Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJurgens RUV 191204.pdfDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYCITY of IL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton0"6% SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1 VARIANCE Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7294 1 www.rentonwa.gov PURPOSE: A means by which citizens may be granted relief from the strict application of the provisions of certain land use regulations. The process is intended to review situations where uniform requirements would unduly burden one property more than other properties in the vicinity. FREE CONSULTATION MEETING: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant should informally discuss the proposed development with the Planning Division. The Planning Division will provide assistance and detailed information on the City's requirements and standards. Applicants may also take this opportunity to request the waiver of the City's typical application submittal requirements, which may not be applicable to the specific proposal. For further information on this meeting, see the instruction sheet entitled "Submittal Requirements: Pre -Application." APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are required to bring in a CD or USB portable (flash/hard) drive (or other device or pathway as approved by your assigned project manager) with one PDF file of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to scheduling an intake meeting. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s) during a pre -application meeting, please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Planning Division staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call 425-430- 7294 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. ADDITIONAL PERMITS: Additional permits from other agencies may be required. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain these other approvals. Information regarding these other requirements may be found at http://apps.oria.wa.gov/opas/. All Plans and Attachments are subject to Electronic File Standards H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev: 07/2019 APPLICATION MATERIALS: 0 1. Pre -Application Meeting Summary: If the application was reviewed at a "pre -application meeting." DOES THIS APPLY? ❑ 2. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form during or after a "pre -application meeting." ❑ 3. Master Application Form: The standardized application form used for the majority of land use permit applications including, but not limited to, the following: CAN THIS FORM BE PROVIDED? a. Owner, applicant, and contact person names, addresses and telephone numbers; b. Notarized signatures of all current property owners; c. Name of the proposed project; d. Project/property address; e. King County Assessor's tax account number; f. Existing and proposed land uses; g. Existing and, if applicable, proposed Comprehensive Plan map designation; h. Existing and, if applicable, proposed zoning designation; i. Site area; j. Estimated project cost; k. Whether or not the project site contains any environmentally sensitive areas; and I. Property legal description. ❑ 4. Fees: The application must be accompanied by the required application fee (see Fee Schedule). Please call 425-430-7294 to verify the exact amount required. Checks should be made out to the City of Renton and cannot be accepted for over the total fee amount. Credit cards may also be used to pay required application fees. Fees are paid at Cashier on the 1st Floor City Hall. ❑ 5• Project Narrative: A clear and concise description and summary of the proposed project, including the following: a. Project name, size and location of site; b. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties; 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 WHAT IS THE COR LOOKING FOR HERE? PER THE USDA SOILS c. Current use of the site and any existing improvements; MAP, THE PROPERTY ISPRIMARILY INDIANOLA d. Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes); LOAMY SAND W/ 5 TO 15 e. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions;_ PERCENT SLOPES- IS THIS ADEQUATE? f. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development (i.e., height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.); Yes g. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.); h. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project; i. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed; j. Number, type and size of trees to be removed; k. Explanation of any land to be dedieated to the City; and CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK For shoreline applications only: CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK Name of adjacent water area or wetlands, ii. Natu f existing shoreline — describe: • Type o eline (i.e., lake, stream, lagoon, marsh, bog, floodplain, floodway); • Type of beach (i.e., accretio , rosion, high bank-low bank); • Type of material (i.e., sand, gravel, mu , ay, rock, riprap); and • The extent and type of any bulkheading, and iii. The number and location of structures and/or residential units (ex and potential) which might have views obstructed as a result of the propose project; and only. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK ❑ 6. Variance Request Justification: Please provide a written statement separately addressing and justifying each of the issues to be considered by the City. The burden of proof as to the appropriateness of the application lies with the applicant. In order to approve a variance request, the Reviewing Official must find ALL the following conditions exist: THIS VARIANCE . The applicant suffers practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship and the variance REQUEST FOR is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, BUILDING WITHIN including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject A CRITICAL AREA BUFFER IS FOR property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject THE WETLAND property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the ONLY AND NOT vicinity and under identical zone classification; THE CREEK, • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare CORRECT? or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which Yes, assuming the 3 new construction is out"pepgdktiLIT6ptes\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 subject property is situated; • The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and • The approval is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. 0 7. Density Worksheet https://edocs.rentonwa.gov/Documents/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=955782&dbid=l&repo= CityofRenton ❑ 8. Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provide a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances of the involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any recorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants), the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. © 9. Neighborhood Detail Map: A map, drawn at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100') or one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') (or other scale approved by the Planning Division Director or designee). The map shall show the location of the subject site relative to the property boundaries of the surrounding parcels within approximately one thousand feet (1,000') or approximately two thousand five hundred feet (2,500') for properties over five (5) acres and identifying the subject site with a darker perimeter line than that of surrounding properties. The map shall also show the property's lot lines, existing land uses, building outlines, City boundaries of the City of Renton (if applicable), north arrow (oriented to the top of the plan sheet), graphic scale used for the map, and City of Renton (not King County) street names for all streets shown. ❑ 10. Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign(s): A notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant's representative attesting that the required public information sign(s) has been installed in accordance with City Code requirements. CAN DETAILS ON INSTALLING THIS SIGN BE PROVIDED? ❑ 11. Site Plan: A single fully dimensioned plan sheet drawn at a scale of one inch equals twenty attached feet (1" = 20') (or other scale approved by the Planning Division Director or designee) clearly indicating the following: a. Name of proposed project; b. Date, scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the plan sheet; c. Drawing of the subject property with all property lines dimensioned and names of adjacent streets; d. Widths of all adjacent streets and alleys; H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 e. The location of all existing public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, etc., along the full property frontage; f. Location and dimensions of existing and proposed structures, parking and loading areas, driveways, existing trees on and abutting the site, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, freestanding signs, easements, refuse and recycling areas, freestanding liquid fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, storage areas, buffer areas, open spaces, and landscaped areas; g. The location and dimensions of natural features such as streams, lakes, marshes and wetlands. Include boundaries of utility, open space, and/or critical area(s) tracts, square footage, and purpose statement of each tract. Clearly delineate the critical area and buffer boundaries within the tract and indicate a dimension for buffer width; h. &-dinary high water mark, existing and ,and name of watef ble; CONFIRM OK O NOT SUBMIT unication facilities, indicate type and locations of existing and new OK plant materials used to screen facility componen s an facility; CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK j. A legend listing the following must be included on one of the site plan sheets: i. Total square footage of the site, ii. Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use, iii. Total square footage of all buildings (footprint of each building), iv. Percentage of lot coverage, v. Square footage of all landscaping (total, parking lot, and wildlife habitat), vi. Allowable and proposed building height, vii. Building setbacks required by Code, viii. Proposed building setbacks, ig. Parking analysis, including: CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK • umber of stalls required, by use; number of stalls provided, by use, • Size f stalls and angles, • Location number of handicap stalls, compact, employee and/or guest parking stalls, • Location and size of c cuts, • Traffic flow within the par loading, and maneuvering areas and ingress and egress, • Location of wheel stops, • Loading space, • Stacking space, • Location and dimensions of bicycle racks, carpool parkin aces, and other facilities designed to accommodate access to the site, • Square footage of interior parking lot landscaping; 5 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 CONFIRM f (K) AND (1) DO NOT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT OK FEW t rint of all proposed buildings showing the location of building entrances, window openings, an cape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay District review packet only); Footprint of all abutting and adjacent buildings s the location of building entrances, window openings, and landscape features (require n Center Design Overlay District review packet only); EoLnonconforming use or structure rebuild approval permits: draw on the scaled plan the exact sizes an existing structures and uses, whether damaged or not; write on the scaled plan the dates these established; on a separate sheet, identify the subject property, abutting lots and buildings and abutting land uses. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT OK Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis (For commercial/industrial prop s only): Please provide a landscape and parking analysis including: • Total square age of the site and the footprints of all buildings • Total square footage o ting and proposed impervious surface area(s) • Square footage (by floor and over tal) of each individual building and/or use • Percentage of lot covered by buildings or str es CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT • Number of parking spaces required by City code OK • Number and dimensions of standard, compact, and ADA accessib�esproVided• Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior ❑ 13. Floor Plans: A basic line drawing plan of the general building layout showing walls, exits, windows, and designated uses indicating the proposed locations of kitchens, baths and floor drains, bedrooms and living areas, with sufficient detail for City staff to determine if an oil/water separator or grease interceptor is required and to determine sizing of side sewer. EXACT LOCATIONS OF WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE TBD AT THIS POINT IN DESIGN. CONFIRM THIS IS OK. That's fine, but footprint cannot change between 0 Zcompanied Retention/Land Clearing (Tree Inventov�i����qgrq��l�aiu�lp��robtrreq val. by a full dimensional plan, drawn by a certified arborist or a licensed CAN THIS landsc architect, based on finished grade, drawn at the same scale as the project site SECTION BE plan with the rthern property line at the top of the sheet, clearly showing the following: ELIMINATED? a. All property boun ies and adjacent streets; NO TREES OR b. Location of all areas propo to be cleared; LANDSCAPING WILL BE c. Species and sizes of vegetation to moved, altered or retained and the boundaries IMPACTED and predominant species of stands of tree onsisting of five (5) or more trees. This DURING requirement applies only to trees six inch (6") ca ' r and larger, fifty four inches (54") CONSTRUCTON. above grade, and the location, size and species of all p cted trees on the site; ALL WORK IS d. ON EXISTING For trees proposed to be retained, a complete description of ea ree's health, GRAVEL condition, and viability; DRIVEWAY e. For trees proposed to be retained, a description of the method(s) used to deter a the Waived if limits of disturbance (i.e., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case-by-case ba ' no trees 6 are to be rem61660.\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 description for individual trees); CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT f. For trees proposed to be preserved within a tree protection tract, any special i structions for maintenance (e.g., trimming, ground clearing, root pruning, monitoring, aft rcare, etc.); g. For tr es not viable for retention, the reason(s) for removal based on poor health, high risk of f 'lure due to structure, defects, unavoidable isolation (i.e., high blow down potential), or unsuitability of species, etc., and for which no reasonable alternative action is po ible (pruning, cabling, etc.); h. A description othe impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove on abutting properties; For development ap lications, a discussion of timing and installation of tree protection measures that must in Jude fencing and be in accordance with the tree protection standards as outlined in MC 4-4-1301-19, Protection Measures During Construction; j. The suggested location and',pecies of supplemental trees to be used when required. The report shall include plant) and maintenance specifications; k. Future building sites and drip lineof any trees which will overhang/overlap a construction line; I. Location and dimensions of rights -of- y, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and easements; n. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an a this shall be indicated on the plan; where construction activities will occur, o. For allowed activities, including allowed exempts ns, modifications, and variances, show all trees proposed to be removed in priority tree re ention areas: slopes twenty five percent (25%) to thirty nine percent (39%), high or v y high landslide hazard areas, and high erosion hazard areas; p. Show trees to be removed in protected critical areas: wet nds, Shorelines of the State, streams and lakes, floodways, floodplain slopes forty percen (40%) or greater, very high landslide hazard areas, and critical habitat if the activity is exe pt or allowed by the critical areas regulations in RMC 4-3-050C3, Exemptions — Critic Areas and Buffers; q. Show all trees to be retained in critical area buffers; and In all other areas of the site, trees to be removed may be indicated ge Nrally with clearing limit lines except for protected trees. The location, size, and spe\areas protected trees on a site shall be shown. The plan shall also differentiateed replacement trees from the protected trees. Replacement trees may be n accordance with RMC 4-4-130H1e, Replacement Requirements, and the replacement trees shall be determined pursuant to any planned replanti accordance with RMC 4-4-1301-11c, Calculating Tree Retention. Waiv if notrW 1 are to be worksheet. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT SINCE NO TREES WILL BE IMPACTED removed. H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 Waived if no tre are to 16. removed. 