Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Shoreline Master Program Update (1973-1980)
t IM-ORTANT DATES ESTABLISHED BY THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 Dates Action June 1 , 1971 The Shoreline Management Act of 1971 became effective . City of Renton is required to enforce the Act and issue exemptions and substantial development permits . Sep ember 8, 1971 Within 60 days from the receipt of proposed thr.ugh guidelines , Renton is required to submit Nov-mber 27 , 1971 written comments on these guidelines to the Department of Ecology . Jun- 1 , 1971 to The City of Renton is required to write a Nov-mber 30 , 1971 letter to the Department of Ecology stating that the City would complete an inventory and develop a master program for the shorelines of the city. . January 26 , 1972 The final guidelines are to be reviewed by to arch 26 , 1972 the City of Renton and comments made to the Department of Ecology. Jun 1 , 1971 The City of Renton is required to complete thr ugh a comprehensive inventory of the shorelines of Nov mber 30 , 1972 the city. Jun 24 , 1972 The City of Renton is required to develo through a master program for regulation of uses of December 20 , 1973 the shorelines of the city. Dec mber 21 , 1973 The Department of Ecology is required thr ugh to review the City of Renton ' s master Mar h 29 , 1974 program. Mar h 24 , 1974 The City of Renton is to make revisions thr.ugh required by the Department of Ecology and Jun: 22 , 1974 adopt the master program. 1 /:11-1 Renton Planning Department // 10-1- 73 I e,``' ,Y a F RE r ags v a „ . h . o THE CITY OF RENT®i N 4` Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 amp , BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT - °9,� 235- 2550 09�T,0 sEP1-- MEMORANDUM March 12 , 1980 TO: Randall Rockhill, Chairman Planning & Development Committee Earl Clymer John Reed FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: David R. Clemens , Senior Planner • ' RE: SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Attached are sections of the Shoreline Master Program related to docks and other structures located in above water areas. The referral from the Council requested a determination as to whether structures on piers related to single family residences would be. allowed. Based upon the sections attached, it would be our interpretation that with the exception of covered moorages ( consisting only of a roof) that structures over water would not be allowed. DRC:wr Attachment • II 1 SECTION 4 . GOALS AND POLICIES 4 ,'07 Residential Element 4 .!07 . 01 Goal : Existing residential uses are to be recognized - - - - but future residential development should optimize regulated public access to and along the shorelines , consistent with private property rights . 4 .07 02 P•olicies : _ C r�T.Yir 1^d.`4N:"6a'A2:•.�^`. ryry e LS .... ay�+cyy .g�.,y._..-.......u..T.•� _ �a jq�• x-.. ri 55 Y.e}'r.ry .e'6'G w 4+, r.•t^'s 1. ,._. d a:�S -_-�__._ .,....: h.�,.l:l�.:rt'1'lt3. ��."�ii'�3:"�t'g,; : SECTION 6 GENERAL USE REGULATIONS 6 • 0 Use Comnatibilit and Aesthetic Effects 6i. 0 . 01 The potential impact of 1 any of the following on adjacent , nearby and possibly distant land and shoreline Uset•s shall be considered in the design plans and effort tI a d e t^ ri'Vrk .64'7ryµpi8. q T . _ _ ^_ ..._. ram»--y- ,,. ,. . .; .,,:..1 . '' }' k. fence,u,... _W .n_ ..W w smokestacks . , s , '" f poles , wires , F wes , signs, lights l' , SECTION 7 SPECIFIC USr RP GULATIO!VS 7. 12 . 03 Desi n Criteria for Sin le-Famil Docks • A . Pier type (1 ) All piers and docks shall be built of o pe pile construction , except that floating docks may be permitted where there is no danger of significant damage to an ecosystem, whe ' e scenic values are high , and where one or more • of the following conditions exist : a . Extreme water depth , beyond the range of normal length piling . b . A soft bottom condition , providing little ' support for piling_. c . Ledge rock bottom that renders it not feas- ible to install piling , i.,.:,4 f,A4f`::'�. 4".' '4i'% C#L.Rh:��'' �Ap. �+li._--..—.._ �-,;,,�.,snmma?r,�^^a'r.,.+x�.rrKm; 7+ _. � .u&.:..�:m'::..s��^. 4�'Ft��rr'.�.,�r m"�}C�..urd j"' "'�-'��}! t 34/ .,•mg4,, 1.tuaidzw,....,. 4 Ai 3' It, et,i3 f� :c x 7w'r 1 • r STATE F / \�tJ�� �3-`�., 1'�F, ac .F^ i• 9 STATE O DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY �`'i``� � x WASHINGTON Olympia,Washington 98504 206/753-2800 6��, d'=1 ��'t 1889 any Dixy Lee Ray V63 Governor 1 `i July 2, 1979 t;•- �C tig® e, City Clerk City Hall 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir: Re: Adoption of Shoreline Master Program On June 22, 1979, the Department of Ecology held an emergency adoption proceeding for the purpose of incorporating into the State Master Program, Chapter 173-19 WAC, several new or re- vised local shoreline master programs which have been approved by the department. A copy of the amended regulation is enclosed• The Shoreline Master Program for your jurisdiction was adopted at the above noted proceeding. As stipulated in WAC 173-19-050, copies of the applicable program should be available at your office. These may be most conveniently obtained by contacting your planning department. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, /.1A , cszkv, Michael W. Rundlet Shorelines Management Section Shorelands Division MR:mg cc: Planning Department w/enclosure a 3 FORM OF ORDER AT TRANSMITTAL BY AGENCY H 'ING SINGLE HEAD State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (agency name) Administrative Order No. DE 79-12 (1) 1. Elmer C. Vogel, deputy director of the Department of Ecology - do promulgate and adopt at the Department of Ecology. Tracey, Washington. (place) the annexed rules relating to: Amending chapter 173-19 WAC--Shoreline Management Act of 1971--State Master Program, regarding the incorporation of local shoreline master programs and revised programs approved by the Department of Ecology into the State Master Program pursuant to RCW 90.58.030(3) (c) . (2) ALTERNATIVE A. Use only for Adoption of Permanent Rules. This action is taken pursuant to Notice No. tiled with the code reviser on . Such rules shall take effect. pursuant to RCW 34.04.040(2). . at a later date_such date being (2) ALTERNATIVE B. lke only for Adoption of Emergency Rules. I. Elmer C. Vogel. .find that an emergency exists and that the foregoing order is necessary for the preservation of the public health•safety.or general Welfare and that observance of the requirements of notice and opportunity to present views on the proposed action would be contrary to public interest. A statement of the facts constituting such emergency is: A recent ruling of the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board in the case of State v. Kitsap County, No. 78-37 (Order granting motion for partial summary judgment entered May 29, 1979), based on • the Washington State Supreme Court's decision in Harvey v. Board of County Commissioners, 90 Wn.2d 473 (1978) , has clearly established that master programs and revisions thereto are not effective until (continued on page 2) Such rules are therefore adopted as emergency rules to take effect upon tiling with the code reviser. (31 Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.04._- (1977 c 19 § 2)1 that "even agency shall incorporate the most speotie. but in no ease omit all,of the following language alternatives ushen adopting or amending rules' (till ro statement (a).(b).or (c)as appropriate): X la) This rule is promulgated pursuant to RCW 90.58.030(3) (c). 90.58.120 and 90.58.200 and is intended to.administratively implement that statute. Ibl This rule is promulgated pursuant to RCW which directs that the • ------ ---------- -- (agency) has.iuthunt\ to implement the pruvisrans of (name of act or R('11'citation) lc) This rule is promulgated under the general rule making authority of the ---------------------- ----------- - (agency) is,iut lion,ed in R( \1 .. --_-- 14) 1 lie undu_isigned hereby declares that he has complied is ith the provisions of the Open Public Meetings .Act (chapter 42 t0 R( \\), the .ldmintstr.11ne Procedure Act (chapter 34 04 R( W) or the Higher I•ducation \dnnnastr.titc Procedure Act (chapter Dili 19 R( W) as appropriate. and the State Register Act tchapter'34.0g Rt Vt 1 (s) Iles order alter being lint recorded in the order register of this agency is herewith transmitted to the Code Reyaser for tiling pursuant to ehapter 14114 RCW and chapter I 12 WA(' STATE elf' A Gf�1N June 22,-- (979 FILED „y (��.,ar � /�;=�_.�_� Elmer CJ Vogel Deputy Director JUN 2 2 1979 rule CODE REVISER'S UFFIg (Form CR-7: Effective 12/1/771 WSR r1 -n� Ci4 y h • (2) ALTERNATIVE B (continued) . . • adopted pursuant to RCW 34.04.025, regardless of whether the document has been approved by the Department of Ecology.' To preventundesirable'delay and uncertainty in local governments' administration and enforcement responsibilities under the'Shoreline Management Act, an emergency adoption of these rules in is the best public interest. Concurrent with this emergency rule adoption, the process for adoption of permanent rules is being initiated. • • • • 1 • • • -2- 1 OTS-29:4 AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19_090 ADAMS COUNTY. Adams County master program approved ((or-adapted) ) June 2, 1977. • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-100 ASOTIN COUNTY. Asotin County master program approved ((et-adopted) ) October 22, 1974. (1) Asotin master program approved ((er-adepte )) March 7, 1975. (2) Clarkston master program approved ( (er-edepted) ) March 7, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-110 BENTON COUNTY. Benton County master program approved ( (er- iepted) ) April 25, 1974. (1) Benton City master program apprcved ((er-adepted) j August 25, 1975. (2) Kennewick mister program apprcved ( (er-adepttd) ) December 11, 1974. (3) Prosser master program approved ((er-edepte3) ) June 2, 1975. (4) Richland master program approved ( (er-adapted) ) September 9, 1974. (5) West Richland master program approved ( W.-adopted) ). October 22, 1974. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-120 CHE_LAN COUNTY. Chelan County master program approved (Or-a3erted) ) April 22, 1975. (1) Cashmere master program approved ( (er--adapted)) April 22, 1975. (2) Chelan master program approved Her-adepttd)) April 22, 1?75. (3) Entiat master program approved ( (or-aapted) ) April 22, 1975. (4) Leavenworth master program approved ((er-adopted) ) April 22, 1975. (5) Wenatchee master program apprcved ( (er--adeeted) ) April 22, 1975. AMENDATORX SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-130 CLALLAM COUNTY. Clallam County mas+er program approved ( (or-adapted) ) August 5, 1976. ( (14}) ) Port Angeles master program approved ( (er--Rdepted) ) August 5, 1976. i 1 ] OTS-29:4 AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-140 CLARK COUNTY. Clark County master program approved ((er-adopted) ) December 19, 1974. (1) Camas master program approved ( (er ndepted ) ) January 30,_197d. (2) LaCenter master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) December 18, 1974. (3) Ridgefield master program approved ( (er----adepted; r) ) June 29A 1978. (4) Vancouver master program approved Her-adopted) ) September) 25, 1975: (5) Washougal master program approved ((or—adopted) ) September 12, 197U. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-150 COLUMBIA COUNTY. Columbia County master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September 22, 1975. (1) Dayton master program approved ((er-adepted) ) September 22, 1975. (2) Starbuck master program approved ((er-adepted) ) Sept,2mb'r 22, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) FiAC 173-19-163 CO4iLIT2 COUNTY. Cowlitz County master program approved ((er-adepted 7. .77. ) ) February 17, 1978. (1) Castle Rock Master program approved ( (or--=adepte ) ) (2) Kalama master program approved ( (or----adepted ) ) JanuAry_16,, 1979. (3) Kelso master program approved ( (er-edepted) ) (4) Longview master program approved ((er-adepted) ) May 19, 1977 (5) Woodland master program approved ( ( r----adepted) ) AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-170 DOUGLAS COUNTY. Douglas County master program approved ((er-adepted) ) February 20, 1975. (1) Bridgeport master program approved ((er--adopted) ) February ( (22)) 20, 1975. (2) East Wenatchee master program approved ( (er-adopted) ) Febru- ary ((pi)) 20, 1975. (3) Rock Island master program approved ((er--adepted) ) February • ( (22) ) 20, 1975. [ 2 ] OTS-29:4 • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-180 FERRY COUNTY. Ferry County master program approved ((er-adapted) ) October 21, 1975. October ((�i}) ) Republic master program approved ((er--sdepted) ) 21, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending order. DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-1,9_190 FRANKLIN COUNTY. Franklin County master prog_am approved Her--sdepted) ) December 10, 1974. ((Amended) ) Revision apppgied December 12, 1575. Revision approved August 28, 197P. Revi- ' sion approved October 2, 1978. (((4})) Pasco master program apprcved Her-adapted) ) December 13,, 1974. ( (Amended)) Revision_approved December 12, 1975. • AtIADAIOFY_SECIION (Amending Order DE 74-23, filed 12/30/74) • WAC 173-19-200 GARFIELD COUNTY. Garfield County master program approved ( (er-adapted) ) September 13, 197U, AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) ' AC 173-19_210 GRANT COUNTY. Grant County master program approved (Or-adapted) ) September 16, 1975. • (1) Krupp master program approved ((er-adapted) ) September 16, ' 1975. (2) Moses Lake master program approved ((er--adepted)) December 18, 1974. (3) Soap Lake master program apprcved ( (er-adapted) ) November 19, 1974. (4) Wilson Creek master program approved ( (er-adapted) ) September 16, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-220 GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY. Grays Harbor County master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) August 6, 1975. Revisionr_apgroved ggc=mber 2,, 1977. Revision approved July 17, 1978. (1) Aberdeen master program approved ((er-adapted) ) June 30, 1975. (2) Cosmopolis master program apprcved ((er-adapted)) August 12, 1974. (3) Elma master program approved ((er-adapted)) September 18,' 1974. (u) Hoquiam master program approved ( (er--adapted)) April 14,, 1976. (5) Montesano master program approved ((er---adapted))' (6) Oakville master program approved ((or----adapted) ) [ 3 1 OTS-29:4 y 1 (7) Ocean Shores master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) August 12, 1974. (8) Westport master program apprcved ((er-adepted)) November 7, 1974. APIENRATORY alcIIQN (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC__173-119_210 ISLAND COUNTY. Island County: master program approved ((er-adepted) ) June 25, 1976. (1) Coupeville master program apprcved ((er--adopted))" June 25', 1976. (2) Langley master program approved ((er-adopted)) June 25, 1976. (3) Oak • Harbor master program approved ( (er-adopted) ) June 25, 1976. AIIENDATCF7 SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-240 JEFFERSON COUNTY. Jefferson County master program approved ((er-adepted) ) December 20, 1974. ((14}) ) Port Townsend master prcgram approved ( (or--adopted)) • December 20, 197u. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-28, filed 10/24/77) WAC 171-19_250 KING COUNTY. King County master program apprcved ' ((or-adopted)) July 8, 1976. ((Amended)) Rev_isiQg__aarQ_v2d November 22, 1976. Revision aP2r2ved June 3C4_1978. • (1) Auburn master program approved ( (or-adepted)) April 4, 197u. (2) Beaux Arts master program approved ((er-adopted) ) August 12, 197u. (3) Bellevue master _program approved ((er-adepted) ) February 26, 1975. . (L) Black Diamond master program approved ( (er--adopted :rrrrrrr.-rrrrrr) ) December 21,, 1977. (5) Bothell master prcgram approved ((er-adopted)) February 27, , 1975. ( (amended) ) Rev_isiQn_apprgved July 24 1976. Rg_visi2n_122roved January 31, 1977. (6) Carnation master program apprcved ( (er-adopted) ) August 1E, 197u. (7) Des Moines master program approved ((or-adopted) ) April 3, 1974. . . ... . -. (8) Duvall master program approved ((er--adopted) ) August 12, • 1974. • (9) Hunts Point master program approved ((er-adopted) ) NgvInber 15,_1974. . . Revision a22r2ved July 2, 1975. (10) Issaquah Toaster program approved ((er----adopted)•) (11) Kent master program apprcved ((er-adopted)) April 9, 1974. Revisi2n_A22r2v0_22c2mbr_R4 1978. _RgYisign_a22r2ved AErii 104 1979. (12) Kirkland master program approved ( (er-adopted) ) August 27, 197u. (13) Lake Forest Park master program approved ((or-adopted)•) April 19, 1974. 1 (14) Medina master program approved ((or-adopted)). November 22, 1974. [ 4 ] � e O OTS-29:4 (15) Mercer Island master program approved ((or-adopted)) Septem- ber 24, 1974. (16) Normandy Park master program approved ((or-adapted)) April 5, 1974. (17) North Bend master program approved ((er-adopted)) September 18, 1974. (18) Pacific master program approved ((ee-adopted)) September 19,. 1974. (19) Redmond master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September 20, 1974. (20) Renton master program approved ((or-adepted)) January 23, 1976. Egyrsi.on_agproegd_lebruary 234_1977. (21) Seattle master program approved ((et--adopted) ) June 34, . 1976. ( (hmeaded)) Rgv_ ,sion_apsrgved March 11, 1977. (22) Skykomish master program approved ((er---adeptd) ) (23) Snogualmie master program approved ((or-adopted) ) August 16, 1974. 26 ' (24) Tukwila master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September , 1974. roved o tad March ' (25) Yarrow Point master program approved ((or--ad p ) > 13, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (hmending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC_ 173=19_260 KISSAP COUNTY. Kitsap County . master program! • approved .((or-adapted) ) April 30, 1976. ggvisign_agprgved October 24�I 1977. ' (1) Bremerton master program approved ((or----adopte61 ss..a ) ) Ja.L'larY__1s_197o.,_,_Re_v�,sign_aur2ved March 3,, 1478. Rexisi2n_ap2r2ve1 June_,�81_1378,, Revision approved August 22, 1978. giyisioLc_aLp=gvs3OctQber 24,, 1978. (2) Port. Orchard master program approved ((or-adopted)) March 10, 1977. (3) Poulsbo master program approved ((or-adopted)) January 12, 1976. ( (,ended) ) Esv_islgr_,__apprg_ved October 21, 1976. Revision au rRved_Qctgber_2ut_1977. (4) Winslow master program approved ((or---adopted)) • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-270 KITTITAS COUNTY. Kittitas County master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September 3, 1975. (1) Cle Elum master program approved ( (er---adepte3)): (2) Ellensburg master program approved ((er---adapted)) (3) South Cle Elum master program approved ((or-adopted)) June, 28, 1976. AMENDATORX SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-283 KLICKITAT COUNTY. Klickitat County master program approved ((or-adopted) ) August 29, 1975. 5 OTS-29:4 • (1) Bingen master program approved ((er--adepted) ) August 29, 1975. (2) Goldendale master program approved ((er-adepted) ) August 29; 1975. (3) White Salmon master program approved ((er--adopted)) August 29, 1975. • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173=19-290 'LEWIS COUNTY: Lewis "County master program approved ((or-edepted) ) November 1, 1974. Rgv_isiga__apprgved January 16l1978_ (1) . Centralia master program approved ((er---adepted cs:reias ' ) ) March'_294_1970. (2) Chehalis master program approved ((er-adepted) ) February 10, 1977. (4) Pe Ell) Masterbprogram apper roved ((er--adepted)) ( (Novembers 15d (,._)._ program approvedp �- 1974. , (5) Toledo master program approved ( (er-adepted)) November 1, 1974. (6) Vader master program approved ((er-adepted )) October 244. 1977. (7) Winlock master program approved ((er----3epted ) ) OctQper 244 1977. ((f9}---Meeayreek---master---program----approved----er----adepted • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-300 LINCOLN COUNTY. Lincoln County master program approved ((er-adepted) ) February 25, 1977. (1) Odessa master program approved ( (er----adep±od s...:::) ) February_254_1577. (2) Sprague master program approved ((or---adepted ) ) February_25,, 1977. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 76-15, filed 5/3/76) WAC 173-19-310 MASON COUNTY. Mason County master program approved ((er-adepted) ) August 6, 1975. ((Amended)) Revisionaprroved • December 18, 1975. ((li})) Shelton master program approved ((er-adepted) ) March 18, 1975. ( (Amended)) $evision_apprg_ved December 18, 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order. DE 76-15,. filed 5/3/76) WAC_173-19-1Z0 OKANOGAN COUNTY. Okanogan master program approved ((er-adepted)) Dgcembgr 164 1975. Rg_visign_approv_ed March 9, 1976. 6 ] OTS-29:4 • (1) Brewster master program approved ((er-adepted)) December 16j 19754._ Rgv_ision Approved March 9, 1976. (2) Conconully master program approved ((er-adepted) ) December 1g,`1975=_ R2visign_apFroved March 9, 1976. (3) Okanogan master program approved ((er-adopted) ) December 16s 1975,_ Pevision_approved March 9, 1976. (4) Omak master program approved ((or-adapted) ) December 16, 1975, Revision_apprgved March 9, 1976. • (5) Oroville master program approved ((er-adopted) ) Dec2mbeL__16,. 1975:__Dgv_is1Qn_appF.Qvgd March 9, 1976. (6) Pateros master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) December_16, 1975,.__Dg_vi2i2n_ao-grcvgd March 9, 1976. (7) Riverside master program apprcved ( (er-adepted) ) December 16s 1225m__Rgvisicn_122E2y$d March 9, 1976. (8) Tonasket master program approved ((er-a lepted) ) December 16, 1975,,__Dev_,is, gn_apprQved March 9, 1976. • (9) Twisp master program apprcved ( (or-adopted) ) December 16, 197 . _DgvisignapgrQved March 9, 1976. (10) Winthrop master program apprcved ( (er-adopted) ) December_1l 1975i__Dgvisign_agpLovgd March 9, 1976. Devigian_ porovgd_February_2,, 1979_ AMENDATORY SECIION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-330 PACIFIC COUNTY. Pacific County master program approved Her-adapted) ) April 8, 1975. • (1) Ilwaco master program approved ((er-adepmed) ) May 2, 1975. (2) Long Beach master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) May .2, 1975. (3) Raymond master program approved Her--adepted )1 , A2ri1_9,. 1976. (4) South Pend master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) May 2, , 1975. ARDNDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-340 PEND OREILLE COUNTY. Pend Oreille County master program approved ( (er-adepted) ) April 18, 1975. (1) Cusick master program apprcved ( (er-adepted) ) April 18, 1975. (2) Ione master program approved ( (er-adepted)) April 18, 1975. (3) Metaline master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) April 18, 1975. (u) Metaline Falls master program approved ((er--adepted) ) April 18, (5) Newport master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) April 18,. 1975. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-357 PIERCE COUNTY. Pierce County master program approved ((or-adepted) ) April u, 1975. ((hmeeded)) Revision approved November 16, 1976. Revision approved October 26, 1977. Revision anFpQved February 21, 1979. Revision approved June 11i1979_ (1) Bonney Lake master program approved ((or-adepted) ) August 6, 1975. [ 7 ] tl OTS-29:4 (2) Buckley master program approved ((or-adopted)) April 7, 1975. 1 (3) Dupont master program approved ((or-adopted)) June 11, 1975. (4) Eatcnville. master program apprcved ((er-adopted)) April -29, 1975.' (5) Fife ' master program. approved ( (or-adopted) ) Septemb'er• 6, 1974. (61 Gig Harbor master program apprcved ((or--adopted) ) ' September, 13, 1975. (7) Orting master program approved ( (or-adopted)) April 8, 1975. 1 i (8) Puyallup master program approved ((or-adopted)) May 31, 1974. (9) Roy master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) April 9, 1975. (10) Ruston master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September 20, 1974. (11) South Prairie master program approved ((er---adopted)) 1 1 (12) Steilaccom master program approved ((or--adopted) ), (13) •Sumner master program aFproved ((or-adopted)) December 11, 1974. ' I (14) Tacoma master program approved ((or-adopted)) April 5, 1977. (15) ' • Hilkeson ' master program approved ((er---adopted)) I • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-360 • 'SAN JUAN COUNTY. San Juan County master_ program approved ( (or--adopted)) Nay 28, 1976. ((emended)) Reyission_apggov_d October 29, 1976. • ( (fWr) ) Friday Harbor master, program approved ((er--adopted ) ) Juiy_141' 1978. Rtvision apgrovld January 5, 1979. 1 AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173,19_370 SKAGIT COUNTY. Skagit County master program apprcved ( (e.r-►depted)') 'October 5, 1976. Revision an2r2ved January 94 I ' 1379. Revision aiproved May 11, 1979. (1) Anacortes master program approved ((er--adopted) ) April 9, 1976. 1 (2) Concrete master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) Ma:ch ?, 1977. (3) Hamilton master program approved ((or----adopted)) (4) La Connor master program apprcved ( (er-adopted) ) May 3, 1977. (5) Lyman master program approved ( (er-adapted) ) February 23, (6) Mount Vernon master program approved ( (or-adepted) ) May 16, 1977. I AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 74-23, filed 12/30/74) 1 SAC 173-19-383 SKAMANIA COUNTY. Skamania County master program approved ((or-adapted) ) September 6, 1974. 1 (1) North Bonneville master program approved ((or-adopted)) Sep- tember 6, 1974. 1 [ 8 ] I 1 I 1 OTS-29:4 (2) Stevenson master program apprcved ( (er-sdepted)) September 6, 1974. • afENDATQRg_6I2/7ION (Amending Order DE 78-9, filed 7/26/78) WAC 171:19-392 SNOHOMISH COUNTY. Snohomish County master program approved ((er-edepted)) December 27, 1574. Revisdpyapproved June 16, 1228: (1) Arlington master program apprcved ( (or-adopted)) December 27, 1974. • (2) Brier master program apprcved ( (er=adopted) ) December 27, 1974. (3) Edmonds master program approved ((er--adopted) ) January 23, 1976. Revis}cn_222r4ved Match a, 1979. (4) Everett master program approved ((er-adopted) ) January, 5, , • 1976. (5) Gold Bar master program approved ((er-adopted)) December 27, 1974. (6) Granite Falls master program approved ((er-adopted) ) December 27, 1974. (7) Index master program apprcved ( (er-adopted) ) December 27, 1974. (9) Lake Stevens master program approved ((er-adapted) ) December 27, 1974. (9) Marysville master program apprcved ((er-adopted)) January 22, 1975. ( (Amenied-Regaat-497-4999)) Altenialiv2_adgp±gd_Ju12_18L_1978. . (10) Monroe master program apprcved ( (or-adopted) ) December 27, 1974. (11) Mountlake Terrace master program approved ( (er--adopted) ) December 27, 1974. (12) Mukilteo master program approved ((or-adopted) ) September 20, 1974. (13) Snohomish master program approved ((er--adopted) ) September 20, 197u. Rgvl5i4nepF122gd February_11, 1977_ (14) Stanwood master program approved ((or-adopted) ) April 9, 1976. (15) Sultan master program approved ((or-adopted)) December •27, 1974. (16) Woodway master program apprcved ( (er-adopted) ) December 27, 1974. LMLNDATORI SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) RAC 173-19-400 SPCKANE COUNTY. Spokane County master program approved ((ee-adopted) ) January 15, 1975. sgvysign_agprg_ved_September 6, 1977. (1) Latch master program approved ( (er-adopted) ) January' 15, 1975. (2) Medical Lake master program approved ((er--adopted) ) January 15, 1975. (3) Rockford master program approved ( (er-adopted)) January 15, 1975_ (4) Millwood master program approved ((or-edepeed) ) . January 15, 1975. (5) Spokane master program approved ((er-adopted)) March 7, 1975. ( (Amended) ) R6v_isi2n__a2E=Qved October 5, 1976. gevision approved December 1977. (6) Waverly master program approved ((or--adapted) ) January . 15, 1975. 9 • OTS-29:4 1 AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 74-23, filed 12/30/74) WAC_ 1733719_410 STEVENS COUNTY. Stevens County master program approved ((er-adopted) ) (1) Chevelah master program approved ((er----adapted)) (2) Northport master program approved ( (er---adapted))' AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-420 THURSTON COUNTY. Thurston County master program approved ( (er--edepted)) May 21, 1976. ((Amended) ) Revisionapproved q August 27, 1976. (1) Bucoda master program approved ( (er-adopted)) May 21, 1976. (2) Lacey master program approved ( (or-adopted) ) May 21, 1976. (3) Olympia master program approved ((er-edepted)) May 21, 1976. (4) Tenino master program approved Her-adepted)) May 21, 1976. (5) Tumweter master program approved ((er-adapted) ) May 21, 1976. (6) Yelm master, program approved ((or-adepted)) May 21, 1976. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WA: 173-19-430 WAHKIAKUM COUNTY. Wahkiakum County master program approved ((er-adopted) ) June 17, 1975. ((f)) ) Cathlamet master program approved ((er-edepeed) ) June 17, 1975. AMENDATORY SEC.TICN (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77). WAC 173-19-L40 WALLA WALLA COUNTY. Walla Walla County master program approved ((er-edepted) ) May 2, 1975. (1) Waitsburg master program approved ((er-adepted)) May 25, 1976. (2) Walla Walla master program approved ((or--adopted) ) February 23, 1977. • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 77-16, filed 9/9/77) WAC 173-19-450 WHATCOM COUNTY. Whatcom County master program approved ((Or-adapted-September) ) August 27, 1976. ((Amended) ) Revi- sion_approved April 11, 1977. Rg_visiog_appro_vg6_Augus& 11, 1976_ (1) Bellingham master program approved ((or-edopted)) September 30, 1974. (2) Blaine master program approved ((er-adopted) ) September 29, 1975. Revisicn__Appgo_vgdlugust 33, 1977. Revision approved December 28, 1978. (3) Everson master program approved ((et-adopted)) September 29, 1975. (4) Ferndale master program approved ((er---edepted) ) [ 10 ; • • OTS-29:4 (5) Lynden master program approved ((er-adapted)) September 29, 1975. • (6) Nooksack master program approved ((er-adapted) ) September 29, 1975. (7) Sumas master program approved ((er-adapted)) September 29,, • 1975. Al N2AT02/_SEZION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) WAC 173-19-46Q WHITMAN COUNTY. Whitman County master program approved ((er-adapted) ) February 6, 1975. (1) Albion master program approved ((er-adapted)) February 6, 1975. (2) Colfax•master program approved ((er--edepted) ) February 6, 1975. (3) .Malden master •program ' apprcved ((er-adapted)) February 6, ' 1975. (4) Palouse master program approved ((er--adapted) ) February 6, 1975. (5) Pullman master program apprcved ( (er-adepted)) February 6, 1975. (6) Rosalie master program approved ((er--adopted) ) February 6, 1975. • approved ( (er-ade ted February6, (7) Tekoa master program p )) 1975. • • • AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order DE 75-21, filed 8/12/75) • WAC_ 173-19-470 YAKIMA COUNTY. Yakima County master program approved ((er-edepted) ) September 5, 1574. Revisign_agaoved Sept_m_ ber 8, 1977. (1) Grandview master program apprcved ( (or-adopted) ) September 5, 1974. • (2) Granger master program approved ((er-adepted)) September ' 5, 1974. (3) Naches master program apprcved ( (er-adepted) ) September 5, 1974. (4) Selah master program approved ((er--adopted)) September 5, 1974. (5) Union Gap master program apprcved ( (er-adapted) ) September 5, 1974. (6) Yakima master program apprcved ( (er-adepted) ) September 5, 1974. (7) Zillah master program approved ((or--edepted) ) September 5, 1974. • • E 11 1 • • RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT Date: August 21, 1978 TO: Council Members FROM: Community Services Committee RE :' . Request of Port Quendall (Don Norman) for change in the Shoreline Master Program The. alove request has been reviewed by the Community Services Commi tee and the City Attorney has indicated that .amendments to. the Shoire ine Master Program are initially subject to review and recjom endation by the Planning Commission . The Community Services Committee therefore recommends that the above noted request be referred to the Planning Commission . Attachment - I I I 1 Patri is Seymour-Thorpe , Chairwoman I . Richa d Stredicke Tholma Trimm } a z e „ • • G. . .E. . OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY a RENTON,WASHINGTON A o ch ® POST OFFICE BOX 626 700 2nd AVENUE BUILDING 0 RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 Z55-8678 p �Q- LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, •SSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 991E • ' SEP,- July 18 , 1978 MEMORANDUM TO : Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director FRO1 : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney , RE: Amendments to the Shoreline Master Program Dea Gordon: This letter is in response to your memo to me concerning the abo. e captioned topic . The asic question to be decided is whether or not the Shoreline Master Program is similar to the Comprehensive Plan, therefor gran ing jurisdiction to change the Master Program to the Planning Commission rather than the Hearing Examiner. In order to make this decision it is necessary to review the Ordinance and ,its plac ment in our Code . The placement in the Code and the intent of t e Master Program would seem to dictate that the Master Program is a long range planning tool rather than a specific use patt rn, such as a zoning ordinance, and therefore , that the changes would appr priately be before the Planning Commission. You ave brought up the issue of the Hearing Examiner hearing vari nces and that this might present a problem if the Hearing Examiner was also to decide the changes in the Shoreline Master Program. I do . not see the conflict and believe that none exists . If' y u have a specific example where you believe a conflict exists , perh ps you could enlighten me . In my opinion, the responsibility for making changes in the Shoreline Mast r Program should be with the Planning Commission rather than the earing Examiner . While I realize that the ordinance changed the words "Planning Commission" to "Hearing Examiner" , I am su e the intent was not to cover an instance such as this . It probably would be wise to review the ordinance , changing the jurisdicti n to corre t that change if the Council believes it necessary. My opinion is based upon my decision that a change in the Shoreline Maste Program is similar to a change in the Comprehensive Flan and therefore should be handled by the Planning Commission. J Shoul you require further inforati.on on this plc,, please feel free o contact me . /�� ri,A,--( ,,e-(-:. -7,--, t / a..rence J. Warden - 0—t...--,1 i H LJWI:n cc ayor, Council President, Joan Walker, ick Beeler, Community Services Co_mm_ ittee Chairman , Del Mead i RentonlCi y Council 8/21/78 Page 3 Old Basin ss - Cont. i Block Gra t Community Services Committee Chairwoman Thorpe submitted far Programs information only summary of Block Grant Programs currently in process within the City. Councilman Perry inquired as to the members of the Housing and Community Development 1979 Citizens' Advisory Committee residing within city limits. Councilwoman Thorpe noted committee members are citizens ,of the city, mainly from within the core area. Joint Projects- Community Services Committee report recommended council concurrence Block Gra t on a priority basis for proposed joint project funding by the Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program: Ce ar River Trail System, Neighborhood Strategy Area Program, GreeniRiver Basin Program, Cascade Neighborhood Park, and East Valley Good Neighbor Center. After discussion MOVED BY STREDICKE, 'SE OND THORPE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ShorelIine Master Community Services Committee report was read which recommended Program request of Port Quendall (Don Norman) for change in the *reline Master Program be referred to the Planning Commission. MOVED ! BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN COMMITEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Fire Pirolection Councilwoman Thorpe noted previous agreement with Fire Ditr. 40 Southeas , of and questioned the ability of the city to cover the expanding City i southeast end of the city. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND S;TREDtCKE'' i THAT MATTER OF FIRE PROTECTION IN THE. SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE CITY BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Senior Citizen's Councilwoman Thorpe noted that there are citizens who would like Center F nding- to contribute to funding and development of the Senior Citizen's Donation Center. Councilman Stredicke questioned a member from th Senior Center, instead of the city, handle his matter and possible raise money for the center. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE THAT CONSIDERATION OF THE SENIOR CENTER FUND BE REFERRED TO THE SENIOR CENTER BUILDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Street Councilwoman Thorpe suggested review of present city procedures re Vacation. city street vacations. Motion by Thorpe that matteriof, procedures and conditions be referred, to the Ways and Means Committee. Motion failed for lack of second. Forward hrust Councilwoman Thorpe noted lack of discussion re Resolution #2205 Projects ' adopted August 14, 1978 re forward thrust project listin0 change. Mr. Gonnason explained that the resolution designating SR 515. as a forward thrust project enabling Council to use forward Ithrust funds on the city' s portion of that project is so desire Motion by Thorpe that matter for forward thrust funds be reconsidered and referred back to Ways and Means Committee. Failed for lack of second. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record ;abcut three months ago he requested information about forward, thrust projects and recalled previous listing, because of Seattle's problems. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO RECESS, 9:55 P.M. CARRIED. Reconvened at 10:10 P.M. Roll Call : All council members present as previously listed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO SUSPEND RULES AND HEAR AT THIS TIME THE CORRESPONDENCE RE KENNYDALE-HIGHGATE. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH TO AMEND MOTION AND INCLUDE CORRESPONDENCE RE PROPOSED POLICIES ELEMENT STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED. ' Renton .City.Council 8/21/78 page 4 Old Business - Cont. Environmental ' Letter from Mr. Dave Biggar, President, Kennydale Community Club Impact requesting the City Council to consider area concern to minimize the adverse environmental impact of currently planned and future housing developments throughout Renton, especially Kennydale. Councilman Perry noted Highgate matter and appeal will be before council September 11. Planning and Development Committee will be reviewing Thursday, August 24. Mr. Dave Biggar noted for residences of Kennydale that all interested persons are invited to attend Thurs. Committee meeting. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO REFER LETTER TO 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. I Requirements for Letter from Mr. Dave Biggar, President, Kennydale Community Club Hook-Up to ''I re requirements to 'hook-up' to sanitary sewers. MOVED BY SHANE, Sanitary Sewers SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Substitute motion by Thorpe to refer to Planning and Development Committee. Motion failed for lack of second. Environmental Petition with 93 signatures re environmental impact protesting the Inpact Petition environmental 'declaration of Non-Significance' as recommended by the Land Use Hearing Examiner re proposed Highgate Development and requested public hearing to discuss state of environmental impact. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND THORPE TO REFER TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Proposed Policies Letter from Joan A. Walker, Chairman Planning Commission presented Element Statement proposed Policies Element statement of the Comprehensive Plan as prepared and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Upon commendation by council Ms. Walker noted • the great deal of time spent by the Planning Commission,staff, and community. Request re Councilman Stredicke requested recommendation from the Public Works City Owned Director on the disposition of city owned property and pumping station Property 1 on Jones Ave. near 20th St. and plans for use or development. City Councilman Stredicke complimented the administration for placing Spending a freeze on the city spending at this time. Rules and MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE THAT MATTER OF RULES GOVERNING Ordinances COUNCIL MEETINGS INSTEAD OF ORDINANCES BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND Governing MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. MOTION BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE TO Council Meetings ALSO REFER SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Water System MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM TO SUSPEND RULES AND HEAR AT THIS TIME Inter-ties THE CORRESPONDENCE RE WATER SYSTEM INTER-TIES WITH KENT AND TUKWILA. i CARRIED. Letter from Warren C. Gonnason, Director of PubliciWorks, requesting approval of water system inter-ties with Kent and Tukwila to meet requirements for appropriate fire flow in the Benaroya Business Park Development on SW 43rd St. Motion by Shane, Second Perry to concur in recommendation of Public Works Director. Mr. Gonnason explained facilities will be constructed by the Benaroya Co. , but will be facilities of the City of Renton, jointly operated by the cities of Renton, Kent, and Tukwila. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired I as to cost, staff time involved, and who will maintain. Mr. Gonnason explained request by Benaroya to be reimbursed for part of the facilities, and will be relatively maintenance free with the agree- ment providing for the costs to be shared by the h city's involved. Councilwoman Shinpoch noted request is only for an agreementito be drawn up. Asst. City Attorney, Kellogg, advised council of implica- tions of approving agreement without details. Councilman Clymer inquired if ,the work had started on the project. Mr. Gonnason noted detailed plans have been prepared with no construction at this time. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER TO MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE WITH CONSULTATION WITH CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. 1 i i • .�V 1 / / swreof February 23, 1977 ;Ahinl;ir) • ()1 I:kc'(.)O The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti Mayor, City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mi11 Avenue South Renton, Wasnington 93055 Dear Mayor Delaurenti : The Department of Ecology has reviewed the City of Renton 's propos-d shoreline amendments which substitute the Planning Commission with the Hearing Examiner (Ordinance 14o. 3094) and modifies the fee schedule for shoreline substantial development applications (Ordin- ance No. 3097) . In reviewing the proposed amendments , the staff found both amend- ments to be consistent with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and with the intent of the Shoreline Management ActJ The proposed amendments are hereby approved. Sincerely, Marvin L. Vi al l e Assistant Director Office of Land Programs MLV:kb cc: Nan Reed, Department of Ecology - Redmond Office _Gordon Erickson, Planning Director _ 4%.,Vi';.7.4--::1''' ® TH CITY OF RENTON A MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTOI` , WASH. 98055 o� E;CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT S� 0k- 235-2550 O.p ,,,,It SFP January 31, 1977 t. Rodney Mack Shoreline Management Division Department of Ecology , lympia, Washington 98504 RE : SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM ear Mr. Mack: , Idle City of Renton has adopted the attached Shoreline Master rogram, March 1976 edition, by reference (Ordinance No. 3094 sttached) . This ordinance also amended the Master Program to ' nJubstitute the "Planning Commission" with "Hearing Examiner" . he substitution is in conformance with the other ordinances adf the city as the Hearing Examiner is now responsible foi- sdministrative duties of the Planning Commission in the 3horeline Master Program. Another amendment (Ordinance No . 097 attached) has modified the fee schedule for shoreline ubstantial development applications. These amendments are submitted for review as required by Sec- ion 19 of the , Shoreline Management Act of 1971, as amended. `hould you have any questions , please contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director /,i z( ,, . L r�1/9_24 Gary R. Kruger Senior Planner 7:ms Attachments • ) ) • • CITY OF RENTON , '4ASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 3097 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , AMTNpING • CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO'. 3094 RELATING TO THF ADOPTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THf-11-SHORT,LINE MASTER PROGRAM" BY REFERENCE AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHIGTON, DO ORDAIN AS ,F0 LOWS : SECTION f : . . Existing Section 2 . 02 . 01 of the SHORELINE MASTER .'ROGRAM heretofore adopted by reference by Ordinance No . ' 094 • is here y amended to read as follows as to fees : Fee Value of DeveloDment $50 . 00 Less than $10 , 000 . 00 • $100 . 00 $10 , 000 but less than $50 000 • $iso . 00 $50 ,000 .to $100 , 000 $200 . 00 plus 0 . 01% of More than $100 , 000 value over $100 , 000 The ...remainder of Section 2 . 02 . 01 relating to application forms shall remain in fu1 . force and effect . • SECTION II: Any and al] Ordinances or parts of Ordinances _ . in cOntlict herewith are hereby repealed . • SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its • passge, approval and five days after its publication. • 13`f." '.111-r, CITY COIJNCI I, I.jL 17th , 977 . • _,Zet-teet-'7 L'• !..I.,.\\./H.)r; t!, 7 t-.11 ,•:.;•,/ 0; Ma%;:or Appnx? _ (1 as to ..l. r1*;,tv. ey: PuhiLat,ion : --21-77 -c4\ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. '3(l 9 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , ADOPTING AND ESTABLISHING BY REFERENCE THE "SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM" , REPEALING ANY ANI) ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS not less than three ( 3) printed copies in, book form of the "SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM" as issued and prepared by City of Renton Planning Department under date of March, 1976 , have her tofore been filed and are now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Renton for use and examination by the general public, and WHEREAS it is deemed advisable and in the public i terest To adopt said Master Program as hereinabove described , by reference, ' NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON DO ORDAIN AS. FBI LOWS : SECTION I : The "SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM" as issued an , prepared by City of Renton Planning Department, of which not le. s than three ( 3) printed copies in book form have heretofore ben filed and are now on file in the office of the City Clerk !an1 made available for examination by the general public , is hereby .adopted as the "Shoreline Master Program" by the City of Renton. S CTIOiV II : ,lAny and all amendments , additions or mods~ t lcctiosl:; to said Master Pro gram,when printed and filed with the Ci i y Clerk of the City of Renton by authors.; atioIi of. the `:i-`y Council from time to time, shall he considered and accepted and con3titut42 a part of such Master Program without the necessity of further acoption of such amendments , modifications or additions by the legislative authority of the City of Penton or by Ordinance. -1- SECTION III : The City Clerk i hereby authorized and directed to duly authenticate and record a copy of. the abovenentioned 'SliOREL1NE MASTER PROGRAM"together with any amen(i)rtonts or a it ltians thereto, together with an authenticated copy of this Ordinance. SECTION IV : Whenever reference is made in said 'Shoreline Master Program" to the term "Planning Cornml`,aicn" the term "Hearing Examiner" shall he substituted therefor. SECTION V: Any and all Ordinances or part:, of Ordinances SECTION in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, including Charter 25 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . '1628 entitled "Co e of General Ordinances of the City of Renton. " SECTION VI : This Ordinance shall be effective upa i its j. 'sage ar:d five days after itspub:1i at:ion. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL This lOthd'aY of. Januar.: , ].977 . l'.c.:1.orr_, A. ['iciad, APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of January , 1977 . . :1t;p1'0 . _ :.'. ..u.; -to form: /97.„4" .� Aflor,npy 14--77 . ., . ?ve__ - __- Q ,Plann ng--D epar m:nt, CAI. • NO •J]no ( game laa 312,', ,�( 'pririnted c9°.jes ll1 °''° i1 ' 1. hgav',e hheretofore been:file. ,and f- "r.e noo on.file,in the :offce of.the City;,Glerk and- 'j i 'e•-..,. . +made availabJe�for�e��x�a"mma- Affidavit ofPublication itc.) bythe,general,pwbl ereby` ado,pt•ed as the, ..,,�ShoreM ,M'a'ter Program 'STATE OF WASHINGTON • ;by`tSEOTI of ento�n COUNTY OF KING ss• > ;,r:;SECTION II:Any°andall amend eats„ dditions or. Cmodrfrcatlons$to said Master,: ,'•Program. when•;9rmted'a d ;.filed'Ai,� ihe.'City Clef+,of-�t e•. ,L.3 •b a r a CamDaFne y - 'Ci Oaf+lRerifonbjil h°� 4'" beingfirst duly sworn on _-_ �tion of the.City4,,W ilyfr rn :.timeto`ti`'�;`g•'shiait b'e°t"con=• S�18 chief Cleric slnstitt;and>,acce tf su h oath,deposes and says that + is the of �• ,��,,,�„r,�,}.,;�;.Y,,�,r„ .PR.R�,n.w:�",- TH RE• I TON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) eonser,Pt a pai;t°f s.uce -,,Masse"' Progra•,in„. .th ut the times a Week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and s°r" ;,s necessity of,further adoption, has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred r +r ti ° "g A'.- of,<sueh amendments mod.. to, p irate and published in the English language continually as a news- �t C 8flt':=d a~ '- tee: '"rfication"s.or ad tiorimby the; paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, .:• �aaw and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained f flegitsla ive" 'a thortty�,of the' r,Oftysoic;,R;elmtom o+r, b,y at the afdresaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton �(Ordiriarice:�f'ff'�f?> '��`"�' "'`'Recd'rd-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the - z Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, erk is IO�Nt 11? e Gritd Clerk;is^hereby authonzed;. Washington.That the annexed is a �`.�t r1ri 12G e °IO• thenti+ate and reco�iafcopy ,, a .,; 40R-the aboyemen`tioned ' ,;+;CITY OF RENTO; '" '°°S'HORELINEi MASTER t :.•:-••-WASHINGTO 1,,L�..,:PROGRAM" gether w th;.. ii ORDINANCE,NO Ii a n•y a+pn,e'n d m,e.r1 t s go r as it was published,in regular issues(and AN ORDINANC •'- --additions thereto.$ogether a - not in su plement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ; THE CITY OF;REN O With,an aufhenfrcated copy .'W,AiSH.I:N.ar, N -,;:�:° of"tl is.Ordmancek,,..,y" 4.-- A' 1 N N G,'A' .D-'" .'w''SECTION<IV`Wheraever.<4 ? D',O.P t- . ES TABLISHINGi.BY, reference:is;made.'rnrsaid.' of I t'Tie consecutive issues,commencing on the ii P ram,;} :. 'RE F E R E N C E,`FH.E "Shoreline Nlasfer Prog am;i? ni "SHORELINE•MASTER to the terrni-7Plann ng.Gom ;: ?t�l ay of January 19 7 ;PROGRAM;"-.REPEAL #mission ttie term3?;l(earring ,and ending the ING ANY AND A.L'124trF; Examiner' shall be ORDINANCES..'O R:),-.4!-`stituted therefor: ,`; . P -A R T:,-S•-,,O' 'F '''w '` SECTION;V:Any aphiall, da , ORDINANCES,IN GO.N--'': "Ordiri;ance-s.,;or-=pa tss.of; 19 both dates FLICT HEREWITH ;t Ordiria'nces m'cor}f, ct., inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- g`1 WHEREAS-NO7LESS; herewrth'0areV�hereby�re scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee lc,THAN'THREE:(3),.printed.-_'repealed;)i�nc�uding3 Chapter copies in_book'form of the 25'of f1111 N(BurldFng,Regf,. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ , • I which SHORELINE MASTER ul'ations)' of. Ordinance'No. has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the P spared y as issued'and, ..]•ener l/Ordi'.ed .Cgde,;of -',- has and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent ''`Plannind-by.City'ef'Renton ';GeneraRentohance_saof4he,; inselition, Plarining Department under'',eity.of Renton . 0` • date`of March, 1976;.have . .,S.E:C.T.I;O N.Y,1::•Th'i's • ,';heretofore:been',,led`and Ordinance shall be'effective` ,2.a..-n-'6-4.-i-a/ ,(4;;. cL.0 . tare now.on file inth .officeof' ;upon;its;passage,�ancJ 116. i ' I' the'Ciity`Clerk of t e Cityiof days after�its publication , Ctll£'{ c3 s R"ento'n "for u e a-n•d -PASSED BYyTHE' IIY+I, e ?i examination by.the'generel COUNCIL'This.1 g1461ay,of:•. „ ry'i 1,97,7• --t —,Nos-,.:.-, y.., ,;public,and , ., Janua.'., :r;, �: , r ' =WHEREAS`it.is:deemed 'w .--' .: }Delores A. Mead, ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3- l- dayof f 'Y ryadvisable•and.in 3tie`qutilic=�- <y��..,. ')„ �- SCi1y,,Glerk� • S{r interest;to adopt said Master.:. ,,;AFP,.,RO.VEDP`? .1 H[E ;a;,;a a zti 19.�� g , . Program asihereinabove Y 1 "` • ,: MA Ofrifiie'“ ).th,day bf: ,; a , :dgscribed.bpdference, Janna '" ., acles' ;NQVII-THERER RE; :;= Cfiarles'JrDelaurenfi • •';•THE,CIT1!-COI NCIL1,: ':i":`- Notary Public ' and for the State of W in ton, THE CITI,OF RENTON DO'„jcepproved•as`tolform ,`=. , residing at Kent, Ki County. ' ORDAIN AS FOL 'OWS `� Ge-rar for Shellan r 'y II s SE'CTIO;N .; ,`The C.„•, .,omeyu 'Ss: �--li SHORELINE ,ASTER ' '`'Published,in theRenton`` "PROGRAM"_as issued-and; 'R.ecord-Chr"onicle`January. ; —Passe by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill effective June = :preparectby City,,ef Renton' 14,'197$t;R4131- ;;;��;,�:r,;,v, 9th, 1955. h tr I I —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • II V.P.C.Form No.87 A,:', ,g.--e---4-- , :, 4(i6=7_:71 ' ..`�F R,c,1� `� • TI �3 CITY OF RENTON N\,, c) ®4 '' 1'_ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 f Q Z o will i?f:'.'.• °) CHARLES J. DELAURENTi MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD 1)A • CITY CLERK O,p4r6-O SEPZF��,s H December 21 , 1976 . Hillis, Phillips , Cairncross , Clark & Martin Law Offices - '403 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104 . . Attention: Mr. John E. Phillips , Re: Shoreline Management Permit - Port Quendall - Objection to_ Proposed • Fee Schedule Dear Mr. Phillips: • The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of December 20, 1976, has referred your letter to the Finance and Personnel , Committee for recommendation. Councilman Bill Grant is Chairman of the Committee. . We shall advise you of further action taken by the Council . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON 44/ q - Delores A. Mead City Clerk . • h. cc: Mayor ' - Council President Planning Director Finance Director _. , '.,, '1'ytt':f3n"a' • Mr; '+ o `don erickson December er' E, 1976 Page Two • • without a reasonable limitation so that we may have an opportunity to present,; our client's position to the Council. . , Thank you • • Ve y t yours, 1 �'r`V',�;'7�.,jdaf�:"•'', •>.;v:„y,.. :tY- .°S.a.,. s.cy,F'::,; - ,1 ., .• ohn E. Philli s • ; 'j<? • JEP/db ' , ; • • cc: Charles J. 'telaurenti, Mayor • William Grant, Renton City Council Gerard Shellan, •• Renton City Attorney '.;` Port' Quendall `,,; •• • • I . - A . . f1: 1'i • . .4 4 , ; . . ' . ,,,:: • ;,••• '' '.' Nn .,., . C .A . ( r,L. ,,, - . , • %"*.•••••••.......!. .4.... ;:;',,,1:: „ , . • . ' LAW O ,, . - . . • ' " FFICES OF • ' • ' - ' (/,, ,,L,:,';';!.;•••:'•:-.‘';:••••' '.. . , . I• . . . ,'I• ;2', . HiLLIS.,:.PHILLIP,S;:CAIRNCROS$, CLARK & MARTIN I -/.:1724?,-:yr.:. .7, ..,. i• .. ... . •1 • ! 3USAN ,.AGip • ,A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION R‘EITR 4.pycK . . .N.RAYM0ND cAIRNCR.056 .. 403 COLUMBIA STREET 6,23-1745-..., : , ,•,. ,' . AREA CODE 0e. , . . .. , mARK 6.cLARK .. . • „ SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 . .• ..)Eome.L.HILLIS . . GEOPGEW.MARTIN, ' , . • , . , . , . • ' LOUTS O.PETERSON . • . .. . • . JqHN E.RI-BLU .,RS . . , • STEVAI, D.PHILLIPS .. Deiced7bs.er 8 p, 1976 . RICHARD R.WiLsofi • . . . .. . 'i . - ' • , ' . . ' • •• . • . • . , • 1 . . • • , . . . . . . ' . . . 1, • • : , ., ,, , . . . . . , . ..... . . , • , . .. . ' . • . . '. 1 • ' , .. • .... . . . , ... . -.-zqr., oraca Ci -E-ricXsti. al . . - •. . • . ,. • . . • - Plannz,'1 :.blit 4aHo 'tai••''2-...:...'" ' • • .•• . ,.. • ., •-.• ••• '-, • i.r' .. • . '1 . . CIVcr: 2gR,e.rt" )P . . .„ , . • . ' -' •' •' ••! :: •;,114at041.1 ",4#11.4.***1.-'1., '• ' ",:- ' . - ' . 0C! •.$1,11 -Arut..4,e,:. sOzt,h. . • , • RelAgn* ilii0tx*A4V)P. 98055 . • . . , . . . . .. . • . . : : -... . : . , ,.. . , . ... -..-. ! -. • . ' . .. ., — ' Ae.:, Shoreline Manatiement Permit - rees . , ..,. , . .„. . ..:;'„... . ...„,.. ,.....,..... , . . 4- , • •, .. . „ ,.:..., ... . . . • , DO4r : rj1111P')F113.611;':: -- - ' ' • . .. , . -„.....-:-•-. - '• • - • ' . , . : • - : s; I; inforAe4: -00 the telephone, our Client is Cpneerned . . „ .. .„ : .-.• you ... ..: - - • . L ' vith -the...neyptoeeed.-feed..for Shoreline Management. ,eiPit4.,'-:: :',:::::%,-/,' , . , . ' '' .•• It 10••••04t. ine4Orittalading-.th41; ' 1'1. . Pr0p05o4 calls.- for .a:.,fee,. of percentone-,tenth-,OfPne . ofthe value of the develCOMent . . . . . . . _ .. . . . .. - . i - • , • over .T4110)..QOP.41•..;;;10.444 is ;to; ke Act4ed to the flat- fee of '.015,P;.: ,:r.,,,,.''',-.-..- .;:,•,,,, . .. is nP 'Ir.000,0104 •oiling: on the fees. 'Without limitati0n4 , :,..,2 the actual:- .6b0:- 0har4edfor. a .particUlar .project may 'far ,, . . . ! ' exceed the cOstivAnvOlved by the City in. processing a .:..,',::. ...., , , • Ulat.:permit.,--:iiii. cantmairAble that in 'i project -suali*.as-,:',:' , ',:. 1.-,":";:,; . _ • ... . .. . : that 'bf:;:our: .:Cilant.,-,POrt Quendall, the fee. for a Shoroline,...„" :-, ,...-..,-,,- : . . .. .-' 11.403494*00tTorMit,;:could- exteed one-half-million dollars. ',':' ,',.;!-- ,6 . - - ItioWever .-wedOutitvthat-the' actual coat incurred:by. therCitY-. 4 - ; _ . • - in:prOceatiingUC ...in:.APPlication would .oven come close:to . . that'figure..:::*Wed0 not belieye. the City intends to'lai'501:44L; Al'i! .',..': ::.'.; • :. prOfit:frop'en aplication; howeVer, thia_coul* .r04fult,„10t4A.:,.. .