HomeMy WebLinkAboutCapital Improvement Program (1967-1972) Ir
Orin■■
"AA w
7111•001MINNIMPINPNOMMITNIIIV A CIIIIMEADIEO
1 •tk;,blA
1�r�i:�1� --
11 AIL
,viva�‘
III
I
jil
1 litial
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
CITY OF RENTON, WASH. 1987 — 1979
i ',
SIX YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT P •R- O -GRAM
I, ,
FOR THE
CITY OF RENTON-
PROJECT AND PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS
1967 - 1972
RENTON. CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JUNE 1967
The preparation of this report was aided by the Washington Department
of Commerce and Economic Development :-through a Federal Grant from the
Urban Renewal Administration of the Housing and Home, Agency, under the.
Urban Planning Assistance Grant Program authorized, by Section 701 of
the Housing Act of 1954.
i I
•
CITY. COUNCIL
I '
Donald W. Custer, Mayor
Hugh D: Bruce Vern H. Morris
Mrs. Jeanette Dahlquist Henry C. Pedersen.
Charles Delaurenti George- J. .Perry
Avery Garrett Dan. Poli
Glen C. Gianini Henry E. Schellert
Bruce T. Hulse, Jr. Thomas W. Trimm
PLANNING COMMISSION
I Dayle E. Garrison, Chairman
Robert) L. , Brower John C. Sterling
Gerald. J. Cordell Stanley E. Stone
James1E. Denzer Richard M. Stredicke
John Racanello Clark Teegarden
I
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
James L. Magstadt Assistant Planning Director
Delbert F. Moss Assistant Planner
John L. Brown* Planning Technician
Mark E. Brown* Planning Technician
John M. Connell* Planning Technician
Harriet M. Hilder Clerk Stenographer II
•
*Temporary
I i
I �
The preparation of this report was aided by the Washington Department
of Commerce and Economic Development through a Federal Grant from the.
UrbantRenewal Administration of the Housing and Home Agency, under the .
Urban Planning Assistance Grant Program authorized by Section 701 of
the Housing Act of 1954 .
W I
4 O1 -va
ti ,� • 0
(• aI ® '� PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON
a � �
CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON 98055 • ALPINE 5 -3464
-994, •
SAORr CA PITPA-C1F
September 15 , 1967
The Honorable Donald- W. Custer, -Mayor
Members of the City--Council
Renton, ,Washington
Gentlemen and.Mrs. Dahlquist:
We present for your consideration the --1967-72 Capital
Improvement Program. - This -Program defines the :ways by-
which -improvements prompted by.:forces of change- can- be '
met in an orderly-coordinated manner and at the -time - -
they- are actually needed. -- The Capital Improvement Pro-
gram is the -concluding - report for the - Renton Urban. Area -
Comprehensive Plan ' 701' Study.
As you are -aware, --the Plan, .- prepared with -the -assistance -
of . a Federal Urban Planning 'Grant, has -involved the com-
bined- efforts of many groups- and -individuals. The-. John
Graham Company .prepared the--General Development Plan, - .
the , Economic- Report -.and' developed cost - estimates -and
priority - schedules for capital' improvement_s in- the -Cen-
tral Area. - The Planning - Department -.has -been responsible
for coordinating the various _plan proposals into a work
,able - and- desirable Comprehensive :Plan. .
The preparation of the Program has-been -aided greatly
through- the- efforts of many- individuals; - particularly-
by- the -members of the --City Council Capital Improvement -.
Program Priority Committee, . Bruce T. Hulse, _Jr. , Chair
man, and- the -Ways . and Means : Committee -under the ---Chairman-
ship -of Henry E. - Schellert.
The. Planning ' Commission-.and- the Planning - Department - are
appreciative--of_the assi-stance- rendered by'members - of--the
City-Cler--k'.s -staff and by. members :of the Parks and Recre-
'ation and -Engineering - Departments . - Their -cooperation - in -
identifying future Capital Improvements and in preparing
cost estimates has been of especial value -to - this --report'.
In addition, -the -Capital Improvement - section of the John,
,Graham Company' s "Technical- Supplement"- has -been .utilized
in establishing priorities and .estimating:project _.costs -
in- the --Central Area of the -City.
u i I
- I
t
I
Many benefits _can• be secured forthe -community-,through
the timely and systematic planned expenditure of funds
for needed public improvements:: . With . a long range
Capital Improvement Program, _more. equitable means of
capital expenditures to meet the community' s needs.. for
additions and improvements of- arterials and streets ,
sewer and water .systems; public _buildings, :parks and
other public purposes is..more, likely -to occur. The
priority.programming of capital improvements can also
result in more efficient and. effective 'use• of'public
funds and, bring •greater benefits to the community.
It is the -hope of the Planning Commission that the
-
recommendations contained- in' this report will be of
assistance to the City- Council in determining: the
final disposition of the projects listed and to the
public--in general.
Dayle E. _Garrison,
Planning Commission Chairman
Gordon. Y. Ericksen
Planning Director
I
u '
f I ,
'
- II
I i
,
TABLE OF ; CONTENTS
Page
I FOREWORD 2
I2 CCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - PROGRAMMING-- • • 5
,A. Purpose of .Capital Improvement -Program
IB. . Advantages of Capital Improvement-.Programming. 5
C. Capital Improvement Program, and' Its -Relation
to the Comprehensive -Plan • ' ' 7
III ; METHODS OF FINANCING. 9 . .
. IA. Non- Profit- Corporation 9 .
! B. General Obligation -Bonds • • • 9
IC. Revenue Bonds - • 10
D. Local Improvement Districts � . • . 10
.
I E. Urban- Renewal - 0 • ' 10
I F. .Gas Tax- Funds. , ' • 11
1
IV CONSTITUTIONAL LIMIT OF- INDEBTEDNESS - . 13
A. . Statement of Legal Debt ..Limit, - 1966. . • . . 14 :
1B. Statement 'of Legal Debt Limit, - 1967 - • 15
I
V i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS- RECOMMENDATIONS . ' • - 17
A.. Methodology- - • • 17 .
B. Streets - • ' 18 .
C: Water - • 18
' D. . Parks • • • . 18
' I - E. Miscellaneous - . • . 18
' I F. Summary- of Capital Improvements Recommendations. . 19
I G . Streets and Arterials- Recommendations - • 20
H. .Water Department Recommendations 25
1 I. Parks Department Recommendations - 28
J. Miscellaneous Recommendations - - - 31
i ' VIA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE- CBD 34
, A. Summary Proposed CBD .Improvements • . . 36 .
B. .Streets- - • - . . 37
1. Street - Improvements-- . • ' • 38 .
I C: Parking - . - • 40 .
1 1. Summary Off-Street --Parking • , 41 .
I D. Mall. - 46
1. ' Mall- Development Costs - 47 .
1 2.. Mall Summary of Phases . • • • A48
I 3. Mall Development 0 49
VII; FINANCIAL -STATEMENT BY- FUNDS • 151
j A. Current -Expense Fund- - 51
B. Current . Expense Fund Balance Sheet ,52
C. 10-Year ' Comparative Statement 153
D. Statement of Overlapping Debt,. . 1966 . - 153
' E. General Fixed Assets - j54
'
I s
1 I
1 i
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
F. Statement of General Fixed Assets by
Function and Activity, 1966. . . . . . o . . 54
G. Operation of Funds , 1966 . . . . • B • 000 • 0 55
H. Investment Operation, 1966 . . . . . . . . . o . 56
, I. Combined Balance Sheet, 1966 . . . . . . o . . . 57
J. Economic Indices , 1966 58
K. Actual and Projected Increase in Population,
Land Area and Number of Municipal Employees. . 58
a
o
a
W
II
II.
FOREWORD
The City of Renton is situated in King County eleven miles from
Seattle on the southern end of Lake Washington. Renton' s current
population is 23, 066 , which makes it the twelfth largest city in
the State of Washington. Renton is a city of the second class and
has the Mayor-Council form of government. The City was named in
honor of Captain William Renton, one of the area' s early settlers
and leaders . The City was incorporated on September 3, 1901.
The City of Renton has a substantial industrial base in relation
to its total assessed valuation and the size of its population.
In terms of total employment, the four largest industries in Ren-
ton are:
•
a. The Boeing Company, Commercial Airplane Division
b. Pacific Car and Foundry Company
c. Puget Sound Power and Light Company
d. International Pipe and Ceramics Corporation
These four industries account for an annual payroll of over $190
million. The combined assessed valuation of the property owned by
these corporations in Renton amounts to $42 ,418 , 667 , or 56% of the
City' s total assessed valuation. The Boeing Company employs about
35, 000 people at its Renton Plant and Pacific Car and Foundry em-
ploys about 3,000 . The Boeing Company is one of the leading manu-
facturers of commercial and military aircraft, as well as being an
important facto.r.! in the missile and aerospace program. Pacific Car
and Foundry Company produces railroad cars, tanks and Carco winches .
Renton has been growing both in terms of population and physical
size. Prior to World War II, Renton' s population was about 4 , 500 ,
but during the war the Federal Government established community
facilities and housing in Renton for defense workers employed by
the Boeing Company in the production of war planes and other weap-
ons. After the war, growth continued in the aircraft industry due
to the continued production of military aircraft and the transition
to commercial aircraft production.
The area of the City of Renton continues to grow. During the period
from August 7 , 1931 to June 1, 1967 , 73 annexations took place and
the City now includes an area of 13. 8 square miles.
-2-
' I I
It is expected that the development of industrial sites in the valley
south of Renton will create new employment opportunities . Several
industrial parks are within a short. distance of Renton and as.' indus
, I ties move, into these areas, new families will locate within and near
Renton.
I 1
Th!e proximity of Renton to Seattle is another reason for Renton's
continued growth. Many of the residents of Renton are employed in
valrious Seattle businesses. Currently_, work is under:way on a free-
way system that will greatly speed transportation between these two
cities. . With an improved highway system, residential growth.. in
Renton should be accelerated. .
� I
' I I
I I
I' I'
it I
11
I I
I I
-3-
I
I I
I �
'I '
10A
PROGRAMING
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING
Capital improvement programming is the scheduling of public physical
improvements for a community over a certain period of time. The
scheduling, in terms of years, is determined by establishing prior-
ities according to the need, desire or importance of such improve-
ments , and the present and anticipated ability of the community' to
pay for the improvements.
An additional factor that bears upon the scheduling of improvements
is the effect such improvements have upon the annual operating
budget. If additional recreational facilities are to be provided,
for example, provision must be made in the annual budget for the
personnel necessary to maintain and provide recreation leadership.
If the number of fire houses is to be increased, the annual budget
must provide for the proper number of fire companies and equipment
necessary to operate them. The capital improvement program must,
therefore, be closely related to the annual operating budget.
The capital improvement program must also be compatible with the
community master plan and, in effect, becomes a major tool in
implementing the public obligation sector of the master plan.
The Purpose of the Capital Improvement Program
The development of a long range orderly schedule for providing city
improvements with periodic review and revision is the primary pur-
pose of the capital improvement program. This programming becomes
a continuing process, providing annual up-to-date schedules for
improvement projects.
The capital improvement program will provide the City Council and
administration with a method of control over the many variables
related to long range planning. It will provide a long range view
and a means of coordinating capital works with the annual operating
budget so as to allow for the best possible. use of personnel, equip-
ment and funds.
Through this long range planning, the city officials and the "general
public will be furnished with a sense of direction and will be better
able to coordinate proposed improvements with the general growth and
requirements of the community. The program will enable other gov- •
ernmental units and groups also to be aware of proposed city pro-
jects and will be useful in the coordination of capital projects
planned for the area by all jurisdictions . „
Advantages of Capital Programming
Examples of the many benefits to be gained by capital improvement
planning are listed below:
-5-
1. In conjunction with the master plan, capital pro-
gramming provides safeguards against public improve-
ments being misfits and liabilities instead of
community assets .
