Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Renton Trails Master Plan (9/1990) ,-- , tal ---- I I I ...... CITY OF RENTO6 TRAILS _ ' \A ,-.___,,,s----------' N\ I MASTER L 1j"h,/ PIAN i I 0 lt\ fl ilk, 6 ` 0._ , .. 6 ‘/- 4:_i ,_1641,4 1 I i ,.."''.‘. fr>`,4 1,' .apir 4 W. ' III p.�L IIII .:: L ., ma's a /'� . . Mc, i irsw ,.... , 1? a ....! VIII-11(' •. owe' -46A 0 \ 7 ....................... .............‘......................4 it it; A-. i 14 1 ( / 1 0.1 -0 ds., lw' etv, ti,,, A ,4; IF , • ...A.%:\ At 4,,,,-, , ..t. :A ...I., , i:j. .,....,.:4‘.: .i. iffiry 1.• --in,_‘ „09,44\ .,....:.A.., iitie; A\,_ no ,. . :.,,,, _ ,.. ,.., .......5,,,, T1\46.-,. ,, . 4;V*1,--- I&.. ..- .at. -. :. .. r t f.,.. v - vdtriiii7f,17'.. v-•=. '--v-ii..142\iremi. p tip a,... MI " 1.61"'. .. . • .. ._.,_(. il 67::.,,,,.......-tk i , .. via4k7,.... Ant\t_410%- AW..____:. 1 ► • 4o, CITY OF RENTON TRAILS MASTER PLAN SEPTEMBER 1990 Community Services Sam Chastain, Administrator City Wide Master Plan CITY OF RENTON MAYOR Earl H. Clymer CITY COUNCIL Bob Edwards Nancy Mathews Toni Nelson Dick Stredicke Jesse Tanner Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Tim Schlitzer COMMUNITY SERVICES Sam Chastain, Administrator PARKS AND RECREATION William Hutsinpiller, Recreation Services Manager James Shepherd, Facilities Services Manager RENTON PARK BOARD Ron Regis, Chair Robert Larsen Robert Logue Joan Moffatt Ronald Regis MASTER TRAILS(CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Laura Baggett Terry Lewis Jim Bressani Kathy McBeth John Cook Francis Pieper Peggy DuBois Randy Rockhill Al Folmer Esther Schaff Darrell Igelmund Tim Seering Dennis Lensegrav Paul Wantezelius TABLE OF CONTENTS a J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Area Goals and Objectives The Trail Planning Process Proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail Systems Plan for Action:Implementation INTRODUCTION The Role of trails Trails and Open Space Preservation Go Hand in Hand The Development of a Comprehensive Plan GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES TRAIL CORRIDORS Introduction Inventory Analysis Trail Corridor Identification Northeast Corridors Southeast Corridors Southwest Corridors--The Valley Northwest Corridors TRAIL STANDARDS Urban/Suburban/Natural Environment User Groups Design Criteria PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM Major Trails Minor Trails PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES Major Trails Minor Trails PLAN FOR ACTION:IMPLEMENTATION Establishing Priorities Trail Easements and Right-Of-Way Acquisition Funding Sources Construction Costs and Standards Citizen Involvement Programming Trail Development City Wide Master Trails Plan APPENDICES '. Appendix A-Public Involvement Appendix B-Attractions and Nodes Map Appendix C-Major Vehicular Infrastructure Appendix D- Trails Standards Appendix E-Glossary Appendix F-Expanded Environmental Checklist • CalmilimmilmilimillimmilliNNEX.ECUTIVE SUMMARY J The Renton Trails Master Plan has been developed in motorized transportation needs into a comprehensive tandem with the Renton Parks and Recreation Department trail system,which would serve local and regional users. 1990-1994 Comprehensive Plan.This is a natural association considering the role that walking,running/jogging,hiking, 2. To increase opportunities for public involvement in the and cycling play in recreation. The need for a c+prehen- trails planning process. sive trail system was determined by citizen surveys and physical observation.The plan will provide the guidance for 3. To promote participation and cooperation of public and developing a city-wide trails system that will satisfy both private sectors in the trail systems development recreational and functional non-motorized transportation needs. 4. To conserve, enhance, and improve recreational and cultural opportunities for the public. PLANNING AREA 5. To enhance and improve the circulation system to,from, and within the city. The planning area for the Trails Master Plan includes all 6. To maximize public access to open space areas,in par areas which lie within the Renton city limits,areas of poten- tial annexation such as North Soos Creek,and portions of titular greenbelts,stream corridors,the lake shore,and adjacent jurisdictions that contribute to the regional focus wetlands. of the plan. Consequently,the Trails Master Plan considers connections between Renton and: Seattle,Mercer Island, Bellevue,Issaquah,May Valley,Maple Valley,Dent,Tukwila, THE TRAIL PLANNING PROCESS North Soos Creek,and other sections of uninincorporated King County. Following an inventory and analysis phase,corridors,which should contain trails, were identified within the Greater Special attention was given to serving Renton's fifteen Renton area. These corridors are not specific trail routes identified neighborhoods (see description and map in the but instead,the general areas where linkages between neigh- 1990 Comprehensive Park&Recreation Plan.),as well as borhoods and activity centers should be made in order to the major employment centers located in North Renton and form a coherent bicycle and pedestrian trail system. The Green River Valley. Trail Corridor Criteria GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Trails corridors were established based on their potential to meet the following criteria: The major goal of the City Wide Trails Plan is to improve the 1. make regional connections. quality of urban life in Renton in terms of: • personal and environmental health 2. make sub-regional or local connections. • recreation and leisure • open space accessibility 3. function as a collector of minor and local access corri- • land stewardship dors. • sense of community 4. function as a gateway to the city. This goal shall be achieved through the following objectives: 5. to offer natural amenities. 1. To integrate Renton's recreational and functional non- City Wide Master pails Plan 6. to have an average slope of the corridor conducive to trail Together, all of these trails will combine to form a very development,preferably less than 5%. effective system which maximizes safety, experience, and functionality. Trail Corridors Nine corridors were indentified,organized by compass di- PLAN FOR ACTION-- rection. They are as follows: IMPLEMENTATION Northeast Corridors East Shore Lake Washington No matter,how well conceived a master plan may be, it is May Creek/Honey Creek only a concept until steps are taken to implement the plan. Implementation of a master plan converts what are essen- East Corridor tially ideas into reality. Many issues must be considered in Renton-Issaquah this conversion process. Southeast Corridors Reflecting this complexity, the strategy utilized for the Cedar River implementation of the City of Renton Trails Master Plan is Seattle and Mercer Island Waterlines based on the coordination of the six following elements: Southwest Corridors 1. Establishing priorities Orillia-Petrovitsky 2. Right-of-way acquisition The Green River Valley 3. Funding sources 4. Construction costs West Corridor 5. Programming trail development Black River 6. Citizen involvement Northwest Corridors West Shore Lake Washington PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAIL SYSTEMS The proposed trail systems have been divided up into major and minor trails, depending upon the extent of the trail, regional value,and multiple use potential. • Major trails,larger in extent and usually of a greater regional value form the backbone of the system. • Minor trails,while smaller in extent are no less im- portant however, and form the connective tissue - that binds the plan and ensures diversity of environ- ment and use. twenty--four pedestrian trails have been proposed,the majority along separated right-of-way. Twenty-eight bicycle routes have been identified,the majority of which share the street right-of-way,to better serve commuter needs and to be able - to facilitate building the greatest amount of trails for the least amount of money. These trails include five mixed use a - trails, which will be built along separated right-of-way. cR INTRODUCTION The City of Renton has long prided itself on its excellent park be able to change direction and stop without warning, However, facilities and recreation programs. Park sites are numerous, this type of behavior can have dangerous consequences when equitably distributed throughout the city and beautifully in the path of faster moving cyclists. Consequently,the plan maintained.Nevertheless,the city is still deficient in its share discourages the uses of sidewalks for bicycles. Pedestrians of bicycle,pedestrian,and equestrian trails. Surveys taken and bicyclists will utilize separate trails,except for instances for the 1984 Comprehensive Park&Recreation Plan and its where there is sufficient right-of-way to combine them. subsequent 1990 update, have indicated that the develop- ment of trails is the number one recreation desire of the Increased diversity in recreational interests have fostered a Renton citizenry.These indications reflect expanded recrea- new competition for open space resources between the en- tion needs and habits for urban dwellers of the Pacific tire non-motorized user group. As a result, competition --, Northwest at large,and Rentonites in particular. Therefore, between pedestrians and cyclists is becoming as intense as it it is incumbent upon the City to address the changes in is between motorized and non-motorized transportation recreational needs and trends by providing alternatives to users. While pedestrians,bicyclists,and all-terrain cyclists traditional park facilities and recreation programs. The all share the spirit of non-motorized recreation/transporta- Trails Master Plan takes a bold step in addressing these tion,they do not always wish to share the limited resource of needs, space. A comprehensive trails plan fulfills an important role be- yond its value as a recreation plan,as it serves as a means of addressing the City's transportation ncprls.Renton's present THE ROLE OF TRAILS transportation system is geared almost exclusively towards motorized transportation. The dominance of the automo- Despite inadequate provisions,walking, hiking, running, bile belies the fact that non-motorized travel is an integral and bicycling still form a basis for the city's recreation system. component of Renton's overall transportation system Despite Fitness conscious Americans have been running and jogging the lack of safe provisions within this system,on a wily basis in increasing numbers over the past decade. Where walking residents,employees, and visitors of Renton walk,bicycle, was once considered only a functional aspect of our daily and even horseback,throughout the city. Because of the lack regiment, or an exercise strictly for the elderly,it has now of safe facilities,they often put themselves in great danger gained new status as an extremely popular form of recreation while trying to navigate through a system,designed primarily and competition. Walkers are realizing both the physical for motorized transportation. Though pedestrians and cy- and mental health benefits which can be derived from the clists exist in Renton from every age group and ability level, combined cardiovascular conditioning and stress reduction. the prevailing transportation infrastructure lacks adequate facilities to provide for these growing user groups. It is the The mild climate of the Pacific Northwest makes this an ideal intent of this Trails Master Plan to respond to this need by region to enjoy walking and hiking. Walking has become creating a combined transportaion and recreation system recognized as an international sport,referred to as "volks- that is more functionally integrated. i marching" and "power walking." Washington State, with over 60 volksmarching clubs,boasts the largest number in Although the City has striven to create a non-motorized the nation. The City of Renton presently has two volks- transportation system which is functionally integrated,it has marching clubs plus many informal walking groups. The been necessary to separate the various user groups,in order local popularity of walking has been well demonstrated at to minimize conflicts. Just as fast moving cars may be the annual Renton River Days Volksmarch where 800-1200 incompatible with slower moving bicycles, fast moving bi- walkers participate each year. These numbers clearly dem- cycles are not compatible with slower moving pedestrians. onstrate the need for more trails. This situation is compounded by the fact that pedestrian movement is highly unpredictable. It is the perogative of Bicycling has also experienced enormous increases in popu- pedestrians not to have to maintain constant speeds,and to larity. Ironically,advances in technology have helped foster 3 City Wide Master Trails Plan the development of this"low-tech"form of transportation People want trails for recreation and-transportation, but and recreation. Lighter,faster bicycles with 10-21 gears have they prefer them in more natural surroundings. Jogging reduced the challenges imposed by topography and distance. along a road filled with automobile traffic and exhaust fumes While sleek racing bikes have gotten many sports enthusiasts compromises the healthful experience and is hardly as enjoy- out on to the streets,the more recent development of moun- able as running through a greenbelt. Similarly,cycling along tain or all-terrain bicycles have enabled thousands of people a highway where cars and trucks are speeding by and honking to travel off of the roads,into the back country,providing their horns as they pass,detracts from the positive cycling access into the last remaining pockets of undeveloped land. experience. As of 1988,over 14,000 all-terrain bicycles had been sold in the state,with the numbers increasing greatly each year. The Fortunately,Renton is rich in opportunities to provide an explosive popularity of mountain bikes (90% of all new extensive bicycle and pedestrian trail system.The Trails Plan bicycle sales) has presented a new challenge to recreation is comprehensive,both geographically and experientially. It planners in accommodating yet another user group.. The takes advantage of Renton's exceptional physical resources needs of all-terrain cyclists are often different from those of and lower concentrations of development to create a system commuter cyclists,whose needs are in turn,different from which passes through urban,suburban,industrial,and natu- those of recreational road cyclists and competitors. ral environments. Within these zones are a rich diversity of forested greenbelts,open meadows,stream corridors,lake There is a great inequity between the number of people who shore,and wetlands. In addition to the amenities offered by use bicycles and the amount of existing bike trails which have each trail,a conscientious effort was made to connect all the been allocated. A study conducted in 1988 by the Washing- parks and greenbelts within the city of Renton through the ton State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation framework of the trail system. Trail variety is also offered (IAC) revealed statistics which advocate a strong need for through trail loops of varying lengths. additional bike trails. Of over 3,575 miles of bike routes managed by City,County,State,and Federal jurisdictions in While it is essential that Renton's trail system serve local the state of Washington,only 672 miles of bike routes have neighborhoods,attractions and employment centers,it must been provided by the combined cities and districts.,Of these, also make regional connections as well. People do not Renton presently has only about two miles of bike trails. Of necessarily live,work and recreate in the same town. They the 1,740,000 households interviewed in the state survey, need to be able to navigate freely between adjoining jurisdic- 50%or 870,000 people bicycle on roads with an additional Lions. Consequently,development of the Trails Master Plan 14% or 243,824, who bicycle off-road. Renton's random has tried to incorporate interconnections and regional cope- household survey ranked bicycling as ninth out of 52 activi- siveness. ties overall and fourth out of ten among teenagers. These numbers indicate a need for improved bicycle facilities. TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE According to the State survey, pedestrians, have acres to PRESERVATION GO HAND IN HAND about 9,129 miles of trails throughout the state. However, . only 249 miles or 2.6%of the trails lie within urban settings, with an additional 104 miles or 1.1%in the unincorporated Trails not only provide access into more natural environ- counties. To date, 5.2 miles of trail have been built in ments,but help to preserve this rapidlydiminishing--and Renton. These figures stand in contrast to the fact that the non-renewable--resource. Increased residential and com- largest population centers live and work in the cities,not the mercial development pressures have resulted in the removal National Forests,where about 80%or 7,187 miles of trails of significant portions of open space,specifically greenbelts, exist. Furthermore, Renton's citizens have indicated that stream corridors, shorelines,and wetlands. This develop- nature and pleasure walking is the top preferred recreation ment has occurred in areas where it was once taken for activity and consequently, walking and hiking trails are granted that they would never be built upon due to their considered the most critical recreation facility still to be steep slopes,unstable soils,and high water tables. provided. The conversion of greenbelts into houses,condominiums, In addition to the convenience of being able to recreate and offices have sent out panic waves among local citizenry. locally,from an environmental standpoint,people should be The current emphasis on open space preservation does not able.to enjoy nature without having to drive in their cars to reflect a new appreciation for nature,but is a reaction to a do so. Furthermore,depending upon motorized transporta- loss of natural environment --both for humans and wildlife. lion to access non-motorized trails compromises the inher- Those pockets of undeveloped land have traditionally pro- ent spontaneity of a local trail system. vided neighborhoods with informal trail systems. In fact, 1 City Wide Master Trails Plan many of the trails proposed in this plan were selected by safe provisions. The citizens committee and staff then checked observing where foot trails were already beaten through the best possible routes to travel between various attractions and landscape. If immediate action is not taken to preserve these nodes within the city last remaining parcels,this natural and recreational resource will be lost forever. Throughout the planning process there was constant coordi- nation between the citizen's committee and city staff. This However,all residential and commercial development should will be an ongoing process with a followup Trails Advisory not be viewed as at cross purposes with trail development. Council,which will meet once a month to maintain progress, Often development mitigation measures provide a large continuity,and address changing needs of trails plan that will source of funds for trail development. While it is important inevitably occur since its original development. for the City to try to acquire and protect the last iemaining parcels of open shoreline and sensitive lands,it should work The plan has already gone through a preliminary public with developers on land suitable for development,to provide hearing in July of 1989,but because it is an addendum to the recreational amenities. Development can be a boon to Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan update,it can not recreation if carried out in a coordinated fashion; be put up for official adoption until the fall of 1990. Planners and developers, working in cooperation, not in opposition,form a synergy which could achieve results oth- erwise impossible. For example, mitigation against the Boeing company's current expansion has at last; provided access around most of the southern end of Lake Washington. An example of how commercial development can foster trail development is the construction of the first half mile of the 3.4 mile Springbrook Trail through the Green River Valley. Trail development has begun by virtue of an officei park built along the southern section of the trail corridor. Successive development through the Green River Valley will enable continued development of the trail northbound,to its inter- section with the Black River Trail. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN The comprehensive nature of this plan is largely attributable to the comprehensive manner through which it was devel- oped. The Trails Master Planning process was initiated with the creation of a Citizens Advisory Committee(CAC). This group represented a wide spectrum of users and included members of the Women's Hiking Group; Boeing Bicycle Club;commuters and recreational cyclists;Boeing Physical Fitness Association; the downtown business community; Puget Power, Renton Soroptomists; senior citizens; and representatives of the various neighborhood associations. The CAC also included people of a wide range of ages. • Further input was received from the City's planning and technical staff, landscape architectural consultants, trans- portation and recreation planners. The research and planning efforts were thorough and me- thodical.Extensive fieldwork was carried out in order to find where people wanted to go, the highest usage areas, and where people were already walking and cycling,regardless of • 1 i F, oBJECTSDPoLICIE OBJECTIVESS The Goals and Policies element of the City Wide Trails • safety Master Plan identifies the purposes and role of trails within • user diversity the City of Renton.It provides the criteria that will guide the • experiential diversity planning effort. 2. Provide for the trail needs of Renton residents;working GOALS AND OBJECTIVES population;and commuters,recognizing the diversity of needs of such groups as: The ultimate goal of the Plan is to improve the quality of • adults urban life in Renton in terms of: • children • • personal and environmental health seniors • recreation and leisure ! • workers • open space accessibility • recreationalist • land stewardship • physically impaired • sense of community 3. Recognize the diversity of transportation modes and trip This goal shall be achieved through the following objectives: purposes of the following four groups: 1. To integrate Renton's recreational and functional non- • pedestrians motorized transportation needs into a comprehensive • bicyclists trail system serving local and regional users • joggers/runners • equestrians(minor,considered only in outlying areas) 2. To increase opportunities for public involvement in the trails planning process. 4. Provide foot/bicycle separation wherever possible;how- 3. To conserve,enhance,and improve recreational and cul- ever,where conflict occurs foot traffic should be given tural opportunities for the public. preference. 4. To maximize public arrrAs to open space areas,in particu- 5. Provide adequate separation between non-motorized and lar greenbelts,stream corridors,the lake shore,and wet- motorized traffic to ensure safety. lands. 6. Put major emphasis on establishing a"macro"system of 5. To enhance and improve the circulation system to,from,and while identifying critical missing links in the exist- within the city. ing functional system. Major considerations include: 6. To promote participation and cooperation of public and • linkages with surrounding communities while rec- private sectors in the trail systems development ognizing Renton's regional role POLICIES • need to open up major regional corridors such as Cedar River,the Green River,and the Lake Wash- ! ington Loop. It shall be the policy of the City of Renton to: • need to connect: - 1. Develop non-motorized transportation in tandem with motorized transportation systems,recognizing'such needs —urban activities such as work,school, as: shopping,and services 6 City Wide Master Tails Plan • --major centers such as the Central Busi- 12.Appropriate mitigation measures will be taken to ad- ness District,the Civic Center,Boeing, dress impacts on the City's recreation and transporta- and PACCAR tion infrastructure.Contributions to the City's non-mo- --recreational opportunities such as parks torizaed circulation system will help alleviate such im- and open spaces pacts. 7. Address"micro"level trails and fill in gaps in existing trail 13.All City utility easements should be acquired as multi- patterns where appropriate. Major considerations in- purpose easements. Other public or quasi-public agen- elude: des should be encouraged to acquire multi-purpose easements as well. All existing utility easements should • need to improve safety be examined for trail potential. I _ • need to remove barriers,identify missing links and substandard trails The intent of this policy is to insure that where it is • need to provide better inter-connections within the appropriate,trails will be allowed to be developed on CBD,Civic Center,the Valley,and within neigh- utility right-of-ways without going through a separate borhoods negotiating process with property owners. It will also • need to improve pedestrian amenities in high use ensure that all existing easements that have trail poten- area tial will be identified. • cost effectiveness of making better use of existing systems 14.The development of the City's Trail System will be given high priority on existing undeveloped right-of-ways and 8. Establish a system of trails that are recognized and main- on right-of-ways that are acquired in the future. tained by the City as distinct from informal or private pathways. 15.The City Wide Master Trails Plan shall reflect the intent of the City's Park&Recreation Comprehensive Plan. This policy is intended to recognize the City's responsibil- ity for trails established under this plan. Popular usage alone does not constitute a "trail" for which the City assumes responsibility. r , 9. Seek cost-effectiveness and utilize a variety of implemen- tation measures including: • general revenues • gas tax • State and Federal grants • incorporation of privately funded trails in conjunc- tion - with new private developments 10.The adopted Trails Plan shall be coordinated with and be an integral component of the City's on-going transporta- tion planning. This policy will insure that non-motorized circulation needs are addressed in tandem with motorized circula- tion needs. 11.City policy shall ensure that all new development will analyze through the Environmental Review process for its impact on the City's recreation and transportation systems. 7 I \�, J ` I ice, : - ^, \ rr \/ i b a % 1: _ / 'f ,40-:.• .- , L,\, ) 1 4.1( i 1- , ., \,, 1t \ ;� \,.....„., / i /VI' 1 : ( 1 \ \-\ 1 ' iii : p ' ..•/t ` Ma Creek HTnry CrNk?. '•�� ` ! East Lake Washington "11%-%. '\\)11 it.,.:., I \ . . ,,/-.: ' ,,_\•,,,\11. . . ,-----...N,ixtra .. \ / ,,'-r,„ • ' R . , enton/1-y•• h. I West Lake Waahlnon "" ! ;v ' ► // ` [, 1111 OP•t \ ' LALly Ig, . I. rrifif -''.\--..-'•?, -''• 1 . .. \ s ' \ p,,,.-,,,.--,it-..-,,,N:,„„„.,_,..iiil......-'....._2,.._,_...,,,,,......,,•(,...,,WI 6. litIg*. '.: a 'If., .-1-rf:r4`...:,/Z.. Black River!'", -.•••••1; 1.1115 ri,, I\\*1 A::'7,--..--", - ';'' -...., •t-7- •,- iogi( "___„,„... 11 _wirIpPill. IIIIII ,\„,,,,ir lir i .'^•3♦. vv_Z-• r- .•�'•';4) if - 1 fij'4):j h ...,..-- ; +1 0 -,.- f'-s:•' ,� Seattle/ Island _ - fi Seattle/Mercer Water Pipelines lc, I . :;4 1,.:� ( �� `/ate^ ' tt • a The Vag ' Al South Renton P4 ,' t> `�`k j t`- ilk k*� \ /� - s4>Y Y xr \ limb � " - —�yp� �.r4a_A/_ .— t�- ;fir ;,' � A�;C!}e •,ow 'L oft S '}4 2=J�-'' �f. • ' ITQt I ti j � _� - �J \ ti _ 44 • L, . . ... i v; „y j �c - 1•.,�7.Y• i ;1K •.4 - .<.':nKD'• . T •.' - Fes. / ~I::.-, 0® lilt 'dill'II : II Porks/Greenbelts ME ® IIP NORTH 0 .25m1 .SOmI .75m1 1.00m1 TRAIL CORRIDORS EffigffillmliglimimmilmilliffmNilmTRAIL CORRIDORS This element of the Plan identifies corridors within the City PHYSICAL FEATURES —, which should contain trails. These corridors are not specific routes for trails,but rather the general areas where linkages Renton lies at the hub of a radial network of physical and between neighborhoods and activity centers should be made man-made features. The natural forms such as valleys and to form a coherent city-wide pedestrian and bicycle system. ridges,as well as the man-made utility and transportation right-of-ways converge at the southern tip of Lake Washing- The corridors were identified through a three phase process: ton. Some of these features,such as the severe slopes and the major arterials,constitute barriers to trail development. At THE INVENTORY PHASE gathered information relating the same time however, barriers such as arterials right-of- to past planning efforts, as well as natural and cultural ways and stream corridors can accommodate parallel trail features.This information was processed into a set of maps development. depicting water features, slopes, greentztts, del elopment patterns,utility and transportation right-of-ways. Likewise,some areas remain commercially and residentially undeveloped due to the limitations imposed by these physi- THE ANALYSIS PHASE brought into focus the opportu- cal features. Fortunately however,trail development is not nities and constraints that would influence the development as constrained by these limitations and can be incorporated of a non-motorized transportation system. Inventory infor- into development proposals in a variety of ways. mation was further synthesized into a map of Attractions and Nodes.(See Appendix B.) THE TRAIL CORRIDOR MAP used the analysis informa- RIGHT-OF-WAYS Lion to develop a coherent system for the study of specific trails routes. Renton's location at the southern end of lake Washington makes it a convergent point for major right-of-ways. Electric powerlines, gas pipeline,railroad,and water pipeline right- of-ways all provide trail corridor opportunities. Not all these INVENTORY: right-of-ways are necessarily feasible for use as trail corridors but rather,they provide a broad perspective of corridor pos- A series of working maps were utilized to pro ide infor- sibilities that will be analyzed to determine: mation on steep slopes, wetlands,,surface water, undevel- oped areas,utility right-of-ways, existing trails, and major • whether the right of way connects attractions and arterials. nodes. • whether it offers an aesthetic and convenient EXISTING AND PROPOSED TRAILS route. • whether the landowner or easement holder can or The City of Renton is located at the center of a regional will allow a trail to share the right-of-way. system of existing and proposed trails.Major routes include: The lake Washington Loop,the Cedar River Trail System, the Green River Trail,and the Interurban Trail..These and other routes were identified utilizing adopted planning documents of Renton and surrounding jurisdictions. The ATTRACTIONS AND NODES proposed trails do not necessarly reflect the current realistic intentions of the respective jurisdictions. The purpose of Mapped attractions and nodes include schools,institutions, this mapping is to identify existing trails,determine missing parks, recreation opportunities, commercial attractions, links,and propose new routes. employment centers,and other significant features. These a it City Wide Master Trails Plan - areas are alternatively origins and destinations for all of the • Renton Avenue S. - people who live and/or work in the city. Establishing the lo- • SR 167(Rainier Avenue) cations of these attractions and nodes will therefore influ- ence where trails should be located and how they can be The vehicles using this network all converge on Renton's interconnected. Civic Center and Central Business District (CBD). The existing transportation infrastructure is comprised of east- The major attractions or nodes within the city are:The Civic west one-way couplets and several two way streets. The Center;Downtown Central Business District;Renton Cen- north-south traffic uses several arterials: Rainier Avenue, ter and Renton Village; Cedar River Trail; Gene Coulon Logan Avenue,Main Avenue S.,Houser Way N.,Bronson Park; Boeing;'Valley Medical Center;and Renton Munici- • Way,Park Avenue N.,and Sunset Boulevard N.E. As docu- pal Airport. mented in the"Cedar River Strategy Report,"the street net- work, while able to move large volumes of traffic, is dis- Strip development and the predominance of the automobile jointed and confusing to motorists. has led to the creation of Linear Business Districts(LBDs). Renton's Linear Business Districts exist along Rainier Ave- In order to find solutions to this congestion of city streets,a nue,Sunset Boulevard,and Grady Way(Renton Village). study was performed in 1987 and a six year transportation — plan developed for the City of Renton.This plan is updated i 1 each year before being submitted to the State Highway Commission. The study recommended the following physi- GENERALIZED MOVEMENT PA 1"1'bRNS cal improvements: Movement patterns link neighborhoods to schools, work, • Develop several new arterial roads to relieve the shopping and recreation destinations. Vehicular, bicycle, congested Central Business District. and pedestrian flows indicate where people are moving. These movement patterns reveal insights regarding poten- • Extend S.192nd St.,S.196th St.,and S.200th St. tial corridors that might provide alternatives to established across the Green River Valley. This would be a routes.They many also define potential barriers to trail link- joint project between Renton, Kent, and King ages. County. Major Vehicular Traffic Flows • Construct a connection between S.W.27th and S. 168th St.,as well as extend S.W.27th to the West The major traffic volumes in the city of Renton occur on Valley Highway. This would be a joint project I-405,which carries over 108,000 vehicles on an average week between the cities of Renton and Tukwila. day,and SR 167,which carries approximately 90,000 vehicles daily based on 1989 statistics. I-405 and SR 167 also consti- • Construct a connection between Maple Valley tute physical barriers across which access is limited. Road and N.E.3rd St.at Edmonds Ave. In addition to the freeways,several arterials laid out in radial Pedestrian Movements fashion carry traffic through the City from the surrounding areas.