Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout427 Windsor Street Modification Clarification January 14, 2021 City of Renton To: Nathan Janders, Civil Engineer II City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 From: Signature GCI, General Contractor Kinderveer Singh & Ikman Kaur 427 Windsor Way NE Renton, WA 98056 RE: - Singh & Kaur Residence - B20003694 Street Modification Clarification Permit #: B20003694 Site Address: 427 Windsor Way NE Renton WA 98056 Dear Mr. Nathan Janders, This letter is in regards to the Building Permit Application B20003694 at 427 Windsor Way NE Renton WA 98056, Parcel Number 9476200370, specifically a request to the street standards requirements required per RMC 4-6-060. Project Narrative: This project involves the construction of a new single family residence home on a 6,500 sq. ft. parcel at the address listed above. The property is currently zoned R-8. The property currently has an existing home that was built in 1943. This home is currently permitted to be demolished under Permit Number B20005332. Modification: The proposed code section being modified is RMC 4-6-060. This project site fronts Windsor Way NE along the East side of the Property line. Per City code 4-6-060, half street improvements shall be required and must include a pavement width of 20 feet (13 feet from centerline), a 0.5- foot curb, an 8 foot planting strip, an 5 - foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. However, the city will support efforts to retain existing frontage along Lynnwood Ave NE under the following condition: The curb, sidewalk, and driveway must meet current ADA and City Standards. A modification request will be required to be submitted to the City. Justification: A)The modification substantially meets the policy directives and objectives of the current City’s Comprehensive Plan. It is the minimum adjustment necessary to meet projected future use requirements such as replacing the driveway. B)Sidewalks and frontage requirements will meet safety, function, appearance and maintainability. Sidewalks meet criteria as proposed in RMC 4-6-060. No change necessary. C)Not replacing the sidewalk will not be injurious to the adjacent properties as it matches all the surrounding sidewalks of the neighborhood. D)The sidewalk does not conform to the intent and purpose of the code. 5’ sidewalk on both sides. ANd to match surrounding sidewalks. E)The sidewalk meeting the code and to match the surrounding sidewalks is a good reason to keep it existing and not have to replace. The city supports efforts to retain frontage with conditions. F)The modification will not harm or impact the surrounding properties in the vicinity as it matches all other sidewalks and is in good condition. Kevin Singh Signature GCI General Manager (206)751-3200 ksingh@signaturegci.com