2. Opportunity is provided to coordinate capital expendi-
tures and debt service with the annual operating
budget. Particularly important is the knowledge of
increased annual operating costs that will arise from
proposed projects .
3. Timing of projects allows the City to make the best
use of available personnel and equipment and provides
for the proper scheduling of related projects or
activities.
4. Programming stabilizes the volume of public improve-
ments at a reasonably uniform level.
5. Opportunity is provided to purchase land or equipment
needed in advance when costs may be more favorable at
a savings to the taxpayers. This aids in assuring
that projects are not undertaken before the need
arises nor after the land costs are inflated.
6 . Less chance exists for impetuous action by a momentary
wave of popular enthusiasm that may have adverse effects
on the general City program. A long range plan reduces
the likelihood of pressure group influence.
7 . It makes the plans available to all departments and to
other governmental agencies, private utilities and
other public groups so that informed decisions can be
made and, where practical, joint programs can be
initiated.
8 . The City will be able to take better advantage of
federal and state grants-in-aid when plans are pre-
pared well in advance and matching money is made
available.
9 . It enables the City to secure public support and ac-
ceptance and a higher degree of voter approval when
bond financing is necessary. A long range program can
foster civic pride, inspire public confidence in the
orderly progress of the City, and encourage participa-
tion by citizens in their municipal government,
10. The program also provides an opportunity to establish
reserves and schedule bond issues , if needed, and to
take advantage of favorable changes in the money market.
-6-
THE CAPITAL ' IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AND ITS RELATION TO THE COMPREHENSIVE . PLAN
•
The -last phase of the ' 701' Comprehensive Study is the- adoption
of the Capital Improvement Program. This Program, . possibly the
most vital element of • the ' 701' Study, defines the ways by which
the improvements and recommendations proposed. by the ' 701' Study
are financed in an orderly and coordinated manner.
The coordination of the ' 701' Comprehensive Plan Study and the
Capital Improvement •Program is vital in assuring that the - imple-
mentation -of this Program is realistically effectuated. ' Thee
Comprehensive Plan is used as a constant guide =for the proposal
and coordination of future Capital Improvement Program items:
-7-
ZEIIINII
S
0
nnnrivr-i
..,,in
A. R NEWAL
METHODS OF FINANCING
METHODS OF FINANCING
The determination of the financing method for a proposed improve-
ment is basic to its attainment. The method selected is dependent
on a number of influences , including: the type of improvement; the
financial capability of the City; the question of benefit or area
served; the possibility of federal or state participation in the
project; as well as other factors . In view of these influences ,
financing of a particular project may involve only one or a com-
bination of methods . The general practice has also been one where
the cost of an improvement is spread out over a number of years ,
thus enabling an individual, group or city to pay for sizeable im-
provements in annual increments . Potential methods for the finan-
cial implementation of the new Renton Central Business District Plan
are reviewed on the following pages.
NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
A voluntary association of businessmen_ and property owners
could be formed to develop Renton Plaza totally or by
stages. This corporation could be formed as a non-profit
organization and consequently be tax free.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
These bonds are usually issued to finance capital improve-
ments which benefit the whole municipality.
The interest and principal payments on these bonds are
guaranteed by the municipality or the taxing district
issuing the bonds.
Annual tax levies are made on all taxable property within
the municipality in order to meet the bond amortization
payments.
The General Obligation Bond debt which a municipality may
incur is limited by State Constitution.
Without Voter Approval - Bonded debt may be incurred
up to 1-1/20 of the assessed valuation of taxable
property.
With Voter Approval - Voters may authorize bonded
debt in an amount up to 10% of the assessed value
of taxable property (plus an additional amount
representing up to 10% of the value of municipal
public utilities) .
-9-
Favorable vote from 60% of those voting is required.
Voter participation must equal 40% of those voting
in that general election or the last general election
should the bond issue not be voted on during a general
election.
The interest these bonds bear is low since the entire
municipality is obligated and guarantees the payments .
REVENUE BONDS
These bonds are issued to finance capital improvements that
have a direct monetary return from the improvement. This
may include water, sewage, parking or toll facilities.
The interest and principal payment on these bonds are guar-
anteed by the revenue, earnings , or taxes from that specific
facility. They do not constitute a general obligation on
the taxing district.
The bonds are a lien on the revenues received from the pro-
ject or activities so financed.
Revenue bonds do not require voter approval but may be voted
upon by the City Council.
The interest rate on these bonds tends to be higher than
General Obligation Bonds.
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Local Improvement Districts (LID) can be established to
finance capital expenditures of special benefit to a portion
of a taxing district.
The interest and principal of these LID bonds are paid by
property assessment in relation to the benefit derived from
the improvement.
The assessment constitutes a lien on the property.
Local approval of 60% of the affected property owners is
required.
City government may support an LID by contributing toward
the cost of the facility; thereby reducing the interest
rate of the bonds.
dl
i itl
-10-
I
URBAN RENEWAL.
Urban Renewal is a local program aided by federal participa-
tion to prevent or correct blight and decay.
The city must develop a workable program committing the city
to the attainment of specific objectives.
Urban Renewal is principally a land acquisition and
structural rehabilitation project.
The net project cost of an Urban Renewal project in Renton
would be paid 75% by federal funds , 25% by local contribu-
tions.
Local contributions may include non-cash credits for the
value of contributed local property, demolition and
utilities to the degree they benefit the project.
Local property owners in the project can, without relin-
quishing ownership, participate in the Urban Renewal Project.
GAS TAX FUNDS
This source of revenue is broken down into two categories
--Arterial Gas Tax Funds and Regular Gas Tax Funds.
Arterial Gas Tax Funds are allocated to the City from the
State on a per capita basis , determined yearly, and must be
used only for the construction of arterial streets . $3. 65
per capita will be allocated for 1968.
Regular Gas Tax Funds are allocated to the City from the
State on a per capita basis , determined yearly, and go to
the Street Fund for maintenance and operation of streets..
$5. 32 per capita has been allocated for 1968.
-11-'
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMIT
OF INDEBTEDNESS
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMIT OF INDEBTEDNESS
Cities are limited to a tax rate of. 15 mills on assessed valuation
for general purposes. In addition, cities may levy up to 1 mill
additional for Firemen' s Pension Fund, authorized by Legislative
Act in 1947. There is no limitation for debt service on bonded
debt voted by the people.
The City may become indebted in an amount not to exceed 5% of its
actual value (twice the assessed) for. general purposes, and a like
amount for water, light and sewer purposes by vote of. the electors .
Actual value is twice the amount of assessed valuation since the
statutory, basis of assessment is 50%. An indebtedness equivalent
to 1-1/2% of the assessed valuation of the City may be authorized
by ordinance without a vote of the people, but this is within the
maximum 5% of actual value limit for general purposes.
Revenue supported debt is not considered ,a debt of the munici-
pality subject to the above debt limitations .
-13-
STATEMENT OF LEGAL DEBT LIMIT
4ECEMBER U1, 1966
Assessed Valuation 82 , 865, 888. 00
I COUNCIL LIMITS
1-1/2% of Assessed Valuation 1,242 , 988. 00
Add:
Delinquent Taxes 215, 491. 27
Total Capacity - Limited General
Obligation 'Bonds' 1,458 , 479 .27
II BY 3/5 VOTE OF THE PEOPLE
. 5% of Full Property- Valuation '
(Twice Assessed) 8,286 ,588. 80
Add:
Delinquent Taxes 215 ,491. 27
Less:
Outstanding Bonds 600 ,000. 00
Total Capacity - Unlimited General
Obligation' Bonds • 7 , 902 , 0,80.-07
III FOR UTILITY PURPOSES BY
3/5 VOTE OF PEOPLE
5% of Full Property Valuation
(Twice -Assessed) 8 , 286, 588. 80
Less :
Water & Sewer General
Obligation Bonds Out-
standing-
- Total General Obligation Bond
Capacity , of Utility Purposes 8 ; 286 , 588. 80
Ratio of Direct Debt to Assessed Valuation 74%
-14-
STATEMENT OF 1EC�AL DEBT -LIMIT
FOR THE YEAR 1967
Assessed' Valuation 116 ,000 ,037.1)0
I COUNCIL -LIMITS
1-1/2% of Assessed Valuation} .- 1,740,000 . 00
Add:
Delinquent Taxes 25,98991
Less :
Bonds Outstanding--
1967 Issue 1;500000 00
Total Capacity - Limited Genera
Obli .
gation Bonds 265989. 91
II. BY-;3/5 VOTE OF TOTE PFQI?LE
5% Of 'Full, ProPer-ty Va .uatign 1],,6Q0 ,004. 00
Add:
Delinquent Taxes 25,989. 91
Less :
, Bonds Outstanding � ,100 ;Q00. 00
Total ,Capacity - Unlimited General'
Obligation 'fonds • 9 ,525,1993. 91i
III - FOR UTILITY. PURPOSES BY •
3/51VOTE OF PEOPLE
5% of Fall Property- Va1uatiQn 11,6.09004, 0Q
Less:
I No Outstanding Bonds --*
Total I.General Obligation Bond
Capacity for Utility Purposes 11,600, 004. 00
' I
. I
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS
DEPT. ' FINANCING 1967 1968 1969TOTALS
Street GOB 6, 500, 000 750, 000 785, 000 730, 000 8, 765, 000
State
Hiway 635, 000 I 635 , 000
Arterial •
Street 172, 000 180,000- 30 , 000 7, 000 389, 000
Budget 99 , 000 116, 000 167 ,000 65,000 100, 000 547, 000
•Water {VF,S Rev.
I T
Bonds 140, 000 140, 000
Budget 85, 000 170, 000 170, 000 190 , 000 150, 000 , 170, 000 935, 000
Park State-Fed.
Matching j
Funds 490, 000 j 490 , Q00
GOB 178,000 289, 000 199 , 000 240, 000 319, 379 1 1 , 225, 379
Budget 152 , 161 56, 323 1 208, 484
-
Misc. - GOB 2,325,000 200, 000 2, 525, 000
Limited
GOB 1 , 500,000 100 , 000 1, 600, 000
Budget 125, 000 50, 000 175, 000
TOTALS 2 , 763, 161 9, 619, 000 1 ,406,000 1 ,446, 000 1 , 855, 000 545, 702 17 , 634 , 863
_ J
Department: STREETS AND ARTERIALS
Year--
and Est. State Arterial
Project Cost GOB Hiway Street Budget
1967:
1. Rainier Ave. Trf. Signal Imprv. 60,000 X
2. Rebuild Trf. Signal-2nd & Wells 4, 000 X
3. Rebuild Trf. Signal--6th
& Logan 4,000 X
4. Rebuild Trf. Signal--"H" &
Sunset 4 ,000 X
5. Rebuild Trf. Signal--2nd &
Williams 3,000 X
6. Rebuild Trf. Signal--3rd & Wells 3,000 X
7. Rebuild Trf. Signal--N. 6th & Park 5,000 X
8. Trf. Signal--12th N. & Sunset 12,000 X
9. Trf. Signal--Talbot & Puget Dr. 12,000 X
10. Trf. Signal--ll6th & Sunset 14 ,000 X
11. N. 3rd St.-N. 4th St.--One-Way
System 100,000 X
12. Storm Sewer Improvements 50,000 X
271,000
1968 :
13. Revise Signal--3rd & Mill 5,000 X
14. Revise Signal--Airport & Logan 8 ,000 X
15. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Logan 5,000 X
16. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Factory 4,000 X
17. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Garden 4,000 x
18. Cont. Signal System to Conform 30,000 X
19. Resurface Grady Way 80,000 X
20. Widen Garden, 4th to 8th 70,000 x
21. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
- - --22.--Logan-Smither-s-Major-- Arterial - 3,250,000 X —
23. N. 3rd St. Major Arterial . 3,250 ,000 X
24. Houser Way-N. 3rd to N. 4th 40 ,000 X
6,796,000
Department: STREETS AND ARTERIALS (continued)
Year
and Est. State Arterial
Project Cost GOB Hiway Street Budget
1969:
25. Trf. Signal--Wells & Houser Way $ 6 , 000 X
26. Trf. Signal--Grady Way & Main 15,000 X
27. Trf. Signal--N. 4th & Pelly 6 ,000 X
28. Trf. Signal--Bronson & Garden 20,000 X
29. Main to Mill Transition 500,000 X
30. Cont. Signal System to conform 30,000 X
31. Resurface N. 6th--Logan to Garden 70 ,000 X
32. Improve Storm Sewer System 50 ,000 X
33. Connection--Sunset to N. 4th 250 ,000 X
947,000
1970:
Revise Signal--7th & Rainier 7,000 X
35. Trf. Signal--2nd & Burnett 15,000 X
36. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
_ 37. Widen & Lower Undercrossing--
Shattuck Street 150,000 X
38. Widen Puget Dr. to Pipe Line 200,000 X
39. Widen 116th S.E. to Freeway 300 ,000 X
40. 90th Ave. S.--Renton Ave. to
88th P1. S. 75,000 X
41. 88th P1. S.--90th to N. City Lim. 60,000 X
857,000
1971:
42. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
43. Talbot--Grady to Puget Dr. 35,000 X
44. Lake Ave.--Airport to 2nd 50,000 X
45. Langston--Sunset to City Limits 100,000 X
46. Interchange--Talbot & Grady 600 ,000 X
47 . "M" St.--4th N. to Sunset, 150 ,000 X
48. 12th Ave. N.--116th to Sunset 80 ,000 X
49 . 132nd S.E.--4th N. to Sunset 200,000 X
50. Wells Ave. Bridge Replacement 200,000 X
1,465, 000
1
1 , • .
