Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRS_Arborist_Report_210128_V1 Greenforest Incorporated C o n s u l t i n g A r b o r i s t 4547 South Lucile Street, Seattle, WA 98118 Tel. 206-723-0656 TO: Norm and Cynthia Green 105 Harpeth Hills Drive Franklin TN 37069 REFERENCE: Arborist Report SITE ADDRESS: 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA DATE: January 9, 20189 PREPARED BY: Favero Greenforest, ISA Certified Arborist # PN -0143A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #379 Contents • Introduction • Summary • Limitations and Use of Report • Tree Identification Scheme • Tree Species and Size • Reasons For any Tree Removal • Tree Health, Condition, and Viability • Limits of Disturbance • Replacement Trees • Tree Retention Priority Criteria • Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations • Attachments INTRODUCTION You contacted me and contracted my services as a consulting arborist. My assignment is to tag and inspect trees at the above referenced site. The purpose of this report is to establish the condition of the significant trees to satisfy City of Renton permit submittal requirements. I visited the site 6/23/2017 and visually inspected the regulated trees on site, which are the subject of this report. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 2 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist The parcel is currently single-family and includes a residence with a large attached garage/shop, a large freestanding carport and three outbuildings. This report identifies and establishes the condition of 74 existing significant trees at the project site. Of those, 23 are unhealthy and/or located in proposed rights-of-way / access tracts, leaving 51 on-site significant trees. SUMMARY The following table summarizes the tree quantities and categories inventoried in this report. Significant, Heritage, Landmark and Dangerous categories are defined by municipal code. Onsite Significant Trees 39 Onsite Landmark Trees 12 Total Onsite Sig. & Land. Trees 51 Onsite Dangerous Trees /Right-of-Way Trees 23 PROPOSED RETAINED TREES 12 PROPOSED RETAINED PERCENTAGE 24% LIMITATIONS AND USE OF THIS REPORT This tree report establishes, via the most practical means available, the existing conditions of the trees on the subject property. Ratings for health and structure, as well as any recommendations are valid only through the development and construction process. This report is based solely on what is readily visible and observable, without any invasive means. There are several conditions that can affect a tree’s condition that may be pre-existing and unable to be ascertained with a visual-only analysis. No attempt was made to determine the presence of hidden or concealed conditions which may contribute to the risk or failure potential of trees on the site. These conditions include root and stem (trunk) rot, internal cracks, structural defects or construction damage to roots, which may be hidden beneath the soil. Additionally, construction and post-construction circumstances can cause a relatively rapid deterioration of a tree’s condition. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 3 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist TREE IDENTIFICATION SCHEME I marked each tree with 1” x 3.5” aluminum tag indicating tree number as listed on the attached inventory, and as shown on the attached exhibit. SPECIES AND SIZE OF EACH TREE I measured the trunk diameter (54” from grade) of each tree, and identified each tree by common name. REASON(S) FOR TREE REMOVAL I rated the health structure of each tree (see attached inventory). Trees with significant visible problems or defects are indicated as Dangerous and are not viable for retention. Removal is recommended for 7 unhealthy (Dangerous) trees, and 42 onsite trees because of proposed site improvements. (See attachment 3.) TREE INSPECTION METHOD – TREE HEALTH, CONDITION AND VIABILITY I visually inspected each tree from the ground. I performed a Level 1 risk assessment.1 This is the standard assessment for populations of trees near specified targets, conducted in order to identify obvious defects or specified conditions such as a pre-development inventory. This is a limited visual assessment focuses on identifying trees with imminent and/or probable likelihood of failure, and/or other visible conditions that will affect tree retention. I recorded tree species and size (DBH). I estimated the average dripline of each tree. I rated the condition of each tree, both health and structure. A tree’s structure is distinct from its health. This inspection identifies what is visible with both. High-risk trees can appear healthy in that they can have a dense, green canopy. This may occur when there is sufficient sapwood or adventitious roots present to maintain tree health, but inadequate strength for structural support. Conversely, trees in poor health may or may not be structurally stable. For example, tree decline due to root disease is likely to cause the tree to be structurally unstable, while decline due to drought or insect attack may not. 1 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 9: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Management – Standard Practices, Tree Risk Assessment. 