Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-026 CY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA L AI#: 8.-F . Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: December 14,1998 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson-Davis x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... Acceptance of the dedication of additional right-of-way for a 42 foot Correspondence.. section of South 34th Street to comply with City of Renton code for Ordinance new short plats. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Exhibit Map Information • Special Power of Attorney Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: The purpose of this dedication is to comply with City of Renton Code for new short plats. The area to be dedicated is a 42 foot section of South 34th Street. The dedication is a code requirement of the Stiegman Short Plat, LUA-98-026, and needs to be completed prior to the recording of the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. AGNBILL.DOT/ . Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 93055-2189 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 2 9230 S-9 Otto Project File k: Street Intersection:5 3y ST. 0 Wells Ave. S. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Wa I+et-4Ilse St i e}ma nTcust 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) Sw %y , Sec. 29, T23N, RSE, W.M. The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Wethiet., , Tie gy ►+ .44.i Mayor ar."-..., 97-‘47&-- Jay �/ City Clerk INDIl'7DUAL FORM oA�� ."`�S AT OF WASHINGTON j SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING `�...o.‘‘`` I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that tvWC..om S S. Nota�"S t111 �lillin box ;of PVV'' t� 1-ks.riAs,?..% W$ocneyy %e1 ,c't signed this instrument and . � am.". "'b r '' acknowledged it to be his/her/tit it free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ' t 4,� i/e mentioned in the instrument. \42.1kec S4!t ev-rmn 2-fle3 i Ilse S-C%erman i s ••- • • �n _e. ,] j I, i 1.0�1riA. `/� eaa am I✓\ mot ijl�''4,1 4. �,ri NotaryPublic in and for the fate of Washington ''a,��•••••r Notary(Print) 1vLotr�, tvlotl E.'%\een Adam° �'i�►4w My appointment expires: pA .‘4:362, 1 t• ,%%%••%`• Dated: 12.•3.gts_ -05 ripsvc5 I Project: Exhibit APED wo# Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet, of the South half, of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, of the Willamette Meridian; Except the,East 660 feet thereof,and described as follows: . Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel, being also the Northwest corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- 80,records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'36"W 205.77 feet, along the East line of said parcel,being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection with the center line of South 34th Street, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street,to its' intersection with the center line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of Wells Ave. South; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, the central point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along the South line of proposed street dedication,to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel,to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.17 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52"to the West margin of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. c 1 glpil O j / WIRES 1211/l 9 tit it-2-96 EXHIBIT MAP 1MNSPER II S01'48'36"W 205.77' I 253 25' 1 3 1 2 No 4 In N WELLS AVE. Sto . — % S01.50'32"W N NN 25.25' in IY\¢6 0'- -46.08'.1 N 5 I A=66'33'52 � R=25.00' ';�o A=93'26'08" L=37.77' a R=25.00' I 6 I 7 L-40.77. JL 21' 21' .<FL 1 NORTH I N PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION �- 0 i, ccN w v TRACT 'A' z w I-- N N d ;o- m Z � S. L T�ti p o/ x4 c 78 k • t11 i .4, 169300 �18TS 21'121' rN Q1'AL L A 4 EXPIRES: 12-1-1999 12-2-9�8+' 'I 42 08' U' NO1'53'41"E Mn/ Ham 5 Jfa rr- s rtar tale, G1Akapiekort ��irci doePk , 5c ;te 31/0 . `87D"/ SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, WALTER STIEGMAN and ILSE STIEGMAN, husband and wife, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint, MALCOLM S. HARRIS as our true and lawful attorney, for us and in our name, place and stead, to take any and all actions and execute any and all documents with respect to the following described real estate owned by us, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: The North 330 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington. (hereinafter "the Property"). Said attorney-in-fact shall have full right and authority to sell the property,to grant,warrant, bargain and deliver deeds, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other documents of conveyance or encumbrance; to retain services necessary for the repair,protection, development or improvement of the property;to initiate, defend and settle any claims arising with respect to the property; and to take any other action which we might take with respect to the Property if we were personally present, all on such terms, as to him shall seem satisfactory, and for us and in our name, and as our act and deed; and to make, sign, seal, execute, deliver and acknowledge good and sufficient deeds and conveyances for the same, either with or without covenants and warranties. GIVING AND GRANTING unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, including, without limitation, the creation of escrows and the execution and delivery of escrow instructions,as fully to all intents and purposes as we might or could do if personally present; We, Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman,hereby ratifying and confirming all that our said attorney, Malcolm S. Harris, shall lawfully do or cause to be done, by virtue of these presents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 2 4 day of October, 1997. Larittk. .4 -4 Walter Stiegman, Grant' Ilse Stiegman, G ante Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: Witness Witness C� Residing at Sat.c , WA Residing at c✓/4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this --4 day of October, 1997. s ;.•• .3 +. (Print Name) .•Q�'(ER 8�c �� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of •. . ... ..SloH A;,.• •1: Washington, residing at .,2-9.1 'Let -� �� o° NOTARY 9N�; My appointment expires 473 3/ ( °t/c �. PUBUC 1.z. -O CH • SN\7 - 2 - 410 CIT OF RENTON • ..u. f Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator CITY CLERK(2) • • CITY OF RENTON November 9, 1998 NOV 1 0 1998 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE SUBJECT: NEW ADDRESSES IN NEW PLATS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please note the following new addresses assigned to recently approved plats in the City of Renton. You should add these addresses to your database. Attached new plats: Valley Vue Estates Plat FP- 13� • Whispering Pines Plat PP - '11 - 135 Stafford Crest Plat PP-' 1-' 113 Steigman Short Plat Pierce Short Plat 51AP _ — 14, Sincerely, ayLetI2 Jan Conklin Development Services Representative Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 #1 :utilltr I U;5 South Grady \\ay - Renton. Washington 98055 ,:„,paper c:,rair.2'i re P14 I SE 176 ST , AND PURPOSES SAME MENTIONED. GIVEN UNDER AS HIS OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS FUTURE PERMITS DAY OF 1998 • • THE APPROVAL OF THIS SHOP A • WILL BE GRANTED. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT•EDGEWOOC LINE DATA CURVE DATA 1 NO. BEARING DISTANCE NO. DELTA RADIUS ARC LENGTH ,/ L1 N88'24'24"E 25.04' Cl 93'26'08" 25.00' 40.77' ^o / 1. i L2 N01'48'36-E 25.04' C2 86'33'52" 25.00' 37.77' N 1/4 COR I `- L3 N88'24'24"E 21.03' C3 86'33'52' 25.00' 37.77' CALC POSITION AS PER ^ - PLAT OF W1NSPER DIV. 1 `y CCNC MON W/BRASS.• ------ C4 93'26'08' 25.00' 40.77' DISK AS b FOR • C5 86'30'43" 25.00' 37.75' --PL T F WINSPER DIV 1----- n b EO.3C' 15'_9�✓rv-LINE `� FNC 12�5 r o " Z 4. h . S89'17'33"w 2631 18' 29 w 1/4 COR 1 �;• N89'17.33'� 265810'I POSITION IS RESTORMED / E 1/4 COR FROM PLAT MONUMENTS 0 / CALL POSITION AS PER ' TO NORTH. ESM, INC. S 1/4 COR 5• I.lb, . CTR SEC SET CONC MON SS DISK AS PLAT OF YYNS?ER D. ' DISK AS PER PLAT OF SS CASED CONC MON :-+SE, ItWth 'Pt , FOUND FOR PLCONC MON AT OF WINSPER WINSPER DIV. 1 PLAT OF DISK DIV.V — ---• DIV. 1. E0.30' 15 90' TO LINE h PLAT OF WINSPER 2 •3 N (CITY OF RENTON MON 'fo FND 12-95 NO. 1866) FND 1-1996 • of N _ o WINSPER DIV. 2 �� N o NOTES: > I v I I N �7 11 S THE WETLAND B1;F=EK ;;n _r�1 r .•,, o < 2 3 I 4 I 5 1 6 I 7 1 8 I 9 I 10 9.94. 03?" I wl-•ATSOEvER, AND a FENCF rE I 1 1 1 1 I I NAD W SE COR. NE 1/4, SW 1/4 Lai I J I N88'40'34"E 65�.29' I I I l e3 —— _ CASED MON AS FOUND 1 Lit 96.80' FOR PLAT OF WINSPER ,. Z • 409.41' • m oo t0 - o 33q z. o '�s'tS3,29 DIV. 1 N0.04' & W0.01' sr / cci \ _� _ co co n up "6 0'J FND 12-95 .r 1 / N88'40'34"W `Oo N86'40'34"W --`s.)•s�. \\\ h 13 ' 1�— clop / 50. BUFFER 3 100. 0 N - 0 96'84' 0 4,' c� n o7 o0 00 2 0 30 �7 z o - - - . :-: S ', z) \ 8 _ l o ,� 31 . �33oS� _ ��N 10 W ?5' �� W)tti N88'40'3g"W n N88'40'34"W — LL z o / ^/ 1 � `} _ �� BOFFER \ 0 100.00 a, 0 96.87' n a o i N m m v' I rn 3315� a 33/ 31 z I En z ca>a O csi IN WETLAND 'B' m ..n ui o W o Z / CO n h I N 409.69 N I i 76.Q JO G� N C� 70��' N r7 O<3 S IL1-1;/ n I ) , - I S88'2 ' 4-W 51Y7� / — 588'2a'2a"w - N88'2a'2a'E �� > zo W • I N S . 34 ST. ,21—ss' N 127.53' Z z 2 s �l / ay�1' / Cv Gti 73.a2' 3 I ,`: W D o y Kil TRACT 'A' oul 4 0 < 4 pm TRAC' • NI- 9�.30 ,,,. wE'_AN2, A '' + ^ 96 99. S 1/4 COP. 467 55' \ \ 11- CASED` — — 6 588'40'34"w 656 78' I ASS PE CONC I:•Dh AS PER PLAT =ir .' 32 WINSPER Err-•- cr' 1,NPLATTEC FND 12-9` SEC CDR ~y CASEC CONC 1,13N AS PER `° ' A1..A7 C' WINSPEP 0•. 1 a �-' N86"5;;''E-E 2646 43 • " LEGAL DESCRIPTION T.,r "ORTM 330 =CET. Or THE SO,'''. ".A:F, OF THE 'SOP Tr+trST GUAR'ER, OF - I _ _ CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 1998 TO: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk's Office FROM: Carrie K. Olson-Davis, Plan Review, x7235 /��6 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA 98-026 WELLS AV S & S 34TH ST Attached please find the above-referenced original mylar, and four(4) copies of the mylar for recording with King County. The recording instructions in order are as follows: 1. Record the Deed of Dedication document and write in recording number in space provided at notation "42' STREET DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON AS PER A.F.N. " (located on page 2 of 2). 2. Record the short plat. Please have the Courier take these documents via 4-hour service 10:00 a.m. deadline. A check in the amount of$12.45 is attached. According to Finance,the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account#000/007.5590.0060.49.000014. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Neil Watts(Notice of Recording) Jan Conklin(Please provide PID/recording#'s to Sonja and Carrie) Sandi Seeger(Notice to final short plat on Sierra) Carrie Olson-Davis(Provide any unpaid SDC/SAD fees to Jan for posting to parcels on Sierra) (Provide a copy of receipts of paid SDC/SAD fees to Tom Boyns) Yellow File \TS_SERVER\S YS2\COMMON\C:\W IN W ORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\FORMS\REQRECOR.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator FROM: Carrie K. Olson-Davis,x7235 /6 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA 98-026 Wells Avenue South Technical Services and Development Services have reviewed and recommended approval for the above mentioned short plat. Requirements and conditions have been fulfilled, fees paid. At the Monday, December 14th Council meeting,the Stiegman Deed of Dedication was accepted. It is now in route to be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and will be recorded with the short plat mylar. The attached mylar is submitted for your review and signature. Please return mylar to me for recording. Thank you. cc: Neil Watts Yellow File \\C:\W IN WORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLATIFORMS\REQSIGN.DOC • AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING December 14, 1998 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 1998 4. SWEARING-IN CEREMONY— RENTON MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE Oath of acceptance administered to Terry Lee Jurado, newly appointed Renton Municipal Court Judge, by the Honorable Carmen Otero, retired King County Superior Court Judge 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Council members in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Council member. a. Mayor Tanner recommends that Natalie Dohrn, 3815 Monterey Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, be appointed to the Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring 6/30/2001. Refer to Community Services Committee. b. City Clerk submits 1998 General Election certification; Proposition No. 1, Family Pool Construction Bonds — 7,025 Yes votes and 5,770 No votes (defeated). Information. c. City Clerk/Cable Manager recommends approving the merger of the existing cable television franchise between TCI and AT&T. Refer to Community Services Committee. d. Court Case filed by Russ Eager in United States District Court alleging wrongful and malicious arrest and imprisonment, excessive force, and assault and/or battery in connection with his arrest (for theft and resisting arrest) on 10/19/96. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. e. Court Case filed by Bernadine Spivey and Claudette Thomas alleging bodily injuries and pain and suffering in connection with an automobile/pedestrian accident on 8/11/98. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. f Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a dedication of additional right-of-way for a 42-foot section of S. 34th St. to comply with City Code short plat requirements (Stiegman, SHP-98- 026). Council concur. g. Municipal Court Division recommends renewal of the current probation services contract with Wesley E. Etheridge for 1999 and 2000 at annual costs of$61,200 and $62,400, respectively. Council concur. h. Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division recommends adoption of the 1998 Zoning Map Book and Zoning Wall Map, incorporating specific rezones already approved in 1998. Council concur. (See 10.d. for ordinance.) i. Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division recommends that a public hearing be set on 1/11/99 to take testimony on the proposal to extend the moratorium on adult book stores for an additional six months. Council concur. j. Wastewater Utility Division submits 1998 Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan. Refer to Utilities Committee. 8. CORRESPONDENCE (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 9. OLD BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the chairman if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: Hearing Examiner Appeals; 1999 Budget* b. Committee on Committees: 1999 Council Committee assignments c. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Payroll System Contract 10. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinances for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: a. 1999 Utility Rates for all customer classes (see 9.a.) b. Council compensation (approved via committee report on 12/07/98) c. 1999 Budget (see 9.a.) d. 1998 Zoning Map Book and Wall Map (see 7.h.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. East Renton Plateau annexation (1st reading 12/07/98) b. 1998 Budget Clean-up (1st reading 12/07/98) 11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information) a. Executive Department requests authorization to purchase a 26,442 square-foot parcel from Puget Western, Inc. at a cost of$374,877.52 for the purpose of building a ramp adjacent to City Hall to improve public access. Council concur. 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:30 p.m. Hearing Examiner Appeals • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 28 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 12/14/98 14 : 51 Receipt **w************************************************************* Receipt Number: R9807256 Amount: 11, 424 . 07 12/14/98 14 : 50 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1224 O' CONNER & Init : LN Project # : LUA98-026 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 292305-9040 Location: WELLS AVE S . /SOUTH OF S . 32ND STREET Total Fees : 22 , 305 .43 This Payment 11, 424 . 07 Total ALL Pmts : 22 , 305 .43 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 105 . 000 . 20 . 345 . 85 Park Mitigation Fee 3 , 715 . 32 421 . 388 . 10 . 00 . 0040 Spec Util Connect Stormw 2 , 695 . 00 105 . 000 . 16 . 344 . 85 Traffic Mitigation Fee 5, 013 . 75 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9807245 Amount: 5, 950 . 00 12/14/98 11: 04 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 4601 HULTQUIST Init: CKD Project #: LUA98-026 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 292305-9040 Location: WELLS AVE S . /SOUTH OF S . 32ND STREET Total Fees : 10, 881.36 This Payment 5, 950 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 7, 465 . 36 Balance: 3 , 416 . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 421.388 . 10 . 00 . 0010 Spec Util Connect Water 5 , 950 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9807246 Amount : 3 , 416 . 00 12/14/98 11: 04 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 3000 HULTQUIST Init : CKD Project # : LUA98-026 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 292305-9040 Location: WELLS AVE S . /SOUTH OF S . 32ND STREET Total Fees : 10, 881 . 36 This Payment 3 , 416 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 10, 881 . 36 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 105 . 000 . 09 . 345 . 85 Fire Mitigation-SFR 3 , 416 . 00 _` OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 11, 1998 Mr. Thomas O'Connor 1707 S 341st Place, Suite C Federal Way WA 98003 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026-SHPL Dear Mr. O'Connor: The Deed of Dedication document you submitted for acceptance by the Renton City Council, has been scheduled to be heard at the December 14, 1998 council meeting. Upon approval, this street dedication will be recorded along with the short plat mylar. • The final review dated December 4, 1998 on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. FEES: The fees listed below are based on 7 lots of an 8 lot short plat and are required to be paid prior to recording of the short plat mylars with King County. Fees will be required for Lot 8 at the time of future development. Mitigation Fees:Transportation: 5,013.75 P- Q a" 114` (Ycc z Parks: 3,715.32 / ' \ I Fire 3,416.00 1 n )a -I 4 47s" /fu Subtotal 12,145.07 System Development Charge: Water 5,950.00 1 OJ f t Surfacewater 2,695.00 i 'I O V- ."''\ Subtotal 8,645.00 TOTAL $20,790.07 These fees can be paid at the Customer Services Counter on the 6th floor of Renton City Hall. When these items are completed,you may submit the signed and notarized original short plat mylars along with a check in the amount of$12.45 (current courier fee) made out to CD&L. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at(425)430-7235. Sincerely, akern Carrie K. Olson-Davis Development Services, Plan Review cc: James Jaeger Neil Watts Yellow File C:\WIN WORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMNS.DOC 200 Mill� Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 4�12)This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 7, 1998 TO: Neil Watts, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson-Davis, Plan Review SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026-SHPL Attached is the most recent revision of the above-referenced short plat dated December 4, 1998. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below and return to me as soon as possible. Thanks Also, I noticed the short plat name is not on the drawing.St1'veef. /Ivy , - Al 1 eeut GONS--1 vz.tt d 1c ( II s�iitidavc4 urn v'Clwnvi Nett. s.a.t►, it west Jeep cie mAzi l- l3 Pro, 5"lov i Nani - GDWI Old O'Coi nT1 Phi. NfH ✓< l `� � P d'oto051rP,014 a lord Ta l C /AI ✓e ,tie„t . SeUtUl WaA( Soo s C V se✓Vicr avea , v ; l e ►Hs-tille% M ihr-t,ut tie, (tvlivtspo7C41,ov ) — (Jl 3 . 7 5 Zc) Puoc( pY107 to ve covGt'It: Fire Pq ,t.4 1 -) 1,14 7o also Approval: /ie.ja"), , Date: / z � l 3 Neil Watts C:\WINWORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN7.DOC 31 • .yrVY 0 ''. ♦ .tom •� I rTrifAi QRT Tt RTION FEE' ,. .M:<�J.."r x�wiu,r—..awwcwa•+.w.ri«»xr..r-vw►Y..:r.+s>.it+.wx ..<. .n.snow.Ewx.auw,,,.+,�,�+x<uwe..vw.. r ,. .. . Project Name 51-it- vl • S14o4 Plot Project Address We (I c h4v S el 5 3 L- -th S1 PLAN REVIEW Contact Person Jecrut 7uc c av CITY OF RENTON DECf41998 Address Phone Number 253 - S90 - oq • RECEIVED Permit Number L.Uf4 - RQ-O Z (o Project Description tot S tlovt pia - i-" o({vc l of a li(f Land Use ype: Method of Calculation: Residential CITE Trip Generation Manua! 1 Tt , ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study (Z10) ❑ Non-retail 0 Other pc`y2. Z54 • K4-4. • R.55 i,.4 Iv( Calculation: '7 ,35 rJtt deidcj tries - CR.55) _ 7 " tYI,5 (. ) ($75 ) CC,ae2 Transportation Mitigation Fee: ___437 • ! 50)3. 75 Calculated by: OdweeZ Date: 3/5 t -Re �� 3o�q y At Account Number: •4-OS- LL.Q Date of Payment CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1998 TO: Bob Mac Onic, Technical Services Sonja Fesser, Technical Services FROM: Carrie Olson-Davis, Plan Review SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026-SHPL Attached is the most recent revision of the above-referenced short plat dated December 4, 1998. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below and return to me as soon as possible. Thanks Also, I noticed the short plat name is not on the drawing. — Lior Approval \_c_Jit�l (. , jitcv��.A.�, Date: 12. a 9 t, Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. Sorb Fesl r 1J b �R ovIS.L I S 6LAZ5s.r.c•T l L UJ 3I c,.Q ovia) ("Li "�k-{-I= . 1A'.W )- 1 -To oil AR- -i- -j-,rnff, OF- � . C:\WINWORDTDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN7.DOC PROPE I SERVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SU VISIONS No. 98 APPLICANT: -t 1=l M.ol_1 �/U1=F� J/�1.�11=5 JA �y1�F� RECEIVED FROM (date) JOB ADDRESS: W L L_S As1/1=. S. S 151-4 OF .5Z LAD el". WO# '7854-4 p1ATURE OF WORK: LND# Zo-023 j . PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY LONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,TIlIS REVIEW REPLACES ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 7/2.7/98 0 FRONT FOOTAGE O SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID#2gZ3o5_go40 [ ` NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER V4LL -Y H 1 c A.L_Cl✓Lrj S.&D 84e:6 zu Special Assessment District/WATER Lin LI7 IF Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER T1-I4=1-I P.SJ . 11=490, Joint Use Agreement(METRO) ZOUE.)'Hu 1 IE 51 , .44o 1,L1 Local Improvement District u0 r F'I'`it;) ' • Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE O Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) la, Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x 2, 6 BOO.Ck ) Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 14 Never Pd `5,=,1�1=5 --re Single family residential$585/unit x — 13Y Soce,Q=t1FEtr LOATI Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x SLUE/9 1D151791 f. Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq. ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 181 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x '�G18O, All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ci,eso.oo PLUS t__J 2d t,tnFA) 7/Z7/9f� S� Signatur f Reviving Authority ^L DA E e'T 1.t1C7✓LY t l-.l ao L7, it j i v.e J le/la/Qe u (9- 490 i IFem0 ❑ If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the'finance Dept. for ppa d/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. S ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to O c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: December 14,1998 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson-Davis x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing CC"vCURRENCE Acceptance of the dedication of additional right-of-way for a 42 foot Correspondence section of South 34th Street to comply with City of Renton code for Ordinance U. r. l2—7- 9'r new short plats. Resolution NAME INITIAL/DATE E Old Business , 1 tti_ n I�� tz J Exhibits: New Business ��p,t �(� / Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Z Q- i4• /q (?/7 Exhibit Map Information Special Power of Attorney Z /217 Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: The purpose of this dedication is to comply with City of Renton Code for new short plats. The area to be dedicated is a 42 foot section of South 34th Street. The dedication is a code requirement of the Stiegman Short Plat, LUA-98-026, and needs to be completed prior to the recording of the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. AGNBILL.DOT/ FILE COPY CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: December 14,1998 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson-Davis x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... Acceptance of the dedication of additional right-of-way for a 42 foot Correspondence.. section of South 34th Street to comply with City of Renton code for Ordinance new short plats. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Exhibit Map Information Special Power of Attorney Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept Finance Dept. Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: The purpose of this dedication is to comply with City of Renton Code for new short plats. The area to be dedicated is a 42 foot section of South 34th Street. The dedication is a code requirement of the Stiegman Short Plat, LUA-98-026, and needs to be completed prior to the recording of the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. AGNBILL.DOT/ ) ', . Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2189 • DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 2 9230S-9 0140 Project File#: Street Intersection:5 34 ST. 0 Wells Ave. S. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Wa I4er itIlse St ie�avlTrust 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Xbbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) Sw %y , Sec. 29, TZ3N, RSE, w.M. • The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton gf : Mayor ay r�*�yA,�4.41 City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM d�"��7\/ �`.IS AT OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING `�..v.‘‘‘` I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that t Aa.c.Drn. .5. Not`r �4il�t �1i�llin box ;or 0VV'' I, l"k2.xr:ts,2.S 24.4o cneLAy \et 't signed this instrument and �• � ��� acknowledged it to be his/her/tIeir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes S �ii,� // mentioned in the instrument. �(7.lker S•4 oamax� �-*td I Ise. S-k•tefrvarl i - L.04riA. CA d.�✓rn!S" It/ '04" j Notary Public inor tateoashington Notary(Print) tvLohr2.. Nlot1 E•�\ten Adam° `ttit 4W My appointment expires: pA •1A�02 %•%%%.•%` Dated: 12.3.9a TfSncp,Svcs • Project: Exhibit A WO# PID Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet, of the South half, of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of the Willamette Meridian; Except the East 660 feet thereof, and described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel, being also the Northwest corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- 80, records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'36"W 205.77 feet, along the East line of said parcel, being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection with the center line of South 34th Street, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street,to its' intersection with the center line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of Wells Ave. South; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, the central point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along the South line of proposed street dedication,to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel, to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.17 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52"to the West margin of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet,to the True Point of Beginning. `f,III:rviryiv+.i�i���„"lJcvtt.,w..ti�.v�it1111 Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. i j4. �"1 f .� r it EXPIRES 1?11/99 ryl Ii► It-t-48 EXHIBIT MAP WINSPER II 4,- S01'48'36`W 205.77' _ I I 25' 25' 1 1 2 I 3 Na, 4 -`T, 042. N N WELLS AVE. S. N f So1'50'32_W N 25.25'.—. E,-46.08'. -46.08'.y CV IA=86'33'52 ! /. R=25.00' Im AR=25.00' 93'2608" a 5 6 L=37.77' a = I I 7 L=40.77' _1 L 21' 21' -x.. - -21 ) n ORTH N PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION '..-- 0 N cc . N w tO "' TRACT 'A' vai v w 1- d- N N 8 � 1 � 7 - cn es.. f wA 98�p 1 . ti o g .p8� \ 0; kW 21'121' 40, ?btu, LAB EXPIRES: 12-1-1999 e it wc•••••• Nriiii,,,,z WI'I lii1 I Z-'Z-48 c, k 'kl 42 08' N01'53'41"E k,„pit R i'1 cc r� v /"1nf Nacr%5 Markle /4-1Akety,VR frla5c4 `39 9 ;rcl !1 ae , 5,t;je 3 2/ 5 eu le tJ� . 8 0"/ SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, WALTER STIEGMAN and ILSE STIEGMAN, husband and wife, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint, MALCOLM S. HARRIS as our true and lawful attorney, for us and in our name, place and stead, to take any and all actions and execute any and all documents with respect to the following described real estate owned by us, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: The North 330 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington. (hereinafter "the Property"). Said attorney-in-fact shall have full right and authority to sell the property,to grant,warrant, bargain and deliver deeds, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other documents of conveyance or encumbrance; to retain services necessary for the repair,protection, development or improvement of the property;to initiate, defend and settle any claims arising with respect to the property; and to take any other action which we might take with respect to the Property if we were personally present, all on such terms,as to him shall seem satisfactory, and for us and in our name, and as our act and deed; and to make, sign, seal, execute, deliver and acknowledge good and sufficient deeds and conveyances for the same, either with or without covenants and warranties. GIVING AND GRANTING unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, including,without limitation, the creation of escrows and the execution and delivery of escrow instructions,as fully to all intents and purposes as we might or could do if personally present; We,Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman,hereby ratifying and confirming all that our said attorney, Malcolm S. Harris, shall lawfully do or cause to be done, by virtue of these presents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 24 day of October, 1997. Walter Stiegman, Grant Ilse Stiegman, G antor 4, Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: Witness Witness Residing at Sea , WA Residing at ! (✓/- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this `�day of October, 1997. r :to (Print Name) r-e{^r *IER@ @�,.......,... �•, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of •::'*;058O�4,��., % Washington, residing at )2.9. Q I � o° NOTARY 9N My appointment expires O 3/ ( g/o s PUBUC 7",x,::99CH 19 :• - 2 - O ' CONNOR & ASSOC . , LLC 4 December, 1998 PLAN REVIEW Neil Watts CITY OF RENTON Planning Department DEC 0 4 1998 City of Renton RECEIVED Dear Neil, To reiterate our conversation of 3 December, 1998, it is our desire to delay dedication of ROW to the south from the westernmost end of the 34th St. ROW dedication until we have finalized a location for that road based on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers report. We expect some preliminary comments from them this month on our proposed project. We believe that we have satisfied the intent of The Code by dedicating ROW to the south through the extension of Wells St. to the south property line and to the west by dedicating the ROW to the west property line. Sincerely, e.,9g7„,v) Thomas C. O'Connor 1707 S. 3415T PLACE, SUITE C • FEDERAL WAY, WA • 98003 TAC: (253) 952-3368 • SEA:(253) 815-8856 • FAX: (253) 952-3358 r '• LA ! day National Title Company of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th Street SW #300 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 771-3031 / 527-1432 Fax No. (425) 224-0837 PLAN REVIEW Direct Line (425) 640-3508 / 640/3505 CITY UFRENTOTV ,. Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 DEC 0 3 1998 PLAT CERTIFICATE UPDATED RECEIVED TO: O'CONNER LAW/FW 11707 SOUTH 341SST. # C FEDERAL WAY, W 98003-0003 Attention : TOM Your Number : -- Reference Name: STIEGMAN, WALTER W. OUR NUMBER 0701371 - Plat Certificate Premium $ 350.00 Sales Tax: $ 30.10 CERTIFICATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PLAT Dear Sirs: In the matter of the above described Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and from such examination hereby certifies that: TITLE TO the following described land is vested in: WALTER W. STIEGMAN and ISLE C. STIEGMAN, Co-Trustees of the Stiegman Revocable Inter Vivos Trust created June 9, 1994 THE LAND is situate in said King County, and is described as follows: See Attached - Page 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The North 330 feet of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; EXCEPT the East 660 feet thereof. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn of the SW1/4 S29 T23N R5E SUBJECT TO the exceptions shown herein. No search has been made as to the taxes and assessments. THIS CERTIFICATE shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for. Records examined to NOVEMBER 23, 1998 at 8:00 A.M. Fidelity National Title Company of Washington By: Linda Johnson, S or Title Officer Loraine Livingston, Asst. Title Officer (253) 272-4070 1-888-272-4070 FAX (253) 272-4350 • Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Plat Certificate, Page 3 Our Number 701371 EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Renton. The excise tax rate is 1.78% as of December 26, 1991. 2. GENERAL TAXES AND RELATED CHARGES PAID: Year: 1998 Amount: $1,750.64 Tax Account No. : 292305-9040-08 Levy Code: 2130 Value of Land: $131,000.00 3. The legal description shown in Schedule A was determined from the property address provided at the time of application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. 4. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recording No. : 6120438 Purpose: Community access Affects: 30 foot wide at southwest corner of property The description contained in the above instrument is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. 5. DRAINAGE RELEASE, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: September 14, 1988 Recording No. : 8809140381 6. A RECORD OF SURVEY AND MATTERS RELATING THERETO: Recorded: January 1990 Recording No. : 9001109004 Affects: Said premises 7. ENCROACHMENTS DISCLOSED BY A RECORD OF SURVEY: Recorded: January 1990 Recording No. : 9001109004 As Follows: Fences along all property lines 8. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: November 18, 1996 Recording No. : 9611180695 In Favor Of: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Purpose: Sanitary sewer lines and/or appurtenances Affects: The West 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of the above-described parcel of land; And the North 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of said parcel Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Plat Certificate, Page 4 Our Number 701371 9. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: December 31, 1996 Recording No. : 9612311919 Affects: The West 15.00 feet of the South 121.50 feet; And the North 15.00 feet of the South 121.50 feet thereof 10. ENCROACHMENTS DISCLOSED BY A RECORD OF SURVEY: Recorded: October 22, 1997 Recording No. : 9710229002 As Follows: Concrete retaining wall and fence on North line 11. SEWER EASEMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: October 6, 1998 Recording No. : 9810061369 END OF EXCEPTIONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL 11 )17 a When recorded please return to: Gloria Lung Wakayama Harris, Orr Rd Wakayama 3210 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 j QUIT CLAIM DEED r• THE GRANTORS, WALTER W. STIEGMAN and ILSE C. STIEGMAN, husband and wife, for and in consideration of ten dollars and other good and valuable t c4 consideration in hand, convey and quitclaim to WALTER W. STIEGMAN and ILSE C. cr' STIEGMAN, Co-Trustees of the STIEGMAN REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST created } June 9, 1994, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, \ State of Washington: o }} _ 1 The North 330 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 m of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23 North, r• Range 5 E.W.M., EXCEPT the East 660 feet thereof. r- DATED this 9th day of June, 1994. • _fit'/ l� 1�L� �+_ �• ILSE C. STIEGMAN, Grantorr, WALTER W. STIEGMAN, Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that WALTER W. STIEGMAN and ILSE C. STIEGMAN are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this 9th day of June, 1994. , ,, 0-1 r ]� IPrin Name) 422Ia /MILTS.:.QJILt_ NOTARY PUBLIC in and ar the tate of Washington, residing at . . �My appointment expires . h p qlv oe•t IQ I(b 001 StMCOM A1 NIX 10,0 /4a rADMDOr[fr:0 O'IEO +•trCK Dl A11f1pJ 5r2x DeQtla alrr)-►tt..� 0 as ' • mac Filed for Record at the request of SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT P.O. Box 58039 14616 S.E. 192nd Street Renton,Washington 98058 E(EISETAX r,�i REQUIRED KVGe.FbWrdi Otvision BY Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1032R Project: WINSPER II-ONSITE SEWER Tax Parcel IDS: 292305-9040, 9104, 9124, 9161 &9167 Grantor(s): THOMAS C. O'CONNOR �.y WALTER&ILSE STIEGMAN,by MALCOLM S. HARRIS,Attorney in Fact C'] JACK &ESTELLE J. NEWTON t Grantee(s): SOOS CREEK WATER& SEWER DISTRICT .•t GC SEWER EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this f�7�day of 1' It. , 199?, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that THOMAS C. O'CONNOR, WALTER & ILSE STIEGMAN, by MALCOLM S. HARRIS, Attorney In Fact and JACK & ESTELLE J. NEWTON, owners of land at approximately 3401 Benson Drive S. in Renton, in the County of King, State of Washington, legally described as follows: (Parcel A): The Plat of Winsper II, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Volume /$y of Plats, Pages 79 through 8n , inclusive, records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH (Parcel B): the north 330 feet of the south half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,In King County,Washington; LESS the east 660 feet thereof. PAra A. 1-J our*•! {{r�y, D�CeHrtor New-1L,,. ?Arca8 i S aWi e.! by Sf�'�n(a►..s. P:cordmooccsarysnzoc Pepe 1 of 8 osw,ss t • .__a• . _ • - .4r5'r''-4,.-..:,. 11:11 0 • • • Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1032R In consideration of the sum of One Dollar($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,do hereby grant to SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter "District"), and to its successors and assigns, an easement over, across, under, and through the following described real property: That portion of the above-described parcels of land further described as follows: The front 4.00 feet of Lots 1 through 9 and Lots 39 through 45 of said Plat adjacent to South 35t°Street; TOGETHER WITH the front 4.00 feet of Lots 10 through 13 and Lots 16 through 34 of said Plat adjacent to Main Avenue South; TOGETHER WITH the front 4.00 feet of Lots 14 and 15 of said Plat adjacent to South 34'"Street; TOGETHER WITH the front 7.00 feet of Lots 35 through 38 of said Plat adjacent to South 35th Street/Main Avenue South; TOGETHER WITH the west 4.00 feet of the east 96.99 feet of said Parcel B adjacent to proposed South Wells Street; .-1 All as shown on page 7 of 7 herein. Lei SSaid easement is for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, inspecting, .4 maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using sanitary sewer line(s) and or appurtenances thereto, together with the non-exclusive right of ingress to and egress from said portion of Grantor's property for the foregoing purposes. This easement la granted subject to the following terms,conditions and covenants: 1. THE USE OF PROPERTY BY GRANTORS. The Grantor has title to said real property and is authorized to grant, convey and warrant this easement to the District. The Grantor shall not erect buildings or structures of a permanent nature, or any other Improvements, or trees or large shrubbery which may in any way interfere with the District's Installation or maintenance of the sanitary sewer line(s) and appurtenances. The Grantor may use the surface of the easement for paving, • small scale landscaping,or other uses which do not Interfere with the District's use of the easement. Grantor shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the District In removing structures,trees, or large shrubbery which interferes with the District's use of the easement. 2. RESTORATION. Upon entry into the easement area by the District, the • Grantor's property will be restored to a condition as good as or better than the premises were prior to the entry by the District. Where possible, photographs will be taken prior to construction on said property to assure the completeness of restoration. Final restoration will include, but not be limited to, sod replacement in r:iawo»ocwEvs nnoc Page 2 of 7 01040111 • • .•a'•r' �n�iK}.<•7r W.a,.4... v`..?iw:w rt.MYa�l`a. - •• • _ •. • • 1111111101 • Easement No.:29-23-5-S1032R 3xisting lawns, hydroseeding in unimproved areas,replanting of existing shrubs and xrshes or replacement of the same, where such will not Interfere with the District's use of the easement. Large trees that exist within the permanent aasernent area may be removed during construction unless otherwise noted in this 3asernent document. Fences, rockeries, and concrete, asphalt and/or gravel driveways which do not Interfere with the District's use of the easement will be •epaired or replaced. 3. ATTORNEY'S FEES. In case suit or action is commenced by either party, or their successors, heirs or assigns, to enforce any rights under this easement, or warding an encroachment on the easement, In addition to costs provided by statute,the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of attomey's fees in such sum as the Court deems lust and reasonable. 4. EASEMENT TO BIND SUCCESSORS. This easement is permanent and shall terminate only upon agreement of the parties hereto, their successors and/or assigns. This easement, during Its existence, shall be a covenant running with the CD land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs and assigns of the Grantor herein. C.0 CO C, • • P.04 O :VOI ._,w« Page 3 of 7 awaw • - ,p`�". ' .� sue_ 4 • •• • • NM .. . •• • '. .. • . . Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1032R IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantorls) has executed this agreement this /./ day of /H A R , 199a. (U r�Aw e l Nii4) THOMAS C.O'CONNOR STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING Isa On this Ptak day of / --c4 , 19 9V, before me per onaNy appeared THOMAS C. O,CONNOR,to me known to be the individuals described in 0; and who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged said CD instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantors,for the uses in and purposes therein mentioned. N CO WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. O CC 'f � NOTARY ICN In and ford or State of iff Washi on,residing at ^�� `. Pt*JC 4,8T s:::, My commission expires: i0 s, ..Nota.40,0) '4 wA fl • :i kianwenomanki.aoe Pegs 4 of 7 mow. _ 0 • nem Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1032R IN WITNESS EREOF,the Grantor(s) has executed this agreement this /1 day of_ /k , 199k WALTER STIEGMAN, MALCOLM g. HARRIS, Attorney in Fact ILSE STIEGMAN,BAAALCOLM S. FARRIS, Attorney in Fact STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING (as On this //74-A day of %narc4i , 19 `j ' , before me personally appeared WALTER STIEGMAN, By MALCOLM S. HARRIS, Attorney In Fact end H ILSE STIEGMAN, By MALCOLM S. HARRIS, Attorney in Fact, to me known to be the Individuals described in end who executed the within and foregoing instrument, O and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantors, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 0) WITNESS my hand end official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. ,s► 5174 NOTARY C In—4411Z4?-)and f State of Washington,residing at.a 'pt My commission expires: ,y�sfPF-- NOTApy—*— f ---�,� S.'.1s.►de... � ,�mo• ,: • P ° • ,,IO4 oc,a W n.00c Page 6 of 7 01.10w. $, .ram ='} '. • f. . --�.r„w td•'. j `'�9iF.,'_.+'Y ..Y. .Y. .;; .v •.u,,. .. fYtid • Ina ... v . . ass Easement No.:29-23-5-S1032R IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor(s)has executed this agreement this today of f`/k CUY-J,,,_ , 1998 . J C NEWTON r ESTE.LE J.NEWTON of, STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss On this l� ` day of Mwr-r—i_ , 19 98 ,before me personally appeared JACK NEWTON and ESTELLE J. NEWTON, to me known to be the individuals described In and who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, 40 t', and acknowledged said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantors,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. Cr ,,,,,u„'"a, a,2,� ,sio"F,oz. 9.ot NO Y IlL C In and for the State of ^'or _ lag: residing at '.. a:, :`a-.� Pueoc My commission expires: o :fir . ` P.°4: _ tee€ " d` I I r:io,'S OC oav5_nDOC Pigs 6 of 7 aawe • . . . • IMAM EASEMENT NO. 29-23-8-81032R 0411; - \ \` M o „ I I-1 yl L, 1. U } 1 h I z I I O, O ,uptp' sr 32ND,T. ' - I '- P\ J Q1 1 I / •i r • u I nacrr'• \ ,/, -�'- I - Is /.., 14 4111k. \ , 1 ) O u I I L I ) I ►o \ pj ,1 ) i° uai[ 1 3 I al I S. 34TH ST. 1 \ `, O 1 _ V•/ j1 L 1, ` tl1Y a YMiC.u,I--- \` O I MKT 1�1173 1 11 11 i1 �` \ GO L ,I , GO I 1 /A.ow, \ .� \ 0, h \ S -� Q u!� r11 7 . 1 1 W f�1 ° 1 • f 1 -r is .I a ^_ • '0 L% OM u O Mt tAll V I' as /It/ 11 K Il I, I • WIN EWER II EASEMENT NO. 29-28.8-81032R FiE: F:VA\Mm\Asa VsurEv42.0Mc PAGE 7 CIF 7 cs:\ 1 — RECORD OF SURVEY SW 1/4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. 1 • • V••S DVO D• •• ,t r� Nt .-•t••1.1 KI`7•fi ro•l.• t �K.000 0, I _l COLV `\jj c., a. 91 . ' 44 J7. I. 0 tIC00 p os A.. M IOYN PL_49 Z.1 ^ ri ENCRGAC7•uENT DETA4 I. g i 0 • :o.,K,..�..c.r. r 81f 0 •},% 1• loot` •OO !t • 8 r^ sM•07•'• 17+1/ I ` • '1,« +11 7cor i K•....•., DETAIL o . •rr - .Doc•t.tt•.clot t N i 3 / -if CD.CK•1 K,•••.W•N 1.030 r i CO. .0,/. t•1/. j x A I . M.ire••O..• 1 � ' O••G/ .1 1,r i ill I WW1. .DM LEGAL MU:04'110N no 17-11 r I •V.0..,1 110.Q ''•0,0</0- •...0 01.0f...it•0..1. 1 0 n(.0.170.11,J.,✓•C.O M:^ ,1. fl**1W/1.0,0,•V S(•t, V M 1053..N'•1 N.V.. mar,.(t.t1 N0•al w(KO w.a w't 1f" LEGEND 1.01 V 1(.••. ••.,••0 Irv,C.. ' .1•^••TD^ •f S7 3 .0,,`/O.....wo••••.(.,S 101�,("7.11D•C•t••O.•I'i t A .••K.,...,S.(DI.ro,Y 1•••O• s /.ca. 5)0 MI..oun.[.n lot.o•ID . y,10 y1 71NM C1110 R.1 0r C .100.1 .S • •It,3/7••(w In.1•1.11 0.0..3.1••••, •.r1.H Dr 1 0 •,CVO•1 00•I11 • C.tO C•f•C 6 .1 T.•.•D. 11••1.••S.. . _ SUR 1 0•�••.°7•0•. 1 77 Dal.0•Va14..•1•Clr'r w1 0 1t ✓W•••O.01•••(C 1..I Iv4•0•.••11510 00.0 T•111.00. NORTHh.• .,0•C..(.•S at 1.•,, ,(.7. ••• ••••..Or ••0M 7..\.O /1/1R I R ♦0011 MACS 0.,1...0 f•04%A..,. NO n....1 W 1•01 I f 1QQ• I.C•••,t•O.•nf I 1.A1C•0.g1.1•^•0.0,KWu• • 7 ) 71 •<(D•••Or • 0SONS Kt'd fC•0•01••• 1,.••••••M T••C U •D 7-,/0_D rr•••••••1',. •/I O'1.1 f 1• OW Mt • IIII(•/01• MIRfOR7 CaTRRJR fORTiT0i7 cQrvlun dki ‘ t '...T. STIEWAN ..1.✓CC.tc,l•.1.RSn•n.1w.wa r rt a mrn .F_ 10 THOMAS LAND SURVEYING •S1•,I.N0/..•1 1.•r ,14/.• • M D.K,•••.OPICIW.CE■••,^(WIL•1••.,t r.4 .; f SW t/( SECTION H, TDIwSNM Z.S N. �ANQ ! [. M Y • .•w_.yo./3"...•.• .•M 1.rZiri %OW.WCOMM••••lot•(rows,r •.(•1•s•rw . ►� 11200 WI MIXT WIT ' t•.•t e41/ •r A. r,aw• .1 n �7r�.1h.C.Fi iliocii _ IDC[0000. WA 0117711 o` •• i., ri •1r6n1 al• s>. M•f<.•l.0 ,1070 .l t•f1 RECORD OF SURVEY • PORTION OF THE NWI/4SWI/4 OF SECTION 29 , TWP. 23 N ., RGE. 5 E , W.M. 1 KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON ^/ Il LEGAL DESCRIP LION NOTES ••• M . •1/•M 'N W•••••I•I.1 y ••.I •1t, vIM1 ^ ••••r/• •1 11'{•1•••, •I `1 1 •• ., . • , 1 .I •1 JW IA•.••1• ••1•d f/ ;J• II. •4044,•/f•M•• u'wt. •, 1,0(•4/ - ••-I , ••' ' •/• go.• 7U ,rVJ •e••e•f( l••C1y Y0,,, w• s. • /.,••• ••• 11.s•••••VI,,•1•(,•• I, •.r ,N I// 1.•rn AI • M • • • I /s1/ 0sl•••••• •IN• 1•0•021•• ►.MM'•r M.:• NI •••M••0 0•••• 0040•r(0006 N I1//•lOSt4 A- - \ •rw•.•f.^0G•nr I 90D/[6:,o 1'. y • ♦ I !'• / ,s•((I ,O•/•ONe.uM1.1 rC1•I.OM /1 .•f•M 1.• ..F.a..Ai•a t"'6/VI KII/VG •Y'WY %It} v •.. • `I i 1 - •M-r V'( !•I`•• • WA 0,t1 ' ' \I!J•rrON U 011•000 ntM• IN:as, MI MI•Mf1Mrs IV r•VO•V . .,V 11111•• I • • • CMOMC•V/f0 y• I' 041 0I.11 10 SCALE , 1.• 100. \ ..•'A le'1 •N M 1 mrrr 1 '\ O . too SOO i I I I I I I I I I I ;I. 1 1 I�: '',' I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 L 1 �'i t l. „„h• N. t M N01;"::. .\ p X •• • aZw SURVEYOR'S. CERTIFICATE �...� ` fI5 i I C• f • ,r• ••s. i �I . w. •r wr1• Hy r,rlel�•n it • C • • f•f 11 1• f I l C,• � y 1V • •1\ 1•• •.M1.w..t. •I I.• 7VI1V I,w S V I S ` lr • •1,:q,.1 I`! 1S St COSo1Na ACT 11 11,. rq•..I •1 (jib •'f - R t.1••/• J••1••, i� r 1i • •• -" 1 I,;a /INr•1 ro1n yy ., �•11KMR IfI Or M!gY1' >< (••la i.� •Irrl M+ �. '�•^ rfoc 1 i7 I�a �1 �� s•1 • I /CO' ,I I I• .L4 • ir,+1 /11•rri� 1 wb••t w-[ ••x Ie e . • f 1r�rs ••J• \ 1 f. i !� \-1 1nw1•Jw••u••••1 »•r•erI•.•••1,.• I (r, \ oteNN ••••1•• RECORDING CERTIFICATE 1 ' t/• tee I - -. 'Mod for .00.• Ib•—••f d _-- 6 .w'o1 f•r 1s II__ . Vol •f $I Nf 1 • IIO 'rr •. P•/• •• 111. rf••N•1 •1 • s / -- • —_—_— - e� M...s., I ni ariti s ii �:• A..•r*ono N. 1 fr•+• IAl• l• , 407 2JI'�-- •W(A0II Suite M ♦ "1J MS__ _ - •� 11.1 Pes•II Isr• SW S r• ___-. _ _• 11 if"C :It Ify.1 11(N10N.WASHINGTON 01051 _ I••u rf.( 1•..,. 1l Plo..•:11011121e Slf! /f. N M Uf[ — •• ••• N ,f 10 Mf� • p•1••n" • WIZEN RECORDED RFTVRN TO! f4q«t • on,sar the ncpactete UTILITIES EASEMENT r n;. Ragan Municipal n.,,� 20(,1.1it1 Avow.South Grantor Renton.WA9R055 SiR: • Steed GAenect:ow • TT11S INSTRUMENT,made this day of 19 by and between Will-f E F; 1n1. S NJ and rL:;c (.• S r try/nJ • Ir er p ..01 Nye a.+.•(,)"4•er.tr and hereinafter called"Grantor(s),"and the CiTY OF REM-ON,a Municipal Corporation of King County,Washington, hereinafter called"Grantee." fat said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell,convey,and w:Irutts unfo the said Grantee,its surrrssors and assigns,an easement for public utilities(including water,wastewater, r") and Surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property -(tte right-of--way) in King County,Washington,more particularly described as follows: 7", See attached EXIIIBIT A for legal description ♦ For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing. installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining 7 ut litics and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal of ligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: . The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of th:easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as pr acticable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the casement as long as such use does not interfere with the e:semcnt rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the casement;or • b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the ut ilitics to be placed within the casement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the casement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring"he casement area and any private improvements therein. • d. Dig,tunnel or perform 5ther forms of construction activities on.the property which would disturb the . compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15) feet of the right-of-way. = This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs,successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this apseement. ra MOMMMal4 MT,rrer _1 Uflitiea Ir e"1 n•met. 1 _ riv•rtrwwev trrt J+wgJ C1...t1"I1 AS i tut f rant a , _ A 1— �_ � .. - and 'e G. il— �� and • INptvlt)VN.FQRM OF ACtCNOW1JD Ml NT t STATE OF WAS111NGTON' r ) ) Is COUNTY OF KING ) Halter Y. Stlegman • i certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Use C. Sttegman is the person who appe red before me,and {aid person acknowledged that(he/she)signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be(his/her)free and voluntary a_t for the uses ' and putp m s mentioned in the instrument Data1 /C/r/7 ' '-��1/ 1/ -/ . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at filde (print): /1"."5z , zrif// t ip_ My appointment expires: /-i9-f y ItEPRUENTATTvE FORM Qr AcQWLEAQMENrT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) C� - ) SS CI COUNTY OF KING ) r4 r1 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that_ signed this instrument,on oath stated that C4 he/sheithey was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of rsto be the free and voluntary act of such parry/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in 6? the instrument. CI) Dated _ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Notary(print): • My appointment expires: . R}ORATL rott!•t of nclytoICIP STATE OF WAS1lINGTON ; cil -11= sS COUNTY OF ICING ) On this y of , 19 ,before me persorud7 appeared In me known In he of the corporation that executed the withininstrnment, and acknneledge the said Instrument to he the free and volumtary act and deed of aid corporation, for the uses and pupates therein mentioned, and each nn mill stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrnmeiW and that the sal affixed is the corporate seal of said en-Towing, Notary Public in and rot the State of Washington Notary(Print) My amT^"Mment elitism — t.44.,.r........ r•MI...►.... • Exhibit A Legal Description rt'i'± ?ID- Cr -.ee zrst �leetneenieec 1sement Area; That portion of the below described panel defined as follows: • The West IS.00 feet of the South f21.50 feet:- . AND the North 15.00 feet of the South 121.50 feet thereof. • • Faresl DeScription; The North 330 feet. of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, W,Ighington. EXCEPT the East 660 feet thereof. CI a t;Q C • • Easersatisl twernotto,. u i • • ., _ A..'t•/d j '„ ,•_*'J ts.flI ytl I` • Mi i • —, ••• .. • Map Exhibit prefect • • • Legal Description no- • MI ST*. . Sven Lee reidie.c • TR.E t �:• 'f/ ' )Ir .. .�t yam's I f 28, a....•r••. ` % 28 129: .' ,..... • •el• sr. roil\40 \ C , WINSPER HIV. al iSia4ldee• Ia In _ s 4 a Is! so, • ��I< :1 I V •35 •3S, l33) N TR. 8 II . C' • pp[[ h•5 ,M. •:N..•i M Yr q�„ 4 A 1t.," aaf.r..der.. . LOT . { .... .. fN;trig .i1..• 1 S. 32ND PL. 1 1•3+. • o Ri�•1 x2 33 • • a4 3 3,3 ;8.! 9� �IOC 0 '` ^gyp r Zy/ Oar' �,[� /' .a• �.. ....•. :�i a — — — — —-- — — —3: 1�� •.•. .•.. _4. IY• .(-•. r,U f•r a, .0w ..s • .N.K )Ir of vJ ...•.•. • all r1 *.L.... .r.N..Pc... Irai 01 r J - 1 1 N i . • ,9/4 --r 1S' PERM. EASEMENT' r121.S0 ijot. Let3 ,• 1 ar.N �/ I..')'1f*Xi �1'. 1 KCSP 275022Ri8003210741 -I I-IS PERM. EASEMENT r 1I r _ . _ ____ - ...t . 1e12 1 •,; I Ic 4 I 1 T. " , Lest era, R m',• = . �:. / r .....• L ', - ___.._.� _�a_a.�� ` 1)1 •i — • —•.''..� .��� ., '1 • I1If pp i DOM4dr I ► I 1 CM".w I'm., • t' I' !n '• PITS Filed for Record Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1031 at the request of • SOOS CREEK WATER Project: TALBOT HILL TRUNK AND SEWER DISTRICT CONTRACT NO. 1-96S 1 4 616 S.F. 192nd Street Renton, Washington 98058 WALTER W. & ILSE C. STIEGMAN r 11436 SE 208th Street #141 Kent, Washington 98031 Pw AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT , s THIS AGREEMENT, made this /-5-- day of O<i , 19 , by and between SCOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter termed the 'District", and WALTER W. & ILSE C. STIEGMAN, hereinafter termed the "Grantors", W-1EREAS, Grantors are the owners of land at approximately 17000 101st Place SE, Renton, Washington, legally described as follows: In The North 330 feet of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in GiD King County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 660 feet thereof. La C W•IEREAS, the District requires an easement for a sanitary sewer line(s) and/or apourtenance(s) across Grantor's property at a location more specifically described hereinbelow; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Five Dollars and Fifteen Cents ($1,275.15) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the performance by the District of the covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Grantors hereby grant, convey and quitclaim to the District the following easement: The West 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of the at'lve-described parcel of land; AND the North 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of said parcel. .••nr • e,r • Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1031 Said easement is for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a sanitary sewer line(s) and appurtenances thereto, as designated above, together with the nonexclusive right to ingress to and egress from said portion of Grantor's property for the foregoing purposes. This easement is granted subject to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants which the parties hereby promise to faithfully and fully observe and perform: 1. COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE. The District shall bear and promptly pay all costs and expenses of construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer line(s). 2. USE OF PROPERTY BY GRANTORS. The Grantors shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement if such use does not interfere with installation or maintenance of the sanitary sewer line(s). Plantings of trees, bushes, large shrubbery, and the construction, installation and maintenance of structures or buildings of a permanent nature, including fences, within the easement area shall be deemed an encroachment upon the District's easement rights, and the Grantor shall be obligated to remove such encroachments at Grantors' expense. Further, the provisions of Paragraph 4 hereof as to restoration shall not apply to any such encroachments in the easement area. 3. THE DISTRICT'S USE AND ACTIVITIES. The District shall, if the real property or easement are disturbed by the maintenance, removal, repair, or replacement of such L facilities, restore the surface of the real property or easement as nearly as possible to the condition in which it existed prior to the commencement of maintenance, removal, repair, or replacement. 4. RESTORATION. For original construction, the District will restore Grantor's property to a condition as good or better than the premises were prior to entry by the District. r1 Photographs will be taken prior to construction on said property to assure the completeness of restoration. Final restoration will include, but shall not be limited to, sod replacement in existing lawns, hydroseeding in unimproved areas, and replanting of existing shrubs and bushes of the type that do not interfere with the District's use of the easement. Large trees that exist within the permanent easement may be removed during construction unless otherwise noted in this easement document. Fences, rockeries and concrete, asphalt and/or gravel driveways, which ?o not interfere with the District's use of the easement area, will be repaired or replaced. 5. ATTORNEY'S FEES. In case suit or action is commenced against the Grantors or the successors, heirs or assigns of said Grantors, for removal of an encroachment from this easement, the Grantors hereby promise to pay, in addition to costs provided by statute, such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees therein. ce eee n-,t..h.a..,,.,?.p Swp".."b« 70 1111111 PAGE 2 OF 4 Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1031 6. EASEMENT TO BIND SUCCESSORS. This easement is perpetual and shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs and assigns of both of the parties hereto. 7. EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX. This easement is granted under the threat of eminent domain proceedings by the District, and therefore is exempt from State Excise Tax. 8. DURATION. This easement is permanent and shall expire only upon agreement of the parties hereto, or their successors and/or assigns. 5 IN WITNESS WHERE F, we have set our hands and seals this /S day of 061z -o� , 197k. _)c 6—, -- W ALTER W. STIEGMAN e2,CC G3�ti..1 I STIEGlAN tn STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. C.p COUNTY OF KING ) CO On this /C day of �L17t�J{t� , 199‘ , before me personally appeared WALTER W. & ILSE C. STIEGMAN to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantors, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the dayda�nand year a ve written. ix NOTARY PUBLSin a5d for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: PAGE OF 4 '.....4"----..' RECORD OF SURVEY O PORTION OF THE NWI/4SWI/4 OF SECTION 29 TWP. 23 N RGE. 5 E W.M. V KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON n 1-31014110 \ (0•Nr e *: LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES ,v M•.• •,.ry/r a•.r!d•r.. e M NL•1•'. a r]/ ..Mr• ,1 30413$,1DN•, ;N/O•M•rr.H 'INN r R ,II•!, •1•••••• l•:r,1,4 . \w .Y •.,••.•.•11r OW••1.O 1/:/.04 M. ON'Nf•.•!s NO•rN, b 1Nr/•,N%MUM/ •N 1,. •,O•'. ...IN 1r •..., " -rf N.,1 f r•f• 4,/MO,NJ NO ne14r01.r ft,O•/„ .N•,N,1 CC.. • w• ••V.,., /41•• ,•r /•br MO?r,1•/400• 1' O,r r,/• In, 3M1w4 e' M- V. •M ,m w•••r.+r' t I 1V` i,rh.l 0J4,•I.H. .l/•OM 1'170,04. *OMAN"'er.'.' \I\ •.,ee a••0fe f'N6 CO•N rf Afee•OM•6 NO n,/,IOIN O B....0.•6r 400,1 1001.1 9aoy.. 'a,fNe su•/•r/e••ss�•• -- /ex•••x'm rN/ L :•3.PtNr NH0 . 0,4,04OMLNr.4,o,, - 7V///7} , ! NrN_Jr 11•• In Ja: 1pf llNb/Nr NLI•,Mb \w Ip• / M Itl - . 1 II AP ONO n ,l,.ys //r• „3O,A5 O Mi,00E0 MOM -NN/NO ./ONUMf Nf/N CI,/ •� ' r �w/l RO / /,ar lgeawl1Nry ro Mt NO•rN /»n/41 .Lift Ur cr.(elrr MuNUMLNr r MOM MOM nv SCALE ; I•• 100 \\ !r•r 1K s .N 0 100 200 SO0 • r r3r4 14.;; ;.R,/I(+/�' '.•: e. I �osuu•r N�^; i I I I I I I I I I I ,IIMI,, , 4 R':.. i`//°' 3\\ I (I I I I I I NIIII J .el i''• "JM,,,'..6"I J ,,r MI M • or ,.'�.� .i+'e:oNrs•,rN tar vr w-e sx n' . wI 7 1- Nf M+Ne SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE MS,Ne0•e. �.. y . , yv�-_ •t ES N • Tor'• . •, n r•c11f tpneMf • .v••r wea• t •I .11 .;� 1, rP•Ier w, alr•elf•. w •wl.ow•n c. r4 !__.r •f AQ6'�,Sfl r' ...�a..,N•,. N ^� oil I. lee 1••••••.•+1• •1 ,e• Su•v[• 1,`4 `` , -1- H•i/ I t ` RECORDING ACT e1 Ie• ...... 71 Ifl . •,!•'- $ r014 r,/a MIN a x /..•aan. m erK•er• . 'j WW 'for //�� 44 \ ^ G` �NLaw•N•U• Z /- •t•„Nw lf,Nr v •--7t .J u /,rWre. 13 MO,last t sir 1 /!6 le' ..1_-fir I t of if j 1:,, +' /" —_l_ •Nor 1>' • ig baZ � ''I. ,,, • .Lora ,. \� [Motif I*Norm,,,11 \,AM pMA,f,AN/'C•• �. Mo/[WPM /ea•v err-vnorweveMr 1 ; RECORDING CERTIFICATE I .w(t 1 J/J J/, [r0- !0't f e , - -- ..1ea If. r•UM• Mil__a•f •' Si • N!'O11,•L I) •1�� • , Vet__el S• — -- J //p/w0 MO•UM/N1 • Pale ,e1 Ike , 01 {r -- ---- --- --- Mena J,•e qn.d . . / �.. le'l' 1,•e•w' t..0 01 e•teraf • P•tet Co, we 'I 6 i 1 j -�ucA MONI/M/Nr ' •' Iltl try_._ _ — / _ •Il►ev.11 Ave.S M Suit*100 l• -- -- N ft Lf.[ JN.•f /elm A A 11EMTOM.N,AfMIMGTOM 0e053 /„ III r •s•,f L la/f„ lt. 'v ' reo••.:(mel t:els:e --- LeUNO MONUMLNr-% ,r CAM la•.• i» r, efa �wrlofrr+rfv• '•„ rho L.'M91.10• •. •�� i -----. .. _ _ ._.__ __. _._— _ ,. _. __ .—_.. .-— — - ass • • si.2i)43f3 voi 4875 PAGE 347 Pioneer National Title Insurance Company REAL ESTATE CONTRACT • WAJMINOtON Aril DIVISION THIS CONTRACT,made and entered late this 14 try of DEC?:IEEE r 15 between t?CS:rn: 1:C i•.C?=t::IG.:I berefeaftter retied the"ucn,'and b - lCi. C_:f�?:�.. C^ Mreinaftrr called the"purchuer," WITNFSSETH: That the seller aatsse to sell to the psrrhaaer sad the purchaser avow to purchase from the seller the lonowlna described real estate,with the appuressrecae, Y KI:'G Coeaty, suns of waaltlaatoe: r•orth :C` feet of the south half of the r.orth'.2ert onnrtf.r cf t c r•cuth::crt r't" rLcr; 1E.3S the cant CU.'', feet, ALL i^ .echo- , Toter . i� 2; :orth, 1:ar_r•e 5 E.W.E. A thirty foot ( C'} ::i:'c er rr -crt cc- u^it-,• ace( .a i.r rrcvitic : at 'oi'tn.:crt corner of -re c^ . • r.p„�•.i_-itel.:• „ sari,; si:- (5E) fell^d r... —]or-r- (3 to ; ,e to secs o' r^r -re. c•i:;r ..:thi^ o-c (1) ycrr. The terms and conditions of this contract an as follows: The purchase price is C i (12()enr•C.( Q ) Dollars of welch • (1] ,C'r( .'(` ) Doilen leave been paid,the receipt whereof Is hereby acknowledged,and the balance of told purchase price ehaa be paid ea follows: Cl 1J (1, ( . ( ) Dollars. or more at purchaser's option,on or before the i'i:: rl day of , 10 ' and l .. L.._.:) :.. ? 1 ( .; (; ) Dollars, or more at purchaser's option, on or before the day of each succee•tIna calendar mooth until the balance of said purchase price shall have been fully paid.The purchaser further tames to pay Interest on the diminishing balance of said purchase prior at the rate of(; per cent per annum from the 1 day of J- _- -' , 19 , , which Interest shall be deducted from each installment payment and the Falance of each payment applied In reduction of principal. All payments to be made hereunder shall be made at or at such other place u the slier may direct in writing. SALES TAX LIEN a • dY [,�.t •-'� tom -- As referred to In this contract,"date of closlna"shall be Fl -' 1,/-1=1 1C`.i•,. _. (I) The purchaser uaumes and •trees to pay before delinquency an taxes and assessments that may as between grantor and grantee hereafter become a lien on said real estate; and if by the terms of this contract the purchaser has assumed payment of env morteaer. contract or other encumbrance,or has Assumed payment of or agreed to purchase sub'-ct to, any taxes or Assessments now a lien on said real rotate,the purchaser sere s to try the same before delinnuency. in The purchaser sereet until the purchase price Is fully paid,to keep the buldlnes now and hereafter pieced on said rent estate Insured In the actual rash value thereof sralnt lose or damage by both tire and windstorm In a company acceptable to the .seller and for the seller's t,enelft, a. his Interest may appear, and to pay all premiums therefor and to deliver all policies and renewals thereof to ' the seller. (if The purchaser agrees that fill Ingwctlon of uld real estate has been made toed that neither the seller nor hit assigns shall he hell to any cm rnant ruse rtlne the condition nl any Improvements thereon nor shall the purchaser or seller or the assigns of either be hell to any rovenant or agnrmmnt for alterations, improvements or repain unless the covenant or agreement relied on is rnntalnnl herein or is in writing and an ached to and made a part of this contract. (4) The runhaser assumes all h.vants of damage to or de•irurtlon of any Impetrvements now on said real rotate or hereafter plarnl ther,.'n,and of the I.rt in,of said real est.sir or soy tun thereof Inc public use;and::ryes that r such dlamage,dr.iruction or reline sh.r It ramhtute a failure of consi,lrntlnn. In rev any part of said real rate in taken for pwhlic c Ihr port.", of the cun,lernn.,tlon award • remaining after payment of reasonable expenses of procuring the same shall be paid in the sell and apislb.l as Isivnseni on the pun tease piss a herein unless the.seder elect.In stint-the purchaser to apply all or a portion of such comic.•nation award to the re` "dine ear n-torsi• lion id any imprusrmrnts damaged by such latrine. In rase of damage or destruction from ,rrit innate! agaln•i. tf ' isms!• ui sine in•uranre remaining inter payment of the reasonable eeprme of pencunng the untie shall he el....ied to the reslnrati,rn • ,mtildlnc cal •m h in,pn,vements within a reasonable time, unless purchaser elects that said proceeds shall he paid in the seller fr. ..pldt.akm urn the purchase price herein. (5) The seller has delivered, or agrees to &diver within II days of the date of clodnr. a purchaser'. policy of title Inwranre In standard form,or a roe-„i'•rent therefor,Issued•ay n•.,,• 'c•r...•, In„ n-••s.., i,•..•.,, Insuring the purchaser to the full amount of said tnuchase print seal,_• '.»or damage by rraron of defect In ulcer's title to said real estate ea of the date of rinsing end containing no escrtaions other than the following: a. Printed reneral else-ptfnm appesrinn In said policy form; b. Liens or encumbrances which by the terms of this contract the purchaser la to assume, or u to which the conveyance hereunder Is to Ise made subiert;MA • C. Any ealsilne contract or contracts under which seller le purchasing said real estate. anel sire mortgage or other obligation, which • . seller by this contract aeren to pay,none of which for the purpose of this paragraph (St shall be deemed defects In seller's title S r- .v i 487E PAr.,E.348 •. fel If Wien Ude is said real ester*It=resets is at etridjhg tweeted et wretraeta ender which bier hi prechaiag rid real estate, oe awe mortise,oe other of ttoss whiff seller is is pal maw ogress to sake such payments��a."�, terms node and shaft . upon default.lM perchaaei shall have the right to raM any Qti a aaaewar7 to remove thebe applied to the payments next falling doe the serer elder tW Contract - (7) The seller epees,upon remltdag full payasast 4. the percher price gad interest is the manage above specified, tee execute and drllver to purchaser a statutory warranty deed to said real estate,excepting any part thereof hereafter taken for public use,free of encumbrances except any -t may attach after data of dosing throeek any person other than the seller,and subject to the following: rr--) ecI CD CV If) Unless a different date Is provided for herein,the purchaser shall be entitled to possession of said real estate on date of closing and to retain possession so lone u purchaser Is not In default hereunder.The purchaser eorenas s to kegp,lbe bulldinp and other improve- ments on said real estate in rood repair and not to permit waste and not to use, or permit the use of, the real estate for any Illeeil purpose.The purchaser cerement'to pay all service,inetseatlos or constriction charger for water,sewer,ekctridty,garbage or other utility • services furnished to said real estate after the date purchaser is entitled to paragon. (o) In case the purchaser falls to make any payment herein prereided orb maintain Insurance,as herein required,the seller may make such payment or effect such Insurance,and any amounts so paid by the seller,together with Interest at the rate of 10% per annum thereon . from date of payment until repaid,stall be repayable by purchaser os seller's demand,all without prejudice to any other right the seller - might have by reason of such default. ices Time Is of the essence of this contract,and it la agreed that In are the purchaser shall fall to comply with or perform any . condition or agreement hereof or to make any payment requited hereunder promptly at the time and In the manner herein required. the .oiler may elect to declare ail the purchaser's right hereunder terminated, and upon his doing so, all payments made by the purchaser hereunder and all Improvements placed upon the real estate shall be forfeited to the seller as liquidated damages, and the selmr shad have right to reenter and take possession of the real estate;and no waiver by(be seller of any default on-the past et the purchaser shall be construed u a waiver of any subsequent default. with respect to forfeiture and termination of purchaser's rights may be Service upon purchaser of all demands,notices or other papers made by United Steles Mail,postage pre-paid,return receipt requested,directed to the purchaser at his address lest known to the seller. (ll) Upon seller's election to bring suit to enforce any covenant of this contract, Including suit to collect any payment required • hereunder.the purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costa and expenses in connection with such suit, which sums shall be included in any judgment or decree entered In such suit. • If the seller shall bring suit to procure an adjudication of the termination of the purchaser's rights hereunder, and judgment Is 10 entered,the purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costs and expense In connection with such suit, and also the reasonable cod of searching records to determine the condition of title at the date such suit is commenced, which sums shall be Included In any judgment or decree entered in such wit. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Instrument as of the date first written above. =--,i.......,:.1.,e,,,A.4..,.s.-.1-144; t(a ea " � .;y .i Tv Ali ,Ten Pat) ._.__�_..__._._.�.__.. ...._ (wat) Cl —•-----.._ __ ___ _ (set) 4. VI STATE OF WASHINGTON, as . Co•-nty of Kier+ On this day penonaity appeared before mg Jesenh Komorn i3k i . • ' to me known to be the Individual described Is and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that •- Ihe signed the same as h i S free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes 1 et ', Id..test .' GIYffii�bodor my hand and official seal this 14 th y.. centhe en s 17 / day of ere • . ( , , . 4 _.... LL ruts • Notary Public rw and for Ike State of Wdshrwgroe/ (/ Marling M...._..._.._.._a t.a.t.t1e.. ......»._».... .. �_.� • • • J 1 I. •i F O I` ' ' r� RC I`, I .7 GC J L 1 I 7 \ \IL.. 6 Len a 0 l,r ; u Q _ r v ?8 P„! 3 2$ I f ilED for Riicord t Request .of y p / Aridness i s 4.0, S f' 7. si/ ,� (.1 �ZO 636`'7007 \,. .,4.-.oRoto 53.06._deeds ••Mtj*Ill L • Y _ "'72ii;-Rr9Uc5T-DF 314 u o `• \ - h Y '� t968 .JUk 24 P�1 2 O94,3 3 v)1 H I so r,, 4 �. , n m�tiR15 AL'^ITt;` ... oO A i:V; r i TY MASH 't7 t� I : al-4 to •a va cotom- _--____ tti. N )al M AI 3 I I t" • r• 0 EXECUTOR's rows L.4 It • Deed and Seller's Assignment of Real Estate Contract Y THE GRANTOR PAULINE SPURLOCX, E cutrix of the Estate of JOSEPH eceased, 1 for s OM�ORNISKYlue received convey S and to PAULINE SPURLOCK, as Trustee for JOHN KOMINISKI , as his . the mete., • separate property, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Xing State of Washington_including arty interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: The North 330 feet of the South 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4; LESS the east 660 feet, ALL in Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WM, • situate King County, Washington. A 30 foot wide easement for community access is provided at the • Southwest corner of said property. • Pursuant to Order of Solvency entered May 13, 1968, King County Superior Court Probate Cause No. 193216. • and des hereby aseign.transfer and set over to the grantee that certain real estate contract dated the 14thday of December, 1966 between JOSEPH KOMORNISKI as seller and RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE as purchaser for the sale and purchase of the above described sal estate. The grantee hereby assume s and agree S to fulfill the conditions of said real estate contract and the grantor hereby covenant that there is now unpaid on the principal of said contract the sum of Dated this 21st day of June, 1968. Executrix of t e Estate of 1TOSEP+l KOMORNISXY', Deceased:.isut) STATE OF WASHINGTON, 1 sa. • County of King On1 this do penonally op K+red before me PAULINE SPURLOCX, Executrix of the Estate to ftne�ieOnown o Iv ltto yscc u'l' dscelsrd'and who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. RIEQUI e� hand and Ada! setl4tie :y:'2'tt a ay of June, 19614T 1. AFT. PIt.,11 1��� �� �v.f �f' / --•= — JUN 241968 ,. ` -t._..< :ram r s---- . ln'�3 lacy Public in and Inc the State of A'a,hinRlon, • M. J„R 1{.L1AM3 • :. - riding at Seattle. a„ra .rtrYaru ti 304-'s+••.O PIONEER 10NAL. ~y,,• N4r• ' . '''Cw'',..' •I 0 e 'do .c-j TITLE INS ACE "'1 VACt NLMD ad hCC✓'. t ti ' sr,.14ftu01►+•;'.:• 1 .tip c.) Filed far Record at Request of t ,�► Mcv 11 3 01 ?W A t 1 ' �c t a ,. •TO �-•� RI C' • % ;,'t:C 1 IONS r: , t / _4er, 0 L i.!. C I. 81 1 Y' Mod':4 t• 1i t' PE r 7.Ctit '' ei' C A H'=L .....",i "i Statutory Warranty Deed 2- 'ram LS91; t; t CORPORATE roRM s lq THF. GRANTOR REN'*ON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE t for and In consideration of Ten ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable t O consideration ' N in hand paid,conveys and warrants to WALTER W. STIEGMAN and ILSE STIEGMAN, his wife, Si eti .a t•1 the following described real estate, situated in the County of King , State of tCIDWashington: ! The North 330 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of 1 Yt the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 _ E.W.H. , EXCEPT the East 660 feet thereof. ;' •d S LLS revs PAI D C l Ce r1RIXT ArT.NO, E Y0/0/0 ;� T iKING CO.�R�ECCRDS D;';i�.-:t e '. !'f U e.,CA L-t ,Cu RY 1 r This deed is gives in f.ltlllseat of that cartels cask estate contrast hetwee■ the parties hereto, +� M dated March 30 , 19 77 , aid eoadltto.ed for the eoareyanee of the above '; 'j described property.sad the covenants of warranty herels co.talsed shall sot apply to any title, ;; interest or encumbrance arising by,through or ender the purchawer is said contract. aid shall not yht apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges levied, assessed or becoming due subsequent . e. " to the date of said contract. 4al [state Midis. Tax eves paid on this solo or stamped .xempc on April 7, 1977 M., No.7704070239. 14 s rt f r ,^ t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be emoted by Its proper officers "c ..31 7 and its corporate seal to be hereunto axed this day of November, 1981. 'j Y" t`..' a.,.-.:' REMTOH...CFAJRcE...OF...TH.E..NAZARENE t�. •r P.' mtrriArrt t t '. k,j' ,t' Secrete F xy STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) r 1';z- *2, Cou nty of KING }1 IV On this day of Nov caber, 1981 before me the undersigned, i4 ": r: a N blk in and for the State of Washington, duly ; 0,. .� Ica.a.at<./ and Ult./mom,Q J mot.,,., �. • ) 1t�NTON CHURCH T THE me President Secretary,and respectively,d '7 • : the ttoe that =rcrtd the foregoing laetrentient, and acknowledged r,•r r; '�.'�� �s eowfedted the said hattmnrsesml to be the free and h aid deed of saki corporation, for the arts sad purposes thereto meatiosed, sad on oath staled that 'e`I- �. 1 elan. aatMrf•..1 to esecra the said tnstn.eent and that the wet amsed Is the corporate veal of mid r Cr s ,ferry Whine wy hid and official berme alibied the day sad year fist 'Amy whew. ''" ect./ :: •a ;�:•� G ,� X cy IrNlr ki•end .......... ^kti llit► /e w Sire e/ M uAMsyr«s, ,-,4 - ,.x tar rr'. r++df et Renton. .. •, DRAINAGE RELEASE This agreement made this a7 day of �p?/(, . 190' r4 Walter W. Stiegman hereinafter called the GRANTOR. and KING (c COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Cl hereinafter called the GRANTEE. end whereas GRANTOR CD represents end warrants that it is the owner in fee of that certain parcel of land, described es follows: rq OSW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23, Range 5E. UD Tax lot 40 situate in King County, Washington.un !` and whereas the GRANTEE is presently reviewing a drainage plan for a proposed subdivision permit for the project known as Liberty View. file No. 87-698, on land located at: 24 acres lying generally bet.4esn S.E. 168th and 170th Street (if extended) and generally between State Route 55 and State Highway 167 1 and whereas amid plan propoa.,a to divert from their natural course of flow certain surface ana storm waters so as to cause them to CEASE TO FLOW onto the land of the Grantor, now, therefore, in consideration of the approval of Grantee of diversion in said plan, the grantor hereby agrees end consents to the diversion of surface and storm waters FROM ITS LAND and to hold Grantee harmleea for any damage that say be caused by such diversion of flow end this conveyance shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon GRANTOR and its hairs, successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set oet.higf hands: = -, ,--7,- -1A11.CLL-0-....ikti en �-,•--c GRANTOR � 4, am 0643 y Wei GRANT R r 62 'AO Trrgt OF WASHINGTON) RECG F .00 i a., o= ) as CASHSL +++++,Cif COUNTY OF KING ) 11 f On this day personally appeared before me A✓Acr"" ¢' 1/"4" ___SljE yYi to se known to be th. individual(a) ...r►•••%%%I described in and who executed the within and foregoir 4. °HNAR �,�rinstrument, and acknowledged that they signed the gem., es =si, 4ro 4� {(ftair free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and j kOTA R p�rpoaea therein mentioned. Sc:: , 0 )- a PUBL4C .