Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA99-001 „ a CITY C RENTON ..I� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator d June 28, 2001 James R. Pappin 1424 Fourth Avenue, Suite 909 Seattle, WA 98101 Subject: Wong Residence 412 Windsor Way NE Dear Mr. Pappin: This letter is written in response to your correspondence dated June 12, 2001 requesting approval of a reduction of the required 20-foot front yard setback to 15 feet. As presented in your request, the code provision which allows for averaging the front yard setbacks of abutting properties would appropriately apply to this site. Therefore, this Division will be able to grant your request for a reduced front yard setback for the primary structure. The applicable provision (RMC section 4-2-110.D.6) states the following: "A front yard setback of less than 20' may be allowed by the Development Services Division if the average front yard setback of primary structures on lots abutting the side yards is less than 20'. In such case, the front yard setback shall not be less than the average of the front setback of the abutting primary structures; however, in no case shall a minimum setback of less than 20' be allowed for garages which access from the front yard street(s). Modifications to this requirement due to site constraints or lot configuration may be approved by the Development Services Division.” Based on Exhibit A of your letter, the abutting property addressed as 422 Windsor Way has an existing non-conforming front yard setback of 10 feet for the primary structure. In addition, the abutting property to the west (addressed as 410 Windsor Way) complies with the required 20-foot setback. Therefore, based on the provision listed above a minimum front yard setback of 15 feet (average of 10 feet and 20 feet) would be allowed for the primary structure proposed at 412 Windsor Way. The proposal also appears to comply with all other pertinent development standards of the R-8 zone. You may now proceed with applying for the necessary building and construction permits for the revised residential project. 19O14 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 tir Cr This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Wong Residence/412 Windsor way NE June 27,2001 Page 2 of 2 This administrative decision to approve the proposed setback reduction is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, July 12, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact Lesley Nishihira at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, )0d Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Ken & Li Wan Li-Wong, Property Owners Jennifer Henning, Principle Planner Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner Land Use File No. LUA-99-040, V-A Building Permit File No. B000444 qq Law Offices of JAMES R. PAPPIN 1424 Fourth Avenue (206)264-1700 Suite 909 FAX(206)264-1800 Seattle, WA 98101 JRPappin@BuildingLaw.com T r' INNING - 3N JUN 1 5 2000 June 12, 2001 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira Senior Planner Development Services Division—Development Planning City of Renton Renton City Hall—6th floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Mr. Ken Wong and Ms. Li Wan Li-Wong Proposed revisions to building permit at 412 Windsor Way NE Building Permit No. B000444 Dear Ms. Nishihira: Please find attached a proposal for a revised project for the above noted building permit. A portion of this proposal requires a reduction in the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. Accordingly, we request the Development Services Division conduct an administrative review and provide a threshold determination of this application prior to Mr. Wong undertaking full construction documentation. Based on our review of the Renton Municipal Code, we believe this request properly falls within the scope of such a review, and does not require a Variance Application. Project Name: Additions to the Wong/Li Residence Location: 412 Windsor Way NE Renton, Washington Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 2 of 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to construct additions to two areas at an existing single family residence. 1) An addition to the living area that partially expands the existing first floor toward the front yard of the residence (adding approximately 388 square feet) and adds a new second floor, and 2) A new 492 square foot attached 2 car garage addition at the rear of the property. Concept plans for the proposed site, and first and second floor are attached as Exibit B. A break down of building area is as follows: Existing New Project Addition Total Area First Floor 1,330 SF 1 388 SF 1,718 SF New Second Floor 1,544 SF 1,544 SF New Garage 492 SF 492 SF TOTAL 3,754 SF 1. The existing First Floor calculation includes the existing garage. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS The living area addition requires a reduction in the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. The Renton Municipal Code provides for such reductions by administrative decision under Section 4-2-110D.6.2 2 "A front yard setback of less than 20'may be allowed by the Development Services Division if the average front yard setback of primary structures on lots abutting the side yards is less than 20'. In such case,the front yard setback shall not be less than the average of the front setback of the abutting primary structures. . . " RMC, Section 4-2-110D.6. Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 3 of 4 The property immediately west of the subject property (410 Windsor Way NE) conforms to the existing front yard set back requirements. See Exhibit A and Photo 1, attached. Immediately east of the subject property is a public utility right of way approximately 150 feet wide. No residential construction is in the right of way. At 422 Windsor Way NE (the residential property east of the right of way) a significant portion of the residential structure is constructed to within 10 feet of the front property boundary. See Photo 2. This construction includes both living area and a 2 car garage. By averaging the distance between each residential structure and the respective property boundaries between the adjacent lots (#410 at zero intrusion and# 422 at 10 foot intrusion), a 5 foot reduction in the front yard setback of#412 is appropriate. LOT COVERAGE Existing Site: The existing lot is located on the south side of Windsor Way NE and is zoned R-8. The lot area is 6,313 square feet. Existing Residence: The existing single family residence is a single floor structure, approximately 1080 square feet. The existing parking is an attached single car garage, approximately 250 square feet. The existing structure occupies a total footprint of 1,330 square feet, approximately 21% of the total lot Proposed Additions: Addition 1, the living area addition. This addition is primarily at the front and above the existing structure. The front addition enlarges the first floor living room and reconfigures the entry. This addition results in an increase in the foot print of approximately 388 square feet. The second story portion adds living area above both the new and the existing structure. The living area added by this addition is approximately 1,544 square feet. However, there is no increase in footprint by this addition. The proposed additions are all to the living area. The proposed addition requires a reduction in the front yard set back to 15 feet. Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 4 of 4 Addition 2, the garage addition. This addition places a 2 car garage in the rear yard. Access to the garage from the street will be provided by the construction of a new driveway along the east side yard. No administrative variations or special reviews are required for this addition. Coverage calculation. The total footprint of the completed building additions would be 2,210 square feet which results in a lot coverage ratio of 35 %. This lot coverage is within the ratio permitted for lots of over 5,000 square feet. We request that you look favorably on the above request. With your approval, Mr. Wong will prepare revised construction documents for submittal. If you have any questions on the foregoing, we are available at(206) 264-1700. Very truly yours, ames R. Pappin enclosures cc: Mr. Ken Wong and Ms. Li Wan Li-Wong 010612 Renton LN.doc PROJECT DATA BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN N.E. 4TH INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING CRAMER NORTHWEST k Q SITE SURVEY BUILDING DATA: EXISTING 1,330 S.F. / ADDITION 880 S.F. -LAND�.+GAPEJ TOTAL BUILDING 2,210 S.F. (p -A SITE DATA: 1 LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED: RETAINING EXISTING LOT AREA 6,313 S.F. ►ALL TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,210 S.F. TOTAL COVERAGE(TOTAL/SITE) 35 PERCENT 23-� SETBACK DATA: NORTH SIDE MINIMUM SETBACK AT 6'-11" REAR MINIMUM SETBACK AT 39'-10" I SOUTH SIDE MINIMUM SETBACK AT 5'-0" FRONT MINIMUM SETBACK AT 15'-0" DRIYFIYAY GARAGE ADSNT1*4 (442 5.P1 / (-----'b'-II` I EXIST. 1-, \ / ,Ir, .., , {ITT": Hoop F4f10'g.ADDITION(986 5P) STAIR L b'-S'� wNG )' 1 4 AINING 0 ' WANsoR u_�. WAY N.E. 0 5' 10' 20' 40' P_ L 1 PLOT FLAN (/ SCALE: I"= 2O'-O" NORTH 71 . : p .