2011. ISA. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 4 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist One way that tree health and structure are linked is that healthy trees are more capable of compensating for structural defects. A healthy tree can develop adaptive growth that adds strength to parts weakened by decay, cracks, and wounds. This report identifies unhealthy trees based on existing health conditions and tree structure, and specifies which trees are most suitable for preservation.2 No invasive procedures were performed on any trees. The results of this inspection are based on what was visible at the time of the inspection. The attached inventory summarizes my inspection results and provides the following information for each tree: Location – indicates if tree is onsite (OS), within a private access Tract (AC), or within the right-of-way (ROW). Retain or Remove Tree – identifies trees proposed for retention, and indicates trees to be removed for site improvements (SI) or if tree is unhealthy or Dangerous (UH). Tree Category as defined by municipal code. (TREE: A woody perennial usually having one dominant trunk, or, for certain species, a multi-stemmed trunk system, with a potential minimum height of ten feet (10') at maturity. Any trees listed on the Complete King County Weed List shall not qualify as a tree.) Dangerous: Any tree that has been certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist. Landmark: A tree with a caliper of thirty inches (30") or greater. (Average multiple stems and report single integer) Significant: A tree with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8"). Trees qualified as dangerous shall not be considered significant. There are no trees on the site planted within the most recent ten (10) years. Tree number as shown on tag in the field, and on attached exhibit. DBH Stem diameter in inches measured 4.5 feet from the ground. 2 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 5: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Maintenance – Standard Practices, Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 5 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Tree Species Common name. Dripline Average branch extension from the trunk as radius in feet. Health and Structure ratings ‘1’ indicates no visible health-related problems or structural defects, ‘2’ indicates minor visible problems or defects that may require attention if the tree is retained, and ‘3’ indicates significant visible problems or defects and tree (is categorized as Dangerous and) removal is recommended. Visible defects Obvious structural defects or diseases visible at time of inspection, which includes: Asymmetric canopy– the tree has an asymmetric canopy from space and light competition from adjacent trees. Deadwood – Large and/or multiple dead branches throughout canopy. Decay – process of wood degradation by microorganisms resulting in weak and defective structure. Diseased – foliage and trunk/stems are diseased. Dogleg in trunk – trunk with a bow or defective bend (90°) in trunk often half way of further up the trunk. Double leader – the tree has multiple stem attachments, which may require maintenance or monitoring over time. Foliar disease - Foliage is diseased with manageable fungus. Multiple leaders - the tree has multiple stem attachments, which may lead to tree failure and require maintenance or monitoring over time. Previous failure – Tree trunk previously broken and defective. Sweep in trunk – characterized by a leaning lower trunk and a more upright top. Stumpsprout- Tree previously cut at grade with multiple stems and potentially weak attachments. Suppressed – tree crowded by larger adjacent trees, with defective structure and/or low vigor. Retain tree only as a grove tree, not stand-alone. Trunk decay - Wood decay is visible in the trunk. Viability - a determination by the arborist whether the tree is viable for retention. Retention Priority Criteria – indicates if tree is Landmark, >60’ tall, part of a continuous canopy, >18” DBH, or is non-native. Type indicates if tree is Deciduous (D) or Evergreen (E). Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 6 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Limits of Disturbance (LOD) are calculated for all the retained significant trees (and for trees on adjoining parcels with overhanging driplines). They are listed below as radii in feet from the trunk for the side of the tree to be impacted by construction. They are determined using rootplate 3 and trunk diameter,4,5 and ISA Best Management Practices.6 These are the minimum distances from the trees for any soil disturbance, and represent the area to be protected during construction. These LOD are malleable and may be adjusted during the design and construction process. The following table lists the limits of disturbance of each tree. Limits of Disturbance in feet as radius from tree trunk. Limits of Disturbance Tree No. DBH Tree Species DL North East South West 4 37” Douglas-fir 21’ DL DL DL PL 10 13” Bigleaf maple 16’ PL PL DL DL 11 27” Douglas-fir 16’ PL PL DL DL 14 21” Douglas-fir 16’ PL DL DL PL 15 25” Douglas-fir 16’ PL DL DL PL 16 35” Western red-cedar 18’ DL DL DL PL 25 11” Black pine 10’ PL DL DL DL 26 19” Western red-cedar 14’ PL DL DL DL 27 36” Western red-cedar 17’ DL DL DL DL 57 30” Western red-cedar 17’ DL DL PL DL 58 24” Western red-cedar 17’ DL DL PL DL 59 15” Western red-cedar 15’ DL DL PL DL (PL=property line, DL = dripline) REPLACEMENT TREES Replacement evergreen (coniferous) trees shall be 6-8 feet tall, each with a single, straight trunk without defect or deformity. Each tree shall have even branch distribution around and along the trunk’s axis, with a minimum 90% live crown ratio (LCR-percent of trunk with foliage-bearing branches). 3 Coder, Kim D. 2005. Tree Biomechanics Series. University of Georgia School of Forest Resources. 4 Smiley, E. Thomas, Ph. D. Assessing the Failure Potential of Tree Roots, Shade Tree Technical Report. Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. 5 Fite, Kelby and E. Thomas Smiley. 2009. Managing Trees During construction; Part Two. Arborist News. ISA. 6 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Series, Part 5: Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 7 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Deciduous trees shall be minimum 2” caliper, a trunk free from defect or injury, even and uniform branch distribution, and a LCR of 30% or greater. All replacement trees shall have foliage that is normal in color and density (if present), and shoot growth and terminal buds evident of good tree vitality. Tree planting activities shall comply with ANSI A-300 Part 6:Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Maintenance – Standard Practice (Transplanting). And shall follow ISAs Best Management Practices – Tree Planting (2005). Rootballs shall be set on undisturbed or packed soil to prevent sinking, and the rootcrowns shall be exposed prior to planting and set level with finished grade. All wires, cords and burlap shall be removed at planting. If staking is required to keep the tree upright during establishment, all cores, stakes and wires shall be removed after one year. Replacement tree selection shall comply with RMC §4-4-130.H.1.e.(ii) which prohibits all Populus, Alnus, Salix and Platanus species. TREE RETENTION PRIORITY CRITERIA Trees are indicated according to Priority One criteria as provided in RMC §4-4-130H.1.b. in the attached inventory. TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS from RMC. §4.4.130 H.9. Protection Measures During Construction: Protection measures in this subsection shall apply for all trees that are to be retained. All of the following tree protection measures shall apply: a. Construction Storage Prohibited: The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. b. Fenced Protection Area Required: Prior to development activities, the applicant shall erect and maintain six-foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees or at a distance surrounding the tree equal to one and one-quarter feet (1.25') for every one inch (1") of trunk caliper, whichever is greater, or along the perimeter of a tree protection tract. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, “NO TRESPASSING – Protected Trees,” or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 8 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. c. Protection from Grade Changes: If the grade level adjoining to a tree to be retained is to be raised, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be equal to the tree’s drip line. d. Impervious Surfaces Prohibited within the Drip Line: The applicant may not install impervious surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. e. Restrictions on Grading within the Drip Lines of Retained Trees: The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be lowered within the greater of the following areas: (i) the area defined by the drip line of the tree, or (ii) an area around the tree equal to one and one-half feet (1-1/2') in diameter for each one inch (1") of tree caliper. A larger tree protection zone based on tree size, species, soil, or other conditions may be required. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) f. Mulch Layer Required: All areas within the required fencing shall be covered completely and evenly with a minimum of three inches (3") of bark mulch prior to installation of the protective fencing. Exceptions may be approved if the mulch will adversely affect protected ground cover plants. (Ord. 5676, 12-3- 2012) g. Monitoring Required during Construction: The applicant shall retain a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect to ensure trees are protected from development activities and/or to prune branches and roots, fertilize, and water as appropriate for any trees and ground cover that are to be retained. h. Alternative Protection: Alternative safeguards may be used if determined to provide equal or greater tree protection. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) Attachments: 1. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 2. Certification of Performance 3. Significant Tree Inventory 4. Tree Retention Plan Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 9 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Attachment No. 1 - Assumptions & Limiting Conditions 1. A field examination of the site was made 6/23/2017. My observations and conclusions are as of that date. 2. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant/arborist can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 3. I am not a qualified land surveyor. Reasonable care was used to match the trees indicated on the sheets with those growing in the field. 4. Construction activities can significantly affect the condition of retained trees. All retained trees should be inspected after construction is completed, and then inspected regularly as part of routine maintenance. 5. Unless stated other wise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those trees that were examined and reflects the condition of those trees at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of the subject trees without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied that problems or deficiencies of the subject tree may not arise in the future. 6. All trees possess the risk of failure. Trees can fail at any time, with or without obvious defects, and with or without applied stress. A complete evaluation of the potential for this (a) tree to fail requires excavation and examination of the base of the subject tree. 7. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made. 8. The consultant does not assume any liability for the subject tree and does not represent the transfer of such for any risks associated with the tree from the landowner to the consultant. Risk management is solely the responsibility of the landowner. Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 10 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Attachment No. 2 - Certification of Performance I, Favero Greenforest, certify that: • I have personally inspected the trees and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinion, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis, opinion, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client of any other party nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), and the ISA PNW Chapter, I am an ISA Certified Arborist (#PN-0143A) and am Tree Risk Assessment Qualified, and am a Registered Consulting Arborist® (#379) with American Society of Consulting Arborists. I have worked as an independent consulting arborist since 1989. Signed: GREENFOREST, Inc. By Favero Greenforest, M. S. Date: January 9, 2018 Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 11 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Attachment No. 3 – Significant Tree Inventory Location Retain Remove Tree Category Tree No. Tree Size DBH Species Dripline Health Structure Visible Defects Viable Tree Landmark > 60' tall Continuous Canopy > 18" DBH Native Tree Type ROW X Landmark 1 41” Western red-cedar 17’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 2 13” Giant sequoia 7’ 1 1 E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 3 60” Bigleaf maple 25’ 3 3 Kretzschmaria fungus infection NO X D OS X Landmark 4 37” Douglas-fir 