0 e te 0 .pdf CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT : A report prepared by a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect that correlates with the Tree and identifies size, species, health, and reason for any removal. The report shall identify the limits ofistur a retained trees. CAN THIS SECTION BE ELIMINATED? NO TREES OR LANDSCAPING WILL BE IMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTON. ALL WORK IS ON EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ❑ 17. Wetland Assessment: A wetland assessment includes the following: CONFIRM a. WETLAND STUDY BY ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES b• SATISFIES THIS C. SUMBMITTAL REQUIREMENT (ITEM 17) As long as the study includes character istics a - h, it will be accepted A description of the project and maps at a scale no smaller than one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') showing the entire parcel of land owned by the applicant and the wetland boundary surveyed by a qualified surveyor, and pursuant to RMC 4-3-05oF2, Plans and Studies Required; A description of the vegetative cover of the wetland and adjacent area including identification of the dominant plant and animal species; A site plan for the proposed activity at a scale no smaller than one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') showing the location, width, depth and length of all existing and proposed structures, roads, stormwater management facilities, sewage treatment and installations within the wetland and its buffer; d. The exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site development including the type, extent and method of operations; e. Elevations of the site and adjacent lands within the wetland and its buffer at contour intervals of no greater than five feet (5') or at a contour interval appropriate to the site topography and acceptable to the City; f. Top view and typical cross-section views of the wetland and its buffer to scale; g. The purposes of the project; h. Such other information as may be needed by the City, including but not limited to a study of hazards if present on site, the effect of any protective measures that might be taken to reduce such hazards; and any other information deemed necessary to verify compliance with the provisions of this Section. (Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996; Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005; Ord. 5757, 6-1-2015) Note: Please provide a map and a report if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100 feet of the subject property. The wetland report/ delineation must be prepared by a qualified professional and include the information specified in RMC 4-8- 120D.23. In addition, if any alteration to the wetland or buffer is proposed, a wetland mitigation plan is also required. See RMC 4-8-120D.23 for plan content requirements. Wetland Mitigation Plan -Preliminary: A preliminary wetland mitigation plan shall include the following: a. A site plan demonstrating sufficient area for replacement ratios; b. Proposed planting scheme for created, restored, and enhanced wetlands; H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 c. Written report, formatted to eight and one-half inches (8.5") by eleven inches (11"), shall include: Identifying direct and indirect impacts of the project to the wetland area and wetland functions, environmental goals and objectives, and performance standards, and evaluating alternative methods of developing the property using the following criteria in this order: • Avoiding any disturbances to the wetland or buffer; • Minimizing any wetland or buffer impacts; • Compensating for any wetland or buffer impacts; • Restoring any wetlands or buffer impacted or lost temporarily; • Creating new wetlands and buffers for those lost; and • Enhancing an existing degraded wetland to compensate for lost functions and values, in addition to restoring a wetland or creating a wetland. ii. Evaluating each of the mitigation plan criteria found in RMC 4-3-050L. ii. For projects proposing a reduction in wetland buffer width with enhancement, pr 'ding a detailed analysis of the project's compliance with each of the following criteria. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT SINCE THE PROPOSED BUFFER REDUCTION WILL RESULT IN A BUFFER LESS THAN 75% OF THE STANDARD BUFFER. • Th reduced buffer will function at a higher level than the standard buffer; • An enhance uffer shall never be less than seventy five percent (75%) of the standard wi at its narrowest point; and The wetlands mitigation plan does need to address how the reduced buffer will• function better than existing conditoins, but you don't need to strictly follow the criteria here - this comment applies to evertyhing under submittal item 18. • The buffer area has les an fifteen percent (15%) slopes and no direct or indirect, short-term or to -term, adverse impacts to regulated wetlands, as determined by the ty, will result from a regulated activity; and The proposal shall rely upon a site-specificekaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon Wetlands in ington State, Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science (Ecology PublicationNo. -06-006, March 2005) and Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2: M aging and Protecting Wetlands (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-008, Ap ' 2005), or similar approaches; and The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905. or projects proposing averaging in wetland buffer width with enhancement, providing a detai e of the project's compliance with each of the following criteria: CONFIRM OK TO NOT . There are existing physical improvements in or near d and SUBMIT. NO BUFFER buffer; and AVERAGING IN PROPOSAL 9 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and lues; and CONFIRM OK TO NOT That e total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is SUBMIT. NO BUFFER no less t that contained within the required standard buffer prior to AVERAGING IN PROPOSAL averaging; a ❑ 19 A site-specific evaNation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon Wetlands in Waington State, Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science (Ecology Publicatl No. 05-06-006, March 2005) and Wetlands in Washington State, Volume:Managing and Protecting Wetlands (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-0 April 2005), or similar approaches have been conducted. The propose uffer standard is based on consideration of the best available scien as described in WAC 365-195- 905; and • In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced more than seventy five percent (75%) of the standard buffer. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance pursuant to RM -9-25013; and • An analysis of the effectiveness of the proposed Buffer Enhan ment. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005; Ord. 5757, 6-1-201 Standard Stream or Lake Study: A report shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and CONFIRM include the following information: STREAM a. Site Map: Site map(s) indicating, at a scale no smaller than one inch equals twenty feet STUDY BY (1" = 20') (unless otherwise approved by the Community and Economic Development ALTMANN Administrator): OLIVER i. The entire parcel of land owned by the applicant, including one hundred feet (100') ASSOCIATES of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); SATISFIES THIS ii. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) determined in the field by a qualified SUMBMITTAL consultant pursuant to RMC 4-3-050G7, Streams and Lakes, (the OHWM must also REQUIREMENT be flagged in the field); (ITEM 19) iii. Stream or lake classification, as recorded in the City of Renton's COR Maps, the OK City's online interactive mapping application available through the City's website, for the City of Renton Water Class or RMC 4-3-090 (if unclassified, see "Supplemental Stream or Lake Study" below); iv. Topography of the site and abutting lands in relation to the stream(s) and its/their buffer(s) at contour intervals of two feet (2') where slopes are less than ten percent (10%), and of five feet (5') where slopes are ten percent (10%) or greater; v. One hundred (100) year floodplain and floodway boundaries, including one hundred feet (100') of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); vi. Site drainage patterns, using arrows to indicate the direction of major drainage 10 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 flow; vii. Top view and typical cross-section views of the stream or lake bed, banks, and buffers to scale; viii. The vegetative cover of the entire site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, and/or abutting wetland areas, extending one hundred feet (100') upstream and downstream from the property line. Include position, species, and size of all trees of at least six inch (6") caliper and larger, fifty four inches (54") above grade, and the location, size and species of all protected trees on the site that are within one hundred feet (100') of the OHWM, and the location of measures to protect trees on and abutting the site; ix. The location, width, depth, and length of all existing and proposed structures, roads, stormwater management facilities, wastewater treatment and installations in relation to the stream/lake and its/their buffer(s); and x. Location of site access, ingress and egress. CONFIRM b. Grading Plan: A grading plan prepared in accordance with RMC 4-8-120D7, and showing STREAM contour intervals of two feet (2') where slopes are less than ten percent (10%), and of STUDY BY five feet (5') where slopes are ten percent (10%) or greater. ALTMAN N OLIVER c. Stream or Lake Assessment Narrative: A narrative report, formatted to eight and one ASSOCIATES half inches (8.5") by eleven inches (11"), shall be prepared to accompany the site plan SATISFIES and describes: THIS i. The stream or lake classification as recorded in the City of Renton's COR Maps, the SUMBMITTAL REQUIREMENT City's online interactive mapping application available through the City's website, (ITEM R for the City of Renton Water Class or RMC 4-3-090; ii. The vegetative cover of the site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, wetland areas, and flood hazard areas extending one hundred feet (100') upstream and downstream from the property line, including the impacts of the proposal on the identified vegetation; • The ecological functions currently provided by the stream/lake and existing riparian area and the impacts of the proposal on the identified ecological functions; Observed or reported fish and wildlife that make use of the area including, but not limited to, salmonids, mammals, and bird nesting, breeding, and feeding/foraging areas, including the impacts of the proposal on the identified fish and wildlife; • Measures to protect trees, as defined in RMC 4-11-200, and vegetation; and For shorelines regulated under RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Regulations, the study shall demonstrate if the proposal meets the criteria of no net loss of ecological functions as described in RMC 4-3-090D2. If the proposal requires mitigation for substantial impacts to the existing vegetation buffer in order to demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, a supplemental stream or lake study is required. 11 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 Note: Please provide a report containing the information specified in RMC Section 4-8- 120D.19. In addition, if the project involves an unclassified stream, a supplemental stream or lake study is also required. If any alteration to a water -body or buffer is proposed a supplemental stream or lake study and mitigation plan are also required. © 20. od Hazard Data: Flood hazard data includes: CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT a. Plans ' uplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations o e area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage ilities, and the location of the foregoing; b. Elevation in relation to mea a level of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures; c. Elevation in relation to mean sea level to wh any structure has been floodproofed; d. Certification by a registered professional engineer oritect that the floodproofing methods criteria in RMC 4-3-05013c; and for any nonresiden ' structure meet the floodproofing; and e. Description of the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocate a result of proposed development. © 2 %flolain ical Assessment/Critical Areas Study: All development projects located in a and projects with the potential to impact fish (Chinook salmon, bull trout, steel he trout), unexpected, new, rare or other endangered species habitat (bald eagles) CONFIRM OK TO NOT shall provide biological assessment/critical area study. The purpose of this assessment is SUBMIT. NO to determine wh er a proposed action is likely to: (1) adversely affect listed or de -listed FISH BEARING species or designated itical habitat; (2) jeopardize the continued existence of species that STREAM ON are proposed for listing, or expected, new or rare species; or (3) adversely modify PROJECT SITE. NO LAND proposed critical habitat. A bio ical assessment/critical area study is a written study that IMPACT OTHER evaluates the proposal, all probable ' pacts and risks related to the critical area, and THAN GRAVEL recommends appropriate mitigation mea res to adequately protect the functions and AREAS. values of the critical area, and preserve anadr ous fish and their habitat. The assessment/study shall be prepared by a perso ith experience and training in the scientific discipline appropriate for the relevant critical ar'e@ in accordance with WAC 365- 195-095(4). A qualified professional must have obtained a B.%rB.A. or equivalent degree in biology, engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geology, biological assessment, or related field, and have at least five (5) years of related vmrk experience. a. A qualified professional for wetlands must be a professional wetland scie ist with at least two (2) years of full-time work experience as a wetlands professional, i uding delineating wetlands using the federal manuals and supplements, preparing wet ds reports, conducting function assessments, and developing and implementing mitiga ' n 12 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 plans. b.\�Iatecl qualified professional for Habitat conservation must have a degree in biology or a degree and professional experience related to the subject species. c. A qalified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional engineer or ge )Io ist, licensed in the state of Washington. d. A qualifi professional for Wellhead Protection Areas means a hydrogeologist, geologist, 0 gineer, or other scientist with experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. The assessment/stu y shall use scientifically valid methods and studies in the analysis of critical area data and Id reconnaissance and reference the source of the material used. Best available science is Nat scientific information applicable to the critical area prepared CONFIRM OK by local state or federal nat raI agencies or a qualified scientific professional that is TO NOT SUBMIT. NO consistent with the criteria es blished in WAC 395-195-900 through 365-195-925. FISH BEARING The assessment/study shall cont\atnimum, the following information, as applicable: STREAM ON PROJECT SITE. a. The name and contact informe applicant; NO LAND b. The dates, names, and qualifthe persons preparing the assessment/study and IMPACT OTHER documentation of any fieldwmed on the site; THAN GRAVEL AREAS. c. A description of the proposal and identiNation of the permits requested; d. A site plan showing: i. Identified critical areas, buffers and the\�levelopment proposal with dimensions; ii. Topography at two -foot (T) intervals; \ iii. Limits of any areas to be cleared/impacted; iv. A description of the proposed stormwater management plan for the development and consideration of impacts to drat age alterations, e. Accurate identification, location, and characterization of crit' al areas, water bodies, and buffers adjacent to the proposed project area or potentially iacted by the proposed project; f. A statement specifying the accuracy of the assessment/study, ass u ptions used in the assessment/study, and explaining how best available science has bee incorporated; g. Determination of the degree of hazard and risk from the proposal bot\Endangere d on surrounding properties; h. An assessment of the probable cumulative impacts to the critical area and other properties resulting from the proposal; i. An evaluation of the project's compliance with sections 7 and 9 of the Species Act; j. A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing to avoid, 13 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. i .. ize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; k. Plans for adequate i i ' n to offset any impacts and an explanation of how best management practices will be use ' ize impacts to critical area; and I. Recommendations for maintenance, short-term and long- onitoring, contingency plans and security requirements. © 2 Habitat Data Report: Habitat data reports include: Site Plan: The site plan shall indicate: CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. i. The vegetative cover types reflecting the general boundaries of the different \ plant communities on the site; ii. a exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site de10 Iopment including the type, extent and method of operations; iii. Top vie and typical cross-section views of critical habitat/wildlife habitat to scale; iv. The results of arches of the State Department of Fish and Wildlife's Natural Heritage and Non Game Data System databases; v. The results of search of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Spe ' s database. b. Narrative Report: A narrative reports all be prepared to accompany the site plan which describes: i. The layers, diversity and variety of bitat found on the site; ii. The location of any migration or move\ridors; iii. The species typically associated with tes, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that miged to be found; iv. Identification of any areas that have bs disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; v. A summary of existing habitat functions, utilizi a habitat evaluation procedure or methodology y the City; vi. A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and prop sed habitat management program. Potential impacts may include but are not li ted to clearing of vegetation, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, expected decr se in species diversity or quantity, changes in water quality, increases in human intrusion, and impacts on wetlands or water resources. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-200 ©73—Geotechnical Report: A study prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices and stampe I en ineer licensed in the State of Washington which includes soils and slope stability analysis, boring an a recommendations on slope setbacks, foundation design, retaining wall design, material selection, and a o CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. 14 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. rtinent elements. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the repor all be reviewed and approved by a geologist. Further recommendations, additions or exception the original report based on the plans, site conditions, or other supporting data shall be Signe d sealed by the geotechnical engineer. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews the plans an ecifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report, the new en er shall, in a letter to the City accompanying the plans and specifications, express his or her a ment or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report state that the plans and specifications conform to his or her recommendations. If the site c ains a geologic hazard regulated by the critical areas regulations, the preparation and content uirements of RMC 4-8-120D, Table 18 shall also apply. If the site is within a channel migration e, within shoreline jurisdiction, the geotechnical report shall also include a geomorphic as I >Nwert by a Washington State licensed geologist with engineering geology or hydrogeology ecialty license plus experience in conducting fluvial geomorphic assessments. © 24 -Latter of Understanding Geologic Risk: The applicant, or the owner of the site, shall submit a letter tote , ' the plans and specifications, stating that he or she understands and accepts the risk of developing in le area and that he or she will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prosp rchasers of structures or portions of structures on the site, of the unstable potential of the area. 35, 3-27- 2000 CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. ❑ 25. Utilities Plan, Generalized: A plan drawn on twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22" x 34") plan sheets using a graphic scale of one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20') (or other scale or size approved by the Planning Division's Development Engineering Manager or designee) clearly showing all existing (to remain) and proposed public or private improvements to be dedicated or sold to the public including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, refuse areas, signage, freestanding lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, etc., along the full property frontage. The finished floor elevations for each floor of proposed and existing (to remain) structures shall be shown. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000) Waived®ut Architectural Elevations: Please provide for each building and each building face (N, S, E, & footprint must 4" x 36" fully -dimensioned architectural elevation plan drawn at a scale of 1/4" = 1' be or 1/8" = r other size or scale approved by the Planning Division). The plans must clearly maintained. indicate the infor on required by the "Permits" section of the currently adopted International Building Co BC) and RCW 19.27 (State Building Code Act, Statewide amendments), including, but no ted to the following: a. Identify building elevations by street na when applicable) and orientation i.e. Burnett Ave. (west) elevation; b. Existing and proposed ground elevations; c. Existing average grade level underneath proposed structure; d. Height of existing and proposed structures showing finished roof top e tions based upon site elevations for proposed structures and any existing/abutting structu e. Building materials and colors including roof, walls, any wireless communication facil CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. PLANS ARE R!RELIMINARY AND DO NOT INCLUDE MUCH DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO BE DEVELOPED AFTER LAND USE (VARIANCE) IS APPROVED. H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. and enclosures, f. Fence in wall materials, colors, and architectural design; g. Architectural design o Ii ht-ng fixtures; h. Screening detail showing heights, elev nd building materials of proposed screening and/or proposed landscaping for refuse/rec 6-aleas; and i. Cross section of roof showing location and height of roof -top equipme de air conditioners, compressors, etc.) and proposed screening. © 27. Plan: Please provide a plan drawn to scale and stamped by a Washington State licensed professional engineer a ere uirements of RMC 4-6-030 and the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual, as adopted an amen Waived if City of Renton. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5526,2-1-2010) CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. no grading propos8. Grading Plan: A twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22" x 34") plan drawn by a State of CONFIRM OK Washington licensed civil engineer at a scale of one inch to forty feet (1" to 40') (horizontal TO NOT f tt)and one inch to ten feet (1" to 10') (vertical feet) (or other size plan sheet or scale SUBMIT. appr ed by the Planning Division Development Engineering Manager or designer) clearly indicati the following: a. Graphic ale and north arrow; b. Dimensions o all property lines, easements, and abutting streets; c. Location and dim sion of all on-site structures and the location of any structures within fifteen feet (1 ' of the subject property or which may be affected by the proposed work; d. Accurate existing and propo d contour lines drawn at five foot (5'), or less, intervals showing existing ground and de ils of terrain and area drainage to include surrounding off-site contours within one hundr feet (100') of the site; e. Location of natural drainage systems, in uding perennial and intermittent streams, the presence of bordering vegetation, and floo lains; f. Setback areas and any areas not to be disturbeincluding the location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall ve the approximate drip line shown. The method of tree protection during grading d construction shall be shown. If grade changes in the vicinity of the protected trees are ecessary, the method of reconciling the drip line with the finished elevation shall be 1 luded (see RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations); g. Finished contours drawn at five foot (5') intervals as a result of grad) ; h. Proposed drainage channels and related construction with associated un erground storm lines sized and connections shown; and i. General notes addressing the following (may be listed on the cover sheet): i. Area in square feet of the entire property. ii. Area of work in square feet. 16 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. th the number of tons and cubic yards of soil to be added, removed, or relocate . iv. Type and location of fill origin, tinationof any soil to be removed from site. x. Finished floor elevation(s) of all structures, existing and proposed: ❑ 29. Photographs of the Property: Photographs may be submitted with the application as exhibits. ® , site, and landscaping in three (3) dimensional form. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. 0 31. Covenants, Existing: The recorded limitation on property which may be set forth in the property deed and/or identified in a title report. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. ©Existing: A recorded document by the property owner granting one or more privileges to use the owners an b the public, a corporation or another person or entity. Easements may be referenced by property ee an in the property title report. CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. 0 Hazardous Materials Management Statement: A statement which includes: CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. a. A descri of refueling of construction vehicles that will occur on the site and an inventory of hazar o terials expected to be temporarily stored, dispensed, used, or handled on the site. b. A description of how the requirements in RMC 4-4-0300,—Corrstatctfion Activity Standards —Zones 1 and 2, will be met by the applicant. (Ord. 4851, 8-7- • md. Ord. 4992, 12-9-2002) ❑ 34. Parking, Lot Coverage, Landscaping Analysis: A listing of the following information (may also be included on the first sheet of the site plan): a. Total square footage of the site; b. Total square footage of existing area(s) of impervious surfacing; c. Total square footage of existing natural/undeveloped area; d. Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use; e. Total square footage of the footprints of all buildings; f. Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures; 17 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 g. Total pavement square footage, both existing pavement to remain plus new pavement proposed to be installed; h. Square footage of any on-site wetlands; to include the total number of parking spaces required and provided, number of compact and "ADA acces 10 ed and parking space dimensions; CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. OK �SGware foGtag ^f lands -aping fnr each_area, for interior narking lot landscaping and total; CONFIRM OK TO NOT SUBMIT. k. Allowable and proposed building height; Feel free to use,. Building setbacks required by Code; and the data we have in COR m. Proposed building setbacks. (Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996) maps for this one- n,e- V for a II�-II Topography Map: A map showing the existing land contours using vertical intervals of not professional more than five feet (5'). For any existing buildings the map shall show the finished floor topo survey elevations of each floor of the building. All Plans and Attachments are subject to Electronic File Standards REVIEW PROCESS: Once a complete land use application package has been accepted for initial review, the Planning Division will post one notice of the pending application at or near the subject site and mail notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. The proposal will be routed to other City departments and other jurisdictions or agencies that may have an interest in the application. The reviewers have two (2) weeks to return their comments to the Planning Division. Within approximately two weeks, the Planning Division will prepare a report regarding the proposal's compliance with applicable codes and the City's review criteria. The review process that follows varies depending on the type of application request. Administrative Variances: A public hearing is not required. The Planning Division reviews the proposal and any staff or public comments prior to making a decision. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposal will be provided to all persons listed on the Master Application and all parties of record. Hearing Examiner Variances: A public hearing is required. After review of the proposal and any staff or public comments, the Planning Division staff will forward a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner prior to the hearing. This report will be mailed to all persons listed on the Master Application and all parties of record. Notice of the public hearing will be published in the Renton Reporter at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Applicants are strongly encouraged to attend the public hearing for their proposal. City staff will first make a presentation to the 18 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 Hearing Examiner about the proposal. Then the applicant and any citizens in support of the proposal will give testimony. When giving testimony, names and addresses must be stated for the record. Following this, individuals with neutral or opposing comments will give their testimony to the Hearing Examiner. City staff or the applicant will address additional questions raised throughout the hearing. The Hearing Examiner will review the proposed application and issue a final decision within 14 days of the hearing unless, at the time of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner indicates additional time will be required for issuance of the decision. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposal will be mailed to all persons listed on the Master Application and all parties of record. APPEAL AND RECONSIDERATION PROCESS FOR DECISIONS: Any person, including the applicant, aggrieved by the granting or denial of an application, may make a written application for reconsideration to the Reviewing Official within 14 calendar days of the date of the decision. After review of the request, the Reviewing Official may take whatever action is deemed proper. The Reviewing Official's written decision on the reconsideration request will be mailed to all parties of record within 10 days from the date the request was filed. If any party is still not satisfied after a reconsideration decision has been issued, an appeal may be submitted within fourteen (14) days to the City Clerk's Office. An appeal may be filed without first requesting reconsideration by the Reviewing Official; however, it must be filed within 14 days of the date when the original decision was issued. See RMC 4-8-110 for further information on the appeal process and time frames. BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS: In the City of Renton, a Building Permit must be obtained to build buildings and structures. A Construction Permit must be obtained to install utility lines, transportation improvements and undertake work in City right-of-ways. Building and Construction Permits are separate permits. Applicants may not apply for building and construction permits concurrently with their request for a land use application. If no appeals or reconsideration requests are filed within 14 days of the effective date of the decision to approve the application, the applicant may obtain building and construction permits. A construction permit for the installation of on-site and off-site utilities will be issued upon the review and approval of civil engineering drawings by Development Engineering and receipt of all applicable development and permit fees. A building permit will be issued upon the Building Section's approval of building plans and receipt of all applicable fees. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSIONS: Once an application has been approved, the applicant has two (2) years to comply with all conditions of approval, apply for any necessary permits, and/or commence construction or otherwise implement effectively the variance granted before the approval becomes null and void. The approval body that approved the original application may grant a single one (1) year extension if the applicant requests an extension prior to the expiration, specifying the reasons for the request. The approval body may require a public hearing for such extension. 19 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Variance.doc Rev:10/2019 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY L;R AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor I Renton, WA 98057 1425-430-7200 www.rentonwa.aov LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: STEPHAN JURGENS ADDRESS: 2301 JONES AVE NE CITY: RENTON TE: 098056 ZIP: PHONE NUMBER: (206) 661-1761 EMAIL ADDRESS*:SJURGENS22t7a GMAIL.COM ❑ I prefer to receive all correspondence via US Mail. APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS*: ❑ I prefer to receive all correspondence via US Mail. CONTACT PERSON NAME: STEPHAN JURGENS COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: 2301 JONES AVE NE CITY. RENTON STATE: �WA ZIP: 98056 PHONE NUMBER (206) 661-1761 EMAIL ADDRESS*:SJURGENS22@GMAIL.COM ❑ I prefer to receive all correspondence via US Mail. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: JURGENS RESIDENCE ADDITION PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 2301 JONES AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 334450-0210 EXISTING LAND USE(S): SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED LAND USE(S): N/A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) N/A EXISTING ZONING: R-4 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A SITE AREA (in square feet): 21,190 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 PROJECT VALUE: $230,000 *By completing the email address field the owner/applicant/contact person is opting to receive all formal notifications and project documents in digital format via email unless otherwise requested. PROJECT INFORMATION (CONTINUED) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 3,406 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):1 ,924 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE W THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 05 TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 05 _,W.M. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) STEPHAN JURGENS , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) ]the current owner of the property involved in this application or ❑ the authorized representative to act for a corporatfon (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _ �r+l! 4p,� signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act fo a uses and p ru pose mentioned in the instrument. 