Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda Packet CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, December 7, 2020 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councilmembers are attending this meeting remotely through Zoom. Public testimony during public hearings and audience comments will be accommodated through Zoom, but the public is requested to sign up for such testimony by emailing cityclerk@rentonwa.gov or jmedzegian@rentonwa.gov. For those wishing to attend by Zoom, please (1) click this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87006639675 (or copy the URL and paste into a web browser) or (2) call-in to the Zoom meeting by dialing 253-215-8782 and entering 870 0663 9675, or (3) email one of the above email addresses or call 425-430-6501 by 10 a.m. on the day of the meeting to request an invite with a link to the meeting. Those testifying or providing audience comment will be limited to 5 minutes each speaker unless an exception is granted by the Council. Attendees will be muted and not audible to the Council except during times they are designated to speak. Advance instructions for how to address the Council will be provided to those who sign up in advance to speak and again during the meeting. The proceedings will also be available to view live on Renton’s Channel 21, and streaming live at http://rentonwa.gov/streaming 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION a) Mental Health Awareness Month - December 2020 4. PUBLIC HEARING a) Emergency ORD – Interim Zoning Controls – Extend and Amend Economic Recovery Revocable Permits and Signs 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of November 23, 2020. Council Concur b) AB - 2772 Administrative Services Department requests approval to write-off bad debt in the total amount of $36,222.87 per Policy & Procedure 220-03. Refer to Finance Committee c) AB - 2771 Community & Economic Development Department recommends adoption of an ordinance to amend and extend emergency Ordinance No. 5979 for six (6) additional months to advance economic recovery for businesses in Renton by providing updates to the no-fee Economic Recovery Revocable Right-of-Way Permit, waiving land use requirements for temporary business expansions in adjacent vacant storefronts, establishing short-term curbside pick-up stalls in the Center Downtown zone, and waiving fees in the Downtown Parking Garage for up to ten (10) hours until Phase 4 of the Safe Start Plan, or June 7, 2021, whichever occurs first. Council Concur d) AB - 2766 Community & Economic Development Department recommends further consideration and first reading of an emergency ordinance adopting interim zoning controls to amend Renton Municipal Code regarding "homeless services uses" (including "COVID-19 deinstensification shelters") and related code amendments; and to schedule second reading of the ordinance with any additional requested changes for December 14, 2020. Council Concur e) AB - 2770 Community Services Department recommends approval of the Agreement for Design, Permitting and Construction Support for Cedar River Trail Relocation and Cedar River Bank Stabilization Project, with GeoEngineers, Inc., in the amount of $375,638. This project is eligible for reimbursement from FEMA, reducing the City's actual cost to approximately $45,077. Refer to Finance Committee f) AB - 2773 Executive Department recommends approval of a Professional Services contract with Outcomes by Levy, LLC, in the amount of $166,000 per year for lobbying services for 2021 and 2022. Refer to Finance Committee g) AB - 2768 Public Works Administration recommends approval of Amendment No. 06-20 to LAG-93-004, lease with BHC, Inc., extending the lease to December 31, 2024 and increasing annual lease revenue to $33,998.62 due to a CPI adjustment, for 48,777.51 square foot parcel at the Renton Municipal Airport. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee h) AB - 2769 Public Works Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 to CAG-19-313, with Otak, Inc., in the amount of $558,917 for phase two design services for the Monroe Ave NE Storm Improvement project. Refer to Utilities Committee i) AB - 2759 Public Works Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-139, with Osborn Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $128,582 for additional design services for the SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure project. Refer to Utilities Committee 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Finance Committee: Vouchers, Renewal of City’s Liability Insurance, Arborist Prof. Svcs Agreement b) Transportation Committee: Bronson Way Street Vacation Compensation* 9. LEGISLATION Ordinances for first reading: a) Ordinance No. 5996: Emergency Ordinance Interim Zoning Controls - Homeless Shelters (See Item 7.d) b) Ordinance No. 5998: #D-176 Self-Service Storage in Commercial Zones (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) c) Ordinance No. 5999: #D-178 Standalone Solar Structures (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) d) Ordinance No. 6000: #D-179 CD Zone Changes (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) e) Ordinance No. 6001: #D-180 Vesting Regulations (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) f) Ordinance No. 6002: #D-181 Accessory Dwelling Unit (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) g) Ordinance No. 6003: #D-182 SEPA Appeal Process (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) h) Ordinance No. 6004: #D-183 Other Government Uses (Docket 15, Group B) (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) i) Ordinance No. 6005: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) j) Ordinance No. 6006: 19-M-01 900 Lind Ave Rezone (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) k) Ordinance No. 6007: 19-M-02 Zoning and Land Use Reconciliation (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) l) Ordinance No. 6008: 19-M-03 Benson, Upland Group Rezone (Approved via 10/12/2020 P&D Committee Report) m) Ordinance No. 6009: 1300 Bronson Way Street Vacation (VAC-20-001) )(See Item 8.b) Ordinance for first and advancement to second and final reading: n) Ordinance No. 5997: Emergency Ordinance Extending and Amending Interim Zoning Controls Economic Recovery (See Item 4.a) Ordinance for second and final reading: o) Ordinance No. 5995: 2020 Year-end Budget Ordinance (First Reading 11/23/2020) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 5:00 p.m. - 7th Floor -MEETING REMOTELY Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings ArmondoPavoneMayorWftereas,mentalhealthispartofoverallhealth,andoneinfiveadultsexperiencesamentalhealthprobleminanygivenyear;and‘Whereas,approximatelyone-halfofchronicmentalillnessbeginsbytheageof14andthree-quartetsbyage24;andWhereas,suicideisthe10thleadingcauseofdeathintheUnitedStatesandthe2ndleadingcauseamongyoungadults,and90%ofpeoplewhodiebysuicidehadshownsymptomsofamentalhealthcondition,accordingtointerviewswithfamily,friendsandmedicalprofessionals;andWhereas,longdelays—sometimesdecades—oftenoccurbetweenthetimesymptomsfirstappearandwhenindividualsgethelp;and‘14”hereas,earlyidentificationandtreatmentcanmakeadifferenceinsuccessfulmanagementofmentalillnessandrecovery;and‘T4lhereas,itisimportanttomaintainmentalhealthandlearnthesymptomsofmentalillnessinordertogethelpwhenitisneeded;andWfiereas,everypersonandcommunitycanmakeadifferenceinhelpingendthesilenceandstigmathatfortoolonghassurroundedmentalillnessanddiscouragedpeoplefromgettinghelp;andWhereas,publiceducationandcivicactivitiescanencouragementalhealthandhelpimprovethelivesofindividualsandfamiliesaffectedbymentalillness;Wow,therefore,I,ArmondoPavone,MayoroftheCityofRenton,doherebyproclaimDecember2020tobeAwarenessvtontfiintheCityofRenton,andIencourageallmembersofthecommunitytofightthestigmaofandprovidesupportformentalillness.InwitnesswhereofIhavehereuntosetmyhandandcausedthesealoftheCityofRentontobeaffixedthis7thdayofDecember,2020.AndoPavone,MayorCitRenton,WashingtonProctamationRentonCityHall,7thFloor1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.govAGENDA ITEM #3. a) PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTERIM ZONING CONTROL: AMENDING AND EXTENDING INTERIM ZONING CONTROLS FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY Renton City Council December 7, 2020 Presented by: Brittany Gillia, Assistant Planner 425-430-7246 bgillia@rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BACKGROUND Emergency Ordinance 5974 was adopted on July 13, 2020 Established interim zoning control to temporarily allow: •“Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits”; and •“Economic Recovery Signs”. Ord. 5974 will sunset on December 31, 2020 “Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits” will be in effect until the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start Plan or December 31, 2020, whichever occurs first AGENDA ITEM #4. a) PROPOSED EXTENSIONS Emergency Ordinance 5974 was adopted on July 13, 2020 Established interim zoning control to temporarily allow: •“Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits”; and •“Economic Recovery Signs”. Interim zoning controls are proposed to be extended until June 7, 2021 “Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits” are proposed to be extended until the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start Plan or June 7, 2021, whichever occurs first “Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits” that were issued as part of Ord. 5974 and remain valid by December 7, 2020 are proposed to be extended to coincide with the new expiration period AGENDA ITEM #4. a) PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Additions to the interim zoning controls include: A statement that parklets that are “pre-fabricated and engineered” as well as parklets without structural components are within the scope of Economic Recovery Revocable Right-of-Way Permits Required Temporary Use Permits for businesses who wish to temporarily expand their operations into an adjacent tenant space are proposed to be waived A limited number of short-term parking stalls are proposed to be established for curbside pick-up or to go orders within the Center Downtown (CD) zone City Center Parking Garage fees are proposed to be waived for parking periods up to 10 hours AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BACKGROUND The ordinance states: The ongoing presence of the COVID-19 pandemic that is affecting businesses; and The continued need for economic recovery mitigation measures to assist businesses; and Encouragement of parklets and prefabricated outdoor spaces as an approach to furthering economic recovery; and Increasing the availability of public parking stalls within the CD zone may assist the struggling Downtown business community AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BUSINESS EXPANSIONS Businesses that would like to have outdoor operations: Any business in Renton city limits that wishes to expand their dining or retail space outdoors may apply for an “Economic Recovery Right-of- Way Use Permit”AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BUSINESS EXPANSIONS Economic Recovery Right-of-Way Use Permits: Allow business expansions onto adjacent right-of-way or into private parking lots Needed for parklets, tents and sidewalk cafes Space must be kept clean and maintain a 4’ clear walkway All elements of the expansion must be temporary AGENDA ITEM #4. a) BUSINESS EXPANSIONS-PROPOSED AMENDMENT Expansion into adjacent tenant space: Applicable building permits must still be obtained for the Tenant Improvement Staff proposes to waive the planning requirement of a Temporary Use Permit that would otherwise be needed AGENDA ITEM #4. a) PARKLET EXAMPLES Non-Structural Pre-Engineered Sydney, Australia by Michael Chen, Mackenzie AGENDA ITEM #4. a) OTHER EXAMPLES Tents Additional permits may be needed Sidewalk Cafés Outdoor expansion markers available at City Hall AGENDA ITEM #4. a) DOWNTOWN PARKING Parking is sought after in the Civic Core: Many businesses have shifted to curbside pick-up Simultaneous construction projects along Wells Ave S, Williams Ave S, S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. Downtown communities have expressed a need for more public parking spaces AGENDA ITEM #4. a) DOWNTOWN PARKING-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Proposal to establish a limited number of short-term parking stalls within the Center Downtown (CD) zone City Center Parking Garage fees are proposed to be waived for parking periods up to 10 hours S 2nd St. and Logan Ave S AGENDA ITEM #4. a) Staff Contact: Brittany Gillia, Assistant Planner 425-430-7246 bgillia@rentonwa.gov NEXT STEPS Tonight:Accept public testimony regarding the proposed interim zoning controls, with first and second reading, to be effective immediately upon adoption June 7, 2021: Ordinance sunsets and all Economic Recovery business expansions and signage must be removed Contact Brittany Gillia at bgillia@rentonwa.gov or via the Business Assistance Hotline at (206)503-1742 to schedule a 30-minute planning session for permit applications AGENDA ITEM #4. a) Staff Contact: Brittany Gillia, Assistant Planner 425-430-7246 bgillia@rentonwa.gov QUESTIONS? Vancouver, WA Olympia, WA Redmond, WA Bothell, WA Walla Walla, WA AGENDA ITEM #4. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES    CITY OF RENTON  MINUTES ‐ City Council Regular Meeting  7:00 PM ‐ Monday, November 23, 2020  Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way    CALL TO ORDER     Mayor Pavone called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM.    ROLL CALL    Councilmembers Present:  Ruth Pérez, Council President  Randy Corman, Council Position No. 1  Angelina Benedetti, Council Position No. 2   Valerie O'Halloran, Council Position No. 3  Ryan McIrvin, Council Position No. 4  Ed Prince, Council Position No. 5  Kim‐Khánh Vǎn, Council Position No. 7  (All councilmembers attended remotely)   Councilmembers Absent:                             ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT     Armondo Pavone, Mayor  Alex Tuttle, Assistant City Attorney   Jason Seth, City Clerk  Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison  Kristi Rowland, Organizational Development Manager  Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator  Chip Vincent, Community & Economic Development Administrator  Martin Pastucha, Public Works Administrator  Ellen Bradley‐Mak, Human Resources and Risk Management Administrator  Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator  Cliff Long, Economic Development Director  Ron Straka, Utility Systems Director  Paul Hintz, Senior Planner  Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager  Ian Gray, Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  Chief Ed VanValey, Police Department Administrator  Melissa Day, Administrative Assistant – Police Department  Commander Tracy Wilkinson, Police Department  (All City staff attended remotely except City Clerk Seth)      PUBLIC HEARING   a) Emergency ORD – Interim Zoning Controls ‐ Homeless Shelters: This being the date set, and  proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws,  Mayor Pavone opened the public hearing to consider updating the Renton Municipal Code  (RMC) with an emergency ordinance regarding Interim Zoning Controls for homeless shelters.    Senior Planner Paul Hintz introduced himself to Council and noted his contact information for  the public. He reported that staff is recommending adoption of an emergency ordinance to:  1) Clarify Renton Municipal Code (RMC) land use definitions, and remove one land use;  2) Clarify and correct text related to Title IV’s unclassified use interpretation process, the  distinctions between “principal” and “accessory” uses, and staff titles;  3) Allow a single COVID‐19 De‐intensification Shelter for a limited term; and   4) Add the following land uses along with approval criteria/standards, and zoning  locational and scale limitations: “extended‐stay hotel” and “homeless services use.”    Mr. Hintz reviewed background information on this matter including the World Health  Organization’s announcement of the novel coronavirus (COVID‐19) global pandemic, King  County’s Local Health Officer authorizing King County to use only “legally available” resources  to “de‐intensify or reduce the density of existing homelessness shelters and encampments” in  response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, and that on or about April 9, 2020, in coordination with  King County and under King County’s lease with the Red Lion Hotel and Convention Center  (located at 1 S Grady Way), the Downtown Emergency Service Center (DESC) began using the  Red Lion Site as a COVID‐19 de‐intensification shelter for persons experiencing homelessness.    Mr. Hintz reported that city staff immediately made the following land use and zoning  determinations regarding the COVID‐19 shelter:  1) A “Hotel” is the only lawfully established land use on the Red Lion Site;  2) The COVID‐19 Shelter does not meet the RMC’s definition of a “Hotel”;  3) A “de‐intensification shelter” is not a recognized land use in RMC; and   4) A “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” or “congregate residence” are  the only land use most similar to the COVID‐19 Shelter and neither of those land uses  are allowed within the Red Lion Site’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zone.     Continuing to review the matter’s background information, Mr. Hintz noted that attempts to  negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with King County for an agreed upon date  to terminate use of the Red Lion Site ended without commitment, subsequent to the MOU  negotiations dissolving, the City issued a two‐count Finding of Violation (FOV) for 1) land use  not allowed in zoning designation, and 2) operating without a City of Renton business license,  and King County and Red Lion Site owners both requested a hearing before the City’s Hearing  Examiner to challenge the FOV which was held on August 14, 2020, with DESC also  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  participating in the hearing. (King County, DESC, and the Red Lion Site ownership are referred  to as the “shelter operators”).     Mr. Hintz also reported that a paraphrased argument from the shelter operators is that the  COVID‐19 Shelter is a hotel, and the City’s paraphrased argument is 1) the COVID‐19 Shelter  does not meet the definition of a “hotel” land use, 2) the COVID‐19 Shelter’s operations  appeared to most closely align with the RMC definitions for the “diversion facility / diversion  interim service facility” land use or the “congregate residence” land use, and 3) neither the  “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” land use nor the “congregate residence”  land use is allowed within the CA zone (which is the Red Lion Site’s zoning designation).    Mr. Hintz also reported that the Hearing Examiner issued written decisions on the matter on  August 31, 2020 and October 2, 2020 and directed the shelter operators to either cease the  current use of the Red Lion Site within 60 days or to apply to the City for an “unclassified use”  interpretation. He noted that the Hearing Examiner opined that City staff will likely determine  that the outcome of the unclassified use interpretation may be to deem the COVID‐19 Shelter  a “Hotel” land use, a “Social Service Organizations” land use, or a combination of the two. Mr.  Hintz pointed out that the Hearing Examiner’s decision also noted in part that “The most  compelling reason to disagree with the City’s 30‐day interpretation (regarding Hotel uses) is  simply that the Renton City Council didn’t expressly adopt a 30‐day limit for hotel stays,” and  regarding the “social services organizations” land use, the Hearing Examiner’s decision states  in part “There is the argument to be made that added overnight shelter use (to a “social  services organizations” use which only expressly allows “day shelter” use) could reduce the  impacts of a day shelter and thereby make a conditional use permit unnecessary. If the  Council considered an overnight shelter a more benign use than a day shelter, it would have  expressly authorized it as a permitted use elsewhere in the use table.”     Concluding, Mr. Hintz reported the staff recommendations for Council action:  1) Clarify RMC land use definitions, and remove one land use:  a. Social Services Organization  i. Define as: “Public or nonprofit agencies that provide counseling,  therapy, job training, educational classes, food banks, clothing banks,  or other social or human services to persons needing such services  but do not provide crisis intervention, day or overnight shelter, or  case management.”  1. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval in R‐ 14, Residential Multi‐Family (RMF), industrial zones,  Commercial Neighborhood (CN), Center Village (CV),  Commercial Arterial (CA), Commercial Downtown (CD),  Commercial Office (CO), and Commercial Office Residential  (COR) zones (no change recommended).  b. Hotel:  i. Define as: “A building or portion thereof wherein a majority of the  net floor area is dedicated for the rental of rooms for transient  occupancy for sleeping purposes in exchange for payment, and  typically based on a per night and per room basis for no more than 30  days. For the purposes of this definition, “transient” means less than  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  one month, or less than 30 continuous days if the rental period does  not begin on the first day of the month. Hotel structures are at least  two stories in height, with lodging space above the first floor. Lodging  space may also be located on the first floor. Individual rooms are  accessed from a common hallway and include permanent provisions  for sanitation but do not include kitchen facilities. A commercial  kitchen and dining room catering to the hotel patrons may be  provided, event space, eating and drinking establishments, and  accessory shops and services typically located in or provided by hotels  and catering to the general public may be provided.”   1. Permitted outright in all industrial zones west of Rainier/167,  and all commercial zones except CN (no change  recommended).  c. Diversion Facility and Diversion Interim Service Facility  i. Define as: “A facility that provides inpatient healthcare for individuals  that are self‐admitted or ordered, diverted, or referred from jails,  hospitals, doctors or similar treatment facilities or professionals, or by  first responders in King County including law enforcement, first  responders, hospital emergency department social workers, and  similar professionals. Services may include an array of inpatient  healthcare treatment and support services including but not limited  to screening and assessment, psychological counseling, case  management, crisis management, detox services, substance use and  trauma‐related treatment services, behavioral/mental health care,  medical isolation, care, or treatment, counseling, respite services and  various levels of accommodations for sleeping purposes. Some  outpatient healthcare services may be provided.”  1. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval in  the Medium Industrial (IM) and Heavy Industrial (IH) zones  south of I‐405 (no change recommended).   2. Limited to 100 individuals.  3. Remove the “Diversion Interim Service Facility” land use.  2) Clarify and correct text related to Title IV’s unclassified use interpretation process, the  distinctions between “principal” and “accessory” uses, and staff titles.  a. Principal Uses: Permitted uses are distinct from other uses listed separately in  RMC 4‐2‐060, Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations and/or  as defined.  b. Accessory Uses: Some accessory uses are specifically listed, whereas other  accessory uses are determined by the Administrator on a case‐by‐case basis.  c. Unclassified Uses: The Administrator, upon a proposed unclassified use, shall  indicate which zones, if any, do permit the use and may impose locational  restrictions and development standards.   d. Unclassified Use Criteria: The Administrator must find the use is in keeping  with the purpose and intent of the zone, the Renton Comprehensive Plan  policies and other adopted plans as may be applicable.  3) Allow a single COVID‐19 de‐intensification shelter for a limited term.  a. Define as: “Facility (whether situated inside or outside a building or a portion  of a building) used for the relocation of homeless shelters and encampments  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  for the purposes of de‐intensifying or reducing density in response to the  novel coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic.  i. No more than one may operate within the CA zone.  ii. After June 1, 2021, no COVID‐19 de‐intensification shelter shall serve  more than 100 individuals at a time.  iii. No COVID‐19 de‐intensification shelter may operate within the CA  zone after the expiration of the interim zoning controls, unless City  Council extends the allowance for such facility.   4) Add the following land uses along with approval criteria/standards, and zoning  locational and scale limitations: “extended‐stay hotel” and “homeless services use”  a. Extended‐stay Hotel: Same definition as “hotel” except: Kitchen and  sanitation may be provided in individual rooms, unlike hotels where kitchen  facilities in individual rooms are prohibited. No limits on length of stay.  i. Permitted outright in all industrial zones and the CO zone west of  Rainier/167. Permitted outright in the COR zone.  b. Homeless Services Use (i.e. day shelters and overnight shelters)  i. Based on Bellevue’s Municipal Code for Homeless Services Use;  ii. Proposed for the Light Industrial (IL), IM, IH, CV, CO, and CA zones;  iii. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval, and limited  to 100 individuals for overnight shelters;  iv. Shelters with more than 50 beds must be separated from other  Homeless Services Uses by at least ½ mile;  v. Requires pre‐application submittal of all submittal material;  vi. Requires pre‐application community meeting; and   vii. Requires pre‐application site and building inspection.  1. Submittal Materials: Narrative, procedures, and plans to  address potential issues based on the homeless population(s)  served (e.g., code of conduct, security, maintenance,  method(s) of communication to the community, City  Departments and local and state law enforcement).  2. Minimum General Requirements:   a. Adequate toilet, bathing, sleeping, laundry and  storage facilities;  b. Access to Wi‐Fi for occupants of the homeless  services use;  c. Recycling and solid waste collection facilities to meet  the demands;  d. Designated smoking areas located a minimum of 25  feet from perimeter of property lines;  e. Front desk staff provided during operating hours for  each homeless services use;  f. Designated and dignified privacy areas (e.g., lactation  rooms, medical/counseling rooms, etc.);  g. A permanent address and mailroom; and   h. A final safety and security plan  3. Minimum Day Shelter Requirements:   a. Access to electrical outlets to meet the demands  anticipated.  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  4. Minimum Overnight Shelter Requirements:   a. Overnight sleeping accommodations (not to exceed  100 beds).  b. A dedicated electrical outlet for every occupant of a  permanent bed.  5. Design:  a. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design  (CPTED). Examples include: Visibility of entrance and  exit points to and from any structure; open and well‐ lighted pedestrian connections; and video  surveillance of entrance and exit points.  6. Common Areas:   a. Common areas shall be provided to enhance resident  enjoyment through inclusion features such as  libraries, roof decks, patios, and gardens.   7. Mitigation Measures:   a. The City may impose conditions relating to the  development, design, use, or operation of a homeless  services use to mitigate environmental, public safety,  or other identifiable impacts.  8. Independent Technical Review:   a. The City may require the applicant to pay for  independent technical review by a consultant  retained by the City for review of materials submitted  by the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the  requirements.    Mayor Pavone invited public testimony:     Howard Schneiderman, attorney for King County, noted that he had submitted  written comments objecting to the adoption of the recommended ordinance.   Lisa Chait Rahman, attorney for DESC, noted that she had submitted written  comments objecting to the adoption of the recommended ordinance.   Allison Eisinger, Director of the Coalition on Homelessness, objected to the adoption  of the recommended ordinance.   Sumeer Singla, attorney for the owners of the Red Lion Hotel, objected to the  adoption of the recommended ordinance.   Daniel Malone, Executive Director of DESC, objected to the adoption of the  recommended ordinance, and emphasized that the City could have worked with the  service agencies to develop an ordinance that works for all parties involved.   Sara Cohn, from Washington Low‐Income Housing Alliance, objected to the adoption  of the recommended ordinance.   Sasha Pollock, Seattle, opposed the adoption of the recommended ordinance.   Alex Brennan, Executive Director of Futurewise, objected to the adoption of the  recommended ordinance.   Diane Dobson, CEO of the Renton Chamber of Commerce, explained that the City and  the Chamber had invited King County staff and officials to discuss options about the  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  use of the Red Lion Hotel as a deintensification at community meetings but had been  dismissed. She thanked City staff and officials for working towards lessening the  impact of the shelter on the community.    Lindsey Grad, Legislative Director for SEIU, opposed the adoption of the  recommended ordinance.    Krysta Strasbaugh, Renton, objected to the adoption of the recommended ordinance.   City Clerk Seth noted for the record that correspondence regarding this issue had  been received from Sumeer Singla, Dr. Jeffrey Durchin, Lisa Chait Rahman, Shannon  Braddock, Lindsey Grad, Marty Kooistra and Patience Malaba, and had been  forwarded to the Council and Administration. He noted that the correspondence is  available to the public by request from the City Clerk Division.     There being no further public comments or discussion, it was       MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CLOSE THE ORAL  TESTIMONY PORTION AND KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO ACCEPT WRITTEN  TESTIMONY, WHICH CAN BE DELIVERED TO CITYCLERK@RENTONWA.GOV, UNTIL  5:00 P.M. NOVEMBER 30, 2020 DECEMBER 1, 2020.**    Councilmember McIrvin remarked that additional time may be needed due to the  upcoming Thanksgiving Holiday.    MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO  STRIKE NOVEMBER 30, 2020 AND INSERT DECEMBER 1, 2020. CARRIED.    **MAIN MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED.    ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT     City Clerk Jason Seth reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City’s recent  progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2020 and  beyond. Items noted were:   Start your holiday shopping season with Small Business Saturday on November 28.  Renton’s small businesses are offering incentives to shop locally. The Renton  Downtown Partnership is providing free goodie bags to shoppers who spend $10 or  more at downtown merchants. The bags will include coupons, promotions, and  surprise treats, and will be available throughout the shopping season while supplies  last. Renton residents can win a Winter Staycation that includes a one‐night stay for  two at a Renton hotel as well as dining and shopping credits. All you have to do is  patronize a store or restaurant in Renton that is new to you. Post photos on your  Facebook or Instagram account during November and December and tag them with  #RentonHolidays. Each post gets you one entry, so the more you post, the more  chances to win.    Preventative street maintenance will continue to impact traffic and result in  occasional street closures.       AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  AUDIENCE COMMENTS     Diane Dobson, CEO of Renton Chamber of Commerce, thanked City officials and staff  for their hard work during the pandemic.      Paul Hagen, Renton, objected to the adoption of the ordinance amending City Code  regarding homeless shelters.      Joseph Todd, Renton, objected to the adoption of the ordinance amending City code  regarding homeless shelters.     CONSENT AGENDA  Items listed on the Consent Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing. Councilmember  Corman requested that Item 6.c be removed for separate consideration.   a)  Approval of Council Meeting minutes of November 16, 2020. Council Concur.   b) AB ‐ 2765 City Clerk recommended acceptance of the appraisal of Street Vacation Petition  VAC‐20‐001, with CITC (Construction Industry Training Center) for a one‐foot wide strip of  right‐of‐way, located near 1300 Bronson Way N and situated east of Garden Ave N, west of  Meadow Ave N, north of Bronson Way N, and south of N 2nd St, and submitted the staff  recommendation to set the compensation at zero dollars ($0). Refer to Transportation  (Aviation) Committee.   d) AB ‐ 2767 Community Services Department requested authorization to utilize approximately  $76,535 of the $261,505 Best Start for Kids grant to increase a term‐limited position from  0.50 FTE (full‐time equivalent) position to 0.75 FTE beginning January 1, 2021, and extending  the term of the position through December 31, 2021. Council Concur.   e) AB ‐ 2764 Community Services Department recommended approval of an agreement with the  Davey Resource Group, Inc., in the amount of $134,400, for certified arborist services for  2021. Refer to Finance Committee.   f) AB ‐ 2748 Human Resources / Risk Management Department recommended approval of the  2021‐2022 liability insurance renewal, with Alliant Insurance Services, in the estimated  amount of $480,000. Refer to Finance Committee.    MOVED BY PÉREZ, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE  CONSENT AGENDA, MINUS ITEM 6.c. CARRIED.    SEPARATE CONSIDERATION ITEM 6.c   c) AB ‐ 2766 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of an  emergency ordinance adopting interim zoning controls to amend Renton Municipal Code to  add "homeless services use" and "extended‐stay hotel" as land uses along with associated  definitions, applicable standards, and identified zones in which the uses are permitted,  conditionally permitted or prohibited, as well as clarifying definitions of "diversion facility,"  "hotel," and "social service organization," while eliminating the definition of "diversion  interim service facility;" and additionally recommending allowing a single COVID‐19 de‐ intensification facility in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone for a temporary period. Council  Concur.    MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL REFER ITEM 6.c TO THE  DECEMBER 7, 2020 COUNCIL MEETING. CARRIED.  AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES    UNFINISHED BUSINESS   a)  Committee of the Whole Council President Perez presented a report recommending  concurrence with the recommendation of the Administration to adopt the 2021 State Legislative,  Regional, and Federal Priorities as presented. The 2021 State Legislative Agenda and the 2021  State Support/Oppose Bills handout serves as a guidance for city staff as it works with the  legislature to achieve the city's goals. Additionally, the 2021 Regional and Federal Affairs Agenda  outlines the city's priorities and key issues related to the other government agencies and  jurisdictions that it coordinates with  and that impact community. The Committee further  authorizes the Administration to work with state, local and federal agencies and the Legislature  to advances these Priorities and that the resolution regarding this matter be presented when it is  ready.    MOVED BY PÉREZ, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE  COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   b) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  approve the following payments:  1. Accounts Payable – total payment of $6,484,248.35 for vouchers, 10203‐10216,  388281‐388282, 388285‐388534; payroll benefit withholding vouchers 6418‐6437,  388564‐388572 and two wire transfers.  2. Payroll – total payment of $1,505,924.28 for payroll vouchers that include 566 direct  deposits. (10/16/20‐10/31/20 pay period).  3. Kidder Mathews vouchers 6223 ‐ 6240 totaling $64,404.60.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE  RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   c) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  approve an amendment in the 2020 year end budget in the amount of $12,166,453 for an  amended total of $845,857,129.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE  RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   d) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Local Agency Agreement Supplement No. 3 to  CAG‐14‐066 with the Washington State Department of Transportation for the obligation of grant  funding and all subsequent agreements necessary to accomplish the Lake Washington Loop Trail  Phase 3 Project.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE  RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.   e) Finance Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to  approve the purchase of the Pure Network Storage System, including 24 months of support  subscription, installation, delivery and taxes from Ivoxy Consulting Inc. and per State of  Washington Participating State Contract in the amount of $247,977.61.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE  RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.      AGENDA ITEM #7. a) November 23, 2020 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES  LEGISLATION   Ordinance for first reading:   a) Ordinance No. 5995:  An ordinance was read amending the City of Renton fiscal years  2019/2020 Biennial Budget as adopted by Ordinance No. 5898, in the amount of $12,166,453,  adopting an amended 2020 City of Renton Salary Table, and establishing an effective date.    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR  SECOND AND FINAL READING AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. CARRIED.    NEW BUSINESS   Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar.    ADJOURNMENT    MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. TIME:  8:26 P.M.                          Jason A. Seth, MMC, City Clerk            Jason Seth, Recorder 23 Nov 2020   AGENDA ITEM #7. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar November 23, 2020 November 30, 2020 No Meetings – FIFTH MONDAY December 7, 2020 Monday 2:00 PM Committee on Committees, Chair Corman - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. 2021 Council Committee Assignments 3:00 PM Finance Committee, Chair Prince - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. Renewal of City’s Liability Insurance 2. Arborist Professional Services Agreement 3. Emerging Issues in Finance 3:30 PM Planning and Development Committee, Chair Corman - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. City of Renton and King County Growth Targets 2. Emerging Issues in CED 4:30 PM Transportation Committee, Chair McIrvin - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. Set Compensation for Bronson Way Street Vacation 5:00 PM Committee of the Whole, Chair Pérez - VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. Renton School District Meet and Greet 7:00 PM City Council Meeting, Chair Pérez – VIDEOCONFERENCE AGENDA ITEM #7. a) AB - 2772 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Bad Debt Write Off RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Jen Hughes, Financial Operations Manager EXT.: 6935 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The total value of debt submitted for write off is $36,222.87. SUMMARY OF ACTION: According to City Policy & Procedure 220-03, the City Council’s Finance Committee can recommend writing off of bad debt over $100.00 that has been deemed uncollectable from the City’s accounting records after approval. A detailed list of each account follows this memorandum. The total value of debt submitted for write off is $36,222.87. Finance staff reviews the outstanding debt and makes an attempt to locate the resident/business and collect payment. If unsuccessful, the debt is turned over to a collecti on agency. After 12 months, Finance staff reviews the uncollected outstanding debts with the collection agency to identify debts that cannot be collected. In the case of the attached report, the debt relates to customers whose debt remains uncollectable based on the business closing, bankruptcy filed, or unable to locate the customer. Per Policy 220 -03, the debt held at the collection agency and still outstanding after one year should be written off. EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the write off of the listed debts from the City’s accounting records. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 30, 2020 TO: Ruth Pérez, Council President Members of Renton City Council FROM: Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Jen Hughes, Financial Operations Manager SUBJECT: Bad Debt Write Off According to City Policy & Procedure 220-03, the City Council’s Finance Committee can recommend writing off of bad debt over $100.00 that has been deemed uncollectable from the City’s accounting records after approval. A detailed list of each account follows this memorandum. The total value of debt submitted for write off is $36,222.87. Finance staff reviews the outstanding debt and makes an attempt to locate the resident/business and collect payment. If unsuccessful, the debt is turned over to a collection agency. After 12 months, Finance staff reviews the uncollected outstanding debts with the collection agency to identify debts that cannot be collected. In the case of the attached report, the debt relates to customers whose debt remains uncollectable based on the business closing, bankruptcy filed, or unable to locate the customer. Per Policy 220-03, the debt held at the collection agency and still outstanding after one year should be written off. Finance staff requests the Council’s approval to write off the listed debts from the City’s accounting records. cc: Kari Roller, Fiscal Services Director AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CUST # CUSTOMER NAME DATEINVOICE #OUTSTANDINGBALANCEDESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT Notes6356 ABU‐ALHASHEM, SULTANA 2/3/201743667510.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6569 ADAMS, MONIQUE 12/11/201745557325.35              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17824 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6657 AKELIPA, IONA 7/12/201846861107.95              RETURNED CHECK GOLF GOLF UNABLE TO LOCATE6563 ALLEN, JODY K 12/11/201745499308.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4940 ALMBERG, MELODY 7/12/201333893174.09              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6741 BARKER, NANCY 10/26/201847451300.00              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17881 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5945 BAUTISTA‐RAMIREZ, VIDAL 4/20/201641459400.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6571 BELTRAN, MARIA ISABEL 12/11/201745559347.06              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17615 17616 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5398 BENHAM, STACIE LYNN 10/29/201437701176.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5245 BENNINGFIELD, SHAWN 6/17/201436747408.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6562 BERRY, LAQIA 12/11/201745498842.80              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5038 BOHANNON, KENNETH 11/14/201334936295.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5283 BOLSTER, MELISSA MARIE 7/28/201436997420.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5937 BOUTWELL, TANNER 4/7/201641398290.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5983 BRINKMAN, CHRISTOPHER ROBERT 5/25/201641667960.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6560 BROWN, TIMOTHY 12/11/201745496132.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5939 BRUNO, SHAWN CLAYTON 4/7/201641400353.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4945 BURTON, REBECCA 7/12/201333898288.31              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6816 CAGE, DANNETT 5/8/201948686, 48692255.00              RETURNED CHECK RCC COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE5070 CALIXTO, ROBERT DALE 12/12/201335216205.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4543 CAMERON, DANIEL R 10/12/201127310149.00              RETURNED CHECK COURT COURT UNABLE TO LOCATE5071 CARTER, XAVIER D 12/12/201335217240.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4942 CHING, YUHUAN 7/12/201333895186.57              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE5284 CORTEZ, RUBEN ANTHONY 7/28/201436998768.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6461 CURTIS, COLIN 7/19/201744621360.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5343 DAHL, KATHLEEN 9/16/201437421440.00              COMMUNITY CENTER FEESCOMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE4944 DEGOOD, DONNA L 7/12/201333897454.94              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6507 DENNEY, LADAWN 9/21/201745002160.00              RCC DAYCAMP FEES COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6612 DOPP, KRISTI 3/1/201846122665.02              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17645 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5158 EDLIN, KELLY 4/25/201436242120.00              COMMUNITY CENTER TUITION COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6460 EDWARDS, ALONZO 7/19/201744620794.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5020 EDWARDS, ELEA TAMILA 10/18/201334683264.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5075 ELLERS, NICOLE MARIE 12/12/201335221175.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6434 ESPINOZA, JORGE R 6/12/201744394770.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5072 FRANCIS, SHANE S 12/12/201335218450.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5434 FRANKLIN, CALEB 11/18/201437926145.00              HEARING COSTS ASSESSED POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4937 FUENTES, TONY & SHANNON 7/12/201333890313.17              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE5515 GEERHART, BRYON 3/17/201641234200.00              FALSE ALARMS POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5912 GEERHART, BRYON 3/29/201641277300.00              FALSE ALARMS POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4933 GOODEN, DAVID & LEISA 7/12/201333886406.72              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6645 GRADIN, RENEE 6/5/201846668207.70              RCC SCHOLARSHIP COPAY 2018 COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE5037 HA, TUYEN THI 11/14/201334935300.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6038 HARJINDER SINGH, CHANA 6/29/201641960576.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6432 HEMPHILL, VYANNI LESHA 6/12/201744392105.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6511 HERNANDEZ, KARRI 9/25/201745009340.00              RCC DAYCAMP FEES COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6739 HUBNER, ROBERT 10/26/201847449421.27              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17882 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATEBAD DEBTAGENDA ITEM #7. b) CUST # CUSTOMER NAME DATEINVOICE #OUTSTANDINGBALANCEDESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT NotesBAD DEBT5401 HUNT, DAVID FLOYD 10/29/201437704460.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5400 HYLER, CASEY WINSTON 10/29/201437703696.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6552 INLOW, NICHOLAS 11/28/201745378350.00              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17819 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5040 ISABELL, TRAMAINE ANDRE 11/14/201334937375.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE2674 JACK'S PUB & GRILL 1/16/201435534, 35535, 35537, 35539, 35541, 35536, 35543, 35542, 35540, 35538, 371942,959.41             GAMB TAXES ‐ DEVICES 2013 Q2 FINANCE BUSINESS CLOSED ‐ UNABLE TO LOCATE2063 KIM, LISA 9/21/201745000160.00              RCC DAYCAMP FEES COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6464 KIMBALL, BRENDA 7/19/201744624177.24              RCC REGISTRATION FEESCOMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE5771 KND URBAN FAMILY, /ANNIE PATU 10/30/201540281512.00              HM AQUATIC CENTER 2015‐07 COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE5247 KOCH, JEFFREY ROBERT 6/17/201436748414.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4992 LEE, PAUL 9/27/201334466716.49              PROPERTY DAMAGE GC 2013‐08 RISK MANAGEMENT UNABLE TO LOCATE5249 LINDESY, NIGEL KENNITH 6/17/201436750392.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6683 MAGANA, CRISTIAN 8/27/201847062150.00              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17851 17852 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6585 MEJIA, IDALIA 1/24/201845917797.05              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17630 17631 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4941 MINK, TERRY 7/12/201333894119.95              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6570 MORIS‐RIDGE, STEVEN 12/11/201745558577.41              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17610 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5286 MORRIS, RIELEY WILLIAM 7/28/201437000397.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5341 NUNN, DARREL 9/10/201437401145.00              HEARING COSTS ASSESSED POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5711 ONUFREYCHUK, ANDREW 9/22/201539948419.20              RETURNED CHECK RCC COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6493 PAINE, TAIQUITTA 9/1/2017 44831, 44921 177.50              RETURNED CHECK HMAC COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6663 PAINE, TAQUITTA 7/26/201846898305.00              RETURNED CHECK HMAC COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE4903 PETERSON, CHARLES 6/11/201333550174.56              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE4623 PHAN, THERESA THUY 2/22/201228547726.93              RE‐BILL PROP DAMAGE LIGHT POLE RISK MANAGEMENT UNABLE TO LOCATE5709 QUINTANA, TERRI 9/18/201539931155.00              RCC DAYCAMP FEES COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6473 RICHARDSON, MIA 8/8/201744734125.00              RCC DANCE PROGRAMS COMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6742 RIVAS, DESIREE M 10/30/201847465392.49              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17891 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4936 RUDOLPH, EUGENE 7/12/201333889268.11              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE4948 SAKRAW, JANET 12/19/201438162225.32              FALSE ALARMS POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6522 SARGINSON, JENNIFER 10/20/201745168155.39              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17797 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4953 SCARRY, JASON 7/12/201333906466.03              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE4841 SCHMIDT, STEVEN J 1/18/201332396187.65              PROPERTY DAMAGE F098 RISK MANAGEMENT UNABLE TO LOCATE6370 SETE, ANTONIO P 2/24/201743763104.63              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5399 SHEARER, ROBERT OWEN 10/29/201437702948.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4951 SHEW, MONTANA & NICOLE 7/12/201333904243.05              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE5287 SISAVATH, HOUY 7/28/201437001525.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5073 SPINKS, RONALD 12/12/201335219690.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4952 STEFFEN, VINCENT 7/12/201333905198.49              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE4946 THORNTON, ALAN 7/12/201333899128.25              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE4905 TRAN, THACH 6/11/201333552321.09              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6041 TSANG, TREVOR 9/9/201642597150.00              FALSE ALARMS POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4947 UNDERWOOD, STEVE 7/12/201333900108.08              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE6582 VAN, JENNIFER 12/31/201745900887.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CUST # CUSTOMER NAME DATEINVOICE #OUTSTANDINGBALANCEDESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT NotesBAD DEBT6368 WATSON JR, BRUCE 2/24/201743761945.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE6431 WESTBROOK, SHANNON WHAYNE 6/12/201744391518.00              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5320 WILLIAMS, FAITH 8/29/201437305150.00              COMMUNITY CENTER FEESCOMMUNITY SERVICES UNABLE TO LOCATE6580 WOAGAY, ERITRA MENGSTE 1/8/201845860174.62              ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES #17621 POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE5187 YARBROUGH, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS 5/13/201436465152.85              ELECTRONIC HOME DETENTION POLICE UNABLE TO LOCATE4904 YOUNG, LISA 6/11/201333551393.13              PAST DUE UTILITY BILLING FEES UTILITY BILLING UNABLE TO LOCATE36,222.87        AGENDA ITEM #7. b) AB - 2771 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Emergency Economic Recovery Ordinance Extension and Amendment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director EXT.: 7314 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The waiver of parking fees in the City Center Parking Garage would result in a projected revenue loss of $9,825.93 if parking fee waivers stay in effect until June 7, 2021. There are no other anticipated fiscal impacts associated with the adoption of this ordinance. SUMMARY OF ACTION: CED requests amendment and extension of an emergency ordinance to advance economic recovery for businesses in Renton in response to the phased opening of commercial businesses following the Covid-19 declared public health emergency. The original ordinance allowed for the temporary use of the right-of-way and other outdoor areas such as surface parking lots for business operations including sidewalk sales, sidewalk pick-up, and additional outdoor restaurant seating areas, with a no-fee Economic Recovery Revocable Right-of-Way Permit, until Phase 4 or December 31, 2020 of the Governor’s Safe Start Plan (whichever occurs first). And further, the original ordinance allowed for businesses to display Economic Recovery Signs including temporary A-Frame and Event signs without a permit or fee until December 31, 2020. CED Staff proposes to extend expirations on currently issued Economic Recovery Revocable Right-of-Way Permits and to include, non-structural and pre-fabricated parklets for temporary use in the right of way in Center Downtown. And further, the ordinance shall be amended to waive the requirement of a Temporary Use Permit for businesses who wish to expand into adjacent vacant space in a multi-tenant building in compliance with the Governor’s Safe Start plan and public health guidelines for COVID-19. Lastly, staff is requesting to temporarily establish a limited number of short term public parking stalls within the Center Downtown to support curbside pickup. To offset the increase in short-term on street parking fees for periods of up to 10 hours are proposed to be waived in the City Center parking garage. The amended ordinance is proposed to be extended until June 14, 2021. EXHIBITS: A. Ordinance STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance to amend and extend an emergency ordinance for six (6) months to advance economic recovery for businesses in Renton by providing updates to the no-fee Economic Recovery Revocable Right-of-Way Permit, waiving land use requirements for temporary business expansions in adjacent vacant storefronts, establishing short term curbside pickup stalls in the Center Downtown, and waiving fees in the Downtown Parking Garage up to 10 hours until Phase 4 of the Safe Start Plan, or June 14, 2021, whichever occurs first. AGENDA ITEM #7. c) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON  ORDINANCE NO. ________  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING AND  AMENDING THE INTERIM ZONING CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.  5974 IN RESPONSE TO THE OPERATIONAL LIMITS ON BUSINESSES DURING THE  COVID‐19 DECLARED PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY BY (1) EXTENDING THE  TEMPORARY “ECONOMIC RECOVERY REVOCABLE RIGHT‐OF‐WAY PERMIT” FOR  BUSINESSES; (2) EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY “ECONOMIC RECOVERY SIGNS”  FOR BUSINESSES; AND (3) AMENDING THE INTERIM ZONING CONTROL TO  WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR THE  TEMPORARY EXPANSION OF A BUSINESS INTO AN ADJACENT VACANT SPACE IN  A MULTI‐TENANT BUILDING; AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY DESIGNATION OF  A LIMITED NUMBER OF EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE CENTER  DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PARKING FOR SHORT‐TERM  CURBSIDE PICK‐UP OR TO GO ORDERS FROM BUSINESSES; TEMPORARILY  WAIVING PARKING FEES FOR PARKING FOR PERIODS OF UP TO 10 HOURS  WITHIN THE CITY’S CITY CENTER PARKING GARAGE LOCATED AT 655 SOUTH 2ND  STREET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND  ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.  WHEREAS, on July 13, 2020, in response to business‐related impacts due to the novel  coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic, the City Council adopted interim zoning controls via  Ordinance No. 5974, valid through December 31, 2020 or the date that the City enters Phase 4  of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever occurred first; and  WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5974 established a new type of temporary right‐of‐way permit  known as an “Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permit” which is similar to existing  right‐of‐way permits but does not carry a permit fee to assist businesses that are able to use  public right‐of‐way and/or their private parking lot areas in order to expand the area within which  customers could be served – in keeping with appropriate social distancing standards and other  public health guidelines – in order to help struggling businesses including restaurants survive and  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  help keep the employees who depend on the jobs that have been impacted and jeopardized by  the coronavirus shut‐downs employed; and   WHEREAS, parklets and prefabricated outdoor spaces meet the intended purpose of  “expanding the area within which a business may provide goods or services to customers while  keeping with public health guidelines” that served as the basis for establishing Economic  Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits, and, thus, the City Council wishes to allow for them  as an element of encouraging economic recovery in the City; and   WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5974 also established and temporarily allowed businesses to  place signs  known as “Economic Recovery Signs” in the form of A‐Frame Signs and Event Signs,  through December 31, 2020; and  WHEREAS, the City has not yet entered Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, and the  City Council has determined that there is a need to extend beyond December 31, 2020 the  interim zoning controls establishing the Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of Way Permit and   establishing and allowing Economic Recovery Signs; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further considered the impacts to City businesses and the  public caused by the COVID‐19 pandemic.  As a result, the City Council has determined that there  is a need to temporarily waive the requirement to obtain a Temporary Use Permit for the  following activity:  the temporary expansion of a business into an adjacent vacant space in a  multi‐tenant building in compliance with the Governor’s Safe Start plan and public heath  guidelines for COVID‐19; and   AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 7, 2020, to consider a six‐ month extension of and amendment to the interim zoning controls established in Ordinance No.  5974; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that designating a limited number of  existing public parking stalls within the area zoned Center Downtown (CD) as short‐term parking  for curbside pick‐up or to go orders may also assist the struggling downtown business  community, and the City Council further finds that there is not a comparable need to designate  short‐term parking for businesses outside of the area zoned CD; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that to accommodate the anticipated  increases in short‐term parking in the Center Downtown and to assist the struggling downtown  business community, hourly parking fees in the City’s City Center Parking Garage located at 655  S 2nd St. should be temporarily waived for parking periods of up to 10 hours;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN as follows:  SECTION I.  The above recitals are adopted as findings of fact in support of the interim  controls adopted herein pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, and are found to be  true and correct in all respects.   SECTION II.   Council hereby extends and amends the interim zoning control  temporarily establishing the new permit known as an Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of  Way Permit in the City of Renton.  Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits shall be:  (1) Available to businesses seeking to use the public right‐of‐way fronting their businesses  and/or their private parking lots abutting their businesses to expand the area within which  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  customers are served, such as for sidewalk sales, sidewalk pick‐up, parklets without structural  components, pre‐fabricated and engineered parklets, and/or outdoor restaurant seating.   Obtaining an Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permit for such uses shall not excuse a  business from complying with applicable public health requirements and guidelines, including  social distancing; and  (2) In effect from the date of issuance through June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters  Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever occurs first; and  (3)  Subject to the same application and review process as a revocable right‐of‐way permit  issued under RMC 4‐8‐120 and RMC Chapter 9‐2, except that no application fee or permit fee  shall be required; and  (4)  Subject to leasehold excise tax to the same extent as a revocable right‐of‐way permit  issued under RMC 4‐8‐120 and RMC Chapter 9‐2.  (5) For Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits that were approved and/or  issued between July 8, 2020 and December 31, 2020 and that were still valid and unexpired as of  the effective date of this ordinance, the following shall apply: The period of validity that would  otherwise apply under the standard expiration dates listed in this ordinance is extended until  June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever  occurs first.  SECTION III. As an interim zoning control, Council hereby extends the period for the  new sign type known as an Economic Recovery Sign in the City of Renton, by extending the same  regulations established under Ordinance No. 5974 for such signs.  Accordingly, Economic  Recovery Signs shall continue to be subject to the following for an extended period as stated:  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  (1) Allowed for businesses to advertise economic recovery‐related events such as grand  re‐openings or expanded services or capacities; and  (2) Allowed in the form of A‐Frame Signs and Event Signs, as further specified below; and  (3) If an A‐Frame Sign, subject to the following standards and requirements drawn from  RMC 4‐4‐100.J.5:  a. Number:   i. Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: Only one of these signs is  permitted per business per street frontage.  ii. Elsewhere in the City: One of these signs is permitted per business per  street frontage and, in addition, an additional sign is permitted to be located  abutting the business and building to which the sign relates.  b. Location Requirements:         i. Permitted Location:  (1) Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: A‐frame signs must be  placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.  (2) Elsewhere in the City: A‐frame signs may be located on the  public sidewalk abutting the business site and/or within the  landscaping area on or abutting the business site, however, A‐frame  signs cannot be placed in the landscape strip between the curb and  outer edge of the public sidewalk. Additionally, for businesses  located within shopping centers, an additional A‐frame sign may be  placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  ii. Pedestrian Clearance: A minimum of four feet (4') of unobstructed  sidewalk area between the outer edge of the sign and the street curb is  required.   iii. Clear Vision Area: No sign shall be located as to pose a danger and violate  the clear vision area specified in subsection RMC 4‐4‐100.C.6, Prohibited  Signs. Where a traffic vision hazard is created, the City may require a  modification to the height or location of a sign to the degree necessary to  eliminate the hazard.  c. Size: Signs shall be no larger than thirty‐two inches (32") wide and thirty‐six  inches (36") tall.  d. Construction Specifications and Materials: The sign must be professionally  manufactured of durable material(s). No lighting or attachments, such as balloons  are permitted.  e. Maintenance and Appearance: Signs must be maintained in accordance with  the provisions of RMC 4‐4‐100.D.3, Sign Maintenance Required, and subsection  RMC 4‐4‐100.D.4, Appearance of Signs.   f. Alteration of Landscaping Prohibited: No landscaping may be damaged or  modified to accommodate an A‐frame sign. The City may require replacement of  any damaged landscaping pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐070.Q, Damaged Landscaping.   g. Removal upon Close of Business Required: A‐frame signs shall not be displayed  during nonbusiness hours.  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  h. Proof of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement for Signs on Public Right‐of‐ Way: Before placing any such A‐Frame sign, the business must provide the  Community & Economic Development Department’s Development Services  Division with (1) proof of general commercial liability insurance (certificate of  liability insurance) meeting the requirements of RMC 4‐4‐100.L.4 and (2) a signed  hold harmless agreement that specifies that the owner of the sign will defend,  indemnify, and hold the City harmless for any loss, injuries, damage, claims or  lawsuit, including attorney’s fees that arise from the sign.  i. Confiscation of Signs: Signs that do not comply with these provisions may be  confiscated by the City; and  (4) If an Event Sign, subject to the following standards and requirements drawn from RMC  4‐4‐100.J.6:      a.  [Intentionally omitted.]  b. Types of Event Signage Allowed: Any combination of the following types of  signage are permitted: balloons, pole/wall strung and wall‐hung banners not  exceeding one hundred (100) square feet each in size, pole‐hung banners not  exceeding twenty (20) square feet each in size, flags, inflatable statuary,  pennants/streamers, searchlights, wind animated objects, and other similar  advertising devices approved by the Development Services Division. Rigid portable  signs are also allowed provided the sign is a maximum of thirty‐two (32) square  feet in area on one face per sign not exceeding six feet (6') in height. Rigid portable  signs are limited to one per street frontage outside the Automall.  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  c. [Intentionally omitted.]  d. [Intentionally omitted.]  e. Placement Limitations for Event Signs:  i. Roof: No sign or advertising device shall be placed on top of a roof or extend  vertically above the fascia of the building.   ii. Perimeter Street Landscaping: Event signage shall not be located within  required perimeter street landscaping; and  (5) Allowed without a permit and without a fee through June 7, 2021.  SECTION IV. As an interim zoning control, Council hereby temporarily waives the  requirement to obtain a Temporary Use Permit for the temporary expansion of a business into  an adjacent vacant space in a multi‐tenant building in compliance  with the Governor’s Safe Start  plan and public heath guidelines for COVID‐19.  All other permits required for such expansions  shall continue to be required.  SECTION V.  Council hereby temporarily approves the designation by the Administrator  of the Public Works Department, or designee, of a limited number of existing public parking stalls  within the Center Downtown (CD) zone to support short‐term parking for curbside pick‐up or to  go orders from businesses located in the City center.    SECTION VI. Council hereby temporarily waives the following parking fees established in  Section III of the City of Renton Fee Schedule for the following parking periods within the City  Center Parking Garage:     Zero (0) to two (2) hours;   Two (2) to four (4) hours;  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9   Four (4) to six (6) hours; and   Six (6) to (10) hours.  SECTION VII. The Mayor or his designee is authorized to implement any and all  administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.  SECTION VIII. A public hearing was held on December 7, 2020.  SECTION IX.  The interim controls extended, amended, and established herein shall be  in effect until June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start  plan, whichever occurs first, unless earlier lifted or subsequently extended by action of the City  Council.  SECTION X. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION XI. The City Council declares an emergency for the protection of the public  welfare and to enable the purpose and intent of this ordinance to be accomplished. This  ordinance shall take effect immediately when passed by the City Council. The City Clerk shall  cause to be published a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary  shall consist of this ordinance’s title.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                             Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    AGENDA ITEM #7. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                             Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication:        ORD:2151:12/3/2020  AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AB - 2766 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Adopt the Following Interim Zoning Controls: Clarifying Hotel, Social Service Organizations, and Diversion Facility Land Use Definitions; Defining and Establishing Regulations for Homeless Service Land Uses; and Amending the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning District to Allow One COVID-19 Deintensification Shelter to Temporarily Operate RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: C. E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator EXT.: 6588 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Department of Community and Economic Development requests adoption of an emergency interim zoning control ordinance. Within that ordinance, staff recommend amending Renton Municipal Code Title IV by adding “homeless services use” and “extended-stay hotel,” as land uses, along with associated definitions, applicable standards, and identified zones in which the uses are permitted, conditionally permitted, or prohibited, in addition to any other locational restrictions as may be stated. Furthermore, staff recommend clarifying the definitions of “diversion facility,” “hotel” and “social service organization” while also eliminating the definition of “diversion interim service facility.” Additionally, staff recommend allowing a single COVID-19 de-intensification facility in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone for a temporary period. Finally, staff recommend that the Council direct staff to further investigate these matters and to prepare and present recommended permanent legislation. EXHIBITS: A. Memo to Council B. Draft Ordinance STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the emergency ordinance adopting interim zoning controls and direct staff to further investigate the matters and prepare and present recommended permanent legislation. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY  & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND   DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES    M   E   M   O   R   A   N   D   U   M       DATE: December 3, 2020     TO: Ruth Pérez, Council President  Members of Renton City Council     VIA: Armondo Pavone, Mayor     FROM: C.E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator, ext. 6588  Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator, ext. 6617     SUBJECT: Draft Ordinance:  Interim Zoning Control – Homeless Shelters       INTRODUCTION:    During its November 23, 2020 regular meeting, the City Council held a public hearing on  the following matter: “Emergency Ordinance – Interim Zoning Controls – Homeless  Shelters.”  The then‐current draft of the proposed ordinance was included in the  Council’s November 23, 2020 agenda materials and made available to the public.    Prior to, during, and following the public hearing, the Council and City staff have  received valuable input from the public regarding the proposed ordinance.  City staff  have reviewed the public’s input and prepared an updated draft of the proposed  ordinance.  The updated draft is included in the Council’s December 7, 2020 agenda  materials.    Meanwhile, some of the public comment and media coverage regarding the proposed  ordinance contain misunderstandings about the purpose and effect of the ordinance.   Accordingly, this memorandum describes and clarifies the December 7 draft of the  proposed ordinance.     Discussion follows on the next page.            AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ruth Pérez, Council President  Page 2 of 6  December 3, 2020    DISCUSSION:    A. The Ordinance’s Relationship to King County’s and DESC’s Operations at the  Renton Red Lion Property.    1. Adopting the ordinance as an “emergency” allows immediate legal relief to the  DESC operations at the Renton Red Lion property, which is currently operating  illegally at the site.  It also responds to the urgent needs associated more  generally with homelessness by allowing new homeless shelters to be situated  in the City under a permitting process.      Currently, the Renton Municipal Code does not allow a COVID‐19 deintensification  shelter to lawfully operate in the Red Lion property’s zoning district (Commercial  Arterial (CA)).  King County’s unilateral relocation of the DESC shelter to a Commercial  Arterial‐zoned property without any coordination with the City and unwillingness to  comply with code enforcement efforts by the City highlight the need for direct  legislation.  Without this legislation, the City Administration will be required to continue  to enforce the current code through expensive and time‐consuming litigation.       Adopting this ordinance as an “emergency” allows the Council to take immediate  ameliorative action to convert DESC’s operations at the Renton Red Lion property from  illegal to lawful under the City’s zoning code.  Such immediate action cannot occur  under the ordinary timeframes associated with adopting development regulations.    More broadly, the City’s zoning code did not anticipate the primary use of a property  being an overnight homeless shelter.  This emergency ordinance defines for the first  time what an overnight shelter is and how such a use will be regulated throughout the  City.    Although City staff is not aware of any planned new long‐term overnight shelters in the  City, without this emergency interim legislation, the City Administration will be required  to deny new shelters from being established and/or take code enforcement action  against those that may be established in defiance of the City’s code or on the basis of  erroneous interpretations of the existing code.       