I • . . . .
,•
/ I 1::::;.
r - [, ,
• . : ,
, -11. • .
'.1_I/
STREETS Eis. Alp '
— ---71-- .. --1
: I
ARTERIALS . .:
• , 1 .
1 A•
,. . . .
l .. 14,
W —
i
I .....c..‘ al
111.1.11\ . ', •
' \ .\. .•.:
-..,‘
rt• LAKE ,
MIN 1„... .,ilmi I-
,
74FJ.,.•_•_•_.\.',
WASHINGTON ' En . ...,... :_:•1,,
I
1 \ VAu,:al 4:1 ii., . - _ _
, 1 I Alkihinge
- • -,"\r" Iling KIV
I h limm=s Eril .=_,...,/'
=, ,aiimii .1111-ret t
wok- ,- ,114 EI.....
Calr'l 011 lir
_ I \\BOEING 110111101 miT': -.......1 ,_,_•
....,
, 1 \ LIIIIII0 Hu CM
HU Eilli
tqt#1111 "Sq. i
: 1 li 'yr Alion.
11 1 itp/4. 4114 ., \ , "obi .,,c.. /i-_igli NVI i!
limn - ,it, 'drMil
----17 ----EL lrgb.11) WI I v , - ina..V/ C-----
, . •:
( N IkImmill„.km..- liklirpoL III r.t, i ;- -ellIPM
.._.... .. ,.
1 ° -'-41-11 I4rl4it14it"k4---,rit ft---.,71) Ille. % I,.
E ,I . '
%.1
•i / .. •
I\
_I \
' ni '‘\. ...011001•01:01101 ''' ' . .:: . .1 . * , ,
•,, , til , ,
:I,a„I.iiiil \-/licii---momm' -.' rallii. - . .. • • ,. -- ---N 1
i V I-1te ii r \\_..4 ',.2 .,.. .‘ _s•-_-/-‘ . •
I -fk'r I )
11. Afili...... ... . _
,.. — -
I ' •
llir I c .
1 1 : -, , 11F%- '''. ..- , 1 , .
--1
t
, • . ,
r‘ i. IIILS
1 : '‘, • '• ,
) .
__ '. „.......1_
.• ,
1 I / mai Ai .,\ '.1 /
-
41
)1 A .
1 1 \ I ' . .
1 _
. ..
•
r\.:.•
1 I
-.-_ -
--_-__./
,.
_
I
I e -
) !r -
•,,,.... ..
..
•.. 1
1 , , LAKE
YOUNGS 1 .
I /
I . •, .
L—L— —— — --,_L__. ...s.„ _ 1 I
.•
.,
•
., •.
1 .
. ,
I TI ��(�(\j\l
1 t Z I _ /�/ 4c \ :
�Y�7 sl ll �L 'ON ,i I •; I
I • 1
j 1', 1
f • 1` 1. '1
, - -----1,.., , ' A•n, ..7c—L:
?—r 'L
• t �, , .
'
- . ,
it
‘t , 1
I
: ._.
_ �, 1 I
- •° 1 BOEING . , ,
°Ia.
ill _ ° ,,_
0:)
3 7 1,7 li‘0
i1 1 Ilb
' �
_ ; 'AC. CAR / 'J • i
1 \ 15 jI7 . I i
• • „._._. . AirrilenisoitiponkIkV/1 r ii ,/,„;,/,',' , ,
. ,y 14 . ` `/ •, //
1 ! r
_ _ _ AIRPORT WAY ._._._. //%/
° WWAY �/, 1, i�/ I w
4 /
R.�--- , `, 1 [------------------
3J 2=A AVE ilit ,�A_ �I 1I04� ` ,, I , 1 I I T
I
'- N_ II��Ji I � 140h ,„ ,
1 F�4,
1 1_
I illiir=j11111 \,
,,,,ss, . I .. -, (‘-`,‘,, 4141 /N 4 I ,//'
!PP \\
i�i t. 6..._._._. . i� -itI i`
ow-
I LL \", -
Y _
,s.
Ain. ,,. , , s‘
.,,‘ . s‘ ,!...L._Il
, , __ ,,,
., :, ,.,...„ , \s,:. i, • ,.,,
0.• .
. • .. ,
\ .1, \‘;‘,:„
I Di
•
•
,,s,, . ss. ,
\ • ‘,, ,
! •
•
•
i •
.......„___
•
,..,..... __
,,,‘ .___
, ,
...,..„..„,,:_,,.,,‘ ,,
;_.
_, (- I ''''''",;\\* *
1 c,`
1 I
•
1
•
ti.;. .
IL A IN.t, rs. x . .\J /�' fl
\ i
f i1 , . .Ili" !i , i
J, ` I i
lax ! i___ ....\ ," \i‘ iiii. ,
,in
„, 114 1 r,,,,
` * '-'—'—''' \\, „ , riiik, iif
‘ . ,..
M_H II,1 ‘ , •
n1, .. ,‘
; 1
?'i 1 \BOEINGrill ' 1
I ... \,, 14 lirill, , f 1,_.,
I.
1 II�' •I ,ItiVrtil
de14\ 111‘.11))
I 1
_•_ _ PAC. (-npI t I, 1 �, , FOUND. I Iis - ®, i 411
`
1 i.1 '" II lin „ \ ,,,
! I�� .IR7C2T WAY .� 50 7,l ,\� �1�_'_•_•_�_+ ,i , ' •, •tri
,\ \s,VI 3.6 IlitV /A I ; I,/ '
3 WI AYE.I.ft.....i,—. , . --.81,01,. 1I,111
F 1
NO -21%, .
�C� \...\,,,\1 Y\,,\\,,.„„\,
1
\1,,1\0\‘,,\\r
1ri 113.1 1ii2- 51 - Id
I r 11..,,,,s\'s:•,•,, „ . ; •
wm—
11 1 1
_ 7 _ 26 ,,,,:,.
1 , .
.,,/,,,,,.
11
111111101111111 ; ,
/ /1‘.. i ' 017 .
11111iPP
, •:,,,,, ,,,‘,.\‘‘ • :*: l. 's
__:‘,_s----_------:IL \\----
,
1I " ,.,,1
1
a \i „
1
•4114
li \ ',, AO: .
1 1 f t
. .,
pi . .
s \
‘, ‘.
I. Eli • `‘,,, , . , .,,,,,
I , . :
i e��.e ,
.,..,„,
C " '
l I III I
Department: WATER - - - - -
Year W&S
and Est. Rev.
Project Cost Bonds Budget
1967:
1. 12" & 16" Main in 132nd S.E. from
N. 4th to Heather Downs $ 40,000 X
2. Booster Pump Station, Talbot, 1st Stage 40,000 X
3. Cover two Talbot Hill Reservoirs 50,000 X
4. 16" Main--Talbot to Benson Hill 45,000 X
5. Reserve--Rolling Hills Reservoir 50,000 X
225,000
1968:
6. 12" Main--Maple Valley Highway 30,000 X
7. Exploratory Drilling--Cedar River
Alluvial Fan 60,000 X
8. Sites for new Wells 10,000 X
9. Reserve for Rolling Hills Reservoir 70,000 X
170,000
1969:
10. 16" Main, Williams & N. 3rd--Tobin
to Garden Ave. 40,000 • X
11. Rolling Hills Reservoir-- (120,000. in
reserve) 80,000 - X
12. 16" Main--12th N. "E" St. to Highlands
-- _ Reservoir 50,000 X
170,000 -- -- ---
Department: WATER (continued)
Year W&S
and Est. Rev.
Project Cost Bonds Budget
1970:
13_- New Wells--Tobin & Burnett $ 60,000 X
14. 24" Main--Talbot Reservoirs to west -
side of Valley Freeway 80,000 X
15. 12" Main--Rainier Ave. Tobin St. to
North City Limits 50,000 X
190,000
1971:
16. 16" Main, S.E. 112th-"E" St. to 112th S.E.
& 16" Main, 112th S.E.-S.E. 112th to
S.E. 100th 72,000 X
17. 10" Main, 13th Ave. S.-Talbot Reservoir
to Shattuck 0 8,Q00 X
18. Reserve for Talbot Reservoir 70,000 X
150,000
1972:
19. Reserve for Talbot Reservoir 70,000 X
20. Booster Pump Station-lst stage 4th N.
& "M" St. 30,000- X
21. New Well-7th & Rainier 70,000 X
170,000
i
„e „I I
I \
;., 1I'
11 WATER ,,n„
- - - -
,„, _I : _ ih,
iii.gm
.., ice ; •
\,.. .. ii
ri
\. LAKE ■ I
�' _ 1 i 41NWASHINGTON 'a '/��_,; ___I
. l 11 IMI el _ —
L
1e
��
____, , ' \* rAOP i ilo:.. • clii i
IM4614 11111 '
.11 BOF NG 1
- . hgb fill os
)11.
, Vero, ......, • ,J ,
N mow
y, . 'Mara Ili - ;Pr
' !
,.,j II._
s•• '. — . 1�4' $ UUP - �I T 1
•. ��,� '' 414$711
/ : —7— —— ! ---jam
\ 1 itior iiiii ,-
y — ---------- i
I( ...._
(� .;�� . A Tom:=:
. ►.1 1.r IA 1
!, `) 'f I •
- —I —
_ ,i'► i {
V
/ \ .