�,% Given under •y hand and official seal this .7i day .,,1„, \ NA 3 IMF �f , 1988. Notary public in and for the' StAbta of, , , • ,, �+ 'ti,,» C� __pa ington, residing at� � _& __ 1% ':ti •. k\ Y► , 1 ,roller WAS�)`�`,): "'' 7�' List �.1 �t)IARI rt;n C ;1 —..._._ _ - -ram v)5t()1ry(;s 'rUrt� YU CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1998 TO: Carrie Olson-Davis FROM: Sonja J. Fesser `���rr SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat,LUA-98-026-SHPL November 30, 1998, Restrictive Covenant Memo Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced memo written by Jennifer Toth Henning on November 30, 1998, which lists suggested language for three items that address the Hearing Examiner's Conditions (Nos. 3, 5 and 7) for the above noted short plat. It is our opinion that all three items (and the associated language as noted in the memo) can be noted under a"NOTES"block on the short plat drawing, and need not be included as restrictive covenants at all. This would eliminate the need for the City Attorney to approve a covenants document as to form. Condition No. 3, as listed in the Hearing Examiner's Decision, does state that a restrictive covenant is required for the said condition. The above-mentioned"NOTES"block would suffice as a substitute for a separate restrictive covenant. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\0223\RV981202.DOC F17 Thomas Land Surveying PHONE NO. : 253 863 9897 Dec. 01 1998 10:01AM P2 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2189 Z9230 5-904 0 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 2 - • Project File#: Street Intersection: 534 ST Wc°! S Ave. S. Reference Number(g)of Document%assigned or released:Additional reference numbers arc on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Wa(kec r I1 1. City of Renton.a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) SW %y , Sec. 2.9, 7'23N, RSE ,W.M. The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal thc day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM or STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF ICING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thc uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated:• „ - 00O2 rinr'. -r. - Thomas Land Surveyir PHONE NO. : 253 863 98� Dec. 01 1998 10:01AM P3 • • Project: Exhibit A WOE Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet, of the South half,of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29,Township 23 North, Range 5 Fast, of the Willamette Meridian; Except the East 660 feet thereof,and described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel,being also the Northwest , corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- s/8 zo5•7'7 80, records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'--3 ''W 205 feet,along `�s " `�' the East line of said parcel,being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection o1ce,Y. lu+-IY tx with the center line of South 34th Street, as shown on said plat; thence 'T C ''xu T' S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street,to its' intersection with the center line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of Wells Ave. South; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left,having a radius of 25.00 feet, the central point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along the South line of proposed street dedication, to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel, to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.17 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52"to the West margin of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet,to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. g` CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 1998 TO: Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services Sonja Fesser, Technical Services FROM: Carrie Olson-Davis, Plan Review SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT • LUA-98-026-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Attached is the most recent revision of the above-referenced short plat Deed of Dedication document. Also, I have included a letter from Jennifer Henning to Tom O'Connor regarding suggested language for a restrictive covenant that is to be placed on the face of the short plat drawing. Mr. O'Connor would like your help in selecting which language to use;thereby, eliminating yet another drawing review. When he receives your suggestions, he will update the drawing and resubmit for review, hopefully the last. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks for your help. • C:\W IN W ORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN6.DOC FROM : Thomas Land Surveying PHONE NO. : 253 863 9897 Dec. 01 1998 10:01AM P2 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2189 • DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 2 7-2 3-S- M O Project File#1: Street Intersection:S314 ST 4 We I I5 Ave. S. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers arc on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Wa II-er tit se Sfe:jmanTrusl 1. City of Renton. a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional Iegal on page ) Svv % , Sec. 2.9, 7'23N, P. SE , W.M. The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as numed above.the above described real estate situated in thc County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor • City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS • ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF ICING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thc uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: • Hfonnsixxaf M'AGREv0002.I OC\ckd Pagc I 1=QR\t 04 0001rhh FROM : Thomas Land Surveying PHONE NO. : 253 863 9897 Dec. 01 1998 10:01AM P3 Project: Exhibit A WOO PID Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: • 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet,of the South half,of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,of the Willamette Meridian; Except the East 660 feet thereof, and described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel,being also the Northwest corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- 80,records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'36"W 205.78 feet,along the East line of said parcel,being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection with the center line of South 34th Street,as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street,to its' intersection with the center line of Wells Ave. South,as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of Wells Ave. South; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left,having a radius of 25.00 feet,the central point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along the South line of proposed street dedication, to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel,to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.17 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52"to the West margin of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet,to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. • RfonnuNXFR\I.A aE.'0002.DOC`ckd Page 2 FORM 04 0001/tm FROM : Thomas Land Surveying PHONE NO. : 253 863 9897 Dec. 01 1998 10:02AM P4 EXHIBIT MAP VNNSPER II SO1 48.36'W 205.78' 2-5 '25' I 2 1 N� 4 N o0 r�N N WELLS A . S. SDt'So'32'w N in 25.25'- csiTo �` 1 e=66-33'S2 7 R..25.00' o �A+83'26'08' 5 6 `L=37.77' a R$40.7 1 If 7 L21. 21. -ik.1.<"3 :1 IN ORM I N PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION �- 0 i- N a ,4 ' TRACT 'A' U, z t W N N 8 g I r if/7,w/.../// • tn\ •, 4'S, I" 7' 9 of WAS: O - i'-' 4•44. :411-"P‘'. " 741 S % . ' ew A 1' .of 16930 i 21.1 21' j j_ta Lao 14 D PIRES: 12-1-1999 II- 19-98 42 08' I' NO1'53.41'E Mform/naf-RM/AGREE/OO1.DOCckd Pogo 3 FORM 04001/bh t November 30, 1998 Tom O'Connor O'Connor and Associates, LLC 1707 South 341st Place, Suite C Federal Way,WA 98003 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS (FILE NO. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H, ECF) Dear Tom: The restrictive covenant sent to me via facsimile needs to be revised prior to sending it on to the City Attorney for review. The covenant should use the same language as stated in the Hearing Examiner's Conditions No. 3 and 5. Suggested language follows: 1. Development of Lot 8 and/or Tract A is prohibited until such time that appropriate access as required by the Renton City Code is constructed, and all required permits and approvals are obtained. 2. Development of either Lot 8 or Tract A requires the installation of full roadway improvements according to City of Renton Code requirements. In addition, it makes sense to also record a restrictive covenant to address Condition No. 7. The language should be similar to the following: 3. That portion of the wetland buffer that is located on Lot 6 and Lot 7 shall be maintained free of any structure whatsoever, and a fence shall be erected to delineate the edge of the buffer. The restrictive covenants would need to be recorded prior to or with the plat. The City will need to convey the covenants for recording after the City Attorney has approved them as to form. Please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7286 if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager H:\DI VI S I ON.SAD E V E LO P.S ERODE V&PLAN.IN G\PROJECTS\9 8-026.JTHIRSC V.DOC 4i r i-s' CITY ( r RENTON .41. ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 25, 1998 Tom O'Connor O'Connor and Associates, LLC 1707 South 341st Place, Suite C Federal Way,WA 98003 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS (FILE NO. LUA-98-026, SHPL-H,ECF) Dear Tom: The restrictive covenant sent to me via facsimile needs to be revised prior to sending it on to the City Attorney for review. The covenant should use the same language as stated in the Hearing Examiner's Conditions No. 3 and 5. Suggested language follows: 1. Development of Lot 8 and/or Tract A is prohibited until such time that appropriate access as required by the Renton City Code is constructed, and all required permits and approvals are obtained. 2. Development of either Lot 8 or Tract A requires the installation of full roadway improvements according to City of Renton Code requirements. In addition, it makes sense to also record a restrictive covenant to address Condition No. 7. The language should be similar to the following: 3. That portion of the wetland buffer that is located on Lot 6 and Lot 7 shall be maintained free of any structure whatsoever, and a fence shall be erected to delineate the edge of the buffer. The restrictive covenants would need to be recorded prior to or with the plat. The City will need to convey the covenants for recording after the City Attorney has approved them as to form. Please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7286 if you have any questions regarding this letter. r-- Sincerely, ':-..,11 04\ kmAA.,6 Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager H:\DI VISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-026.JTH\RSC V.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 atThis oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%nest consumer FROM : OCONNOR AND ASSOC LLC • HONE NO. : 2069523358 v. 24 1998 02:14PM P1 • • O 'Connor & 44.s s o cia t�s, •.L. . . C. VacaImlle Ttaasmlttal Shoot •Corn T, - D • Fax Number: Total No.of Psis Inclodlog CoTeri P2 oa.iwmbsa Saadas's Nimbus • . Toss Wawa Nombsa • Urgent O Pox Review. DPW**Comment Onus Reply O Huss Recycle • Notes/Comm:0a • • Ace_ 0/ -7Zz. Xd /474 4atii6 za4 /9,,e1.;: : 3s� /(4-e-eV‘ • .moo „a_A-siterk- 0..16 cx-t-t_ev • . • 1- r - S`''Pre '11►9i •_r:re. FROM : OCONNOR AND ASSOC LLC HONE NO. : 2069523358 v. 24 1998 02:15PM P2 • O ' CONNOR & ASSOC . , LLC 11/24/98 Development of Tract A and/or lot 8 of the Stiegman Short plat will requite that South 34t)' St. and Wells Ave. S. be fully improved to the West and to the South boundaries. Said improvements will be designed to city code and approved by the Public Works Dept. prior to issuance of permits for construction. 1767 S. 341". PLACE. SUITE C ' PEUE.RAL WAY. WA • 98003 TAC: (253) 9.52-336A - SEA:(253) 815-8856 - PAX: (253) 552-3358 CITY OF RENTON - ' \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 20, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 S 204th Place Kent WA 98031 SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat, LUA-98-026-SHPL Dear Mr. Jaeger: The third review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once all comments have been fully addressed please resubmit four(4)copies of the bluelines. Comments for the Applicant: An updated Plat Certificate (dated within 45 days of Council approval of the street dedication) is needed, if not already provided. The Deed of Dedication can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat and the associated document(s) are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The short plat should be recorded after the street dedication. The recording number for the street dedication should be noted on the short plat drawing in the space provided. Note that Wells Ave. S. is incorrectly noted as S.Wells Street on the drawing. Remove the last"-H"from the"City File No."on both drawing sheets. Note the corrected dimensions for Tract 'A' on the attachment(sheet 2 of 2), which were based on dimensions given in the previous submittal. See the attachment(sheet 1 of 2)for circled items that need clarification or correction. Applicant needs to draft language to appear on the face of the plat to address decisions #3 and#7 of the October 5th Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision. If you have any question, please contact me at(425)430-7235. Sincerely, 1911eYi .bOtANN4- Carrie K. Olson-Davis Development Services, Plan Review Enclosures: Map cc: Neil Watts Kayren Kittrick Yellow File LUA-98-026 \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\C:\WINWORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN5.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 Jica_.. ESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S). iS PPEARED BEFORE ME "ORGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES ,ITIONED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND. AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS ._1998 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T 0 N 1/4 COR n CALC POSITION AS PER ; CONC MON w/BRASS PLAT OF WINSPER DIV. 1 w DISK AS FOUND FOR 0,• f- PLAT WI' ' ' DIV 1 • • %r, Cr, E0.30' 15 90' P• LINE v 1 FND 1•-95 7 O 7 z 2631.18' #;. N89'17'33'E 2658. 10' ( CTR SEC � E 1/4 COR CONC MON W/BRAAS DISK AS FOUND FOR . OF WINSPER CALC POSITION AS PER Div. 1, EC.3i '0' TO LINE PLAT OF WINSPER DIV 1 FND 12-95 N NOTES: 4 ^' THE WETLAND BUFFER ON LOTS 6 AND 7 SHA WHATSOEVER, AND A FENCE SHALL BE ERECTS �909•94 2"h SE COR. NE 1/4, SW 1/4 liAD8 CASED MON AS FOUND FOR PLAT OF WINSPER N. i �sRS.S DIV. 1 NO.04' etW0.01' `• 1 6) 0. FND 12-95 -I 6 6' \ N. rn . 7 `° - • ,._ ---- CITY OF R E N TON M ON v NO. 1866, CASED CONC 3 MON W/BRASS DISK Z ND 1-96 - • ,r Cr, C .ti • 4 I S 1/4 COR CASE; r'ONC. MJN AS FP PLAT OP. WINSPER Di D . 1 I FND 12-95 ___ . � l6.117,6-•G.I-1 l L_T-- (I-1-.1= 1" 1 C' " 2 .6,—t- zs G4-4--1.-L Z OF" 2 ) S 1/4 COR • CASED CONC MON • t3 W/BRASS DISK AS PER . 0 PLAT OF W1NSPER DIV. 2 00 (CITY OF RENTON MON c�i \ NO. 1494) FND 1-1996 o _ I I I 6 i 7 i 8 9 I 10 24' 24' r, ,1' i 1 I 100.00' 25.04' 25.04' 0 0 F. o 0 iri o o CO (L) 5 N / S88'40'34"W 100.00' / N O n f z N / Z O 0 I C 0 - I ---- 2 o 6 00' 25' N 075' o W\' \ O co cD '!, 3 I zap o v a if, S88'40'34"W 100.00' to > 0<w w oI I V N 0 v I- z Q cc) -1,- I S9'L8l k!w ` z i ,SZ'Z99c. I `� I 43ll dldNfl I G'S Ijis , ` I Easement No.: 29-23-5-S1031 i a TR.A • E R O v ? I 11 N 5 I �___- IRO 1 2 4 s 6 7 9 9 10 O 11 1S V /A7 :Mt ADM SS WAI l♦STI(CM AN 11436 St 206IN Si ,14I Kr NT• WA 91,11)3I 5. . —0 1;197.- ,,�.a.� . ...onI I � t FOOT I ! II9•t . /2I 23-5\ _ ` son - 1A 11rT.r 3 ,olr. sr ro ar. _ io COOT. - - ----- ...4 i 4.4 C, Nl v n AODNr:: l AlaA CANONI 16 v9 A.'11A,dr St l NOW. CA 4,45. .1-.I II 1"1 III': .I(! u 11 I .111 ;� :„ 1 I I il. . , .. . . _ ______ 4 - --- - - `~' SCALE 1 100. TALBOT HILL TRUNK CONTRACT NO. 1-96S EASEMENT NO. 29-23-5-S1031 r PAGE 4 OF 4 r'04,6601% .•004tK. ..1 too•s.ot.rriber to. 1HA prn CITY OF RENTON . ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 17, 1998 Mr James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent WA 98031 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN DEED OF DEDICATION DOCUMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVIEW Dear Mr. Jaeger: Mr. Thomas O'Connor submitted the attached deed document for review on November 11, 1998. Please make noted changes and return to me for further processing. We will let you know when it can be submitted to Council for acceptance. The short plat drawing is still under review. If you have any questions please contact me at (425)430-7235. Sincerely, 0,94-0-4 - AtttA):4-- Carrie K. Olson-Davis Development Services, Plan Review cc: Thomas O'Connor Kayren Kittrick Yellow File C:\W IN W ORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN4.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 i Pern/LA o RRA�F AFNTow NOV1 > 1998 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS RECE/VED MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 1998 TO: Carrie Olson-Davis ' FROM: Sonja J. Fesser j1C ' SUBJECT: Stiegman Deed of Dedication Document Legal Description Review We have reviewed the above referenced deed document and have the following comments: Both Exhibit A(the Legal Description)and the Map Exhibit need to be stamped, signed and dated by the applicant's surveyor or engineer. The Map Exhibit needs to have the appropriate bearings and distances noted on the exhibit. Also, include a north arrow on the drawing. Note that one of the street names(Wells Ave. S.)noted in the space provided for Street Intersection (Page 1 of the deed document)is noted incorrectly as S Wells St. See the attachment for legal description items that need correcting. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\U:\SFESSER\STIEGDED.DOC r • • Return Address; P Ty O Rv/ City Clerk's Office ENTpN City of Renton NO V 1 2 199 1055 S. Grady Way R 8 Renton,WA 98055-2189 CEfVEp DEED OF DEDICATION _ Property Tax Parcel Number: 2 9-2.3-S-4 0 Project File#: t StreetIntersectian, S 34 St st, 5 Wells S-r- "`, Refsrmce Numbar(s)of Documenla assigned or relaxed:Additional refirence numbers are on page Grantor(,). Grantee(a): 1, W a! <+-*=I S e S-a:,wr an,Tr 4$f 1. CitY of Renton. a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page 3) Sw '/4, Sec. 2,9, TZ3N, 1 . SE , tel The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit clams,dedicates and donates to the Grentee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington, IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto sat my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(a): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I imow or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned:n the instrument, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Hfomu/nxPRMJAGREE/0001.DOCK okd Page 1 PORM C4 COO 1 bh • Project; Exhibit A ?ED I' Legal Description GRANTOR Street I 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet, of the South half, of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of the Willamette Meridian/described as follows: Except the East 660 feet thereof. Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel, being also the Northwest corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- 80, records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'36"W 205.77 feet, along the East line of said parcel, being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection with the center line of South 34th Street, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street, tots' intersection with^S Wells Street,as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of South Wells Wit, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of -Seifith Wells Street; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non- tangent curve to the left,having a radius of 25.00 feet, the central point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along,the South line of proposed street dedication, to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel, to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.18 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52"to the West margin of South Wells Street, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. HforawxxxFR'f CAO EE'0001.DOC d ?Iv 2 FORM 04 000 vbh 1 1 II 8 r, g 8 I . I C 5 Il I8 I s NI 2 T 7 v 3 J __ 4 S 34TH ST. — /I S 34TH ST. f =� w \I PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION I 4 TRACT 'A' I 0 4 0 § c-r) CITY OF RENTON Wi � Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 04, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 S 204th Place Kent WA 98031 SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat, LUA-98-026-SHPL Dear Mr. Jaeger: The second review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments.and make the necessary changes. Once all comments have been fully addressed please resubmit three copies of the bluelines. Comments for the Applicant: The drawing indicates that there is to be a dedication of a portion of S. 34th Street and Williams Ave. S. (see the attachment). A Deed of Dedication document is required if this is the case. (See enclosed form.) Please contact Kayren Kittrick,the Project Manager for this short plat who handles the dedication process. A dedication requires Council approval and cannot simply be accomplished through the recording of this short plat. Make provision for the recording number of the dedication deed on the short plat drawing. The dedication document can be submitted with the short plat for recording, but should be recorded first and referenced on the short plat drawing. Also note on the drawing that portions of the right-of-ways shown (show which portions)were dedicated per the recording of the plat of Winsper II and note the recording number of said plat. Provide the city with an updated Plat Certificate(dated within 45 days of Council approval of the street dedication). Note the city's land record number(LND-20-0223) on the drawing. The land record number should be noted in smaller type than that used for the land use action number. Note the land use action number in larger type than is currently shown on the drawing. Note all existing easements, agreements, covenants, etc. on the drawing. Note all encroachments on the short plat drawing. The City of Renton monument numbers for the ties to the City's Survey Control Network are reversed. There are some errors in the bearings in the"Line Data"table. Addressing for the lots is as follows: Lot 1 - 3302 Wells Ave. S., Lot 2 - 3308 Wells Ave. S., Lot 3 - 3316 Wells Ave. S. or 1004 S. 34th. St. (depending on the orientation of the house to the street), Lot 4 - 1005 S. 34th St., Lot 5 - 3301 Wells Ave. S., Lot 6 - 3307 Wells Ave. S., Lot 7 - 3315 Wells Ave. S. or 910 S. 34th St. (depending on the orientation of the house to the street), Lot 8 — 900 S. 34`h. St. and Tract 'A' — 909 S. 34`h. St. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\C:\WINWORD\CDAVIS\SHRTPLAT\STIEGMN2.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . November 4, 1998 • Page 2 The street names noted should be City of Renton designations and not King County names. See the attachment. Provide a signature line(s) for the property owners under the Approvals block. Remove the"NOTICE"and "FUTURE PERMITS"blocks. The comments contained within said blocks are not necessary. In fact,the"NOTICE"block includes a reference to "Pierce County Auditor". Also, remove the block noted below the Recording Certificate block that starts with the name and address of the original tract owner. Again,this information is not necessary. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements, dedications and/or agreements (to the City or other third parties), they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. For easements, indicate on the drawing to whom the easement is granted. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The short plat should have the first recording number(except if there is a street dedication). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) should be referenced on the short plat drawing in the appropriate location(s). If new easements are shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots,then include the following statement,juxtaposed to the subject easement(s): "Area for private easement for(water, sewer stub, gas, access, etc.)." Since the new lots created via this short plat are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no easement until such time as ownership of one of the lots is conveyed to others,together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Also, add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT The owner of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof. This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. Applicant needs to draft language to appear on the face of the plat to address decisions #3 and#7 of the October 5th Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision. If you have any question, please contact me at(425) 430-7235. Sincerely, K 64z-efo-L-dA5-- z- Carrie K. Olson-Davis Development Services, Plan Review Enclosures: Map Deed of Dedication Form cc: Neil Watts Kayren Kittrick Yellow File LUA-98-026 'G INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE z iWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES �QXVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS FUTURE PERMITS Vw cn THE APPROVAL OF THIS SHORT PLAT IS N, W N w0 WILL BE GRANTED. o 22 dINGTON RESIDING AT EDGEWOOD ~oao a ° wz0›- H x(za 0 wcnao z L 0 I LOT O i 1 N 1/4 COR J, 2 CALC POSITION AS PER ry 3. 4_AT OF .WINSPER DIV. 1 CONC MON W/BRASS 4 • U DISK AS FOUND FOR 5 z o 0 0 �— PLAT OF WINSPER DIV 1 N o 0 0 %, Q, E0.30' 15 90' TO LINE j 6 N CV- :4- v FNC 12-95 ` 8 T p :N. � QZNF- Qw W0 v . 89'17'33'E 2658.10' WU N •• N ( J7 cviN E 1 4 CORQ 00 00W ao • co zw c CALC POSITION AS PER bi m zZ :LAT OF WINSPER D(V. 1 L0N F- Foo — Q eUZJ wo N MU a- Q Z JJJ d' � m0U • oc oW a_ L H. U)0� NOTES: ~ THE WETLAND BUE ER ON LOTS 6 AND 7 S WuATSOEVER, AND A FENCE SHALL BE ERE( l .A10 ,,,,,....,. .. .. J • Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2189 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: Project File#: Street Intersection: Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) • My appointment expires: Dated: Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/0002.DOC\ekd Page 1 FORM 04 0001/bh Project: Exhibit A WO# PID Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: Hfocros/xxxFRM/AGREE/0002.DOC\ckd Page 2 FORM 04 0001/bh Map Exhibit Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/0002.DOC\ckd Page 3 FORM 04 0001/bh . 1 . Return Address: -r� City Clerk's Office Siip_ i, - e a City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2189 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 2'3 30 S-9 O 4 o Project File ii: Street Intersection:5 34 ST. We lis Ave. S. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Wa I4er dII se St i m e anT us+ 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation Cl LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) Sw %y Sec, 29 TZ3'/ R S E w.M. X T'I X T. v The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benetits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. . �titinmu l uur 1� tiNit, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year\ t-ret €n Approved and Accepted By: �'\ ?,% 8 Grantor(s): 41 tee(s): City o£ en �i(�a.L?�P.t, • 7� a , b fta4 . 4:, __ ' /'i.4, 1 ayor Jesse T N. 0) Le) Zi/�f'P �]l7 �. �/' f ED SE o l pp "'«flif11111111‘1U��� cr, ay � 'i'`� �t� City Clerk ,Ia yn J. Petersen c. INDIVIDUAL FORM dA'er \/ '~S AT OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) `�,"N‘\\` I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1\t a.k rn S. F Notar g'it o �kI iin box fog 0 rr l�0arr%s,25 �.Fecneyy •‘n fact signed this instrument and CD 4►-,�."""%iyrigacknowledged it to be his/her/tIttir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes Y C1 1mentioned in the instrument. �J2,.lker• S{i err a- 7 td• t��"Y i Ilse S�'%eyman i ,t 4��'° r = Notary Public in and for the tate of Washington ii t' 4 Notary(Print) Wilt-2 V.k.o11t E'Aeen Adamo c 11 w My appointment expires: pit .%{. 02. 1‘‘‘‘..•%• Dated: co' 17_•3.ga riih'epcx,s cu co— CT E L6 f34 i a/PR/9p . 00 .on • Project: Exhibit A WO# PID Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: 42 foot Street Dedication for South 34th Street That portion of the North 330 feet, of the South half, of the Northwest quarter, of the Southwest quarter, of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of the Willamette Meridian; Except the,East 660 feet thereof, and described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said parcel, being also the Northwest corner of the plat of Winsper II, as recorded in Volume 184 of plats at pages 77- 80, records of King County Recorder; thence S01°48'36"W 205.77 feet, along the East line of said parcel, being also the West line of said plat to its' intersection with the center line of South 34th Street, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 121.99 feet, along the center line of South 34th Street,to its' intersection with the center line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S88°24'24"W 25.25 feet to the West line of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat and the True Point of Beginning; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, along the West line of Wells Ave. South; thence Northwesterly 40.77 feet, along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, the central C) point of which bears N88°09'28"W and through a central angle of 93°26'08"; thence S88°24'24"W 483.21 feet, along the South line of proposed street dedication,to the West line of said parcel; thence N01°53'41"E 42.08 feet, along the West line of said parcel, to the North line of proposed street dedication; thence N88°24'24"E 486.17 feet; thence Northeasterly 37.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet and through a central angle of 86°33'52" to the West margin of Wells Ave. South, as shown on said plat; thence S01°50'32"W 46.08 feet, to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 0 ''O4 3 4 4 Co) - w ;;;. ces • ��, , EXPIRES 1211/9 q ry� _ It-t-98 EXHIBIT MAP WINSPER II . S01'48'36"W 205.77' _ 1 I 25' 25' 1 2 I3 3 Ncn 4 SHIN I I U W N in N WELLS AVE. S. N % $01'S0'32"W In 25.25'—� N in Y 46 0�' -46.08'- N II A=86'33'52 t R-25.00' 'I� �A=93'26:08' 5 L=37.77' a R=25.00' I 6 I 7 L-40.77' JL 21' 21' :>1i �j NORTH cn c� gri N I )r PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION • > 0 ''�] U N •` �`' tO '`5 TRACT 'A' st x § W y CV (1) N (.4a N 8 OD •ct-1 �.f/� z r7 vVi • • L, ?. 110 �`S of wA� §0...., 44 • N. 6- — ''' .: ().4\ • ♦ / ) iZ- l i ' 4' 16930 v i oraTS 21'I 21' % iv, ulti) idi EXPIRES: 12-1-1999 ►•♦\♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦_ I Z-1.-98 q 42 08' l' N01'53'41"E • , SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, WALTER STIEGMAN and ILSE STIEGMAN, husband and wife, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint, MALCOLM S. HARRIS as our true and lawful attorney, for us and in our name, place and stead, to take any and all actions and execute any and all documents with respect to the following described real estate owned by us, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: The North 330 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington. (hereinafter "the Property"). Said attorney-in-fact shall have full right and authority to sell the property,to grant,warrant, bargain and deliver deeds, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other documents of conveyance or encumbrance; to retain services necessary for the repair, protection, development or improvement of the property;to initiate, defend and settle any claims arising with respect to the property; and to take any other action which we might take with respect to the Property if we were personally present, all on such terms, as to him shall seem satisfactory, and for us and in our name, and as our act and c2 deed; and to make, sign, seal, execute, deliver and acknowledge good and sufficient deeds and C7 conveyances for the same, either with or without covenants and warranties. 0; u0 GIVING AND GRANTING unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and C� perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, including, without limitation,the creation of escrows and the execution and delivery of escrow instructions,as fully to all intents and purposes as we might or could do if personally present; c We, Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman,hereby ratifying and confirming all that our said attorney, Malcolm S. Harris, shall lawfully do or cause to be done, by virtue of these presents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 2 µ day of October, 1997. Walter Stiegman, Grantulk 4-e/1 Ilse Stiegman, G antor • Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: / r Witness Witness Residing at Stettat , 1414 Residing at 6J4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Walter Stiegman and Ilse Stiegman are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this Z41 d y of October, 1997. O ,re$1 (Print Name) r-2 t.�' �� . Q� R @�c.,�� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of v g810N •o�.*` �A•• •.� Washington, residing at � LQ t �� e NOTARY % My appointment expires '3/ ( °t/c) G A: P�Uc �y�< 99cH 19,Z��'� 02. - 2 - December 14, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 411 Development Services: S 34th Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a dedication of St Right-Of-Way Dedication, additional right-of-way for a 42-foot section of S. 34th St. and Wells Ave. S. to Stiegman Short Plat, SHP-98- comply with City Code short plat requirements(Stiegman, SHP-98-026). 026 — Council concur. Municipal Court: 1999-2000 Municipal Court Division recommended renewal of the current probation Probation Services Renewal, services contract with Wesley E. Etheridge for 1999 and 2000 at annual costs Wesley Etheridge, CAG- of$61,200 and$62,400,respectively. Council concur. Planning: 1998 Zoning Map Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division recommended adoption of the Book and Wall Map Adoption 1998 Zoning Map Book and Zoning Wall Map, incorporating specific rezones already approved in 1998. Council concur. (See page 412 for ordinance.) Planning: Adult Book Store Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division recommended that a public Moratorium Extension hearing be set on 1/11/99 to take testimony on the proposal to extend the moratorium on adult book stores for an additional six months. Council concur. Utility: 1998 Long-Range Wastewater Utility Division submitted 1998 Long-Range Wastewater Wastewater Management Plan Management Plan. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Donald Schumsky,423 Airport Way,Renton, Citizen Comment: Schumsky - 98055,requesting modification of the zoning code to allow card room use at Card Room Restriction Zoning Schumsky's All City Diner on Airport Way. MOVED BY EDWARDS, Change SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. EDNSP: Pavilion Building Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler inquired as to when a report to Council can Improvements be expected regarding the Piazza and Pavilion building project. Mayor Tanner replied that a consulting firm has been contracted to come up with recommended uses for the Pavilion building and a report will be forthcoming in January or February of 1999. Building: Village on Union Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler asked that the Administration provide (Willing Demonstration progress reports(including a resident survey)in early 1999 regarding the Project)/The Orchards Village on Union(Willing Demonstration Project)and The Orchards Demonstration Project Demonstration Project. Planning: Multi-Family MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, Development Design COUNCIL REFER THE GENERAL TOPIC OF DESIGN GUIDELINES AND Guidelines and Standards STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the contract with Finance: Payroll/Human Eden Systems for Y2K Payroll and Human Resources software. The Resources Software, Eden Committee has reviewed the revised issue memorandum dated December 10, Systems, CAG- 1998, regarding: 1)the payroll software contract with Eden Systems; and 2) the option to purchase human resource software from Eden Systems. The Committee recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with Eden Systems to purchase payroll software and implementation/training services at the cost of$99,325,plus tax. The Committee also recommended that if staff concludes that Eden's human resources software program meets the City's needs that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute a contract with Eden to purchase human resource software and implementation/training services at the cost of$33,125, plus tax. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, HEARIN G EXAMINER'S REPORT Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShP1-H October 5, 1998 Page 6 5. The lots will actually contain their requisite square footage unencumbered by access easements which substantially diminish the usable lot size and yards found in many modern short plat lots. DECISION: The proposed short plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the ERC's Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated,prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall establish either a homeowner's association or draft a maintenance agreement that demonstrates to the Development Services Division and the City Attorney that all common improvements of the short plat would be maintained by the property owners. This shall be accomplished prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant/owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant to run with the land precluding the development of Lot 8 and/or Tract A until such time that appropriate access as required by City code is constructed and all required permits and approvals are obtained. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to or with the recording of the short plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to replace the Type I catch basin at the connection point of the storm sewer main from the subject site to the storm system along Talbot Road South,with a Type II catch basin. The replacement would need to occur and be inspected prior to the recording of the short plat. 5. The applicant/owner shall be required to comply with the Board of Public Works condition that if development occurs on Lot 8 or Tract A,that full roadway improvements be required. Furthermore, if development occurs on the southerly property,that full improvements be installed within both South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South. 6. All proposed lots shall provide the code required front and side yards for their respective interior or corner lots. 7. The face of the plat shall require that the wetland buffer on proposed Lots 6 and 7 shall be maintained free of any structure whatsoever,and a fence shall be erected to delinate the edge of the buffer. ORDERED THIS 5th day of October, 1998. FRED J.KA N HEARING E ER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1998 to the parties of record: Jennifer Henning Jim Jaeger Malcolm Harris 1055 S Grady Way 9419 S 204th Place 3210 999 Third Avenue Renton,WA 98055 Kent, WA 98031 Seattle,WA 98104 Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShPl-H October 5, 1998 Page 7 Brad Johnson Phuk Tran Alex Vin 3106 Wells Avenue S 900 South 32nd Street 600 S 32nd Place Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Marilyn Guerra Doug Nelson Libby Ray 931 S 32nd Street 819 S 32nd Street 32525 3rd Place S Renton, W 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Federal Way, WA 98003 Debra Hansen Walter Stiegman Susan Hwang 807 S 32nd Street 2048 Poppywood Ave Shwujen Hwang Renton,WA 98055 Henderson,NV 89012 600 S 32nd Place Renton,WA 98055 Joey Cantor Joe Yanday 10840 SE 184th Lane, #D-104 Ewing&Clark Renton, WA 98055 2110 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m..October 19.1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. October 5, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShP1-H LOCATION: Wells Avenue South and South 32nd Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To subdivide 4.9 acre parcel into eight residential lots SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on September 2, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the September 9, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 9, 1998,at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Short plat map Exhibit No. 4: Shadow plat The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests approval to subdivide an approximate 5 acre parcel into 8 lots for single family homes. There are Category II and III wetlands on the site. There is an existing road extension, South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South, from an adjacent plat connecting to Winsper which joins the two existing developments. At this time the applicant proposes to subdivide a portion of the 5 acres to yield 8 lots,7 of which would be used for the construction of single family homes. The eighth lot would be held as open space until wetland and access Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShP1-H October 5, 1998 Page 2 issues can be solved. There would be a separate tract,Tract A,developed for wetlands preservation. Tract A would be undeveloped until such time that the applicant is able to acquire additional parcels to the south in order to continue platting this site and then to consolidate wetland areas and recreate them on the additional site. Wetlands and coal mines preclude development at this time,but there appears to be a solution in the future if applicant can resolve these issues with the proper authorities. The applicant has shadow platted how both Lot 8 and Tract A could be platted to meet density and access requirements. At the same time there is sufficient area set aside on the adjacent parcel to the south to recreate the wetland areas. The size of the parcels that would be created now are primarily lots between 5,200 square feet and 6,300 square feet. Lot 4,which is at the southeast corner, is 9,540 square feet. Lot 8 is 75,000 square feet in size,and Tract A is about 47,000 square feet in size. The access to this particular plat would be an existing street and the lots would be established on two tiers,one on the east and one on the west side of Wells Avenue S. New Lot 4 would be located on the south side of S. 34th Street. The applicant proposes to dedicate additional right-of-way for future construction of a public street to the west that would eventually tie into Talbot Road. Currently there is a sidewalk built across the extension of S. 34th Street where it intersects with Wells Avenue S. At the point the road is extended,the sidewalk would have to be removed and extended on one or both sides per the City's requirements. A deferral has been obtained to defer construction until such time that development in off-site areas occurs and the need is presented. The proposed right-of-way to the west would cross two wetland areas. The applicant has proposed to recreate the wetlands either on the site or off-site when those future impacts occur. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated and assigned a number of mitigation measures including fire,traffic and parks mitigation fees. There was concern about construction of future roads and utilities for the undeveloped portion of the property. The ERC decided that because there was potential for downstream storm water and erosion impacts,the applicant's project engineer of record would be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to the maintenance schedule. This area is designated Residential- Single Family. The permitted densities are a minimum of 5 units to the acre and a maximum of 8 units to the acre. The Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan allow sensitive areas and unique situations to be factored in and the minimum density can be achieved if the applicant can provide a shadow plat that shows how the property could be further subdivided in the future. The minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet required in this designation is achieved. Applicant has also indicated that the minimum setbacks can be met, including the corner lots. Staff is recommending that Lot 8 not be developed until such time as appropriate access is provided,and all approvals are granted including any environmental review that is needed. The surrounding neighborhoods are changing from vacant and low density residential,agricultural,to single family residential and multi-family residential. This proposal is expected to generate approximately 80 additional vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated there will be approximately 20 students in this subdivision, and Renton School District has indicated they can accommodate them. The applicant is expected to hook up to an existing storm line that is in an easement on the subject property. The storm sewer main constructed as part of the O'Connor plat to the east was not completed in the manner requested by the City. Since the same storm sewer main would be utilized by this short plat, it would need to be corrected prior to recording of this short plat. The City has notified the developer of the O'Connor plat that there is a deficiency and the warranty bond will not be released until the situation is corrected. The specific Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShPl-H October 5, 1998 Page 3 problem is an undersized structure located at the connection point from the new storm sewer main running west from O'Connor and the storm system that is on the east side of Talbot Road S. At the southern portion of proposed Lots 6 and 7,there is a small wetland buffer area(5 feet at its widest point) crossing onto these lots. Staff is requesting that until such time as the wetlands are relocated,they have to be delineated with a split rail fence or some sort of native growth easement to keep the homeowners from intruding into the wetland buffer area. Staff is recommending approval of the short plat, subject to the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures; (2)establishing a homeowners association or to have a maintenance agreement established for all properties in order to maintain all common improvements of the short plat; (3)prohibiting development of either Lot 8 or Tract A until such time as appropriate access is demonstrated and that all required permits and approvals, including environmental review,are obtained. This would probably be by a restrictive covenant to be recorded either on the face of the plat or recorded separately at the same time the short plat is recorded; (4)storm sewer problem rectified that exists from O'Connor down to Talbot that this system would be tying into;(5)compliance with the Board of Public Works condition that any development occurring on Lot 8 or Tract A would trigger full roadway improvements;(6)to delineate the wetland buffer area across Lots 6 and 7 such that the property owners would not be able to intrude into this area with their landscaping until such time that the wetlands are recreated in another area,or until such time that the applicant can recreate those on site as part of this development. Malcolm Harris, 3210 999 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104,attorney for the owners herein, concurred with the staff report and its mitigation measures and conditions. James Jaeger,9419 S 204th Place,Kent, Washington 98031,applicant engineer herein,described the relationship of Tract A and Lot 8 and their history. Regarding the storm water issue,this relates to downstream off-site storm water where it makes a turn coming down the hill to Talbot Road and then south along Talbot Road. This system was installed per the approved plans. After the system was in operation,the City noticed some problems where it makes that turn and water was coming out of the top of the grate. Applicant is requesting that adjustments will be made to the system to the satisfaction of the City,without having to meet specific requirements. Regarding a homeowners association,applicant would request that this short plat be allowed to join the existing homeowners association for Winsper II,the O'Connor plat,rather than creating a separate homeowners association. There was discussion regarding requirements for each plat and the separation of each. It was noted that the owner of the O'Connor plat has entered into an agreement to purchase Lots 1 through 7,but Mr. Stiegman would retain Tract A and Lot 8. Mr. Harris suggested that covenants and restrictions would be appropriate instead of a homeowners association, and that the applicant would work with the City to resolve the matter. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:35 a.m. Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShP1-H October 5, 1998 Page 4 FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS& DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Jim Jaeger,filed a request for approval of a 8-lot short plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on what would be the 3200 block of Wells Avenue S. The site is located on the west side of Wells(as extended)and immediately west of S 34th Street. 6. The subject site is zoned R-8(Single Family Residential; 8 dwelling units per acre). 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The subject site was annexed with the adoption of Ordinance 4476 enacted in October 1994. 9. The subject site is an approximately 4.99 acre rectangular parcel. The subject site is approximately 330 feet wide(north to south)by approximately 657 feet long. 10. The site slopes downward from east to west from approximately 240 feet to 220 feet. The lower western portion,approximately two-thirds of the site, is dominated by two wetland areas. The northern wetland, Wetland B, is located in the center of the site and is approximately 16,459 square feet in size. This is generally a Category III wetland and it will require a 25 foot buffer. The southerly wetland, Wetland A, straddles the south property line. It totals approximately 51,980 square feet on both its on- site and off-site coverage. This is a Category II wetland and it will require a 50 buffer. 11. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 9(nine)parcels,which would include 8(eight)lots and 1 (one)tract. Seven(7)of the lots would be between 5,757 square feet and 9,540 square feet. The eighth lot would be 75,295 square feet. Finally,the tract,Tract A,would be 47,164 square feet. 12. The two larger parcels,Lot 8 and Tract A are designed to encompass the two wetlands. These properties would not be developed until the wetland areas can be developed appropriately by relocation of the wetlands. 13. The applicant proposes dedicating right-of-way to allow the eastward extension of S. 34th Street through the site, although this would not occur until the wetlands have been appropriately dealt with by the applicant. There would also be a southerly leg of right-of-way at the west end of the parcel. Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShP1-H October 5, 1998 Page 5 14. The Board of Public Works approved a deferral for street improvements for the new streets while Proposed Lot 8 and Tract A remain undeveloped. 15. It is not clear why the applicant created both a large "lot"and a large "tract" as opposed to two lots or two tracts. In any event,due to the requirements to meet a minimum density,the applicant has demonstrated with a shadow plat that the parcel, if the wetland issues are resolved, can be appropriately divided. 16. Water and sewer utilities for property in this area are provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 17. Storm water will be conveyed to a City system. Unfortunately,a catch basin needed by this site does not meet City standards. It was installed for another plat but will need to be corrected in order to provide proper storm water capacity and handling for the subject site. 18. Proposed Lots 1 through 4 run north to south along the east side of Wells Avenue S. Proposed Lots 5 through 7 run north to south along the west side of Wells. Proposed Lot 8 and Proposed Tract A are long,east-west oriented lots that run along the north and south property lines respectively. 19. Proposed Lots 6 and 7 will be located within the wetland buffer areas for the Category II wetland that extends from Tract A to Proposed Lot 8. The buffer will have to be respected. 20. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 79.6 vehicle traffic trips per day. 21. Students generated by the development of the subject site will attend Renton School District schools. Assignments are made on a space available basis. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed short plat generally appears to serve the public use and interest. The division provides additional lots for housing opportunities in an area capable of supporting additional development, subject to the conditions denoted below. 2. In general the proposed lots meet the size requirements of the Zoning Code with most of the lots in the 5,000 square foot to just over 6,000 square foot range. Two proposed parcels,Tract A and Proposed Lot 8,will be exceptionally large due to the existence of wetlands. The applicant has submitted a shadow plat, a device which shows the site can meet the minimum density required for the amount of acreage found in the subject site. If the applicant can find a way to work around the wetland issues, further division will permit the applicant to meet the underlying density requirements of the City. 3. While the entire short plat consists of substantial acreage,the actual seven-lot plat,the lots that will actually be developed with housing at this time,will not tax the underlying infrastructure of either the City or the Soos Creek Utility District. As already noted,a storm sewer catch basin will need to be appropriately resized in accordance with City standards before development of the site can proceed. 4. The proposed lots are essentially rectangular,are served by actual,direct access to a public right-of- way(becoming a rarity in short plats)and laid out in a rectilinear fashion on a through street system. Jim Jaeger Stiegman Short Plat File No.: LUA-98-026,ShPl-H October 5, 1998 Page 8 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ‘ . • . • . . ' .—___ • . __. .. • • _. 7,::. _-:.e)1-• — •,kbyan,,..--- :-----:--'.---- --e•-•:,,,,:- .:11--. ...-- — - ''.f •"ia I IL..';E TO- .c. ,-I. s•• . *8).. Et .tp) ... /Ii.---- i ; • 7 • ' 4% -•14-!..••i :4.1.1 1 feLliti ill —.:A 1,., 4 ,•1/ ......, . SI° . , ' i'-'-' ••• . • .- till 7...1T7--,-.7. i .. • ifr X.. . I• .0. , ..•o ...8 i ,, ,...1 • o:4 .6;- .,t. RI. ,,Ito.i,*i•SrAiiiiivaik , . i 1 li„I:01p ,.. ..,•—L-......6 1•:- 't ,,—.; ''• - :.:;-1077:7* .t.\ l' 0 o 0 7:0 .A.a •-& -- • ..-- •'""t''' .• gAlili. kii Arrilibi vii --":;-:.4._!,, -,—- _,- 'sVN. I, :-.a:i:it.:..a..'0: • ' ......; e- • ' I • • ;43 .;-. I.1‘0%.... . •• .-''' •••• " "" * le' ; --9 •4 i' . -% -1‘. 'Os';.k -- ... AN .1t .a•;•: • . L.; . • - -k n. -.•.—' ;',. ch..,i - '4,,1_•-t ,6. .),0 • •:::1?".-.:4:. r a,1 41 t"'• ". i •:. ...No•- ....;kir: ..... • ., ••••• •IE ELHON 1. ' " '... ..`i'l.'i rist::?ji.,-Z-'5',, 7'44* . •or,.'* $,.! 0 • n ••.A *-0,c4.:,,,..,41%; '.1 '.:••/.....N 4 : • ...:" :..tlielpi, s.%. . a:- .- •. -- ki,, •48.'5.:: : •••, ....1.:::„.A • ' • i-- - (431\ A....a.,\ -•:It • ; p, -\,, • - ''''... "41 :- --.1 7. ".' :Jar ,tn.'09 • • ..• . • .' 1 .. % ..a. '....lit.4)1Z-s. ' t. - a. '''i ..C• ?"---. : _ _. • ••------ SITE DATA: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Total Property Area: 4.99 acres The north 330 feet of the south I/2 of the northwest I/4 of the southwest Number of Lots: 8 1/4 of Section 29.Township 23 N..Range 5 E..W.M..EXCEPT the east 660 City of Renton Zoning: R-8 18 lots per acre( Smallest Lot: 5,757 SF feet thereof. Area in Right-of-Way: 19.536 SF Average Lot Size: 6.410 SF(not include.lot 8( N .... ;._e ''',• d Ili I I I I I Q g'J PI1 .._.. I I I < : . r e i .n I I .. �II I ._ I ?4 24lI: � 4` N ' I I H ' 1L I L.S7. la' I iL 5Ot' ad 43"I E. I J cIN Ik ' _ _ I:: I __ 410.14. \ r JOa_°� ...6.. u r w 97.0_ ___ 15 I - ' � ' oI 1 �1 a p 9 _ o 7 I / ' _-��� lcOOD$F ? 'X. 582o SF N 1 \ T Io �m -- 11 1 T 1 J : a a 1 • ` 100.0—- 1. —HH M\ r wenpLm I i I I l0334 SF. I 5757 SF S _ AN - { -\ y i i F I R ,� �mlK I m/ \ ft.,45.1 SF i I I — 1 1 s __\,.., ll ��_ yQQy1 3 Z, ice' >w.lCR r WU`� I. I In C. S .. c_ I 7 ss �E umikage _ `z / uca I • .. S• 1 . -- 1 L� J / wPTuwD 1 lei" -i——72.o'.- __ ____.tea_-.__ .'s ' 1 . , I \ * e i:`e.E 4. R .. r�D r w. 1.'"'..... . I�/, eo so.BUFFER \ i ,. to P.IX�e:R TT�C� A �. n ISi s WCR1WItiK \ ^� „ ui / �\ I.^ ^ 95go SF �- T� --,— r- -r—r `, �n9'ars°- °t€ �Q �wrnr...10 ,A' \\ 1 54,900 V' \ g I_ 411111k �` N of 2n' 43 W 1n50.00' II - • -� 7----'----- r V A11ki s. 1 , _/ �- i` J 1 DAIE.: SPT. 3o, 11g7 2o THOMAS LAND SURVEYING JAEGER ENGINEERING E SH ET l"' ao' STIEGMAN 8 LOT SHORT PLAT E 11309 48TH STREET EASE o zo 4o eo Fr' EDGEWOOD, WA 98372 9419 S.204 P(Kent,Wa.98031 DAnwr-'' J.J.J. 4 PHONE 883-2321 (206) 850-0934 DeNc44: .1.J..1. S. 35 ST & S. WELLS ST SALE, I' • 40' JOB! OF 1 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 3h1) day of Sgrfiehnb r , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing P po r-A -o -ikc i easy ts) GXAYN l vie ir' documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing G.Mr\es Z3&. e - &Y toter S tbesvvuv\ mud :l►nso h Phu,k -T►i A\ex mcL iy\ errru_ rNelsm („20i, I 4e 1�:b t B c h cavctor nwe en S‘kS,ot,v\ 4w4%.v f (Signature of Sender) Sa ave, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ✓uT. - eQ��- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for 'the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dater: / r —77)CcA� a' n n 6.e..417 Notary Public I' and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment ex Project Name: ‘forraxk S41ar t Plat Project Number: LUAr e 02/0� sietp NOTAR .DOC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Significance for the following project under newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months the authority of the Renton Municipal prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language Code. gSTEIGMAN SHORT PLAT/ continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Environmental review to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight residential lots and a State of Washington for King County. separate tract for wetlands. Location:Wells The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Ave.South,South of So.32nd Street. a- Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Appeals bef the environmental of dorerfore (andPP g Y lion must filed in writing on or before during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a I 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Steigman Short Plat Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of as published on: 8/10/98 Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$49.37 process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)235-2501. Legal Number 5048 7----- ) _ A Public Hearing will be held by the / Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South 1 1 /;?0---- Z� �.�.: Grady Way, on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Short Plat. If the (eaiClerk, Sou County Journal Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- c lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to Subscribed and sworn before me on this d y of At 1...P1 , 19 t attend the public hearing. Published in the South County Journal �^ August 10, 1998.5048 r' I f \ 1 N".••' ' ', •• •• .''•.-%e'er., Notary Public of the State of Washington �,�: ':••1%-• residing in Renton c_ - _„ %.0-- King County, Washington City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works h FARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: P;rblic Hearing Date: September 8, 1998 Project Name: Stiegman Short Plat Applicant/ Jim Jaeger Address: 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 Owner/ Walter Stiegman Address: 2048 Poppywood Avenue Henderson, NV 89012 File Number: LUA-098-026, SHPL-H, Project Manager: Jennifer Henning ECF Project Description: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and Ill wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. Project Location: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street.'- - ?', ) 'I':: ''i. 4Z' 7,WPOi"-"\ '' •-• t140921H_. , ___... , ......_ ,,,.,,,ii „It s , ..,..,:.\: ).,i,---- .`j.t.SNit : 'f-: dt,..;417-0-!:-; fi li 44 . :..gip 9 :o- 6 c,:41,`R iliii4 Pit" . ..w xseAMwas I Ei • — ! Q f • ,I ae:.vr .. o- r ` o . fill - :.„..1 - F- �ll .---F9 _ 33 .-.`.?."1-7.._: " i " : ` . - ---. ,-a 6 � _ . City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 2 of 9 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Walter Stiegman 2048 Poppywood Avenue Henderson, NV 89012 2. Zoning Designation: Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan: Residential Single Family (RSF) Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use: vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: single family residential neighborhoods East: single family residential neighborhoods South: vacant, wetlands, existing residential West: vacant, wetlands, residential 6. Access: via South j 7. Site Area: 4.99 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: N/A Total Building Area: N/A C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 4476 10/17/94 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning Code 4404 6/7/93 Talbot Trunk Variance LUA-96-116,V 11/96 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: The property is within the boundaries of the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District and would be served by the Soos Creek District. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension located in Wells Avenue South. HEXRPT.DOG City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 3 of 9 Sewer: The property is within the boundaries of the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District and would be served by the Soos Creek District. Surface Water/Storm Water: The proposal would hook-up to an existing storm sewer line on the adjacent O'Connor plat. 2. Fire Protection: Provided City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: King County/Metro Transit does not serve the site directly, however, transit service is available on SE Carr Road and Talbot Road South 4. Schools: Students would attend Talbot Hill Elementary, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton or Lindbergh High School 5. Recreation: Lower Talbot Park, Thomas Teasdale Park, and Talbot Reservoir Park are located within approximately 1 mile of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-8 (Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre) 2. Section 9-12, Subdivision Regulations 3. Section 4-34, Street Improvements 4. Section 4-32, Wetlands Management F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan 2. Supporting Policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing Element: Policy H-4: Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity. Policy H-10: Encourage small lot single family development. Land Use Element: Residential Single Family Policy LU-34: Net development densities of 8 dwelling units per acre should be allowed in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. Policy LU-35: A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single family residential neighborhoods. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 4 of 9 Residential Street: Objective LU-M: Reduce congestion on arterials and provide more linkages within and between neighborhoods by developing a system of residential streets which serves both vehicles and pedestrians and creates a continuous, efficient, interconnected network of roads and pathways throughout the City. Policy LU-70: Streets, sidewalks, pedestrian or bike paths in a neighborhood development should be arranged as an interconnecting network. Cul-de-sacs should be limited to areas where natural barriers occur. Grid pattern streets are preferable to connect adjacent and future development. Minimum Density: Policy LU-23: New development within all residential designations should achieve a minimum density. The minimum density may be adjusted to reflect constraints on a site. Policy H-14: Minimum density requirements shall be established in all zones which allow residential development to ensure adequate capacity for growth and create greater efficiency in the provision of urban services. Policy H-16: Minimum density requirements should be based on net density and should exclude portions of the site constrained by sensitive areas, dedicated public or private rights-of-way and public facility requirements. Policy H-16: Minimum density requirements should be satisfied through the average net density of the project. Minimum density requirements should not be required of individual portions or lots within the project. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. The size of the proposed parcels would be as follows: Lot 1- 5,820 s.f. Lot 2- 5,280 s.f., Lot 3- 5,757 s.f. Lot 4- 9,540 s.f. Lot 5- 6,000 s.f. Lot 6- 6,000 s.f. Lot 7 -6,336 s.f. Lot 8 - 75,295 s.f. Proposed Tract A on the south portion of the plat would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and Ill wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from existing streets, Wells Avenue South, and South 34th Street. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur.. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner STIEG 1AN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PUBLI HEARING DATE. September 8, 1998 Page 5 of 9 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on August 4, 1998 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee issued the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with five (5) mitigation measures. The measures are listed below and compliance is discussed following each measure. I. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. The applicant intends to comply with this measure. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 for each new single family residential dwelling unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. The applicant intends to comply with this measure. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $488 per single family residential lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. The applicant intends to comply with this measure. 4. In order to mitigate potential construction impacts associated with future road and utility construction, the applicant shall be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the potential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant's project engineer of record will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The applicant intends to comply with this measure. 5. Unless a deferral/waiver is granted for the construction of the proposed east/west street, then separate environmental review shall be required. Separate environmental review shall consider the impacts of road construction, development of proposed Lot No. 8, Tract A, and any impacts to on-site wetlands. The City's Board of Public Works granted a deferral for the off-site improvements along the extension of South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South, between proposed Tract A and proposed Lot 8. The Board conditioned the approval such that if development occurs on Lot 8 or Tract A, full roadway improvements will be required. In addition, if development occurs on the southerly property, full improvements must be installed on both South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South. HEXRPT.DOC Cit) of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner STAEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PU 3LIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 6 of 9 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SHORT PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential - Single Family in that residential lots for single family development would be created. Each of the lots would meet the minimum size of 4,500 square feet provided for by the policies. However, the short plat would result in a net density of 1.06 dwelling units per acre. While the short plat proposal is less than the minimum density of 5.0 du/ac, the site is constrained by wetlands and neither buildable lots or access could be developed to the west portion of the site without impacting wetland areas. The applicant has submitted a shadow plat illustrating how future subdivision on the parcel could occur, subject to wetland replacement/ re-creation requirements of the Wetlands Ordinance. The proposal has been accomplished in such a way as to not preclude future subdivision of the parcels consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The proposal site is designated R-8 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for future construction of up to 8 new dwelling units. However, access to proposed Lot No. 8 is not possible under this proposal without impacting site wetland areas. The applicant's proposal would result in the construction of, at most, 7 dwelling units in the near future. Minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 Zone is 4,500 s.f. The proposed short plat would provide 7 lots ranging in size from 5,757 s.f. to 9,540 s.f. Proposed Lot No. 8 would be 75,295 s.f. in size, and a separate tract, Tract A, would be 47,164 s.f. in size. The size of Lot Nos. 1 through 7 are compatible with other existing lots in the adjoining O'Connor(Winsper 2 or Winsper View) plat and the Winsper development. Minimum density in the R-8 Zone is 5.0 dwelling units per acre, and the maximum density is 8. 0 dwelling units per acre. The R-8 Zone permits phasing, shadow plating or land reserves to be used to satisfy the minimum density requirements if the applicant can demonstrate that these techniques would allow for the eventual satisfaction of minimum density requirements through future development. The applicant must demonstrate that the current development would not preclude the provision of adequate access and infrastructure to future development. Proposed Lot No. 8 and Tract A are constrained by wetlands. The applicant has reserved Tract A and Lot 8 for future subdivision to satisfy density requirements. Access to the future parcels would be provided via a public street system to the west that would be extended at the time development occurs. An existing utility easement and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District utilities have been extended through the site in a utility easement in the same location as the future public street. The applicant has proposed to dedicate the streets that would be extended in the future. The Board of Public Works on August 19, 1998 granted a deferral of future street improvements for South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South subject to the condition that if development occurs on Lot 8 or Tract A, then full roadway improvements would be required. In addition, the I IEXRPT.DOC Cit.,•of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ST'EGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PL BLIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 7 of 9 Environmental Review Committee conditioned future development such that future subdivision or development of access to future lots would be subject to separate environmental review. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private access easement street per the requirements of the Street Improvement Ordinance (Code Section 4-34). The proposed parcels would have lot lines that are at right angles to the street. Each lot would have access to a public street, Wells Avenue South or South 34th Street, with the exception of Lot No. 8, which would not have access until such time that South 34th Street is extended. Staff will recommend that the applicant/owner not be allowed to develop Lot No. 8 until such time that appropriate access is provided and approvals are granted. Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. Proposed Lots 1 through 7 would meet the City's requirements for lot size, width, depth, and would have sufficient area for the development of homes while meeting the applicable setbacks. Setbacks for interior residential lots (Lots 1, 2, ,5, and 6) are 20 feet for the front yard (15 feet for residence and 20 feet for garages accessing from the front), 20 feet for the rear yard, and 5 feet for the side yards. Corner lots (Lots 3, 4 and 8) must have a 15-foot sideyard setback. Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. South Wells Street and South 34th Street serving proposed Lots 1 through 7 were constructed as part of the O'Connor Preliminary Plat. The existing streets serving the proposal comply with the radius requirement. d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Existing access to the proposal exists on South Wells Streets and an extension of South 34th Street from O'Connor plat to the Stiegman site. Lot 8 would not have adequate access and would not be permitted to be developed until appropriate access is demonstrated and all applicable City reviews and approvals have been granted. The proposal is anticipated to generate up to 79.6 new average weekday trips. The proposal is subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. Topography: Seven of the eight parcels proposed are not constrained by topography. A building pad could be located on Lot 8 but would lack appropriate access at this time. Wetlands also constrain the western portion of the site, and development of that portion of the property is not proposed at this time. Relationship to Existing Uses: The surrounding area has been developing from vacant and low density residential to single family residential neighborhoods. The proposed short plat is compatible with the existing and future development envisioned in the area. I IEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner STIt GMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PUE LIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 8 of 9 e) Availability and Impact on Public Services(Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code required improvements and fees. Recreation: Several City of Renton park facilities are located within one mile of the proposal. Schools: The Renton School District has responded to staff's inquiry regarding school capacity. Children living in the Stiegman Short Plat would attend Talbot Hill Elementary School, Dimmitt Middle School, and Renton or Lindbergh High School. During the 1998/99 school year, high school students grades 9 - 11 would attend Renton High School, and 12th grade students would attend Lindbergh High. During the school year 1999/2000 and beyond high school students would attend Renton High Storm Water: The applicant has proposed to hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on the subject property. It has been brought to attention of the Plan Review Section by the City's Maintenance Division that the storm sewer main constructed as part of the O'Connor Plat was not completed in the manner requested by the City. Since this same storm sewer main will be utilized by the Stiegman Short Plat development, it would need to be corrected prior to recording of the Stiegman Short Plat. The Plan Review Section has notified the developer of the O'Connor Plat of the deficiency, and will not release their warranty bond until the situation is corrected. The specific problem is an undersized structure installed at the connection point from the new storm sewer main running westerly from the O'Connor development and the storm system along the east side of Talbot Road South. A Type I catch basin structure was used, instead of the requested Type II catch basin. The Type II catch basin is a 48" structure with a deeper sump and a solid lid to prevent the surcharging of flow from the rim of the structure during storm events. The Type I catch is very shallow. With the steep slope of the offsite storm system that connects to the Type I catch basin, there is not enough room in the structure to dissipate the energy. Staff will recommend as a condition of short plat approval that the Type I catch basin at the connection point of the storm sewer main from the site with the storm system along Talbot Road South be replaced with a Type II catch basin prior to recording of the short plat. This correction is being requested of the developer for the O'Connor Plat, but the timing of this work is not certain at this time. Without this correction, the storm sewer main which will serve the Stiegman Short Plat is not adequate for additional development, including the additional lots proposed with this particular plat. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Water and sanitary sewer are being provide by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The improvements were previously installed in an easement through the property. I IEXRPT.DOC City 3f Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner STIE GMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026, SHPL-A, ECF PUE LIC HEARING DATE: September 8, 1998 Page 9 of 9 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Stiegman Short Plat, Project File No. LUA-98-026, SHPL-H, ECF, subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee's August 4, 1998 Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated, prior to the recording of the short plat. (2) Homeowner's Association/Maintenance Agreement: The applicant shall establish either a homeowner's association or draft a maintenance agreement that demonstrates to the Development Services Division and the City Attorney that all common improvements of the short plat would be maintained by the property owners. This shall be accomplished prior to the recording of the short plat. (3) Prohibition of Development of Lot 8: The applicant/owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant to run with the land precluding the development of Lot No. 8 and/or Tract A until such time that appropriate access as required by City Code is constructed and all required permits and approvals are obtained. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to or with the recording of the short plat. (4) Installation of Appropriate Stormwater System: The applicant shall be required to replace the Type I catch basin, at the connection point of the storm sewer main from the subject site to the storm system along Talbot Road South, with a Type II catch basin. The replacement would need occur and be inspected prior to the recording of the short plat. (5) Compliance with Board of Public Works Condition:. The applicant/owner shall be required to comply with the Board of Public Works condition that if development occur on Lot 8 or Tract A, that full roadway improvements be required. Furthermore, if development occurs on the southerly property, that full improvements be installed within both South 34th street and Wells Avenue South. I IEXRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757- 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 400-M4ll , Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: August 10, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: August 04, 1998 SIGNATURES: 4/ /4.,,,s, g Zimmerman, Administrator DATE partment of Planning/Building/Public Works Qom_ �� ri ;1i She herd'"Admin strator DATE P C mmunity Se ices i 71)i, OC— 4/—Yi- / Lee eeler,Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 for each new single family residential dwelling unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to$488 per single family residential lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. In order to mitigate potential construction impacts associated with future road and utility construction,the applicant shall be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the potential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant's project engineer of record will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. Unless a deferral/waiver is granted for the construction of the proposed east/west street, then separate environmental review shall be required. Separate environmental review shall consider the impacts of road construction, development of proposed Lot No. 8, Tract A, and any impacts to on-site wetlands. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels(new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review-Transportation 1. Wells Ave South has been improved with full street improvements from South 34th Street to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in the adjacent Winsper development to the north. The Wells Ave. South right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of South 34th Street. South 34th Street is also fully improved from Wells Ave. South to the west property line of the short plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II (also known as Winsper View or O'Connor Plat). 