The City recognizes that homelessness is a regional problem that requires urgent  attention, but shelters such as the one at the Red Lion hotel has the imminent potential  to lead to health and safety risks in the community and create uncertainty for residents  of illegally operated shelters.  By adopting interim regulations (as opposed to a  moratorium) while further legislation is being developed, an anticipated new shelter  operator could begin a permitting process without waiting for the normal time  consuming process to elapse for permanent zoning changes.    AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ruth Pérez, Council President  Page 3 of 6  December 3, 2020      2. The ordinance does not require DESC residents to be evicted.  The ordinance  provides King County and DESC significantly additional time to relocate the  shelter to a lawful location.    If King County and DESC take action to relocate the Renton Red Lion shelter (whether  within the City of Renton or elsewhere), none of the DESC residences will be forced to  be evicted.    The Renton Red Lion shelter is operating in violation of City zoning laws with no  certainty as to whether and when it will be required to cease operations.  For this  reason, since April 2020, City leadership has unwaveringly urged King County and DESC  to make and implement a plan to relocate the shelter to a lawful location.    This ordinance represents the City offering a partnership with King County and DESC.   Under the ordinance, the City would allow the Renton Red Lion shelter to continue to  operate as it is currently being used until June 2021.  Beginning in June 2021, King  County and DESC would operate the Renton Red Lion shelter at a scaled‐down level  (approximately 50%) and then complete relocation by January 1, 2022.      Here are the details, as found in the December 7 draft of the proposed ordinance:     Deadline to scale down (June 1, 2021):    o The ordinance allows every one of the Renton Red Lion shelter’s  residents to remain legally in the shelter until June 1, 2021.    o After June 1, 2021, the Renton Red Lion shelter’s operations must host no  more than 125 residents.  The remaining portion of the Renton Red Lion  hotel building could then return to a hotel use.   Deadline to complete relocation (January 1, 2022):  o In addition to scaling down to no more than 125 residents by June 1,  2021, by January 1, 2022, the Renton Red Lion shelter must complete its  relocation to a lawful location.    o This additional year of operation through 2021 is nearly twelve times  more lead time than King County had in March of 2020 to relocate the  current residents from a Seattle shelter to the Renton Red Lion property.            AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ruth Pérez, Council President  Page 4 of 6  December 3, 2020    3. The ordinance does not prohibit the Renton Red Lion hotel (or any other hotel)  from renting individual rooms for more than 30 days or accepting vouchers for  homeless residents to stay at the hotel.     The ordinance does not prevent the Renton Red Lion hotel (or any other hotel) from  renting individual rooms for more than 30 days, or from renting individual rooms to  homeless individuals, or even from renting a portion of its rooms to government  agencies supporting homeless individuals.  Such a situation is distinguishable from what  has occurred at the Renton Red Lion property:  converting an entire hotel building into a  homeless services use that has continuously endured for eight months and counting.      B. The Ordinance’s Relationship to Homeless Services throughout Renton.    1. The ordinance does not prohibit new homeless shelters; it explicitly allows  them subject to permit.    A purpose of this ordinance is to explicitly allow new homeless shelters to operate with  reasonable regulations that are designed to protect residents of those shelters and their  neighboring communities. The regulations are mostly borrowed from the City of  Bellevue’s homeless services regulations, but have been refined in the December 7 draft  of the proposed legislation to more rigorously incorporate equity lens perspectives, and  will be further reviewed by staff with input from the community for improvements to be  incorporated into permanent legislation.          2. The ordinance does not prevent coordination with homeless service providers,  and it does not make unlawful any existing, lawful operation.     The ordinance is interim temporary zoning that would create a temporary set of rules,  based on those adopted by the City of Bellevue (much of which the City of Puyallup has  also adopted), that will be in place for no longer than six (6) months if the Council takes  no subsequent formal action. During that time, the City can work with the community –  including coordinating with homeless service providers – and with the City’s Planning  Commission to develop further legislation.     Meanwhile, the ordinance does not render as illegal any existing, lawful operation (such  as the Cold Weather Shelter).  No existing, lawful operation will be shut down as a result  of the ordinance.            AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ruth Pérez, Council President  Page 5 of 6  December 3, 2020    3. City staff recommends limiting the capacity of overnight shelters to 100 to  mitigate impacts on the surrounding community.    The capacity restriction of 100 residents is also contained in the City of Bellevue’s  homeless services regulations.  The need for this type of limitation is evidenced by the  impacts DESC’s Renton Red Lion shelter have created both within the shelter and in the  areas surrounding the shelter, as well as the amount of resources Renton’s emergency  service providers have had to dedicate to a single property.       The Renton Red Lion shelter operators insist that deintensifying the density in which its  high‐need, low‐barrier residents live reduces interpersonal conflicts and calls to 9‐1‐1.   Although these conflicts may have reduced as compared to a congregate shelter  environment, the increase in crime and demands upon Renton’s emergency responders  indicate a need for further deintensification to limit impacts at a single location and  further limit interpersonal conflicts between residents.      The Renton Red Lion shelter operators argue that they cannot control behaviors of their  residents in and around the shelter.  The limitation of number of residents, therefore, is  not likely to eliminate the impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, but it is expected  to proportionately reduce those impacts.      C. This Ordinance Is Interim Legislation; Further Legislation Is Anticipated.    The proposed ordinance before the Council is interim legislation.  The ordinance itself  expressly states that City staff will further study the subject matter of the ordinance for  further legislation by Council.  Such further legislation is anticipated within the first half  of 2021.      During development of the further legislation, City staff will seek additional public input  and feedback, including from the community of homeless service providers.  Our  commitment to investigating whether there is room to improve upon the interim  regulations in the anticipated future legislation includes, but is not limited to:   Further applying the City of Renton’s equity lens to the legislation;   Continuing review under potentially applicable laws and regulations, such as the  Federal Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and equal  protection rights;   Investigating the balance between homeless services use regulations that are  workable for providers but that appropriately mitigate compatibility issues  between shelters and surrounding land uses;    Refining the definitions of and regulations for similar land uses: Homeless  Services Uses, Social Service Organizations, and Diversion Facilities; and   Investigating whether low barrier shelters, such as those that welcome active  users of illegal drugs, and shelters that enforce expectations for their guests to  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ruth Pérez, Council President  Page 6 of 6  December 3, 2020    observe community norms and laws should be regulated differently than each  other.    Please do not hesitate to contact us at any time regarding this matter.    cc: Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer   Shane Moloney, City Attorney   Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director  AGENDA ITEM #7. d)   1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE  FOLLOWING INTERIM ZONING CONTROLS IN RESPONSE TO THE RENTON RED  LION COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER OPERATING IN THE CITY OF  RENTON SINCE APRIL 2020: (1) CLARIFYING AND MODIFYING PRINCIPAL,  ACCESSORY, AND UNCLASSIFIED USE REGULATIONS BY AMENDING  SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐050.A, 4‐2‐050.C.4, 4‐2‐050.C.5, AND 4‐2‐050.C.6 OF THE  RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; (2) CLARIFYING AND MODIFYING CERTAIN LAND USE  DEFINITIONS IN THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 4‐ 2‐060.K OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF  “DIVERSION FACILITY” AND REMOVING THE DEFINITION OF “DIVERSION  INTERIM SERVICE FACILITY” IN SECTION 4‐11‐040 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL  CODE, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “HOTEL” AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF  “HOTEL, EXTENDED‐STAY” IN SECTION 4‐11‐080 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL  CODE, AND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS”  IN SECTION 4‐11‐190 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; (3) ALLOWING FOR ONE  COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER TO TEMPORARILY OPERATE IN THE  COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) ZONING DISTRICT BY ADDING A DEFINITION OF  “COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER” IN SECTION 4‐11‐030 OF THE RENTON  MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐060.G, 4‐2‐080.A.71, AND  4‐2‐080.A.101 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; AND (4) ALLOWING FOR AND  REGULATING LAND USES SERVING THOSE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS BY  ADDING A NEW SECTION 4‐4‐045, HOMELESS SERVICES USE, TO THE RENTON  MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF “HOMELESS SERVICES USE” TO  SECTION 4‐11‐080 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; MAKING A LEGISLATIVE  DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FULL COMPLIANCE  WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (CHAPTER 43.21.C RCW);  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND  ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.   WHEREAS, in early 2020, the World Health Organization announced that the novel  coronavirus (COVID‐19) was a global pandemic, the United States Department of Health and  Human Services Secretary Alex Azar declared a public health emergency because of the COVID‐ 19 pandemic, and Washington Governor Inslee declared a State of Emergency due to COVID‐19;  and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, the Mayor proclaimed a local emergency due to COVID‐19;  and  WHEREAS, on March 31, 2020, King County’s Local Health Officer, Dr. Jeff Duchin, issued  a Local Health Officer Order (which Dr. Duchin amended on May 20, 2020) (collectively, the  “County Health Order”) authorizing King County to use only “legally available” resources to “de‐ intensify or reduce the density of existing homelessness shelters and encampments” in response  to the COVID‐19 pandemic, and further emphasized that the County Health Order did not  “authorize illegal means or behavior;” and  WHEREAS, on April 2, 2020, King County leased the Red Lion Hotel & Conference Center  located at 1 South Grady Way, Renton (the “Red Lion Site”), from the property owner Renton  Hotel Investors, LLC (“RHI”); and   WHEREAS, the Red Lion Site is located within the City’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning  designation, and is subject to City of Renton Municipal Code, including City zoning, land use, and  business use and licensing regulations; and  WHEREAS, on or about April 9, 2020, in coordination with King County and under King  County’s lease with RHI, the Downtown Emergency Service Center (“DESC”) began using the Red  Lion Site as a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter for persons experiencing homelessness (the  “COVID‐19 Shelter”).  DESC began using the COVID‐19 Shelter to temporarily house individuals  previously housed at its downtown Seattle Main Shelter, located at The Morrison Hotel. DESC  and King County decided to house these individuals in private rooms, rather than congregate  housing, where COVID‐19 could spread more rapidly.  DESC did so without coordinating with City  officials or City staff, and without obtaining City permits or obtaining a City business license; and   AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  WHEREAS, as described by DESC, the COVID‐19 Shelter operates as a 24‐hour shelter for  DESC’s clients experiencing homelessness, with a wide range of services including the provision  of meals, case management, and crisis intervention; and    WHEREAS, King County has represented that the maximum number of residents of the  COVID‐19 Shelter has been 235 individuals; and  WHEREAS, DESC has been continuously operating the COVID‐19 Shelter since on or about  April 9, 2020, in concert with King County, in contravention of City zoning and without City land  use or building permits or a City business license; and  WHEREAS, since the COVID‐19 Shelter began operating at the Red Lion Site, first  responders from the Renton Police Department and the Renton Regional Fire Authority have  experienced a marked increase in the numbers of calls for service to the Red Lion Site and its  vicinity, causing adverse impacts in the City of Renton; and  WHEREAS, City staff immediately made the following land use and zoning determinations  regarding DESC’s use of the Red Lion Site to deintensify congregate homeless shelters:  (1) the  only land use lawfully established on the Red Lion Site is a “Hotel” land use; (2) the COVID‐19  Shelter does not meet the Renton Municipal Code’s (RMC’s) definition of a “Hotel” land use (RMC  4‐11‐080); (3) a “deintensification shelter” is not among the list of land use types that is  recognized in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4‐2‐060 (Zoning Use Table)); and (4) the  potentially comparable land uses that are recognized in the Renton Municipal Code are  “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” or “congregate residence,” and that neither  of those land uses is allowed within the Red Lion Site’s Commercial Arterial (“CA”) zoning  designation.  These determinations caused City staff to determine that the continued use of the  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  Red Lion Site to house a homeless shelter operation is not an allowed land use on the Red Lion  Site; and  WHEREAS, City staff also immediately determined that the COVID‐19 Shelter had opened  without King County, DESC, or RHI having first applied for a City business license for the COVID‐ 19 Shelter operations, in violation of RMC 5‐5‐3; and   WHEREAS, despite City staff’s determinations that the COVID‐19 Shelter is not an allowed  land use on the Red Lion Site and was operating without a required City business license, the City  was willing to temporarily forbear on taking code enforcement action against the COVID‐19  Shelter if King County would enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the City  regarding the operations of the COVID‐19 Shelter and the duration of the COVID‐19 Shelter’s  operations at the Red Lion Site.  Accordingly, the City provided a draft MOU to King County in  April 2020, and proceeded to negotiate in good faith with King County regarding an MOU, but  King County would not agree to any MOU that committed King County or DESC to a timeframe  for relocating the COVID‐19 Shelter’s operations from the Red Lion Site to another location within  or beyond City of Renton limits that would allow for such a use under the Renton Municipal Code;  and  WHEREAS, on June 30, 2020, when the MOU negotiations had dissolved with no  commitment on the part of King County or DESC to relocating the COVID‐19 Shelter to a location  allowed by the Renton Municipal Code, the City had run out of alternatives to engaging in code  enforcement proceedings regarding the COVID‐19 Shelter.  Thus, on that date, the City issued a  two‐count Finding of Violation to King County, DESC, and RHI under code enforcement case  number CODE20‐000321 finding that (1) the COVID‐19 Shelter is a “land use not allowed in zoning  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  designation” (Violation 1), and (2) the COVID‐19 Shelter was “operating without a City of Renton  business license” (Violation 2).  Hereinafter, the Finding of Violation is the “FOV;” and  WHEREAS, King County and RHI both timely requested a hearing to challenge the FOV,  and the requested hearing regarding the FOV was held before the City’s Hearing Examiner on  August 14, 2020, with DESC also participating in the hearing; and  WHEREAS, in front of the Hearing Examiner, King County, RHI, and DESC took the position  that the temporary use of the Red Lion Site for shelter deintensification meets the RMC definition  of a “Hotel” land use.  They also took the position that even if the shelter deintensification use of  the Red Lion Site did not meet the definition of a “Hotel” land use, the Local Health Officer’s  authority under Washington law to protect the public from contagious diseases takes legal  precedence over and preempts Renton’s zoning and permitting laws; and  WHEREAS, for its part, in front of the Hearing Examiner, the City took the positions that  (1) the deintensification use of the Red Lion Site does not meet the RMC definition of a “Hotel”  land use, (2) the use appeared to most closely align with the RMC definitions for the “diversion  facility / diversion interim service facility” land use or the “congregate residence” land use, (3)  neither the “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” land use nor the “congregate  residence” land use is allowed within the CA zoning designation (which is the Red Lion Site’s  zoning designation), and (4) the pandemic and County Health Order did not preempt the City’s  zoning and land use laws; indeed, the County Health Order expressly restricted King County to  using “legally available” resources and forbade using “illegal means or behavior,” which would  include the City of Renton’s legally adopted and enforced zoning, land use, and business licensing  laws; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  WHEREAS, by written decisions dated August 31, 2020 and October 2, 2020, the Hearing  Examiner ruled on the FOV (collectively, the “Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision”); and  WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision directed King County and DESC to choose  either to vacate the Red Lion Site within 60 days or to apply to the City for an “unclassified use”  interpretation in which the Department of Community & Economic Development (“CED”) would  determine if the COVID‐19 Shelter is allowed utilizing the criteria in RMC 4‐2‐050.C.6.a; and  WHEREAS, although the October 2, 2020 portion of the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision  confirms that the “unclassified use analysis . . . decision is left to City staff as governed by City  code,” the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision nevertheless projects that the outcome of CED’s  unclassified use interpretation will be to deem the COVID‐19 Shelter a “Hotel” land use, a “Social  Service Organizations” land use, or a combination of the two; and   WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision’s projections that an unclassified use  interpretation would result in a “Hotel” and/or “Social Service Organizations” land use  determination were based, in part, on the following assumptions regarding the intent of the City  Council:   Regarding the “Hotel” land use, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision states:    “The City has taken the strong position that the requirement in the hotel definition  that guest stays be “transient” means that stays must be 30 days or less. Although  the vast majority of hotel use may very well be 30 days or less, there is no basis to  conclude that hotels stays will not sometimes be longer due to exceptional  circumstances such as natural disasters and pandemics. The most compelling  reason to disagree with the City’s 30‐day interpretation is simply that the Renton  City Council didn’t expressly adopt a 30‐day limit for hotel stays. If the Council  wanted a hard and fast rule on the length of time that someone could stay in a  hotel room, it would have been exceptionally easy and clear to throw that into the  definition of hotel or transient.”  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  Cite:  Hearing Examiner’s August 31, 2020 decision, page 11, lines 22‐29 (emphasis  added).   Regarding the “Social Services Organizations” land use, the Hearing Examiner’s  FOV Decision states:  “There is the argument to be made that added night shelter use [to a “Social Services  Organizations” use which only expressly allows “day shelter” use] could reduce the  impacts of a day shelter and thereby make a conditional use permit unnecessary. A  day shelter causes displacement of a homeless population every evening it shuts  down whereas a 24‐hour shelter does not. However, it is too implausible to conclude  that’s why the social services organization expressly authorizes just day shelters and  doesn’t mention night shelters. If the Council considered a night shelter a more  benign use than a day shelter, it would have expressly authorized it as a permitted  use elsewhere in the use table.”  Cite:  Hearing Examiner’s August 31, 2020 decision, page 11, lines 11‐18 (emphasis  added); and  WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision’s projections that an unclassified use  interpretation would result in a “Hotel” and/or “Social Service Organizations” land use caused, in  part, the Hearing Examiner to conclude that the COVID‐19 Shelter was not most similar to a  “Diversion Facility / Diversion Interim Service Facility” land use; and  WHEREAS, on or about October 15, 2020, King County, DESC, and RHI jointly applied for  an unclassified use interpretation for the COVID‐19 Shelter, as provided for in the Hearing  Examiner’s FOV Decision (the “Unclassified Use Request”); and  WHEREAS, an unclassified use interpretation application is not a permit application type  that vests upon submittal of a complete application (See RMC 4‐1‐045 “Vesting”); and  WHEREAS, on or about October 23, 2020, King County, DESC, and RHI jointly commenced  a lawsuit in King County Superior Court, under Cause No. 20‐2‐15681‐7 KNT, challenging the  Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision (hereinafter, the “Renton Shelter Lawsuit”); and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation of all parties to the Renton Shelter Lawsuit, the  Renton Shelter Lawsuit’s case schedule was extended by 90 days with the first deadline in the  action now postponed until January 28, 2021; and    WHEREAS, impacts from the COVID‐19 Shelter at the Red Lion Site have created concerns  and identified impacts from neighboring property owners, business owners, residents, tenants,  and visitors regarding the compatibility between the COVID‐19 Shelter and land uses within its  vicinity; and  WHEREAS, this incompatibility became immediately apparent upon the COVID‐19  Shelter’s opening when its operators enclosed the building in security fencing as a measure it  asserted was necessary due to the behavior of its residents and covered the Red Lion hotel’s  signs, making a hotel building located at a primary entrance to the City’s core to appear to be a  vacant and/or cordoned off building; and  WHEREAS, activities of COVID‐19 Shelter residents and the operation and oversight of the  COVID‐19 Shelter have created and continue to create significant public safety and welfare  concerns for the occupants of the COVID‐19 Shelter and surrounding residents, businesses, and  visitors. These public safety and welfare concerns include, but are not limited to dramatically  increased criminal activity, violations of building and fire codes, dramatically increased 9‐1‐1 calls  for emergency services, and threats to the safety of first responders who respond to 9‐1‐1 calls;  and   WHEREAS, the conduct of residents at the COVID‐19 Shelter has led to the Renton  Regional Fire Authority to request police safety escorts to all calls for service that it responds to,  something that does not occur with typical hotel patrons; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9  WHEREAS, the COVID‐19 Shelter residents are at a high risk for interpersonal conflicts  and many have histories of violence, rule violations, and/or illegal substance use that cause other  shelters to deny them services; and    WHEREAS, the COVID‐19 Shelter operators assert that the incidence of such conflicts  have reduced as a result of deintensifying the distance from which the residents live and interact  with each other. Nevertheless, the number of interpersonal conflicts that include threats and  acts of violence (including arson) remains continually high; and    WHEREAS, repeated incidents of arson and threats of arson have highlighted the  significant risks posed by COVID‐19 Shelter residents’ repeated fire code violations; and   WHEREAS, risks of interpersonal conflicts and the related risks posed to COVID‐19 Shelter  residents and first responders are likely to be reduced by further reducing the number of  residents who are prone to interpersonal conflicts living within the same vicinity; and  WHEREAS, reducing the density of the COVID‐19 Shelter’s occupancy and number of  residents who have contributed to dramatically increased levels of criminal and other unsafe  activity and consistently reacted confrontationally to first responders is likely to improve the  safety of shelter residents, staff, visitors, first responders, and those working, living, and visiting  the surrounding vicinity; and  WHEREAS, in response to the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision, the City Council wishes  to legislatively clarify and confirm its policy and interpretation regarding “Hotel,” “Social Service  Organizations,” and “Division Facility / Diversion Interim Service Facility” land uses, to apply city‐ wide; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the amended and clarified definition of “Hotel,” as  set forth in Section IX below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent, including adding the WAC  458‐20‐166(3) definition of “transient” to the definition of “Hotel” to mean “for less than one  month, or less than thirty continuous days if the rental period does not begin on the first day of  the month;” and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that adding a definition for “Hotel, Extended  Stay,” as set forth in Section IX below, further clarifies and codifies the intent of the City Council;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the amended definition of “Social Services  Organizations,” as set forth in Section X below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent, including  confirming that “night shelter” operations are not an allowed component of a Social Service  Organizations land use; and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the amended definition of “Diversion  Facility” and the removal of the definition of “Diversion Interim Service Facility,” as set forth in  Section VIII below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent; and  WHEREAS, the City Council also finds that there is a need to adopt certain related  clarifications to the Renton Municipal Code regarding the unclassified use interpretation process,  the distinctions between “principal” and “accessory” uses, and the title of positions within CED;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that pursuant to the Hearing Examiner’s FOV  Decision, the Renton Municipal Code does not currently allow the COVID‐19 Shelter to operate  within the City’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning district; and   AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  11  WHEREAS, therefore, in addition to clarifying the Renton Municipal Code in response to  the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision, the City Council has legislatively determined that it will  amend the Renton Municipal Code to add a definition for a “COVID‐19 deintensification shelter”  land use and to allow a single such land use within the City without need for a conditional use  permit, on a short‐term basis coextensive with the effective period of this ordinance and subject  to additional standards and regulations established in this ordinance; and  WHEREAS, City staff has concluded that there are available properties in the City of  Renton in the following zoning designations upon which a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter  could be located after the completion of tenant improvements to the shelter operator’s  satisfaction:  Light Industrial (IL), Medium Industrial (IM), Heavy Industrial (IH), Center Village  (CV), and Commercial Office (CO); and  WHEREAS, City staff has not been advised and is unaware that King County, DESC, or RHI  has inquired into or otherwise determined whether a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter could  be located on any properties in the Light Industrial, Medium Industrial, Heavy Industrial, Center  Village, or Commercial Office zones, either with or without tenant improvements, and the  identification and acquisition of one or more such properties could allow the COVID‐19  deintensification shelter to relocate and operate lawfully in an appropriate zone with appropriate  conditions and thus resolve the issues in the pending Renton Shelter Lawsuit and issues over use  of the Red Lion Site as a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter; and  WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to further consider the issue of whether COVID‐19  deintensification shelters may operate within the City of Renton after the effective period of this  ordinance, and it is the City Council’s desire to have City staff further investigate the matter; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  12  WHEREAS, meanwhile, the City Council recognizes that the homelessness crisis in King  County is a serious regional challenge but that it is a regional challenge that predates the COVID‐ 19 pandemic; and  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that one of the ways that the City can help combat the  homelessness crisis that predated the COVID‐19 pandemic is to expressly allow for homeless  services land uses within the City and to provide for reasonable regulation of such uses; and   WHEREAS, in response, the City Council has determined to, on an emergency and interim  basis, define “homeless services use” land uses, state the zoning designations in which such land  uses are allowed, and establish regulations to be applied to such uses.  During the interim period  in which this ordinance is in effect, it is the City Council’s desire to have City staff further study  options for regulating homeless services uses; and  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a need to adopt this ordinance as an interim  zoning control ordinance on an emergency basis; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to WAC 197‐11‐880, the adoption of this interim zoning ordinance is  exempt from the requirements of a threshold determination under the State Environmental  Policy Act (SEPA), and future permanent zoning regulations shall be reviewed in accordance with  SEPA requirements; and  WHEREAS, the City Council expressly intends that this ordinance be a legislative policy  action which is not a site‐specific or quasi‐judicial action, and the City Council further recognizes  and intends that such legislative action has the effect of mooting the Unclassified Use Request  by King County, RHI, and DESC and mooting the Renton Shelter Lawsuit by creating an allowed  use for the COVID‐19 Shelter that moots the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  13  WHEREAS, the City Council expressly intends that procedural and substantive due process  rights be met in the substance and contents of and process of adopting this ordinance; and  WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on November 23, 2020, regarding the  subject matter of this ordinance, and heard oral testimony on the matter and considered written  comments received prior to the public hearing; and  WHEREAS, the City Council encouraged further public input on the subject matter of this  ordinance by keeping the public hearing open until December 1, 2020 at 5:00 PM for the purpose  of receiving additional written comment; and  WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered numerous written comments  submitted by members of the public; and  WHEREAS, in response to public comment, the City Council wishes to clarify that, as  described in the written presentation materials included in the City Council’s November 23, 2020  agenda packet, the City’s intention regarding the timing of this ordinance has been as follows:     November 23, 2020:  Public hearing;   December 7, 2020:  First reading of the ordinance with revisions that incorporate  feedback from public comments; and   December 14, 2020:  Second reading of the ordinance, City Council action on the  ordinance, and effective date of the ordinance;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. The above recitals are adopted as findings of fact in support of this interim  zoning control ordinance adopted herein pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  14  interpretative and applicable judicial decisions, and are found to be true and correct in all  respects.  SECTION II. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐2‐050.A, 4‐2‐050.C.4, 4‐2‐050.C.5, and 4‐2‐050.C.6 of the  Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐050 remain in  effect and unchanged.  4‐2‐050 PERMITTED LAND USES ESTABLISHED:  A. CATEGORIES OF USES ESTABLISHED:  This Section establishes permitted, conditional, accessory and prohibited uses,  by zone, for all properties within the Renton City Limits. All uses in a given zone  are one of six (6) types:  PERMITTED USES: Land uses allowed outright within a zone as a principal use.  Permitted uses are distinct from other uses listed separately in RMC 4‐2‐060,  Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations and/or as defined.   CONDITIONAL USES (ADMINISTRATIVE): Land uses which may be permitted  as a principal use within a zoning district following review by the Development  Services Division Director Administrator to establish conditions mitigating impacts  of the use and to assure compatibility with other uses in the district.  CONDITIONAL USES (HEARING EXAMINER): Land uUses with special  characteristics that may not generally be appropriate within a zoning district, but  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  15  may be permitted as a principal use subject to review by the Hearing Examiner to  establish conditions to protect public health, safety and welfare.  ACCESSORY USES: Uses customarily incidental and subordinate to the a  principal use and located within the same structure as the principal use or  otherwise upon the same lot site occupied by the a principal use or on an  abutting/adjacent lot that is under the same ownership as the principal lot. Some  accessory uses are specifically listed, particularly where a use is only allowed in an  accessory form, whereas other accessory uses are determined by the  Development Services Division Administrator on a case‐by‐case basis per RMC 4‐ 2‐050C4 and C6, Accessory Use Interpretations and Unclassified Uses.  PROHIBITED USES: Any use which is not specifically enumerated or  interpreted by the City as allowable in that district. Any use not specifically listed  as a permitted, conditional, or accessory use is prohibited, except those uses  determined to be unclassified and permitted by the Development Services  Division Director  Administrator pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐0404‐2‐050C6. Any  prohibited use is illegal and is a misdemeanor punishable under RMC 1‐3‐1,  Penalties.  UNCLASSIFIED USE: A use which does not appear in a list of permitted,  conditionally permitted, or accessory uses, but which is interpreted by the  Development Services Division Director Administrator as similar to a listed  permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory use, and not otherwise  prohibited, pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐050C6, Unclassified Uses.   AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  16  B. ZONING USE TABLES ESTABLISHED:  The following tables establish whether a specific use is permitted in a zoning  district and whether the use is allowed as “permitted,” “conditional,” or  “accessory” use. The zone is located on the horizontal row and the specific use is  located on the vertical column of these tables.  C. INTERPRETATION OF ZONING USE TABLES:  1. Legend: The following letters have the following meanings when they  appear in the box at the intersection of the column and the row:  P Permitted Use  AD Conditional Use – Administrative  H Conditional Use – Hearing  Examiner  AC Accessory Use  2. Other Requirements Applicable: The above uses are subject to the  review procedures specified in chapter 4‐9 RMC, Permits – Specific, the  development standards of chapters 4‐3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay  Districts, 4‐4, City‐Wide Property Development Standards, and 4‐6, Street and  Utility Standards, and may be subject to additional conditions as noted in  subsection C3 of this Section. The Aquifer Protection Regulations of RMC 4‐3‐050,  Critical Areas Regulations, further restrict usage of those properties located within  the Aquifer Protection Area Boundary shown in RMC 4‐3‐050Q, Maps.  3. Additional Use‐Related Conditions: If a number also appears at the  intersection of the column and the row, the use is also subject to the additional  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  17  requirements as listed immediately following the use table in RMC 4‐2‐080,  Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables. All applicable requirements shall  govern a use whether specifically identified in this Chapter or not.  4. Accessory Use Interpretations: The Development Services Division  Director Administrator mayshall determine if an unclassified use or a classified  use, even if not specifically listed as accessory (AC), is permitted as an accessory  use in a zone. Upon inquiry written application by an applicant, an administrative  interpretation shall be made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator to determine if a proposed use is allowed as an accessory use  utilizing the rules of interpretation in subsection C4a of this Section. If the  applicant does not concur with the interpretation of whether a use is accessory or  with the permit type applied to a use, appeal may be made pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐ 110, Appeals. Interpretations made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall be documented, and updates to Title 4, when consistent with  the title format and level of detail, shall incorporate “accessory use”  interpretations upon approval by the legislative authority.  a. Rules of Interpretation for Accessory Uses: To determine whether  a use is permitted as accessory, the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall utilize the following rules of interpretation:  i. If a use is allowed or conditionally allowed in a zone as a  “permitted” use, accessory uses associated with the primary use that are  determined to be incidental, necessary and commonly found with the permitted  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  18  use may be allowed with the same permit type as the primary use, unless  specifically stated otherwise.  ii. If a use is permitted or conditionally permitted as a primary use,  subject to location restrictions, the listed use, even as an accessory use, is also  subject to the same location restrictions as the primary use, unless specifically  stated otherwise. For example, if a use is restricted to a location within the  Employment Area (EA) land use designation, then the accessory form of the use is  only permitted in the EA, unless specifically stated otherwise.  iii. Required parking, required site utilities/facilities, and other  development standards required in order to establish or operate a use on a site  according to the RMC are considered accessory.  5. Prohibited Uses: If no symbol appears in the box at the intersection of  the column and the row, the use is prohibited in that district unless otherwise  determined by the Development Services Division Director Administrator,  pursuant to this subsection C6 of this Section, Unclassified Uses, or subsection C4,  Accessory Use Interpretations.  6. Unclassified Uses: Upon inquirywritten application by an applicant, an  administrative interpretation shall be made by the Development Services Division  Director Administrator to determine if a proposed use, not specifically listed, is  allowed utilizing the criteria in subsection C6a of this Section. Should  interpretation be made that a proposed, unlisted use not be allowed in a specific  zoning district, the Director Administrator shall indicate which zones, if any, do  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  19  permit the use subject to locational restrictions and development standards. If the  Development Services Division Director’s Administrator’s interpretation indicates  that an unlisted use is not consistent with the permitted, conditional or accessory  uses in any district, or if a party does not concur with the permit type applied to a  use, appeal may be made to the City’s Hearing Examiner pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐ 110, Appeals. Interpretations made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall be documented, and updates to Title 4 shall be updated , when  consistent with the title format and level of detail, shallto incorporate respond to  “unclassified use” interpretations upon approval by the legislative authoritymade  by the Administrator.  a. Criteria for Unclassified Uses: In order to make a determination that  an unclassified use is permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory, the  Development Services Division Director Administrator must find that the use is:  i. In keeping with the purpose and intent of the zone, and  consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and other adopted plans  as may be applicable; and  ii. Similar in nature to, and no more intense than, a specifically  listed permitted, conditional or accessory use; and  iii. Consistent with subsection C4 of this Section, if determined to  be permissible as an accessory use.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  20  7. Use Table Conflicts: In the event of a conflict between RMC 4‐2‐060, the  Master Zoning Use Table and any other individual zoning use tables, RMC 4‐2‐ 070A through 4‐2‐070S, the provisions of RMC 4‐2‐060 shall have priority.  8. Existing Legal Nonconforming Uses: Where the term “existing” follows  a listed use type within the table(s) (e.g., horticulture nurseries, existing), then  those who can document that their nonconforming uses were legal at the time  the nonconforming uses were established will be permitted to continue those  nonconforming uses and given all the rights of other permitted uses within the  district. In addition, these uses may be rebuilt “as is, where is” should they suffer  damage. These uses may be remodeled without limitation on value and may be  enlarged subject to current code requirements (e.g., height limits, lot coverage,  density limits, setbacks, parking, etc.), unless otherwise specifically conditioned in  RMC 4‐2‐080.  SECTION IV. Subsection 4‐2‐060.G of the Renton Municipal Code is amended by  modifying one row and adding two rows, and 4‐2‐060.K of the Renton Municipal Code is  amended by adding one row, all as shown in Attachment A. All other provisions in 4‐2‐060 remain  in effect and unchanged.  SECTION V. Subsections 4‐2‐080.A.71 and 4‐2‐080.A.101 of the Renton Municipal Code  are amended as shown below.  All other provisions in 4‐2‐080.A remain in effect and unchanged.  71.    Specified use(s) are only allowed south of I‐405. Diversion facilities  shall be limited to serving no more than one hundred (100) individuals at any time.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  21  101. Reserved.As many as one (1) COVID‐19 deintensification shelter  may operate within the City of Renton without obtaining a conditional use permit  to operate as a Homeless Services Use.  The following applies to a COVID‐19  deintensification shelter operating pursuant to this exemption from the conditional  use permit requirements that would otherwise apply to a Homeless Services Use:  a. After June 1, 2021, the COVID‐19 deintensification shelter shall not serve  more than one hundred twenty‐five (125) persons at any time; and  b. The COVID‐19 deintensification shelter shall cease operations no later  than January 1, 2022, after which date the COVID‐19 deintensification shelter will  be unlawfully operating if it does not hold a valid conditional use permit for a  Homeless Services Use and is not operating in a location in which Homeless  Services Uses are allowed.   SECTION VI. Chapter 4‐4 RMC of the Renton Municipal Code is amended to add Section  4‐4‐045, Homeless Services Use, to read as shown below.  4‐4‐045 HOMELESS SERVICES USE:  A. PURPOSE:  The purpose of this Section is to provide zoning and land use regulations for  homeless services uses that are proposed to or that do primarily provide shelter  to one or more populations of people experiencing or transitioning from  homelessness.  B. APPLICABILITY:  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  22  This Section applies to all homeless services uses, except as expressly set forth  in this Section. This Section does not apply to:  1. Uses allowed under a Temporary Use Permit issued pursuant to the  terms of RMC 4‐9‐240, Temporary Use Permits; and uses temporarily allowed  pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐060.G and 4‐2‐080.A.101 (including a COVID‐19  deintensification shelter);  2. Religious organizations hosting the homeless within buildings on their  property under the terms of RCW 35A.21.360 (Hosting the homeless by religious  organizations – When authorized  – Requirements – Prohibitions on local actions);   3. Social service organizations; and  4. Unrelated individuals living together as a “family” pursuant to the  definition contained in RMC 4‐11‐060.  C. DEFINITIONS:  1. Definitions Applicable to Terminology Used in This Section:  See also  Definitions in RMC chapter 4‐11.  a. “Code of conduct” is an agreement on rules of behavior between  occupants of a homeless services use and operators and providers offering a  homeless services use at a specific location. The code of conduct is intended to  protect the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants and employees of the  homeless services use, and the surrounding residents and businesses.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  23  b. “Funder” means any person, partnership, corporation, or other  organization of any kind that provides funding to establish, construct, or operate  a homeless services use.  c. “Good neighbor agreement (GNA).”  Reserved.  d. “Homeless services use.”   See definition in RMC 4‐11‐080.  e. “Homelessness” refers to the state of a person or group of persons  who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, meaning: (i) Has a  primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not meant for human  habitation; (ii) Is living in a publicly or privately operated shelter designated to  provide temporary living arrangements (including congregate shelters,  transitional housing, and hotels and motels paid for by charitable organizations or  by federal, state, and local government programs); or (iii) Is exiting an institution  where (s)he/it has resided for ninety (90) days or less and who resided in an  emergency shelter or place not meant for human habitation immediately before  entering that institution.  f. “Operator” means any person, partnership, business, corporation,  or other organization of any kind that proposes to site and operate or does  operate a homeless services use in the City.  g. “Provider” means any person, partnership, business, corporation,  or other organization of any kind that provides supportive services to a homeless  population accessing a homeless services use.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  24  h. “Safety and security plan” refers to a plan developed by the  operator and updated to reflect input provided by the Renton Police Department  to address security concerns regarding a homeless services use that is proposed  at a specific location.  i. “Standard operating procedures” refer to a plan developed by the  operator that addresses the elements required by subsection F.2.e of this Section.  The elements contained in the standard operating procedures plan would  generally be applicable to all homeless services uses in Renton irrespective of  where they are proposed to be located.  j. “Supportive services” are those provided to occupants of a homeless  services use for the purpose of facilitating their independence and include, but are  not limited to, services such as case management, food or meals, medical  treatment, psychological counseling, childcare, transportation, and job training.  D. APPROVAL PROCESS REQUIRED:  A homeless services use requires a  conditional use permit, approved by a Hearing Examiner and processed pursuant  to the provisions of RMC 4‐9‐030 and the provisions of this Section.    E. PRE‐APPLICATION PROCESS:  1. Pre‐application Materials: Shall be submitted to the Department  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐100 before a permit application for a homeless services use  may be filed. In addition to standard pre‐application submittal (see RMC 4‐8‐ 100.A), materials for homeless services uses pre‐applications shall include:  a. Name of the operator;  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  25  b. Statement of experience operating the type of homeless services  use that is proposed or any other relevant experience;   c. Statement of homeless population to be served and occupancy  target for each homeless services use proposed;   d. Data provided by the applicant describing the extent to which the  proposed homeless population requires shelter and/or supportive services;  e. Whether the applicant intends to seek funding for the proposed  homeless services use from the City or from a regional coalition for housing;  f. Demonstrated experience of the operator at running successful  homeless services for the homeless population that is intended to be served;  g. The draft safety and security plan that has undergone preliminary  review and incorporated feedback from the Renton Police Department; and  h. Any additional documentation submitted by the applicant for the  pre‐application meeting and written public comments received on the proposal  through completion of the pre‐application neighborhood meeting required by  subsection E.2 of this Section.  2. Pre‐application Neighborhood Meeting: Prior to submittal of pre‐ application materials, the applicant shall hold a public informational meeting  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A, Neighborhood Meetings. The purpose of this meeting  is to provide an early, open dialogue between the applicant, the operator, and  property owners surrounding the proposed homeless services use. The meeting  should acquaint the surrounding property owners with the operator and provide  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  26  for an exchange of information about the proposal and the community where the  use is proposed to be located. The operator shall share information regarding its  intended permit application (e.g., the draft standard operating procedures, draft  code of conduct, and draft safety and security plan) for the proposed homeless  services use. The surrounding property owners should share characteristics of the  surrounding community and any issues or concerns of which the operator should  be made aware. Notice of the neighborhood meeting shall be provided by the  Administrator pursuant to the requirements of RMC 4‐8‐090.A, Neighborhood  Meetings.  3. Pre‐application Site Inspection by the City: If the applicant proposes to  use an existing structure to house a homeless services use, a pre‐application site  inspection by City staff shall be required. The applicant shall allow for an  inspection of the structure proposed to house a homeless services use by staff  representatives of the Community Services Department, the Department’s  Planning Division, the Building Official, the Police Department, and the Fire  Marshal. The purpose of the inspection is to preliminarily determine if the facility  meets the Building and Fire Code standards for the proposed use. The purpose of  this inspection is not to ensure that a facility meets the requirements of this Code  or to force an applicant to bring a proposed facility up to applicable standards  prior to project approval. The inspection is intended to inform the applicant, the  operator, the City, the underlying property owner, and the public of applicable  building modifications that would be necessary to establish a homeless services  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  27  use prior to making an application.  Code deficiencies that are not discovered or  recognized during this inspection shall not excuse the applicant from later  compliance with all applicable City, County, State, and Federal law requirements.     F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:  1. An applicant seeking to establish a homeless services use is required to  submit application materials that meet the submittal requirements for a  conditional use permit as required by RMC 4‐8‐120.  2. In addition to the applicable conditional use permit submittal  requirements identified in subsection F.1 of this Section, information identified in  this subsection shall also be included with the permit application. An application  that does not contain the information listed in this subsection shall not be  considered complete. All applications for homeless services use shall include the  following:  a. A description of the homeless population to be served by the  proposed homeless services use, dates and times of operation, and associated  occupancy targets.  b. A statement of the operator’s experience at providing homeless  services, including examples of similar facilities managed by the operator.  c. A list of transit stops and park and rides within one‐half (0.5) mile of  the proposed homeless services use.  d. A list of job retraining and education uses within one‐half mile (0.5)  of the proposed homeless services use.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  28  e. A standard operating procedures plan including, but not limited to:  i. A description of how the proposed homeless services use will  serve the homeless population that will be accommodated by the use;  ii. A description of staffing for the proposed homeless services use  based on anticipated population size and needs and the training provided to staff  hired to fulfill the identified staffing demand;  iii. A description of the anticipated providers that will serve the  population that will be accommodated by the homeless services use;  iv. A description of the known funders for the homeless services  use;  v. A description of the procedures used to manage intake of the  homeless population that is proposed to be served;  vi. A plan for encouraging prospective occupants to provide  personal identification for inclusion in the Homeless Management Information  System (HMIS) to help increase opportunities to provide access to housing and  services and to secure public funding for the proposed homeless services use;  vii. Where appropriate and feasible, a plan for developing a  community service model that is tailored to the homeless population to be served  at the location where the homeless services use is proposed to be located. A  community service model is intended to provide a framework for persons  experiencing homelessness to work volunteer service hours within the scope of  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  29  their ability in the community where they are receiving support from a homeless  services use;  viii. Where applicable, a plan to ensure that school‐aged residents  of the use are enrolled in school during their stay;  ix. Identification of a primary point of operator contact for  assistance and referrals to send homeless individuals seeking services;  x. A plan for managing exterior appearance of the proposed  homeless services use, including trash/litter, hazardous materials, and biohazards  on the property of the use and surrounding sidewalks;  xi. A description of how the operator will inform and educate  occupants of the homeless services use regarding the code of conduct; and  xii. A description of consequences to be imposed for violating the  code of conduct.  f. A code of conduct that applies within the homeless services use site  to all individuals granted access to the proposed homeless services use including,  but not limited to:  i. Respect the rights of property owners to restrict access to areas  of their property that are not open to the public;  ii. Maintain the site in a safe and habitable condition;  iii.  Do not possess or use illegal substances;  iv. Respect state law restrictions on smoking and use designated  smoking areas where provided; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  30  v. Comply with City of Renton regulations governing public  conduct (including but not limited to the prohibition on public camping, loitering,  trespassing,  littering, creating a nuisance, etc.).  g. A safety and security plan describing measures that the operator  will employ to promote the safety of shelter occupants and surrounding residents  and businesses, including but not limited to:  i. Criteria for rejection or removal of an individual seeking access  to the proposed homeless services use;  ii. A plan for deployment (including time, place and manner) of  security patrols;  iii. A plan to address disruptive behavior exhibited by clients of the  homeless services use provider within a homeless services use and its site that  infringes on the safety of occupants or employees of the use, and a description of  the consequences for engaging in disruptive behavior;  iv. A plan for preventing loitering, creating a nuisance, and  unpermitted camping associated with the homeless services use;  v. Implementation of registered sex offender background checks  and compliance with applicable registration and notification requirements;  vi. A plan for managing individuals excluded from accessing the  proposed homeless services use;  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  31  vii. A plan for coordination between the operator, public safety  officers (e.g., police, fire, etc.), and any private security forces employed by  surrounding property and business owners to ensure timely information sharing;  viii. Provision of a phone number, email address, and point of  contact at the site of the proposed homeless services use for the community to  report concerns;  ix. A plan for addressing reported concerns and documenting  resolution, and sharing this information with relevant neighbors, as applicable to  the concern; and  x. Identification of performance metrics that will be used to track  compliance with the safety and security plan.  h. Neighborhood meeting materials, for both the Pre‐application  Neighborhood Meeting and the Neighborhood Meeting, as required by RMC 4‐8‐ 120.   G. GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENT PROCESS REQUIRED:   Reserved.  H. CITY APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMELESS SERVICES USES:  1. Applicability of City Review Process: A homeless services use requires  approval of a conditional use permit by a Hearing Examiner.  The conditional use  permit shall be reviewed pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐030 as enhanced by the provisions  of this Section.  2. Decision Criteria Applicable to Conditional Use Permits for a Homeless  Services Use: The City may deny, approve, or approve with conditions a  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  32  conditional use permit application for a homeless services use if the applicant  demonstrates that:  a. The proposal complies with the conditional use permit decision  criteria of RMC 4‐9‐030.D;  b. The proposal complies with the applicable requirements of the  RMC;  c. The proposal includes a standard operating procedures plan  meeting the requirements of subsection F.2.e of this Section;  d. The proposal includes a code of conduct meeting the requirements  of subsection F.2.f of this Section;  e. The proposal includes a safety and security plan meeting the  requirements of subsection F.2.g of this Section and incorporating the feedback  provided by the Renton Police Department; and  f. The proposal addresses all applicable design guidelines and  development standards of this Section and any applicable land use district overlay  in a manner which fulfills their purpose and intent.  3. Minimum required notice and public engagement procedures for  homeless services uses shall include the following:  a. Notice of the pre‐application neighborhood meeting shall be provided  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A;  b. A neighborhood meeting shall be held pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A on  all applications to establish a homeless services use. Prior to the neighborhood  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  33  meeting, the operator shall meet and confer with the Renton Police Department  regarding the proposed safety and security plan described in the submittal  materials as required by subsection F.2.g of this Section. At the neighborhood  meeting, a representative of the homeless services use operator shall present in  writing and describe the proposed safety and security plan, and any input or  comments received on the plan from the Renton Police Department.  c. Notice of an application to establish any homeless services use shall be  provided pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090;  4. Administrator’s Recommendation:  a. A written report of the Administrator shall be prepared in response  to the approval criteria and public comment.  b. Notice of Availability of the Administrator’s Recommendation:  Notice of the availability of the Administrator’s recommendation shall be provided  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.  5. Modifications to a Homeless Services Use: Conditions of approval for  a homeless services use apply for the life of the project. Any increase in the  number of beds beyond that applied for by the applicant and included in the City  approval, or changes to the population served by the homeless services use, shall  be considered a major modification and processed as a new application.  I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/USE REQUIREMENTS:  1. General Development Requirements: The applicable general  development requirements of the zone shall be met unless specifically modified  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  34  by the terms of this Section when applied to a homeless services use.  If there is a  conflict between applicable general development requirements of the zone and  the terms of this Section when applied to a homeless services use, the terms of  this Section shall apply.  2. Parking Requirements: In addition to the terms of RMC 4‐4‐080, the  following requirements apply to all homeless services uses:  a. Number of Parking Stalls: Homeless services uses are unspecified  under the terms of RMC 4‐4‐080.F.10.d, and required parking stalls shall be  established by the Administrator and approved by the Hearing Examiner.  b. Overnight Camping is Prohibited: Camping is prohibited in areas  that provide accessory parking for the homeless services use.  3. Occupancy Limits and Size‐Related Development Standards:  a. All homeless services uses shall comply with occupancy limitations  contained in applicable building and fire codes and ordinances adopted by the  City.  b.  In addition to compliance with subsection I.3.a of this Section,  overnight shelter uses shall not provide sleeping accommodations for more than  one hundred (100) residents, and shall comply with the following additional  requirements:  i. The City shall impose a condition on any approved overnight  shelter use limiting the number of beds to those requested by the applicant or one  hundred (100), whichever is less.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  35  ii. Shelters shall locate greater than one‐half (0.5) mile from any  other homeless services use, unless they are co‐located as part of a single  development and do not serve more than a combined one hundred (100)  residents.  iii. Shelters with more than fifty (50) beds should locate within one  (1) mile of a public transit stop.  4. Minimum Requirements:  a. Homeless Services Uses in General:  i. Toilet, bathing, sleeping, laundry, and storage facilities to meet  the demands anticipated by the homeless services use provider.  ii. Access to WiFi for occupants of the homeless services use.  iii. Designated smoking areas located a minimum of twenty‐five   feet (25’) from perimeter property lines with appropriate cigarette disposal  facilities.  iv. Staffing provided during operating hours for each homeless  services use.  v. Designated and dignified privacy areas to meet the needs of the  anticipated homeless population that is proposed to be served (e.g., lactation  rooms, medical/counseling rooms, caseworker consultation spaces, etc.).  vi. A permanent address to meet the needs anticipated by the  homeless services use provider.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  36  viii. A final safety and security plan updated after and comments  have been received on the plan from the Renton Police Department.  b. Day Shelter Use: Access to electrical outlets to meet the demands  anticipated by the homeless population that is proposed to be served.  c. Overnight Shelter Use:  i. Overnight sleeping accommodations that do not exceed one  hundred (100) beds.  ii. A dedicated electrical outlet for every occupant of a bed.  J. ADDITIONAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:  1. Crime Deterrence: The design of any homeless services use shall  incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles  and use available technology to deter crime. Examples may include:  a. Visibility of entrance and exit points to and from any structure  housing a homeless services use;  b. Open and well‐lighted pedestrian connections between the  homeless services use, accessory parking, transit services and other supportive  services in the area; and  c. Video surveillance of entrance and exit points to and from any  structure housing a homeless services use.  2. Common Areas: Common areas shall be provided to enhance resident  enjoyment through inclusion of features such as libraries, roof decks, patios, and  gardens.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  37  K. MITIGATION MEASURES:  The City may impose conditions relating to the development, design, use, or  operation of a homeless services use to mitigate environmental, public life, safety,  or welfare, or other identifiable impacts.  L. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW:  The applicant shall pay for independent technical review by a consultant  retained by the City for review of materials submitted by the applicant to  demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this Section.   SECTION VII. The definition of “COVID‐19 Deintensification Shelter” is added in  alphabetical order to Section 4‐11‐030 of the Renton Municipal Code as shown below. All other  definitions in Section 4‐11‐030 remain in effect and unchanged.  COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER:  A facility (whether a separate structure,  or situated inside or outside a building or a portion of a building) used for the  relocation of homelessness shelters and encampments for the purposes of de‐ intensifying or reducing density in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID‐19)  pandemic.  A COVID‐19 Deintensification Shelter that meets the definition of a  Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter is both a COVID‐19 Deintensification  Shelter and a Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter.  SECTION VIII. The definition of “Diversion Facility” in Section 4‐11‐040 of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended and the definition of “Diversion Interim Service Facility” in Section 4‐ 11‐040 of the Renton Municipal Code is removed, as shown below.  All other definitions in Section  4‐11‐040 remain in effect and unchanged.  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  38  DIVERSION FACILITY: A facility which that provides community crisis services,  whereby  inpatient healthcare for individuals that are self‐admitted or ordered,  diverted, or referred from jails, hospitals, doctors or other similar treatment  facilities or professionals, or by first responders, including law enforcement,  hospital emergency department social workers, and similar professionals. options  due to mental illness or chemical dependency.  Services may include an array of  inpatient healthcare treatment and support services including but not limited to  screening and assessment, psychological counseling, case management, crisis  management, detox services, substance use and trauma‐related treatment  services, behavioral/mental health care, medical isolation, care, or treatment,  counseling, respite services, and various levels of accommodations for sleeping  purposes. Some outpatient healthcare services may be provided. Not included in  this definition are congregate residences, assisted living facilities, adult family  homes, group homes, convalescent centers, social service organizations, or  homeless services uses.   DIVERSION INTERIM SERVICE FACILITY: A facility which provides interim or  respite services, such as temporary shelter, medical/mental health treatment,  case management or other support options such as transportation arrangements  for patients referred to such a facility from a diversion facility.  SECTION IX. The definition of “Hotel” in Section 4‐11‐080 of the Renton Municipal Code  is amended as shown below. The definitions of “Homeless Services Use” and “Hotel, Extended‐ AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  39  Stay” are added in alphabetical order to Section 4‐11‐080 of the Renton Municipal Code as shown  below. All other definitions in Section 4‐11‐080 remain in effect and unchanged.  HOMELESS SERVICES USE:  A day shelter or overnight shelter as defined below:  1. Day Shelter: A facility that offers a haven to people experiencing homelessness  by providing a safe place to rest during the day or evening, but with no overnight  stays. Support services for homeless populations is an integral part of a day shelter  use and includes but is not limited to access to food, seating, showers, laundry,  restrooms, storage, a computer lab, phones, fax, and a critical mailing address.  Spaces for meetings and examinations are generally provided to accommodate  counseling and access to medical/dental and legal assistance.  2. Overnight Shelter: Any facility that is operated for a long‐term and indefinite  period (and not in response to a single sudden event such as a natural disaster)  for the primary purpose of providing shelter for people experiencing  homelessness in general or for specific populations of people experiencing  homelessness. Supportive services may or may not be provided in addition to the  provision of shelter. A COVID‐19 deintensification shelter meeting this definition  is a Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter.  HOTEL: A building or portion thereof designed or used wherein a majority of the  net floor area is dedicated for the rental of rooms for transient occupancy rental  for sleeping purposes in exchange for payment, and typically based on a per night  and per room basis for no more than thirty (30) continuous days and not meeting  the definition of Homeless Services Use. For the purposes of this definition,  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  40  “transient” means less than one (1) month, or less than thirty (30) continuous days  if the rental period does not begin on the first day of the month.  Hotel structures  are at least two (2) stories in height, with lodging space generally above the first  floor. Lodging space may also be located on the first floor. Individual rooms are  typically accessed from a common hallway and include permanent provisions for  sanitation but do not provide kitchen facilities. A central commercial kitchen and  dining room catering to the hotel patrons may be provided, event space, eating  and drinking establishments, and accessory shops and services typically located in  or provided by hotels and catering to the general public may be provided. Not  included in this definition are facilities providing crisis intervention or case  management or both, multi‐family attached dwellings, bed and breakfasts, or  motels.   HOTEL, EXTENDED‐STAY: A building or portion thereof for rental of rooms with  permanent provisions for living, eating, sanitation, and cooking for temporary  occupancy without limits on duration. Extended‐stay hotel structures are at least  two (2) stories in height, with lodging space generally above the first floor, and not  meeting the definition of a Homeless Services Use. Lodging space may also be  located on the first floor. Individual rooms accessed from a common hallway. A  commercial kitchen and dining room catering to the extended‐stay patrons may  be provided; event space, eating and drinking establishments, and accessory  shops and services typically located in or provided by hotels or extended‐stay  hotels and catering to the general public may be provided. Not included in this  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  41  definition are facilities providing crisis intervention or case management or both,  attached dwellings, bed and breakfasts, hotels, or motels.  SECTION X. The definition of “Social Service Organizations” in Section 4‐11‐190 of the  Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other definitions in Section 4‐11‐190  remain in effect and unchanged.  SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS: Public or nonprofit agencies that provide  counseling, therapy, job training, educational classes, food banks, clothing banks,  or other social or human services to persons needing such services due to physical,  mental, emotional, or other disabilities, but do not provide crisis intervention, day  or night shelter, or case management. Also, public or nonprofit agencies that  provide public services such as food banks, clothing banks, day shelters, and job  training centers. This does not include religious institutions, offices, government  facilities, schools, hospitals, clinics, day care, homeless services uses, medical  institutions, diversion facilities, lodging in any form, or residential uses.  SECTION XI. The interim zoning controls imposed herein shall be in effect for six (6)  months from the passage of this ordinance, unless ended earlier by subsequent City Council  action, or unless subsequently extended by the City Council pursuant to state law.  SECTION XII.  During the interim period in which these interim zoning controls are in  effect, City staff are directed to further investigate:   (1)  The matter of COVID‐19 deintensification shelters and what further zoning and land  use regulation, if any, of such uses the City should undertake; and  AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  42  (2) The matter of homeless services uses and what further zoning and land use regulation,  if any, of such uses the City should undertake.      