '+' `t •W.-1,%,,,.'•._ �, '�'�,j'F�•.v� r� r• ¢r,.6,..,..:,..:,,,„„..,..,,..., .:4*;' yN.•� s .:y"k.`= St.. rW,, a+ r, 54L'.. -1” l r,L r'F iti ) ..sJ o.4 '.• .; '''''',.,•••,•,,,r•-,' 'e'� rzt .'x, '`'",'♦�• y h 'r'„' k ty'Xs„ t� �y }.' 3 „-:�S'4 { 'n 'o .^".. 1 .. t 'Ma' r'�1:" ,7.4."'1:,:,,, y,4 r Y61 �' ih. {.lK i3 `. 7. Y S . J -,..-,.,:•„,,,,,..!-:-'.;:i.:. `.• • y'r'1°' i Sa��,y +} '� ' �•''''?'"..''r�'r f i r, x �- ;, , st '''?':'...'e� k ,; w • '� � :--..t).;.,-.' rr:'.. � ..j.:, ,�r�h 3 � ,t ' `3,.- yq C .• '4'44•=i",•.1 ,,tK S.n ,M '-5 ,,-,••• W r •••••'''-7. • 1, ,,, ✓ t'' r '1°!:, 7.- ''�'i Frr i xr e Y ,�'" �'�.:i. ak 'a , +��<• !'yK aa u �"K,� a '�• rt .c '*y, lt x �to d 'r* r '• ,.. '••yrpa s„✓�'`�� "'l � '. { a-. ° ,t 'i,'.� + A ✓ �. y i sw�r.?V ".-',';',-,t44,4--., r'�� ,4 ,•e4`tFn t: ;f ri f 3"4 yl �' .Y^'*�G;,*ti4c „'�.y,�WYH ..r d y +4a x R ••r-it:- f�f.14.7c ;�Y Y, x• •¢`' tH .:--'''''....•:^-4'.,;" ',ty fi , i. + „,;:,,,z.,-1.:c.,... , Gt' , '' t ti ' •",' rti�"L + to t'.. $ °” „1yq�'7;474. ^. r 4 ,,v 3 ` 1 ,�Y'*u,”"-v'' • r _ {.yrr, >, l'''' r +.'t ;Yr � �'' AifP.t. 'i,h, ''G4s","7.... ...• `4„ .y tY5"''.r a";.,T ;r" ,b� r% ,'"?F,ti -�''''''''',".4.' ..'' t 41.4.4•• Afp,v140.a.,vii +'a 'f'•an f x t.af4,YS .> r� i r. - r r � ,t�, ,d s � + • "aF e y� ,�>>i�ri 4 r � c�� *� -, ` t` .tic' s t o `� ° �t t, • ar M > rx tr •a phyi '1 e Y a` i -'t R;.� G . k e.' •.r Y,.+•i b f„.•••,•4•„,;i14,2••.,aa `v 0 =at'> r; .Y {, r.,�•4 - x+;� 3• rtU .$£ ?r:'ifkt r_K % i j�iY� s� kr '�' ; g t, M r•t. Bic clists j rr.•;,•.:;•,'''.,:',`. .'$' k`.."y ,¢i x: { "� ; iF:Y •a.” '}t'i, . y •;, ; �,:r�f 5a 4 `.q. A aa,,.''.� 'C wN4' zY? f ,,",:.♦ . -z. f y, r �1'. + 'i> ^k .• j (,,:1,1,,,,,I- ,s s„,,,,•,:4„1,:.,*y {' �^y t, ,a.. M ,. „ ••4 „,,,..,,,,t-i,,.. 0 • x =` -,Z..t r. fC,Mi. t.I.:.• g. x` + �,..'4 x b� �'ITM*e+q�' } e �:k -- �•• ''''' .+•x�'` °am ' '.::, ..Y ';^ �i1 c” •:: 4t i w �; }" �" :,sr-> C�.+ ?4=Ft'7.• k _ )-7.."' ,.. 1, `x'�, " -r0, f�. '' ::'R« >'}t y i r.•s,•...ti. ^z 1,+ g `.+v, t7h ,;'�L!`E:lp • k}'•�. aA� `-"•Y '4i'4• ;t, '....-43;.". w;1-;-P r;,qi--`• .y ,-'4k-=.�• rY� 'x . y ,�•.,/dd��,,} s, "'t Y €' F,��;(�.r-�c� y[�ii "x-,Y,Y'^"-.,-,.--1-4,F;_ ..,'..4Z,-..-'• '"+' •'" F�':N :T�-aa" iy-•;,i,, ,c ",:,A,+' •• M¢, c;„,,,,� a g' :.t�:iY 'P7•'✓`�47'31,---%'' •ti”' •y'N::,,,,p 4 7 ,y � •, { 1 +° s ? `r,<3"-'` `:',S r.r ',y -:` -•-.,..i.: -..,w-'4, By ,•-•• -a'y,.a, 4°,w,,, �7ar �, '''•4t." r,_ ,x r.:p`x.' ,.t --�' ' i � 5�. �"..'e.'_� i . �P.G`P, o Y -',''',1'':.44",X - l 4:1Y ',IYi�P�''r "�,J• C4 :.'i.��, .�, '� .n°•t..., ,•S:^ i,�" 3 Y ,"7,.} ':at. n•,t•�^ ,.'_. . °; 4 st''_ :h'rM'4 `��"F = e., .y', ",. 'x " 124 _ ' '7 • +� ' �';.$�� d •..f,�. .`, •w �.., -$ aw v.�t%• '� •t. ;s �? v'i'a `C' C •bTX `�a� .�`iY '' b.' �'v, �' _ `_ ;r t 4 - _ • .r`.$� p{ �c"ks+3,7 . >r.�..� ;:�.. �1��c'.,,i-, ':,'-=•._•,..,,...1.:-.-, ;,ant v • F• lip • •,,,-,.,.,...,,,,-4,...4,,,,,�, ' Pedestrians ; ' L r« ,d' •'p' � _ --l.J ✓' 44:i4{?;, �r �Kj !�-•, k•#,.$eA"p„..;‘,.';'.;"".;:t`-',,‘;'4--",•• -' a fl g, _ ti °�- ',.":4-':';',:',�; a! s. i,AS,,.t' {. .?:1 a*'., •t'' ;,,TF,- y �sL-.11;r, •.*•J4+t'tP T "_i • t: !ifr,,,. ,•a i * • .-�4•a• r -.:r3ffa �'s"y{ ,� 7 .az. :t.40 r w"°'g�"'' „'t: R.. qx , � s3 :.,. .---4, r ;} :1"- ,•th -d �y�4k w.°,,-C ,,. . f r•..„:'.. YE', .t••;''.,;-•••"".r=,, >+54, •^ �SSf ..4,i,''..:"'', i4 t Ty..-" J. i`'��'� � t• ~t•.,i ,- y S�NiT..1Ett „F. nLrr..+F.,_ ,� �4�i�';iris� > + .fi,-tro'is • R .. ;";'!k '�} bb "-r z :• ,fi-�{ 41.,-.-1',.,., ;� ii,i••r,-,..„,,;-,,e,- -,,.4'; .4'740 �r?a q:��' ..• '�' �r • �.,� ..,,...,:,...i.-...,,%-::. ..., �,,1� • Joint Use �' ' e ; ` . r r• '' ,N, max,'a�7> s;t '' '- 1. 4 r$,L,,3Kara:_• ?, 's 7 rte; 1- ,k , -1 i -.:2140,-•';;.,:,,;,•;.•:,',•. :,,. '4 `^} •�' .:'- .1 a � 3' _ "','t •:r ;:''.'t;.1'Wit. - ;y f1.... S ' r c�•.Y -3! ---`•'.--.' ..2.,r Y. •,.'' .., . >+ s- + :Y. + �s. F.y 4.':tE ''''.V_'''''"..',1,'`':'"'::',:"'''.'" "?i 3 <k. :?ii fi. 4 :,y ', `,4'sit �s1s, �f•*`.4.i...--y, a_ XLa N�( e• x.;.'3.•4 `. •: x'+' 'i.q."r, rJ,,..hr 't • ',F•„'ij »,v _ t- •r St •)4t r;<.- � "i'� 4,.x,-'44, -;41.--..,":!.,r, , 'S'1:.. a +1 - .4.w ,,.•:1•;`1,..;,:4t:/.•:. :• ', °-,. .K ,- .-1;t117:''k; : 4•:rs.,4 C'...,;:,,,..7,1.•'-% y:.3•i'r�:;;!:r';,k`-- ,-: !t--- '�J : .,,,,; ta- 3.x s ' ',,,,;,4.!,, 1 �y V777,-a5'`: 4-_,:.t.::: r!,�•.. .i 7? •u; 1^ a , .r, i•. t „-4:2-4,',..t.'""•'-',' -r% . k”' - '24,...'r " r f6•,;t�'i ' •„ ,-.n:r .,, -4 j;,!cKx, .y t "' ,sH;r ` s'. `+ :,1}-iY::., , , _ ; '.ra y ,;; , ;U 'rtdt ;�' �• ,~;�1Y>� 'a i '.--4,-37:"':i.:,..' �'r~,Y, ',' k -+',;- .. '.i7-T "^.Y"` e �.;i,t-• ,:-.` q'.+t 'y�,i^' ,. , xe p. 71 y ;�;9>� ,•? EC,.�`,'T, . ,t xA.,,•1-, -, 'fro t��c,F •C'-;-.'"-.'---44.-4,-� sdw t,. :,`,{�V -•�'` ",}�•+�F a �` �r` 7` ' '�� 4't�rt�,�^ � •��� ,;.:,;7,•.,,,'-;:-,:4,•, ',r ;'w``4; � �. „,,F,;, 3. 'i�,}p+ .*;tis' r',= �•5:i''' 4-' :'�.i�',°'." a. 4''?J, ua'a<x Ya.$,..,,,,,,,,,i, :.,^ r. u.,,�.„ c�a�'p rt,,, •,y'i':.gra. w k jrE a5✓"' ,.z '''''''4.a y ..;• _4 -r',K r ,��,r.,' ,,,,,,,4e-.,,....„,,,,„4,7.-v:.10,,,,1/477, r ,r• `"''S."i`• 'r:-- .c' ;i �.. •ru- -'P '" rt ,. H,,:n d a 4s.w r t g.t: _ ''�y ''i"`^'3�.. +. :-,,,,,:;,04'',•,--_!--'2 yk _Y:.�'' .,.':a. ''.g,`,bs..'•.: -St° -.... • .a,'.':.1,:e::!•4:-.H r�'w� ,".- '.'i' :. *'` .0.• w�:,�'%:.'r} s. l` _'`E:',`�-yB'''°.�4'.-r..r .y 4• ..iLwi. ; .r wc;';a,:�.`k�.mc,c''L','ik ���' _..�/>`,. - '�^} {' :;'r.vF'a' ••,,,,,,i--,r,--,a"i • - .,',> r;'t'i;:!..>. ':f.ass';e.:', �7:,11,3,=,,,1:51,11,14:-.'.-4,4,-',,Y: s1. - . •,,., °'fr: -_ 'a;'yX."a't g�`1,./0„,.,„,„7. »ti'c' :•} e•: Fa,. { .-t n. "- ','.,•y ,;.•,. <#.i,:'.;s il:'?,-.' -`«s:'.?: •;„ry,+b.'.. •ti; '� ,;."..+,.-d' '.Y..�r iL.'.C'�- - - X17. :rS- ,:ff,^,-r k.;�`,:•'«-L, .y. �., -,y`•. �,ii'•,'Yc.>,a .-'�,, ,,.! q,j,••: .<b,«= . , - - ' .-,,,,..i.,4.._ -'s.r "1' ,t: "i;�i:�` ��-• ,r..�i ,1 ��:',"�;k����..$ ;�t,.�.,. ; .. ,�,, ' ,t .,W`'a :, er .• :",`Ft,� ".�'', '�. r.r !" e',, -``' •.;,':, ''.',41.-%1 ,'i..."-',..":-.,::'11:4 ''i ;��' ,!-.:•:',,,,//.4,.... y.'.314.7, �..x ,..` a, •- K ~, _$''y t .•.,r�: ,g.•....:,•;14,,,„,,,._;4,.,4.,-.. y. rk e� ,:-},, ' =�. ', 5 -.".;a�;ei< P 5 i. +�<< �3 tl �. y.. y ,*s"trM _-;•'*"'y'i: .. �`x:4,rc, .'e'• ^,. ,�, s'„t...-:,:,•. _ = ''s P:3::: ;t„•0:l�tls.., '- t`'..x, {Y .�sYr '• 'yid r: rc... z .t: .c;m. i%$ , - �. .r V1..- •..S•v„`t: ,...-'•••v., ';F'. 't' 'ine-5'P-'- x” ,.s' 1k•V a^� '+ .Y-Y iy ,si, !,'". �;t,' .2•,,r-•... 'c' • w•biC,d• ,=,. r^ _ n.yt.t. {, m. ,rrr ,t,*: i, •«3- R ''''.}1 -i'•'‘.:', _,ti. t t i a' . ''terM1 i,.,.. -oii:'z ,t': ;5« ?" ';'"' °t !..,. ray �r .,.. tk,.�"r �.�i ' ` �R •c`�•,,K' �'`{,,'` .,..,A,-,• ',.�S..F.''kk';': ^!:�4: S �' Ka*.?,r'.'sr. ,,.,.ap..�` -Ce' .+ , .{ s�,c.....>-.'m" x.K a ' { .S? ,+p( fg: ? . •14` ';,'...q'=4”-':,..,,t r r a- -° sY!'T'zC` 1. .s r ..?S*`�{�..',` ' C" t _ F - 1R 4` 5 •i,` ..,,,2 k,-(.?.JIT.-.?, "X7` ,t :•,,,-_-:'4 . '• • , _r.Y;; -•'Ywf ;tiyr;•`r.. 'i'..C-7 4 '4* ,'4i••a`:. •�41.' `+Y-''�i'.7:4'' dav"s,,- '••a, 'F'•1` •;-.,,,... ••••• 4,4:4'`i- t4• _ -,.,--';'-‘,.."'"*;41- ..••• '-';':.:V,`-''': 1 t •-`,' a •F" 9M w:, Yom�.� t ,{„',,A.' S" �I •-...Y''•;y .,#k'. .P ;Y '� t' hrm;� �.+^, i Yla T_'E'«' • ,3,.fi:. ..: :Fr? ',, , ,.,� +y^�, _ ",s. • -L .�'$' 1ti,,ti y'} r .i'.,F.`.,' #yb '`+r r i' .�.i• s :'."'n:=•*t1, ?r,„` .k ,�t::y�',"•,•:1,'•-�rt�,,Ft, 'z'Y ,i j -ate .,sr,$i.,!s,,..� •;.,•,„“101--,t1,-3,,,,..1.., _ .'•t,,,!�'YC? ��� t+r �-�``•�� f���'�'�7.:'' .{4ri�r.. �� '.tom" !.r �� ''�-t� d`1� r:_ 't :' R,A,,.4i,'4.i . r yY °' ?..x •-4.4.,‘1.-ii ,fir y';,-"').-;:', .:-,-,,,*:,f,-,..'":...:' . j', ' - •-:',:--..t.,.',4-; r„: 'Y`' • vj x ,.` et"t• *,,x,, , {-:,,,{ .- -`._-z�."•`-,zt''' x a w:»r . .1 tin:,. '„L----'-'''''".-1''.Cl'b,•.`": -,-*-:•,..t-a,�.: " .,. Sd'-Y -F ''"� • '-' .H"..• .,:t',,.„:2144,17.-4;;;",';a, , ';'4, `:':",t'." �' ;`,°: .' iH'!,, •err`''•:e:' _:e-,•...',t•-•;-'. �' w ,,;,• . ,,..:•,:....,,,,t,,,,4.‘„,-,-•-•;,..,, :.s•:E;,w.•s'•;,''°.,,• :ifi f ..: ,Y ▪ yf.. y:+l {'t ,'�. - r.' til; 4-4,.,•. z.,'" ,n"'s:- ',.Y'!. I 9 •.#• •:b,'.-'. x."1: . :r- 1•. T::....,:,..`"!'..1 8 : - ,PA^> .R- ;.:t ,i"- ",-.-4::4!L'`' ,9 'L-y..� _;,,,!,,,2.,,•„::',-,,,,,,i,-4,.;p,,,,„ ..: !rr„,.....,,,..-p •e>n,:•,.-.1 - •�,,. ��` c: •••=-'„. ,:' <`��;' �. � •_�.��: - ,- '. V'�i� •'.�-'y:?± ::'�"Y-'` - •.s`r: ..1� `�{'i•i 1.:': :3� -fC', , ,+5� :. Y •,,,,• '., -r, f,, -4.+`;i.. Yf;• .:�t r4- 3Y. '-��.�r;{. ,rvcF a,. _ :1.-.`,C'.•--,; - "',M u -,,:i„,;;;-:,,-...-i 'a.. ..s.i.. _ sS` n,'"-::r ,,'..;,,;- ,a•u of -iN':; _: ..,,'.r:. p. 5?k, '` ” ,'i f ',.Ac-`.4.-:.,�..f- , +. :.+,r y..`r T.+.^ S F,°t- :':,i---s SY"J.F ,?-t.:.a ;,(.�i•+i::r�7..>^.,`--:M. .^.:•3, :.t "";i'_:' i•.tir,.:M6.. ,is�za'fY:�l ..•`,'A'1�•, 'F,s'1`ek .`,,,:.,.•.1,,;;;;,,,,,....r;.;,;� ".i4.:,�.�, •,.�Y., �''K•%.,44,'��`a...-.N.•' .'•ei 4h'ar1�.' . c:..t.' -f5,,, *"-'-'''4`Z..fiR=:S:,ia;�.�- -Tp.�.",y�" sof; r ,. ,.'sem, '�=`3..,. Y✓>k'' 'f* ' „,„...„,,,„4„,_.....„„,,,, ,,,s,-4 .�{ « C ,..i.: , 'rx '� .tJ .a�#,`•Y'.�S�S.p�•' :;- r it 'ivr •r•s --Ai,' '�k `e.. =ry"'•3'�:'r,- �`�•%:- ,°9`1 0'c P,` ! Q ” fa x'#•t;�,- firm.. �#.4 ,c , Y'' r,�Y, -t' '.n�. ¢e.� i.,-,;...i..... r", •- "`K.�t. s u}Giy, - -- ;. � -K#} ` t't�.'.• 1.• 4•.. -,y`i '"�'s�-�'• •"ti `,.,.. a• r_L�• .y '`t�,C•:r y'., . � `�•y• '• `�>�'�� > S f ,s=` F. ,fr ,.y,,,«. ;', . `f ;!t';'',-..„...:. , �--,-Y;•:" .` f ' '....‘!."13,*_,'• v,. � -it` lr 2!'%y�.�, .*,'..:4 •.-k'"`2 _, '� ,,l.. ;,....„ ,_ar .i ;:«r'` •t` ��,p���^ti ,+�f='y�:;t',�_y � �•`' ,-,1.--,,,z r• q: r• `Y,ty�a,rc', • �sr•>�`3�'L" 'tr' -+�. I-2-V-:',1.4„" ' ' 'bl :"�e•` . 's. ��NF� � a�' o r=,Y`:�e�§X :.'�: f y">'n " ,:: r' L;. ':rr,.: Ft :. '' 4;."`-.7.4•:!.•'.1-,-..,- • ,;� N.�.,_ -c;e .�..vt ti• `.* .yf+,.� _ 1+x.M ".:,;1;,::,*. :%-,- .•,,•::,-;...,•• _ -itxce. �'�`" - �r-. ... .. `..4, .rfl D Andrew R. Goulding AIA SEG MacLeod Reckord /2s/loos Roadside 4 Landscape Architecture Signage Design a Management P Planning Urban Design Renton Trails and Caution Signs 1056 25th Avenue East 231 Summit Ave East Bicycle Master Plan Seattle WA 98112-3618 Seattle,Washington 98102 and Map Fax 329-4334 Tel 206-329-6350 206 323 7919 . r 4 ---- J f Parke 0 . 1 ffp Gars Shared a Lanes i 4 `___= Markers at - ; ;j ' Designated f Lanes 1 ' .) , II I Bicyclist Symbol Andrew R. GouldingAIA SEGD MacLeod Reckord 1/23/2008 5 Pavement Markers Signage Design 8 Management Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Renton Trails and 1056 25th Avenue East 231 Summit Ave East Bicycle Master Plan Seattle WA 98112-3618 Seattle,Washington 98102 and Map 206 323 7919 Fax 329-4334 Tel 206-329-6350 DRAFT , PART ., 4: BAC KG RO U N D/ PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW .` ;lei .. �� i44 r.: ' .! 1 a S,,, :., qt.`c '' -,4- s ,i),,'•::':: . t' ( \` i , F r t .. 'iit.%.:, r . ' 1: r r _.04- / .'.N tiarei - - - - - ,r _O . . i Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 83 DRAFT PART 4: BACKGROUND/PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS PLANS AND POLICIES A major task in the development of this trails and bikeways Master Plan was the review of previous planning documents and policies and the identification of information relevant to this plan. Planning for non-motorized facilities is addressed at all levels of government: local, region/county, state, and federal, and numerous plans were reviewed to ensure con- currency with current regional planning efforts and to avoid contradictory recommendations with previous planning ef- forts. At each level of government the messages about bicycle and pedestrian facilities is echoed: to make communities more livable, make them accessible by foot and bicycle. Provide safe and convenient routes through thoughtful design and arrange land uses to make destinations more accessible so people can and will choose to make non-motorized and tran- sit trips rather than driving. The primary basis of the review was the City's Comprehen- sive Plan, its open space plan, and most importantly, existing non-motorized plans: for trails (1993) and for walkways. Several regional plans also held particular relevance for this study. Finally, state and federal planning-level documents were reviewed. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING EFFORTS Comprehensive Plan Several sections of the Comprehensive Plan address non- motorized facilities: the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Element; the Transportation Element; and the Commu- nity Design Element. Non-motorized facilities are addressed both directly and indi- rectly in several goals of the Transportation Element: Goal 1: Contribute to a balanced multi-modal transportation system through reasonable, planned, economically feasible arterial improvements that enhance HOV and transit opera- tions, support adopted land use plans, protect or improve business access, and protect Renton's neighborhoods. , Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 85 DRAFT Goal 2: Maximize the use of transit in Renton by providing step-by-step improvements to produce regionally linked and locally oriented transit services and facilities needed to serve travel demand generated by Renton residents and busi- nesses. Goal 4: Maintain, enhance and increase pedestrian and bicy- cle travel by providing both safe and convenient routes and storage for the commuting and recreating public. The Non-motorized Transportation section further articulates these goals by stating that the plan is designed to"enhance the quality of life in Renton, to improve walking and bicycling safety, and to support the pedestrian and bicycle transporta- tion modes as alternatives to the use of automobiles." The plan's objectives include the following: • Recognize and capitalize upon the multi-functionality of non-motorized facilities: accommodate both com- muting and recreational uses • Enhance both internal circulation and linkages to re- gional routes and destinations • Provide connections to open space areas and other recreational opportunities • Ensure a comprehensive, interconnected non- motorized network • Facilitate connections to transit facilities • Recognize and accommodate the diversity of non- motorized travel modes, user abilities (ensuring ADA compliancy of new facilities) and trip purposes • Add hiking trails,water trails, canoe launches The Non-motorized section acknowledges that that the City's existing transportation system has not been oriented toward accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists and the policies. The non-motorized plan, therefore, provides a framework to reevaluate the existing system for the needs of pedestrian and bicyclists, and to provide for a better environment for non-motorized travel. Approximately a dozen policies provide a basis for expanding and enhancing the existing network, addressing the following aspects: • Bicyclists and pedestrians • Transit use • Universal access • The interrelation of the motorized network to the non- motorized 86 City of Renton DRAFT • The diversity of transportation modes/user groups and trip purposes • Separation between modes/users and safety of users • Hiking • Water trails The existing bicycle and pedestrian network is briefly de- scribed and evaluated and proposed routes are listed. Outside of the central business district, the Plan states that bicycles are allowed to share the sidewalks with pedestrians, provided they yield to those on foot. At the same time, the plan encourages the separation of modes, in the name of safety, to the greatest degree possible. As the City's network expands, this policy may need to be reevaluated in light of creating a more hospitable and safe environment for pedestri- ans. Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Element The following objectives and policies within the Parks, Rec- reation, Open Space, and Trails Element deal with non- motorized facilities: Objective P-F: Create a walkable community by developing and maintaining a comprehensive trails system that provides non-motorized access through the City, maximizes public ac- cess to parks, schools, and open space areas, connects to regional trail systems, and provides increased recreational opportunities for the public. Policy P-63: Trails should provide for the needs of a diverse population of users including groups such as adults, children, seniors, workers, the disabled and other people engaging in either passive and/or active pursuits including: a. pedestrians, b. recreation bicyclists, c.joggers/runners, d. in-line skaters, e. bicycle commuters f. canoeists and kayakers, and g. hikers. Policy P-66: Linkages should be provided with surrounding communities within major regional corridors such as the Ce- dar River, Green River, the Lake Washington Loop, and the Soos Creek Trail. Policy P-68: Integrate Renton's recreational trail needs into a comprehensive trail system serving both local and regional users. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 87 DRAFT Policy P-69: Plan and coordinate appropriate pedestrian and bicycle commuter routes along existing minor arterial and col- lector arterial corridors. Policy P-69: Plan and coordinate appropriate pedestrian and bicycle commuter routes along existing minor arterials and collector arterial corridors. Policy 78: Provide opportunities for the public to access, via Lake Washington, the "Lakes to Locks" regional water trail system. Again, the separation between foot/bicycle and between trails and roadway, where possible, is advocated. Community Design Element The section on streets, sidewalks and streetscape in the Community Design Element promotes pedestrian-friendly de- sign through a number of objectives and policies aimed at more detailed design considerations. One policy in particular, however, suggests a number of important criteria for enhanc- ing non-motorized connectivity: Policy CD-60. Criteria should be developed to locate pedes- trian and bicycle connections in the City. Criteria should con- sider: • Linking residential areas with employment and corn- mercial areas; • Providing access along arterials; • Providing access within residential areas; • Filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system where ap- propriate; and • Providing access through open spaces and building entries to shorten walking distances In conclusion, the inclusion, enhancement and promotion of non-motorized facilities are supported on many levels through the City's Comprehensive Plan. 1993 Trails Master Plan The 1993 Trails Master Plan is a thorough and well- considered plan for the development of a trail system in and around Renton, the first of its kind for the City. It was adopted as part of the Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Plan, The plan reflects a focus on open space, preser- vation, and recreation, and was created through a compre- hensive community involvement process. The plan breaks the City up into six geographic planning ar- eas (though the City now uses slightly different planning ar- eas), based on boundaries formed by major vehicular trans- 88 City of Renton DRAFT portation corridors or major geographic features: Interstate 405, State Routes 900 (Sunset Boulevard), 167 (the Valley Freeway), and 169 (Maple Valley Road and the Cedar River). Within these areas, the plan identifies the major corridors and travel routes for non-motorized travel: • Northeast Corridors: East Shore Lake Washington, May Creek/Honey Creek • East Corridors: Renton-Issaquah • Southeast Corridors: Cedar River, Seattle and Mercer Island Waterlines • Southwest Corridors: Orillia-Petrovitsky, Green River Valley • West Corridor: Black River • Northwest Corridor: West Shore Lake Washington Each of the proposed corridors, and subsequently the feasi- bility of the proposed routes, is thoroughly analyzed. The plan recommends a separate, hierarchical system of major and minor trails for pedestrians (24 routes) and bicyclists (28 routes). Many routes share the street right-of-way, and five are mixed use, along separated rights-of-way. Appendix X • lists the routes proposed in the 1990 plan and their current status. In addition, the plan details trail standards and puts forth an • implementation plan. Though the proposed routes are not all still valid, and conditions throughout the City have changed, the plan provides an excellent foundation and resource for non-motorized planning today. It is interesting to contrast the 1990 plan's focus on open space, preservation, and recrea- tion with the current climate of non-motorized planning, with the greater emphasis on bicycling as a mode of transporta- tion. 2003 Draft Trails Plan The more recent current trails plan provides an updated in- ventory of existing and planned trails, and serves as plan- ning-level resource. It identifies 31 trails or routes, for both hiking and biking, de- i scribing in general terms the existing conditions and pro- posed character(surfacing, primarily) of each trail. In addi- tion, connections and destinations (parks or facilities) are mapped on top of aerial photographs for each route. Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study (2003) The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study is in some ways the counterpart to the trails and bikeways plan. The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 89 DRAFT study features a detailed analysis of how pedestrians are ac- commodated in the City's existing street network and an iden- tification of the missing links in the system. It also includes detailed analyses and strategies for building out sidewalks— cross-section options, evaluation/prioritization systems, time- lines, cost estimates, and funding options. The overall purpose of this study differs somewhat from the Trails and Bikeways Plan, with its focus on inventory, identifi- cation of missing links and the implementation of sidewalks. However, the study is a valuable complement to the Trails and Bikeways Plan. Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Imple- mentation Plan (2003) The adopted Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space Plan presents a valuable mix of big-picture and more detailed analysis of the City's public lands, present and proposed. Parks and open spaces are important trip generators for non- motorized travel. The identification of existing and future des- tinations is an important component of the Renton Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. In addition, the plan nicely describes the City's physical setting —natural features, topography, and character. REGIONAL LEVEL Destination 2030: Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Central Puget Sound Region (revised 2006) The Puget Sound Regional Council developed Destination 2030 to provide a strategy for making regional decisions re- lated to growth, transportation, and other elements that affect the quality of life for residents of the region. The report proposes strategies to curb trends leading to greater congestion, many of which support and encourage non-motorized improvements. Specific policies that support the Trails and Bikeways Plan echo the policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, last revised in 2006, was prepared as a first step toward implementation of the policies set forth in Vision 2030 and Destination 2030, a re- gional planning document that provides a strategy for deci- sions related to growth and transportation. The MTP identi- fies the need to invest in three major program areas: • Development of a Regional Network of Non-motorized Transportation Facilities. 90 City of Renton DRAFT • Development of Local Networks for Non-motorized Travel. • Development of Transit Access for Pedestrians and Cyclists. In addition, the MTP includes a map demarcating a Prelimi- nary Regional Non-motorized Network, which includes major separated trails or bikeways and shared use bikeways or walkways. Appendix 9 "Projects" identifies transportation im- provements; both motorized and non-motorized that are for- mally part of Destination 2030. Data obtained from these list- ings will be used as an aid in developing this plan. King County Regional Trail Inventory and Implementa- tion Guidelines (2004) The City of Renton is sited at the juncture of several impor- tant regional trails. King County's regional trail inventory ex- amines each trail in its system, identifying missing links and proposing short-term and long-term uses for each of these corridors. The regional trails/corridors that pass through or near Renton include: • Interurban Trail • Green River • Lake Washington Loop • Cedar River Trail • Soos Creek Trail • Future Cedar To Sammamish Trail Connections to and between these trails will provide both re- gional and local trail-user benefits and will be a priority of this plan. Of particular interest and priority to King County are connections between the following regional trail corridors: • Green River/Interurban Trail and Cedar River Trail/ Lake Washington Loop • Cedar River Trail and East Lake Sammamish Trail • Cedar River and Soos Creek Trails • Future Cedar to Sammamish Trail Making these connections has also been identified by the public as the highest priority for Renton's non-motorized net- work. Left by the Side of the Road: Puget Sound Regional Bi- cycle Network Study, Assessment and Recom- mendations (Cascade Bicycle Club, 2005) This document purports to be the "most detailed assessment of bicycle routes ever performed" in the Puget Sound region. The study examines existing conditions, identifies missing Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 91 I ; DRAFT links and prioritizes key connections. It also rates existing bike routes with a pass or fail rating based on a number of different factors. The plan examines routes through Downtown Renton, and rates the NE 3rd/4th St route "fail." In addition, the plan identifies a missing link called the "Black River Connector Trail," which would connect the Interurban Trail with the Black River Trail (enabling a connection with the Lake Washington Loop)via 68th S/Monster Rd and Ft. Dent Park in Tukwila. This trail segment has appeared in other plans as the "Fort Dent Connector" and is also seen as a high priority by King County. As with King County's regional trail plan, improvements and completion of these routes would provide benefits beyond just the City of Renton, and are given high priority accord- ingly. 1-405 Corridor Improvements The 1-405 Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects is a multi-modal strategy that features a number of bicycle and pedestrian improvements through jurisdictions along the corridor, as part of the larger 1-405 Corridor Improvements Project. Six improvements are identified in the Renton/ Tukwila area and will help complete the non-motorized net- work. Some of these improvements, including some in Ren- ton, are described in the first phase of the master plan, and will be funded through the Washington State Department of Transportation 2003 "Nickel" Funding Package. Others are planned for future phases of the project, to be funded through I , various funding mechanisms (see Appendix). Shorter-term enhancement possibilities associated with the I- 405 improvements include the widening of several routes that pass under or over 1-405: • Oakesdale Avenue Southwest • Talbot Road South • Benson Road South These routes are currently not wide enough to safely accom- modate bicycles and pedestrians. The City is working with WSDOT to create safer non-motorized routes as these corri- dors are redeveloped. BNSF Rail Corridor Preservation Study King County and the Port of Seattle are considering a pur- 92 City of Renton DRAFT chase and land swap deal that would allow the approximately 65-mile Burlington Northern Sante Fe rail corridor for devel- opment as a trail. The BNSF line is the route of the former Spirit of Washington Dinner Train, whose terminus was in downtown Renton at Burnett Avenue South. BNSF temporar- ily closed the line in 2007 to allow improvements to bridges through downtown Renton. The corridor will still be used to move fuselages between the Boeing Renton Plant and Everett. Details for the development of the corridor were be- ing negotiated during the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan proc- ess. The development of the corridor would provide several important opportunities for trail connections/trail heads, and access to the central business district, transit, and some parks/community centers through Renton. These potential connections will be incorporated into the Trails and Bikeways Plan. See Appendix for corridor maps. STATE LEVEL Washington's Transportation Plan (WTP) 2007-2026 (2006) The WTP recognizes the many benefits bicycling and walking provide to a community: environmental, health, and a reduc- tion in congestion and positive economic impact. "Innovation should also facilitate readily available alternative transporta- tion, including bicycles and walking, which conserve energy and contribute to personal health." The goals of the Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian Walkways Plan are to in- crease non-motorized travel while also increasing safety, through the following strategies: • Maximizing funding through partnerships • Raising awareness of the needs for bicycle and pe- destrian safety • Sharing information on bicycle and pedestrian issues between agencies,jurisdictions, and organizations in Washington State. Increasing safety is a major focus of the plan, and it proposes to do this through engineering, education and enforcement. Recommendations within Renton's Trails and Bikeways Plan will meet the following criteria for the funding of projects through state funds: • Improving intersections by providing: curb extensions, lighting, raised median, crosswalk enhancements, signs, signals, and mid-block crossing treatments Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 93 DRAFT TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS This master plan uses a variety of terms to describe pro- posed and facilities/improvements for bicyclists and pedestri- ans. These terms are adapted from WSDOT Design Manual, Section 1020 Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle route—An officially designated system of facilities for use by bicyclists. A series of bicycle facilities may be combined to establish a continuous route and may consist of any or all types of bicycle facilities. Bike lane—A portion of a highway or street identified by signs and pavement markings intended for exclusive use by bicycles. Dedicated facility—a bike lane, path or other improvement for the exclusive use by bicycles and/or pedestrians Facility—general term used to describe a set of improve- ments or measures designed to accommodate bicycles or pedestrians Path— In this master plan, the term path is used to denote an informal route, such as a footpath or desire path. Shared roadway—a roadway that is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel. This may be an existing roadway, a street with wide curb lanes, or a road with paved shoulders. Shared-use or multiuse path/trail—a facility, often within a road-right-of-way, that is physically separated from motor ve- hicle traffic and designed for use by a variety of non- motorized users. Signed shared roadway—a roadway that has been desig- nated as a route for bicycle use by signing and/or other measures intended to increase safety and convenience for bicycles. Trail—according the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999), "in many states, the term trail means an unimproved recreational facility". In this master plan, the term trail is used to denote an official non-motorized facility, whether planned or existing, and will be used with qualifying descriptors, such as multi-use trail Walkway—pedestrian facilities that can be either separated from roadways, such as sidewalks and paths, or part of road- ways, such as crosswalks or wide shoulders. Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 95 DRAFT BIBLIOGRAPHY Cascade Bicycle Club. 2005. Left by the Side of the Road: Puget Sound Regional Bicycle Net- work Study, Assessment and Recommendations. City of Kent. 2007. City of Kent Transportation Master Plan. City of Newcastle. 2003. Comprehensive Plan, Figure PTR-2, Newcastle Trail System. City of Renton. 2004. Comprehensive Plan. City of Renton. 1993. Trails Master Plan. City of Renton. 2003. Draft Trails Plan. City of Renton. 2003. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Implementation Plan. City of Renton. 2003. Comprehensive Walkway Study. City of Tukwila. 2007. City of Tukwila Draft Non Motorized Plan. AASHTO (American Assocation of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 1999. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Prepared by the AASHTO Task Force on Geometric De- sign. HDR, Bellevue, WA. 2007. BNSF Rail Corridor Preservation Study. Puget Sound Regional Coun- cil. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.psrc.orq/projects/bnsf/index.htm. King County. 1992. King County Regional Trail Plan. King County Parks, Planning Resources Department, Parks Division. King County. 2004. Regional Trail Inventory and Implementation Guidelines. King County De- partment of Natural Resources and Parks. King County. 2007. HealthScape: Community Design for Health and the Environment/ Sustainability through Healthy Community Design. www.metrokc.gov/HealthScape National Center for Safe Routes to School. Retrieved 3-26-08 from www.saferoutesinfo.orq. Nelson, Alyse. 2007. Livable Copenhagen: The Design of a Bicycle City. Center for Public Space Research, Copenhagen and University of Washington, Seattle. Pedestrian and Bicycling Information Center. 2007. Shared Use Paths. Retrieved 3.26.2008 from www.bicyclinginfo.orq/enqineerinq/paths-principles.cfm Puget Sound Regional Council. 2003. Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Implementation Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region 9. Accessed from www.psrc.orq/protects/nonmotorized/ implementation/ch2.pdf Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 97 DRAFT Puget Sound Regional Council. No. T17, November 2001. Biking and Walking in the Central Puget Sound Region. Accessed from http://www.psrc.orq/publications/pubs/trends/tl7nov01.pdf Puget Sound Regional Council. November 2003. Puget Sound Trends: Census 2000 Data Illus- trate Diverse Commute Modes. Accessed from www.psrc.orq/publications/pubs/trends/ t21 nov03.pdf Puget Sound Regional Council. Revised 2006. Destination 2030: Metropolitan Transportation -) Plan for the Central Puget Sound. Retrieved 3-26-2008 from www.psrc.orq/proiects/mtp/index.htm Tracy-Williams Consulting. 1996. Bike Plan Source: Specific Roadway Environments. Re- trieved 3.26.2008 from www.bikeplan.com/roads.htm Washington Department of Transportation. 2006. Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) 2007- 2026. Washington Department of Transportation. 2006. WSDOT Design Manual. Chapter 1020: Bicy- cle Facilities. Accessed from www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/Policy/DesignManual/ DMChapters/DM1020 06 Nov.pdf Washington Department of Transportation. 2007 Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) Manual. 98 City of Renton APPENDICES A. Master List of Proposed Improvements and Existing Facilities B. Summary of Comments from Public Open Houses C. List of Routes in 1990 Trail Plan and Status D. Map of Renton Schools and Parks E. Map of Issaquah Schools F. Map of Kent Schools G. Puget Sound Regional Council List of Non-motorized Improvements H. 1-405 Proposed Improvement Projects in Renton I. 2009-2014 TIP J. Non-motorized Funding Sources RENTON TRAILS&BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Table 3.MASTER LIST: EXISTING +PROPOSED ROUTES AND FACILITIES 9/11/2008 Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION PROPOSED ROUTES,in alphabetical order 116th AVENUE SE BIKE Beacon Way City Limits 2.5 Minor arterial,exist. SEPARATED MULTI. LANES SE/Puget Drive (south) separated path north USE TRAIL,PAVED SE of SE 168th AND BIKE LANES 140th AVENUE SE BIKE Maple Valley SE 208th 4.3 Principal arterial. EXTEND BIKE Existing segment SR 169 LANES Hwy(SR 169) Street Existing bikes lanes LANES SOUTH to Petrovitsky(2 mi); SR 169 to SE extend bike lanes south Petrovitsky Rd(2 mi). to 5.208th(2.3 mi) ARNOLD PARK Beacon Way BIKEWAY(Cedar South and Avenue,South 7th Street Cedar Avenue _ and Beacon Way South) SouthE/Puget Puget Drive Local and collector SHARED USE Drive SE SE streets ROADWAY BENSON ROAD AND South 2nd Street SE 176th 2.5 Minor arterial with BIKE LANES Bike lanes/trail could be MAIN AVENUE SOUTH Street some sidewalks added to Overpass over I. BIKE LANES 405 with 1-405 redevelopment BURNETT AVENUE South 7th Street Cedar River 1 Collector/linear park SHARED USE SOUTH LINEAR AND Trail with paved path and ROADWAY PEDESTRIAN PARK sidewalks& separated multi-use path&street CASCADE TRAIL/27TH Interurban Talbot Road 1.3 Utility corridor, SEPARATED MULTI 23rd: Oakesdale to CONNECTOR Trail/Strander South streets with USE trail& Shattuck/Shattuck: 23rd Blvd sidewalks,exist.0.3 SHARED to S.15th/S.15th: mile segment of ROADWAY Shattuck Avenue S.to S. separated trail west Puget Dr/S.Puget Dr: S. of Oakesdale Avenue 15th S to Cascade Park SW CEDAR-SAMMAMISH Cedar River at Issaquah City 1.8 No existing trail PAVED REGIONAL King County Trails TRAIL 154th Avenue Limits TRAIL Project;acquisition and SE route planning in progress CHIEF SEALTH TRAIL Seattle City Renton City TBD Utility corridor, SEPARATED MULTI.Various options to limits/terminus Limits(west) undeveloped USE TRAIL connection point to of exist.trail Renton DUVALL AVENUE NE NE 4th Street/ Coal Creek 2.2 Minor arterial with EXTEND BIKE Carry bike lanes through (138th Avenue SE/Coal SE 128th Street Parkway/ sidewalks and bike LANES intersections. Creek Pkwy) Northern City lanes NE 4th to SR Limits 900 EDMONDS AVENUE NE NE 4th Street NE 27th 2 Arterial and collector BIKE LANES,NE BIKEWAY Street street with sidewalks 27th to NE 7th Streets SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY NE 7th to NE 3rd Streets FAIRWOOD- SE 164th Street Petrovitsky 3.3 Arterial SHARED USE PETROVITSKY PARK Park ROADWAY BIKEWAY GREEN RIVER TO LAKE SR 167 Lake Youngs 3.9 Minor arterials BIKE LANES Extend to Kent YOUNGS CONNECTOR (Kent/Green (proposed grade (South 200th St,196th River ultimately) separated crossing of SR Avenue SE,SE 192nd 167)to connect w. Street) Green River Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION HONEY CREEK TRAIL Honey Creek/ Union 1.25 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI Hiking/walking May Creek Avenue NE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,SOFT confluence SURFACE LAKE TO CREEK Burnett Avenue Honey Creek 1.2 Street:collector and BIKE LANES CONNECTOR(North North minor arterials with 30th/Kennewick Place sidewalks and bike North/NE 27th Street) lanes LAKE WASHINGTON West entrance to Park Avenue 1.3 Shared use roadway/ NO CHANGE Long term: add separate LOOP: Airport North designated bike bike/ped.bridge over AIRPORT PERIMETER route+bike lanes on river crossing at ROAD&LOGAN Logan Logan/Airport Rd. AVENUE NORTH Bridge possibly in Parks' purview?Bike lanes planned and funded; long term:improve river crossing at Logan/Airport LAKE/TOBIN/ Airport South 2nd 0.4 Local street,with SHARED USE Required to because 2nd SHATTUCK BIKE LANES Perimeter Road Street sidewalks ROADWAY and 3rd are one-way. Alternative would be Logan from Airport Way to 2nd or 3rd. LIBERTY PARK Cedar River Trail Bronson Way 0.2 Public park;informal SEPARATED MULTI,Need a bikeway on east CONNECTOR North/ access through USE trail,PAVED side of park to connect Factory Cedar River Trail and Avenue Garden Ave. North LINDBERGH/RENTON 108th Avenue 128th 2.4 Collector and local SHARED USE PARK SCHOOL ROUTE SE Avenue SE streets ROADWAY (SE168th Street,128th (Renton Park Avenue SE and SE 164th Elementary) Street) MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS Duvall Avenue ▪SE 132nd 1.2 Street:local with SHARED USE SCHOOL ROUTE NE to SE 132nd Street to some sidewalks ROADWAY (Duvall Avenue NE to SE Street to 144th 144th 132nd Street to 144th Avenue SE Avenue SE Avenue SE) MAY CREEK TRAIL Lake Coal Creek 2.5 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI-Missing link Lake Washington Blvd Parkway trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,SOFT Washington to Lake North (Cougar SURFACE Washington Blvd Mountain County Park) MONROE AVENUE NE NE 4th Street NE 12th 1 Minor arterial with ADD BIKE LANES BIKE LANES Street sidewalks NE 10th STREET NE Sunset Blvd NE 164th St 1.25 Street: collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side NE 12th STREET Edmonds ▪Union 1 Street: collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY Avenue NE Avenue NE some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side NE 7th STREET NE Sunset Blvd ▪Monroe 0.5 Street collector with SHARED USE Existing on-street trail BIKEWAY Avenue NE some sidewalks;on- ROADWAY separated with curb street school walk route on south side NE SUNSET BLVD/ NE 3rd/NE 4th SE May Valley 2.5 Principal arterial with ADD BIKE LANES SR 900 BIKE LANES Street Road sidewalks Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION NORTH 6th STREET Cedar River Trail Bronson Way 1.12 Garden: Local/minor BIKE LANES Reconfigure AND GARDEN AVENUE arterial(4th to 6th) median/curb on 6th to NORTH BIKE LANES with sidewalks. 6th: allow bikes to make principal arterial left/southbound turn (minor Park to onto Williams Ave.North Garden)with sidewalks NORTH AND NE 3rd/4th Logan Avenue Eastern City 3 Principal arterial with SEGMENTS OF Existing bike lane begins STREET BIKE LANES North Limits sidewalks and limited SEPARATED MULTI.east of Duvall. Carry bike bikes lanes USE TRAIL, lanes through EXTENDED BIKE intersections. Need mid- LANES block crossing at Post Office. OAKESDALE AVENUE SW 7th Street SW 43rd 2.2 Arterial with EXTEND BIKE Extend existing bike SW BIKE LANES Street sidewalks and bike LANES lanes north under 1-405 lanes overpass with 1-405 improvements,to connect with SW 7th Street; PANTHER CREEK TRAIL Springbrook Lake Street 2 No existing trail multi-use trail,SS 1.7 to City Limits,2.8 to Watershed Park Springbrook Watershed Park. Could be included as part of 1-405 redevelopments. Include connection to Edlund Property. PARK AVENUE NORTH North 30th North 40th 0.75 Local street SHARED USE BIKEWAY Street Street/Lake ROADWAY Washington Blvd North PUGET DRIVE SE BIKE Talbot Road 116th 1 Minor arterial with BIKE LANES,or Climbing lanes uphill LANES South Avenue SE limited sidewalks climbing lane at only? and Beacon min. Way SE RIVERSIDE DRIVE Williams Avenue Bronson Way 0.23 Street:local without SHARED USE NORTH North North sidewalks ROADWAY SAM CHASTAIN Cedar River Trail Gene Coulon 0.7 No existing trail MULTI-USE TRAIL Not intended for bikes; MEMORIAL TRAIL Park +BOARDWALK on hold indefinitely. SE 171st WAY BIKEWAY 140th Avenue SE 176th 0.41 Street BIKE LANES SE Street SE MAY VALLEY ROAD Coal Creek Issaquah- 2.4 Rural arterial,no SHARED USE BIKEWAY Parkway Hobart sidewalks ROADWAY Road/SR 900 SE PETROVITSKY ROAD Tukwila/Green Petrovitsky 6 Principal arterial with BIKE LANES Busy,narrow street. BIKE LANES(South 43rd River Trail and Park some sidewalks,short ROW looks to be nearly Street/179th Street/SE Interurban Trail separated multi-use fully utilized.Some ex. Carr Road/SE 176th trail segment near eparated trail at Street) Ridgewood Elem. Ridgewood Elem. SEATTLE WATERLINE Cedar River/ 161 st/131st 1 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI.Utilizes utility corridor SPUR Riverview Park Ave NE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL, ROUGH SURFACE SEATTLE WATERLINE Downtown/I- Lake Youngs 3.75 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI.Utilizes utility corridor, TRAIL 405 at Cedar Watershed trail,rough surface USE TRAIL, w.spur to Cascade Park Ave.South ROUGH SURFACE SHATTUCK AVENUE Houser Way South 2nd 0.34 Collector street with BIKE LANES SOUTH BIKE LANES South Street sidewalks SOOS CREEK TRAIL Cedar River Trail Soos Creek 4.5 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI.Some existing segments; Park(Kent)at trail,rough surface USE TRAIL,PAVED some segments being SE 208th developed by King Street • County Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES SECTION CROSS SECTION in Miles SOUTH 2nd AND 3rd Rainier Avenue Main Avenue 1 Principal arterial,one-SHARED USE Check to see if bike lanes STREET BIKEWAY South South way,with sidewalks ROADWAY can be accommodated thru narrowing of lanes SOUTH 3rd PLACE BIKE Rainier Ave. Shattuck Ave. 0.25 Local street LANES South South SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Black River SW 43rd 2.85 Separated multi-use COMPLETE 2 segments to be _ Trail/Monster Street trail,paved MISSING LINKS completed Road TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SW 7th Street Renton City 3.25 Collector,bike lanes EXTEND BIKE Bike lane/trail under I- Limits north of SW 43rd LANES 405 could be included w. (southwest) Street. Some 1-405 redevelopment TAYLOR AVENUE NW& Northern city SW 7th St 1.4 Shared use roadway/ NO CHANGE HARDIE AVENUE SW limits(toward designated bike BIKEWAY Rainier Avenue route(Collector, South) except Hardie from Renton Ave S to Langston Rd 5) THUNDER HILLS CREEK 1-405 Puget Drive 0.9 Separated multi-use SEPARATED MULTI.Could be included w.(- TRAIL SE trail,rough surface USE TRAIL, 405 redevelopment ROUGH SURFACE TUKWILA STATION/ Monster Road Tukwila Principal arterial+ SEPARATED MULTI. LONGACRES WAY SW Station collector USE TRAIL,PAVED CONNECTOR(South +BIKE LANES Grady Way and Longacres Way SW) TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Black River Naches 0.9 Soft-surface trail, SEPARATED MULTI.Trail parallels railroad BLACK RIVER TRAIL Riparian Forest Avenue SW rough USE trail ROW Trailhead/ Monster Road TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Fort Dent Park Monster 0.25 Soft-surface trail, SEPARATED MULTI Union Pacific Railroad FORT DENT TRAIL Road SW rough,under railroad USE trail,PAVED ROW between CONNECTOR trestle Tukwila/Ft.Dent Park/Interurban Trail and Renton. Path follow Black River to its confluence with Green River TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Shattuck Burnett 0.3 Local street without SHARED USE HOUSER WAY SOUTH Avenue South Avenue sidewalks ROADWAY South TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Burnett Avenue Main Avenue 0.3 Local street+RR SEPARATED MULTI.New cross-section to HOUSER WAY SOUTH South South tracks and sidewalks USE trail allow RR use between (RAILROAD ROW) Burnett and Main(long term?) TWO RIVERS TRAIL: Black River SW 7th St 0.2 Local street SEPARATED MULTI. NACHES AVENUE SW Riparian Forest USE trail Trailhead TWO RIVERS TRAIL: SW 7th Street Houser Way 0.17 Collector with some SEPARATED MULTI.Reconfigure on-street SHATTUCK AVENUE South sidewalks, USE trail,PAVED parking to SOUTH perpendicular accommodate bikes parking on west side TWO RIVERS TRAIL:SW Oakesdale Burnett 1.3 Minor arterial with SEPARATED MULTI Add bikes lanes through 7th STREET Avenue sidewalks USE trail,PAVED "road diet"to create SEPARATED trail? UNION AVENUE NE SE 95th Way Dead end 2.1 Minor arterial with ADD BIKE LANES (132nd Avenue NE) (about SE 4th sidewalks • Street) WILLIAMS&WELLS South Grady North 6th St 1 Minor arterial,one- SHARED USE Reconfigure crossing at AVENUE BIKEWAY Way way,with sidewalks ROADWAY 6th to allow bike passage Approx CURRENT CROSS- PROP.TYPICAL TRAIL/ROUTE NAME FROM TO Length NOTES in Miles SECTION CROSS SECTION EXISTING FACILITIES,in alphabetical order BLACK RIVER TRAIL Black River Springbrook Separated pedestrian NO CHANGE trail alongside Riparian Forest Trail trail,soft-surface water/heron rookery Trailhead/ Monster Road CEDAR RIVER TRAIL Lake City Limits 4.5 Paved regional trail PAVED REGIONAL Ped.only: 6th to Lake Washington (east) TRAIL-NO Washington(.6 mi) CHANGE DEVIL'S ELBOW TRAIL Edmonds Duvall 1.7 Abandoned local SEPARATED MULTI.Repave(?)and add safety Avenue NE Avenue street,with sidewalks USE TRAIL,PAVED improvements to NE/Coal +BIKE LANES abandoned road Creek Parkway INTERURBAN TRAIL Sumner Tukwila 10 Paved regional trail NO CHANGE LAKE WASHINGTON North 8th Street Park Avenue 0.5 Shared use NO CHANGE LOOP:HOUSER WAY North roadway/designated NORTH bike route(Minor Arterial) MONSTER ROAD SW Oakesdale SW 16th 0.7 Collector street with NO CHANGE Avenue Street bike lanes and some SW/Black River sidewalks Trail Head PACCAR Trail: GARDEN North 6th Street Houser Way 0.5 Separated multi-use WIDEN TO MEET Propose name change to AVENUE NORTH& North trail on east and STANDARDS,if distinguish from other NORTH 8th south side on minor possible section of Garden- arterial with PACCAR trail. Need to sidewalks determine how much more width is needed. RENTON SENIOR Logan Avenue Williams 0.15 Separated multi-use NO CHANGE Confirm ability to share CENTER North Avenue path,paved path alongside Sr.Center North (combine bikes and ped) SW 16th STREET Longacres Drive Oakesdale 0.35 Collector street with NO CHANGE Extend to Lind or E. ("Longacres Bikeway") Avenue SW sidewalks and bike Valley Road lanes Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Open House #1: Comment Summary August 6,2007 Most frequently heard comments: • Connect the regional trails: Interurban, Green River, Cedar River, Lake Washington Loop Critical connections: Interurban via Fort Dent Park Lake Washington Loop via south/Coulon Park • Establish a safe and convenient east-west route through downtown • Create safe routes to neighborhoods, especially the Highlands • Improve wayfinding signage, especially through downtown • Foster more awareness of bicycle through 'Watch for Cyclists"and other signage • Improve and maintain facilities with bikes in mind: detector loops that detect bikes, good roadway maintenance,storm drain covers and railroad crossings that are safe for bikes • Modify critical intersection to increase safety and convenience for bikes General comments: • Provide continuous roadway sweeping and regular maintenance on designated bike routes • Redesign storm drain covers such that they don't conflict with or catch bike tires • Provide bike parking and wayfinding signage downtown • Look for routes that are inexpensive to develop Bike routes/connections/improvements recommended: • safe route to Renton Highlands, Sunset, Harrington, Renton Technical College • Kennydale to Green River Trail • Post office on NE 4th'between Union and Duvall difficult to access by bike or foot • South Renton to Lake Washington Loop/Gene Coulon Park - • SW 7th as east-west route through downtown • Williams/Wells as north-south routes through downtown • East-west- route along railroad right of way • 1-5 crossing at S. 129th • 1-405 crossings at Renton Hill, Kennydale (N. 30th/Kennewick Place) . • Houser Way N between 4th and downtown—convert to 2 way • bike route from Hwy 99 into the valley—Renton and Kent • Edmonds as north-south route through Highlands • Duvall to Coal Creek Parkway • SE May Valley Road • South 196th, with new overpass, as east-west route across valley between Kent and Renton • 100th, 116th, and 132nd Avenues SE as north-south routes from Renton to Kent Difficult intersections: key: NB=northbound, SB=southbound, EB=eastbound, WB=westbound • N. Park Drive and Lake Washington Blvd N. • Rainier Ave S, SB turn to Airport Road—difficult left turn • Coal Creek Pkwy&SE May Valley Rod—bridge is a choke point • SW 7th&Lind—roundabout suggested—NB cars often don't stop at sign • 8th&Garden MACLE OD•RE CKORD Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 9,12,'2008 • Logan &6th—bikes not detected by detector loops • SW 7th&Oakesdale—bikes not detected by detector loops • Airport& Logan—bikes not detected by detector loops • 6th&Williams—WB bikes unable to turn left SB onto Williams • Williams&Grady Way—bikes not detected by detector loops • N. 8th St& House Way N—bikes not detected by detector loops • May Creek bridge—choke point for traffic as road narrows to cross creek • Need a safe place to cross Rainier Avenue _ Problem areas: • Sight distance up route to Renton Hill is poor • Philip Arnold Park cut-through needs improvement • Puget Drive SE east of Jones PI SE/Rolling Hills Dr--shoulder is overgrown • Houser Way& Park Dr N. Siqnaqe • 'Watch for Cyclists"sign for motorists on critical routes • Wayfinding signage into and out of downtown Renton Opportunities • Consider trail over top of utility duct on SW 7th • Rest stop along Lake Washington Loop at 30th Street Pedestrian/walkway requests: • Need for a safe crossing of Sunset to Hazen High School • Ensure good connections/pathways in and out of The Landing • Create safe pathways around Highland Elementary and along Harrington to the Harrington Square • Don't develop undeveloped rights-of-way in the Highlands area • Add pedestrians scale lighting—esp. In the Highlands,for safety • May Creek Trail—provide better access to lower May creek trail paralleling 1-405 via overpass/underpass MACLE OD•RE CKORD Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 9112:'2008 what we've heard SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO DATE most frequently heard • Connect the regional trails:Interurban,Green River,Cedar River,Lake Washington Loop • Critical connections:Interurban via Fort Dent Park,Lake Washington Loop via south/Coulon Park • Establish a safe and convenient east-west route through downtown • Create safe routes to neighborhoods,especially the Highlands • Improve wayfinding signage,especially through downtown • Foster more awareness of bicycle.through"Watch for Cyclists"and other signage • Improve and maintain facilities with bikes in mind:detector loops that detect bikes, good roadway maintenance,storm drain covers and railroad crossings that are safe for - bikes • Modify critical intersection to increase safety and convenience for bikes general • Provide continuous roadway sweeping and regular maintenance on designated bike routes • Redesign storm drain covers such that they don't conflict with or catch bike tires • Provide bike parking and wayfinding signage downtown • Look for routes that are inexpensive to develop recommended • Safe route to Renton Highlands,Sunset,Harrington,Renton Technical College • Kennydale to Green River Trail routes & improvements • Post office on NE 4th,between Union and Duvall difficult to access by bike or foot • South Renton to Lake Washington Loop/Gene Coulon Park • SW 7th as east-west route through downtown • Williams/Wells as north-south routes through downtown • East-west-route along railroad right of way • 1-5 crossing at 5.129th • 1-405 crossings at Renton Hill,Kennydale(N.30th/Kennewick Place) • 1-405 improvements should include route from NE 44th St.interchange,parallel to free- way,to May Creek Trail • Houser Way N between 4th and downtown-convert to 2 way • Bike route from Hwy 99 into the valley-Renton and Kent • Edmonds as north-south route through Highlands • Duvall to Coal Creek Parkway • SE May Valley Road • Newcastle to May Creek to Windtree subdivision • Honey Creek Trail to May Creek Trail • South 196th,with new overpass,as east-west route across valley between Kent and Renton • 100th,116th,and 132nd Avenues SE as north-south routes from Renton to Kent • Problem interesections noted on Route Options maps signage • "Watch for Cyclists"sign for motorists on critical routes • Wayfinding signage into and out of downtown Renton opportunities • Consider trail over top of utility duct on SW 7th • Rest stop along Lake Washington Loop at 30th Street pedestrian/walkway • Need fora safe crossing of Sunset to Hazen High School ! • Ensure good connections/pathways in and out of The Landing • Create safe pathways around Highland Elementary and along Harrington to the Har- requests rington Square • Don't develop undeveloped rights-of-way in the Highlands area • Add pedestrians scale lighting-esp.In the Highlands,for safety • • Provide lighting on a very public(visible)trail system(Landing,McKnight JR High) • May Creek Trail-provide better access to lower May creek trail paralleling 1-405 via overpass/underpass • Provide benches along Lake Washington Blvd Trail(bump-out at 30th St) • Provide additional soft surface trail(adjacent to Cedar River Trail specifically noted) Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan M AC L E Summaryof Public Comments D• R E CKORD what we've heard SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO DATE • Importance of connections between regional trails stressed overall • Positive Feedback on many routes:SW 7th,BNSF rail corridor,Panther Creek wetlands, Garden south of North 6th Street,Soos Creek and May Creek corridors,power line corri- dors • More detailed route recommendations • More input from South Renton and Earlington • Identification of many problems spots and shorter connection ideas,esp.to schools and important destinations • Need trail and access from Renton Avenue South to Cedar River. general • Need north/south route between Renton and Kent;maybe along Benson Drive SE/108th Avenue SE recommendations • Need an east/west route across southern Renton—it's basically an island—no good bikeway in or out. • Incorporate increased street sweeping into policy. • Identify discontinuous routes like Benson Road. • Renton Hill Association—neighborhood matching funds to do trail. Contact 255-0290. recommended . Pedestrian path along SW Langston to Sunset to 68th Avenue South • Fort Dent connector should be a high priority. routes & improvements • Continue Soos Creek Trail up to waterline ROW. • Smithers from 7th to high school is a good route. • Rainier Avenue South—difficult transition southbound at city limits.Northbound not as bad,but trail continuity could be better. • SW 7th is good path choice. • RR ROW from Monster Road to downtown is good path choice. • Need trail from NE 3rd Street through Liberty Park to Maple Valley Highway. • Need path to Hazen High School from Union Avenue NE along NE 10th Place. • Continue Duvall Avenue NE path to SE 136th Street. • South 4th Street from Shattuck to Burnett good path choice. • Continue garden south from North 6th to North 2nd Street,east to Factory Avenue North • Improve signage along Jones Road for traffic safety,make bike lane and sidewalk. • Panther Creek wetland path—good idea. • Improve Burlington Northern access from Monster Road to Green River Trail. • Use water/power line easement for path along South 132nd Street between MLK Jr.Way South and Renton Avenue South • Connect May Creek Trail to Newcastle trail. • Use BNSF corridor for mass transit(rail)/bike&trail • Earlington Park path along power line,water line at 134th,—bike trail from P&R diago- , nally to NW or multi-use in City Light corridor. •Talbot Road South—need northbound transition on approach to South 43rd. problem spots • Talbot from City Hall to Puget Drive South is dangerous. • Sidewalks force bikes into traffic at corners SE 168th between 116th SE and 128th. • Need a northbound transition zone on Talbot Road at South 43rd. • Sidewalk alternate is bad to riding in traffic at South 43rd between 167 and Talbot Road South • Pedestrian push button not responsive at North Airport Way • Sunset at 38th;need left turn(north bound)bike lane • Need left turn bike lane Duvall to NE 4th Street • Need left turn bike lane;southbound Duvall to 128th • Difficult crossings: -South 3rd Street&Taylor -South 3rd Place&Rainier Avenue S -Logan&North Airport Way Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan M AC L E OD• RE Summary of Public Comments, Open House #2 CKORD 2003 Draft Trails Plan Routes & Status ROUTE Type of LENGTH - SUR- 2008 NOTES Facility FACING STATUS _ 1 Black River Trail Multi-use 1.53 Paved & SS 2 Burnett Trail SW & BL 1.3 3 Cascade Trail (waterline) Multi-use 3.2 Paved&SS 4 Cedar River Trail Multi-use 4.5 EXISTING Ped only north of 6th St 5 Devil's Elbow Trail Multi-use 1.7 6 Duvall Trail SW & BL 2.6 EXISTING 7 Fairwood Trail (140th Ave SE) SW & BL 3 EXISTING 8 Honey Creek Trail Ped. only 0.95 Soft-surface 9 Lake Washington Trail Multi-use 2.7 EXISTING 10 Lake Youngs Trail Multi-use 2.7 Soft-surface 11 May Creek Trail Ped. only 2.5 Soft-surface 12 NE3rd/NE 4th Trail SW & BL 2.8 13 Oakesdale Trail SW & BL 1.7 EXISTING bike lane ends at 27th 14 Panther Creek Trail Ped. only Petrovitsky Trail (SE 43rd/SE 15 Carr Rd/SE 176th St) SW & BL 4.8 Extend from Blvd Park 16 Soos Creek Trail Ped. only 2.28 Paved EXISTING to SE Petrovitsky Rd 17 Springbrook Trail Multi-use 2.86 Paved EXISTING Two missing segments 18 Sunset Trail SW & BL 3.2 Paved 19 SW 7th Trail SW & BL 1.3 20 Talbot Trail SW & BL 2.4 21 Thunder Creek Trail Ped. only Soft-surface 22 Union Trail (132nd Ave SE) SW & BL 2.09 23 SW 16th Street Trail SW & BL EXISTING 24 Interurban Trail Multi-use 10 EXISTING Regional trail 25 Monster Road Trail BL EXISTING 26 Fort Dent Connector Multi-use 0.25 27 Sam Chastain Memorial Trail Ped. only 0.71 28 Cedar Sammamish Trail Multi-use 10-20 29 Seattle Waterline Trail Ped. only 2.5 Soft-surface 30 Puget Drive Trail SW & BL 0.85 31 Benson Trail SW & BL i . , (j`: ;, _i 1.:f x 1 BELLEVUE 1 , , CITY OF RENTON F PARKS, SCHOOLS F`1� ' j '` �` `` :Pt�A AND TRAILS Ran IL: terry e =� DEVELOPED PARKS EL' ( I IL alI OPEN SPACES ;ev= ` 1 PEDESTRIAN ONLY TRAILS `' , MIXED USE TRAIL �/ t�\ f BIKE ROUTE(SHARED ROADWAY) r, SCHOOLS 1 L_ LAKE 130RP.N I CITY LIMITS �� N E W CA S * TRAIL ACCESS POINT f ti O, Technical Services ,. ) ♦ �.