2. Per the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line? As shown on the revised short plat submittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend from South 34th Street to the southwest corner of the subject property,with a minimum right-of-way width of 42 feet. This right- of-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements constructed for the Winsper II (O'Connor) plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specifically,this means extension of Wells Ave. South to the south property line, and extension of South 34th Street to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. • Stiegman Short Plat LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 of 3 4. A deferral from Board of Public Works will be required to defer the improvement of the rest of South 34th Street to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that development on Tract A and Lot 8 would be prohibited until such time as the street improvements are completed. Plan Review-Water 5. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension in Wells Ave South. A fire hydrant and all meters boxes to serve the proposed homesites are installed. 6. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$850 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 7. Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by Soos Creek Public Utilities. An extension in Wells Avenue South has been provided for this short plat. 8. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate determined by Soos Creek Public Utilities. A letter of availability shall be required prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review-Stormwater 9. A proposed storm system hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on this property has been constructed. The system and report conform to the standards set in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There are existing wetlands on the site. 10. The System Development Charge shall be at the rate of$385 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review-General 11. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 12. A construction permit is required for any additional work in dedicated right of way. If no further work is required for this short plat, no construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. 13. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 14. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. St egman Short Plat • LUA-9 8-026,S H P L-H,E C F Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 3 of 3 lb. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. F re Prevention 115. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1 500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 17. A Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. The fee is due prior b l recording oft the short plat. F arks 18. A Parks Mitigation Fee is required for the new single family residential lots. The fee is $530.76 and i due prior to the recording of the short plat. Property Services 9. Comments from Property Services will be forwarded to the applicant under separate cover. 2enton School District ?0. Students residing the in Stiegman Short Plat would attend Talbot Hill Elementary School, Dimmitt vliddle School and Renton or Lindbergh High School. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 TO. JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DRAINAGE SYSTEM DEFICIENCY It has been brought to my attention by our Maintenance Division that the storm sewer main constructed as part of the O'Connor Plat was not completed in the manner requested by the City. This same storm sewer main will be utilized by the Stiegman Short Plat development, and should be corrected prior to recording of the Stiegman Short Plat. We are sending notice to the developer of the O'Connor Plat of the deficiency, and will not release their warranty bond until the situation is corrected. The specific problem is an undersized structure installed at the connection point from the new storm sewer main running westerly from the O'Connor development and the storm system along the east side of Talbot Road South. A Type I catch basin structure was used, instead of the requested Type II catch basin. The Type II catch basin is a 48" structure with a deeper sump and a solid lid to prevent the surcharging of flow from the rim of the structure during storm events. The Type I catch is very shallow. With the steep slope of the offsite storm system that connects to the Type I catch basin, there is not enough room in the structure to dissipate the energy. We are requesting that the staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner include the following condition: • The Type I catch basin at the connection point of the storm sewer main from the site with the storm system along Talbot Road South must be replaced with a Type II catch basin prior to recording of the short plat. This correction is being requested of the developer for the O'Connor Plat, but the timing of this work is not certain at this time. Without this correction, the storm sewer main which will serve the Stiegman Short Plat is not adequate for additional development, including the additional lots proposed with this particular plat. cc: John Thompson Ron Straka CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 29, 1998 TO: JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT REVIEW We have reviewed the revised submittal information for the Stiegman Short Plat and have the following comments: The review comments listed in the March 18, 1998 memo by Kayren Kittrick (copy attached) are still applicable for sewer, water and surface water issues. The plans have been revised in response to our earlier listed concerns with the street improvements shown for the short plat. Transportation (revised) 1. Wells Ave S has been improved with full street improvements from S 34th St to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in Winsper. The Wells Av. S right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of S 34th St. S 34th St is also fully improved from Wells Av. S to the west property line of the short plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II. 2. Per the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line." As shown on the revised short plat submittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend S 34th St to the southwest corner of the subject property, with a minimum right-of- way width of 42 feet. This right-of-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements constructed for the Winsper II plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in S 34th St and Wells Av. S adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specifically, this means extension of Wells Av. S to the south property line, and extension of S 34th St to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. JULY 27, 1998 PAGE 2 4. A deferral from Board of Public Works will be required for the improvement of the rest of S 34th St to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that covenants will be required requiring participation in the cost of future development of the street by the individual lots of the short plat, and a prohibition of development on Tract A and Lot 8 until such time as the street improvements are completed. cc: Kayren Kittrick CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: March 18, 1998 To: Jennifer Henning From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: Stiegman Short Plat LUA-98-026, SHPL-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension in Wells Ave South. A fire hydrant and all meters boxes to serve the proposed homesites are installed. SEWER - Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by Soos Creek Public Utilities. An extension in Wells Avenue South has been provided for this short plat. STORM - A proposed storm system hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on this property has been constructed. The system and report conform to the standards set in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There are existing wetlands on the site. STREETS - Sidewalks, curb, gutter, streetlighting and pavement have been constructed to City of Renton standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $850 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate determined by Soos Creek Public Utilities. A letter of availability shall be required prior to recording of the short plat. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the rate of $385 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed at a single family rate of 9.55 trips per homesite. Total fee for 8 lots is $5,730. 2. Dedication of additional right-of-way and, possibly, street improvements to provide future access to the southern and western edges of the short plat is required. The dedications are critical to develop an alternate access to Talbot Road for the neighborhood. Waivers and/or modifications can be requested for the street improvements for the proposed dedications through the Board of Public Works. STIEGF.DOC PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for any additional work in dedicated right of way. If no further work is required for this short plat, no construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. 3. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. C Neil Watts STIEGF.DOC 3 ' 1 • • c3(., + I ..................... Y.P17 y 0:117: C»�»>.A!.«rn.�*.,a,-'».w,�+.0 F�.�v =rw-.�e.,.id"de..».,vie„''''+--.+Y..»+..sc2+,.�.-.... Tr Project Name StRimc h Sl4o✓t Plurt Project Address u)c l I S Au S d 5 304 1 It Contact Person Jam 'Juec1av Address Phone Number 253 -• Da 3L • Permit Number LAM - q -O Z (o Project Description tot StIOVt P/aX Land Use ype: Method of Calculation: Residential C"1TE Trip Generation Manual ( Tt ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study 5►Nq(c TurN1/!f C210 ❑ Non-retail 0 Other pc Z 5 4 • = q,65 ici,1 /0/ Calculation: 0\itt Lt.e,40 kith/ tries (q.55) = 7(, 4 t Y1Ps 001 )($75 ) _ 5730, o° • Transportation Mitigation Fee: 5730. o/ 0/ Calculated by: AV Wa Date: 3/5 �R$ Account Number: io5. 5RR• 31gW- 70. 00. Date of Payment �. O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 22, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat, S 32nd nd S . & Wells Av. S Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Revised City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q/ ,,� COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPLL--H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet sf/W /"LOC-e7,211 ad 7467& B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS tea, ,et9 ��-� . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7-7--wee avix M % 4- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. a 7/22/? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1.63 SITE DATA: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Total Property Area: 4.99 acres The north 330 feet of the south 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest Number of Lots: 8 1/4 of Section 29.Township 23 N..Range 5 E..W.M..EXCEPT the east 660 City of Renton Zoning: R-8(8 lots Per acre( feet thereof. Smallest Lot: 5.757 SF Area in Right-of-Way: 19.536 SF Average Lot Size: 6.4to SF(not include.lot 8) InN I TF', v II P. ,to I Fi rn 1 67 I I '� I 3' r P4 2A I.> eu nl I At I I ' I ' M 1 I J� I f/57. I4' I I L- 5 OI' 20 43•• E- I .Ii o I 1 vir '.( u,0 71 c I 5 I $ i. I\ C J i yi \\ ,/� - I lnoao$F I g %re. I \5850 SF I a / �� ` / F - 1 A \ 4 8 / �„ 'n -- , 1 - 4 ; 1 sI s c. I 2 I 1 I ,1 +P-F."�,C`�; l \\ _ _- \ I L COOCO}F. I $ 0 5F I Z ,... . .s...,,, \ Si t i 1 I I �L : fi l �4\ r W cntanp ,6 r 1ill 1 6!336 SF I I S` 1 j i / I I I 1FIK '3757 5F I r `(' t 1 y m II.,4s9 SF/ y / I __ ' I ¢R( a i�I i 75.,.E -4.. _ — 3 - it /) �-L� t a •G .. ,..:.':. • Y/ �/ ��/ , rwrreR W \ , _all._ - ■lever S. 54TM~'� < r—9"-- , —1-- I.iiiimmar4,- _.. __________,,,, 21 / / dkitt voLetuwC, 1 el -.4,.‘,..-- -7271 --- I • 3.4z ATes Iut®.y,, 50'TIP.ea+FFSR I I i 3 'wwr+e " ( T12Acr R `` 11 I EYLTIN. 1-„, 954 SF u Imo- - r r .W�,- -.�vrvso .- "'_". \ \ Wennup 'P1' ` R.0 . . " A111111111111, ---}-,�` y1�y y� �- � I'y_ 43 W i���. -- I DATE: SEPr. 50, 1941 4 T130MAS LAND SURVEYING JAEGER ENGINEERING "' I'• 40' STIEGMAN 8 LOT SHORT PLAT SHEET 11309 48TH STREET EAST DAWN: J.J.J. EDGEWOOD, WA 98372 9419 S.204 PI.Kent,Wa.98031 .t _z1 1 PHONE 863-2321 (206) 850-0934 ,DESIr3N: .J.J.J. S. 35 ST 8 S. WELLS ST 1 SCALE• i' . 40' -SOB! OF 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 TO: JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DRAINAGE SYSTEM DEFICIENCY It has been brought to my attention by our Maintenance Division that the storm sewer main constructed as part of the O'Connor Plat was not completed in the manner requested by the City. This same storm sewer main will be utilized by the Stiegman Short Plat development, and should be corrected prior to recording of the Stiegman Short Plat. We are sending notice to the developer of the O'Connor Plat of the deficiency, and will not release their warranty bond until the situation is corrected. The specific problem is an undersized structure installed at the connection point from the new storm sewer main running westerly from the O'Connor development and the storm system along the east side of Talbot Road South. A Type I catch basin structure was used, instead of the requested Type II catch basin. The Type II catch basin is a 48" structure with a deeper sump and a solid lid to prevent the surcharging of flow from the rim of the structure during storm events. The Type I catch is very shallow. With the steep slope of the offsite storm system that connects to the Type I catch basin, there is not enough room in the structure to dissipate the energy. We are requesting that the staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner include the following condition: • The Type I catch basin at the connection point of the storm sewer main from the site with the storm system along Talbot Road South must be replaced with a Type II catch basin prior to recording of the short plat. This correction is being requested of the developer for the O'Connor Plat, but the timing of this work is not certain at this time. Without this correction, the storm sewer main which will serve the Stiegman Short Plat is not adequate for additional development, including the additional lots proposed with this particular plat. cc: John Thompson Ron Straka ��Y o CITY OF RENTON ♦ BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ��N�ro� Jesse Tanner,Mayor DFVFI OPMFNT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 7 1998 August 26, 1998 RECEIVED Walter Stiegman 2048 Poppwood Avenue Henderson NV 89012 SUBJECT: STEIGMAN SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL WELLS AVE. S.,SOUTH OF S.32ND ST.,RENTON WA Dear Mr. Stiegman The Board of Public Works met on August 19, 1998 to review your application for deferral of off-site improvements along the extension of S. 34th Street and Wells Avenue S., between Tract A and Lot 8. The Board approved your request, subject to the condition that if development occurs on Lot 8 or Tract A,that full roadway improvements be required. If development occurs on the southerly property, full improvements be installed within both S. 34th St. and Wells Ave. S. If you have questions concerning this action,please contact Paul Lumbert,Board Coordinator, at (425)430-7304. I rely, Mickie Flanagan,Recording S retary cc: Board Members Jennifer Toth-Henning,Planning Paul Lumbert,Plan Review Thomas C.O'Connor James Jaeger • tri 05 Louth Gradyy Wa -Renton,Washington 98055 (425)235-2569 H:�DIVISION.S\BPW\DEFE TIEGMAN.DO acsimiie (425)235-2541 %• CITIE JF RENTON NAL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Aug 1st 25, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SU3JECT: Stiegman Short Plat Project No. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: Th s letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental RE view Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. Nc appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation M 3asures. A:, you have already been notifiefd, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, R;nton, Washington, on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Short Plat (SHPL). The al 1plicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7286. F 3r the Environmental Review Committee, ()kiii\ Ifer'Tot Henning F roject Manager c c: Parties of Record Mr. Walter Stiegman/Owner —fINAL.DOC 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 Ott ]This nanar contains Se%recycled material.20%post consumer BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 8:30 a.m. Renton Municipal Building Wednesday,August 19, 1998 6th Floor Conference Room No. 602 IN ATTENDANCE: Jim Hanson, Chairman Larry Meckling, Building Official Dave Christensen,Utilities System Chuck Duffy, Fire Prevention Paul Lumbert, Plan Review Mickie Flanagan,Recording Secretary Jennifer Toth-Henning, Planning Judy Walter,P/B/PW Admin. Lisa Zurhorst,Finance Margy Doohan, Finance VISITORS: Thomas O'Connor, Stiegman Short Plat James Jaeger, Stiegman Short Plat MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 8:30 am. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOVED BY CHRISTENSEN,SECONDED BY MECKLING to approve meeting minutes dated, July 22, 1998. MOTION CARRIED. 3. REQUESTED ACTION: • VARIANCE, Crystal Heights Townhomes,LUA 098-003, 821 Sunset Blvd. NE, applicant requests a variance for driveway slopes. Action: Following a brief discussion, MOVED BY MECKLING, SECONDED BY CHRISTENSEN,to grant the variance subject to the engineer/surveyor certifying that the"as-built"driveways do not exceed a 15% grade at any point and that the angle of departure from Sunset Blvd.NE to the private roadway will accommodate all Fire Department vehicles without damage or hanging up of the vehicle. MOTION CARRIED. 4. OLD BUSINESS: • Lisa Zurhorst of the Finance Department to discuss past due revocable permit accounts. Discussion: The Board requested of P/B/PW Administration to provide copies of records of what each Revocable Permit was for. Chairman Jim Hanson will assign an inspector to visit each site and determine whether the permit is being used or has been abandoned. Letters will be sent to applicants before turning accounts over for collection. t • Stiezman Deferral: This item was not on the scheduled agenda and is a"last minute"addition due to the fact that a Short Plat hearing will occur in two weeks, and Board action is necessary prior to the meeting. Discussion: The city is requesting an improved right-of-way access, per the Subdivision Ordinance. An existing street goes into the adjacent O'Connor property where there are significant wetlands. The applicant has plans to move the wetlands,which will also require an additional Environmental Review, and applicant is requesting a deferral at this time, until Lot 8 or Tract A is developed. Action: MOVED BY CHRISTENSEN,SECONDED BY MECKLING to approve deferral of off-site improvements along the extention of S. 34th Street and Wells Avenue S., between Tract A and Lot 8; subject to the condition that if development occurs on Lot 8 or Tract A, that full roadway improvements be required. Afriendly amendment was made by Jim Hanson to add if development occurs on the southerly property,that full improvements be installed within both S. 34th St. and Wells Ave. S. CHRISTENSEN SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 5. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None 6. COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 7. CONSENT AGENDA: None 8. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Hanson closed the meeting at 9:05 am. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICA'"ION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,29E square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public str( ets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate ight-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral for the street improverr ents until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATIC N OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse mpact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.0.t0(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 2011 Mill Avenue-South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section '-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (4.25)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: August 10, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: August 04, 1998 SIGNATURES: „a 4,-- re.-)4_ , Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator DATE Departm ant of Planning/Building/Public Works rlrec - ( � 'r '� if e G� t y Jirfi Shel sherd", Administrator DA Commur ity Services OC-- I/—Yi- Lee E eler, ire Chief DATE Renton F ire Department DNSMSIG.JOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of VAA alter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. N'm Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 sc uare feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from ar existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the sf ort plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate ric ht-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for th street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street M TIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 for each new single family residential dwelling unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $488 per single family residential lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. In order to mitigate potential construction impacts associated with future road and utility construction, the applicant shall be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the potential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant's project engineer of record will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. Unless a deferral/waiver is granted for the construction of the proposed east/west street, then separate environmental review shall be required. Separate environmental review shall consider the impacts of road construction, development of proposed Lot No. 8, Tract A, and any impacts to on-site wetlands. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICANT: James Jaeger PROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of 'Natter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review- Transportation 1. Wells Ave South has been improved with full street improvements from South 34th Street to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in the adjacent Winsper development to the north. The Wells Ave. South right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of South 34th Street. South 34th Street is also fully improved from Wells Ave. South to the west property line of the short plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II (also known as Winsper View or O'Connor Plat). 2. Per the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line." As shown on the revised short plat submittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend from South 34th Street to the southwest corner of the subject property, with a minimum right-of-way width of 42 feet. This right- of-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements constructed for the Winsper II (O'Connor) plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specifically, this means extension of Wells Ave. South to the south property line, and extension of South 34th Street to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. Stiegman Short Plat L UA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) F age 2of3 4 A deferral from Board of Public Works will be required to defer the improvement of the rest of South 34th Street to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that development on Tract A and Lot 8 would be prohibited until such time as the street improvements are completed. Flan Review-Water 5 There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension in Wells Ave South. A fire hydrant and all n'eters boxes to serve the proposed homesites are installed. 6 The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$850 per single family site. This fee i! payable prior to recording of the short plat. F Ian Review-Sanitary Sewer 7 Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by Soos Creek Public Utilities. An extension in Wells P venue South has been provided for this short plat. 8 The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate determined by Soos Creek Public L tilities. A letter of availability shall be required prior to recording of the short plat. F Ian Review -Stormwater 9. A proposed storm system hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on this property has been constructed. The system and report conform to the standards set in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There are existing wetlands on the site. 10. The System Development Charge shall be at the rate of$385 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. F Ian Review-General 11. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 12. A construction permit is required for any additional work in dedicated right of way. If no further work is required for this short plat, no construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. 13. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 14. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. tiegman Short Plat L UA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF J.dvisory Notes (Continued) Page 3 of 3 5. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall t e submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to :30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. I'ire Prevention 6. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to • ,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 7. A Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. The fee is due prior 1 o recording oft the short plat. 'arks 18. A Parks Mitigation Fee is required for the new single family residential lots. The fee is $530.76 and s due prior to the recording of the short plat. Property Services 19. Comments from Property Services will be forwarded to the applicant under separate cover. Renton School District 20. Students residing the in Stiegman Short Plat would attend Talbot Hill Elementary School, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton or Lindbergh High School. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Tie Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the fc Ilowing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT/LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Environmental review to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Location: Wells Ave. South, South of So. 32nd Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 21, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing E Kaminer, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way„ Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are g)verned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the a ppeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. P Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council C hambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 AM t(1 consider the Short Plat. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as f art of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: August 10, 1998 d account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot CITY QF RENTON. .. CURRENT PLANNING bIVIS10N AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of 14+ uSfi , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 0QL adeftwtt trodurrs documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) SIVA4ot..l-• Scesice STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for The uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 0. y (o) / UU Notary Public' and for the State ofirdashington Notary (Print) My appointment ellihtfillYt KAMCH FF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 1 Project Name: s.t'teavnc l SMovit ?tart Project Number: L13f1 is.024,, StiP I —h ,SC.1" NOTARY.DOC NO110E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-026,SHPL-H,ECF Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied.on behalf of Walter Stiegman,to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel Into eight(8)residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels(new lots 1,2,3,5,8.7)would range from 5,757-8.338 square feel in size. New Lot No.4 would be 9,540 s.f.,new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet,and Tract A would be 47,184 square feet. Category 11 and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the shod plat would be from an existing street,Wells Avenue South.City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west,but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street Improvements until such lime that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of- way would cross two wetlands,and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future Impacts occur.The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. Location: Wells Ave.South,south of South 32nd Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM,August 24,1998. peals must be filed In willing together with the required 975.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way„Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerks ' Office,(425)-235-2501. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Short Plat(SHPL). If the Environmental Determination Is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. . 1 ( ,.Tr -s NORTH _ t _ .r . rr • 5 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, ,%/r / wjr7 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on //1/6-u;i - / 9q� • Signed: ‘7,14-' ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing in`IL3,o-,t -&- , on the /4.7, l''1-, day of ( c e. /6;yid) . . 7)/) a zaX /-47)-Y1&4.g0 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POS1 ED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJE(:T NAME: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied,on behalf of Walter Stiegman,to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and Ill wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street,Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant propose;to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of- way would cross two wetlands,and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. Location: Wells Ave.South,south of South 32nd Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. peals must be fi ed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way„ Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-23t-2501. THE CITY 0= RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMEI if. A Public Hear ng will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on tl le seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 F M to consider the Short Plat (SHPL). If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be I-eard as part of this public hearing. J. SP4111-;47,, ,..:',4 ✓ 4�/ I ra, P _ • �I''�'�, 9 �: 4,A1��i Shy f Y �'Y�i s e 9 41._m maxwe .» \4 ' - III ; nF -0 I' '_ - : '_ ' °a 1i iTtl ne a^ : _. / .. . .9,cil ilzt s •7:f ., ,... ii ::.• .. ...__ iit s: .... .._. _ : , •CI\el 4.‘' 7 I tilibm4" FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO N JT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Plea:,e include the project NUMBER when calling for proper,file identification. I �, CIT'K OF -RENTON ..0 ( Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 5, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environr rental Review Committee (ERC) on August 04, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE :iTIEGMAN SHORT PLAT I_UA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension Df public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant aroposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral y waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of- way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. Location: Wells Ave. South, south of South 32nd Street. Appeal:, of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 Sc uth Grady Way„ Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, I 425)-235-2501. If you hive questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, • okArip. 1____01,4\ (., ,_ei(A:Ac) c-- rmif- oth enning Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYf TR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CIT". OF RENTON .. . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse fanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 0 i, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 So ith 204th Place Kent, W,A 98031 SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat Project No. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Dear Mr Jaeger: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on August 04, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Signific�nce-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeal:, of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 Sc uth Grady Way„ Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on September 08, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Short Plat (SHPL). The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the f ublic hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal eights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (.25) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, —(6t-FN l-161 Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Parties of Record Mr. Walter Stiegman/Owner Enclos ire DNSME R.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ©)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES A PPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF A PPLICANT: James Jaeger F ROJECT NAME: Stiegman Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and III wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate r ght-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street l,dvisory Notes to Applicant: i he following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the nvironmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review- Transportation . Wells Ave South has been improved with full street improvements from South 34th Street to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in the adjacent Winsper development to the north. The Wells Ave. South right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of South 34th Street. South 34th Street is also fully improved from Wells Ave. South to the west property line of the short plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II (also known as Winsper View or O'Connor Plat). 2. Per the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line." As shown on the revised short plat submittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend from South 34th Street I the southwest corner of the subject property, with a minimum right-of-way width of 42 feet. This right- )f-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements (:onstructed for the Winsper II (O'Connor) plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South adjacent to ihe lots proposed for development. Specifically, this means extension of Wells Ave. South to the south property line, and extension of South 34th Street to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. Stiegman Short Plat L JA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 3 of 3 15. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall Le submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. F ire Prevention 16. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. "7. A Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. The fee is due prior t) recording oft the short plat. Parks • 8. A Parks Mitigation Fee is required for the new single family residential lots. The fee is $530.76 and i s due prior to the recording of the short plat. Property Services 19. Comments from Property Services will be forwarded to the applicant under separate cover. Renton School District 20. Students residing the in Stiegman Short Plat would attend Talbot Hill Elementary School, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton or Lindbergh High School. • STAFF City of Renton RE°ORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE August 4, 1998 Profit ct Name Stiegman Short Plat Applicant James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 File !lumber LUA-098-026,SHPL-H,ECF Proje:t Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to Project Description subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) would range from 5,757 - 6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and Ill wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. City Code requires the extension of public streets through the short plat to serve the short plat and adjacent landlocked parcels. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west, but will seek a deferral or waiver for the street improvements until such time that the adjacent parcels develop. The proposed right-of-way would cross two wetlands, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands either on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. Projei;t Location Wells Avenue South, south of South 32nd Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site A rea 4.99 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECC'MMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated(DNS-M). • • • it Q *tile* '.: ' /` '_ �. o •. 1' �1 L S & L� 1ir. -' f B tom..... • �•'•Q fl2 • 3 o- .p. �.._.._ ill! i Vitt , `�.:Z ] ,l -1 a - to i t R .4 i Il x 4_.,m•Q --�Rttel•• , av ;I ... 7- �., -,I 1 �:i� :a ,� - ' :..,_ i 4a .. . 1i - Project Location Map I 17,.. �T t ,p ti •' at RPT.DOC City of.Renton P/B/PW Department .ronmental Review Committee Staff Report • STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPOR9 AND DECISION OF AUGUST 4,1998 Page2 of 7 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 for each new single family residential dwelling unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $488 per single family residential lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. In order to mitigate potential construction impacts associated with future road and utility construction, the applicant shall be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the potential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant's project engineer of record will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. Unless a deferral/waiver is granted for the construction of the proposed east/west street, then separate environmental review shall be required. Separate environmental review shall consider the impacts of road construction, development of proposed Lot No. 8, Tract A, and any impacts to on-site wetlands. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental deter urination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal procoss for environmental determinations. Plan Review- Transportation 1. Wells Ave South has been improved with full street improvements from South 34th Street to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in the adjacent Winsper development to the north. The Wells Ave. South right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of South 34th ,street. South 34th Street is also fully improved from Wells Ave. South to the west property line of the short ERCRP'..DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,,,.,ronmental Review Committee Staff Report • STIEG WAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 4, 1998 Page3 of 7 plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II (also known as Winsper View or O'Connor Plat) 2. Por the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line." As shown on the revised short plat 5 ubmittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend from South 34th Street to the southwest corner of the s ibject property, with a minimum right-of-way width of 42 feet. This right-of-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements constructed for the Winsper II (O'Connor) plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specifically, this means extension of Wells Ave. South to the south property line, and extension of South 34th Street to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. 4. A deferral from Board of Public Works will be required to defer the improvement of the rest of South 34th Street to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that development on Tract A and Lot 8 would be prohibited until such time as the street improvements are completed. Plan Review -Water 5. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension in Wells Ave South. A fire hydrant and all meters boxes to serv€ the proposed homesites are installed. 6. Tt e System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$850 per single family site. This fee is payable prior o recording of the short plat. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 7. Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by Soos Creek Public Utilities. An extension in Wells Avenue South has been provided for this short plat. 8. Tt e System Development Charge shall be at the current rate determined by Soos Creek Public Utilities. A letter of av Iilability shall be required prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review-Stormwater 9. A proposed storm system hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on this property has been constructed. The system and report conform to the standards set in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There are existing wetlands on the site. 10. 1 he System Development Charge shall be at the rate of$385 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review-General 11. / II plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 12. / construction permit is required for any additional work in dedicated right of way. If no further work is required for th s short plat, no construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copier of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fount floor counter. 13. l emporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Deve opment Services Division for the duration of the project. 14. V Jeekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revisi)n to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public ERCRP ..DOC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment L,,.wonmental Review Committee Staff Report STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 4, 1998 Page4 of 7 Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is requi;ed prior to recording of the short plat. 15. i, construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be subrr itted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Fire I3revention 16. f,fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requi es two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 17. /, Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. The fee is due prior to recording of t tt e short plat. Park; 18. /, Parks Mitigation Fee is required for the new single family residential lots. The fee is $530.76 and is due prior to the recording of the short plat. Property Services 19. Comments from Property Services will be forwarded to the applicant under separate cover. Rent Mn School District 20. students residing the in Stiegman Short Plat would attend Talbot Hill Elementary School, Dimmitt Middle School and Fenton or Lindbergh High School. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: The proposed short plat would result in increased traffic trips on the local street system, and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The trip generation values are based on the ITE trip Generation Manual which estimates 9.55 average daily trips per single family residence, or a total estimated Traffic Mitigation Fee of$5,730 for the proposed 8 lots. The fee would be required to be paid prior to recording of the plat. Mitigai on Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Nexus Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, and adopting Ordinance; Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 4-6. 2. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal would allow for the construction of 8 new detached single family residential homes. Future residents would make use of the existing and future City of Renton park and recreation facilities located throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities, the City has adopted a mitigation fee of$530.76 per each new single family residence. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. ERCRP- .DOC City of.?enton P/B/PWDepartment Environmental Review Committee Staff Report STIEGMMIAN SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 4,1998 Page5 of 7 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 for each new single family residential dwelling unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. Nexus Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 4-6. 3. Emergency Services- Fire Impacts: The proposal would add new residential building lots to the City that would eventually be developed with new single family detached homes. The potential need for emergency services by the new residents would impact the Ciiv's Fire Department, contributing to the need for additional equipment, facilities and employees. A Fire Mitigal ion Fee would apply to all new construction at a rate of$488 per each new single family residential unit. For 8 new building lots, the fee is estimated to be $3,904 (8 lots x$488 = $3,904.00). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior tE the recording of the short plat Mitigal ion Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $488 per single family residential lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 4-6. 4. Wetlands Impacl s: Two existing wetlands are located on the subject site. Wetland "A" is a large, forested wetland that is located both on the southern portion of the site and off-site on an adjacent property to the south. The wetland is 51,98C square feet in size or 3.42 acres. It is vegetated with canopy of Oregon ash on the east and a mix of ash and black cottonwood on the west. Understory species include willow, buttercup, dock, nightshade, fern, nettle and horset.iil. Wetland A contains portions of the Spring Glen coal mine. This wetland meets the criteria for a Category 2 wetland due to its large size and headwater location. However, since the areas within the delineation have been substantially disturbed in the past from mining activities, a portion of the wetland would be considered to be Category 3. A portion of proposed lots No 6 and 7 would encroach into the buffer of Wetland A. New Lot 8 would contain a portior of the wetland and buffer area. In addition, the proposed dedication of a future public street extending to the west would encroach into the wetland area. The subdivision of the property would not impact this wetland, and sufficiE nt area is available on the proposed parcels to construct homes without intruding into the required 25-foot buffer .or Category 3 wetlands. In order to mitigate the impacts that could occur from intrusion into the wetland buffer, staff will recommend as part of the short plat approval that the applicant be required to erect a split rail fence defining the edge of the wetland buffer where it crosses proposed Lots 6 and 7. In addition, during the short plat review process, staff will recommend that the development of new Lot 8 be restricted until such time that the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division project manager that the parcel can be developed without impacting the wetland or buffer area. Any development upon or access to either Lot 8 or Tract A would ieed to meet the requirements of the City's Wetlands Ordinance. Furthe more, at the time that future subdivision occurs, beyond the parcels proposed for the Stiegman Short Plat, or the stru iet to the west is constructed, then any disturbed portions of the wetlands would require mitigation. Wetlar d "B" is contained on the western portion of the property. Wetland B is a disturbed and hydrologically isolated 16,459 square foot wetland. This wetland is similar to Wetland B in vegetation, soils and hydrology. It would be classified as a Category 3 wetland per the City's Wetlands Ordinance. New Lot No. 8 would contain the majority of Wetlar d B and its 25-foot buffer area. Sufficient area exists for building a single family home without disturbing the wetlanii or buffer. Further subdivision of Lot No. 8 in the future, or the extension of the new public street to the west could i npact the wetland area and its buffer. Mitigation would need to occur if future subdivision occurs or the road is extended to the west. The applicant's proposal would not result in disturbance of the on-site wetlands. A letter has been submitted with the project application that verifies the potential mitigation area for any wetland impacts occurring on the Stiegman proper y. The property located immediately to the south was reviewed and wetlands were delineated on that site. The wetlands ecologist determined that there is adequate and appropriate area available for he creation of additional wetland area. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. ERCRPT.DOC LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE DATA: The north 330 feet of the south 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest • Total Property area. 8.99 aces Number 1/4 of Section 29.Township 23 N.,Range 5 E..W.M..EXCEPT the east 660Lots: 8 Cityof Renton ton Zoning: 5. (8 lots per acre) feet thereof. Smallest Lot:Right-of-Way: 59 53 SF Area Average Lot Size: 6.410 SF 10 SF(not include.lot 8) VI in '`,..;C o ; :Di`v i i d W 1 I I I , C' I I 3 a h re I T ACI' r"3 ` . . I I I I I 13 Q Z9 2!( t . 1 I I I ('� j t" I, t —L I f151. 14.I L— ' S01' ZO' 43"I �- I 1I N IAA 410.14 I�m.o' w.�:1 '{-' 97.E o s Is . � I 1 I o / \ r000�F 56zo sF 1 V / I/1 4 • ...7 I. 1 \ \ / I -- YrI: 1. I r I- I ,se I I, --i 4 —'F='h4��i2ey,E _ 4 \` T I 3I'!: ..," , I 2 SF I pcI`r a .... 5------‘ _Loo.o.—- , \ tom` 1�1 t r I I rM Y n R a. j i ; Y 1 7 T .. I 3 �. : ..,.... ! v,,ERHtiD ` / ; 111 l0334 SF. 1FlN. 'S7'$7 SF I J M s \ IV,45G SF s�y / I I 1 abR ®\t`/. i i MlFI,lR •- S I lcr¢ ---- ---�----Ora " -._ _ - --- -,iN f • ■AIL!• .� 1 4 t i I I l �`` •'' _�� /' / �wtTu.4�.,O 1 I .. ,,>5b——�:o Z '� ——— I I --� -T- ---- 3.42 A E9 i ili \ IGIQew .5o' gp.FeuFFF.R / 10 euFFGR Ilii -2 i weRpts,.w -e TRncr q\`'\ I v41 4 I T� �� \ `,\• IIIR t•A ly 9F.y{(7 lu 1�- R...w. r. I ---r- �r —r c, vViO-J wr_nnwlp 'A' ra —-- Su.o' `'I wog III II Iw.i,oFFsahi� — I��`� N at' eo' 43" W LSei.00' —4.o' 7" �I) IIII -} �- y DATE: SP- •. So, tern - scAtE: I ,�' STIEGMAN 8 LOT SHORT PLAT SHEET- 111 09 4e STREET EASGi JAEGER ENGINEERING _ Zo 4o P. F EDGE1100D, WA 98372 9419 S.204 Pt Kent,Wa.98031 DRAWN: J.J.J PHONE 883-2321 (206) 850-0934 DE10N J: .3.3, q S. 35 ST & S. WELLS ST 1 ScAL -. i' • 40' - JoB: OF 1 City ofFenton P/B/PW Department .:rt ironmental Review Committee Staff Report STIEGM/AN SHORT PLAT LEA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPORT IND DECISION OF AUGUST 4,1998 Page6 of 7 Nexus: Not applicable. 5. Construction Impacts Impacts: Wells Ave South has been improved with full street improvements from South 34th Street to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in the adjacent Winsper development to the north. The Wells Avenue South right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of South 34th S reet. South 34th Street is also fully improved from Wells Ave. South to the west property line of the short plat, where t connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II (also known as Winsper View or O'Connor Plat). The ar plicant is not proposing new construction as part of the application. However, full street improvements will be requirE d per City Code in South 34th Street and Wells Avenue South adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specif cally, this means extension of Wells Ave. South to the south property line, and extension of South 34th Street to the 'vest margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the ter 1porary ends of these two streets. A deferral or waiver from Board of Public Works will be required in order to defer or waive the improvement of the rest of South 34th Street to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that dE velopment on Tract A and Lot 8 would be prohibited until such time as the street improvements are completed. For any construction permits that are obtained to complete roads or utilities, the applicant will be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the potential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certifi ration of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Mitigation Measure: In order to mitigate potential construction impacts associated with future road and utility construction, the applicant shall be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures, to the satisfaction of the City's representative of the Development Services Division, for the duration of the project. Due to the pctential for downstream stormwater and erosion impacts, the applicant's project engineer of record will be required to submit weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules to the City's Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. In addition, a construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Mitiq�tion Measure: Unless a deferral/waiver is granted for the construction of the proposed east/west street, then separate environmental review shall be required. Separate environmental review shall consider the impacts of road consti uction, development of proposed Lot No. 8, Tract A, and any impacts to on-site wetlands. The applicant shall undergo separate environmental review for the Nexu:;: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 4-6. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The i,roposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Note; to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. ERCR 'T.DOC City of RentonP/B/PWDepartment fl„.,ronmentalReview Committee Staff Report STIEGAL4N SHORT PLAT LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF REPORT 4ND DECISION OF AUGUST 4, 1998 Pagel of 7 Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 24, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCRPT.DOC Rev%scd City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: , ho AV- telgibp114I OMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No.4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS j)ie (5 oe r4-srvvj7Cp 0e).,7i siyse,,L6 t.Y (RS) A-n Zon, O 5)T`i C(}Yvrv07 rat C/a LC U Ll9 700 W 1T Hou i r-on THe (D rtzrzejq ow-Sit c 'THts G4 PtJi1 Ir-/e-LUOLrS Pr erit eoz ASOT iAJ LUOU� iN 7 1-16 052-1G.IrJ - cr. 1-khjc�, \ler"6 -r 7NL (567-(C.r111 PRaWoS IS /N T CL1: [ - NO 'Po L(( K (SSuer3 • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have r_viewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w ere additionaLinformation iine,eded to properly assess this proposal. 7/c2y/9� Signature o irec r Authorize epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 K eV 1 CCI I nil RE NTON FARE D t ; rhir UR EPT City . ..�nton Department of Planning/Building/Pt .. Norks R , ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW,' Si-$E TA', 98 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FN PvevcAA- tcryA COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 19981-1� �1,../10 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757-6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet /A�/1^ //►' j� _1(— {/� //�� �/114,000 Feet /1 ///,/t 61 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 11 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS tt< We have eviewed this a lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w re additional n mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si nat re of Director or uthor' ed Representative Date 007 DE AP .DOC Rev.10/93 • TY �. CITY OF RENTON ��NTo FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 22, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat, S 32nd nd S . & Wells Av. S Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single family structures. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Revised - City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pub„. —'orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres L BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757-6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No.4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet �p 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS / 29 G� C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7-Ar.412 avw /2,0,4,-)/7.XeCeZT We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date / 2/? DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 29, 1998 TO: JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT REVIEW We have reviewed the revised submittal information for the Stiegman Short Plat and have the following comments: The review comments listed in the March 18, 1998 memo by Kayren Kittrick (copy attached) are still applicable for sewer, water and surface water issues. The plans have been revised in response to our earlier listed concerns with the street improvements shown for the short plat. Transportation (revised) 1. Wells Ave S has been improved with full street improvements from S 34th St to the north edge of the short plat, connecting to the improved street system in Winsper. The Wells Av. S right-of-way currently is extended to the south property line, but is not improved south of S 34th St. S 34th St is also fully improved from Wells Av. S to the west property line of the short plat, where it connects into the fully developed street system of Winsper II. 2. Per the City of Renton Subdivision Code (Section 9-12-15G), "Streets which may be extended in the event of future adjacent platting may be required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line." As shown on the revised short plat submittal, right-of-way dedication will be required to extend S 34th St to the southwest corner of the subject property, with a minimum right-of- way width of 42 feet. This right-of-way will be dedicated in the location of the existing sewer and storm drainage improvements constructed for the Winsper II plat development. 3. Full street improvements will be required in S 34th St and Wells Av. S adjacent to the lots proposed for development. Specifically, this means extension of Wells Av. S to the south property line, and extension of S 34th St to the west margin of proposed Lot 7. These improvements will include as a minimum, 32 feet of pavement width, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to Lots 4 and 7, provisions for street drainage, and signing/barricades for the temporary ends of these two streets. • • JULY 27, 1998 PAGE 2 4. A deferral from Board of Public Works will be required for the improvement of the rest of S 34th St to the westerly property line of the subject parcel. If approved by the Board, it is expected that covenants will be required requiring participation in the cost of future development of the street by the individual lots of the short plat, and a prohibition of development on Tract A and Lot 8 until such time as the street improvements are completed. cc: Kayren Kittrick Revised City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S.. e I U e6iewe COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street t.� J SITE AREA: 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to sub a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7 t..e S e-pan&lt g t►M P• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t\.)) A- 7/g7/16 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1 U53 ReVISeci City of Renton Department Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ptav RReV‘euJ 'COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning�'OFR PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 . LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street ` ,,.?i, SITE AREA: 4.99 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A ��+�,.to� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to stfbdiyide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3,5�; 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5 ce cr/44 44 wit woo We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/53 Reviscd City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—Ti$ 61eN, COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 1998 n APPLICANT: Mr.James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning Ok PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 Jf r' LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street (IC SITE AREA: 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied, on behalf of Walter Stiegman, to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels (new lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7)would range from 5,757 -6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No. 4 would be 9,540 s.f., new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet, and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street, Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas, and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More' Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5-c.t. pc I tt WtcvU). We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatiooJn is needed to properly assess this proposal. et/76- 147%q 3 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1 G53 CIT'_ OF RENTON NaLL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor July 21, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat Project No. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has accepted revisions for the subject project for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 4, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, September 08, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425)430-7286. Sincerely, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. Walter Stiegman/Owner Riffles 0 f' `Rec..o Yd ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Cam]Thic naner contains WY.racvnlwd matnrial 90%nnct rnncumar % © CITY OF RENTON _ .� Planning/Building/Public Works a � � c " , JUL2 2'9 8 �I5 = �.,� Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 co ; �r�dk = 2 9 CC CC PB • ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a. v MEr._ „ 4 T 2 3 9 fi F t O t�+f 05�5 �'��s• r�4 s�'� Milton & Linda Grantham 9915 S 169th P1 Renton WA 98055 is :s.S J A3LE x -'T~ DJiiCSSLO •" C.7 1—.,,LE T4: FORWARD �'-,- ' " ( EEEB'-';'G_ NV -. tRETITN 0 SENDER c a � ' �', )7S7:-.:".it1?'a`3 iiihihilill1 =illsil,iri}lilmill�: itil}il!illin wild © CITY OF RENTON - -w.tt -� Planning/Building/Public Works Q J ��di • w 1 AL 2 2'9 8 fro%*s : 0 .2 9 S 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 W ; .•c�rttn ¢ S + ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a v P MET� FUAs *S19 i� / - O T i 3 9 8 F C O t��(15ai r AC.._) Ashlyrin & D a 10023 E 168th Dawson S Renton W Ct A 98055 W{ 1.Fk:3LE tx- -mi. $Z -- - T"FC',sl triJ <.;• -.Q„ ,..' 1 _NV 1i 1i /� 7 (� r1 p , 6. n; ,�j,�y��}_f ! ! f i ! t ! j t 7 i i i ! i! i 1!!i l etZ lUilf� 1�J JEI\U C.iI ^/ ', i simiwiirpire.: ild..fi?111II!'41ii!!i!1tti1!I7!i11li4l E1ff!fll!il1Il Ee Eilli{ 1 311�': immosimmiumnrwmpil ioitArriNfIg:kitengle54 , a 0 CITY OF RENTON d"P"' • i Planning/Building/Public Works k. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 A 1 1....enzt, .. _ • a *** * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED P0Mgrqo * 71505* U.S. POSTAGE : Georgette Levesque ctf., 3136 Wells Ave S abb. Renton WA 98055 111 -... - hi ----.---....---..., _i --- C Cn ild - 1 RETL:ni4 A SLNDER :1, \1;ok''----17 ,-...\;;L-To SearirStS,":41.era Iiiitil!litliiiiiiillitilifillil ItItistlilittlilittinilltithillitilli © CITY OF RENTON .< ,; ,� �,��;��;, •,c- -., 1 Planning/Building/Public Works I- a ���' qi; AL 22'98 r Cc -I200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 N ~ %1' °' .: 2 9 IA, to strtva Mery ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED �gx � Pl5056q U.S. POSTAGE x !•s rO o .�%OF9pp,��Rg6l Cl_ i -------......................_ Ank.ng Ming & Yan Yu e. Eq 740j p a W Emer-•n Ave #6 g'Y,i�✓61 Ho;u ' a 985 V au-ynSarSSS/ .ietS Ihitilt,ItIi,,,tl,I„itl„tll,l Itl,lttl,l,,,1,I,,,III,tI,ltutli,,,ll,t,ll,r,l • Proposed Mitigation Measures: v�Y fJ^ Theldlowng Mdgaliun Measures wilt likelylc i onidon the prisms.pioud.tloseluwlelvadlW Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and ragulaboM as died above. ♦�A ♦ 1.Traffic Mitigation Fe.:pulvatent to 175 per each now average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. r''INP,J• 2.Firs Mitigation Fee:equivalent b 9458 per each new sinyle family residential parcel created. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 3.Parks Mitigation Fe.:equivalent to$531.T6 per nob new single family residential parcel created. 4.Wetlands Mitigation:follow recommendations of wetlands biologist for mitigating impacts to wetland areas. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF 5.Geolechnical Recommendations:follow recommendations of geolechnlcal engineer for the construction of NON SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) site Infrastructure and future building foundations. Comments on Um above application must be subnillad M writing to Jennifer Toth Hemming,Project Manager,Development GATE: July 21,1998 Services Division,1055 South Grady Way.Renton.WA 98055.by 5:00 PM on August 24,1998.This matter is also scheduled fora pubs:hearing on September 8,1998 et 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor City Hall Building.1055 South Grady Way,Renton.Washington.II you are Interested M etlondMg the hearing,please contact Ne Development Services Division.(425)430-T202.to ensure Natthe hearing has not been rescheduled.if comments LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-016,SHPL41,ECF cannel be submitted M writing by the date Indicated above.you may still appear al the hearing and present your APPLICATION NAME: STIES/MN SNORT PLAT Party on Ne prno osel belwe Me Hearing Examiner.11 you have queelions abut Ihis Prot-meat.Orwish e e made a parry of record and receNe additional intormation by mail.contact Ma.Jennifer Toth Henning at(425)430-7288.Anyone who submitswritten comment.wR automatically become•party of reuad and cad be notified of any detisen on the PROJECT DESCRIPTION: J.Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied on Wulff d Waller Sliegmen,to prgecL subdivide a 499 acre parcel kno eight(8)residantid lots and a separate tract for wetlands.Six of the parcels(new lots I. 2,3.5.6,1,weld range from 5.757-5,336 square feel m size.New Lot No.4 would be 9.540 s.f.,new Lot would be PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAL LING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 75.295 aquere feet,and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet Category II end II wetlands are present on Me site.Access to the shore alai would be Iron an existing street,Was Avenue South The applicant proposes to dedicate righted-way Ica Cie Mae construction action re e public street to the west.The gopoeed nght4N-way will cross several wetland seas,end DATE OF APPLICATION: Mardi 2,1998 e anolira tie Proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or°Ude when the future impacts owe.The proposal requires environmental revNw end Mon pale' NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Reissued July 16,1998 PROJECT LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,south 01 South 32nd Street. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 10,1998 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED IONS-M):As the lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined deal significant environmental kneads are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefoe,as Permitted under the RCW 43.21C.t r0,the City of Renton Is using the Optional CASON)process to give notice Nat a DNS- M is likely to be issued.Content penods to Vm project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period fallowing the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated IONS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 2.1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Re-Issued July 21,1998 Permits/Review Permits/Review Rpwated Shot Plat Approval.Environmental Review 4I1+1! i --i .1Yt • ` D er Permits which neY be required Not applicable I.S. yy Ik ra t . I 3. a� Reg W S udes, Wetlands Analysis Report • TT:41.t' T I - TT,, Location where application may ii t ar.-}3 jT;1. .�•- b.reviewed: Planning/BuilJing 1,W Walks Division.Development Services Department. ((s���,,,��� i F L 1055 South Grad W ~ {.t )4. st P •, Y eel-6N Floor,Raman.WA 98058WIll _ >k PUBLIC REARING: SEPTEMBER 8,1998 j-_._•Q tlr''5• aSva a• et•"'-} -t •,'-'• 4 t,:,•:: t M CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: _`.,,,t. � . •e1 Land U5./Ioning: Residential-8 Dwelling Units per Acre(RS)-The proposed short plat would 'r ��ne��• - e5ult in fewer We th.are pormined by he density range of the RE Zone.The - + ;� 1�f R-lY1i •• `'••^ presence d wedads prevents further subdividing without mitigating la wetland _-I- - •� .T, impacts.The eppecanl has provided a shadow plat which demonstrates future I • -'y I'•r a ��.�aaii:nn _ •.- • • bd I to meetminimum density requkeme a The proposal is generally f - ) YT r V_h • consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and Zoning Code requirements. _ ) Wetlands Ordinance: Theapplicant is proposing a dedicate right-of-way for future road construction - !fLD♦ � • wetland f property of theMips weal The cetera toed woodexistingon-site site wetlands.Medief tufuture construction otland impactsnstructionm would occur then naltotloff- site •,uj;-;r 1•iiittt Lahr.•--ft(( _ at the pie Ida future road egnalroctian oecraa Area 'table m sib to reptecoMmpactedwe0ands. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geolednnical Engineering Study-O'Connor Plat:O'Connor Plat Wetland Analysis Report Talbot Trunk Variance(File No.LUA-096-116.V) Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal Will be subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance, Zoning Code regulations,Welerd regulations,Pubic Woks Standards.Uniform Building Code.Uniform Fee Code.etc.Those adapted codes and standards will tendon a Idtlgate project Mpacts. GU4 Lon OPC OEMaNOTOcC CERTIFICATION • r �/p/A I, .10/1/ 'i" i �"� r 014 e eb certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in cons icuous ces on or nearby the described roe on 7 f ( a� property rtY r 4111 lit / •igne I: 11,7IPh ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a No a • Public,7.. an!:! h e State of Washington residing ui eia.,v% , on the ; day of . - % /-l ---cis/'/ 771,41i4977 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 r • � ��NT NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 21,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Jim Jaeger or Jaeger Engineering has applied,on behalf of Walter Stiegman,to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8)residential lots and a separate tract for wetlands. Six of the parcels(new lots 1, 2,3,5,6,7)would range from 5,757-6,336 square feet in size. New Lot No.4 would be 9,540 s.f.,new Lot 8 would be 75,295 square feet,and Tract A would be 47,164 square feet. Category II and II wetlands are present on the site. Access to the short plat would be from an existing street,Wells Avenue South. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way for the future construction of a public street to the west. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas,and the applicant proposes to recreate the wetlands on site or off-site when the future impacts occur. The proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. PROJECT LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,south of South 32nd Street. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 2,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Re-issued July 21,1998 • Permits/Review Requested: Short Plat Approval,Environmental Review Other Permits which may be required: Not applicable Requested Studies: Wetlands Analysis Report • Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way—6th Floor,Renton,WA 98058 PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 8,1998 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: Residential-8 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-8)—The proposed short plat would result in fewer lots than are permitted by the density range of the R-8 Zone. The presence of wetlands prevents further subdividing without mitigating for wetland impacts. The applicant has provided a shadow plat which demonstrates future subdivision to meet minimum density requirements. The proposal is generally "t Iu IQO consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and Zoning Code requirements. Aed U lk Wetlands Ordinance: The applicant is proposing to dedicate right-of-way for future road construction S.S• through the property to the west. The future road would cross existing site wetlands. Mitigation of future wetland impacts would occur either on-site or off- site at the time the future road construction occurs. Area is available on site to replace impacted wetlands. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Study-O'Connor Plat;O'Connor Plat Wetland Analysis Report Talbot Trunk Variance(File No.LUA-096-116,V) Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance, Zoning Code regulations,Wetland regulations,Pubic Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. GENMALOT.DOC Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the,,.,,,,.....od project. those recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$75 per each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. 2. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$488 per each new single family residential parcel created. 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$531.76 per each new single family residential parcel created. 4. Wetlands Mitigation: follow recommendations of wetlands biologist for mitigating impacts to wetland areas. 5. Geotechnical Recommendations: follow recommendations of geotechnical engineer for the construction of site infrastructure and future building foundations. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on August 24,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 8,1998 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor City Hall Building,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning at(425)430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: March 2,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Re-issued July 16,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 16,1998 • - ) h1 � ' k a s r-4T y� IV\• 7 ,`f: ;II 11 '.. 1 07. 147,;\*.,.., ..,..:. .-,A ..:er it,,-.4...., ,-. , NOSH J Aev.ti t, •.:Y..,!..,*i,.,. S 1...:.,...f:..1.:..ro n. .` � �p� ate` ,» ' D..••.'.,., , . .I_,__.\7is.)__'.i.l.-_1._.-7.--,v•,i:,..:\i, ,-•,--.-,.,,., K' . ,.a1... Jy� f {,,4 _ sa. GENMALOT.DOC - Tieth-Ming Cheng Max Frazier UC & D INC 11510 17th Ave NE 3340 Talbot Rd S 4121 15th Ave S Seattle WA 98125 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98108 Ricardo Lockhart Natalie Lockhart Joseph & Carol Walker Milton & Linda Grantham 9907 S 169th P1 9911 S 169th P1 9915 S 169th P1 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Mike & Lily Luu Dawn Thorsness Shang Yen & Diana Yuen 9919 S 169th P1 729 S 32nd St 731 S032nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Billy Dang Clayton & Deanna Calhoun Alan Fessell 737 S 32nd St 9934 S 169th P1 734 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Chun Hong Yan John & Lizabeth Cesare Wai Fun To Ms Thornton 728 S 32nd St 720 S 32nd St 712 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 George Deeney David Miyatake Susan Gregorios L B Vicki Albert & Cathlee King 706 S 32nd St 9917 S 168th P1 9921 S 168th P1 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 William & Hisami Hoglund 9925 S 168th P1 Renton WA 98055 LUA• 98. oil° ,ShPI-1I.E{P Laura (Tr) Gannon uiNG CONSTRUCTION & ASSO John & Kathi Hipp 16749 Addison St PO Box 23998 3451 Cedar Ave S Encino CA 91436 Federal Way WA 98093 Renton WA 98055 Fang Ming & Yan Yu Deborah Hansen Robbin & Mary Hoppe 220 W Emerson Ave #6 10009 SE 169th P1 10013 SE 169th P1 Hoquiam WA 98550 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Douglas & Maria Nelson Robert & Lucy Scoverski Kevin & Sue Ung 819 S 32nd St 10021 SE 169th P1 907 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Benjamin Greene John & Nana Wong Chau Sheryl Anderson 1715 Market St #104 919 S 32nd St 120 Longwater Dr Kirkland WA 98033 Renton WA 98055 Norwell MA 02061 David & Marilyn Guerra Joan Edmonds Rufino Merca 10041 SE 169th P1 3206 Wells Ave S 16908 101st P1 SE Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Harrison Lau & Anna Au Georgette Levesque Thomas & Brenda Rossman 3142 Wells Ave S 3136 Wells Ave S 3130 Wells Ave S Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Theodore Harder Oliver & Emma Udani Roger & Loreta Habon Crossley Harder 16838 101st P1 SE 16832 101st P1 SE 16826 101st P1 SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Joseph Herr Christopher Herr Ashlynn & Dale Dawson Phillip Johnson 10019 SE 168th Ct 10023 SE 168th Ct 930 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Gilbert Wan Richard Johnson Michael Lee Smith 10036 SE 169th P1 918 S 32nd St 10028 SE 169th P1 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Raymond Law Phuc Tran & Ping Huang 10024 SE 169th P1 7216 33rd Ave S Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98118 q g-ozfo Shwu-jen Hwang 600 S.32nd PL,Renton,Washington 98055 DEVELt f445.p13/3.-25Q2.;G CITY OF RENT ON July 13, 1998 JUL 15 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning Development Services Division RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Extension of The Wells Ave. Stiegman 8 Lot Short Plat Dear Ms. Jennifer: Thank you for informing me about the schedule of Stiegman 8 Lot Short Plat. As I mentioned on our phone conversation I would like to have the Wells Avenue extended to the South. The main reason is for safety concern. It is safer to enter from Wells Ave.rather than from 34th St.for Lot 4. The Wells Ave.is a leveled and minor street for the community while the 34th St.is a steep and major traffic road. It would be harder to back up into the 34th St.from the residential drive way and accidents are more likely to occur. For family with little kids who would live in Lot 4,it is also safer for the kids if the front yard is adjacent to the Wells Ave.rather than the 34th St.since one is a leveled and side street while the other is a steep and busy street. For the safety reason,I strongly recommend that the city requests the developer to extend the Wells Ave. street to the South to acconmiodate the entry drive to Lot 4. I greatly appreciate your time and effort as you review my letter. If you have any question, please feel free to call me at (425) 430-2502. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, .3/ Shwu jen Hwang Enclosure: Noted Site Plan ,/v-P -tnos . Javils .e7 8 Avoliplils • 'A srigitt do fiaMeirvi 1 r _ _ YLc ›fo/vik 4/1fb' Q 13T 6 4 WlYlos r-. 31YL o1 '94e 5-7-79►'I �o s '34b 57I3M (v915/1/31)'a dAlaWW00321 -fi J 7 1No * rt , N 2° . ( 4Nb44.3a1..5 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1ti 1998 RECEIVED STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION The proposed short plat will dedicate the necessary right-of-way within this property to construct a portion of a potential neighborhood connector road west to Talbot Road. The actual road construction will occur upon the development of adjacent parcels, particularly to the west_ A potential plat development scheme for some adjacent parcels to the south and west has been produced and reviewed with City Staff. This potential layout along with the location of the existing sanitary sewer and storm drainage trunk pipelines have resulted in the proposed dedication shown on the preliminary short plat map. The proposed right-of-way will cross several wetland areas. A potential plan for the replacement of the lost wetlands has been shown on the aforementioned future plat layout. In any case, there is sufficient property on this parcel alone to recreate lost wetland areas of necessary. The width of the proposed right-of-ways is less than the standard City widths because it will allow for less of a loss of wetlands. The widths as shown has been reviewed by the City Public Works Department. The right-of-way dedication will cross approximately 4200 SF of designated wetland area. This area is based on a 42 ft. wide right-of-way. The proposed wetland creation area on the adjacent property to the south, (Stoop's property) is in excess to 50.000 SF. This area has been reviewed by our wetland consultant and declared as viable area for wetland creation_ In the event that this adjacent parcel is not available, there is over 30,000 SF of non-wetland (or buffer) area on this property (adjacent to existing wetlands) that can be used for wetlands replacement. t .r it I411114„,,, 4,44 �� B-twelve Associates Inc. 1.: IRpI 1 103 W. Meeker St. (v)253-859-0515 " tlllp�" Illy Suite C (f)253-852-4732 Kent,WA 98032-5751 (e)bl2assoc@compuserve.com CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED June 16, 1998 JUN 18 1998 BUILDING DIVISION City of Renton Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Steigman Property B-twelve Job#96-137 This letter is to verify the potential mitigation area for any wetland impacts occurring on the Steigman property. I have reviewed and delineated wetlands on the property immediately to the south (owned by Laura Stoops) and there is adequate and appropriate areas available for the creation of additional wetland area. The ideal portion of the Stoops property for this work is the west and south sides in the vicinity of the old mine portals. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates, Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist File: Ed/96137-02.doc Washington State Northwest Region •, Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: April 3, 1998 CITY OF RENTON APR 14 1998 TO: Jennifer toth Henning City of Renton, Project Manager RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 515 MP 1.25 CS 1763 Notice of Application-Stiegman Short Plat 4.99 acres into 8 residential lots File No.LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which at Wells Avenue South and south of 32nd Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name •• CIT1 )F RENTON sal/ ,: , Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator RECEI\'ED March 25, 1998 MAR 3.0 '98 OFF,CE SUPERINTENDEr, Superintendent's Office Renton School District#403 435 Main Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for an 8-lot short plat to be located on a vacant 4.99 acre parcel of land which is zoned R-8 (Residential - 8 DU/AC). The property is generally located east of Talbot Road South, West of S.R. 515, on Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to the Development Services Division, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Elementary School: Talbot Hill Middle School: Dimmitt High School: Renton or Lindbergh (see comments) Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes x No Any Comments: 97/98 — 9th & 10th attend Renton, llth & 12th attend Lindbergh; 98/99 — 9th—llth attend Renton, 12th attend Lindbergh; 99/00 and beyond attend Renton Thank you for providing this important information. Sincerely, Cs, ff0-4\ � n DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Jennifer Toth Henning APR U 3 1998 Project Manager RECEIVED school/ /kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer UA .ti'1'Y 1J , i NOTICE OF APPLICATION ****REVISED'*** PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 25,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF/STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DESCRIPTION: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8)residential lots. Six of the parcels would be about 6,000 sq.ft in size,one would be 9,500 Wt.and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and shod plat approval. GENERAL LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,South of 32nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Wetlands Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Shod Plat(SHPL-H) • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning.Project Manager. Development Services Division.200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.by 5:00 PM on April 27,1998.This mailer is also scheduled for a public hearing on May 5.1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South.If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division. (425)277.5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)277-6186.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 20,1 998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MARCH 03,1998.REVISED MARCH 25,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: MARCH 03,1998,REVISED MAjRCH25,1998 --'.I. ::::'t):::k. .-V,v'ik't,,t,--.::.---.'--.''''''. .. Ns,,,,,,,) ID life-. �is l I1 1; ' ' 1 '- .:;,.;11,i- .,tri ,.7.-.,;,..,1,-.•,,,.-, -- _.. . 1. _, :. - 44. : . ,.: -7 -' GENMALOTDOC CERTIFICATION I, Set if\d M ► run I-h , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ilik rat '2 19°18 • Signed: Stkihau , ►MVvvvti 1+ ATTEST: Subcribed and sw rn before me, a Nortary Public, in and Por the Stat of Washington residing in C 'O` , on the ��1 day of 0114441 l'q f 344(1&6)(1.&?- 11- Z/�VY� �3 �' 1Ver0�' NOTICE OF APPLICATION ****REVISED**** PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 25, 1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. J PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF / STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DESCRIPTION: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots. Six of the parcels would be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size,one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the.other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. GENERAL LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,South of 32nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Wetlands Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Short Plat(SHPL-H) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on April 27,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on May 5,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, (425)277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 20,1 998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MARCH 03,1998,REVISED MARCH 25,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: MARCH 03, 1998,REVISED MARCH 25, 1998 I ‘ Ili . \elk:,i4':71.74..t.,,,, , ,i„ v-.-;,,,, ,,, .5,,Lid r,I f7', - � �> 1`N .ems,` .1,, "--,i' NOM EA t — "-.° --l.. ii1;', le,"1/1;,,...4....",i1....*, ' s' i,:,1'4,.„, - •1` + � a s' Yi j` :ins' .� .r�i M y, Y. rylQ,l � . �_ M � , , o- 3IzsI9 g._ � � AtV r: . :', fie,5.:1An �IT n{' II�., r •J R L • wi. FJ / 1:• r...., o ,• . GENMALOT.DOC _ 7 3., ' �'< „ -tk. CIT! OF RENTON mil. �' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 25, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent,WA 98031 SUBJECT: STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT (FILE NO. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF) Dear Mr. Jaeger: On March 3rd a letter was sent notifying you that the above-referenced land use application was complete and accepted for review. That same day we mailed notices to surrounding property owners and posted Notice of Application posters near your site, but could not find the required public notification sign. We notified you by telephone that the sign was either down or missing. We understand that you were away at the time, but you did contact us later and said that the sign had either fallen down, or was hidden behind a construction vehicle. We later confirmed that the sign was knocked down. Since the required sign was not properly installed on the site, the Stiegman land use application was placed on hold. And, the dates tentatively scheduled with the City's Environmental Review Committee and Hearing Examiner were canceled. According to your telephone message today, the sign has now been reinstalled. The "hold” has been removed from your application and we will again post the site. We have tentatively re- scheduled your project with the Environmental Review Committee for April 7, 1998. The date of Tuesday, May 5, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above- reference matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required o be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to your one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425) 277-6186. Sincerely, -01("14./ (-1-6141/it Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. Walter Stiegman • H:1DI V I S ION.S\DE VELO P.S E R\DE V&PLAN.IN G\P ROJECTS198-026.JTHIACCPT2.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ' , CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Sonja J. Fesser t"% SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Note all existing easements,agreements, covenants, etc. of record on the drawing. Note the recording number of the street dedication on the drawing. The applicant's name and address needs to be noted on the preliminary drawing. Note all encroachments on the drawing. Information needed for final short plat document approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number (LUA-98-0260-SHPL)and the city's land record number (LND-20-0223) on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Provide the city with a Plat Certificate. Tie the subject property to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. See the attachment. The geometry will be checked when the final short plat document is submitted and said ties have been provided. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Note the quarter-section, section, township and range on the drawing in a title block, preferably located at the top and center of the drawing sheet. ✓ Remove the topog lines and all references to water mains, gas lines, sanitary sewers, fire hydrants, building set back lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\0223\RV980317.DOC\sf • March 16, 1998 Page 2 Addressing for the lots will be made available by the city as soon as possible. The addresses will need to be noted on the drawing. Under"Approvals," note that the City of Renton official signing the short plat document is the City of Renton Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Department!.Also include signature lines for the King County Assessor's Office. Note that if there are restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The short plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s)will be referenced on the short plat drawing in the appropriate location(s). Note what is set at the corners of the new lots. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used,per WAC 332-103-100. Include the basis of bearing,per WAC 332-130-050, 1.b.iii. Note the date the existing monuments were visited,per WAC 332-103-050-1.f.iv. The property owners' signatures need to be notarized (include notary block), and preceded with a certification block. Note whether the properties to the West and South of the subject property are platted(give name and lot number)or unplatted. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for the preliminary review is attached for your use and information. PROPI Y SERVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SU VISIONS No. 98 -o 17 APPLI(ANT: S-+"I -},r}4,1-1 ) W -1- RECEIVED FROM (date) JOB AT DRESS: LLS fi 5. S-TH ST• (s�l'p+c I u�sp>`�)WO# 7 s.544 NATURE OF WORK: f3 �o -p �el-I>�M N,1.SHer� pl LND# Zr.)-022, PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BV LONG PLAT, NEED MORE ORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTIC SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#ts ❑ VICINITY MAP El FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE 6, SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 2g sac. 5-90An [ NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the in.ent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon developm4 nt of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-sit improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinance, and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please not that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit applicatior. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lod/ will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Lateco ner Agreement(pvt) WATER _o_ Lateco ner Agreement(pvt) WASTEWATER -o - Latecom ner Agreement(pvt)OTHER -0 _ `'1 't'1 _ SA7j 840� i4 Special Assessment District/WATER _o - Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER /a _ Joint Ue Agreement(METRO) -© Local I nprovement District « _0 Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTUP E OBLIGATIONS -o- SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x f3 6,,8CDO.Gx) Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x CommerciaUlndustrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated to15- 0 Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd Eto SY cr��Ic Single family residential$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq. ft. of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER El Estimated 0 Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd Single flintily residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x g 6 5,080•�c� All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ 9,a8a.Od t:1?fh_) 3/ZA./� ono Signatt- of R ewing Authority D TE t ❑ *If subect property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. Q ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. S. ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to c:/template/fceapp1/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506, 4507, 4508.4525, and 4526 € 5JZO 1 n �\ �.._ i1 5L 1(st 5t 'i —ii ;t 2 p i � , 895 __ SE 161st St CITY OF RENTON 1•.•.): ;--\ �'� > 1p SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK 't ��, t¥' SE 1 2ri St W I I LEGEND 25th ST 1; t ,_a`% {1 I ¢ "- i 1 ....;``,' ,': 1.< ` ",+..„•,..•••^'---3 5 ' „L_, 2I it SE ��`�`,- 16 `_f�wj, lij SE 164th St -- ` - 1111 �, - �__ \,0:1,.-{ (icy f �_.._.._27th St _ v .._- t---w. _ _ .. S 1. SE ,,:, ((`' ` Horizontal Se Vertical } r t 1 7. �}�� \. \��Pd t L N NII fir . w Nr: 2222 N :, `- ',--; 9.0.4. '11,A 1j ``` `S o >! > Q Lii a� Horizontal Only 1$62 �": \ ��, in}i,� 4 7 `D1 I 3333 o S ' 3.1st 1 1 8$3 a...,,� S w 1 eel _...@ S 32nd St �- ' '� 1 W j f t....__.._ -!i SE68th .-I VerticalOnly irie+f _. _...._ and PI U1- __c > - >I! =t, ' 1r Q <1‘7,11 li SE 169th St li ;�� t r� il __ f \\)6i . Li -17;` `i J \$ � SE 172nd Sty-+ ! "' , s # r i t.) f .f r 4., r, ,.,,,,\ ; 0 650 1300 -it ib ` 1866 1:7,800 a `� __..._.... Petrovitsk� Rd SE Y I�` / ,- a.' - �— G>� O.n TECHNICAL SERVICES •• ' 2194 r.... ... ._ _ + Piairw TECHNICAL SERVICES I �' w 139 w .t 1: o ovioigr i 4� i N W i? N , W f W ;: . ' Nz 5329 5332 • SECTION 29 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 230 NW Corner 29 T23N R5E Location: Found a copper tack in lead on a concrete post monument down 0.5' in a monument case at the constructed center of a cul-de-sac on the east end of S 23rd Street, west of Benson Drive SE, near the northeast corner of Teasdale Park. See City of Renton monument reference card number 230. Monument: LEAD PLUG & CU TK ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.5' (MRC-230) NORTHING: 51991.494 EASTING: 396406.222 ELEVATION: 70.334 895 N 1/4 Corner 29 T23N R5E Location: Found a 3" domed brass disc stamped "Townsend & Assoc. LS 9634" flush with the asphalt pavement 2.5' southerly of the constructed centerline of Jones Place SE at the centerline of the overhead crossing transmission lines. Monument: 3 IN BRASS DOME W/ [X] [TOWNSEND & ASSOC LS 9634], FLUSH NORTHING: 52031.294 FASTING: 397209.253 ELEVATION: 124.625 1640 NW Corner 28 T23N R5E Location: Found a standard King County Survey 3" brass disc with a punch mark stamped "King County Survey monument" on a concrete post monument down 1.0' in a monument case in the constructed centerline of 116th Avenue SE at the northerly margin of an east-west water pipeline right-of-way. Monument: 3 IN BRASS DISC W/PUNCH ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 1.0' NORTHING: 52013.912 EASTING: 398019.532 ELEVATION: 142.063 5329-1 SECTION 29 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1862 Location: Found a copper plug with a punch mark on a 4"x4" concrete post monument down 0.45' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of S 31st Street & Smithers Court S. This monument is an alternate to the corner commonument to sections 29 & 30,T23N, R5E. Monument: CU PLUG W/PUNCH ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.45' NORTHING: 51223.575 EASTING: 396301.427 ELEVATION: 1863 W 1/4 Corner 28 T23N R5E Location: Found a 1/8" copper pin on a concrete post monument down 1.1' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of SE 168th Street & 116th Avenue SE. Monument: 1/8 IN CU PIN ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 1.1' NORTHING: 51203.339 EASTING: 397994.264 ELEVATION: 139.927 1866 N 1/4 Corner 32 T23N R5E Location: Found a plug on the old concrete street surface down 0.4' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of SE 176th Street& Benson Road. Monument: PLUG ON CONC, IN CASE, DN. 0.4' NORTHING: 50416.733 EASTING: 397160.915 ELEVATION: 5329-2 SECTION 29 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1915 Location: Top of copper plug set in concrete filled 3" pipe in WSDOT case at back of curb on west side of Benson Road. Monument: COPPER PLUG IN CONC FILLED PIPE WSDOT CASE NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 116.087 1916 Location: Top of copper plug set in concrete filled 3" pipe in WSDOT case in centerline of concrete walk on west side of Benson Rd. S., 250' north of intersection with S. 27th Place. Monument: COPPER PLUG IN CONC FILLED PIPE WSDOT CASE NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 76.298 2110 Location: Found an 1/8" brass pin on a 3" concrete post monument down 0.4' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of SE 176th Street (SE Petrovitsky Road) & 116th Avenue SE. Monument: 1/8" BRASS PIN IN 3 IN CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.4' NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 136.600 2139 Location: 3" brass disk stamped "KC-F-8A 1993" in light standard base on east side of 108th Ave. S.E. in front of Al's Auto Supply Store. Monument: BRASS DISC IN LIGHT STANDARD BASE NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 122.223 5329-3 • SECTION 29 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 2140 Location: 3" brass disk stamped "KC-F-7 1993" in concrete walk on north side of S.E. 192nd Street in front of HSE. No. 11406. Monument: BRASS SURFACE DISC NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 154.981 5329-4 5319 c 1 T t t c 1 C i f i f�.-r ; r :` 1161 t 23rd St lb CITY OF RENTON SW 23rd Stlito 1551 �- 0:1 j 'i - ... _ �-_._^ SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK mil ' 1160 t i r-' i /`�EE ; ( _, `, LEGEND Q# c ! =i i �tIf I .i : = °'j'• EEi t t � S 25th ST a f ,, f ��tir:�* ti t 1111 St ( SW 27th St t '— ` t st �, �:� _ �x �•t "� —~�--_ '= 1697 ='1 2 th `1ir ' � \ • Horizontal & Vertical 1545 ' 0 3 ii / \ 2222 11 s; i r___---J �-, 1 i SW 29th $ I i /43 `,`� ! Horizontal Only t ;; t 1C2 r 3333 SW 30th St j 1 i :;,� 5. 31 st . „3 �n in f-„ _.. 1861` j 14943 , S 32nd St N Vertical Only 4 �, : ° i \ _ S 32nd PI �;-,\_. NO I - . N)7o -`-:`,.':::::"''' !; E I i .i!. I I oi 1 $t - i ! ln __._ _ _. . ___. .. .SW 34th St I I f 11N _ ._., r,...._.._....__.. _......_..-__ ,1544 f 1 1. r i f 1 1 ��/iS36th #tv) t >. fit/ #f >s# t i _ `-' 1.1S 37th St``v t# r 1864 SW 39th ! t 1300 " ; 6 5 O 1I 1 s S' f f f-.. "- _ .�. ` Y 1:7,800 f s i • t t i i _________ p 0.n TECHNICAL SERVICES )t f II SW 41St St - I i s ♦ ♦ PB/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES ...._ 41 ' ccNTo ovloigr ., --. r_... _ .. 5331 5330 SECTION 30 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 230 NW Corner 29 T23N R5E Location: Found a copper tack in lead on a concrete post monument down 0.5' in a monument case at the constructed center of a cul-de-sac on the east end of S 23rd Street, west of Benson Drive SE, near the northeast corner of Teesdale Park. See City of Renton monument reference card number 230. Monument: LEAD PLUG & CU TK ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.5' (MRC-230) NORTHING: 51991.494 EASTING: 396406.222 ELE'v A r ION: 70.334 1160 N 1/4 Corner 30 T23N R5E Location: Found a 1/2" bronze button with a punch on a concrete post monument down 0.3' in a monument case approximately 6' east of the constructed centerline of East Valley Highway at the northerly margin of an east-west pipeline right- of-way. Another monument (found a copper tack in lead on a concrete post monument down 1.0' in a monument case) exists approximately 6'west in the constructed centerline of East Valley Highway. Monument: 1/2 IN BRONZE BUTTON W/ PUNCH ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.3' NORTHING: 51991.935 EASTING: 395595.663 ELEVATION: 5.743 1161 NW Corner 30 T23N R5E Location: Found a 3" pipe 1.0' tall 900'west of Lind Ave SE on pipeline R.O.W. west from the extension of SW 23rd St. on east side of creek. Monument: CAPPED 3 IN IRON PIPE WITH [X] NORTHING: 51993.586 EASTING: 394884.710 ELEVATION:. 5330-1 • SECTION 30 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1241 Location: Found Tack in Lead in concrete-filled 21/2" iron pipe down 0.5' in a monument case approximately 200' south of the intersection of SW 41 st Street and East Valley Road. Monument: TK IN LEAD IN CONC FILLED 2-1/2 IN I.P., IN CASE, DN.0.5' NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 6.936 1494 Location: Top of 1 3/4" brass disk in concrete monument in case in centerline of Talbot Road, opposite house No. 3023, 55' north of the centerline of S. 168th Street. Monument: BRASS DISC IN CONC MON IN CASE NORTHING: 51172.894 EASTING: 396024.600 ELEVATION: 30.321 1522 Location: Top of 2" brass disk set in concrete monument at intersection of Talbot Road South and South 38th Court. Monument: BRASS DISC IN CONC MON INT TALBOT RD S AND S 38TH CT NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 28.825 1544 Location: Top of 2" brass disk set in cased concrete monument at intersection of E. Valley Road and S.W. 34th Street. Monument: BRASS DISC IN CASED CONC MON INT E VALLEY RD & SW 34TH STREET NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 6.022 5330-2 SECTION 30 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1545 Location: Top of 2" brass disk set in concrete monument at intersection of E. Valley Road and SW 27th Street. Monument: BRASS DISC IN CONC MON INT E VALLEY RD & SW 27TH STREET NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 5.400 1551 Location: Found 3/8" brass plug in a 10" monument case in centerline of Lind Ave SW at SW 23rd. St. (pipeline R.O.W.) Monument: 3/8 IN BRASS PLUG IN MON CASE NORTHING: 51992.882 EASTING: 395190.593 ELEVATION: 6.497 1697 Location: Top of 2" brass disk set in concrete monument in centerline of Talbot Road 155' south of intersection of Talbot Road and South 27th Place. Monument: BRASS DISC IN CONC MON CL TALBOT RD SO OF S 27TH PLACE NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 31.894 1699 Location: Top of 1 3/4" brass disk in concrete monument in case in centerline of Talbot Road, opposite driveway to House No. 2819 Monument: BRASS DISC IN CONC MON IN CASE CL TALBOT RD OPPOSITE HOUSE 2819 NORTHING: 51437.721 EASTING: 395997.313 ELEVATION: 30.278 5330-3 SECTION 30 T23N R5E W.M. 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1861 Location: Found a 3/8" brass plug and a punch mark on a 4"x4"concrete post monument down 0.3' in a monument case in the constructed centerline of Lind Avenue SE approximately 30' north of the north building line of the Quality Classics building at 3000 East Valley Highway. This mark is an alternate to the center of 30-23-5E. There is another monument with similar description approximately 34' southerly on the constructed centerline of East Valley Highway. Monument: 3/8 IN BRASS PLUG W/PUNCH ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.3' NORTHING: 51202.305 EASTING: 395168.555 ELEVATION: 6.096 1862 Location: Found a copper plug with a punch mark on a 4"x4" concrete post monument down 0.45' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of S 31 st Street& Smithers Court S. This monument is an alternate to the corner commonument to sections 29 & 30,T23N, R5E. Monument: CU PLUG W/PUNCH ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN. 0.45' NORTHING: 51223.575 EASTING: 396301.427 ELEVATION: 1864 Location: Found a 2" flat brass disc with "X" stamped "Mullen 18913" on a 4"x4" concrete post monument down 0.06' in a monument case at the constructed intersection of SW 39th Street& Raymonumentd Avenue SW. Monument: 2 IN BRASS DISC W/[X] ON CONC MON, IN CASE, DN 0.06' NORTHING: 50495.104 EASTING: 394836.553 ELEVATION: 5.940 5330-4 - ♦.. SECTION 30 T23N R5E W.M, 24-Oct-96 Horizontal: NAD 1983/91 Meters Vertical: NAVD 1988 Meters 1916 Location: Top of copper plug set in concrete filled 3" pipe in WSDOT case in centerline of concrete walk on west side of Benson Rd. S., 250' north of intersection with S. 27th Place. Monument: COPPER PLUG IN CONC FILLED PIPE WSDOT CASE NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 76.298 1925 Location: Top of N.E. bolt of traffic signal base S.E. quadrant of intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. Monument: NE BOLT TRAFFIC SIGNAL BASE INT SW 39TH & LIND AVE SW NORTHING: EASTING: ELEVATION: 6.208 5330-5 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Da?: March 18, 1998 To: Jennifer Henning Fran: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review .w Sul ject: Stiegman Short Plat LUA-98-026, SHPL-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WA TER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water extension in Wells Ave South. A fire hydrant and all meters boxes to serve the proposed homesites are installed. SEWER - Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by Soos Creek Public Utilities. An extension in Wells Avenue South has been provided for this short plat. STORM - A proposed storm system hook up to the existing storm line in the easement on this property has been constructed. The system and report conform to the standards set in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There are existing wetlands on the site. STF EETS - Sidewalks, curb, gutter, streetlighting and pavement have been constructed to City of Renton standards. CO[)E REQUIREMENTS WA—ER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $850 per single family site. This fee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. SAN ITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate determined by Soos Creek Public Utilities. A letter of availability shall be required prior to recording of the short plat. SUF FACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the rate of $385 per single family site. This ee is payable prior to recording of the short plat. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed at a single family rate of 9.55 trips per homesite. Total fee for 8 lots is $5,730. 2. Dedication of additional right-of-way and, possibly, street improvements to provide future access to the southern and western edges of the short plat is required. The dedications are critical to develop an alternate access to Talbot Road for the neighborhood. Waivers and/or modifications can be requested for the street improvements for the proposed dedications through the Board of Public Works. STIEGF.)OC PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for any additional work in dedicated right of way. If no further work is required for this short plat, no construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. RE1:OMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to recording of the short plat. 3. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. CC: Neil Watts STIF_GF.JOC n r t� TPANSRQRT1 KTrY f pLVF Project Name Stir-eimavt Short Ftgt Project Address U)c 11 i S d 5 3 L -th • S1 Contact Person -Jame) Uutc'av Address Phone Number 253 - S5U - Da 34. • Permit Number L U,k - er t-o 2 (o Project Description S fA S('iovt pica- . Land Use ype: , Method of Calculation: _ Residential ["ITE Trip Generation Manual 17 ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study 5iN91tfawily (_Z10 ❑ Non-retail 0 Other pc`1.e. Z 5 g • • R«Ze. : R,55 1.04 Iv" Calculation: >J tr'e = ($) (q.55) = 7(.0. tYIPS At 175 <um t VIP (74 .4 )t$75 ) _ $ 5730. °° • 00 Transportation Mitigation Fee: 573Q• Calculated by: Oa Walt- Date: 3/5/9g Account Number: 105. 561q. 3)80, 70. OD. Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P .Iew W6-ter COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATIC N NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER i`}fef�fi4* •PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 11.1 i 04 1U98 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres l BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A.d+11..uuvta DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels woul i be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRI)NMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of thi Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resoui es Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIC RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \ dOud 7)fro We have ved this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition it information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Lti1,0 3I1'1)11t' Signature of Di•ector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIPONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:si{at..e.IJc� u) er COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATI N NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT T ILE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 cm'or REM�N LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A MAP n 98 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels woul i be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres.`0-ategatryr41,jrril icav wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and approval. A. ENVIRI)NMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of thi Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental-lealth Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resous;es Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIC(-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Leh iv A-ry cX 4 qt3)61.g We have Ned this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. si olcd Signature of D rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT-T1nA4)pAb COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTFFNTON PROJECT T:TLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street IerAr( 3 199 SITE AREA: 4.99 acres 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A 3l.lilL jiimV LII, iv SUMMARY )F PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels wou d be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands arE found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of th a Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation LancUShorelin3 Use Utilities Animals Transportation' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resot roes Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. 'POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. RELATED COMMENTS We have dewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3/iblc� b Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 9RN pON^FnR RIDEI. cell City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works �"�� ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEdit i-O `fg98 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -FG F'P IY ,�W�-hpyk COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 `-E VPr, APPLICATIC N NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT T TLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels woul i be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIR')NMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of thi Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation' Environmental-lealth Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resoui;es Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000Feeet' ,1 p 20 a 0 r ;i: ,Y e,c.l 5 10Ole) B. POLIC '-RELATED COMMENTS NA C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \ i �,.' / F � c ad war-en �s 'I(1161e/ We have .ved this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition m Information is ne)d to properly assess this proposal. r VIV, Signature of Di ector or Authorized Repre entative Date DEVAPP.DOC\-' Rev.10/93 ry O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - N�o MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat, S 32nd nd t. 86 Wells Av. S Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single family structures. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Lor v t+Air..h6h Seni(cc 4 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TQTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 47y0FRENToN L CATION: Wells SIOTE AREA: 4.99 acres Avenue South, South of 32nd Street BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A 1998 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) resfth fi1iai Ip ;4j Qf the parcels would be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Categor FRAidNII wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandiShorelin a Use Utilities Animals Transportation, Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ NistoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 61,,:ti C. CODE.-RELATED COMMENTS Alt) ctA4 rwtr=iv7.5 We have rev ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itic nal information is needed to roperly assess this proposal. 3 44-/..4'7 S atur of Dire r or Authorized ReP rese nta$ve Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWINC DEPARTMENT: 1'bktce, COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT T'TLE: Stiegman Short Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA: 4.99 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels woul i be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIR 7NMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of th r Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorelim Use Utilities Animals Transportation' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resou ces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 1 22 ,?z ct )a)/t ..., B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additior al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 14/7c i < /%74.11eJ 3-67A —`�e. Signature of C irector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `pt COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 03, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr. James Jaeger PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT l ITLE: Stiegman Short Plat _ WORK ORDER NO: 78344 LOCATION: Wells Avenue South, South of 32nd Street SITE AREA 4.99 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8) residential lots. Six of the parcels would be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands ara found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. A. ENVIF ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of ti e Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glam Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ms 7 ) a7 B. 7.2Y-RELATED COMMENTS , 1/761 S spa C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re✓iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh it onal information is need o properly assess this proposal. Signature o Director or Author' ed resentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 c: © CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works . . •,- = ....."";; 7 CC 1. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 to MA 0 4'0 8 ?AIM E 0 2 9 g ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED W�rE P �f t l {� ` �.3 O.S.-��.. ! 7�'b1 l�S:'p0$f'AGE • 1\A1 Gilbert Wan .,,1PP 11 10036 SE 169th P1 h Renton WA 98058 MT IER_A$LE :-1 ' b6/ AS m...,,ESSED _ wry vi -� WIABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER W dld''(r) rye lsue' it „ © CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public WorksTI. -mil Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 cocc cc Ail 0 4'� a 2 g 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 10 • 0. 05 .9 - E , ' ,g u sEA°sariaE t .,r1ao '�o rl i NU4`i,„, --. 4'0 ..- kft)11- /1/4. 22Ming Em : an Yu Hoqui. e son Ave 6 441 985 1 7 J I AuTP5t'ar ` ' ! a Iliiiiliiliiliii{IiiiiiiiiiiiiIi„Hill{iiiiiiIiiitil ieiltf $ © CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works 4 • ' "`;-�-�`•r 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 N MR4'9 �jfj Q ,2 9 ' ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED F - O.S -?lt- P t n g 4:i.kol#aae il • et h *.i)j LANG CONS TR�f9/ ONE %`ASSO PO Box 23998 °9 OO $44 Federal Way WA 9:.41:SSF4. '%p40' O % w CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site...;: PROJECT NAME: Sf \O t Ii o APF L CA 10NN' I T : L • I • 7� . St^PI- (-t C O. l}A Le The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER J2� ojf izk-A e--01 ee t cF.C !VEf ; " 2 C1 1998 17Ed CITYNOF RENTONNING (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, Jo.X'ne5 Z0.,e.C)e. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) �l owners and their addresses were obtained from: • 0 City of Renton Technical Services Recor` M. `A, r'� .. Title Company Records �` sioF�n � 0 King County Assessors Records f i,° OTAR y a •', '?' Signed Date :'' .7/ le �ppli t) 'i1PUt � NOTARY - Al TESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, re: iding at /� ),L/WJ ic% on the p iay of �A i f,. 19' Signed �� � 4�A ,I ''1 e (Notary Public) _ *t*;For City of Renton Use • CERTIFICATION OF MAILING 1,4 S. • d,hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) ea:h listed property owner on Signed 1 . .. Date: 3 4 6 • NOTARY R ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a NotaryPublic, in and for the State of Washin ton residing atf 6. l 'A on they'.', •Say of _ `/c..C'./„., 19 T . `Signed )(A_A- MARILYN KAM CHEFF REV min COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 .... CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 111111111111 lIST :OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS .::::�>::::>:` .... . within 300 feet of;the subject site PROJECT NAME: S'l .YY1O 'c \e 4 f1t APPLICATION NO: The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER h . ' __cup--; 4. t� 't.n'gtr 4� ee- o, 'a-cAn e-01 ee-ts- i lAY.IIRAM y t 'sX I tMl'(Attach additional sheets, if necessary) 1 Tieth-Ming Cheng Max Frazier UC & D INC 11510 17th Ave NE 3340 Talbot Rd S 4121 15th Ave S Seattle WA 98125 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98108 Ricardo Lockhart Natalie Lockhart Joseph & Carol Walker Milton & Linda Grantham 9907 S 169th P1 9911 S 169th P1 9915 S 169th P1 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Mike & Lily Luu Dawn Thorsness Shang Yen & Diana Yuen 9919 S 169th P1 729 S 32nd St 731 S032nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Billy Dang Clayton & Deanna Calhoun Alan Fessell 737 S 32nd St 9934 S 169th P1 734 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Chun Hong Yan John & Lizabeth Cesare Wai Fun To Ms Thornton 728 S 32nd St 720 S 32nd St 712 S32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 George Deeney David Miyatake Susan Gregorios L B Vicki Albert & Cathlee King 706 S 32nd St 9917 S 168th P1 9921 S 168th P1 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 William & Hisami Hoglund 9925 S 168th P1 Renton WA 98055 • Laura (Tr) Gannon LANG CONSTRUCTION & ASSO John & Kathi Hipp 16749 Addison St PO Box 23998 3451 Cedar Ave S Encino CA 91436 Federal Way WA 98093 Renton WA 98055 Fang Ming & Yan Yu - Deborah Hansen Robbin & Mary Hoppe 220 W Emerson Ave #6 10009 SE 169th P1 10013 SE 169th P1 Hoquiam WA 98550 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Douglas & Maria Nelson Robert & Lucy Scoverski Kevin & Sue Ung 819 S 32nd St 10021 SE 169th P1 907 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Benjamin Greene John & Nana Wong Chau Sheryl Anderson 1715 Market St #104 919 S 32nd St 120 Longwater Dr Kirkland WA 98033 Renton WA 98055 Norwell MA 02061 David & Marilyn Guerra Joan Edmonds Rufino Merca 10041 SE 169th P1 3206 Wells Ave S ' 16908 101st P1 SE Renton WA 98058 Rentoi WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Harrison Lau & Anna Au Georgette Levesque Thomas & Brenda Rossman 3142 Wells Ave S 3136 Wells Ave S 3130 Wells Ave S Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Theodore Harder Oliver & Emma Udani Roger & Loreta Habon Crossley Harder 16838 101st P1 SE 16832 101st P1 SE 16826 101st P1 SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Joseph Herr Christopher Herr Ashlynn & Dale Dawson Phillip Johnson 10019 SE 168th Ct 10023 SE 168th Ct 930 S 32nd St Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Gilbert Wan Richard Johnson Michael Lee Smith 10036 SE 169th P1 918 S 32nd St 10028 SE 169th P1 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Raymond Law Phuc Tran & Ping Huang 10024 SE 169th P1 7216 33rd Ave S Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98118 * . MetroScan/King : * Owner: CHENG TIETH-MING Parcel # : 302305 9021 08 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 01/12/90 Mail : 11510 17TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98125 Sale Price: $150, 000 Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $66, 100 YB: Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 21 POR S 1/2 OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac : 3 . 13 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : * Owner: FRAZIER MAX L Parcel # : 302305 9022 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail : 3340 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $38, 000 YB: Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :STR 302305 TAXLOT 22 E 218 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac : 1 . 16 Ph: 206-228-8082 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner : FRAZIER MAX L Parcel # : 302305 9071 07 Site : 3340 TALBOT RD S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 3340 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $142 , 800 YB : 1963 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :STR 302305 TAXLOT 71 POR OF E 1/2 Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 2, 940 Ac : 1 . 78 Ph: 206-228-8082 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:UC & D INC Parcel # : 302305 9108 04 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 12/30/96 Mail : 4121 15TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98108 Sale Price : $110, 000 Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $58, 600 YB: Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :STR 302305 TAXLOT 108 LOT 2 KC Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac : 2 . 66 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : * Owner: LOCKHART RICARDO & NATALIE M Parcel # : 948575 0070 00 Site : 709 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 10/13/89 Mail : 9907 S 169TH PL RENTON WA 98058 Sale Price : $153 , 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $165, 200 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 7 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2, 560 Ac : . 13 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:WALKER JOSEPH B & CAROL G Parcel # : 948575 0080 08 Site : 715 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 08/10/89 Mail : 9911 S 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $134 , 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $151, 500 YB: 1989 Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 8 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 8th F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 930 Ac : . 10 Ph: 206-235-0375 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GRANTHAM MILTON W & LINDA L Parcel # : 948575 0090 06 Site : 719 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/28/89 Mail : 9915 S 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $146, 503 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157, 900 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 9 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2, 230 Ac : . 10 Ph: � tLl <�)v\ Il.-I ft C> C) 1- .SUAk0).Lit d)l,; I ( .:7)0() C0 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • *. : MetroScan/King : Owner: LUU MIKE U & LILY N Parcel # : 948575 0100 04 Site : 723 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 09/25/89 Mail : 9919 S 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $147 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157, 800 YB: 1989 Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 10 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 970 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:THORSNESS DAWN Parcel # : 948575 0110 02 Site : 729 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/11/93 Mail : 729 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $143 , 400 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 11 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 680 Ac : . 14 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:YUEN SHANG YEN & DIANA Parcel # : 948575 0120 00 Site : 731 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/15/89 Mail : 731 S032ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $170, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $166, 600 YB: 1989 Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 12 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF:2 , 610 Ac : . 17 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:DANG BILLY Parcel # : 948575 0130 08 Site : 737 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 01/19/90 Mail : 737 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $143 , 196 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157 , 300 YB: 1989 Q: SE 5 : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 13 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 220 Ac : . 20 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:CALHOUN CLAYTON H & DEANNA M Parcel # : 948575 0150 03 Site : 740 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/16/93 Mail : 9934 S 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $174, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $143 , 400 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 15 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 1, 680 Ac : . 12 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner: FESSELL ALAN T Parcel # : 948575 0160 01 Site : 734 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 11/30/89 Mail : 734 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $142 , 307 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $147, 700 YB: 1989 Q:SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 16 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 760 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner :CESARE JOHN J & LIZABETH W Parcel # : 948575 0170 09 Site : 728 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/27/95 Mail : 728 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $166, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $152 , 900 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 17 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 010 Ac : . 12 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • • : MetroScan/King : Owner:YAN CHUN HONG;TO WAI FUN CARMEN Parcel # : 948575 0180 07 Site : 720 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/15/97 Mail : 720 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $205 , 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157, 900 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 18 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 230 Ac : . 13 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:THORNTON MS Parcel # : 948575 0190 05 Site : 712 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/15/95 Mail : 712 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $189, 950 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $167, 600 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 19 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 520 Ac : . 17 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:DEENEY GEORGE R;GREGORIOS SUSAN G Parcel # : 948575 0200 03 Site : 706 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/23/97 Mail : 706 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $204, 575 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157, 600 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 20 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 240 Ac : . 13 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MIYATAKE DAVID & VICKI L B Parcel # : 948575 0240 05 Site : 715 S 32ND PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/29/89 Mail : 9917 S 168TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $138, 830 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $149, 500 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 24 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 310 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KING ALBERT STEPHEN & CATHLEE Parcel # : 948575 0250 02 Site : 721 S 32ND PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/28/93 Mail : 9921 S 168TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $148, 700 YB: 1989 Q: SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 25 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2, 040 Ac : . 10 Ph: 206-271-4244 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOGLUND WILLIAM E & HISAMI S Parcel # : 948575 0260 00 Site : 727 S 32ND PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/10/93 Mail : 9925 S 168TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $184, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $162 , 500 YB: 1989 Q : SE S : 30 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 26 WINSPER DIV NO 01 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2, 510 Ac : . 12 Ph: 206-228-6056 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *- : MetroScan/King : Owner : LANG CONSTRUCTION & ASSOC Parcel # : 292305 9104 01 Site : 3401 BENSON DR S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 10/15/96 Mail : 1707 S 341ST PL #C FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Sale Price : $155 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $216 , 100 YB: 1975 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : STR 292305 TAXLOT 104 LOT 3 OF Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 400 Ac : 3 . 43 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:GANNON LAURA (TR) Parcel # : 292305 9123 08 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 04/12/91 Mail : 16749 ADDISON ST ENCINO CA 91436 Sale Price : Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $90, 000 YB: Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : STR 292305 TAXLOT 123 S 1/2 OF NW Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : B1dgSF: Ac : 5 . 06 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner : LANG CONSTRUCTION & ASSOC Parcel # : 292305 9124 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 01/25/96 Mail : PO BOX 23998 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 Sale Price : $150, 000 FULL Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $55 , 700 YB: Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 : STR 292305 TAXLOT 124 LOT 1 OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac : 2 . 47 Ph : * : MetroScan/King : Owner : HIPP JOHN L & KATHI L Parcel # : 292305 9161 01 Site : 3451 CEDAR AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/15/96 Mail : 3451 CEDAR AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $167, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $173 , 200 YB: 1959 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : STR 292305 TAXLOT 161 LOT 2 OF Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 3 , 240 Ac : 2 . 64 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner : LANG CONSTRUCTION & ASSOC Parcel # : 292305 9167 05 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 10/01/96 Mail : 1707 S 341ST PL #C FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Sale Price : $150 , 000 Use : 901 VACANT, RESIDENTIAL Asd.V: $46 , 700 YB: Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : STR 292305 TAXLOT 167 LOT 4 OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac : 1 . 87 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner: YU FANG MING & YAN Z Parcel # : 948576 0010 02 Site : 801 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/26/90 Mail : 220 W EMERSON AVE #6 HOQUTAM WA 98550 Sale Price : $160, 562 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $161, 700 YB: 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 1 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 960 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HANSEN DEBORAH L Parcel # : 948576 0020 00 Site : 807 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/23/94 Mail : 10009 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $170, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $155 , 400 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 2 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 800 Ac : . 12 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed . * MetroScan/King : * Owner:HOPPE ROBBIN D & MARY C Parcel # : 948576 0030 08 Site : 813 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/09/94 Mail : 10013 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $164 , 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157 , 100 YB : 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 3 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 820 Ac : . 12 Ph: 206-226-3435 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:NELSON DOUGLAS D & MARIA B Parcel # : 948576 0040 06 Site : 819 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/27/90 Mail : 819 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $185, 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $162 , 300 YB : 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 4 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 970 Ac : . 12 Ph: 206-228-5205 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner: SCOVERSKI ROBERT & LUCY M Parcel # : 948576 0050 03 Site : 901 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/13/92 Mail : 10021 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $157, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $144, 400 YB: 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lg1 :LOT 5 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 1, 390 Ac : . 11 Ph: 206-228-1790 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:UNG KEVIN Y & SUE H Parcel # : 948576 0060 01 Site : 907 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/12/90 Mail : 907 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $170, 647 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $161, 500 YB : 1990 Q: SW 5 : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : LOT 6 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF : 1, 950 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GREENE BENJAMIN J Parcel # : 948576 0070 09 Site : 913 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/24/90 Mail : 1715 MARKET ST #104 KIRKLAND WA 98033 Sale Price : $172 , 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157, 100 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 7 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 820 Ac : . 11 Ph: * - : MetroScan/King : * Owner:CHAU JOHN H & NANA WONG Parcel # : 948576 0080 07 Site : 919 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/20/92 Mail : 919 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $162 , 300 YB: 1990 Q: SW 5 : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 8 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 970 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:ANDERSON SHERYL L Parcel # : 948576 0090 05 Site : 925 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 02/28/96 Mail : 120 LONGWATER DR NORWELL MA 02061 Sale Price : $175, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $150, 000 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : LOT 9 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 740 Ac : . 11 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * : MetroScan/King : Owner :GUERRA DAVID A & MARILYN A Parcel # : 948576 0100 03 Site : 931 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/27/90 Mail : 10041 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98058 Sale Price: $193 , 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $171, 100 YB : 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 : LOT 10 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H : 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 370 Ac : . 12 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner : EDMONDS JOAN Parcel # : 948576 0110 01 Site : 3206 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/03/90 Mail : 3206 WELLS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $179, 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $155, 400 YB: 1990 Q: SW 5 : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 11 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 800 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MERCA RUFINO R Parcel # : 948576 0120 09 Site : 3200 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/30/93 Mail : 16908 101ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $175 , 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157 , 100 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 12 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1 , 820 Ac : . 10 Ph: 206-255-6954 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: LAU HARRISON & AU ANNA Y Parcel # : 948576 0130 07 Site : 3142 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/24/92 Mail : 3142 WELLS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $161, 700 YB: 1990 Q : SW 5 : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 13 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 960 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner : LEVESQUE GEORGETTE M Parcel # : 948576 0140 05 Site : 3136 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 10/18/90 Mail : 3136 WELLS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $195, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $172 , 900 YB: 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 14 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 370 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner :ROSSMAN THOMAS B & BRENDA K Parcel # : 948576 0150 02 Site : 3130 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/26/96 Mail : 3130 WELLS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $185, 500 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $168, 200 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : LOT 15 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 970 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:UDANI OLIVER A & UDANI EMMA Parcel # : 948576 0160 00 Site : 3124 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/02/90 Mail : 16838 101ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $214 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $161, 500 YB : 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 16 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 950 Ac : . 10 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed . *, - : MetroScan/King : Owner:HABON ROGER & LORETA A Parcel # : 948576 0170 08 Site : 3118 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/14/90 Mail : 16832 101ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $197 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $157 , 100 YB : 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 17 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 820 Ac : . 10 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HARDER THEODORE M & CROSSLEY Parcel # : 948576 0180 06 Site : 3112 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/19/90 Mail : 16826 101ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $167 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $155 , 400 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 : LOT 18 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 1, 800 Ac : . 10 Ph: 206-277-6819 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HERR JOSEPH D & CHRISTOPHER J Parcel # : 948576 0280 05 Site : 903 S 32ND PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/28/90 Mail : 10019 SE 168TH CT RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $173 , 902 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $167, 300 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : LOT 28 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2, 270 Ac : . 12 Ph: 206-271-6739 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:DAWSON ASHLYNN MARY & DALE D Parcel # : 948576 0290 03 Site : 909 S 32ND PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/31/92 Mail : 10023 SE 168TH CT RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $173 , 500 YB: 1990 Q : SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lg1 : LOT 29 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H : 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 260 Ac : . 12 Ph: 206-255-4493 * : MetroScan/King : Owner :JOHNSON PHILLIP H Parcel # : 948576 0330 05 Site : 930 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 10/24/96 Mail : 930 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $172 , 500 FULL Use : 101 RES , SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $153 , 600 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 : LOT 33 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 740 Ac : . 12 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WAN GILBERT K Parcel # : 948576 0340 03 Site : 924 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/03/90 Mail : 10036 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98058 Sale Price : $204 , 497 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $172 , 900 YB : 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 34 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 370 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner :JOHNSON RICHARD P Parcel # : 948576 0350 00 Site : 918 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/06/90 Mail : 918 S 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $163 , 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $173 , 500 YB : 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 35 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 B1dgSF: 2 , 260 Ac : . 11 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * : MetroScan/King : Owner : SMITH MICHAEL LEE Parcel # : 948576 0360 08 Site : 912 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/17/90 Mail : 10028 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $184, 902 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $153 , 600 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 36 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 1, 740 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner: LAW RAYMOND W Parcel # : 948576 0370 06 Site : 906 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/06/94 Mail : 10024 SE 169TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price : $184, 400 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $173 , 500 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R : 05E Lgl : LOT 37 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 260 Ac : . 11 Ph: * : MetroScan/King : Owner:TRAN PHUC G;HUANG PING C Parcel # : 948576 0380 04 Site : 900 S 32ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 04/25/97 Mail : 7216 33RD AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 Sale Price : $208 , 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $171, 100 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 29 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl : LOT 38 WINSPER DIV NO 02 Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 2/ /1 Stories : 2 BldgSF: 2 , 370 AC : . 11 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. rcy • .A..�� NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 03,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF/STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DESCRIPTION: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight(8)residential lots. Six of the parcels would be about 8,000 sq.ft.In size,one would be 9,500 sq.II.and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and Ill wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental review and short plat approval. GENERAL LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,South of 32nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Wetlands Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Short Plat(SHPL-H) • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South.Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on April 14.1998.This mailer is also scheduled for a public hearing on April 21,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about This proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)277-8186.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 20,1 998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MARCH 03,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: MARCH 03,1998 I. . . „t cott, rig {" 1 � N 1 tt,flr�l I r:,..-,,,,,,,I, ' 1 t 9ENLNLOT.DO0 CERTIFICATION I, 5q,vld,0 6'1 j I�h i-h , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • the described property on ma_rt-k 3 t i958 • • Signed: i' -i IMAvvt ,h ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and`for the State of Washington residing 6 ,(2,,,... , on the .3--? - day of '7)6....k. /yqk . --T)1 n-A-e-/• '' ))------ex----,--Yx-CAA-9-0 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • '' • 0 U A * ru 4. 'e�NTo, NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 03, 1998 A Master Applic ation has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly lescribes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF / STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT DESCRIPTION: Jim Jaeger has applied to subdivide a 4.99 acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots. Six of the l larcels would be about 6,000 sq.ft. in size, one would be 9,500 sq.ft. and the other would be 3.42 acres. Category II and III wetlands are found on the site. Access would be from Wells Avenue South. Proposal requires environmental n view and short plat approval. GENERAL LOCATION: Wells Avenue South,South of 32nd Street STUDIES REQI IRED/OR AVAILABLE: Wetlands Study PUBLIC APPRC:VALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Short Plat(SHPL-H) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development SE rvices Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on April 14,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on April 21,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mi I Ave. South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, (425)277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCL JDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 20,1 998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MARCH 03, 1998 DATE OF NOTI:E OF APPLICATION: MARCH 03, 1998 j. ''. �q 4 4-i. ` r _is I8.A ' i;'_ 4 s LL `o :• i�1- III 1s---- 1 - Q O, . -'�..t.V,F 1• • •:h III t "' ';f;`*I;• :.,%, � O '� 41 [[.tL a1 A II - .QM �•, . .c:lW II a. 9aj .'. j 6 .a"i! �I i,i © • • J : tf ; ,ii; •o I 1 I,�` t _ _ yr.• .o p GENMALOT.DOC CIT)ic OF RENTON . ; '.� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 3, 1998 Mr. James Jaeger 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SUBJECT: Stiegman Short Plat Project No. LUA-98-026,SHPL-H,ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 24, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, April 21, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 277-6186. Sincerely, .4‘AAA10--- Jennifer • Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. Walter Stiegman/Owner AcroTlyR Dry- 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -- . .: ....:.;::.. .:.,.. CITY O F R E NTO N OPMENT SERVICES DIVI ION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION (cont.) Note: If there s more,than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Mast 3r Application for each owner. EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: VptCP:t i,T W A L IER ST IE MRN ADDRESS: 2'6E15( Pep 4t/Oo6f PROPOSED LAND USES: 206 , # 14,1 S►NGUE. F mi1...Y REStpa.rnAL CITY: N 6 C, - ' ZIP: �V /O kEr \—ir I W'A , ! 30 '-- EXISTINGIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 2 961 7 Ce' R S I DE 11-1 PNL Stt,iG.LE. t-RmiLy TELEPHONE NUMBER: (Rs) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CO TACT PERSON 4PPLiCANT SAME Ns stlt--,c, NAME: ��" J Prr�n s ZJ Pt E.GER EXISTING ZO{{N'-I��NG: ADDRESS: 9'41 a I . 204 pL PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: ZIP: - v Et'JT, WA . 9vo3 ) SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4 .99 F G R'E 53) 850 - 0g34 SR �EI�� c 7 PROJECT VALUE: ,.,�� FEB;Eb L ,p� 199b I,'Q.J.C�O• - APMENT NAME:.,-. 4,1)•,, it ,o Ooo c. C Q DEVELOHIvitN1 PLANINIi �'!� 3 I� JHORT I �--�T IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTEC'fl6f1QREA7 TUN 1 R•• -T ��'• A'' AD. DRESS(S)/LOCATION: 1, lO .•,.�; .i • . :_A\� . 3. S. 34 I . 'V #t ,•Y IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY C3Tt-t 0F. V.i 1�SPFEZ� SENSITIVE AREA? KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 1E j z92 30� �?04-® ��-RN� �Isr wesr O F THE. P O Pos E LOTS LEGAL DESCRIP N OF PROPERTY (Attach separc- sheet if necessary) The. nor-kk 330 ' t oE + Lift( tiz. oc +e no w es-t- Y4 erP +�)e. ao u t�w es{- /4.. o-P' cH cm h T© Insh,f) 23 N• , R a.Yt e. S E. , w . t o . Ecc, - -� �. e�a.5't' 1n�0 $e�-� -/1-eves . . .. ..... . .... . . .. ...... . . .. .. .... . ... . ..... ....... . .. . .. .. ... TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ kSHORT PLAT $ /CVO, —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 500. _ REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name)WALTlJ . STiEG[11)1,risJeclare that I am (please check one)X the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and :1 , • s herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before _ r�d WAL.TER W_ STIFrMAN for thRentOoe State f Washing(fionidinglbthe , i- :.+f,` . r e'_er, (Name of Owner/Represen tive) June 1997. i . // if Aiii, ., i .„ rA (Signature of Owner/Re resentat• /"`( IA)ck0- 0 ' (Sig ature of Notary Public) ' r.. (This sec;- • to be com byldity Staff.) City;File Number 1,41A4e--(pep lwo,) SA R HPL)CU LLA PP ;FP TP SP RVMP v A W F UD SM SME P BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES $;� TOTAL.POSTAGE PROVIDED $j',' REVISED 2/95 - STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed short plat will divide an existing 4.99 acre lot into 8 new residential lots. Six of the lots will be approx. 6000 SF, one lot will be 9500 SF and the remaining lot will be 3.42 acres. The large lot is capable of being further divided in the future with the ultimate yield meeting the City's minimum density requirement. This short plat is essentially an extension of the O'Connor Plat that is near final approval. All of the utilities and roads with curbs, gutters and sidewalks have been installed as part of the work approved for the O'Connor Plat. NO ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SHORT PLAT. Other than the recently constructed roads and utilities, there are no structures or improvements on the site. The site is zoned R-8. All of the adjacent parcels are also zoned similarly. The property to the north is the existing plat of Winsper. The property to the east is the newly constructed O'Connor plat (Winsper II). The properties to the south and west are larger parcel residential lots that are undeveloped, all zoned R-8. [he site is sloped at approx. 8% down from the east to the west. There are several wetlands on the site. These wetlands were mapped and reviewed as part of the approvals for the O'Connor plat and for the downstream sewer and drainage pipelines from the O'Connor plat that were under the application by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. IRECEPITI ..EB 2 U 1398 pCVELONv"�Re�ON 1NG ovre OF CITY OF RENTON .i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION .AFFIDAVIT` OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC t[ 1FORMATION SIGN($) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) To.N()e5 v • TQom- , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 10 day of Oc. a 6e-'1" , 19i 7 , I installed 1 public information sign(s) of the property located at S. W e,LU 5 .1 • for the following project: _, stI€ or�` R al- Project n me Liter e-F4Yl°— Owner Name 2. T ' s ut� 'nfo ation sign(s)was/were constructed and installed in locations i 40 kCGi the requirements of Renton Municipal Sections 9-12-8 G and 9-12-9-I , df` ��f • yt :��--sARy�N•. �G�.‘ ,� /0 'YYI.s J /, ' ' PUBLIC > Aff - , t / �w v 9$ v.- / u�V o T�,oF iN1pN SUBSCRIB� ' . D SWO�N to before me this &(Um day of �/° _ , 19 q2r . Ike. . t til .7 eA ., Sion f ',s F /• r�,y� in�, • PUL_. - NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, 'ft. °4rzo, residing at ,p79/7 . 'a -� • 7NASA `.= My commission expires on 7 a2D -��' . PUBSIONS.00C REV.MS I - - .................. .... .... • CITY OF RENTON ' ' .:;.::..::.::::..::: DEVELQPiNEl11ERV�CIi;S�Dl1CISIA[�f 5.111,1 MAILB J. REQUIREMENTS NOTICE FOR ALL NEW PLATS AND SHORT PLATS The Post Office wants to be involved in helping you locate your mailboxes before construction begins. Please take a copy of your plat map along with this form to the City of Renton Post Office, 314 Williams Avenue South, for their sign-off. Before we can approve your plat we must have the signed copy in our file. This procedure will save you time and money later if you get approval now. . Propery Location: Owner's Name: Phone#: Project#: Post Office Approval: Date: .M 1dUct y : : • .RAJ 3ER ENGINEER 1G 9419 S. 204 PLACE - KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAx (253) 850-0155 February 5, 1998 Jennifer Henning City of Renton Planning Dept. 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Stiegman Preliminary Short Plat Application Minimum Density Requirements Dear Jennifer, I have submitted the preliminary plat map for the Stiegman short plat showing 8 lots within the 5 acre parcel. You will notice that 7 or the lots are approx. 6000 SF in area, which is consistent with the lot size needed to meet the minimum density requirements for this R-8 zone. These lots are clustered around the existing road and within the only sizable area of the parcel not encumbered by wetlands or wetland buffers. The large lot is being held for potential future development. However, the layout of the potential future lots within the large lot, or the shadow plat, cannot be anticipated until a comprehensive wetland plan is considered. Hopefully, a wetland plan could utilize some method of combining the wetlands into one area and free up a portion of the remaining area for residential lots. The City's zoning code allows for some exemptions from the minimum density requirement. There is a provision that the minimum density may not be imposed if the property had some physical constraints that precluded the development of the land. The onsite wetlands are a physical constraint. (Sect. E,2,c, City R-8 zoning code 4-31-5). In light of the above information, I request that the City accept the preliminary plat map as submitted. Thank you. Sincerely 9,01..xyu,0 - • ' �1 James J. Jaeger, P.E. 0.v KNO`4 c7 FEB 20 '98-�� GcA JIELiYT TITLE CEP AYD � uS 603 P01 FEB GF024 09:27 42 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington underwra t ten by Ff de11 ty 1Va ti:.na I Tt tl a Insurance Company 3500 188th Street SW #300 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 425) 771-3031 / 527-1432 Fax NO. (425) 224-0837 Direct Line (425) 640-3508 / 640/3505 Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 PLAT CESIUM ATE TO: O'CONNER L.AW/FW 11707 SOUTH 341SST. 8 C FEDERAL WAY, W 98003-0003 Attention : TOM Your Number : -- Reference Name: STIEGMAN, WALTER W. OUR NUMBER 0701371 - Plat. Certificate Premium : $ 350.00 Sales Tax: S 10,10 ERTIF:CATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PRAT Dear Sire: In the matter of the above described Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and from such examination hereby certifies that: TITLE TO the following described land is vested in: WALTER w. STISGMAN and ISLE C. STIEGMAN, Co-Trustees of ;he Stiegman Revocable Inter Vivos Trust created June 9, 1994 THE LAND is situate in said King County, and is described as rollows: See Attached - Page 2 RFCC�Y r) FEB 10 1998 a `��TM p R ToON'N FEB 20 '961 0a-c3Hhl FIELIiIiY TITLE UyED lA`( 603 P92 FEB P. 'yb 09:27 upAL DESCRIPTION_ The North 33C feet of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; ECCEP7 the East 660 feet thereof. Situate in the County of Xing, State of Washington. N TE FOR INFORlSTIONAL PZTRPOSES ONLY; The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65-04. said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal descriptions within the body of the document. P_n of the SWl/4 S29 T23M R5E !;UB.TECT :0 the exceptions shown herein. No search has been made as to the taxeB and iasseesmmnts. '^HIS CERTIFICATE shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate Applied for. iecords examined to January 23, 1998 at 8:0C A.M. Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Linda Johnson, for Ti Officer Loraine Livings , Aeat. le Officer (293) 272-4090 1-868-272-4 FAX (253) 272-4390 FEB cL '9B 1f1:43AM FIDELITY TITLE FED kAY 603 P03 FEB a' ] �j[� 1 L1JV 4 4 1JL ♦✓VV 1 VI 1•1 LL U 09:28 Fidelity National 'Title Company of Washington Flat Certificate, Page 3 Our Number 701371 EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien ot any real eetate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Renton. The excise tax rate is 1.78% ac of DeCember 26, 1991. 2 . GENERAL TAXES AND RELATED CHARGES PAID: Year: 1997 Amount: $1,264.91 Tax Account No. : 291505-9040-08 Levy Code: 2130 Value of Land: $90,000.00 3. General taxes and related c2 rgee, if any, for the year 1998, not payable until February 15, 1998, in an amount not yet available from the County Treasurer's Office. Tax Account No. . 192305.9040-08 Levy Code: 2130 4. The legal description Chown in Schedule A was determined from the property address provided at the time ot application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. 5. £A.sEMBNT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMMNT: Recording No. : 6120436 Purpose: Community access Affects: 30 foot wide at southwest corner of property The description contained in the above instrument is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. 6. DRAINAGE RELEASE, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded; September 14, 1988 Recording No. ; 8809140381 7, A RECORD OF SURVEY AND MATTERS RELATING PTO: Recorded: January 1990 Recording No. : 9001109004 Affects_ Said premises S. ENCROACHMENTS DISCLOSED EY A RECORD OF SURVEY: Recorded: Ossuary 1990 Recording No. : 9001109004 As Follows: Fences along all property lines FE3 20 '93 10:43AM FIDELIT`( TITLE FED WAY P .5 1"'d00'"G r4'4.JOK) ,4 ,e2 1 P u�v 1 i el 603 F04 FEB 2e:' 09:28 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Plat Certificate, Page 4 Our' Number 701371 9 EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED EY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: November 18, 1996 Recording NO. : 9611100695 In Favor Ot: Soos Creek water and Sewer District Purpose: Sanitary sewer lines and/or appurtenances Affects: The West 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of the above-described parcel of land; And the North 15.00 feet of the South 126.50 feet of said parcel 10. EASEMENT AND CONDSTIONSD ON'iAINEecember 1 THEREIN, AS GRANTEA BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: 1996 Recording No. : 9612311919 Affects: The West 15.00 feet of the South 121.50 feet; Arid the North 15.00 feet of the South 121.50 feet thereof 1:.. ENCROACHMENTS DISCLOSED OBYoAerECO�, i997 OF SURVEY; Recorded: Recording No.: 9710229002 As Follows: Concrete retaining wall and fence on North line END OF EXCEPTIONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY RE OF FURRT ER ASSISTANCE,PLEASE GIVE US A CALL STIEGMAN SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed short plat will divide an existing 4.99 acre lot into 8 new residential lots. Six of the lots will be approx. 6000 SF, one lot will be 9500 SF and the remaining lot will be 3.42 acres. The large lot is capable of being further divided in the future with the ultimate yield meeting the City's minimum density requirement. This short plat is essentially an extension of the O'Connor Plat that is near final approval. All of the utilities and roads with curbs, gutters and sidewalks have been installed as part of the work approved for the O'Connor Plat. NO ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SHORT PLAT. Other than the recently constructed roads and utilities, there are no structures or improvements on the site. The site is zoned R-8. All of the adjacent parcels are also zoned similarly. The property to the north is the existing plat of Winsper. The property to the east is the newly constructed O'Connor plat (Winsper II). The properties to the south and west are larger oarcel residential lots that are undeveloped, all zoned R-8. The site is sloped at approx. 