(See Appendix C)Starting in the north and moving in Nearly all of the arterials in the center of Renton and many a clockwise direction they are: of the outlying arterials provide sidewalks for pedestrian movement,but they lack continuity and design consistency. • Lake Washington Boulevard Pedestrian movement can be divided into four categories: • SR 900(N.E.Park Dr.,Sunset Blvd.N.E., Renton-Issaquah Rd. • Students • N.E.3rd St.and N.E.4th Streets • Employment related pedestrians • SR 169(Maple Valley Highway) • Shoppers • Benson Road S. • Recreational walkersijoggers/runners • SR 515(Talbot Rd.,Benson Dr.) • East Valley Road Bicycle Movements • Lind Avenue S.W. • • S.W.Grady Way _ There are very few facilities for safe bicycle movement through- • SR 900(Sunset Boulevard W.) out the city of Renton. Bicyclists presently travel along • i City Wide Master Trails Plan ! existingstreet right-of-ways or utili7P.sidewalks when tray-g � � TRAIL CORRIDOR IDENTIFICATION elling along major arterials without safe provisions. How- ever, sidewalks as their name indicates, are d igned for j , walking and thus cannot safely accommodate the mixed Renton's CBD and civic center represent both a regional and speeds of pedestrians and cyclists. topographical hub.The various civic functions located there are all conveniently located within walking distance of one The four different bicycle user groups are: another.This hub contains: • Work/School Commuters • Municipal Offices • Cedar River Park Recreationalists • Police Department • Jones Park r • Fire Department • Carco Theater • Tourists -' • Athletic Competitors • Public Library • Henry Moses Pool • Community Center • Renton Multi- - • Liberty Park Service Center The movement patterns of each user group differs according to their activities and comfort level with automobile traffic. • Cedar River Trail Similarly, the organizational layout of the trail corridors • reflects this configuration. Although specific bicycle and ANALYSIS pedestrian routes are discussed separately, they are com- bined within the same corridors. 1 Information gained during the Inventory and Analysis Phases OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS was utilized to select major trail corridors where trails are desirable. Additionally, each corridor was rated using the A map of Opportunities and Constraints reveals That poten- following criteria: _ tial major corridors exisit along naural watercourses;utility and street right-of-ways; abandoned rail linesil and to a 1. Corridor's actual or potential capacity to make regional - limited extent, undeveloped parcels of land. Many of the connections connections through downtown and established neighbor- hoods can utilize or modify existing street right-of-ways to 2. Corridor's actual or potential capacity to make sub- provide missing links in the corridor system. . .. . regional connections,i.e. connections within the local Renton area Trail opportunities include those lands which are:. —undeveloped 3. Corridor's potential to function as a collector of minor - --existing right-of-ways and local access corridors --slopes of less than 10% . 4. Corridor's actual or potential capacity to function as a Trail constraints include those lands which are: gateway to the city --developed —slopes of greater than 10% 5. Corridor's level of natural amenities --are wetlands or water bodies �r 1 6. Average slope of corridor(5%or less preferred) Constraints typically occur in and around the do town,es- tablished residential neighborhoods,or along the steep peri- Based on this criteria,specific routes were later developed meter of the major hills surrounding the downtown. within the following corridors. - The arterials provide both an opportunity and a constraint. Where sufficient right-of-way exists, trail corridors can be j developed;although excessive traffic volumes can also have NORTHEAST CORRIDORS a negative impact on the trail's qualitative experience. The inclusion of a particular opportunity or constraint does EAST SHORE LAKE WASHINGTON ! not necessarily preclude selection as a trail corridor, but offers guidelines to aid the selection process. Regional Connections: Bellevue,Newport Shores,Renton /O City Wide Master Trails Plan Sub-regional Connections: Coal Creek Parkway,Newport, Average Slope:The valley side slopes of both May and Honey Factoria,May Creek,Kennydale, Gene Coulon Park,Boe- Creeks are steep. However, May Creek has a wider valley ing,North Renton,Renton Municipal Airport,Renton Civic floor than Honey Creek. it Center. Although the slopes of Honey Creek drop steeply down the Access to Corridor Collector: Coal Creek Parkway, I-90, the creek,there is a level utility road which parallels the creek N.E.44th,N.30th,N.E.Park Dr., Park Ave.N. south the the Devil's Elbow.Remnants of a residential road still exist north of the Elbow,up to the confluence with May Gateway Potential: From the northeast,Lake Washington Creek. Blvd. is the only non-freeway arterial into the city. This corridor has enormous potential to function as a gateway. The intersection of Lake Washington Blvd.with the pro- posed May Creek corridor could serve as an excellent gate- RENTON-ISSAQUAH way into the city. Level of Natural Amenities: The Fast Shore Lake Washing- Regional Connections: Renton,Unincorporated King County, ton corridor is rich in natural amenities. This is one of the Issaquah more scenic routes with views out to Lake Washington,the Olympic Mountains,Mt.Rainier,and Gene Coulon Beach Sub-regional Connections: Sierra Heights,Coalfield,Glen- Park. The steeply sloped bluffs and greenbelt east of Coulon coe, Honeydew, Presidents Park, North Highlands, High- enhance the setting. lands,Kennydale, Downtown Renton and Boeing. • In addition to views direct access is provided to one of the Access to Corridor Collector: Duvall/138th Ave.S.E.,May region's most outstanding recreation centers,Gene Coulon Valley Road Memorial Beach Park. Gateway Potential:It is high because SR-900(Sunset Blvd.) Average Slope of Corridor. Grade is relatively flat,suitable offers the major access into city from Issaquah and east King for both bicycles and pedestrians. County. The intersection of Sunset and DUvall is the most likely gateway into the city because this point marks a tran- sition from a more rural-wooded area to a more urban-com- MAY CREEK/HONEY CREEK mercial zone. Natural Amenities: They are limited along this corridor Regional Connections:Renton,Unincorporated King County, within the city limits. However,east of Duvall Ave.the area Issaquah has a nice rural quality with horse pastures and dense stands of conifers along Renton-Issaquah Road. Sub-regional Connections: Lake Washington,Kennydale, May Creek,May Creek County Park,Honey Creek,Sierra Average Slope: It is moderate,suitable for both pedestrians Heights,The Highlands,Coal Creek Parkway,May Valley, and bicyclists. Issaquah Alps. Access to Corridor Collector. Lake Washington Blvd.Coal Creek Parkway,Sunset Blvd. SOUTHEAST CORRIDORS Gateway Potential: It is good at the west end of the corridor CEDAR RIVER 1 where it intersects Lake Washington Blvd. Natural Amenities: There are abundant natural amenities, Regional Connections: Renton,Maple Valley,Black Dia- comprised of the May Creek and Honey Creek greenbelts. mood,Enumclaw These contain steep and densely vegetated slopes.Fish and Sub-regional Connections: Cedar River,Cedar River Natu- wildlife are present throughout the area. ral Zone, Skyfire Ridge,Maplewood Golf Course,Renton Civic Center, Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, Renton, Municipal Airport,Boeing,Lake Washington I // rrv� City Wide Master Trails Plan • Access to Corridor Collector: Maple Valley Highway,140th SOUTHWEST CORRIDORS -- Place S.E., Jones Road, Burnett Ave. S., Bronson Way THE VALLEY (Route 900),Airport Perimeter Road. Gateway Potential:The gateway potential of the Cedar River ORILLIA-PETROVITSKY Corridor is high and should be located at the proposed park to be sited at the new eastern city limits at Jones Road. Regional Connections: Tukwila,South Renton,Fairwood, Natural Amenities: These are great along the course of the Lake Youngs Watershed Cedar River and its associated natural zone. Not only does Sub-regional Connections: Christianson Trail,Green River, the Cedar River lend itself to bicycle and trail use,it also Valley Medical Center,Benson Hill,Fairwood Crest,Fair- serves as an excellent water trail for canoes,kayaks i rowboats wood Firs,Fairwood Shopping Center,Candlewood Ridge and innertubes. Average Slope:The slope along the river is flat,suitable for Corridor Collector: West Valley Road, Talbot Rd, 108th S.E.(Benson Rd.),140th Ave S.E. both pedestrians and bicyclists.However,upland sections of this corridor contain steep slopes which will'be difficult for City Gateway: This corridor should serve as a important some users to negotiate. gateway between Tukwila, the thriving Valley Medical Community,and the a quickly growing Fairwood neighbor- hoods. SEATTLE AND MERCER ISLAND WATER Natural Amenities: This corridor is low in natural amen- LINES ties. It is comprised of industrial and medical parks inter- spersed with retail and commercial centers. A large shop- pingRegional Connections: Renton,Unincorporated King County mall is proposed at the intersection of S.W.43rd and W. Valley Highway. Sub-regional Connections:North Soos Creek,Tiffany Park, . Slope:The slope is manageable,being relatively gentle with Lake Youngs Water Shed some steep areas. Access to Corridor Collector: Rainier Ave.(SR 167),Talbot Rd.,Benson Rd.S., Gateway Potential: It is high because as one travels along the THE GREEN RIVER VALLEY pipeline in a northeast direction,expansive views'of the city and Lake Washington unfold.The most dramatic territorial Regional Connections: Renton,Tukwila,Kent and Auburn vista appears from Renton Hill. A view park at the crest of the waterline would serve as an excellent gateway. Subregional Connections: The Rainier Ave. Linear Busi- ness District, Longacres,Green River Valley Office and In- Natural Amenities: They are medium to low. The waterline dustrial Parks,Valley Medical Services,Springbrook Trail, passes through mostly residential areas. However,there are Interurban.Trail interspersed sections of lush greenbelt. Access to Corridor Collector. S.W.43 St., Oaksdale Ave. Powerelines share the waterline right-of-way between Puget S.W.,Lind Ave.S.W.,S.W.16th,S.W.7th Drive and Philip Arnold Park. Gateway Potential: It is low to medium.The Green River Average Slope: The slope ranges from a flat grade to quite Valley passes through Renton,Tukwila,Kent and Auburn. steep. This variety offers opportunities for pedestrians and There are no distinctive landmarks to serve as a gateway into all terrain bicyclists,who seek the steeper terrain. the city of Renton from Kent or Tukwila.Although the S. 180th St.(S.W.43rd St.)bridge over the Green River would seem a likely gateway because S.W.43 St.is a shared bound- ary between Renton and Kent. /a City Wide Master Trails Plan The entrance to the Springbrook Trail could be enhanced to NORTHWEST CORRIDORS serve as a more dramatic gateway. WEST SHORE LAKE WASHINGTON Corridor's level of Natural Amenities:They are medium to high.The"Valley"area is comprised of two drainage systems Regional Connections: Renton,King County,Seattle in addition to the Green River. They are the Springbrook Creek and the proposed P-1 Drainage Channel. Associated Sub-regional Connections: Downtown Renton,Municipal - with these riparian systems are wetlands which support a Airport, Boeing, BrynMawr, Lakeridge, Rainier Beach, variety of plant and birdlife. Seward Park,and Seattle's Lake Washington Boulevard. There are also other wetlands within the valley which pro- Access to Corridor Collector. Rainier Ave.,Renton Ave./ vide habitat for plant and wildlife. Airport Way Average Slope of Corridor:It is flat. Potential to function as a Gateway to the City:The potential is high because it offers the only non-motorized route from Seattle. • BLACK RIVER Corridor's level of Natural Amenities There are views to Lake Washington and Mt.Rainier along much of this corn- Regional Connections: Renton,Tukwila,Seattle dor.The City of Seattle has built an impressive model for maximizing the natural amenities of this corridor through Sub-regional Connections: Rainier Business District,Ren- the linear park system developed along Lake Washington ton Center,Earlington Business Park,Metro Sewage Treat- Boulevard. ment Plant,Container Corporation of America,Longacres, Black River Office and Industrial Parks,Black River Ripar- Average Slope of Corridor. The slope is predominantly flat ian Forest/Heron Rookery,Fort Dent Park,and the Chris- with some gentle,rolling hills. tianson Trail Access to Corridor Collector. S.W.7th St.,Oakesdale Ave., Monster Rd./68th S.W.,Sunset Blvd.W. Gateway Potential: Gateway potential is high at the bridge over the Black River where 68th Ave S.W.(unincorporated King County) becomes Monster Rd. (Renton city limits). This point serves as a road and trail juncture, connecting Oakesdale Avenue,Monster Road,Fort Dent and the Black River Trail. Natural Amenities: They are medium to high. The Black River Riparian Forest is an exceptional open space amenity. It contains a unique vegetational complex including a stand of old growth Oregon Ash. The wetland area is also high in _ wildlife diversity and density. The steep banks of the green- belt above the railroad tracks are highly visible and feed the Black River Riparian system. They are a high priority for protection. Average Slope of Corridor.The slope is mostly flat with roll- ing hills along Monster Rd. /3 TRAIL STANDARDS The Ttail Standards element of the City-Wide'Mails Master NATURAL AREAS Plan contains three parts: 1) a discussion of the urban/ suburban environment;2)a listing of user group and their Within the suburban-and urban environment, there are requirements, and; 3) a listing of design considerations. natural areas and green belts along stream corridors and Together they provide the background necessarytb guide the steeply sloped areas. Trail presence and impact should be analysis of trail corridors and development of the trail sys- minimized and carefully integrated into these areas. tern.A trail standards matrix and a user preference matrix have been developed and are included in the Appendix. Transitions from these urban,suburban,and natural areas should blend and integrate to emphasize a passage from one environment to another. URBAN/SUBURBAN/NATURAL ENVIRONMENT USER GROUPS The City contains a mix of urban, suburban and natural environments which affect trail standard. Each presents The primary user groups for the City's trail plan are the different levels of use,intensity of use,site opportunities and pedestrian,the bicyclist,and the jogger/runner. The needs constraints. and preferences of each are described below. URBAN ENVIRONMENT PEDESTRIAN Urban trails are affected by the concentration and diversity The two groups of pedestrians are the walker and the recrea- of people,automobiles,land uses,and the highl}ll structured tionalist. environment. Attractions, nodes, and public spaces are abundant and the differences between them are shorter.The Trails for the walker provide connections from the home,to existing street grid and the Cedar River provide a framework shopping areas,schools or work.Walkers travel on a variety for the trail corridor system. Conflicts between motorized of streets and require direct routes,separation from traffic, and non-motorized traffic on city streets will require devel- controlled intersections,and lighting. opment of special design standards. Trails for the recreationalist provide a qualitative experi- SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT ence,including destinations,trail facilities,amenities,view overlooks,and loops.The recreationalist will tend to avoid Intra and inter-connection of neighborhoods are the key arterials and heavily traveled streets.The three categories of considerations for suburban trails.Generally,suburban area recreationalist are the exerciser,the nature walker and the are more private than the urban areas. The public spaces hiker. Exercise trails emphasize combined functional and occur as defined nodes at schools, parks, and commercial recreational amenities. The nature trails emphasize slow areas.The primary trips are from homes to these nodes,to travel with interpretive stations. The hiking trails occur work and city-wide or regional destinations. Distances are mainly in the rural environment. i longer,trafficvolumes lower(although at higher speeds)and there are fewer intersections. There are opportunities to accommodate new trail corridors within new development projects. . City Wide Master Trails Plan BICYCLIST DESIGN CRITERIA The four groups of bicyclists are the commuter,recreation- The five key trail design criteria,are the corridor,aesthetic, alist,tourist and competitor.For each group,safety and the maintenance,tread and facility considerations. qualitative experience are important. CORRIDOR CONSIDERATIONS The work commuter seeks out the route that is most direct, flat or gently sloping, • Locate trail corridors through a variety of environ- with few stops, and free of conflicts with, ments motorized traffic, pedestrians, or recrea- • Provide separated treads for bicycle and pedestrian tonal bicyclists.Generally these routes cor- users respond to arterial streets, sidewalks and • Provide rest stops trails to travel from home to the store.They • Thin and prune trees for view and safety enhancement tend to be slower, and use a variety of • Plant trees for shade and framing of views bicycles including three-wheelers. Revegetate disturbed edges • • Provide transition grading between adjacent side slopes The recreationalist seeks out separated and the flat trail and shoulder routes which connect destinations. The qualitative experience is more important AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS than directness and speed. Loops and flat or gently sloping routes and trail amenities are desirable. There is a mix of users and • Develop smooth rhythmic curves'in both horizontal speeds and vertical alignment to avoid repetition and disconti- nui ty The tourist looks for longer routes that • Use terrain and vegetation to frame views and provide connect to regional destinations Trail heads, gateways to mark the transition between,-zones and facilities and amenities are important.Like districts the recreationalist, they tend to travel at • Use terrain and vegetation to screen objectionable slower speeds and emphasize the qualita- views five experience. • Orient to landscape features such as water,rock,strong landform,interesting structures The competitor/athlete seeks out their own routes which combine the commuter routes, MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS steeper slopes and longer distances. • Minimize cut and fill by avoiding steep slopes JOGGER/RUNNER • Minimize trail surface deterioration and maintenance by locating trail well away from trees with near surface Most joggers and runners prefer routes with a qualitative roots experience,away from heavily traveled roadways.A variety ' Minimize maintenance of trail surface, buildings and of environments,surfaces,and slopes are important.Run- structures by avoiding wet areas ners will tend to seek out steeper and longer routes. Both • Mm maintenance costs by providing tread widths prefer loops. and curves sufficient for maintenance equipment EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES CONSIDERATIONS Equestrians also prefer routes which provide a qualitative • Restrooms--place in area of high visibility and activity experience.Trails tend to be longer,have limited contact to discourage vandalism; cluster structures for econ- with automobile traffic,have a natural surface,and omy and maintenance;use rustic materials traverse a variety of terrain. - , • Engineered bridges, wide enough for'maintenance equipment , City Wide Master Trails Plan • Install lighting to discourage vandalism of facilities and for user safety • Engineer timber retaining walls •• Anchor benches off tread to resist vandalism • Install trail markers at intersections and distance mark- ers at trail heads • Provide water drinking fountains TRAIL STANDARDS MATRIX The trail standards matrix provides design criteri for trail design and engineering for the four basic types of trails: pedestrian,bicycle,jogging/running,and equestri n. • USER PREFERENCE MATRIX The User Preference Matrix(in the Appendix)co pares the four main categories of users with the four trail types. It designates three levels of preference:high,moderate,low. i ' SITE FURNISHINGS/ AMENTIrIFS LIGHTING CLEARANCE TO HORIZONTAL SURFACE AND EDGE - (See City of Renton TRAIL TYPE WIDTH OBSTRUCTIONS SLOPE/STEPS ALIGNMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTIONS Public Works St.ndaHs) BICYCLE • 5 ft.minimum width • 8 ft.recommended • 5%maximum average • 100 ft.minimum curve • Coneerete • Shoulders at same clews- • Separated grade cross- • Sig u at key inter- one-way(difficult to en- vertical clearance slope radius(20 mph 4-thickness lion as pavement edge inks et intersections sections a CLASS I for ,not recommended) • 2 ft minimum horizon- • Sustained grades re- design speed) 2-4'sand or gravel • No curbs,edging with heavy traffic;if • Benches,restrooms, • 8 R min,width two-way tel clearance each side quire pulloff rest stops • 150 It,minimum on (dependent on soils and physically or economic- picnic areas at key Bike Path on 10 ft.recommended • 3 ft.recommended • Steeper slopes function downhill grades(30 loading ally not feasible,provide destinations Separated _ • 12 It.min.widthtwo-way • 4,5 ft.minimum railing of distance mph design speed) • Asphalt concrete traffic signals Right-of-Way with pedestrian,14 ft. height on bridges • No steps Y thickness • Stop or yield signs where recommended Separate • S R minimum separa- 2-6'gravel base(depend- traffic is not heavy bi�iand pedestrian ttoa from adjacent ent on soils and loading) • Generally crossing pathspossible � • 2%cross slope should occur at street • .Yellow center line intersections stripping where heavy • Curb cuts with Bush bicycle volumes are lip anticipated,tight curves • 45 degree min.angle at and along unlit sections intersections with rail- - road tracks,90 degrees recommended CLASS H • With adjacent striped • 8 R recommended • Same as Chu I Bicycle • Same as Class I Bicycle • Match adjacent • Shoulders et same • See accompanying • Signs at key Bike Lane parking. vertical akaranoe pavement elevation as pavement intersection plans intersections 5 R recommended • On highway bridges,an or curbs in urban/ • Grates with openings (One-way only) • With adjacent parking, inner barrier is required suburban environments narrower than bike DO 1tripes the tires and perpendi- 13-15It.recommended bikeway isdoserthan cular to id•rectionof • Parking prohibited with 5 R to the edge of the travel orb and gutter edge nearest travel lane 4 ft.recommended to gutter-5 ft.recommended to• Parking prohibited with shoulder-edge-4 ft. recommended CLASS El • • .14 R-width outside lax. • Same as Chu B Bicycle • Same as Class 1 Bicycle • Same as Clans I Bicycle • Same as pass II Bicycle • Same as Class B Bicycle • NA • Same as Class 1I mathon 3+lane Bike Route • 5 ft.minimum width • Bicycle where bicycle only on Y shoulder • 8 ft.minimum width - ' where bicycles and pedestrians share ' the shoulder • Less than 1,000 ADT and 30 mph speeds PEDESTRIAN • 2 R minimum width • 7 R minimum vertical • 10%maximum • NA • Natural • No edge or wood edging • NA • Trail heads and signs 4 ft.recommended clearance 20%short distances Bark • Benches,restrooms NATURE/HIKING 8 ft.recommended • 6-12 inch maximum Gravel (non-obtrusive)picnic TRAILS - • 2 ft.horizontal clearance riser height on steps areas at key destine- each side with landing wry 20 lions,view overlooks nets,railings on both - sides,no open risen • WALKS SEPARATE • 6ft.minimum width • Same as Class I Bicycle • 8%maximum • NA • Concrete,asphalt • Flush with adjacent NA • Lighting per City of FROM ROADS 8 ft.recommended • Stain same as Nature/ concrete(same as grade or wood edging Renton Parks (co-use with recreational • See Class I Bicycle for Hiking trails Class I Bicycle) Standards(variable bicyclists) jointpedestrian/ • • Unit pavers on concrete dependent on bicydeuse base contract SIDEWALKS • 6 ft.minimum commercial • Same as Nature/Hiking • 8%maximum • NA • Concrete • Curbs where adjacent • Street crossings at inter- • Landscaping (paralleling roadway) streets,12 ft.recom- Trails Greater to match roadway 4"thickness .to roadway sections or narrowed • Benches in high use mended with street fume- slope 3'leveling sand • Flush with adjacent mid-block crossings, areas lure or street trees grade maximize crossing • 5 ft.minimum suburban distance or urban arterials 6 R • Pedestrian recommended,5 ft.min . phasing actuated planting strip phassing JOGGING/RUNNING • 6 ft.minimum • Same as Natute/iking • Jogglog-10%maximum • NA • Variety.Cinder,natural, • No edge or wood edging - NA • Exercise stations Trails for shorts distances gravel,bark chips, • Sign.• Running-20%maximum asphalt for short distances . EQUESI•RIAN • 2 R minimum • 10 ft.vertical clearance • 20%maximum • NA • Compacted earth • No edge • NA • Sign • 1 ft.minimum horizon• surface,natural, tat clearance,3 ft. bark chips recommended TRAIL STANDARDS MATRIX TRAIL TYPE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN EQUESTRIAN NATURE/ USER TYPE CLASS I CLASS II CLASS HI HIKING JOGGING/ BIKE PATH BIKE LANE BIKE ROUTE TRAIL WALKS SIDEWALKS RUNNING EQUESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN WALKING-DESTINATION WORK M NA L - L M H L NA SHOPPING/ERRANDS M NA L L M H L NA SCHOOL M NA L L M H L NA RECREATIONIST EXERCISE_ H NA L H H M M NA NATURE WALKER H NA L H M L L NA HIKER H NA L H H L M NA Q0 BICYCLIST COMMUTER WORK H H M NA NA NA NA NA SHOPPING/ERRANDS H H H NA NA RECREATIONIST H H L NA NA NA NA NA TOURIST H H H NA NA NA NA NA COMPETITOR M H H NA NA NA NA JOGGER/RUNNER JOGGING H L L H H M H NA RUNNING H L L H H M H NA HORSEBACK RIDER NA NA NA NA NA NA NA H KEY: H=HIGH PREFERENCE M=MODERATE PREFERENCE N =NOTR PREFERENCE USER PREFERENCE MATRIX NANOT APPLICABLE /4 44;11(1...%1:' 4)V41 ! 4 ir Ito , igivItt f,c ,, . th r. ct 11.44.) �, � i dui 11 ii(lifil , .- 3,,, (4,:s-i. 5-r51° 4' i� iiiiti 1)11 ' e-a # i ' iliii* . .IrA 01 1 e �� ��• �h. -..�'�,1 c�1 Z MIN. _ �`�i�� -*"".44... ..V11. ':,11 t r;51FECd. t 41/4.9':'s O." If REG. Class I - Separate R . O . W ' 4 -Ill . ilia I ".i i ill\ill6:1 mt - •. • 4 r !. t-- • ;- • Ark:hp 0 ., iiV..4:1)/litftg%/ ,hi i• 2 o p 1if5c;."'I it', kJ �. .� . 1 S' MIN. b MIN. 1 �l ,' zo FCG. lZ REG. • Class I - Along Highway . i NO STRIPED STRIPED PARKING PARKING il fatalt. imam . . 1196.11mmit keek 7-00 LC" igso 1 • 1 1 1"--i " IteG• g.' Kam. Class II. - Parking Allowed ,cAld< .6.' NO CURB -• • :" CURB . ! /- moo A . C. ! r / ik) Vie: - ' IS `:• =r • .� d_W i s>" 1 • • Class II - Parking Prohibited BICYCLES & BICYCLES PEDESTRIANS ONLY oil ve ( ^ ran, . I .:; AV4413. • . . i 8, 1 i 9N 1, MIN• M Class III .1.114 of'"'„Id-4- 1-11.1j5:5 II iii Iti) /pi/ . ,,Z.%,v,61-r7" 4/ 1 fi i III 1 itt.)01Y1. 1110 �'' 111,71.11 ?WM ' I crs .‘...:_fri....d s �''1.i',', ,illl!' i�1p�������i�'4,,k; o I ifiltii"A11.11::),q ii;:*.4- FP :--- , \ i .Irlf/!fili, .4144 ti 41 VN t° 0 - .. . ‘.1PWM "°1.-.•.1° MI6 t if II'ma-1. 1 • 4' Rom. Hiking Trail J PEDESTRIAN TRAILS MASTER PIA\ --.....N\\ •, . Nacs„, )1,:f '4.27' 2 '\ ) ) ( )r � 1 — (-_,T t \ i - as '1, r� v . ; .„ipkrt, it2--,6j,fs\ .'s, Pelt - \)__N ._ ,, 1 cri..-7-...----.\-----. :.. :. ...4 i 1 \ \I 'AI (• lai ill) ,�►� �f, \ 1 Vw ( z' \ \ 40 • B��e l` . • • •M y k rk ® • ill: '. o • HP ; 4,1 , - '11'., 9 , ry. Stoll.. v ' ,4 •• l`, -- --- piiiii,, \ II y 10 ,,,, wnwo enrrr III allit ii \---\\-\,\„\\\.. ■■ �I 111r O i , .' 1;111i \ !j� _�>) I\ . E 14) 11 1 1� `/ 11.E a III is I I,ll17 �� � ® ter _ � II -;- _ \ • ;,-eJ�, Molloy ':e� / r ) ' liv p 'tom ) A 1 1 / r W„., lk.4. .:.• t• AID �E • tIOP • • 1 w ti,;1� root •• f�i�tll •p •, : `*. • vj'f -7# • ':< •••O • - • e . +f. � ail s • • • cEVt.? .'i •/ �- • P • , �� •, I `~- •. \ tI LiiJa ' � • •` � ♦c •• •• ••�"�\W.+� ; I .1P \ I / , 1� • .P.rth. • °„`: �, d I" +I— II- �''T •.roll d •. " •' • • ....� • ' �� �� _• G►,41e,c.��.rwa• • •• �+ ,am �'► As_ ,, .: 1\\\‘u••.,E b(. ...... .,,,,,• eAL te"..) • • • .its /( •:": N.J.H ., 4., ',‘ 04,,.., ..'It',. ..,, __,..., 40' ( L0063 . 0, ,e_ , . , . • ° � � ; � o o 4r0 o • !o - • o oo + ,! . • I - O 4 i;.V p+0/ i---'70 . . -- — A . i, 1 , -375 ,, 0 tr.....hit 0 '.1) • !! .;/o. -I ., : 4 etir•I`f.' ''',. 0 ,i) ,rir- :: ,c,,,,, i .44-0. ig,1 • '' ) 0 • . L--- .___J .1,, : ,:t — -Pr. • 0 / H 1il - t af.s;i �ti lr ..) ..,-----N ,i / : t 1 7 'Ix �• /' • itl,,,,: it ��i i r a : ( ��• — Y 01 (16'44'1 ') ..1'''' o'..ahlik), -...? t, . gi I . 1 ! ii _/- C'.-C4',,i,bY 4s' Lave ' KEY MAJOR TRAILS 0 0 O MINOR TRAILS 0 0 0 Lake Washington Pacific Coast Railroad May Creek Kennydale Creek IfI Honey Creek Devil's Elbow 111111111 10411J1,I!A I I I i � Airport Perimeter Road Bonneville 1, Union 1M111P Min,'llil.'Q�' Cedar Crest System Grant Creek s t.4y Panther Creek Wetlands Cedar River Systems Springgbrook Wetlands 0 .25mi Soml 75m1 t.00m1 Lake Youngs Waterline P.l Channel Cascade Waterline Empire Ridge Springbrook Interurban ,41°''41144. \''l Y Orot, Bieck giver inlik lu' Purnell +IIIIII 88Q Puget Power Sunset Parke Greenbelts "'0"S4 �s Soos Christianson =::li`.`:' NORTH Sooa Creek ♦ ..IL ♦ \\......„.......... i 100., NT � PROPOSED OSED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM J MAJOR TRAILS Airport Perimeter Rd.; it continues around the Airport, exiting to Rainier Ave S. through the - Major trails are generally large in extent and usually:of a Airport's north entrance. The trail then proceeds 1 " significant regional value, and form the backbone of the northbound on Rainier Avenue,paralleling the trails system.They are often multi-use,accommodating both southeast shore of Lake Washington. pedestrians and cyclists. LAKE WASHINGTON TRAIL Opportunities/Amenities: The trail connects Bellevue and Renton. • Recommended Route: The trail follows the existing I-405 The trail links the following parks and greenbelts: Ken- Trail, Ripley Lane, Lake Washington Blvd., Park Ave. N., nydale Beach Park,Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park,the and N.6th St.to the Cedar River Trail. proposc,s May Creek Park. The Lake Washington Trail provides connections to four other main trail systems: Cedar Lake Washington Loop: This portion of the River Trail,Pacific Coast Railroad Trail,Kennydale Creek Lake Loop follows the Cedar River Ttiail to Trail,and the May Creek Trail. _ Y' `� Icy14 4 't!Ilk t •' ' �. -- .- -- liv.;_ /pi ,.___. 4i....le ,,,,,. Nir. _ or 14 ... Vii' 1iT : !. :- I.:. •' -�f_ ��� - "".^/ - _ - I _ _ - _124tyJu,man ,nniiio_ TiIu 1ll!9III.i,,I U11!!IIIII hi- ;ter= �`� �y4'=..��`-�•:1? _V �•ter�� - a - _ modA .