Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
King County Dept of Assessments-Correspondence (1982-1985)
ORUTHE RIDDER adi KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 708 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104-2384 October 24, 1985 Dear Interested Citizen: I am pleased to enclose the King County Department of Assessments' 1985 Annual Report . The report provides answers to the questions most frequently asked of the Assessor , and also includes an historical summary of property tax in Washington State and relevant dates in the valuation and taxation process as well as an overview of our recent progress . In addition, the report contains a comprehensive set of tables , covering assessed valuations and taxes for each of the 166 taxing districts in King County. Included also are data summarizing the appraisal of over 530,000 commercial , industrial and residential properties , as well as over 80 , 000 personal property accounts . The total assessed valuation of King County property , for the 1985 tax roll , is $57. 1 billion dollars. The employees of the Department join me in hoping you find this report useful . If you have any questions or wish to make suggestions about this report or our programs and services , please call me at 344-2630. Sincerely, ZZit<-24(4e."--%-- Ruthe Ridder King County Assessor RR: ea • NG 111111UNTY DtARTMINT OF AJIIMINT 6 . . .. .....,..., . ...... .. , AK, ii - - ..,,,. 1 NIPP .' x .R �*a.ilb lbM� yi n*ta x ,_ , r gw,y: 4 . i . ' 1 a i ii t I i __ , . . ... ,......_ 1 1 `� . _ram _ t 1 • r all illr .. 1985 REP ORT RUTHE RIDDER, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR i • . Cover: Beneath an early evening sky, the lighted roof of the Kingdome silhouettes the clock tower of the King Street Station in a photograph taken by Robert Patrick, Commercial Appraiser in the Department of Assessments. Acknowledgements: This Annual Report reflects the dedication, profes- sionalism and hard work of the 255 employees of the King County Department of Assessments. The report was compiled by a special project team of Department employees: graphic arts designs, Leroy Knopp;statistical tabulation and layout, Donald Wirth;production liaison, F.J. Van de Putte; and editorial coordination and project supervision, Robert Gold. Special thanks to all of them. A MESSAGE In 1985 King County contains nearly 600,000 properties and accounts worth more than 57 billion dollars. The job of appraising from the the value of this real and personal property is complex and difficult. My goal, above all, is fairness. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR This past year has been a highly successful one for the King County Department of Assessments. In addition to the ongoing task of valuing properties, I have continued my efforts to revamp and im- prove the Department. In this report I want to highlight some of the steps taken to give you improved access to public information, bet- ter assessment practices, more efficiencies and improved employee morale. All of these changes were made without any increase in staff. A BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S TASK FORCE did a comprehensive review of the Department. This distinguished panel of volunteers worked longer than six months and submitted more than 80 recommendations for improving the organization and operations of the Department. I have already implemented many of them and am continuing to work on others. AN INTERNAL APPRAISAL IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE was established to recommend ways of improving assessments and internal procedures. This committee submitted over 40 recommen- dations, the majority of which are enacted or in the process of M! enactment. We have continued to expand PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES. The Department now initiates letters to owners of destroyed property to assure their awareness of available tax relief. The Department also insituted a new on-line computer system in the Public Information area. This system allows faster response to property inquiries and provides more types of information to the public. Seven well-attended Taxpayer Assistance Meetings to discuss property valuation were held throughout the County at times and places convenient to working people. We will continue to hold such meetings in the coming year. Finally, the Department published a Public Disclosure Index to its records, the first such In- dex published by County government. I am confident that it will be an indispensable aid to all citizens seeking access to our Depart- ment's records. All of these positive changes reflect hard work, thorough analysis and extra effort on the part of both staff and citizen volunteers. Department operations have already improved markedly because of them. I am personally gratified and grateful for their help. Ruthe Ridder King County Assessor Page TAX FACTS 1 What kinds of property are taxable? 1 How is the value of Real Property determined? 1 What do all the notations on my Valuation Change Notice mean? 2 How is the value of Personal Property determined? 3 What determines the amount of my property tax? 3 How are property tax rates(levies) established? 3 What are the statutory limitations on property taxes? 3 What do all the notations on my tax statement mean? 4 How do I qualify for a property tax exemption? 5 What publicly owned property is exempt? 7 What other kinds of property are tax exempt for non profit organizations? 7 How do I question or appeal the value placed on my property by the Assessor? 7 How do I obtain other information and assistance? 7 Information/Assistance Phone Numbers 8 TAX FIGURES 9 CONTENTS Comparison of School Taxes 1980-1984 10 1984 Taxes Payable 11 Assessed Valuations and Taxes State,County and Port Districts 12 Cities,Towns,Road and Library 14 School Districts 16 Water Districts 18 Fire Districts 20 Sewer Districts 22 Other Taxing Districts 23 Comparison of 1983 and 1984 Assessed Valuations and Taxes 24 Distribution of Taxes Billed Throughout King County 26 Distribution of Assessed Valuations 27 Percentage Distribution of the Property Tax Dollar 28 A Report on Progress 29 Trends 31 Important Dates Relating to Assessment and Taxation 35 Historical Summary of Property Taxes 37 What kinds of property are taxable? Under Washington State law,two types of property can be assessed and taxed. The first type is real property(real estate) which is land, improvements to the land (driveways, bulkheads, etc.) and any improvements (buildings, etc.) attached to the land. The second type is personal property.As defined by law taxable personal property includes agricultural machinery and equipment,manufacturer's, contractors's and logging machinery and equipment, office machinery and equipment, supplies and materials not held for sale and which do not TAXFACTS become an ingredient or component of an article being produced for sale. Furniture and fixtures in commercial use, leased equipment, certain leasehold improvements, franchises and easements of intra-county The following most frequently asked public utilities, lessee owned improvements on public land, aircraft, questions and answers will provide an motor vehicles and commercial vessels not subject to excise tax are also overview of the Assessor's responsibil- assessed and taxed as personal property. ities and the basis for them. Further Mobile homes and floating homes are valued and assessed as real prop- details regarding the programs that carry erty but are administered by the Personal Property Division. out these responsibilities are presented in the section entitled "A Report on All other items of personal property are taxable unless specifically ex- Progress"on page 29. empt by law. Types of personal property which are presently exempted include livestock, inventories held for resale, specific intangible property t One very important fact should be brought such as money, bonds, stocks or shares of private corporations, mort- gages, notes, etc. and personal effects and household goods in actual to your attention — The COUNTY use by the owner. ASSESSOR performs the role of an ap- praiser in placing a dollar value on your How Is the value of Real Property determined? home or other property. The Assessor does not establish the dollar amount of In Washington State, "assessment" for tax purposes means taxes required nor does she bill or collect establishing the full market value of your land and the improvements thereon. This is the job of an "appraiser." Appraisal methods used in the taxes. King County follow basic appraisal practices and procedures used by all appraisers in the profession. Three approaches may be utilized to determine real property value. They are: Cost: The reproduction or replacement cost new, less accrued depreciation. Market: The market data (sales comparison) approach. Income: The income or capitalization of economic rents approach. All three techniques are applied, if appropriate, in appraising improved commercial and industrial properties. The cost and market approaches are the basis of appraisal of improved residential properties. The market data approach is most often used to determine the value of vacant land. Whenever the Assessor revalues your property, you will receive a "Valuation Change Notice." (See form on page 2.) What do all the notations on my Valuation Change Notice mean? KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 700A KING COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 TELEPHONE (206)344-7304 VALUATION CHANGE NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE REAL PROPERTY HEREON DESCRIBED HAS BEEN CHANGED. THE NEW THE FULL VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY ACCOUNT NUMBER VALUE INDICATED APPLIES TO TOTAL VALUE LAND IMPROVEMENTS TAXES PAYABLE IN OLD VALUE ► 80,000 35,000 45,000 0 000000-0000-00 0 1986 0 NEW VALUE ► 100,00 50,000 50,000 Q 0010 0 NOTE TrIE PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AT ITS FULL VALUE LEVY CODE LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAILING ADDRESS LOT 1 & 2 BLOCK 21 YOUR NAME YOUR SUBDIVISION YOUR ADDRESS S /2 LOT 1 AND ALL LOT 2 2 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REVALUATION OF YOUR PROPERTY, ® PLEASE CALL US AT 344-7304. ASSISTANCE ON TAX MATTERS IS ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE KING COUNTY TAX ADVISOR. KING COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-TELEPHONE(206)344-5202. QUALIFICA- TIONS FOR EXEMPTIONS AND OTHER IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION ARE LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE. THIS NOTICE IS NOT A TAX STATEMENT, A Valuation Change Notice, (sample above), is mailed to the property owner each time the property is revalued for tax purposes. 0 Taxes payable in 1986 are based on 1985 assessment values. 0 Identifies combination of taxing districts in which property is located. Used as basis for distribution of assessed value and tax 0 Assessed Value of property prior to revaluation. dollars to taxing districts. Q Assessed Value of property afer revaluation. 0 If there are omitted assessments on the account, the message in this box reads: "This notice reflects property value that was not 0 Identification of property in Assessor's records included on the 1985 tax roll but will be included on the 1986 tax roll." The box may contain other messages such as notice of the time and location of Tax Payer Assistance Meetings. How is the value of Personal Property The State Constitution provides for taxing property at 100 percent of determined? appraised market value, with the appraisal process being the respon- sibility of the Assessor. The taxing district levy rates are enacted by Most personal property assessments are based upon information pro- the State Legislature. All levies above these statutory limits must be vided by the taxpayer on personal property affidavits furnished by the approved by a vote of the people, except for those of Port and Utility Assessor. The affidavits are mailed to taxpayers by January 1 each districts. year and must be returned to the assessor by March 31. The assessor may grant an extension of filing time if one is requested by the tax- What are the statutory limitations on payer on or before March 31. Penalties for late filing will be applied property taxes? unless 1) an extension has been granted or 2) the taxpayer provides, in writing, a statement of reasonable cause for the late filing. Statutory limitations on property taxation are established by Article 7, Section 2 (17th Amendment) of the Washington State Constitution The assessor uses the information provided by the taxpayer to make a (RCW 84.52.050) which limits the total "regular" property tax levy determination of value, taking into consideration the age, cost, and type to a maximum of $10.00 per $1,000.00 of property valuation. This of property. Whenever personal property is valued, a notice of valuation "1 %of value" limit* is subject to additional reduction since the above is mailed to the taxpayer. statute also imposes a 10% cut on all regular taxing district rates ex- cept those of fire and library districts. Thus, the effective levy limit What determines the amount of my property tax? becomes $9.15 per $1,000 of assessed value as shown below. A simplified answer is the cost of state and local government. This in- Below are the maximum dollar rates available to taxing districts for cludes operating costs of schools, city and county government, and 1985. (RCW 84.52.043). other taxing districts like the Port of Seattle, libraries, hospitals, fire, water and sewer districts. A large part of our property tax dollar goes Incorporated Unincorporated to pay off bonds for capital costs, such as building schools and other Taxing District' Area Area public projects. How are property tax rates (levies) established? County te $1.80 $1.80 3 Certain provisions of the State Constitution, statutory levies set by the Road Districts — 2.25 Legislature, and excess levies approved by the voters combine to Cities and Towns 3.60 — make up the total property tax levy. The tax rate on your property is Fire Districts — .50 the figure resulting from dividing the dollar amount of each taxing Library — .50 district levy by the total value of property in that particular district and Subtotal 9.00 8.65 then combining the rates of the various districts in which your prop- Floating .15 .502 erty is located. The assessed value of your home multiplied by the combined rate produces a tax amount which is your fair share of the TOTAL $9.15 $9.15 total levy in your area. The King County Finance Director issues tax statements and taxes are paid to his office. Notes: ' Existing levies of Port and Public Utility Districts are outside the $9.15 per The current statutory levy rates amount to a maximum of $9.15 for $1.0000 Assessed Value Limitation. each $1,000 of assessed property value. Distinction is made between Z Prorated beween overlapping Hospital, Fire and Library Districts. incorporated and unincorporated areas, but the total rate of each is limited to $9.15/$1,000. The only exceptions to this are Port and RCW 84.55.010 further limits the"regular levy" of any taxing district Utility District levies which are outside the statutory limitation. by restricting the regular levy amount in any year to 106% of the largest such amount levied in the three most recent previous years, In addition to statutory levies, excess levies are approved by the voters plus an additional amount calculated by multiplying the assessed as a way of paying off bonds for capital costs, but generally as a way of valuation of all new construction within the district by the previous providing supplemental funds for operating purposes. year's regular levy rate. The "106% limit" applies to taxing districts, not to individual properties. • Required levies which exceed the 1%limitation must be approved by the electorate of the districts making such"excess"or"special"levies. What do all the notations on my tax statement mean? BASED ON UARYS1, 1984ATEOF SEE REVERSE SIDE 1985 REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT PROPERTY TAX RP10 KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON ACCOUNT NUMBER 0 � `� O CURRENT TAX DISTRIBUTION CURRENT TAX INFORMATION H000000-0000-00V State School Support 283.26 Land Value 35,000 O .\1 . \ Local School Support 155.35 Improvements 45,000 O 0 County 125.32 Less Exempt Value City 244.90 TAXABLE VALUE 80,000 @ Road/Uninc. Levy Rate 10.63204 Port 30.23 General Tax 850.56 0 R% Fire Special Assessment 0 Sewer& or Water TOTAL CURRENT TAX , -85056 r BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON Library Omitted Taxes Other YOUR NAME Emergency Med Svc 11.50 Special Assessment TOTAL CURRENT TAX YOUR ADDRESS TOTAL CURRENT TAX 850.56 INCLUDING OMITS 800.65 OFirst half must be paid or post- marked by APRIL 30th or FULL ( DELINQUENT TAX INFORMATION 1 TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT INTEREST AND PAYABLE with YEAR PENALTY TAX LOT BLOCK CODE SEC TWP RG %ANNUAL INTEREST plus penalty (See Reverse Side) 0 1 & 2 21 0010 Second half tax becomes delin- quent after OCTOBER 31st. FULL AMOUNT MAY BE PAID APRIL 30th DELINQUENT TOTAL 4 TOTAL CURRENT AND DELINQUENTS Q Identification of your property in Assessor's records. vices.The city levy of $3.06132 is made up of a basic $2.21985 for operations and the Firemen's Pension Fund, $.23405 for a special 0 This area indicates the tax dollar breakdown showing the amount levy and $.60742 for bonds. Listed as "Other" in the "Current Tax distributed to each taxing district within which boundaries your pro- Distribution" section, is the Hospital District levy; or, if on Vashon perty lies. Island, the Cemetery District levy. Q These figures represent the assessed (market) value placed on your 0 This is the amount of tax you will have to pay. It was arrived at by property by the Department of Assessments. multiplying the total "Levy Rate" (E) by the "Taxable Value" in lO If you are a qualified senior citizen or disabled person in the $12,000 category (C). or less income cateogry, your assessed value exemption appears 0 Drainage district assessment (based on "benefit value" placed by the here. courts on acreage involved) and/or State Forest Fire Patrol assess- © This figure represents the total of levy rates that various governmental ment (based on a statutory "per acre" rate). units are charging this year to finance their operations. In the Seattle © Assessment for prior year or years, based on the assessed value and area the total rate is $10.63204 per thousand dollars of assessed levy rate of the year, or years, involved. value. The rate will be higher or lower in other county areas, depen- ding on the amount each governmental unit levies. 0 The "legal description" of your property. For example, the Seattle total is made up of the following rates: O There are two "tear off" half-year bills attached to the 1985 $3.54076 for the State School Fund, $1.56652 for county opera- detailed statement shown above, to accommodate payment in two tions, $.37786 for the Port of Seattle, $3.06132 for the city, installments. $1.94186 for schools and $.14372 for Emergency Medical Ser- How do I qualify for a property tax exemption? If you are a senior citizen or disabled person RCW 84.38.010 permits qualified Senior Citizen property owners to defer property tax payments on up to 80% of their equity in the proper- RCW 84.36.381 grants property tax exemptions to qualified senior ty. Such deferred taxes become a lien on the property, payable upon sale citizens and disabled persons as follows: or inheritance. A declaration to defer taxes must be filed with the King Income Range Levies Exempt County Assessor no later than thirty days before the tax is due. $12,001 to$15,000 100%of excess levies. If your total annual income is less than $1 5,000 (see schedule at left), and if you are 61 years of age or older - or you are retired because of $ 9,001 to$12,000 100% of excess levies, plus physical disability, or you are a widow or widower at least 57 years of $20,000 or 30%of valuation up to age whose spouse had an exemption on file in the Department of $40,000, whichever is greater, Assessments at the time of his(or her) death,you may apply for a senior exempt from all property tax. citizen/diabled person property tax exemption on the home you own as $ 9,000 or less 100% of excess levies, plus up to your principle place of residence. $25,000 or 50% of valuation, After you receive approval for senior citizen/disabled persons property whichever is greater, exempt from all tax exemption, you need not file annually. As long as you remain property tax. qualified you will automatically receive the exemption. Inflation and the rising cost of living have created undue hardships for the The chart below illustrates the substantial savings realized by taxpayers low income elderly and disabled homeowner. Exemption of a portion of through provisions of the senior citizen/disabled persons statutes this the property tax is of great benefit to these persons who wish to main- year. tain their own homes. Property tax exemption for elderly or disabled per- sons with incomes of $15,000 a year or less were allowed for taxes For further exemption and deferral information and application forms,call payable in 1985 on a total property value of $1,068,626,340. 344-7366. 5 AVERAGE TAX SAVINGS AVAILABLE TO QUALIFIED SENIOR CITIZENS/DISABLED PERSONS Number of Average Taxable Avg. Taxable Value Tax Savings" s" Savings Income Level n Participants Value After Exemption g Percentage 4 $ 9,000 or less 8,398 500 $24,900 Ratee 1 11.05428 Rate 7.57803 $413.77 69% 1.0 $59,300 $38,900 $ 9,000 - 12,000 5,312 Rate 11.05428 Rate 7.57803 $360.73 55% $12,001 15,000 4,834 $61,500 $61,500 $213.79 31% Rate 11.05428 Rate 7.57803 *Figures cited are for illustrative purposes only; actual tax savings depend on taxable value of subject property. If you have suffered destruction of property If you buy or sell real property RCWs 84.70.010 and 36.21.080 provide that if, on or before RCW 84.60.020 provides for proration of taxes on real property be- December 31 in any calendar year, any real or personal property placed tween vendor and purchaser. "When there is no express agreement as upon the assessment roll of that year is destroyed in whole or in part,the to payment of the taxes . . . due and payable in the calendar year of the true cash value of such property shall be reduced for that year (in an sale or the contract to sell,the (seller) shall be liable for the same propor- equitable amount as determined within further provisions of the law). tion of such taxes as the part of the calendar year prior to the day of the sale or the contract to sell bears to the whole of such calendar year, and If your land is not being used for its "highest and best the . . . purchaser shall be liable for the remainder of such taxes and use" subsequent taxes." Chapter 84.34 RCW provides special consideration to owners of proper EXAMPLE: If A sells a house to B on March 1st, 1985,A(the seller) pays ty wishing to have it assessed for taxation purposes on the basis of its current use, rather than its highest and best use. two months of the 1985 tax, and B (the purchaser) pays 10 months of the 1985 tax. This Open Space Act provides for current-use assessment of farm and agricultural land,timberland, and other open space land. Applications for classification are made to the Assessor for farm and agricultural land and If you are a "private" owner of timbered land to the County legislative authority for other classifications. Pursuant to the 1971 Forest Tax Law,all timber on privately and federal- Once land is classified, taxes are based on the current-use value of the ly owned land is exempt from ad valorem taxation (property tax).Timber land rather than its highest and best use. The Assessor must maintain is now subject to an excise tax paid at the time of harvest and ad- the current-use value for as long as the property remains classified. At ministered by the Department of Revenue. The timber excise tax is col- the same time, a record of the market value of the property is kept. This lected by the state for distribution to local taxing districts. value represents the value of the property if it were not classified. The Public timber, other than federal, which is sold after August 1, 1982 is 6 difference between the current-use value and the market value becomes the basis for computing the amount of additional taxes, penalties and in- subject to ad valorem taxation as personal property in addition to the ex terest that may become payable upon a change of use or removal from cise tax. However, any property tax paid on this timber may be claimed classification. Call 344-4169 for further information and application as a credit against the excise tax. forms. Forest land is still subject to the property tax under the 1971 Forest Tax Law. Land that has been either classified or designated under the law is If you plan to make physical improvements to your assessed in accordance with valuation schedules developed by the property Department of Revenue. The Assessor must determine which lands RCW 84.36.400 exempts from taxation any physical improvement to a qualify and must then assess the land according to forest land grades single family dwelling for the three assessment years subsequent to the certified by the Department of Revenue. completion of the improvement, up to 30% of the value of the original Land which has no higher and better use than growing and harvesting structure.Notice must be filed prior to completion of the improvement timber may be classified as forest land by the Assessor. Land which is being made, on forms furnished by the Assessor. being used to grow and harvest timber but which is more valuable for other uses, may be designated as forest land by the Assessor upon ap- plication by the landowner. To qualify as either classified or designated forest land, a parcel must be at least 20 acres in size and must be devoted primarily to growing and harvesting forest products. Both classified and designated forest land may be subject to compensating tax if the use of the land is changed. What publicly owned property is exempt? How do I question or appeal the value placed RCW 84.36.010 allows exemption of taxes to all publicly owned proper- on my property? ty, such as that of the Federal, State, County or City governments. Don't hesitate to contact us. Call or write the Assessor's office, (Room 700B, 344-7304),if you believe an error has been made in valuing your property. If it appears an error may have been made, the Assessor can conduct an Assessment Review within 60 days and, if indicated, adjust Is all church-owned property exempt? the assessed value of your property. RCW 84.36.020 allows exemption to church-owned property used for You can also appeal to the King County Board of Equalization,by July 15 church purposes. Property must be used for such things as church, park- of the year before the tax is due. If you don't agree with the County ing, parsonage, convent, caretaker's residence, and the land used Board's decision, you can appeal to the State Board of Tax Appeals.You therewith cannot exceed an area of five acres. must file with the State Board within 30 days of the County Board's rul- ing. You must present proof that the Assessor has erred in the appraisal. The information you present to the Board should show the sales of com- parable properties in your area.You should also submit other pertinent in- formation that describes the difference between the Assessor's value What other kinds of property are tax-exempt and what you believe to be the correct value. Assistance may be obtain- for non-profit organizations? ed from the King County Property Tax Advisor, (344-5202). RCW 84.36.030 through 84.36.060 allow exemptions of property How do I obtain other information and assistance? used for character building, benevolent, protective or rehabilitative social services, camp facilities, veterans and relief organizations, libraries, or- Anyone desiring information or having a question about the assessment phanages, day care centers, nursing homes and hospitals, schools and of their property should call 344-7304 or write the Department of colleges, art, scientific and historical collections,fire companies, humane Assessments, Room 700B, King County Administration Building, 500 societies, musical and artistic associations, and public assembly halls. Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104. 7 RCW 84.36.350 allows for exemption of sheltered workshops for the The Public Information Unit, Room 700A, is open weekdays from 8:30 handicapped. to 4:30 to the public for assessment information and research. A public service counter is staffed to assist you in securing property information you may be unable to locate on your own. Exemption must be claimed annually and ceases upon cessation In the event the information you desire is of a more technical and corn- of the exemption-qualifying use of the property. plicated nature, Public Information appraisers are available to assist you. See next page for other information/assistance phone numbers. INFORMATION / ASSISTANCE PHONE NUMBERS King County King County Department of Assessments Records and Elections Division Public Information 344-7304 General Information 344-2562 Property Values, Appraisal Help, Real Estate Excise Tax 344-3873 Comparable Sales, Legal Descriptions . . . . 344-7304 Plats, Condos and Surveys 344-4045 Personal Property 344-3914 Senior Citizen and King County Disability Exemptions 344- 4120 Office of Finance (TAXES) Senior Citizen and Real Estate/Property Tax Information 344-3850 Disability Deferrals 344- 4091 Personal Property Tax Information 344-4290 Home Improvement and Name and Address Change 344-2679 Destroyed Property Exemptions 344- 4091 Non Profit Organizations 344 4091 Local Improvement District Records 344-3913 8 Open Space 344- 4169 Property Tax Refunds 344-3413 Assessor's Office 344-2630 Property Tax Foreclosures 344-4184 Property Tax Information (see Office of Finance) Excise Tax (see Records and Elections) Director's Office 344-2626 Toll-Free Numbers for Rural Areas King County Residents in the following areas may reach offices in the King Property Tax Advisor County Courthouse and Administration Building by dialing as Property Valuation Questions and follows: Appeals Counseling 344-5202 Vashon and Maury Island 463-9184 North Bend, Fall City, Snoqualmie King County Preston and Carnation 888-3700 Board of Equalization Enumclaw, Black Diamond, Auburn, Property Valuation Appeals 344-3496 Federal Way,and Lester 939-5255 Washington State Board Toll-Free Number (Nation-wide) of Tax Appeals for King County Government Property Valuation Appeals (Olympia) 753-5446 Information 1-800-32 5-616 5 The value of King County properties,as reported on the tax rolls, based on 100% of assessed value, has increased over 850% dur- ing the past 20 years. The increase in assessed valuation from 1984 to 1985 was $2,906,770,959 or 5.36%, for a total assessed valuation of $57,131 ,698,908. The Appraisal Division of the Department of Assessments is TAX FIGURES responsible for appraising over 537,000 commercial, industrial 9 and residential properties in King County. Real property valuation increased $2,355,551 ,797 or 4.84% over the prior year, for a total of $51 ,065,053,407. The Personal Property Division assessed 82,572 separate ac- counts in 1985. Personal property valuation increased $551,219,162, or 9.99% over the prior year,for a 1985 total of $6,066,645,501. COMPARISON OF TAXES 1981 -1985 TOTAL TAXES LEVIED IN 1985 INCREASED S66,670,282 (11.9%) OVER 1984. BELOW IS A FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF TOTAL TAXES LEVIED FOR SCHOOLS State School King County Fund School Districts Total %Change 1981 $134,157,399 $ 82,119,456 $216,276,855 +16.6% 1982 148,346,008 93,975,586 242,321,594 + 12.0% 1983 165,730,596 138,096,227 303,826,823 + 25.4% 1984 178,955,453 11 9,036,971 297,992,424 - 1.9% 1985 200,977,050 138,464,789 339,441,839 + 13.9% As indicated by the charts below, local school support levies and state school fund levies take a substantial portion of the property tax dollar. 1981 1983 1985 10 $ 418,537, 427 $ 547,713,469 $624,695,430 11 51.67% 55.47% 54.34 $216,276,855 1982 $303,826,823 1984 $339,441,839 $ 460,859,021 $ 558,025,148 111 52.58 % 53.40% $242,321,594 $297,992,424 DISTRIBUTION OF TAXES BILLED THROUGHOUT KING COUNTY 1966 THROUGH 1985 Rural AI Other Tax State School Municipal Road Library County Taxing Avg.* Year Purposes Purposes Purposes Purposes Districts Purposes port Districts TOTALS Levy 1966. . $ 6,518,265.59 $ 60,922,307.65 $ 23,693,731.37 $ 4,371,335.17 $ 874,270.26 $14,389,062.66 $ 9,726,907.44 $ 1,951,750.13 $122,447,630.27 72.96 1967. . 7,865,256.30 75,172,267.55 25,461,207.02 4,808,604.93 961,717.60 15,670,334.59 10,471,373.40 2,564,723.53 142,975,484.92 77.82 1968. . 20,204,223.54 84,694,865.55 27,854,084.86 5,359,031.07 1,714,891.58 17,011,830.93 11,434,843.57 2,934,906.18 171,208,677.28 84.96 1969. . 22,871,304.80 103,496,285.01 30,885,074.81 6,328,991.76 1,772,112.46 24,899,141.40 8,185,999.45 3,769,631.51 202,208,541.20 88.66 1970. . 25,534,634.26 134,696,780.32 34,776,099.09 7,112,310.68 1,872,042.88 25,339,435.08 7,686,138.52 3,746,405.52 240,763,846.35 96.79 26 1971. . 26,489,369.39 155,568,917.42 37,711,325.30 7,136,970.70 2,725,137.62 29,574,297.92 11,354,425.56 4,181,222.14 274,741,666.05 52.00•• 1972. . 29,121,822.55 139,916,957.72 42,926,714.32 7,185,241.73 2,468,060.99 29,547,936.36 8,079,746.19 4,034,907.19 263,281,387.05 48.54 1973. . 20,685,403.13 167,943,017.84 43,660,385.85 8,408,563.86 2,122,080.88 28,938,998.13 8,752,729.53 4,694,291.75 285,205,470.97 45.51 1974. . — — 182,014,114.04 48,117,255.90 9,044,241.71 2,632,779.03 39,599,556.93 9,587,104.50 5,018,099.74 296,013,151.85 40.85 1975. . 58,034,509.79 159,333,211.77 47,261,238.95 9,621,860.85 2,685,426.56 41,315,803.28 9,479,754.16 5,525,582.50 333,257,387.86 21.905*•• 1976. . 64,280,182.35 54,811,116.21 54,831,180.80 10,324,980.95 2,359,321.30 44,490,358.33 10,243,353.70 5,937,770.78 247,278,264.42 14.800 1977. . 69,045,570.16 150,885,663.97 52,377,303.52 11,295,063.94 2,881,135.42 46,412,167.82 9,461,111.08 6,660,127.37 349,018,143.28 19.386 1978. . 81,218,559.66 133,148,458.30 56,077,315.70 12,408,997.17 3,450,813.51 50,299,262.43 11,103,048.31 7,048,601.58 354,755,056.66 17.214 1979. . 102,835,149.83 119,260,168.28 61,609,848.79 14,214,463.58 3,772,201.69 51,825,914.56 12,311,186.28 10,196,977.82 376,025,910.83 17.074 1980. . 114,302,179.25 71,217,913.99 65,584,096.76 16,100,825.60 4,078,942.37 58,883,405.30 13,658,244.05 15,165,948.96 358,991,556.28 14.545 1981. . 134,157,399.12 82,119,456.30 73,457,707.96 18,452,550.14 7,615,853.70 64,819,683.32 15,182,076.33 22,732,699.97 418,537,426.84 9.266 1982. . 148,346,007.82 93,975,586.06 78,591,934.49 20,172,123.55 7,950,255.83 69,525,929.98 16,616,182.56 25,681,000.36 460,859,020.65 9.678 1983. . 165,730,595.86 138,096,227.40 90,622,565.65 22,106,431.95 8,104,606.53 /b,240,b05.66 18,216,332.88 27,996,003.07 547,719,469.10 9.74732 1984. . 178,955,453.16 119,036,971.26 93,669,037.71 23,902,372.95 9,190,480.78 83,037,068.16 19,627,063.73 30,606,700.45 558,025,148.20 10.36127 1985. . 200,977,049.59 138,464,789.47 106,056,208.26 26,123,576.03 9,435,868.74 88,193,957.82 21,326,617.04 34,117,362.81 624,695,429.76 11.05428 Arithmetical Average '" Assessment Ratio Changed from 25% to 50% ***Assessment Ratio Changed from 50% to 100% COMPARISON OF 1984 AND 1985 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOLS, WATER, FIRE, SEWER, HOSPITAL DISTRICTS AND FLOOD ZONES 1984 1985 INCREASE OR DECREASE District Sled Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Tax Seattle 001 921,615,141,746 1.87888 $39,348,974 $22,451,938,663 $1.94186 $42,349,568 $ 836,796,917 $3,000,594 Laster 195 6,150,711 3.11951 19,187 5,383,648 4.46742 24,051 -767,063 4,864 Federal Way 210 2,584,009,633 1.79596 4,599,93 2,641,936,397 2.06373 5,403,012 57,926,764 803,049 Enumclaw 216 577,600,417 2.03238 1,143,175 602,427,872 3.09672 1,819,109 24,827,455 675,934 Mercer Island 400 1,126,518,679 4.11922 4,600,719 1,169,390,848 3.60174 4,175,439 42,872,169 -425,280 *line 401 3,343,049,195 2.00633 6,541,613 3,518,794,401 2.03037 6,983,975 175,745,206 442,362 Vashon 402 426,717,668 2.39955 1,002,347 431,702,880 2.40840 1,029,680 4,985,212 18,333 Renton 403 3,195,579,424 1.35641 4,267,361 3,328,523,738 2.24799 7,362,663 132,944,314 3,095,302 Skykomish 404 36,921,424 -- 141 38,334,187 -- -- 1,412,763 -141 Bellevue 405 5,919,951,044 2.29716 13,501,568 6,237,259,439 2.34070 14,462,281 317,308,395 960,713 South Central 406 621,170,763 3.213373 2,007,294 666,807,964 2.85616 1,879,622 45,637,201 -127,672 lower Snoq.Valley 407 270,842,491 3.36120 x.,012 277,573,370 3.26759 894,599 6,730,879 -3,413 Adam 408 1,562,418,460 2.38808 3,669,529 1,656,051,491 2.70631 4,410,625 93,603.031 741,096 2 5 Tahome 409 475,718,426 2.71965 1,270,563 487,785,673 3.41582 1,638,766 12,067,247 368,203 Snoquelme 410 489,476,032 1.88402 902,726 513,764,300 2.74804 1,383,660 24,2138,268 480,934 Issaquah 411 1,29,415,021 2.53789 3,256,699 1,395,659,501 2.89225 3,997,112 99,244,480 740,413 08iora1ne 412 1,994,926,146 2.72337 5,300,014 1,976,863,148 4.33741 8,356,488 -18,062,998 3,056,474 Lake Washington 414 3,950,086,980 2.78844 10,899,528 4,376,444,447 3.781334 16,428,082 426,357,467 5,528,554 Kent 415 3,003,931,553 3.22791 9,5913,782 3,265,687,914 3.00373 9,717,567 261,756,361 118,785 Nortluhore 417 1,559,997,301 3.94683 6,081,245 1,701,586,453 3.58791 6,039,497 141,589,152 -41,748 Ate BBB 56,504,431 2.34970 127,531 59,270,413 2.07300 117,994 2,765,982 -9,537 TOTAL SCHOOLS $54,113,157,545 9119,036,971 $56,803,186,747 $138,464,790 $2,690,029,202 $19,427,819 Miter Watts $13,481,595,580 $-- $ 8,092 $17,218,629,380 $-- $ 3,012 $3,737,033,800 $ -5,080 Fee Districts 17,145,716,865 -- 18,458,474 17,814,685,63 -- 20,837,625 rn.,968,828 2,379,151 Sewer Districts 10,847,396,864 -- -- 11,464,339,331 -- -- 616,942,467 -- Hospital Districts 12,800,709,755 -- 4,746,883 13,811,557,825 -- 5,240,472 1,010,848,070 493,589 Rood Zone Districts 7,032,196,795 -- -- 7,611,239,276 -- -- 579,042,481 -- Cemetery Daaicts 426,717,668 .05941 25,211 431,702,880 .06295 27,000 4,985,212 1,789 TOTAL MISC.DISTRICTS $23,238,660 $26,108,109 $2,869,449 GRAND TOTAL TAX KING COUNTY $558,025,148 $624,695,430 $66,670,282 COMPARISON OF 1984 AND 1985 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES STATE, COUNTY, PORT, ROAD, EMERGENCY MEDICAL, COUNTY LIBRARY, CITIES AND TOWNS 1984 1985 INCREASE OR DECREASE 0.stnct Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Levy Rate Tex Assessed Value Tax State $54,224,927,949 $3.31752 S178,955,453 S57,131,698,908 $3.54016 S200,977,050 $2,906,770,959 $22,021,597 County 54,113,157,545 1.54780 83,037,068 56,803,186,747 1.56652 •r:,193,958 2,690,029,202 5,156,890 Port 54,113,157,545 .36460 19,627,064 56,803,186,747 .37786 21,326,617 2,690,029,202 1,699,553 Road District 17,442,003,378 1.37630 23,902,373 18,068,985,333 1.45321 26,123,576 626,981,955 2,221,203 Emergency Medical Services 54,113,157,545 .13904 7,368,040 56,803,186,747 .14372 8,009,253 2,690,029,202 641,213 County Library 17,442,003,378 .52636 9,190,481 18,068,985,333 .52218 9,435,869 626,981,955 245,388 TOTAL $322,080,479 $354,066,323 $31,985,844 Seattle $21,231,011,426 S2.76032 $57,632,601 $22,048,405,299 $3.06132 $66,467,245 $ 817,393,873 $8,634,644 Algona 34,270,978 2.38343 79,483 38,310,729 2.25020 84,094 4,039,750 4,611 Auburn 1,142,001,512 2.44847 2,776,291 1,227,486,260 2.65280 3,233,215 85,484,748 456,924 Beaux Ms 13,455,419 3.21931 43,317 13,461,659 4.06147 54,756 26,440 11,439 Bellevue-1 2,016,082,568 2.17814 4,383,884 2,161,210,926 2.01981 4,358,139 145,128,360 -25,745 24 Bellevue-4 598,901,793 2.12476 1,271,177 636,132,221 2.01739 1,282,469 37,230,428 11,232 Bellevue-5 1,792,663,191 2.07350 3,710,566 1,861,342,287 1,99280 3,702,902 68,659,096 -7,664 Bellevue-6 76,618,549 1.99493 152,754 79,951,198 1.95332 155,901 3,332,649 3,147 Bellevue-7 4,993,853 1.90464 9,512 5,021,132 1.90033 9,542 27,279 30 Black Diamond 29,665,463 1.12335 32,512 29,598,236 1.22281 35,241 -67,227 2,729 Bothell 266,547,721 3.22622 831,131 262,751,124 3.35830 812,545 2,203,403 41,414 Carnation 19,390,634 3.45956 65,158 21,041,976 3.60815 74,290 1,651,342 9,132 Clyde Hill 185,836,538 1.13498 210,830 1::,486,243 1.20000 226,052 2,649,705 15,222 Des Moines 306,786,221 1.70368 520,164 389,533,404 1.81657 703,462 82,747,163 183,298 Duvall 24,762,676 3.17434 77,562 29,541,359 3,18608 109,951 4,778,683 32,389 Enumclaw.. .... 