„.,,,, out a lioitation: or -loaxisiu which the City cold Chatge' :'"''::;;',4:-',:,:.:.')g•'. ;:.!::',':'':'-,: ,,;, . „ . .... _ •• "... . ., „. , . ., ; . . .. .., ••• .. .. .,..;-,,,,.. „,,,,;„‘.p,..."......' . . .. . • Our client is more than willing to work. with you and:the . , cityCouncil -; as= vell- aw-the• mayor, in. attenpting-...to ,arrivew,,,,,i,:,-,,,,,..04,, ,-_ . . : -;.: ,, :,,,,,,;.;, •,,,,..,,,;,,;: •••,,•-:: at an:,equitablac:mio*hod of handling,.fees.-of this nature: ,. ,.,... .:•;.-:.:,;:.:,.,,,,i!,,,,,...„;:if,....„,..-,14; . ... ,•,.,.., ,51,4,0;,,..Api:,;....-..,..• • 1-. ;;. to*iitVer;•,.thefOeSahould,10 more related* to tho !actual ,A.:::,.:', ,:,• ,,.,, ,-e . . . . ; • , I; , ;,. ' - . -. . ';• -; - coatincUrre4ratiiitithanbaied Upon at: Unliatited:Vereent fiure . 4;:Wq° . .. W:';I:;'' '.?? ,;. . . ' . • . .. , ,. ., .........• . ' ' , ' : . , _ • - , ' • ..•'. ••,:.,' ,,.F,.,.',.'..‘., ,-•••••)•,,I .,,•.,',',,[`gt:qV,.!,,' (•, .. . . . . ' ' : . - • We. woUld'-aPpreciate the -bpportunity; to. meet and 4iacuaw:..-..-..,.:::*-,.1.70,4,'•,?...; . . _ . . . _ this ..ry41 ,.c. .4401,!'ypt,t. and the other.-appropriate.• par...tiaa .,;•,; - 5,-/;•• ,;e..v,.:;.,,:e.,,,,,,-i-, . . .. . 1 fro the (!ity., :', .**.:; 70roul.4-'1100 Appreciate; being inforated-f' -'''..................................... ........ ., ... ..'. -,-,,,,,-„A ..w„. 1 . .-if. ther..CitY..4o0pOil determines-tO go all.ead: with_ thopropolOXIN,J,,w „ :. . - ;: ;•. • -, , •••:,,,;,,,...4:-,,,i),,,,,,...,;....0.,,,,,-;:. - : • . - -- : '':• .-. .-•.';' -: ;'• :-I-- ''':=:•::•'1''': ":•: ';;••• ;• ' ' .. .e -;.. - :-',••••••• --•-)•;1,-s;;•:,:-.. . •., •:;. i.:---•.; -;- •••!•;, ,f•:„•,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,-„._„, • - .-• : — „7--, ' r-,',;'.21,.H. ,,,!f,,IM4,, J,.14640AL . , '.-., , ' • . - ...,.. ,.., . .. : '....% ,':...:';•,,:,,. ,.:, :,,,,:',..',: -../-[,-...: ../t ..: - • — .,i-• :••(.../'', :".O.'..-.1/.. .,-(,• •"4'-; ,,.:.:•..- • . ,•1.•,,'‘':.:, t-',4.0...,,n'-;-...-Yi,lit., . ...., .. .... ., ... ..• ;.,.•,; -. , . .. : .. ...,.: ,,, • :, ,,.. . .1 ' ••.. • ; , . . •-•'.;: .... ;:..f.'. .' /..,.. ?;,..');4,,?•'....!-:J.(.,,, : .../(....„.k. ..‹...,,, . . •.. „--.,-.,• .. . : ..•:., ..,,,,.. .. .,-,1::., ' A,.„•,.,,,,..,,:,,:..t.,..zomt..4,n,AAJN,Wq !' • •. '.:,.., .'. '' ';-' : '''--','• :', ';,,,V '.,,,:•-:'• •• • ,,-, , . --:.- .... -.: .-,w..:- . . .... ..-::. ,,!,-,;:f,::•.::: J,,•-:-. V0 :. -,; ,. . • 1 ; , ,„ .. . , ,; ;• .;;;;.; • ; :•....,,..,;-',::,,,,,..,,-.!:..:',;;;;;!-.17:;;;•;;..;•:,•;;C:,.:.; ."'; • ' •, :''• ,'-.; " :. ',' ' •,:•.; ,;-' -,,•,: • '- , 1 .,:114.?,,if;.•:;6,•Y,,:j,o,'(-„-•, r4ti.RM`,A ' ,.', .. ..;•',',;;:t-'!.•.I.,:,,:,,,',1i:'- '-`',i:P11.•°1%,::{,1',''',. ,. . • . y .:,,,, . . .., ,.., ,.,... , , .. ,. . • • , p ..:.„,:,..if,.. .: w,,4;.*i0,00,1,,,,-,. 3,,i -; .:.,: .‘, -,-,' 1 - • • . . .. . . , :., ..., ,,..-..,:,., , .• ,. .. ,:.'.....y„,::.,.y;:;,,,,,,',.,I,!,„1,,..,13,i,,,,,,i0,,,,, , 1 ,..r, !...,-:....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..4„ ,.....,,,.(:,,,n..pt, .. . -:.::. -,-..,. .'...,:,;•,,..:..-. ...,-.... ' ": -C.. :'..i,;, 1.,..,../...q01,rf,tiN,WOOli 1 ' ., - .i. . -... ••,, .• • ••••••.., . • - • • . . . - • - ',.• f,-;••:- • . •.. - ';[•',,•;.,:,',.•.,:::', .••.::,';c:•:,i::-, .,i;NIAA. . ,,,. ii, , . : ..,.,.. , .,.:.•-....:;,• -,•,., .• ....,,:•3-..!f, •,,,•,..,:•:.•, ;:::'.,,,• ;,',:,',1!•!ft,,i,,,A•ei,•-igPc ,'•,:..;:,:''!,;•.:..-..:;:.•';:.''.'.•:-,.: 1 . .- • - .. • •.,. •::y .,... ' ,..:. ,•:.:,,".--:' .---::. •- -• -- •• - - • ,•,-..,-...-•,:-:' ' '-:: .•:,:,..-..1,;(::;p:,ipv,'• icr,4!;;ia ,I,:o:c, .4, .1., :'.: ;:.,],'';•'' ,...:' • ,,..',,. ,. :,,.':,';.....• :., ' ..- .,..:-:' .. ...1,,,:-,-,.:, 1.',t,,,-,':::,:.':,:-,`:,•,,:•••',. ,:,•• ' ,'..,.!'- ... - ,, ':, . .,•..-..•.'':•„';•-..±:'.''•: L -' , !,.',•,';':., *:..,-, Itii!!.. :4!,40:.11%-'l4;IA ..,..,•,,•. .-. -, " . •• . . -• .. - - -- . --. — . . . —,, ,,,.i.1-!,1:,J'-',2.y.',--10.1tX!..;', Ve*,::., P, . . • ' • . '::;''. '''''':?' ' '''''':. ''''''''':''''' ''''''''''''1:::.:'''' *', ..0-06i'•, !,FiVki?i,i. ' '• ' -' '''' ' ':.:-•".,''.(. '.ci,•;'," ,,;;,n':',P,ik0j. .,.. c„!. .,.*:• ' , *--,/ . _ , • -pii. \';70 Neff. /1444", ----', . ,..'LL-.. ..... .......-. ,rAi i , (.; j'I,_ • . .._..- . - t HILL18,.PHILLIPS, CAIRNCROSS, CLARK & MARTIN SUSAN R,.ACilD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION . •: PETER LI BUCK H RAYMOND CAIRNCROSS , 403 COLUMBIA STREET % . ' 623-174b i AREA CODE 206 MARK S.CLARK • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 JEROME L.HILLIS ' GEORGE W.MARTIN,JR. LOUIS 0 PETERSON JOHN E. 'HI/LIPS .. 1 .'iecet.lh6:-r '1 , l', ;)STE H,VAN D PiLLIPS I ' RICILIARD R.WILSON . . , . • C . 1: . . , . -i ,. Goron --: -jon ' ;:: t=gtc-vr . : .. i : . (: N-4:ulicipal 1711.1disI9 • . 30 Mill • vue. South . WaahinAlton 9S0S5 . , , Shorelin, Manalement Permit - Pees , '; r tsf:.r . .1.-ickson: II , 2.,.. T irformed you on the telephone, our client is concerned ., .' ' 1.7ith ti:vi.:1 nt.,!:v proposed f.dm9 for Shoreline 'Y::anagement Permits. , i is our u.rldersten4nq that the proposal cells for a fee. of (me-tenth of. one percent of the value of the development csvpr 3,;1CO3 (100, .which is to be added to the flat fee of f;150. Mere is no proposed Coiling on the fees. Without limitation, thei- actual fee charged for a particular project may .tar , 11 th4,1.! costs involved by the City in processing a partic- ular permit. It is conceivable that in a' projt ec such as , that of our client; Port Ouendall, the fee for a Shoreline ?Aanagomont Pizrmit could exceed one-half million dollars.1 IC.owever le, * ouht(4 that the actual cost incurred by- the City An processing such o4 appliCation would even come close to - . t4lat figura. We do not b6liove the city intends to make a; 1.,rofit from an application; hovp;vver, tIdo. could result with.- limitation or maximum which the City could charge. 1 , , Oliur client is more than wi-lit to work with you and the 1 11. 011,ity Council, as yell es the Mayor, it attemptinq to arrive at zin equitable method of handlina feesof this nature. HOwever, the fees should be more related to the actual i „, COB.fl incurred rather than based upon an unlipaited percent figUre. , , WF1.1 Would appreciate the opportunity to meet and .1iscuss 1-3:k,i.a mtter. with 'you and the other appropriate parties qom_ thc, City. W wouLl also ai?proiate being informed ' • th-e. City Coudoter ncil ins to go ahead with the proposiq . , ,,r -,\ , . , . . , . ..• ,. . , , • 1 . •.• ,. . . •• . , I . . . . ,. ,- . •' , , •,_ — . ,1-xordon Erickson Decertair 6 1 97 t iiage Two wiithout a reasonable limitation so that we may have an Opportunity to present our client' s position to the Council. .eel!,, you. Ve-ry t • - yours , ohn E. Philli . s "Pita cc: Charles J. Delaurenti , Mayor William Grant, Renton City Council Gq.srard Shellar , Renton City Attorney Port Quendall RentonI1 City Council 12/206 Page 5 Sign Design Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason _recommended amendment to the Review Board Sign Code. Ordinance to repeal the provisions for. the .Sign Design Review . 'Bard as no business has come before the board since formation by the Council in 1975. The letter noted the Sign Design .Committee made up of . City staff is working very well and felt no need to maintain citizen board. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, . 000NCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. The Clerk was asked to furnish a copy of this material to. Councilman Grant. ' MOTION CARRIED. Offer :to 'urchase Letter from Rudy J. Starkovich,' 12014 - 87th Ave. S. , Seattle, informed City P'rop•rty . the city of his wish to purchase the house and lot at 1511 Lake Ave S., Donated b, . on Talbot Hill . The letter noted' awarenes.s of existing easements over Olympic P'pe1ine the property and the City's possible need for an additional 15 ft. ease- ment on the' north side of the lot; also of the extensive improvements ' needed on thehouse to bring it up to the City's Building Code. MOVED. BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE AND TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND REPORT BACK., CARRIED. Shoreline Permits((etter from Hillis", Phillips , Cairncross, Clark Martin, P.S. , by 'John Port Q;uenaall / E. Phillips, ,reported concern of client, Port Quendall , with, the new / proposed fees for Shoreli'ne -Management Permits, noting their understanding / that .the proposal calls fora fee of 1/10. of 1% of the value of the deve'1- opment over. $100;000 which is to . be added to the flat fee of $150, with no ceiling on fees. The' letter anticipated fees could exceed 1/2 million dollars and asked to work with City to reach equitable method of handling the fees MOV( D R BYO STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY; REFER TO FINANCE AND PERSONNEL I . . AUDIEN1E COMMENT Administrative Assistant Custer explained progress of proposed Senior Citizen. Center, planned for south bank 'of Cedar River between Logan &.Wells Ave. S. , explained funding and' requested authorization forl Mayor and City Clerk. to proceed with application for Referendum 29 Funds , not setting amount, 'and go on record as intending. to furnish operating funds . for the 'proposed center. MOVED BY -CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL . GOON RECORD SUPPORTING SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND DIRECT THE -MAYOR AND STAFF TO PROCEED WITH APPLICATION FOR FUNDING; CONFIRMING INTENT TO - MAINTAIN FACILITY. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE,1COUNCIL AMEN MOTION TO REFER MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLA- TION TO SECURE ADDITIONAL FUNDING:THROUGH REFERENDUM 29. AMENDMENT CARRIED.. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. Size of facility was discussed with maximum of 20,000 sq.ft. which may be reduced to 16,000 sq. ft. OLD BUSIN SS Publir Safety Committee Chairwoman Shi'npoch presented commi tee report Police Department from '12/20 meeting, stating the Police Department is authorized to buy ' Cars &: Va seven vehicles at an estimated, cost of $5,200 each (plus $500 per vehicle for trade-in value). The report recommended authorization to purchase six cars and one van_ estimated cost of the van. t5.458..49. sufficient ' Of Ft THE CITY OF RENTON `A ® ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 pCHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING I)EPARTNIENT 0 �Q- 235-2550 MEMORANDUM ��, �, . . Q � April 28 ,. 1976 TO: C . J . Del.aurenti , Mayor City Council Members FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen ; Planning Director RE: SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Attached for your information is a copyof the final Shoreline Master Program, GRK: wr Attachment cc : . Administrative Assistant Airport Director Building Division ,/City Clerk . Engineering Division . Fire Department Library ( 2) . Park Department Police Department Public Works Department i . is 1(� . .11 ti 'C 1, Lf •L: / = •_:L��: L.ii s : 5 U`' !,/ January 23, 1976 • i � .• The Honorable Charles Delaurenti a°� Mayor, City of Renton Municipal Building ! 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 93055 ear Mayor Delaurenti : This letter constitutes formal approval of the City of Renton's shoreline Master program, as resubmitted on October 23, 1975. We recognize and appreciate the effort expended by the planning staff and the Citizen Advisory Committee who participated in the preparation and completion of Renton's master program. The revised program has been improved considerably over the original version, and while we still have some concerns with certain aspects of the program, we feel that the revised program generally meets ' the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 . • • The present program has addressed and resolved most of the concerns we had regarding your initial program, however, there still exist three critical areas which you elected not to address : 1 . The authorization for the Planning Commission to vary the Application of Regulations, and Use of Variances and Conditional Uses; 2. Acceptance or Adoption of the Lake Washington Regional Goals and Policies; and 3. The "strict economic necessity" clause found in the Commercial Development Regulations 7.05.01 (p. 50). • A more detailed description of these concerns is described in the staff comments section of this letter. It is felt that the recommendations will help clarify certain aspects of the program and ' will make it a more effective and more easily administered document. • the Honorable Charles Delaurenti Page 2 January 23, 1976 Thank you again for your cooperation in the preparation and de- velopment of this program and we look forward to working with you in the future. Further inquiries on this matter should be directed to Don Peterson (206) 753-6365. Sincerely, • / John A. Biggs Director AB:vh Enclosure cc to: King County Commission Director Gordon Erickson, Renton Planning Dept. Ed Sands, Director, King County Division of Building and Land Development John Lynch, Director, King County Department of Budget and Program Planning Bob Aggas, DOE NW Regional Office DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM FOR CITY OF RENTON The approval of this program should not be construed as an acceptance or endorsement of the issues mentioned above. With this in mind, we condition bur approval with the following understanding and recommendations: 1 . Several sections of the program authorize the Planning Commission to allow deviation from adherence to the regulations. We would recommend that these concerns be accommodated through a variance or conditional use procedure as established in the Act (RCW 90. 5cl. 100(5)) and the Guidelines (WAC 173-16-070) . As the program is now written, the Planning Commission would be placed in the position of having to determine whether or not to apply shoreline regulations. This procedure tends to weaken the' program and does not clarify the decision-making process for the permit applicant, the developer, or the city administering the program. Section 5 of your program, Environments (p. 35) , stipulates "Permitted Uses" and Uses Permitted by Planning Commission, " since the Planning Commission is the designated administrator of all substantial development permits , there is a need to clarify the distinction between those uses permitted outright and those permitted by the Planning Commission. We recommend that those titled "Uses Permitted by Planning Commission" be designated conditional uses and that the conditions under which these uses are allowed be stipulated in the first update of this program. 2. As previously stated in the original denial letter, your program does not specifically adopt or endorse the Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies. As stipu- lated in the regulation which created the Lake Washington Region (Chapter 173-28 WAC) , the goals and policies contained in the final document ". . .shall be incorporated into the master programs of the local governmental units comprising the region. " It is a responsibility of the Department, when re- viewing the local master program for adequacy, to insure that the subject policies are reflected in those programs. In limited instances, unique local situations might dictate some minor deviation from the regional policies. Such deviation will be approved by the Department upon the receipt of substantiating documentation of need. Without this documentation the regional goals and policies shall prevail and all Shoreline Substantial Development permits pertaining to Lake Washington shall be .uniformly reviewed according to their compliance with these established goals and policies. • • • 3. Commercial Development 7.05.01 (p. 50) Proof of "strict economic necessity" by the applicant is not a basis for allowing commercial development which is inconsistent with the water-related or water-dependent clauses in several regulations in your program. Our recommendation is that this clause be deleted in the first update of your program. I I i I I I I +i� I _, , ., . Renton City Council 2/2/76 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE - Continued Shoreline Master Letter from the State Department of Ecology constituted formal approval Program of the city's Shoreline master program as submitted 10/23/75, noting the improvement over original version and that the revised program ( generally meets the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 ; however, lists three critical areas claiming the city failed to address : 1 . The authorization for the Planning Commission to vary ( the application of Regulations, and use of variances and conditional fuses; 2. Acceptance or adoption of the Lake Washington Regional Goals land Policies; 3. The "strict economic necessity" clause found in the ( Commercial Development Regulations 7.05.01 (p.50) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. Discussion ensued whether or not acceptance required limmediate attention to the listed critical areas, or if this was a smatter for future consideration, and if clarification should be sought. It was also noted the Planning Department and the Citizens ZAdvisory Committee had disapproved of the taking of control from the Llocal citizens and purposefully omitted the listed items; concluding the ! letter did consitute approval . MOTION CARRIED. Kay Downs Letter from Kay Downs thanked the Mayor, Council Members and City PurchasingllDivion Employees for making her retirement party on 1/25/76 so rewarding, 29 Years w/(City giving thanks for cooperation, kindness and friendliness over the years. I Acquisition of Councilman Grant submitted five letters he had received in reply to a tlands in his inquiries for acquisition of additional land in the Green River Crillia Flats , Valley including possibilities of financing; as follow: Mr. Charles ;;reen River Perkins , 11423 S.E. 182nd St. , suggested Batelle of Seattle, Univer- Valley 1 sity of Washington, National Wildlife Federation of Washington D.C. ; Mr. Martin Baker, Executive Director of the Washington Environmental Council , Seattle, suggested Seattle Audubon Society and the Nature Conservancy in the Northwest; Mr. Mart Kask, Executive Director of the Puget Sound Council of Governments assigned staff members to research funding; Mr. Leonard Steiner, objected to filling of marshland for speculative purposes and suggested saving of trees over 35' ; and Mr. Kevin Bannon suggested funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation and the State Parks Department. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL REFER LETTERS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Councilman Grant also mentioned letter forthcoming from League of Women Voters same subject. Council Presi - dent Stredicke noted the Council ' s secretary is notifying the letter ! writers of the Committee of the Whole meeting 2/10/76 when the com- mittee will be discussing acquisition, acreage and revenue sources re wetlands; and noted recommendation forthcoming re capital improve- ment priorities. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Grant asked committee to check funding sources suggested meeting with same. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mr. Erwin Fey, owner of the Renton and Roxy Theaters, and Mr, . Ralph Theater Admission Osgood, Manager of the Cinema I and II Theaters, registered a complaint Tax Opposed against Ordinance 2996 which established an admission tax on movies I and, explained hardships of the industry, noting changes over the 52 1 years Mr. Fey has been in the theater business in Renton. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CARRIED. i ' I APPOINTMENTSLI Letter from Mayor Delaurenti announced reappointment of Councilman f LP8F Board Kenneth D. Bruce and appointment of Councilman Robert E. McBeth - Kenneth Bruce (replacing Councilman Earl Clymer) to the Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters Retirement System Disability Board effective 3/1/76 Robert McBeth and expiring' 3/1/78. The letter noted no Council action required, for information purposes only. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, 1 COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAYOR RE THE LEOFFIBOARD. CARRIED. Department Heads Letter from Mayor Delaurenti announced permanent appointment, asking Council concurrence, of the following department heads effective immediately: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney; Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director; Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director; Gwen Marshall , Finance Director. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REQUEST OF THE MAYOR AND CONCUR. IN APPOINTMENTS OF DEPARTMENT HEADS. CARRIED. - :.; - • \� Q`v , �( �� - d' �`` tfl It‘ m • 4" . pp..,�q �_ OV y) Cl, �, �p9 State of CV . .. ��5- Washington December 4, 1975 N c 'ors ��.4", .r j Department • Lc, <<,,;f `;r; ,°i of Ecology C-. Orr/ -f/ \ `r 4'..71,9I . ►G iJ . Y dy dB9 , • Dear Sir: • We are enclosing a copy of chapter 173-14 WAC "Permits for Substantial Developments on Shorelines of the State". This WAC was previously amended and these amendments went into effect on November 14, 1975. Due to the subsequent deletion of the last sentence of WAC 173-14-040, copies were not distributed to the appropriate. agencies. This' subsequent amendment. required a separate adoption 'hearing.. This subsequent. ' amendment will' be effective on January 2, 1976. ' (See attachments "A" and "B") . Please note several changes have been made in the sample proposed forms • to include requested additional data.' These changes., along. with any additions that local government may want to include, can be accomplished . in preparing new forms. ' If you have any question, please feel free to call or write me or Harry W. Hokanson at 753-6886. . , Sincerely, . • • . I /t,'Ll, 4-Zse7 Y2/a.c/6._ . D. Rodney Mack Division Supervisor Shorelands Division Office of Land Programs DRM:lr . • I enclosure • . : I I eielfitittil Daniel J Evans,Governor John A. Biggs,Director Olympia,Washington 98504 Telephone (206) 753-2800' s s I j • j it i f The last sentence of WAC 173-14-040 is being deleted. since this concept is contained in RCW 90.58.140(1) which is part j o;f the controlling statute (the Shorelines Management Act) and therefore is superfluous. • • • • • j • i • ATTACHMENT A AMD WAC 173-14-040 EXEMPTIONS FROM PERMIT SYSTEM. The following shall not require permits for the purposes of the act: (1) Any development of which the total cost of fair market value does not exceed $1000, if such development does not Materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. (2) Normal maintenance or the repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. (3) Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. (4) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. (5) Construction of a barn or similar agricultural struc- ture on wetlands. Construction and practices normal or neces- sary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities includ- ing agricultural service roads and utilities on wetlands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels: PROVIDED, that a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alternative of the contour of the wetlands by level- ing or filling other than that which results from normal culti- vation; shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or 'ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock, hay grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/ or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations. (6) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys. (7) Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to this chapter. (8) Construction of a dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owners, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence, the cost for fair market value, whichever is lower, does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars. . (9) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reserviors, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored 1ground water from the irrigation of lands. ATTACHMENT B ' I (10) The marking of property lines or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly inter- fere with normal public use of the surface of the water. (11) Operation and maintenance of any system or dikes, �. . ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on the effec- tivedate of this 1975 amendatory act which were created,. devloped or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural dranage or diking system. (12) Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to chapter 80.59 RCW. II (13) No permit shall be required under chapter 90.58 RCW41for the construction of up to 500 feet of one and only one road or segment of a road, provided such road does not enter the shoreline more than once. Such exemption from said permit requirements shall be limited to a single road or road segment for ,ieach forest practice and such road construction shall be • subject to the requirements of chapter 76.09 RCW and regula- tior`s adopted pursuant thereto and to the prohibitions or restrictions of any master program in effect under the provi- sions of 90.58 RCW. Nothing in this subsection shall add to or diminish the authority of the shoreline management act regarding roa4lconstruction except as specifically provided herein. The provisions of this subsection shall not relate to any road which crosses over or through a stream, lake, or other water body subject to chapter 90.58 RCW. f if I II ICI l i ' � I II I r i _ I AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 173-14 WAC PERMITS FOR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON SHORELINES OF THE STATE Effective January 2, 1976 I j . AMD WAC 173-14-010 AUTHORITY. This regulation is adopted pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (3) and RCW 90.58.200. AMD WAC 173-14-020 PURPOSE. RCW 90.58.140(3) requires local governments to establish a program, consistent with rules adopted by the department of ecology, for the administration and enforcement of the permit system established therein. The purpose of this regulation is to establish basic rules for the • permit system in harmony with the spirit of RCW 90.58.140(3) II, which provides that local government shall establish a program consistent with rules adopted by the department for administra- tion and enforcement of the permit system for shoreline man- agement. This administrative regulation is drafted to also reflect RCW 90.58.050 which provides that the intent of the shoreline management act is to establish a cooperative program 1 between local government and the state. According to this provision, local government shall have the primary responsi- bility for initiating and administering the regulatory program i of shoreline management whereas the department shall act pri- marily in a supportive and review capacity with primary emphasis on insuring compliance with the policies and provi- sions of the shoreline management act. AMD WAC 173-14-030 DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply: , (1) "Department" means the department of ecology. (2) "Local government" means any county, incorporated city or town which contains within its boundaries any lands I or waters subject to this chapter. (3) "Final order" shall include the approval or dis- approval of a permit or a letter of exemption as set forth in WAC 173-14-115. ' (4) "Act" shall mean chapter 286, Laws of 1971, Ex. Sess. , the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. (5) "Substantial development undertaken on the shore- lines of the state prior to the effective date of the Act" shall mean actual construction begun upon the shoreline as. opposed to preliminary engineering or planning. The definitions and concepts set forth in RCW 90.58.030 shall also apply as used herein. AMD WAC 173-14-040 EXEMPTIONS FROM PERMIT SYSTEM. The fol- lowing shall not require permits for the purposes of the act: (1) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed $1000, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. (2) Normal maintenance or the repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. (3) Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. li (4) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. 2. u • (5) Construction of a barn or similar agricultural struc- ture on wetlands. Construction and practices normal or neces- sary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities includ- ing agricultural service roads and utilities on wetlands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels: PROVIDED, that a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the wetlands by level- • ing or filling other than that which results from normal culti- vation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facil- ity used or capable of being used for feeding livestock, hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/ or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations. (6) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys. (7) Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than require- ments imposed pursuant to this chapter. (8) Construction of a dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owners, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence, the cost or fair. market value, whichever is lower, does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars. (9) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water from the irrigation of lands. (10) The marking of property lines or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly inter- fere with normal public use of the surface of the water. (11) Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on the effec- tive date of this 1975 amendatory act which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system. (12) Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW. (13) No permit shall be required under chapter 90.58 RCW for the construction of up to 500 feet of one and only one road or segment of a road, provided such road does not enter the shoreline more than once. Such exemption from said permit requirements shall be limited to a single road or road segment for each forest practice and such road construction shall be subject to the requirements of chapter 76.09 RCW and regula- tions adopted pursuant thereto and to the prohibitions or restrictions of any master program in effect under the provi- sions of 90.58 RCW. Nothing in this subsection shall add to or diminish the authority of the shoreline management act regard- ing road construction except as specifically provided herein. The provisions of this subsection shall not relate to any road which crosses over or through a stream, lake, or other water body subject to chapter 90.58 RCW. 3. n' X • AiMD WAC 173-14-060 SCOPE OF PERMIT. The following time requirements shall apply to all substantial development permits and conditional uses and variances: I, (1) Construction or substantial progress toward con- struction of a project for which a permit has been granted pursuant to the act must be undertaken within two years after the approval of the substantial development permit. Substan- tial progress towards construction shall include, but not be • limited to the letting of bids, making of contracts, purchase of materials involved in development, but shall not include development or uses which are inconsistent with the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-100. Provided, that in determining the running of the two-year period hereof, there shall not be included the time during which a development was not actually pursued byconstruction and the pendency of litigation reason- ' ably related thereto made it reasonable not to so pursue; pro- vided further, that local government may, at its discretion extend the two-year time period for a reasonable time based on factors, including the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits which are required prior to the commencement of construction. 1" (2) If a project for which a permit has been granted pursuant to the act has not been completed within five years after the approval of the permit by local government, the local government that granted the permit shall, at the expiration of the five-year period, review the permit, and upon a showing of good cause, do either of the following: (a) Extend the permit for one year; or (b) Terminate the permit; provided that nothing herein shall preclude local government from issuing substantial development permits with a fixed termination date of less than five (5) years. NEWWAC 173-14-062 APPLICABILITY OF PERMIT SYSTEM TO FEDERAL AGENCIES. The substantial development permit system shall be applied in the following manner to federal agencies on lands meeting the criteria of the shoreline management act and the department for shorelines of the state. (1) Federal agencies shall not be required to obtain permits for substantial developments undertaken by the fed- eral government on lands owned in fee by the federal govern- • ment, unless the federal government grants or reserves to the state or local government, substantial jurisdiction over • activities on those lands. (2) Upon approval of the Washington state shoreline program pursuant to the coastal zone management act, 16 USC 1451 et seq. , the federal government shall be subject to the state shoreline program as provided by the coastal zone management act. (3) The substantial development permit system shall apply to nonfederal activities constituting substantial developments undertaken on lands subject to nonfederal owner- ship, lease or easement, even though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of a federal ownership. (4) The substantial development permit system shall apply to substantial developments undertaken on lands not federally owned but under lease, easement, license, or other similar federal property rights short of fee ownership, to the federal government. I�I 4. �,II NEW WAC 173-14-064 REVISIONS TO SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS. When an applicant seeks to revise a substantial development permit, local government shall request from the applicant detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit. (1) If local government determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original per- mit, local government shall approve a revision. The revised permit shall become effective immediately. The approved revision along with copies of the revised site plan and text, should be submitted by certified mail to the appropriate department of ecology regional office, the attorney general, and to persons who have previously notified local government relative to the original application pursuant to WAC 173-14- 070. Appeals shall be in accordance with RCW 90.58.180 and shall be filed within .15 days from date of certified mailing. The party seeking review shall have the burden of proving the revision granted was not within the scope and intent of the original permit. (2) If the proposed changes are not within the scope and intent of the original permit, the applicant shall apply ' for a new substantial development permit in the manner pro- vided for herein. AMD WAC 173-14-070 NOTICE REQUIRED. Upon receipt of a proper application for a shoreline management substantial development permit, local government shall insure that notices thereof are published at least once a week on the • same day of the week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within the area in which the develop- ment is proposed. In addition, local government shall insure that additional notice of such application is given by at least one of the following methods: (1) Mailing to the latest recorded real property owners as shown by the county assessor within at least three hundred (300) feet of the boundary of the property upon which the sub- stantial development is proposed, (2) Posting in a conspicuous manner on the property upon which the project is to be constructed or, (3) Any other manner deemed appropriate by local author- ities .to accomplish the objectives of reasonable notice to adjacent landowners and the public. Such additional notice shall be given or mailed at least thirty (30) days before the date of final local action. An affidavit of publication that the notice has been properly published, and/or as applicable, • posted or deposited in the U. S. mail pursuant to this section shall be affixed to the application. Within thirty days (30) of the final publication, posting or mailing of the notice, whichever comes last, any interested person may submit his written views upon the application to the appropriate local government or notify the local government of his desire to receive a copy of the action taken upon the application. All persons who so submit their views, and all others who so notify the appropriate local government, shall be notified in a timely manner of the action taken upon the application. All notices ' of applications for shoreline management substantial develop- ment. permits shall contain, as a minimum, the information called for. in the following form: See next page for sample of proposed form. RE: WAC 173-14-070 5. u NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT III SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 11 Notice is hereby given that (state full name) who is (describe relationship to property, such as owner, purchaser, lessee, etc.) . of the below-described property has filed an application �!I for a substantial development permit for the development of (describe development including uses) located at (give street address, if known, otherwise • give distance and direction to nearest town) within (quarter section) of section of township N. , Range W.W.M. , in (city or town) Washington. Said development is proposed (County) to be within and/or its associated wet- (name of water area) - lands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify (name of local government official) in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last notice given pursuant to WAC 173-14-020. The final date of publication, posting, or,mailing of notice is (date) Written comments must be received by (date) III I,I 6. I' AMD WAC 173-14-080 PUBLIC HEARINGS. Local governments may establish a mandatory or optional public hearing procedure to precede the issuance or denial of permits in order to allow interested persons to present their views. AMD WAC 173-14-090 FILING WITH DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND ATTORNEY GENERAL. Copies of the original application and other pertinent materials used in the final decision pursuant to either chapter 90.58 RCW or chapter 43.21C RCW, the permit and any other written evidence of the final order of local government relative to the application shall be filed with the department of ecology and attorney general within eight days of the final decision. Filing shall not be complete until the final order has actually been received by the regional office of the department within which the project lies, and by the attorney general. AMD WAC 173-14-100 JUDGMENT CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOP- 1 MENT PERMITS.* (1) Prior to the effective date of an applicable master program, a substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development proposed is consistent with: (a) The policies and procedures of the act; (b) The guidelines and regulations of the department; (c) So far as can be ascertained, the master program being developed for the area; and (2) After the adoption or approval, as appropriate, by the department of an applicable master program, a substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development proposed is consistent with WAC 173-14-100 (1) (with the excep- tion of guidelines referred to in WAC 173-14-100(1) (b) above) and the master program adopted or approved for the area. . AMD WAC 173-14-110 APPLICATION FOR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE, AND/OR VARIANCE. Applications for a substantial development permit, which may include conditional use, and/or variance shall contain, as a minimum, the infor- mation called for in the following form. Such forms shall be supplied by local government. See next page for sample of proposed form. RE: WAC 173-14-110 * The State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21(C) RCW, has been determined to be applicable to government permit programs. See Chapter 461-08-175 WAC, Rules of Practice and Procedures of. the Shoreline Hearings Board. Also see Council on Environmental Policy Guidelines. 7. . J ill APPLICATION FOR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is authorized by the shoreline manage- ment act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with appro- priate local, state, or federal officials to determine whether ' your project falls within any other permit systems. ' .1. Name of applicant 2. Mailing address 3. Relation of applicant to property: Owner Purchaser Lessee III Other 0 4. . Name and address of owner, if other than applicant 5. General location of proposed project (section, to the ' nearest quarter section, township, and range) 6. Name of water area and/or wetlands within which devel- F' opment is proposed it 7. Current use of the property with existing improve- ments 8. Proposed use of property 1 9. (To be completed by local official.) Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : • III 8. I1 ' ` y 10. (To be completed by local official.) In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the existing grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. PROJECT DIAGRAMS: Draw all site plans and maps to scale, clearly indicating scale on lower right-hand corner and attach them to the application. (a) SITE PLAN. Include on plan: (1) Site boundary. (2) Property dimensions in vicinity of project. (3) Ordinary high-water mark. (4) Typical cross section or sections showing: (i) Existing ground elevations. (ii) Proposed ground elevation. (iii) Height of existing structures. (iv) Height of proposed structures. (5) Where appropriate, proposed land contours using five-foot intervals in water area and ten-foot intervals on areas landward of ordinary high-water mark, if development involves grading, cutting, filling, or other alteration of land contours. (6) Show dimensions and locations of existing struc- tures which will be maintained. (7) Show dimensions and locations of proposed structures. (8) Identify source, composition, and volume of fill material. (9) Identify composition and volume of any extracted materials, and identify proposed disposal area. (10) Location of proposed utilities, such as sewer, septic tanks and drainfields, water, gas, electricity. (11) If the development proposes septic tanks, does proposed development comply with local health and state reg- ulations? (12) Shoreline designation according to master program. (13) Show which areas are shorelines and which are shorelines of statewide significance. (b) VICINITY MAP. (1) Indicate site location using natural points of references (roads, state highways, promi- nent land marks, etc. (2) If the development involves the removal of any soils by dredging or otherwise, please identify the proposed disposal site on the map. If the disposal site is beyond the confines of the vicinity map, provide another vicinity map showing the precise location of the site and its dis- tance to the nearest city or town. (3) Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within one thousand feet in all directions from development site. (i.e. , res- idential to the north, commercial to the south, etc. ) . 9 Ili i • J NEW WAC 173-14-115 LETTER OF EXEMPTION. Whenever a develop- ment falls within the exemptions stated in WAC 173-14-040 and the development is subject to a U.S. Corps of Engineers sec- 1 tion 10 permit under the River and Harbor Act of 1899 the local government shall prepare a letter addressed to the applicant and the department, exempting the development from the permit requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW. This exemption shall be in substantially the following form. •Such forms will be supplied by local government. EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENT To: (name and address of the applicant) The proposal by to undertake ji (name of applicant) the following development (be specific) upon the following property II (legal description, i.e. , section to the nearest quarter section) within and/or its associated (name of water area) wetlands is exempt from the requirement of a substantial development permit because the development III (Identify exemptions as outlined in WAC 173-14-040) (Corps Public Notice Number if Available) The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with: CHECK ONE CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT ❑ ❑ Policies of the Shoreline Management Act ❑ ❑ The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no master program has been finally approved 0 or adopted by the department. ❑ The master program (Date) (Signature of Authorized Local Governmental Official) 10. I�� AMD WAC 173-14-120 PERMITS FOR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Each permit for a substantial development, which may include a conditional use and/or variance issued by local government shall contain a provision that construction pursuant to the permit will not begin and is not authorized until forty-five ! (45) days from the date of filing of the final order by local government with the department of ecology regional office and the attorney general; or until all review proceedings initiated within forty-five (45) days from the date of such filing have been terminated. Such permit shall be in substantially the following form. Such form will be supplied by local government. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT (Consecutive but beginning with No. 1) NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR Application No. LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY Administering Agency (city or county) Date received Approved Denied Date Type of Action (Check if appropriate) ❑ Substantial Development Permit ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to (name of applicant) to undertake the following development (be specific) upon the following property (legal description, i.e. , section, (to the nearest quarter section) , township, range) The project will within shorelines of state- ! (be/not be) wide significance (RCW 90.58.030) . The project will be located within a designation. The (environment) following master program provisions are applicable to this 11. development (state the master program sections or page numbers) Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions This permit is granted pursuant to the shoreline manage- ment act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the shoreline management act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) . This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or II conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR II IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED. (Date) (Signature of Authorized Local Government Official) THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO II A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE. Date received by Department of Ecology Approve Denied This substantial development permit with conditional use/variance is approved by the department of ecology pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pur- suant to the following additional terms and conditions: (Date) (Signature of Authorized Department of Ecology Official) 12. II it NEW WAC 173-14-130 SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS WITH CONDITIONAL USES AND VARIANCES. After taking action on a substantial development permit designated to be a conditional use or variance in an approved master program, local govern- ment shall submit said permit to the department for its approval, approved with conditions (with concurrence of local government) or denial. NEW WAC 173-14-140 DEFINITIONS AND OBJECTIVES OF CONDITIONAL USE. Conditional uses are specifically described within the master program. The objective of a conditional use pro- vision is to provide more control and flexibility for imple- menting the regulations of the master program. With provi- sions to control the undesirable effects, the range of uses within each of the designated environments can be expanded to include additional uses. NEW WAC 173-14-150 VARIANCES. A variance deals with specif- ic requirements of the master program and its objective is to grant relief when there are practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the master program. A variance will be granted only after the applicant can demonstrate in addition to satisfying the procedures set forth in WAC 173-14-130 the following: (1) That if he complies with the provisions of the master program, he cannot make any reasonable use of his prop- erty. The fact that he might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the program is not a sufficient reason for a variance. (2) That the hardship results from the application of. the requirements of the act and master programs, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. (3) That the variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the master program. ' (4) That the public welfare and interest will be pre- served. NEW WAC 173-14-160 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REVIEW. The department shall render and so notify local government and the permittee of its final decision approving or disapproving a permit for a conditional use or variance within thirty (30) days of the filing by local government pursuant to WAC 173- 14-090. Local government shall notify those interested persons having contacted local government pursuant to WAC 173-14-070 of said final discussion. NEW WAC 173-14-170 REQUESTS FOR REVIEW. All requests for review of any final permit decisions under chapter 90.58 RCW and chapter 173-14 WAC are governed by the procedures estab- lished in RCW 90.58.180. 13. NEW WAC 173-14-180 ENFORCEMENT ORDERS BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. (1) Local government and the department of ecology shall have the authority to serve upon a person undertaking, or about to undertake development as defined in RCW 90.58.030 (3) (d) , a regulatory order if: (a) The development constitutes an integral part of substantial development being undertaken, or about to be undertaken, on the shorelines of the state in the absence of a substantial development permit; or (b) The development being undertaken, although an inte- gral part of a project approved by an existing, valid substan- tial development permit is outside the scope and intent of said permit; or (c) The development being undertaken on the shorelines of the state is in violation of RCW 90.58.020, and the• following: (i) Prior to the formal adoption or approval of the department of ecology of a master program for the area, the guidelines (chapter 173-14 WAC) , and (ii) Thereafter the master program for the area. (2) The regulatory order shall set forth or contain: (a) The specific nature, extent and time of violation, and the damage or potential damage; (b) An order that the violation or the potential viola- tion cease and desist or, in appropriate cases, the specific corrective action to be taken within a specific and reasonable time; and (c) The right of the person to whom the order is directed to a hearing before the Shorelines Hearings Board. (3) A regulatory order issued pursuant hereto shall become effective immediately upon receipt by the person to whom the order is directed and shall become final unless review is requested pursuant to WAC 173-14-210. I11 , NE WAC 173-14-190 HEARINGS ON REGULATORY ORDERS. (1) The I person to whom the order is directed may request review to the Shorelines Hearings Board within thirty days after being served. The requirements of RCW 90.58.180(1) and chapter 461-08 WAC shall apply to all said requests for review, provided, however, that there shall be no requirement for such requests to be filed with and certified by the department of ecology and the attorney general. (2) All hearings held pursuant to this provision and judicial review thereof shall be in accordance with the rules establishing the Shorelines Hearings Board contained in chapter 90.58 RCW and to chapter 461-08 WAC. • 14. A WAC 173-14-050 APPLICATION OF THE PERMIT SYSTEM TO SUB- STANTIAL DEVELOPMENT UNDERTAKEN PRIOR TO THE ACT. Substantial development undertaken on the shorelines of the state prior to the effective date of the Act shall not require a permit ex- cept under the following circumstances: (1 ) Where the activity was unlawful prior to the effect- ive date of the Act. (2) Where there has been an unreasonable period of dor- mancy in the project between its inception and the effective date of the Act. (3) Where the development is not completed within two years after the effective date of the Act. (4) Where substantial development occurred prior to the effective date of the Act on a shoreline and continued on to a different lake, river or tributary after the effective date, a permit shall be required for the development undertaken after the effective date. Substantial development undertaken prior to the effective date of the Act shall not continue without a permit into other phases that were not part of the plan being followed at the time construction commenced. * WAC 173-14-050 was inadvertently deleted from this printing of current Amendment to WAC 173-14. 050 was not amended and is to be included herein as a regulation. \ r ^>_.. THE CITY -OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT pAp� <4 42. 235 - 2550 4T10SEP-1 October 23 , 1975 D . Rodney Mack , Acting Division Head Shorelands Division Office of Land Programs Department of Ecology Olympia , Washington 98504 RE : SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM AMENDMENTS Dear Mr . Mack : Attached for your review and approval is Resolution No . 2003 , Amendments to the June 1974 Edition of the Shoreline Master Program and the June 1974 Edition of the Shoreline Master Program. These amendments are in response to your Department ' s letter of September 5 , 1974 . Should you have any questions , please contact this Department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director Gary R . Kruger Associate Planner Attachment cc : Avery Garrett , Mayor Charles Delaurenti , Council Pres . Del Mead , City Clerk ✓ GRK:ms AMENDMENTS TO THE JUNE . 1974 EDITION OF THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM - I ' PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT ,I 4 1 . 03 Item 6 is to read: "Construction on wetlands by an owner , lessee or contract purchaser of a single family 1 residence for his own use olr for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade level :" - 9 2 .02.01 The fee schedule is to be revised as - follows : - FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT , I $ 50 Less than $10,000 $ 75 $10 ,000 but less than $50,000 $100 $50 ,000 to $100;000 $150 More than $100,000 '! 48 7.04.01 This section is to read as follows : "General :, All bulkheads are subject to the regulations set forth in this master program., except that bulkheads common to a single-family residence are exempted from the permit system set forth in this Master Program. " . ' 48 7. 04.02C The subsection is to read as follows : "The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed engineer , and the design has been approved by the Renton Department of Public Works . " 55 7 .08. O1A The subsection is to read as follows : "For detached single-family residential uses when the property is located. between two (2) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity provided the fill does not exceed one hundred twenty-five ( 125-) feel in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five (35) feet into the water and provided the provisions of Section 8.02 .01 through 8. 02 .05 are satisfac- torily met; or , " - • -2- PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 59 7. 12 .02C The subsection is to read as follows : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect. " 59 7 . 12 . 03 The title of the Section is :to read as follows : "Design Criteria for Single-Family Docks" 60 7 .12. 03C (1)a The subsection is to read as follows : "The dock may extend thirty I (30) feet into the water or until a depth of eight (8) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100) feet. " 61 7 . 12. 06 The section should read as follows : "A. The following dock specifications shall be allowed : • ( 1 ) Unless otherwise determined or directed by any; State agency having jurisdiction thereover , the dock may extend into the water one hundred fifty (150) feet if the depth of thirty (30) feet is not reached ; the dock may be extended until a depth of thirty (30) feet is reached provided the dock Hdoes not exceed two hundred fifty (250) feet. (2) The maximum width shall be twelve ( 12) feet. (3) If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the water ' d edge. B. Docks shall be placed no closer than thirty (30) feet to a side property line. " 1 7 7 . 19 . 03A2 In the fifth line change "8. 21. O1C" to "7 . 19. 01C" 70 7 . 19. 03B In the ninth line change "8 . 21 . 01C" to "7 . 19. 01C" • i PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT I 74 8. 01 At the end of the section , add the following sentence: "Both variances. and conditional use permits are for- warded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . " 75 8. 04 (new) The following section is to be created and added : Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written communication is received by the applicant and the City indicating otherwise . • i . City of Renton Planning Department October 16, 1975 1 • • / c r._ I RESOLUTION NO . 2003 ! I jWHEREAS the CITY OF RENTON heretofore adopted . I I that certain "SHORELINE MASTER• PROGRAM" in June of 1974 , I pursuant to City of Renton Resolution No . 1912 , and in compliance with the requirements of the SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 19711,as amended, (Chapter 90 . 