Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda Packet CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, October 19, 2020 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councilmembers are attending this meeting remotely through Zoom. Public testimony during public hearings and audience comments will be accommodated through Zoom, but the public is requested to sign up for such testimony by emailing cityclerk@rentonwa.govor jmedzegian@rentonwa.gov. For those wishing to attend by Zoom, please (1) click this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87006639675 (or copy the URL and paste into a web browser) or (2) call-in to the Zoom meeting by dialing 253-215-8782 and entering 870 0663 9675, or (3) email one of the above email addresses or call 425-430-6501 by 10 a.m. on the day of the meeting to request an invite with a link to the meeting. Those testifying or providing audience comment will be limited to 5 minutes each speaker unless an exception is granted by the Council. Attendees will be muted and not audible to the Council except during times they are designated to speak. Advance instructions for how to address the Council will be provided to those who sign up in advance to speak and again during the meeting. The proceedings will also be available to view live on Renton’s Channel 21, and streaming live at http://rentonwa.gov/streaming 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS a) King County COVID-19 Update - King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn b) Age-friendly City Designation - AARP Representative Doug Shadel 4. PUBLIC HEARING a) Street Vacation Petition, 1300 Bronson Way North (VAC-20-001) b) 2021 CDBG Allocations 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of October 12, 2020. Council Concur b) AB - 2730 City Clerk reports the bid results from the September 15, 2020 bid opening, and submits the staff recommendation to award the Downtown Streetscape Phase I project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, RW Scott Construction, in the amount of $839,369.50. Council Concur c) AB - 2736 Community & Economic Development Department recommends approval and ratification of Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, extending the agreement to October 8, 2020; and approval and ratification of Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, modifying the agreement and extending the standstill period to March 2021. Council Concur d) AB - 2718 Human Resources / Risk Management Department recommends approval of the 2021 Healthcare Management Administrators Fee Schedule, in an amount of approximately $359,640, for medical and dental claims administration for active employees and LEOFF I retirees. Refer to Finance Committee 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Utilities Committee: Burnett & Williams Water Quality Project; Utility Revenue & CIP, Puget Sound Energy Easement 9. LEGISLATION Ordinance for first reading: a) Ordinance No. 5984: Code Cleanup (D-172 - Docket 14, Group E) (Approved by 6/8/2020 P & D Committee) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 4:00 p.m. - MEETING REMOTELY Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings STATE OF KING COUNTYRenton City CouncilCouncilmember Reagan DunnDistrict 9October 19, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) UPDATE ON COVID -19 PANDEMIC AND RESPONSE Councilmember Reagan DunnAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan Dunn1918 FLU PANDEMICSource: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/03/how-cities-flattened-curve-1918-spanish-flu-pandemic-coronavirus/#closeAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnKING COUNTY COVID-19 CASESAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnSTATEWIDE UNEMPLOYMENT SURGEAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnLEGISLATION •Project CARE (2020-0131) (approved 3/24) : www.KingCounty.gov/CARE•Payment plans for property tax bills (Motion 2020-0192) (approved 6/23) https://kingcounty.gov/depts/finance-business-operations/treasury/property-tax/payment-plans.aspx•County-wide Pandemic Response Plans (Motion 2020-0183)(approved 6/23)•UW report on the effectiveness of the County’s COVID-19 response (Motion 2020-0182) (to be voted on 9/29) •Hiring freeze on King County personnel (Ordinance 2020-0181)•Task force to plan for economic recovery (Motion 2020-0166) (Joint Executive and Council leadership initiative in progress)•Reinforce video conferencing privacy laws for remote addiction recovery meetings (Ordinance 2020-0201) (Heard in Law and Justice; second briefing in Law and Justice in December)•Allow restaurants and retail services in the unincorporated areas to provide additional or new outdoor dining or retail opportunities (Motion 2020-0208) (Approved 6/23)AGENDA ITEM #3. a) KING COUNTY BUDGETCouncilmember Reagan DunnAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan Dunn2021-2022 BIENNIUM BUDGET FORECAST•Estimated $100 million decrease to the General Fund•Taxable sales show slow growth, which will continue to impact various sales tax based funds:•MIDD –$10 million decrease•Metro –$84 million decrease (sales tax only)•Lodging Tax –$12 million decrease•Rental Car –$1.2 million decrease•REET –no change•Assessed value for the county remains flat and for UKC an average growth of 1.5%.•Given this, county revenues related to property taxes (e.g. General Fund, VSHSL, Best Starts for Kids, Parks Levy, EMS, etc.) will increase between 0-2% on average.AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan Dunn2021-2022 BIENNIUM BUDGETISSUES TO WATCH•The Executive transmitted his proposed budget to the Council in late September. Proposals include:•Asking the Council to spend $4.2 million of our Rainy Day Fund to purchase hotel rooms for people experiencing homelessness during the pandemic. •Asking the Council to increase the sales tax by 0.1% to fund $400 million for permanent housing for the chronically homeless.•Proposing cutting the King County Sheriff’s Office budget by $6.2 million, which would reduce the number of deputies that serve unincorporated King County and our contract cities, including CovingtonAGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnPROPOSED 0.1% SALES TAX•The King County Executive has proposed a countywide 0.1% sales tax increase to fund permanent housing for the chronically homeless•Suburban cities are effectively opting out of this proposal by enacting their own 0.1% sales tax increase to fund affordable housing within their own jurisdiction.•Cities that have acted to enact their own sales tax increase are:•Bellevue•Covington•Issaquah•Kent•Maple Valley•North Bend•Renton•Snoqualmie•City of Tukwila rejected a local sales tax increase, and the City of Federal Way decided to take no action.AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnFALL 2020 BUDGET SCHEDULE•Committee Stand-Down –Only Full Council, Committee of the Whole, regional committees, and Flood Control District are meeting until December. •Budget Schedule•Flood Control District Budget – Executive Committee will hear the Chair’s striking amendment on the Wednesday, October 7, and final passage is expected on November 4, 2020.•2021-22 Biennial Budget –Scheduled for final passage by November 24, 2020.•5th COVID-19 Supplemental Budget –Executive expects to transmit on or around October 15 to spend the roughly $70 million in CARES Act funds left.AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Councilmember Reagan DunnQUESTIONS?Opportunity to make requests for 2021-2022 biennial budget & 5thCOVID-19 emergency supplemental budget (CARES Act funding)AGENDA ITEM #3. a) VACATION PETITION –VAC -20-001 1300 BRONSON WAY N Public Hearing October 19, 2020 Amanda Askren, PLS aaskren@rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #4. a) LOCATION AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BACKGROUND •Petition received July 21, 2020 and verified September 1, 2020. •Pursuant to State and City Code, more than 2/3 of the abutting owners must sign the petition –100% for this petition. •The vacation petition is to vacate 1-foot of alleyway that was dedicated on the original plat from 1907. •This petition is in conjunction with proposed and active land development for CITC, which the Petitioner and City have been processing.AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BACKGROUND •During the Land Use process, the building was surveyed and shown to be located 1-foot into the existing alleyway boundary lines. •The vacation will vacate that 1-foot strip where the building encroaches onto the west side of the alleyway, while the City is requiring a 1-foot dedication on the east side of the alleyway to maintain the full 16-feet alley width to meet City Code.AGENDA ITEM #4. a) VACATION LOCATION AGENDA ITEM #4. a) STAFF REVIEW •Vacation request was circulated to various City departments and outside agencies for comments. •No objections were raised on the vacation. •There are City utilities within the existing alleyway, however they are not affected by this 1-foot vacation.AGENDA ITEM #4. a) STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community and Economic Development Department recommends that Council approve the request to vacate subject to the following conditions: •Dedication of 1-foot on east side to maintain 16- feet of alleyway •Petitioner provide an appraisal of the 1-foot vacation.AGENDA ITEM #4. a) NEXT STEPS •Hear public testimony tonight. •After the close of the public hearing, Council can either approve with conditions or deny the vacation petition. •If the Council decides to approve or approve with conditions the petition, the petitioner will be required to submit an appraisal. •Once the appraisal has been reviewed, staff will return to Council with recommendation for compensation and Council will set the amount.AGENDA ITEM #4. a) COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS •City staff –Amanda Askren, PLS email -aaskren@rentonwa.gov phone -425.430.7369 AGENDA ITEM #4. a) 2021 Community Development Block Grant Funds Allocation & Use Briefing and Public Hearing October 19, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Allocation & Use Summary For 2021, utilize $713,229 in new CDBG funds for King County contractual set-asides, City planning and administration, and City public facility and improvement activities.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) CDBG Background •City of Renton receives an annual allotment of CDBG funds via an agreement with King County. –CDBG is a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. –Program utilizes federal funding that is administered through the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). •Beginning in 2015, City allocated discretionary CDBG funds to be used for economic development and related activities. •2021 allotment is estimated to be $713,229.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) CDBG 2021 Funding Plan YEAR ACTIVITY NATIONAL OBJECTIVE AMOUNT 2021 King County Contractual Set-asides - General Administration - Capital Administration - Housing Stability Program - Housing Repair Program Subtotal Not Applicable $71,323 $14,265 $35,661 $178,307 $ 299,566 City Planning and Administration Not Applicable $ 71,323 Public Facilities and Improvements Program (“Public Improvements Program”) Low- and Moderate-Income Area Benefit $ 342,350 2021 TOTAL $713,229 AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Public Facilities and Improvements Program •Purpose –Improve accessibility and safety for pedestrians in areas where improvements are made; –Replace deteriorated or substandard streetscapes in selected areas of the combined Downtown and South Renton subareas of the City Center community and the Sunset area; and –Serve as an economic development catalyst to continue existing and encourage additional private development projects within the City’s two revitalization areas.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Public Facilities and Improvements Program •Potential Projects and Opportunity Locations: –Continue to augment improvements already planned in Downtown’s one way conversion projects along Williams and Main avenues –The Downtown Streetscape Improvements can assist with improvements that will bring the public realm of the blocks in between the intersections up to current code and accessibility standards. –Improve pedestrian amenities and safety by providing sidewalk and associated infrastructure improvements. •2021 CDBG funding is not sufficient to fund all of the opportunities listed above. •Program intends to be a multi-year phased project.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) 2021 Funding Contingency Plan King County requires a Funding Contingency Plan if HUD’s allocation is greater or less than the 2021 estimated amounts: •Any increases in entitlement funds will go to the Downtown Streetscape Improvements after funding planning and administration to the maximum allowable amount. •Any decrease in entitlement will decrease the amount to the Downtown Streetscape Improvements. •Any 2021 Public Improvements Program funds not under contract by December 31, 2021 will be recaptured and reallocated to the Healthy Housing program •Any program income will be allocated to the Healthy Housing Program.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Recommendation •Council holds Public Hearing on October 19, 2020 (per public notice) to provide opportunity for public comment on the recommended allocation and use plan. •Following public hearing and consideration of public comment, Council is requested to concur with staff recommendation and proposed changes (if any) based upon any Council discussion.AGENDA ITEM #4. b) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF RENTON MINUTES - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, October 12, 2020 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pavone called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Ruth Pérez, Council President Angelina Benedetti, Council Position No. 2 Valerie O'Halloran, Council Position No. 3 Ryan McIrvin, Council Position No. 4 Ed Prince, Council Position No. 5 Kim-Khánh Vǎn, Council Position No. 7 (all councilmembers attended remotely) Councilmembers Absent: Randy Corman, Council Position No. 1 MOVED BY PÉREZ, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT Armondo Pavone, Mayor Leslie Clark, Senior Assistant City Attorney Jason Seth, City Clerk Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Kristi Rowland, Organizational Development Manager Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator Chip Vincent, Community & Economic Development Administrator Martin Pastucha, Public Works Administrator Ellen Bradley-Mak, Human Resources and Risk Management Administrator Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director Ron Straka, Utilities Systems Director Deb Needham, Emergency Management Director AGENDA ITEM #7. a) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Chief Ed VanValey, Police Department Administrator Commander Tracy Wilkinson, Police Department (All City Staff attended remotely except City Clerk Jason Seth) PROCLAMATION a) Indigenous Peoples' Day: A proclamation by Mayor Pavone was read declaring October 12, 2020 to be Indigenous Peoples' Day in the City of Renton, encouraging all members of the community to join in this special observation. Matt Remle accepted the proclamation with appreciation. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. b) Affordable Housing Week: A proclamation by Mayor Pavone was read declaring October 12 - 16, 2020 to be Affordable Housing Week in the City of Renton, encouraging all members of the community to join in this special observation. Councilmember Ryan McIrvin accepted the proclamation with appreciation. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT City Clerk Jason Seth reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City’s recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2020 and beyond. Items noted were:  Construction for the Coulon Playground Replacement will begin on October 26th. The project includes removing and replacing the existing playground and exercise equipment and evaluating the drainage. The project is funded by the taxpayers of Washington State through a State Direct Legislative Appropriation and Renton Regional Community Foundation Charles L. Custer Renton Park Memorial Fund. The new playground, with equipment chosen based on a community survey, is expected to open in early 2021.  Renton Outdoors is an ongoing program of guided hikes offered at different parks. On Saturday, October 17, plant species identification walks will take place at Coulon Park. Due to COVID-19 protocols, groups are limited to five at a time and participants must register using the Course & Event Registration icon on the Recreation & Neighborhoods Division webpage. For the same self-guided hike, the Plant Species Identification Walk brochure is available to download from the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park webpage. Check the City’s Event Calendar for future hike topics and locations, or contact Community Services at 425-430-6600.  The Public Works Department would like to remind residents to help us prevent local residential street flooding by monitoring catch basins near your home and keeping them clear of leaves and other debris. Street sweepers are dispatched daily to clean up debris along major arterials.  Preventative street maintenance will continue to impact traffic and result in occasional street closures. AGENDA ITEM #7. a) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the Consent Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of October 5, 2020. Council Concur. b) AB - 2734 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Real Estate Disposition and Development Agreement, with Cosmos International Corp., extending the agreement until October 18, 2021 in order to accommodate the effects of Covid-19, the issuance of a new Library LBA, and required modifications to the definition of LBA Approval as intended in Milestone 4 under Section 6.3 of the agreement. Council Concur. c) AB - 2700 Community Services Department recommended approval of an easement within Riverview Park from Puget Sound Energy in order to accommodate their Energize Eastside project. Puget Sound Energy will pay $2,000 in compensation for the easement to the City. Refer to Utilities Committee. d) AB - 2729 Community Services Department recommended adoption of the Human Service Advisory Committee's recommendation for funding human services programs in the amount of $562,036 for 2021-2022. Refer to Finance Committee. e) AB - 2725 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the proposed 2021-2022 utility rates and fees, and requested authorization to draft legislation to implement the changes. Refer to Utilities Committee. f) AB - 2726 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with BHC Consultants, LLC, in the amount of $493,533, to provide consulting services for the Burnett Ave S and Williams Ave S Water Quality Retrofit project. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY PÉREZ, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation to adopt 2020 Title IV Docket Group #15, Group B. The Planning and Development Committee further recommended that ordinances for the items listed below be prepared and presented for first reading when they are complete. • #D-176: Self-Service Storage in Commercial Zones • #D-177: Daycare Fees • #D-178: Standalone Solar Structures • #D-179: CD Zone Changes • #D-180: Vesting Regulations • #D-181: ADU Amendments • #D-182: SEPA Appeal Process • #D-183: Other Government Uses MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. AGENDA ITEM #7. a) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES b) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation to adopt amendments as outlined by D-173, Waived Fees. Additionally, the Planning and Development Committee recommended establishing a cap of 100 dwelling units on the total number of dwelling units eligible to benefit from waived fees. The Planning and Development Committee further recommended that an ordinance for D- 173 be prepared and presented for first reading when complete. This Committee Report shall supersede the Committee Report on D-173 signed on August 10, 2020. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. c) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation to amend the Comprehensive Plan with its associated map and text amendments. The Planning and Development Committee further recommended that ordinances for the following items be prepared and presented for first reading when they are complete. • CPA #19-M-01: 900 Lind Ave • CPA #19-M-02: Zoning and Land Use Reconciliation • CPA #19-M-03: Benson, Upland Group Additionally, CPA #19-M-04: N 30th Street will be held and processed during next year’s Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle to allow time for further review and additional public engagement. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. d) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the resolution adopting the 2020-2021 South King Housing and Homeless Partners (SKHHP) Work Plan. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. e) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the resolution adopting the 2021 South King Housing and Homeless Partners (SKHHP) Budget. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. f) Planning & Development Committee Vice Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and to incorporate the requested fee amounts for each District (shown below) into the Renton Fee Schedule. Renton 2020 Single-Family $7,681 Multi-Family $4,989 Kent 2019 Single-Family $5,692.85 Multi-Family $2,404.63 AGENDA ITEM #7. a) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Issaquah 2019 Single-Family $18,213 Multi-Family $12,043 Additionally, the Committee recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for adoption. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. g) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the following payments: 1. Accounts Payable – total payment of $11,546,217.95 for vouchers, 6382-6393, 115878, and 386820-387001, 387012-387297, 387299-387579; payroll benefit withholding vouchers 6382-6393 and 387002-387011 and four wire transfers. 2. Payroll – total payment of $1,466,671.03 for payroll vouchers that include 568 direct deposits. (09/01/20-09/15/20 pay period). 3. Kidder Mathews vouchers 6188-6199 totaling $39,438.48. MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. h) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve two grant agreements for $5,000 each ($10,000 total) with King County's Youth & Amateur Sports Grants Program, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney Department, and allocate grant funds to Recreation & Neighborhoods Division. MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. LEGISLATION Resolutions: a) Resolution No. 4416: A resolution was read adopting by reference the current Capital Facilities Plans for Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts, and adopting updated school impact fees for each school district. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. b) Resolution No. 4420: A resolution was read adopting the 2020-2021 South King Housing and Homelessness Work Plan. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. c) Resolution No. 4421: A resolution was read adopting the 2021 South King Housing and Homelessness budget. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Ordinance for second and final reading: AGENDA ITEM #7. a) October 12, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES d) Ordinance No. 5981: An ordinance was read providing for relief from code standards by amending Subsections 4-2-110.A, 4-2-110.E.2, 4-2-120.A, 4-2-120.B, 4-2-120.C, 4-3-100.E.b, 4- 4-095.I, 4-8-070.D.8, 4-9-250.B, 4-9-250.C, and 4-9-250.D of the Renton Municipal Code; repealing Subsections 4-3-100.F, 4-3-100.G, 4-4-130.H and 4-4-130.I of the Renton Municipal Code; re-lettering Subsection 4-3-100.I of the Renton Municipal Code to 4-3-100.F; and adding 4-4-010.Q to Section 4-4-010 of the Renton Municipal Code; providing for severability, and establishing an effective date. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY O'HALLORAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. TIME: 7:30 P.M. Jason A. Seth, MMC, City Clerk Jason Seth, Recorder 12 Oct 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar October 12, 2020 October 19, 2020 Monday 2:00 PM Utilities Committee, Chair O’Halloran - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. Utilities Revenue and CIP 2. Burnett and Williams Water Quality Project 3. Puget Sound Energy Easement CANCELED Transportation Committee, Chair McIrvin *CANCELED Public Safety Committee, Chair Benedetti *3:15 PM Executive Session – VIDEOCONFERENCE – For approx. 30 minutes 1. Potential Litigation – Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) 4:00 PM Committee of the Whole, Chair Pérez 1. Budget – Department Presentations and Council Deliberations 7:00 PM City Council Meeting, Chair Pérez – VIDEOCONFERENCE *Meeting added/canceled Updated 10/13/20 AGENDA ITEM #7. a) AB - 2730 City Council Regular Meeting - 19 Oct 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Contract Award: Downtown Core Streetscape Phase I project; CAG - 20-143 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: City Clerk STAFF CONTACT: Jason Seth, City Clerk EXT.: 6502 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Bid Amount: $838,369.50 Total Budget: $1,059,710.00 (includes $336,855 from CDBG funds) Engineer's Estimate: $1,086,812.00 SUMMARY OF ACTION: City Clerk reports bid opening on September 15, 2020 for the Downtown Core Streetscape Phase I project, and submits the staff recommendation to award the contract to RW Scott Construction, in the amount of $839,369.50. The bid opening met the following Council criteria: 1) There was more than one bid; 2) The lowest responsive and responsible bid was within the total project budget; and 3) The lowest responsive and responsible bid had no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends awarding the Downtown Streetscape Phase I project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, RW Scott Construction, in the amount of $839,369.50. EXHIBITS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Bid Tab STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the Downtown Streetscape Phase I project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, RW Scott Construction, in the amount of $839,369.50. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:September 23, 2020 TO:Jason Seth, City Clerk FROM:David Buchheit, Downtown Manager, x7270 SUBJECT:Bid Opening and Recommendation for Award of Contract for Downtown Core Streetscape Phase 1 CAG-20-143 The Community and Economic Development Department has reviewed the bids submitted for the Downtown Core Streetscape Phase 1 project and recommends that the contract CAG-20- 143 be awarded to RW Scott Construction in the amount of $839,369.50. We request that an agenda bill for Council Concur be prepared for the October 19, 2020 Council Meeting. The bid opening was held on September 15, 2020. Thirteen bids were received. The low bid was submitted by RW Scott Construction, in the total amount of $839,369.50 with any applicable sales tax. We have checked the bids for mathematical errors and found a few mathematical errors, but they did not affect the low bid. A tabulation of the bids is attached. We have verified that RW Scott Construction is the lowest responsible bidder and that they have submitted a responsive bid. We have also evaluated the supplemental bidder responsibility and pre-award questionnaire and determined that RW Scott Construction has the required experience and qualifications to perform the work. We recommend that the contract CAG-20-143 be awarded to the low bidder RW Scott Construction in the total amount of $839,369.50. The engineer’s estimate is $1,086,812.00. The budget amount for this construction contract is $722,855 and the 2020 amount of 336,855 will be added to the Community Development Block Grant budget for the Downtown Core Streetscape Phase 1. The project consists of the construction of new sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping and wayfinding elements. Attachments Bid Tabulation cc: Chip Vincent, Administrator Cliff Long, Economic Development Director Dianne Utecht, CDBG Specialist AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Downtown Core Streetscape Phase 1Bid TabulationBid Opening: September 15, 2020No. Spec No. DescriptionQuantity Unit Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total11-04Minor Change1EST5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 21-05Roadway Surveying1LS13,600.00$ 13,600.00$ 15,433.00$ 15,433.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,900.00$ 6,900.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 31-05Record Drawings1LS800.00$ 800.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 41-07SPCC Plan1LS500.00$ 500.00$ 3,690.00$ 3,690.00$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 250.00$ 250.00$ 51-07COVID-19 Health and Safety Plan (CHSP)1LS1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 250.00$ 250.00$ 61-07COVID-19 Added Measures (Without Overhead & Profit)1EST3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 71-09Mobilization1LS74,000.00$ 74,000.00$ 74,200.00$ 74,200.00$ 56,961.00$ 56,961.00$ 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 98,000.00$ 98,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 81-10Project Temporary Traffic Control1LS84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 155,440.00$ 155,440.00$ 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 95,000.00$ 95,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 92-02Removal of Structures and Obstructions1LS8,500.00$ 8,500.00$ 35,433.00$ 35,433.00$ 12,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 41,526.00$ 41,526.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 102-02Asphalt Conc. Pavement Removal400SY18.00$ 7,200.00$ 18.00$ 7,200.00$ 31.00$ 12,400.00$ 30.00$ 12,000.00$ 23.00$ 9,200.00$ 20.00$ 8,000.00$ 14.00$ 5,600.00$ 112-02Cement Conc. Sidewalk Removal890SY15.00$ 13,350.00$ 26.00$ 23,140.00$ 17.50$ 15,575.00$ 9.50$ 8,455.00$ 17.00$ 15,130.00$ 25.00$ 22,250.00$ 16.50$ 14,685.00$ 122-02Curb Removal760LF12.00$ 9,120.00$ 12.00$ 9,120.00$ 7.50$ 5,700.00$ 11.00$ 8,360.00$ 6.65$ 5,054.00$ 15.00$ 11,400.00$ 8.50$ 6,460.00$ 134-04Crushed Surfacing Base Course340TON54.00$ 18,360.00$ 44.00$ 14,960.00$ 58.00$ 19,720.00$ 81.00$ 27,540.00$ 64.00$ 21,760.00$ 100.00$ 34,000.00$ 75.00$ 25,500.00$ 145-04HMA Cl. 1/2" PG 64-22110TON150.00$ 16,500.00$ 325.00$ 35,750.00$ 192.00$ 21,120.00$ 170.00$ 18,700.00$ 180.00$ 19,800.00$ 175.00$ 19,250.00$ 260.00$ 28,600.00$ 157-01Downspout and Roof Drains1LS5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 18,766.00$ 18,766.00$ 8,500.00$ 8,500.00$ 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 31,250.00$ 31,250.00$ 167-04Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe 8 In. Diam.40LF160.00$ 6,400.00$ 129.00$ 5,160.00$ 140.00$ 5,600.00$ 180.00$ 7,200.00$ 70.00$ 2,800.00$ 200.00$ 8,000.00$ 112.00$ 4,480.00$ 177-05Shallow Concrete Inlet1EA1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 2,230.00$ 2,230.00$ 1,850.00$ 1,850.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 1,150.00$ 1,150.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 187-05Adjust Cleanout to Grade8EA450.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,344.00$ 10,752.00$ 525.00$ 4,200.00$ 700.00$ 5,600.00$ 122.00$ 976.00$ 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 525.00$ 4,200.00$ 197-05Adjust Storm Drainage Structure to Grade2EA600.00$ 1,200.00$ 860.00$ 1,720.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 700.00$ 1,400.00$ 610.00$ 1,220.00$ 800.00$ 1,600.00$ 525.00$ 1,050.00$ 207-05Adjust Area Drain to Grade2EA450.00$ 900.00$ 550.00$ 1,100.00$ 475.00$ 950.00$ 600.00$ 1,200.00$ 335.00$ 670.00$ 800.00$ 1,600.00$ 525.00$ 1,050.00$ 217-05Connection to Drainage Structure1EA1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,589.00$ 2,589.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,700.00$ 1,700.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 227-05Furnish and Install New Frame and Grate, Adjust to Grade4EA900.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,150.00$ 4,600.00$ 1,350.00$ 5,400.00$ 1,100.00$ 4,400.00$ 800.00$ 3,200.00$ 1,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 800.00$ 3,200.00$ 237-15Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade15EA500.00$ 7,500.00$ 850.00$ 12,750.00$ 475.00$ 7,125.00$ 150.00$ 2,250.00$ 230.00$ 3,450.00$ 500.00$ 7,500.00$ 525.00$ 7,875.00$ 248-01Erosion Control and Water Pollution Prevention1LS5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 26,550.00$ 26,550.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 15,400.00$ 15,400.00$ 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 18,850.00$ 18,850.00$ 258-02Topsoil Type A35CY75.00$ 2,625.00$ 76.00$ 2,660.00$ 84.00$ 2,940.00$ 70.00$ 2,450.00$ 46.00$ 1,610.00$ 200.00$ 7,000.00$ 80.00$ 2,800.00$ 26 8-02PS Nyssa Sylvatica 'David Odom' / Afterburner Tupelo; 2.5" cal., 12'-14' ht.5 EA 600.00$ 3,000.00$ 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 790.00$ 3,950.00$ 625.00$ 3,125.00$ 732.00$ 3,660.00$ 100.00$ 500.00$ 715.00$ 3,575.00$ 27 8-02PS Carpinus caroliniana 'Palisade'/ Palisade American Hornbeam; 2.5" cal., 12'-14' ht. 4 EA 600.00$ 2,400.00$ 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 770.00$ 3,080.00$ 625.00$ 2,500.00$ 732.00$ 2,928.00$ 100.00$ 400.00$ 715.00$ 2,860.00$ 288-02Root Barrier216LF12.00$ 2,592.00$ 45.00$ 9,720.00$ 16.00$ 3,456.00$ 18.50$ 3,996.00$ 14.65$ 3,164.40$ 20.00$ 4,320.00$ 21.00$ 4,536.00$ 298-03Automatic Irrigation System, Complete1LS15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,470.00$ 15,470.00$ 24,000.00$ 24,000.00$ 44,300.00$ 44,300.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 21,500.00$ 21,500.00$ 308-04Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter800LF40.00$ 32,000.00$ 48.00$ 38,400.00$ 36.00$ 28,800.00$ 34.00$ 27,200.00$ 32.20$ 25,760.00$ 30.00$ 24,000.00$ 33.25$ 26,600.00$ 318-06Cement Conc. Driveway Entrance90SY180.00$ 16,200.00$ 78.00$ 7,020.00$ 216.00$ 19,440.00$ 175.00$ 15,750.00$ 200.50$ 18,045.00$ 175.00$ 15,750.00$ 206.00$ 18,540.00$ 328-14Cement Conc. Sidewalk760SY100.00$ 76,000.00$ 61.00$ 46,360.00$ 111.00$ 84,360.00$ 95.00$ 72,200.00$ 180.00$ 136,800.00$ 90.00$ 68,400.00$ 96.00$ 72,960.00$ 338-14Cement Conc. Ramp for Building Entrance1EA2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 3,250.00$ 3,250.00$ 2,375.00$ 2,375.00$ 1,950.00$ 1,950.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 348-19Adjust Franchise Utility Vault to Grade5EA950.00$ 4,750.00$ 850.00$ 4,250.00$ 1,050.00$ 5,250.00$ 1,375.00$ 6,875.00$ 620.00$ 3,100.00$ 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,200.00$ 11,000.00$ 358-19Adjust Gas Valve to Grade2EA450.00$ 900.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,400.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 140.00$ 280.00$ 270.00$ 540.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 525.00$ 1,050.00$ 368-20Illumination System Along Wells Avenue, Complete1LS250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 295,000.00$ 295,000.00$ 292,000.00$ 292,000.00$ 237,000.00$ 237,000.00$ 275,000.00$ 275,000.00$ 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$ 274,000.00$ 274,000.00$ 37 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Pedestrian Kiosk at S 3rd Street & Burnett Avenue S1 LS 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 6,100.00$ 6,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 11,750.00$ 11,750.00$ 11,500.00$ 11,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 4,411.00$ 4,411.00$ 38 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Gateway Monument at S 4th Street & Burnett Avenue S1 LS 33,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 41,200.00$ 41,200.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 27,750.00$ 27,750.00$ 39 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Gateway Monument at S 3rd Street & Rainier Avenue S1 LS 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,500.00$ 15,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 8,500.00$ 8,500.00$ 6,750.00$ 6,750.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 9,700.00$ 9,700.00$ 408-21Permanent Signing1LS1,400.00$ 1,400.00$ 12,580.00$ 12,580.00$ 750.00$ 750.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 418-21Pedestrian Directional Foundation and Post1EA5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 7,300.00$ 7,300.00$ 4,100.00$ 4,100.00$ 8,800.00$ 8,800.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 428-26Gateway Monument1LS150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 111,450.00$ 111,450.00$ 76,900.00$ 76,900.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 61,000.00$ 61,000.00$ 438-27Pedestrian Kiosk1LS105,000.00$ 105,000.00$ 99,780.00$ 99,780.00$ 71,250.00$ 71,250.00$ 62,500.00$ 62,500.00$ 63,500.00$ 63,500.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 62,500.00$ 62,500.00$ 448-30Waste Receptacle2EA2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3,570.00$ 7,140.00$ 2,150.00$ 4,300.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,150.00$ 4,300.00$ 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,750.00$ 3,500.00$ 458-31Bench1EA2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 4,599.00$ 4,599.00$ 2,170.00$ 2,170.00$ 2,900.00$ 2,900.00$ 2,100.00$ 2,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 468-32Tree Grate9EA5,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 2,450.00$ 22,050.00$ 3,300.00$ 29,700.00$ 3,900.00$ 35,100.00$ 1,950.00$ 17,550.00$ 3,500.00$ 31,500.00$ 1,725.00$ 15,525.00$ 478-33Resolution of Utility Conflicts1EST5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Total Construction Cost 1,086,797.00$ 1,241,312.00$ 947,947.00$ 1,003,232.00$ 1,063,317.40$ 1,097,870.00$ 1,007,007.00$ *Corrected TotalFor A1 Landscaping & Construction, handwritten total was $1,201,312.00For NPM Construction Co., handwritten total was $1,018,936.00KC Equipment LLCEngineer's Estimate A1 Landscaping & Construction Active Construction Inc Cascade Civil Construction Johansen Construction Co.Northwest Cascade Inc.Page 1 of 2AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Downtown Core Streetscape Phase 1Bid TabulationBid Opening: September 15, 2020No. Spec No. DescriptionQuantity Unit11-04Minor Change1EST21-05Roadway Surveying1LS31-05Record Drawings1LS41-07SPCC Plan1LS51-07COVID-19 Health and Safety Plan (CHSP)1LS61-07COVID-19 Added Measures (Without Overhead & Profit)1EST71-09Mobilization1LS81-10Project Temporary Traffic Control1LS92-02Removal of Structures and Obstructions1LS102-02Asphalt Conc. Pavement Removal400SY112-02Cement Conc. Sidewalk Removal890SY122-02Curb Removal760LF134-04Crushed Surfacing Base Course340TON145-04HMA Cl. 1/2" PG 64-22110TON157-01Downspout and Roof Drains1LS167-04Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe 8 In. Diam.40LF177-05Shallow Concrete Inlet1EA187-05Adjust Cleanout to Grade8EA197-05Adjust Storm Drainage Structure to Grade2EA207-05Adjust Area Drain to Grade2EA217-05Connection to Drainage Structure1EA227-05Furnish and Install New Frame and Grate, Adjust to Grade4EA237-15Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade15EA248-01Erosion Control and Water Pollution Prevention1LS258-02Topsoil Type A35CY26 8-02PS Nyssa Sylvatica 'David Odom' / Afterburner Tupelo; 2.5" cal., 12'-14' ht.5 EA27 8-02PS Carpinus caroliniana 'Palisade'/ Palisade American Hornbeam; 2.5" cal., 12'-14' ht. 4 EA288-02Root Barrier216LF298-03Automatic Irrigation System, Complete1LS308-04Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter800LF318-06Cement Conc. Driveway Entrance90SY328-14Cement Conc. Sidewalk760SY338-14Cement Conc. Ramp for Building Entrance1EA348-19Adjust Franchise Utility Vault to Grade5EA358-19Adjust Gas Valve to Grade2EA368-20Illumination System Along Wells Avenue, Complete1LS37 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Pedestrian Kiosk at S 3rd Street & Burnett Avenue S1 LS38 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Gateway Monument at S 4th Street & Burnett Avenue S1 LS39 8-20Electrical System for Internally Illuminated Gateway Monument at S 3rd Street & Rainier Avenue S1 LS408-21Permanent Signing1LS418-21Pedestrian Directional Foundation and Post1EA428-26Gateway Monument1LS438-27Pedestrian Kiosk1LS448-30Waste Receptacle2EA458-31Bench1EA468-32Tree Grate9EA478-33Resolution of Utility Conflicts1ESTTotal Construction Cost*Corrected TotalFor A1 Landscaping & Construction, handwritten total was $1,201,312.00For NPM Construction Co., handwritten total was $1,018,936.00Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit CostTotal Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 6,650.00$ 6,650.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 800.00$ 800.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 800.00$ 800.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 750.00$ 750.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 127,000.00$ 127,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 81,000.00$ 81,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 113,200.00$ 113,200.00$ 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 67,000.00$ 67,000.00$ 23,650.00$ 23,650.00$ 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,785.00$ 6,785.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 30.00$ 12,000.00$ 37.00$ 14,800.00$ 31.25$ 12,500.00$ 18.00$ 7,200.00$ 17.25$ 6,900.00$ 30.00$ 12,000.00$ 2.00$ 800.00$ 40.00$ 35,600.00$ 27.00$ 24,030.00$ 8.50$ 7,565.00$ 14.50$ 12,905.00$ 15.00$ 13,350.00$ 40.00$ 35,600.00$ 2.00$ 1,780.00$ 20.00$ 15,200.00$ 6.00$ 4,560.00$ 5.50$ 4,180.00$ 6.75$ 5,130.00$ 7.00$ 5,320.00$ 15.00$ 11,400.00$ 2.00$ 1,520.00$ 55.00$ 18,700.00$ 20.00$ 6,800.00$ 59.00$ 20,060.00$ 30.00$ 10,200.00$ 53.75$ 18,275.00$ 48.00$ 16,320.00$ 30.00$ 10,200.00$ 170.00$ 18,700.00$ 198.00$ 21,780.00$ 187.00$ 20,570.00$ 165.00$ 18,150.00$ 165.00$ 18,150.00$ 210.00$ 23,100.00$ 300.00$ 33,000.00$ 6,114.00$ 6,114.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 8,335.00$ 8,335.00$ 5,175.00$ 5,175.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 110.00$ 4,400.00$ 160.00$ 6,400.00$ 116.00$ 4,640.00$ 134.00$ 5,360.00$ 109.00$ 4,360.00$ 70.00$ 2,800.00$ 300.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 2,400.00$ 2,400.00$ 1,127.00$ 1,127.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 300.00$ 2,400.00$ 145.00$ 1,160.00$ 550.00$ 4,400.00$ 400.00$ 3,200.00$ 555.00$ 4,440.00$ 300.00$ 2,400.00$ 400.00$ 3,200.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 250.00$ 500.00$ 605.00$ 1,210.00$ 600.00$ 1,200.00$ 725.00$ 1,450.00$ 300.00$ 600.00$ 800.00$ 1,600.00$ 415.00$ 830.00$ 145.00$ 290.00$ 550.00$ 1,100.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 555.00$ 1,110.00$ 300.00$ 600.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,100.00$ 2,100.00$ 850.00$ 850.00$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 800.00$ 800.00$ 825.00$ 825.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 650.00$ 2,600.00$ 840.00$ 3,360.00$ 900.00$ 3,600.00$ 975.00$ 3,900.00$ 600.00$ 2,400.00$ 1,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 350.00$ 5,250.00$ 310.00$ 4,650.00$ 495.00$ 7,425.00$ 400.00$ 6,000.00$ 555.00$ 8,325.00$ 300.00$ 4,500.00$ 700.00$ 10,500.00$ 18,100.00$ 18,100.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 17,825.00$ 17,825.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 95.00$ 3,325.00$ 85.00$ 2,975.00$ 84.00$ 2,940.00$ 63.00$ 2,205.00$ 58.00$ 2,030.00$ 60.00$ 2,100.00$ 65.00$ 2,275.00$ 725.00$ 3,625.00$ 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 784.00$ 3,920.00$ 525.00$ 2,625.00$ 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 725.00$ 2,900.00$ 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 767.20$ 3,068.80$ 525.00$ 2,100.00$ 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 22.00$ 4,752.00$ 15.00$ 3,240.00$ 16.80$ 3,628.80$ 15.75$ 3,402.00$ 16.00$ 3,456.00$ 17.00$ 3,672.00$ 40.00$ 8,640.00$ 24,110.00$ 24,110.00$ 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 19,040.00$ 19,040.00$ 17,200.00$ 17,200.00$ 18,500.00$ 18,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 35.00$ 28,000.00$ 45.00$ 36,000.00$ 50.00$ 40,000.00$ 28.75$ 23,000.00$ 31.75$ 25,400.00$ 42.00$ 33,600.00$ 40.00$ 32,000.00$ 170.00$ 15,300.00$ 145.00$ 13,050.00$ 146.00$ 13,140.00$ 173.25$ 15,592.50$ 169.00$ 15,210.00$ 225.00$ 20,250.00$ 125.00$ 11,250.00$ 140.00$ 106,400.00$ 190.00$ 144,400.00$ 165.00$ 125,400.00$ 92.00$ 69,920.00$ 84.50$ 64,220.00$ 225.00$ 171,000.00$ 125.00$ 95,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,950.00$ 1,950.00$ 4,950.00$ 4,950.00$ 2,575.00$ 2,575.00$ 2,100.00$ 2,100.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 650.00$ 3,250.00$ 535.00$ 2,675.00$ 400.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,475.00$ 7,375.00$ 600.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,300.00$ 6,500.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 325.00$ 650.00$ 535.00$ 1,070.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 555.00$ 1,110.00$ 450.00$ 900.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 257,000.00$ 257,000.00$ 275,000.00$ 275,000.00$ 302,400.00$ 302,400.00$ 280,050.00$ 280,050.00$ 249,650.00$ 249,650.00$ 290,000.00$ 290,000.00$ 425,000.00$ 425,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 3,510.00$ 3,510.00$ 2,490.00$ 2,490.00$ 11,600.00$ 11,600.00$ 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 34,000.00$ 34,000.00$ 29,000.00$ 29,000.00$ 36,990.00$ 36,990.00$ 23,675.00$ 23,675.00$ 32,700.00$ 32,700.00$ 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 13,770.00$ 13,770.00$ 7,290.00$ 7,290.00$ 9,265.80$ 9,265.80$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,225.00$ 2,225.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,700.00$ 6,700.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 5,450.00$ 5,450.00$ 12,675.00$ 12,675.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 59,000.00$ 59,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 74,415.00$ 74,415.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 86,400.00$ 86,400.00$ 90,000.00$ 90,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 62,000.00$ 62,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 67,830.00$ 67,830.00$ 56,675.00$ 56,675.00$ 64,000.00$ 64,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 2,415.00$ 4,830.00$ 600.