172,766,270 2.54312 430,452 189,::4,185 3.117:•: 577,274 17,116,915 146,822 Hunts Point 88,160,074 .74392 65,569 B6,852,569 .81128 70,462 -1,307,505 4,893 Issaquah 223,609,443 3.04920 676,064 273,098,237 3.04467 826,579 49,488,794 150,514 Kent 1,700,623,601 2.56598 4,352,392 1,912,534,739 2.41603 4,610,125 211,911,138 257,733 Kirkland-1 408,504,264 2.08618 842,072 458,592,579 2.31249 1,046,179 50,i :,315 204,107 IGrdand-3 225,476,883 1.94729 437,452 260,224,036 2.19154 567,746 34,747,153 130,296 KGrkland•4 273,461,082 2.03441 554,602 293,274,492 2.26955 6E3,047 19,813,410 108,445 Lake Forest Park-1 66,064,874 2.67845 175,419 62,176,890 2.74440 169,181 -3,x7,984 -6,238 Lake Forest Park-2 26,899,012 1.98252 53,169 25,579,038 2.25179 57,419 -1,319,974 4,250 Medina 270,193,624 .98824 266,611 274,857,780 1.04818 286,951 4,664,156 20,340 Mercer Island 1,126,518,679 2.32538 2,615,134 1,169,390,846 2.71702 3,166,616 42,872,169 551,482 Milton 14,030,648 2.79490 38,752 14,356,831 2.72760 38,571 326,183 -181 Normandy Park 254,250,339 3.30738 839,566 252,424,678 3.37500 849,895 -1,825,661 10,329 North Bend 53,708,191 2.56642 135,710 58,::,,432 2.49612 145,155 5,178,241 9,445 Pacific 55,694,736 1.86542 102,511 60,820,534 1.82569 108,974 5.125,798 0461 Redmond 1,361,565,033 241236 3976157 1,588,t19639 2.222697 3,b/2,1196 244,554,606 295,944 1,//3,619,154 2.73338 4,820,288 1.869,671,411 3.09176 5,746,376 96,652,257 920,i:: Skykomish 6,186,105 3.37500 20,641 6,467,951 3.37500 21,544 281,846 903 Snoqualmie 32,620,877 2.55473 81,124 33,831,528 2.48623 82,604 1,210,651 1,480 Tukwila 711,331,178 2.51996 1,791,071 746,970,189 2.64215 1,971,519 35,639,011 180,448 Yarrow 89,461,558 1.09046 97,345 85,893,514 1.33152 114,150 -3,567,984 16,805 TOTAL Cities @Towns $36,671,154,167 $93,669,038 $38,734,201,414 $106,056,208 $2,063,647,247 $12,387,170 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES OTHER TAXING DISTRICTS FLOOD CONTROL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy TI • Name Land Improvements Other' Total Rate T Cumberland County $ 2,514,613 $ 2,518,600 $ 554,836 $ 5,588,049 $-- $ Enumclaw City 56,996,550 107,508,300 25,378,335 189,883,185 -d' Enumclaw-County 86,026,216 80,240,181 21,198,647 187,465,644 Evans Creek-Crty 7,115,010 1,575,700 8,895,512 17,586,222 -- Evans Creek-County 127,424,609 191,635,600 15,119,551 334,179,760 Green River City 1,101,479,830 2,126,667,286 762,992,649 3,991,139,765 Green River-County 482,996,761 662,023,182 123,344,474 1,468,364,417 Green Water-County 718,912 343,000 7,409 1,069,321 --- Kimball Creek City 5,568,900 11,055,600 2,988,493 19,612,993 -- Kimball Creek County 4,378,513 5,061,200 511,410 9,951,123 - Patterson Creek County 50,326,332 24,757,520 3,821,828 78,905,6813 - -- Sikes County 23,622,087 22,026,700 3,687,771 49,336,558 - S.W.Lake Sammamish-Crty 77,328,200 138,141,800 56,711,099 272,181,099 S.W.Lake Sammamish County 177,373,860 262,149,621 8,047,226 447,570,707 W.Lake Sammamish-City 189,191,800 322,399,500 8,511,307 520,102,607 --W.Lake Sammamish-County 8,668,467 9,482,900 151,379 18,302,748 -- TOTAL $2,401,730,660 $4,167,586,690 $1,041,921,926 $7,611,239,276 $-- HOSPITAL DISTRICTS 23 Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy TOTAL No. Land Improvements Other' Total Rate TAX 1-City $1,121,036,260 $2,068,614,573 $ 983,709,460 $4,173,360,293 6.27673 $1,146,673 1 County 966,219,968 1,790,137,967 142,896,547 2,899,254,482 27673 791,%5 2-City 1,021,492,923 1,504,926,654 283,316,418 2,E09,735,995 .4::.2 1,365,743 2-County 1,276,628,211 1,970,743,755 166,061,197 3,413,433,163 . :,2 1,660,932 4 Crty 25,978,333 51,111,800 15,627,827 92,717,960 54342 49,129 4-County 179,914,307 190,362,935 52,778,690 423,055,932 54342 228,630 TOTAL $4,591,270,002 $7,575,897,684 $1,644,390,139 $13,811,557,825 $5,240,472 DRAINAGE DISTRICTS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICTS No. Total Benefits Levy Rate Tax Name Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax 1 $2,871,774 $54.94165 $157,938 Coalfield $ 206,609,235 $ $2 2,057,136 .97223 2,012 Shoreline 1,973,381,707 5 2,287,518 -- -- Vashon 431,527,170 6 6,027,221 1.82506 11,013 7 6,771,427 .14768 1,002 MISCELLANEOUS 13 2,678,381 1.56812 4,201 TOTAL $22,693,451 $176,166 Name Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax As Pollution $56,803,186,747 $ S County Airport 431,702,1380 Metro 56,803,186,747 -- FOREST PATROL Cemetery-1 431,702,:11 06295 2',000 Acres levy Rate Tax 440,928 $27000 $152,400 'Includes Personal Property, State Public Service,and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SEWER DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy TOTAL Name Land Improvements Other' Total Rate TAX Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge-City $ 431,900 $ 221,200 $ 3,493 $ 656,593 $ — — $ — — Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge-County 66,677,700 89,145,100 2,446,000 158,268,800 — — — — Cascade-City 5,849,040 9,365,800 2,512,772 17,727,612 — — — — Cascade-County 333,018,510 658,658,048 45,448,182 1,037,124,740 — — — — Des Moines-City 138,021,600 251,068,499 29,185,692 418,275,791 — — — — Des Moines-County 207,654,618 403,599,200 58,452,490 669,706,308 — — — — East Mercer 21,514,200 33,529,000 769,329 55,812,529 — — — — Eastgate-City 110,040,500 181,620,200 9,755,424 301,416,124 — — — — 2 2 Eastgate-County 208,388,607 344,386,321 16,268,112 569,043,040 — — liighlands 23,889,300 27,801,300 133,752 51,824,352 — — — — Lakehaven-City 2,913,900 5,989,300 4,587,045 13,490,245 — — — — Lakehaven-County 752,263,572 1,164,813,945 161,256,018 2,078,333,535 — — — — Mercer Island 461,796,050 602,456,499 27,605,298 1,091,857,847 — — — — N.E.Lake Washington-City 68,394,400 97,127,900 17,349,832 182,872,132 -- — — — N.E. Lake Washington-County 571,273,380 1,042,574,815 67,641,647 1,681,489,842 — — — — Rainier Vista 102,921,740 196,455,045 14,084,799 313,461,584 — — — — Ronald-City 587,100 1,467,300 51,482 2,105,882 — — — — Ronald-County 326,268,130 568,114,987 46,744,418 941,127,535 — — — — Sahalee 69,535,084 142,192,800 3,631,107 215,358,991 — — —S.W.Suburban-City 52,581,200 96,998,900 1,522,471 151,102,571 — — — S.W.Suburban-County 380,843,390 666,333,693 49,704,011 1,096,881,094 — — — — Stevens Pass 1,370,622 1,370,622 — — — — Summit 3,354,910 10,918,100 1,899,643 16,172,653 — — — — Val Vue-City 265,100 458,900 28,791 752,791 — — — — Val Vue-County 106,778,040 220,511,500 41,564,714 368,854,254 — — — — Vashon Island 9,667,990 13,269,800 6,314,074 29,251,864 — — — — TOTAL $4,024,929,961 $6,829,078,152 $610,331,218 $11,464,339,331 $ — — 'Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES FIRE DISTRICTS (CONT.) Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy No. Land Improvements Other t TOTAL Rate TOTAL TAX r. 38 $ 307,189,156 $ 513,724,966 $ 49,824,422 $ 870,738,544 $1.61605 $ 1,402,901 37-County 369,699,837 655,244,355 64,352,014 1,089,296,206 1.11872 1,211,625 31-1 City 263,000 240,800 61,233 565,033 .11872 67 38 65,569,150 103,028,715 16,944,695 185,542,560 .94711 174,349 39-County 843,330,212 1,270,461,745 186,269,878 2,300,061,835 1.52426 3,487,533 39-1 County 99,463,088 146,918,650 13,896,738 260,276,476 1.52426 392,523 39-3 Coy 1,335,600 2,935,700 103,422 4,374,722 .00943 41 39-5 City 2,521,200 3,511,900 95,224 6,128,324 .16449 1,008 39-8 County 10,667,500 21,157,600 1,439,192 33,264,292 .00943 303 21 39-9 City 11,638,300 24,980,900 3,823,649 40,442,849 .00943 378 40 190,510,670 428,863,448 26,737,627 646,111,745 1.00000 643,976 41-County 367,535,840 685,884,735 41,543,246 1,094,963,821 .99976 1,091,003 41-2 Ctty - - - 49,034 49,034 - - 1 42 County 84,299,390 112,564,937 15,151,023 212,015,350 1.02047 215,628 42-1 Coy 3,104,100 2,550,100 160,462 5,814,662 .04818 274 43-County 236,318,547 273,642,552 41,802,419 551,763,518 1.44113 787,439 43-9 County 1,819,790 625,700 93,340 2,538,830 .44113 1,120 44-County 146,711,720 189,690,118 17,367,165 353,769,003 1.26746 446,397 44-1 City 87,000 40,300 47,224 174,524 .26746 47 45-County 69,342,024 37,630,786 8,547,330 115,520,140 1.21648 139,605 45-1 Coy 378,600 208,200 8,822 595,622 .21648 129 48 60,262,242 56,670,069 7,391,349 124,323,660 1.00000 123,767 47 13,099,380 9,029,400 3,792,262 25,921,042 .75032 19,249 49 3,390,710 10,918,100 1,907,353 16,216,163 .71906 11,660 50 10,263,201 8,632,800 7,044,803 25,940,804 1.19395 30,797 "Total-Incorporated $ 167,022,100 $ 294,600,599 $ 34,268,763 $ 495,891,462 - - $ 392,419 ""Total-Unincorporated $6,432,832,915 $9,848,444,890 $1,144,231,837 $17,425,509,642 - - 20,445,206 Grand Total $20,837,625 t Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES FIRE DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy No. Land Improvements Other t TOTAL Rate TOTAL TAX 1 $ 82,491,600 $ 93,252,100 $161,404,865 $ 337,148,565 $1.52423 $ 511,060 2 287,619,210 478,877,103 58,190,872 824,687,185 1.00000 819,132 4-1 Coy 4,916,500 11,237,500 164,353 16,318,353 .01630 262 4-County 550,876,470 948,178,118 58,425,858 1,557,480,446 1.01630 1,570,192 5 40,981,300 57,976,500 2,388,732 101,346,532 .57228 57,379 10-County 495,438,128 647,517,489 54,589,372 1,197,544,989 1.19109 1,422,350 10-1 City 7,085,700 1,017,500 189,020 8,292,220 .02134 177 10-2 County 904,700 1,200,300 79,848 2,184,848 1.15185 2,524 10-3 City 1,080,900 313,400 4,627 1,398,927 .19109 267 10-8 County 7,652,430 17,791,500 794,886 26,238,816 .03924 1,019 20 10-9 County 1,819,790 625,700 93,340 2,538,830 .03924 100 11 355,870,030 646,893,805 56,018,132 1,058,781,967 1.00000 1,044,255 13 241,052,295 166,459,286 24,191,299 431,702,880 .55596 238,462 14 155,924,557 243,131,982 15,580,139 414,636,678 1.06625 441,261 16-County 279,204,990 416,345,147 28,671,471 724,221,608 1.11851 805,254 16-1 Coy 769,500 1,444,800 74,445 2,288,745 .11851 271 17 34,537,022 29,102,100 2,467,234 66,106,356 .24907 16,385 18 42,544,160 77,104,367 13,648,381 133,296,908 1.00000 132,074 20 121,175,200 188,402,700 7,170,862 316,748,762 1.00000 312,382 24-County 151,740,100 316,811,300 54,060,984 522,612,384 1.88122 945,830 24-1 County 49,815,400 106,140,600 6,701,356 162,657,356 1.76035 281,024 24-8 10,667,500 21,157,600 1,439,192 33,264,292 .80288 25,763 25-County 170,396,520 360,688,846 22,467,590 553,552,956 1.00000 551,195 25-1 City 22,762,200 29,552,700 2,171,904 54,486,804 - - - - 25-2 County 4,735,320 6,247,600 2,781,166 13,764,086 1.00000 13,489 26-(Sty 122,095,100 241,204,099 25,876,852 389,176,051 1.00000 387,014 26-County 38,225,200 64,841,500 5,091,235 108,157,935 1.00000 107,300 27-County 41,019,103 48,436,700 9,335,282 98,791,085 1.41133 136,952 27-1 City 577,100 272,600 5,187,899 6,037,599 .41133 2,483 28 111,701,677 110,419,381 18,176,253 240797.911 61370 103,430 31 6,690,000 9,1b I,4UU 535,762 16,377,722 .72675 11,734 34 263,225,434 300,047,170 33,421,533 596,694,137 1.00000 595,419 35 County 39,679,272 28,313,520 6,261,287 74,254,079 .94010 69,366 35-1 Coy 45,600 71,000 74,242 190,842 - - - - t Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES WATER DISTRICTS (CONT. ) Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value No, Unincorporated Incorporated TOTAL Levy Rate TOTAL TAX 83 $ 28,887,581 $ 61,740,747 $ 90,628,328 $ — — $ — — 85 51,984,173 — — 51,984,173 — — 86 50,868,521 57,500 50,926,021 — — — — 87 6,978,438 11,423,099 18,401,537 — — — — 15,911,020 15,911,020 90 344,449,501 3,283,095 347,732,596 — — — — 94 8,255,857 — 8,255,857 — — — — 19 104 986,801,110 48,881,817 1,035,682,927 — — — — 105 521,004,413 — — 521,004,413 — — — 107 463,044,343 161,205,695 624,250,038 — — — — 108 327,726,803 — — 327,726,803 — — — — 111 236,502,679 — — 236,502,679 — — — — 117 4,786,215 — 4,786,215 — — — — 119 51,229,772 — — 51,229,772 — — — — 122 10,082,323 — 10,082,323 — — 123 4,817,465 — — 4,817,465 — — — — 124 2,018,689,380 29,434,373 2,048,123,753 — — — — 125 323,653,557 37,381,146 361,034,703 — — — — 127 46,938,856 — — 46,938,856 — — — — 998 162,965,941 — — 162,965,941 — — — — 9gg 1,494,508,945 131,530,907 1,626,039,852 — — — — TOTAL $12,097,445,808 $5,121,183,572 $17,218,629,380 $3,012 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES WATER DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value No. Unincorporated Incorporated TOTAL Levy Rate TOTAL TAX 01 $ — — $ 43,408,164 $ 43,408,164 $ — — $ — — 14 57,912,514 251,900 58,164,414 — — — — 19 111,786,147 — — 111,786,147 — — — 20 670,644,806 — 670,644,806 — — 25 26,380,676 686,797 27,067,473 — — — — 42 568,399,067 224,380,061 792,779,128 — — — — 45 48,100,039 — — 48,100,039 — — — — 1 8 49 428,287,573 23,851,710 452,139,283 — — — — 54 2,644,865 101,255,586 103,900,451 .02896 3,000 56 128,955,863 52,399,062 181,354,925 — — — — 57 5,159,206 — — 5,159,206 — — — — 58 821,573,106 13,851,441 835,424,547 — — — — 63 58,923,771 — — 58,923,771 — — — — 68 18,797,220 2,824,108,562 2,842,905,782 — — 12 68-1 — — 127,834,210 127,834,210 — — — — 69 24,725,669 — — 24,725,669 — — — 75 1,156,085,551 493,119,203 1,649,204,754 — — — 77 44,278,119 — — 44,278,119 — — — — 79 9,155 2,439 11,594 — — — — 79-1 2,895 — — 2,895 — — — — 81 340,614,993 731,096,058 1,071,711,051 — — — — 82 424,077,680 — — 424,077,680 — — — ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICTS PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Personal State Public Omitted Assessed Value Levy TOTAL Property t Service t Assessments t TOTAL Rate TAX District $1,721,552,336 $ 536,814,831 S40,329,844 $22,451,938,663 $ 1.94186 $ 42,349,568 Seattle 001 29,630 1,069,092 — — 5,383,648 4.46742 24,051 Lester 195 117,366,664 73,360,531 3,364,438 2,641,936,397 2.06373 5,403,012 Federal Way 210 46,419,359 18,102,992 893,954 602,427,872 3.09672 1,819,109 Enumclaw 216 12,806,883 14,498,433 154,829 1,169,390,848 3.60174 4,175,439 Mercer Island 400 108,021,612 377,544,078 3,199,182 3,518,794,401 2.03037 6,983,975 Highline 401 12,598,674 10,626,225 87,610 431,702,880 2.40840 1,020,680 Vashon 402 467,330,684 120,738,881 3,759,908 3,328,523,738 2.24799 7,362,663 Renton 403 1 3,667,209 2,454,697 — — 38,334,187 — — — — Skykomish 404 334,673,380 149,655,935 12,454,068 6,237,259,439 2.34070 14,462,281 Bellevue 405 61,609,479 14,139,298 2,582,183 666,807,964 2.85616 1,879,622 South Central 406 13,049,623 7,331,886 48,244 277,573,370 3.26759 894,599 Lower Snoqualmie 407 323,151,680 43,698,313 1,775,559 1,656,051,491 2.70631 4,410,625 Auburn 408 23,136,917 13,395,085 507,764 487,785,673 3.41582 1,638,766 Tahoma 409 41,162,667 21,973,880 159,758 513,764,300 2.74804 1,383,660 Snoqualmie Valley 410 38,286,535 34,185,233 2,321,876 1,395,659,501 2.89225 3,997,112 Issaquah 411 38,008,855 25,037,099 3,404,195 1,976,863,148 4.33741 8,356,488 Shoreline 412 157,623,599 115,894,963 2,563,625 4,376,444,447 3.78834 16,428,082 Lake Washington 414 344,487,638 95,662,385 6,925,645 3,265,687,914 3.00373 9,717,567 Kent 415 69,106,191 35,337,292 1,066,486 1,701,586,453 3.58791 6,039,497 Northshore 417 6,065,425 758,003 — — 59,270,413 2.07300 117,994 Fife 888 $3,940,155,040 $1,712,379,132 $85,599,168 $56,803,186,747 $138,464,790 TOTAL t Boats, Class II, included in this column. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICTS REAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Assessed Value State Public Omitted District Land Improvements Total Service-Real Assessments' 001 Seattle $ 8,297,649.428 $11,691,333,278 $19,988,982,706 $162,979,046 $ 1,279,900 195 Lester 2,811,983 69,700 2,881,683 1,403,243 — — 210 Federal Way 959,973,240 1,482,976,917 2,442,950,157 4,109,107 785,500 216 Enumclaw 256,189,267 273,729,174 529,918,441 6,868,926 224,200 400 Mercer Island 492,314,650 648,203,899 1,140,518,549 1,270,354 141,800 401 Highline 1,075,165,440 1,945,090,907 3,020,256,347 8,989,582 683,600 402 Vashon 241,052,295 166,459,286 407,511,581 790,690 88,100 16 403 Renton 925,486,050 1,775,628,767 2,701,114,817 28,270,048 7,309,400 404 Skykomish 16,304,248 12,113,300 28,417,548 3,794,733 — 405 Bellevue 2,299,958,307 3,383,905,747 5,683,864,054 56,326,602 285,400 406 South Central 169,479,650 415,560,567 585,040,217 2,618,887 817,900 407 Lower Snoqualmie 155,647,507 100,704,958 256,352,465 791,152 — 408 Auburn 472,452,651 807,131,979 1,279,584,630 7,655,409 185,900 409 Tahoma 236,361,233 211,807,452 448,168,685 2,353,022 224,200 410 Snoqualmie Valley 207,857,170 238,580,835 446,438,005 3,739,590 290,400 411 Issaquah 595,800,557 121,537,288 1,317,337,845 2,770,012 758,000 412 Shoreline 711,856,720 1,197,560,118 1,909,416,838 898,661 97,500 414 Lake Washington 1,593,341,789 2,482,114,059 4,075,455,848 24,906,412 — — 415 Kent 1,046,417,443 1,753,742,773 2,800,160,216 18,149,630 302,400 417 Northshore 637,665,916 952,410,750 1,590,076,666 5,738,318 261,500 t: Rfe 20,702,200 31,688,200 52,390,400 56,585 — — TOTAL $20,414,487,744 $30,292,349,954 $50,706,837,698 $344,480,009 $13,735,700 "Levies for omitted assessments vary with each year ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value t Personal State Public Omitted Assessed Value Property Service-Personal Assessments TOTAL Levy TOTAL TAX $1,513,874,356 $ 533,092,303 $38,501,076 $22,048,405,299 $ 3.06132 $ 66,467,245 Seattle 3,284,875 782,972 33,640 38,310,728 2.25020 84,094 Algona 307,718,357 33,238,096 1,739,227 1,227,486,260 2.65280 3,233,215 Auburn 125,459 - 13,481,859 4.06147 54,756 Beaux Arts 164,798,042 73,578,765 4,993,464 2,161,210,928 2.01981 4,358,139 Bellevue-1 34,733,198 13,168,018 4,513,634 636,132,221 2.01739 1,282,409 Bellevue-4 82,451,314 42,334,322 1,021,341 1,861,342,287 1.99280 3,702,902 Bellevue-5 5,471,897 793,828 312,474 79,951,198 1.95332 155,901 Bellevue-6 111,100 - - 5,021,132 1.90033 9,542 Bellevue-7 3,197,703 1,832,097 66,218 29,598,236 1.22281 35,241 Black Diamond 20,785,392 7,596,966 96,083 262,751,124 3.35830 872,545 Bothell 465,188 1,113,508 1,652 21,041,976 3.60815 74,290 Carnation 277,642 1,603,847 2,154 188,486,243 1.20000 226,052 Clyde Hill 11,180,537 12,328,826 329,606 389,533,404 1.81657 703,462 Des Moines 1,642,104 740,916 4,090 29,541,359 3.18608 109,951 Duvall 19,091,844 5,204,024 650,328 189,883,185 3.11788 577,274 Enumclaw 312,069 - - 86,852,569 .81128 70,462 Hunts Point 11,251,409 7,320,322 150,295 273,098,237 3.04467 826,578 Issaquah 337,882,226 55,483,294 6,731,485 1,912,534,739 2.41603 4,610,125 Kent 1 5 22,170,703 18,068,172 346,340 458,592,579 2.31249 1,046,179 Kirkland-1 15,492,232 5,283,987 268,432 260,224,036 2.19154 567,748 Kirkland-3 6,942,376 4,840,794 128,483 293,274,492 2.26955 663,047 Kirkland-4 981,130 387,454 5,306 62,176,890 2.74410 169,181 Lake Forest Park-1 211,947 271,687 3,404 25,579,038 2.25179 57,419 Lake Forest Park-2 494,721 2,410,088 - - 274,857,780 1.04818 286,951 Medina 12,806,883 14,498,433 154,829 1,169,390,848 2.71702 3,166,616 Mercer Island 4,441,127 132,114 - - 14,356,831 2.72700 38,571 Milton 3,353,898 3,113,164 30,416 252,424,678 3.37500 849,895 Normandy Park 4,209,647 3,763,843 16,693 58,886,432 2.49612 145,155 North Bend 3,218,835 1,099,061 8,823 60,820,534 1.82569 108,974 Pacific 120,742,211 42,761,191 3,019,234 1,606,119,639 2.22897 3,572,096 Redmond 349,753,365 89,149,224 2,423,948 1,869,671,411 3.09176 5,740,376 Renton 263,862 762,443 - - 6,467,951 3.37500 21,544 Skykomish 944,145 4,671,394 13,156 33,831,528 2.48623 82,604 Snoqualmie 103,807,386 18,335,068 1,818,761 746,970,189 2.64215 1,971,519 Tukwila 15,567 520,081 4,706 85,893,574 1.33152 114,150 Yarrow Point $3,167,956,119 $1,000,828,930 $67,389,298 $38,734,201,414 $106,056,208 TOTAL-Cities&Towns ROAD DISTRICT $ 772,198,921 $ 711,550,202 $18,209,870 $18,068,985,333 $1.3176955 $ 23,684,886 Road District Fund 772,198,921 711,550,202 18,209,870 18,068,985,333 .1355145 2,438,690 Current Expenditures $ 772,198,921 $ 711,550,202 $18,209,870 $18,068,985,333 $ 1.45321 $ 26,123,576 TOTAL-Road District - RURAL LIBRARY $ 120,350,405 $ 60,620,839 $ 995,111 $ 2,369,261,397 $ .02218 $ 52,093 Library-Incorporated 772,198,921 711,550,202 18,209,870 18,068,985,333 .52218 9,383,776 Library-Unincorporated $ 772,198,921 $ 711,550,202 $18,209,870 $18,068,985,333 $ 9,435,869 TOTAL-Rural Library t Boats, Class II, included in this column. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES CITIES, TOWNS, ROAD AND LIBRARY REAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value' Assessed Value Assessed Value TOTAL State Public Omitted Land Buildings Land & Buildings Service-Real Assessments Seattle $ 8,203,312,728 $11,595,578,278 $19,798,891,006 $162,780,758 $1,265,800 Algona 17,858,350 16,013,800 33,872,150 337,091 - - Auburn 306,799,040 571,438,329 878,237,369 6,553,211 - Beaux Arts 5,964,500 7,391,900 13,356,400 - - - - Bellevue-1 784,698,970 1,084,675,241 1,869,374,211 48,466,446 Bellevue-4 220,882,040 359,845,632 580,727,672 2,773,599 216,100 Bellevue-5 595,879,260 1,135,469,850 1,731,349,110 4,164,400 21,800 Bellevue-6 28,428,200 44,855,800 73,284,000 88,999 - Bellevue-7 1,468,800 3,431,500 4,900,300 9,732 - - Black Diamond 12,133,405 11,961,724 24,095,129 407,089 - - Bothell 94,978,100 138,722,000 233,700,100 497,283 75,300 Carnation 6,306,400 13,076,869 19,383,269 78,359 - - Clyde Hill 77,749,600 108,853,000 186,602,600 - - - - Des Moines 122,095,100 241,204,099 363,299,199 2,048,036 347,200 Duvall 11,045,300 16,091,903 27,137,203 17,046 - - Enumclaw 56,996,550 107,508,300 164,504,850 356,839 75,300 Hunts Point 54,863,200 31,677,300 86,540,500 - - - - Issaquah 106,336,900 146,234,499 252,571,399 1,701,812 103,000 14 Kent 562,970,670 932,970,124 1,495,940,794 16,409,240 87,700 Kirkland-1 164,414,800 251,632,900 416,047,700 1,959,664 -Kirkland-3 99,781,980 137,180,600 236,962,580 2,216,805 - - Kirkland-4 113,712,800 167,521,454 281,234,254 128,585 - - Lake Forest Park-1 24,044,000 36,759,000 60,803,000 - - - - Lake Forest Park-2 7,715,900 17,376,100 25,092,000 - - Medina 155,797,950 115,912,242 271,710,192 195,279 47,500 Mercer Island 492,314,650 648,203,899 1,140,518,549 1,270,354 141,800 Milton 3,827,600 5,951,300 9,778,900 4,690 - - Normandy Park 106,639,800 139,287,400 245,927,200 - - - - North Bend 17,200,033 33,298,000 50,498,033 398,216 - - Pacific 23,236,900 32,840,200 56,077,100 416,715 - - Redmond 604,533,143 819,048,800 1,423,581,943 16,015,060 - - Renton 475,676,880 920,229,121 1,395,906,001 25,387,173 7,051,700 Skykomish 1,642,200 3,432,800 5,075,000 366,646 - - Snoqualmie 8,778,300 17,813,800 26,592,100 1,320,333 290,400 Tukwila 160,621,190 459,961,200 620,582,390 2,426,584 - - Yarrow Point 44,655,520 40,697,700 85,353,220 - - - - TOTAL-Cities &Towns $13,775,360,759 $20,414,146,664 $34,189,507,423 $298,796,044 $9,723,600 ROAD DISTRICT - Rum; Dist'iui Fund $ 6,639,126,985 $ Q 979 203 290 S1R 517330,275 $ 45.683,965 S4.017100 Current Expense Fund 6,639,126,985 9,878,203,290 16,517,330,275 45,683,965 4,012,100 TOTAL-Road District $ 6,639,126,985 $ 9,878,203,290 $16,517,330,275 $ 45,683,965 $4,012,100 RURAL LIBRARY Library-Incorporated $ 891,536,068 $ 1,280,300,950 $ 2,171,837,018 $ 15,458,024 $ - - Library-Unincorporated 6,639,126,985 9,878,203,290 16,517,330,275 45,683,965 4,012,100 TOTAL-Rural Library $ 7,530,663,053 $11,158,504,240 $18,689,167,293 $ 61,141,989 $4,012,100 'Levies for omitted assessments vary with each year. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES PERSONAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Total Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value State Public Assessed Value State Public Omitted" Assessed Value Personal Property Service Boats Service-Boats Assessments TOTAL $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - - $20,759,206,753 Land - - - - - - - - - - 30,305,846,654 Improvements 3,940,155,04 1,712,379,132 243,413,813 6,704,761 163,992,755 6,066,645,501 Personal Property $3,940,155,040 $1,712,379,132 $243,413,813 $6,704,761 $163,992,755 $57,131,698,908 TOTAL $3,940,155,040 $1,712,379,132 $243,413,813 $6,704,761 $163,992,755 $57,131,698,908 State 3,940,155,046 1,712,379,132 - - - - 85,599,168 56,803,186,747 County 3,940,155,040 1,712,379,132 - - - - 85,599,168 56,803,186,747 Port TAXES STATE, COUNTY AND PORT DISTRICTS Personal Property State Public Local Boat State Public Services Omitted t TOTAL Taxes Service Taxes Taxes Boat Taxes Assessment Taxes TAXES STATE OF WASHINGTON $13,905,264 $6,063,124 $861,869 $23,740 $533,290 $200,977,050 School Fund 13 KING COUNTY $ 4,313,758 $1,880,931 - - - - $ 06,226 $61,994,405 Current Expense 111,045 48,419 - - - - 2,737 1,596,462 River Improvement 29,123 12,699 - - - - 593 418,558 Soldiers Relief 64,689 28,206 - - - - 1,317 929,682 Mental Health 3,488 1,512 - - - - 80 49,856 Inter-County River Improvement 151,262 65,955 - - - - 3,962 2,174,909 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds 187,322 81,678 - - - - 3,750 2,691,916 Conservation Futures 58,140 25,351 - - - - - - 834,200 Conservation Futures C.I.P. - - - - - - - - 40 52 Refund Fund $ 4,918,807 $2,144,751 $ - - $ - - $ 98,705 $70,690,040 TOTAL(Within Statutory Limits) 1,231,061 537,719 - - - - 28,793 17,503,918 G.O.Bond-Voter Approved $ 6,149,868 $2,682,470 $ - - $ - - $127,498 $88,193,958 TOTAL COUNTY $ 563,435 $ 246,104 $ - - $ - - $ 11,499 $ 8,009,253 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE PORT OF SEATTLE $ 1,306,583 $ 569,710 $ - - $ - - $ 25,712 $18,776,879 General Fund - - - - - - - - 13 17 Refund Fund 177,349 77,330 - - - - 4,426 2,549,721 Bond Redemption $ 1,483,932 $ 647,040 $ - - $ - - $ 30,151 $21,326,617 TOTAL PORT 'Boats, Class II,included in this column ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES STATE, COUNTY REAL PROPERTY AND PORT DISTRICT Assessed Value Assessed Valuet Assssed Value State Public Omitted Real Property Service Assessments Land $20,414,487,744 $344,480,009 $ 239,000 Improvements 30,292,349,954 — — 13,496,700 Personal Property — — — — — — TOTAL $50,706,837,698 $344,480,009 $13,735,700 State $50,706,837,698 $344,480,009 $13,735,700 County 50,706,837,698 344,480,009 13,735,700 Port 50,706,837,698 344,480,009 13,735,700 TAXES STATE, COUNTY AND PORT DISTRICTS Total Assessed Real Property State Pubic Omitted t Value Levy Rate Taxes Service Taxes Assessments Taxes STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 2 School Fund $57,131,698,908 $ 3.54076 $178,327,136 $1,219,721 $42,906 KING COUNTY Current Expense $56,803,186,747 $1.0984266 $ 55,321,505 $ 378,388 $13,597 River Improvement 56,803,186,747 .0282780 1,424,089 9,740 432 Soldiers Relief 56,803,186,747 .0074135 373,495 2,555 93 Mental Health 56,803,186,747 .0164743 829,589 5,674 207 Inter-County River Improvement 56,803,186,747 .0008857 44,478 305 13 Limited Tax G.O.Bonds 56,803,186,747 .0385151 1,939,853 13,268 609 Conservation Futures 56,784,864,303 .0477003 2,402,303 16,432 431 Conservation Futures C.I.P. 56,703,851,879 .0148065 745,610 5,099 — — Refund Fund 18,322,444 — — — — — — 12 TOTAL Within Statutory Limits) $56,803,186,747 $ 1.25250 $ 63,080,922 $ 431,461 $15,394 G.O.Bonds-Voter Approved $56,803,186,747 .31402 15,593,524 108,173 4,648 TOTAL COUNTY $56,803,186,747 $ 1.56652 $ 78,674,446 $ 539,634 $20,042 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES $56,803,186,747 $ .14372 $ 7,136,894 $ 49,509 $ 1,812 PORT OF SEATTLE General Fund $56,803,186,747 $ .33270 $16,756,179 $ 114,609 $ 4,086 Refund Fund 18,322,444 — — — — — — 4 Bond Redemption 56,803,186,747 .04516 2,274,399 15,556 661 TOTAL PORT $56,803,186,747 $ .37786 $ 19,030,578 $ 130,165 $ 4,751 t Levies for omitted assessments vary depending upon year of omission. TAXES PAYABLE IN 1985 ARE CALCULATED ON 1984 VALUES. 1985 TAXES Maximum Taxes Voter Approved Number Allowed Under Allowed Taxes Taxes for the of Statutory Limits (Outside Statutory Redemption of Taxing Without Voter Limits)Without Bonded Indebtedness Levying Agency Bodies Approval Voter Approval and Special Levies t Total Levies State 1 $200,977,050 $ — — $ — — $200,977,050 County 1 70,690,040 — — 17,503,918 88,193,958 Port District 1 — — 21,326,617* — — 21,326,617 Road District 1 26,123,576 26,123,576 Municipalities 29 82,226,300 387,521 ** 23,442,387 106,056,208 School Districts 21 — — — — 138,464,790 138,464,790 Fire Districts 34 17,263,776 — — 3,573,849 20,837,625 11 Water Districts 39 — — — — 3,01 2 3,012 Sewer Districts 17 — — Rural Library 1 8,988,932 — — 446,937 9,435,869 County Airport 1 — — — Hospital Districts 3 2,973,252 — — 2,267,220 5,240,472 Park and Recreation Districts 3 Flood Control Zones 10 Air Pollution District 1 Metro 1 - - - - - - - - Cemetery District 1 27,000 — 27,000 Emergency Medical Services 1 — — — — 8,009,253 8,009,253 TOTAL 166 $409,269,926 $21,714,138 $193,711,366 $624,695,430 *Provided by Constitutional exclusion. "LID.Guarantee Fund IRCW 35.54.060) t The Constitution provides for taxing districts to raise additional funds upon approval by the voters of the districts(law requires favorable majority of 60%of 40%of the number of votes cast in the last previous general election). DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS 1966 THROUGH 1985 Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed INCREASE Tax Value Value Value Value Value or Year Land % Improvements % State Pub.Serv. % Personal % ALL DECREASE 1966. . $ 462,250,780 27.56 $ 806,876,350 48.12 $ 93,216,505 5.55 $ 314,591,271 18.77 $ 1,676,934,906 $ 54,971,289 1967. . 493,649,395 26.67 860,288,950 46.47 95,531,428 5.16 401.635,290 21.70 1,851,105,063 174,170,157 1968. . 528,495,261 26.22 936,459,499 46.47 93,944,631 4.66 456,225,275 22.65 2,015,124,666 164,019,603 1969. . 575,816,750 25.25 1,044,571,780 45.80 103,581,280 4.54 556,860,017 24.41 2,280,829,827 265,705,161 1970. . 623,170,488 25.05 1,133,292,098 45.56 112,051,603 4.51 618,859,325 24.88 2,487,373,514 206,543,687 1971•. . 1,356,050,320 25.67 2,483,914,152 47.01 251,604,684 4.76 1,191,771,275 22.56 5,283,340,431 2,795,966,917 27 1972. . 1,454,347.126• 26.81 2,528,786,027• 46.62 242,435.483•• 4.47 1,198,786,325t 22.10 5,424,354,961 141,014,930 1973. . 1,915,840,018• 30.57 3,093,909,141• 49.37 320,308,202•• 5.11 936,463,320t 14.95 6,266,520,681 842,165,720 1974. . 2,306,312,158* 31.83 3,526,539,747* 48.66 370,100,854•• 5.11 1,043,709,310t 14.40 7,246,662,069 980,141,388 1975. . 4,556,585,580• 30.04 7,557,637,084* 49.83 769,027,933*" 5,07 2,284,254,050t 15.06 15,167,504,647 7,920,842,578 1976. . 4,618,993,488• 27.65 8,551,406,267* 51.18 828,827,010`• 4.96 2,708,485,118t 16.21 16,707,711,883 1,540,207,236 1977. . 4,874,959,564• 27.08 9,251,379,620• 51.39 947,889,542"• 5.26 2,929,542,062t 16.27 18,003,770,788 1,296,058,905 1978. . 5,490,088,538* 26.64 10,885,320,630* 52.82 1,009,715,138•* 4.90 3,223,877,951 t 15.64 20,609,002,257 2,605,231,469 1979. . 5,534,540,060* 25.17 11,776,058,349* 53.54 1,108,584,892"• 5.04 3,574,682,670t 16.25 21,993,865,971 1,384,863,714 1980. . 5,907,591,805* 23.96 13,219,999,510" 53.62 1,214,545,922"• 4.93 4,311,016,410t 17.49 24,653,153,647 2,659,287,676 1981. . 13,006,655,888* 28.60 25,626,363.863* 56.36 1,409,164,399*" 3.10 5,429,291,310t 11.94 45,471,475,460 20,818,321,813 1982. . 13,034,989,762• 27.18 26,808,087,878* 55.91 1,624,614,181*• 3.39 6,483,149,030t 13.52 47,950,840,851 2,479,365,391 1983. . 18,866,199,234• 33.39 28,562,396,325* 50.54 1,779,739,763*• 3.15 7,300,262,962t 12.92 56,508,598,284 8,557,757,433 1984. . 18,894,168,685• 34.84 29,502,850,081• 54.41 1,895,578,716"• 3.50 3,932,330,467t 7.25 54,224,927,949 -2,283,670,335 1985. . 20,414,726,744• 35.73 30,30b,846,654* 53.05 2,063,563,902"" 3.61 4,347,561,608 7.61 57,131,698,908 2,906,770,959 • Includes Omitted Assessments •"Includes Boats t Includes Boats and Omitted Assessments PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF OF OF PROPERTY TAXES PROPERTY TAXES PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED IN LEVIED IN LEVIED IN KING COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES UNINCORPORATED AREAS I 0/0 30.54% 22.16% STATE/o 2 1.14% STATE 24.16 % STATE LOCAL SCHOOL LOCAL SCHOOL LOCAL 0.62% SCHOOL SUPPORT 0.10% SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL SUPPORT HOSPITAL SUPPORT FIRE SUPPORT SUPPORT o 3.4 I% SUPPORT 4.18% 4.42 /o PORT � ROAD7 LIBRARY "110 9RE 0 1.32% 25.71 % FIRE 13.25 16.98% 14.12 /o MUNICIPAL 14.56% 0 12.31% COUNTY 28 3.34% MUNICIPAL COUNTY 1.51% MEDICALCY COUNTY 3.52PORT ROAD 1.21% FIRE LIBRARY SERVICES 3.20% EMERGENCY 0.84% PORTMEDICAL I.28% HOSPITAL SERVICES EMERGENCY 0.01% 0.02% 1.26% 0.01% MEDICAL WATER,CEMETERY, WATER,LIBRARY HOSPITAL WATER,CEMETERY, SERVICES SEWER,FLOOD ZONES SEWER,FLOOD ZONES SEWER,FLOOD ZONES Tax Dollars Tax Dollars Tax Dollars State School Support $200,977,050 Municipal $106,056,208 State School Support $ 64,794,305 Municipal 106,056,208 State School Support 136,182,745 Local School Support 51,259,822 Local School Support 138,464,790 Local School Support 87,204,968 King County 28,104,928 King County 88,193,958 King County 60,089,030 Road 26,1 23,576 Road 26,123,576 Emergency Medical Services 5,451,500 Emergency Medical Services 2 557,753 Port 21,326,617 Port 14,533,952 Port 6 792,665 Emergency Medical Services 8,009,253 Hospital 2 561,545 Hospital 2 678,927 Fire 20,837,625 Water 2 937 Water 75 Library 9 435,869 Fire 392,419 Fire 20,445,206 Hospital 5 240,472 Sewer — — Sewer — — Water 3 012 Library 52,093 Library 9 383,776 Cemetery 27,000 Flood Zone Cemetery 27,000 Sewer — TOTAL $412,527,397 Flood Zone — — Flood Zone — TOTAL $212,168,033 TOTAL $624,695,430 Computer Assisted Information Services For a number of years the Department of Assessments has been develop- ing modern computer assisted information and data systems to facilitate storage, access and analysis necessary to value and equalize the almost 600,000 real and personal property parcels and accounts in King County. In March, 1985 the computer systems used in the valuation of residential property were converted to a modern Data Base System, providing on- line access to much property data.The on-line system provides faster ac- cess to more up-to-date real property information for Department and public use. In conjunction with this, much of the microfiche system for taxpayer in- formation has been phased out, and computer terminals installed in the Public Information Area (room 700A) for taxpayer use. Taxpayers may now use self-service terminals or receive assistance from a readily available staff. Automated Systems in Personal Property AREPORT ON PROGRESS The Personal Property Division also, in recent years, initiated computer assisted procedures to improve its efficiency. One example is the printing of taxpayer asset costs on Personal Property Affidavits. The taxpayer need only show changes which have occurred in the prior year rather than relisting all cost data each year. Other enhancements allow faster processing of affidavits once they are 29 received by the Assessor. This in turn provides more time for staff to go into the field to meet with taxpayers to resolve specific problems and to assess newly established businesses. Improved communication with the business community continues to be an important goal of the Personal Property Division. Appraisal Mapping Improvements and Information The Accounting Division carried out a coordinated series of special proj- ects to update and improve appraisal mapping and information to the public. A COMPREHENSIVE ZONING UPDATE involved obtaining current zoning information from all jurisdictions and updating over 2,000 maps and af- fected parcels. In an UPDATE OF APPRAISAL BOUNDARIES, a major redrawing of our residential appraisal areas was accomplished. This involved over 1,170 maps and all records for the individual parcels affected. In another project involving updating 1,200 maps, boundaries of DESIGNATED WETLANDS were identified on our quarter section overlays. Square footage of wetland and non-wetland area was added to parcels bisected by the wetland boundaries. A concentrated effort was made also in several commercial/industrial areas to compute and record SQUARE FOOTAGE LAND AREA on our master maps. Finally, as part of a long range project to reduce appraisal volume, con- Administration and Personnel Development siderable effort was spent to MERGE ADJACENT PROPERTIES of like The Department of Assessments consists of four major divisions, with ownership. supporting administrative staff, and totaling 255 full time positions. The Micro Computer for Commercial Appraisal present staff level is the same as that of 1984. The Department purchased a micro computer for the Commercial Section AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT remain corn- to assist in the appraisal process.This will enable us to expedite and refine erstones of the Assessor's personnel policies. Career advancement and our sales analysis,income capitalization and building replacement cost ap- morale of the Department's staff is in part dependent upon ongoing train- praisal techniques. ing and promotional opportunities they receive. Progress in both affirm- Appraiser Training ative action and employee advancement continued during 1984. Employment of minorities in the Department of Assessments increased Training has been in the forefront in 1984/1985 in the Appraisal Division. 