58 RCW) , and j ! WHEREAS the Department of Ecology thereafter requested the I Consideration and adoption of certain amendments , and ! i 1 WHEREAS such matter was duly considered by the City and various committees and departments , and ; • WHEREAS it is deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest to , prbvide for certain amendments as per the recommendation Of the I ,.f.; Community Services Committee of the City Council , dated August 13 , 1975 , I and 4 , I WHEREAS the City heretofore issued its draft Environmental Impact IStateinent relating to the adoptionrof such "SHORELINE MASTER. PROGRAM" , ' !now therefore , 1 1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY "OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE , i AS FOLLOWS : I I •iSECTION I : The City Clerkl is hereby authorized and directed to 1 forward a copy of this Resolution,', together with the City' s , "SHORELINE . !MASTER PROGRAM" , as amended , to' the Department of Ecology , Olympia, Washington, for its final approval. . F i ' : t; Upon such final approval , the provisions of said Master Pr:ogtam shall constitute use regulations for the various affected ( shorelines located within the City of Renton and as further set forth in said "SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM'! , as amended . : I ;. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of october , 1975 . ' 1 Delores A. Mead, City 'lerk ! APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of octobe , 1975 . 1- • I v-er`Y 'Garrett , -Mayor Ap oved as to form: = `/ ,gip. �y,�}•�' .,'r , lerara i . 5he�llan' CityAttorney Y 1 r j , 6)44 Renton City Council Meeting 10/20/75 - Page 5 Approval of Finance Committee Chairman Schellert reported recommendation of the VOUCHERS Finance Committee to approve Vouchers No. 6525 through 6731 for payment, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or 1 services have been received or rendered, plus Revenue Fund Warrant No. R-4, CashFund Warrant No. C-4, $3,135.00 (LID 288) and Revenue Warrant No. R-4, Cash Fund Warrant No. C-4, $2,077.60 (LID 291 ) . MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF VOUCHERS NO. 6525 THROUGH 6731 . Vouchers 6518 - 6524 machine voided. CARRIED. I � ORDINANCES & Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented ordinance amending the RESOLUTIONS Massage Parlor ordinance for first reading. Following reading, it was Massage Parlor MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO REFER BACK TO THE LEGISLATION Ordinance'' COMMITTEE. CARRIED r Transfer & Approp. Legislation Committee report recommended ordinance to transfer and of Funds for appropriate funds to finance various Community Developments as approved Communityi Dev.l by H.U.D. be placed on first reading. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, TO REFER BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance 2977 Legislation Committee report recommended second and final readings of Consolidated 1972 an ordinance establishing a Consolidated 1972 Bond Redemption! Fund Bond Redemption for administrative and accounting purposes. Following readings, it Fund ' j was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Resolution 2003 Legislation Committee report recommended adoption of a Resolution Providing for approving the Master Shoreline Program as amended. Following reading, Amendments to it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THAT THIS RESOLUTION BE Shoreline Master ADOPTED AS READ AND SENT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO TRANSMIT TO Program ; THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution 2004 Legislation Committee report 'recommended adoption of a Resolution Reaffirming ) reaffirming its confidence in and commitment to the activities and Commitment to the actions of the Puget Sound Council of Governments and affirms its Puget Sound (Coun- intent to continue its membership in said body. Following reading, cil of Govts. it was MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. ROLL CALL: AYES: 6, NO: 1 , SCHELLERT. ' MOTION CARRIED. 1 i Resolution 2005 Legislation Committee report recommended adoption of a Resolution Public Hearing ' setting the date of November 10, 1975 for a Public Hearing on vaca- Set - Street tion of a street in the vicinity of Lind Ave. N.W. and Stevens Ave. N.W. , Vacation formerly known as Renton St. Following reading, it was MOVED BY 11/10/75 1 STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS 'READ Gary Vigoren AND SET DATE OF NOVEMBER 10, 1975 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Resolution 2006 Legislation Committee report recommended adoption of a Resolution Final Plat approving Final Plat of the Kennydale Park Addition, locatedjon Kennydale Park N.E. 27th St. between Edmonds Ave. N.E. and Aberdeen Ave: N.E. Addition Following reading, it was MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Audience Comment Mr. Mike Smith, 3402 N.E. 7th St. ,' comnented that he felt the Council had made a poor decision on the matter of the Highlands Church of Christ. Adjournment MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED, BY GRANT, TO ADJOURN. The meeting adjourned at 12:32 A.M. I j m4 -0Z Delores A. Mead, City clan jft MI i WARRANT DISTRIBUTION 10/20/75 FUND TOTAL WARRANTS MACHINE VOID: NO.# 6518 - #6524 CURRENT. FUND $71, 808,65 PARKS AND RECREATION FUND $24, 192, 15 ` ARTERIAL STREET FUND $408921131 I STREET FU D $24, 3 19,32 ' I LIBRARY F D $9,2 4.21 WORK INCE ITIVE FUND ( WIN•) $t 4,09 CAREERS $2 2t62 CETA FUND $5, 2 4909 STREET FOR' ARD THRUST $11,4 1r06 T $6 8126 URBAN AR E IAL FUND 1975 WATER b SEWER CONSTR $2, 340,05 WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND $107, 263, 10 AIRPORT FU ; D $6,75502 EQUIPMENT "ENTAL $841710179 TOTAL OF AIL WARRANTS $277, 35�,42 I WE, HE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF I RENTON CITYICOUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT , MERCMANDISE '1AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 6525 THROUGH NO. 6731 IN THE MOUNT OF $277, 57. 42 THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBE- 975. ` :I /1. E� \,., COMMITTEE C 'AIRMAN - 4• EMBER ..,.;i`. -,e...--.\" '`lts. I N.,.b..C. %! . L. I .D.#288 MEMBER • . I - w w REVENUE FUND Warrant No.#R-4 $3, 135.00 I CASH FUND Warrant No.#C-4 $3, 135.00 L. I .D.#291 REVENUE FUND Warrant No.#R-4 $2,077.60 CASH FUND Warrant No.#C-4 $2,077.60 1 cgx-vdti-dki c}ram LEGISLATION COMMITTEE REPORT OCTOBER 20 , 1975 The Legislation Committee recommends the following: 1. To be placed on first reading only, an ordinance amending the Massage Parlor Ordinance . 2 . To be placed on first reading only, an ordinance regarding transfer and appropriation of funds for community development. 3. To be placed on second and final reading, an ordinance creating a 1972 Bond Redemption Fund Consolidation for accounting purposes . 4 . To be adopted, a resolution approving the Master Shoreline Program as amended. 5. To be adopted, a resolution reaffirming a commitment to the Puget Sound Council of Governments . 6 . To be adopted, a resolution setting the date for a public hearing for November 10 , 1975 , on vacation of street formerly known as Renton Street. 7. To be adopted, a resolution for the approval of a final plat for the Kennydale Park addition. Chairman Earl Clymer Henry E. Schellert George J. Perry EC:mg OF V 'j THE CITY OF RENTON n MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 0 i AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR � PLANNING DEPARTMENT .45 o9�T tip SEPTt'46 235 - 2550 • MEMORANDUM October 16-, 1975 • TO : Earl Clymer , Chairman , Legislation Committee George Perry , Member Henry Schellert , Member FROM: Gary. R. Kruger , Associate Planner RED : SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Attached for your review and incorporation to the resolution to be sent to the Department of Ecology are proposed amend- ments to the June 1974 edition of the City ' s Shoreline Master Program. These amendments are the ones presented at the October 6 , 1975 p101ic hearing except for the incorporation of a minor amend- ment suggested by the City .Attorney ' s Office in a letter dated October 9 , 1975 on Commercial and Industrial Dock standards) (page 61 , Section 7 . 12 . 06) . Should you have any questions , please contact this Departmnt. Attachments . cc : Avery. Garrett , Mayor Charles Delaurenti , Council President Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney • Del Mead , City Clerk 5 E 7 Bob Hughes , Legislative Aide 3 6 sOA GRK:mas g py01� I I � I AMENDMENTS TO THE JUNE . 1974 EDITION OF THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 4 1 . 03 Item 6 is to. read : "Construction on wetlands by an owner , lessee or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use Or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade level ." 9 2 . 02 .01 The fee schedule is to be revised as follows : - __ • FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT $ 50 Less than $10 ,000 $ 75 $10 ,000 but less than $50 ,000 $100 $50 ,000 to $100 ,000 $150 More than $100,000 48 7 . 04. 01 This section is to read as follows : "General : All bulkheads are subject to the regulations set forth in this master program , except that bulkheads common to a single-family residence are exempted from the permit system • set forth in this Master Program . " 48 7 . 04. 02C The subsection is to read as follows : "The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed engineer , andlthe design has been approved by the Renton it Department of Public Works . 'j 55 7 .08. 01A The subsection is to read as follows : "For detached single-family residential uses when the property is located between two (2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity provided the fill does not exceed one hundred twenty-five ( 125 ) feet in length along the waters 'ledge and thirty-five (35) feet into the water and provided the provisions of Section' 8 . 02 . 01 through 8 . 02 . 05 are satisfac- torily met ; or , " -2- PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 59 7 . 12 .02C The subsection is to read as follows : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architliect. " 59 7 . 12 . 03 The title of the Section is to read as follows : "Design Criteria for Single-Family Docks" 60 7 .12 . 03C (1 )a The subsection is to read as follows : "Tile dock may extend thirty (30) feet into the water or until a depth of eight (8) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100) feet . " 61 7 . 12 . 06 The section should read as follows : "A. The following dock specifications shall be allowed : • (1 ) Unless otherwise determined or directed by any State agency having jurisdiction thereover , the dock may extend into the water one hundred fifty ( 150 ) feet if the depth of thirty (30) feet is not reached ; the dock may be extended until a depth of thirty (30) feet is reached provided the dock does not exceed two hundred fifty (250) feet . (2 ) The maximum width shall be twelve ( 12) feet. (3) If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the water ' ,t edge . B. Docks shall be placed no closer than thirty (30) feet to a side property line . " 70 7 . 19 . 0.3A2 In the fifth line change "8 . 21 . O1C" to "7 . 19. 01C" 710 7 . 19 . 03B In the ninth line change "81. 21 . 01C" to "7 . 19. 01C" -3- PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 74 8. 01 At the end of the section , add the following sentence: "Both variances and conditional use permits are for- warded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . " 75 8. 04 (new) The following section is to be created and added : Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written communication is received by the applicant and the City indicating otherwise . City of Renton Planning Department October 16 , 1975 � I L,,,__.t,____ R J, / Y( 1,, . , . , ,),,,,, ,i . () . ...,y . 1 ,7,:, , „...5. ,,,, .,, L. ,. \iv _ , y U e`P T ,. t7;,; ., OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON z • w€ - o 0 �I _ ^�i • POST OFFICE BOX 528, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8878 rl �AO� f II E���� GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY vrsEPS October 9 , 1975 0 11, • I d Mri. Gary Kruger and the Planning Department City ;Hail Renton , WA 98055 1,1 Re: Shoreline Master Program' proposed amendments ,I • . Gentlemen: . ILs ' is in reference to your Memorandum dated September 30 , 1975 which was discussed at the lat Council meeting October 6. Additional input was received fromJ-,r. Jim Haz, cen ; attorney at law, who I . represents one of the property owners affected. I We have noted the remarks made by Mr. Hanken-. and possible conflict with, any action or directive by another State agency. In order to foreclose any such possible conflict , we would sugp-,est that ' the following' amendment be made to Section 7. 12A6 (commercial avid industrial docks) so that same will read as follows : I "Unless otherwise determined or directed by any State ,I agency having jurisdiction thereover, the dock may ' extend into the water 150 feet - -. -H . It (would .seem that this addition should, at least for the time being , resolve the matter satisfactorily and we would recommend its acceptance, I After this has been approved by the Legislation Committee, we would suggest that th-is Section be amended accordingly and a Resolution or OrdinanceOrdinance passed to adopt the Master Program. 4 If i��ate' can be of any further help to you in i s patter, fie I'I retain , I I . Very truly yours , 11 (�99'�,( I° Gerard M. ,Shellan GMS:ds . c 0 p y 1.1 1., . 1.1 I I � RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 6, 1975 Municipal Building Monday, :00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF CHARLES DELAURENTI , Council President; HENRY SCHELLERT, WILLIAM GRANT, COUNCIL KENNETH BRUCE, EARL CLYMER, RICHARD STREDICKE, GEORGE PERRY. CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL, IN ATTENDANCE Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works . Director; DEL BENNETT, Airport Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; GEORGE WILLIAMS, Fire Chief; DON STARK, Administrative Assistant; BOB HUGHES, Legislative Aide; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director; G. Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; and VIC TeGANTVOORT, Street Super'ntendant. PRESS IN Eric Pryne, News Editor, Renton Record Chronicle; Mary Wilbert Smith, , ATTENDANCE Editor, Greater Renton News. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY DELAURENTI, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 22, 1975 BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This beingthe date set an• proper notices -havin seen u•lishe•p p g p poste,' Shoreline M s.ter. and mailed, Mayor Garrett opened the Public Hearing on the Shoreline Program Master Program. Chairman Clymer of the Community Services Committee (Cant' d from [ remarked that the Committee had met and gone over the changes step by 9/8/75) step and made the recommendations that appear in the final draft. Mr. Robert McBeth, Chairman of the Shoreline Management Committee was in attendance at the meeting and the changes seem to agree with what his AUDIENCE Committee recommended. Mr. Robert McBeth thanked the Council and said COMMENT the Shoreline Management Committee endorsed the changes and compromises. Mr. James Hanken, 1114 Norton Building, Seattle, Attorney for Barbee Mills, remarked that there was ,one specific area with which the City might have problems , Section 7. 12.05, which is Commercial and Industrial Docks as it relates to conflict with Department of Natural Resources and Department of Ecology regulations and as it pertains to conmerce and navigation, 250 feet not extending far enough to reach the harbor line, thus prohibiting business operations as allowed by State Constitu- tion. He suggested legal opinion of the City Attorney be rendered as to conflict with the Shoreline Management Act and other regulations. Since there was no other comments from the audience, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY THAT THE HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDA- -. TIONS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE LEGAL DEPART- MENT AND THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. PROCLAMATIOF . Mayor Garrett introduced United States Navy Recruiting Officers Dave United Stat-s Lyon, J. E. Monaghan and J. A. Kirpes. Proclamation of Mayor Garrett Navy Day declared October 13, 1975 as United States; Navy Day and urged all citizens October 13, 1975 to join in the observance of this salute to our Naval forces, who have served our nation since its inception as the Continental Navy in 1775. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , THAT THE CITY' COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S PROCLAMATION. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Garrett presented the proclamation to Officer Lyon, who in turn, presented the Mayor with a plaque naming him an Honorary Recruiting Officer for the Navy. Executive ll MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , THAT THE COUNCIL CONVENE IN Session EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE BOEING COMPANY LEASE. MOTION CARRIED. Council withdrew for Executive Session at 8:30 P.M. and reconvened at 8:42 P.M. with all Councilmen present as previously reported. Acceptance of MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT THE LETTER FROM PUBLIC Slurry Seal WORKS DIRECTOR GONNASON RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT COM- Project in PLETION OF THE ROLLING HILLS SLURRY SEAL PROJECT, C.A.G 052-75I AS OF Rolling Hills OCTOBER 6, 1975 , BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ,--- Renton City Council Meeting 10/6/75 - Page 2 I Claim for Dam.ges It was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT THE CLAIM FOR Wayne T. McCa n DAMAGES BY WAYNE T. MCCANN TRUCKING FOR ALLEGED DAMAGE TO HIS TRUCK Trucking, Inc AT THE MONSTER ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING AND THE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES OF Claim for Dam.ges WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS FOR ALLEGED DAMAGES TO THEIR TRUCK AT 55 WILLIAMS Washington am. AVE. S. BE REFERRED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE INSURANCE CARRIER. NalGas Co. MOTION CARRIED. Transfer of F nds Letter from Mayor Garrett requested an ordinance appropriating a grant Community Dev of $71 ,708.00 (funding approved by H.U.D. for the Community Development Fed. Funds to Program:)to the Planning Department account to disburse directly after Planning Dept vouchers are submitted to the County. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, Housing & Hea th TO REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Care MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT THE QUESTION OF A PREVENTA- TIVE HEALTH PROGRAM BE REFERRED TO THE SENIOR CITIZENS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Dev Letter from Mayor Garrett informed that the City of Renton's Community Program - 197e Development Program for 1976 is in the process of being established with a definition of specific program requests that will be submitted to King County and requested that this program be referred to the Community Services Committee to work with the Planning Department and the Auman Resources Coordinator to assist in developing programs for submittal . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO REFER TO THE COMMUNITY' SERVICES COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Street Vacati • Letter from Board of Public Works Chairman Del Bennett recommended that Gary Vigoren the Council proceed with the vacation of property located on N.W. 5th N.W. 5th St. St. , between Lind Ave. N.W. and Stevens Ave. N.W., contingent uppn secur- Between Lind ' ing a minimum 20-foot utility easement (10 feet on either side of the Ave. N.W. & existing sanitary sewer line) . MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY CLYMER, TO Stevens Ave. .W. REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR A RESOLUTION FIXING HEARING DATE. CARRIED. Street Vacati Letter from Mr. Louis G. Malesis, 2822 N.E. 8th Place, requested' that County Road 8 � the City, by Resolution, initiate the vacation of a portion of County also known as Road No. 80, also known as S. 3rd St. Extension. He also noted' that - S. 3rd St. Ex . a portion of the same right-of-way had recently been vacated for Mr. Louis G. Male is Robert L. Edwards, at which time the City had also recommended that the remaining portion be vacated. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY1 SCHELLERT, THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Offer of EAA Lean Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason informed of offer of S.W. 43rd (S. I180)Financial Aid from the State Economic Assistance Authority (EAA) St. , East to est in the form of a low-interest (5%) loan in the amount of $87,000, Valley Road representing the matching funds which the State must provide inorder to legalize the authorization of a $348,000 federal grant for Phase I of the joint project between Renton and Kent for improvement of the jointly owned S.W. 43rd St./S. 180th St. , between the East and West Valley Roads and recommended Council authorize acceptance of the loan, the financial responsibility for repayment will be shared equally by Renton and Kent. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT,, THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT. Public Works Director Gonnason remarked that Kent had the same matter on their Agenda for tonight and will recommend the same action. MOTION CARRIED. Kennydale Par Letter from Planning Director Eric.ksen reported completion of review Addition P1 . of the Planning Commission on the Final Plat for the Kennydale Park Approval Addition, property located on N.E. 27th St. , between Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Appl . No. and Edmonds Ave. N.E. , the Preliminary Plat having been approved by FP-836-75 the Council on February 3, 1975. The letter also noted that the Final Stanford C. Plat had been reviewed by concerned City departments and is in conformance' Witsoe with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Appeal of Pla ning • Letter from Mr. Gary Moritz, 2525 N.E. 24th St. , appealed the Planning Commission De 1- sion - Rezone Commission decision to deny his Rezone Application #R-821-75 from G to Gary Moritz B-1 for property located on Union Ave. N.E. in the vicinity of N.E. 4th St. and recommended zoning of R-3. Upon inquiry, City Clerk Mead % 1 q. r CITY OF RENTON 4J\ inY: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY II RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 6th day of October , 19 75 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : { Amendments to the City's Shoreline Master Program. (Continued from September 8, 1975) • • • {I. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON .a.d 'Delores A. Mead , City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION September 12, 1975 CERTIFICATION• • • • STATE OF WAS'HINGTON) ss . • COUNTY OF KING ) tr I ► L. I s herebythat �ou7��ee1�1 �� c?,S�le �- . �f?) 1� � certify tl ( ) copies of the above notice were posted by me'' in ,JYzeht-hie conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City unicipal Building , Rentonl, Washington on date of ,-Sedgy -t j ,�p>> , 19 72 Signed pl,Q ,5 ATTEST : c_ lio,Vary `Public in and for the State -f Washi�,gton , residing at Renton. _ , OF , C ! 'Y: " THE CITY OF RENTON L,. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.S 98055 OVA AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 04) Q` CITY CLERK TEo SEPSC-w September 30, 1975 i II STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 30th of September, 1975, at the hour of 5:00 P.M. your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, Washington, as Printed Matter, Proposed Amendments to Shoreline Master Program dated September 30, 1975 to all plan recipients and other interested parties as furnished by the Renton Planning Department on the Propsed Master Shoreline Program; per attached list. 4Eui71$t1 Q. 7444-ot Delores A. Mead, City Clerk, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 30th Day of September, 1975. '1 \\03-\ )r)'\ U:v1, • ' -Notary Public in and fors t}e State of Washington, residing- in-(Renton cc: Gary Kruger er P'.;+ - Mr. Dwight Potter Mr. Bill Collins D. R. Mansfield The Boeing Company 5301 Ripley Lane N. ' J.H. Baxter & Co. Box 3707-Mail Stop 62-15 Renton, Wa. 98055 P .O. Box 568 ' Seattle , Wa. 9814 Renton, Wa. • 98055 Mr. James E. Denzer Mr. Jack Smith Lou Bergen 3613 Lake Wa. Blvd. N. 5221 Ripley Lane N. 5029 Ripley Lane N. Renton, Wa. 98055 _ Renton, Wa. 98055 , Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. R. DeBoer Mr . Dick Houghton Stoneway : Mr. Jon Robinson Utilities Eng. P .O . Box 509 3811 Lake Wa.' Blvd. N. City Hall Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton Mr. Robert .Rauscher Mrs. Wm. Arthalony Burlington Northern R.R. ; Mrs . T.C. Buckingham 2332 N.E. 31st 830 Central Building 5025 Ripley Lane N. Renton, Wa. 98055 • Seattle, Wa. 98104., ' Renton, Wa. 98055 M � . . ' Mr. Wilks J. Sullivan ' Mr. Robert Etyr Mrs. Nina Young . 623 S .W. 158th St. • Boeing Co-Space Center 2224 N.E.' 31st Seattle , Wa. 98166 . Kent, Wa. 98031 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Don Cowles Miss Isobel Kemmer Burlington Northern R.R. P. M. Jordan' - 2415 N.E . 31st 830 Central Bldg. 2505 Maple Valley Hwy Renton, Wa. 98055 Seattle, Wa. 98104 Renton, Wa. 98055 • • Mrs . Bonnie R. Tabor Blanche Kairinen Mr. Robert Martindale 3509 S .E . 7th St. 1205 Shelton S .E . 616 Stevens 'Ave . N. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 - Renton, Wa. 98055 Jane Shafer D. 0 . Norman • Margaret Anderson League of Women Voters P.O . Box 477 6827 RIPLEY Lane N. 505 N. Central Renton, Wa,. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 . Kent, Wa. 98031 Mr. James Hanken Mr. Robert K. Butler. George S. Wenctillk 1114 Norton Bldg . • 2501 East D 15708 64th N.E. Seattle, Wa. 98104 Tacoma, Wa. 98421 ' Bothell, Wa. 98011 Milwaukee R.R. Elizabeth Rivily Mr. Richard York 524 Seneca N.W. • 4632 149th S.E. Renton, Wa. 98055 - . Bellevue, Wa. 98007 - Mr. John F. Parks R.C.B. Marshall 5227 Ripley Lane N. I 2909 Mt. View Ave . Po.,+nn _ 'GM _ 92055 : pc„tnn. Wa... 98055 T i H. E. Hurst Mr. Clifton F. Garrison Milwaukee Railroad 13 158th Place NE Mr. Don Humble • Rm 669 White-Henry Stewart Bellevue, Wa 98008 360 Stevens Ave SW Seattle, Wa 98101 ; Renton, Wa 98055 Merl E. Shaw Mr. Kay Johnson M . Robert J. jPhelps 3107 Mt. View N. Renton C. of C. Renton, Wa 98055 300 Rainier Ave. N 3821 Lake Wa Blvd N Renton, Wa .98055 Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. Lloyd,.Lindberg D. Rodney Mack • Mr. Stewart W. Pope 3111 Mt. View Ave. N Shoreline Div Land Prog. „ 3713 Talbot Road S. Renton, Wa 98055 Department Ecology = Renton, Wa 98055 Olympia, Wa 98504 B. G. Morrison - Mr. Robert McBeth Mr. Robert W. iSchalke 3011 Mt View Ave N. 1632 Lincoln Court SE 664 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, Wa 98055 Renton, Wa 98055 , Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. Charles Guy Mr. Arthur D. Scholes Sierra Club 3101 SE 5th St 1708 Ferndale SE 43342 University Way NE Renton, Wa 98055 Renton, Wa 98055 Seattle, W 98104 Mr. Dick York Sharon Neglay 2121 5th Ave 656 Lind Ave. NW Seattle, Wa, 98121 Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. Paul Horn Mr. Robert Bignol 27423 220th Place SE 1308 Thomas Lane - Apt 107 Kent, Wa 98031 Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. David L. DeVore Mr. Alex Cugini , Jr. 6928 S. 120th P1 611 Renton Ave Seattle, Wa 98178 Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. Gary Mix Mr. William C. Goddard 3707 Lake Wa Blvd N. Puget Power Bldg. Bellevue, Wa 98004 Renton, Wa 98055 Mr. Tim Okimura Dorothy Herbert 5642 116th Place SE 3923 NE 6th St = Bellevue, Wa 98004 Renton, Wa 98055 i 1 i j RI,, , c: aniR 1. THE CITY OF RENTON m MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ®,p 4;7 AVERYGARRETT, MAYOR v PLANNING DEPARTMENT k, 235 - 2550 4)4TEDSEP1��O September 30 , 1975 MEMORANDUM TO : All Recipients FROM: Planning Department RE : Shoreline Master Program i Proposed Amendments The attached pages , dated September 30 , 1975 , are proposed amendments to the June 1974 edition of the proposed , Shoreline Master Program. These amendments have been prepared by the City Council Community Services Committee for public comment at the Monday , October 6 , 1975 , public hearing . The amendments are noted by underlining . A comparison of the pages will show the proposed changes . Attachments r -4- SEP 30 1915 of the water or shorelines . As part of that permit system , the following are considered general exceptions to the per- mit ' requirement : 1 . Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures,. 2 . Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single family residences . 3 . Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements . 4 . Construction of barns or similar agricultural buildings . 5 . Construction or modification of navigational aids . ! 6 . Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee or con- tract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet 1 above average grade level . 7 . Construction of a dock designed for pleasure craft only, for the non-commercial use of the owner of a single family residence , the cost of which does not exceed $2 ,500 . 00 . However, any development which occurs within the city' s shore- line , as defined by the act, whether it requires a permit or not , must be consistent with the intent of the state law . , Under the shoreline permit system herein established , administrative responsibility lies with the Planning Depart- ment , but the permits are reviewed in the event of dispute: by the Planning Commission which has the authority to approve' or deny permit applications . Liberal provisions for appeal of permit decisions are also provided . In compliance with the second requirement of the act ,; the Renton Planning Department conducted a comprehensive inventory of the natural characteristics , present land uses , . and patterns of ownership along the city' s shoreline . The inventory was completed in October , 1972 , and provided a substantial basis for the development of this master program. The environments and specific use regulations reflect the local conditions that are documented in that inventory . In compliance with the third requirement of the act , the City of Renton , with the help of its local citizens , has _g_ p 30 1915 I i SECTION 2 . PROCEDURES 1 I 201 Information Prior to Submitting Application Prior to ' submitting an application for a substantial development permit or an exemption from a substantial development permit , the applicant should informally discuss a pro- 1 posed development with the Planning Department . This ' I will enable the applicant to become familiar with the requirements of this Master Program, Planning Department i procedures , and enforcement procedures . 2 . 02 • Substantial Development Permits 1 2 . 02 . 01 Application Forms and Fees No substantial develop1 ment shall be undertaken on shorelines of the City , without first obtaining a "substantial developments permit" from the Planning Department . Application for such permits shall be made on forms and in a procedure prescribed by the Planning Department . Application forms may be revised from time to time by the Planning Depart- ment without prejudice to any existing applications . Such forms should be designed to obtain for the Planning Department such information as is necessary to detiermine whether such a permit is justified. Applications, shall be made by the property owner, or his authorized algent , purchaser, or other person entitled to lessee , contract . possession of the property , and except for applications • filed- by or on behalf of the City or other governmental agencies , shall be accompanied by a receipt issued by the Finance Department showing payment of the applicable fees which are hereby imposed as follows : FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT i I I $50 Less than $10 ,000 $75 $ 10 , 000 but less than $50 , 0001 $100 $50 ,000 to $ 100 ,000 I $150 More than $ 100 ,000 2 : 02 . 02 Publishing and Posting The applicant shall cause; to be published notices thereof once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation i t I, , -48 • - sEP 30 '1975 7 . 04 Bulkheads 7: 04. 01 General : All bulkheads are subject to the regulations set forth in this master program, except that bulk- ] heads common to a single-family residence are exempted from the permit system set forth in this Master Program. 7. 04 . 02 Bulkhead Permitted A bulkhead may be permitted only when : A. Required to protect upland areas or facilities ; land B . Riprap cannot provide the necessary protection; iand C . The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed ] engineer, and the design has been approved by the Renton Department of Public Works . 7 . 04 . 03 Bulkhead and Fill A bulkhead for the purpose of creat- ing land by filling behind the bulkhead, shall be pelr- I ] mitted only when the landfill has been approved. TFhe application for a bulkhead shall be included in the! application for the landfill in this case . 7. 04 . 04 General Design Requirements A. The burden rests upon the applicant for the permit to propose a specific type of bulkhead design which has been approved by a licensed engineer .F B . All approved bulkheads are to be constructed in such a manner as to minimize damage to fish and i ' I shell fish habitat . In evaluating the application for a proposed bulkhead, the Planning Department is to consider the effect of the bulkheads on pub- lic access to publicly owned shorelines . Where possible , bulkheads are to be designed so as not to detract from the aesthetic qualities of the ! shoreline . C . Bulkheads are to be constructed in such a manner as to minimize alterations of the natural shore- line and to minimize adverse effects on nearby] beaches . H D . In cases where bulkheading is permitted, scienti- fic information suggests a rock riprap design should be preferred. The cracks and openings in such a structure afford suitable habitats for I -5 5- SEP 3019751 iI 7 . 08 Landfill 7 . 08 . 01 Landfills shall be permitted only in the following ) cases : , I j A. For detached single-family residential uses when the property is located between two (2) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity provided the fill does not exceed I j one hundred twenty-five (125) feet in length j� along the water' s edge and thirty-five (35) feet I — I I into the water and provided the provisions of Section 8 . 02 . 01 through 8 . 02 . 05 are satisfac- I torily met ; or, B . When a bulkhead is built to protect the existing perimeter land, a landfill shall be approved to bring the contour up to the desired grade ; or C . When in a public use area', landfill would be advantageous to the general public; or , D . When repairs or modifications are required for existing bulkheads and fills ; or, E . When landfill is required for flood control pur- poses ; or, F . Justification for landfill for any other purpose than those listed in subsections A through E only above will be allowedprior a roval with PP II of the Renton Planning Commission . I � i I I ' I � II � i I -59- 7 . 12 Piers and Docks SEP SO i1975 T. 12 . 01 Purpose at- A. A pier or dock is a structure built over or float- ing inr upon the water, used as a landing or moorage place for marine -transport or for residential purposes . B. The use of floating docks in lieu of other types of docks is to be encouraged in those areas where scen- ic values are high and where substantial conflicts with recreational boaters and fishermen will not be created. 7 . 12 . 02 Allowable Construction A. The following permits for construction of pier or docks will be allowed : (1) Piers and docks which provide for public use or marinas . (2) Community piers and docks in new major water front subdivisions . (3) Piers and docks which are constructed fort private joint use by two or more waterfront � I property owners . (4) Private single family residence piers ands docks . �I I (5) Water-dependent commercial and industrials uses . B. The responsibility rests upon the applicant tl affirmatively demonstrate in his application for a permit the need for the proposed pier or dock . C . The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . : 7 . 12 . 03 Design Criteria for Single-Family Docks A . Pier type (1) All piers and docks shall be built of open I ! ' pile construction , except that floating docks may be permitted where there is no danger of significant damage to an ecosystem, where scenic values are high , and where one or more of the following conditions exist : I i -6 0- SEP 30 1975 a. Extreme water depth , beyond the range ;of normal length piling . i I b . A soft bottom condition, providing little support for piling . c . Ledge rock bottom that renders it notifeas- ible to install piling . B . Covered moorage , both permanent and temporary , shall consist of no more than a roof. C . Dock Size Specifications (1) .The following dock specifications shall be allowed : a . The dock may extend thirty (30) feet into the water or until a depth of eight (8) I � feet is reached provided the dock length I i does not exceed one hundred (100) feet . , b . The maximum width of a dock shall be eight (8) feet . I I (2) Any greater dimension than those listed above may be allowed by the Planning Commission for good reason, which shall include, but islnot limited to conditions requiring greater dock .length and construction. D . Dock Location and Spacing (1) No portion of a pier or dock for the sole use of private , single-family residence may lie closer than five (5) feet to an adjacent property line . (2) Two (2) contiguous waterfront properties may locate a joint dock facility on either such property provided there are appropriate restrictive covenants filed for record run- ning with the land. 7 . 12 . 04 Multifamily Residence Docks 1 A. Resident Moorage i i I (1) Moorage at the docks shall be limited to resi- dents of the subdivision, apartments , condo- miniums , or similar developments for which the dock was built . i I -61 - se30 1975 I � I I . B . Maximum Number of Berthing Spaces (1) The ratio of moorage berths to residential units shall be a fraction less than one . 7 . 12 . 05 Use of Buoys and Floats A._ Where feasible , the use of buoys and floats for moorage should be encouraged as an alternative to the construction of piers and docks . Such buoys and floats are to be placed as close to shore as possible in order to minimize hazards to navigation. 7 . 12 . 06 Commercial and Industrial Docks I � A. The following dock specifications shall be allowed : (1) The dock may extend into the water one hundred fifty (150) feet if the depth of thirty (30) feet is not reached; the dock may be extended until a depth of thirty (30) feet is reached provided the dock does not exceed two hundred fifty (250) feet . (2) The maximum width shall be twelve (12) feet . (3) If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the water ' s edge . B . Docks shall be placed no closer than thirty (30) feet to a side property line . I � � � I I I , -70- SEp SO1915 2 . Electrical Distribution Substations Electric- al� I distributions shall be at a wetland location only when there exists no feasible site out of ' I the wetland area and when the screening re- quirements of section 7 . 19 . O1C are met . B : Communications This section applies to telephone ;exchanges including radar transmission .installa- Itions , receiving antennas for cable television and/or radio , and any other facility for the trans- mission of communication systems . Communication I � installation's may be permitted in the shoreline area !only when there exists no feasible site out of the , shoreline and water area and when the screening re- lquirements of section 7 . 19 . O1C are met . In an laesthetic interest , such installations shall be ( located as far as possible from residential , recrea- Itional and commercial activities . C . ! Pipeline Utilities All pipeline utilities shall be underground. When underground projects are com- Ipleted on the bank of a water body or in the wet- ( land of a shoreline, the disturbed area shall be ; restored to the original configuration. Under- - ground utility installations shall be permitted only when the finished installation shall not im- pair the appearance of such areas . d 1 D . Public Access All utility companies shall be I encouraged to provide public access to utility owned. shorelines when such areas are not potentially hazardous to the public . Where utility rights-of way are located near recreational or public use areas , utility companies shall be encouraged to provide said � I I rights-of-way as parking or other public use areas for the adjacent public use area. E . All-Inclusive Utility Corridor When it is neces- sary for more than one (1) major utility to go along the same general route, the common use of a ti Q -7 a- SEP V0 1975 SECTION 8 VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USES . I ,8 . 01 Variances and Conditional Use Permits The Renton Plan- ning Commission shall have authority to grant conditional use permits and variances in the administration of the Renton Master Program. The power to grant variances and conditional use permits should be utilized in a manner which , while protecting the environment , will assure that a person will be able to utilize his property in a fair and equitable manner . It shall be recognized that a lawful use at the time the Master Program is adopted is to be considered a permitted use and maintenance ands I � restoration shall not require a variance or a conditional I i use permit . Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . 8 : 02 Variances Upon proper application , a substantial devel- opment permit may be granted which is. at variance with the criteria established in the Renton Master Program where , owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property, the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria established in the Renton Master Program would cause undue and unneces- sary hardship or practical difficulties . The fact that the applicant might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the Master Program is not , by itself, sufficient reason for a vari- ance . The Planning Commission must find each of the following : 8 . 02 . 01 Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condi- tions applying to the subject property or to thel in- tended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. 8 . 02 . 02 The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity . i I -7 s- sEp 30 1975 8 . 02 . 03 The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity . 8 . 02 . 04 The variance granted will be in harmony with the gener- al purpose and intent of this Master Program . 8 . 02 . 05 The public welfare and interest will be preserved ; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by deny- ing it , the variance will be denied, hut each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and devel- opment of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent With the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and the provisions of this Master Program. 8 . 03 , Conditional Use Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted . The objective of a condition- al use provision is to provide more control and •flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program . With provisions to control undesirable effects , the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses . Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area . A condition- al use permit will be granted subject to each of the follow- ing conditions : 8 . 03 . 01 The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area . 8 . 03 . 02 The use will not interfere with the public use of pub- lic shorelines . 8 . 03 . 03 Design of the site will be compatible with the surround- ings and the City ' s Master Program. 8 . 03. 04 The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City ' s Master Program . 8 . 04 Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written communi- cation is received by the applicant and the City indicating • otherwise . -75- s& $® 1975 8 . 02 . 03 They variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity . 8 . 02 . 04 The variance granted will be in harmony with the gener- al purpose and intent of this Master Program. 8 . 02 . 05 The public welfare and interest will be, preserved ; ; if more harm will be done to the area by granting thel variance -than would be done to the applicant by deny- • ing it , the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and ldevel- opment of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent With the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and the provisions of this Master Program. 8 . 03 • Conditional Use Upon proper application , a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a condition- j • al use provision is to provide more control and .flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects , the scope of uses can be expanded; to include many uses . Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting I I such performance standards that make the use compatiible with other permitted uses within that area . A condiltion- al use permit will be granted subject to each of the follow- ing conditions : 8 . 03 . 01 The use must be compatible , with other permitted uses within that area . I 803 . 02 The use will not interfere with the public use of ,pub- lic shorelines . 8703. 03 Design of the site will be compatible with the surround- jings and the City' s Master Program. 8L03. 04 The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City ' s Master Program. 8 . 04 Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances shall , be deemed to be approved within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written and the Citycommuni- cationin indicating is received by the applicant dic g I otherwise . iF , -,..,y . 410,,,,J) 1 , Affidavit of Publication _. i STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. I I ''-n92a. 'a...C. fip.ag a. being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that ..She,is the ...chief...c1G.rk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said"newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, I printed ,and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the 1 aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of - the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King 1 County,: , public hearing - amend. 1 Washington.That the annexed is a , ' to shoreline master program as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period ' m RENTON of QM consecutive issues, commencing on the NOTICE o@ PUBLIC HEARING . I RENTON°W7 COUNCIL' _ 4 day of SeptSept► , 19 .... 1..., and ending the •NOTICEIR,HEREBY t ,: ' `t$e Renton.City(§ GEE fixed 'the46thwday of Octobero I,at 8:00 ,! day of , 19 ,both dates ,P M 3inrthe;Council Chambers of the inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its Renton" Municipal Building, •enton, subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Aashingion'as the time and place, for a puublc hearing;to consider the following .:::_ , ° charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 8,46', which LAmendments:tlj lip City's has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words ;S'ti,o rijI)i an j�Yionr o Pug', for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each g r'`a?m R '0QBooOd from ( , subsequent insertion. Any,�and:all:interested aecmo 1 are I� invited to1i present tovoice approv- ° al disapproval • t:p ` CP RENTON Delores11 • A l ay toy \ : chief c DATE PUBLICATION i, (45./............... .. €�x September in 9 � 9 -Published [kill �©O lay Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of wl Record-Chronicle September, Sept. 75 ,s7A4,R3460 ',a ,19 `- In4 I 0 - Q / , Notary Publi f . d for the State of Washington, resid t Renton,King County. 1 •- Passed by the Legislature, 1955,known as Senate Bill 281, effective 'June 9th,1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co.rules for counting words and figures, adopled•b the newspapers of the State. - I 1 J 1 • Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. 'A=' h4, `a C {1TRIzna being first duly sworn on i oath, deposes and says that ..S.120 is the ohie.f...elerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, I ptx' :�-ie hear±ng - amend. - Washington.That the annexed is aU RENTON t NOTICE p�gLIC HEARING to shoreline master program ° X RENTON COUNCIL W . NOTICE`[�.,HEREBY ` as it waspublished in regular issues (and the Renton Ciry Council►� g the 6th day lOctober,;1975,at r • not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period • :R;Mi'�in�the�Cguncil Chambers of,the� enton,Muu i&pal,Building,Renton , ashin toms they of Ono consecutive issues, commencing on the for a public:hen pld0ea' tolldw�n 9 Q7 consider the i2 '' r' Armendments j(gyp s' day of .�E;pt s 19 ......?.... and ending the e > .Stloreali�ne M- � ° c pro •'gram: `� ° (Con4igp�d from'I September'8 1975 day of , 19 ,both dates Any`and all interested persons are' , inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its invrted•tobep sent tovoigeapprov subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee fal dysapp ovalo�opinivoi same'�" .' R r., CIITY o f RENTON charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ `�•rr�4, which Delores A;Mead,I Clerk�, DATEtOF`PUBLICAiTION �� has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words September 1'2 1975, a. , ('or the first insertion and per folio of one hundred wo ds for each �, �i�� subsequent insertion. �Pubhshed" G10G1I�0 (...? ( Record"Chronicle September 12,,r ° s chief clerk, , u �- Subscribed and sworn to before me this'9 day of Sept. i 75 ,',19 / �Q I i rotary Publi i and for the State of Washington, ,' resi n .at Renton,King County. , —Gassed by the/Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th,1955. —Wcstet'n-U iiion Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, aclop1,1 O the newspapers of the State. I I N C THE, CITY OF RENTON ■ rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9P (o AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD Q CITY CLERK O,Q�fFD SE PI September 9, 1975 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 9th day of September, 1975, at the hour of 5:00 P.M. your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, Washington, by first class mail, a Notice of Continued Public Hearing to be held October 6, 1975 thereon, said Notices mailed to list of plan recipients and other interested parties as furnished by the Renton Planning Department-;on the Proposed Master Shoreline Program. • 77itt o Delores A. Mead, City lerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 9th day of September, 1975 cJQi Notary Public in and for the State • of Washington, residing in Renton cc: Gary Kruger '' Mr. Dwight Potter : Mr. John F. Parks tt.u.ts. narsnaii _ The Boeing Company 5227 Ripley Lane N. 2909 Mt. View Ave. Box 3707 - Mail Stop 62- Renton, WA 98055 , ^ Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98124 Mr. James E. Denzer Mr. Bill Collins D. R. Mansfield 3613 Lake Washington Blvd. N. .5301 Ripley Lane N. J. H. Baxter & Co. Renton, WA 98055 , Renton, WA 98055 P. 0. 68 Rento B WA ox 568055 Mr. Bob Kenkman Mr. Dick Houghton Mr. Jack Smith P.O. Box 149 Utilities Engineering 5221 Ripley Lane N. Renton, WA 98055 City Hall Renton, WA 98055 pc- aaki-2 Mrs. Wm. Arthalony " Mr. R. DeBoer Lou Bergen 2332 N.E. 31st St, Stoneway 5029 Ripley Lane N. Renton, WA 98055 P. 0. Box 509 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 - - - - • Mrs. Nina Young Mr. Robert Rauscher Mr. Jon Robinson 2224 N.E. 31st St. Burlington Northern..Railroad 3811 Lake WA Blvd. Renton, WA 98055 , 830 Central; Building Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104 - Miss Isobel Kemmer Mr. Wilks J. Sullivan Mrs. T.C. Buckingham 2415 N.E. 31st St. 623 S.W. 158th St. 5025 Ripley Lane N. Renton, WA 98055 - . Seattle, WA 98166 _ Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Bonnie R. Tabor Mr. Don Cowles Mr. Robert Estyr 3509 S.E. 7th St. . Burlington Northern R.R. The Boeing Co. Renton, WA 98055 830 Central Bldg. : Kent Space Center :. Seattle, WA 98104 • Kent, WA 98031 (rf•.-rr -r .. - !S . -r ( r r -. - . .. . . . jam , , D. O. Norman , - Blanche Karinen P. M. JORDAN P. 0. Box 477 ' " .- . 1205 Shelton Ave. S.E. . 2505 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA; 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. James Hanken Margaret Anderson _ Mr. Robert B.. Martindale 1114 Norton Building - 6827 Ripley Lane N. - 616 Stevens Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Richard York '. Robert K. Butler , Jane Shafer: - 4632 149th S.E. - '. Milwaukee Railroad League of Women Voters Bellevue, WA, 98007 2501 East D 505 N. Central Tacoma, WA, 98421 Kent, WA 98031 , „ - Mr. Henry Jajneson • Elizabeth Rivily Mr. Geo. S. Wenctillk Logan Building I( = 524 Seneca N.W. ; 15708 - 64th N.E. Seattle, WA .�98101 v . Renton, WA. 98055 Bothell , WA 98011 , I-I. L. IlU'f'Jl. rig . iwvci 1,. Ill.,'a1/4.11UI Room 801 -SkinnerBuild', Renton Chamber of CommerrQ ; 664 Sunset Blvd. N.E. 11 Seattle, WA 98101 300 Rainier Ave. N. : Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 . _ -'- ,._. _ - .. ',•,,, ,,.,, , ,,, • Merl E. ;Shaw ' D. Rodney Mack .,, 3107Mt•, View North Shoreline Div, Land Prog. ' Renton, 'WA 98055 = Department of Ecology Olympia, WA 98504 j .. . Mr., Lloyd Lindberg _ Mr. Robert McBeth 3111 Mt. View Ave. N. 1632 Lincoln Court S.E. Renton, WA"98055 Renton, WA 98055 B._ G. Morrison :' Mr. Arthur D. Scholes 3011 Mta View Ave. N. 1708 Ferndale S.E. Renton, WA 98055 : Renton, WA 98055 Mr Charles Guy Sharon Neglay • ' 3101 S.E. 5th St. 656 Lind Ave. N.W. : . Renton, WA98Q55 " Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Dick York;`''` Mr. Alex Cugini , Jr: 2121 - 5th Ave: : 611 Renton Ave. Seattle, WA 98121 Renton, WA 98055 Paul Horn; . . . 27423 220th P1 :- S:E: Mr. William C. 'Goddard y ;' . 3707 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Kent -WA 98031, • Renton, WA 98055 r r r r r:1 ^c. ^;'i: f r r p •, -..,..._-.. , 9-, , - .. , , ,.1,• ,'i'n , i' , ,, ' - - - • III _ ' 6 Herbert of Mr. David L. DeVore Dor by 6928 S. 120th Place ' 3923 N.E. 6th St. : Seattle, WA 98178 Renton, WAi98055 Mr. Gary. Mix Mr. Don Humble Puget Power Building 360 Stevens Ave. S.W. Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA ,98055 Mr:. Tim IOkimura Mr. Robert J. Phelps :' 5642 - 116th Place S.E. :. 3821 Lake Washington Blvd. N. a; ', Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 198055 Mr: Clifton P. Garrison 7 'Mr. Stewart W. �Poppe , 13 - 158th,:Place` N.E. '.• 3713 Talbot Road S., Bellevue, WA p8008 Renton, WA '980$5 . :..•- -.. is' . ...;' :�.4 •1 . f h � 1 �' .. , � •.. 1 . i � a .. .. i .. INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Les Phillips, Public Works' Dept. DATE: September 9, 1975 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing - Shoreline Management Master Program Attached are 15 copies of the above-captioned notice. Please post and return certification of posting to this office. Thanks. CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 6th day of October , 19 75 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : Amendments to the City's Shoreline Master Program. (Continued from September 8, 1975) Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON 4/1„ ,_,} Delores A. Mead , City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION September 12, 1975 Mr. Charles Delaurenti , President Renton City Council Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Community Services Committee Report on the Proposed Shoreline Master Program Dear Mr. Delaurenti : The City of Renton Shoreline Citizens Advisory Committee , was reassembled and recently met to review the changes the ; City Council ' s Community Services Committee has suggested be made in the proposed Shoreline Master Program. We are very concerned about several of these proposed amendments and ask that the majority of these amendments not be adopted. Speci- fically, the Citizens Advisory Committee makes the following recommendations with respect to each proposed amendment. 1. Section 1. 03. 5 : We are not opposed to this amendment' s ' intent as the language is generally taken directly from the Shoreline Management Act. However, we are opposed to the langu- age "and which meets all other requirements" and feel that this opens up the entire act to other, unspecified regulations . -- ! The applicant already is required to meet zoning regulations , , building codes , etc. , and we are uncertain as to what other requirements are intended to be. (Committee vote - passed unam. ) . 2. Section 2 . 02 . 01 : Committee expressed no opinion on , this proposed amendment. 3. Section 4. 08 : Committee recommends that this amend- ment be rejected for the following reasons: a. The Lake Washington Regional Goals and Policies rare already adequately referenced in the Master Program (p. 6-7) and no further reference is necessary. b. We feel that this would diminish local control lover development of our' shorelines by making our regulations sub- ject to something which can be amended or modified by another governmental body. c. We may have, inadvertently , failed to speak to la given problem, and, in such event, the regional goals and policies would control,: - In recommending disapproval of this amendment, we do ask ' that the master program be constantly reviewed by the City Council. This should eliminate any conflict with regional ) t planning. < - �-� • Mr. Charles Delaurenti, President Page Two 4 . Section 5 . 05 . 02B, 5 . 05 . 02D and 5 . 05. 02E : Committee recommends that this amendment be rejected. We feel that this amendment would diminish local control over the future develop- ment of our shorelines . If adopted, these amendments would make these specific uses subject to the conditional use and variance regulations and this would result in final approval being given at DOE. We feel the Planning Commission should make this deter- mination. 5. Section 5 . 05. 02F (2) : Committe recommends adoption. 6 . Section 7. 01. 01B1 : Committee recommends rejection of ' this amendment. Many people utilize seaplanes along Lake Wash- ington and we see no reason to eliminate this practice. 7. Section 7. 01. 02A1 and 7 . 01 . 02A2 : The committee expressed no strong opinion with respect to this amendment and was therefore willing to accept this amendment. 8. Section 7 . 01. 