City staff should present to the City Council for its consideration an update regarding  these two matters prior to the expiration of the interim zoning controls established in this  ordinance, as well as any further recommended legislation.    SECTION XIII. If any Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION XIV. The City Council declares an emergency for the protection of the public  welfare and to enable the purpose and intent of this ordinance to be accomplished. This  ordinance shall take effect immediately when passed by the City Council. The City Clerk shall  cause to be published a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary  shall consist of this ordinance’s title..      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  43  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2120:12/3/2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 44 ATTACHMENT A USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC G. OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Diversion facility and diversion interim service facility                     H71 H71               Homeless services use          H H H  H   H   COVID‐19 deintensification shelter          P101 P101 P101  P101 P101  P101   K. SERVICES Hotel, extended‐stay          P29 P29 P29     P29 P   AGENDA ITEM #7. d) AB - 2770 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Consultant Contract for Cedar River Bank Stabilization Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Community Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Cailin Hunsaker, Parks and Trails Director EXT.: 6606 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Engineers' estimate for design, permitting and construction support to relocate the Cedar River Trail and stabilize the river embankment next to it is $375,638.00. Because this project is included with FEMA incident 4539-DR-WA, it is eligible for reimbursement. Cost to the City of Renton will be approximately $45,077, or 12% of the original cost estimate. This amount will be bud geted with the General Fund portion of the Parks and Trails Division of the Community Services Department. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In February 2020, the Cedar River experienced a 50-year flood event that eroded a section of river bank next to the Cedar River Trail, between the Cedar River Dog Park and Riverview Park. The Trail is narrowed in this area to keep the public at a safe distance from the edge of the river bank. Geotechnical evaluations recommend that the Trail be relocated away from the current escarpment until the river bank can be stabilized from future erosion. This Professional Services Consultant Agreement is estimated to cost $375,638.00 for the design, permitting and advisory support during construction for the temporary relocation of the Cedar River Trail and stabilization of the Cedar River embankment. On March 2, 2020, City Council ratified and approved an emergency proclamation by Mayor Pavone that proclaimed the existence of a local emergency due to the flood. With this, and by meeting other FEMA thresholds, the Cedar River Trail and Bank Stabilization project is eligible for Federal reimbursement as FEMA project 4539-DR-WA. This engineering phase will cost the City approximately $45,077, or 12% of the original cost estimate, and will be budgeted with the General Fund portion of the Parks and Trails Division of the Community Services Department. GeoEngineers, Inc. was selected pursuant to City of Renton Policy and Procedure 250-02 – Purchasing, Bidding and Contracting Requirement, Section 6.10.3 - Emergencies. EXHIBITS: A. Agreement B. Copy of Resolution 4400 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement for Design, Permitting and Construction Support for Cedar River Trail Relocation and Cedar River Bank Stabilization Project with GeoEngineers, Inc. AGENDA ITEM #7. e)     AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN, PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION  SUPPORT FOR CEDAR RIVER TRAIL RELOCATION AND CEDAR  RIVER BANK STABILIZATION PROJECT      THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as November 19, 2020, is by and between  the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and GeoEngineers, Inc,  (“Consultant”), a Washington State corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to  collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully exe cuted by the Parties, this Agreement  is effective as of the last date signed by both parties.    1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide design, permitting and construction support  services to relocate the Cedar River Trail away from the Cedar River and complete Cedar  River bank stabilization as specified in Exhibit “A,” which is attached and incorporated  herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.”    2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order  changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modif ications. Any such changes  to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be  equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit “A” or as otherwise  mutually agreed by the Parties.    3. Time  of  Performance: Consultant  shall  commence  performance  of  the  Agreement  pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit “A.” All Work shall be performed by no  later than May 31, 2021.    4. Compensation:    A.  Amount.  Total  compensation  to  Consultant  for  Work  provided  pursuant  to  this  Agreement shall not exceed $375,638.00, plus any applicable state and local sales  taxes. Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to  the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit “A.” The Consultant agrees that any hourly  or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s)  unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit “A.” Except as specifically  provided herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes  imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.    AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 2 OF 10   B.  Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter  in which Work is performed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form  specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the  name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for  such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all  Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30)  calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the  voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements  of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply  with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that  does not meet the  requirements of this Agreement.    C.  Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by  the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the  Consultant  to  perform  the  Work  or  for  any  breach  of  this  Agreement  by  the  Consultant.     D.  Non‐Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for  payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be  obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the  current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all  remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to  the City in the event this provision applies.    5. Termination:  A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without  cause by giving ten (10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event  of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,  worksheets,  models  and  reports,  or  other  material  prepared  by  the  Consultant  pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part  of the Work.    B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled  to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termin ation, less all payments  previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance  of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the  Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the  City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance  of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be  deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by  the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of  termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City.  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 3 OF 10     6. Warranties And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that  Consultant  will  perform  all  Work  identified  in  this  Agreement  in  a  professional  and  workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards  and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the  Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and  Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall  certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to  RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product  created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work  of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would  restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non‐ exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and  display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s  adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of  this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section  shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.    7. Record  Maintenance:  The  Consultant  shall  maintain  accounts  and  records,  which  properly  reflect  all  direct  and  indirect  costs  expended  and  Work  provided  in  the  performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by  applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six  years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access  to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit  expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act  (Chapter  42.56  RCW).  The  provisions  of  this  section  shall  survive the expiration or  termination of this Agreement.    8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply  with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search  of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work,  including, but not limited to, e‐mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages,  recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event  Consultant  believes  said  records  need  to  be  protected  from  disclosure,  it  may,  at  Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend,  and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim  or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive  records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein,  or  not  provided  them  to  the  City  in  a  timely  manner.  Consultant  shall  produce  for  distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely  manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section  shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 4 OF 10     9. Independent Contractor Relationship:  A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth  in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City  during  the  period  of  the  Work  shall  be  that  of  an  independent  contractor,  not  employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the  details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the  Consultant  shall  have  no  obligation  to  work  any  particular  hours  or  particular  schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of  attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work.  Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work  covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other  workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper,  provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it  alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent  for the City.    B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal  income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial  Insurance  Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant  or any employee of the Consultant.    C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement  is with an individual, the  Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant  retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any  losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so.    10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless  the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any  and  all  claims,  demands,  actions,  suits,  causes  of  action,  arbitrations,  mediations,  proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees,  penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or  by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent  acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a  breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by  the City’s sole negligence.    Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this ag reement is subject to RCW  4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to  construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real  estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons  or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 5 OF 10   Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s  liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence.    It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in  this  Agreement  constitute  Consultant’s  waiver  of  immunity  under  the  Industrial  Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties  have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall  survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.    11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City  employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any  person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance  with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant sh all not give a gift of any kind  to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a  business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was,  is,  or  will  be  involved  in  selecting  the  Consultant,  negotiating  or  administering  this  Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work.    12. City of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business  License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing  throughout the term of this agreement with the City.    Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at:   http://www.rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9824882    Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at:  http://dor.wa.gov/doing‐business/register‐my‐business     13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain:  A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for  each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement.    B. In  the  event  that  Work  delivered  pursuant  to  this  Agreement  either  directly  or  indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and  Omissions  coverage  shall  be  provided  with  minimum  limits  of  $1,000,000  per  occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any  Work  provided  by  a  licensed  professional  or  Work  that  requires a  professional  standard of care.    C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the  State of Washington, shall also be secured.    AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 6 OF 10   D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non‐owned, leased, hired  or non‐owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single  limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on  behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes.    E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general  liability policy on a non‐contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall  not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of  any  insurance  required  by  this  Agreement  be  construed  to  limit the  liability  of  Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s  recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.    F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the  proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work.    G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within  two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice.    14. Delays:  Consultant  is  not  responsible  for  delays  caused  by  factors  beyond  the  Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable  control occur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsibl e for damages, nor shall the  Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement.    15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or  encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement  without  the  written consent of the other.    16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the  appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time  to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt  requested, by facsimile or by nat ionally recognized overnight courier service. Time period  for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT  facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following  transmission.  Email  and  telephone may be used for purposes of administering  the  Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement.    CITY OF RENTON  Cailín Hunsaker, Parks and Trails Director  1055 South Grady Way  6th Floor  Renton, WA 98057  Phone: (425) 430‐6606  CONSULTANT  Joe Callaghan, Principal Biologist  1101 South Fawcett Avenue  Suite 200  Tacoma, WA  98402  Phone: (253) 383‐4940  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 7 OF 10   E‐mail:  chunsaker@rentonwa.gov  Mobile: (425) 757‐3007  E‐mail:  jcallaghan@geoengineers.com  Mobile: (360) 265‐0162    17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational  qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows:  A. Consultant,  and  Consultant’s  agents,  employees,  representatives,  and  volunteers  with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall  not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital  status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement  provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any  sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational  qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application  for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits  under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies.    B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and  that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed,  color,  national  origin,  sex,  age,  sexual  orientation,  physical, sensory or mental  handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the  following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment  advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and  selection for training.    C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non‐discrimination  provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in  whole or in part.    D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state  and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the  project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation,  and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton  Council Resolution Number 4085.    E. Consistent with Section 18, below, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to comply  with all discrimination provisions contained in this paragraph 17 and paragraphs 8, 9  and 10 of Exhibit “B.”    18. Federal Contracting Provisions:  Consultant agrees to the Federal contracting provisions  as specified in the document entitled, “State and Federal Laws to be Observed,” which is  attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein.    19. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge:  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 8 OF 10   A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant.    B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent  specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.    C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work  except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.    D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to  provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if  Consultant employs, sub‐contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform  the Work, said employee/sub‐contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such  training, licensing, or certification.  E. This is a non‐exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to  other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of  Work called for in this Agreement.    F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to  health insurance.    G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as  that for any persons employed by the Consultant.    20. Other Provisions:  A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City  and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to  execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant.    B. General  Administration  and  Management.  The  City’s  project  manager  is  Cailín  Hunsaker, Parks and Trails Director. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate  with the City’s contract manager or his/her designee.    C. Amendment  and  Modification.  This  Agreement  may  be  amended  only by  an  instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties.    D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this  Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to  this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for  which  they  are  referenced  within  this  Agreement.  To  the  extent a  Consultant  prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains  terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 9 OF 10   body  of  this  Agreement  shall  prevail  and  the  extraneous  terms  shall  not  be  incorporated herein.    E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and  interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of  Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in  accordance  with  all  applicable  federal,  state,  county  and  city laws,  codes  and  ordinances.    F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared  by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the  other  as  a  result  of  the  preparation,  substitution,  submission or other event of  negotiation, drafting or execution.    G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or  interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King  County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice  Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor.  Consultant  hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of  such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of  Washington.    H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or  part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the  remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.    I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the  Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not  incorporated are excluded.    J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of  its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set  forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of  this Agreement.    K. Third‐Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to,  nor shall be  construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the  Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will  be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else.    L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns,  and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners,  AGENDA ITEM #7. e) PAGE 10 OF 10   successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all  covenants of the Agreement.    M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s  failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not  prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other  provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this  Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach  unless it is expressly waived in writing.    N. Counterparts.  The  Parties  may  execute  this  Agreement  in  any  number  of  counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together  constitute this one Agreement.    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date  last signed by the Parties below.    CITY OF RENTON      By:_____________________________  GEOENGINEERS, INC.      By:____________________________  Armondo Pavone  Mayor  Joe Callaghan, PWS  Principal    _____________________________  Date    _____________________________  Date  Attest      _____________________________  Jason A. Seth  City Clerk    Approved as to Legal Form      By: __________________________  Shane Moloney  City Attorney    AGENDA ITEM #7. e) 1101 South Fawcett Avenue, Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98402 253.383.4940 November 6, 2020 City of Renton Community Services – Parks and Trails 1055 South Grady Way – 5th Floor Renton, Washington 98057 Attention: Cailin Hunsaker Subject: Proposal –Cedar River Bank Stabilization Project: Phase 1 - Design, Permitting and Construction Support for Relocation of Trail Renton, Washington File No. 0693-087-01 INTRODUCTION Thank you for requesting this proposal from GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) to support the City of Renton (City) with engineering design and permitting services for the Cedar River Trail Bank Stabilization Project. The project objective is to stabilize an area of erosion on the left bank of the Cedar River at approximately River Mile 2.5. The riverbank at this location is on the outside edge of a bend in the river channel that eroded over a length of approximately 150 feet during the February 8, 2020 storm event. The bank erosion is of concern because the Cedar River Trail runs directly adjacent to the river and is at risk of being impacted if the bank erosion continues further inland. The City is pursuing funding from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to complete the bank stabilization work. The trail is currently partially open to the public. The bank stabilization project has two phases. The first phase is to relocate the trail approximately 20 feet landward (away from the river) to allow the trail to be re-opened for public use. The second phase of the project is to complete the bank stabilization. This proposal provides a Scope of Services and budget for design, permitting and construction support services for both phases of work. Design work includes preliminary design to support permitting and final design to produce bid-ready contract documents. Permitting work includes preparation of project environmental documentation and permit applications, as well as assisting the City with agency coordination and negotiation of final permit conditions. Construction services including bidding support, plus construction observation and engineering/permitting support to assist the City’s construction management and administration. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 2 File No. 0693-087-01 SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE 1 - TRAIL RE-LOCATION Task 1. Pre-Design of Trail Re-Location Activities ■ Review site conditions information available for various on-line data sources, including geographic information system (GIS) and other data sources, related to property parcel boundaries and ownership, critical areas, utilities, fish barriers and other relevant information. Develop a project base map based on available Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data. ■ Visit the site to observe site conditions and survey identified site features.  Locate and survey ordinary high water (OHW) line along about 200 feet of riverbank and visually locate the stakes and include the location on the project basemap. Complete a reconnaissance in the general site vicinity for wetlands and critical area features (such as large trees) to be avoided at the site and in the access and staging areas.  Complete a reconnaissance to confirm that no wetlands are present and to assess the presence/absence of other critical areas and buffers and add approximate extents to base map.  Identify and survey trees greater than 6 inches diameter at breast height (DBH) that may need to be removed within the project impact area. Review City of Renton Tree Inventory map for presence of significant trees.  Collect up to 10 spot elevations within the bank failure area to compare to LiDAR data. ■ Review GeoEngineers’ report Field Reconnaissance and Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Cedar River Bank Stabilization, River Mile 2.5, Renton, Washington, prepared for City of Renton, May 29, 2020. ■ Coordinate with the One-Call utility locate service to locate and mark utilities in the project area. GeoEngineers will complete a field sketch of utility locate marks. ■ Coordinate with the City to develop design criteria and/or applicable existing City standard plans and specifications. Document design criteria including vehicle load ratings and other items. ■ Attend a City-initiated Pre-Application Meeting with City staff and other agencies as appropriate. GeoEngineers will prepare a briefing packet with a one-page project summary and one figure. The City will prepare a meeting summary identifying permits and approvals needed, including project plan reviews. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ Changes in site conditions over time that affect the work may require additional budget. ■ The site does not contain contaminated soils or wetlands. The site does not have utilities threatened by the eroding bank, or that need to be relocated. ■ The riverbank is not a flood control levee or revetment or critical channel migration boundary. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) PL84-99 coordination is not required. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 3 File No. 0693-087-01 ■ The trail re-location will not include work below the OHW line, and therefore a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) submittal will not be required. OHW line will be marked in field and added to drawings as an “approximate” feature. ■ Trail use is limited to non-motorized recreational use by the public. If a fence is needed along the eroded bank top of slope, the City will install and maintain it. Vehicle signage or guardrail is not required. ■ The City will obtain cultural resources documentation if needed. ■ The project impact area where potential for tree removal exists is in the immediate vicinity of the eroded bank and trail relocation. ■ Site topographic survey will be obtained from LiDAR. If additional site-specific topographic survey is determined to be needed from spot elevations collected, the City will contract for the survey or authorize budget for GeoEngineers’ to perform surveying services or retain an outside surveyor. Deliverables ■ Briefing packet for pre-application meeting Task 2. Environmental Documentation and Permitting Support Activities ■ Develop a brief permitting plan that lists permits/approvals needed, with estimated schedule and strategy for obtaining each permit/approval needed. List key stakeholders and coordinate approach. ■ Prepare environmental documentation and permit applications, including:  A National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) project description for use by FEMA in complying with NEPA through a Categorical Exclusion.  No Effect Biological Evaluation (BE) for compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA).  A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) through the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).  Shoreline Management Act Exemption.  Assist the City with agency coordination and permit negotiations. Task Assumptions ■ The City will lead agency/stakeholder coordination work to obtain permits/approvals. City will be lead applicant for local permits, if required. ■ FEMA will be the NEPA lead using the information identified in the scope, above, which will be provided to FEMA by GeoEngineers. NEPA approval during Phase 1 will also address Phase 2 activities. ■ The City will coordinate with FEMA to obtain cultural resources documentation for compliance with NEPA; a cultural resource is not included in our scope. ■ Project will be State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) exempt. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 4 File No. 0693-087-01 ■ Construction stormwater permit from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) will not be required as the disturbed area will be less than 1 acre. ■ Clearing and Grading permit is not required. Deliverables ■ Permitting plan and stakeholder list ■ NEPA Project Description Package, submitted to FEMA ■ Draft and Final BE, submitted to FEMA ■ HPA Application Package, submitted to WDFW ■ Shoreline Exemption Memo documenting that the project qualifies as an emergency action, provided for City use Task 3. Geotechnical Support Activities ■ Prepare a final version of our Field Reconnaissance and Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report (dated May 29, 2020) to support design of the Phase 1 trial relocation. Our geotechnical report will include recommended trail setback distances and equipment setbacks within the work area. ■ Support the permitting process by providing an assessment of potential Geologically Hazardous Areas in the project vicinity and provide our opinion on how the proposed Phase 1 work may impact these areas, if present. ■ Support preparation of geotechnical related drawings and specifications for Phase 1 of the project. ■ Provide additional geotechnical consultation as needed to support the project and attend project meetings. ■ Complete up to five geotechnical related site visits during construction of the trail re-alignment. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ Geotechnical staff will attend two meetings with the client. ■ Site visits during construction assume up to 4 hours onsite plus travel time. ■ Project will be SEPA exempt. Deliverables ■ Final geotechnical report for the trail relocation. ■ Field report summarizing observations and recommendations for each site visit during construction. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 5 File No. 0693-087-01 Task 4. Design of Trail Relocation Activities ■ Complete stormwater design analysis including stormwater modeling to size a non-fish passable stormwater drainage culvert approximately 200 feet long to convey stormwater under the trail through the project site. ■ Prepare draft and revised draft preliminary design drawings to support project environmental documentation and permit applications, including cover sheet, site preparation/demolition sheet, site staging and access sheet, temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) plan, trail relocation plan, trail relocation profile and sections sheet, details sheet and final restoration/hydroseeding sheet. The drawings will reference an attachment containing City standard plans for trail section, pavement and base thicknesses, culvert and trench section, and other applicable work. Prepare list of bid items and specifications. The design will avoid and minimize impacts to trees where possible and trees to retain will be located on the design drawings. ■ Prepare a draft, draft final and final “bid packet”. Draft version is for City project staff review. Draft final version is for City permit review. Final version is “for bid”. The bid packet will include drawings, bid schedules, specifications and cost estimate integrated into the City’s standard bid package. GeoEngineers’ additions to the bid packet will consist of:  Updating project name, dates and other project specific items.  Develop list of bid items and update bid form.  Update the City’s standard Division 1 specifications, including substantial edits to the Summary of Work section and minor edits to other specification sections.  Review and update City technical specifications for earthwork, hot mix asphalt, culvert, erosion control blanket, hydroseed and other relevant work items.  Drawings stamped by Professional Engineer (PE). Final drawings will be signed.  Construction schedule and Engineer’s estimate of the cost to construct the work. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ Changes in site conditions over time that affect the work may require additional budget. ■ The riverbank is not a flood control levee or revetment or critical channel migration boundary. USACE PL84-99 coordination is not required. ■ The trail re-location will not include work below the OHW line, and therefore a JARPA submittal/HPA permit will not be required. OHW locations will be marked in field and surveyed in Task 1. An OHW line will be added to drawings. ■ Design of structures including retaining walls or utilities is not required. ■ Trail use is limited to non-motorized recreational use by the public. A fence is not needed along the eroded bank top of slope. Vehicle signage or guardrail is not required. ■ Site topographic survey will be obtained from LiDAR. If additional site-specific topographic survey is determined to be needed from spot elevations collected in Task 1, the City will contract for the AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 6 File No. 0693-087-01 survey or authorize budget for GeoEngineers’ to perform surveying services or retain an outside surveyor. ■ A river hydraulic model is not needed for this project phase. ■ Specifications will be in Construction Specification Institute (CSI) format. The City will provide a recent example bid package for GeoEngineers revision. The City will prepare the “front end” portions of the bid documents and specifications, including instructions to bidders, bid form, other forms, contract, general conditions and Division 1 administrative specifications. GeoEngineers will revise the project description, bid form, Summary of Work specifications, recommend minor edits to Division 1 administrative specifications and develop Division 2 technical specifications. Deliverables ■ Draft and revised draft preliminary design drawings with list of bid items and specifications. ■ Draft, revised draft and final bid package. Task 5. Bidding and Construction Support Activities ■ Support the City during bidding process by attending pre-bid meeting and assisting City of responding to bidder questions and preparing addenda. ■ Complete up to 20 hours for field observation of the contractor’s work and document the site visits through five field reports and one punch list itemizing items to be corrected/completed. ■ Complete up to 20 hours of office engineering/permitting support including review of Contractor work plans and submittals and responding to Contractor request for information (RFIs). ■ The design engineer will attend up to three virtual construction progress meetings and three site construction progress meetings and will prepare meeting minutes for those meetings. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ The City will lead and complete bidding and change order negotiation and preparation, and overall construction management (including correspondence with the contractor, review of pay requests and close-out). GeoEngineers can provide additional bidding, construction, and/or maintenance/warranty support (such as due to unusual events, a challenging contractor or extensive/detailed issues) under a supplemental scope of services. Deliverables ■ Draft and final meeting minutes for up to six meetings. ■ Construction support documentation including field reports, and suggested responses for submittal reviews and RFIs for City to confirm/revise and send to Contractor. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 7 File No. 0693-087-01 PHASE 2 - BANK STABILIZATION Task 6. Preliminary Design Activities ■ Perform an updated survey next spring to identify changes in the bank erosion or changes in OHW and other site features. Visit the site to observe site conditions and survey identified site features including identifying site changes from previous survey.  Survey OHW line along about 200 feet of riverbank and update the location on the project basemap,  collect up to 10 spot elevations within the bank failure area to compare to LiDAR data, and  survey trees greater than 6 inches DBH that may need to be removed within the project impact area. ■ Perform desktop geomorphic assessment. ■ Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Scour Analysis:  Complete a flow magnitude and frequency analysis to estimate discharge values for the 2-, 10- , 25-, 50- and 100-year recurrence discharges for the drainage area contributing to the project reach.  Obtain the hydraulic model used for the most recent FEMA flood study, and update the model as needed to support project analyses. Update hydrology based on recent flow records. Run the WDFW Climate Change model and estimate future hydrology for one condition. Complete a hydraulic model and analysis of the existing and proposed conditions to evaluate hydraulic parameters at the bank failure location. The hydraulic models will be one-dimensional using USACE’s Hydrologic Engineering Center – River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) software.  Use the results of the hydraulic modeling to develop proposed bank geometry, material sizing, wood stability and scour countermeasures. Complete a scour analysis to calculate depth of scour at the toe of the bank. We will use the calculated scour depth to inform scour countermeasure design and material sizing for bank stabilization. ■ Complete preliminary design analyses based on desktop geomorphic assessment and hydraulic model. Estimate rock size needed to be stable at the 100-year flood. Calculated anchorage requirements for large wood. ■ Prepare preliminary 30-percent-level design, consisting of:  Preliminary drawings o Cover Sheet o General Notes sheet o Access and Staging Plan o Existing conditions, Demolition and Site Preparation plan o TESC plan o Proposed conditions plan o Typical cross sections o Typical details o Trail Relocation Plan AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 8 File No. 0693-087-01 o Trail Relocation sections and details o Restoration plan  Draft list of technical specifications  Draft bid form  Preliminary Design-level estimate of construction cost. ■ 60-Percent Design Development  Prepare 60 percent design drawings, draft specifications, bid form and estimate of construction cost. Estimated of construction cost. ■ Pre-Design Meetings All meetings will be virtual. We anticipate four brief design project meetings, two 2-hour meetings to receive City comments on the 30 percent and 60 percent design submittals, and two 2-hour meetings to receive FEMA comments on the 30 percent and 60 percent design submittals. We will prepare meeting minutes briefly summarizing key discussions and documenting key decisions and action items. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ The project impact area where potential for tree removal exists is in the immediate vicinity of the eroded bank and trail relocation. ■ The 30 and 60 percent submittals will be prepared as drafts for City review, and revised drafts for FEMA review. No design report will be prepared for Preliminary Design. ■ Existing topographic information provided by the City can be used for topography and river bathymetry provided the bank erosion remains similar to current conditions as depicted in the LiDAR. If the bank topography or river bathymetry changes substantially, as identified during the site visit in this task, then site-specific survey information will be needed to provide a current base map for design analyses and drawings. Deliverables ■ 30-Percent Design submittal (portable document format [pdf]) ■ 60-Percent Design submittal (pdf) ■ Meeting minutes Task 7. Geotechnical Engineering Activities ■ Visit the project site to mark a location for the proposed exploration and contact the “One-Call” Utility Notification Center, as required by Washington State law. ■ Advance one boring to a depth of about 60 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the bank stabilization area. The boring will be completed by a licensed driller under subcontract to GeoEngineers. A representative from our firm will continuously monitor the exploration, keep a detailed log of the conditions encountered and collect representative soil samples for laboratory testing. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 9 File No. 0693-087-01 ■ Perform laboratory testing on select samples from the boring. We anticipate our laboratory program will consist of grain-size distribution tests, percent fines determinations and moisture content determinations. ■ Provide preliminary geotechnical engineering recommendations for stabilization of the riverbank. We anticipate that these recommendations will be reviewed by the City for selecting a preferred stabilization method. ■ Once the preferred stabilization method is selected, we will complete supplemental geotechnical analyses and provided recommendations to support final design. ■ Prepare a geotechnical engineering report for the project summarizing the results of our subsurface explorations and analyses and our geotechnical recommendations for design. ■ Support development of the 30, 60, 90 and 100 percent design plans and specifications. ■ Provide ongoing geotechnical consultation as needed and attend project meetings. ■ Complete up to 10 geotechnical related site visits during construction. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ Permits, if required to complete our boring, will be provided by others. ■ Geotechnical staff will attend up to six meetings with the client ■ Site visits during construction assume up to 6 hours onsite plus travel time Deliverables ■ Geotechnical Engineering Services Report ■ Field report summarizing observations and recommendations for each site visit during construction. Task 8. Environmental Documentation and Permitting Support Activities ■ Delineate and mark wetlands and/or other critical area features (such as trees greater than 6 inches) as needed for permitting. ■ Locate/update the OHW line generated in Phase 1 along about 200 feet of riverbank and mark with stakes for survey in Task 6. ■ Prepare environmental documentation and permit applications, including:  Wetland and Aquatic Areas Delineation Report  A JARPA  A BE for compliance with the ESA  A HPA permit application  Section 401 Water Quality Certification Pre-Application Meeting Request Form AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 10 File No. 0693-087-01  Coastal Zone Management Consistency Form, if required  Shoreline Management Act Exemption  Assist the City with agency coordination and permit negotiations. ■ Submit permit applications to:  USACE for Section 404 Clean Water Act permit  Ecology for Section 401 Clean Water Act Certification  Ecology for Coastal Management Zone Consistency approval if not covered by USACE permit.  WDFW for HPA permit Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ NEPA compliance during Phase 1 will cover Phase 2 activities as well. No further NEPA coordination is anticipated. ■ Project will be SEPA exempt. ■ Construction stormwater permit from Ecology will not be required as the disturbed area will be less than 1 acre. ■ Clearing and Grading permit is not required. ■ Application fees, if any, will be provided by the City. Deliverables ■ Wetland and Aquatic Areas Delineation Report, submitted with multiple permit applications ■ JARPA package, submitted to USACE and Ecology ■ HPA application, submitted online to WDFW ■ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Pre-Application Meeting Request Form, submitted to Ecology ■ Coastal Zone Management Consistency Form, if required, submitted to Ecology Task 9. Final Design Activities ■ Prepare 90 percent design submittal including draft design report, drawings, specifications, bid form and estimate of construction cost, for City review. ■ Prepare revised 90 percent design submittal including draft design report, drawings, specifications, bid form and estimate of construction cost, for FEMA review. ■ Prepare draft 100 percent design submittal, including draft design report, drawings, specifications, bid form and estimate of construction cost, for City and FEMA review. ■ Drawings stamped by PE. Final drawings will be signed. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 11 File No. 0693-087-01 ■ Prepare final for bid submittal including stamped and signed bid package including bid form and specifications, stamped and signed drawings, and appendices as needed. We will separately submit the final stamped and signed design report and estimate of construction cost. ■ All design meetings will be virtual. We anticipate four brief design project meetings, a 2-hour meeting to receive City comments on the 90 percent design submittal, and a 2-hour meeting to receive FEMA comments on the 90 percent. We will prepare meeting minutes briefly summarizing key discussions and documenting key decisions and action items. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ The site does not contain contaminated soils or wetlands. The site does not have utilities threatened by the eroding bank, or that need to be relocated. ■ The project advances in a consistent manner building on prior phases. Comments on the draft 100 percent design submittal will be very minor. If substantive design changes occur that require revising earlier design work, additional time and budget may be required. ■ Specifications will be in CSI format. The City will provide a recent example bid package for GeoEngineers revision. The City will prepare the “front end” portions of the bid documents and specifications, including instructions to bidders, bid form, other forms, contract, general conditions, and Division 1 administrative specifications. GeoEngineers will revise the project description, bid form, Summary of Work specifications, recommend minor edits to Division 1 administrative specifications and develop Division 2 technical specifications. Deliverables ■ Draft, revised draft 90-Percent Design (pdf) submittal ■ Draft 100-percent design submittal (pdf) ■ Final for bid submittal. Meeting minutes. Task 10. Bidding and Construction Support Activities ■ Support the City during bidding process by attending pre-bid meeting and assisting City of responding to bidder questions and preparing addenda. ■ Complete up to 60 hours for field observation of the contractor’s work and document the site visits through five field reports and one punch list itemizing items to be corrected/completed. ■ Complete up to 60 hours of office engineering/permitting support including review of Contractor work plans and submittals and responding to Contractor RFIs. ■ The design engineer will attend up to six virtual construction progress meetings and six site construction progress meetings and will prepare meeting minutes for those meetings. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 12 File No. 0693-087-01 Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ The City will lead and complete bidding and change order negotiation and preparation, and overall construction management (including correspondence with the contractor, review of pay requests and close-out). GeoEngineers can provide additional bidding, construction, and/or maintenance/warranty support (such as due to unusual events, a challenging contractor or extensive/detailed issues) under a supplemental scope of services. Deliverables ■ Draft and final meeting minutes for up to 12 meetings. ■ Construction support documentation including field reports, and suggested responses for submittal reviews and RFIs for City to confirm/revise and send to Contractor. Task 11. Project Management Activities ■ Prepare brief Project Management Plan with project goals and objectives, key staff, key activities and milestones for design and permitting, ■ Prepare detailed monthly status reports and pay requests (invoices). ■ Prepare overall project simple bar chart schedule. Update schedule three times during project. ■ Attend up to six virtual meetings/calls with City regarding project status. Prepare up to six sets of meeting minutes. Task Assumptions Our scope and budget for this task are based on the following assumptions and exclusions: ■ The project duration is from November 2020 to April 2021. Deliverables ■ Project management plan monthly status reports, schedule and updates, and meeting minutes. FEE ESTIMATE, SCHEDULE AND CONTRACT TERMS Fee Estimate The fee for our services will be determined using the rates contained in our standard Schedule of Charges, which is attached as part of this proposal. The total estimated fee for the work described above and a per- task breakdown are included in Exhibit A, Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet. Schedule The general schedule specific to each task is identified in the task descriptions above. An overall schedule for this contract will be produced in Task 11. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) City of Renton | November 6, 2020 Page 13 File No. 0693-087-01 Contract Terms The services described in this proposal will be completed and payment made according to the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement established between the City of Renton and GeoEngineers, Inc. CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to provide design and permitting services on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this proposal. Sincerely, GeoEngineers, Inc. Theo Malone, PE Joseph O. Callaghan, PWS Project Engineer Principal Biologist TM:JOC:tlm: Attachments: Schedule of Charges—Redmond/Seattle/Tacoma 2020 Exhibit A. Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet One copy submitted Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright© 2020 by GeoEngineers, Inc. All rights reserved. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Schedule_Redmond-Seattle-Tacoma - 2020 Schedule of Charges – 2020 COMPENSATION Our compensation will be determined on the basis of time and expenses in accordance with the following schedule unless a lump sum amount is so indicated in the proposal or services agreement. Current rates are: Professional Staff Staff 1 Scientist $ 117/hour Staff 1 Engineer $ 124/hour Staff 2 Scientist $ 134/hour Staff 2 Engineer $ 142/hour Staff 3 Scientist $ 155/hour Staff 3 Engineer $ 161/hour Scientist 1 $ 179/hour Engineer 1 $ 185/hour Scientist 2 $ 185/hour Engineer 2 $ 190/hour Senior Engineer/Scientist 1 $ 207/hour Senior Engineer/Scientist 2 $ 227/hour Associate $ 240/hour Principal $ 260/hour Senior Principal $ 285/hour Technical Support Staff Administrator 1 $ 83/hour Administrator 2 $ 95/hour Administrator 3 $ 108/hour CAD Technician $ 106/hour CAD Designer $ 122/hour CAD Design Coordinator $ 132/hour GIS Analyst $ 145/hour Senior GIS Analyst $ 160/hour GIS Coordinator $ 180/hour *Technician $ 90/hour *Senior Technician $ 108/hour *Lead Technician $ 117/hour *Hours in excess of 8 hours in a day or 40 hours in a week will be charged at one and one-half times the hourly rates listed above. Contracted professional and technical services will be charged at the applicable hourly rates listed above. Staff time spent in depositions, trial preparation and court or hearing testimony will be billed at one and one-half times the above rates. Time spent in either local or inter-city travel, when travel is in the interest of this contract, will be charged in accordance with the foreg oing schedule. A surcharge may be applied to night and weekend work. See proposal for details. Rates for data storage and web-based access will be provided on a project-specific basis. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Redmond-Seattle-Tacoma Schedule of Charges | 2020 Page 2 of 2 Equipment Air Sparging Field Test, per day $ 100.00 Air/Vapor Monitoring Equipment (PID, 5-Gas Meter), per day $ 100.00 Asbestos Sample Kit $ 25.00 Blastmate, per day $ 100.00 D&M Sampler, per day $ 80.00 DO (Dissolved Oxygen) Kit $ 20.00 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, per day $ 40.00 E-Tape (Electric Tape), per day $ 25.00 Field Data Acquisition Equipment $ 50.00 Field Gear / Reconnaissance, per day $ 50.00 Gas Detection Meters, per day $ 100.00 Generator, per day $ 100.00 Groundwater Pressure Transducer w/ Datalogger, per day $ 50.00 Groundwater Pressure Transducer w/ Datalogger, per week $ 200.00 Hand Auger, per day $ 20.00 Inclinometer Probe, per day, 1/2 day minimum $ 200.00 Interface Probe, per day $ 50.00 Iron Test Kit $ 20.00 Laser Level, per day $ 50.00 Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Equipment, per day $ 225.00 Multiparameter Water Quality Meter, per day $ 80.00 Nuclear Density Gage, per hour, 1/2 day minimum $ 10.00 Peristaltic Pump, per day $ 50.00 pH Probe, per day $ 15.00 PID, FID or OVA, per day $ 100.00 Saximeter, per day $ 50.00 Scuba Diving Gear, per day/per diver $ 250.00 Shallow Soil Exploration Equipment, per day $ 50.00 Soil Field Screening Equipment, per day $ 15.00 Soil Sample Kit $ 15.00 Steam Flow Meter, per day $ 15.00 Strain Gauge Readout Equipment, per day $ 50.00 Surface Water Flow Meter, per day, 1/2 day minimum $ 50.00 Surface Water Quality Monitoring Equipment, per day $ 50.00 Turbidity Meter, per day $ 30.00 Vehicle usage, per mile, or $30/half-day, whichever is greater $ 0.65 Specialized and miscellaneous field equipment, at current rates, list available upon request. OTHER SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND SPECIAL TAXES Charges for services, equipment, supplies and facilities not furnished in accordance with the above schedule, and any unusual items of expense not customarily incurred in our normal operations, are charged at cost plus 15 percent. This includes shipping charges, subsistence, transportation, printing and reproduction, miscellaneous supplies and rentals, surveying services, drilling equipment, construction equipment, watercraft, aircraft, and special insurance which may be required. Taxes required by local jurisdictions for projects in specific geographic areas will be charged to projects at direct cost. Per diem may be charged in lieu of subsistence and lodging. Routinely used field supplies stocked in-house by GeoEngineers, at current rates, list available upon request. In-house testing for geotechnical soil characteristics at current rates, list available upon request. Associated Project Costs (APC) Computer hardware and software, telephone and fax communications, printing and photocopying and routine postage via USPS will be charged at a flat rate of 6 percent of labor charges. These charges are labeled as Associated Project Costs (APC). All rates are subject to change upon notification. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Employee TypeJoe C Principal Associate Ken F Sr. 2David C Sr. 1Brett LSr. Engr 1Theo M Engr 2 Staff 3 Staff 2 Staff 1 CADD GIS Admin 3 Admin 2 Admin 1 $260.00 $240.00 $227.00 $207.00 $207.00 $190.00 $161.00 $142.00 $124.00 $122.00 $145.00 $108.00 $95.00 $83.00 TASK LABOR ITEMIZED SUB TOTALHOURS COST EXP COST COST1.0Pre-Design of Trail Relocation$24,654 1.1 Site Visit and Survey124101012443 $6,838 $700 $7,538 1.2 Data Gathering and Pre-Meeting Preparation1 2 12 16 16 4 12 8 71 $11,498 $0 $11,498 1.3 Pre-Application Meeting428844 30 $5,618 $0 $5,618 2.0Environmental Documentation and Permitting Support$16,898 2.1 Permitting Plan2824 2 18 $3,326 $0 $3,326 2.2 Environmental Documentation 424216 2 48 $8,898 $0 $8,898 2.3 Permitting Support41224 2 24 $4,674 $0 $4,674 3.0Geotechnical Support$10,492 3.1 Geotechnical Report26412 $2,366 $0 $2,366 3.2 Drawing and Specifications189 $1,896 $0 $1,896 3.3 Meetings and Site Visits261220 $3,654 $200 $3,854 3.4 Permitting and Design Support3811 $2,376 $0 $2,376 4.0Design of Trail Relocation$35,264 4.1 Preliminary Design Submittal and Revision2 12 2 8 20 24 4 8 80 $12,286 $0 $12,286 4.2 Final Design Submittal 2 12 2 8 20 48 4 12 108 $15,594 $0 $15,594 4.3 For Bid Submittal 2 8 2 8 24 6 50 $7,384 $0 $7,384 5.0Bidding and Construction Support$15,553 5.1 Bidding 1161644 436$6,675 $0 $6,675 5.2 Construction Support (Field and Office)4282 8 2448 $8,678 $200 $8,878 6.0Preliminary Design$64,668 6.1 Site Visit and Survey41212432 $5,380 $700 $6,080 6.2 Hydraulic Model and Analyses12 30 60 4 8 114 $18,284 $0 $18,284 6.3 30% Design Submittal and Revision1 12 4 20 40 60 8 145 $21,372 $0 $21,372 6.4 60% Design Submittal and Revision1 12 4 20 40 40 8 125 $18,932 $0 $18,932 7.0Geotechnical Engineering$53,753 7.1 Subsurface Exploration18202 31 $5,332 $8,000 $13,332 7.2 Geotechnical Analysis and Reprot840204 72 $13,852 $600 $14,452 7.3 Drawing and Specification Support, Attend Project Meetings12 25 104 51 $10,097 $0 $10,097 7.4 Geotechnical Site Visits During Construction110804 95 $15,622 $250 $15,872 8.0Environmental Documentation and Permitting Support$50,934 8.1 Field Delineation10 1020 $3,490 $200 $3,690 8.2 Environmental Documentation and Permit Applications16 8 52 8 100 28 8 8 228 $37,900 $0 $37,900 8.3 Permit Submittal and Coordination88881648 $9,344 $0 $9,344 9.0Final Design$45,782 9.1 90% Design Submittal and Revision2 12 2 20 24 48 16 124 $18,242 $0 $18,242 9.2 Final Design Submittal and Revision2 12 4 20 24 48 16 126 $18,656 $0 $18,656 9.3 For Bid Submittal 2 6 2 12 12 12 12 58 $8,884 $0 $8,884 10.0Bidding and Construction Support$31,242 10.1 Bidding 8 1 12 6 4 4 35 $6,023 $0 $6,023 10.2 Construction Support - Field8 8 24 40 4 12 96 $15,340 $200 $15,540 10.3 Construction Support - Office12 1 12 20 4 12 61 $9,679 $0 $9,679 11.0Project Management$26,398 11.1Brief Project Management Plan11224 37 $5,024 $0 $5,024 11.2Monthly Invoices and Status Reports25420 76 $13,598 $0 $13,598 11.3Schedule and Meeting Minutes424 84 40 $7,776 $0 $7,776 Total Labor Hours62 32 180 263 111 276 146 510 12 360 56 22 192 0 2222Total Labor Cost$16,120 $7,680 $40,860 $54,441 $22,977 $52,440 $23,506 $72,420 $1,488 $43,920 $8,120 $2,376 $18,240 $0 $364,588 $11,050 $375,638 Total Cost$16,120 $7,680 $40,860 $54,441 $22,977 $52,440 $23,506 $72,420 $1,488 $43,920 $8,120 $2,376 $18,240 $0 $364,588 $11,050 $0 $375,638 PHASE 1 - TRAIL RELOCATIONPHASE 2 - BANK STABILIZATIONTASK NUMBERPERSONNEL & LABOR RATEExhibit A. Consultant Fee Determination Summary SheetCity of RentonCedar River Bank Stabilization Project RatePhase 1 - Design, Permitting, and Construction Support for Phase 1 - Relocation of TrailActivity Code (see below)DESCRIPTIONRev. 11/6/2020AGENDA ITEM #7. e) STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS TO BE OBSERVED The applicant must comply with all state and federal laws in performing all tasks undertaken with respect to the Public Assistance Program. The following sections are included for informational purposes and are not professed to include all relevant laws. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with all federal, state, and local laws. 1.EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY – All contracts shall contain a provision requiring compliance with E.O. 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by E.O. 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and as supplemented by regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.” 2.COPELAND “ANTI-KICKBACK” ACT (18 U.S.C. 874 AND 40 U.S.C. 276c) – All contracts and subgrants in excess of $2,000 for construction or repair awarded by recipients and subrecipients shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 U.S.C. 874), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he is otherwise entitled. The recipient shall report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. 3.CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C 327-333) – Where applicable, all contracts awarded by recipients in excess of $2,000 for construction contracts and in excess of $2,500 for other contracts that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers shall include a provision for compliance with Sections 102 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-333), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5). Under Section 102 of the Act, each contractor shall be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than 1 ½ times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. Section 107 of the Act is applicable to construction work and provides that no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 4.RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT – Contracts or agreements for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work shall provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the recipient in any resulting invention in accordance with 37 CFR part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. EXHIBIT BAGENDA ITEM #7. e) 5. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) AND THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT(33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), as amended – Contractors and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000 shall contain a provision that requires the recipient to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) Violations shall be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 6. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT (31 U.S.C. 1352) – Contractors who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier shall also disclose any lobbying in non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient. 7. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (E.O.s 12549 and 12689) – No contract shall be made to parties listed on the General Services Administration’s List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs in accordance with E.O.s 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension.” This list contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, and contractors declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than E.O. 12549. Contractors with awards that exceed the small purchase threshold shall provide the required certification regarding its exclusion status and that of its principal em ployees. 8. PUBLIC LAW 88-352, TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964(42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) (24 CFR Part 1). The APPLICANT must comply with the provisions of "Public Law 88-352," which refers to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.). The law provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or national origin, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. 9. SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT, 1973, AS AMENDED (29 U.S.C. 794). The APPLICANT must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which provides that no otherwise qualified individual shall, solely by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from participation (including employment), denied program benefits or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal assistance funds. 10. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.) The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq. That Act provides a comprehensive national mandate to eliminate discrimination against individuals with disabilities. The Act may impose requirements on the APPLICANT in four principle ways: 1) with respect to employment; 2) with respect to the provision of public services; 3) with respect to transportation; 4) with respect to existing facilities and new construction. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) 11. THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C Section 4321 et seq., and 24 CFR Part 58). The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The purpose of this Act is to attain the widest use of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences. Environmental review procedures, including determining and publishing a Finding of Significance or of No Significance for a proposal, are a necessary part of this process. Pursuant to these provisions, the APPLICANT must also submit environmental certifications to the DEPARTMENT when requesting that funds be released for the project. The APPLICANT must certify that the proposed project will not significantly impact the environment and that the APPLICANT has complied with environmental regulations and fulfilled its obligations to give public notice of the funding request, environmental findings and compliance performance. 12. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11990, MAY 24, 1977: PROTECTION OF WETLANDS (42 F.R. 26961 et seq.) The APPLICANT shall comply with Executive Order 11990. The intent of this Executive Order is (1) to avoid, to the extent possible, adverse impacts associated with the destruction or modification of wetland, and (2) to avoid direct or indirect support of new construction in wetlands wherever there is a practical alternative. The APPLICANT, to the extent permitted by law, must avoid undertaking or providing assistance for new construction located in wetlands unless (1) there is no practical alternative to such construction, and (2) the proposed action includes all practical measures to minimize harm to wetlands which may result from such use. In making this determination, the APPLICANT may take into account economic, environmental and other pertinent factors. 13. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11988, MAY 24, 1977: FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT (42 F.R. 26951 et seq). The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11988. The intent of this Executive Order is to (1) avoid, to the extent possible, adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains, and (2) avoid direct or indirect support of floodplain development wherever there is a practical alternative. If the APPLICANT proposes to conduct, support or allow an action to be located in a floodplain, the APPLICANT must consider alternatives to avoid adverse effects and incompatible involvement in the floodplain. If siting in a floodplain is the only practical alternative, the APPLICANT must, prior to taking any action (1) design or modify its actions in order to minimize any potential harm to the floodplain, and (2) prepare and circulate a notice containing an explanation of why the action is proposed to be located in a floodplain. 14. THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT OF 1968, AS AMENDED (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.). The APPLICANT shall comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The purpose of this Act is to preserve selected rivers or sections of rivers in their free-flowing condition, to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation goals. Federal assistance by loan, grant, license, or other mechanism cannot be provided to water resources construction projects that would have a direct and adverse effect on any river included or designated for study or inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System. 15. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.). The APPLICANT shall comply with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The intent of this Act is to preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, restore or enhance the resources of the nation's coastal zone. Federal agencies cannot approve assistance for proposed projects that are inconsistent with the state's Coastal Zone Management program except upon a finding by the U.S. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) Secretary of Commerce that such a project is consistent with the purpose of this chapter or necessary in the interests of national security. 16. THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The APPLICANT shall comply with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The intent of this Act is to ensure that all federally assisted projects seek to preserve endangered or threatened species. Federally authorized and funded projects must not jeopardize the continued existence of endangered and threatened species or result in the destruction of or modification of habitat of such species which is determined by the U.S. Department of the Interior, after consultation with the state, to be critical. 17. THE RESERVOIR SALVAGE ACT OF 1960, AS AMENDED BY THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT OF 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469 et seq.). Under the Reservoir Salvage Act, the APPLICANT must comply with provisions for the preservation of historical and archaeological data (including relics and specimens) that might otherwise be irreparably lost or destroyed as a result of any alteration of the terrain caused as a result of any federal construction project or federally licensed activity or program. Whenever the APPLICANT finds, or is notified in writing by an appropriate historical or archaeological authority, that its activities in connection with any federal funded construction project or federally licensed project, activity or program may cause irreparable loss or destruction of significant scientific, prehistoric, historical or archaeological data, the APPLICANT must stop work immediately and must notify the U.S. Secretary of Interior and the Department in writing and provide appropriate information concerning the project or program activity. 18. THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL DATA PRESERVATION ACT OF 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469 a-1 et seq.). The APPLICANT shall comply with the Archaeological and Historical Data Preservation Act, which provides for the preservation of historic and archaeological information that would be lost due to development and construction activities as a result of federally funded activities. 19. THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED (42 U.S.C. Section 201, 300(f) et seq., and U.S.C. Section 349). The APPLICANT must comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended, which is intended to protect underground sources of water. No commitment for federal financial assistance, according to this Act, shall be entered into for any project, which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determines, may contaminate an aquifer that is the sole or principal drinking water source for an area. 20. THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING THE CLEAR WATER ACT OF 1977, PUBLIC LAW 92-212 (33 U.S.C. SECTION 1251 et seq.). The APPLICANT must assure compliance with the Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, which provides for the restoration of chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nation's water. 21. THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT, AS AMENDED BY THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT OF 1976 (42 U.S.C. SECTION 6901 et seq.) The APPLICANT must assure compliance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended. The purpose of this Act is to promote the protection of health and the environment and to conserve valuable material and energy resources. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) 22. THE FISH AND WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT OF 1958, AS AMENDED (16 U.S.C. SECTION 661 et seq.) The APPLICANT must assure compliance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended. The Act assures that wildlife conservation receives equal consideration and is coordinated with other features of water resources development programs. 23. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICY, CHAPTER 8.26 RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.26 RCW and Chapter 365- 24 WAC when its activities involve any acquisition of real property assisted under this Grant Agreement or the displacement of any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization or farm that results from such acquisition. 24. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA), CHAPTER 43.21 (C) RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 43.21(C) RCW and Chapter 197-11 WAC, the guidelines by which local agencies will (1) require environmental checklists from private and public entities considering an action potentially subject to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) requirement of SEPA, (2) make "threshold determinations" that such an action will not have a significant environmental impact, (3) provide for the preparation of a draft and final EIS if the action has significant impact, and (4) circulate the EIS to other agencies and interested parties. 25. NOISE CONTROL, CHAPTER 70.107 RCW. The APPLICANT shall assure compliance with the state Noise Control Act. Objectives of the Act are to assist local governments in implementing local noise ordinances and to control and reduce excessive noise in Washington. 26. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971, CHAPTER 90.58 RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 90.58 RCW. This Act defines a planning program and a permit system, which are initiated at the local government level under state guidance. Its purpose is to protect and enhance the state's shoreline and it includes a comprehensive shoreline inventory process and a master program for regulation of shoreline uses. A permit application at the local level must be in compliance with those plans and consistent with the state Coastal Zone Management program if substantial developments and shoreline modifications occur, and a record of the application and decision must be submitted to the state. 27. STATE BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 19.27 RCW; ENERGY RELATED BUILDING STANDARDS, CHAPTER 19.27A RCW; AND PROVISIONS IN BUILDINGS FOR AGED AND HANDICAPPED PERSONS, CHAPTER 70.92 RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.27 RCW, Chapter 19.27A RCW, Chapter 70.92 RCW and the regulations for building construction and for barrier free facilities adopted by the Washington State Building Code Council pursuant to these statutes. The State Building Code Act provides for a uniform state building code and mandates counties, cities and towns to administer and enforce its provisions. Local governments are authorized to modify the state building code to fit local conditions as long as such modifications do not result in a code that is less than the minimum performance standards and objectives contained in the state code. 28. OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT, CHAPTER 42.30 RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with provisions of Chapter 42.30 RCW which require that all meetings of the governing body which pertain AGENDA ITEM #7. e) to this Grant Agreement shall be open to the public except those where specific provision is made for executive sessions pursuant to RCW 42.30.110. 29. LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, CHAPTER 49.60 RCW. The APPLICANT shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 49.60 RCW in all activities relating to this Grant Agreement. 30. GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 89-10, DECEMBER 11, 1989: PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, AND GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE ORDER 90-04, APRIL 21, 1990: PROTECTION OF WETLANDS. The APPLICANT shall ensure that it avoids any activities that would adversely affect wetlands and adequately mitigates unavoidable impacts. For the purposes of this requirement, except where a contrary definition is provided by statute, mitigation means: (1) avoiding the impact altogether by not taking certain action or part of an action; (2) minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; (3) rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; (4) reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; (5) compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and (6) monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures. Mitigation may not include any of the above measures to the extent that they may be contrary to statute as applied under the particular circumstances. Emergency work that is essential to save lives and protect property and public health is exempt from these provisions. 31. PREVAILING WAGES ON PUBLIC WORKS, CHAPTER 39.12 RCW. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 39.12, Prevailing Wages on Public Works. This statute mandates that the prevailing rate of wage, as determined by the State Department of Labor and Industries, be paid to workers performing under public works contracts. 32. CONTRACTING WITH SMALL MINORITY FIRMS, WOMEN’S BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA FIRMS. In accordance 44 CFR 13.36(e), Contracting with Small and Minority Firms, if employing contractors or suppliers the Contractor will take affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. (1) The grantee and subgrantee will take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women’s enterprises and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. (2) Affirmative steps shall include: (i) Placing qualified small and minority businesses, and women’s business enterprises on solicitation lists; (ii) Assuring that small and minority enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (iii) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority business, and women’s business enterprises; (iv) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority business, and women’s business enterprises; (v) Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and (vi) Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (e)(2)(i) through (v) of this section. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 4400 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, PROCLAIMING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City of Renton, State of Washington, empowers the Mayor to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency in the City, when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a major emergency or natural disaster; and WHEREAS, Governor Jay Inslee proclaimed a state of emergency for many counties in Washington State, including King County, due a severe winter storm event which began impacting Washington State January 20, 2020, producing high winds, heavy snowfall, ice accumulation, and extreme rainfall resulting in major flooding,saturated soils, landslides, stream bank and slope erosion, fallen tree limbs, broken and uprooted trees, and flying debris; and WHEREAS, County Executive Dow Constantine proclaimed a state of emergency due to this same incident and resultant conditions in King County; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has experienced significant impacts from this series of storms; staff from multiple departments were required to transition to emergency operations; and the potential still exists for significant impacts to life and property in the City; and WHEREAS, Mayor Armondo Pavone and the City Council are requested by the Community Services Administrator to proclaim the existence of a local emergency therein; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2020, the Mayor proclaimed an emergency, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. 4400 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are adopted as findings. SECTION II. An emergency did exist at the time of the proclamation of emergency by Mayor Armondo Pavone. By these written recitals and findings, the City Council does hereby ratify and approve the Mayor's emergency proclamation, attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of March, 2020. Jas A. Seth ity Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of March. 2020 4&cL — Ao Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney SEAL = * = Date of Publication: 3/6/2020 (summary) c° " 6 ' SA IEDsec' RES:1837:2/26/2020 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. 4400 EXHIBIT A PROCLAMATION OF EMERGENCY 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. 4400 City of Renton Proclamation of Emergency WHEREAS, the City of Renton,State of Washington, empowers the Mayor to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency in the City,when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a major emergency or natural disaster; and WHEREAS, Governor Jay Inslee proclaimed a state of emergency for many counties in Washington State, including King County, due a severe winter storm event which began impacting Washington State January 20, 2020, producing high winds, heavy snowfall, ice accumulation, and extreme rainfall resulting in major flooding, saturated soils, landslides, stream bank and slope erosion,fallen tree limbs, broken and uprooted trees, and flying debris; and WHEREAS, County Executive Dow Constantine proclaimed a state of emergency due to this same incident and resultant conditions in King County; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has experienced significant impacts from this series of storms; staff from multiple departments were required to transition to emergency operations; and the potential exists for significant impacts to life and property in the city; and WHEREAS, Mayor Armondo Pavone and the City Council are requested by Community Services Administrator Kelly Beymer and Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman, to proclaim the existence of a local emergency therein; and WHEREAS, the Mayor finds that conditions of peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City, caused by heavy rainfall resulting in flooding, saturated soils, landslides, stream bank and slope erosion,fallen tree limbs, and damaged trees, and that the perils are anticipated to continue for an unknown number of days. NOW THEREFORE, I,Armondo Pavone, Mayor of the City of Renton, proclaim that an emergency exists in the City of Renton and proclaim as follows: 1. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respect. 2. The proclamations of emergency by the Governor and the County Executive are confirmed and adopted by the City. 3. It is hereby proclaimed that during the existence of said local emergency,the powers, functions, and duties necessary to stabilize and control said incident are hereby given to Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator, and Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator, and their successors, to address within their respective areas of responsibilities. Emergency Proclamation Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. 4400 4. Each City of Renton Department is authorized to exercise powers vested under this declaration/proclamation in light of the exigencies of an extreme emergency situation, including but not limited to seeking aid,staffing needs, accommodations and operations. 5. City Public Works and Community Services are authorized pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.04.280 and Renton Policy and Procedure 250-02, paragraph 6.10,and authorize Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator, and Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator to waive competitive bidding requirements and award all necessary contracts on behalf of the City of Renton to address the emergency situation and those that may arise as a result of it. In emergency situations, RCW 39.04.280 requires that a written finding of the existence of an emergency be made and entered into the public record no later than two weeks following the award of the contract. 6. Provide appropriate emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster. 7. This local emergency shall be deemed to continue for a period of 90 days unless extended by the Mayor and City Council. Dated F ruary 26, 2020 uu urrrrrpg Ar Pavone, Mayor y of ReN 'to,,, City of Renton Tr Attest E. SEAL * y s Jason S th, City Clerk Emergency Proclamation Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) AB - 2773 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Consultant Contract Agreement for Regional, State, Federal Affairs RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Executive Department STAFF CONTACT: Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator EXT.: 6569 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Funding for Regional, State and Regional Affairs Advocacy is included in the 2021 -2022 Executive budget at $166,000 annually. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The 2021-2022 Budget included funds for advocacy towards the city’s regional, state and federal priorities. The Administration is recommending the renewal of our current contract with Outcomes by Levy (LLC). Doug Levy (the principal with Outcomes by Levy) works to advance the city’s regional, state and federal interests. This agreement would involve advancing Renton’s adopted 2021 Regional Policy Agenda and assisting in the implementation of the actions identified in that Plan. This work would include 2021-22 key projects and deliverables such as capital budget, transportation and transportation revenue package, racial justice and equity, public safety and HB 1590 – 1/10th of 1 cent sales tax for affordable housing and related services. In addition, ongo ing priorities and areas of focus would include Sound Transit 3 and future Sound Transit packages, Family First Community Center, Sunset Area Revitalization and King County METRO Service. This contract will also allow the consultant to support Renton’s elected and appointed officials in intergovernmental and multijurisdictional meetings and committees representing Renton, help create more effective relationships with other jurisdictions and collaborate on issues of mutual interest. The consultant will provide regular briefings to Council, Mayor and staff. The consultant will also annually update our regional, state and federal policy agenda. A detailed scope of work is attached. EXHIBITS: A. Contract/Scope of Work B. 2021 State Legislative Agenda C. 2021 Regional/Federal Legislative Agenda STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services contract agreement in the amount of $166,000 annually between the City of Renton and Outcomes by Levy LLC from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) AGREEMENT FOR LEGISLATIVE SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as December 1, 2020, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Outcomes by Levy LLC (“Consultant”), an independent consultant. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. 1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide legislative and governmental affairs services as may be requested by the City’s Mayor or designee and as specified in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.” Terms of this contract shall supersede any past contractual obligations with the city; Consultant’s contracts with other entities will be limited to contracts with Washington Recreation & Park Association (WRPA), Recreational Boating Association of Washington (RBAW), Washington State Arts Federation, Humanities Washington, the City of Fife, and the City of Lake Stevens, unless approved in writing by the City. Such approval shall not be reasonably withheld. 2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit A or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. 3.Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence on January 1, 2021. All Work shall be performed by no later than December 31, 2022. 4. Compensation: A. Amount. Total annual compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $166,000 per year, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. Compensation shall be paid at a flat rate of $13,000 per month plus $10,000 total annual cost for expenses, which includes mileage, conferences and miscellaneous expenses. The Consultant agrees that any monthly rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit A. Except as specifically provided herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 2 OF 13 B. Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter in which Work is performed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the requirements of this Agreement. C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. Termination: A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause by giving ten (10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part of the Work. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 3 OF 13 shall be made by the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City. 6. Warranties And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance, which would restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work, including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 4 OF 13 produce for distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor Relationship: A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work. Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper, provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent for the City. B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant or any employee of the Consultant. C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so. 10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City’s sole negligence. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 5 OF 13 relative to construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in this Agreement constitute Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work. 12. City of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at: http://www.rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9824882 Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at: http://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business 13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain: A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement. B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional standard of care. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 6 OF 13 C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, shall also be secured. D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes. E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work. G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. 14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control occur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement. 15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement. CITY OF RENTON CONSULTANT AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 7 OF 13 Preeti Shridhar 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-6569 pshridhar@rentonwa.gov Doug Levy 15619 62nd Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Phone: (425) 922-3999 Doug@outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com 17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: A. Consultant, and Consultant’s agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies. B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non-discrimination provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in whole or in part. D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation, and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton Council Resolution Number 4085. 18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge: A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 8 OF 13 B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such training, licensing, or certification. E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of Work called for in this Agreement. F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to health insurance. G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as that for any persons employed by the Consultant. 19. Other Provisions: A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant. B. General Administration and Management. The City’s project manager is Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City’s contract manager or his/her designee. C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties. D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be incorporated herein. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 9 OF 13 E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution. G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of Washington. H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated are excluded. J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else. L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 10 OF 13 M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is expressly waived in writing. N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Doug Levy Outcomes by Levy _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ Shane Moloney City Attorney Contract Template Updated 9/9/2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 11 OF 13 EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK 2021-22 Key Projects and Deliverables Capital Budget o Work on pursuing 2021-23 Capital funding for 168th Bike/Ped lanes in Cascade/Benson Hill neighborhood o Work on pursuing 2021-23 Capital funding for North Coulon boardwalk project o Help ensure HealthPoint/City preserve $3+ million in Building Communities Fund monies for Family First Community Center Transportation and Transportation Revenue Package o Work on pursuing new-revenue package funding for N. 8th Direct Access Ramp o Work on pursuing new-revenue package for SR 167/Grady Way Overcrossing o Work on pursuing new-revenue package funding for Eastrail extension to Coulon o Help lead on Transit-Oriented-Development legislation to add flexibility with redevelopment of BRT site at Rainer and Grady o Work on pursing direct distribution, enhanced grant funding, and local options for Renton and other local governments in any new revenue package Racial Justice & Equity o At regional, state, and federal levels, work on pursuit of funding that can better enable Renton to assist with bolstering opportunities for communities of color and under- served communities Fiscal Matters o Work on ways to help provide revenue relief for Renton from impacts of COVID-19 on its Operating Budget – at regional, state, and federal level o Help ensure that “state-shared revenues” are protected and seek to maximize revenue flexibility for Renton and other local governments Public Safety o Work to support policing reform measures at the state level while also ensuring these can be realistically achieved and leave discretion to local law enforcement HB 1590 – 1/10th of 1 cent sales tax for affordable housing and related services o Help organize and further work of Inter-Departmental Staff Team and to develop a short-, medium- and long-term implementation plan for most effective use of “1590” dollars in the Renton community AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 12 OF 13 Ongoing Priorities and Areas of Focus Sound Transit 3 and future Sound Transit packages o Continue work to ensure 2024 delivery of BRT o Help ensure Light Rail Transit is studied and integrated into design of BRT Station at Rainier/Grady o Work to ensure park-and-ride at 405/44th can be located in a manner that provides efficient access to the BRT Station, protects future mixed-use development of the PanAbode site, and does not foreclose the possibility of future structured parking o Work with Mayor and Board Member Ed Prince to ensure City stays on top of important and time-sensitive Sound Transit issues Family First Community Center o Continue to assist Community Services team with securing new Capital funding and also to seek out opportunities for future Operations funding Sunset Area Revitalization o Continue to work with CED and Renton Housing Authority on a coordinated strategy for continued investment by local, state and federal agencies in attractive affordable housing in this area King County METRO Service o Continue work on service improvements, enhancements, and better coordination of service including Rapid Ride “I” Line and RKAAMP State Legislative o Provide weekly reports and convene weekly check-in meetings with Mayor and Department Heads o Report and follow up post-Session o Conduct necessary follow-up work and meetings with area State Legislative Delegation. o Advocate for Renton’s position on various bills, budget items impacting the city Federal-level advocacy o Develop outreach program with offices of U.S. Senator Patty Murray, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell, U.S. Rep. Adam Smith, U.S. Rep. Kim Schrier, etc. o Help identify short-list of federal issues of Renton-specific importance o Help lobby Congress and Federal Agencies on Renton Airport’s behalf o Advocate Renton position on other key issues, as identified by the City o Develop Federal Agenda priorities on annual basis Regional Issues o Lead city’s ongoing communication with King County Executive’s Office and County Councilmembers Dave Upthegrove and Reagan Dunn AGENDA ITEM #7. f) PAGE 13 OF 13 o Ensure ongoing staff support for Mayor and City Councilmembers that serve on regional committees including Regional Policy Committee (Mayor) and Regional Transit Committee (Councilmember Ryan McIrvin) Augment staff work and representation on regional committees Develop Regional Agenda priorities on annual basis Work to ensure that Renton maximizes its share of regional funding through Countywide Parks Levy, 4Culture, VSHSL, Best Starts for Kids, etc. Help track Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) committees and funding Help lead city’s coordination with Sound Cities Association (SCA) Advocate for funding Help ensure Renton is represented at all regional tables – PSRC, King County advisory committees, SCA, ETP, SCATBd, etc. Special Projects o Participate in regular check-in meetings with Mayor to ensure he is apprised, up to date, and providing direction on key regional/state/federal issues & special projects o Take active role in helping to lead projects that are of importance to Renton, impact multiple departments, and have regional standing and importance, including: County, regional, state, and federal grants strategy for Renton Metro transit service; Sound Transit; Family First Community Center; Eastrail; Affordable Housing opportunities including those in Sunset Area and with respect to “1590” funding Potential water taxi service on Lake Washington; Boeing-related issues Regional, statewide and federal transportation issues Policing reform and mental health funding opportunities “Stimulus” funding opportunities Permanent relocation of feeding program, cold-weather shelter 4Culture Funding o 2021 Redistricting – Work with Mayor, City Council, and Deputy Public Affairs Administrator to formulate a strategy for what Renton will seek as part of 2021 redistricting affecting state legislative and federal congressional district boundaries AGENDA ITEM #7. f) City of Renton 2021 State Legislative Agenda Key Priorities Quality of Life – 2021-23 Capital Budget Requests Bike Lane Connections for Lower-Income Residents in the Cascade/Benson Hill Neighborhood: Renton will seek $1 million to connect a 1.2-mile section of SE 168th Street from 108th Avenue SE to 128th Avenue SE. The project, which ultimately will feature both sidewalk and dedicated bike-lane components, also involves establishing three safety crossings of this important artery, which serves Renton Park and Cascade Elementary Schools, Lindbergh High School, the future Family First Community Center, and the proposed extension of the Soos Creek Trail. Having safe walking and biking connections was identified as a top priority by residents of this recently-annexed area, which is comprised of 54 percent communities of color, has extremely limited bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and has a lower per-capita income level than Renton as a whole. Time-Sensitive, Safety-Driven, Environmentally-Beneficial Repairs to the North Coulon Park Walkway: The City is seeking $1.3 million for critical repairs to a 360-linear-foot segment of the concrete paving on the North Coulon walkway. This project is a safety imperative, since the pilings underneath the concrete decking must be replaced or wrapped and floats underneath picnic pads are badly water-logged. This work is critical to do before a serious incident occurs – such as the recent Pier 58 collapse in Seattle. This project involves removing concrete decking and replacing it with light-penetrating material that is beneficial for fisheries and salmon habitat. Additionally, this work must be done under a lease agreement with the State Department of Natural Resources, and thus DNR and the Departments of Ecology and Fish & Wildlife are strongly supportive of seeing this work proceed. Building Communities Fund Allocation (HealthPoint) for Family First Community Center: In preparation for the 2021-23 Capital Budget, and in ranking 20 different proposals for funding from the “Building Communities Fund” (BCF) program, a Department of Commerce advisory committee has recommended a $3.029 million allocation for HealthPoint, which will be the key organization managing the health clinic and other programming within the new Family First Community Center. The HealthPoint application ranked seventh out of all those submitted, and Renton will actively work to ensure a sufficient BCF program funding level to ensure this $3.029 million grant can proceed. Racial Justice and Equity Seeking Outside Funding and Tools: Renton has heard calls for the City to invest significant funding into programs to bolster opportunities for communities of color and under-served communities. While COVID-19 induced impacts have left a projected $16.9 million hole in the City’s 2021-22 Operating Budget, Renton will actively seek out regional, state, and federal funding opportunities; collaborate with the Renton Regional Community Foundation; and evaluate ways to leverage new funding under the House Bill 1590 statute (1/10th of 1 cent sales tax for affordable housing and related services), as tools to build up funds that can enable increased human services funding, provide start-up dollars for programs that give new opportunities to people of color, and address early crises in affordable housing that will come when the Governor’s eviction moratorium is lifted at the end of 2020. Transportation Infrastructure 2021 Transportation Revenue Package: Renton will actively support the development of a 2021 Transportation Revenue Package that is underway among leadership of both the Senate and House AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Transportation Committees. The City will work in coalition with Chamber and business groups, other local governments, contractors, etc. In particular, the City will promote funding and inclusion of the following projects, direct distribution items, grant enhancements, and local options: Projects – 405/N. 8th Direct-Access Ramp: Renton will urge that this project, which was included in the “Forward Washington” packages developed in the Senate in 2019 and 2020, and received early funding in a 2019 tolling authorization bill for I-405, be a part of any project list (Estimated Cost: $230 Million). I-405/SR 167 Area Transit Improvements: With a Bus Rapid Transition (BRT) station coming to the intersection of SR 167/Rainier Avenue North and Grady Way by 2024, the already clogged ramps off of 405/167 will become significantly more dangerous and impassable, particularly for transit vehicles attempting to access the BRT Station. Renton has worked with WSDOT on a modest-cost fix – a Grady Way Overcrossing – that can save up to two minutes in AM and PM peak transit travel times. (Estimated Cost: $40-$50 million). Eastrail – Extension of Current Renton Terminus from Milepost 5 to Coulon/Southport: As part of any bicycle/pedestrian capital projects portion of a package, Renton will seek funding to help extend the current Eastrail southern terminus point from Milepost 5 off Lake Washington Boulevard to the entrance to Coulon Park and the Southport development. (Estimated Cost: $6 million). Legislation: Statutes governing how WSDOT sells off property to be part of a Transit-Oriented-Development (TOD) project: Renton will team with City of Kirkland and others on legislation, to be supported by WSDOT, providing the agency with more flexibility in how it sells off areas of state property within future TOD projects. For example, the bill could give WSDOT more ability to veer from strict “fair market value” and parking-stall-for-parking-stall replacement requirements if affordable housing is part of a TOD project. Direct Distribution, Enhanced Funding for Grant Programs, Local Options Key Components of any Transportation Package for Local Governments: Renton will work closely with the Association of Washington Cities, individual cities, counties, and others to ensure any revenue package crafted in 2021 includes a direct distribution of new gas tax to cities and counties; enhanced funding for mission-critical grant programs such as the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB); and new local options that cities and counties can evaluate to address local roadway needs – particularly maintenance-driven ones. Renton is also open to working with legislators on changes to state law that will improve efficiency, accountability, and cost-containment of the transportation system. Fiscal Matters – Revenue Relief and Flexibility, Protecting Existing Revenues Revenue Relief: Like so many other cities across the state, Renton has suffered a severe hit to its budget stability and revenues during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a $16.9 million revenue shortfall anticipated for 2021. The City asks that state lawmakers look at structural ways to provide revenue relief to local governments, including a change to the 1 percent property tax limitation that does not allow annual revenues to even keep pace with cost inflation. While Renton remains open to working with lawmakers on revenue-relief measures that could assist the state and local governments, the City has some concerns over the idea of a statewide payroll tax that would penalize businesses which reward talented and highly- trained workers with high compensation levels. Protect Existing Revenues, including “State-Shared” Revenues: Renton urges lawmakers, in addressing a projected four-year, $4.5 billion Operating Budget shortfall, to ‘do no harm’ and refrain from state-shared revenue reductions or other cuts to local governments that would only result in a transferring of negative impacts from the state level to the local level. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Fiscal Flexibility, including changes to ‘lien’ laws: Renton will strongly support a ‘fiscal flexibility’ bill being led by AWC and the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC), enabling local governments to have more flexibility in the use of existing revenue streams during the COVID crisis. The bill also includes amendments to utility ‘lien’ laws so that municipal utilities can recover some of the costs incurred in exempting residents from shutoffs and late payments for months on end. Public Safety, Including Policing Reforms Re-imagining policing and local law enforcement reforms: Renton has worked hard, dating back to 2008, to maintain a frequent and open dialogue with its communities of color (55 percent of the Renton population), to maintain hiring practices and training that welcome and promote diversity, and to be transparent in its day-to-day operation. Still, the City and its Police Chief maintain there is much more work to do. Renton is thus prepared to strongly support many of the reforms anticipated to come forth in 2021 around de-certification, independent use-of-force investigations, duty to intervene, enhanced funding for training and mental health, and establishment of a statewide data-base for reporting use-of- force incidents. Law enforcement agencies from Renton and other South King County jurisdictions also are working with lawmakers on new ways to pilot the use of mental health professionals in tandem with police. The City will be active in working on policy and budget items to ensure they are achievable and can be implemented in a way that does not pose undue burdens or costs on local law enforcement agencies. Basic Law Enforcement Academy (BLEA) Training Slots: Renton will strongly support legislative efforts to enhance funding for – or at least maintain a recent infusion of funding for – BLEA training of newly-hired law enforcement officers. “Support/Oppose” and “Track/Monitor” Support/Oppose and Track/Monitor Issues Budget and Fiscal Matters B&O Tax Authority: Local authority for cities that impose a B&O tax should be preserved. The City will oppose efforts to undercut local authority. Marijuana Revenue Distributions: The Legislature should adhere to previous agreements to take city and county marijuana excise tax distributions from $30 million to $40 million a biennium. Renton will support any 2021 effort to either enhance marijuana revenue distribution or provide cities/counties with local options. Criminal Justice/Public Safety/Fire/Courts Drug and Property Seizure and Forfeiture Laws: Renton will join the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC), AWC, and others in opposing efforts to weaken these laws. Interpreter Funding: Renton is experiencing significant cost increases in hiring non-English- speaking interpreters as required by law. What was previously costing $50 to $65 and hour is now costing $100 an hour. The City will support any legislative efforts to add needed funds for interpreter programs. Legislation that would disallow local law enforcement from evaluating citations written by a law enforcement officer as a factor of his/her job performance: Renton joins other law enforcement agencies in ensuring that the number of citations an officer writes not be used as a quota-driven way to evaluate performance. However, the City joins local law enforcement AGENDA ITEM #7. f) groups in opposing legislation that would disallow an evaluation of written citations being used as one of many factors in evaluating performance. Traffic safety cameras: Renton will join other cities, counties, and law enforcement groups in opposing unnecessary limitations around the use of traffic safety cameras that have been proven to reduce accidents and save lives. Use of “Facial Recognition” Technology by Local Law Enforcement: Renton understands and appreciates the necessity of rules and regulations for use of ‘facial recognition’ in our society. The City will track this issue closely during the 2021 Session. Economic Development/Infrastructure/Housing (Affordable Housing) Tax-Increment Financing: Renton will strongly support 2021 legislation to establish a robust “TIF” program in Washington State, or something akin to TIF that can be passed into state law. The City will seek to join coalitions of Chambers, business groups, AWC and local governments, and others in promoting the TIF tool. Affordable Housing/Homelessness: Renton will strongly support measures to funding and tools for local communities to add affordable housing units and options for those in need. This includes rental assistance and other security measures that provide tenants with protection against evictions that do not leave them with reasonable housing options. Capital Budget Investment: Renton strongly supports maximizing the state’s bonding capacity in development of a two-year Capital Budget. The City particularly supports grant programs such as the Washington Wildlife & Recreation Program (WWRP), Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF), the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA), and several other grant programs that distribute grant funds to local agencies on a competitive basis. Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program: Renton supports legislation that extends the existing “MFTE” program in statute and is open to legislative changes that will add “affordability” provisions to the law – provided the bills are not written in an ‘either/or’ manner that inhibits cities from accepting market-rate and ‘blended’ (part market-rate/part affordable) projects. Public Works Assistance Account: Renton supports efforts to rebuild the PWAA and recapture funding streams previously diverted into the Education Legacy Account. Environmental Sustainability Laws on recycling, packaging, safe disposal: Renton is prepared to support legislation to enhance recycling and safe-packaging practices, and to continue to bolster the use of environmentally responsible disposal of goods through the Product Stewardship program. Land Use/Growth Management Act (GMA) Achieving Density: Renton supports the right of state lawmakers to ensure local communities are accepting their share of population growth. The City urges legislators to respect local discretion on how to best accommodate that growth and to refrain from density mandates that do not make sense for all communities. Local authority over how to add Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): Renton is a major proponent of adding ADUs into local communities and has developed an innovative Model Ordinance that will enable developers to move quickly on deployment of ADUs. However, the City opposes AGENDA ITEM #7. f) legislation that would mandate specific development standards and regulations. Such decisions are best left to elected officials at the local level. Update timelines for GMA, Shoreline, Critical Area Plans: Renton strongly supports legislative initiatives to put the update schedules on a 10-year cycle so that they synch up with the 10-year census population updates. Annexation Statutes: Renton will be prepared to support 2021 legislative initiatives that streamline and update antiquated annexation laws in Washington State. Local Government in General Cyber-Security – More Formal Arrangements in State-Local Collaboration: Renton is helping to spearhead a process with the state’s Chief Information Officer and his “WaTech” staff that would allow a local government Work Group to develop with the CIO more formal arrangements and processes to ensure the state and local jurisdictions team up in fighting cyber-security attacks. Renton appreciates the willingness of the CIO and WaTech to develop these protocols. Public Records Act (PRA): Renton hopes state lawmakers will continue to evaluate ways to provide local agencies with new tools in addressing the proliferation of PRA requests, including better cost-recovery mechanisms for the significant staff costs/outlay required under the Act. E-Mail Records Retention: Renton will support changes to e-mail records retention that establishes a records series for e-mail communication with a minimum retention of seven years regardless of the content of the written message contained in the email. The City recognizes that achieving this goal is a multi-year effort. Parks and Recreation/Arts and Culture Local funding options for parks and recreation agencies: Renton will support legislation that provides new funding options for parks and recreation agencies run by cities, counties, Metropolitan Park Districts, and Park Districts. Personnel, Pensions, Other Human Resources Issues Protect earned service credit for employees who see shared work, reduced hours, furloughs: Renton will strongly support a request expected to come from the Department of Retirement Systems, the Office of Financial Management, AWC, and others on statutory measures to prevent public-agency employees from losing – or seeing reductions in – earned service credit they get toward their pensions for accepting furloughs, reduced hours, and “Shared Work” arrangements during the most trying months of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is precedence for this, as the 2009 and 2011 Legislatures enacted SB 6157 and HB 2070, respectively, to provide 2009-11 biennium and 2011-13 biennium earned service credit protections for public-agency employees in the wake of the Great Recession. Unemployment Insurance Rates and Costs: Renton understands that legislators must ensure the financial sustainability of the “UI” program, but urges lawmakers to minimize rate increases that impose significant new costs on employers, particularly on the heels of the passage of recent Paid Family & Medical Leave and long-term care enhancements. Pension rates: Renton asks lawmakers to proceed with caution in rolling back employer and employee pension rates that could lead to short-term savings now only to be followed by significant cost spikes later. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Transportation Puget Sound Ferry Service Study: The 2021 Legislature will be receiving a study directed by lawmakers and carried out by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), which evaluated the viability of new Puget Sound ferry-service routes. While the Legislature is not expected to take immediate action, Renton supports the work within the study that identified eight (8) potentially viable routes, including two emanating from Southport. The City will further support any efforts to further evaluate and potentially fund such routes. “Sound Communities” proposals to provide more tools for Transit-Oriented-Development projects: Renton is one of three demonstration project locations in the Puget Sound region where an organization known as Sound Communities wants to make specific recommendations as to how TOD and affordable housing can be woven together in a way that is attractively designed and effective for cities. Sound Communities is expected to seek legislation to provide additional funding tools for TOD projects that incorporate affordable housing. Renton is poised to support these legislative proposals. Stormwater, WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 Packages, “K4C” Proposals Stormwater Financial Assistance Program (SFAP): Renton strongly supports enhancing funding levels for the SFAP, which provides grants to cities and counties for stormwater management projects. Ability to charge WSDOT for local stormwater impacts that arise from state projects: Renton has concerns over statutory changes adopted a couple Sessions ago that severely limit the ability of local agencies to recover costs from stormwater impacts that arise from state projects in local communities. The City would support legislation to address this issue if it is put forth. Capital Budget Request Packages Put Forth by Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 8 and 9: Renton supports these legislative requests. Legislative Proposals to advance the work of the King County-Cities Climate Collaboration (“K4C”): Renton is prepared to support legislative proposals that will advance the work of K4C. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) City of Renton 2021 Regional Affairs Agenda Transportation/Transit King County Metro: Renton will actively seek to protect Rapid Ride “I” Line and Renton-Kent-Auburn Area Mobility Plan (RKAAMP) funding for Metro, and will work to ensure that areas such as South King County that are particularly transit-dependent will be the beneficiaries of having an “equity lens” shone on “Metro Connects,” mobility framework, and service-guidelines-update processes. Sound Transit: Renton will actively seek to ensure that Interstate 405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) stays fully funded and on a 2024 delivery schedule as ST goes through its “Realignment Process” in the wake of COVID-19 impacts. The City also will look to ensure Light Rail Transit extensions to Renton are actively studied, that the City and ST work closely together on I-405/SR 167 area bus improvements, and that structured parking is ultimately pursued for the I-405/44th BRT station. Puget Sound Regional Council: Renton will take an active role in pursuing PSRC federal pass-through funding that is made available within the region. Eastside Rail Corridor (“Eastrail”): Renton will work to ensure that funding and right-of-way easements are put in place to ensure Eastrail extends to the area including Southport, The Landing, and Boeing-Renton (including Cedar River and future Lake-to-Sound trail connections). Renton also will work hard to include and find funding for this extension in future state and federal transportation and “stimulus” packages. Affordable Housing/Homelessness Red Lion Inn De-Intensification Shelter: Renton will continue to work to find a permanent supportive housing relocation solution for the 235+ residents at the Red Lion Shelter. The City will also work with its local businesses and the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RFA) to maximize funding for the Renton community from the $500,000 COVID-19 emergency facilities “Mitigation Fund” established by King County. Sunset Area: Renton will partner with the Renton Housing Authority, the South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership (SKHHP), the Microsoft Corporation, and other community partners to put significant investment into quality affordable housing projects and to enhance funding where possible. Homeless Shelters, Feeding Program: The City will continue with a strategy of facilitating efforts that allow non-profit and faith-based organizations to supplement existing shelter space for the homeless. Additionally, the City will work to find a permanent site for the feeding program and cold- weather shelter services that are being displaced from the old Chamber Building (“300 Building”) within the Renton Airport. Parks, Trails, Youth Services, and Open Space Family First Community Center: Renton will continue to explore all possible outside funding options for the Family First Community Center (FFCC), including the possibility of dollars from the Puget Sound Taxpayer Accountability Act (PSTAA) monies that King County will be receiving as a result of the 2015 “Connecting Washington” package. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Countywide Parks Levy: Renton will actively work to assure Soos Creek Trail and Eastrail funds within the 2019 voter-approved levy are put to use, and will strive to protect grant funding programs for cities in their local parks, pool facilities, etc. Flood Control Project needs: Renton will continue to pursue future funds through the Flood Control Zone District (FCZD) for next-phase projects identified in the Cedar River Capital Investment Strategy, Renton Levee Certification, the Lower Cedar River Feasibility Study, and Lower Cedar River Maintenance Dredging. Additionally, the City will work with area County Council Members to expedite funding for the Black River Pump Station replacement project. Public Safety – including Mental Health Services, Regional Homelessness Authority Regional Initiatives, Task Forces, Etc: Renton will be a regular and active participant in regional efforts involving mental health, homelessness, drug enforcement, intervention to address opioid addiction, gang prevention, natural disaster response, and more. Racial Justice and Equity Seeking out Funding and Tools: Renton has heard calls for the City to invest significant funding into programs to bolster opportunities for communities of color and under-served communities. While COVID-19 induced impacts have left a projected $16.9 million hole in the City’s 2021-22 Operating Budget, Renton will actively seek out regional, state, and federal funding opportunities; collaborate with the Renton Regional Community Foundation; and evaluate ways to leverage new funding under the House Bill 1590 statute (1/10th of 1 cent sales tax for affordable housing and related services), as tools to build up funds that can enable increased human services funding, provide start-up dollars for programs that give new opportunities to people of color, and address early crises in affordable housing that will come when the Governor’s eviction moratorium is lifted at the end of 2020. Human Services Potential Funding: The City will work closely with non-profit organizations, faith-based entities and others to pursue human services funding that benefits the Renton community, including ways to access the Veterans, Seniors, and Human Services Levy (VSHSL), “Best Starts for Kids,” and other available funding streams. Arts and Culture Build 4Culture: Renton will establish an inventory of projects throughout the community to ensure that the City’s arts and cultural organizations are regularly and assertively seeking funds through Build 4Culture and other available pots of funding. Solid Waste Cedar Hills Regional Landfill -- Facilities Support and Operations Center: Renton will continue to express strong concerns over the “Option 3” possibility of locating the Facilities Support and Operations Center in the Highlands neighborhood. The City believes that with a minimal ‘buffer’ to protect this facility from nearby neighborhoods, and with significant noise, traffic, and safety issues, King County Solid Waste would be ill-advised to pursue Option 3. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Water/Reclaimed Water Use of Reclaimed Water: Renton has a seat at the table for regional discussions among King County, Seattle, Cascade Water Alliance, and suburban-cities interests as to how, where, and under what conditions reclaimed water should be marketed and sold in local communities. The City wants to ensure financial interests of municipal utilities, and overall water quality, are adequately protected. Energy/Green Power Puget Sound Energy “Green Power” and “Green Direct” programs: Renton will work closely with PSE to ensure Renton residents and businesses are aware of and educated on the benefits of the Green Power program, and that the City can be poised to enroll in the third phase of the closely- related “Green Direct” program targeted at corporate and municipal customers. City of Renton 2021 Federal Affairs Agenda COVID-19 Revenue Relief: Renton will continue to work closely with its U.S. Senators and Members of Congress, the National League of Cities (NLC), the Association of Washington Cities (AWC), and others to push for direct and flexible revenue relief for states and local governments as part of the next COVID-19 relief package passed by Congress. The relief must allow state and local governments the flexibility to use funds to address COVID-19 caused revenue losses. Stimulus Package: Renton strongly believes that as part of any COVID-19 economic recovery actions contemplated by Congress, a “stimulus” package would be particularly effective in ensuring ready-to- build infrastructure projects can go forward and put contractors and builders to work. The City has compiled a list of likely ‘stimulus’ projects that includes City bridges (includes the Niles Bridge), downtown utility upgrades, and the Family First Community Center. Transportation/Transit Infrastructure: Renton will seek to ensure that the next update to the Federal Transportation Act includes needed increases in funding for Washington State – and that Congress preserves funding streams for public transit providers and for Sound Transit, including Federal Full Funding Agreements (FFAs). Racial Justice and Equity -- Seeking out Funding and Tools: Renton has heard calls for the City to invest significant funding into programs to bolster opportunities for communities of color and under- served communities. While COVID-19 induced impacts have left a projected $16.9 million hole in the City’s 2021-22 Operating Budget, Renton will actively seek out regional, state, and federal funding opportunities; collaborate with the Renton Regional Community Foundation; and evaluate ways to leverage new funding under the House Bill 1590 statute (1/10th of 1 cent sales tax for affordable housing and related services), as tools to build up funds that can enable increased human services funding, provide start-up dollars for programs that give new opportunities to people of color, and address early crises in affordable housing that will come when the Governor’s eviction moratorium is lifted at the end of 2020. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) Renton Airport: Renton will work to access Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds for Renton Airport infrastructure needs – including airport assistance grants and FEMA pre-disaster mitigation monies for a new control tower. Renton also supports continued by-contract-tower funding and federal actions to ensure these “by-contract” air traffic control towers can hire and retain well-trained controllers. Sunset Area Transformation: Renton will work closely with the Renton Housing Authority and other community partners to evaluate – and pursue where appropriate – federal funding opportunities to enhance the stock of quality affordable housing in the Sunset Area. Family First Community Center: Renton will actively pursue federal sources of funding to help with both short-term capital costs and long-term operating costs of the FFCC. Grant Funding – FEMA, JAG Grants, Land Water Conservation Funds (LWCF), Etc.: Renton will work with its congressional delegation, community partners, and other local and regional agencies to consistently seek out and evaluate potential federal grant opportunities that could be value-added for the City. These include FEMA grants being pursued to ensure bank stabilization of the Cedar River and Cedar River Trail; Justice Assistance Grants for law enforcement; LWCF grants for parks and trails; and more. Protecting financial and bonding tools authorized at the federal level: Renton will support legislative initiatives put forth by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), including the protection of tax-exempt and bank-qualified Municipal Bonds, and “advance refunding” issuance of bonds. AGENDA ITEM #7. f) AB - 2768 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Amendment No. 06-20 to Lease Agreement LAG 93-004 with BHC, Inc. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Public Works Administration STAFF CONTACT: Manny Cruz, Airport Business Coordinator EXT.: 7478 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Amendment No. 06-20 to LAG 93-004 with BHC Inc. will have an annual revenue of $33,998.62, with scheduled increases based on the Seattle-Tacoma area Consumer Price Index-Urban (CPI-U) adjustments and an appraisal to determine the value of the 48,778.51 square foot parcel. SUMMARY OF ACTION: BHC, Inc. currently leases a 48,778.51 square foot parcel on the Renton Municipal Airport. Amendment No. 5 - 13 to LAG 93-004 established a rental rate of $0.62 per square foot for the period of October 13, 2013 through October 28, 2018, subject to a rate increase based on the Consumer Price Index – Urban for the Seattle- Tacoma area (CPI-U). The first such periodic adjustment was made as of October 28, 2018, for the ensuing 5 - year period ending October 28, 2023. The CPI-U of October 2018 compared to October 2013 was 12.36%. This resulted in a new per square foot rent rate of $0.697 ($0.62 x 1.1236) and a new annual lease rate effective October 28, 2018 of $33,998.62, plus leasehold excise tax. The new rental rate CPI was calculated in mid-2019. Following calculation of the new rate, the first billing cycle to which the increased rate could be invoiced was actually August 5, 2019 for September’s rent. The Finance Division then invoiced BHC, Inc. for the rental rate in arrears between November 2018 and August 2019. The back rent was timely paid by BHC, Inc. Due to staffing changes at the Airport, an agenda bill to adjust the annual rental rate has not been submitted to Council for approval until now. BHC, Inc. has fully and faithfully complied with all terms and conditions of the lease agreement making them eligible for a 5-year lease extension. Per LAG 93-004, BHC, Inc. is exercising their option to extend this lease agreement for a 5-year period that terminates December 31, 2024. BHC, Inc. is eligible for one additional 5- year extension period if they decide to exercise that option to extend beyond December 31, 2024. EXHIBITS: A. Amendment No. 06-20 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 06-20 to LAG 93-004 with BHC, Inc. The fiscal impact will result in an annual revenue of $33,998.62 with scheduled increases based on the Seattle -Tacoma area Consumer Price Index-Urban (CPI-U) adjustments and an appraisal to determine the value of the 48,778.51 square foot parcel. AGENDA ITEM #7. g) LAG 93-004 Amendment 06-20 Amendment to Lease Agreement LAG 93-004 1 City of Renton to BHC, Inc. AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (City of Renton to BHC, Inc.) THIS AMENDMENT to Lease Agreement LAG 93-004 is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties below. RECITALS: WHEREAS, BHC, Inc. (hereinafter “Lessee”) has a Lease Agreement with the City of Renton (hereinafter “Lessor”), LAG 93-004, executed on October 28, 1993, and subsequently amended (LAG-93-004, together with its amendments, is hereinafter the “Lease”); and WHEREAS, the initial term of the Lease terminated on December 31, 2019; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2.1 of the Lease provides Lessee with an option to renew as follows: “Grant of Option to Extend term: In the event that Lessee has fully and faithfully complied with all the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement, then in such event Lessor grants unto Lessee the right and option to renew or extend this Lease, under the same terms and conditions provided herein, for two further periods of five (5) years each. The first extended term, if elected, shall commence on the expiration of the initial term hereof and terminate at midnight December 31, 2024. The second extended term, if elected, shall commence on the expiration of the first extended term and terminate at midnight December 31, 2029;” and WHEREAS, in 2019, Lessee timely exercised its option to renew, and Lessor and Lessee otherwise agreed that Lessee has met the Lease’s requirements to extend the Lease term to midnight December 31, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Renton Municipal Airport is undergoing a Master Plan update which initially resulted in the Airport’s airport reference code increasing from B -II to D- III which carries additional design standards promulgated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), including a wider Runway Object Free Area (“ROFA”) centered over the Airport’s runway. Lessee acknowledges that, if imposed, the newly wider ROFA would encroach into a portion of Lessee’s premises, but Lessee has declined to reduce its premises to avoid such widened ROFA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Amendment #5-13 of the Lease, the Lease rental rate was established at $0.62 per square foot on October 28, 2013 for the period through October 28, 2018, subject to an increase after that date based on the Consumer Price Index – Urban, for the Seattle-Tacoma area (“CPI-U”), the first such periodic adjustment AGENDA ITEM #7. g) LAG 93-004 Amendment 06-20 Amendment to Lease Agreement LAG 93-004 2 City of Renton to BHC, Inc. to be made as of October 28, 2018, for the ensuing five-year period ending October 28, 2023; and WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee agree that the difference between the CPI -U of October 2018, as compared to October 2013, was 12.36%, and this resulted in a new per square foot rent rate of $0.697 ($0.62 x 1.1236) and a new annual lease rate effective October 28, 2018 of $33,998.62 for the 48,778.51-square foot premises, plus leasehold excise tax; and WHEREAS, as of November 9, 2020, Lessee had paid Lessor $76,369.95 in rent since October 28, 2018, and Lessee acknowledges and agrees that it owes and will pay to Lessor a backpayment for the difference in rent paid and rent owed since the October 28, 2018 Lease rate adjustment date; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree and acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic which was declared an emergency in the City of Renton in March 2020 has caused unanticipated delays in assembling a lease amendment to effectuate the extended Lease term and the new rent rate, but Lessee and Lessor agree that neither has been harmed by such delay so as to excuse future performance under the Lease; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED AND FOR OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE RECEIP T AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, LESSOR AND LESSEE AGREE AS SET FORTH BELOW: WITNESSETH: 1. The extension of the Lease term to midnight December 31, 2024 is hereby ratified. 2. Effective as of October 28, 2018, Section 3.1. of LAG 93-004 is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.1. Minimum Monthly Rent: Landlord and Tenant do hereby agree that Tenant shall pay to Landlord a Minimum Monthly Rent in the sum of two thousand eight hundred thirty-three dollars and twenty-one cents ($2,833.21), which amount is one-twelfth of the Total Annual Rent of $33,998.62, PLUS leasehold excise tax as described in Section 3.6. of lease LAG 93-004, without deduction, offset, prior notice or demand, payable promptly in advance on the first day of each and every month during the Term. All such payment sh all be made to the City of Renton, Attention: Fiscal Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057. The Minimum Monthly Rent is computed as follows: AGENDA ITEM #7. g) LAG 93-004 Amendment 06-20 Amendment to Lease Agreement LAG 93-004 3 City of Renton to BHC, Inc. Rental Payment Schedule 48,778.51 square feet @ $0.697 per square foot per year= $33,998.62 annual rent divided by 12 = $2,833.21 rental per month, PLUS leasehold excise tax. 3. Within 30 days of the date last signed below, Lessee shall pay to Lessor a lump sum equal to (1) the difference between (a) the amount du e to Lessor since October 28, 2018 under this Lease amendment and (b) the amount that Lessee paid to Lessor since October 28, 2018 and (2) leasehold excise tax on the difference. 4. All other terms and conditions of the original Lease (including amendments thereto), insofar as they are not inconsistent herewith, shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF RENTON BHC, Inc. a municipal corporation a Washington corporation By: By: Armondo Pavone Name: _______________________ Mayor Title: ________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: ________________________ Attested to by: Jason Seth City Clerk Approved as to legal form: Shane Moloney City Attorney AGENDA ITEM #7. g) AB - 2769 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Amendment No. 2 to CAG-19-313 with Otak, Inc. for the Monroe Avenue NE Storm Improvement Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Evans, Surface Water Utility Engineer EXT.: 7264 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Funding for this amendment in the amount of $558,917 is available from the approved 2020 and 2021 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budgets for the Monroe Avenue NE Storm Improvement Project (427.475494). This project is partially funded by $300,000 of Flood Reduction grants ($200,000 was received for Amendment No. 1 and $100,000 was received for this amendment), $179,072 of Sub-Regional Opportunity Funds from the King County Flood Control District and $279,845 from the Surface Water Capital Improvement Program. There is sufficient funding in the budget to cover this amendment. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The project’s 245-acre sub basin located in the Renton Highlands does not have an adequate connection to a downstream conveyance system or waterbody. Due to this deficiency and resulting flooding on Monroe Avenue NE, the city entered into an agreement with Segale for a temporary easement that allowed the city to construct and maintain an overflow system that discharges to their property at 301 Monroe Avenue NE. In 2019 Segale requested a special fill and grade permit in order to fill and redevelop their s ite, which indicated that the termination of the easement agreement is likely to happen in the next 3 -5 years. This would signify the loss of a critical overflow path that has played an essential role in preventing flooding on Monroe Avenue NE. This project is essential to design and construct a solution to replace the loss of the existing overflow system. In Phase 1, an alternatives analysis of solution elements was completed to select a preferred permanent solution to the flooding issue. This amendment covers Phase 2 of the project, which includes the engineering services required to complete the 30% design for the selected alternative, a 2-acre infiltration facility located at 301 Monroe Avenue NE. Tasks in this phase of the project include: • Topographic survey. • Groundwater monitoring and additional infiltration testing at 6 boreholes. • Hydraulic modeling of the water quality treatment system and infiltration facility. • Identification of utility conflicts on Monroe Avenue NE and coordination with fran chise utilities. • Environmental site assessment. • Preparation of a technical information report. • 30% design plans and construction cost estimate. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) The Surface Water Utility is currently in the early stages of negotiating a permanent easement with Segale for the construction and future maintenance access of the infiltration facility. Phase 2 efforts will begin after the permanent easement is executed. EXHIBITS: A. Amendment No. 2 B. Project Map STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 2 to CAG-19-313 with Otak, Inc. in the amount of $558,917 for phase two design services for the Monroe Avenue NE Storm Improvement Project. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR MONROE AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS THIS AMENDMENT, dated December 31, 2020, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Otak, Inc. (“Consultant”), a Washington corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Amendment as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Amendment is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. Whereas, the City engaged the services of the Consultant under Agreement CAG-19-313, dated September 30, 2019, to provide necessary services for the Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvement Project (referred to herein as the “Agreement”); Whereas, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement to change the scope of work, change the time for performance, and change the compensation in order to perform a preliminary (30%) design of the alternative selected during the alternatives analysis (Phase 1) of the project. NOW THEREFORE, It is mutually agreed upon that CAG-19-313 is amended as follows: 1. Scope of Work: Section 1, Scope of Work, is amended to add work as specified in Exhibit A-2, which is attached and incorporated herein. 2. Time of Performance: Section 3, Time of Performance, is amended pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit C-2. All Work shall be performed by no later than December 31, 2021. 3. Compensation: Section 4, Compensation, is amended so that the maximum amount of compensation payable to Consultant is increased by $558,917.00 from $227,537.30 to $786,454.30, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. The additional compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit B-2, which is attached and incorporated herein. 4. All terms of the Agreement not explicitly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect and such terms shall apply to Work performed according to this Amendment as if fully set forth herein. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) PAGE 2 OF 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Amendment as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Russ Gaston Vice President _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ Shane Moloney Renton City Attorney Contract Template Updated 01-15-2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 1 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak EXHIBIT A Proposal for Professional Services City of Renton Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Phase II – Design and Construction Engineering Services Otak Project No. 33201A November 13, 2020 Project Overview The City of Renton (City) selected the Otak Team (Otak), including Aspect, to provide design engineering services for the City Selected Preferred Alternative permanent solution, as Phase II of the project. The project will replace the existing stormwater overflow from the Monroe Avenue basin, which currently flows into a large infiltrating pit on a private property at 301 Monroe Avenue NE, owned by Segale Properties, LLC (Segale Properties). As selected in the project’s Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis, Phase II of this project will design new infiltration chambers and a water quality facility at the same site. During the Alternatives Analysis Phase I of the project, Otak presented six alternative solutions to provide flow control and treatment of stormwater from the 245-acre Monroe Avenue subbasin in Renton’s Lower Cedar River Basin. The alternative solutions centered around various conveyance and regional stormwater facility concepts, and is documented in an Alternatives Analysis Memorandum, dated August 11, 2020. On July 7, 2020, Alternative One was selected as Renton’s preferred solution. It includes Stormtech Chambers Infiltration at Upper Balch Pit with Surface Water Quality Treatment, and stormwater treatment. A key deciding factor of this treatment option is that it includes a series of treatment steps and design solutions that will create a progressive and robust treatment that will increase the lifespan of the solution. The selected alternative includes conveyance improvements to and from the site. The planned project schedule is to be complete within 8 months. A detailed schedule will be prepared and updated as needed as part of the project management task. PROJECT SCOPE The following scope of services for Phase II includes the planning and preliminary design of the selected alternative. 1. Project Management 1.1. Project Administration Otak will prepare and update a project work plan that incorporates and presents the planned and actual project schedule, staffing plan, budget expenditures, and percent of tasks completed on a quarterly basis, or more if needed. Otak will prepare and submit up to 8 monthly project status reports with monthly invoices. The status reports AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 2 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak will summarize tasks accomplished during the month, tasks projected for the next month, data needs necessary to maintain project schedule, any potential risks that could impact the project, and a schedule and budget status including the Earned Value (EV) of work completed to date. The monthly invoices will also include a contract budget summary including the percent of work completed, hours billed, and percent of budget spent and remaining for each task. Backup detail of individual hours billed will also be provided. 1.2. Project Coordination In this task, Otak will manage the work in this scope of services and coordinate the work with all team members including Renton staff and the Otak team including our subconsultant, Aspect. Note that coordination with stakeholder is included in Task 2 of this scope of services. 1.2.1. Coordination with City of Renton This task includes regular coordination between Otak and Renton’s project staff, including: 1. Informal email and telephone or MS Teams discussions with the City, assumed to be approximately one (1) hour per week between the City and Otak’s Project Manager/Principal in Charge (PM/PIC), Deputy Project Manager/Project Engineer (PE), and the lead Senior Engineer (SE) that will lead the preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates (PS&E). Technical discussions between the City and the project team will be charged to the task discussed. Informal discussions are assumed to have periods of fewer communications during periods of low work activity, depending on tasks being worked on that week. The Project Engineer will prepare all meeting agendas, and document decisions and action items from all meetings. Up to 16 bi-Weekly informal 30-minute project status report MS Teams calls. Otak will prepare a rolling forward agenda, summary meeting conclusions, and actions items to be completed by Otak and the City. This meeting will primarily include Otak’s PM, PE, and SE. If other project staff are invited to attend these meeting, they will charge their time to the task that they are working on to attend the conference call. Also, note that at times when the project is not having much activity such as when the project is in review, then these coordination meetings will be postponed. The Project Engineer will prepare all meeting agendas, and document decisions and action items from all meetings. 2. MS Teams kickoff meeting will be held at the start of this phase of the project to introduce Otak and the project to the City’s internal stakeholders. Otak will lead the discussion in project approach and specific key tasks, communication protocols that Otak will follow, and the project schedule. Up to eight (8) Otak team members are budgeted to attend this MS Teams kickoff meeting in including the PM, PE, SE, and Project Technical Leads (Senior Water Resources Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, hydrogeologist, and Hydrologic/Hydraulic modeler, and lead Engineering Designer/EIT, and Landscape Architect). The Project Engineer will prepare all meeting agendas, and document decisions and action items from all meetings. 3. Preliminary Design In-process Review Meeting at the Site. Otak will conduct one (1) two-hour project site review meeting with City staff to specifically review the In-process Preliminary (30%) Design plans, prior to completing the Preliminary plans, to assess how it would fit on the site, and discuss AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 3 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak any issues or concerns with the plan and the technical studies (geotechnical or hydrology and hydraulic) related issues. The site visit will include Otak’s PM, PE, SE, and the geotechnical engineer. 