•ft: /_ 5 T;�'- ��� - �11A it ill/ -tom q.19 -- � --%. \�+— •-' . • _I, - _ 14 ',';it ilitir 01 il . r- _ . _ - - Expanded pockets of right-of-way along Lake Washington Blvd provide excellent opportunities for pocket parks.Pictured here is a conceptualized view of the proposed Burnett Viewpoint Park This park would provide a roadside stopping place to rest and enjoy vistas of the lake,MG Rainier,and dramatic Olympic sunsets. . • 4a City Wide Master Trails Plan Views are provided out to Lake Washington,the log booms tally.Bellevue's sections of the trail are in place from New- of the Barbee Mill, Gene Coulon Park, Boeing, Mercer port Shores to Renton,.utilizing the I-405 right of way and Island, Seattle, the Olympic mountain range and Mount quiet residential streets. Rainier. There is sufficient right-of-way along most of Lake Washing- Expanded pockets of right-of-way exist along the west side of ton Blvd.to build a pedestrian walkway. The expense neces- the road where potential viewpoint and/or pocket parks sary.to expand the narrow sections will be justified by the could be developed. This might require additional land high usage that this trail will receive. It will serve local acquisition. neighborhoods,major nearby employment centers,and the region at large. The trail connects regional parks: Gene In Renton,Lake Washington Boulevard is topographically Coulon Park at the southern end of the boulevard and May elevated above the lake. Water access is provided at the Creek Park to the north. Acrpss to the proposed Kennydale beach parks. Creek and Pacific Coast Railroad trails is also feasible. A major greenbelt extends along the east side of Lake Wash- The inclusion of Lake Washington Viewpoints Acquisition ington Boulevard between Park Ave.and Burnett Ave N. and Development in the 1989 King County Open Space Bond Issue will serve as an excellent catalyst for development Constraints: This area is characterized by steep slopes west of the Lake Washington Trail. Because these projects will of the Boulevard and a combination of ravines and greenbelt have to be completed within the next three years,they will that rise above the boulevard to the east. Although the City help to initiate further improvements to the boulevard for ! owns roughly 70 feet of right-of-way along L ake Washington pedestrians and bicyclists. Boulevard,in some sections there is limited flat land upon . which to locate both a walkway and bike lane. The steeper, narrower sections will be difficult to engineer and conse- SOUTH LAKE CONNECTOR quently,expensive to construct. - - Recommended Route: This trail would connect the Cedar Initial indications are that the Kennydale neighborhood is in River Trail to Coulon Beach Park via Boeing's lakefront,the favor of unproved facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. section of beach owned by the State,and the lakefront behind Parking however, may be an issue for homeowners who the Shuffleton Power Plant. This will be a combined over- currently utilize the right-of-way for their only available the-water boardwalk and shoreline trail. parking. Opportunities/Amenities: This section will complete one of The greenbelt on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd.is the missing links in a continuous route around Lake Wash- in private ownership. Development pressures have put this ington, known as 'The Lake Loop'. The trail will be an- land in eminent threat of conversion to residential use. chored by the Cedar River Trail to the west and Coulon Beach Park to the east. Feasibility:Even with the constraint of insufficient right-of- ,;..,�.. _ „ way along Lake Washington Boulevard,development of the _ . • _._. -i -. 141 ." Lake Washington Trail is feasible if carried out incremen- �• ` 'f- ''-- : :•-. ,''` . 1- ‘ - .t., .11-- L-','174" - :4-e-; •14, -,' ''.`:-. ..,-rr,,,, .,,,, ..........„... .„ .... ,• c... ....,-, ,-. ,e ---',..,- „,,. . ;$-; ; t�" . a.t _; te . F ' , : , �i `'' However,there are alternative`possibilities for utilizing this I.- right-of-way,which may better realize Lake Washington Much of the right-of-way is currently utilized for parking; Boulevard for its recreational and aesthetic values.Pictured especially during the summer months. here is Seattle's treatment of Lake Washington Boulevard. 43 . I City Wide Master Trails Plan a. t ,'` $ 's, IA .' )" •'t. '' c_ , A,�'' . w Js, ,a i • ; rsf }'t"•., ••5• .Ii 4 . ' .; F 4 i .. f 1 • x �@ r > fit •' •a��i a .•'7sa .�.t �' .''i i w` p fit- -+ht"'. • .— •.. -`� s > • .%' a t .c,. .• .,+ yr.^= 4 y:k`ii Y' rig' 3;;,. �, .. {a•� J � '.„ , �7i..rL� 4,. � � �s � t' 3 �v��.��,^^�� �" 4l,�' rr ''' 4., _... , t. 1 t w .: ''tf'� fit ,_ r •u' a.w ` .€ '"ti- w• `` E011v a» .� ~ it,,k—iN v,.;,.1 4.:4:, 4—,:t`1$`..;ti'4 1.r,':,lr ';'S`';:.-=�•, �4 o.fit i, �.�y 7.r: 1•.s3t b y 7-:,.: (r-4 i T ,, .. {r."•;. sy. ;� 1 �i`" °iy rr• H {+.x.. c 1: . ,r. :��.3 . ! • Y ` 'ri k�{,a �'°J• .1rk•A 4'4 � yx�e+,1h �.... ..� ti.. , ,a s '.i. • l‘i.�%.._ i Atli .., * 1< €* •,3R,",'1tki ! . r;e"*Z.' ', w+.;- :, 4 kite` Iy� `.-'i Y x' . ;h iiadty, i�'�' �•4'. +n :s' t t c% "`...11AAi "'tL .,r� '`»i.. ' L:t' et a V4� s • a: 'r'v , • '• r • 4.85 '•i"of 'e i /11ypi �:t 1- •fit. ig 4/• ., f' fr 70 l fir,, ` '12i'i_ ': ",1•5. : ' ' -4` i SAi"`. • ""f, t °. �f• Y S r-. i ST`` .v i,4*'- e!'i '%irs- wit;. ...ti'.. + -. ~ -1' w As part of Boeing's expansion plan,the company has granted the City of Renton an easement along their lake shore. The floating boardwalk trail will not only create a physical However,continuity of this trail is not possible without the link with Coulon Park,but will provide a visual and thematic section along Puget Power. link as well since Gene Coulon Park is comprised of a series of boardwalks and promenades. PARK/BRONSON CONNECTORS The character is the South Lake trail will be an,interesting mix of natural and industrial features.Views to the north and - northwest will be of the lake,its associated boating activity, Recommended Route: Follow Park Ave south to Bronson Gene Coulon Park and the forested bluffs that rise above it. Way in order to connect to the Cedar River Trail at the civic center. Follow Park Ave. south to N.E. 6th in order to In contrast, views to the south and southwest are of the connect to Airport Perimeter Rd.via the Civlar River Trail. Shuffleton power plant, The Boeing Airplane operations, _ and the Municipal Airport.Though not necessarily appeal- Opportunities/Amenities: This is the most direct route to ing aesthetically,these sights are interesting because of their the civic center and provides connections to the highly scale and uniqueness. popular urban zone Cedar River Trail. Sidewalks are con- tinuous from Lake Washington Blvd.to Bronson. Constraints: A land based trail would need to utilize both Puget Power and Boeing property right-of-ways.,This raises Constraints: Rush hour traffic is heavy,creating noise and significant security and access issues for both companies. air pollution. Aesthetics are poor through most of the Boeing corridor and beyond to N.E.4th. Though from N.E. Feasibility: Mitigation measures associated with Boeing's 4th to Bronson the area is more residential and subsequently, - expansion have resulted in recent trail development plans. is quieter with less traffic. 441 City Wide Master Trails Plan Feasibility: Development of this pedestrian corridor is MAY CREEK TRAIL feasible as mitigation measures must be taken against the expanding development proposed for North Renton. Ameni- ties such as wider sidewalks with landscape buffers are typical Recommended Route: This unpaved trail will follow the forms of development mitigation which could be utilized east-west course of May Creek from Lake Washington Blvd. along this trail. east to Cougar Mountain. Although the portion of the May Creek greenbelt within the official city limits extends only as New traffic routing on Garden,Park,and Houser Avenues far east as Devil's Elbow,King County(which has designated could also playa major role in transformation of this corridor most of the greenbelt as the May Creek County Park), plans into a pleasant pedestrian environment. to develop a continuous trail to Cougar Mountain County Park. GARDEN/6TH/BRONSON Opportunities/Amenities:The May Creek Trail will connect CONNECTORS the Lake Washington,Honey Creek,Union, and Issaquah Alps Trails. Recommended Route: From the southern terminus of Lake May Creek is heavily wooded and surrounded by steep slopes. Washington Blvd.continue south along Garden Ave.N. to The lush greenbelt has been designated in the City's Compre- Bronson Way. The trail continues along Bronson to the hensive Plan to be preserved as public open space. Cedar River Trail. Opportunities/Amenities: Traffic is currently lighter than il" 'sr- "` 1; '� `K 11{ l • along the Park Ave.corridor,resulting in less noise and air i • 1 • , pollution. However, redevelopment of the PACCAR site •r • ,..• . r ='' - will probably create a very different scenario. dit ` .� v • • Constraints: Ironically, though called Garden Ave., this yy� •t�} R 'r �`" • Al • '„,•= Y -.. AF yr, road is devoid of any landscape treatment between Lake kb;'?; i -'+� fie 1 ��'4 y r, Washington Blvd.and N.E.8th Street.It is more a garden of f 0 .J' i �c = ., concrete and parking lots. However,landscaping is in place . ' •`,7;.� i- t y y` '°?'" on the east side of Garden between N.E. 4th and N.E.8th z 'M� Streets. � - t� s� � �. , Sidewalks exist along the length of corridor,but not continu- ously on both sides of the street. -1,--• ." z- "1° - .K j x = Feasibility: Similar to Park Avenue,Garden Avenue should ` .. be redesigned to accommodate North Renton's expanded =_ -; :-' ,- .;,: development. f "' '; r" � ? , --a . ., . In terms of cost and traffic issues,only one of these two routes -' `:: ` ' --Park or Garden--should be developed as a major pedes- "` .ice trian corridor connecting the Lake Washington and the - -c' ram.. ' .. Cedar River Trails. Park Ave. N. is recommended over - `�" +t''n-.` , .�.< .� 'mac=': � -..x Garden Ave. N. due to the expansiveness of the Boeing 4, • ,,--_,,r ?*.•'—'- - operations along most of its length and the closer proximity ±- of Park to the Cedar River Trail. The busline also runs along '�► s ,--- Park Ave N;thus it makes more sense to improve this route ' ;`, +. g_t f'`- x- ' • for pedestrians. - `' •.., The busline also runs along Park Ave.Thus,it would then May Creek is an attractive meandering stream with gravel make more sense to improve this route for pedestrians over bars,small vegetated islands,and log bridges across its bicyclists. banks. The vine maples and alders that line the shore arch ' over the stream,providing shade for the migrating fish and scenic vistas for human visitors. i .A,. City Wide Master Trails Plan During spawning season, salmon can be observed making The protection and enhancement of the salmon run and the r their way up the creek. The abundance of animal trails steep slopes are significant environmental issues which will i around the creek indicates the presence of other forms of be considered in the development of this trail corridor. , ".___ wildlife.' Feasibility: Over the years King County has pursued a Much of the May Creek greenbelt has been acquired by King program of property acquisition in order to convert May County for public park use. Remaining parcels will be Creek into a major regional park. A number of key parcels purchased through the 1989 Open Space Boid Issue. have been acquired,but there are still missing links. Fortu- nately,the combined efforts of the King County Open Space _ Because the greenbelt east of I-405 extends away from the Bond Issue,the King County Conservation Futures Tax,and freeway and its associated noise,it is one of the quietest areas Washington Wildlife and Recreation Coalition should pro- in the city. The natural character of the area should not be vide resources to protect more of the May Creek greenbelt. compromised by the presence of human activities here. _ Presently,only'half of the May Creek greenbelt lies within Constraints: Soil conditions,habitat sensitivity,and other the city limits,but it is assumed that eventually the section _ environmental conditions will require extens ve investiga- between 116th Ave S.E. and Coal Creek Parkway will be tions. within Renton's boundaries. ' / 1 l�I1 l) P ' 11( I , ..r-� .. j,,/ r n I � -, rlri -' ` `-, -,.,- r IIli, ; _ . .o V; yr • T.,. jL<L"'I:::, i C. •`'� ` .� 0 I .. .. illij i, ,( lil 1, -... .'-^ i ti 1.. .. - . ' .1! . '7"-*-N l ' t41/1;N14:41-t.."141.6.- _ !�•. *• 1.�.. ` •- 'L0 ��t• `y _ J \ ;le I � 4. —ter _� r'el !..o..O 1 1.00 • Mil • "' - . \ ' --- a aP "o OP -+ o r °--�- �� , ' ;teeo "I I -s .::tom( , 4. e i l h '4,j1 o \ nnf on "_ Small foot bridges will enable the trail to follow alternate sides of the creek 4t City Wide Master Trails Plan HONEY CREEK grants this purpose as well. Consequently,continuity of the trail is dependent upon gaining additional trail easements. Recommended Route: The trail will begin in the vicinity of Disturbance of vegetation along the steep slopes must be Sunset and Union Avenues,extending roughly one mile to minimized in order to prevent erosion and reduce sound Devil's Elbow. It will continue for another third of a mile to penetration. the confluence with May Creek. South of the Devil's Elbow pump station the trail will follow an existing utility mainte- Feasibility: There ne u1s to be a joint trail and conservation , nance road. North of Devil's Elbow it will utilize an aban- easement extending the length of Honey Creek from Union Boned residential access road that parallels the east side of Avenue to the confluence with May Creek.The character of the Honey Creek. the walk would be significantly compromised if development were allowed to make its presence felt along the hillsides or Opportunities/Amenities: The Honey Creek corridor, sur- if the slopes were allowed to be cleared of their protective rounded by suburban development,is a unique natural re- vegetation. source to be treasured and preserved. A walk through this area offers one of the most tranquil and visually soothing Although the City has a tree cutting ordinance, presently experiences to be found in the city. The rushing sound of the there is no greenbelt conservation ordinance in effect. creek and the birdsong filled air give the illusion of being far out in the country.The traffic noise that plagues the Renton area does not exist throughout most of Honey Creek. AIRPORT PERIMETER ROAD _ ' _;.., �.; t .iK.:;:: Recommended Route: The route would follow the perime- „p i ,; ` r tA�- �, ter of the Airport from the north gate at Rainier Avenue to �'�',, r '-�";• _•r`1": - =. .'A-` .. ” the east side of the Airport where there is a bridge connec- -,...••;t, 4. r• • • 4. %.•,.,!,c'z tion to the Cedar River Trail. r:. �; 7 3`� at Because the northwest city limits begin at the Municipal `` v� .' _ I 'i Airport,the north Airport gate would serve as an excellent _�. as•�- r J '4 `- pedestrian gateway into the city. It could be enhanced with -..4,'`` :`-f . - improved signage and maps. ''r � �• ': - .- Opportunities/Amenities: This road will provide a pleasant 4.. ' , _ - - ".,• - -"."---�--- ' alternative to the current noise and high speed traffic that �yyrr . • �"" ' _ 'v ' plagues Rainier Ave.and Airport Way.It is used regularly by -f � ' e'"' ``4. =• �"` �= walkers and joggers even• ,�: „ ;�,�,;: ;.,,.� •.; :-� though jogging is prohibited along 1 ,.- "~^� _ -a: ''• this route. • ..r . H • • • : ` , ,' S"tom k'}-.; Honey Creek is a unique natural resource to be treasured and -' � * �; •: - Although residential development exists along Honey Creek, *.4,---, : ,_. . •, ` 4 it is set back far enough so that it is not visible from most of 1--. _-1!�- ., ..- the trail. Constraints: Although a road already exists along much of 1 _ the proposed trail's length, the utility easement south of ems. —-- �_ — 1 Devil's Elbow does not extend all the way to Union.Further- more, an easement granted for utility purposes may not The existing roadside landscaping along the west side of necessarily provide for trail access unless the property owner Airport Perimeter Rd. offers the setting for a pedestrian trail c97 .. City Wide Master Trails Plan F2st Perimeter Road runs parallel to the Cedar River. A well as an international range of commercial planes which - paved or gravel pedestrian path could easily meander be- are produced by Boeing. Bench placement would provide tween Airport Perimeter road and Cedar River on the east, popular viewing areas. and between the Perimeter Road and Rainier Ave. on the . west. Kiwanis park is located at the southwest corner of the airport property, at grade with Rainier Ave. The park could be Airport Perimeter Road is surrounded by continuous road- expanded and steps constructed in order to integrate it into side landscaping,with grassy berms and the tree-lined river the greenbelt area on the southwest corner of Airport Pe- bank.Colorful and ever-changing views are offered into the rimeter Rd. Airport where there is a variety of small commuter planes,as I Renton's economic!history is integrally related to the Air- port. The Airport'Trail could be used to commemorate ,,3t- a - t-?'`-• `_`r--% ' noteworthyevents,such as the creation of the B-29 bombers . ., .A. a ; c e'i-1 r;' ,v 1.4. 7 , during World War,II and legendary figures, such as Will ,, +' J.. p Rogers,who was last seen leaving Renton Airfield should be • - , fostered along this trail. A series of educational signs could -.-_ ,� ; ,. =*r ..!' punctuate the route around the airport.. : „*. +� ,,, .,_4 Constraints: The major issues regarding this route are ..- `-' - �ii . ,,w =; ., Ux jf` ,�'''rt-Ip Airport security and pedestrian safety. The road exists as a ., public right-of-way,granting access for Boeing,private air- .: 14� �R ., :•,' i craft owners,and patrons of Airport businesses, including _ ` Y" - •1 - - the restaurant. However, those without business at the ?�4 . ., airport are expected to confine their viewing of airport .' activities to the area immediately behind and adjacent to the Perimeter Road. East Airport Perimeter Rd parallels the west bank of the Feasibility: The airport is a destination in its own right,as Cedar River. There is sufficient space between the river and people seem to enjoy its sights which include a variety of the trees along the edge of the road to develop an inviting planes,their frequent take-offs and landings. Opportunities pedestrian footpath. need to be developed for viewing these activities from the safety of Perimeter Rd.. ALF:" ,1 5e,,..7:--' ,.,- , N. L . c. \ ajoiK- I . tip • 0411 ith,3 1 c....1 ..... 9 , . -- -- LSD9.4E1 isIICE� WL'-`1f 1'f-41MG'fG'fC KD5D�,61KEf /.LYAu D, YEt�(hT10N / Pei, _.p9-f1j ._ A!A'f URAL 3{•OPE .fwc.- 1fplig�' FGi)� • 1 -- 1 City Wide Master Trails Plan UNION TRAIL Opportunities/Amenities: The Union Trail provides a con- tinuous north-south trail from the south end of the city limits to unincorporated King County. The trail connects to the Recommended Route: begins within the Union St.right-of- Cedar Crest Trail, Honey Creek Trail, Devil's Elbow and way above Maplewood Golf Course and proceeds north as a May Creek Trails. suburban sidewalk trail outside of the city limits to S.E.96th Way. The Union 'Bail then continues north across May Constraints: Mailboxes have been placed on posts in the Creek along the unpaved Seattle Waterline right-of-way. middle of the sidewalk,making it difficult for more than one -. - person to walk down the street together. It is impossible to < , - + i push a baby carriage along these sidewalks with such ob- ; ��; ' •b stacles. t V4h _ - i z ,:. Traffic is another problem since Union Ave.is one of Ren- - t:; �-. tons main urban arterials. r �S ' i - Feasibility: The development of the Union Trail for pedes- -��, . ..-:4 trians is very feasible because sidewalks are already in place • along the length of Union Avenue. Mailbox placement will - have to be worked out with the U.S. Postal Service. The extension of this trail north and south of the existing Union ' Avenue will utili7P the waterline right-of-way to connect to the May Creek,Devil's Elbow,and Cedar Crest Trails. Mailboxes placed in the middle of the sidewalk inhibit pedestrian movement. 3 e .'� -«;S :' x... , A '.' '� ^. ,.. . - • e 4 X ..t , • �' a ° ` vF -1/4;4.". ' • . "' ' : i '- t., 4.< ii, 1 . J .. c....,,, , ,,... ...... tilk .-3itt4k‘;'74,):.'i f,r4 :7 r - / . - _.�:`.. . ;t� ,_4 . . Sri • ;j .. `_ •J Panoramic views of the Maple Valley can be seen from the Cedar Crest. . 4 City Wide Master Trails Plan CEDAR CREST TRAIL To make connections with the Cedar River System the Cedar Crest Trail will have,to cross a substantial barrier:the Maple Valley Highway. This road needs to take on a revised character when it enters Renton. Traffic speeds will need to Recommended Route: The Cedar Crest Trail begins at the be slowed and safe pedestrian crossing points provided. This base of the slope on the west side of the Monterey Terrace roadway should safely accommodate pedestrian as well as development,ascending the ridge,and then proceeds along automobiles. the crest in a southeasterly direction,until intersecting the Union Trailhead. This trail has the potential to access the Cedar River Trail System at two key points: Opportunities/Amenities: Territorial views of the Maple Valley are afforded from various points along t e crest. 1) The pedestrian crossing of the Maple Valley Highway which will be coordinated with-the The Cedar Crest Trail provides access across an extensive entrance to Cedar River Park. The Cedar River area where there are no other pedestrian provisions. Pro- Master Plan calls for a connecting bridge across posed residential development in this area will provide an the river from Cedar River Park to the Cedar opportunity for trail development through mitigation re- River Trail. quirements. However,until that bridge is constructed it will The Cedar Crest Trail will make connections to r River, be possible to reach the Cedar River Trail by Sunset-Puget Power,and Union Trails. crossing Houser Way to the Henry Moses Pool and then crossing to the south side of the river Constraints: Although the crest is relatively fla.,access to using the Houser pedestrian bridge. the top of the ridge is over very steep terrain. There are two potential routes from the Cedar Crest Trail dov'n into the 2) If future development west of the Maplewood - - valley.The first possibility would be to utilize the same Puget neighborhood; builds a road down to Maple Power right-of-way that is proposed for the Puget Sunset Valley Highway, this road should include a Trail. This would mean a fairly steep trail that will, of pedestrianized,inter5ection to cross the highway. necessity,need to employ a series of switchbacks to make it .This is important due to the close proximity to negotiable.Use of the Bonneville right-of-way is impractical the new passive recreation park. (Jordan La- due to the excessively steep terrain.The slope is so extreme Rue property)which includes the wooden bridge that even with switchbacks it would be too difficult for most over the Cedar River. of Renton's walking and hiking population. - The best route would be a trail parallel to the proposed road, CEDAR RIVER TRAIL/URBAN which is planned to accommodate the future residential developments east of Monterey Terrace.This road will meet INDUSTRIAL ZONE Maple Valley Highway west of the Maplewood Neighbor- hood. Recommended Route:This existing trail extends north from Traffic noise from Maple Valley Highway compromises the Renton's Civic Center almost to Lake Washington where the trail experience.Although it requires a substantial density of trail is terminated at the Boeing property. vegetation to physically mute the traffic sounds 1 efforts to Opportunities/Amenities: It provides the unique opportu- preserve maximum tree and ground cover will at least pro- nit, of accessing the Cedar River from the heart of the vide a visual and hence,psychological sound bu er. This is downtown. Utilized throughout the entire day by strollers also nPr�sary to stabilize the highly erosive soils of this area. and joggers,the trail is especially popular during the lunchtime Feasibility:Feasibility of developing the Cedar Crest Trail is hours because it is located so conveniently to Boeing and good because this area is still relatively undeveloped and offices in the CBD. Benches offer pleasant places to eat, would be difficult to do so due to topographic and soil read,or socialize. limitations. The trail's proximity to the Renton Senior Center provides Further opportunities for trail development may result from senior citizens with a safe and scenic means of exercising and the recreation mitigation that will accompany proposed socializing. future development east of Monterey Terrace. 30 _, City Wide Master Trails Plan 1 , ipi ',-t• lifi ihr. sil 'fiZ.k."....---. -..r • �,,,W..-;--.,. ...:._ ,, \ v ::\firik- ,,, � Vi u N. .fir ► A section through the Cedar River Valley(Maple Valley)depicting the Cedar Crest Trail;Maple Valley Highway, Cedar River, The existence of the trail within the city's industrial zone p demonstrates how recreational features can coexist with the •;i� i * ` r',:-N.•Lo. � .."'• • • ' industries that help support the City and its employees. The • i• "•:`_71.7:9 -°'. ��4, ;�•i •.. •-• •• trail gives vitality to the area,improves both the aesthetics, '., =: _ and the environment. ./..J j :_ . " r Water arr csisexcellentbothvisuallyandphysically.During ?,% J ; �, the summer months people are frequently seen cooling their ; `' '':fib ,"•��°= r ". feet as they wade barefoot through the shallow water. Others I - •.-.*�i:".. ..:{:•!r ; t -: enjoy fishing from the banks or off of the sandbars. 1 ��:" 1'jrfi 1 ;i 1 j ,..t. i .,,Y In addition to its recreational and scenic qualities the Cedar i tic_ "� ' River Trail has excellent educational potential. The(war t: - ' �°� �.,„ . •s '; • 4 � ° ti River is a major salmon spawning waterway. The trail along j= its course provides urban dwellers with the rare opportunity The Urban and Industrial sections of the Cedar River Trail to witness,within the confines of the city,the brightly colored have been in place since 1979. This trail is extremely popular with people of all ages and ability levels. salmon making their passage upstream, 3l City Wide Master Trails Plan ;rr ♦ o T �� 1 •, Ii.;,. gir �• i� t . 1,'. If ` iNlli.._ y_ 1:1'i `�. Des . 1 ((( �,la and Cedar River Natural Zone Trail. The Cedar River Trail System will act as a spine along which CEDAR RIVER TRAIL URBAN/ many other proposed trails will connect. Its northern termi- nus will no longer dead-end before the lake,but will make a NATURAL ZONE direct connection with the South Lake Washington Trail which will ultimately connect to Gene Coulon Park. Access to the Lake Washington Trail can be gained via the 6th Recommended Route: This trail is actually a system of trails Avenue connector. Additional links will be made with the that will pass through the civic center and the Cedar River Natural Zone.A paved Burl- Burnett Pedestrian Corridor, S.2nd and S. 3rd Avenues inmixed-use trail will occupy the the CBD. The Cedar River Trail also has potential to the ington Northern Railroad right-of-way after abandonment. connect to the Lake Youngs Waterline Trail on Renton Hill Thiss trail will extend southeast from the civic center,past the and the northern section of the Grant Creek Trail which MaplO°d Golf Course,to the new city limits at Jones Rd parallels lower Renton Hill. A pedestrian only footpath will follow the course of the river. Smaller trails will branch out from this river trail. This foot Constraints: The trail is already built and very successful. trail will include connections to Cmar River Park and the Feasibility: The Cedar River Trails' connection to other Jordan La-Rue property which will be developed into a trails will be a key factor in the overall systems development. passive park 3z il City Wide Master Trails Plan ,, ram_ • �..sa) r<r•x'<a. ' ^ x••-E w+.a a'°.t'Y r 3 • .evwx • Caen t -w•ay '.' . s a «a"„ . ,....� Cn'„x.„.„ 4 .e., +r^`, s..", :. t T - r : f.. 7ww 7 prOpprIMIner" *4 wet ,t-1...,..., ..,--, . —..a. ,t,&.._',.,..-:,- ::::- 4 t * , e w:. ✓ten.:e"-- ..0 �3 may' f "V-' . r �r" ,�;,`'.!, 'r •� ^'; x',�z s +� '^ s.`e� ;M:% s • ale ,. , ... Currently the Cedar River Trail ends at the Boeing property before reaching the mouth of the river at Lake• Washington. However,the recent Boeing expansion will open up the Boeing shoreline.A combined onshore and floating trail will eventually connect the Cedar River Trail to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and the Lake Washington Trail. .,y ^`� ,. ,{ . ,� � may. • .� a' 1..:nm >� a +' * 4- . _ .•q -- .ozv..;..aa.rrs�s a `7 ,, - • .,r. :4. x .w ` • " y5 C6— -. Cya r ,, ar ' ,y@8.. ' , ' tuW-' _ 1 ry . m *4:; t*. ,i7., t`� '' : ' , , ' w�:' ` '' + 1,, , y. ,? ,t .s . —'. � 'c •• "� � . , is .*,,,, .... , „el..,"_."4,,,,"r..;,.. 001:41*.t...." ,4.../,',„- -, —.I", ,...,-+N„,.... ✓s s 33 City Wide Master Trails Plan •Opportunities/Amenities: This trail system will provide a ? '; - it, variety of trails which pass through the extensive natural , x► , Si,•• z=►s e zone conservancy. The trail is rich in passive and active a4 ` �� �; Y, recreation amenities.These include meadows,woods,a perched t i t a• ' - ' � �'a '� sire ?� t `.{ n �.ti�zj�� �.�' ' ` liyw marsh,proposed ballfields,access to the Cedar River,Cedar cl + ' River Park, Maplewood Golf Course, and the recreation I� • , land just north of the golf course. r: t The trail along the railroad right-of-way will be paved to " ' " Y serve as a multi-use trail. The unpaved river trail and smaller ''° ' -.v —r " ' secondary footpaths will provide a different a of trail Y: _ �?� experience. , . w - --` •,,, , ..- ,iii: • i ' ,..4 = , , .•C ;;a� ;{ • *-1.--1, � The marsh is drying up since this photo was taken in 1977.'s'.• :.-1•-ik• l '4.,..,+` ``.- wThe City is studying changes in the drainage in hopes of�• restoring tt�; � `� ,"s;,F ��,,j'''r::�`�•' �':4'���7 �,� ';. and preserving this unique geological feature. 44.4. c; ;or fir,.�,.�f11 f ,fir. ,,t•;. .. ., RENTON CIVIC CENTER -- ' ` ;;r - Recommended Route: Trails are designated along S.2nd,S. •:z -. t'` .• _- wat ;;;;:, 4.`` 3rd,and S.4th Streets,and are bordered between the Burnett i '" ,,:";. : . *j Pedestrian Corridor,and Main Avenue South. F " k, • ' r---., f„,,i,••, may,. ` r {f • Opportunities/Amenities: The location of Renton's Civic `" M ' .4r'4 Center at the City's true geographic center makes it that much more easily accessible to all of its residents. The Civic The Cedar River trails pass through dense forest o mixed Center also contains all of the vital elements of civic center, deciduous and evergreen species.It is of interest year-round city park,and municipal offices within this central core. Constraints: Traffic noise from Maple Valley Highway has Located within walking distance of each other are: a major impact on most of the natural zone areaJ City Hall Carco Theatre Steep and unstable slopes will be a significant factor in how The Public Library The Police Dept. the trail system is developed. Protection and enhancement The Fire Dept. Cedar River Trail of resident plant and animal life will be essential to maintain- Jones Park Senior Center ing an environmental balance as more people are introduced Liberty Park Henry Moses Pool into the area. Cedar River Park Parks&Recreation Dept. Community Center Renton Area Multi-Service Feasibility:Master Planning has already been completed for Center the trail system. The acquisition of the railroad right-of-way is highly probable. King County has set aside funds to Within Renton's Civic Center trail segments will be late- ; purchase the right-of-way. The City of Renton already owns grated forming a web of connecting trails leading to the civic the property or has secured easements sufficient to provide center. Pedestrian trails feeding directly into the center are: for a continuous trail system from the Civic Center to the Cedar River,Cedar Crest,Burnett,Lake Youngs Waterline, eastern city limits at Jones Road. King County, plans to Empire Ridge,and Lake Washington Trails. The CBD will extend the trail farther east towards Black Diamond. act as a connecting trail head for other trails, such as the Black River Trail which will enter the CBD from the east Taken in its entirety,the Cedar River system will beRenton's along the railroad right of way. In the CBD direct connec- premier trail and as such it should be accessed by other trails tions are made to the Cedar River Trail. The Cedar Crest in the system. In some cases access will only bel,possible Trail will pass through Cedar River Park,crossing the river through the acquisition of combined trail and utility ease- and then connecting to the Cedar River Trail. The new I-405 ments,primarily from Puget and Bonneville Power Compa- realignment will produce road and pedestrian bridges to nies. Renton Ave.S.and Cedar Ave S. 34L City Wide Master Trails Plan 111.1t!' ' ./ tr ' .ai, t . -`, 1.,. ;• 11 ,• ' 7 _sllyt. -i .•'` • jam �La • pa. 1l ter : . _,.{",' , - iie am., -_ .fit:. 41 _ • , >1' _T •� • pia . . �1 {?rye�•r.�L • f 1'...tom• y - • •�!