03C (New) : The committee recommends adoption of the first sentence and rejection of the second sentence. We feel that trails in or near airports could cause a safety hazard, and that such uses should be restricted. 9 . Section 7. 04. 01 : The committee recommends that the proposed amendment be rejected and that the following language Ibe adopted in its place : "All bulkheads are subject to the regulations set forth in this master program, except that bulkheads common to a single family residence are exempted from the permit system set forth in this act. " 10. Section 7. 04. 02 : The committee recommends that this amendment be adopted. 11. Section 7. 05 . 01B : The committee is willing to accept this amendment. 12 . Section 7. 05. 02 : The committee recommends that this amendment be rejected. We feel that this is a reasonable power for the Planning Commission to exercise. If the amendment were adopted, an application for variance would have to be filed, re- sulting in a trip to Olympia to secure DOE approval. { ! • Mr. Charles Delaurenti, President Page Ilutu 13. Section 7. 05. 03 : The committee was split on this ; amendment but the majority of the committee recommended that this amendment be rejected. 14. Section 7 . 07. O1C: The committee recommends that this amendment be rejected. There are adequate restrictions in the present form and local control should be maintained. 15. Section 7. 05 . 03 : The committee was split on this amendment but the majority of the committee recommended that this amendment be rejected. 16. Section 7. 08. 01A: Recommend approval, but fell that a specific reference should be made to Section 8. 02 . 01 through 8. 02 . 05 , rather than just to Section 8. 02 . 17. Section 7. 12 . 02C and 7. 12 . 03 (1) (a) : The committee re- commends approval of both amendments but also feels that the title of this section (7. 12 . 03) be changed to "Single Family Private Piers . " 18. Section 7. 12. 06 : The committee recommends rejection of the amendment and adoption of the following amendment: A. The following dock specifications shall be allowed: 1. The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty (20) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty (250) feet. 2. The maximum width shall be twelve (12) feet. 3. If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the waters edge. 4. Docks shall be located no closer than 30 feet to a side property line. B. Commercial and industrial docks' shall be allowed only by Planning Commission approval subject to rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Commission. 19 . Sections 7. 19 . 03A2 and 7. 19 . 03B: The committee recommends approval of both amendments . - 20 . Section 8. 01 : Recommend approval - This merely restates state law. 21. Section 8. 03 : Recommend approval • - Mr. Charles Delaurenti, President Page Four I i 22. Section 8. 04 : Recommend approval but ask that there i be a 45 day time period for the Department of Ecology to act. We sincerely hope that these comments will be taken into consideration when the Council acts on this ordinance. Very • y yours , • • � i RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting September 8, 1975 City Clerk ' s Office REFERRALS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Puget Sound Governmental Conference Regional Development Plan BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Street Vacation requested by Gary Vigoren LEGISLATION COMMITTEE H.J.R. 19 - Assistance to students of public and private schools re Metro bus 1% for Arts Ordinance Amendment to Animal License Ordinance Ordinance re Appropriation of funds for LID Costs Ordinance re Appropriation of funds for HUD Grant LEGISLATIVE AIDE 1% for Arts MAYOR Metro bus routing in Highlands ,Mr. Smith's comments re Metro bus scheduling for St. Anthonys School MAYOR AND CITY CLERK Authorized to execute Metro Park & Ride Agreement !PARK DEPARTMENT Signing of Parks re Mini Bikes POLICE CHIEF Check re mini bikes in Windsor Hills Park PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Street Vacation requested by Gary Vigoren PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ;Dead Bolt Locks TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Parking at Vocational School Street Vacation requested by Gary Vigoren TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Parking in the Vocational School area PU@- TC HEARING Shoreline Master Plan continued to 10/6/75 i I RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting . September 8, 1975 Municipal Building Monday $: 00 P . M. Council Chambers 1 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called 1 the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALLiOF .CHARLES DELAURENTI , Council President; RICHARD M. STREDICKE, EARL CLYMER, COUNCIL KENNETH BRUCE, WILLIAM GRANT. COUNCILMEN GEORGE PERRY and HENRY SCHELLERT ' arrived shortly after Roll Call . 1 g CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; WARREN GONNASON, • IN ATTENDANCE Public Works Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; GWEN • MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; HUGH DARBY, Police i - Chief; GEORGE WILLIAMS, Fire Chief; BOB HUGHES, Legislative bide, DON 1 STARK, Administrative Assistant; VERN CHURCH, Purchasing Agent; VIC � TeGANTVOORT, Street Supt. ; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director. I MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL POSTPONE UNTIL NEXT WEEK, APPROVAL•O.F COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 25, 1975 and SEPTEMBER' 4. CARRIED.` PRESS ATTENDING Eric Pryne, News Editor, Renton Record Chronicle. • PUBLICIHEARING his being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published .ShoreiinelMaster and mailed, Mayor Garrett opened the public hearing to consider amendments Program � to the City's Shoreline Master Program. Letter from Boeing Commercial Amendments Airplane Company reported review of the proposed amendments to the City's 1 Master Program for Shoreline Management and found Sections 7;07.03 and 7. 12.06 unduly restrictive, claiming the 35-ft. limitation on the height of future buildings would be restrictive to aircraft or hydrofoil produc- tion; and that restricting the length of a dock to water depth of 20 feet severely limits future hydrofoil programs as the present naval hydro- foil extends 23 feet below the water surface in the foils-down position ' { ' � while functional testing is performed. The letter also noted concern that any changes would adversely affect the future development of the ,, Renton Plant and asked the two mentioned items be omitted. 1 Letter from Robert McBeth, Chairman of the Renton Shoreline Citizens Advisory Committee noted the committee was reassembled and has reviewed changes the Community Services Committee has suggested and noted para- , graph by paragraph the recommendations of the Advisory Committee, ask- ing that most of the amendments would not be adopted. Letter from Henry C. Jameson, Ferguson & Burdell , Seattle, Law Office representing Quendall Terminals, recalled denial of the Renton Master Shoreline Program by the Department of Ecology and noted review of the. 1 proposed amendments dated 8/13/75 from the Planning Commission. The I letter detailed objections to some of the proposed amendments and noted degree of local control left with the City of Renton as opposed to relin- quishment to the Department of Ecology, as the most important issue. iII Audience Comment: Robert McBeth, 1632 Lincoln Court S.E. , objected to loss of local control and that the Department of Ecology should not have final determination over conditional use or variance applications; also objecting to loss of local control to the Lake Washington Regional Goals and Policies and objecting regarding dock regulations.{ Questions and answering period ensued. It was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY Public Hearing PERRY, COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO OCTOBER 6, 1975.* Caroline Terry, ' Continuedlto 516 Pelly Ave. N. , asked for available material and was advised the 10/6/75 Shoreline Master Plan and amendments were available for review. *MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Clymer, Chairman of Community Services Committee, anounced Thursday meeting at 4:30 p.m. on the Shoreline matter. CORRESPONDENCE Puget Sound Letter from Puget Sound Governmental Conference, Mart Kask, Executive e ,, ental Director, submitted two Interim Regional Development Plan proposals, Conference . noting the work program for revision of the Plan by June, 1976, that a Task Force of officials selected by the four County Subregional Com- Regional Plan mittees is beginning to draft a Purpose Statement to provide focus and I guidance for development of the remainder of the plan. The letter asked 1 ' the matter to be placed on the Council agenda for public deliberation and asked response not later than 9/26/75 directly to the Task Force MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER COMMUNICATION TO r , l Renton City Council 9/8/75 Page 2 CORRESPONDE CE - Continued P.S.G.C. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.* Discussion ensued as to whether or not the Continued City would remain member of the conference, withdrawal of the counties also discussed. Councilman Perry noted advantage of belonging to agency certified to receive federal funds and Mayor Garrett noted danger of the certification being lost to Department of Ecology or State Office of Community Development which would mean loss of local contro.! .*CARRIED. , Metro Park Letter from Mayor Garrett submitted Council of Municipality of Metro- Ride Lot politan Seattle (Metro) agreement for Park and Ride Lot located between Burnett P1 . S. and Burnett Ave. S. on the north side of S.2nd St. , indefinite term lease having been obtained by Metro with Burlington Northern for former right-of-way property. The letter noted Metro to pay costs of leasing and to furnish materials for the construction, . with the City providing all of the labor involved in the construction. The letter requested authority for the Mayor and City. Clerk tolexecute the agreement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCILAUTHOR- IZE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT.* Public Works Director Gonnason noted Project Cost completion of the facility was planned within two years and noted public ° $15,000 hearings would be scheduled for final selection, that the Planning and Public Works Departments have been involved. *MOTION CARRIED. Metro Bus Letter from Mrs. Joan Frank, 475 Kirkland Ave. N.E. and Mrs. Eloyce Routing Sumpter, 3008 N.E. 5th P1 . , enclosed copy of letter regarding problems with the Metro buses in the Renton Highlands. The letter listed steps taken to bring attention to the problem caused by 31 buses passing their homes each day and attempt for a route change, asking Council consideration concerning this problem. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COMMUNICATION BE _REFERRED TO METRO REPRESENTATIVE (MAYOR) TO REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.*Discussion ensued regarding routing of the Metro buses to Bellevue Community College and Catholic School in Renton. *MOTION CARRIED. (See later - Audience Comments) Bid Opening City Clerk Mead reported August 26, Bid Opening for asphalt overlay Asphalt Overlay on N.E. 1Gth and 12th Streets and Renton Hill ; three bidders reported NE 10th & 1 ,th as shown on the attached tabulation. Public Works Committee report Bid Award was presented by Chairman Bruce concurring in the recommendation of the • Public Works Department to award the contract for asphalt overlay to the low bidder, Watson Asphalt Paving Co. , Inc. of Redmond, in the amount of $56,350; also requesting authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute -the contract. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND AWARD BID. CARRIED. . Bid Openin9 City Clerk Mead reported September 3, 1975 Bid Opening for surplus Surplus Traffic communication and traffic control equipment with four bidders respond- Equipment ing as shown on the attached tabulation. Letter from Purchasing Agent Bid Award Church, having reviewed bids with Traffic Engineer. Hamlin, recommended acceptance of two of the bids: Electric Controls , Inc. for $2,420 and City of Mount Vernon for $234, both subject to State sales tax of D53% and/or a resale tax number. The letter further recommended that the City reject the bids from Enerco, Inc. for $100 and the bid from • David T. Mitchell for $235, and further that the Purchasing Agent be given the authorization to sell the rejected items and the ones on which we received no bids. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PURCHASING AGENT.* Upon inquiry, Purchasing Agent Church noted majority of equipment from the downtown area which was replaced. *CARRIED. Dead Bolt Locks Letter from Linda D. Orr and Gary P. Slattery,. Royal Hills Apartments , asked legislative assistance enabling use of dead bolt locks as a means of protection of self and property and making it impossible for apart- ment managers to forbid.the use of dead bolt locks. The letter referred . to the Seattle Code which specifies rental managers provide these locks • and also noted rejection by insurance agents due to being in a high risk area. The letter further noted dead bolt locks are advocated by the Renton Police Department. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COMMUNICATION BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE.* Public Works Director Gonnason noted apartment manager would not allow as they could not gain access and the insurance companies won't insure against theft without these dead bolt locks. *MOTION CARRIED. i ,,,,,„,„„,,,, ),„,„...„,„,„, /..._ _ ,. _ ._., . _ , ,, . ____ ... �OEI G COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY f s_. P.O. Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124 A Division of The Boeing Company i . ; September 2, 1975 } . R-6180-599 The Honorable Avery Garrett Mayor, City of Renton _ Renton, Washington 98055 . : 1 - Subject: Shoreline Master Program Dear Mayor Garrett: 0 , We have reviewed the recently proposed amendments to the City's Master Program for Shoreline Management and two of these amendments are of concern to us. These " proposed amendments are: i Section 7.07.03 (New) . 'An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five (35) feet high.' Section 7. 12.06 (Commercial and Industrial Docks) "The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty (20) feet is reached, provided the length does not exceed two-hundred fifty (250) feet.' ' It is felt that these two amendments are unduly restrictive, considering the nature of our business, and our product mix. The thirty-five foot limitation on the height of future buildings would be restrictive to aircraft or hydrofoil production. Resticting the length of a dock to water depth of twenty feet, is severely limiting to future hydrofoil programs, as the foils of the present naval hydrofoil extend twenty-three feet below the water surface in the foils-down position while functional testing is performed. Recent court cases have indicated that property continguous to property within the jurisdiction of a Shoreline's Management Master Program may also come within the jurisdiction of the program. Within this context, it may be interpreted that the entire Boeing Renton Plant could come within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Renton, even though a large portion of the plant property is not located within the 200 foot Shoreline zone . We are concerned with any changes in the Renton Master Program which could adversely effect the future development of the Renton Plant. 3 . i • The Honorable Avery Garrett -2- R6180-599 • We realize that the variance and conditional-use process may be used in specific circumstances. However, variances and conditional-use permits require the approval of the State Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office, which could cause, costly delays. It is our recommendation that Section 7.07.03 which establishes a limit on the height of an industrial building be omitted, and that the depth restriction of Section 7. 12.06.1 be omitted. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. _ Very truly yours, 707/727/737 'DIVISION ."/ /J . D. Bixby Director of Facilities cc: City Council Members Kenneth D. Bruce Lail Clymer Charles J. Delaurenti William J. Grant George J. Perry •, Henry E. Schellert Richard M. Stredicke Boeing R. G. Johnston J. R. Potter 1,1 /75-277-77,7",7,-V7t,-V7/7 31! / I C C L\ er\C l BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE.COMPANY P.O. Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124 A Division of The Boeing Company September 2, 1975 R-6180-599 The Honorable Avery Garrettff- -�� Mayor, City of Renton 'j' r i,, • �'`�� : rs . ra Renton, Washington 98055 H a t,o Subject: Shoreline Master Program Dear Mayor Garrett: . We have reviewed the recently proposed amendments to the City's Master Program for Shoreline Management and two of these amendments are of concern to us. These proposed amendments are: Section 7.07.03 (New) "An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five (35) feet high." ( Section 7.12.06 (Commercial and Industrial Docks) "The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty (20) feet is reached, provided the length does not exceed two-hundred fifty (250) feet." It is felt that these two amendments are unduly restrictive, considering the nature of our business, and our product mix. The thirty-five foot limitation on the height of future buildings would be restrictive to aircraft or hydrofoil production. Resticting the length of a dock to water depth of twenty-feet,• is severely limiting to future hydrofoil programs, as the foils of the present naval hydrofoil extend twenty-three feet below the water surface in the foils-down position while functional testing is, performed. Recent court cases have indicated that property continguous to property within the jurisdiction of a Shoreline's Management Master Program may also come within the jurisdiction of the program. Within this context, it may be interpreted that the entire Boeing Renton Plant could come within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Renton, even though a large portion of the plant property is not located within the 200 foot Shoreline zone. We are concerned with any changes in the Renton Master Program which could adversely effect the future development of the Renton Plant. loie''o/..0: t r• • The Honorable Avery Garrett -2- R-6180-599 We realize that the variance and conditional-use process may be used in specific circumstances. However, variances and conditional-use permits require the approval of the State Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office, which could cause costly delays. It is our recommendation that Section 7.07.03 which establishes a limit on the height of an industrial building be omitted, and that the depth restriction of Section 7.12.06.1 be omitted. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very truly yours, 707/727/737 DIVISION J`. D.`Bixby director of Facilities cc: City Council Members Kenneth D. Bruce Earl Clymer Charles J. Delaurenti William J. Grant George J. Perry Henry E. Schellert Richard M. Stredicke Boeing R. G. Johnston J. R. Potter Gordon Ericksen Gary Kruger /2///71 Y1 f I , LAW OFFICES OF Ferguson �� burdell WM.H FERGUSON E-.P.SWAIN,JR. S, _ CHARLES S.BURDELL(1973) 1700 PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK BUILDING OF COUNSEL WM.WESSELHOEFT • DONALD MCA..DAVIDSON Sed!I!e,\Voshinglon 98171 JAMES E.HURT EDWARD HILPERT,JR. WILLIAM D.STITES THOMAS J.GREENAN (206)622-1711 • BRUCE P.BABBITT HENRY W.DEAN JAMES P.MGGOWAN WILLIAM B.MOORE JOHN MiWOODLEY C.DAVID SHEPPARD CHRISTOPHER KANE W.J.THOMAS FERGUSON HENRY C.JAMESON • August 29 , 1975 • Councilman Earl Clymer - • Renton City Council • Municipal Building . . 200 Mill Ave. South . Renton, WA 98055 Re: Shoreline Master Program As Amended Dear Mr. Clymer: • This office represents Quendall Terminals , a joint venture which is located within the city limits of the City of Renton. In addition, we have performed legal work in the past for the Renton property owners committee which was formed at the time of the initial con- sideration of the Shoreline Master Program by the citizens committee and the city council. I have been requested by Mr. Donald O. Norman, manager of Quendall Terminals, to forward to you certain prelimi- nary comments concerning the numerous amendments to the master program which have recently been promulgated. Of central concern to the city, of course, are the three areas which the Department of Ecology singled out on September 5, 1974 , in a letter to the Honorable Avery Garett. This, letter constituted the denial by the Department of Ecology of the master program submitted by Renton. I have compared the Department' s letter of September 5 ,. . 1974 , with the proposed amendment to the Shoreline Master Program dated August 13, 1975 , from the Planning Commission. Certain of. the proposed amendments actually are beneficial to the master prog- ram by -clarifying it and making needed changes . Other amendments, however, represent fairly substantial departures from the initial ?\ document. . In its letter of September 5, 1974, the Department of Ecology ob- jected to Section 7. 12. 03C of the master program as submitted. As you will recall, this section permitted docks up to 150 ft. in length and authorized the Planning Commission to allow docks of grc t. r lcr.yth. The Department of L._. ology recommended 1:Cyu1ui:10I]S to allow a variation in permitted dock lengths based on specific . • I Councilman Early Clymer . August 29, 1975 Page Two needs of the development proposal and the site involved. The pro- posed amendments to the master program dated. August 13, 1975 , Igo far beyond the recommendations of the Department of Ecology. ;For example, Section 7. 12.06 has been amended in its entirety. As drafted, that section provided that commercial and industrial !docks Y- . would be allowed only by the Planning Commission subject to the rules `and 1regulations adopted by the Planning Commission. . . The amendments on the other hand provided very specific standards governing docks for commercial and industrial uses. There is nothing inherently improper about setting specific standards for industrial and commercial docks. However, amended Section 7.12 .06 presents fairly serious constitutional problems for the City of . Renton. For example, Section 7.12 .06B provides that docks must be placed within the inner harbor line. This is a flat prohibition - against construction of. docks in platted harbor areas of the City of Renton. In Harris v. Hylebos Industries, Inc. , 81 Wn. 2d 770 (1973) , the Washington State Supreme Court concluded that the policy of ' the Washington State Legislature encouraging the proper develop- ment and use of harbor areas had not been changed by the Shoreline Management Act. While the permit procedure under SMA must be' com- pl}ed with, there is nothing in SMA ,indicating a change in the legislative policy of treating platted shorelands and tidelands in city harbor areas as suitable for the purposes of commercial and industrial use. In its decision, the Supreme Court reviewed the background of the legislative policy and cited decisions supporting a legislative policy of encouraging the use of platted harbor1areas . A flat prohibition against the use of such harbor areas, as is con- tained in Section 7.12. 06B, puts the City of Renton in direct! (\conflict with the Department of Natural Resources , which is charged with supervising such areas. Moreover, such a flat prohibition is simply an invitation for a lawsuit against the City of Renton based on passage of an ordinance in an area pre-empted by state law;. Certainly, there is nothing in the letter of September 5 , 197�4 , y- from the State Department of Ecology which requires such an approach to' be taken by the City of Renton. Nor is there anything in the September 5 letter requiring that the construction of docks be allowed only as a .conditional use or that docks be constructed para- llel to the water' s edge. . Yet these provisions have been incorpo- rated in the amendments to Subsection 7. 12 .06. The September 5, 1974, letter from the Department of Ecology !also expressed concern with the numerous provisionsof the Renton Act granting descretion to the Planning Commission to allow variations from master program requirements . The Department of Ecology ,rec- ommended that these provisions be abolished and that such varia- ! . 1 Councilman Earl Clymer . . . August 29 , 1975 Page Three . tions be allowed only through variances or conditional use permits. To accede to such a demand would in effect strip Renton of any; local discretion and leave all decisions with regard to the master program in the hands of the Department of Ecology. I do not be- lieve that this is required under the law. •'program ram shall contain RCW 90: 58.100 (5) provides that each- masterp g provisions to allow for the varying of the application of use .' • regulations of the program, including' provisions for permits for conditional uses and variances, to insure ,that strict implementation ofja. program will not create unnecessary hardships. The language ofIthe statute does not require that all variations from the terms of the 'program be handled by conditional use or variance procedures . The statute does require that all such variations be allowed only Kinithe event of extraordinary circumstances when the public in- terest will not suffer any substantial detriment. I believe that the principal, determination of extraordinary circumstances and detri- ment to the public interest should be made by the City of Renton, which is closest 'to the problem. Under the amendments as drafted, . the Department of Ecology would reign supreme and government employees in, Olympia would decide matters with which they would have no; familiarity or, necessarily, concern. If you will recall, one of the reasons for the enactment of the present Shoreline Management provisions was to insure to the local body some. degree of conitrol . over the administration of Shoreline Master Programs. There is, probably, cause for concern in placing unbridled d• iscretion with the Planning Commission in allowing variations from the terms . ' of the master program. However, this problem can be solved idly adding ajshort paragraph to the master program setting forth standards to guide the Planning Commission in its decisions allowing variations. These standards ,would, of necessity, require that variations1be Xiallowed only in extraordinary circumstances where the public interest, would suffer no substantial detriment. Additional -procedural safe- - . . guards can be written into the master program governing the opera- tions of the Planning Commission. This procedure would prevent subsequent lawsuits by disgruntled developers who could conceivably • claim that actions by the Planning Commission were arbitraryand . capricious: If such standards are incorporated in the ordinance, then the objection of the Department of Ecology should be substantially met. If the Department insists on having the final word with regard to any variation from the terms of the master program, it should be opposed. There is no support for this proposition either in; 'the Shoreline Management Act or the guidelines promulgated thereunder. Simply put, the issue is one of local control. 1 I , 1 1 Councilman Earl Clymer August 29, 1975 . Page Four The final basis upon which the Renton Master Program was dis- approved relates to regulations on land fills . Specifically, the Department of Ecology. was concerned with Section 7. 08. O1A concern- ing landfills for residential purposes . It may very well be ' that • the initial draft of the master program permitted an undesirably liberal approach in allowing• residential land fills. However, the Department of Ecology is simply wrong in stating that WAC 173-16- 060 (14) -(D) disallows fills for residential purposes . In fact, . that section simply states that priority should be given to land fills for water dependent and public uses. The section further lists specific factors to be considered in evaluating proposed land fills. The city may therefore permit residential land fill if the factors listed in WAC 173-16-060 are considered prior to Planning . Commission approval for the land fill. Again, the issue with, re- gard to residential land fills is not whether they should be allowed / or disallowed. The issue is whether the decision shall be made in Renton or in Olympia, and whether an individual landowner must spend exorbitant amounts of money and time while the Department of Ecology vacillates . • The above items are the only basis for denial of Renton' s Master Program by the Department of Ecology. However, the proposed amend- ments to the master program impact on a number of other areas . Some of these proposed amendments , frankly, make no sense. For example, Section 7 . 05 . 03 and 7 . 07 . 03 purport to limit the height of commercial and industrial buildings to 35 feet. RCW 90 . 58. 320 states as follows : . "No permit shall be issued pursuant to this chapter for any new or expanded building or structure of - more than 35 ft. above average grade level on shore- lands of the state that will obstruct the view of • a substantial number of residences on area. adjoining such shorelines except where a master program does not prohibit the same and then only when overriding considerations of the public interest will be served. " ' . This section of the Shoreline Management Act does not require 'an absolute prohibition of buildings over 35 feet. Moreover, such a flat prohibition carries with it serious implications . In Merkel 2( v., Port of Brownsville, 8 Wn.App. 884 (1973) , the Washington Court of Appeals held that a single project having interrelated effects • on both uplands and shorelands cannot be divided into segments for the purposes of complying with the provisions of the Shoreline . Management Act. Accordingly, a large commercial or industrial development which contains some shoreline area must comply with the provisions of the Shoreline Master Program. It makes no , sense . III Councilman Earl Clymer August 29 , 1975 Page Five to limit all buildings in such a development to a height of 35 feet. There is certainly no basis for such a limitation if, for example, a building in excess of 35 feet is to be constructed well away from the shoreline on upland property. Moreover, it is difficult to imagine any industrial building being erected to Xa height of 35 feet or less. In effect, the flat prohibition con- tained in the amendments to the Shoreline Management Act would preclude industrial uses on shorelands. This would have serious impacts on the City of Renton, which is highly industrialized. The amendment to Section 7. 05 . 02 of the original Shoreline Master Program presents similar problems. The amendment now proposes to strip the Planning Commission of any power to waive the 25 foot set back requirement. This type of provision is inconsistent with other provisions of the master program. For example, marinas are • a specifically allowed use under the master program. However, if , all commercial buildings must be set back 25 . feet from the water' s edge, it is difficult to imagine how any refueling facilities could ever be allowed at a marina. There are other areas of concern with regard to the proposed amend- ments to the Renton Master Program. However, space does not allow further elaboration. Perhaps the most important issue of all with X2regard to the proposed amendments concerns the degree of local control to be left with the City of Renton. The Department of Ecology cannot properly demand that the City of Renton relinquish all local control to the Department of Ecology. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours , FERGUSON & BURDELL / By . Henry C. Jameson HCJ:mak cc: Mr. Gerard M. Shellan 1 . " R _. . CITY OF RENTON , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • . BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City 'CoUncil has fixed the 8th , day of September '► •''19 '75 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal ' . Building , Renton ,. Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : . Amendments to the City's Shoreline Master Program. . . • • Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , C ty Clerk • DATE OF PUBLICATION • . • 8/22/75 • CERTIFICATION . • STATE OF WASHINGTON) i ) ss . COUNTY OF KING ) ' °Twelve. )2 I , L - s) l . L . Phi ) 11 s hereby certify that t O copies of the above notice were posted by me in T'jelYt_t-Im ee conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City Mupicipal Building , Renton , Washington on date of Augdst 25 , 19 27s- •I _ Signed iA �-z,...,� ATTEST : ' - , )7 . . ' Notary P.Ublic in and for the State of Washington , residing at Renton. \\ . . . •s, V —'tees' p 4-15k.":1( Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON , COUNTY OF KING ss. Barbara Campagna being first duly sworn on oath, deposes.and says that ShCis the Cha cf clerk of • THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of _ the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, . Washington.That the annexed is a Pub. hearing Amendments to cityts shoreline pastor program . • as it was published in regular issues (and • not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period —-- of one consecutive issues, commencing on the ' °NOTICE CO PUBLIC HEARING t-.'.1)f.-"r 7 �i RENTON CITYQCO(i 1CII'. t'i 22 day of n'Ur?'• 19 75 , and ending the NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thaf_ the Renton City'Council.hasafixeii` the 8th day,of Septemfier;'1975,at day of 19 both dates 8:00 P.M.in the Councirchailibers,J inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its of the Renton Muiaicipal_Building,,' subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Renton,Washington asthedime and? ' place for a public hearing to;consider,• the following: r i -,,,,,icharged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 8°F�il, which Amendments to tfie:�City's has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words Shoreline Master Piogzarn`.. ", I Any and all•interested°pepbrisq1 for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each are invited to be present to;voice, subsequent insertion. • approval,disapprov4Coropinionsori, Wk�i.... 4P.c.� ,.�c ®' same.• ��Delo esRAfVl O d j Cle• :,.a.--:•e y ilke cliff CZE3'IC V D aleit.. , .o•f:13 u.b&L;iac`a,ti o+n_1 i ie LL4Ittainy0`s;i Subscribed and sworn to before me.this 22 day of Aug° ,19 75 a-1,1"2-C.A......_C)t)-v,„_9..{ Nota blic in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton,King County. -Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th,1955. -Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. .3;arbor&. Caripa=;na being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that $ �'ts the C�� ' ClErk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That , said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more; than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Recod-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County,in which it is published, to-wit, King County, , Wasl ington.That the annexed is a Pu' • hearing AUt fdD1(:°fts to city*s shoreline io pro;rain - - -- -- __ -- as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period _ I e' of V consecutive issues, commencing on the NOTICE RENTON F '.EE OF PUBLIC HHEARIN 4 ,4 t+�� CJ�7 day of r�'k;;• 19 7 , and ending the :, ;:78:::::TiO:4:i,TY COUNCILNE I REBY OIVENtat rs `' on �;.�. tCouacih,has{ ]day of , 19 both dates otember,inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its nou"�`ncij Ch � subs�Fribers during all of saidperiod.That the full amount of the fee of theRenton ° Renton,Washing o��c7 pal:Building, fJ•� thefolo�wirip ��heanngtoconsider charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ which :ir g ns= t a has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words Amendments; the °a'` CMg for the first insertion and - per folio of one hundred wo for each `%%.PShoreline Master Program •, areAn �ted'°to II mterestedpersons subs quent insertion. L 'present+to . / 4,sam6.e4*i d` vvalor opinions az , . gi... errs�. o : OF RE NON 4 _ NJTLQN 1 22 _j. `:LLB Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Aug. -- ,19 . ,75 1 ' 0-1-1,:_c_e__ 0-Y1,94 i Notary ub is in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton,King County. —Pased by the Legislature, 1955,known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th,1955. ll • —W4stern Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adbpted by the newspapers of the State. I Renton City Council `=♦ 8/18/75 - Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS - Continued ' LID 288 Letter from Finance Director Marshall reported August 15, 1975, bid Whitman Ct.N.E. opening for informal bids on interim financing for L. I .D. No. 288 Interim Financing for $111 ,250 with lowestedinterest rate of 5.49°% received from Peoples National Bank. Other bids were noted: 5. 50% from Rainier Bank and 6.50% from Seattle First National Bank. The Finance Director recommended acceptance of the low bid of Peoples NationalSBank. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AND ACCEPT THE BID OF PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK. CARRIED. Appeal #800507 Notice of Appeal was fired with Superior Court of King County and COPY LID 286, by with the Renton City Clerk by Douglas R. Hartwich, attorney for Appel- R.A. Fawcett lants, Robert A. and Clarissa M. aFawcett regarding City assessment for L. I .D. 286, sanitary sewers in the Kennydale area, claiming no benefit to property. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE CITY ATTORNEY . CARRIED. Claim for Damages Claim for Damages was filed by Daniel Charles Baptist, -1220 S. Holgate, D. C. Baptist Seattle, in the sum of $50,000 for alleged unlawful arrest on 4/18/75. Summons and Complaint was filed With Superior Court of King County by Summons & attorney for Phillip A. Schmolke and Jacqueline M. Schmolke, aka Jacque- Complaint #800336 line M. Russo vs. City in amount of $35,000 for a traffic accident, P.A. Schmolke claim having been filed 4/7/75 and a second claim for damages in the amount of $150,000 and other benefits for complain arising in accord- ance with RCW 35. 31 . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY , COUNCIL REFER THESE TWO CLAIMS TO THE LEGAL OFFICE AND INSURANCE CARRIER. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENTS Letter from Mayor Garrett announced reappointment to the Renton Board Board of of Adjustment of Felix A. Campanella, 226 Seneca Ave. N.W., to position Adjustment No. 1 , and of John P. Qualls , 17804 98th Ave. S. , to position No. 2, F.A. Campanella terms expiring September 6, 1979. The letter requested residency J.P. Qualls requirement be waived for Mr. Qualls as he resides just outside the City limits. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR INCLUDING WAIVING OF THE RESIDENCY REQUIRE- " MENT. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS egislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report Legislation .Com. recommending that a public hearing be set for September 8, 1975tfor Report adoption of the City' s Shoreline•Master Program as amended. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND Shoreline Master SET DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR AMENDMENTS TO SHORELINE MASTER PLAN . Program 'Councilman Stredicke noted the Shoreline Master Program had been Amendments adopted by Council following 'Citizen' s Advisory Committee recommenda- Public Hearing tions and Public Hearing before the Council , that the Department of 9/8/75 Ecology has not adopted the City..'s plan and has suggested changes , therefore a Public Hearing requested. Planning Director Ericksen noted changes in the plan would be explained at the public hearing. Councilman Perry noted the matter of local control was important issue. MOTION CARRIED. Finance & Personnel Com. Finance & Personnel Committee report recommended that the Council Report concur in the Mayor' s appointment of Mr. Donald Doubles to the Renton Police Civil Police Civil Service Commission. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY Service Com. - STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. Upon inquiry D. Doubles by Councilman Bruce, Mayor Garrett noted Mr. Doubles has been resident of the City for three years. MOTION CARRIED. Public Works Public Works Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report con- Committee Rpt. curring in the Public Works Department recommendation to accepti the low bid submitted by Associated Sand and Gravel Co. , Inc. of Tukwila, Bid Award ' in the amount of $6,974 for street overlay of Mill Ave. S. and S. 2nd Street Overlay as shown in attached bid tabulation and in earlier bid opening. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDA- TION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND ACCEPT LOW BID, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CONTRACT. Upon inquiry by 'Council- man Stredicke re extent of widening of Mill Ave. S. , Councilman, Grant noted 3 ft. widening. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Clymer noted the City's Boccie Champions, Councilman Delaurenti and Councilman Perry. ' LEGISLATION COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 18 , 1975 The Legislation Committee recommends that a public hearing be set for September 8 , 1975 on adopting the City 's Shoreline Master Program as amended. 1 , ' Chairman Earl ~Clr Get) e er ry Henry E. Schellert EC:mg . . CITY OF RENTON r. . .. , •. ... . ,__..........„....„............ f .,... •,.,,...,.. - ... .,, :-.4.v "4,1. • -• • ----: - -_--- :1•, ...------.......—... OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i . F- . .. , . - • .:Ptvl , ._-- 200 Mill Avenue South . •.. -. tr.:: •:.-1 1-.- _ -----7"' = ---- -:•' - --,, ---' • "• - Renton, Washington 98055 T./ _,., ...4,.;. .e.., ,; „ .. •'.?%-: k .. • .. - . -. .;„:„. •2-:\....29 7 t• di --- ,'-'.._,P -4-* I, ,,:-.... . •'..--._ -.....-..,?...- '10-Jai) ::: ' g -•14 • . ict_ttg T EP a . . • • „ . ., , . , . _ , . , . .. , •'154 P Mr. Henry Jan,son PLE.4,q- ... • ,... . , P l fi, ..7 fratli,, Seattle, WA 98101 , . ,Zip,,,, ...! oa address /ludic,) til di left 11° rtiber ...it Move ItinV da / _74-1---Fript lorar , vg vim-- - . n-wct sfl? •''''-- 1ET UR N o e -c..---..t-L. loss ...?,, -..... .. , • . • • Si6i TO „ • _ 1..: 4.'4 d cli • • . ' — - -1 ° ., :•,.•:11 7.1.72 .c-, . • WR ITER - ;.., _ ,..,.,• 4.,••• •••••• ._ _ : . .......1..;.. ..• . .— - . , . . . . . . , . . CITY OF RENTON • • -:-••• $:::7,,--, I OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Ire -P NA -- w.c-- . 200 Mill Avenue South . ; - ,,, -..- -,.,,. - IITV °Mg-, ..- ...tli. . • Th&v. 6 Renton, Washington 98055 - -,. ..1, i . .'ii. .8:.--, 9 .-4,F.:- ,:zi A.,.. -4.'17.--REfoo, ..,, , • . . ''''. . -PL..4bc1P 1 c._ . s 8E-,E. 04-Jaz 10 - 1:: on/ , rm METER • oi /WON* - ' CU 38591-5 _ .. . . x ,. ,rfjuiP .: Rento , 98055 , . . • )(, N _ , - _, • . • • . . • ,rgArs, SEii fri c'''' -'------------..--—.,.........--• CITY OF RENTON AZ? 0 -PM OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK A1 I''-cricL... -1200 Mill Avenue South AMAMI TO IDENTY( tqir: Menton, Washington 98055 , PLEASE GIVE ROOM Qg - L 19 7 AUG1 .;ki_SUITAE UMBER 0 Moved, left Pb atTcW4s Mr. Henry Jameson - 0 No such nurnOeV Logan Building 0 ved, not forwardabl% Seattle, Wa. 98101 ddressee. unkridWii . "tie - . ri jj els" „--vi-/ :z.'z si.61.(e- , - _. ,„;,,;.,-..,.:4,, ,.;,--• t/ / Ifi Li-/ jot. , _ 70 . . . . CITY OF P-ENTON . _ OFFICE 04i THE CITY CLERK , 200. MiJA Avenue South . Q" Rent0, Washington 98055 . AUG19'75 l'f,rti:,4,i1p1;..... .. i 1 n . i.. . . iv >41;MVACMI--: 1 U • :' .,' ;', . 3Its 8T9E1 R5 [ . .i. C.' PL,%- 0, , / Mr. Robert Bi4nol 1308 Thomas/iane-Apt 107 Yii ' ,-VETyp, Renton, /Wai: 98055 NOT .• ; ( C% ' . , AS AD„ ,ipLe 1. -1E0-- „ ,. . . , UNABLE, T, N-0 FOR wArto . . /9 fr---- . /I- . . . - . _, CITY OF RENT _i,_ • OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK , - c'• -PM :.. 1 -; 19 auc cl , ...-.., ,,, : • . 200 Mill Avenue South - -— Renton, Washington 98055 • • r /9 7 . - • - -tp, i UGI- *g" • .. i •. -:, • ' . _ • - O . --AMU . ' . __„../;4 • , , k 701 . ...71'1 • ") 6, 1 , . _,.. ..iii:.ty, • : H. . .. U , . R. _Burs 1 • , - ,`. .....,.___ Mi lwauk-- Railroad '17 k ,Rm. 6 ,. * White-Henry Stewart 81°6' le, Wa. 98101 . . , . . . . loVi-..0, LEFT NO,i'.....,;;, ,L- M V. 0 ED, NOT FORWARDABLE - ADDRESSEE- UNKNOWN 8 . • : TUN R - -4' --— .:(z ;1.61-4' / N.0 SUCH NUMBER , ?PRISED . P [WRITER IF , oz,, -sa .ty3s • . . • ,, . . • R faati, ,.� OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEYS RENTON,WASHINGTON " 2 y p oS'. 'Q.$�. POST OFFICE BOX 026, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 96055 255-8678 /.0 CO. o e�� GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY , ��t b SEPI- August 19 , 1975 • ?' r. Cary Kruger, Associate Planner Renton City Hall . Renton, 'Washington 98055 Re: Shoreline Master Program, as Amended Dear Gary: This is a f ollo.eup to our discussion at the Legislation Committee Meeting . on ':o- day, August 18., 1975 , regarding the above captioned. matter. '.,To would suggest that some contact be made with the Department of -c, ' �(7^ establishment r��,,ardi�l the o : a satisfactory procedure if they insist that variances and congtional uses be first —._. submitted to said department for approal or disapproval :in order to cut down further delays to the applicant. WAG 173-16-070 does riot prrovie for any such time limitation and it would seam - that a eyiod of 30 to 45 days should be entirely adequate for the department to act. ' As you know, the law itself, namely RCT,T 90. 5A. 100 (5) does not I F ' eapproval depart ant but stipulates r,ro�%ic_�� :-1'),_ ,��,_ prior of the • that each Easter Grogram shall contain provisions wallow for the varying of the . p licet_on use ree z�ti ns program y i1 r7 ? I r i of -�^� � �� of the program including provisions for Permits for conditional uses] and variances '�v�'n unnecessaryhardships . iil O?�_1?2" i;0- prevent .0 +^ie nay have a s1t?iclt1Of that after tee stipel-ated Period of 83 days his lapsed, after t e initial ap-C3.?_•.^_ ;'io , the state agency de_teri_li ues that a variance or conditional use permit is required. , In that case the thole process may repeat itself, time wise,_, and l y !')eli ee that thiswould '"De a disservice ton :y:? 3�'.r_{)Li..i.. _ 1� ��1Jll.l �i_ applicant W:1o5 2 request for variance or ro_ gitionai use permit r'ay only require a very slight or incoasaTl ntial deviation from the established r%1'ydeli_nes and policies. „e believe that this should 1 } n'r /�•'il1 a local level basis since our o:"rn staff , ' tte �t:e i e the .factual circumistaneesi'. sho�ll+1 be in a �:�� ,;- position to dL �r._1, than somebody on a state level who is not familiar with the land and the physical circumstances involved. , Possibly some process ' ' could be worked out so that only substantial deviations , subject • to a conditional use permit :or .variance, should require the prior :itten approval ofthe Department of Ecology. We: feel this is a matter that should be pursued since theCity has anrimp°ortant . obligation to its applicants to act promptly and in an expeditious manner and to reduce the various time conssming steps that now seem to be encumbent . upon the permit process. • You sight also want to re-examine subsection F of Section ' 7-06-C1 , (Lan I f2'iil) which is to be deleted from our program as per the • am•:.:..dment. I ?o not believe that subsection would do any -cialence to ..•. .e Act itself as long as it is handled by means of a conditional use er-sit or variance in elztreme hardship cases as set ,forth in the uidines and .::ts teat .of :the original Act. This might be ••prLer<able. to c:eletisZ g subsection F in its entirety. Do :±_ and.r,tanc? that the proposed anendment would eliminate . all toy - t er a ur,iv��.t: residential owner to Have a private seaplane. - on -_is l)_. ,:r:iSed as sat forth in Section ! ;.)l..O! , I. 1s this _-n t;'.;'.:j:ec so apply o:'.._"r proseacim v21y or also metro act?ve.i Y 1 t.__i:d til ls issue ., . o:__d be resolvecI. before any final adoption aud �,;71 { ::'!:(.,e _ ,,Y.�=d c.e -.r-: 7,.e ;� �'� t:� .._._��r ��_•_- ,. _ r a +Y1V3te.LJ' GC � d • e: 7 i > c: :r i'rr r ; i-.he t`ri ro 3 c3i♦Lc :70:_...... ); . - t:'..._ 'C^� _ ';.sent. • • .tJ :_ _l ?C)1.1 also :.._Tri3"_ ,_.'_ti. reason O= deletion of:. Section .1.;1j .'✓7 { ., - ,-,ss.s _ rr is rsstss reIstedszid theresiS act.._`,s <.Llsa? - --e water§ :. ;se. 1_ it is _.;,!_ _' '. ., there s'-ssule ;;e ._')a :i..,,::i. ._-i= ...._.--_ ---_.i _.::! preparation to the ssIblic aear'in..s, to 't-.;sti.- r s1-'.C_. ., ___ ..:Laoa. . '•' o ,Yod3 - .� ^� �'r.._ { • 7 � ) re r t�f__ .!.:_.C�'._ ',.'O�.'__ __.r... __ r.. _`lt'!:: �_Li �,._CL�_�,,. L .,. '_IJ �� �..:�_=_i).? "-is' :C'_ .,. tiii_e t"- Jo' _ is ,:o he parallel to tie waters P_dt;e" . _ r would p'='_:-,ss:'t. th _ - r .;i` -ing fsasiblo md would s:2gp;ost • tFi= Lao term "r�)raC:_ _tal" 'se surlst?t: .Lied. It S eeao that most do'_..:s , as a _._<..__C%?-_ r ct ical nec•_.; 1C rJ ;would have to ;(2 cc'istruo±_ -1i ;,n _p,snd'_c'_llar o t'_.' :�7zcs -�'1s '"'e in order to. <.c!'?ie e t .-'. ...acossaty 7'_3Jt_1 soa co s7 !s:t its ttT ose. , -- .'.� .. )ove sons _t': 1`9_+ 71:71E n - f.' G `',' _ „ _ -r�_ ..�.�.�_ � _ suri�tl c�� ._ . _ _�� �e� �.r-,1�_�t t-�t_1 proposed d 1±gents r,',1-- it .. .),,r-_L. __1 .�'- r- 3L _a'_•_ , n'- .'_'__a nil .7 . '1 part_''ent • s`.:cm7c t;'_'3 nec,3,_.,,_ e:T _u:._tCi-_' aJEJil o l ..::1': the -1.'i;.b _f' '-t1ing SO ' tat this Flattercan :y ti::tc'.1.....:,e ALL an :early' ate. rI . . -2- .. • 'tiays no objections if you wish to forward a copy of this documf nr✓ to DOE concerning the issue of timely action on variances and conditional ,use permits and possible exemption from their approval for minor adj ustmertts only. if we can be .)f any further assistance to you in this matter, 7)1 ease advised Very truly yours, Gerard 1,1. Shell an ;" • 0% HP P . THE CITY OF RENTON n MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 OpA'' AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD O� rt‘ CITY CLERK 4TFDSEPt�� August 19 , 1975 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss . COUNTY OF KING DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says C that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington , over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this' matter. That on the 19th day of August, 1975 , at the hour of 5 : 00 PM your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, Washington , by First Class n!?ailf a COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE PROKSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, dated August 13 , 1975 and NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING to be held September 8th , 1975 theron , said report and Notices mailed to list of plan recipients and other interested parties as furnished by the Renton Planning Dept- ment. 67_ 227 j7.___Lci_,..7( Delores A. Mead, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 20th August , 1975 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing in Renton. cc : Gary Kruger Mr_ . Dwight Potter Mr. John F . ,Parks R.C.B. Marshall The Boeing Company 5227 Ripley Lane N. 2909 Mt. VieW' Avenue Box 3707-Mail Stop 62-15 Renton, Wa. 98055 '. Renton, Wa. 98055 Seattle, Wa. 98124 • Mr. James E . Denzer Iir. Bill Collins D. R. Mansfield 3613 Lake Wa. Blvd. . N. 5301 Ripley Lane N. J.H. Baxter & Co. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 P . 0 . Box 568, Renton, Wa. 98055 ' Mr Dick Houghton Mr. Jack Smith Mr. Bob Kenkman Utilities Engineering 5221 Ripley Lane N. P.O . Box 149 City Hall' Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mrs. Wm, Arthalony Mr. R. DeBoer Lou Bergen 2332 N.E . 31st Stoneway 5029 Ripley Lane N. Renton, Wa. 98055 P . O . Box 509 Renton, Wa. ,98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mrs . Nina Young Mr. Robert Rauscher Mr. Jon Robinson 2224 N.E. 31st Burlington Northern R.R. 3811 Lake Wa. Blvd. N. Renton, Wa. 98055 830 Central Bldg. Renton, Wa. 98055 Seattle , Wa. 98104 Miss Isobel Kemmer Mr . Wilks J. Sullivan Mrs . T.C. Buckingham 2415 N.E. 31st 623 S .W. 158th: St. 5025 Ripley Lane N. Renton, Wa. 98055 Seattle, Wa. 98166 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mrs . Bonnie R. Tabor Mr. Don -Cowles: -fir. Robert Estyr 3509 S .E. 7th St. Burlington Northern R.R. The Boeing Co. Kent Space Renton, Wa. 98055 830 Central Bldg. Center Seattle , Wa. 98104 . . Kent, Wa. 98031 D. 0. -Norman Blanche' Karinen P . M. Jordan P . O. Box 477 1205 Shelton S.E. 2505 Maple Valley Hwy. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. James Hanken Margaret Anderson Mr. Robert B. Martindale 1114 Norton Bldg. , 6827 Ripley Lane N. 616 Stevens Ave . N. Seattle , Wa. 98104 Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr . Richard York Robert K. Butler Jane Shafer 4632 149th S .E. 2501 East D Leagur of Women Voters Bellevue, Wa. 98007 Tacoma Wa. 98421 505 N. Central Kent, Wa. 98031 Milwaukee R.R. Mr . Henry Jameson Elizabeth. Rivily Mr. Geo. S. Wenctillk Logan Building 524 Seneca N.W. 15708 64th N.E . Seattle , Wa. 98101 Renton, Wa. 98055 Bothell , Wa. 98011 H. E. Hurst Mr. Kay Johnson Mr. Stewart W. Pope Milwaukee Railroad Renton C. of C. 3713 Talbot Road S. P , e- enry pwar: 300 Rainier Ave. N. __ Renton, Wa. .98055 Sey4ttle, Wa. 98 ,0.1 Renton, Way. , 98055D. re � Merl E. ''Shaw D. Rodney Mack Mr. Robert W. Schalkle 3107 Nt: View N. :. Shoreline :Div. Land Prog. 664 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Renton, Wa. 98055 Department. Ecology Renton, Wa. 98055 Olympia, Wa. 98504 Mr. L).o_yd Lindberg Mr. Robert McBeth 3111 Mt. View Ave . N. 1632 Lincoln Court S .E. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 B. G. Morrison Mr. Arthur D. ` Scholes 3011 Mr. View Ave. N. 1708 Ferndale S .E. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Charles Guy Sharon. Neglay: . 3101 S.E. 5th St. 656 Lind Ave. N.W. Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Dick York Ro �t Bi of 2121 .5th Ave. 1 . 8 T as e-Apt 107 Seattle , 'Wa. 98121 Rento , Wa. / 8055 Mr. Paul Horn Mr. Alex Cugini , Jr. . 27423 220th Place S .E. 611 Renton, Wa.;9 e:.55 c3` `-'{ Kent, Wa. 98031 Mr. David L. DeVore Mr . William C. Goddard 6928 S. 120th Pl. 3707 Lake War. Blvd. N. Seattle , Wa. 98178 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Gary Mid Dorothy Herbert Puget Power Bldg. 3923 N.E. 6th St. . Bellevue , Wa. 98004 Renton , Wa. 98055 Mr. Tim Okimura Mr. Don Humble + 5642 116th Place S .E. 360 Stevens Ave. S .W. Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr . Clifton F . Garrison Mr . Robert J. Phelps ! c`, t ! 13 158th Place N.E. . 3821 Lake Wa. Blvd. N. j_ Bellevue , Wa. 98008 Renton, Wa. 98055 . _� J `<: �l)� - 1• THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL , pch MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON! 98055 . 235 2583 O . ti �O' August ._13 , 1975 4)4TfD SEPZ- ' • ' .. . COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM The Community Services Committee has reviewed the proposed Shoreline Master Program and recommends that the June 1974 edition be adopted by resolution subject to the following amendments , and forwarded to the Department of Ecology for review : 1 1 PAGE SECTION • AMENDMENT , 4 1 . 03 . 5 Item 6 should. be replaced with the following : "Construction on wetlands . by an owner , lessee or contract pur- chaser of a single family residence for his own use or ' for the use of his . family., which residence does. not -exceed a height ,of thirty-five ( 35) feet above average grade level and which meets all other requirements . " • 9 .2 . 02 . 01 The fee schedule should read as follows : , FEE 'VA-LUE OF DEVELOPMENT $ 50. Less than $10 ,000 $ 75 . $10 , 000 but less' than $50,000 $ 100 . $50 ,000 to $100 ,000 . $150 . More than $100 ,600 i 32 , 4 . 08( new) ' The following paragraph is to be added : . Lake Washington Goals and Policies . . Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies are hereby incor- porated into this Master Program by reference . .Lake Washi'ngto,n and its - wetlands shall be governed by the Lake Washington Regional `Shore.line Goals and. Policies in addition to the goals , policies and regulations set forth in this Master Program. In case of a conflict, the, goals and policies of this Master Program $Q al 1 . prevai l . it Prop sed Shoreline Master Program Commihity Services Report j Page Two Page Section Amendment 35 . 5 . 02 . 02B Delete " the Planning Commission and replace with "conditional use permit" . 35 5 . 02 . 02D( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use permit 35 5 . 02 . 02E ( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional, use: perm-i t" . - 35 5 .02 . 02F( 2) Chance "approval of the Planning Com- mission to " conditional use permilt" . 44 7 . 01 . 0161 Change "may be permitted" to "are prohibited" . 44 7 . 01 . 02A1 Change " twenty ( 20 ) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet 44 7 .01 . 02A2 Change " twenty ( 20 ) feet" to thity- five ( 35) feet" . 45 7 . 01 . 03C (New) There shall be at least twenty ( 20) feet of landscaping adjacent to the water ' s edge when a new hanger or tie down area is constructed . Up tol' fifty ( 50) percent of the landscaped area may used for trails . 48 7 . 04 . 01Delete "excluding single family residences " . •48 7-. 04.02C - Item "C to read : "The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed 111 engineer , and the design has been approved by the Renton Department of Public Works " . 50 7 . 05 . 01B Delete "in the absence of a showing of strict economic necessity by the applicant" . 50 7 . 05 . 02 Delete " however , the Planning Commission may reduce this requirement for 'good reason for those structures that allow public access to and along, the water' s edge" . - Proposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report - Page Three Page Section Amendment 50 7 . 05 . 03 ( New) "Height A commercial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 54 7 . 07 . O1C Change " is approved by the Planning Commission" to "requires a conditional use permit" . 54 7 . 07 . 