� III! = = N• . s LTA65'34'S0"j. r � I�i� y II'a R 409.30' r' l • : .. .�i L = 468.43' _r . � 11 • �. •. 'PLA PC ( lit1 t _ ..1 �� IIIII �� ► �� #422 C WAY PLE ilia- I ".� 1':V '�•T PC4 . \ i 412 WIND50R 4"X4".CONC MON FND BY HAYDC _ / ;f • O. AF#8203169* • • • • ' ` NS ). *'E ��' PROPERTY BOUNDARY OF PLAT P.I. __ _ 3Lfi�Y��. I FND C�u PLUG 4l1 Oeo• iS13 01 e' ac 1 ' #410 1 ♦ • a ad A•• DELTA = 7313'00* • 7 z: . . • O T = 237.95' SEC cat . . L = 402.89' �_.. .. POINT R.P'S �� ` 4" I. ND BY HAYDON IS S ' k f I "- 0AF#8203169019 IS N 0.15' M PLAT I/ •— \ 11 & W0.15' OF PLAT P.I. 1/16 C R. • �,. -.-.—. WONGN ESTATE 412 WINDSOR WAY N.E. ‘=,. - LEGEND RENTON,WA 98056 _ pq em..�swGn'e rartra • ••� c'�il nak enter III (uo.Tnle.AopnoW mmute J Co ...11c— j /• LP: FND BYHAYDON 1 : 8P\03169019 IS N 0.27' R.A.5 r ®E EDT DA�T. /N. E 0.98' OF PLAT P.I. sow,`"r',LL_ro..er00 DAB 01 »a • ®�S.-ALE =50 r L= N 1GHBORHOO D P LAN EXHIBIT A • RENTON,WASHINGTON ; yy i yy1 y 1 rY1 Y1 II i; i1 1`i i� II i' 1; I �I 11 I 1I i1 ` 3 i 1 I i :1 II 1 :1 11 1 I ii I.11 Ii 11 1 ' i 1 1 i 1 1. J. J1 ii, �.". ��u�' 11 Ii I ; I. I I r...-- :,.;.1.!Imitiisizig. : Il j i �� a i I R / limn: I J ,. I 1 i '_- — _ I i �� ..,... A ! �. !1 , !1 -ter 1, �1 III ;i 1 •1 �1� 1 i 1 i 1• 1 I !11r-'_ 11 -T— T Z 7 7 A ��- ` �'—_- 11 �°" 1 'I -r-T- �■r;r'rd • -...._1 iI wow. Wel ; ; `C'� I ; 1 ... 'a � I 1 I ' I —1.-- 1-1'---- '1 .11/74 ......... .................... it 1 . ._...- WONG/U ESTATE SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4 12 WINDSOR WAY N.E. RENTON,WA 96056 LEGEND ® RC4 ROCKY RlfAR■M MU_ I M HATCH MGM* SCALE 1•20.-0• CONCEPT PLANS 4,...1414.494'Y1.1.42AR. EXHIBIT B RENTON,WASHINGTON t.. • kF ✓I t • i _ . Ili.. (4 _,.: . I'f t ili ' life 41 • •f • 3. K !;:,?''' .• � ' � , ' j a`te0 -49' , ,.r ; - Ullyi ' ,.'..,„,,4 , , Iv. , 4 itx,,,, -.. ., . ,i, .. . t. ,. 0,i,,,,,-, • . . . 4 ' . ,.. . •. z., . . .,„ ,. . ,.„„..,,,,..„ . ... . , ,... . ...,. r-4 ,-- • i> . ..:'.., - — .. - 0 /O.' A... . , . rif I (10,,, 00•001 .-:`-'' ...4.,;,>.: f!1' Alill 7: .. O � / • }�"� • V ^ - , A t.,: .) ili.,'' ,�'' 3 ,�,.. ,,•.--'- .++„ ,.'.«,:11'� .,•: -'-.',c ,�..... sa ..j. k _ .r; wti., q.8't s at,' { M1 • ..tr rr� � .. �'-� ..,� ';‘,,it;.'-;. r .F:;- sar., .,.x::r...r.--v., x,:_,�r• ,,w-> .y . •••••:•,7:0•7.4.....y ro.a�e,g' ;. a;#. •It t"'- ...laa ._,,a 7 .4E- F.,w.H ' „� gyrdN r�'y�..d`44; rv-.�+ ,.. 5 ':>.t t• � : , � .. �s., at.�` "' �J�x • 1� :i�'' , a;G" a •••-.. ?. :'� - ,ucx 4'." ••••.F .viz, •- ,. ,'A. i r�"?h� F E:,P' my� ,t. �' ?"•'t - ' - .nn".d-.«:k '.9V,kr ok. .,.''.— " : , .r:. ,R., . d=' .• .:�, ...„...: ,,,1',„ ''k?�x I •,,,'.F •..„,a, • yy,x+ r . ew fir. , L,' •. -... n4x ,. ,...,' _.,. ;ey:,:xi ,..: �4 -fin - P.yx ,6..-„.n 4'1N. y. .. w tt. �w +J' . , + „ ..n ,iq=' xk ,-,..k"A.. .• •hs. .{.•. x,_ 'e7t as �+.Jr: `f....7 it '}'"+w- - t SM spr,... , '". .. +, ?E a � " 'YPI'?9t'o-t i °:.. '' '. �` '"�C �; i, ,s 4 r.. '^'e 5 f t. .. Vik9øJ*1 ID 'LAY - • __. ___ .. ..... .+ , , _.. .. . . • .. __•;,7:--,,, - . .. ...... • ...,, ,.. . • !, ,,, ,114 ..":y .p, dt 1. .••�' - .‘,.. •a. 4.11IP. , -. .. s'i !AI""�r " + ii wi : i f • 1, ellIMINIIIMPIIIMadmilli s c � - =yam Cr _ ..,T,�- _ �ii7/ fl{AF�1/ c �-14 ;.. '.,.. ....V '.•., - a�rrc. .,.p ; •... - ,-;••• -;, .4. ig . :,./-.4 ..'. ,.•:.-',:.,!*-, ` FR • VIEW t hQ { _ i ' g .....-' A. :;;-:-'-fr'-'' f.'':.7"-..;-.4-:-:-.-.":,.i --0.4irult N it, •,' •_. - . -- .I,, . , ..... .., _17,...,1 a 0, ,_ ...; .fit,.• ....':',1,,• .-.4....., ' . ' , • . 1:-...:•-• :h. r .� .S 3 - = ICE ,z, , .4 lift .."- ' 'r SIDE VIEW q �� . qq -• r / l Law Offices of JAMES R. PAPPIN 1424 Fourth Avenue (206)264-1700 Suite 909 FAX(206)264-1800 Seattle, WA 98101 JRPappin@BuildingLaw.com • 'INNING )N JUN 1 5 2000 June 12, 2001 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira Senior Planner Development Services Division—Development Planning City of Renton Renton City Hall—6th floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Mr. Ken Wong and Ms. Li Wan Li-Wong Proposed revisions to building permit at 412 Windsor Way NE Building Permit No. B000444 Dear Ms. Nishihira: Please find attached a proposal for a revised project for the above noted building permit. A portion of this proposal requires a reduction in the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. Accordingly, we request the Development Services Division conduct an administrative review and provide a threshold determination of this application prior to Mr. Wong undertaking full construction documentation. Based on our review of the Renton Municipal Code, we believe this request properly falls within the scope of such a review, and does not require a Variance Application. Project Name: Additions to the Wong/Li Residence Location: 412 Windsor Way NE Renton, Washington • Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 2 of 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to construct additions to two areas at an existing single family residence. 1) An addition to the living area that partially expands the existing first floor toward the front yard of the residence (adding approximately 388 square feet) and adds a new second floor,and 2) A new 492 square foot attached 2 car garage addition at the rear of the property. Concept plans for the proposed site, and first and second floor are attached as Exibit B. A break down of building area is as follows: Existing New Project Addition Total Area First Floor 1,330 SF 1 388 SF 1,718 SF New Second Floor 1,544 SF 1,544 SF New Garage 492 SF 492 SF TOTAL 3,754 SF 1. The existing First Floor calculation includes the existing garage. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS The living area addition requires a reduction in the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. The Renton Municipal Code provides for such reductions by administrative decision under Section 4-2-110D.6.2 2 "A front yard setback of less than 20'may be allowed by the Development Services Division if the average front yard setback of primary structures on lots abutting the side yards is less than 20'. In such case,the front yard setback shall not be less than the average of the front setback of the abutting primary structures. . ." RMC,Section 4-2-110D.6. Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 3 of 4 The property immediately west of the subject property (410 Windsor Way NE) conforms to the existing front yard set back requirements. See Exhibit A and Photo 1, attached. Immediately east of the subject property is a public utility right of way approximately 150 feet wide. No residential construction is in the right of way. At 422 Windsor Way NE (the residential property east of the right of way) a significant portion of the residential structure is constructed to within 10 feet of the front property boundary. See Photo 2. This construction includes both living area and a 2 car garage. By averaging the distance between each residential structure and the respective property boundaries between the adjacent lots(#410 at zero intrusion and# 422 at 10 foot intrusion), a 5 foot reduction in the front yard setback of#412 is appropriate. LOT COVERAGE Existing Site: The existing lot is located on the south side of Windsor Way NE and is zoned R-8. The lot area is 6,313 square feet. Existing Residence: The existing single family residence is a single floor structure, approximately 1080 square feet. The existing parking is an attached single car garage, approximately 250 square feet. The existing structure occupies a total footprint of 1,330 square feet, approximately 21%of the total lot Proposed Additions: Addition 1, the living area addition. This addition is primarily at the front and above the existing structure. The front addition enlarges the first floor living room and reconfigures the entry. This addition results in an increase in the foot print of approximately 388 square feet. The second story portion adds living area above both the new and the existing structure. The living area added by this addition is approximately 1,544 square feet. However,there is no increase in footprint by this addition. The proposed additions are all to the living area. The proposed addition requires a reduction in the front yard set back to 15 feet. Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton June 12, 2001 Page 4 of 4 Addition 2, the garage addition. This addition places a 2 car garage in the rear yard. Access to the garage from the street will be provided by the construction of a new driveway along the east side yard. No administrative variations or special reviews are required for this addition. Coverage calculation. The total footprint of the completed building additions would be 2,210 square feet which results in a lot coverage ratio of 35 %. This lot coverage is within the ratio permitted for lots of over 5,000 square feet. We request that you look favorably on the above request. With your approval, Mr. Wong will prepare revised construction documents for submittal. If you have any questions on the foregoing, we are available at (206) 264-1700. Very truly yours, ames R. Pappin enclosures cc: Mr. Ken Wong and Ms. Li Wan Li-Wong 010612 Renton LN.doc PROJECT DATA BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN NE 4Th INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING CRAMER NORTHWEST CIIt SITE SURVEY BUILDING DATA: EXISTING 1,330 S.F. / ADDITION 880 S.F. fSS,�J TOTAL BUILDING 2,210 S.F. 2 SITE DATA: LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED: W NIN& EXISTING LOT AREA 6,313 S.F. TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,210 S.F. TOTAL COVERAGE(TOTAL/SITE) 35 PERCENT 23'-41 , SETBACK DATA: NORTH SIDE MINIMUM SETBACK AT 6'-11" REAR MINIMUM SETBACK AT 39'-10" SOUTH SIDE MINIMUM SETBACK AT 5'-0" DRIVEMAY FRONT MINIMUM SETBACK AT 15'-0" 6ARA6E ADDITION / 5'46 �6'—I I t�sx) EXIST. 