No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCapitol Improvement Program (1982-1988) CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1982- 1988 ' I i I - i TABLE OF CONTENTS I . Revenue Sources A. Bonding Capacity B. Assets C. Miscellaneous Revenue Sources I . Mayor's Summary and Recommended Priorities III . Department Reports A. Fire B. Parks and Recreation C. Police D. Library E. Finance F. Joint Projects G. Public Works 1 . Traffic Engineering 2. Airport I , 3. Water 4. Sanitary Sewer 5. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Approved by Council July 27, 1981 I ' i PAGE 1 I. REVENUE SOURCES A. Bonding Capacity - Total City Property Value = $1 ,710,240,038 1 . Indebtedness for General Purposes - without a vote of the people: Legal limit: 3/4 of 1% on property value $ ;12,826,800 G.O. Bond liabilities $1 ,050,000 Less redemption fund assets 149,118 Excess of liabilities over assets $ 900,882 ' Total Net General Indebtedness $ , 900,882 Margin of Indebtedness Still Available $ 1i ,925,918 2. Indebtedness for General Purposes - with 3/5th vote of the people: Legal limit: 22% on property value $ 42,756,001 Indebtedness incurred -0- Net general indebtedness from Section 1 above $ 1 900,882 Margin of indebtedness still available $ 41 ,855,119 3. Indebtedness for Utility Purposes - with 3/5th vote of the people: Legal limit: 5% on property value $ 85,512,002 Indebtedness incurred -0- Total indebtedness from Sections 1 , 2 and 3 $ 1 900,882 Margin of indebtedness still available $ 84,611 ,120 4. Indebtedness for Open Space and Park Facilities with a 3/5th vote of the people: Legal limit: 72% on property value $ 128,268,003 Indebtedness incurred $6,000,000 Less redemption fund assets 650,000 Excess of liabilities over assets $5,350,000 Total Net Open Space and Park Indebtedness $ 5,350,000 Total indebtedness from Sections 1 , 2, 3 and 4 $ 6,250,882 Margin of indebtedness still available $ 122,017,121 i_ PAGE 2 B. Ci y Owned Assets that May Apply to Proposed Projects Value Project/Page Land Improvements 1 . Fire Training Site (Lind Ave SW) $ 658,750 $ 1I - 13 2. Fire Station #12 66,000 154,000 y - 17 3• Property - Station #13 on Benson 33,000 5 - 19 • 4. NCR Century 101 Computer 11 ,500 ,26 - 46 5. Present City Shop Site 348,500 27 - 48 $1 ,117,750 $154,000 Tot= 1 Assets $1 ,271 ,750 • C. Mis ellaneous Revenue Sources 1 . City General Revenue 2. Local Improvement Districts (L. I .D.) 3. Housing and Community Development Block Grants (H&CD) ?+. Interagency for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) 5. King County Parks and Open Space Bond Issue (proposed) 6. Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) - Referendum #38 Municipal Water Supply Funding Program 7. Federal Funding Sources a. General Revenue Sharing (FRS) b. Housing and ,Urban Development (HUD) c. Economic Development Administration (EDA) d. Department of Transportation pp (DOT) e. U. S. Fire Administration (USFA) f. Federal Aid Urban Systems (FAUS) g. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) h. Airport and Development Program (ADAP) i . Federal Aid Safety Projects (FASP) • Page 1 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept # Y Description Acquisition Development Local ShareState Share Federal Share Joint Proj. 1 27 Maintenance Shop Facilities - $4,026,512 Pub Works/ pg 48 Highlands adjacent to county Utility , shops - Parks 2 7 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park $40,000 $8.952,000 G.O. Bonds $7,825,000 Land b Water P9 �3 Development Fee Simple Investment Conservation $ 8,000- - - Earnings $ 469,000 Funds $706,000_ Easements Fire 3 1 Fire Training Facility Unknown $ 85,000 Councilmanic Bonds Revenue Sharing pg 13 Option #1 Sale of Applicable U.S. Fire Assets Administration Finance 4 26 New Computer System $200,000 Trade In Existing Revenue Sharing ' pg 46 Equipment General Fund S134.420 Joint Proj. 5 28 Cedar River Trail Acquisition $200,000 H&CD IAC Planning/ pg 50 Thomas Property _ Parks Parks 6 12 Highlands Administration $ 250,000 General Funds EDA pg 28 Building Renovation H&CD a I , a1 iI W I I - • -- ---- - ----- --- - ---- ---- -- - -- --- Page 2 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept M N 'escrtp-tIon Atqui-sition Development Local—Share State share Feederal—Share Parks 7 13 Senior Center Parking Expan- $ 100,000 General Funds IAC Revenue Sharing pg 29 sion and Pea Patch HWCD Fire 8 3 Construct Station #14 in $ 80,000 $ 470,000 General Funds U. S. Fire pg 16 Kennydale G.O. Bonds Administration 4 Relocate Station #12 in $ 80,000 $ 470,000 Revenue Sharing Appl pg 17 Highlands Sale of sets - - cable Assets Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 9 8 Heather Downs Acquisition $ 240,000 General Funds pg 24 (Acq. Fund 1689) County Bond Issue Comm. Fac. Fund Pub Works ' 10 35 Lighting Replacement $ 100,000 General Funds Revenue Sharing Traffic pg 61 Engineering Arterial Street Fund (}C gas tax) Airport Fund Library 11 25 Renton Main Library Remodel $ 574,148 General Funds Revenue Sharing pg 44 and Construct Second Floor (Cum. Res. #3390) Addition Bond - G. 0. or Councilmanic a YI m - Page 3 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept -Q # Descri-ptlon Acquistt of n Development Local Share State Share Federal Share Parks 12 11 Renton High School Athletic $ 450,000 General Funds IAC Revenue Sharing page 27 Complex Renton School District Joint Proj. 13 29 Burnett Pedestrian Corridor $ 400,000 $ 200,000 General Funds H.U.D. Parks/ pg 52 Acquisition C.I.D. Planning 30 Burnett Pedestrian Corridor H&CD pg 53 Development Parks 14 9 Cedar River Park Community $4,100,000 G. O. Bonds pg 25 Center County Bond Issue Parks 15 '10 Liberty Park Community $ 90,000 H&CD $43,500 pg 26 Building General Funds The succeeding projects were submitted by the various departments and do not necessarily reflect the Mayor's priorities. a cl m vi Page 4 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept # • # Description Acqui-s-i-ti-on Development Local Share State Shaye Federal—Share Fire 2 Second Floor Addition to $ 132,000 Comm. Fac. Fund Revenue Sharing pg t5 Station #11 for Fire PreventionCouncilmanic Bond Bureau Fire 5 Construct Station #15 in $ 470,000 Comm. Fac. Fund Revenue Sharing pg 19 Earlington Industrial Bonds U.S.F.A. Area Sale of Applicable Asset - Lind Property Fire 6 Relocate Station #13 $ 80,000 $ 70,000 Comm. Fac. Fund Revenue Sharing pg 21 Bonds U.S.F.A. Parks 14 Sierra Heights/Glencoe $ 240,000 Comm. Fac. Fund IAC Revenue Sharing pg 30 Park Acquisition County Bond Issue Parks 15 Golf Course Acquisition $2,278,000 G. 0. Bonds pg 31 Maplewood County Bond Issue Parks 16 Sports Park Acquisition $ 450,000 County Bond IAC pg 32 Issue Comm. Fac. Fund m a o m as - Page 5 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept A' k Desc-r-i-pt-ton Acqui-si-ti-on—Deveiopmerrt LocafiShare State are Federal Share Parks 17 Heather Downs Neighborhood $ 400,000 County Bond IAC pg 33 Park Development Issue Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 18 Talbot Hill/Springbrook $ 240,000 County Bond IAC pg 34 Neighborhood Park Issue Acquisition - - - - - Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 19 East Kennydale Park $ 250,000 County Bond IAC p9 35 Acquisition Issue Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 20 Mother's Park Recreation $ 750,000 County Bond Revenue Sharing pg 36 Center Renovation Issue HBCD Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 21 Tiffany Park/Benson Hill $ 240,000 County Bond IAC pg 37 Neighborhood Park Issue Acquisition Comm. Fac. Fund Parks 22 Covered Playcourts $ 250,000 General Fund Revenue Sharing p9 38 D mry V Page 6 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept # N Description Aeq-0-0 tion Development Laca1—Share State—Sfiar`e Federal Share Parks 23 Cushion Turf Field $ 100,000 County Bond Issue pg 39 Phillip Arnold Park General Funds Police 24 Construct Office Building $ 861,144 Bonds pg 41 and Garage Comm. Fac. Fund Finance 26 New Computer System $ 200,000 General Fund Revenue Sharing pg 46 $134,420 Trade In Existing Equipment Planning/ 31 City Entry Point Minimal $ 100,000 Gas Tax Revenue Sharing ' Parks pg 54 Enhancement L.I.D. General Fund Planning/ 32 Cedar River Trail $ 590,000 H&CD IAC E.D.A. Parks pg 56 Natural Zone Development County Bond Issue Planning/ 33 Wetland Acquisition $ 600,000 Eastside Watershed Parks pg 57 Project $1,250,000 Donations Comm. Fac. Fund County Bond Issue m a cm m CO I Page 7 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept I i Description Acquisition Development Local share State Share Federal—Share Planning/ 34 Lake Washington Boulevard $ 100,000 L.I.D. D.O.T. Pub Works pg 58 Bikeway Bicycle Grant HECD Program Pub Works 36 Traffic Signal Controller $ 200,000 General Funds FASP Traffic pg 62 Modernization Comm. Fac. Fund FAUS --- -Engineering Arterial Street Fund (it gas tax) Pub Works 37 Computer Enhancement $ 220,000 Arterial Street FAUS Traffic pg 64 Fund (it gas tax) Engineering Comm. Fac. Fund Pub Works 1 38 ADAP Fencing Installation $ 125,000 Airport Fund 20% ADAP 80% Airport pg 65 Pub Works 2 39 Water Main - Upgrading $ 140,000 Airport Fund Airport pg 66 Pub Works 3 40 Overlay Taxiway "A" $ 337,000 Airport Fund 20% ADAP 80% Airport pg 67 Pub Works 4 41 Water Main - Complete $ 108,000 Airport Fund pg 68 Loop System y c) m lI • I ' i Page 8 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Priority Project Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept # # Deser-i-ption Acqu-i-s-i-t-ien—Development Local-Share State-Share Federai-Share Pub Works 5 42 Microwave Landing System $ 250,000 ADAP - 100% Airport pg 69 - Pub Works 1 43 Construct Well #9 Pump $ 150,000 Utility Fund Referendum #38 Water pg 70 Station Comm. Fac. Fund Municipal Water Utility SupSupply Funding 9 ym Pub Works 2 44 24" Transmission Line $ 350,000 Utility Fund Water P9 71 Through CBD Capital Outlay Utility Pub Works 3 45 Construct West Hill $1,000,000 Capital Outlay DSHS Referendum Water p9 72 Reservoir Utility Fund #38 Utility Pub Works 4 46 16" Transmission Main, $ 200,000 Capital Outlay Water P9 73 Aberdeen Ave. NE from Utility Fund Utility NE 14th St. to NE 28th Comm. Fac. Fund St. Pub Works 5 47 South Talbot Hill $ 50,000 $ 650,000 Utility Fund Water pg 74 Reservoir Comm. Fac. Fund Utility m n o m O Page 9 CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1982-88) Pri_cu_Lty rojest Project Location and Total Cost Potential Funding Sources Dept d II Description Acquisition Development Local Share State-Share Federal-S Pub Works 1 48 May Creek Sanitary Sewer $2,000,000 Utility Fund Sanitary pg 75 Interceptors Revenue Bond - Sewer L.I.D. Comm. Fac. Fund Pub Works 2 49 Lift Station at NE 4bh and $ 100,000 Capital Outlay Sanitary pg 76 Union Ave. NE Utility Fund Sewer Comm. Fac. Fund Pub Works 3 50 Replace Line - Mill Ave. S. $ 700,000 Utility Fund Sanitary pg 77 to Shattuck Ave S., Houser Sewer Way S.to Cedar River Pub Works 4 51 Replace Line - Main Ave S. $ 600,000 Utility Fund Sanitary pg 78 to Shattuck Ave. S., R/R Sewer Tracks to Grady Way Pub Works 5 52 Replace Line - N. 3rd St. to $ 700,000 Utility Fund j Sanitary pg 79 Bronson Way, Burnett Ave. N. Sewer to Houser Way Pub Works 6 53 Replace Line - N. 6th St. to $ 600,000 Utility Fund Sanitary pg 80 N. 3rd St., Burnett Ave. N. Sewer to Garden Ave. N. -u a m m PAGE 12 PROPOSED FIRE INPR OR PRIOTMENT RITIZED PROJECTS ED ORDER 1 . Training Facility . Station #11 Office Expansion . Construct Station #14 (Kennydale) 4. Relocate Station #12 (Highlands) 5. Construct Station #15 (Earlington) 6. Relocate Station #13 • PAGE 13 PROJECT 1 DEPARTMENT: . Fire DEPT. PRIORITY I 1 CAPITAL PROJECT: Construct a training facility that would include a five story tower, a burn building, flammable liquid and C. P. gas props and material storage, storm drainage and flammable liquid separators, fencing, drafting pit, classroom and storage, blacktop, cement surface for drill and driving area and hydrants. ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 678,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) General Funds 2) Bonds 3) Revenue Sharing 4) U. S. Fire Administration Grant OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) City owned property (5 1/2 acres) on Lind S.W. 2) 3) BACKGRUND: The present training facility being utilized by. the Fire Department onsists of a three story wooden drill tower located in the Cedar River Park. his facility is totally inadequate for the proper training of our fire supp- ession personnel. There is limited floor space, lack of proper access to he tower, no ability "to provide smoke room drills and the structure should e at least five stories tall. POiENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The proposed city shop site in the Highlands adjacent to the county maintenance facilities. This property is presently zoned for training site use. The rchitect that has been hired to design the city shops is studying the feasibility of providing the fire training facility on adjoining property. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: he additional costs to the City would include the annual maintenance and up- eep. The benefits that would accrue include our enhanced ability to properly rain our on duty personnel on a continual basis. By providing facilities o test our pump apparatus, we can avoid the cost and additional risk of sending our equipment to Seattle for testing. OPTIONS: 1) Build the facility in phases starting with site preparation and a tower/smoke room. ' 2) Share existing facilities with.other departments. 1 � I PAGE 14 PROJECT 1 ASSET # 1 Site: SW 19th and Lind SW Valu -- land: $658,750 improvements: Total : $658,750 Zoning: Heavy industrial Size -- land area: 5 1/2 acres sq. ft. or acres improvements: sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Appr isal Date: March, 1980 Notes: (background, comments, restrictions) The site on Lind Ave. SW was purchased in 1965 as a result of a Survey and Rating Bureau recommendation that the Fire Department have a training facility. The site was filled and some storm drains were installed. There was money budgeted for the site to be built but due to lack of water in the area, it was never developed. The area is zoned Heavy Industrial and is worth much more with that zoning. We have contacted Pollution Control and they advised us that we would not be able to obtain training fire permits for this area because of its closeness to the freeway. I feel we should sell five acres and reserve one-half acre for a possible fire station. - PAGE 15 PROJECT 2 DEPARTMENT: Fire - Administration Priority #1 DEPT. PRIORITY # 2 CAPIT L PROJECT: Provide a second floor at Station 11 for the Fire Prevention Bureau ESTI •TED COST: TOTAL $ 132,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ FINAN'ING: 1) General Funds 2) Councilmanic Bonds 3) G. 0. Bonds OSTEN'IBLE ASSETS: 1) ' I 2) 3) ' I BACKS OUND: In the original plans for the new station,, the Administration wing was o be much larger than it is. Due to money restraints, the Administration wing was reduced in size. When the preliminary plans were being drawn for the new tation, we only had 5 people working in Administration. We now have 10 people working in an area designed for 7 to 8 people. The Fire Prevention Bureau has the most people and probably the least floor space per person. Four people are Confined to one large• room and have no proper facilities to carry out their assi,ned duties. POTEN IAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) This would be an addition to the present Station at 211 Mill Ave. So. I I I-, COST/,ENEFIT ANALYSIS: There would be approximately $500.00 a year for upkeep. • OPTIONS: 1. Find another location in a City facility 2. Lease office space. in an available building in the area ' I _ I i I —, PAGE 16 PROJECT 3 • • i - UEPA•TMENT: Fire - Suppression Priority 01 DEPT. PRIORITY 0 3 • CAPI AL PROJECT: Construct Station 14 in the Kennydale area (to be done in conjunction with department priority 04) j I CSTI ATED COST: TOTAL $ 550.000 I , ACQUISITION $ 80.000 DEVELOPMENT $ 470.000 FINANCING: 1) General funds 2) Councilmanic bonds 3) G. 0. Bonds OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) None 2) _ I 3) BACKGROUND: This area of the City is developing at an accelerated rate, both commercially and residentially. The proposed Quendall complex will include three to thirty story structures and will require ladder responses. Our ! response time to this area now is in the six to eight minute range. We must be able to reach this area within a four minute time span. The Master Plan recommended this facility and a Planning Department study done in 1972 also recommended a station in this area. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Preferably the station location should be in the vicinity of NE 30th and Highway 405. The area is zoned for business. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Costs would include at least twelve personnel ($341,380), one new pumper ($150,000). land would cost approximately $80,000 and site • preparation, building and miscellaneous equipment about $470,000. The greatest benefit would be a much faster response time to the above mentioned residences and businesses. • OPT ONS: 1) Continue with the existing Highlands station and allow the fire problem to continue. 2) Build the facility over a two year period at approximately $440,000 per year. • I ' PAGE 17 PROJECT 4 • • DEPARTMENT: Fire - Suppression Priority #2 DEPT. PRIORITY # 4 DAPI—AL PROJECT: Relocate Station 1112 to Sunset Blvd. NE in the vicinity of Union Ave. NE 'ESTI .TED COST: TOTAL $ 550.000 • ACQUISITION $ 80.000 DEVELOPMENT $ 470.000 • FINA CING: 1) General funds 2) Councilmanic Bonds 3) G. 0. Bonds PISTE SIBLE ASSETS: 1) Land - S66,000 2) Building - S154.000 3) BAC ROUND: Station #12 was built in 1943 and remodeled in 1959. The station as built to provide fire protection for the Highlands area which has grown substantially since 1943. In a 1972 Planning Department study on fire station 1 cations, it was recommended that this station be moved east to better serve the rapidly growing area. The present station is in need of major repair lecause of its age. POTE TIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) rea of Sunset Blvd. NE and Union Ave. NE. We understand there is property in the area zoned R-1. 1 COS /BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Other than the property acquisition and building, here would be no other annual costs. • OPTIONS: 1) Provide service from the present location • PAGE 18 PROJECT 4 • i • ASSET 9 2 Site: NE 9th and Harrington Value -- land: $ 66,000 improvements: $154,000 Total: $220,000 Zoning: R-3 Size -- land area: 13,000 sq. ft.xaxxagRAR improvements: 5,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. .ppraisal Date: otes: (background, comments, restrictions) The station was originally built by the Federal government for fire protection for the federal housing in the area at the time. When the area was annexed into the city, the Federal government sold it to the city for $1.00. With the rapid expansion of the Highlands area, it has become increasingly evident that the station should be relocated to a more suitable area for proper fire protection. I I i PAGE 19 PROJECT 5 DEPA'TMENT: Fire DEPT. PRIORITY # 5 CAPI AL PROJECT: Construct Station 15 in the Earlington Industrial Area ESTI ATED COST: TOTAL $ 470,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ 470,000 FINANCING: 1) Bonds 4) Revenue Sharing 2) Community Facility Fund 5) USFA Grant 3) Sale of Applicable Asset OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Lind SW property 2) 3) BACKGROUND: As the Earlington Industrial area continues to grow, the need for a fire facility to serve that area increases: The City has owned ' 5 1/2 acres on Lind Ave. SW since 1965. It is recommended that 1/2 acre of this property be reserved for a future station site. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) SW 19th and Lind SW - I COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: After the construction costs, the City would be faced with additional manpower and equipment costs. A two bay station with one engine company requires nine to twelve employees to maintain proper manning levels. The annual maintenance costs would amount to approximately $3,000 per year. The benefits to providing a new facility in this area would include the faster response times and the improved service to an area of our City that contains a very high average assessed value. • OPTI'NS: 1) Continue to serve area from Station /13. • 1 PAGE 20 PROJECT 5 . ASSET # 3 Site: Benson Highway Property and SW 19th and Lind SW Property alue -- 1 land: Benson - S33,000 Lind - $55,000 improvements: Benson - Building to be relocated Lind - Vacant Total: $88,000 oning: 'ize -- land area: Benson 100 x 200 sq. ft. or acres Lind 1/2 acre improvements: sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ppraisal Date: March 1980 otes: (background, 'comments, restrictions) Station 13 was constructed with the idea in mind that t t it could be moved if the need arose. Station 15 in the industrial area has been suggested for a number of years. • I I i i I I - PAGE 21 PROJECT 6 • • DEPARTMENT: Fire DEPT. PRIORITY # b CAPIT PROJECT: Relocate Station #13 I ' I I ESTIM TED COST: , TOTAL $ 150.000 ACQUISITION $ 80.000 DEVELOPMENT $ 70.000 FINAN ING: 1) General Funds 4) Revenue Sharing 2) Councilmanic Bonds 3) G. O. Bonds OSTEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) 2) 3) BACKG•OUND: In 1980 the City constructed Station #13 in South Renton. That station is centrally located so that it may provide service to the industrial a ea in the Earlington flats as well as the primarily residential community s•uth of the railroad tracks. When the commercial/industrial development in t e valley requires a station located in a closer proximity, the property ned by the City on Lind Avenue should be developed. This will allow us to •ve Station #13 to a position further east to serve the expanding residential community in that area. POTEN IAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 148th S.E. and Petrovitsky Road COST/:ENEFIT ANALYSIS: By waiting until development in the valley progresses, w- may better judge where a permanent station should be located east of the h•spital. The portable nature of the sleeping quarters and equipment shed at Station #13 will limit the construction cost for a new station. No additional npower or equipment will be required since this station is already operational. ' I OPTIO S: 1) Continue to serve the southeast area of the City from Station #13 in its present location. 2) Sell Station #13 and the property on the Benson Road and use the proceeds to acquire property and construct a permanent facility. PAGE 22 PROPOSED PARKS DEPARTMENT PROJECTS IN PRIORITIZED ORDER 1 . eene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Development 2. Heather Downs Neighborhood Park Acquisition 3: Cedar River Park Community Recreation/Arts Center 4. Liberty Park Community Building Renovation 5 Renton High School Athletic Complex Development 61 Highlands Administration Building Renovation 71 Senior Center Parking Expansion/Pea Patch (Old Shop Site) 81 ierra Heights/Glencoe Neighborhood Park Acquisition 9: Golf Course Acquisition 10� Sports Park Acquisition 11 . Heather Downs Neighborhood Park Development 12. Talbot Hill/Springbrook Neighborhood Park Acquisition 131. East Kennydale Neighborhood Park Acquisition 14. Mothers Park Recreation Center Renovation 15. Tiffany Park/Benson Hill Neighborhood Park Acquisition 161. Covered P l aycourts 17. Cushion Turf Field - I ' PAGE 23 PROJECT 7 i I DEPART ENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY 1 CAPITA PROJECT: GENE COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK ESTIMA ED COST: TOTAL $ 9,000,000 40,000 Fee Simple ACQUISITION. $ 8,000 Easements DEVELOPMENT $8L95_ 2. 000 FINANCI G: 1) G.O. Bonds - $7,825,000 � I 2) Land 6 Water Conservation Funds - $706,000 3) Investment Earnings - $469,000 OSTENSI;LE ASSETS: 1) 2) 3) BACKGROUND: TIe City acquired the park site between 1955 6 1972 utilizing land trades, Forward Thrust Bond Issue Funds, HUD Open Space Funds, and City Funds. The citizens of Rento approved a $7,825,000 Bond Issue to develop the park in the 1979 primary election, of which $6,000,000 have been sold to date. Completion of the park development project isl sl ted for late summer, 1982. POTENT! L SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Locat d on the southeast corner of Lake Washington, the site is currently in City ownership. Portions of the site are zoned R-1, R-3, and G. There is no available lake front property available on this scale for similar development in the City of Rei ton. COST BE EFIT ANALYSIS: The City of Renton residents have placed a high priority on completing this project and re ffirmed their willingness to support the M60 costs by approving a Bond Issue fol. de elopment in the fall'of 1979. It would be fiscally irresponsible not to proceed as rapidly as possible so that funds committed will be maximized negating the high inflationary trends. The purchase of the land in question, primarily with Federal HUD funds, precludes use of the land for any other purpose than recreation. Estimated M60 Costs - $110,000 OPTIONS: 1) No Action. 2) Do only part of the project at this time. - 3) Conplete the project by selling the remainder of the Bonds. 1 • PAGE 24 PROJECT 8 DE ART ENT: PARKS b RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY # 2 I� • CAPITA PROJECT: HEATHER DOWNS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUISITION - 10 acres ESITIMA ED COST: TOTAL $ 240,000 .11 ACQUISITION $ 240,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) Park Acquisition Fund - #1689 2) County-wide Bond Issue - Proposed for 1982 ' 3) Use agreement with City water utility for joint use of existing utility land on Union. 4) Community Facilities Fund • OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) $36.000 from sale of Highlands Public Use Area 2) ' BACKGROUND: • �IThe 'cquisition of this park site is designated as the number one acquisition prio ity in the City of Renton Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan. l POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) ,Heat er Downs area of Renton (neighborhood #8 - City of Renton Comprehensive Park and 'ecreation Plan). COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: II i� Cost of land in this area it escalating rapidly while the number of viable potential jsite is rapidly vanishing. Acquisition at this time would be fiscally prudent and oul. insure the City's ability to provide future park services in the area at the time when development is mandated. • Esti ated M&O Costs -• $2,000 undeveloped $40,000 developed 1 • OPTIONS: 11) o action (service area with existing facilities at Kiwanis Park) I) •urchase smaller site. 3) ork with City.utilities to develop existing utility site in area. i I i PAGE 25 PROJECT 9 DE'ARTMENT: PARK 6 RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY # 3 CA'ITAL PROJECT: CEDAR RIVER PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 4,100,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ 4,100,000 1 FINANCING: 1) Potential County Bond Issue - 1982 1 2) City Funding - G.O. Bonds 3) ' OS'ENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) 2) 3) BAKGROUND: geed for this facility is established in the Renton Comprehensive Park 6 Recreation lan. Existing facilities are outdated and need major renovation. This physical/ ultural arts facility would compliment the existing performing arts facility (CARCO THEATRE) giving Renton a Recreational Civic Center. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Cedar River Park (currently in City ownership). 11 COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: st of construction continues to escalate rapidly while the need for such community acilities continues to grow. Several revenue generating facilities are included in 1 he proposed project to help offset M60 costs. The proposed location is a good example market place approach to providing recreation services. Estimate M60 costs $200,000 (up to 40% of this could be offset by revenue). OPTIONS: 1) No Action (serve City with existing facilities). • Remodel and substantially upgrade existing facilities for short term benefit. 3) Construct the facility• In phases. 1 1 PAGE 26 1 PROJECT 10 I DEP RTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY # 4 I� CAPITAL PROJECT: LIBERTY PARK COMMUNITY BUILDING i ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $90,000 ACQUISITION $ - DEVELOPMENT $ 90,000 FINANCING: 1) HECD - $43.500 1 2) City Funds - $46.500 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) $90,000 currently budgeted (source noted above) j' 2) 3) BACKGROUND: Libe ty ParkCommunity Building is the Ci.ty's old senior center and currently is u-ed for Developmentally Disabled Programming, Arts & Crafts Classes, meeting neig borhood summer playground program, and special events such as the 4th of July cele•ration and flower shows. Part of the building was constructed around 1914 and 'leno ation is necessary for continued use. . j . POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Libe ty Park. COST/B:NEFIT ANALYSIS: 1 the igh cost of new construction continues to make renovation a viable alternative and nflationary trends indicate more of the same. Renovation with an eye to re- dire 4ted functions is necessary at this time to make the facility more usable and to p event further deterioration of the building. i . 1 1 OPTION 1) Action (continue current limited use until such time as the condition merits . 1 demolition). 1 2) 'emolish and rebuild as needed. , ' . I I I I I i PAGE 27 PROJECT 11 DEPARTMENT: PARKS b RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY # 5 CAPIT L PROJECT: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC COMPLEX ESTI 'TED COST: TOTAL $ 450,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ 450,000 FINA CING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. 2) Renton School District - No funds currently budgeted, 3) IAC - Potential for 50% funding/restrictive OSTE SIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKfROUND: Thi City and School District work very closely together in providing joint use of pulpit facilities for educational/recreational use. The co-development and mainten- a4e of Renton High School will result in total community use of badly needed facilities and is a cost effective approach for the community. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Renton High School it ' I COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: By co-developing this nine (9) acre school site, the City will be saving itself the cot of acquisition of land since the land in question is already in public ownership. Co development and maintenance also saves the City long term capital and MS0 costs when 1 co pared to the alternative of developing and maintaining City owned property. OPTIONS: 1) No Action (service area with existing facilities). 2) Acquire, develop, and maintain City property to meet active sports needs of the City. 3) Phase the development of the site working with the Renton School District to provide 1 both capital and maintenance costs. I -_ PAGE 28 PROJECT 12 DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. PRIORITY # 6 CAPITAL PROJECT: HIGHLANDS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING RENOVATION ESTIM'TED COST: TOTAL $ 250,000 ACQUISITION. $ DEVELOPMENT $250,000 FINAN ING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. 2) H&CD - Facility identified in three (3) year H&CD Plan. 3) EDA - If program refunded and Oroiect selected. OSTEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE • 2) 3) BACKGI OUND: ' This building has been used for a variety of governmental functions over the years and has deteriorated with age. Current use is as a recreation facility and water shop maintenance. Future use. is anticipated to include recreation with the Water Division moving to the new City Shops. The Facilities Maintenance Division of the Park Department ( includes all City buildings ) will then be housed in this area. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1 Highlands Administration Building 800 Edmonds Ave. N.E. Renton CiOST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: They high cost of new construction continues to make renovation a viable alternative and inflationary trends indicate more of the same. Inclusion of Parks and/or Facilities Maintenance units in the new shops appears to be financially infeasible at this time and for the near term. Renovation with an eye toward redirected functions is called for at this time to prevent further deterioration of the building. OPTIsNS: 1) No Action (continue current use until building condition is such that it must be vacated). .2) Demolish building and rebuild as needed. 3) Renovate the building in phases. PAGE 29 PROJECT 13 DEPARTMENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 7 CAPITAL PROJECT: SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION& PEA PATCH I ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 100.000 ACQUISITION, $ DEVELOPMENT $ 100.000 • • FINANCING: 1) H6CD - Area is located in NSA 2) IAC Development grant (unlikely) • 3) City - No current funding OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The City shops currently located on the site are slated to be moved within the next two (2) years. The Renton Senior Center has inadequate parking to meet even current demands. Forty new spaces are contemplated. The remainder of the land will be kept in a eyance for future City needs as determined by the City Council. Proposed interim use is as a pea patch for all Renton residents. POTENT AL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) City of Renton Public Works Shop site. • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: i The cost of acquiring land and developing additional parking in the vicinity of the Center would be extremely high and would probably involve condemnation. There is little or no land available in the area for current and future city needs. Parking is at a premium at the Center even with public transportation (Metro) and car pooling. The pea patch should be self-supporting and involves the least amount of capital outlay for jnitial development. Esti ted M60 - $6,000 (includes operation of maintenance building) OPTIO 1) 4o action (leave Shop land as is). i 2) Work within existing parking constraints and encourage car pooling and improvement of public transportation. • • PAGE 30 ' PROJECT 14 • DEPAR MENT: PARKS E RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 8 CAPIT L PROJECT: SIERRA HEIGHTS/GLENCOE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACOUISITION - 10 Acres ESTI TED COST: TOTAL $ 240,000 ACQUISITION. $240,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) Community Facilities Fund I , 2) Proposed, County Park Bond Issue - 1982 3) IAC Funding - Potential 60-75% OSTEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) -- 3) BACKGROUND: Si rra Heights/Glencoe Neighborhood Park acquisition is identified in the City's Co prehensive Park & Recreation Plan as a high priority. The City constructed G1 ncoe Tot Lot in 1978 as an interim measure but it is wholly inadequate to meet th! demand. King County has a 4.7 acre site on the western boundary of this neigh- borhood outside of the City limits. TOTE TIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) • 1I Si rra Heights/Glencoe area of Renton (neighborhood #11 - City of Renton Comprehensive Pa k E Recreation Plan). • • OST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: 1 The availability of land suitable for neighborhood park use is rapidly dwindling and inflation is driving acquisition costs up rapidly. The purchase of property now that ' is suitable to meet future recreational needs is responsible from a growth management perspective as well as a fiscally sound investment. Estimated ME0 Costs - $2,000 undeveloped $40,000 developed OPTIINS: • 1) No Action (serve area with existing facilities). 2) Work with King County to enlarge their present site. 3) Work with King County and the Renton School District for a Joint development program using County park and School District lands. PAGE 31 PROJECT 15 DEPARTME T: PARKS E RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 9 I CAPITAL -ROJECT: GOLF COURSE' ACQUISITION III I ESTIIMATE' COST: TOTAL $ APPRAISAL IN PROCESS ACQUISITION $ 3.275.000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCI G: 1) G.O. Bonds, 2) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982 3) OSTENSI:LE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The City is interested in preserving or providing a Golf Course in the Renton area. Earlipton Golf Course is slated for development as an industrial park area in the irrtnedate future. Development pressure on Maplewood Golf Course merits an investigation into the potential acquisition by the City. POTENTIJL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1. M plewood Golf Course (Maple Valley Highway). 2 G neral Renton area if a new course were to be acquired and developed from scratch. COST/B NEFIT ANALYSIS: Tie acquisition of Golf Courses must be approached in a very careful manner and generally only When the private sector, for whatever reason, no longer finds it feasible to market Golf Course operations. A market place approach to purchasing or developing Golf Courses should be adhered to with an eye to other functions the course can provide such as open sipac or urban buffering. If the course can generate sufficient revenues to pay for its annual operation and long range capital requirements, the cost to the general public is up ' iron in the acquisition and does not present an ongoing burden on the taxpayers. In retu n, the opportunity for the average citizen to participate in golf as a recreational outl t is preserved with the user footing the annual M60 costs and usually valuable open gree space is added or preserved. OPTION : ) o Action (allow normal private sector supply and demand to dictate the availability 2) df Golf. Course). • ope for inclusion of,a Golf Course in the Renton area in the 1982 proposed County Bond Issue then hope the issue is successful. - 3) Work with potential developers of such land to preserve a nine (9) hole course. 1 PAGE 32 PROJECT 16 DEPARTMENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY II 10 CAPIT L PROJECT: SPORTS PARK ACQUISITION/20-30 Acres • ESTIM TED COST: TOTAL $ 450.000 ACQUISITION $450.000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINAN'ING: 1) City -.No funds currently budgeted. 2) IAC - Potential for 60-75% funding. 3) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982. 4) Community Facilities Fund. OSTEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The City has been impacted by tremendous growth in team sports such as soccer, softball, and baseball with the result that existing facilities are overused and damaged. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Site could be located in either the northeast or southeast planning quadrant of Renton as service area access and land availability are optimum in these areas. i I • COST/�ENEFIT ANALYSIS: Th cost of repairing existing turf fields that receive multi-sport use is substantial, especially those exposed to soccer use in the winter. Some fields will eventually have tobe totally renovated 'if we continue (Liberty Park had to be totally renovated in 1973). OPTI'NS: 1) No Action (provide existing level of services). 2) Work with King County and/or Renton School District to acquire property and/or develop existing properties. 3) Acquire and develop smaller sites. I - PAGE 33 PROJECT 17 • • DEPART ENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 11 CAPITA_ PROJECT: HEATHER DOWNS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 400,000 • ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ 400,000 FINANCING: 1) City -.No. funds currently budgeted 2) IAC - Potential for 60-75% funding. 3) Proposed ,County Park Bond Issue - 1982. 4) Community Facilities Fund 0STEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) • BACKG'OUND: 'The need for developing this site is established in the City of Renton Comprehensive Park E Recreation Plan. Recent development of multi-family units in the area and :development pressures in general mandates completion of this project. 1 • • POTEN71AL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Hea her Downs area of Renton (neighborhood #8 in the City's Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan) • COST/ ENEFIT ANALYSIS: • De elopment at this time would help to negate the impact of inflation on this project. Since a final site has not been selected and the availability of easily developed sites is diminishing rapidly, final construction costs could contain an inordinant amount of si e corrective measures adding to the project's costs. 1 OPTIoNS: 1) No Action (service area with existing facilities). 2) Develop utility land in area or combination utility-City. 3) Continue to work with developers to include recreational facilities in their developments. PAGE 34 • PROJECT 18 • DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 12 CAPITAL PROJECT: TALBOT HILL/SPRINGBROOK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUISITION - 10 Acres ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 240.000 ' ACQUISITION $ 240,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) City -'No funds currently budgeted. 