LAKE
l 51 I I YOUNGS
II •
— i 'Fi
I 1 : • \\\),
Department:- PARK
Year "State-Fed.
and Est. Matching
Project Cost Funds GOB Budget
1967:
1. Lake Washington Beach, Development $450 ,000 X
2. Cedar River Park, Development*
3. Liberty Park Grandstand 148,161 X
598,161
1968:
4. Highlands Playfield & Pool, Dev. 88,000** X
5. Cascade Park, Acquisition 40,000 X
6. Sierra Heights Park, Acquisition 50,000 X
7. Talbot Hill Park, Development 99,352 X
277,352
1969 :
8. Kiwanis Park, Development 67,754 X
9. Earlington Playground, Acquisition 40, 000 X
10. Lake Washington Beach Addn, Acquisition 150,000 X
11. Kennydale Park Addition, Acquisition 40,000 X
12. Tiffany Park, Acquisition 4,000 X
301,754
1970:
13. Philip Arnold Park, Development 79,379 X
14. Heather Downs Park, Acquisition 90,000 X
15. Maplewood Playground, Development 30,000 X
199,379
Department: PARK (continued)
Year State-Fed.
and Est. Matching
Project Cost Funds GOB Budget
1971:
16. Hazelwood Park, Acquisition $ 40,000 X
17. Windsor Hills, Development 32 ,000 X
72,000
1972:
18. Honeydew Park, Acquisition 40,000 X
19. Nelsen Playfield, Acquisition 40,000 X
80,000
* Est. Cost and Funding information not available
** Not including swimming pool
•
,-- •
1 .
. ,
1 1
,if i . • i
, ; ..is
. . r ki
i
_. __.
,s, i_,,
•
i
\\( . .•
,
/,,,,,.„A
PARKS
, I,
. N,
I 1 It ..' • I !
i • ----).• '--"... :k, . 1 1
.
1 ,
; 1 • I
\.,• 11111111 (1. ' I.,, .
r 1
...,
1 qipollik
WASHING 0IMEaMI
a .../A;A_Ie 1...:••• . isk..4 ' , " mai Aslik..:. 1 .._...... ..._.__op_ _ _....__._..._ ._-_--
1 •_,. E.
MMIIIIIM OM IMMO. \ AA \ arillilffir Tar
Mil . .
, •'.:.' , h 1111i111.1=1„"7..*. \ rerli-.0. 411111111r4ts i
:j: LI 1 9014KIN NIUE\. I'I\i 1 raillrAPIliFirk‘ ...
... I I \ E. fffillifsfp.....a.. --.3 •. :' ,
. .
11111111/ )411 1:1— • \''',
\ \ ' ..411rosialillinvic
' Alil _iLlig IIII-"—°
1 \ 11
AditarbS.6 7411,. _ 14A
!
•
•-•16., ,--4.....16L --'-- IIi' '' \ ' IIIIIIIILeaP;Ak4r-I• - '7.-- ., .
,,
l'---'! .:\ '.11111*-fitvinftjill ,11 :*stv. , A T
--
' • r--
. • : -
if.._-7---Alkark&TO .191 mini ii ,Iiiiii I .
I f ---\-----=‘0 awl m
/
; ,....,.. ....,.
1 ...-_ .._17:T..— r Jwl - .. ........L__.........7...._ __ ,. . -
,. ---- --, .. - --. --.--- ------ El,
./ .
1 1 ! -.' --•.1"?.---4111111-1. -- ' • . . ' .. y -..zo,..„---------,
• 1 , .7.-- o
„---- • y.,........-lini MIMI -4,._ .'.:. ' . lik .. - . .. \
i ,v1F. Aiii.,' r 74 • :. ., . :„.,
--- .40,......... ix: ., IN rAII r 11 yr . .i. • I
-.4,11k. •••••-.., - -
__ . 1 •WI
c
. .
- - ilit T191..
l ill *: ,i..
1 1.............. f .- au .• eh i .
t .
ill .
•..
.,.
. ...
i I
1 1
i ...........p.....“ .., ..,
A . ...a.
aft ..: ...,. I ..,
..
a
" .
!
\\):„„....71/A-I LI ...,..7. , ..
..
.
..
.,. .
• .
•:.
1 i ell I I' ...,
1 , i
i sr
1
.
1 i 1.e-" Ji
..
::•.-- C .
•
1 a ..,..., a _.,„....,-....n...----
------
• ••..,III
I
/ .b.
I LAKE
•i.:,
YOUNGS
I •
••. .
• ... ,i.
I . .
. .
. .
I
. .
•
—1 oil
Je ...... .... ...._
...__ ...__ . ....
-
Department: MISCELLANEOUS
Year
and Est. Limited
Project Cost GOB GOB Budget
1967:
City Hall & furnishings (includes
Data Processing equipment) $1,415,000 X
2. Underground wiring--Civic Center 50,000 X
3. Landscaping--Civic Center site 35,000 X
4. Fire Site #3--Development 35,000 X
5. Training Site Facilities &
Development 75,000 X
$1,625,000
1968:
6. City Garage & Shops 100,000 X
7. Fire Station #3 125,000 X
8. Highlands Branch Library 100,000 X
9. Relocation Burnett Ave. RR Tracks 1,600,000 X
10. Downtown Parking Facilities 500,000 X
11. P.S. Regional Transportation Study
& P.S. Governmental Conference 50,000 X
$2,475,000
1970:
Z2. Airport Storm Sewer Project 200,000 X
.4n
I I
I „,,. 1 :t\,. • •— • -.II .
MISCELLANEOUS `� — — — • j
PROJECTS _ E.
, `� LAKE ,l ■IM . AI -J
a ' �, WASHINGTON 1 • 1.� / -._ -
is _Y 4 " Mill AIM 1* ' ' Z
I3 :"._ � �. ."" —�i i• � 1��roing=to r'
r 11 ' .
1 1 \ b ICI viir..,,,..ilot -- x i........ 1��� r 1 9IIIIIt CPR �� kJ I . I '
I
Am
, ... N.,' iplionv
'1 ( 1 , _ r� i,, r� ,_.._._.if w
' C�i
,..,.-.,--'':?\ lti ll E —,
.: d 1 .. \ • • tir fir �3 c
ri -
i.
ilit Piimpr III - _w"•.• I
e
le - i ,
, , , _ . __
MI ‘_111 iiiiiu..,-1 , .
iriI I '''sal-- i •
__ Ai 1 l k .
1 1
.,
1 1. ,4
_ri 11 .. A A I .
.. .] - ,
I 1 i , .
/1/11
i 11 \
S .i
I ; ! I I o K),YOUNICIS_iLA
i .
I
Li_ i!— — L
0.741 .IIIII II I I
II
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
i
r J ,
METHODOLOGY
The Capital Improvement program represents a judicious selection
of projects balanced as to effects on - business and benefits to
Rentpn residents. In developing - a long range Capital Improvement
Prog;'ram, :.all . City- departments present their requests for capital
improvement projects .based on need and urgency of the proposals ,
, 'I establishing specific . priorities for each. These projects are then
scheduled over . a six-year period. Programming must take into ac
count the following basic considerations :
1. Cost. of the-- proposed projects must be -related- to the
financial resources through careful financial planning.
2. Projects must be selected on the basis of over-all
1 community need.
i
' , 3. Flexibility must be provided if the- program is to be
realistic - and of continuing value.
Guides 'that,-have been established for selecting- the priorities in
Capital - Improvements programming are -as. follows:.
I .
j ;1. Will the-project -contribute to the -protection of life
and property and to the conservation- of City resources?
2 . - What is the relationship of the project to the -welfare,
growth-and. progress of the entire City?
3-. How-will the citizens be affected by, the project? How
j j many will be -benefited or harmed if- the -project is .o'r
11 is- not carried out? •
1
4 . Will it replace an outworn facility -or is it a new
venture?
5. Will the improvement reduce or increase- operating- costs?
I6. Will the - project add to the value -of the -area and in-
crease the -valuation of- private . property? -
7. What social, - cultural and aesthetic values will be 'en-
hanced by the project? .
i
1 8. Is its estimated cost -within the City' s ability to ;pay?
1 '
9 . Can the service provided. by the impFovement .be --more
j , reasonably provided. by private enterprise- or by another
I I public agency? -
The Capital Improvement priorities have -been -broken- down into vari-
ous sub-categories--Streets , -Water, Park and Miscellaneous. Two
j of these : categories, Streets and Miscellaneous , .have priorities
j . , .
-17-
I
,
1
that are submitted by more than one department. The Streets cate-
gory involves projects submitted by Engineering, Traffic Engineer-
ing and the Street Department, Most of these projects are inter-
related and are the resultof a joint cooperation among departments.
STREETS
The rebuilding of traffic signals, installation of storm sewers , re-
surfacing of arterials , widening and lowering undercrossings and
bridge replacement are a few ofthe projectsundertaken in this
category; Costs for' 1968 are substantially greater than the other
projected years due to the widening and resurfacing of Logan-Smithers
and North 3rd, Street. These two projects combined will be installed
at an estimated cost of -$6 ,500 ,000 and are to be financed through -
General Obligation Bonds.
WATER
The Water . Department hasbased its priorities on the , estimation- of
future system demands so as to provide a logical basis for provid-
ing major system facilities of supply, _ storage and trunk mains.
These facilities aredesigned to produce .and distribute a given
quantity ofwater and the actual system demand which occurs dictates
the facilities required. The- construction of these additional facil-
ities must be timed accordingly. A certain flexibility in the
priorities has been provided to handle adequately future service
to all areas withineconomic limits. You will note that a certain
amount of exploration drilling has been. projected. In 1968 explora-
tory drilling in the Cedar River alluvial fan will be undertaken and
also a study will be made for potential sites for new wells in- 1968;
the drilling of a new well at Tobin and Burnett in 1970 ; and the
proposal of a new well at 7th and Rainier in 1972. It is hoped
'that these additionalwells will help relieve the increased water
demand in those, areas.
PARKS
Major projectslisted are -the -development - of the Lake Washington
Beach at a cost of $450 , 000 in 1967; the acquisition of Lake Wash-
ington Beach Addition in 1969 ; Heather Downs Park Addition in 1970.
These proposed park acquisitions are in line with the Community
Facilities Report as developed by the Planning Department as part
of the ' 701' Program. The timing of these acquisitions was devel-
oped by the proposed population expansion in these respective areas.
MISCELLANEOUS
Noteworthy in this category is the construction of the City Hall
including furnishings and data processing equipment in 1967 at a
total cost of $1, 415, 000® Another major project is the relocation
of Burnett Avenue railroad tracks in 1968 for a total cost. of
$1, 600 , 000. This category includes other items that need to be
projected in order to achieve better coordination among proposed
priorities.
-18-
1
•
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS
DEPT. FINANCING 1967 1968 1969 I 1970 1 1971 1972 1 I TOTALS
Street GOB 6, 500, 000 750, 000 785 ,000 730, 000 8 , 765, 000
State
Hiway 635, 000 635, 000
Arterial
Street 172, 000 180,000 30,000 7, 000 389, 000
Budget 99 , 000 116, 000 167,000 65,000 100, 000 547, 000
Water W&S Rev.
Bonds 140,000 140, 000
Budget 85, 000 170, 000 170, 000 190,000 150, 000 170,000 935, 000
Park State-Fed.