1 i 5MOD HOUSE ADDITION(see SP) wrr -6-8 � TAIR wl6 11111 n kli/ Now IVr N. 0 5' 10' 20' 40' FL.QT FLAN C\i^ SCALE: 1"= 20'-O" NORTH . • 0 r rAND I - i . . . . k . INDSOR V ... . . s s. , . ......„ . . • . • .• ., .. I, 'N S • ' . • .4• A r ' • e, i .. . t • • 1 ir .,-OF MIL 4 • , • . • . 4 . . • • 1Nt 14. .. • „ . 1 . ' • Ale '' . . . . , .• , .• " •..• . . 'V. .. • •A -''''':.\ .7..,_ .. . ,. • . ,...........--w., - . , _ .... 4igriffiiiiak _ - • , 1111iMil 1 1 .. ....____ • . 111 6 f - - . . _ .. - • - 'IriC". 1 MIXO);Al 1 1111vAlaVi . . . . . . _.....„4. ....„ . ,..id. ..., .,,. .. -c.,..0. . . No . •. ..• ' ... ...,,4.•• - -02 11011 1,... •- , I . Iv;• . —41111L .' ivy.. :- •- -..* •••... 1 - ''.C,'''Ir .. • 4."'....;. • 11601i 4 , . . . . . ._ : , A . ....1 i. '4, ',• ..e 1 • • . . i- -117 $ "' --a. 0' ..- .9, .. . i . ..4 eg;111r. IN-If • -. . , . . . _ . .ar ... ._ - , I ... . • . .. I . :...., allP0111110"..1"400, • ts . . . • 4 , .--• . •- ..-. _ . . . Ii.p . .. 422 iiiiiiitiejwit ,T_� 1 �,.., . Ans. _ J, ` . ` •+'r' l I• . ,.. or � r )1 Milrilrigrar �. � , 4 "VW *Ili,i• . F - ` y ti 1 - -.=� _ __ .,� ...4 . ; . ' s �._ ` .41.4 . r •) • • r ty •' • .y r .,r a • %, .111t• - '4'i ariltilL,-tk. • •lelim....1 3 h yr+f` • r b '10 INV ' 01111. .... 0. t. ;ill,»y11 a'A'i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al RENTONN HEARING EXAMINERGTO publishedg RENTON.WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months • An Appeal Hearing will be held by the prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County meeting in the Council Chambers on the seJournal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the Way, Renton,h floor City Hal, 1 on5 So.A Grady PP gby P Way, Washington. April 27, State of Washington for King County. 1999, at 9:00 AM to consider the following ` The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County petition: APPEAL Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers WONG/LI VARIANCE during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a AAD-9$-045 The appellant, Ken Wong, appeals the denial of an administrative variance Appeal: Wong/Li Variance request for reduction of the required front yard setback from 20 ft.to 14 ft. The pro- posed project (File No. LUA-99-001,V-A) as published on: 4/16/99 is for an addition to an existing residence. Location:412 Windsor Way NE. The full amount of the fee cha for said foregoing u_blication 's t m of$34.50, Legal descriptions of the files noted 9 g above are on file in the Development charged to Acct. No. 805106 Services Division,sixth floor, City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Legal Number 5972 / Publication Date:April 16,1999 Published in the South County Journal April 16, 1999.5972 a C , South y urna Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of_ filL1, 19 5 G`tt9c11• Io kk KLO_D---y--_-Yh:—; *;or'Z Notary Public of the State of Washington Q•�' oia^r . ' residing in Renton so— King County, Washington NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on April 27, 1999, at 9:00 AM to consider the following petition: APPEAL WONG/LI VARIANCE AAD-99-045 The appellant, Ken Wong, appeals the denial of an administrative variance request for reduction of the required front yard setback from 20 ft. to 14 ft. The proposed project (File No. LUA-99-001,V-A) is for an addition to an existing residence. Location: 412 Windsor Way NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, sixth floor, City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Publication Date: April 16, 1999 Account No. 51067 AADPUB.DOC 1.1Y0qq- • bEVELOPMENT PLAINTN^ CITY OF REN1DN March 14, 1999 MAR 16 1999 Jana Huerter,Acting Zoning Administrator RECEIVED Municipal Building—6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON Re: Wong/Li Estate Addition&Remodel LUA-99-001,V-A 412 Windsor Way N.E. MAR 1 61999 Renton,Washington 98056 RECEIVED Dear Jana Huerter: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I am writing to you in regards to the above Administrative Variance Application. I received the Report&Decision for the Administrative Variance Application stated the variance is denied. The Report&Decision Document was reviewed and found that the"Findings"stated are incomplete and mislead. The following are the brief summary of the issues,which I brought up during the pre-application process and verbally during the variance application process. I believed these issues have not been reviewed thoroughly by planning technician: 1. There is property located at 412 Windsor Way NE that had construction in recent years. This property has similar design of double garages facing Windsor Way NE. It has two stories height of double garages at ground level with living space directly above,and has less than 20'-0"setback from public sidewalk. 2. Design Option#2 is possible if the existing utility/light pole and existing bus stop relocate to another location. One side of the garage which is having difficulty meeting the 20'-0"setback could be located at the northeast corner of the site. The separation of the garages cause inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity. The final location of the utility/light pole and bus stop after relocation remains unclear. It is required to relocate the utility/light pole to adjacent property to allow access to the site. There is possible inconvenience to local community could result from Design Option#2. 3. Planning technician suggested utilizing the space at the existing garage to allow two(2)cars deep garage to meet the required setback would require extensive soil excavation to lower the existing garage. The additional soil excavation calculated of approximately 66 cubic yards could unstable the hill slope at the back of the properties and causing land slide in the future. 4. The issue of hazard to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic had discussed and addressed during the pre- application process. Structure(garage and living space above)originally designed for 5'-0"setback revised to 14'-0"setback at corner. The revised clearance between public sidewalk and the garage door which is closer to the property line is 15'-6",which according to automobile industry standard,is sufficiency and safe for back-out distance for driver. I concluded that the planning technician's suggestions could impose potential hazards and possible lawsuits in the future. I am requesting an appeal for the above application. I have enclosed the$75.00 fee. Please forward other specific requirements mentioned in the report to the project address stated above. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Ken Wong Property Owner City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:i'�dvx Rev yew COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-001,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 1999 APPLICANT: Ken Wong PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira ' UF " IVT.O , PROJE'.T TITLE: Wong/Li Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78476AA, 7 LOCAT ON: 412 Windsor Way NE /99S SITE AREA: 6,313 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,297 sq.ft. v L'7 DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Ken Wong, is requesting approval of an administrative variance from the R-8 development standards. The proposal is for an addition to the existing house which will have a front yard setback of 14 feet. The R-8 zor e requires a minimum of 20 feet for the front yard setback. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemen'of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environ vent Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation I _ Environnental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural i?esources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet N P �� i' U l e. v-v15 N 0 t e.cA -fc>r (4, l B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS v5 d T-r -.