03 (.Ne.w): - - "He.ight_ An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 55 7 . 08 . 01A Replace item A with : " For detached single family residential uses when the property is located 'between two ( 2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity pro- vided the fill does not exceed one- hundred-twenty-five ( 125 ) feet in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five ( 35 ) feet into the water and 'provided the provisons of Section 8 . 02 are satisfact- orily met. " 55 7 . 08 . O1F Delete item 59 7 . 12 . 02C Item C should read : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . " 60 7 . 12 . 03 ( 1 )a Item a is to read : "The dock may extend - into the water until- a depth of eight (8 ) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100 ) feet . " 61 7 . 12 . 06 The existing sentence is to be replaced with the following : "A . The following dock specifications shall be allowed : 1,. The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty ( 20 ) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty ( 250 ) feet . • • Proposed Shoreline Master Program Comm� ni ty Service s: Report Page Four • Page Section Amendment 61 7 . 12 . 06 2 . The maximum width shall be ( con ' t) twelve ( 12 ) feet . 3 . If feasible the dock is to he parallel to the waters edge . B . Docks shall be placed within the inner harbor line and shall be located no closer than 30 feet to a side property line : C . The dock shall be allowed only by a conditional use permit. " . 70 7 . 19 . 03A2 In the fourth line change "8 . 21 . 01C" - to " 7 . 19 . 01C" . 7.0 7 . 19 . 03B In the ninth line change "8 , 21 . 01C" to 7 . 19 . 01C" 74 8 . 01 Add the following : " Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . " • 75 8 . 03 In the sixth line , delete "within the urban environment" . 75 8 . 04 ( new) Time Limit_ Conditional Permits and Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty ( 30 ) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney • • General ' s Office unless written communication is received by the applicant and .the City indicating otherwise . I. _Y - - J nOict L1i' I -[lAJicK e rUui.- I C,Liz •'-, DISTRIBUTION LIST ` 1 i No . Copies . NameP�' h� IU7Leir ,�/�`� Address k 37 6 7 - �, 6 /-/S 1 a P 1.21.t,^m The Boeing Company, 1 James E . Denzer 3613 Lk . Wash . Blvd . N . , Renton 1 Dick Houghton Utilities Engrg., City, of Renton 1 Mrs . Wm. Arthalony 2332 N . E . 31st , Renton 1 Mrs . Nina Young 2224 N . E . 31st 1 Miss Isobel Kemmer 2415 N . E . 31st 1 Mrs . Bonnie R. Tabor 3509 S . E . 7th St . 2 D .O . Norman P .O . Box 477 5 James Hanken 1114 Norton Bldg . , Seattle T /0Y 1 Richard York Bellevue • 1 Henry Jameson-- -- - - Logan Bldg . , Seattle. 9' ? /G/ 1 'John F . Parks 5227 Ripley Ln . N . 1 Bill Collins 5301 Ripley Ln . . N . 1 Jack Smith 5221 Ripley Ln . N . 1 R . De i-$oev. Stoneway, P .O . Box 509 1 Robert Rauscher Burlington 830 Central Bldg, (Northern Seattle 9?/a ' 1 Mr . Wilks J . Sullivan 623 S .W. 158th�S,t .. , Seattle � 9�'��',/4c, 1 Don Cowles BurlingtonIorthern,�`S�ea�ttl e /Qy 1 Blanche Karinen 1205 Shelton Ave . S .E . , Renton 1 Margaret Anderson 6827 Ripley Lane 3 Robert K. Butler 2501 East D, Tacoma (Milw . R. R. ) 954'c/ 1 Elisabeth Rivily 254 Seneca N . W. , Renton 1 R. C . B. Marshall 2909 Mt . View Avenue • 2 D . R. Mansfield J .H . Baxter & Co . , P .O . Box 568 1 Bob Kenkman P .O . Box 149 2 Lou Bergen 5029 Ripley Ln . 1 Jon Robison 3811 Lake Wash . Blvd . N . 1 Mrs . T. C . -Buckingham 5025 Ripley Lane 1 • Robert Estyr The Boeing Co . (Kent) Space Cente?°3 1 P .M. Jordan 2505 Maple Valley Highway C h e ty I Han-ry C/R 1-4-1-5--N-2-4-t-h S t r-e-e-t 2 Robert B. Martindale 616 Stevens Ave . N . 1 Jane Shafer League of Women Voters ,S-65- 7/ «4A 1 112 3-8—R a i-n i re . S . ,( 9 8-0 a/ L f- I i No . Copies Name Address I i I I I I i1 Geo . S . Wenctillk 15708 64 N . E . , Bot} el1 , Wa . 9a// 1 H .l o/ Hurst,Qyl, z.�—"--z.�. to (e— aR; i, p..„R `— —4a"_i te - AJ d� N P n r c t A + R i ,� 13:a-to -o�ti, C/N-t• Ad-e.ic.Gte ff i U 1 �= g! _e a t t , e IT/0 i I i 1 Merl E . Shaw 3107 Mt . View N . I I 1 . Lloyd Lindberg 3111 Mt . View Ave . N . I 1 • B . G . Morrison 3011 Mt . View Ave . N . I I I 1 Charles Guy 3101 S . E . 5th I I 1 Dick York 2121 5th Ave . , S��attle 47/ / 1 Paul R. Horn 27423 220th Pl . S . E . Kent q V-a3/ I [ 1 David L. DeVore 6928 So . 120th P1 , Seattle �?/7' I 1 Gary Mix Puget Power Bldg . ; Bellevue 9Froo I i 1 Tim Okimura 5642 116th P1 . S . E . , Bellevue '? 1 Clifton F . Garrison 13 158th Place N.IE . , Bellevue /E.- I i1 1 Kay Johnson 300 Rainier Avenue N . /Le...--Q,�,,,. II i i I i i ' • 1 r (0 i I L : i I I , I i I I I 1 I I I CITY OF RENTON i I I j SHORELINE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMT'i.ri 7: I I i M Beth, Robert - Chairman Humble, Don 1632 Lincoln Court SE 360 Stevens Ave. SW Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington 98055 j I 255 - 2123 (home - unlisted) AL 5-3159 it AL5 - 5600 (work) Scholes, Arthur D. - Vice Chairman Phelps, Robert J. 1708 Ferndale Ave. SE 3821 Lake Washington Blvd. N. j I Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington 98055 BA 6-0936 (home) AL 5-4641 237 -7758 (work) Neglav, Sharon - Secretary Pope, W. Stewart 656 .-Lind Ave. NW 3713 Talbot Road S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Washington 98055 SP 2-4921 Al 5-7252 (home) j I GL 4-9578 (work) Bignold, Robert 1308 Thomas Lane, Apt. 107 Schalkle, Robert W. I Renton, Washington 98055 664 Sunset Blvd., NEj AL 5-0321 (borne unlisted) Kenton, Washington 93055 BA 6-3522 (work) AL 5-1885 (home) j I 284-2000 (work) Cugini, Jr. , Alex ! 611 Renton Ave. S. i I Renton Washington 98055 AL 5-1282 '(home) BA 6-3900 (work) I I Coridard, William C. j I 3707 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, Washington 98055 AL 5-8361 i ! I Herbert, Dorothy 3923 NE 6th Street Renton, Washington 98055 AL5 - 8538 . I - I I i r I i August 1, 1973 . • ID1 THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL C 0 '' MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235 2583 Op4O Q� August 13 , 1975 4p SEP-0-* COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE - PROPOSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM i. • The Community Services Committee has reviewed the prp.posed Shoreline Master Program and recommends that the June 197,4 �; gdition 'be adopted by resolution subject to the following' . amendments , and forwarded to the Department of Ecology for review : PAGE SECTION 'AMENDMENT - 4 1 . 03 . 5 . Item 6 should be replaced with the . following : "Construction op. wetlands I , , by an owner , lessee or contract pur- ° Chaser of a single family residence • for his own use or for the use of his family , which residence does not exceed a height of. thirty-five ( 35)„ feet. . above. average grade level which ' meets all other requirements . ". 9 -- 2 . 02 . 01 The fee schedule should read as . follows : FEE VALUE O.F DEVELOPMENT . $ 50 . Less than $ 10 ,000 • $ 75 . $ 10 ,000 but less than $50,000 . $ 100 . $50 ,000 to $ 1n0 ,000 $150 . More than $100 ,000 32 4 . 08( new) - The following paragraph 'is to be added : Lake Washington Goals and ' Policies . i . Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies are hereby incor- porated into this Master. Program by reference . Lake Washington and its . , wetlands shall be governed by the Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies in addition to the goals , policies and regulations • set forth in this Master Program . In case of a conflict , the {goa-ls and pgli ies of this Master Program Sl al ] prevail . • i Pr. posed Shoreline Master Pro9ra,m Co munity Services Report Pa . e Two Pare Section Amendment 30 5 . 02 . 026 Delete "the Planning Commission and replace with "conditional use permit" . 3. 5 . 02. 02D( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use permit" . 3 , 5 . 02 . 02E( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to; - - "conditional , use permit'! . _ - - 3 ' 5 .02 . 02F( 2) Change "approval of the Planning Com- mission to " conditional use permit" . 4, 7 . 01 . 01B1 Change "may be permitted" to "ahe prohibited" . I, 4, 7 . 01 . 02A1 Change "twenty ( 20) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet" . 4, 7 . 01 . 02A2 Change "twenty ( 20 ) feet" to thrty- five ( 35) feet" . 4 ' 7 . 01 . 03C (New) There shall be at least twenty 11( 20) feet of landscaping adjacent to' the - water ' s edge when a new hanger br tie down area is constructed . Up to fifty ( 50) percent of the l ands,caped' area may be used for trails . 4n 7 . 04 . 01 Delete "excluding' single family residences " . 4: 7`. 0-4`.02C " ' —Item C to read-: "The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed engineer, and the design has been approved by the Renton Departme1nt of Public Works " . 5 7 . 05 . 01B Delete "in the absence of a showing of strict economic necessity by, the applicant" . 5C 7 . 05 . 02 Delete "however , the Planning Commission may reduce this requirement for, good reason for those structures that allow public access to and along the water ' s edge" . _ . Proposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report • Page Three Page Section Amendment 50111 7 . 05 . 03 (New) "Heighht A commercial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 54 7 . 07 . 01C Change " is approved by the Planning Commission " to " requires a conditional use permit" . 54 7 . 07 . 03 ( Ne.w) "Height_ An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 55 7 . 08 . O1A Replace item A with : " For detached single family residential uses when the property is located betweenitwo ( 2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity pro- vided the fill does not exceed one- hundred-twenty-five ( 125 ) feet in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five ( 35 ) feet into the water and provided the provisons of Section 8 . 02 are satisfact- orily met . " I , 55 7 . 08 . O1F Delete item F 59 7 . 12 . 02C Item C should read : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . " 60 7 . 12 . 03 ( 1 )a Item a is to read : "The dock May extend into the water until- a, depth of eight (8 ) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100 ) feet ." 61 7 . 12 . 06 The existing sentence is to bejreplaced with the following : "A . The following dock specifications shall be allowed : 1 . The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty ( 20 ) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty ( 250 ) feet . c• : • • • P oposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report Page Four Pa e Section Amendment 6 7 . 12 . 06 2 . The maximum width shall be ' ( con ' t) twelve ( 12 ) feet . 3. If feasible the dock is to ' he parallel to the waters edge . B . Docks shall_ be placed within the inner harbor line and shall be located no closer than 30 feet to a side property line . C . The dock shall be allowed only by a conditional use permit. " 7 7 . 19 . 03A2 In the fourth line change " 8. 21 . O1C" to "7 . 19 . 01C" . 7 7 . 19 . 03E In the ninth line change " 8 , 21 . 01C" to 7 . 19 . 01C" 7 8 . 01 Add the following : " Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . " 75 8 . 03 In the sixth line , delete "within the urban environment" . 75 • 8 . 04 ( new) Time Limit__ Conditional Permits ',and • Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty (30 ) calendar days from the date of mailing to' the • Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written communication is received by the, applicant and the City indicatin'c otherwise . ' I `sue• v ; j THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Z p MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055,E 235 2583 Of O4O � August 13 , 1975 ��TFU SE rit ! i COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM !� 1 The Community Services Committee has reviewed the proposed Shoreline Master Program and recommends that the June 1974 edition •be adopted by resolution subject to the following '' amendments , and forwarded to the Department of Ecology for review: l PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 4 1 . 03 . 5 Item 6 should be replaced with the following : "Construction on' wetland's by an owner , lessee or contract pur- chaser of a single family residence for his own use or for th9 use of his family , which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five ( 35).i. feet above average grade level and which meets all other requirements . " 9 2 . 02 . 01 The fee schedule should read as follows : FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT $ 50 . - Less than $ 10 ,000 $ 75 . $ 10 ,00,0 but less than $50 ,000 $ 100 . $50 ,000 to $100i,000 I $150 . More than $100 ,000 j 32 + 4 . 08(new) The following paragraph is to be added : Lake Washington Goals and Policies. Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies are hereby incor- porated into this Master Program by reference . Lake' Washington and its wetlands shall be governed by the Lake Washington Regional IShoreline Goals and Policies in addition to the goals , policies and 'regulations set forth in this Master i Pro,gram. In case of a conflict , the goals and policies of this Master Program Stall prevail . • Pro i pled Sh.orel one Master pro9ram • . ' Com unity Services Report • • Pag Two • • Pag Section Amendment 35 5 . 02 . 02E Delete ' the Planning Commission and replace with "conditional use permit" . 35 5 . 02. 02D( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use permit" . • 35 5 . 02 . 02E( 2) Change " Planning Commission" to 1, • - "conditional 'Use per.mi t" . - , . -- • 35 5 .02 . 02F( 2) Change "approval of the PlanningLCom- mission to " conditional use permit" . 44 7 . 01 . 0161 Change "may be permitted" to "a.re prohibited" . 44 7 . 01 . 02A1 Change " twenty ( 20) feet" to thiiIty- five ( 35) feet" . 44 . 7 .01 . 02A2 Change " twenty ( 20) feet" to thir4y- five ( 35) feet" . I'. 45 7 . 01 . 03C (New) There shall be at least twenty ) feet of landscaping adjacent to the water ' s edge when. a new' hanger or' tie down area is constructed . Up to �i fifty ( 50) percent of the landscaped' area may be used for trails . 48 7 . 04 . 01 Delete "excluding single family residences " . j 48 7'. 04':-02C 7tem` C' to read : "The bulkhead - design has been approved by a licensed engineer , and the design has been), approved by the Renton Department of Public Works " . 50 7 . 05 . 01E Delete "in the absence of a showing of strict economic necessity by the applicant" . 50 7 . 05 . 02 Delete "however , the Planning Commission may reduce this requirement for good reason for those structures that ' allow public access to and along the water ' s edge" . - ��, • Proposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report Page Three Pale ; Section Amendment 50 7 . 05 . 03 (New) "Height A commercial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 54 7 . 07 . 01C Change " is approved by the Planing Commission �� to "requires a conditional use permit" . 54 7 . 07 . 03 ( New) . "Height An industrial building shall be. no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 55 7 . 08 . O1A Replace item A with : " For detached single family residential uses when the property is located between two ( 2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity pro- vided the fill does not exceed one- hundred-twenty-five ( 125 ) feet in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five ( 35) feet into the water and provided the provisons of Section 8 . 02 are satisfact- orily met . " 55 7 . 08 . 01E Delete item F 59 7 . 12 . 02C Item C should read : "Thedes'ign of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . " 60 7 . 12 . 03 ( 1 )a Item a is to read : "The dock may extend into the water _u-n.ti-l. a depth of eight (8 ) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100 ) feet . " 61 7 . 12 . 06 The existing sentence is to bel replaced with the following : "A . The following dock specifications shall be allowed : 1 . The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty ( 20 ) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty ( 250 ) feet . Proposed Shoreline Master Program Co I�nuni ty Services Report �I Page Four Pape Section Amendment 61 7 . 12 . 06 2 . The maximum width shall be ( con ' t) twelve ( 12 ) feet . 3. If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the waters edge . B .. Docks shall be placed within the inner harbor line and shall be located no closer' than 30 'feet to a side property line . C . The dock shall be allowed only by a conditional use permit . " 70 7 . 19 . 03A2 In the fourth line change "8 . 21 . 01C" to " 7 . 19 , 01C" . 70 7 . 19 . 03B In the ninth line change "8 , 21 . 01C" to 7 . 19 . 01C" . 74 8 . 01 Add the following : " Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s . Office for approval or denial . " 75 8 .03 In the sixth line , delete "within the urban environment" . 75 8 . 04 ( new) Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances sh-all be deemed to be • approved within thirty ( 30 ) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written communication is received by the applicant and the City indicating otherwise . • ` III • , S `1�AS , . THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL 2 p MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235 2583 ti �o +4 August .13 1975 434 co SEPT00 COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM The Community Services Committee has reviewed the proposed Shoreline Master Program and recommends that the June 1974 edition be adopted by resolution subject to the following amendments , and forwarded to the Department of Ecology for review: , . PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT 4 1.. 03 . 5 Item 6 should be replaced with the following : " Construction .on wetlands by an owner , lessee or contract pur- . chaser of a , single family 'residence for his own use or for the use of his family , which residence does not exceed : a height of thirty-five ( 35) feet above average grade level - 4nd which meets all other requirements . " 9, ' 2 . 02 . 01 The fee schedule should read as follows : . f FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT $ 50 . . Less than $ 10 ,000 $ 75 . . $ 10 ,000 but less than $50,000 - $ 100. $50 ,000 to $100 ,000 • $150 . More than $100 ,000 32 4 .08( new) The following paragraph is 'Ito be added : Lake Washington Goals and Policies . Lake Washington Regional Shoreline Goals and Policies are hereby incor- - • porated into this Master P 'r.ogram by reference . Lake Washington .and its wetlands shall be governed : by the Lake Washington Regional 'Shoreline Goals and' Policies in addition to ' the goals , policies and regulations set forth in this Master Program. In case of a. c•onfl.ict , ' the1goals and policies of this Master Program ' . Sfrall prevail . • Propos'ed Shoreline Master Program CommJnity Services Report Page Two Page Section Amendment 35 5 . 02 . 026 Delete " the Planning Commission and replace with " conditional use permit" . • 35 5 . 02 . 02D( 2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use permit" . 35 5 . 02 . 02E ( 2) • Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use, permW . , 35 5 . 02 . 02F( 2) Change "approval of the Planning Com- • mission to " conditional use perm It" . 44 7 . 01 . 0161 Change "may be permitted" to "are prohibited" . ' 44 7 . 01 . 02A1 . • Change " twenty. ( 20 ) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet" . 44 7 . 01 . 02A2 Change " twenty ( 20 ) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet" . 45 7 . 01 . 03C (New) There shall, be at least twenty ( 20) feet of landscaping adjacent to the water ' s edge when a new hanger or tie down area , is constructed . Up to fifty ( 50) percent of the landscaped area may be used for trails . 48 7 . 04 . 01 ' Delete "excluding single family residences " . . . . 48 ' 7104 . 02C - - Item C to read : "The bulkhead design has been approved by a licensed engineer, and the design has been approved by the Renton Department of Public Works " . 50 7 . 05 . 016 Delete "in the absence of a showing of strict economic necessity by the applicant" . 111 50 • 7 . 05 . 02 Delete " however , the Planning COmmission may reduce this requirement forlgood reason for those structures that allow public access to and alon4 the water ' s edge" . Proposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report Page Three • Page Section Amendment 50 , 7 . 05 . 03 (New) " Height A commercial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) . feet high . " 54 7 . 07 . O1C • Change " is approved by .the Planning Commission" to "requires a conditional use permit" . 54 7 . 07 . 03 ( New ) "HeiIht_ An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 55 7 . 08 . 01A Replace item A with : " For detached single family residential uses when the property is located between two ( 2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity pro- vided the fill does not exceed one- hundred-twenty-five ( 125 ) feet' in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five ( 35 ) feet into the water and provided the provisons of Section 8 . 02 are satisfact- orily met . " 55 7 . 08 . O1F Delete item F _59 7 . 12 . 02C Item C should read : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . " 60 7 . 12 . 03 ( 1 )a Item a is to read : "The dock may extend . . into the water -u.n-ti.L a- depth of eight ( 8 ) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100 ) feet . " 61 7 . 12 . 06 - The existing sentence is to be ' replaced with the following : "A . The following .dock specifications shall be allowed : 1 . The dock may extend into the water until a depth of twenty ( 20 ) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty ( 250 ) feet . • • Proposed Shoreline Master Program • • Community Services Report Page Four • Page Section • Amendment 61 ' 7 . 12 . 06 2 . The maximum width shall be ( con ' t) twelve ( 12 ) feet . 3. If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the waters edge . B . Docks shall _ be placed withini the inner harbor line and shall • be located no closer than 30 feet to a side property line ., C . The dock shall be allowed only • by a conditional use permit . " • 70 7 . 19 . 03A2 In the fourth line change " 8 . 21 . O1C" to "7 . 19 . 01C" . 70 ' 7 . 19 . 03E In the ninth line change "8 , 21 . 01C" to 7 . 19 . 01C" 74 I 8 . 01 Add the following : " Both variances and conditional use permits are• • forwarded to the Department of • Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office for approval or denial . " 75 8 . 03 In the sixth line , delete "within the urban environment" . • 75 8 . 04 ( new) Time Limit Conditional Permits and • Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty ( 30 ) calendar days from the date of mailing to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General ' s Office unless written • communication is received by the applicant and the City indicating otherwise . /r . _ PPW /Rent.on' City Council _ 8/18/75 - Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS - Continued LID 288 . Letter from Finance Director Marshall reported August 15, 1975, bid Whitman Ct.N. E. opening for informal bids on interim financing for L. I .D. No. 288 Interim Financing for $111 ,250 with lowested interest rate of 5.49% received from Peoples National Bank. Other bids were noted: 5. 50% from Rainier Bank and 6.50% from Seattle First National Bank. The Finance Director recommended acceptance of the low bid of Peoples National• Bank. MOVED BY CLYMER, I SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AND ACCEPT THE BID OF PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK. CARRIED. Appeal #800507 Notice of Appeal was filed with Superior Court of King County and copy LID 286, by , with the Renton City Clerk by 'Douglas R. Hartwich, attorney for, Appel- R.A. Fawcett ', lants , Robert A. and Clarissa M. Fawcett regarding City assessment . for L. I .D. 286, sanitary sewers in the Kennydale area, claiming' no benefit to property. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Claim for Damages Claim for Damages was filed by Daniel Charles Baptist, 1220 S. Holgate, D. C. Baptist ; Seattle, in the sum of $50,000 for alleged unlawful arrest on 4/18/75. Summons and Complaint was filed with Superior Court of King County by Summons & attorney for Phillip A. Schmolke and Jacqueline M. Schmolke, aka Jacque- Complaint #800336 line M. Russo vs. City in amount of $35,000 for a traffic accident, P.A. Schmolke claim having been filed 4/7/75 and a second claim for damages in. the amount of $150,000 and other benefits for complain arising in accord- ' ance with RCW 35. 31 . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY , COUNCIL REFER THESE TWO CLAIMS TO THE LEGAL OFFICE AND INSURANCE CARRIER. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENTS Letter from Mayor Garrett announced reappointment to the Renton 'Board, Board of ! of Adjustment of Felix A. Campanella, 226 Seneca Ave. N.W., to position Adjustment ' No. 1 , and of John P. Qualls , ' 17804 98th Ave. S. , to position No'. 2, F.A. Campanella terms expiring September 6, 1979.' The letter requested residency J. P. Qualls requirement be waived for Mr. ' Qualls as he resides just outside4the • City limits. MOVED BY DELAURENTI', SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR INCLUDING WAIVING OF THE RESIDENCY REQUIRE- MENT. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report Legislation Com. recommending that a public hearing be set for September 8, 1975 _for Report adoption of the City' s Shoreline Master Program as amended. MOVED BY ' DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND Shoreline Master SET DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR AMENDMENTS TO SHORELINE MASTER PLAN . Program Councilman Stredicke noted the Shoreline Master Program had been Amendments , adopted by Council following Citizen' s Advisory Committee recommenda- Public Hearing tions and Public Hearing before the Council , that the Department of 9/8/75 Ecology has not adopted the City's plan and has suggested changes , ! therefore a Public Hearing requested. Planning Director Ericksen • noted changes in the plan would be explained at the public hearing: , Councilman Perry noted the matter of local control was important issue. MOTION CARRIED. Finance & Personnel Coma Finance & Personnel Committee report recommended that the Council Report concur in the Mayor' s appointment of Mr. Donald Doubles to the Renton Police Civil ' Police Civil Service Commission. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY Service Com. - STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. Upon inquiry D. Doubles by Councilman Bruce, Mayor Garrett noted Mr. Doubles has been resident of the City for three years. MOTION CARRIED. Public Works Public Works Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report con- Committee Rpt. curring in the Public Works Department recommendation to accept the low bid submitted by Associated Sand and Gravel Co. , Inc. of Tukwila, Bid Award in the amount of $6,974 for street overlay of Mill Ave. S. and S. 2nd Street Overlay as shown in attached bid tabulation and in earlier bid opening. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDA- TION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND ACCEPT LOW BID, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CONTRACT. Upon inquiry by Council- man Stredicke re extent of widening of Mill Ave. S. , Councilman ,Grant noted 3 ft. widening. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Clymer noted the City's Boccie Champions, Councilman Delaurenti and Councilman Perry. ; �I - 0 R ENT t,4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON tCITY CoUNCIL N0TICY IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renf,on City Counnil haa fixed the t h dtly of SqVrther - - 0 19 _2i_, 4L 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chmmbers of the 'Renton Municipai uilding , Renton , Waehington eo the time and place for a public he,irinq to conoider the fol) owing ,., Amendme,n,;s to the City' Shore)ine Niv;ter Provo. Any tx all interested pereons are invited to be pre8ent to vo-f-pe approval , disappreval an opinions on ed.ME! CITY OF REUTON 17:,elore A . ?,!,.ead , City Clerk DAT,r, OF PUB.RtCAT_KON Si29/71-: II 1 THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL ov • 8MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235 2583 Of O Ao August 13 , 1975 q, g IFO SEPI- COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM • The Community Services Committee has reviewed the proposed Shoreline Master Program and recommends- that the June 1974 edition be adopted by resolution subject to the following amendments , and forwarded to the Department of Ecology for review : PAGE SECTION AMENDMENT . 4 1 . 03 . 5 Item 6 should be replaced with the following : " Construction on` wetlands by an owner , lessee or contract pur- chaser of a single family residence for his own use or for theiuse of his family , which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five ( 35) feet above average grade level and which meets all other requirements . " 9 2 . 02 . 01 The fee schedule should read as follows : FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT 1 $ 50 . Less than $ 10 ,000 $ 75 . $10 , 000 but less than $50,000 $ 100 . $50 ,000 to $ 100 ,000 $150 . . More than $10.0 ,000 1 32 4 . 08(new) The following paragraph i,s to be added : Lake Washington Goals and Policies . Lake Washington Regional ;Shoreline Goals and Policies are hereby incor- porated into this Master PI.ogram by reference . Lake Washington and its wetlands shall be governed by the Lake Washington Regional lShoreline Goals and Policies in addition to the goals , policies and regulations set forth in this Master P ogram. In .case of a conflict , the goals and poli ies of this Master Program sit-all prevail . Pro • sed Shoreline Master Program Com unity Services Report Pag : Two • Pag- Section ' Amendment 35 5 . 02 . 02E Delete " the Planning Commission and replace with "conditional use permit" . 35 5 . 02 . 02D(2) Change "Planning Commission" to "conditional use permit" . 35 - 5 . 02 . 02E ( 2) Change " Planning Commission" to - "conditional use permit" . 35 5 .02 . 02F( 2) Change "approval of the Planning Com- mission to " conditional use permit" . 44 7 . 01 . 0161 Change "may be permitted" to "are prohibited" . 44 7 . 01 . 02A1 Change " twenty ( 20) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet" . I 44 7 .01 . 02A2 Change " twenty ( 20 ) feet" to thirty- five ( 35) feet" . 45 7 . 01 . 03C (New) There shall be at least twenty ( 20) feet of landscaping adjacent to the water ' s edge when a new hanger or tie down area is constructed . Up to fifty ( 50) percent of the landscaped area may be used for trails . 1 48 7 . 04 . 01 Delete "excluding single family residences " . 48 • • 7 . 04'. 02C ` `" -"Item' 'C to read : ,"The bulkhead esign has been approved by a licensed I engineer, and the design has been approved by the Renton Department of Public Works " . 50 7 . 05 . 01E Delete "in the absence of a showing of . strict economic necessity by Ithe applicant" . 50 7 . 05 . 02 Delete "however , the Planning Commission may reduce this requirement for good reason for those structures that, allow public access to and along the water ' s edge" . r I • Proposed Shoreline Master Program Community Services Report PagelThree Pag. Section Amendment 50 7 . 05 . 03 (New) "Height A commercial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 54 ! 7 . 07 . 01C Change " is approved by the Planning Commission " to "requires a conditional use permit" . 54 7 . 07 . 03 (New) , "Height An industrial building shall be no more than thirty-five ( 35 ) feet high . " 55' - ! 7 . 08 . 01A Replace item A with : " For detached single family residential uses when the property is located between two ( 2 ) existing bulkheads the property may be filled to the line of conformity pro- vided the fill does not exceed one- hundred-twenty-five ( 125 ) feet in length along the water ' s edge and thirty-five ( 35 ) feet into the water and provided the provisons of Section 8 . 02 are satisfact- orily met . " 55 7 . 08 . 01F Delete item F 59 7 . 12 . 02C Item C should read : "The design of all piers and docks shall be approved by a licensed engineer or licensed architect . " 60 7 . 12 . 03 ( 1 )a Item a is to read : "The dock may extend - - - - into the water until a,.. depth of eight (8 ) feet is reached provided the dock length does not exceed one hundred ( 100 ) feet . " 61 7 . 12 . 06 The existing sentence is to be replaced with the following : "A . The following dock specifications shall be allowed : 1 . The dock may extend into th,e water until a depth of twenty _ ( 20 ) feet is reached provided the length does not exceed two hundred fifty ( 250 ) feet . • _, ry r_.` Pro osed Shoreline Master Program • - . I Com ' unity Services Report Pag:. Four • . Pag : Section Amendment 61 ' 7 . 12 . 06 2.. The maximum width shall be ( con ' t) twelve ( 12 ) feet . 3. If feasible the dock is to be parallel to the waters edge . B . Docks shall be- .placed-within, ' . the .inner harbor line and shall be located no closer than 301 , feet to a side property line;. C . The dock shall be allowed only by a conditional use permit. !" 70 7 . 19 . 03A2 ' In the fourth line change "8 . 21 . 01C" to " 7 . 19 . 01C" . ' • 70 ' 7 . 19 . 038 In the ninth, line change "8 ,21 . 0'�1C" ' to 7 . 19 . 01C" 74 8. 01 Add the following : " Both- variances and conditional use permits are I. • forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General,' s Office for approval or denial . " 75 8 .03 In the sixth' line , delete "within the urban environment" . 1 75 8 . 04 ( new) Time Limit Conditional Permits and Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty ( 30 ) cale'ndar days from the date of mailing to the • Department of Ecology and ,the Attorney General ' s Office unless written , ' communication is received by the, ' applicant and the City indicating ' otherwise . .• 2, _ ) , - • c1114626:visill • COMKIJNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 23, 1974 ITEM 1: HOUSING OlvilviUNITY DEVEI,OPMNIT PROGRAM The Community Services Committee recommnds that the nutter of the agreement • for Housing and Community Development be referred to the Legislation' Committee and the Committee of the •W'nole. • • This committee has revieWe.d the agreement for planning execution and the .distribution of certain block. grant .fuads. Because af the deadline ,;et • on these funds we feel it is imperative that the Council take this matter .; : up concurrently so that it can act upon it at the earliest possible date. • • ITEM 2 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM STA1US REPORT • e_Comunity Services Committee met last week with representatives of the • • partment of Ecology and staff to learn D.O.E. °s cormirre.nts. The Planning staff is going to continue meeting with D.O.E. to formulate possible • amendments to the Shoreline Master Program. • • • • • • Chairman WfTliam J. Grant • • kenneth Bruce Chas J. Delaurenti WJG:mg • • • . . • • • • : - • I ' t �y �,_)k. ,.� ?ay *1-)'-' ;jt /il .,/ ),,',, ,,R\ 1 ../.1;\ vil JP 1,, a to 4,�,, `• „�� ' .3�,,.''" Stilt('()f September 26 , 1974 ' iN islmigtoii f)ep arts»c'iit' :. Of f 1'O1()g;' ' 144 Dear Sir: As indicated by letter of September 10 , 1974 , please' find enclosed an assessment concerning the proposed regulations dealing with Shoreline permits . Because these regulations are administrative in nature , it , { 'appears there will be no significant environmental impact. However, if you foresee significant effects , 'please 'note „ them, giving as much detail as possible. . Our final decision will be based upon the detail of your reply. Please note we must have your reply on or before October 31 , 1974. - -1 Si/n/ d e y,, ife, /72 . , , R. Leighton Pratt . Authorization Control Supervisor RLP :emp .. { Enclosure , Daniel J.Evans,Governor John A.Biggs,Director ' Olympia,Washington 98504 Telephone(206)753'2800 i SUMMARY. SHEET �t�tt(�Of • W—I lit >t(m 1 '; l)C' )i1111,-neIlt= cm l ) v •' Environmental Assessment Nature of this Report • ... n • Sponsor: State of Washington i Department of Ecology Olympia-, Washington f," ': t � Contact Person: Leighton Pratt. . (753-3889) rype of Proposed Action Administrative,' Action :'' Oficial Title of Proposed Amendment concerning permits for '. Proposed Action: . •,.- Substantial Developments on' Shorelines of. '.. the State (Chapter 173-14 WAC) Response Deadline:` Thirty day day: review period. ending October i' 31', 1974 . Recipients of the Document • LOCAL AGENCIES. ' ALL Boards of CountyCommissioners. TALL; County- Planning' :Directors ! ALL Mayors':.:of• Cities' with. Shorelines (Attu. Planning Directors) . STATE AGENCIES = , Department of Agriculture. ' Department of Emergency Services Department. of Commerce and Economic Development ,I:, • Department of Ecology j : ' Department of Fisheries t • , .•'j'Department of Game , Department of Highways Department ,of Natural Resources ; Daniel J:Evans,Governor John A.Biggs,Director Olympia,Washington 98504 Telephone(206)753-2800' Page Two • (State Agencies, Cont' ) , Department. of Social and Health Services '' , Office of Community Development' Interagency, Committee for Outdoor Recreation Parks and ,Recreation Commission 'Office of .Program.:' Planning, and Fiscal Management., FEDERAL' AGENCIES U.S ForestService, 1 U. S. Bureau, of Reclamation , U.S". Army Corps, of Engineers` U.S;• Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service ' " ' Environmental' Protection Agency U. S. ! Sports :Fisheries U.S. Bureau .of Land 'Management i':..' U. S. '.Bureau,'of Indian Affairs rs '.: Bnneville' Power Administration: • -� 1 t I h; Environmental • Assessment Relative to Department of Ecology Administrative Action :on Permits for Substantial Development.; • On Shorelines of the State This environmental assessment is issued pursuant to Chapter 43. 21C, ..Revised Code ,of Washington, State Environmental Policy. Act of 1971 , :and is further relative to the authority, of the' ,, department .under the authoritieslgranted to it by Chapter 90 . 58 , the Shorelines Management Act of 1971 . , BACKGROUND The Shorelines 'Management Act of 1971 , which was passed �.,.-: I by the 42nd legislature and `:ratified by the people of the State'of.' Washington in .November, 1972 , became effective June 1 1971 . The. Act provides the means for developing the necessary planning and permit , program between . local government and the 'state.; Local government 'has the primary responsibility' for:' initiating the planning program and administering . the regulatory requirements of the,.Act , with the Department of Ecology acting in a review and supportive In December, 19.71 the ,,Department of- Ecology, acting. I' ` in its supportive role, adopted regulations (WAC 173-14) to establish basic rules :for the permit .system. „ ; In the course:,of., three ;years ,,:;the regulations of. the Department •,of Ecolo'gy.:.pertaining to "the permit system of the { Shoreline Management Act have been quite effective: .• Experience has necessitated, however, the making of certain modifications '.'to :':ensure the' continued: strength of the program:. II, PURPOSE The :proposed. action . (attachment A) , is administrative ,in nature...and .pertains. to the adoption and amending of regulations dealing with. the permit system. Many of, the changes are minor, :;housekeeping matters , such as the inclusion of '.the' $2 , 500 .00 . single family j : .'.:,. ' . �•,,' ,• dock ' exemption which results' from an amendment of the, '' „� � ' �' sta'tute: Pae 2 . The :major, changes Fare , , (a) The addition of ' posting and mailing of notice, of 'application requirement as a means of notification of surrounding property owners (WAC 173-14-070.)'; (b) Revisions in the .a application pp ion form to paint a clearer picture of the site and project . for',`• • the reviewer and to provide needed data not presently required,, such as the relationship of s tru c u t res to proposed residential views, (WAC .173-14-110),; c 'P rovid•( ) 'Providing for' a letter of exemption ,,: 'I' (cur rently ntlY be ing ng us ed ed by some local governments) to be sent to the department where a development falls within exemp- tions from the permit system set forth in WAC 173-14-040 (WAC 173- - 14 11S (d) Providing a' system for 'permits' for. condi-'.' 't "' tional uses and variances fl as required by ' ' RCW 90. 58 100 (5) (WAC 173-14-130-200) • -_.,. ... . (e) � Provisions setting forth the applicability. ' .. - • of • the permit program to the activities of I federal agencies and activities within boundaries of federal lands'; (f.) ':' ,A. system for revising substantial develw - • ment' permits once acted upon P• . III , _ EXISTING CONDITIONS ' As previously mentioned,:. the present regulations are, for'' . the' most part, functioning.:: However, there are particular. sections ,which need clarification and strengthening. For instance, there 'have" been :many cases where surrounding 'property, owners and the general public 'are directly_.. affe cted the ' proposed •s ed acti by� vit P P y: but were totally � : unaware of the' proposed project P P P J c Publication of " I notice in the local paper was.'.not doing the job. :'. Many times .:there was a long delay in theproject.y . . ; causing hard feelings and increasing project costs=, which might have been alleviated had the nroperty been posted. 4 • Paige 3.'. Another-,problem was was evidenced by the fact' that:,roughly : 50 to ;60% of, the appeals filed by the Department of ' Ecology have been based upon insufficient plan detail orr information necessary for state review 1 The granting of exemptions has caused , considerable { „ . concern, misunderstanding, and time delay. And ' finally, the Act .as it exists does not allow for, permit revision without going through the total permit process „ IV ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA CT OF THE PRO POSED ACTI ON ON It is the responsibility of the State of Washington to establish and adopt a state wide master program and I` . associated permit system for the management of the 1 ,' shorelines of the state. This proposed regulation is j promulgated under the authority of the Department of ',. Ecology, Chapter. 90. 58 RCW, as it pertains to 'the , implementation system. .: ;. The subject' action constitutes an administrative procedure ' ,. I that would lead to clarification and strengthening of: I': "_ existing or establishment 'of, new procedures dealing with shoreline permits . This step, in itself, does not create an environmental impact. i r PUBLIC INPUT To accommodate 'publ ic involvement , ve en twor t , hearings s � have ' been•:. 9� g scheduled concerning' this ' regulation. (1) Eastern Washington . ° . . The hearing will be held on Tuesday October 15, , 197 4f Washington Water Po werl Auditorium, East 1411 Mission, Spokane, beginning at 10 : 00 A.M. ,_' (2) Western Washington ' The hearing will, be held on 'Wednesday, ,October'' : ' 23, 1974, Department, of, Ecology Hearing Rm. ' St. 'Martin's campus , Lacey, beginning at' 10 :00 .A.M. , is �. is PERMITS FOR .SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON SHORELINES .OF THE STATE ,, CHAPTER,,173-14 WAC , ' , r , ' '' - ' P ROPOSED"AMENDMENT • ' j,. .i ;I ApgD,, WAC i173,-�, ,,;AUTHORITY'r.,, ,Th'i's„regulatio..-�s, adopted', 'pursuant:to:RCW;'90.,:'58:'1'40('3}, :and"RCW'`90:5'8.200.''", I' AMDI WAC 173-14-020 .` PURPOSE'. ;RCW '90'58•:140(3) requires (local governments''to'establish a'program, consistent with rules ' • ted 'by,';.the:•department of ecology,•.,for the administration and , , >;.; enforcement 'of ,the';permit •system 'established therein.,, The pur- pose of 'this.:regulation .is,`to.;.establish basic'rules for the • �'`` ermit lsystem.� • I} ',i.I 'IV. P 'll�f • AMD WAC' 173-14-030 `'DEFINITIONS. ! , • '' The following definitions shall apply,: ' : (1) !"Department" ,means. the department of ecology ;.' (2}.'. "Local government';- means 'any.'County,''•incorporated' -. ; city lori town which-.contains within: its'boundaries •any 'lands_ or'' ' ub'ect :to„.:'this 'chapter , �; waters°�',s � P wal or�d`isa nova �,;. (3) "Final order shall include .the appro pp • } -of: a' permit`"or '.a 'letter`of, exemption. "Permit 'shall include ' substantial.•develop ent'permit ti,:. •' Perm r • ", . conditional+•use:Permit and variance. _ ''(5) Act shall. mean. chapter 2'86, Laws of 1971, Ex. Sess ';�;;, the Shoreline. Mana ement Act. of 1971. • ., , gal development undertaken,' on the shorelines I , , (.6)..'•'' "Substantial development �of•.the:''state: prior to the,effective.date of the Act" shall mean' �'. .'actual:;construction''•begun •upon'' the shoreline-as opposed to pre-' liminary`'engineering:or, planning.: !,; 'r The .definitions 'and. concepts;'bet. forth `in RCW 90.58.030 shall also',applyas-.used:herein. ''; AMD, WAC '173-14-040, , EXEMPTIONS FROM PERMIT SYSTEM The 1'' following, shall•not require' permits for; the purposes;of the . g.act i �, '4 :.Any.;development: of which`the •total cost or fair;;.: ,'', !t', • •market'°value.. does' not exceed. $1000, if such development',does'• ? not,•.materially interfere with' ;the ,normal: public use of .the'' i. • ..water ,or.'shorelines 'of the-,state. 1 •• ' (2)'' ' Normalr,maintenance or repair of existing structures • .• + • ,t' or' developments,' 'including damage by'accident, fire or ,'ele-. .� "'I: o protective'bulkhead �(3)'' ,Construction of'-the'.n rinal' i common to' single-'family residences. '• ' • ' (9) Emergency construction necessary to 'protect``property elements. from.,damage by the. ,+' cultu ral� m •a ri t tion of. a'barn+•'or,�'si ilar <se (.5) .Cons ruc9 'structure ,on wetlands'. i • ;` " • • ' • (6)+ 1°Construction or modification of navigational` aids ' 1'such as channel.;,markers.and anchor:'buoys r, •• - • (7)`';, 'Construction. on wetlands by an:owner., lessee.or• - + '' ' ; ' ' ,f, ` ,-contract `purchaser.,of;;a,single-family residence for his'own use or. for'the, use of::`•his 'family ' which. residence does not e exceed:',e. height of"thirty-five :feet above average grade level , and which`meets';all requirements of the state agency ,or local . government having., jurisdiction thereof,. other, than:require- • "/-• ! ' ments ,imposed pursuant to this -chapter. ` .- • ' • (8)• 'Construction of• a dock, designed for pleasure' craft . • +',''only, for :the, private noncommercial use of the owners, 'lessee,. ';,; ,:'', or' contract purchaser of a single-family residence', the cost ' of,which'does`not,, exceed two thousand five hundred dollars 2 'I j: 'I „y'ry � 'I sal"•i� • I. mil' •; )'` 'i, I a• I. i I• i II' , • ,t. !,"' 5�',.: '5;;' " #,.. ?''i�.:i';,1:,; r�;�,i F,a:,c;�i'c .,p. t;. 11, , • • • f ,(9.) tAny proect:.wih a certification'.frgiii• the governor I, ; i • ,. .; .• ,r .r„ -t chapter••,$0.50: RCW . .. 1., �'pursuarit•:, o , . :;�' � : ' ,•'.',, , '• ;' inSaddition' to.>therabove, no permit. shall be requited for ; • k any'Idevelopmenton shorelines of,..:the state.'included ,with'in' a " ' , , ,�, - preliminary or final;plat a proved''by. the applicable, state` ;'' •�'' agencyi'or;local •government.;prior',,to: April•, `1971, •if ' 'j 1-, (1);,i;The•final,.plat was..approved, after ,April• 13, '1961, .or • the reliminar at';was,,'a roved., a'fter,.z. ril .30 1969', o ,,,- �.,'�. .; 'P Y•.'Pl PP . P � �� r �, , 'I . . . :'`r (2)• I Sales of:lots' to purchasers''with reference `,to';the I • , ' ,'"'' � plat",.,:;or substantial, development',incident to platting'or';" • �� 'required''by the plat,,• occurred• prior to April ,1, 1971, and'' •',The developmentr,to,•be r made.without a permit meets all ' ' I; ;? _ ,requirements 'of the,applicable"State"agency• or local. government,i° • I' other than.,'requirements,,imposed::pursuant•,to-.this'.chapter„;;'' and . • • ' , , I •' ,;(4)4y, The ,development;�does• not::,involve construction of G .: ,. .:;`';; ••I•,• ' buildings',, or: involves construction; on•wetlands'of buildings ` ;"'' • "I' .'1 ,' to. serve only as:.community,.; 'social,,"or recreational. facilit-i® i• r ; al • ` for' the.use:of;.,owners:of'-platted, lots,,and' the' build'ings;:da: ;?' ,`'I exceed,,ir.height.•. y- feetab e,: g ;gr d , {: of;•thin five. above:,averse a e';'1'�yel` i;' � ' ; 'I ' • (5).`'r The development is ,completed.within: 1 years"after. ' 1. • r-..;.;il:' i .,' , • q" • thel'effective;'date' of• this' chapter.. „ . .- a • ;, ,; r, ' t Compliance..with the, of the' ac• . is. eq. : ' . • :','' t, required- of:,,all t'.'1` projegts,',I,:including those which do 'not 'requiret a .permit. • • . , tl '•�, y 't it . . , , I' Y I.. i F.�, , , , .. '11' iC III ,It,' • 'i AMD. '• WAC,'173-14-060 SCOPE OF PERMIT. The following, , follong, time re- '". uirements, shall apply' to all..substantial development permits "':• i and'permits for 'conditional use'and variance: '' • (l).'. 'Constructi,on or substantial, progress;toward'construc= ' •tion;'.•of,! a:project .for. which:.a Alas been granted ur`suant ' .i. • to.the' ;act;; must be`:undertaken."within two,:years after', the'ap- •' ' ' proval:,pf the permit'. by local,government' or the permit shall i ' • terminate,. • If', such progress')has .'m not beenade, a new permit rri s •. • Wllly�be,r fl@eHSSaIy,.' :`.' ' ' ..: '� ''. �.'.`,. ., ',.,• .�' ,.`,;.'�.` '�' 1 �^ ermit "has been' rant , • (2)' °If" a project' for;.which`;'a"p g ed` .1 . :`. • , pursuant,-to the act has not been'completed within five years •.'• .�- •' C after the approval of the permit .by local government;, the ` • • %'!• • • ,�.,;'c,:' • • local;'government,:that ,granted the ,permit shall; at the' expire- ;; ;:,r';, . L tionof,,r•the five- ear er od' •• • -y p i ,,'review the permit,• and upon;,a �: ' '� 'k ;' ,. showin ofr.,good cause,,,'Ida either. sif' the ,following: F':. :r;1 `•' ' (a:).,:;,Extend'••,the':permit,'for.one year;'. or.,: , , , 'r:'' , . (�7) ` Terminate. the 'permit, ;,' I; ,• �I�i ''�' °�•;F 1 r,fr'' , �7 p:"•' '' ' :NEW WAC.173--14-,062:. APPLICABILITY OF'PERMIT.SYSTEM TO',F ERAL 'r' _ '' '! (AGENCIES;; ,.The.:substantial•, development system shall be''applied, f; ,�;'r ': in'.the'„following`,manner to, federal agencies, On, lands meeting -the''.criteria of',,the, shoreline„management .act and•. the department 7'. for .shorelines of,the state. r j (I);,r;,,i,pederal:'agencies shallr;not be required. to.obtain 1 {'�,. '; '1 permits'a,:for 'substantial developments undertaken ,by the, federal<.. .�``,r ,(.government •on lands ,owned 'in ;fee'by,'the' federal government ,un- �" ' , II less `federal government._. grants„or reserves to. the, state or f 1', '••` loc overnm nt substa tial'. urisdic '�' , .,. ah;;.g e n ;j tion over activities on. , those''lands. ,,, i 11 . • • ,(2);; '.When ,and, if the Washington State.shoreline program. '' j,%° ; is approved' under• the coastal zone management,act, '16.p5c ' •;;- c<,• 'I 1451'. et seq.',,.the-federal-government •shall'.be subject .to, the i ; state`1shoreline:program,as;provided'' by,,the'coastal zone.manage- •,nient''act ,. - '• ti 1r •(3) The `substantial development permit ,system shall, ;apply ., ' i''' : to nonfederal;•activities''`constituting-'substanttial developments • ; 'i ,' ,, .•' •.;' :undertaken;'.;on _lands-'subject to; nonfederal ownership,;,lease or `': , . easement;''.even though'such'lands•':may'..fall Within the"'external'' , ' . boundariei3.of a�.•'federal ownership '.:,.:''.'. . ;..;.':' :. . .. .:... .: : . �. • '_('4)' The,asubstantiel:'development,'permit: system shall .;,`:' i.. apply to,.;'substantial':developments undertakeai':'on lands' notr:'fed- erally:owned',but under'.lease, 'easement,= license,'or' 'other., ',''.' Similar;',`feder:al',,property rights; short``of fee ownership, to.the` f- e`ra1. vex'ni ed E- �i,�41. V .I NEW; ' '. : ' r:'W .0 173-,14-064 :'REVISIONS.;IN;SUB•STANTIAL''DEVELOPMENT i '''..`,.PERMITS:..; Where,;,local''.government, seeks to 'reu se ''a substantial 'development' permit 'previously granted,:-'itJ shall 'submit' detailed .i plans;anti:;text.'"describing 'the propoaed changes "and.'request .in ,: " . .,writing : Of'.,the department and attorn'ey:general and"•latest• : .'• r cgrd.ed real"property owners within• 'four-''htiridred •feet of,`the boundary o£".the property on which the i:development" is,:to"be, ,; undertaken,whether•''they believe a"`iieii' substantial develop. ,,,.'" . '. .l, n • ). y 4, .,; ',,' '. ,... . ,.,`.' .: hermit.,should'•be 'required. "If:, withi ..,. ,. thirty, (30 da s,'•.of notification'•'the department';'' the"."attorney"general 'or"any' _ surrounding property owners. makewritten request that. ,a:,:new substantial development permit ,be obtained,.' then: application for''a. 'new substantial' development''permit: 'shall..be' made, nd processed..pursuant::to' Chapter 17,3-14 ,WAC e. '. : , •F` • . If';no'vsuch.`request 'is made,, local,'government'-inay 'revise l . , the' existingsubstantial'developmentpermit :and;"forward it. to rsuant:'t o �sctrient�'and'-:.'attozne eneral. for,.reUiew• ". , trie, d� a • piu p yg 'i CW 0 58':'140 5 and'`WAC` 173'-4.4-090. �R 9 f. )�; - ,-,'' o taent ' ermit'as,, re up'sted `'';- ,..•_`, . ': ' ' ere' no:,new'substantial"level p p q "pursuant to this sections';the' ,department;and the :`attorney' gen'- ,", [ eral may :release the`revised' permit_prior'to the expiration of the .fortyfive`. ('4,5);day`review period ;established, by RCW 90.58-: '. .;. .. -.';' „',•,. onclu's•ively 'shi.oei that.re .180(2)'';. where. the permittee has, ccli'' ' actioa�; avoid undue•.hardship on the.permittee,and .wher.e;'the public •interest will':not' suffer thereby.. , W C' 173-14-0:7.0?';:,. •••:„ NOTICE REQU,IRBD. Uponrece pt of `a' 'ps - er application .tor,: a' Shoreline''ii enageiiient substantial,,deivel'op '' •,:,' :'merit'_permit;, local_ •government'sl)a311 instruct'::the applicant` 'to::'', ` f' , ` "publish notices •thereof"at'least .Dice_ a' week', on the ,same day •' ' of.'the week;.for':two consecutive weeks' in a' newspaper of":general' .', f' . circulation- within-'the county;in. 'which -the development.' is, pro i' posedm+;:,In', addition.;",':the.applicant:-shall 'be instructed,"to;.post= -' a`:co '"or"„co pies;`'of,'<the,;notice.'on: a` conspicuous' place,::y:Cr' `'`'-'" ,. places`on'he" property';: and+to:mail copies .of' :the' notice' to` l the'"''latest:'record'ed` 'real property owners 'within four , • .,.hundred'"feet of the,.boundary. of !the "property 'upon,which :the : , ;,substantial• develo ment,,'is ro osed. ,. An' affidavit,recit•ing '•, P P p g .;.�. ;,i,,. ,, ,: ' •„i ''that,,:the 'notice,"';has been properly'''published', ,,posted and depos- . ited in the;:''U`,'S. ils''_pu'rsuant''to:.this 'section 'shall :•be :` ,; f" PP, . ,tr -. ed the•:a licant to:'the•:local' .go. g'-'3 o • Of i'the '. ":;`:.,:' 1, transma,tt by `' affixed,to.:,the: application, ', Within :'thirty' days' ('30)' of.`thy ' :final.;publication';''posting'or>•mailing of the •notice; ,whichever;'. Comes.. last, any.interested'person"may. submit .his'written •," ` �,' ; views'`:u n the •application,,'to.'"tine `'appropriate local• govern 1;'' merit..or:'.notify',the• local government of. his`desire to receive-:a. . '' co '..of. the';acti'on''taken.a n"',the".a lication. '•'All ersons• rho:' PX �, . Po PP P � • e( so submi't':;thei'r views;.'and all, others rho so'' notify the',•`appro- . priate•local ,government, shall'!be 'entitled.' to'• receive. a copy''or .' • .'-' ,'' :, ' the action, taken 'upon ,the 'appl'ication. •All' notices of.applica- , r . •I for :�ii a eme t" substanti'al ;deve• merit' ermits` '•t'ioris .��shi, •ii`e; an g n p f; b , `f o i'n form a • Shall� be, iri;�substant'ial'1 the.• 0l•1 w • , NOTICE-OF::•APP'LICATION FOR S HO REL JNE':MANAGEMENT' - .� � SUBSTANTIAL:`?DEVELOPP9ENT PERMIT I . CONDITIONAL: USE';PERMIT .OR VARIANCE +• JI: ''is heieky;:.g iv®n 'that� ' (state name ). ) .. ; -.. ''r •who''�is.,,(describe 'selatiti�isril�p•:to�':: roperty-�;�-'such'.:'as• Qwner'o- urchaser,'::`les see, etc.). 'of., th'e':below.,'described ro pert has"fileed'an a l'ication,' -. far;.,a+;:substantial development::permit for•..:the development'., describ 'development)••• . • • •• • 7 oc ated'''at .( ive:'•street:address, 'if:`known,,-:otherwise' , "` • ': .' iire••distance and:-direction to•.nearest, town).' _,,- • „. ••,., • ••'••','•'•'Twithin section •:of township� ' range W:W:M1q;' in (city or town)'•' ;., (county _ Was)iington. Said development is •propos"ed-. to •be ,within ,('name'•' n j. of ,water area) a d/• orl:,its 's asociated:• ` • • i wetlands..,.,,Any,'per son' desiring �to'''express his views or .•. • 1'; to;•bet:•notified':of,.the"action�taken,:on this application'' . "shotild :notify,`;'.'(name of ;local' government official) >,` • • ' ' in•writing o'f'' his: interest'"within thirty (30) days .o 'r:I ! ' ; • ,the last .,to occur.of the; following events ' ;:(1):.::The' last, date .'of. publication. of this, -in•, ,'' ' :a''• ewsp a er,•'of( general circulation within the' count y 'in; p P.. P. Y,' 1, I •,which .the development is':proposed';' , s :' (2)' -;'Posting of:this, notice on.the'property; or, (3) ; ,Mailing. of the notice to all,the latest recorded: '. real•`.property.owners:'within',400 feet of :the...boundary'•,of : the property upon which' the substantial:development is !' :proposed': • Publication dates and 'the newspaper(s) ••in ;which • 'this 'notice'was published are. "',! • ' The'-date' of.•posting of .this.'„notice is' i -The date of mailing this Inotice to adjacent property owners is t` ,. AMD ' WAC ;173-14=080' PUBLIC HEARINGS. ' governments may• ., ( ;{: ;i,• }' establish-,a,',mandatory or, optional::public hearing procedure,'.to i' •,i• • ,. . precede•r'the;issuance,,,or:denial 'Of permits in• order,to! allow , ;; ' . interested . ers n to resent'.their views: � P P AMD • WAC,-173=,1`4-'090`•''FIL'ING•'WITH.'DEPARTMENT, OF ECOLOGY AND d ATTORNEY GENERAL:;.;t•,Copies 'of t the: original application;;'the,' • ? ' environmental investi 'ations,:done: pursuant '.to either chapter '. ,;t1 • ' ,'i.' 90.58•, RCW ,or. chapter-43.21C 'RCW, the .permit or.exemption and E' ?' 'any other.written:evidence of;the final'order of local .govern- �: -merit relative:'to--',.the application ,shall,be filed with the: :!.. department ,of-ecology and attorney general by personal delivery, .'' or.'by certified ,.mail. within' eight days of the final decision. ' 1 • Filing';shall' not be-Complete'until the final order has actually r; ' • •, ;' been received•'by the,regional;1office of s, andthe department'within 4 whi• ch the proj•ect :lies by the attorney;'general:' _'• j.,lr. AMD'`• , WAC''173-14-100•• .JUDGMENT CRITERIA FOR` SUBSTANTIAL DEVEL- , OPMENT •PERMITS,. ;. (1)'': :Prior •to•.the effective'. date of an• 'appli- • ;;;. : :,_ ' cable ;.master program, a_'substantial ;development',permit 8ha11 '''• `;'':' ' 1 • be: ranted,,only .development propo sad.