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,250.00$ 4,500.00$ 1,750.00$ 3,500.00$ 2,100.00$ 4,200.00$ 1,800.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,900.00$ 2,900.00$ 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 4,050.00$ 4,050.00$ 1,650.00$ 1,650.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 27,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 3,300.00$ 29,700.00$ 1,725.00$ 15,525.00$ 3,200.00$ 28,800.00$ 1,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 4,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,037,636.00$ 908,135.00$ 1,055,854.60$ 839,369.50$ 937,271.80$ 1,167,342.00$ 1,287,765.00$ Rodarte Construction Inc. Westwater ConstructionNPM Construction Co. PGH Excavating Pivetta Brother's Construction RW Scott Construction Road Construction NorthwestPage 2 of 2AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax A-1 Landscaping & Construction, Inc. 20607 SR 9 S.E. 1 Snohomish X X X X X X X X $1,201,312.00 WA 98296 TIME: 12:50 pm Naeem Iqbal Active Construction Inc. (ACI) P.O. Box 430 2 Puyallup X X X X X X X X $947,947.00 WA 98371 TIME: 12:55 pm David Ceccanti Cascade Civil Construction P.O. Box 73457 3 Puyallup X X X X X X X X $1,003,232.00 WA 98373 TIME: 12:45 pm Alan Aplin Bidder FORMS Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax Bidder FORMS Johansen Construction Co. P.O. Box 674 4 Buckley X X X X X X X X $1,063,317.40 WA 98321 TIME: 12:40 pm Jacob Cimmer KC Equipment, LLC 2410 Boyer Avenue E#3 5 Seattle X X X X X X X X $1,097,870.00 WA 98112 TIME: 12:37 pm Brett Franceschina NPM Construction Co. P.O. Box 1229 6 Maple Valley X X X X X X X X $1,018,936.00 WA 98038 TIME: 12:20 pm Nando Merlino Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax Bidder FORMS Northwest Cascade, Inc. P.O. Box 73399 7 Puyallup X X X X X X X X $1,007,07.00 WA 98373 TIME: 12:55 pm Clinton Myers PGH Excavating, Inc. P.O. Box 1151 8 Enumclaw X X X X X X X X $908,135.00 WA 98022 TIME: 12:50 pm Nick Thornhill Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc. P.O.Box 370 9 Sumner X X X X X X X X $1,055,854.00 WA 98390 TIME: 12:27 pm Mark Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax Bidder FORMS Pivetta R.W.Scott Construction Co. 4005 West Valley Highway, Suite A 10 Auburn X X X X X X X X $839,369.50 WA 98001 TIME: 12:50 pm Jeff Scott Road Construction Northwest, Inc. P.O. Box 2228 11 Renton X X X X X X X X $937,271.80 WA 98056 TIME: 12:40 pm Matthew Wagester Rodarte Construction, Inc. 17 East Valley Hwy E 12 Auburn X X X X X X X X $1,167,342.00 WA 98092 TIME: 12:30 pm John Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax Bidder FORMS Ellis Westwater Construction Co. P.O. Box 59237 13 Renton X X X X X X X X $1,287,765.00 WA 98058 TIME: 12:45 pm Thomas Caplis Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Project: Downtown Core Streetscapes Phase 1 Project - CAG-20-143 Due Date: September 15, 2020 - Opening at 3:00 pm (Video Conference) CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Total from Prop Bid Fed Aid Non-Coll Recycled Wage Sub Adden Schedule of Prices Bond Cert Decl Mat Compl List 1 & 2 *Includes Sales Tax Bidder FORMS Engineer's Estimate $1,047,012.00 AGENDA ITEM #7. b) AB - 2736 City Council Regular Meeting - 19 Oct 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Ratification of Two Extensions to DevCo Solera Standstill Agreement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director EXT.: 7314 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: On April 6, 2020, City Council adopted a moratorium that prohibits the acceptance of permit applications for Large Residential Projects (>150 units) in the Sunset Area. A Large Residential Project, named “Solera,” was already entitled for construction prior to adoption of the moratorium, and Solera representatives “DevCo” appealed the moratorium. On July 6, 2020, the City Council ratified a “Standstill Agreement” between DevCo and the City. Under the Standstill Agreement, DevCo stays its appeal of the moratorium, the City holds final action on two docket items related to the moratorium (“Mixed-Income Housing in the CV Zone” and “Site Plan Review”), and DevCo and City staff attempt to reach agreement on the Solera project. The Standstill Agreement’s original standstill period was scheduled to end on August 31, 2020, but was subsequently extended to October 1, 2020 under Amendment No. 1 to Standstill Agreement. DevCo and City staff executed a short-term extension to October 8, 2020 as “Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement.” The short-term extension allowed DevCo and the City to continue negotiating a longer term extension to benefit both parties. The short-term extensions allowed City staff and DevCo to successfully complete their negotiations regarding the Solera project. The result of those negotiations is a substantive modification of the original Standstill Agreement (“Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement”) that, among other things, extends the standstill period to March 2021; sets forth land use permit processes, design expectations, and milestone deadlines for the Solera project; and includes a promise from DevCo to dismiss its existing appeal of the moratorium. EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper B. Amendment 2 to Standstill Agreement C. Amendment 3 to Standstill Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) Approve and ratify Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, extending the Standstill Agreement to October 8, 2020 and (2) approve and ratify Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, substantively modifying the Standstill Agreement, including extending the standstill period to March 2021. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:October 19, 2020 TO:Ruth Pérez, Council President Members of Renton City Council CC:Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM:C. E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director SUBJECT:Ratification of Two Extensions to DevCo Solera Standstill Agreement (“Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement” and “Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement”) Issues: 1. Should the City Council ratify a one-week extension to the Standstill Agreement with DevCo (“Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement”)? 2. Should the City Council ratify an extension of the Standstill Agreement with DevCo to on or about March 19, 2021, setting forth permit processes, design expectations, and milestone deadlines for the Solera project (“Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement”)? Background: Original June 2020 Standstill Agreement and Its First Amendment On April 6, 2020, City Council adopted a moratorium that prohibits the acceptance of permit applications for Large Residential Projects (>150 units) in the Sunset Area and fee waiver applications for Large Residential Projects. The purpose of the moratorium was to allow City staff to assess potential impacts that Large Residential Projects may have on the Sunset Area, as well as potential impacts to City finances if fee waivers are granted based on current Renton Municipal Code (RMC) provisions, and to propose code amendments to mitigate those potential impacts. In response, City staff initiated two docket items: “Mixed-Income Housing in the CV Zone” and “Waived Fees.” City staff had already initiated a docket item named “Site Plan Review” that would allow City planners to better ensure modifications to approved site plans mitigate negative impacts, where necessary, and ensure consistency with the RMC. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Ruth Pérez, Council President Page 2 of 4 October 19, 2020 A Large Residential Project in the Sunset Area, named “Solera,” was already entitled for construction prior to adoption of the moratorium, and the current representatives of that project, DevCo, appealed the moratorium. Subsequently, DevCo requested the City enter into a Standstill Agreement whereby DevCo would stay its appeal, the City Council would hold final action on “Mixed-Income Housing in the CV Zone” and “Site Plan Review,” and DevCo and City staff would attempt to resolve the dispute regarding the Solera project. DevCo and City staff agreed that the “Waived Fees” docket item could proceed irrespective of the Standstill Agreement. The City Council ratified the Standstill Agreement on July 6, 2020. The Standstill Agreement had an original expiration date of August 31, 2020. Although the parties progressed in their discussions, more time was needed to reach agreements regarding the Solera project. Thus, DevCo and City staff negotiated a short-term extension of the Standstill Agreement, moving the expiration date from August 31, 2020 to October 1, 2020 (“Amendment No. 1 to Standstill Agreement”). The City Council ratified Amendment No. 1 to Standstill Agreement on September 14, 2020. Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement (Additional one-week extension) The intent of Amendment No. 1’s short-term extension of the Standstill Agreement was to allow the parties to negotiate a longer-term extension that clearly set out a pathway to resolve the parties’ respective issues. City staff and DevCo found that they needed additional time to complete the negotiations; thus, the parties executed an additional extension of the standstill period, moving the expiration from October 1 to October 8 (“Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement”). Due to the time-sensitive nature of the Standstill Agreement’s expiration, City staff proceeded with executing Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement. However, the extension contains a ratification clause at its Section 4. Pursuant to that clause, if the City Council ratifies Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement, the agreement remains in effect. If the City Council does not ratify, the agreement automatically terminates. Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement (Substantive modification of Standstill Agreement; extension to March 2021) In October, City staff and DevCo successfully completed their negotiations regarding permitting for the Solera site. The negotiations resulted in a document (“Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement”) that substantively modifies the original Standstill Agreement, extending the standstill period to on or about March 19, 2021. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Ruth Pérez, Council President Page 3 of 4 October 19, 2020 Significant terms of Amendment No. 3 include the following: Confirms that the mixed-use blocks of DevCo’s Solera project will contain at least 50% unrestricted market rate units (Section 8 and Exhibit B); Defines land use permit types that apply to DevCo’s Solera project (Section 5.A) and establishes milestone deadlines for completing the land use permitting for the Solera project’s mixed-use blocks along Sunset Boulevard, with an estimated date of February 2, 2021 for public hearing before the City’s Hearing Examiner (Section 5.B); Confirms that the existing conditions of approval for the Solera site (established in 2018 and 2019) will continue to apply unless expressly agreed otherwise by DevCo and City staff or modified by the Hearing Examiner (Section 5.D.2); Memorializes design elements for DevCo’s Solera project that DevCo will present to the Hearing Examiner (Sections 6 and 7). Design elements include additional on-street parking to support commercial uses and the wrapping of the mixed-use blocks with active uses; Engages a public process for DevCo’s Solera project: (1) DevCo will hold a neighborhood meeting by October 20, 2020; (2) memorialized design elements are subject to change if public comment is received regarding such design elements; and (3) public involvement will be encouraged through the standard land use permitting process, including public hearing before the City’s Hearing Examiner; Clarifies how City staff will apply the City’s multi-family tax exemption provisions of RMC 4-1-220 to the Solera project, for review and action by the City Council (Section 9 and Exhibit C); and Makes no commitments about fee waivers for the Solera project, but acknowledges that DevCo could decide to independently approach the Ciyt Council about a fee waiver because fee waivers are a legislative matter (Section 10). Of additional benefit to the City, Amendment No. 3 allows City staff to present the “Mixed-Income Housing in the CV Zone” and “Site Plan Review” docket items to the City Council’s Planning & Development Committee for recommendation, with final City Council action still held until after the completion of the standstill period (Section 2). Finally, in exchange for the agreements related to the Solera project’s permit processing, DevCo will dismiss its Hearing Examiner appeal of the moratorium upon completion of the permitting process (Section 5.D.1). AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Ruth Pérez, Council President Page 4 of 4 October 19, 2020 Again due to the time-sensitive nature of the Standstill Agreement’s expiration, City staff proceeded with executing Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement. However, as with the prior extensions, the extension contains a ratification clause at its Section 11. Pursuant to that clause, if the City Council ratifies Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement, the agreement remains in effect. If the City Council does not ratify, the agreement automatically terminates. Recommendation: City staff recommend that: 1. City Council ratify Amendment No. 2 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, extending the Standstill Agreement to October 8, 2020. 2. City Council ratify Amendment No. 3 to Standstill Agreement with DevCo, setting forth land use permit processes, design expectations, and milestone deadlines for the Solera project, in exchange for DevCo’s promise to dismiss its existing appeal of the moratorium. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT (“Second Amendment”), dated for reference purposes only as October 1, 2020, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Solera, LLC, DevCo, LLC, and Solera Manager, LLC, each a Washington limited liability company (collectively, “DevCo”). The City and DevCo are each a “Party,” and are collectively the “Parties” to this Amendment. Once fully executed by the Parties, this Second Amendment is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties. Whereas, the City and DevCo entered into a Standstill Agreement dated June 24, 2020 (referred to herein as the “Agreement”); and Whereas, pursuant to the Agreement, the Standstill Period set forth in the Agreement’s Section 1.1 was set to expire on August 31, 2020; Whereas, the Standstill Period was extended through October 1, 2020 in Amendment No. 1 to Standstill Agreement, dated for reference purposes as August 31, 2020; and Whereas, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement again in order to extend the Standstill Period for a short duration; and Whereas, the Parties intend to use the short extension to continue their good faith negotiations toward a longer extension of the Standstill Period and substantive modifications to the Agreement, to the mutual benefit of the Parties. NOW THEREFORE, It is mutually agreed upon that the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Section 1.1 of the Agreement is amended to extend the Standstill Period to end on October 8, 2020. 2. The Parties will use the period between October 1, 2020 and October 8, 2020 to attempt, in good faith, to agree on a further extension of the Standstill Period and further amendments to the Agreement. 3. The Parties agree that they will communicate with the Hearing Examiner during this short one-week extension only if necessary to respond to an inquiry from the Hearing Examiner DocuSign Envelope ID: F2D42AE0-3AEF-4B06-BAC6-117590E5E20F AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 2 OF 3 or a development in the Appeal. Otherwise, the Parties will communicate with the Hearing Examiner after October 8, 2020. 4. The Parties agree that this Second Amendment responds to a time-sensitive situation due to the scheduled expiration of the Standstill Period on October 1, 2020, causing the Parties to need to execute this Amendment prior to review by the City Council. Accordingly, this Amendment is subject to City Council consideration, and City staff will present the Amendment to the City Council for ratification after execution by City staff. If the City Council considers the Amendment and does not ratify it, then the Amendment and the Agreement will automatically terminate with no liability or further obligation arising on the part of any Party. 5. All terms of the Agreement not explicitly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Amendment as of the date last signed by the Parties below. DEVCO, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Vice President/Managing Member _______________________________ Date SOLERA, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Managing Member _______________________________ Date SOLERA MANAGER, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Managing Member _______________________________ Date 10/1/2020 10/1/2020 10/1/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: F2D42AE0-3AEF-4B06-BAC6-117590E5E20F AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 3 OF 3 CITY By:____________________________ C.E. “Chip” Vincent Community & Economic Development Administrator _______________________________ Date Approved as to Legal Form: By:__________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney Contract Template Updated 01-15-2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: F2D42AE0-3AEF-4B06-BAC6-117590E5E20F 10/2/2020 | 10:02 AM PDT AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT (“Third Amendment”), dated for reference purposes only as October 8, 2020, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Solera, LLC, DevCo, LLC, and Solera Manager, LLC, each a Washington limited liability company (collectively, “DevCo” or the “Applicant”). The City and DevCo are each a “Party,” and are collectively the “Parties” to this Third Amendment. Once fully executed by the Parties, this Third Amendment is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties. Whereas, the City and DevCo entered into a Standstill Agreement dated June 24, 2020 (referred to herein as the “Agreement”); and Whereas, the Standstill Period set forth in the Agreement’s Section 1.1 was originally scheduled to expire on August 31, 2020; and Whereas, via Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (“First Amendment”), the Parties extended the Standstill Period from August 31, 2020 to October 1, 2020, for the purpose of attempting to negotiate, in good faith, a longer extension of the Standstill Period and substantive modifications to the Agreement, to the mutual benefit of the Parties; and Whereas, the Parties subsequently extended the Standstill Period to October 8, 2020 in Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (“Second Amendment”), and Whereas, the Parties have used the Standstill Period to negotiate in good faith, and the Parties have made significant progress to develop a joint vision for the Solera site. DevCo has prepared conceptual designs and floorplans for the City’s review, resulting in a concept design package (“Concept Design”) and renderings (“Renderings”) received by the City on September 24, 2020, and DevCo received detailed comment from City staff on October 2, 2020 (“October 2 Response”). The Concept Design, Renderings, and October 2 Response constitute Exhibit A and are on file with the City’s Community and Economic Development Department (“CED”); and Whereas, this Third Amendment incorporates the Parties’ negotiations, setting forth substantive modifications to the Agreement that the Parties believe are of benefit to DevCo, the City, and the public. NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed upon that the Agreement is amended as follows: Extension of and Modification to Standstill Period DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 2 OF 13 1. Section 1.1 of the Agreement is amended to extend the Standstill Period to end on March 19, 2021, or the date of the Final Decision (defined in Section 5.D.1), whichever occurs first. The extended Standstill Period is intended to provide sufficient time to accomplish the relevant permit processes described in this Third Amendment. 2. Section 1.3 of the Agreement is amended to allow City staff to seek a recommendation from the City Council Planning & Development Committee regarding the Sunset Development Changes during the Standstill Period. The Parties retain the Agreement’s restriction on enacting the Sunset Development Changes during the Standstill Period. 3. Section 1.5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: “DevCo shall file no permit or other land use applications with respect to Solera until the Moratorium (as may be extended) is lifted, except as (1) described under this Third Amendment, (2) allowed pursuant to any entitlements predating the Moratorium, or (3) agreed to in writing by the Parties. This provision shall (1) survive the expiration or termination of the Standstill Period and the Agreement and (2) control over any potentially conflicting term elsewhere in the Agreement.” 