1.2.2. Otak Team Coordination This task includes 16 one-hour bi-weekly Otak internal project coordination meetings; only Otak’s PM, PE, PC will charge to this task. Team members that are currently working on a task, or about to start working on a task will attend these meetings, and these team members will charge their time for the coordination meetings to the task they are working on. Assumptions for Task 1: 1. This Phase II of the project will be completed within 8-months of the Notice to Proceed (NTP). 2. All coordination with Renton will occur using the MS Teams meetings program, phone calls and emails, but does not include in person meetings due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This also reduces the amount of travel time required for project coordination, and the budget for this task. 3. Project Management hours are for this Phase II work only. After completion of this phase an amendment will be developed for Phase III work, where project management hours will be added. Deliverables for Task 1: 1. Monthly invoices, status reports, and contract summary including the task budgets, percent of budget spent and remaining, and the earned value of work completed in dollars and percent of task budget. This will also be presented in a chart of the planned work progress (baseline), the actual progress, and the earned value progress on a monthly basis. 2. Meeting agendas and Summary notes of the discussion topics, questions asked, direction provided by Renton, and action items assigned to specific people and the schedule to address them. 3. An ongoing list of project Risks and Action Items summary table of needed actions to be completed, to whom the action is assigned, and the date that it is scheduled to be completed. This table will be added to during meetings with the City, Otak’s internal team meetings (after discussing with the City), and from any communications with stakeholder (after discussing with the City). 2. Stakeholders and Public Engagement and Outreach 2.1. Public and Private Stakeholder Engagement In this task Otak will support the City in preparing for, coordinating with, and presenting to the key project stakeholders identified by the City, including the general public and local community. Otak will participate in one (1) two-hour design coordination meetings with key stakeholders as a group. Two (2) Otak engineers, including the Project Manager, will attend these meetings, as well as a project assistant or engineering designer to record decisions and actions agreed to in the meeting. Otak will provide input on an agenda at least three (3) days in advance to all anticipated attendees. Otak will also record, prepare, and distribute meeting notes including a list of all action items, and responsible team members. Otak will prepare graphics of the basin characterization and relevant information from the project, that will help facilitate discussions with each stakeholder, and present or assist the City’s PM in presenting the project status, planned schedule, and project information relevant to the discussion topic, Otak will prepare meeting agendas and meeting notes. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 4 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 2.2. Segale Properties Segale Properties, the owner of the Upper Balch Pit site, will be engaged because the existing overflow pipes located on this site will be removed regardless of what additional facilities are constructed. A permeant easement will need to be negotiated and Otak will help the City in this effort. Segale Properties is attempting to redevelop the property for multi-family residential or mixed use. The City is seeking to negotiate a collaborative solution and time for the construction of the drainage improvements with the redevelopment of the site. For the selected alternative to be realized, effective coordination will be required between the City and Segale Properties. Assumptions for Task 2: 1. Renton’s project manager (PM) and staff from Renton’s Community Relations and Communications department will lead all stakeholder and public engagement, including coordination and communications with public agencies and key stakeholders. Otak will plan and conduct its activities in consultation with Renton’s Community Services and Communications staff. 2. The City’s lead staff will review and comment/edit on draft agendas and meeting notes prepared by Otak prior to scheduled meetings. 3. All coordination with Stakeholders will be will led by Renton, as noted in Assumption 1. This will occur using the MS Teams meetings program, phone calls, emails and written responses to Stakeholder comments, up to 30 comments from outreach effort compiled and screened by Renton’s PM, but does not include in-person meetings, due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This will reduce the amount of travel time and cost required for project coordination in this task. 4. The general public will also be engaged during the environmental review (SEPA) through notifications in the public comment period, see Task 2.1. 5. Renton will lead facilitation of the stakeholder and public meeting(s). Otak will assist the City in preparing meeting agendas, presentation material, talking points, participating and presenting in the stakeholder and public meetings, if requested by the City, and taking meeting notes on comments, decisions, and actions items from the meetings. 6. The City will lead all community involvement efforts, including discussions and meetings with stakeholders, and translating and printing of flyers, informational newsletters, signage, and all other public information, unless otherwise specified in this Task 2, for tasks that Renton’s PM has assigned for Otak to lead. 7. The City will create and manage a project website. Otak will provide graphics and project status summaries that are incidental to other tasks in this scope. 8. Assumes that the stakeholder comments will be compiled and screened by the City, and Otak will provide review comment responses to the remaining 30 comments with the budget in this task. 9. Renton will lead negotiations to obtain a permanent Easement to maintain the facilities on the Segale site, and temporary construction easements for construction activities beyond the permanent easement. Otak will support the property rights/easements by preparing easement descriptions as per Task 3.3. Deliverables for Task 2: 1. Meeting agenda, notes and coordination materials. 2. Public and Stakeholder Engagement meeting material including graphics developed as part of the technical task in this scope or the Phase I scope, and one (1) PowerPoint presentation, if requested given that all meetings are on MS Teams. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 5 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 3. Written responses to the consolidated and screened list of comments from stakeholders. 3. Survey and Basemapping 3.1. Topographic Surveying and Mapping Otak will create a topographic basemap in AutoCAD format appropriate for final design. The survey data previously collected for the fill operations will be integrated into the topographic map. The mapped areas include the following: a) Approximately 2,500 linear feet of roadway including utilities and storm drainage infrastructure (Monroe and Jefferson) where approximately 1000 linear feet of that survey is of Jefferson adjacent to the Segale Property, and the rest is Monroe between the intersections of 4th and 2nd; b) Approximately 1,500 linear feet of storm drain as-builts (2nd & 4th); c) and, Approximately six acres of adjacent filled areas for stormwater facilities (Segale property). Otak will field survey existing surface features including topography breaks, pavement and other hardscape, channelization and signing, significant trees and other landscaping, fences, invert elevations and pipe dimensions of existing storm drainage. Storm drainage and other utilities will be surveyed to the first structure or fitting outside of the area to be surveyed and mapped. A utility locate service will be retained to mark underground utilities. Utility as-built records will be researched and collected. Utilities evident on the surface and as located with paint marks by a utility locate service, will be surveyed. Base mapping in AutoCAD format showing the features outlined above; contours will be shown at one-foot contour intervals. Otak will reference survey and mapping for this project to the City of Renton horizontal and vertical datum. The City will be responsible for obtaining rights-of-entry on all affected parcels, which is expected to be limited to the Segale property. Otak will support this by identifying parcels where permission rights are needed. 3.2. Right-of-Way and Parcel Boundary Resolution A search will be made for property corners and right-of-way monuments in the project area. Any found property corners and monuments will be surveyed and protected until all survey information has been gathered as designated in this Task 3. Together with information obtained through field survey, research, and existing right-of-way information available through the City and King County, the right-of-way margins will be resolved and mapped with dimensions of record. The Segale parcel(s) will be resolved to a level of certainty appropriate for preparation of legal documents containing legal descriptions such as easements or right-of- way dedications. Adjoining property lines other than those listed above will be based on existing GIS data or information shown on tax assessor maps, and published Tax Assessor legal descriptions for exhibit purposes. 3.3. Easement Exhibits/Legal Descriptions Legal descriptions and exhibits shall be prepared as supporting documents for easements and/or right-of-way acquisitions. These properties will require a level of resolution based on field survey, vesting deeds, and other record information. We assume that up to two legal descriptions and exhibits shall be required for this project. Title reports for these parcels shall be supplied by the City. Assumptions for Task 3: 1. Renton will obtain all rights of entry needed to complete the design level survey and base mapping. Otak will assist the City by identifying all parcels that Otak will need access to. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 6 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 2. Renton will lead all negotiations in obtaining temporary and permanent easements. Otak will assist the City by defining the easements needed for this design, construction, and maintenance of the facilities in this project. 3. Otak will return to the site immediately prior to completion of 30% plans to map the current state of the fill area to allow for updated volume calculations. Deliverables for Task 3: 1. Base mapping in AutoCAD format showing topography, utilities, and existing site features as described above. 2. Parcel and boundary/right-of-way mapping as described above. 3. Easement exhibits/legal descriptions as described above. 4. Aspect’s Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Services The following proposed scope of services has been developed by Aspect to assist the Otak team during the detailed design of the stormwater system. This scope of services includes borehole infiltration test wells, performing infiltration well design modifications, conducting confirmation testing, mounding analyses, reporting and construction support. Based on Aspect’s discussion with Otak and the general subsurface uniformity encountered in previous borings and PIT completed by Aspect, see Table 1 for overview of the Phase I Geotechnical Investigation work completed (Investigation Levels 1-3), Aspect will provide design support for a 2.1-acre infiltration facility in the northwest portion of the Upper Balch Pit. Aspect’s geotechnical and hydrogeological approach in this task is a slight deviation from the City of Renton stormwater standard requirements, which indicate: (1) PITs are normally used to determine design infiltration rates; and, (2) a minimum of one infiltration test is required for each infiltration facility, with additional tests required for a large facility as is planned for the project. In the case of the Upper Balch Pit, the thickness and extent of recent fill which overlies the native outwash receptor unit, will make PITs extremely challenging locally. Therefore, in this task, Aspect will use borehole infiltration tests (and in later phases of work PITs), as specified in the following five sub-tasks: AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 7 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak Table 1: Levels of Field Conditions Inventory Level Hydrology Hydraulics Geotechnical Level 1 Qualitative Desktop Basin Characterization Completed in Phase I of project Desktop (GIS and studies by other) review and analysis. No modeling in this task, no field observations or verification Desktop (GIS and studies by other) review and analysis of. No modeling in this task, no field observations or verification Desktop (GIS and maps, previous geotechnical investigations data) review only, of, no field observations or verification Level 2 Basin Level Field Truthing of Desktop Data Collected for Basin Level Planning and Analyses Completed in Phase I of project Half day of field general observations per basin from public ROW Half day of field general observations per basin from public ROW Up to 5 borings at specific sites to evaluate feasible infiltration sites throughout the basin. Level 3 Reach or Site Level Field Measurements for Solution Elements and Basin Solution Alternatives Completed in Phase I of project Half day per contributing subbasin project to field investigate and verify basin boundaries from GIS data and identify surface water storage areas (ponds, wetlands, etc.) Half day per selected 500 ft of reach to field investigate including tape measurements of stream channels or drainage infrastructure dimensions Infiltration Test Pit at site being considered for infiltration facilities Level 4 Site Design Level Field Measurements for not overly complex or comprehensive Project Elements. Note: a QAPP may be required for this level Wasn’t included in Phase I of project – but is included in Phase II Building upon Levels 1-3 plus update contributing areas from the development of the project site Building upon Levels 1-3 plus a detailed survey of the project site, see Task 3 Building upon Levels 1-3 plus Pilot Infiltrating Testing (PIT), monitoring wells, and mounding analysis used for the selected infiltration facilities going to design. Note: PITs are not proposed as a part of this phase of work. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 8 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 4.1. Aspect Coordination with Renton, Otak and Stakeholders 1. Review the existing stormwater plan and site geologic and hydrogeologic data for the proposed testing locations and develop preliminary PIT and infiltration test well locations, design details and approximate testing flow rates to guide planning, installation, and testing work. 2. Develop an infiltration well installation work plan detailing the drilling, well installation, and confirmation testing procedures and the criteria that will be used. 3. Coordinate project administration and work activities with Otak, the City, Segale, and drilling and excavation subcontractors. 4.2. 30% Infiltration Investigation The infiltration investigation includes borehole infiltration tests/wells where the thickness of fill makes a PIT infeasible. If a substantial amount of the recently placed fill could be removed from the proposed infiltration facility footprint more PIT could be completed, and the number of borehole infiltration tests/wells could be reduced accordingly, providing savings to the project. However, this proposal is based on site conditions as they presently exist. 1. Well and Piezometer Installation a) Monitoring Wells Monitoring wells will be constructed at up to 6 locations within the proposed infiltration facility. Aspect will coordinate with Otak and Segale staff regarding areas where fill thicknesses are likely to be greater than 20 feet thick to where borings will provide efficiency for data collection compared to PITs requiring extensive excavation. The scope and budget assume one to two wells installed per day based on our previous borings south of the Upper Balch Pit. The subtasks include: 1) Coordinate and contract with a driller to install infiltration test wells under Aspect’s direction. 2) Secure, test, and calibrate groundwater monitoring equipment. 3) Observe infiltration well drilling and installation. Infiltration test wells will be installed at two of the four proposed stormwater systems following the approved infiltration well design/details and well specifications. 4) Confirm the soils encountered in the boring are similar to those previously logged by Aspect. If suitable, Aspect will approve the location and an infiltration test well will be installed. Aspect may modify the preliminary well design/details based on the boring data for use in infiltration well installation. 5) Install groundwater monitoring instrumentation. The infiltration test well borings will be advanced to at least ten feet below groundwater or into the contact with the underlying glacial till unit (approximately 30- to 50-feet below existing ground surface [bgs]). Aspect will make a manual measurement of the groundwater level at the time of drilling and will install a vibrating-wire piezometer to provide ongoing measurements of groundwater elevations. The instrumented boreholes will be grouted to approximately 25 feet bgs. Infiltration wells will be completed with six-inch, schedule 40 PVC wells casing, a 0.020- slot, ten-foot length steel V-wrap wire screen, and 6 x 9 Colorado Silica sand filter pack. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 9 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 6) Aspect will log soils encountered during infiltration well drilling, record infiltration test well construction details, and complete a daily field work summary at the end of each day, detailing the work completed, relevant observations, and the plan for the next day. Aspect’s field geologist will coordinate with the infiltration test well design team as needed during the drilling and installation process. 7) Collect soil samples for laboratory tests. b) Borehole Infiltration Test (BIT) will be conducted in each well to estimate the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the receptor soil. The well testing will include the following task: 8) Based on the final test well installation details, Aspect will update the testing plan as needed. The 2017 City of Renton and the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manuals do not provide guidance on BIT methods. Therefore, the BITs will be conducted in general accordance with the guidance and requirements in the 2016 City of Seattle Stormwater Manual. 9) Secure, test, and calibrate infiltration testing equipment as needed. 10) Coordinate with team members and site owner as needed to secure a water source, set up test equipment, and prepare for testing. 11) Aspect will conduct two (2) two-phase infiltration tests generally following the USBR Well Permeameter Method; consisting of a constant head test (Phase I) and falling head test (Phase II). a. Perform the test by adding water (obtained from a potable water source) to the test well to maintain a constant hydraulic head in the well. b. Monitor the flow rate with a flow meter or other method that is capable of measuring flow to within 5% of the total flow rate. c. Monitor water levels in the test well with a pressure transducer and datalogger on a maximum of five-minute intervals. d. Add water until the water level and rate of water added is constant (5% variation), or for a minimum of four hours. e. Once a constant rate is achieved, the Phase I test is complete. Begin the falling head portion of the test. Monitor water levels until the water level has fallen to less than 5% of the total head targeted during the constant rate portion of the test. f. In addition to the required wells, monitor groundwater elevations in nearby monitoring wells as available. c) Following testing, Aspect will tear down and clean-up equipment. It is assumed that the infiltration test wells will remain in place until a decision is made regarding: (a) the need for any retesting, (b) the need for any mounding analysis, (c) the potential to retain/enlarge the infiltration wells, and (d) the need to decommission the wells in accordance with State laws. 4.3. 30% Laboratory Testing and Analysis 1. Independent Laboratory Testing Soil samples retrieved from the soil borings and test pits will be returned to our laboratory for further examination and visual/manual classification. Soil samples will be tested by independent laboratories for grain size distribution with hydrometer and percent organic content and chemical analyses for cation exchange capacity and pH. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 10 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 2. Estimate Long-term Design Infiltration Rates Aspect will complete data reduction for the BITs to evaluate the preliminary long term design infiltration rate(s) for the site, with appropriate correction factors. At the completion of this task, we will relay our results to the Otak team relative to the City’s interest to use a design infiltration rate greater than 20 inches per hour. 3. Mounding Analysis Mounding analyses are required for a facility that receives more than one acre of surface water and has less than fifteen feet depth to seasonal high groundwater (as measured from the bottom of the infiltration basin or trench) or other low permeability stratum. Monitoring of groundwater over the wet season will be completed to evaluate the vertical separation from the bottom of the facility to seasonal high groundwater needed for groundwater mounding. 4.4. Reporting (Draft at 30%) Based on Aspect’s characterization of the subsurface conditions and infiltration tests, Aspect will analyze the data and summarize our findings in a report. The report will include the following: a) Exploration and well logs and a site plan showing approximate exploration locations. b) Discussion of the soils encountered and details of well installations. c) Laboratory test results. d) Groundwater monitoring results and considerations. e) BIT results and estimated bulk saturated hydraulic conductivity of the receptor soil. f) Preliminary Groundwater mounding results. g) Recommendations for the long-term design infiltration rate(s) and PIT program for 60%. 4.5. Environmental Due Diligence Services Aspect will conduct due diligence for the approximately 14-acre Upper Balch Pit Property (Property; King County Tax Parcel 162305-9059) to evaluate, identify, and investigate environmental conditions that may impact the future stormwater system construction work. The work of this task focuses on a combined Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a limited subsurface investigation, as warranted. 1. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Aspect will conduct a Phase I ESA in accordance with the guidelines prescribed in the ASTM International (ASTM) standard E1527-13 and prepare a formal report for Otak. The Phase I ESA will include the following: a) Conduct a site reconnaissance to observe and document current site conditions on the Property and activities at immediately adjacent properties. b) Interview the current owner(s), operators, and/or other persons known to have knowledge of the history of the Property, based on contact information provided by the client. c) Review environmental records for properties within the vicinity of the Property by obtaining and reviewing a regulatory records report. This report summarizes data available for the Property and properties located within distances of up to one mile from the Property with listings on local, state, and federal regulatory databases. d) Obtain and review reasonably ascertainable environmental records through a search of the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program Web Reporting Portal, which summarizes data and provides access to publicly available environmental documents for sites on AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 11 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak the CSCSL, HSL, No Further Action (NFA) Sites List, UST list, and LUST list. If deemed necessary based on information obtained from the Portal, review of environmental documents, reports, and records that can only be obtained through a formal request and review of hardcopy files at regional offices of the Washington State Department of Ecology. e) Review historical records, including archived tax assessor records at the Washington State Archives, historic aerial photographs, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and Polk City Directories. f) Contact government agencies, including local fire and health departments, to inquire about and review information in their records pertaining to the Property, if available. g) Prepare a report summarizing the results of the data research, site reconnaissance observations, interviews, and file review. The report will identify on- and off-site recognized environmental conditions (RECs) for the Property. h) Provide recommendations regarding further evaluation of RECs identified for the Property, if warranted. 2. Limited Subsurface Investigation Based on the results of the Phase I ESA, Aspect will complete a separate proposal with a brief work plan for a limited subsurface investigation and the time and materials cost estimate to evaluate RECs identified in the Phase I ESA. The scope of services for the limited subsurface investigation, to be confirmed or modified early in the work of this task, will include the following, with exact locations and depths to be determined based on the Phase I ESA results: a) During subsurface work described in Task 4.2, collect soil and grab groundwater samples from boring and/or monitoring well locations. b) Submit soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. c) Prepare a Limited Subsurface Investigation Report to document the results of the investigation. d) Disposal of investigation-derived waste generated during the subsurface investigation as non-hazardous waste. Assumptions for Task 4: 1. Aspect assumes the BIT during 30% design effort will be getting initial infiltration results to aid in the decision for 60% design when additional and more reliable PIT will be performed to help with the final design of the underground infiltration system. 2. Aspect’s scope and fee does not include obtaining and reviewing the title report/chain of title for the Property, unless provided by Otak or Renton. If needed, Aspect can provide these services, under a supplemental agreement that would draw upon the design contingency budget. 3. Aspect’s scope and fee does not include evaluation of potentially hazardous building materials (e.g., asbestos, lead-based paint, or mold). If needed, Aspect can provide these services, under a supplemental agreement that would draw upon the design contingency budget. 4. Aspect’s Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Services, Task 4, scope and cost estimate is preliminary and assumes a combined drilling effort with the work described in Task 4.5, collection of soil and grab groundwater samples and laboratory analysis of up to 18 samples for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs), which are commonly found in fill soil, and disposal of up to four drums of non-hazardous investigation-derived waste. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 12 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 5. Each boring location is suitable for installation of a test well. Additional borings due to encountering unsuitable conditions will require additional funds. 6. The City or Segale will provide access to water for drilling and testing. 7. The scope covers one infiltration test per well or pit. 8. Two soil samples per explorations will be submitted for grain size analysis (sieve and/or hydrometer) and two samples submitted for chemical analyses (CEC and %OM, or equivalent). 9. No review cycle on the Deep Infiltration Testing Report. 10. The scope does not include infiltration well decommissioning services. 11. Aspect will prepare permit applications on behalf of the City of Renton if required. Renton will submit the permit applications and pay associated fees as well as applications for right-of-entry to private property that may be necessary to complete the explorations. 12. Aspect will contact the Washington Utilities Coordinating Council One Call service to locate utilities at the proposed exploration locations. Aspect will also request the assistance of Otak and Renton to help identify any underground utilities to be avoided. 13. Aspect will hire an experienced drilling contractor to supply and operate the drilling equipment to complete the borings and an experienced earthwork contractor to supply and operate the track-hoe (or backhoe) to complete the test pit explorations. 14. The explorations will be observed by a geotechnical engineer or geologist from Aspect who will classify the soils encountered, obtain representative samples of the various soils, and develop detailed logs of each exploration. The samples will be sealed and transported to the Aspect laboratory for reexamination and testing. The explorations will be located in the field by pacing or tape measurement from existing site features. Using these techniques, the locations of the explorations will be established for presentation on a site plan which will be provided by the project team. 15. The borings will be backfilled pursuant to the procedures of Washington Department of Ecology (in place at time of project). 16. Otak will survey and map the location of the six borehole infiltration tests/wells where the thickness of fill makes a PIT infeasible (subtask 4.2.1). using survey grade equipment. 17. The boring explorations area may be backfilled with the soil derived from the area, and the backfill tamped in place with the backhoe bucket and smoothed. The backfill cannot be compacted to a density consistent with structural fill using the backhoe; therefore, the backfill may need to be removed and recompacted during site development, depending on location. The work areas will not be revegetated and evidence of the ground disturbance may remain following the work. 18. Renton will coordinate with and obtain right of entry and easement(s) from the property owner to provide access for design, construction, and maintenance of the facility. 19. A site map has been provided to Aspect by Renton and Otak. Aspect will review future design drawings of the selected facility alternative, the proposed private development of the Segale site and any street or utility project(s) proposed in the vicinity of the project site provided by Otak as the design progresses to 30% design. 20. The City will provide Otak and Aspect with one set of written review comments marked on one set of submitted documents at the 30% design level AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 13 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak Deliverables for Task 4: 1. Draft (for Otak and City review) Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report. Table 2: Levels of Technical Analysis Level Hydrology Conveyance and Storage Facilities Hydraulics Geotechnical Completed in Phase I of project Level 1 Qualitative Basin Characterization Uncalibrated and unrouted HSPF model Qualitative assessment based on Table 1 – Levels 1 or 2 hydrologic and hydraulic inventory data. No hydraulic modeling included. Qualitative assessment and mapping, in GIS, of potentially feasible infiltration sites based on Table 1 – Levels 1 field conditions inventory of watershed being considered. Completed in Phase I of project Level 2 Quantitative Basin Level Planning Analyses Uncalibrated HSPF model, stream system routing using simple hydraulic calculations (spreadsheet or model) SWMM, HY-8, or backwater spreadsheet to characterize water impoundments in basin GIS mapping in of potentially feasible infiltration sites based on Table 1 – Levels 2 on sites being considered for Solution Elements Completed in Phase I of project Level 3 Reach/Site Level Analyses for Solution Elements and Basin Solution Alternatives Uncalibrated HSPF model, stream system routing using simple hydraulic calculations (spreadsheet or model) SWMM/HEC-RAS modeling for stream routing (HSPF FTABLEs) and project development Estimated Infiltration Rates, based on Level 3 field conditions inventory Included in Phase II, not included in Phase I of project Level 4 Site Design Level Analysis for not overly complex or comprehensive Solution Elements Update Level 3 Uncalibrated HSPF based model (WWHM/ SWMM) hydrology with new storm conveyance system and facilities routing F-Tables Update Level 3 WWHM/SWMM modeling with final project development design for conveyance (flow splitters, pipes, structures, etc.) and Infiltration facility hydraulic controls. Calculated Draft Infiltration Rates for Selected Solution Elements, based on Level 4 field conditions inventory. Note: Final Infiltration rates will need to be confirmed with PITs. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 14 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 15 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 5. Preliminary (30%) Design 5.1. Update Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses Otak will update the WWHM-SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model, previously developed in Phase I Task 5.2 in of the project (Alternatives Analysis phase), that was developed to technical analyses levels 1 to 3, This task includes updating to a Level 4, as defined in Table 2, to size the infiltration facility, pre-treatment facility, and the conveyance system including hydraulic controls for final design of the facilities. Expected changes to the previous model(s) include: 1. Updating the Hydrologic Input into the Mounding analysis for project infiltration The mounding analysis, in Task 4, for the project infiltration facility is an iterative process where the storm water runoff hydrology is routed into the proposed infiltration facility, the hydrologic output (infiltration) is input into the mounding analysis to assess potential mounding impacts, this could also change the design infiltration rate, if mounding encroaches on the bottom of the infiltration facility. In this task, Otak will update the hydrologic and hydraulic inputs from the site improvements at the Segale property. 2. Update model with the final hydraulic controls to and from the storm water management facilities In this task, Otak will finalize the H/H model hydraulic controls to split flows to the infiltration facility, and to design a high flow bypass and drain the facilities for maintenance. 5.2. Technical Information Report Otak shall prepare a Draft Technical Information Report (TIR) for this regional stormwater facilities project, based on appropriate requirements set forth in the current Renton adopted and amended KCSWDM. The TIR will include in the appendices, summaries and supporting information of the Stakeholder and Public Engagement (Task 2), the technical investigations and analysis (Task 4 and 5), as well as, the 30% Plans in the Draft TIR. The Draft TIR/Design Report will include the following sections: 1. Project Information 2. Alternative Discussion 3. Design Criteria 4. Proposed Design Summary 5. Right of Way Considerations 6. Environmental Considerations 7. Permits, Approvals, and Mitigation Anticipated 8. Traffic Management During Construction 9. Cost Estimates 10. Appendices with the project special studies, plans, and detailed Cost Estimate 5.3. 30% Design Plans Otak will advance the storm water management alternative, selected in the Alternatives Analysis phase of the project, to a preliminary (30%) design level. The primary objective of the Preliminary Design is to allow Renton’s PM to confirm the technical feasibility, cost feasibility, compliance with permitting and grant requirements, and buy-in from Segale Properties. Otak will prepare and submit 30% Design Plans, listed in Table 3, that will include plan views of the infiltration AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 16 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak facility, and conveyance improves to and from the project site and facilities, it will also include sufficient details to illustrate how the facilities will operate and maintenance access will be provided. 5.4. Utility Coordination Utility Adjustments/Relocation Evaluation Otak will identify anticipated adjustments and/or relocation of utilities within the existing streets that will be used for site access and/or necessary drainage system modifications. Based on the existing utility records and/or utility-field locates, if available, identified conflicts with proposed street drainage improvements will be evaluated to determine if the drainage design can be modified to avoid any of the anticipated conflicts. 1. Obtain/compile existing utility data, for preliminary design Otak will initially coordinate and obtain records from utility companies to verify locations of existing facilities, on Monroe Avenue and on the Segale Property, and confirm agency requirements. Otak will review and compile the record documentation drawings and verify the utility horizontal locations surveyed and shown on the design base maps. Otak will retain a utility locate service to mark underground utilities for use in field surveying and basemapping utility locations. Otak will coordinate with Renton to field mark existing City utilities. Otak will assess existing water, sanitary sewer, power, and storm drainage pipes relative to proposed improvements and prepare preliminary plan identifying required relocations limits, adjustment locations, and where possible, present options for minimizing utility relocations/adjustments. This assessment will include providing a preliminary estimate of cost to underground existing overhead utilities, if needed and/or desired by the City. Table 3 – Anticipated List of Drawings Number of Sheets Footnotes Description Included in Preliminary Design (30%) Cover sheet, Vicinity Map, drawings, TOC 1 6 Legend and Abbreviations 1 6 General Notes, Phasing 1 6 Site Key Plan – Stormwater Facility Sheets 1 6 Survey Control Plan and Easements 1 5 TESC and Demolition Plans 2 3 Utility Relocation Coordination Plan and Details 1 2 Monroe Ave Trunkline Extension and Rd Restoration Plan and Profile 2 1 Site Access Road Plan and Profile 1 1 Site Excavation Plan 1 4 Infiltration Stormwater Facility drawings 2 3 Infiltration Stormwater Facilities Detail drawings 1 6 TOTAL SHEETS 15 Footnotes: 1.Single-Plate Plan & Profile drawings (Scale 20 H; SV) 2.Double-Plate Plan drawings (Scale: 20H) 3.Plan drawing (Scale: 20′ H) 4.Plan drawing (Scale: 50′ H) 5.Plan drawing (Scale: 100′ H) 6.Scale varies, and/or No Scale AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 17 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 5.5. Planning Level Construction Cost Estimate Otak will estimate quantities and develop an itemized construction cost estimate for one bid package using unit costs based on experience and recent similar project bid tabs. Quantities will be organized into standard bid items (supplemented by additional non-standard items, if necessary) conforming to the project bid schedule. The construction cost estimate will include appropriate contingencies to reflect the level of design complete. 5.6. 30% Design Review Otak will coordinate and facilitate with the City for one (1) two-hour meeting to review the Draft 30% Design Plans, Cost Estimate, and TIR. At the meeting, the City will provide Otak with comments to the Draft 30% Design Plans, Cost Estimate, and TIR. The meeting shall include, but not be limited to, discussing and reviewing the suggested revisions to these documents. Otak will assemble and submit interim progress submittal documents for review and comment. The City shall review and provide Otak a consolidated set of written review comments from all reviewers on a returned electronic form provided by the Otak. Otak will subsequently evaluate the comments and provide the City with written responses to each comment for clarification and concurrence. 5.7. Perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control Otak will implement Quality Assurance and Quality Control to provide ongoing review on all hydrologic and hydraulic modeling throughout the design of the stormwater facilities. Otak will provide quality assurance on all deliverable products to support this task, including work performed by sub-consultants, and submit quality control check-list for all analyses and documents produced in this Task 5. The Quality Review Checklist will be signed off by PM, Task Leads and an independent reviewer. Assumptions for Task 5: 1. The hydrologic models will include two scenarios, one without climate change and current landuses, and one with climate change and future landuses based on the built-out zoning data. 2. The regulatory landuse conditions (Forested) will not be modeled, as the infiltration facility is assumed to be able to infiltrate all flows required to meet flow control standards. 3. No structural retaining walls or footings are included in this scope and fee; adequate space will be available to grade construction slopes to a stable grade. 4. The Draft TIR submittal will be submitted with the Draft 30% Design Plans and Cost Estimate, developed in Task 5.2, and will include as a separate attachment, the signed QC checklist. 5. The Final TIR will be submitted with the 60% Design Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate. Otak will incorporate the approved responses and actions from the Draft TIR Submittal Review into the Final TIR. and will include as a separate attachment the signed Final QC checklists, written responses in tabular form to review comments on the draft submittal with Renton’s PM’s initials on each response that approves the proposed or City modify response and actions for each review comment. 6. No specification will be included in the Preliminary Design submittal. 7. No utility conflicts or adjustments will be required on the Segale Property. 8. Adjustments or relocation of franchise utility will be designed and constructed by the franchising public/private utility company(ies). AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 18 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak 9. Utility adjustments or relocations of Renton utilities will be identified in this task, but design of City Utility adjustment are not included in this scope or fee. 10. Utility Coordination or Conflict Avoidance, Renton will coordinate with Franchise Utility owners. 11. The Preliminary design will be based on the design concepts and layout of the Selected Alternative, selected in Phase I of the project. 12. Renton will consolidate duplicate comments, and approve or remove comments from all. 13. Minor changes to the concepts are expected during the Preliminary Design review to accommodate permit requirements and review comments, and the City approved changes will be incorporated into the 60% Design. 14. Major changes to the design concept could be the result of significant changes in site conditions such as 1) the Segale Property is found to have wetlands or contaminated soils that would be impacted during construction, 2) Segale Properties does not provide a Letter of Agreement and a Maintenance Easement for this project, 3) The hydrogeologic investigations uncovers subsurface conditions that significantly impacts the design infiltration rate and/or ground water mounding impacts. 15. Major design conceptual changes from the Selected Alternative, from Phase I, is not included in this scope and fee estimate. If major changes are required to the concepts or layout of the Preliminary Design, then Otak will assess the impact of the City required or desired changes, develop and submit contract supplement, with the scope and fee estimate needed to revise the design submit, and a request to Renton for approval to use the Design Continency to revise the Preliminary Design per the attached supplement. Otak will not proceed to Final Design before Renton approves the supplement or provide clarifying direction on how to proceed with the design. Deliverables for Task 5: 1. Draft TIR, three paper copies (upon request); one in MS Word; and one PDF copy. 2. Electronic copies of all hydrologic and hydraulic models will be included in an appendix of the Draft TIR report with a summary of the model input and output and model analysis. 3. 30% Design Plans, as listed in Table 3, will be prepared in AutoCADD, and submitted as three paper full- size (upon request), and one PDF half-sized. 4. 30% Cost Estimate submittal includes three paper copies (upon request), and one MS Excel file copy. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND PERMIT SUPPORT Otak will lead the project environmental documentation and permitting process, including developing the permitting strategy, identifying required environmental documentation, coordinating with regulatory agencies if necessary, and preparing environmental studies and the final permit applications. A review of historical aerial photography and land use records indicates the Upper Balch Pit was a permitted sand/gravel pit from 1962 to 1982, and has been reclaimed since 1982 and repurposed for stormwater management. Previous studies have indicated no wetlands on site, but that surface ponding may occur during wet months. However, the National Wetland Inventory maps a wetland in the center of the pit. To support the land use applications necessary for construction, Otak shall: 6.1. Conduct Site Investigation and Prepare Critical Areas Memorandum Two (2) Otak biologists shall conduct one (1) two-hour site visit plus travel to document existing conditions and the absence of regulated critical areas on site. Baseline environmental data will be collected to prepare a Technical Memorandum documenting the results. Critical areas covered under this scope of services include AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Scope of Services (continued) K:\Project\33200\33201A\Contract\Supplement 2 - Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements - Phase 2 (Design and CM)\Amendment 2\20_1113\33201 Monroe Ave NE SOW 11.13.2020.docx City of Renton 19 Monroe Avenue NE Storm System Improvements Otak wetlands, watercourses, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs), flood hazard areas, and well-head protection areas. Wetland and watercourse identification will follow federal and state manuals for consistency with City of Renton Municipal Code. Critical areas are not anticipated to occur on site, but documentation of their absence will be necessary for land use submittals and for compliance with SEPA. 6.2. Prepare Draft SEPA Checklist Otak will prepare the SEPA Checklist required to accompany land use permit submittals. Otak will prepare a draft SEPA checklist for review by the City. Assumptions for Task 6: 1. Any aquatic resources (e.g., wetlands, ponds, watercourses) identified within the Upper Balch Pit site will be considered artificial in nature and created incidental to construction and/or site operations, and therefore not regulated by the USACE, Washington Department of Ecology, or the City of Renton per the city’s critical areas ordinance. 2. Critical areas covered under this scope include wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs), watercourses, well-head protection areas, and flood hazard areas. Steep slopes will be addressed under the geotechnical scope of services. 3. The project will be issued a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance threshold determination by the City of Renton (lead agency), and will not require the preparation of a mitigation plan or an EIS. 4. This scope of services does not include amendments to the City’s NPDES permit for stormwater discharges. Deliverables for Task 6: 1. Critical Areas Memorandum. 2. Draft SEPA Checklist. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) City of Renton Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvement Phase II Fee Estimate Summary of Otak, Inc. and all subconsultants Otak Project # 33201a Task Description Otak Total Hours Total Budget by Task Task 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Subtask 1.1 Project Administration 216 216 $27,325 Subtask 1.2 Project Coordination 140 140 $20,995 Task 2.0 STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH Subtask 2.1 Public and Private Stakeholder Engagement 80 80 $12,010 Subtask 2.2 Segale Properties 110 110 $16,275 Task 3.0 SURVEY AND BASEMAPPING Subtask 3.1 Topographic Surveying and Mapping 197 197 $26,330 Subtask 3.2 Right-of-Way and Parcel Boundary Resolution 97 97 $12,670 Subtask 3.3 Easement Exhibits/Legal Descriptions 77 77 $11,530 Task 4.0 ASPECT'S GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES Subtask 4.1 Aspect Coordination with Renton, Otak and Stakeholders 0 0 Subtask 4.2 30% Infiltration Investigation 17 17 $3,270 Subtask 4.3 30% Laboratory Testing and Analysis 0 0 Subtask 4.4 Reporting (Draft at 30%)45 45 $8,095 Subtask 4.5 Environmental Due Diligence Services 17 17 $2,625 Task 5.0 PRELIMINARY (30%) DESIGN Subtask 5.1 Update Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses 225 225 $30,410 Subtask 5.2 Technical Information Report 145 145 $19,540 Subtask 5.3 30% Design Plans 1090 1090 $135,900 Subtask 5.4 Utility Coordination Utility Adjustments/Relocation Evaluation 24 24 $3,320 Subtask 5.5 Planning Level Construction Cost Estimate 102 102 $13,830 Subtask 5.6 30% Design Review 8 8 $1,330 Subtask 5.7 Perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control 105 105 $15,275 Task 6.0 ENVIROMENTAL SERVICES AND PERMIT SUPPORT Subtask 6.1 Conduct Site Investigation and Prepare Critical Areas Memorandum 60 60 $7,535 Subtask 6.2 Prepare Draft SEPA Checklist 65 65 $7,995 Task 7.0 MANAGEMENT RESERVE $25,000 Total Hours 2820 2820 Total Labor Cost $376,260 Direct Expenses- with 3% markup $11,288 Subconsultant Administration - with 10 % markup $13,306 Subtotal Project Cost Management Reserve $25,000 Aspect Consulting $133,063 Project Total $558,917 Note: 2. Aspect Subconsultant Fee included as Subtotal, not reflected by hours per task. Otak hours have been included in Task 4, as shown above. 1. LOE numbers shown are for estimating purposes only. Actual Otak or Aspect staff personnel may vary based on staff availability, classification, and category changes throughout the project duration. Otak invoices will reflect actual staff rate per labor classifications provided as part of this exhibit. EXHIBIT B-2 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) Contract Development Schedule Start Finish 1. Contract Process Negotiate Scope and Level of Effort 11/4/2020 1/1/2021 Notice to Proceed (NTP)1/1/2021 Project Schedule Task 1. Project Management 1/1/2021 7/30/2021 Project Administration Monthly Progress Reports Invoices and Billings Project Coordination Coordination with City of Renton Bi-Weekly Informal Project Status Report MS Team Meeting W/ City Staff Bi-Weekly Informal 30-Minute Project Status Report MS Team Calls MS Teams Kick-Off Meeting Preliminary Design In-Process Review Meeting On-Site Task 2. Stakeholders and Public Engagement and Outreach 2/1/2021 4/1/2021 Public and Private Stakeholder Engagement Segale Properties Task 3. Survey and Basemapping 1/15/2021 3/1/2021 Topographic Surveying and Mapping Right-of Way and Parcel Boundary Resolution Easement Exhibits/Legal Descriptions Task 4. Aspect's Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Services 2/1/2021 4/1/2021 Aspect Coordination with Renton, Otak and Stakeholders 30% Infiltration Investigation 30% Laboratory Testing and Analysis Environmental Due Diligence Services Draft Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report 3/11/2021 4/1/2021 Task 5. Preliminary (30%) Design 2/1/2021 7/30/2021 Update Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses 2/1/2021 2/15/2021 Draft Technical Information Report (TIR)2/15/2021 6/15/2021 Utility Coordination Utility Adjustments/Relocation Evaluation 3/1/2021 4/1/2021 Perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control 2/1/2021 7/30/2021 Draft 30% Design Plans and Cost Estimate 4/1/2021 6/15/2021 30% Design Review 6/15/2021 6/30/2021 30% Design Review Comment Meeting 6/30/2021 6/30/2021 Final 30% Design Plans, Cost Estimate, and TIR 6/30/2021 7/30/2021 Task 6. Environmental Services and Permit Support 5/1/2021 7/1/2021 Conduct Site Investigation and Prepare Critical Areas Memorandum 5/1/2021 7/1/2021 Prepare Draft SEPA Checklist 6/1/2021 7/1/2021 Dates Contract and Project Schedule Monroe Ave NE Storm System Improvements Phase II - Design Services EXHIBIT C-2 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) 0 1,250 2,500625Feet ± VICINITY MAP Le gend Proposed Infiltration Facility Drainage Basin Boundary Streams Parcels Existing Storm Structure Existing Storm Pipe 301 Monroe Ave NE(U pper Balch Pit) NE 4TH ST Drainag e Ba sin(2 45 Acres) Drainag e Ba sin(2 45 Acres) Renton City Limits Green wood Memorial Park NE 2ND STMONROE AVE NENE 6TH ST NE 8TH ST NE 10TH ST QUEEN AVE NEUNION AVE NEKC ACCESS RDJEFFERSON AVE NEKing CountyDepartment of Transportation King CountyRenton Transfer Center King CountyParks and Recrea tio n City of R entonPublic Wo rks Maintena nce Sh ops Existing 18 " an d 2 4"Stormwater O verflow Pipes Location of Floo dingand Ero sion Proble m King CountyCommunity an d Emerge ncy Cen te r 36" PerforatedInfiltration Pipe 48" PerforatedInfiltration Pipe Prop osed Facility Location NE 3RD STCedar River Groun dwaterFlowpath Ap proximate StormNetwork Flow Prop osed Storm Conveyance Pipe AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AB - 2759 City Council Regular Meeting - 07 Dec 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-139 with Osborn Consulting, Inc. for the SE 172nd Street and 125th Avenue SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Utilities Committee DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Evans, Surface Water Utility Engineer EXT.: 7264 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Funding for Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-139 with Osborn Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $128,582 is available from the approved 2020 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budget for the SE 172nd Street and 125th Avenue SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Project (427.475504). This project is partially funded ($250,000) by Ecology Water Quality Grant Agreement WQSWPC-2016-Renton-00058. The remaining portion of the project is funded by the Surface Water Capital Improvement Program. There is sufficient funding in the budget to cover this amendment. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The SE 172nd Street and 125th Avenue SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Design Project provides water quality treatment for over two acres of untreated roadway within the Cascade neighborhood using bioretention, engineered water filtration (Filterra units) and pervious concrete sidewalks. The project also implements storm system improvements to replace aging infrastructure and convey stormwater in the public right-of-way rather than through private residential properties, thus reducing private property flo oding potential. The original contract agreement included engineering design (30%, 60%, and 90%), geotechnical services, surveying and environmental review. This amendment will complete the project design and cover additional design and survey work, utility potholing and 100% plans, specifications and cost estimate. This amendment also expands the project area of the original agreement to include design of a stormwater system along SE 170th Place to address drainage problems in the vicinity of the proje ct area. This storm system would pick up runoff that currently flows through a private channel and has flooded multiple private properties during large rain events over the last decade. Amendment No. 1 also increases the budget of the design work perfo rmed under the original agreement. Design costs exceeded the budget of the original agreement due to a change in the design approach to add a collection system for treated runoff, in addition to the bypass system for the untreated offsite flows. This approach was found to be more cost effective because it would reduce the number of treatment facilities to be constructed and reduce the project construction and maintenance costs. A higher than anticipated number of comments from the Department of Ecology and the ensuing revisions and coordination effort also contributed to the higher design costs. EXHIBITS: AGENDA ITEM #7. i) A. Amendment No. 1 B. Project Map STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-139 with Osborn Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $128,582 for additional design services for the SE 172nd Street and 125th Avenue SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Project. AGENDA ITEM #7. i) AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE SE 172ND ST AND 125TH AVE SE GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN PROJECT (SWP-27-4037) THIS AMENDMENT, dated November 30, 2020, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Osborn Consulting, Inc. (“Consultant”), a Washington corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Amendment as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Amendment is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. Whereas, the City engaged the services of the Consultant under Agreement CAG-19-139, dated April 1, 2019, to provide necessary services for the SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Design Project (referred to herein as the “Agreement”); Whereas, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement to change the scope of work, change the time for performance, and change the compensation increased by $128,582.00. NOW THEREFORE, It is mutually agreed upon that CAG-19-139 is amended as follows: 1. Scope of Work: Section 1, Scope of Work, is amended to add work as specified in Exhibit A-1, which is attached and incorporated herein. 2. Time of Performance: Section 3, Time of Performance, is amended pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit C-1. All Work shall be performed by no later than June 30, 2022. 3. Compensation: Section 4, Compensation, is amended so that the maximum amount of compensation payable to Consultant is increased by $128,582 from $257,889 to $386,471, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. The additional compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit B-1, which is attached and incorporated herein. 4. All terms of the Agreement not explicitly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect and such terms shall apply to Work performed according to this Amendment as if fully set forth herein. AGENDA ITEM #7. i) PAGE 2 OF 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Amendment as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Robert Parish Vice President _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ Shane Moloney Renton City Attorney Contract Template Updated 01-15-2020 Clb 10-28-20 725 AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project – Amendment No. 1 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK – AMENDMENT NO. 1 Project: SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE Green Stormwater Infrastructure Design Project PRIME Consultant: Osborn Consulting, Inc. Contract No.: SWP-27-4037 Background The Project will plan and design stormwater system modifications and green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) to improve water quality and drainage capacity for approximately half a block (600 ft) north of SE 172nd Street for 122nd Ave SE, 123rd Ave SE, 124th Ave SE and 125th Ave SE, and approximately two blocks (1,400 ft) of SE 172nd Street. Runoff from these streets are currently collected and conveyed east through private parcels and south within street right-of-way into a storm system on SE 172nd Street where it discharges into a wetland located approximately 150 feet south of the intersection of 127th Ave SE and SE 172nd Street. This runoff eventually flows into Big Soos Creek, a Category 5, 303(d) listed waterbody for dissolved oxygen, ammonia, and pH. The Project will consist of installing a new conveyance system and green infrastructure, such as bioretention and pervious concrete sidewalks supplemented with GULD facilities to collect and treat stormwater runoff from approximately 2 acres of pollution generating impervious surfaces. The project design and deliverable will meet the requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Water Quality Stormwater Pre-Construction Grant agreement and follow the 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (2019 SWMMWW), and the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) as an amendment to the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual. This amendment extends the project schedule and adds work elements 8 and 9 with expanded project limits and site survey along SE 170th Place west of 122nd Ave SE to 121st Ave SE. Additional scope elements are added to Task 2, Data Collection and Review, and Task 6, 90% PS&E. The primary object of this amendment is to provide additional budget for scope added to the project. 1 Project Management $16,572 ($2,163)$11,322 $27,894 2 Data Collection & Review $80,216 $23,151 $23,764 $103,980 3 Environmental Review, Permitting & Public Outreach $11,259 $4,898 $0 $11,259 4 30% Design $31,350 ($1,192)$0 $31,350 5 Ecology Design Report/60% PS&E $51,962 ($17,865)$0 $51,962 6 Ecology 90% Design Package Submittal/90% PS&E $62,734 ($5,987)$63,396 $126,130 7 Ecology Grant Application Support - Upon City Authorization $3,796 $2,592 $0 $3,796 8 Drainage Revisions on SE 172nd Street $0 NA $8,624 $8,624 9 Ecology 100% Design Package Submittal/100% PS&E $0 NA $21,476 $21,476 Total $257,889 $3,434 $ 128,582 $386,471 Revised Contract FeesTaskDescriptionOriginal Contract Fees Budget Remaining Amendment 1 Fees AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project– Amendment No. 1 Page 2 of 6 Task 1 – Project Management Monitoring and communicating the status of the scope, schedule, and budget of this work assignment and providing monthly reporting to the City. Consultant Services Extension of project schedule through June 2021 for the 100% design submittal. • Prepare status reports describing the following: o Services completed during the month. o Outstanding issues (if any). o Scope/schedule/budget status. o A financial summary. • Prepare and manage Project Schedule • Attend two design review meetings, to discuss 90% and 100% Design review comments. • Bi-weekly PM Check-ins via web/phone • Invoicing City of Renton’s Responsibilities • Attend project comment review meetings (in person or via teleconference). • Review and approve invoices. • Review and comment on submittals within the schedule. Assumptions • Project duration will be extended by approximately 13 months. • There will be two design review meetings attended by up to three (3) Consultant Team members and City staff. Design review meetings to be held at Renton City Hall or via teleconference. Deliverables • Project schedule update to be provided with monthly status reports. • Bi-weekly check-in (as necessary and determined by City Project Manager prior to each week). • Monthly status reports. Task 2 – Data Collection & Review The Consultant will review available existing site data, provide site survey, limited geotechnical investigations and coordination of utilities. Task 2B – Topographical Survey The Consultant Team will provide the following services, required to complete Task 8: • Additional topographic survey of SE 172nd Street SE drainage. The survey limits extent along the SE172nd Street right-of-way from 122nd Ave SE to 121st Ave SE with topographic survey of the exiting drainage ditch along the south parcel line of property at address 12015, 12105 and 12113 on AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project– Amendment No. 1 Page 3 of 6 SE 170th Place. The survey will include the east side of 12015 and 12105 and west side of 12113 from edge of buildings to fence with property corners. The topographic survey will include: o topography o surfaces features o storm sewer conveyance systems o utilities based upon surface features, utility district provided as-builts and surface paint marks from utility locate services. • Prepare an existing conditions survey base map, showing a 1-foot contour topographic survey at a 1”=20’ scale. • Prepare an existing conditions DTM based on the topographic survey data. • Two-man field survey crews will be utilized to establish site control and perform the majority of the survey. • Surveyor will locate a sufficient amount of the existing right-of-way monuments to generate City street rights of way and platted lot lines. • Surveyor will engage ONE-CALL to assist with private/public utility location. • All field data will be processed in accordance with City of Renton survey and CADD standards and sent in AutoCAD as a block drawing. • The horizontal and vertical datums will be City of Renton (i.e. NAD83(1991) horizontal and NAVD- 88 vertical). • The topographic survey will be developed as a 1’=20’ scale file with one-foot contours, or as specified. City of Renton’s Responsibilities • None. Assumptions: • No additional wetland survey is anticipated for the drainage connection to the existing ditch. Deliverables: • Revision to stamped survey sheets for inclusion in plan set (PDF) • One survey exhibit for a proposed drainage easement from the existing ditch along SE 170th Place. Task 2C – Geotechnical Investigations No further geotechnical investigations or deliverables anticipated. Task 2D – Data Collection & Review – Utility Potholing Based on the 60% Design review, the Consultant has identified potholing needs and will coordinate potholing to be provided by a potholing vendor. Pothole locations will be documented by field survey. Assumptions: • Pothole quotes will be obtained from at least two vendors. Budget assumes up to five additional (5) potholes overall for watermains locations at $1,500 each, plus $1,000 for traffic control. Gas AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project– Amendment No. 1 Page 4 of 6 mainlines as assumed to be potholed by Puget Sound Energy (PSE) and provided to the Consultant. • Pothole vendor will obtain required permits prior to performing their work. The City will facilitate a quick permit review of right-of-way use permits. • Pothole vendor will provide their own traffic control. Deliverables: • Results of Potholing – Field Notes (PDF) • Updated Survey base map (in AutoCAD Civil3D format) Task 5 – Ecology Design Report/60% PS&E Additional tasks completed as part of the 60% Design are as follows: • One additional round of comment/responses for Ecology, including City review. • Revised 60% Design report to Ecology • Additional conveyance design for bypass flows • Backwater Analysis and additional SWMM modeling of proposed connections • Wetland Hydroperiod analysis per Ecology Review comments • Additional Flow Control design evaluation in WWHM 2012 for permeable sidewalks. • Additional scope added for ADA ramp options for City review. • Additional design sheets for plans than in the original contract • Cost for additional tasks of $19,057, covered with savings on the Task 2.C – Geotechnical Investigations with Infiltration Testing Task 6 – Ecology 90% Design Package Submittal/90% PS&E Upon receipt of an Ecology Design Report Acceptance Letter, the Consultant shall prepare 90% level plans, special provisions, estimate of probable cost, and an update of the project construction schedule for the Ecology 90% Design Package Submittal. Progressing the Design Report to 90% will be as follows and in accordance with the general assumptions listed in the original contract. Only revisions to the original contract are listed. 1. Additional 90% plan sheets. The list of plan sheets below will be added to the estimated sheet number from the original contract. These include the plans for the added drainage improvements per the selected alternative through Task 8, two additional proposed plan and profile sheets, and one additional existing conditions sheet anticipated for Task 8 design. Additional sheets listed were added for extents of improvements exceeding original contract estimated sheet total. • Existing Conditions (add one (1) sheet, seven (7) total) • TESC/Demolition (add one (1) sheets, seven (7) total) • Plan and Profile Sheet (add seven (7) sheets, fourteen (14) total) • Additional Roadway Sections • Sidewalk and Curb horizontal control points table (add three (3) sheets) • ADA ramp design and control points (add three (3) sheets) • Restoration and Landscape Sheets (add one (1) sheet, seven (7) total) AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project– Amendment No. 1 Page 5 of 6 City of Renton’s Responsibilities • City will provide input and review comments on the draft Design Report within the agreed upon schedule. • City to provide direction on landscape design requirements. • Other responsibilities same as original scope. Assumptions: • One round of 90% comment/responses. • Facility Operation and Maintenance Manual will be provided by City. Deliverables: • Ecology 90% Design Package Submittal (Draft and Final): • Draft SWPPP (PDF). Task 8 – Drainage Revisions on SE 170th Place Additional drainage analysis and design will be completed for the drainage ditch at noted flooding along the south parcel line of property at address 12015, 12105 and 12113 on SE 170th Place. This task will include: 1. Evaluation of topographic survey provided through Task 2B. 2. Site visit for up to two (2) consultant team members. 3. Complete a brief options analysis for review with the City Assumptions: • Selected improvements will be incorporated into the 90% construction set. Deliverables: 1. Brief memorandum of recommended drainage revision with pipe alignment and profiles. (PDF). 2. Selected improvements will be incorporated into the 90% plan submittal under Task 6. Task 9 – Ecology Final Bid Package Submittal/100% PS&E Progressing the design report to 100% design will be as follows, in accordance with the general assumptions listed below: 1. Respond to City’s and Ecology’s comments provided on the design report. (one round each). 2. Update 100% plans per these comments. 3. Update Engineer’s estimate of probable cost to match the 100% design 4. Update the standard specification to match the 100% design City of Renton’s Responsibilities • City to provide consolidated 90% review comments AGENDA ITEM #7. i) City of Renton SE 172nd St and 125th Ave SE GSI Design Project– Amendment No. 1 Page 6 of 6 Assumptions: • Minimal design revisions anticipated after the 90% submittal. • Re-packaging plans, cost estimates or specifications based on limited grant funding approval is not included in this scope. Deliverables: Ecology 100% Design Package Submittal (Final): • Engineer's 100% Construction Estimate of Probable Cost (PDF and Excel Spreadsheet) • 100% Construction Plans (PDF) • 100% Special Provisions (PDF and MS Word document) • Final Design Report (PDF) • City 90% Design Package comment response in MS Word document • Ecology 90% Design Package comment response in MS Word document AGENDA ITEM #7. i) Osborn Consulting, Inc. - City of Renton 172nd St and 151st Ave GSI ProjectEXHIBIT BFirm$0.00PICPM/Sr. PE Sr. PEProject EngineerDesign EngineerCADD Mgr CADDGraphic Design AdminSub Mark-UpHourly Rate$202.00$193.00$162.00$143.00$116.00$140.00$83.00$122.00$107.002.0%Project TasksTotal Hours 12 30 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 108$ -$ 11,322$ -$ -$ $11,322Total Hours 0 6 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 -$ 410$ 3,272$ 11,992$ 8,500$ $23,764Total Hours 12 68 0 132 180 8 84 0 0 -$ -$ 63,396$ -$ -$ $63,396Total Hours 0 12 0 20 24 0 8 0 0 -$ -$ 8,624$ -$ -$ $8,624Total Hours 10 24 0 48 40 0 40 0 0 -$ -$ 21,476$ -$ -$ $21,476Firm Subtotal:$108,090$11,992$8,500% of total budget:84%9%7%Total Budget:$128,582Task 9: Ecology 100% Design Package Submittal/100% PS&E Task 6: Ecology 90% Design Package Submittal/90% PS&E Task 8: Drainage Revisions on SE 170th PlaceUtility PotholesTask 1: Project ManagementTask 2: Data Collection & ReviewOCIClassificationCost EstimateHours EstimateDHA SurveyingCost EstimateExpenseP:\10-190002 City of Renton 172nd St and 125th Ave GSI\1 Contract\01 Scoping\Amendment No 1\To City\City of Renton 172nd St and 152nd Ave GSI_Amendment 1_ FeeEstimate_Exhibit B_202001027Osborn Consulting, Inc.Printed: 10/27/2020Page 1 of 2AGENDA ITEM #7. i) ID Task ModeTask NameDuration Start Finish Predecessors1City of Renton 172nd St and 125th Ave GSI576 days?Sun 4/28/19Tue 7/13/212Notice to Proceed0 daysSun 4/28/19Sun 4/28/193Task 2: Data Collection and Review421 daysMon 5/20/19Tue 12/29/204Data review and utility coordination25 daysMon 5/20/19Fri 6/21/195Topographic Survey416 daysMon 5/27/19Tue 12/29/206Site Survey10 daysMon 5/27/19Fri 6/7/197Amendment No. 1 Survey10 daysWed 12/16/20Tue 12/29/2038FS+10 days8Pothole Survey5 daysFri 10/23/20Thu 10/29/20149Geotechnical Investigations30 daysTue 2/4/20Mon 3/16/2010Geotechnical Investigation0 daysTue 2/4/20Tue 2/4/2011Draft Report15 daysTue 2/4/20Mon 2/24/201012Report Comments10 daysTue 2/25/20Mon 3/9/201113Final Report5 daysTue 3/10/20Mon 3/16/201214Utility Potholing4 daysMon 10/19/20Thu 10/22/2038FS+5 days15Task 3: Public Outreach456 daysMon 6/10/19Tue 3/9/2116Critical Areas Documentation10 daysMon 6/10/19Fri 6/21/1917SEPA20 daysWed 2/10/21Tue 3/9/214218Public Outreach15 daysMon 9/9/19Fri 9/27/1919Task 4: 30% Design43 daysMon 5/27/19Thu 7/25/1920Design Period26 daysMon 5/27/19Mon 7/1/1921Submittal0 daysTue 7/2/19Tue 7/2/192022Review Period by City15 daysTue 7/2/19Mon 7/22/192123Comment Review Meeting0 daysThu 7/25/19Thu 7/25/1924Task 5: Ecology Design Report/60% PS&E306 daysThu 7/25/19Mon 9/28/2025Design Period41 daysThu 7/25/19Thu 9/19/192326PS&E Submittal0 daysFri 9/20/19Fri 9/20/192527Review Period by City26 daysMon 9/30/19Mon 11/4/192928Comment Review Meeting0 daysWed 11/6/19Wed 11/6/1929Design Report to Ecology0 daysMon 9/30/19Mon 9/30/1930Ecology Review45 daysWed 11/6/19Tue 1/7/202931Design Report - Revisions0 daysMon 3/16/20Mon 3/16/2012FS+5 days32Ecology Review45 daysTue 3/17/20Mon 5/18/203133Design Report - Revisions45 daysMon 5/18/20Mon 7/20/2034Ecology Review45 daysTue 7/21/20Mon 9/21/203335Ecology Report Acceptance0 daysMon 9/28/20Mon 9/28/2036Task 6: Ecology 90% Submittal/90% PS&E188 daysFri 8/21/20Tue 5/11/2137Final Design Phase Scoping7 wksFri 8/21/20Tue 12/1/2038FF38Amendment No. 1 NTP1 dayTue 12/1/20Tue 12/1/2039Design Period97 daysMon 9/28/20Tue 2/9/2140Before Amendement No.148 daysMon 9/28/20Wed 12/2/2028,35,4741After Amendment No. 150 daysWed 12/2/20Tue 2/9/213842PS&E Submittal0 daysTue 2/9/21Tue 2/9/2139,32,7FS+30 days,3443Review Period by City15 daysWed 2/10/21Tue 3/2/214244Comment Review Meeting0 daysTue 3/2/21Tue 3/2/214345Design Report to Ecology0 daysTue 3/9/21Tue 3/9/2144FS+5 days46Ecology Review45 daysWed 3/10/21Tue 5/11/214547Ecology Report Acceptance0 daysTue 5/11/21Tue 5/11/2148Task 7: Ecology Grant Application Support15 daysTue 9/22/20Mon 10/12/2049Grant Support15 daysTue 9/22/20Mon 10/12/2050Task 8: Ecology Final Submittal/ Final PS&E46 days?Tue 5/11/21Tue 7/13/2151Design Period25 daysTue 5/11/21Mon 6/14/214752PS&E Submittal0 daysMon 6/14/21Mon 6/14/2151,4653Review Period by City10 daysTue 6/15/21Mon 6/28/215254Comment Review Meeting1 day?Tue 6/29/21Tue 6/29/215355Final Submittal0 daysTue 7/13/21Tue 7/13/2154FS+10 days4/282/47/27/259/2011/69/303/169/282/93/23/95/116/147/13Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4201920202021TaskSplitMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryInactive TaskInactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual TaskDuration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual SummaryStart-onlyFinish-onlyExternal TasksExternal MilestoneDeadlineProgressManual ProgressPage 1Renton 172nd St and 152nd Ave GSI Project ScheduleDate: Mon 10/26/20AGENDA ITEM #7. i) 4,514 376 SE 172nd St & 125th Ave SE GSI Project This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 11/5/2020 Legend 2560128 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Feet Notes 256 WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere City and County Labels City and County Boundary Parcels Environment Designations Natural Shoreline High Intensity Shoreline Isolated High Intensity Shoreline Residential Urban Conservancy Jurisdictions Streams (Classified) <all other values> Type S Shoreline Type F Fish Type Np Non-Fish Type Ns Non-Fish Seasonal Unclassified Not Visited Wetlands Network Structures Access Riser Inlet Manhole Utility Vault Clean Out Unknown AGENDA ITEM #7. i)   1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE  FOLLOWING INTERIM ZONING CONTROLS IN RESPONSE TO THE RENTON RED  LION COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER OPERATING IN THE CITY OF  RENTON SINCE APRIL 2020: (1) CLARIFYING AND MODIFYING PRINCIPAL,  ACCESSORY, AND UNCLASSIFIED USE REGULATIONS BY AMENDING  SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐050.A, 4‐2‐050.C.4, 4‐2‐050.C.5, AND 4‐2‐050.C.6 OF THE  RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; (2) CLARIFYING AND MODIFYING CERTAIN LAND USE  DEFINITIONS IN THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 4‐ 2‐060.K OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF  “DIVERSION FACILITY” AND REMOVING THE DEFINITION OF “DIVERSION  INTERIM SERVICE FACILITY” IN SECTION 4‐11‐040 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL  CODE, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “HOTEL” AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF  “HOTEL, EXTENDED‐STAY” IN SECTION 4‐11‐080 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL  CODE, AND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS”  IN SECTION 4‐11‐190 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; (3) ALLOWING FOR ONE  COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER TO TEMPORARILY OPERATE IN THE  COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) ZONING DISTRICT BY ADDING A DEFINITION OF  “COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER” IN SECTION 4‐11‐030 OF THE RENTON  MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐060.G, 4‐2‐080.A.71, AND  4‐2‐080.A.101 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; AND (4) ALLOWING FOR AND  REGULATING LAND USES SERVING THOSE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS BY  ADDING A NEW SECTION 4‐4‐045, HOMELESS SERVICES USE, TO THE RENTON  MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF “HOMELESS SERVICES USE” TO  SECTION 4‐11‐080 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; MAKING A LEGISLATIVE  DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FULL COMPLIANCE  WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (CHAPTER 43.21.C RCW);  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND  ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.   