HomeMy WebLinkAbout0895.06 DFR 226.pdfEarth Solutions NW, LLC
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
15365 NE 90th Street, Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052
(425) 449-4704 FAX (425) 449-4711
To: RJ Development
401 Central Street SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Date: October 1, 2020
ESNW No.: ES- 895.06
Project: Weatherly Inn
Attn: Mr. Duane Meyer
Email: duane@accrete.build
No. of
Copies Date Description
1 9/4/20 Daily Field Report(s) # 226
Comments:
CC:
1: John Wilson ATTN: johnw@rinocon.com
2: Mark Richardson ATTN: mark@accrete.build
3: Jeff Bennett ATTN: jeffb@accrete.build
4: Jennifer Vogele ATTN: jennifer@accrete.build
5: Jonathan Chavez ATTN: jchavez@rentonwa.gov
6: Joe W ATTN: joew@accrete.build
7: Roxanne Caballero ATTN: roxanne@accrete.build
Transmitted By: Earth Solutions NW, LLC
PM: Scott Riegel, L.G., L.E.G.
Earth Solutions NWLLC
15365 NE 90th Street, Suite 100
Redmond, WA 98052
Main (425) 449-4704 | Fax (425) 449-4711
www.esnw.com DAILY FIELD REPORT
ESNW Rep. Project No. Page Report No.
TSH 0895.06 1 of 1 226
Time On Site Time Off Site Date Day of Week
2:35 2:55 9/4/2020 Thursday
Travel Time Weather
1.0RT 50ºF, Partly Cloudy
Project Name Job Location Client/Owner
Weatherly Inn 4500 Talbot Road S, Renton RJ Development
Contractor #1 Contact Field Supervisor Reviewed
Rino Construction LAC
Contractor #2 Contact Project Manager Reviewed
SSR
Are approved plans/permits on site? Yes Project No. Permit No.
At the client’s request, ESNW rep was onsite to observe and test compaction of ultra-block wall backfill within the
Weatherly Inn development. While onsite the following was observed:
Ultra-Block Wall Backfill Compaction Testing:
ESNW rep was informed by the contractor that a small ultra-block wall had been installed and completely
backfilled within the central area of the Weatherly Inn development (pictured). ESNW rep arrived onsite and
observed that the contractor was not onsite, and that the ultra-block wall had been backfilled to approximate top
of wall. ESNW rep observed that the contractor had utilized onsite native unweathered grey glacial tills
compacted via jumping jack compactor. However, ESNW
rep observed that due to the over-optimum moisture
content of the wall backfill material (14-15%), the
contractor did not achieve minimum compaction
requirements of 95% or greater in the areas tested, and
that re-compaction of the wall backfill would be
required.
ESNW rep will return at the request of the client.
Trevor Healy, G.I.T.
Senior Field Technician
(206)-498-9751