` ♦ Planning/Building/Public Works \+ \ x c •` R.MacOnie,D.Visneski Y'. a January 2008 g \ \ R x M„ : til �;,,, j ' 1 °\ n \, �.>N I" R fw sC4 . $1 ,:)M ye 1� 1 ay .j 9,,,r1,PV �� •1 frm- tr-- -- LAKE WASHINGTON 1 l j , t(-I•� r" I '' `'of 5 -__ r-- „ § `l , , 1 ,. -,• ire �. r , N''''-\ • 1 � \ ( - s uE:_ ,r1 01,od.... "�_# 1 .. I' (-I 1 } I} {i° ` � 1 I F r, ‘11_,,,‘",,,,--:',,,F,rs.,::::;:i.74, ',,,11/,---„--t...-,..:',',-, 3\N[ll # Int:�,q, v ( , ) 1 7., 1 s ,, 1 i u Li i P I III it' , 1 i py trt �s 1 .. .. x .' .1 .� I'1 --- - r 1�n a - a i T lax r _--.---'--� - t T -/ ° +� u @ SIE � ' } `ll nax111 {'L� 1isat In�i r N pr - _- L E tlli I N1) Y y ��, :.- Y - . - •\\ .. I/ 3 Ixf '�� / f + t._ y ' oE. It nS' _ l�I I lir. it, , �1.----- i ice" � v i1 CII a i\x / 141. ww C 9 1 a ■ 1 �n Jo < 1 i. 14/r \ s ,,,,,/i ilkiiir : . 1 x _ x__,!.„, nx x x. t 0 i ,. ...„. ., . , , ,, , , - ., \ ,„ . , ,,,, ,,,,,...„. Tc ,,L„, 'NA _„. „,,. ,, r" VllVt: ,c / wimpipri -4' IIIIIMUNIMI.: (- ./ ..,,-::-..t , : ,‘, „ ,, .,..„, - 1 4-.; ®D\ ri,\..,' \c-'i . r . t , illif ,, 1 ( a1 y- ' I III 4. 1 I I I , T 1 t tt ( -..,,/;..,.:-; • I �w�al ... VAI ;� )1(....) Iv n s ^x.TneI - 1 j( 1 �t \ �T Ht L [ 1 J I :,;.,%,..,.. tyaf•• 1__ - ',. \r..�//�4 I_ {I�r.c.;W Elr �,F [`J _ I \\� '� x 1-e3ln al _ 3 ,'L ^ _ _'a6M i i J x:. 1 e s Y 3 F - I I Y .. y ,h cn I �a v,:•• a k ,' _ Al x y _ . rr� z ,M:I L_�T T i ff `1_ 1 ns`�1 ( �� e r. / 1=11 i 7 ( ��1 T 1 y�Milt - - l'r lwnn r L. SAII, , . , l __ KE T 14,, - ry r M 1 _ I ” y., < ,7 : 71 ' 's PANTHER LAKE I LWO . .K - - - t t L v• L� __— ! � - -- I.. I I \ - ♦. e - - I 1.1 •.. ` t r \ �$ . 1 I i '`i _ \ -- -' 17:71;1'71 -----s-- ';-:- -> 4,,•�, `"4• f ' wr 1 • ! �1 gift r 1 , 4r ti Li i �, --e=, .---m--., -___-_- r 14 II 1,-. ' ,'. 1 :...• • . , t .DS7. O ' . 2030 Wdk ate ,; I. ;'l �/I s r'' „- n,W '.1I Appendix 9: Projects •,; I..( . v II,) ,-, ,i , i* —..h _,,,.. ,- J Puget Sound Regional Council PSRC July 24th,2008 4 STI JP:TION 1 C 1 U date met;ropolitan'transportati.on plan for the central p'u,gtet sound. re'g;io4T Appendix 9: Projects pp I July 24, 2008 Puget Sound Regional Council 1011 Western Avenue,Suite 500 Seattle,Washington 98104-1035 206-464-7090/FAX 206-587-4825/psrc.org I � _ _ "Strategic" Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically title - � - • Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Nornmotorized ...for sponsor: King County/Metro Tolt Pipeline Trail 4044 King County Sammamish 104th Avenue Design and construct an $1,500.000 Candidate 2010 Regional Trail(Sep.) (West) River Trail(near NE approach to Tolt Pipeline Other-Nonmotorized W.Riverside Trail Drive) Two Rivers Trail 4030 King County Cedar River Junction of Acquisition,design, $1,250,000 Candidate 2010 Regional Trail(Sep.) Trail(Renton) Green River and permitting,and Other-Nonmotorized Interurban Trails construction of paved (Tukwila) regional trail link between the Cedar River Trail and the Green River and Interurban Trails W Lake 3288 King County Bellevue city Issaquah city Class 2 bike lanes $2,101,239 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes Sammamish limits limits Pkwy Bike Lanes Eastside BNSF 4011 King County Woodinville rail NE 124th St.in Paved bike path to $1,568,422 Candidate 2015 Regional Trail(Sep.) Trail(Segment D junction@rail Redmond AASHTO standards from Redmond spur corning connecting main BNSF CL to Woodinville) from Redmond Corridor Trail to segment at Woodinville- within Redmond CL. Redmond Road/SR202 Eastside BNSF 2919 King County NE 124th St E Lake Shared use bike path $3,105,164 Candidate 2010 Regional Trail(Sep.) Trail(Segment D Sammamish within Redmond Bike Trail @ SR aka Willows Rd 520 Bike Path) Eastside BNSF 4161 Snohomish County Woodinville rail City of Study and possibly $4,000,000 Candidate 2020 Trail(Segment C, junction@rail Snohomish implement acquisition, Woodinville to spur coming design,and construction Snohomish) from Redmond of a paved and soft- at Woodinville- surface regional trail. Rail Redmond freight to continue from Road/SR202 Woodinville to BNSF main Stevens pass East-West line while trail is under consideration. Eastside BNSF 4041 King County Woodinville rail BNSF Acquisition,design,and $4,000,000 Candidate 2020 Regional Trail(Sep.) Trail(Segment B, junction@rail track@just construction of a paved Other-Nonmotorized N.Bellevue to spur coming northwest of the and soft-surface regional Woodinville) from Redmond SR520 and i- trail at Woodinville- 405 interchange Redmond in north Bellevue Road/SR202 • 7/24/2008 *Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry, Nonmotorized,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will be listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 39 of 165 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides thc'primary'county under which the project is listed arc shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic"Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Non-motorized ...for sponsor: King County/Metro Eastside BNSF 4040 King County BNSF North end of Acquisition,design,and $4,000,000 Candidate 2020 Regional Trail(Sep.) Trail(Segment A, track@just Coulon Park in construction of a paved Renton to N. northwest of the Renton and soft-surface regional Other-Nonmotorized Bellevue) SR520 and I- trail 405 interchange in north Bellevue Projects of type*: Roadway Related ...for sponsor: King County/Metro 100th Ave NE 401 King County NE 145th St NE 139th St Widen roadway to 5 lanes. $4,151,000 Candidate 2022 BOTH-11 ITS Bike Lanes Sidewalk Major Widening-GP 132nd Ave SE 413 King County SE 208 St SE 224 St Widen Roadway- $10,044,000 Candidate 2022 Improvement-Road assumed estimate 3 total Bike Lanes lanes Sidewalk Major Widening-GP 132nd Ave SE 414 King County • SE 224 St SE 242 St Widen Roadway- $11,567,000 Candidate 2022 ITS assumed estimate 3 total Bike Lanes lanes Sidewalk Major Widening-GP 132nd/140th Ave 237 King County SR 169 SR 516 Design and Construct $600,000 Exempt 2011 ITS SE Fiber optic cable connections,connecting CCTV Cameras,new signal controllers/ cabinets and ITS equipment along the corridor. This project will connect into the Trans Valley ITS project with the King County Traffic Contol Center 7/24/2008 *Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry, Nonmotorized,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type hut will he listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 40 of l65 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed arc shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic" Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Roadway Related ...for sponsor: Redmond REDMOND- 830 King County 160TH AVE NE NE 124th ST Widen Red-Wood Rd from $19,423,616 Candidate 2015 Improvement-Road WOODINVILLE intersection with new RD 160th Ave NE Extension Bike Lanes near the Puget Power trail Sidewalk north to NE 124th St. Major Widening-GP Improvements include 1 through lane in each direction,left turn and extended right turn lanes if appropriate,access management,bike lanes, curb,gutter,sidewalks, street lights,storm drainage,underground power and right-of-way acquisition. Redmond -and WSDOT will - coordinate a planning process to finalize final design for segment between 116th and 124th; the latter might not be widened. See also WSDOT project 1755. West Lake 3665 King County NE 51st St Bel-Red Rd Widen West Lake $11.463,424 Candidate 2030 Major Widening-GP Sammamish Sammamish Pkwy from Bike Lanes Parkway NE 51st St to Bel-Red Widening Rd. Improvements Sidewalk include 2 through lane in Improvement-Road each direction,left turn lanes,bike lanes,curb, gutter,sidewalks,street lights,storm drainage, underground power and right-of-way. Lead Sponsor: Renton Projects of type*: Non-motorized ...for sponsor: Renton Burnett St 3296 King County 7th Ave S Cedar River Class 2 bike lanes $500,000 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes Promenade Bike Lanes Cedar River Trail 2671 King County Terminus of Rainier and 88th Shared use bike path $250,000 Candidate 2010 Regional Trail(Sep.) existing Cedar Not in local plans River Trail 7/24/2008 'Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry,Nonmotorizcd,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will be listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 79 of 165 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed arc shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic"Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Non-motorized ...for sponsor: Renton Houser Way Bike 3175 King County Smithers Ave S N 8th St Class 2 bike lanes $904,700 Exempt 2015 Bike Lanes Lanes Lake Washington 3243 King County N Airport Way King Co/Renton Class 2 bike lanes. Lake $496,126 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes Trail line Washington Trail. Lind Avenue SW 2752 King County SW 7th Grady Class 2 Not in local $380,000 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes plans NE 3rd St/NE 4th 2716 King County Sunset Union Avenue Class 2 Not in local $1,568,422 Exempt 2025 Bike Lanes St Boulevard plans NE 4th Street 3259 King County Union Ave NE Renton eastern Class 2 bike lanes $1,568,422 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes Bike Lanes city limits NE Sunset Blvd 3219 King County 1-405 Duvall Ave NE Class 2 bike lanes $1,342,458 Exempt 2020 Bike Lanes Bike Bypass Springbrook/lnter 2856 King County Oakesdale Ave SR 181 Shared use bike path $2,000,000 Candidate 2010 Regional Trail(Sep.) urban Connection SW (SW 27th St) SW 7th Bike 3279 King County SR 515 Tukwila city Bike lanes Not in local $933,884 Exempt 2010 Bike Lanes Lanes limits plans Projects of type*: Roadway Related ...for sponsor: Renton Airport Way/ 377 King County SR 900 Logan Ave N Provide queue bypasses $3,000,000 Exempt 2010 ITS Rainier Ave S and signal priority systems on Airport Way and Rainier Avenue between SR900 and Logan Avenue N. Duvall Ave NE 2326 King County NE 4th St NE 25th Ct Widen to 5 lanes,CGS $11,000,000 Candidate 2010 REN-17 Improvement-Road (Renton City (curb,gutter,and Bike Lanes Limit) sidewalk),add Class II bike lanes,add amenities, Sidewalk channelization. Major Widening-GP 7/24/2008 *Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry,Nonmotorized,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will be listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 80 of 165 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed arc shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic" Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Roadway Related ...for sponsor: Renton GRADY WAY 869 King County SR 167 SR 515 Re-channelize and modify $1,000,000 Exempt 2010 Multiple Intersects signals for a continuous ITS eastbound lane. Logan Ave N/N 2347 King County S 3rd St Park Dr HOV improvements, $6,070,245 Candidate 2020 Major Widening-HOV 6th St sidewalks Sidewalk Oakesdale Ave 2328 King County Monster Rd SR 900 Replace Monster Rd $20,700,000 Candidate 2020 Improvement-Road SW Bridge;widen to 415 lanes Bike Lanes +Bike Lanes+CGS Sidewalk Major Widening-GP New/Widen Bridge Park Dr-Sunset 2341 King County Garden Ave Duvall Ave NE HOV lane(Garden Ave to $3,223,230 Candidate 2020 Major Widening-HOV Blvd 1-405).Construct HOV . operational improvements. Park/Sunset 307 King County East City Limits Garden Ave N Traffic signal $8,000,000 Exempt 2010 ITS Corridor improvements on Park Drive to the east and west of 1-405 and throughout the Sunset Blvd. SR-900 ' corridor from NE Park Drive to the east city limits. South Lake 4012 King County N.6th Street Park Drive North Extending Logan Ave $24,000,000 Candidate 2007 New Facility-Road Washington North from N 6th street to Roadway the existing intersection at Major Widening-GP Improvements Garden Ave North and Relocation-Road Lake Washington Multiple Intersects Boulevard N.N 8th street from New Logan Ave North to existing Park Ave N,N 10th street from New Logan Ave North to existing Garden Ave N; and realignment and widening of existing Park Ave N from N 8th Street to New Logan Ave N. SR 169 Widening 1607 King County SE Jones Road 1-405 NFS-widen to 6 lanes $17,288,524 Candidate 2010 PB-4 Major Widening-HOV 1-405 to Renton from SE Jones Road to I- REN-18 Sidewalk CL 405,HOV lanes. Transit WDNW-430 ITS queue jump @ NB 1-405 ramp,Aggressive access management. 7/24/2008 *Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Perry, Nonmotorized,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will he listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 81 or 165 0 Additional counties into which the project frills besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed are shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic" Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcome(s) Projects of type*: Roadway Related ...for sponsor: Renton SR 515 1307 King County 1-405 South City Limits Construct queue jumps, $4,000,000 Exempt 2010 Multiple Intersects by-pass lanes,and transit ITS priority signal improvements on SR-515 or Benson Road from new general purpose direct access interchange at SR- 515 or Benson Road to the South City limits. SR 900 2327 King County S 2nd Wy Sunset Blvd Widen roadway and $12,724,167 Candidate 2020 New/Widen Bridge bridge between Mill Av and Park Av to 5 lanes. Major Widening-GP SW 27th St/ 4163 King County Strander Design and construction $14,000,000 Exempt 2008 Other-Special Strander Blvd Ph Blvd@BNSF RR of the BNSF railroad track 1 Segment 2a - relocation(approximatelly - 5,800 feet)to allow one structure to be built over the tracks.One structure is the only feasible option-without it,the western bridge approach is impossible.Includes Wetland mitigation,design for track relocation and track embankment. SW 27th St I 4164 King County SW 27th St Strander Blvd Design and construction $26,000,000 Candidate 2010 Grade a Separation Strander Blvd Ph of the bridge structure, 1 Segment 2b that will provide a grade separation between rail and vehicles at the Strander/27th St./BNSF RR crossing. SW 27th 4165 King County Oaksdale Ave East Valley Rd Extend SW 27th St as a $5,500,000 Candidate 2011 New Facility-Road St/Strander Blvd SW five lane arterial between Ph 2 East Valley Hwy and Major Widening-HOV Oaksdale Ave SW, including transit queue jumps at Lind. Construct HOV lanes on SW 27 St and new HOV-only interchange SR 167&27th SW. ST FINANCIAL PARTNER CAPPED AT $4M. 7/24/2008 'Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry, Nonmotorizcd,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will he listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 82 of 165 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed are shown in parentheses below the project title. "Strategic" Projects in Destination 2030 sorted first by Sponsor then by Type then by Sponsor Sort(if any)then alphabetically by title Proj Title D 2030 ID In County From or at To Description Est.Cost(y2006$) Status Complete TIP Proj(s). Outcomes) Projects of type*: Transit Related ...for sponsor: Renton Central Renton 1308 King County Grady Way Park Avenue Modify existing arterials $22,585,271 Candidate 2015 Multiple Intersects Transit Corridor North (Hardie Avenue SW,SW New/Reloc.Transit ROW Sunset Boulevard/S.3rd Street,and Rainier ITS Avenue South)to provide a north-south transit corridor through downtown Renton. This project includes making geometric improvements, building new Business Access and Transit(BAT) lanes,sidewalks, medians,queue jumps, and by-pass lanes, installing a transit signal priority system,and possible reconstruction of BNSF Railroad bridge spanning Hardie Avenue SW. Sound Transit is a financial partner with their contribution capped at $14.9M for this project. NE 3rd St/NE 2344 King County Sunset Blvd Vesta Ave NE Transit Improvements, $23,003,517 Exempt 2025 Improvement-Road 4th St including channelization ITS and signal modifications New P&R Lot- 2342 King County SR 900 Duvall(138th Construct new lot. $4,000,000 Candidate 2020 P&R(new/expand) Renton East Ave SE) Highlands Renton Urban 298 King County [Not submitted] Transit shuttle service $7,004,129 Approved 2020 Service Shuttle Local Cir trips within the City of Expansion/Reconfigurati. Renton. Interconnects n-Transit activity centers,major employers,regional transit routes and park and ride facilities. Cost represents 20 years total costs of operations. Signal Priority 303 King County [Not submitted] It installs city-wide transit $2,334,710 Exempt 2010 ITS Program priority signal system improvements. 7/24/201)8 *Types: Roadway-Related,Transit-Related,Ferry, Nonmotorized,Other. Projects may fit in more than one type but will he listed only once in a'primary'type. Page 83 of 165 0 Additional counties into which the project falls besides the'primary'county under which the project is listed arc shown in parentheses below the project title. r INTERSTATE Frequently Asked Questions 405 Corridor Program Congestion Relief& Bus Rapid Transit Projects Ito Bike & Pedestrian Improvements The 1-405 corridor multi-modal strategy includes improvements beyond © ee) Legend commuter-focused accommodations. qii The 1-405 Congestion Relief and —Paved Trail Bus Rapid Transit Projects improve ® Soft Surface Trail pedestrian and bicycle connectivity New/Additional Bike&Pedestrian throughout the corridor by providing VN�H COUNTY 405 Improvements safe highway crossings, and K'""°"" ——— — A SR524(FilbertRd) yr r.24 Crossing 1-405 from North Rd to Locust Wy— neighborhood trail linkages. These d„ Gilman NO add sidewalk/paved shoulder include five improved crossings in / _el_e' aror,.i B Damson Rd 1611 Bothell and Snohomish County, one la Pipeline Crossing l-405 from 192ndStSWto Rrr� NE I60th 5E Logan Rd-add sidewalk/paved shoulder in Bellevue, and two in Renton. Ten C SR521 missing connections between existing NC"a'°s. Crossing l-405 from 220thStSEto 228th St SE-add pedestrian/bike facility trails will help to create regional NE128thSt D North Creek Trail Link pedestrian/bicycle routes, including "E 12N^St240th to 232nd-add pedestrian/bike trail NI 116th SE, completion of non-motorized systems E Fitzgerald Rd/21thAve 4 Crossing 1-405 from 228th St SE to in Renton and Tukwila, improved use 240th St SE-add pedestrian/bike facility of railroad right-of-way in Kirkland, and F Connection between Sammamish River Neearr,St. Trail and North Creek Trail providing key trail linkages in Bothell. BetwenSR522 and NE195thSt— NE"""s add pedestrian/bike overcrossing of 1-405 The map to the right shows the existing ® ailme") G SE8thto Totem Lake Add pedestrian/bike facility trail system along the 1-405 corridor. �s The lettered bike/ped symbols indicate I-405toSE60th-add pedestrian/bike facilities NE 121h SG H Lake new or additional bicycle and pedestrian I Lake WABlvd/112thAveSEWABlvd Crossing 1-405 from 106th Ave SE to improvements as outlined in the NE&h9. 112thPISE-add sidewalks 1-405 Corridor Environmental Impact "" 1 Lake WABlvd/112th Statement (EIS) and Master Plan. The ` `r addpedeE 60th oMaycreekcilityhange- add pedestrian/bike facility "Nickel" projects in Kirkland, Bellevue, St �� I( NE Park Dr and Renton are the firstphaseof Crossingl-405from SR900/SunsetBlvd- 90` add sidewalk/paved shoulder the Master Plan. The Nickel Funding L Cedar River Trail S Extension Package for three projects on 1-405 Goal Creek Rsw sr 1-4osto Burnett Ave-add pedestrian/ bike facilities provides for improved bike/pedestrian M Cedar River Trail/Lake WA Blvd Connector features within the nickel project ,i n"^"S' Cedar River Trail to Lake WA Blvd Loop- ® add pedestrian/bike facilities designs. Additional bike/pedestrian N I-405/SR 167 Trail Connection improvements, as shown here, are ws,-�,- Lind Ave SE to TalbotRdS-addhailconnection planned in future phases of the project, ,/405 0 Jackson SW/Longacres Dr SW Crossing 1-405 from S Longacres Wy to which will be funded through future \ Monster Rd SW-add sidewalk/paved shoulder funding packages, grants, and funding P Cedar-Duwamish Trail Connection mechanisms such as the Regional ao5tolntemrban Ave s-add mkelanes Transportation Investment District. 0 CR16g/WVafromSr ghway ander Crossing 1-405 from Strander Blvd to 5 _ c,v,R;ve,1,40 Fort Dent Wy-add bike lanes 0, ` R 1-405/1-5 Interchange rl pF Via or around 1-405/1-5 Interchange-add pedestrian/bike facilities River N�C NEE rnteh.aan rer S January 24,2005 v7iDepart ent ofatre Department of Transportation N �.. co U) O O- O O CO G V O 0 O O CCOO_ I- coU) -47 U) M U) co-r 0) CV 0 r V O .r 2 W cm No 00). M Cy YU 0) ro N N T M ON. K T r O) O 0 f O O O U) O O O O O"O II C 0 0 j 0 C) N OOS I 000C') OO �`') O f t+CJ �O OO 'O Q) I000 000) 0) O rS0 ra 0. 00 O U) U) O CO u) 0 r O o r v n o O O_ 0i6 O 0 U7 O M '° o 4U) O)U) O. Oi0 C)) d' N V N+N IUD U!) C'7 C � U C N O N N c' CD 0 ' N N UO ot • 1 N O c r 4NiNC') N I in a 6 (00) 000000 r= in000c`n8000 oo " .rU>o00 0000Oo 00.0 000000 o o M U) O O O 0 U) O co N co 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 C)0-O O C O O,O 0 ado O:O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C) 16 ° co CD o o U)Ui N o O) r C7 0 Qi CD C') 0 CD o t5 0 o U5 ...6O i ui(0 o Ui U)t 3 o U) 0 0 0 0 O V 0 -0 0 u) U)r r t ' O) ' r O co r co co U) co co U) r,r cc, O.r O) 0) N U) 0) V 0 .- C) N C F c U) r N CO .- r C) r N O) C C .' N N U)6r co CV C') 7 C') N. 0 .- N N U) U) 7 .N r M .- CC O) r e- r .- N U. L O�M 0 O 0 0 0.0 r OD 0 C C C 0 C) O CO O C 0 0 0 O:0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 Q. 0 O 0 0 0 O '0 (0 O) O0 C O O O O r- L') O O O O 0 O O MOO O O O O O O .O O O OG. O 0: 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 CO w co C) 0 C7, 0 U)•O CO N 0 0 0 CO N O O N. 0 0 C. O O O 0 O t•O O 0 CD 0 0 0 0 O 0 0,0 CO N I-0 0 C S CD Cn U N O) C) o M 0 O;;Cn U) 0 0 O O C, O O 0 0 U) O U) •CC O U) O O O O O S U) O O r D. a' N r V• V 0) N U) 0 r N O M N <r O O O.U) r p C+) ..N. V O) N CO O) 0 0 a- O) 0 Q >. 9 C r U) r 0 r N O r U) 00 CCn el N N,U) V' 04, N r y N M et M o cO. r N N 1.) co) x O a N ,- r M co N co co a)In i N r a in a el ` O . co I ell , ' Mr0OSOOO 0 U) 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 CD 0 000 0 0 U SO44NN OOO 0 C0 0 o 000 CD 0 0 0C .0 j 07 00000c0 0 N d D C c)O O r U D 60 00 C 6.6 o O U U OO o o1CO u) O - r O (C) O U) M CV V co co O U .1' Cr) C0I co co U) N CO U) U) M col.* LC) r O C C C) or) N r 7 CO O) CC N N• CV: r N r et N 0 N i 0 Z o Njr O O 0 0 0 0 o CD CO CD o7 CD : 0 0 O O CD CD 0 O O)o) Cq1 0g0BS 0 ocoo 0 0o joo o-oo0 0oo00000gp- ,,.) NI[D 00 O70 r u) O OMO CO OO ,O ') 0,O0o tO Ui OOOOOO U) u) N co r'O co U) M N N CO d• C N UJ ?. .- CI),co co Ci) r CC U) UJ r M U) r Co CO co N U) r O CO tl' co N Nj N r N T I O 2 N N O .- N A O LU 6 i N S- I 0 in Ci) rno`°oo 0;0co0 000CC') '0S 00 0 0 000000r- 00. Soo�oo!oSoorn Z N N O 0. 6.6 r In 0 0 o N M 0 •a 6 O O op o 0o O It i O O O'O o O CC) N O) U)U) U)'M N 0 Cn o 00 CO M V - Cr) Cn C':^U) U) r O «)i In et;CO CO IO r cC U) - r co Cu U) M 0 r .- CO 'V I N ; N riN ! r C) hl Q N N N r U)V N V p MCC) o000 0 oOo 0M o 0O 0 '�OSO 00 oo 0000 pOpr O. r pQ 000p 0 00 .- 0 .- 000 '0 81 000000000M N IN CDO SOCOO O OOr) Ov_ O JO O 000 Z r U1 000 o r U) co O CO C') ON O OC O C oU) IC) U) OO 0000 Cn r Q O U) ' CO r U) CO N If) O N cO CO CO CO U) S LLD N C•)op U)r N.CD LC) LCD r CO CO N r CO N CD r CD d• C N - N N N r N M Ce N Cv) r r S- r CO CoC)§0008 0 S000 0 0 0 CD CD g'8 Cc080080II)) Y N 1f) O O O CO M.0 0 00 0 00 O'O'O0CC O 0)N,OoO0.1.10 U) OCD(Co U) Oo o 0000•o 10IU) oO O'OIn o CD r- N O N M M N O 0) coCON U) u)Cr) r U) U) N CO Cn II) r M O N r P- OD 0 r M(V co O Cr) N ZV N r N r N CO N CO T r U fn 88St000go_r1U) 0000 0 C)0000`o00001 00000888C.1 M :O 0 0 i0 O N 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 O 0 CD 0 0 O 0 0 a U1 010 0 O O(d 0 O),r O O M o M O o o Ui O CD o u C0'o Cilui o[0 o 0 0 O Cn Cn co 1 U)N 0)A N (V 7 0) O N N U' U) C') U) N��-- COI O Cn r l0 N r 90 CO CO:N 1 ri0 O N N N N - N. O O r or) r OD N Z N N 0 I- Z IX o LL a c u a . I In p me ° NC re y c 6 LI c E e E w mE ' o o . co E 00 V N A m Q. O y VI m U M Q) L. ` W` N d m 5) IC F- a. Ooor a ° Urn:ti ° 3m+:° oinj, 3a m ;'ao A .2 ° 4' �10. 1.« c0 ;0 a' a8 �- cul t ,A..0i'` Ot. Yy ca ',. O as ►- • a `•. �j m'_ F0 r' CEO m - C = C Y Z a c I 0 oat d 0 0 =,I.- >. c E 0` d, C 0` E ° C'2 C•,0 a A £ m ' A'U N .0 t CA W O a 4.11a 0 W a E Q« 0 m " T D L '6 ° m E W W W �� � L Z W m C Cf) fA�E C '0"Y r f- _ . -E -°y 7 j .W. 'L m r d a 0 )IXY co'-° S 'Q�' m O E)Q >co W > ? tNU c.O. Q •c V -C 0- = O dC O y - C 0 ° 0':0 > a -X ` C y C•+ Q Q Q = a M.Z a NI i ;.A. Uiyiy ; µ W W O CAS J a 11 K a O O U 8 c : �'.'_.. O U � ; U �� �d - -'-rg c. vr'-0 ro d3aic m+u o o u 5 ; = 1°) y .0 .Na o m , o02 `o N 0 6) 0 T-0 c 0 ] >'> C N M L C(Y '°i co) a`) t U R Y q CO O 7 CO M: O 0 CO > y m w :° 'O CO ° CD p 7 7 7 a' W W CO ° W = 0 V U a N W O C_ C_ . c c e O ' Q t5 :L Co J (q a 0 0 0 fn a co Z 0 J J J = V- u) a' 1- ,-J S :' m ca rl) f- f- a 4( F UJ 3: F., .- 1— a "I N ') N M N•N M Y lf) W r W W W < co �.: N'N e- N a- N co co •Io') cWN`N tO el cam') t'1 n u genieseid 4sT siopiiJo3)g ope(°ad IIaieS pazuolovi-uoN Jotao r pue00U2Ua4Umpi ueau. DRAFT 7-17-08 Non-motorized Funding Sources: Grant Funds Federal Funds distributed through the PSRC (MPO) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ)—MPO Allocation Qualifying projects include programs to limit portions of road surfaces or certain sections of the metropolitan area to the use of non-motorized vehicles or pedestrian use; for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities; for new construction and major reconstruction of non-motorized facilities; and establishment and funding of State bicycle/pedestrian coordinator positions. This includes public education, promotional, and safety programs for using such facilities. Surface Transportation Program (STP)—MPO Allocation Qualifying projects include bicycle and pedestrian facilities and spot improvements, wheelchair ramps, and other eligible enhancement activities, including the modification of public sidewalks to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Surface Transportation Program (STP)—Enhancement Program The monies are to be expended for non-traditional type projects including historic preservation transportation facilities and museums, landscaping and beautification, scenic highways,bike and pedestrian facilities and education, rail corridors preservation, and outdoor advertising control. State Funds Pedestrian &Bicycle Program Projects that help reduce fatal and injury collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists in Washington are eligible to apply for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grants. These safety-focused projects may also support increased mobility and encourage more people to bicycle and walk. Types of eligible projects and programs include those that make engineering improvements and provide public education and outreach. Sidewalk Program— TIB The intent of the Urban Sidewalk Program is to provide funding for projects that address safety, access to generators, and system connectivity. All projects must be transportation related on a federally classified route and be consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Safe Route to Schools The Washington State Legislature provides funding to support pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, sidewalks, safe routes to school and transit. The Safe Routes to School Grants were established to address pedestrian and bicycle mobility and safety near schools. DRAFT 7-17-08 Local Funding Parks Levy Trails can receive funding in two ways. Sixty percent of the King County Parks Levy is dedicated for"King County's acquisition and development of rights of way for regional trails... consistent with the Regional Trails Plan including acquisition of missing critical links and/or maximization of regional trail use, and for repayment of costs."Another 20% of the levy is dedicated for"distribution to cities in King County of which fifty percent shall be distributed based on city population, and of which fifty percent shall be distributed based on the assessed value of parcels within a city for city projects. City projects means the acquisition of open space and natural lands and the acquisition and development of county regional trails or city trails that are regional in nature, and may specifically include local trails in underserved areas linking to city or county trails that connect to regional trails." (KC Ordinance-15750, Section 5) General Fund Funding for non-motorized projects is a line item in a city's general fund. This funding can be used to fund non-motorized projects as the city deems appropriate. DRAFT 7-17-08 Funding Source Grant Criteria: CMAO 10% for Non-motorized= 150 Total Points 50 Points=Designated Urban Centers -Based on the urban center environment, the project's impact on urban center, and the circulation within the center. 