WHEREAS, in early 2020, the World Health Organization announced that the novel  coronavirus (COVID‐19) was a global pandemic, the United States Department of Health and  Human Services Secretary Alex Azar declared a public health emergency because of the COVID‐ 19 pandemic, and Washington Governor Inslee declared a State of Emergency due to COVID‐19;  and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, the Mayor proclaimed a local emergency due to COVID‐19;  and  WHEREAS, on March 31, 2020, King County’s Local Health Officer, Dr. Jeff Duchin, issued  a Local Health Officer Order (which Dr. Duchin amended on May 20, 2020) (collectively, the  “County Health Order”) authorizing King County to use only “legally available” resources to “de‐ intensify or reduce the density of existing homelessness shelters and encampments” in response  to the COVID‐19 pandemic, and further emphasized that the County Health Order did not  “authorize illegal means or behavior;” and  WHEREAS, on April 2, 2020, King County leased the Red Lion Hotel & Conference Center  located at 1 South Grady Way, Renton (the “Red Lion Site”), from the property owner Renton  Hotel Investors, LLC (“RHI”); and   WHEREAS, the Red Lion Site is located within the City’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning  designation, and is subject to City of Renton Municipal Code, including City zoning, land use, and  business use and licensing regulations; and  WHEREAS, on or about April 9, 2020, in coordination with King County and under King  County’s lease with RHI, the Downtown Emergency Service Center (“DESC”) began using the Red  Lion Site as a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter for persons experiencing homelessness (the  “COVID‐19 Shelter”).  DESC began using the COVID‐19 Shelter to temporarily house individuals  previously housed at its downtown Seattle Main Shelter, located at The Morrison Hotel. DESC  and King County decided to house these individuals in private rooms, rather than congregate  housing, where COVID‐19 could spread more rapidly.  DESC did so without coordinating with City  officials or City staff, and without obtaining City permits or obtaining a City business license; and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  WHEREAS, as described by DESC, the COVID‐19 Shelter operates as a 24‐hour shelter for  DESC’s clients experiencing homelessness, with a wide range of services including the provision  of meals, case management, and crisis intervention; and    WHEREAS, King County has represented that the maximum number of residents of the  COVID‐19 Shelter has been 235 individuals; and  WHEREAS, DESC has been continuously operating the COVID‐19 Shelter since on or about  April 9, 2020, in concert with King County, in contravention of City zoning and without City land  use or building permits or a City business license; and  WHEREAS, since the COVID‐19 Shelter began operating at the Red Lion Site, first  responders from the Renton Police Department and the Renton Regional Fire Authority have  experienced a marked increase in the numbers of calls for service to the Red Lion Site and its  vicinity, causing adverse impacts in the City of Renton; and  WHEREAS, City staff immediately made the following land use and zoning determinations  regarding DESC’s use of the Red Lion Site to deintensify congregate homeless shelters:  (1) the  only land use lawfully established on the Red Lion Site is a “Hotel” land use; (2) the COVID‐19  Shelter does not meet the Renton Municipal Code’s (RMC’s) definition of a “Hotel” land use (RMC  4‐11‐080); (3) a “deintensification shelter” is not among the list of land use types that is  recognized in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4‐2‐060 (Zoning Use Table)); and (4) the  potentially comparable land uses that are recognized in the Renton Municipal Code are  “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” or “congregate residence,” and that neither  of those land uses is allowed within the Red Lion Site’s Commercial Arterial (“CA”) zoning  designation.  These determinations caused City staff to determine that the continued use of the  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  Red Lion Site to house a homeless shelter operation is not an allowed land use on the Red Lion  Site; and  WHEREAS, City staff also immediately determined that the COVID‐19 Shelter had opened  without King County, DESC, or RHI having first applied for a City business license for the COVID‐ 19 Shelter operations, in violation of RMC 5‐5‐3; and   WHEREAS, despite City staff’s determinations that the COVID‐19 Shelter is not an allowed  land use on the Red Lion Site and was operating without a required City business license, the City  was willing to temporarily forbear on taking code enforcement action against the COVID‐19  Shelter if King County would enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the City  regarding the operations of the COVID‐19 Shelter and the duration of the COVID‐19 Shelter’s  operations at the Red Lion Site.  Accordingly, the City provided a draft MOU to King County in  April 2020, and proceeded to negotiate in good faith with King County regarding an MOU, but  King County would not agree to any MOU that committed King County or DESC to a timeframe  for relocating the COVID‐19 Shelter’s operations from the Red Lion Site to another location within  or beyond City of Renton limits that would allow for such a use under the Renton Municipal Code;  and  WHEREAS, on June 30, 2020, when the MOU negotiations had dissolved with no  commitment on the part of King County or DESC to relocating the COVID‐19 Shelter to a location  allowed by the Renton Municipal Code, the City had run out of alternatives to engaging in code  enforcement proceedings regarding the COVID‐19 Shelter.  Thus, on that date, the City issued a  two‐count Finding of Violation to King County, DESC, and RHI under code enforcement case  number CODE20‐000321 finding that (1) the COVID‐19 Shelter is a “land use not allowed in zoning  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  designation” (Violation 1), and (2) the COVID‐19 Shelter was “operating without a City of Renton  business license” (Violation 2).  Hereinafter, the Finding of Violation is the “FOV;” and  WHEREAS, King County and RHI both timely requested a hearing to challenge the FOV,  and the requested hearing regarding the FOV was held before the City’s Hearing Examiner on  August 14, 2020, with DESC also participating in the hearing; and  WHEREAS, in front of the Hearing Examiner, King County, RHI, and DESC took the position  that the temporary use of the Red Lion Site for shelter deintensification meets the RMC definition  of a “Hotel” land use.  They also took the position that even if the shelter deintensification use of  the Red Lion Site did not meet the definition of a “Hotel” land use, the Local Health Officer’s  authority under Washington law to protect the public from contagious diseases takes legal  precedence over and preempts Renton’s zoning and permitting laws; and  WHEREAS, for its part, in front of the Hearing Examiner, the City took the positions that  (1) the deintensification use of the Red Lion Site does not meet the RMC definition of a “Hotel”  land use, (2) the use appeared to most closely align with the RMC definitions for the “diversion  facility / diversion interim service facility” land use or the “congregate residence” land use, (3)  neither the “diversion facility / diversion interim service facility” land use nor the “congregate  residence” land use is allowed within the CA zoning designation (which is the Red Lion Site’s  zoning designation), and (4) the pandemic and County Health Order did not preempt the City’s  zoning and land use laws; indeed, the County Health Order expressly restricted King County to  using “legally available” resources and forbade using “illegal means or behavior,” which would  include the City of Renton’s legally adopted and enforced zoning, land use, and business licensing  laws; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  WHEREAS, by written decisions dated August 31, 2020 and October 2, 2020, the Hearing  Examiner ruled on the FOV (collectively, the “Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision”); and  WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision directed King County and DESC to choose  either to vacate the Red Lion Site within 60 days or to apply to the City for an “unclassified use”  interpretation in which the Department of Community & Economic Development (“CED”) would  determine if the COVID‐19 Shelter is allowed utilizing the criteria in RMC 4‐2‐050.C.6.a; and  WHEREAS, although the October 2, 2020 portion of the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision  confirms that the “unclassified use analysis . . . decision is left to City staff as governed by City  code,” the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision nevertheless projects that the outcome of CED’s  unclassified use interpretation will be to deem the COVID‐19 Shelter a “Hotel” land use, a “Social  Service Organizations” land use, or a combination of the two; and   WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision’s projections that an unclassified use  interpretation would result in a “Hotel” and/or “Social Service Organizations” land use  determination were based, in part, on the following assumptions regarding the intent of the City  Council:   Regarding the “Hotel” land use, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision states:    “The City has taken the strong position that the requirement in the hotel definition  that guest stays be “transient” means that stays must be 30 days or less. Although  the vast majority of hotel use may very well be 30 days or less, there is no basis to  conclude that hotels stays will not sometimes be longer due to exceptional  circumstances such as natural disasters and pandemics. The most compelling  reason to disagree with the City’s 30‐day interpretation is simply that the Renton  City Council didn’t expressly adopt a 30‐day limit for hotel stays. If the Council  wanted a hard and fast rule on the length of time that someone could stay in a  hotel room, it would have been exceptionally easy and clear to throw that into the  definition of hotel or transient.”  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  Cite:  Hearing Examiner’s August 31, 2020 decision, page 11, lines 22‐29 (emphasis  added).   Regarding the “Social Services Organizations” land use, the Hearing Examiner’s  FOV Decision states:  “There is the argument to be made that added night shelter use [to a “Social Services  Organizations” use which only expressly allows “day shelter” use] could reduce the  impacts of a day shelter and thereby make a conditional use permit unnecessary. A  day shelter causes displacement of a homeless population every evening it shuts  down whereas a 24‐hour shelter does not. However, it is too implausible to conclude  that’s why the social services organization expressly authorizes just day shelters and  doesn’t mention night shelters. If the Council considered a night shelter a more  benign use than a day shelter, it would have expressly authorized it as a permitted  use elsewhere in the use table.”  Cite:  Hearing Examiner’s August 31, 2020 decision, page 11, lines 11‐18 (emphasis  added); and  WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision’s projections that an unclassified use  interpretation would result in a “Hotel” and/or “Social Service Organizations” land use caused, in  part, the Hearing Examiner to conclude that the COVID‐19 Shelter was not most similar to a  “Diversion Facility / Diversion Interim Service Facility” land use; and  WHEREAS, on or about October 15, 2020, King County, DESC, and RHI jointly applied for  an unclassified use interpretation for the COVID‐19 Shelter, as provided for in the Hearing  Examiner’s FOV Decision (the “Unclassified Use Request”); and  WHEREAS, an unclassified use interpretation application is not a permit application type  that vests upon submittal of a complete application (See RMC 4‐1‐045 “Vesting”); and  WHEREAS, on or about October 23, 2020, King County, DESC, and RHI jointly commenced  a lawsuit in King County Superior Court, under Cause No. 20‐2‐15681‐7 KNT, challenging the  Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision (hereinafter, the “Renton Shelter Lawsuit”); and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation of all parties to the Renton Shelter Lawsuit, the  Renton Shelter Lawsuit’s case schedule was extended by 90 days with the first deadline in the  action now postponed until January 28, 2021; and    WHEREAS, impacts from the COVID‐19 Shelter at the Red Lion Site have created concerns  and identified impacts from neighboring property owners, business owners, residents, tenants,  and visitors regarding the compatibility between the COVID‐19 Shelter and land uses within its  vicinity; and  WHEREAS, this incompatibility became immediately apparent upon the COVID‐19  Shelter’s opening when its operators enclosed the building in security fencing as a measure it  asserted was necessary due to the behavior of its residents and covered the Red Lion hotel’s  signs, making a hotel building located at a primary entrance to the City’s core to appear to be a  vacant and/or cordoned off building; and  WHEREAS, activities of COVID‐19 Shelter residents and the operation and oversight of the  COVID‐19 Shelter have created and continue to create significant public safety and welfare  concerns for the occupants of the COVID‐19 Shelter and surrounding residents, businesses, and  visitors. These public safety and welfare concerns include, but are not limited to dramatically  increased criminal activity, violations of building and fire codes, dramatically increased 9‐1‐1 calls  for emergency services, and threats to the safety of first responders who respond to 9‐1‐1 calls;  and   WHEREAS, the conduct of residents at the COVID‐19 Shelter has led to the Renton  Regional Fire Authority to request police safety escorts to all calls for service that it responds to,  something that does not occur with typical hotel patrons; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9  WHEREAS, the COVID‐19 Shelter residents are at a high risk for interpersonal conflicts  and many have histories of violence, rule violations, and/or illegal substance use that cause other  shelters to deny them services; and    WHEREAS, the COVID‐19 Shelter operators assert that the incidence of such conflicts  have reduced as a result of deintensifying the distance from which the residents live and interact  with each other. Nevertheless, the number of interpersonal conflicts that include threats and  acts of violence (including arson) remains continually high; and    WHEREAS, repeated incidents of arson and threats of arson have highlighted the  significant risks posed by COVID‐19 Shelter residents’ repeated fire code violations; and   WHEREAS, risks of interpersonal conflicts and the related risks posed to COVID‐19 Shelter  residents and first responders are likely to be reduced by further reducing the number of  residents who are prone to interpersonal conflicts living within the same vicinity; and  WHEREAS, reducing the density of the COVID‐19 Shelter’s occupancy and number of  residents who have contributed to dramatically increased levels of criminal and other unsafe  activity and consistently reacted confrontationally to first responders is likely to improve the  safety of shelter residents, staff, visitors, first responders, and those working, living, and visiting  the surrounding vicinity; and  WHEREAS, in response to the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision, the City Council wishes  to legislatively clarify and confirm its policy and interpretation regarding “Hotel,” “Social Service  Organizations,” and “Division Facility / Diversion Interim Service Facility” land uses, to apply city‐ wide; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the amended and clarified definition of “Hotel,” as  set forth in Section IX below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent, including adding the WAC  458‐20‐166(3) definition of “transient” to the definition of “Hotel” to mean “for less than one  month, or less than thirty continuous days if the rental period does not begin on the first day of  the month;” and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that adding a definition for “Hotel, Extended  Stay,” as set forth in Section IX below, further clarifies and codifies the intent of the City Council;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the amended definition of “Social Services  Organizations,” as set forth in Section X below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent, including  confirming that “night shelter” operations are not an allowed component of a Social Service  Organizations land use; and  WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the amended definition of “Diversion  Facility” and the removal of the definition of “Diversion Interim Service Facility,” as set forth in  Section VIII below, clarifies and codifies City Council intent; and  WHEREAS, the City Council also finds that there is a need to adopt certain related  clarifications to the Renton Municipal Code regarding the unclassified use interpretation process,  the distinctions between “principal” and “accessory” uses, and the title of positions within CED;  and  WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that pursuant to the Hearing Examiner’s FOV  Decision, the Renton Municipal Code does not currently allow the COVID‐19 Shelter to operate  within the City’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning district; and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  11  WHEREAS, therefore, in addition to clarifying the Renton Municipal Code in response to  the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision, the City Council has legislatively determined that it will  amend the Renton Municipal Code to add a definition for a “COVID‐19 deintensification shelter”  land use and to allow a single such land use within the City without need for a conditional use  permit, on a short‐term basis coextensive with the effective period of this ordinance and subject  to additional standards and regulations established in this ordinance; and  WHEREAS, City staff has concluded that there are available properties in the City of  Renton in the following zoning designations upon which a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter  could be located after the completion of tenant improvements to the shelter operator’s  satisfaction:  Light Industrial (IL), Medium Industrial (IM), Heavy Industrial (IH), Center Village  (CV), and Commercial Office (CO); and  WHEREAS, City staff has not been advised and is unaware that King County, DESC, or RHI  has inquired into or otherwise determined whether a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter could  be located on any properties in the Light Industrial, Medium Industrial, Heavy Industrial, Center  Village, or Commercial Office zones, either with or without tenant improvements, and the  identification and acquisition of one or more such properties could allow the COVID‐19  deintensification shelter to relocate and operate lawfully in an appropriate zone with appropriate  conditions and thus resolve the issues in the pending Renton Shelter Lawsuit and issues over use  of the Red Lion Site as a COVID‐19 deintensification shelter; and  WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to further consider the issue of whether COVID‐19  deintensification shelters may operate within the City of Renton after the effective period of this  ordinance, and it is the City Council’s desire to have City staff further investigate the matter; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  12  WHEREAS, meanwhile, the City Council recognizes that the homelessness crisis in King  County is a serious regional challenge but that it is a regional challenge that predates the COVID‐ 19 pandemic; and  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that one of the ways that the City can help combat the  homelessness crisis that predated the COVID‐19 pandemic is to expressly allow for homeless  services land uses within the City and to provide for reasonable regulation of such uses; and   WHEREAS, in response, the City Council has determined to, on an emergency and interim  basis, define “homeless services use” land uses, state the zoning designations in which such land  uses are allowed, and establish regulations to be applied to such uses.  During the interim period  in which this ordinance is in effect, it is the City Council’s desire to have City staff further study  options for regulating homeless services uses; and  WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a need to adopt this ordinance as an interim  zoning control ordinance on an emergency basis; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to WAC 197‐11‐880, the adoption of this interim zoning ordinance is  exempt from the requirements of a threshold determination under the State Environmental  Policy Act (SEPA), and future permanent zoning regulations shall be reviewed in accordance with  SEPA requirements; and  WHEREAS, the City Council expressly intends that this ordinance be a legislative policy  action which is not a site‐specific or quasi‐judicial action, and the City Council further recognizes  and intends that such legislative action has the effect of mooting the Unclassified Use Request  by King County, RHI, and DESC and mooting the Renton Shelter Lawsuit by creating an allowed  use for the COVID‐19 Shelter that moots the Hearing Examiner’s FOV Decision; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  13  WHEREAS, the City Council expressly intends that procedural and substantive due process  rights be met in the substance and contents of and process of adopting this ordinance; and  WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on November 23, 2020, regarding the  subject matter of this ordinance, and heard oral testimony on the matter and considered written  comments received prior to the public hearing; and  WHEREAS, the City Council encouraged further public input on the subject matter of this  ordinance by keeping the public hearing open until December 1, 2020 at 5:00 PM for the purpose  of receiving additional written comment; and  WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered numerous written comments  submitted by members of the public; and  WHEREAS, in response to public comment, the City Council wishes to clarify that, as  described in the written presentation materials included in the City Council’s November 23, 2020  agenda packet, the City’s intention regarding the timing of this ordinance has been as follows:     November 23, 2020:  Public hearing;   December 7, 2020:  First reading of the ordinance with revisions that incorporate  feedback from public comments; and   December 14, 2020:  Second reading of the ordinance, City Council action on the  ordinance, and effective date of the ordinance;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. The above recitals are adopted as findings of fact in support of this interim  zoning control ordinance adopted herein pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  14  interpretative and applicable judicial decisions, and are found to be true and correct in all  respects.  SECTION II. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐2‐050.A, 4‐2‐050.C.4, 4‐2‐050.C.5, and 4‐2‐050.C.6 of the  Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐050 remain in  effect and unchanged.  4‐2‐050 PERMITTED LAND USES ESTABLISHED:  A. CATEGORIES OF USES ESTABLISHED:  This Section establishes permitted, conditional, accessory and prohibited uses,  by zone, for all properties within the Renton City Limits. All uses in a given zone  are one of six (6) types:  PERMITTED USES: Land uses allowed outright within a zone as a principal use.  Permitted uses are distinct from other uses listed separately in RMC 4‐2‐060,  Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations and/or as defined.   CONDITIONAL USES (ADMINISTRATIVE): Land uses which may be permitted  as a principal use within a zoning district following review by the Development  Services Division Director Administrator to establish conditions mitigating impacts  of the use and to assure compatibility with other uses in the district.  CONDITIONAL USES (HEARING EXAMINER): Land uUses with special  characteristics that may not generally be appropriate within a zoning district, but  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  15  may be permitted as a principal use subject to review by the Hearing Examiner to  establish conditions to protect public health, safety and welfare.  ACCESSORY USES: Uses customarily incidental and subordinate to the a  principal use and located within the same structure as the principal use or  otherwise upon the same lot site occupied by the a principal use or on an  abutting/adjacent lot that is under the same ownership as the principal lot. Some  accessory uses are specifically listed, particularly where a use is only allowed in an  accessory form, whereas other accessory uses are determined by the  Development Services Division Administrator on a case‐by‐case basis per RMC 4‐ 2‐050C4 and C6, Accessory Use Interpretations and Unclassified Uses.  PROHIBITED USES: Any use which is not specifically enumerated or  interpreted by the City as allowable in that district. Any use not specifically listed  as a permitted, conditional, or accessory use is prohibited, except those uses  determined to be unclassified and permitted by the Development Services  Division Director  Administrator pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐0404‐2‐050C6. Any  prohibited use is illegal and is a misdemeanor punishable under RMC 1‐3‐1,  Penalties.  UNCLASSIFIED USE: A use which does not appear in a list of permitted,  conditionally permitted, or accessory uses, but which is interpreted by the  Development Services Division Director Administrator as similar to a listed  permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory use, and not otherwise  prohibited, pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐050C6, Unclassified Uses.   AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  16  B. ZONING USE TABLES ESTABLISHED:  The following tables establish whether a specific use is permitted in a zoning  district and whether the use is allowed as “permitted,” “conditional,” or  “accessory” use. The zone is located on the horizontal row and the specific use is  located on the vertical column of these tables.  C. INTERPRETATION OF ZONING USE TABLES:  1. Legend: The following letters have the following meanings when they  appear in the box at the intersection of the column and the row:  P Permitted Use  AD Conditional Use – Administrative  H Conditional Use – Hearing  Examiner  AC Accessory Use  2. Other Requirements Applicable: The above uses are subject to the  review procedures specified in chapter 4‐9 RMC, Permits – Specific, the  development standards of chapters 4‐3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay  Districts, 4‐4, City‐Wide Property Development Standards, and 4‐6, Street and  Utility Standards, and may be subject to additional conditions as noted in  subsection C3 of this Section. The Aquifer Protection Regulations of RMC 4‐3‐050,  Critical Areas Regulations, further restrict usage of those properties located within  the Aquifer Protection Area Boundary shown in RMC 4‐3‐050Q, Maps.  3. Additional Use‐Related Conditions: If a number also appears at the  intersection of the column and the row, the use is also subject to the additional  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  17  requirements as listed immediately following the use table in RMC 4‐2‐080,  Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables. All applicable requirements shall  govern a use whether specifically identified in this Chapter or not.  4. Accessory Use Interpretations: The Development Services Division  Director Administrator mayshall determine if an unclassified use or a classified  use, even if not specifically listed as accessory (AC), is permitted as an accessory  use in a zone. Upon inquiry written application by an applicant, an administrative  interpretation shall be made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator to determine if a proposed use is allowed as an accessory use  utilizing the rules of interpretation in subsection C4a of this Section. If the  applicant does not concur with the interpretation of whether a use is accessory or  with the permit type applied to a use, appeal may be made pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐ 110, Appeals. Interpretations made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall be documented, and updates to Title 4, when consistent with  the title format and level of detail, shall incorporate “accessory use”  interpretations upon approval by the legislative authority.  a. Rules of Interpretation for Accessory Uses: To determine whether  a use is permitted as accessory, the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall utilize the following rules of interpretation:  i. If a use is allowed or conditionally allowed in a zone as a  “permitted” use, accessory uses associated with the primary use that are  determined to be incidental, necessary and commonly found with the permitted  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  18  use may be allowed with the same permit type as the primary use, unless  specifically stated otherwise.  ii. If a use is permitted or conditionally permitted as a primary use,  subject to location restrictions, the listed use, even as an accessory use, is also  subject to the same location restrictions as the primary use, unless specifically  stated otherwise. For example, if a use is restricted to a location within the  Employment Area (EA) land use designation, then the accessory form of the use is  only permitted in the EA, unless specifically stated otherwise.  iii. Required parking, required site utilities/facilities, and other  development standards required in order to establish or operate a use on a site  according to the RMC are considered accessory.  5. Prohibited Uses: If no symbol appears in the box at the intersection of  the column and the row, the use is prohibited in that district unless otherwise  determined by the Development Services Division Director Administrator,  pursuant to this subsection C6 of this Section, Unclassified Uses, or subsection C4,  Accessory Use Interpretations.  6. Unclassified Uses: Upon inquirywritten application by an applicant, an  administrative interpretation shall be made by the Development Services Division  Director Administrator to determine if a proposed use, not specifically listed, is  allowed utilizing the criteria in subsection C6a of this Section. Should  interpretation be made that a proposed, unlisted use not be allowed in a specific  zoning district, the Director Administrator shall indicate which zones, if any, do  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  19  permit the use subject to locational restrictions and development standards. If the  Development Services Division Director’s Administrator’s interpretation indicates  that an unlisted use is not consistent with the permitted, conditional or accessory  uses in any district, or if a party does not concur with the permit type applied to a  use, appeal may be made to the City’s Hearing Examiner pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐ 110, Appeals. Interpretations made by the Development Services Division Director  Administrator shall be documented, and updates to Title 4 shall be updated , when  consistent with the title format and level of detail, shallto incorporate respond to  “unclassified use” interpretations upon approval by the legislative authoritymade  by the Administrator.  a. Criteria for Unclassified Uses: In order to make a determination that  an unclassified use is permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory, the  Development Services Division Director Administrator must find that the use is:  i. In keeping with the purpose and intent of the zone, and  consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and other adopted plans  as may be applicable; and  ii. Similar in nature to, and no more intense than, a specifically  listed permitted, conditional or accessory use; and  iii. Consistent with subsection C4 of this Section, if determined to  be permissible as an accessory use.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  20  7. Use Table Conflicts: In the event of a conflict between RMC 4‐2‐060, the  Master Zoning Use Table and any other individual zoning use tables, RMC 4‐2‐ 070A through 4‐2‐070S, the provisions of RMC 4‐2‐060 shall have priority.  8. Existing Legal Nonconforming Uses: Where the term “existing” follows  a listed use type within the table(s) (e.g., horticulture nurseries, existing), then  those who can document that their nonconforming uses were legal at the time  the nonconforming uses were established will be permitted to continue those  nonconforming uses and given all the rights of other permitted uses within the  district. In addition, these uses may be rebuilt “as is, where is” should they suffer  damage. These uses may be remodeled without limitation on value and may be  enlarged subject to current code requirements (e.g., height limits, lot coverage,  density limits, setbacks, parking, etc.), unless otherwise specifically conditioned in  RMC 4‐2‐080.  SECTION IV. Subsection 4‐2‐060.G of the Renton Municipal Code is amended by  modifying one row and adding two rows, and 4‐2‐060.K of the Renton Municipal Code is  amended by adding one row, all as shown in Attachment A. All other provisions in 4‐2‐060 remain  in effect and unchanged.  SECTION V. Subsections 4‐2‐080.A.71 and 4‐2‐080.A.101 of the Renton Municipal Code  are amended as shown below.  All other provisions in 4‐2‐080.A remain in effect and unchanged.  71.    Specified use(s) are only allowed south of I‐405. Diversion facilities  shall be limited to serving no more than one hundred (100) individuals at any time.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  21  101. Reserved.As many as one (1) COVID‐19 deintensification shelter  may operate within the City of Renton without obtaining a conditional use permit  to operate as a Homeless Services Use.  The following applies to a COVID‐19  deintensification shelter operating pursuant to this exemption from the conditional  use permit requirements that would otherwise apply to a Homeless Services Use:  a. After June 1, 2021, the COVID‐19 deintensification shelter shall not serve  more than one hundred twenty‐five (125) persons at any time; and  b. The COVID‐19 deintensification shelter shall cease operations no later  than January 1, 2022, after which date the COVID‐19 deintensification shelter will  be unlawfully operating if it does not hold a valid conditional use permit for a  Homeless Services Use and is not operating in a location in which Homeless  Services Uses are allowed.   SECTION VI. Chapter 4‐4 RMC of the Renton Municipal Code is amended to add Section  4‐4‐045, Homeless Services Use, to read as shown below.  4‐4‐045 HOMELESS SERVICES USE:  A. PURPOSE:  The purpose of this Section is to provide zoning and land use regulations for  homeless services uses that are proposed to or that do primarily provide shelter  to one or more populations of people experiencing or transitioning from  homelessness.  B. APPLICABILITY:  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  22  This Section applies to all homeless services uses, except as expressly set forth  in this Section. This Section does not apply to:  1. Uses allowed under a Temporary Use Permit issued pursuant to the  terms of RMC 4‐9‐240, Temporary Use Permits; and uses temporarily allowed  pursuant to RMC 4‐2‐060.G and 4‐2‐080.A.101 (including a COVID‐19  deintensification shelter);  2. Religious organizations hosting the homeless within buildings on their  property under the terms of RCW 35A.21.360 (Hosting the homeless by religious  organizations – When authorized  – Requirements – Prohibitions on local actions);   3. Social service organizations; and  4. Unrelated individuals living together as a “family” pursuant to the  definition contained in RMC 4‐11‐060.  C. DEFINITIONS:  1. Definitions Applicable to Terminology Used in This Section:  See also  Definitions in RMC chapter 4‐11.  a. “Code of conduct” is an agreement on rules of behavior between  occupants of a homeless services use and operators and providers offering a  homeless services use at a specific location. The code of conduct is intended to  protect the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants and employees of the  homeless services use, and the surrounding residents and businesses.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  23  b. “Funder” means any person, partnership, corporation, or other  organization of any kind that provides funding to establish, construct, or operate  a homeless services use.  c. “Good neighbor agreement (GNA).”  Reserved.  d. “Homeless services use.”   See definition in RMC 4‐11‐080.  e. “Homelessness” refers to the state of a person or group of persons  who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, meaning: (i) Has a  primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not meant for human  habitation; (ii) Is living in a publicly or privately operated shelter designated to  provide temporary living arrangements (including congregate shelters,  transitional housing, and hotels and motels paid for by charitable organizations or  by federal, state, and local government programs); or (iii) Is exiting an institution  where (s)he/it has resided for ninety (90) days or less and who resided in an  emergency shelter or place not meant for human habitation immediately before  entering that institution.  f. “Operator” means any person, partnership, business, corporation,  or other organization of any kind that proposes to site and operate or does  operate a homeless services use in the City.  g. “Provider” means any person, partnership, business, corporation,  or other organization of any kind that provides supportive services to a homeless  population accessing a homeless services use.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  24  h. “Safety and security plan” refers to a plan developed by the  operator and updated to reflect input provided by the Renton Police Department  to address security concerns regarding a homeless services use that is proposed  at a specific location.  i. “Standard operating procedures” refer to a plan developed by the  operator that addresses the elements required by subsection F.2.e of this Section.  The elements contained in the standard operating procedures plan would  generally be applicable to all homeless services uses in Renton irrespective of  where they are proposed to be located.  j. “Supportive services” are those provided to occupants of a homeless  services use for the purpose of facilitating their independence and include, but are  not limited to, services such as case management, food or meals, medical  treatment, psychological counseling, childcare, transportation, and job training.  D. APPROVAL PROCESS REQUIRED:  A homeless services use requires a  conditional use permit, approved by a Hearing Examiner and processed pursuant  to the provisions of RMC 4‐9‐030 and the provisions of this Section.    E. PRE‐APPLICATION PROCESS:  1. Pre‐application Materials: Shall be submitted to the Department  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐100 before a permit application for a homeless services use  may be filed. In addition to standard pre‐application submittal (see RMC 4‐8‐ 100.A), materials for homeless services uses pre‐applications shall include:  a. Name of the operator;  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  25  b. Statement of experience operating the type of homeless services  use that is proposed or any other relevant experience;   c. Statement of homeless population to be served and occupancy  target for each homeless services use proposed;   d. Data provided by the applicant describing the extent to which the  proposed homeless population requires shelter and/or supportive services;  e. Whether the applicant intends to seek funding for the proposed  homeless services use from the City or from a regional coalition for housing;  f. Demonstrated experience of the operator at running successful  homeless services for the homeless population that is intended to be served;  g. The draft safety and security plan that has undergone preliminary  review and incorporated feedback from the Renton Police Department; and  h. Any additional documentation submitted by the applicant for the  pre‐application meeting and written public comments received on the proposal  through completion of the pre‐application neighborhood meeting required by  subsection E.2 of this Section.  2. Pre‐application Neighborhood Meeting: Prior to submittal of pre‐ application materials, the applicant shall hold a public informational meeting  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A, Neighborhood Meetings. The purpose of this meeting  is to provide an early, open dialogue between the applicant, the operator, and  property owners surrounding the proposed homeless services use. The meeting  should acquaint the surrounding property owners with the operator and provide  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  26  for an exchange of information about the proposal and the community where the  use is proposed to be located. The operator shall share information regarding its  intended permit application (e.g., the draft standard operating procedures, draft  code of conduct, and draft safety and security plan) for the proposed homeless  services use. The surrounding property owners should share characteristics of the  surrounding community and any issues or concerns of which the operator should  be made aware. Notice of the neighborhood meeting shall be provided by the  Administrator pursuant to the requirements of RMC 4‐8‐090.A, Neighborhood  Meetings.  3. Pre‐application Site Inspection by the City: If the applicant proposes to  use an existing structure to house a homeless services use, a pre‐application site  inspection by City staff shall be required. The applicant shall allow for an  inspection of the structure proposed to house a homeless services use by staff  representatives of the Community Services Department, the Department’s  Planning Division, the Building Official, the Police Department, and the Fire  Marshal. The purpose of the inspection is to preliminarily determine if the facility  meets the Building and Fire Code standards for the proposed use. The purpose of  this inspection is not to ensure that a facility meets the requirements of this Code  or to force an applicant to bring a proposed facility up to applicable standards  prior to project approval. The inspection is intended to inform the applicant, the  operator, the City, the underlying property owner, and the public of applicable  building modifications that would be necessary to establish a homeless services  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  27  use prior to making an application.  Code deficiencies that are not discovered or  recognized during this inspection shall not excuse the applicant from later  compliance with all applicable City, County, State, and Federal law requirements.     F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:  1. An applicant seeking to establish a homeless services use is required to  submit application materials that meet the submittal requirements for a  conditional use permit as required by RMC 4‐8‐120.  2. In addition to the applicable conditional use permit submittal  requirements identified in subsection F.1 of this Section, information identified in  this subsection shall also be included with the permit application. An application  that does not contain the information listed in this subsection shall not be  considered complete. All applications for homeless services use shall include the  following:  a. A description of the homeless population to be served by the  proposed homeless services use, dates and times of operation, and associated  occupancy targets.  b. A statement of the operator’s experience at providing homeless  services, including examples of similar facilities managed by the operator.  c. A list of transit stops and park and rides within one‐half (0.5) mile of  the proposed homeless services use.  d. A list of job retraining and education uses within one‐half mile (0.5)  of the proposed homeless services use.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  28  e. A standard operating procedures plan including, but not limited to:  i. A description of how the proposed homeless services use will  serve the homeless population that will be accommodated by the use;  ii. A description of staffing for the proposed homeless services use  based on anticipated population size and needs and the training provided to staff  hired to fulfill the identified staffing demand;  iii. A description of the anticipated providers that will serve the  population that will be accommodated by the homeless services use;  iv. A description of the known funders for the homeless services  use;  v. A description of the procedures used to manage intake of the  homeless population that is proposed to be served;  vi. A plan for encouraging prospective occupants to provide  personal identification for inclusion in the Homeless Management Information  System (HMIS) to help increase opportunities to provide access to housing and  services and to secure public funding for the proposed homeless services use;  vii. Where appropriate and feasible, a plan for developing a  community service model that is tailored to the homeless population to be served  at the location where the homeless services use is proposed to be located. A  community service model is intended to provide a framework for persons  experiencing homelessness to work volunteer service hours within the scope of  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  29  their ability in the community where they are receiving support from a homeless  services use;  viii. Where applicable, a plan to ensure that school‐aged residents  of the use are enrolled in school during their stay;  ix. Identification of a primary point of operator contact for  assistance and referrals to send homeless individuals seeking services;  x. A plan for managing exterior appearance of the proposed  homeless services use, including trash/litter, hazardous materials, and biohazards  on the property of the use and surrounding sidewalks;  xi. A description of how the operator will inform and educate  occupants of the homeless services use regarding the code of conduct; and  xii. A description of consequences to be imposed for violating the  code of conduct.  f. A code of conduct that applies within the homeless services use site  to all individuals granted access to the proposed homeless services use including,  but not limited to:  i. Respect the rights of property owners to restrict access to areas  of their property that are not open to the public;  ii. Maintain the site in a safe and habitable condition;  iii.  Do not possess or use illegal substances;  iv. Respect state law restrictions on smoking and use designated  smoking areas where provided; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  30  v. Comply with City of Renton regulations governing public  conduct (including but not limited to the prohibition on public camping, loitering,  trespassing,  littering, creating a nuisance, etc.).  g. A safety and security plan describing measures that the operator  will employ to promote the safety of shelter occupants and surrounding residents  and businesses, including but not limited to:  i. Criteria for rejection or removal of an individual seeking access  to the proposed homeless services use;  ii. A plan for deployment (including time, place and manner) of  security patrols;  iii. A plan to address disruptive behavior exhibited by clients of the  homeless services use provider within a homeless services use and its site that  infringes on the safety of occupants or employees of the use, and a description of  the consequences for engaging in disruptive behavior;  iv. A plan for preventing loitering, creating a nuisance, and  unpermitted camping associated with the homeless services use;  v. Implementation of registered sex offender background checks  and compliance with applicable registration and notification requirements;  vi. A plan for managing individuals excluded from accessing the  proposed homeless services use;  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  31  vii. A plan for coordination between the operator, public safety  officers (e.g., police, fire, etc.), and any private security forces employed by  surrounding property and business owners to ensure timely information sharing;  viii. Provision of a phone number, email address, and point of  contact at the site of the proposed homeless services use for the community to  report concerns;  ix. A plan for addressing reported concerns and documenting  resolution, and sharing this information with relevant neighbors, as applicable to  the concern; and  x. Identification of performance metrics that will be used to track  compliance with the safety and security plan.  h. Neighborhood meeting materials, for both the Pre‐application  Neighborhood Meeting and the Neighborhood Meeting, as required by RMC 4‐8‐ 120.   G. GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENT PROCESS REQUIRED:   Reserved.  H. CITY APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMELESS SERVICES USES:  1. Applicability of City Review Process: A homeless services use requires  approval of a conditional use permit by a Hearing Examiner.  The conditional use  permit shall be reviewed pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐030 as enhanced by the provisions  of this Section.  2. Decision Criteria Applicable to Conditional Use Permits for a Homeless  Services Use: The City may deny, approve, or approve with conditions a  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  32  conditional use permit application for a homeless services use if the applicant  demonstrates that:  a. The proposal complies with the conditional use permit decision  criteria of RMC 4‐9‐030.D;  b. The proposal complies with the applicable requirements of the  RMC;  c. The proposal includes a standard operating procedures plan  meeting the requirements of subsection F.2.e of this Section;  d. The proposal includes a code of conduct meeting the requirements  of subsection F.2.f of this Section;  e. The proposal includes a safety and security plan meeting the  requirements of subsection F.2.g of this Section and incorporating the feedback  provided by the Renton Police Department; and  f. The proposal addresses all applicable design guidelines and  development standards of this Section and any applicable land use district overlay  in a manner which fulfills their purpose and intent.  3. Minimum required notice and public engagement procedures for  homeless services uses shall include the following:  a. Notice of the pre‐application neighborhood meeting shall be provided  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A;  b. A neighborhood meeting shall be held pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.A on  all applications to establish a homeless services use. Prior to the neighborhood  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  33  meeting, the operator shall meet and confer with the Renton Police Department  regarding the proposed safety and security plan described in the submittal  materials as required by subsection F.2.g of this Section. At the neighborhood  meeting, a representative of the homeless services use operator shall present in  writing and describe the proposed safety and security plan, and any input or  comments received on the plan from the Renton Police Department.  c. Notice of an application to establish any homeless services use shall be  provided pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090;  4. Administrator’s Recommendation:  a. A written report of the Administrator shall be prepared in response  to the approval criteria and public comment.  b. Notice of Availability of the Administrator’s Recommendation:  Notice of the availability of the Administrator’s recommendation shall be provided  pursuant to RMC 4‐8‐090.  5. Modifications to a Homeless Services Use: Conditions of approval for  a homeless services use apply for the life of the project. Any increase in the  number of beds beyond that applied for by the applicant and included in the City  approval, or changes to the population served by the homeless services use, shall  be considered a major modification and processed as a new application.  I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/USE REQUIREMENTS:  1. General Development Requirements: The applicable general  development requirements of the zone shall be met unless specifically modified  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  34  by the terms of this Section when applied to a homeless services use.  If there is a  conflict between applicable general development requirements of the zone and  the terms of this Section when applied to a homeless services use, the terms of  this Section shall apply.  2. Parking Requirements: In addition to the terms of RMC 4‐4‐080, the  following requirements apply to all homeless services uses:  a. Number of Parking Stalls: Homeless services uses are unspecified  under the terms of RMC 4‐4‐080.F.10.d, and required parking stalls shall be  established by the Administrator and approved by the Hearing Examiner.  b. Overnight Camping is Prohibited: Camping is prohibited in areas  that provide accessory parking for the homeless services use.  3. Occupancy Limits and Size‐Related Development Standards:  a. All homeless services uses shall comply with occupancy limitations  contained in applicable building and fire codes and ordinances adopted by the  City.  b.  In addition to compliance with subsection I.3.a of this Section,  overnight shelter uses shall not provide sleeping accommodations for more than  one hundred (100) residents, and shall comply with the following additional  requirements:  i. The City shall impose a condition on any approved overnight  shelter use limiting the number of beds to those requested by the applicant or one  hundred (100), whichever is less.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  35  ii. Shelters shall locate greater than one‐half (0.5) mile from any  other homeless services use, unless they are co‐located as part of a single  development and do not serve more than a combined one hundred (100)  residents.  iii. Shelters with more than fifty (50) beds should locate within one  (1) mile of a public transit stop.  4. Minimum Requirements:  a. Homeless Services Uses in General:  i. Toilet, bathing, sleeping, laundry, and storage facilities to meet  the demands anticipated by the homeless services use provider.  ii. Access to WiFi for occupants of the homeless services use.  iii. Designated smoking areas located a minimum of twenty‐five   feet (25’) from perimeter property lines with appropriate cigarette disposal  facilities.  iv. Staffing provided during operating hours for each homeless  services use.  v. Designated and dignified privacy areas to meet the needs of the  anticipated homeless population that is proposed to be served (e.g., lactation  rooms, medical/counseling rooms, caseworker consultation spaces, etc.).  vi. A permanent address to meet the needs anticipated by the  homeless services use provider.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  36  viii. A final safety and security plan updated after and comments  have been received on the plan from the Renton Police Department.  b. Day Shelter Use: Access to electrical outlets to meet the demands  anticipated by the homeless population that is proposed to be served.  c. Overnight Shelter Use:  i. Overnight sleeping accommodations that do not exceed one  hundred (100) beds.  ii. A dedicated electrical outlet for every occupant of a bed.  J. ADDITIONAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:  1. Crime Deterrence: The design of any homeless services use shall  incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles  and use available technology to deter crime. Examples may include:  a. Visibility of entrance and exit points to and from any structure  housing a homeless services use;  b. Open and well‐lighted pedestrian connections between the  homeless services use, accessory parking, transit services and other supportive  services in the area; and  c. Video surveillance of entrance and exit points to and from any  structure housing a homeless services use.  2. Common Areas: Common areas shall be provided to enhance resident  enjoyment through inclusion of features such as libraries, roof decks, patios, and  gardens.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  37  K. MITIGATION MEASURES:  The City may impose conditions relating to the development, design, use, or  operation of a homeless services use to mitigate environmental, public life, safety,  or welfare, or other identifiable impacts.  L. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW:  The applicant shall pay for independent technical review by a consultant  retained by the City for review of materials submitted by the applicant to  demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this Section.   SECTION VII. The definition of “COVID‐19 Deintensification Shelter” is added in  alphabetical order to Section 4‐11‐030 of the Renton Municipal Code as shown below. All other  definitions in Section 4‐11‐030 remain in effect and unchanged.  COVID‐19 DEINTENSIFICATION SHELTER:  A facility (whether a separate structure,  or situated inside or outside a building or a portion of a building) used for the  relocation of homelessness shelters and encampments for the purposes of de‐ intensifying or reducing density in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID‐19)  pandemic.  A COVID‐19 Deintensification Shelter that meets the definition of a  Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter is both a COVID‐19 Deintensification  Shelter and a Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter.  SECTION VIII. The definition of “Diversion Facility” in Section 4‐11‐040 of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended and the definition of “Diversion Interim Service Facility” in Section 4‐ 11‐040 of the Renton Municipal Code is removed, as shown below.  All other definitions in Section  4‐11‐040 remain in effect and unchanged.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  38  DIVERSION FACILITY: A facility which that provides community crisis services,  whereby  inpatient healthcare for individuals that are self‐admitted or ordered,  diverted, or referred from jails, hospitals, doctors or other similar treatment  facilities or professionals, or by first responders, including law enforcement,  hospital emergency department social workers, and similar professionals. options  due to mental illness or chemical dependency.  Services may include an array of  inpatient healthcare treatment and support services including but not limited to  screening and assessment, psychological counseling, case management, crisis  management, detox services, substance use and trauma‐related treatment  services, behavioral/mental health care, medical isolation, care, or treatment,  counseling, respite services, and various levels of accommodations for sleeping  purposes. Some outpatient healthcare services may be provided. Not included in  this definition are congregate residences, assisted living facilities, adult family  homes, group homes, convalescent centers, social service organizations, or  homeless services uses.   DIVERSION INTERIM SERVICE FACILITY: A facility which provides interim or  respite services, such as temporary shelter, medical/mental health treatment,  case management or other support options such as transportation arrangements  for patients referred to such a facility from a diversion facility.  SECTION IX. The definition of “Hotel” in Section 4‐11‐080 of the Renton Municipal Code  is amended as shown below. The definitions of “Homeless Services Use” and “Hotel, Extended‐ AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  39  Stay” are added in alphabetical order to Section 4‐11‐080 of the Renton Municipal Code as shown  below. All other definitions in Section 4‐11‐080 remain in effect and unchanged.  HOMELESS SERVICES USE:  A day shelter or overnight shelter as defined below:  1. Day Shelter: A facility that offers a haven to people experiencing homelessness  by providing a safe place to rest during the day or evening, but with no overnight  stays. Support services for homeless populations is an integral part of a day shelter  use and includes but is not limited to access to food, seating, showers, laundry,  restrooms, storage, a computer lab, phones, fax, and a critical mailing address.  Spaces for meetings and examinations are generally provided to accommodate  counseling and access to medical/dental and legal assistance.  2. Overnight Shelter: Any facility that is operated for a long‐term and indefinite  period (and not in response to a single sudden event such as a natural disaster)  for the primary purpose of providing shelter for people experiencing  homelessness in general or for specific populations of people experiencing  homelessness. Supportive services may or may not be provided in addition to the  provision of shelter. A COVID‐19 deintensification shelter meeting this definition  is a Homeless Services Use – Overnight Shelter.  HOTEL: A building or portion thereof designed or used wherein a majority of the  net floor area is dedicated for the rental of rooms for transient occupancy rental  for sleeping purposes in exchange for payment, and typically based on a per night  and per room basis for no more than thirty (30) continuous days and not meeting  the definition of Homeless Services Use. For the purposes of this definition,  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  40  “transient” means less than one (1) month, or less than thirty (30) continuous days  if the rental period does not begin on the first day of the month.  Hotel structures  are at least two (2) stories in height, with lodging space generally above the first  floor. Lodging space may also be located on the first floor. Individual rooms are  typically accessed from a common hallway and include permanent provisions for  sanitation but do not provide kitchen facilities. A central commercial kitchen and  dining room catering to the hotel patrons may be provided, event space, eating  and drinking establishments, and accessory shops and services typically located in  or provided by hotels and catering to the general public may be provided. Not  included in this definition are facilities providing crisis intervention or case  management or both, multi‐family attached dwellings, bed and breakfasts, or  motels.   HOTEL, EXTENDED‐STAY: A building or portion thereof for rental of rooms with  permanent provisions for living, eating, sanitation, and cooking for temporary  occupancy without limits on duration. Extended‐stay hotel structures are at least  two (2) stories in height, with lodging space generally above the first floor, and not  meeting the definition of a Homeless Services Use. Lodging space may also be  located on the first floor. Individual rooms accessed from a common hallway. A  commercial kitchen and dining room catering to the extended‐stay patrons may  be provided; event space, eating and drinking establishments, and accessory  shops and services typically located in or provided by hotels or extended‐stay  hotels and catering to the general public may be provided. Not included in this  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  41  definition are facilities providing crisis intervention or case management or both,  attached dwellings, bed and breakfasts, hotels, or motels.  SECTION X. The definition of “Social Service Organizations” in Section 4‐11‐190 of the  Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other definitions in Section 4‐11‐190  remain in effect and unchanged.  SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS: Public or nonprofit agencies that provide  counseling, therapy, job training, educational classes, food banks, clothing banks,  or other social or human services to persons needing such services due to physical,  mental, emotional, or other disabilities, but do not provide crisis intervention, day  or night shelter, or case management. Also, public or nonprofit agencies that  provide public services such as food banks, clothing banks, day shelters, and job  training centers. This does not include religious institutions, offices, government  facilities, schools, hospitals, clinics, day care, homeless services uses, medical  institutions, diversion facilities, lodging in any form, or residential uses.  SECTION XI. The interim zoning controls imposed herein shall be in effect for six (6)  months from the passage of this ordinance, unless ended earlier by subsequent City Council  action, or unless subsequently extended by the City Council pursuant to state law.  SECTION XII.  During the interim period in which these interim zoning controls are in  effect, City staff are directed to further investigate:   (1)  The matter of COVID‐19 deintensification shelters and what further zoning and land  use regulation, if any, of such uses the City should undertake; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  42  (2) The matter of homeless services uses and what further zoning and land use regulation,  if any, of such uses the City should undertake.      City staff should present to the City Council for its consideration an update regarding  these two matters prior to the expiration of the interim zoning controls established in this  ordinance, as well as any further recommended legislation.    SECTION XIII. If any Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION XIV. The City Council declares an emergency for the protection of the public  welfare and to enable the purpose and intent of this ordinance to be accomplished. This  ordinance shall take effect immediately when passed by the City Council. The City Clerk shall  cause to be published a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary  shall consist of this ordinance’s title..      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________  43  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2120:12/3/2020 AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 44 ATTACHMENT A USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC G. OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Diversion facility and diversion interim service facility                     H71 H71               Homeless services use          H H H  H   H   COVID‐19 deintensification shelter          P101 P101 P101  P101 P101  P101   K. SERVICES Hotel, extended‐stay          P29 P29 P29     P29 P   AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SELF‐ STORAGE STANDARDS IN SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐060.M, 4‐2‐080.A.17, 4‐2‐080.A.22,  AND 4‐2‐080.A.59 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State  of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. Subsection 4‐2‐060.M of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown  on Attachment A. All other provisions in 4‐2‐060 remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐2‐080.A.17, 4‐2‐080.A.22, and 4‐2‐080.A.59 of the Renton  Municipal Code are amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐080.A remain in effect  and unchanged.  17.   Reserved. Self‐service storage shall be prohibited on corner properties  or within the City Center Community Planning Area. For the purposes of this  AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  condition, corner properties are defined as all private properties within one  hundred feet (100’) of a public roadway intersection as measured along property  lines. Additionally, self‐service storage facilities shall be subject to the following:  a. Self‐service storage facilities shall be located within a multistory  structure, limited to fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the building, and  prohibited on the ground floor along any street frontage.   b. At a minimum, leasable commercial space, entrances/lobbies, or  management offices for the self‐service storage shall be provided on the ground  floor at a depth of thirty feet (30') along any street frontage. Averaging the  minimum depth may be permitted through the site plan review process, provided  no portion of the depth is reduced to less than twenty feet (20').   c. All commercial space on the ground floor shall have a minimum  floor‐to‐ceiling height of eighteen feet (18'), and a minimum clear height of fifteen  feet (15') unless a lesser clear height is approved by the Administrator.   d. Exterior colors, including any internal corridors or doors visible  through windows, shall be muted tones.  22.    Self‐service storage shall be part of a mixed use development. Retail  sales uses in the CN Zone are limited to: flowers/plants and floral supplies; mini‐ marts; crafts, including supplies and finished products; gift shops; specialty  markets; and other similar small scale, low‐intensity commercial uses that serve  nearby residents, as determined by the Community and Economic Development  Administrator.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  59.    The specified uses shall be prohibited within the area south of I‐405  and north of SW 16th Street and within the City Center Community Planning Area.  SECTION IV. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION V. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2127:10/7/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 4 ATTACHMENT A 4‐2‐060 Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations: USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC M. STORAGE Bulk storage                   P29 P29 P29        Hazardous material storage, on site or off site, including treatment                   H24 H24 H24               Indoor storage                   P P P AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11   Outdoor storage, existing                   P29 P29 P29     P64         Outdoor storage, new                   P29 P29 P29     P64         Self‐service storage                   AD29 P59 P H22   H17 22         Vehicle storage                     AD29 AD29     AD29         Warehousing                   P P P                AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADDING REGULATIONS FOR STANDALONE SOLAR ENERGY STRUCTURES BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 4- 2-060.O OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING CHAPTER 4-4 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 4-4-105 “SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS,” AND ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS OF “SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM” AND “SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM, GROUND MOUNTED, SMALL SCALE” TO SECTION 4-11- 190 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020, considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-060.O of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown on Attachment A. All other provisions in 4-2-060 remain in effect and unchanged. SECTION III. Chapter 4-4 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended to add a new section 4-4-105 “Solar Energy Systems” to read as shown below. All other provisions in 4-4 remain in effect and unchanged. AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 2 4-4-105 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS: A. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to provide standards for certain Solar Energy Systems to reduce impacts related to visibility while promoting the use of alternative energy sources for users. B. APPLICABILITY: The Section shall apply to: 1. New or Replacement Equipment/Activity: All proposals for new or replacement Solar Energy Systems. 2. Enlargement or Exterior Modifications of Existing Structures: Solar Energy Systems that are not in conformance with this Section shall be required to conform to the requirements of this Section if enlarged or altered when the cost of the alterations exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the value of the existing Solar Energy System. C. AUTHORITY: The Administrator shall determine compliance with these standards concurrently with any development permit review, or in association with any code compliance issue. D. SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM, GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, SMALL-SCALE: 1. Height: No portion of the structure shall exceed the maximum allowed wall-plate height for detached accessory buildings in the subject zone as AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 3 established in RMC 4-2-110B, Development Standards for Residential Development (Detached Accessory Buildings). 2. Setbacks: The structure shall be subject to setback requirements for detached accessory buildings in the subject zone as established in RMC 4-2-110B, Development Standards for Residential Development (Detached Accessory Buildings). 3. Location: The structure shall not be sited closer than six feet (6’) from a residential structure and shall not be located between the primary structure and a street. 