4. Within 5 business days after mutual execution of this Third Amendment, the Parties shall jointly request an extension of the stay of the Appeal through March 19, 2021. If the Hearing Examiner denies that request in whole or in part for any reason, then this Third Amendment, the Second Amendment, the First Amendment, and the Agreement will automatically terminate with no liability or further obligation arising on the pa rt of any Party. Solera Permitting 5. Land Use Permit Types and Processing. A. Permit Types. Within the Milestones set forth in Section 5.B, DevCo shall apply for and pursue (1) an RMC 4-9-200 “master plan major modification” approval for the entirety of the Solera site; (2) a single RMC 4-9-200 “site plan review” approval for at least Block A and Block B of the Solera site; and (3) a modification to the Solera preliminary plat. Furthermore, if DevCo seeks an exception from the Renton Municipal Code for aspects of the major modification permit or the site plan review permit, DevCo shall concurrently apply for and pursue, “modification(s)” to the Renton Municipal Code as set forth in RMC 4- 9-250. Collectively, the master plan major modification, site plan review, modification to preliminary plat, and potential modification(s) permits are hereinafter the “Solera Site Plan Permits.” At its own risk, on or after the date that the Hearing Examiner issues the decision on the Solera Site Plan Permits, DevCo may submit civil construction permit applications and building permit applications, provided that such applications are consistent with the Hearing Examiner’s decision on the Solera Site Plan Permits and subject to correction for any inconsistencies with the Final Decision (defined below). DevCo may submit the civil DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 3 OF 13 construction permit applications and building permit applications prior to the Hearing Examiner’s decision on the Solera Site Plan Permits if the Parties mutually and in writing determine that the project scope is fully defined and that there are no disagreements between the Parties regarding project design elements. B. Milestones. DevCo and the City shall meet the following Milestones for the Solera Site Plan Permits: (1) October 20, 2020: Date by which DevCo shall hold a neighborhood meeting pursuant to RMC 4-8-090.A. (2) November 3, 2020: Date by which DevCo shall submit its first pre-screening application materials to City staff. City staff shall provide written feedback to DevCo on or before November 12, 2020. (3) November 24, 2020: Date by which DevCo shall submit its second and final pre- screening application materials to City staff. City staff shall provide written feedback to DevCo on or before December 4, 2020. (4) December 16, 2020: Date by which DevCo shall submit complete applications to the City for the Solera Site Plan Permits. DevCo shall submit its complete applications to the City via a sharefile platform such as Dropbox (or similar submittal method agreed to by the Parties) to Matt Herrera, Senior Planner. (5) Seven (7) calendar days: After the December 16, 2020 date of application submittal, this is the maximum time interval between (a) CED sending to DevCo a written request for additional information or corrections or both and (b) DevCo sending to CED a complete response. (6) February 2, 2021: Date by which the public hearing shall be held before the City’s Hearing Examiner, if all Milestones are met without the extensions permitted below. The Parties agree to work in good faith to meet each of the Milestones set forth herein. To allow for moderate flexibility while still achieving the Parties’ mutual and primary goal of expediently processing the Solera Site Plan Permits, each Party has a cumulative total grace period of seven (7) calendar days that it can allocate in one-day or multiple- day intervals toward meeting that Party’s Milestones, provided, however, that December 24 and 25 and January 1 shall be exempt from counting against either Party’s grace period days. A Party’s use of one or more of its seven grace period days shall extend the other Party’s subsequent Milestone by the same number of days. C. CED’s Permit Processing. For as long as DevCo meets its deadlines set forth in Section 5.B, as may be extended in accordance with that Section, City staff shall timely, diligently, and in good faith process and move forward the Solera Site Plan Permits toward readiness for public hearing. The Solera Site Plan Permit applications are deemed to vest to the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code in effect on the Solera Approvals vesting date of August 7, 2018, notwithstanding the agreement of the Parties to meet or apply certain standards expressly provided herein that may exceed or vary from the vested development DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 4 OF 13 standards. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is intended to result in a successful master plan project at Solera for the benefit of the public, including the Applicant. D. Existing Approvals. (1) For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties acknowledge that this Standstill Agreement has no effect on the validity of the existing Solera approvals issued by the City’s Hearing Examiner on December 11, 2018 (original decision) and January 30, 2019 (decision on reconsideration) (collectively, the “Solera Approvals”). In addition, the Solera Site Plan Permit applications have no effect on the Solera Approvals until the City’s final decision on the Solera Site Plan Permits is issued, with (a) no appeals filed during the appeal period; or (b) any appeals filed being resolved in a manner acceptable to DevCo in its sole discretion, provided, however, that DevCo agrees that it will not appeal any aspect of the Solera Site Plan Permits that DevCo agreed to in the Agreement or its amendments, including this Third Amendment (“Final Decision”). Until such Final Decision is achieved, DevCo may withdraw the applications for Solera Site Plan Permits without any resulting effect on the existing Solera Approvals. On the date of the Final Decision, the Solera Site Plan Permits shall replace the Solera Approvals as entitlements for the Solera site, and within three (3) business days thereof DevCo shall withdraw the Appeal. (2) Conditions of approval as set forth in the Solera Approvals shall remain in effect unless the Parties agree or the Hearing Examiner determines to modify them. The Parties acknowledge that certain conditions of the Solera Approvals require actions to be undertaken prior to the submittal of a site plan application (for example, removal of the Renton Housing Authority’s adjacent parcel known as the Piha parcel from the Renton Sunset Redevelopment Master Plan, LUA14- 001475); the Parties agree to address in good faith whether such Solera Approval conditions can be timely met, or should be modified, to facilitate the timely submittal of the Solera Site Plan Permits, subject to later performance. If the Parties are unable to agree as to whether and/or how to modi fy a condition of approval in the Solera Approvals, each Party may present its respective view to the Hearing Examiner as an element of the Solera Site Plan Permits decision. E. Shift of NE 11th Street Alignment (Street Vacation / Dedication). Solera Approvals require a shifted alignment of NE 11th Street. This alignment shift requires DevCo to dedicate right-of-way along NE 11th Street. This alignment shift also requires the City to vacate a portion of NE 11th Street. Although the petition for the street vacation will be processed separately from the Solera Site Plan Permits, City staff will support approval of the street vacation, including a land trade (in lieu of payment) for the NE 11th dedication and the NE 11th street vacation, if an appraisal determines that the dedication area and vacation area land values are comparable. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 5 OF 13 6. Design Concept. This Section 6 describes key components of DevCo’s design concept. The size would increase over what was approved in the Solera Approvals for the two mixed-use buildings (“MU Buildings”), one on Block A and one on Block B, to allow larger residential units in the MU Buildings. MU Building B would incorporate townhome-style apartments along Jefferson, and MU Building A would incorporate them along Jefferson and NE 12th Street. Each MU Building would have a shared podium for commercial uses, residential amenities, parking and mechanical spaces, and other spaces accessory to the uses. Commercial use spaces would front NE Sunset Boulevard and wrap the corner at Sunset and NE 11th Street. Building heights of not to exceed 75-feet for Block A and 85-feet for Block B are within the CUP heights approved by the Solera Approvals. The City reviewed the Design Concept and Renderings in depth and provided comment to DevCo on October 2, 2020; those comments will be addressed in DevCo’s November 3, 2020 Milestone deadline. 7. Design Elements. DevCo agrees to incorporate the following design elements in the Solera Site Plan Permits; provided that, if public comment is received on any of these design elements, such design elements will be further discussed between DevCo and City staff and potentially subject to change based on the public comments received . This Section 7 is not meant to exclusively describe project design; this section captures agreements between the Parties made as a result of regular meetings to investigate the proposed modifications to the Solera Approvals as of the date of this Third Amendment. As additional design topics are identified by City staff or the Applicant, the Parties agree to address the same in good faith during the Standstill Period. A. Parking and Parking Structures. (1) DevCo will provide parallel parking on both sides of Jefferson Lane NE and NE 11th St. (2) DevCo will provide on-street angled parking within the Solera site along the Sunset Boulevard frontage road. In exchange, City staff will support a credit toward required commercial parking for the Solera site at a rate of one cre dit for every one parking space gained over the twenty-six (26) parking spaces that would have resulted from providing on-street parallel parking. (3) Residential and commercial uses shall wrap the parking structures with active uses, with the exception of areas of vehicular and pedestrian access to parking structures and with the exception of necessary utility and mechanical features, which will require screening. For the purposes of this provision, active uses include residential units, lobby, leasing, amenity, and commercial spaces. B. Commercial Design. (1) At least one ground floor commercial space in each of Blocks A and B shall provide grease traps and ventilation shafts for a commercial kitchen hood/exhaust; a central plumbing drain line; and ADA compliant bathrooms shall DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 6 OF 13 be provided for all commercial ground floor space which may be provided through use of common facilities. (2) Commercial frontage entries shall be at grade along Sunset Boulevard, which may be achieved by stepping the floor plates to provide entries to the commercial spaces at grade. C. Construction Phasing. DevCo will propose a new phasing plan, as a part of the Solera Site Plan Permits application, to allow construction of both mixed-use buildings (Blocks A and B) to precede the unit lot subdivision townhomes (Blocks C and D). The sequencing of constructing the mixed-use buildings before the unit lot subdivision townhomes is acceptable to the City. Market Rate and Affordable Housing. 8. Income Balanced Development. Within each of mixed-use Blocks A and B, at least fifty percent of the residential units will be Unrestricted Market Rate Units* and no more than fifty percent of units will be affordable for households with income below eighty percent (80%) of median income, and the average rent for all affordable units will not exceed the rate affordable for households with income below sixty percent (60%) of median income. CED accepts the Unit Distribution Chart attached as Exhibit B for market/affordable unit distribution, sizing, and number of bedrooms. Unit sizes and number of bedrooms may be adjusted by no more than 10% during design development for the Solera Site Plan Permits application, subject to City approval. The unit lot subdivision townhomes on Blocks C and D would be market rate unless otherwise approved by the City. * “Unrestricted Market Rate Units” means units for which homeowners (and renters, if rented) do not have income eligibility restrictions and the sale price (or rent, if applicable) is not artificially restricted in any manner. 9. Multi-Family Tax Exemption (MFTE). The Solera site is within the qualified area for application to the City’s current MFTE program, which is governed by RMC 4-1-220. For application of the MFTE program at Solera, where the Applicant expects to seek 12-year MFTE approvals, the Parties agree on the interpretations set forth at Exhibit C. Acknowledging that enrollment in the MFTE Program is a key component of the Applicant’s proposal, the Parties agree to further define the MFTE application and approva l requirements during the Standstill Period . In DevCo’s discretion, but no sooner than on or after the date that City staff issues its staff report to the Hearing Examiner (seven days before the Hearing Examiner public hearing), DevCo may submit its MFTE application, which the City will process and act on within 90 days. 10. Affordable Housing Fee Waiver Application. The Renton Municipal Code allows for waiver of impact fees for affordable housing at RMC 4-1-210, which City staff intend to present to City Council for updating during the Standstill Period. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 7 OF 13 limit DevCo’s ability to approach the City Council for consideration of an affordable housing fee waiver proposal for Solera. Miscellaneous 11. Ratification. The Parties agree that this Third Amendment responds to a time-sensitive situation due to the Agreement’s second extended expiration of the Standstill Period on October 8, 2020, causing the Parties to need to execute this Third Amendment prior to review by the City Council. Accordingly, this Third Amendment is subject to City Council consideration, and City staff will present the Third Amendment to the City Council at its first availability after the City’s date of execution. If the City Council considers the Third Amendment and does not ratify it, then the Third Amendment and the Agreement and its Second Amendment and First Amendment will automatically terminate with no liability or further obligation arising on the part of any Party. 12. Entire Agreement. This Third Amendment, together with the Agreement and Second Amendment and First Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to its subject matter. All terms of the Agreement, as modified by the First Amendment, not explicitly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect. 13. Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be executed in counterparts, and facsimile or electronic signatures (including signatures scanned and transmitted by email) shall be considered valid and binding as if original signatures. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Third Amendment as of the date last signed by the Parties below. DEVCO, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Vice President/Managing Member _______________________________ Date SOLERA, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Managing Member _______________________________ Date 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 8 OF 13 SOLERA MANAGER, LLC By:____________________________ David Ratliff Managing Member _______________________________ Date CITY By:____________________________ C.E. “Chip” Vincent Community & Economic Development Administrator _______________________________ Date Approved as to Legal Form: By:__________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney Contract Template Updated 01-15-2020 10/12/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 10/13/2020 | 8:38 AM PDT AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 9 OF 13 EXHIBIT A DevCo’s Concept Design and Renderings The remainder of this page intentionally left blank DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 10 OF 13 EXHIBIT B DevCo’s August 9, 2020 Market Rate Unit / Affordable Unit Matrix for Blocks A and B [See next page] DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) Exhibit C Multi-Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) Considering that the Project will potentially develop up to fifty percent (50%) of the mixed-use multi-family units as affordable housing units, DevCo intends to apply to the City for MFTE approval for some or all of the Project. The following criteria and standards will apply to the Project for MFTE application purposes. 1. For purposes of the application of the multi-building distribution requirement of RMC 4-1- 220.C.1.c.ii(e): 1.1 if an MFTE application includes only one of the Mixed-Use Blocks (Block A or Block B), then there is only one building, and RMC 4-1-220.C.1.c.ii(e) does not apply. 1.2 if an MFTE application includes both Mixed-Use Blocks (Block A and Block B), then there are two buildings, and RMC 4-1-220.C.1.c.ii(e) shall be satisfied if Block A’s mixed-use building and Block B’s mixed-use building each includes one or more affordable housing units, provided that between the two mixed-use buildings (Block A and Block B) the 20% affordable housing unit requirement of RMC 4-1-220.C.1.c.ii must be met. 2. If one or both of the unit lot subdivision townhome blocks (Block C or Block D or both) are included in the MFTE application for one or both of Blocks A and B, then the provision of RMC 4-1-220.D.2.b(iv), excluding market rate townhome projects from the MFTE program, does not apply; provided, however, that to the extent that the unit lot subdivision townhome blocks (Blocks C and D) are included in an application, they will be considered part of the project that is the subject of the MFTE application and subject to the same completion deadline of RMC 4-1- 220.D.5 for all the blocks included in the MFTE application. If one or both of the unit lot subdivision blocks are included in the MFTE application for one or both of Blocks A and B, the following shall apply regardless of the number of phases and buildings, the number of ownership entities, and/or the structure of the financing: (1) There shall be a single initial MFTE application, a single staff review and application approval process, a single MFTE contract with City Council approval, a single conditional certificate of tax exemption, a single final MFTE application, a single final certificate of tax exemption, and a single tax exemption period; (2) The single MFTE contract shall be signed by all of the ownership entities and recorded against all of the Solera parcels. All of the Solera ownership parties shall be individually and collectively responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the MFTE contract, including but not limited to the affordable housing requirements that qualify the project for a 12-year MFTE; and (3) There shall be a single annual report and certification (addressing all phases and buildings). The report shall be prepared by a qualified professional and paid for by the applicant. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) PAGE 2 OF 13 3. For the avoidance of doubt, even if the Project comes under multiple ownership or is constructed in more than one phase, or both, all of the requirements of RMC 4-1-220 must still be met. 4. The City’s MFTE program currently sunsets on December 31, 2021, unless extended by City Council action, which extension could include modifications. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EF3ED0A-BA39-4F24-92C7-AAC31E712F63 AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AB - 2718 City Council Regular Meeting - 19 Oct 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Renewal of HMA (Healthcare Management Administrators) contract for 2021 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Human Resources / Risk Management Department STAFF CONTACT: Ellen Bradley-Mak, Administrator EXT.: X7657 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Expenditure required : $360,000 Amount budgeted: $360,000 Note that this includes active employees and LEOFF 1 retirees SUMMARY OF ACTION: The administrative fees for HMA are increasing from $39.60 to $40.50 per month for each active member and retiree on our plan, an overall increase of 2.3%. Enrollment varies during the year, and is approximately 740 (660 active members and 80 retirees). Cost: 740 enrolled x $40.50/month x 12 months = $359,640 Note that the above amounts includes a discount for early renewal by 11/2/2020 of $0.20 per month for each enrolled employee/retiree. EXHIBITS: Revised HMA fee schedule for 2021 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the 2021 HMA Administrative Services Agreement Fee Schedule for medical and dental claims administration by HMA, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the implementing HMA contract documents when ready. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Proving What’s Possible in Healthcare® HMA CLIENT INTENT & EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF FEES 4034 City of Renton 1/1/2021 through 12/31/2021 Renewal Account Information Group Name: City of Renton Group: #4034 Group Size: 658 Employees 1,562 Members Network: HMA Contract Period: 1 Year Enrollment Type: Web How will Open Enrollment be submitted: Web Open Enrollment Dates: 11/1 - 11/30 Broker (firm): Gallagher Benefit Services - Bellevue Contact Info Name Phone Email Broker Contact: Nancy Kokenge (425) 974-4465 nancy_kokenge@ajg.com Account Manager: Cole Harrison (425) 289-5236 Cole.Harrison@accesstpa.com Client Specific Details To make changes, check the boxes in the ‘change?’ column. Provide a description of each change needed in the space provided in the far left column. Description Current Change? Describe changes needed here. Section 1557( (subject to Federal non- discrimination laws) Yes ☐ Balance Billing Protection Act* (Applicable to Washington Headquartered Clients Only) No ☐ *Any and all costs attributed to special member communications, negotiations and arbitration, including legal fees incurred by HMA while supporting the Plan in adhering to the Balance Billing Protection Act program requirements shall be passed through to the Plan for payment. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 2 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A Benefit Information and Change Requests Medical Benefits Please review and indicate desired changes in the space provide immediately each benefit. If you have changes for more than 6 plans, attach a list to your email when you send this form back to HMA. If you don’t need changes to any of the below benefit levels, skip to the next section. Pay close attention to the Health & Human Services’ guidance below regarding annual out-of-pocket maximums for 2021 The current proposed maximum annual limitation on cost sharing for the 2021 benefit year are (full document): • $8,550 for self-only coverage • $17,100 for family coverage This represents an approximately 4.9% increase above the 2020 parameters of $8,500 for self- only and $16,300 for family coverage. 4034 – Active (PPO) Benefit Preferred (P) Participating (N) Out-of-network (M) Current deductible None None None Changes (if any): Current out-of-pocket maximum $500 – Individual $875 – Family $500 – Individual $875 – Family $500 – Individual $875 – Family Changes (if any): Current copay – doctor’s office visit $30 copay, paid at 100% $30 copay, paid at 100% $30 copay, paid at 100% Changes (if any): 5034 – LEOFF (PPO) Benefit Preferred (P) Participating (N) Out-of-network (M) Current deductible None None None Changes (if any): Current out-of-pocket maximum Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Changes (if any): Current copay – doctor’s office visit Paid at 100% Paid at 100% Paid at 100% AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 3 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A 5034 – LEOFF (PPO) Benefit Preferred (P) Participating (N) Out-of-network (M) Changes (if any): Vendors List any vendors the client utilizes for services outside of HMA’s Administation and include vendor name with contact information. Please note that if you choose to work with a non-preferred vendor we may not be able to integrate eligibility, claims reporting or accumulators and additional fees may apply. Vendor type Change? Current vendor name & information New vendor name & information Member Advocacy or Concierge Service ☐ Gallagher CDHP* ☐ None COBRA ☐ HMA Internal Provided Dental ☐ HMA Kidney Dialysis ☐ Covered under HMA Medical Plan Maternity ☐ None PBM ☐ Costco Health Solutions (877) 908-6024 Stop Loss ☐ Symetra (800) 796-3872 Vision ☐ HMA Internal Provided Telehealth ☐ MDLive, Inc. (877) 596-8826 * Consumer-driven Health Plan (CDHP), e.g. HRA, FSA, HSA, LPFSA, DCRA. Locations Review this list of locations. Check the box to the left if you need to make a change to a location (example: remove, add new, update name or address). Then, in the ‘change needed’ column, provide a description of the change needed. Change? Location Change needed Effective Date AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 4 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A ☐ Active ☐ COBRA Fees Medicare Part D Testing Complete Medicare’s Creditable Coverage Requirements. Electing Description Fee ☒ Yes, request NW Actuaries to complete the determination of employer compliance with Medicare Part D. A finalized SPD is required to complete request. $385 per plan Claim Administrative Fees Rates for the contracted time period apply to services administered by HMA. Fees for outside vendors are subject to change at any time. HMA fees and commissions may remain in effect beyond the above-stated term until changed by mutual written agreement of the parties. Fee Description $23.70 PEPM for Medical Plan Administration Includes pharmacy interface + integrated OOP maximum/QHDHP administration If all documents are signed and returned by 11/2/2020, the new PEPM with $0.20 discount will be $23.50. $5.50 HMA PPO Network Access $3.75 PEPM Care Management base services 30% of savings Claims negotiation, hospital bill audit, and out-of-network claim re-pricing services as outlined in TPA agreement section 4 27% of recovered funds Subrogation services as outlined in Section 4(i) of Exhibit B The plan will receive 73% of recovered funds. Of the remaining, 22% is retained by PHIA, and 5% is retained by HMA.