2) IAC - Potential for 60-75% funding. 3) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982. • 4) Community Facilities Fund OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) • • 3) BACKGIROUND: Th need for acquiring a site for a neighborhood park in this area of Renton is called for in the City's, Comprehensive Park & Recreation Plan: ' I , FIOTEhTIAL SITE: (location,, cost, zoning) Talbot Hill/Springbrook area of Renton (neighborhood #4 in the City's Comprehensive Pa & Recreation Plan). COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Acquisition at this time would help to negate inflationary trends and insure better options for potential sites. Site availability is declining as growth occurs. Es imate M&O Costs - $2,000- undeveloped $40,000 developed • O PTI'NS: 1) No Action (service area with existing facilities). 2) Purchase smaller site. 3) Work with King County Parks to secure land. ! , 4) Look for opportunities to work with developers to set aside land. ' PAGE 35 PROJECT 19 DEPAR MENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY N 13 CAPIT'L PROJECT: EAST KENNYDALE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUISITION • ESTIM TED COST: TOTAL $ 250,000 ACQUISITION. $250,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. 2) IAC - Potential for 60-75% funding. 3) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982. 4) Community Facilities Fund OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE I 2) 3) BACKG'OUND: The need for acquiring an East Kennydale Neighborhood Park is established in the City's ( Comprehensive Park 6 Recreation Plan. i POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Ea-t Kennydale area of Renton (Neighborhood #13 - City of Renton Comprehensive Park an• Recreation Plan). • LOST/ ENEFIT ANALYSIS: Acquisition now would help to negate inflationary trends and secure land suitable for th- intended purpose. Cost savings for acquisition and development will be realized by purchasing now. OPTI'NS: 1) No Action (service area with existing facilities). - 2) Purchase smaller site. 3) Lookfor opportunities to work with developers to set aside land. PAGE 36 PROJECT 20 DEPA' MENT: PARKS t. RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 14 CPI AL PROJECT: MOTHERS PARK RECREATION CENTER RENOVATION • ESTI ATED COST: TOTAL $ 750,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ 750,000 FINA CING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. 2) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982. 3) H&CD Funds. 4) Community Facilities Fund OSTE SIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKGROUND: Mothers Park Recreation Center was constructed in 1939 and has served the City for ov-r 40 years. It is still heavily used and badly needed and if renovated and added to could continue to serve the City for the foreseeable future. POTE TIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Mo hers Park (already in City ownership). COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: T ere is an obvious financial benefit to the City to renovate this facility. The c.st of replacement would be at least four times greater. The park was donated to t e City for recreational use only so it would be wise to maximize its capacity to p ovide recreational opportunities. E timate M&0 Costs - $12,000 OPTIONS: 1 No Action (provide existing level of services until building is no longer usable). 2 Phase renovation with annual capital program. 3 Complete feasibility study, a Master Plan, and renovate the building. PAGE 37 PROJECT 21 DEPARTMENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 15 CAPITAL PROJECT: TIFFANY PARK/BENSON HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUISITION/ 7-10 Acres ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 240,000 ACQUISITION. $240,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FINANCING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. 2) Proposed County Bond Issue - 1982. 3) IAC - Potential for 60-75% funding. 4) Community Facilities Fund. OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACKPROUND: Th- need for a neighborhood park in this area was established in the City's C. prehensive Park and Recreation Plan. I , POTE TIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Be son Hill area of Renton (Neighborhood #5 - City of Renton Comprehensive Park an• Recreation Plan). I � COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Th� rapidly escalating cost of land in this area along with a limited number of potential sites makes early acquisition a critical issue. It is in the City's best interests to begin implementation of and aggressive program to secure park si es for future development. Es imate M60 Costs - $2,000 undeveloped $40,000 developed OPTIONS: 1) No Action (service area with existing facilities). 2) Purchase smaller site. 3) Work with King County and/or the Renton School District to Jointly secure land and/or make better use of existing public owned land. I PAGE 38 - PROJECT 22 1 i I DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY d 46 CAPIT L PROJECT: COVERED PLAYCOURTS/PHILIP ARNOLD, KIWANIS,_ TIFFANY, TALBOT HILL, AND KENNYDALE LIONS PARKS. EISTIM TED COST: TOTAL $ 250,000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $250,000 FINANCING: 1) City - No funds currently budgeted. I 2) 3) I OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) BACK ROUND: Weather conditions in this area mandate extensive use of indoor or undercover facilities. Dual use for inclement weather picnic shelters is anticipated. FOTErTiAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Ph lip Arnold Park/Kiwanis Park/Tiffany Park/Talbot Hill Park/Kennydale Lions Park - all in City ownership. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: These structures have dual use capabilities and are a viable alternative to buildings wh ch are far more expensive to maintain and operate. • Es imate M&O Costs - $5,000 OPTIONS: 1) No Action (serve areas with existing facilities). 2) Complete Philip Arnold and Kennydale Lions Parks projects only (others are located near school gyms). 3) Complete projects on phased basis. 1 ' PAGE 39 PROJECT 23 DEPARTMENT: PARKS b RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 17 CAPITAL PROJECT: CUSHION TURF FIELD ES(TIWTED COST: TOTAL $100,000 ACQUISITION. $100,000 DEVELOPMENT $ FPNANsING: 1) City -.Currently there is no allocation. 2) Proposed County Park Bond Issue - 1982. 3) OSTEN IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) , 3) BACKG'OUND: Fal -winter sports are currently wrecking havoc on our turf fields causing undue mai tenance and associated costs. One way of meeting this demand is the installation of - cushion turf field at Philip Arnold Park which has existing lighting. POTEN IAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Philip Arnold Park. COST/ ENEFIT ANALYSIS: Co r struction of this facility would make multiple, year-round use of existing park property possible using 'an existing sports lighting system. It would lessen MSO Cots while increasing use-potential. Estimate MS0 Costs - $4,000 ' I I I . OPTI'NS: 1) Purchase,and develop additional property. 2) No Action (use existing facilities). • 3) Work with the Renton School District to develop and maintain unusable School lands. ' - I PAGE 40 PROPOSED POLICE DEPARTMENT PROJECT li. Construct Office Building and Garage • _ I RECEIVED PAGE 41 JUN 8 1981 PROJECT 24 CITY OF RENTON i MAYOR'S OFFICE DEP.RTMENT: Police DEPT. PRIORITY # One (1) CAPITAL PROJECT: Construction of 9,600.square.foot.office building and garage • . over.the existing police parking lot JEST MATED COST: TOTAL $ . . .861,144 ACQUISITION$ .none . . . . DEVELOPMENT $. 861,144 FIN NCING: 1) Councilmanic Bonds . . . . . 2) General Obligation Bonds . . 3) IOST:NSIBLE ASSETTS: 1) none 2) 3) BACKGROUND: In October 1968 the Renton Poice Department moved into its present location. At that time the police department had (51) officers and (10) civilian e ployees and the building space allocated to the police department was adequate fcr the department's needs at that time. As we progressed from 1968 to 1981, the p lice department has added personnel and has had tomake changes within the building to accommodate the department's growth. Several areas have been enclosed to make additional office space. The additional space was needed as the department has gOwn to (59) commissioned personnel and (20) civilian personnel. Many of the personnel added have been in the Support Services such as the Detectives, Jail, Photography Laboratory and Records. As each necessary support position was added, 4ace inside the police department had to be found. Support areas that have been a+ded are: (1) Training Section 2 Research & Development Division (3) Narcotics Unit (4) Investigations Clerk (5) Community Relations Section (6) Polygraph Section (7) Juvenile Detective (8) Increase in Detective Division from (4) man division to (10) man division (Narcotics and Juvenile not included in this figure). (9) Chief Clerk The police department at the present time is overcrowded due to the increases in staff listed above. With the projected increase in the City by future annexations and proposed buildings (through April'81, 96-single family houses, 362-multiple units, and 6-commercial units have been built with 1,790 multiple family units proposed to be built in 1981 or early 1982) the police department has reached a critical point in its need for additional space. POT NTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Parking lot currently used for parking police vehicles located on the leas side of the present City Hall building. No cost for property acquisition bec use the City owns the site and it is currently zoned for such a building. COSIT/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The proposed building would allow for an orderly expansion o� the police department and allow for additional security for police vehicles. In reducing the overcrowding it would allow for more efficient use of manpower as there Would not be continual interruptions for persons who share offices. _ I � ccntinued- • 1t PAGE 42 PROJECT 24 OPTIONS: 1. Find additional office space either in City Hall or located in another facility. 2. Add portable buildings or trailers on a temporary basis. 3• Do nothing - which could result in less efficiency within the support and field divisions due to overcrowding. I ' PAGE 43 PROPOSED LIBRARY DEPARTMENT PROJECT 7 . Renton Main Library Remodeling and Second Floor Addition - 1 . i RECE1y ,9E T 25 JUN 29 1981 CITY OF RENTON I `_. "—--— -- -. MAYOR'S OFFICE PEPA TMENT: LIBRARY DEPT. PRIORITY / l RENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Remodeling & Second Floor Addition CAPITAL PROJECT: • ESTI TED COST: TOTAL $ 574,148 . Acquisition $ Development $ 574,148 '. FI NCING: 1) Cumulative' Reserve Fund for Library Facilities' Planning, 2) Acquistion, Improvements and Construction. 3) • OST NSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Cumulative Reserve Fund #3390 ----$10,258.92 2) 3) '1 BACKGROUND: Se Floor Addition $222,394 Energy Conservation $22,942 Repairs $33,737 Bo kstacks (steel) $ 25,222 Equipment/Furniture $17,790 Carpet $47,283 Bogk Security System $ 14,043 Circulation Control -System $42,000 Wa�slhington Library Network (Computer System Services) $27,960 Heating/Cooling System (Energy efficient beat pump) $115,000 (POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1 Renton Public Library -- Building includes a roofed clearstory area of 3,000 1 square feet planned as a future second floor addition. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: ^ Addition will provide needed book storage capacity for a collection that will meet molt needs of Renton residents and provide for future growth of City. Access to a computer network at the State level and automated circulation control system will - enable existing staff to meet increased demands for service; a cost avoidance measure. Bobk security will cut losses and provide patrons with more reliable service. All ! I energy conservation and heating/cooling system projects will be analyzed on a life ' cylcle cost basis to provide maximum benefit. Most of the repair items are security and safety items which will upgrade the building to meet the current building and fire codes. These changes and repairs will benefit and protect the public and the OP'IONS: building. Heating/Cooling System - Weigh against potential energy savings, comfort of library users which are more and more adult as the profile of the City changes, and preservation of books in a controlled environment. I I PAGE 45 PROPOSED FINANCE DEPARTMENT PROJECT 1 . Purchase New Computer System PAGE 46 PROJECT 26 PT PRIORITY DCPAR MENT: Finance ' DEPT. # t • CAPITAL PROJECT: Purchase New Computer System ESTI TED COST: ; TOTAL $ 200,000 ACQUISITION $ 200,000 DEVELOPMENT $ F1NAN;ING: 1) $134,420 budgeted in 1981 supplemental budget 2) General Revenue 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Existing equipment (NCR Century 101). trade-in value $11,500. I 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The City has had its existing system (NCR Century 101) since 1976. The pure ase price for this equipment was $138,458. The final payment was made in 1979. hil this system is still performing well and meeting the basic needs of the city, down ime has steadily increased as the machinery has aged. The Century 101 has logged Over 12,000 operating hours to date. In t e 1981 budget, funds were allowed for consultants to study the computer needs of the ity. The results of this study are due in September, 1981. The 1981 budget also earmarked $134,420 in an acquisition fund so that the equipment could be purchased as soon as the needs assessment was complete. POTE TIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) COS BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Presently, files are updated as much as a week after transactions occ r, leaving departments without current information in the interim. An interactive system would allow immediate updating of files, giving the using departments instant acc ss to account information. Sine all input would be .via CRT's, a new system would eliminate the need for punch cards, an annual $1,500 expenditure. Paper requirements would also be reduced significantly as users would gain much of their information directly through their CRT's. Even though repair costs are covered by an annual maintenance contract, increased down- ' time will eventually affect crucial deadlines like payroll, vendor payments, utility bilrngs, etc. • OPTIONS: 1. Budget funds for acquisition at a later date. 2. Investigate contracting for computer services.* 3. Lease new equipment.* ' * These options will be addressed in the consultants report. PAGE 47 PROPOSED PROJECTS TO BE DEVELOPED BY MORE THAN ONE CITY DEPARTMENT 1 . Maintenance Shop Facilities 2. Cedar River Trail Acquisition 13. Burnett Pedestrian Corridor Acquisition '4. Burnett Pedestrian Corridor Development 5. City Entry Point Enhancement 6. Cedar River Trail Development 17. Wetland Acquisition '8. Lake Washington Boulevard Bikeway PAGE 48. PROJECT 27 c DEPARTMENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY / • CAP TAL PROJECT: Maintenance Shop Facilities .,EST MATED COST: TOTAL $ 4,765,628 REL TED COSTS: Acquisition $ 614,503 -, $100,000 1/2t Gas Tax Project Architect $ 190,000 1 on Monroe Ave. NE Development $ 3,961,125 $15,000 Furnishings - Contingency Fun] FINANCING: 1) Balance remaining in '316' Fund $ 609,000 i 2) Utility Bond Issue allocation $ 240,000 3) Councilmanic Bonds $1,800,000 $2,649,000 Total OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) Existing shop site 6 building 2) 3) OACKGROUND: New offices, shops, garage, storage and vehicle parking facilities to be built on site purchased from King'County - south of NE 4th Street and east of Monroe Ave. NE, adj cent to the new County Shops. Will house Maintenance Administration; Street/ Stotm Sewer/Sanitary Sewer/Water System Maintenance crews plus Central Garage/ Equipment Rental, Sign 6 Paint crew, Carpentry Shop, Survey Crew and Signal/Communications. cr Document storage will be included together with space for Police Department 11evi ence storage and vehicle searches. PO ENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1As escribed above - cost of $450,000 plus 8.4% interest; downpayment (already paid) $45,000 + 10 annual payments of $61,450.37. Combined total $614,503.70. CO T/IENEFIT ANALYSIS: N t available. However', it will take many years of improved efficiency to anortize the multi-million dollar. cost. The selected site is not as conveniently 1•cated relative to the CBD area, etc., and the NE 4th Street/NE 3rd Street corridor will often be a problem because of traffic density. OP IONS: 1 Continue to use existing shops. Continue to house Water Maintenance in 'temporary' leased property. 2 Continue to use existing shops but purchase or construct a building for Water Maint. 3 Downgrade the proposed New Facilities in size and features - commit to a long-range "Add-On" program over several years. PAGE 48a PROJECT 27 Proposed New Maintenance Shop Facilities 1 ., Right-of-Way (Acquisition) Costs Purchase of site from King County $ 614,503 2. Development Costs Architect Fees - Design & Construction Inspection $ 190,000 Entry Roadway $ 170,000 Water Main System $ 150,000 Site Development (paving, storm drainage, roads, landscaping, $ 555,000 lighting, fencing) Buildings , covered parking, gas pumps, car wash $3,076,125 Latecomer Fees: Sewer System Hook-up $ 10,00,0 $4,765,628 • PAGE 49 PROJECT 27 ' I ASSET # 5 Site: Present City Shop Site slue -- ! land: $348,500 improvements: Total: 5348,500 ($4.00 sq. ft.) Zoning: L-1 Size -- land area: 2 ± sq. ft. or acres improvements: sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. 'ppraisal Date: April, 1980 Notes: (background, comments, restrictions) The improvements that are currently located on the site would probably not add to the value of the property since the highest and best use of the site is probably medium density residential. PAGE 50 PROJECT 28 DEPARTMENT: Planning DEPT. PRIORITY * 2 CAPITAL PROJECT: Cedar River Trail Natural Zone - Acquisition ESTIMATE COST: Total $ Acquisition: Parker property - $250.000 (al ready acqui red) Thomas property - $260.000 Development: (See development proposal In Parks Department section. FINANCING: 1) General City Revenues 2) IAC Grant Provisions 3) H/C D Block Grant OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) 24 square feet acres acquired between 405 and Cedar River BN Bridge 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The City has previously purchased 24+_acres representing approximately 7,000 feet of r ver frontage. The proposed extension east to the C ount y's Cedar River Park will link nearly 4 miles of riverfront linear trail and recreational opportunities. Acquisition of the two remaining parcels could add between 35 and 90 acres of open pace, trail and varied recreational facilities. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The Parer parcel could consist of between 24 and 46 acres. The site is zoned SR-land a prior condemnation action set the value at $176,000. Additional site area is currently being negotiated. The Thomas parcel is unincorporated with a value of $260,000 proposed. Appraisal of the 50+_acre site will be required to confirm the cost estimate. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The proposed purchase will partially off-set the need for active recreation sites. Acquisition costs of neighborhood park acreage typically exceed $40,000 per acre. The proposed purchase is expected to cost approximately $8,000 per acre. OPT9075: No_irofect: Loss of utility of parcels 3, 3A, 3B consisting of 3+ acres. Parker Parcel only: If sufficient area and/or access can be obtained, the Cedar River Trail system could terminate at this location. ' ' � � PLOT PAN t wevan MANIC sot Parker- Property. 1710 CEDAR RIVER TRAIL NATURAL ZONE � c- `p m > p u) � + m ' CO � PAGE 52 DEPARTMENT: Planning DEPT. PRIORITY s 3 - PROJECT 29 CAPIT L PROJECT: Burnett Corridor-Senior Housing ESTIMATED COST: Total $ 400,000 Acquisition: $ 400,000 Development: Housing Authority (future) FINAN , ING: 1) H/CD Block Grant 2) Department of Housing and Urban Development (future construction) 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) $60,000 H/CD 1982 Grant 2) $60,000 H/C D 1982 Match ', If housing Implemented 3) Property owner agreeable to purchase proposal BACKGROUND: The Bu nett Corridor—Senior Housing project Is the final link in redevelopment of the N railroad line formerly located on Burnett Avenue South. This H/CD Block rant project calls for site acquisition for expansion of Cedar Terrace to be aiccomplished by the Housing Authority at a future time. Pedestrian access from tl1e Cedar River Trail to the central business district is also contemplated. 