4. Impervious Surface/Building Coverage: Structures with grass or an alternative pervious surface under the associated panels are excluded from maximum building coverage or maximum impervious surface area requirements established in RMC 4-2-110A, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary Structures). If pavement or other impervious surfaces are utilized around the base of the structure or under the solar panels, the structure would be not be eligible for the exemption. E. VARIANCES: A variance to standards may be sought pursuant to RMC 4-9-250. SECTION IV. Section 4-11-190 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended to add new definitions in alphabetical order of “Solar Energy System” and “Solar Energy System, Ground Mounted, Small Scale” to read as shown below. All other definitions in 4-11-190 remain in effect and unchanged. AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 4 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM: A device or structural design feature, a substantial purpose of which is to provide for interior lighting or provide for the collection, storage, and distribution of solar energy for space heating or cooling, electricity generation, or water heating. SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM, GROUND MOUNTED, SMALL-SCALE: A Solar Energy System that is structurally mounted to the ground and typically a size that would service a house, small businesses, or small municipal building. SECTION V. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance. SECTION VI. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance’s title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020. Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020. Armondo Pavone, Mayor AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 5 Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:2138:11/20/2020 AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 6 ATTACHMENT A 4-2-060.O USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R-1 R-4 R-6 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC O. Utilities Communication broadcast and relay towers H H H H H H H H H H29 H29 H29 H H H H H H Electrical power generation and cogeneration H H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 Utilities, small P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P P P P P P P P P P Utilities, medium AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD5 AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD Utilities, large H5 H5 H5 H5 H5 H5 H5 H5 H5 H H H H H H H H H H Solar Energy System, Ground Mounted, Small- Scale AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING  REGULATIONS FOR THE CENTER DOWNTOWN (CD) ZONE BY AMENDING  SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐060.L, 4‐2‐080.A.3, 4‐2‐080.A.6, AND 4‐2‐120.B; AND THE  DEFINITION OF “DWELLING, ATTACHED” IN SECTION 4‐11‐040 OF THE RENTON  MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation and  study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State of  Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. Subsection 4‐2‐060.L of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown  in Attachment A. All other provisions in 4‐2‐060 remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐2‐080.A.3 and 4‐2‐080.A.6 of the Renton Municipal Code are  amended as shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐080.A remain in effect and unchanged.  3.    These uses shall not be located on the ground floor of buildings in the  Downtown Business District depicted in RMC 4‐2‐080D, except structured parking  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  facilities, which may be located on the ground floor provided that where adjacent  to public sidewalk structured parking facilities shall be setback a minimum of ten  feet (10’) from the right‐of‐way, unless adequately screened to the satisfaction of  the Administrator.    6.    Specified residential use(s) are not allowed within one thousand feet  (1,000') of the centerline of Renton Municipal Airport runway. Attached dwellings  are not permitted in the CA or CN Zone within the Benson, Cedar River, Talbot, or  Valley Community Planning Areas.      Where not prohibited, attached dwelling units are permitted subject to  the following conditions and standards in addition to RMC 4‐4‐150, Residential  Mixed Use Development Standards:  a.    Standalone Residential – Where Allowed: Standalone residential  buildings are permitted:  i.    In the CD Zone outside of the Downtown Business District,  provided residential amenity space and/or lobby space is provided on the ground  floor along the street frontage, which shall be at least twenty feet (20’) wide and  at least fifty percent (50%) of the façade width for facades less than sixty feet (60’)  wide, or a minimum of thirty feet (30’) wide for facades greater than sixty feet (60’)  wide. (Widths shall be measured along the building façade.) The ground floor shall  have a floor‐to‐ceiling height of twelve feet (12’). Where located on the ground  floor and within ten feet (10’) of public sidewalk, the floors of attached dwellings  shall be at least two feet (2’) elevated above the grade of the sidewalk.   AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  ii.    In the CV Zone where not abutting NE Sunset Blvd. east of  Harrington Avenue NE;  iii.    In the CA Zone where abutting a residential zone if at least one  vertical mixed building is constructed along the street frontage(s) with a minimum  of two (2) residential stories above commercial, the standalone residential  building(s) are sited closest to the abutting residential zone and, if townhouses,  limited to three (3) stories;  iv.    In the UC Zone along streets not designated as pedestrian‐ oriented streets through the Master Site Plan process; and  v.    In the COR Zone as determined through the Master Site Plan  process.      Where standalone residential buildings are not allowed, dwelling  units shall be integrated into a vertically mixed use building with ground floor  commercial.  b.    Commercial Uses: Commercial uses in residential mixed‐use  developments are limited to retail sales, on‐site services, eating and drinking  establishments, taverns, daycares, preschools, indoor recreational facilities, pet  daycares, craft distilleries/small wineries/micro‐breweries with tasting rooms,  general offices not located on the ground floor, and similar uses as determined by  the Administrator.      Uses normal and incidental to a building including, but not limited to,  interior entrance areas, elevators, waiting/lobby areas, mechanical rooms, mail  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  areas, garbage/recycling/compost storage areas, vehicle parking areas, and  areas/facilities for the exclusive use of the residents are not considered commercial  uses.  c.    Timing of Development: A building permit shall not be issued for  any standalone residential building(s) prior to the issuance of a building permit for  any required standalone commercial or vertically mixed use building(s) and no  certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any standalone residential building(s)  prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any required standalone  commercial or vertically mixed use building(s).  SECTION IV. Subsection 4‐2‐120.B of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown  on Attachment B. All other provisions in 4‐2‐120 remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION V. The definition of “Dwelling, Attached” in section 4‐11‐040 of the Renton  Municipal Code is amended as shown below. All other definitions in 4‐11‐040 remain in effect and  unchanged.  DWELLING, ATTACHED: A dwelling unit connected to one or more dwellings by  common roofs, walls, or floors or a dwelling unit or units attached to garages or  other nonresidential uses. This definition includes assisted living facilities but  excludes boarding and lodging houses, accessory dwelling units, adult family  homes, group home I or group home II as defined herein. Attached dwellings  include the following types:  A. Flat: A dwelling unit attached to one or multiple dwelling units by one or more  common roof(s), wall(s), or floor(s) within a building. Typically, the unit’s habitable  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  area is provided on a single level. Unit entrances are may or may not be provided  from a common internal corridor.  B. Townhouse: A ground‐related dwelling attached to one or more such units in  which each unit has its own exterior, ground‐level access to the outside, no unit is  located over another unit, and each unit is separated from any other unit by one  or more vertical common walls. Townhouse units may be multi‐story.  C. Carriage House: One or more dwelling units built above one or more private  garage(s). The attached garage(s) typically contains vehicles and/or storage for  people living in another building as well as occupants of the carriage house. This  definition does not include accessory dwelling unit.  D. Garden Style Apartment(s): A dwelling unit that is one of several stacked  vertically, with exterior stairways and/or exterior corridors and surface parking.  Parking is not structured and may include detached carports or garages. Buildings  and building entries are oriented toward internal drive aisles and/or parking lots  and not street frontage. There is typically no formal building entry area connected  to a public sidewalk and a public street. Site planning may incorporate structures  developed at low landscaped setbacks.  SECTION VI. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2130:11/4/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 7 ATTACHMENT A 4‐2‐060 Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations:  USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC L. VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES Car washes                   P P P AD2   P2         Express transportation services                   AD P       AD20         Fuel dealers                     H59 P               Industrial engine or transmission rebuild                   P28 P28 P28               Parking garage, structured, commercial or public          P P P   P P20 P3 P P P92 Parking, surface, commercial or public, existing                 P29 P29   P29      P20  P3 AD      Parking, surface, commercial or public, new          P29 P29 P29   P20  AD   AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 8 USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC Park and ride, dedicated                   P107 P107 P107   P107 P107 P107 P107   P107 Park and ride, shared‐use     P P P P P P P P P P   P107 P109 P107 P   P107 Railroad yards                       P               Taxi stand                           P   AD AD     Tow truck operation/auto impoundment yard                   P36 H59 P     AD36         Transit centers                   H29 H29 H29   P H20 P H29   P Truck terminals                       P               Vehicle fueling stations                   P P P   P P   P29     Vehicle fueling stations, existing legal                   P P P AD P P   P29     Vehicle service and repair, large                   AD2 P P               Vehicle service and repair, small                   P2 P2 P2 AD2 AD2 AD2         Wrecking yard, auto                     H59 H               Air Transportation Uses Airplane manufacturing                     H59               P78 AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 9 USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC Airplane manufacturing, accessory functions                     AC               P78 Airplane sales and repair                       P               Airport, municipal                     P                 Airport‐related or aviation‐related uses                     AC                 Helipads         P111         H29 H29 H29         H H H78 Helipads, commercial                     H               H78 AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 10 ATTACHMENT B 4‐2‐120B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum Lot Size for lots created after July 11, 19939 None 25,000 sq. ft. None Minimum Lot Width/Depth for lots created after July 11, 1993 None LOT COVERAGE Maximum Lot Coverage for Buildings None 65%19 of total lot area or 75%19 if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage. DENSITY (Dwelling Units per Net Acre) Minimum Net Residential Density9 7525 dwelling units per net acre. The minimum density requirements shall not apply to the subdivision and/or development of a legal lot 1/2 acre or less in size as of March 1, 1995. 75 dwelling units per net acre.22 Where a development involves residential, the minimum density shall be 30 dwelling units per net acre. The same area used for commercial and office development can also be used to calculate residential density. Where commercial and/or office areas are utilized in the calculation of density, the City AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 11 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR may require restrictive covenants to ensure the maximum density is not exceeded should the property be subdivided or in another manner made available for separate lease or conveyance. Maximum Net Residential Density9 150100 dwelling units per net acre. Density may be increased to 200150 dwelling units per net acre subject to conditional use permit approval.1, 21 150 dwelling units per net acre. Density may be increased up to 250 dwelling units per net acre subject to conditional use permit approval.1, 21 50 dwelling units per net acre.1, 21 The same area used for commercial and office development can also be used to calculate residential density. Where commercial and/or office areas are utilized in the calculation of density, the City may require restrictive covenants to ensure the maximum density is not exceeded should the property be subdivided or in another manner made available for separate lease or conveyance. SETBACKS AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 12 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR Minimum Front Yard14,18 None Residential Mixed Use Buildings: 0 ft. Buildings less than 25 ft. in height: 15 ft.19 Buildings 25 ft. to 80 ft. in height: 20 ft.13,19 Buildings over 80 ft. in height: 30 ft.13,19 Determined through site plan review. Maximum Front Yard18 15 ft. – for buildings, or for portions thereof, 25 ft. or less in height. None – for that portion of a building over 25 ft. in height. Residential Mixed Use Buildings: 15 ft. All Other Buildings: None Determined through site plan review. Minimum Secondary Front Yard14,18 None 0 ft.19 for Residential Mixed use Buildings 15 ft.19 – for buildings less than 25 ft. in height. 20 ft.13,19 – for buildings 25 ft. to 80 ft. in height. 30 ft.13,19 – for buildings over 80 ft. in height. Determined through site plan review. Maximum Secondary Front Yard18 15 ft. – for buildings, or portions thereof, 25 ft. or less in height. None – for that portion of a building over 25 ft. in height. Residential Mixed Use Buildings: 15 ft.15 All Other Buildings: None Determined through site plan review. AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 13 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR Minimum Freeway Frontage Setback 10 ft. landscaped setback from the property line. Minimum Rear Yard14,18 None, unless the ground floor façade provides windows for living rooms of attached dwellings – then 10 ft. – unless adjacent to an alley, then none.  Additionally, if the CD lot abuts a lot zoned residential, then there shall be a 15 ft. wide landscaped strip or a 5 ft. wide sight‐obscuring landscaped strip and a solid 6 ft. high barrier used along the common boundary with an additional 5 ft. setback from the barrier. None required, except, 15 ft. if abutting a lot zoned residential. Determined through site plan review. Minimum Side Yard18 None, unless the ground floor façade provides living room windows of attached dwellings – then 10 ft. – unless adjacent to an alley, then none. Additionally, if the CD lot abuts a lot zoned residential, then there shall be a 15 ft. wide landscaped strip or a 5 ft. wide sight‐obscuring landscaped strip and a solid 6 ft. None required, except 15 ft. if abutting or adjacent to a residential zone. Determined through site plan review. AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 14 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR high barrier along the common boundary with an additional 5 ft. setback from the barrier. Clear Vision Area n/a In no case shall a structure over 42 in. in height intrude into the 20 ft. clear vision area defined in RMC 4‐11‐030. LANDSCAPING General See RMC 4‐4‐070 HEIGHT Maximum Building Height 95 ft. Heights may exceed the Zone’s maximum height with a conditional use permit.6 250 ft.6 10 stories and/or 125 ft.6 Maximum Building Height When a Lot Is Abutting a Lot Designated as Residential 20 ft. more than the maximum height allowed in the abutting residential zone. Heights may exceed the maximum height with a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit.6 20 ft. more than the maximum height allowed in the abutting residential zone.6 Determined through site plan review. Maximum Height for Wireless Communication Facilities6, 9 See RMC 4‐4‐140 SCREENING Minimum Required for Outdoor Loading, Repair, See RMC 4‐4‐095 AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 15 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR Maintenance, Storage or Work Areas; Surface‐Mounted Utility and Mechanical Equipment; Roof Top Equipment (Except for Telecommunication Equipment) Refuse or Recycling See RMC 4‐4‐090 PARKING AND LOADING General See RMC 4‐4‐080 and RMC 10‐10‐13 See RMC 4‐4‐080 and RMC 10‐10‐13. Direct arterial access to individual structures shall occur only when alternative access to local or collector streets or consolidated access with adjacent uses is not feasible. Required Location for Parking All parking shall be provided in the rear portion of the site yard, with access taken from an alley, when where available. Surface parking Parking shall not be located between a building and a street. in the front yard, nor in a side yard facing the street nor rear yard facing the street. n/a AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 16 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR Parking may be located off‐site or subject to a joint parking requirement. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS General n/a A pedestrian connection shall be provided from a public entrance to the street, unless the Reviewing Official determines that the requirement would unduly endanger the pedestrian. Determined through site plan review. SIGNS General See RMC 4‐4‐100 LOADING DOCKS Location For permitted manufacturing and fabrication uses, parking, docking and loading areas for truck traffic shall be off‐street and screened from view of abutting public streets. Not permitted on the side of the lot adjacent or abutting to a lot zoned residential.3 Determined through site plan review. DUMPSTER/RECYCLING COLLECTION AREA Size and Location of Refuse or Recycling Areas See RMC 4‐4‐090 AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 17 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR CRITICAL AREAS General See RMC 4‐3‐050 and 4‐3‐090 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Design Regulations See RMC 4‐3‐100, Urban Design Regulations Design District D of RMC 4‐3‐100, Urban Design Regulations, shall apply to all residential mixed use buildings. Urban Design Regulations are not applicable to other buildings. See RMC 4‐3‐100, Urban Design Regulations. Upper Story Setbacks None, unless adjacent to and facing a residentially zoned lot or if the façade contains living rooms windows – then 10 ft. for the second story and 15 ft. for all other upper stories. Also, see See RMC 4‐3‐100, Urban Design Regulations Residential mixed use buildings: buildings or portions of buildings that exceed one hundred feet (100') in height shall include upper story setbacks as follows: The minimum setback for a seventh (7th) story and succeeding stories shall be ten feet (10') minimum from the preceding story, applicable to each story, or an equivalent standard that adds interest and quality to the building. Buildings or portions of buildings that exceed fifty feet (50') in height shall include upper story setbacks as follows: The minimum setback for a fifth story and succeeding stories shall be ten feet (10') minimum from the preceding story, applicable to each story or an equivalent standard that adds interest and quality to the building. AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 18 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS (CD, CO, & COR)     CD CO COR Roofline and Facade Modulation See RMC 4‐3‐100, Urban Design Regulations Residential mixed use buildings: buildings shall provide vertical and horizontal modulation of roof lines and facades of not less than two feet (2') at a minimum interval of forty feet (40') per building face, or an equivalent standard that adds interest and quality to the building. Buildings shall provide vertical and horizontal modulation of roof lines and facades of not less than two feet (2') at a minimum interval of forty feet (40') per building face, or an equivalent standard that adds interest and quality to the building.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. d) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION  4‐1‐045 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY RENAMING THE SECTION FROM  “VESTING” TO “VESTING REGULATIONS,” ELIMINATING SHORELINE  DEVELOPMENT PERMITS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FROM THE LIST OF  APPLICATIONS THAT VEST AT COMPLETE APPLICATION, CLARIFYING DURATION  OF VESTING, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE  DATE.    WHEREAS, with this Ordinance, the City primarily seeks to narrow and clarify the scope  of the City’s vesting laws by eliminating Shoreline Development Permits and Conditional Use  Permits from the list of applications that vest upon complete application; and  WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State  of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. Subsection 4‐1‐045 of the Renton Municipal Code is renamed from  “Vesting” to “Vesting and Duration of Approvals Regulations.”   AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ORDINANCE NO. ________    2  SECTION III. Subsection 4‐1‐045.C.1, of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  shown below. All other provisions in 4‐1‐045.C remain in effect and unchanged.  C. VESTING APPLICABILITY:  1. This Section applies to, and vesting occurs with, the filing of a complete  application and permit approvals required by the City of Renton pursuant to Title  IV, including and limited to of the following:  a. Building permits (including but not limited to combo permits,  grading licenses, and sign permits);  b. Preliminary plats, final plats, short plats; and  c. Shoreline development permits;   d. Conditional use permits; and   ec. Any other land use permit application that is specifically identified  by the Washington State legislature as being covered by the vested rights doctrine.  2. Vesting does not apply to the following:  a. Incomplete, invalid, inaccurate or defective building permit  applications;  b. Fees or taxes, including, but not limited to, impact fees;  c. Pre‐application plans;  d. Any other application or permit not specifically identified in this  subsection C, as it exists or may be amended;  e. Uses not specifically disclosed in the application; or  AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ORDINANCE NO. ________    3  f. Any application or permit that may reasonably result in a threat to  the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. The City’s exercise of police  power to protect the public health and safety, and/or general welfare immediately  extinguishes any “vested right.”  SECTION IV.  Subsection 4‐1‐045.F, of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  follows:  F. DURATION OF APPROVALS VESTING:  1. Building Permits: Development of a building shall be based on the  controls contained in the approved permit application, and permits are subject to.  Vesting rights applicable to building permit applications would expire pursuant to  permit expiration periods identified in the International Building Code (IBC) and  adopted by reference herein in RMC 4‐5‐050, as it exists or may be amended.  2. Preliminary Plat: Development of an approved preliminary plat shall be  based on the controls contained in the Hearing Examiner’s decision. A final plat  meeting all of the requirements of the preliminary plat approval shall be  submitted within the time frame specified in RMC 4‐7‐080L, unless a different  time limitation was specifically authorized in the final approval.   23. Final Plat: The lots in a final plat may be developed by the terms of  approval of the final plat, and the development regulations in effect at the time  the preliminary plat application was deemed complete for a period of five (5) years  from the recording date unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a  serious threat to the public health, safety or welfare.   AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ORDINANCE NO. ________    4  4. Conditional Use Permit: The use authorized in a conditional use permit  shall be allowed to develop for a period of two (2) years from the effective date  of the permit approval unless a different time limitation was specifically  authorized in the final approval. The development of an approved conditional use  permit shall be governed by the terms of approval of the permit unless the City  finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to the public health,  safety or welfare.   53. Permits Associated with a Preliminary Plat: Permit applications, such  as Planned Urban Developments (PUD) applications, that are approved as a  companion to a preliminary plat application, shall remain valid for the duration of  the permit application type or preliminary and final plat as provided in subsections  F2 and 3 of this Section, whichever is longer as they exist or may be amended.  64. Short Plat: The lots in a short plat may be developed by the terms and  conditions of approval, and the development regulations in effect at the time the  application was deemed complete for a period of five (5) years from the recording  date unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to  the public health, safety or welfare.   7. Shoreline Development Permits: An approved Shoreline Permit shall be  allowed to develop pursuant to the time limitations listed in RMC 4‐9‐190J (Time  Requirements for Shoreline Permits), as it exists or may be amended. The  development of an approved shoreline permit shall be governed by the terms of  AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ORDINANCE NO. ________    5  approval of the permit unless the City finds that a change in conditions creates a  serious threat to the public health, safety or welfare.   85. All approvals permits described in this Section shall be vested for the  specific use, density, and physical development identified in the permit approval.   SECTION V.  If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION VI. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ORDINANCE NO. ________    6  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2140:11/4/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVISING ACCESSORY  DWELLING UNIT (ADU) REGULATIONS BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4‐2‐110.C,  4‐2‐110.E, AND 4‐2‐116.B.2 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, the City seeks to reduce barriers to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)  development and streamline the application process with the intent of diversifying and  increasing housing opportunities in Renton; and  WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State  of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;     NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. The Maximum Number and Size and Maximum Wall Plate Height  regulations in subsection 4‐2‐110.C of the Renton Municipal Code are amended as shown below.  All other provisions in 4‐2‐110.C remain in effect and unchanged.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  4‐2‐110C DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT  (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS)  MAXIMUM NUMBER AND SIZE  General17    RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10, and R‐14  1 ADU is permitted per legal lot.  Unit size shall be determined by lot size and the size of the  primary structure; the total gross floor area square footage of the  ADU shall not exceed the size stated in the Maximum Unit Size  section of this table or 75% of the total square footage gross floor  area of the primary structure, whichever is smaller.41   MAXIMUM UNIT SIZE   Lot Area: Maximum ADU Size40, 41  3,000 sq. ft. or less 600 sq. ft.  3,001 ‐ 4,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.  5,000 ‐ 6,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.  7,000 ‐ 8,999 sq. ft.  900 sq. ft.  Greater than 9,000 sq.  ft.  1,000 sq. ft.  MAXIMUM WALL PLATE HEIGHT 18, 19, 41   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14  ADUs are subject to the maximum wall plate height of RMC 4‐2‐ 110A, and associated conditions and, except that the ADU shall  not be taller than the primary structure. Additional ADU height  allowances may be permitted upon application and approval of a  modification pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐250.42   LOCATION  General   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14 ADUs shall be located at least 6 ft. from any residential structure.  MINIMUM SETBACKS 4, 41  Front Yard and Secondary Front Yard   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14  The ADU shall be set back an additional 5 ft. parallel to and  measured from the front facade of the primary structure and  shall comply with the setbacks applied to the primary structure,  AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  as identified in RMC 4‐2‐110A, Development Standards for  Residential Zoning Designations.  ADUs shall not be permitted between the primary structure and  the street unless approved in the Conditional Use Permit process.  Side Yard   RC and R‐1 25 ft.   R4, R‐6 and R‐8 5 ft.   R‐10 and R‐14 4 ft.  Rear Yard   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14  5 ft.  When located within 10 ft. of the rear property line, at least 25%  of the lineal length of the rear yard shall remain unoccupied from  accessory dwellings, except when the rear property line abuts an  alley.  Clear Vision Area   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14  In no case shall a structure over 42 in. in height intrude into the  20 ft. clear vision area defined in RMC 4‐11‐030.  CRITICAL AREAS  General   RC, R‐1, R‐4, R‐6, R‐8,  R‐10 and R‐14  See RMC 4‐3‐050, Critical Areas Regulations, and 4‐3‐090,  Shoreline Master Program Regulations.  SECTION III. Subsections 4‐2‐110.E.40 and 4‐2‐110.E.41 of the Renton Municipal Code  are amended as shown below, and subsection 4‐2‐110.E of the Renton Municipal Code is  amended to add a new subsection 4‐2‐110.E.42 to read as shown below. All other provisions in  4‐2‐110.E remain in effect and unchanged.  40.    For the purpose of calculating maximum unit size only, tThe square  foot calculation shall not include porches or exterior stairs. Garages attached to  accessory dwellings shall be included in the square foot calculation, except for  when the entirety of the living area accessory dwelling is located above a garage.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  41.    Conversion of accessory buildings to ADUs shall be exempted from  the relevant development regulations if the accessory building was constructed  prior to January 1, 2020. However, modifications made to accessory buildings  after January 1, 2020 that would increase the nonconformance of the proposed  conversion are ineligible from such exemptions.  42. ADUs built using City produced pre‐approved ADU base plans may  exceed the wall plate height of the primary structure by four feet (4’) and may be  allowed an additional height allowance upon application and approval of a  modification pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐250. Applicant produced ADU plans seeking to  exceed the wall plate height of the primary structure may be allowed upon  application and approval of a modification pursuant to RMC 4‐9‐250.  SECTION IV. Subsection 4‐2‐116.B.2 of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as  shown below. All other provisions in 4‐2‐116.B remain in effect and unchanged.  B. APPLICABILITY:  1. This Section shall apply to ADUs in the following zones: Residential‐4 (R‐ 4), Residential‐6 (R‐6), Residential‐8 (R‐8), Residential‐10 (R‐10), and Residential‐ 14 (R‐14).  2. If the primary structure where the ADU is proposed does not comply  with the adopted architectural detailing standards adopted in the Residential  Design standards (RMC 4‐2‐115E3), the primary structure shall be brought to  proportional compliance prior to the issuance of ADU building permits.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  a. The amount invested in physical improvements to reduce or  eliminate the nonconformity related to the architectural detailing shall be  determined by multiplying the valuation of the ADU, as determined by the City,  by ten percent (10%).  b. The Department shall evaluate and approve the allocation of the  required investment in bringing the primary structure into compliance based on  the above formula and RMC 4‐2‐115E3.   SECTION V. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION VI. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2141:10/28/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. f) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING  SUBSECTION 4‐9‐070.R OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE  STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) APPEALS PROCESS, PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State  of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. Subsection 4‐9‐070.R of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as follows:  R. APPEALS:   1.  Except for permits and variances issued pursuant to RMC 4‐3‐090,  Shoreline Master Program Regulations, when any proposal or action is granted,  conditioned, or denied on the basis of SEPA substantive authority by a nonelected  official other than the Hearing Examiner, the decision shall be appealable to the  Hearing Examiner under the provisions of RMC 4‐8‐110, Appeals.  When such a  AGENDA ITEM # 9. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  proposal or action is conditioned or denied on the basis of SEPA substantive  authority by an elected official or by the Hearing Examiner, there shall be no  administrative appeal.  2.  Except for permits and variances issued pursuant to RMC 4‐3‐090,  Shoreline Master Program Regulations, when any proposal or action is challenged  as to a SEPA procedural determination, there shall be no administrative appeal.  SECTION III. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM # 9. g) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2126:10/5/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. g) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVISING  REGULATIONS RELATING TO GOVERNMENT FACILITIES BY AMENDING  SUBSECTION 4‐2‐060.G OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE  DEFINITION OF “GOVERNMENT FACILITIES, OTHER” IN SECTION 4‐11‐070 OF THE  RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS OF “GOVERNMENT  MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, OTHER” AND “GOVERNMENT OFFICE, OTHER” TO  SECTION 4‐11‐070 OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and  WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 6, 2020, the City notified the State  of Washington of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. All portions of the Renton Municipal Code in this ordinance not shown in  strikethrough and underline edits remain in effect and unchanged.  SECTION II. The “Other government offices and facilities” row in subsection 4‐2‐060.G  of the Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown in Attachment A. 4‐2‐060.G is further  amended by adding new rows for “Other government maintenance facilities” and “Other  government offices” to read as shown in Attachment A. All other provisions in 4‐2‐060.G remain  in effect and unchanged.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. h) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  SECTION III. The definition of “Government Facilities, Other” in section 4‐11‐070 of the  Renton Municipal Code is amended as shown below. Section 4‐11‐070 is further amended to add  new definitions in alphabetical order of “Government Maintenance Facilities, Other” and  “Government Office, Other” to read as shown below. All other definitions in 4‐11‐070 remain in  effect and unchanged.  GOVERNMENT FACILITIES, OTHER: Facilities of any unit of county, state, federal,  or special district a government agency other than the City. Types of facilities  include community centers, vehicle and drivers licensing offices, public works  maintenance facilities, courts of law, school support facilities, and other types of  county, state, school district, special district, or federal facilities. This definition  excludes offices, jails, parks, transit centers, park and& rides, sewage treatment  plants, schools, municipally owned golf courses or airports, and libraries, storage  of vehicles, and maintenance facilities, or other uses otherwise identified in 4‐2‐ 060.   GOVERNMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, OTHER: A facility used by a  government agency other than the City as a place to maintain the equipment and  facilities of the government agency. It may also include the storage of materials  and vehicles used by the agency during maintenance.   GOVERNMENT OFFICE, OTHER: The administrative offices of a government  agency other than the City, where there is no direct provision of services to the  public. This does not include the storage of materials or vehicles.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. h) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  SECTION IV. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION V. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.      PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                         Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                         Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2139:11/10/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. h) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 4 ATTACHMENT A 4‐2‐060.G USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R‐1 R‐4 R‐6 R‐8 RMH R‐10 R‐14 RMF IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC G. OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Other government offices and facilities H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Other government maintenance facilities             H  H               Other government offices        AD42  P P P AD P112 P P P P P92  AGENDA ITEM # 9. h) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. _______    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2020  AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MAPS, AND DATA  IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.    WHEREAS, the Council has heretofore adopted and filed a Comprehensive Plan and the  Council has implemented and amended the Comprehensive Plan from time to time, together  with the adoption of various codes, reports and records; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heretofore fully recommended to the Council,  from time to time, certain amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and   WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management  Act, periodically reviews its Comprehensive Plan; and   WHEREAS, as set forth in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the City’s  Residential‐8 (R‐8) zoning district is intended to implement the Residential Medium Density   (RMD) land use designation, but 21 R‐8‐zoned parcels north of the Virginia Mason Athletic Center  had been designated Residential High Density (RHD) instead of RMD; and  WHEREAS, the City’s Residential‐6 (R‐6) zoning district is intended to implement the RMD  land use designation, but one parcel along N 40th St and Lake Washington Blvd had been  designated RHD instead of RMD; and  WHEREAS, the City’s Residential‐10 (R‐10) zoning district is intended to implement the  RMD land use designation, but one parcel along NE 2nd Ln and Bremerton Ave NE had been  designated RMD instead of RHD; and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  WHEREAS, the City’s R‐8 and R‐10 zoning districts are intended to implement land use  designations RMD and RHD, respectively, but six parcels were split zoned R‐8 and R‐10, resulting  in conflicting land use designations; and  WHEREAS, the City’s R‐6 and Residential‐4 (R‐4) zoning districts are intended to  implement land use designations RMD and Residential Low Density (RLD), respectively, but a  driveway tract on Duvall Pl SE serving four R‐4 zoned residences was split zoned R‐4 and R‐6, and  the total tract had been designated RLD; and  WHEREAS, the City’s R‐8 and R‐10 zoning districts are intended to implement land use  designations RMD and RHD, respectively, but two parcels off of NE 4th St at Garden Ave N and  Factory Ave N, were split zoned R‐8 and R‐10, resulting in conflicting land use designations; and  WHEREAS, the City’s Resource Conservation (RC) zoning district is intended to implement  land use designation RLD, but one parcel at the entrance to the Cedar River Nature Trail had been  designated RMD and RLD instead of solely RLD; and  WHEREAS, the City’s Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning district is intended to implement  land use designation Commercial Mixed Use (CMU), but one CA zoned parcel at the intersection  of Renton Ave S and SW Victoria St, surrounded entirely by R‐10 parcels, had been designated  RHD; and  WHEREAS, the City’s R‐8, R‐10, and CA zoning districts are intended to implement land  use designations RMD, RHD, and CMU, respectively, but two  Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) split  zoned parcels had not been designated the correct proportional amount RMD, RHD, and CMU  equal to that of the area comprised by the R‐8, R‐10, and CA zoning; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  WHEREAS, the City’s CA, Industrial‐Medium (IM) and Residential Multi Family (RMF)  zoning districts are intended to implement land use designations CMU, Employment Area (EA),  and RHD, respectively, but two Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Right‐of‐Way parcels had  not been designated the correct proportional amount CMU, EA, and RHD equal to that of the  area comprised by the CA, IM, and RMF zoning; and  WHEREAS, as set forth in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the City’s CA  zoning district is intended to implement both the EA land use designation and CMU land use  designation, but the CMU land use designation will ensure consistency with the land use  designation of other adjacent parcels where mixed‐use development is expected to occur; and  WHEREAS, it is appropriate for a small portion of the Benson Hill Community immediately  south of SE Petrovitsky Rd to have the current land use designation of RLD be amended to RMD  land use designation because the area can serve as a transition between the significant critical  areas that lie to the east and the higher density zoned area to the west; and  WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on this matter on September 16, 2020; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations to  the Council; and   WHEREAS, the Council has duly determined after due consideration of the evidence  before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's Comprehensive Plan;  and   WHEREAS, such modification and elements for the Comprehensive Plan being in the best  interest for the public benefit;  AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I.  The above findings and recitals are found to be true and correct in all  respects.  SECTION II. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby modified, amended, and  adopted as reflected in Attachment A, which attachment shows the 21 parcels within the City’s  Kennydale Area that are changed from the RHD land use designation to the RMD land use  designation.   SECTION III. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment B, which attachment shows one parcel within the City’s  Kennydale Area that is changed from the RHD land use designation to the RMD land use  designation.   SECTION IV.    The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment C, which attachment shows one parcel within the City’s  Highlands Area that is changed from the RMD land use designation to the RHD land use  designation.   SECTION V.    The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment D, which attachment shows six parcels with the following  changes:  The west segment of PID 152305UNKN, PID 0100300610, PID 0100300120, PID  0100300240, PID 0100300620: Split land use designation RMD and RHD changed to land use  designation RMD.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  PID 0100300280: Split land use designation RMD and RHD changed to land use  designation RHD.   SECTION VI. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment E, which attachment shows two parcels within the City  Center with split land use designations RHD and CMU changed to land use designation RHD.  SECTION VII.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment F, which attachment shows one parcel within the City’s  Cedar River area with split land use designations RLD and COR changed to land use designation  RLD.  SECTION VIII.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment G, which attachment shows a segment of the SPU  waterline within the City’s West Hill and City Center Areas changed to land use designation RHD.  SECTION IX.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment H, which attachment shows a segment of the BNSF Right‐ of‐Way within the City’s Employment Area with split land use designations RHD and EA changed  to land use designation RHD.  SECTION X.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment I, which attachment shows one parcel within the City  Center with split land use designations EA and CMU changed to land use designation CMU.   SECTION XI.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment J, which attachment shows the parcel at 900 Lind Ave  SW that is changed from land use designation EA to land use designation CMU.  AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  SECTION XII.  The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby also modified, amended,  and adopted as reflected in Attachment K, which attachment shows 29 parcels south of SE  Petrovitsky Rd, west of 118th Ave SE, north of SE 180th St, east of 116th Ave SE that are changed  from land use designation RLD to land use designation RMD.  SECTION XIII.  The Community and Economic Development Administrator is hereby  authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City's Comprehensive Plan and  the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforementioned amendments.  SECTION XIV.  The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as provided  by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City  Clerk of the City of Renton.  SECTION XV.  This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                             Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                             Armondo Pavone, Mayor    AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication:        ORD:2144:11/2/2020    AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT A Residential Area North of Seahawks Training Camp Action: Change land use to RMD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 8 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT B N 40th St & Lake Washington Blvd Action: Change land use to RMD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 9 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT C 4433 NE 2nd Ln Action: Change land use to RHD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 10 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT D NE 4th St & Hoquiam Ave NE Action: Designate parcels RMD and RHD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 11 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT E NE 4th St & Hoquiam Ave NE Action: Designate both parcels RHD  ORDINANCE NO. ________ 12 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT F Cedar River Natural Area Action: Designate parcel RLD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 13 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT G Seattle Public Utilities Waterline Action: Designate westerly and center parcels RHD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 14 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT H BNSF ROW Action: Designate parcel RHD ORDINANCE NO. ________ 15 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT I Wal-Mart Action: Designate parcel CMU ORDINANCE NO. ________ 16 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT J M:01 900 Lind Ave Action: Designate Parcels CMU  Land Use Designation ORDINANCE NO. ________ 17 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) ATTACHMENT K M:03 Benson Upland Group Action: Designate Parcels RMD Land Use Designation ORDINANCE NO. ________ 18 AGENDA ITEM # 9. i) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. _______     AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE  ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ONE PARCEL (KING COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER  1923059047) WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM) TO  COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) (CPA 2019‐M‐01) AND ESTABLISHING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE.      WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the  Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the parcel identified as King County Parcel  Number 1923059047 and depicted in Attachment A (the “Property”) has heretofore been zoned  as Industrial Medium (IM); and   WHEREAS, the City initiated the proceeding change of zone classification of the Property  with the support of the Property owner; and  WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the Property be zoned as  Commercial Arterial (CA); and   WHEREAS, said zoning request being in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan,  as amended; and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. j) ORDINANCE NO. ________    2  WHEREAS, the City Council considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in  support or opposition;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:   SECTION I.  The  Property is hereby rezoned to Commercial Arterial (CA).  The Planning  Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the Official Zoning Map of the City, as  amended, to evidence said rezoning, to‐wit:   See Attachment A attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.      SECTION II.  This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.   PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                        Jason Seth, City Clerk     APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                            Armondo Pavone, Mayor      AGENDA ITEM # 9. j) ORDINANCE NO. ________    3  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication: ________________    ORD:2145:11/4/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. j) 4Attachment AZoning Map Changefrom Industrial, Medium(IM) to CommercialArterial (CA)900 Lind Ave SWParcel Number1923059047Car Pros KiaZoning Map ChangeORDINANCE NO.__________4AGENDA ITEM # 9. j) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. _______    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE  ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 14 PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON AND  ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.     WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the six parcels depicted in Attachment A bound  by NE 4th St and Field Pl NE to the north and west of Hoquiam Ave NE, have heretofore been split  zoned as Residential‐8 (R‐8) and Residential‐10 (R‐10); and  WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the parcel depicted in Attachment B located south  of Elma Pl SE, north of SE 2nd Pl, and east of Duvall Ave SE has heretofore been split zoned  Residential‐4 (R‐4) and Residential‐6 (R‐6); and  WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the western segment of the parcel depicted in  Attachment C containing a utilities right‐of‐way bound by S 134th St to the north, 84th Ave S to  the east, SW Langston Rd to the south, and Oakesdale Ave SW to the west has heretofore been  split zoned R‐8 and R‐10; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the two parcels depicted in Attachment D located  south of N 4th St, west of Factory Ave N, east of Garden Ave N, and N 3rd St to the south have  heretofore been split zoned R‐8 and R‐10; and   WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the parcel depicted in Attachment E bound by  Renton Ave S to the northwest, Hardie Ave SW to the east, and SW Victoria St to the south has  heretofore been zoned CA; and WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the parcel depicted in Attachment F containing a  utility right‐of‐way north of SW 7th St and west of Hardie Ave SW has heretofore been split zoned  Residential Multi‐Family (RMF), CA, and Center Downtown (CD); and  WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, a second parcel depicted in Attachment F  containing a utility right‐of‐way north of SW 7th St and west of Hardie Ave SW has heretofore  been split zoned RMF and CA; and   WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the parcel depicted in Attachment G bound by SW  7th St to the north, Hardie Ave SW and Rainier Ave S to the east, S Grady Way to the south, and  Lind Ave SW to the west has heretofore been split zoned CA and Industrial‐Medium (IM); and WHEREAS, the City initiated the proceeding change of zone classification for the King  County Parcels described above and depicted in Attachments A‐G; and  WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by Planning Commission; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the five of the six parcels that  compromise the area bound by NE 4th St and Field Pl NE to the north and west of Hoquiam Ave  NE be zoned R‐8 and one parcel be zoned R‐10 as depicted in Attachment A; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended a parcel south of Elma Pl SE, north of  SE 2nd Pl, and east of Duvall Ave SE be zoned R‐4 as depicted in Attachment B; and  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the western segment of the parcel  containing a utilities right‐of‐way bound by S 134th St to the north, 84th Ave S to the east, SW  Langston Rd to the south, and Oakesdale Ave SW to the west be zoned R‐10 as depicted in  Attachment C; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the parcels south of N 4th St, west of  Factory Ave N, east of Garden Ave N, and N 3rd St to the south be zoned R‐10 as depicted in  Attachment D; and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the parcel bound by Renton Ave S to  the northwest, Hardie Ave SW to the east, and SW Victoria St to the south be zoned R‐10 as  depicted in Attachment E; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the parcels containing a utility right‐ of‐way north of SW 7th St and west of Hardie Ave SW be zoned RMF as depicted in Attachment  F; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the parcel bound by SW 7th St to the  north, Hardie Ave SW and Rainier Ave S to the east, S Grady Way to the south, and Lind Ave SW  to the west be zoned CA as depicted in Attachment G; and   WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and   WHEREAS, said zoning requests being in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, as  amended; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and   WHEREAS, the City Council considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in  support or opposition;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I.  The following parcels are hereby rezoned as follows:   AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  Five of the six parcels depicted in Attachment A are hereby rezoned to R‐8 and the  remaining parcel is hereby rezoned R‐10; and  The parcel depicted in Attachment B is hereby rezoned to R‐4; and   The parcel depicted in Attachment C is hereby rezoned to R‐10; and  The parcels depicted in Attachment D are hereby rezoned to R‐10; and  The parcel depicted in Attachment E is hereby rezoned to R‐10; and  The parcels depicted in Attachment F are hereby rezoned to RMF; and  The parcel depicted in Attachment G is hereby rezoned to CA.  See Attachments A‐G attached hereto and made a part of hereof as if fully set forth  herein.  SECTION II.  This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                            Jason Seth, City Clerk     APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                            Armondo Pavone, Mayor      AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication: ________________    ORD:2147:11/10/2020    AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT A NE 4th St & Hoquiam Ave NEAction: Assign single zone (R-8 or R-10) to each parcelORDINANCE NO. ________7AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT B Duvall Pl SE Action: Zone entire parcel R-4 ORDINANCE NO. ________ 8 AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT C SPU Waterline ParcelsAction: Assign R-10 zone to westerly parcelORDINANCE NO. ________9AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT DNE 4th St at Garden Ave N & Factory Ave NAction: Assign R-10 zone both parcelsORDINANCE NO. ________10AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT E Renton Ave S and SW Victoria St Action: Change zoning to R-10 ORDINANCE NO. ________ 11 AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT F BNSF Right of WayAction: Assign RMF zoning to both parcelsORDINANCE NO. ________12AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) ATTACHMENT G WalmartAction: Assign CA zoning to entire parcelORDINANCE NO. ________13AGENDA ITEM # 9. k) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. _______     AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE  ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF TWENTY‐NINE PARCELS BOUNDED BY SE  PETROVITSKY ROAD TO THE NORTH, 118TH AVENUE SE TO THE EAST, SE 180TH  STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND 116TH AVENUE SE TO THE WEST WITHIN THE CITY  OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL FOUR (R‐4) TO RESIDENTIAL SIX (R‐6) (CPA 2019‐ M‐03) AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.      WHEREAS, under Section 4‐2‐020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts – Uses and Standards, of  Title IV (Development Regulations), of the  Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps  and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property herein below described has  heretofore been zoned as Residential Four (R‐4); and   WHEREAS, on behalf of 14 property owners, including the Applicant, who together own  18 contiguous lots of the 29 parcels within the block bounded by SE Petrovitsky Road to the north,  118th Avenue SE to the east, SE 180th Street to the south, and 116th Avenue SE to the west  (hereinafter, the 29 parcels are collectively the “Property”), an application was submitted and a  proceeding for change of zone classification of said Property was initiated; and  WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation  and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2020,  considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently  forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and   WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the Property be zoned as Residential  Six (R‐6); and   AGENDA ITEM # 9. l) ORDINANCE NO. ________    2  WHEREAS, said zoning request being in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan,  as amended; and   WHEREAS, the City Council considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in  support or opposition;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:   SECTION I.  The Property is hereby rezoned to Residential Six (R‐6).  The Planning Division  is hereby authorized and directed to change the Official Zoning Map of the City, as amended, to  evidence said rezoning, to‐wit:   See Attachment A attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.      SECTION II.  This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication  of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.   PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                        Jason Seth, City Clerk     APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _____ day of _______________, 2020.                            Armondo Pavone, Mayor      AGENDA ITEM # 9. l) ORDINANCE NO. ________    3  Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication: ________________    ORD:2146:11/4/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. l) Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. ________ 4 AGENDA ITEM # 9. l)   1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO. ________    AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A  PORTION OF AN ALLEY, LOCATED NEAR 1300 BRONSON WAY N AND  SITUATED EAST OF GARDEN AVENUE N, WEST OF MEADOW AVENUE N,  NORTH OF BRONSON WAY N, AND SOUTH OF N 2ND STREET.   (1300 BRONSON  WAY N STREET VACATION; VAC‐20‐001.)    WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of right‐of‐way as hereinafter more  particularly described was filed with the City Clerk on July 21, 2020, and that petition was  signed by the owners representing more than two‐thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon  the street or alley to be vacated; and  WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4417, passed on October 5, 2020, set  October 19, 2020, at 7:00 p.m., by means of the Zoom video conferencing web application as  the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk gave proper notice  of this public hearing as provided by law, and all persons were heard who appeared to testify  in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council considered all information and  arguments presented to it to determine whether the vacation is in the public interest, whether  the property is not required for overall circulation of traffic within the City, and that the  requested vacation is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and  WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic  Development has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public  interest and for the public benefit, and that it is unlikely that injury or damage to any person  or properties will result from this vacation; and  AGENDA ITEM # 9. m) ORDINANCE NO. ________    2  WHEREAS, on December 7, 2020, the City Council determined that the vacation should  be granted and adopted the recommendation of the Department of Community and Economic  Development to set compensation at $0 for the right‐of‐way vacation;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I. The following described portion of an alley located near 1300 Bronson  Way N, to wit:  (A portion of an alley situated east of Garden Avenue N, west of Meadow  Avenue N, north of Bronson Way N, and south of N 2nd Street.)  See Exhibit A, and depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part  hereof as if fully set forth herein, is hereby vacated.  SECTION II. Compensation is hereby set at $0 for this right‐of‐way vacation.  SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after  publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall  consist of this ordinance’s title.      A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Recorder’s Office,  and as otherwise provided by law.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                       Jason A. Seth, City Clerk  AGENDA ITEM # 9. m) ORDINANCE NO. ________    3    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                       Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2150:12/1/2020  AGENDA ITEM # 9. m) RIGHT OF WAY VACATION Exhibit A Legal Description Project: WO# PID GRANTOR: Street: THE WEST 1.00 FEET OF THE 16.00 FOOT WIDE ALLEY IN BLOCK 1, CAR WORK'S ADDITION TO RENTON, PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTH 89°25'13" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF NORTH 2ND STREET, A DISTANCE OF 1.00 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL AND 1.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 8; THENCE SOUTH 01 °03'27" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 314.95 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF BRONSON WAY NORTH. THENCE SOUTH 81 °37'13" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 1.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH 01 °03'27" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERL V LINE OF SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 8, A DISTANCE OF 315.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 315 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AGENDA ITEM # 9. m) AGENDA ITEM # 9. m) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON  ORDINANCE NO. ________  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING AND  AMENDING THE INTERIM ZONING CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.  5974 IN RESPONSE TO THE OPERATIONAL LIMITS ON BUSINESSES DURING THE  COVID‐19 DECLARED PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY BY (1) EXTENDING THE  TEMPORARY “ECONOMIC RECOVERY REVOCABLE RIGHT‐OF‐WAY PERMIT” FOR  BUSINESSES; (2) EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY “ECONOMIC RECOVERY SIGNS”  FOR BUSINESSES; AND (3) AMENDING THE INTERIM ZONING CONTROL TO  WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR THE  TEMPORARY EXPANSION OF A BUSINESS INTO AN ADJACENT VACANT SPACE IN  A MULTI‐TENANT BUILDING; AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY DESIGNATION OF  A LIMITED NUMBER OF EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE CENTER  DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PARKING FOR SHORT‐TERM  CURBSIDE PICK‐UP OR TO GO ORDERS FROM BUSINESSES; TEMPORARILY  WAIVING PARKING FEES FOR PARKING FOR PERIODS OF UP TO 10 HOURS  WITHIN THE CITY’S CITY CENTER PARKING GARAGE LOCATED AT 655 SOUTH 2ND  STREET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND  ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.  WHEREAS, on July 13, 2020, in response to business‐related impacts due to the novel  coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic, the City Council adopted interim zoning controls via  Ordinance No. 5974, valid through December 31, 2020 or the date that the City enters Phase 4  of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever occurred first; and  WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5974 established a new type of temporary right‐of‐way permit  known as an “Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permit” which is similar to existing  right‐of‐way permits but does not carry a permit fee to assist businesses that are able to use  public right‐of‐way and/or their private parking lot areas in order to expand the area within which  customers could be served – in keeping with appropriate social distancing standards and other  public health guidelines – in order to help struggling businesses including restaurants survive and  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  2  help keep the employees who depend on the jobs that have been impacted and jeopardized by  the coronavirus shut‐downs employed; and   WHEREAS, parklets and prefabricated outdoor spaces meet the intended purpose of  “expanding the area within which a business may provide goods or services to customers while  keeping with public health guidelines” that served as the basis for establishing Economic  Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits, and, thus, the City Council wishes to allow for them  as an element of encouraging economic recovery in the City; and   WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5974 also established and temporarily allowed businesses to  place signs  known as “Economic Recovery Signs” in the form of A‐Frame Signs and Event Signs,  through December 31, 2020; and  WHEREAS, the City has not yet entered Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, and the  City Council has determined that there is a need to extend beyond December 31, 2020 the  interim zoning controls establishing the Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of Way Permit and   establishing and allowing Economic Recovery Signs; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further considered the impacts to City businesses and the  public caused by the COVID‐19 pandemic.  As a result, the City Council has determined that there  is a need to temporarily waive the requirement to obtain a Temporary Use Permit for the  following activity:  the temporary expansion of a business into an adjacent vacant space in a  multi‐tenant building in compliance with the Governor’s Safe Start plan and public heath  guidelines for COVID‐19; and   AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  3  WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 7, 2020, to consider a six‐ month extension of and amendment to the interim zoning controls established in Ordinance No.  5974; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that designating a limited number of  existing public parking stalls within the area zoned Center Downtown (CD) as short‐term parking  for curbside pick‐up or to go orders may also assist the struggling downtown business  community, and the City Council further finds that there is not a comparable need to designate  short‐term parking for businesses outside of the area zoned CD; and  WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that to accommodate the anticipated  increases in short‐term parking in the Center Downtown and to assist the struggling downtown  business community, hourly parking fees in the City’s City Center Parking Garage located at 655  S 2nd St. should be temporarily waived for parking periods of up to 10 hours;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN as follows:  SECTION I.  The above recitals are adopted as findings of fact in support of the interim  controls adopted herein pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, and are found to be  true and correct in all respects.   SECTION II.   Council hereby extends and amends the interim zoning control  temporarily establishing the new permit known as an Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of  Way Permit in the City of Renton.  Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits shall be:  (1) Available to businesses seeking to use the public right‐of‐way fronting their businesses  and/or their private parking lots abutting their businesses to expand the area within which  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  4  customers are served, such as for sidewalk sales, sidewalk pick‐up, parklets without structural  components, pre‐fabricated and engineered parklets, and/or outdoor restaurant seating.   Obtaining an Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permit for such uses shall not excuse a  business from complying with applicable public health requirements and guidelines, including  social distancing; and  (2) In effect from the date of issuance through June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters  Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever occurs first; and  (3)  Subject to the same application and review process as a revocable right‐of‐way permit  issued under RMC 4‐8‐120 and RMC Chapter 9‐2, except that no application fee or permit fee  shall be required; and  (4)  Subject to leasehold excise tax to the same extent as a revocable right‐of‐way permit  issued under RMC 4‐8‐120 and RMC Chapter 9‐2.  (5) For Economic Recovery Revocable Right‐of‐Way Permits that were approved and/or  issued between July 8, 2020 and December 31, 2020 and that were still valid and unexpired as of  the effective date of this ordinance, the following shall apply: The period of validity that would  otherwise apply under the standard expiration dates listed in this ordinance is extended until  June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start plan, whichever  occurs first.  SECTION III. As an interim zoning control, Council hereby extends the period for the  new sign type known as an Economic Recovery Sign in the City of Renton, by extending the same  regulations established under Ordinance No. 5974 for such signs.  Accordingly, Economic  Recovery Signs shall continue to be subject to the following for an extended period as stated:  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5  (1) Allowed for businesses to advertise economic recovery‐related events such as grand  re‐openings or expanded services or capacities; and  (2) Allowed in the form of A‐Frame Signs and Event Signs, as further specified below; and  (3) If an A‐Frame Sign, subject to the following standards and requirements drawn from  RMC 4‐4‐100.J.5:  a. Number:   i. Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: Only one of these signs is  permitted per business per street frontage.  ii. Elsewhere in the City: One of these signs is permitted per business per  street frontage and, in addition, an additional sign is permitted to be located  abutting the business and building to which the sign relates.  b. Location Requirements:         i. Permitted Location:  (1) Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: A‐frame signs must be  placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.  (2) Elsewhere in the City: A‐frame signs may be located on the  public sidewalk abutting the business site and/or within the  landscaping area on or abutting the business site, however, A‐frame  signs cannot be placed in the landscape strip between the curb and  outer edge of the public sidewalk. Additionally, for businesses  located within shopping centers, an additional A‐frame sign may be  placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  6  ii. Pedestrian Clearance: A minimum of four feet (4') of unobstructed  sidewalk area between the outer edge of the sign and the street curb is  required.   iii. Clear Vision Area: No sign shall be located as to pose a danger and violate  the clear vision area specified in subsection RMC 4‐4‐100.C.6, Prohibited  Signs. Where a traffic vision hazard is created, the City may require a  modification to the height or location of a sign to the degree necessary to  eliminate the hazard.  c. Size: Signs shall be no larger than thirty‐two inches (32") wide and thirty‐six  inches (36") tall.  d. Construction Specifications and Materials: The sign must be professionally  manufactured of durable material(s). No lighting or attachments, such as balloons  are permitted.  e. Maintenance and Appearance: Signs must be maintained in accordance with  the provisions of RMC 4‐4‐100.D.3, Sign Maintenance Required, and subsection  RMC 4‐4‐100.D.4, Appearance of Signs.   f. Alteration of Landscaping Prohibited: No landscaping may be damaged or  modified to accommodate an A‐frame sign. The City may require replacement of  any damaged landscaping pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐070.Q, Damaged Landscaping.   g. Removal upon Close of Business Required: A‐frame signs shall not be displayed  during nonbusiness hours.  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  7  h. Proof of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement for Signs on Public Right‐of‐ Way: Before placing any such A‐Frame sign, the business must provide the  Community & Economic Development Department’s Development Services  Division with (1) proof of general commercial liability insurance (certificate of  liability insurance) meeting the requirements of RMC 4‐4‐100.L.4 and (2) a signed  hold harmless agreement that specifies that the owner of the sign will defend,  indemnify, and hold the City harmless for any loss, injuries, damage, claims or  lawsuit, including attorney’s fees that arise from the sign.  i. Confiscation of Signs: Signs that do not comply with these provisions may be  confiscated by the City; and  (4) If an Event Sign, subject to the following standards and requirements drawn from RMC  4‐4‐100.J.6:      a.  [Intentionally omitted.]  