- {- d.f t \--1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additi n inforntati,n is feededprope assess this proposal. / r Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 'te / DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/C City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CotA IC. % COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-001,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 1999 APPLICANT: Ken Wong PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley NishihiraCrp`PROJE:7,T TITLE: Wong/Li Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78476 O� LOCAT ON: 412 Windsor Way NE /RE,ON SITE AREA: 6,313 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,29l,sq.ft 07 y SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Ken Wong, is requesting approval of an administrative van f m the§-8 development standards. The proposal is for an addition to the existing house which will have a front yard 44 feet. The R-8 zone requires a minimum of 20 feet for the front yard setback. /ON A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemenr of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Enviror ment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/SI oreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environ nental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. P:)LICY-RELATED COMMENTS / YL';VC- - C. C DDE-RELATED COMMENTS We hays reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where a clitional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ignatuie of Direc r Author Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC /2' Rev 101, City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ewe Freva 4twv COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-001,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 1999 APPLICt\NT: Ken Wong PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Wong/Li Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78476 LOCATION: 412 Windsor Way NE SITE AF'.EA: 6,313 sq.ft. l BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,297 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Ken Wong, is requesting approval of an administrative variance from the R-8 develop Went standards. The proposal is for an addition to the existing house which will have a front yard setback of 14 feet. The R-8 zon requires a minimum of 20 feet for the front yard setback. A. EMVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LanciShc reline Use _Utilities Animals Transportation Environn ental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural f esouroes Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /64 C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS 4 We havE reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where auditional information i ee ed to properly assess this proposal. y 7 9 ? . Signati r of Director or Authorized Repr entative Date DEVAPP Rev 10/93 City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 8` ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE DECISION LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE March 3, 1999 Project Name Wong-Li Variance Applicant Ken Wong & Li Wan Li-Wong File Number LUA-99-001, V-A Project Manager Lesley Nishihira Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of an administrative variance from the required front yard setback in the R-8 zone (section 4-2-110A). The R-8 zone requires a 20 foot setback from the structure to the front property line. The applicant is proposing a reduction of this setback to 14 feet in order to constru an addition to the existing single family residence. Project Location 412 Windsor Way NE Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 1,297 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area 2,677 square feet Site Area 6,313 square feet Total Building Area gsf 3,974 square feet Veti �' 1 F ,' L ") UNPLAT TED 'd,. e'p•• hl! (eat •, x.,1 11.M L.0 .: ..Y it S. 4 i 5 ./ 6)µme'• w T•1 y1. iC , • ' is,5! y r 1 Ss,♦ .,� ..BRONSON W4 ,� I ' Lail t• C) 00 / /,, ,r S en 7, 30 (4,,,,,,t4,9 ,.02( fl P6 . ., till 2 j `,› ',.S iR T •- py �r % z: _ t\� :F r u e . .� 0� is ` �,ie ` r•Y` �� 14 6: 7.i• 6 q 1 :, �. I k 14 1NoSOR''� 9 ��!1-5, or/ . YE, ,,, '- ':-__ :,,i.L illy � t{ - if' :! l;iy ;.:is•�14 l.;Y <-p.ry ./"'fyclltlr'/P� 'I Oare H L: , o £,,, ;'i r T' N m ?;s�r^2 - ] apt <, q6 •s +c • w ,,J•. Z.• > L • �c r 7 a.- y1P P , q_ 4 ./ . •\ ,Sow S 4M t; E '' 11 i' , A • 4 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report WONG-LI VARIANCE LUA-99 001, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 3, 1999 Page 2 of 5 A. Type of Land Use Action Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Developm Permit Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination x Administrative Variance B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received January 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received January 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevations (Received January 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Floor Plans (Received January 4, 1999). C. Project Description/Background: The applicant, Ken Wong, is requesting approval of an administrative variance from the required front yard setback in the R-8 zone (section 4-2-110A). The subject site is located at 412 Windsor Way NE. The site is bounded by NE 4th Street on the south and Windsor Way NE on the north. The development standards of the R-8 zone require a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet. The setback is measured from the property line to the closest point of the structure. The applicant is proposing a reduction of this setback to 14 feet in order to construct a 2,677 square foot addition to the existing 1,297 square foot single family residence. The proposal will maintain the existing structure's 47 foot rear yard setback as well as the existing side yards of 5 feet on the west and 10 feet on the east. The proposed structure will have a lot coverage by buildings of approximately 28%. The proposal meets the required height, lot coverage, and rear and side yard setbacks of the R-8 zone development standards. The applicant contends that in order to construct an addition to the existing home, a reduction of the front yard setback is necessary because of the lot's irregular shape and the slope in the rear of the property. In addition, the location of the existing bus stop and light pole in front of the northeast corner of the site as well as the limitation for access via NE 4th Street preclude any alternative design of the structure. ADMVARD.DOC\ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report WONG-LI VARIANCE LUA-99 001, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 3, 1999 Page 3 of 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicant, Ken Wong, has requested approval for an administrative variance from the required front yard setback in the R-8 zone (section 4-2-110A) for the property located at 412 Windsor Way NE. 2) Administrative Variance: The applicant's administrative variance application complies with the requirements for information for a variance. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 thru 5. 3) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: single family residential; South: church; East. Puget Power ROW, single family residential; and West: single family residential. 4) CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA Section 4-31-19F.3. lists 4 criteria that the Zoning Administrator is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. These include the following: The Zoning Administrator shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant contends that special circumstances apply to the subject site which impose limitations on the area on which he can build an addition to his home. The rear yard of the site is constrained by a steep slope leading up to NE 4th Street and the front yard is cut at an angle due to the curve of Windsor Way NE. However, there are a number of other properties in the vicinity that have these characteristics in common with the subject site. Therefore, there are not any special or unique circumstances which apply only to the subject property. The applicant claims a new driveway at the northeast corner of the site would allow for the design of the structure to meet code requirements, but is not possible because of the existing utility pole located in front of the property. However, staff's contact with Puget Sound Energy found that the relocation of the utility pole is a strong possibility and would serve as a reasonable alternative if the redesign of the structure were to fall within the code provisions. (The applicant would need to obtain a cost estimate - includes labor and materials - from Puget Sound Energy.) ADMVARD.DOC\ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report WONG-LI VARIANCE LUA-99 001, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 3, 1999 Page 4 of 5 Furthermore, the redesign of the addition to meet the required setback is entirely possible by utilizing the buildable portions of the rear yard or possibly eliminating a portion of the proposed garage. The R-8 code provisions allow a minimum front yard of "15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the front yard street(s) - (only) along streets created after September 1, 1995." The intent of the code provision as it applies to garages (e.g., adequate parking room and backout distances for vehicles) does not allow for the reduction of the setback for an attached garage accessed from the front yard. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The granting of the variance would possibly result in direct materially detrimental impacts to the public welfare. The front yard requirement of the R-8 development standards is intended to provide a continuous setback fronting streets in residential neighborhoods. Not only does the setback provide for an aesthetic streetscape, but it also functions as a visual buffer between residences and the public street. The reduction of this requirement would create a hazard to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic due to the insufficient backout distance proposed. Although there are existing garages within the required front yard setback, the existence of unsafe conditions elsewhere in the neighborhood would not justify creating additional potential hazards. It may also be considered injurious to property improvements in the vicinity and zone because it would allow for construction that differs from the standards that generally apply to all properties in the R-8 zone. This would set a precedent and create uncertainty about maintaining zoning standards which have been adopted to protect and enhance residential neighborhoods. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Approval of the variance may be considered a grant of special privilege because it would provide an exception from a zoning standards that limits most properties under the same zoning designation. The applicant's submittal includes photographic documentation of adjacent properties and their setbacks from Windsor Way NE. Although the adjacent properties do have existing garages within the required setback, they pose potential hazards to pedestrian and vehicular traffic and cannot justify the construction of additional potential hazards. d. That the approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The approval of the proposal is not the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose of constructing an addition of the size proposed. It is possible to redesign the structure to satisfy the code provision by either reducing the size of ADMVARD.DOC\ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report WONG-LI VARIANCE LUA-99 001, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 3, 1999 Page 5 of 5 the garage or utilizing the buildable area of the rear yard. The relocation of the utility pole to allow for an alternative design of the structure is also an option. E. Conclusions 1. The subject site is located at 412 Windsor Way NE, within the Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) zoning designation. 2. The R-8 zone requires a minimum 20 foot front yard setback from the street (section 4-2-110A). The applicant is proposing a reduction of this requirement to 14 feet. 3. The analysis of the proposal according to variance criteria is found in the body of the Staff Report. F. Decision The Administrative Variance for the Wong-Li Variance, File No. LUA-99-001, V-A, is denied. SIGNATURE: Janaa Huerter,Acting Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED thIS 3rd day of March, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Ken Wong&Li Wan Li-Wong 412 Windsor Way NE Renton,WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of March, 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the date of approval. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). An appeal to the Hearing Examiner is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 17, 1999. Any appeal must be accompanied by a $75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADMVARD.DOC\ Ofe#i scirplsRi 1es9si a ;'7'1;1vgs D 11210111111111111iiiiiilillinill CD rn If II 4 i ii 11 Fx ,t aillimal'i`spp3aaloi'31imi KEmiei -�.-4 N al t ff . .; l� e, It '-0 t;A./' oliLl ,, 1II ! 1 MI r (SI rtr1 ; ,. — r 10 ., �/;,it' � �z i lip v U) o -- 1 i;` i .o m 1 °VisZstarsiRmn hl-. 4.......... ; i i'a !/I I is lfo II I 0 —I 14Z d %1 Z Z v Qrn !° s 'i i u Z I 11 qO er 0 TA Z :. . J/oi —0 0 ... i 4 . cl.,::;,. ,; . 1 , : ; f i : , . , - iii 1 rinj D. o 'r' '•—ss�_8 4"' I 4. .. z IA b • y L _ • 41.111.9 • G) cn nROJZT PO SIM►V.M/OtTeRAL NOTES v. .KIN pep. w. ADDITON / REMOD ""...«"" ...... �......� '� �. 412 WINDSOR WAY r Wong / Li Estate �G141 RENTON. WASHINGTON 98056 __ __ .._ _ LEGEND I M.aL •w Mt MOO•r•L WY OS a se n.I ra+uasrc .N'MIl•OD•r•6.WO• r a Me MO•aw rl•xr.r Mt.rs•rx r.• I as• - - rMll.a•NI.w IV OM IT arensws r.wr. UMW MY.•WMI-MO •rac r r.411I101•M6.[ r Moos w h 6 E X• EFf —i-........--=--=--___---1. i i i 1 I I rIf r i i 1• . Pill j i i / . • —� • -mfir II o s e 511 t . II _ : O O.ii..- 271' '...211 O O 1 f � 7 -`i I' - :�o &Or ITRE, I tIE iT !- -ilia _ v p 1 grill +2011 d� i 1 Tim. l' w e..y ! G I ...mu. s.—•.W.W1 - Q Z • o o •r. ¢ — bo o _«.M o = 0 5' 10' 20' 40' N N -1 F—^� 0 5' io' 20' 40' F Z_ < LJ t1 0 3 z i ^ o EXISTING/PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN Irli SCALE,r.20'-0• 4GRTM SCALE:1•.2O'-0• NOe'H i A-1 I l fjit :I; ill iit 0118: ll IP 1 i f al 1. is I d I I ':::: !'';i�� ■ ,+,', �'1riil',�ir;`'. n■■■u FF,1? I?!�+,li?Ii'I!rtli;: E MIM l' Yolk/in 1 - 1' . II I ' i ■11■■■ • -,I ■■■■■ I: S I I • : :: •I11111I '•. —4 1 I 11111111.':' II;I Ili \ TIME'—. Il j-.:1. ' • I ®I lij711 , 111101 ::11111: :: • I l 1 ,�Sgf_ i;'i'h;;0h: 'irf kr74�' IIII ___ !, ,:, ; , ✓'ir , .' I ff1' x 1 I 1 il 1 111 $iii 1 il 301MY N r*.•re z...... ju9 li i a i� i :'s rr✓r Ylll �i I 1 I 1 1 - - y� 1 C- J- Cd 'Y''''':'.PA:1Z=7 C;:.:,i,i,i,i,i,i. 11 ,lill.Ii 1 1 1 F i1 -rII M I /l 1 I I / ../ M■■xw R ys J, ti, 1 rr I;lyy; I;s:.,r�1�n;.l..�.;I�:..yJ��l,. ,;;I;'rl :.:.:.:.:.$. - -s'`` = ' a qp? j9 i yl{ i f P R P a . P H Ya 1 i j1 1 ie 9 Q]fa 1 y 4 T ADDITON / REMODE ` •��• "�� N412 WINDSOR WAY N. Wong / Li Estate - /11124 p RENTON, WASHINGTON 98056 R' • • 4Gti�Y o� � c� NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Muter Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-001,V-A/WONG/LI VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicant,Ken Wong,Is requesting approval of an adminisstralive variance from the R-8 development standards. The proposal Is for an addition to the existing house which will have a front yard setback of 14 feet.The R-8 zone requires a minimum of 20 feet for the front yard setback. PROJECT LOCATION: 412 Windsor Way NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Variance(V-A) Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihlra,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 22,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact Ms.Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits wdlten comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: January 04.1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 07,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: January 07,1999 ii _i I mot:,. r�,d* 9,.=:4i qi,ee� dA 44 Pf�- i i �t;,�E `" > 9.` 3 r l V 1 jp w'T r . a7 % (fin • r . ,rTE;r p ,r •A - i• rr011C W.000 CERTIFICATION I, „e 1.x ,_Nrbilfirl YA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document 'ere posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on vjAAA,i ?A,p,vox J .), 16(9 ei • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed an worn before me, a Nortary Public, in and the State of Washington residing ' , on the c day of 'q ------7'il Ce}4- 7151-7.2 (.6.4, MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 a CITY F RENTON ..� Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 7, 1999 Mr. Ken Wong Mulvanny Partnership Architects 11820 Northup Way, Suite E-300 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Wong-Li Variance Project No. LUA-99-001,V-A Dear Mr. Wong: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 477-Sb Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Li-Wong/Owners ACCPTLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 1 60 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ( CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: MWq/L/'liSr%Ois/Gr 4 Z)D/74i / k/f D (- APPLICATION NO: LUR t _00i V- A T le following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) I 1 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, < die , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) ```„tiiiii1/i/, owners and their addresses were obtained from: ``��t .. 0F,�j,, ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Record$ .. off` Ai�+•�� ❑ Title Company Records ? /' �' NurA ��►".: 9 [� King County Assessors Records = • • moo.y = =•9 AUBLIt Signed .". g Date L ��lA..' 6 0p'.4Z0 (Applicant) ��4i00�WASH,�4 %`` NOTARY iIi ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Not ry Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the (4( day of SP 199-//Signed /er.:!,,/,,joix '`'?,,""' �_ otary Public) For City of Renton' Use."" '` ::... . . CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, *iGL , hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City;Employee each listed property owner on 1 1 Signed it k .eay,a _ Date NOTARY ATTES tribe and sworn before me a of r Public in and for the State of Wash on Y , residm at art onthe ,' dayof 1g • Signed_ listprop.doc MARILYN E<A REV 07/95 r:1;°-' COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 * BATCH NUMBER: PO COMMENTS CUSTOMER NAME KEN WOVE , * 4******](<I()C**f<{<**8*yc***$**f<f<Y<*f<*Y,<f<*t(< <f<f<(k* ;<(<f< (< k{<(<*f<*f<*Y<Y<Ycfc*;<{<Y,<*sjc Y<**fc**** :</ci<*i<** 082305-9054-06 082305-9054-06 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX DEPT PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 BELLEVUE WA ggn09 082305-9170-05 082305-9170-05 PACCAR INC 301304 PACCAR INC 3D1304 ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING PO BOIX 1518 PO BOIX 1518 RFLL=VUE WA 98009 BELLEVUE WA 98009 172305--9131-02 172305-9131-02 FIRST UNITED METH CHURCH 612777 FIRST UNITED METH CHURCH 612777 