50 Points =Manufacturing/Industrial Centers -Based on mobility and accessibility, connecting corridors,benefit to center, system continuity, and the long term benefit/sustainability. 10 Points=Project Readiness/Financial Plan 40 Points=Air Quality STP 10% for Non-motorized= 150 Total Points 50 Points =Designated Urban Centers - Based on the urban center environment, the project's impact on urban center, and the circulation within the center. 50 Points =Manufacturing/Industrial Centers - Based on mobility and accessibility, connecting corridors,benefit to center, system continuity, and the long term benefit/sustainability. 30 Points =Project Readiness/Financial Plan 20 Points =Air Quality STP Project Enhancement Funds= 100 Total Points 15 Points=Project supports regional growth centers, local town or activity centers and the corridors connecting these locations 15 Points Community demonstrates support for the project 20 Points Project Readiness/Financial Plan 50 Points Non-motorized projects criteria: • Project connects or links to a non-motorized system or network • Project connects to other multimodal facilities • Project addresses current non-motorized needs in the community • Level of current and future land use in the vicinity of the facility that would be expected to provide utilization of the facility Pedestrian and Bicycle Program=15 Total Points 5 Points=Current Conditions—Do the current conditions indicate risk for pedestrians and/or bicyclists. DRAFT 7-17-08 5 Points=Project Impact—How well will the project: reduce potential pedestrian and bicycle conflicts with motor vehicle traffic and/or establish safer and fully accessible crossings, walkways, trails or bikeways. 5 Points= Implementation—Is there a demonstrated need for the proposed improvements, and, if appropriate for the project/program, a strong partnership among local agencies that will ensure this project moves ahead on time and on budget. Sidewalk Program (Urban and Regional)= 100 Total Points 50 Points =Pedestrian Safety—How safe is the existing and future non-motorized connection based on the existing condition, proposed improvement, accident history, and existing hazards. 35 Points Pedestrian Access—What is the direct access from existing facilities and structure, what access improvements does the project make, and how does the project help complete the entire network. 15 Points =Local Support—How the project affects the community, and how much financial support is the community providing for the project. Safe Route to Schools Programs=20 Total Points 5 Points=Engineering Improvements—How well the project has or will: reduce potential pedestrian and bicycle conflicts with motor vehicle traffic; reduce traffic volume around schools; and/or establish safer and fully accessible crossings, walkways, trails or bikeways. 5 Points=Education and Encouragement Efforts—How well the project has or will teach about: bicycling, walking and/or driving safety skills, the health effects of walking and biking, the impact to the environment,the broad range of transportation choices and provide events and activities utilized to promote walking and biking to school safely. 5 Points=Enforcement Component—How well the enforcement efforts of the project has or will address traffic safety and help to increase the number of children walking and biking to school safely? 5 Points = Implementation—Is there a demonstrated need for the proposed improvements and a strong partnership among local agencies that will ensure this project moves ahead on time and on budget? NMI Mill i DRAFT 7-17-08 ATTACHMENT: Program Source Timing Funding Level Due Dates Eligible Activities Competition Criteria Congressional request(earmarks) Federal Annual $0-$10 m per year Aug-Sept Various National When a significant need is identified. Congestion Mitigation and Air Weighed heavily based project location in urban and Quality Program-MPO Allocation Federal Every 3 years $20-$30 m per year Spring(2009) Air quality related projects Regional/Countywide manufacturing centers,and air quality impact. (10%to non motorized) Surface Transportation Program Weighed heavily based project location in urban and (STP)-MPO Allocation(10%to Federal Every 3 years #30-$40 m per year Spring(2009) All surface transportation RegionalCountywide manufacturing centers,and moderately on nonmotorized) related projects readiness and air quality impact. Nonmotorized projects weighted heavily if the Surface Transportation Program Federal Varies Varies Varies List of 12 eligible categories Statewide/Region connect urban centers,tranport facilities,meet non- (STP)-Enhancement Program motorized community needs,and predicted land use suited to utilize project. Pedestrian and bike safety Equally weighted among if a safety risk exists,if the Pedestrian&Bicycle Program State Annual $0-$11 m May 9th,2008 projects Statewide project remedies it,and if there is a demonstrated need and support for the project. Weighed heavily on existing and improved safety of Sidewalk Program-TIB State Annual $700-$1 m Late August Pedestrian safety projects Statewide/Region corridor and moderately on current and future ped access. - Equally weighted among the impact of physical Safe Route to Schools State Annual $0-$11 m May 2nd,2008 Routes to schools Statewide improvements,education and encouragement efforts,enforcement and use by children,and demonstrated need and local support. 1 Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Proposed Improvements The following recommended improvements have been de- tailed in Project Sheets, and have been ordered according to priority. Note that not every prioritized project has been de- tailed in a project sheet. PROJECT SHEETS IN PRIORITY ORDER 1. Two Rivers Trail 24. Lake Avenue &Tobin Streets Bike lanes 2. Springbrook Trail 25. Williams &Wells Avenues North and South Bikeway 3. May Creek Trail 27. Seattle Waterline Spur 4. Panther Creek Trail 28. Seattle Waterline Trail 5. Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes 29. Honey Creek Trail 7. Sam Chastain Memorial Trail 31. NE Sunset Boulevard/SR 900 Bike lanes 8. NE 3rd/4th Street Bike lanes 32. Maplewood Heights School Route Honey Creek Trail 10. Lake Washington Loop: Airport Perimeter Road & Logan 33. Lindbergh-Renton Park School Route Avenue North 34. Monroe Avenue NE Bike lanes 11. SE Petrovitsky Road Bike Lanes 36. Green River to Lake Youngs Connector 12. Garden Avenue North & North 6th Street Bike lanes 37. 140th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 13. Cascade Trail and 27th Street Connector 38. Puget Drive SE Bike lanes 15. Oakesdale Avenue SW Bike Lanes 39. Park Avenue North Bike Lanes 16. Burnett Avenue South Linear and Pedestrian Park 40. Fairwood to Petrovitsky Park Bikeway 17. Talbot Road South Bike Lanes 41. Union Avenue NE Bike lanes 18. Edmonds Avenue NE Bikeway 42. Taylor Avenue NW & Hardie Avenue SW Bikeway 20. Benson Road South Bike lanes 43. Chief Sealth Trail 21. South 2nd and 3rd Streets 47. Cedar-Sammamish Trail 22. Shattuck Avenue South Bike lanes 48. Soos Creek Trail 23. 116th Avenue SE Bike lanes 50. SE May Valley Road Bikeway ce a1 L v, 4- "O os N v U OI O I ++ C I U v, F- W112 c. c GJ% W Z 0 Y c L. Y O v E > o �CL m � > a " � � s >, at V O ,,; m °� c + O u CC -� N u -o c -a ra a, — v m O GZ as a, a, a, � ra � 2fp � v .ca L W p R p U w, O c `6' 03 I 2 ! a 3p °c E a a or a, m -oo 'a, ,� o � i I. a, c '" �' �° � v � w a, u vi I � c } v o L `Z rri o F ra a, c c c cc ro ( 4- a;t 'a qj o c E 4- CC IA —i = _ . C 4Noi I 1y 0LL a1E j '^ a1 m H Y t O 0 O O 45 -p ,, N I GC cLC 0 I- = 'L - *' _ 'I Y 5 -0 3N 2, a) O N co O R al l L i E c O p p O Ji C v O .- }, w �, air R "O N p Z LL O IL" ra �^ a) Z +J ra v O t tLC - (n .1 IA c1 J a) O w co N a rn Co >. 3Y = — cw c 3 o +r c O t = o_ - L Q 'L C aJ •{A I cc 0 N O aJ u = < .a ra cc a- O _c v, a w o cc (n m F- - - F- (n m U +� ) aci) c c c -c c `; i s -0 Co v o 0 c c } �, a, . o +E CO} +� p U O O Q ra 0 (n c C v a as L L •L rLa 4-, O •4 -I c O 'n L7 aJ d u C L aJ v '' v u v a a1 = v L -0 �i • �� 0p 2 0 p N = L c V V O l� in w I ___ __ _ __ _ _/ ___,c_,_.1t..),' Q^a IIii I . i,:1 _:,-,:z_ , x , �C-J /d „,..__ I�• __ V % ILA Lu Y rdA.:1 Lit'= 1i le S _ o N •• I 317 : -. CY ' 1 �oQo4 m ny `y• `�N / \yY I Ck ILI t ,a//•:,v51_ ico iV ■ MS nypw -- O > �— Q \it' -L .4.-___J a -' 4Ma_ � " V H • LLI I D MS N o I ••m / N ®p. oy O CZ _ CI ct et,. a6\ 4 .) 5.,!/■ m cn Jr 3��I ~ 1 ill c pt 03 'id J Q ° > RI a, C L L CC Q CC ft,N O 4...L ...., ' N ~ — a > rC c Ce 3. L co W +' L v Q L ...2 U > � = +� Z a m � EE> a U_ , -. c O C ♦+ vi m IV L m ho pQ Q _v 01 v o 3 �, L 2 �4 O E o_ N C N 7 u "p U .� a! C `— — aJ a.+ ro v, \ J �rj m C C ++ aJ O m +L+ 34 I— v GJ 3 In C O C N CO N al C 0 EO 3 'p O Q > - C 2 N C o v, rn L ;, a, �, _ � oc o � t Q � V c H 2 C O 9 If a.- -v 3 N a, a, Y n3 E it Wcc +r co to v, Z ( L a1 Y O Q O 4; N Q C Z v+ +% aJ ++ C i Es _ V) .t6 V) O7 J f0 _ U a E rn - - U § c -1 C W r., Q O g = L Q V Y cc ro Q L Q .- ♦/ •� Q v1 s J cc O a) a) 7 Q ._ (o CC Q— O 00 a 2 o cc u- to El I— - - I— In m 2 v, a L. Ln "3 C ZZ C -c C VI ZA •.' C s. c c o •' o aU o a c o c c * ., L }, En-., —1 C O v," 7 Lcil a. C a1VI L CD ` p, NU L a a) C a) O 01 O O ^ C V U L : a OL.) V [ '''.0 + 4- ' . = o— ! f 4� r Vim_ . 31 .,.,� z L ' AI ID 1 ' o \_ma —d ce ILI 9 '41-n 11't a=mlurs, ' .✓ Ll JIB m i�r � 0 a 1 rleg �;, .. i m4 D U a i ^i,x6 v)ak% b N� - o 4ccl �y 'films" !((� \i� ..__• ` )_ tn Eiii I' 3 — — in 1`�� m r/ 1 • MSII"n`d 0!� •v o > • I W •-••)/ 4 in" ; i ,'T-1\-i .7:11,=1.-=.d co I lig , � `° ,/" N L r\„ ,, 1 , .. • • ,_ a p 1--- � V J wc. ...I V JSl ♦ o t -' ' _ — O. a /`!u� Pie '.mom $� �' d w JI 6gth� I v_ l 3��i >"' F , . . , a ' Qi U 4-, totCD > VI O gl Ce W O ,C E �C ` LL U +' �' L u tv C To 13 rts rti u re Q iv °' O a `" m °� ro V1 - N C a c a v 0 _ •_v > 0 � uN � E Ni ~ Q v ri as c caj LL c °; v of rn Z u_ c a-, 4' — i N 06 0 as E = N as 10 v 2cccu GC r0 O ci3E 724- O �. Q v = a CU ,ti, CI` 2 O = O -p 3 to N v w N v, +, C O 0 p 2 pt, C I cc 4 o a, a°1, -0 N o z ,� o �,, o 4, N + +�, rdQ C VI Z v v a - v E o a u 3Y `-c° -Ic'Jc3 O U 2 U Q >.I Y pc 01 Y Q •- W e +, cc + NI O N rC rx Q Y O rf6 a mtn o to m HaEa1- Li) mU v -0 C C -0 C Z• C c. -0 ^ C O - 0 f D C t C1 G.) O Q L.• }j o O�• C C no 0 L +- 12.3 • ••— C p L V v C cu _ C NO U a) 1 • O CD01 ODO nC 0 iv. U U cO vi Z U L.)U• ii 4, w J U a lak (-ata a- • - - /7 groa ,5 I ID, 4s 3 41 @x \ 4, m J-- 6 w �— e I -s/..-C.•E4," it 0 j`':/E' a7 a —tom / \ y 8Z6F •slats _ •:a v- r t s (`�l� y( ww e ----m7 �--tt i r,,,t L .-16J L.,l.. M� J2 i 6 Q Q , ,_ ,Aiti K >- (1) I- i ; -tt to g�3aLi m �'0��SI . S m0 _ f- 3 CZ \ ( m r ,... li Q t 6�) a kiiii) I a f. — =0 0 as ' J MSntP . VI E7 - i I m i .0,0 f corll ,,,. •im in: o 1 10014 iibt Di I P sc't----/// • LLI , m _ ` MS N ditmr ?� o w co / VI d f ' �Dm er \ ilie03 i! 1 �D� P2/./a I_ o v I CC V �� a/` Y q \ _ J o w o Z ooY L �. �� a F. L m j ' w G m ) t(•• Vm N Q v w 5 it s, 4 to J W c > 03 a v U Q W o o uu = v L CC ♦C N Yi—j i (o C tt3 L cu 1 ..., , 1._ VI L c t L m U C L cis Z a) 4-, ,C E .. v, .� vl W H > L U > C 4- c ..... ,ac o c a °° mcc as s 'ro m O O F— a) c a) H � �. GUI a, Covc �• cri c c �. Cl; o +, �0 v, _ I- 171 C Q 3 ,� cu — C N 3 C v o li 0 �, cti ,� a _ oc '� 0 3 O — .5 = 3 v CI f6 L •Vi Cr cc i 4 w v E 112 c Jo 0 o v o w v o `L° E 70 w -c 0 Z LL 0 O _ +J ,,, ra in '^ Q c L rcs � — OIV - cEl = .`dins vip1L000c 0 � 3 d N E0 -le U f° U 3 Y �r- ,c -1 c W '7 i .0 _c _a a O M L a.) U mQQ- a = aYUv � - 00 - vt m - - Q— I- v) m < E L I o cn MIN v -c c -C c -o c v) „,., - c v, -▪. C O }'cs, 0• N O a c U O C C •� vt c c N -6 Q v O •+, O Q 'co v v V tZ v, a) c v `�° 'a Q t1 s- c..) U co O z c:::=,------,j i .....hit- ra----- ,,,,,::,,,2 1 ,,,,_....___.., ... .______ AIM 417_Ln- ,..._ c. e. ` 1 1 F%Adam L - L�L ,, ' L. It a Q N G pp v... CC rh Er) ill ill 1 IL 3 J �[C�` -•L I C� Z z n ) •c--- .4 • i `°_3h* i .: Ill -: . .------- --____--..ms CC sCO IS 4 ' R*No Ni J M J / O id-19-Z ,I ♦�`- i° �'i ,��' _ Q ono �' 2 a a °A%�' V "o ff a , . Q - Yl,r �� �� g Q-: �: 3 I- C Cr ii, � 6g>r°Ve C I •• . i rts 4! J_ = t _. v v, 4-1+� > ra ra ° '' � Q � o h fl = > -Ccrl � ) V) _ N W Q +' to Q U > 0 4- a 1- N v � � U S° vi = a00 `° � sow � � o CC CC a, }; 00 v o o ;7 LLI c vs 0 {/I 3 C Y a) 0 ra -a a) N 13 0 -0 v 00 a) i C1 L -E3 txm0E 7 Q O L. al i ++'-p o -0 C - •ns � U . !6E _ CO ate+ VI LOL Cl O to v +' 0' co a go 0 C U a) " c '� 3 aJ h 0 aJ 0-— >' in I I- N a) 7 al al al m V vh 3 Y 16 O Q rts3 > N 0 cc > ._ C a! r0 - a+ a' �O > '^ o a E -C o0o vovioErca rnal O c Q, 0 < a v v v OZLL l7 oZ .a E •t •'^ a) c cn U a) _, •cv � Q c � Q = o oQ Duo - 0 t . N so IA c E Q O a E u aa.) a >• -YCCCC ra � Q .iw T.- N = >; cc - O ; 0 a) U 0 < ._ ra cc u.Y 0 +' C rC ro 0 as 1 a v1 0 _J ern v1 m I— 0 I— V1mUU ra ccw � > OW C c trl , c U -0 V) C O +-' O v O 0 c 0 C C (0 ra +� O v O •0 O +� ra .7 WNW 4-,vs C C v "a 0_ v 2 v 2 •� ra }, '47, J C O 'A V' v a U C i • v v O a U a n y C v ♦ 'O O •^ 01 i0 D O cn C wis Ol v F a d V U CO U V j� 14/4 ., w • , � mm r,J�.r, v �'uu \ `i ILm m-G r Q I ________ . _,A,...,<, ., . .„,,,_ ..,_ \I re.gz 6.T ralitam , r -..-J6v. FA=-, w Olt w 111-1 m Jr I�. �_ z � . Q �� r /�! � 1 ( � N = � 3 N eI� �\s 'I ._(p_ ,. g°' t, , f I� r $t• O >r W Wd sir ` ,e�� { p F 1 r 1 1 / _ ,a I IJi y• [�,k MSj'�nH Per � - 73 3 IL = iJ a N Z w ILI _ v / Ito MS V1 V^ o cv w a0 1 IIT, tid /,' VI ` u o-LL sup 7A •• Pb�a�s �' g V '� �i L_ J / Or zoo cc.> 2 2a m .d� V m Oin 6gtb u 1 , �r >" Ulm i, 3 8 F E a w I c 05 Ce vl `^ w 42 _ -0 co 0 r_• C VI C r� Y 0 o � rn o o in o N O °C 3 -° '^ H fl-ns m Ce • C > tCO °42 0 C m 00 0 p Q^ _C as 'a(13 roY ` • ty � t To `4 22 00 N m N CO C j MS t ays N CO a C L a) • N LL ° p a�i • v VI -El > c y 3 7 p1 r6 N > C ++ ra N L E N p �jj ip Gl ++ I cc IC j v v v +�+ v ra � Z O � Z ' Y i — a-� Q1 i i a C a "6 C H Y N .- Q N v in Y � J w to p -' V) U -2 V) a— E +5 a) -O 5' � a w +J p CO Ix � m cq N ply +`r N pa NAY N � i1 w m i N V) 3 U N V) a V 0- a) I— � +, c C o o tea, 0 - c o N c r0 a1 ..6 Q U O aj 2 ,9 .� + i� -� C 0 v v d v C a� v v u Ca v, v C v � � z _y �..,.enV 4 s i .,. °'_s 1- � r�NI y / > CZ to IN _ _ O " y L C iP r �� r'L j MS u 3 wi �1 i-s LLl O O I 1 r1 Z Q o73 m O 3 0�11 LI > �s P2i a r :` " ® P W Q t,.:7(-\ L 4 O 1 ,reed'4"'D- -�—. --dJano_ CC _t:', _,,s Need�anopuy Y. ✓' _ a' '_' `. V ?z4 ��, • Ir -b �c I4. f..iri A J.La. a 41BS e ! �1� kJ Q a 2 1— C ; J CC U Z u >.co ii' 70(13 h I v DC ,,� '-'T W V z W 0 Q1 ..0 a1 �+ Co- O Z U `" s1 W C (0 C Y C�C W C C V N O J a) Q) co EG v to 52 a) tn O u cn N a) H 4.7 ,J .Y C U O 0 co - cH in p 0 U C VI f° cYt p = YO I = O a) 'C Q 0 — Vu1 a) 1- fC C a) — L v, C �. U I � 14 sv, � �' c 03 Z 0 `° � vo Z ra a) 0)> Q 3 o Y C in Y J ._ = O ifi— - - V N - ct - - � v -O I X roca u1 X r6 a) Q r0 C aJ W J d Ni W U 2 Q aaI- < U ra C C O 6 O a) O a C u 0 C C N C rpL r13 rII 47,' 4--, -Cli0 1- C LQ v O -, O2 .� +II -}C-, J C 0 Ln l� N a U C a) L CD O O U v C0 ra -0y cU = 4---;A,z U C O Ira 4 in 4. W ill as aF. aI 11t' � 'r1 T fin` IA. _ - ` t ,� � �s aye , 1 igg� . n-, \ ir� CD U ch ' ' II I 12 fL Q z _ n, V-p Cs,.-- �,_ (`_fir Lu E p O •=7: 1 Es v J = 70 L�P\g �'�' `L m dJ O Q Q \ . 3 , pro =D sec 3 ti. � � � •C3N - H II* u!l . 4� �l , O cr `?y.�� _ tl � I V 7---i-N., li„ La N - �ashin v r V cQ ' . ( 0 a 1 C Q -a c a. t a)v 3 0 C LY01 0 CC L/ a) QJ Y U V V a� cts t 0 w v C�J , N N Q ate+ O m 0 a. W Y 1 -faC — o o a I I co .0 T3ns � � E VI ' Z L, Q + Ji a rn 0 77, � , a vJv 0 0 0a) ns +� U I T N a +�, LE �O M VI CU �. o o Q E `^ u 0 o a �ii U ra Z •• O C 2N (C 41 vl N Y J J GJ 4J YO Q '� — 2 W C 3 C I a v�i ¢ v°Ji a) > awI- m Q ra o�'c +°-J' 'h -0 C _a C C ✓, '' V 9 —0 c C O O v o O- o c +J rz .� +' N .Y v ( 0 r675 Qcu V a O .� ♦ O O a. 0 •v as 0 m 0 0 c 0 ?' ,Jz W 0 . 4- y 1 __r + . i - — 10 _ Sao CZ ►� to 0 W e— T25r a- 17 S 3314u01e1 —T"= '- Z_ _ La v�1� 1 J II auy Pb anen3 �� Z rc �. in II ,..1 p in I— MS V`_l S L jbNN I � ® O .< Q ; � l M e 1 .1 i I In — cr I 1 a laV +, O v +] Q N O IA N ON C 0/ 1— , V► J Q t co W N t c ,, ii; Y Z c s `° o v, 2 i Ll..)V MJ m O 5 W c 3 +, ✓ MJ W Z 3 Z N rNa °J v Z •- V a 1- W 0 CO t > o .c 'n. u �• � Z vWi v v0 too o W 0 U C To as O 0 a) '� > a -c J �, v ~ to Q 2 > � 0 � � 0 � C p J a U Y � _ � °J o O J I O ra O aJ rn p ¢ � � � +,c • c � v > °1 O rooa = O L >.N Y r0C 4J Z 0 0 •V rts Q N ro • ate, vs v+�i Q E tri ' in Z C C s _Q C• d N r0 N -O N u V ._ O LA + u C W u Y O > O .+N0 C O '^ uXW N •L W Z _ N d X W 0 u Q r cv m Zak Q - W to O 0 O a O p Y O v O _ •O Q N '+, 4-4 r0 4_, .�.Y J C O to t. 4. U C N vs c 4 •N O N' OVJ U n vv v Q} ♦ O U U O O OZ errCZ v U z I jam _ „Ir Z L o in k _ .L. i'll''''''-j; i z �g >Z O v.,,,,_ pm �� � ' LP Q Q 1 ir n i. . '-vG i ' ^iu 1 1 rl o- n INQ aJ o .4 f n e 71 a, noIMI 1.11e1et11e1Y lc •1.11y 1.11. �� } Z • J ,,r 6 0 3 } . 1 3ti Y. — "n- VI >- QO Z 3 O �- - g1.-.i 6 I i■�Jt -,1,iji—, \ ILIR_-� _' Z 3 n �!2 �,-. : , .- DJ/ env...... r 1=17 'filez N aD L' ..1 G �. r z Iez______,,,,;0_,,i,:;_,j4iii.:•-• ,. Yam,... T � -I, .. .N � m _-. ..cam' V u imr, ♦•<5 __ z �$ �� �Q .. ___, , p in. n v r-7 - I illw c J v, CL cra t cc co in a) To C libY >_ co C1 z CC v 0 no a o v s , C C> t Y CaQ W _ ) i O O a ro •r /4 LC a) 3 Y U as C o CO CC 8 03 jQ C I ate`+ ` �OJ I ' G LLJ8 > a1 t0 > V ID Q 1.n aJ a1 m 4-' V V) 1 C C VI d ro E N 'y- al a) (0 — O Q I� C pl O 111 a V o a� l7VH Q a.c a U' '0 C L C -0 C v) iii V C -O of 4 n C O +' O v O Q c aJO c c , •. . 0 ra O(0 � � VI O }, 0 � C (a -* Q 2y .2 a U C .., .-, J C O U NN pv L cQi V dv,0 v) O D ` ♦ T C V V C O w LA VzI� ¢4 . • L ________ _____ C'43 zs-'1..._1.z.L/1/ i --j_V,..JJ PieqV t I 0 j c15Z V)-csfl i dN WIY iD�v J` - N UB W cad _0 I • N 1 t W m od i N -f,�i 4hCZ Of V i Nr T"t I, I_ Q (>= i Z N; anyU W p O I io �! Z 1 •� -2p �1 T. —1 t _ O T j Z IC _O r ('n c0 CC a)t ••• �la� Em Q n a • - gbm W Q "E)0 In a`rnc; i Ni Q Rainier Ave N •, cc L LILATill " L--1 "PZ) 6 a 4400DDD UICoao I i N MI 00 W '6 i C al Z C tp — r0 v, p1 a Y ;4' L Vvi C y ,c751 O u •u o crl W + v, aa) C - i 1 a0i pia Y - cc H VOD o �� Nu " ''' v - = c �o '� 0 c tY3 Q (L CLIJ ciri aJ 7 cc C Q aJ _c Ol `— N zz CC i 30 av cs Yv . a 0 LL Q1 'X j aaJ a) O J C E 0 '- LA rn 11.71 L !— 4f w "O U O •Y o f �, O -� w u vi Q co co v, Z L Z a1 `C° O N t .� O -pw 3 • 0� o V ♦� Qj in c c6 In S = c = 4 Q > f6 . v 3 � Z - ZU � f6a) atn0 LA Q +J Q O L_ _c u as p u Ce O O `n cNUJtn O � u �� c M d 2 E 'v C O V 2 Y J i0 2 to O — c W O rn c � � wQ `, o_ 4 O°1a QUCB m cc a. Q �Z a CC -1 cri - r ea = v c C - c v v; 4- c D CO '� 0 v O a c , O c c rc ,- in O 2 O O'" co O it9 VI a1 aJ 1" . �r O Ocu D O 0 D O in c 0 v, c �. 0 Ir Cv fa. �� U U OO O Z VI U U 1 �� N ' _1 ' i -- -. " _ w } fir l hL Uf▪ 3 1 - , i____A____ "�° 3s vwu �,v1 raj-. IC ,J� `Z a v \ 1n E� 't _:In ;77 1:_, 1): __,, ty J i'- -�.v..., .r ti fc 1, _ [Is -9 W lb _ Q .11 l_ 'I'WNN IY'-- 1''' a _ ,� — 3s av awl = i �eaer F o 3'° H CI,E,,, , b IO t�i''� f - n r J .',r n�, 3s.nv wwi V 0 G w W O �: W >Z I as i ' TW-1-41/411114,- 1 �r■ a-� n Om 112 Ian 3 1 ! Q 'I -a '--s(-' -2'r11,-Ft .'"-...0A i ✓` i ' 1%i 4_ Ad#� V Q K J ct . - � o lJ — _ � r� I✓ Ic_- , Q "1-*' "L.,. ;1 Ai A >' -� o Q B � . . l63 a: S . a� wno O 0 Q 30 N ., in IA >. >. VI E aJ f6 f6 C • JOB CC vo3 3oc � >_ "_ i 4 Z CC N + O a i U V ra L ++ win 01 O O Z C O „ t tb IIa1 W Q' Q.cT O c N OQ Q v j 0 L ._ v' � Z F- o - >: 0 ° 0 �cu v' Qa � ° s W w 'v a 3 al v v al Q o I2 0,. 0 0. 0 E o "0 +-. al c u 0 c YaQ a °' �mJ CA it °c al u +J c v cca a, C O et. = � • -�, �t a;� O >} _ � � acal Qo uo ai� ° � vc 0-7 v u . oou vi rn O -a `-p V Y (6 N 'V101H Z J Z V .t v1 U C C 01 N n C s cc U >` !C C c Q Ol Y •N •-,= a/ U 3 rn 0 U W a/ C 'O tC Ix g - w 45 Z oo v� � a � CC I-- vvi � Q tnv� C roc U ii• C O } O jai p - $ p ra m ~ Oim V O O }' ra O N Q i +� 2- vl i aJ 70a, :.....i.cu v V a v •cam L 8.-, A, • O 0 Envs 0 0 0 N o 7t4., w it i;—= �d �o S. t Chi-� -- ►„ E s c - Do t �UR •� Zi ti�^fie _ �, -�!` w 40g L.u..pIa4V �ii G� �/ l_._. i li - cA/'(e "tl- \V• �a o a v J = 0 1 gam_ , O O c c H w L —.I .. % .r CID z D V C0.) K7 ®' \ p Q > W c \ N Ue tl = [- a �O Vf O OL Iii F- 5o 0 ♦ �ki V{' a 'I�IIIIIIIIiIIIf11//IN• , '''-O__•}• c' 0_ -- 2 E W ny : - W Y f m E a- -1,-� ~ 1 p U Q V w -' _ �`x ,y, ._ ._ _ 6 Z a ..------,---,--i-ce-,2`0 5--- i a • t i c>> Il N V1 W f ' — NvQ to VI of p.•� . 1� �_ u�0 �1 V ✓' CC r L (krier 9 6 c iil J ` J P a I. / ��� E, 1" Q • 0. ez `"0 n! - r 1I v I r 4 A 1-- I lit c ' p a2 Y +, c -' E EL) 2. v vOr° -� o .0 IA as � `� v Q v▪, � cc uo3 c � o LI ra vY illin • _c 4-, Y fill Z W Z `ot^ t Y c a O � o � v � o c i ci, t,Li 0Zz � irs >. QJ W w v Z f6 g 3 oc rot co m O Z > _c rts a, O "' O 1 O O O 01s al u v ♦r V i 2 a w vz c > -o 0 C ec u. N 0 0. Q E 0 al c V u vv+ c p a c > ro i` Q Z w Z a' p O a) > dl +� -p — vik L ... Q rn 6 .c `° N •_C 4- ro v O 'ro :� VI t v `n a/ � � W ...,,� a Q Q"t vl cow m �J I— aoc a� N � G, � Q ,_ oc .2 _ic= O Y_ ,„ co � Z � a, O t � roE 1 a o... Y � v a +gym o c E .: ot L. v H ♦, c s -a aJ c +, u v► ITS ra pi— > a t.) i p O 0 Q p i .3 3YQN v O � Y cE a �O l� a1Z C C is > vi ZJZ r0V ++ �vf -- 0 , '� U vi Z °� �_ .71 0) Q .I_^ al c N p v1 a, ?� C1 a) CU co '4- c r� ra E v c C O ro T. - O Y E J E N c V '5 O _ a+ "1 Y > ++ aJ -0 Li r0 C aJ Q Y = w aJ U X a1 > X C ut aJ .— a1 a1 Q aJ CO ++ o C ro i a w V .— mQ U. 0 = Vm tnCCd2H tnJ 3 U CO VI CO of AM V, -0 C t C -0 C N iii +-. C "0 C O +- O O Q. C U O C C ter0 c +-, tn v 0 O +� r0 O NW +r C V1 C QJ O Q a.) O •4-, L • .++ cC +-, C •- J C pvt 7 Cl) d U C "- I- C .� ia ♦ •o O p U n. 0 a) c a) 0 �C) d 2 0 = O v, C 0 C V V C O .� t. a V z V --, w 6 q �a _, .. B .....,�` o i nt, No yZ , in Mpr:0---,..,U ruagy �� W W �y a r- _ . (;:::::::j:7 Y C U a CO CD Cf) 0 fl` = w ° l� w w o 1 1 '% C z ct; o a 4, N 1 k7i h4 /--- ♦ 'sue— Q NM /11 IRf sou. f1f sal tois4` .�,. .. — --- z I $ z _ �•' Z m ' I SLL - Y r c ~ cc„,. { V LI W - w a Raga; VC W� ' a �� (V_I iNg :"7�1 riic of 2 fit, Vf • " �� saMb-um Si1i1 ri4 O III ,�1ilogjc JI eJLIL�L�UL1 a J 1 a s o 73 1 '/i IMF' ST : r ti a¢ � 2 I 11 WoQ u1 3 rs r W a) aj Y ' r_ 1— Z v r0 d, o 0 ° a, 3 I QJ I . Cr) � 0 4- E • aJ Q to - '0 c a- - N C t .- TS p 0'-' , w J >_ p to v Q U c cn V CC o Q O O `^ a, c v u QJ �' p ate, c ,i v ati V O rn c ° �, v m 0 Q o +1•+ •— r0 lJ Q tv v C a, O• r0 >.D U > nu o to \ N r0 I0 fa . a, - f0 t%i 3 C ++ O 0 C V v >- -p a, is p h H N N • v c O W > rn N c > E V oiler! ram _u Q - um c } a, •a, "' oN c C 0 v - •� ra w >. 4 > O N c c o o v o w E > v, 1 to W o N 3 Z >_ a, v J Eb aciQ, aM NO QUO c � N r— mQw � J _° � ; �� — W 1- CI- 3 a •u t v r0 0 _c -0 0 co C If C °n QC c W O Y C p o' aJ '�' T Y t = O Q a, aJ r0 ry "p a, 15 O c N to cc 7 E •C _c ._ Y ri_0 U 7 OQ Opp C C }�+ •O O rz H '0 acr my •m I- za3 - U Q3 +2, r0 V3C4 -0 c ..0 O C tri ,.,; v c -0 N C 0 }' C v O C o c = • a' o ' m o •a, • , O cu �ru 1 c r0 N Q v O O .2 +, 01.7, - C 0 . t7 v - c 1 Lry I-' v vaiO J v c, L. OlVeH i dY. V V O ,, V V \ ,•t 'i \ ill J Ic " ram +r, N3 I -. '~ i 4 `J s in - ff"�� LE,t Q Q f _I d } ..&c ^ lL Q F i I11 FF O n w - > zO I _ � ,y TO 0 _ s I iw cc u� 4 li JL o _i .. , Qa ' 4r Q =1a O. I- I _ N ',' N W W O aj E I ' 0 Z v ° - ' O CU C. Q 2cccu C J J (y0 J 3 cyi . V' LY -O ra Q O Y N 0 Y �j p l7 ro lJ *' •� I vi Z o .� v Ya v l Q� Ty ~ - v at ,as � 0 \ cc a Vl (0 O L > +-' o Z `° '�_ 141 J 3 . c = � '� N- W n � a vim 0 I E- VI O qj CC Z Zt ` OJv ccc1 O 0 �, CU > a O O Z . O Z +�+ 0- .- O 'C 0 Y ,� Q Z O To ` to' Y N ra J ca -p 3 Q Its j O 3 C Q "p C vi p -0 QJ i in w z u roc cc O O v Q > C N O a tii 01 . ro N Q- 0. N Q c J t0 0 C = N c L G1 >, 3 cc Q In N • O T. p - V p rC C CC mi` aaZ m 'Co � al�-- . < c .� ' -0 C - C -o C '- ,,, a-- c 75 Ln = Co E .o ao C uo CC no ft CO o •u o 0 0 �' )n C v av 0 C •� .-, 2 }, o •�, J C p 'n 0 Q1 0- V C i N v N V V v� U1 C v 2 -o • p 0 2 o Ol �0 0 a a V V p U z v ��W., w I ' 1 671:47E .2 2 IL.,\C,_ci)-"1 ---v , co In 2 gV i --. .E4pol u.-33-TV ',I; .171 �I N _ Cr __ . _1 0� -,L Ci , ,,,,, 766 ,... . . ""\.. '..' ) (- ----,c-D L- 70. (p; ` in I �.,t-� N fly\ ` ���� 0 . a v/6�`/�,�',��"'C\` `m W W z O a0 zcaC :I JL'.7 . \C> �> ,- I QQ I Z 13 v laird CL7t5�� .. \ 3 w _ �1 . 4.`". ' 'i.?'1 i!I • , (� �• -°' O > o N -__7:7141u..: 4.‘1:4111—F'''- -1"-J. tniall— CZ CZ __I ____ cp Y_ -- oom 0w a Nci 1....Ei,0 L cc s Zo± I [ III —1 1 Q w CO CD CC cT N 3 -- , ��� a A* 1 f r c,?.2.m,.._ hi 1 I C Y d O Y Y 2 c v Y I VLLI � � o �' ea ea tw ZCL ° a j a .� ate, a; ° .L cc 0ra tv a) C 4- v D u u C v o u O I �' c 3 � Ev v � t^ rarn rn >. Q1 V v `t ° V v a a a C v a mho � N N. oo > � 173 � o ° s o a n +� co c g �, as v f V m e tut v, o Q-� Q _ c i p ° -a vc \ a) ra J r6 — - N in H 'n0 0 CU ++ Li) H al 0 � m c � �; p cum O u JOZ O � a I 0 Z NN O Nm i Y p1 vOi v O Q ° x a� +. -o v -° 2 ra v a, v O J � •_ rn � £ N Luc r°a vvia) ._o 4- 3 2a) I � !k Q � � ci '- C 13LJN co Z13V1 W O -OL) CC ut v v o v +°1+ O Q r'"a Z � "o a, ,- H O � r�o > rLa ++ -° N v� a) CA w ▪ v d Q v v O Y F-- J J ro O O t W 0 va E _ Qv Q > > - cc -oQ ,,,, v o c I a a > � vvi � tn � Q- a a � � m Q Y a` a V N -o C - C -o C r a-' `� -0 '''' C Cc VI • V 0 ac o v O O0 o4- Oa • • O v • 0 v,3 C 1- � • ++ (73 N C N Q a, ,, .Z71•}, J C o n L j d U C▪ QIi te-L * 0 o L. ri L) L.) L.) ill 0 4. V' / � t1 I >t R �r� yin- : a ,,,,,,,,, i___ V� -'� © Y D L_6J=C_ 1--c 1 I 43I \ 1,_ 41E1 II LLI VI T . I �' _ o — MS\ I P Y 1r rnb uiicn in- - CZ W CL Q h C V i N - Wit'—t\ �•. - ' 0 _ 11 h ty,.% o c C!:r cr II V Q n It MS ant/arpsa up LL) Q th Q yfa oN kJ C CC Icc �'1II 1 ; '` �81 c am,co-,�-2—, _« 2 o U ra t .� ca W v ,n U U L _a2 z co 0 V Nu j wul CO j 0 C v O O F— v N H •4-, •- 8 O v X rp >_ O "a W 0 (o N o v� u D v o j v w Na) ra co .c a O c In Z N +, •iv m Q p _ -p t0 [O W d _c N --I O N vi N '- +v., N 0 H v �e L „_ 6, i_ M Q a N 3 � L^ -10 �a v.0W uo � c p O W O ip vl N +� O. v 2 +„ Q 2 O C 4E' aft Q ~ UJ N N ra N +, N +�+ N 30 . , v Y ? 3 c 0 c = c . 2ov N N of � N •_aw +�., 3Q 2O 0 Q7, •_ 0 i W Z t v Q -c ° - c t N c o 4-' Y H ^ •E 'Ci N c s 'u C CC t v c° it Q c v >s I CC o .c }, -0 •- O X N i X O u O Q v+'i C O t M L W in N a Ln W vl m m a N Q +., 1_ < E a-, Ir C O }' 0 v O a C uci, O C C -, c 0 Y Q *NI t ro QJ � a Y 'O)'Z., ---I C ° n V Y C- U C L Li Q . v CUO it)U 0 a Tv' a @ O •o °' O 0t ' A a ri •47 V L.) a Z .-; / r— ;jis vqt,, , n r L� (, §sv iiii cs �_ - 5 /: ��6m / • �j `1' W w ( , ‹.1 Y amT . Hurel -, tr. Ili' ✓ N \om`R . 11W ___ L " _“V i Ilu ._„ I- - B `, ��� * .. in W w ^ �ms��� ' � ; 1 O_ oas f m at+111'11I 1 1 4-0- i0.1..I,1oi-__1_ ,P"- L. / T k c> P2f ailed 3 0- i _, nI .4..� 3 }z • / rL ‘ LI _ MS'AV' n L...—inf ' — yr } �i Z j, O 0 3 (iI ;_L_ 1I U m NI OQ n _, MS any alepse u 0 , 1 _ �r a 'Z { g-ii c 0 r K J n 3 h���nopu , --�._ J i 5th d Jenopuy Q _ Q 4 l l// !�'P�Z9 .mI / II f.) n -g�1r'=�} -1 ,- a .n� Y ifl G - tu et a ms I o f6 a Zil z c D(CI Mir Q o � o a *' oa) V Oa v) + v1 Z c c c al c° C WQ v o c '( a' Ya c 111 v ' v I__ I—~ Eric orn Z v °c L � o � � v >, W in vi v ? `a ai L u > > W a a t 07 Q Q U O C H v, \ W p N io N = c V 'r n Q ' C Z V u ra N C N c a) N Ol J - V a Q vi = c p o c • += u Q (13 o Q p > c (13 o m Q _ O = oi o rn a, CL ! 0 W % = c 3 c Si Luc . i_ a1 f. Z v1 E tr -t3 >.;C O c V cc I -c 3 zv �' 3 f0 u � J z _v o too o � Q ° 30 -C u � N y NN N O � rC p1 O 03 X o o v ink a 0VaI- Q •c7 Q m w in ,f) _0 z. .1__ 7.) c .n vs 4-, r- 75 kn �n c c a) Q a) 2 +' 2 .� ro .7, —r c 0 v, 0 v a u c• a v •y a 0 a. v' v c a) ` ?3 Y • 0 � 0 •o 0) . D p 0 "' c r r Ab d d '-' u 0 O V Z v v X r - l� • V w i , 1_,.?___. ,yy ;biz-, : i • , , ... .�T p ii, , • , , M • t., a Y D 1 Yz Z o m r 4e . \\/� a. a" Q< f U �J�r m m T, L._ . I a- j 11149� � \° nro c r'it ww I . -' - W Y m-G.p J Z r t_ wL� (i t s J N { S r--> Q V CZ `mill 7 n, 0 .: 'YZ,, ur \�-4 3 Q rD F � r_ - v'! f a�bot F _ ' Er--' . s a 2 1 Z Z 1 w w i` c ~-r0 x'3 l7 p v a N ' v~ aoig Mj W Nvet > i U> � ( ��_� SEDnb�I� ll SiC N a� Q - , c b,, r VIh CC k.5 i 6 I td"- L x - a _ .,ail ,H o r7. ..,_ ,, , t) 1 . Q S r 0. • 3 i -IL�Lr Jy';! / 'I' F I N �, C W y v v " a� >, a) CC S M in L ++ QJ N V Q .� mJ 5L 3 ra as U u •v O- Ql -O Y_ f0 'p N rp W trt O M v Q OYZ to I' to _e _C O a CD 0 O Q u 13 cc OQ L Li) .... ...., Nj Z v N� pS' fi id i >, H = Q CU= O -0 1 M V j , I- C O ut = C To C O O C > ++ C +, •— > O WI C -0 O n w ° VI M � C Oo. 0° U a, rn-0 o ° � 0 C N 0 a) O t/1 W ut L 'al C - 0..0 Iii O al C ut t0 t/1 Ol �' 4- ++ `�tit N mN v f6 rra MI c 92 _C E E = •� C O � � c v N v a' � '� O o c = 0 3 dLril N its vl Q E w 4- tJ Q aCp a, -acc JOoa, v � v °+�' > o �� � I 0 v N Y rn a w U aJ Y O +r 3 a� a) 4,71 O H a •X vUi � � a o _c o h o c v 4• O a, � 3v v 3 � o � ciiv � 3 � rn > v CO cit Z N vl v O N O tic Q v I Cl. Z E ' C C o i_ N N. .C- tf aJ aJ C al > Y J W WC tnO O Ou cc c X O N 0 +`+ X a`-+ U < t Y C C ,--A 0 I W to U M U N W N m 3 CL of I- Q 2 t0 d d' o C C C C C 0 -, 0 O a G aJ .O c co cd 74 C(t3 '4- + ou 0O O Q Yr C ro p) —_ JC 0- v � O ' V CI- U •C N� lN 0 v v a a v r a � 2 0 I O 3- V V cO O ,l0 . ¢ w II 11`., a 3 0 in -1"— _,. 1 1. Ni 1 to IsRp h F 191�� I w w O i -'--'-- 1"'j.'; 6 I Icy 1;C - ii - Ji ' JiiL 6 7 -C 1— ..'"