12.7%in 1984.Twenty-six current employees received promotions dur- The Assessor has initiated a program designed to encourage appraisal ing the year, and the budget for staff training was more than tripled in professionalism through mutual commitment of the appraisers and the 1985. Plans call for the Assessor to continue to increase the quality and Department of Assessments. The Department will provide the opportun- efficiency of both the staff and the Deparment through training and pro- ity to complete the International Association of Assessing Officers' motion opportunities, and by reaching out to all communities in courses as part of the requirements for Certified Assessment recruitment. Evaluator/Residential Evaluation Specialist designations. Appraisers, in turn, will be encouraged to make the personal commitment of time and A special committee, representing all levels and segments of the staff energy necessary to complete the other requirements needed for profes from division managers to clerks,reviewed the Department's PERFORM- sional designation. ANCE APPRAISAL/MERIT AWARD SYSTEM and recommended changes that will result in a comprehensive overhaul of the procedures, County-wide Land Revalue standards and criteria used to evaluate employees. We are putting many Land forms the basis for all real property valuation.This year the Depart- of their excellent recommendations into effect. Here again the key to suc- ment will complete a revalue and equalization of all land in King county. cess and improved morale was providing an environment in which This will be the first such comprehensive review in ten years.We will con- management and staff, working cooperatively together, could identify 30 tinue this function on at least a biennial basis. problems and jointly develop solutions. Finally, this past year the employees of the Department of Assessments completed their most successful ever UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN, pledg- ing $14,118 or 130% of our goal and 40% more than last year. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR OFFICE RUTHE RIDDER MJ.ANAG SMIT HER / ADMIN. ADMIN. ASSISTANT SERVICES R. GOLD CHIEF DEPUTY M.FRAWLEY ASSESSOR QUALITY Y BERNARD RYAN PUORMAT D.TOMLAN J.McCABE PROGRAM PLANNING ACCOUNTING PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION JOAN YOUNG S.T. SCHREINER KEN MORSE LORAN CLARK / I 1 I SYSTEMS S SALES CONTROL AA T SUPPORT SUPPORT APPRAISAL L RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL D. SUPPORT ANALYSIS UAST GROUP AA VANDEPUTTE MARTIN Mc NSN M.SLABAUGN J.MILLER TRENDS ASSESSED VALUE - NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENTS STAFFING LEVEL ($ MILLIONS) 1600- 1496.E 1549.7 300 - 1400 - 275 - 1200 - 1190.8 1139.6 264 254 258 255 255 I OOO - L. 998.4 250 - 800 - 600 - 225 - 400 - 200 5 200 - 0 L_ LI F F 0 _ 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 31 TAXES BILLED ASSESSED VALUE ($ MILLIONS) ($ BILLIONS) 700 - 60 - 56.469 57.131 54.224 624.6 600 - 558.0 50 - 47.951 547.7 45.472 500 - 40 - 460.8 418.5 400 - 30 - 500 20 - 0 L 4 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNTS PERSONAL PROPERTY ACCOUNTS ASSESSMENT YEAR 1984 ASSESSMENT YEAR 1984 Account Type No.Of Accounts Assessed Value Account Type No. of Accounts Assessed Value Single Family Residential 387,745 $30,551,438,833 Commercial 44,569 $3,314,023,125 Multiple Family Residential 1 7,335 4,028,348,390 Leased Equipment 1 7,098 337,337,456 Manufacturing 1,546 1,505,1 87,600 Mobile Home 15,697 281,757,580 Commercial 19,039 10,559,051,822 Floating Property 530 23,067,227 Agricultural Not In 24 7,564,000 Commercial Watercraft 2,219 321,807,400 "Current Use" Agricultural, Forest Lands, 1,645 48,378,063 State Public Service 2,213 1,719,083,893 Reforestation, Open Space & Timberland In Improvements on Leased 243 68,089,580 "Current Use" Public Land Other Real Property 109,734 4,365,084,699 Timber 3 1,479,240 TOTAL 537,068 $51,065,053,407 TOTAL 82,572 $6,066,645,501 32 REAL PROPERTY PERSONAL PROPERTY ACCOUNTS REVALUED ACCOUNTS REVALUED (IN THOUSANDS) (IN THOUSANDS) 82.6 550 - 537.1 80 — 533.8 73.0 516.5 71 7 72.5 500 - 70 - 67.1 ::: - 60 —5 50 80/81 82/83 84/85 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 TAX ROLL TAX ROLL TAX ROLL TAX ROLL TAX ROLL 1984 / 1985 REAL PROPERTY REVALUE IN PARCELS /ACCOUNTS RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL 10,227 (11.6%) 111,632 DECREASED (25.7%) DECREASED 40,807 19,950 302,142 37,090 °(46.3°/ ) (4.6%) (69.7%) (42.I%) UNCHANGED INCREASED III UNCHANGED INCREASED AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE CHANGE APPEALS FILED 33 - 108.4 _ 15,000 - 100%- n RESIDENTIAL n RESIDENTIAL 90 - IICOMMERCIAL 13,000 - ■ COMMERCIAL 80 - 1 I ,000 - 9,422 * PROJECTED 70 - 65.4 I13,43• 9,000 - 60 - 50 - 7,000 - 1,878 40 - 31.8 5,000 - 30 - 14.9 5,599 20 - 12.3 3,000 - I O - Ail I ,000 2,320� 209 I,I29 858 �"�� 800 0 H K.C. WA. K.C. WA. K.C. WA. 1980 1982 1984 EQUAL BD.OFBD.OFBD O BD.OF BDT OF EQUAL. TAX EQUAL. TAX EQUAL. TAX APPEALS APPEALS APPEALS 1980 1982 1984 KING COUNTY REAL ESTATE SALES (1 % EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVITS FILED) The volume of real estate sales increased slightly in 1984. Real estate prices show no systematic declines or increases during the year. (000) 65 - 64,315 61,609 60 - 34 55 - 50 _ 49,338 46,197 46,547 45 - 42,098 IL 40 - 37,410 35 0 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Procedures and Timeliness are controlled by Washington State Law, Department of Revenue Directives and Department of Assessments Policies. All property (other than new construction and mobile homes subject to their first assessment) is subject to assessment and taxation on the first day of January in each year. (RCW 84.36.005 and RCW 84.40.020) Preliminary Assessment Work by Assessor to Begin not later than December 1, for collections in the second year following. (RCW 84.40.040) Lien of Taxes: Real Property — The taxes assessed upon real property and mobile homes shall be a lien thereon from and including the first day of January in the year in which they are levied. (RCW 84.60.020) IMPORTANT DATES Persona/Property — The taxes assessed upon personal property shall be a lien thereon from and after the date upon which such property is RELATING TO listed and valued by the County Assessor. (RCW 84.60.020) 35 PROPERTY ASSESSMENTvA Taxes Payable to King County Finance Director on or after February 15 AND TAXATION —based on assessed values and tax levies of the preceeding year. First half taxes due by April 30.Second half taxes become delinquent after October 31.When total taxes are $10.00 or less,entire amount must be paid by April 30. (RCW 84.56.020) Taxing District Boundary Changes resulting from annexations, mergers, incorporations, etc., must be certified by the King County Council to the King County Assessor by March 1 for proper assignment of assessed values in the current assessment year. (RCW 84.09.030) Personal Property — Filing of Affadavit Refer to pages 1 and 3 for definitions of Personal Property,determination of value and affidavit procedure. Deadline for filing of affidavits without penalty is March 31 of the assessment year. (RCW 84.40.040) Assessment Roll Listing — Real and Personal Properties to be corn- Certification of state property tax levy to the County Assessor:Within pleted by County Assessor on or before May 31, except for new con- three days after receipt of the proceedings of the State Board of struction.(RCW 84.40.040) Equalization. (RCW 84.48.110) June Meeting of County Board of Equalization: errors in description, Equalized assessed value of public utility property certified to the double assessments, etc., submitted by the County Finance Director. County Assessor by the Department of Revenue upon receipt from the (RCW 84.56.400) State Board of Equalization(normally in September).(RCW 84.12.370) Assessment Roll Certified by County Assessor to County Board of Equalization: First Monday in July. (RCW 84.40.320) Assessor Certifies Assessed Value to Taxing Districts: After receipt and distribution of public utility and private car company values from County Board of Equalization Convenes for not less than three days Department of Revenue — usually by September 20. (RCW nor more than four weeks, beginning the first Monday in July. (RCW 84.48.130) 84.48.010) Budgets Filed with Clerk of County Council: By first class cities under Taxpayer Appeals Protesting Assessed Valuation of Real Property to 300,000 population, second and third class cities, port districts and be filed with County Board of Equalization by July 15. Review page 6 first class school districts, etc., on or before the Wednesday next 36 for appeals procedure and available assistance. (WAC 458.14.120) following first Monday in October. (RCW 84.52.020) Assessment Roll Listing: New construction listing to be completed by Levies Certified to County Assessor: By County Council, City Councils county Assessor on or before August 31. (RCW 36.21.080) of first class cities having more than 300,000 population, (fourth class towns and other taxing districts having authority to levy taxes Appeals from County Board of Equalization: If a taxpayer wishes to directly), on or before second Monday in October. (RCW 84.52.070) appeal a decision of the County Board, he or she may appeal for review by the State Board of Tax Appeals. Taxpayer appeals must be November Meeting of County Board of Equalization: Errors in descrip- filed with the Clerk of the County Council within thirty days of County tion, double assessments, etc., submitted by Assessor third Monday Board action. (RCW 84.08.130) in November. (RCW 84.52.090) Department of Revenue shall equalize taxes authorized by law during Assessor Certifies Tax Rolls to County Finance Director: On or before the month of August. (RCW 84.48.080) December 15. (Copy to county Auditor). (RCW 84.52.080) Certification of Public Utility and Private Car Company Valuations: To Abstract of Tax Rolls to State Auditor by County Assessor: On or County Assessors by the State Department of Revenue after deter before January 15, 1984. (RCW 84.48.050) mination by the State Board of Equalization. (RCW 84.16.130) HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF THE PROPERTY TAX IN WASHINGTON STATE Early History - 1853: U.S. Organic Act established territorial govern- 1965 - 47th Amendment to the state constitution, allowing for ment; all taxes to be assessed uniformly; exemption for property of senior citizen property exemption. the United States and for churches and benevolent institutions. 1886: Revenue producing property of churches is taxable. 1889: 1967 - Senior citizens exempt from first $50.00 of real property State Constitution adopted — property to be assessed at 50% of tax. Barlow vs. Kinnear provided the state with assessment equalize- true and fair value, (Legislature may grant exemptions). 1900: $300 tion power. of personal property per household exempt. 1925: Exemptions for private schools and colleges. 1968 - 53rd Amendment to the state constitution provided current use assessment for open space, timber and agricultural land. 1929 - 14th Amendment to the state constitution; classification of property is allowed with all real estate being one class; all taxes to be 1969 - State sponsored revaluation plan instituted to make the uniform upon the same class of property within the boundaries of the 1955 revaluation act fully effective. Carkonen vs. Williams man- taxing authority levying the tax. dated a 50% assessment ratio (ratio of assessment value to market value). Yield tax on reforestation lands and on mines permitted, (effective 1931). 1970 - Open Space Law, (53rd Amendment to the state constitu- 37 tion), implemented. Leases of public land subject to assessment. 1931 - Intangibles exempt from the property tax. 1971 - $50.00 senior citizen exemption replaced by exemption 1932 - Initiative imposed a 40 mill limit on combined regular levies from special levies. ($4,000 and under income qualification for of all taxing districts with property assessed at 50% of value. 100% exemption; $4,000 to $6,000 income for 50% exemption). Annual increase in regular levies of local taxing districts limited to Redd Case limited state authority over local assessments. 6% over the largest regular levy of three previous years, (effective 1974 collections). Annual updating of property values permitted. 1935 - Revenue Act: exemption for all household goods and per- Standing timber exempt from the property tax and an excise tax bas- sonal effects. ed on stumpage value imposed to replace this revenue source. Ex- panded exemption for facilities of private schools. 1937 - On-highway motor vehicles exempt from property taxes. Ex- cise Tax (1.5% of value) on-highway motor vehicles adopted. Interest on delinquent property taxes: lowered from 10% to 5% per annum up to $500, 10% on balance; or, if first half paid timely, (by 1943 - House trailers exempt from the property tax and are made April 30th), and second half becomes delinquent, (after October subject to the 1.5% motor vehicles excise tax. 31st), interest rate is 10% per annum. 1944 - 17th Amendment added the 40 mill limit to the state con- 1972 - Residential improvements up to 30% of value exempt from stitution. property taxation for three years. Approval of SJR1 constitutionally limiting all regular levies to 1 % of property value, ($10.00 per 1955 - Property revaluation cycle established — 4 year interval. $1,000.00 of assessed value).Removal of 40%voter turnout require- ment for special levies — (60% majority requirement for approval 1961 - Freeport exemption for goods in transit granted. retained). 1973 -Assessment level increased from 50%to 100%of true and regular levies on the first$15,000 value of the residence. Regular fair value, for 1974 collection. SJR1 effective for 1974 taxes levy of $.25 per $1,000.00 assessed value authorized for (Hoppe vs. Kinnear): 20 mill maximum for regular levies, with no emergency medical services - (six year voter opproved regular state levy. Current use assessment of farm land based on net levy). cash rental value. Permanently affixed mobile homes exempt from excise tax and returned to the property tax. 1980 -Senior citizen exemption changes set:one-third exclusion for Social Security income eliminated, but qualifying income 1974 - Phase-out of property tax on inventories begun, (10% per levels increased by $3,000. Exemption for added value of year, accomplished thru annually increasing B &O tax credits), unconventional energy systems authorized (thru 1987) -also for complete phase-out by 1984. Eight percent delinquency rate gasohol manufacturing facilities. established. Fire district service charged approved - to be proportional to benefits conferred by the district; aggregate 1981 - Interest rate on delinquent property taxes, with exception charges limited to 60% of the district operating budget for the of senior citizen deferred taxes, increased °from 8% to 12%, year the charge is imposed, and must be approved by a 60% (effective 7/26/81). New penalty of 11 /o for first year majority of the districts voters. Special levy exemption for senior delinquencies, starting in 1982. Foreclosure period shortened from 5 years to 3 years, (effective May, 1983). Exemption for non- citizens increased; income qualificationso revised to: up to$5,000 profit musical and artistic organizations and public assembly - 100%exemption, $5,000 to$6,000-50/o exemption,up to$4,000 halls inaugurated. Valuation reduction approved for property - exempt from regular and special levies on first $5,000 of residence value. involved in natural disaster damage - no longer necessary to 38 make application. Levy allowed for park and recreation service 1975 - 100% assessment ratio implemented and statutory rate areas. limit reduced to $9.15 per $1,000 assessed value, (legislature set 1983 - Elimination of business inventories from property tax assess- maximum at $10.00 per 1,000 A.V.then in allocating the reduced ment rolls, effective in 1983 for 1984 collections. rate, cut maximum rates of certain district categories by an 1984 - Legal requirements for payment of penalties and interest on additional 10%). Deferral of property taxes and special delinquent taxes relaxed. Interest and penalties may now be paid on assessments allowed for senior citizens with income of less than "first half" taxes without affecting amount and due date of "2nd $8,000 - (income to be adjusted annually based on CPI). half" payments. 1976 - Approval of state constitutional amendment permitting school districts to seek voter approval of special levies for two Senior Citizen exemption qualifications modified: Households with years at the same election. $15,000 annual income or less exempt from all excess levies. Those with incomes of $12,000 or less exempt from all excess levies, plus 1977 - Court ordered phase in of special levy limitation and full $15,000 of the property assessed value exempt from all property taxes. state funding of basic education initiated - to be fully effective with 1981 levies. Senior citizen exemption qualifying income Qualification requirements for property tax deferral will be the same as levels increased by $2,000. Property tax exemption for solar for senior citizen/disabled persons tax exemption. energy facilities approved -expired upon adoption of exemption for added value of unconventional energy systems in 1980. 1985 - Senior Citizen exemption program expanded. Qualifying tax- payers in the $9,001 to $1 5,000 income range are exempt from all ex- 1979 -State levy for common schools placed under provisions of cess levies. In addition,those with annual incomes of less than $1 2,000 106% limitation law. Senior citizen exemption increased again: are exempt from all property tax on $20,000 or 30% of valuation households with income to $11,000 exempt from all special (whichever is greater);or if income is $9,000 or less, $25,000 or 50% levies; in addition, those with income to $7,000 exempt from of valuation, (whichever is greater), is exempt from all property tax. • j�`��_ • • , ,,, i r I ilk di, IIG MY PROPERTY YOUR PROPERTY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM • Hon. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor TO: Renton City Council Members DATE : 11/6/84 Michael Mulcahy, Finance Director FROM: Maxine Motor, City Clerk SUBJECT : King County Department of Assessments 1984 Annual Report Please note the attached letter from Ruthe Ridder, King County Assessor. The report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. If you wish to review the 1984 report, please advise. I • RUTHE RIDDER KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 708 King County Administration Building (*) 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104-2384 October 30, 1984 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Att: M. Motor , Clerk Dear M. Motor , Enclosed is the King County Department of Assessments 1984 Annual Report. I am pleased to be able to provide it for your use . The report contains a comprehensive set of tables covering assessed valuations and taxes pertinent to each of the 166 taxing districts in King County. Included are data summarizing the appraisal of over 530,000 commercial , industrial and residential properties , as well as nearly 70, 000 personal property accounts. The total assessed valuation of this taxable King County property , for the 1984 tax roll , is $54 . 2 billion dollars. In addition the report provides answers to many of the questions most frequently asked of the Assessor , as well as an overview of our recent progress and my priorities for the future . The 255 employees of the Department join me in hoping you find this report useful . If you have any questions or wish to make sugges- tions about this report or our programs and services, please call me in Seattle at 344-2630. Sincerely, .-XordeA-.. ;611W11,....‘ Ruthe Ridder King County Assessor RR:ea Enclosure O E Q 15 DYE n Nov 2. '4 i Li CITY CLERK .. a sv, lt. A-i-s,-..„4. ., „,,„ f +i f � � ,,...., a A ,,,, . -, ,,,,:. '14' 4.- ++''' —. .4.• * 11. . *ICING COUN 7. Y .�'.- • ; nDEPARTMENT + ' ' x B ENTS a 8 k's: ''' A '. ,.. e , ' 115' ' -, ,z," .. , , ...... .. ,.-....,.:.:21..,L. , �r �� `` "k- • 4 ?IP -• 4014 3 " �+. Al. r ♦ "'"� `► )11p1r.r:‘11111e A .. , • iil ` •':.. a'"s "-' .ems # r • f ' i 7-414.. - . .r. a` . . 444 •• I ,111114--",': ....'.., .., :Avs.:47',,,i, . .,,,,.;,. ,....,,, A . tot' ,11,A .•,,0 r• . . .• , 4 '1/4.„ ' 0 , t 4k,,. , :1 ,.,. , , ‘t'411. **.' Ikl:‘ .t: 4,,.::,..,r'' ' ., '. ± • ..-- .. iiiip �, , .f. ♦ rat.- ..t•o • k / , 4: t . 'S ler. T 4T , : ..* ak...... .• ,...it 4 • a• A , • �r� s�#` `t 1 lll�� v +1114 •• ,tom ' ' '.41' '44:4*."' f . loicook-W ...4 ..•-• . - - • . .., 4 . . 4,' --, _ . b . , t4ii. ..... PI° . ^lli- • 4164. KING N SS`ESSQR i. "{ 'N` - ~' ` . y, - c., r r V • a. r Cover: King County is outlined on an image of the Puget Sound region as viewed on May 22, 1983 by the Landsat 4 Satellite, or- biting at an altitude of 440 miles. A MESSAGE This year King County contains almost 600,000 properties and ac- counts worth more than 54 billion dollars. The task of appraising the from the value of this real and personal property is complex and difficult. Our goal, in all of this, is fairness. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR In this, my first annual message to you as your King County Assessor, I want to report our progress to date and some of my priorities for the future. High on that list are a series of initiatives and changes that will make the Department of Assessments more accessible,understandable and responsive to the citizens of King County, while increasing the effi- ciency of the Department and making it a better place to work. A newly instituted Community Education Program will feature, as of this year,a series of Taxpayer Assistance Meetings held throughout the county at times and places convenient to working people, especially where taxpayers face increases in their property valuations. Our aim is to reach out to help citizens understand how the Department serves '• them, how we determine the value of their property, ,�_� p p rty, and how we can assist if they think the value set on their property is incorrect. Services available at the Public Information Counter also have been in- ,• creased. Taxpayers who may want to question or appeal a property ,, valuation now can get copies of the comparable sales data used by the Department to determine property values in each area of the County. ' Still more improvements are due later this year, including a new system of on-line computer terminals to make it simpler, easier and faster for the public to get information. I have reduced salary and other expenses in my administrative office. The money saved is being reinvested in training for the Department's appraisers and support staff. This will enable them to do a better job for the taxpayer and increase career development opportunities in the Department — especially for women and minorities. Finally, I am establishing a blue ribbon Citizen Task Force to do a com- plete review of the organization and operations of the Assessor's Office. They will recommend changes that will promote easier access to public information, increase efficiency and cost-effectiveness, improve employee morale, foster better cooperation with local governmental units, and in general, enhance public confidence in the office. With members drawn from the commercial sector, civic organizations, academic institutions and local government, the Task Force will have the benefit of a wide array of expertise and perspectives. They will also have specific deadlines to assure that I can report their recommenda- tions long before next year's Annual Report. Ruthe Ridder King County Assessor Page TAX FACTS 1 What kind of property is taxable? 1 How is the value of Real Property determined? 1 How is the value of Personal Property determined? 3 What determines the amount of my property tax? 3 How are property tax rates(levies)established? 3 What are the statutory limitiations on property taxes? 3 What do all the notations on my tax statement mean? 4 How do I qualify for a property tax exemption' 5 What public owned property is exempt? 6 What other kinds of property are tax exempt for non profit organizations? 6 How do I question or appeal the value placed on my property by the Assessor? 6 How do I obtain other information and assistance? 6 TAX FIGURES 7 Comparison of School Taxes 1980-1984 8 1984 Taxes Payable 9 CONTENTS Assessed Valuations and Taxes State,County and Port Districts 10 Cities,Towns,Road and Library 12 School Districts 14 Water Districts 16 Fire Districts 18 Sewer Districts 20 Other Taxing Districts 21 Comparison of 1983 and 1984 Assessed Valuations and Taxes 22 Distribution of Taxes Billed Throughout King County 24 Distribution of Assessed Valuations 25 Percentage Distribution of the Property Tax Dollar 26 A Report on Progress 27 Market Trends 28 Important Dates Relating to Assessment and Taxation 30 Historical Summary of Property Taxes 32 Information/Assistance Phone Numbers 34 What kinds of property are taxable? Under Washington State law, two types of property can be assessed and taxed. The first type is real estate which is land. Also assessable are any im- provements (buildings, etc.) made to that land. The second type is personal property. As defined by law taxable per- sonal property includes agricultural machinery and equipment, manufacturer's, contractors's and logging machinery and equipment, office machinery and equipment, supplies and materials not held for TAX FACTS sale and which do not become an ingredient or component of an arti- cle being produced for sale. Furniture and fixtures in commercial use, leased equipment, certain leasehold improvements, franchises and The following most frequently asked easements of intra-county public utilities, lessee owned improvements questions and answers will provide an on public land, aircraft, motor vehicles and commercial vessels not overview of the Assessor's responsib%/- subject to excise tax are also assessed and taxed as personal property. ities and the basis for them. Further Mobile homes and floating homes are valued and assessed as real pro- details regarding the programs that carry perty but are billed as personal property. out these responsibilities are presented in the section entitled "A Report on Pro- All other items of personal property are taxable unless specifically ex- gress" on page 27, empt by law. Types of personal property which are presently exempt include livestock, inventories held for resale, specific intangible 1 property such as money, bonds, stocks or shares of private corpora- One very important fact should be tions, mortgages, notes, etc. and personal effects and household brought to your attention — The COUN- goods in actual use by the owner. TY ASSESSOR performs the role of an appraiser in placing a dollar value on your home or other property. The Assessor How Is the value of Real Property determined? does not establish the dollar amount of In Washington State, "assessment" for tax purposes means taxes required nor does she bill or collect establishing the full market value of your land and the improvements the taxes. thereon. This is the job of an "appraiser." Appraisal methods used in King County follow basic appraisal practices and procedures used by all appraisers in the profession. Three approaches may be utilized to determine real property value. They are: Cost: The reproduction or replacement cost new, less accrued depreciation. Market: The market sales comparison approach. Income: The income or capitalization of economic rents approach. All three techniques are applied, if appropriate, in appraising improved commercial and industrial properties.The cost and market approaches are the basis of appraisal of improved residential properties. The market comparison approach is most often used to determine the value of vacant land. Whenever the Assessor revalues your property, you will receive a "Valuation Change Notice." (See form on page 2.) KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 700A KING COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 TELEPHONE (206)344-7304 VALUATION CHANGE NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE REAL PROPERTY HEREON DESCRIBED HAS BEEN CHANGED. THE NEW THE FULL VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY VALUE INDICATED APPLIES TO TOTAL VALUE LAND IMPROVEMENTS TAXES PAYABLE IN OLD VALUE ► 80,000 35,000 45,000 0 000000-0000-00 Oi 1985 0 NEW VALUE 00 100,00 50,000 50,000 0 00100 NOTE THE PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AT ITS FULL VALUE LEVY-0647, ,F u LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAILING ADDRESS LOT 1 & 2 BLOCK 21 YOUR SUBDIVISION YOUR NAME S'/2 LOT 1 AND ALL LOT 2 YOUR ADDRESS 2 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REVALUATION OF YOUR PROPERTY, PLEASE CALL US AT 344-7304.ASSISTANCE ON TAX MATTERS IS ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE KING COUNTY TAX ADVISOR, KING COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-TELEPHONE(206)344-5202. QUALIFICA- TIONS FOR EXEMPTIONS AND OTHER IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION ARE LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE. THIS NOTICE IS NOT A TAX STATEMENT. A Valuation Change Notice, (sample above), is mailed to the property owner each time the property is revalued for tax purposes. 0 Taxes payable in 1985 are based on 1984 assessment values. 0 Identifies combination of taxing districts in which property is located. Used as basis for distribution of assessed value and tax 0 Assessed Value of property prior to revaluation. dollars to taxing districts. 0 If there are omitted assessments on the account, the message Q Assessed Value of property afer revaluation. in this box reads: "This notice reflects property value that was not included on the 1984 tax roll but will be included on the 0 Identification of property in Assessor's records 1985 tax toll." The box may contain other messages such as notice of the time and location of Taxpayer Assistance Meetings. How is the value of Personal Property The State Constitution provides for taxing property at 100 percent of determined? appraised market value, with the appraisal process being the respon- sibility of the Assessor. The taxing district levy rates are enacted by Most personal property assessments are based upon information pro- the State Legislature. All levies above these statutory limits must be vided by the taxpayer on personal property affidavits furnished by the approved by a vote of the people, except for those of Pnrt and Utility Assessor. The affidavits are mailed to taxpayers by January 1 each districts. year and must be returned to the assessor by March 11 . The assessor may arant an extension of filing time if one is requested by the tax- What are the statutory limitations on payer on or before March 31. Penalties for late filing will be applied property taxes? unless 1) an extension has been granted or 2) the taxpayer provides, Statutory limitations on property taxation are established by Article 7, in writing, a statement of reasonable cause for the late filing. Section 2 (17th Amendment) of the Washington State Constitution The assessor uses the information provided by the taxpayer to make a (RCW 84.52.050) which limits the total "regular" property tax levy determination of value,taking into consideration the age,the cost, and to a maximum of $10.00 per $1,000.00 of property valuation. This the type of property. Whenever personal property is valued, a notice "1 % of value" limit* is subject to additional reduction since the above of valuation is mailed to the taxpayer. statute also imposes a 10% cut on all regular taxing district rates ex- cept those of fire and library districts. Thus, the effective levy limit What determines the amount of my property tax? becomes $9.15 per $1,000 of assessed value as shown below. A simplified answer is the cost of state and local government. This in- Below are the maximum dollar rates available to taxing districts for eludes operating costs of schools, city and county government, and 1984. (RCW 84.52.043). other taxing districts like the Port of Seattle, libraries, hospitals, fire, water and sewer districts. A large part of our property tax dollar goes Incorporated Unincorporated to pay off bonds for capital costs, such as building schools and other Taxing District' Area Area public projects. How are property tax rates (levies) established? Co aunty $1 .80 $1.80 Certain provisions of the State Constitution, statutory levies set by the Road Districts — 2.25 Legislature, and excess levies approved by the voters combine to Cities and Towns 3.60 — make up the total property tax levy. The tax rate on your property is Fire Districts — .50 the figure resulting from dividing the dollar amount of each taxing Library — .50 district levy by the total value of property in that particular district and Subtotal 9.00 8.65 2 then combining the rates of the various districts in which your prop- Floating .15 .50 erty is located. The assessed value of your home multiplied by the combined rate produces a tax amount which is your fair share of the TOTAL $9.15 $9.15 total levy in your area. The King County Finance Director issues tax statements and taxes are paid to his office. Notes: 1 Existing levies of Port and Public Utility Districts are outside the $9.15 per The current statutory levy rates amount to a maximum of $9.15 for $1.0000 Assessed Value Limitation. each $1,000 of assessed property value. Distinction is made between 2 Prorated beween overlapping Hospital, Fire and Library Districts. incorporated and unincorporated areas, but the total rate of each is limited to $9.15/$1,000. The only exceptions to this are Port and RCW 84.55.010 further limits the "regular levy" of any taxing district Utility District levies which are outside the statutory limitation. by restricting the regular levy amount in any year to 106% of the largest such amount levied in the three most recent previous years, In addition to statutory levies,excess levies are approved by the voters plus an additional amount calculated by multiplying the assessed as a way of paying off bonds for capital costs, but most generally as a valuation of all new construction within the district by the previous way of providing supplemental funds for operating purposes. year's regular levy rate. The "106% limit" applies to taxing districts, not to individual properties. " Required levies which exceed the 1%limitation must be approved by the electorate of the districts making such "excess"or "special"levies. What do all the notations on my tax statement mean? SEE REVERSE SIDE 1984 REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT PROPERTY TAX KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON ACCOUNT NUMBER O `� State S CURRENT TAX DISTRIBUTION CURRENT TAX INFORMATION H000000-0000-00 chool Support 265.40 Land Value 25,000 O#\' Local School Support150.31Improvements 443 County 123.82 Less Exempt Value 55,000 O City 220.83 TAXABLE VALUE 80,000 O Road/Uninc. Levy Rate 10.00816 Port Fire 29.1 7 General Tax 800.65 0 Special Assessment 0 Q0 Sewer& or Water TOTAL CURRENT TAX 800.65 , BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON Library Omitted Taxes Other YOUR NAME Emergency Med Svc 11.12 YOUR ADDRESS Special Assessment TOTAL CURRENT TAX TOTAL CURRENT TAX 800.65 INCLUDING OMITS 800.65 OFirst half must be paid or post- marked by APRIL 30th or FULL ( DELINOUENT TAX INFORMATION ''+s TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT INTEREST AND PAYABLE with YEAR PENALTY TAX LOT BLOCK CODE SEC TWP RG °oANNUALINTEREST plus penalty (See Reverse Side) 0 1 & 2 21 0010 Second half tax becomes delin- quent after OCTOBER 31st. FULL AMOUNT MAY BE PAID APRIL 30th DELINQUENT TOTAL -TOTAL CURRENT AND DELINQUENTS 0 Identification of your property in Assessor's records. vices. The city levy of $2.76032 is made up of a basic $2.13831 for operations and the Firemen's Pension Fund, and $.62201 for 0 This area indicates the tax dollar breakdown showing the amount bonds. Listed as"Other" in the "Current Tax Distribution" section, distributed to each taxing district within which boundaries your pro- is the Hospital District levy; or, if on Vashon Island, the Cemetery perty lies. District levy. Q These figures represent the assessed (market)value placed on your 0 This is the amount of tax you will have to pay. It was arrived at by property by the Department of Assessments. multiplying the total "Levy Rate" (E) by the "Taxable Value" in e If you are a qualified senior citizen or disabled person in the category (C). $12,000 or less income cateogry, your assessed value exemption 0 Drainage district assessment (based on "benefit value" placed by (up to $20,000) appears here. the courts on acreage involved) and/or State Forest Fire Patrol 0 This figure represents the total of levy rates that various govern- assessment (based on a statutory "per acre" rate). mental units are charging this year to finance their operations. In the © Assessment for prior year or years, based on the assessed value Seattle area the total rate is 10.00816 per thousand dollars of and levy rate of the year, or years, involved. assessed value. The rate will be higher or lower in other county areas, depending on the amount each government unit levies. 