8% down from the east to the west. There are several wetlands on the site. These wetlands were mapped and reviewed as part of the approvals for the O'Connor plat and for the downstream sewer and drainage pipelines from the O'Connor plat that were under the application by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. RECFIVEn FEB l Lk 1998 DEVELOPMEivT PLANNING CITY OF RE`"NTON 0724 evir[ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PUP POSE OF CHECKLIST: The state Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agenwy identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your propcsal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise Information known, or give the best description you can. You riust answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you s iould be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to experts. If you really do not know the answer, or ifs question dcss rot apply to your proposal, write 'do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delay; later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time )r on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Compete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply.' IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. RFCFIVED F r 1998 :�tv �Urw�Llvi PLANNING CITY OF FiE'NTON Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: s-h ,(Th Plc- 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: CevN`hx Pu- 50—vine , EAt8-i €e-rry„ (ass) 2)6o - 04 � 4. Date checklist prepared: aY, . a , qq8 5. Agency requesting checklist:l� 1 D l�-e-✓+ D�v-e-(opMeAr:t' Setr iI ces D1viy7cY, 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 0.UNn N c`."1 OP No aril S cth t 'f1 e S l r I Beztl, house- P..ovv5-ruc t SPrLv I9 q € 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this prop9sal. ov d� r.e-ob -t- 3 • br una.ce, T•ecCn Re for--f- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, includingf the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. plvl 0. Str\cpe_ I o+ lye+ s new re s 1 �.eX.�-1°4 I of s . ( � 's `' " Io-f-S ouno() o,ne,- o.--v' «' Cem st"w C1-1 un 04) a s aun d c�.l i.1es s 6€ ,e I e - 1 as earl_ df Me D ic.,m or- Pio, 2 Envi onmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. I crTh wie ItS N-Ve- J . tr-eGl i 4 � � p-� A-I,ry O��OY1 S . n we sf- oP -�h e O l P o r� • .�`} SW % S�� 2-9 , T. 23r�. � SE, �� ao`� e�c-v-(ff7dy-) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Fre Nm . SlRotr"-•e(01-m°i' 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollingsteep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 107o ± c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note•any prime farmland. f l-��,�1 , S11 S AS St �+ No n(Yui3,v-m d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. I�l o .et- O s 01-‘v\Cd f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Q O , •IO f rDIOSP� C_A5•0 S�Y'v e-- l v'Y") g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? c\-- ,(10 L)S - • r 1 ek r a rcO e& O.Ae\c4 3 Envi onmental Checldisi h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: — No e.c_rs 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and:when the project is completed? If .any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.. vJ�l Ov S�5 wre. t e tc-d , -`M I ZZ1 LY S aw+13 S \(e In v c.) c.� o.w ) ' c,rn N-./ m ok-e b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that-may affect yourproposal? If so, generally describe. N c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface Water. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,-wetlands)? If yes; describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what ream or river it flows into. es . 0ns�t� u�--ri o s ho.L�e. be exJlej O.,v vVrje 1e are. S},own eJ•n y y � 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A\ ( wow Nck-2-7 e- e� 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. O 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Nib 4 Envi onmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. skbrvy\ ,, C ��e c�i e a(�c�ourr?2-4 f-) 1 S l b. Ground Water: 1) - :Will ground water be.withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give :.general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N O 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for.example: Domestic sewage;-industrial,: containing-the-following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size-of the-system;the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and::method' of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other w ters, If so, describe. er III q / � €e- � ,S'I-DYm ��S� w t I l be. �IYZ� upr�dLex, o'r• DI SG Cr.N — w(1 ( (� t�-ej olocv 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?.If so, generally describe. .Tabofi I� Nb d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: J ,Dry wo 'ev-- (31cLi-eAnT1 t I x. prO0 t +ro rem�— a_2.. rrn Io w rCLt . 4. PLANTS a. Che9k or circle types of veil etation found on the site: deciduous tree: �-fi •.ple, aspen, other �/ evergreen tre: cedar fine, other t/ shrubs grass pasture crop or grain Vr wet soil plants: cattail f _ •ullrush kunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? i r r0•-> \'\ciA-P oc Jr)am �o (,Aex� u oNn r are. 1nSAeC.) 5 En memento!Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: I Nif I G�i r-e qca,,vr-1 a i "s c� X \cLw r k ruL6e.--V'-) In Qa.tr 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on-or near the-site or.are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds:Chawk eron, eagle, songbirds, other 1-0 b I h cxo uw S f alrrDw Mammalslde?I bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. �l Ur Q— c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating manufacturing, etc. c A ,,rne.5\ )4\41. € € ry nees - D hQ� b. Would your project affebt the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 Em ronmental Checfdid a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 10 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.BCC', U/ Se-ArvLIces wr M �ccul o..i►1� 40Y) 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Nc . b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,- construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N of se..- Nam. c. 0 cu,- rn 0 oLArN O GC ,�I cY'(No G� L 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: [ -I cTn.e, 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? srnd-\1 101- e-.n Cv Y r-exit b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. N�e- d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? -Po-km(I rem • a-I Env ronmental Checklist g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N Ut 1 t c b!e h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. I O i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 4, -? "10 fe of) e_ w o U rn�.s,d2-e. . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: C-e3NN1P( s, 4a z�c�. rn ta4).Z.5" 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. rG inn1r • rn'tdd e. - o u s ln? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. oy �x �P s I I i 6�, wo o� -f 2S ��n o r w b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? yid trV N UY�� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 8 Env onmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? �`P �-tom,O j_k 1_) Y\COre_ i� i Yl I ' OJ �Y�Q o l b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and,glare impacts, if any: 51Yee*- Ci �t be_ d\reed cAoLuoLuaxg 12. RECREATION �l a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N e \ m J I e S c a o o ( cep a Rsd oS2 p°- oar e, ham-b b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NI b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Name. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: k.\of- It fe I k CahIe 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Wells Imo . S , auk 3 3S 5T 9 Env.onmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N0 . r-'k (4- mV ' Z c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? _ , S 5. a..(-12_ ou Ioclk d. -Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or improvements to.existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? I�O e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate .vicinity=of) water, -,rail, or air transportation? If so, generaallyl describe. • Iy� f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by_the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. k• )(, 4�0 fS 461 you to Ie- Ptm P I\ - sb ‘N O L) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ,�1 Una 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generallyyescribe. Ve. Ni.�I 1 (e s1 jv� r-a J ,n b o I t ) re rr eod t cat sc)loa € . w+ll 6e. ram- C( b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Cir • utilities curren _ - .' .ble at the site: e e ricity, natural gas alp N1, ___ el-phon: sanitary sewer, eptic system, other. T• Y. io Em ronmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. I� f oft e S Q� �S kiN� C. SIGNATURE .I, the.undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It -is.understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 90zie:_ruName Printed: �YY1 2S Z , T0.eder Date: I / 9J 9 11 FEET-16-1993 11;2E, FRI B12 ASSOCIATES TO 8500155 P.01 "7rq111,3a,„ 4.40/11.. '/11 B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Mccker St. (v)253-859-0515 • i " et Suite C (f)253-852-4732 b12assoc@cum uServc.com Kent,V<A 9�U3..•5751 (e) P February 16, 1998 City of Renton Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Steigman Property 13-twelve Job/96-137 This letter is to verify the accuracy of the previous wetland delineations completed on the Steigman property by 13-twelve in June of 1996. At the time we delineated these wetlands we were using the 1987 corps Manual as was required by the City of Renton. Since that time the City now requires that wetlands be delineated using the methodology described in the Washington State Wetlandds Delineation Mangy (1997). These two documents describe essentially the same methodology and the delineations done in June of 1996 should still be considered accurate under the new methodology. On February 13, 1998, I visited the site to verify the accuracy of the original delineations. I found all of the delineations are accurate wider the new methodology used by the City of Renton (Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manuj , 1997). The only change to the site was the construction of the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Talbot Trunk line along the south side of the site. Impacts to wetlands and buffers in this area were restored following this construction project. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515. Sincerely, Post-1r Fax Note 7671 0 2.i. S g- Pat s►J B-twelve Associates, Inc. T� Fes`". CoJDopt. Go Phony N Phone N PA Sewall Fax N 8S0 -4/ 5 ' Fax Senior Wetland Ecologist — - »C:id/96137-01 Joe RECFIVFn FEB 2 0 199B t7tVELot CITY OFhRE N ONI TOTAL P.01 JR-dEcIER tiglltrKd611 • 9119 .1.204 f J K ' Kull.wa 98031 - 4200 850-0931• - rax 727-5320 July 24 , 1996 DR A l N AGE_ TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT STI EG HO Rr pLfFT- S 55th ST AND HELLS AVE S CITY OF RENTON PREPARED FOR: • Tom O' Connor Lang Construction Assoc . P.O. Box 23998 Federal Way, Wa . 98093 Tel : (206) 718-8923 PREPARED BY: Jaynes Jaeger, P . E. f• ��J�I.q�, , C1 0 it'1. 4, 1/ ^e 4 �AN Ty N\NG . eM ' a a • Jr � 1Ot ' 1, 20734 of • �:`StfV� rExp nE9 fin/ I . PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed plat is located in the City of Renton near the southeast City limits . It is situated west of SR 515 , southeast of the Plat of Winsper and north of SE 172 St . (projected) . It is within Sect . 29, Township 23 N. , Range 5 E . , W.M. The development includes four existing large parcels, two with residences and two vacant. The total acreage is 10 .21 acres for all four parcels . The subdivision will create 41 single-family residential lots . The existing two houses will remain and both will have oversized lots . Of the 45 remaining lots, four will have duplex residential units . The zoning for the three northern lots is R-8 , while the zoning for the southern-most parcel is R-10 . The existing property is a combination of second growth forest, livestock grazed pasture and residential landscaped yard. The pasture area is mostly cleared while the wooded areas have been disturbed by past grazing or other activity. The topography is a constant 15% slope dropping from the east to the west . The edLisi:ing access points onto the property arc fz:.,m 104th Ave . SE, via SE 172nd St . and directly from SR 515 . A proposed future access point will also be constructed from S Wells St . within the Winsper neighborhood. 1 1, tlD i rl OAKSDALE 1= I At' I=� SW' = ., S r'' I _ _ _ p 1 POWELL kV SW ` • � ) N )OG 1*co RANOND • L--- 1 1 T Ac At• SN �.1 ' A1' Su w R4L ` RA ND AV SW k. 700 —� "c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �— - - - -430•' - I 1 - . til New 1,-,-, S NECA av,SW N_ SENECA = 8----.42,-" ` t' • p c I ND -, --y AV $b' gl— 1 L� r�V SW AV SW 340(, 1 _ vs 1900 1--. N i .1 7O0 Pi I n _ •L'. Cii� AV�51 � o La) p E VALLEY RD loll "` NAME �` _ ei S AN V It t I AN s► �Iv N„^a„ _ ■ A>, a ) 1 = �' =:,.canM2�� !N NI 3 \\ 1.111111111ft:■ sHATTucr. rs- 4 z } lit ^� ~ _ Q� 0 ;/ r„`` a^ + 130E T O ^ =I NORRIS =,•. { rt ..». �tN' �` An ` EM _'.~ MORRIS_ I A:y c FA, "L 2 0 -. v_ it -a ,r r- W11WR1M ClS 7,� 0 i rn. SM1 T�i� .tM �• y of S ti GQ�r Vf � Koe�c ry S s � z ..l4'1' .: I= .AY „Ai may• SHIINFRS AV ^ R to v: r 1000:: ;:T•i 4., v A: S H c.. i .; ti\�� f '� *0.1 vl -M(1NFRS�. BU r1r ~ v: , RS y'WITK15iy t'. ^� "' I-�•tv+= AO m ^; . iTrElN I= CIS 11 - 's --.� / WlurAalsS 'i 1 ?- V` LT / I //,,, r6� ....�5,�� ^ n� WIIIIAHS AN ^ < a 1 rr .,,(' - • 1, E I g - 'r f. s , \ t71 W C `1 �� r. 444, to a s ��a Ti s MA I P; soG 1_ .. C1 LC Ay ++� S CEDARnAI Pe S ,vs o �L b CA`e CEDAR ' `r NlS .7 y� Ib CEDAR AV —�ri,Th i' I O ( — Al' $ =� -I A -S�' v+ �4 ' IN $ A 1051H AV"5.••'�..• 7 µ1 STH -•.Aciiti 5t.\R 5 c a - N oN q V —a z jTi N GRAu' _., C 1800 4` ^JONES At 700 '_ 1�8T Fi j+ ^' i N^A1� N . ». [�tlIN Jr-'IOMfSrl1-i e}.:..'a.'� ...I - 'i a! SE. r' ii y, �,S Nor 35�aNe" ry K - 1.. II S " 19 JOKE 1' )., 1M1H AN S[ Cr!. .�a'_.. /091„ �109T1;-- i AV SE m .„DSO is 1S "s 7' O ro'� 1Ia1H ar -r. '� 'o *St�C c 3 - �_ c C, �`. b, .- 3 .. •Si4��. Tat( s[ a ��I = i 4� L...:^ i` ` ;IINCOtH PI -c i I IMca� �`M ��# - +1:111, avcF v+ rlr!..:: .`' I111TN - AV SE =K`rt�Ir r :5 A: .� . 1 - Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Tom 0 1C—cmrQv- Project Name C L--e-Pr) Or Address 2, 0 , 4X 2-39 548 Location Phone -71 — Z-3 Township 23 Kt Project Engineer 3-01-`Me S Range S 1= _9 Company SaLQ Q.+r' V' ,t Q1-I v\ Section Project Size 10 Z-I AC Adc ress Phone 4-lscr 5 , 2-0 4- Pi— , fret Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 S AC SO- 3 4-- 122 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPUCATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS ,‹ Subdivision I 1 DOF/G HPA I I Shoreline Management I Short Subdivision ( I COE 404 I I Rockery I I Grading I I DOE Dam Safety I I Structural Vaults I I Commercial I FEMA Floodplain I I Other I Other I I COE Wetlands l ) HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community ,HILL Vrl c F }�t�.I - I Pt L OOT 'T�'► I LL Drainage Basin Low GREY R WEAIZ 112 6. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1 River I I Floodplain I I Stream Wetlands C10.Ts 3 - v r red L, o. Critical Stream Reach I 1 Seeps/Springs I I Depressions/Swales I I High Groundwater Table I I Lake I I Groundwater Recharge I I Steep Slopes I I Other 1 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART T SOILS oil Type h Slopes Erosio Poten 'al Erosive Velocities laex-woo Lp%a- 1S°/n IN\ 5,0 FPS-+ I I Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET -ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT 1 Ch. -Downstream Analysis n j�nSL, ry I 1 Il I } Il [ 1 Addi•Tonal Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINI AUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DUR NG CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Sedirientation Facilities Stabilize Exposed Surface Stabi ized Construction Entrance Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris I I Clewing and Grading Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cove~Practices I 1 Flag Limits of NGPES >< Construction Sequence I I Other I I Other 'ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Grass Lined Channel I I Tank I I Infiltration Method of Analysis Pipe System I I Vault I I Depression SBUt-[ I I Oper Channel I I Energy Dissapator Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation Dry F and 1 Wetland I I Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage I Wet Fond I I Stream I I Regional Detention r Brief Descr otion of System Operation :IL (�� 1 crn t ec G _I( Oc1t.T ii-1 0.A Pc I f1 4Q, ��� 1 s he ..v p ��?-e_ ,pel+wr— Tal Iboi- Facility Rel Ited Site Limitations I I Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) J Drainage Easement I 1 Cast iri Place Vault 0 Other I I Access Easement I 1 Retaining Wall L 1 Native Growth Protection Easement I I Rockery>4'High I I Tract I Structural on Steep Slope [ 1 Other 'ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil Engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchmenl s. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. 1/90 II . CORE REQUIREMENTS AND WORKSHEET The drainage core requirements are identified in the City adaptation of the King County Drainage Manual . Each of these 5 core requirements have been reviewed and addressed in this report and accompanying drainage design. The core requirements were addressed as follows : 1 . The natural drainage discharge location of the site is along the western property line . There are several wetland areas and low spots along this property line but the ultimate runoff is collected by the ditch along the east side of Talbot Road. The developed drainage will collect the runoff into a detention vault and convey the discharge via a pipe to Talbot Road through downstream properties . Additionally, a short dispersal trench will be placed at the southwest corner to disperse the upstream, offsite runoff at its natural location, which is this corner of the property. 2 . An off-site drainage analysis is included in this report in section VI . A level one off-site drainage analysis is included. 3 . Peak rate runoff control will be accomplished using a concrete detention vault . The discussion and calculations for designing this pond are detailed in section V of this report . 4 . A conveyance system has been designed and submitted with these engineering plans . A network of catch basins and pipes are mostly located along the sides of the roads . The conveyance system will be able to handle the 25 year flows within the pipes and the 100 year flows within the catch basins or road prism. 5 . An erosion and sedimentation control plan has been submitted with the engineering plans . None of the Special requirements apply to this project . The project will produce over an acre of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic, however the downstream wetland areas are class 2 or lower grade . 7/21/96 Jaeger Engineering page 1 O' Connor Plat drainage Analysis Predeveloped Drainage-Stiegman BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D10 NAME: Predeveloped, Stiegman, 10 yr SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 52 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 31 . 69 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0850 PEAK RATE: 0 . 27 cfs VOL: 0 . 16 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: D100 NAME : Predeveloped, Stiegman, 100 yr SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 52 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 31 . 69 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0850 PEAK RATE: 0 . 51 cfs VOL: 0 . 26 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D2 NAME: Predeveloped, Stiegman, 2 yr SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 .52 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 31 . 69 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0850 PEAK RATE: 0 . 10 cfs VOL: 0 . 08 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 36865688868866666666888866886868666686866666866686868668866668688816866666866 ; O 0 SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET 0 ° O 0 0 0 °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 .4000 0 0 °ARE°Flow Length (ft) • 250 . 00 °HOICES 0 °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 0 0 °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0850 0 °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 31 . 69 0 0 °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A 0 °ABS° ° °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 ° 0 °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y ° o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 . 2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 ° 0 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 . 2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 ° 0 °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 ° 0 °CN °Dense grasses • 0 . 24 0 0 o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 0 0 o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 0 °TOT° 0 0 °°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete 0 o Pg&666668686688888666666686688888666666688868688666886666668886efit ° A66888666666666688866666688668888866866668868&668666888666668686866886666666ef preAsw OD t)_g_c4 Tc IV. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The developed project will include a piped drainage system that will collect all of the runoff from the proposed roads . Each lot will also be provided with a drainage stub for connection to the gutters and footing drains . The piping from the developed site will discharge into a concrete, subsurface detention vault . This vault will be divided with a baffle wall to provide a two-cell storage structure . The vault will be sized to handle the 2 , 10 and 100 year storm events . It will discharge into a grass-lined biofiltration swale that is located adjacent to the vault . The configuration of the plat is such that a number of lots cannot drain into the vault . These are the lots along the low, western plat boundary. Because of this, these lots will be considered as developed bypass flow. Their respective developed flows will be subtracted from the vault' s allowable release rate for each storm. These are Lots # 29 through # 36 . It is anticipated that there will be three lots in the adjacent Stiegman short plat that will not be able to drain into the storage facility for that short plat . Because this vault can probably mitigate the bypass from these offsite lots better than the anticipated underground pipe, these lots will also be added to the bypass flow. The developed area that drains into the pond must also be adjusted to account for fringe roadways . There is a 72 ft . length of S . 34th St . next to the vault that cannot drain into the vault . This will not be added to the bypass because the flow will continue down the gutter and be caught by the storage system in the Stiegman plat . Its area will be added to that system. There is also a portion of 104th Ave . SE at the SE corner of the plat that will drain into the plat' s road and drainage system. This area should be added to the developed area at this time. These area calculations are shown on the following worksheet . Similar to the predeveloped drainage analysis, the developed drainage and the bypass were calculated using the SBUH hydrograph method. The computer data sheets are attached. A summary of the developed drainage characteristics are : STORAGE BYPASS Time of concentration: 13 . 32 min. 7 . 12 min. 2 year peak flow: 2 . 74 CFS 0 .46 CFS 10 year peak flow: 4 .57 CFS 0 . 76 CFS 100 year peak flow: 6 . 69 CFS 1 . 11 CFS pervious area: 4 . 93 Ac. 0 . 75 Ac . impervious area: 4 .37 0 . 66 iszt-D c,no e -).4)-14404 %IA+9 r'S -fit 4_ 'Q = `s oS 2 - = IQ•S I - �GLS 12 � b ssa IZ , ©1g).4 ctv, €j vh\ .�,\ ►� �J --tea rO r Cr (2 ` a -D-•v i I : ."4-,0 ff qs �-140, I ACov.0.D O s4,al p CD b .Sc.-b = 0005 + 2S'-b 4 bb� + acst 000c cb - `baGO2 :� b ssroad�9 o I 2 .a( <4.a.04 o\f‘ \ 0 \ -C_4- CO sd-sev ' I .f. • ,r rO f UDC, JA Q VA , -a t� 1 �� a �'m `'so ss�'( �9 U ' 9 1 f� a,^ t m o o� -ar� �a u a9 Cam' ! l 1 a11 AA, II " 2��Ic�' Ewa--I-'a S-�=1 O ,�- � v� ova w�J os ^o 4-a a vro -Z frtf' a- -vD"Li-v%r-0 t } ` cas �:.�Y�d 1�T �7 ` SRO a Cm-,o C a i l tcr -�-"°l o d � j ' te S.{.0 � SI_sh"1�NN/ 4 C G�dCr=i\- ) 0l rC©"DtQ File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; eeeeeeeeee ; O o SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET 0 0 O 0 0 0 °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 . 1500 0 0 °ARE°Flow Length (ft) • 100 . 00 °HOICES ° °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 0 0 °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0700 0 0 °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 7 . 51 0 0 °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A 0 °ABS° 0 0 °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 0 0 °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y 0 o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 . 2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 0 0 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 .2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 ° 0 °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 0 0 °CN °Dense grasses • 0 . 24 0 0 o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 0 0 o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 0 °TOT° 0 0 °OF10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete 0 o Pgaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefit ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Q V. DETENTION STORAGE The required drainage detention will be provide by a concrete subsurface vault . The vault performance was determined by routing a level pool analysis through a defined storage structure and a defined flow restrictor. The results are shown on the attached worksheet and computer summary sheets . The results show that the vault will met the required performance for each storm event . It actually discharges less than the allowable rate for the 10 and 100 year storms . The vault also provides some excess storage volume . This will allow additional freeboard for the 100 year storm. � I � rO C-C"n o T De- `,V' _ • h) • cdsus-i-ZA) (Dire_O._ tr\ot Irch, 9 , Z.► - O , O2 -• 0 , 11 - C9 , 1 fr s- 2 C.v R\l E. IN1 V m 116502 c3, ttpice l 4-7 I of = 0 on CFs-/ ire_ 10 s o (ouS. 4-.CPCC Vr11 S c3.�Xe- 4� /O \r9 QarV W ;; 1 _ -„w� V 3.S .Z F3 k y t Cho . `'O`) NNQS g g c) tmPamN ,o.., sa aPI fe__,r.mu,...)s = ekr> � =0� , c 5-0, It CC) D42±-e---4A+1 crn -, 1 v�ov S . . 4769 �3 q-. 37 � a By I r +r-�I cw S • , S 3(I. -I r 3 . Two E of c-or r cE J TR 1=4 r 0►.l ( 1-1 ow ,nfp o� e 1 (O . vC S\APB..�' f'`ow �v-ea/' s1 �'y = 4 , s% I10 -I-e-r 51`12-s J b) rG z- t r\ .10 Q'J'e- ���. 0-P 101% , Tc Z = 0 , a`3 rn 1r . See. C) I G3 = Zoo ��, oT loll l TT (crn he-(3 - ow T © r S %D SI I C3 = Z.Z r•r\\Y1 , „Tee J4r-i-- e. ' ') d) 1'c Tc3 = 13, 3Z rr . 4 . E CON GE-ND,` Ot-J ( B\f S Clnw) rG = I b0 . oo -R-t av-'e-r- sior. _ tea-- �� I 0 Tc = IN\1Y\Ute C See- GCN`TO - J s 00 -bL2 =Z ) (Fe:Jo ra r\--0-F -A 4 .c-c) -/NIK-0=) : s-v;oorkr)--10.a. • par ck)f-ercca(1 r'Z�OYJ o V\Y7 Q 7/21/96 Jaeger Engineering page 1 O' Connor Plat drainage Analysis Developed Hydrographs-Stiegman BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E10 NAME: Developed, Stiegman, 10 yr SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 64 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 .51 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 56 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0700 PEAK RATE : 0 . 64 cfs VOL: 0 . 21 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: E100 NAME: Developed, Stiegman, 100 yr SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 64 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 . 51 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 56 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0700 PEAK RATE : 0 . 94 cfs VOL: 0 . 30 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: E2 NAME: Developed, stiegman, 2 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 64 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 .51 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .56 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0700 PEAK RATE: 0 .39 cfs VOL: 0 . 13 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 1)-e-u-e-1T-e0 File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool Jaeger Engineering 266666666666666666i 3eee6666666666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee66666666e6666eeeeee66e66666eeeeeeeeeeeee; o ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE 0 o MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT 0 o DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD 0 o 0 °2 year 0 . 10 0 .39 2 2 222 . 81 0 . 10 11 0 °10 year 0 . 27 0 .64 2 2 223 . 65 0 .27 12 ° °100 year 0 . 51 0 .94 2 2 224 . 80 0 . 51 13 0 o i rE\ (t)k ) if 0 uT1 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O >Done< F10 to Exit 0 aee66e66eeee66e66eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee6ee6ee666666eee66666e66666666666eef Available Memory remaining: 170040 bytes Current Data Set Name: \OCONNER.bsn 7/22/96 Jaeger Engineering page 1 O' Connor Plat Drainage analysis Level Pool Routing-Stiegman LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2 year 0 . 10 0 . 39 2 2 222 . 81 11 997 . 06 10 year 0 . 27 0 . 64 2 2 223 . 65 12 1591 . 65 100 year 0 . 51 /0 . 94 2 2 224 . 80 13 2219 . 79 1---eu-e-\ Pc �� a"1 �J1L. OFFSITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS A. Analysis of Resources : Several resource materials were reviewed for the preparation of this analysis . These resources include: 1 . City of Renton general topography maps . 2 . King County sensitive areas folios . 3 . Washington State Dept . of Transportation design plans for SR 515 . 4 . King County drainage investigation problem maps . 5 . City of Renton drainage maps . B. Upstream Off-site Drainage The upstream off-site drainage onto the site is isolated in one area. SR 515 runs along, or near, the entire eastern property boundary which is the upgradient property line for the site . The drainage system within SR 515 intercepts the runoff from the east and directs it to the north within its conveyance system. There is one area that off-site drainage enters the site . It is very near the southeast corner of existing Lot 1 where a man-made drainage ditch appears at the east property line. It appears that this drainage originates at SE 172 St and is piped under the residential lot at the southeast corner of Lot 1 . The outlet of this culvert begins the ditch. This ditch was never flowing during inspections throughout the summer. The tributary area appears to be small and the ditch can be accommodated within the proposed development by piping the culvert along the west property line and discharging it through a dispersal trench near the southwest corner. C. Downstream Drainage The discharge from the site will be detained and treated prior to discharge . The detention vault will be designed to accommodate the 100 year storm event . A grass-lined biofiltration swale will be constructed adjacent to and downstream from the vault . From the bioswale, the drainage will discharge into a 12" pipe that will run west onto the adjacent property. The pipe will be parallel to the sanitary sewer main, both within a common easement or right-of-way. The pipe will continue to the west for a total of 1650 ft . within three separate offsite lots . It is anticipated that the pipe will be 12" corrugated polyethylene pipe with a smooth interior wall . The slope of the pipe will average between 7% and 8% . The pipe will terminate onto Talbot Road. There is an exisitng storm drainage system within the east side of Talbot Road. This drainage system includes six type 1 and type 2 catch basins connected by 12" concrete pipe . The drainage flow is to the south along Talbot Road. Just south of S . 172 St . , an 18" culvert carries the runoff to the west under Talbot Road. A visual inspection of the system along Talbot Road did not reveal any problem areas . I N 168I 16, 1 1 168\ - 1 --\[ L . \ \\\ � N 167,980 05 I - I C — E 1,660,542.84 • i 4l _� `1\\JE) i II 1LIK ° • _ I ,i \ \ t �^ 1 i -\7" \ I N p II I x 1 ( x- D 1, tN O i ON 1� \ � � I L [ n 1 1 I \ '1 II I \ if I 1 ) , ci t Li .-,-1 , :.... _ , 7 1111 ai . _ --. , - NN T R E E S 111, 12, 1‘1 W 1 ii , \` 1 t 1 � N i 6� \ I \ 1 \; 1 ', i 1 4 II) % 1EP 1 I 11 ? 1 D \ / , AP: )1 ) g. 172 ND ST I D D A T E D \� --, , , �x x 7 ( x II I F x " x \7/ F 1 L D i l 1 y G3 24E2-1 shib Q I LY 26,G3-1 26,F3-3 • ~ i A 6.63-2 S 25 ST {-- 2 3-3 26,F3-2 26r3-4 IN U 61 I N 12. nil G . 2-.G3-8 6,G3-7 • -4 • 1- 26.G3- Cn TO . �1 J II A . 4 2613-1 • WI • 26)132 •� S 0 T �. . ST 26,G3-5 M4- 26 1 '.4-I 26E4-2 I24H4-B• ' 26y14 5 © 411 IA 26,G4-1 •��4 4-14 I #44110,* 14-7 24 4-3 2t,F4-5 026f1-129 26,64-2 •� 26.14-4 £ S '8T PL iii,ililli. _ 4-13 . $6l4.. $ N � 26.rt4 10 . 0 si 26f 4-6 . � 26,H4 9 Adak AL 26F4-7 24G4-6 24r+-3 tem., � 26F4-8 26.W- I �. � � �� .2614-1 • 26r4-9 I 26,Ga-4� . 2414-2 26F4-2 / 26F4-II ., ' ... 24F4-10 � 2 �� � . 261s-7 4M+-16 • i 6F4-I - �. �• . .2615-8 26,65-4 �''4� 24t5-6 / ,' ,` 2615-3 -0 6.E• IO255 • �25624t433: >' � •• 2413-5 1- . 26 6115-9 ® I. • ,T 26F5-3 • bf5-7 • ?6 J 26.15-3 �T CO "5.81 1 I 1 2415/2 26F5-2 I 4'4\ Ilk 26F5-1 rn rn 24F6-8 26F6-6 }--- 26.F6-5 '26F6-7 .�26F6-4 -6F6-3 \• A Li d 26f6-2 . •26f6-1 2646-2 26. 6-6I :""'' - ST26E6 31 �26.146-7 26,C7-5 126.66-84.12617-4 Pr�--26E7-61 �• +26M7-6 24E7-3 It6F7-626,N7-7S 172ND STi� 26,E7-2 • • 26,F7-2 ./ II r / .. . ilIMI I I- `� S 36H ST 1 APPENDIX CHARTS, TABLES, GRAPHS FROM KING COUNTY SWM MANUAL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.]H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 33.10z____ .01— 51.0., -.: --v,,, I-, -strIjoir-____ ,..._____I-- :ti. -- .--. iii- ‘' vo IV I----t-, rkl iii i i i i ifi., IY. %wit wrifitit ; lik it -- 3‘3*6 I _stow _.„.„10.40--Iditavkimi -4-4 aftvelh ai .? aijord. -, ii:- ‘ 4 „ttIO' 4.8.7% f)%4MITPASII-iiiiiiii4041111 VijOir II.. 1,1)101 y 4/ ‘Ak?.411.741M1111,100441. \\ If 4.i --N ,NOttelirr , i rz,-, lia NIL V1101 - , 4.3. 1___ vOkt0S-7,-- - 2 74.11 hw 401eV �. Z =4 a : l -- r1= rg /&� : ,. ii4-01ppr . ... * ,11;z ii :41 .., i } - _ 4S \IPA� SIN� etaltriA � r� 3' T-111 'mg\ - Onka.. t 4%., �- . , ' \ ,_. 'Pt" ./ ittlik: , tAve ,, , r- 6 i , I .2 uiS A* x ..-- ..w1 v \ kNif (Ppi -111111111104"2 - � ! - tarlIOAN - rid , 'aims/.3.J_ , pinos zv-r.,. %,_;...1wwnik‘. 11Kiht,ST40 i:71i44" Mil my=1411103Nrcipt", 'fit / Alip / .: _,4,somorwro -ak i , , . . , ,rid .) ,--- \F.411.4 it....1.4-01'Zz-44,..\. ** ' • ,1 1*1 ' 1-Kligi.lb. - % '44E7 111611Mi - ilk kV' A / lehlVE ''' 7 % Ilk 4.trillal 1;74 101,. . ,igt, . AEI) i- nTA -- - I►\;h 'e,, _ lb -teiii. ...diegairre- t diZ -( , J.- --) 01151 ybP4iik' l . 11 .0:4--. /. i _.\ 1 raw girl,--, :vol.,Wii,"*-11004, Ar-; t . .. N v, _ - 1Pires -‘401641/ I )41 , ;, --,c Er:L.__ .214,v Akit _..!? inri .1 tcp, - - t-- --- -; warm r4 4WAIEW*101111t ... -- - - 100-YEAR 2,4-HOUR PRECIPITATION tor q'h., ��������� �lho ..... ..0.06-5_,- •3.4 ISOP'_WIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOURtil p.. •���r.�,l��� 5.5 TOM PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 03-11 , 0,. ' 0 1 2 3 a S 6 7 e Milos - w �1-_ 6 3.5.1-13 O" �O �-t- 1:300,000 '• • 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASH GTON, SURFACE WATE ] 1ESIGN MANUAL TABLE 35.E B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS In 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distnbution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD CultM ted land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landsc aping. gc od condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fa r condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking tots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Imper rious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Singly' Famly Residential (2) Dwell ng Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Flamed unit developments. % impervious cond 3miniums, apartments, must be computed comr iercial business and indu:trial areas. .. , (1) For a more detailed desorption of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972 (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff Is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 1/90 File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool J2eeeeee6666666666686668; 0 0 °Rectangular vault ° °Trapezoidal basin 0 °Underground pipe ° °Sto list ° 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; ° o UNDERGROUND PIPE 0 0 o STORAGE STRUCTURE ID: 2 0 0 o °eeeeeeef °Name : Stiegman Detention Pipe ° °Pipe Length (ft) . . . : 180 . 00 ° 1.p °Pipe Diameter (ft) . : 4 . 00 0P.Ja ` `tom 1 `� °Pipe Slope (ft/ft) . : 0 . 0000 0 °Stage-Sto Increment : 0 . 10 0 ,fir °Starting Elevation : 221 . 00 0 e-�. °Structure Vol (cf) . : 2261 . 95 ° o Ac-ft . : 0 . 05 ° O 0 °PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit ° deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Available Memory remaining: 170040 bytes Current Data Set Name : \OCONNER.bsn File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; o MULTIPLE ORIFICE ° o DISCHARGE STRUCTURE ID: 2 ° O 0 °Name : Flow Restrictor, Stiegman 0 °Peak Dsgn Release Rate : 0 .51 cfs Orif /flow/elev 0 °Orifice Coefficient . . . : 0 . 62 Dia (in) /cfs/ ft 0 °Lowest Orifice Dia (in) . . : 1 . 62 1 . 62 0 . 14 cfs 0 °hl : Outlet to 2nd Orifice : 1 . 85 222 . 85 ft 0 °Second Orifice Dia (in) . . : 2 . 50 2 . 50 0 . 24 cfs 0 °h2 : 2nd to 3rd Orifice . . . : 1 . 00 223 . 85 ft 0 °Third Orifice Dia (in) . . : 2 . 25 2 . 25 0 . 13 cfs 0 °h3 : 3rd to 4th Orifice . . . : 0 . 00 0 °Fourth Orifice Dia (in) . . . 0 . 00 0 °h4 : 4th to 5th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 plow °Top Orifice Dia (in) . . . 0 . 00 I I� O 0 °Elevation of Lowest Orifice • 219 . 00 �- -- � 0.l: °Outlet Elevation • 221 . 00 0 °Max Elev Above Outlet • 224 . 80 0 °Stage-Disch Increment 0 . 10 0 O 0 Av°PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit 0 Cudeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee6eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef KING COUNTY, W __ J HINGTON, SURFACE WA R DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS . . _ :._ _. a - 6 - - h„,y, -iii• -•= -- -, :,,.. ----- ---t-- ti. / "7 41 ,01,114.1W .(2-Thm-,-,iii. \\11I .yik '4,07 sill% '.-.41 'i hia t w 'AN t 0 �-- 1 •,_ �u', _ o•-m a ..,,.,. , _ \ „,, .rs.)---c-v' I ..., .1Pb • '' , iliNcit , N-- 19 /-- -1-,!tilhaVi ,,. : 1 alPNIllaw‘ .\ --(It 41411.- '- -:'"'-v 1 IVA P*4114W' ) '. .\ . ‘.191.1.1, II "ma &54gdelftlialaki i ‘' ' ' Ilf,dr . , - t„.., \-,..1,2, .. ,, _ ,ic_ ,•,, ,,i• j *L_ 4- ,., w :'`s—"or 0 `.,' r ...c3„...0 ,. k'll 0 $1 * uu ,--/ .-Iliktipit 11, . k\*.‘ 1-& _ ir .,. \f,j,,,, ./- • • , rA 4_,,-- .1', . ---_/_..,414,*:‘,,,, V IL\ lit --- l'aiT* tv\-ki•N __,,,..NN‘,, ,, .---Tti \a-fili- ": ,,:,!, • - vita .I.Lt. ria i giotitN --:- 4, Iv . 1, i tzt:7A kl :.., , . It! it- 1 Mk liA41tOrii"41.N4kie.\‘ 4 j - i _i : I - • A i lit - ism \ wino i _ viroirmearjr a‘,,iitsi, . • .., 7:- r... 1 7‘. ' : - - 1114!°P.`: 11641AVIAININIIIIPAIPPIP ... , / 'Mil `i -NNE", ,- . GIN , pliii4 ;IT _ AltAiligjunk 1i /44 Ati411-41111,110eme4.1* Ii . 0- . t -__,N cti • -- gimp 4.m.fr w/ , j il : )4 .. N wirrtift aily."_ sular.,(ijoik. ..4 'Ili v villrEli la . 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION r .'1�1i'14 i5 ,.3.4�' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ry,• 17� 3.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES • -w �prr w 0 1 2 3 S 6 7 a Mlles ( o r c.. 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 -6� 1/90 VIII EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Due to the sensitivity of this site, a significant erosion control plan has been developed. The site sensitivity is caused by the moderately steep slopes, Alderwood type soils subject to erosion and the proximity of a series of downhill wetlands . The basic erosion control measures include the following: 1 . rock pad construction entrance 2 . identified clearing limits 3 . strategically placed silt fencing 4 . hydroseeding and mulching of disturbed areas not being paved. In addition to these primary measures, more significant erosion control facilities include a 6, 600 cu. ft . sedimentation pond. This sediment pond was designed using the method outlined in the K.C. SWM Manual . A 12" perforated riser pipe will discharge flow from the pond. A network of interceptor ditches, rock check dams and temporary culverts will direct the surface runoff into the pond. The interceptor ditches will be constructed at the sides of future roads throughout the plat . The sediment pond is at the site of the permanent drainage detention pond. The following calculations, diagram and table show the process for designing the sedimentation pond. CITY OF RENTON c -� • rmIL Planning/Building/Public Works iu a is i � +► Mill Avenue South g Renton, Washington 98055 JUL 2 2'9 8 = W 0 2 9 S � CC CC ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED PBMOTw, 71505,44 U.S. POSTAGE JUL et Pi u LANG Pig ON & AS SO 0 441998 Po B r o ` -, Eng`n�� RL ,.� Federal '�'q9pe4oze � � hg e;: �c�A�p�N I\ "�jp G p90FR tip.:» $ © CITY OF RENTON R i � ��;, � . ., # , NAL Planning/Building/Public Works ,�, / ; i �,,,, Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055• 0 4" " JUL 2 2'll 8ttressial : ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED • ¢ ¢ 1' aka • 0� 'i 3 9 8 9�F�1_P �T n� Robert & Lucy Scoverski 10021 SE 169th P1 Renton WA 98055 EG/..",...-m, Tlr �)f;£;>SED w RETURN TO SENDER .17 ?t y ,91 PA'3 Iililli??1?II44i? ?4!? ?li?f!?1?IFII{?ii?i?i??II?!?kli!k4dli lttl' 4 211110100 ��!.` 111uu,, \�y�"""�1a ti..�M I u;�! B-twelve Associates, Inc. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT TALBOT HILL TRUNK - O'CONNER PLAT OFFSITE STORMDRAIN CITY OF RENTON WETLAND ANALYSIS & RESTORATION REPORT PREPARED FOR SOOS CREEK SEWER DISTRICT do IIEDGES & ROTH ENGINEERING, INC 14450 NE 29TH PLACE, SUITE 101 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98007 BY B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES INC. RFCE VFn 1103 WEST MEEKER STREET, SUITE C KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 FEB 2 :I 1998 DEVEWNIwciv I t'LANNING CITY OF RENTON SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 JO B#96-130 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C • Kent, WA 98032-5751 • (2(16) 859-0515 • Fax (206) 852-4732 • tt II IIIIIJVu��iou ���nil�V `+ ;k=hD�' 13-twelve Associates, Inc. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT TALBOT HILL TRUNK - O'CONNER PLAT OFFSITE STORMDRAIN CITY OF RENTON WETLAND ANALYSIS & RESTORATION REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This report describes jurisdictional wetlands and streams located along the proposed Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Talbot Hill Trunk, in the City of Renton, Washington (the "site" - see Exhibit A). Specifically, the site consists of a 15 foot sanitary sewer and 10 foot storm drain permanent easement running approximately 1,930 feet to the east from Talbot Road South, to the proposed O'Conner Plat located on the west side of SR 515. The site is located in Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of W.M., King County, Washington. The site is located along a west facing hillside and is bordered by residential homes along the north and west. The south side of the site is comprised of deciduous forest and wetland. This forested area is located along the north side of the abandoned underground Spring Glen coal mine workings. Evidence of this past use is present in the form of coal mine tailings on the soil surface just south of manhole 668-3. Two (2) forested Category 2 wetlands and three (3) Category 3 wetlands were delineated along the site. 1.2 Proposed Use This project proposes to construct approximately 1,930 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sanitary sewer main extension and 1,640 linear feet of 12 inch off-site storm drain, both with associated appurtences. This project will provide gravity sanitary sewer service and off-site storm drainage to the O'Conner Plat, a single family residential subdivision. The project also includes temporary erosion control measures. 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C • Kent, WA 98032-5751 • (206) 859-0515 • Fax (206) 852-4732 Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 2 2.0 r 1ETIIODOLOGY The wetland boundaries along the site were delineated by Ed Sewall of B-twelve on April 29, 1996. Two of the wetlands along the alignment were located by B-twelve for the O'Conner Plat in September, 1995. Wetland and data points delineated in April 1996 were subsequently surveyed by Hedges & Roth Engineering, Inc. (see Exhibit B). Wetlands previously delineated for the O'Conner Plat were surveyed by Thomas Land Surveying. The wetlands on site were identified using methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). This is the methodology currently recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The 1987 Federal Manual requires the use of the three parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators or wetland hydrology between 5%-12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the King County Soil Survey (Snyder et al. 1973-see Exhibit C), the National Wetlands Inventory Map (see Exhibit D) and the City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory. Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 3 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Existing Site Documentation. 3. 1.1 Soil Survey According to the Soil Survey for King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973), the entire site is mapped as containing Alderwood (AgC) soils (see Exhibit C). Alderwood soils are a moderately well drained soil and are not considered hydric soils according to the publication Hydric Soils of the United States (USDA NTCHS Pub No.1491, 1991). However, areas mapped as AgC may contain inclusions of hydric soils. Our observations of the soils on the site indicate that soils in this area do not generally match the description of the Alderwood series. Disturbance from past mining activities may be one reason for the discrepancy from the soil survey. 3.1.2 National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWI) According to the NWI map for the site, there are no wetlands or streams on or near the site (see Exhibit D). 3.1.3 City of Renton Wetland Inventory According to the City of Renton Wetland Inventory, there are no wetlands or streams mapped on the site (see Exhibit E). 3.2 Field Observations A sloping hillside covered by mature third growth deciduous forest covers the majority of the site. The westernmost 820 feet of the site is comprised of an old gravel road approximately 10-15 feet in width. This road is bordered by a driveway on the north and forest on the south. Some fill had been placed during the construction of the road bed. As previously mentioned, historic disturbance of this area includes work associated with the Spring Glen coal mine. Although this was a subsurface working, it appears that substantial surface disturbance also occurred. Coal tailings are present along the south side of the west end of the site in the vicinity of Wetland "A". The site contains several hillside seep type wetlands located in sloping swales where groundwater discharges at the surface. These wetlands are interspersed with upland dominated by big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) and scattered Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii). Indian plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), snowberry (Syntphoricatpos albus), sword fern (Polystichum mtrnitum) and stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) are common understory Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 4 component of the upland areas. Soil pits excavated within the upland areas revealed gravelly sandy loams with soil profiles similar to those described for the Alderwood series. These contrast with those excavated within the wetland areas which are comprised of a mottled clay loam. A total of five (5) wetland areas were identified and delineated on-site. 3.2. 1 Wetlands All wetlands on the site share a similar hydrologic regime in that they all appear to have at least some groundwater discharge supporting the wetland. In addition, all of the wetlands have a gravelly clay-loam soil that is relatively impermeable and allows water to stay near the surface long enough to allow wetland plants and soils to develop. All of these wetlands are side hill "seep" type wetlands with groundwater discharging or lensing out of the hillside at the uphill edge of the wetlands, and flowing out onto the relatively impermeable substrate of the wetland. The following is a description of each of the wetlands delineated in this study. WETLAND "A" Wetland "A" is a large forested wetland that encroaches onto the western half of the alignment. This wetland was delineated with flags Al-A15. In addition, the easternmost end of the wetland again crosses the alignment. This portion of the wetland was delineated with three (3) flag lines, X1-X5, YI-Y8 and C1-C6. Wetland "A" on-site is vegetated with a canopy of Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) on the east and a mix of ash and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) on the west. Understory species included pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), tall buttercup (Ranunculus acris), dock (Rumex crispus), nightshade (Solanum dulcamera), lady fern (Athyriun filix femina.), hedge nettle (Stachys coolyae) and field horsetail (Equisetuni arvense). Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed a gravelly clay loam soil with a matrix chroma between 1-2 and distinct mottling. Soils were saturated to the surface during our investigation. Wetland "A" continues off-site to the south for an undetermined distance: Water within the wetland appears to eventually reach a ditch and flow into a culvert under Talbot Road approximately 100 feet south of Manhole 668-1. As previously mentioned, Wetland "A" contains portions of the Spring Glen coal mine. From the US Bureau of Mines information, it appears that the main portal of the mine was located just south of flags A 1-A5. This area currently contains a large clearing covered with emergent vegetation growing on a clay loam substrate that appears to contain coal tailings. We believe the coal mine operations has altered the surface soils as well as the surface water drainage in this area. It is possible that this area would not have been considered wetland prior to the coal mining operations. Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton►/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 5 According to the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), this wetland would be classified as PFO1E (palustrine, forested, deciduous, seasonally flooded/ saturated). According to the criteria described in the City of Renton Ordinance No. 4346 (Chapter 22 Wetland Management), Wetland "A" appears to meet the criteria of a Category 2 wetland due to large size and headwater location. Category 2 wetlands located within the urban areas typically have a 50 foot buffer measured from the wetland edge. However, since the area within the delineation from flags A 1-A 15 has been substantially disturbed in the past form the mining activities, this portion could be interpreted as meeting the criteria of a Category 3 wetland. This interpretation has been agreed upon by the City. Therefore, those portions of Wetland A to the east of flag A 15 are considered Category 2 and those west of A 15 are considered Category 3. WETLAND "B" Wetland "B" is a small, disturbed and hydrologically isolated forested wetland that was delineated with wetland flags Bl-B9 and Cl-C6. This wetland is similar to Wetland "A" in vegetation, soils and hydrologic setting. A large stand of manna grass (Glyceria spp.) is located within an opening on the northern end of this wetland. Soil pits excavated within the wetland revealed a clay loam A-horizon with a soil color of 10YR 2/1 to a depth of 10 inches. The underlying B-horizon is comprised of a sandy clay loam with a matrix color of 2.5Y 4/2 with distinct and prominent mottling. All pits within the wetland were saturated to the surface and some areas contained up to 1 inch of surface water iti shallow depressions. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), this wetland would be classified as PFOIE (palustrine, forested, deciduous, seasonally flooded/ saturated). According to the criteria described in the City of Renton Ordinance No. 4346 (Chapter 22 Wetland Management), Wetland "B" appears to meet the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, isolated and altered soil and vegetation. Typically, Category 3 wetlands in the urban areas have 25 foot buffers measured from the wetland edge. WETLAND "D" Wetland "D" is an isolated, 1,429ft= scrub-shrub wetland that appears to have some soil disturbance and minor clearing. This wetland was flagged with flags D1-D6 and is located in a shallow depression on the hillside. The entire area around this wetland has an overstory of Oregon ash mixed with bigleaf maple, snowberry, Himalayan blackberry, creeping blackberry (Ruhus uisinus) and sword fern (Polystichum Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 6 Wm). The wetland area itself is dominated by a sparse overstory of alder saplings with an understory mix of manna grass, speedwell, bentgrass, and hedge nettle (Stachys coolyae). Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed a mottled clay loam with a matrix color of 10YR 2/1. Soils were saturated at a depth of 6 inches in the wetland. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), this wetland would be classified as PSS1C (palustrine, scrub-shrub, deciduous, seasonally flooded). According to the criteria described in the City of Renton Ordinance No. 4346 (Chapter 22 Wetland Management), Wetland "D" appears to meet the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, isolating and heavily altered (grazed) vegetation. Category 3 wetland <5,000ft2 are not regulated. Therefore, Wetland "D" appears to be a non-regulated wetland. WETLAND "F" Wetland "F" is a small, hydrologically isolated excavated pond that has developed wetland characteristics over time. This 802ft= excavation is approximately 6 feet lower than the surrounding soil surface. The bottom of the excavation contained 3 inches of standing water. A shallow ditch enters the east side of the pond with its source being a livestock watering basin located uphill to the east. The edge of the pond is vegetated with pacific willow, sitka willow (Salix sitchensis) and individuals of manna grass and smartweed (Polygonum persicaria) growing in the understory. The soil within the bottom of the excavation consists of a coarse sandy loam with a color of 10YR 3/1 with mottles. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), this wetland would be classified as PSS1C (palustrine, scrub-shrub, deciduous, seasonally flooded). According to the criteria described in the City of Renton Ordinance No. 4346 (Chapter 22 Wetland Management), Wetland "F" appears to meet the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, isolation and high level of human caused disturbance. Category 3 wetlands < 5,000ft= are not regulated. Therefore, Wetland "F" appears to be a non-regulated wetland. 4.0 FUNCTIONS AND VALUES Overall functional value of the wetlands on-site is low-moderate due to the past disturbance and close proximity of residential development. However, all of these wetlands provide some value as habitat for human-tolerant species of wildlife and Wetlands "A" and "B" provide relatively good forested habitat for many species. Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 7 Wetland "A" provides hydrologic support for downstream wetlands and stream. None of these wetlands has any significant stormwater storage capacity due to their slope location. 5.0 REGULATIONS In addition to City of Renton wetland regulations previously described for wetlands and streams, certain activities (filling and dredging) within "waters of the United States" may fall under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). The ACOE regulates all discharges into "waters of the United States" (wetlands) under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. Discharges (fills) into isolated and headwater wetlands up to 2.0 acres are permitted under the various Nationwide Permits. Wetlands adjacent to streams with mean annual flows >5cfs and other waters of the United States may be considered "adjacent" and would require going through the Individual Permit process. However, the Corps has requested that all consultants refrain from making recommendations as to whether a wetland is isolated, headwaters or adjacent. These determinations can only be made by the Corps. 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS AND CONCEPT MITIGATION 6.1 Proposed Impacts The proposed sewer and storm drainage project includes the temporary disturbance of 803ft2 of Category 2 wetland, 4,699ft2 of Category 3 wetland, 2,321ft2 of Category 2 wetland buffer and 10,909ft2 of Category 3 wetland buffer. All disturbance including temporary spoil pile placement will occur within the 20 foot wide temporary construction easement. 6.2 Conceptual Mitigation The proposed project has been located to create the least impact on wetlands and buffers that was possible. Still, the wetland and buffer impacts previously described cannot be avoided. Other than 802ft2 of category 2 wetland, the rest of the disturbance has been limited to disturbed category 3 wetland and its buffer. The existing wetlands proposed to be impacted by this project are groundwater slope type wetlands that are very difficult to create: Conversely, restoring these same wetlands in their existing location is a relatively easy proposal. Since this project is located within an easement there is little room for creating wetlands and none that would likely be successful. Unfortunately, the City of Renton Ordinance asks for restoration of wetlands at a ratio greater than that disturbed (ratios of 1:1-1:3 for this project). Since it is not possible to Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/i196-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 8 create more wetlands on this site due to the limitations of the easement, we are proposing to restore the disturbed wetlands and buffers to a condition equal to, and in many areas, greater than those that exist today. This is standard practice in almost every other local jurisdiction, and, we have had great success in restoring these areas as well as maintaining and increasing wetland functions and area. Therefore, we are proposing to take the wetland and buffer areas that are disturbed during the construction process, and restore them to their original grades and contours. These areas will be re-planted with a dense mix of native tree and shrub species to restore the native plant community. Species utilized in this restoration will mirror those in the existing native communities. Species to be utilized in this restoration will include Oregon ash, big leaf maple, western red cedar, pacific willow, salmonberry, snowberry, indian plum, red-osier dogwood, black hawthorn, western crabapple and nootka rose. If you have any questions regarding this report, please call us at (206) 859-0515. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates, Inc. 4- wetieopNo ao %� �i y Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist File:Ed/96130WA.doc ,PO � Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/#96-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 9 REFERENCES B-twelve Associates, Inc. October 20, 1995. O'Conner Plat, City of Renton Wetland Analysis Report. Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79-31, Washington, D. C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dryness. 1987. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. OSU Press. Golet, F.C. 1979. "Rating the wildlife value of northeastern freshwater wetlands", pages 63-73. In P.E. Greeson, J.R. Clark, and J.E. Clark, eds., Wetland functions and values: The state of our understanding. Amer. Water Res. Assoc., Minn. MN. 674 pp. Hitchcock, C. and A. Cronquist. 1976. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Jones and Stokes Associates, City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory, June 1991. King County Sensitive Areas Folio Maps. Kulzer, L., 1990. Water Pollution Control Aspects of Aquatic Plants. Seattle Metro, 38p. Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA Misc. Publ. No. 1491. Reed, P., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). 1988. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Inland Freshwater Ecology Section, St. Petersburg, Florida. Talbot Hill Trunk/Renton/1196-130 B-twelve Associates, Inc. September 24, 1996 Page, 10 Reed, P.B. Jr. 1993. 1993 Supplement to the list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USFWS supplement to Biol. Rpt. 88(26.9) May 1988. Renton City of, Ordinance #4346, Chapter 32, Wetland Management. Snyder, D., P.. Gale, and R. Pringle. 1973. Soil Survey King County Area Washington. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. EXHIBIT A: Vicinity Map • riL"I' fi 4�'Y 't. s61N sT ___RI .r " sr 1 nu r ti T of s tN sl 4+j=%1`:'z ' b x s IrH cr Z 1• 4smr 1G�OT. ' 3 • f i�el" eL i— _C t>R i i ST SW i yN N VILLAGE �' r""` ..Y°i� 1's q L H "G� . S RENTON YILIAGE Pl. / S 111x St •� NE R/d, ST—- het mu �7 m '`rrf �)' 9 TP I . z 1deo 20 ' �� sw 17 I r: ,61N v ' QV/ •s. 4. 16TH ST x t Q fy 6 ' 3 4' 16TH ST iii.4; II- S isms'Sr a : c x 1 r] oR5 . 4- a 16 c~ f Q` N - � 5-7 .n � ,\J lr \. Stt-� j6�,�� �1 __� ��f TSg QQ 1 1 -ltt'TH"SI M1 -rt �J'1rI^ ►p r� -R } h j:. M iu.nSteTH7 � ---Sr :'oSI xm `....p q< t0 :S.,SM 19TH S7 '" `1+N` I '" `y��`z s'u♦ o\%11t >__WI Gus I9TH SI, 43/TAW; \ `'�MlXl4 rL ty,•;4 si 21 s 'S1Es k3.if LjI� 'y lur„8n1•Pig '-+�+• • S a `6 0 m '.. q'x:;'4:s._. �I� r N„ PUGET �� s��•R)..N i r` v`-I (tl • fi, 71P dyn 11 .e b 3_I < $ r,wn .n .P a i _'ast tlsr s' .=1r 601Ni bt: I} �^ SW 23t0)ST S 23RD ST 1-+--7r --- J.f\� I 1 g, ru v MID 1 1 1 N'N iy >'$-1 Lii 1: i 1 'csxir. 2. S 6 ^I 1628225_—SE_ .IK 1 I < E. l0*,s1 n :�- •\. .v.:•._" 1 .:I SC lR4T11 + ST i Q�t H 27TH_ I ST •b `- rr4 s )I 1 S 27TH ST—NI t��--E-•---rlllW SE 1641111 --¢} s if:, IM rts11 '" p i1 S trn-STrc ."8 sr•4\ 70 I x T.% Q�,,,`i e� Jac 0,� \`.�'1��'�'r-16611, s7 C ?SIMi S, <'I '^1 ,n,Si as,,,,r%iF'}f;S. I 2_ ST �•ri- + rr 1;CS W�"- fs[,am si 4.+ `I u 166i7,�(il .�� • fob` : I 1- < Fla i7E6 J 611--ST-- \ S 3157 SI '7iTzr < < 7_ _` _-` - I a> r I yL {. II. 7 i ,.- n < a ► I S7 169111I t sr Iry •• ♦i kI �1 I SS-11701H ST s1 -♦y, 4.,i w iF 1 i AV -*g- -- -aia 1r; ,71 yn 1/711 I Si • n - >rM SI S W „Ls .SE 1___ I HD "ST I. _ . €r;_. 8p —. Sf 72N0 sl I 0 /` v, \ '1 - r 109651• !\Ol♦1 SE 172ND sr_,.`� P•••Wi• I i 5,, R all 51� .3 st PAD t` 1 y „ss N;s.5 I + ._ l Snr , 311 SI S ` Usl nviN-Sr`. ISr ,^,, An .J: I p SC ossir a I101 51 AI 91 3jnH ST _ cr 7 T G : SI - I I! i- 1 l l SE 176Td ST - / Ir. ` 41ST ST Si �: L:.:• s.11 :1 x� E 5 r". §^ I I s 17an :1Y 7ri I SW u.'' ~P£ e' 6; �1 a."Ia.— .. 6I` I 1 0l. 1 iii NORTH B-twelve Associates,Inc. II' ~ 1�I ; Reproduced with permission granted by'THOMAS BROS.MAPS. \ \` / �� This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS. It is unlawful Ecological Systems Design& Management ®® to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof,whether for personal use or resale,without permission. 1103 W.Meeker St.,Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 Fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 96-130 Date: 4'10.96 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DIST. Drawn by: 6kS Scale: ♦vo.,e TALBOT IIILL TRUNK Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENTON, WA EXHIBIT B: • WETLAND MAP Off-site edge undetermined. l / \ rDtr ��_ ,w tags: Y$ rA e.7 ... 0 6- -- F... x ( y 1 .:,c 3 i JI 9p�� 'JF'i :. Off-site edge undetermined O s ..:b...... B-twll!l euf0o�[lS.Inc- �� ......... .... ?eolosneal Systems Destgn&Management 1103 W.Meese(St..Sate.C • Kent.WA 9803 (2061859-051< Fu(:061832-173. Off-sue edge undaermi i i ' SOOS CREEK WATER&SEWER DIST. TALBOT HILL TRUNK CITY OF RENTON, WA !l l i I NORTH Jobs: 96-i3o Dare: i� 9$ Drawn bv:lies Scaie:B /" - Revised: Checked bv: Base map provided to B-twelve by Hedges&Roth Engineers EXHIBIT C: Soils Map Base map per Soil Survey, King County Area Washington, (Snyder et al. 1973). ...../mP� :•• _ . • .p Sc r y A O/ . .—m' • 1, ,,<,,,_/ / ".:•.., • ' *), : ce Ivor Wo `irWfir 1•a ur '� Int; to 11 -, IA.:0, . • ...,...z.„,„*. I Ur I I •A•If� !, . • _ , • i, , .. \\Y--- AgC •A16 �, ! 91�� .A. ,i� g /1 ._.\4 li A:I — I Ur Pu 1•. • ni9' S. • . 114. -I I P •. .. ..['. n$1 • �iii I_ - • 4ii' [ AeC J y ---)"7--- I WEI 1 :e on .■IIIMINO ( III:iI Ur • )1 '- , / I ```_ , I Ur W 1 orl /fig ❑ a:s rvoir .�! t02 -T / hi Sk `�/1 _ • . Wo :M 1�� _—_ . ..1 • U _�_ 1• BM 29: l69 j2AgC • • •• • •�t-1 . .. o eSk 1, ` •J 1S"Il i' '=r• _... . , • • . -.... II dry[ Tu , — I � 'I �_�+1-1 k,�� 1 , < .IT NORTH B twelve Associates,Inc. \'�,` ,••1= Ecological Systems Designanagement iiiii Sc&1103 W.Meeker St.,Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 Fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 94-/3O Date: a./0.94. SODS CREEK WATER & SEWER DIST. Drawn by: fkS Scale: i''..^-t- TALBOT HILL TRUNK Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENTON, WA - EXHIBIT D: National Wetlands Inventory Map . ill p ... ,::-- 1 f IF:\ ' 1 . JBH I ■ ct��' n --y � -;ir4 • I • %� --* 1 PE1ic t ', �/ ' ' _ �� _ ,.....„.„...... ....=.5... .--_01--0.- ;,. ...4 p- 11 -s-,,„ ' • It . ••6 :..-•'-- ". r' �.���yyyy1.�'. °Snk • u .i‘.1 ` ,11 \� . \ A ,f :; PEAK PSSF ivFoc__ it PE stf..., + \\, . t)• - I PSSF rtksk.•�5y~I t ;_IPSSGPUBK s � :. Al As �— - . -� ---- PSSF _-►- ill!1 ,:. / �rP11-- `` �4��.PFOGB tes voirPEMC l:' t I:& J ' •sp pFOAPFOC X • • I M 'naa o PSSC P yF I J 3(� �• �yau'l t— ,j 1�� PEMA • \\ 'SC I , P'• .: Ii: z •t .. ; PEMC ` �_ NORTH B•tweive Associates,Inc. ~ ~- NWI quadrangle: ZeN 71-9"1 4/4 CIO Mapping Date: /98ar ` Ecological Systems Design&Management 1103 W.Meeker St..Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 Fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 96-/3 o Date: G./0-96 Drawn b E k5 Scale: .Iro.✓� SODS CREEK WATER & SEWER DIST. y TALBOT HILL TRUNK Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENTON, WA EXI-IIBIT E: CITY OF RENTON CRITICAL AREAS INVENTORY WETLANDS AND STREAM CORRIDORS 19 . () \i ' _7 ) 1$. :)\ . ....• • "--; w 7 K, _,_____, • 'At—4 • . .\ 1 ., /-= ''.. :.:.:...:•:.:.( 7 <:•:•-.777:17:1— i ...... ._,,, ID' •:•: : :;.....-i,S;1( .' J \ \ ( i: ,0 . c-rc,4 3, \ N . . . . . : :.: . . . . . . .: :•:•:•: :•: A , . . . . : : :•:-ii-41•.• :•. !:.:-:•:-:,:- • ". . . . . . . . , 1• ....:..-L," . \ .1 ..- 4 1 • 71 --/ . .... .. . SITE ,w_3./-; .. / . • • - ,,D • • . •.. • [ • • • •. . . C - - c_-_,L) •,_.; [ z-----)‘----\ —wir SE lItth Sr •,-- 1 //) * r-1 t-LX 5-28 i — ill' I ialk,_,„1 NORTH B-twelve Associates,Inc. 711 .--7" ITO Ecological Systems Design& Management 1103 W.Meeker St.,Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 Fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 94-,3 c' Date: 6•40 •,6 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DIST. Drawn by: fie.5 Scale: ,i-..—c. TALBOT IIILL TRUNK Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENTON, WA WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Army Caps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: 14 4it12.1 7%-v,,k Job#: 9ti"/30 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: 4' ZT "9G Jurisdiction: TZ4••rt01.' State: t.Aor Sample Point #: DP# / Wetland: fi Atypical areas analysis: Problem areas analysis: Niv VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. �/r /.�S��J�� ♦T Fmcw 40 2. A rrNr j 1. C / r4-C 1 , 2 t/ 3. 2 E _r arse,: /cam s FAC tJ -s u 4. Pry st. /J. , S S F.q lIr� 2 5. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 5 Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met _Y�e Ni) Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: 6l44'"'•`J On I lydric Soils List?: Yes 1a Drainage Class: ("1 1^J1 Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Texture 4'in. /o-It 2/I /" /.•,., in. in. in. Indicators present:_histosol,_histic epipedon,_sulfidic odor, mule moisture regime,_reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions high surficial organic content,_organic streaking, k mottling Hydric soil criteria met: qsk No Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGYe. .i Inundated:&N Depth of Standing water: T Saturated: N Depth to saturated soil: ' 'r Indicators present:_inundated,_saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits _drainage patterns,_oxidized rh•zospheres,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRlT IA Hydropliytic vegetationcy/N etland hydrology /N Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: No COMMENTS: tile:ed/datag7.doc WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Amy Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: A//J ,e) T�--tt Job#: 76 130 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: if'-z - 94 Jurisdiction: le State: w* Sample Point#: DP# 3 Wetland: �J�� d s P- Atypical areas analysis: 74) t/ Problem areas analysis: r� VEGETATION Dominant plant sppecies Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. /), +px^..YS• o/. Fi9-L 2. T.,—.,r < < r ofRi• FAct/ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: /ry Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes(g3 Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: ff 4.4- -•6.1 On Ilydric Soils List?: Yes(a Drainage Class: Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Texture 8 in. /0`/2 "Li/ h e f e.A 7...As, /o s�—►/ in. in. Indicators present:_histosol,_histic epipedon,_sulfidic odor,_aquic moisture regime,_reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions,_high surficial organic content _organic streaking, _mottling Hydric soil criteria met: Yes No Basis: ,,,5 s) • Le I Comments: HYDROLOG Inundated: Y% , Depth of Standing water: Saturated:(g/N Depth to saturated soil: indicators present:_inundated,_saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits _drainage patterns,_oxidized rFh' spheres, water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met:O No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF'CRITEXIA Hydrophytic vegetation:0VI Ilydric soils: Y/N . etland hydrology:t N Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?:alTA No COMMENTS: 1(k:u1 data87_doc WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: / 16&* Tr'• 1t Job#: '9 r 3 0 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: 'r 1 Jurisdiction: Rwl"s-- State: ("bA• Sample Point #:_DP# 2— Wetland: 4- Atypical areas analysis: A.- Problem areas analysis: A Id VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % I. 2..6..1 d.; ;,),r- S /SAG t) s� 2. Sir-pPla..„we,s I S F4 3. s.,1,i /�;.. A-. 7 F`#41 c t-J 4. r . jf it-A d 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 4% Hydrophytic vegetation criteria ntet:0 No Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: /1/ --,j On Ilydric Soils List?: Yes go) Drainage Class: v Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Teture� /o'/rL z/I t7 c} c .. to in. in. in. Indicators present:_histosol, histic epipedon,_Zsulfidic odor,_aquic moisture regime,_reducing conditions, _gleying, concretions high surficial organic content,_organic streaking, X mottling Hydric soil criteria met:MP No Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGI Inundated: Y/ Depth of Standing water: Saturated: )N Depth to saturated soil: g Indicators present:_inundated, saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits _drainage patterns,_oxidized r 'zospheres,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: an No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Ilydrophytic vegetation: N Hydric soils:t N etland hydrolog4AN Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Mr No COMMENTS: Tom:cd/dita87.doc WETLAND I)E'I'ERMINATION DATA FORM (US Amy Cops of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Januaty 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: • T41 L o) I Job#: /b-l3O Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: 1- z Jurisdiction: State: 1N4 Sample Point#: DP#-9 Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: /moo Problem areas analysis: nio VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. ref+-4.•-S rA�hi 2. / -. I,'l,4 3. 5;6., C, S (n oIe L.: // /1'C,-✓ 4. piv�,.)+, .- or✓a.s a N' VA(' 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: /oV Hydrophytic vegetation criteria me Yes o Marginal Comments: SOILS Q J Mapped Soil Series: / 1 ' On Ilydric Soils List?: Yes(/ Drainage Class: C-'l Depth(0 in) Matrix cold Mottle color Texture 2.S `/ 4f z_ y e s s—,27 c l? - /o in. in. in. Indicators present:_histosol,_histic epipedon,_sultidic odor,_aquic moisture regime,_reducing conditions, _gleying,_concretions _ high surficial organic content,_organic streaking, A mottling Hydric soil criteria met:an No Basis: Comments: HYUROLOGI Inundated: YLW Depth of Standing water: SaturatecJ"N Depth to saturated soil: S‘i r Indicators present:_inundated, Ysaturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits _drainage patterns,_oxidized rhjzospheres,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met is No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Hydrophytic vegetation. Hydric soils Y N etland hydrology//N, Data point meets the cri eria of a jurisdictional wetland?: a?9 No COMMENTS: )•ile:ed/dal sr.aa WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM • (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: 114uN t "�^'� Job#: 9G-t3 a Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: 4•z`) (- Jurisdiction: Qi i e' State: Sample Point#: DP# Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: r-- Problem areas analysis: No VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. Cr cc, f 1�/�_� 2. cvi J1 i 1^ f. N • �Tti�./ 3. 4. • 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: •''‘) Hydrophytic vegetation criteria tnet es No Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: 74/4 On Hydric Soils List?: YescNc� Drainage Class: R 1AID Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Texture �D in. /O`/tL -Z// — l /. ��'�, in. in. Indicators present:_histosol,_histic epipedon,_sulfidic odor,_aquic moisture regime, reducing conditions, _gleying, concretions, high surficial organic content,_organic streaking, x mottling Hydric soil criteria met: es No Basis: Comments: V HYDROL��•�•l !/ Inundated �`Cn'V• Depth of Standing water: 1 Saturated: N, Depth to saturated soil: SIr1 2—C-- Indicators present:A inundated,-c saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits drainage patterns, oxidized r • ospheres, water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: es No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRIT IA Hydrophytic vegetation Y Hydric soils Y 1 etland hydrologyr /N Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: AV No COMMENTS: t•ik:ed/dala87.doc • WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: • T..ji.E,I t r y Job#: Cl tv'13 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: `f z 9 -96 Jurisdiction: TLa 4 State: iN Sample Point//: DP# G Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: r.4 Problem areas analysis: R/d VEGETATION DominantT� yolant species ) Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. ,12 .b.-s 2. 1. li/,4 -7— 1'"A1Cc._/ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes N<Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: �/ ""`'J On Hydric Soils List?: Yes�Nj Drainage Class: Lip Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Texture 2.4in. /U'//2 1.4 9s L In. in. in. Indicators present:_histosol,_histic epipedon,_suluidic odor, mule moisture regime,_reducing conditions, _gleying,_concretions,_hi surficial organic content,_organic streaking, _mottling Hydric soil criteria met: Yes eon Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGY Inundated: Y I0 Depth of Standing water: Saturated:la Depth to saturated soil: Indicators present:_inundated,_saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits _drainage patterns,_oxidized rhizos;_ISr�es,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Hydrophytic vegetation: Y/N .7 Hydric soils: YVNO Wetln hydrology: Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes o COMMENTS: r ti:eai1.(287.a<x *****************************************************15********** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 02/20/98 13 : 35 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9801024 Amount : 15 . 36 02/20/98 13 : 35 Payment Method: CASH Notation: J. JAEGER Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-026 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 515 . 36 This Payment 15 . 36 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 515 . 36 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 15 . 36 1 RECORDS TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMEN /DIVIS�LION DATE PREP. TRANSMITTED BY: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE C`e► 1-Z-O( (3 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED B : DATE REC'D APPROVAL: LOCATION BOX NO. RECORD SERIES TITLE INCLUSIVE RETENTION DESTRUCT DATES PERIOD DATE SHP-98-022 1998 PERM CU-98-023 1998 PERM SME-98-024 1998 PERM SHP-98-025 1998 PERM SHP-98-026 1998 PERM LLA-98-027 1998 PERM V-98-028 1998 PERM SHP-98-029 1998 PERM LLA-98-030 1998 PERM 1 C:\Documen ts and Settings\bsorensen\Desktop\BSorensen\transmittal2.DOC\ © CITY OF RENTON •c,,,;. ::- Planning/Building/Public Worksi; 4F1 2 VII M200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055gill F►MSTEp * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 0 4 -2 2 . 9 8 F C 0 1794156 *s.�ASTAGE * B 4&LSNGTON NORTHERN RAILRAAO 3501 E. VALLEY P.D RENTON, WA 9S05 - /q6S !ICJ DELIVERABLE .�' � IZ5360 c0zaos' AS ADDRESSED (; U'�A LE TO FORWARD Q'A. )4, RETURN TO CENCER 4 GVd/ i ?"`-.-,Q- •• ,. 11111111111111111111111111111111 iiiiisiiiimilinil1i,iiii,1„iitttlifi,i1„il G V. Sq 3e9'I93e_ .mm S. f it ��. ------.------s- --'3:1 °..,� // W .`4" i PROPOSED 3 STORY y .r• \ 88 UNIT MOTEL, 445,937 SF. § i 0 GI \: \ = IRACK 1? x rn f____.. _ GM'0I9e2 CORER OF PARRS,034' PAvfliT PAv9'ENT C.J.O•MCP.LME v'S SITE DATA. ARwtT EAvrs r,a, par WM., Mai M 9TIE: 16P12 Sq Ft MOO.FOG-��': ROW Sq Ft ASPHALT ,a/COT WALKS. 25 StS Sq Ft TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, 4lAml Sq Ft�` .'� ,+� e/IRA�CM:.aA aRw.R1 LANDSCAPES 31611 Sq Ft A]A, �Ti '--- ....Tic p ! BUILDING DATA - _, -. 1 / Imo• s,vutv�°�nn 42 .LNITSLOOR. O.AS]ea Nv n+n®Fyn ]0FL ITe /,{��\ I I 2r.FLOOR. n313 SO S PLAN I 1 •.• Y 34-WITS `\`//) 3,1 FLOOR ROW SQ SCALE,r-2D•-0' mPA�nRcnw.. a ry' 3T AL WITH MVP.. I I lNITS TOTAL: 46931 80. pg-WITS O SIDEWALK DETAIL O CURB DETAIL HANDICAP SIGN PARKING:CAP 4 re„gym') COMPACT: 31(89'x11') STANDARD. 51(9'x30') TOTAL, S3 PARKING SPACES,CN•Sin C6011P107SS:S SOOSTTORN SPECS,MIAOW Lef "1Rsr Vos.ssy N:wWNV MOFU" OM Wisnw GOF3JER5T E - Nw.°.I�.,-. SIRCCII�N.t IpR1 1A1 t @i.Q088 DATE: REVISIONS: SITE RENTON MOTEL °Ecosrrs�"uLraNTa - PLAN IIIRFIMmsewsrminvE _ ..a ��� RENTON, MOTEL '"` �e. ""�' -"' CONSULTANTS MC SQUARED surer �� - �hlvte • «A M -- T 'II! Q (I) i@ CSAc Jack lL $ CO I I cMcFadden ' EAST VALLEY Hwy p m I i Zr_i J. V. Farrell m B MOTEL,N i I T.y_ �'' John V Farrell 3650 E.VALLEY Hv'' 0 9��` 6 14 AG a''Nakanishi RENT011t WA`MOSS .ter as 2�.,,n„�zzs.99_---'0'° �. w Q - -- -: 96Ac: r H 34T" Sr 0 ,2 s� 510Ac j az Eb74- ,ci I 400 09 c ' 25,59 $1 '': sCR ,i a60 Gp 51'�� 3�r 1:::.�:•.: 3 91 Ac r 2 ' ;X4.Ov^'°;,0 4c Emilio ?ierot+i ?_:�; �;`) R-8 as E JS has' wprrv�1 O 8 a, i I '111` '' at��6` •- gr.�C634c. oi 6� . y a Leland a } ,• : 1324c S Wilso S.P. 378-79 �le _ ff 'R'�+j`' gZ 3463 • Ac rgap ,, —.._—_ id --- �.. _a...,, W i ../.. r 10 <: �� /]} 0 43 • -4:s338--. 3 .- / ._ • • - `�• -„ - - -J : co �': Q o,4,.(11 gm a, �o.� - --- 1Ii_ --._-� - - - 4 Y Q .,�•', hE o 4y O.5Z Ac, �43a 4C ' 0 l-i' •, 7Ti11 d�1Sm 371 49 m�c'7 U Ft r L I N G W o m l„<,4.�4 �J`�i 023Ae.37e AeI` T 0 N 403iJ CA `'�I 6.,V ` Q " ;Y"S.. 36TH ;T •I 36G4 a ti 2 4`; `1 3` 4 h� zc0 IM 3 k • S.P 014-81 yl,l ;i '���' ��.r�/��J,'�� .'