° .-- .�k e ar �_ �. ` r'a W.'.'... Mr r'yb4 ' m �... Q O ' tee. 3 tu �,.,, 0 O ti- v,wiena ` `-._�. LL r I- I _ � ::- _ y is Q Z -t -_, ms wv o UL _ b -- L CC in ,,.� V - --�_ M it S r=/ 65in.„ --. r =,. i i , w Y 1 11 z ,# i� �i ryfMieq wAvii l;._�..... , _ E Q , . d a/ a t ; toX 5 pll w f -�=�- 7e,a''"woos 0 l g ii G yie 6 co v c v Qj m N m m Y a Z• .(7., > O rc 111 ..0....) W w ill e v, w 3 `n � - Ym a. > _� W Z a�i O _ v�i N v vim, 'u m O ' +' N N t v+ 0 Y UJ V nc O L Z "OW s ^ 00 "Od "_ CD Q ro ��` W N CO o � Z c > c 0 Z ° a N N v 0 3 v, 1 _c .— 4' 3 O p Z w `" +' `� W O =• uV � m v '� � O Z 0 Zm Np a v � a, � wnc °" O 5O l0 W Z 73 i1 +_' N O i •u .> Z Y 0 ( ` 0 N 'vZ r0 § OZ E Nwl, 2, L I N N �- 4J• v1 Z .0 C CD N 0 Z fV ,n U a u` O 41 u Y L^ 'p —I CA J O ,ten N w E - 0 Y rn u < C 0 Qo¢c Y . C v .0 I a Z N � V min m a cNF- m 3 ¢ u > cc co 0 a, o c " o cC - En•7, J C p vl• �, l.7 N u C N i c re) vN O al U a. O � 0_ o d V a) V vi VUz � W-iiid n LI ►u l ?rye _ I.-- -1 Wage C A r,41 d,GA a n j.--r—r—riv.. , 1 un,i.---4, n€ ( i 4„.=\ V _i., ,oa\ ��a'�,env aauoyy w W Z O sU 4 • �--1, �t > Z r-_'' 1 a"J o nor.- �.�� w 'I Q Q f _ f J a C11 Q i— J �4�' �i -°ay�t�c' �y� �1[ �� _ Ij. __ 1 4L , , i �1 ow (( , ram, \$ 0 Q 1 h��yu77 Z a H I' i I >w w �'t ^� IA .tin� W • r N r• --:72:* ill 41111.1 0443 I g E$ V \ sL QZ 2S '.- r `r 3Ica \ W u sc U,1`n . Q \ N 3 - _ Q. R=`nA� �� ` O. Q �`� I 1 c VIu o C W Z m a N Z w 4 a CC ut `6 v O a0i J 2 a T. ° -a a) > Y Y avi N o Ii w LEO in? l7 o N a, I 13 �' V1 in m > I H to W is �^ • a o Q� _ al J 0 aJ aJ 0 1 c 4 h Z s v 0 4-. o H Q 2 0 in ,n k a 4 +' QJ 3 aJ f0 vl 7 oO aJ in Q +� V14. CDfCcu C Z in TO < "_O Q 0 C _ Vi a C E o U = Y2 -1 a_ •._, lit! O vi Q•- Q r0 � re) O Y vQ DA C IA p c 1 a N m m V Cl. v� I- m Q U v1 a.., ICC CC C-0 C C I) C iri a c Uf Z C 0 *� O v O O C c � °I (t � o o . .0 — o al.Y c p 0 l7 v a v c L ▪ a) W v v v 0 a v c v ro E � __, • �r m O � 0 O O D o vt▪ C O a a +, V U • O U z x V �' 4' w • ii 1?il LTA 111'9L I __ ,. ....s! 1 .1 N CD 114 , r k• i,n n� s �' ,l``� , ';fro O s y }- 1 Q Q ��-; H ,„\„,........._:.=_,r._ ,_r_r_e_ 3FtEil� ''v l- {nI 1` 0 k1I ; Q Z O CY J 1- 6n NNU V • I f3,:'imfa z. _I r : _ W LL�m • - �, ,• F. ..R ry �/ a w PLI alley 1 O A li '%_ ' V.'3 - i �I 3 V 5 _ III € J : w J - - ; MS env elepsa,,e0 `-i •� In Q IL Ic >- ..,I — — a J s 0 Hi 4; Wa, et c V 45 i iv 0 IA 2 m ..leUI v �' Tol/1 Cij I—= j aJ a,LAJ � rn vv aE 2 v = m o Co"" O F- 2 c o 0 Y c o 0. o � cac, 3ti � o o � � vi I Q c 10 a, U F > c ON rn 0 0 c CC = ra 2 c cc us ••ro 13 M t °, as a,N c `n Q- p N aJ pr cc 3 c J ro a; -a a v env' V1 Q O v -D 1 0_0H � w CLv aJ j v o ' 0 Z Z a °fa Q- O O= Z o O a v Q a, Q c C ! Q Q •v v U, vUiCC � W �a) >.� , � . � cc 0,. Z 0 ra 3 cOcc v — 3 0 c � w t v; 3 z V m as L_ = 0 >. = 2 v •u cYa J Q O 0 v in V/ c CO 0 D a z v0i o a` in 'co 0 a CI).— i .e 1- as H rco a � 0 WO N CO C �a, 0 a c vo CC AIM Lr) 0 c aJ -a a v 2 '�' 2 .a a +.+ C',T. J C O .t v a U C +- i i a, S ♦ ,i O to •— C51 . n O 0 ,,, c o of 0 ? a C +-, V V O VI V V z OW j' a7Y V /v J J c At i d -� a �` 3 I o a -0 , W 0 U pCw4..N l I 6 \ .� �'�'�'•Y i •Y Z W �f '0. H G� J Q 4, C [_LLI,12.___.7 1,:i . ••••,, _ \ feu-" ,,1�`� rM �� ,c�� u W a u� O o v a pc:---'14.=.., ' ]rin , . ` ra ? N as c o w ill J Z oom a) tu Date ` 4)_�/ cf) t AvNon 0 — �_� W c c U w CD ID .>_ uu et co ¢ aAtyV iesm =W> I ��U F �N .-">— >� m° W caTc�o aa > Y �m�o r LL ,c o-� I�j ,�_ v oil 1 E -I I1— 111 , c . ILI 6: >, : 1 B---13 a) CC 4--' 4-; 0 Ln o 73 -ci 4-, tri 0 a) 22 3 = u 8 4._ I 4,., 0 in ra re la 0 _c o cp 2 v, +-. a) 0) -C 4-, t.r) 73 in vl c 5 -c LE cu Cn in _C "le =• 1- U ra 2 .° . a) _c - v, 4... M N C ''' E ro O a 3 a) "-C3 r...4' 0 -C C in L c c co v, ,r., 1 t 0 s, „, C 113 W -J W -le a) 0 tz 1_ cc LU Lo .- 5- al •• (13 u = ris -0 0 ru v D 0 0_ i v) 0 c _ _1 _. a) — c t) uj +, a) WO 0 n > = o a > 2 --6" > o E 0-4-• -5 ris = 8 ai vi• 3 Z - F.- To ..-. D 0 tj E ti c '- I"'" O. 0 7i ' Y -I 4- = 0 4-4 • 3 17; wig. cc 0 I a. I m z. _Ne u o < c cc LE 7 o •- ci Li Cci ei5 0 ci_ < 1- Li NNW V/ v -0 C _C c "0 C v. •..: t5 -0 '-^ ., C 0 ''-' 0 CU 0 a 'E a) 0 c c ra ft -47:--- U) .4-7, •f) -47, 0 0 m .0 ow 4-• c to C •- 0 u 0 v) 4-1, a.) ,... '47., .,_F It- 4-• .F:r)-47, -I C 0 v' 0 Y) ‘-) •- tn 4-, 0 ,.. c , • GJ ., 5 Q., ,t, Li0_ c_,.- ,_ cu L70._ -0 • a 0 •-, c 0 a) 0 4-, v) c NM a. 2 c L.) L.) g 0 .. .;_-, : 0 `z ...,x_ u u 1..0 0 4 4- -4.1 ipr 4 . i< io ,.....x.iH.k1 : tu 1 LT) i >. 26E0E2 ,. kt-_,F=64.- EfiEMil, , . 1-_:'_ ! 11 -(13. c i ID I0 I r----\--• ..i, 6 -:17-1,--w-- ,3 ,., L....a).6. \ .• v et,.-, ,.., I ""- ,' I 0 -------• . L_,,a._ ..] 1—...4V-,„ "., ,="i- -- ,t,..,.,.:").,,__-. •1-2_. :1,tift .. ur:iiii. ----.1 'zr _ =_ 0 up .-415 I To tfe-j/"4Mcc=, rzi_g-cZCOM , \ .. av,„,../• , r.''.•" 47-11S16, lag-i . ,...\•0ot R 1 : '_,e 4;•'-'` ItS c'-----' • 6 plffelfingr--z,•.1: Ic. ›...- ;//-r -- -11,-1L-JI:ri - --iil' 32 )--- cf) .4 LLI < <c CZ CZ _, •([ •--,- co .1...--6, ISL..](3-3t7 SW-0 1,NI:f--,.... (c) Tn' „.;..... c aLT - -- 3 u_ -‹ • ., ,a,..c 8 . ,r,... ozwiram ._ 0 > R5 -62) . -. . IA, ! .:-...... ._.., -7\ 1 In Z , e _J 1-1 al Lai CO •- a- (1 CC CO ' S ' A 6 -E. 0 I• 1I ct .:z u IN it, -6e- -- w , % '' . o 2 >,-,E•- ik,„ ..--.- 65..c 2 /A-n, • .. k.) UJ 1 in E)to E' -r---- ,, U 0 I I r• —y•=i ,,,,. a. .,____.../ • : ..c7) ii, ' v .ai t....e , . . , it c , 0 nNW °��' a X -0 Z ra c v v 1- Ct N w U C c w J vl U c v' ro LLJ N 0 t O ,n 2 Y_ w t VI' 3 v v g m O 4= ai v s O LE C N W ,_ m e o v "� i W N v V -O n +� 'v Z i N U W UJ _cQJ "6 in W 0 +� C = _ O ns O N N i J QJ F- M Q C 17; O c o I c o '1- m II o p 2 a N v . Ozc � c t � cYc ~ w v V v di p t0 � ,,L e- Q ro m, Q 41 - 7 C I cc Q r Hi1 QJ ON 4J L1J• t Y O c � � v >.CD IA cu LL1 cc � Q Oc -accu on� a; oc v X Y Q v a: c 0 :+� MI O.. m cNi w m m a W F- Q •� `- u, -O 'C c o �' o v o c " 0 c c ov • c) ° Q Q . v° °n v °.. v, ° v c c,, v vv v N v Cl. 0 u r-, �4> 0 __.. ---.ear 1 tp `, NL r x to _ ill g� r _ J - w w 0 (li 1 ;F or < . #,-. , r !• IA O 1 k , _ • o �' Q Z Oi b — w 1 i -: Q ; r lb W � to I II v \' f J I NI oa ii. • �. qt.._14 ,T) x Q H I VI as W C i a N Z o c o v I H w CC J a) o — C31 N as 2 it Y N cn 1- = _ Y I 1/1 as V � ` C _c 112 a) •-0.1 m O W 4 '^ I- a, E Yv4 — h p O C 3 J .� c `xi N c c''' c H c 0 * O c�ia N O cc `Vn _ v Q u ral� kJ o VI � aE- 3 � oa Bcc a, rn a, v 4 I- F- a, ate, O � > ° vov3 �a a 2EEo v s U p c v c O Q E }, IA Lt J Y O N O r6 a l a 2 p , N i at011 0 w v 3 Z V +�N CL aJ ate+ C .OQ W c1 Z d o c2 E ro47c im v+ O a ¢ �o ill � -C cc > 0 J N Y a c v - - CO .o o a 0 C C 0 'Q +ara + +J to c O V 02N O Q • z a. J 0v La-J O ) 5- aJN aU - � L 73L V 3- v a) ay • Yi[ gn+ o kb `t o ria V V O V V j ,� 4z W Ai N y li 4., . v . 52 t... f>9 S 1 cp icr) ' Z . immaiv > WI to I -0 (,) ISEYINDI X kiii 2 , 0 I U.1 os, to e G _,=n� m Z o E I i-- j r �•e''' ` I W „LiW aAb crf a,--.. ----- -A r . . a ;i i >- u) > z Q a ee -4 Lii a _. L E oom 0 UI: crn° L_ {dam in1CT81T aQ i >Qi.l..1l ri.L4z"a Q 0 2: 'EL ), cc u.) ',',.. kJ fi i �li �U Q ill3 E- > "� m - C M - v6‘ \ tJ a 0 „ z-, i s� E J 1111 Q IMugmiTs le U..__J� t 7 ~ 1 I CI >mt o to a)`a Q JN +�a 2 co II II ! Tfl o v Zz0 IA sae >V mWN v,Qv 0 3 0 13 :✓ II >, os v aai > v o Cu i Qv o TO rO N L O Yi LL ►L W C O "0 L o :_ 3 �O '> Cl) l�6 •C to N Z ra T rp Z v 73 uu v L (1) a) ra v J m 4 Q '^ p -a v +, 3 cv >, aoc tat ,,, ro v _c 3 V m -a +' -a rn � •ry l7 rya +; 73 I. 3 � co o � oa, a I v v c Ufi Jet � a ( cv rn u o � oEo , J in o0 0 I— Q � -a = z D COC tea, o Q c a) o C C +. a, N - - . a c 47-1 +' o o ° o a � .o v, c a) Q a) 2 2 • +J rai +-. En +—▪ J C 0 to V Cl)L d U Caii vv a aE �°O Cl) V a L1 0• o oLo Vz -43 1 IF V I g . y2 �� �' af` ; p in etire 1 -� a f _ Q� U r a_ .g • cc G`.JL?.' V ` x is w-3 o t.� f 2 -a- m� w w �1�• IF -fir �Z N uaPieo_ d, - - p v Q W �- w= � I al,,,.,, L CTI:sli 11.ito Ebr _ Q is' & - \ o f >-. and o 1„, \ m 6a T _ �L1 .73C -1 Z li 17ww 1: _ , _ _ Maki � 4_ L. ��v Leo"� N auQ > I „, e rY re� �� �>l1� i Z'8 fb '�• N m< pt` - a�cdc6 �e 0 I '_ — • I. fY Fir Ju==_=_ - j--- aI— L..iii et --,_ c7) , ,c:?) LJ i C J_ `� c c EL N Q v a -� 0 3 I 11 v >. -a c c in +V CC W J V CD J 3 Z oY o• c -0 a, o L o I v 63 J U uH u su rarc a)3 7 co > i ,C V L ut C o Co-Q 0 Q > R r�C ,V O f0• d N �= U i 3 Q V a o >. -p L N L of ra N V W ro 0 - — 3 V VI L rU6 .- 0 413 p 4 W p *' 3 • j �. N Q >_ 0)-C O L 7 M V Q ) °i Y �p a! L 73 E " .Q N N ro t N 3H u, ov � � rho � Z ,�. �'*C Oct v 3 'v 01 a c 0.1 mso a 3Y - rnJ Yv 0 3 ' — u Qc = -o Loc a, LQ tea, a 0 � Cr; tn � o ia' vi a) o- � H Q vii V1 -0 p C -C C -0 C V1 •• +� C -0 In c 0 +'' O a.) o a C L.) o C = a- rt c6 - O 0 O a+ IA 2 v) C aJ -0 Q aJ ��1L1�77 L •_ E N _�47, J C 0 VI V � Q- U 0 L L v _. L N u 0 a aJ C N V2 [ 08 �^ V •r 9i �z W i ........ ... ... . a 9 ag sn...;•: ^/�i 'Jib@I ____,..--: `} • P� • �� � � �Qa, j� � J) -�, (-) r%` , ' \ .sE ..: \ F LLB_ cz t, • w . yy...e. ,... ,-ti.17:.; , '- _L:,„,.. 4t-1, _ -41-.,=,- ' ---Grirt((d1,77 fY Ck I41i • m � • o MEM '71 . �� � _ 41- � to Q Ary,1 70:7 lirrid-&-11 la:':'- "IL.—71 i ,. ri,-v-Tiii- - 4.;) \ .(j�p _ N _ cc I 9' • t ��� • 38.�71 -. _ V er. a i ' N"-- -;.--- A,111 . 1.7.'P.'---'-1 rli c\ '' ,(----,- . u �I 1 C pa CC a. h a_ v� Y W +`+ two m 1 it minZ ~ > (o °; CJCLIJ '0 >, z c � s w 3 > +; 43 V) L N - fC Ln ` a H h '76 13 ~ J voi v°Ji gi a) v47, o Otzt. 1W/1 +� O E = E c c O • o vUi o LJJ N i "p C Z N m co V1 Ou •� Q V a`-� a v a) fil _I Y CA CC cl) co a) oc a o 1 c O + O Q.) O a c ci)v O r = • — O c a. Q1 ` �j i •� ate+ 2+� a1•}, ---r C o ,n U a) d u c in O, . � O � Q O U av N V N � � O 0 V u z X `-. g4, w r� r W I /2 Of . ' '''.6 15) �� lsy ••a' r a Q Z = i _I• , r J =I:- Zn,s Y ,_,c. - � >� V1@aM r Z DCe ct ✓ J Ig�LEI i I] °J--.`lr___7_°>a'=___. U , I J 50 40 I d c s -y C _r__—_Ir—= V �f� __fit_._ a I bi Q1 J a_ N Q O 2 v Y v) D w -o v c V w v v v -0 'm 0 W = E `, I' w rn "3 >. �- O �[ H IL 2 Ex z tO �_ w V N UIn Na v `t ms L CC J O U V Q Crl 0 U >.Ks ++ O tC Q O ,, vOi 2 Et VI I- I E in vw CI- c ,kg 1 J1Iui tn H ^0 N C a) Lf1 C 0., O -0 cc - Y N 1- O > N O w I < - w I w = a a a m w V Ov, ci3O '' O v 0 Oc O r� - N -, En a.r Lr, +.+ O O N ..7 N a. b" c Q1 l . � if Q •O V a ,,,u' v 0 2 O p O a. 2 u u c p N V U ;, ` 2 w L ±-_-__J e 1 MU 4:----- i-7 r4z3 N ,\ _ .,‘..„_,---,. . kw mod, p _ _.. , \„ ..„., „... .,,._ : , ix ,,: - ; S any l a� n' 74- (•• �� I— " 1 • t --.' rm---, a_ OZ • `i2Mph 11 CI) * , ` At Z (n Q QC O - • r JrL_ : -- r WJ, j � , . , - 'C1 1141- . - NI L z 0 J - 1 W _ Oo , ° ra Z o c I a a Q IVY > 0 ° ns CU Le) IJJ Ci Yrls To oCU U W c c� � noC v� O m O v c `" °, �, � c � c a v /.. 01 ra c = 'c = 2 o > • ro c -0 1 \ > — 0 Yin c � •? V � Ln N '� c O v N ° V Q V .Y i+ t `^ i \ CI 2 O co c O° vi pl v p w 0 .,_, ra if, L ra vi O "O c O CC N 0 _c J V 'O Ov Q w H V1 Q 0 c If, -o • O c E O C O O1 K Z Ox. W v c ra Q aO2 N a a'N c > o t I a) a `^ c ' - a ,, .- , Q • w _c � a i CC 0 0 t c ra a) 3 3 Z � a w Z v -0 Q.i c 3 ° I— - -c E u a - V c Y a v J W c .- c 0 "a '. v D to O O L Y v 30Q .> racc -- > 0 0 °O co 0O Z a Z ci a m m OaO > Hm < < 4� v, t ,>. 0 1.. N W CO C v C Q c u o Z '� a, . , o '� o 0 a' ' o vr, c c v ts Qa 2 2 •_ ra • 0)•.,, _I C 0 l7 a CI- u c a ai . O O o •v, a, ° ° O1 A. n ° v v c o rift z j . v.. � 11 4.> w ___ ___ __ ! / 1 . I I. E .., , v • R 9L In J = n oQ 11 -.JS}^Y wY41 I'-'''35�.d� N 3 J3s Y411 1i O O ♦-4sn, 1 in 35 V VtY,9 it W _ W P,,• ]1 3S Y�eS --;\ in W W W i 3 tC' >Z O �•u a OC-I N if o ^ 3= •w - i PO* 11 0 6 '� u j Z�_ il iE V+ - cc as •- Q I ci W U ets v = V O 7 O p O e� N 4- - "6 N H N H N 'O G1 ra v-1 _ O w tp if, �. I 2 c O >, c a E u Z aj N o qi V o � 3 Jo ,_ °I o I- ys W pw Q O t cw O = CD `�' v in 'u^ vi Z O -am > -p acl) N Q � o u = a, O N ,n Q O H�^L "'I U u v � J ^ t v - � - E v c >, eecc cQY .a)210 > d ° w N o rn u < N cc c I Q a Z > - u in m a a Z w trI= � C ate- .O v O a C _O C +� O tin Y� O O •O '� r O N -6 L } Q Y 6).}c-, C O va °', L7 v a. u c cu L ' o v a " u a_ v a1 c cu L Jl • AbY a" 0 En W U u ou V z>r g, _ _ll — I _ 1 J { 3S a^y 4i•• tom,, ``° r ! , 3 { a S W ci rit L1 �" ^ 1 Cñiir Val _IJ1 IL 4401.- �Z 6 f 1a-� IT r 0 > w o W �, I co O ITC, L �1 z w N Q in cy W IY Q y ir vri 3S a^ 95L �y _11. m 1`- Iu1-.tin� 1 ' 1 a V 47tr)l sS I Q i ;D h� �(1j r '-') CY s� IA > z 3 o a 1t- I J� S a^t/41 zvl.; __] �� v a _ v, V1 ill= �� ! ,cam, �� ! t%f Q>w a 1 � to (� = W> In t7 EIDP14 \\% L _ Q � y 01 El i----T 8 1§ c 10 -' ufl - 3S any uoiu� >"' \ LT) 1 M la +^� t N cuc ru • v a M v a) a) CU ro w.. J +c-' ago aa) Q -, co N L ` 7 v O 0_ 0 7 a' 0+0 O 1 ll O N U a w Q U I -, m °?3 O io C t U t 0 m +� u UJ ' in ro v O ao u u _v W V O sn Q W tJ1 O vi ,. a a1 O is ' - >, ro racri O O a O it E v„ ea •C V a CC Ca '13� c U 3CCS J c t4+ Z C CO � OO a„ ca)Os 4Q N °CV O c O Z 'J v �, m o V co u W av O 03 O 0Lf, w O O d L � �'v U v Y N J J cl 0 a O E O >. m �Q Y N N cc OwkO � O u Q •— OC — a1 W s a � v� � N V in m a2 � m Q u m G , Zo`— - z3 c c '0 c v. ,,; +-' c O v, w c O 0 a) O a c L.) 0 c c to C 0 v 0 } a `A =a., a u + 4-, 0). —I c O 0 ai c '-2 is v ; i al v v V aO v Ol ♦ vOY 0 soc V 0 icVU z 1� ¢4> w iN Y ��tii W up a E• ilk .+ , a s', -' .I i " i' azu., OYZ z_��- r i T . -IF j' .:'S'*--:::_i;:- 0 sz. _.,. \ WW -1_-7, 09 . 57 ri 1 I =mow a I (� ce! L Q W to Y > V 711411:r71-1 r-t Ct At/ g i J Z �a , n ,, ;bs 41;^i p o o_ p v ,j, _ fn -�1 F 3 Li, W J t_— 1 �; W aYa 71 tg tr. -----I J In y �l enV • U :OI .��33 i uo 0 itiz: - - W f 5� ; �' 1 �J _ E .EL C_____,-_ _(7) -1'-`-- - V5 4 V Y tUUUJ El- M Z ,_ v rn aJ Q V 0 v v w J + 3 ' -0 W -0 C p 3 v = " 0� 0 Z +' v+ _ ui t•.jOC 0 H C cn4- cc: I `a E Z N c d— OZ cn E '- CL) _ cOv,W LI—,._ 1 y Q w -0 V c0 c0 01 c0 c0 W Z cu oaOaWm 'v a O ; Q O O Q- Vo1= 7v, Z cvi- � ':4 Z p v Cr) 3 v c0 E a', W Os vl Lt a) vi. 1— ...7,OZ N N c0 c c MS Q IA Q d ate-. O CV V �ONH J t L p p v >, c v = O Q w O v, a) Lis d Z Y V N Q p Y C .V m m ccwa 3I— m < u > -to c _c c -o c u} '- c -0 tn c c O +' 0 CU O a c u O c c Q .5)-- J "6 O vvi 0 N Q. u c r10 Lil -0 v v V Cl_ v c a)Ol * AO ri O O c O c V V z 0 . 4 {� '. Ll r 1 o kg \ it U1 3 -LIN_ i__--a I Ianifv `77 w -- � . O 1 �m ❑C7L} JEJL)UJrhi �_ 8°.� � a I c n: w w O ijr r I� 1 i iax 8 C� �o� �- 1I Q Q 1 -.54_ ._, ..,—Au-,-,,,,,, _ ,i__ ..„, ...,. a ,,,,, (--,,I,„: .....,...,„ . ,,,__, 0,--,,.._±:- _ _ -,-,..., o > i _i_ e 0 ,__ Lcy-- 214 v"--17-: Z I' i I -I .,_ I Ee_ r,,p_,,,,.., ,r7r.ip, ).C.?.•,-_- VI. . ii Elitip.:piegv 1 I 1 I� ` ,.A.;, J t c N r i 1 v • . U J BaN VJ w U 7 Q sQ a uaP J m_ I am ai,i�� � /1 lA 3 5 N r r ..c.. 0 I( K C v Y N � C N MI M O v -� �' �c o L +�+ CN v '� O rrp �U,, '2 CV �^ ,�i, G i ea u +-, u H W W -0 +� V c -° au v +.. o ,., Cr) Y v, 0 v Q� z N N r"a "a p ri1:1p N > OoN � N �c � v, -a cc a +, 0c 1 k (i) E> VN o � ° ta) c c av,' rnEv u a N N (NI O L a) .- ro m 0 'SV � rn p,-> v, ra o13 co c v, = c v, \ O � LLi Cr) N VI IA CO C C N �' =0 p •U vY co t6 1 aJ .0 rC N �, aJ .Q i i I— y�j W t C v n O a�1 v v c c 1- c C Y >°- v Y -° c c a oc O v, t.O l o J _ Y a aci '^ 'afa Q N w o c u O 0 10 v Q I— a°Ji occ es rn N t Y rc6 z o uO 3 C � � � ° 66 N O i v `�° f° v vai rn v ,ii VI = 15. — o W a v 0 u x c -aJ f6 +, rno 111 a' t O v3 a� c a) >s = •c -0 Q v c c vl u CC o a N N rvi CC 4-I in m a N 2 I— Q Y _J .- cc c ... Z N W -C W O o c c 'o c N +� C ro rt 75 c " o cC cv o "CC p CO + o O ,, 4.V i6 7_ ° u O _ -N p U �NC r j U ,a)J vi -0i a •— a =Ov v 0 v, Q v, _ooQ a c °O �Oi a 0 cw U V IMMO 4,¢ 60 _ i 1 35 vv;PI __._ \ E i - u, 5 \ Q J ' i i k n to 3 f ea _ a` E O rittS{ , g i 4, _.. --. O 1 , t f -.r _...._. In E it E J g > ,IZ,..„, . 1 _-v '----E- i )- to tu < -4 E _ : : w.. -- I- r if CZ -r WI 1 „( i O� j E IA s 1 10 in '. WI O rd CZ 11 E --;__ III N 1 > { V9 O E . EQI , I 1 14' If4cc -I , I —I w s a ` 23 I LY v v u c o c t L Q.) cx 4—. VI CC �C Z o > V ac, +6 —' t° v u v aJ 0 N O I Y C i2 u"O ` CO i aJ > al LY Z IA v ,`o u " c lJ ,o f6 Cl) U N CL w o Cl) = 00 C .5 co Z L °c Nc. �, o RV u+ 3 o u �, 14 W a r.iT w � vN o � � � v v 1 Qj Q Q1,1 CC c cc fa N N LLIV O LA a1 a• O 7 '� C = d S N 0 a1 O O O O u O ~ 2 •- fa To "a V co) 4J O — ix _ C > O NE tp ++ 'p "O cC in ro Y o v Z v O r0 O a)11" p v l7 in aJ > . w V u ro Z > a, rn c �aQ t a) au o_ rn — a C co U w Y p1 tii > -0 C N a w_ id) N as N M C •'� • Y U ).60 -2 < � Q i O � O> v w � Y aw m m uUa >- 1- •= < -c°0 3 > -DI i�i, z C O I 0 v O O- c o c c Q if) C QJ al iCL U '- •i + 2a) v) av U � v 0 in C, a of �G ° = v U C o z , w qfqfj 3z ii 4 S$ W J c a,x s Ss {p J — g (1)! i F c. r $ W W W .gmm a - QQ mmmmmrrmmmmmm.it ' s j F N A::---) .1 t - 4--:.-)ti- OMR fF s +-- —i 01 o . g _ b. OM Fj V `s'1 >z o N I g 1 i; i CC II I F v a = a _ s , Q • —k 7, a ,r Y a 03 a >' -�' Q lit c ' N rp , W a)C ra d M Z C C a) rC L QJ Q a) o _nC t0 C -0 J Q c '^ c 00 ra r. W s mD Y a) Q _c ii; +J a� — , c (0 a) L z t13 °1 a w `) t °' °J al °' U ra 0 ;a c .a W ?� v � 4 = Ls c O p Y j I s -0 o a.c t co I- -a v '0 ' •� >, m - O ro i 1- qi � Ip N Q°0 > a 05 Ln��° c o ° � I o aDQ = a -o 7o o 2 1 C I � �' � f6 c 1 F— VI 0) Z = � 0 1J o 01 z N to m _v rcovoi Q- N = NQ N U ' 0 a D o `C > >, ccDJw ) �o v N a I- 1° o 2 mO Q' m - F- I Tti I-- mini Q +., N - W -o c c 73 C V, +' C 73 " + C O 0 a)N O �- C v O C CO Q ac ° a C o r1 L7 a v c vW +, , -' 4-, o c - • O � c � CA, - o ° O 0o U vO o 0 z N v v Y_, v " s= (J mZ _ Q �.. "� z 4 to3 I P,k:-.;:,,,s'_,. D �� 7, O v •t ' w W Z_ O 1 D • I'. l_; `s w I < J 1 i I IL j D o -`rC ` on ' `j Z B __ 0 0 Ti p J _ i > Z ZO _ _±IPM abot Ra ( _inns', �� • `�--' ��\�\ V1 02 cc o gany cntn°c •,,may-_ i,._ V II. ' v o= 'Ty. - Ilr \ - J pJ Q � Q CD to 1 a j Ifli to1.c ei �� '�rnv= a, i a) p I u Ce `i1 .p U O o -a v L^ Y �, a, a +� +� u o p c c o ai I.N, Z o a, o °J oc � `_' Q ra �: W s C C O v Y t L- 0 0 IA r: ro O m v ra +' v +, a, •� ''0 Z z° t N o a,N � � a 3 � a W p 0 +� .� O OH ^Q mns aZ 70vv = vo Q L O r6 of CO W 2 t4 aJ = -, a1in •C O ^n c aQJ � JiQW v °' p, +J112 -C E a -c '_E as E C _1JJz = j.E v v a� v, a> >, W X r0 a > O ro i V ou T O O O O 1 a Z � o a m m H H m c Q 03 u 2 aaaa v, c _c c '0 c v, +' c -0 v' O - 0 a� O c•• a, O C C iiilco ro •+� c .. (CS c4J 6 V a C O OiN +� Oa i . ror 6 4+ a1•47, J c p vi U a u CQ • O 11 CD tevV a N Cr O N a, Ol � 0 a 1 1� VO a `C oC 111. F a. OC a z N U U co- it L :�_ —�,.`, �� .� FLU'I�" Q I 3 �` a$any (' an n <.�H • N • co. . .. nq a �_ z w 40._ ti� - C Q J 1 ___,._, A2.1." ww �� flialLyr.. ; 34r,‘76. _ rl `s���uU_ �Z fir PAS ( ] fi-- n l ct,„ )- _\ w a I ii V J.Il`°� Q w NYQ > °DI-� ^H419tt nr�•^,r t I QCO 1- 11 �a , \ t �51�--^-ts L Ju l Y� j_ �� Q 3 W= J W II 3N `V ull1' J`Tirl w • logo I W N 1.0 Ya i ,i.-_-_ L CE Ask, 1, I11 in v� a r , 11, :. 1,,,ii tg m o w J 2 t' ' 4 cc �c�a V Si z Q a^V"� Jr It, L o n J a � m a Y a 1 7 Y m V Q e 3 Q ' a \F di I EL ICC , �.t> L LLI M ill 44 a p, o a a 2 iI m � l� o'er >. Q► CC ' a .x -6 ID 2 a LJ a0_ a �° vJ M 0 m +; V -a o u- 2 0o Q v >, _ 3 O o v, ra N }, _ a; p j �, v' 'o >, N >,•- l _ • ~ ate,, 4-, N •4 N LL Ti-, O ,- .. > Lr, 0- 0 O 3 la) J > >C + Q V} Q D a O p ro >>� s R w = O o = i d of O O, ++ �i N V a C O a _ 4 a W a v Y N o o a a � n 2 3 ° v � 5c° w v I 4. _ •_ a O N Q N >N a > O 7 CL ` a U Y = a +I J J rC in O O O °c = >, Cc a) = Lu a .i CO CC w M a, v < Q-V a CC Y = co CL v, M (/1 E0 CL 0 v, E 1- E Q a ccI- O CC 0 LPL •- O O 4-. O a o H VaO v, CL u =• 1- ro v • N 4-, U v 2 a� = N ZS OI ` • AY +' U V O V z V ill 0 . 81- ? i v Q i ' ' '' CI IIf . - , ��`�" �S 7n W z o :".' :,4),," /// lII1 JZ cz, �� W= W . . rg,d )_ Ln Q W t�Y rile zi, 9 1pty� 2 3 w w -J w 921 \ .,/ 6 U1 9 A$ ly .7:..'.'-' lik OtAl ...E LL� i O .1. h �� MM p I 0. / 2 a , N a 3 --Vi S ` ~ W ___ 711n2__ c 0 w ra vZ Yo_ av cc ( •4_, ‘,., _. c a., 2 _ Qv W > v v C v co _C a1 x_ 2O > p1 II) — v N v >, c v m e v c �. Gi W N w a a) Y 0 -p 0 U N m to 7) v Cl) w U c - Om v x_ C V �J Z v, ro '^ � W_ ro -o 1 (11 c 0 U -p 0 ra Z A > O v) 'v t= Ili a 0 O v � C rn z o c p Z a, a, O � � tn •vou ° 4 0 0 _ >_ w C O c O }' c VIiv �Z ON I cc 14‘; a, v, 3 Z w In c ro — In ,� J J i O OU = w c ? < rcoccY 0 cal .a, iCl- to ni m oo a 3 F- co Q .c v, 0 c _C c -0 c o v; 4-, c -p v, " n c o o Cl) o a c " o c c ° o • o17, 03 o c c a a v 2 v 2 •- to ,� J c p u L7 U c ci v O v v U a ; a v ♦ 0 a10 0 0 f �. 0� \0 ._ Y U U o 0 'r gr z . t� 44` w i v to 4 k ON11 \ w s ., ey" t)3 ram=, 1 .i ,3s O Lcs ._.� -_�� , Vic. , �3s rwr v; 4. WP iwcr''- ( i — rrtz ,, . , ., u► //�I I -' y_,,,.., „,) ,,__, , , .._,1 v/ i z N Q I Z 3 H OI r l c r w w I - ,_,,,,,„, _ - S I W ,.,i w � , ,__, - -,c,„_,‘,...7„ ,.., , _ , , . ,4, , s.„ „ \,\___ u tr ,_ I i ( rqU---1- i-j--- --1.v-- --- -1-11- 3=- 4 1,-/ U1 ILI Li, c. -, I I` 2 N,,,m q "; Y G --,, 111 =Ee @ .mac 4 w� II a $ii Sax 11 a 11 ,-,ws`rvrim : to any \ ^ . 0 R rA -- �i -J I $gam `� \ C v � ', � QN v � vv > a) , WCC u eL ,� C t`p QQ plo 'C v 3 c — = u •- aJ W /t �, to a 'in 70 CC co *� cus 0Ivv m O Q 2 >. C v om , y �' r6 E 0 ro c C a.) cc C V1 'j �^ \ Z W a) >, .c N 3 N u 0 n [6 Q Z 3 ,__.,-A V�1 J Y U t a N Y v v tit CC z O v o 2. 0 v Q- u- 2 _c > c CU c v 0 Q v v� � Ql vo (Is v IOU 72 liii 3 O N ,� rn in ~ X > Ti: 01 0 Q a� z C v ro j W tn < in Z 'm aa � H Q 3 'u c L Co +� oH Q. c " o u co vi CC v L •o �+• En•+, —I C Cl.) o � u V a t„ a) C a) z .X Y I - '- =Tr cc�-���(�� v a Ft� ii,kWir• m., �'i++ \ to e Li Za/g `,l $ �� 0 3 Y z z 1 P QV —Ti f i - �:Vim•' ._._.= J d Y _ p� m C bc - �� AL JZ NWT �'' 3 f'L W= a N �a� it mi Q�W Eli I '�; € Q W N a y any F, •"11a ..a I ,t TO- W •E r 2 53l \�i 7 � Z +— J ILI Z gym_ 4 a I O 0 Q U a - '_ IuE _ _ 3 cl w z w - 1 ULJIcc 0 S,.n�e lbn s V - Q>w of 1� �11. .]�_2 °i°- W w a > i 1 Rym;Bt Ave N N g 8 LL m N u a n /r ac �e5 t (D � u ` O� ���_ 1 L[ r� JJ��G tL �J !m ~i � V Y a 0M \fp cb:1_, s., telJtj ,_Ini u) [ ct \ • Q j01 L1�_S y 8 1—( _ `� \\ a w 2 F T) 1 C AokJ ^ o_ d' co a) +, I is ou o V) w = o — `n 2 'I J rn i d uNQJ II WO L p , k. T U N o 2 .� ++ — v,V C +�+ (0 t0 c Y t °'V o v`� a1 Ln a) 4,iii Q af°i � I Q >;1= o v •u c p v) a, I fi u vip oQ v a,w IIL ��c I i co cu v, -0 c _c c -0 c ,,; c -0 = c o o a) o c o c c —411 v) VI c n v y 'y --Ic v l� 0_ U .+ ra c i i c VI •— a) vOv U a. a) a L O a O 0 Y •�, O v z x_ U .O r GCS__ — W ooyy��; NIA= J _ EmerF �Nm $a • s ve Ranier A t . .. ''�� P`' tu o ��•• y try/�� It Q \ O 4v L. -IL— ums :fir I F'/ ... 0 = _ J O w c =t P ��� _ (T W e I c as •r c a Q " o I v I- I- � v d, Q as n cc O +�' cc m V1 'a) w rn •a a I Cgg V1 in p C N i Vra _ C tb ! a ' o Q' a1 v� m L D > CC N L.• > +-' ra c ns co IT)Tr > — U 0 v Q — ns w L. U Qj Q Y a a•`� �p J i a • I Ft o Q V T. rnin vin Nu c �lO1 'cc ai 4 H >. c v E a Nra - �-0 � � > u c o -a caaZ � YaU I ra >_ a p C CC a a) - T Ji 0- a a. c aa) v a� o Y co -a c -I 0 -a a c o Q 'a es O. -a oc a a Cl) in - D cn a 3Va 'rn3vH C o ' 0 �a 0 a C u o c c rc `° � �' ov o 0 •o � � o Ln c c a a as 2 2 . III I '�•4, -J c o ' l7 v a c ,- L a v a a) 0 a. I. c a)ao c u u ii I --, -- d:Tii , ,- . . . ' s ,?_H- --- : _,_. -- id $,,_ , k Ili it 2 , ,,,..., ,- ow r mob` II iin -. /4 k' Li) 3S ii ,...v' L =I � - _'. ' in IIN � - �I I ,U ■D nT / 3 c. qa l F. lL Q J I- p nn II r / 3seAvw o `L� ' ° ���F-- \ Vs / fat c,z it ju 0 �h�jii- Fin E/Zgl larlikOf [_4..iii-D , , .w w i I its, 'li , „ ' All, Alk tA . , <Tr r c. w m � J, 0 Iii iti191: : i o "' ov a • 2 ',/ n r. d Va Q3�Q WZis) li!.I il C 00 -I - Y Ce I— V F- Co f 0 O (13 `' p `' Y _° +- Vy -J N V ,� V U1 lb .. .� Y (0 � 0Y 0 C O I +� 0 N _N CD in cc C'' N CU s O ut CO ` 3 >+ Qi V �. a` > t O vi (0 > CT v N C a N 0u s ac rts Cfl ^Q O O a) N a) fp C IA 0 O f0 f0 {/I cn 112 U N a _Ca a V 2 "O N U Vf o N O '(p .� CD Q1 0 Y o — O ++ t%i ,�, t i N �r- N v�i a) O N i i C) C it 42 4- O v vl ;, a) I C r0 OC a1 > O C +� `� 0 H w -p N N 2 kr, v v`ni N 45 v ++ E C p v C O C O d +�+ co N N r`6 tu u Y V J4-4 • O - a) >. OC Y .. L N N cc N O u? Co a`+ 0J V < f0 N d- OC C X O •_ O aJ 1 a UN v- Cl- IA vl m aaw .- I— - w -0oc a s -a C .0 C C •ir; C -O vn D C O 4 CD O C L.) 0 C C 4- .� y N .,, - O a) .. O co C �p C O U O O ,a v, +-+ Lri c? 4- Q1 a 4J U +.. (p +-' 5'+_� --IC O v., t-. a) U a) F ._, Q) 0 a a- v fi vv,_ A ,_ , Poll_ . II i , .,,,,/,2 41 g a " w d $6 # 0 0 I .II --o 1; t Q 11.1 _ CI 1 CV Ili i V ••'•• ® ' O > ! Q > w /p3 > „Th illilli rt- NW ' IfG _ t :� � t N J ' G-! 9 I , A.,. >. m , .., I �ru � tis tz ,13 � � rn �I a) 1 W 0 p coo O a) til � '1 ,y = c . -0 o L � CO al m v vi o °' 3 17v w � o a Q ,ns '^n v + Z v a) ,n 2. v1 a) v m0 CC o C Uc c � � 7 } °` CD O cc in fr, N ru 4E. Z = pu 3 71 W 1.6, ". J - >, •- ai ro Y T, v a O +, c 3 0 J Y d Q p 0 O vi I - ro lJ -a ns O �o -a v ca a, o +r a) c O Q N co p C. �� p aJ j N O v 0 Q . p , 0 in t/f V `n pl ns n' = +' i =� v�i U c I cr W 0 Y v to 3 � � a� ? � w a� �t p w v t vi Z L c Q is Z 3 v+ - N a lJ v o v N v N •C p - J (0C c C v Y co E To c r9 •�Q ,L v �o _ E O0c O O 7 i v N < (0 O Q, c Y p •, r6 = v - V cc N cc in m Z a Z Oc i- m Q -p J U 15 Vi -a C -C c "0 C in 4-, c -0 n C 0 }' 0 a1 p 0_ C l O C c A. v1 C C N .p Q v O } O Q '44, r6 r.,, al• J C p ,r, l� N d U C '- L 1 a) v a u U a v c v L6 L OS � ``O o O 0 .O o = O 0 a i C V V C p o � z •x j .. .c...r _. 111 _ ,,,,_._._. I I Y Q 'IL------ -3s s `---- ; ow 3S a44, UJ W +. err lar;_ rr-�ow I— % L-1 J R al, 3 Y W Eli I— i `, - Q . Z_ 1 € E ,,,, ' Z I O E ii , ..., t J >=w > o 0 ic_T� . W W s - V V`1 , z I W I111 I _— S�L�— � v U Q • i /ne► �� ' as env mi, �` W 4- w = _7a ,,, _ Q > w . ' ifii: . It-V: i--1/11 --7 ZFinniTliT _-11 %-r-i'- a) 1— _.. .A. v,.. .„.......,, • , _, i� j'j G " -t , ...7 pal_ r V o i a 1 . ( ,r 1 .� Al_� o I = a cn 21 --'t- : -4. '!�La] 5^w�,�., h ,,g�, H 1 • Natural Resources Building �� °� • ; ;�V\/ (360)902-3000 1111 Washington St SE • "' �; , TTY(360) 902-1996 pi WA 98501 U Y. OI m is r' Fax (360)902-3026 tJ PO Box 40917 E-mail:E-mail: info@rco.wa.gov Olympia WA 98504-0917 Web site:www.rco.wa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON • RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE RECEIV5D March 5, 2010 IA* 112510 C OF ROti SER tG Leslie Betlach COMMW"tom Renton Parks Department CITY OF����� 1055 S Grady Way 5th FL MAR 8 2010 Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Betlach: RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE The Projects Division of the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) has reviewed the ' Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and finds it meets the planning requirements as • specified in Manual #2, Planning Policies and other related manuals. We are, therefore, • pleased to inform you that your agency is eligible to participate in all RCFB grant programs as listed on the enclosed report. Please note that this eligibility applies to a limited geographical area for the grant programs indicated. • It should be noted that to retain grant eligibility in future years, it is essential we be notified of . any major amendments to the plan as they occur. Your plan may be used in the evaluation of projects submitted for. grants. An incor-rect_or-incomplete plan may impact your project's evaluation. - • If we can be of further assistance relative to your park, recreation, or conservation planning program, please feel free to contact me at (360) 902-3009 or e-mail lorinda.anderson@rco.wa.gov. Sincerely, (gtvot".4 Lorinda A. Anderson Resource Planner • Enclosures • • 7/.Z.J3/0 LCA cjim ,f f W/ f ocfu GT .111 rn6(IMa11(k . Pw Ad,n7) 6 a vv . C ; hi e K/r'�L >�i/g at Rer it vi Tri ls a-�ec 7 eta Pl0_42. Recreation and Conservation Funding Board 0 Salmon Recovery Funding Board•Washington Biodiversity Council Washington Invasive Species Council•Forum on Monitoring Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health ° '° Governor's Salmon Recovery Office %AO D10 Plan Eligibility Status Renton Parks Department Plan Name: Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Adoption Date: May 11, 2009 Plan Restriction: trail projects only Expiration Date: May 11, 2015 Primary Contact: Leslie Betlach, Renton Parks Department Waiver Date: Secondary Contact: • Eligible Programs: Land and Water Conservation =NOVA Nonhighway Road bc),ie I NOVA Nonmotorized d`ea'-i RTP-Education qr°a `C RTP-General WWRP-Trails VVI 2010 Planning Deadlines for Grant Eligibility Comp Plan Program Final Due Date Land and Water Conservation Fund Program June 15, 2010 Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program June 15, 2010 Nonhighway and Off-Road Vehicles Program February 15, 2011 Boating Facilities Program March 01, 2011 Ineligible Programs: Boating Facilities-Local Boating Facilities-State NOVA Off-Road Vehicle WWRP-Critical Habitat �V WWRP-Local Parks �p� �2��� WWRP-Natural Areas WWRP=Riparian Protection Ccri O`N S RS CeS WWRP-State Lands Development . COMMUN WWRP-State Lands Restoration WWRP-State Parks WWRP- Urban Wildlife WWRP-Water Access • • ORGPLANS.RPT March 05, 2010 Page:1 May 11, 2009 Renton City Council Minutes Page 139 Utility: 2009-2010 Mosquito Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a sole source contract in the Abatement Program, amount of$53,315.55 with Whitworth Pest Solutions,Inc. for the 2009-2010 Whitworth Pest Solutions Mosquito Abatement Program. Council concur. CAG: 07-072, Central Plateau Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-07-072, Central Plateau Interceptor Interceptor Section 2,Rodarte Section 2; and requested approval of the project,authorization for final pay Construction estimate in the amount of$8,175, commencement of a 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$103,163.47 to Rodarte Construction,Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Corman presented a report regarding the City of Renton Trails Committee of the Whole and Bicycle Master Plan. The Committee reviewed the City of Renton Trails Transportation: Trails and and Bicycle Master Plan and recommended that the resolution regarding this Bicycle Master Plan matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Community Services: City concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve a contract with MAKERS Center Community Plan, architecture+urban design in the amount of$34,350 to assist in the MAKERS architecture+urban development of the framework plan for the City Center Community Planning design Area. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES RESOLUTION#4005 A resolution was read adopting the 2009 Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Transportation: Trails and MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Bicycle Master Plan j / RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. b The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 5/18/2009 for second and final reading. Development Services: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 6, Street Utility Standards, of Title IV Contractor Liability for Street (Development Regulations)and Chapter 10, Street Excavations, of Title IX Repairs/Maintenance (Public Ways and Property) of City Code, changing references regarding permits from the Public Works Department to the Department of Community and Economic Development; to specify the requirement for liability insurance as a permit condition; and to extend the duration of maintenance bonds from one year to two years. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 5/18/2009. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:18 p.m. frit'ue; ' &a Bonnie I Walton, CMC, City Clerk Jason Seth,Recorder May 11, 2009 a a May 11, 2009 Renton City Council Minutes Page 139 Utility: 2009-2010 Mosquito Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a sole source contract in the Abatement Program, amount of$53,315.55 with Whitworth Pest Solutions, Inc. for the 2009-2010 Whitworth Pest Solutions Mosquito Abatement Program. Council concur. CAG: 07-072, Central Plateau Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-07-072, Central Plateau Interceptor Interceptor Section 2, Rodarte Section 2; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay Construction estimate in the amount of$8,175, commencement of a 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$103,163.47 to Rodarte Construction,Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Corman presented a report regarding the City of Renton Trails Committee of the Whole and Bicycle Master Plan. The Committee reviewed the City of Renton Trails Transportation: Traills ander and Bicycle Master Plan and recommended that the resolution regarding this Bicycle Master Planre1 jG/ matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Community Services: City concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve a contract with MAKERS Center Community Plan, architecture+urban design in the amount of$34,350 to assist in the MAKERS architecture+urban development of the framework plan for the City Center Community Planning design Area. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES RESOLUTION#4005 A resolution was read adopting the 2009 Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Transportation: Trails and MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Bicycle Master Plan RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 5/18/2009 for second and final reading. Development Services: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 6, Street Utility Standards, of Title IV Contractor Liability for Street (Development Regulations)and Chapter 10, Street Excavations, of Title IX Repairs/Maintenance (Public Ways and Property) of City Code, changing references regarding permits from the Public Works Department to the Department of Community and Economic Development; to specify the requirement for liability insurance as a permit condition; and to extend the duration of maintenance bonds from one year to two years. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 5/18/2009. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:18 p.m. a.U2 Bonnie I Walton, CMC, City Clerk Jason Seth,Recorder May 11, 2009 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT [ate May 11, 2009 City of.Renton Trails and Bicycle.Master Plan (Referred May 4, 2009) The Committee of the Whole has reviewed-the City of Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and recommends that the resolution regarding this matter`be;;presented for reading and adoption. • • • ;Randy Corman, President cc: • . • ,--.•I- al • Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary • ' l.esli .&-Hezch, Par Ks Di rcc/oma kci rR At AI r z Overview and P Y 15,4 gN v • 2006 Federal grant for bicycling guide map & b c planning document k ,.,:i iti,‹ .., „ t,...... ,...„,,, ,P' t • Update of Park's 2003 Trails Plan •1:4,, Plan integrates bike routeplanningand trail *i.,- 1 „-.0.,:l planning into a single master plan !, ,,, ..,,, '4, 4,..,,, ,,,,i. , ,,,, k i ,: ,:,,,,,, .. ,,,, • Builds on previous planning • Identifyhighpriority routes • Identifies what we currently have and a vision for the future 2 ri,:,::, S tA *4;sl tr S �ti Vision Statement „."... .. . aa .. s a.TNa It The Bicycle and Trails Master Plan creates and fosters opportunity within Renton and neighboring 5 communities for people to move through the city and ft;t,.‘„, , , � to access multiple local and regional destinations pg �� � �t including schools, parks, businesses and residential areas. 1 `otThe master plan supports a city where residents and 111,,,,, visitors can enjoy recreation and exercise contributing to a healthy lifestyle, and where commuting by bicycle using an integrated trails/road network, becomes a realistic transportation alternative. 3 • . . 4t--%„...;,,-• ' •-Nistek.4.-4.,..,.-- ,,k444.:FiXi tcHieale.42s afe' i'lc(lc ail'V:4,91e..fl'' Irlls...asti.82 s!'•`,.:--,::':;:''''Is::: .4"..41.1 ...;44:111' tatilthithitY' id 1 , ::-.'h6:i neighborhoods hb...0rhconnectivitytlOd '..an.ti, pecit..'destinations, ,,,,,t .,:•04,.=1:siti .. ,, 1:i" '1network that Provid„:64.bp.th, ' '' ' .* ';: .J21' f.::',•,.' ‘10,,...a''.'t o'n'd;re. gipn.alti?ri,nttivity. , .k, . • ''',":it4,t.r:17°. ;',,,.,44.7,k1. '%•••44,.. '•--ktoir,?,•°:,,, r6n riiict neiitiiii:t.fil:ipOit,..41#'. ' 4,1'4- ....,•:•`,. , 111174: .,... :-... :-Y-• diZinaionsyschr41s,p*ki,4112b140t1197, ':.,,,,',,,•,,,,,,,, ..._- , ,,,,,,r77-. .,„. ...... ---, -,c.iv c .0.5,P— .:„,....,• .‘„- . ... ,2, ...4, ••• c:.1e.*:44,,y,k , , ridbuler1001,,dotiqns,, , „.,„::, •" . • . •:- .:„.- ,„.....„ . „ .,. tesdetyforles,..5Killeo. ,. ..,f • — . . . .. 4 4.^—....‘4t*'V. ' —''''"4'• emphasiz n route. „• " sesi.......1.f;•,,.,...... r, :„...,.............,..... - ."4`.7e'4'4'..:',.',,' • -ii 1 42t4ts," l'...'t. '.,x,'4),.• g." :.',„....,-..?.?r . • at3t,,—;vw, - I ' „.." ' ' ', ,,,i...:6:',74: . . ••#V-,,,:::5:77,..tiii,...---... --:':-.:-.'.'t, 111 ,el,:..„.,,,,L.,-..- • •..'•A-4, . c,..E.t.•4,-.. „, ,r-r,- .... , _ ,,,. , . ., .. t " commuting routes connections....,.. , ,,,o. 1.2at.,i,al;.s:fit71ith-trilnstt. :::!,,,,,,,:;;‹,m.• - convergence Ofrc,9 .. ,....,,,.,,,,, ...:.„.,,... .,... . . - .N .,.., .,..„... 1 ',Nt.'ai; '' '''•"''"I' - beveppcommuting routes between,', ' 'IA'': I.'" " ; • ;Al :- .• :iiei6liborrtO-ods,-eemployment a.iriO,'... 11,; , buiiere r ,„'' ..,.- ' liti6slhat ' i$ .'t ;'‘and 1.rinO::F:t9 !.,- ' - . .`rti,1:1-.• ' -. „„t''''''''':„,•:.-7....''.:4,;•4' 4:.,.".„.4- 4-,,Is,ilic 1,,v:litil:icgrnnlbdate.riidretkillect nderiisiser5, 1.7.:1.......-!..:--:;,•:,?--.-„,,, ,...„0.. tr .• ' „ s4,*:::.".•?V.44 •' ''''''' '''''' ..` a,'-.1 4 ;, , ,.ctaako.ti.tatwa1:z:h.0mrk:;,;(10:,,,,hpirve-e,,mtic:,inc!vthe:re,mii _,,r 4-c:-..4.:.. ,,.,.'„, ,,-, ‘,'t • '—- Lia "Tril in Aentori and 111.;1' .--'' '' ' '' ' andili'r14r 'JI' t ' 'regional • -,.,"--- - .,,.....4 t.'. ..':• ,-,, ,',,:,” ,', enhance the connectivity 9 the , ,. , . -,,, , - • .,:.ieg.. 7';'•;'-w-Ha- -t- 7-t:-'7.1. ' :trailel- network by aafingonrtecte.iii I;,4.Y. %,:r1.,,,..,re,t.?_evz...,,,,, ,„-,•,-..‘- t: 4.t'Lt.•'''''' '. • 1'4'A''- - ' ' irrtate.'pa' 41004 lir:•pits-=.'t,4 ci:e, rtiti%,i,,f, : ..„ 1 _I.....,..s:,•,..c. ,,.., :,,,,,.,,,..:.. 4.4.''.'•iii::-A ,...''"i ...",!:'.,..... prp„ .:._,. •Lake,.....___,Trail, •„,,..,'14-.-.• ,•.-. . MIL Soos,cropf kTrail, < Torg,sia ''- ' ''' '1;66 SThriTflTrIsh",T!'alf:'-' ' i',.,-,•;:t '• ' ' '-='1,- ' i ‘", 414-- ' '',4', ' ik.E*-•" skN 'Y'el • '''' )43 nel4h4oriitg,00mmut4 , '• ‘,...,,,•.2.., - - , ,,; , . . .. >•. . ' 2 ES'' 't,.‘v.'.-1•,' _ C.mommom : , gi,ri. .,. s,V,•354,!.-.1' . . .. „ ' 1'' '- •:-r'r.R, -14*- • ' .:44.•••:,1'.' 1.. - r .k.:EZ:v4',,,";,,3‘lf•ro*" :4,'" . ••„4- .,..........-,pit.„. i ,,,,,44.E;)f744,,,.A.:;d4tit-• .2_- -----------'—------—--.,.,_ •;4754....0:;:•,,..,---........T.,.. .!- . •..---7--•- 17. althyli estyles, . . . ..- ,- - • -..-•-s•: --''--• -- improved,. ,„• •,,,.•• ,...,,.-,- ., 1.. " - air i.,,,, , .7, -4,,, '....ri atiural0 ha4hy fite:sti, ,le,s,,tii rOU 01i - 1::,..,,,,,,.1,,„;,,,,:i.,,',.,:*•:. , ,,: ,c1 -• -..',4i... *.,.e•,- ,viailog,:ar.d tAking, r0 tlisteoj3fqr.tun,:y "ii,experience and en,f9ilidttir7 , ..,.. , . . ,..,=.,,,..,......:;,...4.„ •... . • ,...„'' i.' t”-l „.` io----•i•..„•„..-„. ;.„.•,,,...'r:.:,.4,i,,.,,,,,.,,,,A .,,,z,„.-."4* 4 air.qua, ,, , - e iriiio gild tae tions iii.‘***1 .coy . . u zngandrecreational' 44, i'i • denti ttoiiieri ni .a d.Icoca1'an :# destination .ir .a trail` nd icy network, ,a • i µfor`b th'c m'rr muting arc[ ecrea ion F 'purposes':-- ' L---j l� : atoexisin eotk � _ connectionsconnection' toore tion.. _ - ectives , M1nvetavaImOt. exsints,a Ea d i . : .. . ,., '; i ro e ,P , , 1,1 �u i 'Identr issi Ir l0.to cc nnect major i.:;: E' _2_,__L,,,,__.L,_.:,,L,.j ; destinations•ar d:.co plete`.route �� inti dare_ er 4 network . 0 ti . identif "fefe fet ri t r� r :O c i tes * * I i'. :.l ei i f. .s fe "suis 'on`exist ri .arid .. �► �! I --pri tq ed:rorates , 41 • nsure;:accommodation.:of'aivide variation 'in°=user nd t r:p purposes . . ,: irr r:cv r i nts.. rtii,i-,... ' trails and bicycle master plan and ars -...44t -N' . S i Final Report Executive Summary - .::;)titS Background/Existingconditions L Recommendations • . Route Map - ' 4 .,- Signage Plan Safety Flyer . master plan schedule , 11 if-' '`:''.v71: ' ro 'March-April 2007 Task;. > •lnforrnatic�n Reviewr ani ,,,...,,,„;::,, . .r _ -. _ Preliminary'Documentation' ' ',MN., cess `t I Review relevant documents and pians;�taensure consistency with ' ' '" ® City plarfs andpolicies;develop goats and objectives for the ro • " outline the essential components of the Master Plan, an 'Spring 2007 Task Alignment Analysis . ," w Through field work annd research®study destinations and non- ' Public Open House • motorizedcir�culatiopatterns;ass s existgngro,atesar their s z i; May 30th condition arra determine opportunities for creating and erthanc- : ' a, — hg connections and closing gaps h the.trails and bicycle network. I !Fal 200 .-a Task_ Routing; Options& F,. Public Open House , . Evaluation,Criteria . r Building on research and field work,d evelo a network of trails ' � � i��n September �nth � � P _,_ - - and bicycle routes through downtown and the city that will cora . I nect neighborhoods and riajor destinations;develop a system for i evaluating and prioritizing which improvements,and facilities to _..... ...' - fund and build first, Fall 2008 ' ° ° _ .Publiic,Open House Task;.4 Draft Trails&Bicycle Master Plan #3: November'1 _ , i I 3 I _ --- .__ ._....... ..... . e- _, „ Task 5 Final Trails &Bicycle Master Plan . `Deck 2008 . f , „..„,,,,„, .. •-• ratr'sot,,k*P4,4tv4v..;Vi4011,VAN'W'rt?'1..fr''t''''15) - --4.4•44,44.4•••4,..-1,,:.• . 1. -4,4,-;-4$4,. .!.....,,--•:4•.• • • .4---,..;,....;v4.,;.;:0-,441 A., ' In'f.17;P:ii*/#74".-.44** 0-"iii."#."..•,? .."##O#it-.,471,3; '7'•It• r•tiri'er.Orvt*•%..,','.t... 0.,..,.,:,:,,,..'t.• _±,,:.•.., .V,JE; )4.41).<1.41-.A;•4':4fi•'0/e.';%.';,(4:kli ''..,:x,4k,.F.'', .i.,,,A. 5.1e.ed*****IiiitNIt':''''141:1A0***,` t:A'544k;'7"4 iF,'"•,,t,:r4i:4043#,:,,'''',.:••,',',19 . „,, ......,.4,,,,,:joine:,.6'..5.54t :...„ .,.....,c. „.......:.1,:14.,; .tt,ii,,,,,,, ,,,,,;::.<7.f.:tint:..-:"Si...:',74.W.c:.',:lr . ,.:, f.,.T.4:,!.,,,.:1:7•441tN4:1.::.,,,V 7...;e.':'.:1"!.,#,,..-Ii'',,ZA tap rs•'''‘'‘:',:!..1. ,,,,,,';,,,,Ike*,. '':' ' 0.444:tre•*.F14,...?-01,,,,,,,,i , ' ••4. '`'" .. . ,"A A,. •.I; 'OA.I e C; '••i,::'.0!,..'Air :V 4..., . ... •••-. ." " (ID VII Ma IMII• M . all if Mil a- 111•1111• 0 M Vil ' ..7 - :1,14 .,-„4„-27,— , .4r•sa -& -- 1-,,,,-‘701-1. '1-.i:'-•:•-• l' /..°I --14: Kilt ,,r,„iii.-,,Li,,,,,1.1,,,.14.7,.{.,.f.ifil, -„,,.'.1:. . ,... ......, ..,, i .......1, .„,, , . ., 7,.. , a-,,,/, , ,,.7. . ,. ,,,, ,, ,,.7,,,,,,,,,,;, , 2,—.7N,,.,;,;: ,,,,71!, ,:,,::,:•5!,(4,.7,--", - •,,',''"•••-45'P. --:',. •, •' - • i- ;---mAa,---------- ' -:,c,-,-.;..„, .., ,,, :a—7'::,T; ''';':0$,,,..,,,%":Trv,f,;"' i'--,::: .,,,,,vi.6.4„&;-• -.,.:•29,,,..4,,,,:',..,',' , , , . .,,, -...4, . ..:4A41.,_,,,,,..:,, ,,,,;, -,.. .• 3,.,),....-.',,ili•,,,,':,t:-.••...,:-,? ,•,,.'4.'4.:el...,„,!.....,,-,;.,:',,,„.,^,,'• i '.;.,.: •,. ,,• !,I,:,- '-1 ' ."W" ,„,.?`4,41--=',---1.4 '"ii,z,.„,, i,",.. , . :-; ,4•,,,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,hi,. ..:4,.,... ,,,,,, , ,, . : ,. . ., . -,,, . .,;'•' ,,„,,,, ,' '.:',""="7-if:4 ,, ' 'al*:# ,. 'Iiir; k.;" ,.. ;:k;:.#. 7-41‘;',.c'Y':':'':S-‘‘,''' ''''r ' ..,...-„n\A . .:,• . „... :,...., :. ‘, : ....,,....,_,.,:ifs:,,,y. 4:: •' ': •.,,,,,,A,[:4,i-, 1.4; 4.1:1,,Y,44.,;,.M1"..•-'•,.';:,'-'' " '1,•:16 '?'}'(111''''r----', #' "-," '7,c.) ',4,,,;„44',./".,::•••.tt4 M.''''::, ,..t.,k,t'?4, '.:.4.•:,...-7.'; ..:.',„4:t - "'.''• ' ''7'' '* '' ,...,.:' ' ').'''''' '' ' ' iteVirste ''''''''' ..''''' - - , a;al '...`'','"f If tit' `' '. ' •:.- .'•,,,fR . . - , ' , . -••--,... =. .„,. . '1',V.,Atlfi .''' ', ''. ' 7,-„ •4.*7,•, \44,,fx:n-j-, -,.-:- ' , „ . „ ...:4.. -,,,',• . ,••.>,;•.-,'. ,--,-#,-144,'4-,.1-4,,,,,-i;.,4.,..•,.:i‘.-;. .., ,.., . „,,.,„,.„.,k,,.:, •.: ::41..., N.; --l' .01' •'44,4'.-., 2.. .lvt'''7.'•,:.L.,Y.''Il4•i, ,2, „, ,,,,i,„ . ,....,..----..--74-'7'.-41'',.2. :".--,4, ',• .”- 74'4.- 1447-,'21-•• t': '*-s,„:".,,,, ,,....,K.,:,,,. •.•,..0.7 - p. 6 ',,4,r,,,,,, -,1 ,....4,,,,,...,;-; fr'''•,•-"':' ' -: - '') i,;;" :.,:':::•;•:::: :,:ii': ,:".:•.:; ,, --,,,:‘% , , A:Aix 1, .„->f,„0.s. ;- . •....ri,...,;;.; ...,...:,i,;;;;:,.; i;.::;•'.); ];::, 1,,,,, 4 22f,.:- .. ,,,-- -, -4-4--„, A;,i •° %"':li` (4',"'. ; '4,,,, • , • ,• • ,, 4 .,- ... , • t A'... .. . •.' '', ''...'''.• , (1 '''. ' ' ..0 ' ' •41,,,,:,„'„,:;,:„,„ '''....«;-...-- •,',•'''z ''. ^ ''.*7 C . . .-'2'f,'-';',"*"f= "' `, ''-'''..;;:: ' ' ''''/;. :pr4.;:t.'4 1.7'''',41 :.'''' '%. , :'-ii"0'.% l'r7,,,-,''..' •,',„„2„,', •• •:-. fli: -.4' ' .::',..,.::::: :::::.: ::::::i'l',H:i:'i 1,,,,,•:',:.,7.1; :y t.';.;;" :' r:\it'N.: klY..44!4 ''"4 ",.';;',','-v.-, 1-',"?''', ' ..fi';'-'1 ..:'::-''::': '''.': '::.' '.:ii:iii:::•:li"•'..: •"....',.:' iii- • ::i'''''• •• ..,ir' firen,=•.a EP-i ,,,'. i:'ilitt! 4,...,4-- .:?.• ‘-''''-: :, 11 '''.. -';'.i'....:id'.• '''''.411,,:::,,..- -1-''' r ' '# . . ' - iff . • . l•1=1-7,;2.: 1141.. ,,,..• .41 • 0 `•4''';',..1,1,..',1-X.'';; 4A... . -' • . . -,,..;..,,A,. ; .::;i::,•;;..:;:,..; to-,.;•0 ;.•;;; .);;;: i :•;;;;-:;', -1'''';'''1 ' • '4 _=g—''' ,,,;. ;;.....:, ••=...,....tf........-.. .,,Q....,..,...;A:.';',..e:-", '.1',;:.:',::.:, ':'.^.^,'''‘,.,•,' i.,.':,.:' t:1':'4',...:4-r,..,,,,-',.i ...7.. ....Lee ., . ....''.16',-.. ..' • El , ,, v,,,:. ,-..- - - z. ••,,, .3 4147- ---.-----.44, .',?..its.-. ..,::::',.''....•:::,i;, ;:i,:i::-..:::::.:.:,'."':r.j'4016;.]',';';'‘..,fg:•:;'''„,-,1(;-.---;•'1•:. -•Pi‘.;; .:..'-‘,.li ;::;, 1' „,; ,iti, ,„ ..„....,:i_.,;,.jr..„7,,,t ) , ...,,,,--t--.:,;=:,.,-,,,,,,..,;, ,,,,-,iit,,,;-,,i::ii::::.::.:.,, :::-::,i4-c.:::,,A-1: .,,,..,,....;.:,,t;!:!.,,,;,:,;:t.,,,,,-.;',,-e,,i:'-,::.'.,,,,.,-,.•?'"": ''; ',...,7.1":-' 421.1.,,,,24.<7,7':,-,',),WIT.:!'tr'SVI::4 :'fi:25g''''' '.';;;:: 1 Cil ''''''''': :. .'-'.:.S.:7'-'1 T'-'14'44'. .::.: ;7:-...-•!;01{;C'f'''''.:tq'''''.''..;:"'"; ",' '''''' - '' ' '.'''J, . -'sr;;'...'f.F122.'4''',-:".,e,.:: P ! ....:,:r. ! :„:1,?,. • ,:„..., ii: !, 1,.:.:::::...,,,...., :vz.:,...::!i!:.:.!::::!,.::.,,,!!........, ,,:,...1.,,:;!::.: 4...„,..,.4„,„_ ..,„,,,„,„ ..,,t,.?,,, ,„,, t,, ,,....:,•_01.4,:. i .:•x . .4' .: :, !'•-,•-,',-,.,,. 10.".,4' ... ,:.?.::::::,,,,•=7 .,..,:,.::,:::-,-.. ::-!.0,,,,..;.1.,„..,,, .-.N.- -(73,-;.,,., , ,,,,• .:,-.-2:',-:.'41 144-V3,...-f,...,1.-.44„: 410. i-,,'',',1`. • •' -;1 . . -.41,,';:;,_ :::,- ;,':',,:.,,/,_24,,I;',,,,,„;',,'„,:j.,.'-:.,:.:;::',,!.:'!',/' li;.; :-''' , -::,',..,,.': .,,,,,i.;:,,,,', .,',..,, ;',.lit9".r....r..:,1::•74,),,,tiliFicle 1:,:...!E?.'. :Ai .. ' . '. :.'' . 1'VI Y-'!•.;:.;;;;4-.;:::,•;,0.:.'::••:••`.-4-4,',.-;•.:.-;.:=„t....','-f,-,,rik' . 1,-;,;,• 5;tkeir.'.----,; ,,...::-.',::,:;-:.,,••;r-, !n;--- i•-,. • 0-'• •: ...,).''.:•;:•,, :::':.::::!:f'2..'.4%,','", ,,••i''•!L'I.J,..•...T••,„'.1`,"-'4:"4" Lc1=4,14';•• ,"".'Xi44-r..-T'7,r,'''..:,' ,;,g',„ ' ;r: •..::'. ,f:'• ..,'"'' ''.'':: •,.I'l '::,:::44.',1::„, :::.;,•••,;;',i:.::!'.':,..,-,?.1`.'',f...;.:M..:.,4.7,..., ::,.''':?;*.r1 ,,'-••:?,-..i,.; ,•••" .':•01f.,,,g,y,,,Eii:i +.9, ';'- ‘.•' • ..-' ' , .i- '. '4''...,,.'S:.:.]:.:::.::'..:"':i:'''''...''''F..'illi'...:::.:'1,".: •:'':! iiii:.4',7-,i-• .....:,.:.',"•'4/44.- ;'.• '••1:.,:-41;•:;;-..'1'],,,,4„t.,s 2. '. • '', .: 11,•'-;. :,„ :,..., ,' ..2.''',,) -FT: •• ':::. •••:•• . '...:4,•••,..-•.•^..:.•:R014$ , .2,-. 4,„,v,‘,4,41..,,I,;;;:"4,.."-,,,i•!:, . . . „ :,t•-:,.".„-.,'' '' - ' , ‘s- ; ,•sn•-•-- :',..y.'''','„Tii4:•--4:441'h '''..4`• ...• ,..•,-,,,.'-',i'," ..... ' -, -4." , .-:,r.. ..,..,!.'''..:'':'•• ••' •.•:,:,:-, ''.',,.,,„?,.."..:-'',"„:';.,.,•0..r::,,,.,i:-:,1,..,,:,•:.,..:,,.,:,_..,,.-..,':j,„-.,U„..:::':::.:,.L;:',':.'fi,','.,,'•.,'..:;,!'„,:',.'1.',7',.',,,'',•X!::''?,;..;„:'°,,'',-,4',i.,.,.,i.1y4,-1,,•4,-,4::,-,,.---‘,',-,t,4:-,.,.,..,..'!ii,:..t,'•.,:,”',,'%',').,'.,:.•,r111..-:7,-,'.'•'''-',..''.,':...:':'1i'',,,;'e•-,Li•'-'•,4:--'-'::.-,:'2.4:...Z::.A:.1t.'iy---'.:4:..-5:,'.,!1'2::,!:'':•:s,:.•.•''.r_e,-,..,..4•.••,,.•;•',..,'--',/;?,,.•,;„':•;•,,:,-;,;-,•r:-'--12,.t....tiFr-•1r--,-4i!t••1'':':''?'r.4'-:'.4O4;'i:4-r(•v'',.,'‘”.11,'? ,a•- ,- -4.,-,- ';.-.2....:...::..--,:...',••• , IL dc, k . & ,I. .• .: •••••,.• --474..;••• '• ,-..-, •A.-<ui.. .i •';' ;..,".iy,-,...•„ ':-; ' •'' •' ' ••• -",' • -':•`S'' -. ;. a-o• ••.2.•—,s,:f r":-?..,7,•, •. '''(,-,' 4 I 44'-.7r"';.`A,,:, ..g.• • . .,r;.:‘, • ;.:'-•lii;':: ;•;:;; ,,,a:•••";:-::, : ,, .;-;•';-'•i!' ..;•P•;'. -.:;v,.,z;;••••.,• .;!: •• ; . 4, • 'i,P; •',.F z:. ••-i. ii: •",,,, z - • #r'!':..,'.. ;".',••.'-,V4i'Z'C'l t•;•--, ..;e':- ,' ',...., , •,s:k•-•414,44/-..,„.: , '. .,.'";k‘.:,•."; • •,,- •: ' FV,'f- ' ''',9-; . . -- - -•'''' ,::.,, ,,I,,,,„4-4,,,,,.-.-,n----1,,,,,, ,, ..s. ,I. ,.,,,... ..,.„.... ,,,,,.,,,,,- 1.., -.1„x 1 ,,,,,, 4,1,:=„:, •c"'-' ,‘ •.;`;V::‘,.'',.-- ..:. .:-. 14•„J Eit •'.2. .'• "- • .-v.4'..•2 ..•2 .. •••4... iz7,11 -,/ ,•‘,,..„...,0,444,,, . '41zzkE. .' r, 5 ¢ g -i44 w S .I a,,., • IV A wy `rX+?' moo:+a tie-. n+ "$o• '.r'�`A� ° C O (ID via ri (D O vi vii O ‘40< € & ;-•• • �r g • :/ ea 9 • 'CD C e, f aY '',,',i4';'., w 1 tg {1 � V7! ,� s Y • P" a § t3 s'. "`dq .••=.,,,,---.., i,: { '" a;+:•r a:. q„ w• - Y s "fes;n '4 �. a� 1p 'I'- is f' �,ty ':i i.::�.ai»,t' N'e�k"r s�:,. � y,� Y", Via,1 �'3 f .N b ,,,,:a., t.scacF":, :.;"• . ep '.a"%;'..`' .`r.+.,,,�y.a``,�,> „' ':{� ta,:;,'��p., ,".. �"" ` �•. }t" i.'" `,t.:-^a'•.. "{ ',,i S';'=1=,)',3' y','"';I' a'-' '' .,.. "'t"'z." d` • ...5' m --# • „1:/•••'' "t "'''''a"--''' : 18 8 :: ,‘,1;;:.i44'441,,11 , 44' "1 a::-•,lig .y`. :.: 7-'7'''V, .-p 'it,-.;,41-:,...;';''.1'.4:•; 1/.1' �¢3,y�».dt r:4,��4s t fR`. `.F aP ,f}",.,.' ''Yb,E, �"q, 'E!, '{'3Y;xya® 83.• �yy k', �t; °' >.1,. x• '•' +i ikq '} wY•P'a N. ?;d4:.' >i 3.:A"£e: xa rz:'Q,. S.,. ' T' �� }" „• r>,, ( .»E�-., y, V -s. {t ' r.,-', •`�k' ' aye `,y M- v; r - r+..r ":P�`� ;14'. e, vd..,... "_. 1,,i..,..r F mw '74..1'"7,i,"%i;'nsx;`r,'."}6N...'wa'¢, ea--,;..y.. , ,',,,.'10,T,,,,;,-.,,:,,, f +•-_< ;:, ,.:::. ..r.-..4,4'-'4,44::. •'.y 5�,.,,,ic .�"i'm�k'r'�.I^ .,w,4>1 w�aRF';� : y .i oi• '";a�.k ��z`*rte'..°s, ':i' is :.�",. •' ' _1.,...'',..-4,,,;:'; �{��$', a .4'..4:.;:711410.4014•<;;:.,.,. * 'Pan's".. .r.: '".6< �' , 4:Eaw.,,;,e> .,--or; ,..ie . 0, t.fir.>, ,, s , a'ti,i,,,� ".:c}' i.'.: �•� 4.`1:' .,�Yb�`'�";.d:._y,e'.7 •; b a'�.,,°,, i�.a a'.' � ,^i:,.>sa'. ' „`-:�.,,'"''!','';' ,':1:°. .r:°•''',./!!'. ='x+is •„:•;,:',47:-.14' Via.:,+ a € J�,'.";r<p,.,;t "g" .,'- 'a:‘..,,;;::-,:•;'. .T• „c.,. 1;4 f:, 8M, at.• .d;'a'-!',,Il`y,• "" ,;,e, •'; k ,.;'d.,.sr;.I ¢'"•r'`" ai g e,,;,4; "'L,,,, sE..i..,°%. .5. '-:i.' ' ;.l I:, 3 FA 'yt,�"' ^.'`9 9p ." 'y, �.� ,s„ .^.,1••='r b}..i.,�j r'd _ • J ,<,§ ?.11wy a..E3,'+� i;i�• .k: 'N.'i..' • ',0,-,?', ,, 'y4 •,,,;,,,b,d', 'E•-S! ,6`s tr '144 '� ;4, {`P f� .--, '-:'--..-.1 ''''`f,-...;-. .4(. r.p-��;,F.. 2�N.`:«„^a 1 G . YL° J,bt....i�«'Rf F: qY; L: • '�:s-a x:ibw.c.SFg•• {yy$. ,Ia?,' Y,:,, _ ac„ 'R.:. ,{ .xla,gg ,.f�,aa r ;' ':a.. .,, ,.,, {x. 'j �� igsM .Y '�,"w^1 k 8i+ ..�7„ roQ• :j» .r. �( 'r ��"{�� 1Y. ';.•t•,•'4,,,,.;,,,, ,,""!, .Y. '4.s V.. ��9 "fit.i .F .••2--:-.e'.� .N:�`; . } ♦ s +'#� Fos pa '! _ a".. .,.;�:� �ti' i-#�i.• _,�''• ,q> 'S:."f y," ` [7Fq'ya�'p,.�i,:. i;.: .a�g� • .,,� �.`};�� A'• 'Z,�' :'h wiggA R,"• Ai, H> A.`. ty p,1a�..do g.< '.2 a8 "�y �y .., `p...iY.F:'1 ^r F.': - s.•0.`'f'�: -;`f..,» �gYY�P �R��sx:',�'.f S,'..=•:i p+,;. �4 'i .}.a' '3e�F�`G«;y.iwr,.eaa�y w-raw+"~" •�x. ,'' a.< _ },, z !'';}. •' ,qN:e d..;�:za"-_Y ..i stpi. "4 :s . •fx"a gy ':A" , T • 'g ,1.`s,4::•'=' 'j - t.L' y3;>, •a-;.';,.=:.: ,t"•:ggi ',:•.,',... a:.d •-: i :R't `x ...,,,,. M-:::-•,,,..d,..4.,...,:--` r d+;;:�.^, - ..ik:'i{��:g'.♦ :i., `,a"N`d' y ,V ':4� F". ,x 3'.�j n k. ',♦ %,c-%A ..,,s».w`Si 4`t :14. :41444=4'x,.w.i'w `.'aa'.'bi'w3:`»- zr <€' .•L':t,'€ Vit:,, ,• ,'''e ,; 'st . '1.''••.-!•,•;" i...I.a •; J* :a. `4.,pd'w«Rassbi:': ."..::ic >a�+,' :+'Z•`'' j. ,a',".'* .':3 4:'.'a -•�g �� ''�� aim.:�'x.�. • ":�'.j4 . re�R_.',;y;.� c:... Y'� e9. '"Fi x...).'' -' � r ,--,?..--,,,,,T" ���;; gam' -,_;,..;:it,;,,`x "r qc,. • „`.i•'' • "" '.....• aA -J,. ' ... _ E 4 -.{` <-�: ''" r- .:sa,.,':',•,:,...-•-•;k1" ;:'D r.-§i=,<., u' ;' 4 • xp:-„ '-t :a� ,•�.,: `:�.�',;..n•:;.'.(Lrv, `,.wat;' di,” , : xi6•,.: ' .1;=:',Aama :r• f' + '? ,® W� . �"w'r_ c, , " .,,,L4.ivki a' 2 co # .x` d> Summary of Public Comments House 1 Open # r • Improve connections between the regional trails s • Establish safe and convenient east-west route through downtown � ' • Create safe routes to neighborhoods, esp .-44 a � `� ,, Highlands • Improve wayfinding signage, esp. through w.*,,,,,,..:::: downtown oa • Foster more awareness of bicycles on roadwa s y • Improve and maintain facilities with bikes in mind • Modify critical intersections to increase safety 9 and convenience for bikes „ ,,,10:04.,,,,, Summary of Public Comments ..., , , .,,.. , ,.01 ,.,,..:,.. ` , ..„_, ,.. Open House #2 ..„ .. ,,,,,:4 ..” . - ., ,,,,,..„.,,,,, , ■ Ensure stron and clear connections between regional trails ,,, ,,-,,,,,, , ■ Go forward with recommended routes„,,,„.„.,. , � ■ Resolve identifiedproblems s ots -;, p H ■ Ensure shorter connections es . to schools, etc. ■ More detailed route recommendations identified k is . i .tet v.< x+s ■ More input from South Renton and Earlington { ••`- = neighebors ,,r-,1-,7,. a. .� .. ''� `.Vf 4`.. - .r`S'� :: h,af�, 3 ,v-. j-L r ,4,-,...',-,::, ?'„i. -,: ;: ” $ d.� • • l ,.:ea� Y ,� �'% k a.. ^�',os„ ` £'','ti p, i ;,,, W i€ -.:st C.-" 'A `1 � v • fie£ ciy f yp ", ' yL r jy �3gg _.. y_;,L. 'S * <"'"Y� „ • • '7' 'ab.. w_' yx. `' •° i. 'K'^:D 5 .41 GG«gyp 'Sa .41744.. „. r > . kr..,,'”,Ya 4 ",.4€ ' :aM e" ey W. . .1`�+.:•ET.Fri'^.a. .,%-: ..,,F '." Lir., '"- "' "•" ' b ._ _ .?;i4.,-,:: . . ......»........_.... .........» -......t rte ! .. lwy :3:x^' .«..a 6. xri"ax < " Proposed Improvements • Cross-sections designated for each route : §A,A multi - use path , bike lane, shared roadway, soft-surface or hiking/walking trails • Trouble spots possible amenity locations identified • Highlights: a �R. • Connections between Regional Trails ?.sa • East-west and north -south routes through g downtown • Improved connections to neighborhoods 11 •.- - ..,; r..;:.. •.: :.:'.`?.. * ;-;:7':'::`"''..,.'.-?.'-':l'-',:::".,?;;:, '':',''''''''. :'...'. .., ,::"2':1 ,y.L..„,„..,,,jt,,,,,, ,.., ,, , ''',:''-',.:`?''S.:-:''''''' ''''''' '' 1 ii. .7.L'-' .1i i• ,.::":: A• .-' ' ' \ , -. ).':', .1 {. imijtefi, :-4•"',. .„ . "tviEriceR. '--,;:,,,„.., ,.., . ,•',1 !,--,"-,_,..- - 1„ ti.,-, .,, ,....•,,, , ,, ,• :•:,7•IiAt,,,,, , . -• ,..-:;,•,..•At •.: -,i •15Lop• 4.•;,;„.-:- •• •- • ,,,,,,,.;,-•,••.!;•,: ., '.' 1-1',:',.. •i•, :.• . .•..,"•..•-, *i4v4kgii!,•'•:'; .••••5 , - '-• ...,i ''',•••'-, '.', ' ''',KiPl.'tin.a.s'T-- LE''' ---; .-, ';--,,," '''' f: EoiAti44 .„„... .•.. ,..•••,,,,, .„., .„ ;.„.:•.. .,_•.,,.. --.• •- -- -_,,,,„ ,,, . „ .,,, „! :•,,,,....,,„,,,,, ,,,. • ,,,...„,„.,:„.„ ‘.. : ,,,,,,,,,-.:•• ,/,.„ ,,,,,,••-• ",..‹,\--„...„ 74,,,:fy,,,t4toirl •,,,,-, •,. --): : ,1,Z•e-7..-:i4.,..:W.'''.1,.."', <,=.: '•'„,',.11::-:- — —, "::::,-, - ,,,, -',• -.„ ii,IA..,,,,94,i-,:.:>•, , ,.r;.1 'sl.-•.„,„..•,t:7',n",...,;,,7„* "..:.- 'f;..,:.'" .'-‘',':. , '. I 9', - ' '': 1. , ' --:, ,,, „..-- ••% ,,,,...,,,---M .Y,--.!,-,64;,- t-41;;,,,•;;4,„,, X „ ' . •-:-1",.'•';4:4..,:ii-,,7-S.-g",,,;,',,,,'„,:',:t•r:!'4,47: : -.".'''.",?,*, ,, ' '..r"::, . ': .,,„S',.,...',,,,,,,a,H ' , • .;.,;..., 4 ',...,..N.•—:.t. )c,,,A,I•„,,,4 ,, •,;47,1 ‘,...‘„ ',,. 'i, '•,.• 1 ,, '.;••!!‘','''"' ••4,` • 1 • • - t•..!.:,-,.!''',.• 1 '''• ' • ''AL: ,-\, ".-1 f:••',,,':-,I' -,, ',..1,•:-i !..;,,: :••,-\,; :.'4--— .: .--,,; • ••,,, .;.1t-„,-4:.-••,4, •-7 ..:, ••• ,,y• -.4',....-.1,,,A.;,. .L7,-,,,,i % -,:•,;',,, .-,:, ,,s.:-,,,,, , ,,‘, . „..,,, • ii„.„<„,4,,,,,,,..44 $ --'''-',,,'w'-'d -.,..N.:t,,,,..,:::,"•-:-!;-- , ,,,, .--,•,.--.,-,•, '• . _ . . ......... „ .. . ..„ . •'';9ii. ,,,,,,,...122.• •.:.. „:„..i.,„ .t, ..1,,,,s„t.,-,,,,•-.4,..4,-. -. •N. '•,!,••:,J,:,,,I,, ' -.4 -„,:'N,''',1-'2;,•"';.;'," , !"--/.,-,•:,,,,.!.‘!" ,„,.!,!,' 1,;!,"!'''',•=6-''''' ' :, , !• 4,,,,,:,;,,,,-„:_,,,,,,„! ,,,,,;„...• :Ai,"•• y!!,,,,,N. ,....,-•. • ..,.. -; , '..,.:c--,,,,,,i,,7 .,4" . ,:i'':-''; ' ,' 4,.,....1. , ':: ‘..,.;,,•,- ;4. ' ,r,4,r.4,,, :!,,;-„A ,-;',`,.:'-,,,3•7T:',,,..,,,,•,A`,,,',..L-;-:";;.-7,'7,.:: ::•-::4;.''- ':-,'1,,„•,':, ‘,:.„, ,:: ',.-.\`',il,s': 1,',„4,74,,,,;,...,,71, • , , A.-- , :.;,,, !, '„ -,,,k,.........„,,,,,,'„ -1,i. -::''.,1,,t,',44.1 ,..--,s-,:-',,,,*.; ,-,.-:;. ,,,,,,:','''j,,,..-:,;,,,,,j,,,..,';•jr It,,,.,.. ,. - k, ,..::11:,,,,,,,,.4,e_ ,,,.,.k4,.;;-;. / i'''.•-)-'1:',1:.t'''''f':1 •r. ;:., • , ,..•; ,„„ -., , '4,70' ,„..;,. ; . . !!A*41.4,-,',..'''':','.„!-•-,,•^•;,;::-4.,,,1', ,7.0,, ',',;-.7.".`,";,''''' '"'' ' ' . 4"''''-'7' . '. ' I 1 , .'. k...# ,•.t.,'„'.,,,,k,,'„, . aw. •''` :'''' „•.'•., ', '. ,',',.. - l't y: -,..,r, ' ..:'0.‘jt4e.,444.1.. ' 1 ,..`.... t„.f.".:'.7. 1...' ,•,, .,-4 . , ,.. ,, : , ', . „ ' '''.., .-'-''...:g.g",'::-:-;."'".!°\.-':'".71;,`,,',-1 '`Eit'-{-•--.,,, :1:::::•4'.v.-i.:: ,,,t'.: . --- -I posed . , •:,,.:..•,,:.,„:,::,,,,,,,;*,,,,, ,,;',,,-..,- ,,c,,,.: , r- i,.......-,„.•.. • ,i, ti,t.-•;,.,--L•::•:'-'',-..,J,'' '- --.- „ :$47? '' i •:.': rovemen s ..---, ,a----7,,,.. .„-„". ,, ,,, . ,,, , ,[......... ,, , . ." .. „., , „ ...„..,..,,„ ,..... , k. ,.,,, , „,„, ,, _,,,,, ,i_..„ ,,. -...:. '•'''' .„_.,-...:::::-L„-it 'II t.-"'4.?",N, ' , ;, • .,..•:, ' tt'!' •!': *:.,---""'"Zit!'ttN.'"'•!;!!‘'N.: %"•'''''' ,. „,,,,----7,—,,,,,;,,-.7;74---it, i**.0,•4p,:: ,,,:i-,- •it.,4gg';.4t.0`--:„.3 ..;,:',.. ,f- ,-:-;.—:: ',., .. -,;-.:1,,1 1 .it- tie i ,;.,-N;:,.„-,„,,,„,,i -..' A,,,,,-..2. . ----0 ;.-.,-,,,.,...-•,,,,,,,,,',„,:,,, T , •.‘,7”k,,s,p,:ts.v-,...• •,-;7',-, ....i.:;r7..' -,,,›..' ” : „,„.- ' -N.A.k.4„/ i '''.-11:-:-,1.,4-."Th-,,,,„•,,,..i„ . . '-i'. ,---;--,? .. ..- • L.t .. k,, ...;: =-, r f"°".....N• -,,---fr-... '' .,---,----,..}.1:;,.:i'''....,,,n........ ' .4 ' ..,.. 0.:•,..`' ''', • ',..' . ' ' '..1. 4:',.'. .•...,,.. ...,:t:iii,F04,10''' --; .;'---.;,• 1 ,' '. i 'lik .,,' ',I;.,.."1 .', ' ^r"7" 1'.- .,'I. ,, ,'•,..'" '''',,,:.., 7',":"': !"-.:,1. e's,t . • ' ' 1-1 "iy , ',.. — —'-'-';'..ei''' '''' i.:''''' ' • ' . . " : 1 i.,,,ii . ' --,--- ' '.4'"' ::•'i ' '''''''' -- ' ' ,,,. Tuica Gs, ; „.„-' . ,;,.•,a,* ,.... .,.......;„1.1.........r... !, , _..,..51,:eirstr7,,;:.E,:;.,„:4,,,,:s.., • i-,•,. ,- ;.. ,...r, 17,1 ., . * ''''',Z.'4...:" '':„.... , i ,,,..ii ',.., . ;,.: 4,`,;.,i4 i.'"'" `,".r% • ':',1 .... ';;t:':,,...;r,. ‘, -- t'' `f.'3'.'0 '-'."-'::,4,.'''''.: 'f" t'.•:'i' :''' ' ':.'' '''''T -;:,.......i....;6 ,,..•,,ii. :‘,::;.1.'..1....1.....,:.4,...,2 #-. • - -. — • -•_ . . .•....•-. .. R,;,' „-, .i.,,, ..,<-.1 l''''"'''') .A,("4..m.......iww.... . ' .r. ' . Nfr 4, 4 ;- ' ' ,? '''''';..-- sif t ' ,',1 r• •, t , .,. .„ f ; 1•'1''', •:, •, .4:j --2;•.;,,; • ' F,,,;,..,2 - • 4 , ,,• ••' •••• ,t--.tao.14Stett • , , - t.....,-- Lttot5•44t4 ,---7.:..,,.:,..: :::,,:-.L .:-. .„31 .a......-....7,...",....4.,. • utsrt-14-nourFs, .,,,y,'-• , 4 • • '.i '''-)- '.c.,: -, ''•'" t ., 1 ,, ,„r,o •: ..„,1,••,, .1',',.1 L,-‘,,,, • i ...„„.Pott404traikt4414ttil 1 •!,!,t,.t-,,,,,,!..NA t••!!!!-'-'''''' , ! —,„, ttuttt!witIktcti , ;•i'••••• •1 ,!•' ' - ' : ' ''''.7'::: •••,,. , ••• 11-,:•..,!!'„4";:•!.4,4.'",' ,!!!!!!;•••!;-., „r„!, . 1 ...—i...4Erta IMP *" - .1.;....„—,;=. 4::•.--:•--.=i4f:j.- -.:-; : .. ' .. , --..:1"tV4':4' •, .. ,,, • •. „=.. ••.. !--,, =i ..,.=:-g i ...,,, ::: . '.... , , 1 .......isiov.w.tralAlltre Alt,fini'lei.4,0 i ::.' .7 4 :‘,','..".,. , ..w......:milr. :isoutp.,,,,.,="'::„I-, -:.:„:,,,,`,'•:',,2'.'717;;,,,L,,,,,,,:.,,..;'..' r- ‘. - -T. ,,„.,, : ,.......Nastt,lt It.It Wil ) .1., ' '1.-• -''':, - " ' ,'''''r:4,,' "'"'-',:.' l'' * i e " •• i t.' :InvesizalFv.g.''',1V Sial.Aing '' ', • l' •'•' - ':.J .. - --..:::' ,,, f', .... t . .,. 