Matching
Funds 490, 000 490 , 000
GOB 178,000 289, 000 199 , 000 240, 000 319, 379 1 , 225, 379
Budget 152, 161 56, 323 208, 484
Misc. GOB 2,325,000 200, 000 2, 525, 000
Limited
GOB 1 , 500,000 100, 000 1 , 600,000
Budget 125,000 50, 000- 175,-000
TOTALS 2 , 763, 161 9, 619 , 000 1 ,406,000 1 ,446, 000 1 ,855, 000 545, 702 17 , 634 , 863
Department: STREETS AND ARTERIALS
Year
and Est. State Arterial
Project Cost GOB Hiway Street Budget
1967:
1. Rainier Ave. Trf. Signal Imprv. 60,000 X
2. Rebuild Trf® Signal-2nd & Wells 4 , 000 X
3. Rebuild Trf. Signal--6th
& Logan . 4 ,000 X
4. Rebuild Trf. Signal--"H" &
Sunset 4 ,000 X
5. Rebuild Trf. Signal--2nd &
Williams 3, 000 X
6. Rebuild Trf. Signal--3rd & Wells 3,000 X
7. Rebuild Trf. Signal--N. 6th & Park 5,000 X
8. Trf. Signal--12th N. & Sunset 12,000 X
9, Trf. Signal--Talbot & Puget Dr. 12 ,000 X
10. Trf. Signal--116th & Sunset 14 ,000 X
11. N. 3rd St.-N. 4th St.--One-Way ,
System 100,000 x
12. Storm Sewer Improvements 50,000 X
271,000
1968 :
13. Revise Signal--3rd & Mill 5,000 X
14. Revise Signal--Airport & Logan 8,000 X
15. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Logan 5, 000 X
16. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Factory 4,000 X
17. Revise Signal--N. 4th & Garden 4,000 X
18. Cont. Signal System to Conform 30,000 X
19. Resurface Grady Way 80,000 X
20. Widen Garden, 4th to 8th 70,000 X
21. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
22. Logan-Smithers Major Arterial 3,250,000 X
23. N. 3rd St. Major Arterial 3,250 ,000 X
24. Houser Way-N. 3rd to N. 4th 40 ,000 X
6,796 ,000
Department: STREETS AND ARTERIALS (continued)
Year - -
and Est. State Arterial
Project Cost GOB Hiway Street Budget
1969:
25. Trf. Signal--Wells & Houser Way $ 6 ,000 X
26. Trf. Signal--Grady Way & Main 15, 000 X
27. Trf. Signal--N. 4th & Pelly 6,000 X
28. Trf. Signal--Bronson & Garden 20, 000 X
29. Main to Mill Transition 500,000 X
30. Cont. Signal System to conform 30,000 X
31. Resurface N. 6th--Logan to Garden 70 ,000 X
32. Improve Storm Sewer System 50 ,000 X
33. Connection--Sunset to N. 4th 250 ,000 X
947 ,000
1970:
_4. Revise Signal--7th & Rainier 7,000 X
35. Trf. Signal--2nd & Burnett 15,000 X
36. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
_ 37. Widen & Lower Undercrossing--
Shattuck Street 150,000 X
38. Widen Puget Dr. to Pipe Line 200,000 X
39. Widen 116th S.E. to Freeway 300 ,000 X
40. 90th Ave. S.--Renton Ave. to
88th P1. S. 75,000 X
41. 88th Pl. S.--90th to N. City Lim. 60,000 X
857,000
1971:
42. Improve Storm Sewer System 50,000 X
43. Talbot--Grady to Puget Dr. 35,000 X
44. Lake Ave.--Airport to 2nd 50,000 X
45. Langston--Sunset to City Limits 100 ,000 X
46. Interchange--Talbot & Grady 600 ,000 X
47. "M" St.--4th N. to Sunset 150 ,000 X
48. 12th Ave. N.--116th to Sunset 80 ,000 X
49. 132nd S.E.--4th N. to Sunset 200,000 X
50. Wells Ave. Bridge Replacement 200,000 X
1,465,000
•
• • • •
. , • .. .. . ..
. . .. ,
• • „. . , • .
. . ..-1 , -, li // 1 ' '. • • ., •
• / .1 , I
.. ;
•
• ,
- I
. , .
. . i.I I
• I il .
• I „;,LA 1. ..
1'-----\i'c" • . . . ' •
I I
• - • .
•. ..
• 1 ." I. . '
/ ,_i p t -------±- : , -------- ---1 - •
STREETS &
. I ' •
. .
I i
ARTERIALS
: 1
li 1 .
. ,. . . 1.
, 1
i
.,‘ ..-. . .. .
,. ..
_.;.. „
I_ _______y_ \ •
\..1, .....
\. N
. 1 ,
- ....„ o
' • 1 - f,N).*' WASHINGTON \ . Eli ,Ni! :,......•_,,,
, i .s .5...\1• Fardao t i .\N__ .. I: - ,.
"" • 'AT.\• IMP 5 1 ril\' . . - i-i•
ii • •
I A 1 -- re:,• -•-•-•=2--7(... ' PA:144 111-,..:'\ allii
1 1 -. ..-E • • W(4 ittimf \\ - 1 or-ifliol Iki.,\ . •
,,,,, ._ BOEING ar1111101 ME I l 11:::i • • .
Lluilito pi 1
yAtoriii mill
_ . . . •• I
. ,. .
•
r& All= .1MM I ...iamb.V/
.'"6411-'711TallIM II R , . ilinff4 -Er-. • •-7--- , ,
'---- .'\ 1.4 "1111MIftill I Pltt•-VA II .... .,'
:, . . • •E I .. , '.44111111%,fillikip---'w i NC :Mr irk•c.---,* ,,--------.1 — T • . F.-.
• 1
,.. „,....----- --------g-.-r.arb-i-pv-.„,•- . gTAyoF
t--- *- . .
7, m 7 1 . •. : ••• ..
.. .
, , \
,• • ,
, 1 ,
\7;)--)roes -1:,Awed ..,••••-'••' '•i. :•••,. di ' ' ,_ .
1 ...., ,..--
., 1. ..... \• •.',411-...._ AI' 111 ibil-:---- ily,- kt ---(4-\ : ' ..• .• .•adk .N.1,.....„ .. . . .
-40..,?...-_---=_--- ,-- lat. FP •._:._It_____T___. ,•.....,,..,________,_ _ 1 . ...„., . _______:_, . ,
• 1
. waillifirt,7 .,.:„. -......., . . . • , . 1 . . •. ..
,-1 I - . . ......... .........iiii tli i ,. .:.. „
,
/ .
II 4 1 . ,...,..
, i ... . ,.„ ..... , ..
, .,
„... , .i
/,‘ :,..,
-- 4 -____01
-\\-----'-",„.. - . . .
1 ..,. . ibi o • . i .
f ...-
, 1
PI i
•'• .•' ,. . . • • • .
' \.:\\ . '•.,.. , , 'N. [ ',.... ..,.., .
. .
. :. •.., „
r r,
.. ..
,
._-,
_ ..,
LAKE . .
. . 1 g • \ A 4, , ';:.11....., I \ . ,
YOUNGS : •
I •
.,
, .
1 d . I ,. •. I .
Li i
I
- -------_-_______ ,‘,,,,-_L -11 I( . .--1 , . 1 ' : , • ,
, 1
, 1 • .. • ,
r . .
: , ,•
• .
. .. .
1
- %it.i3
WASHINGTON I- I
ti
-�\ , 1 7 :\ \ i
- .'\''\I
!I 10
" n,
If ,
_.
ik is
e
'T
■ , , E--- II I 1
, ,
, , i
NG ._.
""� BOEI
. \;,, 111.114* , ,
I '
p
\ r
1 I I
i 1111k 'AC. CAR
qii, e
,i 1 15j ! i7 L 016 I I ;, A_OF
VIIIhrielwakilPS11"/ \‘‘‘
1, 111111Pr ;:
,�, wAy _ _
AIRPORT WAV 1' , /' I I W
V1
.. Po�Sli o rip
., 1 I Q
9
\\ 1 1 .���, I , �I
\4• I1 i i N
\ • 4 .0
I 1
j .'. I 1
...'I to-.84.114,-1.1 111P111'\,\-\,\\ 031.:-; 1-".i„1,l...1.6..,.,,,,101„„.Ii.4-i'
,‘•s
,,...I
/// ,,, ._ ...
• 1 ,,o i;
, ,,11
,..----_______ ,
111011,,,
411 .-
\ \ V --tI 1. ',. ,_,,,_,
4--,--...„_,!I-..
„.,.
., ,
`\'`'.,,,,, .I.. .. ., (,1„ „‘7\,
7 '
,„,,.,.,_„_
, ri _ t..1',/
F 5eI - .. „
r',
._ _ .___
_.,,i----- ,,,
, , ,
, ,
, „..:::_
„,/ . /r
Y 1_ ! �►.�00 4--
I
rI SS
••ANN ih, ______ __ ..,,_
, .
. /J.__
.,,,
_i
/ 1
I.:7 /. Is ‘. t 1'\.,
y `I 1
.‘
_ \
;,‘
�.1/'-
..1.:11;{;;;;;.,..., 2:,..\\..\..\,
•
T' A ‘ ,..s .„,.......„...
_ _
..
__ ____ _
_ _ _ ,
__
. ss.,
,. ..
,,s
. 1
. . . ‘,
j I
1
. ,, �1 1
11 1\ r•_••
--,___ 4 i 11,...........,
N ‘,.(1-* = i
W` G'iu ll ll �Jl L �l L._.1N i II
�.1 ', .1"
I i
j 1\ \ 1
, 1 , , _
_ 1 il,/ s, i , I - \ ‘i i
01)::) I ,
.....- ., .., ,..., ,ir\16 \ .—.
i
1._._._._.�♦ `t, , 11
1 `I
\\ r\\,\ 1,1
464:
I I
ll G
"i \BOEING � • - I �- -
Irl I i _..
MI I
. \s:n kil ill i 01 1 I
lyy
cntit
Ir�l■ lir
I
PAC. r,np /�� {,1.
Ike
-'1%Iiiii,
27 B, S
I
I ' FOUND•
I 1
0 4 \ \ 1 //'
. 4/4, 1 /,
,\I '4t'' 44 :ill p I f
_ \ ,�,_ _\ \ 1 4, Cpo WAY �' 50 $ / -'-'-' <; ; i
`, , WAV , \ 1, ;; 1 I w
\ \ s‘ e,I''.011D I to. "ff
I` , ,
�0. 35 111116). p)6 • - ‘ ,. . ,
n ' ;
"I VP
_tlIIJ
y AV[ . 6 ` 1
, 25 t
tio4w,` 111 1
1 —. 4';1111111.4/! if
A 0 \Ss I ..' , Is\ /37 KEE 26 :.‘,,, , - , , ,/,, ,(
(I ,/
1 ,, _T,,_
r
_________ 4 ;,;,• 1 0"
i1 to till ______________-[----
t ---- -------,i i\ 4
I' r
i
1 I
;. i
lif .' ' -
1 1. '!. '''. 1 14
1I s..‘: • ,‘ ik A 0.:
_ _i_ ______,_..._ ---- ,„,
, ‘___
. . s,
\„\
. .., .,
L ss .
,_
\s,
, „ s‘
\,,,
____--- _______., ,
, , . .
1 II „..._
,,
; p�'r ,1 ,
—L
40
_ --- --- — - --,
Department: WATER
Year w&S
and Est. Rev.
Project Cost Bonds Budget
1967:
1. 12" & 16" Main in 132nd S.E. from
N. 4th to Heather Downs $ 40,000 X
2. Booster Pump Station, Talbot, 1st Stage 40,000 X
3. Cover two Talbot Hill Reservoirs 50,000 X
4. 16" Main--Talbot to Benson Hill 45,000 X
5. Reserve--Rolling Hills Reservoir 50,000 X
225,000
1968:
�. - 12" Main--Maple Valley Highway 30,000 X
7. Exploratory Drilling--Cedar River
Alluvial Fan 60,000 X
8. Sites for new Wells 10,000 X
9 . Reserve for Rolling Hills Reservoir 70,000 X
170,000
1969 : - -
10. 16" Main, Williams & N. 3rd--Tobin
to Garden Ave. 40,000 X
11. Rolling Hills Reservoir-- (120,000. in
reserve) 80,000 X
12. 16" Main--l2th N. "E" St. to Highlands
Reservoir - 50,000 X
170,000
Department: WATER (continued)
Year W&S
and Est. Rev.
Project Cost Bonds Budget
1970:
- New Wells--Tobin & Burnett $ 60,000 X
14. 24" Main--Talbot Reservoirs to west
side of Valley Freeway 80,000 X
15. 12" Main--Rainier Ave. Tobin St. to
North City Limits 50,000 X
190,000
1971:
I.- 16" Main, S.E. 112th-"E" St. to 112th S.E.