• .V. _ • v \�-` � . -{,_ _ tit4: ,4 y '�!i'• �i0.t.•}� ` +' , . t. y. ' ♦ `. -x �r r� �+"�• - ,•w.- It , .,�.r 7 t r, t ,, + ' . 'r1%4� fk? 'Jet'. Sidewalks exist either in isolated pockets or are missing critical links throughout the Civic Center.In order to access the south side of S.3rd Sr. to the Community Center and Cedar River Park a pedP.strian has to cross many blocks and obstacles to get to a safe route along the north side of Houser Way. The majority instead,choose to follow a more convenient route,even though it lacks safe and pleasant conditions. Constraints: Continuity is the element most severely lack- limited space. There may not be sufficient right-of-way to ing in serving the pedestrians needs in the CBD. Sidewalks allow for the rise of the Cedar River during high precipita- exist either in isolated pockets or are missing critical links. tion months. There needs to be a means of safely reaching the Renton Area Multi-service center from both sides of Mill Avenue. Feasibility:Although the downtown environment is at times Houser Way should also be pedestrianized so that people hostile towards pedestrians,the feasibility of developing an can safely cross it from both sides of Mill Avenue. improved pedestrian trail system throughout the Civic Center is high in light of city expansion plans and new efforts to new The intersection of S.2nd Street and Main Street needs to be efforts to revitalize Renton's CBD. improved for pedestrians. The crosswalk is in an awkward place,forcing people to have to walk back a half a block to cross the street. The traffic light control box is placed in the middle of the sidewalk at this busy intersection. LAKE YOUNGS WATERLINE TRAIL Along S.2nd St.the main pedestrian flow is in and out of City Recommended Route: The Lake Youngs Waterline Trail Hall.Consequently, there needs to be a continuous pedes- follows the Seattle Waterline right-of-way southeasterly trian trail along the north side of S.2nd Street and along the from the base of Renton Hill to Lake Youngs.The waterline south side of S.3rd.Street. branches off into three different lines at the southeast corner - of the Tiffany Park neighborhood (S.E. 158th Pl.). The Continuation of the Cedar River Trail under the library will branch extending to the west becomes the Cascade Water- be difficult because of the steeply sloped banks and very line.The north-south branch that forks off at approximately .35 1 City Wide Master Trails Plan S.E. 160th St.proceeds northeast through the Cedar River variety of recreational uses without user conflicts. This Natural Zone to the Cedar River. The main trunk line capacity enables development of a mixed use trail which can extends northwest to the CBD. I be utilized by pedestrians,mountain bicyclists,and equestri- ans. Opportunities/Amenities: The Lake Youngs Trail will link the Lake Youngs Watershed,Philip Arnold Park,the Cas- There are panoramic views of the valley and the city from cade and Bonneville Trails. Renton Hill. Neighborhoods served: Fairwo od,ood, Cascade, Tiffany Park, Constraints: The open area that contains Puget Power and and Maplewood. Bonneville Power lines is not aesthetically pleasing because it contains make-shift or poorly maintained barricades. Its Presently a trail exists around the circumference of the clear-cut landscape stands in sharp contrast to the greenbelts watershed. It would be logical to extend this trail northwest that border other powerline boundaries. along the course of the waterline to Renton and Mercer ' Island. Because the trail presently passes through residential back- yards privacy may be an issue. However,a carefully selected The waterline passes through many residential neighbor- landscape treatment can act as a buffer for the residences that hoods and consequently,is already used by joggers,children, abut the right-of--way. seniors,and hiking groups. Because the right-of--way is so wide(100 feet south of Tiffany Park)it lends itself to a wide The steep grade up Renton Hill will require special treat- ment in order that this trail be arrpcsible to as many Renton I 1 residents as possible.. $' ',:r a .y, --f The waterline traverses two areas with extremely steep slopes. '' ,, _,.a The first and steepest occurs as the pipeline descends from 1 -`" ,�� pes p'pe ..r - >:, xx 116th Place SE to the level area where the Bonneville pow- �� `.:,, erlines cross the pipeline right-of--way. This area is so steep z,„ .' that it will require a combination of stairs and switchbacks in °- i `' �^- ,-- order to make it a viable trail route. +� ,+ r. Wit•""" t v7 ai i ?'k3 x w ' ' z '~ '.. 1 The second steep slope occurs where the pipeline right-of- '4" ;`ry•`'� %`+ A n way drops down to the river. It is currently walkable, but Ay- r --, )s: "' would need improvements in the form of rest areas so it could r xr*---x• �;..-Y ,J_'k'-`• r % * " ,_�✓ j' be taken in stages. 'ti r 4. .. �.* -• ."t- 4 Feasibility:. '� '4 The section from 116th S.E.to the branch with I }ten the Mercer Island Pipeline is in unincorporated King Co - "f.•:� 1 ...+iw-,- 'r3 ,, -:Ti w d` -i+ '.. •: •, :Srrj a-`''nr-'•^vsaq •: -'`'-';'n•.Wttnty. Y<X z" _ .'tea%;o w , • 1444 ;, ?r,w:ay _ � �t ": �y., • • .. :.• 'x'-' - - - I. % i •- ` I' .g : ". �4".4 . :y , ,... � •r,. Y' ',S" < a>3. +'.M . ;• IliE :.s• x•:r+.- <�v...:• ,ye�tt• 4 • • Waterlines provide an excellent opportunity for trail development, The Lake Youngs Waterline passes through extensive greenbelt areas,and is also close or adjacent to major residential areas. .36 . ; City Wide Master Trails Plan ' However, its close connection to the city trails make it a Constraints: The right-of-way passes between private back- natural route to follow. Furthermore,there are proposals yards which raises some privacy issues. While some residents being considered that would annex this area along with the have built fences along the right of way,many include gates Fairwood area into the city of Renton. out to the waterline which seems to indicate that these homeowners view the right-of-way as an amenity rather than The gates need to be more aesthetically designed to help give a liability. the appearance of a park-like facility. The section of the waterline from Benson Rd.S.E.is fairly The Seattle Waterline right-of-way needs carefully selected flat and easily walkable. However, some sections farther landscaping treatment to act as a buffer for the residences west,such as the descent from Talbot Hill to the Panther that abut the right-of-waywith their backyards.Landscaping Creek Wetland are extremely steep, necessitating stairs to should also be considered as a way to narrow the overly wide negotiate. The grade is also quite steep through the Victoria 1 scale of the right-of-way. However,such plantings must not Hills Planned Unit Development (PUD). This would re- interfere with either the operation nor maintenance of the quire switchbacks or stairs. right-of-way. , Traffic and pedestrian safety will be an issue where this trail r' :J % crosses 116th S.E., Benson Rd. and SR 167. Fortunately, ����i. .? '-i :r•: "�''' there is an overcrossing where the trail intersects the new IV'.. t :;z�•' -, Benson Dr.S.E. s::,. F ;„"•i=f" • y . • Some homes utilize the right-of-way as their drive way. (The -",, ti. ,--.: y,: ;, waterline is an easement through their private property.) ; , s� •_• " •` , '`` However,for these few instances the waterline is wide enough !_ . -- A': ;` . '''--* • •' +y to be able to accommodate water,parking,and pedestrian :`ft'. - 1 needs. -- mat,.......,� • This waterline has become a popular jogging route and is used by the school track teams for cross country training. 6 THE CASCADE TRAIL . e I - z Recommended Route: The Cascade'hail follows the east- __ _• c E ' west fork of the Seattle Waterline right-of-way from the - _- O1- ,, G Lake Youngs Waterline Trail,across the eastern slope of the j r -. ->� ° D Green River Valley,to the Springbrook TraiL = - %r , ' ? ' - c Opportunities/Amenities:The Cascade Trail would provide 7i. - _ ;___-/' e the only separated continuous east-west trail across the City, � x �. o- " south of I-4t?5. JP . .,,,. �. Neighborhoods and schools served: Fanwood West,Cas- �h^� "� - `� Q. r� cade,Victoria Hills,and Victoria Park;Nelson Middle School, and Cascade Elementary School. •i• • 4hW.r�„, � • •A w ••T w.Wt This trail will access Tom Teasdale Park, Panther Creek Wetland,the P-9 and P-1 Drainage Channels,and the King County park land just west of 126th Ave. S.E. It will also This major east-west waterline is close to Fait-wood West, provide connections to the Lake Youngs Waterline,Panther Creek Wetland, Springbrook Wetland, Interurban, and Cascade, Victoria Hills and Victoria Park neighborhoods proposed P-1 Channel Trails. and a popular trail route. .37 City Wide Master Trails Plan Feasibility: Feasibility is dependent upon cooperation with Opportunities/Amenities:This mixed-use trail along a sepa- the Seattle Water Department. It seems very likely however, rated right-of-way will provide a major north-south passage since trail use is compatible with waterline operations. through Renton's Green River Valley. This area is in the Furthermore, trail developments would require very little process of becoming a thriving office,scientific research,and changes or improvements to the existing waterline right-of- industrial park complex. way. The Springbrook Creek Trail is a wetland trail,which is rich Trail development would also require cooperation from the in birdlife and distinctive vegetation. The flat high banks Washington State Department of Transportation)(WSDOT), lend themselves well to trail development. where the trail must cross SR 167. __ The trail will connect with the P-1 Channel Trail,the Cas- The very steep sections of the trail that will require stairs to cade Trail (which is the major east-west trail across the negotiate may have to be phased over time because of the southern half of the city),and the Black River Trail. • expense involved. Constraints: While the Green River Valley is still in a relatively low state of development,east west streets such as SPRINGBROOK VALLEY TRAIL S.W.16th,S.W.34th,and S.W.41st Streets,which cross the Springbrook,do not yet pose a major threat to safety. However, as the industrial and commercial development in the Valley Recommended Route: This trail follows the course of the increases(the same development that may help finance the Springbrook Creek from the city limits at S.W.431rd St.north construction of the Springbrook Trail),traffic will increase. to the Black River Riparian Forest. Consequently,pedestrian crosswalks or traffic lights must be Vpi.;,.4..1"..:. . • %y' ..�a •.•+, z " y '1 „G, = '-_ •, . • ;. :y..'. I •• jai, 1.. 11 •: rY - tom. - •:s .•i• _ ,'*- ' o ,.n a 'e ..y y,-4,. tfy .ssr •"'r:,t i'.'1 • -4,". ,'-. 1 . ;.vim, ..'. :. r " ,:�: , 4 •rf • g E ,,-,:.E 4." �y 'A fojr: .i • era x �� r. , t zw 4— fat «} t .7-s P ! �µ - t,� • ��� ' • ; ♦ i«+r'`4 ski f r L a, „s {, - _r+. r ` a. 4 -.4F i t� . f! 1 • !?Sri. ... t, '` ,' f ✓ } a �` •� y �. 14 a z. SdT . .:. k< 31z` t;;!_ , I/( �•�;f r„ !. yy%,- z i �yy. • co.,1 if ►.:'lz.,4,, 't..-Y J N' II ..4 , 1,0 FI The extension of the Springbrook Creek trail will pass through this tranquil and picturesque setting. 1 1 3$, 1 1 City Wide Master Trails Plan This project has been included in the 1989 King County Open Space Bond Issue as a joint project between Tukwila, Kent,Renton,Auburn,and King County--with the County • acting as the lead agent. I ^mfT _ _-- --- t-- — BLACK RIVER TRAIL �-Tfr-tt,�,y„tor - 'Ld1 r �� T 44► a r'� Recommended Route: The trail originates from the CBD 9 • ; / "�j1 �" following S.4th St westbound to Smithers Ave.S.,then jogs ` 1 over to S.4th P1.where it continues westbound for another ,,� :Lqk / block to Rainier Ave.,across from the Renton Center. The 1M ' ( - F `I,,Q .,3 iI Black River corridor continues behind the shopping center, itii • ' extending through the Black River Riparian Forest to Mon- • 1 ' , Ikr ll. ( ,t� , ster Road. L , Iwo '►`''u „„,„..L. Opportunities/Amenities:This wetland area is comprised of '` a unique vegetative complex'of emergent, shrub, and old growth hardwood species. Worth noting is a stand of old growth Oregon Ash and cottonwood. The northern section of the trail has a more mixed character which inchuiiPc the Metro treatment facility and office parks. The Riparian Forest, rich in birdlife, is associated with a combined storm water detention and wildlife pond,which is provided at these intersections to ensure pedestrian safety. known as the forebay pond. There is an island within this pond which supports a productive heron rookery.The rook- Feasibility: Feasibility is high.A section of the trail already ery,portions of the forest,and selected wetland pockets are exists between S.W.43rd and S.W.34th Street Continuation presently preserved as sensitive habitat of the Springbrook Trail can be accomplished through miti- gation measures tied to development. This area holds great educational value,especially since it is located so close to growing residential and employment cen- ters. INTERURBAN TRAIL Although commercial development threatens to encroach upon this area, if it carried out carefully and sensitively, This proposed mixed use trail lies within the jurisdictions of some limited development could provide a vehicle for trail Seattle,Tukwila,Kent,and Auburn. It will follow the aban- development as well. doned course of the Interurban Electric Railroad,which ran during the early part of the twentieth century. The trail will Constraints:The site has been considered for office park extend north-south along the east side of the Green River. development for many years. Portions have already been The trailhead will be located around Fort Dent Park and will developed;others are still under consideration. continue south through Auburn. Feasibility: Although this area is already'planned for office In addition to its historic significance,this trail has regional park development,combined economic and environmental importance as additional sections exist or have been slated factors may prevent this from occurring and consequently, for construction in Snohomish,King,and Whatcom Coun- the Black River forest may be preserved as public open ties. As segments of the trail are locally constructed, the space. Interurban will increase in regional significance. The present 600-foot protective buffer zone surrounding Development of the Springbrook, Cascade Waterline,and the rookery precludes trail development within this area. Black River Trails will provide access between Renton,and Final determination on these limits is still pending. Tukwila,especially for non-motorized travelers. Addition- ally,the City of Tukwila is planning to improve the S.180th Street bridge over the Green River for pedestrians and cyclists. J.? City Wide Master Trails Plan . •'`" + .--- ._ r h N' .. . _,�. • - . • • .,.47.F" .•: ,, • ;! , ~ 1 r 'i, L :F`"tea• ,0t','.i's-.{ • , li Shown here is the forebay feeding pond,shrub/scrub vegetation,and forested slopes of the Empire Ridge. BURNETT TRAIL From S. 2nd to S.5th Street,Burnett is presently a linear parking lot, which needs to be improved for pedestrians. From S.5th Street to its terminus at S.7th Street,Burnett Recommended Route: The Burnett Trail will extend from the Cedar River Trail southbound,through downtown Renton, exists as a linear park. to adjacent residences,terminating at S.7th Street. Opportunities/Amenities: This linear public space offers an ' : •: • .`. ,� opportunity to extend the Burnett Linear Park concept At. •i - along the entire corridor. Burnett is anchored at each end by •' ;,# ,.. the natural amenities of the Cedar River to the north and f '%t, -•`. ': "i, Burnett Linear Park to the south. These features should be -• • integrated rather than separated by parking lots with mini- - -� - -�;�Q mal landscape treatments or other pedestrian amenities. - T • �- i. = Once completed,the Burnett Trail would exist as a continu- ? - .i`t r. ous linear park. t ._.� . • The pedestrian Corridor offers river access and picnicking '- ....c;, opportunities. Tonkin Park is located on the Burnett corridor adjacent to • the railroad line between S.4th Street and Williams Avenue- - �idr Burnett provides access to the Cedar River Trail City Wide Master Trails Plan Burnett Linear Park,located between S.5th St.and S.7th St. PUGET POWER SUNSET TRAIL contains play equipment,picnic tables,and benches. Constraints: Traffic,noise, and air pollution compromise Recommended Route: The trail will follow the Puget Power the trail quality of Burnett. Also, because of the large, right-of-way and will extend from the Cedar River Crest'hail relatively unlandscaped parking areas,the aesthetic experi- north to Park Avenue,just east of the Park Avenue off ramp ence deteriorates in the Central Business District area. from northbound I-405. Feasibility: The Burnett Trail,specifically between S. 2nd Opportunities/Amenities: The Puget Power Sunset Trail and S.5th, needs to be upgraded to provide a more consis- passes through an extensive greenbelt from Sunset Blvd. tent and high quality pedestrian experience along its entire northward to N.E.Park Drive. This greenbelt is comprised length. There should be more of a balance between pedes- of Puget Power and Washington State Department of Trans- trian and parking needs. Current design favors the automo- portation right-of-way. bile significantly over the pedestrian. The Park Ave. crossing at the northern terminus of the Parking needs for the downtown are probably the most proposed powerline trail has been pedestrianized. important factor to consider as new designs are proposed for Burnett. Efforts to revitalize downtown will provide an The southern terminus at the Cedar Crest Trail offers pano- opportunity to consider uses for this corridor. ramic views east toward Maple Valley. Neighborhoods served: Monterey Terrace, Windsor Hills, and the Highlands neighborhoods. + .- •1 , Windsor Hills Park is located within one block of the trail. -'4141, ar"4 • !i *: :, Gene Coulon Park and the Lake Washington Trail are • 'tti 't'%ik • :in•t.. _4 '` t '`.�.,' located close to the northern terminus of the Puget Power .pay +�,••, T•:f, itx: .�• t*N••°'-•• �•. J. f +'';.;' t?p.' -_K:'.,..';". .- ',' ;.> ;,.._ • •. 4 . ; .4,t,,• ; Sunset Trail. This trail would provide a necessary non- , - }:"" y• ., •" e• motorized route to Gene Coulon Park from the Highlands. t -l n..=p� :"'�► '``•h ;^=; r b.= " 'I Constraints: This trail exists in its entirety along the Puget -=� � x sF ""t i• *"`s «g -�' .i sk Power right-of-way. The effects of exposure to high tension ." .i-� '" +- �.' r a r ;�y: � tr '; :i wires is an environmental health issue presently being re- - 4 . .r•'•c. . �.;. 4' searched. v. le, :• fit.-= "7 F,•t sf ..n. .,3Y. y i �!! x{4: fl'.E.it• iK''"fe'<. `w!c':��-•l�.''L "e�` °�'- ;!• .c Tr,;�,,. „�"_,.-: ��.`� , "'�`' � - , .i I�L•+ ;4,?,, ice--^ :t ,, -42 "f •- •4 ':t. 1 ..i' t. .1 ♦ 4- _r,l ,' .� ` ^�•-W;..• h.�.eL Gift;+IZ'! �•: "�. -a. i+•`,..- ▪ .if • it ''" • -�• tsr*=,-'a"' j" ,�f. � . .`: r ':•.e y,, F. '..zi,.:: rt • v.,e) ,,-...- . :7;. , ••,gz�,•6-1.i)°j..t -,,;:i? ,aY•-: �;,,! ,•l.. �- ,i sit 1 •",- _ •.2�{T •a .��3, a^. ..,�' »'.!LR"•".y.j�, _`�J35'R•..ai' * d • t s•. s'" --4 ' -�- ',• •, �' • _ t� ^•Y' • ,ty�,,s+ t y7�.I/ s v'�r +' • tT• H +"lam i o ': 1 • [• i 4r* ! ," - Y �. .� rt4k, t !t_.• '" •-:,• - .mow. `�'_• ,� '•,j*••4.`f .f fi 4 r�{ : `r • l ▪ • cam $:4, - �.c. irir p `.a �,s.' ', 'Kt W t• !`y•v i-,..-•,-,- . - i _ ... ' • awe• �li, T t` . '"i �}' ek The Puget power line passes through a dense deciduous forest and could provide a major separated north-south trail for pedestrians. • IIl City Wide Master Trails Plan The trail must cross 3rd Ave., Bronson, and Sunset Blvd. MINOR TRAILS before it reaches Lake Washington Boulevard. Traffic con- trol for safe pedestrian crossing will be an issue at these three points along the trail where there are no pedestrian cross Minor trails,while smaller in extent than major trails,are no walks. less important.They form the connective tissue that binds the plan and ensures diversity of use and environment. There are some steep sections of the trail whichlwill require special trail construction techniques. HISTORIC PACIFIC COAST Traffic noise is high along most of route. However, the RAILROAD TRAIL greenbelt parallel to I-405 forms a visual barrier that can also serve as psychological buffer against the freeway noise. Recommended Route: This trail will extend along the aban- doned Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way from the vicinity Feasibility: The feasibility of utilizing powerlines right-of- of the Park Ave.I-405 interchange to N.E.24th St. ways for trail purposes requires cooperation from Puget Power,who has cooperated with other jurisdictions to create Opportunities/Amenities: Access to the right-of-way could trail opportunities be gained from the Lake Washington Trail and from the Kennydale neighborhood. Residential development has been planned for the large undeveloped area south of N.E.4th Street. Additional trail The right-of-way passes through the Ocnsely wooded bluffs opportunities can accompany the large Lexington Ridge that rise up from the lake above Gene Coulon Beach Park. development proposal will improve the feasibility of build- Various points along the route offer panoramic views out to ing the Puget Power Sunset Trail. Lake Washington,the Olympic Mountains,the boardwalks, beaches,and architectural details that abound at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. CHRISTIANSON TRAIL The right-of-way alternates between sections of cut and fill. This scenic trail,located within the City of Tukwila's jurisdic- Mature trees tower above narrow cuts through the hillside. tion,follows the west bank of the Green River,between S. These cuts open up to areas,of fill where the trail is elevated Glacier St. and the Tukwila Parkway. Tukwila plans to above steeply sloping banks. A trail utilizing the historic extend the Christianson Trail to Fort Dent Park and the railroad corridor could provide a heightened sense of the County's proposed extension of the Green River Trail. area's steep topography,as well as a better appreciation for turn of the century railroad construction. • • Much of the right-of-way is already flat because of its original : .i• afr, development as a railroad corridor.Despite the steep terrain • ►��> �, typical of the surrounding area,an unpaved trail along this 61 route would be relatively easy to construct. r; The area appears to have a substantial wildlife population as ;• �, , _ 'r evidenced by the animal trail system and the sighting of wolf - -• and coyote bya number ofpeople familiar tom: ''� �' • Y with the area. =• s r • 4; N.E.24th Street has potential to serve as a connector to the - `= Y `" Lake Washington Trail. The Christianson Trailf the course ofthe Green River follows Constraints:Residential development is imminent.The site and offers dramatic views of Mt.Rainier. has long been considered as having potential for multi- family housing. SOOS CREEK TRAIL Feasibility: The right-of-way after years of abandonment is in private ownership and if it remains so a trail easement See description in bicycle trails section. could be a condition of development. The Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way has historic significance in Renton's 11z City Wide Master Trails Plan . 1 .: ': : , i 111 . . (A ' . , //pi ,.._. i: 8. • , , ,,, . •'� J1Ai1tL :2.': ;�' / , / ky oNi, i .t i 1 1\ . / Ait . .t... ..,41,, ,41;,,,,,,, A. • *-\ - . \ - ' 4' - ..„ .._. ,, , . , , , , ,. . . , . 0,. ...:.,-. ..:•7.....:•„2.,:.. ..,./...,-,.--- -->k...,. , 1 • . N. I./'-- .. ''''. *:. jr1,14-':: jor00.,;...•..e.rt",;11.,:, . gif..,),,,..j.,-1 0414 ..-,- , t. l: iii; . --;," ,.., i- 11 , .-1-. ..!..,("14 ,„:: „IL --- . , , `,,, , , inn s, ',l'►� llh'�,I,. ''i i1' , z.-,, ` 0)0, -'•; ••••,.. 'k tA..41Y•••,Z i.., ; '. ''' • . . , II,/ ri .:‘,. . , , -tit, .gti, /,--.,; • • , • ni ....,1 The Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way alternates between sections of cut and fill Mature trees tower above narrow cuts through the hillside. These cuts open up to areas of fill where the trail is elevated above steeply sloping banks. These provide panoramic views of the lake and mountains. , / I , . (., / .' t. ► � / i i ,, ���' lil, , ! • � r • v i, \ ;, ).,1 J (// ,. r\l, ,r7-1/ • k . t if . . .', , .. i ./ 4 sif i ',//11' i n., 1, . . 144 A . \i' . \I i ' ).;1. I' I P . i t.I. . • $/ •11'1)1. ,t ,\` ��- I 1 '��' ..' •�.I��, '�I�I 11 ♦ \ I' _ :A_ ...__---17- _2-I, 1• r. ' vlifi �Pd• • II .;r y .. • \- /, --ir I ,l!te •••••4i , 1# 11 I tel. • '' cZ 1 i IV \ °1 \ tifitt .". I • A pi, 'or . . . ' 6,1 ' ,!I ,V is.,,t‘, I, , 'y , \L -,,. , 1111), \ i• •. on 4 13 1 ` City Wide Master Trails Plan ,_ economic development. The City should designate the -;-:• ! . : '4';J°•'111;:° •r. �* • ,'l i :' remaining portion of the right-of-way that lies within this r: ,. ' `-_- . r greenbelt as a historical landmark. ,i,'�-: . . -• '. r�� • ', KENNYDALE CREEK TRAIL ��Cj -.,. ,, ,, .:; s.. .1e, ..�,',; lr i..•_ -.'t3-; :' ; ,gyp.'• r, ,;; .r�,_.. ` �, Recommended Route:This trail begins at Kennydale Creek •°., , off of Lake Washington Blvd.and proceeds southeasterl 9 i ^�+ r= ` "' _4 14.'"�i.. s..$."�'��. .,. me^,(µ•r.. a�L•:t .1. 7:,.ai i along the utility right-of-way with a possible connection to '`w: •*�""t - �'-rys�.z':,;,��r,� �-' ;�' I the Pacific Coast Railroad Trail. �x:9{���.r' • •..:, ��0.�y,. 't��'�'��:- Trail will '•'°' • -a,N,: ;;. :,s.,...;,- Opportunities/Amenities: The Kennydale CreelL `'� .: • provide access through the Lake Washington greenbelt.An Y�4,.,i4,4,: • :`jj •, +:'-ray `",:y . +f' :, I `..icrP+?s,,`1:::;. '3;..^, ,,,:..-...',1 :.:+' f.-ter., •.7+1 n• additional open space amenity will be offered sufficient `':;;:. ♦`'- -- '- ; +• :!•:` •'' ` '`•'i'Y•-''„ right-of--way along the creek can be secured. Reclamation yo, . ' +"�, ,..;reF.K.„";, �', ' 3aio, ::y. `; I efforts could restore the creek in those areas where it has : :' ;s ' ~:-' t �' -":•-•: 'pi``+ ' been artificially altered. Thistype of �: - . .=7,..t`;� r 4:�• ,w-,�'--p" ,sl r,; restoration was sue- 44: �;."; .rr.., , *y,":- 44 A.42:'4-4-, cessfullycarried out in the lower section of Kennydale ;,: ,f • .� j Creek,where it passes through Gene Coulon Pak+ ,C ` •<"'� ,•=i' , ^`, Restoration and recreational development •_ �~� �4 * .!•i along Kennydale •` : i �!(444 ...1.41. t}x�.ti;4- :::;.1:: ��F •`. c Creek could provide an excellent educational resource. 'a ,`•,,,.... ';-,� 4,p��x _ � . •,,. r:' •f �' People could walk along the creek from its source down to '" .w;:,•,,,.44• '`• ° -tr=_,,. t ' "``1:. :-4. j! I f-'_ ?•.q1 :::::';N'V.!. "r4•'�• v.. •*,i• • v.:!4. Ili'+.irrx i its mouth at Lake Washington in Gene Coulon!ark. En- route they could learn about wetland restoration effort . NI- through interpretive signage. . ` :.;? '+ .:1;:;A,....- -. 1 , If a connection can be made to the Pacific Coas}ryI `' ,;,-' ; '--.'•; I' 4., ' • -.sSe. .y I Railroad .ICY �' I • .'V� •_' i r'•,. Trail,.a loop can be formed utilizing the Kennydale Creek, :.�t. 4. - 0"-:..1'-t'=i .,„• s,; `'` • TS Pacific Coast Railroad, ''_' "'" -�` '`and Lake Washington Trails. •,it• • �. C �Y �• s -9- -- Constraints:The grade is steep up to 'W ' ,I '.. `.• : t i -_7. 4"i-.=r the Pacific Coast '� 4 • t* �•.,,,.. I-•�._ .,,.• + Railroad right-of-way, requiring switchbacks to connect s. . j /='14 with the proposed trail. �•.'::.'F`c.- �:;/r: it = ,; %..1 • % . /4: 11. ..'r1 The trail route and the creek are in private ownership. ;•: -,4a` i,: Presently the utility easement is dedicated to the City of ' • •- ti -' t i��; .:z;`r r ��„u , �.! ► fi_- Renton for that purpose only. I 4,s' '" - - ' .'- 'k r ,,"f . • Feasibility: The Kennydale Creek Trail is feasible spatially �� -�` R, ' - ' c , `t . and environmentally. However, property owners would '4,--,; - *,' • ,. • • : ,'� have to consent to grantinga recreational easement along '" ie . ` �' wk' = '>*°s" the creek and an additional trail easement along the utility •3-'cc.;,- -r►,. -', F right-of-way • , " '•for trail usage. Owners are sometimes more �' , - �,'� ,.. '� resistant to granting a trail easement than toll a utility .. ,,•• t' ''.?4 `'•: '" 4 , t • : easement because they are fearful ofstrangersentering'their N--.• +y . •,.. .' t. J t • i property. However,fencing and/or planting screens could % :.t-•` `;` t ,b3,1�. be effectively utilized to maintain privacy. ��' !',•e: 4:, l,* ' ' - . ... . t`, ' ,' ' y ',- ,' The upper photo shows Kennydale Creek east of Lake Washington Boulevard,as it passes through the remaining greenbelt above. The lower photo shows the restored Kennydale Creek as it passes through Gene Coulon on route • . out to Lake Washington. T1• 1 , City Wide Master Trails Plan DEVIL'S ELBOW �^ •'. Recommended Route: The route traverses the city east-west ",�, 1 n-ti 3a:`.' " i :,_:-;-1, !;;"` `:r, :.gip • lr•t.. }. • from its western terminus at Lake Washington Blvd., pro- x;,r;-s.= ;�"W'° .(`' ' tr,' `. ing eastward along N. 30th,Kennewick,N.E. 27th,on ' .1 • `�:;,. ,•'`L'':"` , teed .� Fs,>:;�`�:::.. ' the road known as the Devil's Elbow to S.E.96th St.,and - - -.; K then to Coal Creek Parkway, outside of the eastern city `�, x„k 1 t limits. Opportunities/Amenities:,1 '1 This is a mixed suburban and , natural trail. hi i F :: 1i � ( ' ..„; 1. ;3� w Fro. J+. ..- � 4 •1:it Neighborhoods served: West Kennydale,East Kennydale,• . , t , North Highlands,Glencoe,Sierra Heights,and May Valley. • `�n�- x` , The relative wilderness quality of the May Creek and Honey N.E.30th,the main east-west arterial provides a bridge for Creek Greenbelts which form the Devil's Elbow represent a pedestrian access across I-405.It lacks continuous sidewalks I great natural treasure nestled in the heart of the city. The however. trail-passes through a lush verdant greenbelt,filled with the _ sound of birds and the rushing creeks. During the summer • ti,,,', i A. months the density of the vegetation is so thick that the . - '. ". . . ._ ..;. residences which surround the area are not visible from '►_14 , f "4-`- , •r- #• Devil's Elbow Rd. � ' l. t•*, v. �:fr., • mC F - - _- -ti' ;,.+w, 1!Aj. f 'tt • .. • to - • -�. Constraints:The steep unstable slopes have made it impos- : .: ►. ;., , . ..';, •,; sible over the last several years to maintain the roadway .-l. • ,};:.I.' . `" through the Devil's Elbow.Even though the road has proved ; �� 4 � 't ac, , ':r .. incapable of sustaining auto and truck traffic because of A 'l` ' r:r -'T ii j'K� J - • : ••-- unstable slopes and soil conditions, it could sustain non- :_='. 4';r,�' .��-�!' -�-•-•r1;..-•�;,,,;,:.9f motorized transportation which does not subject the road to r• i "i _ = - •- . • ••• - the same weight pressures and vibration. Nonetheless,there is increased pressure to reopen the road ` ^- iic-� to car traffic because the Devil's Elbow route provides the 4--- ' ' only direct east-west route across the city north of Sunset The Devil's Elbow Road passes through a dense canopy of ' Blvd.. In addition to the obvious safety problems,opening deciduous trees. This area provides a pleasant pedestrian the road to automobile traffic would not only compromise experience throughout the year. the trail experience for pedestrians, but would encourage 1 further residential development within this greenbelt. Trail is the preferred route to connect with the Union Trail. Feasibility: The development of Devil's Elbow as a pedes- The Seattle Waterline crosses the Devil's Elbow Trail at S.E. trian trail route depends on the permanent closure of the 96th Ave. roadway to motorized traffic.This condition will make it safe for pedestrians and will preserve the tranquility of the area. • , BONNEVILLE TRAIL If the roadway is open to traffic,then its designation as a trail route is questionable.Its narrowness and steep slopes would Recommended Route: The Bonneville Trail follows the , make it extremely costly to build pedestrian facilities in Bonneville Powerline right-of-way from the Cedar River addition to the roadway. Natural Zone to Grant Creek Trail. The county section of the roadway that is open and not in the Opportunities/Amenities: The use of the powerlines pro- . steep slope area lacks paved shoulders and sidewalks. Be- vides access to meadows that are a carpet of colorful wild- cause of this lack of pedestrian facilities,the Honey Creek flowers during the spring and summer months. The area is also rich in birdlife. y City Wide Master Trails Plan - \ i tom' .: 1 ,;,- ::•;, • ^a�',i • 4pV.- ' "t.►. Ley T• / Zj�l' e r7,_ f� i...'l • "• . 5 fi.Qtc,r. +. `'"t?^" _ ,1J,,,. �a • .:r11 i. • -.5 A ;1 P • - 3,1d" �, t,,,lRf <'il'', ,i+v:L. JI B .ro�f.i �.�r aci 1 i The powerlines provide access through dense greenbelts.During the spring and summer months they are a field of colorful wildflowers. • .f ..,h ,..'