b. Types of Event Signage Allowed: Any combination of the following types of  signage are permitted: balloons, pole/wall strung and wall‐hung banners not  exceeding one hundred (100) square feet each in size, pole‐hung banners not  exceeding twenty (20) square feet each in size, flags, inflatable statuary,  pennants/streamers, searchlights, wind animated objects, and other similar  advertising devices approved by the Development Services Division. Rigid portable  signs are also allowed provided the sign is a maximum of thirty‐two (32) square  feet in area on one face per sign not exceeding six feet (6') in height. Rigid portable  signs are limited to one per street frontage outside the Automall.  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  8  c. [Intentionally omitted.]  d. [Intentionally omitted.]  e. Placement Limitations for Event Signs:  i. Roof: No sign or advertising device shall be placed on top of a roof or extend  vertically above the fascia of the building.   ii. Perimeter Street Landscaping: Event signage shall not be located within  required perimeter street landscaping; and  (5) Allowed without a permit and without a fee through June 7, 2021.  SECTION IV. As an interim zoning control, Council hereby temporarily waives the  requirement to obtain a Temporary Use Permit for the temporary expansion of a business into  an adjacent vacant space in a multi‐tenant building in compliance  with the Governor’s Safe Start  plan and public heath guidelines for COVID‐19.  All other permits required for such expansions  shall continue to be required.  SECTION V.  Council hereby temporarily approves the designation by the Administrator  of the Public Works Department, or designee, of a limited number of existing public parking stalls  within the Center Downtown (CD) zone to support short‐term parking for curbside pick‐up or to  go orders from businesses located in the City center.    SECTION VI. Council hereby temporarily waives the following parking fees established in  Section III of the City of Renton Fee Schedule for the following parking periods within the City  Center Parking Garage:     Zero (0) to two (2) hours;   Two (2) to four (4) hours;  AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  9   Four (4) to six (6) hours; and   Six (6) to (10) hours.  SECTION VII. The Mayor or his designee is authorized to implement any and all  administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.  SECTION VIII. A public hearing was held on December 7, 2020.  SECTION IX.  The interim controls extended, amended, and established herein shall be  in effect until June 7, 2021 or the date that the City enters Phase 4 of the Governor’s Safe Start  plan, whichever occurs first, unless earlier lifted or subsequently extended by action of the City  Council.  SECTION X. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work of this  ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent jurisdiction,  such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of any other  section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.  SECTION XI. The City Council declares an emergency for the protection of the public  welfare and to enable the purpose and intent of this ordinance to be accomplished. This  ordinance shall take effect immediately when passed by the City Council. The City Clerk shall  cause to be published a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary  shall consist of this ordinance’s title.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                             Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    AGENDA ITEM # n) ORDINANCE NO. ________  10  APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2020.                             Armondo Pavone, Mayor    Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney    Date of Publication:        ORD:2151:12/3/2020  AGENDA ITEM # n) 1  CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON    ORDINANCE NO.         AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY  OF RENTON FISCAL YEARS 2019/2020 BIENNIAL BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY  ORDINANCE NO. 5898, IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,166,453, ADOPTING AN  AMENDED 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE, AND ESTABLISHING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE.    WHEREAS, on November 19, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5898 adopting  the City of Renton’s 2019/2020 Biennial Budget; and  WHEREAS, on April 22, 2019, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5924 carrying forward  funds appropriated in 2018, but not expended in 2018 due to capital project interruptions and  delays in invoice payments, which needed to be carried forward and appropriated for  expenditure in 2019, which required an adjustment to the 2019/2020 Biennial Budget; and  WHEREAS, on July 15, 2019, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5930 making minor  corrections and recognizing grants, contributions and associated costs and new cost items not  previously included in the budget, which required additional adjustments to the 2019/2020  Biennial Budget; and  WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5930 also adopted amended job classifications and pay ranges  for City employees for 2019; and  WHEREAS,  on November 18, 2019, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5939, providing a  mid‐biennial review pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, renaming the 1% For Arts Fund 125 to  Municipal Arts Fund 125, and adopting amended job classifications and pay ranges for City  employees for 2019/2020; and    AGENDA ITEM # o) ORDINANCE NO. ________    2  WHEREAS, on May 4, 2020, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5969 carrying forward  funds appropriated in 2019, but not expended in 2019 due to capital project interruptions and  delays in invoice payments, which needed to be carried forward and appropriated for  expenditure in 2020; and  WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5969 also created the following new funds: Economic  Development Reserve Fund 098, Police Seizure Fund 140, Police CSAM Seizure Fund 141, REET 1  Fund 308, and REET 2 Fund 309, to better track the resources and costs of the City; and  WHEREAS, on August 3, 2020, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5975 making  adjustments for budget reductions in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, making minor  corrections and recognizing grants, contributions and associated costs, additional fund transfers,  and new cost items not previously included in the budget, which required additional adjustments  to the 2019/2020 Biennial Budget; and  WHEREAS,  minor corrections and the recognition of grants, contributions and associated  costs, and new cost items not previously included in the budget require additional amendments  to the 2019/2020 Biennial Budget; and  WHEREAS, it is necessary to adopt amended job classifications and pay ranges for City  employees for 2020;  NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO  ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION I.   Ordinance Nos.  5898, 5924, 5930, 5939, 5969, and 5975 establishing the  City of Renton’s 2019/2020 Biennial Budget are hereby amended in the total amount of  $12,166,453 for an amended total of $845,857,129 over the biennium.  AGENDA ITEM # o) ORDINANCE NO. ________    3  SECTION II.  The City Council hereby adopts the amended 2019/2020 Biennial Budget.  The 2020 Year End Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund is attached as Exhibit A and the 2019  Adjusted Budget Summary by Fund is attached as Exhibit B.  Detailed lists of adjustments are  available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall.  SECTION III.     The City Council hereby adopts amended job classifications and pay ranges  for City employees for 2020 as set forth in Exhibit C as of the effective dates shown therein.     SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper.  The summary shall consist of this  ordinance’s title.  PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2020.                              Jason A. Seth, City Clerk    APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _______________________, 2020.                          Armondo Pavone, Mayor      Approved as to form:             Shane Moloney, City Attorney  Date of Publication:      ORD:2149:11/3/2020  AGENDA ITEM # o) ORDINANCE NO. _______  4    Exhibit A:  2020 Year End Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund    BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCEFund 2020 Beg Fund Bal  Changes  2020 Adj.  Fund Bal  2020 Budgeted Revenue  Changes  2020 Adjusted Revenue  2020 Budgeted Expenditure  Changes  2020 Adjusted Expenditure  Ending Fund Balance  Reserved/ Designated  Available Fund Balance 0XX GENERAL FUND48,056,982       ‐                                 48,056,982      131,167,345     (11,041,175)    120,126,170    124,162,622     4,572,993        128,735,615    39,447,537       (16,494,674)    22,952,863       110  SPECIAL HOTEL‐MOTEL TAX943,889             ‐                                 943,889            200,000             25,000              225,000            466,562             (12,500)             454,062            714,827             714,827             125  MUNICIPAL ARTS98,865                ‐                                 98,865               180,660              ‐                          180,660            271,790              ‐                          271,790            7,735                  7,735                  127  CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT603,760             ‐                                 603,760            97,674                ‐                          97,674              97,674                ‐                          97,674              603,760             603,760             135  SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK345,658             ‐                                 345,658             ‐                            ‐                           ‐                           ‐                            ‐                           ‐                          345,658             345,658             140  POLICE SEIZURE‐                           ‐                                  ‐                          711,102              ‐                          711,102            711,102              ‐                          711,102             ‐                            ‐                           141  POLICE CSAM SEIZURE‐                           ‐                                  ‐                          126,011              ‐                          126,011            126,011              ‐                          126,011             ‐                            ‐                           215  GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC3,999,457          ‐                                 3,999,456         8,143,007         7,977                 8,150,984        7,162,386          ‐                          7,162,386        4,988,054          (2,717,575)      2,270,479          303  COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION1,886,999          ‐                                 1,886,999         86,500                ‐                          86,500              945,909              ‐                          945,909            1,027,590          1,027,590          305  TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION2,942,344          ‐                                 2,942,344         1,435,875          ‐                          1,435,875        1,811,987          ‐                          1,811,987        2,566,233          2,566,233          308  REET 1‐                           ‐                                  ‐                          3,143,855          ‐                          3,143,855        1,775,000         646,000            2,421,000        722,855             722,855             309  REET 2‐                           ‐                                  ‐                          3,143,855          ‐                          3,143,855        1,775,000         (82,596)             1,692,404        1,451,452          1,451,452          316  MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP26,395,567       ‐                                 26,395,567      6,880,571         462,000            7,342,571        32,171,063       462,000            32,633,063      1,105,076          1,105,076          317  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT18,947,853       ‐                                 18,947,853      27,128,339       5,606,527        32,734,866      45,298,768       6,312,605        51,611,373      71,346                71,346                326  HOUSING OPPORTUNITY/ECO DEV REVOLVING2,570,350          ‐                                 2,570,350         6,309                   ‐                          6,309                 2,576,659          ‐                          2,576,659         ‐                            ‐                           336  NEW LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT16,408                ‐                                 16,408                ‐                            ‐                           ‐                           ‐                            ‐                           ‐                          16,408                16,408                346  NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT8,551,401          ‐                                 8,551,401         75,000                ‐                          75,000              648,948              ‐                          648,948            7,977,453          7,977,453          402  AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 6,259,402          ‐                                 6,259,402         3,051,767          ‐                          3,051,767        7,848,424         51,446              7,899,870        1,411,299          (185,119)          1,226,180          403  SOLID WASTE UTILITY2,266,127          ‐                                 2,266,127         19,616,816        ‐                          19,616,816      19,367,083        ‐                          19,367,083      2,515,861          (400,000)          2,115,861          404  GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 173,750             ‐                                 173,750            2,872,920          ‐                          2,872,920        2,476,682          ‐                          2,476,682        569,988             (601,171)          (31,183)              405  WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 37,569,067       ‐                                 37,569,067      19,516,652        ‐                          19,516,652      49,940,511        ‐                          49,940,511      7,145,208          (1,519,861)      5,625,346          406  WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 19,832,351       ‐                                 19,832,351      11,630,784        ‐                          11,630,784      25,800,350        ‐                          25,800,350      5,662,785          (812,562)          4,850,223          407  SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 18,377,556       ‐                                 18,377,556      25,542,717       125,000            25,667,717      31,136,102       118,125            31,254,227      12,791,045       (959,379)          11,831,666       416  KING COUNTY METRO5,961,906          ‐                                 5,961,906         17,007,226        ‐                          17,007,226      17,007,226        ‐                          17,007,226      5,961,906          5,961,906          501  EQUIPMENT RENTAL6,851,811          ‐                                 6,851,811         3,599,714          ‐                          3,599,714        4,815,199         90,000              4,905,199        5,546,326          5,546,326          502  INSURANCE19,095,508       ‐                                 19,095,508      3,371,506          ‐                          3,371,506        7,829,878          ‐                          7,829,878        14,637,136       (13,994,674)    642,462             503  INFORMATION SERVICES4,490,062          ‐                                 4,490,062         5,509,868         10,727              5,520,595        7,635,416         8,381                 7,643,797        2,366,861          2,366,861          504  FACILITIES1,220,276          ‐                                 1,220,276         4,313,651          ‐                          4,313,651        5,079,561          ‐                          5,079,561        454,367             454,367             505  COMMUNICATIONS803,561             ‐                                 803,561            1,177,126          ‐                          1,177,126        1,263,537          ‐                          1,263,537        717,150             717,150             512  HEALTHCARE INSURANCE5,151,648          ‐                                 5,151,648         12,649,694        ‐                          12,649,694      12,499,905        ‐                          12,499,905      5,301,437          (3,749,972)      1,551,465          522  LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE15,799,729       ‐                                 15,799,729      244,462              ‐                          244,462            1,248,243          ‐                          1,248,243        14,795,948       (14,795,948)     ‐                           304  FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION2,120,558          ‐                                 2,120,558         99,000                ‐                          99,000              113,808              ‐                          113,808            2,105,750          (2,105,750)       ‐                           611  FIREMENS PENSION7,565,902          ‐                                 7,565,902         468,000              ‐                          468,000            200,475              ‐                          200,475            7,833,427          (7,833,427)       ‐                             Total Other Funds220,841,765     ‐                                 220,841,765    182,030,662     6,237,231        188,267,893    290,101,258     7,593,461        297,694,719    111,414,939     (49,675,436)    61,739,503      TOTAL ALL FUNDS 268,898,747     ‐                                 268,898,747    313,198,007     (4,803,944)       308,394,063    414,263,881     12,166,453      426,430,334    150,862,476     (66,170,110)    84,692,365      2 year total644,164,976     (4,803,944)       639,361,032    833,690,676     12,166,453      845,857,129    150,862,476     (66,170,110)    84,692,365      AGENDA ITEM # o) ORDINANCE NO. ________  5   Exhibit B:  2019 Adjusted Budget Summary by Fund   BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCEFund2019 Beg Fund BalChanges2019  Adj Fund Bal2019 BudgetedChanges2019 Adjusted2019 BudgetedChanges2019 AdjustedEnding Fund BalanceReserved/ DesignatedAvailable Fund Balance0XX GENERAL FUND44,542,987    ‐                   44,542,987   125,561,221     ‐                    125,561,221 133,793,547     ‐                    133,793,547 36,310,660    (11,374,240)  24,936,420    102  ARTERIAL STREETS163,671         ‐                   163,671        103,365            ‐                    103,365        267,036            ‐                    267,036         ‐                      ‐                     110  SPECIAL HOTEL‐MOTEL TAX722,387         ‐                   722,387        225,000            ‐                    225,000        444,647            ‐                    444,647        502,740         502,740         125  MUNICIPAL ARTS119,446         ‐                   119,446        102,000            ‐                    102,000        204,683            ‐                    204,683        16,764           16,764           127  CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT529,159         ‐                   529,159        97,674              ‐                    97,674          105,674            ‐                    105,674        521,159         521,159         135  SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK340,895         ‐                   340,895         ‐                       ‐                     ‐                     ‐                       ‐                     ‐                    340,895         340,895         215  GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC2,307,173      ‐                   2,307,173     8,444,717         ‐                    8,444,717     7,914,936         ‐                    7,914,936     2,836,954      (2,717,575)    119,379         303  COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION2,578,256      ‐                   2,578,256     86,500              ‐                    86,500          1,200,000         ‐                    1,200,000     1,464,756      1,464,756      305  TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION3,332,524      ‐                   3,332,524     1,020,000         ‐                    1,020,000     2,324,200         ‐                    2,324,200     2,028,324      2,028,324      316  MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP20,675,238    ‐                   20,675,238   20,470,370       ‐                    20,470,370   39,952,505       ‐                    39,952,505   1,193,102      1,193,102      317  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT5,492,313      ‐                   5,492,313     40,114,969       ‐                    40,114,969   43,712,273       ‐                    43,712,273   1,895,009      1,895,009      326  HOUSING OPPORTUNITY/ECO DEV REVOLVING2,582,203      ‐                   2,582,203     21,500              ‐                    21,500          68,900              ‐                    68,900          2,534,803      (2,500,000)    34,803           336  NEW LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT456,591         ‐                   456,591         ‐                       ‐                     ‐                    445,591            ‐                    445,591        11,000           11,000           346  NEW FAMILY FIRST CENTER DEVELOPMENT4,193,806      ‐                   4,193,806     5,075,000         ‐                    5,075,000     1,389,638         ‐                    1,389,638     7,879,168      7,879,168      402  AIRPORT OPERATIONS & CIP 4,985,377      ‐                   4,985,377     3,298,685         ‐                    3,298,685     7,912,888         ‐                    7,912,888     371,174         (181,653)       189,521         403  SOLID WASTE UTILITY2,276,333      ‐                   2,276,333     19,512,021       ‐                    19,512,021   19,403,677       ‐                    19,403,677   2,384,676      (400,000)       1,984,676      404  GOLF COURSE SYSTEM & CAPITAL 110,812         ‐                   110,812        2,447,340         ‐                    2,447,340     2,354,233         ‐                    2,354,233     203,919         (468,149)       (264,230)        405  WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 38,002,973    ‐                    ‐                    18,841,192       ‐                    18,841,192   48,784,107       ‐                    48,784,107   8,060,058      (3,033,114)    5,026,944      406  WASTEWATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 18,879,201    ‐                   18,879,201   11,582,615       ‐                    11,582,615   24,728,976       ‐                    24,728,976   5,732,840      (1,862,878)    3,869,962      407  SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS & CAPITAL 16,356,030    ‐                   16,356,030   20,608,113       ‐                    20,608,113   26,628,203       ‐                    26,628,203   10,335,940    (1,231,544)    9,104,396      416  KING COUNTY METRO5,512,418      ‐                   5,512,418     16,922,613       ‐                    16,922,613   16,922,613       ‐                    16,922,613   5,512,418      5,512,418      501  EQUIPMENT RENTAL6,493,018      ‐                   6,493,018     7,705,395         ‐                    7,705,395     9,249,649         ‐                    9,249,649     4,948,764      4,948,764      502  INSURANCE18,522,154    ‐                   18,522,154   3,343,143         ‐                    3,343,143     4,216,235         ‐                    4,216,235     17,649,063    (15,874,475)  1,774,588      503  INFORMATION SERVICES3,934,408      ‐                   3,934,408     6,122,843         ‐                    6,122,843     7,758,840         ‐                    7,758,840     2,298,411      2,298,411      504  FACILITIES1,376,859      ‐                   1,376,859     5,318,843         ‐                    5,318,843     5,538,128         ‐                    5,538,128     1,157,574      1,157,574      505  COMMUNICATIONS685,593         ‐                   685,593        1,105,816         ‐                    1,105,816     1,132,460         ‐                    1,132,460     658,949         658,949         512  HEALTHCARE INSURANCE4,259,511      ‐                   4,259,511     11,027,762       ‐                    11,027,762   11,655,841       ‐                    11,655,841   3,631,432      (3,496,752)    134,680         522  LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE13,876,628    ‐                   13,876,628   1,241,273         ‐                    1,241,273     978,262            ‐                    978,262        14,139,639    (14,139,639)   ‐                     304  FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION1,455,669      ‐                   1,455,669     99,000              ‐                    99,000          128,576            ‐                    128,576        1,426,093      1,426,093      611  FIREMENS PENSION7,146,983      ‐                   7,146,983     468,000            ‐                    468,000        210,475            ‐                    210,475        7,404,508      (7,404,508)     ‐                       Total Other Funds187,367,629 ‐                   187,367,629 205,405,748     ‐                    205,405,748 285,633,247     ‐                    285,633,247 107,140,130  (53,310,287)  53,829,843   TOTAL ALL FUNDS 231,910,616 ‐                   231,910,616 330,966,969     ‐                    330,966,969 419,426,795     ‐                    419,426,795 143,450,790  (64,684,527)  78,766,263   AGENDA ITEM # o) ATTACHMENT C  JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND PAY RANGES  2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE  AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.50% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual e10 1030 Mayor (1)15,059 180,708 15,059 180,708 e09 1005 City Council President (2)(7)2,050 24,600 e09 1000 City Council Members (2)1,750 21,000 e08 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 12,057 144,684 12,665 151,980 e11 1020 Municipal Court Judge (6)15,051 180,614 15,051 180,614 Salary effective July 2020 - until updated Salary is 95% of District Court Judge Salary m53 1035 Chief Administrative Officer (3)13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 15,819 189,828 16,612 199,344 m52 13,307 159,684 13,980 167,760 14,694 176,328 15,438 185,256 16,209 194,508 m51 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 15,819 189,828 m50 12,665 151,980 13,307 159,684 13,980 167,760 14,694 176,328 15,438 185,256 m49 1400 City Attorney (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1102 Community Services Administrator (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1105 Community & Economic Development Administrato 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1101 Administrative Services Administrator (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1104 Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Administrator (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1103 Public Works Administrator (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m49 1201 Police Chief (3)12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 15,059 180,708 m48 12,057 144,684 12,665 151,980 13,307 159,684 13,980 167,760 14,694 176,328 m47 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 14,336 172,032 m46 1535 Police Deputy Chief (4)11,476 137,712 12,057 144,684 12,665 151,980 13,307 159,684 13,980 167,760 m45 1200 Deputy Public Affairs Administrator (3)11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 m45 1573 Deputy PW Administrator - Transportation (3)11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 m45 2302 Deputy Community Services Administrator(3)11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 13,641 163,692 m44 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 12,057 144,684 12,665 151,980 13,307 159,684 m43 10,656 127,872 11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 12,983 155,796 m42 1401 Sr Assistant City Attorney 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 12,057 144,684 12,665 151,980 m41 10,145 121,740 10,656 127,872 11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 12,360 148,320 m40 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 12,057 144,684 m39 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 10,656 127,872 11,197 134,364 11,764 141,168 m38 2011 City Clerk/Public Records Officer 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1403 Chief Prosecuting Attorney 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1500 Court Services Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1575 Development Services Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1501 Economic Development Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 2044 Emergency Management Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1207 Facilities Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1210 Fiscal Services Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1212 Information Technology Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1571 Maintenance Services Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 8084 Parks and Trails Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1208 Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E ELECTED OFFICIALS MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISORY (NON-UNION) AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.50% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E m38 1502 Planning Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 2031 Police Commander (5)9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1214 Recreation & Neighborhoods Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1570 Utility Systems Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m38 1572 Transportation Systems Director 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 11,476 137,712 m37 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 10,656 127,872 11,197 134,364 m36 2463 HR Labor Relations & Compensation Manager 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 10,925 131,100 m35 1402 Assistant City Attorney 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 10,656 127,872 m34 2460 Organizational Development Manager 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 10,397 124,764 m33 2072 Airport Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 5015 Budget & Accounting Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2074 Building Official 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 1578 Community Development & Housing Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2021 Current Planning Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2073 Development Engineering Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2411 Financial Services Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2020 Long Range Planning Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2174 Property & Technical Services Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2176 Transportation Design Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2075 Transportation Operations Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2177 Transportation Planning Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 2172 Utility Engineering Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m33 3072 Water Maintenance Manager 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 10,145 121,740 m32 4480 Capital Projects Manager 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 m32 1577 Economic Development Manager 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 m32 4470 Parks Planning Manager 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 m32 3083 Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 9,899 118,788 m31 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 9,657 115,884 m30 2418 Application Support Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 2273 Assistant Development Engineering Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 3073 Fleet Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 2407 GIS Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 2462 Human Resources Benefits Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 2033 Police Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 2409 Risk Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 3071 Street Maintenance Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 3176 Transportation Maintenance Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m30 3070 Waste Water/Special Operations Manager 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 9,422 113,064 m29 3084 Golf Course Manager 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 m29 1522 Human Services Manager 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 m29 1404 Prosecuting Attorney 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 m29 2087 Recreation & Neighborhoods Manager 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 9,194 110,328 m28 3086 Facilities Manager 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 m28 6031 Financial Operations Manager 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 m28 8010 Parks Maintenance Manager 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 m28 5254 Permit Services Manager 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 m28 1116 Tax & Licensing Manager 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 8,968 107,616 m27 2204 Census Program Manager 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 m27 3011 Enterprise Content Manager 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 m27 2578 Housing Programs Manager 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 8,747 104,964 m26 2202 Communications Manager 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 8,530 102,360 m25 2086 Head Golf Professional 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.50% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E m25 2562 Senior Benefits Analyst 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 m25 2563 Senior Employee Relations Analyst 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 m25 2410 Senior Finance Analyst 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 m25 2561 Senior Risk Analyst 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 m25 2479 Solid Waste Coordinator 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 8,325 99,900 m24 5112 Deputy City Clerk/Public Records Officer 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 8,122 97,464 m23 3562 Benefits Analyst 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 m23 3563 Employee Relations Analyst 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 m23 2080 Recreation Supervisor 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 m23 2461 Risk Analyst 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 7,925 95,100 m22 2404 Community Events Coordinator 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 m22 1510 Court Services Supervisor 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 m22 8007 Golf Course Supervisor 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 m22 2091 Museum Manager 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 7,732 92,784 m21 2218 Tax & Licensing Auditor, Senior 6,191 74,292 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 7,538 90,456 m20 6,040 72,480 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 7,361 88,332 m19 6150 City Council Liaison 5,895 70,740 6,191 74,292 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 m19 6103 Executive Assistant 5,895 70,740 6,191 74,292 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 7,180 86,160 m18 5,747 68,964 6,040 72,480 6,348 76,176 6,671 80,052 7,005 84,060 m17 5,610 67,320 5,895 70,740 6,191 74,292 6,501 78,012 6,834 82,008 n16 multiple Administrative Assistants (All Depts)5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 6,316 75,792 6,631 79,572 n16 5118 Finance Analyst III 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 6,316 75,792 6,631 79,572 n16 5416 Payroll Technician III 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 6,316 75,792 6,631 79,572 n16 2217 Tax & Licensing Auditor II 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 6,316 75,792 6,631 79,572 n15 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 6,162 73,944 6,477 77,724 n14 5,185 62,220 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 6,316 75,792 n13 5115 Finance Analyst II 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 6,162 73,944 n13 2662 Human Resources Specialist 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 6,162 73,944 n13 5316 Payroll Technician II 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 6,162 73,944 n13 2216 Tax & Licensing Auditor I 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 6,162 73,944 n12 4,938 59,256 5,185 62,220 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 6,007 72,084 n11 2488 Assistant Golf Professional 4,813 57,756 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 n11 5139 Human Resources Assistant 4,813 57,756 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 5,864 70,368 n10 5114 Finance Analyst I 4,698 56,376 4,938 59,256 5,185 62,220 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 n10 5216 Payroll Technician I 4,698 56,376 4,938 59,256 5,185 62,220 5,451 65,412 5,726 68,712 n09 6151 Administrative Secretary I EX 4,586 55,032 4,813 57,756 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 5,584 67,008 n08 4,471 53,652 4,698 56,376 4,938 59,256 5,185 62,220 5,451 65,412 n07 6144 Secretary II EX 4,363 52,356 4,586 55,032 4,813 57,756 5,057 60,684 5,309 63,708 n06 4,255 51,060 4,471 53,652 4,698 56,376 4,938 59,256 5,185 62,220 n05 4,152 49,824 4,363 52,356 4,586 55,032 4,813 57,756 5,057 60,684 n04 4,053 48,636 4,255 51,060 4,471 53,652 4,698 56,376 4,938 59,256 n03 3,958 47,496 4,152 49,824 4,363 52,356 4,586 55,032 4,813 57,756 NON-UNION (CLERICAL, OTHER) AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.50% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE NON-REPRESENTED Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E n02 3,861 46,332 4,053 48,636 4,255 51,060 4,471 53,652 4,698 56,376 n01 5138 Office Specialist 3,772 45,264 3,958 47,496 4,152 49,824 4,363 52,356 4,586 55,032 $6,262 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs (1)In addition to salary receives annual car allowance of $4800 or use of a city vehicle. (2) (3)Not eligible for Longevity/Education or Uniform Allowance (4)Not eligible for Longevity/Education or Uniform Allowance Eligible for 3% cash premium or 3% into deferred compensation per employee's discretion for passing physical fitness. (5)Receive Education/Longevity & Uniform Allowance based on Union Contract plus eligible for 3% deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (6)4 year term (7)Council president to be paid $300/month above council members salary. 2% Step a14E $125 per month NON-REPRESENTED LONGEVITY PAY as of 7/1/2020 Step a14, E = 3% Step a14E $188 per month 4% Step a14E $250 per month Council members salary set per Salary Commission effective 4/1/20. Council receives 2% of salary for deferred comp. If members are not participating in PERS, they receive an extra 1.4 % of salary for deferred compensation. The City contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account for Management and Non-Represented employees; except for CAO receives 7% per year. 5% Step a14E $313 per month 6% Step a14E $376 per month 7% Step a14E $438 per month AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.25% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 9,722 116,664 10,208 122,496 10,726 128,712 11,271 135,252 11,840 142,080 a39 9,502 114,024 9,974 119,688 10,463 125,556 10,995 131,940 11,552 138,624 - a38 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 10,208 122,496 10,726 128,712 11,271 135,252 a37 9,047 108,564 9,502 114,024 9,974 119,688 10,463 125,556 10,995 131,940 a36 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 10,208 122,496 10,726 128,712 a35 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 9,502 114,024 9,974 119,688 10,463 125,556 a34 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 10,208 122,496 a33 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 9,502 114,024 9,974 119,688 a32 2413 Network Systems Manager 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 a32 2428 Principal Civil Engineer 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 a32 2425 Utility/GIS Engineer 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 9,722 116,664 a31 2078 Assistant Airport Manager 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 9,502 114,024 a30 2512 Client Technology Sys & Support Supervis 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 9,259 111,108 a29 2475 Civil Engineer III 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 a29 2570 Program Development Coordinator II 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 a29 2451 Senior Systems Analyst 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 9,047 108,564 a28 2422 Senior Planner 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 a28 2480 Capital Project Coordinator 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 a28 2416 Senior Network Systems Specialist 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 8,818 105,816 a27 2452 Senior Business Systems Analyst 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 8,606 103,272 a26 2474 Civil Engineer II 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 a26 2417 Systems Analyst 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 a26 3473 Water Utilities Maintenance Supervisor 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 8,396 100,752 a25 2481 Facilities Coordinator 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 a25 3484 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 a25 2470 Program Development Coordinator I 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 a25 2170 Property Services Agent 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 a25 8179 Signal/Electronic Systems Supervisor 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 8,194 98,328 a24 2420 Database Technician 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a24 3450 Lead Building Inspector 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a24 3469 Lead Construction Inspector 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a24 2403 Senior Economic Development Specialist 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a24 2419 Network Systems Specialist 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a24 2476 Transportation Planner 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 7,996 95,952 a23 8475 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2429 Building Plan Reviewer 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2421 Business Systems Analyst 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2472 Engineering Specialist III 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2505 GIS Analyst II 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 8175 Pavement Management Technician 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2450 Plan Reviewer 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 2484 Property Services Specialist 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.25% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a23 8001 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 8002 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 7,794 93,528 a23 8000 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor a22 2473 Civil Engineer I 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 a22 2430 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 a22 5197 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 7,607 91,284 a21 2424 Associate Planner 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 3452 Building Inspector/Combination 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 3451 Building Inspector/Electrical 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 2200 Communications Specialist II 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 3472 Construction Inspector 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 8008 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 5130 Emergency Management Coordinator 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 3089 Facilities Supervisor 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 5111 GIS Analyst I 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 8006 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 3483 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician III 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 8004 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a21 8011 Water Meter Technician Services Supervi 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 7,423 89,076 a20 5013 Assistant Public Records Officer 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 a20 2079 Business Coordinator - Airport 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 a20 2402 Economic Development Specialist 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 a20 2487 Housing Repair Coordinator 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 a20 2489 Human Services Coordinator 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 7,240 86,880 a19 6128 Accounting Supervisor 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 2427 Code Compliance Inspector 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 7182 Electrical Technician 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 3453 Energy Plans Reviewer 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 2471 Engineering Specialist II 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 3485 HVAC Systems Technician 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 7172 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a19 8178 Water Utility Instr./SCADA Technician 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 7,064 84,768 a18 3456 Development Services Representative 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 a18 5195 Farmers Market Coordinator 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 a18 2015 Probation Officer 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 a18 2083 Recreation Program Coordinator 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 6,890 82,680 a17 2423 Assistant Planner 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 8374 Maintenance Buyer 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 5001 Paralegal 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 5012 Public Records Specialist 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 5213 Senior Service Desk Technician 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 3482 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician II 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 3470 Water Quality/Treatment Plant Operator 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a17 2203 Digital Media Specialist 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 6,723 80,676 a16 8284 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 a16 8074 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 a16 8080 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 a16 5194 Program Assistant 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 6,559 78,708 a15 6167 Court Operations Specialist 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 7181 Facilities Technician II 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 7184 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 8174 Lift Station Technician 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.25% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a15 5122 Planning Technician 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 5180 Senior Program Specialist 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 7170 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a15 3474 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 6,402 76,824 a14 5161 Asset Management Systems Technician 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 a14 5160 Recreation Systems Technician 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 6,247 74,964 a13 8474 Airport Operations Specialist 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 3471 Engineering Specialist I 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 7180 Facilities Technician I 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 3487 Housing Maintenance Technician 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 6263 Permit Services Specialist 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 7110 Print & Mail Supervisor 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 5179 Program Specialist 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 5214 Service Desk Technician 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a13 3481 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician I 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 6,091 73,092 a12 2201 Communications Specialist I 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a12 8283 Golf Course Maintenance Worker III 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a12 6166 Judicial Specialist II 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a12 8173 Maintenance Services Worker III 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a12 8083 Parks Maintenance Worker III 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a12 8573 Traffic Maintenance Worker II 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 5,942 71,304 a11 8473 Airport Maintenance Worker 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 5014 City Clerk Specialist 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 7173 Fleet Management Technician 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 8183 Lead Maintenance Custodian 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 6265 Payroll Analyst 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 5007 Public Records Specialist 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a11 2486 Recreation Specialist 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 5,795 69,540 a10 6164 Judicial Specialist/Trainer 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 a10 6165 Legal Assistant 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 a10 6263 Permit Technician 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 a10 6163 Probation Clerk 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 5,659 67,908 a09 6131 Accounting Assistant IV 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 a09 6151 Administrative Secretary I 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 a09 8286 Golf Course Operations Assistant 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 a09 8070 Mechanic's Assistant 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 a09 2085 Recreation Assistant 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 5,518 66,216 a08 8282 Golf Course Maintenance Worker II 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 7126 Housing Repair Technician 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 6162 Judicial Specialist I 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 6109 Lead Office Assistant 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 8172 Maintenance Services Worker II 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 8082 Parks Maintenance Worker II 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 8375 Purchasing Assistant 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a08 8572 Traffic Maintenance Worker I 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 5,389 64,668 a07 6132 Accounting Assistant III 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 a07 8184 Maintenance Custodian 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 a07 7112 Print & Mail Operator 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 a07 6142 Secretary II 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 a07 8110 Water Meter Technician 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 5,250 63,000 a06 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 5,126 61,512 AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.25% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a05 6134 Accounting Assistant II 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 a05 6130 Office Assistant III 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 a05 6141 Secretary I 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 4,999 59,988 a04 6160 Court Security Officer 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 8281 Golf Course Maintenance Worker I 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 8181 Lead Custodian 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 8171 Maintenance Services Worker I 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 8081 Parks Maintenance Worker I 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 6282 Pro Shop Assistant 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a04 8576 Solid Waste Maintenance Worker 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 4,881 58,572 a03 6136 Accounting Assistant I 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 a03 6120 Office Assistant II 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 a03 8079 Parks Maintenance Assistant II 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 a03 7111 Print & Mail Assistant 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 4,760 57,120 a02 3,821 45,852 4,008 48,096 4,213 50,556 4,420 53,040 4,644 55,728 a01 8182 Custodian 3,722 44,664 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 a01 6111 Office Assistant I 3,722 44,664 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 a01 7079 Parks Maintenance Assistant I 3,722 44,664 3,910 46,920 4,107 49,284 4,314 51,768 4,530 54,360 $6,247 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs The City contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14) 6% Step a14E $375 per month 7% Step a14E $437 per month 4% Step a14E $250 per month 5% Step a14E $312 per month 3% Step a14E $187 per month LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $125 per month AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.5% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual a40 9,746 116,952 #####122,796 10,752 129,024 11,298 135,576 11,868 142,416 a39 9,525 114,300 9,998 119,976 10,489 125,868 11,022 132,264 11,580 138,960 - a38 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 10,233 122,796 10,752 129,024 11,298 135,576 a37 9,069 108,828 9,525 114,300 9,998 119,976 10,489 125,868 11,022 132,264 a36 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 10,233 122,796 10,752 129,024 a35 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 9,525 114,300 9,998 119,976 10,489 125,868 a34 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 10,233 122,796 a33 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 9,525 114,300 9,998 119,976 a32 2413 Network Systems Manager 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 a32 2428 Principal Civil Engineer 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 a32 2425 Utility/GIS Engineer 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 9,746 116,952 a31 2078 Assistant Airport Manager 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 9,525 114,300 a30 2512 Client Technology Sys & Support Supervis 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 9,282 111,384 a29 2475 Civil Engineer III 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 a29 2570 Program Development Coordinator II 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 a29 2451 Senior Systems Analyst 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 9,069 108,828 a28 2422 Senior Planner 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 a28 2480 Capital Project Coordinator 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 a28 2416 Senior Network Systems Specialist 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 8,839 106,068 a27 2452 Senior Business Systems Analyst 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 8,627 103,524 a26 2474 Civil Engineer II 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 a26 2417 Systems Analyst 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 a26 3473 Water Utilities Maintenance Supervisor 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 8,417 101,004 a25 2481 Facilities Coordinator 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 a25 3484 Lead Electrical/Ctrl Systems Technician 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 a25 2470 Program Development Coordinator I 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 a25 2170 Property Services Agent 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 a25 8179 Signal/Electronic Systems Supervisor 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 8,214 98,568 a24 2420 Database Technician 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a24 3450 Lead Building Inspector 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a24 3469 Lead Construction Inspector 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a24 2403 Senior Economic Development Specialist 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a24 2419 Network Systems Specialist 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a24 2476 Transportation Planner 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 8,015 96,180 a23 8475 Airport Ops & Maintenance Supervisor 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2429 Building Plan Reviewer 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2421 Business Systems Analyst 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2472 Engineering Specialist III 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2505 GIS Analyst II 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 8175 Pavement Management Technician 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2450 Plan Reviewer 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 2484 Property Services Specialist 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective July 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.5% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective July 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a23 8001 Street Maintenance Services Supervisor 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 8002 Waste Water Maint. Services Supervisor 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 7,813 93,756 a23 8000 Water Maintenance Services Supervisor a22 2473 Civil Engineer I 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 a22 2430 Lead Code Compliance Inspector 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 a22 5197 Neighborhood Program Coordinator 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 7,626 91,512 a21 2424 Associate Planner 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 3452 Building Inspector/Combination 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 3451 Building Inspector/Electrical 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 2200 Communications Specialist II 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 3472 Construction Inspector 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 8008 Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 5130 Emergency Management Coordinator 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 3089 Facilities Supervisor 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 5111 GIS Analyst I 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 8006 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 3483 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician III 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 8004 Traffic Signage & Marking Supervisor 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a21 8011 Water Meter Technician Services Supervi 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 7,441 89,292 a20 5013 Assistant Public Records Officer 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 a20 2079 Business Coordinator - Airport 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 a20 2402 Economic Development Specialist 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 a20 2487 Housing Repair Coordinator 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 a20 2489 Human Services Coordinator 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 7,257 87,084 a19 6128 Accounting Supervisor 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 2427 Code Compliance Inspector 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 7182 Electrical Technician 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 3453 Energy Plans Reviewer 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 2471 Engineering Specialist II 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 3485 HVAC Systems Technician 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 7172 Lead Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a19 8178 Water Utility Instr./SCADA Technician 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 7,081 84,972 a18 3456 Development Services Representative 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 a18 5195 Farmers Market Coordinator 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 a18 2015 Probation Officer 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 a18 2083 Recreation Program Coordinator 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 6,907 82,884 a17 2423 Assistant Planner 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 8374 Maintenance Buyer 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 5001 Paralegal 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 5012 Public Records Specialist 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 5213 Senior Service Desk Technician 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 3482 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician II 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 3470 Water Quality/Treatment Plant Operator 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a17 2203 Digital Media Specialist 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 6,739 80,868 a16 8284 Lead Golf Course Maintenance Worker 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 a16 8074 Lead Maintenance Services Worker 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 a16 8080 Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 a16 5194 Program Assistant 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 6,575 78,900 a15 4014 City Clerk Specialist II 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 6167 Court Operations Specialist 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 7181 Facilities Technician II 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 7184 Grounds Equipment Mechanic 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.5% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective July 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a15 8174 Lift Station Technician 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 5122 Planning Technician 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 5180 Senior Program Specialist 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 8574 Senior Traffic Maintenance Worker 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 7170 Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a15 3474 Water Utility Maintenance Technician 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 6,417 77,004 a14 5161 Asset Management Systems Technician 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 a14 5160 Recreation Systems Technician 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 6,262 75,144 a13 8474 Airport Operations Specialist 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 3471 Engineering Specialist I 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 7180 Facilities Technician I 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 3487 Housing Maintenance Technician 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 6263 Permit Services Specialist 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 7110 Print & Mail Supervisor 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 5179 Program Specialist 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 5214 Service Desk Technician 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a13 3481 Signal/Electronics Systems Technician I 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 6,105 73,260 a12 2201 Communications Specialist I 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a12 8283 Golf Course Maintenance Worker III 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a12 6166 Judicial Specialist II 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a12 8173 Maintenance Services Worker III 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a12 8083 Parks Maintenance Worker III 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a12 8573 Traffic Maintenance Worker II 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 5,956 71,472 a11 8473 Airport Maintenance Worker 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 5014 City Clerk Specialist I 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 7173 Fleet Management Technician 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 8183 Lead Maintenance Custodian 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 6265 Payroll Analyst 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 5007 Public Records Specialist 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a11 2486 Recreation Specialist 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 5,809 69,708 a10 6164 Judicial Specialist/Trainer 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 a10 6165 Legal Assistant 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 a10 6263 Permit Technician 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 a10 6163 Probation Clerk 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 5,673 68,076 a09 6131 Accounting Assistant IV 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 a09 6151 Administrative Secretary I 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 a09 8286 Golf Course Operations Assistant 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 a09 8070 Mechanic's Assistant 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 a09 2085 Recreation Assistant 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 5,531 66,372 a08 8282 Golf Course Maintenance Worker II 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 7126 Housing Repair Technician 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 6162 Judicial Specialist I 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 6109 Lead Office Assistant 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 8172 Maintenance Services Worker II 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 8082 Parks Maintenance Worker II 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 8375 Purchasing Assistant 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a08 8572 Traffic Maintenance Worker I 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 5,402 64,824 a07 6132 Accounting Assistant III 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 a07 8184 Maintenance Custodian 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 a07 7112 Print & Mail Operator 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 a07 6142 Secretary II 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 a07 8110 Water Meter Technician 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 5,263 63,156 AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.5% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE AFSCME, Local 2170 Effective July 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E a06 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 5,139 61,668 a05 6134 Accounting Assistant II 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 a05 6130 Office Assistant III 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 a05 6141 Secretary I 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 5,011 60,132 a04 6160 Court Security Officer 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 8281 Golf Course Maintenance Worker I 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 8181 Lead Custodian 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 8171 Maintenance Services Worker I 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 8081 Parks Maintenance Worker I 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 6282 Pro Shop Assistant 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a04 8576 Solid Waste Maintenance Worker 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 4,892 58,704 a03 6136 Accounting Assistant I 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 a03 6120 Office Assistant II 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 a03 8079 Parks Maintenance Assistant II 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 a03 7111 Print & Mail Assistant 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 4,771 57,252 a02 3,831 45,972 4,018 48,216 4,223 50,676 4,431 53,172 4,655 55,860 a01 8182 Custodian 3,731 44,772 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 a01 Golf Course Associate 3,731 44,772 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 a01 6111 Office Assistant I 3,731 44,772 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 a01 7079 Parks Maintenance Assistant I 3,731 44,772 3,920 47,040 4,117 49,404 4,324 51,888 4,541 54,492 $6,262 Completion of 5 Yrs Completion of 10 Yrs Completion of 15 Yrs Completion of 20 Yrs Completion of 25 Yrs Completion of 30 Yrs The City contributes 4% of employee's base wage per year to a deferred compensation account. (Article 14) 6% Step a14E $376 per month 7% Step a14E $438 per month 4% Step a14E $250 per month 5% Step a14E $313 per month 3% Step a14E $188 per month LONGEVITY PAY Step a14, E = 2% Step a14E $125 per month AGENDA ITEM # o) COLA 3.50% Grade Code Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Police Chief See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m49 Police Deputy Chief See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m46 Police Commander See Management & Supervisory Matrix, Grade m38 pc61 3035 Sergeant*9,384 112,609 9,853 118,240 (15% over Police Officer)*Step increase at 24 months pc60 4131 Patrol Officer II 6,097 73,165 6,614 79,363 7,134 85,613 7,646 91,747 8,161 97,932 pc59 4130 Patrol Officer I 5,738 68,861 6,225 74,699 6,715 80,575 7,196 86,347 7,681 92,172 2 Percent Interpreters ------------------------3% Detectives --------------------------4% Traffic Assignment----------------4% Motorcycle Assignment------------- 2% Canine Officer ---------------------3% Corporal Assignment ------------7.5% Field Training Officer ------------4% Training Officer--------------------4% SWAT Assignment ----------------4% SRO Assignment-------------------4% Civil Disturbance Unit -----------Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs minimum when called to emergency. Crisis Communication Unit------Paid at rate of double time with 3 hrs minimum when called to emergency. Percentage (of base wage) Percentage (of base wage) - - - - - Patrol Officer II: Effective 1-1-18 Patrol Officer II and Sergeant had 6.25% added to their base pay to reflect the additional 109 hours worked in a calendar year. This is reflected in the ranges above. Effective January 1, 2008, Sergeants assigned to Investigation and Traffic Unit will not receive the 3% premium if they have been in the position of Sergeant for 24 months. NOTE: Please refer to the current labor agreement for specific information. AA Degree (90 credits)4% BA Degree/Masters Degree 6% The City contributes 2.0% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation. (Appendix A.2.3) The City will contribute 3.0% of employee's wage base toward deferred compensation for passing physical fitness. (Article 6.8.4, and Appendix A.2.4) Beginning 1-1-2020 the City will contribute 1% of employee's wage base to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.11) Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY (Appendix B) Position Title HAZARD DUTY AND PREMIUM PAY (Article 6.7 and 6.8) MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY (Appendix B) Years of Service Completion of 5 Yrs 2% 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Commissioned Officers Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E AGENDA ITEM # o) CITY OF RENTON H:\5 - Human Resources\4 - Compensation\1- Salary Table\2020 Salary Index 7-20-20\Police Non-Comm 2020 Salary Index 7-20-20 Page 14 of 15 COLA 3.25% Grade Code Position Title Monthly Annual Monthly Annual pn58 6178 Police Service Specialist Supv 6,454 77,442 6,776 81,314 Step A(15% above Specialist, Step E)* step increase at 24 months Step E (5% above Supervisor, Step A) pn57 6182 Police Service Specialist Lead 6,032 72,390 6,032 72,390 (7.5% above Specialist, Step E) pn54 4138 Police Community Prgm Coord 4,993 59,916 5,396 64,752 5,928 71,136 6,390 76,680 6,710 80,520 pn54 4120 Crime Analyst 4,993 59,916 5,396 64,752 5,928 71,136 6,390 76,680 6,710 80,520 pn56 4133 Electronic Home Detention Coord 4,926 59,112 5,316 63,792 5,854 70,248 6,436 77,232 6,756 81,072 pn53 3432 Evidence Technician 4,700 56,400 5,073 60,876 5,583 66,996 6,142 73,704 6,458 77,496 pn61 4121 Domestic Violence Victim Advocate 4,661 55,932 5,063 60,756 5,627 67,524 6,186 74,232 6,513 78,156 pn60 4,445 53,340 4,828 57,936 5,364 64,368 5,898 70,776 6,205 74,460 pn52 4135 Animal Control Officer 4,433 53,196 4,793 57,516 5,270 63,240 5,795 69,540 6,086 73,032 pn62 6181 Police Service Specialist 4,088 49,056 4,416 52,992 4,860 58,320 5,346 64,152 5,612 67,344 pn51 6183 Police Secretary 3,829 45,948 4,133 49,596 4,550 54,600 5,008 60,096 5,254 63,048 pn51 4137 Parking Enforcement Officer 3,829 45,948 4,133 49,596 4,550 54,600 5,008 60,096 5,254 63,048 Interpreter Premium………………………………..………………….…………….3% of base pay (Article 6.5.2) 2.5% of base pay (Article 6.5.3) 4% of base pay (Article 6.5.1) Double time with 3 hrs min (Article 6.4) - Beginning 1/1/2020 the City will contribute 1% of the employee's base wage to a VEBA plan. (Article 14.10) - The City will contribute an additional 3.0% of employee's wage base toward deferred comp for passing physical fitness prior to beginning of each calendar year. (Article 6.8.3) Completion of 25 Yrs 12% Completion of 30 Yrs 14% MONTHLY EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Appendix B.2) Percentage (of base wage) AA Degree (90 credits)4% BA/BS Degree or Masters Degree 6% - The City contributes 4.5% of the employee's base wage to a deferred comp account. (Appendix A.3) Completion of 10 Yrs 4% Completion of 15 Yrs 6% Completion of 20 Yrs 10% Completion of 5 Yrs 2% NON- COMMISSIONED PREMIUM PAY (Articles 6.4 and 6.5) Public Records Act Premium…………………………………………………………… Field Training Officer, FTO (Police Service Specialist)…………........… Crisis Communication Unit………………………………………..…...……… POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED- MONTHLY LONGEVITY INCENTIVE PAY SCHEDULE (Article 12, Appendix B.1) Years of Service Percentage (of base wage) 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE POLICE DEPARTMENT - Non-Commissioned Officers Effective January 1, 2020 STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E AGENDA ITEM # o) Grade STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E h06 13.50 h07 13.75 14.00 14.25 14.50 14.75 h08 15.00 15.25 15.50 15.75 16.00 h09 16.25 16.50 16.75 17.00 17.25 h10 17.50 17.75 18.00 18.25 18.50 h11 18.75 19.00 19.25 19.50 19.75 h12 20.00 20.50 21.00 21.50 22.00 h13 22.50 23.00 23.50 24.00 24.50 h14 25.00 25.50 26.00 26.50 27.00 h15 27.50 28.00 28.50 29.00 29.50 h16 30.00 30.50 31.00 31.50 32.00 h17 32.50 33.00 33.50 34.00 34.50 h18 35.00 35.50 36.00 36.50 37.00 h19 37.50 38.00 38.50 39.00 39.50 h20 40.00 40.50 41.00 41.50 42.00 h21 42.25 42.50 42.75 43.00 43.25 h22 43.50 43.75 44.00 44.25 44.50 h23 45.00 45.50 46.00 46.50 47.00 h24 47.50 48.00 48.50 49.00 49.50 h25 50.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 54.00 h26 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 h27 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 h28 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 2020 CITY OF RENTON SALARY TABLE SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE WAGE TABLE AGENDA ITEM # o)