1 POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The' site is the former BN railroad right-of-way between Burnett Avenue South and ILogan Avenue South, north of South 2nd Street. The two prime parcels are the northerly one-half consisting of approximately one and one-half acres. A June, 1981, appraisal places the value at $225,000 for this area. The current L-1 zoning allows multiple family development..as proposed. CQ/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Costs cf other sites conveniently located to the Cedar Terrace development and Senior Center are anticipated to be twice as great. Availability of alternate sites is very limited in the Central Business District area. Use of this site provides for ]needed redevelopment of the existing eyesore. I Oki S No ro ect: Potential loss of current H/CD grant. Alternate Location: More costly purchase and future housing administration. I - PAGE 53 PROJECT 30 • DEPAR MENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY # 4 CRPIT L PROJECT: BURNETT PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR ESTIM,TED COST: TOTAL $ 200,000 ACQUISITION. $ DEVELOPMENT $ 200,000 FINAN, ING: 1) L.I.D. 2) H&CD 3) City Funding (none currently budgeted). OSTEN'IBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE 2) 3) , BICKG'OUND: This project would link the downtown business district with the Cedar River Trail arilo ing pedestrian movement and at the same time improving the aesthetics of the area. It would also complete the linear link-up along Burnett tying together Burnett Linear Park on the south, the Burnett Parking lot system and Cedar River. ,II POTEN IAL SITE: (location,' cost, zoning) The a andoned railroad right-of-way between Logan Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South extending northerly from 2nd Street to the river. Zoning along this corridor includes a'Imix ure of light industry, business, and multi-family. Cedar River Terrace senior housing is located adjacent to the corridor. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The a quisition development of this property will not only provide a permanent "(fink- p between downtown and the river but should stimulate renovation of businesses in th- area that have declined considerably over the years. The opportunity to purchase this and may soon be gone;as adjoining businesses are beginning to expand into the r ght of-way. Part of this land could be used for senior housing and the corridor path- way w uld allow ease of access to the downtown for a population group largely dependent on no -mechanized modes of travel. Eltim ted M&0 - $6,000 ' I I OPTIONS: 1',:) N Action (allow businesses to purchase and utilize). 1 2) C ntinue park & ride lot as a parking area for downtown business. 3) P pose L.I.D. for all:phases of project including M&O. II • PAGE 54 PROJECT 31 1 DEPARTIfIENT: Planning DEPT. PRIORITY s 5 CAPITAL PROJECT: Entry Point Enhancement ESTIMATED COST: Total $ 100.000 Acquisition: Minimal Development: $ 10-20,000 per entry FINANCING: 1) General City Revenues 2) Gas Tax 3) LJ.D. OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) 6 major points of entry (see attached) 2) 3) BACKGROUND: They City has a number of entry points/corridors with minimal, if any, Identification and,beeutification. This proposal will provide for installation of landscaping and'signing of key locations to enhance the City's image with the traveling public. Enhancement would be constructed with concurrent street improvements. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1) Rainier Avenue North at airport entry 2) Sunset Boulevard North at FAI-405 3) Maple Valley Highway at Maplewood Roadside Park 4) pt ai ni er Avenue South at 405 5) ! prady Way S.W. at Valley Parkway 6) Sunset .Boulevard S.W. at Powell S.W. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The minimal Improvement costs should be readily off-set by the Improvement in t'he Citys Image. Additional street tree and private property improvements along the "entry" corridors will dramatically enhance the character of the community, its me chants and employers. OPTI S: No project Lesser number of locations i 1 . .. \' '‘ i L 1 .... t.I i , R 7 . `•� Et — PAGE 51 \ \ i 1\ PROJECT 1 -.-. 1 • LAKE ' • _-' '�I it 1 WASHINGTON 1 INNtrie 16:: IP JAX111,. •� igf" i .� ' i 1 / V110. Li c'•r- RAINIER AVENUE NORTH � Entry & Street Trees Ti 1 41 nil 1 •Lift WO )11 i ' \_ , : \\\çEIN:SUNSET BLVD. NORTH 100 • 1 . 11 Entry & Street Trees It116114j11 I' h with street widening 441 •-•- I PAC. CAR akSi ' / Milli 11 FO ND'i i WO.41 I — J. IL ) - - - 1 i ( ' *t4P . t7.-1 --- • 14■ . I ki) • % lip- p •""" "'. \ Street Trees with � / � -, �'�%. Developm- t , u` ,"' Street Trees with i.l,lif . Developmen i i 1v 9V\ '/ • t:e..• illyit Plr i ppir . mid g ....j,. il \ SUNSET BLVID. WEST op , ‘‘‘‘ ntry &, Street Trees - �'. i, _ , - 1_2. 7 - Street Trees with Developmen 01111W7,e. MAPLEWOOD ROADSIDE • N I . Entry & Street Tree- 050000) .....-4;;;;- • • .r►�;-1-n.1°g12.i5._5-1_5 -% ) „...rj' . . - ; 0, ', 1 -i. :'':r 1\ itl .. A."-• i ) 1 Ia RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH . I) �. r Entry at freeway terminous iikk* . S.f W. GRADY WAY ' Entry with Grady Way Bridge vr.....;.., vsof : ji, . 4.. • , — I .•--+ • PAGE 56 PROJECT 32 � I DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY II 6 CAPITAL PROJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRAIL DEVELOPMENT/NATURAL ZONE ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 590.000 ACQUISITION $ DEVELOPMENT $ FIN NCING: 1) H&CD 2) City - No funding currently available. 3) IAC - Potential funding source for 60 to 70 percent of the total cost of park development. 4) EDA - If program were refunded and project selected: 5) County Bond Issue - If the proposed bond issue is successful (1980 or 19!1) this is a potential project (City and County participation possible). OS ENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) NONE BACKGROUND: Acquisition of property currently underway. Project would link up with existing Cedar River Trail (Urban Zone). POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) East of Highway 405 along the Cedar River to the King County Regional Park east of M Iplewood Golf Course. Some portions are currently under City ownership. • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: T e cost of constructing and maintaining this section of the Trail system should be considerably less than the Urban or Industrial sections. The benefits to the public will be equal to or greater than that offered by the other sections due to the natural amenities offered by the site which are not available elsewhere on the trail. Develop- mInt costs are inflating rapidly, so construction costs would be lessened. Estimated M&O Costs - $40,000. OPTIONS: 1) No Action (serve trail users with existing facilities). 2) Maintain area in natural state as a conservancy with the City's role being that of stewardship. 3) Develop the trail for minimal access and use only. PAGE 57 PROJECT 33 DEPARTMENT: Planning DEPT. PRIORITY s 7 CAPITAL PROJECT: Wetland/Wildlife Habitat/Recreation Acquisition Green River Valley ES TED COST: Total $ 600,000 - 1,250,000 Acquisition: $ Same Development: $ To be determined FINANCING: 1) Benefit Area Charges 2) Donations 3) Eastside Watershed Project OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Renton Wetlands 2) 3) BACKGROUND: During the fall of 1980, the Planning Department prepared a Wetland Study evaluating all significant wetland areas In Renton. The Planning Commission is currently evaluating the report and is expected to recommend policy actions for Council consideration by the end of 1981.. The most probable recommendation will be the purchase of all or portions of the significant wetlands Identified in the study. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) *1 Black River Riparian Forest (north of Earitngton Golf Course) * Additions to the Renton Wetlands (S.W. 27th west of Lind Avenue S.W.) Panther Creek wetlands (east side of SR 167) All of the above locations have varying levels of importance from an environmental and storm water/flood control standpoint. Each has varying degrees of cost, potential for development, and participation (i.e. dedication) by property owners. U,po a final selection by the City, a plan for acquisition can be developed. CO/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The costs of allowing development of any of these sites is considerable in environ- mental terms. Purchase by the City would reduce the necessity for filling and thus removal of vital flood run-off storage. Wildlife enhancement including fish runs would be added benefits. OPT ON& No project. Altenate� sites - A total of 14 sites have been identified. A cost/benefit analysis should be used to distinguish between available alternatives. PAGE 58 PROJECT 34 DEPARTMENT: Planning DEPT. PRIORITY * 8 CAPITAL PROJECT: Lake Washington Boulevard Bikeway ESTIMATED COST: Total $ 100,000 Acquisition: $ Minimal Development: $ 100,000 FIN/iNCING: 1) Local Improvement District � I 2) H/CD Block Grant 3) DOT-Bicycle Grant Program OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Existing undeveloped street right-of-ways 2) Coulon Beach Park 3) BACKG7OUND: • The LLake Washington Boulevard Bikeway is one of five regional links that joins a total bicycle network In South King County. It is the major link between bicycle facilities In Bellevue and those In Renton and South King County. The route is aparit of Renton's bicycle plan and has been identified in the King County General Bicycle Plan: Focus 1990, and the King County Urban Trails Plan. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) ThelLake Washington Boulevard Bikeway is located on the eastern shore of Lake Washington between the central business district and the Kennydale neighborhood to the north. It Is approximately 3.9 miles in length and extends from the intersection of Riverside Drive and Bronson Way to the May Creek Interchange of FAI-405 at N.E. 44th Street. The route will follow Park Avenue North to 5th Street and then will turn east to Garden Avenue. It will then head in a northerly direction until linking with Lake Washington Boulevard. The route will then follow this course until reaching its terminus at N.E. 44th Street. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Alternative locations will reguire land acquisition in fee or by easement with the potential cost exceeding $8 per foot. The only alternative routes parallel to Lake Washington Boulevard are the BN railroad tracks (possible easement) andi I-40. Although the state is constructing a bikeway link between Newport Hill's and Ripley Lane, the freeway location is not desirable from a safety standpoint. OPTIONS: No !project--possible hazard on the current underdeveloped street BN ,ralroad—possible railroad opposition Freeway I-405—safety related considerations NG LA K E' \NA H.I l •' e) i \ 0 . � + K E V V A I ' se n"ST PAGE 5 RPN'TON PLAPJP I410 DEPT. ` APR IL Ig30 ' i PROJECT 34 �• i i aMao-_ _(....__Li_. . i \ ' I\ : 1 i 177 8- 3 ... 1 . A ______. 1 • L... is ________, \---....----- \ ''s. 1 • O *"•••_ 1 iE . LAKE Jai ' IIII • WASHINGTON �3 N. ;,! III UlfI - -._... : 1 ii III ' 41;1,;,',411.; 1 . , , .1 I a if V\ / 111? a 1 "l ► -: • \'"\\BoEING �' + 'r � _ r.I Z. ,..1 1 IF\ 1 _ r ` 1 . CAR deliii I {'®• V.. � FOUNDRY/ I, N _ ..•...r w.IMM. NoriliF PAGE 60 PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS IN PRIORITIZED ORDER GENERAL FUND Traffic Engineering 1 . Lighting Replacement 2. Traffic Signal Controller Modernization 3. Computer Enhancement ENTERPRISE FUND Ai retort 1 . ADAP Fencing Installation 2. Water Main Upgrading 3. Overlay of Taxiway "A" 4. Water Main - Complete Loop System 5. Microwave Landing System WATERWORKS UTILITY FUND Water Projects 1 . Construct Well #9 Pump Station 2. Complete CBD Transmission Line '3. Construct West Hill Reservoir (1 MG) 4. Install 16" Transmission Line - Aberdeen Ave. NE from NE 14th St. to NE 28th St. 5. Construct South Talbot Hill Reservoir (1 .5 MG) Sewer Projects '1 1 . Install May Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer Main 2. Sewer Lift Station - NE 4th and Union Ave. NE 3. Replace Sewer Line - Mill Ave. S. to Shattuck Ave. S. , Houser Way S. to Cedar River 4. Replace Sewer Line - Main Ave. S. to Shattuck Ave. S. , Railroad Tracks to Grady Way 5. Replace N. 3rd St. to Bronson Way, Burnett Ave. N. to Houser Way 16. Replace N. 6th St. to N. 3rd St. , Burnett Ave. N. to I Garden Ave. N. — PAGE 61 PROJECT 35 - I ©EPA TNENT: Public Works/Traffic Engineering Division DEPT. PRIORITY CAPI AL PROJECT: Lighting Replacement ESTI TED COST: TOTAL $ 100,000 Acquisition $ 100,000 Development $ FINANCING: 1) General Funds 2) Arterial Street Fund (1/2t Gas Tax) 3) Airport Funds OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) Street Light Luminaires 2) 3) ISAC ROUND: As part of its efforts to conserve energy, the Traffic Engineering Division has initiated a program of replacing existing luminaires with more energy conservative uni s. Surprisingly enough, because of advances in technology, we have been able i to rovide the same amount of illumination. As we replace these units, we will be able to turn on lights which we turned off as a part of our energy reduction program. I ' POTENTIAL SITE: (location. cost. zoning) The following are locations and changes we are suggesting: 1. N 3rd/N 4th Sts. - Logan to 3rd P1. (60) 400 W Mercury Vapor to 150 W Sodium Vapor 2. Airport Perimeter Road (29) 400 W Mercury Vapor to 150 W Sodium Vapor 3. Grady Way S - Main to Rainier (55) 400 W Mercury Vapor to 250 W Sodium Vapor 4. Bronson Way - Factory to Mill (36) 400 W Mercury Vapor to 250 W Sodium Vapor 15. Airport Way - Logan to Rainier (20) 400 W Mercury Vapor to 250 W Sodium Vapor 6. Downtown Area (150) '400 W Mercury Vapor to 250 W Sodium Vapor CO T/OENEFIT ANALYSIS: Be efit = 00,0 $283 380 = 2.83 C st 100 Using today's energy cost expanded over the .30 anticipated life years of the luminaires versus the $100,000 initial outlay, we realize a benefit cost ratio of 2.83. This is above the social impacts of energy conservation which are not.as easily measurable. OITIONS: Tle other option is to continue with a program of eliminating existing luminaires from service. This is undesirable in that the basic reasons behind street lighting - Ticular, pedestrian and vandalism protection - are still valid. If future energy frecasts are realized, we may be forced to turn off luminaires even with the proposed replacement program. The condition without energy conservative luminaires may be unacceptable. I I PAGE 62 ' PROJECT 36 • DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Traffic Engineering Division DEPT. PRIORITY / 2 CAPITAL PROJECT: Traffic Signal Controller Modernization I � ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 200,000 Acquisition $ 200,000 Development FINANCING: 1) General Funds 2) Federal Aid Safety Projects (FASP)/Federal Aid Urban Systems (FAUS) 3) Arterial Street Fund (1/U Gas Tax) 4) System Development Fees OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) 20 used traffic signal controllers 2) , 3) BAC ROUND: The City has a total of 20 traffic signal controllers which are atypical to our standard Multiponic unit. Consequently, we are unable to control them with the existing master computer. Furthermore, 13 of the existing controllers were purchased in 1968 and 7 were Purcl!ased in 1972. Although the units purchased in 1972 are relatively new, that was the last year that particular controller was manufactured. We have been able to acquire p'arte for these units; however, future acquisition is not assured. Also, electronic equipment has undergone extensive improvement over the last several years. Improvements have been made in the areas of flexibility, durability and economy of operation and rain enance. POT NTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The ollowing locations are suggested for controller replacement: 1. lE Sunset Blvd. & Union Ave. NE 8. Sunset Blvd. N 6 N Park Drive 2. E Sunset Blvd. & NE i'2th St. 9. NE Sunset Blvd. & Duvall Ave. NE 3. NE Sunset Blvd. & NE 10th St. 10. Park Ave. N 6 N 6th St. 4. NE Sunset Blvd. 6 Harrington Ave. NE 11. Park/Garden/Lake Wash. Blvd. N 5. unset Blvd. NE & NE 7th St. 12. N 4th St. & Factory Ave. N 6'. unset Blvd. N & N 3rd St. 13. N 4th St. & Garden Ave. N j, E Sunset Blvd. & Edmonds Ave. NE 14. N 4th St. & Park Ave. N (cont. on P. 2) COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The benefits of replacing the controllers listed above are numerous. From the traffic ope ational standpoint, these new controllers have greater flexibility in responding to xisting traffic demand. This'will provide additional capacity for already con ested intersections, provide energy savings in the neighborhood of 1,600 gallons • Hof uel per intersection per year, enhance the operation of emergency vehicle preemption las ell as provide for potential future connection to the City's master traffic signal I com uter. From the safety standpoint, it will give us the option of providing protected turning movements to alleviate accident situations. Maintenance will be less and parts will be easier to obtain. OPTIONS: As the existing,units are no longer manufactured, there does not exist substantial opportunity to improve the existing situation with existing equipment. This equipment is simply not compatible; with equipment now being manufactured. If we allow the si uation to continue, we will continually be faced with the question of reliability an our ability to repaiir the equipment in a timely and cost effective manner i � I PAGE 63 PROJECT 36 CAPITAL, PROJECT: Traffic Signal Controller Modernization POTENTIAL ITE: (cont.) 15. N 4th St. & Williams Ave. N 16. N '4th St. & Logan Ave. N 17. N 3rd St. & Williams Ave. N 18. N 3rd St. & Park Ave. N 19. N 3rd St. & Garden Ave. N 20. N 3rd St. & Factory Ave. N I 1 1 1 1 PAGE 64 PROJECT 37 • • I I DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Traffic Engineering Division DEPT. PRIORITY / CAPIT PROJECT: Computer Enhancement ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 220,000.00 Acquisition $ Development $ FINANCING: 1) Federal Aid 'Urban Systems. (FADS) 2) Arterial Street Fund (1/2G Gas Tax) 3) Systems Development Funds OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) existing Multisonics Traffic Signal Computer 2) 3) _ __ - I IIICKCIROUND: In 19 3 the City purchased a traffic signal computer to complement the traffic control syste that was installed. The existing computer has the capability of controlling appro Cimately 40 intersections. However, the City currently has 70 signalized inter- sects ns. Also, this particular computer is no longer available; so it is difficult to obtain parts. Because of its age we are also beginning to experience computer failure. The proposed project would replace the existing main computer. OTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) Traffic Engineering Division, fourth floor, Renton Municipal Building. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The 1froposed project would replace the existing central core of the computer with an updaed model. This would allow us to control from the office all of the existing 70 signalized intersections. Additionally, we would be able to interface with the new 011 controllers which we are installing. The existing computer cannot coordinate because the systems are not compatible. The new controllers have greater flexibility Which we discussed under the Controller Modernization project. OPTIONS: The Iption would be to keep the existing system and hope that we can secure replace- �ment parts as necessary. Also we would not be able to supervise the new 911 controllers. Eventually, as we need to; replace the controllers, we will lose all master control of cur system. Therefore, if master control is desirable, which we believe it is, we will have to replace the computer in the near future. 1 - 1 I i ' PAGE 65 PROJECT 38 Airport WAR ENT: Public Works/Airport DEPT. PRIORITY / '1 CAIPIT PROJECT: ADAP Fencing Installation II ESTI TED COST: TOTAL $ 125,000 I ' Acquisition $ - 0 - Development $ 125,000 FINANCING: 1) Federal ADAP @ 80% = $100,000 2) Airport Funds P 20% =S 25.000 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) • 2) • 3) BACKGROUND: FAA inspections of Airport facilities have resulted in a determination that certain areas need to be fenced to comply with federal operating and safety standards. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) I . . COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Compliance with federal requirements and potentially a reduction in liability exposure. 40TEI ADAP funding decision might be made during 1981. (Project is listed in 1981 Budget) OPTIONS: i • PAGE 66 PROJECT 39 Airport DEPARTMENT: Public Works (Airport) DEPT. PRIORITY / 2 CAPIT PROJECT: Water Main - Upgrading ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 140,000 Acquisition $ Development $ 140,000 FINANCING: 1) Airport 2) 3) • OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) 1 2) 1 3) BACKGROUND: (a) 12" and 16" Intertie at northwest corner, between Rainier Ave. and newly constructed 8" main to the Sunbird Restaurant will remove this service from Boeing Agreement. ($34,000) (b) 8" and 12" Water Service Extension to Control Tower from Rainier Ave. at N.W. 6th St. (Abandon old leaking 2" line). ($34,000) (c) 12" Water Service Extension, Logan Bridge to Boeing Bridge. Tie in new 12" line to Renton's water system - provide more reliable water service to southeast corner; remove fire line POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) from Boeing System, allowing Renton system to provide domestic service. ($72,000) NOTE: Each project element, i.e. (a), (b) and (c), might have to be contracted separately, depending upon budget, etc. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: 1 !OPT ONS: PAGE 67 PROJECT 40 Airport DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Airport DEPT. PRIORITY API AL PROJECT: Complete Overlay of Taxiway "A" ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 117 nnn - I Acquisition $ -.0 - Dawlopmont $ 337.000 1 �I CING: 1) Federal ADAP @ 80% = $269,600 1 2) Airport Funds @ 20% $ 67,400 .3) • OSTE SIDLE ASSETS: 1) • 2) 3) BAC ROUND: Recommended in Airport Master Plan Possible 1982 if ADAP Funds are available. ►OTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) . • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Reduced liability exposure. • OPTIONS: • i I PAGE 68 PROJECT 41 Ifte.45RS DCPAR ENT: Public Works (Airport) DEPT.-PRIORITY / 1 CAPIT PROJECT: Water Main - Completion of Loop System ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 108,000 Acquisition $ , Development $ 108,000 FINANCING: 1) 2) 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) 2) 3) 11iACKGROUND: Complete a, loop system around the Airport by extending main along east and north sides to the northwest corner. i I POTENTIAL SITE: (location. cost. zoning) COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The benefits to the completion of the watermain loop would be the reliability of the system as well as improved fire flow capacity. It also would allow the installation of fire hydrants in that area of the airfield. • (OPTIONS: � F PAGE 69 PROJECT 42 Airport DEPARTMENT: Public Wnrkc/Airport DEPT. PRIORITY / CAP TAL PROJECT: Microwave Landing System EST MATED COST: TOTAL $ 250.000 Acquisition $ - 0 - Development $ 250,000 CFI LING: 1) FPdera1 AnAP Funds (d inns = S7S(_nnn 2) 3) I OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) ' 2) 3) BACKGROUND: Possible 1987 or 1988 timing. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) COS /BENEFIT ANALYSIS: OPT ONS: PAGE 70 PROJECT 43 • DEPARTMENT: Utility Department DEPT. PRIORITY / 1 CAPI AL PROJECT: Construction of Well #9 Pump Station ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 150,000.00 Acquisition $ . -0- Development $ 150,000.00 FINANCING: 1) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund 2) Referendum #38 - Municipal Water Supply Funding Program 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I). 2) 3) BACKGROUND: When Well #8 was drilled and constructed in 1968, an exploratory well was also drilled. This was used as an observation well at that time, with the eventual use to be as the site of future Well #9. The existing 8" casing will be pulled and an appropriate size casing installed. Due to the possible conflicts with the D.S.H.S. and well construction in the Cedar River this project should be done as soon as possible. The facility will provide additional water supply to the City's supply. This will allow for continued growth and expansion of Renton. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The site for future Well #9 will be at the present observation well location in the N.E. corner of the Cedar River'Park. There should be no cost for the site and no zoning problems. • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The City of Renton can pump water from the Cedar River Basin at a lesser cost than if water was purchased from the City of Seattle (The only other water purveyor in the area). All existing watermains in this area have' been designed to accept water from proposed future well sites. OPTIONS: a) Purchase water from the City of Seattle at an increased cost. b) Remain as is, and eventually be short of water supply to serve the City of Renton. PAGE 71 I PROJECT 44 l I p DEPARTMENT: Utility Department DEPT. PRIORITY / 2 CAPITAL PROJECT: Complete installation of 24" transmission watermain thru the C.B.D. ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 350,000.00 • Acquisition $ -0- Dew lopmant $ 350,000.00 Utility 1) Capital Outlay - U y Fund 2) I 3) , ' OS-ENSIOLE ASSETS: 1) 1 2) 3) • II KGROUND: ' This project was first proposed in the 1965 Water Study Compre- 1 hensive:Plan. It was also one of the projects proposed in the 1975 Water & Sewer Bond Issue. The completion of this trans- mission line will balance the flows from the Talbot Hill Reservoir and the Mt. Olivet Reservoir. This project will increase the fire flows and reliability of the system in the C.B.D. and also improve the entire water system reliability. P'TENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The location of the remaining portions of this project are in Talbot Road South from South Grady Way to South Renton Village Place; Burnett Avenue South from Houser Way South to South Tobin Street; South Tobin Street from Burnett Avenue South to Williams Avenue ,South; Williams Avenue South from South Tobin Street ! to South Riverside Drive; South Riverside Drive from Williams Avenue South to Wells Avenue South; across Wells Avenue Bridge , to North Riverside Drive; then in North Riverside Drive to Liberty Park and then thru Liberty Park to Wells #1 and #2. TThhm�r will be no cost for right-of-way for the watermain. CiST/BENEFIT AMAL`►515: '1 This will increase the fire flows and reliability of the C.B.D. as well as the reliability of the entire water system. . PTIONS: I Remain the same. . i PAGE 72 PROJECT 45 DEP RTMENT: Utility Department DEPT. PRIORITY I �3_ CA ITAL PROJECT: Construction of West Hill 1 MG Reservoir ES IMATED COST: TOTAL $ 1,000,000.00 Acquisition $ -0- Development $ 1,000,000.00 FINANCING: 1) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund 2) D.S.H.S. Referendum #38, Municipal Water Supply Funding Program 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) 2) 3) BA' KGROUND: The West Hill is served by water purchased from the City of Seattle. There is insufficient water supply for fire protection in some areas of West Hill. The only storage presently available is in the City of Seattle Transmission line. The City of Seattle imposes a penalty charge of what is called a demand charge when a system has insufficent storage. Renton is presently paying this penalty. al P'TENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The City owns one potential site presently on N.W. 4th Street at 84th Avenue South. The latest design might require a different site.. This new proposed site would be at Thompson School which is located at South 123rd Street at 82nd Avenue South in King County. The use of this site would have to be negotiated with the Renton School District. There could be zoning or King County opposition to the construction of an elevated tank at this site. C'ST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The cost benefit would be the elimination of the demand change for lack .of storage that Renton is presently paying to the City of Seattle. Additional benefits would be in improved system reliability and fire flow capability. OPTIONS: Remain the same. PAGE 73 PROJECT 46 , 1 . 1 DE ARTMENT: UTILITY DIVISION DEPT. PRIORITY / I . 1 ITAL PROJECT: Install 16" transmission water main in Aberdeen Ave. N.E. from ' N.E. 14th St. to N.E. 28th St. , 1 ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 200,000.00 Acquisition $ A -0- Development $ 200,000.00 _ FINANCING: 1) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund 2) 3) • TENSISLE ASSETS: I) • 2) . - . 3) --- MCKGROUND: This project was in the 1965 water study. It would improve the fire flows to NW section of the Highlands, but is basically designed to increase the fire flows n the lower Kennydale area where there is anticipated commercial and multifamily rowth in the near future. I I TENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) 1 he location of this project is all in public right-of-way of Aberdeen Ave. NE. herefore there is no costs for property involved. 1 ' ST/IENEFIT ANALYSIS: The benefit of this project would be increased fire flows to the aforementioned areas. OPTIONS: Remain the same, and limit building and development to meet the existing fire flows the system can presently deliver. r 1 I 1 1 ' ! PAGE 74 I PROJECT 47 I i DEPARTMENT: UTILITY DEPARTMENT DEPT. PRIORITY CAPITAL PROJECT: South Talbot Hill Reservoir (1.5 mg) ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 700,000.00 Acquisition $ , 50,000.00 Development $ 650,000.00 ! FINANCING: I) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund 2) 3) I OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) 2) 3) BACKGROUND: . T e reliability of any water supply is the capability of supplying water under a verse conditions such as power failures, etc., and at a quantity to meet the r quirements or demands' of the system. The 350 ft. hydraulic pressure zone that t is proposed reservoir would serve is presently planned to meet its fire service d mands by pumping water through the south Talbot Hill Pump Station. The system i intertie with two pressure reducing stations to the Rolling Hills elevated tank s stem. These interties alone are not sufficient to supply the complete system d mands. PO ENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) The approximate location of the site for this proposed reservoir is just south of C4rr Road and west of the Benson Rd. (SR 515) extended. The cost of the site is estimated to be $50,000.00 I ! 1 j C ST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: 1 T e benefit would be increased reliability of the existing system. I TIONS: Remain as is. , 1 • PAGE 75 PROJECT 48 1 d DEPARTMENT: Public Works DE►T. PRIORITY / 1 CAPITAL PROJECT: Install May Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer Mains ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 2,000,000.00 Acquisition $ . -0- Development $ 2,000,000.00 FINANCING: I) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund 2) 3) OiTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) 2) 3) BACKGROUND: The northeast section of town where the Sunset Lift Station exists has insufficient capacity to handle the existing sewage presently being generated. There is a moratorium on the building in this area presently. 1 . POTENTIAL SITE: (location. cost, zoning) The site location is down the ravines of the May Creek and Honey Creek :. basins. Utility easements will be aquired for the proposed installatibn. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The benefit of this installation would better serve the existing users • in this area as well as stop the overflowing of the existing lift station into the May Creek basin. This system will also provide sewage capacity for future growth. 1 OPTIONS: • Remain the same or reconstruct lift station, force main, and down stream .. gravity system through the highlands. • • PAGE 76 PROJECT 49 • • DEPARTMENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY / 2 CAPITAL PROJECT: Construct Sanitary Sewer lift statinn at N F 4th R !Minn Ava N.E. . i ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 100,000.00 Acquisition $ •-0- D.wlopmsnt $ 100,000.00 FINANCING: 1) Capital Outlay - Utility Fund . 2) 3) • ENSIOLE ASSETS: OS I) •T 2) 'I 3) ------- BACKGROUND: Growth of the City in the southeast area of the highlands through annexation will require that a lift station be installed to serve this additional area. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) • Intersection of N.E. 4th Street and Union Ave. N.E. • q • • COST/ ENEFIT ANALYSIS: Additional lands will be allowed to be serviced by sanitary sewers. . 11. OPTI S: • • Remain the same. Construct hravity sewer main from N.E. 4th St. and Union Ave. 'N.E. down to the metro Cedar River Trunk d PAGE 77 PROJECT 50 • DEPARTMENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY / ' I CAPITAL PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Replacement - Mill Ave. S. to Shattuck Ava C Houser Way S. to Cedar River. ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 7oo.0on.nn Acquisition $ -0- Devalopsrnt $ 700,000.00 • FINANCING: 1) 2) 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) • 2) 3) • BACKGROUND: The mains in the aforementioned area are approximately 50 years old and are no longer in an maintainable condition. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) City right-of-way • • • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Reduced maintence costs and elimination of possible damage claims against. the City from sewage back-ups. • •• OPTIONS: • 1 Remain as is. 7.1 I � PAGE 78 PROJECT 51 • DEPARTMENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY I CAPITAL PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Replacement - Main Ave. S. to ShAtturk Ave S., R/R tracks to Grady Way ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 600,000.00 Acquisition $ Development $ F INANC I NG: 1) . 2) 3) • OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) • . 2) • • 3) • 11ACKCROUND: 1 . • . POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost. zoning) • 1 • • • COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: • OPTIONS: • 1 �I PAGE 79 PROJECT 52 DEPARTMENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY / i CAPITAL PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Replacement - N. 3rd St. to Rrnncnn Wi Burnett Ave. N. to Houser Way. ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 700,000.00 Acquisition $ Development $ FIPANCING: 1) • . 2) 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: I) • I 2) 3) BACKGROUND: _ I • I .. POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) • 1 COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS: ' � I • • • • I . OPTI S: •• • ' I PAGE 80 PROJECT 53 • d DEPIAR ENT: Public Works DEPT. PRIORITY CAPITAL PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Replacement - N. 6th St. to N. 3rd St. . Burnett Ave. N. to Garden Ave. N. ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL $ 600,000.00 Acquisition $ Development $ FINANCING: 1) Z) 3) OSTENSIBLE ASSETS: 1) • I 2) 3) BACKGROUND: • POTENTIAL SITE: (location, cost, zoning) d . COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: I I � � OPTIONS: • • PAGE 81 • SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1982 — 1987 1 CI PRIO TY # ANNUAL ELEMENT PROJECTS -ITGrady Way Bridge Replacement Renton Area Transportation Study Miscellaneous Street Improvements - East Valley Road, SW 16th St. to SR 167 ramps SW 27th St., East Valley Road to Valley Parkway SW NE 4th St./NE 3rd St. from Union Ave. NE to Sunset Blvd. North I7 Wells Avenue Bridge Replacement Illggg Williams Ave. North & North 3rd/North 4th Streets Intersection Improvements 9 Factory Ave. North & North 3rd St. Intersection Improvements 10 Logan Ave. South & South 2nd St. Intersection Improvements • 11 Burnett Ave. S; & S 2nd St. Intersection Improvements 12 Sunset Blvd. North & North 3rd Intersection Improvements 13 Talbot Road South, South 16th St. to South 41st St. 14 SW 16th St., Lind Ave. SW to Monster Road SW South 7th St.,' Rainier Ave. South to Smithers Ave. South ;56 Controller Modernization 17 Computer Enhancement SECOND YEAR PROJECTS 18 SW Grady Way, Lind Ave. SW to Longacres Dr. SW 19 Monster Road SW - alternate access THIRD YEAR PROJECTS 20 Garden Ave. North, North 4th St. to North 8th St. 21 Monroe Ave. NE, NE 6th St. to NE 12th St. FOURTH — SIXTH YEAR PROJECTS 2 Valley Parkway SW, SW Grady Way to South 140th St. 3 North 1st St., Park Ave. North to Burnett Ave. North 4 Monroe Ave. NE, NE 2nd St. to NE 4th St. 5 NE 12th St., Edmonds Ave. NE to Kirkland Ave. NE 26 Lind Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way 27 Sunset Blvd. North, Bronson Way North to FAI 405 8 Valley Parkway SW, SW 41st St. to SW 16th St. F9 Valley Parkway SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way 30 Lake Wash. Blvd. North, North Park Drive to North City Limits 31 SW 27th St., Valley Parkway SW to West Valley Road 32 SE Puget Drive, Jones Place SE to Edmonds Ave. SE 33 Sunset Blvd. NE, FAI 405 to NE Park Drive 34 Benson Road South, South Grady Way to SE 31st St. 35 Taylor Ave. NW/Taylor Place NW, Renton Ave; Ext. to Stevens Ave. NW 36 NE 12th St., Lynnwood Ave. NE to Union Ave. NE 37 Union Ave. NE, NE Sunset Blvd. to NE 24th St. 38 Edmonds Avenue Extension II - • s A 1-2 3t-X. YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1912_ TO 1987 Page 1 of 6 • — OBLIGATION PROGRAM — Hearing bate July 20, 1981 — -- • _Adoption Date July 27. 1981 _ City/County _Keypunching Note:Data entered in cote I-B must -EXHIBIT--"A" - -24-10-yP 9 Resolution Number &NIT°. 1.0.7-1-0-a=.o be-en-all-cards-punchedLfrorn ti . County No. 1 7 7-8 this•form. o v PRO-J.ECT.CO5T5•1N THOUSANDS OF'DO-LL. R5 o PROJECT IDENTIFICATION • ec n " OBLIGATION SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE 2 Tit le,Route,Road Log No., Section No., o Work Total a •Id __-Y_E A: F� Location Termini Deecrl Lion of Work, ,.3 Length \.o FEDERAL TOTAL • u Beginning Milepoet bridge No. 04. Code (Mi es) 'r(An�oa1 2 nd 3 rd 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL FUNDS 1 1 a 0 Element) ft GM AMOUNT PROGRAM :i 8 5- 4. 5 078 9 . .10 . II 12 13 - 14 15 16. IT`! .. A5„6 57 40 41 44 iv 48 47 MI ' N 52..'_- . 53 so Se Ge Cape rn* . 91 X 73 76 73 60 Be _ G,R,ALD,Y, 1W,A,Yt ,B,R,IID,G,E, ,RIE,P,LIALC,EIMIEIN 4 AB f/G , ,DIH ,OL1LO M U X ,41115. ,- , 1 , , , , a I 1 1 6 ,31312. 1 1BIR.•, 1 1 a 1 t813, 1 , 141115, 1' Bridge Replacement (joint with Tukwila) - Plans, - L - -- - _ - - Bridge _ _ Forward Specifications & Estimates Only �� Repl. Thrust - - 2, R1E,NIT,OINI IA,R,E,A, IT'R,A,N,_SIP,O,R,T, 1SiT,U,DiY 8MIU, 1 , I 1 , U 1 1310 1 ,610 , ,3,0 lit , t 1 , I i , lit 11,2,0 t , 1l,210 Develop a multiaxial transportation plan for the l;.r City. 3. M,IIS,C,E,L,LiA,NIEjO,U,S, 1SITIRIEIElT, IItMIPiRIO,V 4r% D, , , , 4 , U 111110 1 1918 al,,lt0 121210 I I I I 1 I , I i 0,3,8 t 1 151318 Street Division Five-Year Plan (overlays) I�z¢tkri 146 • I 4 E, ,V,A,L,LiE,Y, , S,W, ,l,6,T,H, 1T,O, ,S, R, 11,6,7, 2IlBIDiF■G 1146,0 C U 410,0,0 t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. 1 1 4,0,,0 0 , ,4,0,0, 0 . Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, illumin- H J 100% ation, channelization, 44' roadway LID 5. S1W, 1217,TIH1 ,El ,V,AIL,L, IT1Ot ,V,AILILI ,P,KIWIY 11y/,A,B,D,F ,0A6,8 S U 1,5,0,0 I I t ill 1 I , ill III 1 1 1 1,5,0,0 1 ,115, 0, 0 Grading, drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, GHIJ 100% illumination, signal, bike route, channelization, L M 0 LID - landscaping, bridge, 44' roadway 6. N.E. ,4,T,H,/,3,R,D, ,M,O0N1R101E, ,T,O, 1S.U,N,SLE1T 2 r BID,F,G 104415 M U ,310,0 1 , 1 I , , 1 1 1 I I t 1 1 , 1. 11 13,0,0 , , ,3,010 Drainage, resurface, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and H 100% widen to 5 lanes (2-way left turn lane) LID 7,- W,E,LIL,S, ,A,VIE, ,B,R,I,DIGIE, IR.IE,PILtA,C,E,M,EIN 4 /A,B,F,G, ,040,4 S U,X 110100 ,6,8,0 , , , , I '1 1131414 1 , t t , 1 13,3t6 1 ,1,6,810 Bridge Replacement H J L Bridge Forward Repl. Thrust 8.- W,I,L,L,I,A,M,Si IA,V,E, IN.3,R,D,/,NI4,T,H, 1I,M,PIR 6V/4H,K,L, , _4 I MU 1 Ili0 , 1 , 1 1 1 i I i I , 1 ill III 1 11,0 1 1 1 11,0 a Signal modifications, channelization and signing cl , m V a, • D15TRI Bull oN t., I COPY DISTRICT STATE AID ENGINLER _ -007 ulo-e49- I COPY C,R.A.15,(COUN.T16e ONLY)- - -- - Jars. MOO - - - _ SA R. • SIX- YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19 8Z, TO 19 87., Page 2 of 6 ' • — OBLIGATION PROGRAM — Nearing Date July 20, 1981 - EXHIBIT "A" Adoption Date July 27. 1981 City/County Keypunching Motes Data entered in cote 8 must -- - Resolut=ian=Nurober_ 2410 City-No. 1 0 710 s_-I. be on all cards punched from II • County No. 1 7 7-8 thirri. 