.:B 0.55 0. al.Sd ® 9. AC Howard 1 I N N W CA 1':i' Hawkins J 15 1 I6 17 IB •. R ® Az. Oi T R N C: i,4.^'zreN s �J 0.5 — 3055; — — _ •! ,1 N -- _ (2) • E ..</ ;;:� 1 o (I) N _..._ _ 335 Z9 CA i..i 1:', pi -, ._3 P-1 i.,' (4) e Iss IM n 1.':' n -1110 3Sa31 80 ,.;: j 5 64 Ac •.� ''. O S.P 113-77 (3) A /8 I N O I N G S I T E PLAN w,j9 CA ::1 i`` 920 • ws /./ •:r 1•i top 10315 3 Sam Younker ' j P M 1.61 AG :.:."1Zap 1 r I h 1 ss Z *1 4 �j p, VALLEY LEY ME D I CAAL „o .---39+.27.—_—.l - a ® CA ►.:„.::1 r IC A I 6 x 3 J ,02,3 ,...,,.... ,.w 12.ee03 -1 ao ___.,.�®[(J//, ' :! I :it g CENTER s Imo., SP213 7e / / .■ • 5 SE 4 II cA NORTH CAMPUS y' BINDIN�SITE PLAN , I\ I . i --gip s KROL1. M LE R E N D NPS -- roll Maps are compiled from Of8e181 Records Surveys.They are produced for reference use 1—..—, .� BUILDING APPROX STORIES(-7 HOUSE NUMBER um E''sevore n a «r,., -,.r.e .r..« ont o....r«..;m•.q.,rr.a no warranty Is expressed or Implied. SOLE:( e200 °^���•.��^^�„. ==rc=,.,.�I .gx.,..�.y..a n r,.�.•, RAILROAD-+-0 0--*-0- •..r•.o-,..m�' w�sr.n�.,..,la,,,.�a«.� ...•. MAIN THOROUGHFARE - . L 2S ;�w'�'�w+u "+"^o v.o-x.«,•,.wN m+lw av,... --7 �- TAX LOT NUMBER ,:•-• . .. . - ... •.. "77, " 1 Tn.:: .'.' . . . . . . •. . . - . . I 0.0‹.#,.........2%.-.'.:ss',....,,...N.71 ,-- _,...... I I MOOR L.: k ,-.. I I CL:1ZI lil 1:: Cr: IL Z 11 nn c., I I . K _--. 0101513.-- 1 I ILI 1Z CO U-9-11 Z 11 sc= azonsi ,I. __ FTTTTT1 - -.--,-.-.. , , EL IL QJ ILI II) El . .., LLI 1:=1 ILI ILL MO4 1.1.004. — NORTH ELEVATION .... 9e.ele 41"•l'-ff I I r--"'''''' t.M=MIIM1.1011°. , ,...._ , _........i.,... I 0 IIII t 4? 0 I III CI 0 11= --,------- •-7 Ni Lea - .—.— .. . I ' I El El I il • I I I k ,1 ._ - .= -. = o . . . _ = o .--. --/ : 0 III El • -.----1 EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ...h.,•.••V-JV Dulv 4.•r•o• _ - __. __ I _ _ f ____ - i -si IWOR LK , Ili_ ...... .T'T-- MM.ROOM L......_ i = t1 = = = =I n = 1=1 .•=1. = - - 1= r. fa= = CLI ZI IL Z Fn = = . M El= r_:11 ILI U—KI . LI _ V.,'• I:: LJ 11;i . c—Milj liZ EMO 1;-11j in r.,•=4 — co= a) iz ‘ • .. [-IL LIJ = i 1111 , LI LO ILI , • SOUTH ELEVATION . . . .. , . - • .. .__ ._ __ 0 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL BEST WESTERN COWER:37011E ,•••,,/... ' . . DATE,• ,P ItEVISSIONER EXTERIOR RENTON MOTEL DE9IGN ...L.2, CC:Neu:WM .......-• - -.VJ 1 IIIIIMIIMS MARC1-1 .., ELEVATION „„,„,,,i4,, .-.--::•. ..1_-Tth.T-_4: .._"-." . ms stir son'" - 1,na REI•FTON, WASHINGTON 'z' etolliLtilil* , ....,..., ,,... ,- .ouns is- — •—--.-' Dag"/11.111/11.1;;,...., nu; ,,NUAREIY; a.natc or so i — 17.0 ._.. . , .0.• ,•t• ' • ( ZLINGTON NoKrHERN 'RDRD Ex15T6RIE THEATRE,SjJC. 35ot E. VALLEY RA go Sw TRYwR. 5T ttic° (ZEnrrm i WA 4iw05S PORT NO,0R 97Z 05 s4 5 U '` tz536C0 3o03 l bps GAPTECH NE 5 SC PROPERTY HowI,NGS,INL. 3750 E. VAL 418-ail-- 3600 E. VALLEy 'K0. RairON, WA REtvroms t.JA 58°55 302305g06t04 30Z 305915405 r cocm ; ��na .< "EMT VALLEY HWI IZ Farrell ✓ G MOTEL" " ", John V Fa-rtl1 - 3650 E.VAU[Y NwY 3HY St c w a ,', 4"Fr's'F Tioss ^'% 5]Gac e \J e —� B .a° II o u tu / �i �s ,ViS �45 j )�"o:'Jac E =N ;i �Milso • ' URLINGTON &,' s ra CA ...a. _ 3rH " 7 � �I©®IM 5 „ : _- YNavi,Ins i NORTHERN ' ' SI i _ !— . In ; d R-s ��� 2 I _ CA Y ,2 ,,— I. l li 1 IM r0°I a.n .. o - BIND,. SITE PLAN ,. C L(: i „ w s a+raun'.er I 6 14 V A L L CE _ HjIM E D I LC IA L aa ® i (Al n l- M 'A irI E ' T EsRNm 52 )4 61 __5J— '!74 "f�' No... N.� a,aLF. .c.N --7,.,cA 'tabu.MAPS ':a. __*"" - saavrow' n. NA..r6o.N...1 I.,LOT....a. — • • y T • • CITY OF RENTON • awl/ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 5, 1999 Steve Yester MC Construction Consultants P.O. Box 8478 Olympia, WA 98506 SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel- LUA98-062, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Yester: Your request for a modification from parking code requirements is approved based upon the following findings: 1) Site plan condition #3 required the applicant to secure access to 8 off-site parking spaces in order to satisfy their required number of parking spaces. The applicant has demonstrated there is sufficient parking on the adjacent Nendels Motel site to satisfy the parking requirements for Nendels as well as provide for the 8 additional spaces of off-site parking needed by the East Valley Motel. 2) The property owner of East Valley Highway Motel has a legally recorded easement providing for cross-parking with Nendels Motel. 3) With satisfaction of parking requirements, it is expected that there will be more than sufficient parking to meet the needs of the two motels. Motel/hotel parking requirements are 1 space per room plus 2 parking spaces for each 3 employees. The applicant claims the normal occupancy rate is approximately 60%. If you have further questions related to site plan conditions or building permits, please contact Peter Rosen, project manager for the City on the East Valley Highway Motel. Sincerely, eff /11/1 Gregg Zimmerman Punning/Building/ Public Works Administrator 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 1 • • s MC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTAN P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAx:923-9763 ?; • March 8, 1999 Gregg Zimmerman Planning. Building and Public Works Administrator V V City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: The East Valley Highway Motel Land Use Case No. LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF Building Permit No.B980374 Dear Mr.Zimmerman, It appears that the building permit for our project has been ready to erelease e Tcept out r a lan td-s ses condition that has resurfaced. We have appreciated Mr. Rosen's help through project issue he has recommended we contact you. er the In brief: our project, an 88-room hotel, site been relocated several times to and up inraemanimade development of the surrounding area, the creek has It is now protected by 25-foot buffers, which channel along the southern property line of this property. e have posed significant challenges in designing our roject on an the creek and providing for itsready constrained felnhancement have In managed to design a feasible project while protecting t we be permitted so doing,we have asked for but one concession lieved we had been grante our 90 space min um p king requirements. to use 8 parking spaces at the adjacent Nendels Inn to satisfy This idea came up early in designing the project as there was alreadyrhe a recorded cross-parking ros -pa briagreement between the past owner of Nendels and of the subject property. agreement anticipated the channel and allowed for the customers of ne ofeproviding emergency vehiclelishment to utilize ta spaces essand turnaround was we realized that the best,perhaps only,method to connect the properties by a bridge as contemplated by the agreement. A copy of this easement was submitted with the original application. When we received our land use action decision, it contained the following condition: hat "In order to satisfy criteria for permitting s spaceste beyond theirt own, the applicant equired parking needs. site Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking P llcant shall also verify that site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applic shall provide there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. applicant this to the satisfaction of Development Services Division,prior to the issuance of building permits." We addressed this condition shortly thereafter. I spoke with Peter Rosen by phone to discuss this and the fax on June 9, 1998 a revised easement that other conditions of the land use decision. I submitted by Bement and added a provision to allow referenced and re-stated the terms of the original cross-parking agr have it smnegency vehicles access to bothS properties.wnersked that this be approved in of the proposed East Valley orm and Highway H ghwaylHot l,dhad just signed. At this time, Bill and Soo An, purchased Nendels. As the two properties were in common ownership, I could easily have any necessary easement executed. of parking s aces versus the I then obtained and submitted a site plan of Nendels 12 additional spaces. At the same tme I provided a number of rooms and employees,which demonstratedviously property map of the area,to scale,showing8 the withdjacent Peter Rosendtosrev'►ewas w the abovelsubmittalseel madelnotes up with a short meeting on June 28th, 199 Page lof4 C\My Documents\Renton Best Wcstem\Zimmerman 3-12-99.doc • Tv1C CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAx:923-9763 that the site plan showing the availability of spaces at Nendels was approved as was the area map showing the 750-foot radius from the property. In my notes I also wrote that the "new easement [is] not necessary. Fire department has standard form for emergency access easement. Get signed for both properties." I went to the fire department but no one knew where the forms were. I left a request for one to be faxed to me, which it was. I retyped it as the fax copy was not very clear and the 1" side margins required by the auditor were questionable. I had this signed by Bill and Soo An as to both properties. They recorded the document and submitted a copy to the City. I received a call from Peter Rosen that the easement would have to be reviewed by the city's attorneys for form since I had retyped it and that this process could take some time. I asked to be let known if anything further was required. The next I heard of this issue was in October as I was franticly going from department to department to expedite the handling of the final few requirements holding up the release of the permit. With the sensitivity of the creek, the weather was threatening to postpone the project for 7 or 8 months. You are aware of the complexity of permitting a hotel, especially in an unfamiliar municipality, and can appreciate that I had my hands full trying to make sure I had the all-inclusive "short-list" of requirements from the various departments and was addressing each of those items. Even in my efforts to track down such straggler requirements, I did not come across the easement problem. This was literally the last item I found out about. Suddenly I would need to revise the easement to "identify 8 particular spaces at Nendels, reserve those specifically for the use of the East Valley Highway Hotel and stipulate that these may not be used by Nendels to satisfy parking requirements for any future expansion. I was not immediately concerned about the last minute resurfacing of the easement issue or that it was suddenly much more definitive and precise in the language and terms it was to contain. I was frustrated that it would be an additional delay, but frankly, I was starting to give up on the prospect of being able to start the project anyway—things had just taken to long up to this point and the weather was turning. But when I called the An's to make arrangements to draft yet another easement I learned they had sold Nendels! Predictably, the buyer recognized this as an opportunity to hold-up the An's and demand renegotiation,remuneration,etc. The entire idea of an easement is to eliminate the need of renegotiating an agreement with every new owner of a property,as they will always demand payment if they think they can. This is whether they are actually impacted adversely by the agreement or not. In this case, there is a valid easement against his property that allows customers of the East Valley Highway to park in his parking lot and vice versa. He still has 4 additional spaces in his lot, though there is no room for him to expand his facility anyway. There would be no real additional impact on him in signing a re-worded easement. Yet, he is not required to sign a new easement and knows the An's are well-vested in the process; therefore, it becomes an opportunity to demand money. This puts the An's in a difficult position after they have spent a year and better that$200,000 in permitting the project to date and still have final fees of another$150,000 to the City of Renton to look forward to. I must ask for your help in resolving this. We were aware that an easement was necessary from the beginning. We knew that we had to satisfy Development Services as to its form -this was stated in the land use decision. We produced the easements and must take issue with how the approval process was handled. We were not aware of the specifics that came out at the last moment. We did not know that approval of our original easement had been withheld. The numerous conversations about the deficiency of the original, recorded easement which we submitted with our initial application centered around emergency access and that it did not contain the language to fulfil than requirement. I drafted a new easement that combined the parking and emergency access requirements, and asked for comments. The response again focused on the emergency access portion and that I should use the fire department's accepted form. This led me to the conclusion that otherwise the easement was acceptable, that if I executed the fire departments form as a separate easement then the original parking agreement could stand as it was. I never attempted to revise the parking agreement portion of the easement itself as I never understood it to be in question. The requirement of the land use decision said that we must satisfy development Services as to the easement prior to building permits, but that does not absolve the Department of informing us if it is withholding such approval and for what C:\My Documcnts\Renton Best Westcm\Zimmerman 3-I2-99.doc Page 2 of 4 MC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAX:923-9763 reasons. I had many discussions over a considerable period of time in which any problems or objections could have and should have been raised. I knew that not only Peter Rosen but also others had reviewed the easement. We were given no notice and no reason to believe it had not been accepted until the very last minute when we could no longer easily address the matter. I don't doubt that this was an honest mistake on the staffs part. Indeed, I have found the entire staff most helpful and responsive throughout the process. Nevertheless, we find ourselves in a tough spot and are not convinced it is of our own doing. If I had been given specific provisions the easement was to contain at the onset, or at any time during the six months in which the An's were in ownership of Nendels, I could and would have easily provided one just as I did in the case of the emergency vehicle easement. If I had at the very least been told that, despite my efforts, I still had not gained approval on the easement I would have • asked the additional questions to determine what I must do. I did what I thought was required by and acceptable to the City based on the description of the easement in the conditions of the land use decision ("a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property" — the original easement matches that description)and based on what I was told. In multiple discussions and correspondence on the issue I never was alerted to the fact that I needed to identify particular spaces or reserve them exclusively for the East Valley Highway Hotel or I would have done so. I addressed every requirement that was communicated to me. Fortunately, I think this can be fairly easily remedied. We understand that the City has its rules and requirements, which are the staffs responsibility to follow. But I also know that specific sets of circumstances can recommend a variance to them if the underlying intent of the rule and public welfare concerns are met. I believe that we have addressed all public safety and welfare concerns: there is an easement for emergency vehicles (the primary concern); there is a valid easement allowing for the customers of the East Valley Highway Hotel to park in the adjacent parking lot should the need arise. In my opinion, that the easement does not specifically identify the 8 spaces and reserve them for the sole use of the East Valley Highway Hotel is certainly of far lesser,if any,consequence. From the standpoint of having adequate parking for guests,there is justification for leniency. The 8 spaces in question would rarely, if ever,be needed. The hotels in the area have not historically pushed capacity. I have enclosed an excerpt from a recent appraisal of our project that estimates the average occupancy of several comparable hotels. Perhaps the best comparable project is the adjacent Nendels Inn. During the period in which the An's owned the Inn the occupancy rate was less than 60%. The attached revenue report from Nendels covering the years of 1994 through 1997 indicates that this has been the norm. The parking space requirements of the City of Renton are based on 100%occupancy plus additional spaces for personnel. Several municipalities with which we are familiar have parking requirements with formulas based more on those average occupancy rates, like one space per 80% of the rooms. Franchises such as Comfort Inn and Best Western have similar requirements: between 1 space per 65% and I space per 80% of rooms. Certainly their requirement would be based on a thorough knowledge of the business and what is necessary to avoid problems. The East Valley Highway Hotel can operate at 90% capacity, with two spaces utilized by employees, and probably still not need the 8 off-site spaces. It would be extremely rare for the East Valley Highway Hotel to be full and almost inconceivable that Nendels would be full at the same time. Given the circumstances: that we were notified of these additional requirements with regards to this easement only after 7 months of correspondence; that this late notice creates an extreme hardship for us and jeopardizes our project in which we are heavily financially vested and which in all other respects has been found acceptable to the city of Renton; C:\My Documents\Renton Best Westem\Zimmerman 3-I2-99.doc Page 3 of 4 ' •e MC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAX:923-9763 that the parking requirements of the City of Renton are comparatively stringent; the parking needs of the project have been met with the on-site spaces considering a model of average occupancy based on historical data from hotels in the area as well as the opinion of national hotel franchise operations that are in the business of running profitable,problem-free establishments; that the effect of these additional requirements would be relatively minor in any event; we request a variance as to these final required easement provisions that would require a new document to be executed. We ask merely that you now accept the easement of record as fulfilling the requirement for a parking easement,as we truly believed it had already been accepted some months ago. At the last meeting Bill and Soo An and myself had with Mr. Rosen, I was left with the impression that he also felt such a variance was warranted, under the circumstances, and possible to arrange. He did initially take the request to his immediate supervisor with, I believe,his vote of support. Now I understand that you are the person who would have the authority to grant this request and am hopeful you will agree. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. I appreciate your assistance in advance. Ve / ly yours, 1Pester . •ct Administrator MC Construction CC: Bill and Soo An Peter Rosen C.\My DocumentslRenton Best WestemlZimmerman 3-I2-99.doc Page 4 of 4 Proposed Best Western - Renton Rental Comparison Summary Basic Double Single #of Single Double Corp. Estimated Amenities No. Name/location Rooms Age Rack Rate Rack Rate Rate Occupancy Comments I Comfort Inn Kent 101 1997 $80 $90 $67 61% _Newly constructed limited service facility 2 miles S. of subject. 22311 84th Ave S. Amenities incl. indoor pool&spa, exercise room, cont. brkfst. Kent Occupancy first 6 months of operations 61%, at $70.95 ADR. 2 Holiday Inn 122 1987 $109 $109 $89 75% Located 2 miles south of subject, adjacent to SR 167. 22218 84th Ave S. Amenities include outdoor pool,spa; Mitzels Restaurant Kent adjacent. Extensively upgraded and changed franchise 9/96. 3 Best Western Southcenter 146 1986 $88 $88 $69 60% ,Full service facility with restaurant, lounge, 6,000sf of 15901 W. Valley Rd. meeting space. Outdoor pool,spa. Good location near Tukwila Southcenter Mall. Previously had Nendel's franchise affiliation. 4 Hampton Inn Southcenter 154 1990 $70 $84 $70 70% High visibility location adjacent to I-405 near Southcenter 7200 S. 156th St. Mall. Mid-priced newer hotel with corporate orientation. Tukwila Similar rooms quality to subject; superior location. . 5 Homestead Village Southcenter 93 1997 $44 $47 $44 80% High visibility location adjacent to 1-405 near Southcenter 15635 West Valley Highway (Over 7 Days) Mall. Budget new extended stay hotel; full kitchens, Tukwila $74 $84 $74 weekly housekeeping, limited project amenities. (Under 7 Days) s,, Subject Proposed Best Western 90 1998 Located adjacent to SI,. 167,in commercial/industrial nbrhd 3600 Block E.Valley Rd. Proposed on east side of Kent Valley. Amenities will include indoor Renton pool,spa,exercise room. Good freeway visibility and access • Prepared by McKee&Schalka •ti • Apr111998 • • M m n. a . E a ki REN EON:- DF, Q1 1994 P.ocrr. Re‘.•en,w rn m Jan 1995 1996 1997 Feb48y, 49.30 S.`,156 29.1. 40.09 Feb4 Mar 48% 40.40 69,888 39% 39.90 51.73160 23% 47.50 53.621 62%% 41.02 194,d85 0 � � 3T.913 84.321 42% Si.750 30% 47.50 53,521 May55 37 3 84.7 40.04 68,105 40% 46.41 821% 45.22 94,320 45% 45% 44 18 77,979 �7,C,2 ' % 45.58 92,995 Jun 39.07 70,935 51% 43.65 38% 45.51 67,CW2 439b 40.5E c % 40.60 83,51190,'14 act 4'.32 72,922 554 53% 45.Jul Sd9L 443Ei 92,534 a � 96,037 T7'96 41.91 127,330 _649b 46,1E . 118,554 9 4 44 36 2 66/` 48.59 129,934 7215; 44.91 8% 48.59 132,178, w 60%41% 48.91 113.799897 8..% 48.'0 161,753 73% 51.42 152,283 768% 53.13 157,510 Q 377E 43.018 62% 42.86 105,060 53% 52.16 115.942 '5% 47. 2 10, Noy63,311 56 h 44.95 120,251 88 ©� 299E �,07 46.255 42% 43.00 73 736 57'X 47.67 111.165 3ti1 :` :18 t b9.76�5 - 4•3% 40.13 67208 4<J"J6 44.f$ 84 099 47% 44.95 1B3,959 u� 494:: 46;x! .. �' "' t53:�o. • 47°y; 45.83 83,959 .., AVG/TOYAL40% 41.83 $886150 4 . 109;4�A6 :4, jF"..?t '87 _. r 49.1`JL ' 43.60$1.034,715 SZO°�L 45.96$1,138,717 60.3X 45.08 S1,3Zg060 z Rolitg months to 2 Q E Q co 0 s co i I. m N ch N c , 1 a I.A.�V1 w _. A CITY v Ale RENTON ;AL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 22, 1998 Mr. Mike Cohen MC Construction 2142 Abernathy Road NE Olympia, WA 98506 SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel Project No. LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 21/01,- 29-E20'vv-' Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Bill and Soo An/Property Owners FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 9i3 -0L9 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 26, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Gregg Zimmerman G f SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel Peter, I agree with your analysis and recommendation regarding the Parking Code Modification Request. Please modify your memo into a letter for my signature, attach a copy of the original request letter, and send up for my signature. Thanks. cc: \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\Document2 CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM CONCURRENCE _ DACE /a3/9c\ NAME INITIAL/DATE DATE:: March 19, 1999 - ( y (1 /3//3 TO: Gregg Zimmerman 5 c ca `1 41-33),,<:;)FROM: Peter Roser0, : ��ej52- (7. /26 SUF3JECT: East Valley Highway Motel - LUA98-062, SA-A, ECF Parking Code Modification _ TI'e subject proposal received site plan approval on May 28, 1998. The parking issue was discussed thoroughly in the site plan report. The motel proposal was 8 parking spaces short of their required parking. The application included a copy of a cross-parking easement with the adjacent Nendels motel. The applicant was told and the report described the inadequacies of the existing cross-parking easement. First of all, the submitted easement did not provide an adequate legal description of the properties which benefit from the easement. The cross- parking easement would essentially allow for joint use parking between the sites, which would lot satisfy the parking requirements of the proposal. The code requires shared, joint use parking only when the uses have dissimilar peak hour demands which two motels obviously could not satisfy. The applicant was told 8 parking spaces would need to be provided as off- site parking and reserved on the Nendels site specifically for their proposed use. The site plan condition states: In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verify that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this information to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. After site plan approval, I received sporadic correspondence from the applicant and I explained what was necessary to satisfy the site plan condition. The applicant did provide a site plan of Nendels and a parking analysis to indicate there was sufficient parking available. The applicant also sent a draft easement which was again essentially a cross-parking agreement, not reserving the 8 spaces as required. With all their building permit submittals, I made the same comments regarding a need to revise their parking easement. It should also be noted that the required emergency access easement through the Nendels site was an entirely separate site plan condition, and the applicant was able to record this required easement. It is very unfortunate for the applicant that the owners sold Nendels without having revised the parking easement when they had ownership control. However, I object to any assertion that staff is somehow responsible for their oversight. Therefore, the applicant is now in a situation of needing a parking modification, if they are unable to modify the easement language. The following facts support their request: 1) There is sufficient parking on the Nendels Motel site for satisfying the parking requirements of Nenc els and also for the 8 spaces of off-site parking needed by the applicant. 2) Motel/hotel parking requirements are 1 space per room plus 2 parking spaces for each 3 emplo,ees. Assuming occupancy is less than 100%, (the applicant claims Nendel's occupancy is 60%), there should be adequate parking available for both uses during peak period s. 3) The applicant does have a legally recorded easement providing for cross-parking between the two sites. We recommend approval of the parking modification. The only concern we have is that if Nendels expands in the future, the need for additional parking could interfere with that parking purportedly for the East Valley Motel. This could be prevented if Nendels agrees to a covenant to set aside the parking; however, the intent of the requested modification is so the applicant would not require further easements or covenant agreements from the owners of Nendels. cc Jana Huerter CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 1999 TO: Jana Huerter Peter Rosen FROM: Gregg Zimmerman G a SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel Parking Variance Issue The attached letter presents an interesting issue. Although the applicant is asking for a variance, I'm not sure that is what he needs- it sounds more like he needs our easement language requirements relaxed. Anyway, Peter is more versed on this issue than I am. Please provide a written recommendation to me. I would assume this is fairly time sensitive. Thanks. cc: \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\Document3 MC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTAIN S P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAx:923-9763 • March 8, 1999 Gregg Zimmerman `:;;" Planning,Building and Public Works Administrator C..'L__I" -:7;_ ,f.`;!•b, City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: The East Valley Highway Motel Land Use Case No. LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF Building Permit No. B980374 Dear Mr.Zimmerman, It appears that the building permit for our project has been ready to release except for a land-use condition that has resurfaced. We have appreciated Mr. Rosen's help throughout this project but on this last issue he has recommended we contact you. In brief: our project, an 88-room hotel, is on a site that contains a portion of Panther Creek. In the development of the surrounding area, the creek has been relocated several times to end up in a man-made channel along the southern property line of this property. It is now protected by 25-foot buffers, which have posed significant challenges in designing our project on an already constrained in-fill site. We have managed to design a feasible project while protecting the creek and even providing for its enhancement. In so doing,we have asked for but one concession that we believed we had been granted:that we be permitted to use 8 parking spaces at the adjacent Nendels Inn to satisfy our 90 space minimum parking requirements. This idea came up early in designing the project as there was already a recorded cross-parking agreement between the past owner of Nendels and of the subject property. The agreement anticipated a bridge across the channel and allowed for the customers of one establishment to utilize vacant spaces at the other. Also, we realized that the best,perhaps only, method of providing emergency vehicle access and turnaround was to connect the properties by a bridge as contemplated by the agreement. A copy of this easement was submitted with the original application. When we received our land use action decision, it contained the following condition: "In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off- site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verb that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this to the satisfaction of Development Services Division,prior to the issuance of building permits." We addressed this condition shortly thereafter. I spoke with Peter Rosen by phone to discuss this and the other conditions of the land use decision. I submitted by fax on June 9, 1998 a revised easement that referenced and re-stated the terms of the original cross-parking agreement and added a provision to allow emergency vehicles access to both properties. I asked that this be approved in form and I would have it signed. At this time, Bill and Soo An, the owners of the proposed East Valley Highway Hotel, had just purchased Nendels. As the two properties were in common ownership, I could easily have any necessary easement executed. I then obtained and submitted a site plan of Nendels showing the number of parking spaces versus the number of rooms and employees,which demonstrated 12 additional spaces. At the same time I provided a property map of the area,to scale,showing the adjacent Nendels was obviously within 750 feet. I followed up with a short meeting on June 28th, 1998 with Peter Rosen to review the above submittals. I made notes Pa e1of4 C:\My DocumentsUtenton Best Westem\Zimmern�an 3-12-99.doc g iviC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAX:923-9763 that the site plan showing the availability of spaces at Nendels was approved as was the area map showing the 750-foot radius from the property. In my notes I also wrote that the"new easement [is] not necessary. Fire department has standard form for emergency access easement. Get signed for both properties." I went to the fire department but no one knew where the forms were. I left a request for one to be faxed to me, which it was. I retyped it as the fax copy was not very clear and the 1" side margins required by the auditor were questionable. I had this signed by Bill and Soo An as to both properties. They recorded the document and submitted a copy to the City. I received a call from Peter Rosen that the easement would have to be reviewed by the city's attorneys for form since I had retyped it and that this process could take some time. I asked to be let known if anything further was required. The next I heard of this issue was in October as I was franticly going from department to department to expedite the handling of the final few requirements holding up the release of the permit. With the sensitivity of the creek, the weather was threatening to postpone the project for 7 or 8 months. You are aware of the complexity of permitting a hotel, especially in an unfamiliar municipality, and can appreciate that I had my hands full trying to make sure I had the all-inclusive "short-list" of requirements from the various departments and was addressing each of those items. Even in my efforts to track down such straggler requirements, I did not come across the easement problem. This was literally the last item I found out about. Suddenly I would need to revise the easement to "identify 8 particular spaces at Nendels, reserve those specifically for the use of the East Valley Highway Hotel and stipulate that these may not be used by Nendels to satisfy parking requirements for any future expansion. I was not immediately concerned about the last minute resurfacing of the easement issue or that it was suddenly much more definitive and precise in the language and terms it was to contain. I was frustrated that it would be an additional delay, but frankly, I was starting to give up on the prospect of being able to start the project anyway—things had just taken to long up to this point and the weather was turning. But when I called the An's to make arrangements to draft yet another easement I learned they had sold Nendels! Predictably, the buyer recognized this as an opportunity to hold-up the An's and demand renegotiation,remuneration,etc. The entire idea of an easement is to eliminate the need of renegotiating an agreement with every new owner of a property,as they will always demand payment if they think they can. This is whether they are actually impacted adversely by the agreement or not. In this case, there is a valid easement against his property that allows customers of the East Valley Highway to park in his parking lot and vice versa. He still has 4 additional spaces in his lot, though there is no room for him to expand his facility anyway. There would be no real additional impact on him in signing a re-worded easement. Yet, he is not required to sign a new easement and knows the An's are well-vested in the process; therefore, it becomes an opportunity to demand money. This puts the An's in a difficult position after they have spent a year and better that$200,000 in permitting the project to date and still have final fees of another$150,000 to the City of Renton to look forward to. I must ask for your help in resolving this. We were aware that an easement was necessary from the beginning. We knew that we had to satisfy Development Services as to its form -this was stated in the land use decision. We produced the easements and must take issue with how the approval process was handled. We were not aware of the specifics that came out at the last moment. We did not know that approval of our original easement had been withheld. The numerous conversations about the deficiency of the original, recorded easement which we submitted with our initial application centered around emergency access and that it did not contain the language to fulfil that requirement. I drafted a new easement that combined the parking and emergency access requirements, and asked for comments. The response again focused on the emergency access portion and that I should use the fire department's accepted form. This led me to the conclusion that otherwise the easement was acceptable, that if I executed the fire departments form as a separate easement then the original parking agreement could stand as it was. I never attempted to revise the parking agreement portion of the easement itself as I never understood it to be in question. The requirement of the land use decision said that we must satisfy development Services as to the easement prior to building permits, but that does not absolve the Department of informing us if it is withholding such approval and for what C:\My Documents\Renton Best Westem\Zimmerman 3-12-99.doc Page 2 of 4 MC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTpul TS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAx:923-9763 reasons. I had many discussions over a considerable period of time in which any problems or objections could have and should have been raised. I knew that not only Peter Rosen but also others had reviewed the easement. We were given no notice and no reason to believe it had not been accepted until the very last minute when we could no longer easily address the matter. I don't doubt that this was an honest mistake on the staffs part. Indeed, I have found the entire staff most helpful and responsive throughout the process. Nevertheless,we find ourselves in a tough spot and are not convinced it is of our own doing. If I had been given specific provisions the easement was to contain at the onset, or at any time during the six months in which the An's were in ownership of Nendels, I could and would have easily provided one just as I did in the case of the emergency vehicle easement. If I had at the very least been told that, despite my efforts, I still had not gained approval on the easement I would have asked the additional questions to determine what I must do. I did what I thought was required by and acceptable to the City based on the description of the easement in the conditions of the land use decision ("a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property" — the original easement matches that description)and based on what I was told. In multiple discussions and correspondence on the issue I never was alerted to the fact that I needed to identify particular spaces or reserve them exclusively for the East Valley Highway Hotel or I would have done so. I addressed every requirement that was communicated to me. Fortunately, I think this can be fairly easily remedied. We understand that the City has its rules and requirements, which are the staffs responsibility to follow. But I also know that specific sets of circumstances can recommend a variance to them if the underlying intent of the rule and public welfare concerns are met. I believe that we have addressed all public safety and welfare concerns: there is an easement for emergency vehicles (the primary concern); there is a valid easement allowing for the customers of the East Valley Highway Hotel to park in the adjacent parking lot should the need arise. In my opinion, that the easement does not specifically identify the 8 spaces and reserve them for the sole use of the East Valley Highway Hotel is certainly of far lesser,if any,consequence. From the standpoint of having adequate parking for guests,there is justification for leniency. The 8 spaces in question would rarely, if ever,be needed. The hotels in the area have not historically pushed capacity. I have enclosed an excerpt from a recent appraisal of our project that estimates the average occupancy of several comparable hotels. Perhaps the best comparable project is the adjacent Nendels Inn. During the period in which the An's owned the Inn the occupancy rate was less than 60%. The attached revenue report from Nendels covering the years of 1994 through 1997 indicates that this has been the norm. The parking space requirements of the City of Renton are based on 100%occupancy plus additional spaces for personnel. Several municipalities with which we are familiar have parking requirements with formulas based more on those average occupancy rates, like one space per 80% of the rooms. Franchises such as Comfort Inn and Best Western have similar requirements: between 1 space per 65% and I space per 80% of rooms. Certainly their requirement would be based on a thorough knowledge of the business and what is necessary to avoid problems. The East Valley Highway Hotel can operate at 90% capacity, with two spaces utilized by employees, and probably still not need the 8 off-site spaces. It would be extremely rare for the East Valley Highway Hotel to be full and almost inconceivable that Nendels would be full at the same time. Given the circumstances: that we were notified of these additional requirements with regards to this easement only after 7 months of correspondence; that this late notice creates an extreme hardship for us and jeopardizes our project in which we are heavily financially vested and which in all other respects has been found acceptable to the city of Renton; C:\My Documents\Renton Best Western\Zimmerman 3-12-99.doc Page 3 of 4 1VIC CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O.Box 8478,OLYMPIA,WA 98506-8478• (360)456-6307• FAX:923-9763 - that the parking requirements of the City of Renton are comparatively stringent;the parking needs of the project have been met with the on-site spaces considering a model of average occupancy based on historical data from hotels in the area as well as the opinion of national hotel franchise operations that are in the business of running profitable,problem-free establishments; - that the effect of these additional requirements would be relatively minor in any event; we request a variance as to these final required easement provisions that would require a new document to be executed. We ask merely that you now accept the easement of record as fulfilling the requirement for a parking easement,as we truly believed it had already been accepted some months ago. At the last meeting Bill and Soo An and myself had with Mr. Rosen, I was left with the impression that he also felt such a variance was warranted, under the circumstances, and possible to arrange. He did initially take the request to his immediate supervisor with, I believe,his vote of support. Now I understand that you are the person who would have the authority to grant this request and am hopeful you will agree. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. I appreciate your assistance in advance. Ve I ly yours, ester Pr. •ct Administrator MC Construction CC: Bill and Soo An Peter Rosen C:\My Documents\Renton Best Westem\Zimmerman 3-I2-99.doc Page 4 of 4 Proposed Best Western - Renton Rental Comparison Summary Basic Double Single #of Single Double Corp. Estimated Amenities No. Name/location Rooms Age Rack Rate Rack Rate Rate Occupancy Comments I Comfort Inn Kent 101 1997 $80 $90 $67 61% .Newly constructed limited service facility 2 miles S. of subject. 22311 84th Ave S. Amenities incl. indoor pool&spa,exercise room, cont. brkfst. Kent Occupancy first 6 months of operations 61%, at$70.95 ADR. 2 Holiday Inn 122 1987 $109 $109 $89 75% Located 2 miles south of subject, adjacent to SR 167. 22218 84th Ave S. Amenities include outdoor pool, spa; Mitzels Restaurant Kent adjacent. Extensively upgraded and changed franchise 9/96. 3 Best Western Southcenter 146 1986 $88 $88 $69 60% ,Full service facility with restaurant, lounge,6,000sf of 15901 W. Valley Rd. meeting space. Outdoor pool,spa. Good location near Tukwila Southcenter Mall. Previously had Nendel's franchise affiliation. 4 Hampton Inn Southcenter 154 1990 $70 $84 $70 70% High visibility location adjacent to I-405 near Southcenter 7200 S. 156th St. Mall. Mid-priced newer hotel with corporate orientation. Tukwila Similar rooms quality to subject;superior location. , 5 Homestead Village Southcenter 93 1997 $44 $47 $44 80% High visibility location adjacent to I-405 near Southcenter 15635 West Valley Highway (Over 7 Days) Mall. Budget new extended stay hotel; full kitchens, Tukwila $74 $84 $74 weekly housekeeping, limited project amenities. (Under 7 Days) Subject Proposed Best Western 90 1998 Located adjacent to SR 167, in commerciaUindustrial nbrhd 3600 Block E. Valley Rd. Proposed on east side of Kent Valley. Amenities will include indoor Renton pool,spa,exercise room. Good freeway visibility and access. Prepared by McKee&Schalka April 1998 r; ! . ,� ea -....Yarn• .y . �. _ . r � _ il Poi. ° w-- _: _ _ _. r"! .._s p' M, • • a a a i REN TON: NENDELS 1NN Roca-Retren;je N rn .. t994 1995 1996 1997 o Jaa 34% 40.30 55,166 29% 40.09 47,831 23% 47.39 13.68E 62% 41.0E 102,495 Feb 48% 40.40 69,888 39% 39.90 51.750 30% 47.50 53,621 82% 42.22 94,580 6 Oar 55% 37.93 84.321 42% 40.04 68,105 40% 46.41 76,070 5'% 45.22 92,320 A API 48% 39.89 74,796 45% 44 18 '7,979 38% 45.51 67,042 4396 48.56 90,995 0.Y 45% 39.07 70,935 51% 43.65 90,'14 4L% 4-.32 72,922 64% 46,15 . 118,554 Jun 53% 40.60 83,511 53% 45.99 96,037 77% 41.91 127,330 74% 45.72 132,178, Jul 54% 44.36 92,634 85% 48.59 129,9340 Aug 60% 48.9t t 1 J.793 a � 72% t4.91 130,908 68 h 48.59 133,584 ILI Sep 415E 46.9t 7Z8937 8..94 48.'0 151,753 73% 51.42 152,283 78% 50.13 157,310 r� Oct 62% 42.86 105,060 53% 52.18 115.942 65% 47.52 120,251 Q• 37% 43.01 63,311 42% 43.00 73 738 57% 47.67 111,165 56% 44.95 100,688 Nov 299E 42.07 48,255 43% 40.13 67298 49% 44.C8 84,099 .47% 45.83 63,959 Dec 4 'i$:,--69;764 'f t4 . 48 7l: : .., 114f �' `.: -53%. •gJ,x;S`'. 1{?3; 46:.. <-4i / . .i %- -, AVG1rOTAL45,0 41.63 $886,150 49.1%,., 43.60 61.034,715 52.0% 45.96$1,138,717 60.3%' 46.08$1,320,080 Roing 12 months 0 z 1w i Q. E Q 0 0 tD 1 m _r N os h- 1 N U ` � W G CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has decided to reconsider the traffic mitigation fee for the subject proposal as requested by the applicant. The Environmental Review Committee concurs with the staff recommendation to reduce the traffic mitigation fee from $45,936 to $41,505.75. The applicant's request to further lower the traffic mitigation fee is denied. DATE OF DECISION: June 23, 1998 SIGNATURES: 74. -- "vim gg immerman, Ad inistrator DATE epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works • o/z3/9) m astain, Administrator DATE Community Services g01 ` Lee Wheel , Fi e C ief DAT Renton Fi Department DNSMREC.DOC • CITPC.. RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 16, 1998 Steve Yester MC Construction Consultants 2142 Abernathy Road NE Olympia,WA 98516 Subject: Traffic Mitigation Fee Calculation East Valley Highway Hotel,LUA-98-062 Dear Mr. Yester: We have reviewed your request to reduce the traffic mitigation fee for the East Valley Highway Hotel project based upon traffic counts at a nearby hotel. We are unable to fully approve your request for reducing this mitigation fee, but have recalculated the fee based upon a fitted curve equation which results in a partial reduction of the fee. For uses which are evaluated for trip generation values in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, it is our policy to use the published trip generation values rather than substitute lower (or higher) values based upon small scale traffic studies of similar facilities. Hotels are listed in the ITE Trip Generation Manual as Land Use 310. Trip generation values, based upon seven separate studies, are given for average daily trips based upon occupied rooms. The average rate listed is 8.70 trips per room, with a range from 5.31 trips to 9.58 trips. Our original calculation used the average value of 8.70 trips. The manual also provides a fitted curve equation for calculating the average daily trip generation. The formula is as follows: T= 8.802 (X) -59.208 where X is the number of occupied rooms and T is the average daily trips. Using this formula results in a reduced trip generation value. For hotels it has been our policy to calculate the traffic mitigation fee based upon an assumption of 80% occupancy. A recent study prepared for an ESA hotel in Renton listed average occupancy rates of 89%. We believe that the value of 80%the appropriate value for these calculations. The report prepared to justify your request for a reduction in the traffic mitigation fee concluded that the average daily trip generation per occupied room is 3.85 daily trips. This value seems unreasonably low. The minimum values provided in the range by ITE is 5.31 daily trips. The value of 3.85 trips means that on average there would be less than two round trips per occupied room. This does not seem realistic for the room occupant alone, with trips for shopping, visits, meals, business, etc. There would also be additional trips associated with hotel employees, service vehicles, visitors, and business contacts. The values provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual seem more realistic for this type of use. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer „ - CI _ _ XPdr RENTON sia, A a\ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator In summary, your request for substituting revised trip generation values from a limited study for the values listed in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for this use is denied. Similarly, your request to revise the assumption for occupancy rate is also denied. The traffic mitigation fee calculation has been revised based upon the fitted curve equation provide by ITE in place of the use of the average daily trip rate. This revised calculation reduces the fee from $45,936 to$41,505.75. If you have further questions regarding this project, please contact Clint Morgan at(425)-430-7216. Sincerely, 1Je4 iitti7/L6 Neil Watts, P.E. Plan Review Supervisor Development Services Division cc: Peter Rosen Clint Morgan H:///planrev/evh-tbz l EVH-TRZ1 DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 Ica►_.._ ._•__ __._-._, ��o, �- .,.—e,. • MC Construction Consultants 2142 Abernathy Rd. NE Olympia, WA 98516 (360) 456-6307 Fax 923-9763 June 12, 1998 / C 'r0 PETER. �05E� Mr. Clinton Morgan ��Op{�11E REN��tj� City of Renton,Development Services D �OF 200 Mill Ave S. 1999 Renton,WA 98055 MA RE: EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL,Traffic Mitigation Fee geGE1\15Y Dear Mr.Morgan: G11✓✓ As I had informed Peter Rosen after I received the Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated) for this project, the only item of real concern was the Traffic Mitigation Fee as calculated therein. The owners of this project own several other motels and immediately reacted to the estimated number of average daily trips. They felt that, based on the whole of their experience, the anticipated number of trips had been significantly over-exaggerated. To test their suspicions, we commissioned a traffic count at a comparable facility,Nendel's Motel. Nendel's Motel is located immediately adjacent to the proposed East Valley Highway Hotel in Renton, WA. Nendel's is a larger facility than the proposed Hotel having 130 guest suites as opposed to 87, but in other respects is equivalent to this project. Trafficount performed a traffic study for both driveways of Nendel's hotel for a period of 72 hours from 3:00 PM on June 8, 1998 through 3:00 PM on June 11, 1998. The corresponding occupancy data for that same time period has been obtained from the owners of Nendel's. The average occupancy rate for these three days was within 1%of the historical annual average,which is 59.6%. That information is summarized in the table below. The total number of one-way trips (as opposed to round trips which would be half of the number shown) for each 24-hour period from 3:00 PM to 3:00 PM has been divided by the total rooms occupied for that night to arrive at a trips-per-room-per-day average. F > �� DAY1"- bAY 2 bAY3 300 FjM 8J9 to 3't70 PA4 6110 a ...•; .300 PM 6/10 3 Ob 6l11 . :� Total Trips (In and Out): 296 298 277 Rooms Occupied: 71 79 76 Average Trips/Room: •• • AVERAGE TRIPS PER ROOM PER DAY OVER 3-DAY PERIOD: r • Upon the conclusion of the study,we asked Jeff Schram of Transpo to review the traffic count data and our findings based on that data. He agreed that our methodology and findings appeared perfectly valid. Sixty-percent average occupancy is typical of a motel such as the East Valley Highway Motel and is what the owners are using in their financial projections. This assumption is validated by the occupancy averages reported by Nendel's and the other motels owned and operated by the owner's of this project. Sixty- percent occupancy of this 87-room motel would be 52.2. Based on this data,we request a reconsideration of the Traffic Mitigation Fee. We propose to pay the City of Renton what we believe is a fair Traffic Mitigation Fee based on the averages of 52.2 rooms occupied rooms times 3.85 trips per day,per room times the$75.00 per trip fee,which equates to$15,072.75. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at(360) 456-6307. o -7 - 0 C° .) Sincerely,e ---- 0 i Est)0 e Ter MC Construction CC: Peter Rosen RECEIVED Ink � Washington State Northwest Region J U N - 9 1998 V. Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 CITY OF RENTON Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DATE: June 8, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR-167 MP 25.00 CS 1765 East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A A . R, FROM /.'obert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, our response is checked below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State requests that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the impact of the project's generated peak hour trips on State Highways and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. The State also requests that a Hydraulics Report be provided to ascertain the hydraulic impact on the State Highway System. If you have any questions,please contact John Sutherland, (206)440-4914, or Don Hurter, (206)440-4664 of my Developer Services section. JBS:js I strspns.doc .... ... CITY' F RENTQN CURRENT PLANNING D AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the (-Z day of Wuxi , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Reps awAd Dec-stc v documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Mike. Govnevt VA( Cord Alc.-.trv,, Ball Ulna Soo Av\ (Signature of Sender) Saw w- .• Ser.rr- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that � ir1,hu2, pr" Spy o signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fore uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 19(A-ii1.P j S Notary Public and fo a State of W gton Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment expietimpAissioN442AF.54426199 Project Name: tAt_oti VVIcstel Project Number: L.0 A, qta • O(o2, - p ,EL NOTARY.DOC I REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: May 26, 1998 Project Name: East Valley Highway Motel Applic&&nt: MC Construction Owner. Bill and Soo An File Nu+nber:: LUA-098-062, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. Project Location: 3650 East Valley Highway Exist. adg. Area SF: Undeveloped Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 46,937 sq. ft. Site Area: 76,022 sq. ft. Total Building Area SF: 46,937 sq. ft. m ,.JI II ° ,A. a +'`....^ •EAST Ve LLEY HWY I1I. 2 11; J Y fa•rcn Q MOTEL x I, — j I r ,,`M'I'•Lx J" rJaM„•f,� 31.50 E.YAIILY IM/ • _ RUM.,MI TTOTS R-S _n%1e, 3115R St, , '''� !r0•k F.I IVS .. a_ l; -- " d JJJ fp ► 3fi.. .a0 :>Lc "'`smO,'oq<r,f; 3` R.8 f E Pa' cs _ U R L I N G T O N CA di.; 'S 36TH :7 =m ©;© .. MOfrdN .g' ,, L is ;''IFO O_ N 0 R T H E R N Ha... ,, iqi 1 I £ .— — CA P-1 L , I M '8'I•E.,.,, y . CA /. ( ( "` aixOixG °ATE °LaN t.� v i • s 5.,.,a y ©' , % VALLE MED 1 CA lal_n „__ __ a 1' �I C C•E � 6R If.vafT E 5 `a. 4 ; � q N �.. L...xf.;r. �f LeGIND f—r O roxlf p p SYNC,f'wa' Project Local on Map SITERC.DOC City of Rentc n P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Err nenta!Review Committee Staff Report • EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF HAY 26, 1998 Page 2 of15 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Th3 applicant seeks Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review to construct a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. Th a motel would include office facilities, an indoor pool and recreation area, and conference room. Pr'mary access to the site is via a driveway off East Valley Highway. The applicant proposes an emergency access exiting the southeast corner of the site to adjacent property on the so Jth, developed as the Nendels Motel. The emergency access would connect to Nendel's dri veway. The emergency access drive would require a bridge over Panther Creek. TI-e proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on the adjoining Nendels Motel property per a cross parking agreement. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The pr nposal maintains a minimum 25 foot setback from the creek. The applicant is proposing to er hance the buffer on the north side of the creek with native plantings. !FART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only these project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1 Earth Impacts: The site is fairly level, with a gradual slope to the north. The steepest slopes on the site are confined to the stream banks which are approximately 40%. Vegetation on the site is mostly low grasses, with reed cannarygrass along the streambank. The geotechnical study was prepared by Bradley-Noble Geotechnical Services. The study identified a fill section varying in thickness from six to ten feet on the site, underlaid by native soils which are organic silt and peats in the upper level, becoming more sandy with depth. The native soils become more dense with depth, even at a depth there are layers of peat and fine organics. The geotechnical report does not recommend use of the existing fill to support foundations. For support of the motel, the report recommends use of driven wood piles. Geotextile support fabric is recommended to underlay paved areas. The grading plan indicates 1,300 cubic yards of cut and 3,000 cubic yards of fill would be required to develop the site. The site would be stripped of existing vegetation and graded for asphalt and building areas. Erosion could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TOSCO) and a Construction Mitigation Plan and prior to issuance of Construction Permits. SITERC.D DC City of Rento l P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Eni nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLi FY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF MAY 26, 1998 Page 3 of 15 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TOSCO and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Overall air impacts would be relatively minor in nature and not considered significant to warrant special mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts Panther Creek was relocated onto the subject property during development of surrounding properties and now runs along the south part of the property in a man- made channel. There are no wetlands associated with the channelized creek. According to the East Side Green River Watershed Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (December 1996), there are few fish expected to be present in Panther Creek, both due to habitat problems and upstream and downstream migration blockages. During flooding conditions, Panther Creek flows can exceed the downstream capacity of a 3,000-foot-long pipe system along East Valley Road/SW 34th street. As a result, the project site and surrounding properties are subject to flooding and localized drainage problems. The City has plans to reroute the major flows from Panther Creek to the north (via the wetlands east of SR 167). However, plans have been delayed due to concerns expressed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Therefore, the flooding problem in the vicinity of the site is expected to continue and staff recommends measures to mitigate potential impacts both to the subject proposal and to prevent impacts that could affect surrounding properties. The proposal would not directly impact the creek. A minimum 25 foot building setback is maintained from the bank of the creek. The proposal would bridge the creek in the southeast corner of the site to provide a secondary, emergency road access through the adjacent Nendels Motel site. The culvert must be sized to convey 100-year flood flows. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The crossing will require a Hydraulic Approval Permit (HPA) from the Washington State Department of Fisheries. The proposal includes an oversized, underground concrete detention/treatment vault located under the access drive. The vault is sized to provide water quality treatment as well as required stormwater detention. Stormwater would be piped from the detention vault to the Panther Creek. The stormwater facilities will be required to meet the SITERC.DCC City of Rento 7 P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ern nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLL:Y HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF A AY 26, 1998 Page 4 of 15 standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRW) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. 5. The culvert for bridging Panther Creek shall be sized to convey flows from 100-year floods. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The applicant shall provide further details about the sizing of the culvert, subject to the approval of the Renton Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus Environmental Ordinance 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. SITERC.DCC City of Rento P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Eni nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLI"Y HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF h AY 26, 1998 Page 5 of 15 5) Transportation Impacts Primary access to the site would be via a 25 foot wide driveway off East Valley Highway. The applicant proposes a secondary, emergency access exiting the southeast corner of the site to adjacent property on the south, developed as the Nendels Motel. The emergency access would connect to Nendels driveway. The emergency access drive would require a bridge over Panther Creek. The emergency access drive is 25 feet wide. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. Trip generation numbers are estimated from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The proposal is estimated to generate 612.48 new average daily trips. Therefore, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x $75 = $45,936.00). Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x $75 = $45,936.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A eal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. SITERC.DOC City of Rento,i P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&En\ nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF It AY 26, 1998 Page 6 of 15 C. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRW) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100- year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. 5. The culvert for bridging Panther Creek shall be sized to convey flows from 100-year floods. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The applicant shall provide further details about the sizing of the culvert, subject to the approval of the Renton Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7 The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x $75 = $45,936.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. SITERC.DoC City of Rento 7 P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Eni nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF A lAY 26, 1998 Page 7 of 15 Advisory A otes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determinai ion. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process fo r environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additic nal hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Sepal 3te plans and permits for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. 2. One-hour construction, no sprinkler substitution, one-hour occupancy separation A3/R1 & B/R1, elevator lobbies one hour. PLAN RE\'IEW STORM D RAINAGE: 1. The SI orm System Development Connection charge is $5,727.72. 2. The Storm Detention /Treatment Vault plan must to be submitted for structural and access approval. Access openir g to be 36-inches. 3. Provide vertical profile. 4. Core requirements and Special requirements are to be addressed as listed in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. City o' Renton Drafting Standards to be followed. 6. Panth Creek is a stream that the Corps has commented is within their jurisdiction and any work impacting the stream would require a Section 404 permit. SEWER (Naste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,929.71. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. A veil ical profiles of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Side :ewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A seen er backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-ft. Propc sed floor elevation as shown is 21.4-feet. 6. Vertical profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. WATER: 1. If req aired fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be in a 15-ft. Utility easement. The required fireflow per Fire Prevention is 3500 gpm. 2. One 1 ire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Therefore, four (4) fire hydrants will be required. 3. The Ilimary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. A 10.inch loop water line is needed to get the fire flow above the required 3500 gpm. A 10-inch loop will provide 4000 gpm of fire flow. 5. Them will be a System Development Connection charge is $8,590.48. 6. Drav,ings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Verti gal profile will be required showing the water system.. 8. A Double Detector Check Valve Assembly for the fire flow to be located at the back of sidewalk in a vault. TRANSPORTATION: 1. A brief traffic distribution report to be provided. 2. Provide a recorded copy of joint access agreement between two motel properties. SITERC.DJC City of Rental P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ent nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF h AY 26, 1998 Page 8 of 15 AIRPORT The proposed site is located slightly west of the airport's extended centerline. The impact of aircraft operations is considered ninor, however, the aircraft operations should be acknowledged by the project applicants. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decis on on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determinat ion. A. Type of Land Use Action :< Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits Tl e following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan/Landscape Plan, (Received April 17, 1998). E<hibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Preliminary Grading and Storm Drainage Plan (Received April 17, 1998). E<hibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Preliminary Utility Service Plan (Received April 17, 1998). E<hibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan (Received April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Exterior Elevations (Received April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, First Level Floor Plan (Received April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, Second Level Floor Plan (Received April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Third Level Floor Plan (Received April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 10: Drawing No. 9, Neighborhood Detail Map (April 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 11: Drawing No. 10, Disturbed Buffer Revegetation Plan (April 17, 1998). SITERC.DDC City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval& Env _ nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF h AY 26, 1998 Page 9 of 15 C. Co isistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(p) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Ra'iewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES; The site is designated Employment Area-Valley (EAV) in the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. The proposed motel use falls within the range of uses indicated for the designation. New development should be located designed, to achieve compatibility with adjacent uses. The subject site is surrounded by existing commercial uses. The proposal is consistent with the following applicable EAV policies: Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. The following policies are intended to guide development in the EAV designation. Policy LU-212.6 Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: a. shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; b. an improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and c. an opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. (Community Design policies) The site plan incorporates a number of elements which are consistent with the EAV Comprehensive Plan policies listed above. The site plan includes street trees, and shared parking with the adjacent property allows more intensive utilization of the site. E . CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Motels are allowed as a primary r ermitted use in the CA zone. Setbacks - The CA zone requires a front/street setback of a minimum of 10 feet. This setback abutting public streets must be landscaped. The proposed site plan complies with this provision. The landscape strip is planted as a grass area with street trees except for the stream buffer area which would not be cleared of existing vegetation or would be planted with native plant species where disturbed. There is no side or rear yard setback requirement in the CA zone. SITERC.D DC City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ely nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF h AY 26, 1998 Page 10 of l5 Height - The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The peak of the roof of the pro Dosed motel is 39.5 feet and facades on the side elevations reach 44 feet, complying with the height limits of the CA zone. Lot Coverage - The CA zone allows up to 65% lot coverage for buildings. The building foc tprint of 16,082 square feet equals a lot coverage of approximately 21%. Landscaping - The Parking Code requires a minimum of 5% of a large parking area (over 10.000 square feet) to be provided as interior parking lot landscaping. It appears that the prcposal accomplishes this standard. The applicant should verify compliance with this prc vision. The subject site is within the Green River Valley Planning area. An environmental mitigation ag*eement between the City and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) requires that 2% of a sib; area be provided as a natural landscape area for wildlife habitat. The applicant is proposing enhancement of the stream buffer on the north side of Panther Creek with native plantings. This would comply with the code requirement. Tr e code requires a pedestrian connection between the public entrance and the street. There is a sidewalk provided along the entire north side of the building which would only need a mi-ior extension to connect to the sidewalk. The site plan should be revised to provide a pE destrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. Parking - The Parking Code requires 1 parking space for each room plus 2 parking spaces for each 3 employees. The proposed motel has 88 guest rooms and 4 to 6 employees according to the environmental checklist. Therefore, 90 parking spaces are required to meet the code. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on the adjoining N ;ndels Motel property. Because both of the properties are motel uses, the parking agreement would not qualify for shared, joint use parking. Off-site parking is permitted by the code. The applicant must first demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the intended use. The applicant included a parking easement/agreement recorded in 1989 which would allow for parking on the adjacent site. However, the copy of the easement does n)t include a description of the properties which benefit from the agreement. The applicant should provide further information to clarify that there is a recorded agreement for the off-site p irking. Environmentally Sensitive Areas - Panther Creek runs along the south part of the property in a n an-made channel. It was relocated onto the site when surrounding properties were developed. The proposal would not directly impact the creek. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance requires a 25 foot buffer from the high water mark of creeks. No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within the buffer area except enhancement activities. The proposal maintains a minimum 25 foot setback from the creek t ank. The applicant is proposing to enhance the buffer on the north side of the creek with r ative plantings. A revegetation/enhancement plan has been prepared by The Coot Company, wetland and wildlife consultants. The existing creek channel and buffer is comprised of a nearly monotypic community of reed cannarygrass. The outer ten feet of the 25 foot stream buffer would be cleared for site preparation. Following grading, the disturbed buffer area would be replanted with native shrubs. The enhancement with native shrubs would provide forage and nesting for some avian species and provide some shading and detritus source to the stream channel. The proposal bridges the creek in the southeast corner of the site to provide a secondary, emergency road access through the adjacent Nendels Motel site. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance allows for the "installation of essential roads and utilities where no feasible SITERC.DOC City of Rento 1 P/B/PW Departmen Administrative Site Plan Approval& Eny__ _ nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEYHIGHWAYMOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF A AY 26, 1998 Page I I of 15 altE rnative exists." The subject site is constrained by the creek and the proposed location of the secondary access is the only feasible alternative for providing the required emergency acc ess. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; Th; proposed motel is in a commercial zone and is surrounded by properties developed with commercial uses. Because the immediate area is already intensively developed with commercial uses and the site has direct access to a major arterial, the motel is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts to surrounding properties or uses. There is an existing motel located adjacent to the south, a self-storage use to the north, and a Home Base and Act III Cinemas across the East Valley Highway west of the site. The construction and operation of the proposed motel is not expected to impair the use or enjoyment of surrounding properties. Tha site plan indicates landscape plantings along the north property boundary which would as;ist in screening the parking area. The proposed planting is not continuous along the property line. The applicant should revise the site plan to provide a continuous planting of sh-ubs along the north property boundary to screen the parking area. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; Tf•e proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. The site plan maintains a minimum 2f. foot buffer width from the creek and the applicant proposes to enhance the buffer with nz tive plants. The length of the building is oriented so guest rooms will have views toward the cr?ek, taking advantage of the creek as a site amenity. The subject site is narrow and the building is oriented along an east/west axis. The orientation of the building would reduce the bulk and scale as viewed from the street and surrounding properties. It would avoid an appearance of an overconcentration of structures on the site. C instruction activities related to the proposed development would be required to utilize best management practices which would reduce potential construction impacts on the site. R aquired utility improvements, including the stormwater drainage system, would be designed tc mitigate the potential impacts of the proposed development on the site. Therefore, the construction of the development is not anticipated to adversely impact the subject site. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The subject proposal would develop a vacant commercial property that is very constrained due to the alignment of the creek across the site. Development of the site is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; F rimary access to the site is via one driveway off East Valley Highway. The applicant proposes an emergency access exiting the southeast corner of the site to adjacent property on the south, developed as the Nendels Motel. The emergency access would connect to Nendels c riveway and exit from the existing driveway on the Nendels site to the East Valley Highway. l he applicant should provide a copy of a recorded easement allowing use of the Nendels Motel site for the purpose of a secondary, emergency access. The on-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation is designed to be safe and efficient. Transportation staff has not identified adverse impacts to the local road system. Staff is recommending a condition of approval to require the applicant to provide a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. There is a SITERC.DoC City of Rento 7 P/B/PW Departmeni Administrative Site Plan Approval&Env nental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF t AY 26, 1998 Page 12 of 15 sidewalk provided along the entire north side of the building which almost connects to the sidewalk. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building is sufficiently setback from property boundaries and existing buildings to ,allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Th a proposed development is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Ncise, dust, and odors which may result with construction of the project would be mitigated thrDugh measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management pn ictices. The building is oriented east/west on the site which minimizes exposure to both Highway 167 and East Valley Highway. This would reduce potential noise impacts from traffic on motel g�ests. I. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads. The applicant will be responsible fo- extension of utilities on-site to serve the proposed building. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. T le proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving a vacant site in an active commercial area. It would provide for more continuous commercial development which may assist the neighborhood. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. F indings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the East Valley Highway Motel. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City SITERC.DOC City of Rentc i P/B/PW Departmer Administrative Site Plan Approval&En..._...mental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLI'Y HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF P IAY 26, 1998 Page 13 of 15 departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents wa s entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the rec uirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drz wings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 11. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Cc mprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area Valley (EAV). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Self- storage use; East: SR 167; South: Nendels Motel; and West: Home Base, Act III Cinemas. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial (CA). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. SITERC.DOC City of Rento 1 P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Env rental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF A'AY 26, 1998 Page 14 of 15 F. De vision Tho Site Plan for the East Valley Highway Motel, File No. LUA-98-066, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a calculation verifying that a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verify that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this information to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan/landscape plan to provide a continuous planting of shrubs along the north property boundary to screen the parking area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a recorded easement allowing use of the Nendels Motel site for the purpose of a secondary, emergency access. The easement shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division and recorded, prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECT VE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNAT JRES: James C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 27th day of May, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Mike Cohen and Steve Yester MC Construction 2142 Abernathy Road NE Olympia, WA. 98506 Bill and Soo An 3122 Leeward Court NW Olympia, WA. 98502 SITERC.DOC City of Rento 1 P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Env 7ental Review Committee Staff Report EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF Il"AY 26, 1998 Page 15 of 15 TRANSMITTED 27th day of May, 1998 to the following: Larry Mecklir g, Building Official Art Larson, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, F ublic Works Division Lawrence J. Narren, City Attorney South Count/Journal Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determinal ion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. Any aggrie'fed person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneo is procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Enviror mental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will b; no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Su)ervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environrnental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $T5.