& 16" Main, 112th S.E.-S.E. 112th to
S.E. 100th 72,000 X
17. 10" Main, 13th Ave. S.-Talbot Reservoir
to Shattuck 8,000 X
18. Reserve for Talbot Reservoir 70,000 X
150,000
1972:
19. Reserve for Talbot Reservoir 70,000 X
20. Booster Pump Station-1st stage 4th N.
& "M" St. 30,000 X
21. New Well-7th & Rainier 70,000 X
170,000
. ' .
I I
I I j
I •.
. . •.
, , -- . • .
. •
. .
,....._ . . •
.,.
-I! ••-„
, • .
. ,.. ,.,
: • .
, , 1 ,..,
, .
.. ..
., .
I
WATER „..:., 1
: •; '.. r . .
•
(...7. , L, 1
_! __-1, . . ,
•• :, 1.4 . , : • •• . . .
. . ., .
•••
.i ... . ..., . 1 •
•; .
. .. r • •
/am i •,•, .,....., ,
. .
,ill
, . •.
•
, ----a-- -- \
., . . '.' • '
• .
\ 1 ... . . \ ' , . , •,
'__ 1 ''•-., . : I • .
--• I'•;• ',., LAKE ......, „
WASHINGTON '' m 111 . Noillkil`•-•'' L•1 • -I r ,,,,
kil.11111 :4 1 „,1•' ,,,..
• - . ..___ ,, -Q' I----' ' •,. .. . •
1 ar=4162Wffi. tr. .
. . tim r1211 .F7APL: 11
m—L.W. ii.
EMSEF . ' '••
. m
ml am. 4 mr. 11'
gni rill.I .M 11 ----,
,\•. k_,...... ips , =I BOEING , 1741111110110 .-.......j
11‘ lik lila a NI 10100i 11111M Am , • :II .1 I: . .
, . . • 1
t INNI tell I II I I PlIfY,I el II .
, I : ha 4 . • •i • i •
, ' 4114114 ..._ .11 POC CAR /I.
I L. . _.'.12 . . . • .
,. ' . ialretlibl4 • :ii A ,nim..../44011b
...•. _.,_ , - • -1----! -- • -7.1--!--7''
1 .....- ll I 41111111.116•11131/4
-- / \._, ..;::• i me P ..'" 7:' O
•
. . :
. !:.;": •
' . .
! nil 1 i W44 I I • ' . ...: .
jai
— '' . 1. !- I :• • ' •
=F .. .._ igai, . Imo,
.:. - r Namitiviair Et. / . ,Niiih.. .., , • 00
, ... ,....--_. will11 • r----- . ' '
___TiZIE
• .
i joy . int . , I.: . --- - .-... . • .
. .
. -...:-'. , ':::. .-. 00.• "..... ..,.-_-,:.-:.:- --------,---., •
___.- -WO. .. - •‘:.- - '.• 1 . ' /'•1 . ' • • .'
--- --'''' • 1.1.1 Ael:. ---- . - • ''' • I • ..
.• -•.'' °I.11.111.11111h.' 14.11-1P-Ilk:''''
J - - P-4'1\.‘ 5 • ' t
\. 1 • ro':=4\`.'... f • A .,!, ' •
1 l'IA'AN ' .- A \*ZdoilAINI . : '''--:-...'-• - ' • : ,
ii .
1 ' 1 • S'1:1.1110&illibmilaillilLAI! Villik0... . .
•
....-
- • (TL? -------• --. '- ';'' 1101.11111 "TTVC.-- '7., -----''77.,...,
I
. . . .
18 .-- . . .
,.. -•_,„ . .
--, , • , ,.. .. . •
' ., , . rt.- : • . . i . .
.
.1.7 1.9..i , - .. .
,
(...... 1 I ;
. . . ..
,..
- :
,••
. . . . • .
I.
. .
.. .
. .
...if \\'',•:.
_
__ _ __... ...._ .. .
.. . . .
lii lik ..
,.: ,.
• I r-
. :
.. .
...:.
.....
. s
. .
-----N
211 _ I
rc......_., .
d I'- , \\.\\, . L•::...,
.•
% . ..
. ..
.. .
\ .
, . A fl • I ! .,
.. yLoAuKNEGs. .
L. ..
, , .1 . .•
.. ••
•,
.,
.• .
. '
_ ri, •
-11 1 j_ I ,•
•.:
..
., •
..,
. --------- -----
I
Department: PARK
Year State-Fed.
and Est. Matching
Project Cost Funds GOB Budget
1967:
1. Lake Washington Beach, Development $450,000 X
2. Cedar River Park, Development*
3. Liberty Park Grandstand 148,161 X
598,161
1968:
4. Highlands Playfield & Pool, Dev. 88 ,000** X
5. Cascade Park, Acquisition 40,000 X
6. Sierra Heights Park, Acquisition 50,000 X
7. Talbot Hill Park, Development 99 ,352 X
277,352
1969:
- Kiwanis Park, Development 67,754 X
9. Earlington Playground, Acquisition 40, 000 X
10. Lake Washington Beach Addn, Acquisition 150,000 X
11. Kennydale Park Addition, Acquisition 40,000 X
12. Tiffany Park, Acquisition 4,000 X
301,754
1970: •
13. Philip Arnold Park, Development 79, 379 X
14. Heather Downs Park, Acquisition 90,000 X
15. Maplewood Playground, Development 30,000 X
199,379
•
Department: PARK (continued)
Year State-Fed.
and Est. Matching
Project Cost Funds GOB Budget
1971:
16. Hazelwood Park, Acquisition $ 40,000 X
17. Windsor Hills, Development 32 , 000 X
72,000
1972:,
18. Honeydew Park, Acquisition 40,000 X
19. Nelsen Playfield, Acquisition 40 ,000 X
80, 000
* Est. Cost and Funding information not available
** Not including swimming pool
I •
1 1
, 17
i i• ....„L , ••• '
1 1
I I.
, ' •.,A
PAR KS , Ad,....
, , 1
•.: .• 1 1
. i fr =
, . .
0/11 ismor i t..1 .
•11111 ;
I, •„
• 1
-- ------ ----• \--
, ! •.
! . •, , •\,•
. . i
L r .
. . ...,
--,
LT__asI, '.b.iir%1•tIp.-4fa;...4..0,/,11y1;)u P of1,111._r,.1.4;A,l,„b,„qS-,...1z.TbE/qA3‘Nt‘4a—••,
f i,•re•'"t.i-,-p'r".,:,.,==.=.
N.W.....,E gI'AL\S.'H'L I,A'-1lippN.,',-1.1\.K.-G-,\E\--A-\•. .I!,144
wn n^1m1',-7'\,„ •,\Asv)...bMmm1.11..,.i 4,i4_tlI
\
\ 4nnI I0 et..,iIc.1is.AA1.HaEA...l1.'1_l1.11.kN.1l4al.„ii i,b)l.ill0..,-krar,..m.„i410fi.i,liPii5ftirltil/n...kf.3.`n.a;„r tA i.,,l.,ji4i.l,.i.l..i,l r,Ii.Iar
.1i.1 y4n8
.•f.„I1,'
. •
A
Itsi 7 Li :Ii
.1_,•
-----
r1I--- \ 4.411FAINROA111111',itkv x\ II i A.
I 3 :
-,... -,.., :-, titik.„.4 sr • -.417 ka........, , .................. - .T-, - 2.) • — i__. •
/... *----- --7'''.- --- 1
-77--- ,. ,
! \ ii; , ... •i -) -- .•. f----,,,,,, ,__,_ .1,...: r(04..,.. „ „...,.....„.. - -.....1 i ___:.- ..,1, .
1 I ,, \\ , 11
,,,..... -......- ___... .li _,..1 1 ,1
....ialle....1.111111110VV:011111111 . \
,..... 1 ,., .
ill AP'-•..........„... -ill liffi.11.'.
A I= I•ti lar,A . • i .•,r\,
1 -nt.., --------• \ ist 0'
,,cairt 1.4.11.L. IPIAZ.4, • •
wr. ,_... ., i
i •
! . I i • i
_.
.. I
1 i I IT
1 1 i.
I '-'44 iir 1 . ........,..._....... .. ... ,
Ag.,. II kis ..
.,...
-.1
, • ,
A c• , .
...
! 2 ll am ••
. I a
• I : 1 ; ii —LI__ . ..__. __.....
. I f
i - 11 1 '...•..,T-k . ..... ....._...___
T\ a !i 7
;I ,,. .
-\
-
..
. ,
1 1 P., . • .
r I, ,...,...•• . .
•
. 11. I •
1 ,
.' .
:
I
• :
•
. ,.‘ t. .....,... ; .?....1
. ,
LAKE
1 1 A ' I I 111
L-- ! ,7 I I I • i • ••:. YOUNGS
;:: i F: . ; .•
1 11 .. ..
..., ........ ..... _ ., . ......... ._......._. _ . .. , ..
,__
Department: MISCELLANEOUS
Year -
and Est. Limited
Project Cost GOB GOB Budget
1967:
1. City Hall & furnishings (includes
Data Processing equipment) $1,415,000 X
2. Underground wiring--Civic Center 50,000 X
3. Landscaping--Civic Center site 35,000 X
4. Fire Site #3--Development 35,000 X
5. Training Site Facilities &
Development 75,000 X
$1,625,000
1968:
6. City Garage & Shops 100,000 X
7. Fire Station #3 125,000 X
8. Highlands Branch Library 100,000 X
9. Relocation Burnett Ave. RR Tracks 1,600,000 X
10. Downtown Parking Facilities 500,000 X
11. P.S. Regional Transportation Study
& P.S. Governmental Conference 50,000 X
$2,475,000
1970:
12. Airport Storm Sewer Project 200,000 X
Ia " �i.' {-•
_-_ -- = -
i li Li •
i i •H
[MISCELLANEOUS i .
1-1 PROJECTS '
5
I
1 \.
,� �� i
a. LAKE
•
1 �' a
, , ..:\ WASHINGTON 1 g. .� ._.+, 1 \
Allah .
��, ..== , r . ,�t .ft
•
BOEING
i- lith ) I I ILI'
�,4 11 r , 9 111111 �R C`j ;
♦..r `-� ` 1, i •//11,SOI NDRY �� `� - i
I 111111111111"1111111WMilai VIIIIIIIIngell ,-, - 44911PIVA ii
6.,...4_,„,
- 1 e
-
• 1 L'il 4- c-k6.
• �
ll ipr) ,--..::• - ,-, , /- :
.*T- '''' '''
•i ,
..,.... . Er„. _ , .
. : .4/ •. . ,7 1
1
\4,--- 4,..: .------i-c- 4,...-0.1-1 • ' , . .. , . 1 ,
,.. i
-4\*"...... Al, ( I • •,, •
w ' WIlikti ,fli
i 'IL �.
I ,r__„,. .
J ...._.... ..........,
, .
, ...).., 0
i
a
. „v. .
__ _ __ ________
// 7� r I ,'i is/ ------\
., _ }- - -- .—
lr \_ r�AKE
t
1� t I I - •
•
YOUNOS
I
d
'\,)
- -- - -- :rae•ec� I I '-1 , I --
J
1,
MALL .
The- Renton Plaza Mall is the unifying eleent of the CBD. The Mall :
serves to 'group and strengthen an otherwise, haphazard development
By ,separation of the pedestrian and vehicular traffic, - the -person
on foot has unlimited freedom of movement between -business estab-
lishments. Prior to mall development, however, _it is necessary -to
solve existing .vehicular traffic circulation and parking problems -
in, the CBD. The initial phase ‘ of mall development is , therefore,
planned for 'Phase' III of the overall CBD Improvement _Program. -
Three phases of mall development _are' proposed by the CBD Phasing
Plan and would be,-undertaken simultaneously:with other CBD improve=
ments. The first phase. of _the mall ,would include Third Street =from
Burnett -to Main Avenues . , Wells Avenue would be -converted to a mall
in the:second phase and Williams Avenue in the third phase
Cost' estimates for malLdevelopment are based on preliminary design .
plans 1±iiciuding basic features described further in this report.