1•';;•••''' ' 1 — '''• -;----r.;:'-, •,' •-' 21 I ..!.;.• • ' • % • • ; . ''.--9 ---:--- - -.• ... ,..•• • ' • • -,,,•-,• '0, ',.•.;;;...•,; it:-;. %>,.:,• ,...,... '• i :,„'..,:. ,climari CraNwitiettyl,DOran ; L. ,14.31W...4.3.&.M • !::', i^''."': 2 ' .. t.- „ r•I VAIP:ISSW-, ' I • , i- i., .,,...._ ' ,- iriarpinIthrall PrinlIrlir nii ill 2 istath St II • ii 'ti..• ,,.. ., j_. j •: .. „,,„ - i, ' ' ; jl, :' ° i&J3 •• 1j, :-. , , i .tr, .!:!„....!:.....!,...., 0.t ik . . •,,,,t,L., . ›,...„4---...........-,•..------,.„,.. gI.X0 1#'' .;T: la,. F.;- ar"•.., Mit4TE „ 1 ...., 1:::( I4II ti!lae•-: t . , 14 ' ,lf,:!.,0 e`•:•=4: Ilf, , \ i •E', ' ; '' ..; •„.::', 'Mr-Arra, .i4.i.1111,1it.i.iitr„.. ,,, ati„..w4e,,j„,,-----J-- -:.`” ' xJ,?;:.-,J I iri (''' I: ' i ''. :, ' 'i "'''''' '''::, : r"s'42.4"- - '''''' '1 '4 ' '" Jittit_,5 moutailumuma ...-••••••-_-.;„,k,:t li;I ••••:::k;••40;;•,:: .,•-•". ,IL,,J2jY_____,J •:•• '``i ' '..J '. • •:::',••• - 'J-'1A, :;,•j-•: .i"„:L•-,•1-•:' ."4 ',' ele, .41P : 1.r.z J,:,,:,-. j. _ ,,,:?..• ..•::;%.15.,m,j-,-• .;,.4.„,„1,,,Jj.,,,, .:,jkarkg a - , q #4'... el itf...•'''...••-*.ti'im •, ' :-• i ... -.,..,,,,:::,..., ,,,,s,,,,,...,,-,,':,• ••,..„.,:,, ,,-1. ..„......, , ,kz-/..,g/ pi :, 7,— ri.A;',' ,- ' • , i '-4!':•''',''''"•;•: -,ii'Ve4u, ....',:-.t.Ehifilt4ii,-,,,i4,44. H4111/1,0 41141:"yer" ,4f''. li: 4. ;a1-.•',. I• ' • . ••-•- : ,.. q; s,,,,,,-,-,:'••1-,f.i',,•;‘,••:.„.,:';';','''''.••at 4WAY'•••', '', Ii '' '''-'71,4''I't.", ' i .''• ''. '',;`,',,,',,' • .1,.:"4'i,,',.,r,-11.•',;I•:,,,,"...'"I","Ai rIttii ,.< „,........ ,i, .1.:.. .., 1 „.,..,:,,,... . _ ..... . : .„,, 17 „4„14„.„. • ,..:i. , ...,., , , \,21.,„,,,,.i,,,,..i,..,„ :.:::,.„ 1„,. ::,..,‘ g :!:i!:,%t:,lT''4•, ,.‘!.,,::.,:„,.:.:,',,:.',-.",..,:'.„‘•-"•,'1?-.•,,,.:•$•.•1;.:'•=*1'2,,,.f,4%.; t4• 0 -„:„...„,•„-,..,..•...-,--.••-:,,',1,.‘.„,.--„-'•,,.,..,..,.-J.0:.!...:*,„,-,-;-.,,,,,,,.-••.,.;,•,'','.'.,„••.1 iVq1'1.e,,,•l•'•,••,•••.,=.f,.7•:.m4:•:4•,'i'N-11,,,....1_', e-1-*•,,,i•t--r.l.„',ai1....1..'..ff-.bQ...7 i,Thq,-,-...,E,"o--IR„-w'4f, Ai.-f±25ti-1tif.P4a;t-..-*4x,-,-i.rmi,,•'i.-t.1,^u,•.1..t..t.",.':a•'i.i„';-..l.•i•k•,.k'.k-.,i1'ji..!'.J'.,;..A:.-..!‘:..'•`.4•.i.t...rkJ % wntown li^,-i:.,..,,,4ji,;f.•-,=,,.;'-.'--,-'''..•.s".1.,.„e,/4'4,,,.,,,-;f,.=1:•"‘.•,'p,',=':.'.:,i'4!..4-Ji..:t..'•.i,0,A-•,.L.s:'';,tS•v-i,•,'.,i,44".,1•1-0,k;1;\'--.',:;',.1':-!:.'•.-4,._:c.,:':.:,',J•JTl,,.,::,,,'a';•''.,.`-,•;-.•.-.=,°,','•--.-,:.,7•:';.1.1‘"d”=11i1'0i4'-•'-11:,4;.-7,..,•4.,':1•.,•-o•:•,•:,,;-i;;•'•;,.‘&,•..•,,'7I t';1,7t;A,:,--,„,,",r,.„..'.4.••8.P-1i.--„..--74f5•,t4-fem$;431-I_1,y,1--5,;l',iIe:,.fi/.:..,.4..7f4'"4m:,i,,”-,r,,..,,-s.,'''(e1:„/''.''/„-"-;- ,.,,.••.*”1 i I ,,;—,.•,',..•,. ........4... •.: '. ,5. ':' i. , ..,ta : - • ,... ,i, . ,......,.--: , ,==-1=. -i,Iwo,- ,oris,,,,,/ • •cedar—=:,:\ ''' amlon ..,tao,I;la•,, -A,--E1 ‘.„, , , . ,..„. zto :II..':••i44',.':&;t:7'.1i :•;',..,„,_,_.,;;,''l', •11, '',7 a-'42 i.144”‘ „,,.flEA,,,:,•-''t•• 1', :,.... ,-I•,:••:, •','• .,,.., :: N,:i? , -, :lie/,./. ' "•.,, . • 4•'...I7' ."7*,%ty7-'•i i t I : ' ,.:-'r, ,..•,• ' \ •- ,',4 :".,::"•-1, :,:" 0: • i . - • - •-,t- s?OA. ..,: !„.L. ' 'i- :. - ; ,_ ;3ii, ,' . .,1• Rre&Park • 4 • . ,yorit+,--1-.-.4,--4 .4j,,,„, .. .j.,-,r.i...--ts ,. •-1,7,2 ,„•;;•r••- r, t",.-eft-4.3,,,,:, -"°: ki*141:4 ::;:;•. :?..?,i - "AY I•• I • ' ..'' ' ' • ':''1710 ., ....,1;,,,a."•,,,§nk,•, Al i ''' .Q4k" '1 to:c'W,^iay Cr; r-'q. •44w4,-,,';'',,er: '.:•. , '„ , . I : !Ill".Aut . 'ii iC4IE.,F et, . :•, , ...,,,:„., , : --, .. , , ,-,.v• - .• ,T-=4=e1 :I:':1 t3, .:',',.. - . ,.,-."'/;"-- - • I`..r4,'^•''' .1.'•R‘,I.,..4'. ''''', ',,f,, ''•8.-.3rdSt -;' -J'-...J'..„,'::-•v-4!,,,,.„1 - IS, , •jj...., 1:'• j'•.-•••-:".... .:;.•,--"-/•-•,n , "j\-.:• • •Jzi..,..fogz•v:-• , ---"'--- ' •„1-....sma--vitarl EPArT.WES—Ptitarrr R44"- . '. *. ....v. gi a /4,, 1 , : **14.3MXIS 4' "41kitAilftw.a., - , •, . . . W. ... .I.411:37741 e .!!!. - — ! •:•.-.04.-rdP1- ,, •.:.-.' . t., : '.*: . :, az ,-. •:- vg 4.....• ,••:- :‘.• '' ' ; .. j'',,..„,'. kt , ..:.: m.,D,•... 0,.s.s mi. .t. i ... . , . . , . ,. ,, ,. 1•k' t It.:: S..4,',.'TCI • ,•.0 ',C„1; If, • Ji. •••' •• 11/1•J'I •Ji,•=.-.J.-:•v'z;•:'- . , . 't. ,?...',', . 11,1 -•=,. •;•;.S,101 ,..0 '....':.. ^ fa•-•••••:. -i ,j,',J ".”•••,.. 4 j,-1.•.'1,-;...,•:,g+t1 '.'," J "•;,,V1',41,17:*.A.-•.• kok.*7,,.!••- -L.<'Jg,.• , ;>' •''' 1,112,-''J.;••,'„':: .'.''rt '. ..„- -• .4°•'''J • •' ' j,j'4i••-.:•'•"g'f, ,*; ,-]•• ,•:•,:•;';':-4.... §,7;,-„i[iiik•F„• it17. , ,_:..„,,f,:7-'.:...' 11.'4.7'''••-' •'•-",-,t?` . '\' ---r = '‘' '' .;-::=.„:„:•,-,,,, •.•-'Ai if Itt,=,14 ,_-,,,a',..' -a '..,. ,•''',•,.-: ..,•,• •.',4`'''' ''1. ''..:...',,. ,..:„ : ' ' .'•..;',;:x,;,•.'I'-,'"•--;--4,1 , ,,,,,,,,,,:: : - <3 J.,- 4: J-J.--•••, ,-.- • ,::,-;,- 0`6:•• ',V,,,,,;•1; jj ,,,:i!,„: ,:..J , '1, 't• • „„ ,-,,z,VP° ::P.J-J,-,4-„J•:.;,,,Zi.if,441 9. .,,,,,. •i ''''' "s '' '".0'''.'''';‘'ll''''''i,': imi l" :•-=1;;; • =‘ ://1. !.'' ':',":,• ::1° -7 ,..,. ,„ ,....N„ . k:.4 ', ,,,,,,,-''.7.' e;)''' :.:,' ;.',':,$••bItVal,...L.P.,:."..2-' .0•§-.: ,...:: ',/,'• z II :4,L.Z, , ..:r'r- , •-,h,--- - iyar *,.-•- = ,,,,,.."Li ' ‘t tit.::,.....f ,'"..:,7-:•77-:'4,,.;;-•43-••• ,/' 1 l' • ....'"' ",'.. • . --, V ' '12'; -,,r.,, ,,,, .4r.s.,,,v ,?.?:, 4310.,i ••• '7,',,„-.1;2:. 11 t ,,tifipp,L „ .,':,.: .. ', 0.! i-C•:,',;ijiiiits:1S-:,:e0, '' ..''',....-...31;1-7-`li L'.' :. -,'.':' ' •4"-.-'"--7-1'c: SW 7 ,St •!.: .`" '1"' ' :-,-, , ' I 11,1 . -, q sa.w.E.ck,K.....„1aviNt,e,.."Y. .. . I• , • ': 11111# moms ,., 1,1' .,•-e",' • • •• •••••5•"•11,-,• -It •• ••,,,,eseiel•mmlea..,-. j, , ,,, •;i (," • „,•'..•,./: - I,Ah.. .,, „ •-II. •-•• I; ,*.- 'i•,,,, . _ .., ,..„ .„ , . • , . ,„ Legend PROPOSED ROU I ES EXISTING ROUTES Paved traregional 44latiggi. Multi-use traiirtegionai 41**40ma, il, .-- Multi-use to il,loca I Paved trail,local ,------ Bicycle Lane . 44 le Ari OF Bicycle Lane .-....-„,„= Signed shared roadway lftSgldth:retd Pedestrian ony trail id:sriaranai trail furer4iitscolv:r0 r .::.. Z 444:24 `• �'" , Cross sections 1fy Separated multi-use trails Roadways with bike lanes F .1: zit.f'4 y EX?STING 'AV wpm '! y 48?.,•0" ,,A. lik V it " " it.kiM ; - Ii- • ,slide ha ®..-. ..k v - a+•4y„: _- ;j.. Tt. ..a••t� :2 ^'k y 3'-G'' rr,'-G'` ` IG'-`J` '�` e : • Y,p f /- 0e: ! -gaff rRs.7.. s?,'CF Y 't°” 1 tui_ . tAka '4e4 &atisi znzi_ MOVED ottesS ION B'-0' r-D,.I II'-o' ; w-o' ^'-r}' B,,„E;> ATIU TWA Sit`UIK / 7 f eumauAva 32-2i la atria,a. rutn 1-mytt7MtInG ar4awaraWf?dmutS naps* <.< n, e..orE rar.Iihcqu It trsie,@ TWOuWAAY ROAD WITH BIKE LAVES r "Toil ktc0)11:3,i$Opeve,$4 teporma 2fraiillieT,!Res isms CroF1T- F-YtY fs„pa Ri 1-';IN1YiUIM PAVED li•IIDTA 4. a sai Y I' - n.it, ! tàn T -aa,ry I s-.ae:P.ar.4 LAve 1 rAaa‘z zta.t ras_ wsueva.,„ , '-Cg '-{�'�, 11'-t?” 11`-i" pja a v t ! '—G' / I,'-G" t IV-0* f 1h-A' A sEP ATEDMSULTI.1,155TRAIL TWO-WAY MAITWrAYWITHB LAWS14 -raNams:" ,.n..1" sea _.4a �tiatta3 y z+� ,. s paring ., Wes raga r4��l mtivi Regional Trail Connections to4t,„; • Green River/Interurban Trail to Cedar River: Multi-use Pathei ��< Along railroad tracks in Black River Forest, Monster Road to Naches ��1 • South side of SW 7th /South 7th to Shattuck Avenue South ' • Shattuck to Houser Way South Houser (along railroad ROW) to Cedar River Trail �zv 41 Cligifj:* • Lake Washington Loop: Shared use roadway and bike lanes • Bike Lanes on Rainier Avenue North • Shared use roadway on Airport Perimeter Road • Bike lanes on Logan Avenue North, Garden Avenue North (Liberty Park to North 6th) } • Improvements to Logan Avenue Bridge and Coulon Park entrance �ss • Lake Washington Loop to Cedar River Trail • Bike lanes on Logan Avenue North • Shared use roadway along North Riverside Drive, path through Liberty Park • Cedar River to Soos Creek, Lake Youngs, and Cedar/Sammamish Trails • Connections planned by King County 15 t4 SCS 1. Lake to Sound Trail System ',‘":141‘-'','•• L....�..... _ 4 - :: ,. '_,; South King Counts ;" .„.%,,, .,\,.,,......„..,. ;,, `:`" mom, :_ Non-motorize '' '; : ,;; .; I..fir'• r ,,nwv+,•';'=;`i Transportation , :..»; :e.+ `. ,.®,.^:.,. s t g r.:y' " Lake ToSound,c,und Trail System � .. �e.m''` 'k ..> rk>Re "� ,;>- ,__:��� € _ -:%'"" ri Y ''kf Map a-Twos Rivers 1.� n -�, s � • .. '! .T -��''t ,ter .,? .wi..s 2 ,•••:•,..=,,,,,,,i1----01 :� :• , _ „ , :+ i � `fit • mow} _ $',,,, '�_ ,, ( arr." t= f, '"+ ? ww, � °t 7..nre Y. Y.".1... +ti+.< _ t ,r...s.s #, `•' � Jl" .i - ',' -: .>•: .}� .s. ' `;„may,;•-9'x `o'�.f i..'s-_ -..._^ •1t' • - Wan w,'',,,A � 3 :�� �' ':'�5'v ' iii3�..aYn II :r: ;y- S tl i .11: ®pvdm £=11 rscral II �� :-;'...' «> ,� :?ate _ '” - . a,swatcnrcedun� ,.., ., , "<''s ;: .`,. 4.-- • it1, i .a, :-, (E} ,;I :=• '--',...1,---'- -..f!' •.f `,,C, S' +',,. -t' £i,i � w ;Y',4",_> r_ �', r�u-m. msn�_ „aa� .. k„ -;6 _._,,��~ meq', ~�r r �Y. ,._, ”µ -,- is '-, ~ , i:.' 3 'i - I1- t 'a cedar _Frc1 o ,, ,`r ..ww` ,, • • - . .,' 1'.; q 4,• .}.�.� __txmranran�nxi[punas� ,.iit, .a�""° 1 .r......_ .., '. ,. "yY;yyyu .F, k-3 ;}V, [t}3,}. �. !,1,!!...,---,4" ,iki..® % ,• 4 - I t Y. —.-,—;`-.i°�'• "• "444^1', `,--':',,,171'-'-i,' ••k 1,„1,. _ ' 31, �" .iar" • ia...a.+.., '£. „� ...ww ,s1; i",:,- 'i'I.' �A, `, --/ .3¢NT; . ^.7 ',►�"'`_•�,{'� a_I •,� �kc ;Roo raghre+Ytc�r . .! .;?• t Vw.; --,�` .1 > --, ,1= 5t+@cYm'sSvYr_ �'" :,.% ";:.«. ."' ` t3dm7taxfesraucaa ,; ...r-. .7 qYK sTi6O7 a1t99 t. ',_ .,,,°:. "�+.,-., - ::... +. I' samcntuyg-Awad ite yt,, _ - >,:n=v: '7:�,' '-4 4,a.u.i,M ,0.,'' - ryj„• -:,•.,, .'. i naCno rtmal ached .. :}�, f'': k 'i> "�`.'.uy,-N { ``'ti...'i'�4i�,. 'i 1` i•_,.%u:Pf F .6I',, '• ,Renton isi : }+ c: :C -r _ � � F �^ i+ .=: '`',*a -. _.L,' 1.2_ ''ji, • �:� :...<�"y��w•'."'t':=', .ia�<� �. "�.::.f:' �«..t. • =t'i`: ., ,^ ,.. � 0 Are�ssSiom .a.F 'd r-':� t '''";:.E:',....4,„:1,: 'L'# .'"4:. , `T 'tiVty;F _'£rF -� 21: km yup .r ? .....' ":,,, ,..,-,-,,,,:.:,, ,,,,,,...,,,,,/,„: ,;' t°�,.,,. .� , «as - i" a ,..-..a.�.�. 4- 155 7 IC � �i <., w ..:.,w, �-*.nw _ DaFwtraea'stcd 4W 'e � d3 'a^ Paha i ,"11,',.....-:-.. yN s $ ,r ,' suc u 9N1JC14i 7 q4t0 0.5 .p WI' ..amu s maas t itarfs�Bt r . .. �ypsr7> iWoRfversTrait'.';, 'b ...................... 'a ,... .. ;Z, Y�, nM » m� � .Y..� ` , .. ''''r--','".-'."1-4,',":' 7,' r .., o- L " AVit�.4r? Inventory � .4� 14 Alt-IV : Recommended ."........„ Routes ....., ,, , ,_.,,,, t.„" „:„„ RL`llt'Ot1 tHAiLSA IIICYCEE MA.'TTA PLAN ,>,, TABLE 1,ROUTE INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS . wtpnocE T3. ..pptciAzuirtAczs• CaD.TW TL lulutioretwPd MOM " .,...0.. sT;Tta TxgfsTSLtox r`",' HIGHEST PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS " ' T6YEMit5mum: iwt uc,oNt km4. ahr r4A `SAYrYnfvnirs4 SEkSVZtitalaipTt1"xn PA On P*41.4.4 ;, t� ' radatNTTisati. rad SAeagyunl+rralutd ust.i.i4 mats ww 1.1.1.e� 4 % ,. CONNettal1 Amite `uttsiaies.CANE "., '� ictidlosautLu,Twiaroi ''�,e*:or, -48 Faatr.€,t.Patlt reitrn, 4t stark as:rr,n its iTeU'P rvxNS TdiL Litt Tem r Flu ii4 dacmtra� a£Y.cuaYE MAUI:rsn a a bra rue w • :41 t,`. BLAU RIYERTRRIL Fipatian NaaenurSW' `'ratRh USE1:R RCM "'Yziledsel, 11.. bf TW6S 5T> hIL : fflulc 4 ,,„„ srt2 to:*mutt 5LPA�ir:TTP'tA.TI tµCtr66RYgtnt&FYt PTpatbintatnzi 0514444 F - "Crerlwrad t 716YY�PFRSTAdS1U5PP sccasla`r t_um:u , 13 trSilaraRtf4.l w41h §EPA^vtT.OSSLCTI tttyy p}xs°,a'es:ts�uBh TihTREET lrtnut' :Ns UETrsPAD fia:d ditt'TcrErttr„�,. btt5silt_- 15C'eic+ruim't rr ,, utP"Culi4StraiagtciiwSEPAATN1L.Tt P"r..zmtgura saeui"t .. * TAENUE sit4:maah„ UtP'ttiD Wrii,� Fnacuate, TWORIt'SR$11Vil4i 9hattutt RAMP! * Dd ...arX 211,•252222224,12 ':pdWCQI , [}� Y y MU 1RWaW$ Vitt rrtenuc sinal% gym w, 1laa RP»iAWAY " ;4'* r ;sratlA • t >• Tfd+LYt'i3YERST ILI EVrot{e Ahi`Tr�ln's42Fraio ue 1443 1LO strati-B SEP.4.?.�kTic!WAT1 New arms-xz1 32 �- 14104SBRtWAYSOWTN Ealr."a I la2dsrr.ETkSe 1 WETrtil 1 MR^nsu?2.etwt t • ¢ 6 IRRR,RCk4II� P Titmtet aatlPUlTawl . __.. re R, • ". '. i&iaNa7&lujialctRtill :te hip,: ;u?rsni... ass saptrusdmtttr-xuu tdA'Pt1'!N. Ftuepntr,umuv c+ EnaMva smut :'stapa. ,vai%pa.i MSSPIG3P4PS txnpiatol Paxil MT CREWMAN. Lai» p5225 0222215 25 Sap siNzetemi411444 4LPRCA.TTPLr AT/N1NAa3101104 eashr'glnn f222'asrx'.uay stag mash etc tem t141.tRRT,,SCrt •iesAltkgtun 1m 144 ,Nnnh 'gaw s WILFAEF eseuhrgtnn Noe �g'�_du.nNn PANEFIEiCREE1L"MIL Toistbtitsk " AWets ct 2 Ne exisalgNel mat;wa train 11P444tylivits.2Sta t4b1tt5h.W %I: Epi`olhrcok Wlttrititd ft4P.ta..id ben Ogled 25 Part 02.143 redt.elci tnemx P4ck,41e c irtt alto edismtl Pear!aTsa PTIVALL VANL1E PPT' SEitla1tn li ", 9IO 2PA .2 4ura�It+t:.;l whtt EXTEIViNk�. E:try#"k;e ingslh444.0 Ii.athftrtmaesOcts, SCT2ItllsrecT g+ nvrit 0acrass4.ar4#1,x LP:MLS sliucxttsyts c,,,,, PE;rt °itc-ihhm alit, P NunsedOtt4s4 lra LIBERTY NON Cedar NIesTTede iN tsiess Wes' St2 Flrtiispile iddnmod SEPA iTED.'LtTl hoad a3akeway arx CONNECTOR shlo-tly axessitras9h USETru4 MED Ntlese a tSeseenneat >attaty 'acd:414 c*'T 1 rnd 44awnve, 17 C^.rt, nhrG aVu,lh SISMCIAsTANN £edttseteettd;ssenrt"cttbn al to 0141og tm4 M441,71-144-414.44 Karrm.TtdN tiTrtirea; ' MtNN:NFALTRAIL 7:v44.4 ,-gdMi. 44.4x 4,:2n41a4ml@il^114!4. Wel:p.1 t :45 ttb41:1,,'.4 itt4eli:',,,,1 ;iditti:1:4 ..4 ,...4 iiif..$:.• .,.. .Atit * •ViZt.'" t.f":: 4 Example of Project Sheet *0, l...4...-::ivz... , . ,,0 •ii.•,,II:-4,1 ..,,,.-:c--*+ '-it x Tro Is..:,.pc-,ioiq..4.t,2=4f'4 WI,,',iegt .. . ,,..... , P4,,"..,.,,,:it:-,:„...:, .11.,.. r,--•4.....,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,-,;•,-.rift„i,,,,....„.4,,..., •ri i....4,45i,, ,,!, :4.4 0,4,4,„,... .,t•-;• •,-4 • '''- t": ' .11176poNett-hwnwraritears- isb: \ ,11,....:::.:V:.; , ,.., -.r Or.,..,,i4,:;,:rfi. •,,,„„,,,,,-,,......,,,,y1::,,.: . 1,2h,f 4 r , ..... -a- . - ,,...,4 ,,T;:k,i,,,1,...,,..:, , : !7,M ,.1', .,, „qr, ,,1,,,,,,,,,..; TA*010.--VER,,S,TRAI.—Li".r. 1 ,47,;„;;;•4t,".-: 1; -----.-" ,,,,- •",..v,',.•11,...•J.,.<'.. ,,F,-.--,- '.'",.,-... ,f....,.-j;'t•..,,v...!..,:,,,,it,...‘a e . 1. .-,-.7,•••.'.!- -,-..,.....4- A--...,14,..,..,.,010 - ,.., ! .! . ,•'•••••;,--.,,,,,,.; , .:':'-':•7:1,,:!'‘j:i%'7„•-:.;P;4.f.a::::',4•tY.".,•':•••:47,i•7f.tY•"`‘P',':',:-,,f,,t1:/t',47.,7,%• . 4.':' '•:•'2 :.•,;:,,,.::••.,: ,,,, ,:.•,,.;;;;,„'.;,:'.:. ••.-:::• ,'-•,i::..,.,,L•••••,:.• •,4 :',.,,,t '.47.",!.,•:::., : 11LACIOUVEIt:RILROAD:.R.OAV.TRAIL. PROPOSED SW t•t:=N:';',;',,7,2''.,,-;.-', :;; .,,,,,, 4415.,,,,,,...„.;;;., , -,,!!Y--- .... '..' --.•';;C: ,:;11:2-',-Ii-T;:;',-;2,„,k.,,-;---:-'1'.'7;n.4==.‘,40! ,.:," ',,,•'-' ! (>6. 1,,,m.-„,nd 19,600e,r;goo s..*-30.N4)04•0414.4.: W S;',3k4.4;.••• \‘' 1 --,„..,.., . 4.077;74.....t4;,ii;.,. '‘.-.i.:•tYtii.,:--, ,,--i;A,•,t,,,Fi/i;i`4,•,?4,.,‘:,-2,',,A;1:;•-; " ! i .f.x..4.;),'inall. I • "' - - — •• -- - -— , „,- '—k',:-,,,,. ...-;,;* -,..,,.„'i;-.- .;,4,;:i ,--,;;;,..,,;!•0.s';,,;&,p:-;,-.,-,i L.'. ..::'.",::jni4.0.1.7 ,,:'•'stt°,t' 4--' .-',•,: .'i'''', !r:--411... -.'.,: --.: 5 .)"•,"!1t1:4 444 ,-p,4..•-'(0-- ,-,--::.t.4:-,:;t•-4-::<"-•f:--':'',,'',l4iiAff:t.,-,:2,-:,-.1.',;,,:::0,4,:•.•,y:,,.,,',.-.....,•7:I• iiii 1...f.,r 0- u ,- ... F:.,u.--,*,- o,r,a.,,, 4fo .t, • :4rt' ''4:It - ,' ,. t: l• <.,,,,..•••,:n•:...'ttIF. 0..1.4-':.••,rt' . - • .••• •• .. „ ,-',..:.'.7.:Vt.::„ ,•4••,. •'•••', , -" •,:•,;.• ' 1 1 I •::, '', :101;44,4",••:-.-0::'V.',, ;i.,. ' t :4••'•r.:,'" : v•,,i4ii.im..,.:(1.`,,.:4',,.':,Hi- . ltpu:gb..•path-paita14141:41.141ingiaat Niri.-thai• $unitn 1 ..f.,••'•:4%11,1 -, ', ' ......„-', -=•, i ..' .• ..t'..,,--.*:;r1V,:...,0-.. ee' ' ., . ., .,...... ,, .- ,:.. I ," • .7 i'" ',. ,..' .-:W,y;.1,-....-.:.,.':-.::1 -.,...,.. - '.a,...;i1,.«:.,', ,:., ,', ! : faitiLti4:4 ii41041*vo,,,v ..e'',:.---,;'.•1.-2 •:jt::.••••„1.7-,' • ;3''''' .4 ,.. -: -.. ,.-•,- .,.. '4;•••'2 t•:)4. •4: .-''''':i.',', :' s:; 'N., :-.''.,-,-„,--"-:-.-1;'}c.Y.1 '•',.;; 2_,_., -,-..--1..-',7,-.,-1 , 'i i • A ,.\-..,;_e,.,,,, ....,,„, •1:-:,,,,,,,.„. _.....,..< ., .„,,,,,,--,-_--,-----------,•••••• •1G-13,-; ,-:.,..[[ -.. .J- :: Wx.•474-f-: ' A -,-,,,,„,, - :,•:„.„,::.,--..„-,,,,,,, t ...: •• , y.,,,,,,,ok:c.,„:4-..•,., . ., ,t , .14,1*.t. .•!4„. it. ::i'-att'tr;'',:::,,,2*4•-' 5(0.• -tit', '"'4F" ! 1' ':i •0.;-...-''..-a,'.1,:: t-•:,'t VT., 1 •. ,iit,", 4.31,:,:t., —.,,,4 : :',..r.,-4:,t1J,V`'-•4 i• Y'- -'''''-'•,',1 -'• "t:''''',tttm,"e, •••tt : ''•,:.• 1 ?.: 4,4,44- ••,:::,tt"•• qt5...41 ..ttt-,',.• 1r0iC:R!d ! *pdo..*dpfizitti-*4:0441,:p *t•1: 1.;4 i:<!...;,..F,L1.4z...4•14 4 t•:;••••'1.::t;ttAek'-: . , „ • ,,:,..• _.„. ,, -..-,,,.:-,- „, . . „,...---..•....... .. ,.. __._, „.„_....__„,„ , - „It••--.4.:-..' '' TYPICAL SEC CROSSrIAON )(s . „......- , ..- ..•- • - : .. , . . . ... . .. .. . Conik•et,:ion•y; '• •:',101.vAtetit6ic.vi.K.09p,, ..k5 , . . ".W.•:.. •, ,: :. - • RIGH 1:t0.:--K,'-X . .... .. ' PAkKS-AND SC fOOLS:Tort.D,ent Pildi,'019c,k: .°4.,•410+14-YAR:1•14'• •?fr: • RI.,ine..6'...-POft...I.: :T T4 1 i•Se..04P041.17F6tiice10941,011.03,.E.414.1:10: •,..... . .. .. .„. .. . - .. TitAlt,Si,Cliista Wo.ti,'Irtteriirlti.1.8ftip.k•Rivv-r.• , . .,... ,„., t • 4-- • , i Siiiiii*.pyik TOi1;13.tirreqtt;i4lok.RI vt),• . 33,4KElANES:i:MO.itcY,F041:sw e • .. . prq:pe.,:f .; :Pi:tc4i.:-iitcaiRtuv :li Bia6k ttitrr:R.iixiriain 1,'),JEtt. , ,...• ,,,, • •. ,..• ..,..• .,.„..,.....• .„......... ..... . t: ',-, ,Y „,„ ,,,,,,i , Ik-,-.-;:illv.t,e.,,,i • "str.trtote foriiivi•ialairld viiii ',:, tt ••'„ ..:.t. , : ' . . , 40t.• .. ...• .. . • •::•M`,.497-.;4:;:SE. . , ' •„ •CezIt..4.;0•,,r4i4.-..9;id , Po$siblt isrmitti:Oriztizlici i Clii-oiEi.li.".3•16.4,44;., ,. 4 .. , . rx 5401)LDER, .: , 12!'.;,'OP . •;'1,:.:.SWOULPER , • 18 .:... ....„ , � * F s= Nei � a 1 Ra Evaluation Criteria ft 71' e t • • Safety . j.„ * # y : • Accessibility • Continuity Et Directness may. • Connectivity/ Linkage • • Regional Trail Connectivity • Trail experience • Sensitivity • Concurrency • Funding/ Construction Opportunities 19 4A. ztf ,,k1u, ,,...„..„....,...,,., Evaluation Methodology :Z47,•ic, ,, .ar44.*i4,•„:4: „„7-.:. •.,:if. .,* •''''•''';''',.,',''':4,--t.''' . , .'''..;:, •'•':..:,i'.t?.7 041 EVALUATION SYSTEM ., .- . . . , , . Negative or ' 8pTIOivh?t , - ::4iiotiy, 4- • , •„-„. ' . _ , , 1-- , , .. , , :in S yfficieptc' - - , ‘ridsqlvo-:; positive ta: irfcieri*lohLI Z.:•• i•-• i „. . *-iall i ' . • $;., '>,.'''' .4c''''' >,;.,-' ':Ztit:, ccul • ... •- 0 ' . II— }=., %CC 1=' ,--."." • w w; 0, , , b.. ' , 'T....tic b g-< • ' 1):S , ,,§. cri-:, , is: _, . . . . . . . >- tp,- Lu .' Lu : L;):i 1:-_-- D-, Z -le • • i: • t. yi,'-, , . :0 . -±... ,PRobs5a 0 :: . ' : il RANK'. PROJECT' FROM/TP. - ' IMPIPVEMENTS., ill: <' U 'u F''''' : ul- `37'' u , u- i COMMENTS..:. -:. 0 . 1 _ . , . : 1 Any Trail .:Fil§h-t b4hk;o. ,..: ••, .• •,•... .. , • MiSti00e.44 'soya I, 4, i iii:10,,, : , ,• Illb ' - - -41 C) • , 1.6 ttbalik, •. . • .. .. „ .„. . , ;•, ,• • . • ; Any street ,:Intersection.A to Bike lanes '0, 0 0 a 0:111"10 ' 0 0 ,]1 • , Intersection i*I'vOcte.s. - — i' :- ' ' '' ' ' .'" ' '' ' ' ..::— ''' .. ... 20 ratrri ,..:A.- it,„ 2,,,, , .,....„ .,,,,, Tr-4,..T>.-8 �y Plan Outcomes 3 Trail and Bicycle Master Plan i. ,,,,„.,, ,, Ni , £6v • Proposed policies, policy changes . k 1.1t. ,‘`,,,;t „.• , Y.,,, s:. )1..-i' ■ Recommended routes and cross sections „� � • Evaluation criteria for project selection �.a c $, • Prioritization of projects (trails and bicycle 14- i routes) • Design standards • Signage recommendations 21 b {"is Plan Outcomes :ii.o.#„ ,,,,,$.,-,. ,,t,,, :,t., Z-1 �� ,� > Trails/ Bicycle Mapto Include: y • Existing Network - ct Bike lanes, designated shared use roadways, 4 t. r. „441:., soft-surface and hiking/walking trails 4.1 � '" + recommended routes and "use with :")'£ . ��- � caution" routes � • Grade changes A. - • Detail of downtown area niiirri • Printable/downloadable map on City website • Safety Brochure 22 t. w w Trails/Bicycle Mapix ,... . . . . .., .„. _" . _ ... . . _ . ^ � . _ , .. tiNLtf:.4.tt. L___,_—_,......_: ` -.,..,...,,,......__ '..,? IELA D .41..--4,—;' - V' Gettirt AreuridRenton osaFoot dmdbyEtttie a •i41 Contact , - .�x�"` •�i. ' .�. ..;:i ati:a Y..$ box . a; • �. �`.. 6 =,+mm. • ��•` .,z n. ..s. �.�' :moi.. '✓`i•` 'a ;Rowe� `-�-q�+.� E -jai`; ---- i' — .. • r _ - ne = � �, f. "z "�F `a "p ,.., ar r yam • e' 1 es'--=° 4i''''-'---- .: .a-.-. torte Around Dad-entaamAA mon °rips forSa c Cycling { r.t {, . r s . ......',','.:7'2-1,. <s 1 :r:, q,Te .iilZi:S'a • • :lx' a, x^ k _ p II • • f..=3 - ^ L' Y 2 ` 'Sy , A `` f �1 - -,. --... amm-<.c vxi§ aT ^..,S `; .tS3 . — ++' _ : :.. .;$ z, _ •:•,.•q t;:•°rbe:f5'a1.q rn4- -,4,,..,'1,,,,,:.. !!!!,',°r, y IA 2 .�„� ; ; ' . „ Yf, � -irr”" am.:=M:,---,_ _,- _R ,,_s<...r.- _, ,_, • , q rr�; ass+ Arteriaall$twea , 13i0Clc/Aft -_ Dasirtnrted Shared Roadvaa tiff-road n��r, uatbt�tratl Raocrmtndpi htkente ell ' ra . - ,. ._... .. {. Gr"'Y'�IfC? it1-.. .F3.4 4'fr4l€a`i-e- s' `•RENTQN TRAILS, KE) • {1seAvltttcaut#an rout' • r BIKEWAYS GUIDE MAR- • nb` u}derar'cut ? F iir4;-‘„:;,;:: L ,, ��+ll 1f+ 1qr Next Steps - Public Participation , .1,...4,„:, ,,,:,„ otz , ,, ,,, r -- x. • October 1st - Mayor Briefing #3 „,,,.., ..,. - ...4,,,,,., .,. ,t • October 2nd - Non -Motorized T rans ortation, 1,..,::4...-,A . 0,,,,,- .- ,,,. - .,,,, ;,, ,, . . .,,, ,: , Committee Meeting #3 27- • October 14th - Park Board Presentation #3 I- • November 10th - Committee of the Whole .. -.4!,,,,,, , ,.. i„,,„:,,.., : i,,,41, „.:-__.-x,,,, Briefing #3 >'° °�>y-1 • November 12th - Open House #3 at Renton Senior Activity Center • Council Adoption - December 24 * • ,:r(ffi;‘ ,cli-,:.-4,•+•vt'.11,re,44?q,*„.„, .,,,otrelt;1 ' Zi*Att,U, S.'..il'3M'4:iT0**:1W;Pr.f."*'-'41(4''''''''i''.,.,44i0,;3rtililteiljws.,4-4:it:*..74.4.4.'"11*.:'•;FL 40 • • • j ' e. ' ..'''I' • .' ''' ',,.:::,': .'.•..:...,:,: f,,,,0 to•7- -, ,. ,,,•_,' , .', ' :l'V,. '.. .....b ::,,,/***1.447 ' ' ' *. 'Illik: - . 1 ,,, ..,-;:\tik--. . -..;•,-.i)y-. -,.',' '''',,•:',.".]--' d s ?q �.mi it 5 'l 1 y 4 S 6, 3, 5 f 4✓-7' nevi (. Eat R . w +7:4:7 E 5 . rpf N Of0AA1C - te 61S 4L k)1(14V(4 0- 5 tirj it3/7,0 I'1,49 CI , ,..A• " \II tiv>. 7\V ,.;,,,,,,,,et?,)-gi„.,,,..,,,..':*4,-. . <,... -,„/ , . ' -.V•i427:.:-;;;.e . #;;,i..::.;„4. RE:r4106,7"V"e,'„,6 a,„ ,, ,,,, :i.,' • -4.:'„,N,.). *.' '..,'«,;,„ '.64,100 ,,,:4,40,,,,, , ,4,, , , .4•1*- ,' ---,4',z--',4k,4,41,14.0: ,.-41,4:-.i:,4-1,,,I,1:" ofj 4.,;*.4 ,t- ..: :: !'.•: t,..'T...•,i14, •,'„;,,..p,',/,.,'',,.`\.'''N70**.- —,s' ,' ,'N' --'-'''''',',4,..- ''''1'%.,., h''W:ate xf etittio . .,•::,:!...,,N '.-06.10104*Pi I: A...P. - • :`'.,4 -44.,..,,:. '' i Jit!..1,,,0,111gal.'' 4,,,:,:i..„-iz,*;eotii,.:.;:,:t.. . -- ..,,-.,•:,:,i,,,,,,;.-itT. ,., :. -,,i,4,.--1,:,,,,,,a.„,ker.--4,(. 24-4Alt ,!44%4444V,,,,‘ 2.:P#4510,034°°'.., *1!4;':-.,.',1tiy$41A.,lit'if,34'.. :',..t,,,•:,•:,1 1:.'' ,'::',',,rg,A.ti-;oz's4; ',:- :aPtfiqtl-i.1:44';"'-'*vA4V, .. ;.•.--- -;',,A!;:', .-.c,.:7:4.-..:.c,,zgli,,f,g-Ak'..1 .:4;';/ -.".. :.- '......:::.':, Alo.,:41vt.„;..!,,:z..... * rx,lcoNiiiNilt,194,10,44,A0 —,. li,',',4''w.tra'‘ A1::4"- ItitiliOtCOSii,,Ittiltt! t; '''f2,:t.4k1,..1.itliWt'44124 *:." :s,1424..&,,.. ,,,,,A4.- --4,4-0t N,,-,--;v.,4,• •,4,4.%.*ter,s42r,At22,41.em-- .4:'-'.:.":::.44--:',4:-;,:'.'!'eit.U.',;;Ait,i4e4t:43:04,-;:::;,4..•...,-,--;':',,,,:...:;.,..',..';).: i ',4:.•oViitg'' 01:009j: '',4;::.:44.1,4',044..ire;24,1-4=41erq41 .. '''..-;.:.;'''',414.',4;.a.letteWif.0.4,Zfiii*EiNg3- '4.S•i;;.:: :,....ii';': ;:.:• .:7.4,1_40, 2,k,224,*4,,k*Slitg,‘44:4:4',i4.,,4N2?'4,,,"i;,„...2eirilf;',•\.•tii-44,444arits'fi'''AklitA4 ''' •,:..; .;:ri;,.'",-''",V•T 244'451,'.".:.-k=1".,:,-‘44,r;frirkm,i,•-.4...- -!'... •..ai,,,44.4x4 l',r'c-'4U•lirki-lai:n)ic4(.915.V-4c4.ba;,,,-,,,;:2-10414 , ...u1,-,,..:.*0,:io: oititift.141Z14,9Z441},e-iv,v10,i,,,..!::4,,,,m,,,i4-20.,,,,•,,,,14;24;:A§.1 to."3,,.....,----1.r.,,•_•,...,-,,,.---::;t4,--.57—.. .-Artis,,,:t*Ati:41,4A• liff*--,,,,•-•i•A,;cv,t3/4 W„,'":,,..,,:::..'!:,, ;-: , ..*,.9.,..,...,.,...,3140.4.,4.Aitralitz*:,',,, , oroo:rolisr,, ,-,-ip-.t:::::51,:-., -A,., 14t..:',.tgl..iii2,Q .•,,,.,,,,,a04:4:,13,0,w,,,,. 7,-.4.,0,-,-,,,:4:411:44**ktNrw4„.k.-,,,,,,,k‘:1, .:„ ..,..__-,„. . .7......:::.„,.:. ,,,,?• ''t:;-::... .,,,,?,-,-,...;:::.,.1,..,i,,-;:7,.t..-,....;;:. , ,.,7Ts,,itottr. 1,..•,,, ;‘i- ;eAkVioro:, 441'tz:!t;*Pftt,,:, --K,, ..,,,,Y:'.-if7,,,-'.....,,,,,:.:,.,:rf,,,,,quiq---- • 7,-,1,74gagov4,44.1,•.7,.„,- 7,,,-,•„„ 1,,,,:, .44,4.4„...,,,,•-4A Alt,c'',.0.3430. ••,'&4144...i.,,,,,, , .3 3 'Z.;.".'.:".';','„:,:',If::::3 ..q,D):; `,i':;,':‘,",' ;'. •?.:••:'''',' •.c ',3',..),',:3,:.•43::.•• 3?‘',..,....,' • • • •3,,"„:.,":':,c'' , ' "„‘-: -•-,-‘' 3'(•!3`3';': ,'Js'-js,'‘',"q:', "-:,''':::-?,t,'‘i'';','-‘,.,,•?:',•‘,'',''' '••3'‘,. ‘,• ,,-:,'‘3 ','''',:t'„--',,'::•''', •-',• '','••'•':23- •3,•:•:, • ',,','',3','''' ' ';',' :•‘•,'•,'‘',:';';, ,1•, ' '' ,!‘-:',„. .'.- '::,,' '3,'",, I . ,''','•"-••• -•--, '',- ''','::: ::,•-t', -, '"1::3 •,-C,;',.",' :,;,,!, .,:'.;,,,,! :',;:t",• ,z'i‘;°'!=:>',:S'' ''"‘',',''-3„:"h3::,,, ,, E-•",‘,•,•"' •'.1:',?,i';',:','4;;',,,,,,''.:-.3 ;i:•', t:j"C,,,-;:::-,-.:,: „,-,, ';,/ ,'-'`,::',;•;'•ii,„•-'',..,',,iriti'' 1.3,,J l',.:,. '::',y'::::,•' !!''''''',\''';'-.42',.1:::',';-,, ;.., '-',-:-:, ',,,•,, ':::•':' ,;;•,;;;;;:' '-i•qi:ti:t. •:igZi:;: ':::;::" DeStillatIP!14M' Y;:',4,:"'.3, ..,::,:10•••;, :::: ',' ''-t::'.•:''':''';'AOSAlifietideileritAtiltiqVA:04- :rl'" ? ';, ;;: `•,•":;'' '-''1',1;;,';,:c:•'il':' ,,,',,,T,'''V'e;•:;4,K1.4 ,,-.'. ‘',"..:/,-„:, . • ,..‘: ...,.:‘"„:,,,-,,,;`,7'z. 6 , C 'i ',4',:;'!-,.„ ,v,,,,2' ,:':,:e.',:':. ,.','; '':' ,;,(..', -4,,',',•4,': 1'',?;', -,!,',. ,,,::';'/.'(* •.:2"'‘''.,'•.-' ,',.-4A,,,q,•:-. Growth Management ' . "ActPtoesion for edelisttia# mylhtcvchst 5, :<•,•::: 4,fitcorp orate hicy,:cle-and pedestrian ...,: D.iiie-i-,n, eigihnriioedsil'‘l7y,IcO,hneci::,„#r. ::ets1.i pgunng ntoeaeh' QAlP - - idUaliS andl*S 0--6Onsider approaches that Orolnoc ''••-:-'': .,,,, ''' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' 14'Integrate aettyl.tY'kii*4#,#h.1:-':,';,IS, - --2 - surrounding neighborhoods .. . . • -, physical acti.vity , . , ,. .,,,,,,,2,,,,,,, • , .-,, ''''- -;':.''',;::'-,?.,•'..?,-;,:.:-. „ .. „ . , .• .;.: .' 4;' '; '- • '. '''' .. ': . .7'':"..-.i`.. '....:'::. i - •'... .... ... . . --.:-!, g=;ZEZ,dlocaldescinations t :41 ''417: :"' ",,,,i li.4.:4:"G .6,1‘§i rq.,.. Background '',''.--''f'::',.'-:::',4';',,,, . ,.::.:;:,,,•„..,„..:.„,„,,,,,,,,i; 14'aCZili Z.t ,, ,'.'..0 ‘,,,f.:, 'lc';'''''.:,':'',,'4%,,,2A-e,2.6,2•t44,u ;24:: ' Iiiiiiiiiinniiing','1'','":,;',APN;rZz 64'''4' ''."-Ir ,0i -- '' * '-- ‘'-'' '' ii;,..idT.ng, Ixt., MnStiteeid PailtsIMPT',",;‘,.4.. • 4,.4''•J,,, :• 4°, ‘, r'.4: 1,44%;*v.,44'IN4:0t;1,..i.', ..mudngr""s ""n"/ty.i& '`::',. ErOiliikeililittS,ndopted kl?..„,:on01,.,!#1,9..:",.4,,,,:, „,,.,,,. gif .•••kZ'i-t:,,..**.''.:1!.,;,. - .-- :.',`,z72P4T4-7,7,-. : : ; kii,' ,./2•;'?“,, 4,,,'- :".:.;;;,.-s.'':.'”,',;"‘r-''T'05%',' ''''-''''''''‘ilein:''''''' '' 'Ft,1".'!::::4,,,',:,,,,-4.:7.::::',41. ',.ti9,ii4''.=' 2,..V; 4';' ''i,:‘,0 finnspottition SySteliwir $100000 federal :w,,,,)9 ,$ :t„.- ;.,:,,, ,;i4T44.5'4:,' ,-;.t.„''41021". Iii::.",,Y1 •'.7,"'''' ,•3;•-:- ,,,,;,,,,,' ,,-, ,,, k•,1 grant to'create a ttrfRoute •''.:' 4' .1.,,i-tiii.,,Nyover•474%;c ,*.,02,,,„....,7e-Y=4,-..a474=',Etp5:260 ‘', ,:--dviap,-:',.,-1.•,-,,,-.;--,:,.::i,„ ,',., ..-- .-. &,:,-':-...',,,, -.' , •• , eiti..,,,-4,;Ai,,4,-.4.,7441x i,,,•-,;„,,tr li*iltetity:'-ist‘'-he lidb,ortlir,,e'a dialartrailthe 'Cedar River Trail,Lak4 yenshing4T LoopTrail,. '',i1:0, ,C,iii.,.:$4,1...:':::4-..tr ,,,, 71,.,:si.,,,7,-, ‘-:.-,-,!•:,.,:llt.Le, ii.:, •''' ., and the interurban Trailo;!!...;e:; ,.* 1.g.,::::V::,,,;b:.....—,...:....:.',. **4 . , * '' . 7'.1 h'khylift"Y?" .d.fr naley _ `i'Yt -N,-..0 -.,,I.P,,S'Y'L.L'Ill ---Y4P2-P;;.33,,,4''''' !:•k'''''''''J'A•144'31,§ :9:'''‘'':.:::;",e,,,,,trptt'i7: '33*...,;, 'i.:,,, •:'•i An integrated aad'coiapreji,e,n,sly e planning effort ,• , 'Y'il'.4:*..%:ffeAst114..ii.t -•.-';'.•,7", .4---,4.,A7r27:4,,,,;, r .7.2.,-,.4, 'vif • is needed.,4, ',,,,,,' , • ,, . , ,i. , , ,,, , t2!--.•••.44;•:421.1441kir4S..-4 P' .'z''''•; '74'"'" '— ''''''''''''' '''''''' .',1. 33.i4:?,43:1:::12411a40.40.tstt 1 r K ",'• '=.7,,,,"'i';';' "' za destinations and connections "''.,{Y, S^ am= trails and bicycle maste,Plan and 1 3 a :; _.�comnmemguni2"recree£ior"ja"t'trips ,y� -41,,,,,,"4 '>`•` lora ¢ ,",TI:',..!.' ""�'...,.,"r „t"' r,,,,,,.'„,.?.. W l,:-.c.<g(DmWfltlbndtasa ' •t ''I'' ..,r, ' tx „,, bjecti est1 ,e A, ;a .lemma � . £ ,t: ,-Process ,, upd f�,„ .. ps k b { rr 5 6;v (j•,4,„6.i.,.•„„3.,,,,,,,,,,-?4,,k,,a ;,£ .t �, •i-.-...:,-.-:,...::7:: ,? » flecommivjaaiicns. .< �s: �iS ` ::''''1,:' "' j=3+G1YM '. :.i ` �s mak` P�MuteAu4; } ^ y' E-Std Pk' ''" rug r rr".o. .' ;,,- `c s ?" k' a u 4e"` ':';:.'7, 7,: 3 9, ,n: '''.�, S e, a:"t 4,-•,:,-„,...,...„.4,,,,, •,_, P�, evaluate existin 3eet ork: • ; iF, °.,�a ;:w' ,;. 3 ;,":::y:;;,:• '.3x'tt , evaluate le�aik,v..ans Go -,..,, ,,,..aGMPtt5] «..z. '^ masterplansche (e,2"\i '• ' ``^', I dAs n„7,,¢vUsM 5,,,ia.:::Mi ., 's'': Pl"`'4YR s• ? 'hMlt�.T:a T,,,.. 47.„1.„,.. 4,„. ,, ,. a ,..„,„?....:...,...1.„n; 1 a M uses a : . X a im na Ym acuutamadort;;,«• a 1.+ + •:....7..:::,,,'*. ' -mae:Ae.,ry avw+,m awe.., . ,. I4{£tpr�N,--:,s0:: ,•,Pn•;;• m r :. 4 y ;.ra is as :.+'nn n. `' 3 z' y u a l''.- :_a..::',.e si fi.:4 ,,,nd.cumpiwlpr4lRas 4, '.-z!.,.-1., 4. •_ n t a�+,�+Ed'`s$ ,, `. ;. ,* , jrwli Nii,21P4pq��•?",i01.t..s ."m�a�e:,na�r...%row«n•__:x r i °� r.s 6 r� Identifypreferre'4,0,br� ?,:}.; auJlgotc*£tipn a•i. . era+;.amv;,�.h, a"`• ;,� k `,• " *: € ";; :=•sahtYttndRtrozrtmvdRkroR 7 µi;aaaysbdf,_ -t wu�ewalu.,.�r«aA;"'aaintayww7aaan,<.. . c 6� ;G •• a I< .w„...e�:artwaa,a..w,.ur+�...a�t: ,� ••; ''�:^.'SSM � '7'..,;>';',` q .: -r e' �,„,,Ny,,,,,„t.,..kMrasms• utt 34 }K:.''' ;�3rteniiOnrrckuweaenw koff!nd - \'•”. W,1 't t, 5« tu"de:'47, ii.i25€I' 3,a4uu!==7,,, : 1 tk ..1,:, Provcsedkwte's `''= v K't*3 r ° s, b�cCPenNuiee N�aluSUu{airerta 3 .� , t�,> e=.:xat. ...