21’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 5 39” Douglas-fir 20’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 6 24” Western red-cedar 15’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 7 18” Western red-cedar 15’ 1 2 Asymmetric canopy X X X E AC Yes: SI Significant 8 23” Western red-cedar 14’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 9 30” Douglas-fir 19’ 1 1 X X X X X E OS X Significant 10 13” Bigleaf maple 16’ 1 1 X X X D OS X Significant 11 27” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 12 20” Douglas-fir 15’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 13 6,6,8, 8,8,8” Bigleaf maple 14’ 3 3 Decline, stumpsprout NO X D OS X Significant 14 21” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 1 X X X X E OS X Significant 15 25” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X E OS X Landmark 16 35” Western red-cedar 18’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 17 13” Western red-cedar 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 18 17” Western red-cedar 14’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 19 12” Western red-cedar 11’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 12 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Location Retain Remove Tree Category Tree No. Tree Size DBH Species Dripline Health Structure Visible Defects Viable Tree Landmark > 60' tall Continuous Canopy > 18" DBH Native Tree Type OS Yes: SI Significant 20 9” Western hemlock 6’ 2 2 Suppressed, asymmetric X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 21 13” Western red-cedar 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 22 12” Western red-cedar 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 23 36” Western red-cedar 15’ 1 1 X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 24 30” Douglas-fir 21’ 1 1 X X X X X E OS X Significant 25 11” Black pine 10’ 1 1 X E OS X Significant 26 19” Western red-cedar 14’ 1 1 X X X X E OS X Landmark 27 36” Western red-cedar 17’ 1 1 X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 28 23” Western red-cedar 16’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 29 43” Douglas-fir 22’ 1 2 Deadwood, hangers, multiple leader, previous failure X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 30 23” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 31 19” Douglas-fir 15’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 32 10” Western red-cedar 11’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 33 18” Western red-cedar 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 34 31” Bigleaf maple 25’ 2 3 Deadwood, previous failure, decay NO X D OS Yes: SI Significant 35 14” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 36 35” Bigleaf maple 25’ 2 3 decline, deadwood, decay NO X D OS Yes: SI Significant 37 11” Western red-cedar 10’ 2 1 Suppressed X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 38 9” Douglas-fir 8’ 2 1 Suppressed X X E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 39 6” Douglas-fir 6’ 3 2 Suppressed NO X E Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 13 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Location Retain Remove Tree Category Tree No. Tree Size DBH Species Dripline Health Structure Visible Defects Viable Tree Landmark > 60' tall Continuous Canopy > 18" DBH Native Tree Type OS Yes: UH Dangerous 40 6” Douglas-fir 6’ 3 2 Suppressed NO X E OS Yes: SI Significant 41 17” Douglas-fir 14’ 1 1 X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 42 25” Douglas-fir 17’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 43 13” Douglas-fir 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 44 23” Douglas-fir 17’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 45 17,25” Douglas-fir 18’ 1 2 Asymmetric, double leader X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 46 22” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 1 X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 47 11” Douglas-fir 12’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 48 16” Douglas-fir 15’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 49 29” Bigleaf maple 22’ 1 2 Deadwood, double leader X X X X D OS Yes: SI Significant 50 20” Douglas-fir 16’ 1 2 Sweep X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 51 26” Western red-cedar 15’ 1 2 Multiple leaders X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 52 38” Douglas-fir 18’ 1 2 Asymmetric, dogleg, multiple leader X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 53 33” Douglas-fir 18’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X X E OS Yes: SI Significant 54 8” Western red-cedar 11’ 1 1 X X E OS Yes: SI Landmark 55 38” Douglas-fir 22’ 1 1 X X X X X E OS Yes: UH