The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda AGENDA Planning & Development Committee Regular Meeting 3:00 PM - Monday, September 28, 2020 Video-conference 1. RMAC Youth Appointment a) AB - 2703 Mayor Pavone appoints Ms. Amelia Ossorio to the Renton Municipal Arts Commission as a youth member, with a term expiring December 31, 2023. 2. School District Impact Fees a) AB - 2689 Community & Economic Development Department recommends adopting the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and approve the collection of the requested impact fees as follows: Renton: Single family $7,681 (increase of $819); Multi-family $4,989 (increase of $1,407); Kent: Single Family $5,692.85 (increase of $138.85); Multi-family $2,404.63 (increase of $59.63); Issaquah: Single family $18,213 (increase of $3,712); Multi-family $12,043 (increase of $2,460). 3. Docket #15 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendments 5. Emerging Issues in CED Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Please click this URL to join. https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84566946989 Passcode: 528190 Or join by phone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 253 215 8782 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 Webinar ID: 845 6694 6989 Passcode: 528190 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kBqL3DxBc AB - 2703 City Council Regular Meeting - 14 Sep 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Youth Appointment to Renton Municipal Arts Commission-Amelia Ossorio RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Executive Department STAFF CONTACT: April Alexander, Executive Assistant EXT.: 6520 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: None SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Pavone appoints Ms. Amelia Ossorio to the Renton Municipal Arts Commission as a youth member with a term expiring 12/31/23. EXHIBITS: A. Recommendation Memo B. Application STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Pavone's appointment of Ms. Ossorio as a youth member of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 2, 2020 TO: Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM: C.E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator SUBJECT: Request for New Appointment to the Renton Municipal Arts Commission Youth Position and Resignation of Commissioner Duffy Delgado This memorandum is to recommend appointment of Amelia Ossorio to the vacant Youth Position on the Renton Municipal Arts Commission. If appointed, her term of service will expire on December 31, 2023. Amelia recently submitted an application to be considered for this position. The application includes the following statement of interest and experience: “I understand the power art has within communities… I have many ideas I want to discuss, like getting more teens involved in the Renton arts through social media. I have thousands of online viewers and support for my art using this platform, and I think it could be a great tool for the city to connect more with teen artists. I want to give back to the Renton community that has guided me to become the artist I am after all these years.” Amelia is a student at Hillside Student Community School and has been involved in the arts in Renton for more than 8 years. She recently volunteered with Allied Arts of Renton to produce a newsletter. In 2014, Amelia won a Student Division Third Place award and picked up the Reel Grrls Woman Filmmaker Award for her film “Brad goes to Renton,” about a bunny’s day out exploring the city. Amelia attended the July meeting of the Arts Commission and spoke about her interest in getting Renton youth involved in the Commission’s efforts to extend art and cultural opportunities to Renton’s diverse community. The Arts Commissioners were very favorably impressed with her maturity and her interest in Renton and the Arts Commission. They subsequently unanimously endorse her application. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) Armondo Pavone, Mayor Page 2 of 2 September 2, 2020 Duffy Delgado has served as a member of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission since April 2019. Duffy has missed seven consecutive Commission meetings and has failed to respond to attempts to contact him via email, phone and mail. Duffy’s term on the Commission was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2021. It is the recommendation of the Commission to remove Duffy from his position as Arts Commissioner and seek a replacement for the remainder of his term. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2689 City Council Regular Meeting - 14 Sep 2020 SUBJECT/TITLE: Adoption of 2020 School District Capital Facilities Plans and Impact Fees RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Paul Hintz, Senior Planner EXT.: 7436 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: School impact fees are collected by the City and remitted to the appropriate school district on a quarterly basis. The City will retain 5% of all school impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the fees. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts have each adopted their updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and requested the City of Renton collect revised impact fees for 2020, which are based on the need to complete projects that increase the capacity of school facilities to accommodate student body growth. The requested 2020 fees are shown below along with the currently applied 2019 fees. Renton 2019 2020 Change Single-Family $6,862 $7,681 $819 Multi-Family $3,582 $4,989 $1,407 Kent 2019 2020 Change Single-Family $5,554 $5,692.85 $138.85 Multi-Family $2,345 $2,404.63 $59.63 Issaquah 2019 2020 Change Single-Family $14,501 $18,213 $3,712 Multi-Family $9,583 $12,043 $2,460 EXHIBITS: A. Renton School District CFP B. Kent School District CFP C. Issaquah School District CFP STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and approve the collection of the requested impact fees. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Pam Teal, President Avanti Bergquist, MD, Vice President Alisa Louie Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D Gloria Hodge Dr. Damien Pattenaude, Superintendent May 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . …14 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 16 VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 VII. IMPACT FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 VIII. APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 1 - I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) was prepared by Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. It is the District’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City’s Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the District’s student population over the next six years; 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those students based on the District’s current Standard of Service; 3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities; 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub- element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District is currently engaged in dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 2 - Enrollment Projections: Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), as adjusted by Renton School District, indicate a minor overall decrease in K-12 enrollment over the next six years of 0.04 percent. While this overall decrease appears negligible, the individual changes at the elementary, middle, and high school levels are not. Enrollment projections for elementary and middle school grade levels indicate significant decreases of 4.16 percent and 4.46 percent, respectively. Projected enrollment at the high school grade levels, on the other hand, indicate a significant increase of 11.14 percent, or 458 students. Current Capacity: Student capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,788. Based on current enrollment (October 1, 2019 headcount), the District is showing a permanent facility deficit of 498 at the elementary level, reduced from last year’s deficit of 755, due to decreased enrollment. It should be noted, however, that current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the District’s current Standard of Service, and does not reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of 17 students to one teacher. Subsequent reports will, however, address this issue, which will significantly impact available capacity at our elementary schools. As a result of increased enrollment at middle schools, the current number of students now exceeds facility capacity by 49, while a decrease in recent high school enrollment results in a surplus capacity of 349, up from last year’s surplus of 245. Elementary school capacity still remains the District’s greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools now account for over 15% of the District’s total K – 5 facility capacity. Portables are, however, not considered permanent structures, and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Enrollment Projections and Future Capacity: District-wide, the overall K-12 growth rate has been fluctuating over the past decade, at an average rate of 0.78 percent. OSPI enrollment projections indicate an increasingly declining rate of growth over the next six years, at an average rate of -0.03 percent. This will result in an overall decrease in student population of 5 students by the school year 2024 – 2025. While this minor decrease may seem to indicate a leveling of growth, when viewed by facility-defined grade levels, we find that elementary and middle schools will experience significant declines, while, high school enrollment will increase annually. Acknowledging the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in 2018, and factoring in OSPI’s projected decrease in elementary school enrollment of 308 over the next six years, current capacity will still be insufficient to