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. SITERC.DOC CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 28th day of W�s�� , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope contain) g EIRc EC'evw i *tans documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wasteln ater Treatment Division Larry Fish(r Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamist Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jaing a Puget Sound Energy (Signatt.re of Sender) Esw1n K., Stec.[ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNT' OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that4-92»i6 e_e � signed this instrumE nt and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tt uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: c�, /9,e ������P 944,1,fi- Notary Public` and for the State of WasfSifi'gton Notary (Pri4)-:7� .i I .,. p . ii€FF My appointment expire . COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: last kixit'e-t t4tAiu rot -t Project Number: LUA• q8 0(42. . SW - EL NOTARY.[OC CITX OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 28, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 9 3504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 26, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL/LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A Propos for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. Location: 3650 East Valley -lighway. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. Any agc rieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on error eous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal Nithin the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Super risor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of th a environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P A June 15, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing toge her with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. If you have qt.estions, please call me at (425) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Mana jer cc: King county Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duw ,mish Tribal Office Rod 'Jlalcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe .ainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNC YT TR DO 1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 --- CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- 1 site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley 11 Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther 1, Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRW) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel IV from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. 5. The culvert for bridging Panther Creek shall be sized to convey flows from 100-year floods. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The applicant shall provide further details about the sizing of the culvert, subject to the approval of the Renton Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. East Vz'Iley Highway Motel LUA-9E-062,SA-A,ECF Mitigation Measures & Conditions (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Mitiga:ion Measures (Continued) 7. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x $75 = $45,936.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The rite Plan for the East Valley Highway Motel, File No. LUA-98-066, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a calculation verifying that a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verify that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this information to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan/landscape plan to provide a continuous planting of shrubs along the north property boundary to screen the parking area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a recorded easement allowing use of the Nendels Motel site for the purpose of a secondary, emergency access. The easement shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division and recorded, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. 2. One-hour construction, no sprinkler substitution, one-hour occupancy separation A3/R1 & B/R1, elevator lobbies one hour. PLAN REVIEW STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $5,727.72. 2. The Storm Detention /Treatment Vault plan must to be submitted for structural and access approval. Access opening to be 36-inches. 3. Provide vertical profile. 4. Core requirements and Special requirements are to be addressed as listed in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. City of Renton Drafting Standards to be followed. 6. Panther Creek is a stream that the Corps has commented is within their jurisdiction and any work impacting the stream would require a Section 404 permit. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,929.71. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. A vertical profiles of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. East Valley Highway Motel LUA-98-(162,EC F,SA-A Advisory Notes (Continued) 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-fL. Proposed floor elevation as shown is 21.4-feet. 6. Vert cal profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Dra\iings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. WATER: 1. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be i i a 15-ft. Utility easement. The required fireflow per Fire Prevention is 3500 gpm. 2. On( fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Therefore, four(4) fire hydrants will be required. 3. ThE primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The sec)ndary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. A 1 )-inch loop water line is needed to get the fire flow above the required 3500 gpm. A 10-inch loop will provide 4000 gpm of fire flow. 5. Th( re will be a System Development Connection charge is $8,590.48. 6. DrE wings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Ve tical profile will be required showing the water system.. 8. A Double Detector Check Valve Assembly for the fire flow to be located at the back of sidewalk in a va'ilt. TRAN:;PORTATION: 1. A brief traffic distribution report to be provided. 2. Provide a recorded copy of joint access agreement between two motel properties. AIRPORT The proposed site is located slightly west of the airport's extended centerline. The impact of aircraft operations is considered minor, however, the aircraft operations should be acknowledged by the project applic rnts. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent prop(rty. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION 0 = PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse imp ict on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonabl r available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environn ental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appell within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. PUBLICATION DATE: June 01, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: May 25, 1998 SIGNATURI:S: Greggj ..----) ii i Derma , Adfnmistrator DATE / 99 q Departm r(t of anning/Building/Public Works 4Cha.,,,..._ - st n, A mi i rator DAT Community,ervices ,, i 1., j......D7 ..., ece— ier, irk Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DC C CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLIC,\NT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCR PTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,0E 2 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek r ins along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCAT ON OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway MITIGP TION MEASURES: 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRW) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. 5. The culvert for bridging Panther Creek shall be sized to convey flows from 100-year floods. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The applicant shall provide further details about the sizing of the culvert, subject to the approval of the Renton Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. East VE Iley Highway Motel LUA-98-062,SA-A,ECF Mitigation Measures & Conditions (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Mitigal ion Measures (Continued) 7. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x $75 = $45,936.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Ste Plan for the East Valley Highway Motel, File No. LUA-98-066, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a calculation verifying that a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verify that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this information to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan/landscape plan to provide a continuous planting of shrubs along the north property boundary to screen the parking area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a recorded easement allowing use of the Nendels Motel site for the purpose of a secondary, emergency access. The easement shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division and recorded, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPL CATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPL CANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,)82 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- site aid 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not si ibject to the appeal process for environmental determinations FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. E eparate plans and permits for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. 2. One-hour construction, no sprinkler substitution, one-hour occupancy separation A3/R1 & B/R1, elevator lobbies one hour. PLAN REVIEW STOF M DRAINAGE: 1. Tlie Storm System Development Connection charge is $5,727.72. 2. Tile Storm Detention /Treatment Vault plan must to be submitted for structural and access approval. A,.acess opening to be 36-inches. 3. Provide vertical profile. 4. C we requirements and Special requirements are to be addressed as listed in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. City of Renton Drafting Standards to be followed. 6. Panther Creek is a stream that the Corps has commented is within their jurisdiction and any work impacting the stream would require a Section 404 permit. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,929.71. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. A vertical profiles of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. East NJ alley Highway Motel LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A Advisory Notes (Continued) 4. Si le sewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-ft. Proposed floor elevation as shown is 21.4-feet. 6. Vc rtical profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. WATER: 1. If equired fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be in a 15-ft. Utility easement. The required fireflow per Fire Prevention is 3500 gpm. 2. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Therefore, four (4) fire hydrants will be required. 3. Tt e primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The se::ondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. A 10-inch loop water line is needed to get the fire flow above the required 3500 gpm. A 10-inch loop wi I provide 4000 gpm of fire flow. 5. Tr ere will be a System Development Connection charge is $8,590.48. 6. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 7. VE rtical profile will be required showing the water system.. 8. A double Detector Check Valve Assembly for the fire flow to be located at the back of sidewalk in a va Jlt. TRAN 3PORTATION: 1. A brief traffic distribution report to be provided. 2. Provide a recorded copy of joint access agreement between two motel properties. AIRPORT The proposed site is located slightly west of the airport's extended centerline. The impact of aircraft operations is considered minor, however, the aircraft operations should be acknowledged by the project applic< nts. CITY OF RENTON ••LL ' �� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 28, 1998 Mr. Mike Cohen MC Constructi pn 2142 Abernatt y road NE Olympia, WA 98506 SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel Project No. LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A Dear Mr. CohE n: This letter is vritten on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on May 26, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. Any ac grieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erro ieous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmontal Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be r o further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supe visor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 15, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Rentor, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional infc rmation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights r lore fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 2;5-2719. For the Enviro imental Review Committee, 6:).„kr, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Bill an j Soo An/Property Owners Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRVV) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. 5. The culvert for bridging Panther Creek shall be sized to convey flows from 100-year floods. Flow information for sizing the culvert is available from the Renton Stormwater Utility. The applicant shall provide further details about the sizing of the culvert, subject to the approval of the Renton Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $24,407.24. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. East Valley Highway Motel LUA-c 8-062,SA-A,ECF Mitiga ion Measures & Conditions (Continued) Page ,2 of 2 Mitigation Measures (Continued) 7. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $45,936 (612.48 trips x$75 = $45,936.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The E ite Plan for the East Valley Highway Motel, File No. LUA-98-066, SA-A, ECF, is apprc ved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a calculation verifying that a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Highway. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. In order to satisfy criteria for permitting off-site parking, the applicant shall demonstrate that Nendels Motel has 8 additional parking spaces beyond their own required parking needs. The off-site parking must be within 750 feet of the proposed building. The applicant shall also verify that there is a recorded parking easement benefiting the subject property. The applicant shall provide this information to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan/landscape plan to provide a continuous planting of shrubs along the north property boundary to screen the parking area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a recorded easement allowing use of the Nendels Motel site for the purpose of a secondary, emergency access. The easement shall be submitted for the approval of the Development Services Division and recorded, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A APPLICANT: MC Construction PROJECT NAME: East Valley Highway Motel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three-story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 sq. ft. and a total building area of 46,937 sq. ft. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on- site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3650 East Valley Highway Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. 2. One-hour construction, no sprinkler substitution, one-hour occupancy separation A3/R1 & B/R1, elevator lobbies one hour. PLAN REVIEW STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $5,727.72. 2. The Storm Detention /Treatment Vault plan must to be submitted for structural and access approval. Access opening to be 36-inches. 3. Provide vertical profile. 4. Core requirements and Special requirements are to be addressed as listed in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. City of Renton Drafting Standards to be followed. 6. Panther Creek is a stream that the Corps has commented is within their jurisdiction and any work impacting the stream would require a Section 404 permit. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,929.71. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. A vertical profiles of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. East Va ley Highway Motel LUA-98.062,ECF,SA-A Advisor: Notes (Continued) 4. Sid( sewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A sE wer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-f:. Proposed floor elevation as shown is 21.4-feet. 6. Verl ical profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Dra vings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. WATEF: 1. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be i i a 15-ft. Utility easement. The required fireflow per Fire Prevention is 3500 gpm. 2. OnE fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpn of fire flow. Therefore, four (4) fire hydrants will be required. 3. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. A 11)-inch loop water line is needed to get the fire flow above the required 3500 gpm. A 10-inch loop will orovide 4000 gpm of fire flow. 5. There will be a System Development Connection charge is$8,590.48. 6. Dra vings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Ver ical profile will be required showing the water system.. 8. A Double Detector Check Valve Assembly for the fire flow to be located at the back of sidewalk in a vau t. TRANS'ORTATION: 1. A I)rief traffic distribution report to be provided. 2. Provide a recorded copy of joint access agreement between two motel properties. AIRPORT The proposed site is located slightly west of the airport's extended centerline. The impact of aircraft operatic ns is considered minor, however, the aircraft operations should be acknowledged by the project applicai its. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Leaal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRUNMtN IAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal The Environmental Review Committee newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language project under the authority of the Renton continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Municipal Code. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL PP 9by P LUA-98-062.ECF,SA-A State of Washington for King County. Environmental review and site approval The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County for an 88 unit motel. Location: 3650 E. Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Valley Highway. during the below stated period, The annexed notice, a The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will East Valley Highway Motel end at 5:00 PM on June 15, 1998.Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use as published on: 6/1/98 Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- ject file and the mitigation measures bThe full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $38.40 imosed Environmental onmenntal CommitteetReviewhetyof entDare Legal Number 4713 available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- �n` 2550. Appeal procedures are available in G v/ the City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal Building. Le I e? rk; Sunty Journal Publication Date: June 01, 1998 Published in the South County Journal June 1, 1998.4713 nn Subscribed and sworn before me on this 1 aay of L 19�6. rarN � ;r '!.. � �� Notary 9 �• � / �. Public of the State of Washington Go residing in Renton • King County, Washington • N�_ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL LUA-98-062,ECF,SA-A Environmental review and site approval for an 88 unit motel. Location: 3650 E. Valley Highway. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on June 15, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: (425) 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Pub! cation Date: June 01, 1998 Acco ant No. 51067 dnsm)ub.dot • i4.0TCE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY MOTEL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA.98-062,ECF,SA-A Proposal for a three-story,88 unit motel with a building footprint of 18,082 sq.ft.and a total building area of 46,937 sq.ft. The proposal Includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on adjacent property. Primary access Is via a driveway off East Valley Highway,with an emergency access connecting to through adjacent property to the south. Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property In a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25 foot setback from the creek. Location: 3850 East Valley Highway. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM June 15, WI. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fad,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take fuller action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timetrame. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huener,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]must be filed In writing on or • before 5:00 PM June 15.1998.If no appeals are filed by this date,the action will become final.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 675.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from theRenton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235- 2501. ll l T„• •.a-e •I16 • jvnza• ; = _ at o UNLING TON .Q•�' • 9 ,p = NANTNINN 4- ivs Pan CA C•N FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,P ESASSE V SOONTACT N AT THE CITY I 2OFF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SDO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, sA/'1ok4i YY'k- r th , hereby certify that .3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on rArm tim t I qRg • Signed: ctmattir 'W AAAAn' ' ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and r the State of d Washington residing in -4 o.-v-r-' ,on the S day o LA./40201 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: MAY 20, 1998 TO: PETER ROSEN FROM: NEIL WATTS /v2u) SUBJECT: EAST VALLEY BEST WESTERN-3650 EAST VALLEY ROAD REVISED SEPA RECOMMENDATIONS We have reexamined the above listed project for drainage concerns at ERC's request. Since our initial review, plans for rerouting the major flows from Panther Creek to the north (via the wetlands east of SR-167) have been delayed due to concerns expressed by WSDOT. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed project should be examined assuming that the flooding problem experienced in the past in this vicinity will remain unchanged. Therefore, after consultation with Ron Straka (Supervisor, Surface Water Utility), we recommend the following conditions be placed upon the project through the SEPA process. 1. Prior to approval of construction or building permits for the project, the applicant shall expand upon their drainage report by analyzing the stream/channel across the site with routed flows from the East Side Green River Watershed (ESGRW) Plan (92 cfs) through the channel using the HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation for the 100 year storm event. A Level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbrook Creek shall also be prepared and submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto the adjacent southerly property by providing a minimum berm elevation of one foot over the 100-year storm event elevation in the channel. 3. The new building floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel, and the parking lot elevation shall not be less than the 100-year storm event elevation for the channel. 4. To help minimize or reduce the flooding problem, the applicant shall excavate a shelf along the north side of the channel on the property within the 25 foot setback area. This excavation shall extend down to one foot above the ordinary high water mark, with a 3:1 slope within the 25 foot set-back area. The buffer area on both sides of the channel shall be planted with suitable trees and/or vegetation to provide shade for the channel. This work will need to be coordinated with Fisheries Department for their HPA permit requirements. cc: Ron Straka Clint Morgan IRRENT CONDITIONS 6.4 EXISTING VALLEY AREA DRAINAGE SYSTEM 6.4.1 SPRINGBROOK CREEK The existing Valley area surface water conveyance system is illustrated on Figure 6-2. The primary drainage system in the Valley area is Springbrook Creek, which extends north from the City of Kent to the Black River Pump Station (BRPS). Figure 6-6A includes photographs of selected reaches. Tributary to Springbrook Creek are Mill and Garrison creeks (Kent), Panther Creek, and Rolling Hills Creek These streams originate on the plateaus east of the Green River Valley and are supplemented by localized inflow within the Valley. Springbrook Creek flows north along the Valley floor to the BRPS, which discharges through the last remaining reach of the Black River into the Green River. The Black River today is a small remnant of the old Black River that drained Lake Washington before construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal and Ballard Locks, which lowered Lake Washington and diverted flows from the Black River. • Several of the main drainage features along Springbrook Creek downstream of SW 16th Street were constructed as part of past ESGRWP improvements that have been largely funded by the NRCS (formerly SCS). These features include the BRPS,a large storage pond known as the BRPS floodwater storage pond, the Grady Way and I-405 box culverts, retaining walls along Oakesdale Avenue and the SW 16th Street Bridge, and widened and realigned portions of Springbrook Creek between the BRPS and SW 16th Street. A construction project to improve the SW Grady Way to SW 16th Street reach by constructing a parallel channel that flows through the I-405 box culvert was completed in summer 1995. This project is referred to as the Connecting Channel Project, and its location is illustrated on Figure 6-2. Upstream 'of SW 16th Street, Springbrook Creek is much narrower, but has been deepened and widened in past years by farmers, local jurisdictions, and King County Drainage District No. 1 (DD No. 1). 6.4.2 PANTHER CREEK Panther Creek originates in the plateau area in the eastern portion of the basin and drains an approximately 2-square-mile basin. Panther Creek originates at Panther Lake in unincorporated King County and flows in a northwesterly direction toward the City of Renton (see Figure 6-1). Panther Creek enters the Valley area at the base of Talbot Hills just west of Talbot Road. In this area, the creek flows through an alluvial fan and the creek channel becomes braided. Low flows enter two culverts under SR-167, which are the southernmost culverts between I-405 and SW 43rd Street. The two culverts are shown on Figure 6-2 in SR-167 between SW 34th Street and SW 39th Street. These culverts discharge to a short drainage channel that connects to an approximately 3,000-foot-long pipe X1159121.801 DECEMBER 1996 R. W.Beck 6-3 SECTION 6 system along the East Valley Road (EVR) and SW 34th Street. This pipe system discharges to Springbrook Creek. Moderate and high Panther Creek,flows split where the channel becomes =. braided. Some of the flow enters the two culverts under SR-167 and some is directed north into the Panther Creek Wetland. Panther Creek flows also exceed the capacity of the two southernmost SR-167 culverts during large storms, and excess flows travel north into the Panther Creek Wetland. Flows entering the wetland are temporarily stored and/or discharged to the west under SR-167 through a series of existing culverts ranging from 12 to 48 inches in diameter as well as a 36-inch-high by 48-inch-wide box culvert at the north end of the wetland near I-405. With the exception of the 36-inch by 48-inch box culvert, many of these culverts are severely plugged,limiting their capacity. The Panther Creek Wetland outflows from the SR-167 culvert crossings between approximately SW 23rd Street and SW 34th Street enter a ditch/wetland system (Wetland W-48e) located along the west side of SR-167. This system drains to a pipe system in EVR through an open ditch at approximately SW 29th Street. The EVR pipe system extends north and discharges to an existing channel along SW 23rd Street that flows west to Springbrook Creek. • During flooding conditions, Panther Creek flows that pass through the two southernmost SR-167 culverts can exceed the capacity of the 3,000-foot-long pipe system along EVR/SW 34th Street. As a result, flooding of private property and EVR occurs. In addition, the system also overflows to the north to enter the ditch/wetland that runs along the west side of SR-167. 6.4.3 ROLLING HILLS CREEK Rolling Hills Creek originates on a plateau area in the northeastern portion of the basin and drains an approximate 1.4-square-mile drainage basin. Rolling Hills Creek enters a pipe system within the Renton Shopping Center on the north side • of I-405. The pipe system discharges to a short section of channel running west along the north side of I-405 (see Figure 6-2). The creek then runs south under I-405 through 48-inch-diameter and 132-inch-diameter culvert crossings. From • the I-405 crossing,a low-flow channel carries runoff along the east side of SR-167 to a 36-inch-high by 48-inch-wide box culvert that crosses west underneath SR-167. This culvert connects to a 60-inch-diameter system that flows west to Springbrook Creek. During intense storms, the capacity of the 36-inch-high by 48-inch-wide box culvert is exceeded, causing water to be stored in the Panther Creek Wetland. During periods of extreme flows,flows from both Panther Creek and Rolling Hills Creek become interconnected as the entire Panther Creek Wetland area is flooded. Following a major storm event, this stored runoff is released from the wetland and flows return to their respective low-flow channels. 6-4 R. W. Beck DECEMBER 1996 X1159121.801 • ' • •_ I • SS • ° Sync • Picture Number 3 - Flooding of East Valley Road between SW 27th Street and SW 34th Street during 1/9/90 flood Picture taken near the soutwest corner of SW 27th Street and East Valley Road looking south owi - •i J cs `� 711.1100L4'. n • • Picture Number 4 - Flooding of SW 43rd Street and East Side Green River Watershed Project adjacent parking lots between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue SW during 1/9/90 flood FIGURE 6-6B(Continued) Picture taken near the northwest corner of East Valley Road and SW 43rd Street looking west Photographs of Problem Areas ,_...........maimmw. -. Av:::.'''''''' '''''''''''' ''''''''' 44:1- .10rolf - ::::::::-1:-1,:•,"......1,:\:•:\\:9/•<.::1‘ii\iL, . • "mow, • 1141 11 if c..-1 ."...:.. :".,: % e't " ')i t' %7\,0' \\,..„....,,,, ?Ti .,.. ‘Af• 9'6 -\•'-----:::'''' • N • 1 I Q 'Ve )) 1-...,_)i 1 1 .,/ 4)' e•-•„/ RD S 16\ ......----------'''''''-- L /1; ct- i I ---.,..) \ stri• • c 11 ::•;;;..,,1 1 1.., !...::: \3) - - . ......':•-• 49,11 ni----...------....::::-... ct.5311 cr'i/ i 'I's- ,-;::::'-... ,(• 'x-...........---- ..-- ................ ii --!• i 16. r-- ,c. •-• -................_.7.7:::...1r- _____---------_ C:........ni= N-'1 - ,- * -,...................,............._.„.... ,/.........----- -----.....„.42;:i nil . ..--- VALLEY 1.-- c, TALB,OT....„-. -C...R ET.:._90ThErR CREEK WERM4D I i • _till. _......../efr.„...-',-;,..s.:::.!.....1.. .................. HcEoNsr,TAALL Lt... ..,,:,- ...................... ......... -- _. . / nil I ..... --,.. ,.... ,....._.............. ....... ........... .. _..._ ...=..._..._ -.......... / ' AIP •... ..------ • et I C.:: :-i;.,t:-..'s .....,. • 36 36" \ • ' I'''..Z: - .......-- .asezumazsarsourannardrariminnsminzarArAr 1 r ... -----..i.: - .--...........--eteresuser4r,-ArAirAmagraungemer ArArAvArAre... -"JP'.j"114 - . E ; VALLEY !("4". // PIC-3 O. RD 0 .. .. I coil I- I cn . : I 1' . . , ,... ? / Nrimio, , I to CV 1 • t-.4i 1.41, col . 3 I I 48" 6511 . 60" . i ...: . ........ ..::::: :: . \' -.• ' .............-'..............s's , .. „g*1 ::::.....7....................... ....-fravAlarz.r/ikAusrarizaviivAir ia AV ; ; S g 1(7•31.11.112rP4r1C47 1 1..=, co co cn; i i 1 i •CN1 -0 p_, , LI, 1 i.--- 10°9' -.iv 0/ ... r, ,_ v,• . ........3........._. .. , , ,, ,...... , „r0 .. ., , , .., ....,_,.., .„.. , , ,,,, ..., ..._ ,., .... , „ r,4 co • z:7- • i _.------ v) i ,. !! v)i •-"" c...cy. I 1-. _ . ' • 15 .. i...... 1--P urLEGEND " _.... - A ,..._....... . cI,sk ......... _, 36" OAKESDALE AV SW i 1 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN !: 36"rsk'> Of ,/, • Nkt - • —P• STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL CULVERT(S) cc 1 1 1 i. It 10004 I./ fit • C_., Z OBSERVED FLOODED AREAS (ONLY AREAS I 1 ca- I (r) WITHIN STUDY AREA ARE SHOWN) I C-1 II. LOCATION/DIRECTION OF PICTURE \\,.. ill NO. 1, REFER TO FIGURE 6-6 I i ' .'1.1*---<.-1:j I I MILL _. 1.-i 1:1 1 I 11 1' --?.--CREEK '...._....,, TUKWILA Ves R a i 1 1 \s--- - RENTON CITY LIMITS _ .....-. EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER ---------• - ---•••-•-•.- _ ..-...,-----. - WATERSHED PROJECT -. -. RR ..........-- ---.- ....,--....-..... ...,., .......-.. FLOOD AREAS -:-.... .. ; .\s„.4.......,..,,,/ CURRENT CONDITIONS filWi 11 { (K ___. Neil R. Watts From: Ronald J. Straka To: Neil R. Watts Cc: Clinton E. Morgan Subject: RE: Drainage Concerns? - 3650 E Valley Rd - Best Western Hotel Date: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 1 :14PM This is a tough one. The ESGRW Plan called for restricting flow in the channel by diverting a portion of the flow on the upstream side of SR -167 into the wetland to flow through the new culvert at SW 23rd St. that will hopefully be constructed this year. This would reduce the flooding problem on the site, on Nendels Motel site and on East Valley. However the diversion of the f►ows has been postponed due to WSDOT and Fisheries issues that remain to be worked out. I cannot guarantee that some of the flow will be diverted into the wetland in the future, but I think the chances are better than 50%. The primary flooding problem is due to the lack of capacity in the downstream storm system in East Valley and SW 34th St. Given all of this information, here are some of my ideas for mitigation measures that we will need to discuss: 1 . Could we require them to improve the channel to convey the 100-year flow that is currently conveyed across th) site? 2. At a riinimum, the consultant should be required to route the flows from the ESGRW Plan (92 cfs) through tie channel using HEC 2 model to establish the water surface elevation. A level 3 offsite analysis of the downstream storm system from the site to Springbook Creek will also be needed. 3. Improve the berm on the south side of the channel to prevent the channel from overflowing onto Nendels property to provide one foot of freeboard above the 100 year water surface elevation. 4. Set the building finished floor (and parking maybe) at an elevation above the 100-year storm water surface elevation in the stream. 5. Based upon the 100-year water surface elevation on the site and the sites topography, compensatory flood storage may be required. 6. To address comment #5 and to reduce the flooding problem, the applicant could be required to excavate a shelf ak Ong the channel on the property within the 25-foot set-back area. The excavation could extend down to Erne foot above the ordinary high water mark and the buffer area on both sides of the channel could be planted to provide shade. The applicant will need to coordinate with Fisheries about the work and any HPA equirements. This will provide more flood storage on the site which may prevent flooding of East Valley and Nendels. 7. The cr lvert crossing under East Valley Rd. is a 24-inch culvert and connects to a storm system on the west side of East Valley Rd, which is a 36-inch storm system. To reduce the flooding the culvert crossing could be replaced with a new 36-inch culvert. During flood events, flow in the ditch ponds up and overflows onto East Valley where the ditch flows into the culvert under East Valley Rd. I am not sure if this is due to ihe fact that the 24" culvert is under sized or the downstream system lacks capacity. It is probably Moth. I am not sure how much reduction of flooding would occur if the existing 24-inch culvert is replaced with a 36" culvert, but the applicant could look at this option. Again, Fisheries may need to be involved. I recommE nd requiring mitigation measures 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Mitigation measures 2 and 4 could be considered code. Please let me know what you are going to recommend to ERC. From: Neil R. Watts To: Ronald J. Straka Cc: Clinton E. Morgan Subject: Drainage Concerns? - 3650 E Valley Rd - Best Western Hotel Date: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 9:58AM As you probably know, we are reviewing a proposal for a hotel at 3650 East Valley Road. This site contains a portion of the Panther Creek system, and is identified as a flooding area in the East Side Green River EIS. What do you recommend for mitigation, if any, for this proposal? ERC has the project on hold pending staff response to this question. Page 1 City.,. ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/F,..,,,,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: labktcc COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA 76,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25'setback from the creek. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS CNVL Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation LancYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services \./ Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 24.26 police calls for service annually, based on the size of the business. Construction sites in Renton account for 9% of all Commercial Burglaries . In addition, this business is going to be constructed in the highest commercial Burglary crime area in the City. Recommend that the business be surrounded by portable, temporary fencing during the construction phase. Applicant will also need security lighting on the site during the hours of darkness. All construction materials and tools will need to be secured as well as possible to help prevent theft. If a portable trailer is used for an office while construction is underway, it will need to have any doors and windows reinforced with metal bars to help prevent burglary. All office tools and XXXXAXXFP/-X MX.XMAXOk machines need to be secured; computers and fax machines should be cabled to walls or floors , and record needs to be kept of all model and serial numbers in the event oftheft. The correct "No Trespassing" signs need to be posted on the exterior of the temporary security fencing (refer to attached Trespass Information flier) . The hotel itself should have electronic locks on all guest rooms , and the same locks on the exterior of the building. The only entry available to non-guests or those checking in, should be via the front door. The adjacent Nendel 's Hotel has had Burglary and Robbery problems in the I past. Recommend that the business use a drop-safe for excess cash. The business owners should also strongly consider the use of off-duty police or private security to patrol the business during; the hours of darkness. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ILe" Signature of Directo r Aut orized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 , ; Renton Police Department %it'd' CITIZEN REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME STATISTICS ' ' Name: Date of Request: Phone No(s): East Valley Hwy Motel 4-28-98 Address: City State Zip Fax No: 3650 East Valley Rd. Renton WA Location: Incidents in this report took place between the 3000 —4000 blocks of Grid(s) East Valley Rd. The majority of the incidents occurred between 3600 — 3800 blk. Time Span Reviewed: 4-28-97 through 4-28-98 TYPE OF CRIME TOTAL TALLY/COMMENTS ASSAULT 1 AUTO THEFT/RECOVERED 16 Includes vehicles stolen elsewhere,found in Renton. CHILD NEGLECT 1 COMMERCIAL BURGLARY 13 COUNTERFEIT 1 COURT ORDER SERVED 1 D.U.I. 1 FRAUD/FORGERY 4 HIT AND RUN 6 INDECENT EXPOSURE 1 LOST PROPERTY 3 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 6 POSESS STOLEN PROPERTY 1 PARKING VIOLATION 1 SHOPLIFTING 7 SUSPICIOUS PERSONS 2 THEFT MISCELLANEOUS 7 THEFT FROM VEHICLES 17 THREATS 2 VEHICLE ACCIDENTS 11 VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER 1 TOTAL REPORTS: 103 Prepared By: Date: Audrey Moore/Crime Prevention 235-2571 4-28-98 S �' ' • �D G 0 D: i out im o R E N T O N Police ReDnton MM�N epartment Garry C. Anderson, STAC Chief • Business CRIME PREVENTION Watch UNIT 235-2571 March, 1998 Dear South Renton Merchants, I recently completed an analysis of Commercial Burglary in Renton for 1997, and found seve•al interesting patterns to share with you concerning this crime. Last year there were 302 Commercial Burglaries reported in the City limits of Renton. In 70% of these cases, the burglars gaincd entry to the businesses by using various types of force. The most common ways to break into i building in 1997 were: • Pry a door. • Smash/break a window. • Climb the fence surrounding a construction site or business. • Cut or pry off locks or padlocks. The i most common types of businesses to steal from were: • Offices 18% of all burglaries • Retail 15% of all burglaries • Restaurants 10%of all burglaries • Construction sites 9% of all burglaries. The 'nost popular items to steal from a business during a burglary were: • Nothing stolen 31% (possibly because alarms activated) • Cash 21% • Tools 14% • Computers 11% Businesses in the South Renton Business Watch newsletter group reported the most in- stanc es of Commercial Burglary, at 37% of all crimes reported. This area's preferred locations to burg arize are: • 2200 - 3600 blocks of East Valley Road. 27 burglary reports, 1997. • 800 - 2700 Lind Ave SW block. 8 burglary reports, 1997. Citizens and Police: Partners for a Safe Community. SOUTH RENTON BUSINESS-RELATED CRIMES RECAP FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998. CRIME/LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: $LOSS: AUTO THEFT: 100 SW 7th St. block White '98 Toyota 4-Runner stolen. No license plates. $27,000. 100 SW Grady Way block White'97 Suzuki 4-door stolen, license#709 HUZ. $12,800. 200 SW 41st St. block '82 Toyota truck stolen in King County/found in Renton. 600 Naches Ave SW block '91 Honda Civic stolen from Issaquah/found in Renton. 1100 SW 16th St. block '84 Datsun truck stolen/found 3 days later by Federal Way Police. $ 2,500. 1100 SW 16th St. block '81 Toyota Corolla stolen from Kent/found in Renton. 3900 East Valley Rd. block White'94 Chevy Camaro convertible stolen, license#466FFT. $16,000. COMMERCIAL BURGLARY: 300 SW 43rd St.block Door glass smashed/cash stolen from cash register. $340.00 3700 East Valley Rd. block Window pried/headphones stolen. $ 130.00 CRIMINAL TRESPASS: 1000 SW 34th St. block 11 adults arrested for trespassing on business property that was posted with the correct No Trespassing signs. (For sign info,call 425-235-2571). FRAUD: 400 S.43rd St. block Prescription forgery reported. Case under investigation. 4100 Lind Ave SW block 1 adult employee arrested for using a company credit card machine and transferring money into a personal bank account. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: 600 SW 13th St. block Parked vehicle's door and window struck with a pellet gun. $ 600.00 4200 East Valley Rd. block Window smashed out of a parked vehicle. $ 100.00 THEFTS: 41st SW/Oakesdale Ave SW Car Prowl/window smashed/stereo stolen. $1495.00 300 SW 43rd St. block Cash stolen from unsecured cash drawer in an open business. $ 150.00 600 SW 43rd St.block Car Prowl/window smashed/stereo stolen. $ 100.00 600 SW 43rd St.block Wallet stolen from locker in an unsecured area of a business. $ 55.00 1100 SW 16th St.block Car Prowl/door lock punched/unknown losses. $ 200.00 1100 SW 16th St. block Car Prowl/vinyl top entry/unknown losses. 1100 SW 16th St. block Car Prowl/door lock punched/unknown losses. $ 200.00 1600 Lind Ave SW block Car Prowl/unknown entry/wallet,climbing gear and backpack taken. $1350.00 3700 East Valley Rd. block Shoplift/1 adult arrested/misc. tools stolen. $ 40.00 4200 East Valley Rd. block Car Prowl/window smashed/CD player and CD's stolen. $1665.00 DRUG/ALCOHOL ARRESTS: There was 1 DUI arrest and two drug related arrests in the South Renton area, in February, 1998. • 400 - 600 Monster Rd SW block. 7 burglary reports, 1997. • 500 - 1600 SW 16th St. block. 7 burglary reports, 1997. • 20 - 1000 SW 7th St. block. 6 burglary reports, 1997. • 800 - 1400 SW Grady Way. 6 burglary reports, 1997. • 900 Powell Ave SW block. 5 burglary reports, 1997. The South Renton Business Watch area also reports the highest number of repeat-victim burglaries. This means that businesses in this part of town report 68% of all the crimes where the same business gets victimized more than once annually. This information is intended to assist you in estimating your risk to be the victim of a Commercial Burglary in Renton. By knowing that burglars primarily use force by prying or breaking a window to gain entry to the business, you know that you need to strengthen the security of all your doors and windows. This analysis also shows that burglars prefer to steal unsecured cash, tools and computers left on the premises. You should consider locking up all cash and tools, and using wire cables to secure your computers to your office areas. You also know now which streets in your area are preferred targets by burglars. If you are located on one of these streets, and your business is an office, retail, restaurant or construction site, you need to take a hard look at the physical security of your business. The Renton Police Department offers free Security Survey's to any business which calls to make the request. A Security Survey is when a member of the Crime Prevention Unit comes out to your business to check your security and offer suggestions on how to strengthen your property to keep the criminals out. If you are interested in this free service, please give me a call. Sincerely, rludnecy %Dace Business Watch-Coordinator Renton Police Department, (425) 235-2571 ` t During the month of January, 1998, 1/3 of all business related crimes reported in the South Renton area, regarded stolen and recovered stolen vehicles. 36% of these Auto Thefts occurred in the 3700 block of East Valley Road. In addition to the Auto Thefts, there were 7 Car Prowl incidents reported, with the majority also occurring along East Valley Road. Commercial business parking lots are a preferred location for Auto Theft and Car Prowls to occur because of the many vehicles that are left parked there during the course of the day. A thief has the ability to "shop" many of these cars, and choose which one he wants to steal, or steal from. To help prevent Auto Theft and Car Prowl remember to take these easy steps: Lock your car. Keep your windows rolled up and all of your doors locked. If you have a car alarm, use it every time you leave your vehicle. Clean it up. Remove all loose objects from your car such as clothing, purses, wallets, cellular phones and cash. These items only serve to make your vehicle an attractive target for thieves. Park it wisely. When in a business district, try to park as closely to the business as possible, so that you can observe it from the inside of the business. If you're going to be away from your car when it's dark, park it under a light. Employees should try and get into the habit of checking on the parking lot several times a day. Target hardening. A car alarm or other security device, such as The Club, are always recommended. Car thieves and Car Prowlers will choose the easy targets first every time. The point in having a car alarm or theft prevention tool is that it slows down the criminal and makes it more difficult for him to conduct the theft. This increases the chance that he may choose a different target, and also increases his chances of getting caught. Aseeizery Nome Business Watch Coordinator Renton Police Department, (425) 235-2571 t, Trespass vs: BUSINESS E n f o r c e m e n t WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code#6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, preventing the more serious crimes from takingplace. police may be preve g N'Y COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT y�'i� 235 - 2571 City.., ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/Fuuu� Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t'ay4 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: :650 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA: 6,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY 01.PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: PanthE r Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' setback from the creek. A. ENVIROJMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline L se Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS •f .2 _L f/7• 2,6-2,/ • h 46'7' d Cam«. fl1a-v-2 gi,e efc1/4_ a/J/2-744,2A au4. t/Y-) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ` . , 1g) We have review xi this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. to - -� , / (I-AZ' 4--- " /2-4/9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date \ DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 `l 1 Cny_. ..enton Department of Planning/Building/Fu.,,,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . c.".Se tce4 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 t y OF RENTON APPLICATION, NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 �.. APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TI1 LE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 rT 2 { 1998 LOCATION: ;3650 East Valley Hwy ",""s•~ SITE AREA: '76,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' s,atback from the creek. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Ilse Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental h aaith Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 6667 H ('1 O f Ji To I N64 / O/V L` (-(O J f2 7-isT12LflO No S177) ( IKL" -C" Sv8 lTUT1' Dom& Hok-)2 CDC -)P/{-/.-)C- Y ��P� RArioti 3 / i I .t F3//R I �L�V�4Tof2 L_ceisi t=S OrJL (-to0c-2 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additions I information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Di ector or AuthorizeOepresentative Date DEVAPP DOC Rev 10193. C,RF pR F IRE DEP.�. VF�T!n gUREii City vs Renton Department of Planning/Building/P,..,,,,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIgal14998ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4:1YG ReeueArkt . COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 VEL APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: :650 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA: 76,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via z driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: PanthE r Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' st•tback from the creek. A. ENVIRO VMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline L se Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental H'alth Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resource s Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • /VQ ill,4� oP wC ( aJl B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS• , A, /-* C. CODE-F ELATED COMMENTS CD M t ert,1 We have revieR ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additions,information isne4ded to properly assess this proposal. c:<, ff -4-#1 ' /A1119fr Signature of Dir ctor or Authorized Refiresentative Date DEVAPP.DcC Rev.10/93 • G< /C O'er CITY OF RENTON -NTO FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 22, 1998 TO: Planner FF'.OM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 4-- SU BJECT: East Valley Motel , Best Western- V50 Easy Valley Hwy. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 3500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installations. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$24407.24 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the total building square footage. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • City enton Department of Planning/Building/ Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ? Q.42V t ems) We,CX— COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 CITY or aFr.TTON LOCATION: 3350 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA: 73,022 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 198 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,O82.6A sad WiatathilAtig area of 46,937 3.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' set hack from the creek. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hearth Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet M P C f s rei Le "x7, fed 'e i- chi,/ revie a) tat so mr e-...72d B. POLICY-RE LATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELI,TED COMMENTS We have reviewed th s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionaldd� informationfiscneeded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEV APP.DOC Rev.10/93 • East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway .EIS Review April30, 1998 WATER: 1. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be in a 15-ft. Utility easement. The required fireflow per Fire Prevention is 3500 gpm. 2. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Therefore, four(4)fire hydrands will be required. 3. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. A 10-inch loop water line is needed to get the fire flow above the required 3500 gpm. A 10- inch loop will provide 4000 gpm of fire flow. 5. There will be a System Development Connection charge is $ 8,5 90,`-� 6. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Vertical profile will be required showing the water system.. 8. A Double Detector Check Valve Assembly for the fire flow to be located at the back of sidewalk in a vault. 98cm077 98CM077 W.DOC\ PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIE\ 98 —oa J ■ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER yy APPLICADIT: m„Ht- Co W RECEIVED FROM (1A4 4-7�-7--3 JOB ADDP ESS: 3(tea £q.s- liA t LEy /4 6/74 .IV WO# (date) NATURE OF WORK: Misr 1/gcto`. 64KA,wAy /41/1TEL GREEN# ge SPECI AL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED ❑ This fie review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated 0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 3023 0-c----9/J 6- 0 King Co.Tax Acct#(new) It is the intent o this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of:he property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site imps ovements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined ,y the applicable Utility Section. Please note that hese fees arc subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following qr oted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSI;SSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer A reement t vt)OTHER ME Special Assessment District/WATER 1111111111 Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER 7001 0I 2 MIMI , tv Joint Use Agreement I TRO Local Improvement District - -- * Traffic Benefd Zones $75.00 PER TRIP CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBI IGATIONS -- SYSTEM DEV.'sLOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partiall Pd td Exem.tion) SI Never Pd S S. FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelli . unit$680/unit in lark 11111111111111111111 Apartment, C ondo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial $0.113/s•. ft. of •ro•err (not less than$850.00)x 7,02:2_ $,S p g Boeing,by Specir.I Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter R,Soo cent threshold) SYSTEM DEVI LOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partiall Pd td Exem.tion) IR Never Pd Single family residential dwelli unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Cando$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial $0.078/s.. ft. of .ro•ert (not less than$585.00) x 7(oa2_2_ ' S' 7-9, / REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New- Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partial) Pd td Exem•tion 441 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwellin, unit$385/unit x All other properties $0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x i (not less than $385.00) 4/9'`tlo/ S 727, 71 PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ 20, 2Y7, Imo/ t?�u 45 ./1/C Signature of Revie ng Authority DATE o0 *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. a **The square footage figures used arc taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. r' c:/tcmpletdfccapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506, 4507, 4508,4525, and 4526 S co City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Fuu11. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:1 v Y- .4,3.11 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen Cm'OFRFM,OId PROJECT Tll LE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: 650 East Valley Hwy APP 2 i 189a SITE AREA: ;6,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): iz)ur4-4-ogav ka SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total builds g1olv area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panthe Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' setack from the creek. A. ENVIROl MENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation '--- Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet `1 t 3 c_ ((-) e f D r y'r°G'/eez B. POLICY-RL'LATED COMMENTS C. CODE-REL)1 TED COMMENTS We have reviewed t/'s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info,nation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway .EIS Review April 30, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation charge is $75 per trip end. The ITE Trip Generation Manual is the document used for estimating the number of trips. The total charge is$ 45,936.00. 2. A brief traffic distribution report to be provided. 3. Provide recorded copy of joint access agreement between the two motel properties. 98cm077T 98CM077T.DOC\ n � • • AKE: • ....1"7117) saw ,cL �T n""° .+,.uV�"1Y�'�t�'MW%aN.Ge�IOw»a�+-..ew«»a+ « .+rYNQYTc*•iyqrw...""""'y� N �:x ,�„ .ia:> K '131 t' PRT �, TE V= l I1 G C N FEET Project Name Gas/ VaIIril /-lu)cl No1z I ( 3e,7 U)e 7ev,r ) Project Address 3650 Eeks1 V(; iI(c� Han) Contact Person M r ke Colie v► MC. Cogs tvuct,o,r Address 2Iu2 Aloe✓ticilr Kd A� 01014/0 y 48506 Phone Number 3 6 0 - y 5 6 - 650 7 • Permit Number L UA - g q - 062 Project Description 3 s rtv✓y S 6017, wrote I ) (, b/d vi o6 / D 22- I►,cI►ulea .22 pa✓k► spac.e4 ozr-5rtr g o►.r y tl �vicel. Land Use Type: Method_ol Calculation: Hlote I (310) ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual P'je 51 q — 0/Retail 0 Traffic Study Daly trip rate 13 Non-retail 0 Other Ocuc pled &on34 Vic( .70 0la;ly IopJ Calculation: A550wie gd 70 occutahci to 10-7a l DAsii Tvrrs . ( 8$)( . .76) (o, `ao) = 612 daily -tv►PS At 75 tat'' ry - (612 - 49)( $75 ) _ 6, g36, oO Transportation Mitigation Fee: 4 5 j q 36 ; o(, Calculated by: • /V&,l (ri/ i Date: Lihz l8 Account Number: !OS. 5 RR. 3)SD. 7 0. D0. Date of Payment • City yr Renton Department of Planning/Building/Fuu„c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SUJeftCel (AA,R1 pl ' .COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: Mike Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter RqaprioF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Hwy APR 2 1 1998 SITE AREA: 76,022 s.f. ( BUILDING AREA(gross):,� Lvi®w� �} �fVid a' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. an a total building area of 46,93:7 s.f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a driveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' setback from the creek. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandrShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental He alth Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resource; Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-PELATED COMMENTS 2.f1// i? g �a be_ 7> �/�a1- JPeG- �?�a •fe vei-' it,) Or,)-e7y11,et� C. CODE-RE,_A TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representatiy Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway .EIS Review April 30, 1998 SEWER(Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is$ S ¢Z v "r' e 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. A vertical profiles of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-ft. Proposed floor elevation as shown is 21.4-feet. 6. Vertical profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. 98crn077s 98CM077S.DOC\ y East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway EIS Review April 30, 1998 STORM(Surface Water) 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is$ 72 7, 2. The Storm Detention /Treatment Vault plan must to be submitted for structural and access approval. Access opening to be 36-inches. 3. Provide vertical profile. 4. Core requirements and Special requirements are to be addressed as listed in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. City of Renton Drafting Standards to be followed. 6. Panther Creek is a stream that the Corps has commented is within their jurisdiction and any work impacting the stream would require a Section 404 permit. 7. The City's ordinance requires a minimum 25-foot no impact buffer along the stream. 98cm077D 98CM077D.DOC\ \/ � PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEV 98 —oz., ■ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER ,�yy APPLICANT: Millt" 6oNisN RECEIVED FROM (/4 '7 --3 JOB ADDRESS: 3 G,yn C,q,r- CAI,LEy M 6MAA,Y WO# (date) NATURE OF WORK: C..qs- al4Ix/' b4tss,rvi y ,4yrEl_ GREEN# le SPECIAL.ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated . 0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PHI)# 30 23 0c---7/j$' ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) It is the intent of tt is development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improN ements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that the se fees arc subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quot:d fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER /---0:: Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) '7401 01 2 Fr f F 6,,,u 3e= Tom,,,, " Local Improves sent District * +I Traffic Benefit cones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLI GATIONS 1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, C tndo $510/unit not in CD or COR zones x t Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than$850.00)x 7w pZZ 8S9 d, yg Boeing,by Specia Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(t,soo GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) PI Never Pd . Single family t esidential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo $350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than$585.00)x `7(oO2_2_ 1 S9.9. 7/ REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) gl Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties $0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x(not less than 5385.00) Ii Vo/ S7 2 7 / � �5 �/APRELIMINARY TOTAL $ 2-�, 2/7, i `o Signature of Revie�l ig Authority DATE R Oo *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. Ct o **The square footage figures used arc taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only r' c./temptatdtceapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506,4507, 4508, 4525, and 4526 S. r9 ( - City�, Renton Department of Planning/Building/Finnic Works ENVIRCNMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ykw pot- COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: M ke Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE:: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: 36: 0 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA: 76,022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OFF ROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a d iveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' setback from the creek. A. ENVIRONJVENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Noise Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet The attached diagram shows that the proposed site is located slightly west of the airport's extended centerline. The hospital/Victoria Hills area is subjected to aircraft noise from Boeing Field/ King Cty Intl Airport and the hospital is used as a visual checkpoint for aircraft arr=ving Renton Airport. This area is also overflown by aircraft departing Renton airport directly south. The environmental impact elements do not address noise impacts. The impact of aircraft operations is considered minor, however, the aircraft operations should be acknowledged by the project applicants. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS None C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have reviewed tl is application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addido-. ' fol'naton i 'eded to properly assess this proposal. !:i `it .•i , .t - 23 i 177$ Signature of ID. . tor 3r Authorized Representative Date DEV APP.DOC Rev.10/93 .-- ".` —4) -----'—14 __-_-_::::-.:-.:-7.-.7-:-----:-:-:-{--- _-_-- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ,________,I,v.* , ___:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .II:i I , rilkr* °1‘1"/' VE: 1./ ,tt.0 • -/L. ., 194% .4N1 - _________________ _ �` t V ==-=== ==__=� I r ,,,, ff25-_-_-_.-:_:_:_:_:_::_::_.-._:_:_:_:_:_:_:_::_:_:_:_:_:_:__ _________________________ _______ _ _• 1 1 ,• 1 kit if :_:.„_____,,,,„„____,:____:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_::_:_::::::::::____::::::::::::„_:_:_:_,:________:_:_ .4 , _:::___:„::::::::::::_,_::::_:_::::___„::::::::„::::::::::::_____„:„___:„:„ ,,,,,_. , „.. 11/�Y! ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,. .„,..,„ A = 4 =__=_ - __ -t --__- _ ______ ________ ., _ i107.0. _) i / 1. `--- - X_______- .It.i, •,� .�-_I PIJi LI \J I al intik 4 1 K, `'-„, H-7-:-:-:-:-.- --77:-:::-:-:-:777:::-- --:::::::-:-:-:::::::-::::::::::::-:::-H-7.-:-.7-:.-H-7.-:-:-:.-:.-:-:-:-:-:-:-.7-:-N.- qT3-IIMMIVE. 11 \ .. ,.."`" ilvt16...i----- - -_ =-_- .1TL11LlJ"= r oflZ =V� - ,, �`y r '-' ,' N1� ,11I r".'.-_ r 1, N.. 1,, .a Iiii;:::-:-:-::::---,-::::::-:-:-:-.:-.:-:-:-:- __-----:-:-:-:-_-_-_-_-_-_-_,-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_,_-_-_-_- -_-_-_-_-_:k r . wt.,. .0 _____..._,____ _ ___________________________ ______ i ._. ,, , - . , . ., , ,, _Li„, 0 Yi _:_„_,_,_:_:_::::_:_:::_,_„:„::_:_:__ al] � �ni, .4 tarp 4 • _==-_y_ =======_==_======_===_ =________:_,_,_:_:_:_, _RA �,�®fit �� 1N�. . -_-„:„:::::::::::_-_::::::::::::::::::„:„:„:„.„,:,:-:_ ,-..-:::::::::::::__,__, , 4 IA N.• . ..,,,. , ink f���t ago ==__=__=____=_____=_ __=___=__= = �; �f..ii I , .F' . 1 a N t' a it�R J _©EMI mot -TAo ifiveaFgh -=_ _==-:r' a `" 1- I TIs / 1 ,.., 16 l ,Y. ,excalk„.1 441 Z „, ,,, ,, =___4 4 a 0 ..: 43[‘iclrini rairet9L- - . - 1 .. FT 544-1' mamQ D[ , �� T NICY — G1)433 A 1 -2''..11(ci'3'1._ , rtni .. .. . . -., i ,„.:. t s4;2. .P1 ul rl._ i 1 ir �a.a PI LJr''''IR 1 i ., �1. I � `010211:731, /01 ..nt• El-Ion - IT n O ern Li.: %. I -‘4.;celq[111 mirri, - - a liZeitY i " I4 ,M. "Ill'kit .M. - 400471:111-It' VY,1;; /144 IIDAhRil-IwNw IOI-i Q O Q 11��)7yt1 / Q® [yD'IRiPfl '' a I .-to It . ;t1t-*-hP1-7----II FA- - -trie.11044„ ... am fir i z. . -;itiN.314iie ,-.L.:::,r: ir- 1 ••— — •kowee0,4_,,, 41 8 W • I +1111111111111 i°;1'. .4406-a . 4 :A . gwiree,311,11 P .1 'ill' 'I . I ------- NFT 1-. - Ilk •, „ illiglW9 AT F ,. Api\ 11 = \ , %Fog) EEIV,i, ..0. 1.-----, 421.--,- .-tik i - 11, r t. :- " Allip 11';tNaw . p_ik_ 4 ,-,,, iti# J _ , ta,\:. .._,I 17 c" 4. i. o _ co co 1 „ o tiVi I&A 1 - ililift". /..'/41° ,\Itk1117 IT*,_ -j cl- mmt pm 4414,„„.' ,ri-4----.1 IV -‘ ),..-- , , I hell" .,., wrea.7... _I ils ._. ,.._,! - ir n_... it*, - sil : Liii,, 14-." :' - f M M 3NH toi , ci ,,,.1 _ .., 1 }j.,,,,,,i ,,. .,. .._, ,,....,,,, A.. 41 . .J1111 * .. ‘ 1 10.:,=:__, 7 .,— rip, .104:11-7-11 / ilS 41 .0 ' . .1 6 6 • ..ftg i i . 1M ) .. f( 1. t. r m.i._..... Al, •,. , 6 J1 / w I ...�...._ IT=�7 _ 1 — I 1:,.1 i :1 I C5Ac. Jac[c j L. +: ii • <J • c Fadd e is s� J. V. Farrello +: G,L 1,.j 1•..I m • ,K ,:;:/ John V Farrell �' n l :! I... 6.14 Ac. ,,' Nakarish, �0.1 c• 1:' 1r. �'yQ 5 7oAc. .: :..I R 6z. �2 .. •, • b��1;�c ,. . 3.51 Ac -- 2 `. y/s' 4 '�C5CAc aEo pd5 co 341� I i `teIA Emilio Pierotti i:: �;, R•8 ;a �1 �S;/,�.' g — I•; -1 r'• eir- •rr n - Lelan o �:.", i;., Al?j. S I3 Wi �\ a �L I o " lill E'4c X i L �.` - I;j �. G ':I 1f .1 e. � - '+.; I 67 m 177 I. ;:.'; :i G 0945 C.) '. o,_ az!Ac i7:' . I .'1 '. a O�Ir N ;..' 4 .. ;L >• 2 S. 36 Ty S.P. 014-81 ;yt ,�1 v �'' �' °�Jj i3, co _ .7...,g rI NM u (3) o ir,.:l. i:. Howard ,? ��. i 71.” ° .•�. Ac. ''' O _� j.:: �;► HawKins `° 0 15 !6 I I, 11 18 ti a•r=3, L:. ..'.•/ R- 20 us cc - i:•.jin,:::i 1'6 (I) 335 CA !:: ,:: Q 1 542 1,4 a /::: 1::,1 18155 r (1) v, I f ,t •'..1 1:.:. v, 'III° 5S@3101 50 N 1`:1r ..1 564 Ac. S.P. 113-77 (3) �: �A 1:::, 9Zo l05 a 23382 :03 i9 Si:3 1:::" Sam Younker t '' j TTAL3JO : VAL LEME D41114 3800 I'.1::4 /:::1 v, 1 4 ' �' CENTER (a) +Isz © , SP213-78 .C:::::3 Fli. I F 130.s3 /�7� .:� �� I i M6� ee.e• 1. NORTH CAMPUS �BINDING SITE PLAN �� �— ] c54160,E i LEGEND BUILDING n APPROX STORIES (—n HOUSE NUMBER •tort phaa,conoon EASE NOTE 1r ton.Parrtssarcoma ante."Addnung Ind attusras a yaw,war. atrita RAILROAD -rrr uLnaad Ia..Iraouonur inn r^ao.a.oprnpl•;ad on I:otn form gull ma'amma'd T� I,..Aolro In pat..),•'an:hrr'nr mtO dpllul'own,:a prunlnnUd by law MAIN THOROUGHFARE TAX t UT NUAARFR n -nurn9 t 19d7.r.-a 1 M413 r'urnoary.ix•Seanw Waan,,ntdr. ,,,Niel City r.enton Department of Planning/Building/PuU„� Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:k.OV\t_�L let`s COMMENTS DUE: MAY 5, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 21, 1998 APPLICANT: M ke Cohen/MC Construction PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: East Valley Hwy Motel WORK ORDER NO: 78375 LOCATION: 36,;0 East Valley Hwy SITE AREA: 76 022 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a three story, 88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s f. The proposal includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent property. Primary access is via a d-iveway off East Valley Highway, with an emergency access connecting to the drive on adjacent property to the south: Panther Greek runs along the south boundary of the property in a man-made channel. The proposed building maintains the required 25' setback from the creek. A. ENVIRONIVENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Healti Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ) cg6N/Y , L ft) p 4111 6e9YVVYi•-e-i,\A:c B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELi TED COMMENTS We have reviewed ttis application with particular attention to those areas in whi we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inforrnatio needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 CITY Or i ENTON DEVELOPMEN f SLRVIC:ES'DIVISION L ST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY ''OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJE-2T NAME: EAST KAL►..EY HL(*HWAY IYIoTEL APPLICATION NO: 1-0/41' 9S.062, SW - SEC The fol owing is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development ServicEs Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 6149.1-1Nuiol1/4) NoicsliEg4.1 R,au Ar, 3501 E.VAu,LIY R NTOu iVoc5 1Z5360 0OZ.0 0S EASTSRTE THEATRE,Ir Jam. srTE: 3751 E. purl Ey to. R£.n1ToN 9$06-S mau.: 919 sw TAYwR $1 #900 PORTL.AND,oft 472os 1 ZS3bo 0:›30 03 C.APTEC, NET LEASE REAI.7)I,ZN. 3750 E. Val'.EY .D R.ENTON dI OS5 30Z305 4O8Z oy SSC PRoPE'Q7Y „OLDIn)vS,SN(.. 31,00 E. VALLE.) RD RENrroN gBOSS 3C23oS 9104 OS DEVELOPk'tENT PLAN'':.;Ii CITY OF F:E4•i C) APR 1 `i1j8 RECEIVED e (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, TE.VE YlSSi&. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records ❑ King County Assessors Records ill Signed vifj,, Date il/c119A (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at j i f r;r rci 5 I iv vV on the ,/t/ day of firs,-, / , 191/S . Signed ,1?(Zii+.4 L ".: j1�A__I (Notcfy Public) imenissemmeemea V *"For`.'City of.Renton Use*4 :.1 CERTIFICATION OF:MAILING 1, �..„° +,► , here• by certify that notices of the proposed application were marled to; :':... " tCrtyEmployee):: >v:::::<:;.>;.:>:.: >:»::>:>:::::::>>:;::.r::>[::>::.: each listed property owneron +el .m Signed - iC. '' . Date ' '` :> :; .; NOTARY ATTEST Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary:Public,;`in and>for the State of Washington'° residing at ?: t, �g-, t (.,,J ;on the da of listprop.doc �f � REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 • S NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: April 21,1998 A Master Application has been riled and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. �A4VI 11ty NWy.M'tc% PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-062,SA-A,EC DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a three story,88 unit motel with a building footprint of 16,082 s.f. and a total building area of 46,937 s.f. The proposal Includes 82 parking spaces on-site and 8 additional spaces on an adjacent properly. Primary access Is via a driveway off East Valley Highway,with an emergency access connecting to the drive an adjacent property to the south.Panther Creek runs along the south boundary of the property In a man-made channel.The proposed building maintains the required 25'setback from the creek. GENERAL LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Hwy STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Drainage Report Geolechnical Report Stream Buffer Revegetation Plan PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on June 8,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact Peter Rosen at(425)235.2710 Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPUCATION: • April 17,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: April 21,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLIC{ATTI�ON: April 21,1998 q�wp. i _ ...• `7 1 101 a a L 1 e ..( oa0aTaE • ) • • l�l � GENIMLOTAOC '. •• CERTIFICATION I, Sah cL Ij , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Avy •I°‘cI`a Signed: S&Vlc AAV ..A nMk\ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and ror the State of Washington residing , on the 3f,�C day of /y�� . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 CIT•OF RENTON NA 1, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 21, 1998 Mike Cohen MC Construction 2142 Abernathy Road NE Olympia, WA 98506 SUBJECT: East Valley Highway Motel LUA98-062,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Cohen: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 19, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Bill and Soo An/Property Owners ACCPTLTR DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 1s� f� CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is r lore than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master.X_pplication for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: BILL ANP Soo Ary EAST VALLEY HI-G"r1 WAY I4c7TE1. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 31ZZ. LEEWARD c:.T N►v 3650 EAST VALLEY H26NWf:1Y REIUTON, i.)A c1SOS KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: OLYMPIA ZIP: 98soa 301.30S911%0Z, DEVELOPMENT P LAN TELEPHONE NUMBER: (.360)4566307 EXISTING LAND USE(S): CITY OF REN ONNING urvzmpczoVEo LAND APR 11 1998 APPLICANT (if other :t40: owner) RECEIVED t �/,� f p�� a PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: 1si1Ik- GoldetA of (afr✓ve. eeiel,. ; MOTEL- COMPANY (if applicable): (\4e Cjl.Vi tie` itC "1Z yl EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ErmPLorrnErv; AREA -VALLEY (EAJ) ADDRESS: ZIg2 Akev v\at11 NA NC PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: 6 ) j 1 (9 EXISTING ZONING: ARTERIAL. C.ommERcsRL TELEPHONE NUMBER: (2,260) LJ LJ 1:)_ („/a 'v�f- r ��// PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: it ZKE. CONEN OR. STEVE YESTER. COMPANY (if epolicable). PROJECT VALUE: AU- c.OruSnb.(rsON * a—3 MILLION ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 2.I4Z A6ERNATN1 RO NE CITY: Ct-yrY1PIA ZIP: Y4ecc C IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: C.LAS5 3 WETLAND (PRNMER. CREEK) 1 (3b0) 4S(, L 307 e' ' LEGAL DESCRIPT'N •OF PROPERTY (Attach separaWheet if necessary) ' 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION &FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. — ANNE>CATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ — LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $�'aG'y _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ _ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION— MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge _1_ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ ,-'— _ REVISION $ — AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) STEM✓ y4 STEk , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and 5 iE&F )' SsEQ for the State of YUGeihei tairesiding at 7 2=j F- v-ry ,+ t ' (Name f Owner/Representative) , on the ,f-In day of " I) i 94g. ,X �, � (Signature of Owner/Representative) j„.,,,„ , ature of Notary /ublic) v ""�� �,(This section to be completed by City Staff.) f=-~. City File Number. Z1 .,. <. .A AAD BSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H LC(" U A �,MHP FPUD FP PP R RVMP -A SAH SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME TP V-A V B V�!-H W TOTAL FEES S. f,�'' "°""" TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $_ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 /fT-` ' 3� - l � ca=�=�✓F=���:,_=r..=���-�=�^S-s --a�—Sss=3-"—:za:zs�-tr-=os��aa_._+_ c��c►-_—._--__._••-_• M .OSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE 4 • KING COUNTY EXPANDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION =-==_y__==a=__ Site Address :3650 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Parcel# :3a==a 9118 STR 302305 TAXLOT 118 LOT 3 CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 014-81 RECORDING NO 8105209001 SD PLAT DAF - POR SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 - BAAP ON N/S C/L SD SUED WCH IS 250 FT N OF S 1/4 COR TH N 89-06-03 E 275 FT M/L TO WLY LN PRIMARY A�G HwY SD NNO LNSTO�iSDLY C/LLG THSD SLYLTOY LPOB LESS POR N LN SD SW 1/4 OP SE 1/4 TH LN WITHIN 92ND AVE SE EAST VALLEY RD LESS N 446 . 71 FT AS MEAS ALG W THE S LN IS PLW N LN -x .. .a=....__ The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. r MC Construction Consultants 2142 Abernathy Rd. NE Olympia, WA 98516 (360) 456-6307 Fax 923-9763 April 1, 1998 To: The City of Renton RE: East Valley Highway Motel 3650 East Valley Highway Renton,WA 98055 We,Bill An and Soo An,hereby attest that we are the owners of the property for this property and authorize Mike Cohen and/or Steve Yester of MC Construction to act in all respects as our appointed representatives with regards to the permitting process for the proposed project. Sign , Bill An Soo An ..s „s»»E�, ATTEST: Subscribed and signed before me,a `°• �rAC``. _� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, , .`. residing at Olympia,on the lst day of April, 1998. s.,, _yr, .y, •f jt�kr.2- s :ix • 6 er .' sue'•. - /j ./'�.�/Y�1/l �e V/t�"� 5I y41iwr,.r.140N. i: , 1 • MC Construction Consultants 2142 Abernathy Rd. NE Olympia, WA 98516 (360) 456-6307 Fax 923-9763 March 26, 1998 City of Renton Current Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 REGARDING: Proposed East Valley Highway Motel, Site Plan Submittal PROJECT NARRATIVE Please find herewith our submittal for Site Plan Approval of our proposed East Valley Highway Motel at 3650 East Valley Highway,King County Assessor's Account Number 302305911802. The parcel has a site area of 76,022 square feet and is currently unimproved land with no indication of any previous use. The parcel is generally flat. Panther Creek was relocated onto this property and runs along the Southern property boundary in a man-made channel. The required 25 foot setback from the creek will be maintained in locating the building. We are proposing the construction of a 46,937 square foot motel on this site. The footprint of this three-story building would occupy 16,082 square feet with another 28,319 square feet of impervious surface containing driveways,parking and walkways. The remaining 31,621 square feet(42%)would be landscaped per a plan designating areas of planting,undisturbed natural vegetation and enhanced natural vegetation. The motel would contain a total of 88 guest units along with office facilities,an indoor pool and recreation area,and conference room. Our plan provides for a total of 82 parking spaces which include 4 handicap,27 compact,and 51 standard size spaces. An additional 8 spaces are available at the adjoining and connected Nendel's parking lot(these spaces are in excess of Nendel's required available parking spaces)per a cross parking agreement,copies of which are included with this submittal. This connecting driveway will also serve as the emergency vehicle turnaround. The primary access for our project will be a 20-foot driveway to the East Valley Highway at the Northwestern corner of the property. Si rely, i Site ter MC Construction , ;G (360)456-6307 �-t F1.