•�ti ;. ,.. n 1 t rty e' •er 3 Fei 1 ") P � '.� � � .. t" '�.,,�I r 111 c� ��'� 2 i ir�.ti �y •tam > * t .at = ,, �^ AJ' j -cc, l S'` 1 • A 'i. yl +j.t1 : „4- . 5 i _ - i • --. `,.. . : ..? t • ' i M r •• '. i • _ .1 • It. � �, ter. ;.. - I--- 75 ti�• ANyl ,I $ k; ' }t mot, w;� 1 .;'l$C• .� •- 44 City Wide Master Trails Plan r There are presently many foot trails through the right-of- Opportunities/Amenities: Grant Creek Trail is a very pic- way which indicate pedestrian usage. turesque path along the edge of a creek, which passes through a deciduous forest. The area is very colorful during The Bonneville right-of-way provides scenic views of the city the autumn months. The creek and trail provide a pleasant and Green River Valley. amenity for a multi-family residential complex that is lo- ` cated very close to the powerlines. The Bonneville Trail will intersect the C M r River Natural Zone Trail,Lake Youngs Trail,and Grant Creek Trail. Constraints:The grade along I-405 is very steep. Stairs will be required to utilize the state highway right-of-way. Constraints: The large tower structures and high tension - - wires detract visually and audibly from the trail experience. Feasibility: The trail up to I-405 is already in place between However,once underneath the wires,they are actually less Grant Avenue and the base of the slope below I-405. How- noticeable than from a distance.Attention is drawn instead, ever, the steep grade from the creek up to the interstate to the flowers,birds(quail have been sighted),and trees. right-of-way make connections to lower Renton Hill and Lake Youngs Waterline Trail less feasible without the con- i_ There are also topographic constraints. The right-of-way struction of stairs. crosses a large ravine with very steep slopes that will require - bridges,stairs,and/or switchbacks to negotiate. In its pres- ent condition,the terrain is too steep for a public trail. PANTHER CREEK TRAIL _� The potential negative side effects of exposure to high _ tension wires is presently being studied. Recommended Route: The trail will extend through the Panther Creek Wetland which parallels the east side of SR Feasibility:Developing a trail along this powerline right-of- 167,between I-405 and the Valley Medical Center. way requires cooperation with Bonneville Power. Opportunities/Amenities: Panther Creek Wetland pro- Overcoming the constraints imposed by the steep topogra- vides a rich habitat for waterfowl and wildlife. The Panther phy will also influence the feasibility. It is technically pos- Creek Trail would offer human arrpcs into an area of high • sible,but expensive to construct stairs;thus these sections of natural and educational interest. This natural resource is the trail may have to be phased in over time. located close to the Valley Medical Community and resi- dential neighborhoods. i� GRANT CREEK TRAIL Neighborhoods served: Talbot Hill, Victoria Park, and 1_-_ Victoria Hills. Recommended Route: The trail currently follows Grant Creek from the Cascade Trail extending north to I-405.The Development of a Panther Creek Wetland Trail would proposed route will proceed north to lower Renton Hill make an excellent educational facility for interpreting wet- where it will connect with the Lake Youngs Waterline Trail. land habitats and the dynamics of natural storm water r detention. �'"`` - --et: ` " -`'"'_-• s.. :•` ` - t, The trail will also intersect the Cascade Trail,which is the •:q ; _ '; `• i-•-., + major east-west pedestriantrail. • a,, ryT/ �, r• it S �J i ',}- •. j�d R = ... 'ft =ti s- `> - Constraints: Wetlands are sensitive areas,thus trail devel- ` •.jt' opment through Panther Creek must be designed without ):.�.' -� „ s • n disturbing the vegetation or wildlife of this ecosystem. �' •' { ,'` ' >' Consequently,constructing trails through sensitive areas is � -;_�r ...'•t 4.,.; �. ,.c :„;." expensive,in terms of both construction and maintenance. . ,.,...........i........,.-„:„ , .r �- 4 ,:, __ The noise and traffic from SR 167 and I-405 will compro- .¢y; ' � ;jl, . : ., ..,*� mise the experience of the trail,audibly and visually. - -_- -•=e P:'�-r..�_. -"..-. : :-' "_"'; Feasibility:Feasibility is related to coordinating trail devel- The picturesque Grant Creek Trail passes through a opment with storm detention efforts proposed by the Public deciduous forest which is ablaze with color during the fall Works Department. Plans are to dredge the creek in order . Ill City Wide Master Trails Plan to increase retention capacity. It maybe possible at that time to construct major sections of the trail. SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS TRAIL -' : - - " ' - Recommended Route: This trail will extend from the south- em terminus of the Panther Creek Wetland southeast to the : City of Renton Springbrook Watershed. = Opportunities/Amenities: Combined with the Panther Creek t- sa;, _;_�:p i ' _ _�` �s"-rg� Wetlands Trail the Springbrook Wetlands Trail would cre- -- =- -.=j==' '` " ' `, ate a continuous north-south trail from I-405 to the souther Y • ' • :: !;1 j ' - city limits. I ( , !ili 1'_i4 ' vl _ t•: • The proposed trail passes through valuable wetland habitat. The Empire Ridge as viewed from the Black River Wetland. Ponds located along this ridge are rich with birdlife and Constraints:Completion of the trail will require acquisition provide necessary fofod and shelter for the resident wildlife. and/or trail easements from property owners. They also provide windering ground for herons that inhabit the rookery during the spring and summer months. There will also be increased expenses in constructing a trail through sensitive wetland habitat and maintaining the trail EMPIRE RIDGE TRAIL in such a wet area. Extra efforts will have to be made to protect wildlife and vegetation,as well as protecting the trail Recommended Route: The trail will begin at Monster Rd from the deteriorating effects of saturated soilsi and proceed eastward through the steep greenbelt until it Feasibility:Acquiring trail easements from the Springbrook connects with the Black River Trail. Watershed to the wetlands will not be easy,nor will property Opportunities/Amenities: The Empire Ridge Trail will acquisition. meander through a densely wooded area with very steep slopes. Located on the ridge,the trail will offer panoramic views out to the Black River Riparian Forest, the forebay P-1 CHANNEL TRAIL pond, heron rookery, Fort Dent, and parts of the Green River Valley. Recommended Route: The trail will follow the course of the proposed P-1 Drainage Channel from the intersection with Rich birdlife is found in the ponds along the eastern half of the Springbrook Trail at S.W.43rd to the intersection of the the greenbelt. These ponds are associated with the Black Cascade and Springbrook Trails. River Forest riparian ecosystem. Opportunities/Amenities: The P-1.Channel Trail will con- This trail system would serve the extensive residential popu- nect to the City owned wetland located at the present termi- lations of Empire Estates,Sun Pointe,and future develop- - nus of SW 27th Street. This wetland could be developed as ment. a preserve/interpretive facility and could also serve as a trail- • head for the P-1 Channel Trail. With development of the Black River Trail, the Empire Ridge Trail would provide an excellent trail loop experience. The trail will follow the watercourse through its entirety. Constraints: The slopes are very steep,requiring extensive Feasibility: It has not yet been determined whether the P-1 switchbacks. Developing trails along steep terrain can result �r Drainage Channel will be needed for the city's storm water in chronic erosion and maintenance problems. management. However, if it is needed the trail can be incorporated in the initial design. Feasibility: Feasibility will be dependent upon the outcome of negotiations with property owners along the ridge. How- ever,even if trail easements were dedicated,more in depth environmental analysis would be nenessary to determine how the steep saturated soils could support a trail system. 1 L�g . A 1Y 4.v. A 1,'' I S.- -i-CI) \\a,MEH' '' '. .f.% '‘\‘, '' ) \ j k i _ ilir ri..\..,_ i. a, ir, ro ) \ /-) ',I . 8 I . \ ) , q k ,-- --\) J.4y' A i ik y, It \ \I \\-\,, II - w •,%•-Km j 1 �cI �� of 1`• ;� .. COI+ , `- • ; \ t l� `- . -,_ ( " (1�\ .' e'llr'Ili' ML:::11.4.7 `/%' • rA 'Er T,r''v�'JT(t i• . ikr^',' �\.'� .f. ..4 , $ Th';rF•'�r ,` f •',f^ .. .r`GC • _ `4 1' ii\' f"1.,-'"41.) 'Ik t i{ A l •I1E1 , t,l 4�!� \L eft ,` r, �1 �� �� " ` \ / -iI ec V.s.. �•- it /3 \ , • ) IN Mir 01_,-,, ...14,11). •a IV`l 1r r •t .�1 y r/ I it ��\ /V I � I � \OtN.O �11NM \ f � I�.,' lY I, Iy•'. i. '0 ��_t 1.` Ides 1 .�WY�Ftt i p \___/-1\\\\_,\ 2. ‘. J ,, J l z - -�' F ) I r. i _ 1 ,,,-- , ii I tip, . ...../- . , 1 • .....,,........, _.„. iri • 1 • fi 1 0. 'sill!' fit -\ r ii, II °'1 vo,. ,...11',T. _kW kt Est -' �, _ — � air 'C: r� •\ I 1 c 0 L - � ifs °�. , l( M.�• �... •w.f r i•. �,, - kJ , s alr4 �.. �;r'7�r 1' ?i .�. i' • ,`.�. -, 1 �. y�} ` 'r�� �..R,`5 ` S' �7 �,y�h�I�:. � sl:: y '�' -, iii1 I� 1 I\\ ..•s .Ar `-•N grl a, \\ _ i ....-.. • e. A B - !1 •�� � _ •' � I..' t' ( 1 a'rr K,, ,s'sr #R kN S ;'k : � y�i ; �\. .-•rri / `� �'' ,' � �`7 ,'f.• fr.�i+['+:, � �F} j .1111.1!:,.. ., ,,. 1.., „... c ,, ..,..,„ \,.. ',.........._______„` -1.--('—',. ,J �• r • 6 J r, .,, .� If C L�� \ y ;4w•4 \ YY •. j SA40 k 7 av u {!` a. il )1 ,A. • • ••i., Ili ^ Q !. t�� `A Ir IR � \ ,t,.7:, 1 r d •� I ■�1 '► `T9f c ' , \ ,,,, 4, iil B l9H �: A, ir it 11 1 t )48ie. siar ..• "a, \ g —44.11::,-,,,,,;:i ti.d.•2,4 .3„4,,, .,,,g,,,,...., , , s„ 61. ' -31,.....-----). ,1 ,( ' i ( • \t i 1 -lb A :i . i § 1 T All ,--, 1 ‘, --_ - t__ ----____,-----h- / i 1J/ \,_,.f m '4.4 \1/4. T R A I L■ XBY Al P Mae TRAILSt1IIKIB !WIZI. ' I1 �Iiid ,1 A. LAKE WASH]NGTON TRAIL L. DEVIL SDEL TRAIL ( 7 B. DUVALL-COAL CREEK TRAIL N. DEVIL'S ELBOW TRAIL ' . "'• 'SM. 1.00M1 J NOPITH C. SUNSET BYPASS TRAIL N. EDNONDS AVENUE \N.., D. CEDAR RIVER TRAIL O. ABERDEEN AVENUE E. BURNETT TRAIL P. UNION AVENUE P. EARLINGTON TRAIL 9. IJGET TRAIL G. SPR INGBROOU TRAIL B. BENSON TRAIL ()<�O H. INTERURBAN TRAIL S. TALBOT TRAIL M A ,1 O R T RAILS GOO MINOR TRAILS I. RAINIER AVENUE T. P-I CHANNEL I. SW l6TH ST. U. ENPI RE TRAIL K. SW 77TH ST. G(cY 0 CITY OF RENTON BICYCLE MASTER TRAILS PLAN 4. iv ♦ rr •I OLPARTULNI OF PARKS AND RE CREA T ION '�„`\a �lV�O JOHN E. WEBLEY, DIRECTOR �, - I PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES MAJOR TRAILS To access Renton's CBD/Civic Center from the west side of the lake: Major trails are generally large in extent and usually of a significant regional value,and form the backbone of the The trail from Seattle follows the signed bike trails system.They are often multi-use,accommodating both route along Rainier Avenue to the north gate of pedestrians and cyclists. Renton Municipal Airport. From there the trail utilizes Airport Perimeter Road to connect to the Cedar River Trail and the CBD. LAKE WASHINGTON TRAIL . Renton--Newport Hills Route: This minor route connects Renton, Newport Hills, and Bellevue by following Lake Recommended Routes: This trail connects Bellevue,Ren- Washington Blvd. northbound to N.E. 44th Street After ton,and Seattle around the southern half of Lake Washing- one block,turn north back on to Lake Washington Boule- ton. yard which leads to Newport Hills. Lake Washington Loop: This major trail from Bellevue Opportunities/Amenities:The Lake Washington Trail makes follows an existing signed bike route which utilizes Lake a direct connection between major recreational features Washington Blvd. (Bellevue),the existing I-405 Bike Trail, such as: .Newcastle Beach Park,the proposed May Creek Pleasure Point Lane,Ripley Lane,N.E.44th St.,and Lake_ Trailhead,Kennydale Beach Park,Gene Coulon Memorial Washington Blvd. (Renton) to Park Avenue. From this Beach Park,the proposed Pacific Coast Railroad Trail,and point the route will follow either Park Avenue 9r Garden the Cedar River Trail. Avenue southbound to N. 6th St. and then proceed west- ,, 1 �, 3x'. 7 r .;:. X »d, bound until it intersects the Cedar-River Trail. k, x ,,, (Although "" w '�` a'�`''' �•�� ,.F-�;: ��• ;�;x �,, � .�;, , the choice between Park or Garden is still to be. determined '•- :_ F7.`e.» �` :; ,; `� T'�,'- ;µ'"a- 4`'`; from the North Renton Traffic Study,Park Avenue is the = x,. 7. P'a''= = :-.�, recommended route, contingent on its redesi to safely - - .. ',:. 1'': .: ' _;. . accommodate bicycles.) Continue southbound along Cedar ?� River Trail to the bridge which connects with Airport Pe- - " ,.; , rimeter Road. Circle in a clockwise direction around the -> Airport to the north gate on Rainier Avenue`Exit the ' Airport and proceed north on Rainier Ave:S.to follow the ,,, n `-r • • , Yew# h � +ewi7" 3,$4 ...A county-wide Lake Loop to Seattle. x ; ' - - u ,, �,.- To access Renton's CBD/Civic Center from the east side of k' .. ' " '` `` ` the lake: Lake Washington Blvd offers dramatic views to Lake Wash- ington,Gene Coulon Parr Mt Rainier,and Boeing. Park Avenue Route: Follow Lake Washington Blvd. southbound to Park Avenue. Proceed Neighborhoods served: Factoria,Newport Hills,Hazeldell, southbound along Park to Bronson Way,which North Renton,Kennydale, the Renton CBD,Bryn Mawr, leads to the CBD. and Lakeridge. Garden Avenue Alternative:. Follow Lake Scenic views of Lake Washington, Mercer Island, Seattle, Washington Blvd.to Houser Way,then proceed Gene Coulon Park,the Olympic Mountains,and Mt.Rainier 'south along Houser to N.E.8th,continue wlest to exist along the route. Other points of interest include the ' Garden Avenue N. Then proceed south to Bronson Barbee Lumber Mill and Boeing. Way and the CBD. - - T.'he grade is manageable through its entirety. 4/q City Wide Master Trails Plan 'j t' „r b x 14 t f i'v� .r"' -, '. gr4.„,;; >'••-.( z4 -Y.A. .Ip d P�SF r • .z sf.t.0 ti ' ,, ' -t. 's"7 0.t •, 1" -, .::;-_ ,t tr cs, R j„ '�+`'. , " i 1 f LP-,� a .,,sc ',F-•� ,,9 r ,-i' lam. -,.., '. a i.;:3.. " ti 'a.^-, Y The narrow boulevarr4 which lacks paved shoulders,is presently ...or push them off the road as was the case in this picture. dangerous for cyclists. Without a visible bike lane designating separate territory,many cars feel compelled to either swerve into the oncoming trajj'zc lane to avoid cyclists... The bridge between the Renton Municipal Airport and the Cedar River Trail belongs to Boeing. Complicating ease- ment acquisition is the fact that planes are transported The section of the Lake Washington Trail that parallels across the bridge between the plant and the runway.How- I-405 is very safe because it utilizes either separated right-of- ever,this does not occur very often during the day,so a gate, way along the freeway or residential roads with low traffic like those at a railroad crossing, could be lowered during volumes. these instances. Constraints:Presently Lake Washington Blvd.is dangerous The bike lane along Rainier Ave.simultaneously serves as for cyclists because it has narrow lanes with unimproved - parking strip,forcing cyclists to have to jut out into traffic in shoulders,and poor pavement conditions.While these prob- order to pass wide vehicles parked along the bike lane. lems can be improved,a major constraint involves the lack of continuous buildable right-of-way along Lake Washington Striping of Rainier Ave. within the Renton city limits is Blvd.,which is a road cut that along some sections has been inconsistent. Presently,the bike lane striping does not exist cut into unstable,steeply sloped banks. There is sufficient between the airport and Bryn Mawr(unincorporated King right-of-way in most instances,but efforts to widen certain County). Although many bicyclists enter and exit through sections of the road to provide both a bike lane and pedes- the north gate of the airport,this intersection is still danger- trian trail will be difficult to engineer and, consequently, ous during rush hour times of the day. Consistent striping - expensive to construct. and improved signage within the Renton city,limits will be necessary to correct this situation. During the wanner months,automobile congestion increases due to the Coulon Beach traffic.However,if there were safer provisions for bicyclists along this route,bicycle usek :,,." ', ..-5�. ,�° r �, might � .r�- ,' .�.F'"1/4 , replace some automobile traffic. .= �` S'`4'7.7„ w= :`" ': 1, .' % + The current design of Park Ave.N.discourages safe bicycle :•s.` °. +��;.�. . , movement: J. `r' .- 'ear , ,...•; :,'i r z -�. b There is no shoulder along this highly travelled route. ""k1K • A, Dangerous sewer grates lie in the path of bicycles. «, ,— - The right lane is also serves as a Metro Bus and Boeing Van Pool lane. Consequently,there is keen space competition when buses, cars and , cyclists try to share this lane.This conflict creates . The low traffic volumes and riverside vegetation along Airport a dangerous situation. Perimeter Rd makes this a safe and pleasant route. City Wide Master Trails Plan Feasibility: Feasibility is high if improvements to Lake This route is suburban in character and is relatively well- Washington Blvd.are carried out incrementally over time. maintained. Coal Creek Parkway offers access to the scenic The inclusion of Lake Washington Blvd.Scenic Viewpoint May Valley and Cougar Mountain of the Issaquah Alps. Acquisition and Development, as a starter project in the 1989 Open Space Bond Issue will ensure that some im- This grade is flat through most of Renton.The steepest areas provements will at least be completed within the next three occur within unincorporated King County. years. The positive impact that these projects will have should act as a catalyst for further improvements. Constraints: The route has some steep sections between Renton and Bellevue,notably May and Coal Creek.Increas- The designation of the Lake Loop by King Cotinty as an ing traffic volumes along Coal Creek Parkway and Duvall official regional trail will serve as added impetus;for devel- compromise the trail experience. Although the bike lanes/ opment of Renton's Lake Washington Trail,which is an in- shoulders are wide enough to safely accommodate bicycles, tegral component of the regional system. the rushing traffic may give a heightened perception of danger. The local and regional importance of Lake Washington Blvd. is also heightened by the presence of Gene Coulon Feasibility: Because the full extent of the right-of-way has Memorial Beach Park.The thousands ofparkvisitors,many not yet been utilized,there is still sufficient right-of-way to of whom like to walk and ride their bicycles toj the park, construct bicycle lanes. would greatly benefit from improvements to Lake Washing- ton Boulevard. Additionally, local residents of the Ken- `, ;r;• 'a A' I•,-, nydale neighborhood are very concerned about safety issues • x .t- ++,"2.:• along this section of the Lake Washington Trail! j�y.=r4 .ss''. DUVALL-COAL CREEK TRAIL '>� . ' . ,- 4 , . . =N }. r w t 4 J.^. Recommended Route This north-south trail follows Duvall k ;t M•' , ;F`t. Ave.along the eastern edge of the city.It begins at N.E.4th ,* Sit $ ice'.. 1/ u r t St. and extends north to Coal Creek Parkway,in unincor- `%, L` -� :.:, '..;A'� porated King County. I ' ,7 `O 1 t -' Opportunities/Amenities: This trail offers a direct north- •- < .•a. `` r'1t0,::..1 1! J f - • i south route with an existing striped shoulder. The shoulder The Duvall-Coal Creek Rail provides access to scenic May along Coal Creek Parkway is designated specifically for Valley,which is characterized byhorsefarms,rollinghills and bicycles. However, this designation does not carry over within the Renton city limits. dramatic views of M�Rainier. A` 71 r Future road improvements will favor increased traffic vol- umes.The dangerous intersections of Duvall at Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall at N.E. 4th St. needs to be redesigned to 't ` . I ;�`r accommodate bike lanes. r r < 3 l:. The county section of the bike trail along Coal Creek Park- ' ± 2 > 1 a, , way is already in place.The City of Renton needs to continue the bike lanes within its boundaries. +wr , , � � .i.,3 .•`fit �:,. �:k. SUNSE T TRAIL Recommended Route This route follows Sunset Boulevard Wide shoulders and good pavement conditions make Duvall and Renton-Issaquah Road (SR-900) between downtown Ave.N.E.well suited for bicycle use Renton and Issaquah. However,the section of Sunset Blvd. between Duvall Ave. N.E. and Edmonds Ave. N.E is too 5/ City Wide Master Trails Plan dangerous for cyclists.Thus a Sunset bypass route has been with the automobile in mind. This section of the selected which is descibed separately. road lacks shoulders and has high traffic volumes which move at high speeds. To access the.CBD: From Edmonds Avenue the trail pro- cppds southbound along Sunset Blvd.to N.3rd Pl.to N.4th Numerous curb-cuts that are actively used for St.until it intersects Park Ave.N.The route proceeds south the many businesses along Sunset perforate the along Park to the CBD. For northbound travel,bikes can route. turn directly onto N. 3rd St., which is a one-way street heading eastbound to Sunset. A central turning lane and existing curbs and gutters limit widening the road for any type of To access Boeing, Gene Coulon Park, Lake Washington bike lane without great expense. Trail:The Sunset Trail continues westbound from the inter- section of Sunset and Edmonds Avenues on to N.E. Park Drive,which passes under I-405 onto Park Ave.N.and the Lake Washington Trail. Opportunities/Amenities: The Sunset Trail links the Ren- i '4,t c.r'i •- ton CBD with the Highlands neighborhoods and provides a ;r'. • A direct route to Issaquah. t , 4 East of Duvall,shoulders are wide,generally in good condi- _:• ; ' tion,and well-marked. Also,due to lack of commercial and - • • -. -- residential concentration,there are less curb cuts along the _ "route. There is generally less auto traffic as well,due to the ��" lower population densities in this area. However,this will change as the area develops. .K, '< x • • This wide shoulder/sidewalk along N.E.Park Drive provides i safe passage for westbound cyclists. •',w`-. :.f.',. •� ! " ,;33 ' Feasibility: The development of a bike lane must be skill- - + fully engineered near the freeway ramps. While a challeng- ' 1 ing endeavor, cities such as Eugene, Oregon and Davis, �r -- Imo A.* California have managed to successfully coordinate cars -• -Sr," and bicyclescritical• ...: ,-- at intersections. ;-$i ^,'+� .x; The portion of the Sunset Trail east of Duvall Ave.(Ren- e:4 ton-Issaquah Road)could easily accommodate a bike lane a,``;''Jta✓"4:^"f �^ ' S'.f .•!<i!�►'. - %: due to the relatively undeveloped state of the area and low traffic volumes. West of Duvall Ave N.E. the excess right-of-way has been utilized for a center turn lane, curbs, and sidewalks. Cyclists Accommodating a bike lane along the commercial portion _ seeking safety, take to the sidewalks. This remedy however, of Sunset would require a major reconfiguration of the creates a situation of danger for pedestrians. present lane design,namely the presence of the center turn lane. Removing the center turn lane would hinder the Constraints: Between Duvall Ave.and Edmonds Ave.,the efficient and safe flow of traffic through this major commer- shoulders have been eliminated in favor of car lanes,curbs, cial district. gutters,and sidewalks. Furthermore, because Sunset is such an auto dominated The section of Sunset Blvd N.E.from Duvall Ave.,west to strip,reconfiguring the road to accommodate bicycles would Edmonds Ave.,can not safely accommodate any type of bike require a major adjustment of people's attitudes about the lane for the following reasons: purpose of the road and who it best serves.Consequently,this situation necessitates the creation of a bypass route along This is a busy commercial route,designed purely this section of Sunset Boulevard. City Wide Master Trails Plan SUNSET BYPASS Constraints:The bypass route is more circuitous and thus less appealing than following the more direct route along Recommended Route: The Sunset Bypass Trail offers an Sunset.The bypass also does not provide as easy access to the businesses along Sunset.alternative to the boulevard, the most dangerous sectionHowever,for recreational riding which is between Duvall Ave N.E.and Edmonds Ave N.E. and commuting, the bypass route, which travels through In order to bypass this section turn north off of Sunset/Ren- . residential•neighborhoods,is safer. ton-Issaquah Road on to Duvall Ave N.E. Proceed for The intersection of Monroe Avenue and N.E.4th Street is about one block to N.E.17th Street. Head west on 17th to dangerous for bicyclists because N.E.4th is a major east-west Union Avenue. Follow Union south to N.E. 12th Street. arterial with fast moving automobile traffic. Head west on 12th to Aberdeen Ave. Proceed smith to the intersection with Sunset Boulevard. Feasibility: Presently, a Sunset Bypass route is the-only North Highlands Neighborhood Connector: For access . feasible way to safely travel between central Renton and the into the Highlands neighborhoods and to McKnight Middle eastern city limits at Duvall Ave. School,the bypass route turns north off of N.E. 2th St.on The feasibility is high for developing• Monroe Avenue into a to Edmonds Ave. N.E. This road serves as a spine from bike trail. The street is wide with sufficient right-of-way to which many residential streets connect. safely accommodate automobiles and bicylists. The location • Monroe Connector:Monroe Avenue provides access to the : of the vocational school along this street makes it a logical route to have safe bicycle provisions. Renton Vocational Technical Institute, the King County Public Works Offices/Shops,and the District Court. This arterial serves the densely populated Highlands neighbor- hood.,This feeder route extends south from the Sunset CEDAR RIVER TRAIL Bypass to N.E.4th Street. Recommended Route: Although a trail following the river Opportunities: This route provides a safe alternative to southeast from Lake Washington to Liberty Park is already Sunset Blvd.N.E.which is designed soley for the automo- in existence,it is primarily designed for pedestrians. Mixed bile. use is not encouraged for safety reasons.However at present, theC'Mar River Trail provides the only safe non-motorized The narrow sidewalks can not serve as a safe alternative for route and must be shared by both pedestrians and cyclists. bicyclist due to potential conflicts with pedestri ans. Fur- thermore, the elevated sidewalks are punctuated with , Southeast of the Civic Center the bicycle portion will occupy numerous curb cuts through which cars pass in an out of,in the Burlington-Northern Railroad right-of-way between Cedar this busy commercial district. River and Maple Valley Highway. The bike trail will extend past the Maplewood Golf Course to the new Renton city limits at Jones Road. Beyond the city limits,King County 44: �. r .' ' plans to continue the paved trail to Black Diamond. • ,` < 1. 7t ;: ''� ?' Opportunities/Amenities: This route connects the rapidly J • growing Maple Valley and points east with Renton. It will .`- �,, ,R �- �. +.fir :a• • provide a necessary alternative to traveling the dangerous r.• • r.. x 'i. Maple Valley Highway, which has high volumes of fast .., : . •,:4+ . •• moving traffic. In addition to safety,the trail will provide much more pleas- ant experiential quality since the tracks parallel river more closely than the highway and are at constant grade. ' <*; The section of the Cedar River Trail east of the CBD passes through a scenic,naturalistic setting. N.E. 12th Street provides a safe alternative to Sunset Blvd because it has sufficient right-of-way to accomm to a bike Constraints: Trail development is subject to acquisition of lane. Auto traffic volumes are also low enough to be compatible the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. with bicycle traffic. 53 City Wide Master Trails Plan -,n. �" •+ram •q%.�:.' ; _� ., µmeet �. • y '..1 v: ,. ,� .•#,?4� :r l p Tie, ''Y . 'a �'+,'�e 4 } I,( • ,:.1.*- ',.;.;;ii'.- i • • .�C . . ,.,. :tea. r;� o ...._,,,., • r :- . :.,-it.....,tz., .14f-, 1/...,,t.-..... 4....., _,..,,,„--. .2.......L___________;.. .-e:. -.--.....:z__.......... : .• • . :•.. I - 1. . it . - •••• ••°!,447 -. -v....,'• .fir..,., � • �' -� The bike trail will utilize the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way which parallels the Cedar River and Maple Valley highway. Traffic noise from the Maple Valley Highway compromises Burnett railroad corridor,is signed as the Cedar River Trail the serenity of the Cedar River Natural Zone. at the intersection of S. 2nd St. and Burnett Avenue. Al- though following this route northbound will lead to the Feasibility:Development of the Cedar River mixed-use trail Cedar River Trail, the sign should be relabeled for clarity. is very feasible.Master planning has already been completed There is also confusion as to which side of Burnett the trail and approved for entire Cedar River Trail System. Develop- follows. There are sidewalks along the east side, but the ment should occur within the next three years because this actual trail follows the west fork. trail was given top priority for the projects funded through the 1989 King County Open Space Bond Issue.The County Opportunities/Amenities:The trail will provide a direct link has already made arrangements to acquire the right-of-way from the CBD to the C-Mar River,Talbot,and Earlington once the imminent Burlington-Northern abandonment oc- Trails. curs. Burnett is anchored by the Cedar River to the north and Burnett Linear Park to the south.This linear space offers an BURNETT TRAIL opportunity to extend the Burnett Linear Park concept - further along the corridor,connecting the natural amenities Recommended Route The Burnett Trail will follow Burnett in a more consistent fashion. Ave.from the intersection of Burnett and the Cedar River Trail southbound to S.W.7th St. The southern two blocks of the trail,between S.5th St.and S.7th St,will pass along the existing Burnett Linear Park. Currently,what is really the Burnett Trail,utilizing the old This linear park could be extended along more of the pro- City Wide Master Trails Plan posed trail,creating a continuous linear park. Tonkin Park is located along the Burnett Corridor,adjacent • to the railroad berm between Houser and Williams. Constraints: Burnett Ave. between S. 7th and S. 5th is �. presently a parking lot for the CBD. Parking needs for . downtown are one of the most important factors vhich will r: be considered as new efforts to revitalize the CBD get under- `' ? ==_ • way. These concerns should be reflected in any new designs < proposed for Burnett. - rLy':k+,� Feasibility: The development of a bike lane alongBurnett '' `�`' p ' fit' k6,. would require the loss of a lane of downtownparking.Until ��:' �.;;' �"��' " parkingissues are better resolved,such a loss would robs- 't `.r .::: •. �, bly not be supported by downtown businesses and shoppers. Though, on a positive note,bicycle lanes could.encourage Although S.W. 7th St is in need of repaving the right-of-way is alternative modes of travel. sufficient to accommodate a bike lane. r Constraints: The road surface is in poor condition,requir- -!• ing repaving and striping. The sewer grates need to be -•` ,�; .•,;��'. `Y `-- realigned to prevent bike tires from slipping between the � grates which presently run parallel with the tire direction. t° `- Feasibility:.This is a very feasible bike route because there is • °- _ still sufficient right-of-way along S.W.7th to develop a bike - Y I lane. However, for economic reasons the city could not 'z• afford to repave and stripe bike lanes alone without includ= ing them as a part of a total road improvement. Without an • `- - LID to support such an effort,this improvement might take .