2201 NE 4TH 01649-001 2201 NE 4TH 01649-001 RENTON WA 98C55 RENTON WA 98055 947620- 0205-05 947620-0205-05 OLIVER S 0 201276 OLIVER S 0 201276 43: BRONSON WAY N E 433 BRONSON WAY N E RENTC',N WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620-0210-08 947620-0210-08 WILLIAMS BRUCE D 649999 WILLIAMS BRUCE 0 649999 451 BRONSON WAY NE 451 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0215-03 947620-0215-03 LAUGHNAN MICHAEL 0879 LAUGHNAN MICHAEL 0879 455 BRONSON WAY NE 455 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620-0220-06 947620-0220-06 HORAN SHELLI L 179999 HORAN SHELLI L 179999 459 BRONSON WAY NE 459 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0340-01 947620-0340-01 PHILLIPS YTTE 531297 PHILLIPS YTTE 531297 456 BRONSON WAY 456 BRONSON WAY RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620—C345-06 947620-0345-06 CAMPBELL CHARLES L 619999 CAMPBELL CHARLES L 619999 432 B10NS0N WAY NE 432 BRONSON WAY NE RENTOIN WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0350-08 947620-0350-08 VAZQUEZ GUILLERMO A+ROSALIN679999 VAZQUEZ GUILLERMO A+ROSALIN679999 411 WINDSOR WAY NE 411 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0345-06 947620-0345-06 CAMPBELL CHARLES L 9999 CAMPBELL CHAR 3 L 619999 •432 BRONSON WAY NE 432 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON HA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-03`_ 0-08 947620-0350-08 VAZQUEZ GUILLERMO A+ROSALIN679999 VAZQUEZ GUILLERMO A+ROSALIN679999 411 WINDSOR WAY NE 411 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON t' A 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-03t5-03 947620-0355-03 CHU WOODY CHI 774472 CHU WOODY CHI 774472 7809 RANCHO MIRAGE DR 7809 RANCHO MIRAGE OR LAS VEGAS NV 89113 LAS VEGAS NV 89113 947620-03E0-06 947620-0360-06 DOBSON .,OHN W 302141 DOBSON JOHN W 302141 6611 114TH AVE SE 6611 114TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 BELLEVUE WA 98006 947620-0440-00 947620-0440-00 HASH NORMAN 1276 HASH NORMAN 1276 358 BRONSON WAY NE 358 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620-0445-05 947620-0445-05 HOFF CLARA 100783 HOFF CLARA 100783 360 BRANSON WAY NE 360 BRANSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0450-07 947620-0450-07 JAEGER ROBERT F 401788 JAEGER ROBERT F 401788 2304 NE 10TH PL 2304 NE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 )47620-0455-02 947620-0455-02 LARKIN JACQUELINE J R1078 LARKIN JACQUELINE J R1078 408 WINDSOR WAY NE 408 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 )47620-0460-05 947620-0460-05 LEWIS BRADLEY J+JACQUELINE 499999 LEWIS BRADLEY J+JACQUELINE 499999 408 WINDSOR WAY NE 40E WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 147620-0473-03 947620-0470-03 DOLLEMAN MICHAEL 901931 DOLLEMAN MICHAEL 901931 422 WINDSOR WAY 422 WINDSOR WAY RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 47620-0471-02 947620-0471-02 BRAUD S B 0477 ; .1 BRAUD S B 0477 424 WINDSOR WAY NE �` 424 WINDSOR WAY NE 9476i0-0360-06 94 /620-0360-U DOBSON JOHN W 302141 DOBSON JOHN 302141 6611 114TH AVE SE 6611 114TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 BELLEVUE WA 98006 947620-0440-00 947620-0440-00 HASH NORMAN 1276 HASH NORMAN 1276 358 BRONSON WAY NE 358 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620-0445-05 947620-0445-05 HOFF CLARA 100783 HOFF CLARA 100783 360 BRANSON WAY NE 360 BRANSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0450-07 947620-0450-07 JAEGER ROBERT F 401788 JAEGER ROBERT F 401788 2304 NE 10TH PL 2304 NE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 • 947620-0455-02 947620-0455-02 LARKIN JACQUELINE J R1078 LARKIN JACQUELINE J R1078 408 WINDSOR WAY NE 408 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947620-0460-05 947620-0460-05 LEWIS BRADLEY J+JACQUELINE 499999 LEWIS BRADLEY J+JACQUELINE 499999 408 WINDSOR WAY NE 408 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0470-03 947620-0470-03 DOLLEMAN MICHAEL .901931 DOLLEMAN MICHAEL 901931 422 WINDSOR WAY 422 WINDSOR WAY RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947620-0471-02 947620-0471-02 BRAUD S B 0477 BRAUD S B 0477 424 WINDSOR WAY NE 424 WINDSOR WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947670-0050-00 947670-0050-00 AVERY STUART D+SHANNON J 579999 AVERY STUART O+SHANNON J 579999 401 GRANDEY WAY NE 401 GRANDEY WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 947670-0060-08 947670-0060-08 CkESTANELLO JAMES J CRESTANELLO JAMES J 404 GRANDEY WAY NE 404 GRANDEY WAY NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 947670-0065-03 947670-0065-03 BADER CHRISTOPHER C+TERESA 769999 BADER CHRISTOPHER C+TERESA 769999 402 GRANDEY WAY NE 402 GRANDEY WAY NE RFNTnN WA onncA RFNTnN LJA onncs. I' ,li t r..b :.::.::.::..v..{....�.............. . }.....5........£......v.i.IX.•..... .::: : •:: i . '1 .. r. .v:..v{.::.:}v:1n: .::} v:w.:v:wn•::. w.... :::.1..:.v "..:•ti.: .:::.:. i. l :� .iJY. .¢ v� � } lxi : ii:iN :t.i{ ^ { .Y .� : J.Y1F,: �• K/.. .:FW ±r4. W N ::v . .x . ... \ . �..n ...::M1: x: . �.::::2 :: : :: . o �•.. $: :fj v .piyy ... . ....} }. . n . y. v: .: .( y : � . ni: i : : :� :: i:.;:G;:L::.;:v::n A:: . . . <:<;..:::.:::.:::.:.::::>.�:: .:: ::. .. uISLQN................:...............................................,........:._>,......__...... ....:.::.....:...r,.... . . . ......:..... ...:... ..::::...........:....:::}..§.:.::vvnv.:::,v,.•,w:::i.}.vow:. :.vi•.w............,.....:.::tw::�:<•:::U:v. :Xii::ti:iF9:::: . / . .... ....:.. .; .. .....: v.:.Y.:{. ? ::.:::. :::::}.::::::::J:::.:::55..�:.�::m:::::..::::x:::.�n!^:::::::i-::.�:-::i:y•:::T:x:•..�... 111 ....:...................n.:............... ........ .. ..::::r.C;iiii'•ii:i:':::::ni::.. ::....:..:.:.. .....t•}.�••:::..n•% ':�v:'::tti...♦..........:.................... 6:•iiiryii:}.:i.i::J.•.rr..ii'.i':ii•ii"..;v....•;....:%..::,v,.x:. ?•iii:'4:•iii'::i:iiii.'�i:•:ii::•i+i}iiY iiii.. f•i%•iiii':•"'':•iy:�. ::::::::::::::: ASTER �PP! ICI+U1� � :.: . . . � '� ::.::...... .::.;.:.:.:..... . .. PROPERTY OWNERS) . . PRaJECT INF.„.PRMAT10N ; Note )f there to rinore:than.one eae(owner,please attach an additional natanzed<M1lfastcr.Applicet(on f44)acft>61Wn _ ... . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: /`O /Vif/S/1r /Y/ /Z/ 44e 4G' A+j L/ NAV LI-AP - A► / ,/o PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: le/2 ///rom 4y�A. . 4/2 �',1F f 1.114y Af.0. Aevsl W, AlAsif/ A! q8o CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): fleN7PN 7b c f4F-62o-o-46� TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): lm :::.::...:::::. . . 425- 27.?- : -. • 10/ Re4, in�yl wr 4'/ v <'i:R APPLLCANT (if.ether then owner) .........:::>>:<>«; PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: N COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: C Q, R-8 �PZ ) �,• ijy°��/vTA TELEPHONE NUMBER: '9j�G ��/1 -\"1,• PROPOSED ZONING/(if applicable): � Qv teaheilc •'•V >£ �l CONTACT PERSONI .::: . . /� ......... ... fi{3 .t SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): /1 NAME: • �,I o ;� . !4' '+ Grv,3l� c ur f,' T COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: reAlPidar ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? !!¢'Fe ale/��r/u( )', hJI e-96, No CITY: ZIP: Q Qe�� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY 25 A 7 SENSITIVE AREA? /wD TFI FPHONF NUMBER: 4�•1.2 '14A /J ://� 4 LEGAL._> ESCfi1PT1.P Q PROPERTY:A�##ach�: . »<; ,:,:,: ;i.i r -, • .:...::...:::::: :...:.: { :.... .: ...aeP�ra�e;�heet r:f::necessar:Y). ...... .......:.. 0A 4, AlW /2 I /m'l 2 �f ;.... .0/?-eGPT-i4iver..-4, /r� d/elr.yr 38 , 72 p2 �e �ci�/ 4 , coziv7 or ' -, ,-1 - en/. • F . : : . : :::::::::: :: :::::::::::::::::iimil:::.:::: T. : . ; :::: ::::.:: mio ....... .... YPE.Cl�APP�ICATI >.; _N Check all application:type that.aPP Y.;t CI tY sXaff.w>II)de#ertt.* fees —ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ —SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ —" (NO. CU. YDS: 1 • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE 4.31� $ iG _-� . (FROM SECTION(.'`) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL —WETLAND PERMIT $ — —ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: — SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ — VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW _ REVISION $ — $ ArtiDAVIT O 01N VER > l'ito9dtq 'r94 Ni,::§ ( I, (Print Name) • s declare that I am (please check one)_the owneOf t . rope invo.-%I in its application, the authorized repr sentative to act for fhe property owner(please attach proof of euthorizatiorS a t at T contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to th es of m '' ge o a tell ants and answers herein yJs�dge an beN3f. — — ••401 ,� 'UBL%� J `,/J ATTEST: SubscrIP 4 n �O�� 6 � >� -- a Notary Public, in and for the State of t, .i�,, 1N ",y1 (Name of Owner Representative) se�><. 19k_d' iti• iitt 11111 `t day of (Signa re of Owher/Represen ative) Af/ (Signature of Notarylip‘" . l is; .::::::::::.::.:::.:: .:..: ;.:.:�;...;::::::.:::;:;:<.. .::::::. .,;. .; . : :::::::.::.......... .. .... .let >:::::::> ::.:. :..Gft Fite Dumber. �� > .:..<.;.. : >::.>;:;:..::;:<;...:;... :::: �� ;;: A....AADgSf' CAP- .: ..::::.:: .MHP:1:.:PP JD FP PP R...RUMP S .A..;SAH:;: SHRL- QTAL FEES,::•:$.:::; � . O.STAG .. . -: , MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ,<:> CITY OF RENTON >:::::::<:::<:::: >;:.;;:::i.. DIVISION :: ::. :°`.::;>.:.:< '< ::::< :;. :; :: 1 .......::•> :::.