1/1 I2 02 a L --u Dated Notary Public in aq r the State of as ngton ARMAAN JAZAYERI Notary Pubiic State of Washington My Appointment Expires Nov W, 2020 Notary (Print): My appointment expires: rj Jurgens Residence Addition Project Narrative a. Jurgens Residence Addition, 3,406 SF addition (180 SF demolition) located at 2301 Jones Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056. b. Zoning designation of the site and all adjacent properties is R-4. c. Current use of the site is Single Family with a 1,824 SF existing residence and 100 SF shed. d. The site contains some areas of steep slope, the Kennydale Creek flows through the far eastern side of the site, the entire site is within the buffer to a Category 2 wetland located to the North of the property. e. The site contains primarily Indianola Loamy Sand with 5 to 15 percent slopes. f. The proposed development will not change the current use of the site as Single Family; the scope of the proposed development is to remove the north portion of the gravel driveway along the northern property line and replace with grass, remove the 180 SF porch on the north side of the existing single family residence and construct a 3,406 SF 2 -story addition with garage on the 11t floor and additional living space on the 2nd floor (no additional bedrooms), lot coverage by structures will be 2,715 (12.8% of lot). g. No off-site improvements are proposed. h. The total estimated construction cost is $230,000; fair market value of the proposed project is estimated at $350,000. i. All soil excavated for the proposed slab on grade will remain on site as backfill on the west side of the proposed addition (at the existing stone retaining wall), estimated at 56 CY. j. No trees are to be removed with the proposed development. k. Waived. I. Waived. m. Waived. Jurgens Residence Addition Variance Request Justification Due to the size and shape of the 115' building setback buffer of the Category II wetland to the north of the subject property, the entire property at 2301 Jones Ave NE lies within this buffer and does not allow any buildable area under the current City of Renton code. In comparison to neighboring properties also in the R-4 zoning class, the subject property at 2301 Jones Ave NE is deprived of reasonable use in that the majority of comparable properties are allowed greater square footages of building coverage and impervious surfaces. This greater square footage of land use enjoyed by others allows for things such as a larger home, garage and uniform building density throughout the local R-4 zoned area. Under strict application of the current City of Renton code, the subject is only allowed to maintain its current legal non -conforming status with a structure footprint of 1,192 SF (1,092 SF house, 100 SF shed), which equates to a structure coverage percentage of only 5% (35% is allowed per the COR in the R-4 zoning district). Per the Wetland Study Report provided by Altmann Oliver Associates dated 07/08/2019, the granting of the variance (proposed building referenced in the study report) would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in that the proposed project would not create any additional impacts to the nearby wetland than the current development on the subject property. Also, no increase in pollution generating surfaces would be created associated with the project and there would be no hydrologic impacts to the wetland. The project also does not remove any vegetation since it is proposed to build upon an already developed impervious gravel parking area. Furthermore, the granting of the variance would result in removal of the gravel driveway along the north side of the subject property (south edge of wetland) and replacing with grass thus improving the current degraded buffer. This 2,250 SF (11% of lot) buffer restoration which is a part of the proposed project would be an improvement to the public welfare, property and vicinity in which the subject property is located. Approval of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and R-4 zoning district. The R-4 zoning district allows a maximum building coverage of 35% and a maximum impervious surface area of 50%. The proposed project would result in a building coverage of 12.8% and 26.4% coverage by impervious surfaces. For comparison, the minimum lot size in the R-4 zoning class allowed is 9,000 SF and the respective allowable building coverage area per the City of Renton code would be 3,150 SF. The proposed project on the subject property would result in 2,715 SF of the 21,190 SF in the lot covered by structures. Approval of the variance would result in privilege well under the maximum building coverage and impervious surface area percentages allowed by code and even under the maximum building coverage (in square feet) allowed for the smallest allowable R-4 zoned lot, almost a third of the size of the subject property. Approval of the variance is the minimum required to accomplish the desired use of the land in that the only variance from the code is to allow building within a wetland buffer (reduce the buffer width beyond the amount allowed by code). No other variances from the current City of Renton code are proposed. Instrument Number: 20180629002119 Document:WD Rec: 5100.00 Page -1 of 2 Excise Docs: 2939641 Selling Price: 5567,800.00 Tax Amount: 810,111.84 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM Electronically Recorded King County, WA AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Stephan Jurgens 2301 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Filed for Record at Request of: space above this ane forRerorders use only First American Title Insurance Company STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED File No: 4244-3060623 (CY) Date: June 14, 2018 Grantor(s): Kin Shing Au Yeung and Ying-Chiao Chen Grantee(s): Stephan Jurgens Abbreviated Legal: PTN LOT 330, C. D. HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN DIV. NO. 5, VOL. 11, P. 83, KING COUNTY Additional Legal on page:r, FIRST AMERICAN Assessor's Tax Parcel No(s): 334450021004 THE GRANTOR(S) Kin Shing Au Yeung and Ying- Chiao Chen, a married couple for and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration, in hand paid, conveys, and warrants to Stephan Jurgens, a single person, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: THE NORTH 107 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF LOT 330, C. D. HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 7 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF Subject To: This conveyance is subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. Page 1 of 2 LPB 10-05 Instrument Number: 20180629002119 Document:WD Rec: 5100.00 Page -2 of 2 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM King County, WA APN:334450021004 f` Kin Shing Au Yeung Ying-Chico Chen Statutory Warranty Deed File No.: 4244-3060623 (CY) - continued STATE OF Washington ) )-ss COUNTY OF King ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Kin Shing Au Yeung and Ying-Chiao Chen, is/are the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. "I Dated:% Notary)Public in. and"far�the State of Washington Residing at: ' E =I J 7EXPIRES My appointment expires: 1;7e NOTARY Y � STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION Page 2 of 2 LPB 10-05 r'r t Am r ican Eagle Policy Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance For a One -To -Four Family Residence ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 5020500-3060623 OWNER'S INFORMATION SHEET Your Title Insurance Policy is a legal contract between You and Us. It applies only to a one -to -four family residence and only if each insured named in Schedule A is a Natural Person. If the Land described in Schedule A of the Policy is not an improved residential lot on which there is located a one -to -four family residence, or if each insured named in Schedule A is not a Natural Person, contact Us immediately. The Policy insures You against actual loss resulting from certain Covered Risks. These Covered Risks are listed beginning on page 2 of the Policy. The Policy is limited by: • Provisions of Schedule A • Exceptions in Schedule B • Our Duty To Defend Against Legal Actions On Page 3 • Exclusions on page 4 • Conditions on pages 4, 5 and 6. You should keep the Policy even if You transfer Your Title to the Land. It may protect against claims made against You by someone else after You transfer Your Title. IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A CLAIM, SEE SECTION 3 UNDER CONDITIONS ON PAGE 4. The premium for this Policy is paid once. No additional premium is owed for the Policy. This sheet is not Your insurance Policy. It is only a brief outline of some of the important Policy features. The Policy explains in detail Your rights and obligations and Our rights and obligations. Since the Policy --and not this sheet --is the legal document, YOU SHOULD READ THE POLICY VERY CAREFULLY. If You have any questions about Your Policy, contact: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 First American Way Santa Ana, California 92707 Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance for a One -to -Four Family Residence TABLE OF CONTENTS Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 1 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) Pace Page OWNER'S COVERAGE STATEMENT 2 CONDITIONS COVERED RISKS 2 & 3 1. Definitions 4 OUR DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST LEGAL ACTIONS 3 2. Continuation of Coverage 4 SCHEDULE A Insert 3. How to Make a Claim 4 & 5 Policy Number, Premium, Date and Amount 4. Our Choices When We Learn of a Claim 5 Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability 5. Handling a Claim or Legal Action 5 Street Address of the Land 6. Limitation of Our Liability 5 & 6 1. Name of Insured 7. Transfer of Your Rights to Us 6 2. Interest in Land Covered 8. This Policy is the Entire Contract 6 3. Description of the Land 9. Increased Policy Amount 6 SCHEDULE B - EXCEPTIONS Insert 10. Severability 6 EXCLUSIONS 4 11. Arbitration 6 12. Choice of Law 6 Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 1 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) First Am ri an Eagle Policy Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance For a One -To -Four Family Residence ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 3060623 As soon as You Know of anything that might be covered by this Policy, You must notify Us promptly in writing at the address shown in Section 3 of the Conditions. OWNER'S COVERAGE STATEMENT This Policy insures You against actual loss, including any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses provided under this Policy. The loss must result from one or more of the Covered Risks set forth below. This Policy covers only Land that is an improved residential lot on which there is located a one -to -four family residence and only when each insured named in Schedule A is a Natural Person. Your insurance is effective on the Policy Date. This Policy covers Your actual loss from any risk described under Covered Risks if the event creating the risk exists on the Policy Date or, to the extent expressly stated in Covered Risks, after the Policy Date. Your insurance is limited by all of the following: • The Policy Amount For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A The Exceptions in Schedule B • Our Duty To Defend Against Legal Actions The Exclusions on page 4 • The Conditions on pages 4, 5 and 6 COVERED RISKS The Covered Risks are: 1. Someone else owns an interest in Your Title. 2. Someone else has rights affecting Your Title because of leases, contracts, or options. 3. Someone else claims to have rights affecting Your Title because of forgery or impersonation. 4. Someone else has an Easement on the Land. 5. Someone else has a right to limit Your use of the Land. 6. Your Title is defective. Some of these defects are: a. Someone else's failure to have authorized a transfer or conveyance of your Title. b. Someone else's failure to create a valid document by electronic means. c. A document upon which Your Title is based is invalid because it was not properly signed, sealed, acknowledged, delivered or recorded. d. A document upon which Your Title is based was signed using a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney. e. A document upon which Your Title is based was not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records. f. A defective judicial or administrative proceeding. 7. Any of Covered Risks 1 through 6 occurring after the Policy Date. 8. Someone else has a lien on Your Title, including a: a. lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on Your Title by a governmental authority that are due or payable, but unpaid; b. Mortgage; c. judgment, state or federal tax lien; d. charge by a homeowner's or condominium association; or e. lien, occurring before or after the Policy Date, for labor and material furnished before the Policy Date. 9. Someone else has an encumbrance on Your Title. 10. Someone else claims to have rights affecting Your Title because of fraud, duress, incompetency or incapacity. 11. You do not have actual vehicular and pedestrian access to and from the Land, based upon a legal right. 12. You are forced to correct or remove an existing violation of any covenant, condition or restriction affecting the Land, even if the covenant, condition or restriction is excepted in Schedule B. However, You are not covered for any violation that relates to: a. any obligation to perform maintenance or repair on the Land; or b. environmental protection of any kind, including hazardous or toxic conditions or substances unless there is a notice recorded in the Public Records, describing any part of the Land, claiming a violation exists. Our liability for this Covered Risk is limited to the extent of the violation stated in that notice. Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 2 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) COVERED RISKS (Continued) 13. Your Title is lost or taken because of a violation of any covenant, condition or restriction, which occurred before You acquired Your Title, even if the covenant, condition or restriction is excepted in Schedule B. 14. The violation or enforcement of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; or f. environmental protection, if there is a notice recorded in the Public Records, describing any part of the Land, claiming a violation exists or declaring the intention to enforce the law or regulation. Our liability for this Covered Risk is limited to the extent of the violation or enforcement stated in that notice. 15. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 14 if there is a notice recorded in the Public Records, describing any part of the Land, of the enforcement action or intention to bring an enforcement action. Our liability for this Covered Risk is limited to the extent of the enforcement action stated in that notice. 16. Because of an existing violation of a subdivision law or regulation affecting the Land: a. You are unable to obtain a building permit; b. You are required to correct or remove the violation; or c. someone else has a legal right to, and does, refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make a Mortgage loan on it. The amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. 17. You lose Your Title to any part of the Land because of the right to take the Land by condemning it, if: a. there is a notice of the exercise of the right recorded in the Public Records and the notice describes any part of the Land; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 18. You are forced to remove or remedy Your existing structures, or any part of them - other than boundary walls or fences - because any portion was built without obtaining a building permit from the proper government office. The amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. 19. You are forced to remove or remedy Your existing structures, or any part of them, because they violate an existing zoning law or zoning regulation. If You are required to remedy any portion of Your existing structures, the amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. 20. You cannot use the Land because use as a single-family residence violates an existing zoning law or zoning regulation. 21. You are forced to remove Your existing structures because they encroach onto Your neighbor's land. If the encroaching structures are boundary walls or fences, the amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. 22. Someone else has a legal right to, and does, refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make a Mortgage loan on it because Your neighbor's existing structures encroach onto the Land. 23. You are forced to remove Your existing structures which encroach onto an Easement or over a building set -back line, even if the Easement or building set -back line is excepted in Schedule B. 24. Your existing structures are damaged because of the exercise of a right to maintain or use any Easement affecting the Land, even if the Easement is excepted in Schedule B. 25. Your existing improvements (or a replacement or modification made to them after the Policy Date), including lawns, shrubbery or trees, are damaged because of the future exercise of a right to use the surface of the Land for the extraction or development of minerals, water or any other substance, even if those rights are excepted or reserved from the description of the Land or excepted in Schedule B. 26. Someone else tries to enforce a discriminatory covenant, condition or restriction that they claim affects Your Title which is based upon race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 27. A taxing authority assesses supplemental real estate taxes not previously assessed against the Land for any period before the Policy Date because of construction or a change of ownership or use that occurred before the Policy Date. 28. Your neighbor builds any structures after the Policy Date -- other than boundary walls or fences -- which encroach onto the Land. 29. Your Title is unmarketable, which allows someone else to refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make a Mortgage loan on it. 30. Someone else owns an interest in Your Title because a court order invalidates a prior transfer of the title under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. 31. The residence with the address shown in Schedule A is not located on the Land at the Policy Date. 32. The map, if any, attached to this Policy does not show the correct location of the Land according to the Public Records. OUR DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST LEGAL ACTIONS We will defend Your Title in any legal action only as to that part of the action which is based on a Covered Risk and which is not excepted or excluded from coverage in this Policy. We will pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses We incur in that defense. We will not pay for any part of the legal action which is not based on a Covered Risk or which is excepted or excluded from coverage in this Policy. We can end Our duty to defend Your Title under section 4 of the Conditions. This Policy is not complete without Schedules A and B. Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 3 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title of You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS a. Easement - the right of someone else to use the Land for a special purpose. b. Estate Planning Entity — a legal entity or Trust established by a Natural Person for estate planning. c. Known - things about which You have actual knowledge. The words "Know" and "Knowing" have the same meaning as Known. d. Land - the land or condominium unit described in paragraph 3 of Schedule A and any improvements on the Land which are real property. e. Mortgage - a mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. f. Natural Person - a human being, not a commercial or legal organization or entity. Natural Person includes a trustee of a Trust even if the trustee is not a human being. g. Policy Date - the date and time shown in Schedule A. If the insured named in Schedule A first acquires the interest shown in Schedule A by an instrument recorded in the Public Records later than the date and time shown in Schedule A, the Policy Date is the date and time the instrument is recorded. h. Public Records - records that give constructive notice of matters affecting Your Title, according to the state statutes where the Land is located. i. Title - the ownership of Your interest in the Land, as shown in Schedule A. j. Trust - a living trust established by a Natural Person for estate planning. k. We/Our/Us - First American Title Insurance Company. I. You Your - the insured named in Schedule A and also those identified in Section 2.b. of these Conditions. 2. CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE a. This Policy insures You forever, even after You no longer have Your Title. You cannot assign this Policy to anyone else. b. This Policy also insures: (1) anyone who inherits Your Title because of Your death; (2) Your spouse who receives Your Title because of dissolution of Your marriage; (3) the trustee or successor trustee of a Trust or any Estate Planning Entity to whom You transfer Your Title after the Policy Date; (4) the beneficiaries of Your Trust upon Your death; or (5) anyone who receives Your Title by a transfer effective on Your death as authorized by law. c. We may assert against the insureds identified in Section 2.b. any rights and defenses that We have against any previous insured under this Policy. 3. HOW TO MAKE A CLAIM a. Prompt Notice Of Your Claim (1) As soon as You Know of anything that might be covered by this Policy, You must notify Us promptly in writing. (2) Send Your notice to First American Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims National Intake Center, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707. Phone: 888-632-1642. Please include the Policy number shown in Schedule A, and the county and state where the Land is located. Please enclose a copy of Your policy, if available. (3) If You do not give Us prompt notice, Your coverage will be reduced or ended, but only to the extent Your failure affects Our ability to resolve the claim or defend You. b. Proof Of Your Loss (1) We may require You to give Us a written statement signed by You describing Your loss which includes: (a) the basis of Your claim; (b) the Covered Risks which resulted in Your loss; (c) the dollar amount of Your loss; and (d) the method You used to compute the amount of Your loss. Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 4 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) 4. S. CONDITIONS (Continued) (2) We may require You to make available to Us records, checks, letters, contracts, insurance policies and other papers which relate to Your claim. We may make copies of these papers. (3) We may require You to answer questions about Your claim under oath. (4) If you fail or refuse to give Us a statement of loss, answer Our questions under oath, or make available to Us the papers We request, Your coverage will be reduced or ended, but only to the extent Your failure or refusal affects Our ability to resolve the claim or defend You. OUR CHOICES WHEN WE LEARN OF A CLAIM a. After We receive Your notice, or otherwise learn, of a claim that is covered by this Policy, Our choices include one or more of the following: (1) Pay the claim; (2) Negotiate a settlement; (3) Bring or defend a legal action related to the claim; (4) Pay You the amount required by this Policy; (5) End the coverage of this Policy for the claim by paying You Your actual loss resulting from the Covered Risk, and those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to that time which We are obligated to pay; (6) End the coverage described in Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 or 21 by paying You the amount of Your insurance then in force for the particular Covered Risk, and those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to that time which We are obligated to pay; (7) End all coverage of this Policy by paying You the Policy Amount then in force, and those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to that time which We are obligated to pay; (8) Take other appropriate action. b. When We choose the options in Sections 4.a. (5), (6) or (7), all Our obligations for the claim end, including Our obligation to defend, or continue to defend, any legal action. c. Even if We do not think that the Policy covers the claim, We may choose one or more of the options above. By doing so, We do not give up any rights. HANDLING A CLAIM OR LEGAL ACTION a. You must cooperate with Us in handling any claim or legal action and give Us all relevant information. b. If You fail or refuse to cooperate with Us, Your coverage will be reduced or ended, but only to the extent Your failure or refusal affects Our ability to resolve the claim or defend You. c. We are required to repay You only for those settlement costs, attorneys' fees and expenses that We approve in advance. d. We have the right to choose the attorney when We bring or defend a legal action on Your behalf. We can appeal any decision to the highest level. We do not have to pay Your claim until the legal action is finally decided. e. Whether or not We agree there is coverage, We can bring or defend a legal action, or take other appropriate action under this Policy. By doing so, We do not give up any rights. 6. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY a. After subtracting Your Deductible Amount if it applies, We will pay no more than the least of: (1) Your actual loss; (2) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability then in force for the particular Covered Risk, for claims covered only under Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 or 21; or (3) the Policy Amount then in force. and any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses that We are obligated to pay under this Policy. b. If We pursue Our rights under Sections 4.a.(3) and 5.e. of these Conditions and are unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as insured: (1) the Policy Amount then in force will be increased by 10% of the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A, and (2) You shall have the right to have the actual loss determined on either the date the claim was made by You or the date it is settled and paid. c. (1) If We remove the cause of the claim with reasonable diligence after receiving notice of it, all Our obligations for the claim end, including any obligation for loss You had while We were removing the cause of the claim. (2) Regardless of 6.c.(1) above, if You cannot use the Land because of a claim covered by this Policy: (a) You may rent a reasonably equivalent substitute residence and We will repay You for the actual rent You pay, until the earlier of: (i) the cause of the claim is removed; or (ii) We pay You the amount required by this Policy. If Your claim is covered only under Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 or 21, that payment is the amount of Your insurance then in force for the particular Covered Risk. (b) We will pay reasonable costs You pay to relocate any personal property You have the right to remove from the Land, including transportation of that personal property for up to twenty-five (25) miles from the Land, and repair of any damage to that personal property because of the relocation. The amount We will pay You under this paragraph is limited to the value of the personal property before You relocate it. d. All payments We make under this Policy reduce the Policy Amount then in force, except for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses. All payments We make for claims which are covered only under Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 or 21 also reduce Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for the particular Covered Risk, except for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses. e. If We issue, or have issued, a Policy to the owner of a Mortgage that is on Your Title and We have not given You any coverage against the Mortgage, then: (1) We have the right to pay any amount due You under this Policy to the owner of the Mortgage, and any amount paid shall be treated as a payment to You under this Policy, including under Section 4.a. of these Conditions; (2) Any amount paid to the owner of the Mortgage shall be subtracted from the Policy Amount then in force; and Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 5 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) 7. CONDITIONS (Continued) (3) If Your claim is covered only under Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 or 21, any amount paid to the owner of the Mortgage shall also be subtracted from Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for the particular Covered Risk. f. If You do anything to affect any right of recovery You may have against someone else, We can subtract from Our liability the amount by which You reduced the value of that right. TRANSFER OF YOUR RIGHTS TO US a. When We settle Your claim, We have all the rights and remedies You have against any person or property related to the claim. You must not do anything to affect these rights and remedies. When We ask, You must execute documents to evidence the transfer to Us of these rights and remedies. You must let Us use Your name in enforcing these rights and remedies. b. We will not be liable to You if We do not pursue these rights and remedies or if We do not recover any amount that might be recoverable. c. We will pay any money We collect from enforcing these rights and remedies in the following order: (1) to Us for the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses We paid to enforce these rights and remedies; (2) to You for Your loss that You have not already collected; (3) to Us for any money We paid out under this Policy on account of Your claim; and (4) to You whatever is left. d. If You have rights and remedies under contracts (such as indemnities, guaranties, bonds or other policies of insurance) to recover all or part of Your loss, then We have all of those rights and remedies, even if those contracts provide that those obligated have all of Your rights and remedies under this Policy. 8. THIS POLICY IS THE ENTIRE CONTRACT This Policy, with any endorsements, is the entire contract between You and Us. To determine the meaning of any part of this Policy, You must read the entire Policy and any endorsements. Any changes to this Policy must be agreed to in writing by Us. Any claim You make against Us must be made under this Policy and is subject to its terms. 9. INCREASED POLICY AMOUNT The Policy Amount then in force will increase by ten percent (10%) of the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A each year for the first five years following the Policy Date shown in Schedule A, up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A. The increase each year will happen on the anniversary of the Policy Date shown in Schedule A. 10. SEVERABILITY If any part of this Policy is held to be legally unenforceable, both You and We can still enforce the rest of this Policy. 11. ARBITRATION a. If permitted in the state where the Land is located, You or We may demand arbitration. b. The law used in the arbitration is the law of the state where the Land is located. c. The arbitration shall be under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules'D. You can get a copy of the Rules from Us. d. Except as provided in the Rules, You cannot join or consolidate Your claim or controversy with claims or controversies of other persons. e. The arbitration shall be binding on both You and Us. The arbitration shall decide any matter in dispute between You and Us. f. The arbitration award may be entered as a judgment in the proper court. 12. CHOICE OF LAW The law of the state where the Land is located shall apply to this policy. In Witness Whereof, First American Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed by its authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. First American Title bsurance Company D�nrtiis.i Gdillof� Prasident Jeffr y S. RaNnzQn Secretary (This Policy is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached) Copyright 2006-2010 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 6 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) it t Am r ican "_., 40 Eagle Schedule A Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance For a One -To -Four Family Residence ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 5020500-3060623 Name and Address of Title Insurance Company FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707 File No.: 4244-3060623-A Premium: $1,530.00 Policy Amount: $567,800.00 Policy Date (and Time): June 29, 2018 at 5:35 p.m. Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability for Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21: Your Deductible Amount Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 (whichever is less) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liabilitv Street Address of the Land: 2301 Jones Ave NE, Renton, Washington 98056 1. Name of Insured: Stephan Jurgens 2. Your interest in the Land covered by this Policy is: Fee Simple 3. The Land referred to in this Policy is described as: $10,000 $25,000 $25,000 $5,000 Real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: THE NORTH 107 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF LOT 330, C. D. HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 7 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF APN:334450021004 Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 7 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) it t Am r ican "_., 40 Eagle Schedule B File No.: 4244-3060623-A Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance For a One -To -Four Family Residence ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 5020500-3060623 In addition to the Exclusions, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. General Taxes for the year 2018 The first half has been paid. The second half is payable, but not delinquent until November 1st. Tax Account No.: 334450021004 2. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Ordinance No. 3860" Recorded: November 09, 1984 Recording No.: 8411090689 3. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Ordinance Number 4362" Recorded: September 02, 1992 Recording No.: 9209021077 4. Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, boundary discrepancies or encroachments, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat of C. D. Hillman's Garden of Eden Division No. 5 recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page(s) 83. 5. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Notice of On -Site Sewage System Operation and Maintenance Requirements" Recorded: June 29, 2018 Recording No.: 20180629002118 6. Deed of Trust/Mortgage and terms and conditions thereof: Trustor/Grantor: Stephan Jurgens, an unmarried person Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), solely as nominee for BNC National Bank Amount: $454,240.00 Dated: June 29, 2018 Recorded: June 29, 2018 Recording No.: 20180629002120 Form 5020500 (7-1-14) Page 8 of 8 Policy Number: 3060623 ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (Rev. 2-3-10) Instrument Number: 20180629002118 Document:OSS Rec: 5102.00 Page -1 of 4 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM Electronically Recorded King County, WA RETURN ADDRESS First American Title 11400 SE 8th Street, Suite 250 Bellevue, WA. 98026 Please print neatly or type information Document Title: NOTICE OF ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Reference Number(s) of Related Documents Grantor(s) (Last, First, and Middle Initial) Au Yeung, Kin S. Grantees(s) (Last, First, Middle Initial) THE PUBLIC Additional Reference #s on page Additional Grantors on page Legal Description (abbreviated form: lot, block, plat or section, township, range, quarter/quarter) PTN LOT 330, C. D. HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN DIV. NO. 5, VOL. 11, P. 83, KING COUNTY Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number ��aasnn�tnna Additional Legal is on page Additional Parcel #s on page The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the documents to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. Instrument Number: 20180629002118 Document:OSS Rec: 5102.00 Page -2 of 4 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM King County, WA Form 22U ©Copyright 2009 Seller's Notice of OSS NOTICE OF ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM Northwest Multiple Listing Service Rev. 1/09 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Pages 2 of 3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Continued Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 334450021004 1. I/We (print) Kin Shing An Yeung are the owners of real property within King County, which is legally described as follows: 2. The above-described real property is served by an on-site sewage system ("OSS"). 3. The Code of the King County Board of Health, Section 13.60.005 establishes certain responsibilities of the OSS owner with respect to the operation and maintenance of an On-site Sewage System, as follows: A. The OSS owner is responsible for the continuous proper operation and maintenance of the OSS, and shall: 1. Determine the level of solids and scum in the septic tank at least once every three (3) years for residential system with no garbage grinder and once every year if a garbage grinder is installed and, unless otherwise provided in writing by the health officer, once every year for commercial systems. 2. Employ an approved pumper to remove the septage from the tank when the level of solids and scum indicates that removal is necessary. 