* * In the event of litigation to enforce the Plan’s right of recovery, PHIA’s fee will increase to 33.3% and shall not retain any compensation. 16-18% of recovered amount charged as contingency fee Overpayment prevention & recovery as outlined in Section 4(i) of Exhibit B 16%-18% recovery fee retained by Accent* * Note, the contingency fee charged by Accent varies based on the age of the underlying claim. In no instance will the total fee to the Plan exceed 18% of the amount recovered. 30% of savings charged as contingency fee Fraud, waste, and abuse as outlined in Section 4(i) of Exhibit B o 17.5% of savings retained by Change Healthcare Solutions o 12.5% administrative allowance retained by HMA Additional Products and Services AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 5 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A Review the buy-up product and service options below. Check the box in the Continue, Add, or Remove columns to indicate your selected action for each item. If you are simply continuing all of your existing product and services, then check ‘Continue’ next to all of those services. Some products and services are offered through partners on our contract. Should pricing changes occur during the plan year, we will make every effort to notify you at least 30 days in advance of the price change. Current Plan Year Continue Add Remove Renewal Plan Year Service Description & Cost $3.25 ☒ ☐ ☐ $3.25 PEPM for Dental Plan Administration $1.50  ☐ ☐ $1.50 PEPM for HMA National Dental Network Access (In addition to the Dental Plan Administration fees) $0.65 ☒ ☐ ☐ $0.65 PEPM Vision Hardware Administration $1.35 PEPM COBRA Services ☒ ☐ ☐ Medical/Rx $1.35 ☒ ☐ ☐ Vision ☒ ☐ ☐ Dental ☐ ☐ ☐ FSA administered by HMA HealthEquity ☐ ☐ ☐ Health Reimbursement Account (HRA) administration $3.95 Per Account Per Month (PAPM) Visa card: Up to two cards free. Additional or replacement cards are $10 per card. Annual Fees: see “HealthEquity Annual Fees” in previous section. Note – Only one PAPM fee is charged if an individual has more than one (1) FSA and/or HRA. This does not apply to LPFSA and HSA plan type(s). ☐ ☐ ☐ Flexible Spending Account (FSA) administration $3.95 Per Account Per Month (PAPM) Visa card: Up to two cards free. Additional or replacement cards are $10 per card. Annual Fees: see “HealthEquity Annual Fees” in previous section. Note – Only one PAPM fee is charged if an individual has more than one (1) FSA and/or HRA. This does not apply to LPFSA and HSA plan type(s). ☐ ☐ ☐ Dependent Care FSA (DC FSA / DCRA) administration $3.95 Per Account Per Month (PAPM) Visa card: Up to two cards free. Additional or replacement cards are $10 per card. Annual Fees: see “HealthEquity Annual Fees” in previous section. Note – Only one PAPM fee is charged if an individual has more than one (1) FSA and/or HRA. This does not apply to LPFSA and HSA plan type(s). AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 6 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A Current Plan Year Continue Add Remove Renewal Plan Year Service Description & Cost ☐ ☐ ☐ Health Savings Account (HSA) administration $2.70 Per Account Per Month (PAPM) Visa card: Up to three free cards. Additional or replacement cards are $5 per card. Annual Fees: see “HealthEquity Annual Fees” in previous section. Note – HSA accounts coupled with an LPFSA will be billed at $4.65 PAPM ($2.70 PAPM for HSA + $1.95 PAPM for LPFSA) ☐ ☐ ☐ Limited Purpose FSA (LPFSA) administration $1.95 Per Account Per Month (PAPM) Visa card: Up to two free cards. Additional or replacement cards are $10 per card. Annual Fees: see “HealthEquity Annual Fees” in previous section. Note – LPFSA accounts coupled with an HSA will be billed at $4.65 PAPM ($1.95 PAPM for LPFSA + $2.70 PAPM for HSA) ☐ ☐ ☐ $2.00 PEPM The Plan-appointed claim evaluator “PACE” Fiduciary service ☐ ☐ ☐ $2.00 PEPM - Healthcare Bluebook, Fair Price, Facility & Doctor Quality transparency tool, and the cost of the Go Green to Get Green Rewards program MDLive Telehealth offers four product options: Choose one product option below and then designate copays, coinsurance, and deductibles. (Virtual visit claim fee rates subject to change with 30 days notice) ☐ ☐ ☐ $1.60 PEPM Medical plus Behavioral Health (Counseling & Psychiatry) and Dermatology + $55 per virtual visit claim fee for Medical + $80-$260 per virtual visit claim fee for Behavioral Health + $60 per virtual visit claim fee Dermatology (Virtual visit claim fee rates subject to change with 30 days notice) ☐ ☐ ☐ $1.35 PEPM Medical plus Behavioral Health (Counseling & Psychiatry) + $55 per virtual visit claim fee for Medical + $80-$260 per virtual visit claim fee for Behavioral Health (Virtual visit claim fee rates subject to change with 30 days notice) ☐ ☐ ☐ $1.30 PEPM Medical plus Dermatology + $55 per virtual visit claim fee + $60 per virtual visit claim fee Dermatology (Virtual visit claim fee rates subject to change with 30 days notice) $1.00 ☒ ☐ ☐ $1.00 PEPM Medical Only + $55 per virtual visit claim fee (Virtual visit claim fee rates subject to change with 30 days notice) MDLIVE Telehealth copay, coinsurance, and deductibles. Check the boxes that apply for your Plan(s) and fill in the blanks for each checked option. ☐ ☐ ☐ PPO plan member copay amount of $________ per virtual visit, deductible waived AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 7 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A Current Plan Year Continue Add Remove Renewal Plan Year Service Description & Cost ☐ ☐ ☐ PPO plan member copay amount of $________ per virtual visit after deductible met ☐ ☐ ☐ $1.50 PEPM - Care Navigator ☐ ☐ ☐ $6.50 PEPM - Disease Management, Wellness Hub & Wellness Coaching * Incorporates $1.00 PEPM discount for buying all three services in a bundle. ☐ ☐ ☐ $3.00 PEPM First Year Only Discount $3.50 PEPM at Renewal - Disease Management – Includes nurse coaching and outreach for six major chronic conditions—diabetes, asthma, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and depression. ☐ ☐ ☐ $2.50 PEPM - Wellness Coaching - Includes unlimited inbound health coaching via phone, email, or video conferencing for working on wellness goals such as stress management, tobacco cessation, eating healthier and being more physically active. ☐ ☐ ☐ $1.50 PEPM - Wellness Hub - includes a personal health assessment, individual and company challenges, fitness device and app integration, health decision support tools, and a customizable wellness incentive tracker. ☐ ☐ ☐ Incentive Administration – Available only in combination with the Wellness Hub. Incentive administration support is available for outcomes-based incentives and includes 5 hours of customized incentive campaign design, creation, management, and tracking. Standard reporting is available. Additional Wellness Program or custom reporting hours are available for $125 per hour. ☐ ☐ ☐ $350.00 Per Case - Maternity Program (MommyTrax) ☐ ☐ ☐ $0.65 PEPM - 24 Hour Nurse Line (CareNet) ☐ ☐ ☐ ID re-card fee - $2.00 per employee (Incidental individual card replacement or reissue available upon member request through our portal at no cost) Excess Loss Services In compensation for the work that HMA does to support excess loss carriers, HMA receives an administrative allowance of 2.5% from most of our preferred carriers. If you are using a non-preferred carrier, there will be an interface fee of 3.0% of excess loss premium that is assessed to the group in lieu of the administrative allowance. These excess loss fees will be reflected on the invoice on a PEPM basis. HMA reserves the right to decline to work with non-preferred excess loss carriers. If we agree to administer a plan with an excess loss carrier that is not preferred, we will charge an interface fee of 3.0% of excess loss premium and will ask for a signed waiver of liability from the group. For carriers where we are not an approved benefit administrator, HMA reserves the right to decline to proceed with the approval process at our discretion. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 8 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A For new groups, the interface fee for non-preferred carriers is based on the carriers projected enrollment and premium rates. For renewing groups, the interface fee for non-preferred carriers is calculated based on the final stop loss renewal premium rates and enrollment for the last month of the prior contract period. The rates are calculated as follows: [.03 x (single Specific Stop Loss Premium Rate x single enrollment) + (family Specific Stop Loss Premium Rate x family enrollment) + (Aggregate Stop Loss Premium Rate x total enrollment)] / Total Enrollment  I’ve read and accept the above terms regarding Excess Loss Services. Other Comments Please use the below section to include other notes or comments. Client Insight Recommendations HMA continuously strives for innovation and excellence in serving you. Please see your Client Insights PDF for more information on our recommendations for your Plan. Check the corresponding boxes below for the recommendation you want to implement. Remove/Exclude Add/ Accept Benefit Recommendations ☐ ☒ Leave of Absence Due to Furlough Automatically trigger extended eligibility when Plan is subject to state or federal mandates due to a declared emergency, includes built-in and automatic sunset provision when the emergency ends. Gene & Cellular Therapies (Requires Pre-Authorization): Choose one of the two coverage options below if accepting this recommendation: ☐ ☐ In-network 100% coverage, deductible applies, and no coverage out-of-network, or ☐ ☐ Insert desired in-network coinsurance _________%, deductible applies, and no coverage out-of- network AGENDA ITEM #7. d) HMA Client Intent & TPA Exhibit A – City of Renton Page 9 of 9 4034 City of Renton 2021.01 Client Intent Exhibit A Remove/Exclude Add/ Accept Benefit Recommendations If accepting the Gene & Cellular Therapies benefit recommendation, confirm whether to include or exclude travel benefits, then Insert desired coinsurance _________%, or Define maximum allowable travel benefit $___________ (only if you desire to limit the benefit) Genetic Testing: Currently covered under the laboratory benefit. HMA built a separate benefit to better track utilization. Insert desired coinsurance 100% if accepting this recommendation, and Choose one option below if choosing this recommendation: Deductible waived, or Deductible applies ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Acceptance IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the respective dates set forth below, effective as of the day and year first above written. By: 4034 City of Renton X By: Healthcare Management Administrators X Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: AGENDA ITEM #7. d) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CLEANING UP CERTAIN  CODE PROVISIONS BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4‐1‐045.B, 4‐1‐045.F.1, 4‐1‐ 045.F.2, 4‐1‐045.F.7, 4‐1‐060.D, AND 4‐1‐070.B.1; SECTION 4‐1‐085; SUBSECTION  4‐1‐110.E; SECTION 4‐1‐180; SUBSECTIONS 4‐1‐190.D.22, 4‐1‐190.F, 4‐1‐190.G.1,  4‐1‐190.G.2, 4‐1‐190.H.1, 4‐1‐190.H.2, AND 4‐1‐190.H.4; SECTION 4‐1‐200;  SUBSECTIONS 4‐1‐220.A, 4‐1‐220.D.1, 4‐1‐230.C, 4‐1‐240.B.1, 4‐1‐240.B.2, 4‐2‐ 020.J, 4‐2‐080.A.6, 4‐2‐080.A.16, 4‐2‐080.A.28, 4‐2‐100.B, 4‐2‐110.E.4.a, 4‐2‐ 120.A, AND 4‐7‐060.D; SECTION 4‐9‐010; SUBSECTIONS 4‐9‐020.D.2, 4‐9‐025.D.2,  4‐9‐090.F.1, 4‐9‐090.F.2, 4‐9‐090.F.3, 4‐9‐140.C, 4‐9‐150.F.2, 4‐9‐150.F.4, 4‐9‐ 180.E, AND 4‐9‐220.C; THE DEFINITION OF AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA) IN  SECTION 4‐11‐010; SUBSECTIONS 9‐16‐4.D, 9‐16‐4.E, AND 9‐16‐8.C OF THE  RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING  AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, this ordinance is the result of a chapter‐by‐chapter review of Renton  Municipal Code addressing non‐substantive issues related to obsolete code sections,  interdepartmental divisions and employee titles, and improves overall consistency related to  language and formatting; and   WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on May 5, 2020, the City notified the State of  Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 20, 2020, considered  all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently forwarded  a recommendation to the City Council;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. Subsection 4‐1‐045.B of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  B. GENERAL:  Vesting of applications is governed by the rules of RCW 19.27.095, (Building  permit application – Consideration – Requirements), and  RCW 58.17.033,   (Proposed division of land – Consideration of application for  preliminary plat or short plat approval – Requirements defined by local  ordinance), as they exist or may be amended. The vested rights doctrine shall not  be applied more broadly than its intended scope.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐1‐045.F.1, 4‐1‐045.F.2, and 4‐1‐045.F.7 of subsection 4‐1‐ 045.F of the Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐ 045.F remain in effect and unchanged.  F. DURATION OF APPROVALS:  1. Building Permits: Development of a building shall be based on the  controls contained in the approved permit application. Vesting rights applicable  to building permit applications would expire pursuant to permit expiration periods  identified in the International Building Code (IBC) and adopted by reference herein  in RMC 4‐5‐050, International Building Code, as it exists or may be amended.  2. Preliminary Plat: Development of an approved preliminary plat shall be  based on the controls contained in the Hearing Examiner’s decision. A final plat  meeting all of the requirements of the preliminary plat approval shall be  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  submitted within the time frame specified in RMC 4‐7‐080L, Expiration Period,  unless a different time limitation was specifically authorized in the final approval.  3. Final Plat: The lots in a final plat may be developed by the terms of  approval of the final plat, and the development regulations in effect at the time  the preliminary plat application was deemed complete for a period of five (5) years  from the recording date unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a  serious threat to the public health, safety or welfare.  4. Conditional Use Permit: The use authorized in a conditional use permit  shall be allowed to develop for a period of two (2) years from the effective date  of the permit approval unless a different time limitation was specifically  authorized in the final approval. The development of an approved conditional use  permit shall be governed by the terms of approval of the permit unless the City  finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to the public health,  safety or welfare.  5. Permits Associated with a Preliminary Plat: Permit applications, such as  Planned Urban Developments (PUD) applications that are approved as a  companion to a preliminary plat application, shall remain valid for the duration of  the preliminary and final plat as provided in subsections F2 and 3 of this Section,  as they exist or may be amended.  6. Short Plat: The lots in a short plat may be developed by the terms and  conditions of approval, and the development regulations in effect at the time the  application was deemed complete for a period of five (5) years from the recording  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  date unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to  the public health, safety or welfare.  7. Shoreline Development Permits: An approved Shoreline Permit shall be  allowed to develop pursuant to the time limitations listed in RMC 4‐9‐190J, (Time  Requirements for Shoreline Permits), as it exists or may be amended. The  development of an approved shoreline permit shall be governed by the terms of  approval of the permit unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a  serious threat to the public health, safety or welfare.  8. All approvals described in this Section shall be vested for the specific  use, density, and physical development identified in the permit approval.  SECTION IV. Subsection 4‐1‐060.D of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  D. ADOPTION:  The Comprehensive Plan and any amendments and associated subarea plans  area adopted by ordinance of the City Council after public hearing by the Council.  SECTION V. Subsection 4‐1‐070.B.1 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐070.B remain in effect and unchanged.  B. INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  In order to fully accomplish the objectives and principles of the  Comprehensive Plan, all resolutions and regulations of the City concerned with  the development and welfare of the community and its people shall be considered  in light of the principles, objectives and policies set forth in the Plan. To fulfill the  requirements of chapters 35.63 and 36.70A RCW, and in the interest of public  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  safety, health, morals and the general welfare, the following instruments will  implement the Comprehensive Plan:  1. Title 4 – Development Regulations:  Chapter 1    Administration and Enforcement  Chapter 2    Zoning Districts: ‐ Uses and Standards  Chapter 3    Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts  Chapter 4    City‐Wide Property Development Standards  Chapter 5    Building and Fire Prevention Standards  Chapter 6    Street and Utility Standards  Chapter 7    Subdivision Regulations  Chapter 8    Permits – General and Appeals  Chapter 9    Permits – Specific  Chapter 10    Legal Nonconforming Structures, Uses and Lots  Chapter 11    Definitions  2. Title 8 – Health and Sanitation:  Chapter 2    Storm and Surface Water Drainage  Chapter 4    Water  Chapter 5    Sewers  Chapter 6    Solid Waste Utility  Chapter 7    Noise Level Regulations   3. Title 10 – Traffic:  Chapter 10    Parking Regulations   AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  SECTION VI. Section 4‐1‐085 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  4‐1‐085 PROCEDURAL AND NON‐SUBSTANTIVE TEXT AMENDMENTS:  The Community and Economic Development Administrator is hereby authorized  to amend text of procedural or non‐substantive provisions of this Title. For the  purposes of this Section, substantive amendments shall be distinguished from  procedural or non‐substantive amendments in accordance with the following:  “Substantive” matters relate to regulations that define or limit what can be done  in terms of conduct, use, development, or action (e.g., what use may be made of  land, what requirements apply to development, what public infrastructure may  be required of certain developments, which decision makers and appellate bodies  act on permit applications), and “procedural” or “non‐substantive” matters are  those that relate to procedures or submittal requirements (e.g., how applications  will be processed by a decision maker, what application forms must be used).   SECTION VII. Subsection 4‐1‐110.E of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  E. CRITERIA FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION:  Any permit, or other land use approval issued by the City pursuant to this  Title, may be suspended, revoked or modified on one or more of the following  grounds:  1. The approval was obtained by fraud;  2. The approval was based upon inaccurate, incomplete or misleading  information provided by the applicant;  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  3. The holder of the permit or approval interferes with the Administrator  or any authorized representative in the performance of his or her duties related  to the permit or approval; or  4. The holder of the permit or approval fails to comply with any notice and  order issued pursuant to code compliance regulations; or  5. The holder of the permit or approval fails to comply with the condition  precedent or subsequent to the granting of the permit or land use approval.  SECTION VIII. Section 4‐1‐180 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  4‐1‐180 CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES  Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not  been assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities,  such as water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water systems, and street  improvements including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more  of the charges listed in the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure. Any fees  triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this Section, are due  and payable at the first of the following instances:   Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit; or   Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family  residential short plat; or   Prior to the issuance of a building permit.; and   In all cases, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (either  temporary or final).  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  All of the following charges shall be paid into the appropriate utility or street fund  except that any fees collected under a private latecomer’s agreement shall be  passed on to the holder of the agreement with the applicable fees paid to the  appropriate utility or street fund.  A. PRIVATELY HELD LATECOMER’S FEES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT  (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CITY HELD LATECOMER’S) FEES:  1. Applicability of Privately Held Latecomer’s Fee: The City has the  discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9‐5 RMC, to grant street latecomer’s  agreements to developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rata portion  of street improvements including signalization and lighting they install and turn  over to the City. The City shall grant utility latecomer’s agreements for the  reimbursement of a pro rata portion of utility systems such as water, sanitary  sewer or storm sewer, if all conditions are met. For purposes of this section, both  utility and street latecomer’s agreements shall be collectively referred to as  “latecomer’s agreements.”   2. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment  charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rata portion of the original  costs of public works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems,  storm water systems, and street improvements including signalization and  lighting) from the owners of property who would benefit from future connections  to, or future users of, improvements to the City’s infrastructure that were not  installed by LIDs or by a private developer under a latecomer agreement. The  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9  imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges are  detailed in chapter 9‐16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be  charged pursuant to RMC 9‐16‐6, Payments to City.   3. Exemptions for Latecomer’s or Special Assessment District Fees:   a. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private  developer latecomer’s fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of  land per subsection C of this Section.  b. Relief Due to Two (2) Similar Facilities: The Public Works  Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer’s or special  assessment district fee/assessment if the property has a benefit from either (but  not both) of two (2) similar facilities. The Public Works Administrator will make  the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(ies)  benefit and/or are utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that  associated with the utilized facility. If there are no sound engineering or policy  reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City shall give the applicant  the choice of facilities to utilize.   c. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer’s  agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the  latecomer’s agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that  the assessment against a parcel be divided such that a single family residential  connection will be assessed based upon the size of a typical single family  residential lot in that area. The remainder of the cost attributed to said site will be  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased  density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue  on the remaining portion of the assessment.  d. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The  Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer’s  assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose  other than single family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front  footage, area, or other equitable means. Consideration may be given to adjusting  the assessment between the new parcels, based upon value of benefit from the  improvements, such that two (2) similar parcels may pay different amounts  because one receives more benefit.   B. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES (SDC) – WATER, WASTEWATER, AND  STORM WATER:   The City has authority under RCW 35.92.025 to impose charges, which are  commonly referred to as “system development charges,” on property owners in  order that said property owners shall bear their equitable cost share of the City’s  utility system(s).  1. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development  charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said  properties that are benefiting from and/or increasing the level of usage of the  City’s utility systems. Said property owner(s) shall pay, prior to connection to or  benefit from a City utility system, the system development charge associated with  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  11  that utility as detailed in the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure. A parcel may  benefit from a City utility system during the development or redevelopment of the  property with or without a connection to an established facility. Therefore, the  system development charge for a utility may be triggered without a physical  connection to an existing facility.  a. “Utility system” shall mean:  •    The sanitary sewer system, including but not limited to lift stations,  force mains, interceptors and other sewer mains.;  •    The storm water system, including but not limited to flow control  or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements, lift stations, force  mains, interceptors, and other storm water storage, treatment, collection and  conveyance systems used for management of storm water runoff.; and  •    The water system, including but not limited to wells, pump stations,  water treatment facilities, reservoirs and water mains.   b. The phrase “increasing the level of usage of a City utility system(s),”  as used in this Section, shall mean any of the following:  • First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property that is  connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time  (including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or  conversion from septic system).; and  • Property that is being improved, developed, redeveloped, or  subdivided and as part of said action has installed an additional water meter(s),  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  12  has installed a larger water meter(s) or creates additional impervious surface (for  the purpose of this code, conversion of a gravel area to asphalt, concrete, or other  impervious surface shall be considered additional impervious surface).  c. The basis for the charge of system development charges shall be:  • Storm Water: The addition of any new impervious surface to  properties will require payment of the system development charge for storm  water for the additional new impervious surface only. If a property is making a  connection for the first time to a storm water system, it will only require payment  of the system development charge for storm water for the impervious surface  tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to  property that does not create additional impervious surface or does not cause a  first time connection to be made will not require payment of the system  development charge for storm water.  New single family development will pay based upon a flat rate per  dwelling unit. Existing single family development that has previously connected  will pay based upon square foot of additional impervious surface. Existing single  family development that is connecting for the first time will pay based upon a flat  rate per dwelling unit. Commercial and multi‐family development will pay based  upon square foot of additional impervious surface.  •  Wastewater: The addition of a new domestic water meter,  increasing the size of an existing domestic water meter, conversion of a non‐ domestic water meter to domestic use, or the first time connection of a property  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  13  to the sanitary sewer system will require payment of the system development  charge. For each additional domestic meter installed, the charge shall be based  upon the size of the additional meter(s). For each increased domestic meter, the  charge shall be for the size of the new domestic meter minus the charge for the  domestic meter being replaced. For the conversion of a non‐domestic water  meter to domestic use, the charge will be based upon the size of the meter  converted to domestic use. For the first time connection of an existing developed  property to the sewer system, the charge shall be based upon the size of the  domestic meters for the property.  • Water: The addition of a new domestic or irrigation water meter,  increasing the size of an existing water meter, or the addition of a service for fire  protection will require the payment of the system development charge. For each  additional meter installed, the charge shall be based upon the size of the  additional meter(s). For each increase in meter size, the charge shall be for the  size of the new meter minus the charge for the meter being replaced. For the  addition or increase in size of a service for fire protection, the charge shall be  based upon the size of the fire service, not (NOT the size of the detector bypass  meter).  d. Charges Not Refunded for a Reduction In Service: System  development charges will not be refunded if the service basis, as described above,  is reduced. The service level, prior to reduction, may be considered as existing  level of service as described below.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  14  e. Existing Level of Service: The existing level of service shall be the  baseline for any additional system development charges. Said baseline level of  service shall be determined by existing connections; existing size, type and  number of water meters; and existing impervious surfaces. When a previously  developed property has participated in demolition of existing improvements, then  the baseline level of service shall be the highest level of developed condition  within the five (5) year period preceding the date of application. Any development  of the property that has been removed for more than five (5) years shall not be  considered when calculating additional fees. For demolished impervious surfaces,  the City reserves the right to utilize construction drawings, aerial photos, or  topographic maps to best determine square footage of impervious surface prior  to demolition.  For storm water, when increasing the level of density of single family  by the addition of units or redevelopment to commercial or multi‐family, the  existing level of service baseline shall be as follows: when the existing level of  service is single family and the proposed service is single family, the baseline shall  be existing dwelling units. When the existing level of service is single family and  the proposed service is other than single family, the baseline shall be the square  footage equivalent of the existing dwelling units.  For example, if a property owner removed all improvements from a  two (2) acre parcel that had a one‐inch (1") domestic water meter, a one‐inch (1")  irrigation water meter, was connected to sanitary sewer, and was fifty percent  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  15  (50%) impervious and that parcel sat vacant for two (2) years, those improvements  would be considered when calculating additional system development charges.  Exceptions:  The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single family  residential dwelling will not trigger a system development charge for water or  sewer.  The addition of a second domestic meter to an existing duplex in order  to divide consumption for billing purposes will not trigger a system development  charge.  Improvements to existing single family residential units that have had  the system development charge for storm water paid per dwelling unit shall be  exempt from charges for additional impervious surfaces unless the additional  impervious surface is created by the addition of single family units or by  development other than single family.  Improvements to existing single family residential units such as  additions that are less than five hundred (500) square feet of new impervious  surface are exempt from the system development charge for storm water unless  a new connection to the Renton storm water system is proposed or required as  part of the permit application.  2.  Exemptions to System Development Charge:  a. Installation of an Irrigation Meter Solely for the Purpose of  Providing Irrigation Water to City Right‐of‐Way: Installation of a water meter  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  16  solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water to City right‐of‐way is  exempted from the system development charge.  b. Exemption for City‐Owned Property: No system development  charge will be collected on City‐owned properties. The benefits to the utility from  the use of other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other  benefits offset the amount of the system development charge.  c. Storm Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments that  infiltrate or contain on site one hundred percent (100%) of the on‐site storm water  runoff volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the storm  water system development charge. For the application of this credit, the  owner/developer must use the current design criteria to show that the infiltration  facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff produced from the site during the  one hundred (100) year storm.  For purposes of this code, “on‐site” includes all land within the  boundary of the development. If the development benefits from the City storm  water system because the city system provides drainage for any of the lots, tracts,  roadways, etc., within the development, it will not qualify for this exemption.  If a development that is granted an exemption under this Section  discharges water off‐site during a one hundred (100) year storm or less, the  development shall be required to make corrections or improvements to the on‐ site system such that it will infiltrate up to the one hundred (100) year storm. If,  in the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one hundred percent  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  17  (100%) of the on‐site storm water runoff from a one hundred (100) year storm,  the system development charge shall be due and payable as a condition of the  connection to or utilization of the City’s storm water system.  Nothing in this Section shall relieve the property owner(s) from  complying with the City’s current flow control and water quality treatment  standards at the time the development converts from one hundred percent  (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a development is  converted from one hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm  system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing  conditions prior to the property being developed under the one hundred percent  (100%) infiltration exemption and the developed conditions at the time the  conversion is made.  There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely  prohibit the use of infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard  prohibits or limits the use of infiltration facilities to any level below the one  hundred (100) year storm, the development will not qualify for this exemption.  d. Storm Water Exemption for Direct Discharge to Lake Washington:  Developments with property directly abutting the Lake Washington shoreline that  direct discharges one hundred percent (100%) of the on‐site storm water runoff  to the lake through their own private storm system located solely on the  development property(ies) are exempt from the storm water system  development charge. If the development benefits from the City storm water  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  18  system because the city system provides drainage for any of the lots, tracts,  roadways, etc., within the development, it will not qualify for this exemption. Any  direct discharge to waters or natural drainage courses other than Lake  Washington will not qualify for this exemption.   C. SEGREGATION CRITERIA AND RULES:   Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for  the segregation of special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charges (if  permitted by the latecomer’s agreement) if there is partial development of a large  parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the following criteria and  rules:  1.  Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the  basis of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel  size. Unplatted or large‐platted parcels may be platted or short‐platted prior to  development, in which case the special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s  charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed.  2. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial  development of a large tract of property, the owner may apply for a segregation  of the special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge(s) for the specific  portion of the property to be developed. The burden of establishing the  segregation by legal description, number of units, and map would be on the party  owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall determine the  segregation of fees:  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  19  a. Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the  exception of single family residential home developments.  b. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal,  written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall  be recorded as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive  covenant shall list the percentage of the special assessment district, and/or  latecomer’s charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall  also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the  proposed development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as  described in the legal description, for the special assessment district, and/or  latecomer’s charge determination.   c. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for  determination and payment of special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s  charge(s) shall be two (2) acres. The segregated area shall include, but not be  limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the special assessment  district, and/or latecomer’s charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings;  driveways and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access  areas; storm water systems; and improvements required for mitigation of  environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The  boundary line for the segregation of special assessment district, and/or  latecomer’s charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall  not be closer than fifteen feet (15') to any structure.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  20  d. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of  undeveloped property for which the special assessment district, and/or  latecomer’s charge is deferred shall be two (2) acres. Should the property partially  paid for under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the special  assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge fee in place at the time of  development. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later be  subdivided, then the partial payment credit shall run with the subdivided lots. The  burden of establishing that the partial payment has been made would be on the  party owing the fee and not on the City.  e. Determination of Charge: The special assessment district, and/or  latecomer’s charge shall be determined on the basis of the percentage of a  property that is developed (existing development plus proposed development).  When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of full  development, as described in this Section, one hundred percent (100%) of the  special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge(s) is owed and any balance  is due and payable.  f. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, “full development”  is considered to be sixty percent (60%) property coverage for multi‐family  development and eighty percent (80%) property coverage for commercial,  industrial, mixed use, and all other development. “Property coverage” is defined  as the portion of the property supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks,  parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm water  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  21  systems, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts  under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).  g. Developed Area: The “developed area” shall include, but not be  limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system  development charges have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings,  driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access  areas, storm water systems, and improvements required for mitigation of  environmental impacts.  h. Interpretation: The Administrator of Public Works shall make the  final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of system development  charges.   3. Segregation by Latecomer’s Agreement: Segregation, if If segregation  is permitted by the latecomer’s agreement, will it shall be governed by the terms  of the latecomer’s agreement. Subsections C1 and 2 of this Section shall govern  segregation insofar as they are not inconsistent with the latecomer’s agreement.  SECTION IX. Subsection 4‐1‐190.D.22 of subsection 4‐1‐190.D of the Renton Municipal  Code is amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐190.D remain in effect and  unchanged.  22. “Independent fee calculation” means the transportation impact fee  calculation, and/or economic documentation prepared by a feepayer, to support  the assessment of a transportation, parks or fire protection impact fee other than  by the use of the rates published in the City’s Fee Schedule, or the calculations  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  22  prepared by the department where none of the fee categories or fee amounts in  the City’s Fee Schedule accurately describe or capture the impacts of the  development activity on public facilities.  SECTION X. Subsection 4‐1‐190.F of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  F. IMPACT FEES METHODOLOGY AND APPLICABILITY:  The transportation and park impact fees in the City of Renton Fee Schedule  are generated from the formulae for calculating transportation impact fees set  forth in the applicable Rate Study. School and fire impact fees in the fee Fee  schedule Schedule are generated from the formulae for calculating impact fees  set forth in the applicable school and fire capital facilities plans as may be further  set forth in a Rate Study. Except as otherwise provided for independent fee  calculations in subsection H of this Section, exemptions in subsection I of this  Section, and credits in subsection J of this Section, all new development activity in  the City will be charged impact fees applicable to the type of development listed  in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  SECTION XI. Subsections 4‐1‐190.G.1 and 4‐1‐190.G.2 of the Renton Municipal Code  are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐190.G remain in effect and unchanged.  1. Transportation, Parks, and Fire Impact Fees:  a. Applicability: The City shall collect impact fees, based on the rates  in the City of Renton Fee Schedule, from any applicant seeking development  approval from the City for any development activity within the City, when such  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  23  development activity requires the issuance of a building permit or a permit for a  change in use, and creates a demand for additional public facilities.  b. Transportation and Parks Basis and Amount: Maximum allowable  impact fees for transportation and parks are established by the applicable Rate  Study. The rates to be charged by the City are listed in the City of Renton Fee  Schedule.  