>::>::>:>:>:: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES V:«..G:i:'i�:<:::;:'rti >. : ::r.` » > ..... ->� �>:<:>::::'<:i[:::::::::�::`::::i:i:ii:.;r: ;ii:;:;�:; . • ::•:: :: :.: .. : .:..:.: : .:.:...:. ERMIT :: : : : .:::.::::::::::.: : .. LAND USE P CATION 1'VIASTER APPL __ PROPERTY. OWNERS) PROJECT 1 :;FORMATION:> `><€<<' " `: << I!ote3 If thereismora than one legal owner ptease attach an additional ficti6ri#Ibd NFbst t`.AppiiCib:titir'far..each'owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: /hi `'�f' %�&J // liaiii h/+ �AA/q PR �P9Oht CTY/PROJECT AD 'P'N—TION: ADDRESS: ,,/ 412 R/N054/ 2 A/ ' ' 4 • • i3O Nii�//>.� N*y N`•P• ! t xi,i / Neta,/, ''! ' 7 0 ep CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): f ; l 7I 06 9 q¢ '24-64& TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): itAP---- 'ir?""Pc). 1 : p.:.::.::.:.:.:::.::::.:., / i ge-.*., *A14rit"fAfrfl I,1'12e. P4k,ez ' APFLtlai# thef l €artQwnef} PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: f iVq- COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: . f'g.61 S/De1vrj-‘ ) TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON fix/Vi�6T SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: MI Nor le - . h¢ A'Gs 64R3 p011") COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: 'Y" r pmr Ar /may fr / ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? J9 thp/lC mr. 5ii-,i" o Ai.0 CITY: ZIP: l&a IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY 0 yil� SENSITTI/VI,E AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: /li(/ 47-.19g.;...`941/W4°[ _. LEGAL DESI.....?TION OF PROPERTY (Attach scpwate sheet if necessary) !o7G47 C't 4, llii'P '/2. 1I s AvaO6s✓ To ~Tevi, A?20,4404VGr 7o * /PIAT t q- feP c Vo d/if/4 38 ITS, /�/Ayt ) 72 O 2-3, 'Ce/ 7 et /,,fq CeriiAq,, ,(1741/. 'r1uA�e Al Ne ef, f ,, tires % - , -i ep d -0 .... ............................................................................. ..„................ TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ ANNEXAT ON $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. P N AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIALPERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ V_ VARIANCE (FROM SECTION(! •444t4 $) _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER (0*.i 3)$ _ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ . _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP' I, (Print Name) , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, _the authorized representative to act for the property owner qj a attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted\��>f�)r��if 6q ,true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • `�• •o Sg10N ... l' '' V 'aA:, t ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public, in and ��--lA�� NpTAey _for the State of tAllil,4Nyl�v, residing at l2xn701 Na?---1me of Owner/Representative) _ —6— = on the "day of • PUB Ots ...F.: C C+. 19`{�. r . ti (Signature o Ow r presentative11 J'''••..�,Z••'•Cs,.` j*re/ *�'F wAS ` N (Signature of No ry Public) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: A AAD BSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H ECF LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R RVMP SA-A SA-H _SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME TP V-A V-B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 January 4, 1999 �.'a Lesley Nishihira,Planning Technician 0/411. Development Services OA. Municipal Building—6`h Floor t/xitii, 6 1055 South Grady Way IF 0 'IL. Renton,Washington 98055 b� `9`99 Re: Wong/Li Estate Remodel&Addition �,r‘ 412 Windsor Way N.E. Renton,Washington 98056 Dear Ms.Nishihira: Enclosed please find a complete submittal requirement,Justification for the Variance Request,for the above referenced location. The property is located at Windsor Way North East in Renton. The area of the site is approximately.14 acres or 6,313 square feets. The current use of the site is classified as Residential R-8,single family residence. The purpose of this submittal is to request setback variance along the front property line,which is facing Windsor Way Street, it is the only accessible side into this property from public street. The back(opposite)property line which is facing N.E.4th Avenue is not accessible into the property because slope is very steep there. A proposed project of two cars garage plus second story is designed to meet our need for expansion with all the considerations of the provisions of zoning ordinances and regulations. Unfortunately,the limitation due to the topography,location of the existing utility,public bus stop,and existing lot line configuration along Windsor Way Street unable us to build within the required 20'-0"setback. The lot coverage calculated at 28.3%(1,789 total square feet of building). The proposed front yard setback at the corner of the primary structure,which is closest from property line, is approximately 14'0'. Potential hazard condition in front of the new garage,which commented per pre-application has been addressed. Center of such garage is relocated to allow clearance of approximately 15'-6"to the property line,and the rockery wall at front angled to allow direct sightline for pedestrian. Please see attached plans for details. Should you require any additional information regarding this matter,please contact(425)602-4939. Thank you. Sincerely, Ken Wong Li Wan Li-Wong Property Owner Property Owner Enclosures: City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum dated 11/12/1998,2 pages Condition of Justification (10)Copies Master Application (2)Sets self-adhesive mailing labels for all property owners within 300 feet (2)Copies of signed and notarized current property ownership information. (11)Copies of neighborhood detail map/(1)copy 4"X6"P.M.T.reduction:Neighborhood Detail Map (10)Copies architecture drawings:Site Plan (12)Copies architecture drawings:Architectural Elevations (5)Copies architecture drawings:Floor Plan (1)Copy 8-1/2"X11"P.M.T.reduction:architecture drawings Development Services Division Waiver of Submittal Requirements for Land Use Applications 01/06/99 WED 18:15 FAX 2 MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP 4 001 Post-4r Fax Note / .��766711�L Data 0 a/ p/eo5 January 7, 1999 To /Y/� huff/-/T From , ��y6�s er- 'Co./Dept. Co. f /..•. ♦.. • Lesley Nishihira, Planning Technician Phone% , r . P'7Ofe g�11 ' Development Services Fax 8��; �,A5p0 Fax n A / Municipal Building—6th Floor 5 I�� 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Wong/Li Estate Remodel& Addition 412 Windsor Way N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Dear Ms. Nishihira: Attached please review information for the above referenced project File No. LUA99-001. Per your request, total building area calculated as the following: Proposed basement (garages) 477 sq. ft. Existing first floor 1,297 sq. ft. Proposed first floor 392 sq. ft. Proposed second floor 1,808 sq. ft. Total building 3,974 sq. ft. Please do not hesitate to contact myself at(425) 602-4939 regarding this manner. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Ken Wong Property Owner 7LOPMENT PL'. CITY OF RENTON JAN 0 i 1999 RECEIVED Following are outlined conditions of justification for the variance request a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special Circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or Surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the Building& Zoning Code is Found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification. 1. Steep slope along N.E. 4th Avenue unable to build and access from public street. See photo attached. 2. Irregular configuration of the front property line. See plans attached. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or Injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. 1. Existing bus stop can remain at its existing location. Proposed garage location will prevent potential hazard condition to bus operation and their passengers. See photo attached. 2. Existing light/utility pole can remain at its existing location. Relocating existing light/utility pole to neighbor property to allow construction access is avoided for potential lawsuit, inconvenience, and expenses to neighbor property. See photo attached. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the Limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. 1. Site constraints of access to site, property line configuration, and existing public Improvements bring about a unique situation for this project site. d. That the approval, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Boad of Adjustment is a Minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Other alternative options considerated and found difficulties to accomplish are the following: 1. City to grant permission for traffic access to site from N.E. 4`h Avenue to allow Expansion builds at rear property. 2. Neighbor's permission to allow existing light/utility pole and bus stop locate to Their property, so that expansion for garage and building along Windsor Way is possible. Z.Z CIo.Q��T per,41 .. 41fV0 11999 \\• D oi ..max ( •.