�. '� a long time to occur. ,>• k x c ; Burnett is anchored by the Cedar River Trail to the north and SPRINGBROOK TRAIL Burnett Linear Park to the south. This linear space offers an opportunity to extend the Burnett Linear Park concept further along the corridor. Recommended Route: The Springbrook Trail follows the north-south course of Springbrook Creek from the pro- , EARLINGTON TRAIL posed Black River Trail down to S.W.43rd St.in the Green River Valley. Recommended Route: The Earlington Trail follows S.W. Opportunities/Amenities: This mixed-use trail,located along 7th St.from Burnett Avenue to Oakesdale Avenue. a separated right-of-way,will provide a major north-south passage through Renton's Green River Valley. Opportunities/Amenities:This segment provides good ac- cess to the industrial,research,and business parks develop- The Springbrook Trail will serve as a useful commuter route ing in this area. The Earlington Trail would also link the because this area is in the process of becoming a thriving CBD with the Black River Forest. The trail will serve as a office,scientific research,and industrial park. connector between the Burnett and Springbrook Trails. This wetland trail is rich in birdlife and distinctive vegeta- Although S.W.7th is in need of repaving,the right-of-way is tion. Its high flat banks are suitable for locating a bicycle sufficient to accommodate a bike lane. trail. This route provides the only safe alternative to the auto The trail will make connections with the proposed P-1 Channel dominated S.W.Grady Way. Trail,Cascade Trail,and Earlington Trail. City Wide Master Trails Plan Constraints: Construction of the trail will be incremental INTERURBAN TRAIL because it is largely dependent on adjacent development. • The existing section of the trail was built as a mitigation This proposed trail lies within the City of Tukwila's jurisdic- measure.However,the unpaved section north of Grady Way tion. The trail would utilize the abandoned Interurban and Oalcesdale Ave.was built for maintenance access. Hence, Electric Railroad right-of-way which is situated on the east this portion of the Springbrook is not contingent on corn- side of the Green River between the West Valley Highway mercial development for improvements. and the functioning railroad tracks. Feasibility:A section of the Springbrook Trail is already in The mixed-use trail would utilize a historic transportation place between S.W.34th St.and S.W.41st St. Feasibility of route that served the Puget Sound region during the early continuing the trail is high because this area has become so part of the twentieth century.The Interurban would provide appealing to developers. Construction of trail will become a separated right-of-way for non-motorized transportation, an integral part of the new office park development. which would provide regional connections to Renton,Kent, Seattle,Tukwila,and Auburn. The trail's proximity to Renton's Springbrook Trail and Tukwila's Christianson Trail provide excellent opportuni- -;,.:: . , des for loop trails,contingent on safe connections between ! e: �`` .�.tt plans to improve the S. 180th St. ;�; ': &- .; . ,:;; :•:_ ,; the trails. Tukwila has P .,,_,� .<; ,.. 1 Bridge over the Green River,which will improve connec- s Lions to Renton. f. a ,��,�E • �` Connections to Fort Dent Park and Renton's proposed ,'I WA, �f_ Springbrook Trail are limited by the presence of I-405,which ' ~� crosses the trail mid-way. However, the inclusion of the ok .ti J �� ,`' - r r x ;, • Interurban Trail in the 1989 King County Open Space Bond L.,� • 4 . - �% x., issue will allow for completion of major sections of the trail - " � • despite constraints associated with its development. This wetland trail is rich in bird life and distinctive vegetation. RAINIER AVENUE The high fiat banks of the Springbrook are suitable for locating a bicycle trail Recommended Route:This route connects Seattle,Renton's Linear Business District(LBD). It follows Rainier Avenue southbound to the south end of the Renton Municipal Airport. South of this point Rainier is too dangerous for _ cyclists.Consequently,a bypass route is utilized. :: :` = •- '" The Rainier Avenue Bike Trail follows Rainier Ave.south- ," 5rt ' ! - . Y. bound to N.W. 3rd Place (west of the Greater Renton _' ` F •• '? Chamber of Commerce).The bypass route proceeds west up "4 ` :- , .-- � - , to Taylor Ave. N.,then south to Renton Ave.S.which is a i ',"...;,. - ` signalized crossing. The route then o to the southeast,on , - -. - + to Hardie Ave.which leads directly to the Renton Shopping —. Center. Hardie Ave.continues behind the Renton Center j down to the Earlington Trail at S.W.7th.Street. Opportunities/Amenities: Rainier Avenue north of the air- port is an existing signed,on-street bike route that follows ' i t ` ". ',r ' ^-��{_ `' the west shore of Lake Washington en route to Seattle. The Springbrook passes through less commercially developed The bypass section provides cyclists with a safe means of areas near Longacres and the Metro facility accessing the Rainier Commercial District(which includes • the Renton Center),and connections to Tukwila and Kent. - .s6 City Wide Master Trails Plan It provides a more pleasant alternative to the noisy and Below grade sewer grates from repeated road resurfacings dangerous section of Rainier Ave.south of the airport. create additional hazards. The impact of the bicycle wheel hitting these holes can cause accidents. The Rainier Trail provides connections between the Lake Washington Trail(Lake Loop)and the Earlington Trail.It ultimately makes connection to the Interurban Trail which connects Tukwila,Kent and Auburn. When travelling southbound along Rainier Ave': there are • spectacular views of Mt.Rainier and Lake Washington. 1 - The grade is flat. • Ilk \ * . La lib i � e.. 3 .._ . _ ._0.f�J• • T • 1." mo•t •? _, j ', • "'.--. South of the Municipal Airport, Rainier Avenue becomes _ ` 7 .,�; -= unsafe and unpleasant for bicycle use.Without additional right- - *=.=c: �� `,-k of-way to accommodate a bike lane,a Rainier by-pass route is -=- • • -• _ •.Y.�. `t`' necessary south of Airport Way. - ,..• • ' Bide lane orparking lane?The bike lane is simultaneously used Though off the main strip,this route still provids arts to for parking.This creates situations of danger when cyclists must the Renton Center and other commercial destinations along jut out into traffic in order to avoid parked vehicles. the west side of Rainier. - --- Feasibility: The feasibility of using Rainier Avenue as a Constraints:There is often highspeed traffic along this busy bicycle trail is high. The section from Seattle's Seward Park arterial. j Avenue S.to Renton Avenue S.is already a designated bike lane. South of this point a signed by-pass route is necessary There is a steep hill coming up N.W.3rd,but it is a short to ensure safety. While the right-of-way along Hardie Ave. is too narrow in some areas to accommodate separate bike stretch, easily manageable with the technology of today's lanes,traffic volumes are low enough that the route can be bicycles. utilized for a bike route. The more travelled section of Hardie Ave.which passes behind the Renton Center is wide The bypass makes it difficult to access business on the east enough to include a separate bike lane. side of Rainier Avenue. The shoulder stripes have been eliminated at the north entrance to the airport in order to accommodate left and right turning lanes.This has occurred in spite of the fact that -- numerous cyclists enter and exit the north gate of the airport. This dangerous scenario is exacerbated during rush hours. .I City Wide Master Trails Plan sA eiyik lt,•4,7 d i t . - _A :;44, 4, . _.,,,, , ,_, _. . __.,,,•, „, , , ,,,, , .....„..__. .,A,,, ,t.... , . ....,..„..„. ;_ ,....,10 ' ri art• _ • cz•. _ ' l��z 11. . 01,„ $i- ,o./r1l i-tno ii• ,ti.r.ieii .. , •dAki*k11r11,10 .LTI ,.,_____ . ,. milk yam'` `_p - n t, ►, ilk' r _...-- . . , : . 10 441 cle7 L„, .....--- .._...--- 11►aI s, v,,,i,iw I . . : ...ri ‘‘..1 0 \ ' ti,,,.If;7-1' k . A r 4 1 P yi . - • • ?,`Alt..11 ' ' . ofr, /4i Iiiii 1 1 i/7 . ...•...• •..•. • •\ N1 k 1),pi v i',„( , ,,,. ... • _\‘..hil r A , . ' The by-pass route utilizes much quieter residential streets parallel to Rainier Avenue. From Taylor Avenue there are views of the Rainier business district and Mt.Rainier. CHRISTIANSON TRAIL , This scenic trail,located within the City of Thkwila's j urisdic- Lion,follows the west bank of the Green River between S. • Glacier St and the Tukwila Parkway. Tukwila plans to extend the Christianson Trail to Fort Dent Park and the '�p: H • " " t± + county's proposed Green River TraiL +! , s _-- !._ ��: J l *". I-405 presently limits the extension of this trail north of • - , r.,az „ , Tukwila Parkway. However, reconfiguration of the inter- L, r =-w.• It;,,,,; - ~• state may enable passage of the Christianson Trail under- _,-�..�„ a., _ �'� .. �� ,, neath the freeway. Coordination between Tukwila and the <;• City of Kent will eventually connect the trail with Kent's -• Green River Trail. T ukwila's development of the Christianson Trail alongside the Green River provides a pleasant amenity for cyclists and pedestrians. ' A t City Wide Master Trails Plan SW 16TH STREET Opportunities/Amenities: S.W.16th provides a direct east- west route across the valley. The trail will intersect the Recommended Route: Follow S.W. 16th from Lind Ave. Springbrook Trail, which is the main north-south route through the Green River Valley S.W. 16th may eventually westbound. I connect to the Interurban Trail in Tukwila. :.:�-•---_- It can serve as a useful commuter route to the Group Health facility,the new Federal Aviation Authority office,Long- Y,:.' _: acres,and proposed devlopments soon to be built in this - i ' -.�,d:'." `. area. r~- -- ----� Igo ' �"y a,- Constraints: The heavy automobile congestion near Lon g_ •J :;:z.� " �, acres during racing season(summer and fall months) may ® �� _ �:.-a z t. j compromise the quality of cycling along this route. How- �"""" ever,better bicycling facilities should encourage the use of y '" t` p non-motorized transportation. _N .-- d : Feasibility:The 60 feet of city right-of-way could accommo- + . date a bike lane on both sides of the street. There are presently two L.I.D's (Local Improvement Districts) pro- Lind Avenue provides the only bridge over 1-405 in the Valley. posed for S.W. 16th between Lind Ave.and I ongacres. • . - 7 ��ll_ C , b© AC / ' 1 ' i NETT LEFT ........, lik, \k 1( 1 �t/�' - „ Xp �, r- rrI' IIj1 ... �+�►: . Lr„ � � •�� ! --tea�,a• St wl 10 Of ppoO°Maiimai lSol• nd 0 '1 • w ` 1' I coosdm/rM • A• Cvj ,,. ' _ w-4.a -<. tv ❑ors 1 • •PriAlkk, 4s. 44, .r r -,". ' tiiii) '46V'tis. rw.; ‘ Im . n� �-- LS A 5,"ter_ -- r _ � ~ i y __. __ 1 .. 1 S.W. 16th Street provides cyclists with an east-west route across the Green River Valley, enabling access to Longacres, the Springbrook Valley Trail and large employment centers. '5q City Wide Master Trails Plan SW 27TH STREET west from unincorporated King County, through Renton- Kent borders to Tukwila. - Recommended Route: Follow S.W. 27th westbound from the Springbrook Trail to the proposed Interurban Trail.in Opportunities/Amenities: This route provides linkages Tukwila.. between major residential areas, commercial districts, the Valley Medical community, valley office parks, Renton, Opportunities/Amenities: A bike lane along S.W.27th St. Kent,and Tukwila. Petrovitsky is the only direct east-west will provide a continuous east-west route across the western road. The neighborhoods which would be served are Lake half of the central valley. Youngs, Candlewood Ridge, Carriage Woods, Fairwood Firs,Carriage Lanes,Fairwood Greens,and Benson Hill. Constraints: A trail easement must be secured through the • Longacres property which extends from Oakesdale Ave.to S.W.43rd(S.180th St)provides the only means of crossing the western city limits. the Green River south of I-405. Access to Tukwila's Chris- tianson Trail is located just west of the 180th St.bridge. Feasibility:Feasibility is good for developing S.W.27th into . a bike trail between Lind and Oakesdale Avenues.However, Constraints: This route presently has no safe provisions for extending it further west to connect with Tukwila,crossing cyclists,nor buildable right-of-way to accommodate them. the Green River mid-valley, and connecting with the pro- posed Interurban-Trail is dependent upon two conditions.1) .to- Long-acres must grant a trail easement through its property, — which extends from Oakesdale Avenue to the western city • limits. 2) The City of Tukwila needs to extend Strander Boulevard eastbound across the Green River.If both these • _ conditions are not met,the usefulness of S.W.27th as a bike trail would be questionable. ' M w SOOS CREEK TRAIL Soos Creek trail has been included in this report due to the possible annexation of North Soos Creek. The Soos Creek Trail will follow Big Soos Creek northbound between 256th , Ave.N.and 224th Ave.N. King County has extend the trail Petrovitsky/S W.43rd provides the only direct east-west route to 208th Street. From 208th St. the trail can link to 1406 from Tukwila to the bustling Valley Medical community and Ave.S.E.,which extends northbound to Maple Valley High- the growing Fairwood neighborhoods ofunincorporatedSouth way. The trail passes through the Soos Creek Greenbelt. Idng Country:However,this route currently has no safe provisions Connections to the Lake Youngs Waterline Trail can be for cyclists,nor buildable right-of-way to accommodate them. made at the intersection of the waterline with the Molasses Creek Corridor. Feasibility: Because auto traffic lanes, curbs, gutter, and sidewalks have utilized all of the street right-of-way,there is This trail will link rapidly expanding residential neighbor- currently no foreseeable means of locating a bike route along hoods with the city of Renton. The neighborhoods north of Petrovitsky. However, the need is so critical that future Soos Creek that will be served are: Forest Trails, Forest redesign of the roadway should be considered in accommo- Estates, Fairwood Firs, Carriage Lanes, Carriage Woods, dating non-motorized transportation needs. Fairwood Greens,Fairwood West,and Maplewood. This is a very feasible trail which the County already has MINOR TRAILS partially in place. Minor trails,while smaller in extent than major trails,are no PETROVITSKY TRAIL less important.They form the connective tissue that binds the plan and ensures diversity of use and environment. Recommended Route:The Petrovitsky Trail follows Petro- vitsky Road S.E./S.Carr Road/S.W.43rd Street from east to i I NORTHRIDGE TRAIL DEVIL'S ELBOW TRAIL Recommended Route: From Lake Washington Blvd.pro- Recommended Route: This cross-town trail begins at Lake reMc east along N.E. 44th St. to Lincoln Ave. N.E. Road Washington Blvd.,heads east on N.30th St.,Kennewick PL names change proceeding east but ultimately lead to Coal N.E.,and N.E.27th Street.The trail then drops down into the Creek.The arterial starts as 110th Pl.S.E.which becomes May Creek and Honey Creek valley, following the road 112th S.E.This county road curves around and back up to the northeast where it becomes S.E.88th St.The road drops * ': ;^." '' L�• �r��, down into a small creek valley. On the east ridge of the valley `� -K: ,„• • : '0. .. r / • the road then becomes S.E.89th St. The Northridge Traila.-•. " c ti` -.; prorpeds northeast until it intersects Coal Creek Parkway. -4 . - = •''';_ _" Opportunities/Amenities: Though the majority,of the trail - .': .ram ' n f._ passes through residential areas,much of it is densely wooded. %- `f ';-.-' '-tti :44. The dense vegetation provides shade for cyclists and habitat OT. �' '`w"'�' � for deer which frequent this area. ' , , ^• e• • .-s ". -` '. ♦- r s r•¢ •T". ,Ee .. 2 J '�` ICE. • 5 �Li- f :,jj , --Tr• !cry ' S. .. *a ♦ ' *, " .fi P7 .`. Y 4-I,f L , The winding wooded roads of the Northridge trail provide a s�" pleasant bicycling experience. The shoulders currently are not - '�` ' paved,but the right of way erists to do so for bike lane use. ,,r =+�+�. --- _=' `' , The rolling terrain makes this route popular for training Devil's Elbow road winds under a dense arbor of trees. rides by recreational or competitive cyclists. This includes a challenging long steady climb from the I-405 interchange to known as the"Devil's Elbow"back up on to the east ridge. Lincoln Avenue. The Devil's Elbow Trail then proceeds east along S.E.95th Way(unincorporated King County)to Coal Creek Parkway. The Northridge Trails links the Lake Washington Trail with the Duvall-Coal Creek Trail. 1 Opportunities/Amenities: This trail provides one of the few direct east-west routes from the northeastern city limits to Constraints:There are no shoulders,but right-of-way exists the northwestern city limits. to widen the road with bike lanes. Currently traffic volumes are low enough not to present a danger to cyclists. The Devil's Elbow trail is a mixed suburban and greenbelt trail,which links the neighborhoods of Kennydale,the High- Feasibility: The Northridge Trail is a popular route used by lands,and unincorporated May Valley. It also connects the cyclists. The majority of this route is along county,not city natural amenities of Lake Washington and the May Creek/ roads. King County has already striped Coal Creek Parkway Honey Creek greenbelts. as a bike lane. The Northridge Trail is the logical east-west compliment to the north-south Coal Creek Bile Trail and The route offers variety,passing from relatively busy residen- the Lake Washington Bike Trail. tial streets of N.E.30th to smaller,quiter ones of Kennewick and N.E 27th,then followed by the relatively isolated and natural quality of the Devil's Elbow.The only sounds audible 6 / City Wide Master Trails Plan are the birdsong and rushing of creeks. On the east side of CBD, Talbot Hill, and Tiffany Park, and Rolling Hills Devil's Elbow the area becomes more rural residential along neighborhoods as well as the Lake Youngs Waterline Trail. S.E.95th Way. Puget Drive is a wide road with sufficient right-of-way to The lush verdant greenbelt offers cyclists cool shade during accommodate bicycles. spring and summer months. Constraints:The grade is fairly steep climbing out of Devil's ,f ,; _ .,. Elbow in both directions. ' ; • There is growing pressure to reopen the landslide prone "�,- •�,' ti`� Devil's Elbow road to automobile traffic because it : why " = the only direct route across this northern section of town. ` "' ' ..•• QE pF ••'<ra - ,RI• :, 14 This would not only compromise the safety for cyclists,but r � - ; � — � ��- 74114 would encourage development within this greenbelt. _� i `-'"�- � r t ' ' �. t. IAlk / Feasibility: Feasibility is largely dependent on whether the � � � • road remains closed to automobile traffic. The narrow road -.--q is steep without shoulders. Its narrowness,steep slopes,and ry , �' • f • landslide potential make it environmentally unsafe and ...r_ -ems impractical to widen with bike lanes. Puget Drive has ample unpaved shoulder which could serve cyclists. UNION TRAIL Constraints: The section from the old Benson to Rolling Recommended Route: This trail follows Union Ave. from Hills is built out to the end of the right-of-way with curbs, N.E.4th St.to S.E.95th Way(unincorporated King County). gutters and sidewalks. Opportunities/Amenities: The Union Trail offers a direct Feasibility: Feasibility is high for bike trail development `._� north-south bicycle route for the east side of city. It makes because the section of Puget Drive from Rolling Hills east- connections to the Devil's Elbow and Sunset Trails. bound has undeveloped shoulders. These could be easily paved and striped for bike lanes. Neighborhoods served:Sierra Heights,Presidents Park;and the Highlands BENSON TRAIL yy' Parks and schools served: Kiwanis Park;and Hazen High School. Recommended Route: The route follows the Main Ave. S. Constraints: The shoulder is utilized for parking.However, from the CBD to the Benson Road S.(which is known as the old Benson).The Benson Trail continued southbound where — there is enough street right-of-way that parking could exist the road becomes 108th Ave.S.,outside the city limits. along the curb with placement of the bike lanes adjacent to the parking lane. Opportunities/Amenities: The Benson Trail serves as an Feasibility:Feasibility is high for development of the Union excellent direct north-south connector between the CBD Trail because there is still sufficient right-of--way to accom- and districts to the south. This route would serve the high modate traffic,parking,and bike lanes. residential populations of east Talbot Hill, Victoria Park, Victoria Hills,Benson Hill,and Cascade. PUGET TRAIL Constraints:There are sections along the Benson where the shoulder width diminishes,sometimes disappearing entirely as is the case at the intersection of Benson Road with Puget Recommended Route: The route follows Main Ave. S.to Drive.This situation is also particularly dangerous for north- Benson Road to S.Puget Drive. bound bike traffic headed for the CBD which must cross the bridge over I-405.The shoulder barely exists along the east Opportunities/Amenities: The Puget Trail connects the side lane. z I Neighborhoods served: Talbot Hill, Victoria Park, and -'s '4-, "' .. Victoria Hills within Renton, and unincorporated King County to the south. - There are nice westward views out to the Green River Valley south of S.26th Street. _ " • • 1 The trail accesses Burnett Linear Park, Renton Village Shopping Center,Thomas Teasdale Park,Talbot Park,and '' +_- t ' ' the Panther Creek Wetlands. t _ � y Constraints: The section from Grady Way to cut-off along ' ''••A. the new Benson SR-515 ,designed primarilywith automo- ( ) im -,";:::;. biles in mind,is dangerous for bicyclists. Tandem cyclists utilizing the shoulder along Benson;Road 1 . _ 4 „it.___..z........„..._ ,...e n ..4 f' N.. t iJ �k '.-1 7 '. .. .4 iE -} _ _. :��iTic^.: `• ' i: t,`. F> f f K S 1.1. .fy tery- �. -,. The northern portion of the Talbot trail utilizes SR 515. The `;•`;,;:r„= =' -,r4 traffic volumes are faster along this highway, although the Much of the Benson Trail passes along dense greenbelt. right-of-way is wide enough to accommodate a separate bike 1 lane. I Feasibility: The realignment of I-405 may provide a means • of by-passing this intersection by utilizing the excess I-405 right-of-way that would result from realignment lof the S- ". ' ' �• curves. A bike lane may be obtained along the state right-of- ' way,however the terrain is very steep. I , 0.- - - - Most of the Benson north of I-405 has adequate right-of-way �._ w . to widen the existing shoulders to accommodate bicycles. �. = TALBOT TRAIL _ • - ' Recommended Route: This proposed Talbot Trail follows Smithers Ave.southbound to SR-515 to S. 15th Street.The The southern section of the Talbot Trail is along the less trail then proceeds southbound along Shattock, then jobs traveled Talbot Road There is sufficient right-of-way to build southeast to Talbot Road South. 1 a bike lane. Opportunities/Amenities: Talbot is a major no�th-south Feasibility: Car traffic volumes are low from the base of route. It makes a direct link between downtown and the Talbot Hill near Valley Medical Center up to the top of the Valley Medical district,which is a major destination point, hill because most motorist use the new SR-515.The road is and points south. paved continuously out to the curb and wide enough to 43 } ' High speed auto traffic use will compromise experience for LAKE YOUNGS WATERLINE TRAIL cyclists. Bad traffic congestion along this route during rush - hours degrades air quality and increases noise levels. Recommended Route: The Lake Youngs Waterline Trail follows the Seattle Waterline right-of-way from the base of Feasibility: Although there is a great need for a safe bike Renton Hill southeasterly, through the Tiffany Park and ' route along this corridor, to make it a reality will require Fairwood neighborhoods(unincorporated King County)to lengthy negotiations between the city,county and WSDOT. Lake Youngs. r— Further transporation studies and user surveys will probably be needed before any changes will be made. ' Opportunities/Amenities: The Lake Youngs Trail will link the Lake Youngs Watershed,Philip Arnold Park,Fairwood, Cascade,and Tiffany Park neighborhoods. The trail will also CASCADE TRAIL' connect to the Cascade and Bonneville Trails. Recommended Route: This trail follows the Cascade Water- Presently a trail exists around the circumference of the Lake line from the Benson Trail eastbound to its termination at Youngs watershed,the source of the waterline. Ultimately, the Lake Youngs Waterline Trail. the waterline trail should be extended to connect with this trail. Opportunities/Amenities: This trail provides an off-road experience for the mountain bikes, which have recently Because the right-of-way is wide and undefined,it lends itself gained enormous popularity. to a wide variety of recreational uses without trail user conflicts. The trail will serve the Cascade, Tiffany, and Fairwood .-.?'7 • .y neighborhoods and will provide a safe route to Lindbergh • High School,Nelson Middle School,Tiffany Park and Cas- '" ; �; - r"'ti cade Elementary schools. `>` "'''• :�q ( i The Cascade Trail will provide cyclists with a loop route /,.'"` ° :: �•�;_ . . 't fi+t which utilizes the following trails:Benson,Puget,and Lake t Youngs Waterline Trails.Its connection with the Lake Youngs - : i 2 �`, Waterline Trail offers mountain bicyclists an extensive off- - f '.` { - . road trail experience with varied terrain and character. .'_' --3— _„-v.y_� . , ,,�. Constraints:Although the Cascade Waterline extends across - .,_ "" s . Renton for 2.5 miles, the excessively steep terrain of the - • `'f°"- 4. ._"; waterline west of the Benson Trail limits the distance which ' ' ``- -; =` .,<`= --- „:= it can be used as a bicycle trail. Consequently,the Cascade The wide undefined right-of-way lends itself to a variety of Waterline can only reasonably extend to 1.6 miles.While the recreational uses without a conflict of interest waterline continues as far west as the Springbrook Trail,it crosses areas that are too steep to negotiate by bike.Even for , : -_? all terrain bicycles, it would be difficult and potentially • - =A • F 1 evironmentally damaging to build trails down these near •, . f #j • .. cliffs.Consequently,the Cascade Trails will be designated as .,,„- ' in ..1 ,, i� ' T y ,4} an official bike trail onlybetween the Benson Trail and the w. ! - , ' ' ".+ - , i `. Lake Youngs Waterline Trail. 0. -. °`" x� �'*+ Ailliti Feasibility:Feasibility for developing the Cascade Trail for , mixed use trail is excellent, contingent upon cooperation -=- ....�..'....--,a ..�T - :� ,;t�:.;��;;..:.�.$,. : � with the Seattle Water Department.The waterline is wide y`:;"" ;``_ enough to accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists with- 3. _ out a conflict of interest.The fact .... �-- '' that all terrain bicycles do _ ,'S; not need paved surfaces(nor do �' -'x s r =� their users necessarily want a paved trail) will keep construction costs low enough to ;.= _; , increase the feasibility of trail development. Use of the unpaved waterline provides an extensive in-city off- road experience for mountain bikes. City Wide Master Trails Plan accommodate bike lanes. Although there is more auto EMPIRE TRAIL traffic along SR-515, there is sufficient right-of-way along this short section for both for automobiles and bicycles to Recommended Route: From the Rainier Bypass at Hardie Ave. the trail proceeds west on Empire Way (SR-900). It continues westbound toward Seattle. P-1 CHANNEL TRAIL Opportunities/Amenities: This route serves the rapidly growing residential area neighborhoods of Empire Estates, Sun- Recommended Route:The route follows the course of the pointe,and future developments. There is no safe way to get proposed drainage channel through the Green River Valley from these residential areas to downtown Renton or to from the intersection with the Springbrook Trail at S.W. points west using non-motorized transportation. 43rd St.to S.W.27th St.,where the P-1 joins the Springbrook Creek and Springbrook Trail. The Empire Trail follows the most direct east-west corridor. I Opportunities/Amenities: This separated bike lane would It passes through a dense greenbelt. There are dramatic provide a direct north-south trail along the western city views of the Green River Valley to South Seattle. limits. It could be a companion trail to the Springbrook, through the western valley, with connections t the Constraints: Empire Way (SR-900) is presently Springbrook,S.W.27th and Interurban Trails. very dangerous for cyclists. The inconsistent shoulder is un- paved along many sections. It turns into drainage channel along sections of the northbound lane and has been utilized - Constraints:TheP-1 Channel may not be built.Thereareno by curbs,gutters and sidewalks sections of the southbound present constraints,but as developments proceed,nei,v con- right-of-way. straints may appear. • • • Feasibility: The feasibility of developing the P-1 Channel a_ f • •N r+_ F • Trail is questionable. The drainage channel has no4 been built because the City needs to determine whether the P-1 • • Channel will be needed for storm water management. However, - if the channel is built,the trail could be incorporated into • initial design. • es • �:;"' _ }eye 1 FAIRWOOD TRAIL Empire Way passes through a dense greenbelt The Fairwood trail follows 140th Ave. S.E. from Maple Valley Highway southbound,providing access between Renton ;" ;` = #57, -* 'r;'. 2 „ 4::' a. K: � J and the residential neighborhoods of North Soos Creek.It r j}�� .a '� s $ JY{1, C has been included in this master plan because of the potential :.�w: r..� a :: .- .•• I'S •annexation of North Soos Creek and the large population , , - r 'r r'` "'°-'' center it serves. '' �• �4`f`" Y ' } There are wide stiped shoulders along 140th Ave.S.E.that _. • "1•> • could easilyaccommodate bike lanes. It provides tl�te onl • y r ram•: access between Soos Creek and Maple Valley Highway(SR ,;r 167),east of the Civic Center.Passage is limited by the steep slopes of the Maple Valley (Cedar River Valley). Conse- -w `.:;;.'; -�► . - quently, the Fairwood Trail is an important link to the • _ 1' development of a regional trails system. The inconsistent shoulder is unpaved along many sections that pass through densely populated residential areas. V Imo~ City Wide Master Trails Plan There are panoramic views of the Green River Valley and the city from Renton Hill. Varied terrain offers challenges to mountain bikers. ' r Feasibility: Feasibility is very high for utilizing the Lake Youngs Waterline as a mixed use trail. The gravel service roads are presently in a condition that is usable by all terrain bicycles. As is the case with the Cascade Trail, the Lake Youngs Waterline is sufficiently wide to be able to accom- modate bicycle,pedestrians,and equestrian use. 1 4 ' . . i.c- .. ) , . *... 1%1.. Iii, To lovue 4,..4 , • ------.. .. .- ..- 1 .01-----timi / I :-\--7)few7 ---..---.----- - --• -_- -• J ?---..i , ., •• ..,. ',......° / ) 0 / II Rainier est ti„-,. •-I,-,,r 4 .i. 4 6 • 1Z \ I 11:b. . 7.--t. '\ Lake ,N1 •Ilt. -', ' . 4/ '# § I. • .t,1! i Vaingt3n Hood VI • i •''',:f,:.; :.:,- : i . .... ?. , BA r ID••II i ..;3.,:. . -_AN „, 1, , ;: IA_1 \ - --- • .1, ( -• ' k \ Pia - 11 MERCER1SLAND 1' 'n I Are rii, 111 . Was i ton ----_-- ------ , Cr ... ,..00 ! ilk ' :"*.:•45'• .. _ •y. .i. 1 !. \ )\ .., ... ..,.. . ' .. /-... , 1 . t, • 1 0 1 1:3171 4 4 r , )it . ._ - 4116 East KTWny• I: •. . ... .,. • -"//1›,i I :s. -,.. %. III. Mlle Post 4 A*;t1,11:,... '''.‘: ...,*‘4.2°,-,- - , .1, './ 1A -* -' f, v - 1 . , ,i. v. . . , :. , ...,,, : , ." .. ! "\ --, ,' Ar * 14/ . . . . -, .• ' !?I.4 '.;?. -11 .•,..z.,.•• 7..ilf 4 \t-Lo Q 0 .-)`. \ ) k _ • . . .....„ ....,,... , -ji • . • ;'.; #... .. 0 VW/1i •- - ,.'" ;711”' macs 1! tt.f.:p''1U. 1.34 •-•_. .4:-...A&NW it . . • . PM& Ar7 441 I .... ..:14. Fait .3:jf..• ... ,.I.•;.,1:e.•:t:...'.....Z..1 r"._Willi I" 14 / .1 V i• .....4 ..I . .34ta• • iv,: .4:". -,......_•22e. • • ••a•or ..v.k... il''''''1‘ fArie Aff-.,* • 0X /- Iiiill" ,ar .1:4; , .,4-•••• ( „ ..4,0 ..____-§1. ..,.....3,4a.,......•. ..-t0 1:410:104,--ki ;, 144.11.41flif,;), ,....Itieetir.,... /.1' ...i.'r.; ydal r ?:(.4.k. ',-1',4-41.4 ..1.1Ati....rs._,G. ..e Ha Crook A-4:50 _ ----- ----- li,r- firt 1•I Op Coleman Point ,O,E--311M ?dek akt.„2.... en *:;detrit 1 %. '- asli•wftill...v.:•• '- 1144.1.r,"-M .,.. .t.-44,a11- 'wit, ..:•.,•4•t*--: •74.-....- • -:07...,-4-40111P•A•&•;-• ,., ... ,Fil Ali — - 'i: '• --4 . .1.. ... "41.-an-7447,My44,;-.1*- \yr•-•-•111 110/ .. _ . .1.... . ,40.477.L.'4.'"'"*. 11111,,,-------a,..5 0 3,-,,,, ,.....• . 1110040... .4t,si ....1.1.1.111111%,_ 4at0. .g.f\9L-V,N•:4i4ii4i-0,r• -. 0m..r.„ ..0o• 1-H4•o•n•.,,k Y Sierra nHceuiegih-ts . 74104 III r 3sl„ ----ii1111111111 ,i • ,,7*L)- t• i‘ g..u.w:4;I.i,I4,- oI1.0cci:t4.t:6.:',-:•/4.1..4-2- \ To Ss. ,...ML...-: L A K E INGTON •„IaII C4 lIZ%%iiS-;"1klit N4V,a1„N1 1..t1,1..,.4-..x:.e*-.'r.41 1 711-i1frA1,1•,47,;.-,il5i.4E1l.1..f,n.o..4..1-:7i.-if4i,.'Ll-.aiz..-P.b 7"...-'•., : 'a1 11 1 i .....':.1IIiI 1il -,- :I "4*-05 9 I Awlwi-.i...t•'...Y'•1 '1<..."-I-14ii.1j4li1k,il;1 s5 2 0.. 10074i,1l1.l•' -- I.a0-.•a• —llIlkdIS1PI.1i I. ,1 I1_Mii:1:1 .u101m 0117.m141e111rt1w.NinZd T o Issa,\ q uah\jIL'O° --m- L -- Ake • I II I 1 1 L.i-.\ N-N: ' 41 ' ,..'' , --\ s.*.Ast., •• .,. ---.• :. . i .rk/111 i -.,.e•- * Bry awr / fl- &V, 44.4brt..44,.• ... . .7:-..57 -iiiiimA.-. , ,_ i McNI•.•"I in , . . ,d.:z....14,, F - ,--r-1 ' -- I 3M1 MB MI 1 - oney•ii Seattre Ity Limits / l ‘17 .4,- ,L_....4,,,... 0 --.,,,,_ ,,,i, __ , _ , k 1 k . _. MOM /NM I '' / s• I i. 411 -----t -› N , . • n ?..• • ___-.1.e. . . , ,,..,&:- •$, .1-.„. . 0 :12h Sthe°1 I 0 I II . i , _ li.,.1.;g„.: I . ..1 BOEING COsapilIN ,. : / • \ , , , \ ' \\ \ KtsPiTI: •ff lip En 11 •• •/ —_.