accommodate all K-5 students. With the AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 3 - passage of the 2019 RSD bond measure, the District is moving forward with design and construction of an additional elementary school, which, upon completion, will allow permanent capacity to surpass enrollment for the first time in nearly two decades. The District’s sixteenth elementary school is scheduled to open in the fall of 2023. Middle schools are currently showing a deficit capacity of 49. Based on OSPI’s enrollment projections, we can expect a decrease of 155 students over the next six years, which will change the current deficit to a surplus of 106. There are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity. At the high school level, projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 458 students. With a current surplus capacity of 349, this enrollment increase will result in a deficit of 104 by the school year 2023 – 2024. That deficit will be mitigated by the construction of new science classrooms, and the renovation of existing science classrooms, at Lindbergh High School, increasing capacity by 84. This increase, however, will still result in a deficit of 25 by the school year 2025 – 2026. There are no additional plans at this time to increase high school capacity. Capital Construction Plan: For the next six-year period, the District’s highest priorities will be addressing existing and projected facility capacity deficits, both growth and program related. This includes: • Construction of a new elementary school within the Hazen High School service area, where the majority of growth has and continues to occur. • High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements • Acquisition of land for future development. • Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms Other high priority capital improvements will fall into one or more of the following major categories; Safety and Security, Energy Conservation, Site Improvements, and Building Upgrades. Improvements will occur district-wide, affecting nearly all District facilities, achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy, and nurturing learning environments for all students. These improvements are not necessarily enrollment related. Many of these projects will be funded by the 2019 Bond Measure passed in November 2019. Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2019 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2016 capital levy; and school impact fees currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. Expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the next six years are estimated at $77,362,000, of which 100% is secured by the 2019 Bond Measure approved by the voters in November 2019, and previously collected impact fees. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 4 - Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, resulting in an increase of $819 per unit for single-family fees, and an increase in multi-family fees of $1,407 per unit. The primary variables contributing to these increases are 1) construction costs, based on actual construction costs of the recently completed Sartori Elementary School, 2) a decrease in the State Construction Assistance percentage, and 3) an increase in the Student Generation Factors for multi-family residential construction. These increases were somewhat mitigated by the increased value of residential property and the decline of the Bond Buyer 20-Bond General Obligation Index. A comparison of current and last year’s fees is shown below. IMPACT FEES 2019 2020 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY $6,862 $7,681 $819 MULTI-FAMILY $3,582 $4,989 $1,407 TABLE 1 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 5 - II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY STANDARD OF SERVICE The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid-June. Similarly, the District maintains a fairly common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The District, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 20:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 - 6 - specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83% to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Now, beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of 24 credits; three more than the previously required 21. This will impact high school capacity, especially regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in this update, although it is not addressed in the calculation of this year’s impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs, operating policy and contractual restrictions. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing students, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 7 Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five-period day, capacity is reduced by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. Although not reflected in this year’s update, future building capacity will be affected by the reduced student/teacher ratios for grades K-3 as prescribed by the McCleary Act. A 2015 survey conducted as part of the K-3 Classroom Reduction Grant Program, authorized by SSB 6080, and validated under the auspices of OSPI, indicated that Renton School District will require an additional 42 classrooms to meet the aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratio of 17:1, the equivalent of two new schools. While State prescribed student/teacher ratios changes will affect future facility capacity, it is not addressed in this Plan, as the District has not yet adopted a strategy to achieve this goal. Subsequent reports will however, fully address the implications of this mandate and its effect on capacity and enrollment. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 8 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 32 permanent and 55 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 15,172 (October 2019 headcount). The District’s permanent K-12 facilities include 15 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and 4 high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District’s early childhood, special education and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet, with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District’s relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students, and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the District’s inventory, 44 are “double portables” containing two classrooms, and 11 are singles. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 99 relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. Table 2 includes all facilities. Table 3 indicates capacities in term of high school Service Areas. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in Appendix B. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Facility Type Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Total Permanent 6,895 84.6% 3,435 88.3% 4,458 98.0% 14,788 89.1% Relocatable 1,252 15.4% 457 11.7% 92 2.0% 1,801 10.9% Total 8,147 100% 3,892 100% 4,550 100% 16,589 100% TABLE 2 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 9 CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Facility Type Lindbergh Hazen Renton High Total Elementary Permanent 1843 2423 2075 6341 Relocatable 183 618 451 1252 Total Elem 2026 3041 2526 7593 Middle Permanent 896 1745 794 3435 Relocatable 183 183 91 457 Total Elem 1079 1928 885 3892 High Permanent 1211 1462 1389 4062 Relocatable 92 0 0 92 Total Elem 1303 1462 1389 4154 Grand Total 4408 6431 4800 15639 TABLE 3 1. Does not include Sartori Elementary and Talley High, as they are not associated with a particular service area. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 10 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of Classrooms School ID Numbers Area (sq. ft.) Student Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 11 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 Total 99 88,704 2,669 Table 4 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 12 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 69. 80. 90. 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 84, 103, 104, 105, 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 62, 64, 70, 113, 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92, 108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 93, 94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 88,704 2669 TABLE 5 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 13 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres Chelan Ave. Site Chelan Ave. NE & NE 12th St., Renton 10.8 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 3rd St., Renton 0.31 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 5th Ave., Renton 0.45 Acres AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 14 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Renton School District six-year enrollment projections through the 2025-26 school year are based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to forecast student enrollment projections for a six-year period based on actual student headcounts documented for the previous six years. Enrollment reports prepared by the District are submitted to OSPI on a monthly basis. The District’s October 1, 2019 Enrollment Report, and OSPI Report No. 1049, are included in Appendix C. Renton School District six-year enrollment projections, found on the following page, reflect adjustments to OSPI’s report based on the following: 1. Report structure has been modified to reflect middle school versus junior high school grade level configuration. 