0 The "legal description" of your property. For example, the Seattle total is made up of the following rates: O There are two "tear off" half-year bills attached to the 1984 $3.31752 for the State School Fund, $1.54780 for county opera- detailed statement shown above, to accommodate payment in tions, $.36460 for the Port of Seattle, $2.76032 for the city, two installments. $1.87888 for schools and $.13904 for Emergency Medical Ser- How do I qualify for a property tax exemption? If you are a senior citizen or disabled person RCW 84.36.381 grants property tax exemptions to qualified senior calendar year, any real or personal property placed upon the assess- citizens and disabled persons as follows: ment roll of that year is destroyed in whole or in part, the true cash value of such property shall be reduced for that year (in an equitable 1984 Exemptions amount as determined within turther provisions of the law). Income Range Levies Exempt If your land is not being used for its "highest and best use" $12,001 to $15,000 100% of excess levies. Chapter 84.34 RCW provides special consideration to owners of pro- $12,000 or less 100% of excess levies, plus perty wishing to have it assessed for taxation purposes on the basis of $20,000 of property assessed its present use, rather than its highest and best use. value, exempt from all property tax. This Open Space Act provides for current-use assessment of farm and agricultural land, timberland, and other open space land. Applications 1985 Exemptions for classification are made to the Assessor for farm and agricultural land and to the County legislative authority for other classifications. Income Range Levies Exempt Once land is classified,taxes are based on the current-use value of the $12,001 to $15,000 100% of excess levies. land rather than its highest and best use. The Assessor must maintain $ 9,001 to $12,000 100% of excess levies, plus the current-use value for as long as the property remains classified. At $20,000 or 30% of valuation the same time, a record of the market value of the property is kept. This value represents the value of the property if it were not classified. up to $40,000, whichever is The difference between the current-use value and the market value greater, exempt from all property becomes the basis for computing the amount of additional taxes, G tax. penalties and interest that may become payable upon a change of use $ 9,000 or less 100% of excess levies, plus up or removal from classification. to $25,000 or 50% of valua- tion, whichever is greater, ex- If you plan to make physical improvements to your property empt from all property tax. RCW 84.36.400 exempts from taxation any physical improvement to Inflation and the rising cost of living have created undue hardships for a single family dwelling for the three assessment years subsequent to the low income elderly and disabled homeowner. Exemption of a por- the completion of the improvement, up to 30% of the value of the tion of the property tax is of great benefit to these persons who wish original structure. Notice must be filed prior to completion of the im- to maintain their own homes. Property tax exemption for elderly or provement being made, on forms furnished by the Assessor. disabled persons with incomes of $15,000 a year or less were allow- ed for taxes payable in 1984 on a total property value of If you buy or sell real property $1,112,132,359. RCW 84.60.020 provides for proration of taxes on real property be- tween vendor and purchaser."When there is no express agreement as RCW 84.38.010 permits qualified Senior Citizen property owners to to payment of the taxes. . .due and payable in the calendar year of defer property tax payments on up to 80% of their equity in the pro- the sale or the contract to sell, the (seller) shall be liable for the same perty. Such deferred taxes become a lien on the property, payable proportion of such taxes as the part of the calendar year prior to the upon sale or inheritance. A declaration to defer taxes must be filed day of the sale or the contract to sell bears to the whole of such calen- with the King County Assessor no later than thirty days before the tax dar year, and the. . . purchaser shall be liable for the remainder of is due. such taxes and subsequent taxes." If you have suffered destruction of property EXAMPLE: If A sells a house to B on March 1st, 1984, A (the seller) pays two months of the 1984 tax, and B (the purchaser) pays 10 RCW 84.70.010 provides that if, on or before December 31 in any months of the 1984 tax. If you are a "private" owner of timbered land What other kinds of property are tax-exempt Pursuant to the 1971 Forest Tax Law, all timber on privately and for non-profit organizations? federally owned land is exempt from ad valorem taxation (property RCW84.36.030 through 84.36.060 allow exemptions of property tax). Timber is now subject to an excise tax paid at the time of harvest used for character building, benevolent, protective or rehabilitative and administered by the Department of Revenue. The timber excise social services, camp facilities, veterans and relief organizations, tax is collected by the state for distribution to local taxing districts. libraries, orphanages, day care centers, nursing homes and hospitals, Public timber, other than federal, which is sold after August 1, 1982 is schools and colleges, art, scientific and historical collections,fire com- subject to ad valorem taxation as personal property in addition to the panies, humane societies, musical and artistic associations, and excise tax. However, any property tax paid on this timber may be public assembly halls. RCW 84.36.350 allows for exemption of claimed as a credit against the excise tax. sheltered workshops for the handicapped. Forest land is still subject to the property tax under the 1971 Forest Exemption must be claimed annually and ceases upon cessation Tax Law. Land that has been either classified or designated under the of the exemption-qualifying use of the property. law is assessed in accordance with valuation schedules developed by the Department of Revenue. The Assessor must determine which lands qualify and must then grade the land according to forest land How do I question or appeal the value placed quality, accessibility and the topography of the tract. on my property? Land which has no higher and better use than growing and harvesting Don't hesitate to contact us. Call or write the Assessor's office, (Room timber may be classified as forest land by the Assessor. Land which is 700A, 344-7304), if you feel an error has been made in valuing your being used to grow and harvest timber but which is more valuable for property. If it appears an error may have been made, the Assessor can other uses, may be designated as forest land by the Assessor upon ap- conduct an Assessment Review within 60 days and, if indicated, ad- plication by the landowner.To qualify as either classified or designated just the assessed value of your property. You can appeal to the King forest land, a parcel must be at least 20 acres in size and must be County Board of Equalization by July 15 of the year before the tax is 6 devoted primarily to growing and harvesting forest products. Both due. If you don't agree with the County Board's decision, you can ap- classified and designated forest land may be subject to compensating peal to the State Board of Tax Appeals. You must file with the State tax if the use of the land is changed. Board within 30 days of the County Board's ruling. You must present proof that the Assessor has erred in the appraisal.The information you present to the Board should show the sales of comparable properties in your area. You should also submit other pertinent information that What public owned property is exempt? describes the difference between the Assessor's value and what you RCW 84.36.010 allows exemption of taxes to all publicly owned pro- believe to be the correct value. Assistance may be obtained from the perty, such as that of the Federal Government, State, County or City King County Property Tax Advisor, (344-5202). governments. How do I obtain other information and assistance? Is all church-owned property exempt? Anyone desiring information or having a question about the assess- ment of their property should call 344-7304 or write the Department RCW 84.36.020 allows exemption to church-owned property used of Assessments, Room 700A, King County Administration Building, for church purposes. Property must be used for such things as church, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104. parking, parsonage, convent, caretaker's residence, and the land used therewith cannot exceed an area of five acres. The Public Information unit of the Assessment Department, Room 700A, is open weekdays from 8:30 to 4:30 to the public for assess- ment information and research. A public service counter is staffed to assist you in securing property information you may be unable to locate on your own. In the event the information you desire is of a more technical and complicated nature, appraisers are available to assist you. See page 34 for other information/assistance phone numbers. The value of King County properties, as reported on the tax rolls, based at 100% of assessed value, has increased nearly nine-fold over the past 20 years. However, there was a four percent decrease in assessed valuation from 1983 to 1984, a dollar amount of $2,283,670,335, due mainly to the removal of business inventories from the tax base, commencing with the 1984 tax roll, (RCW 84.36.477). The total assessed valua- tion of taxable property, for the 1984 tax roll is TAX FIGURES $54,224,927,949. 7 The Appraisal Division of the Department of Assessments is responsible for appraising over 530,000 commercial, industrial and residential properties in King County. Real property valua- tion increased $997,449,073 or 2.1% over the prior year, for a total of $48,709,501,610. The Personal Property Division assessed nearly 70,000 separate accounts in 1984. Personal Property valuation decreased $3,281 ,119,408, or 37.3%, below the prior year, for a total of $5,515,426,339 for 1984. COMPARISON OF TAXES 1980-1984 TOTAL TAXES LEVIED IN 1984 INCREASED $10,311,679 (1.9%) OVER 1983. BELOW IS A FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF TOTAL TAXES LEVIED FOR SCHOOLS State School King County Fund School Districts Total %Change 1980 $114,302,179 $ 71,217,914 $185,520,093 — 16.5% 1981 134,157,399 82,119,456 216,276,855 + 16.6% 1982 148,346,008 93,975,586 242,321,493 + 12.0% 1983 165,730,596 138,096,227 303,826,823 + 25.4% 1984 178,955,453 119,036,971 297,992,424 — 1.9% As indicated by the charts below, local school support levies and state school fund levies take a substantial portion of the property tax dollar. 1980 1982 1984 8 $ 358,991,556 $ 460,859,021 $ 558,025,148 51.68% 52.58% 53.40% $185,520,093 1981 $242,321,594 1983 $297,992,424 $ 418,537,427 $ 547,713,469 CEE655 $303,826,823 1984 TAXES Maximum Taxes Voter Approved Number Allowed Under Allowed Taxes Taxes for the of Statutory Limits (Outside Statutory Redemption of Taxing Without Voter Limits)Without Bonded Indebtedness Levying Agency Bodies Approval Voter Approval and Special Levies t Total Levies State 1 $178,955,453 $ — — $ — — $178,955,453 County 1 65,172,434 — — 17,864,634 83,037,068 Port District 1 19,627,064* — — 19,627,064 Road District 1 23,902,373 23,902,373 Municipalities 29 75,814,172 — — 17,854,866 93,669,038 School Districts 21 — — — — 119,036,971 119,036,971 Fire Districts 34 16,300,082 — — 2,158,392 18,458,474 y Water Districts 39 — — — 8,092 8,092 Sewer Districts 18 — — — — — — — Rural Library 1 8,684,018 — — 506,463 9,190,481 County Airport 1 — — — — — — — — Hospital District 3 2,687,681 — — 2,059,202 4,746,883 Park and Recreation Districts 2 Flood Control Zones 10 Air Pollution District 1 Metro 1 Cemetery District 1 25,211 25,211 Emergency Medical Services 1 — — — — 7,368,040 7,368,040 TOTAL 166 $371,541,424 $19,627,064 $166,856,660 $558,025,148 •Provided by Constitutional exclusion. t Pie Constitution provides for taxing districts to raise additional funds upon approval by the voters of the districts flaw requires favorable majority of 6096 of 40%of the number of votes cast in the last previous general election) ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES STATE, COUNTY REAL PROPERTY AND PORT DISTRICT Assessed Value Assessed Value t Assssed Value State Public Omitted Real Property Service Assessments Land $18,892,014,285 $312,482,844 $ 2,154,400 Improvements 29,487,309,081 — 15,541,000 Personal Property — — — — — — TOTAL $48,379,323,366 $312,482,844 $17,695,400 State $48,379,323,666 $312,482,844 $17,695,400 County 48,379,323,366 312,482,844 17,695,400 Port 48,379,323,666 312,482,844 17,695,400 TAXES STATE, COUNTY AND PORT DISTRICTS Total Assessed Real Property State Pubic Omitted t Value Levy Rate Taxes Service Taxes Assessments Taxes STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 School Fund $54,224,927,949 $ 3.31752 $159,637,925 $1,035,668 $52,542 KING COUNTY Current Expense $54,113,157,545 $1.0430999 $ 50,194,207 $ 325,954 $17,003 River Improvement 54,113,157,545 .0331862 1,596,794 10,370 584 Soldiers Relief 54,113,157,345 .0071765 345,282 2,242 116 Mental Health 54,113,157,545 .0159478 767,317 4,983 258 Inter-County River Improvement 54,113,157,545 .0009263 44,543 289 19 Limited Tax G.O.Bonds 54,113,157,545 .0479033 2,304,971 14,968 687 Conservation Futures 54,070,365,648 .0625000 3,007,358 19,529 91 Refund Fund 17,687,365 — — — — — — 4 TOTAL(Within Statutory Limits) $54,113,157,545 $ 1.21074 $ 58,260,472 $ 378,335 $18,762 G.O.Bonds-Voter Approved 54,113,157,454 .33706 15,937,969 105,325 6,540 TOTAL COUNTY $54,113,157,545 $ 1.54780 $ 74,198,441 $ 483,660 $25,302 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES $54,113,157,545 $ .13904 $ 6,574,668 $ 43,448 $ 2,271 PORT OF SEATTLE General Fund $54,113,157,545 $ .30715 $ 14,779,850 $ 95,978 $ 5,031 Refund Fund 17,687,365 — — — — — — 1 Bond Redemption 54,113,157,545 .05745 2,764,507 17,952 893 TOTAL PORT $54,113,157,545 $ .36460 $ 17,544,357 $ 113,930 $ 5,925 t Levies for omitted assessments vary depending upon year of omission. TAXES PAYABLE IN 1984 ARE CALCULATED ON 1983 ASSESSED VALUES ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES PERSONAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Total Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value State Public Assessed Value State Public Omitted Assessed Value Personal Property Service Boats Service-Boats Assessments T^T•' S - - $ - - $ - - $ - - $19,206,651,529 Land 29,502,850,081 Improvements 3,740,316,398 1,576,773,191 1(15,447,723 6,322,681 86,566,346 5,515,426,339 Personal Property $3,740,316,398 $1,576,773,191 $105,447,723 $ 6,322,681 $86,566,346 $54,224,927,949 TOTAL $3,740,316,398 $1,576,773,191 $105,447,723 $ 6,322,681 $86,566,346 $54,224,927,949 State 3,740,316,398 1,576,773,191 - - - - 86,566,346 54,113,157,545 County 3,740,316,398 1,576,773,191 - - - 86,566,346 54,113,157,545 Port TAXES STATE, COUNTY AND PORT DISTRICTS Personal Property State Public Local Boat State Public Services Omitted t TOTAL Taxes Service Taxes Taxes Boat Taxes Assessment Taxes TAXES STATE OF WASHINGTON S12,368,973 $5,230,976 $349,825 $20,975 $257,569 $178,955,453 School Fund 1' KING COUNTY $ 3,889,119 $1,644,752 $ - - $ - - $ 81,503 $ 56,152,538 Current Expense 123,722 52,323 - - - 2,615 1,786,408 River Improvement 26,753 11,314 - - - - 562 386,269 Soldiers Relief 59,453 25,143 - - - - 1,249 858,403 Mental Health 3,451 1,460 - - - - 82 49,844 Inter-County River Improvement 178,592 75,529 - - - - 4,022 2,578,769 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds 233,014 98,545 - - - 1,616 3,360,153 Conservation Futures 46 50 Refund Fund $ 4,514,104 $1,909,066 $ - - $ - - $ 91,695 $ 65,172,434 TOTAL(Within Statutory Limits) 1,254,487 531,463 - - - - 28,850 17,864,634 G 0 Bonds-Voter Approved $ 5,768,591 $2,440,529 $ - - $ - - $120,545 $ 83,037,068 TOTAL COUNTY $ 517,496 $ 219,237 - - - - $ 10,920 $ 7,368,040 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PORT OF SEATTLE $ 1,145,164 $ 484,303 $ - - $ - - $ 24,682 $ 16,535,008 General Fund - - - - - - - - 15 16 Refund Fund 214,198 90,587 - - - - 3,903 3,092,040 Bond Redemption $ 1,359,362 $ 574,890 $ - - $ - - $ 28,600 $ 19,627,064 TOTAL PORT 'Boats, Cless II, included in this column ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES CITIES, TOWNS, ROAD AND LIBRARY REAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value' Assessed Value Assessed Value TOTAL State Public Omitted Land Buildings Land & Buildings Service-Real Assessments Seattle $ 7,682,911,603 $11,366,563,454 $19,049,475,057 $151,587,188 $ 1,508,700 Algona 15,159,800 17,655,100 32,814,900 234,217 - - Auburn 244,493,597 530.831,396 775,324,993 5,041,759 800,000 Beaux Arts 5,964,500 7,364,300 13,328,800 - - - - Bellevue-1 757,561,170 1,018,408,489 1,775,969,659 45,844,313 2,430,500 Bellevue-4 208,775,796 345,611,561 554,387,357 2,750,600 -Bellevue-5 568,412,230 1,111,797,035 1,680,209,265 4,166,652 Bellevue-6 27,563,650 42,832,900 70,396,550 46,437 - - Bellevue-7 1,468,800 3,431,500 4,900,300 - - - Black Diamond 13,056,981 11,889,400 24,946,381 382,583 - Bothell 84,999,000 156,343,499 241,342,499 473,527 214,800 Carnation 5,724,700 12,214,200 17,938,900 57,760 - - Clyde Hill 76,954,840 107,094,500 184,049,340 - - - - Des Moines 97,516,750 190,496,050 288,012,800 1,272,345 - - Duvall 9,235,700 13,494,600 22,730,300 17,173 -Enumclaw 51,662,230 100,707,900 152,370,130 356,862 - Hunts Point 55,646,000 32,208,700 87,854,700 - - - - Issaquah 72,833,900 131,738,131 204,572,031 1,672,884 118,000 2 Kent 349,299,330 941,755,386 1,291,054,716 14,643,532 1,829,700 Kirkland-1 130,868,900 239,163,600 370,032,500 1,849,799 -Kirkland-3 65,415,930 138,412,000 203,827,930 2,210,931 - - Kirkland-4 101,804,900 161,993,813 263,798,713 87,392 - - Lake Forest Park-1 24,029,900 40,596,600 64,626,500 - - - - Lake Forest Park-2 7,652,800 18,775,600 26,428,400 - - - - Medina 156,360,830 111,218,200 267,579,030 180,178 - Mercer Island 479,333,850 623,056,607 1,102,390,457 1,275,803 - - Milton 3,827,600 5,654,300 9,481,900 4,725 - - Normandy Park 105,206,850 144,621,200 249,828,050 - - - - North Bend 17,276,057 29,720,900 46,996,957 378,401 Pacific 20,495,700 32,638,200 53,133,900 300,696 - Redmond 451,659,870 746,753,000 1,198,412,870 12,541,245 940,800 Renton 401,258,380 886,041,220 1,287,299,600 24,127,991 5,190,900 Skykomish 1,621,700 3,419,722 5,041,422 268,780 - - Snoqualmie 8,722,100 17,333,700 26,055,800 1,350,752 709,600 Tukwila 137,180,540 446,153,175 583,333,715 2,102,152 - - Yarrow Point 44,734,020 44,195,200 88,929,220 - - - - TOTAL-Cities &Towns $12,486,690,504 $19,832,185,138 $32,318,875,642 $275,226,677 $13,743,000 ROAD DISTRICT Road District Fund $ 6,405,323,781 $ 9,655,123,943 $16,060,447,724 $ 37,256,167 $ 3,952,400 Current Expense Fund 6,405,323,781 9,655,123,943 16,060,447,724 37,256,167 3,952,400 TOTAL-Road District $ 6,405,323,781 $ 9,655,123,943 $16,060,447,724 $ 37,256,167 $ 3,952,400 RURAL LIBRARY Library-Incorporated $ 715,154,942 $ 1,206,212,750 $ 1,921,367,692 $ 15,151,755 $ - - Library-Unincorporated 6,405,323,781 9,655,123,943 16,060,447,724 37,256,167 3,952,400 TOTAL-Rural Library $ 6,405,323,781 $ 9,655,123,943 $16,060,441,724 $ 37,256,167 $ 3,952,400 'Levies for omitted assessments vary with each year ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value t Personal State Public Omitted Assescprl Vake Pronertv Service re.bUIIdi assessments TOTAL Levy TOTAL TAX $1,477,987,111 $503,875,984 $46,577,386 $21,231,011,426 $ 2.76032 $57,832,600 Seattle 422,677 799,184 - - 34,270,978 2.38343 79,483 Algona 328,047,465 31,418,508 1,368,787 1,142,001,512 2.44847 2,776,291 Auburn 5,204 121,415 - - 13,455,419 3.21931 43,317 Beaux Arts 141,372,776 48,378,154 2,087,166 2,016,082,568 2.17814 4,383,884 Bellevue-1 28,924,791 12,414,017 425,028 598,901,793 2.12476 1,271,177 Bellevue-4 66,551,492 40,220,491 1,535,291 1,792,683,191 2.07350 3,710,566 Bellevue-5 5,452,036 665,226 58,300 76,618,549 1.99493 152,754 Bellevue-6 93,553 - - 4,993,853 1.90464 9,512 Bellevue-7 2,232,865 2,103,634 - - 29,665,463 1.12335 32,512 Black Diamond 8,070,377 10,240,284 206,234 260,547,721 3.22622 831,132 Bothell 458,643 902,047 33,284 19,390,634 3.45956 65,158 Carnation 218,142 1,565,302 3,754 185,836,538 1.13498 210,830 Clyde Hill 7,218,967 9,985,940 296,169 306,786,221 1.70368 520,164 Des Moines 1,302,031 575,185 137,987 24,762,676 3.17434 77,562 Duvall 15,321,436 4,419,732 298,110 172,766,270 2.54312 430,452 Enumclaw - - 305,374 - - 88,160,074 .74392 65,569 Hunts Point 11,109,924 6,021,070 115,534 223,609,443 3.04920 676,064 Issaquah 333,867,564 55,459,613 3,768,476 1,700,623,601 2.56598 4,352,392 Kent 18,894,026 16,737,341 990,598 408,504,264 2.08618 842,072 Kirkland-1 1; 14,789,188 4,195,157 453,677 225,476,883 1.94729 437,452 Kirkland-3 5,255,324 4,111,825 207,828 273,461,082 2.03441 554,602 Kirkland-4 992,999 438,107 7,268 66,064,874 2.67845 175,419 Lake Forest Park-1 230,258 239,383 971 26,899,012 1.98252 53,169 Lake Forest Park-2 467,516 1,966,900 - - 270,193,624 .98824 266,611 Medina 8,541,486 14,137,778 173,155 1,126,518,679 2.32538 2,615,134 Mercer Island 4,413,978 130,045 - - 14,030,648 2.79490 38,752 Milton 1,347,904 3,005,436 68,949 254,250,339 3.30738 839,566 Normandy Park 2,624,854 3,707,833 146 53,708,191 2.56042 135,710 North Bend 1,146,299 983,527 130,314 55,694,736 1.86542 102,511 Pacific 106,301,208 40,443,347 2,925,563 1,361,565,033 2.41238 3,276,152 Redmond 369,014,729 85,678,989 1,706,945 1,773,019,154 2.73338 4,820,288 Renton 208,085 666,998 820 6,186,105 3.37500 20,641 Skykomish 893,877 3,610,848 - - 32,620,877 2.55473 81,124 Snoqualmie 104,697,165 18,135,763 3,062,383 711,331,178 2.51996 1,791,071 Tukwila 17,368 514,970 - - 89,461,558 1.09046 97,345 Yarrow Point $3,068,399,765 $928,268,960 $66,640,123 $36,671,154,167 $93,669,038 TOTAL-Cities &Towns $671,916,633 $648,504,231 $19,926,223 $17,442,003,378 $1.1373943 $19,752,442 ROAD DISTRICT 671,916,633 648,504,231 19,926,223 17,442,003,378 .2389057 4,149,931 Road District Fund $671,916,633 $648,504,231 $19,926,223 $17,442,003,378 $ 1.37630 $23,902,373 TOTAL-Road District RURAL LIBRARY $ 82,006,863 $ 53,616,849 $ - - $ 2,072,143,149 $ .02636 $ 54,109 Library-Incorporated 671,916,633 648,504,231 19,926,223 17,442,003,378 .52636 9,136,372 Library-Unincorporated $671,916,633 $648,504,231 $19,926,233 $17,442,003,378 $ .52636 $ 9,190,481 TOTAL-Rural Library t Boats, Class II, inc/uded in this column. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICTS REAL PROPERTY Assessed Value Assessed Value State Public Omitted District Land Improvements Total Service-Real Assessments" 001 Seattle $ 7,748,128,403 $11,466,677,854 $19,214,806,257 $151,691,812 $ 1,508,700 195 Lester 4,485,267 69,700 4,554,967 735,749 — — 210 Federal Way 955,488,950 1,449,170,065 2,404,659,015 4,070,755 26,100 216 Enumclaw 253,691,177 265,417,746 519,108,923 5,898,395 151,800 400 Mercer Island 479,333,850 623,056,607 1,102,390,457 1,275,803 — — 401 Highline 991,665,700 1,904,963,612 2,896,629,312 7,765,915 48,500 402 Vashon 246,023,724 163,576,673 409,600,397 670,361 — — 14 403 Renton 813,305,060 1,742,976,150 2,556,281,210 26,077,679 5,190,900 404 Skykomish 16,484,857 12,429,122 28,913,979 2,143,345 91,800 405 Bellevue 2,180,773,822 3,270,915,935 5,451,689,757 53,471,764 3,857,000 406 South Central 145,796,940 400,178,541 545,975,481 2,116,583 — — 407 Lower Snoqualmie 157,942,516 98,220,836 256,163,352 789,373 182,800 408 Auburn 413,012,483 765,108,896 1,178,121,379 5,892,083 853,100 409 Tahoma 238,888,062 214,133,450 453,021,512 1,702,624 — — 410 Snoqualmie Valley 204,959,497 229,097,210 434,056,707 3,051,857 759,100 411 Issaquah 537,119,678 691,242,804 1,228,362,482 2,652,659 1,677,900 412 Shoreline 709,140,870 1,225,588,607 1,934,729,477 594,891 — — 414 Lake Washington 1,368,859,588 2,311,428,323 3,680,287,911 20,394,002 1,066,700 415 Kent 841,200,486 1,717,115,890 2,558,316,376 16,037,492 1,846,900 417 Northshore 565,164,955 905,722,160 1,470,887,115 5,389,221 434,100 888 Fife 20,548,400 30,218,900 50,767,300 60,481 — — TOTAL $18,892,014,285 $29,487,309,081 $48,379,323,366 $312,482,844 $17,695,400 "Levies for omitted assessments vary with each year. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICTS PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Personal State Public Omitted Assessed Value Levy TOTAL Property t Service t Assessments t TOTAL Rate TAX District $1,691,522,412 $ 507,880,997 $47,731,568 $21,615,141,746 $1.87888 $ 39,348,974 Seattle 001 13,165 846,830 — — 6,150,711 3.11951 19,187 Lester 195 103,367,043 68,736,785 3,149,935 2,584,009,633 1.79596 4,599,963 Federal Way 210 35,378,267 16,500,062 562,970 577,600,417 2.03238 1,143,175 Enumclaw 216 8,541,486 14,137,778 173,155 1,126,518,679 4.11922 4,600,72 Mercer Island 400 93,455,062 337,326,371 7,824,035 3,343,049,195 2.00633 6,541,613 Highline 401 7,146,845 9,080,651 219,414 426,717,668 2.39955 1,002,347 Vashon 402 487,304,417 116,446,463 4,278,755 3,195,579,424 1.35641 4,267,361 Renton 403 l, 3,837,937 1,906,864 27,499 36,921,424 — — 140 Skykomish 404 285,070,092 120,275,250 5,587,181 5,919,951,044 2.29716 13,501,568 Bellevue 405 57,572,652 14,315,350 1,190,697 621,170,763 3.28373 2,007,294 South Central 406 6,661,385 6,767,236 278,345 270,842,491 3.36120 898,012 Lower Snoqualmie 407 334,539,665 41,196,249 1,845,984 1,562,448,460 2.38808 3,669,529 Auburn 408 8,193,886 12,557,756 242,648 475,718,426 2.71965 1,270,563 Tahoma 409 31,619,565 19,860,212 128,591 489,476,032 1.88402 902,726 Snoqualmie Valley 410 32,298,385 30,855,238 568,357 1,296,415,021 2.53789 3,256,699 Issaquah 411 35,157,470 23,903,338 540,970 1,994,926,146 2.72337 5,300,014 Shoreline 412 136,118,609 105,538,884 6,680,874 3,950,086,980 2.78844 10,899,528 Lake Washington 414 330,351,272 92,933,927 4,445,586 3,003,931,553 3.22791 9,598,782 Kent 415 47,169,662 35,053,669 1,063,534 1,559,997,301 3.94683 6,081,244 Northsore 417 4,997,121 653,281 26,248 56,504,431 2.34970 127,531 Fife 888 $3,740,316,398 $1,576,773,191 $86,566,346 $54,113,157,545 $119,036,971 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES WATER DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Unincorporated Incorporated TOTAL Levy Rate TOTAL TAX No. 01 $ - $ 44,731,651 $ 44,731,651 $ - - $ - - 14 59,054,693 220,600 59,275,293 - - -- - 19 107,814,137 - - 107,814,137 - - - - 20 662,421,941 - - 662,421,941 - - 25 25,879,284 672,812 26,552,096 _ _ - - 42 579,718,466 233,629,973 813,348,439 - - - 16 45 47,230,129 - - 47,230,129 - - 49 396,355,889 25,351,658 421,707,547 - - 54 2,468,599 93,769,541 96,238,140 .08445 8,000 56 128,340,133 49,394,486 177,734,619 - - - - 57 5,347,252 - - 5,347,252 - - - - 58 777,584,855 11,254,568 788,839,423 - - - - 63 62,010,708 - - 62,010,708 - - - - 68 - - 5,117,989 5,117,989 - - 85 68-1 - - 125,385,657 125,385,657 - - - - 69 23,766,082 - - 23,766,082 - - - - 15 1,125,614,153 409,487,079 1,535,101,232 - - - - 77 43,750,303 - - 43,750,303 - - - - 79 178,984 8,170 187,154 - - - - 79-1 147,813 - - 147,813 - - 2 81 318,718,197 622,232,122 940,950,319 - - - - ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES WATER DISTRICTS (CONT. ) Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Unincorporated Incorporated TOTAL Levy Rate TOTAL TAX No. 82 $ 395,040,394 $ — — $ 395,040,394 $ — — $ — — 83 29,321,270 65,728,003 95,049,273 — — — — 85 51,282,882 — — 51,282,882 — — — — 86 52,606,627 72,400 52,679,027 — — — — 87 7,703,993 11,103,217 18,807,210 — — — .. 16,247,351 — — 16,247,351 — — — — 90 341,836,753 2,985,689 344,822,442 — — — ` 17 94 8,415,048 — — 8,415,048 — — — — 104 860,265,632 47,364,792 907,630,424 — — — — 105 506,801,303 — — 506,801,303 — — — — 107 466,657,655 152,620,347 619,278,002 — — — — 108 301,831,526 — — 301,831,526 — — — — 111 220,709,644 — — 220,709,644 — — — — 117 4,785,702 — — 4,785,702 — — — 119 48,332,798 — — 48,332,798 — — — — 122 66,100 — — 66,100 — — 5 123 4,308,962 — — 4,308,962 — — — — 124 1,953,173,204 27,483,830 1,980,657,034 — — — 125 309,971,230 34,070,437 344,041,667 — — — — 127 45,030,812 — — 45,030,812 — — — — 999 1,411,610,882 116,509,173 1,528,120,055 — — — — TOTAL $11,402,401,386 $2,079,194,194 $13,481,595,580 $8,092 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES FIRE DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy No. Land Improvements Other t TOTAL Rate TOTAL TAX 1 $61,817,000 $94,707,433 $157,582,018 $314,106,451 $1.00000 $313,541 2 259,016,290 460,207,239 63,434,085 782,657,614 1.00000 778,435 4-1 City 4,919,400 12,245,300 140,928 17,305,628 .01624 279 4-County 547,987,970 963,843,236 50,470,466 1,562,301,672 1.01624 1,577,686 5 40,824,000 57,976,520 2,429,096 101,229,616 .53770 53,968 10-County 493,926,308 596,558,209 44,526,123 1,135,010,640 1,52897 1,727,807 10-1 City 5,704,300 964,400 161,146 6,849,846 .06306 432 10-2 County 872,900 1,185,600 52,050 2,110,550 1.41337 2,983 18 10-3 City 1,043,800 326,100 3,670 1,373,570 .54110 743 10-8 County 7,005,100 18,725,500 648,083 26,378,683 .11560 3,014 10-9 County 1,835,690 601,600 72,154 2,509,444 .11560 290 11 334,534,360 662,062,904 49,152,453 1,045,749,717 1.00000 1,033,887 13 246,023,724 163,576,673 17,117,271 426,717,668 .52831 224,158 14 151,970,666 237,084,500 17,474,402 406,529,568 1.05743 429,070 16-County 259,230,790 415,595,851 23,520,672 698,347,313 1.12368 780,830 16-1 City 769,500 1,525,400 56,022 2,350,922 .12368 291 17 36,885,164 28,676,363 1,453,118 67,014,645 .22706 15,153 18 37,192,900 74,026,383 12,262,108 123,481,391 1.00000 122,469 20 118,225,000 194,707,300 6,484,037 319,416,337 1.00000 316,108 24-County 106,916,100 280,066,400 51,689,303 438,671,803 1.08718 471,540 24-1 County 45,504,000 112,995,500 5,511,514 164,011,014 1.00000 162,648 25-County 164,384,654 383,324,344 20,047,630 567,756,628 1.0000 565,864 25-2 County 4,306,180 6,820,700 2,318,967 13,445,847 1.00000 13,186 26-City 97,516,750 190,496,050 18,477,252 306,490,052 1.00000 305,207 26-County 62,681,850 108,123,600 5,858,793 176,664,243 1.00000 175,641 27-County 41,636,475 57,037,700 5,782,870 94,457,045 1.24704 115,902 27-1 City 582,700 289,600 4,217,151 5,089,451 .24704 1,257 28 111,101,478 107,053,983 13,758,400 231,913,861 .52457 120,967 31 6,578,460 9,198,419 417,950 16,194,829 .68894 11,033 34 270,828,774 252,658,844 27,915,381 551,462,999 1.00000 550,389 35 42,387,815 28,061,600 4,205,329 74,654,744 1.04200 77,312 t Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, Watercraft and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES rltit DIS I KIU l S (CONT.) Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy No. Land Improvements Other t TOTAL Rate TOTAL TAX 36 $279,564,114 $ 453,797,461 $ 40,511,404 $ 773,872,979 $1.00000 $ 772,783 37-County 368,261,045 619,089,973 55,281,896 1,042,652,914 • 1.15550 1,198,454 37-1 City 257,900 228,600 48,931 535,431 .15550 83 38 64,328, 864 99,495,410 14,292,313 178,116,587 .90382 159,786 39-County 837,447,890 1,245,810,954 167,339,166 2,250,598,010 1.06132 2,381,139 39-1 County 100,382,560 139,008,192 12,072,330 251,463,082 1.06132 265,116 39-3City 1,228,600 2,712,100 51,750 3,992,450 .00566 23 39-5 City 2,521,200 2,994,900 89,566 5,605,666 .09483 532 39-8 County 10,695,100 21,526,500 1,233,862 33,455,462 .00566 182 19 39-9 City 11,761,800 24,702,100 3,369,452 39,833,352 .00566 223 40 178,101,020 413,623,300 24,797,275 616,521,595 1.90276 1,164,750 41-County 316,561,040 677,373,166 39,034,333 1,032,968,539 .80544 829,972 41-1 County — — — — 59,634 59,634 — — 66 41-2 City — — — — 79,389 79,389 — — 1 42-County 65,358,490 108,718,100 15,113,193 189,189,783 1.10420 208,152 42-1 City 2,190,200 2,817,999 77,639 5,085,838 .10420 517 43-County 255,500,480 262,867,650 25,108,814 543,476,944 1.44849 779,457 43-9 County 1,835,690 601,600 72,154 2,509,444 .44849 1,125 44 152,739,099 186,565,800 12,032,763 351,337,662 1.23801 433,403 45-County 68,381,198 36,621,936 5,757,835 110,760,969 1.25383 138,061 45-1 City 61,200 — — — — 61,200 .25383 15 46 62,780,994 55,663,800 4,997,779 123,442,573 1.00000 122,943 47 11,826,670 9,925,700 1,447,710 23,200,080 .75555 17,319 49 3,327,110 9,573,200 1,447,689 14,347,999 .75243 10,796 50 9,917,2700 8,593,100 4,800,898 23,311,268 .92535 21,486 'Total-Incorporated $ 116,795,550 $ 214,600,449 $ 23,423,444 $ 354,819,443 $ 309,603 "Total Unincorporated $6,219,330,702 $9,612,277,043 $1,007,619,068 $16,839,226,813 $18,148,871 Grand Total $18,458,474 "Areas annexed to cities or towns assessed for bond issues outstanding at time of annexation. "Actual value of taxable property within current boundaries of fire districts. t Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, Watercraft and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SEWER DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy TOTAL Name Land Improvements Other* Total Rate TAX Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge-City $ 400,600 $ 243,100 $ 2,880 $ 646,580 $ - - $ - - Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge-County 65,736,800 96,394,300 2,455,566 164,586,666 - - -- - Cascade-City 4,265,740 4,332,100 276,704 8,874,544 - - - - Cascade-County 325,223,790 615,331,742 39,651,087 980,206,619 - - - - Des Moines-City 116,543,650 202,150,117 20,674,352 339,368,119 - - - - Des Moines-County 185,595,399 401,177,013 54,573,892 641,346,304 - East Mercer 21,306,000 33,201,314 730,186 55,237,500 - - - - Eastgate-City 107,441,574 164,830,900 7,297,754 279,570,228 - - - - 2 0 Eastgate-County 203,236,116 326,574,600 17,766,105 547,576,821 - - - - Highlands 23,735,900 27,453,900 135,942 51,325,742 - - - - Lakehaven-City 2,913,900 5,472,300 4,558,016 12,944,216 - - - - Lakehaven-County 720,013,250 1,100,438,123 144,920,489 1,965,371,862 - - - Mercer Island 449,142,450 577,652,793 23,010,280 1,049,805,523 - - - - N.E.Lake Washington-City 42,948,550 99,005,000 15,669,538 157,623,088 - - - - N.E.Lake Washington-County 495,968,880 1,027,717,266 59,971,767 1,583,657,913 - - - - Rainier Vista 93,150,140 200,936,363 11,810,600 305,897,103 - - - Ronald-City 581,700 1,593,900 36,466 2,212,066 - - - - Ronald-County 321,423,330 582,985,687 38,958,337 943,367,354 - - - - Sahalee 72,870,882 101,471,400 3,006,308 177,348,590 - - - - S.W.Suburban-City 51,586,100 98,024,500 1,469,131 151,079,731 - - - - S.W.Suburban-County 350,526,690 648,076,786 46,582,631 1,045,186,107 - - - - Stevens Pass - - - - 1,451,957 1,451,957 - - - - Summit 3,248,810 9,573,200 1,441,939 14,263,949 - - - - Val Vue-City 208,600 268,600 9,954 487,154 - - - - Val Vue-County 90,700,400 212,872,433 36,835,322 340,408,155 - - - - Vashon Island 8,680,090 12,908,000 5,964,883 27,552,973 - - TOTAL $3,757,449,341 $6,550,685,437 $539,262,086 $10,847,396,864 - - $ - - 'Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, Watercraft and Omitted Assessments. ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES OTHER TAXING DISTRICTS FLOOD CONTROL Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Venue Levy TOTAL Name Land Improvements other' Total Rate TAX Cumberland-County $ 2,520,624 $ 2,481,800 S 355,877 $ 5,358,301 $- - A- - Enumclaw-City 51,662,230 100,707,900 20,396,140 172,766,270 - - '-- Enumdaw County 86,519,746 79,725,880 19,433,778 185,679,404 - - -- Evans Creek•City 6,270,910 1,353,200 5,576,088 _13,200,198 -- - - Evans Creek-County 134,148,384 145,248,744 13,742,843 293,139,971 - - -- Green Over-City 771,610,881 2,068,765,867 742,712,220 3,583,288,968 Green River County 449,165,937 842,814,619 108,412,719 1,400,393,275 Green Water County 716,951 343,000 5,389 1,065,340 - -- IOmbeN Creek Crty 5,424,000 10,533,600 1,644,917 17,602,517 - - -- 1Gmball Creek-County 4,417,853 5,059,000 454,122 9,930,975 - - -- Patterson Creek-County 50,331,081 24,007,000 1,709,735 76,047,816 - - - - Sikes-County 23,324,800 21,881,500 2,542,257 47,748,557 -- -- S.W.lake Sammamish•City 71,984,500 144,068,400 42,898,930 258,951,830 - - - - S.W.Lake Sammamish County 170,383,060 248,647,100 10,204,940 429,235,100 -W.Lake Sammamish City 187,269,710 323,651,600 8,938,828 519,860,138 - - - - W.Lake Sammamish•County 8,685,467 9,077,200 165,468 17,928,135 - - TOTAL $2,024,636,134 $4,028,366,410 $979,194,251 $7,032,196,795 $- - HOSPITAL DISTRICTS Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Assessed Value Levy TOTAL 2 No. Land Improvements Other' Total Rate TAX 1-City S 817,413,020 $2,046,783,537 $ 993,178,030 $3,857,374,593 $.25201 $ 964,698 1-County 945,562,691 1,750,526,817 125,209,490 2,821,298,998 .25201 701,723 2-City B23,657,600 1,436,122,312 247,114,071 2,506,893,983 .49779 1,240,315 2-County 1,157,163,084 1,822,484,071 143,616,732 3,123,263,887 .49779 1,547,513 4-City 25,998,157 47,054,600 13,276,311 86,329,068 .60601 50,705 4-County 177,792,288 184,189,688 43,567,256 405,549,232 .60607 241,929 TOTAL $3,947,586,840 $7,287,161,025 $1,565,961,890 $12,800,709,755 64,746,1:3 DRAINAGE DISTRICTS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICTS No. Total Benefits Levy Rate Tax Name Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax 1 $2,873,877 S48.78428 $140,392 Coalfield $ 200,525,925 $ . $ 2 2,057,136 .97223 2,012 Shoreline 1,942.406,536 - 5 2,280,925 5.26103 12,055 6 6,029,201 1.99032 12,011 7 6,771,427 .14768 1,002 13 2,678,381 1.19476 3,201 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL $22,690,947 $170,673 Name Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Air Pollution $54,113,157,545 $ - - County Airport 426,717,668 - - - Metro 54,113,157,545 - - - - FOREST PATROL Cemetery-1 426,717,668 .05941 25,211 Acres Levy Rate Tax 449,972 $27000 S152,988 'Includes Personal Property, State Public Service, Watercraft and Omitted Assessments. COMPARISON OF 1983 AND 1984 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES STATE, COUNTY, PORT, ROAD, EMERGENCY MEDICAL, COUNTY LIBRARY, CITIES AND TOWNS 1983 1984 INCREASE OR DECREASE DISTRICT Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Tax State $56,508,598,284 $2.94146 $165,730,596 $54,224,927,949 $3.31752 $178,9055,453 $-2,283,670,335 $13,224,1357 County 56,469,280,326 1.361130 76,240,506 54,113,157,545 1.54780 83,037,068 -2,356,122,781 6,796,562 Port 56,469,280,326 .32416 18,216,333 54,113,157,545 .36460 19,627,064 -2,356,122,781 1,410,731 Road District 17,536,504,846 1.26467 22,106,432 17,442,003,3713 1.37630 23,902,373 -94,501,468 1,795,941 Emergency Medical Services 56,463,981,156 .12370 6,835,597 54,113,157,545 13904 7,368,040 -2,350,823,611 532,443 County Library 17,536,504,646 .49593 8,704,807 17,442,003,378 .55272 9,190,481 -94,501,468 485,674 TOTAL $297,834,271 $322,080,479 $24,246,208 Seattle $22,035,059,855 $2.56271 S55,488,194 $21,231,011,426 $2.76032 $57,832,601 $-804,048,429 $2,343,807 Algona 33,650,361 2.27650 75,112 34,270,978 2.38343 79,483 620,617 4,371 Auburn 1,520,083,105 1.94043 2,927,423 1,142,001,512 2.44847 2,776,291 -378,081,593 - 151,132 Beaux Arts 13,385,543 2.27769 30,488 13,455,419 3.21931 43,317 69,876 12,829 Bellevue-1 1,992,769,022 2.01940 4,017,351 2,016,082,568 2.17814 4,383,884 23,313,546 366,533 )_2 Bellevue-4 621,175,525 1.96995 1,223,035 598,901,793 2.12476 1,271,177 -22,273,732 48,142 Bellevue-5 1,755,909,186 1.92082 3,369,121 1,792,603,191 2.07350 3,710,566 36,774,005 341,445 Bellevue-6 96,045,817 1.84476 177,036 76,618,549 1.99493 152,754 -19,427,268 -24,282 Bellevue-7 4,991,191 1.75721 8,771 4,993,853 1.90464 9,512 2,662 741 Black Diamond 30,087,460 1.01031 29,850 29,665,463 1.12335 32,512 -421,997 2,662 Bothell 260,617,294 2.20231 570,419 260,547,721 3.22622 831,131 -69,573 260,712 Carnation 19,496,311 3.03718 57,720 19,390,634 3.45956 65,158 -105,677 7,438 Clyde Hill 1133,188,747 1.07167 196,269 185,836,538 1.13498 210,830 2,647,791 14,561 Des Moines 239,068,798 2.50079 594,683 306,786,221 1.10368 520,164 67,714,423 -74,519 Dwell 23,591,587 4.00020 92,799 24,762,676 3.17434 77,562 1,171,089 -15,237 Enumclaw 180,778,848 2.12961 38,902 172,766,270 2.54312 430,452 -8,012,578 49,550 Hunts Point 88,190,456 .70101 61,810 88,160,074 .74392 65,569 -30,382 3,759 Issaquah 225,104,429 3.06306 684,035 223,609,443 3.04920 676,064 - 1,494,986 -7,971 Kern 2,040,018,349 2.06383 4,205,118 1,700,623,601 2.56598 4,352,392 -339,394,748 147,274 Kakland•1 416,631,897 1.91294 789,498 408,504,264 2.0E1618 842,072 -8,127,633 52,574 llrklaod-2 7,426,756 1.78494 13,256 - -- - - -7,426,756 -13,256 Ikrkland-3 216,732,242 1.78494 386,154 225,476,1383 1.94129 437,452 8,744,641 51,298 Kirkland-4 272,732,966 1.85641 504,569 273,461,082 2.03441 554,602 728,116 50,033 Lake Forest Park-1 69,029,058 2.42216 165,994 66,064,874 2.67845 175,419 2,964,184 9,425 Lake Forest Part-2 26,522,894 1.82818 48,406 26,899,012 1.98252 53,169 376,118 4,763 Medina 268,428,602 .93640 250,950 270,193,624 .9:,24 266,611 1,765,022 15,661 Mercer Island 1,124,744,054 2.19831 2,468,894 1,126,518,679 2.32538 2,615,134 1,774,625 146,240 Milton 12,081,827 2.78780 33,338 14,030,648 2.79490 38,752 1,948,821 5,414 Normandy Park 193,587,956 3.09678 598,895 254,250,339 3.30138 839,566 60,662,383 240,671 North Bend 55,694,935 2.35309 129,713 53,708,191 2.56042 135,710 - 1,986,744 5,997 Pacific 54,627,876 1.86897 101,046 55,694,736 1.86542 102,511 1,066,860 1,465 Redmond 1,405,316,511 2.18844 3,070,427 1,361,565,033 2.41238 3,276,152 43,751,418 205,725 Renton 2,388,519,338 2.47888 5,801,648 1,773,019,154 2.73338 4,820,288 615,500,184 -981,360 Skykomish 6,098,694 3.37500 20,413 6,186,105 3.37500 20,641 87,411 228 Snoqualmie 26,722,384 1.61791 42,234 32,620,877 2.55473 81,124 5,898,493 38,890 Tukwila 935,656,308 2.03507 1,915,439 711,331,118 2.51996 1,791,071 -224,325,130 -124,368 Yarrow 89,009,298 1.02464 90,956 89,461,558 1.09046 97,345 452,260 6,389 TOTAL Cities Et Towns $38,932,775,480 $90,622,566 $36,671,154,167 493,669,038 9-2,261,621,313 $3,046,412 COMPARISON OF 1983 AND 1984 ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND TAXES SCHOOLS, WATER, FIRE, SEWER, HOSPITAL DISTRI(TR AND FLOOD ZONES 1983 1984 INCREASE OR DECREASE District Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Levy Rate Tax Assessed Value Tax Seattle 001 $22,549,836,677 $2.51165 $ 54,718,499 $21,615,141,746 $1.87888 $ 39,3413,974 $ -934,694,931 $-15,369,525 Lester 195 14,251,561 2.45806 35,031 6,150,711 3.11951 19,187 -8,100,850 -15,844 Federal Way 210 2,571,709,264 1.73277 4,419,986 2,584,009,633 1.79596 4,599,963 12,300,369 179,977 Enumclaw 216 594,961,063 2.13664 1,242,178 577,600,417 2.03238 1,143,175 -17,360,646 -99,003 Mercer Island 400 1,124,744,054 4.09722 4,572,072 1,126,518,679 4.11922 4,600,719 1,774,625 28,647 *Nine 401 3,334,506,619 1.83082 5,952,417 3,343,049,195 2.00633 6,541,613 8,542,576 589,196 Vashon 402 432,070,748 2.14037 907,559 426,717,668 2.39955 1,002,347 -5,353,080 94,7:: Renton 403 4,007,294,787 1.19619 4,700,047 3,195,579,424 1.35641 4,267,361 -811,715,363 -432,686 Skykomish 414 36,311,500 2.08508 74,999 36,921,424 - - 141 609,924 -74,858 Bellevue 405 5,925,563,261 2.88292 16,945,270 5,919,951,044 2.29716 13,501,568 -5,612,217 -3,443,702 South Central 406 707,073,708 3.18892 2,223,419 621,170,763 3.28373 2,007,294 -85,902,945 -216,125 Lower Snot.Valley 407 258,698,360 3.30991 844,195 270,842,491 3.36120 898,012 12,144,131 53,817 Auburn 408 1,931,160,876 1.97241 3,749,412 1,562,448,460 2.38808 3,669,529 -368,712,416 -79,883 2' Tahoma 409 464,660,955 2.74453 1,253,362 475,718,426 2.71965 1,270,563 11,057,471 17,201 Snoqualmie 410 490,564,910 2.27668 1,093,250 489,476,032 1.88402 902,726 -1,088,878 -190,524 Issaquah 411 1,273,333,643 2.48540 3,133,697 1,296,415,021 2.53789 3,256,699 23,081,378 123,002 Shoreline 412 2,014,019,207 3.04123 5,975,016 1,994,926,146 2.72337 5,300,014 -19,093,061 -675,002 Lake Washington 414 3,901,492,132 3.14307 12,124,484 3,950,086,980 2.78844 10,899,528 48,594,848 -1,224,956 Kent 415 3,253,917,197 2.60512 8,399,005 3,003,931,553 3.22791 9,598,702 -249,985,644 1,199,777 Northshore 417 1,529,281,213 3.74891 5,660,896 1,559,997,301 3.94683 6,081,245 30,716,088 420,349 Ffe 53,828,591 1.39600 71,433 56,504,431 2.34970 127,531 2,675,840 56,098 TOTAL SCHOOLS $56,469,280,326 $138,096,227 $54,113,157,545 $119,036,971 5-2,356,122,781 6-19,059,256 Water Districts 915,936,8::,921 $ - - $ 17,114 $13,481,595,580 $ - - 8,092 $-2,455,293,341 $ -9,022 Are Districts 16,950,263,055 - 17,496,063 17,246,566,678 - - 18,458,474 296,303,623 962,411 Sewer Districts 10,744,744,106 - - 3 10,847,396,864 - - - - 102,652,758 -3 Hospital Districts 19,530,647,734 - - 3,623,423 18,495,777,682 - - 4,746,883 -1,034,870,052 1,123,460 Rood Zone Districts 7,788,057,403 - - - - 7,032,196,795 - - - - -755,860,608 - - Cemetery Districts 432,070,748 .05526 23,802 426,717,668 .05941 25,211 -5,353,080 1,409 TOTAL 6 21,160,405 6 23,238,660 $ 2,078,255 GRAND TOTAL TAX KING COUNTY $547,713,469 $558,025,148 $ 10,311,679 DISTRIBUTION OF TAXES BILLED THROUGHOUT KING COUNTY 1965 THROUGH 1984 Rural All Other Tax State School Municipal Road Library County Taxing Avg.' Year Purposes Purposes Purposes Purposes Districts Purposes Port Districts TOTALS Levy 1965. . $ 5,676,955.18 $ 54,370,949.11 $22,530,402.12 $ 4,146,405.27 $ 829,279.19 $13,581,769.19 $ 9,267,474.85 $ 1,847,935.43 S112,251,170.34 70.25 1966. . 6,518,265.59 60,922,307.65 23,693,731.37 4,371,335.17 874,270.26 14,389,062.66 9,726,907.44 1,951,750.13 122,447,630.27 72.96 1967. . 7,865,256.30 75,172,267.55 25,461,207.02 4,808,604.93 961,717.60 15,670,334.59 10,471,373.40 2,564,723.53 142,975,484.92 77.82 1968. . 20,204,223.54 84,694,865.55 27,854,084.86 5,359,031.07 1,714,891.58 17,011,830.93 11,434,843.57 2,934,906.18 171,208,677.28 84.96 1969. . 22,871,304.80 103,496,285.01 30,885,074.81 6,328,991.76 1,772,112.46 24,899,141.40 8,185,999.45 3,769,631.51 202,208,541.20 88.66 1970. . 25,534,634.26 134,696,780.32 34,776,099.09 7,112,310.68 1,872,042.88 25,339,435.08 7,686,138.52 3,746,405.52 240,763,846.35 96.79 24 1971. . 26,489,369.39 155,568,917.42 37,711,325.30 7,136,970.70 2,725,137.62 29,574,297.92 11,354,425.56 4,181,222.14 274,741,666.05 52.00'" 1972. . 29,121,822.55 139,916,957.72 42,926,714.32 7,185,241.73 2,468,060.99 29,547,936.36 8,079,746.19 4,034,907.19 263,281,387.05 48.54 1973. . 20,685,403.13 167,943,017.84 43,660,385.85 8,408,563.86 2,122,080.88 28,938,998.13 8,752,729.53 4,694,291.75 285,205,470.97 45.51 1974. . — — 182,014,114.04 48,117,255.90 9,044,241.71 2,632,779.03 39,599,556.93 9,587,104.50 5,018,099.74 296,013,151.85 40.85 1975. . 58,034,509.79 159,333,211.77 47,261,238.95 9,621,860.85 2,685,426.56 41,315,803.28 9,479,754.16 5,525,582.50 333,257,387.86 21.905'"' 1976. . 64,280,182.35 54,811,116.21 54,831,180.80 10,324,980.95 2,359,321.30 44,490,358.33 10,243,353.70 5,937,770.78 247,278,264.42 14.800 1977. . 69,045,570.16 150,885,663.97 52,377,303.52 11,295,063.94 2,881,135.42 46,412,167.82 9,461,111.08 6,660,127.37 349,018,143.28 19.386 1978. . 81,218,559.66 133,148,458.30 56,077,315.70 12,408,997.17 3,450,813.51 50,299,262.43 11,103,048.31 7,048,601.58 354,755,056.66 17.214 1979. . 102,835,149.83 119,260,168.28 61,609,848.79 14,214,463.58 3,772,201.69 51,825,914.56 12,311,186.28 10,196,977.82 376,025,910.83 17.074 1980. . 114,302,179.25 71,217,913.99 65,584,096.76 16,100,825.60 4,078,942.37 58,883,405.30 13,658,244.05 15,165,948.96 358,991,556.28 14.545 1981. . 134,157,399.12 82,119,456.30 73,457,707.96 18,452,550.14 7,615,853.70 64,819,683.32 15,182,076.33 22,732,699.97 418,537,426.84 9.266 1982. . 148,346,007.82 93,975,586.06 78,591,934.49 20,172,123.55 7,950,255.83 69,525,929.98 16,616,182.56 25,681,000.36 460,859,020.64 9.678 1983. . 165,730,595.86 138,096,227.40 90,622,565.65 22,106,431.95 8,704,806.63 76,240,505.66 18,216,332.88 27,996,003.07 547,713,469.10 9.74732 1984. . 178,955,453.16 119,036,971.26 93,669,037.71 23,902,372.95 9,190,480.78 83,037,068.16 19,627,063.73 30,606,700.45 558,025,148.20 10.36127 ' Arithmetical Average "" Assessment Ratio Changed from 25% to 50% ""'Assessment Ratio Changed from 50% to 100% DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS / inn A 1�v.CJ -I rums". It1 JJVVl I I 1()'1• Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed INCREASE Tax Value Value Value Value Value or Year Land % Improvements % State Pub.Serv. % Personal % ALL DECREASE 1965. . $ 420,694,010 25.94 $ 777,248,200 47.92 $ 91.168,210 5.62 $ 332,853,197 20.52 $ 1,621,963,617 $ 88,547,966 1966. . 462,250,780 27.56 806,876,350 48.12 93,216,505 5.55 314,591,271 18.77 1,676,934,906 54,971,289 1967. . 493,649,395 26.27 860,288,950 46.47 95,531,428 5.10 401.635,290 21.70 1,851,105,063 174,170,157 1968. . 528,495,261 26.22 936,459,499 46.47 93,944,631 4.66 456,225,275 22.65 2,015,124,666 1,264,019,603 1969. . 575,816,750 25.25 1,044,571,780 45.80 103,581,280 4.54 556,860,017 24.41 2,280,829,827 265,705,161 1970. . 623,170,488 25.05 1,133,292,098 45.56 ' 112,051,603 4.51 618,859,325 24.88 2,487,373,514 206,543,687 25 1971•. . 1,356,050,320 25.67 2,483,914,152 47.01 251,604,684 4.76 1,191,771,275 22.56 5,283,340,413 2,795,966,899 1972. . 1,454,347.126' 26.81 2,528,786,027" 46.62 242,435.483"" 4.47 1,198,786,325t 22.10 5,424,354,961 1,241,014,548 1973. . 1,915,840,018' 30.57 3,093,909,141• 49.37 320,308,202"• 5.11 936,463,320t 124.95 6,266,520,681 842,165,720 1974. . 2,306,312,158' 31.82 3,526,539,747" 48.66 370,100,854" 5.11 1,043,709,310t 124.40 7,246,662,069 980,141,388 1975. . 4,556,585,580' 30.04 7,557,637,084' 49.83 769,027,933'• 5,07 2,284,254,050t 125.06 15,167,504,647 7,920,842,578 1976. . 4,618,993,488' 27.65 8,551,406,267' 51.18 828,827,010"• 4.96 2,708,485,118t 126.21 16,707,711,883 1,540,207,236 1977. . 4,874,959,564" 27.08 9,251,379,620* 51.39 947,889,542*• 5.26 2,929,542,062t 126.27 18,003,770,788 1,296,058,905 1978. . 5,490,088,538" 26.64 10,885,320,630" 52.82 1,009,715,138'• 4.90 3,223,877,951 t 125.64 20,609,002,257 2,605,231,469 1979. . 5,534,540,060' 25.17 11,776,058,349' 53.54 1,108,584,892" 5.04 3,574,682,670t 16.25 21,993,865,971 1,384,863,714 1980. . 5,907,591,805* 23.96 13,219,999,510' 53.62 1,214,545,922'• 4.93 4,311,016,410t 17.49 24,653,173,647 2,659,307,676 1981. . 13,006,655,888' 28.60 25,626,363.863" 56.36 1,409,164,399'• 3.10 5,429,291,310t 11.94 45,471,475,460 20,818,301,813 1982. . 13,034,989,762• 27.18 26,808,087,878* 55.91 1,624,614,181"• 3.39 6,483,149,030t 13.52 47,950,840,851 2,479,364,391 :d2,obz,,i9t.?,-?A A` 1983. . 18,866,199,234' 33.39 28-992,325"" 50.54 1,779,739,763"• 3.15 7,300,262,962t 12.92 56,508,598,284 8,557,757,433 1984. . 18,894,168,685' 34.84 29,502,850,081' 54.41 1,895,578,716" 3.50 3,932,330,467 t 7.25 54,224,927,949 -2,283,670,335 • Includes Omitted Assessments "" Includes Boats t Includes Boats and Omitted Assessments PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF OF OF PROPERTY TAXES PROPERTY TAXES PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED IN LEVIED IN LEVIED IN KING COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES UNINCORPORATED AREAS 32.07% 32.8 4% 30.58% 21.33% STATE 20.80% STATE 22.36% STATE LOCAL SCHOOL LOCAL SCHOOL LOCAL SCHOOL ° SCHOOL SUPPORT 0.61 /o SCHOOL SUPPORT 0.09°/o SCHOOL SUPPORT 3.52% SUPPORT 4.28% HOSPITAL SUPPORT FIRE SUPPORT 482% PORT ROAD _� LIBRARY 9.57 FIRE o '0 25.43% 0 14J 4 6.79 /0 14.88` 1.35 /0 15.26 MUNICIPAL /° 3.61 % ° 12.61% COUNTY 26 o MUNICIPAL COUNTY 1.64% EMERGENCY COUNTY 3.34 /o 126% 3.31 /o LIBRARY MEDICAL PORT PORT ROAD FIRE EMERGENCY % SERVICES 0.85 MEDICAL 1.32% HOSPITAL SERVICES EMERGENCY 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% MEDICAL WATER,CEMETERY, WATER,LIBRARY, 1.31% WATER,CEMETERY SERVICES SEWER,FLOOD ZONES SEWER,FLOOD ZONES HOSPITAL SEW ER,FLOOD ZONES Tax Dollars Tax Dollars Tax Dollars State School Suport $178,955,453 Municipal $ 93,669,038 State School Suport $ 57,984,071 Municipal 93,669,038 State School Support 120,971,382 Local School Support 42,394,844 Local School Support 119,036,971 Local School Support 76,642,127 King County 26,810,957 King County 83,037,068 King County 56,226,111 Road 23,902,373 Road 23,902,373 Emergency Medical Services 4,981,793 Emergency Medical Services 2 386,247 Port 19,627,064 Port 13,295,210 Port 6 331,854 Emergency Medical Services 7,368,040 Hospital 2,255,718 Hospital 2 491,165 Fire 18,458,474 Water 7,876 Water 216 Library 9,190,481 Fire 309,603 Fire 18,148,871 Hospital 4,746,883 Sewer — — Sewer — — Water 8,092 Library 54,109 Library 9,136,372 Cemetery 25,211 Flood Zone — — Cemetery 25,211 Sewer — — TOTAL $368,412,967 Flood Zones — — Flood Zone — — TOTAL $189,612,181 TOTAL $558,025,148 Computer Assisted Information Services The Department of Assessments is becoming a modern, computer- assisted unit of government. For a number of years the Department has been developing and refining a sophisticated computer program to carry on a continuing market analysis and review of all properties in King County. The analysis is made by comparing annual sales of ap- proximately 35,000 to 40,000 homes with other comparable proper- ties. In recent months the Department started making available to the public a computer-generated report listing sales of comparable proper- ties by neighborhood. Later this year the microfiche system, used to record and display data on appraisal/sales histories and property characteristics, will be replaced by a more up-to-date, on-line com- puter system. People who are seeking information on properties will be able to "punch up" the properties on easy-to-use computer ter- minals that will make it faster and simpler to make inquiries regarding property characteristics. Soon, with the cooperation of other units of King County government, the Assessor's maps also may be computer-produced. Appeals Coordination The Department is also working hard to improve its coordination with A REPORT ON PROGRESS the King County Board of Equalization. When appropriate, the depart- ment now supports the entry of multi-year valuation change orders in- 27 stead of only single year orders.This should help to end valuation fluc- tuations, or the "yo-yo" effect, in which some taxpayers who suc- cessfully appeal a property valuation experience its almost immediate return to the same or higher levels the next year. Administration and Personnel Development The King County Assessor is responsible for appraising all real and per- sonal property to establish a value upon which the various taxing bodies such as county, cities, schools, roads, fire protection districts, etc., levy taxes. To carry out this task, she manages the Department of Assessments, consisting of four major divisions totaling 255 full- time staff positions. The present staff level represents a decrease of three positions from 1983 due to efficiencies in the Personal Property Division and the Assessor's administrative office. Affirmative action and career development for all employees are hallmarks of the Assessor's personnel policies. The advancement and morale of the department's professional,technical,administrative and support staff is in part dependent on the ongoing training and promo- tional opportunities they receive. A lack of such options has been most obvious for women and minorities, who are underrepresented among middle and upper level positions. The Assessor is addressing these needs by increasing training and internal promotion oppor- tunities for all staff, and by reaching out to all communities in recruit- ment. MARKET TRENDS The volume of real estate sales reversed its decline in 1983, possibly reflecting impatience on the part of sellers, lower interest rates for fixed-rate long-term mortgages, and the growing use of alternatives to traditional fixed-rate long-term mortgages. Real estate prices for residential property showed small declines in many areas, although market growth continued in the more expensive residential properties. KING COUNTY REAL ESTATE SALES (1% EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVITS FILED) (000) 65 64 315 28 63 326 61 609 60 55 50 46 197 46 547 45 42 098 40 37,410 35 0 1977 19 78 19 79 1980 1981 1982 19 83 ASSESSED VALUE - NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENTS STAFFING LEVEL IS MILLIONS) 1600 1496.E 7 300 4 1400 1190.8 275 200- 265 264 254 258 255 1000- 998.4 918.1 250 - 800 - 600- 225 - 400 - 200 - 200 - 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 29 TAXES BILLED ASSESSED VALUE ($ MILLIONS) IS MILLIONS) 700 60 56.469 54.224 600 50 47.951 547.7 558.0 45.472 500 40 460.8 418.5 400 30 359.0 24.653 300 20 , 0 0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 Procedures and Timeliness set by Washington State Law or most practical method. All property (other than new construction and mobile homes subject to their first assessment) is subject to assessment and taxation on the first day of January in each year. (RCW 84.36.005 and RCW 84.40.020) Preliminary Assessment Work by Assessor to Begin not later than December 1, for collections in the second year following (RCW 84.40.040) Lien of Taxes: Real Property — The taxes assessed upon real property and mobile homes shall be a lien thereon from and including the first day of January in the year in which they are levied. (RCW 84.60.020) IMPORTANT DATES Personal Property — The taxes assessed upon personal property shall be a lien thereon from and after the date upon which such prop- RELATING TO erty is listed and valued by the County Assessor. (RCW 84.60.020) 30 PROPERTY ASSESSMENT Taxes Payable to King County Finance Director February 15,—based ANDTAXATION on assessed values and tax levies of the preceeding year. First half taxes due by April 30, or entire year's tax becomes delinquent. Se- cond half tax becomes delinquent after October 31 . When total tax is $10.00 or less, entire amount must be paid by April 30. (RCW 84.56.020) Taxing District Boundary Changes resulting from annexations, mergers, incorporations, etc., must be certified by the King County Council to the King County Assessor by March 1 for proper assign- ment of assessed values in the current assessment year. (RCW 84.09.030) Personal Property — Filing of Affadavit Refer to pages 1 and 3 for definitions of Personal Property, determina- tion of value and affidavit procedure. Deadline for filing of affidavits without penalty is March 31 of the assessment year. (RCW 84.40.040) Assessment Roll Listing — Real and Personal Properties to be corn- Certification of state property tax levy to the County Assessor: Within oleted by County Assessor on or before May 31, except for new con- three days after receipt of the proceedings of the State Board of struction (RCW 84.40.040) Equalization. (RCW 84.48.110) June Meeting of County Board of Equalization: errors in description, Equalized assessed value of public utility property certified to the double assessments, etc., submitted by the County Comptroller. County Assessor by the Department of Revenue upon receipt from the (RCW 84.56.400) State Board of Equalization(normally in September).(RCW 84.12.370) Assessment Roll Certified by County Assessor to County Board of Equalization: First Monday in July. (RCW 84.40.320) Assessor Certifies Assessed Value to Taxing Districts: After receipt and distribution of public utility and private car company values from County Board of Equalization Convenes for not less than three days Department of Revenue — usually by September 20. (RCW nor more than four weeks, beginning the first Monday in July. (RCW 84.48.130) 84.48.010) Budgets Filed with Clerk of County Council: By first class cities under Taxpayer Appeals Protesting Assessed Valuation of Real Property to 300,000 population, second and third class cities, port districts and be filed with County Board of Equalization by July 15. Review page 6 first class school districts, etc., on or before the Wednesday next for appeals procedure and available assistance. (WAC 458.14.120) following first Monday in October. (RCW 84.52.020) 3 Assessment Roll Listing: New construction to be completed by county Levies Certified to County Assessor: By County Council, City Councils Assessor on or before August 31. (RCW 36.21.080) of first class cities having more than 300,000 population, (fourth class towns and other taxing districts having authority to levy taxes Appeals from County Board of Equalization: If a taxpayer wishes to directly), on or before second Monday in October. (RCW 84.52.070) appeal a decision of the County Board, he or she may appeal for review by the State Board of Tax Appeals. Taxpayer appeals must be November Meeting of County Board of Equalization: Errors in descrip- filed with the Clerk of the County Council within thirty days of County tion, double assessments, etc., submitted by Assessor third Monday Board action. (RCW 84.08.130) in November. (RCW 84.52.090) Department of Revenue shall equalize taxes authorized by law during Assessor Certifies Tax Rolls to County Finance Director: On or before the month of August. (RCW 84.48.080) December 15. (Copy to county Auditor). (RCW 84.52.080) Certification of Public Utility and Private Car Company Valuations: To Abstract of Tax Rolls to State Auditor by County Assessor: On or County Assessors by the State Department of Revenue after deter- before January 15. (RCW 84.48.070) mination by the State Board of Equalization. (RCW 84.16.130) Historical Summary of the Property Tax in Washington State Early History - 1853: U.S. Organic Act established territorial govern- 1965 - 47th Amendment to the state constitution, allowing for ment; all taxes to be assessed uniformly; exemption for property of senior citizen property exemption. the United States and for churches and benevolent institutions. 1886: Revenue producing property of churches is taxable. 1889: 1967 - Senior citizens exempt from first $50.00 of real property State Constitution adopted — property to be assessed at 50% of tax. Barlow vs. Kinnear provided the state with assessment equaliza- true and fair value, (Legislature may grant exemptions). 1900: $300 tion power. of personal property per household exempt. 1925: Exemptions for private schools and colleges. 1968 - 53rd Amendment to the state constitution provided current use assessment for open space, timber and agricultural land. 1929 - 14th Amendment to the state constitution; classification of property is allowed with all real estate being one class; all taxes to be 1969 - State sponsored revaluation plan instituted to make the uniform upon the same class of property within the boundaries of the 1955 revaluation act fully effective. Carkonen vs. Williams man- taxing authority levying the tax. dated a 50% assessment ratio (ratio of assessment value to market value). Yield tax on reforestation lands and on mines permitted, (effective 32 1931). 1970 - Open Space Law, (53rd Amendment to the state constitu- tion), implemented. Leases of public land subject to assessment. 1931 - Intangibles exempt from the property tax. 1971 - $50.00 senior citizen exemption replaced by exemption 1932 - Initiative imposed a 40 mill limit on combined regular levies from special levies. ($4,000 and under income qualification for of all taxing districts with property assessed at 50% of value. 100% exemption; $4,000 to $6,000 income for 50% exemption). Annual increase in regular levies of local taxing districts limited to Redd Case limited state authority over local assessments. 6% over the largest regular levy of three previous years, (effective 1974 collections). Annual updating of property values permitted. 1935 - Revenue Act: exemption for all household goods and per- Standing timber exempt from the property tax and an excise tax bas- sonal effects. ed on stumpage value imposed to replace this revenue source. Ex- panded exemption for facilities of private schools. 1937 - On-highway motor vehicles exempt from property taxes. Ex- cise Tax (1.5% of value) on-highway motor vehicles adopted. Interest on delinquent property taxes: lowered from 10% to 5% per annum up to $500, 10% on balance; or, if first half paid timely, (by 1943 - House trailers exempt from the property tax and are made April 30th), and second half becomes delinquent, (after October subject to the 1.5% motor vehicles excise tax. 31st), interest rate is 10% per annum. 1944 - 17th Amendment added the 40 mill limit to the state con- 1972 - Residential improvements up to 30% of value exempt from stitution. property taxation for three years. Approval of SJR1 constitutionally limiting all regular levies to 1 % of proeprty value, ($10.00 per 1955 - Property revaluation cycle established — 4 year interval. $1,000.00 of assessed value). Removal of 40% voter turnout re- quirement for special levies — (60% majority requirement for ap- 1961 - Freeport exemption for goods in transit granted. proval retained). 1973 -Assessment level increased from 50%to 100%of true and regular levies on the first$15,000 value of the residence. Regular fair value, for 1974 collection. SJR1 effective for 1974 taxes levy of $.25 per $1,000.00 assessed value authorized for (Hoppe vs. Kinnear): 20 mill maximum for regular levies-with no emergency medical services - (six year voter opproved regular state levy. Current use assessment of farm land based on net levy). cash rental value. Permanently affixed mobile homes exempt from excise tax and returned to the property tax. 1980 -Senior citizen exemption changes set:one-third exclusion for Social Security income eliminated, but qualifying income 1974 -Phase-out of property tax on inventories begun, (10% per levels increased by $3,000. Exemption for added value of year, accomplished thru annually increasing B &O tax credits)- unconventional energy systems authorized (thru 1987) -also for complete phase-out by 1984. Eight percent delinquency rate gasohol manufacturing facilities. established. Fire district service charged approved - to be proportional to benefits conferred by the district; aggregate 1981 - Interest rate on delinquent property taxes, with exception charges limited to 60% of the district operating budget for the of senior citizen deferred taxes, increased from 8% to 12%, year the charge is imposed, and must be approved by a 60% (effective 7/26/81). New penalty of 11% for first year majority of the districts voters. Special levy exemption for senior delinquencies, starting in 1982. Foreclosure period shortened citizens increased; income qualifications revised to: up to$5,000 from 5 years to 3 years, (effective May, 1983). Exemption for non- - 100%exemption, $5,000to$6,000-50%exemption,up to$4,000 profit musical and artistic organizations and public assembly - exempt from regular and special levies on first $5,000 of halls inaugurated. Valuation reduction approved for property residence value. involved in natural disaster damage - no longer necessary to make application. Levy allowed for park and recreation service 3: 1975 - 100% assessment ratio implemented and statutory rate areas. limit reduced to $9.15 per $1,000 assessed value, (legislature set maximum at $10.00 per 1,000 A.V.then in allocating the reduced 1983 - Elimination of business inventories from property tax assess- rate, cut maximum rates of certain district categories by an ment rolls, effective in 1983 for 1984 collections. additional 10%). Deferral of property taxes and special 1984 - Legal requirements for payment of penalties and interest on assessments allowed for senior citizens with income of less than delinquent taxes relaxed. Interest and penalties may now be paid on $8,000 - (income to be adjusted annually based on CPI). "first half' taxes without affecting amount and due date of "2nd 1976 - Approval of state constitutional amendment permitting half' payments. school districts to seek voter approval of special levies for two Senior Citizen exemption qualifications modifed: Households with years at the same election. $15,000 annual income or less exempt from all special levies. Those 1977 - Court ordered phase in of special levy limitation and full with incomes of $12,000 or less exempt from all special levies, plus state funding of basic education initiated - to be fully effective $20,000 of the property assessed value exempt from all property with 1981 levies. Senior citizen exemption qualifying income taxes. levels increased by $2,000. Property tax exemption for solar Qualification requirements for property tax deferral will be the same energy facilities approved -expired upon adoption of exemption as for senior citizen/disabled persons tax exemption. for added value of unconventional energy systems in 1980. Annual filing for senior citizen/disabled citizen property tax exemp- 1979 -State levy for common schools placed under provisions of tions no longer required, as long as applicant remains qualified. (Ef 106% limitation law. Senior citizen exemption increased again: fective with applications for 1986 exemption). households with income to $11,000 exempt from all special levies; in addition, those with income to $7,000 exempt from INFORMATION / ASSISTANCE PHONE NUMBERS King County King County Department of Assessments Office of Finance (TAXES) Public Information 344-7304 Real Estate/Property Tax Information 344-3850 Property Values, Appraisal Help, Personal Property Tax Information 344-4290 Comparable Sales, Legal Descriptions . . . . 344-7304 Name and Address Change 344-2679 Personal Property 344-3914 Local Improvement District Records 344-3913 Senior Citizen and Property Tax Refunds 344-3413 Disability Exemptions 344- 4120 Senior Citizen and Property Tax Foreclosures 344-4184 Disability Deferrals 344- 4091 Excise Tax (see Records and Elections) Home Improvement and Director's Office 344-2626 Destroyed Property Exemptions 344- 4091 Non-Profit Organizations 344- 4091 34 Open Space 344 4169 King County Property Tax Advisor Assessor's Office 344-2630 Property Valuation Questions and Property Tax Information (see Office of Finance) Appeals Counseling 344-5202 King County King County Records and Elections Division Board of Equalization General Information 344-2562 Property Valuation Appeals 344-3496 Real Estate Excise Tax 344-3873 Plats, Condos and Surveys 344-4045 Washington State Board of Tax Appeals Property Valuation Appeals(Olympia) 753-5446 64144- /1 451 DPTE 5-7-84 INTRODUCED BY Bruce Laing 1 PROPOSED NUMBER 84-328 2 3 ORDINANCE NO . 6899 4 AN ORDINANCE relating to Forward Thrust Arterials, amending King County Resolution 5 34569 as requested the City of Renton' s 6 Resolution No. 2522, as previously amended by Ordinances No. 433, 586 , 842, 843, 959, 974, 987, 988, 1016, 1218, 1236, 1244, 1293 , 1414, 7 1613 , 1614, 1629, 2263 , 2296, 2358, 2721 , 2776 , 3310, 4212, 4482, 4483 , 4484, 4503, 5112, 5454, 8 and 6262. 9 PREAMBLE: 10 King County Resolution No. 34569 (hereinafter "Resolution" ) was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (now the 11 King County council under the King County Charter) on December 18, 1967 and is commonly referred to as the Forward 12 Thrust Arterial Highway Improvement Bond Resolution. 13 This Resolution was approved by the voters of King County on the 13th day of February, 1968. The voters authorized the 14 issuance of General Obligation Bonds for the purpose of improving existing public arterial highway facilities all 15 within King County by the various cities and towns in King 16 County. 17 Arterial highway facilities as contemplated by the Resolution and defined therein mean public roads lawfully designated as arterials by the State of Washington and other 18 appropriate governmental agencies . Projects described in 19 Section 3 of the Resolution assigned to the city of Renton provides that no projects are limited solely to the facili- ties listed and the funds are available for additional 20 - arterial highway facilities . 21 Paragraph FF of Section 3 of the Resolution provides for improvement of traffic control signals and street lighting 22 served by underground wiring to be done within the incor- 23 porated limits of cities other than the City of Seattle. 24 Section 6 of the Resolution provides in part that if all projects which the local governmental agency has been 25 authorized to accomplish have been completed or completion duly provided for, or their completion found to be imprac- 26 tical , such excess bond proceeds may be applied to carry out such other public arterial highway facilities purposes within the territory limits of the agency as may be deter- mined by the legislative authority thereof and found by the 28 board of county commissioners to be consistent with the pur- poses of the Resolution and to be a county purpose. 29 The City of Renton on August 1 , 1983 enacted Resolution No. 30 2522 which Resolution finds that there is a need to amend or modify the street project list in King County Resolution 31 32 - 1 - 33 6S99 1 34569 Section 3-Y consistent with the provisions of Sections 5 and 6 of that Resolution to-wit: 2 ////// 1 . N.E . 4th Street from Monroe Avenue N.E. to Union Avenue 3 N.E. 4 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 5 NEW SECTION. SECTION 1 . CONCLUSIONS . The King County coun- 6 cil finds that the project described in the City of Renton 7 Resolution No. 2522 is determined to be consistent with the pur- 8 poses of Resolution 34569 and is a county purpose. 9 Resolution No. 2522 of the City of Renton, and the letter and 10 attachments from the Renton Director of Public Works are attached 11 hereto and made a part of this ordinance. 12 Based upon these conclusions the council hereby determines 13 additional surplus bond proceeds are available to the City of 14 Rerton and further the council determines that the additional pro- 15 ject can be accomplished which is consistent with Resolution 34569 16 for a county purpose and therefore it is hereby specified, 17 ratified and approved to expend such bond proceeds upon the 18 following new designated project. 19 Renton: 20 1 . N.E. 4th Street from Monroe Avenue N.E. to Union Avenue N.E. 21 Subject to the provisions of this Resolution, the plan for the 22 acquisition, construction, development and improvement of public 23 arterial highway facilities generally described in this section is 24 hereby adopted and shall be carried out by the designated govern- 25 mental agency set forth for each project. No project shall be 26 limited solely to the facilities or work listed in such general 27 description and if funds are available for additional arterial 28 highway facilities they may be used therefor. 29 SECTION 2 . Resolution No. 34569, Section 3 is hereby amended 30 to read as follows: 31 32 - 2 - 33 6899 A. City of Algona $ 24, 960 2 ( 1 ) First Ave. From Pacific Ave. to West Valley Highway. 3 ( 2 ) Main Street from First Ave. to West 4 Valley Highway. 5 ( 3 ) Milwaukee Ave. from First Ave. to South City limits . 6 ( 4) Pacific Ave. from First Ave. to South 7 City limits. 8 B. City of Auburn $907,968 9 • (as amended by Ordinance Nos. 586, 1613, 4212, and 5454 ) 10 ( 1) "C" St. S.W. from 3rd. St. S.W. to 11 West Main. 12 ( 2 ) 1st St. N.E. and N.W. from "A" St. N.W. to "E" St. N.E. 13 ( 3) 4th St. N.E. from "C" St. N.E. to "M" St. N.E. 14 ( 4 ) 4th St. S.E. from "D" St. S.E. to "M" 15 St. S.E. 16 ( 5) 12th St. S.E. from "A" St. S.E. to "M" St. S.E. 17 ( 6 ) 21st St. S.E. from "A" St. S.E. to "R" 18 St. S .E. 19 ( 7 ) 37th St. N.E. and N.W. from West Valley Highway to East Valley Highway. 20 ( 8 ) "A" St. S.W. and N.W. from 3rd St. S.W. 21 to 15th St. N.W. 22 ( 9) "E" St. S.E. from 4th St. S.E. to 4th St. N.E. 23 ( 10) Howard Road from PSH No. 5 to 21st St. 24 S.E. 25 ( 11) "R" St. S.E. from 17th St. S.E. to 21st St. S.E. 26 ( 12) 2nd St. S.W. and S.E. from "A" St . S.W. 27 to "E" St. S.E. 28 ( 13) 15th St. N.W. and N.E. from East Valley Highway to West Valley Highway. 29 ( 14 ) 17th St. S.E. from PSH No. 5 to "R" St. 30 S .E. 31 ( 15) Howard Road from "R" St. S.E. to PSH No. 5. 32 - 3 - 33 MRI^;.T"'q�.?' ^7"li 't r -.^'—rt^T�ran+�-T�' w-w}e"^"^^ n'T�� ..aT++.-.'w�T:+-�►e�^+^r _ it • 6899 (16) 29th St. S.E. from "A" St. S.E. to "R" St. S.E. 2 3 ( 17) Main Street from West Valley Highway to Auburn Avenue (by Ordinance No. 586) 4 (18) "A" Street N.W. from Main Street to First Street N.W. (by Ordinance No. 4212) 5 6 ( 19 ) 22nd N.E. from Auburn Way North to "M" St. N.E. (by Ordinance No. 5454) 7 ( 20). Ellingson Road from "A" Street to "C" Street S.W. 8 within the Auburn City Limits (by Ordinance No. 1613) 9 ( 21 ) Division Street from Main Street to First Street 10 N.W. (by Ordinance No. 4212) 11 ( 22) Main Street from "A" Street N.W. to Division Street (by Ordinance No. 4212) 12 ( 23) First Street N.W. from "A" Street N.W. to Division 13 Street (by Ordinance No. 4212) 14 ( 24 ) E. Main Street from Auburn Way North to "N" Street N.E. (by Ordinance No. 4212) 15 ( 25) "A" Street S.E. from E . Main to South Auburn City . 16 Limits (by Ordinance No. 4212) 17 C. City of Bellevue $1 , 483 ,584 (amended by Ordinance No. 2296) 18 ( 1 ) Bellevue-Redmond Rd. from 250 ft. east 19 of 124th Ave. N.E. to 164th Ave. N.E. 20 • ( 2) S.E. 8th St. from Wilburton Interchange to 140th Ave. S.E. 21 ( 3 ) S .E. 8th St. from 112th Ave. S.E. to 22 Wilburton Interchange. 23 ( 4 ) 112th Ave. S.E. from Lake Washington Boulevard to S.E. 8th St. 24 ( 5) Richards Road from S.E. 26th St. to 25 • S.E. 8th St. 26 ( 6) 116th Ave. N.E. and S.E. from S.E. 8th to N.E. 8th St. 27 ( 7) 148th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 8th St. 28 to N.E. 24th St. 29 ( 8 ) N.E. 21st St. from 112th Ave. N.E. to 124th Ave. N.E. 30 ( 9) N.E. 24th St. from 108th Ave. N.E. to 31 112th Ave. N.E. 32 - 4 - 33 6 8 D 9 ( 10 ) Northeast 8th Street, from 100th Ave . N.E. to 2 112th Ave. N.E. 3 D . Town of Black Diamond $ 14 , 400 4 ( 1 ) Improve existing arterials as necessary. 5 E . Town of Beaux Arts Village $ 2, 000 6 ( 1 ) Arterial portions of S .E. 104th St . , 28th St. and S.E. 105th St. within the 7 town limits . 8 F . City of Bothell $187 , 056 (amended by Ordinance 1244) 9 ( 1 ) Waynita Way ( 100th Ave. N.E. ) from N.E. 10 145th St. to Bothell Way. 11 ( 2 ) Pine St. from 104th to 108th. 12 ( 3 ) Willow St. from 104th to Ross Road and Ross Road from Willow St. to freeway 13 connection. 14 ( 4 ) N .E. 205th St . from 104th N.E. to 112th N.E. 15 ( 5) 92nd Ave. N.E. from N.E. 180th St . 