HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-400608NE 114 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.
0
0
6
W
LU
z T)TACT,p "-,
SENSITIVE AREA
0 409 S.F.
U
z
Q /- 7
m / /
00ENO
STA 22+89.56, GUARDRAIL
RT
L / / 23
INSTALL TYPE 11 BARRICADE ANDS
GUARDRAIL AT TOP OF STEEP SLOPE
BEHIND CURB' TO PROVIDE SAFETY
/
START GUARDRAIL
STA STA 22+89.56, 13.50' L T
r�
Call 2 Working Days Before You Dig
811
Utilities Underground Location Center
(ID,MT,ND,OR,WA)
WF ___—
�42
BE7MMYCORNER
1.0 429.
0.0 428.0
428.0
-D
-----_-- ---- — — — 4W Df
424 — — — — — i-L
---426-------
-
1 I
I
I
I
------7
I I
,--------,
I
1
1
I 1
C 1
I
1
1
14
1 1
1 1
I I
1 1
1 1 I
I I
1 1
-1 6,734 S.F.
1
1 5,948 S. F.
1 1 5, 948 S. F.
1 1 2 I
FG 426.85
1 FG 426.15
I I FG 425.85
5,948 S.F.
1 I
1
1
I I
FG 426.20
L CA TE NO PARKING
1 NO PARKING - FIRE 1-
S/GNS ON LIGHT
1 1 LANE" SIGN TYPE
POLES AS SHOWN
N I R7-1 MUTCDI
I
I
I I (TYP)
■
1' ASPHAL T 41
PA VING
N
I
6
I 6,447 S.F.
FG 426.90
1 lI(STALLED AT 50 0. C.
LL ON NORTH SIDE1
L — — — — — — J L _ B — J1 STANDARD DETAIL 129,1
OF HAMMER -HEAD SEE SHEET-£9-(�YP)
STA 22+45.37 - - —
22+ 00
8' PLANTER
STRIA
I ---I
I 1
J I
I I
I I
1 7 1
1 5,889 S. F. I
FG 426.30 I
I I 1 1
I I I 1
I I I I
I I I I
I I 1
— -----j L — — — — — — J
L 426
C�/GJ/GC/G/
� I
I I I 5' SIDEWALK 1
-1 PER STD PLAN 102 1 'NO PARKING - FIRE I (TYP.) I
1 LANE" SIGN. I I 1
INSTALLED BOTH
---- � — --
I I
I
1 I�
1 I�
I 1
1 1 1
1 7,119 S. F. 1
1 FG 426.75
I
1 II
I
1 I�
L------J
DEAD END
ROAD SIGN
SEE RIGHT
I I
I
I
I
O
o -
L
I
i I
v I
A
I IQI
Io
I I to
I,
1z
-41
1�1
R� I
I II I o� I
I I
I I ,
of I
�I �
I I W i
I I� STA. 2 +00.00 SE 165TH ST =
" I A. 1 +45.27 (111TH AVE SE)
N 20 00 19+80
-� II I
h I
1 DES TURN-AROUN i
i
I I
1 I
I
----------
I TRACT A----------[_
I
a I I
8
1
1
I
II
6,148 S. F. 1
1 6,14� S.F.
I STORM DRAINAGE_______ _
I
® I a I
1 FG 425.80 I
1 FG 425.80
8, 036 S*E _ _ _ _ _C
I I
I
I
I I
: FG 42700 -- -----I
I
I\
1-=,--------=I.------------
-
I I I
IQ I -------------------------
_____
1 N
I
I
�I
— — — — — — L
I
I ------------------- -
------------ ---
e I 1
d° I
D.R. STRONG
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
620 - Ah AVENUE KIRKLAND, WA 98033
O 425 827 3063 F 425 827 2423
— — — — — — I
------- -- -
I1
I!
%N
12"GONG=420.52 �
■i
OP
I
12"CONC=419.80I "
1
I II
12"CONC=419.09' o
. $R
I
■ III
II II �
II I
V�,i -�
rr
AND 2 FIXED BOLLARDS; PER
STANDARD DETAILS H021
AND H022, SEE SHEET C9 (TYP)
FOUND 4"X4" CONCRETE
MONUMENT WITH LEAD
AND TACK, DOWN 0.5'
CD IN MONUMENT CASE.
I I
I
I
I
PROVIDE SMOOTH
TRANSITION FROM EX I
DRIVEWAYS TO NEW
ASPHAL T (TYP) I o
I �—
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
0 1
I
I
I 1 I I
E I
C11 I
� I o
1 � I
ABANDON CULVERTS,
FILL DITCHES AND
ROUTE DRAINAGE TO
FLOWLINE CBS 1
1
V /.60
4' WIDE OFFSITE
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY I �C' A\\
I
I I
SEE LEFT
AS -BUILT
NO AS -BOIL T INFORMA 77ON ON THIS SHEET.