--:-. s..Conitral!Union Loeatar Map MAJOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS 0 0 0 MAJOR BICYCLE TRAILS IN ig ii POTENTIAL TRAILHEAD 0 UM 011;nil Mir NIIMIlh A0,0", MINOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS Q Q Q MINOR BICYCLE TRAILS El 1M Si UPHILL GRADE >>>> > 1111E ivalii0 1 0! NORTH 11111,11 IIIIII? MIXED USE TRAILS 0 III 0 S I PARKS/GREENBELTS Wig 0 .25ml .50m1 .75m1 1.00m1 ....-I NORTHERN RENTON LOCATER MAP i • '.... i \ - \ . '11,'••• Soo NoeIbsen Rip.Non Lambe Map • r" 1 k) ) -\ II*.•_.,, _, •\ e ..L111.•ii.......-- ... . _ _ .;. _ .4 l ': • - l 1 , • W ' • L Ik.N., ' ... ^••-• .. • 0111111. Labe Washington ':-'4.---111r- ar - At.i-ey,...0:,,,.. I 111 11 1 /4111111111ke . . 1 . . ..,z, . ... w, . "''''''' 3.A.i'1"'‘.': ' • ..... 1 • '.minirj\ \ ..4,- -.z. -'4.1,-.-.1i4e) 1- .*, s.rrilikk; . • -- f,..,': .„:„4.E.,;...:„--- . .,44/0 .... --Av. , -,f.til 1 - - , Seattte ity Limits J.,....,/ ‘, 40,..,4:s4..- -- -. -.- ..i_..„...t.:!..!---i.., •7 -4.0 0 - - ,„.., rigi,llrid i. lip --I 1 ^ ''''','.• ;--..''''F•i- . ryn Mawr -,.11. ,....0, •1 -•- ,--. . •• 41 - ,-,.1r •-- -...., • / ,,.,„s, \ • . & OP: ‘..-in.*.- I iir il fahool 2) - 0 it 4.0 SOEING COMPANY 1 . . . •< 41 ‘ • _ : 4... •• \\. r.1 4. 'Ilvaiv-7; • -1 . lirt, .14 2,4itor. 11 ._ .1 . I t ,,--:. ... ,1,,pvi.FZ:0 • •1 Highlowis Park/ , . I , . _ 8 `,..Convnuntty Canter : . .11 :111 \\741111, I -var si ,iii_ .. • i i i Skyway . •is-1 \AS CO i ; ; •1 ‘_., •O % 1,-- •r . ' I ma Ai . Mir .1 • PACC:1T -§- , 4.61 Highlands r- , ) I ‘ . rth Renton, ,s, .4,e-illierai ,ti..;- PO ,. • if,_.__ .) , 1. -,- • ) - 11144 .• Veal Da] .•Mi4t-7.*1‘1;-.-.rN.•..-.-*.:.t.4t._1'_,*______ _____.a_r.-/''-'k..•"._-------.0.-3-•,..,. _.^ 7----,-..____...,._..,._. M_•._ u.._•-_ I r-f i-_t I 1._1p'4 i`..ig.-:. -:r,t:,:/•-i.-----rh.-..-.".i.oi.n-l'ILLn!4.44O..,4E 4 A'\/_,_1': ,l..lg2aLiQ;Ii1_l,"ii'r.,,lU7 1i-,!If ieti I1mA ilPSM'5_b.,1lO IILtIt-PYJ,It.•'nUi..-'.;;"'/,'..W:i..:v'•ift -.:•':/,.,..,I.,.,:i iltl./i,. pk4 e.o1_° „. • -- /moode.C.'"r Dvow n s 44(Ib.111i 11 1 FernWOitOd 111- i Irj • • - - : ly AAAr Heather Downs i : • , w 0p- n Ma 'tomd40Hehts 1 ,....-...z...,...„ 0,, -.-1,•„4- -.,.- '--._ i p....:4...:elioh -* - -•--. ...,...., . -.... -,,,,-,i.i.e4,-.6.. . . . d--v.-,-,--...... r '---- --- • Pi _ it .....r.„,,..„.... ., ..,.., ‘-. , , _. ..,.. 4 • 8 • 1 4 Earlincricw. Park -.•.,..,. . rik1,744'6.A:1411. i. it: :ierlip. Ibritt:42 V e',•4::ri.etr-'.1104-.4:,.0:4-gy 1•• 1r u% '•• -‘,* 0 - - 1g Z.4.411140'‘k$:10 .t-.0,1-X. 41 1 .:.;.•- --,..,-.1" . gZU• 4.L.,. -..1:..... f, e.-41,,, '- - ----. , • i 1 likt, ‘:-..i! 4',g., -.-'.,, 's%-',V,,11' 'NVO.istAk. - iiir- ••q:,-.,J'A ..1„,w;?M'ecK -, ,,.• ...,i,v,..!,,'-4„..,s...*_„-N,‘, , -41:470- -.....,-% ( ,‘,11111 .4; ,ff----11' _ ,.....144:1..--,::: • --• lip • . Renton 01_enter 14 g 7-2 A - - % liro ..-k*Att,s1r,e.:-..!..4117.3- 4',..d.-iw •44,PME-,Wi . ..f/---' '"Y' St t To. .1- Air .24.\* .-,..,.• 4st- -..;k4,.. a...- Ptrk -• •.., w,' ,..''t's-i/C•'. ,,.. i 111-77-%, ''.•r P97 • Park 4'fl '-- ..'4:.:''''CilleTe • • • •.‘t-140,W,a ;P• 40S, ) .. '...-'i....:4.4-*2 •4, ' \ -0107ft‘:-.. IP;°1-r..A.5,-., ,'' •••• - • .-. .- .?- ....Aa,-4'NIP.Alk)la,:•,A-73Z.341.ra- 1 0,4 ...., ,.k.744.c.I.th,;„:4:1„1„,!abor-;..... A . .. i %lik. 4',)% .4. NPI.047a..1.4* lir •---117.Wpir t•fp tit a::: • 4" (P, ..,:.*:.!;:s.sawirz-, eartiriviarir..• -k-st .7 0-.070. ilis4A-P-- , 1-7.- , , (Th- ,.,...-.-4- ...i....,•;rorkiry \. 0 at- , ozo • •,. ,,,...•• 4 L• _ __ lb . - " Wi V:-:nra04.4: -- ***1 tit. at 1.k...,1::44;z-w --X,'-'49. - ••• ,A" :-1--'1:?:- .'' i- -2- - ,...-,, . uri no .... ... No 1 rw.- WIll .., .ff,._, YON 14!".•si. -'' i 110 40 .4:•1%;--- - -T.:: Ni% .V.-!.1r..-.. '," 44-.- .?f•i4441i.,1;'':.•• , , ...:,_ -ak __ , ....._wai;. = -= .=wa ...j.m,.._1 A _ 1...... , .4.5-..._,,,,-- 11 Q' .- tlr,A1 ,r' ._ --. .., L-- . n ..-911141.1 :,, -1/4"4447r4t4,4...,..,-,_..,-,'.'- ..;77.2.1'.1•Ve--1, 4 ,,....t, ,-..,,, . )- i.,..,.,v0 • vw••• 0 I •,...., is. ,,.. . 0 .._, ... .. ,... mist-.11,-.... .16-... ..:-,a.. ..• r:-..t..,..........,..• --e,,./... .',___r:•:.:k.:.-;'i".4.4; :••• "•'‘,77;..- , n IF - ,.wioi. f-r:- mr".wilr.N, >.,-;,-;A-.,,- 4:t..7.4.-7.41,7:4.i.-.: ;1..,:p . N.____ ,-;:i7.7•Zi,:-, 1 -'''7"ct. ' • - %A 4 , • fA.r,o,kpdPhili .dig....„....• - - ,...,' _•.1- .,4 ,;: ja.f.'"PeracrTI itjit.eriil. i . ,,• gsk.:;K:Z>V4.743:'--.. "."..... . .r......1?:;PS44,4:11,-;;;?; ' K•114.-''IP,* .4k) I , iii .44 .....6.0 k•41"---- .'!.:1-.. .....'.404174,111t"reirt51 \,-.1 'NI.%,••• '•4.-%.'":;;,•.:A ,V..'' '' :._ '..",....',..4.2.4'.- _ •••7••,),:t, I 0....., q,' ,?ft. 1446._< €0---46.: , '- ',4,=.7.-4-x,---,xtei•leaf-gir..4. I.,' liki. 9:4!Pi€wo9d, ---,AD:-,..,4,- ,___,:dr-um..- !Vart,....\• 0= „„„. .. aii i so• ' ,...,7./L opi, ir -iisi..% v.s... w•.:•--::..V044:i.*Op.,,i:•V tr-:1-4...V.•=:-,,..-i,,:. ..,.:7•.-0-.....- _ ____ -?.70 -- ,. s .• • ,....,e3k‘tc-r,n, ' %op Treatment Plant .1r ‘.. .,1 ..., .P.4: 1 .Power 7 ,.' S' ''''''''ZtleAVA:4 4-Z.Alt .--,--•--. 0..),-; .1117.-„si, „ a-rf A 1 11 •Apeti, lt, . -.%''''' '..?.:,7..qi;!...., ',...--4•••••••• ,I.Z.- .4.:•:" ' 41'3; a.• f. -'-:° abir„.'etAlk,. - v-.'"VI'.5:f'.. *'• 10•40---,.........q.......-z,,,,:i..,,, .-• --......-,-.. . s 4001 „iii sv 6‘1114 ii AS % A ....... . ••-•. 111 , -1 40. 5 ii, ,11 'itt,t741 . •<:'_';'-' 0 •. '1;07>•••,,r„,...4---. -ah,..L.te-4• .4gb.t. Maplewood ' ----=.2.-.....:-• '-', -.•'.-T V St trd. Tiffany 'ar .t. • ,... • W.,:..:-.V-g• IIIT,A. ...._ .- EL ,G, „..1 ...Ater I .. - -- .40,,s1 -^. ••• . ,, im, ....:.:. , 6... --fr.,' sm.--..ro-‘-' ---- --•-----\,--\___) ij '''_f, „ ,, 1-1 --. .;:•••••4 ..';':,;4-. 4.."A. -s.•-,..st::••••!•'•'..,-,:„..? \‘, ---.....--•,,.‘., ,.. ---e \tio_____,. -;'•::`.1$N0;.!--• IP *....11M."rt,c.:-t.':-•••..'::\ Tuk-wilifr -,-.4 ' •• ,..-__--. N. it ....-.. ,/- ...... 4. 4)1 ,,Q, ) wk';cn ' 4.1-NW, .z: .... 0.1:...,V4.-'•':•:. ' --. ?A \------"-- c---- . - i Talbot Hill ./ 2 .1 -.-:;• 7 -1,-i, .:410ftI ?,i'l.11.11,....14411.,*.,*. .. . 4'.. ' ---3\1700-2130'n°'\ - 40 • --.T.' - V ., ,------ A.* i ' I \ henagins' .'49' . ,,e'-'1,.;• g'_,M:"..'••••tlie61:-..1. ,,, .•Perk .,.rt IrE ' S414 Southern Renton Locator Map MAJOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS 0 0 0 MAJOR BICYCLE TRAILS IC IEI El POTENTIAL TRAILHEAD ® lillf.1 I I 1111,In ENE 6sf'''' Iltk I:!: ' XII MINOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS 000 MINOR BICYCLE TRAILS in IE [t] UPHILL GRADE >>>> > II1$1 10 0 .25mI .50M I .75ml 1.00mI NORTH 1 •-•-.. MIXED USE TRAILS 0 17 0 El PARKS/GREENBELTS EN .,--1 CENTRAI_, RENTON LOCATER MAP ....) i 0 i / se..41/41/ ln:"3 \ a' 1 , it: a licnimill 1�1��s-� / 5 / -.1v)E Eqi z m 3 m d � Q Q' Q , \ / � '�1 < Is . : N. • on 51. a3 a. L ma a. .IlkF '. -�,._ L :nlor Cent ; f'. ' m, ..,• 1 -? ."5771,a33;i a . * :4,0442. /2 2Cr,?,..,_1 1 N NS i\ k III ______ • i / .:::,s1:10.3, * ' •..,,"'?'' '',`.3 1.-1'?Ir)7›? ,4ir../f t l u I \ 'N,f . . i. . -I ri ...doni , 0 la v icl it . 41., • • z 4 :,,,,:------'-r,,t-gy . / . N-/ III Elb: It o 36.1" ‘111alo 4 • •� ,� ^rE j? . ;•_ J 'ii Library -01 •11.l1) CityHall '7 \ --e' _• ;�r n oyy � �Pie' /Y IVY 5�4 a�V V V:Vt CO lit— E 0 II ail , kip' • •.Ak Q ��1 in ei c.i :c dirt, f ommunity Center.•y3'•C}`�j',:�� ua. ` Qit�,i,.:4Q '"; • IN �F-1 .� 41i .fie ..�y. j.}-, �n- .:� �.r�.iy y � 4:4 V''V •t r -- In 1 > '���� Z�ty ter[' ,f�/!J"•�')" t'y' ,.t7_1(1 1�'� yo .. lil: I` ' [:•II r �- `� �� G,�: n r I'4,,h� ' in^ '""V II�I�I�MII�I��lt�l1 .-� i1" y►,l� 40 A N �1,1 rt. ,,..c.4..�.. .� '� -',..A.., ` yY .6.i.�3 �'�`{ I I .a .. .:.. ,.� � or %wf�„Gi•C,1!7�.r••�', Y •t�vlv:., a, - _ i+� .ti _ � <",4,:t--- , t Saar River— 'ii • tom, fr cG t.''t [JO ta�ll� slit ii - .'f'i'�, k f. 0 )� i- ^• �yf(` G�•o'L(t.1:4 �4 G L. ,i �,�= � ite A� lw f l416�4ytbi • 4X'`.. w �4t+• `G �.•rE�F ai {!a / i� Vow � f.�Lr W. s' •' G:� O 4,r > ,`t' "` ` Y, �►` , `•V '(, car, 1, -: jy;t�.i.�. .tv f b 4 t1r r; 1 , ty.. 1i„( t O ti..�VV �P / ' ! i a' •c..ci- `- .',,ir•d F :�f'� � tt'= 'L .t,.. `t4c II :II) ` G G ° ;40 i� 1 1� 1� �D ���;�, qC xrG� ecjarriverNatural one c �('I cz te-.'t' `9''t • I- ...c„, , cittco. vitt ' : ss x c G C y `c. t : y�• ty---.. z1 4` f 4„ci,, c,04 .(' '• t• 4L Zidt;t— .".. 6tt 51' * I iv 6. itti 8z,tt-c'.,-te:‘,-- 4 4 . > 6 ;••-• .:,,,-' ..; ikA,ua •t!4.;;Ft./t81-L.,: t4'0;1-'Ir''•%..g,--i,/,..-4.3‹ R.:!57- •,..t,k,..4t,s /...4(..s!-r,A.1--Sgeti--4..t.- - c Ze'*rii ‘:,1:4 *97 it Y4-".7..tI L,C Ld. / . 0 t a 6 ""••.: 't;%1-..'..,..,,,,,..4f.f','4'''..:4 GI. fe„„z : i:€:•ca. g,,•k,,t ti 4 .,.;:_-,.:•, ".t.i,-,eV:.44f, ��{-,ply f •)i. a;-` L c} t o '' ;•' S ..�. �S.7;(y, 1-t-4e6-.,,..!.4, PEDESTRIAN TRAILS O 0 0 STREET CROSSING =111 F �� BICYCLE TRAILS SIDEWALK SYSTEM _ � II _IIII I[I III _ II EMI III I�,f 111111 1 mi .2mi TH IIII o NOR PARKS/GREENBELTS 5 CRDLOCATERMAP - / \ See Central R•Mon LAMM,Map .k......,y.-i-.,...Y...•.4r.4 il.\l 0iN a.rirl 44A fi o:kIIN ..., ,, 'r"• o--iJ w— --. cc(1I i E-•44%!A-.•-4.•'.e... .l*,;,c.:-,_.____. k® F' ; 9 •" 1 •-, t uw??,: .. ...,..y„-•.: 1 ` 7-sv•?; `r j•::`w\•._ i • \� i e y,,y. efe •■ sk .41 `eI`I` ' 0iI\ a 'l ( •./\ `) �1� : !Y _ 1 oeme,c,ry .!a:• �Va��'!'r2:1 jt Ti`' ��'�,.:. 2 .e' ' w •.• LONG To E;- t! Ha ) • v .. ; '.:• ,.., ++i ACRES „ t.1 f+ +4 i� ` P O O 'fit, y, a[......1 -t/iiin aw,.., 4p, 0 __ rioglie p 7. jrCIIC-11— - ill -CrO 0 t-ri C_ O — Q ° O Q sr 1 li: �, +di L'4 . . mSl• • ,, — :• i w � 111 ictafria Park, a s s GLn — —= SE 1"th __ �'�' . airwood ' . [ _ E n:- - .�.. IT ,►, y,, r ;1t �!• West ��� O ■ Q: '� -� \ �� I Cascade .� ` !II . CI: EL I. 00, il, op 9. 0 0 • • ,____ so:' i• rilit •' O ■i , ' �� = � �5� i airwood Greens : - 41° ;��L` VI ,• • Hills "• .a krJa' 'tf' \ ' • 0 {�,�•;; (S. `., I� }yt�.l1JCI� 7�Y,:- "•C' Falr,.00d Gdf and . s. .,, JIi � "rvl, :2:-y%;' ' iTy +:• y am'•', Country Club ,,;gip r 3jn IIIII ! -.,4----nn AII: 1,.,...01 \ -44' '� t ' 4 tvi kit,• it � s. El 0 4. --\ 4:1 O <�•:'ul t., ,. il::44'.1iist7^wl rYrii�4:::s ,Te;��r� pc /wii__ i �-`���� ' I� Falrwoon I ', • l ; __. .. i.�e0 - •�•'.� \/ - ..'r'' . �.•••. . ..plug Cants El t /. �� mile-al .�f �a•, ?: -,r•..,:f ...'h..;.- �.. ' 111 0 © ( nt.f /t i Benson Hill E '$,� T'• ��'rC�}e�C�'•I^ �` i �n I -\0 fik 1•4 r. T ,'�6c:. a FalryVood CrestCarriage Lanes 0. en la 1 _fl , a •�'f• f`R:-� To Lake Youngs.E net ' ar� • N c R•, •. /. I AltNi.I f ( . Boutavard Lane �I Eastwood Firs _ii. , lil r5--\, ____..„ i O! �; ( ?�(00/ , . .„... ...„,..„ . ., 111 I •:,��`y Forest Estates • -. ;.1.*••Y' .0 \ 1 -I .1 ,.? ri iI: _ .. :69,„0„...;,......;;;, , 1. d 0, ,, ? ...:„.z.,,,..,4,,,. .,,....„.v..,, ....„....:::.,.,,. ....„:„...„..;,._.. ..„............ . d • \ J'-7 I�Y• �'r it iT. a g N ■ ' ` ! SI ' •. - - \ so,gel a - _\ - lid s.�,.,.�� r.`y�.+::r•c"y: _ _'":.-•. Trails �cc ,1 : 1 11 I/7 ;; • �' • -J/ \ I � ` •�• , it 11 ci / t SLa• i ! �.. , I 0To Auburn••IN. s, 4+iss:�. • .d.- Watershed �' s �a�nkr hitney Glen �,� Parkridge East MAJOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS O O 0 MAJOR BICYCLE TRAILS ® MI Iffl POTENTIAL TRAILHEAD © iilI'l:t l;t t.UarII!'l 1. II I;' ! ii �� MINOR PEDESTRIAN TRAILS 0 0 0 MINOR BICYCLE TRAILS II UPHILL GRADE >»> ' Ili ' Ulf ,I! IC IIIIIPMIXED USE TRAILS O ® (� IIIPARKS/GREENBELTS0 .25m1 .50m1 .75m1 1.00m1 NORTH ( SOUTHER1N IffiVUON LOCATER NAP � I PLAN FOR ACTION: IMPLEMENTATION No matter how well conceived a master plan maybe,it is only sited to compliment the neighborhood sidewalk sys- a concept until steps are taken to implement the plan. Im- tern and to augment the School Walkway program. plementation of a master plan converts what ar essentially Bicycle,routes were selected that connect with systems ideas into reality. Many issues must be consi erect in this of King County and adjacent jurisdictions. conversion process.Reflecting this,complexity,the strategy for the implementation of the City of Renton Trails Master 3) Resource/open space protection and public access: plan is based on the coordination of the six following ele- Trail corridors can be used to preserve greenbelts, ments: wetlands,riparian corridors,and the wildlife habitats associated with these environments.In addition to this 1) Priorities environmental benefit,trails can provide public access 2) Right of Way Acquisition to shorelines,forest,fields,and meadows. 3) Funding Sources 4) Construction Costs. 4) Recreational potential: Walking,hiking,running,and 5) Programming Trail Development bicycling have become major forms of modern recrea- 6) Citizen Involvement tion. Trails provide the optimum means for safely par- ticipating in these pastimes. The recreational value of trails are increased by the fact that not only are the 1. ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES trails themselves utilized for walking and biking,but they provide connections to other recreational re- A comprehensive plan,including over 50 trails,will need to sources such as parks,beaches, and community cen- be developed over the course of manyyears.Which trails will ters. be developed first will be a function of how well they meet a 5) Cost of acquisition and development: Separate costs determined set of criteria.The importance given to a particu- are involved to acquire the trail right of way and to lar trail became a function of the cumulative to of the planning criteria as opposed to the ranking_of any develop and maintain it Trail implementation is a criterion over another. Trails that satisfy the most criteria function of both of these considerations. rank the highest in priority.• 6) Ability to leverage funding: The greater the regional The criteria used for prioritizing were: resource a trail may be,the better chance there is to leverage funds from a variety of sources such as City,. 1) Safety:Past planning efforts have given a higher prior- County,State and Federal funds. ity to assuring the safety of motorized transportation. Non-motorized transportation safety issues,especially �) Multiple use potential: Some trails have sufficient right of wayto accommodate bicycles,pedestrians,and for bicycles have basically not been considered. In �' efforts to correct this situation, trails have been se- can without a conflict. The more users a trail lected which have the potential.to provide safe places can serve the. more valuable it will be to the City's to walk,run,and bicycle in the city. Efforts have been overall trail system. made to address conflict of use issues,not only between motorized and non-motorized travelers,but between pedestrians and cyclists who are both competing for limited space. • 2) Regional and local connections: Trails were selected to connect local neighborhoods,attractions,and em- ployment centers, as well as to link up with regional destinations and trail systems. Pedestrian trails were 67 City Wide Master Trails Plan . 2. TRAIL EASEMENTS AND Railroad Right-of-Ways RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION The shift in American transportation from trains that pre- vailed in the early part of the century to cars, trucks, and Acquisition costs will vary considerably for each trail de- planes that now predominate has resulted in the abandon- pending on the length of the trail and the extent the jurisdic- ment of many railroad lines. However, the transportation tion wishes to control the land (lease, easement, or fee value of these right-of-ways has not been lost;for they have simple). Acquisition costs are also a function of the width of been transformed into excellent trails for non-motorized - the right-of-way required,willingness of the owner to sell, transportation. and the unique or special quality of the property. Railroad corridors are continuous tracts of land in what is Though related to funding sources,trail right-of-ways can be usually highly fragmented urban and suburban areas.Assem- acquired through a variety of means without necessitating bling hundreds of small parcels to create trail corridors could any direct purchase or transfer of funds. Ideally,the City be politically difficult and financially prohibitive. In con- should strive to locate proposed trails along city owned right- trast, an abandoned railroad right-of-way can offer this of-ways and easements wherever possible. This includes opportunity at lower cost--and perhaps even for free.3 street right-of-ways;utility and sewer easements,park land, public shoreline,and publicly owned greenbelts. ,:: r'• RIGHT-OF-WAYS , 's, '' ;. ,• �' ' Street Right-of-Way ..c.v. :.'v.,N",=`... + r ..11:,4 Street right-of--way includes the street,shoulder or bike lane, t =� ..; ' : •. curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and a planting strip. In some cases t {ev,_ 1 Ap E's, -. j'; , * r r the City may own the right-of-way,but it may not be easily `' ! -: ` - 4 buildable,as is the case along some steeply sloped roadways. -�' .. +; r ,y, In other cases,ample right-of-way width which is buildable � � e ;, -*�` ?1r $„ ` " '' ` can be paved,and/or striped for bike lane use.For pedestrian "°_ it . . ,'.;,t•;:74, i%, . ‘\...Y',,...I_e.-.•'''"- use,curbs,gutters,and sidewalks can be installed. The abandonment of the Burlington Northern Railroad Washington State Dept.of Transportation(WSDOT) right-of--way will provide a flat trail corridor through the Cedar River Natural Zones There is potential to secure trail easements along the inter- state highway right-of-way. Ironically,the presence of the I- The Rails to Trail Conservancy has been established in 405 motor freeway throughout the City of Renton may also Washington D.C.to help jurisdictions acquire railroad right- provide opportunities for the development of non-motor- of-ways for trail use. Their acquisition efforts have the ized transportation. WSDOT is also obligated by law to potential to create an integrated national network of trails. provide paths and routes for pedestrians,equestrians,and . bicyclists. RCW 47.30 requires that three-tenths of one Trails in Renton that have or will utilize abandoned railroad percent of its construction program be set aside for paths and right-of--ways,are: The Burnett, Cedar River, and Pacific trails, usually in the form of widened highway shoulders. Coast Railroad Trails.The proposed Interurban Trail in the These trails are constructed under WSDOT contracts,but adjacent city of Tukwila will use the old Interurban Electric upon completion are usually transferred to other agencies Railroad Line. for management and maintenance. 2 •, Storm Water Management Trails which could benefit from the shared use of the highway , right-of-way are the Grant Creek,Sunset Puget Power,Benson Flood plains and areas of open space required by cities for and Springbrook Trails.Similarly,the right-of-way along SR their storm water management needs provide excellent pos- 167 may provide some land for the Panther Creek Wetland sibilities for trail use. Fortunately,they often parallel water -- Trail, while the Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) might • i King Dept of Planning'Urban Trails Plan,-19TI,p 65 furnish right-of--way.for the Cedar River Trail. Committee for Outdoor Recreation,Washington Sum nails Master Der Plan—Draft, ; 199q p 3 Rails to Trails Conservancy,membership pamphlet,Washington D.C. - f City Wide Master Trails Plena courses (flood control)that provide the main amenity for a income tax,property tax,and/or estate tax.. trail as well. During peak flood periods the trails`may have to be temporarily closed,but this is usually only for a few days The Conservation Easement Handbook states: a year. -- The donation of a conservation easement is a tax deductible charitable gift,provided that the easement is perpetual and EASEMENTS is donated"exclusively for conservation purposes"to a quali- fied conservation organization or public agency. Internal Utility and Sewer Easements Revenue Code Section 170(h)generally defines "conserva- lion purposes"to include the following: Utility easements such as power, gas, oil, and water lines provide excellent opportunities for trail development. Al- • the preservation of land areas for outdoor recreation by, though they are not owned by the City, the City can often or the education of,the general public negotiate a shared trail easement with the utility Companies. Sewer easements and associated maintenance roads lend • the protection of relatively natural habitats of fish,wild- themselves equally to trail development and are already in life,or plants or similar ecosystems _ the City's possession. • • the preservation of open space--including farmland and ``'_ '` �p 4.- .,, , . ' • t:4,,: forest land -- for scenic enjoyment or pursuant to an u •" adopted governmental conservation policy; in either ; _;;•�� case,such open space preservation must yield a signifi- .:.: ]''li• Nr. •�.�¢� �► cant public benefit • t • the preservation of historically important land areas or 1`R buildings Mg G 6- .0. f Federal estate taxes are levied not on the value of the 4 '•,e•' i *o't, +�.= :gat i, — r v property for its existing use,but on its fair market value-- -, ' roughly the amount an investor would pay to develop the • property. In the case of large estates or large tracts of open - ;t ,.o . g g Pe -• ; Fr) „-,; „fir k.-r space,the resulting estate tax can be so high that the heirs ' '"': _vi :� i�•.; would have to sell the property in order to pay the taxes. An easement can sometimes lower estate taxes because it puts a Renton is bisected by major waterlines owned by the City of restriction on the property and thus, lowers the property Seattle Water Department. These may dually serv. Renton, value. The estate tax will consequently,be assessed on this as a form of regional trail corridors. lower value. Similarly,granting of an easement can in some cases reduce property taxes because assessment is based on Dedicated Easements the property's market value. If an easement restricts this value,then the tax will be reduced. Trail routes can also be acquired through dedi ted ease- ments. An easement is a legal agreement a property owner There are a variety of different easements,which are named makes which grants arrpcs through a portion or his or her according to the resource they protect or the purpose that property or restricts the type and amount of development they serve. Obviously,a trail easement is nerPccary for trail that may take place on the property. The terms of each use purposes,but these can be combined with conservation, easement vary with every case,including the specific rights a historic preservation,and scenic easements. For example, property owner forgoes when granting an easement. By the Pacific Coast Railroad Trail would utilize a railroad granting an easement which preserves a natural land re- right-of-way that was important in Renton's history. Conse- source and provides public access to this resource,)the grantee quently,the City might be able to acquire a historic easement may gain a sense of personal satisfaction in contributing to 'in addition to securing a trail easement through private improved quality of life and the environment. Yet one of the property. Both a conservation and scenic easement might be more compelling incentives for a property owner to grant an dedicated for the May Creek Corridor and trails that pass easement are the tax benefits. Granting a recreational and/ through it. or educational easements can reduce a property owner's Trust for Public{ Land,Land Trust Ps6ange,The Conservation Easement iHandbook,1988 City Wide Master Trails Plan Land Trades To qualify for State and Federal funding for trails purposes usually requires the requesting jurisdiction to already have Another means of securing trail right-of-way can be through established a Comprehensive non-motorized transportation the use of land trades. These trades are not necessarily based plan. An adopted plan demonstrates to State and Federal ' on a direct acre for acre basis,but on a trade in land of a agencies a commitment by the City to reducing the prevailing certain value--for a specific purpose.This may be an espe- dependence on personal motor vehicle transportation. cially useful tool in the case of filling missing links along trail , routes. A property owner,resistant to donating or selling an FEDERAL FUNDING easement might be persuaded to do so if the City had surplus property to offer in trade. This surplus property may be of Federal funding requires from 10 to 50%matching funds and special interest to the property owner who controls a parcel often needs an approved detailed comprehensive trails plan , necessary for trail development. as a condition of eligibility. Appendix C summarizes the po- tential Federal funding sources for bicycle facilities,includ- Condemnation ing their purpose, legislative authority, and administering agency. Sometimes a portion of the proposed trail is held by an unwilling seller. If no alternative parcel can be acquired or Community Development Block Grant if that parcel represents a missing link in the trail,the govern- (CDBG),Dept.of Housing&Urban Development me:,cal jurisdiction involved may act to condemn the prop- ., erty. Though only used as a last resort,municipalities do Block Grant funds finance sidewalk improvements in low have the right of eminent domain to acquire private property and moderate income neighborhoods. They also can be used _ for public use. for park and open space provisions in these communities. CDBG funds were utilized to construct the urban portion of The King County Urban Trails Plan states that "The legal justificationthe Cedar River Trail. Block'grant funds could also help for condemnation for trail purposes may be sufficient under existing law. However, to improve the finance the development of the Honey Creek Trail. probability for success,specific enabling legislation should •. . �,,y � .tea,. include the right of condemnation for: K'" it J ` s 1a '•..,4. a.Easements for paths and trails to scenic areas. • ` ;. - z .,. -. b.Easements to plant and maintain shrubs and trees '_ ` ,.4, `-. 1 along rivers and parks. ": �`.' :' - " "L� t c.Easements to prevent the erection of buildings and �T�*.'� ,' �', ' 'k :-- '_� ,a billboards in the vicinity of parks or trails." - 3. FUNDING SOURCES , '-` `'_• - _- =: Funding sources are necessary for acquisition and develop- r M °` ment of trails.The most effective means of raising the capital Community Development Block Grant funds were used to nerscary to implement a trails plan requires leveraging and construct the urban portion of the Cedar River Trail coordination with other agencies and projects. Cooperation with the City Public Works Department, State Highway Department or the U.S.Army Corps.of Engineers can lead National Trail Designation,National Park Service to joint development of trail corridors.Projects which can be - developed in tandem with trails are sewer installations,high- A nominated trail becomes a component of the National way construction,and flood plain management. This type of Trails system. Usually, the publicity and status associated coordination,commonly referred to as "piggy-backing,"si- with this designation results in increased financial support multaneously meets utility,transportation,recreational and from the public, private, and corporate sectors; increased flood control objectives. protection to the trail itself;and a greater community focus. S 1Vaospoctation Planning and Engineering.Inc.City of Bellevue-Compcsbmiiw Non- Mdacfred Transportation Plan Recommendation,1979 1 - 70 - City Wide Master Trails Plan . National Trail designation also helps to foster outdoor rec- River Conservation Assistance Program reation in many localities along the trail's route. This program focuses particularly on those rivers of local and The National Trails System is composed of four types of regional importance that are unprotected through formal trails: national recreation trails, national scenic trails,na- programs such as the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Poten- tional historic trails,and connecting or side trails. l'slational tial candidates for this program are the cell a River and May recreational trails provide for numerous outdoor recreation Creek Trails. activities in a variety of urban,rural and remote ars.6 ti National Scenic Trails such as the Pacific Crest Trail are STATE FUNDING long-distance trails that provide for maximum outdoor rec- reational pursuits and for the protection an enjoyment of Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation nationally significant scenic, historic, natural, or cultural features. National Recreational and National Historic Trails In 1964 Washington voters approved two affiliated measures can be shorter length and are more appropriate for urban designed to launch a new conservation and outdoor recrea- trail designation. Lion program for the state. Initiative 215,the Marine Rec- , reation Land Act,set aside state unreclaimed gas tax to buy waterfront land and provide facilities for aquatic recreation. The legislature has since authorized additional bond issues. f ;•; f: , / '' �-• Initiative 215 created the Interagency Committee for Out- 1.4! -4 , ''4I 4:V door Recreation(IAC)to administer these state funds and to '°'aT '- `. manage Federal Land and Water Conservation Funds under i. ; �„ the direction of the National Park Service. Outdoor Recreation Grant Program This grant program provides funding for outdoor recreation r �Yf projects. Public agencies use these funds to acquire and/or f F>' s`"� develop land and facilities for their outdoor recreation pur- �' f*qt. �.a.. ? .'� �. poses. 3.ipsd�l M1 � ,;;,/�+4.�.. - ,. ,.��nSfr:. poses. 4` Eligible projects are considered for funding if they: This handsome footbridge was constructed jointly by the City of Tukwila,the water and power companies needed to run a 1. are in accordance with the State Outdoor Recreation pipe and cable across the Green River.Building th bridge Plan(SCORP). was cheaper than tunneling under the river the City could not afford to build the pedestrian bridge on its own! Their . 2. guarantee adequate maintenance and operation. combined efforts enabled the Christianson Trail to extend across the river,south of S. 180th Street. 3. are operated for public outdoor recreation. 4. meet priorities identified in the local comprehensive Some regional examples of National Recreation Trails are: park plan. The 2.5 mile Lake Washington Shoreline Trail,the 3 mile Discovery Park Loop Trail, both in Seattle; the 2.5 mile Funds are allocated on a 50%matching fund basis between Bayside Green Trail in Tacoma;and the 94 mile Wonderland state and local agencies. If Federal funds are also to be Trail around Mt.Rainier.The Oregon Trail is an Wonderland of provided,the local jurisdiction must pay 50%of total project a National Historic Trail. cost with the balance to be split by the State and Federal governments. Renton's potential candidates for National Trail designation are: the Cedar River Trail, the May Creek/Honey Creek Washington State Wildlife&Recreation Coalition Trails, Black River Trail, and the Pacific Coast Railroad Trail This is a state wide bond issue to fund projects that protect ' U.S.Dept of inustioc,National Put Service,Natielial Recreational Trait'p.3 T City Wide Master Trails Plan wildlife habitat, foster recreation, and provide means of acquire the north sector of the Honey Creek Trail(up to the environmental education.Priority is given to those sites that confluence with May Creek)through this funding source. meet the above qualifications and are under the greatest development pressure. The City must match the amount of funds offered by the State for each project. The May Creek CITY FUNDING greenbelt and specifically,the area proposed for the western May Creek Trailhead was awarded $376,000 by this bond General Fund issue. The City has some obligation to fund a portion of the cost of _ Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) developing a trail system. In return, the City will receive significant benefit from that system in terms of being more Mitigation from the realignment of Interstate-405 will pro- attractive to new economic development,an improved sense vide funding for trail development: WSDOT is responsible of community and self-image,and potentially even improved for the entire State's Transportation Plan. Consequently, traffic flows and commuting ease. Specifically,the City has WSDOT must be equally concerned with non-motorized dedicated a portion of gas tax revenues for trail system forms of transportation as with motorized transport. WSDOT development.The fund is growing at a rate of about$150 per works with a Bicycle Advisory Committee on bicycle related month. In addition,the City could decide to allocate addi- issues• tional general fund revenues to trail construction if deemed necessary or appropriate. COUNTY FUNDING Public Works Funds County Wide Bond Issues School Walkway Program - In November 1989 King County voters approved a $117 $50,000 was budgeted for the 1989 School Walkway Pro- million bond issue which will tax property owners for pur- gram. These monies are designed to provide for safe walk- poses of acquiring open space and development of trail ways between schools and neighborhoods. corridors. The Public Works Department has developed an extensive Six Renton projects were included in the Bond Issue. Most sidewalk program for the City.Trails that follow street right- of Renton's projects were for the acquisition and develop- of-ways can take advantage of this development program. ment of its comprehensive trails program. The following Pedestrian trails which are coordinated with the sidewalk de- projects will receive funding from the Bond Issue: velopment program are:Lake Washington,Union,Burnett, and Devil's Elbow Trails. Cedar River Trail System Black River Riparian Forest/Heron Rookery In addition to locating trail right-of-ways along flood plains Combined Honey Creek and Pacific Coast Railroad and stream banks, coordinating trail construction efforts - Trails with public works projects can be very cost effective. For Springbrook Wetlands Trail example,a bike trail that requires restriping or paving of the Lake Washington Waterfront and Viewpoint shoulder should ideally,be constructed at the same time that Acquisition public works is doing improvements to that road. The per Interurban Regional Trail ton cost of asphalting is significantly cheaper if tied into.the whole road resurfacing,rather than if the shoulder is done King County Conservation Futures Tax Levy separately. t This is an ordinance passed by the County Council to allocate Similarly,the development of utility maintenance roads can funds for the purpose of acquiring parcels of land particu- help fund the development of trails that will also utilize these _ larly threatened by development or"conversion to a non- roads. open space use. Preference is given to those projects that were included in the 1989 Open Space Bond Issue. The Additional funding for the development of wetland trails County will match funds secured by the requesting jurisdic- may come from city funds designated for storm water man- , tion for up to 50%of the purchase price or will pay to secure agement. Some projects which may benefit from these an option to purchase (first right of refusal). Renton will efforts are: 7a . City Wide Master Trails Plan 1J I - Lov5 Wcr jlNy'roN -ta YI`�c L AIL A,o.t-+ o1„Z �t.R /_ \ ICM O%A TG�u� u y :. F IDtieY GfWE 1 '• I.ON . 