—,,as , I z., ,z,,,',„',,,-.1', ,.A. ,•.w ,Ensure«co den ar 'd roman :. „u „..........,..5.1.„. ..,,,..:.„;„ .1.„. *.t,.. ask'¢.'. .-•-lam=": a' M,o,...:„r.,„.„-•„,,,„:,, sp inuseisandsapphrpose3 •, ' kx>e ;..w �” E'""a"` z'vi"°°''a ” .kruC`mt` %h`4=' ?C w w riantise Am: o, t a 3 ' m.e�armbw l 's a» .,?".,‘,11: � a ax "C •`S+I, .. '=.'a4 £ 4 ^'1:'-i '"a"" I%':��'�7i ..P,'".!.?'"",hod S......Nou.ZC4'a I Ta'sk••4'tlreFx7rui13&8kycksAestervFaq;, 3 " .,',4,::" 1,'"'' 5 , a rta a s # ,", S ; . £ r ye.-:,.:!„,4 .i:.0..! 1,iriipraemenss ,' 6 "=v �fe. 3...,.0'au.>...:,i.;#i.; :'t •` :s. 1 b''i, .','" ; z` 'I ,f i __.„.. ---.:.4.:-.^:-7,4:•.-.4. •,,i1 --..-- „......,'''''',''.v...., '...',',...,,,,,s...t•-74, ; amflr.l.r-J7i4,1k.,,,.:V4ry,,,,1 -4:'1. , ' .'••,,,-. .,•'• 44" 4...‘,...04..">•.v..1.• =, ...-.:,-,r. ,_...-72;";i.-.4.4.;=4••',`,"i4 ''''f,,l'rs,'.1.•‘.74%;,+,';`..,"4:, rt., i:-.5.,:',44,.7:::::.,,:,.',i.'",,...*:..,„' h14:1:4_10::,iti,?:. ',',:-.1'; tl.%.,'• s . -;,'"4.?:4-4 _.. .._,' iv,tti• , .. ,*,i...f,...,:i.--i;.,-,e...„#4,,Q, rFrals,..x,i,.;,-:-. ! .1‘,..-•!...f,:::.- , ''''.."1 .'*.'''''''''...'' '4f1.4'.*.t.6•rtirbp;‘,44.:,,,,,,,,,,,,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,r,..4‘,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,, fr*.,•;',''" ..,';.ei.-%R i iie rill n*^1*:`,4`11,, ''-',.'*.s.;**..,,til.,.'t.'" ***,`..7`, .*.4**.' ., e,...,',,,I*;,;4*TE:t ' .,^* ‘' \* i -,1-.4:::: ‘,!**.:;„*,Ist;;,-; `NE,„:.,`..--z,1 Ig'41''''''141,1,'"'-i!".14':‘,.;...0,9*..91.*-ciiiwivnel!T.I.,p:11:Vir4:..'.- .:,4`...:'-:::41'7?!.',•?:::?''..'„ii,4'.i:::.:'!'L'ii Ij 11,1!..".k 7:-..'''ilio:tiv11-." ,c,4.4,04'DO)Irt 'f'..;;I':: i 4 j ''''''" N'ttfl.1%•• •-rf,--4' ling LO--=,........./10'.=•‘, kvAt 1„,,, `=t4. ..:.• 4*.i.•;•'Nitta -e:kt, .-.-Rentor,A,.. ..,...1.,,4-0 ‘-jootots..,i. .0 k "1 ......54i:',.:••:...'...:;a:t.[Jr0,9..„911..44'Orert,Trd-11.,',1:':F1;-'1,17,4 ' ' -411I'll 7.'''"ji: • ..,,i.i....,:;,.... ...,-;„0-.-, ...,, „' )-'.,-..,‘ _i., ,:i.,,,,,, /i-157 ri '.1,••:. ,'.....to cbglar*,1‘..;',....-*;liOn3-::ja, ' ' s ,',i ..:,'%*.-,Ii •.1,4,1.'..;tt:. -4.x...,:ttiting 9,R ',y.. . V....4,' , . ,..‘..'..- 6'n''t;';'''''''''''," I'''. '. k'1'''''11, 1.“ "r1-'11"\41,-'1'1 ,...:, .i.'.**4:4,44'4444-It.ter..11?„Ir.ti•-..:10,,:,.=, - .,. " ,,, ., .., ,,,,q,,:.... -. 'i': "'''I''''''%'''e'::' 4:1:."e.'t::* . ',11'43' :'!'''' :CT),.' 1 t.'''''''''' !,,',';'.., ,r:11,.."Sh,o,,,,,,Iv.s,".-'litiesv 1,t, -- * * "... --,.1,,.,*..-1.4,,,•;,,,,..-, '',';5! * '.1'. ..* .:'.. .'", • ,A''^,Aill.:‘,to,'''..*- ';''.1;' ,' .4"*.1•,...,r*'':*.,""i,..**4*-111 fa c 1,. 4 *-4."51.i, ...* ***,.''''tit'. * ,'t** ‘..,*' ''''*''' 4,**. 4 ter Is • ,,, ,.- • ,..;,,,,bso, .,. •ts.=,. .., p,--0' ...1. .. *,•*?....:•,.. i,:;,:io, ''''\i‘i i 4= 'I ,-,'-',4\14.1\,.\ 1:•-•,,-`,•,«:;..L`^'.'Ong.,, .'`-•ft. t',...,'..•°•"'AX *V,1.4".:.,, ..-..• -%.4 4= ., 091St •"' "......;'.':' ti.= 'I".'''‘.44; I:. fr, -,.--.i.4" ,'C4',,,,',4 ,',..4.‘v.\.. ',.K.7...ithrlroar•rl-•.• I.- '-1 44./- s ',-.„ ,!..:,:a.„.,,,-,......':z.•'3- t, *.J.,,,.^*# .V ',1;'. •t.*•*;i' '-*.".,mt'lle-a...***.* k t'f----.c,,,,‘,.4, ',;,',-,‘„, .,...„,,,, ,,.-.4,i••41..v: :z....v Pt 1,,,„ 1i. =,-"II:: .',,4 s',',,'.'-'''''‘''''&,-•\- ‘,,:14-',:„., ,12')',4**X.%::., • a, irr - ,m" r,',...i' -'":,- 4./ .:1-477,---2 rf,'‘-4. : '-'.:.--,-,• s. ---i".4'\ • ' f'../ ''''. '`, , . f;:',1,-;:if;i: ,..1 %,,i, '.",,,t -----1- • ' 7,.---•;-, •..,-,i,ii., -..v 'v,,, ..-- _,,,,.?,.v1, ' 1,‘' '. '-'").•.4",!-eriterit,-,%., ..'---:..'e, ...,' . i ''"`" ,1,-4p .-r.,„-..dhia . ..-, ,r.•-..-,-„,..,4,...,,,,,,i,„,,,....., - -tis,.-,47.-: .'..1;1,.,-•;• ".. .•*„..".. ..;,:-=0-4.„.1.•',...!..4,t;!"..it'L-r- *.'','',;,.:,' , . . .•%'47:: •' ' .,, 7---,N#A, ‘ ps., -• ifs.:.. ::!...if, '-ims14 , '.;1111.4'Saf"LliY•il.13f1 '''';•.;:.-1*-irjeS'.....‘:'*.'•;2;.."4..-1:".,:.'11.-.;A=s;'..:.*•:'..:.': '..".‘,..,,' 8:ID i re cL,, --• .,„',..4.':..t,'', .,...1.:.:'' 1.+`.4, 'tintl ILYiky444i:Mae-, ..-,,,,,,,,-.f; '.‘. ,:.,••.12-cora,Alle.tylLill, ,.,•4-'-••• ty ... ,4$4,0"-* . - .-,.'i'. •4 1' . '...' crilivctiv1 ,f- covieqtrYL,-, ..., ** , ,\ '''"!alP ,•; 1TralC --:.tii,TI-‘-;•.j.'ift.:.-k--' • s .,‘,., ,,,), [1•-.1:fr,'11`Reg:rt-n- ience '4 4"- , 't't****'*4-**,.----„'' :4;;:`•'-`.... .•4 I-P,c-• • 'I- • . . 444"-IN'Trali ;-•....r.... t, • ‘ . ,-, S t:- •- --v.,.,-, . - - tv----,,, 1,.., riP.i.e.o.•- ..= -1-.--. ,----- . .%..k,.-, 1,,, •=.6 sitiv1-04.4.- .7- '--,g-• ',• 'rIltleSz.4,. .. ... P • .....* • q-,:•.„-•,' • •* '' rrenc n OP--,0,... r-, „yconcu ,..t,* twctly 7 . ... , . • •Ai"' r,r:' ,',4• giebnk...v,'',..-/* .4$1. .,,,,,,I''' eli.,..,. '14,•,,,, FUn" m,„„....4 , „:// ,,-_,-'40,)\1)1i' .-- . .. 6., • , , 1.2.2— , . A . A . , ._. , ' ilv• 4 ' - ,4-4."`''4., :>,*• ' 11'1 -,7- .... • - -- --- ,!, ';,', ,.•„ - - - , - - .= .. ' '',, ' 'platy., ,,,, ,, ',' •,,I.,,,,, •-‘ , -,,,, ; inel4 .' ' '' -. .i':i!`‘ ' •t.., ' ,.. ,5,,,,',,,,,vn'Vt'• micyc , ,e,e,online .r* 4,010.gY?•*1 '....-A*:/;'" - .,*!..?.16,T,ralls"'-, - iNiettiorkIR, ' 1 liP.1-1.N.It'j114?4.:,,, 4: -..., ---,,,..1.14,!!‘20.!!!6,! 4*E,vallAP,4--.-c'''F'y4'-,!,--':.,.,..k?:".,:.- 4,--- omes istrng ' t- . *,,,`.• loittes'-. i4t.'''.1'1-4.:74*.'4:::•''''' ,-.4,1''.':e"-1,- , ''Distances ,. - .17:.*„:**-"'''1",TEm ' ,,.4':';'''': ' ATKIN VSTEM = ..,..,,--4---- 'i, ,-....''''''= -1 t eye , d ., • . ,1-.--*: ., ,• ,,, 3 i 1', t' , ' ' ' rraik/B- i " , ., ‘..,,,,,-..,e „,„, ,,,,, , ,,, ,.. s --Grade Changes .' < , '1:01;4,1, -P° "'‘,:`'`'' ',;,.- '.'.,1;''g I, 4rt 1 ', .ti,o‘ ‘.' .., ,,.;%.,,,,,,•, ,, A*'2 gg.,1 8`.4,1 ''' %„ .0.,, .*,%.!*:* ''', ,,r,,,,, ' ' 0 Safety ,, , ' ‘,4,..,!•‘-' "` 0 *4 •'-*'i ' ' , •ihM)Yk**,4- 5‘' • U •,FROM,x.I9, :' „:.,„ • 0 ( o 0 • 4,11,1c,...pg5H, ;.;:,,...t,onAtc.,3 113,0,'ides • 0 et ..) .110e,..4.-- ' ' Apt rail ffileft,nk " .I.A.,*'Ai.'''*i***'i..‘•," .N.S.*ial.,4,1,*;.,it.,;,.„,',-..3.• 2 ..,`,.24(1:4.,47. i '..#4:•-•;'4°. 3 .,,.•.,<,,,,.,1,,44.,,..),ft ,,,,,44.,..,t,..4..ti.C.` - .,,:'0.'4): •';,..'....""o•f:,..*P4''"-` r` �Y:- "" e t A e 1Y 4e�' j k h a:° "v..a-"•p k �d ``'; :� a= ,w: °' , fQtherCurient.CitStudies&PTans.V•,,,':-.‘-1,,''''',-,4,4 lan .4utcomesto� .' = /: Y W s f . -. •.-Planning•Iipv`9 »el'ks�# P to ..',`£ -y l ,a fi ti ti '.', „` «. >'; y� . ,F , .; �OWntOWn Wayflnding Study"w r ', y4E.1..` «^>%y ' :;f',i:•Cusli;- , gip.', � 3 6 ,,,, ?I„` ++' '• » t� ` ' ,' r Proposeilpi�liies;ioliey: Hnges ;;<,;;F;° - ,h zComprehensiverWalkway. of ' •'''''‘; ',..:•!,eco�iuriended;cayr�r,�dors,roniestfaci i6es Highlands a.Elementary ScJ�ool Walk Route iia, •,, ,:,-• .,.•',•i' .,•z Syr, 4r• �: .'.:'�• Plar�., ..•;:;":;!'.0,= .1.,,,,t•.,- V �•''' r. rb ^!F'A-Y : Eualnatton•criteraaiprprojeeGselecaon :,� it 1401,1, . € .' . , ,. q Highlands Task Force eArPko ess t?rioittizatioi[of projects'tzails and bicycle' " • ; Designlsignagestandards And cross-sections' =; E .t e ar s� �:.)� ,:.,::,;.;-:,-',......Y:.''.1:,!;••••'.. 'rr 'i S35,1;,...-.<,.i.:-'."k,:-.;•s.}' „,2,,:".•;.,' ..7i'u.i:� .. f • st s aF g S r fit , ,p ''., ,*.,;.,4,...—.,,,k.,„ *«' �--t” s • a w�r,C« n3�, `Y' 3 �°e '� �� 4 .•� " K '"fes • s 5 ¢" " 3i E�ti b f• • ;? • 1' A 's •pry s4.1X1-,: cam' �t 'w : Y. Next Steps=PL�blic Panc�lpation . .. ....::. ---, :n Nan Motored Transportation Committee Meeting#. f $get 6 r� •-:.:.!:..r.:1,,,,;.!-„,,,. y c .; �� "1„1,*. Park Board Briefing#2=Sept 9� r,,�� � '?�, � � �--tj � '��R i �"� ..,,,..1 ci: :,ti Open•House#2 Sept:,12 _+� • t .., 1 .�r� .1,,,.,;,.. 5: i I Mayor Briefing,#3 TBA ,n, , ' ' + g a Committe• e of the Whole Bnefing—'TBA d , �. W� t„,:.. '` ri Open House#3 TBA ' • 6 r • s' &` F I Park Board#3,Presentation andSRecommendation »u •tri TBA:__ � •� • �1 �� i F • }�•� �``'� �j�����?�f �:,Ra Y ko Council Presentation and Adopted” TBA v -4.8. t• ..._.tt �. r .`3�,t`:..,w.a �" _i.1 ...: a ..,,'. ,... . �:' k._ +'.- • .' :� 4 tti Air& . /tea Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Draft Evaluation Criteria Criteria The following criteria have been developed to use as the basis for evaluating routes: the final selection of routes,the design and cross sections of the routes, and ultimately,as a tools for prioritizing the trails for funding and construction. While all these criteria bear significant weight on planning decisions,first and foremost,trails and routes need to provide a safe experience for all user groups. The evaluation criteria are based on community needs,safe and efficient bicycle travel. The criteria are listed in proposed order of priority. Safety: The proposed facility should provide a safe trail experience. Factors affecting safety: • potential for conflict with other trail users and vehicles, especially at crossings • traffic volume, speed, and type:smaller, passenger vehicles vs.larger vehicles like trucks and busses) • cross section or geometry of facility: proximity to vehicular travel lanes, separation from vehicle lanes,width of facility,grade,sight distances, surfacing, etc. • perceived safety:overall sense of comfort with the facility Accommodation/accessibility: The proposed facility should serve the needs of the maximum number of user groups possible;both commuters and recreational users,young and old, pedestrians and cyclists. Some advocate accommodating differing travel modes, user abilities, trip purposes through separate facilities--separating faster cyclists or equestrians from a primary trail meant to accommodate pedestrians and less-skilled or slower.cyclist. Continuity& Directness: The proposed facility should be continuous,clear and easy to follow, proceeding in the most efficient, and direct pathway possible. As human-powered transportation, cyclists tend to favor routes that require the least expenditure of their energy. In addition, navigability and ease of wayfinding, are extremely important to human-powered transportation. Connectivity/Linkage: The proposed facility should link destinations of all levels: neighborhoods,employment centers,schools, parks,shopping, recreation and entertainment facilities,public services,and destinations beyond the city limits. In addition the facility should synchronize with transportation nodes and modes through the City,to facilitate multi-modal connections. Regional Trail Connectivity: The proposed facility should take advantage of the nexus of several regional trails in the area,connecting to and between these systems to create an even larger network. Trail experience: The proposed facility should provide a comfortable and appealing trail experience, and should take advantage of opportunities to follow scenic corridors and connect with scenic resources. In order of most desirable to least desirable,the following cross-sections are recommended: separated path, bicycle lanes, paved shoulders,shared roadway, and shared sidewalk. Factors affecting trail experience: • safety and comfort • perceived safety • trail volumes and types of users I C1. Ren:-n Trails and Bicycle , las'.er P ar 8'13:2007 • noise, air pollution,traffic speeds and volume • scenery and scenic resources Sensitivity: The proposed facility should be designed to respect and avoid harm to wildlife corridors,critical areas,and other sensitive landscapes. Concurrency: The proposed facility should be concurrent with other City, County and regional non-motorized planning efforts. Funding/Construction Opportunities: Identify opportunities to construct the proposed facility as part of other projects. Methodology The criteria are listed in order of priority, pending confirmation. The matrix below illustrates the proposed evaluative methodology. The routes will be evaluated by each criterion, using a simple to use scoring system. This methodology is designed to allow some flexibility and judgment. EVALUATION SYSTEM Negative or Somewhat Strongly Q' Z • "Y insufficient positive positive information — w PROPOSED . LL U U z q 2,' ¢ w E. z :':z ' � cc U. zcu O RANK PROJECT. .FROM . TO IMPROVEMENTS `^ -a w . k-- sn . h u 1 Any street Interection A to Bike lanes, °Y • t'; �•; • G Intersection B both sides • 0 • 2 Any trail Right bank to Multi-use trail n Left bank O • 'I �"'' • O G • tvil• (.E lb Re,) Trails and B€t:ycie Master F•f ;n 8/13/2001 Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan U "4' Comment Summary to Date 312vilgep 7 August 14, 2007 Most frequently heard comments: • Connect the regional trails: Interurban, Green River, Cedar River, Lake Washington Loop Critical connections: Interurban via Fort Dent Park Lake Washington Loop via south/Coulon Park • Establish a safe and convenient east-west route through downtown • Create safe routes to neighborhoods, especially the Highlands • Improve wayfinding signage, especially through downtown • Foster more awareness of bicycle through "Watch for Cyclists" and other signage • Improve and maintain facilities with bikes in mind: detector loops that detect bikes, good roadway maintenance, storm drain covers and railroad crossings that are safe for bikes • Modify critical intersection to increase safety and convenience for bikes General comments: • Provide continuous roadway sweeping and regular maintenance on designated bike routes • Redesign storm drain covers such that they don't conflict with or catch bike tires • Provide bike parking and wayfinding signage downtown • Look for routes that are inexpensive to develop Bike routes/connections/improvements recommended: • safe route to Renton Highlands, Sunset, Harrington, Renton Technical College • Kennydale to Green River Trail • Post office on NE 4th'between Union and Duvall difficult to access by bike or foot • South Renton to Lake Washington Loop/Gene Coulon Park • SW 7th as east-west route through downtown • Williams/Wells as north-south routes through downtown • East-west-route along railroad right of way • 1-5 crossing at S. 129th • 1-405 crossings at Renton Hill, Kennydale (N. 30th/Kennewick Place) • 1-405 improvements should include route from NE 44th St. interchange, parallel to freeway, to May Creek Trail • Houser Way N between 4th and downtown—convert to 2 way • bike route from Hwy 99 into the valley—Renton and Kent • Edmonds as north-south route through Highlands • Duvall to Coal Creek Parkway • SE May Valley Road • Newcastle to May Creek to Windtree subdivision • Honey Creek Trail to May Creek Trail • South 1961h, with new overpass, as east-west route across valley between Kent and Renton • 100th, 116th, and 132nd Avenues SE as north-south routes from Renton to Kent Difficult intersections: key: NB =northbound, SB =southbound, EB =eastbound, WB =westbound • N. Park Drive and Lake Washington Blvd N. • Rainier Ave S, SB turn to Airport Road—difficult left turn • Coal Creek Pkwy & SE May Valley Rod—bridge is a choke point MALL 0D R CKORD Renton Trails and acyc e Master Pian .,`./1 5/20n 7 • SW 7th & Lind —roundabout suggested—NB cars often don't stop at sign • 8th& Garden • Logan &6th—bikes not detected by detector loops • SW 7th &Oakesdale—bikes not detected by detector loops • Airport& Logan—bikes not detected by detector loops • 6th&Williams—WB bikes unable to turn left SB onto Williams • Williams &Grady Way—bikes not detected by detector loops • N. 8th St& House Way N—bikes not detected by detector loops • May Creek bridge—choke point for traffic as road narrows to cross creek • Need a safe place to cross Rainier Avenue Problem areas: • Sight distance up route to Renton Hill is poor • Philip Arnold Park cut-through needs improvement • Puget Drive SE east of Jones PI SE/Rolling Hills Dr—shoulder is overgrown • Houser Way& Park Dr N. • Cedar River Trail extremely noisy along Maple Valley Highway—add noise barrier Signage • "Watch for Cyclists" sign for motorists on critical routes • Wayfinding signage into and out of downtown Renton Opportunities • Consider trail over top of utility duct on SW 7th • Rest stop along Lake Washington Loop at 30th Street Pedestrian/walkway requests: • Need for a safe crossing of Sunset to Hazen High School • Ensure good connections/pathways in and out of The Landing • Create safe pathways around Highland Elementary and along Harrington to the Harrington Square • Don't develop undeveloped rights-of-way in the Highlands area • Add pedestrians scale lighting—esp. In the Highlands, for safety • Provide lighting on a very public(visible)trail system (Landing, McKnight JR High) • May Creek Trail—provide better access to lower May creek trail paralleling 1-405 via overpass/underpass • Provide benches along Lake Washington Blvd Trail (bump-out at 30th St) • Provide additional soft surface trail (adjacent to Cedar River Trail specifically noted) • • MAGI.' 0i: CKORD Rrnton Trails and E3'"yc: 3 :?-Master Pan website: http://rentonwa.gov z' ti`cY O • r ; r JTf\Jl] / :D7y a ..0 .,1 1\ City of Renton - 1055 South Grady Way ANT Renton, WA 98057 May 16, 2007 For more information contact: John D. (Dan) Hasty, Project Manager 425-430-7246 Preeti Shridhar, Communications Director 425-430-6569 CITY OF RENTON INVITES YOU TO AN OPEN HOUSE ON RENTON'S TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN WHAT: Join Renton area bicyclists, walkers and other trail users by participating in a public Open House. This event is a great opportunity for you to review and provide comment on Renton's existing trails system and recognized bike routes, as well as existing policies and goals. Participants will also have the opportunity discuss existing trails or bicycle usage patterns that the city does not currently recognize and to suggest additions or modifications to the city's current policies and goals. WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday,May 30, 6:00—8:00 pm. Highlands Neighborhood Center, 800 Edmonds Ave NE, Renton AND Wednesday, September 12, 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Renton Community Center 1715 Maple Valley Highway, Renton CONTACT: John D. (Dan) Hasty, Civil Engineer, Renton Transportation Systems Division 425-430-7246 or Jhasty a("�,ci.renton.wa.us • C:\DOCUME—l\MNeumann\LOCALS-1\Temp\media advisory bicycle trail open house 5-16-07.doc May 14,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 169 Pursuant to City Code 4-8-110F(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and the submissions by the parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City staff and argument by attorney for the appellants and attorney for the applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Committee hereby found and recommended as follows: appellant's attorney conceded that the applicant had vested to the R-8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council find that the Hearing Examiner did not make any substantial error in fact or law in approving both plat applications. The Committee further recommended that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2007 and beyond. Items noted included: * Everyone is invited to a community forum on emergency preparedness presented by the City of Renton on May 22 at the Renton Community Center. * Two free natural yard care workshops are going to be held at the Renton Senior Activity Center. The first, "The Good, the Bad, and the Bugly" is on May 17, and the second, "Are Noxious Weeds Growing in Your Backyard" is scheduled for May 24. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, noted that the political Citizen Comment: DeMastus- campaign season has begun, and she wished all candidates well. She expressed Political Campaigning her hope that candidates will not take each others campaign signs and destroy them. Citizen Comment: Radford- Dean Radford, Editor of the Renton Reporter, 600 Washington Ave. S., Kent, Official Newspaper 98032, spoke on the consent agenda item concerning designation of The Seattle Times as the City's official newspaper. He requested that the matter be referred to the Finance Committee for further review. Mr. Radford noted the commitment the Renton Reporter's news staff has for covering the City and its residents, saying that the coverage is not matched by any other newspaper. He further noted that the newspaper is looking for office space in Renton, and that the Renton Reporter reaches nearly 30,000 households in Renton. Citizen Comment: McOmber- Howard McOmber, 475 Olympia Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, expressed his hope Highlands Area that the ordinances concerning the Highlands area listed on the council meeting Redevelopment, Trails and agenda move forward without any changes, such as to the conforming uses and Bicycle Master Plan, not having to demolish anything as long as it is within the standards. He also voiced concern regarding the safety of the trails in the Highlands area, saying he is looking forward to providing input en the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Mr. McOmber recommended the elimination of dark, dangerous trail areas, and the establishment of wheel chair-friendly and mobility scooter-friendly trails. Citizen Comment: Doyle- Charles Doyle,411 5th Ave. S., Renton, 98057, introduced himself as the Political Campaigning director of the Highlands Community Association's candidate search committee. Mr. Doyle'indicated that he has talked to a number of people who are interested May 14,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 168 SPECIAL PRESENTATION Parks Director Betlach and Transportation Planning and Programming Community Services: Trails Supervisor Seitz reported on the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, a joint and Bicycle Master Plan effort of the Transportation Systems Division and the Parks Division. Mr. Seitz explained that in 2005; State law was amended to include requirements for local governments to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian planning into each comprehensive plan. He noted that Renton is the hub of three major trails: Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop, and Interurban Trail, and that the Transportation Systems Division was awarded a$100,000 federal grant to create a bicycle route map. Ms. Betlach reviewed the goals of the master plan,which include interconnecting neighborhoods and local destinations, creating a safe and convenient network that provides local and regional connectivity, encouraging healthy lifestyles, and encouraging alternate modes of transportation. Mr. Seitz listed the master plan,objectives, including identifying local and regional destinations in a trail and bicycle network, inventorying and evaluating existing trails and bicycle routes, identifying connections to major destinations, identifying preferred network of routes, identifying safety issues,developing methodology to prioritize improvements, and ensuring accommodation of a wide variety of users and trip purposes. Continuing,Mr. Seitz and Ms. Betlach reviewed the master plan outcomes and Ms. Betlach reviewed the public outreach plan, which includes public open houses, Council briefings, and meetings with the Renton Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee and the Park Board. Ms. Betlach noted that the final presentation to Council and the adoption of the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is proposed for January 2008. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Planning& Development regarding the appeal of the Puget Colony Homes 1 and 2 short plats. Applicant Committee John Skochdopole of Conner Homes submitted two short plat applications for Appeal: Puget Colony Homes Puget Colony Homes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, SHP-06-146, was heard 1 &2 Short Plats, Cook, SHP- before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the 06-146 & SHP-06-147 future construction of single-family homes. Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, SHP- 06-147, was submitted to City of Renton's Department of Planning/Building/Public Works as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on 1/18/2007. Planning/Building/Public-Works Administrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on 1/25/2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Committee heard both matters on 5/10/2007. . The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Pl. in Renton. This area was annexed into the City in December 2005,with R-8 zoning. In December 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to R-4. Prior to the R-4 zoning taking effect, applicant Conner Homes vested their plat application to the R-8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner on 1/9/2007,the issue of a covenant was presented before the Hearing Examiner. City staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and therefore the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. ti £ " qr ,S €53 4 1 I �ywn� d 0 gam •CtS t i ) O D U) 0CD 14*4411 L. c_n ay CIcU 4 E- .> c IV CI r) N IL . ~. , p ,a; 0 co 4. •.... CI cn mn 03 a t.: .j kp ,__. a w a) CD +a (13 > •IC 2 Law u) E +.• , 465 c w 2 V •C sa., 4.1.O � a) 0) (i) cl) ca. 48 .c 4-‘ E 2 E 14•0 2 CMCD rti a) ,ic sic 0 "CS C Ti 0 MI >, C CZ >4 (ci ti) w 2 :wz a) 2 :a 0 Q. -- E ..c a) 15 a, zaki:d its ° co 0 14Pc5 c tit mo c %Fr F.,, utS) O a O Ts .— o M co v L- s O O Cl) I nti2 N c c O co 0 co 22 sa L.. 'O 0 ■_ 0 -• > _ _+ • L •- .0 a) 44-3 0 Zoo' " ..c 'au co c (/) 0 ( 0, ( w :165 4) 4-1 +-' •— -lla Ci C "-I c (I) IF. = 0 Zi I— w cm 0 t/> >' 4) C) L w ,v •- - ♦••+ = 0 l 3 • • • CU 011) ce), a) - - 0., ■I C) CU • • O C VI. CD i .• O C _ C to v •� J - cl, ._ 32 " 2 ci) g (I) c cCC - ■Q co , D. . III � - L ' Ism0 E .... . .... C �i••+ ....> co a) . c >, .... 113. a) 1... .c a; , 0 .0 a) a) ,- •- V/ W 0 LW IMP ' > w E a) E ., 2 44.°5 44"' ,.. .1:2 CA OQ ..■I i v 1 so >'O as z 0 -0 ahe_ ) , 6. to (� .. •— 4..+ Z'i CO th. . .' 0.. as C Q 4� - _ w .,. *a0 v-- a) .c I-- 0 -o v t to O ,u) > 4-• al a) ---. 5 c ct cu cl) 0 1.0 >4,..... cilia CD m 1._ E o. a) a) ....,, 1,_ (13 a) •_. : = p.m 1._ (0) C,...) c wt u) (,) ... as >' CU ......" a) 1:5 .... .., ..• , . O Q as c) aswas .— s a) � 0 '� I- cam F— 0 F— Q as i i ; r ., 1 r Sim '` °`.. r 0 ire W . 13 as �i i .,„,,,... _ 0. .0 cp... ;., , •. Itn "... E L T --i/ O0 .tI.S o y p 1 -. L. MN •liMie -.,---R--s .., • as t%. Cl)� •x•,, - �,`,r - , . '�, ..! .. ...., ., .. . ..„--- - , G) )1► _.. a e%,r' Sri,. ` 1 ,. 'D 0 f �.. ,I'4 L . •4 i ..., 4) .. IIf , • q�,a i !‘,11! ' °j % ,, Ora ". b C }P �R `q x j r i i \V e I 1 ._ 4- . ka:Fir; ... f ^� /��....... a EL .4 1f k . ... , ion fa W r L `r±r i k :add _ .,ter,- 4 11 i 1 Pr--- P YJl P" •• . _. 1 a Y 0 111 ., , ... \ 0 _ Ilk ' ''-:'''-4‘. .:. - CriS .11111 ,IIIIIMII c to 0 m to > c a Imv co •••,.... •-••.; . - cu 7 __I iii. a) a) 4 _ Alpa i = v a) a) - :1 j, is a) - y if � C Min _UI) CO . P it L Q ' .5 : v' r ' --"'"^",0•1 : ., ' __... 4.0s (111:$ 73 O0 , . i t , g ; : {t milla , t L • % r 3. Al 0 Alma N O) C• MINIM c L O III NM L L_ ' 0 . u r ::a �, K , 'b 0 - str � y P a) a F} .x y cor) t , , . 4., ..... . ... .. III NMI O -- { (09 >I% 0) .r4► ° i i ., L yR # (iti II CD ,* k ,r t .(t! SP .. Cr) al V O — t . �.' V a ID 4 ;- f. u.1001" a) caC � ., v •. -wt. iE f1 . I:'',:llif.:,:- r- r + s • G. iii i ., R . 3f" o- 1111.111. CISr 1 ` — 0 '., ' . . - 0 (ID I.I.•• 0 f ii. 0B. UV) MIMI 0 0 .4 V RS i : I, •••• C I \ i' milma 0) E ni ap ft E as 2(Is o tU , c >, o • 0 o0„. - .L . (113 e CD C = C E m c 111 al .— . c' • ft y ft'-'' 5 t L .b� C ' ' >' 4"� 0 N C �.(N3 MC On } f O N.,. . h" __"Y> ,4-.' .;i,, i ' aill N L r • K rCU ` r l' ME Cf " a •um mum 111•1. � i _CI) ale r rM 01111:2 o L cv 'j� ;, Ir Q 4 C13 C G) -0 its t a. ...... as v7 . 0 .I C a NMI 7 ..._ az; ....... /,/ / i,_,L., ■.>• 03 E M<_n (fE r! a �%!� C ...... E . .. .y x . t ..rje• Lam. ._. �' ci) -0 s.. o r>•r , ".i t n fill - ISL....04 1 ,4I,; p �t 1 ... ... yv,, 44.4. p4 "I'r _..- C II NM -~ C.) igl cu co >41 CM 111 NM .0 0 — +.- 7 > x C 0 1 t,. ' ..• ri: 3 f ,ti `•RTi r, h s� ri r a; - ti; lestrot_..,:.."... ' -r I it .-,n ' . i 1 4 rk,..,.. T‘, : i ! : *{p LJ� t �;� i ✓ ✓ ,n °• 1 t .' , O mm• O +110 41) .O C >' v '� V �>'„ 1- *l a _ ,� C 'I— O Sim O as a) IMMO 'I - MMMIV 0 E Q. 0 a) C) N Cl) 0 CD 0 ts) (v a (i) cin42) W (I) 0 th 3 —6 0) cn 0 o 13 o tp. mr„ t'Ci y-- CD CtS 0 E E s�. o O. CD Zi L o > szin wir) > a E g3r.ram • 4:.4,;.:1,,t,':.:71-'''‘,":74i..:0,.r4:0,".,:its.'1.44.%';‘..`4^:spv_.'ft,!;:ft' , r .}3 .;ram r11y1 _ ,,s t R* ±".7t T.y ■111/1 'W 44•er .!'+fit' 4 a , yyC,i. fi :: t ' } & 4j s ' i ,, ,' s a ,f > .t. r'',: ,- ,- '1,.'t '' It i 121o, ..- 4 ..... co .--+ ,,,...: 4,4., ,i . a . 1 .4- jz, H • .4,,t, .„•.,,, ,..,,, t,„; 4'4 . 4Y r^ �. h 'I'• V •' 4 ar CD ` .- fc r 'C �wA r t '" ,' 0 RI = 4 ,.... ...„ , .. . „, ,.. _ .___ .....itsE .2 E ...iii 0 r C yp' v , ,.. . EL.,. il'-‘"" ',0' 4. 0 L. t. s.,. a . , i , rt .- (I) M I W 0 r *V,.^fti^{,^'%•";ism .r' -"me • O V C 4D CC C — Cl)cn 4) � C.) _ - C 4� CU M •- .0 Q CD v CO > c.)' V�0) c) 4 L 0. -0 (..) I aim 0 MO 0 MEN (II) CLO a 2 ,44-# " 8 gs 0 . 0 � V L L .v 1 •a+43) 44- O L ca mial 0 "CI t) 73 as RI cis CI. _ O _ C BCD CL 4) ,CD 0 tQ L.-0 4� C :11111111.1.11M C C) o E as Q 1,... C) •2 c o •O > Ua) CD > L. .� .� • + •• • • • 4-0 ' a) M 0 CL C Ce aR SM f CU W'✓r - h a) E , ,,,., ,--,.... -..... -(:; E ›% . u) o v a) . . .a m (.) CtS 1111.1110 o l C m • 0) •cts oII- 2 a�CU C a)10 E a) Li) o Cl) ', > �. p oC w Sim 11111.81 m Nis Ens 4•0 L. . s.. E (n a X-1.1 1,19 ._ as i a) I I • • Y'�M MT.YfR Q • �#x hs" � • -. N i O 0 C O CIL o O 0 L- .ci o E = inc L CU C Gil) Ocu Cli LP MG) aN a) •IMO I .� . •-0.) fa 0 MC .. c cu (1111) O. r- 'O .0 (o Cl) a C R L i IMMO .- _ ,.1, v Q3 v • •O .— CO _ 'O .O C co O -O O 3 = N . ,= M cu O a O , Li) cz a) co 0 a) a) a) v) a) — LS I-- I- I- I- I- —� • . . . . C^l)+ _. .... , ,, E ......, O O t� Q. L. > 1 O OM a = > ._ as .c >% a.) �- — — 'Zi II 1111=1 MN Rt 13 C 4.) cts ii.. to M .; .. OK , C; 5 a) C 0., a.) O- C E 4...... a.0 c..) -0 m O 4..... E (/) a) ._ (I3 0 ._ O L. U) C v *MN 0. O 1... w C cu • . ,, . ,, •. •.... .he E > > c a) 0 0.. •.... OC Ct a O as • • • 0