The- actual coetof building-the mall will vary according to" the ,=
tlq)e- of .features incorporated into the final design and any special
development -problems -encountered. - Detailed architectural and ex - ,
gineering studies should be undertake _before final-designs and
costestimates are made.
The--methods ' for financing-mall' development are well defined by -
,
State-Law. . The -creation -of a Local ' Improvement District is recom-,
mendedbut -presents a difficult assessment problem and has yet to
be- tried. Formation of a non-profit-mall‘ development -organization .
is recommended for the operation and maintenance -of the mall area
,and should include participation of the City. -
-46- .
RENTON MALL DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF TOTAL COSTS
A. Landscaping 105 ,100
B. Sidewalk Improvement 16,000
C. Street Improvements 96 ,200
D. Utilities 23 , 760
E. Pedestrian Overcrossing 15, 000
F. Street Furniture 53 , 550
G. Arcades 231, 000
H. Underground Wiring 54 ,750
Sub-Total 595, 360
10% Contingencies 59 , 536
TOTAL 654 , 896
Call 654 , 900
Alternative 1 - Sky Shield with Arcades
a) Sky Shield 518 , 000
b) Mall Development Cost 654 , 900
c) Total for Alternative l 1,172 , 900
Alternative • 2 - Sky Shield without Arcades
a) Sky Shield 782, 000
b) Mall Development (less
arcade cost) 423 ,900
c) Total for Alternative 2 1,205, 900
-47-
RENTON MALL DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF PHASES
Item Phase III Phase IV Phase V Total
A. Landscaping 44 , 500 42 , 200 18 ,400 105, 100
B. Sidewalk 7 ,000 6 , 500 2 ,500 16 , 000
Improvements
C. Street 36 ,400 40 ,300 19 , 500 96, 200
Improvements
D. Utilities 1(4760 8, 760 4 ,240 23, 760
E. Pedestrian -- -- 15, 000 15, 000
Overcrossing
F. Street Furniture 20 ,450 23 , 200 9 ,900 53, 550
Ge Arcades 94 ,.500 - 105 , 000 31 ,500 231, 000
H. Underground 24 ,000 23 ,250 7 , 500 54 , 750
Wiring
Sub-Total 237 ;.610 - 249 ,210 108 ,540 595, 360
10% Contingencies. 23, 761 24 , 921 10 , 854 59 ,536
TOTAL 261, 371 274 ,131 119 , 394 654 , 896
Call 261,400 274 ,100 119 ,400 654 , 900
Alternative.. l:
a) Sky shield 196, 000 217 , 000 105 ,000 518 , 000
w/arcade
b) Mall cost 261,400 274 ,100 119 ,400 654 , 900
c) Total 457, 400 491 ,100 224,400 - 1,172, 900
Alternative -2: -
a) Sky shield 290; 0_00 352, 000 - 140 , 000 782, 000
without arcade
b) Mall cost 166 ;900 - 169 ,100 87 , 900 423,900
c) Total 456; 900 521,100 227 ,900 1,205, 900
-48-
MALL DEVELOPMENT
Phase . Area Description Estimated Cost
III .
(1st Phase Third St. - from Close Third St. to Landscaping 44, 500
Mall Dev. ) Burnett to Main vehicular traffic & con- Sidewalk Improv. 7,000
Ayes. vert to ped. mall by im- Street Improv. 36,400
provement of street & Utilities 10,760
sidewalks, provision of Street Furniture 20,450
lndscp & street furniture Arcades 94 ,500
& construction of arcades Undergrnd wiring 24, 000
Contingencies - 23,790
(A) Total 261,400
Skyshield 196,000
(B) Total 457,400
IV
(2nd Phase Wells Ave. - Close Wells Ave. & convert Landscaping 42,200
Mall Dev. ) from Second St. to ped. mall by improve- Sidewalk Improv. 6,500
to 1/2 block S ment of street & sidewalks, Street Improv. 40, 300
of Third St. provision of landscp & st. Utilities 8, 760
furniture and construction Street Furniture 23,200
of arcades Arcades 105,000
Undrgrnd wiring 23,250
Contingencies 24 ,890
(A) Total 274 ,100
Skyshield 217,000
_ (B) Total 491,100
V
(3rd Phase Williams Ave. - Close Williams Ave. & con- Landscaping 18,400
Mall Dev. ) approx. 1/2 blk vert to a ped. mall by Sidewalk Improv. 2,500
N & S of Third St. improvement of street & Street Improv. . 19,500
sidewalks, provision of Utilities 4,240
lndscp. & street furniture Ped. Overcrossing 15,000
& construction of arcades Street Furniture 9,900
Arcades 31,500
Undergrnd wiring 7,500
Contingencies 10,860
(A) Total 119,400
Skyshield 105,000
(B) Total 224,400
•
Total - (A) with arcades 654, 900
Total - (B) with arcades & skyshield 1,172 , 900
•
1). • •
• feel:
• FINANCIAL
•110
: • : STATEMENT of
ISO • 2 11.11
I owl/10mo °
010 Oww OO
n =
FINANCIAL STATEMENT BY FUNDS
•
j i 'Current Expense Fund
j •
The Current Expense Fund is. .established by authority of State Law
toyfinance the general corporate functions of the City. The eight-
een City departments that function within the Current Fund arei
Legislative Civil Service Commission
l Executive Non-Departmental
Police Court Police
City .Clerk Fire
City Treasurer Civil Defense
Purchasing Engineering
Legal 'Traffic Engineering
Planning. Parking Control
Building Maintenance Health •
Li
ReVenues are derived .from the following principal, sources :
1_, i Property and Utility Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Receipts from the Use of Money and Property_ . , .
Monies received from Other Government Agencies
Reimbursements from Other Funds of the City for
Pro-rating .the Cost of General Municipal Operations
•
This fund shared in State collected revenues on a per capita basis
receiving approximately $2. 04 per. capita from the Liquor Tax, $5. 56
•per ca ita from Liquor Profits and $3. 19 per capita from the Motor
Vehicl',e Excise Tax.
Transfers from property tax revenue are made to the following funds
according to budgetary allocations :
Street
1 I i Park
•
Library •
I Cumulative Reserve Funds
•
Property taxes in the sum of $165, 643. 91 due from the' county. in
December 1966 were received in January 1967 , which ' is why the 1966
property tax receipts shown are less than anticipated.
•
•
-51-
i
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT EXPENSE FUND
BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31 , 1966
ASSETS
Cash - 27 ,679 . 14
27 ,679 . 14
City Clerk' s Petty Cash 75. 00
City Engineer' s Petty Cash 50 . 00
Building Director' s Petty Cash 75. 00
City Treasurer' s Petty Cash 475. 00
• Accounts Receivable:
Taxes - General Property 165 , 643. 91
Delinquent Taxes 24 , 370. 10
Total Assets . 218 , 368. 15
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
Appropriated for 1967 Budget 62 ,975. 00
Reserve for Petty Cash - 675. 00
Accounts Payable:
Taxes due 1965 G.O. Bond Fund 15 , 650: 00
Allowance for Delinquent Taxes 174, 364 ; 01
Unappropriated Surplus (35 ,295. 86)
Total Liabilities and Surplus 218 , 368. 15
-52-
CITY OF RENTON
10 YEAR COMPARATIVE STATEMENT
POPULATION, ASSESSED VALUATIONS & TAX LEVIES
Assessed Millage Dollar
Year Population Valuations Levy Levy
1958 15, 680 24 ,886 ,643 18 .24 453,910
1959 17 , 223 34 , 386 ,108 16 . 40 599 , 027
1960 18 ,453 46 ,766 ,135 15. 806 734 ,131
1961 18 , 800 53 , 686 ,022 18 . 750 992 ,499
1962 19 , 590 53,710 , 873 13.913 725, 952
1963 20 ,175 ' 57 ,689 , 798 17. 31 971, 070
1964 20 , 600 71,141, 084 17. 0888 1,195 , 483
1965 21,600 76 ,024 ,233 16. 3021 1,233, 644
1966 21, 701 , 82 ,865 , 888 17 . 32908 1,429 , 806
1967 23, 700 116 ,000 , 037 16. 81827 1,944 , 374
STATEMENT OF OVERLAPPING DEBT
FOR THE YEAR 1966
Outstanding Bonded Debt
City of Renton - 12-31-1966 600 ,000
Proposed 1967 Limited General Obligation Bonds 1, 500 , 000
Less Bond Fund Cash (50 ,137)
Estimated General Obligation Bond Debt 2 ,049 , 863
Overlapping Debt: *
Port. of Seattle 1,186, 000
King County 1,527, 000
Renton School District #403 12 , 508 , 000
King County Hospital District No. 1 1,124 ,000 16 , 345, 000
Total Direct and Overlapping Debt 18 , 394 , 863
*Portion applicable to City of Renton
Ratio of Direct ..Debt to Assessed Valuation 1. 77%
Ratio of Direct and Overlapping Debt to Assessed Valuation 15. 86%
Per Capita Assessed Valuation 4 ,461. 00
Per Capita Direct Debt 79 . 00
Per Capita Direct and Overlapping Debt . 707. 00
-53-
CITY OF RENTON
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1966
General Fixed Assets:
Land $20 ,290 ,908
Buildings 1,299 , 656
Improvements other than buildings 201 , 336
Machinery & Equipment 862,408
Total General Fixed Assets $22 , 654 , 308
Investments in Fixed Assets :
Investments in property acquired prior to 1-1-65* $21,488, 977
Investments in property acquired after 1-1-65:
From Current Fund , 50 , 000
From Arterial Street Fund 323 , 500
From Cumulative Reserve Funds 252, 850
From Library.. Funds 450 ,000
From Park Funds 88 , 981
Tot.a _Investments__in_...E.ix.Pd ,.A.ssPts.. $22, 654 , 308
*Inasmuch as Fixed Asset Ledgers were not maintained prior to
January 1, 1965, the figures shown are based on our best estimates.
STATEMENT OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
BY FUNCTION & ACTIVITIES
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1966
Function & Other Machinery
Activity. Total Land Bldgs. Improv, & Equip.