3. Cause preventive maintenance/system performance monitoring inspections to be conducted and any indicated service to be performed by an approved person at a minimum frequency in accordance with Table 13.60-1 unless otherwise established by the health officer or the sewage review committee. Table 13.60-1 Minimum Frequencyof Preventive Maintenance/Performance Monitoring Table 13.60-1 Explanatory Notes (1) The initial inspection is to be performed at the time interval indicated following occupancy. (2) Public domain technology includes such systems as: mounds, intermittent sand filters and pressure distribution. (3) Proprietary Technology includes such systems as: ATUs, Glendon up -flow filters, Advantex pack bed filters and subsurface drip. (4) At least an annual septic tank maintenance check is required if the structure served is equipped with a garbage grinder waste disposal unit. If a screened outlet baffle is present an annual check is recommended. Pumpers shall report each pumping event to the health officer in accordance with BOH chapter 13.68. (5) Table 13.60-1 specifies the minimum required monitoring frequency. A more stringent monitoring frequency shall be used if recommended by the manufacturer. (6) This monitoring is in addition to that required for the OSS receiving the building's non -toilet liquid waste. (KCBOH) Note about Monitoring Frequency: The above table reflects the King County BOH Title 13 code dated September 2008. The King County BOH Title 13 code is subject to,change. Gravity Public Domain Proprietary Commercial and Food Non -Discharging System (4) Technology (2) Technology (3, 5) Establishments Toilets (6) Initial 6 months 6 months 45 days 45 days N/A Inspection 1 Regular Inspection Every 3 years Annually Every 6 months Annually or Every 6 months. Annually Frequency Who May Owner, Licensed Perforin the Maintainer or Licensed Licensed Licensed Owner Licensed OSS Maintainer Maintainer Maintainer Inspection Pumper Table 13.60-1 Explanatory Notes (1) The initial inspection is to be performed at the time interval indicated following occupancy. (2) Public domain technology includes such systems as: mounds, intermittent sand filters and pressure distribution. (3) Proprietary Technology includes such systems as: ATUs, Glendon up -flow filters, Advantex pack bed filters and subsurface drip. (4) At least an annual septic tank maintenance check is required if the structure served is equipped with a garbage grinder waste disposal unit. If a screened outlet baffle is present an annual check is recommended. Pumpers shall report each pumping event to the health officer in accordance with BOH chapter 13.68. (5) Table 13.60-1 specifies the minimum required monitoring frequency. A more stringent monitoring frequency shall be used if recommended by the manufacturer. (6) This monitoring is in addition to that required for the OSS receiving the building's non -toilet liquid waste. (KCBOH) Note about Monitoring Frequency: The above table reflects the King County BOH Title 13 code dated September 2008. The King County BOH Title 13 code is subject to,change. Instrument Number: 20180629002118 Document:OSS Rec: 5102.00 Page -3 of 4 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM King County, WA Form 22U ©Copyright 2009 Seller's Notice of OSS NOTICE OF ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM Northwest Multiple Listing Service Rev. 1/09 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Pages 3 of 3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Continued 4. Operate and maintain all OSS in accordance with this title, with pertinent alternative system guidelines issued by the DOH [State of Washington Department of Health] and with the approved OSS owner's operating and maintenance instruction manual. 5. Protect the OSS area including the reserve area from: a. Cover by structures or impervious material; b. Surface drainage; c. Soil compaction, for example, by vehicular traffic or livestock; and d. Damage by soil removal and grade alteration. 6. Maintain the flow of sewage to the OSS at or below the approved design both in quantity and waste strength. 7. Direct drains, such as footing or roof drains away from the area where the OSS is located. B. The owner shall not allow: 1. Use or introduction of strong bases, strong acids or organic solvents into an OSS for the purpose of system cleaning; 2. Use of sewage system additives unless it is specifically approved by the DOH; or 3. Use of an OSS to dispose of waste components atypical of residential wastewater, for example, but not limited to, petroleum products, paints, solvents, or pesticides. 4. Note about Operation and Maintenance Program Fee: Rules and Regulations 02-01, amendment to the Code of the King County Board of Health, states, "At the time of sale or transfer of property ownership, the buyer or transferee of a property served by an OSS shall forward to the health officer a fee as set forth in the fee schedule and submit a signed copy of the notice on title as set forth in Section 13.56.054A." This fee is $40.00 per the Rules and Regulations 02-01, effective June 17, 2002. Seller Date Seller Date STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY QF. KING On this [ day of ss: (month) (year) , before me personally appeared Kin Shing An Yeung and N/A , to me known to be the individual(s) described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed for e us t es and purposes herein stated. Y Given under m hand and official seal t [ 5 day of ajAL t (month) (year) QAVID E JOHANSEN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 29, 2018 Pri - me: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of VO Washington, Residing at: My Appointment Expires: '{ 7-61 47,6 Instrument Number: 20180629002118 Document:OSS Rec: 5102.00 Page -4 of 4 Record Date:6/29/2018 5:35 PM King County, WA EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: THE NORTH 107 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF LOT 330, C. D. HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME it OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 7 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF Tax Parcel ID No. 334450021004 iN/�, 9 J r r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CITY OF AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton ' AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 1 www.rentonwa.go� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1. I, 4 WHAA/ JvRG&N3 , certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: rw 2. On the day of � A'NyhRy , 20 20 , 1 installed public information sign(s) on the property located at 2301 Jo elC-g AVE N,r<� RP+vnaN, w4 for the following project: 0056* J U atz GF + RB r nEwtiF 4-5n i aom Project Name 5�xeH+4N Jtl2 c•gvx Owner Name 3. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 4. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 8 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" handout package. Installer Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me thie/9-- day of K k4e-, , 20 Z V AAMAAN JAZAYERI NOTARY UBLIC in nd fr the Sta� Of Washington, Notary Public residing at i( _ Ay p Sel I`�} a, UA Qf 6 C State of Washington My Appointment Expires Nov 10, 2020 My commission expires on 11 Id LZ 0 C:\Users�cclose\Desktop\Work\Handouts\Pub info Sign Handout.docx Rev. 02/2017 0 ca � o oOD y C m O O Q @ O c6 'O Y � � > v �_ U � � c O N v N m d .U. f0 r cA N � Q o o N f6 � s a c o O O � � 'o C7 � Vl O O a N a T � LLi U U � a a U Q C 3 3 a oa oa w. w. _O C C c m @ m m m c N d m O o m � Z c� c c vi � �. 3 � � U m m m m m��`m 12 � � c6 c0 N N Y w w � � � O O � E w a a a � w O w -6 c6 O O O c6 f6 c +y �UUaaU U�I�� II II II F- mm�F-ate cn �p ■ J Q 0 da U J I.� O Bey Z a Z G +O o r F� m o m O O ' � O O Q N L m 0 to EEmn E o f E 0 O iy E O o O 0 E c w { (n 7 M � E O N CL ' QI. M o-aU O 7 O @ Z s} O N L y CL � 9 C F- @ Q -O T � m y O O LL O m N N H p C4 O {y cri, O� c � � J U _N N Q ■� E 2 - 00 0 AN And SANOf AN AAV SANOr ° Co O X a T= 0 r __ C C {y t rt Q d O N d Q ~ {v w1 fn (a6 O �i l- r+ CjO ti E O O ■ O W N O Ate+ W � O Z ie } V-_- 's} L LL CO N N p} M x � N Q f� LO M cJ rte+ CID V fi l ' O cfci � I � N r d �I � o I I o v o # rn �n O tr mm�F-ate cn ■ J Q da J I.� Z T— C) C) N KM�M I N N T z O r) r) W U z W 0 W rr v07/11 z W' rr D z n W I-- Cl) V ) O 3N 3AV S3NOf N m Z �-2¢ yocr C7 LL Z � Y OLL W LL W mmo N 0 z W (D W J LL W LL LL.LLLL.LLLL. eE,LL w±- 0 Cn C/)Cn C/)Cn U) Cn 00 U) C/) W LL. LL. LL � LL LL � OO LO LO TTO N�<ON CV C) Lr) LO 00 O(�CD �O� 00 01)0') CO Cl) CON W TC0 Q r LO Ln C/D N vi N N C\C\L6 LO H L LU L W o z Ln (D O co � N L _ Z w LU = z W W Ir CC W D D F- CO LLLO QUU 0 J LU OWM H W D D w Z LL W Q U)C/)Z LUQ F N W JJ dD W D mLL U) N Qw 0<22 00 0 OWWEO o z LLOLLLL .—cr U QO==m z� °Cw_j_j w} Dao? 00 o 0O?U)U) co ?� 0Owc�i)0D WM0 WM0 U UQ wM�ZmCOOC 0 D w�rCV =) LL 0 0 Jw CO <m0>-QQ H P Ir Ir Cr J H U w J m W Q Z Cr� W } U)U)00cl 0Z�W QQCn�Z� W U)ZM W H H 000<CA Cn LY ��? 0 Q 0 LL M D O LL LL M m 00 O IL z<CLC) IL z LU O LO C7 z LO LL. �k 0 O OoO 60i 00�z z� �wZ50 awo0 ��0¢ zFO w-0 z C/)Jm� 0 ` 2 OM LL co U000 OL UW LL � LL z J Q w Oc'SdU)O wwLU 00 Uv)zoz U crzw0 W O Q W � HX W w U m Z _w OXLL<m M OW00 n LL W LL LL.LLLL.LLLL. eE,LL w±- 0 Cn C/)Cn C/)Cn U) Cn 00 U) C/) W LL. LL. LL � LL LL � OO LO LO TTO N�<ON CV C) Lr) LO 00 O(�CD �O� 00 01)0') CO Cl) CON W TC0 Q r LO Ln C/D N vi N N C\C\L6 LO H L LU L W o z Ln (D O co � N L _ Z w LU = z W W Ir CC W D D F- CO LLLO QUU 0 J LU OWM H W D D w Z LL W Q U)C/)Z LUQ F N W JJ dD W D mLL U) N Qw 0<22 00 0 OWWEO o z LLOLLLL .—cr U QO==m z� °Cw_j_j w} Dao? 00 o 0O?U)U) co ?� 0Owc�i)0D WM0 WM0 U UQ wM�ZmCOOC 0 D w�rCV =) LL 0 0 Jw CO <m0>-QQ H P Ir Ir Cr J H U w J m W Q Z Cr� W } U)U)00cl 0Z�W QQCn�Z� W U)ZM W H H 000<CA Cn LY ��? 0 Q 0 LL M D O LL LL M m 00 O IL z<CLC) IL z LO LO LL. �k 0 O 60i z� a oL w z LL co O 0�: z wwLU 00 LY � Qw LLI z Or- w > >zU) > Q z U) O J J LU z LL z Q U 20 0 LU w CV 0 = LL Cn U)Q JLU M LLLL LU 0 b Q LL W LL LL.LLLL.LLLL. eE,LL w±- 0 Cn C/)Cn C/)Cn U) Cn 00 U) C/) W LL. LL. LL � LL LL � OO LO LO TTO N�<ON CV C) Lr) LO 00 O(�CD �O� 00 01)0') CO Cl) CON W TC0 Q r LO Ln C/D N vi N N C\C\L6 LO H L LU L W o z Ln (D O co � N L _ Z w LU = z W W Ir CC W D D F- CO LLLO QUU 0 J LU OWM H W D D w Z LL W Q U)C/)Z LUQ F N W JJ dD W D mLL U) N Qw 0<22 00 0 OWWEO o z LLOLLLL .—cr U QO==m z� °Cw_j_j w} Dao? 00 o 0O?U)U) co ?� 0Owc�i)0D WM0 WM0 U UQ wM�ZmCOOC 0 D w�rCV =) LL 0 0 Jw CO <m0>-QQ H P Ir Ir Cr J H U w J m W Q Z Cr� W } U)U)00cl 0Z�W QQCn�Z� W U)ZM W H H 000<CA Cn LY ��? 0 Q 0 LL M D O LL LL M m 00 O IL z<CLC) IL z O 0 0 Q LU U z W 0 U) W rr U) z W (D D z Q J n O O J H (I) T z O 0 0 Q LU U Z W 0 W Z W 0 rr Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 Office (425) 333-4535 Fax (425) 333-4509 July 8, 2019 Steve Jurgens Sjurgens22@gmail.com SUBJECT: Wetland and Stream Review for Jurgens Property 2301 Jones Ave. NE, Parcel 334450-0210 Renton, WA Dear Steve: Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture AOA -5910 On May 21, 2019 1 conducted a wetland and stream reconnaissance on the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the May 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). The site is currently developed with your existing residence, gravel parking areas, and yard. Kennydale Creek flows from southeast to northwest through the yard in the northeast corner of the site. One wetland (Wetland A) was observed along the creek within a broad topographic swale immediately off-site to the north. The southern boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of your north property line was delineated with pink flagging numbered A-1 through A-6 during the site review. Wetland A and Kennydale Creek Wetland A consists of a Riverine Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) class wetland containing a forested plant community that included black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), red alder (Alnus rubra), Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), lady fern (Athyrium filix- femina), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum). Hydrologic support to the wetland appears to be from both groundwater seepage and overbank flooding. Wetland A was determined to meet the criteria for a Category I I wetland with 4 Habitat Points (Attachment A). Category II wetlands with 4 Habitat Points require a standard 100 -foot buffer and 15 -foot building setback per RMC 4-3-050.G.2. It is my understanding that Kennydale Creek is considered a Type Np stream and requires a standard 75 -foot buffer plus 15 -foot building setback. Steve Jurgens July 8, 2019 Page 2 Existing Wetland and Stream Functions and Values Wetlands, in general, provide many valuable ecological and social functions, including stormwater storage, water quality protection, groundwater recharge and discharge, and wildlife habitat. Wetland A has the capacity to provide many of these functions. Although limited, the wetland does provide some stormwater storage that helps reduce downstream flooding while also trapping sediments. The trapping of sediments and other pollutants within the wetland maintains water quality in downstream areas and aids in the prevention of fish habitat degradation by limiting silt accumulation within spawning areas. The wetland provides further benefit to fish and other wildlife by releasing water slowly during the dry summer months, thereby contributing to the base flow of the stream. In addition to its hydrologic functions, the wetland also provides biological functions. The wetland provides habitat for a variety of wildlife species typical of suburban habitats within the Puget Sound lowlands. Another important biologic function of the wetland is the transport of nutrients to downstream areas. Nutrients transported to downstream areas provide biological support for fish and other aquatic wildlife. The wetland does provide some limited cultural wetland functions as part of the overall open space corridor associated with Kennydale Creek. Proposed Project It is my understanding that you are proposing an addition to your single- family residence. Due to the location of the existing structure, the addition must be constructed within the buffer to the north of the house. The area of the proposed expansion currently consists entirely of existing gravel parking and no significant vegetation would be removed as part of your proposed project. The buffer area associated with your proposed expansion does not currently provide any functional benefit to the wetland and stream. It is also my understanding that as part of the project you are proposing to plant a variety of native tree and shrub species along the north property line and adjacent Kennydale Creek to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffers. These plantings would provide a physical and visual screen to the wetland and stream from the residence and would increase the habitat and protection functions of the buffer over current conditions. Since there should be no increase in pollution generating surfaces associated with the project, there are no anticipated hydrologic impacts to the wetland. Steve Jurgens July 8, 2019 Page 3 Recommendation Since it is not possible to develop the expansion outside of the standard or reduced buffers on the site, the project can only occur utilizing an alternate buffer that meets all of the criteria outlined in RMC 4-3-050.G.9.d.ii. These criteria include the preparation of a buffer enhancement planting plan that would demonstrate an increase in the functions of the buffer over current conditions. It is my recommendation that a meeting be held with the City of Renton Planning Department to determine whether an alternate buffer would likely be approved prior to the preparation of detailed site plans. If you have any questions, please call me at (425) 333-4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachments U I IA • ;� a 0 `¢y C) N wwa C) a� o LL U) rn oD w Lr) oo a a-' i �O o i a 0 ra O �• 4—J m � IA ro c O � M o o C) c +J N ce 0 a G c • ;� a 0 a c O u C) N v a� o LL U) C) Ln M oD Q oo ■ a-' i �O U N (n 0) i a U ra O �• 4—J m � L 5= -0 n m •�� U a� a 0 ro c O � M o o C) c +J N ce 0 a G c • ;� a m a c O u C) N v Ln o LL U) C) Ln M oD Q oo ■ CD Y � � w C) • ;� a m m Q C) N m m Q C) N Ln C) Ln M ro U Q ru Lo O U N n L 0 a-' i �O U N (n 0) i a QH -a fz +� N ra O �• s- m m � m o 5= -0 n m •�� Q a� a 0 w a 0 0 -6J 0 a 0 4-1 a 0 . cn Q a Q a Q a i2 a Q a 00 S2 a Wetland name or number A RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): 334450-0210 Date of site visit: 5/21/2019 Rated by Altmann Trained by Ecology?21 YesE] No Date of training 03/08 & 03/15 HGM Class used for rating Riverine & Fresh Water Tidal Wetland has multiple HGM classes? 21 Yes ❑ No NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map King County iMAP OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY II (based on functions o or special characteristics El ) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 X Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 - 19 Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Improving Hydrologic Habitat FUNCTION Bog Mature Forest Water Quality Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon List appropriate rating (H, M, L) Site Potential M H L Landscape Potential H H L Value H M M Total Score Based on 8 8 4 20 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9=H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3=L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A RIVERINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality R 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? R 1.1. Area of surface depressions within the Riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a 1 flooding event: 1 Depressions cover > 3/4 area of wetland points = 8 2 Depressions cover >'/2 area of wetland points = 4 Depressions present but cover <'/2 area of wetland points = 2 1 No depressions present points = 0 R 1.2. Structure of plants in the wetland (areas with >90% cover at person height, not Cowardin 2 classes) 0 Trees or shrubs > 2/3 area of the wetland points = 8 ° Trees or shrubs >'/3 area of the wetland points = 6 8 ° Herbaceous plants (> 6 in high) > 2/3 area of the wetland points = 6 Herbaceous plants (> 6 in high) >'/3 area of the wetland points = 3 Trees, shrubs, and ungrazed herbaceous <'/3 area of the wetland points = 0 Total for R 1 Add the points in the boxes abovel 10 Rating of Site Potential If score is: El 12 -16 = H o 6 - 11 = M ° 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page R 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? R2.1. Is the wetland within an incorporated city or within its UGA? Yes = 2 No = 0 2 R 2.2. Does the contributing basin to the wetland include a UGA or 1 incorporated area? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 R 2.3. Does at least 10% of the contributing basin contain tilled fields, 0 pastures, or forests that have been clearcut within the last 5 years? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 2.4. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that 1 generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 2.5. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are 2 not listed in questions R 2.1 - R 2.4? 0 Other Sources Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for R 2 Add the points in the boxes above 4 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 0 3 - 6 = H ° 1 or 2 = M ° 0 = L Record the rating on the first page R 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? R 3.1. Is the wetland along a stream or river that is on the 303(d) list or on a 1 tributary that drains to one within 1 mi? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 3.2. Is the wetland along a stream or river that has TMDL limits for nutrients, 1 toxics, or pathogens? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the drainage in 0 which the unit is found) Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for R 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is: 0 2 - 4 = H ° 1 = M ° 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 5 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A RIVERINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion R 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? R 4.1. Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel (distance between banks). Calculate the ratio: (average width of 1 wetland)/(average width of stream between banks). If the ratio is more than 20 points = 9 6 If the ratio is 10 - 20 points = 6 If the ratio is 5 - < 10 points = 4 0 If the ratio is 1 - < 5 points = 2 If the ratio is < 1 points = 1 1 R 4.2. Characteristics of plants that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris as forest or shrub. Choose the points appropriate for the best description (polygons need to have >90% cover at person height. These are NOT Cowardin classes). Forest or shrub for >'/3 area OR emergent plants > 2/3 area points = 7 7 Forest or shrub for >'/10 area OR emergent plants >'/3 area points = 4 Plants do not meet above criteria points = 0 Total for R 4 Add the points in the boxes abovel 13 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 0 12 -16 = H El 6 - 11 = M El 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page R 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? R 5.1. Is the stream or river adjacent to the wetland downcut? Yes = 0 No = 1 1 R 5.2. Does the up -gradient watershed include a UGA or incorporated area? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 R 5.3 Is the up -gradient stream or river controlled by dams? Yes = 0 No = 1 1 Total for R 5 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 0 3 = H L1 1 or 2 = M 01 0 = L Record the rating on the first page R 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? R 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems? Choose the description that best fits the site. The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of the wetland has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural 1 resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 R 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood 0 conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for R 6 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Value If score is: El 2- 4= H o 1= M El 0= L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 6 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 1 o Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points - 1 o Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: Q The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or'/4 ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 2 o Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 ID Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 o Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland El Lake Fringe wetland 2 points o Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle 1 If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. o a 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 vvetlano name or numoer A H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. o Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) o Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) 2 ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least'/ ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) ❑ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes abovel 6 Rating of Site Potential If Score is: ❑ 15 - 18 = H ❑ 7 -14 = M o 0 - 6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: 0 % undisturbed habitat + ( 0.03 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 0.015% If total accessible habitat is: 0 >'/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: 12.8 % undisturbed habitat + ( 15.1 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 20.35% watershed plan 2 Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) -2 <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: ❑ 4 - 6 = H ❑ 1 - 3 = M o < 1 = L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species 1 ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ❑ It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If Score is: ❑ 2 = H o 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Wetlani9 Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 8 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/phs/list/ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. 0 Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). o Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). E] Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ° Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 — see web link above). ID Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 — see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. E] Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 �= O _ NO O, u G .b E 0 LU o .--I Z Ln N Q)O O Q Ol� p 6 L Ln ro � � M O � M O O CD c >1 +� N c U a O D Ol cn C O O Q o U ro V) +� ro U N ro 4-J 4-+ ro' ru O Q Y Q Z M O O 41 2 F) = o 00 4O+ _ ro O I v 0 N V > Q)' ro u 4J E41M.—A O O O M O O O N O O O O O LO C7 0 Ln � o ro O 2 M C ate-+ 4 C ro roro V) N C O 4-J J 2 r LL t ' v 01,4 CO o ao N O NX �k ti \\\ : co 0 A M, Ln 7) • 0) _rte _ j�� �' (n -- _ fa U w.MRfro QO T f0 O O �' O O LU O d N O O Lr)r e Q O N a V) C=G = �" "1 1 -'+ -.^."• f . -. e _ "•l 4-j X O O M man 0 4-1 O O U fl O ` n = 0 O a+N�Ud ®1 ` N m CD = '0 M M '0 M M C6 2i, U m Q Ln It It It N 1-1 ' U Ln It m Q It It N 1-1 N cn O O O O O O O O O O O O L N N N N a.a.a.a. U U U U N N a.a. U U aN aN 0 U U aN aN U U aN U aN U a ti '2 1♦ I d N �4j LL a ti '2 �U L U J2Y 1 I W z z 3N any uo1Aeq -Irl ;,,:,: - ;1 j1 m � C Y Qr� 3N aAduosJall a!- °'2d eX Ave NE o J TIIJeH r Z` N C J m z 1 IN JA. uaapJaW U U L � � L N N W W z N any Atiope%oi L co N Q, z in C5 N aAy Ved = z (J'i L Vi CL L1 E—L Vl (h z N OND f` �'S z z z z z N M 2 M `) M cZ 7 ry N aAy 11auing I JlJA'' a^V ma1A-UII2V-p�',l 3N aAV GRIO«,n3 %,p I'. •,C1 H9h Ave NE_T�._ lhJ =''t1 �lel8 �n w z IN a.,y AaJa1L, 3N aAy �01V.auUa)� i l i i n law� N Q — � . i 8/25/2018 TMDL Project Information for WRIA 8 1 WA State Department of Ecology lhftp://www.ecy.wa.gov:80/programs/wq/tmd[fTMDLsbyWria/tmdl-wriaO8.html F—Go-1 NOV MAi, OCT Q 0 15 captures i 30 ♦ E 26 Jul 2009 - 24 Oct 2017 2015 1017 2018 W - >� DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY State of Washington Home Water Quality & Supply Figure D Waste & Toxics Water Quality Improvement > Water Quality Improvement Projects by WRIA > WRIA 8: Cedar-Sammamish WRIA 8: Cedar-Sammamish The following table lists overview information for water quality improvement projects (including total maximum daily loads, or TMDLs) for this water resource inventory area (WRIA). Please use links (where available) for more information on a project. Counties • King, Snohomish Air & Climate Waterbody Name Pollutants Status** TMDL Lead Ballinger Lake Total Phosphorus Approved by EPA Tricia Shoblom 425-649-7288 Bear -Evans Creek Basin Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Dissolved Oxygen Approved by EPA Temperature Cottage Lake Total Phosphorus Approved by EPA Tricia Shoblom Has an implementation 425-649-7288 plan Issaquah Creek Basin Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Little Bear Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Moh EKdL9k Tributaries: 425-649-7036 Trout Stream Great Dane Creek Cutthroat Creek North Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA 1WW SvrjQ1 Has an implementation 425-649-7036 plan Pipers Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Sammamish River Dissolved Oxygen Field work starts summer Ralph Svrjcek Temperature 2015 425-649-7036 Swamp Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Ralph SvrjLek Has an implementation 425-649-7036 plan * * Status will be listed as one of the following: Approved by EPA, Under Development or Implementation For more information about WRIA 8: • Waterbodies in WRIA 8 - using the Water Quality Assessment Query Tool Watershed Information for WRIA 8 * The Department of Ecology and other state resource agencies frequently use a system of 62 "Water Resource Inventory Areas" or "WRIAs" to refer to the state's major watershed basins. About us I Contact us http://web.archive.org/web/20170330212555/http:/Www.ecy.wa.gov:801programs/wq/tmdlITMDLsbyWria/tmdl-wriaO8.html 1/2 W O .--i Z LOn N N O O CID Q m o LnLn 1 O M O M rn C 0 0 w 1-4 oc >1 N de U d •' r � n yy♦y♦e♦iyy •• • r ! e > ♦ ♦ ! �!!♦yidyy♦y!t♦y>!!y♦y!y>iiylt�y♦�1�♦� y♦y♦y♦ • � ♦el:y i'i!iiiile♦-♦o: � �'ie:' s♦c°:al�l�♦�!�! iyiyi/i i � � v •♦!♦♦♦♦t►!!♦.♦♦!!♦O!!♦♦i♦♦♦♦i♦4•'r!i �'>'s�Sac� �tJili♦epi . � w!� . iii:♦ • EO♦mow♦♦>♦♦♦>♦!!♦♦♦�.�♦t'•'!♦A♦♦wE 91>�>E � 1 � i®♦J49.!♦�!!♦♦♦y♦!♦♦♦!♦♦i♦♦!� iti►�►i� !!♦moi O♦♦AJaAalllJNlA�Oi i� 4 tsi !>!!♦y♦y!♦i!? ��Nr►�♦i♦y♦yNNA .Jlbt'Ag•►=+La�y♦y1�Q!♦,=� byeyly !iv :` i iii!!♦Ot'�♦!♦Ci!!J•�L�w♦1i�9♦!•iA♦N♦ �!!♦!♦♦♦♦ �►♦♦♦ °isi�: !>d�i' � = a s°i i��!%�iM�!�:�yly�y� �♦�y� 3♦y♦ �yY�♦yYy♦yt:♦+IyJJ�i�y�y♦y►;>�y>y♦�♦y♦yP �y1y♦ `�♦�i � �i>♦!♦!!♦!!`�i�� i G�1♦♦♦i♦!�♦tai►♦♦!♦�lt�!!♦ ��i4>'��♦!♦♦>!1'y♦♦♦♦♦ice >♦♦!!♦♦♦!!t`•`>!�?>!>w♦h!♦♦♦♦ ♦y♦y♦i!9! �� y3y♦y♦iN !'►♦ ♦♦y♦y!�•e♦�1�t�♦psi ♦�!,♦,t: !i!i♦i!i♦i��! ! !♦i/i�lli�� r, "> � `, � y®ti! !!i♦iiia. i ! !�%>♦!♦♦`�♦�! i-4!♦>� ! 4 Oma! ♦♦!i♦♦♦� ♦!♦♦♦A!!!I ♦♦♦.4ywl r ♦♦♦♦♦1 ♦!>�i'i i �iylyiyly.,,.ylyiyli� z�e�p>�i♦yeyaysy. ♦♦y�►>N�>y♦ u II �yy^y��-y> j♦ jiyiy!►i j♦ jt;� yii4�R.p'9! `!>4j'►y♦ III •i►' :�i ;�:' �� is .......... s.°3i>i♦ Vii''. ig - t _- ti.. zs, zQ N Cu LL. o� 0 'Il'N TC-) O O OI O N O O CD O O C'7 C) O � bCla� w•C U .�+ ■--1 r� a b C �y U waa `¢y s a w Ln O OO O S -•I o OO OCIS 3 Ln :D m° O LU Mfo 0) M M W O .--i Z LOn N N O O CID Q m o LnLn 1 O M O M rn C 0 0 w 1-4 oc >1 N de U d •' r � n yy♦y♦e♦iyy •• • r ! e > ♦ ♦ ! �!!♦yidyy♦y!t♦y>!!y♦y!y>iiylt�y♦�1�♦� y♦y♦y♦ • � ♦el:y i'i!iiiile♦-♦o: � �'ie:' s♦c°:al�l�♦�!�! iyiyi/i i � � v •♦!♦♦♦♦t►!!♦.♦♦!!♦O!!♦♦i♦♦♦♦i♦4•'r!i �'>'s�Sac� �tJili♦epi . � w!� . iii:♦ • EO♦mow♦♦>♦♦♦>♦!!♦♦♦�.�♦t'•'!♦A♦♦wE 91>�>E � 1 � i®♦J49.!♦�!!♦♦♦y♦!♦♦♦!♦♦i♦♦!� iti►�►i� !!♦moi O♦♦AJaAalllJNlA�Oi i� 4 tsi !>!!♦y♦y!♦i!? ��Nr►�♦i♦y♦yNNA .Jlbt'Ag•►=+La�y♦y1�Q!♦,=� byeyly !iv :` i iii!!♦Ot'�♦!♦Ci!!J•�L�w♦1i�9♦!•iA♦N♦ �!!♦!♦♦♦♦ �►♦♦♦ °isi�: !>d�i' � = a s°i i��!%�iM�!�:�yly�y� �♦�y� 3♦y♦ �yY�♦yYy♦yt:♦+IyJJ�i�y�y♦y►;>�y>y♦�♦y♦yP �y1y♦ `�♦�i � �i>♦!♦!!♦!!`�i�� i G�1♦♦♦i♦!�♦tai►♦♦!♦�lt�!!♦ ��i4>'��♦!♦♦>!1'y♦♦♦♦♦ice >♦♦!!♦♦♦!!t`•`>!�?>!>w♦h!♦♦♦♦ ♦y♦y♦i!9! �� y3y♦y♦iN !'►♦ ♦♦y♦y!�•e♦�1�t�♦psi ♦�!,♦,t: !i!i♦i!i♦i��! ! !♦i/i�lli�� r, "> � `, � y®ti! !!i♦iiia. i ! !�%>♦!♦♦`�♦�! i-4!♦>� ! 4 Oma! ♦♦!i♦♦♦� ♦!♦♦♦A!!!I ♦♦♦.4ywl r ♦♦♦♦♦1 ♦!>�i'i i �iylyiyly.,,.ylyiyli� z�e�p>�i♦yeyaysy. ♦♦y�►>N�>y♦ u II �yy^y��-y> j♦ jiyiy!►i j♦ jt;� yii4�R.p'9! `!>4j'►y♦ III •i►' :�i ;�:' �� is .......... s.°3i>i♦ Vii''. ig - t _- ti.. zs, zQ N Cu LL. o� 0 'Il'N TC-) O O OI O N O O CD O O C'7 C) ■--1 N O +' OO Ln :D C Mfo M 4-jfa m M � CT • C Q L - t= fu O J a' O .27 f1300 U O 4-J ro C:ry a E 5 E U N O U 0- H H E- n Q Y Q 00 Jurgens Residence Addition Wetland Mitigation Plan Since it is not possible to develop outside of the standard or reduced wetland buffers at 2301 Jones Ave NE, the project can only occur with approval of a Reasonable Use variance that includes the following proposed wetland mitigation plan to increase the functions of the buffer over current conditions. Per the Wetland Study Report provided by Altmann Oliver Associates dated 07/08/2019, the wetland buffer area that is associated with the proposed project does not currently provide any functional benefit to the wetland. The area of the proposed project currently consists entirely of existing gravel parking and no significant vegetation would be removed as part of the project. Referencing the Wetland Mitigation Site Plan, due to the location of the existing structure, significant trees, Kennydale Creek, steep slope, septic field and existing vegetation, the addition must be constructed within the wetland buffer to the north of the existing single family structure. This is also the most ideal location for the project, in that it is located on an existing impervious gravel surface and no additional pollution generating surfaces would be created, thus no hydrologic impacts to the wetland. In order to improve the condition of the wetland buffer, the proposed project includes removing approximately 2,250 SF of gravel driveway adjacent to the south edge of the wetland and replacing with grass. This square footage of buffer restoration is greater than a 1:1 ratio in comparison to the 1,523 net square footage of the proposed addition. Additionally, a row of 15 native Western Red Cedar trees have recently been planted along the south edge of the wetland (trees are not part of this mitigation plan, but rather a recent improvement to the wetland buffer). In whole, these plantings will provide a physical and visual screen to the wetland and will increase the habitat and protection functions of the buffer over current conditions. Regarding protection of the wetland during construction, all construction activities and storage would be located upon existing gravel driveway and parking areas. Care will also be exercised to limit and/or restrict usage of those areas nearby the wetland, creek, and tree drip lines. _ »»emr loo L / \ ƒ :3 LL CO / w � LL 7/ a / \ z I CO w I < w \ t /k/\ / < \ \ LU 4 z i 3 LU ƒ 2 \� w w w @ ƒ QD 7 \ u\\ o C) k 3 » \ i a � Z \//cl I §b \ % c 2 _ ± w \ $ 5 G 2 »ff< =e LL 6 z \\§/ \/ \ Z O mac= 3:m < @ <� 0cr 5 Z �b E b LLL -jE LL � z_jLU / CL /� Z LL z � 0� �k �� _ �k + -Oza Q m �G g± k a ® C) U) =op�� L _ M: LL » Lu \/\\0 k /LL Ir O ƒ 23u=/ /Lu\/% o / e� // c < loo L ƒ e w _ ) LL (0 CO / w / \ z I CO w I < w \ t / i \ ƒ / < \ \ z z i 3 \ 2 0 ƒ 2 / C\l w w w @ ƒ QD 7 e f ƒ G E o C) k 3 » \ i a -1 / I Iƒ Z < I o e % c 2 _ ± w \ $ 5 G 2 Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 Office (425) 333-4535 Fax (425) 333-4509 July 8, 2019 Steve Jurgens Sjurgens22@gmail.com SUBJECT: Wetland and Stream Review for Jurgens Property 2301 Jones Ave. NE, Parcel 334450-0210 Renton, WA Dear Steve: Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture AOA -5910 On May 21, 2019 1 conducted a wetland and stream reconnaissance on the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the May 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). The site is currently developed with your existing residence, gravel parking areas, and yard. Kennydale Creek flows from southeast to northwest through the yard in the northeast corner of the site. One wetland (Wetland A) was observed along the creek within a broad topographic swale immediately off-site to the north. The southern boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of your north property line was delineated with pink flagging numbered A-1 through A-6 during the site review. Wetland A and Kennydale Creek Wetland A consists of a Riverine Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) class wetland containing a forested plant community that included black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), red alder (Alnus rubra), Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), lady fern (Athyrium filix- femina), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum). Hydrologic support to the wetland appears to be from both groundwater seepage and overbank flooding. Wetland A was determined to meet the criteria for a Category I I wetland with 4 Habitat Points (Attachment A). Category II wetlands with 4 Habitat Points require a standard 100 -foot buffer and 15 -foot building setback per RMC 4-3-050.G.2. It is my understanding that Kennydale Creek is considered a Type Np stream and requires a standard 75 -foot buffer plus 15 -foot building setback. Steve Jurgens July 8, 2019 Page 2 Existing Wetland and Stream Functions and Values Wetlands, in general, provide many valuable ecological and social functions, including stormwater storage, water quality protection, groundwater recharge and discharge, and wildlife habitat. Wetland A has the capacity to provide many of these functions. Although limited, the wetland does provide some stormwater storage that helps reduce downstream flooding while also trapping sediments. The trapping of sediments and other pollutants within the wetland maintains water quality in downstream areas and aids in the prevention of fish habitat degradation by limiting silt accumulation within spawning areas. The wetland provides further benefit to fish and other wildlife by releasing water slowly during the dry summer months, thereby contributing to the base flow of the stream. In addition to its hydrologic functions, the wetland also provides biological functions. The wetland provides habitat for a variety of wildlife species typical of suburban habitats within the Puget Sound lowlands. Another important biologic function of the wetland is the transport of nutrients to downstream areas. Nutrients transported to downstream areas provide biological support for fish and other aquatic wildlife. The wetland does provide some limited cultural wetland functions as part of the overall open space corridor associated with Kennydale Creek. Proposed Project It is my understanding that you are proposing an addition to your single- family residence. Due to the location of the existing structure, the addition must be constructed within the buffer to the north of the house. The area of the proposed expansion currently consists entirely of existing gravel parking and no significant vegetation would be removed as part of your proposed project. The buffer area associated with your proposed expansion does not currently provide any functional benefit to the wetland and stream. It is also my understanding that as part of the project you are proposing to plant a variety of native tree and shrub species along the north property line and adjacent Kennydale Creek to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffers. These plantings would provide a physical and visual screen to the wetland and stream from the residence and would increase the habitat and protection functions of the buffer over current conditions. Since there should be no increase in pollution generating surfaces associated with the project, there are no anticipated hydrologic impacts to the wetland. Steve Jurgens July 8, 2019 Page 3 Recommendation Since it is not possible to develop the expansion outside of the standard or reduced buffers on the site, the project can only occur utilizing an alternate buffer that meets all of the criteria outlined in RMC 4-3-050.G.9.d.ii. These criteria include the preparation of a buffer enhancement planting plan that would demonstrate an increase in the functions of the buffer over current conditions. It is my recommendation that a meeting be held with the City of Renton Planning Department to determine whether an alternate buffer would likely be approved prior to the preparation of detailed site plans. If you have any questions, please call me at (425) 333-4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachments U I IA • ;� a 0 `¢y C) N wwa C) a� o LL U) rn oD w Lr) oo a a-' i �O o i a 0 ra O �• 4—J m � IA ro c O � M o o C) c +J N ce 0 a G c • ;� a 0 a c O u C) N v a� o LL U) C) Ln M oD Q oo ■ a-' i �O U N (n 0) i a U ra O �• 4—J m � L 5= -0 n m •�� U a� a 0 ro c O � M o o C) c +J N ce 0 a G c • ;� a m a c O u C) N v Ln o LL U) C) Ln M oD Q oo ■ CD Y � � w C) • ;� a m m Q C) N m m Q C) N Ln C) Ln M ro U Q ru Lo O U N n L 0 a-' i �O U N (n 0) i a QH -a fz +� N ra O �• s- m m � m o 5= -0 n m •�� Q a� a 0 w a 0 0 -6J 0 a 0 4-1 a 0 . cn Q a Q a Q a i2 a Q a 00 S2 a Wetland name or number A RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): 334450-0210 Date of site visit: 5/21/2019 Rated by Altmann Trained by Ecology?21 YesE] No Date of training 03/08 & 03/15 HGM Class used for rating Riverine & Fresh Water Tidal Wetland has multiple HGM classes? 