2. Headcount includes only K-12 students attending comprehensive instructional facilities and excludes students attending special education facilities or facilities dedicated to alternative learning experiences. As shown in Table 6 below, current projections indicate an overall decrease in K-12 student enrollment of 0.04 percent over the next six years. Although this change appears to be negligible, when broken down by grade levels, that is not the case. At the elementary level, we can expect a 4.16 percent decrease in enrollment, equal to a loss of 308 students. At the middle school level, projections indicate a 4.46 percent decrease, equivalent to 155 students. Both of these losses, however, are offset by the projected 11.14 percent increase in high school enrollment, adding an additional 458 students. It should be noted that these conservative projections, based on OSPI’s cohort survival methodology, do not take into account birth rates, housing starts, or other demographic data. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH Actual Oct. 2018 Headcount Actual Oct. 2019 Headcount Oct. 2025 Projected Headcount Actual Change 2018-2019 Actual Change (%) 2018-2019 Projected Change 2019-2025 Percentage Change 2019-2025 Elementary 7,650 7,393 7,085 (257) -3.36% -308 -4.16% Middle 3,391 3,484 3,329 93 2.74% -155 -4.46% High 4,213 4,109 4,567 (104) -2.47% 458 11.14% Total 15,254 14,986 14,981 (268) -1.76% -5 -0.04% TABLE 6 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 15 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL* (KK Linear Projection) Actual Headcount Oct. 2019 Ave. % Survival 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Kindergarten 1,252 1,234 1,224 1,213 1,203 1,192 1,182 Grade 1 1,236 100.91% 1,263 1,245 1,235 1,224 1,214 1,203 Grade 2 1,199 97.94% 1,211 1,237 1,220 1,210 1,199 1,189 Grade 3 1,202 98.37% 1,179 1,191 1,217 1,200 1,190 1,179 Grade 4 1,237 98.34% 1,182 1,160 1,171 1,197 1,180 1,170 Grade 5 1,267 98.48% 1,218 1,164 1,142 1,153 1,179 1,162 TOTAL K-5 7,393 7,288 7,221 7,198 7,187 7,153 7,085 Grade 6 1,226 96.39% 1,221 1,174 1,122 1,101 1,112 1,136 Grade 7 1,153 99.51% 1,220 1,215 1,168 1,117 1,096 1,106 Grade 8 1,105 99.14% 1,143 1,210 1,205 1,158 1,107 1,086 TOTAL 6-8 3,484 3,584 3,599 3,495 3,376 3,314 3,329 Grade 9 1,110 101.12% 1,117 1,156 1,223 1,218 1,171 1,119 Grade 10 1,117 101.36% 1,125 1,133 1,172 1,240 1,235 1,187 Grade 11 956 90.76% 1,014 1,021 1,028 1,063 1,125 1,121 Grade 12 926 101.26% 968 1,027 1,034 1,041 1,077 1,139 TOTAL 9-12 4,109 4,224 4,336 4,457 4,562 4,608 4,567 TOTAL K-12 14,986 15,096 15,157 15,150 15,125 15,076 14,981 YEARLY CHANGE 110 60 -6 -25 -49 -95 YEARLY CHANGE % 0.74% 0.40% -0.04% -0.17% -0.33% -0.63% CUMULATIVE CHANGE 110 171 164 139 90 -5 CUMULATIVE CHANGE % 0.74% 1.14% 1.10% 0.93% 0.60% -0.04% TABLE 7 *Information adapted from OSPI Enrollment Projections, Report No. 1049. Headcount and projections do not include enrollment at special use instructional facilities AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 16 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40% to 755. Currently, as a result of recent enrollment declines, that deficit has been further reduced to 498. However, even with the K-5 enrollment decreases projected through the 2025 -26 school year, existing facilities will still be inadequate to house all K-5 students. Aside from these growth related deficits, the future implementation of reduced K-3 student/teacher ratios, as prescribed by the McCleary Act, will further necessitate the need for additional elementary school capacity. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November, 2019, the District is proceeding with the design and construction of its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the District has experienced the most growth in the past. The new school is scheduled to be completed and opened for the 2023-24 school year. To get a better understanding of enrollment driven facility needs at the K-5 level, it is helpful to view existing conditions in terms of high school Service Areas. As indicated in the table below, the vast majority of the District’s elementary facility deficit occurs within the Hazen High School Service Area, representing approximately 95% of the total shortfall. Although growth in this area has slowed down over the past decade, it has not recovered from the construction boom of the early 2000’s. The need for additional permanent facilities in the Hazen Service Area, to replace the multitude of relocatable facilities that have overtaken student play areas, has been a District goal for a number of years. With the passage of the 2019 Bond, the District is now able to proceed with construction of a new elementary school, bringing equity, in the way of permanent classroom facilities, to the East Hill of Renton. ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT/CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Lindbergh Service Area Hazen Service Area Renton Service Area Total Oct. 2019 Head Count 1,865 2,915 2,078 6,858 Permanent Facility Capacity 1,843 2,423 2,075 6,341 Permanent Surplus (Deficit) Capacity (22) (492) (3) (517) TABLE 8 At the middle school level, enrollment projections indicate that, due to decreased enrollment, the current deficit of 39 unhoused students will become a surplus of 106 by the 2025-26 school year. There are currently no enrollment driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. At the high school level, the District continues showing a decreasing surplus capacity until 2023, when enrollment overtakes capacity, resulting in a deficit of 20. The deficit increases to 66 in 2024, and then reduces to 25 for the 2025-26 school year. Although the need for additional facilities based on enrollment growth is not a priority at this time, recent changes in graduation requirements have created the need for additional science classrooms and laboratories. Changed requirements include an increase from 21 to 24 credits, and one AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 17 addition credit of Science. As part of the recently passed 2019 Bond Measure, the District will be constructing additional science classrooms at Lindbergh High School and renovating/upgrading existing science classrooms at all three comprehensive high schools. In addition to these current and/or future projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at its existing sites, due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of Impact Fees, the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Table 8A compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. SURPLUS/DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS1 2019-2025 ELEMENTARY 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Permanent Capacity 6,895 6,895 6,895 6,895 7,545 7,545 7,545 Student Enrollment 7,393 7,288 7,221 7,198 7,187 7,153 7,085 Surplus (Deficit Capacity) (498) (393) (326) (303) 358 392 460 MIDDLE SCHOOL Permanent Capacity 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 Student Enrollment 3,484 3,584 3,599 3,495 3,376 3,314 3,329 Surplus (Deficit Capacity) (49) (149) (164) (60) 59 121 106 HIGH SCHOOL Permanent Capacity 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,542 4,542 4,542 Student Enrollment 4,109 4,224 4,336 4,457 4,562 4,608 4,567 Surplus (Deficit Capacity) 349 234 122 1 (20) (66) (25) TABLE 8A 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 18 VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Enrollment driven capital improvements projects identified in this Plan will be funded by the 2019 Capital Bond funds, and school impact fees assessed and collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District does not appear to be eligible for any funding through the OSPI School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) at this point in time, based on the construction projects included in this update.. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement programs is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period in order to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the Districts total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated in Table 9 below. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN – GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES1 ($1,000’s) FUNDING (1,000’s) 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Secured2 Un-secured3 New Elementary School 1,120 16,800 26,880 10,080 1,120 56,000 56,000 Science Classrooms 817 1,088 4,406 9,423 766 16,500 16,500 Land Acquisition 2,431 2,431 4,862 4,862 Total 1,937 17,888 33,717 21,934 1,886 0 77,362 77,362 TABLE 9 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. 3. Unsecured funds include future school impact fees and bond initiatives. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 19 VII. IMPACT FEES The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King County Code 21A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish “Student Generation Factors” that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi-family residential unit constructed and establish district-specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix D for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit – Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates. Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A, impact fees for the plan year 2020 are: Single-Family Units $ 7,681 Multi-Family Units $ 4,989 Single-Family and Multi-Family Fee Calculation spreadsheet follows. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 20 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST Facility Site area (Acres) Cost per acre Facilities Capacity Single Family Multi-Family SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 10 650,000 650 0.301 $3,010 0.176 $1,763.85 Middle 0 650 850 0.129 $0 0.077 $0.00 High 0 650 1250 0.132 $0 0.078 $0.00 Total $3,010 Total $1,764 SCHOOL SCONSTRUCTION COST Facility Permanent % of Total Facilities Family Cost (2020 $) Facilities Capacity Single Family Multi-Family SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 84.63% 48,434,125 650 0.301 $18,982 0.176 $11,123 Middle 88.25% 0 850 0.129 $0 $0.077 $0 High 97.97% 0 1,250 0.132 $0 $0.078 $0 Total $18,982 Total $11,123 TEMPORARY FACILITY COST Facility Permanent % of Total Facilities Family Cost (2019 $) Facilities Capacity Single Family Multi-Family SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 15.37% 0 29 0.301 $0 0.176 $0 Middle 11.75% 0 26 0.129 $0 0.077 $0 High 2.03% 0 26 0.132 $0 0.078 $0 Total $0 Total $0 OSPI SCAP Facility Cost allocation per Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. per student Assistance Percentage Single Family Multi-Family SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 238.22 90 0.3133 0.301 ($2,022) 0.176 ($1,185) Middle 238.22 117 0.3133 0.129 $0 0.077 $0 High 238.22 130 0.3133 0.132 $0 0.078 $0 Total ($2,022) Total ($1,185) TAX CREDIT (TC) SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Average Assessed Value (AAV) $478,910 $179,200 Interest Rate for Bonds (i) 2.44% 2.44% Term (t = maximum 10 yrs.) 10 10 Tax Rate (r) 0.001096 0.001096 TC TOTAL ($4,608) ($1,724) FACILITY CREDIT $0 $0 TOTAL FEE $15,362 $9,978 50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION 7,681 4,989 IMPACT FEE 7,681 4,989 TABLE 10 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 21 * TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = ((1+i)t-1)/i(1+i)t AAV = Average assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2019 t = Bond Term AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 22 XIII. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24 APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 APPENDIX D: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 31 APPENDIX E: CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 33 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 23 APPENDIX A RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B 24 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 20:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 430 109 52 50 63 32 116 6,895 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,147 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B 25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Permanent Teaching Stations LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 Relocatable Classrooms LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 Permanent Teaching Stations HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TOTAL 110 27 16 14 12 8 25 1,832 Relocatable Classrooms HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B 26 Permanent Teaching Stations RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 Relocatable Classrooms RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B 27 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 MCKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 TOTAL 181 92 12 5 4 17 23 28 3,435 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap DIMMIT 4 4 0 0 91 885 MCKNIGHT 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 20 20 0 0 457 3,892 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B 28 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 Talley) PE 40:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 Talley) Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 LINDBERGH 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 TALLEY 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 TOTAL 225 123 10 4 3 21 51 13 4,458 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap HAZEN 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGH 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 TABLE 11 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C 29 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C 30 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D 31 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of eleven school districts, including Renton School District. Of those eleven districts, seven districts conduct their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on district records and actual development data. The remaining four districts, including Renton, rely on averages of student factors developed by other districts. In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen to use a county-wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student generation factor surveys as well as those that have similarly relied on county-wide data. The Student Generation Factors in the table below represent an average of the student rates calculated by the other ten school districts. STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Elementary (K-5) Middle School (6-8) High School (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.301 0.129 0.132 0.561 MULTI-FAMILY 0.176 0.077 0.078 0.331 TABLE 13 The table on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan’s impact fee calculations. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D 32 COUNTY-WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT K-5 6-8 9-12 Total K-5 6-8 9-12 Total Auburn 0.237 0.096 0.128 0.461 0.382 0.153 0.151 0.686 Enumclaw 0.335 0.139 0.139 0.613 0.174 0.074 0.077 0.325 Federal Way 0.179 0.090 0.139 0.408 0.585 0.294 0.312 1.191 Fife 0.263 0.147 0.071 0.481 0.086 0.039 0.013 0.138 Highline 0.145 0.070 0.104 0.319 0.116 0.048 0.038 0.202 Issaquah 0.308 0.157 0.173 0.638 0.195 0.087 0.098 0.380 Kent 0.398 0.096 0.185 0.679 0.117 0.028 0.029 0.174 Lake Washington 0.436 0.182 0.159 0.777 0.082 0.032 0.025 0.139 Mercer Island 0.211 0.128 0.074 0.413 0.019 0.010 0.014 0.043 Northshore 0.359 0.120 0.094 0.573 0.062 0.031 0.042 0.135 Riverview 0.335 0.139 0.139 0.613 0.174 0.074 0.077 0.325 Snoqualmie Valley 0.372 0.170 0.166 0.708 0.127 0.055 0.058 0.240 Tahoma 0.335 0.139 0.139 0.613 0.174 0.074 0.077 0.325 TOTAL 3.913 1.673 1.710 7.296 2.293 0.999 1.011 4.303 Average 0.301 0.129 0.132 0.561 0.176 0.077 0.078 0.331 TABLE 14 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2020 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E - 33 - CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) 2019 2020 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 6,895 0 Middle 3,435 3,435 (0) High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 14,788 (0) STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) 2019 2020 CHANGE Elementary 7,650 7,393 (257) Middle 3,391 3,484 93 High 4,213 4,109 (104) Total 15,254 14,986 (268) IMPACT FEES 2019 2020 CHANGE Single-Family 6,862 7,681 819 Multi-Family 3,582 4,989 1,407 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2019 2020 CHANGE Single-Family Elementary 0.321 0.301 (0.020) Middle 0.121 0.129 0.008 High 0.132 0.132 (0.000) Total 0.586 0.561 (0.025) Multi-Family Elementary 0.153 0.176 0.023 Middle 0.068 0.077 0.009 High 0.073 0.078 0.005 Total 0.294 0.331 0.037 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2019 2020 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre 650,000 650,000 0 Temp. Building Acquisition 177,000 177,000 0 State Match Percentage 0.3809 0.3133 -17.75% Ave. Assessed Value - Single 469,537 478,910 9,373 Ave. Assessed Value - Multi 144,672 179,200 34,528 Bond Interest Rate 4.04% 2.44% -39.60% Tax Rate per $1000 1.03306 1.09602 0.06296 Construction Cost Allocation 225.97 238.22 12.25 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-21 through 2025-2026 June 2020 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Leslie Hamada, President Ms. Denise Daniels, Vice President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative Ms. Michele Bettinger, Director Ms. Leah Bowen, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 2 of 15 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ................................................................................... 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" .................................................... 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 7 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ................................................................ 8 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ..................................................................... 9 VI - Portable Classrooms .................................................................................................. 10 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ................................................................... 11 VIII - Finance Plan ............................................................................................................. 12 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan ....................................... 14 X - Appendices .................................................................................................................. 15 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 3 of 15 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2020 for the 2020-2021 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 4 of 15 of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond. Additional information about these projects can be found at the district’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 7.75% of 25,800 King County live births in 2015 is projected for 1,976 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2020. This is an increase of 139 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first-grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2020-2025 are from OSPI Report 1049 – Determination of Projected Enrollments. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 5 of 15 Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .334 Middle School .078 Senior High .117 Total .529 Multi-Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .048 Total .193 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,767 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. In preparing the 2020-2021 to 2025-2026 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single-family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 October HC Enrollment 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 King County Live Births 1 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 Increase / Decrease -194 1,564 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.13%8.18%8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93% Kindergarten 1845 1983 2134 2119 2090 2045 2013 2037 1989 2010 Grade 1 1996 1888 2017 2186 2127 2131 2067 2056 2061 2036 Grade 2 1942 2016 1905 2055 2190 2163 2163 2077 2008 2091 Grade 3 2002 1983 2082 1922 2070 2176 2195 2143 2043 1995 Grade 4 1956 2024 2000 2087 1956 2089 2195 2218 2118 2038 Grade 5 2086 1974 2044 2008 2116 1958 2103 2189 2169 2120 Grade 6 2135 2135 2026 2079 2023 2058 1952 2120 2184 2164 Grade 7 Middle School 2095 2105 2139 2046 2104 1974 2021 1922 2044 2166 Grade 8 " "2153 2111 2139 2121 2091 2100 2021 2043 1882 2073 Grade 9 Senior High 2440 2471 2455 2483 2428 2093 2105 2006 2004 1888 Grade 10 " "2238 2272 2092 2046 2151 2165 2099 2080 1946 2035 Grade 11 " "2048 1995 1933 1873 1802 1818 1865 1823 1732 1663 Grade 12 " "1694 1658 1646 1539 1576 1742 1730 1810 1654 1634 Total Enrollment 2 26,630 26,615 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -134 -15 -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 Cumulative Increase -201 -216 -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. For 2020 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 Est LB in 2020 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 King County Live Births 25,348 25,487 26,011 26,011 26,011 26,011 26,011 Increase / Decrease 438 139 524 0 0 0 0 Kindergarten / Birth % 7.93%7.75%7.54%7.48%7.42%7.36%7.30% FD Kindergarten 2,010 1,976 1,961 1,945 1,929 1,914 1,898 Grade 1 2,036 2,045 2,010 1,995 1,978 1,962 1,947 Grade 2 2,091 2,047 2,056 2,021 2,006 1,989 1,973 Grade 3 1,995 2,081 2,037 2,046 2,011 1,996 1,979 Grade 4 2,038 2,000 2,087 2,042 2,052 2,016 2,001 Grade 5 2,120 2,031 1,993 2,080 2,035 2,045 2,009 Grade 6 2,164 2,109 2,020 1,982 2,069 2,024 2,034 Grade 7 2,166 2,120 2,066 1,979 1,942 2,027 1,983 Grade 8 2,073 2,177 2,131 2,077 1,989 1,952 2,038 Grade 9 1,888 2,064 2,168 2,122 2,068 1,981 1,944 Grade 10 2,035 1,838 2,009 2,111 2,066 2,013 1,929 Grade 11 1,663 1,735 1,567 1,712 1,799 1,761 1,716 Grade 12 1,634 1,577 1,645 1,486 1,623 1,706 1,670 Total Enrollment Projection 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 25,121 Yearly Increase/Decrease 79 -113 -50 -152 -31 -181 -265 Yearly Increase/Decrease %0.31%-0.44%-0.19%-0.59%-0.12%-0.71%-1.04% Total Enrollment Projection 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 25,121 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 2019- 2025 Projections from OSPI Report 1049 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 6 of 15 Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail, it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three- bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi- family housing units. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line during 2020-2021. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 7 of 15 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2019-2020 SCHOOL Year Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,055 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,310 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 8 of 15 • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,310 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2019. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Both the Kent Mountain View Academy and the Kent Phoenix Academy are now sharing the building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School beginning the school year 2019- 2020. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 9 of 15 iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School. At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2020, the following projects to increase capacity are either in the planning phase or will start in spring 2020. • Construction is in progress for New Valley Elementary School (project name only) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6 school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. • Construction is in progress to add New Academy Facility at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoyah Middle School) for additional classroom space if needed and/or to open another middle school in the near future. The new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School District. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Site map). AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY 6 New Valley Elementary School Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary Addition Under Construction 2021-2022 700 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH 3 New Academy Site Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy Under Construction 2021-2022 480 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2020+24 - 31 each 100% # onMap 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land UseDesignation Type 1 164th SE (Across from Mattson)25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042 Rural TBD 2 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 10 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. King County King County Land UseJurisdiction King County King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 FairwoodElementary RidgewoodElementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary GlenridgeElementary Kentridge High School Panther Lake Elementary Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek ElementarySunriseElementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow RidgeElementary Pine TreeElementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar ValleyElementaryJenkins Creek Elementary KentwoodHigh School Crestwood Elementary MattsonMiddle School Sawyer WoodsElementary KentlakeHigh School Kent Mountain View Academy Neely O’BrienElementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 10 of 15 Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2020. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) New Elementary School2 700 New Academy (Old PL Site)480 Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435 28,435 Interim Portable Capacity 3 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 336 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,695 28,503 28,891 28,771 28,771 28,771 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 4 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 5 2,782 2,703 3,141 3,173 3,204 3,385 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 New Elementary school will increase capacity and will be built on the existing site of Kent Mountain View Academy. 3 2019-2020 total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes. 4 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 5 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700 New Elementary School - Kent Valley 700 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700 Portable Capacity Required 1 1440 1248 456 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,440 14,248 14,156 14,036 14,036 14,036 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 14,454 14,289 14,164 14,111 14,080 13,946 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY -14 -41 -8 -75 -44 90 Number of Portables Required 60 52 19 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollment Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Prescho P R O J E C T E Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-2026 Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes to Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,239 4,297 4,197 4,056 3,931 3,979 4,021 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 909 851 951 1,092 1,217 1,169 1,127 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 New Academy (Old PL site)480 No Changes to High School Capacity Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,220 7,214 7,389 7,431 7,556 7,461 7,259 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,077 1,083 1,388 1,346 1,221 1,316 1,518 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 11 of 15 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2019 was 25,833 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2019 totals 26,749 which included ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2019, there were 1,177 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 664 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 12 of 15 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2020-2021 through 2025-2026. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley which is currently under construction at the current site of the Kent Mountain View Academy on Military Road in SeaTac. Kent Mountain View Academy moved into and is sharing space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy (located at the former Sequoyah Middle School) starting the 2019-2020 school year. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 700 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the pacific northwest. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Department. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES New Elementary School - Kent Valley F $11,000,000 $16,000,000 $26,000,000 $53,000,000 $51,000,000 $2,000,000 Elementary Site Acquisition (10 acres)F $1,770,355 $1,770,355 $1,270,355 $500,000 New Academy Facility / 20 Classrooms F $5,000,000 $13,000,000 $18,000,000 $36,000,000 $30,000,000 $6,000,000 No Secondary School Projects at this time. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 U $393,750 $393,750 $393,750 3 portables OTHER N / A Totals $18,164,105 $29,000,000 $44,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,164,105 $82,270,355 $0 $8,893,750 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / PurchasedSold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 SE 264th St., Kent 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 60.95 $6,917,588 $113,496 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2010 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 60.95 $6,917,588 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson)2000 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $113,496 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 13 of 15 Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School Kent Valley (To open Fall 2021) $53,000,000 New Academy Facility (To open Fall 2021) $36,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.5%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 14 of 15 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2019 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor David Demographics out of Riverside California to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2021 calendar year will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2021 calendar year is 2.5%. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $138.85 to $5,692.85. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $58.63 to $2,403.63. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 15 of 15 X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.398 0.334 Single Family (SF) MS 0.096 0.078 SH 0.185 0.117 Total 0.679 0.529 0.150 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.117 0.117 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.028 0.028 SH 0.029 0.048 Total 0.174 0.193 0.019 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $225.97 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $407,255 $423,247 Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $151,126 $164,546 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.04 $1.41 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.95% 2.16% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,554 $5,692.85 Increase of $138.85 or 2.5% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,345 $2,403.63 Increase of $58.63 or 2.5% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6)0.334 Elementary 0.117 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.078 Middle School 0.028 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.117 Senior High 0.048 Total 0.529 Total 0.193 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 700 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High (Academy)480 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)11 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required)21 Elementary $113,496 Senior High (required)32 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary *$53,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $0 Senior High * (Academy)$36,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 * See cost basis on Pg. 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 143,372 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96% Middle School 10,736 Senior High 21,296 Total 5.1%175,404 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $238.22 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,571,558Middle School 764,809 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,048,939 Single Family Residence $426,418 Total 94.9%3,385,306 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,714,930 Multi-Family Residence $177,957 Middle School 775,545 Senior High 1,070,235 Total 3,560,710 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 1.41 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0014 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16% CPI Inflation Factor 2.50% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)11 $113,496 700 0.334 $595.69 A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 0 0.078 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 480 0.117 $0.00 Total 64 $113,496 1,180 0.529 A $595.69 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$53,000,000 700 0.334 0.903 $22,835.58 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.078 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 480 0.117 0.998 $8,757.45 Total $89,000,000 1,180 0.529 B $31,593.03 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.334 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.078 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.117 0.02 $0 Total $0 84 0.529 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 90 0.5696 0.334 $4,078.84 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 117 0.5696 0.078 $1,238 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 130 0.5696 0.117 $2,064D $7,381.00 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$426,418 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $5,351.12 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $595.69 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $31,593.03 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 Subtotal $32,188.72 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,381.00 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $5,351.12 Subtotal $12,732.12 Total Unfunded Need $19,456.60 50% Developer Fee Obligation $9,728 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)($4,035) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,692.85 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)11 $113,496 700 0.117 $208.67 A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 0 0.028 A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 480 0.048 $0.00 Total $64 113,496 1,180 0.193A $208.67 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$53,000,000 700 0.117 0.903 $7,999.29 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.028 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 480 0.048 0.998 $3,592.80 Total $89,000,000 1,180 0.193 B $11,592.09 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.117 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.048 0.02 $0 Total $0 84 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 90 0.5696 0.117 $1,428.82 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 117 0.5696 0.028 $445 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 130 0.5696 0.048 $847D $2,720.04 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$177,957 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $2,233.18 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $208.67 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $11,592.09 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 Subtotal $11,800.76 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,720.04 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,233.18 Subtotal -$4,953.23 Total Unfunded Need $6,847.53 50% Developer Fee Obligation $3,424 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)($1,019) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,404.63 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)June 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 1 Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted May 28, 2020 Resolution No. 1148 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ...................................................................... 4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION .............................................................. 5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING .................................................................. 5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ..... 6 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................ 8 TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2011-12 through 2019-20 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2020-21 through 2034-35 ................... 9 TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY ............................ 10 TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI-FAMILY .......................... 11 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ..................... 12 SITE LOCATION MAP ......................................................................... 13 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP………………………………………………14 SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ........................................................ 15 TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS ............ 15 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ................................................ 16 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ......... 17 APPENDIX A: 2019-20 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES .................. 18 APPENDIX B: 2019-20 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ........................... 19 APPENDIX C: 2019-20 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................... 20 APPENDIX D: 2019-20 DISTRICT TOTAL CAPACITIES ........................... 21 APPENDIX E: SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN .............................................. 22 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2020. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by I-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation that requires the State to fund Full-Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full- Day Kindergarten beginning in the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school could not be used for its long planned purpose. The District sold this planned site to a third party. The District has acquired one high school site, two elementary school sites and one middle school site inside the UGBL. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. Approved Bond funding provides for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 5 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, and the expansion of an existing elementary school to meet the needs of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The planned facilities will be funded by a bond passed on April 26, 2016, school impact fees and reserve funds held by the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. Generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing is shown on page 10 and page 11. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 6 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. On April 26, 2016 voters approved bond funding for the construction of a new high school, a new middle school and two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 18) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 100%) to serve 8,676 students at the elementary level. Appendix B, (page 19) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) for 4,496 students at the middle school level Appendix C (page 20) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) of 5,124 students at the high school level. Current enrollment is identified on page 9. The District elementary projected Oct 2020 FTE is 9,349. Adjusting permanent capacity by 95% leaves the District’s elementary enrollment over permanent capacity at the elementary level by 1,107 students (Appendix A). At the middle school level, the projected Oct 2020 headcount is 5,215. This is 944 students over permanent capacity (Appendix B). At the high school level the district is over permanent capacity by 929 students (Appendix C). Based on the District’s student generation rates, the District expects that 0.768 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.461 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2025-26, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 1,259 students, over permanent capacity at the middle school level by 861 students, and over by 1,378 students at the high school level. The District’s enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival – historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 7 To address existing and future capacity needs, the District’s six-year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Expansions Projected / Final Completion Date Location Additional Capacity New High School New Elementary #17 New Middle School Expand Maple Hills Elementary New Elementary #16 2022 2022 2021 2021 2021 Issaquah Issaquah Issaquah King County Sammamish 1600 560 850 120 560 Based upon the District’s capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are necessary to serve students generated by new development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 - .110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District’s recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 8 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., seek to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new dwelling units are converted to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. Enrollment projections for the years 2020-2021 through 2034-2035 are shown in Table One. Student generation factors are shown in Table Two and Table Three. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 9 TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2011-12 through 2019-20 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2020-21 through 2034-35 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 10 TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY 2019-20 Single Family Single Family Development # Planned # Sold K-5 6-8 9-12 Total K-5 6-8 9-12 Total Belvedere 94 93 42 19 17 78 0.452 0.204 0.183 0.839 Cedarcroft 27 26 11 2 2 15 0.423 0.077 0.077 0.577 Chestnut Estates 38 38 16 4 9 29 0.421 0.105 0.237 0.763 Claremont @ Renton 91 91 16 8 4 28 0.176 0.088 0.044 0.308 Dalton Park 39 39 10 3 2 15 0.256 0.077 0.051 0.385 Forest Heights 24 17 0 0 2 2 0.000 0.000 0.118 0.118 Glencoe, Preswick & Kinlock @ Trossachs 211 210 111 64 73 248 0.529 0.305 0.348 1.181 Heritage Estates 86 86 43 21 21 85 0.500 0.244 0.244 0.988 Highcroft @ Sammamish 121 121 65 29 26 120 0.537 0.240 0.215 0.992 Issaquah Highlands - Ichijo Sun Ridge 35 35 13 3 4 20 0.371 0.086 0.114 0.571 Issaquah Highlands - Westridge South 72 71 8 6 10 24 0.113 0.085 0.141 0.338 Lawson Park 31 31 20 12 5 37 0.645 0.387 0.161 1.194 Liberty Gardens 36 36 5 1 0 6 0.139 0.028 0.000 0.167 Meadowleaf 115 64 13 7 1 21 0.203 0.109 0.016 0.328 Overlook @ Brookshire 38 38 18 4 7 29 0.474 0.105 0.184 0.763 Providence Ridge 38 34 8 1 2 11 0.235 0.029 0.059 0.324 Summit Pickering/Inneswood Estates 30 30 10 8 10 28 0.333 0.267 0.333 0.933 Rivenwood 52 52 41 15 14 70 0.788 0.288 0.269 1.346 Shorelane Vistas 38 38 8 10 9 27 0.211 0.263 0.237 0.711 Symphony Ridge 57 57 18 11 5 34 0.316 0.193 0.088 0.596 TOTALS 1273 1207 476 228 223 927 0.394 0.189 0.185 0.768 SINGLE FAMILY Elementary School 0.394 Middle School 6 - 8 0.189 High School 9 - 12 0.185 TOTAL 0.768 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years. STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 11 TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI-FAMILY 2019-20 Multi Family Multi Family Development # Planned # Sold K-5 6-8 9-12 Total K-5 6-8 9-12 Total Avalon Bay Apartments 771 100 30 10 11 51 0.300 0.100 0.110 0.510 Aldea at Newcastle Commons 129 63 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Issaquah Highlands - View Ridge 38 38 4 9 6 19 0.105 0.237 0.158 0.500 Issaquah Highlands - The Brownstones 176 176 25 8 17 50 0.142 0.045 0.097 0.284 Lakehouse 41 38 7 3 3 13 0.184 0.079 0.079 0.342 Overlook @ Brookshire 42 42 18 4 7 29 0.429 0.095 0.167 0.690 Towns at Westridge 110 83 38 24 25 87 0.458 0.289 0.301 1.048 TOTALS 1307 540 122 58 69 249 0.226 0.107 0.128 0.461 MULTI FAMILY Elementary School 0.226 Middle School 6 - 8 0.107 High School 9 - 12 0.128 TOTAL 0.461 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years. STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 12 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 17,381 students in permanent facilities and 4,366 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the 2020- 2021 school year is expected to be 20,361 including K-5 FTE which leaves a permanent capacity deficit of 2,980. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations gives us a capacity of 21,747 with a surplus capacity of 1,387 for the K-12 student population. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Campus 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 13 SITE LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 14 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 15 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table Four is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 20,361 FTE students for the 2020-2021 school year and 20,879 FTE students in the 2025-2026 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth-related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS Years 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Permanent Capacity 18,296 18,296 19,826 21,986 21,986 21,986 High School 1,600 Middle School 850 Elementary School 680 560 Gross Totals 18,296 19,826 21,986 21,986 21,986 21,986 *Subtotal (Sum at 95% Utilization Rate)17,381 18,835 20,887 20,887 20,887 20,887 Portables @ 95%4,366 4,366 4,366 4,366 4,366 4,366 Total Capacity 21,747 23,201 25,253 25,253 25,253 25,253 Projected FTE Enrollment**20,361 20,645 20,705 20,739 20,802 20,879 Permanent Capacity @ 95% (surplus/deficit)-2,980 -1,810 182 148 85 8 Permanent Cap w/Portables (surplus/deficit)1,386 2,556 4,548 4,514 4,451 4,374 The number of planned portables may be reduced if permanent capacity is increased by a future bond issue. Projected Capacity to House Students *Permanent Capacity and New Construction calculations are based on the 95% utilization factors (See Appendix D) AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 16 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT Issaquah SD #411 YEAR 2020 School Site Acquisition Cost: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Student StudentFacilityCost/Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFRElementary7.00 $0 560 0.394 0.226 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High 10.00 $0 850 0.189 0.107 $0 $0High30.00 $0 1,600 0.185 0.128 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Permanent/Total Sq Ft) Student Student%Perm/Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq.Ft.Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 92.37%$36,000,000 560 0.394 0.226 $23,418 $13,416 Middle/Jr High 92.37%$67,000,000 850 0.189 0.107 $13,754 $7,820 High 92.37%$120,000,000 1,600 0.185 0.128 $12,799 $8,852 TOTAL $49,971 $30,088 Temporary Facility Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Temporary/Total Square Feet) Student Student %Temp/Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq.Ft.Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.63%$250,000 80 0.394 0.226 $94 $54 Middle/Jr High 7.63%$250,000 56 0.189 0.107 $64 $37 High 7.63%$250,000 224 0.185 0.128 $16 $11 TOTAL $174 $101 State Matching Credit: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor Student Student Current Area SPI District Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Cost Allowance Footage Match %SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $238.22 90 0.00%0.394 0.226 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High $238.22 108 0.00%0.189 0.107 $0 $0 High School $238.22 130 0.00%0.185 0.128 $0 $0TOTAL$0 $0 Tax Payment Credit:SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $898,063 $399,485 Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.44%2.44% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $7,884,330 $3,507,181 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.74 $1.74 Present Value of Revenue Stream $13,719 $6,102Fee Summary:Single Multi- Family Family Site Acquistion Costs $0.00 $0.00 Permanent Facility Cost $49,970.69 $30,088.03 Temporary Facility Cost $174.11 $101.34 State Match Credit $0.00 $0.00 Tax Payment Credit ($13,718.73)($6,102.49) FEE (AS CALCULATED)$36,426.06 $24,086.87 Local Share $18,213.03 $12,043.43 FINAL FEE $18,213 $12,043 Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee.For the applicable fee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project. SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 17 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • The District previously purchased sites for the new elementary schools, middle school and high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • Elementary $36,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional elementary capacity • Middle School $67,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional middle school capacity • High School $120,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,712,697 Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) 2,518,228 Temporary Square Footage 194,469 STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $238.22 Percentage of State Match 38.99% AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 18 APPENDIX A 2019-20 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS# OF STANDARD CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (20)**# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @100%PERMANENT CAPACITY AT 95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (20)**CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (20)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2020 HeadcountPERMANENT CAP OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @95%***WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95%****APOLLO 28 560 3 36 596 566 7 140 736 699 0 0 736 7 622 -56 77 BRIARWOOD 27 540 2 24 564 536 11 220 784 745 0 0 784 11 683 -147 62 CASCADE RIDGE 21 420 5 60 480 456 8 160 640 608 0 0 640 8 488 -32 120 CHALLENGER 22 440 4 48 488 464 14 280 768 730 0 0 768 14 521 -57 209 CLARK 29 580 5 60 640 608 10 200 840 798 0 0 840 10 792 -184 6 COUGAR RIDGE 26 520 4 48 568 540 8 160 728 692 0 0 728 8 574 -34 118 CREEKSIDE 27 540 4 48 588 559 10 200 788 749 0 0 788 10 721 -162 28 DISCOVERY 27 540 4 48 588 559 8 160 748 711 0 0 748 8 632 -73 79 ENDEAVOUR 28 560 3 36 596 566 12 240 836 794 0 0 836 12 552 14 242 GRAND RIDGE 25 500 4 48 548 521 12 240 788 749 0 0 788 12 670 -149 79 ISSAQUAH VALLEY 31 620 2 24 644 612 10 200 844 802 0 0 844 10 644 -32 158 MAPLE HILLS 20 400 4 48 448 426 4 80 528 502 0 0 528 4 417 9 85 NEWCASTLE 27 540 4 48 588 559 8 160 748 711 0 0 748 8 620 -61 91 SUNNY HILLS 30 600 3 36 636 604 12 240 876 832 0 0 876 12 816 -212 16 SUNSET 31 620 7 84 704 669 4 80 784 745 0 0 784 4 597 71 147 TOTAL 399 7980 58 696 8676 8242 138 2760 11436 10864 0 0 11436 138 9349 -1107 1515 *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs **Average of staffing ratios 1:20 K-2, 1:23 3-5***Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment ****Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount EnrollmentPermanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity.The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables.AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 19 APPENDIX B 2019-2020 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES MIDDLE SCHOOLS# OF STANDARD CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (26)# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 100%PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (26)CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (26)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2020 HeadcountPERMANENT CAP OVERAGE or SHORTAGE @95%**WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95% *** BEAVER LAKE 29 754 3 36 790 751 10 260 1050 998 0 0 1050 10 871 -121 127 ISSAQUAH MIDDLE 31 806 7 84 890 846 8 208 1098 1043 0 0 1098 8 1019 -174 24 MAYWOOD 39 1014 5 60 1074 1020 6 156 1230 1169 0 0 1230 6 1239 -219 -71 PACIFIC CASCADE 28 728 7 84 812 771 8 208 1020 969 0 0 1020 8 1085 -314 -116 PINE LAKE 33 858 6 72 930 884 2 52 982 933 0 0 982 2 1001 -118 -68 TOTAL 160 4160 28 336 4496 4271 34 884 5380 5111 0 0 5380 34 5215 -944 -104 *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs **Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment ***Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity. The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables.AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 20 APPENDIX C 2019-2020 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOLS# OF CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (28)# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 100%PERMANENT CAPACITY @95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (28)CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (28)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2020 HeadcountPERM CAP OVER OR SHORT @95%**WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95%*** ISSAQUAH HIGH 73 2044 4 48 2092 1987 10 280 2372 2253 0 0 2372 10 2202 -215 51 LIBERTY HIGH 39 1092 5 60 1152 1094 8 224 1376 1307 0 0 1376 8 1392 -298 -85 GIBSON EK HIGH 9 252 0 0 252 239 0 0 252 239 0 0 252 0 194 45 45 SKYLINE HIGH 56 1568 5 60 1628 1547 16 448 2076 1972 0 0 2076 16 2008 -462 -36 TOTAL 177 4956 14 168 5124 4868 34 952 6076 5772 0 0 6076 34 5796 -929 -24 The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables. *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs** Headcount Enrollment Compared to Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) *** Headcount Enrollment Compared to Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity.AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 21 APPENDIX D 2019-2020 TOTAL CAPACITIES # OF CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY # OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 100%*PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY @ 100%PORTABLE CAPACITY @ 95%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSOCT. 2020 PROJ. HEADCOUNTPERMANENT CAPACITY @ 95%TOTAL CAPACITY WITH EXISTING PORTABLES @ 95%736 17096 100 1200 18296 17381 206 4596 4366 22892 21747 0 0 22892 206 20361 -2980 1387 *Permanent Capacity is the total Permanent Capacity from Appendix A + Total Capacity from Appendix B + Total Capacity from Appendix C AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 22 APPENDIX E Cost to SECURED UNSECURED BUILDING N/M*2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Complete LOCAL/STATE**LOCAL*** New High School N $32,000,000 $51,000,000 $46,500,000 $16,000,000 $145,500,000 $145,500,000 New Elementary #17 N $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $14,500,000 $5,885,000 $40,385,000 $40,385,000 New Middle School N $29,000,000 $42,000,000 $10,200,000 $81,200,000 $81,200,000 New Elementary #16 N $22,000,000 $24,900,000 $46,900,000 $46,900,000 Expand Maple Hills El M $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Portables N $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 Land N $0 $0 TOTALS $98,000,000 $130,900,000 $71,200,000 $21,885,000 $0 $0 $321,985,000 $321,985,000 $500,000 *N = New Construction M = Modernization/Rebuild **The Issaquah School District, with voter approval, has front funded these projects. ***School impact fees may be utilized to offset front funded expenditures associated with the cost of new growth-related facilities. Impact fees are currently collected from King County, City of Bellevue, City of Newcastle, City of Renton, City of Sammamish and the City of Issaquah for projects within the Issaquah School District. ****Funds for portable purchases may come from impact fees, state matching funds, interest earnings or future bond sale elections. Six-Year Finance Plan AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR KENT, ISSAQUAH, AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND ADOPTING UPDATED SCHOOL IMPACT FEES FOR EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts; and WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts each have requested that the City of Renton adopt their District's current Capital Facilities Plans; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Kent School District have been calculated at $5,554 per single family dwelling unit, and $2,345 per new multi-family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior rates of $5,397 and $2,279, respectively; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Issaquah School District Capital Facilities plan, the school impact fee rates for the Issaquah School District have been calculated at $14,501 per single family dwelling unit, and $9,583 per new multi-family dwelling unit, a decrease from the prior single family rate of $15,276 and an increase from the prior multi-family dwelling rate of $4,399; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Renton School District have been calculated at $6,862 per single family dwelling unit, and $3,582 per new multi-family dwelling unit, a decrease from the prior AGENDA ITEM #2. a) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 2 single family dwelling unit rate of $6,877 and an increase from the prior multi-family dwelling unit rate of $2,455; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton Fee Schedule lists the school impact fee rate charged on behalf of each District; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I.The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans: A. The Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-19 - 2024-25, dated May 2019; B. The 2019 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated May 22, 2019; and C. The 2019 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated May 2019. SECTION II.The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts the following school impact fees, to be effective January 1, 2020, which will be listed in an updated City of Renton Fee Schedule: A. Kent School District: 1. $5,554 per single family dwelling unit; and 2. $2,345 per new multi-family dwelling unit. B. Issaquah School District: 1. $14,501 per single family dwelling unit; and AGENDA ITEM #2. a) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 3 2. $9,583 per new multi-family dwelling unit. C. Renton School District: 1. $6,862 per single family dwelling unit; and 2. $3,582 per new multi-family dwelling unit. SECTION III.Copies of each Capital Facilities Plan adopted herein by reference will be on file with the City Clerk. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _______________________, 2019. ______________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _______________________, 2019. ______________________________ Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: ______________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES:1824:9/9/19 AGENDA ITEM #2. a)