c. Fire Impact Fee Basis and Amount: The maximum allowable fees  shall be based on the fire capital facilities plan and the rate study developed by  the RRFA, approved by its Board, and adopted by the City as part of the capital  facilities element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and as a fire impact fee Rate  Study. The rates to be charged are listed in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  2. School Impact Fees:  a. Applicability: The City shall collect impact fees, based on the rates  in the City of Renton Fee Schedule, from all applicants seeking development  approval from the City for any residential development activity in that portion of  the City located within each respective school district’s boundaries.  b. Basis and Amount: The maximum allowable fees shall be based on  a school capital facilities plan developed by the appropriate school district and  approved by the School Board, and adopted by reference by the City as part of the  capital facilities element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The rates to be charged  are listed in the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  24  c. Adjustment by Council: The City Council may adjust the fees, as it  sees fit, to take into account local conditions such as, but not limited to, price  differentials throughout each respective school district in the cost of new housing,  school occupancy levels, and the percent of each school district’s capital facilities  budget, which will be expended locally.  d. Classification by Dwelling Type: Separate fees shall be calculated for  single family and multi‐family dwellings, and separate student generation rates  must be determined by each school district for each type of dwelling. For purposes  of this Section, mobile homes shall be treated as single family dwellings; duplexes  and accessory dwelling units shall be treated as multi‐family dwellings.  e. Credit for Tax Contributions: The formula in Attachment A to  Ordinance 4808 provides a credit for the anticipated tax contributions that would  be made by the development based on historical levels of voter support for bond  issues in a school district.  SECTION XII. Subsections 4‐1‐190.H.1, 4‐1‐190.H.2, and 4‐1‐190.H.4 of subsection 4‐1‐ 190.H of the Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐ 190.H remain in effect and unchanged.  H. INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATIONS:  1. Calculations by City: If, in the judgment of the Administrator, none of  the fee categories or fee amounts set forth in the City of Renton Fee Schedule  accurately describes or captures the impacts of a new development on public  facilities, the Department may conduct independent fee calculations and the  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  25  Administrator may impose alternative fees on a specific development based on  those calculations. The alternative fees and the calculations shall be set forth in  writing and shall be mailed to the feepayer.  2. Calculations by Feepayer: A feepayer may opt not to have the impact  fees determined according to the fee structure in the City of Renton Fee Schedule,  in which case the feepayer shall prepare and submit to the Administrator, the  RRFA, or school district, as applicable, an independent fee calculation for the  development activity for which a building permit is being sought. The  documentation submitted shall show the basis upon which the independent fee  calculation was made. An independent fee calculation shall use the same  methodology used to establish impact fees and for transportation, parks, fire, and  school impact fees; they shall be limited to adjustments in trip generation rates  and lengths for transportation impact fees, persons per dwelling unit for park  impact fees, and fire incident rates for fire impact fees.  3. Consideration and Review: There is a rebuttable presumption that the  calculations set forth in the Rate Studies and Capital Facilities Plans and the data  used by the City, RRFA, and school districts are valid.  a. Transportation and Parks Impact Fees: The Administrator shall  consider the documentation submitted by the feepayer, but is not required to  accept such documentation or analysis which the Administrator reasonably deems  to be inapplicable, inaccurate, incomplete, or unreliable. The Administrator may  require the feepayer to submit additional or different documentation for  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  26  consideration. The Administrator is authorized to adjust the impact fees on a case‐ by‐case basis based on the independent fee calculation, the specific  characteristics of the development, and/or principles of fairness. The fees or  alternative fees and the calculations therefor shall be set forth in writing and shall  be mailed to the feepayer.  b. School and Fire Impact Fees: A school district or the RRFA may  adjust the amount of the impact fee assessed if appropriate and lawful, as  demonstrated by the feepayer to the appropriate school district’s or the RRFA’s  satisfaction. If the Administrator receives a written decision from a school district  or RRFA approving an independent fee calculation, the Administrator shall apply  and collect school or fire impact fees, as applicable, as adjusted by the approved  independent fee calculation.  4. Adjustment from Maximum Amount: Alternative transportation  impact fees calculated pursuant to this subsection shall be reduced in the same  manner and to the same extent that the impact fees in the City of Renton Fee  Schedule are reduced from the maximum allowable impact fees in the Rate Study.  5. Appeals: Determinations made by the Administrator or school district  pursuant to this Section may be appealed to the office of the Hearing Examiner  under the procedures set forth in subsection L of this Section.  SECTION XIII. Section 4‐1‐200 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  4‐1‐200 EXTRA FEES:  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  27  Whenever any application is to be handled under the terms of any portion of the  City’s land use codes, adopted codes, or the International Building Code, and that  application is so large, complicated or technically complex that it cannot be  handled with existing City staff, then an additional fee can be charged which is  equivalent to the extra costs incurred by the City of Renton to pay:  A. Overtime costs,;  B. The pro rata costs of additional employees necessary to handle the  application;,  C. The costs expended to retain the qualified consultants to handle the  project,; and  D. Any general administrative costs when directly attributable to the project.  Such fees shall be charged only to the extent incurred beyond that normally  incurred for processing an application.   When the application or development plans are modified so as to require  additional review by the City beyond the review normally required for like  projects, at the discretion of the Community and Economic Development  Administrator, an additional fee may be charged at seventy five‐dollars ($75.00)  per hour.   SECTION XIV. Subsection 4‐1‐220.A of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  A. PURPOSE:  As provided for in chapter 84.14 RCW, the purpose of this Section is to provide  limited, eight (8), ten (10), or twelve (12) year exemptions from ad valorem  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  28  property taxation for qualified new multi‐family housing located in designated  residential targeted areas.  SECTION XV. Subsection 4‐1‐220.D.1 of subsection 4‐1‐220.D of the Renton Municipal  Code is amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐220.D remain in effect and  unchanged.  1. Location: The property shall be located in one of the designated  “residential targeted areas” listed below in subsection D1a or b of this Section  which are targeted for low‐ or moderate‐income housing serving households at or  below eighty percent (80%) of the median income. If a part of any legal lot is within  a residential targeted area, then the entire lot shall be deemed to lie within the  residential targeted area.  a. Sunset Area: In the Sunset Area and within the Center Village (CV),  Residential Multi‐Family (RMF), or the Residential‐14 (R‐14) Zone; or  b. Downtown: In the Downtown and within the Center Downtown (CD)  Zone or Residential‐14 (R‐14) Zone.  SECTION XVI. Subsection 4‐1‐230.C of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  C. TYPES OF SECURITY ACCEPTED FOR ALL OTHER PURPOSES:  The following security devices are acceptable for the purposes of deferral  requests, occupancy permit requests in advance of installation of required  landscaping or other improvements, critical areas mitigation performance, critical  areas monitoring/maintenance, and landscaping maintenance:  1. Cash;  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  29  2. Letter of credit;  3. Set aside letter; provided, that the funds cannot be withdrawn, spent,  or committed to any third party; or  4. Savings account assigned to the City and blocked as to withdrawal by  the secured party without the City’s approval.; or   5. Performance or maintenance bond exclusively for the purpose of  ensuring continued maintenance of on‐ or off‐site landscaping.   SECTION XVII. Subsections 4‐1‐240.B.1 and 4‐1‐240.B.2 of subsection 4‐1‐240.B of the  Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐240.B remain  in effect and unchanged.  B. PUBLIC TRAIL OR PARK IMPROVEMENTS OR FEE‐IN‐LIEU FOR COMMON  OPEN SPACE:  Improvements to public trails, public parks, or payment of a fee may occur  to reduce common open space requirements, if approval for such substitution is  accepted by the Community Services Administrator.  1. Public Trail Improvement in Lieu of Common Open Space: The  requirements for open space may be reduced where public trail improvements  are being provided. On‐site public trail improvements may occur as a substitute  to common open space requirements on a square footage basis, provided the trail  has been identified in the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan or the Parks,  Recreation, Open Space, and Natural Areas Resources Plan or an adopted  community plan. Trails shall be constructed by the developer to standards  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  30  specified by the Community Services Department and dedicated to and accepted  by the City of Renton as a public trail prior to final plat recording or short plat  recording, or building permit final occupancy for non‐subdivision projects.  2. Public Park Improvement in Lieu of Common Open Space: The  requirements for open space may be reduced where public park improvements  are being provided. On‐site public park improvements may occur as a substitution  to common open space requirements on a square footage basis provided the park  has been identified in the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Natural Resources  Areas Plan or an adopted community plan. The park shall be constructed by the  developer to standards specified by the Community Services Department and  dedicated to and accepted by the City of Renton as a public park prior to final plat  recording or short plat recording, or building permit final occupancy for non‐ subdivision projects.  3. Fee in Lieu of Common Open Space: A fee‐in‐lieu may occur as a  substitute to common open space requirements; provided, that an off‐site public  park is within one‐quarter (1/4) mile of the site proposed for development, safe  and easy pedestrian access is provided to such public park, and the public park  shall be an integral part of the design approach of the development.   a. Fee Calculation: The fee shall be the equivalent of the monetary  value of the required improvements for common open space plus the monetary  value of the land area required to be placed in common open space. The project  applicant shall provide the City with an estimate of the improvement value and an  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  31  appraisal for the value of the land for the identified intended use with utilities and  other non‐structural improvements. The total monetary value of the fee‐in‐lieu  shall be approved by the Community Services Department.  b. The fee shall be paid prior to final plat recording or final short plat  recording or building permit issuance for non‐subdivision projects.  SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4‐2‐020.J of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  J. RESIDENTIAL MULTI‐FAMILY (RMF):  The Residential Multi‐Family (RMF) Zone provides suitable environments for  multi‐family dwellings. It is further intended to conditionally allow uses that are  compatible with and support a multi‐family environment. The RMF allows for the  development of both infill parcels in existing multi‐family districts with compatible  projects and other multi‐family development. Densities range from ten (10) to  twenty (20) du/acre with opportunities for bonuses up to twenty‐five (25)  dwelling units per net acre.  SECTION XIX. Subsection 4‐2‐080.A.6, 4‐2‐080.A.16, and 4‐2‐080.A.28 of subsection 4‐2‐ 080.A of the Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐ 080.A remain in effect and unchanged.  6.    Specified residential use(s) are not allowed within one thousand feet  (1,000') of the centerline of Renton Municipal Airport runway. Attached dwellings  are not permitted in the CA or CN Zone within the Benson, Cedar River, Talbot, or  Valley Community Planning Areas.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  32      Where not prohibited, attached dwelling units are permitted subject to  the following conditions and standards in addition to RMC 4‐4‐150, Residential  Mixed‐ Use Development Standards:  a.    Standalone Residential – Where Allowed: Standalone residential  buildings are permitted:  i.    In the CD Zone outside of the Downtown Business District,  provided residential amenity space and/or lobby space is provided on the ground  floor along the street frontage;  ii.    In the CV Zone where not abutting NE Sunset Blvd. east of  Harrington Avenue NE;  iii.    In the CA Zone where abutting a residential zone if at least one  vertical mixed building is constructed along the street frontage(s) with a minimum  of two (2) residential stories above commercial, the standalone residential  building(s) are sited closest to the abutting residential zone and, if townhouses,  limited to three (3) stories;  iv.    In the UC Zone along streets not designated as pedestrian‐ oriented streets through the Master Site Plan process; and  v.    In the COR Zone as determined through the Master Site Plan  process.    Where standalone residential buildings are not allowed, dwelling  units shall be integrated into a vertically mixed use building with ground floor  commercial.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  33  b.    Commercial Uses: Commercial uses in residential mixed‐use  developments are limited to retail sales, on‐site services, eating and drinking  establishments, taverns, daycares, preschools, indoor recreational facilities, pet  daycares, craft distilleries/small wineries/micro‐breweries with tasting rooms,  general offices not located on the ground floor, and similar uses as determined by  the Administrator.      Uses normal and incidental to a building including, but not limited to,  interior entrance areas, elevators, waiting/lobby areas, mechanical rooms, mail  areas, garbage/recycling/compost storage areas, vehicle parking areas, and  areas/facilities for the exclusive use of the residents are not considered  commercial uses.  c. Timing of Development: A building permit shall not be issued for any  standalone residential building(s) prior to the issuance of a building permit for any  required standalone commercial or vertically mixed use building(s) and no  certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any standalone residential building(s)  prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any required standalone  commercial or vertically mixed use building(s).   16.    Attached dwelling units may be allowed through a Planned Urban  Development pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐150, Planned Urban Development  Regulations, and in conformance with the following:  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  34  a.    Mass Transit Facilities: At least fifty percent (50%) of the lot shall  be located within one‐quarter (1/4) mile (as the crow flies) of at least one of the  following:  i.    Bus Stop: An official bus service stop that offers levels of service  comparable to all of the following:  (a)    Service at least every ten (10) minutes during peak  morning and evening travel times;  (b)    Fifteen (15) minute service during off‐peak periods;  (c)     Scheduled service for late night/early mornings; or  (d)    Full service seven (7) days a week.  ii.    Dedicated Park and Ride: A Park and Ride, as defined in RMC  4‐11‐160, Definitions P.  iii.    Commuter Rail: A passenger rail station.  b.    Mixed Use Building: Dwelling units are allowed only within a  vertically mixed use building with ground floor commercial and a minimum of  eight (8) stories that is designed and developed pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐150,  Residential Mixed Use Development Standards. Commercial uses on the ground  floor shall be limited to retail sales, on‐site services, eating and drinking  establishments, taverns, daycares, preschools, indoor recreational facilities, pet  daycares, craft distilleries/small wineries/micro‐breweries with tasting rooms and  similar uses as determined by the Administrator.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  35  c.    Structured Parking: Required parking for the dwelling units shall  be provided entirely within an attached structured parking facility. If not provided  within a structured parking garage, surface parking lots serving commercial uses  shall be located to the rear and/or side of the building.  d.    Prohibited Locations: The lot shall not be located within one  thousand feet (1,000') of an adult retail or entertainment business located within  the City of Renton.   28.    Industrial engine and transmission rebuild uses shall be conducted  entirely indoors. In the CA Zone, body shops shall be conducted entirely indoors.  For all other uses and zones, an Administrative Conditional Use Permit is required  if operations are conducted outdoors.  SECTION XX. Subsection 4‐2‐100.B of section 4‐2‐100 of the Renton Municipal Code  is amended as shown below. All other provisions in section 4‐2‐100 remain in effect and  unchanged.  4‐2‐100 ZONING STANDARDS TABLES:  A. STANDARDS ESTABLISHED:  The following tables contain density, dimension standards, and other  limitations for the various zones. Additional development requirements found in  these tables not related to zoning will also apply.  B. TABLES:  There are four (4) separate tables dealing with the following general land use  categories and zones:  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  36  RESIDENTIAL (RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8, R‐10, R‐14, RMF)  RESIDENTIAL MULTI‐FAMILY (RMF) MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS  COMMERCIAL (CN, CV, CA, CD, CO, COR, UC)  INDUSTRIAL (IL, IM, IH)  C. INTERPRETATION OF TABLES:  Development standards are listed under each applicable heading and the  zones are listed at the left of each standard. The table cells contain the minimum  and, in some cases, maximum requirements of the zone. The small numbers  (superscript) in a cell indicate additional requirements or detailed information  which is not able to fit in the table format. A blank cell indicates there are no  specific requirements.  SECTION XXI. Subsection 4‐2‐110.E.4.a of subsection 4‐2‐110.E of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐110.E remain in effect  and unchanged.  4.    Allowed Projections into Setbacks:  a.    Fireplace Structures, Windows: Fireplace structures, bay or garden  windows, enclosed stair landings, and similar structures as determined by the  Community and Economic Development Zoning Administrator may project  twenty‐four inches (24") into any setback; provided, such projections are:  i.    Limited to two (2) per facade.  ii.    Not wider than ten feet (10').  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  37  b.    Fences, Rockeries, and Retaining Walls: See RMC 4‐4‐040, Fences,  Hedges, and Retaining Walls.  c.    Steps and Decks: Uncovered steps and decks not exceeding  eighteen inches (18") above the finished grade may project to any property line.  Uncovered steps and decks having no roof covering and not exceeding forty two  inches (42") high may be built within the front yard setback.  d.    Eaves: Eaves and cornices may project up to twenty four inches  (24") into any required setback.  e.    Porches and Stoops: May project into front setbacks up to eight  feet (8') and into side setbacks along a street up to five feet (5').  f.    Overhead Weather Protection: Roofs and awnings situated above  pedestrian entryways may extend up to five feet (5') into a required setback and  may extend no wider than three feet (3') on either side of the entryway.  g.    Accessibility Ramps: Ramps required for barrier free access, and  meeting all Building Code requirements including slope and handrails, may intrude  into required setbacks. This exemption will be limited to the extent necessary to  meet the Building Code requirements.  h.    Cisterns and Rain Barrels: Rain barrels, cisterns, and other  rainwater catchment systems may intrude into a required setback as follows:  i.    Elements are not permitted in the front setback.  ii.    Elements which are less than fiftyfour inches (54") above  finished grade and contain up to six hundred (600) gallons may intrude into a side  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  38  or rear setback a distance no greater than twenty percent (20%) of that setback,  but must maintain at least three feet (3') of undisturbed setback.  iii.    Elements which are greater than fiftyfour inches (54") above  finished grade or contain over six hundred (600) gallons shall not intrude upon  side and rear setback requirements.  i.    Arbor, Pergola or Trellis: Allowed in required yard setbacks if they  meet the following provisions:  i.    The length of any side shall not exceed twelve feet (12') and the  footprint shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet, inclusive of eaves;  ii.    A maximum height from finished grade to the top of the  structure of ten feet (10');  iii.    Both sides and roof shall be at least fifty percent (50%) open,  or, if latticework is used, there shall be a minimum opening of two inches (2")  between crosspieces.  iv.    Limited to two (2) such structures per lot.  j.    Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems: HVAC  Systems may extend into any side or rear yard setback.  SECTION XXII. The subsection title of 4‐2‐120.A in section 4‐2‐120 of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other titles shown, and provisions in, 4‐2‐120  remain in effect and unchanged.  