16 southerly to Tolt Water Main. 17 ( 6 ) 100th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 190th to N .E. 195th, N.E. 195th St. from 100th N.E. 18 to 104th N.E . , 104th Ave N.E. from N.E. 195th to N.E. 200th. 19 ( 7 ) Main Street from Bothell Way N.E. to 104th 20 Ave. N.E. 21 G . Town of Carnation $ 11 , 616 22 ( 1 ) Morrison, Rutherford, Commercial, Bird, Enthwhistle , Blanche , Myrtle and Eugene 23 Streets between north city limits and south city limits. 24 H . Town of Clyde Hill $129 , 600 25 ( amended by Ordinance Nos. 2263, 4503 and 6262) 26 ( 1 ) E . 1/2 of 84th Ave. N.E. from Evergreen Pt. Bridge Freeway to N.E. 12th St. 27 ( 2 ) N. 1/2 of N.E. 12th St . from 84th Ave. 28 N.E. to 86th Ave. N.E. 29 ( 3 ) N.E. 28th St . from 84th Ave . N.E. to 92nd Ave. N.E. 30 ( 4 ) E. 1/2 Points Drive from N .E. 28th St. 31 to Evergreen Pt. Bridge Freeway. 32 33 - 5 - 6E399 ( 5 ) 98th Ave . N.E. from 13th St. to 34th St. (by Ordinance No. 2263) 2 ( 6 ) 96th Ave . N.E. from 24th St. to 34th St. 3 (by Ordinance No. 2263) 4 ( 7 ) 92nd Ave. N.E. from N.E. 12th St . to Points Drive (by Ordinance No. 4503) 5 6 ( 8 ) N .E . 24th St . from 84th Ave. N.E. to 98th Ave . N.E . (by Ordinance No. 4503) ( 9 ) N .E . 14th St . from 98th Ave . N. E. to 92nd 8 Ave. N. E. 9 I , City of Des Moines $162 , 528 10 ( 1 ) S . 216th St. from Highway 99 to Des Moines Way. 11 ( 2 ) S . 223rd St. from Highway 99 to Cliff 12 Ave. 13 ( 3 ) 16th Ave . S. from S . 220th St. to Kent- Des Moines Rd. 14 ( 4 ) S . 222nd St . from Highway 99 to 5th 15 Ave. S. 16 ( 5 ) 24th Ave. S. from S . 216th St. to Kent- Des Moines Rd. 17 ( 6 ) 7th Ave. S. from S . 218th St. to S. 227th 18 St. 19 J. Town of Duvall $ 8, 400 20 ( 1 ) Improve existing arterials as necessary. 21 K. City of Enumclaw $134 , 112 22 (amended by Ordinance No. 2721 ) 23 ( 1 ) Roosevelt Ave . from SR 410 to Cole St. 24 ( 2 ) Florence St. from Kibler Ave. to Griffin Ave. 25 ( 3 ) Cole St. from Washington Ave. northerly 26 ( 4) Kibler Ave. from Harding St. westerly 27 ( 5) Roosevelt Ave. from Cole St. westerly 28 ( 6 ) Forrelly St. from Roosevelt Ave. northerly 29 ( 7 ) McHugh Ave 30 ( 8 ) 252nd Ave. from Griffin Ave. to Roosevelt Ave. 31 32 - 6 - 33 Y I,�•.. '•" _+v-.roq r.�aT.-.^r.^,..^'^*s..^*�^."'�.'.tr' 'i'—Te.�*T - _- .3 4�l...'^^" T!y^nT'^S".-+. +►'rl'.s;a+v. `T r..+--.-.•..Cr_.+�-- 6S99 L. City of Houghton $139 , 248 2 ( 1 ) N.E. 60th St . from 108th Ave. N.E. to 124th Ave. N. E. 3 4 M . Town of Hunts Point $ 43 , 104 (amended by Ordinance No. 987) 5 ( 1 ) N. 1/2 of N.E. 28th St. from 84th Ave . 6 N.E. to 88th Ave. N.E. 7 ( 2 ) 84th Ave. N. E./Hunts Point Rd . 8 ( 3 ) Hunts Point Lane 9 ( 4 ) Hunts Point Circle 10 ( 5 ) Hunts Point Place 11 ( 6 ) Fairweather Place 12 ( 7) 80th Ave. N.E. , eastern half i3 J . City of Issaquah $132 , 624 (amended by Ordinance No. 2358 ) 14 ( 1 ) Rainier Way from State Primary Highway 15 10 to intersection with 10th Ave. 16 ( 2 ) Juniper St . from Rainier Way to west City limits. 17 ( 3 ) Front St. , from Sunset Way to the 18 south corporate limits. 19 C . City of Kent $905, 040 (amended by Ordinances No. 1293 and 2776 ) 20 - ( 1 ) Gowe St . from 6th Ave. to Central Ave. 21 ( 2) Gowe St . from State St. to Kennebeck St. 22 ( 3 ) Titus St. from Kennebeck St. to Smith St. 23 ( 4) 4th Ave. from S . 228th St. to S .212th St . 24 ( 5) Willis St . from 5th Ave . to Central Ave. 25 ( 6) 4th Ave. from Crow St. to Saar St. 26 ( 7 ) Reith Rd. from SSH 5-A ( SR 516 ) to 27 Military Rd. 28 ( 8 ) Military Rd. from SSH 5-A (SR 516 ) to S. 268th St. 29 ( 9 ) S . 240th St . from Pacific Highway S. to 30 Military Rd. 31 32 - 7 — 33 •.�-.r,-„ ;�r�c..-�.wrr..c '?"."**r - -v-.r....r�-.+w�.,-�,►_ ► _ ...,,T,r,,,,,��t-.r ••.w�qw+ .;....� _ „r tiy _ i ,�_ a f . 6;B9 ( 10 ) South 212th St. from East Valley Highway 2 ( 84th Ave. S. to 92nd Ave. S ) (by Ordinance No. 1293 ) 3 ( 11 ) East Valley Highway ( 84th Ave . S . ) from S . 228th 4 St. to S . 212th St . (by Ordinance No. 1293 ) 5 ( 12 ) East Valley Highway (Central Ave . ) from Willis St. to the Green River (by Ordinance No. 1293 ) 6 ( 13 ) South 180th Street from West Valley Highway to 7 East Valley Highway (by Ordinance No. 2776 ) 8 ( 14 ) West Smith St. from Central Ave. to North Fourth Avenue (by Ordinance No. 2776 ) 9 P. City of Kirkland $321 , 120 10 ( amended by Ordinance No. 842 and 4482) 11 ( 1 ) Market St . from 9th Ave. to N.E. 106th St . 12 ( 2 ) N.E. 68th St. ( 1/2) from 102nd Ave. N.E. to SH 405. 13 ( 3 ) 6th St. S. from N.E. 68th St . to 9th Ave. S. 14 ( 4 ) 9th Ave. S. from 6th St. S . to 10th St. S . 15 ( 5 ) 10th St . S. from 9th Ave. S. to Kirkland Way. 16 ( 6) Kirkland Way from 10th St. S . to SSH 901 . 17 ( 7 ) 3rd St. from Central Way to 18th Ave . 18 ( 8 ) 6th St. from 7th Ave. to 15th Ave . 19 ( 9 ) 7th Ave. from Market St. to N.P.R.R. 20 - ( 10 ) 6th St. from Central Way to Kirkland Ave . 21 ( 11 ) Kirkland Ave. from 6th St. to 6th St. S. 22 ( 12) Kirkland Way from Kirkland Ave. to Central 23 Way. 24 ( 13 ) 6th St. from 15th Ave. to N.E. 106th St. 25 (14) 8th St. from 7th Ave. to N.E. 106th P1. 26 ( 15 ) 18th Ave. from Market St. to 116th Ave. N.E. 27 ( 16 ) Central Way from Market St. to Highway 405 (by Ordinance No. 842 ) 28 ( 17) Lake Washington Boulevard N.E . (Lake St. South ) 29 from Central Way to south City Limits (by Ordinance No. 842) 30 ( 18 ) Market St. from Central Way to N.E. 124th St. 31 (by Ordinance No. 842) • 32 33 - 8 - 63D9 ( 19 ) Lakeview Drive - Lake Washington Boulevard to State ' t . (by Ordinance No. 4482) 2 3 Q. City of Lake Forest Park $ 97 , 936 4 ( 1 ) 40th Pl. N. E. from SSH 2B to north City limits . 5 ( 2 ) 178th St . N.E . from 47th Ave . N.E . to 6 east City limits. R. City of Medina $172 ,464 7 (amended by Ordinance No. 1414 , 4483 and 5112) 8 (1 ) W. 1/2 of 84th Ave. N.E . from Evergreen 9 Pt . Bridge Freeway to N. E. 12th St. 10 ( 2 ) S. 1/2 of N.E. 12th St. from 84th Ave. N. E. to 86th Ave. N.E. 11 ( 3 ) Lake Washington Blvd . from N .E . 10th to 12 N.E. 12th St. 13 ( 4 ) N.E. 8th St. from Evergreen Point Rd. to 83rd Ave. N.E. Intersection (by Ordinance No. 1414 ) 14 ( 5 ) 82nd Ave . N.E. from 83rd Ave. N.E . and N.E. 8th 15 St . Intersection to 84th Ave . N.E. and N.E. 12th St. Intersection (by Ordinance No. 1414 ) 16 ( 6) Overlake Drive West and Overlake Drive East running 17 from Evergreen Point Road through/to Lake Washington Boulevard (by Ordinance No. 1414 ) 18 ( 7 ) 24th St . from 84th Ave. N.E . to 80th Ave . N.E. 19 (by Ordinance No. 4483 ) 20 ( 8 ) Overlake East from 84th Ave. N.E . to Lake Washington Boulevard (by Ordinance No. 4483 ) 21 ( 9 ) Evergreen Point Rd . from N.E. 12th, south 22 (by Ordinance No. 4483) 23 ( 10 ) 78th Place N.E . from N .E . 32nd to Evergreen Point Road in the City of Medina (by 24 Ordinance No. 5112) 25 S . City of Mercer Island $864 , 336 (amended by Ordinance Nos . 1614 and 4484 ) 26 ( 1 ) Island Crest Way - S.E. 53rd P1. to S.E. 27 68th St. 28 ( 2 ) S.E. 40th St. - W. Mercer Way to Island Crest Way. 29 ( 3) 78th Ave. S.E. - S.E. 34th St . to W. 30 Mercer Way. 31 32 - 9 - 33 0.99 ( 4 ) N. Mercer Way - 88th Ave. S.E . to 90th Ave. S.E. 2 ( 5 ) 84th Ave . S. E. - S. E. 24th St . to N. 3 Mercer Way. 4 ( 6 ) S. E. 24th St. - 77th Ave . S. E. to 84th Ave. S .E. 5 6 ( 7 ) N. Mercer Way - W. Mercer Way to S.E. 22nd St. 7 ( 8 ) W. Mercer Way - I-90 to N. Mercer Way. 8 ( 9 ) Gallager Hill Rd. - S .E. 36th St. to 9 S. E. 40th St. 10 ( 10 ) S .E. 36th St . - Gallager Hill Rd. to Frontage Rd. 11 ( 11 ) W. Mercer Way - S .E. 24th St. to 12 S. E. 32nd St. 13 ( 12 ) S .E . 68th St . - 84th S .E. to Island Crest Way. 14 ( 13) 84th Ave. S.E . - S .E. 68th St. to 15 S.E. 72nd St. 16 ( 14 ) S .E. 72nd St . - W. Mercer Way to 84th Ave. S.E. 17 ( 15 ) S .E. 68th St . - Island Crest Way to 18 E. Mercer Way. 19 ( 16) Island Crest Way - S .E. 68th St. to 80th Ave. S.E. 20 ( 17 ) S .E. 40th St . - Island Crest Way to 92nd 21 Ave. S.E. (by Ordinance No. 1614 ) 22 ( 18 ) S .E. 40th St . - Island Crest Way to 92nd Ave . S.E. ( by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 23 ( 19) 76th Ave. S .E . - S .E. 24th St. to S.E. 28th St . 24 (by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 25 ( 20 ) S .E. 27th St . - 76th Ave. S .E. to 78th Ave. S .E . (by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 26 ( 21 ) 78th Ave. S .E. - S.E. 27th St. to S .E. 34th St . 27 (by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 28 ( 22 ) S .E. 28th St . - 78th Ave. S .E. to Island Crest Way (by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 29 ( 23 ) S .E. 32nd St . - 77th Ave. S . E. to 78th Ave. S.E . 30 (by Ordinance No. 4484 ) 31 32 - 10 - 33 _ter _ - -- • • 6899 ( 24 ) 77th Ave. S.E. - Sunset Highway to S.E. 32nd St. 2 (by Ordinance No. 4484) 3 ( 25) S.E. 29th St. - 76th Ave. S.E. to 78th Ave. S.E. (by Ordinance No. 4484) 4 ( 26 ) North Mercer Way - 76th Ave. S.E. to S.E. 27th St. (by Ordinance No. 4484) 6 T. City of Mercer Island $123,408 (amended by Ordinance No. 1218) 7 (1 ) 81st Ave. S.E. from southerly margin 8 Sunset Highway to south corporate limits. 9 ( 2) 80th Ave. S.E. from S .E. 28th St. to S.E. 32nd St. 10 ( 3 ) S.E. 32nd St. from 78th Ave. S.E. to 11 80th Ave. S.E. 12 ( 4 ) S.E. 30th St. from 78th Ave. S.E. to 81st Ave. S.E. 13 ( 5) S.E. 27th St. from 78th Ave. S.E. to 14 Sunset Highway. 15 ( 6) 78th Ave. S.E. from southerly margin Sunset Highway to S.E. 27th St. 16 ( 7 ) S.E. 24th St. from 76th Ave. S.E. to 17 82nd Ave. S.E. 18 ( 8) 76th Ave. S.E. from S.E. 28th St. to S.E. 29th St. 19 ( 9 ) 76th Ave. S.E. from S.E. 24th St. to 20 S.E. 22nd St. 21 (10) S.E. 22nd St. from N. Mercer Way to 76th Ave. S.E. 22 ( 11 ) 76th Ave. S.E. - S.E. 24th St. to S.E. 23 28th St. 24 ( 12) S.E. 27th St. - 76th Ave. S.E. to 78th Ave. S.E. 25 (13) 78th Ave. S.E. - S.E. 27th St. to S.E. 24th 26 St. 27 ( 14 ) S. E. 28th St. - 78th Ave. S.E. to Island Crest Way 28 (15) S.E. 32nd St. - 77th Ave. S.E. to 78th 29 Ave. S.E. 30 (16) 77th Ave. S.E. - Sunset Highway to S.E. 32nd St. 31 32 33 - 11 - ra f, -r •"" rie2‘ • • 6899 ( 17) S.E. 29th St. - 76th Ave. S.E. to 78th Ave. S.E. 2 ( 18 ) North Mercer Way - 76th Ave. S.E. to S.E. 3 27th St. 4 U. City of Normandy Park $158 ,784 5 ( 1 ) Shorebrook Dr. from Sylvester Rd. to 6 S.W. 174th St. ( 2) S.W. 175th P1. from Sylvester Rd. to S.W. 174th St. 8 ( 3) S.W. 175th St. from Sylvester Rd. to 9 S.W. 174th St. 10 (4 ) S.W. 173rd St. from Sylvester Rd. to S.W. 174th St. 11 ( 5) S.W. 174th St. from Shorebrook Dr. 12 to 1st Ave. S. 13 ( 6) 4th Ave. S.W. from Shorebrook Dr. to 1st Ave. S. 14 ( 7) S.W. 171st St. from Shorebrook Dr. 15 to 1st Ave. S. 16 ( 8) Marine View Dr. from Shorebrook Dr. to Fairway Dr. 17 ( 9) Marine View Dr. from Fairway Dr. to 18 S.W. 208th St. 19 (10 ) S.W. Normandy Dr. from Marine View Dr. to City Limits. 20 ( 11 ) Fairway Dr. from Marine View Dr. to 21 1st Ave. S. 22 (12) S.W. 200th St. from Marine View Dr. to 1st Ave. S. 23 (13) S.W. 170th St. from S.W. 168th St . 24 to Sylvester Rd. 25 (14) 12th P1. S.W. from S.W. 168th St. to Sylvester Rd. 26 (15) 19th Ave. S.W. from S.W. 168th St . 27 to Sylvester Rd. 28 ( 16) Shoremont Ave. from Marine View Dr. to Normandy Dr. 29 V. Town of North Bend $ 43,584 30 (amended by Ordinance No. 5113) 31 32 - 12 - 33 " `7,- ` W N. .47:v 7 7 4�y.. rt i. .,'7. -v,- T rPF 7 % 1 "7!".. • i,P.:+y'T,i .R 't / :mow YIS.�1 > .,f'' _ 6899 ( 1 ) Bendigo St . from 200 ft. south of N.P.R.R. right of way to S . Fork Bridge . 2 ( 2 ) Park Ave. from Bendigo St. to Main St. 3 ( 3 ) Main St . from Park Ave. to 1st Ave . 4 ( 4 ) Main St . from 1st Ave . to 4th Ave. 5 ( 5) UAB - Sixth St. Project 6 W. Town of Pacific $ 33 , 024 7 (amended by Ordinance No. 5454 ) 8 ( 1 ) 3rd Ave. S.W. and S.E . from West Valley Highway to Pacific Ave. 9 10 ( 2 ) Ellison Rd. from East Valley Highway to West Valley Highway 11 ( 3 ) Milwaukee Boulevard from 5th Ave . North to 12 5th Ave. 13 ( 4 ) Seattle Boulevard from 3rd Ave. S.W. to 5th Ave. S .W. 14 ( 5 ) Tacoma Boulevard from 5th Ave . S. to 5th 15 Ave. N. 16 ( 6 ) 2nd Ave. S.E. and S.W. from Seattle Boulevard South to Cedar Lane 17 ( 7 ) East Valley Highway from the North City Limits 18 to the South City Limits 19 ( 8 ) West Valley Highway from the North City Limits to the South City Limits. 20 X. City of Redmond $316, 512 21 (amended by Ordinance No. 433) 22 (1 ) 166th Ave . N.E. from N.E. 80th to N.E. 104th St. 23 ( 2 ) Bellevue-Redmond Rd. from N.E. 40th 24 St. to West Lake Sammamish Pky. N.E. 25 ( 3 ) 148th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 60th St. (south City Limits to Willows Rd. ) 26 ( 4 ) N.E. 104th St. from 132nd Ave. N.E. 27 to Avondale Rd. 28 ( 5 ) Redmond Way and Cleveland St . from N.P.R.R. Crossing to State Highway �9 sign route 901. 30 ( 6) N.E. 70th St . ( Collins Rd. ) from 134th Ave. N.E. to West Lake 31 Sammamish Pky. N.E. 32 - 13 - 33 t '01 -"7 7 , 'T � i5', +�},51:'q=�"• x aS,� "^"T '_ 77:77.. r-� ,f7.1 17..74► ;1-<d "l • r } Y ( � �J i t .. < c • 609 ( 7 ) N. E. 40th St. from 148th Ave . N.E. to West Lake Sammamish Pky. N.E. 2 3 ( 8 ) Leary Way and Gilman from West Lake Sammamish Pky. N. E. to Redmond Way. 4 ( 9 ) N.E . 24th St . from 172nd Ave . N.E. to 5 West Lake Sammamish Pky. N.E. 6 ( 10 ) 180th Ave. N.E. from West Lake Sammamish Pky. N.E. to N.E. 24th St . 7 ( 11 ) 156th Ave. N.E. from Bellevue-Redmond 8 Rd. to N.E. 51st St. 9 Y. City of Renton $3 , 345,840 (as amended by Ordinance Nos . 843 , 988 and 6262) 10 ( 1 ) N. 3rd and N. 4th St. one-way couplet from 11 Logan Ave. N. to Sunset Boulevard N. 12 ( 2 ) Rainier Ave. N. and S . from North City Limits to S . Grady Way. 13 ( 3 ) S.W. Grady Way from Rainier Avenue South 14 to West City Limits 15 ( 4 ) Park Avenue N. from Bronson Way N. to N. 8th St . 16 ( 5) Wells Ave. S . - Wells Ave. N. from S. Grady Way to N. 6th St. 17 ( 6 ) North 6th St . from Logan Ave . N. to Garden 18 Ave. N. 19 ( 7 ) Houser Way S. from Main Ave. S. Houser Way N. at Bronson Way N. 20 ( 8 ) Logan Ave. N. - Smithers Ave. S. from S. Grady 21 Way to N. 6th St. 22 ( 9 ) Main Ave. S. from S . Grady Way to Bronson Way S. �3 ( 10 ) Airport Way from Rainier Ave. N. to Logan Ave. N. 24 ( 11 ) Union Ave. N.E. from N.E. 4th St . to North City Limits. 25 ( 12 ) Garden Ave. N. from N. 4th St. to N. 8th St . 26 ( 13 ) Maple Valley Way from Sunset Boulevard N. to 27 East City Limits . 28 ( 14 ) Shattuck Ave. S. from S . 2nd St. to S . 7th St . 29 ( 15 ) Burnett Ave. S. from S. 2nd St. to S. 7th St. 30 ( 16 ) S. 2nd St. from Main Ave. S. to Rainier Ave. S. 31 32 33 - 14 - rr^•.T.r+��y7 7i —,.^t a y.���7z ..afnF.r;v+�cgrr.fi`'. _ v•:'• .-s_. . 6309 ( 17 ) Bronson Way S. from Main Ave . S . to Bronson Way N. at Houser Way N. 2 ( 18 ) S. 3rd St. from Rainier Ave. S. to Main Ave . S. 3 ( 19 ) S . Puget Drive from Talbot Rd. S. to Puget Dr. 4 S.E . at Edmonds Ave. S.E. 5 ( 20 ) Renton Ave. Extension from West City Limits to Rainier Ave. N. 6 ( 21 ) S .W. Sunset Blvd. from West City Limits to 7 Rainier Ave. S. 8 ( 22) Sunset Blvd. N. from Bronson Way N. , N.E . Sunset Blvd. at East City Limits 9 ( 23 ) SR 515 Phase II (Puget Drive S. to S. City Limits 10 11 ( 24 ) Monroe Ave . N.E. from N.E. 4th St. to N.E. 12th St . ( 25) N .E. 12th St . from Edmonds Ave. N.E. to Union 12 Ave . N.E. 13 ( 26 ) Edmonds Ave. N.E. from N.E. Sunset Blvd. to N.E. 14 27th St. 15 ( 27 ) Aberdeen Ave. N.E. from Sunset Blvd. N.E. to N.E. 27th St . 16 ( 28 ) S . 7th St . from S . Grady Way to Rainier Ave. S. and 17 S .W. 7th St. from Rainier Ave. S. to Lind Ave. S .W. 18 ( 29 ) Taylor Ave . N.W. and Taylor Place N.W. to Stevens Ave. N.W. and N.W. 7th St. 19 ( 30) Burnett Ave. N. from N. 28th St . to Lake 20 - Washington Blvd. N. 21 ( 31 ) N. 30th St . from Burnett Ave. N. to Kennewick P1. N.E. 22 ( 32) Kennewick P1. N.E. from N.E. 30th St. to N.E. 23 27th St. and Edmonds Ave. N.E. 24 ( 33) S .W. 16th St. from West Valley Rd. to East Valley Road. 25 ( 34 ) Talbot Road S. from S . Grady Way to South 26 City Limits 27 ( 35) Williams Ave. S. to Williams Ave. N. from S. Grady Way to N. 6th St . 28 ( 36 ) S .W. 43rd St. from West Valley Road to Talbot 29 Road S. 30 ( 37 ) N.E. 16th St. from Jones Ave. N.E. to Edmonds Ave. N.E. 31 32 - 15 - 33 _ .....+-..S.$:'iJ,"irk. _ 7. ,. .''+r. ;Vr .. ... ... .. -. .. „ 689 ( 38 ) S . 4th St . from Main Avenue S. to Rainier Ave . S. 2 ( 39 ) N. E. 4th Street from Monroe Avenue N.E. to Union Avenue N.E. 3 Z . City of Seattle $29 , 000, 000 4 Portions of the following arterial streets: 5 6 ( 1 ) West Seattle Freeway ( 2) 92nd Street 8 ( 3 ) Alaskan Way Surface Street Improvements 9 ( 4 ) Yesler-Atlantic Neighborhood Improvement Program 10 ( 5 ) Meridian Avenue North 11 ( 6) S . McClellan Street and Rainier Avenue South 12 ( 7 ) S. Spokane Street 13 ( 8 ) S . Lander Street • 14 ( 9 ) S.W. Roxbury Street 15 ( 10) 15th Avenue N.W. 16 ( 11 ) 6th Avenue South 17 ( 12 ) Olson Place S.W. 18 ( 13 ) Delridge Way S.W. 19 (14 ) S.W. Orchard Street 20 ( 15) N.E. 42nd Street 21 ( 16) N. 50th Street 22 ( 17 ) Airport Way South 23 ( 18 ) S. Seattle Community College Arterials 24 ( 19 ) Downtown Traffic Circulation Improvements 25 ( 20 ) S. Dakota Street 26 ( 21 ) S . Alaska Street 27 ( 22) N.E. Pacific Street 28 ( 23) W. Marginal Way South 29 ( 24 ) N.E. 103rd Street 30 ( 25) 110th Street and others 31 ( 26 ) Arterial Street Lighting 32 - 16 - 33 'wtCr`+vrr ..-:. .. .r+.r.+r.�+#:+t!aT•-'nrnr,s-�.wt�•;-r. 4�t rn+rr+n.. { t • 6899 Portions of the following streets : 2 California Avenue S .W. Fauntleroy Way S.W. 3 Westlake Avenue North Rainier Avenue South 4 Aurora Avenue North S.W. Spokane Street 5 4th Avenue South 3rd Avenue 6 5th Avenue 4th Avenue 7 6th Avenue and others 8 9 ( 27 ) Arterial Traffic Control and Safety Spot Improvement- 10 CBD and Arterial Control System and New installations 11 Alaskan Way Median Barrier Aurora Avenue N. Median Barrier 12 23rd Avenue S . and Rainier Avenue S . Beacon Avenue S. and 15th Avenue S. 13 N. 145th Street and Meridian Avenue N. Empire Way at East Union 14 35th Avenue N.E. and N.E. 65th Street 1st Avenue N.E. and N.E. 117th Street 15 Sand Point Way N.E. an N.E . 95th Street N. 85th and Aurora Avenue N. 16 and others 17 AA. Town of Skykomish $4 , 800 18 ( 1 ) Improve existing arterials as necessary 19 BB. Town of Snoqualmie $ 24 ,816 (amended by Ordinance No. 1629 ) 20 ( 1 ) From south City limits on S.E. 2nd Ave . 21 to northwest City limits on River St. 22 ( 2 ) Silva Ave. from Southerly City Limits to Fir St. 23 ( 3 ) Fir St. from Silva to Railroad Ave. 24 ( 4 ) Cedar Ave. from Silva to Pine 25 ( 5 ) Pine Ave. from Cedar to S.E. 80th St. 26 ( 6 ) S .E. 80th St. from Pine Ave. , one block 27 West to City Limits. 28 CC. City of Tukwila $223, 536 (amended by Ordinance No. 6262) 29 ( 1 ) New Bridge across the Green River at 30 180th S. and West Valley Highway. ( 2) S . 180th from Christenson Rd. to 57th Ave . 31 S . ( Southcenter Pkwy. ) 32 - 17 — 33 .4..777 , ,. "" 7 -—: 7�- — 7-77 �,—_7,7 f �3 a �..� 4 •!h • 6399 ( 3 ) S . 144th St . from 58th Ave . S. to 53rd Ave . S. S.W. Grady Way 2 3 ( 4 ) 58th Ave. S . from Interurban Ave . to S. 147th. ( 5) 59th Ave. S . from S . 147th St. to S . 149th St . 4 5 ( 6 ) S . 149th St. from 59th Ave . S. to 62nd Ave. S. 6 ( 7) 62nd Ave. S . from 149th to Three Tree Point Rd . 7 ( 8 ) S . 152nd St. from McAdam Rd. to 62nd Ave . S. 8 ( 9 ) Southcenter Boulevard from Interstate Highway 5 to Interurban Avenue. 9 DD. Town of Yarrow Point $56 , 784 10 (amended by Ordinance No. 959 ) 11 ( 1 ) W. 1/2 of Points Dr. from N.E. 28th St . to Evergreen Point Bridge Freeway. 12 ( 2 ) 92nd Ave. N.E. within the limits of the Town 13 ( 3) 94th Ave. N.E. within the limits of the Town 14 ( 4 ) 95th Ave. N.E. from 92nd Ave. N.E. to N.E. 40th 15 ( 5) N.E. 40th from 92nd Ave. N.E. to 95th Ave. N.E. 16 EE. King County $31 , 926, 816 17 (amended by Ordinances No. 1016, 1236 and 3310 ) 18 (1 ) 48th Ave. S. E. and N.E. from S .E. 28th St. to Bellevue. 19 ( 2 ) S. E. 16th St . from S.E. 142nd St . to 20 168th Ave. S. E. 21 ( 3 ) 98th Ave. N.E. from Kirkland to N.E. 124t'h St. 22 ( 4 ) 16th Ave. N.E. from Northrup Rd. to �3 N.E. 72nd St. 24 ( 5 ) Northrup Way from 108th Ave. N.E. to 120th Ave. N.E. 25 ( 6 ) N. 160th St. from Aurora Ave . North to 26 Greenwood Ave. N. 27 ( 7 ) N.E. 175th St . and Conn. from 61st Ave. N.E. to 80th Ave. N.E. 28 ( 8 ) Main St . from 140th Ave. N.E. to 156th 29 Ave. N.E. 30 (9 ) S. 128th St . from 8th Ave. S. to Military Rd. 31 ( 10 ) S . 156th St. from 1st Ave. S . to Des Moines Way 32 33 - 18 - ' i�rF%YM..yve A .-,...�w,..7,.7�_p4 .:...,.._n.�,...,."T%...rge.;,>?+w,�..-.ryow.w,...,,t,•.•.... �Ty.-ter_-.—..'T•._; -. - .. -• 8S99 (11 ) S .W. 107-108th St. from 16th Ave . S.W. to Meyers Way. 2 ( 12 ) N.E. 150th St. from 15th Ave . N.E. to 3 24th Ave. N.E. 4 ( 13 ) N.E. 160th St . from SR 405 to 124th Ave . N.E. 5 ( 14 ) Coal Creek Pkwy. S .E. from Newport Way to 6 S.E. 72nd St . 7 ( 15 ) E. Marginal Way from S . 120th St. to S . 133rd St . 8 ( 16 ) S .W. 128th - 14th Ave. S.W. from Ambaum 9 Blvd. S .W. to S .W. 130th St . 10 ( 17 ) Normandy Rd. from Normandy Pk. City Limit to 1st Ave. S. 11 ( 18 ) S . 272nd St. from Pacific Highway S. to 12 42nd Ave. S. 13 ( 19 ) 140th Ave: S.E. from Petrovitsky Rd. to Fairwood Blvd. 14 (20 ) 51st Ave. S. from S . 288th St. to S. 320th St. 15 ( 21 ) Newport Way from Farmer Rd. to FAI 90 . 16 ( 22 ) N .E. 124th St. from SR 522 to Avondale Rd. 17 ( 23 ) Bellevue-Redmond Rd. from Northrup Rd. to 18 N.E. 32nd St. 19 ( 24 ) 100th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 124th St. to Bothell City Limit. 20 ( 25) 228th Ave. S.E. Extension from 228th Ave . S. E. 21 to E. Lake Sammamish. 22 ( 26) 17th Ave. S.W. from Roxbury to S.W. 107th St. 23 ( 27 ) Des Moines Way from S. 128th St. to S. 153rd St. 24 ( 28) Vashon Island Highway from S.W. 176th St. to S.W. 204th St. 25 ( 29 ) S . 188th St. from 1st Ave. S. to Military Rd. 26 ( 30) Petrovitsky Rd. Ext. from 196th Ave. S .E . 27 to Maple Valley Rd. 28 ( 31 ) S. 146th St. from 1st Ave. S. to Des Moines Way. 29 ( 32) S. 260th St. from 16th Ave. S. to Millitary Rd. S. 30 ( 33 ) S .E. 128th St. from 164th Ave. S.E. to 196th 31 Ave. S .E. 32 - 19 - 33 1wt:1 ^.0 a Zi ',N 3"-iv-^T"' '� n t.. � s. sue'.'+ '. ,t,yac .+, Y .au H � 1' Ie7 2 '' 4 j ,t,~S 4-' -. � •'.' t4 S 6899 ( 34 ) S .E. 240th St . from 132nd Ave . S.E. to 2 164th Ave. S . E. 3 ( 35 ) Dayton Ave. N. from Westminister Way N. to Richmond Beach Rd. 4 ( 36 ) 15th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 195th St. to 5 N.E. 205th St. 6 ( 37) Westminister Way from N. 145th St. to Aurora Way N. 7 ( 38 ) Woodinville-Duvall Rd . from 132nd Ave . N.E. 8 to W. Snoq. Valley Rd. 9 ( 39 ) 5th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 145th St . to N.E. 205th St. 10 ( 40 ) N.E. 155th St. from Aurora Ave. N. to 15th 11 Ave. N.E. 12 ( 41 ) S . 129th - S. 131st from Empire Way to Renton Ave. S . 13 ( 42 ) S. 216th St . - 42nd Ave. S. from Pacific 14 Highway S . to S. 212th St. 15 ( 43 ) Newport-Coal Creek Rd. from SR 900 to S .E. 72nd St. 16 ( 44 ) S . 176th St. from Tukwila city limit to 17 Pacific Highway S . 18 ( 45) Issaquah-Hobart Rd. from Issaquah city limit to Coalfield Rd. 19 ( 46 ) S . 312th St. from Pacific Highway S. to 20 28th Ave. S . 21 ( 47) S .W. 106th St. from Seattle city limit to 16th Ave. S.W. 22 ( 48 ) S . 160th St . from 24th Ave . S. to Pacific 23 Highway S. 24 ( 49 ) S . 170th St . from 24th Ave. S. to Pacific Highway S. 25 26 ( 50) 15th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 145th St . to N.E. 175th St. 27 ( 51 ) N.E. 205th St. from 15th Ave. N.E. to 40th P1. N.E. 28 ( 52) 61st Ave. N.E. from SR 522 to Snohomish 29 County. 30 ( 53 ) Novelty Hill Rd. from W. Snoqualmie Valley Rd. 31 to Avondale Rd. 32 33 - 20 - 6899 ( 54 ) Ambaum Blvd. S.W. from S .W. 100th St. to S .W. 144th St. 2 3 ( 55 ) Des Moines Way S. from S . 153rd St . to 12th P1. S . 4 ( 56 ) Frager Rd. from Tukwila city limit to S. 212th St. 5 ( 57) 21st Ave . S .W. from SR 509 to S .W. 356th St. 6 ( 58 ) Vashion Island Highway from S .W. 225th to 7 Pillsbury Ave. 8 ( 59 ) Banderette-Coalfield Rd. from S . 196th St. to Issaquah-Hobart Rd. 9 ( 60 ) 132nd Ave. S. E. from S. E. 208th St . to 10 S.E. 240th St. 11 ( 61 ) S . E. 448th St. from 244th Ave. S.E. to Enumclaw City Limit. 12 ( 62 ) S . 160th St. from Des Moines Way S. to 13 12th Ave. S . 14 ( 63 ) S . 129th St. - 24th Ave. S. from Empire Way to 42nd Ave. S. 15 ( 64 ) N.W. 205th St. from 8th Ave . N.W. to Aurora 16 Ave. N. 17 ( 65) 100th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 195th St. to N.E. 205th St. 18 ( 66 ) N.E. 132nd St. from 100th Ave. N.E. to 19 132nd P1. N.E. 20 ( 67 ) Vaughn Hill Rd. from E. Lake Sammamish to Fall City Rd. 21 • ( 68 ) S . 136th St . from 1st Ave. S. to Military 22 Rd. S . 23 ( 69 ) Lake Holm Rd. from Auburn-Black Diamond Rd. to Moneysmith Rd. 24 ( 70 ) Renton-Three Tree Point Rd . from S . 156th Rd. 25 42nd Ave. S. 26 ( 71 ) Des Moines Way S. from S . 188th St. to S. 200th St. 27 ( 72 ) 236th Ave. S.E. from S .E. 400th St. to S.E. 28 368th St. 29 ( 73 ) N.E. 124th St. from 100th Ave . N.E. to 132nd Ave. N.E. 30 31 ( 74 ) N.E. 124th St . from 132nd Ave . N.E. to SR 522. 32 - 21 - 33 �`i: ._ 6S99 ( 75 ) Beaver Lake Rd. from S .E. 228th St. to Lake. 2 ( 76 ) 124th Ave. N.E. from N.E. 132nd St. to 3 Woodinville Way N.E. 4 ( 77 ) 132nd Ave. S .E. from S .E. 240th St . to S. E. 312th St. 5 ( 78 ) S . and S .W. 320th St. from Pacific Highway S. 6 to 21st Ave. S .W. 7 ( 79 ) N.E . 155th St. from Juanita Way N.E. to 84th Ave. N.E. 8 ( 80 ) Brickyard Rd. from 100th Ave . N.E. to 9 FAI 405 10 ( 81 ) N. and N.E. 175th St. from Aurora to 15th Ave. N.E. 11 ( 82 ) Perkins Way from N.E. 185th St. to 15th 12 Ave. N.E. 13 ( 83 ) 73rd Ave. N. E. from SR 522 to Snohomish County. 14 ( 84 ) Snoqualmie-Lake Alice Rd . from FAI 90 15 to Snoqualmie. 16 ( 85) Petrovitsky Rd. from 108th Ave. S.E. to 196th Ave. S.E. 17 ( 86 ) 244th Ave. S. E. from U.S. 410 to 448th 18 Ave. S.E. 19 ( 87) 28th Ave. S. from S . 304th St . to S. 320th St. 20 ( 88 ) 88th Ave. N.E. from SR 522 to Snohomish 21 County. 22 ( 89 ) Meridian Ave. N. from N.E. 145th St. to N.E. 205th St. 23 ( 90 ) 3rd Ave. N.W. from Richmond Beach Rd. 24 to N.W. 205th St. 25 ( 91 ) 164th Ave. S.E. from S .E. 240th St. to SR 516 26 ( 92) Peasley Canyon Rd. from W. Valley Highway 27 to 51st Ave. S. 28 ( 93 ) Union Hill Rd. from Avondale Rd. to 196th Ave. N.E. 29 94 ) 16th Ave. S. from Pacific Highway S. to 30 SR 18 31 32 33 - 22 51177 '� �' "T•_... ."^�}r,, i.Grn;r.I. :�n z .. Li fFs4�_ riw.�.A.-.', • 6899 1 ( 95 ) Renton Ave . S. from 76th Ave . S. to lienton City Limit. 2 3 ( 96 ) S. 144th St . from Des Moines Way S. to Pacific Highway S. 4 ( 97 ) 84th Ave. N.E. - N.E . 122nd St. from 5 Juanita Way to Simonds Rd. 6 ( 98 ) S. 304th St . from Pacific Highway S. to Military Rd. 7 ( 99 ) • 148th Ave. S. E. from S .E. 256th St. to 8 S . E. 208th St. 9 ( 100 ) 132nd Ave. N.E. from SR 522 to Snohomish County 10 ( 101 ) 8th Ave. N.W. from Richmond Beach Rd. 11 to N.W. 205th St. 12 ( 102 ) S . E. 256th St. from Kent City limits to 132nd Ave. S .E. 13 14 (The following projects were added by Ordinance No. 3310. ) 15 ( 103) 1-71 N & N.E. 135th St . (Aurora Ave. N. to 10th Ave. N.E. ) 16 ( 104 ) 2-71 N. 175th St . (Aurora Ave. N. to Dayton 17 Ave. N. ) 18 ( 105 ) 4-71 Simonds Road ( 68th Ave N.E. to 100th Ave. N.E . ) 19 ( 106 ) 5-71 S.W. Roxbury St. ( 4th Ave. S.W. to 20 18th Ave. S.W. ) 21 ( 107) 6-71 132nd Ave. S.E. ( SR 900 to S.E. 128th St. ) 22 ( 108 ) 8-71 S.E. 212th St. , S.E. 208th St. (Kent 23 City Limits to 132nd Ave. S.E. ) 24 ( 109 ) 9-71 Lea Hill Road (Auburn City Limits to 132nd Ave. S .E. ) 25 26 ( 110 ) 11-71 228th Ave. N.E. Extension (Sahallee ) (N.E. 8th St. to SR 202) 27 ( 111 ) 13-72 132nd Ave. N.E. and N.E. 120th St. from N.E. 60th St. to Slater Ave N.E. 28 ( 112) 14-72 Avondale Road and Avondale Conn. from 29 Woodinville - Duvall Rd. to State Rt . 520 30 ( 113 ) 16-72 S and S .W. 116th St. from Ambaum Blvd. S.W. to 5th Ave. S. 31 32 33 - 23 - �` _ _ 7� am 7: *a:- FOr T r ry t +IP.+" �, 1 • • 6S99 1 ( 114 ) 17-72 8th Ave. S. from Glendale Way (S. 112th St. ) to S. 152nd St. 2 ( 115 ) 19-72 4th Ave. S.W. from S .W. Roxbury St. to 3 S .W. 160th St. 4 ( 116 ) 20-72 26th Ave. S.W. from S .W. Roxbury St. to S .W. 116 St. 5 6 ( 117 ) 21-72 5th Ave. S. from 6th Ave. S. to S . 128th St. 7 ( 118 ) 23-72 Glendale Way S. ( S. 112th St . , 8 14th Pl. S . , 17th Ave. S. , S. 118th St . ) from 6th Ave. S. to Des Moines Way 9 ( 119 ) 24-72 S .W. 146th St. from Ambaum Blvd. S .W. 10 to 1st Ave. S. 11 ( 120 ) 25-72 24th Ave. S . from S. 116th St. to S. 154th St. 12 ( 121 ) 26-72 124th Ave. S . E. from SR 516 to 13 S. E. 320th St. 14 ( 122) 28-72 Carr Rd (S .E. 180th St. to S.E . 176th SR) from E. Valley Rd. to SR 515 15 ( 123 ) 29-72 140th Ave. S .E. from S .E . Petrovitsky 16 Rd. to S. E. 208th St. 17 ( 124 ) 31-72 Ambaum Blvd. S.W. from S .W. 144th St . to 1st Ave. S. 18 ( 125) 39-72 Coalfield - Issaquah Rd. , 164th Ave . 19 S. E. from SR 900 to Newport - Coal Creek Rd. 20 ( 126) 42-72 Fremont Ave. N. from N. 165th St. to N. 205th St. 21 ( 127 ) 46-72 124th Ave. N.E. and Kingsgate Way from 22 N.E. 85th St. to N.E. 132nd St. 23 ( 128 ) 63-72 Military Road S. from Kent City Limits to Pierce County Line. 24 ( 129 ) 65-72 Auburn - Black Diamond Rd. from Auburn 25 City Limits to Kent - Black Diamond Rd. 26 ( 130 ) 67-72 Kent - Kangley Rd. from SR 169 to Enumclaw-Selleck Rd. 27 ( 131 ) 69-72 Enumclaw - Selleck Rd. from S .E. 308th 28 St. to S.E. 392nd St. 29 ( 132 ) 71-72 S. 320th St. from Pacific Highway S. to 51st Ave. S . 30 ( 133 ) 72-72 212th P1 . S.E. from Auburn - Black 31 Diamond Rd. to Green Valley Rd. 32 — 24 — 33 7 w ";. .r;'. •f r .1-;.�`4 �� T ._,. -:- L it �'.t�, A.;�� f�+� h„E !s„' ,�;• �.�,-t}r r .r. .. »�M,:. ;te>.:.. .... 'r•: ^.t...e..aa+. N4 ., n?:t 5 t: • 6 699 1 (134 ) 73-72 S. 216th St. from Military Rd. S. to 1st Ave. S . 2 3 Wherever in the foregoing description the words "City 4 limits" are used they are intended to refer to the corporate limits as of the date of adoption of this 5 resolution. 6 FF . Improved traffic control signals and street lighting served by underground wiring shall be acquired, con- 7 structed and installed within the right of way of those arterial highways within the County, which are designated 8 as principal travelled arterials by the Legislative Authority of either the County or the City of Seattle 9 respectively, and wherein all other electric and tele- phone utility wires and cables shall have been placed 10 underground either prior to or in conjunction with such improvement . The portion of Bond proceeds allocated for 11 this purpose shall be used and applied solely for such purpose The portion of such proceeds allocated to the 12 County shall be applied approximately equally to the improvement of arterials presently located in unincor- 13 porated areas of the County and arterials presently located in incorporated areas of the County other than 14 the City of Seattle. Any installation within any City may be performed by the County or by such City pursuant 15 to agreement with the County and in any event shall first be approved by the Legislative Authority of such city. 16 King County $3 , 300 , 000 17 City of Seattle $3 , 300 ,000 18 GG. Street tree planting and landscaping shall be acquired and installed along those portions of arterial highways 19 within the County which the Legislative Authority of the County or the City of Seattle shall respectively deter- 20 - mine most require beautification or sound or visual buffers. That portion of Bond proceeds allocated for 21 this purpose shall be used and applied solely for such purpose . The portion of such proceeds allocated to the 22 County shall be applied approximately equally to street tree planting and landscaping along arterials presently 23 located within unincorporated areas of the County and arterials presently located within the incorporated areas 24 of the County other than the City of Seattle . Any instal- lation within any City may be performed by the County or 25 by such City pursuant to agreement with the County and in any event shall first be approved by the Legislative 26 Authority of such City. 27 King County $ 500,000 City of Seattle $1 , 500 ,000 28 HH. The following portion of Bond proceeds to be allocated as 29 set forth in Column 2 in Section 10 under the heading "Proceeds Allocated to Other Cities , " shall be used and 30 applied consistent with this resolution by Cities other than the City of Seattle for Arterial Highway Facilities 31 which are located within such Cities and which may have 32 - 25 - 33 • T. r. f 1- !Y 1.7.1 i '.5}._ .'a _�'f•. �i... 4. r ...rai"'['. r. �..r� [' `'ri^;V;.Ji:..Y�,� f y r ' f vim{ �•�.s �•- s .�,. .11 'i'vtl :S !.41 �,'N'.`Y�W7�9(,�T!!R1 �! p. .� 't�l��iS'f�� ! �,C_.N:a�"'. 6� ��� .-i•_#�"1M��SY�. �+li'�. 'r �. �"� j�.�t. r 6899 been approved by the Urban Arterial Board created pursuant to Chapter 83 Laws of 1967 ( Ex. Sess . ) . The 2 proceeds shall be allocated by the Board among such Cities with the advice of an Urban Arterial Advisory 3 Board to be hereafter created by the Board and to be composed of representatives of the Cities affected. 4 ( Cities other Than Seattle ) $2, 000 , 000 5 6 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this l day of 7 ,8 1984 . 9 PASSED this ' d `_-- - �ay of " X , 1984 . 10 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 11 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 12 13 hair n 14 15 ATTEST: 16 17 �0 !C7. L��cr.•�a_ rk the Council 18 19 APPROVED this 23 "Tay of v , 198 20 21 Ca0n 22 1in o Exe utive 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 . 31 32 2 33 6 • ► t9iC)r ` ✓ ,:r',y ti.;• •T *..i. .c:,x .r �r '*) • � T('X !Pwr "fy''_T' ti ..y � i.L�M..7 .; ` -- RESOLUTION NO. 2576 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, 'WASHINGTON, approving the issuance of revenue bonds of the King County Economic Enterprise Corporation pursuant to RCW 39 . 84 . 060 . WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Washington has provided for the creation of public corporations by munici- palities, including counties, pursuant to Chapter 300, Laws of Washington, 1981 (Regular Sessions codified as Chapter 39. 84 RCW, as amended (the "Act" ) , for the purpose of faci- litating economic development and employment opportunities in the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, King County (the "County" ) has by Ordinance No. 6628 (the "Ordinance") created and approved the charter of a public corporation, designated as "King County Economic Enterprise Corporation" (herein the "Corporation" ) in order to carry out the purposes of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Corporation has received an application from Franck/Thomas Partnership (the "Partnership") for the financing of the acquisition of land and the construction and installation of a warehouse facility and service area of approximately 20 , 000 square feet for the warehousing of industrial equipment and materials at a location which is within the boundaries of the City of Renton (the "Project") ; and WHEREAS, the Corporation has reviewed the application of the Partnership, has determined that the Project qualifies as an "industrial development facility" within the meaning of the Act and has approved the issuance of its revenue bonds to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Project by its Resolution No. 84-12 adopted on September 7, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that each city within whose planning jurisdiction the Project is to be located must approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the Corporation for such Project; and WHEREAS, the Corporation, as the issuer of the revenue bonds for the Project, has requested the approval of the City pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Renton has been assured that there will be no financial liability accruing to the City as a result of such approval and that this approval shall constitute approval solely for the purpose of permitting the Corporation to proceed with the issuance of such revenue bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, pursuant to RCW 39 . 84 . 060 does hereby approve the issuance of revenue bonds (the "Bonds" ) by the King County Economic Enterprise Corporation, King County, Wash- ington for the purposes of financing the above-described Project under the Act. The Bonds are to be issued by the Corporation in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $800, 000 pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and approved by the King County Council. The Bonds shall be entitled "King County Economic Enterprise Corporation, King County, Washington, Revenue Bonds (Franck/Thomas Partnership Project) . " The proceeds of the Bonds are to be used to loan money to Franck/Thomas Partnership to acquire and build the Project pursuant to a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement" ) . The Bonds shall be payable solely from the Partnership' s obligations to repay under the Loan Agreement. The Bonds shall not constitute an obligation of the City, and no tax funds or other revenues of the City shall be used to pay the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. Neither the faith and credit nor any taxing power or revenues of the City shall ever be pledged to pay the principal of, premium, if any, or the interest on the Bonds. This Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds under the Act by the Corporation for the purpose of financing the Project. Section 2 . This resolution is intended solely to constitute approval of the issuance of revenue bonds within the meaning of RCW 39 . 84 .060 . This approval shall not in any way be deemed to be a review or final approval of any development permit for the Project which may be in process, or may be submitted at a future date. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19th day of November, 1984 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of November, 2984 . Y&CLAAK4n0) Barbara Y. ShYnpoch, MAyor Approved as to form: L.vrence J._1 r-- - , City Attorney OF R4,1 tyIP z THE CITY OF RENTON • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o m BARBARA Y. SH INPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, .9.43 �o CITY CLERK (206) 235-2500 O9�TFzo SEP1—�O�P November 21, 1984 Nancy Neraas Preston, Thorgrimson Ellis & Holman 2000 I.B.M. Building P.O. Box 2927 Seattle, WA 98111 Subject: City of Renton - Resolution No. 2576 Dear Ms Neraas: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of November 19, 1984, adopted Resolution Number 2576 approving the issuance of revenue bonds of the King County Economic Enterprise Corporation. A copy of the resolution is enclosed for distribution to affected parties. If you have any questions please call. Very truly yours, • CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk enclosures I� .C ,� c RESOLUTION NO. 2576 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, 'WASHINGTON, approving the issuance of revenue bonds of the King County Economic Enterprise Corporation pursuant to RCW 39 . 