�t N,,Y4 rt, ; "Y 1 '4 Y'` i xT •_•:10: I,: .o.•eb2.r"Z�ii: p•1 4241; 1: `s 15:1 `;.r t/;e ;Q; �, OFpR q�toH-•` U 'q T T E 2 E b :; ..•, 1. Iii \•-• ecQs 6aor .:;�. aoa• . r•ail .1.:as\ is. r 60 c • .\\\.\_ \ L'. .."' La— OR ' 1_ - C:- ' 71„ EO i. ...y.; ,F� - v>c_: . '� 15�i�(j /-.1 59 1 I46, A� : • sh` BRONSON .;MP I. • �q "^' �• Sri ' ,; v,,,C 1..v." 0...-J 0 ,rrl-poi z., .1.* -.../ ' * 7, so i 55 t. r rer it:n. n° :soil) s it i \ 4 /../r ., [,; l7Q. ojr' ZQ 5i l e L'�' '7):jas '°S -.'', 3•~ fe r w 6ti ep ` 9b90 O O 30 , .1 v r�(), -• • , Y� 2i ss- - .29 y ., w •S 6� 3} ` ./ / rr aye • (� •`' 'r - •,6• •� , \4.1 f,\` \z" \o / ,^ r�yJ . 5 l ' �y p� �7, �. 2 �' 4. J6 f7 $ - ,. � s P . .� zae. S 294Q'...‘ • 4Z, 60 �y•E 2r. 23 c r. t ..... ...:, 6 8 0.0 ,,,,•• A 1,4 s? '. \1'-.%1 I .11:>/ .',....p a- ,, ‘c° '�' j 1 Co aI 1'S' b1 I4 S> P -ss c . 22 T3 ICJ.„ RJ ! 1io 9 S . 9S O r . y "';,`. 18 -s r4 4.O . . I , • 13' I1A '� 0 14. bo 6a J� �,� , .:• • 1. • 16'* ofil, r RRr Q r , aA` ,,oz• IV.$, -5 * 4 , _ --,J f ;: .,' • - . N.r'''. ss . . i - _ 17 HPLA7TZD T.L? :., : / Ice/O [c 6 L ,�S�s '``•} A' vl ' /F'/�°N�t o 6v z5192zo 1 _ ___ Vu ti 1�' 067Ac. 3 H5 , 6 ./, iiiicel 4VPPtir 1 , \ !Sr ,"' . s.r� ' Ji �. Tr re O . �'1 ' 51 So .../hi _ �i ,R;H G ,�J r, o Q 33..`', Hi Z • 67 0 •.,- CD I] • Tr/S7{; .O/ ffl> \••b. y etx 4- ,.. .. _._ ,-, ‹..,.. t.t.' • 275 bob -3 3 j Ov- v ( - �- Q 4.c O :off, 9,, �Q 99 % s / v aCk . q, rr, oo /' o ro /`a. ti I CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: November 12, 1998 `Op •"O: Pre-Application File No. 98-86 CityFR jp 1,+; . I=ROM: Lesley Nishihira, Assistant Planner, x7270 r�yy >UBJECT: Wong/Li Variance Ne have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced ievelopment proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on he pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned hat information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by )fficial decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board )f Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site )tanning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is ;ncouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. I. General: The subject property is located at 412 Windsor Way NE. The proposal is to expand an existing single family residence. The proposed structure will extend into the required 20 foot front yard setback to approximately 5 feet on the ground floor and approximately 15 feet on the second floor. An administrative variance is required. 2. Zoning/Development Standards: The subject site is zoned Residential at 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). The R-8 zone allows a maximum lot coverage by buildings of 35%. Building height is restricted to 30 feet or 2 stories for primary structures. the R-8 zone requires a 20 foot setback from property lines in the front and rear yards and a 5 foot setback for sideyards. The setbacks are measured from the property lines to the nearest point of the structure. 3. Administrative Setback Variance: The proposal requires an administrative setback variance in 3rder to reduce the required 20 foot setback to 5 feet for the first story and to 15 feet for the second story. The burden would be on the applicant to show that: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileged enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical' zone classification. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. PRE9886.DOC\ c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent wit the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. d. That the approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. It is likely that staff would be unable to support the requested variance. The reduction of the first floor setback to 5 feet would create a hazard to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic especially due to the location of the existing rockery. The backout distance for vehicles parking in the garage needs to be at least fifteen feet. If the plans were redrawn to show the garage with tandem parking and the first floor with the same setback as the second floor setback (approximately 15 feet), the variance would be more likely to receive approval. Because the initial proposal would create an adverse situation and because there are options to the proposal that would reduce potential hazards, staff would recommend denial of the requested variance if made as a formal application. 4. Application Requirements: Once a complete application is received, an administrative variance will take approximately 4 to 6 weeks to process. Attached is a list of the submittal requirements for the application. cc: Jana Huerter PRE9886.DOC\ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS - LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS REQUIREMENTS• BY: BY Calculations, Survey, _ Drainage Control Plan.z Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3 nrig4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plarn Map, if applicable 4 (� Floor Plans 3ANo4 a Geotechnical ReportzA1'IO3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailedz King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual a Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions4 • Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one'per monument) , • Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography.Map (5';contours)3 Traffic Stury 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 o Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 J123 Wetlands Delineation'Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 GnYVtV �� Wetlands Study 4 0/( v This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: INONkn/IA 1/R'P4ki'-\ (t 2. Public Works Plan Review Section (13/4 3. Building Section DATE: (J� 'e 4. Development Planning Section **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 01/04/99 13 : 07 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9900013 Amount : 107. 04 01/04/99 13 : 06 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 1713-WONG Init : CRP Project # : LUA99-001 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 947620-0465 Site Address : 412 WINDSOR WY NE Total Fees : 107 . 04 This Payment 107 . 04 Total ALL Pmts : 107 . 04 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 100 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 7 . 04 e / / .--3-Avx iil ir+ 'II • / S .6 O' , --- 03• ,�� , i u LTA = 65'34 50 �t�� " �� R = 409.30 IIPIi • o ' c� T = 263.67 dui . L = 468.43' \cK. .,9�,9 �� / - .1IJ it, •, \� CHM SC RE AT g - _ -' -Y• • . �, 1' --- 1 ... 2. ,. \, q' I' ,,i, \� 4- , .. / EASIER:,P.C.MX CORNER 1 R 715EN w.r.99'R �� \ 192.9e ' .0•'' .7" .. -L A P C a M.E9CE Nou9E NIl iii -;« i 1 / ITRA.•\,......rpoilsw- .74., EIEV..190.91 .' .1.5:•. •...,9G9 ' --- —nowt/ �•" _ -:�:• _rake ►.... . � low #422 /// Ott / I i / A • '�� • 991.ti.109 �� 1 • E 1\ 7K IF191.9 ' IV° ,,� a .1..7 ' i i T PC •Olt. _. � /0 ,,, 412 WINDSOR 4"X4" CONC MON FND BY HAYDC =_�a N82i►6',i»� '¢ 'p a / SRN pL19L2t— PROPERTY BOUNDARY AF#820316901 • ► A A•' ' ass '• �; FND 3 Cu PLUG d ;% : A :. OF PLAT P.I. W I. ONE M.LC. `� 36 ' MON TS 'S Ole' & , • 215.30' ©..1a, .,,,A\ #410' . �1 C1a�„- c�o7�`'� 11l 1n 1 r 1-- �. • //�, N. y • "4\� .11,?. R. f ..allimili � Lit i�`` �,� o o ' � � up _ / '''' 4 la,ru"1,-.I1.1 7 .. ,. �t oo •w e\,+ DELTA = 73°33 00" \• a L = 402.89' •z >� • \ .. �_ � SEC COR CB / •POINT EN R.P'S VIIII:* 4" I.P. FND BY HAYDON IS S & '' 10 AF#8203169019 IS N 0.15' M PLAT ; 1�� & W 0.15' OF PLAT P.I. 1/16 C R. . I 1i r I ; /Pi I • Ii .. -- WONG/LI ESTATE I , o I— 3 412 WINDSOR WAY N.E. I I • : / LEGEND RENTON,WA 98056 I R I — STRUCTURE FRONTINS I I V�/J EXIST: c we� sn9 I ' PROPOSED STRUCTURE - OUSTING+ADDITION it %/A" I.P. FND BY HAYDON 8203169019 IS N 0.27' tioxi THIS PLAN IS PRODUCED BY MINS CITY OF RENTON .®® ��,,,� I E 0.0 8' O F PLAT P.I. suzvE.MAP PACE.JOB+.1451s oO DATED o,-so-I�w #$ o I iSCALE 1"=50'-0" Im I IL-7- 1. I DATE NEIGHBORHOOD P LAN EXHIBITA RENTON,WASHINGTON - • • i i 1 I 1 I 1 71 ; 1 � 1 I y'1I gt�1 I ! 1 I nl I bb� ibf1 i 2bbf I �I I „i 11 i ii tit ii $Ij 1 I 1 • 20'-0'SET eArx 1 — 7b'C•SET d1cK I - 1 70'q•5E7 a�c+c I I t I I I ! 1 ` 1 I }.xx xx I 1II1Ili // 11 1 r I I -�� mom=-s _-�mS=srr' I Ii... ::;: ' '`i - 1 I I I I 1 IB'I ROOF ;::i_ n r�_g; I [:€ i I it 1 I - _al- �Ois';��_._ I NM ROOF DINIVEMY 11.k--t'. "-L-,-=‘'' ---- 1 1 ! 1 NM ROOF ! 1 I 1 Y 1 I I L-I I I ! r \ a y., itlli:t --� I i ROOF i. .�. - �E L_J I b D05T1N6 1 ; 1 - tr_: 14 r1 i i ' r I j 1ov I .Ir Ir I MN u I / 1 I I I ' ^ I I I I I I� , rwSTme I r ° " I I I I B ° ' if' I I I'Th ll I /' r ? i _ I orri ti' I I II 'I i GlyKRpp1 — i i i ____ I I i I II -1 IB'1 --- I I i I I lar I FAMILY Wag) 1431 I I I il - _ SFAGE • I J I I �� Thl 1 Nyl RDOF 1,_ • I ® I ® I IdIROOF I i I ABOVE \ 4'o•� 1 I _�?'e• I > 1' �_tat `` _ ,�+t I ABOVE 1 I 1 Val 11200 STAIR l I -� ERNE SrAIR 1_ LIL..""\I � IIB1 I I I 1111 LAN79U:PE I 1 I I j I ewemis _ I I 510FiMLK WONG/LI ESTATE SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN 412 WINDSOR WAY N.E. RENTON,WA 98056 LEGEND TOW ATOKY RETAINM6 WALL ,, TO MATON EXISTING \v' NORTH SCALE 1'=20.-0" NEW WALL DATE: CONCEPT PLANS -. EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXHIBIT B RENTON,WASHINGTON