4‐2‐120 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  39  4‐2‐120A    DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING  DESIGNATIONS (CN, CV, & CA, & UC)  4‐2‐120B    DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING  DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)  4‐2‐120C    CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS  TABLES FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS  4‐2‐120D    (Repealed by Ord. 5355, 2‐25‐2008)  4‐2‐120E    (Repealed by Ord. 5759, 6‐22‐2015)  4‐2‐120F    (Repealed by Ord. 5759, 6‐22‐2015)  SECTION XXIII. Subsection 4‐7‐060.D of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  D. FEES:  Shall be as stipulated in RMC 4‐1‐170. the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  SECTION XXIV. Section 4‐9‐010 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  4‐9‐010 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES:  It is the intention of the City Council that provisions of State law governing  annexations as set forth in chapter 35A.14 RCW as it presently exists or as it may  be amended shall control and that this section shall be supplemental thereto.  Upon filing a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings with the City  Clerk, as referenced in RMC 4‐8‐120D, the submitting party shall simultaneously  pay an annexation processing fee in the amount stipulated in the City of Renton  Fee Schedule RMC 4‐1‐170A to compensate the City for administrative cost and  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  40  expense in the processing, checking and handling of such annexation request,  which fee shall likewise include the publication and posting expense of any notice  pertaining to the annexation.  SECTION XXV. Subsection 4‐9‐020.D.2 of subsection 4‐9‐020.D of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐9‐020.D remain in effect  and unchanged.  D. APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:  1. The application and submittal requirements for amendments initiated  by private parties are listed in RMC 4‐8‐120C, Land Use Applications. City‐initiated  amendments are exempt from formal application.  2. The fee for amendments initiated by private parties is listed in RMC 4‐1‐ 170, Land Use Review Fees the City of Renton Fee Schedule. City‐initiated  amendments will not be assessed a fee.  3. Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments shall not be accepted  in the following circumstances, unless the amendment involves the correction of  a technical error:  a. Applications which were submitted for amendment in the previous  Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle that were denied;  b. Applications for amendment of the Comprehensive Plan land use  map involving properties considered for amendment in the previous  Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle;  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  41  c. Applications for amendment involving properties located within a  community planning area in which the community planning process has been  initiated; or, where a community plan has been adopted within the two (2) years  prior to the amendment cycle.  SECTION XXVI. Subsection 4‐9‐025.D.2 of subsection 4‐9‐025.D of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐9‐025.D remain in effect  and unchanged.   D. REVIEW PROCESS FOR TITLE IV AMENDMENTS:*  1. Applications for Title IV amendments may be accepted at any time and  placed on the Title IV docket. Imperative Title IV amendments designated by the  Mayor, City Council, or Planning Commission may be given higher priority and  processed outside the annual Title IV process outlined in this section.  2. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall keep  a docket of suggested Title IV amendments that includes the following:  a. Name and address of the person or agency requesting the  amendment;  b. Description of the amendment;  c. Date of the request; and  d. Map of the affected area, if appropriate.  3. The Council may review the Title IV docket to determine which  applications to include in the Planning Commission’s annual work program.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  42  4. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall  conduct its review of Title IV concurrently with Planning Commission review.  However, all departmental reporting and evaluation, including necessary  environmental review, shall be completed prior to the Planning Commission  making recommendations on the amendments.  5. The Planning Commission shall forward a recommendation to the City  Council after a public hearing.  6. Title IV amendments shall be adopted by ordinance of the City Council  after review by the City Council.  * Code reviser’s note: Ord. 5882, which amended this subsection, was  repealed by Ord. 5887. At the City’s request, the text of this subsection was  restored to that which preceded the adoption of Ord. 5882.  SECTION XXVII. Subsections 4‐9‐090.F.1, 4‐9‐090.F.2, and 4‐9‐090.F.3 of the Renton  Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐9‐090.F remain in effect  and unchanged.  F. APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES:  The following conditions must be met to obtain a business license for all home  occupations:   1. Business License Application: Submission of a complete application to  the Administrative Services Department for a business license. That Department  shall refer the application to the Zoning Community and Economic Development  Administrator for review of the proposed use under this Code Section.   AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  43  a. Business License Development Services Division Application for  Home Occupation: If the proposed home occupation will have customer visits,  more than six (6) business‐related deliveries per week, or any external indication  of commercial activity, then additional information is required from the applicant  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐120, Submittal Requirements – Specific to Application Type.   2. Compliance: Compliance with all conditions placed on the home  occupation by the Zoning Community and Economic Development Administrator  to satisfy the general purpose of this Section. In addition to the provisions set forth  herein, the Zoning Community and Economic Development Administrator may, in  approving, conditioning or denying the application, consider the cumulative  impacts of the proposed home occupation in relation to other City‐approved  home occupations in the immediate vicinity.   3. Decision: If the Zoning Community and Economic Development  Administrator approves the home occupation section of the business license  application, the Administrative Services Department may issue the license  provided that all other requirements have been met.   4. Qualification Standards:  a. Primary Residence: The property on which the business is located  must be the primary residence of the business owner.   b. Retail Sales and Storage: No retail sales shall be allowed, except for  sales of products made on the premises. Incidental supplies necessary for business  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  44  operations may be kept if not for sale. Products may be sold wholesale and stored  for wholesale distribution.   c. Parking: There shall be no expansion of parking, including the  addition of on‐site or off‐site parking spaces, to support the home occupation.   d. Employees: The home occupation shall not employ more than one  nonresident of the dwelling unit. An employee for these purposes means one  individual, not a full‐time equivalent. In addition, home occupations may use  professional services such as accountants.   e. Mechanical/Electrical Equipment: There shall be no use of  mechanical or electrical equipment that would change the structure or create  visible or audible interference in radio or television receivers or cause fluctuations  in line voltage outside the dwelling unit.   f. Environmental Impacts: There shall be no noise, vibration, smoke,  gas, dust, odor, heat or glare produced by the business which would exceed that  normally associated with a dwelling.   g. Space: The business shall not occupy more than twenty five percent  (25%) of the floor space of the gross floor area of the residence, and in no event,  more than five hundred (500) square feet.   h. Outdoor Storage: The outdoor storage or display of materials,  goods, products or equipment is prohibited. Domestic animals or household pets  kept as an accessory use and utilized as a component of a home occupation are  excluded from this provision.   AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  45  i. Flammable Liquids: A permit must be obtained for storage, handling  or use of Class I flammable or combustible liquids on the premises.   j. Fire Extinguisher: A minimum rated 2‐A 10 BC fire extinguisher is  required on the premises.   k. City Codes: The home occupation must meet all City codes and  ordinances for type of business being conducted.   l. Building Alterations: Any alterations to the building shall be  conducted pursuant to the issuance of a permit from the Planning/Building/Public  Works Community and Economic Development Department.   m. Accessory Structures: Existing garages with adequate access may  be used for home occupations; provided, that the property still complies with the  parking requirements of the zone. Other accessory structures, such as carports  and tool sheds, shall not be used for any activities associated with the business  other than storage. Such storage shall be completely enclosed and not be visible  from outside the accessory structure. Accessory structures providing shelter for  domestic animals or household pets that are a component of the home  occupation are allowed.   n. Signage: There shall be no exterior or window signage, display, or  advertising except for one nonelectric and nonilluminated sign attached flush to  the wall or window of the building with the face of the sign in a plane parallel to  the plane of the wall or window. The allowed building sign may not be larger than  two (2) square feet in area. The sign material and appearance must be harmonious  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  46  with the architecture of the home. Pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐100B6q, a permit is not  required for the allowed building sign.   SECTION XXVIII. Subsection 4‐9‐140.C of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  C. PROCESSING FEE:  Fees for processing any application by any owner in pursuance of  chapter 84.34 RCW, (Open Space, Agricultural and Timber Lands – Current Use  Assessment Conservation Futures) , shall be as listed in RMC 4‐1‐170Athe City of  Renton Fee Schedule, which fee is payable to the City of Renton upon filing of the  application by any such owner and said fee shall be delivered by the King County  Assessor to the City of Renton upon referral of any such application to the  legislative body of the City. Such fee shall be deposited in the general fund of the  City of Renton.  SECTION XXIX. Subsections 4‐9‐150.F.2 and 4‐9‐150.F.4 of subsection 4‐9‐150.F are  amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐9‐150.F remain in effect and unchanged.  F. PROCEDURE FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PLANNED URBAN  DEVELOPMENTS:  The approval of a planned urban development shall be by the Hearing  Examiner, upon recommendation from the City Staff, and shall be processed in  accordance with the following procedures:  1. Permit Process: Planned urban developments shall be processed  consistent with chapter 4‐8 RMC as Type II or III permits as specified.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  47  2. Filing of Application: The application for preliminary approval of a  planned urban development shall be filed with the Department of Community and  Economic Development accompanied by a filing fee as established by RMC 4‐1‐ 170, Land Use Review Fees the City of Renton Fee Schedule (“Fee Schedule”).  Wherever a planned urban development is intended to be subdivided into smaller  parcels, an application for preliminary plat approval may be submitted together  with the application for final planned urban development approval. In such case,  the preliminary plat and the final planned urban development shall be processed  and reviewed concurrently. Subsequent to final planned urban development  approval, a planned urban development may also be subdivided by the binding  site plan process.  3. Informal Review: Applicant must submit a conceptual plan for  preapplication review, prior to submission of an application for preliminary  approval.  4. Submittal Requirements and Application Fees: A preliminary  development plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and  Economic Development and shall include the general intent of the development,  apportionment of land for buildings and land use, proposed phases, if any, and  such other information or documentation which the Department of Community  and Economic Development shall require. Submittal requirements and fees shall  be as listed in RMC 4‐1‐170, Land Use Review Fees, and RMC 4‐8‐120C, Land Use  Applications, and the Fee Schedule.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  48  5. Public Notice and Comment Period: See RMC 4‐8‐090, Public Notice  Requirements.   6. Phasing: Planned urban developments may be proposed to be  developed in one or more phases. If developed in phases, each phase of the  planned urban development shall contain adequate parking, open space,  recreation space, public benefits, landscaping, buffering, circulation, utilities and  other improvements necessary so that each phase, together with any earlier  phases, may stand alone and satisfy the purposes of this Section. Further, each  phase must meet the requirements of subsection D2 of this Section, Public Benefit  Required, unless the public benefits have been met by previously approved  phases.   7. Review Process: The preliminary plan shall be circulated to all reviewing  departments for comments. The Department of Community and Economic  Development shall evaluate whether the plans comply with the development  policies of the Renton Comprehensive Plan and this Section and shall make a  recommendation to the Hearing Examiner accordingly.   8. Decision:   a. Preliminary Planned Urban Development – New Development:  After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions,  or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall contain an accurate  description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units of the planned urban  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  49  development, and any phases thereof, as well as the effective date of approval  and the date of expiration of such approval.  b. Preliminary Planned Urban Development – Existing Development  with Binding Site Plan: After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve,  approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall  contain an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units  of the planned urban development, and any phases thereof, as well as the  effective date of approval and the date of expiration of such approval, on its face  prior to recording with King County.  9. Effect of an Approved Preliminary Plan: The approval of a preliminary  plan constitutes the City’s acceptance of the general project, including its density,  intensity, arrangement and design. Approval authorizes the applicant or  subsequent owner to apply for final plan approval of the planned urban  development or phase(s) thereof. Preliminary plan approval does not authorize  any building permits or any site work without appropriate permits. An approved  preliminary plan binds the future planned urban development site and all  subsequent owners to the uses, densities, and standards of the preliminary plan  until such time as a final plan is approved for the entire site or all phases of the  site, or a new preliminary plan is approved, or the preliminary plan is abandoned  in writing or expires subject to the provisions of subsections G and K of this  Section.  10. Zoning Map Revised:   AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  50  a. New Planned Urban Development Approval: Upon approval of a  preliminary planned urban development, the City shall place the planned urban  development land use file number as an overlay on the subject property on the  City of Renton’s COR Maps, the City’s online interactive mapping application  available through the City’s website City of Renton Zoning Map.   b. Demonstration Ordinances: Ordinances 4468 and 4550, which  created demonstration developments known as Village on Union and certain  divisions of the Orchards, are hereby considered final planned urban  developments for the purposes of code implementation.   SECTION XXX. Subsection 4‐9‐180.E of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  E. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES:  Submittal requirements and fees shall be as specified in RMC 4‐1‐170, Land  Use Review Fees, and 4‐8‐120C, Land Use Applications, and the City of Renton Fee  Schedule.  SECTION XXXI. Subsection 4‐9‐220.C of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  C. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES:  Shall be as listed in RMC 4‐8‐120C, Land Use Applications, and 4‐1‐170, Land  Use Review Fees the City of Renton Fee Schedule.  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  51  SECTION XXXII. Subsections 9‐16‐4.D and 9‐16‐4.E of section 9‐16‐4 of the Renton  Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 9‐16‐4 remain in effect and  unchanged.  9‐16‐4 PRELIMINARY NOTICE:  A.    Notification of potentially benefiting property owners must occur before  construction.  B.    A benefiting property owner is a property owner who would have been  responsible for all or part of certain improvements in the normal course of  development or utilization of their parcel, who subsequently connect to or in any  way utilize improvements already installed by the City.  C.    The City will notify all the potential benefiting property owners that the  proposed installation of City installed improvements may well affect their  property. The City Clerk shall mail a notice to all owners of record of property  within the special assessment district boundary. The notice shall include a general  range of the preliminary per unit assessment, the proposed special assessment  district boundary map and the description of the property owners’ rights and  options to participate in the special assessment district.  D.    The property owners, upon payment of the required fee of a seventy five  dollar ($75.00) fee for appeal of an administrative decision, in accordance with  RMC 4‐1‐170, Land Use Review Fees the City of Renton Fee Schedule (“Fee  Schedule”), as now or hereafter amended, may request an appeal hearing before  the City Council within twenty (20) days of the mailing. Appeals must adhere to  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  52  the criteria established under Section 9‐16‐8.C of this Chapter, but will be limited  to the question of whether or not a specific property should be included within  the special assessment district.  E.    The City will use its data for current taxpayer of record as a basis for  notifying property owners. The city City will prepare the mailing labels and assume  the costs for mailing the notices. The City will provide an “affidavit of mailing,”  attesting that all potential benefiting property owners have been notified.      This notice form will not be recorded with King County.   SECTION XXXIII. The definition of “Aquifer Protection Area (APA)” in section 4‐11‐010 of  the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other definitions in 4‐11‐010 remain  in effect and unchanged.  AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA): Shall be the portion of an aquifer within the  zone of capture and recharge area for a well or well field owned or operated by  the City, as defined in RMC 4‐3‐050B, Applicability, and as identified in the City of  Renton’s COR Maps, the City’s online interactive mapping application available  through the City’s website. The term shall be synonymous with “wellhead  protection area.”  SECTION XXXIV. Subsection 9‐16‐8.C of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  C.    Appeal:  1.    Within twenty (20) days of the date of the mailing, any property owner  may submit an appeal in writing to the City Council, c/o City Clerk. An appeal must  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  53  include a statement of claimed errors concerning the proposed assessment, and  must be accompanied by a seventy five dollar ($75.00) the fee for appeal of  administrative decision in accordance with RMC 4‐1‐170, Land Use Review Fees  the Fee Schedule, as now or hereafter amended. Errors which are not set forth in  writing and which do not adhere to the above criteria will not be considered.  2.    Objection by a benefiting property owner to the recording of a  potential assessment against their property does not constitute a valid appeal.  3.    Errors identified in an appeal must be related to cost, methodology for  cost distribution, and benefit to the property.  a.    Cost: If the benefiting property owner contests these costs, they  must provide a basis for their claimed discrepancy. (Estimate from contractor or  other reliable sources.)  b.    Costs Methodology: If the benefiting property owner contests the  cost methodology used, they have to show why it is not equitable and provide  their suggested alternate method of assessment and the justification for its use in  place of the staff recommended method.  c.    Benefit: If the benefiting property owner contests benefits, they  must provide a statement or documentation on why a particular parcel has no  future potential benefit.  4.    Upon receipt of an appeal and the required fee, the City Clerk shall  transmit the appeal and the official file to the Hearing Examiner for consideration  at a public hearing. The City Council may delegate to the Hearing Examiner the  AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  54  duty to hold the requisite public hearing, establish the record, and provide a  written report containing a recommendation to the City Council. Following the  public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall issue a written recommendation which  is mailed to parties of record. Any party of record may request reconsideration  within fourteen (14) days of the issuance of the Hearing Examiner’s report.  Following expiration of the reconsideration period, the Hearing Examiner shall  submit his written recommendation to the City Council on the Council meeting  agenda for concurrence. The City Council shall concur with, alter or deny the  Hearing Examiner’s recommendation.  SECTION XXXV. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION XXXVI. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after  publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall  consist of this ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    AGENDA ITEM # a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  55  APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2119:10/15/2020  AGENDA ITEM # a)