84 . 060 . WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Washington has provided for the creation of public corporations by munici- palities, including counties, pursuant to Chapter 300, Laws of Washington, 1981 (Regular Session) codified as Chapter 39 . 84 RCW, as amended (the "Act") , for the purpose of faci- litating economic development and employment opportunities in the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, King County (the "County" ) has by Ordinance No. 6628 (the "Ordinance" ) created and approved the charter of a public corporation, designated as "King County Economic Enterprise Corporation" (herein the "Corporation" ) in order to carry out the purposes of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Corporation has received an application from Franck/Thomas Partnership (the "Partnership") for the financing of the acquisition of land and the construction and installation of a warehouse facility and service area of approximately 20 ,000 square feet for the warehousing of industrial equipment and materials at a location which is within the boundaries of the City of Renton (the "Project") ; and WHEREAS, the Corporation has reviewed the application of the Partnership, has determined that the Project qualifies as an "industrial development facility" within the meaning of the Act and has approved the issuance of its revenue bonds to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Project by its Resolution No. 84-12 adopted on September 7, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that each city within whose planning jurisdiction the Project is to be located must approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the Corporation for such Project; and WHEREAS, the Corporation, as the issuer of the revenue bonds for the Project, has requested the approval of the City pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Renton has been assured that there will be no financial liability accruing to the City as a result of such approval and that this approval shall constitute approval solely for the purpose of permitting the Corporation to proceed with the issuance of such revenue bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVFi as follows ; Section 1. The City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, pursuant to RCW 39 . 84 . 060 does hereby approve the issuance of revenue bonds (the "Bonds" ) by the King County Economic Enterprise Corporation, King County, Wash- ington for the purposes of financing the above-described Project under the Act. The Bonds are to be issued by the Corporation in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $800, 000 pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and approved by the King County Council. The Bonds shall be entitled "King County Economic Enterprise Corporation, King County, Washington, Revenue Bonds (Franck/Thomas Partnership Project) . " The proceeds of the Bonds are to be used to loan money to Franck/Thomas Partnership to acquire and build the Project pursuant to a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement" ) . The Bonds shall be payable solely from the Partnership' s obligations to repay under the Loan Agreement. The Bonds shall not constitute an obligation of the City, and no tax funds or other revenues of the City shall be used to pay the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. Neither the faith and credit nor any taxing power or revenues of the City shall ever be pledged to pay the principal of, premium, if any, or the interest on the Bonds. This Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds under the Act by the Corporation for the purpose of financing the Project. Section 2 . This resolution is intended solely to constitute approval of the issuance of revenue bonds within the meaning of RCW 39 . 84 . 060 . This approval shall not in any way be deemed to be a review or final approval of any development permit for the Project which may be in process, or may be submitted at a future date. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19th day of November, 1984 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of November, 2984 . ?&ax•tyrAs‘o) 'd�L oci Barbara Y. Shnpoch, M yor Approved as to form: LAFarence J.-7 r-ef, City Attorney Renton City Council 10/22/84 Page three Consent Agenda Consent Agenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORFESPONDENCE MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, CORRESPONDENCE King County FROM KING COUNTY COUNCILWOMAN CYNTHIA SULLIVAN REGARDING General apyplopmga„L PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE AND THE CHANGES IN POLICY Guice ' BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Hughes reported attending recent dedication Sculpture of aluminum donkey sculpture at Tonkin Park, and suggested that Placue a plaque explaining significance of the use of donkeys in coal mining industry in Renton may be helpful to spectators. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that if a plaque is not already planned, she will suggest that it be placed on the site. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Development a report regarding G. M. Associates request for a two-year Committee extension of B-1 zoning granted under File No. R-019-82 for G. M. Associates the Northward Rezone in 1982. The Committee found that the Request for B-1 zoning for the subject property was approved upon the ExtEnsion of condition that the zoning would revert to its earlier G-1 Zon ng classification if a building permit is not issued for the property within two years following the enactment of the ordinance. Con :inued The Committee found that the condition of rezone approval has not been met, is not likely to be met in the near future since extension of utilities has not occurred, and an extension is unwarranted in considering the facts and circumstances presented by the applicant. It appears the requested rezone is premature. Con :inued There is no established procedure by which the applicant is entitled to request an extension of the zone reclassification. Therefore, in the event that the zoning of the subject property reverts pursuant to the rezone ordinance and the restrictive covenants, then the appropriate procedure would be for the applicant to file a new application for rezone. That application would be considered by the Hearing Examiner and the City Council in the light of the present facts and circumstances and without regard to the previously granted zone reclassification which was contingent upon development of the property. Con:inued Therefore, the Committee recommends that the City Council adopt the findings set forth above and deny the applicant' s request for an extension of the zone reclassification. Also recommended is referral to Ways and Means Committee for necessary legislation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Committee concurring in the recommendation of the Public Works Schneider Homes, Department to issue right-of-way construction permits on Inc. Request for the City' s Springbrook Watershed property (Squire Utility Crossing acquisition) to Schneider Homes, Inc. as follows: Continued 15-foot right-of-way construction permit for watermain and storm drain on the northeast side; and 25-foot right-of-way construction for storm drain on the west side. Continued The payment will be 30% of our purchase price. The Committee further recommends the developer be allowed to expand the detention pond by one-third of its present size, and reimburse the City at 100% of our purchase price ($.597 per square foot) . In addition, the developer shall be required to pay all processing, recording and legal fees. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED, r - ♦ - w Y . A`. .4 e r ,., October 10,1984 Dear King County Residents: As many of you know,the County Council has been working for the past few months on the County Executive's proposed General Development Guide, the revised long range plan for King County. After the first round of public workshops on the Guide,the Planning and Community Development Committee,which I chair,deliberated intensively throughout the summer. Revisions to the Guide have been proposed based on the public comments. These revisions will be discussed in another series of public workshops this fall. The revisions being considered by the Committee are presented as a compromise which preserves the sound principles of growth management for maintaining our high quality of life as expressed by Executive Revelle,while honoring the desire for more flexibility as requested by the public. The Planning and Community Development Committee has made no recommendations on the proposed changes in order to encourage maximum public comment. The basic differences between the Executive's Guide and the proposed changes are outlined in this brochure. Dates and times of public meetings are listed on the back. I encourage you to contact my office at 344-3483 if you have any questions or comments. We are planning for the future of our county. The Committee members and I look forward to seeing you at the public meetings. Sincerely, Cynthia Sullivan,Chair Planning and Community Development Committee THE, LANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE KING COUNTY COUNCIL ANNOUNCES: Public Meetings to Discuss the Proposed Changes to the Executive Proposed General Development Guide All meetings are scheduled from 7:30-9:30 p.m. OCTOBER 23,Tuesday SNOQUALMIE NOVEMBER 8,Thursday BELLEVUE Snoqualmie Middle School Public Safety Training Center 39500 Snoqualmie/North Bend Road 1838-116th N.E. (Enter via driveway on N.E.22rd1 OCTOBER 24,Wednesday WOODINVILLE Leota Jr.High School 19301-168th Ave.N.E. NOVEMBER 13,Tuesday FEDERAL WAY Decatur High School 2800 S.W.320th OCTOBER 30,Tuesday MAPLE VALLEY Community Service Center 22010 S.E.248th NOVEMBER 15,Thursday BURIEN NOVEMBER 1,Thursday ENUMCLAW Highline School District Administrative Office Community Center 15675 Ambaum Blvd.S.W. 1350 Cole EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS. Written comments on the proposed changes are encouraged,and should be sent to: Cynthia Sullivan,Chair, Planning and Community Development Committee,King County Council,Room 402,King County Courthouse,Seattle,WA 98104. • WHAT'S NEXT. The King County Council's Planning and Community Development Committee will consider public comments on pro- posed changes to the General Development Guide before recommending a plan to the full Council for review and adoption.The County Council will schedule public hearings on the Committee proposal before taking action. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Contact Michele McFadden of the Council Staff at 344-7370 or Karen Unrath,Legislative Aide to Cynthia Sullivan,at 344-7421. PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE Planning and Community Development Committee King County Council 402 King County Courthouse Seattle,Washington 98104 Cynthia Sullivan,Chair Bruce Laing,Vice Chair Paul Barden Gary Grant Audrey Gruger KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 1985 O PUBLIC.1fF.ET/NGS TO DISCUSS PROPOSED CHANGES TO 771E E.t'E('L'TIVE PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE TIME DATED MATERIAL ` russuu ncv¢ee rasa rLeuv nuu rescD Urban Area__ Mapped only generally oca- Mapped in more detail than the M in more detail than the Locations Si tion; allowed up to per 1964 Plan; encompasses both de- encompasses smaller Densities acre,with densities o s per veloped areas and areas with GDG by including only acre or higher only cent to potential for development; calls authorized for sewers, and cities. for 7-8 units per acre where possi- shifting balance to Growth Reserve; • ble, but allows existing density calls for 7-units per acre where patterns to continue where they possible,but allows existing density are well established or based on patterns to continue where they constraints. are well established or based on constraints. Growth Reserve Described in policies as requiring Not a separate concept; incorp- Proposed for areas outside LSA 5-acre parcels;not mapped;imple- orated into Urban. Densities but within foreseeable Growth mented with 1-acre zoning. In allowed as in Urban, subject to Area. Mapped according to drain- subsequent community plans, 2.5 availability of services. age boundaries and community and 5-acre Growth Reserve zones plan designation boundaries. Sub- have been applied. urban to Urban densities allowed based on services and determined through community plans. Rural Area Not distinguished from agricul- Specifically mapped. Recognized Specifically mapped. Recognized Locations& ture,forestry etc. as a residential life-style to be as a residential lifestyle to be Densities preserved. 5 to 10-acre lots. preserved. 2.5 to 5-acre lots. Environment and Addressed in a series of supple- Concepts consolidated into one No major changes. Open Space ments to the 1964 Plan--Open chapter and also incorporated into Space, Steep Slopes, Wetlands, chapters on development policies. Wildlife Habitat. Community Plans Issue not contemplated; commu- Community plans to comply with States major county-wide issues pity plans evolved after Compre- Guide; revise as soon as possible and concerns that must be con- hensive Plan. to implement Guide concepts. sidered in community plan pro- cesses; re-affirms existing commu- nity plans until revised in normal schedule. Facilities and Not addressed in detail;no timing Addresses timing of services rela- Generally, same as GDG, but Services policies. sive to development; availability eliminates the Urban Growth and adequacy prerequisite to de- Center concept. ` velopment. Would specify Urban Growth Centers within Urban Areas to focus public spending. Activity Centers Policies on design, location rela- Establishes criteria for Activity Provides expanded opportunities rive to other uses, and scale pro- Centers and limits most commercial for proposing commercial or indus- vided. Locations for new centers and industrial uses to these loce- tiral uses at independent locations not addressed by policies. tions. or as focal points for new Activi• , ty Centers. Agriculture Recognized as part of Open Space; Recognized as Resource Lands. Recognized as Resource Lands; implemented with 10-acre zoning, 15 and 35-acre parcels proposed. 10-acre parcels generally proposed. development rights acquisition. Mapped in detail (RL-2) but not Larger parcels 120-35 acres) under separately on Comprehensive Plan consideration in Snoqualmie Valley Map. Development rights acquisi- and parts of Enumclaw Plateau. tion continued. Development rights acquisition continued. Forestry Recognized as part of Open Space; Recognized as Resource Lands. Recognized as Resource Lands. implemented with one-acre zoning. 80acre parcels proposed. 80-acre parcels proposed. (Smaller minimum parcels being considered.) No conversion policy stated or No conversion allowed. Mapped Would provide a mechanism for needed; zoning allows conversion in detail but not separately on conversion, with standards. Two readily. Mapped generally. Comprehensive Plan Map. types of mechanisms possible: Comprehensive Plan amendment or an administrative procedure. Included in definition of Open Areas not yet mapped specific- Areas not mapped;policies addres- Extraction Space; no detailed policies; ally; policy guidance is provided. sing when quarry mining zone Minerals,etc. regulated under quarry mining zone Mapping to occur as implements- or unclassified use permits should and unclassified use permits; no tion measure. be applied are added. official guidance as to when to apply which method. PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATIONS •Lie � MI I �or.re a f 1 rrr r y r<`. ' r -,� 0 URBAN AREAS 'll ) , r _ r. ` ;,r Proposed for growth at a variety of „ r - p residential densities,including abundant I I r f i •� --� open space,and urban facility/service Mal l _,,, - f. i standards. ". - r ® GROWTH RESERVE AREAS [.., ,11111 lll il�, �.s alpne�al,e.see To remain in low deoaity load ow . 1 Il 1 f ra until urban facilities and soviea are • Il r assured,at which time urban end sub. ����®® r • [ll 110 sra.. f urban uses will be allowed. • Ill I I s r V Y r rF r... RURAL AREAS • T+wr llll II' 'Ill' r _ - - ,,,... .,,,c,i,....;._,,„,,:,:.,,,,,:.;...:......,...;...,,,,,,:: To,anent in low density,runt land uses IIII _ with rural facility/service standards,for the hill �---7 foreseeable futon. • _ ,r tar 4 7 RESOURCE LANDS • r r f ry and be conserved for farming,forestry • , 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIII -' (�`f rY- 4r,L._ mining. e III J f r Oo° .r 5.�f f ar.m r r _, Activity Centers • r r r - `{r.A • Cities with concentrations of jobs/ " �r 'r '' t r r•r• shopping 4iessai • Concentrations of jobs/shopping in . r "� .'. _ :- ..`f-r unincorporated King County. r` - ',(r/ ` li r- - '''cam,rrr ConcenConcentrationst r,r,: `Rural Towns f Concentrations of jobs/shopping/housing in Rural Area,including cities. CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2 5 6 3 A RESOLUTION DECLARING SUPPORT FOR ADOPTION OF THE KING COUNTY GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE NHEREAS the Executive Proposed General Development Guide establishes goals and policies guiding development throughout King County, in incorporated cities as well as in unincc rporated areas, and WHEREAS the City of Renton has legitimate concerns about the quality. location, and impacts of urban growth within the City and in nearby unincorporated areas, and VIHEREAS, existing and future urban development must be provided with adequate public facilities and services in a logical and equitable manner, and V1 HEREAS, the proposed General Development Guide identifies the local cities as the primary service providers for much of the anticipated new growth and the Guide incorpora es many of the other land use concerns of the City of Renton, and WHEREAS the City Council and staff of Renton have reviewed the proposed General Development Guide, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLC WS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SE:TION II: The City of Renton supports adoption of the Executive Proposed General Development Guide and commends the King County Executive and staff for addressing the complex urban growth problems which face all of King County. SECTION III: The City of Renton endorses the opportunities for Renton, King County, ard other local jurisdictions to work together closely to solve mutual urban growth prof lems. SECTION IV: The City of Renton acknowledges the many positive elements incorporated in the Executive Proposed General Development Guide and is pleased to find recognition and inclusion within the Guide of many of the points of view and concerns raised by tho local cities. SEC TION V: The City of Renton urges the King County Council and Executive to give due cor sideration to the remaining specific concerns expressed more particularly in a letter dated August 13, 1984, from the Renton City Council. SECTION VI: Both the staff and elected officials of the City of Renton stand ready to work cooperatively with King County and other jurisdictions to solve mutual urbi n development problems and to assist in implementing King County's General Development Guide. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of August, 1984. Marilyn . ersen; Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of August, 1984. Barbara Y. Shfhpochh, Nlayor Approved as to form: La enc 3 J. Warren ity Attorney ` Renton City Council August 13, 1984 Page five ORDIP ANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - continued Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolutions for reading and adoption : Resolution #2563 A resolution was read declaring support for the adoption of the King County King County General Development Guide. MOVED BY CLYMER, General SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION Development Guide AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2564 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor to sign on behalf Scott Annexation of the City for a specific property contiguous to the proposed Scott Annexation (NE Sunset Boulevard between NE 12th Street and Honey Creek) to be included within that private annexation . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. City Attorney Warren noted this property had been acquired as part of the right-of-way to install the Honey Creek sewer interceptor and that the City would retain the rights of any private property owner within annexation processes. CARRIED. Vouchers Approved Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 1634 through 1948 in the amount of $593, 236. 96, having received departmental certifica- tion that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. Vouchers 1630 through 1633 machine voided. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW 13USINESS Councilman Keolker requested information concerning the traffic Traffic Counters counters presently located at Third Avenue and Cedar. New City Hall Councilman Stredicke commented on the vast improvement provided Directional by the new information/directional signs installed on each floor of Signs City Hall. ADMINISTRATIVE In response to prior Council inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch reported REPC RT there are presently 135 part-time employees at the City, 13 of Part-time whom are related to full-time personnel. This was an update Personnel of the 124 part-time/11 related report given in June. The Mayor noted all applications are on file in the Personnel Department, and hiring was accomplished in accordance with City standards, policies, and procedures. County Executive Mayor Shinpoch announced that County Executive Randy Revelle Visitation would be visiting the City on Wednesday, 8/15, and invited Council to participate in the visit. AUD ENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, questioned spending $250, 000 Fire Fighter on a 57-acre fire fighter training facility near North Bend (as Training Facility reported in the Renton Record-Chronicle) . Mayor Shinpoch indicated the facility was to offer specialized fire fighter training as opposed to day-to-day occurrence training; it had not yet been determined whether there would be duplication of training currently provided by the State facility; and Council would not be making a decision on this matter until all information was available. Highlands Community Richard Lucas, 2005 Harrington Circle NE, read a letter from Church - the staff and elders of the Highlands Community Church, 3031 Opposition to NE Tenth, opposing the opening of Slick Willy's Tavern, claiming Slick Willy's it to be detrimental to the moral, spiritual, and social welfare of the community . The letter also disfavored the proposed tavern's close proximity to their church, housing for the elderly, a park, school, and general residential area. Mr. Lucas thanked Council for the opportunity to be heard on this issue at the hearing, and urged Council to establish standards for the types of businesses opening in the community while allowing for community input. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 13, 1984 ORDIIANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Days and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Utility Permits/Fees for Work in Public Right of Way The Flays and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for firs: reading: Schumsky Rezone, R-051-84 (Property located in the 1300 block of Lake Washington Boulevard N.) Fund Transfer for Library Book Sale Funds The gays and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption : King County General Development Guide Authorizing the Mayor to Sign on Behalf of the City for Property to be Included in Scott Annexation APPR)VAL OF VOUCHERS The 'Jays and Means Committee recommends Approval of Vouchers No. 1634 through No. 1948 in the amount of $593,236.96. W . Earl Clymer, Chai an John Reed Nancy Mat6Ws • Renton City Council August 13, 1984 Page three CONSENT /.GENDA - continued Grady Way SW Public Works Department requested approval of resolution to Grant allow Mayor and City Clerk to sign documents and grant offers Execution to enable acceptance of State Urban Arterial Board funds to reconstruct SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW to Longacres Drive. Refer to Transportation Committee. Consent Acenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT Adopted THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Gene Williams, Associate Planner, Policy Scott Anne<ation Development Department, requesting approval of City's parti- cipation in 75% Scott Annexation Petition, City-owned property needed to boost percentage above the required 75% of assessed valuation. Proposed annexation located adjacent to NE Sunset Boulevard between NE 12th Street and Honey Creek. Adoption of resolution required (see later action) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDA- TION OF THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Hughes presented a Committee of the Whole Committee Df report recommending the Administration prpeare a letter the Whole outlining specific City concerns and observations related to Kind Couankyal the General Development Guide currently under King County Development Guide Council consideration. The report also recommended the Ways and Means Committee prepare a resolution supporting the general planning concepts contained in the Guide, acknowledging the benefits that should result once the plan is adopted and an implementation strategy is developed. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later action) Communit} Services Community Services Chairman Keolker presented a report Committee recommending Council take the following steps regarding the 1985 MCC Block annual review of the Block Grant Program: Grant Prolram Policies 1 . Adopt the 1985 Program Policies. 2. Authorize the Mayor to submit a letter of intent for Public Service funds. 3. Authorize the Mayor to submit a letter of intent for the City's share of planning and administration monies and a request for any extra planning administration funds available. 4. Refer any shortfall in program funding ( 1985 estimate: $4, 000) for review under the 1985 budget process for consideration at that time. continued MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT . CARRIED. Liquor Li sense Councilman Stredicke questioned the procedure of having the Approval Process Land Use Hearing Examiner involved in connection with the (Slick Willy's liquor application in the Highlands. Mayor Shinpoch explained Tavern) that a policy precedent has never been set for this circumstance: In late June, the application for liquor license was received for Slick Willy's Tavern to be located in the Highlands (building formerly occupied by Waterbed Warehouse) , and the application was processed in the normal manner. The police background check was commendable, zoning requirements were completely in order, and the application was returned to the Liquor Board with City approval . Mrs. Eskenazi then notified the City of her objections to the size and location of the tavern (and, later, the objections of 300± citizens) , and was told to contact the State COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 13, 1984 KING COUNTY GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE The City Council recommends that the Administration prepare a letter outlining the city's specific concerns and observations related to the General Development Guide currently under King County Council consideration . In addition , the Ways and Means Committee should prepare a resolution supporting the general planning concepts contained in the Guide and acknowledging the benefits that should result once the plan is adopted and an implementation strategy is developed. Rober J. Hughes Council President ClerK OF R4, C �; ® 0 THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL BUILDING . 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 99055 • 235-2586 0 0 CO 09q��O SEPj°sO August 13, 1984 The Honorable Randy Revelle, King County Executive Members of the King County Council King County Courthouse Third Avenue and James Street Seattle, Wi\ 98104 RE: King (;ounty's General Development Guide Dear King County Executive and Councilmembers: As expressed in the attached resolution, the City of Renton extends its support for adcption of the Executive Proposed General Development Guide for King County. The proposed Guide establishes a positive framework for accommodating urban growth. Many of the concerns of the City of Renton have been addressed in this latest proposal. However, cur general concerns about growth in King County merit restatement below. Some specil is recommendations about policies in the Guide are also presented. General Concerns 1. The City of Renton continues to be concerned about the expansion of suburban development, sometimes with inadequate facilities or at very low densities, in unincorporated areas surrounding Renton. 2. Urb3n development in unincorporated King County has been and is being allowed without providing complete urban facilities and services. Then, as service demands grow, as urban density increases, or when annexation occurs, public facilities must be upgraded, resulting in substantial costs and inefficiency. 3. The City of Renton maintains that urban development does not take place in unincorporated areas without affecting incorporated areas, and vice versa. The impacts of present and future development in unincorporated areas on facilities and services within the City of Renton---especially area-wide facilities such as major arterials and community parks--is significant. While individual dove lopments may represent a small percentage of use for area-wide facilities, the cumulative impacts of present and future growth are a major concern. 4. Continued expansion of special districts throughout the unincorporated area hampers organized urban growth. Therefore, planning for logical service boundaries and for municipal annexations is difficult. The Honorable Randy Revelle, King County Executive Members of the King County Council August 13, 1984 Page 2 5. Incompatible development standards between unincorporated and incorporated areas and the expansion of special districts has led to competition for urban growth and ultimately to urban sprawl. Specific Recommendations 1. The City of Renton specifically endorses the proposed General Development Guide policies related to Open Space, and Environment. The land use policies which integrate new development with environmental constraints, such as wetlands, steep slopes, landslide hazards and other physical limitations, are most constructive. Likewise, the policy approach taken toward agriculture and other resource lands will be instrumental in preserving the rich heritage of King County. 2. Thu City of Renton also supports the designation of long term Urban and Rural areas as proposed in the Guide. These policies will define the limits of urban grcwth and help to focus appropriate services in urban areas. 3. Policy PC-101 identifies local cities as the primary locations of urban growth. Implementation of this policy is necessary to provide the most logical, orderly and cost efficient means of accommodating urban development. 4. The General Development Guide appropriately focuses on the availability of facilities and services to accommodate urban development. Policies PC-202 and PC-203 are crucial to directing the location and timing of growth. The City of Renton strongly supports the concept that facilities and services must be provided prier to or 'n phase with development. 5. However, the General Development Guide should contain specific recognition of the potential impacts to facilities and services in incorporated areas--especially transportation and recreation--that result from new development in unircorporated areas and vice versa. The Guide should stress the need for King County and local cities to cooperatively address this issue. 6. Because of these interjurisdictional effects of growth, the setting of service standards, the verification of available facilities and services, and the allocation of costs called for in policies PC-202 and PC-203 should be accomplished in cooperation with local cities. 7. Policies F-106, F-107 and F-211 linking individual development approval with the provision of adequate on-site and off-site facilities and services are strongly endcrsed by the City of Renton. Now development, both in King County and in the City of Renton, should be provided with adequate neighborhood facilities--such as local streets, sidewalks, developed parks, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, etc.--and with community facilities--arterial streets, major utilil y trunk lines, developed community parks--within the respective jurisdictions. These policies, however, should include reference to the adequacy of facilities, especially transportation, within incorporated areas which serve new development in unincorporated areas. Development approval should also be linked to adequacy or improvements in these facilities in adjacent jurisdictions. r . , The Hono^able Randy Revelle, King County Executive Members of the King County Council August 1;, 1984 Page 3 8. Adoption and implementation of Policies F-112 and PI-302 through PI-306 will represent a major step toward bringing order to the current annexation and service extension process. Recognition of the cities as the preferred service providers within future annexation areas will allow the cities and special purpose districts to plan for efficient and cost effective extension of services. 9. The implementation process set forth in Appendix A is a key to the effectiveness of the General Development Guide. From Renton's point of view. the identification of lcgica! annexation and service boundaries and development of service level standards by King County in cooperation with local cities will form the basis for accommodating urban development in those areas where it is most aF propriate. 10. In this regard, the designation of Urban Growth Centers and the revision of community plans in "candidate" areas is of concern to Renton. In particular, portions of the East Renton Plateau in the Newcastle Planning Area should be considered for higher density development. Proliferation of suburban development at three or fewer units per acre in this area precludes future redevelopment and disrupts the logical extension of urban services. Much of the EEIst Renton Plateau can be served by City of Renton facilities in an efficient and cc st-effective manner. Therefore, this area meets the criteria for residential de velopment in Policy R-201 better than some other areas indicated for higher density growth. 11. In order to facilitate awareness and cooperation between King County and the loi.a1 cities, the City of Renton recommends that the General Development Guide contain a policy calling for mutual solicitation and consideration of formal comments on development proposals that may have service and facility consequences in the adjacent jurisdiction. Thank you for the opportunity to express our thoughts on the General Development Guide. Wo trust these comments, endorsements and suggestions will be useful to the King County Council and Executive in reviewing and implementing the General Development Guide. The City Council has directed the City of Renton Administration and staff to work closely with King County and with other jurisdictions to refine and implement the General Development Guide. We look forward to the positive results of mutual cooperation in this regard. Sincerely , c(z,fr_et,70_,,._ . I Robert J.h lughes, President Renton City Council Attachmer t CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING SUPPORT FOR ADOPTION OF THE KING COUNTY GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE WHEREAS the Executive Proposed General Development Guide establishes goals and polici 3s guiding development throughout King County, in incorporated cities as well as in unincorporated areas, and V1 HEREAS the City of Renton has legitimate concerns about the quality, location, and impal;ts of urban growth within the City and in nearby unincorporated areas, and VIHEREAS, existing and future urban development must be provided with adequate public facilities and services in a logical and equitable manner, and IVHEREAS, the proposed General Development Guide identifies the local cities as the primary service providers for much of the anticipated new growth and the Guide incorpor 3tes many of the other land use concerns of the City of Renton, and JVHEREAS the City Council and staff of Renton have reviewed the proposed General Development Guide, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOL LOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton supports adoption of the Executive Proposed Genera 1 Development Guide and commends the King County Executive and staff for addres;ing the complex urban growth problems which face all of King County. SECTION III: The City of Renton endorses the opportunities for Renton, King Count/, and other local jurisdictions to work together closely to solve mutual urban growt i problems. SECTION IV: The City of Renton acknowledges the many positive elements incorporated in the Executive Proposed General Development Guide and is pleased to find recocnition and inclusion within the Guide of many of the points of view and concerns raised by the local cities. SECTION V: The City of Renton urges the King County Council and Executive to give due consideration to the remaining specific concerns expressed more particularly in a lett€r dated August 13, 1984, from the Renton City Council. S :CTION VI: Both the staff and elected officials of the City of Renton stand ready to work cooperatively with King County and other jurisdictions to solve mutual urban development problems and to assist in implementing King County's General Development Guide. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of August, 1984. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk 1 PPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of August, 1984. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approves as to form: Lawrenco J. Warren, City Attorney . +. . Renton City Council 5/15/84 Page three Ordinances and Resolutions ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second & final reading: Ordinance #3813 An ordinance was read adopting the National Electrical Code, 1984 Electrical 1984 Edition, by reference, and amending Section 4-301 of Title Code IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2544 A resolution was read providing for transfer of funds from Fund Transfer for Library Fund in the amount of $4,300.00 unto Park Fund (General Highlands Library Services Part Time Division) to provide funding for in-house Custodial Service custodial service at the Highlands Library during 1984. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke noted that he has represented the City Public Service Council the past year on the "Government Speaks" panel , Panel a monthly public service program on Cable TV featuring local politicians and civic leaders presenting their views on a variety of topics and responding to letters from the public. The program, presented by 3-H Cable Communications Consultants, is filmed in the Tacoma City Council offices. Councilman Stredicke requested that he be replaced by another Council member as the City' s representative on the panel ; next meeting is scheduled on May 30, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported that the King County Council has begun REPORT a series of public hearings to review County Executive Revelle' s eking County General Development Guide prior to their own deliberations and General Development acceptance, modification or rejection of the plan. The suburban Guide mayors are generally pleased with the guide and, on behalf of their cities, have submitted suggested changes to the final draft. The purpose of the guide is to control and guide growth in the county to prevent urban sprawl , with the major thrust being to encourage urbanization near already developed areas or cities and leave the county rural . Balancing the right of the private property owner to develop his land versus the ability of government to provide basic services is of prime importance. Further review of urban service standards and the role of the Boundary Review Board has been deemed necessary by the Suburban Cities Association prior to its endorsement of the guide, and the Association reserves the right to withhold final approval until the County Council revisions are incorporated. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:34 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk mks%‘yn ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT TO COUNCIL May 14, 1984 County Executive Revelle's General Development Guide is much in the news lately. The County Council has begun a series of public hearings on the document prior to their own deliberations and acceptance, modification, or rejecticn of the plan. The subLrban mayors are generally pleased with the guide and satisfied with the oppertunity for comment prior to the final draft. Most cities asked their planners to critique the proposal . The county was receptive to these efforts and inccrporated many suggested changes into the final draft. The county will grow. Controlling and guiding that growth is the only way to prevent urban sprawl . The difficulty becomes: private property rights vs government responsibility to assure roads, fire/police protection, water and sewers. The major thrust is to encourage urbanization near already developed areas; i .e. , th? incorporated cities, and to leave the county rural . Dave Clenens has been Renton's spokesman and has been acknowledged by his colleagues in the other cities as an authoritative source for critiquing the Development Guide. The Subu •ban Cities Association was prepared to endorse the document; however, further consideration of implementation in areas such as urban service standards and the role of the Boundary Review Board was determined to be necessary. The Association reserves the right to withhold final approval until thi? County Council revisions are incorporated. A copy o = the Development Guide is available for any Councilmember who wishes to review it. cc: Cite Clerk • Renton City Council Page Six November 7, 1983 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance be placed on first reading: Utility Ta) An ordinance was read amending the utility tax rate as it applies Rate Amendment to the privilege of conducting a telephone business to 7.225% effective January 1 , 1984, reduced from 7.4%. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS ORDINANCE BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, SUBJECT MATTERS OF RESTRAINING Referrals to ORDER VIOLATIONS, DRUNK DRIVING PENALTIES AND CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE Public Safety BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Code of Ethics Councilman Stredicke requested the Administration review the Ordinance existing Code of Ethics Ordinance and provide recommendations for necessary changes to Council for their review. He also Political Signs requested information regarding Code provisions relating to retrieval of illegally posted political signs, noting existing retrieval fee should be reduced. Citing conditions of approval Hearing Examiner of the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation on Wick Homes, Inc. Conditions - preliminary plat, File No. PP-035-83, Fernwood North (see Consent Wick Homes, Inc. Agenda) which refer to payment of a unit fee to a park fund for PP-035-83 future development and specific amounts for roadway improvements, Mr. Stredicke asked the City Attorney to research the authority of the Examiner in this matter since systems development charges are no longer imposed by the city. City Attorney Warren indicated the possibility that the referenced conditions were imposed by the Environmental Review Committee during earlier review. Valley General Councilman Stredicke referenced a letter received from Valley Hospital Long General Hospital Assistant Administrator Paul A. Friedrich Range Planning requesting comments by the City Council regarding the final draft of the VGH Long Range Planning process. Mayor Shinpoch announced attendance by Mr. Friedrich is planned at November 14, 1983 City Council meeting to accept Council comments. Northward Rezone Councilman Stredicke requested a status report regarding G. M. R-018-82 (G. M. Associates Rezone (Northward) , pending in Ways and Means Committee. Associates) City Attorney Warren advised that addendum to restrictive covenants has been drafted and will be forwarded to rezone applicants for review and report back. Addendum was prepared to clarify utility line installation requirements. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch distributed copies of a resolution of the Suburban REPORT Mayors' Association addressing the County Executive Task Force King County Report on Growth Management. The resolution represents a joint Growth Management/ effort of all 26 suburban cities and requests King County' s Resolution from attention to urban growth issues at this time when a general Suburban Mayors' development guide will have positive effect. Several policies Association are included and the resolution makes a strong statement to assure that future urban development within the county should occur only within cities and unincorporated areas which will logically be part of a defined future city. Mayor Shinpoch thanked City Council members for their support of the resolution and Policy Development Director Dave Clemens who, along with staff of the cities of Kirkland, Mercer Island, Bellevue, Auburn and Kent, was instrumental in development of the document. Maplewcod Heights Mayor Shinpoch advised receipt of a letter from Mary Merbach, Mainterance Environmental Affairs Chairman of the Maplewood Heights Maintenance Corporation Corporation, regarding drainage in that area of the city. Public Works Director Houghton has been asked to provide a report regarding the function of the corporation to aid the city in future action on this matter. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 0: 10 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk ALGONA )UVALL NORMANDY PARK �ixburb an AUBURN NUMCLAW NORTH BEND BEAUX ARTS IUNTS POINT PACIFIC BELLEVUE ISSAQUAH REDMOND ay ors BLACK DIAMOND KENT RENTON BOTHELL KIRKLAND SKYKOMISH CARNATION LAKE FOREST PARK SNOQUALMIE • CLYDE HILL MEDINA TUKWILA Association DES MOINES MERCER ISLAND YARROW POINT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION OF THE SUBURBAN MAYORS' ASSOCIATION IN KING COUNY, WASHINGTON ADDRESSING THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TASK FORCE REPORT ON GROWTH MANAGEMENT REFERRING TO THE COUNTY'S PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE WHEREAS, King County's proposed General Development Guide sets forth policies concer ling development throughout King County, affecting incorporated and unincoi porated areas alike; and NHEREAS, the Executive Task Force Report on Growth Management provides a compre hensive forum for analysis and comment on the General Development Guide. and NHEREAS, King County cities have legitimate concerns about the location, quality and amount of urban development occuring within and surrounding their cities, and NHEREAS, the quality of urban services within unincorporated areas of King County places a burden upon King County cities to provide services to non-resident populat ions; and NHEREAS, crucial regional and subregional issues of transportation, storm water, solid w iste and the like, are currently unresolved or inadequately funded, and NHEREAS, continued urban growth and development in unincorporated areas will strain t he already scarce financial resources and continue to adversely affect the county's financial health and the quality of crucial services to its cities, and 'NHEREAS, King County cities are better structured by State statutes than County governlnent to efficiently and effectively provide services to urban populations; and 'NHEREAS, the General Development Guide and the Executive Task Force Report places 3mphasis on the need for King County to address its role in protecting the county's crucial rural and resource lands, and 'NHEREAS, the Executive Task Force Report recognizes the need to minimize the current "competition" between King County and its cities on issues of urban growth and develor ment, and 1VHEREAS, the Executive Task Force Report lacks clear guidance on annexation policies and the critical role of the cities in providing urban services. r PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Suburban Mayors' Association of Kinij County recommends the following policies for inclusion in the county's proposed General Development Guide: Economic Development Policy: King County and the cities should play a complementary role in the field of economic growth and diversification and should equally coordinate their efforts with other local and regional economic development groups. II. Land Use - Growth Strategy Policy: King County should strive to define its role in the growth management process by first recognizing the role of its cities as the primary and preferred providers of urban service. Policy: Future urban development within King County should occur only within cities and unincorporated areas which will logically be part of a defined future city. III. Facilities Coordination/Timing Policy• The urban area of King County should be divided into urban service areas for each of the current King County cities and logically anticipated future King County cities. County policy should support annexation to cities or incorporation within the urban service areas. Policy: Within the urban service areas of King County's cities, no future special purpose districts should be established, and existing special service districts should not be expanded. Policy: Upon annexing an area, cities have a responsibility to consider the land use plans and decisions made by King County for the area annexed. Similarly, the County has a responsibility to assure that on-site and off-site development standards (particularly for roads and drainage) are compatible with nearby jurisdictions' standards. This mutual responsibility should be established in agreements between each individual city and King County for specific unincorporated areas on the fringe of a city. PAGE 3 IV. Public Involvement Policy: King County should provide a structured forum to enable greater participation of cities in preparation of the General Development Guide and to enable an on-going dialogue concerning implementation of the Guide and the provision of urban services throughout King County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Suburban Mayors' Association of King Count y urges the adoption of these policies by the King County Executive, the King County Council, and the city councils of each of the county cities. . - DATED THIS SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER. 1983. SUBURBAN MAYORS' ASSOCIATION of King County. Washington President ATTE! T: Secretary ftc , h Renton City Council 5/3/82 Page 3 Audience Comment - Continued Alano Lounge James L. Nelson, 19635 Military Road S, Seattle, spoke on behalf of the South End Alano Lounge, 601 Rainier Ave. S, a facility for social/therapeutic atmosphere for recovering alcoholics and families, operating since 3/15/81 . Nelson noted the economic downturn has not provided paying memberships as anticipated, however, many referrals from Cedar Hills and other treatment centers. Nelson requested funds from the revenue received from the State Liquor Control Boar1,having been advised $9,000 available. Acting Finance Director Bennett reported the City' s share for rehabilitation is paid to King County for the Cedar Hills Treatment Center. Nelson noted increase in unemployed participants and cost of services. Councilwoman Mathews inquired re salaries and was advised Manager paid $300 per month, all others are volunteers. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, REFER SUBJECT MATTER TO THE CITIZEN' S COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT (for report to the Community Services Committee) . CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following business matters are adopted by one motion which follows the items included therein: Final Payment Letter from the Public Works Department recommended final payment LID #321 and accept project 5/3/82 for LID #321 sanitary sewers installed Cascade Septic by Cascade Septic Inc. in the vicinity of NE Sunset and Duvall Ave. NE. Also recommended that 30-day lien period be commenced for release of retained amount if proper documentation for pay- ment of tax liabilities filed and no liens or claims; retainage in amount of $6,737.45. Council concur. Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared May 6, as National Recognition Day for Nurses. King County Letter from the Board of Public Works reported no objection Water Districts to King County Boundary Review Board Notice of Intent for con- Consolidate solidation of King County Water Districts #69, #77 and #88. (Response to Council Referral of 4/26/82. ) Computer Financing Letter from Acting Finance Director Bennett requested acceptance of contract with Wang Industries for new computer. Letter from Wang Laboratories, Inc. , Seattle, listed conditions for the VS-80. Refer to the Ways and Means Committee and City Attorney for review and recommendation. Garbage Rates Letter from Finance and Public Works Departments requested Reduced an ordinance be drafted to implement the new solid waste disposal rates. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Damages Claim Claims for Damages was filed by Kaiser Stevens in amount of (approx. ) $200 for broken windshield allegedly caused by rocks falling from City truck in the vicinity of Rainier exit from FAI 405. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Port Quendall Appeal has been filed by Port Quendall Development Company of PPUD 059-81 the Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision of 4/12/82 regarding Appeal a preliminary planned unit development consisting of a mixed retail , office and hotel use. Location is planned for the west side of Lake Washington Blvd. N between Barbee Mill and Misty Cove Condominiums in the general vicinity of NE 44th St. exit of 1-405. Refer to the Planning and Development Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND MATHEWS, ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Kathy Keolker, President of Renton Hill Community Association, 532 Cedar Ave.S, expressed support of the current proposal to rehabilitate the Holmes Building for a Multi-Service Center; however,noted project proponents indicate parking in the area will not be a problem; residents were assured if impact is greater than anticipated, the management of the building will work to solve the problems. The letter requested the City f 411" 410 Renton City Council 5/3/82 Page 4 Correspondence - Continued Holmes Building consider change in direction of traffic from current one-way Multi-Service going east to one-way west for that section of Third Ave. in Center front of the Holmes Building in order to ease congestion at the intersection. The letter stated the project is an improvement to the downtown core area, gave support and encouraged other groups to do the same. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND MATHEWS, REFER THE REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN TRAFFIC DIRECTION TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented Development committee report re R-3 and R-4 Zoning Ordinances together Committee with definitions as prepared by the Planning Commission. The R-3 and R-4 committee reviewed and amended the ordinances, recommending Ordinances the referral to the Ways and Means Committee for drafting in acceptable form for referral to the City Council . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. Chairman Rockhill explained housekeeping nature of amendments to the zoning code which do not pertain to any matter that is before the Planning Commission nor take into consideration the matter of professional offices in R-3 and R-4 zones. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee Committee report which recommended renewal of the one-year option on the Banking Option Peoples Bank contract. The committee further recommended Authorized the increase of non-interest bearing certificate of deposit by $22,628 to total of $107,270 in order to cover the cost of services on the account. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Software Agreement The committee report recommended authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign agreement with Eden Systems for computer software. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Residency The committee recommended granting waiver of City of Renton Requirement residence requirement for William F. Anderson, Board of Adjust- Waived ment Member. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE REPORT. Stredicke noted for the record Anderson' s business located inside city limits and has moved residency just outside city limits due to closure of mobile home park. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed submitted comittee Committee report re 1982 Community Facility Fund projects reprioritization Community Facility and reported during budget deliberations, Council identified Projects construction of Well #9 ($135,000) as top priority project for Reprioritized Community Facility Funds. The Administration requested the No. 2 Project: Construction ' of Renton High ballfield ($100,000) be moved to the top of priority list because: (1) The School Dis- trict is prepared to begin construction of the ballfield; fund- ing andconstruction can be accomplished incrementally, but some city funds are needed now to assure that job is done properly. (2) Construction of Well #9 will not be achieved for approximately two years. (3) Alternative revenue sources (Referendum #38) may be available for funding utility projects. (4) Community Facility charges are allowed under new state legislation for utility projects; however, departments supported by tax funds must rely on general revenues or future implementation of the 1/4 of 1% increase in the real estate transfer tax for construc- tion of future capital improvements. The committee recommended: the No. 1 and No. 2 priority projects earmarked for Community Facility Funding be listed in reverse order. MOVED BY REED, SECOND MATHEWS, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilman Stredicke requested the record indicate amount of fund and if that fulfills commitment to the project. Acting Finance Director Bennett advised $21 ,000 now available. Mayor Shinpoch advised this does not fulfill entire commitment and does not commit the Council to another $79,000; but does commit the $21 ,000 now available to the No. 1 Project. MOTION CARRIED reversing order of projects. 41110 pF R�� �� ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR 0 CI) MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9A 206 235-2569 0E0 SEP1°5P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH April 29, 1982 MAYOR TO: Barbara Shinpoch, Mayor Members of the City Council FROM: Board of Public Works SUBJECT: King County Boundary Review Board Letter giving Notice of Intention for King County Water Districts #69, 77 and 88 Proposed Consolidation. At the April 28, 1982 Board of Public Works meeting it was determined that there is no objection to the subject matter. t ` TO: 6#41"(-4 DA E: ) FROM: CITY ERK'S OFFIC/E' / SUBJECT: �• �/. Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants THANK YOU! Requested by: 4110 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 26 , 1982 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; ROBERT J. HUGHES, RANDALL COUNCIL MEMBERS ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS AND THOMAS W. TRIMM. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared Youth Week beginning May 1 , Youth Week 5/1 to honor America's Junior Citizens for their service to the com- munity, state and nation. Members of Renton Elks Lodge 1809 were present to receive the proclamation: John Robinson, Youth Activi - ties Chairman, and Lloyd Smith, Exalted Ruler, announced 4/29 meeting with Debate Class from Renton High School and others. SPECIAL Ronald Ringwood representing Municipal Arts Commission, displayed PRESENTATION sample drummer figure and recommended like figure of turn-of-the Century Fire Chief for placement in Fire Station 13, Benson Hwy. , Three-Dimensional under the 1% for Arts Ordinance. Ringwood recalled prior selected Fanciful painting for Station 13 and noted the woodcrafted figure completes Woodcraft Figure the commitment to the site. Upon inquiries, Ringwood noted the artists, Bob and Mary Ray, Orcas Island; the figure will be placed inside the station and is portable for a non-permanent structure, will be bolted to the floor; has evoked strong, positive response from the Firemen. MOVED BY REED, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND SELECTION OF THE MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION FOR FIRE STATION #13. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke recommended placement of plaque. Councilman Rockhill noted for the purpose of future reference, his preference for touchable art objects as The Wise Old Owl in Municipal Building Lobby. AUDIENCE COMMENT Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Ave. S. , displayed map of City with over- lay of old mine shafts and pointed out various housing development Old Mine Shafts expressing fear of sinking and/or cave-ins due to increased traffic Tunneling City Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke fearing prejudging of item which may at a later date come before the Council , City Attorney Warren advised with no Council comment or action, no pre-judging can occur. Keolker explained the map was prepared by Bill Collins associated with the Renton Historical Society who has taken state- ments from former area miners. Keolker pointed out potential prob- lem areas with increased traffic over mine shafts. Police Lt. Persson noted City Building Dept . Staff has map and is aware of potential problems. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Proposed Letter from the King County Boundary Review Board give Notice of Consolidation Intention for King County Water District #69, /177 and #88 proposed Water Districts consolidation; TF //4-l . Refer to the Board of Public Works. Proposed Street Petition wa - filed with the City Clerk for vacation of a portion Vacation NW 4th of NW 4th Street between Stevens Ave. NW and Lind Ave. NW as filed VAC 04-82 Revised by H. C. Grohs , et al . Refer to Public Works Dept. for validation of petition; Board of Public Works for appraisal and utility easement retnetion; Ways and Means Committee for resolution set- ting public hearing June 7, 1982. Previous petition denied by Cite. t (•. unu I I , n f (%I Of) I I I I nU I i•r• w�l i ved !1/I q/r]2 brcaU`,e of Prior t)oYmc RECEIVED 4 APR 2 0 1982 • CITY OF RENTON 73ound ary Review Board CITY COUNCIL King County,State of Washington King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 April 19, 1982. TO ALL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS ADDRESSED: • IN RE: T.F. #4-1 : K.C.W.D. #69/77/88 - Proposed Consolidation The King County Boundary Review Board takes this means of informing all potentially interested parties of Notices Of Intention that are. filed with the Board . The enclosed map indicates the area involved in an action presently pending before this Board. If you feel this action should be reviewed by the Boundary Review Board, you may request review pursuant to RCW 36.93.100(2) . This office will be available on request. Yours very truly, KIN OUNTX BOUN Y REVIEW BOARD 1 �7 ► G. BRICE MARTIN, GBM/pam Executive Secretary Enclosure XC: The Honorable Lois North E, Bruce Laing, Ruby Chow, King County Counci The Honorable City Council ; City of Renton; City of Seattle; City of The Honorable Board of Commissioners, K.C.W.D. #14; #25; #57; #63; #; #125; K,C,F,P,D, #1; #11; #18; #20; #40; Bryn Mawr Sewer District King County Fire Marshall Renton School District #403 South Central School District #406 Seattle School District #1 King Subregional Council Seattle-King County Department of Public Health Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Port of Seattle Washington Surveying E Rating Bureau All King County Boundary Review Board Members BO.\RD Rohert Beach Roger L.Burgess William E.Croake Stanley G.Frey Dnn Cann Kenneth E.Gates Albert P.Haylor Doris A Ell fen Lovett Denese S.Pedersen Henry Sche!Iert STAFF G. Brice Marlin, Executive Secretory Walter F.Webster.Ir.,Specinl Asststrtnt Attorney General Paula Anne Mills Russell, • e l ` • �'�� I I GM I♦ 6 IS L I 1 V RECEFIEDla • o oill Ks,NEVADA •APR 19HZ I` r Q a LAS VEGAS,NEVADA 8 ENGINEERS&PLANNERS o SEATTLE, WASHINGTON t KING I:UUIrIr TWP 23 N., R4E, W.M. BOUNDARY REVIEW _ BOARD T.F. #4-1: K.C.W.D. #69/77/88 - Proposed Consolidation S. 112 th ST. 4-8-82 NE,NE y I I"=800' i I ' I i 26 25 II 23 24 I _-- • �f� i 22 I 21 _ S_116►h ST. 84/ 6>/ N ■ NW,S E, NE 0 ; i ,,, a cry s SW, NW SE NW )$ ///`~ _ S. 118th Srr - vi AI N1bN qV• / RES. c �630628 `SE,SW, NE RES. 601C28 a/ m� • `�///!l.'f!/j1S/-� 7/ ��f/�T}�� _ S. l20/h ST. 240ac. ��� <� kil , . , 7 • N'V,SW S. 122nd ST. [IND v� NE,S W D(--- 1 ; Ir. AD 1 3 K ) 1 19i j1 SKYWAY PAR <, 4 isg . W I/2, NE, a ,�,�" V S E co BLK. B LOTS IA a 2A �P 1 c j IT / BLK. B GJ 1 N A p ip Fs , S. 1241 h ST. .‘40600111, 176 , ..-,f. " r.6"(-1"1-1 7L C 0 �• 'j25�h ST BB ,, • 'bti PO '; <++ , Zzn.: SW,SE • 88 95 aC, SE,SE e ' (f,� A -—.. ko 1 • '01 5� 100 ac. Rn\3�st l?81 h ST. AGE p0P' / I O� ,I S.,1281 �Te�� �Pto I 2 , ' �/ •1.0 4 ILK 3 'i • h 0 �' /`�e .is`��1e6 c� P / 'EARLINGTO ACRE ;1 ~ • .c+ '�''P y1./ c,r, a ' cP�y� j;s1.■ a 61.K 6 6AK?TS ' ,,, 5�•\� JAi' C� LAhGS7DN RD N0.3 1 I 7196-'' cv - ^r ♦ elk I= NE, NE cc ch A LANGSTON R. O LAN STON E�6o C R D. C oD--- suc ,5 er wvz • 1111 ; v) _ EI/2 — S. 132 nd ST. j — Q c to' ' SW, NE t 1 TOTAL AREA MR 435 ACRES . _ . ,�.r,..., ._______ ......... ....,_____ . • ; M RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 26 , 1982 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; ROBERT J. HUGHES, RANDALL COUNCIL MEMBERS ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS AND THOMAS W. TRIMM. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared Youth Week beginning May 1 , Youth Week 5/1 to honor America' s Junior Citizens for their service to the com- munity, state and nation. Members of Renton Elks Lodge 1809 were present to receive the proclamation: John Robinson, Youth Activi- ties Chairman, and Lloyd Smith, Exalted Ruler, announced 4/29 meeting with Debate Class from Renton High School and others. SPECIAL Ronald Ringwood representing Municipal Arts Commission, displayed PRESENTATION sample drummer figure and recommended like figure of turn-of-the Century Fire Chief for placement in Fire Station 13, Benson Hwy. , Three-Dimensional under the to for Arts Ordinance. Ringwood recalled prior selected Fanciful painting for Station 13 and noted the woodcrafted figure completes Woodcraft Figure the commitment to the site. Upon inquiries, Ringwood noted the artists, Bob and Mary Ray, Orcas Island; the figure will be placed inside the station and is portable for a non-permanent structure, will be bolted to the floor; has evoked strong, positive response from the Firemen. MOVED BY REED, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND SELECTION OF THE MUNICIPAL• ARTS COMMISSION FOR FIRE STATION #13. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke recommended placement of plaque. Councilman Rockhill noted for the purpose of future reference, his preference for touchable art objects as The Wise Old Owl in Municipal Building Lobby. AUDIENCE COMMENT Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Ave. S. , displayed map of City with over- lay of old mine shafts and pointed out various housing developments Old Mine Shafts expressing fear of sinking and/or cave-ins due to increased traffic. Tunneling City Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke fearing prejudging of item which may at a later date come before the Council , City Attorney Warren advised with no Council comment or action, no pre-judging can occur. Keolker explained the map was prepared by Bill Collins associated with the Renton Historical Society who has taken state- ments from former area miners. Keolker pointed out potential prob- lem areas with increased traffic over mine shafts. Police Lt. Persson noted City Building Dept. Staff has map and is aware of potential problems. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Proposed Letter from the King County Boundary Review Board gave Notice of Consolidation Intention for King County Water District #69, #77 and #88 proposed Water Districts consolidation; TF #4-1 . Refer to the Board of Public Works. Proposed Street Petition was filed with the City Clerk for vacation of a portion Vacation NW 4th of NW 4th Street between Stevens Ave. NW and Lind Ave. NW as filed VAC 04-82 Revised by H. C. Grohs, et al . Refer to Public Works Dept. for validation of petition; Board of Public Works for appraisal and utility easement retnetion; Ways and Means Committee for resolution set- ting public hearing June 7, 1982. Previous petition denied by City Council and $100 filing fee waived 4/19/82 because of prior payment. • 41011 it '. • Renton City Council 4/26/82 Page 2 Consent Agenda - Continued Surplus Letter from Public Works Department reported gravel screen plant Screen Plant purchased in early 60's to make sand and screenings was no longer used because of cost of manufacturing and requested permission to surplus the plant. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Residency Letter from Building and Zoning Department requested a waiver of Requirement City residency requirement for William F. Anderson, Board of Adjust- ment Member, due to closure of mobile home park. Anderson's new address is 17120 SE 136th St. and business adress continues as 49 Logan Ave. S. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Banking Services Letter from Acting Finance Director requested contract extension with Peoples Bank for banking services. The letter stated the City entered into an agreement with the bank for two years begin- ing 5/1/80 with two successive one-year renewal options. The City provides the bank with a non-interest bearing certificate of deposit in amount of $84,642 to cover their cost to service the account and have requested an increase of $25,000 as their costs have exceeded earnings on the deposit. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for recommendation. Computer Software Letter from Acting Finance Director Bennett presented agreement with Eden Systems for installation of computer software. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for recommendation. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Judith Jensen, 12329 200th Ave. SE, Issaquah in amount of $79.83 for new tire alleging damage due to manhole cover flipped over cutting tire; location of NE 4th St. and Union Ave. NE. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Alex Cordas, 2600 153rd SE, alleging personal injuries at Liberty Park in amount of $25,000. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Court Case Summons and Complaint #82-2-05034-1 by Rose Marie Stone alleging Stone damage to property located Burnett Ave. N, drainage of water result- ing in weakening of bank along Lake Washington Blvd. Claim for Damages filed 8/25/78; asks restore property and correct fault. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Senior Nutrition Letter from Seattle/King County Nutrition Program for the Elderly Program presented agreement with City for continuation of social/nutrition program at the Senior Center. Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign agreement. Consent Agenda MOVED B`/ CLYMER, SECOND REED, ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Approved CARRIED, CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Public Works Director Houghton recommended payment Final Pay Estimate of final estimate due Hydro Systems, Inc. for work performed on Hydro Systems, Inc. the 8" watermain in S 132nd St. from 80th S to 84th Ave. S; amount due contractor $3,309.92. Contract completed 4/2/82; accepted by Utility Division and recommended Council accept completion as of 4/26/82. If after 30 days, no liens or claims are filed against this project and proof of payment of tax liabilities is received, the Director recommended the retained amount of $2,728.93 be paid to the ccntractor. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND MATHEWS, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill advised the committee is continuing study on revision of R-3 and R-4 zones and location of professional offices. Community Services Committee Chairman Reed advised permit for over- head variance has been requested for Monterey Terrace for cable TV. Councilman Stredicke noted area undergrounded previously, connection to be made within few weeks. AA 6 a_..). , . Ili ......___—___- ' R�. E IV ED ' V =Fo., APR 2 0 1982 CITY GF RE�ITON "Boundary Review "Board . CITY COUNCIL King County,State of Washington King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 4196 April 19, 1982. TO ALL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS ADDRESSED: IN RE: T.F. #4-1: K.C.W.D. #69/77/88 - Proposed Consolidation The King County Boundary Review Board takes this means of informing all potentially interested parties of Notices Of Intention that are. filed with the Board. The enclosed map indicates the area involved in an action presently pending before this Board. If you feel this action should be reviewed by the Boundary Review Board, you may request review pursuant to RCW 36.93.100(2) . This office will be available on request. Yours very truly, KIN OUNTY BOUN Y REVIEW BOARD G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary GBM/pam Enclosure XC: The Honorable Lois North & Bruce Laing, Ruby Chow, King County Councilmen The Honorable City Council; City of Renton; City of Seattle; City of Tukwil The Honorable Board of Commissioners, K.C.W.D. #14; #25; #57; #63; #75; #125; K.C.F.P.D. #1; #11; #18; #20; #40; Bryn Mawr Sewer District King County Fire Marshall Renton School District #403 South Central School District #406 Seattle School District #1 King Subregional Council Seattle-King County Department of Public Health Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Port of Seattle Washington Surveying $ Rating Bureau All King County Boundary Review Board Members BOARD Rohert Beach Roger L.Burgess William E.Croake Stanley G.Frey Don Gann Kenneth E.Cates Albert P.Haylor Doris A.Kos Eileen Lovett Denese S.Pedersen Henry Schellert STAFF G.Brice Martin, Executive Secretary Waiter E.Webster.Jr.,Special Assistant Attorney General Paula Anne Mills Russell,Secretary • • • • • • / EXHIBIT a FRECEI 'v IoSP ,NEVADA a 3 LAS VEGAS,NEVADA ENGINEERS&PLANNERS o SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 1 TWP 23 N., R4E, W.M. _ _ T.F. #4-1: K.C.W.D. #69/77/88 - Proposed Consolidation S. 112 th ST_ _-- 4-8-82 . NE,NE 111_8001 27 20 1 1 1' 26 23 24 -_- )I� �i 223 ' 221 I-- S_I16►h ST. 1 N NW,SE, NE le .kWa o I cn S. 1/8 f h ST. vi ,Ss SW, NW SE, Nw ////,A�� - ► _ } • 4' REH r ` I Q' TON 4 / RES. Q �630628 4ISE,SW, NE RES. 601028 a/ 11 �-� - S. 1201 h ST. co 240 ac. \C,�'`� -4" ' 'V 8 13 r S. 122nd ST. , e 'z NE,SW r-----r— - "� NW,SW PARK A�O 2 I9, AY 1. ',3; le W 1/2, NE, Q .. SK" kAv fir•01,...c151 SE e .X. LOTS IA 9 2A P 1 BLK'. g gLK. g 0� t 1 CV t ^ kill ,v -4. of 91 1 h ST �y� s 3 " 4 FS S. 1241 h ST. CP ...,,, ,8 , .v ,... -5 .c . c.G. 1)1.1i S d. j25 t h T. >T} .rr c)• go �• c SE SE lc 4,- PO DS °<k, 223..: S W,S E 9 a c. , (` l' "0 5� 100 ac. 0��51 I o ri 128fh ST - '�� pp0 I - 1I/i�11 L.TiG >iL14, O 1 G,1 / ' P�'y 2 OD aJ B L K 4 BLK 3 �� ` P�' • 'EARLINGTOI ACRE 0 G� �l "�S.ie/�1e6 it,C, RACTS Q J�� Q/ pA 3 d3�Q10�4 t. 31 BLK 5 BLK 6 AC (A 4. ' v �aj0\ �f/iiii /c G '�1 j.AAGSVCIN RD. N0.3 53.96/ lr voi `�' ^/, % ��` ,' .* s�so��sreL�r� NE,NE kk;�, V 1 196 ,'~40 S �' BLK 14 = 1NWI�C�7`4`�,L LANGSTON A LK 13 O ,' E:6o LAN C STON RD. ELK ,CO of Wv2 7 6 eLK 19 eLK 16 17 : h --- E 1/2 1 �. 1 S. 132 nd ST. Q co tol ' SW, NE 1 , • -- 13------L-- . C , -- - WATER DISTmay: 4 +,•a � .. TOTAL AREA 435 ACRES ,t