"I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WHICH WAS
AS -BOIL T BY D.R. STRONG, AND MA Y INCLUDE LOCA ]TONS, ELEVA TIONS,
DEPTHS, PIPE SIZES, AND AS-BUIL T COMMENTS, ACCURATEL Y REFLECTS
EXISTING FIELD COND177ONS AS DETERMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION ON THIS DATE ° 051181202 1. "
7 CITY COMMENTS JSM 4.12.19 SURVEYED: SCALE:
SPF VERTICAL: NAVD 1988
8 REVISED FRONTAGE GRADING PER GAS MAIN JSM 12.14.20 DESIGNED: AS NOTED HORIZONTAL: NAD 1983/1991
9 REVISED FRONTAGE PER CITY COMMENTS JSM 1.15.21 JSM
10 REVISED VAULT CONTROL STRUCTURE JSM 5.9.21 DRAWN:
CWA ONE IN DATUM
11 RECORD DRAWINGS JSM 6.25.21 CHECKE JSM
AT FULL SCALE
IF NOT ONE INCH
NO. REVISION BY DATE AP P R APPROVED: SCALE ACCORDINGLY
M J
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 INCH = 30 FT.
C TY OF
=� RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Dept.
BETHAN Y CORNER
S/ TE VOLUME CAL COLA TONS
CUT VOLUME FILL VOLUME NET VOLUME
(CU. YDS.) (CU. YDS.) (CU. YOS.)
12 9,592 9,480 IMPOR T
ALL VOLUMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND REPRESENT EXCA VA TION FOR
RESIDENCE AS PROPOSED.
THE VOLUMES DO NOT INCLUDE EXPANSION FACTOR OR ANY SOIL TYPE
RESTRICTIONS. THE VOLUMES DO NOT INCLUDE STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION
FOR BUILDINGS.
GEO TECH RECOMMENDATIONS.•
EXCERPTS FROM GEO TECH REPORT PREPARED BY ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES,
INC, DATED DEC 16, 2016
"OUR EXPLORATIONS INDICATE THAT, FROM A GEOTECHNICAL STANDPOINT, THE
PROPOSED PROJECT IS FEASIBLE PROVIDED THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED
HEREIN ARE PROPERLY FOLLOWED. THE BEARING STRATUM IS GENERALLY SHALLOW
ON THE EAST END AND CONVENTIONAL SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS SHOULD PERFORM
WELL WITH PROPER SUBGRADE PREPARATION. THE WEST END OF THE SITE WILL
REQUIRE THAT THE UNSUITABLE FILL BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF ABOUT 6 FEET
PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL FILL OR TO THE WEST. THE
NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE GRADUALLY SLOPES UP TO THE ADJACENT LOT. THE
TOTAL TOPOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCE ON THE SITE IS ABOUT 6 TO 8 FEET"
SITE PREPARATION
"SITE PREPARATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA SHOULD INCLUDE REMOVAL OF
ALL PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL, GRASS, BRUSH, DEBRIS, AND ANY OTHER
DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. EROSION AND SURFACE WATER CONTROL SHOULD BE
ESTABLISHED AROUND THE CLEARING LIMITS TO SATISFY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.
WE RECOMMEND EXISTING FILL, BE REMOVED FROM BELOW AREAS OF SHALLOW
FOUNDATIONS. WHEN STRUCTURAL FILL IS REQUIRED FOR RESTORATION OF THE
PLANNED FOUNDATION GRADE, OUR RECOMMENDATIONS DETAILED IN THE
"STRUCTURAL FILL" SECTION SHOULD BE FOLLOWED. REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOIL
SHOULD EXTEND LATERALLY BEYOND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT BY A DISTANCE
EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF OVEREXCAVATION. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN EXISTING FILL IS
REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF 2 FEET BELOW A PLANNED FOOTING AREA, THE
EXCAVATION SHOULD ALSO EXTEND LATERALLY 2 FEET BEYOND THE BUILDING
FOOTPRINT IN THAT AREA. WHERE EXISTING FILL IS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH
STRUCTURAL FILL, CONVENTIONAL SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS MAY BE
USED FOR STRUCTURE SUPPORT. THE REQUIRED DEPTH OF REMOVAL SHOULD BE
DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BASED ON ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING
EXCA VA TION.
-SITE PAVING OR UNDER BUILDING SLABS -ON -GRADE, THE BELOW PLANNED ON
STRIPPED SUBGRADE SHOULD BE PROOF -ROLLED WITH HEAVY, RUBBER -TIRED
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS A FULLY LOADED TANDEM -AXLE DUMP TRUCK.