1 �� TRA,l� • •P4F . uL' ' 1 ,' \ • Z. ,�V 11 I. KsV K Y \ 1 f f, ,is h! G /�l�D1l. �}eb• ,U • iII,- , (_ 'f4104'4-01.r50r." 1. _„ .••••• . 1.-W i •ir.ttp.!-t'a-:,-0ecaxr4 f` ceaaR w' Y der ,k: lSs: I' t• �.._�t-, L .1J ct-1 GM' uriI1 , l •I. A' INr fZe4N ; • ••••• GrrY AROJ ec-- °' i ! ,w. PLY • , li .5tt, wrt�u4tWrx,X.• I 11 I. sti+ •-.1 I? . PROPOSED TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE BOND PROJECTS Map of 1989 King County Open Space Bond Issue Projects for the Cty of Renton i I 73 City Wide Master Trails Plan 1) The Panther Creek Wetland Trail. Public Works plans Development Mitigation to dredge this swamp to create a larger storm,water capacity standing water (instead of mostly saturated The impacts of new residential and commercial develop- soil)wetland. The proposed boardwalk trail ystem ment on the city's transportation and recreation infrastruc- could be developed in conjunction with this storm ture must be mitigated against. Consequently,the planning water management/wetland enhancement project. process requires that new development pays to reduce these impacts,either through mitigation funds earmarked for this 2) The P-1 Channel Trail: The P-1 Channel may be built purpose or by directly building sections of a proposed trail to carry the City's increased storm water runoff as de- within their sphere of influence. velopment increases in the Valley. If constructed, a trail will be incorporated into the design which will The areas in Renton with the greatest potential to utili7P this parallel its course. funding source are:The Green River Valley and Black River Area,where shopping malls,new office,research and indus- 3) Honey Creek Trail. A parcel of land known as Loch trial parks are being developed;The Valley Medical Com- Norman is located on Honey Creek near the conflu- munity,which is expanding rapidly;North Renton,which is ence with May Creek. This site has been identified in experiencing industrial growth;South Renton,where large the May Creek Basin Plan as a location for a se liment residential development is occurring. control pond.The pond would be created by construct- ing a berm across the lower end of Honey Creek ravine. Local Improvement Districts To develop this siltation pond would require public works to improve the existing access road. This same Local Improvement Districts, commonly known as LID's, road is designated to serve as the northern p9tion of are areas where the property owners are assessed a special tax the Honey Creek Trail. Improvements to this road by based on the benefit of improvement to property value. This Public Works will thus help to develop the Honey collective fee is assessed on all of the property owners in a Creek Trail. given district whether they conduct business there or not. LID's are often developed before site plans or construction Sewer/Utility Lines: occurs. i Funds to install sewers and other utility lines can be coordi- nated with trails development if they follow along tl}e same 4. CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND right-of-way.The City of Seattle has made significant contri- STANDARDS butions to their trails program by"piggy-backing"onn3 sewer construction projects which entailed tearing up and repaving the streets. New bike lanes have been constructed Through One of the key elements for successful trails development is ' this process. good coordination of trails phasing and construction. The following cost estimates are only for trails master planning purposes.This section provides a calculated 1990 cost esti- -, mate,although some addressed items will be discussed later. There are many variables which can affect the overall con- struction cost. To arrive at the final cost, each trail will be calculated separately,and added together.The cost estimate for each designated trail segment was arrived at by measuring it's ( length and multiplying by a unit cost per linear foot of trail. Additional anticipated costs for trail segments are labelled and found in the chart.Drainage costs have been excluded because there are too many,design/construction variables to accurately arrive at a specified estimate. The trail types and descriptions,found in the cost estimation ( charts are generally depicted as follows:(see trails standards) i ry / 171 City Wide Master Trails Plan I. Paved-typically 12'wide,4"gravel,2"ACP Volunteers are trained through trail construction and II. Gravel/Dirt-These trails will vary in width, 3'-8'. maintenance workshops. There will be unit-price variations depending upon the trails,the number of predicted users,the type of A non-paved trail constructed by VOW can save up to trail users and what section of the city the route two-thirds the price of contracting out the job (plus passes through. materials costs). VOW has been an active force in III. Boardwalk-This portion of trail will be a raised trail building trails for the National Park&National Forest , on permanent piles which will pass over permanent Service(Mt.St.Helens,Mt. Rainier,Iron Goat Cen- water bodies. tennial Trail,Little Lake Kachess,Whitechuck Bench); City of Seattle (Lincoln, Ravenna, Green Lake,and The cost per linear unit figures were derived from numerous Interlaken Parks);City of Bellevue(Newcastle Beach compiled sources,depicted below.All unit figures have been Park wetland trails);and South King County(Jenkins adjusted at a 4%annual inflation rate,to reflect 1990 con- Park). truction prices.The sources and their abbreviations found in the Cost Estimation table are as follows: 2. Adopt-A-Trail Program. This effective citizen in- volvement program has drawn upon volunteers who FS National Forest Service Trails Construction agree to adopt a trail by working towards its construe- manuals tion and maintenance. The U.S. Forest Service and KERR Cost Data For Landscape Construction City of Seattle have very successful Adopt-A-Trail EST Compiled Trails Cost Estimates from local de- programs. Volunteers are trained and supervised by sign/construction firms skilled Parks Dept.and Forest Service employees and Parks Est. Compiled cost estimate via Renton Parks veterans. Department J.G.M. Jongejan, Gerrard, and McNeal Landscape Contrary to the myth that it takes more time and effort Architects, cost estimate for Cedar River to train volunteers that it does to pay already skilled Natural Zone contractors,these established volunteer programs have found they have excellent results from volunteers. These The final, rounded cost estimate of$9,544,000.00, in- people,donating their labor to trail development and dudes a 38% adjustment which reflects typical costs of maintenance, do so not because they have to, but today.Again,because this is a planning document,the many because they want to. While some volunteers may not design and construction alternatives may reflect higher or be dependable,there seems to be a substantial core of -- lower costs at that time. people that have demonstrated a keen commitment'to trails throughout Washington. The included tables summarize the pedestrian and bicycle cost estimations. Renton has a larger than average population of senior citizens. The retired community has proven to be an , _ Much of the cost of trail development is based on the labor excellent resource for volunteer trail work, having to build the trails. This is one of the most expensive aspects more time to spare,often lots of practical experience of trail development. Consequently,any efforts to reduce and skills,and a psychological need to keep active and j labor costs will in effect,reduce trail development costs. useful. Various methods can be employed to save on labor. Most of The Boy Scouts,Girl Scouts,Eagle Scouts,Explorers, these draw upon the various organized forms of volunteer 4-H Clubs,and Youth Conservation Corps are often ' labor. active in trail building. They could not only can help the City to realize its Master Trails Plan, but will , 1. Volunteers for Outdoor Washington. More corn- benefit greatly by the experience. Trail work will not monly known by its acronym,VOW,this organization only bring these youths in closer contact with nature, aims to promote volunteer stewardship of Washing- but will provide them with practical skills. ton's resources. This multi-faceted non-profit organi- zation puts many hundreds of volunteers to work each year on trails,beaches,and in parks throughout Wash- ington State. They have coordinated several outdoor -, organizations and government agencies to accomplish trail work in conjunction with National Trails Days. 7 - I �-t City Wide Master Trails Plan 5. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 6. PROGRAMMING TRAIL DEVELOPMENT To facilitate the implementation of the City of Renton Master Trails Plan,a trails steering committee will be estab- The timing of this trails master plan coincides with the fished that will be a mix of citizens,and representativesJfrom updating of the Parks&Recreation Comprehensive Plan, - the City's Parks,Community Development,Public Works, which guides the long-term development of Renton's park task Police,and Administration Departments. Thisk force and recreation system. Table 2 provides the recommended - should include members of walking/running,bicycling,and six-year trails development program,considered in the con- environmental organizations,as well as representatives of text of the City's overall comp plan. the business community. This committee will meet on a regular basis to monitor the implementation process,ensur- ing that efforts are coordinated between citizens, public agencies and City departments. In addition to the steering committee,citizen participation at the local community level can bring about very effective results. Involving the actual trail users,many of whom carry voting power serves a strong catalyst for action. The Urban Trails Plan proposed by King County in 1971 listed even , ways local citizens and citizen groups can best be involved in the trails implementation processes: 1. Stimulate political action to authorize the develop- ment of trails. - 2. Advise public agencies of local needs for trails , 3. Assume responsibility for construction and m inte- nance of certain trails or trail segments. 4. Provide or promote financial assistance for trails. 5. Seek private dedications or easements for trail pur- poses. 6. Promote the idea of trails to realize joint obj 'ves. _ • 76 TRAIL PRIORITY LIST DEVELOPMENT: D-1 Develop Cedar River Trail Natural Zone D-2 Develop Boeing Trail D-3 Develop Lake Washington Blvd. Trail System (Lake Loop) D-4 Develop Honey Creek Trail Corridor D-5 Develop Rainier Bike Trail (Lake Loop) D-6 Develop Abandoned Pacific Coast Railroad R.O.W. Trail D-7 Develop Black River Trail D-8 Develop Springbrook Valley Trail D-9 .Develop South w est 16th Bike Trail (Lind to Monster) D-10 Develop Devils Elbow Trail D-11 Develop Sunset Bypass Bike Trail (N.E. 12th) D-12 Develop Duvall)-Coal Creek Bike Trail D-13 • Develop Airport Perimeter Road Trail Systems D-14 Develop Cedar Crest Trail D-15 Develop Lake Youngs Waterline Trail D-16 Develop Cascade Waterline Trail D-17 Develop May Creek Trail Corridor ACQUISITION: A-1 Acquire Black River Trail Corridor A-2 Acquire May Creek Trail Corridor - A-3 Acquire Lake Washington Vistas A-4 Acquire Springbrook Wetlands Trail Corridor A-5 Acquire Abandoned Pacific Coast Railroad R.O.W. A-6 Acquire Springbrook Valley Trail Corridor A-7 Acquire Honey Creek Trail Corridor A-8 Acquire Lake Washington Boulevard R.O.W. A-9 Acquire Cedar Crest Trail Corridor '77 , . .... . , • .... , , .r'`-• , ,N,-. .,,,,, -_, • 1 i ,; ', --J-------.,.. . , , , - , ‘ •1 N--\J----- ._-, , .. . ...• :... 1 • 1 ,, ., , '- •-• .- -r.,..-, „. : ••.•• 1..,.,1...: . \ ...‘•N! ' ....--.s-.....-..‘•‘•.__ -,, ' ' .08 .1 • • '''.. ' t%\ ••2 ' „'.•• !. • I D \: '", --- , .- , , •• ... •-• , : -- ., I, --\b \.' i • —, ., , \ -•„• \.,_ . *r...-?'.' ;?1.75* Vi.,-LP.,7.-1 ------,,' ,itl-,..•-• „..--- • . ,-\---,,,..._ ,..„•:,f;s•-ialio. .,!.`' :.';'''';i''''' - , ...._. -,.., ,--, ..• [.,(.•-:•P•••-.t.-.:1.i,. ..7:e . •.;,,,,,,x,....A...„.... ‘..- .. :•,..•:•.; •••.4,., / '''',,ire:'..Q.S4..yk N,•=."-- ,'''';•---' ',!•..,.. .-,vik,.. '''''7::!st---'';'3,`,..•-----:::,'•••••7;'''.:4- :s".-,••;,,•?.7.1;-S.,;^-,.1.: — r +.• ":44. ,-•.;.;:%.,:',..:7:1..Z'l.•----- •A::;.k:Z.-:...---4,...,_ -' 4..4.C...i.A ---- ii••••:1-14',...... '-'------'-'---/..- •'-:••-.;:.'".•.•:•:•z-,',. •-•-•-•, aik•••,....._ l'i, I '•.••:-;1,.., ' 1 . 4-5 - .- . • rt.lim=jimi. .'4 1. . , S ' 1 ,,,,,,1 . - -- . . -,. ../ ...-:,.-:... i .7:r . - . ,.... , 1' r-• 1 I .,,,s . , •.." ..... ! .r • ---- "--P ..... ...... . '1 111•.=•• •1 • t,. ... 4 I , ..., .. . ....,N -..-- •!' t-. • -- -‘4....---1,' • --`,-------- j-.../ .1 ii. , 1 . ,`...'' •„,...j ... .,. -_- -,4•,.'• ......."-..., ••• -L ,I , g .• ."- ''''"' 'w 1 '::<;. • --. • L••,.1i —...i . r— • A:.. 1-1 I . , • - - s 'k---- \—, • .., • . , , ,. -• . 1 •._ _ 1 • •.... ... , '• !.,_,,PL- ..-.— ''',,,, Qt..---...:,---../ ...___bl-E--Atil-St.. • --%. i'l •.' •r: " , , - iv." • ' '' - 's ' • • ...,'‘ v•--; ...• ‘../1 , , I ,-N,„ L . \ ..c.,,i'::*•.!•-')'.4,,i,,;-S.,•-•-,,\ - . .,L•,,,,,- . ,. ir'.,.,-, •,,,:,,,r::.4:f,:„*., ,,,,.. .... .., - ' ..:,,. --,.. '-41:,:...-.7,,,,,Q.--;:-. ..,:ri.!,,.:.... • . • ,,,,,- ..,4s,5-s...,•:T. •- .. i ''',,,•..i,..._ ..1.-... '',---: ..- ••.:....'-.:,,,,,,, „ ,.....,.....---- \ . , , \•••:?,.....,1(;.,...,,,,,-.....:-...A,i,.,,:i..27.:.,,,,;,..„: . -,..,;4.7.,!1.,.: •,,•". . , ..,, •. ..\\. . 1 „...- i \ t . '" . 1- .j.',.=.::.:Fi."-..f':;...c:• ---:-.7tt)-Zr;t-F---;... .-', :::, .. • *1 „-:-,..•,4,--,..,...2,...p-z.,,,,.t. •-.,--N,-1...0,:g- •••••.-• ---- •...,.. - • ----, •• ..1•::.,-27„,!..,o.T.•••;:),......,.... • vf,,;•••z.-.;.:,...ft:,.,.Pe-La,'•-i•-•-••.:5 . , —-z!---..:•.e. t •••Z•14.i. -&:,---.;:t.:, --, . ..: • --...01111111 -77 --- 4-.0 • .f);(.... tc,"' . .......;.,...t.. •. •---A v -q:,-.74,,"Fez..ip;.;,.7:,. • c.".. k -••• _7 "7._..:".. t 4 '_.....:,0 • 1;1'. • ,-.Z.' '.. ./.'e .• '•'' i:-.fil ciA4,,.`1.e.:,'-,-- .----' % 1---,... I ...-- ‘ '. . .`"` ! 4 i 4 . :• „...›.-.- •••\AI ti - •,.:_gv.•.•:,•:;,,,,AI,. -...„,(_.„...-:!...,, • ... •••,... P,P5 '1-.....e,..4 /:1. ' (:(. 1.‘ t' . ,:.) . I'I ..:'• • i i• • :=-'• .II'. ...'-'-‘ r.M.=a . '. :-.7 t/.,S5!4'• •.--,...-_.(._. . - •`•:;11,42 it A • • . , ,:• (- . . ... . •• , .... • • „ . .67__. ...,„ .____..._.____ ) ef.•-• ,,•-•- . kr-'''',. ..1-,, •-•-1, 1 N.4.24)-44•• • • .., . . ,,z• 1: ,-......,... • : , ,*er, .. y . • ... ,,, -- - ,,-_ ,-.,...w.„.• 1 \ ....,:liri.7.:,.. ‘ Al , . 1 ' ,- ..7c.,.,.,..,-.4.... ri...7.:4-,t, k '...,,i4.....• t.. _. /. i 1., ''',--::*V-'. " , ..:)..- , • . — --1....,.,) i ..,........____ I =..1 -‘,-,• > .,,.' , • -,47: - ..„'i0i . 1 , j :-147XC!,,:afke;:Yk;. / \ •\ ' 1' I.j::01 i r'''.4.\ i- , • .. . _,,-,..,...116;.`..-•,,., . • ., I Pk= :- j ' i ; ' r ,/• ; •,%-1.1.1 ':. i' \1 1 ' / • ..- I/,.i••t.::;,i, . ; I 5,1, ', . : (-r--1-- 4, : /7: ..",it: : 1 O. A 1 • , I\'';'•- \-\ • ..„,./. -•!• , ..:,,-•-•----: —_ .. 'i• : 1 ; . s-..\-•"'"•-•, 1 •----4•\.---- 1 . 1 li ' '‘<.- • ' .•-• ' --V ci "."; '.• _1 \_/I • •.-;c-,--,•.-.4... r- N-••_,I...,..1......,, -.; ..._. : 4,...14 •. .-:,— ,:s. . -;••:-.... 1 • , 1, P k G 11 kV -311i t.•10.112111 ars/ reennelts :CI?: ' NORTH 0 .25ml .50rm 75m1 1.00m1 [ ) NE&JOR VEHICLfIAR E‘FRiSTRUCTURT MERCER I �(I F , _•7-L.1.. f � : ,• .. ISLAND GA i } � r y (• • b`Z�wv 1 111 jic\ri . / ‘ • , ...• *. I t 8 i \ /.' I ..!.... ,r.'-0, , / :- ' ..."' / . , . , \, . Kt\\ (' .... .--• \ iji ,ip� l i 1, t t4. \ • • ? ..,./,,,,:,„. ...a .,,i7.1.1 tilIV.,..7,1'1',41-7-r-;.- -- le•'" ' 471 •' lti \li° 9' a9 _ I• �. Ij ;r.: ; li tilit+` � ( � 7 er\!; 11=. i1 ,tsiisl..i .'�[y.. ' ra. immi -`' ~ �1I'��1r'1 1 .,b:�}, Aillifil.`ffi4c'�(YI t 1 �c1y • �` e .�1 I r '.' LEI"� 1 1=..:':#i'�,. r 9 i 1 . ii',is�11 .,�'` �!!��l kZe ' 's� :i:>:. •:�i taf^p 9 .:�• _s_I'a`,'isWIi :? s.:•,•57:t.:: _4 y :- y N\ 1••`Q - 11��n.JA i�G��f tl;,.�r>.-t; _ _R•(%t of 441"•:P3-1 ,,..11 ii41.4;1t 1 n O t5 II•• 1\ 1 �. ����IIIII�: o a;`, taian:i?.J.. e ,.l _ �t ` '�! :::1! 1 IH C1 I'_' 7. �1a't r.t�ri,,.J'�:;::� - �7..:2 ..._.. �(;y tv.,��6; •.wc,; � 1� B ,�IrI�rs���IFI? ,. boat;• li � � l_� -,,. 1 Jr�.a.�,• ��q i''\�r. ., w`' O ,t �-� T.•j`.'��"L.'_ram• Odh■ �, 6 W'�•:�• 71 : �-_ �e;', �.(�-t' 14n o:`/i \` uaa R ..:7;e.,: 7 .52(14 45:��,�r�+i' .:"'re '� • �"' °i"'E���}!� Ar a tj�1�� •e,-:'-;ts or. - Ir :,e `• •1!•;tc { \ yi ... 1. ._ 14:gtk.:11;e$1 ,;,,,% '� �fad-e'� a 6T,' C:a;.y � '- ���':_d a�=-°3 1zy �' ,�.`:::.:"._-`.�4b!1 p, 1 , o� . „�,, .' ,'45 r r}•�IG T ,•� I�^,• L1!i ;r� IilliNtradaP*. , '-•'SilR.,} •'�,,e 'aii�. '\' , "f ,G't'? .1„ ' r'.i�4 :�Fi„A ''�``bp .fi0' .i•, S, ..1 __, , 4 1 " o t] 1 µg t '�^ NF�,f' .c fy, ,:; isT!•%!: -,� .AnS� �7 1 .` y-i t (I r�ti�\, 1.P4,,,.7.a ?it.... i1��,• -v '' /' '•1.A.I ■ I1tJ ''. i-. !seii(- 'P '-• 1- iiv I,.m, .. ;:i! '� _ md:f:'I '' ~ •Per -0 ✓/-• .1 it • s=( Y'r, �I a.. ) o:`` •.' �+s'"� '` . t�i.,� � �` f •�1;R•k'✓� 116'f7•ttiosioz* �, . E�Qtt\� :rl��•••I I 1+i 116Itt�¢ =yw • �f•\., `r./ ' ��.k'"1, . /• q I��I :' �.1A• > :: ekZ1} '� � i I •t l I, Ir,, 1 i :rlllWs1:7_:C a ht• ��� r l4a'.:t �,,rri':�dl +' _ -I .1 ! ;,.,ir I v i, 0 i 1 I �C ;: 0 a' .�iiism .air•. { • i\` . :_y a (� _, ;1 ,1y:i :,l ;,;r 7 o lin y ul�lrr -� tr1' .;:�r:,f aatet5,7 „` I , .h• 1t'11 r � 11l • • �:•[: ) ,..: l 1 r., Y Y ••• f f I s �l 11 k 1-:ac ii 1 i 1,$$I'i,._:y, i av�•w •/i i` {:l+' , 11+.h.,u: SG°YIYYJP I Ali;t L� ___ It��� u,,,• �i11 lib. �Ik.t _ i ,,,,,.,,....,„.:„.,„,„,„,,.v.„.„..,_: . r � -=r._,., 4 E _ ;;f',i('i•;,� ��-: � h.�' I �1�i 1I i_ i; ••,y, _„�j[ gh �: �.�,�•�I�q_� 1 ....�-- . E`1-its�w,��F •�7�2�F,.��I-=EF,-;�sy.:•� 1� frill; tll 'Jt ] �I �vf7R _`S ��``.�i.;:1,1::\4.,..;:;:v614,1571i:Ile.:,7� �l i''�� I �, - 1 1 •�+.. .. ..I° _)' ,•7- --�=7 •�• *y� _ � _.� ��E_�, ., � !;,,,,,,,,-.1::::.-i," 1 i( „�' � :ram.. f.!:.,gsp �gi -E€ilft l ti, .i>. ,I ,i.:i f ril ; ii . (t-J rid.=i` G •I A h i�,,rill ' ' = 11,-c:B to _ I� ' .:1!,,..r 1' .41:lif!�' ,f b. � +�I�I� ( mv.` g, = . 1 1 _1.� -1 I 1' I .-..,°a/l1• • I�_I n'�$•F�yf'f.r:..io-,,✓11, ,II i 1 !!l�n: I 'tla....7 gPya I_ i.•1:1" 'I•• -�•L1 ..I. ° s �y G e�C�% `'J fa=i:,!,,.A�' 1•,ic.�_I li, i 1 - i / I' l �K . i t I, #•_v,,^. . 1 €I ik y!!! ut;1'.7�: .5' t_ i t ,-• 1. ..11c ,4t,: � 1 O.. ` I• " I - ! 1 �v'4 l\,� ""�Iiii rlli. a,)..:�.1, ••(.� 1 JJ� T•• �.J �7,a t71�'�ilt ,\�l'� 1 !` 1 t! I •• .1/, 4' li \ "1 11,, ',.•-- 1 //Pjjl ry. \� s •I:. •!Iry• .y, L•:• �:. Ill `:. � �`'l.J:�.; I � 'l^ .�.:•}1�,Y� I 1.".F--,:gfix;,ia,,P,,;6,,,,,;!",------„ia,," ����44J.��� �'�.� i• l` , l I.�(�n°7.1g,t: ✓ .ter. It,� ^1 ..5 ! .•ui,.i'�4 �Ild -- - _ � '-I i 491` 7 IE a .4 '� tom' .;P-. ( (c a L•. r.'-i' • .. i :, ,i I i�a .;;. .; 4 r p 7- ,4F. I , �•: ` ll4.'. . t':, '� GAP ` �!HI•,I 1 •I: �j `7-Li�%�/}t\•;i..l .I /_•�IrI_i.'1.7••i .`is ';�jI[t ,•.el /� Iiigis. ........ .... .. .4 • 1. •.'- ,tu i 0'�'. i, �•'•_ it C'.ic qrill, f/l '`. " -i i I _.. it nl!? ' 1"'.._ `'..I 41 1q�ypi:i.l • }I.rzi',�\ir,. p.il0 cliilli!1 ...II lbh“,'ai t Fi.0 '>l �tr�er': i • I L c1 I ..14111...., •'•I^�,"'•,%' ^ "1P - ty.. r ..,4/' �"-' 1,�.1(;��Fir• ��• t .. 6. •.. L •' 1 .tic. air_ .i..• 1 i l r / t"!,� t! r L:1 :a a; 1-0 . ;• llp!•,`', I�' J•i�.�� "� t'fl]`i^I�_t�.r:_�.� T �� \ t �"� y I Jr I !, ! 4•;._„a _._. .: l d I�" 1 q /„jyu a �.1 �T"�'i�►t I s: ;i Ri`-;a Gt ct � d i ! 'bY`• f,'''!t 't:'' 7'�,1�o` ' ' . 'Ii./,:v.,i,.. / °j,j7 r �' i. ai:is„,.. _ - •ai�'}y�6��'•gY .:$''+do- 0 ay .. >8i8•�.1:• . •� �• rn G�ole �•�;�d fi/���* �+I;,Y711 ll . ).i1� .� ! - � V 1 � .7.'. 1S .I/' v��'�'Y ..ve,��ll�, ����� r •yl�:r � 3' �rrr�� \•.. S Y ; r _a,y i / is'-.Fiy °'`t'' Wm;;tS3�/��, "I.:. ,y„',: ]Jai, c. 1 r •1r °' °,;;.•`2 4 ., � •�>5. ae•6.�ti`V pp1 I .•' �-?..�v�\�\pr ',o �f.:..�t:'-^( ✓!t•' !ice ,4♦+•'rii.' :-[ .� t�J S'• �g': � 'P\r•; .�`j��-•t S[ ;�1 f-ty � �� �� �. " I' �--�- � •' ��^• a `JfJ; t 4'i'y''��.P.'01e.1 .1 _I. . \k.t\ : '-•1�p, ':\'•. . _fl...`. 1. � ', �1; j9p':r.Ji ! 3J ig1, ' - '° '�`� ✓t��� ti 6- ! '„tit, {:ji€9•.3 e t r 3 ° -- � i\. .' s\a :•a, .,•y'as.-c '\(i•,y nth ti�€, ... '�'_---y�`:� (s, %3- _ i'-I I o ,0 1 _F.• ��T• i.'9: , •.���a. Q .=t:.. t. :• Co •ora,t_ I b : r,•`f to /+' (ry14....' _ d r� !cl fvf v r',I `:a:. •9�r ''- i,-.._� a ..7R• '' - _ -r_.__1 \ �Ie�1: '' �''.,'ruv'orav\ ..a. ..�i'f:- .,it. � �4•' rK`'' N _I f1,.. ! . i _y._ r, 1' i•1- . / .�' rl' ,r,,441 1`�_ii�:no°ola i•o• Ra.:f!r•,,,T ce vw. u'-`` ''','•'N$i,t14,7+ . �.- 1 , • �• s�. 1 a�l ••• l\e 9 e ° o t :.1' r ik •r•�; (e. •4: Sy�'.:"i• Q '` w[i "�gg a / °° !I'�/, :i ' r:':h;ri'••n� n•,, , t r 2?,.k J1..�� �.L• iu. i - Y.,,. I .~..'r'. �1{v a I 05:2:1. 9,�.. ......::.�1 •h •......•f:,':''.r °t?\ y�F•t` ` nr. o. 90 I1 r _ -- .%.� / '1, �,••;.�::',ItS' ......._ 17a{!r '6',;•.;:y:.t,ra1:d.;i�� 'r,. r.t" 4�'T'tYvt�?:•' r��y0 .II ,s I �.r:.�•••~ �•'%:7i:F.. -,�li•..•t'�,n.`I,t,+../,, :iy!�.'},''•.V ,r fti\Y' �_o. t 1 ;r1".. '% ,•� 1Ii?.r )EThy (:%� °vs; , �t;i�ttiJ:�;.1•:ri', *C'n v� 1 ,•c, • -ttagi: ?I=. !l` .. •,l' ,° �+ P :`'?;•>5�.,Inni,�i•P•.,�,1, �1�`.iji.`��S`.'.•%':.;r�:= O. �(, "''' _q'L. `Aiil_' II -.... r. . •. i \ , i a •fit t lit, :rr,s _li 3 / y.._ e\' � .`.. 1 Ip`,;,%�.^\i ./ '`_4\�� k /. //!1�✓' '= `1--` =.i. _ ,,�` 5 '%'ilk,,.. : ;a: �' t' I c�1 ( ti I�j ct�PJ,: <'J f a•�x7\c.a'a, i { , . 11 III �•� sl4. J r► Ir;." l:,; iti f' e, •.� III I�1 F•' .. t1..iEFS}, _•'! , `� ... ••',i A (1C•Y.�4•\:.\'. t,',:% t`' .y..•] • � t il• �1 / � i 1:i' .I::: !� ��•Aig ` \ { {.,• 'Ii�l] �',4�::.1 i.irµ,r� �.Is , a •r e' t 11 ;. 's:l,\Poi Wit `�•oa I�-•.'•``.•:i•�:•'u�:F:air. 4.' .5;; t.4. lt'a.!o:; „ry. • (I .... of ..tLn `SI zr.•., p•::: t ` ,,',r^a tC .\ . 11 1'D _. -•• Ay n.,..,... .,il/ilbil t. liil�i�►,bl AWNusx• .•.-.,ta, ia'•.•;:•a......;,,;?iT�•..'c:.9i.:.. ' '.t„/'J.'?;' - I� dp'•• .,,..., n.7.�' 1 R„ 1 :••u�11.1 ruiia .cu..'``.__. ... 'F Alf am I' I '• •Y• ... i':` 11y7•. '_!'.:4�� I YJu.�- "�,efv nn ) L.fr .M_: i!.��:IeiS�,:..u,l::!"...:. ... ��. �. ' , I _ _ _f.,,:Y. ,,. U \.]...-1 , ." ' ' ' • { ',j„t';L,Jri ,•'fl.L'' gpr:::: �n;;,rr(!��\``''d• 1ra ••�'' t.;�1, fF� �.r 11' •,�. • ':t�r: l 1\�s^'2i•11 )i':'i6 .�. 71D111rW::G'IG�`��.,;--'�'i.i I ( all j'. ° .48 C"'ii•'i1i ri?;!i" {:_1 i:a7, - 1 (f`/ a 1 �I Al_. �� .- • .Fl� .i-�I` ,`�.4.„a,..:!• 11.•.a ✓ 4__._. 11.I I 11 4• .3:(y;,:::. n!,111, , .4ctIII ii ...1 WM . � �• '' :ly, �l1i( 1 J ' •L I I : •. I• �I ii . Till 1 �D i • is_ = :, ...'"1 surrilitYt,_:. liq,11 .? ', 1 ,r 1. •.) 1 1 1' \ ..zr.,........„.\.. .. ti.ilinittM , . J.,„, ,,,, ' NUM MA ,.,...,for9i$L.\\.'" I i f: • r/ ill !l 1 �e.9"- N• • ). �� IL.. ` // i P:.:;.i.i..... • ..' I.id, . - .so, r It I '..\ 1/js , ..1.1illi.. ..".-- ' . i11... .......:::: .......... ill / i411'47'-'1:‘111 ,�'. \\ \ : _ a! It ,v �I 1 41111‘‘'ll I ii I ° CITY WIDE. MASTER TRAILS D0 CITY . OF RENTON PARKS & R. ECREATIO N 0 ❑ . . EDAW • ATTRACTIONS & NODES ""'°"""°"""" TransPottatlon Planning& nglneer.ng Parks/Other Raedeke Associates Schools Recreation• Major Employment Centers Other Jurisdictions e/. ` '"T • Commercial Attractions ,,.:., !!'•iiii Significant Enviornmental : ; Institutions s.�DD (Existing) 0 m .w ,(' ..... Features • (Proposed) ' ,i Cfh'' Parks/Other Recreation CC Plopcls3:cl Parks 000p Potential Residential ---------- --- !N••1•'•.t�A5. City of Renton Ilrvolnnmenl _1 i t --' (limilinilminnillimuimmimimilLOSSARY Aesthetic: A pleasing appearance or effect. Flood Plain: The land bordering a river or creek subject to flooding. Amenity: A pleasurable or aesthetic feature. Fragile Area: An area that contains steep slopes,marsh,or Arterial: Of or designating a main route of transportation other conditions contributing to potentially hazardous topo- j carrying a main flow of traffic with many contributing branch graphic, geologic or hydrologic features. Containing or roadways. substantially contributing to the maintenance of endangered or valuable forms of life. Attraction: Something that evokes interest or admiration. Gateway: A recognized access or entrance to a city,typified __ Bike Lane: A designated path exclusively for bicycles. by something out of the ordinary. - Boardwalk: A walk constructed of planks;usually on,over, Goal:.A goal,is a general aim or desired end;a broad,long 1 or adjacent to a body of water. range purpose toward which policy decisions and action are directed. The term is used to connote a very general, long Buffer: An area which separates and protects one type of use range achievement or performance level,which may require from another use or a subuse within a use. implementation from the combined operation of varying levels of government,or coordinated agency operations at - Central Business District(CBD): The central area of a city any one level of government. characterized by shops,offices,hotels,etc.,converging tram- ! portation lines,and general higher land values. Greenbelt: A contiguous belt of trees,shrubs,and vegeta- tion that surrounds or lies adjacent to a community. - Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan is the offi- cial statement of the City which establishes major policies Hub: The central part of;a center of activity. that are intended to guide the growth and development. Incompatible Uses: A use which will have conflicts with Conduit: A natural channel through which something is existing and/or proposed uses within a given area. conveyed. I Infrastructure: The underlying foundation or basic frame- Constraint: A state non-advantageous toward performing a work of a city such as streets,and utilities. particular action. Landscaping: The addition,modification,and/or retention Corridor: A defined geographic area having similar features of trees, shrubs, ground cover, rockeries, land-forms, and such as waterbodies,vegetation,and transportation routes; similar items designed to achieve desired effects,which shall which has potential for future or present trails routes. include,but is not limited to,enhancing aesthetics or ameni- ties, screening, providing wildlife habitat, and controlling ( Development: Any physical addition to land that increases surface water. - its utility,beauty,income or value. Linkage: The manner or style of being united. District: A distinct part of the City distinguished by its location,uses or features. Mitigation:Appropriate compensation back to a site and/or -- Easement: A right afforded a person to make limited use of the surrounding area for developments such as residential or anther's real property,as the right of way. commercial structures. Ecosystem: An ecological community together with its Mouth of River: The part of the wider lower lower course of physical environment,considered as a unit. a river where its current is met and influenced by another water body;i.e.an estuary. Feasible: Capable of being done or carried out. City Wide Master pails Plan Multi-Use Trail:A trail to be used by two or more group user. Section: A two-dimensional drawing, which depicts any groups.i.e.bicycles,pedestrians,equestrians.. terrain and its landscape features by representing it as though it is a pie which upon being cut in half,displays the crust and Neighborhood: An area devoted to residential and residen- filling for study. tially oriented uses(schools,parks,etc.)whose residents are generally conscious of its existence as an entity and have Shopping Center: A group of buildings,structures,and/or informal face-to-face contacts and some social institutions uncovered commercial areas planned,developed,and man- they recognize as their own.The area is normally of sufficient gaged as a unit related in location and type of shops to the size to support an elementary school and is usually bounded trade area that the unit serves. by arterials,natural barriers,or non-living areas. Sub-Regional: A sub portion of a geographic area corn- Node: A spot in a city which is an intensive foci,such as a prised of multiple jurisdictions. break in transportation, a crossing, or a convergence of paths.This may be simply concentrations of activities. Suburbia: Collectively,usually residential area or commu- nity outlying a city. Objective: An objective is a specific purpose, product or performance level;a middle range of achievement. Several Switchback: A trail that ascends or descends a steep incline objectives can be proposed to achieve a given goal. A in a winding course. coordinated group of objectives may be required to attain a goal. Trail: A marked or established path or route; a course followed or to be followed from one place to another. Open Space: A portion of the City which has not been developed and which is designated to be preserved in its Trailhead: A designated place at which a trails begins, natural state for outdoor recreation use,wildlife habitat,or usually consisting of signage,informative kiosks,restrooms, similar uses,or to minimize potential hazards. Open spaces parking,etc. also includes parks,squares,yards,courts,and other urban spaces not covered by structures or used for transportation. Transitional Area: An area that is in the process of changing from one use to another. Opportunity:A favorable condition for trail development. Unique:The characteristic of being different from all others Policy: A definite course or method of action selected from in a given area;having no like or equal;unusual. among alternatives,which based on conditions,guides and determines present and future decisions Urban: An area whose character has been changed with the development of land from a rural or undeveloped state to Promenade: A raised structure for a leisurely walk,usually that of a city or town. for viewing. Use: The purpose of activity for which a piece of land or its Public Interest: That which is of concern or benefit to all the buildings is designed,arranged,or intended,or for which it residents of the City, including future generations, as op- is occupied or maintained. posed to the concern or benefit of special interest groups. Utilities:Utilities are that segment of urban services provid- Regional:Ageographicarea comprised of multiple jurisdic- ing for the transmission of fluids, communications,or en- tions. ( f ergy,including,but not necessarily limited to water,sewage, telecommunications,electricity,natural gas,and storm wa- Right Of Way: A designated legal right of passage over a ter. piece of land. Waterbody:Any stream,creek,drainage channel,river,lake, Riparian: Relating to or located on the bank of a natural or similar feature which contains water for most of the year. watercourse,such as a lake,river,or tidewater. Wetland: Lands where the soil is at least periodically satu- Rookery: The breeding ground of certain birds and animals. rated or covered with water. • 71