1 k P R-Ord-EC-T—COSTB1-N-11-10USANDBLOF'DO_:LABS • PROJECT IDENTIFICATION "oY G 1 OBLIGATION-:5CHEDUL2 .FUNDING SOURCE o Title,Route,Road LogNo., Section s Total ed ` No., moo. Work gab Y_E A. R FEDERAL .TOTAL• Location/Termini,Deecription of Work, 03 Code Length .0\,a 1st nBeginning Milepost 4 Bridge No. -e o (Miles) .� t(���ua1 2 not 3 rd 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL FUNDS I.. e- a S Element) #6 th AMOUNT PROGRAM _2 " S- 4 5 g 78 9 .10 . 11 12. ' 13 - 14 15 16. IT'y y .. ei!a :,,a7 44 4S ee 47 4e . N'R..._ E5 10 e9 CO p 04 6140 71 It15 74 ;sae as F,A,CIT,OIRIyI ,A1V1E, ,Si ,N, 131RID, IIIM1PIRIOIVIE 61 MIKLIJY1 tit S U , •1 'S, i• , , , , , 1 , 1 1 1 , Morn ,'1 J , , I I 15. 1 1 1 1 15. 9' Signal modifications, channelization and_.signing _ - V' - - - 10. L,OtG,A,N, ,ALV,E, .6, IS, 121N,D, ,IIM,P,R,OLV,EIMIE 6 M H,K,I, , l , M U , , 15 , 1 i Ito I i I 1 1 1 ' to 1 I . 11 15 5 Signal modifications, channelization and signing BIUIRINIEIT,T, ,A1ViRI ,&, IS, ,21NID, 1IIMIPIR,O,V1E 6 H,K,II , 4 , M U 1 1210 I , 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 Ili III , 1 , 1 12,0 1 1 1 1210, 1,/ 11. Channelization modifications, possible signalization and signing. • S.UIN,S,E.TI .B,LIV.D, IN, ,61 IN' 13,R.11 1I,M,PIR,0 6 /eAiBID,F I j I MU 1110,0 I it III II I 1 „ i I I 1 i 1 04,010 , 1 111010 12. Signal improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, H I channelization, paving and signing • 13. T,A,L,B10,T, ,RED, ,SI 1116,T1H, 1T,O, 1SI 1411,S,T1 2M B,D.F.G 11010 C U I I , i , , 161010 1 1 1 I I I 1 I , • 1 1 , 161010 1 1 ,6,010 Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination, H J 15% channelization (joint with King County) LID • 14. S.W. ,1,61T1H, ■L,I,N,D, IAIVIEI ,T,O, IM,O,N,S,TIEIR 2 ' ,BID,F.G 104910 C U 2101010 I , 1 I I I I I I III III I I i 2 10 10 10 1 .210.010 Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, illum- H J L 100% ination, channelization, bridge, 44' roadway LID S, 17,T,H, 1RIAII,N,I,E1R, IT'D' ISIMIIiTIH,E,R,S1 , 2 A,B,D,F ,045,0 S U i ,2,0 I l i , I 12i010 1 I 1 1 I I I I I ,2i210 , 1121210 15. Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, illum- I Developer ination, channelization, 44' roadway. Partial work & LID _ from Rainier to Shattuck in 1982 16. CiO1N.T,R•OIL1L,E1 R, ,M,O,D,E,R,N,I,ZIAIT.I,OIN, a , 7 V/II i 1 . j 1 U J 14i0 1 1410 , .4,0 , 18,0 I , 1 i 1 , , 1 I ,210,0 L , 12,010 v Purchase of traffic signal controllers to replace cni obsolete equipment. r . w DISTRIBUTION 1 COPY DISTRICT STATE AID ENGINEER DOT 140-049 1 COPY C.R.A.B.(COUNTIE5 ONLY) Jan. 1990 • BALL • SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19 82 TO 19 8 7 Page 3 of 6 — OBLIGATION PROGRAM — „ „ Hearing pate July 20, 1981 • EXHIBITA /{doplion Date July 27 1981 City/County Jfeypunching Mote:Data entered in tole I-S-moot Resolution Number 2410 City-No. 1- 0-_7-1-0-L 0 be-en-an-cards-punched-from --- ---- County No. 1 7 7-8 this-form. ,o PRO.J.ECT CO5T5"1N THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS • • PROJECT IDENTIFICATION aY 1 OBLIGATION SCHEDULE .FUNDING SOURCE z Zit le,Route,Road Log No., Section No., o` Work •Total d ;.b ...Y.E.A_£.A FR E .Location/Termini,Deecription of Work, Y. Code Length \.o FEDERAL _. _TOTAL r Beginning Milepost # Bridge No. -a o {Miles) .� 't(A��oril 2 nd 3 rd 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL, FUN D'.J '-' C' Element) 41.G th AMOUNT PROGRAM 4 I. S- 4 5 8 7 8 S 10 . 11 ' la 13 - 14 _ 15 16 17•. .. _aim • !7 40 41 44 4s 4@ 47AS ' St 52..__ 53 i0 a e 5 e 04 ct it 91 at 15 7e fa es 17. C10,M,P,U,T,E,R, 1E1N,HIAIN,CIE,M,EIN,TI I I I 1 1 I 7(///,��I' , 1 , L I U 1212104 ,•, I • 1 1 I • , 1 1 , 11181_3•FIAIUIS•J 1317 ill 1 1 1212104 Add additional control capacity, replace obsolete - i/ti� equipment 18. s1w1 ,G,R,AID,Y, IL,I,N1D, 1T10, IL,01N,G,AiC,RIEIS, 2W.BIDIF,G , 17,0 S U 1 , i 1 15 1010 i , , , 1 i 1 i I I t I , t , i 1,5,010 i ,1151010 Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination, H J L • 100% channelization, P-1 Bridge, 56' roadway • LID • �� M,OINIS,T,E,RI 'RID'. IA,L,TIE,R,NIAtTIE, IAICiCtE,SIS 1�%B,D,F,G ,042,2 C U 1 , 1 ,2 ,5t2 ; 1 1 I I I 111310 FIAISIP i i 1 1112,2 1 1 121512 • Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, channelization H /I:'J >./;-1, L o (' -;.)4., ii/ 1, Lem, � �, �c�: I G,A,R,D,E,N, ,A,V,E, ,NI ,4,T,H, ,T,0, ,N, ,B�T,H1 , 21,BID4F.G ,0 ,2,5 S U , I I ,3,0,0 , , , , 1 I L , 1 _ 1 , 1 tit 13010 3 0 0 20. Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination, H J 75% channelization LID M,O,NIRIO,E, ,A,V,E, INIE,6,TIH1 ITIO, IN,E11,2,T,H1 2MB,D,F1G ,0+3,8 C U ill 1 1 , 1151810 I I I III Ili III 1151810 I I11518,0 21. Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination, H J 25% channelization, 44' roadway LID • V,A,L,L,E,Y, ,P,KIW,Y, ,G1RIA,D,Y, ,T,0, ,1,4,0,T,H1 lIFA1B,D,F ,1l0,0 M U i , i i 1 i , i , 5151010 , , , i i 1 , i 1 5,5,010 , ,5, 5,01 0 22. Grading, drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, gutter, GHIJ Developsr illumination, signal, bike route, channelization, L M 0 landscaping. bridge. 56' roadway . 23. NI ,l,S,T, 'Sin ,P,AIR,K, IT101 IBIU,R,NO'T,T, IAIV 3V<B,D,FiG ,042,0 A U I I I , I I , I I ,311'16 I I I I I i I I , ,31116 i 131116 . Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, channel H ' ization MIO,N,R,O,E, ,AIV, ,N1E, ,2,N,D, ,T,01 ,N,E, ,41T,H, 1[�//.B,D,F,G ,M,8 C U , , i 1 , , I , , ,61010 I I I 1 i , , , , ,6,0,0 , , 161010 24. Drainage, paying, curbs, sidewalk, H J O. g g gutters, illumin- ation, channelization, 44' roadway t^ 0o r DISTR!ThUTI ON I COPY DISTRICT STATE AID tmonsi£ER _ --DO•, 140-049 -- - - 1-COPY C,R.A.E.(COUN.TIE5 OMLY-- -- 1 _ _ ] l BALL 31-X YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19$� TO 1987 , Page 4 of 6 - _ - - -- - — OBLI-GAT_IO.N PROGRAM — __ Nsa. ng_ ate_ July 20. 1981 EXHIB „IT A _-City/CourtlySCe unchIn Notes-Dafe-tittered-in_Colo-1-Stnu5t ReeoJ• tin Date July 22. 1981 yp g- L?eeoJ_utiao Number 2410 City No. 1 0 710 3-.4 be en all cards punched from f, • County No. 1 7 7-8 this forn1. .. J a PR C05T5'1N THOUSANDS OF-DOLLARS - • PROJECT IDENTIFICATION oY r' 2 1 OBLIGATION:-SCHEDULE .FUNDING SOURCE 0 Title Route,Road !.o No. Section No. Tbtal d 7 h _. Y_E A F� z Location Termini Deacri lion of Work a.)'t Work length \;ost FEDERAL _ •FUNDL u Beginning Milepoet Q bridge No. a o Code (Miles) c § r(A,,nudl 2 nd 3 rd 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL FUNDS F, I.? a a Element) et 6 its AMOUNT PROGRAM _ . _ .i _Z • -S- 4 5 9 78 5 .10 . II 12v 13 14 15 16 17•. 1 AS 86 • s7 40 41 44 45 4@p744e ' F4 Si...- es w se Go is 04 •r1,4s 7t a TS 76 is to es 25. N,E,i1;2,T1Hi .EtD.M,O,N1-D,S, ,T,OI ,Kt It RI KtLI-AIN,D 2I%/,-B�Dt-F,G ,.0a3,-1 C U- 1 i t , .• 1 t • _. • i . 15t814, i 1 I • i I I_ e', 1 , • L51814• I 1 1518144 Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, illumin- H J 50% ation, channelization LID 26. L;IL N,D W1 1 ,A,V,E, ,S, 1161TiH, ,T,O, iSiWi !GIR,AIDIY 2Y//BiDiF,G 104210 S U tit tit , 1 , 1 ?_,4, 010 1 1 L . I 1 , 1 , _ 21410,0 112141610 Drainage, paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, illumina- HIJL Developer tion, signal, channelization, bike route, landscaping, M 0 FAI-405 Bridge. 44' roadway 27. StT1,NISIEIT. IA.T.1Vif1 1RIRIf),N,S,fhN, 'not ,I,4,015 21�� 0a B,D1F,G . 5.0 M U I I I 1 11 I . I I ,81410 1 I I 11 ill 161410 , 1 181410 Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, gutters, signal, H I J 20% illumination, channelization, widen to 68 feet . LID V,A,L,L,E,Y1 ,P,IC,W,Y, )Si WI411LS T T O ,S,W,116,T 1 /,A,BID,F ,147,0 M U I I I , II III 6101010 III , I 1 / , I 6101010 , '6101010 28. Grading, drainage, paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, GHIJ Developer illumination, signal, bike route, channelization, L M 0 landscaping, bridge VIA,Li LiEIY, -LP!K1W1Y, IS,W11161Till' ,T10, IGIRIAiDiY 1WAiB.DIG ,04110 M U I I I i 1 , , , I 5i 01 010 , i I I I I I I I 5101010 I 'Si%010 i �• Grading, drainage, paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, GHIJ 20% illumination, signal, bike route, channelization, L M 0 LID • 1 landscaping. bridge. 66' roadway L.K. ,W,A.SOH. .B.L.V.D1 1NI IPiKt 1T,01 ICII,TIYu IL 2rABi91F.G 1310,3 S U 1 1 , , 1 i I I 1 4181010 11 , i t i 1 I i 418.0.0 1 .4,81010 30. Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalks, gutter, illumin- H J 25% anon, channelization LID S1W, 1217,TIH, IV,AILILI IPIKIWIY, ,T101 1W, ,V.AiL1 ).f'//��A.B.D,F 10a513 S U , 1 i 11 1 1 1 1 2151010 1 i i 1 1 i 1 i 1 21510to 1 12151010 31. Grading, drainage, paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalks, GHIJ Developer illumination, signal, bike route, channelization, L M 0 landscaping, 44' roadway SiE, ,P1U,GIEITI ID.R. 1J10.NIE.S1 LT,OI_ .EIDIMIOIN,D 2I///.B,D1F,G ,047,8 S U i , i 1 I I tit 191610 I . I I I I 1 I I ,91610 t , ,9,610 . 32. Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, gutter, illumin- H J cA, ' ation, channelization, 44' roadway I1 co . DISTRIBUTION I-COPY_D-I$TRICT STATE AID E1410I1-46ER DOT 140-049 I-COP-Y-C,R.A.8.-(COUIILTIE5 ONLY - - -- - Jan. 1990 i . I51A ,-t SIX. YEAR TRAN8P0RTAT10N IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 192Z. TO 19 g7 Page 5 of 6 ' — 0-BLIGATION____P--RO-aRA-M July_20,_1981 - — • EXHIBIT "A" Hearing-Date Adoption Date July 27. 19 81 City/taunt _Keypunching-Note:-Data-entered-in-c-ole-l-8-muat Reeolution-Number 2410 ' City No. 1 0 71 o s-a. be an all cards punched from it • County No. 1 7 7-6 thin form. e x PR O-J.ECT.COSTS'IN THOUSANDS OF'DOLLARS • n °' a OBLIGATION:SCHEDULE• PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 0X � , FUNDING SOURCE 0 Title,Route,Road Log No., Section No., 2 o Work •Total .b __•_._Y.E A. CZ . E Location/Termini7Deecrtption of Work, ,.' Code •Length .2\;a FEDERAL .- .TOTAL ,u Beginning Milepoet 4 Dridge No. -d o (Miles) -2.� t(Aiinv�1 2 nd 3rd - 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL FUNDS 1-: O. tY Element) 4 Gill AMOUNT PROGRAM 4 E LS-- 4 5 676 • 9 • 10 . II IE 13 . - 14 15 16. 17• -9 ., 1!Se 41 4Q 44 45 40 47 48 • Si 62._-_ 55 70 ' 34 00 33 04 • •7 N . II 12 73 74 78 80 08 Sit/Jig StEITI IB1x.IIVIDi -.II4i0151 ITI0, IPIAlRtK1 IDIR-2KB,D�FIG ,0>191C S U - 1 .1• (-, ,• 1 i • . ,- I •1181010,-_1--1 i I I ..1 I -1-.118101Q 1 L1181010, 33. Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, gutters, channel- H J ization and illumination ���/�, 34. B,EINIS,0,NI ,R,D, IG1RIAIDIYI ITI0, LSIEI 13111S,T1 2V) B,DIF,G ,118,0 S U 11 1 , , 1 1 , i 214,010 III 11 , I I 1 214,0,0 1 12,4,0,0 • Drainage, paving, gutters, curbs, sidewalks, illum- 10% ination, channelization (dependent on SR 515 Phase 2) LID 35 TIAlYILIOIRa 1N,W, iR,E,N,T10,N, ,T,0, ,SI T,E,V,E,NI S 2 , B,D,F,G ,OL6,0 C U I I I I I I 1 1 1 1712,0 1 I I I I I , 1 , 171210 1 i 17i210_ . Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ilium- H J 25% ination, channelization LID N,E, ,1, 2,T,H, 1LY, ,NIN,W,0101D, ,T,01 ,U,NII101N, , 2MBIDIF,G ,016, 0 C U I i I I , , I I 1 1,01010 1 1 I i i , 1 , 1 110,0L0 , ,1, 0,010 36. Drainage, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, illum- H J 50% ination, channelization LID U,N,I101N, ,A,V, ,N,E, 1S,U,NIS,E,T, ,T10, ,N,E,2,41T 2MB,D,F,G ,047,0S U tit III III ,610,0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i ,610,0 1 1 16,0,0 37' Drainage, paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, channel- H 50% ization �� LID • E,D,M,O,NID,SI ,A,V,E, ,EIXITIEINIS,I,0 N 1 1MAIB,D,F ill U I I 1 I , I III III lit III III AI , 38. Connection from NE 3rd to Maple Valley Highway. G H I L Alignment not determined at this time. ����K • I I „ , I I I , I I I I I I , I I I , I 1 , 1 I 1 R , I , , • , III III III 1 1 'I lit lit III III 11 1 1 1 Kill- III III III III III III III oil III 1 1 I 1 1 ._ n DISTRIBUTION 1 GOPYDISTRICT STATE AIO ENAIMLER_ - DOT I40-049 - - -- - --- -- Jnn.-13tit3 I COPY CR.A.E.-(COUNTIC3_ON1.Y) 3A1-t 3T-X. YEAR.TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19 82 TO 19 87 Page 6 of 6 -- _ - - _ — O-BLI -AT-iO-�---IPROdRAM`  -- EXHIBIT "A" - - Heering Date- July 20. 1981 ADDENDUM #1 - STATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS Adoption Date July 27. 1981 CHHy/County _Xeypunching- Tote---Data-entered-in-cols-I--8-must eeo ufla`If is 1410 Gay No. 1 0 710 s-a be on all cards punched from 1 County No. 1 7 7-8 this form. 81 R PRcvaecr.CO5TB•1N THOUSANDS OF'DOLLARS • ., �' c OBLIGATION"SCHEDULE o PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ex FUNDING SOURCE z Ttt le,Route,Road Log No., Section No., a Total d -a b _ Y E A R �o Work. FEDERAL _ .TOTAL Location/Termini,Deacrlption of Work, 03length &\;o n Beginning Milepoai Bridge No. tl(0. Code {Miles) c.g t/ .-_-1 2 • nd 3 rd 4,5 U.A.B. LOCAL FUNDS ►� • _ II'c., C3 Element) et 6 th AMOUNT PROGRAM i -Z 6. =33 4 5 8 7 8 3 .10 . II 12 13 14 15 16. 17' _Jrapdr 44 4s 4@f17 48 ' 6I 52--'-._ 5510 ' 69 CO e6 et • vie . . Ta le 76 71, 1969 es S,R. 15.1151 (S. IP,UIG,ElTI rDIRI IT,OI ISl ICIIITIX lf%/,FIGIHII ,110,6 M U J I- 1 , 1- , I ► . , I . 1 . I . 11. I . 1 1 I .'1 i 1 ♦ 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 State DOT Project - construct new roadway. J City participation: sidewalk, curbs, signalization, illumination, channelization _ F,A,I, ,4,0,5, ,N, .CiliT,Y, .T,O, ,S, IC,I,TIY, I I 2 y// 1 1 , 1614,4 M U 1 1 I 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 III III III III I I I I I State DOT Project - capacity improvements r�� • SIR! 11.6,9. 10.U,EIE INI ,SIEI ,TIO1 1114191 TIH! ISIE 1Y// 1 I , .1a414 M U III . I I . 1 1 I I I III I I I ill III IIIII State Project - construct five lane roadway y//� S,R1 '9,0,0. ,R1EIN,T101N, IT10, 121S,S,A,4,U1A,H, , 2P/l 1 1 . 1,10,0 M U r I , I , I , 1 1 tit lit I , , , , I I , , 1 , , 1 1 , State Project - widen to four lanes with five lanes ' at intersections SIR, .511.5, IS,7,T,H, IT101 ,A,I,R,P,OIR,TI IWIA.Y1 1 M BJD,F,G 0347,0 M U III 11 . , I I II . III III I I I 1 1 1 IIIII Drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination, HIJL signal, channelization, bridge, 56' roadway . ' milt 1 / 1_1 . 1 4 . I I I ill 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 III III III III IIIII I „ I , I I I , , I , I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I , 1 1 L . . , I a I III III III 1 1 I Ill I I I III III 11 1 1 1 l I , I 1 , I I I 1 . I Mitt . 4 1 1 1 1 III III III 111 III III ill I I I I I 1 11315TRIBUTI ON I COPY DISTRICT STATE AID ENGINEER DOT 14o-049 1 COPY C,R.A.D.(COUNTIES 0111LY) Jan,.—I990 • • i / , ii Mw,...dar 1 i /02 72 st qAs 74 X FtiNA - CAPindu... 0 LimAly. PAGE 8'8 , ! PRoTecr L./Sr/A/0 ' -77--- ---- _ _ .7.—___. (I? _------____71-F-_. _ , . • TOTAL ' 5/2/b4E icAsP 0 il . --. Alqii Reoret r i 4,AeofiglA,7oN F4vs ROL. or 74, 7449 OAS 74 .- . --- r—• , • • : 211o/2, earegte4F.72.pl. ,7)14.1seg 37Soo; ,' , 3,11 /.17 NE Sunsef•sig.tals, Conor. . .32100. 2895y 0 32/co! 4 if2, g/A'Xing Ilarkiiigs!Audit. .4546_ 0 rady Bridge __IPS 4'E .73 308. . .. _ ' /7080. ,..!, (41.50.SEE 3oi FuNb) 1 . . . . 40et NE 41C/niao 9 Ave. Audit 700.. 1 1 i . . 7o0i •,1 Ara 41 i - 8 p68 Tial bal. les;1.S. consrrr , //6 922. : .. . . . 1/6 922i . 9[072 nionrbe Ave.NE r.onst-r. /00000, 1 • l00006, 11 '0 /144 Valley e41.1.4714Y__Av1ih Soo ! Sop' 1 5/1/ . sly 27#* Slimly I Audit .. Soo ; Soo' . i 2177 Pugel•br S Alemsorii. Lonsrr 210 Ooc:i II7it 0 ad, . 36000! , i ! • , . • , -- 3.1, 4:1/2 3 Hayes PI.NW OPer/ay 2oo V . ' • 2000 ,./z44 .1iczniii Ave NW , A ylgoo . y Boo . 1/25 Me/son P/. Nw 1 2250 . ; . . 2 2 SO .1/12: NW 3rd.Sfr /2 oo • • , . . , ..V27 NW 3rd.l'/, , , 25"So : . . . 9 'I/2 ' NW174%. SY-.• 3 3o o • • t • . . . . 3 306, 0 i/29 Map& A ve,AM/ .' 6000 . 6 pod T- ., i/30 NW 2h . ./aoo , /Boo, d Pl . . . . .293/ NIV 2Au/SI: /Boo , . . .1 Boo'. • .3.132. Lind Ave. NW 1 67go : . , . . . . 675p. .-1.:133 SI-everur Ave.Niv i0500 : . . . . . . . 10500 Ni4, 5,44 AY. 1 i Soo /5°6 -*evens CourfrNki ., . /goo i . . . . I Soo, , .7 V3 MVO% P/. j, . 3 7 5*o 1 . . . . . . . . 37 So. --Iii/371 Seneca Ave NW / . 9750 ; . . . , /.38 nitylor,4ve NW goo : . . . . ?pp. ,„,a 7,44, sfr .. . - 33 op . .170oo. 1 . . . ‘. Boo.° . . . i diliVil NW 5,4 Si7 /COO . . . /506. il 1 Seneca Ave.NW 2 5165o . . . . . . . S 650. 4!'/4'31 NAV 3rd.S1-. 24400. . . . 24coo. ____alefaCi li 1 .r4451 Noi CHIP/. i 27S0 . . . 2750 : --- ,i4a Houser Way N Overlay 29000 , 29 000 ,_ .,_ 65Yerhxy Subiblal:10917So) . ^ • .. •,, PA sop, 0 qe ---, sehooe _ .._ . . i -7-0i74L EV..7 . RCA-. twev,LA o 4A -74 X 1 , . 28 ego 0 ' 631 780 /V 000 175480 2700 0 4oEb7o • • 1 . --- _... . 411-. „E'rbetiale Fond Baiarice . r. _._ -,0- /952 B411)0Er 9 M.. Inge 3W M 3o/ FORWARD T1�R(/J7 F na - CAP/TAL ou'rLA> PAGE 89 • ' PA•oTEcT L/ST/wG — �__— - __ (11 _ (2) (3) (4) (5) , I Aeo(i , ToTAG B�Q/D yE (/T/t/7y FwD. all, PROTECT fIPP�Ga4C/ATiaN UAB RE-Pi.. O TNRv.S`r 1 dr . PseE . :I 2 arder, Ave N. consfr. 9,5-/251 . . . . /5/25 311 (A/so set L/. ) . . I .. . . 'II I PS;'Es . Io2B Z. /214•.1't C.o•,sir. /96 5oo /9•6 Soo ' lo'2q Logan Ave.N. dead,. S000d . . . I S0000 . i9� . 101 I 11!101 0.AVe//s Ave.Bridge Co sh-. 600001oj . . ,yca0000! /20 000 I 11 . W $6 rad Way Bridge C sn.r r ,B22 00o .65 0.00� . /bc000 y N 9 i . 7 .51 I 61/so see /o2 Fund) 1 16 j • 1(70/P4 project Altikk4/a) . . i . . . . . ' I 'al/// 15W 413rd sr Conrf r. /,26/,Soo; ✓/2op.00l_ . - ; . 6/Soo:® 6975o; . 9I (�Tointprof�ct�Kenh� • /Q 250:® II(Also see Lb) 323), 11 I 11 . . ppSE'E I z= //3 572 S/SP�,arell Constr. rf25000. . . . I 4 ZS000 ,3I , '+. . . . • . . • i ' I s1 6i I • I Dry jPMoPRn4r#eA/ (JAB R5PL. 1 . '_- 3,445o,/25.. 4/2o,0oo ;/37,000 6/Soo© /,/2/,37.5' /o 25o 0 , .7 .3! Endmn9 Friyc . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . -- .4I Balance . ,si /6�C9 r/75 I r,� /q82 Buoc�e-r . 9 6,ogq,600 ._ . . . . . . • . •J,: I 1.I I . . 'Es*.Er+drn9Furid-Ba/. ,64,c75,-- -"- - Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COU TY OF KING ss. _ __ 1 - c RENTON I .b a -NOTICE J Audr.e ...De J �oie being first duly sworn on n„ PUBLIC RENTON COUNCIL oath,deposes and says that.she.is the ...c.hie.f...c.1.erk. of p'1 OTICE HEREBY GI- THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a VEND Renton City week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been Council ( 23rd for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, "daycWAugusf,198 plg:;bar?: printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper $a]t(xb Council Champublished four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is ers oft Renton Munici now and'during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the -Building, o a ED Avene aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record "South,Renton,Washingto Chronicle hasl been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior as the EStI am fa , Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 2Jpublichearinglbconsid the following: 1983'89• Capital Im=' I Washington.That the annexed is a.Nati e•e•••of•••I ie•e ti•g 1:•l5rovement Program.Re- quests(Im[gyp Depart- ent,Library„G an. R8155 p. _ Recreation De artment, Policy Development De= as it was published in regular issues(and pat lent, Public Works,'' not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period i De-,,�P, tment,, ay'' �s(S ewer) Droision, Utility (Watgr)`Dwision and Airport::, of I 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the y, l�interestedper 11 f,invited lb pre b t hsent to voice approval• , dis=(, .. .day f August ,19...82.,and endingthe ' " � , same,91 AI opinions ions on' ,ie i- i. ,, -,, ,,- • LA r' 1 `,"` * v' 'City • Renton ... y,iday of -� ,19... both dates r r); Maxine' Moter in 4 e, and that such net P as regularly distributed to its sub- scribers'during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ~+t:Published lathe DailyR • Chronicle-August'`( ; R8155. o charged for he foregoing publication is the sum of $ .. which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundr for the first insertior•and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent • - insertion'. - I • 1 Chief...Clerk i Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th day of I, ; Aui 'u t _ , 19'82 .__ 1 . . „_.42 ,-- _ I: : Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at K5ek King County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. i —Western nion Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted b the newspapers of the State. I VN#87 Revised 5/82 I Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. allRENTON J PUB NLICOTICE CN Audrey..DeJ ie being first duly sworn on $3 R NTON l COUNCIL NOTICE E HEREBY Q EN GU gin Renton Cii17 oath,deposes and says that alas.is the ...ell3Gf...elerk of Council 1 23rd THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a •ay62August,1982,E(38:00 week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been r'Tm.fill ,Mil Council Charnb-- for morel than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, d�(i-5 Renton Municipal printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper '.` I•`9 i'All Din Avenue published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is 1South,Renton,Washington, now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the kas'Rollo kaii•'1 for p' aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record public f"�xA t consider Chronicle haslbeen approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior the following:.- Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 1983 89 Capital Im- improvement- .. . Re •uests -Depart- Washington.That the annexed is a.Nonage.f- e'8tin Milt Library, at and, I Recreation Department, • s Policy Development De-'• 118155 ; partent 'Public Works � ,D; pa�rtment Milli ty as it was published in regular issues(and (Sewer) Division, Utility not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period tt`(�Wate) Division and r Airport. I `Any and ED interested per- kliP3 • 47L7pre- of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the ,sent; ;,5:2,approval, dis approval.: opinions' on. same ix ;)1 , ' ...6 th..'day f 41,1P118:b 19...82.,and ending the a ,l "i cz, � �►rf�Reriton (u E Motor.t s Acting City4lerk', 4„�•P-ublished(al the Daily Re- day of ,19...{.�. both dates LJ Chronicle August 6, in e, and that such ne t� as regularly distribdtl to its sub- 198.2:G IPPI, scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee I charged ifor -he foregoing publication is the sum of $... which has been!paid.in full at the rate of per folio of one hundr2c xl,o 4 for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion'. d -.0 ,3fzI‘,);:• • • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16 ill day of f3u(,ust ,- 9.82n.. e I • - I -•Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kent King County. i A7 U —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. 1 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted br the newspapers of the State. 1 I VN#87 Revised 5/82 Renton City Council 2/22/82 Page 5 Old Busin-ss - Continued - Utilities Committee - Continued Solid Waste the Current Fund/Garbage Account. Referral to Ways and Mears Management Plan Committee requested for drafting ordinance. The report also recom- Contin'ued mended the Public Works Department submit a proposal to the Utilities Committee for improvements to the Renton Transfer Station, funding from Referendum 39, Capital Improvement monies - Puget Sound Coun- cil of Government (PSCOG) . MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECOND STREDICKE, CON- CUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Deak LJCAG Utilities Committee report recommended Council concur with ,he Public Works Department to approve granting of the Dr. Deak Late- ' comer's: Agreement in the amount of $19,340 for a period of ten years. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to sign agreement. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility Portion The committee report noted review of the Six Year Capital Improve- 6-YeariCaOtal ment Program - Utilities and recommended the Public Works Dept. Improvement Pgm. prepare a list of the prioritized projects and their current status. Information only, no action required. Councilman Reed examined the committee report attachment: Proposed Public Works Projects in Prioritized Order and questioned ;lighting replacement of 155 luminaires (5 year program) , asking re d corative lighting in CBD. Houghton explained 155 luminaires are replacement in downtown, but not decorative street lighting but the high sodium Vapor lights. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented ordinance for i CommititeeI second and final readings (first reading 2/8/82) which amended (Ordinance #3611 the fee schedules of Title IV. Building Regulations and Title IX Number Re erved) Public Ways and Property of the City Code, by adding annexation filing fees and lot line. adjustment fees. Annexation filing fee: Ordinance #3612 $200 for 10% petition and $300 for 75% petition (Resolution 2429) . Filing� Feip Following reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL Annexatiohs and ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Councilman Stredicke questioned same fee for Lot Line single lot annexation as numerous parcel annexation; Rockhill noted Adjustments intent to encourage large annexations. Upon inquiry, Policy Develop- , ment Director Clemens noted the filing fee covers basic city costs for processing annexation. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED, MATHEWS; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. First Rea ing The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading for an ordi- nance providing for appropriation and transfer of $36,188.87 from Cumulative Reserve Fund 3278 Unemployment Compensation to Unemploy- ment Compensation Fund #608. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. First Reading The committee recommended first reading of an ordinance authorizing acquisition of property by condemnation in Superior Court for the construction/installation of sanitary sewers, water mains, curbs , etc. in the vicinity of East Valley Hwy and SW 16th St. , LAID #314. Following reading, MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL REFER ORDI- NANCE BACK TO THE COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. • Ordinance #3613 Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented an ordinance Gene Coulpn for first reading . suspension of rules advance to second and Memorial leach final readings and adoption. The ordinance provides foriissuance; Park Bonds specifies maturities and terms of $1 ,825,000 General =Obligation Park Bonds 1982, authorized by voters at a special election, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3336, amended by Ordinance 3350., Following first reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND; HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND.AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. City Clerk Mead read ordinance. • MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. I Renton ity Council 2/22/82 Page 6 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued - Ways and Means Committee - Continued Resolution #2437 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Propose Alley setting the date of 5, April 1982 for public hearing1on proposed Vacatio VAC 3-82 vacation of alley located between Burnett Ave, N and Park Ave. N Kennydale and N 32nd St. and N 33rd St. ; petition filed by Davidson; VAC 3-82. Following reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers#38132 through #38404 in the amount of $982,967.72 having received depart- mental certification as to receipt of merchandise/service . Approval includes LID #314 Revenue Warrant R-11 $13,725.80; LID #317 Revenu- Warrant R-7 $23,051 .61 and LID #320 Revenue Warrant No. Ril $1 ,340. (Machine Voids: #38127 - #38131 ) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY CLYMER, APPROVE VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. The committee report recommended withdrawal of request of Personnel Director for amendinglegislation for Finance Director poition, 9 noting present ordinance reflects desired amendment. Stredicke inquired as to date ordinances first codified and process of up- dating to maintain current status. City Clerk Mead explained the Master Code Book is available for departments to check their books , that ordinances first codified in 1957, recodification underway, scheduled for 1982 completion; new Code Books to be issued. , NEW BUSINESS Councilman Clymer called attention to Public Hearing 2/25/82 Special Special Meeting Meeting re land use regulations for adult motion pictures, 7:30 p.m. . Executive Session Council Chambers. Clymer requested an Executive Session be held following regular meeting to discuss pending litigation. Garbag- Contract Councilman Stredicke noted new garbage contract limits the number Increa es limited of times collection fees can be increased to once per year and to Onc per Year estimated higher costs claiming King County raises dump fees with- out prior notice and often mid-year. Stredicke urged option for contract to allow increase. Finance•and Public Works comments invited. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch commended Clark Peterson, noting presentation of REPORT certificate of merit from the Vocational Technical Institute for his service to students. Mayor Shinpoch spoke to 60 first grade students about the City functions such as clean water, police, parks , etc. i The Mayor dis- tributed drawings from the class , noting her enjoyment of the ques- tions asked, such as "Do you know where Lola, montana is?" Mayor Shinpoch noted Councilwoman Mathews and City. Clerk Mead would be addressing Kennydale School girls in Mayor's absence. Nation- 1 Cities Mayor Shinpoch announced she would be leaving Thursday toIattend Confer-nce the National Cities Conference in Washington, D.C. Council Presi- dent Clymer also attending following Council 's Public Hearing 2/25. HB 101 , Opposed Councilman Stredicke presented letter to state government officials requesting denial of support of HB 1014 and cork for passage of sales tax increase without the requirement to prohibit system j development fees and limit utility taxes. The letter explained fairness of systems development .fees. MOVED BY STREDICKE, .SECOND REED, LETTER BECOME OFFICIAL COUNCIL STAND AND AUTHORIZE SENDING . CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. CARRIED. 10:45 P.M. Council reconvened in regular session. All Council Members were present at Roll Call . l MOVED BY ADJOURINMENT CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 11 :i00 P.M. I (Z.:I' --U-e . //".<- 1 Delores A. Mead, C.M. City Clerk 1 I 1 VIP , Rentonl City Council 2/22/82 rage 4 OLD BUSINESS Committee of Whole Council ' President Clymer presented Committee of the WholelReport StreetIVacation requesting that the citizens of Rolling Hills obtain a MAI appraisal SE 18th S't. of that portion of SE 18th Street as requested for vacation VAC 5-81 . VAC 5-81 The report stated the matter is tabled until the appraisal is pre- sented to the Council . (Matter referred 12/14/81 ) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Disposition The Committee report recommended acceptance of the plan for use of Old Shop Site the old shop site property as a pea-patch as outlined by the Housing and Community Development Coord ni ator, Ed Hayduk. MOVED BY CLYMER, ! SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ! City Shop The committee report recommended the Administration request the Projec1t R view Finance Department closely monitor the bond market for favorable 1 conditions for selling the councilmanic bonds. Information. Planning , nd Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented Development committee report noting consideration of request of CHG International Commitheel to amend the P.U.D. Ordinance to provide for temporary or ' final P.U.D.,1Orl1inance, occupancy permits prior to completion of the entire P.U.D. plat. Condition 1 The report recommended Council concur in the recommendation of the Use Permit Policy Development Director (letter to Committee 2/18/82) and refer the matter to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 1 COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Fence Height The committee report noted review on 2/11/82 of Council referral of Variances 6/1/81 re the subject of variance of fence heights. The committee recommended Council acceptance of the recommendation of the Building and Zoning Department report 2/11/81 . N0' leaislative action required. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, COUNCIL ACCEPT, RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ! . . StreeU Stredicke inquired re holes in street, noting earlier claimsl for Improvem=nt damages. Public Works Director Houghton noted the streets now repaired. Stredicke inquired of schedule for street resurfacing and was advised the 6-Year Street Improvement Program would soon be considered. Metro Bus . Councilman Reed asked the delay be investigated for replace Tent of Passenge shelter for Metro bus passengers at new location of Mill Ave. S, Shelter noting 60• day delay. Houghton acknowledged request. , Reed also requested upgrading of parking lot markings forihandicapped spaces,. noting deterioration of paint. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews submitted committee report Comm— it ee[ regarding request from West Hill Water Districts to purchase water. West Hill Water The report noted meeting with Public Works Dept. and recommended • the City cooperate with the districts in developing a joint use water system improvement plan to best serve all interested water districts and the City West Hill area. MOVED BY MATHEWS, 'SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilman Clymer called attention to plan several years ago to build water tank in the West Hill area, however Water Districts withdrew and funding was lost. Public Works Director .Houghton explained proposed construc- tion working with comprehensive plan for joint facility, noting tanks in Highlands and Rolling Hills. Houghton also noted funding may still be available. MOTION CARRIED. 1 it 1 Solid Waste Utilities Committee report noted consideration of. solid waste manage- Management Plan ment plan to bring King County into compliance with state ard federal requirements. The report recommended Council authorize participa- tion in the program at a cost not to exceed $2,396.00 to be paid from zRentoi I ty Counc' 7/27/81 Page 3 ' Ordin races and Resolutions - Continued Zoning Inquiries Councilman Shane inquired regarding zoning of annexed la d, being of the opinion that all property should be annexed as R-l . Acting Planning Director Clemens called attention to City ordinance establishing G-1 zone for all annexed property with subsequent rezoning. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record that Council sets policy; General classification provided by State law; Council has not chosen to deal with zoning of property. Resolution #2410 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of Six-Yoar the following resolutions: Transportation Impro ement Resolution was read adopting the City's Six-Year Transportation Program Improvement Program and Arterial Street. Plan; public hearing 1982- 987 was held 7/20/81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE. RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2411 A resolution was read giving Council approval of a final plat Hilli Homes for the subdivision of property located at the east side of Final Plat Edmonds Ave. NE at NE 23rd P1 . ; known as the Hillis Homes Co. FP-0 1-81 Weatheredwood II . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2412 A resolution was read authorizing transfer of $7,525.56 from Fund Transfer ADAP Project Fencing Acct. to Equipment Rental Account, flor the All-Weather Mower purchase of an all-weather Mower. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Stredicke recalled Aviation Committee had recommended retention for Airport. CARRIED. First Reading Ordinance re An ordinance was read appropriating funds in amount of $197,522 Pa'jrke - Property for acquisition of Parker property, Cedar River Trail ., MOVED Acqui . ition BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. VOU' CARRIED. CH RS FOR Ways and Means Committee recommended, approval for payment of PAYME T Vouchers No. 34871 through No. 35092 in the amount of $929,290.65 having received departmental certification as to receilp of services/merchandise. Vouchers #34861 through #34870 machine voided. Approval includes LID #322 Revenue Warrant No.R-5 in amount of $1 ,032.01 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, APPROVE VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. Parker iProperty Upon request, City Attorney Warren explained acquisition of the Acqui tion Parker property, 24 acres located on Cedar River Trail , that Cedar River the City went to Court for condemnation and suffered defeat, Weida ds that Council authorized the City Attorney to negotiate acquisition; $225,000. Warren noted the property owner is making gift to the City of additional 25 acres located adjacent to Cedar 'River; also verbal commitment that property under power lines could be used for park purposes. Warren noted acquisition made of al trail property to City limits. Parks and Recreation Director Webley explained the Park Board is still determining development plans, that property will be natural low-maintenance, bike/pedestrian out to Jordan LaRue property, then pedestrian only due to terrain. Mayor Shinpoch commended the forsight to obtain the trail property for the citizens. NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke asked the matter of First Cities First Cities Equities Rezone #R-057-80 be taken from the table following Equities Rezone Thursday Committee of the Whole meeting concerning drainage in Green River Valley. Telephone Taxes MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, THE MATTER OF TELEPHONE TAXES, HOUSE BILL #61 , BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Clean Up Councilman Stredicke reported contact with King County Executive Costs Dunlap re reduction of County dump fees for HSCD clean1up; being encouraged to continue project but advised no reductionlin-fees policy. Ren Qn City Council 7/2 /81 Page 4 ADM NISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported Renton Host City for girls Little REPSRT League Baseball State Tournament; Renton team is one of eight participating. Mayor Shinpoch commended volunteers and contributors. ADJ0r RNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 8:4: p.m. Delores A. Mead, C.E1.C. City Clerk 3 ' EKPIII 35 CITY OF RENTON DATE 7/27/81 WARRANT DISTRIBUTION I • FUND TOTAL WARRANTS m MACHINE VOIDS: #34861 - #34870 �• CURRENT •164,l611.50 14 PARKS 029,426.37 1e ARTERIAL STREETS •15,5111.00 !• STREETS 1155,I821485 LIBRARY •2,036.81 . I n FEDERAL SHARED REVENUE 0214,597.00 STREET FORWARD THRUST 111422.94 0 COULON BCH PK CONSTR •246,575.29 A WATERWORKS UTILITY •129,635.51 AIRPORT 02.504.27 A 1975 W 6 S CONSTRUCTION •5,160•44 EQUIPMENT RENTAL •44g318.80 w FIREMEN'S PENSION 015,725.66 LID CONTROL 01,032.01 a TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS 0929,290.65 17 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OFITHE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT! MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY a APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 34871 THROUGH NO' 35092 IN THE AMOUNT so i OF I •929,290.65 T I 27TH Y OF JULY 1981e ss j COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN MEMBER 0 ni ON ,• i L.I.D. #322, REVENUE WARRANT No. #R-5 32.01 MEMBER • • ■ 7 � I M I 1 l Ren,,p City Council 9/ 4/81 Page 4 Old Businesk - Continued - Committee of the Whole - Continued Six-Year Capital CLYMER, ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF LIGHTING BE DESIGNATED ITEM #ARRIED. Improvement AND ITEM FOR ADDITION TO LIBRARY BE DESIGNATED AS ITEM #7. Program Council President Stredicke listed priority of items for the Continued Six Year Capital Improvement Program: #l . Maintenance Shop Facility in Renton Highlands; #2. Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Develop- ment; #3. Cedar River Trail Acquisition; #4. Heather Downs Park Property Acquisition; #5. Kennydale Fire Station; #6. Lighting Replacement; #7. Library Addition; #8. Fire Training Facility; . NewASo System. CARRIED.BY ORIGINAL MOTIONCKE, SECOND KHILL, MOTION CARRIED.* Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. CARRIED. 9:08 P.M. -Council reconvened at 9:29 P.M. Real Estate Purchase `ROLL CALL: All Councilman present. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke inquired reespinse toscr itizen Water Pressure questions re water mains and water pressure Hills Questioned and Victoria Park areas. Mayor Shinpoch noted matter under investigation. . Aviation Committee Aviation Committee report re ADAP Project 5-53-0055-03 Overrun Chairman: explained final billing submitted on this project which included Stredicke $20,597.38 for FAA's portion of the overrun which has not been paid to the. Airport because there was no ADAP legislation allowing ADAP Project bel e asked original ggna to be amended. The amendment for thatrt amounted andhe FAArty requires asked to signgrantClerk to a resolution be passed authorizing the Mayor rand dlCityd lerk sign. The committee recommended Council app SECOND referral to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, BY TRIMM, APPROVE THE REPORT. CARRIED. Fanche'r Flyways The Aviation Committee report noted_ meeting with Mrs. Wirz of Leases Fancher Flyways and the matter of compulsory garbage service was satisfactorily agreed. The committee recommended the leases be reinstated and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the lease documents. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT THE AVIATION COMMITTEE REPORT AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE LEASE DOCUMENTS OF FANCHER FLYWAYS. CARRIED. Aerodyne Leases Aviation Committee Chairman Stredicke noted ngotiate nswi Aerodyne th Aerodyne on three leases, that upon Attorney's has been advised to deal directly with leasing party,The Boeing Company; and that Boeing Rep. Bob Morgan keeping City advised. Transportation The Transportation Committee report recommended concurrence with Committe;e Public Works Dept, for acceptance of completed Railroad Gradefinal Final e Payment Crossing Markings Project #RRS-OOS and approve The report also recommended Swans,ton and final payment of $10,752.07. Equipment Co. release of retainage of $1 ,194.68 subject to required clearances. (See Consent Agenda Page 2.) MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED._ Planning & Planning and Development Committee report was presentediby Chairman Development Rockhill adding clarification to original committee .report of Committee 8/24/81 regarding appeal of One Valley Place Properties for Pre- One Valley Place liminary Planned Unit Development thattnoPeDrror2ofl and fact andDlaw4-81 . were Appeal PPUD 032-81 The committee reportHearin Council and PPU 044-81 foundwe r, then clarificationser's shouldchavenbeenon to made toe assist the however, Report Amended Hearing Examiner: (1) Accessory Uses: Section 4-710(2) AccessorY Uses usually incidental to allowed uses in P-1 Zone are clearly delineated; if non-permitted use proposed as primary use, then Conditional Use Permit request can be processed with Final PUD. (2) Height: Applicant's proposal to construct six storylbuilding exemplifies problem with ordinance only Council can address through police as ordinance has incompatible sections, such as 0702(L) and (M) allowing flexibility; however Section 4-2709(1)BI1limits requirements. The committee report recommended Council determine • the terms "lot size and setbacks" also address the general bulk dimensional requirements of the proposed structures, thus giving Examiner more review flexibility. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, ACCEPT AMENDED REPORT. CARRIED. 11 Renton City Council 9/14/8 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Damagel Claim Claim for Damages was filed by J & L Construction Co. , 11433 SE J & L ',instruction 86th St. , alleging damage to waterlines in amount of $3,074.82 at the Central Highlands Plaza. Refer to City Attorney and the Insurance Carrier.. Damage Claim Claim for Damages was filed by John E. Douchette, 856 S. Central , J. E. - Doucette Kent, in amount of $65.88 for tire damage alleging cement sections of divider island out of place. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Damage Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Richard W. Roscow, 11454 Marine R. W. "oscow View Dr. , Seattle, in the amount of $6,827.52 for 'damage to auto which ran off the end of Valley Parkway SW alleging City failed to sign Valley Parkway. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Appoinmment Mayor Shinpoch appointed John R. Tomkins as Police Officer Police Officer effective 10/4/81 subject to the new probationary ;period'' require- ment of one year. Tomkins certified by Civil Service to fill the vacant Renton Police Officer position. Council concur. Board of Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Kenneth Swanigan to Position #6 of Adjust�jent the Board of Adjustment for four year term effective to 9/6/85. Appoinoment Other Board Members: Position #1 Felix Campanella; #2 David M. Young; #3 Francis A. Holman; #4 James Dalpay; #5 Gerald Holman; #7 Barbara Lally. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consen' Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ACCEPT CONSENT AGENDA AS Approv= l PRESENTED. CARRIED, CORRESONDENCE Letter from Dean W. Bitney, Owner of Leisure Estates, 201 Union Leisurl� Estates Ave. SE, described attempted purchase and rezone of 30 acre Mobile Home Park parcel of property lying south of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park, re east of new King County shops property, east of Union Ave. SE Properly and north of Maplewood Golf Course. The letter explained $3,000 AcquiTion per month hold cost since option agreement 2/81 and advice that and Rerone rezone 'request would not be acted upon until the Comprehensive Plan for. the Northeast Quadrant has been completed, that the date has slid and will probably not be finalized prior to option expira- tion. The letter noted problems of meeting the Mobile Home Park Ordinance requiring a rezone to multiple designation prior to T mobile home designation; there being no.T Comprehensive Plan desig- nation and noted rezoning area to multiple is upsetting to area residents. Bitney suggested revision to the City ' Code 4-714 T Trailer Parks and requested permission to present rezone request directly to Council as done previously on adjacent ten acres. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REFER COMMUNICATION TO COUNCIL'S PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. OLD B 1. I NESS Commi .itee of Council President Stredicke presented Committee of the Whole the W Ole report concerning Policy for Development in the Green River Valley Devel •'•ment Policy Drainage Basin Area. The committee recommended referral of letter Green Fiver Valley from the Federal Emergency Management Agency dated 8/20/81 and Drain-'.e Basin the Mayor's recommendations to the Council dated 9/4/81 , to the Planning and Development Committee for consideration. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Stredicke noted letter re flood insurance recommended Council disallow fill in certain areas pending further study and the matter sent to committee without recommendation. Six-Y-=r Capital The Committee of the Whole presented the Mayor's recommended Impro -ment priorities for the Six-Year Capital Improvements Program without Progr. recommendation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.* MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, AMEND MOTION, MOVE ITEM #5 (Cedar River Trail Acquisition, Thomas Property) TO ITEM #3; MOVED ITEM #9 (Heather Downs Acquisi- tion) TO ITEM #4. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, MOVE ITEM #8 (Construct Fire Station #14 in Kennydale and Relocate Sta. #12 in Highlands) TO ITEM #5. CARRIED. MOVED HUGHES, SECOND BY _ e ,t7N ,_)--) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT September 14, 1981 POLICY FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GREEN RIVER VALLEY DRAINAGE BASIN AREA The Committee of the Whole recommends that the letter from the Federal Emergency Management Agency dated August 20, 1981 , and the Mayor's recommendations to Council dated September 4, 1981 , be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for con- sideration. SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The Committee of the Whole presents the Mayor's recommended priorities or the Six-year Capital Improvements Program without recommendation. L./.. - Age.' /v* itic• . M. Stredicke Council President I 1 wr 4 . _, Renton City Council 9/14/81 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by J & L Construction Co. , 11433 SE J & L Construction 86th St. , alleging damage to waterlines in amount of $3,074.82 at the Central Highlands Plaza. Refer to City Attorney and the Insurance Carrier.. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by John E. Douchette, 856 S. Central , J. E. .D•ucette. Kent, in amount of $65.88 for tire damage alleging cement sections of divider island out of place. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. 1 Damages Claim Claim, for Damages was filed by Richard W. Roscow, 11454 ;Marine R. W. Roscow View Dr. , Seattle, in the amount of $6,827.52 for damage to auto which, ran off the end of Valley Parkway SW alleging City failed to sign Valley Parkway. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Appoilntment Mayor Shinpoch appointed John R. Tomkins as Police Officer Police Officer effective 10/4/81 subject to the new probationary period require- ment of one year. Tomkins certified by Civil Service to fill the vacant Renton Police Officer position. Council concur. Board of Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Kenneth Swanigan to Position#6 of Adjustm nt the Board of Adjustment for four year term effective to 9/6/85. Appoint ent Other Board Members: Position #1 Felix Campanella; #2 Da4id M. Young,; #3 Francis A. Holman; #4 James Dalpay; #5 Gerald Holman; #7 Barbara Lally. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Conselnt genda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ACCEPT CONSENT AGENDA AS Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Dean W. Bitney, Owner of Leisure Estates, 201 Union Leisulre Estates Ave. SE, described attempted purchase and rezone of 30 acre Mobile H.me Park parcel of property lying south of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park, re east of new King County shops property, east of Union Ave. SE Property and north of Maplewood Golf Course. The letter explained $3,000 Acquisition per month hold cost since option agreement 2/81 and advice that and Rezo e rezone request would not be acted upon until the Comprehensive Plan for. the Northeast Quadrant has been completed, that the date has slid and will probably not be finalized prior to option expira- tion.' The letter noted problems of meeting the Mobile Home Park Ordinance requiring a rezone to multiple designation prior to T mobile home designation; there being no T Comprehensive Mien desig- nation and noted rezoning area to multiple is upsetting to area residents. Bitney suggested revision to the City Code 4-714 T Trailer Parks and requested permission to present rezone request directly to Council as done previously on adjacent ten acres. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REFER COMMUNICATION TO COUNCIL'S PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. OLD BUSINESS Committee of Council President Stredicke presented Committee of the Whole the Whole report concerning Policy for Development in the Green River Valley Developm nt Policy Drainage Basin Area. The committee recommended referral of letter Green River Valley from the Federal Emergency Management Agency dated 8/20481 and Drainage Basin the Mayor's recommendations to the Council dated 9/4/81 , to the Planning and Development Committee for consideration. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Stredicke noted letter re flood insurance recommended Council disallow fill in certain areas pending further study and the matter sent to committee without recommendation. Six-Yar Capital The Committee of the Whole presented the Mayor's recommended Improvem-nt 'priorities for the Six-Year Capital Improvements Program without Program recommendation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT1HE 1 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.%', MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, AMEND MOTION, MOVE ITEM #5 (Cedar River Trail Acquisition, Thomas Property) TO ITEM #3; MOVED ITEM #9 (Heather Downs Acquisi- tion) TO ITEM #4. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, MOVE ITEM #8 (Construct Fire Station #14 in Kennydale and Relocate Sta. 12 in Highlands) TO ITEM #5. CARRIED. MOVED HUGHES, SECOND BY s'':v.-, c Z.. Renton City Council 9/14/81 P- e 4 Old Busine-s - Continued - Committee of the Whole - Continued Six-Year C-pital CLYMER, ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF LIGHTING BE DESIGNATED ATED ITEM #6 CARRIED. Improvement B AND ITEM FOR ADDITION TO LIBRARY of items for the Program Council President Stredicke listed priority Continued Six Year Capital Improvement Program: #1 . Maintenance Shop Facility _ in Renton Highlands; #2. Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Develop- ment; #3. Cedar River Trail Acquisition; #4. Heather Downs Park Property Acquisition; #5. Kennydale Fire Station; #6. Lighting 1 Replacement; #7. Library Addition; #8. Fire Training Facility; #9. New Computer System. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHI'LL, MOTION AS AMENDED BE ADOPTED. CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED.* L MOVE E Real Esta ` ess' MOVESESSION.BY STREDICKE, CARRIED. 9:08ND P.M. Counncillreconvened0atX9:�91P.M. Real Estal I Purchase `ROLL CALL: All Councilman present. OLD BUSIWSS Council President Stredicke inquired re response to citizen 1 Water Pre-sure questions re water mains and water pressure in Windsor Hills Questione. and Victoria Park areas. Mayor Shinpoch noted matter under investigation. Aviation gommittee Aviation Committee report re ADAP Project-5-53-0055-03 Overrun Chairman:1 explained final billing submitted on thi's project which included Stredic a $20,597.38 for FAA's portion of the overrun which has not been paid to the. Airport because there was no ADAP legislation allowing ADAP Project the original grant to be amended. The report stated the City will be asked to sign a grant amendment for that amount and FAA ,requires a resolution be passed authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign. The committee recommended Council approval and referral to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY TRIMM, APPROVE THE REPORT. CARRIED. Fancher Flyways The Aviation Committee report noted, meeting with Mrs. Wirz, of Leases Fancher Flyways and the matter of compulsory garbage service was satisfactorily agreed. The committee recommended the leases be reinstated and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the lease documents. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT THE AVIATION COMMITTEE REPORT AUTHORIZING THE MAYORIAND NARRIED. CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE LEASE DOCUMENTS OF FANCHER FLYWAYS. Aerodyn Leases Aviation Committee Chairman Stredicke noted negotiations with Aerodyne on three leases, that upon Attorney's advice, Aerodyne has been advised to deal directly with leasing party,The Boeing Company; and that Boeing Rep. Bob Morgan keeping City advised. . Transportation The Transportation Committee report recommended concurrence, with Committ-e Public Works Dept. for acceptance of completed Railroad Grade Final PII .yment Crossing Markings Project #RRS-OOS(19) and approve first and final SwanstoI and final payment of $10,752.07. The report also recommended Equipme t Co. release of retainage of $1 ,194. subject tI , SECOND to required Sclearances. (See Consent Agenda Page 2.) MOVED CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE! CARRIED. Planni g & Planning and Development Committee report was presented by Chairman Develo•�jnent Rockhill adding clarification to original committee report of Commit7e 8/24/81 regarding appeal of One Valley Place Properties for Pre- One Va ley Place liminary Planned Unit Development PPUD 032-81 and PPUD 044-81 . Appeal PPUD 032-81 The committee report stated that no error of fact and law were ncil and PPID 044-81 found in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to the City however, two clarifications should have been made to assist the Report ' ended Hearing Examiner: (1) Accessory Uses: Section 4-710(2) Accessory Uses usually incidental to allowed uses in P-1 Zone are clearly delineated; if non-permitted use proposed as primary use, then Conditional Use Permit request can be processed with Final PUD. (2) Height: Applicant's proposal to construct six story building exemplifies problem with ordinance only Council can address through police as ordinance has incompatible sections, such as 4-2702(L) and (M) allowing flexibility;- however Section 4-2709(1)B limits requirements. The committee report recommended Council determine the terms "lot size and setbacks" also address the general bulk dimensional requirements of the proposed structures, thus giving Examiner more review flexibility. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, ACCEPT AMENDED REPORT. CARRIED. - I Renton City Council 9/14/81 Page 5 Utility /Upon inquiry by Councilman Rockhill regarding priority of utility Priorities items concerning Six-Year Capital Improvements Program, Mayor Shinpoch explained needfor'separate funding. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, THE UTILITY PORTION OF SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BE REFERRED TO THE UTILITY COMMITTEE, SPECIFICALLY REFER- , R G TO HIGHLANDS TRUNK LINE. CARRIED. RDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final !readings Committee of the following ordinances which had been placed on first readings Chairman: Clymer 8/24/81 : Ordinance #3573 An ordinance was read adopting State Statutes by reference relating Criminal Liability to complicity and criminal liability of corporations and their agents. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3574 An ordinance was read adopting State Statute by reference relating Cause for Arrest to probable cause for arrest. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3575 An ordinance was read repealing Chapter 28 Title V Business Used Car Dealers Regulations of the City Code relating to Used Car Dealers ! in Licensing Pre- order to comply with State law. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, empted biy State ADOPT THE ORDINANCE WAS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: REED, SHANE, TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. • First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of :an ordinance amending the gambling tax as concerns tax payments. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROKCHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TOITHE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. i I Resolution #2418 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Park Funding authorizing application for funding assistance for outdoor recre- ation project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation as provided by Marine Recreation Land Act relating to acquisition of park site properties. (See Consent Agenda Page 2) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Voucher Payment The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council authorization for payment of Vouchers No. 35516 through No. 35767 in the amount of $1 ,292,822.78 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services rendered. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, APPROVE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS CounciL,President Stredicke inquired re notification procedure when signs on public right-of-way are picked up by the Public Council President Works Department, specifically noting florist stand in Highlands. Inquiries Stredicke complimented the Administrative Assistant and Departments involved Sunday in handling of sanitary sewer overflow in Earlington area. Council President Stredicke extended reminder of Tuesday Primary Election. Reply Received Mayor Shinpoch reported that reply has been received from;King County Executive Ron Dunlap to questions asked by Council President Stredicke during Dunlap's visit to Renton Council . Policy Optional Councilman Stredicke inquired of Police Representative Persson, for the record, policy in use of force or weapons in apprehending suspect. Lt. Persson explained Officer to use own judgment for appropriate response to individual situation taking all particulars into account. Land Use MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, LETTERS CONCERNING RALPH EVANS Inquiries INQUIRIES BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER STUDY. CARRIED. (See 8/17/81 Council Minutes. ) Insurance Councilman Reed requested information be forwarded to his 'committee Review for review of City insurance. II l Renton lity Council 8/14/81 Page 6 ADMINIST'ATIVE Mayor Shinpoch announced the sales tax receipts of the City are REPORT down $25,000. The State borrowed needed funds from New York, the Mayor noted everything State does has impact on the City. Mayor Shinpoch expressed regret in having granted an interview sometime ago which will be published shortly, explaining the City's financial situation has deteriorated since the interview. AUDIENCL COMMENT City Clerk Mead announced tabulation of votes for City Council Clerk's lOffice Position No. 3 following close of the, polls Tuesday, 9/14/81 Tabulat-s Votes Primary Election. ADJOURN ENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. ; CARRIED. 10: 15 P IM. - Delores A. Mead, C.M. City Clerk • ' I