PROOF -ROLLING SHOULD BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL FILL PLACEMENT.
THE PROOF -ROLL SHOULD BE MONITORED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SO
THAT ANY SOFT OR YIELDING SUBGRADE SOILS CAN BE IDENTIFIED, ANY SOFT OR
LOOSE, YIELDING SOILS SHOULD BE REMOVED TO A STABLE SUBGRADE,
PROOF -ROLLING SHOULD ONLY BE ATTEMPTED IF SOIL MOISTURE CONTENTS ARE
AT OR NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. PROOF -ROLLING OF WET SUBGRADES
COULD RESULT IN FURTHER DEGRADATION."
STRUCTURAL FILL
"THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD NOTE THAT ANY PROPOSED FILL SOILS MUST BE
EVALUATED BY ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. (AESI) PRIOR TO THEIR USE IN
FILLS. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THAT WE HAVE A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL 72
HOURS IN ADVANCE TO PERFORM A PROCTOR TEST AND DETERMINE ITS FIELD
COMPACTION STANDARD. SOILS IN WHICH THE AMOUNT OF FINE-GRAINED MATERIAL
(SMALLER THAN THE NO. 200 SIEVE) IS GREATER THAN APPROXIMA TEL Y 5
PERCENT (MEASURED ON THE MINUS NO. 4 SIEVE SIZE) SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
MOISTURE -SENSITIVE. USE OF MOISTURE -SENSITIVE SOIL IN STRUCTURAL FILLS
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO FAVORABLE DRY WEATHER CONDITIONS, AND IS ONLY
PERMITTED IF SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED BY PROJECT PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS. THE NATIVE SOILS PRESENT ONSITE CONTAINED SIGNIFICANT
AMOUNTS OF SILT AND ARE CONSIDERED HIGHLY MOISTURE -SENSITIVE IF FILL IS
PLACED DURING WET WEATHER OR /F PROPER COMPACTION CANNOT BE OBTAINED,
A SELECT IMPORT MATERIAL CONSISTING OFA CLEAN, FREE -DRAINING GRAVEL
AND/OR SAND SHOULD BE USED. FREE -DRAINING FILL CONSISTS OF NON -ORGANIC
SOIL WITH THE AMOUNT OF FINE-GRAINED MATERIAL LIMITED TO 5 PERCENT BY
WEIGHT WHEN MEASURED ON THE MINUS NO SIEVE FRACTION WITH AT LEAST 25
PERCENT RETAINED ON THE NO. 4 SIEVE.
A REPRESENTATIVE FROM OUR FIRM SHOULD INSPECT THE STRIPPED SUBGRADE
AND BE PRESENT DURING PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL TO OBSERVE THE WORK
AND PERFORM A REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER OF IN -PLACE DENSITY TESTS. IN THIS
WAY, THE ADEQUACY OF THE EARTHWORK MAYBE EVALUATED AS FILLING
PROGRESSES, AND ANY PROBLEM AREAS MAY BE CORRECTED AT THAT TIME. IT IS
IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT TAKING
RANDOM COMPACTION TESTS ON A PART-TIME BASIS WILL NOT ASSURE
UNIFORMITY OR ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE OF A FILL. AS SUCH, WE ARE
AVAILABLE TO AID THE OWNER IN DEVELOPING A SUITABLE MONITORING AND
TESTING PROGRAM."
DRAINAGE
'FOUNDATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH FOUNDATION DRAINS. DRAINS SHOULD
CONSIST OF RIGID, PERFORATED, POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE SURROUNDED BY
WASHED PEA GRAVEL. THE DRAINS SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SUFFICIENT
GRADIENT TO ALLOW GRAVITY DISCHARGE AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDING.
ROOF AND SURFACE RUNOFF SHOULD NOT DISCHARGE INTO THE FOOTING DRAIN
SYSTEM, BUT SHOULD BE HANDLED BY A SEPARATE, RIGID, TIGHTLINE DRAIN. IN
PLANNING, EXTERIOR GRADES ADJACENT TO WALLS SHOULD BE SLOPED DOWNWARD
AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO ACHIEVE SURFACE DRAINAGE. "
R -400608
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS
N
N
C)
T
00
Ln
O
O
i
Q
J
W
z
0
DATE:
BETHANY CORNER 11.29.16 >-
FIELDBOOK: z
ROAD AND GRADING PLAN PAGE:
DRAWING N0:
16433 & 16451 111 TH AVENUE SE cs
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98056 SHEET: 8 OF: Ito
r'MW'
W
DRS PROJECT NO. 16062