Dangerous 56 9” Western red-cedar 14’ 3 3 Diseased, decay, decline NO X E OS X Landmark 57 30” Western red-cedar 17’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X X E OS X Significant 58 24” Western red-cedar 17’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X X X E OS X Significant 59 15” Western red-cedar 15’ 1 2 Asymmetric X X E OS X Significant 60 9” Apple 13’ 2 2 Disease, mal-pruned D Norm and Cynthia Green RE: Arborist Report, 5008 NE 2nd Street, Renton WA January 9, 2018 Page 14 of 15 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Location Retain Remove Tree Category Tree No. Tree Size DBH Species Dripline Health Structure Visible Defects Viable Tree Landmark > 60' tall Continuous Canopy > 18" DBH Native Tree Type ROW X Significant 61 10” Western red-cedar 10’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 62 7” Western red-cedar 8’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 63 7” Western red-cedar 8’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 64 8” Western red-cedar 9’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 65 8” Western red-cedar 10’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 66 7” Western red-cedar 9’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 67 7” Western red-cedar 9’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Significant 68 9” Western red-cedar 10’ 1 1 X X E ROW X Landmark 69 40” Douglas-fir 22’ 1 2 Deadwood, hangers X X X X X E ROW X Dangerous 70 6” Autumnalis cherry 7’ 3 1 Disease, deadwood NO D ROW X Significant 71 6” Western hemlock 6’ 2 1 Suppressed X X E ROW X Landmark 72 31” Douglas-fir 17’ 1 2 Sweep X X X X X E ROW X Landmark 73 31” Douglas-fir 20’ 1 2 Trunk injury X X X X X E ROW X Significant 74 9” Black cottonwood 10’ 1 2 Suppressed X X D See text page 4 for abbreviations. LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 6 LOT 3 TRACT B LOT 5 LOT 4 TRACT A Tree No.Species DBH DL To Remove To Remain 1 (LM) (RW)Western red-cedar 41 17 X 2 Giant sequoia 13 7 X 3 (UH)Bigleaf maple 60 25 X 4 (LM)Douglas-fir 37 21 X 5 (LM)Douglas-fir 39 20 X 6 Western red-cedar 24 15 X 7 Western red-cedar 18 15 X 8 (AC)Western red-cedar 23 14 X 9 (LM)Douglas-fir 30 19 X 10 Bigleaf maple 13 16 X 11 Douglas-fir 27 16 X 12 Douglas-fir 20 15 X 13 (UH)Bigleaf maple 6,6,8,8,8,8 14 X 14 Douglas-fir 21 16 X 15 Douglas-fir 25 16 X 16 (LM)Western red-cedar 35 18 X 17 Western red-cedar 13 12 X 18 Western red-cedar 17 14 X 19 Western red-cedar 12 11 X 20 Western hemlock 9 6 X 21 Western red-cedar 13 12 X 22 Western red-cedar 12 12 X 23 (LM)Western red-cedar 36 15 X 24 (LM)Douglas-fir 30 21 X 25 Black pine 11 10 X Tree No.Species DBH DL To Remove To Remain 26 Western red-cedar 19 14 X 27 (LM)Western red-cedar 36 17 X 28 Western red-cedar 23 16 X 29 (LM)Douglas-fir 43 22 X 30 Douglas-fir 23 16 X 31 Douglas-fir 19 15 X 32 Western red-cedar 10 11 X 33 Western red-cedar 18 12 X 34 (UH)Bigleaf maple 31 25 X 35 Douglas-fir 14 16 X 36 (UH)Bigleaf maple 35 25 X 37 Western red-cedar 11 10 X 38 Douglas-fir 9 8 X 39 (UH)Douglas-fir 6 6 X 40 (UH)Douglas-fir 6 6 X 41 Douglas-fir 17 14 X 42 Douglas-fir 25 17 X 43 Douglas-fir 13 12 X 44 Douglas-fir 23 17 X 45 Douglas-fir 17,25 18 X 46 Douglas-fir 22 16 X 47 Douglas-fir 11 12 X 48 Douglas-fir 16 15 X 49 Bigleaf maple 29 22 X 50 Douglas-fir 20 16 X Tree No.Species DBH DL To Remove To Remain 51 Western red-cedar 26 15 X 52 (LM)Douglas-fir 38 18 X 53 (LM)Douglas-fir 33 18 X 54 Western red-cedar 8 11 X 55 (LM)Douglas-fir 38 22 X 56 (UH)Western red-cedar 9 14 X 57 (LM)Western red-cedar 30 17 X 58 Western red-cedar 24 17 X 59 Western red-cedar 15 15 X 60 Apple 9 13 X 61 (RW)Western red-cedar 10 10 X 62 (RW)Western red-cedar 7 8 X 63 (RW)Western red-cedar 7 8 X 64 (RW)Western red-cedar 8 9 X 65 (RW)Western red-cedar 8 10 X 66 (RW)Western red-cedar 7 9 X 67 (RW)Western red-cedar 7 9 X 68 (RW)Western red-cedar 9 10 X 69 (LM) (RW)Douglas-fir 40 22 X 70 (UH) (RW)Autumnalis cherry 6 7 X 71 (RW)Western hemlock 6 6 X 72 (LM) (RW)Douglas-fir 31 17 X 73 (LM) (RW)Douglas-fir 31 20 X 74 (RW)Black cottonwood 9 10 X Tree No.Species North East South West DL 4 (LM)Douglas-fir DL PL DL DL 21 10 Bigleaf maple PL DL DL DL 16 11 Douglas-fir PL DL DL DL 16 14 Douglas-fir PL DL DL DL 16 15 Douglas-fir DL DL DL DL 16 16 (LM)Western red-cedar DL DL DL DL 18 25 Black pine PL DL DL DL 10 26 Western red-cedar PL DL DL DL 14 27 (LM)Western red-cedar DL DL DL DL 17 57 (LM)Western red-cedar DL DL PL DL 17 58 Western red-cedar DL DL PL DL 17 59 Western red-cedar DL DL PL DL 15 IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS----GREEN’S LANDING SHORT PLATGREEN’SLANDINGSHORTPLATSHEET04LUA----C----GREEN’SLANDINGSHORTPLATR-----PR----