�is: t ;,.,. - with; • �., I, ;i. , 'Si '( 'a'il-,.; 4i' iil':: ' iyt%.1' I`•, ,•7,YI h ' ` ' fi ,1;� I t'•. ? i ;(';a1; •,The.,pol{i�cies 'and procedures ;of'ithe;,act'; ,; '.i.` ! (b):'' After I,their::ado:,;adoption.,....; 'r l4' .•a „•. r : „ "•,, p i' the 'guide'lines and ,reguA,0t4.oiis' ' , • of:. the department; - , i 1, ) ',, can -be;':ascertained ,, • .I; '' .' ''('c ,•. So. far''as.. ,,•thel master program' r ' ' ' • being'-developed: for the; area.;; and: ,,. ;: ' ., (.d); The policies and procedures of,,.the State Environmen- I • 1' tal ..Policy "Act. . ,•, ' (2) After'•the adoption;;~. a'; al', :I .; • ;'�' • ,adoption�or approval,' as •appropriate,:� by ` •I,I ` • ' , . • ,s'• the• department of 'an. applicable .master,'.'program a •substantial ? develq eiit' a s.. hall' b 1; ,'r piny :pp r,it'_S e';grantee.only,when} .the deyel;c),Prnent.t ''` '1' f' proposed','i's 'consistent 'with"WAC"17 :I t"'1 '±, , p3:-14,1004:1 ;:above,'and•.the r '1i •master,;pro•grain....adopted,or„approved.`;fOr',the:;,'area'': - ,` ''I' AMD, j;;, ' " AC.1.73=14Tl10.... APPLICATION'I•�''O&r;,.,SUHSTANTIAT.,; DEVELOPMENT '" PERMIT. 'Applications--for'a permit'.requiredr`by:-..RCW 90'.5S;:140(2) ' :.j'' hall' e i aatia'll the' followin orni' :1 '',u:;, 's 'kie,:;road®:, n'� eubst y:;,: g„ . Suc��'�orms ,;• • I. ' shall be;:•supplied:':by local::government. • ,i • '1:'•i' TO THE:„APPLICANT: This As 'an application•fors:a•substan't ,.,,, , '' ' 1 develo mient;':p ermit1•.a d ;is fall ,,'!''. ,,, • " - �: I P P n authorized` b 'the';ShorelineM,ai� ''r '� �� ,1, • J: inert Act of 1971. I Y '' ,7... ge-. ;.;i 4 • , , It:, suggested that.'you check with, the 'i' 1 f"'" . ; "•" • department.of ecology•and other appropriate local, state,;:?or . 1 •federal 'officials to determine.,,whetherl your;'project; falls;with- '° 1','•'• ":. ?' .1`' i, in,any other. permit;;systems,t rz-•' - ` 1,.. ;Name.'.of,,applicant; .:-..!,-:,'.. ; ' Mailing address• • ,. .,• .. - ,• •i.';r '' 3.. ' '',Relation,:of, o,applicant;t ,• ro•ert ,;: '"I .,; ;,," 6 'r' 1'' Purchaser, „l-1p Lessee ' . . I,. •I. • Other 1 " :4; ,Name ..and.:,;address of owner if`other)• ' '' , ap, . •,: : :;, ;^ ll.than 'a plicant:2•r';;'; ' 1' ;,`I • !. • ' i .. 5, c ' • Gen'e•a; •,location;'•of;• ro o^ r ' , . r 1'�; p p sed"-'project .:(give`��street,,.... '�.:.'' � 1'" , #':; ' address.�if`' known, •otherwise i '.,:;.';;;;Y...,..,': ;,. '�! q ve'^distance,' and•direction. It•' �,'+° I', , �; '' ' to nearest,town) . . t. ••.,j l; ,l',I' ti ',' a��aj,,l.'d'eSCL�. tt of prc erty ' (E etti C.,' t''7 4M,sn9, ,f 1 I,' ,'1 1' 'p, .'")•. lei' • • :.r"' '{,;;,;. ,:r' 'I'.:.: J1 • 7 'of,water• area.and/or wetlands',wit ., •. i '�'.i" 'is proposed: ,, ',within' which development Current of,,,the, rO ert 4 `with ,...1 `' ' II, • ., ., . ;,, ;.. ' P P Y''. existing improvements *�•,. ' , • • 9. Proposed.:useaofproperty .. ,',.c • : • 10. ;, Nature .of, the'i,existingr,shoreline ,,(Describe type, marine ` `♦ 1 C'. m' ,strea 'i.,,;lake,', -lagoon, marsh,:bog;;"„swamp;, flood plain': • .I.• ' • ' - _,, ' ' ''floodway:,; delta,;',type .of .beach, such .as''accretion;:'erosion i i-, ;'•'''.'',,,..',:, •1+ , l I . . , ,,`'lit J.'1' ! ..f';'- • - . . ... ;- ` . • hi ban: Low,.•bank;.;lay;";roc ,;:or dike °imateri.al:.suc] sand'' {..,'."`' ravel, 'mud, ck riprap'�'` and•`extent and y of • " • bulkhead'ing, 'if'.,any.., 1, . •, •, „ ' 11':, 'Proje'ct,diagrams Draw',all: site'•plans;and maps to scale, °a'' clearly indicating scale'`on lower. right hand corner.,and •J' t •41 ,„ " attach 'them,to,.',the`:application ' (a) ;SITE. PLAN. . Include on `plan: ' ' (1) Site ,boundary. - ; 4' • �; a'%i jr;'(2) •Pr..operty•dime.ns'ions:;in;vicinity;of, proj;ect�`r /3 rdina h h-water,:'mark' _ >' P :;: r'' ', t n land; o to r ei f'iwe'-foot nte'rvaY "`' .J' ' s ', ", '��; ,.w!..,(4)=' 'Ea�ie .i g n ,,c n u e,•:�•.u.t hq" �� e ,. . • •,, :' k :in water.,area and:!'';tez-.foot,intervals;}gn.',area landwar of; ordi 1` ' nary,;high-water mark. , • (5) ,Proposed land ,'contours,using five-foot intervals ' • .in water 'area and ten-foot intervals:.9n• 'areas landward. off' •.br f' • , dinary high-water,' mark, if development involves grading.,.' cut- •• .f ' J. . ting,''filling, or other .alteration*of land• contours. • ','• ', ' - " (6) Typical'lcross' section ,or sections showing: J '+ ' , _ (a)� :Existing ground elevations.. ' (b) Existing 'average grade level underneath '''' • ,• ••all proposed structures. ' , :' . ,' : •: •. +•' •• (c), Proposed ground .elevation. • :. . 'i" • ' +.. •• (d): . Height.of ,existing structures. ;: :` ' ' ;;, (e) Height :•of•proposedstructures. ;'. ..• 4i. ;',' /`'. '. •„ " I';",(7.):' Dimensions ,and' 'locations of existing''structures • '• ' which,,will, be;maintained.(8 Dimensions''and`'-locations. of': proposed. structures. ; t _R^ • ""('9)- ' 'Materials 'comprising' proposed fill or 'extras- , • I' t tion;z. f-any. , . ;,, ;'. II ; • ; .s ., .,f (10) ',amount. of 'fill :or::extraction.' (in',tons 'and_:Cubic' yards),. • ;,. ; .I (11) Location of, proposed utilities, such as' sewer, ' ' • ;{,;` septic'•tanks and' drainfields, water, gas,' electricity, , L I • , • ,('12) If .the development allows.•septic tanks., `depth' of • ,k' ;.~F'.the;water.•,table. 4,;' • iL', ;: • (13),.,. Shoreline designation':'according to ,master pro- # (•14) Show-,which., areas,are 'shorelines ,and which-are I shorelines•of`'state-wide••,-significance (if,any) ,;;: +„r, {; ' b -VICINITY MAP.' ,(1) . Indicate relation •of site to'4 adjacent`'lands and uses to•which they,.:are;put'.',for',.at least' = . ;:, one thousand feet, in all 'directions'. from' the development site. "' . (2). If'any of,the proposed structures will exceed 'a' height of y- ;i • } thirt five feet above the: existing average, grade" ;r '.t • ' ''level.,of',,the lane ,underneath it,.and,will obstruct in whole or in part':"the views'of,:the. shoreline', from any 'single,.or ,mu�.tipl family'='residential pr`opert y.,'•please:-draw` a` leas. 'radius• anc� 'a curve from',the proposed,,.structure,.o_ r structures extending the. full„ a; {'. length; of the'''line''of ,sight (this could,.well be,more than'' . ' one thousand feet) to all such properties and identify the number o residential uni,ts,::existing_.and ,potential .that will I have .obstructed views:' :i: , (3) If the development involves the removal of any soil _ " ' . • by, dredging or otherwise, please identify the proposed 'disposal " • ' site,•,on •the';map,:':,• ',:If the disposal site is ,beyond the confines ' • of the',Vicinity map, provide another vicinity map showing the ' r. +,. S` • i I' `i 9i I 1 ,I I, �I ty 'i, '"� ar t. ''i' of• the site�''and' its distance'to`,the-"ne es ,, �; ,�: : ;preci`se•:'location' � cit br';town. r, 1:• -named I ' the above e `.I� ,•:(Mull .name)' . . , ...,,.- am'' .. i applicant•;.for• a':permit.'.to, constr:uct a',substantial 'deVeiopment; � , , pursuant:to.chapter„:90.58 ;RCW,,.,,and. hereby state, that ,the,:fore- . , going'• statements',..answers,. and„information .are, in ala' :dre- • ' knowledge • '� spects•;�•tru,,e ,•and..correct..to.:ahe:best .of .my.knowled n 'b li f ;'� - I: •e e ,r` rl '�I ii 'I d J .Ir :"r;•ar;, • (Signature) '). r• .(Date '1.,:,, "}'iiJ �1r II ii :'' r:' never.`.a'develo r` .i W WPiC=173=•14—''1'1 S r LETTER10F'. EXEMPTION. •Whe P the, exem t°ions stated' iny`WACt'173-14--040,, the 4< : ,�,'.,� � �ment'"�a11s� withinp :i'' Yovernment"'shall'' '�re `are 'a�-letter 'addressed to jthe' 'appli-' I•i I'„'''I'' loca'1�'�g P P ++''":; ' t'arid' :the`'de"lartment'• exempting:;the.. development from; ',:.I,• �' r,y� can P :permit ,requirements of chapter 90'.58 RCW: 'This exempti:on, shall;l' ch forms•' • , be `in substantially the''=:following;'form:' 'S`is " supplied by,local government ' ' ' ' • • EXEMPTION PROM SHORELINE ' i,' '`1''MANAGEM$1VT-'ACT ''SUBSTANTIAL• DEVELOPMENT •PERMIT REQUIREMENT' • • name• nd. s a addres of :the .TO•, ( Theproposal by; (name' of'`applicant) to `under= i I1, take- :the following''develoI p men` t' ' ' •-0 (b, e •specific) p , - upon the following property, • ," . o , e section, township; 'and range)(.legal description,' , . ( and/or its associated within name of water area) wetlands' is exempt 'from the requirement of a substantial devel-',' Lii}" is o ent permit because the development• : ` . f ^i r{ i�' rl, 'P' `I N 'I' f E K'. I ii /4 - ' l 'f 1 . • i Iv ' ' f '. 'market,: aloe' 'o t•ar fair ''marke VI. -;'•f:'; Does:- �a •total 'c s • . `',:'"' ousa nd':'($1';000`:'00) do .11ars i. G , C' oim al ub 13 'th''the n erfer "wi r, `t 'materially •.irit e .}' '/ Does no Y� r a e. 'es ''of �tlie 'st t el'n hor �.' or` s � water the'i`'• 'use of i:' •,I ,• 's. constitutes~nor• mal' main• tenance or,r epee• `'of 'ex3'st I s, 'includin ,damage, byaccident;I:; es`or. develo ment g - i •s` 'fit._; tA': eme •. r ..• �:;: , ,,. ,,'<,.I ' ° fire :ol'. - - I.' al r c i i"t o to t 4• rm Const�i;tutee':constructiori o �tH p, 'I' �f'amil 'residences: y' bul'kYie�d`commo1r:to;°'single y;. ;�:..L,i'.:I, �,' ,a ,..,: Ie.. .. •.�•'' • •.' ' tor r: � " , ' /�" Con titutes 'emer'emergency construction. • tect property y• ,from`•damn e r• ments, h :. .1'•i:' fit:• T.'' .• • �_ ••r. 'or� si�ii1'ar' Constitutes' construction'`�of`.a .barn aricultural 'structure".on the wetlands. g •i� f cati f ,n a ruction"�' r:``modi i �) such,"a srchan.'`ncoenl's;Markers s 'aon d tor buoy o s` a9• 1 'r•S; • n .1. I�: • I I'• II + ile 7 f i' I. yl f ( rr , YI tl; �`1 I mot:, i1 .l. '1' rI ff • A 1 i' i 1" • 4 i• a • i T ,i - - - -.:,C li:, il'I r'r '}° ' ti t',rc/7, :Coristi,tute$"?'construct' • , ion on.wcttlan,as' hj an ,owner . ,. lessee:'or,.contract:purchaser'of''a::,single family residence: for ,;' • ,:, his own :Use,or.',for the use of° his' family,,,.whi.ch re nidence does . ' ' ,t ' 4', • 'not exceed,' a"height of thirty-five feet above aver zgc'„grade ''' - . level! ands which meets,all'. requirements. of':the state: ag'ericy.•'or.' ', ', .local,.government.having jurisdiction thereof:, Other''than' t . uirements im os n' rer' ;.r' ,.. ,` j � .,q p ed`:by;.this' chapter. '. ,.,• ,' , • 'G .., •"' • ,/7 Construction 'of.:'1.a'dock "designed 'forpleasure` i, S' • • , 'only,';'' for',the private noncommerci g s craft. ,; ,;;: ' '!, 'ii contract u al 'use ,of..the owner; ' Lessee �or4 ,•'{''i!'t' ' � ' p rchaser1..of, a, single•'family-residence, the cost of 1:''` � ;' rr'. ' ' which does not, exceed'two thousand 'five hundred dollars •_ 1• ' /7' Has received a. certification from .i , ,,. 1 ,• ' • ,the governort� • •. ,1. pursitanE to• chapter' 80.50' RCW'. :,,, • ,:' „ ' , ,,//,, 1o:' nci,uded-withina. reh • _ '� "' F ,r. �p itnnary •or. final.�.,pla,t• ; ' ' ' . ,i ,. approve_T,by..the' applicable; state,'agenc or •local overnm I` ,! - pr"ior; to April,. f: .. ,, Y.'. ..... • g.. ent ,:(1)1.:',•The '.'final+'piat' was approved 'after:April '14=;'':`'196`i,;'or '' ' .,1 the preliminary,,,plat„was ,approved„after. April 20, ,1969 or. ,.. a: • (2);••.,•Sales`,of lots, to purchasers, with reference., to.:,the 1,,' split,'' or substantial develo merit incident to platting or•;re I,;.` ' : quired•by,:the 'plat,`, occurred•;prior to April '1,' '197.1, • and ' , F ,, y: ;r; I ; • , •(.3) : `The development to be made without a':permit: meets `:' , ' � ' . 'all requirements'of the applicable state agency: or local • i, i' ' , ' i• government,, other •than 'requirements imposed, pursuant to this •'1 '': 1.` chapter;''and . „ "..,, :,,: : -. ; : „ _. •i 1': 14): .The development'does not involve construction of: , buildings, or involves construction on wetlands ,of buildin s ' `1 ' 4 „ ' ;, '1' • ;' ' to se'rve''only as 'community, .social, or recreational facilities :' _', I, 1' for the, use of„owners of-: platted lots' and the, buildings'do not .;• • ' ' • • ,k''i ; 'exceed a' height of thirty-five: feet,above, average grade: level, .,,;,;e,:•' ' and' . ' • ' • ;-,,,t . (5) ' The 'development. is `completed_ 'within two years after i,•,••;_; : . , t• ,'. the effective''date of this.chapter, ,' f. ;. !i' (Date)• Signature of Authorized ` • • :; , ;,, " ,Local 'Governmental Official , - • '` •WAG' `173 14' 12d SUBSTANTIAL DE�IELOPMENZ' PERNXTS " ''I' tial^development perms • issued• by -Ai Substan .t ` ,`, .,• • � • ' �,. '. is :.,local"government' pursuant L. , {, to, RCW''90.5$'.140(2) 'of the act, shall be in sub stantal'ly; the, �.'• �.� � , •.'follow ,rig!;'form: •Each:permit.shall ',cont` f `;, '' i, , ',, , “,contain. that. ',• '-��,;: ,1,: construction pursuant to'•;the':,per'mit -,fill'.not begin'' and is •."'" `I- ','0'" - not, authbYi•zed untill''forty-five• (45)', ',days ;from' the ' " • ' jt' 'date.;:df ' ' "';; • ',filing of''the', final order'by•'local government with the depart-'' • • ` II • ;ment' of 'ecolo •re ional :office 'and•the attorney: enera - •F, or until'.all' review' proceedings initiated'"within fort five' i' i ` ,, 4 such filingin. , ( 5) days' from the date of have. been terminated. .k • 'i i , ti , .•. .''.• SHORELINE,MANAGEMENT.;ACT',•OF:.1971` ' . '.. PERMIT.,FOR SHORELINE. MANAGEMENT,' SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT'•' F ' I - , 'f,' '1., ,t .. :a `• 11 ,1 (Consecutive: but ' NOTE THIS:;PAGE ,FOR it": „Application 'No'.; ' beginning with one) ' I • ' ' ' 1'. ' ' •,, ' . LOCAL GOVERNMENT' USE:'':':; , I ONLY ,? , Administering Agency.. ..-(city or;'county) ,j' ' ';, Date i'rec d , , , APProved,', i Denied • • _a , .i'. •. - ' • • , 1 . Date' , • Pursuant to RCW 9Q:58.1 '40(2) , a',permit is hereby granted 3to,,+ ' ,i (name "of•'applicant) ` to, undertake the: •following.'development,: '(be .specific) r, ' • • ' i i` , - '' _ ;..a ' ..1,:I?•: . .0:14 ... _ r ..r" I r , 'i: . ''' • •..n''it. ,i '1! bi . • , ' 'upon. the.. following'.property •,'(legal-description ire I :I;.section, 'township;' .range) , • ' ' ' ' The following provisions of the master program are applicable. ' " •'i,'; ' to this..:development , (state by, section or.page number) : , .Development',pursuant .'to: this,'permit,shall" be undertaken' pur- r ' sat' o:.t I u n t he fol' o ,1 win ,terms an o d:'c nd it'ons ' -. i g'. i ''' ' This permit 'is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Manage ;,,.,.•',• ' .- . ' 1', merit Act.'of•;;19,71'•','and• riothing: .in this permit Shall' excuse'the , ' ' I. „• applicant from.,.compliance• with any other, federal, state or • k ' • :' .' :!:, local statutes,i'ordinances Or regulations •'applicable to this ' ' ' " ' '' • project; but not consistent with the Shoreline Management Act: „ - • ' ,,F1., This •;permit,;may•be, rescinded;'pursuant,.to, RCW 90.58:•140(7) I', ,'s .. i . , in...thet,event the;,permittee,.fails•,.to;.comply with:the ',terms or • ' • , . conditions: hereof:;, ;I, , : - ,..'..,• '' , , i ;CONSTRUCTION• PURSUANT TO.•THIS PERMIT WILL' NOT. BEGIN,OR IS ,` F. r , • ' NOT AUTHORIZED.,UNTIL:FORTY-FIVE,,(45) DAYS FROM THE DATE,OF ''• , . , ' FILING.THE FINAL-ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE.,REGION- r i.' 'i ' AL.OFFICE.;,OF;TH$ DEPARTMENT 0P"1.ECOLOGY.,AND THE ATTORNEY GENER- -;), : AL, OR, UNTIL,ALL.;REVIEW;PROCEEDINGS•'INITIATED •WITHIN,FORTY-FIVE - . - DAYS,.FROM THE DATE OF•;SUCH.:FILING,HAVE TERMINATED. !,, ' ' :.' ., ' ,�, (Date) „ (Signature of Authorized' ,Local ' r• " ,. • . Government Official) , `t 10. ' „ • '111' 11 •.1. _ rl 2• ' - "' ..1 ,I, ' '-��� .a •:4 ..' - t_IhI:1:(r',J,'Si f.; ;' I;:��.y, n:�a°., i .,' t• i , la .. . ' y; NEW.' "WAC'•117,-..4-1130'1"PERMITS''}FOR CONDITIONAL USES AND '• VARI- �' • ' .' ANCES "."Pursuant';to''RCW;,90,58,100(5):, local 'goverriment•,'shall ' ' , ' have':the.:authority to issue'or'deny and ;submit to'the depart- ; , ment :for.approval'.or 'disapproval, 'permits ;for-variances and , ' conditional' uses after,"the•''adoption'''or approval of the master. • 'r,'' ..` •' ' r; program: •;;'Granting'-::and''aPProval..of 'a` permit'-,shallIoccur .only `'�; • C°,''E •;'' if 'extraordinary circumstances are shown and the public suffers i ;;, ,"";,., no' sub'stantial•'detrimental effect: ` The permit system estab- i' ^''' r'....• ' •lisbed;_b , local government for conditional uses and permits ; ri • 'shall conforrk•ttii_:the;'system''established ;Within- this regulation.: ;`,, ; ;, '�: ,. ,,} ,i) ;,tip :1,,`i, a _ ',r .c, ',. ., ,','• 1 NEW 'WAC 17i-14=140' '•CONDITIONAL• USE :The'.objective• of a con ditional- use-provision•.is to provide More control.and' flexi, .;• , bility. for intpleinenting ;the 'regulations of the master.program,. 'r` Wit'h.>prot'3.sions�, to;.control,•the'undesirable;i•effects ;the;°,'scope; • of, uses' within each of the four'e_nvir'onments ,can: be expanded" j : 'to include additional uses. . •. '; _Cond'itional:'�ise .permit's'.will:•be=.granted;: only ,if the appli- ,c'ant can.,satisfy, the.:criteria set:forth::•in WAC 173-14-130:-and the 'following: (•1).' ' The use''will''cause'no: significant- adverse effects On . • ' -• the environment or other uses,. ' r; (2) • The use will not interfere with public:use of public "' shorelines: - (3); ,'' Design of::the 'development will be'`'compatible~•with the'', surrounding and'the'master program. . • ' ,:. i.'.'. 1(4)„'-'The proposed~use will not be, contrary to the; •g, eneral : ' ' intent'of the master' program, = ' {NEW, ; WAC`173-1 • 4-150 'VARIANCES: A•variance ,deals with- speci- fic• requirements of- the master.program and its objective is to • :'; grant _r'elief when there are practical difficulties or, unneces-,' '; , • sary'-hardships in- the way ,of•icarrying out :'the 'strict :letter •of ! 'the 'Master program: A variance,will be granted only: after.:the, :k applicant _can•cdemonstrate' in addition to 'satisfying the ,ere-, ' • teria `set..forth'in:WAC'.173-14-130 the following: ;'.:'c; ', . • '�' (1): 'That; if he ,complies with: the provisions of-;the •,mas- . ;.` ' ':;,' ter program`he cannot make'any,'+.reasonable use .of 'his'.property. . ''`• The fact' that he`:might'make' a greater .profit'`by,using.;hu.S ,pro-. • • :perty:''i'n';,a 'manner'r;contrary to.the intent of the':program 'is 'not'. ' "a'`su'fficient''•reason fcr a .variance':. ,,• ,' ..•. � � •(2): .!That:the hardship results' from the application of the 'I. " ' ' • requirements;;of•'the-act 'and 'master''program,: and not;, .for 'exam # . ' :' ' ple'; from deed restriction Or the''applicant's own actions, (3).:; `That the :'variaylge granted will. be in harmony:with ,.the • , :general`:;.purpose.:and':.intent of;the master program. ,, That the'.public"welfare-'and interest will be pie- `' ,'+; ' ` served; if.more harm•'will be done to the' area by granting the ;' • • �` variance' than more be done to the applicant by denying-, it `' , • , the :variance will,.,be denied. • • ,' : WAC"'173-14-160 "AD •. MINISTF2ATION OF CONDITIOi4AI. USE AND ,. ' 'C. VARIANCE.'PERMIT SYSTEM.•I Except as 'otherwise provided'in 'this ' ' ' • regulation an .a licant;for a• ` } pp permit .for'•a conditional use • ').. • ."t. • or variance shall utilize the forms and follow the procedures : • : established by this regulation and local government for review-, ' ing, acting-upon ":and filing substantial development 'permits: I • • . NEW '' -'WAC 173-14=-1''70'.::PILZNG WITH LOCAL':'GOVERNMENT.: • •Conies of. the original application, permit, all environmental investiga• • 'tions.'done pursuant' to "chapter. 90.58 , RCW or• 4 3.21C RCta ,ant iii} • other•.:written evidence of, the final..•approval or• disapproval li}. ;;' a':'I;`. the'department shall„be filed:'with local government,by ,actual. delivery:to local government at the address listed on the per 1 • " NEW 's'WACr'173-14,7.180' PERMIT •FOR.-CONDITIONAL USE. OR VA ANCE: '' When .Local' 'government grants; or dense p i' ies a• Permit for a coed ' • I' tional,'.use' or variance, it shall attach to the application a ' • permit Which is in substantially the following form: . Each • , ,,.; permit shall include a provision:that, construction pursuant 'to the'permit will not begin,_.and is not authorized, until.thirty (30) days from.:the, date-the ;:final decision :by"the .department, of ' • " " ecology.:.is filed;with:,:local„government: I. „ I' " SHORELINE, MANAGEMENT: ACT OF 1971 q't., PERMIT FOR• (CHECK ONE' /1 CONDITIONAL USE , VARIANCE NOTE', 'THIS PAGE"FOR, Application No: - LOCALTGOVERNMENT • 'ONLY , - . : Local. government' . Address-of local • • ' government Date received` Approved Denied ' , Date Pursuant" to1'RCW1,90.58.100, 'a permit for a (conditional use';':ors'variance) . is hereby granted to (name • of "emir-cant) to undertake the following development (be `specific) :. • • upon;the following property (legal' description;. ' . i.e. ; section, township, and range) "The• "(conditional use or variance) "-' represents •a depar' '. j . •ture from the following section(s) of t e master program ', ,. Development' pursuant to 'this permit'shall he undertaken pursuant.,to the following terms and' conditions - • 14 12. • • • is i ''' This 'pe_-:_t"uisl'granted pursuant to'chaptci.'. 58 RCW And d •.s:'. ' • ' ' ,''+ ' ' , nothing in :this permit shall excuse the applicant from compli- •' ' i'.'•'!.. ance.•with any other, federal, state'-or local statutes:'�'. ordi- nances' ,or regulations applicable to this project. ,'"' This permit maybe rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58:140(7) ' . ' i'r:j,:', "•" `in the, event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. { ., CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO. THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR `,, '.,',, •' • ;% ' . • ; i' •IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY 's ,r4,• •1' ''FINAL' DECISION BY •THE DEPARTMENT 3OF'ECOLOGY OISM T FILED HE TWITH E E :It i; ' . 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT. „ ' ., 'gyp , ` �•, '. ;' 1.!- ' ' f ! , .� " i' ' ' , [ (Date) , .' : ` •I ' I • �.1 .+ ,;.:I.Fi ' (Signature of Authorized• r,I , 1L' ;;; , i';, ; ;' Local Governmental • ' ,' Official) . THIS SECTION FOR .• ,• • '•',: •, fi' DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY • i. rI.`' Date received by department of ecology ' •' Approved ' ' ' Denied „ . . , • .1 • •„ ' • .'..+ This permit is approved' by the,department of ecology •'I ' - r ail ' ' ,• pursuant to :chapter' 90.58 RCW.• • Development. shall be undertaken , ,,I, '' pursuant to the followingadditional terms and conditions: , � ins ,,,. ,� , 1' !; (Date)' I (Signature of , ' - ., g Authorized },, I. 11� ' Department of Ecology '' ' , .. ' Official) • ;NEW WAC 173-14-19 • '':1 0 -1 DEPARTMENT .OF ECOLOGY REVIEW. The depart- •'•,•, ', ment shall render its final decision ap • • proving or disapproving .:, ;? ;; , . : :: ;" a permit 'for a conditional use: or variance within thirty (30) • •,r: •••' ' ; -' ri: days of the filing by local government pursuant to WAC 173-14- ' " . 090. I ..1.. ;' ,NEW•: ,WAC ,173-14-200 REQUESTS FOR REVIEW. All' requests' fo ' ':'' .:I v,. ,w: of any',finalpermit decisionsreg0 or,'re=' . .�; ;•: ;�;•I;', •• wie • under, 8 •R ��p,.,�'''�` �'`` chapter 90.5 CW' and ,I . " � •' '';''';,, chapter 173-14 4'BWAC•are governed by the proceduresestablished . ,.1 .rr ? ' 90.58 1 ,I,'.”, , , ,{, ;' '13 P I r •I %. 1'', •�I/•_.:_; .-,;.,-_.. ;f �c-�' • .�IOiV �S ' ''CLERiVS`'OF W f n1 , I rl .-„ - r I - .r I l• ' f ,/ [ ,.. Irl',. 'h ,, g. ..wi55 mo11 i-ix h fA ',( • )] September 5, ,1974'. '. .. l "I: \\ 'I Iii.110• 11 fl' , ' .. • 6, .: ,'.,.;: ,i : '1.7(.`)Pa alee 4 x a ro, ►t- �, I ,. • .. • ,. • • r!' �Idd 114 • • • • f mIr'` I�r I W ri • • • • Honorable AveryGarrett, Ma or' r ,• ;:'k;;' City of''Renton t., ,,;: ' t. a ' .,', ,. ' . ..Municipal Building ,, r::= {',�;:'.; • r Renton Washington 98055 , `' • I!' r •;r Dear Ma or• Garrett.• • 1 • •'The Department has completed 'our 'official review of the;Rentoii• Shoreline ",, ,j..'• ''' ' 'Master Program.'I' We commend;..the .staff; and •the citizens who participated';;`. ,,:,`' ,i': ' •''in' its preparation.'; The.document;is well written and 'generally con-;,''.''' . `' sistent with, the Act and the Guidelines in providing.a 'sound,'management';' ",r: "r program. for' Renton's eighteen'miles. of shoreline' •1' .'' ' I " .l I'rl I. .1. �r I� ,,However, 'there are .three areas of theprogram that•'are''inconsistent-with..;' , • •' Pr g the Act and. the Guidelines. These three sections will require 'your:.,;t,'•.:.i:.',:.::..'I ' ' I;; ' reconsideration -and •subsequent change. before the. Department,;can approve'.'' " ;•'I�' '!, +`'1`-.,, .1 the Program:; ,_•Specifically,:-wer find the following..sections,to'.require • >I;°I•'.i'`'•' amendment to' meet .the intent'..of the..Act: • • 'I' is,: : ','1. The 'Regulations••'on'•Landfills , (page 58 7.08:O1A ,1` ''• r ,;:' The:regulations on 'landfills (Would authorize fill.to.;project' 50 ," • "' . feet. beyond the. ordinary high-water mark and fill 'an area of• 3'•500'. ..� i';,. square feet 'for: residential:purposes.. While, there may .be certain.,,; : !' ;::,.' ,: .•hardship•cases 'where. residential lots, cannot:.meet local development; " ,''`' ' . ,' standards,.stipulate& in subdivision; ,zoning,- or other`.codes, the r' ' : .. ..:'1::• shoreline .program 'is not intended to authorize filling for the purpose of creating conforming or,buildable lots. • Fill for' rest- f r '' :. dential purposes is in conflict with WAC '173-16-060(14)•,(d)'. . •''I: .., >; - Specifically,. landfills 'are not to be permitted below .the ordinary : •. :. : ;' high-water mark, except in '.specific intensely 'developed areas. for:', ', ' ' water-dependent uses. In certain: hardship cases, „residential • '' development requiring variation from strict;. adherence to regulations „ could be .accommodated..through a local variance rocedure. g P ,., '. • . 2., The Regulations on Piers and Docks (page 60, 7.112.03C) 1 I r . Docks up ;to'150 feet in .length:are permitted outright 'and..the .,',, • „ . Planning Commission, is authorized' to allow,docks 'of greater length..:`'.'. •.;, '., ; . . i While we would•not recommend a specific' restriction'•on 'dock•length;..,,':' '.' ...150 feet is considered excessive We recommend that•regulations be':• ;'•• _ ' . written, to allow a variation in permitted dock lengths',based on 1.1 •'.' ' • . : ', • • I:)II,I J.r. �Jv/`;! 'Icrl 1 ' y I I`nr�;'+.f.!ir.,:: _IynIF i�';aar'I :o �7,a,i fa none 1C;.)• ;; "�,:c I" ,, ..'.,...,•, I . . ,i,•::: . U-.:ILL _:I�..4 _ .1, 4,4:,i. w Page two j Letter to: Honorable Avery Garrett ,September 5, 1974 specific needs or uses of the development proposal, and dependent ,.. on depths of the water body at specific proposal locations. This . • revision' would implement your policy (2) on page 28 which states ' that "The length, width, !and 'height" of over-water structures should be limited to the smallest reasonable dimensions.". Other Lake ..'; Washington ,communities have restricted dock lengths to 70 or 80 :! , : .. feet. . 3. Authorization: for the Planning Commissidn. to Vary the Application' of Regulations, .hnd Use 'of Variances 'and Conditional Uses , ' . . •� Several sections of the program authorize the Planning 'Commission , ' to allow deviation from adherence to the regu1 . lations. . ,We would. recommend that these concerns beyaccommodated through .a variance. or j conditional use procedure as ",established in the Act [RCW 90.58 ' .100(5)] and the Guidelines (WAC, 173-16-070)b As the programis - - ., ,,, ,. 1. now written, 'the Planning Commission would be placed in the posi- ' tion of having to determine whether or not to apply shoreline ' . regulations; specifically,• Sections 7,04.02, 7.12.03C(2) , 7.12.06; ' and '7.08.O1F state that the Planning Commission may authorize " • development which does not meet standards and criteria inithe, ;. . I. existing program. This procedure tends "to weaken the program and ' , does not clarify the decision-making process, for the permit apply- ' • 1 cant, the developer, or the city; administering the program. In- a' ... similar procedural process, Section 5, Environments (p. 35),, . stipulates "Permitted Uses" and "Uses Permitted by Planning Com ', , ' . .. 1 • ` .mission." Since the Planning Commission is' the designated adminis- trator of all substantial .development permits, there is a need to " ' • clarify the distincttbn between those uses permitted outright and those permitted by the Planning Commission. We recommend that those titled "Uses Permitted.by 'Planning Commission" be designated, conditional uses and that the conditions under which these uses are 1 allowed be stipulated in the program. Also, we recommend that the . ' , program indicate that conditional uses and variances are to be • forwarded to the Department for approval or "denial. ' Procedure ' . 1 ' Section 90.58.090(1) RCW of the Act describes the procedures to be ' , followed by the Department and local government for this part of the , " Shoreline Management Master Program process: "(1) ' As to those segments of the master program relating tot• shorelines, they shall be approved by the department unless it ' , • 'determines that the submitted segments are not consistent with thel • policy of RCW 90.58."020 and the applicable guidelines. If approval is denied, the department shall state within"ninety days from the • ' , date .of submission in detail the precise facts upon, which that ' ' decision is based, and shall .submit to the local government suggested , b+ s, 1 ` Page three . Letter to: Honorable Avery Garrett , ' ' September 5, 1974 i ; modifications to the program to make it consistent with said policy ' • and guidelines. The local government shall have ninety days after , it receives recommendations from the,department to make modifi- , cations designed to eliminate the inconsistencies and to resubmit the program to the department for.approval. Any resubmitted program shall take effect when and in ,such form and content as is approved by the department." ' Staff Review Attachment • j • Staff review comments are attached under separate cover to the planning staff. These comments are expressed as staff concerns about certain technical aspects of the program. Generally, these recommendations can be accommodated during the updating process. They are not the basis for ' ' denial of the program. . If we can be of any assistance in this or any other shoreline-related ' matter, please contact Mr. D. Rodney Mack, Program Manager,lor Mr. Donald Peterson (753-6865 in Olympia) and we shall assist in whatever way we can. • " Sincerely, (Is: ."---2--- i r--`757-2777 . . . , Sohn A. Biggs Director . JAB:lt 090404 ' cc: Garry R. Kruger, Associate Planner • Renton Planning Department ' (with attached staff comments) I , ' Attachment t CITY OF RENTON I , RESOLUTION NO. 1912 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : Pursuant to the requirements of the . SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971, as amended, (Chapter 90 .58 RCW) the City hereby adopts tha-: certain "Shoreline Master Program" dated 3 )^.2 , 7 �' , a true copy thereof being attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as if fully set forth. All requirements of RCW 90..58 .080 et seg have been duly complied with and all of the provisions of said "Shoreline Master Program" having been duly approved by the City of Renton 's Shoreline Citizens Advisory Committee. SECTION II_ : The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of thisRRsolution , together with- a copy of the "Shoreline Master Program" to the Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington , for its consideration and approval. Upon such final approval, the provisions of said Master Program shall constitute use regulations for the various , affected shorelines located within the City of Renton and as further set forth in said "Shoreline Master Program". PASSED BY TIIE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of June , 1974 lie' ores AT—Rea . , ref re Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of Jun� , 1974 4A ry Garr t, Mayor Ap ve d as t f ) '/ ar . ie an, i y ttorney • • • • 'I • • • • ill " ,1 (ice pi• '4. 4 t. Jn '•� ,. • • a y.'... _ .. 1. :i Ili «. - .. • • • -g 1m1_• • - a ... .'d a .f J.1 . .k:', S,j T 6L: -.'.id`:1.,' ,' .,^:d •'i°e: i.. . -' -l.a ,,, ' ,, 0,c1 II , �. ~'1 .I ., . - J , 111 III .1 P_' f` •. .. .+ '- '.�aJ•_.. . •Ill'. ,i ,.- ~ .. r... r- 1 + ,j'y=,.,. i ,*,. .€i \_ • .. „ 2f f-' •a • , , , , al' . , ' . ill '.7. ••14. .. ; .. •- :fin.e.-,i 4:,' i, .._ •ati �;1'I ..+.. _. ,.. .• +'7 );f'§.7, Ill' - " .. • • ,q. "t' - s .. .. iI ., .\, �. ,.. .3.3 ; ifs.- . .-. - a.`.7..•. • • ill - • . • • - 4-5• ...1.,':' ,.. ..... - • ' • • .. .._ — ,' 'III .. ? � _..4 1i y J.e. '.. .. •4' . .,°'Yt './....,. •.1-1;•o_, a t 41• 1 1�, ,,+ uJ,_i 'J'1r"1 s .,. r.:r 9 : ... ....' f.. Ili I , , { III , - •- y , ii • "Renton City Council - • Minutes - 4/22/74 . ' '. OLD BUSINESS - Continued 6. i ` Gambling 'Revenue Finance Committee Chairman Schellert noted the 1974 Budget includes $19,000 anticipated revenue from bingo, raffles and etc. and feared - that unless ordinance waspassed by the City, revenue is jeopardized. City Attorney recalled history of legislation and noted that'1assuming no further changes made by the Legislature in the present mini, session, the City would have local 'option effective end of July or first week in August. Attorney advised Council to determine type of gambling and tax desired for timely implementation. Public Safety Chairman Delaurenti noted committee working on ordinance soon to be presented. . Finance 'Corpmittee Letter from Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schelle1rt ' ' Chairman Travel requested permission to attend the annual Municipal Finance Officers ' Request t Association Meeting in- Las Vegas, Nevada on June 2-6, 1974. ,,MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REQUEST OF FINANCE CHAIRMAN. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, MATTER OF ATTENDANCE AT MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION MEETINGk. IN'.LAS ` VEGAS BY FINANCE DIRECTOR! MARSHALL BE REFERRED TO THE FINANCrE, COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. : i Shoreline- Master jCommunity Services Committee .Chairman Grant noted review and' revisions Plan 'completed to the Shoreline Master Plan by the Citizens Advisory Com- mittee, 30-day public review:being observed which will end May 18. VOUCHERS Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman .Schellert recommended payment #2979-2990 Voided of Vouchers #2991 through 3215 in the amount of $116,693.06 (#2979 - ' ' 2991-3215 O. K. 'd 2990 Machine Voided). Vouchers received departmental certiii.cation that merchandise.and/or services received or rendered: MOVED. BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE; COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT. CARRIED. , Request for MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED ,BY BRUCE, REQUEST FOR STOP SIGN ON END OF Stop Sign INDEX AVE. N.E. BE REFERRED TO THE STREET COMMISSIONER. CA RIED. a Councilman Delaurenti asked Police patrol for S. 19th St. p st '. - Talbot School due to complaint of speeding cars. Councilman ,Stredicke asked Police check of drag racing on Union Ave. N.E. ORDINANCES ; I . ' First Reading - Councilman Stredicke presented ordinance for first reading relating Sewer Ordinance to Sewer charges. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, ORDINANCE Water Rate': BE PLACED ON FIRST -READING AND REFERRED BACK TO LEGISLATION1COMMITTEE. Ordinance . CARRIED. City Clerk read or'dinance.raising sewer rates as approved at public hearing. Councilman Stredicke presented ordinance relating , , ' to water charges, connection requirements, method for payment of metered water services. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, ORDIN- ANCE BE PLACED ON FIRST READING AND REFERRED BACK TO LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. , RESOLUTIONS Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented resolutilon for Resolution #1905 , transfer of funds from Cumulative Reserve Fund 2104 unto Park Fund Transfer of Funds in amount of $8,665.26 for the purpose of purchasing one Backhoe/ Park Department Loader, International Model .3400A. Following reading, it Was MOVED ,'j BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #1906 Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented resolution re 215-21151/4 Mill So. buildings known as 215 and 215 1/2 Mill Ave. S. , being substandard r Declared Surplus and no longer needed for any public use, same to be disposed of A1.1 , and removed. Following -reading by the Clerk, it was MOVED BY . ,`` , STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Meeting adjourned at 11 :55 p.m. ` , l.' _.. ! _ . cz. .. 06 ielores A. Mead, City le' k ! A RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 25 , 1974 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . MINUTES Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the Meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President, HENRY E. SCHELLERT, CHARLES COUNCIL DELAURENTI , GEORGE J. PERRY, RICHARD M. STREDICKE and WILLIAM J. GRANT. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, ABSENT COUNCILMAN KENNETH D. BRUCE BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance IN 'ATTENDANCE Director; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; SCOTT HASKINS, Legislative Aide; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; KENNETH WHITE, Personnel. Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; RICHARD GEISLER, Assistant Fire Chief; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; VIC TeGANTVOORT, Street Supt. ; VERN CHURCH, Purchasing Agent. MINUTES FOR Council President Clymer asked for additions or corrections to the APPROVAL minutes of February 11 , 1974. Councilman Stredicke inquired as to 2/11/74 intent of motion made by Schellert (page 1- Sian Ordinance) that 2/15/74 Community Services Committee Reoort; (which stated Ad Hoc Committee on Signs had completed review of the sign ordinance and made recom- mendations which will be presented to Council upon completion of typing in approximately two weeks), and the Sign Ordinance be referred to the Legislation Committee for review. Councilman Schellert advised intent is that Legislation Committee review material . Councilman Grant advised the Staff presently retyping the proposed ordinance for Legislation Committee review. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, .000NCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 11 , 1974 BE APPROVED AS PREPARED AND MAILED. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested correction to Minutes of February 15, 1974 Special Meeting, Mr. Ron Lindsey, rather than Mr. Les Lindsey, to be listed as Representative for the Service Station Operators. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 15, 1974 APPROVED AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. Public Hearing This being the date set and Public Notices having been published Proposed and posted as required by law, Mayor Garrett opened the Public Shoreline Hearing regarding the proposed Shoreline Master Program which was Master ; completed 12/17/73 by the Citizens Advisory Committee, chaired by Program Mr. Bob McBeth. Community Services Chairman Grant commended the Advisory Committee. Citizens Advisory Committee Chairman McBeth explained the program as a balanced over-view of the City' s shore- lines resulting from passage at 11/72 election of Initiative 43B, Shoreline Management Act of 1971 calling for local control of planning Proposed and management. McBeth outlined shoreline: Cedar River, Green River, Ordinance Lake Washington, portion of May Creek, portion of Springbrook Creek Regulating and Black River, totaling 18 miles; also outlining exemptions to the City's 18 Milts program which covers 20 year period. Community Services Chairman of Shoreline Grant advised no changes proposed. Community Services Committee Member Delaurenti commended Citizens Advisory Committee. Mr. Don Norman of Quendall Terminals commended Citizens Advisory Committee and Chairman McBeth. Mrs. Carol Parks , 5227 Ripley Lane N. , inquired re pre-existing use, McBeth explained grandfather clause allowing pre-existing structures and pre-existing use. Mr. Morris'' Kayford, Redmond, inquired re bulkhead and was advised of single family exemp- tion. Mr. H. E. Hurst, Milwaukee Road and Burlington Northern Rep- resentative, inquired re Black River area and was advised by McBeth of several governmental agencies for that area would each require permit and noted severe ristrictions on landfill . Acquaculture inquiries were made by Councilman Stredicke, Mrs . Parks and Mr. Robert Marshall , 2909 Mountain View Ave. N. , being advised by McBeth of restrictions in Lake Washington. City Attorney questioned restric- tions as to Airport development, McBeth advised intent is , to restrict Airport to present boundaries. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BYSTREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, SUBJECT MATTER OF SHORELINE MASTER! PROGRAM BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. , Renton CityXouncil Meetii Minutes of '/25/74 - Page CORRESPONDE 'CE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Claims for City Clerk Mead presented three Claims for Damages which had been Damages filed with her for tire damage by Miss Jeanine Kay Hyatt, for sewer back up by Mrs. Tina Chapman, and for auto hitting pole on S. 2nd by Mrs. Kathryn Sue Elfving. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES BE REFERRED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND INSUR- ANCE CARRIER. CARRIED. Surplus Equipment Letter from Purchasing Agent Church requested street light, radar Traffic plls and signal poles and traffic signal equipment, along with. five Back hoe pieces of equipment, be declared surplus by the City Council in Mower order to effect disposition. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY Grader DELAURENTI , COUNCIL CONCUR IN REQUEST OF PURCHASING AGENT AND REFER Tar Kettl - MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR PROPER RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Curb-bui 1li er Final Payme t Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended final payment Rainier El ctric of $7,293.43 to Rainier Electric Co. for work performed on N.E. Sun- C.A.G. 2061 -72 set Blvd. Project, accepting completion of the project as of, 2/11/74. Release o If after 30 days . no 'liens or claims ace f, , d ;against this project Retained ount and proof of payment of tax liabilities is received, payment of retained amount of $13,264.40 to contractor, recommended. MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. Police Officer's Letter from Renton Police Officer's Guild President Nibarger informed Guild re Council of disagreement between the City and Guild over several Agreement Articles of labor agreement, requesting collective bargaining. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Drainage Program Letter from King County Council , Public Works & Transportation for Green River . Committee Chairman Dave Mooney, recalled 1960 agreement between Valley Kind reunt..y and municipalities of Tukwila, Renton, Kent and Auburn with U.S . Soil Conservation Corp. , for improved drainage program for Green River Valley; that Black River pumping station was the first phase; that Soil Conservation people anxious re construction of channelling and called for municipalities to provide 110 acres of property as wetlands. Mr. Mooney requested March 7, meeting at City Hall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEET MARCH 7, TO DISCUSS DRAINAGE CHANNELS AS REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY COUNCILMAN. City Clerk read Resolution 1891 re ,Green River Watershed Drainage Plan. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mr. Phil Weston of Bonanza 88, 801 S. 3rd, presented letter from Renton Merchants Association recalling dates for downtown redevelop- Renton Merchants ment as November 1972 to November 1973 and listed as not yet com- Associati6 pleted : Underground utilities , overhead wiring not removed, pedes- & trian and street lights, luminaires , sidewalks, curbs and streets, Mr. Frank King adjustments , alleys. The letter asked for revised completion date, re CBD if penalties had been invoked, why contractors can work in other cities before completing Renton project; and stated goal of 100% building occupancy by 1975. Mr. Frank King, Central Business District Project Manager, reported project is progressing and cited restoration and repairs accomplished and underway, also noting delays due to unusually wet weather and receipt of damaged poles and fixtures. King noted phone and light companies needed to work together to re- move wires and urged expediting by phone company. King also noted shortage of trees and fittings and delays in deliveries; asking business firms notify him of specific scheduling requests re pole removal and street blockage; that completion date appeared to be May. Upon inquiry of penalty imposed, it was advised by City Attorney that contract contains liquidated damages provision. Mr. Weston suggested a letter be sent to Pacific Northwest Bell to speed up project; that the Burnett Ave. S. parking lot project be speeded up. MOVED BY GRANT, WITH SECOND BY DELAURENTI , MATTER OF MEETING WITH PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COM- MITTEE. CARRIED. PROCLAMATIOONS Proclamation of Mayor Garrett proclaimed the week of March 17, through DeMolay Week 24, 1974 as International DeMolay Week. Present to receive the certi- 3-17 to 2el. ficate were the following Councilors, Steward and Deacon: Karl Youells, Larry & Gerald Cluphf, Craig Daniel and Jeff Morris -Reade. i I 1 1 \ C r\C‘CI\ . I Affidavit of Publication �t) "`, r�t�,. • �c ) °"� ° ,1 ram. STATE OF WASHINGTON . c1'4 � v COUNTY OF KING ss• ®� , �� 0.RED 1 `'o c`ES oFF�C � Barbara Caxj na being first duly sworn on ` oath, deposes and says that she is the ch-t of e�-Gik of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That . said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, ' printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly I newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication' of said newspaper. That the Renton RecordfChronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King _._ ._ ' County; — • Shoreline plan ,.. Washington.That the annexed is a � -- oU oOF PI/BLC . prop, ordinance p ., 1. iimaz Chu • ,i, .. o Q ® HEREBY @MR ' as it was published in regular issues (and 31 fag 12giltE City (. M not in f ,1 Supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period f •7 fiiD Y cif February, , ER 8:00 p.m. OR f16D Council Chambers CO the Renton of IMO consecutive issues, commencing on the cmf Building, Renton, Washington 03ED ROD OnW place f.p0p blic I • ' hearing OD consider fop following: 15 day of F 7 , and ending the shoreline [;(rip s • posed Ordinance': Any M I p�: • er- day of , 19 ,both dates L E)Egg invited f f present OD Cd$sD approval, disapproval ce inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its • _opinions m lit:,;. subscribers during all of said period.That the full amount of the fee Chu C�. I 31 �,� , Delores a, charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 7® ? , which Published ii t1na giDIECM [;13. • has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words GOIXI&UM R fl/%6k'b Gig for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each ffi ° subsequent insertion. • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20 day of Feb• 19 74 011,-v_,:.t4., ,C -- , . - .Notary • . is in and for the State of Washington, i • ding at Renton,King County. • - PasSed by the Lr�gislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective { June 9th,1955. -. Western Union Telegraph Co.rules for counting words and figures, I addpted by the•newspapers of the State. . i ' ` \\ CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has , fixed the 25th day of February , 1974 , • at , 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Renton , Washington as the time and place' for a public hearing to consider the following : Shoreline Master Plan Proposed Ordinance • • Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , City lerk DATE OF PUBLICATION February 15, 1974 $ RAhruary 22, 1974 CERTIFICATION STATE OF WA,HINGTON) ss . COUNTY OF KING ) I hereby certify ;that three (3) copies of the above notice were posted by me lin three conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City Municipal Building, Re ton ,; d Washington on date of 4. / , 19 7 . Signed ATTEST : • Notary Public in and, for the State of Washington , residing at Renton. I , .. qI i ; RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 11 , 1974 Municipal Building Monday 8: 00 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the Meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President, HENRY E. SCHELLERT, CHARLES COUNCIL DELAURENTI , GEORGE J. PERRY, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KENNETH D. BRUCE 1 and WILLIAM J. GRANT. CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance IN ATTENDANCE Director; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; JACK LYNCH, Administrative Assistant; SCOTT HASKINS, Legislative Aide; GORDON ERICKSEN, Plan- ning Director; KENNETH WHITE, Personnel Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; RICHARD GEISLER, Assistant Fire Chief; VIC TeGANTVOORT, Street Supt. ; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director and VERN CHURCH, Purchasing Agent. MINUTES FOR Upon inquiry by Council President Clymer for corrections or addi- APPROVAL tions to the Council Minutes of 2/4/74, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE. SECONDED BY BRUCE, correction to Page 1 , L. ID. 282 Hearing, in motion by Stredicke, seconded by Bruce, remove the word "Proceed" and insert the word "Negotiate" , so that motion reads: Public Hearing be closed, that L. I .D. 282 be terminated and authorization given for Public Works Department to negotiate installation of, water main in Aberdeen Ave. N.E. between N.E. 27th and 28th, home owners bearing cost of materials ; also, Page 3, Parking on Burnett Ave. S. ,"Stredicke" name be removed in 15th line first paragraph "Clymer" inserted. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE. MINUTES AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. Special . Presentation Fireman Bruce Phillips introduced his daughter, Julie,and Stefanie Parkinson, Issaquah High School students observing City government. CORRESPONDENCE City Clerk presented February 7, bid opening for Orillia Sanitary Sewers, L. I .D. 273, reporting five bids received,(as shown on the Bid Opening attached tabulation) reporting Engineer's confirmation of bid L. I.D. 273 totals not yet completed. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, BID RESULTS BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE Mr. Eugene Robel , 3606 Meadow Ave. N. , presented proposed resolution COMMENT which urged the House of Representatives to vote to impeach Presi- ent Richard Nixon so that a full public hearing may be held. Mrs. Resolution Thorun Robel gave further information, along with Mr. Ray Campbell Request Re 114 S. 12th St. , Renton. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, Impeachment SUBJECT OF PROPOSED RESOLUTION REGARDING IMPEACHMENT BE REFERRED TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. Mr. Robel noted petition bearing 1 ,500 signatures delivered to Mr. Joel Pritchard, U.S. Congressman. MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Grant presented committee Shoreline Master report recommended Public Hearing, Monday, February 25, 1974 on Plan; - 2/25/74 the Shoreline Master Plan. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY Public Hearing STREDICKE, CITY COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Sign Ordinance Community Services Committee report stated the Ad Hoc Committee on Signs completed review of the Sign Ordinance and made recommenda- tions and will be presented to Council upon completion of typing in approximately two weeks. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT AND SIGN ORDINANCE BE REFERRED TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. 1973 Edition Public Safety Committee Chairman Delaurenti presented committee Fire Code report recommended adoption of the 1973 Edition of they Uniform Fire Code and that the matter be referred to the Legislation Commi- ttee. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , COUNCIL CONCUR I IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AND REFER MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. l Renton City Council Meeting h Minute, of 2/11/74 - Page 2 OLD BU; INESS - Continued Aviation Committee on Committees Chairman Perry presented committee report Committee that a new Aviation Committee of the City Council be formed of the Council with the following powers and duties: (1 ) The Committeelon Aviation shall consist of three members, including a Chairman; (2) This Committee shall be primarily concerned with and supervise all matters relating to the Renton Municipal Airport, including but not limited to negotiating leases and recommending execution of same'llto City Council ; establishing rules and regulations for the operations and management of Renton Municipal Airport consistent with FAA rules and regulations and state statutes; maintain a current Master Plan to properly establish controls for public and private development of aviation facilities. The committee report also recommended that Councilmen Bruce, Schellert, and Stredicke be members of.lthe Council Committee on Aviation, with Stredicke serving as 'IIChairman; and that this matter be referred to the Legislation Committee. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR INOMMITTE ON COMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION AND REFER MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, UNIFORMITY OF NO LID Sick L-ave SICK LEAVE ACCUMULATION FOR ALL CITY EMPLOYEES BE REFERRED Accumulation TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 1 Senior itizens Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Administrative Assistant Lynch Nutrit on reported the Senior Citizens Nutrition Program starting' date planned for latter part of month, equipment items needed for Sartori site and that plans are progressing. 1 Public teervice Council President Clymer aubmitted letter from Mr.Gary Grant, Presi- & Public Safety dent of the Public Service and Public Safety Employees, Local #674, Employes advising that a peti.t.ion.had been filed by that local with the Local .74 Department of Labor & Industries 1/9/74 representing City', supervisory employees and department heads; that a notification was given to the Mayor by phone that date, notice was forwarded to. him by Dept. of Labor & Industries on 1/22/74. The letter cited Aviation Board actions as concerned Airport Director, Del Bennett, cautioning Mayor, Council & Aviation Bd. that discrimination against the members for Union activities is a violation of Sate Law; that a hear* by the Department of Labor and Industries forthcoming; that interference with the rights of employees to freely select a bargaining repres- entative is an unfair labor practice, assuring that members of the City Council and Airport Board desirous of freedom of cho-ce among City employees. New Des gn of Council President Clymer presented letter from Planning Director Signs or CBD Ericksen (1/21/74 Referral ) re design and placement of one hour parking signs in the downtown area presenting sign design. MOVED 1 Hr. ' .rking BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, DESIGNSBE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPOR- TATION COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. 1. Public Disclosure City Councilmen objected to Renton newspaper article of Sunday, of Per •nnel 2/10/74 regarding personnel matters and Airport Board, cTaiming Matter violation to the City's new Rules and Decorum Ordinance in disclos- ure of information from Executive Session. Councilmen noted mis- information given in article. Gas Staoions Following discussion on the unavailability of gasoline and discrimi- and nation by gas station operators by requiring credit cards etc. , it Gasoli - was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, MATTER OF DISCRIMINATION BY Situation GAS STATIONS BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. '1 Further discussion ensued, flag system, closed stations, travel lanes blocked due to line-ups, etc. , MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TELEGRAM BE SENT TO SENATOR JACKSON. Perry asked objection be made to forced closing of independent operators, citing example of Spears in Highlands. -MOTION CARRIED. II Legal MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BE BRUCE, BILLING FOR CITY'S LEGAL PUBLICA- Public.tions TIONS BE CLARIFIED AS FOLLOWS: $2.51 per column inch on first inser- tion and $2.10 per column inch on second and subsequent publications, 8 point type. MOTION CARRIED. ,'0 ., "COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT .:, , • FEBRUARY 11, 197.4 ' ' t, ITEM .l.e ;':'SHORE LINE MASTER PLAN- re c �mmends that 'a. :ublic 5 , , ,, ;i,':The:':Community Services Committee e o p , ,, _ , hearing be held on.'. Monday, February 25 ; 1974" on ;the: (�4,, �� ,v 1 i-' '' Shoreline;`Master Plan.. The ,Committee has' reviewed the , n, J'1 ,,'•:;;.plan,:',and' wishes. to have any public input' before acting , ; .1-f'''1,' , ,. ;.upon 'it ,• ''� `- '. ITEM 2;: ' AD HOC COMMITTEE :ON SIGN 'CODE ORDINANCE e. ,Ad Hoc- Committeeon .Signs has completed its reviewtiof `''''' : ," •; ; ,•,,;�the Sign .:Ord'inance. and has' made recommendations. :,The ordinanc ;will be; presented to Council upon completion of • typing in approximately two weeks . .1. . 1_ ;':Chairman William . Grant _ � S 1+' . . l' - t 1 1 '. Charles•, .Jf elaurent6 ',ivy • .. ; /.i . ,.:, , .'2'"..::....',..,'.;,,: l.Kenn�� - 1. . WJGem Renton City Council Meeting Minutes of 2/4/74 - Page 3 OLD BUSINESS - CONTINUED Parking Transportation Committee report on the proposed parking lot on Burnett Ave. S. Burnett Ave. S. between S. 3rd and S. 4th Streets reported Public Hearing 1/29 and previous meetings with downtown business representa- tives •and concluded that the plan was acceptable solution to 'parking problems in the area and recommended Council concurrence. Report also noted the Planning Department to develop a landscape plan which will be installed when funding is available. Perry noted Planning Department estimated cost of planter bed preparation and landscaping costs for Burnett Ave. S. from S. 2nd to S. 4th was $33!243, and recommended that the matter of funds for landscaping be referred to the Finance and Personnel Committee. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE,, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT ACCEPTING PARKING PLAN, THAT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND MATTER OF FUNDS FOR LANDSCAPING BE REFERRED TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL Parking - Burnett COMMITTEE.. Stredicke suggested City develop nursery for, landscaping Continued '• and Park needs. MOTION CARRIED. • Channelization Transportation Committee report recommended the Public Works Depart- Logan Ave. N. ment proceed with revisions to the traffic channelization at the &' N. 3rd St. intersection of Logan Ave. N. and N. Third St. with mandatory right turn lane and second lane with right turn, if desired, from Logan N. onto N. Third St. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR. , CARRIED. Coriittee on Committee on Committees Chairman Perry reported the manner of manage- Committees Rpt. ment on five other airports in the area, possible creation of Airport Committee under study. Gasoline Councilman Stredicke requested check be made on gasoline storage tanks Storage Tanks 1 at closed stations to determine whether or not Fire Code restrictions were being met. Mayor Garrett requested Asst. Fire Chief Geisler investigate.. Councilman Grant noted review of Uniform Fire Code, would welcome oil storage information. Shoreline MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THAT THE MATTER OF THE COMMERCIAL Management ZONIING EAST OF FAI 405 AT MAY CREEK BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CARRIED. VOUCHERS Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schellert submitted committee 1321 - 1364 Void report recommending payment of Vouchers No. 1365 through No. 1450 1365 - 1450 O.K.'d in the total amount of $85,617.62, Voucher No. 1429 having been voided 1429 - Voided ($48.33) . Vouchers received departmental certification as to receipt L. I.D. #279 and/or rendering of merchandise and service. Vouchers No. 1321 through Revenue - 4 1364 were machine voided in processing by the Data Processing Dept. Cash 4 Committee report recommended approval of L. I.D. 279 Revenue Warrant #4 in amount of $6,932.47 and Cash Warrant #4 in amount of $6,932.47 MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ORDIINANCES AND Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented an ordinance which RESOLUTIONS was placed on first reading 1/28/74 relating to escaped prisoners recommending second and final readings. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED Ordinance 2825 BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. Escaped Prisoners Following reading of ordinance amending penal code declaring gross misdemeanor aiding escape, attempting escape, escape or ,concealment from custody, it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS READ. Roll Call , ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented fourordinances Adoption of updating Title IV adopting 1973 Edition of the Uniform Building Code 1973 Edition and Standards, Uniform Housing Code, Uniform Mechanical !Code and Uniform Bldg. Uniform Plumbing Code. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE ORDI- Code & Standards NANCES BE PLACED ON FIRST READING. CARRIED. City Clerk Mead read Mechanical the ordinance adopting the 1973 Edition of Uniform Building Code and Housing Uniform Building Standards, Clerk read the ordinance adopting the Plumbing Codes 1973 Edition of Uniform Housing Code, Clerk read the ordinance adopt- ing the 1973 Edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code, and also read the ordinance adopting the 1973 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code and re-adopting Part I (Administration) of the Uniform Plumbing Code 1970 Edition (deleting Sections 1 .2 and 1 .3 of Part I ) , with revised fee schedule for plumbing permits. Councilman Perry asked rate schedules be distributed to Councilmen. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, ORDINANCES BE REFERRED BACK TO LEGISLATION COM- MTTTFc 7nR nNF WFFV rAP'?TFD, Renton City Co ncil Meeting Minutes of 2/A 74 - Page 4 RESOLUTIONS First Reading Legislation Chairman presented ordinance regulating the use and False Alarm installation of privately owned burglar and/or robbery alarm systems, defining false alarms, prescribing penalties, authorizing certain installations within the Police Department and restricting the use of certain outside audible alarms, and recommended first reading. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Following reading by the Clerk, it was MOVED BY STREDI!CKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE. CARRIED. I Resolution 18°'2 Legislation Chairman presented a resolution authorizing the execution Puget Power and delivery of a contract with Puget Sound Power and Light Co. for Municipal Pu p furnishing municipal pumping power for 10-years for sewage lifti at N.E. Sunset station located at 132nd Ave. S.E./Union Ave. N.E. and Sunset Highway, and Union N. and recommended reading adoption. Following by k, it was MOVEDB SCHELLRTSECONDEDBY BRUCERSOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution 1 :'3 Legislation -Committee Chairman Stredicke presented resolution re- SR-515 affirming support and assistance for the construction of proposed Relocated Be son SR-515 and said right-of-way of a major arterial through the City, urging the Washington State Department of Highways to proceed, Total Proje with the City Clerk to forward same to Transportation Committee of Sen- Supported b ate,House and other public officials. Clerk Mead read resolution re City SR-515,relocated Benson Highway/Talbot Rd. to Grady Way, planned' for completion by 1977, proposed SR-515 from Grady Way to S. 2nd onl, through the City's industrial area with final connection to FAI 405 at or near the North Renton Interchange, which is being urged by City to alleviate anticipated traffic problems with four-lane major !arterial ending at Grady Way. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR. CARRIED. Perry asked copies be sent A.W.C. Resolution 1 ;94 Legislation Chairman presented resolution transferring $2,500 from Transfer of funds Cumulative Reserve Fund #1894 to Account No. 011/514.50.23 for the Relocation 1 .D. purpose of relocating departmental Police communication equipment. Communications Following reading of the resolution by the Clerk, it was MOVEDIBY Equipment SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. CARRIED. Cable TV MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, SUBJECT MATTER OF CABLE TV BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE TO MEET WITH CLEARVIEW CABLE TV COMPANY AND OTHERS INTERESTED FOR DISCUSSION. Perry asked re franchise areas and availability of service within those areas. MOTION CARRIED. Use of Right of MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, MOVE THAT THE MATTER OF ISE OF Way at PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BY PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT AT GRADY WAY AND Grady Way PUGET DRIVE BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED, MOVED BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN'. ADJOURNMENT CARRIED. Meeting adjourned at 10:45, p.m. /6iptIA- Delores �A. ea , ity Clerk �` r" . - � ,' December 17 , 1973 The Honorable Avery Garrett Mayor, City of Renton Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 Renton City Council Rentori Municipal Building . ' 200 Mill Avenue South Rentori, Washington 98055 - RE : Renton Shorelines Citizens Advisory Committee • Presentation of Master Program Dear Mayor Garrett and Members of the Renton City Council : I Enclosed herein please find the final "Preliminary" \,_ , h Master Program which was adopted by the Renton Shorelines . Citizens Advisory Committee at its final meeting held ' Thursday , December 13 , 1973 . l The Citizens Advisory Committee has expended an jextraordinary amount of time and effort in- developing this Master Program within the time limitations placed upon, us . - The Committee has been meeting regularly since July 24', 1973 , in an effort to formulate a comprehensive master program to regulate---,the -use and future development of all shorelines lying within the corporate limits of the City of Renton, We feel that the enclosed Mastel- Program provides a rational , comprehensive plan designed to regulate the future use and development of our shorelines and that it repriesents a fair and equitable balancing of all. of the competing uses • which desire access to our ' shorelines . • We submit this Master Program to you in hopes that you will find it worthy of adoption by the City Council. We would be available to participate in further discussion on this vital piece of - legislation and will be available to ' answer any questions you might have . Ver tryly yours , -,---- -1-4(4( --ejr:/----4"---- . 14-6,04) c r--_,,.A/ . 0 ART E. McBETH 1 1' Chairman , CAC C`1r v.., 1, ��,.� `!J J GOALS AND POLICIES Renton Shoreline Citizens Advisory Committee Public Meeting October 2 , 1973 7 : 30 p .m. , Council Chambers Renton Municipal Building Robert E . McBeth, Chairman Arthur D . Scholes , Vice Chairman Sharon Neglay , Secretary Robert Bignold Alex Cugini , Jr . William C . Goddard Dorothy Herbert Don Humble Robert J . Phelps W. Stewart Pope Robert W. Schalkle PRELIMINARY GOALS AND POLICIES RENTON SHORELINE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONSERVATION ELEMENT i 1 GOAL The resources and amenities of all shorelines situated in the City of Renton are to be pro- tected and preserved for use and enjoyment by present and future generations . POLICIES : 1. Existing natural resources should be conserved. ! I a) . Water quality and water flow should be maintained at a level to permit recreational use , provide a suitable habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life and to satisfy other required human needs. b) . Aquatic habitats and spawning grounds should be protected, improved and, if feasible , increased. c) . Wildlife habitats should be protected, improved and, if feasible, increased. ! d) . Unique natural areas should be designated and maintained as open space for passive forms of recreation. Access and use should' be restricted if necessary for the conservation of these areas . 2 . Existing and future activities on all shore- lines within the City of Renton should be] designed to minimize adverse effects on the environment. 3. The City of Renton should take aggressive action with responsible governmental agencies to assure that the discharges from all drainage basins are considered an integal part of shoreline planning. a) . Soil erosion and sedimentation which adversely affect any shoreline within the Cityiof Renton should be prevented or controlled whenever possible. b) . The contamination of existing watercourses should be discouraged. 4. Shoreline areas having historical , cultural, educational or scientific value should be identified and protected. a) . Public and private cooperation should be encouraged in site preservation and protection. � I b) . Suspected or newly discovered sites should be kept free from intrusions for a reasonable i I '."':time until their value is determined. 1 5. Festivals and temporary uses involving public interest and not substantially or permanently impairing water quality, water flow or unique and fragile areas may be permitted. 6 . All further development of the shorelines of, May Creek should be compatible with the existing natural state of the shoreline. a) Low density development should be encouraged to the extent that such development would permit and provide for the continuation of the existing natural character of the shoreline. I. b) . The existing waterway of May Creek should be left in an undeveloped natural state as much as possible. ECONOMIC ELEMENT GOAL Existing economic uses and activities on the shorelines are to be recognized and economic uses or activities that are water related are to be encouraged. POLICIES : 1. ' Economic uses and activities which are not water related should be discouraged. In those instances where such uses or activities are per- mitted, reasonable public access to and along the; water's edge should be provided. 2.. Future economic uses and activities should utilize the shoreline in an efficient manner. ' a) . Economic uses and activities should minimize and cluster that water-related portion of their . .development along the shoreline and place inland all facilities which do not require a waters , edge location. "b) . The length, width, and height of over-water .: . structures should be limited to the smallest reasonable dimensions . c) . Shoreline developments should be designed to enhance the scenic view. 3.' :"Mul.tiple-use of economic developments on the shoreline should be encouraged to provide public recreational opportunities wherever feasible. 4 . Shoreline facilities for the moorage and servicing of boats and other vessels should be limited to commercial, industrial and recreational opportunities wherever feasible. a) . Commercial dockings and marinas shall meet all health standards . b) . Marinas and other economic activities shall be required to contain and clean up spills or discharges of pollutants associated with boating activities . 5. The expansion of log raft storage on Lake Washington should be discouraged. 6. Containment and cleanup of pollutants shall be required of all economic activities on the shorelines . PUBLIC ACCESS ELEMENT GOAL: Increase public accessibility to shorelines while preserving or improving the natural amenities. ' POLCIIES : 1. Public access to and along the water's edge should be consistent with public safety and preservation/ conservation of the natural amenities . 2 . Regulated public access to and along the water' s edge should be available throughout publicly owned shoreline areas . 3. Public access should recognize and be consistent with private property rights . 4 . Public access to the shoreline corridor (including the trail system) from public streets shall be made available over public property or sought by easement. 5 . Future developments shall be required to provide regulated public access along the water' s edge. 6 . Private access to the shoreline corridor shall not be denied. 7. When making extensive modifications or extensions to existing structures , developers should be encouraged to provide for public access to and along the water' s edge if physically feasible. 8. Views of the shoreline and water from shoreline and upland areas should be preserved and enhanced. Enhancement of views shall not be construed to mean excessive removal of vegetation. 9 . both passive and active public areas shall be designed and provided. 10 . In order to encourage public use of the shoreline corridor, public parking shall be provided at frequent locations. 11. Preservation or improvement of the natural amenities shall be a basic consideration in the Ii design of shoreline areas to which public access II is provided, including the trail system. CORRIDOR: A strip of land forming a passageway between two otherwise separate parts. AMENITY : Attractive or desirable features , as of a place , climate, etc. PUBLIC ACCESS : A means of h p ysical approach to and along the shoreline available to the general public. Public )Access may also include visual approach:- RECREATION ELEMENT GOAL: Water related recreational activities available to the public are to be encouraged. POLICIES : 1. Water related recreational activities should b encouraged. a) . Accessibility to the water's edge should be improved. b) . Shoreline park areas should be increased Ili size and number. c) . Areas for recreation of special interest should be developed. d) . Both passi ve ve and active recreational areas shall be provided. 2. Recreational fishing should be supported, main tained and increased. 3. The public should be encouraged to buy shorelard as it becomes available for sale based upon an established plan. 4. Local jurisdictions should join in a cooperative effort to expand recreational opportunities through programs of acquisition, development and maintenance of waterfront areas . i 5. Subject to state and federal regulations , the water' s depth may be changed to foster recreational aspects . RECREATION: The refreshment of body and mind through forms of play , amusement or relaxation. The recreational experiences may be active such as boating, fishing, swimming, or the experience may be passive such as enjoying the natural beauty of the shoreline or its wildlife. CIRCULATION ELEMENT ' GOAL Minimize future motor vehicular traffic and encourage pedestrian traffic within the shorelines . POLICIES : 1. Shoreline roadways should be scenic boulevards where possible and should be restricted to existing rights-of-way. 2 . Public transportation should be encouraged to facilitate access to shoreline recreation areas. 3. Pedestrian and bicycle pathways , including pro- visions for maintenance , operation and security, should be developed. a) . Access points to and along the shoreline should be linked by pedestrian and bicycle pathways . b) . Separate pedestrian and bicycle pathways should be included in new or expanded bridges or scenic boulevards within the shorelines . c) . Separate pedestrian and bicycle pathways should be included in publicly financed transportation systems or rights-of-way , consistent with public interest and safety. 4. Commercial boating operations , other than marinas , should be discouraged, but if permitted, should be limited to commercial and industrial areas . RESIDENTI L ELEMENT GOAL : Existing residential uses are to be recognized , but future residential development should optimize regulated public access to and along the shorelines , consistent with private; property rights . POLICIES : 1 . Re -idential uses over water shall not be permitted. 2 . Residential development should be discouraged in unique and i fragile areas . 3 . Ne residential developments along or impinging upon the shoreline should be permitted only where sanitary sewer facilities are available . 4 . Multi-family structures near the shoreline should be reasonably set ack from the water ' s edge to permit regulated public I' acclss to and along the water ' s edge . 5 . Fut!iplannedre shoreline. sub-division and unit developments (P . U. D . ) should permit regulated public access to and along 1 the water ' s edge . I 6 . Low density development should be encouraged in future resi- ' dential developments along the shoreline . ,! 7 . New residential developments should optimize utilization of ope space areas . 8 . All further development of the shorelines of May Creek should be dompatible with the existing natural state of the shoreline . a) Low density development should be encouraged to the extent that such development would permit and provide for the continuation of the existing natural character of the shoreline . I 1 b) The existing waterway of May Creek should be left in Ian undeveloped natural state as much as possible . UNIQUE AND FRAGILE AREAS : Those portions of the shoreline which (1) contain or substantially contribute to the maintenance of endaigered or valuable forms of life; and (2) have unstable or potentially hazardous topographic , geologic or hydrologic fea- tures (such as steep slopes , marshes) . SUBDIVISION : Subdivisions of land into two or more parcels . PLANKED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Special contractual agreement between the developer and a governmental body governing development of land PUBLIIC ACCESS : A means of physical approach to and along the ; shorjine available to the general public . Public access may, alsolinclude visual approach . I SHORELINE USES AND ACTIVITIES ELEMENT GOALS : SHORELINES OF THE CITY ARE TO BE PLANNED AND COORDINATED TO AFFORD BEST: USE OF THE LIMITED WATER RESOURCE . SHORELINES OF THE CITY ARE TO PROVIDE NATURAL AMENITIES WITHIN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. POLICIES : 1 . Reasonable and appropriate shoreline uses and activities should be planned for . a) Short-term economic gain or convenience in development should be evaluated in relationship to potential long-term effects on the shoreline . b) Preference should be given to those uses or activities which enhance the natural amenities of the shorelines and which depend on a shorelines location or provide public access to the shorelines . c) Planning, zoning, capital improvements and other policy and regulatory standards should not increase the den- sity or intensity of shoreline uses or activities except on a demonstrated need considering the shorelines and then only in accordance with the policies contained herein . d) Shorelines particularly suited for a specific approp- riate water-dependent use or activity should be planned for and designated . e) Multiple-use of shorelines should be planned where loca- tion and integration of compatible uses or activities are feasible . f) Aesthetic considerations should be encouraged when con- templating new development , extensive redevelopment of existing facilities or for general enhancement of shore- line areas . 2 . Those shoreline uses or activities which are not water-related should be encouraged to relocate away from the shoreline . MULTIPLE-USE : The combining of compatible uses within one development . The major use or activity must be water-related. NATURAL AMENITY : An assemblage of natural elements such as climate , land, and water as well as plant and animal life which leads to feelings of comfort , pleasure , or joy . MEMORANDUM Date July 31, 1973 To: Mr. G. M. Shellan, City- Attorney / Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director F rom: Del Mead, City Clerk Subject: Ordinance No. 2789 - Shoreline Management City Code 4-2300, 4-2400 It has come to my attention that the Shoreline Management Ordinance, adopted while I was on vacation, amends the City Code, particularly, Title IV, Sec. 4-2501 through 18 being added. There is, however, no Section 2300 or 2400 in the present Code and it would therefore be necessary that this Ordinance reflect Sec. 4-2300 to 4-2318 unless there have been additional ordinances adopted in the meantime containing those referenced Sections which have been omitted. Please advise. cr-2 Thank you. I 1__)2e , 7j Del CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. q2 7 FV AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON IMPLEMENTING THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971; REGULATING SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE SHORELINES OF THE CITY OF RENTON BY REQUIRING PERMITS, APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING; ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ISSUING PERMITS; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL, FOR ANY VIOLATIONS THEREOF.. SECTION 4-2501: Title and Purpose 4-2502 : Definitions 4-2503 : Policy 4-2504: Substantial Development Permits 4-2505 : Exemptions 4-2506: Variances and Conditional Uses 4-2507: Review of Application 4-2508 : Application of Permit System to Development Undertaken Prior to June 1, 1971 4-2509: Time Requirements for Permits 4-2510: Rulings to State 4-2511: Enforcement 4-2512: Rescission of Permits 4-2513 : Appeals 4-2514: Real Property Assessment 4-2515 : Master Program Formulation 4-2516 : Penalties 4-2517: Severability 4-2518 : Effective Date I " _ 2 _ i I 4-2501: TITLE AND PURPOSE 1. Title. This, Ordinance shall be hereinafter known as the "Renton I , , Shoreline Management Ordinance, " may be cited as such, and will I I be hereinafter referred to as "this Ordinance" and same shall be and constitute Chapter 25, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No.. 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City 'of . Renton. " I I , 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to implement the SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 (Chapter 286, Laws of 1971, 1st Ex. Sess. ) and to regulate developments on the shorelines of the City of Renton in a manner consistent with the policies and aims promulgated in Section 2 of said Act, which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. ' it II . , I I . I I li ' I { II . .I I I it I 4-2502i DEFINITIONS -3- For the purpose of this Ordinance , certain terms , phrases , words and their derivatives shall be construed as specified in this section. Words used in t 1 singular include the plural , and the plural the singular . The wrd "shall" is mandatory; the word "may" is permissive. 1 . Building Director. The Building Director of the City of Renton or his designated and authorized representative . 2 . Citizen's Advisory Committee . The group of citizens appointed by the 'Mayor with the concurrence of the City Council ' s Community Services Committee to assist in the formulation of the Master Program. 3 . Conditional Use. A use , or the expansion of a use , beyond the uses conte plated in a particular environment or environments subject to specific conditions to insure that there is no conflict with the intent of the environment or environments . 4 . Development . A use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures ; dredging , drilling , dumping , filling , removal of any sand, gravel or minerals ; bulkheading , driving or piling, placing of obstruc- tions , or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which inter- feres with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this Ordinance at any state of water level . 5 . Director. The Director of Planning of the City of Renton or his duly designated and authorized representatives . 6. Master Program. The comprehensive shoreline use plan for the City of Renton , and the use regulations , together with maps , diagrams , charts , orother descriptive material and texts , a statement of proposed desired goals and standards to develop in accordance with the policies promulgated in Section 2 of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 . 7. Ordinary High Water Mark. The mark on all lakes and streams that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presen and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years , as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that o the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1 , 1971 , or as it may naturally change thereafter. 8 . Person. An individual , partnership , corporation , association, organizati, cooperative , public or municipal corporation , or agency of the state of local governmental unit however designated . g. Shorelines . All of the water areas of the City , including reservoirs , an( - 'f - their; associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them; except A. Shorelines of state-wide significance . B. Shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is twenty (20) cubic feet per second or less and the wet- lands associated with such upstream segments; C. Shorelines on lakes less than twenty (20) acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes. 10 . Shorelines of Statewide Significance. Those shorelines desc.ribediin Sec- tion 3 of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. 11. Shorelines of the City. The total of all "Shorelines" and shorelines of state-wide significances' within the City. 12 . Substantial Development. Any development of which the total cost, or fair market value exceeds one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the City; except that the following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this Ordinance. A. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements; B. Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single family residences; C. Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements; D. Construction of a barn or similar agricultural structure on wetlands; E. Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys; F. Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the City other than requirements imposed pursuant to this Ordinance . 1 3 . Substantial Development Permit. The Shoreline Management substantial development permit provided for in Section 14 of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. (RCW 90.58.140). 14 • Variance. An alteration of the use regulations of the master program of the City of Renton. 15 . Wetlands or Wetland Areas. Those lands extending landward for two hundred feet (200') in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; and all marshes, bogs, swamps, floodways, river - 5 - deltas, and flood plains associated with the streams and lakes which are subject to the provisions of this Ordinance; the same to be designated as to location by the Department of Ecology. / - 6 - 4-2503: POLICY In case of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions and terms of this Ordinance and the aforementioned State Act, the latter shall be controlling. 4-2504: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS 1. Application Forms and Fees. No substantial development shall be undertaken on shorelines of the City without first obtaining a "substantial development permit" from the Director. Applications for such permits shall be made on ' forms and in a procedure prescribed by the Director, shall be made by the property owner, or his authorized agent, lessee, contract purchaser, or ' other person entitled to possession of the property, and except for applica- 1 tions filed by or on behalf of the City or other governmental agencies, shall be accompanied by a receipt issued by the Director of Financing showing payment of the applicable fees which are hereby imposed as follows: FEE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT $ 25 Less than $10,000 $ 50 $10,000 but less than $50,0100 $ 75 $50,000 to $100,000 $100 More than $100,000 2. Compliance of Application. Upon receipt of the application Director shall cause the application to be investigated and determination made as to its conformance with the standards of this Ordinance. 3. Publishing and Posting. The applicant shall cause to be published notices thereof once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaperiof general circulation in the area where said development is proposed; provided, however, that the Director shall have the right to require additional publications by the applicant in a newspaper of general circulation in a neighboring jurisdiction if it appears that the proposed project may affect the environment of such neighboring jurisdiction. Three (3) copies of the notice shall be posted prominently on the property concerned and in con— spicuous public places within three hundred (300) feet thereof_. Each said notice shall include a statement that any person desiring to present his views to the Director with regard to said application may do so in writing to said Director and any person interested in the Director's action on an application for a permit may submit his views in writing or notify the Director in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days from the last date of publication of such notice. Such notification or submission of views to the Director shall entitle said persons to a copy of; the action taken on the application. The applicant shall submit proof of publication to the Director within ten (10) days after the last date of publication. An affidavit of publication by the newspaper shall be sufficient. - 8 - 4. Review Guidelines. Unless excepted by the provisions of this Ordinance, no substantial development permit and no other permit shall be granted unless the proposed development is consistent with: 1. The policy aims of this Ordinance and the Shoreline Management Act of 1971; 2. The guidelines and regulations as issued by the Department, of Ecology and as same may be amended from time to time; 3. General compliance with the master program of the City of Renton or as same may be amended from time to time. 5. Burden of Proof on Applicant. The burden of proving that the proposed sub- stantial development is consistent with the criteria which must be met before a permit is granted shall be on the applicant. 6. Conditional Approval. The Director may attach to such permit any terms or conditions regarding the location, character and other features of the proposed structures or use as may be deemed necessary and reasonable to carry out the spirit and purpose of this Ordinance, in the public interest, and in compliance with the City's ordinances, regulations and codes. 7. Notification of City Departments. It shall be the duty of the Director to timely furnish copies of all applications and actions taken by the Director unto the City's Building Director and Clerk, and such other officials or departments whose jurisdiction may extend to all or any part of the proposed development. 8. Bonds. The Director may, in special circumstances, require the applicant to post a bond in favor of the City of Renton to assure full compliance with any terms and conditions imposed by the Director on any substantial development permit. Said bond shall be in an amount to reasonably assure the City that any deferred improvement will be carried out within the time stipulated. - 9 - 4-2505 : EXEMPTIONS The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this Ordinance: 1. Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW; 2. Any development on Shorelines of the City included within a preliminary or final plat approved by the City prior to April 1, 1971, if: A. The final plat was approved after April 13, 1961, or the preliminary plat was approved after April 30, 1969; or B. Sales of lots to purchasers with reference to the plat, or substantial development incident to platting or required by the plat, occurred prior to April 1, 1971; and C. The development to be made without a permit meets all requirements of the City, other than requirements imposed pursuant to this Ordinance; and D. The development does not involve construction of buildings, or involves construction on wetlands of buildings to serve only as community, social, or recreational facilities for the use of owners of platted lots and the buildings do not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above average grade level; and E. The development is completed by June 1, 1973. 3. Any person claiming exemption from the permit requirements of this Ordinance as a result of the exemptions specified in this Section may make application therefor to the Director for such exemption forms in the manner prescribed by the Director. - 10 - 4-2506: VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USES The granting of variances and conditional use permits may be allowed after the approval or adoption by the City of its master program or any segment thereof, but such approval or adoption shall not be unnecessarily delayed by the City. 1.' Variances. Substantial development permits may be granted which are at variance with the criteria herein established before a permit is granted where, owing to special conditions pertaining to a specific piece of property, the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria would cause undue and unnecessary hardship. No such variance shall be granted 'unless the Director of Planning finds: A. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property or to the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. B. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. C. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on shorelines in the same vicinity. D. The variance permit will not adversely affect the master program developed or being developed for the City. E. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will • be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each ,property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development does not conflict with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and the provisions of this Ordinance. 2. Conditional Use. A "conditional use" permit may be granted subject to the following conditions:. • ' A. The use will meet such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. B. The use will cause no unreasonable adverse effect on the environment or other uses. C. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. D. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's master program. E. The use will not be contrary to the general intent of the City';s master program. - 11. - 4-2507: REVIEW OF APPLICATION 1. Review Criteria. The Director of Planning shall review an application for a permit based on the following: A. The application; B. The environmental impact statement, if one is required; C. Written comments from interested persons; D. Information and comment from other City departments affected; E. Independent study of the Department of Planning of the City; F. Evidence presented at a public hearing, should the Director decide that it would be in the public interest to hold a public hearing. The Director • shall have powers to prescribe rules and regulations for such hearings. 2. Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to furnish information and data in addition to that contained or required in the application forms prescribed. Unless anadequate environmental statement has previously been prepared for the proposed development by another agency, the Director shall cause to be prepared such a statement., prior to granting a permit, when the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 would require such a statement. 3. Administrative Standards. In addition to the criteria hereinabove set forth in this Section, the Director may from time to time promulgate additional standards or criteria in connection with any application for a permit and such standards and criteria shall become effective, when reduced to writing, . and filed with the City Clerk and as approved by the Department of Ecology. - 12 - 4-2508: APPLICATION OF THE PERMIT SYSTEM TO DEVELOPMENT UNDERTAKEN PRIOR TO JUNE 1, 1971 1. Permit Required. Substantial development undertaken on the shorelines of the City, prior to June 1, 1971,shall not require a permit except under the following circumstances: A. Where the activity was unlawful prior to June 1, 1971; B. Where there has been an unreasonable period of dormancy in the project between its inception and June 1, 1971; C. Where the development is not completed prior to June 1, 1973; D. Where development occurred prior to June 1, 1971, on a shoreline and continued on to a different lake, river or tributary after June 1, 1971, a permit shall be required for the substantial development undertaken after June 1, 1971. 2. Phasing. Substantial development undertaken prior to June 1, 1971, shall not continue without a permit unto other phases that were not an integral part of the development being followed at the time construction commenced. , 1 , 1 42509: TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS 1 The following time requirements shall apply to all substantial development permits: : .1.. ,Permit Valid. Construction or substantial progress-toward construction of . 'a project for which a permit has been granted purShant to this 0Idinance must be undertaken within two -(2),.years after the' approval of th permit by r • .the City, or the permit shall terminate. If 'such'progress has not been ' ; • made, a new permit shall be necessary. ' ' ' ' ' • 2. Complete Construction. No permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than two (2) years. If the' proj'ect•for which a permit has ' been granted has not been completed within two (2) years after the approval _ I ' ' of the permit, the Director shall, upon such expiration, review the permit and upon a showing of good cause:may extend the permit for a period up to one • (1) year, otherwise said permit shall terminate; provided, however, that I no permit shall be extended unless. the applicant has requested such review and extention prior to the expiration date of said'•permit. ; • 3. 'Review Period. No construction pursuant to such permit shall begin or be I ' L . authorized and no building, grading or other construction permit"s or use permits shall be issued by the. Director 'until forty-five (45) days from 1 the date of final approval and 'grant 'of the permit, or until all review proceedings are terminated if such proceedings were initiated within t forty-five (45) days of the date ,of, final approval by the Director. ' �4-251U: RULINGS TO STATE • .. . • ;Any"ruling on an application for a .substantia.l development permit under authority ;of this Ordinance, whether it be an•approval or denial, shall concurrently with ' • , ;the, transmittal of the ruling to the applica•nt', be filed with the Department Iof 'Ecology and the Attorney General by the 'Director. ; • ' , , 4-2511: ENFORCEMENT , 'All provisions of .this Ordinance sna.:Ll be enforced by the',Director of Building, ;and/or his designated representatives. " For such purposes the Building Director ior. his duly authorized representative shall have the power of a police officer. '' I 4-2509 TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS ' I . The following time requirements shall apply to all substantial development • permits. • ,. .,`l."' Permit Valid. Construction or substantial progress toward construction of 1, `, .a project for which a permit has been granted pursuant to this O dinance must be undertaken within two (2) years after, the approval of the permit by the City, or the permit shall terminate If such progress has not been .'made, a new permit shall be 'ne'cessary. 2. :. Complete Construction. No permit authorizing construction shall extend for "a' term of more than two (2) years. If the project 1or which a permit has :,been granted has not been completed within two (2) years after the approval ,;of the permit, the Director shall, upon„such expiration, review the permit and .upon a showing of good cause may extend the permit for a period up to . one (1) year, otherwise said permit shall' terminate; 'provided, however, that ' no permit shall be extended unless 'the applicant, has requested such review , and extention prior to the expiration date of said 'permit. 3,6 ;' Review Period. No construction pursuant to such permit shall begin or be ' authorized and no building, grading or other construction' permits or use 'permits shall be issued by the ,Director' until forty-five •(45) days from the date of final approval and grant of the permit, or until all review .proceedings are terminated if such proceedings were initiated within ,forty-five (45) days of the date of final approval by. the Director. • 4-2510: RULINGS TO STATE ' Any ruling on an application for a substantial development permit under authority o•f"this Ordinance, whether it be an approval or denial,' shall concurrently with !the transmittal of the ruling to the appLu ant, be filed with the Department of,. Ecology and the Attorney General by the 'Director. 4-2511 ENFORCEMENT ' 'All provisions of .this Ordinance 'steal • be enforced by the Director of Building, 'and/or his designated representatives. For 'such purposes' the Building Director or his duly authorized representative shall have the ,power.'of a police officer. _...,.c._»,f's�— -.�':..D'+i+"t✓. ., ...._.. _ - - ss .-(S.' n`�.' 1A9 �`•`°�'r• -:+-��" i„ _;2f:•:c:..�'� .-r'.,,,�„ �.... ._ _ - - 14 - 4-2512: RESCISSION OF PERMITS 1. Non-compliance with Permit. Any substantial development permit issued by the City under the terms of this Ordinance may be rescinded or suspended by the Building Director of the City upon a finding that a permittee has not complied with conditions of the permit. 2. Notice of Non-compliance. Such rescission and/or modification of an issued permit shall be initiated by serving written notice of non-compliance on the permittee which notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address listed on the application, or to such other address as the applicant or permittee may have advised the City; or such notice may be served on the applicant or permittee in person or his agent in the same manner as service of Summons as provided by law., 3. Posting. In addition to such notice, the4 Director shall cause to have such notice posted in three (3) public places of which one (1) posting shall be at or within the area described in the permit. 4. Public Hearing. Before any such permit can be rescinded or modified, a public hearing shall be held by the Director unless waived by the permittee no sooner than ten (10) days following the service of notice upon the permittee. The Director may recess or continue such hearing and publically announce the time and place of such continued hearing in which case no further notice shall be required. The Director shall have the power to prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct of hearings before him; and also to issue summons for, and compel the appearance of witnesses, and to preserve order. The privilege of cross-examination of witnesses shall be accorded all in- terested persons or their counsel in accordance with the rules of the . Director. When the Director renders a decision, he shall make and enter written findings from the record and conclusions thereof which support his decision and the findings and conclusions shall set forth the manner in which the decision is consistent with the criteria set forth in Section 2-504 of this Ordinance. 5. Final Decision. The decision of the Director shall be the final decision of the City on all applications and the Director shall render a written decision and transmit copies of his decision as hereinabove stated, including the Department of Ecology, the Attorney General's office, the applicant, and such other departments or boards of the City as are affected thereby and the legislative body of the City. - 15 - 4-2513: APPEALS Any person aggrieved by the granting or denying of a substantial development permit on shorelines of the City, or by the rescinding of a permit pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance, may seek review from the Shorelines Hearing Board by filing a request for the same within thirty (30) days of receipt of the final order, and by concurrently filing copies of his request with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office as provided iri Section 18 (1) of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. A copy of any such appeal notice shall likewise be filed with the Director and the City Clerk of the City of Renton. 4-2514: REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT All the restrictions imposed by this Ordinance shall be duly considered by the King County assessor in determining and establishing the fair market value of such affected property. 4-2515 : MASTER PROGRAM FORMULATION 1. General . The City shall formulate the Master Program as required by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 . 2 . Citizen' s Advisory Committee . In order to assist in the formulation of such a Master Program, the Mayor shall appoint , with the concur- ' rence of the City Council ' s Community Service Committee , a Citizen ' s Advisory Committee to consist of seven (-v-) members for said purpose . The membership shall consist of a cross-section of interested and SIX knowledgeable persons . Fe -r (4 ) members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum to conduct business and make recommendations but a majority of those present shall be required to make any recommendations . The Citizen ' s Advisory Committee shall hold meetings at least once a month at the City Hall in the City of Renton. All meetings shall be open to the public . The committee shall take all necessary steps , including studies and investigations , to assist in the formulation of a Master Program as required by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 . All of the Committee ' s recommendations shall be in writing and submitted to the Director . The Committee is likewise author- ized to hold public hearings from time to time in order to achieve - the maximum of public involvement in the formulation of the Master Program. - 16 - 4-2516: PENALTIES 1. Prosecution. Any person found to have wilfully engaged in activities on the City's shorelines in violation of this ordinance or the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 or in violation of the City's master program, rules or regulations adopted pursuant thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the City jail for not more than ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. 2. Injunction. The City Attorney may bring such injunctive, declaratory or other actions, as are necessary to insure that no uses are made of the shorelines within the City in conflict with the provisions and programs of this Ordinance or the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and to otherwise enforce provisions of this Ordinance and the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. 3. Public and Private Redress. Any person subject to the regulatory program of this Ordinance who violates any provision of this Ordinance or the pro- visions of a permit issued pursuant thereto shall be liable for all damages to public or private property arising from such violation, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to such violation. The City Attorney may bring suit for damages under this subsection on behalf of the City. Private persons shall have the right to bring suit for damages under this subsection on their own behalf and on behalf of all persons similarly situated. If liability has been established for the cost of re- storing an area affected by violation, the Court shall make provision to assure that restoration will be accomplished within a reasonable time at the expense of the violator. In addition to such relief, including monetary damages, the court in its discretion may award attorneys' fees and costs of the suit to the prevailing party. - 17 - 4-2517 : SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circum- stance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or legality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. 4-2518: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after its publication, unless otherwise provided for hereinabove. • PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , 19 Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF , 19 Avery Garrett, Mayor Approved as to form: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Date of Publication: RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting July 9,' 1973 Monday, 8 00 P.M. Municipal Building Council Chambers MINUTES FLAG SALUTE AND Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called CALL TO ORDER the Renton City Council Meeting to Order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; WILLIAM J. GRANT, KENNETH, D. BRUCE, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, GEORGE J. PERRY, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, HENRY E. SCHELLERT. CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; GWEN MARSHALL, IN ATTENDANCE Finance Director; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; WES CREWS, Acting Building Director; VIC TEGANTVOORT, Street Superintendent; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; GENE COULON, Park Director; DEL BENNETT, Airport Director; and CAPTAIN JAMES BOURASA, Police Department. MINUTE APPROVAL There being no corrections or additions to the Council Minutes of July 2, 7/2/73 1973, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL MINUTES BE APPROVED AS PREPARED AND MAILED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and publish, Shoreline as required by law, Mayor Garrett declared open the Public Hearing on the Management Shoreline Management Ordinance. Chairman Perry of the Legislation Com- Ordinance mittee presented report of the Committee recommending that the ordinance regulating developments on the shorelines of the City of Renton by requir ing permits and approval by the Director of Planning be placed on first reading. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE TO PLACE THE ORDINANCE ON, FIRST READING. Legislation Committee Chairman Perry explained that the Committee had . made a change in the ordinance increasing the membership of the Board from seven to eleven, feeling being that there should be more citizen participation. Councilman Stredicke objected to the Committee changing the ordinance from the previous recommendations of the Council, feeling that any changes should be done by an amendment to the ordinance. After some additional discussion, the MOTION CARRIED. The Deputy City Clerk read the ordinance. Mayor Garrett asked Planning Director Ericksen to make a presentation. Mr. Ericksen explained that this ordinance was drawn up pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, Initiative 43B which was approved by the voters. The ordinance establishes certain procedures for processing permits and formalizes some of the procedures that have already been established, providing for penalties for violation Since Renton has approximately fifteen miles of shoreline within the City Limits, encompassing Lake Washington, Green River, Cedar River, Black Riv May Creek and Springbrook Creek, this being a very valuable asset to the City, it was felt necessary to pass legislation to protect them. The State Department of Ecology established the boundaries of the creeks and rivers in the City by the determination based on the mean annual flow of twenty cubic feet per second. The Planning Director will have the admini strative power and the Building Director will have the power to enforce compliance. No fee schedule has been established at this time. Audience Comme is Mr. Yoshinaka inquired if the $1,000 limitation applied to repairs. Mr. Mr. Ken Yoshinaka Ericksen explained that it does not providing the repair is of an emer- 3805 Lk. Wn. B vd.gency nature. Emergency repair is exempt. Any development that exceeds N. $1,000 will come under the ordinance. Mr. Hauth inquired about private Mr. George Haut residences below the 35 foot height. These would also be exempt. Mr. 3717 Lk. Wn. Ericksen also explained that they proposed a graduated fee schedule, Blvd. N. rather than a set fee, feeling this would be the more equitable way to handle the fee schedule. Other cities in the area varying in fees from Mr. Tom Teasdale $25 to $200. Mr. Teasdale inquired why only a portion of the Black River 506 S. 15th St, came under the act and Mr. Ericksen explained this was established by the State Department of Ecology based on water flow. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. • Renton City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 - July 3, 1973 • Citizen's Mayor Garrett invited members of the audience or any interested citizen Advisory that might want to serve on the Citizen's Advisory Committee provided Committee for in the Shoreline Management ordinance to submit their names for consideration. Ordinance 278,' MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO PLACE THE ORDINANCE ON Shoreline SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. The Clerk read the ordinance Management again. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED. Roll call vote resulted in unanimous affirmative approval by the Council. Audience Comments Upon inquiry by Mr. Clark Teegarden, Chairman of the Planning Commission, Mr. C. Teegar n on the subject of Port of Seattle Duwamish expansion, Chairman Grant 264 Seneca P1. NW of the Community Services Committee submitted the Committee's report recommending that the Port of Seattle not proceed with expansion within Mrs. Patricia the city limits of the City of Renton. They also recommended that the Seymour City Council meet with the Port Commissioners in the immediate future 2534 Burnett Ct. to discuss the proposed expansion. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY South SCHELLERT, THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE'S REPORT AND HAVE Port of Seattle CHAIRMAN GRANT ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING REPRESENTING CITY OF RENTON. Expansion Mrs. Pat Seymour concurred in Mr. Teegarden and Councilman Stredicke's concern with the impact of the Port of Seattle expansion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Mike Barden Mr. Barden inquired into the 'status of using house owned by the; City II 1 1020 Tacoma NE on Mill Avenue S. as a temporary Y.M.C.A Headquarters. Y.M.C.A. in MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THE QUESTION OF THE CITY- City-Owned OWNED BUILDINGS ON MILL AVENUE S. BE TAKEN FROM THE TABLE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THAT THE USE OF THE Property PROPERTY BY THE Y.M.C.A. BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES ' COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Council reconvened at 9:30 P.M. Roll Call showed all Council- 1 men present as previously shown. VOUCHERS Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schellert recommended payment 6595 - 6722 of Warrants 6595 through 6722 in the amount of $404,587.65 having received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services rendered. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT AS RECOMMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES & Legislation Committee Chairman Perry presented report recommending second RESOLUTIONS and final readings on an ordinance relating to licensing of coin-operated Ordinance 279, and similar music devices. . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT Musical DevicI6 THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. MOTION CARRIED. The Licensing Clerk read the ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, First Reading 7/2 THE ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED. Roll call vote was unanimous. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance 279, Legislation Committee Chairman Perry presented ordinance relating to Amusement Device licensing of amusement devices for second and final readings. MOVED BY Licensing SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION TO PLACE ' First reading17/2 ON SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. MOTION CARRIED. The Clerk read the ordi- nance. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI THE ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. Roll call vote brought unanimous affirmative approval by the Council. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE ADOPTED. Ordinance re 1 Legislation Committee Chairman Perry presented ordinance for first Uniform Building reading and referral back to Committee relating to the Uniform Building Code Code, 1970 edition, Volume I, together with Uniform Building Code Stand- ards for Volume I, 1970 edition. This amendment includes the appendix to the Building Code standards to our ordinance. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED. The Clerk read the ordinance. MOVED BY DELAURENTI, SECONDED BY CLYMER, TO REFER BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. r (7(f--ta-1 1 1/ 6 6_ • . `'�4 '9 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY . RENTON CITY COUNCIL • NOTICE IS HIEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has J fixed the 9th day of ' July ,. 19 73 , . t I 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a I public hearing to consider the f.ollowi.ng : - J I PROPOSED SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE II 1 lI I lI it ! 'I . 'I Any and all interested persons are •invited to be present it to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . I 11 CITY OF RENTON If ! ( t.'e,.:Z `i'.;.i (/, / `, 47a -"?-' I I Delores A . Mead , City Clerk 11 DATE OF PUBLICATION 6-29-73 11 I CERTIFICATION 'I STATE OFIWASHINGTON) ) ss . II COUNTY OF KING ) , Sax • (to I , • !vigil e L: y A'gas hereby certify that • 1 ••t ee («0A) copies of the' above notice were posted by me in I) . e comspicuous places ' pn the property describediand one ,..,, ,:~copy was' posted at the - City Municipal Building , Renton , ,f,:' i ,J,4ashingt'on on date of jrie, Ze;' • . • , 19 73 \ 'I` r, - , , Signed Loa 'h1 k _ ;..:. ATTEST : is in And for the State • it ,1 . ,.of Washington , residing at Renton . • it i i I ' I Renton City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4, July 2, 1973 OLD BUSINESS 1 , . I Report on Legislation Committee Chairman Perry presented report on .use of Plastic 'Pipe plastic pipe within the City from Acting Building Director !Crews, 6/18 referral, recommending no changes in present Plumbing Code and report- ing the use of plastic piping and fittings has given excellent service when properly installed per Code. I • Opinion ! . Councilman Stredicke requested a City Attorney opinion report on Attor- Requested on ney General opinion of Optional Municipal Code Cities relative to the O.M.C. Cities . new gambling legislation,' particularly opportunities available to OMC Cities! as opposed to those that are not. I . Port )f Seattle MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT THE SUBJECT OF'ITHE PORT OF Expansion in SEATTLE DUWAMISH EXPANSION BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES Renton and COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL. CARRIED. Tukwila I • MOVED BY. STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, MATTER OF CITY COUNCIL LET- Olympic Pipe Line TER SIGNED BY WILLIAM J. GRANT RELATIVE TO OLYMPIC HPE LINE COMPANY BE • 1 REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS •Watermain, etc. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE SUBJECT OF PROPOSED LID FOR L.I.D. Aberdeen ABERDEEN AVE. N.E. BETWEEN N.E. 27TH AND N.E. 28TH, BE REFERRED TO , Ave.. N.E. THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR 'DISCUSSION. ' CARRIED. i . Open1Space Upon inquiry of provisions of 'S'i$stitute House Bill 53 relating to Open Legislation Space Act, City Attorney Shellan advised governing authority consisted j of three members of County legislative body and three members of the P • City legislative body. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE; THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPOINT THE THREE MEMBERS REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RENTON IN REGARD TO THE OPEN SPACE LEGISLATION. Motion by r Stredicke, seconded by Bruce that the matter be referred to the Commit tee of the Whole for discussion, FAILED. Motion to authorize Council . , President to chose members, CARRIED. - I ' AUDIENCE COMMENT . Wayne Goddard, 3707 Lake Washington Blvd. N. , inquired regarding Shoreline Management Act and was advised Public Hearing schedule for ©.,I 0 July 9, 1973. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY DELAURENTI, SECONDED BY BRUCE, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The I ' Renton City Council Meeting adjourned at 12:05 A.M. Y , j Delores A. Mead, City C erk i i m j j • • 1t Renton City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3, Jilly 2, 1973 ORDINANCES ND RESOLUTIONS - Continued Resolution 1864 Legislation Committee Chairman Perry presented the 6-Year Urban Six-Year Stiteet Arterial Construction Program Resolution reflecting amendments approved and Arterial at Public Hearing this date and attached hereto, recommending adoption. Construction MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION Program OF COMMITTEE AND PRESENT RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Following reading by the Clerk, it was MOVED. BY DELAURENTI, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, Funding to MATTER OF FINANCING SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN BE FORWARDED TO THE Committee FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CORRESPONDEICE Letter from Mayor Garrett recommended the City Council surplus the two AND CURREN structures on the recently purchased Mill Ave. S. property, having them BUSINESS removed due to failure of the structures to meet City Code, the City "Williams and to use the lots temporarily as a parking area and for future develop- I�I ment. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE COUNCIL CONCUR IN MAYOR'S Allen" PropertyBRUCE, ,COUNCIL Ave. S RECOMMENDATION, DECLARING THE FACILITIES SURPLUS AND REFER TO 'THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY RESOLUTION. In order to determine whether or not one of the buildings could be used by non-profit organi- zation such as the Y.M.C.A. trying to locate in area, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THIS ITEM BE TABLED FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Frontage Road Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended the City grant Highlands permission to the property owners on frontage road, southeastelrly and adja- cent to N.E. Sunset Blvd. between N.E. 10th and N.E. 12th Streets, Highlands) to utilize the area for parking until required for street, design changes eliminating need of frontage road for street at,present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appropriation Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested excess revenue in of Excess the amount of $11,286 from Container Corporation be appropriated into Revenue the Water Utility account $401/534/32/63.80 for watermain construction on Monster Road tie line and that the matter be referred to the Legislation Committee. MOVED BY DELAURENTI, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REQUEST. CARRIED. I Additional Council President Clymer perused additional items submitted for the Agenda Item Agenda and submitted the following items to the City Clerk forjreading: Bid Opening City Clerk Mead presented, July 2, bid opening for two '73 1/2 ton 7/2/73 truc s pickup trucks for the Park Department with one bid received asshown on attached bid tabulation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, BID BE REFERRED TO THE PARK BOARD FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.' MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED' BY BRUCE, MATTER OF POLICY ON NUMBER OF BIDS BE REFERRED TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOVED BY PERRY,' SECONDED BY DELAURENTI TO AMEND MOTION TO REFER MATTER OF POLICY ON NUMBER OF BIDS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE BID CALL TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. City Hall Letter from Holm Legal Services representing Mr. Alvina Popke requested Lunchroom settlement by the City with the present operator of the City Hall Contract Lunchroom in order that Mrs. Popke can proceed with the operation of the lunchroom as per agreement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE MAYOR AND CITY ATTORNEY FOR FURTHER ACTION. CARRIED. Renton Air Fair Letter from Mr. Arnold Hubner and Mr. Bob Anderson requested waiver of July 28 - 29 permit fee for street banner for the Renton Kiwanis first Renton Air Fair on July 28 and 29, 1973 at the Renton Air Port, any monies derived to be used for support of community programs. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THE FEE BE WAIVED AND REQUEST GRANTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE STREET AND POLICE DEPARTMEN']S MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENTS Letter from Mayor Garrett appointed Mrs. Jean Musselwhite, 812 Jefferson Mrs. Musselwhite Ave. N.E. , to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term, expiring January 1, 1976, replacing Mrs. Hazel O'Harra, and requested Council concurrence. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Renton City CouncL. Meeting Minutes Page 2 - Juty 23, 1973 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (Continued) Reso.tutLon 1869 (C.A.G. 3002-72, Resotution 1869) , and N. 8th St. 8 Pa/Lfz Ave. N. Re.,SoewtLon 1870 £i.6t station (C.A.G. 3004-72, ResoteutLon 1870) be /Lead and adopted. The contxactts axe ba& a ten-yeax petuod and ate on Schedule 40, which was detetmined by the Pub1.Le Woxhu Depantment by a suxvey to be the mot bene6.iciaL to the City and saves the City appxoxi.matety $900. 00 pet yeah. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE RESOLUTION CONTRACTS. MOTION CARRIED. Bid Opening City Ctehfa xepotrted bid opening on Ju.ty 17, 1973 60r asphatt paving 7/19/73 60/ the Downtown Impxovement Pxoject with 6oux biddeAs /Leiponding Downtown Improve- (tabulation attached) and /Lead tette& bxom the Pubt c Wo/Lk-s Depa/ct- ment Pno ject ment xecommending that the conttact be awaxded to West Coast E.tec &ic Phase II Co. 06 Washington, Inc. Thtis p&oject Ls being 6unded by UAB with matching Fotwaxd Thxust 6unds. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY TO REFER TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED. C1ac:m box Damages C.tetk /Lead C.taim Got Damages 6/Lom Mts. Leta S. McVay, 427 Pank Ave. N. , Mfrs. Leta" McVay on June 29, 1973 box an atteged 6aLL on s.idewatfz on Wittiama Ave. S. • MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO REFER TO CITY ATTORNEY AND INSURANCE CARRIER. MOTION CARRIED. Audience Comment M&z. Baxter and Mts. Todd, both owneu 06 motors on Rain -ex Ave. S. Sign Code comp.tained 06 the tettepus xeceived 6xom the Building Depa&tment about Mtus. Saxah Baxtet their s.ig ns. Both 0.6 them said that a taxg e sign p'o ttr"ud.Lng out wa3 Baxtet's Motet the only way to att./tact the.uw Hind 06 business, because most (16 ,it was gom out-o6-town, also s-.gns ve&y expensive and they were 6utty Mfrs. Lo&t Todd .i.nsuxed. They had been there box a gxeat many yeatrs. ' Councilman Westw.ind Motet Giant asked Building D.ixectox Cxew4 i6 there had been vexy many comptaints since the "tettetrx had gone Out. Mx. Cxews said .there had been a numbetL 06 teLephone comp.ta.ints. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. Councilman Giant invited these people who object to the Sign Code to attend the Community Sexv.ices Committee meeting and po4s.ib"ty they would take a geed -t/rip, he wilt .let the peop.te know when the meeting wilt take p.tace. MOTION CARRIED. PROCLAMATIONS Mayo& Gan/Lett issued a Pxoctamation p/Locea imm.ng August 1973 as Renton Renton Aerie Aerie #1722 Fxatexnat Oxdet 06 Eag.teo Month, to ceLebxate theix 75th #1722 Fratexnat Ann ivensaxy this yeax, having statuted .in Seattle ,in 1898, and the Oxdex'o 6 Eag"te% Renton Ae, ,ie cetebxa Ling itz sixty-sixth yeax 06 gxowth and s exv.ice -i�he. C.i�ty o6 Renton. APPOINTMENTS Mayox Gatvicett submitted a tette& appointing Mx. Robetct, E. McBeth, .1.632 Citizens Adv.isoxy Linco.tn Count S.E. .in p.tace 06 Miss DebtLa Gwsta6son, who has advised Committee 60& that due to wo/LIz tseheduLe., she wi.2L be unable t0 accept the appointment. Shoteeine Mgt. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, TO REFER TO THE COMMUNITY M/L, R. McBeth SERVICES COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. ffC17 BUSIN e Commi tee 06 the Who.te xepotct xecommended the subject o6 the L. I.D. Pxopo4ed L. I.D. 60t Abexdeen Avenue N.E. Between N.E. 27th and N. E. 28th be xedetviced Abexdeen Ave. NE bacla to the Pub!.Lc Woxks Committee box 6utcthex study. MOVED BY SCHELLER1 SECONDED BY CLYMER TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED O.Lymp,ic Pipe Line The Committee 06 the Whose tepotrt recommended the Witt am Giant tette& xegaxdt.ng O.tymp-Lc Pipe Line Co. be xe6e -'ted to the Legis.tatLon Committee. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. Counci man Petxy 'said the putp04e Ls to update owvL axdinances as to what a Councilman may on may not do. Councilman Giant gave the C.tetwfz a £ettex 6xom City Attoxney Shettan, dated July 20, 1973, to /Lead, which was addxel,zed to .the City Council, Re: Committee 06 the Who.te meetLng on Juty 17th. The tette& Mated that he had been misquoted 1 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regutah. Meeting Juey 23, 197 r MunLc 1paZ Bui.Pding Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council ChambeAs 1 MINUTES FLAG SALUTE OD Mayan Avery Gatvtett, pne.sid%ng, .eed the P.eedge o AtZeg-ia.nce and CALL TO ORD R caPeed the Renton City Councie Meeting to Otcdett. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, CouncJ Pttes.ident; WILLIAM J. GRANT, KENNETH D. BRUCE, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, GEORGE J. PERRY, HENRY E. SCHELLERT. , MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN CHARLES DELAURENTI. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OFFICIA' IN AVERY GARRETT, Mayotc; JACK LYNCH, Adm.in stAative Assistant to Mayott; ATTENDANCE GERARD SHELLAN, City At-tattney; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance D-utecott; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City C.eekk; DEL BENNETT, A.ittpott Ddttec o/; DAVID HAMLIN, Ttca.“ic Engineer; VIC TeGANTVOORT, S.ttteet Sup ALntendent; GORDON ERICKSEN, Panning D.cttecta1; ARNOLD HUBNER, Po1Lce Depatctment; RICHARD GEISSLER, Assistant Fine Chief;' RICHARD HOUGHTON, U-ti P%t.Les Eng.ineett; WES CREWS, Acting Bui Zding Dikeectat<. MINUTE APPROV L Thette being no conttectionu oA additions to the Caunc-Le M-inu ez of 7/16/73 July 16, 1973, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL MINUTES BE APPROVED AS PREPARED AND MAILEV. MOTION CARRIED. VOUCHER APPRO'AL Finance and Petsonnee Committee Ch man SchePee -t recommended payment 6931 - 7143 o6 Watvta.n s 6931 through 7143, total amount o6 $310,393. 14, p.eub L. I.D. L. I.D. 278 278, Revenue #3, $631 . 80, Cash #3, $631. 80, att having ttece,ived depaAt- mentat czntLication a, to Aece.ipt a 6 menchandi s e and/ot< 4 etcv.ice4 Aende/Led. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT AS RECOMMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. i ORDINANCES A ' Committee o6 the Who.2.e Chaitrman Cfymen submitted Committee n'eport RESOLUTIONS Aecammending adoption o6 the W.I.N. Ptcogttam Ottdi.nance. MOVED:BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance 279 , Legi Ia ion Committee Chai unan Pehry submitted nepon t that the ordinance W.I.N. Pnog, ttans6etting $21, 508.00 byom Estimated Excess Revenue Fund uhto Wonh ' Funding Incentive PAogttam Fund, having been pZa.ced on 6itzt /Leading on July 16th, be placed on second and 6-Lnae /Leading. A6tetc. /Leading 06 the ordinance, .it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED. Rott catt vote nesutted .in 6.ive Ayes, Councilman S ttediche voted No. MOTION CARRIED. Appointment The Committee o 5 the Who.ee nepotr t was /Lead /Lecommending that'the Cauncit MA. Kenneth O. ' e cancan n the Mayo'b appointment o 6 M . Kenneth White ass Peti sonnet PetusonneL D ' ,c to- Dikecton. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION. /Wett some ensuing discussion between the Cauncitmen and the Adm.inistAatLon Aegand.ing the quaPL LcatLons of Mt. White Aeganding Cabo/ negotiations, the MOTION CARRIED. Resa.eution 186 The Leg-cz2.atian Committee /Lepottt Aecammended that the AerSa.eu,tian Fund TAan lief hors betvtLng $7, 136.00 4 tom the Contingency Fund unto Petcsonnee Settv.ices Pet/sonnet Dit ,cto- Cunttent Fund 4o/L the purpose o4 payment a saeatty and bene6i.,6 io- the Satatty and Petvsannee Dittectott liar the Aemain.ing Live months oli 1973 be Azad and BeneiLts adopted. The C.eeih Aead the Ae,otution and it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Puget Sound Power The Legiztation Committee Aepont Recommended that the 1ive Reiso.eution g Light Canto acts Contnact2 with Puget Sound Pawn and Light Co. 4o- pawn_ 6or .the ResoIution 186 Monroe Ave. N.E. boasteL pump station (C.A.G. 041-73, ResotutLon 1866) , Re.4o.eution 18 ;7 Lake Washington gush station (C.A.G. 042-73, Resolution 1867) , Re6otution 18 '8 lake WaShLngton NOi th .Pig station (C.A.G. 043-73, Resolution 1868) , Wet No. 3 pawett service at Ho us en Way and Bt onson Way, Renton City Council Meeting Minute-s Page 3 - July 23, 1973 OLD BUSINESS (Continued) Otymp.Lc Pipe Line in the new-spapeh hegatt.dLng CouncL,Lman Gttant'-s -statements and that hiz hemattha at the Committee 06 the (Uho& meeting were only genekaL in natu&e. MOTION CARRIED. Bid Awa td Pub1 Tc (Uohkz Committee Cha 'tman Bhuce -submitted a rn non ity hepottt Ttt.a.66ic Signatiza- heeommend,Lng that the Low bid o6 MuLV.i Sovi.Lcz Deve.Lopment CohpohatLon tLon Equipment be accepted in the amount a6 $320,975.46 6oh Package II Tha“-Lc S.LgnaL Syztem-s be accepted. Counci.Lman Bttuee exp.L.aLned that this wa-s a minority hepont only because he was .the only membek 06 .the Committee- pti.es ent at the meeting. The bid was within 1.. 5 0 o the Eng-.neett'. e-stimate. Wet -some duseuzs-Sion between the Councilmen and Tha66.Lc EngAneeh Haman about the -techni.cat t-Le-o 06 the bid zpeci.6icat.ionz and the dez itabiti y 06 Package II, it waz MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. Phopo-s ed L.I.D. The Public (Uohkz Committee hepont hecommended ( 1) that the Pubti c Watettma.Lvi-s - Won.k4 Depaktment pt oceed with the L. I.D. ptcocedutt.e to make a phe- Vici.nLty o6 t- m%natcy as-se-s-sment and kecommend a date 06 heatt,Lng. MOVED BY Stevens N.U. g SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO CONCUR IN THE FIRST RECOMMENDATION Taytoh NJU. on OF THE COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR A N. U. 2nd'St. RESOLUTION. MOTION CARRIED. The C.tehk head (2) og the tcepottt hecomrnendLng that concutttt.ewtty thette.with an annexation phagham in conjunction with othett ptt.opett iez in the ahea be commenced with the PLa.nni.ng Department and a petition be phepatted 6oh ,that att.ea 6oh annexation. It wa-s decided that it wab not necesoah.y, at this time, bah the Council to take any action on the -second hecommendation 06 the Committee.. Police Depatttment Councilman Bruce, in the absence o6 Public Satiety Committee Chairman Ezcoht Setw.Lee Detautcenti,, submitted the hepont 06 the Public Satiety Committee Gott FunvwL hecommend..ng that the City not,L6 y art 6unehat homeA that e66eetive aS o6 August 6, 1973, .the C.ity's PO ice Department will no .Lange/ phovLde escottt zehvice, but the same -sha t be phovLded by ptt,Lvate business, that the Ch.ie6 o6 Police. phepatte guideti.nes to be adopted in the hegutatLon 0.6 6unettaL etscontt6, and that this mattett be he6etvted to the Legiztation Committee. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. A6-ten. some 'discus-sion a,s to the heaaon-s bah the deeus.Lon to discontinue thtis zettvice and the phepana- tion o6 gui.detines ion houtes thttough the City, etc. , MOTION CARRIED. —(1CL i.zens ' ShoheL,Lne The Community Sehv,ices Committee hepot wa-s head by the C.tettk hecommend- Adv.itsohy Committee Lng concurttence in the Mayoh's appointments to the C,L.t-izens ' Shon.eL.ine Appo.intmentto Adv,isohy Committee ab 6ottowo : Mk. Don Humble, Mt. Alex Cug.Ln,L, Jtt. , MA. Anthun D. Schotez, Mtt�s. Dorothy Hettbe'it, Mtt. Robert t B.Lgnotd, Mtt. Robert W. Scha te, Mk. Robettt McBeth, Mho. Shatwn ,Negtay, Mtt. Stewwt Pope, Mk. LU,t Liam Goddattd and Mt. Robettt L. Pheip-s. Councilman Ghant heponted that they had met with rrto-st o6 the committee m,embetus phev.Low Ly and they hephesented a bhaad er.o-s-s section o6 citLzents. Council con • - cwvt.ence not ttequitt.ed. Po . 06 Seattle Counc i.Lman Gttant hepoh.ted meeting with Mtt. Fohd and two otheh hepn.e- sentatLves o6 the Pont o6 Seattle. Az 06 this date, thette LA no planned expans-ion within the. City 06 Renton. Game Phez ettve Councilman Ghant a z o n epon ted meeting with hephets entat.Lvet- $slam the Okittia FLatz Otu,Qti.a Ftatz area. Motte ahea .ice being committed 6oh a game ttezettve (about 6.L6ty actces ) and the State Depahtment o6 Game iZ going -to give ws a head-count 06 an imat 1 i.6e in the avt.ea. OLymp-Lc P-Lpe Line Councilman Sehettent atoked the C.Lekk to tread a .tetteh 6ntm the Otymp.Lc Pipe Line Co. The Lettett -stated that they wehe phepatt,Lng an Env.itton- menta.t Impact Statement to covek theit application 06 May 7, 1973, 6oh the phopa-sed second phoductz pipe .tine to be constttueted in the city timitts o6 Renton and would be 6attthcomLng in about a week oh -so. Renton City C unc t Meeting Minutes tees Page 4 - Juty 23, 1973 OLD BUSINESS Continued) John K. Pain, J . Councilman Sche 1 ecn t invited o 6 City A.ttonney Shettan negatcd%ng. Assistant City the condition oi4 Mn.. Pain who had been £njuned -Ln an accident oveA Attorney .the ptevious weekend. Mn. She ta.n neponted that, as yet, .there ways no change in his ctr i ticat condition. Renton Hitt I •hove- Cha,Lnman Pelvcy o6 the. Tnanupon>tati.on Committee submitted the Committee's ment Pnognam nepont negandLng the Renton Hitt Impnovemen-t Pnognam. The Committee des.iJLes to pees ent to ,the Committee ttee o. ,the Whole .two aLtennate pta.n4 ion the .cmpnovement o6 Renton Hitt zt' ee-ts including the Gnantt Avenue Extension. These plans au: ( 1 ) az recommended by the Pubi a Wm/vs Department including pah ti.ci.pa ti..o n by L.I.D. (2) az on,Lg-Lnatt y bud- geted £n the 1973 budget. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED, BY BRUCE, THAT THE REPORT OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. Councilman Petky said the Committee had lionm toted the two p.Pans and would Zile to have the pnesentat,Lon to the Cow-c,U when the people on the Hitt can be pne-sent. MOTION CARRIED. I C. Caney Donwo h MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THAT C. CAREY DONWORTHHAND & Associates I ASSOCIATES BE GIVEN THIRTY DAYS NOTICE OF TERMINATION ON DECEMBER 1, 7 Labor Cons nos 1973. A6ten some discussion on the tenors 06 the contAact with the La.bon consultants, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO TABLE THE MOTION UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Adjournment MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THAT THE MEETING ADJOURN. EMOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjouhned at 10:05. --axone Mo.ton, Deputy City C.2et . jt I I 4sr �~ =� THE CITY OF RENTON n k} MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 O co AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR .o QAtD SEP ' 1July 23 , 1973 • Members of the City Council , Renton, Washington --- ------.----.-,--_-'HonorableMembers: On July 16 ', I .appointed; eleven persons to the Shoreline Manage- ment Citizens Advisory Committee, subject to your "confirmation.' ':; ..'. Since then, one of the appointees , Debra Gustafson, has advised ;. . ' me that -due to her work schedule she will be unable to accept - the appointment .In her place I hereby appoint Mr. Robert E. McBeth, 1632 ` .. !``Lincoln Court SE, Renton, 255-2123 (home) , 255-5600 (work): Mr. McBeth is an attorney practising in the City of Renton, ?. and it is felt his services would be valuable to the Committee ` ', a Your concurrence in this appointment would be appreciated. Sincerely, :zivg Garat`f: Ma a/r ,„, , 1 cc: ,Gordon. Ericksen L ` f �!t✓lLr h / ` �� COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT JULY 23 , 1973 The Community Services Committee concurs in the Mayor ' s appointments to the Citizens ' Shoreline Advisory Committee as follows : 1. Mr. Don Humble 2. Mr. Alex Cugini, Jr. 3 . Mr. Arthur D. Scholes 4. Mrs . Dorothy Herbert 5. Mr. Robert Bignold 6 . Mr. Robert W.. Schalkle 7. Mr. Robert McBeth " 8 . Mrs . Sharon Neglay 9 . Mr. Stewart rope 10. Mr. William Goddard 11. Mr. Robert L. Phelps /<" 1 Chairman WilliamJJ. Grant J'l r- / Nt. Henry E-; Schellert ceTh ® 5 `r\ t.,� .r. r Mr. Richard M. Stre WJG:mg Renton City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 - July 16, 1973 AUDIENCE COMMENT (Continued) Sign Code SERVICES COMMITTEE. Upon inquiry, Acting Building Director Wes Crews - stated that letters had been sent to all businesses with signs not conforming to the Code. About four years ago Public Hearings were held which were attended by sign owners, sign manufacturers and other people interested and the present sign code was enacted in September, 1969. All nonconforming signs which have a replacement value of over $500 were given four years to be brought up to standards or 'removed. 'Councilman Stredicke suggested that if the people in the real estate business want to get together and meet with Council Committee, that the Chairman of the Committee would let Mr. Boyer know of the meeting. 1 MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Tom Teasdale Mr. Teasdale commented that he had also received a letter pertaining 124 Williams S. to a pole sign at his place of business which overhangs the street about two feet. Voucher Approval Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schellert recommended payment of Warrants 6723 through 6930 in the amount of $109,038.98 having received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services rendered. It includes Warrant 6771 for services payable to Shepard Ambulance. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED DELAURENTI THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT AS RECOMMENDED. Councilmen Perry, Bruce and Stredicke questioned the payment for Warrant 6771 to Shepard Ambulance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REMOVE WARRANT 6771 FOR FURTHER REVIEW. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. MOVED BY ST.REDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO REFER THE MATTER OF PAYMENT OF SHEPARD AMBULANCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE TO REPORT BACK. MOTION CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED. Council reconvened at 9:30 P.M. Roll Call showed all Councilmen present except Councilmen Clymer and Bruce, who appeared shortly afterwards. APPOINTMENTS Letter from Mayor Garrett was' read appointing the following persons Citizens' Shore- to the Citizens' Shoreline Advisory Board in conformance with Ordinance line Advisory No. 2789: Mr. Don Humble, 360 Stevens Ave. S.W. ; Mr. Alex Cugini, Jr. , Committee 611 Renton. Ave. S. ; Mr. Arthur D. Scholes,. 1708 Ferndale Ave S.E. ; Mrs. Dorothy Herbert, 3923 N.E. 6th St. ; Mr. Robert Bignold, 1308 Thomas Lane, Apt. 107; Mr. Robert W. Schalkle, 664 Sunset Blvd. N.E. ; Miss Debra Gustafson, 909 Union Ave. N.E. ; Mrs. Sharon Neglay, 656 Lind Ave. N.W. ; Mr. W. Stewart Pope, 3713 Talbot Rd. S. ; Mr. William Goddard, 3707 Lake Washington Blvd. N. ; Mr. Robert L. Phelps, 3831 Lake Washington Blvd. N. The Mayor's letter urged action as soon as possible so the Committee could start its work. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, TO REFER THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED. Personnel director Letter from Mayor Garrett was read appointing Mr. Kenneth J. White Mr. K. J. White to the position of Personnel Director for the City of Renton. Mr. White is presently employed as Personnel Director for Billings Deaconess Hospital in Billings, Montana and has a background providing him with a full range of personnel and administrative experience. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT TO REFER THE APPOINTMENT OF THE NEW PERSONNEL DIRECTOR TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Councilman Grant announced that the Community Services Committee would Glacier Park hold an informational meeting with representatives from Burlington- Industrial Northern, King County Department of Hydraulics and the Soil Conserva- Property tion Bureau regarding Earlington Flats area. Port of Seattle Councilman Grant reported that he had attended the Port of Seattle meeting as requested by the Council last week, reporting to them that Renton wouldn't want any action taken on the proposed inclusion of the Earlington Industrial Parks with the Port of Seattle. The City of Tukwila is anxious to be excluded from the boundaries of e. Renton City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 - July �6, 1973 OLD BUSINESS ( Iontinued) Port of Seattl the Commission. The Port of Seattle excluded Renton anyway. Mr. Dick Ford of the Port of Seattle would like to meet with the Community Ser- vices Committee. Y.M.C.A in Cit - Councilman Grant requested the Building Director to hold up on any action Owned Property regarding the two homes on Mill Ave. S. that belong to the City until the Community Services Committee has a chance to meet with representatives of the Y.M.C.A to review possibilities of that organization using one of buildings. Funding of L.I.' . Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schellert submitted a 270 - Sanitary Committee report that concurred in the recommendation of the Finance Sewers on the Director recommending a negotiated sale of LID bonds to the City's Shores of Lake Financial Consultant, Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation. Chair- Washington man Schellert said that some time ago the subject of funding L.I.D. 270 was referred to the Finance and Personnel Committee for permanent funding. The Final Assessment Rolls have been sent out, the amount of funding required is $71,700.87. Because this is a small issue, we would not recommend a public sale of bonds. The Finance Director has recommended that we negotiate for the sale of the bonds with Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, , TO CON- CUR IN THE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Stredicke asked if Seattle-Northwest we had a proposal from our Financial Consultant. The Clerk read the Securities Core. report from Mr. Richard T. Kennedy that the bonds are to maturelon or Mr. R. Kennedy before August 1, 1985 and are to bear interest, payable annually, at Vice President the rate of 6-3/8%. Bonds will be in the denomination of $1,000 each, with the exception of bond number one, which is in the denomination of $700.87. The offer was subject to certain standard conditions. ,1 Mr. Kennedy was in the audience to answer any questions. MOTION CARRIED. When asked what the percentage of interest was on the L.I.D. roll, Mr. Ted Bennett replied that it was at the rate of 6-1/2%. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THAT THE COUNCIL ACCEPT THE OFFER OF SEATTLE- NORTHWEST SECURITIES. MOTION CARRIED. Landlord-Tenan Councilman Perry inquired re Landlords and Tenants Legislation I'nd the Responsibility City's responsibility. City Attorney Shellan said he would look into Act the matter and report. Welcome Back Councilman Stredicke extended a welcome back to the Mayor's Administrative Assistant Jack Lynch from his two-week military leave. Downtown Project Councilman Stredicke brought up the matter of closing the downtown streets, Street Closur- saying that traffic at all times was necessary in order to haveicustomers During Con- for the downtown businesses. Councilman Perry also remarked that portions struction of Sunset Blvd. N.E. had been closed and rerouted. Mayor Garrett said that a short closure would probably speed up the project. Public Works Director Gonnason was asked to look into the matter . W.I.N. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, TO REFER THE SUBJECT; MATTER OF THE WORK INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR A SHORT DISCUSSION. MOTION CARRIED. Conflict of Councilman Bruce said that Councilman Grant had requested an opinion Interest from the other Councilmen on the ethics of his voting, or taking part in discussions, on the question of the application from Broadacres for Open-Space Classification. Councilman Grant left the Council Chambers during the discussion. City Attorney Shellan said it was illegal for the other Councilmen to make a motion deciding whether Mr. Grant had a right to vote. He quoted from the Code of Ethics, that if Councilman Grant had a remote interest, was only a salaried employee, and if his employment was not contingent upon the way he voted, then he has a right to vote, but not to 'cast a deciding vote. Upon inquiry from other Councilmen about their employment in various industries, City Attorney Shellan said that it was a matter of personal conscience whether they participate in anything that comes before the Council affecting the company they work for, and the same rules would apply. • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 25, 1973 Municipal Building Monday 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES ' FLAG SALUTE AND Mayor Avery Garrett, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called CALL TO ORDER the Renton City Council Meeting to Order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; HENRY E. SCHELLERT, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KENNETH D. BRUCE and WILLIAM J. GRANT. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, ABSENT COUNCILMAN GEORGE 'J. PERRY BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS AVERY GARRETT, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Direc- IN ATTENDANCE tor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; VERN CHURCH, Purchasing Agent; WES CREWS, Acting Building Director; VIC TeGANTVOORT, Street Superintendent; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Direc- tor; JACK LYNCH, Administrative Assistant; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief, DEL BENNETT, Airport Director; M. C. WALLS, Fire Chief. MINUTE 'APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THAT COUNCIL MINUTES OF JUNE 18, 6/18/73 1973 BE APPROVED AS PREPARED AND MAILED. CARRIED. VOUCHERS Finance and Personnel Committee Chairman Schellert recommended payment of 6313 - '6477 Warrants 6313 through 6477 in the amount of $255,084.84 having received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services rendered. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE PAYMENT AS RECOMMENDED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Legislation Committee Member Grant presented committee report that pro- posed Shoreline Management Ordinance be placed on first reading and Shoreline Public Hearing on the ordinance be set for July 9, 1973. MOVED BY GRANT Management SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE LEGISLA- Ordinance TI.ON COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Parking and IN A MOTION BY GRANT, WITH SECOND BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONFIRMED FIRST READ- Loading ING AND HEARING ONJULY 2, 1973 OF THE PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE. IN Ordinance A MOTION BY SCHELLERT, SECOND BY GRANT, AND CARRIED, ORDINANCE REFERRED BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Outdoor Fire Legislation Committee report recommended first reading for an ordinance Ordinance regulating outdoor fires and return to Legislation Committee. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN LEGISLATION COMMITTEE REPORT. City Clerk Mead read ordinance requiring prior permit issued by Fire Chief or representative for following allowed fires: (1) Small outdoor fires for pleasure, religious, ceremonial, cooking or like social purposes, (2) Fires for instruction in the method of fighting fires, testing fire resistant materials, or testing fire protection equipment. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, CONCUR IN LEGISLATION COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Fire Chief Walls advised permit not required for fire for cooking purposes if contained. CORRESPONDENCE • AND CURRENT Letter from Mr. Martin J. Blumenthall asked permission to hook up to the BUSINESS existing sewer in front of his lot on 80th Ave. S. between 130th and 132nd St. S. , Seattle, and told of petition obtained by Mr. Ed Lopan Request for from. home owners in same vicinity favoring sewer service. MOVED BY Sewer Connection STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THE LETTER FROM MR. BLUMENTHAL AND 80th Ave. S. PETITION OF MR. LOPAN BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC. WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Petition for Petitions bearing 24 signatures of. frequent users or abutting property Street owners along S.W. 16th St. was presented and read by the Clerk, which Improvement stated street had not been improved since it was originally built and S.W. '16th St. was in a deteriorated condition, also needing widening and sidewalks. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THIS PETITION BE REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS. CARRIED. Renton City Councii1 Meeting Minutes June 27, 1973 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS - Continued Downtown Renton Letter from the Downtown Renton Merchants Association requested waiver Merchants of $25.00 fee for placement of advertising banners across South 2nd Sidewalk Sale and 3rd Streets for the annual sidewalk sale July 5, 6 and 7, 1973. Banner Request MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, PERMISSION BE GRANTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE STREET DEPARTMENT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mr. Dan Shane, 3003 Mt. View Ave. N. , inquired regarding shuffleboard and pool table ordinances and fees thereof. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Grant presented committee report stating they have requested the Planning Department to furnish them with Gas Station existing and proposed franchises for Olympic Pipeline Co. Report requested Inventory that the Council approve an updating of the gas station inventory survey and recommended that the financing of survey be referred to the Finance and Personnel Committee. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Proposed Landfill Councilman Grant presented letter from State Department of Ecology ' regarding the proposed landfill of Glacier Park located near Mobile storage tank facility within City, which set forth guideline procedures for City action as the "Responsible Official" under the State Environmental Act. of 1971. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, THIS COMMUNICATION BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND THE COM- MITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR FUTURE MEETING. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Upon further inquiry of Mr. Dan Shane regarding amusement devices, City Attorney Shellan advised pool tables in pool halls licensed under Title 5, Chapter 18, while pool tables in taverns licensed under Title 5, Chapter 10 of the City Code , reading provisions therefrom. OLD BUSINESS ' Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Administrative Assistant Lynch recapped the Renton Area Youth Services program, advising funded through. Coordination June 30, 1974. Councilman Stredicke asked for coordination between City Between State ,and State during State Highway projects within the City, such as the and City on Sunset Blvd. project in the Highlands, citing unsafe conditions and Public Works street closures. Upkeep of Following discussion of planting and care of public right of way, it was Public R/W MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, THAT THE MATTER OF MOWING OF PARKING STRIPS BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Consultants (MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, AND CARRIED, THAT MAYOR'S OFFICE FURNISH COUNCIL WITH LISTING OF ALL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND OUTSIDE CONSULTING FIRMS HIRED BY THE CITY, WITH AMOUNT OF CONTRACT FEE, SINCE 1970. CARRIED. City's Councilman Grant presented letter from Finance Director Marshall which Banking and detailed the City's banking and investment practices listing as of June 15, Investments an investment total of $6,468,547.09 which. included Firemen's Pension Funds, Street Forward Thrust Funds and Federal Revenue Sharing monies, etc. AUDIENCE COMMENT 'Mr. Charles Shane, 300 Mountain View Ave. N. , inquired about collection of ',fees for amusement devices located in taverns and was advised by City Clerk Mead and City Attorney Shellan and Public Safety Committee Chairman Delaurenti that City Code defines devices to be licensed and fees to be 'paid, recently reviewed and updated by Ordinance #2785. Reporter 'Regrets were expressed and applause for a "job well done" offered as Leaving Councilman Stredick&' fl1binced-Mr. William Dugovich, reporter for the Record-Chronicle was leaving. Attention was also called that Mr. Phil Proto of the Greater Renton News was leaving the area for Nevada. 'MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Council_meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. res A. MeadCit Clerk m Delo , Y O1 R v Z OFFICE OFTIIE ('ITN' ATTORNEY • RE\TO . NVASIIINGTO POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2ND STREET BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5-8678 ,�9h GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY i3'4„ Q ti� JOHN K. PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY JRr CAPITA',-O II June 299 1973 11 Mere Gary Kruger Planning Department City Hall Renton s` WaiLn;ton Re : Shoreline Management Act Dear Caryl Would you please refer to our letter dated December 211 1972 oN addressed to Gordon Erickson in which we suggested that certain additions be made in Section 4 relating to our City Codef Section 4-710 (4) relating to municipal improvements. '�`hi, i, would actually apply to paragraph et page 9,I of the last I end final draft of the ordinance now in Committee. Mr. Coulon just brought to our attention the fact that this addition v I was not included end it might be helpful to do so for purposes i,, of clarification. We remain 11 Very truly yours g il 11 11 G1f3:ds Gs.ard K. Shelia:City Attorney hl 11 III 11 1 1 .1- ,,,,,,(,, - • \_..) \1\ \ - \ , Affidavit of Publication . , STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. 1 Barbara-Came:0a being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that ....s.hnis the ehicp.2 .elerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- , weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton ' Reord-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, Washington.That the annexed is a prob. shoreline• I mgmt . ordinance . , ( 1 . ; 1 • as it was published in regular issues (and 1 not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period ; - ofI 8:ori.N,qopTT.Ime-i€E.TCr:otPh:Ue..8,11:0:10tRuETT:01.,N.12:,!: one consecutive issues, commencing on the '1,:eis:,..1.-lt,Rt:Ef,N,RanTettoGnIT,CY,t ye 0:07-L., km I 29 June 73 ,.. day of , 19 , and ending the R e n.1,evt o7nal.isN ElMnogumtmatilnoAincNi p7a I day of , 19 ,both dates rcoetinsdtoplatitii:a; nci inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its T:fel Renton tal.eri dcli±'lei I iget:o' Subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee hf011owing• R,-t,k,,-R91,41-5_,'ED4s'irio'dREL ; 5.67 • ,,,meriG.EMENT.1 _ORDINANCE charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ , which ,,e70:nr1.1vyfet,e9d!tb,saga,pbpeirtiortrzeepssecwtnedt tpeo.uurs.ons has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words ifor the first insertion and • per folio of one hundred words for each • ap :::,::,,.. sx Opinions ;subsequent insertion. ,ison.:saum„els ::: thei,-5reommsa RENT0N ia(tIcat .:3,,, r_43:ordiet,;:„:ie'''(:);,41:uneC7 aa_amtiead, • chief c -rk p'br h . . ,,4 MU Clerk . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29. day of , . June 19 73 , N 2Le,r;e _ • •, , Notary P blic'n and for the State of Washington, esidIng at Renton,King County. _ -\ / —Passed by-ili ,Legislature, 1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective • June 9th,195N —Western IiIniqn Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, • adopted by the newspapers of the State. 1 . 1 I OFR-0 • s?)® UII 't PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINIGTON 21 MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • i236 2660 ° r� 41- • ctO MEMORANDUM D SEP1 I I June 28 , 1973 I I I I I •I I I TO: Del Mead, City Clerk � I FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Ordinance j I I � I � The Planning Department has reviewed said ordinance and has noted the revisions as requested by the Council Community Services Committee. We have some concern on the reduction of the Citizens Advisory Committee to seven members and will forward a memo to Councilmen Grant and Perry on the subject matter. GYE:bmi ' I Attach. (copy of Ordinance) � I I I 1_0 2829,,�p3 f qs '�� JUIy7973 ifs OPric II I I I ' I - 2h off. R 1 r J = 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON Y POST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 2ND AVENUE BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5.8678 o� J GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY JOHN It. PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY qt,�D,sEP����� June 21 , 197 3 Mrs Gordon Ericksen Planning Director City Hall Renton, Washington Re: Shoreline Management Ordinance Dear Gordon: We have received today a copy of the Community Services Committee Report dated June 18 , 1973 regarding the proposed amendments to the Shoreline Management Ordinance. We have made the additions on pages3and 14 to cover the "Master Program Formulation" and the establishment of the Citizen's Advisory Committee. We suggest you go over 'this matter carefully to be sure it meets with your full approval; otherwise, please make the necessary changes. Upon your approval, would you please forward the revised Ordinance, after the Clerk has made sufficient copies , to the Community Services Committee as well as the Legislation Committee for appropriate action. Thanking you, we remain Yours very truly, t.; Gerard M. Shellan City Attorney GMS:nd Encl.III (Copy of Ordinance) ( I 1 -- 11 it pF .R. 1. O1,11'ICE OIL TIIP. C'ITV ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASH(NGTON a I„ _``;_,':'''---'' C POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2ND STREET BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5-8678 0� ' fp GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY �' JOHN K. PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY p-r44. EPsC��� May 14, 1973 Mr. Gary Kruger Associate Planner City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 PI 11 Re: Proposed Shoreline Management Ordinance 11 Dear Gary: It has been a number of weeks now since we last discussed the 11 final revision of the above captioned Ordinance. We believe r► that it is essential that this ordinance, as revised, be forwarded to the appropriate council committees for early and speedy action. 1! If any later amendments are necessary, such as an Advisory 11 Collitt.e which . is not mandatory under the guidelines, this can d I be accomplished without too much difficulty later on. Please let us know whether you need any additional assistance in this matter. We also make reference to your letter of April 26, 1973 that you Jr) m and I discussed on the same day regarding a suggested resolution mfor a Lake Washington Regional Committee. I suggested to you at „ the time that you check with the other participants before a new 11 draft of any such agreement is written to be sure that there is 11 ®. meeting of the minds based on the various modifications that we had suggested and discussed. , 11 i 11 We shall therefore await further word from you on this matter. m We remain 11 Very truly yours, II II r/ -)./: --- e and M. Shellan f° i 11 GMS:bjm 1 11, 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT • JUNE 18 , 1973 SUBJECT: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE The Community Services Committee recommends the adoption of the Shoreline Management Ordinance with the following amendments : . I 1. On page 3 , insert the below definition between • the first and second definition and renumber I - • the definitions . . Citizen ' s Advisory Committee. The group of citizens appointed by the Mayor with concurrence • of the City Council Community Services Committee to assist in the formulation of the Master Program. • 2 . On page 14 , add a new section (4-2515) and . renumber the remaining sections . 4-2515 , Master Program Formulation . 1 . General . The City shall formulate the Master Program as required by , the Shoreline Management Act of 1971.1 ' 2. Citizen' s Advisory Committee. The Mayor shall appoint with the concurrence of the City Council Community Services Committee a Citizen ' s Advisory Committee • to encourage public involvement. The . Committee shall consist, of no more than -7 ( members appointed by the Mayor. The Committee ' s duties shall be assisting • in the formulation of the Master Program. The Committee shall have tenure .untili the Department of Ecology approves and ' the City Council adopts the Master Program. Chairman Wiliam J J. Grant . ;Henry E. Schellert . Richard M. Stred kci e .-s, - --6 M a-v--,--,2_ 9' - 7 3 ' , ier--&: 1,&-76jezi-64-- ‘ — ',, ,Sl 7-3 . . �~ t ',. `"� THE CITY OF RENTON z ;sza :, o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 p � %crn AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR o,P4TpD;SEPSE��� Jane 48 , 1973 Members of the City Council Renton, Washington , Hon.oI4ble Members : , The voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative 43B inNovem- ber of - 1972 relating to shoreline management; and subsequently the State Department of Ecology has promulgated rules and regulations to carry out 43B. , Included in these administrative rules and regulations is the requirement that a master plan for the development of shorelines within the, City be developed by December 24 , 1973 , and that a citizens',. advisory committee be established to guide the development of the plan. . Per the recommendation of the Council' s Community Services Committee, the following names are submitted for appointment to the citizens ' ad- visory committee and concurrence by the Community Services Committee. . Theselappointments should' be concurred in as soon as possible as the committee should .start its work immediately in order to meet the December deadline. 1. Don Humble, 360 Stevens Avenue SW, Renton, AL 5-3159 . I Mr. Humble is a .member of the Renton Planning Commission; a past Director of the Renton Planning Department and' a member of the Renton Planning Commission in the period of 1954 through 1960 . He has been active in subdivision development; has been employed by the Renton and Bremerton Housing Authorities , and worked in previous years for the Puget Sound Naval Shipyards . Mr. Humble was also a member of the lay committee that drafted the Metro enabling act. i 1 2. Alex Cugini, Jr. , 611 Renton Avenue South, Renton, -, AL 5-1281 (home) ,. BA 6-3900 (work) . Mr. Cugini is the manager of Barbee Mills in Renton; was a member of th;e Downtown Steering Committee; and enjoys boating and water skiing. 3 . Arthur D. Scholes , 1708 Ferndale Avenue SE , Renton, BA 6-0936 (home) , 237-7758 (work) . Mr. Scholes is as member of the Renton Planning' Commission; past chairman of the Renton Traffic Advisory Committee; past member of the Renton Optional Municipal Code Advisory Committee; a member of the Renton Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Scholes is a mechanical engineer employed by The Boeing Company.", Members of the City Council Page , 2 June ' 18 , 1973 4 . Dorothy Herbert, 3923 NE 6th Street, Renton, AL 5-8538 . Mrs . Herbert is a student of business administration at Bellevue Community College planning to transfer to the University of Washington. She is interested in and has concerns about environmental development. , O 5 . Robert Bignold, 1308 Thomas Lane , Apt. 107 , Renton, AL 5-0321 (home unlisted) , BA 6-3522 (work) . Mr. Bignold is president of ORB, an architectural and engineering firm in Renton. The firm designs and constructs parks and industrial facilities . Mr. Bignold is in charge of the development of Kent' s master shoreline program; is a member of numerous park associations and a member of the American Institute of Architects. 6 . Robert W. Schalkle, 664 Sunset Blvd. NE, Renton, AL 5-1885 (home) , 284-3906 (work) . Mr. Schalkle is presently employed by K-Smith Enterprises; formerly managed a marina in Seattle; has purchased sporting goods and managed a sporting 'goods store in Renton. Mr. Schalkle conceived the Valley Publish- ing Ski School and is interested in fishing , boating and; skiing. 7. Debra Gustafson, 909 Union Avenue NE, Renton, AL 5-3379 . Miss Gustafson is a recent high school graduate; works part- time for a veterinarian and plans to attend the University of Washington with the goal of a degree in veterinary medicine. Her interests are in sailing, horses and ecology. 8 . Sharon Neglay, 656 Lind Avenue NW, ' Renton, SP 2-4921. Mrs . Neglay is a housewife and a member of the League of, Women Voters . 9. W. Stewart Pope, 3713 Talbot Road South, Renton, AL 5-7252 , • Mr. Pope is a member of the real estate firm of Benton McCarthy, Inc. ; has been active in real estate and construc- tion; owned a Ford dealership in Renton. He is president of the Youth Tennis Club of Washington; a member of St. Luke 's Episcopal Church, Renton Rotary Club, and the Renton .. Historical Society. Sincerely, • /11 v,.6,62 YUi464L-- ery/ arrett Mayor cc Gordon Ericksen • i ,,. r ' . -J: OCT 2 19r � , I CITY OF RENTONI �" A - ,�vs„ 4 1 1 r _ a -T. 1 SHORELINE "ith i" ' . MANAGEMENT ! �, � 1. 1 - .. - ------------I- ----- --� ACT OF 1971 CREEK ." I 41111 v 1 t i . �`' III-6-ff LAKE , r Li .. . \ I 1i� , . WASH I NGTON �i �' /�� �wJ� , ,.•' " Mil AINAmt � ._._ —Iilin- Ei.....t =-y ��.I f -- Ir , : ,_ „,„„,, .. A r "IN E 4. .OEING : AMINO Ma rill I ,,ii 116 INN • . . -1. 1111ffiliii J _ � I/��1, . i I CEDAR RIVER "E,thST emle Orr �e. N BLACK ia�.®lE n��r� �V L j T— I • `�. O \ RIVER r , rI — ri ----- - PRINGBROOKA m - P ', '''-----t--- ----- • I , - , - �� I CREEK I I \ _ I '• \,44.;i1"---------:-7.HI-I-I-A— '''ka°10*-4111 . 1 11F toy+ , _ ,..,, liar in -- 1,__. , FA a ! .--.-E,_•:. ' I , . rin igirs" 1 Aws . „ip i! • .___ _ _._____ •_•___________„ il is "WM - ; ' '-.. 1%001 . , . O1 r I �I{I .s� sr • / 'i ,1 alg.: GREEN./ TT ' ' \ RIVER _ 119 /c / C I i - ti �`-t_ - i / ( --I T LAKE ‘-1) 1 I I - YOUNGS \\\- 1.." f ' T . i i . -r—Ir �� I 1 . il __I ' 1--1 0 . I . 1. . UV- . I i SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS Any construction of $1 , 000 value or more or any development which materially ' interferes with the normal public use requires a substantial development per- mit in w tlands, of shorelines of statewide significance as well a. shorelines . Wetlands are defined as those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directio s , as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark , an all marshes ,1 bogs , swamps , floodways , river deltas and floodplains . , associat d with the streams , lakes and tidal waters which are subject to the provi�io s of the Act-.' In the City of Renton the following bodies of water - are regu ated by the Act : CEDAR RIVER ; GREEN RIVER; LAKE WASHINGTON ; MAY \ Y \CREE.KIi.BETWEEN LAKE WAS;HINITON AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE ROAD AND MAY CREEK IN TH , SLE . QUARTER OF THE S . E . QUARTER OF SECTION 32-24N-5E ; SPRINGBROOK \REEK ;iINO TH FROM GRADY WAY TO THE BLACK RIVER ; AND THE BLACK RIVER WESTERLY r, flE C TY 1 IMT,TS . ) C$TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON OUTLINE OF PERMIT PROCEDURE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1. e applicant obtains the permit forms, completes and r-turns to the Planning Dept. 2. •plicant puts public notice in newspaper of general . rculation in Renton once a week for two weeks. 3. terested parties may submit comments to Renton canning Department for 30 - days following last public •tice. 4. ' ter at least 30 days from last public notice, Renton_ canning Department grants or denies permit. 5. ; thin five (5) days from the Renton Planning Department - tion, copies of the action taken and the application i•rm shall be submitted to the Washington Department of ology, and the office of the State Attorney General. 6 . if permit is granted, permittee cannot begin construction until ;15 days after date permit is granted. If permittee is informed hat a review of the permit is to be held by the Hearings Board Uhen he must further delay construction until the review is completed. 7. Ilhe minimum time required to processa permit is 83 days. 8 . IIf permit is denied, ,applicant may appeal to Shoreline Hearings Loard, as outlined below. APPEAL PROCEDURE Appeal initiated byDepartment of Appeal initiated bythe applicant P PP P Ecology of Attorney General or by a private party 1. Either the Dept. of Ecology or 1. Any person, including the Attod' ey General may request applicant, aggrieved by the revi- of the granting or deny-- granting or denying of a per- ing Jf a permit with 45 days of mit may request an appeal. the -ction of the Renton Planning The request is sent to the Department. Notice is sent to Dept. of Ecology, the Attorney the 'tanning Dept. and the General, and the, Hearings Board. Hearings Board. 2 . Either the Department or the 2. The -arings Board conducts a Attorney General must certify reviJ as requested and accepts the request as valid for the or o1-rturns the decision of review to continue. Certifica- the city of Renton. tion must be given within 30 day 3. Any tarty to the review may 3. If the request is certified, the appe-�1 the Hearings Board Hearings Board conducts a review decision to Superior Court. and sustains or overturns the decision of the City of Renton. 4. Any party who fails to obtain certification or any ,party to a review before the Hearings Board may appeal to Superior Court. 1 I I City of Renton Planning Dept. 11-71 .