21 Yes ❑ No NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map King County iMAP OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY II (based on functions o or special characteristics El ) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 X Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 - 19 Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Improving Hydrologic Habitat FUNCTION Bog Mature Forest Water Quality Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon List appropriate rating (H, M, L) Site Potential M H L Landscape Potential H H L Value H M M Total Score Based on 8 8 4 20 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9=H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3=L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A RIVERINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality R 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? R 1.1. Area of surface depressions within the Riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a 1 flooding event: 1 Depressions cover > 3/4 area of wetland points = 8 2 Depressions cover >'/2 area of wetland points = 4 Depressions present but cover <'/2 area of wetland points = 2 1 No depressions present points = 0 R 1.2. Structure of plants in the wetland (areas with >90% cover at person height, not Cowardin 2 classes) 0 Trees or shrubs > 2/3 area of the wetland points = 8 ° Trees or shrubs >'/3 area of the wetland points = 6 8 ° Herbaceous plants (> 6 in high) > 2/3 area of the wetland points = 6 Herbaceous plants (> 6 in high) >'/3 area of the wetland points = 3 Trees, shrubs, and ungrazed herbaceous <'/3 area of the wetland points = 0 Total for R 1 Add the points in the boxes abovel 10 Rating of Site Potential If score is: El 12 -16 = H o 6 - 11 = M ° 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page R 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? R2.1. Is the wetland within an incorporated city or within its UGA? Yes = 2 No = 0 2 R 2.2. Does the contributing basin to the wetland include a UGA or 1 incorporated area? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 R 2.3. Does at least 10% of the contributing basin contain tilled fields, 0 pastures, or forests that have been clearcut within the last 5 years? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 2.4. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that 1 generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 2.5. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are 2 not listed in questions R 2.1 - R 2.4? 0 Other Sources Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for R 2 Add the points in the boxes above 4 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 0 3 - 6 = H ° 1 or 2 = M ° 0 = L Record the rating on the first page R 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? R 3.1. Is the wetland along a stream or river that is on the 303(d) list or on a 1 tributary that drains to one within 1 mi? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 3.2. Is the wetland along a stream or river that has TMDL limits for nutrients, 1 toxics, or pathogens? Yes = 1 No = 0 R 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the drainage in 0 which the unit is found) Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for R 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is: 0 2 - 4 = H ° 1 = M ° 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 5 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A RIVERINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion R 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? R 4.1. Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel (distance between banks). Calculate the ratio: (average width of 1 wetland)/(average width of stream between banks). If the ratio is more than 20 points = 9 6 If the ratio is 10 - 20 points = 6 If the ratio is 5 - < 10 points = 4 0 If the ratio is 1 - < 5 points = 2 If the ratio is < 1 points = 1 1 R 4.2. Characteristics of plants that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris as forest or shrub. Choose the points appropriate for the best description (polygons need to have >90% cover at person height. These are NOT Cowardin classes). Forest or shrub for >'/3 area OR emergent plants > 2/3 area points = 7 7 Forest or shrub for >'/10 area OR emergent plants >'/3 area points = 4 Plants do not meet above criteria points = 0 Total for R 4 Add the points in the boxes abovel 13 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 0 12 -16 = H El 6 - 11 = M El 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page R 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? R 5.1. Is the stream or river adjacent to the wetland downcut? Yes = 0 No = 1 1 R 5.2. Does the up -gradient watershed include a UGA or incorporated area? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 R 5.3 Is the up -gradient stream or river controlled by dams? Yes = 0 No = 1 1 Total for R 5 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 0 3 = H L1 1 or 2 = M 01 0 = L Record the rating on the first page R 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? R 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems? Choose the description that best fits the site. The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of the wetland has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural 1 resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 R 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood 0 conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for R 6 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Value If score is: El 2- 4= H o 1= M El 0= L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 6 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 1 o Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points - 1 o Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: Q The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or'/4 ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 2 o Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 ID Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 o Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland El Lake Fringe wetland 2 points o Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle 1 If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. o a 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 vvetlano name or numoer A H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. o Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) o Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) 2 ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least'/ ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) ❑ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes abovel 6 Rating of Site Potential If Score is: ❑ 15 - 18 = H ❑ 7 -14 = M o 0 - 6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: 0 % undisturbed habitat + ( 0.03 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 0.015% If total accessible habitat is: 0 >'/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: 12.8 % undisturbed habitat + ( 15.1 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 20.35% watershed plan 2 Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) -2 <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: ❑ 4 - 6 = H ❑ 1 - 3 = M o < 1 = L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species 1 ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ❑ It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If Score is: ❑ 2 = H o 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Wetlani9 Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 8 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/phs/list/ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. 0 Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). o Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). E] Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ° Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 — see web link above). ID Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 — see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. E] Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 �= O _ NO O, u G .b E 0 LU o .--I Z Ln N Q)O O Q Ol� p 6 L Ln ro � � M O � M O O CD c >1 +� N c U a O D Ol cn C O O Q o U ro V) +� ro U N ro 4-J 4-+ ro' ru O Q Y Q Z M O O 41 2 F) = o 00 4O+ _ ro O I v 0 N V > Q)' ro u 4J E41M.—A O O O M O O O N O O O O O LO C7 0 Ln � o ro O 2 M C ate-+ 4 C ro roro V) N C O 4-J J 2 r LL t ' v 01,4 CO o ao N O NX �k ti \\\ : co 0 A M, Ln 7) • 0) _rte _ j�� �' (n -- _ fa U w.MRfro QO T f0 O O �' O O LU O d N O O Lr)r e Q O N a V) C=G = �" "1 1 -'+ -.^."• f . -. e _ "•l 4-j X O O M man 0 4-1 O O U fl O ` n = 0 O a+N�Ud ®1 ` N m CD = '0 M M '0 M M C6 2i, U m Q Ln It It It N 1-1 ' U Ln It m Q It It N 1-1 N cn O O O O O O O O O O O O L N N N N a.a.a.a. U U U U N N a.a. U U aN aN 0 U U aN aN U U aN U aN U a ti '2 1♦ I d N �4j LL a ti '2 �U L U J2Y 1 I W z z 3N any uo1Aeq -Irl ;,,:,: - ;1 j1 m � C Y Qr� 3N aAduosJall a!- °'2d eX Ave NE o J TIIJeH r Z` N C J m z 1 IN JA. uaapJaW U U L � � L N N W W z N any Atiope%oi L co N Q, z in C5 N aAy Ved = z (J'i L Vi CL L1 E—L Vl (h z N OND f` �'S z z z z z N M 2 M `) M cZ 7 ry N aAy 11auing I JlJA'' a^V ma1A-UII2V-p�',l 3N aAV GRIO«,n3 %,p I'. •,C1 H9h Ave NE_T�._ lhJ =''t1 �lel8 �n w z IN a.,y AaJa1L, 3N aAy �01V.auUa)� i l i i n law� N Q — � . i 8/25/2018 TMDL Project Information for WRIA 8 1 WA State Department of Ecology lhftp://www.ecy.wa.gov:80/programs/wq/tmd[fTMDLsbyWria/tmdl-wriaO8.html F—Go-1 NOV MAi, OCT Q 0 15 captures i 30 ♦ E 26 Jul 2009 - 24 Oct 2017 2015 1017 2018 W - >� DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY State of Washington Home Water Quality & Supply Figure D Waste & Toxics Water Quality Improvement > Water Quality Improvement Projects by WRIA > WRIA 8: Cedar-Sammamish WRIA 8: Cedar-Sammamish The following table lists overview information for water quality improvement projects (including total maximum daily loads, or TMDLs) for this water resource inventory area (WRIA). Please use links (where available) for more information on a project. Counties • King, Snohomish Air & Climate Waterbody Name Pollutants Status** TMDL Lead Ballinger Lake Total Phosphorus Approved by EPA Tricia Shoblom 425-649-7288 Bear -Evans Creek Basin Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Dissolved Oxygen Approved by EPA Temperature Cottage Lake Total Phosphorus Approved by EPA Tricia Shoblom Has an implementation 425-649-7288 plan Issaquah Creek Basin Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Little Bear Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Moh EKdL9k Tributaries: 425-649-7036 Trout Stream Great Dane Creek Cutthroat Creek North Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA 1WW SvrjQ1 Has an implementation 425-649-7036 plan Pipers Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Joan Nolan 425-649-4425 Sammamish River Dissolved Oxygen Field work starts summer Ralph Svrjcek Temperature 2015 425-649-7036 Swamp Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Ralph SvrjLek Has an implementation 425-649-7036 plan * * Status will be listed as one of the following: Approved by EPA, Under Development or Implementation For more information about WRIA 8: • Waterbodies in WRIA 8 - using the Water Quality Assessment Query Tool Watershed Information for WRIA 8 * The Department of Ecology and other state resource agencies frequently use a system of 62 "Water Resource Inventory Areas" or "WRIAs" to refer to the state's major watershed basins. About us I Contact us http://web.archive.org/web/20170330212555/http:/Www.ecy.wa.gov:801programs/wq/tmdlITMDLsbyWria/tmdl-wriaO8.html 1/2 W O .--i Z LOn N N O O CID Q m o LnLn 1 O M O M rn C 0 0 w 1-4 oc >1 N de U d •' r � n yy♦y♦e♦iyy •• • r ! e > ♦ ♦ ! �!!♦yidyy♦y!t♦y>!!y♦y!y>iiylt�y♦�1�♦� y♦y♦y♦ • � ♦el:y i'i!iiiile♦-♦o: � �'ie:' s♦c°:al�l�♦�!�! iyiyi/i i � � v •♦!♦♦♦♦t►!!♦.♦♦!!♦O!!♦♦i♦♦♦♦i♦4•'r!i �'>'s�Sac� �tJili♦epi . � w!� . iii:♦ • EO♦mow♦♦>♦♦♦>♦!!♦♦♦�.�♦t'•'!♦A♦♦wE 91>�>E � 1 � i®♦J49.!♦�!!♦♦♦y♦!♦♦♦!♦♦i♦♦!� iti►�►i� !!♦moi O♦♦AJaAalllJNlA�Oi i� 4 tsi !>!!♦y♦y!♦i!? ��Nr►�♦i♦y♦yNNA .Jlbt'Ag•►=+La�y♦y1�Q!♦,=� byeyly !iv :` i iii!!♦Ot'�♦!♦Ci!!J•�L�w♦1i�9♦!•iA♦N♦ �!!♦!♦♦♦♦ �►♦♦♦ °isi�: !>d�i' � = a s°i i��!%�iM�!�:�yly�y� �♦�y� 3♦y♦ �yY�♦yYy♦yt:♦+IyJJ�i�y�y♦y►;>�y>y♦�♦y♦yP �y1y♦ `�♦�i � �i>♦!♦!!♦!!`�i�� i G�1♦♦♦i♦!�♦tai►♦♦!♦�lt�!!♦ ��i4>'��♦!♦♦>!1'y♦♦♦♦♦ice >♦♦!!♦♦♦!!t`•`>!�?>!>w♦h!♦♦♦♦ ♦y♦y♦i!9! �� y3y♦y♦iN !'►♦ ♦♦y♦y!�•e♦�1�t�♦psi ♦�!,♦,t: !i!i♦i!i♦i��! ! !♦i/i�lli�� r, "> � `, � y®ti! !!i♦iiia. i ! !�%>♦!♦♦`�♦�! i-4!♦>� ! 4 Oma! ♦♦!i♦♦♦� ♦!♦♦♦A!!!I ♦♦♦.4ywl r ♦♦♦♦♦1 ♦!>�i'i i �iylyiyly.,,.ylyiyli� z�e�p>�i♦yeyaysy. ♦♦y�►>N�>y♦ u II �yy^y��-y> j♦ jiyiy!►i j♦ jt;� yii4�R.p'9! `!>4j'►y♦ III •i►' :�i ;�:' �� is .......... s.°3i>i♦ Vii''. ig - t _- ti.. zs, zQ N Cu LL. o� 0 'Il'N TC-) O O OI O N O O CD O O C'7 C) O � bCla� w•C U .�+ ■--1 r� a b C �y U waa `¢y s a w Ln O OO O S -•I o OO OCIS 3 Ln :D m° O LU Mfo 0) M M W O .--i Z LOn N N O O CID Q m o LnLn 1 O M O M rn C 0 0 w 1-4 oc >1 N de U d •' r � n yy♦y♦e♦iyy •• • r ! e > ♦ ♦ ! �!!♦yidyy♦y!t♦y>!!y♦y!y>iiylt�y♦�1�♦� y♦y♦y♦ • � ♦el:y i'i!iiiile♦-♦o: � �'ie:' s♦c°:al�l�♦�!�! iyiyi/i i � � v •♦!♦♦♦♦t►!!♦.♦♦!!♦O!!♦♦i♦♦♦♦i♦4•'r!i �'>'s�Sac� �tJili♦epi . � w!� . iii:♦ • EO♦mow♦♦>♦♦♦>♦!!♦♦♦�.�♦t'•'!♦A♦♦wE 91>�>E � 1 � i®♦J49.!♦�!!♦♦♦y♦!♦♦♦!♦♦i♦♦!� iti►�►i� !!♦moi O♦♦AJaAalllJNlA�Oi i� 4 tsi !>!!♦y♦y!♦i!? ��Nr►�♦i♦y♦yNNA .Jlbt'Ag•►=+La�y♦y1�Q!♦,=� byeyly !iv :` i iii!!♦Ot'�♦!♦Ci!!J•�L�w♦1i�9♦!•iA♦N♦ �!!♦!♦♦♦♦ �►♦♦♦ °isi�: !>d�i' � = a s°i i��!%�iM�!�:�yly�y� �♦�y� 3♦y♦ �yY�♦yYy♦yt:♦+IyJJ�i�y�y♦y►;>�y>y♦�♦y♦yP �y1y♦ `�♦�i � �i>♦!♦!!♦!!`�i�� i G�1♦♦♦i♦!�♦tai►♦♦!♦�lt�!!♦ ��i4>'��♦!♦♦>!1'y♦♦♦♦♦ice >♦♦!!♦♦♦!!t`•`>!�?>!>w♦h!♦♦♦♦ ♦y♦y♦i!9! �� y3y♦y♦iN !'►♦ ♦♦y♦y!�•e♦�1�t�♦psi ♦�!,♦,t: !i!i♦i!i♦i��! ! !♦i/i�lli�� r, "> � `, � y®ti! !!i♦iiia. i ! !�%>♦!♦♦`�♦�! i-4!♦>� ! 4 Oma! ♦♦!i♦♦♦� ♦!♦♦♦A!!!I ♦♦♦.4ywl r ♦♦♦♦♦1 ♦!>�i'i i �iylyiyly.,,.ylyiyli� z�e�p>�i♦yeyaysy. ♦♦y�►>N�>y♦ u II �yy^y��-y> j♦ jiyiy!►i j♦ jt;� yii4�R.p'9! `!>4j'►y♦ III •i►' :�i ;�:' �� is .......... s.°3i>i♦ Vii''. ig - t _- ti.. zs, zQ N Cu LL. o� 0 'Il'N TC-) O O OI O N O O CD O O C'7 C) ■--1 N O +' OO Ln :D C Mfo M 4-jfa m M � CT • C Q L - t= fu O J a' O .27 f1300 U O 4-J ro C:ry a E 5 E U N O U 0- H H E- n Q Y Q 00 ( cn E co in M co -0 ] ) \ k §, E @ ) ] m p = o ow E f \ 9 : I ) \ \ \ / ƒ @) § a . © ( \ $ j r - -_ \ m, co) f { k \ § R ) / \ \) % § ] } \ ) & § - k \ \ a k ° ] @ ^ & $ ! \ / 2)) o o J J \) I # e \ $ $ $) f e ((( ] ] | { Co { \ § } \ | | | / / ) ) ƒ ■ | } o | | y y e ■ § co = o i o m o - z CR + e i o||| S D@ 0 e o| S q| � � 7� � � ip � � § _±} z c_= o f@} $ 0 § // s E// - )� ° L Co o %Ey CO -n C, � §cc / //) z /] CO )k \ {ƒ m #� e �R w \� §E ca§ CLE Cn L2 :E @ � 2 & ) , R k / � LO # � f ] C:) � } / _ R CO ea �i �V.�gd •'ac'A` ..ar r, 7rl��lti' f'�^��!'s"o AYk� a ow E Am Al i .I - I ,, U r V. •-N- . �Cm AIM Ap 3w , . fta .o r� Q `.. j w J 21 CII J U 0i w �-F- U Z cam— _O a� ° �° p .. c .� Q vn >, 0 m �E N Q CL `o �' z F . + co T w .. E o O LL Q 0 1 - E LuLu W E o U m N i r 0 0O O a H O CL CL O :5 M Z M O f6 (n M U U N � T O ((E H O 10- c: O p O M N O e- U co Q U O M m N �t t M o - CU W M M E "" co Z yO L H ` .. Q N N - '^ N ^,v / M ON . N O O O > O � � c� CV o �(D o� o CL U c Q r _ o o � N LO c � o r N `� aci N A N � � r CL ' r J N L > W b._ LO O rto M W Q N -� N i p o 0 O M � M M M r M � N I O U O, �� L L X y U 260 ; N + �� p UI M C-4 O M M M M M � J = m a, c J Y � (0 w O U U � N O � c c vi L � vi m E� _ o � c "a i C Y U _T _T s c � •�+ Q d N N (n d d� W Vl � J 1.1 Z N .o r� Q `.. j w J 21 CII J U 0i w �-F- U Z cam— _O a� ° �° p .. c .� Q vn >, 0 m �E N Q CL `o �' z F . + co T w .. E o O LL Q 0 1 - E LuLu W E o U m N i r 0 0O O a H O CL CL O :5 M Z M O f6 (n M U U N � T O ((E H O 10- c: O p O M N O e- U co Q U O M m N �t t M o - CU W M M E "" co Z yO L H ` .. Q N N - '^ N ^,v / M ON . N O O O > O � � c� CV o �(D o� o CL U c Q r _ o o � N LO c � o r N `� aci N A N � � r CL ' r J N L > W b._ LO O rto M W Q N -� N i p o 0 O M � M M M r M � N I O U O, �� L L X y U 260 ; N + �� p UI M C-4 O M M M M M