General Govt. 2 ,026 , 504 1, 295 ,144 371,360 -- 360 ,000
Fire Dept. 348 ,708 64 , 621 137 ,000 -- 147 ,087
Street Dept. 16, 527 , 665 16 , 524 , 827 -- -- 2 , 838
Library 713 ,068 13,068 450 ,000 -- 250 ,000
1
Park Dept. 3 ,038,363 2 , 393 ,248 341,296 201, 336 102 ,483
TOTAL 22 ,654 , 308 20 , 290 ,908 1,299 , 656 201, 336 862, 408
-54-
CITY OF RENTON
OPERATION -
OF FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR 1 9 6 6
Balance Cash Transfers Cash Balance Investments Balance
Fund 1-1-66 Receipts Receipts Disbursements Disbursements 12-31-1966 12-31-1966 12-31-1966
Current Expense 75,647.39 2,008,256.99. 18,685.98 2,060,025,28 14,885.94 27,679.14 27,679.14
Waterworks Utility 54,024.57 1,142,062.23 -- 927,242.48 147,440.53 121,403.79 98,558.00 219,961.79
City Street 52,733.74 138,006.42 342,709.40 469,354.06 -- 64,095.50 13,102.87 77,198.37
Library 967.02 5,530.24 146,968.70 146,281.20 7,184.76 7,184.76
Park 18,997.63 15,321.90 276,488.00 259,556.64 51,250.89 30,475.00 81,725.89
Airport 13,652.55 63,262.66 -- 42,665.33 20,000.00 14,249.88 30,000.00 44,249.88
Off-Street Parking 6,967.69 6,848.25 1,496.53 9,000.00 3,319.41 11,034.00 14,353.41
Firemen's Pension 51,094.05 237,792.45 .11 27,214.57 239,111.90 22,560.14 858,006.08 880,566:22
Cedar River Park Acq. 110,783.89 4,792.00 35,300.00 58,000.00 -- 92,875.89 70,000.00 162,875.89
Cedar River M&I 5,561.26 29,088.13 -- 32,371.89 2,277.50 5,000.00 7,277.50
L.I. Guaranty - 1,853.26 1,055.71 -- -- 2,500.00 408.97 26,130.00 26,538.97
Payroll 112,116.37 -- 1,630,340.00 -- 1,644,252.77 98,203.60 98,203.60
Claims 260,588.52 -- 2,576,156.46 .11 2,623,683.82 213,061.05 213,061.05
Arterial Street 854.31 88,822.91 21,708.00 83,464.10 -- 27,921.12 30,000.00 57,921.12
Cum. Reserve #1182 356.70 -- -- 353.22 -- 3.48 3.48
Cum. Reserve #1184 1,369.62 -- -- 1,167.04 202.58 202.58
Cum. Reserve #1689 6,464.17 1,707.11 3,250.00 365.00 18.00 11,038.28 6,479.15 17,517.43
Cum. Reserve #1698 17,666.36 4,614.37 5,583.00 24,520.24 -- 3,343.49 16,200.00 19,543.49
Cum. Reserve #1894 72,869.97 98,275.14 27,230.00 198,305.22 -- 69.89 69.89
Cum. Reserve #1975 13,396.12 172,715.75 -- 185,594.95 -- 516.92 10,000.00 10,516.92
Cum. Reserve #1990 1,213.03 331.00 1,312.00 516.05 -- 2,339.98 2,339.98
Cum. Reserve #2104 5,860.00 91.25 5,224.00 -- 3,000.00 8,175.25 5,000.00- 13,175.25
1960 G.O. Bond Redemp. 10,082.03 14,685.05 17,829.36 6,937.72 6,937.72
Equipment Rental 49,681.83 155,528.85 428.63 146,252.62 59,386.69 15,000.00 74,386.69
Special Deposit 4,641.50 31,135.63 -- 30,648.18 5,128.95 5,128.95
1953 W&S Bond Redemp. 14,775.85 -- 20,794.17 -- 20,107.50 15,462.52 15,462.52
1954 W&S Bond Redemp. 3,245.00 -- 8,919.00 -- 8,998.75 3,165.25 3,165.25
1959 W&S Bond Redemp. 23,083.91 -- 45,568.75 -- 45,943.75 22,708.91 22,708.91
1965 W&S Bond Redemp. 13,359.16 -- 33,515.00 -- 33,550.00 13,324.16 13,324.16
1953 W&S Bond Reserve 13.00 -- -- -- 13.00 20,895.00 20,908.00
1954 W&S Bond Reserve 125.00 -- -- • -- -- 125.00 31,875.00 32,000.00
1959 W&S Bond Reserve 1.13 -- -- -- 1.13 48,159.48 48,160.61
L.I.D. Control 32,294.35 68,936.61 -- -- 83,706.78 17,524.18 17,524.18
1965 G.O. Bond" Redemp. 3,649.48 62,243.57 5,744.17 16,950.00 43,198.88 43,198.88
1965 W&S Bond Reserve 1,000.00 482.30 12,000.00 12,482.00 1,000.30 19,482.00 20,482.30
N. Renton Interchange 49,127.55 296,931.00 4,178.50 350,237.05 -- __
Library Construction -- 1,565.67 1,565.67 -- __ --
1965-W&S Construction 107,066.33 730,000.00 -- 195,631.95 474,171.18 167,263.20 167,263.20
1965 W&S Refunding Bond 1,719.15 22,010.00 -- -- 22,790.41 938.74 529,387.19 530,325.93
1,198,903.49 5,400,527.52 5,217,925.37 5,217,925.37 5,471,070.87 1,128,360.14 1,874,783.77 3,003,143.91
•
Investment Control- 2,522,974.28 . 909,351.81 -- -- 1,557,542.32 1,874,783.77
TOTALS 3,721,877.77 6,309,879.33 5,217,925.37 5,217,925.37 7,028,613.19 3,003,143.91 1,874,783.77 3,003,143.91
CITY OF RENTON
INVESTMENT OPERATION
FOR THE YEAR 1966
Investments Investments
Fund 1-1-1966 Purchased Sold 12-31-1966
Firemen' s Pension 728,097.72 238,085.44 108,177.08 858,006.08
Cedar River Park Acq. 70,000.00 -- -- 70,000.00
Cedar River M&I 25,000.00 -- 20,000.00 5,000.00
L.I. Guaranty 23,630.00 2,500.00 -- 26,130. 00
Cum. Reserve #1894 90,000.00 -- 90,000.00 --
1953 W&S Bond Reserve 20,895.00 -- -- 20,895. 00
1954 W&S Bond Reserve 31,875.00 -- -- 31,875.00
1959 W&'S Bond Reserve 48,159.48 -- -- 48,159.48
Cum. Reserve #1698 20,000.00 -- 3,800.00 16,200.00
Arterial Street 30,000.00 -- -- 30,000.00
Airport 10,000.00 20,000.00 -- 30,000.00
Off-Street Parking 2,034.00 9,000.00 -- 11,034. 00
• Street 13,102.87 -- -- 13,102.87
Cum. Reserve #2104 2,000.00 3,000.00 -- 5,000. 00
Cum. Reserve #1975 179,575.00 -- 169,575.00 10,000.00
1965 W&S Construction 247,190.00 474,171.18 721,361.18 --
1965 W&S. Reserve 7,000.00 12,482.00 -- 19,482.00
Cum. Reserve#1689 6,479.15 -- -- 6,479.15
Park 30,475.00 -- -- 30,475.00
No. Renton Interchange 296,931.00 -- 296,931.00 --
Equipment Rental 15,000.00 -- • -- 15,000.00
Waterworks Utility 99,515.06 146,741.00 147,698.06 98,558.00
1965 W&S Refunding 526,015.00 3,372.19 -- 529,387.19
Library Construction -- • -- -- --.
.
TOTALS 2,522,974.28 909,351.81 ( 1,557,542.32 1,874,783.77
i
CITY OF R ENT O N -
-
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER-
3 1 , 1 9 6 6
Current Tax • Special Clearing G.O. Bond L.I.D. Trust Utility & General Fixed
Assets Total Fund Funds Revenue Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Enterprise Funds Assets
Cash & Investments 4,877,927.68 27,679.14 398,656.18 359,927.49 311,264.65 50,136.60 70,193.15 1,743,701.25 1,916,369.22 --
Accts. Receivable 455,906.53 190,689.01 -- 79,267.42 - -- -- 116,076.86 -- 69,873.24 --
Inventories 175,219.20 -- -- 8,863.64 -- -- -- -- 166,355.56 --
Fixed Assets 31,452,738.71 -- -- 136,903.35 -- -- -- -- 10,661,527.36 22,654,308.00
Deferred Assets 1,980.20 -- -- 1,980.20 -- -- -- -- -- --
Less Reserve-Deprec. 1,920,461.64 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,920,461.64 --
TOTAL ASSETS 38,884,233.96 218,368.15 398,656.18 586,942.10 311,264.65 50,136.20 186.270.01 1,743,701.25 12,778,836.90 22,654,308.00
Liabilities
Warrants Outstanding 311,264.65 -- -- -- 311,264.65 -- -- -- -- --
•
Bonds & Notes O/S 3,499,601.04 -- -- -- -- 1,200,000.00 133,601.04 -- 2,166,000.00 --
Interest Payments 41,594.86 . -- -- -- . -- - 17,430.00 -- -- 24,164.86 --
' Other Liabilities 5,522,731.32 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,522,731.32
TOTAL LIABILITIES 9,375,191.87 -- -- -- 311,264.65 1,217,430.00 133,601.04 -- 7,712,896.18 --
Surplus
Fixed Assets Invest. 22,654,308.00 -- ' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,654,308.00
Earned Surplus 54,511.61 -- -- (392.64). -- "-- -- -- 54,904.25 --
Donated Surplus 406,031.44 -- -- 222,731.44 -- -- -- -- 183,300.00 --
•
Approp. Surplus 248,449.00 62,975.00 179,324.00 6,150.00- -- -- -- -- -- --
Unapprop. Surplus 6,145,742.04 (35,295.86) 66,669.17 169,356.80 -- -- -- 885,695.17 5,059,316.76 --
TOTAL SURPLUS 29,509,042.09 27,679.14 245,993.17 397,845.60 -- -- -- 885,695.17 5,297,521.01 22,654,308.00
TOTAL-LIABILITIES' 1,217,430.00 133,601.04 885,695.17 13,010,417.19 22,654,308.00
AND SURPLUS 38,884,233.26 27,679.14 245,993.17- 397,845.60 311,264.65 .
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC INDICES
DECEMBER 31, 1966
Total Bank Building Postal
Year Deposits Permits Receipts
1958 33, 000 . 00 6 , 066 . 137 340 ,421
1960 38 , 390, 227 1, 959 ,428 479 ,591
1962 50 , 397, 831 10 , 493 ,375 578 ,225
1963 54, 721, 408 9 ,922 , 782 613 ,270
1964 58,129 ,238 4 ,232 , 689 640 , 716
1965 64, 638, 952 15 , 795,936 772 ,577
1966 75,509 , 000 35 ,142 ,193 983 ,460
OTHER GROWTH INDICES
: Assessed .Valua.tion City Total School
Year City School Dist. Population Enrollment
1961 53,589 ,252 72 ,036 ,853 18 , 880 10 , 375
1962 53, 317, 986 73 ,185 , 064 19 ,590 11, 027
1963 57, 690 ,582 79 ,018 , 882 . 20 ,175 11 ,746
1964 71 ,141,084 94 , 422 ,351 20 ,600 12 ,142
1965 76 , 024 , 233 101 , 685, 362 21 ,600 12 , 913
1966 82 , 865, 888 112 ,154 ,288 23,700 13 ,570
ACTUAL AND PROJECTED INCREASE IN POPULATION,
LAND AREA, AND NUMBER OF MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
1953--1970 i
Population Land Area Municipal Employees
Percent Square Percent Percent
Year Number Increase Miles Increase Number Increase
1953 16 , 500 --- 4 . 9 --- 148 ---
1954 16, 800 2. 1 5. 4 10 .2 148 ---
1955 16 , 300 3. 4* 5. 4 ---• 157 6. 1
1956 16 ,056 1. 5* 6. 3 16. 7 167 6. 4
1957 16 ,900 5. 3 6. 3 --- 162 3. 1*
1958 15, 680 7 . 8* 6. 4 . 1. 6 . 176 8. 6
1959 17 , 233 9. 8 10 . 7 . 67 . 2 , 181 2 . 8
1960 18 ,453 7. 1 11.2 4 . 7. 193 6. 6
1961 18 , 880 2. 3 12 .1 8. 0 198 2 . 6
1962 19 ,500 3. 3 13. 1 8. 3 206 4. 0
1963 20 ,175 3. 5 13. 5 3a0 207 . 5
1964 20 , 600 2. 1 13. 5 --- 218 5. 3
1965 21, 600 4. 9 13. 5 --- 224 2 , 7
1966 23,700 9 . 7 13. 8 2. 3 234 6. 4
1967 26,000 9 . 7 15. 6 --- 258 10 . 2
1968 26, 800 --- 16. 1 --- 270 ---
1969 28, 140 --- 16. 6 --- 280 ---
1970 29 ,550 --- 17. 1 --- 291 ---
*Decrease
-58-
The Planning Department gratefully acknowledges the following
sources of information used in the compilation of the Capital
Improvement Program Report:
City of Renton Financial Report, 1966
City of Renton 1967 Annual Budget
John Graham and Company Technical Supplement .
Capital Improvement Programming and a Review of
Present and Potential Revenues of the Munici-
pal Government of the City of Renton, Washington
- A Survey Report 1963. Published by Public
Administration Service
-59-