�'v�,: APR g G �1�a oa MC Construction Consultants 2142 Abernathy Rd. NE Olympia, WA 98516 (360) 456-6307 Fax 923-9763 March 26, 1998 City of Renton Current Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 REGARDING: Proposed East Valley Highway Motel—Construction Mitigation Description We propose to complete this project within approximately 7 months of receiving a building permit from the City of Renton. Construction will be limited to hours of daylight. It is anticipated that the majority of construction vehicles and hauling will follow State Route 167 and East Valley Highway to the site. All efforts to minimize the impact of this construction on surrounding properties and vehicular travel in the vicinity will be taken. No significant unavoidable impacts are anticipated. Sincerely, Steve Yester MC Construction ,� pEVELOPZl�ERENl-pN Can Lir 199� PR °) r , [ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST P JRPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Tt e State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation rof an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary de,ays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark de!,ignations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can as:ist you. Th checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your prc posal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be sig iificant adverse impact. UE E-0F CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apf ly." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in "project," " pp "property as "proposal," the checklist to the words "applicant," andor site should be read "prc poser," and "affected geographic area," respectively. t}+`� ' N D�C` crt o R1.11.0 01 Rec°\15) En+ironmental Checklist A BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EAST VALLE1 Ka:A+wt-Y MarEL 2. Name of applicant: S .LL AND Soo RN o/o MC. (.ONSTiLUL1 tt - rraxe COHEN ort 5-1-E46 YESiSa. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2.14Z ABERNATHY RO NE arm-LA, wA 1f1506 (360)'IS6-6307 4. Date checklist prepared: q F PQtL 8, 1`I`/$ 5. Agency requesting checklist: gsSoc2RTE9 WtTN 5TTE PLAN P?4p)At., 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ComPLETxoN =N 5PIjpJb of 1999 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No PLANS AT TAMS TU4E 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Gee-rEcKNx.cx, REPc44c S 43 rT¢D AIREw .T14 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N0, WE PO NCSt 1(. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. NONE KNOWN 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. CoNSTTt CTZON of R Tr+REE-STo2Y , tf8 LANIT NoT'EL OF yb,437 SQ. FT ON 'PHIS 77,LAIS SQ. T. LOT' 2 Environmental Checklist 1 ?. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 36 - EAST VALLEY KU,N A 1 V KENTON, WA ggoSS 'PARCEL # : 3csz3ac91tg E. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one 41210 oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) ?NE STEEPEST SLOPE IS LONFtNEO TO 'TNE c.REck< t3ANKS WMZCN P . HPPROXmmATELY 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. SAND, SILT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. '('HERE. 15 NO tNV1CATLON OF NNsTRBLE SOILS xN THE �t1C�N=Ty, e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. cN-•?ITE Scnt-S WILL- eE I.SEP TO t61-14JC4 CATS A010 F ILLS . THEeEFokk. ,No 'LMPofcT OF tvifrifiZIALS SS Anl"TIcieATEo. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NOT LIKELY wt.TN APPROPRIATE, ER.OSSDN (1uNTa0L•S 2N I'LP+c,E. PRIOR "To CONSTRLILTIO/0. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? FIPPROYVAATELY S$% • Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: FS,erea FARR=c FENCE WLl.L es. 14$E0 t11,01v6 W11R- OTHER REavatEfrEkrrt AS ARE P OVIOER. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. (MT MAY QE POW P ONQRZN(,T WE CANSTRCAcr'toro PI-VISE oR T1.1E PRcSEct- b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No, TNE2C ARE Nom C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: C.ornPLY wtTH hocAL, STFrrE., AND FEEERAG Emr 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. PAMi►tE2 cRfE< wq5 REWcartED onrfo THIS PRoPEtrry DNRRINLTNE aVELoPmEa PP St4RRoHNDLN(, PRaPERTLES 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. YES, fBNt THE REQUIRED Z5 Fool €NFFRZ To THE Cit.&ZI.DTNv wI. .C. (3E MATNTHTNIeD. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ',THE SURFALE WATERS Ant() 1...)E11.A00 tON- tn/EP W'ITHIn1 THE CHANNEL w1l.L. NoT 8E AFFECTED. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. tvi. 4 En ironmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. SroVv WWEE WYLL BE CONTALNEO, TeErTTEP AND RELEASE WILL BE mET[KEP INTG ((<ECK. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No WASTE. MATERIAL. WILL 4E DISCHAR. .D TNT° THE GQOUND F2OIA ANY SouQcG, C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. STORM wATC2 L.._ l3C REt-EASED CIQ A thETt2ED EASLS AFTER-. On} ATE RETENSICt✓ AND TREATwtENT" INro FraNTN[r. c.REEI<- 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: mistREO �'EtA f-M. r\cTER TREAIW\ENT WILL Cc'rvTROL. 11Y11,Acis. No moi.c whTE2 Will 2E RdE 'SEU AT AN7 (I)EN TLtY\: imp SS CtARRENTLY FLowilu, SIJTQ 4 PLANTS Tr F_ a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs -7 grass pasture crop or grain f wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 'ME Slit wtu. &. CLEAPEO AND GR.98E0 AS NECt$'f To LNYrcL .. t^T'xL=ZIESr CcJ.YrRucT chkictnro WALKS ANO STRuLItARE. tkozl'ER FOR. CREEK WILL BE tANALTERLP IMPROVED AuuoR.Dlnx,TO AtJ ENMAN(Efilids.tr PLAN. 5 Environmental Checklist C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNwwN. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: VAN OSCA PING PE,R CSTY REGi KIRCMFNIS ►.A.t-t- DE.ZN MIN LIED 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbirds other Mammals: deer bear, elk, •-- -r, other Fish: bass, salmo trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. SAt MON (Co Ro� c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain MOST LLKEL-1,FOR 61)1-M0r' d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 25r BNFER vviLL BE ME 5LABTECT CFa A Hn ITAT/VE(,ETATIVE. PRAU:TTON AND ENH f1NIEMENT ?U J 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. GAs AND EL£CTR . FOR, MOTEL usEE b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NOT 1.LCELr. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: BLkrLOi.NG To MEET ALL PRESENT STATE AND LOWS ENEk(,Y CONSE21111TLCN RE QWS RIP(\ NTS 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH •, 6 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NOS THERE IS NOT. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. i'r1E RE SHOULD BE NONE REQNIQEp. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONc PROPOSED. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE SKONW AFFEct iNTs P1Z.OSEc T 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. GONSTRNCTIOIV NOISE. IN THE SNORT TERM 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: r-ronsT coNSttZUmoN io DAI -z6NT NouRS oNl y, 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 'THE SSTE ZS Lt.ARRENT1.4 VRcANS, b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT IN RESENT HS'ToEY, c. Describe any structures on the site. No STRULTtAR.ES EXIST CA) SITE . d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NC . e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ,AKTIERIAL c.icionNERLTAL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? E_MP Loy m€rvJ PIKER VAU,(y 7 Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NOT KNOWk) h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, • specify. C.t-Ass 3 weT LAND (.PHWTER O £EK� i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? g8 GkAEsT Rooms, '1-6 elneLOYE€S on) srgFF, j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NINE NEEDED, I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Oct)Etoem AND uosTet"LTtC t'W JS wst.t. WOOLY wzrtl Czzy KEQUIREVIEOVI. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. StoRr-tERM GµEsr AccoeitOQP1tUJS oNVy b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NCtvE E. US.REO 10. AESTHETICS — a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No VIEt i wit,t. BE ALTERED oft_ oBSTRUC1E.P c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: INSTALL LANOSCAP1.tu6 To covVipty t.)i?Fm CSzy REG 4 czEmpuys 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? L*GNTS FROM EoohnS, STREET atkiTS 1N0 VE N3.Ct.,E NERPt.I6HTS, THESE WOtALD trIRI.NO otCOR AT NL(NT. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Nor LtKEL�I. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NoNE SHCNLO AFFECT THIS PRDSELT , d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE PRDPoSED, 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE 10 THE VE )' NEAR. VIC..LN'LTV. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N0l tr WLCI. NOT. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NONE PROPOSEQ, 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NOT lb OW- ►.NCv.i1-EDGE. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. IJCNE KNowN. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE YPCK,SED. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. THE PRoTE[.T wLu. I CcESS tEkECTI.1 WTo 'THE EAST UAI.LEf ItS/NWWy. 9 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? (�. IJT %ItJ OiA AMP Kai. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? THE PR03F wout.0 NAVE $L C1rV si7E PAQKTNb SPACE WO ACCESS TO ANOTt1ER ce aJ 'AD Ac,Ef T Pc oPi: TY AND E f'X )E. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or.improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether,public or private? i)O, Lr wcLL NOT. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate .vicinity of) water,::rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 79 VEND-tILAR Te1PS ?EQ. Ph)' Af2E P.m ioNEP wLni PEAK Vot,uwtCS OCCu?Itu(, IN THE EVENING AND (.ATE OR ELVV(,. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE PROP05Ep. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO / WO-Lf`LONAt_ ANtS[ZPA1tp TO SER.v:CCE 1HE MOICCTs b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE PuoPO5EO pt' THtS TIIV►E. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricity atural go , water cit3 service, ephon ,sanitary s ewe ewe rseptic system, other. 10 • Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. FO vEct= rw,E-T scvr.JO ENE.cc,y WATER. city of RENT PO GAS: P,AbET sCA.tNV ENES-(.1 (ZEF'ISE.' PHONE: us WEST SEv)Ca.: W'I cc c.EN'rco C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in r- iance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fu f sclosure on my part. Proponent: . Jail _ AP.• r.'I►! - _ 0/S41' Name Printed: Illt - SWIM Date: gi(0198 11 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving j decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether It would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 12 Envirdnmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: REVISED 9/94 13 • •l.lil UI 'UUhLV11 1.Nr1.. , -,. .. _.. . . Cnsi YRI�-Eli HLLNtr'�� ��TEL OWNERS cE�TZFl�HTE GEVOK)P C fUiENT P c� TZt�E INS�t�AN�E TO ITY OF REN rN Vi,yG APR 1 7 1998 RECEIVED • AND OTHER CT. bV ''HE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND SUBJECT TO THE F'URTHEREXCIUSIONgAND OTHER pRdVI,3IONS OF THE CONDITIONSA AND STIPULATIONS HERETO MADE A PART THATTNO$GUARANrEE IS GIVJN NOR LIABILIT IN Y ASSUMED TTITH SHOWN LIMITATION IDN OF ANY PARTY NAMED OR REFERRED OO OF SCHEDULE E A OR WITH TO THE IDENTITY LEGAL EFFECT OR RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, THEREIN. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, heroin called the Company GUARANTEES named in Schedule A against actual monetary logs oichor damage exe ., the Assured gthe liability amountstated in Schedule shall l sustain eon ofy incorrectnege in the assurances set fortl, shall sueGein by reason in Schedule A. JL'IVI ISI::ISURIL"Ii t.i)y '1 11i: COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE$INSURANCE CO. 4�450 NE 29 BELLEVUE, WA 980073697 COUNTERSIGNED; EUitzEN ESCRDW 116 SOUTHWEST 153RD SEATTLE, WA 981662386 By: _ 4 -'�� 5 Attn: RAY (2/2) O (206 CINDY NICKLE - (206 646-3�i16 FAX SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee � Liability: $].5U . . .; Order No. E791416 Premium: Customer Nc . 24048 Tax : 14 )Y Total : $1r2 BILL C. A.N AND SOO K. AN, 1 . husband and wife Name c f Asguxed : who acquired title by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under ring County ordin No. 9712021281 2 Date c,f Guarantee : MARCH 18 , 1998 THE A SSgRMICES REFERRED TO ON THE PACE PAGE HEREOF ARE : recording laws, That according to those public matt�xssagtectingunder �.tleYlta the following desGxibedns�and�tive notice of See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION: " uaarstae i t to or interest in the land which is covered by this g f. The _s a Fee s.-mplQ in the land is ,testeiA r or interest d Title to t'1e e�tata wfired title by AN AND S00 K. AN, husband and wife whohouacYRecdrtit1 No . BILL :. Deed recorded under ring Statu`�ory warranty shown L g712oZthe1Sxceptions shown below, which are not necessarily subject tot priority. order of their p 11cnv by the authority that levies taxes or assessments c. 1 . re Taxes or assessments which are not shown as cx at ng records by the public records . land or by � in reservations or eXcep �ohs i "•- '= 2 . (a) is oreineA mining ola►imer (b) to, (c) Indian or 8 in Acts authorizing thbuCsnotnlimitedeo� f ( e Patents rights, including, claims or title sr.r-rywa or aboriginal rtg water rights1 ex ) whether or servitudes; oro (d) er not the matters excepted under (a) , (b) , G.':• shownpublic records . shown by the � btlV l ll 1 •ISU \10 t JWWW i ii:4 , r,er�r- , IU HIJK1L`H e� i.LU . . Order No . '17; ; EXCEPTION6 desc�� Title to any property beyond the lines of the land expres or slywdeerti: , 3 , lanes, and abuts, or the right to maintain vaults, tunnels, herein, or title to streets, roads► avenues, rn ps or anydother structure or improvement/ or any rights r ramps or any rights or easements are aaseml+sntr5 therein unless such property ee1;sl and specifically set forth in the land described herein. ..xp�- Y tocrether with interest, penalty and q . GENERAL TAXES, as follows, ` statu :ory foreclosure costs, if 2nd hale delinquent ig any, after delinquency: elingt on November 1 (let za],£ delinquent on May Allcou No . Year Billed Paid $8 , 444 . 85 302305-9118-02 1998 $8 ► 044 . 05 $0 . 00 Levy :lode : 2110 Assessed Value Land: $609, 300 . 000 . 00 Assessed Value Improvement : $ DRAINAGE DISTRICT TAXES for the year 1998 . Paid Bal Balance Billed $40 . 8 $0 . 00 $40 . 80 CONSERVATION TAX CHARGES for the year 1998 . Paid Balance Billed $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5 . 00 RELINQUISHMENT of ALL, EXISTING, FUTURE ORt 'Oo NTIAL EASEMENTS SEMENTSSsfa d` 5, aoaebr egress -and. regres, light ,o, fromview and air, and hW&Ye;� regress to, azyd between the 1�'n6 YOCeediri�sgunder King be ccrio�rCOurt ,on lands condemned by p Superior state of Washington Sy:Cause No . : 5eza33 6 . EAgEhENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: & Light Compan;� Grantee : Puget Sound Power Electric transmission line Area Affected:e The description contained therein is f sufficient to determine itexact location within the property hein deeleribed , 1,103039 � ' Recording No. : I Li VLIYI 1.1 'UUI�1L1, LJvhv., 1i",u s. cite 70 1.'.,..h.) anal' cUrir LI IL I h ? . Order Na. H7914 `. Ac;EPTI4N5 7 . EASEMEITT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF! Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Granter : Electric transmission line Pur ! Easterly 10 feet Areaa A.£eGted : 6414758 Recording No. : B . EASEME'' T AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : City of Renton h drante and water Grantee' Water main, fire X urpa�� : meters lion contained therein i The deaorip Area Affected: sufficient to determiits exarein location within the property described May 17 , 197 92 6n and d 0December 29 , 39$0 R Recrd 760S170 Recoordinng No. : 1 RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS t?�, 9 . ALL OTHER S RVITU S,CO it anyy, d1sclosed by Shoat Plat ON . 0EASEM reS 0': under SERVITUDES, Recording No. 8105209001 • under King County ENEFTTS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY DE D ISCLOSEDE BOUNDABY THE Rsco sn DOCt]ME`,NT (S) ABOVE RIGHT! E AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE SCHEDULE A. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF 10 . City of Renton Grant Puxpoi�e :urpose : Public utilit:i,as with z�4asseflrY d purtonances Strip of landr1Snoo feet in widthat.4 Area Affected: aiscloued October 31 , 1986 Reaoried� 8610311869 Recor sing No. : AGREE'4ENT AND TIIE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : 11 . October30 , 1989 Revaxieds NO. : 8A10300arkin and landec�pe ma:irtenar.. Ragariing Cross p Reg�r�ing: • were not pro'ridcd with an acp F ,of liabilityat the time this Guarantac wan rcyp iced, Please e of revort . amount shown hereindmamount iyrrekqui gde willle e contactf an o your liabilityAn additions amount be i yur the evente Ofancin applied in an increased liability requested. BSK/c 5g . , twCl'1L.Ih k IU bUlttLll .StIJ I .lS i�hUlt 1L-IJ t�lrll��'1 1;:� Order No. H7914 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 81, Lot 3, as delineated on City of Renton Shor05P0a00 No. b p1a014- a recorded under King County Recording No. portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , in King County, Washington. ' SCHEDULE A �y Policy No. : N780G'/ punt of :�ncuzance= $ 677180. 00 Premiums $ 1539.00 Date of Policy: SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 AT 10: 22 A.M. 1. Name of Insured: BILL C. AN AND BOO X. AN, hurband and wife The d interest in the 1.and :QAn is at Date of Policy artio`�ribad herein and which 1 r 2• covered by this policy it fee simple in: THE NAE ED INSURED policy is Situated in the static of 3. The land of Cr�tytoofiXINiand described as follows: Washington, SEE AT 'AC'NED EXHIBIT "A-1" countersigned u or Za car or qe EXHIBIT "A-1" p14-8 1. ;. of Ranton Short Plat No. O14 rot recor► a• ndlrnaatgdCauntyn tRSaording No. in �h �rt�r of t1�• aouth�aat Ru portio�d under Kiri vat qu gangue 5 Seott w.0t �ortion of tTO slip 23 North, sotion �4► �O� Washington; END OF EXHIBIT ~A-I" Po y NQ. : fl78O6 /: SCHEDULg EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the CoMppacty wi not pay coats, attorneys' fees or expenses) by reason of the tol.l.owin<1 STANDARD E;CCEPTYONS 1. TaXss or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority tii. levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the ub1i.e: records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in t�.r,r�: assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not show!. 1. the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but 'which could be ascertained by an inspection o;' the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or olaiaing to be in possession, thereof. 3 . Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey Of area, would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any ;aen, or right to a lien, for labor, material services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or unda'� Woroaans' compensation Acts, not disclosed by the public records. O. (a) t7npatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (o) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights including, but not limited to easements or equitable servitudes; or (d) water rights, oiaimri title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a) , (0) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Rights of use, control or regulation by the United States of Anon . in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition car limitation on the use, ocau once or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to u,4.:. any waters which may cover the lend or to use any portion of th+' lend which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, conneotjon, maintenance or construct charges for sewer, water electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless dlsoloaed as an existing lie, the public records. poia.Oy No. t x7fio6) ,. SPECIAL EXCEPT/OHS penalty and together with interest, pan TAXES, as follows, i! anY► apex delinquency: Nuvem3�F�' ; statutory 0 yf costs, nd half after delinquentdequ 1' ntatu foreclosure eon May 11 3 Balance (1et halffilled Paid TeX �,� N-,s.;, Y""�ar �.--- 17, 162 . 11 1997 $54 ,304 .22 $27 , 152 . 11 30Z305-9117"d� 2110 Levy Code* i100.00 Assessed Value Land: $3 g663 ,100.00 Assessed Value Improvement: $rovement: Y997 • DAAIrg DISTRICT TAXES for the year Paid Balt� Ca Bill�� $�,7 . 48 $34.95 $17 . 47 g; tVATION TAX CHARGES for the year 1997 . CON Bele;noa Paid Billed 80. 6z $0.63 $1. zs 2. A86S8t AMOUNT: $14 + 86. 87 ORIGINAL INTER 65 TROVI T puY13 , 1984 1NAL INBIALIN 15 INSTALLMENTS PAID ' INSTALLMENTD] LXNGUSNrt August t 12 , 1998 8 • IN8 L NTZLINVENTs 0 LEW:b0 BY: cityof Renton FQR Roe ► sewer and water 14 L.I .D. NO. : 31 FARM NO. t 3 . ,7RANDDH or LEASE: Group, a Waet�S, , ,. Banyan InvestmentHarman M. LESSOR: en d Partnership general .pa r i. •. AlAllonbaoh, managingnfl Dixie :�,`` Charles R. Kearns► Larry L• g L. 1,'a:►,;. . I eSS t y. husband Gloria isan Mil ► r, husband and and Olariw Baer ,n9 C; wife, and Phillip L. dirst arst and arr6 n sband Carla b• Gerstner, Not di0O1198 RECORDING d RE( OR: June 11, OIRDSD= N0. t 8506110874 S� Po] y No. : H7ao67': Lessor' s interest in the lease was assigned by instrument. Assigns.: Bill C. An and Soo g. An, husband dn . wife Recording No. ; 9709260716 8UBORDIHATYON AGM:KENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY AGREEMENT DATED; August 121 1988 RECORDED: August 15, 1988 RECORDING NO. : 8808150963 The lussas'a interant in said lease -was made subordinate to the I {- of Tr+ast recorded under Recording No. 8906130060, set forth at paragraph 6 herein. 4 . LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LEBACR: Territorial Inns dim Monarch Motor. a :: LgSBLE: Atkinson Washer Service Inc. FOR I. TERM Opt 3 years with additional 1 year t:&111: periods DATED: March 25, 1986 RECORDED: September 18, 1986 RECORDINQ NO. : S609100625 5. LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: Pad America - Nende1s Inn/Renton LESSEE: ATCON Services, Inc. FOR A TERN OF: 3 years with option to renew DATED, April 28, 1994 RECORDED; July 27 , 1994 RECORDING NO. : 9407270144 said instrument supersedes and replaces' Instrument raaorc!ed under Kith County Recording No. 8906090070. pol,cY Na. : 0780672 p THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: a wauhiYiyt:i>: 6. Grantor: OP T UBT putt, Grou ► Banyan Ynvestm Partnership, a managing Limited Partner axe r�. prant�ar: general partner of Which hais Han n , 1.nbavh1 Charles R. wifal and �D L. )(earns, husband ifeger, Bassinger and Gloria Bas Philip L. husband and ~Carla D. Gerstner, Gerstner and company husband and wigs o =rieurance comp Transamerica T tl corporation Trustee' a California editvarP prig;.folax`Yount: $2, Q, 000. 00 Dated: Am July 1988 Dated: A.ugUet 15, 1988 R0Oo;;dadt 8808150960 Reoording No. : ppresent balance owp .; by contacting anon should be �atet7.,ander aq°ncy/individual. 4 � onteotinq the approP p.9BIGNRENT OW DEED or TRUST: united Nationalstatbanking ass is ion ore `. Aes�qne«: a national1g53 loAbar 15� Recorded: DsaeA312152SA2 Recording No. : RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: 7 Charles R. Kearns and Dixi.egLa T � Ke ASSIGNOR: and Wife, �rxiva�battd and L.and Gloria Bassiflg 'L. Gerstner r and ca: D. G and Phr, husband and wife D. o•rstnaY, h U.S. pcoditcarp 1�DATED: July 15, 191888 RECORD August , RECORDED: 8808150961_ - ' rt:n�iY �hY'ni�1iTTii'i a i Allenbaoh, general rim Personalty on the premises August 15, 1p88 Reoorsg agb8sa0183 Recording No. : Recording Policy No. 1 H;780672 THEREOF: 'TERMS AND CONDITIONS THERE Larry. I. Grano TRUST AND Kearns► Dixie L. Kearns►p 1 . t.� 9' C.R. er, 010rie Bensinger, Phil Grantor: L. O.rs er and C. Dian+ L. 4er�rCTitle Company of Snohomish tner Stewart it Trurte8t County,k 0. Lockhart and Rosemarypa senefiaiarY•= Lockhart is ��o d.oa 1P00 DatedtOriginal amount: May lees metedt Hay l8► ss 8805181Z'�0 Recorded'c No. : the present balance owF.a Inve Izig made to determinein iesent • should be a enoY/ Iy co t1ating theth appropriate lender CONDITTidual. by co�'taating SUHORIN1�1'1'ION AGREEMENT AND THE TERNS AND August 18 ► 19a8 GATED: 4t 19 , 1968 8Y RECORDED: ktguet01 RECOPDIH NO. tTrust roe° RBCp�D�NO a Deed of hoxe�r,. 6 d or Trust was mad50960, set forth at paragraph under Iee ordiri� Ho. g8081 thati m��'etm�=rid ThisR amefda and superseder Recording No. e808150964� . This ded under Kin agreement t reob;Gded under RinSiountY Leasehold interest AFFEr'TS t OF DEED OF TRUST; .. S. 1t�im�srt' A8SY4T Lemons Charitable Trust Are►i gne�t Trustee tit , ].994 February Revnrd�t Recording No. ' 940118016023 of vendors and holders �yi if any; rig installed nd h said leaseholds,o property trade fixtures at the 10• Unr perty'diand rights on persona. p reo�rity and rightr o tenants to remove property' ro ertYY 1 ZAL EASEMENTS r ` . expiration of the term. 4R POTENTIAL egress y��r.; zxi TINO, rights of ingress, highway MENT or ALL ¢ and all rigid sn or xi. AaLxS light, o, f view and wee the land the highway King Caa,�k.:: ao��a iq from and lands condemned proceedings reti�revr tO' on lands condemned by be constructed• gv�ierior State of Washington 582233 Cause No. 1 Pol. f No. : H780672 12. EAMENT ND'THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Puget Sound Power ` Light Company Purpoel: Elactric transmiaaion line area Affected: The description contained therein IL not sufficient to determine 3tg exv; location within the property herein; described Recording No. : 1103039 13. ZASEMiNT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Municipality of Metropolitan Sett'...:: Purpose: Electric transmission line Area effected: Easaterly 10 feat Recorling No. : 6414758 14. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: City of REnton Purpose: Water main, fire hydrants and wAtf•,.. meters Area Affected: The description contained therein not sufficient to determine its exet;c location within the property herein described Recorded; May 17, 1976 and December 29, 1980 Recording No. : 7605170692 and 8012290361 16. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Greer tee: Banyan Investment Group, a Waehx;n c Limited Partnership; and Kendrick P. Mercer, P.O. , en Oregon corporation. as Trustee; beneficiary of Deed at TrUst Purpose: To construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmisei:NA and/or distribution cystem upon tiffs:: under the right of way, together '44 ' all nacaocary or convenient appurtenances therefor Area Affected: 10 feet in width having 5 feet of 'v width on each side of a centerline described ce follows: The osnterl ii, of grantee's facilities as oanotruo or to be constructed, extended or relocated within the south 70 feet: Reworded: November 4, 1985 Recording No. : 8611040575 . Policy No. : H7gn6'i^ + NdITI0N9 'Y'HgRgOO• d public utilit.ieG AND Tat TES AND Purp 6. g!►SE��' Y�casr�h�°�ao� nder K1�9 Ooux��� DLPC 0 0d by mont recorded u Affects: Recording No. $609250679 �iralored bY� L t N T ) AND CONDITIONS TN8REO gAe��'r ANC City of Renton ®scary ? ' City utilities s with necessary crsnte�p� tact by �p fit o�;r. appurtenances disclosed �.a Affected: Strip of lend 16fes am the easterly portion Area l�E�ected= therein 1 1966 Recrd end g Recording No. :e 8610311870 CONDITIONS TN��f t 8. ffi71s� T AND THE T8a City of Renton with necessary 3 public utilities Pur Grantee= apprtenano.s p feet in w3,dt.i1 a�3 Are a�af Stripof land 15.0 discosed therein Area affected:� Ootob«X 31, 8610311069 Recorded: No. � CONDITIONS TOM?, Recording at d n9 THE VOWS AND i4. �'QRa� f AND October 301 19 6 9 go gtobe0874 And landscape co,�dad: o Cross parking gaCo'rdlriq No. * Riq�►rdinq= maintenance END or SCHEDULE B PoJ y No. : H7:06 / INSURANCE COMPANY 4P PKYLADELPHYA COt��oN��T� LAND ON AND IS IN NO WAY ON�q�L'�'�`. r O NECTIP I R PONONYZ' 1L►NTHATITLEO NsuPAN C� COMPLY OR A COMPA TEI �ac�;sn WITH coQoM ��y► w�sHiNo TITLE COMPANYOF PIERCE 1 1 .1:,§fi -P-0 _".; -1- /f r p„e V.3 7 »a�vt9 r^777 7° a ta3 •(n, 77°M• P"° ` var.,' roorawq 77s'ItM7°1 pre j 301 70 ram 6rri '1 140'097°1 Tv 3169Y '71033a3N1 'non adrmrr) prs•� h0» i 'n. 210,ti6nj1 o m'Ap Ilrmra! do 1° n?1 araq J�^7T�• aq7 av"7117 wiw 1 ra7yd»??� wn �J9,,Mrrat a1J II padaTIA7p Ti wpFwt17 Fry, rpn/;moo 1 701 'SY3131N rsn++wy iT�D'` T7ra a .F7.yad� Tsar pp, roe" 7a7ou • pre �vrw°fl pro /j1011/0S1 ) 71V papb0 1 ,7 02 Pry wrray) tomb; 'T • aw"C pay/born/ aM 6r'pvo)p porlpP*'Y 117x.ia1°l ye l vnl 1innirmy •SY333NA a r! Yowl paQrranp awoq� j 7 )°1. .•i )01. r1 07 proofs' rrarmr�ap9oarliI Z )o pww qi )01. " rp 07 6r!Ipro.),),'no r)11 10 re p4 r`•f '1001015011 • pa 30 a rwn •F7r"om 4.11 '"o7rA1 10 h rl viper paF*0aty pro 'M°) r'"7°1 v'ArruOJ�6 rpys7sl '11-►10 '0N Mu v N7 a7 wo16'�M� , • 'Arsenal r? k7yadOrd 7�' je wipe a'R wPArPP •SY313FM 6r+I Y'1 17 inola pig, yar7na9 '1 dr7+•f1 P� ' •a?p, pre vvq,vv1.»eryrrsp ann rn°79 pww ir►rrs9 10 P1 Marl ;air fat?. pvv °M 'yy373iM P4 M'I rxvsa7r '1 rs7' 7 • pry ppd yr rr.n 'pry r""l GJ va' 7na"a "ar6n0 tn?fl P'n yo)oM Y7vi1 M 'worm iRnlr #, »r7 7yyara6) »6➢"s" rr►a,4hntnliroll 'SY31131M O Yaw)•yvd parley; "n76r!+I�M • r! dwolo pre ,orq 'tr>r°i O 'MV^O 6I rime, Flyadovd 10 7uo. 'r°tOwf`IsWI erred PM7 07 it D Tar F)tiv1*nrT"sd adv3vpr*) pry 6rtdo,rp'�7 pry irriorsr 1j ygt11I1Y 11 I58111' . n R �7'•r11 r0)6r10,0 1 »T)rwava+l aq 1TMr P1e ►fYrrlparw°�n.y pm 7'1 1° r"arrod 7n1niroa: pm 1106�i05 Q rr 1 'Breit 3010n I 1M3N33n slAl • tC J pp•T1�"op•z 36/33/r3n731'71► DPI JIMMI 31YJSNrYI 6rtY goix Y1 SSD1 �.1 pt�1� - • � ►160� • '' 3E3 I I I C5Ac. Jack L. I::: .., (Cc-3 `bcFadden ' M EAST VALLEY HW` : � �, MOTEL " �`' is•J 1'. John V. Farrell ►-A .�______--__- I U;% 3650 E. VALLEY HWY h`�`' i 6.14 Ac. ..1 Nakanishi R N Q� R�8 -- -zzxA.J E ToN1 WA fOoss ?co t�3r 6z, s„, ,9 lou \ KSI ,,a .04 f 2 \� ,fib 004 .�i�,� 7 m To SOAL s R-8 '�� �E �S; 8 \E y 5 r;C.63Ac. [34�I �1 G -' N WI � 39-- --131.4-r-- --- tj-. 60 T9i.C3— Q H �• `r' " s1 a" Leland SS' V. __. d w 4 1.32AC S. Wliso o s -- 3504 gZ °�ws7�� a f!iki,,, n Q0 0 L__\,, 1 a L�67AC. 04, W �}•at�� ao 4j \ na\,' al .T 172 Yr IT .. ti I 7E,..„ ,vm 0 3cAc_ rr. 0.34AC '' \ . I IV 49 m a7 /2J ItT • d 0.55Ac 7 N - 21,0S . _;u 1 I .r, (\,till 1 e 3' SSIN °° �'� M go' 1 MI5 -2b71b -r,'..;4./l6 to I -f651L Q a ‘A V = Z TN �'.ice Q 'J- n r THE COOT COMPANY Wetland and Wildlife Consulting Services 416 S. Washington Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 352-9897 FAX(360) 352-9914 DISTURBED BUFFER REVEGETATION PLAN FOR THE BEST WESTERN MOTEL PROPERTY April 1998 prepared for: Mike Cohen DEv'E'-OPMENT PLA M.C. Construction CITY OF RENTG; 2142 Abernathy Rd. NE APR 1 7 1998 Olympia, WA 98506 RECEIVED- prepared by: S. Shanewise Senior Ecologist M. Bennett Ecologist banyAP98.pin CONTENTS Introduction 1 Planting Plan Planting Specifications Maintenance 2 Monitoring Costs 3 Figure 1: Disturbed Buffer Revegetation Plan Figure 2: Typical Planting Plan Tables 1A and 1B: Plant Schedule MAINTENANCE Sprinkler Irrigation Landscape watering should be extended to the revegetated buffer area. Biannual Weed Control Weed control should be conducted in June and September of each year. All overgrowth should be cut back from each installed plant. In addition, any growth of invasive plants (Scot's broom or blackberry) within the mitigation planting area should be removed. MONITORING Plant Installations A qualified wetland biologist will monitor all plant installations. Monitoring will entail single, annual inspections for plant survival and general vigor in July/August for three years following installation. Two permanent photo points will be established within the planting area to help document overall success. A brief letter report with photographs, detailing results of the monitoring, will be submitted to the City of Renton by 1 September of each monitoring year. CONTINGENCY PLAN Plant Mortality If the mortality of installed vegetation exceeds 20% during any annual inspection, the installer will be required to replant all dead specimens. Replanting will be performed using the same specifications details for initial installation. PROJECT NAME 2 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared per the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance to compensate for temporary land clearing disturbance within a reach of the Panther Creek buffer. The subject property is located within the City of Renton immediately west of Highway 167, east of East Valley Highway, and north of Nendel's Motor Inn. Existing buffer habitat conditions are comprised of a nearly monotypic community of reed cannarygrass. The outer ten feet of the 25-foot stream buffer will be cleared for site preparation. Following grading, the disturbed buffer area will be replanted per the specification of this re-vegetation plan. The goal of the project is to enhance a portion of the existing degraded stream buffer with establishment of native shrubs. The enhanced shrub community will provide forage and nesting for some avian species and provide some shading and detritus source to the stream channel. PLANTING PLAN PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS Groundcover Hydroseed A standard upland groundcover hydroseed shall be applied to the entire disturbed buffer area. Hydroseeding will be performed immediately upon completion of the building project. Native Shrub Border A dense border of native shrubs will be installed throughout the disturbed ground. An alternating, repeating pattern will be used to provide some habitat diversity while maintaining an overall uniform appearance. Planting Plans/Schedules A typical planting plant has been developed for a 20-foot section of disturbed ground. A plan view illustration is provided in Figure 2. A plant schedule detailing species, size, type, and cost is given in Tables 1A and 1B. Plant Materials If shrubs are installed between 1 Nov. and 1 Apr. (winter planting), bare root materials should be used. If installation occurs between 1 Apr. and 1 Nov (summer planting), containerized materials should be used. Bare root plants are preferred. Large Planting Hold A 12-inch diameter planting hole will be clearly excavated for each installation. Digging bars and shovels will be used by a 2-person crew to ensure full size holes. Topsoil Supplement Topsoil will be added to the planting hole. Excess soil will be sidecast across the open ground. PROJECT NAME 1 COSTS Irrigation Not Included The calculation below does not include costs for irrigation installation or maintenance. TOTAL MITIGATION PLAN COSTS Plant Materials (See Table 1A/1B): $ 480.00* Installation 2 workers, 8 hours each @ $30/hr 480.00 Maintenance 1 worker, 4 hours @ $30/hr = $120 $120 x twice a year = $ 240 per year $240 x 3 years 720.00 Monitoring: Wetland Biologist, 5 hours @ $55/per hour $275 per year x 3 years 825.00 TOTAL COSTS $ 2,505.00 *Cost given is for containerized plants. If bare root specimens are used, costs will be slightly lower. PROJECT NAME 3 I • - I, ,tY,r:t. s.Y `•I o T'S.i:- . .:.rr•�-,s 3 :".A„:.-P f 4' ; •;iIll "'tee LIR 1 1 : a ,s-w 4.4_.. 7 ..... - 9, Aim a :, .`:':';;--',•:'':'fir`:.:.:�•:.:-•:'.:. ..' ' _` 1 j(; ; ,.1 El CLIP :.;j 1" -`ram"Ma v- - ..r.S,...,t. i a a ...:::&.$:;;;.::.:::::::::':':':":::::::-•f':, i!4;:',..;i1:.:,.:.-:. '•:../...:.-.ii: .r:,-4; e- '-....-7;',.,-'.F.:9!,::-..-":=Vti!jFf I-Vl•:::.: 4 -.aF f s erg- . a' :�_' =.n5�:c,,:-,sE., t't..Fi" ?wa'tivH:.H'.�l Yx } i , - wH`M-<H wj�vfa'rwv . x F`, °12 1 :G _ �' -fir•: I 2' 3a i� rx -i.: ce 2: F`F•r•lfr-f'? ." ? E . . i^• . (f. i. - S' r.•r"".. L .................... CLEARING NOTE: x`m---"_.0 NO EXISTING TREES LOC., ADJACENT TO THIS SITE. WILL BE COMPRISED OF LEGEND: PROPOSEC OF GRASSES. CATCH BASIN ■ STORM DRAINAGE UNE t._.. — •* OWNERS REPRESS' SANITARY SEWER M �� ANHOLE � M.C. CONSTRUCTION SANITARY SEWER UNE 2142 ABERNATHY RD. N SANITARY ITA OLYMPIA, WA. 98506 WATERMAIN CONTACT: CONTOUR MIKE COHEN KEYSTONE WALL CCCO (360) 456-6307 PAVEMENT SWALE '•• -•• STANDARD ASPHALT P.^ EMENT LIMITS OF SITE CLEAR: PROPOSED BEST WESTERN HOTEL SITE DISTURBED BUFFER REVEGETATION PLAN TYPICAL PLANTING PLAN 20 FEET -, U O T 10 FEET 1 O Q 0 LEGEND: =Ocean spray = Service berry =Elderberry =Mockorange FIGURE 2 v A BEST WESTERN HOTEL PROPERTY Table 1A: 1 April - 1 November (Summer) Planting . • PLANT SCHEDULE Common Name Species Size Type Density Number Cost* Total $ SHRUB Service-berry Amelanchier alnifolia 1 gal. container 5 ft. centers 48 2.50 120.00 Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa 1 gal. container 5 ft. centers 48 2.50 120.00 Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor 1 gal. container 5 ft. centers -48 2.50 120.00 Mockorange Philadelphus lewisii 1 gal. container 5 ft. centers 48 2.50 120.00 TOTAL PLANTS 192 $480.00 * All prices approximate. Actual costs may vary. • Table 1B: 1 November - 1 April (Winter) Planting PLANT SCHEDULE Common Name Species Size Type Density Number Cost* Total $ SHRUB Service-berry Amelanchier alnifolia 24-36" bare root 5 ft. centers 48 2.25 $108.00 Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa 24-36" bare root 5 ft. centers 48 2.25 $108.00 Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor 24-36" bare root 5 ft. centers 48 2.25 $108.00 Mockorange Philadelphus lewisii 24-36" bare root 5 ft. centers 48 2.25 $108.00 TOTAL PLANTS 192 $432.00 * All prices approximate. Actual costs may vary. banyAP98.scd ;oh • • A Eris VAL-kV FUCAiWAY MOTEL. (,BOSS PAY KSNL- EASEMENT •f ' OP ow - I. &Sayan Morin ptaats to Nona*m ch a ea,c.ts akepukingo ntNs •( outvotes, eLaxts, 9i idtnU, %tt invitees • o tht peaking spates of Lot 3. Eanyar as ens einemt dot he p Moaakch kene.in pants to IJL. Welts• tts ade L . and otkta oa the peaking apaces o{ Lot i. . invitees .nittex aynet.ePt. establish �ng a Tkt ntes that U pats slay by y µveil fat spteitit Wt.,. of puaWsts amid that be . ked• pourpe ants lamina bovt dueaibed gr ad a kUai x with the �u to beater of aid be banding " n wett ssmu and assigns. O0 ` gamma AUexbnth . •iatt �•iabae is thcm aet {o th;. E NTO N Mac asµa` lavestotxt fouP, a in9F3t�OR oL 1hi poNtAs . own eoi Lot t and Lot S. and as ttasot oc � Lt ; hewAU en both ts kt has autoti.t9 to tatc ate a OPMENT PLANNING Li4lA Ppr1999 p t {oath htxeia. RECEIVED . C • BANYAN Vf5TME1fT t= • C V - a O 1 u .. • tL '1' • t- t ' . . rartnmi0' firi;iiii • v° . i `w)+R oral wvvA Pro Arp vwr Fvvriy, l pvt FIN Fwvw 91,0dvrd pxr Tyro .' v°1 r.., 1»tormawr, Fw, ' YTyOn""' rl"mI1FTrt Fryrsr prr pri • n Fes,-glnraTy0 linFr^ "a vw o 4t '.p" now; UII Oi I flNISf0MJ4103 tt'I NpLDNINS'YA Id 31V1S - . i Y7 M - I` . I yvefr►rrr i y761 •.• r ` A r� • m^r \ . . • 'l •Q1l'yNI y010M KM110011 • a • • .O N N O • O • ST•,TE OF OREGON )us. l� ) CC UNTY OF 11[� before me, the i On this day of �� y commissioned the I antefsIgned,a tuy Public in and for the rate o Oregon, KEARNS and DIXIE L. KEARNS, personally appeared CHARLES R. individuals described in end who ant sworn, wile, ��licnown,to be the a me thatatd signed ho eje;band and wile, to me foregoing instrument and acknowledged to and deed for the trees and I nd se tied s the g instrument as their tree and voluntary \ - sealed said n mentioned' 'Q �`(poses Iced tfte day and year in ttt s 1 go go WITNESS my hand and seal hereto O rKtiflute first above written. O el O NO PUBL in and for the • ri State 1 egon,Residing_-ICC/ My comm /,art r • es • STATE OF OREGON )ns NJ :OUNTY OF Li Ai ) pGT mg, before me, the day of �� duty oo,r,m c, the On this nd or the tate of Oregon, GLORIA d andund sworn,a tun Public appearedn LARRY L. !SASSING ER and and sworn, personally wife. to Te known to be the individuals described In a and wh ereInstrument and acknowledged toct mld that td hey who and seal executed the foregoing instrument as their tree and voluntary signed sealed said Instrument the uses and purposes t rein mentioned• day and year in this WITNESS my hand and scat hereto thecertificate first above written- NOTAF Y L in for the • ; Stat., Orp ,Residing at u l►k v•. My comet l l l • Ni I �• • • et: N O Q. STATE OF OREGON us. COUNTY OF.1� 1 7 I�t,, before me, the this '� day of comml LA On �Nbiic In and for the State of Oregon.duly arid a Notary appeared PHILIP L. GERSTNEERiv and described 1n als $Idandwife, and sworn personally�� to me known to be then � � me that they � '} G and who executed the foregoing instrument and 5c tn0 ►ed[ that dfor and sealed said instrument as their free and voluntary act and signed herein mentioned. the uses and purposes t the day and year In this O rtif d WTTNESS my hand and seal here J' certificate first above written. s O O and for the 0 NOTA pP�URL 0 Stated 1 Rre ri, eliding at rl v ^4 GO i v t I. ;c. l I . 1 L. -5- k A\C1 . i 1 , 4 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOly WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED . COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND a Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual a Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument), Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: ,� II '� 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: C/ZA..c7 " ifettly 1 t Ifv M "t 0� 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. 11 . 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 04/17/98 13 : 13 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9802318 Amount : 1, 501 .28 04/17/98 13 : 13 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1013 BILL C. AN Init: LMN Project # : LUA98-062 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 501 .28 This Payment 1, 501 .28 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 501 .28 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 1 .28 ,, ..._ ',C 0 ••.. •:.--* .-...__- - Z Da c Z0 20CL1<0inq2)-/i••-i/k•I . / p •,'4: tirltrito,-;4-- , 1..15121.0ari,---.- ... ,10.4r.1016; l'.,4' '•gii,141,7•17.1,1,1011- - - minbilaisaw-111.-.7,7.-z_ .--. 4,,....,..,..2.......;:i.........;••/..!:!i,4:,45,?..',iii•••..,• ::::::::iiiiiiIiiiiiiiH::::" illri.ot•C.•f •••••i,,i•i•,,,iffil 1 ',4- r-,-,-_...._ —...41,--,-14-9-.b5e.u. ".1.:........,.../.....,:: ::,./,.....:..,, :.,:::.:.:::,., :HiiiiiiiHiii.:::::::::::::: Z ctf_ 0 0 0 2 vi CD CC 1 Z 1 ii!.a,!::.,11; 14: g.:41161 '•,,,', !. tild:1,.0 4liiltIRP11, IRIA, -,,,,,111411110.41441,;•,:':;,',..*:;'::::::ii.; ., ill.61,6:.i.i',-: iiiiH:iiiiiie::: ::iff:i .a ( s 1 4. ?fimitti, lpflkia, 4 4.t. i ' IA"yri.. lo'i"1:14,14" "iyig" .I.,""pia 1 ."ti, s'hiiitl 4,::"":..","g!•,1 i....:: -::::::: . iHiii Z z/-8 LOI ct 3 w ur, 0 ,.. ,, .. , ,', liqt1;itittli..1,,,,eplio ,L.,,Illi. 4; pi..;4' ,',4,141NP•14t, ;;Ii 4: 4.t.i. ,6.41 .. .9.11;14 "'........,""i""Vs'il"."......:.:2":":::::::•••••• < x—W cl 4 ''f :':',4,,iii-Ill'iqi.; '1.,lilili.iggi,Atmvitil,;,,,111,4111.ipPitift 11 iii/pAilL, ofri ,•.,..,Irp. gy.. .., 't,,t,..•±1,4teti: .il:'••Vi.i.;.!..1.fi\••••;L::::!::LiEiiiii.::::il I i ill -1 .• ti.21111&14', •....1'.1-t• q111,,,,41.11itikirit•1 IF.141511iii,1•••;71:id";1.. iiiii.itiq04 1,1 r1.:•.:11:''';.' 110 ' ',lAlaq fgatii,t ir•':A•••••••••••!:••••••••.•:‘4ViiAiiif::i :::: :::: ,, 0 cn, b- (..) m c•Nt o m._.- , ' '"i'l 111`:k.; ;lto'.4fir•in tillilitiiit t [IV'to loi ',,ii,- ! miti c., d., y, ,A 4.i i 1' 'Igerl.i.eit4' -,...,......:;:,4.:.',i;:::.•••••. :::: :::::: MNi: %.1 Z< 0 'fil'i 1 , '.4110,••• 1,rill,.4.141 1,1,^i, .4.y;,r14 ft,„.4 ,,,Iti, .LI 1..1,•'1,,_g. t4 I •1 .•4 tt.,•' i:..1.1.4.1,tiditt :•,•,•:•:,::;...,•;.••:.:•:Hii::::::::::••‘ 'a .i i ..•t, t•:mt., :4:!.0./Vittio tsfli 0°.,,,1 ap.3,11,15 t.'... ‘.,4'Ii'••-1'4"'""31 "", '.) t:,41,"' .," ..."'''',..li"...r". •:,.."'•"\•••••\:::::::::11: .,(2 a!,‘ ", -1 ,I, 1 ro 44,04,30 ;ol 4, ,,,,.,:. 4, .41,1!Ini, ,,,..,.`4,v., '.:!•.1'.. . •,•t, •••', —.••• 1,.........,:..,.r.•:•••-• , r . 4 il •Oit,,'1 , h'. ,t 1,. . :,Ii;i'., 1 4',,,4 "/II 4 ''IV,:t i,."" '.''..1,....:4.,N't iih,;,i,.v. ,..-,..,,.... .-ii..,, 1,1%,:,4 71„,qi.,-, ,. ,, ,,,,,,,,, ;1114'P 1' :1,,,''','.';77 ,,„,...,„-,..Z.,It •:,-,.r r.114.%/r1-;i1. 1ti:$0.;„ •.;','..-4 1.i.ii. ,‘'' ., '. ii,..4 4.. 11 i! ,...,•iltrir..p; i "tif.,i,it.t•.rt. : •"4"v 14.1.,•I" .", .C.,"",......0.,,; 04 ,. "al, - . "„ "1,,,,I i,1-,,fI :...",,4.:i,,,,g,,b1 i 1,11 /A , ,;•)f! ,, ,4,1, ,,eidi, .04 ,11 i.,1 MA o,_. .. ,t,, All i! ( ,it ,,,. i ',ii1,1 .!NM ,t i. 9"A.,,, ,.;. ory",,erlif,. 1 !..;,,i01,o`r0,1p illl01 ,::t li ' '''' "114 11 ql iiirii• '4/I ?.1 4" r.• ;, ,3,1..;114 , ' ". f„. `"4",.,440,4"," •:,tit,,,,.!iirl.: 1 ' 1.1',...it' .:4;;;::, \ "" t 'i•Et Oi. 41! 110" ito i i' ,...• a a ,, *lc .4, • 4.8.4!2,-..11. iita/ 1 r ,:: . -14.,',,..10'1-,' •111 ,o, , ,,,,,., ,,! i t, 1 1 ,, .. ,,..- ill . PP 1 711101 ' fi 4111 'il ''' ,., ,i c ti...,,,,,„ .efi.r,if,..'t( . . . • .t 1.15y, ..„.._ ,.kfili-,iiiiFi•;;;1:::: ': :.•••• 04-0 on •41,.'• '„ 1.',. .44 ;,, ( :,. 041,4. •. _,i .1• . ' • l'{u., r„ ', 41 ••4-• •,. 'e,It"Pi, . • : $411 ' 41'''I.2j.i%•tiiit ,i ,,,t,t . datiti. ,.,,,,,,, „,::„,,,,,„ .,...........„..,:,-,.„1 ,„„,,,,,,„ ji:Iiii:iiiiii.::.i.;.:.:i..ii.,: :;.Iiii4:::: ii iiill i' Ip1.5 1 •'111:11•1/N1 I. t., ,.•11,1. ...., I, ... / , , ,,,,.4 : :::::::::::: ,:::::::•':.,::...:.i::.',....:,.'.''.,::.::......'..'::11.1..f'..'..:':..:1.:i.:::..:::: .....:...•••...:,....:•.,•.1.:::::I::::::: ou,•A;•,'''t ...1*0).1t;,,- i ' V lit, • 4 " A 1. I: ;II 111, -1 plo•I,iiiii:illiiiiiiii .F.....1::::••••••••:::::,.:;",•?.'. 1 MI,:iT:i - ••• •••••••••• L. b 11 ;4./it 1101 i'• 'ith ifr ', ll. .!t IC !I./VI§' l•;41;'i,, Ili:, illtil ,I. i ' . '.' j 41( 4 tit E-t >4 1:4 C4 E.0 0-4 ill Ifik itfl.:i•.iP.4...:" l'if ! 1 iii'pl 1 i . . ; 41 .4 .•A, `41 V'• s : PA , IIN .i... Irf.l.r •••••:.•::::::: ;::::::::•••:: 01 ijlt,fitiifot IA.tl 1;%i 1 ••• Ilti.'" .{,f114. ,f".4'4 •:•••::::••••::::•..:,:'•::::::", ••••••••1:::•• I = ".•••":":•,". t 114;4*:•iii ill'i(', 4,, ,trilil f ftig :el:'4$., .• . . .drifi•iiiiiiiiiiii ))....,.;.1%.!!'0: ,-.1 VIP'.iiiiiiiii ".••,":n'illi" IIIi "4 /":Nt'17illt, a . Cto pA 0 ON t 40, , , i?.r.'0. ?". li'::''', i i•!...::.;Iiii:::*:i:: E".1 0 1...1 CT el iif, 4f gttr,',' 1, '. h • 1 • - obtp•:.::::•••••:••• • •,••••• •;:••• •""••1 ' ,p.I It, :::;:.::::::•:•..::12:14 ......:;,:•,. ::::::::::: cn g A E* '—' ,.. I 1 1.0.,,,,H,.., . . ( i;1 i• .‘' t. . ;'' 'l'il,,Illi 1,111;114.,tiliii. At.1.4.:::...:::::•.::: •:4::*•:.,:,..:•••••:i•• ::::::r:i t;g,t,• ::: ::::: ,......,,i,:"A,.?... :;;::::r•-•- ;T.,1 r...) ..et .—, ,• .• ii•,i; r ' 1 0/4 1••• -'•Ii.1.k. 414.4ft, •••:::::••::::• '••••••.:::.••••::••4•••••: ".:••:•::. 04;Ii•iii:::ii:i::h 4:•.'.1:•""")" --.""ii: 1 Ia. ‘: 1 If ..1ttrIlln 41,4,...;" I : iji":::;";•""•..,".:!iiiii iii: i Q ,..4 g lz4 <4 iro i • I A'.I 1 ' li;' 1 .' ' 11,11 iy, fk 4,tit.i.1,.. .,m2.:;,..."......::.••:,;:iii:.1!::.'I 4011* •IICZ 4 W 6.,fr4 0 • T.1 { '.;1' •ttir ii' ''' -4 ifillonom... lg.,. .:-.*,.:....i::::!•",t i;:iiiiisi.:':1• 1,.., , . A.4,44: ”:r,l'fis.- ....:.. :::•:::•1:•:: , e 1--4 r C, 10.,*;,' ki.. .. gir 0 .. -I.• ••• • / 4 1.,!;( '''. '1•;• iit4r 4.',Cu r .1.."4 r 4 n. •••:::•••••:::" ":".":....",..."tilt:••::••:"::••oko ; •::":"..:••:"• , .... c:o ria 0 1-n 0 0 c4 . . 4.,, 1.4 4•44;;t:,';,4,,/„:.'1 :f!" 'It, '3714.1104 •••411 1,4 . tocr •—i ' CM .11 r a = = . .... • : .„,„,,,,•• 1.1. .1 it A,...''.. .;*.' %,,,,p;: 1561:1i: ... .... . .. , C.7 7 1 ..Z,7i ! :1, 1;it,i'01,:it..9!••• •i!,.', ..' -.4 '6,' .A i 4.,,x.i,ii.:ii: "4.:ii....,,........f.:s.:in,-,,i,i:::::.ii::•',.1 d. g ( .11(li . 74,iiP,',i..;',.!ft : lii f, k,*,,,e'.1,t1,4211 • ' ?,i'i.44:.•4 ::i i44•••: •.:,....:::*.•••.:. •::::::::t•:::., ...0,hot,.:::y.b...L;ii:::::':II.;:..f.i:;..:..'.:i:;11::Si.i:::• p ci) iIi . 1.'1:14':.*',,.:;':,=.'';:fftli4;,ti':4,':it'l,..:...;..;:.:i.i:.:1.::41.11::iiii..1:i:i.i::!iiii:iiiiiiili::'....'..:...:.11:;.:**11.:‘;'.::."'.:•.:::...'.':1::,1.1.:':....:':: .:'.....'....:.:..::::....:•1:.i.:1:1..l...::•••!.1.::.:::sl..;.:::::!:.'.!.:.:.:.!.::.1:....4). I i '.,,f 1:,!flICE..Wk. l= ?..-,,, k j.,P .,,is• r.,,,., : :.,,,.,,,,,, •./: ,.,...,.,,,,,:1.:,4::.i,:t4..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. - ... .. ., pi % ,,....,1 ..,,,,,;,,,,,!1!k:. •i -4441141.r ji''. ' '''I ;:- liki;..ill.01 .:.:;*... .;•I•1.'.•:*•:.:•..........:.;:.. ,i/•.•.!.,,-• .',i,1,-4.1 !.•.. ,,:r:, ',iv P, .1i, ' C:0 sis (6 E 4- —.%-.4.-•. A ' C.? 1 ,1?c,-?•'.i...":,,,IT ;, ''' +4, „.. (:' :..r • ' 'i!-,z • ,, .1 . i/, ,i .. i 41 f '»t.U. . : L i',e?tV...:::iii7::::::!::::1/:::i.i.• = . z r) ' r.r.al 0 • ifi,,, 1p.t. i.,, .. .. t D t = • ; .".." A• ,..r,zutio,. ( iiige,itkilt .'" "" t"IF Pipr ' e".. . CO p ,11 "`?.:4ry'(OFIVillt •' IV,. L.:,.. *,i, 03 Z Arifiit !'•:ii!ii:1!i:i'..:.t:••,IS1')*.;. :iii, :•.• ..,'.i.,• N .,1 1-4,i,.. ..tf stir.har „,....•I , CC / IN, : ••••..:•••...: • • ...,,• .:::i1:::::1::::.!• • ltiVliflTdi .. X U W •,,4441-„r•silii:iiiiiiii: ',....•: '•Ii.':1 ::::.::.:::.::.::,- • -..4 jr,t •-OS .''LL ,,t.d „ :OA ,,,,..?0 I '.' .,,,i,1,,friti 4 til)ki ' ••• • .1!.1/..yi il • .. / ...4••••::::::•:::::••:. ,..'..*: ::::::1::::::i!: ,L' 12••••',ILL ::••••.::••••.:•••. .r.',.:' "fr-44...e... '1,'' 1:' ,• Pil 4'.0 t !Nal!lam''mr".'• . •1 . : N 1651 / \\ ._... /0 W / .„...,:„. .:::::::::„,:::.„.:::::„.....,.. ,.:::.:,:iipi:::.::- , tvii;.,ii:,;;;;z:11:.:,.... . ...,..z.:::...;:i,,,;.7.4..iliyi.ii,./: . ,,,,,01. :44 1 •• ; ' in 'II rIA :IVI iii:; :ii r•i...'.4:5.: :f.:i.::::.:7:.1.:::.:*::.: P IP. - .S4 (1) tll, IlAii.11;I 911,f; :' osh,lt ::::::::::::ii•*4 *•,•)•:•:•• •:::•:::•::::::••': tll (1) g 0 ....).,..8v 6/ 41 4. ''':'' 114;t4.;4'''!4•,!''.;• L.L1, .., , , l' 4'. i', /1, : ft-.T.j.1 CI) "nwt: ii:iliiii::::::i ii.:• "•*".• ." "' "• .•••" "zt.s" :::::i::::::11.••"it....":p.":::::::::"'"i" .4iih.-!ii!iiiiiiii!!: s..., Le-. (4-t (...) ;1''1°f;1.;4; tc,11;‘ ' ;' I a) 4c-4 .4;. 4,•.,,i,,,i‘ik,;-,)r...1::;• :p.,• .,•,;-•,.taw - ,i4ini :::::.::::::::: :Rig.; •&•.,, •••:•••:•••:•••:•.• „.. ,!•; f', ..„.,., . tid,:lw ::::iiii:::::ii iii'.0,,,3•:,::::i::::-:::i::::-;.: ti --da) . t) .404; :ii::::;;I::::::..,:44,4:,:•....i,:::.:.:::i:::.::::::: ,isr.--,::4;••,::• ,-, ,: • t.'•'ffig)!' 2 42 2)11 .44.4,, •:::;•::::::: 1 ••••••.-..,/.4•::;::::::::::::: ',..41.04,""in-t" "". :11,1-",4/11/4,",i, ,, ,4 i;Ir .„t$.1. ::i::::: ::. A:.1(•'•1:::::::::::1:::!:': I 411 f/L114.1:'''.;P'i 11"1;f 0:';11' '' 1 11:". SAIJ,C1',1::iiiiii:!ii iA0..:*:4;•'.,..:11.:iiiiiiiiiiii.'I- arogcl,'• •• ••••••'':•.:4 it: ....•••:••••••:•.'t••••:••::••::••:••:• .. P.4 (..). U > a.) ( :. ',,•:•„;,•,,,,, ..:: i; ;;1;: .,006. '' '1F,1.41414, , I/ • 4,,i.:44••••••••••••••••••••••:;•*::-if::• •::•:::•:::•:::::::. II II .11 1.. 1;';;Ii!j•,4,1,;'••'.•;••.: J-1 4 k :i • it .4+4+4,Vi1":•1:::::::,i, '. .!'.1414rilk:'5- tC '11. ''.4- 1.• :'.- '.' - '• "•••:': -;:into , ""0. :" "f "‘. • 41.4', - ;*41.,:',,,..::::.::.N.........:...... .::•;:,11....::::::::::::::::::.: ; 1.-rtr, .. .1i ,. ',1,, :•,:. ,0;,,,14.1 '%.,„ ..,....,:, :!: Fi i:?:! :.::. . ' "j • • ....•... .,;371,14:::ixt6.........'.........'.........*:L...........:,:.......,................."...;:.:.:5?.........,....,........!....:.•.!..:.*:.:...:•:...i..:•1..::::;.!:.ii::/..1..::::.:.:..::...... ' i k:'•:••:::'••I :::::::: .4 t ( '''ll.,:t.4E'' '''''''' ;''. :::':$:°-...,,Aci.:;;,,,,l ro.--, , 0 s::::.•:•: ',• 1 if.• •::,. ,,4.; ,1,:.:: • .....,T:••-.4 • .-F,,';;:4, -:.A'4,i;d414',„•;,t,1;e1 '3" •., ,;1'-',.; (%. ; 1 I.141,...7„141;4,. 1 I; :it'•I,•, •••• •.:1.a , , ,,,".•"". -1"44'4, 1"i" ,.'":".:"" "" "IA.'tit• "A"T"• n."?"," " • ..t q 3 i • i•'? !,.•ri. , ...- :.,. I ;qpgylk irAlt' '0 0, ••sti 1 1 I ..........••••••:••:.t.,•:..,..:•::• .:•:::\:.:.:ii " Veil'Ilk 1 ti . k?'Mi;elii 0! M ......./.........../1.76.7.::::gq,.1:.:.li iiiiiii.•:i'il ...i.vl i i,04,i'L,• !'.'..,_.4.4 L. ' 'm. '. 4:natcom ...-----.\ .t.4, 'slik,..Z?; /'ti '..:••••••. -,,•"": •. 7 .....!.......;:...i:•::..:::::::1:•:: 11 I •'.:: ..,.'z- ••:J^,:,,.4..,,, I, 'or,,o,.7,flig 1 .-- .;/..,..liy, 2 ••::...:::••'..:•••:17•4',i,fl:I::i:ii:::':•::1:••ii: i;i•,~,i'.•I•;' Li. $1, '1!<7.'”; 'i..)'' i' _,kjui, N..--(3 \ • • • ,;.;.1:•••. ....:i::!:::::ii::1:::.::•:i. r 1.,..... •;• ,•.s. ,4:::, .?1,."ii,, ;•,,- i„ RI,A '''....:1;i , It'• *1\-,,m. i 94,4'"CI AR! .1E ,- p,4.7 i ....,:::::.:::::.:::::,,,,,,,,,,,.!.::::::iiiii(i's::!*1 , . ‘.;4.1 ,....-s„:,'4,'. Ir.. t',,,lit.;:;!...:.•,:ii i•i: \ ,..'4'' at :::::::::::::iji.,:''....,..:-..::::-..:',.:::-:.•••iii,s7i.:!..::.•iii -:'.4.,i-..s.'XI:,."•4,11!..)!•'• z•i; `•14'kt .1*i11.4}9 t!"1011 A IMINIMIP •;s:",*?: irA:::::::.::::•:.:::...y...::::::,if.....:..:i:::::i•!iii.::i:;•,:::i•j••'.i.:.i.ii- 1 ';•'•'y#,;,1f:::•:::•::•::::•.•::f.i.1::..':::11‘...•i iiiiiiiff ii-f:'77II I"".,.. .1 kiit•., • -,,,. .,,k,,1,, sr, . ii . ,,,,,l'e 1:::,;',..,"* :......:.:4.zz.:,..:::: ,.:iysiiiiiiiiiiiiii.'f . • -.,...i,F,;‘, -!.e 14,,,,,,:•,4,, ' , - ,... ,-,.., ,-... -0,,:::::::::..".. ..k.,.i!....:ks..i.:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ,,:. ,, 1 ii,:p: ,,,4,,,,,/,-..ks ,;',,,,,,..:.:,:t.,11.,,-,,,,,,,,m gal tex',::igt,,,,,,, oe,. ............•::.;,..v......,..-.::::k:11::ii:::::.::i::i: illikairt. t1I'• 044:10° .•::,:•:.••••••• '....''.• i!li'.1 ..iii:••••••111::.i.::•;!!!:.:.'l I ..' .• / . !I:id,i 4:':lk '' . '1 tt4, _k_IN itaiM * Nirlf 01).._.746SC::::/:::•iii Villi •:i;.,.:Y'........i..P1/7i1N::!!!!!11,: , ' I 41-:'.... ,,' .4..t"t.ie",,.".—.• ;,.•..,t" 4 il#1r.14':',Afi,'I*el*j',.., . .• ••••••;g:....1';‘,‘•::: :•:,....:.i.j.•.•:;:::::,iiiii:iii:: :1./ ' .ii;':'.i': .. !..` !, ibis",+ ii.,•••.;i..,,.1fON'4,.4 le,ip ,,,,,,, . '6CP:;:"....:........,./tii;;':4iL7/„„!!11.:':....:::::•:•:;5i:ii:iii:iii:iii::. .40,:144.1'r .. ..././1.....:.1::•:•://...'d'iAiL.',.4...":Ti.•:::::;:::.........:•:;11.://j:•:::',71:'.:ii! 1 • ,..;.. . ....,. • • 'L.'', !'. . l'''. ‘.•' 44-.'3.• trt A N"T""7fik i‘.•41$1111''Li.., 41...,•••••'' ••••••••••••••••••• ..::":!4'.''''Y'':1::::','*•:•:•:•:•:•••••••••;•:::•:::•:::•:::: , 1 L'., ..I.:.1 ',,''Ll'' . • 4" I. ' V.I L •' ,_'"•• *.'''"'''.. ''': '''.'":.''''""'.'''''';'''. ':''''''.''''.: .••••••'•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•••:::::::::::::: . .L 4.. , tr,.,o •,eti,,,tc, ,...„. . ! 1 ;,•,r ,L,,t•d::-',,x, ' 4,..:'..3i1. .,1,...v. .....ai • ,.......e' ;'''''''.........4.....::::...........:.:::.:::.:::.::.:.::.:,...,f,:.•••••,......,....::::.:.,c;.•••....::.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::.:.:.•i::ii,si::: i 1 ,',:i•:', i‘'*4.7.•': 'tid':-,,,,'::•:':4111610,41111:. .. %, ...:•".,:,i'..'.1..:.......:•:......:,".::...:.:::.::•::::::::::::::::::::::.:::/......,a,PP .....::::::::::::.....iii.....::::::::::::::4:::.,3:7/;:i7: I , ..;..-',,,.....e...-I-,' '.'At ••,,? ' ..'K••••••••••••••:'..•••••••••••••,:;/...:.::•:.:::::•::::...:•:••:•:::::*''''4',1•':.:'-'4VS.4-.•::::::•:::::::::•::::: ::::::: ::.•.:,F.. , _Fp' "11014,"";0...•'"""""."'":"'"::'"::;:•"":•f"."*.• .:ii'7.'.,"::"*"....42M "Ir le "' i' "1" 'Itiv A; •14 lc .'.....''.V.....'./•••''.....I:A.••• •Li.i:':••••;:A ii......?•:? ••••••••••••••.::::::::•:•:•:•:.::::::•;•;.;.;.;.:.:;:: t '1'..t.':11,7 il.'.11:1L l'el.ii.,1 L' 7741;:li 1•ik''' %..141::tlitil''...'..,..'..'S':..'..'...;.'://......*...1'........":';:i, ,:.:tf''.!Ai,..i..;?f;:i'.'.::'.•:::::'::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;.' i '11,".'r.? ic,..-:',1 .', x't.'• '1.4',I 4.1.;',1,..,..',-,i‘4.:',I!ii:;:i;. L:1;i::: ..:::....................:..........,...._,..................7.......,.4,y/;.;;;;::;::c.f.;..:[1:....,:f.)....................................::::.::.:?.:::::::::::::::::::::::..1:::::::** 8 . , •,',, ,'Tii::e,'.''" . I" 'r•'T '...3..•........'/,'Or/':VIlr'.:Z•••••.:::::i..i?i.i''. '...:::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::........::::::::::;• t.1 4.1 I. :1/4 f.,: .4',1 1.1."k '' '4,1,"''"""jr"ki,1111%,".' ' ' g'e."57"."."",".:""!."4".""".".•:•:".....":".:::::"....":"...::::::::N4,:______ _., o ' •. 3"- 14:, ,1111'1;:itt. L.4.1!:."."."';"ille..,f:A••:".":"...".."..*""":".".:**•";*';*•."*".".•"*."":":" La Li 0 2 I r...... ... _....... • r.' " '•1. , .. .t.,..'th*.....::•••;.?Aggi'................;•:.:.•••::::::.....:.:•:•;•;.;:::•••••••.;;;••• Z i z 7 D I j.k.'H lt,1.101:'' e ,' 1., .01q4k..:•::::•,...:......................:.:::..... .0..../k. 1,,.:::.....• .......................1......,7:44 t.... . ,,,.• U ca 1 ;t 4 1 L_JI = l . . •• ••••••••••••• •••••• . •••.•.•,•.....•••.•.•.•.•.•••••••..•.•.•.•.••• ,._. I 6 . m . I . • • "•• • '7',!.• .' • ,• '.• ... . . . . i. • , , . .• ,,„ , ----, ill-- , " L L htZ I - . Pa..Z1 4 -,,,---,t4-- J m 1 1 V —... 4. , i 4. 6" la gil ac. , • -.,. TREE CUTTING/LAND CLEARING PLAN I SECTION 30,TOWNSHIP 23 N.RANGE 5 E.WM V) CfTY OF RENTON,KNG COUNTY,WASI-tGTON Q I CL C,_ E n I ; u. 0 zz Z NITS OF SITE Q J I __� CLEARING TYP.) Ul 4 , . _ '" MIS T — — o _ - �' a o • �g v ,//7 • L \ T I i. aT 1 3 1 i Ua e= a I I / ,\ / ?i 1 jj 1 �" 1±1 -L I. 0 yi SE T WESTERN E D BNBHOTEL I 0f • �� UNITS OF SITE e1 Hi T \ \ -� 'a CLEARING(iW.) / \ UNITS OF SITE I 1 I �, CLEARING(7YP.) - 1e` i j 0 1. Q s i : E / \ \ . k/ W -• LIMITS OF SITE I - r�i�a I j • 1 \ _ _ CLEARING(T7P.) _ ! W L I — � � � � 11 _ 11/ F EINg ze___— ( / s !, I I h I I -- / Q i a ' ,n;NT1 ZZZgT CLEARING NOTE: NO EXISTING TREES LOCATED ON/OR L., , I I ADJACENT TO THIS SITE.ALL CLEARING "" 1' LEGE11) WILL NE COMPRISED OF REMOVAL MIMED =MI OF GRASSESAe's i �!1 ydia1B91 • (� e.A�n = Be�L J�'1 n MM.VIE �=a = = OWNERS REPRESENTATNE E o M.C. ABERNATHY RWNW g �4. `: sawm 5.m u MOLE • 0 M2 .CONSTRUCTION RD.N.E �t FI`t`(•C ...ram sr[n u[ __-- OLYMPIA.WA.98506 °__ l_ are,..os. CONTACT• [7. g} (pCatO MIKE COHEN 73J{ (360)456-6307 .._ OF RENTON s TREE CUTTING/LAND CL.EARNO 9 i PLAN MS v s t ClEARG •••••44,.w,M./ Demo, ITC-_ _ Loa- I .• D.. roam ..a r-m _ w% We,..,..a — _1 Dew m e f I PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN v1 SECTION 30,TOWNSHIP 23 N,RANG 5 E,WM r II CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON a n- r I z°- >3 a a .• -• #� oOIC eio�wM'la �T 4T VAULT NRREETTAKEYSTONE 6 6 b I . y,pyq 4p5,�. m.,a n 403 10 \ F e ; O r - i u'S0 N �8 95 ji 1 A uua� am. —_. — 1: _:a-_ — .--..\;° �,i,Pi �s ffi' i jai ( . A 4 . _ a' ei 9 I I o E. € : ,i r �,. . . �. `' "_ �' li 1Nev imerom 1 x -'W .,:a i riroi ,=. . a 5s / 5s 55 a ;a I fETANNO WAIL 1 I I 5 • •\ isr — \\ / © -� i? I O ci E, 3-517e:.siI 1 - \ PROPOSED 88 MIT _ -+;iq 1 / �i 6 .d BEST WESTERN HOTEL xt a w a� _ \ ( % FF-21.40 a,. Q 4 >I T \\ \ \\. \N �mp . f _iv. / ; i g a Q I \ \ i •. N r m.. (M,1 / 7 i �'444 IIWWLL i hr}}� �f� I''"t % \ R' k/ 6 I, ''' 1 /‘ ---- t 7.,,.,,,.,..____.4--- ...._ — —.— — .P.4_1(nlV__CRE _.— _ — — —. —IPFIcrw:0 ki III@ ! C "� — m_---- s p i = 4 5 Z NEW Pi7VATE ACCESS ROAD I <o ry�m CFNMB CROBBNO CULVERT ' S!i id� 1 a Ij !ON RlWN91INf5 I LEAD, APPROXIMATE EARTH 1 E WORK OUANTITE& OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, 0.. 01>a.,. 6 aroi fl SIN • o CUT(EXPORT) 1,300 C.Y. M.C.CONSTRUCTION b��ssx, � J� �Jo 2142 ABERNATHY RD.N.E ` 10,t,... STORM DRAW.LIE 4 ` FILL(IMPORT) a 3,000 C.Y. OLYMPIA,WA.98506 ,f�`^�� 4 ` i WW1'SEVER LK - - CONTACT �,,,�.• y► MIKE COHEN aul c'4' b �e°` _. wmars+ (360)456-6307 I :C t. ]p nCfTY OF RENTON , 94043 ri S.4£ 0.0 SPOT ELEVATORS PRELMINARY GRADING AND 5 SW r � STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 003 MO . ...... mom i»>` re s/e/40 wee. R maw u_ ma x+v. • •rx ure �v�� •�. 1 cF 1 file.P:,5OOPOJ060BB\0NGMFFPoNG\B68B-PGO.PNC Dot/Tune 04/14/1990 ,5.51 kola.1-20 Allen%rer.: 24680-52e6ee-e, A ,..-. ,em, -L.— ,°'w" P,.. e —. PPP—SS—TTTT _e o� 1•� CITY OF PRELMINARY UTILfTY SERVICE PLAN — e. \ tfit RENTON — ®� I • :� PWnnir�9/9uileincgn PYe1. Warke Dept. N0. REMAON 9( OAIE APR „reW�� Cragg Z ertn P.E,Mminiahatw a --4_--i1- --/r EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY 5 1¢ -IVY. I-f 3m tf A 4 4s r A 1701 *Irwin )1 Alla BOY` ;,.. j" a. 1 s • 7 I \ � J di l � ar' g O Pi \ I i ! _ (� _R, I I \' ► 1I 1 �- I rn 44 i 9\ 0 _ i . r P 11 N I I I qg > 9q 1 1 1 • I ; M I 1 I / C rn 1iI / 1 •, _ � 1 fill I 1 Ii:.rirr ---__ `1ii /1I1( • z rateliairl INi _ ii -_ =� \V A om Nh \ p r o e,, Q aHgV TITLE: 1 LOCATION Q` to 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 0 WI, PRELIMINARY UTILITY SERVICE PLAN NENi,WA 98032 1 p �'• )1— (208)251-6222 +. (2De)251-8782 FAx 3650 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY i m �'`<,,, EEC a�'RDoxutZxrAPVsrmiC'. PROPOSED 88 UNIT BEST WESTERN HOTEL RENTON,WASHINGTON B.C.E.JOB NO. 6688 Bradley-Noble Geotechnical Services A Division of The Bradley Group, Inc. 2401 Br stol Court SW, Olympia, WA 98502 PO Box 12267, Olympia, WA 98508-2267 Phone 360-357-7883 FAX 360-754-4240 SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR THE NEW RENTON MOTEL PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON This report presents the results of our subsurface investigation for the new three-story motel project in Renton, Washington. Our purposes in exploring the subsurface soil conditions were to evaluate the bearing capacity of the site soils, to present recommendations for foundation design, and to address cther geotechnical considerations for this project. We understand that the new motel will be a three-story, wood-frame structure, situated on the south area of the lot at the setback from the existing stream. Parking for the motel will be on the north side of the lot. Work was authorized by Mr. Mike Cohen, Principal of MC Construction Consultants, the project's design/builder. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions Phe project is located west of State Highway 167 and east of East Valley Highway in south Renton. The project site is level with East Valley Highway and slopes down to the north to the mini-storage facility. A creek flows across the property east to west on the south side of the property. We found standing water in the northwest corner. There are broken concrete and large boulders on the surface. Adjacent to the street, a tow-behind vibratory compactor is stored. Vegetation on the site consists of low grasses . Subsurface Conditions We originally mobilized to the site to conduct the subsurface exploration on the 15th of February 1998 . The ground surface from the recent rains was too soft to support the drill truck. We arranged for a dozer to pull the drill on the site and returned to complete the work on 23 February 1998 . We explored the subsurface conditions by five test borings at locations indicated on the enclosed site plan. These 98030301 Page 1 of 7 98030301 Page 2 of 7 explorations were made using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger to advance the borings and to provide borehole support between sampling intervals . Samples were obtained at standard intervals using a two-inch outside diameter, split-spoon sampler driven by a pin-guided, 140-pound weight free falling 30 inches . The blows per six-inch interval were recorded. The first six-inch drive interval is allowed for seating the sampler. The blow counts for two six-inch intervals, when combined, yield the Standard Penetration Resistance (N-value) of the soils encountered in the sample interval. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the consistency of cohesive soils . The results obtained from the Standard Penetration Test, along with other tests and engineering judgments, were used to develop the recommendations of this report. The 750 John Deere dozer was barely able to move the drill through the northwest corner of the site. This area had ponded water which saturated the soils to depth. On other areas on the site, the drill truck sank into the soft surface soils . Two soil units were found in our explorations . There is a fill section that varies in thickness from six to ten feet on the site. Underlying the fill section, we found the native soils which are organic silt and peats in the upper level, becoming more sandy with depth. Even at depth, there are layers of peat and fine organics . The native soils become more dense with depth. We carried a column of water in the auger once we penetrated the fill section. This was to help hold down the native soils . Even with the water column, hydrostatic uplift of soils into the auger occurred between sampling intervals when we drilled below 20 feet from the surface. The near-surface ground water level is found about 15 feet below the site. The stream on the south side of the property does not appear to influence the ground water level, probably because of the relatively impermeable soils that confine the stream. 98030301 Page 3 of 7 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Existing Fill Section We found the existing fill section to be loose and comprised of soils that we suspect are excess soil and strippings from other construction projects in the area. This fill material also contains construction debris . Our opinion is that it would be uneconomic to excavate this fill section to expose native soils and replace it with a controlled structural fill section. We expect that the actual bearing capacity and settlement characteristics of this fill section will vary point to point on the site. We do not recommend its use for support of foundations . Additional structural fill material will be required along the north property line. This will allow construction of the parking area as indicated on the plans . It may be practical to use the existing fill material in the parking areas to construct this fill section. Removal of unsuitable material and highly organic material will be required. If the work is done during the dry season, the existing fill material may be aerated, dried to less than optimum moisture content, and placed for support of parking areas . Density under paving sections should meet a minimum compaction of 95% of ASTM D 698 . On the surface of the new fill section and the soils exposed in the existing fill, we recommend that a geotextile support fabric equal to Marifi 500X be placed according to the manufacturer's recommendations . On the surface of the geotextile, the ballast section and paving section may be placed. We expect that a retaining wall will need to be constructed along the north property line. The existing fill surface level is about seven feet above the footing level for the mini-storage unit. Construction of the new fill section along the north property line may induce secondary consolidation into the existing foundation of the mini-storage units . We recommend research be conducted into the type of foundation used and site preparation method for the mini-storage. This information may influence 98030301 Page 4 of 7 construction in this area. Once this information is available, we should be consulted to prepare recommendations for design of structural fills or retaining walls in this area. Foundation For the support of the new motel, we recommend the use cf driven wood piles . Based on the N-values, we expect that piles can develop capacities in the 20- to 25-ton range at 25 feet below the existing ground surface. Wood pile capacity is in part determined by the cross sectional area of the pile tip. Imposed loads of 1000 pounds per cross section square inch of the pile tip should be used for design. We recommend a minimum tip diameter of eight inches . If higher capacity piles would be beneficial, then the use of closed end steel-pipe piles should be explored. The hydrostatic pressures moving sand up the auger limited our depth of exploration. Prior to the ordering of the production piles, we recommend that a minimum of four test piles be driven in the building site. These piles should have a minimum length of 40 feet. Use of test piles will allow evaluation of production pile lengths and actual developed capacities based on resistance to driving. To minimize cost, these test piles may be driven at production pile locations so that they may be reused. We should be consulted for the recommended location of the test piles . Driving stresses may induce quick conditions in the native sands . If this condition develops, then we recommend that the pile be allowed to stand for a few minutes to allow the excess pore pressure to drain. It has been our experience, that once the pore pressure has drained, the pile cannot be started without difficulty or damage to the pile. All piles should be installed by an experienced pile contractor. We recommend that fixed leads be used to ensure proper placement and control of the pile during installation. Use of the Engineering New Formula is acceptable for wood piles driven to a maximum end-bearing capacity of 35 tons each. 98030301 Page 5 of 7 Piles should be pressure treated Class B wood piles with a natural taper from butt to tip. All pile tips and butts should be banded. Pre-drilling or pre-excavation at the pile location may be necessary because of debris in the fill section. If allowed by the Building Official, use of recertified used piles might allow economy of foundation construction. You should be aware that breakage of used and recertified piles can be higher than in new piles . Piles should be placed no closer than four feet center to center. Reduction in pile capacity resulting from group action will occur. Typical configuration of three to six pile groups will experience a reduction of 15% . Lateral loads may be resisted the use of battered piles . Use of bending moments in the piles for lateral loads is not practical. With the relatively short length of the piles, the fine grained soils, high water content and ground water level, use of battered piles is recommended for seismic loadings . Batters should be limited to a maximum of 3: 12 (horizontal to vertical) to prevent loss of end-bearing capacity of the pile. Ground Level Floor The existing fill section offers poor support for concrete slabs on grade. Even excavation and replacement with a thin structural fill section supported on geotextile is not expected to improve the long-term service life of the slab. The owner can expect slab on grade to settle and deflect. In time, the slab will have to be replaced. Differential settlement of the parking areas from the pile-supported structure will occur. The amount of settlement cannot be predicted because of the variable composition and density of the fill section. We recommend that the ground floor system use a concrete plank system or wood framed floor. The plank or wood framed floor can be supported by the pile and grade beam system. This system will provide a floor slab that will not settle. An alternative to the plank system would be a pile-supported structural slab system. An economic analysis is recommend to determine which system is the most cost effective. 98030301 Page 6 of 7 Seismic Site Period The project area is in Seismic Zone 3 as shown by Figure 18-2 , Seismic Zone Map of the United States, in the 1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code. Actual ground motion during a seismic event is influenced by the distance from the epicenter, the depth to bedrock under the site, and the condition (degree of consolidation and saturation) of the soils supporting the structure. We believe that the underlying soils are prone to spontaneous liquefaction under major seismic loadings . Available geologic information, as presented in Thickness of Unconsolidated Sediments, Puget Lowland, Washington by Hall and Othberg, 1974, shows a sediment thickness of about 800 feet under the project area. We believe that these soils are granular and are well consolidated below the Green River flood plain deposits because of loading by the Vashon glacial ice mass. We recommend that a soil coefficient type S3 be used for seismic design. LIMITS OF LIABILITY BRADLEY-NOBLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES is responsible for the opinions and conclusions contained in this report. These are based on the data relating only to the specific project and locations discussed herein. This report was prepared within the standard and accepted practices of our industry. In the event conclusions and recommendations based on these data are made by others, such conclusions and recommendations are not the responsibility of the soils engineer or engineering geologist unless he has been given an opportunity to review them and concurs in such conclusions or recommendations in writing. The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained in the explorations at the locations indicated on the attached plan. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between these explorations . The nature and extent of variations between explorations may not become evident until construction is underway. Bradley-Noble is to be given the opportunity to review the final plans and specifications for soils work. 98030301 Page 7 of 7 This is to verify that our geotechnical engineering recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the final design and specifications . We also recommend that we be retained to provide geotechnical services during the foundation construction and trenching. These services would include review of backfill operations, excavations, and other geotechnical considerations that may arise during construction. We would observe compliance with the design concept and project specifications . If the subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated in our explorations, we would also evaluate changes in construction specifications . BRADLEY-NOBLE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES Report prepared by: David C. Strong Engineering Geologist Please see attached soil engineer's review letter. 30 March 1998 1235 EAST 4TH AVE FiriPM SUITE 101 _ �� OLYMPIA,WA 98506 (360)754-9339 FAX(360)352-2044 MC SQUARED INCORPORATED March 30, 1998 Bradley Noble Geotechnical Services P 0 Box 12267 Olympia, WA 98508-2267 RE: SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR THE NEW RENTON MOTEL PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON Dear David: We have reviewed the attached seven page soils report entitled "Soils Investigation Report for the New Renton Motel Project in the city of Renton, Washington. This report was prepared by you based on field work performed by you and your firm. MC Squared, Incorporated has reviewed this report and the conclusions contained therein. It is our opinion that the report and the conclusions meet the standards of good geotechnical practice for this place and time. MC Squared's recommendations and opinion are based on our review of the field information and soils logs presented to us. MC Squared has made recommendations to you regarding allowing bearing stresses, lateral resistance and loads, site period, and other items of an engineering nature. These recommendations and conclusions have been included in the attached report. If you have any questions, or I may be of further help, please call me at (360) 754-9339. Sincerely yours, Q\'‘ � s CG' - MC SQUARED, INC. �w ` 9 4/ Is ti '� "y 15227 cc . ' °A• FGISTEf'.,* VINCE MCCLURE, PE Ssionrr v• ,`,�s 3-3o-48 Principal +sxra+t s Q$J17! 9Q STRUCTURAL • FOUNDATION • CIVIL ENGINEERS 1 O i il la 1 igi re 1 cli !hbi lit i Ph1 44 MC:. .. • I\, i \ 0' illimil ill . . Ua 2 i i f 1t I lit' . \ I V li I . 1 I I it 1 _I-- a-ir\ , \-1/ la ZT ;:1) Iti ri }= I • „ , „. ` li Ia \ \L ( 8\ 1I I i; Z- a\,. \ I I 1 4i1 --� \ y 1,YALIMEI atECrzre .LsVN I GENERAL NOTES FOR SOIL INVESTIGATIONS CONDUCTED BY AUGERED BORINGS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION All sample classifcations are reviewed by a soils engineer in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System ASTM D-2487 . Field soil classifications are in accordance with ASTM D-2488. SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS Dd: Dry density, pcf LL: Liquid limit PL: Plastic limit W : Moisture content qp: Penetrometer value, tsf qs : Vane-shear strength, tsf qu: Unconfined compressive strength, PI: Plasticity index tsf N: Penetration resistance per foot or fraction thereof, of standard 2-inch O.D. , 1. 3-inch I .D. , split-spoon sampler driven with a 140-pound weight free falling 30 inches, in accordance with Standard Penetration Test Specifications ASTM D-1586 Apparent ground water level at the time noted after completion SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS COHESIVE SOILS Unconfined Compressive Comparative Consistency Blows/Foot Strength (tsf) Very soft 0 - 2 0 - 0 . 25 Soft 2 - 4 0 . 25 - 0 . 50 Medium 4 - 8 0 . 50 - 1. 00 Stiff 8 - 15 1 . 00 - 2 . 00 Very stiff 15 - 30 2 . 00 - 4 . 00 Hard 30+ 4 . 00+ NON-COHESIVE (GRANULAR) SOILS Relative Density Blows/Foot (N-Value) Very loose 0 - 4 Loose 4 - 10 Firm 10 - 30 Dense 30 - 50 Very dense 50+ DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS SS: Split spoon DB: Diamond bit core AU: Auger sample CB: Carbide bit core WS: Washed sample RL: Ring-lined sampler TC: Tri-core drilling ST: Shelby tube - 3" O.D. (except where noted otherwise) IMMINIMMENNIZINMEINIMM JOB #: 98.03-03 DATE: 2/23/98 TESTING BY: D. Strong Renton Motel Site MC Construction Consultants Boring No. 1 , west end of building pad 0 Blows/6"drive using a 2.0" O.D. split-spoon sampler Fill Section I 5-6-7 Firm moist reddish brown silty fine sands with N=13 organics -5' 1 1-4-5 Loose gray and brown silty sands with brown organics N=9 1-2-4 Loose gray and brown silty sands over organic N=6 silt and peat -10' 1-1-4 Loose brown peat interbedded with gray silty sands N=5 Native Soils I 3N=3 6 3 Loose gray silty fine sands -1 5' I6-4-12 Peat over firm gray silty sand N=16 -20' 10-17-17 Firm gray silty fine sand -24' I N=34 Vertical Scale 1.0":5.0' Bradley- Noble Geotechnical Services JOB #: 98.03-03 DATE: 2/23/98 TESTING BY: D. Strong Renton Motel Site MC Construction Consultants Boring No.2, center of building pad 0 Blows/6"drive using a 2.0" O.D. split-spoon sampler Fill I 11-24-10 Loose brown plastic silts with organics; driving on construction rubble -5' I12-8-5 Firm brown plastic silty sand over sandy gravels N=13 1-1-1 Very loose silty pebbly sand fill over peat -10' Native Soils ' 2N-5-7=12 Firm brown silty sands -15' I4-8-10 Firm gray silty fine sand over dark gray medium N=18 sand with wood -20' sands under hydrostatic pressure 4-15-18 Dense dark gray medium sands -24' N=33 Vertical Scale 1.0":5.0' Bradley- Noble Geotechnical Services JOB #: 98.03-03 DATE: 2/23/98 TESTING BY: D. Strong Renton Motel Site MC Construction Consultants Boring No. 3, east end of building pad 0 Blows/6"drive using a 2.0" O.D. split-spoon sampler Fill I 3-5-6 Firm brown silty fine sand with organics N=1 1 -5' I8-19-8 Firm moist brown and gray plastic silty fine sands N=27 with rubble 2-2-2 Loose brown peaty silt N=4 -10' Native Soils I 4N-2-35 Loose gray silty fine sands = -15' I2-4-10 Firm gray silty fine sands N=14 -2( ' sand loosening from hydrostatic pressure 1-5-8 Firm dark gray medium sands -24' II N=13 Vertical Scale 1.0":5.0' Bradley- Noble Geotechnical Services JOB #: 98.03-03 DATE: 2/23/98 TESTING BY: D. Strong Renton Motel Site MC Construction Consultants Boring No. 4, east center parking area 0 Blows/6"drive using a 2.0" O.D. split-spoon sampler Fill 9-14-12 Firm brown plastic silts and silty sands; high blow N=26 count because of weathered brick -5' 2-4-9 Firm brown and gray moist plastic silty sands with N=13 organics - 2-2-3 Loose moist gray silty sands with construction -9' N=5 debris of weathered bricks over gray and dark brown peaty silt Boring No. 5, west center of parking area surface had standing water 0 Blows/6"drive using a 2.0" O.D. split-spoon sampler Fill I 6-6-3 Loose brown silty and very silty moist fine sands N=9 over brown pebbly sand -5' Ii-2-4 Loose brown silts with organics over gray silts and N=6 silty fine sands 2-2-2 Loose gray silty fine sands over brown peaty silt _9. "lafive N=4 grading into gray peaty silt Vertical Scale 1.0":5.0' Bradley- Noble Geotechnical Services -1 q$ -O(oL LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE REPORT FOR RENTON MOTEL LOCATED ON EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY JUST NORTH. OF S.W. 4t5r STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON g T. Coil,- OUR JOB NO. 6688 g' / APRIL 3, 1998 ,A0 kci `848 ' S/ON AL c 0 EXPIRES 4/10! Prepared By: 0 of 10,,� BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 GHq� (425) 251 -6222 4z s( CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C r%hG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 3.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 4.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM'S DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM SCREENING 5.0 RESOURCE REVIEW A. BASIN RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT B. CRITICAL ARE DRAINAGE MAPS C. FLOODPLAIN FLOODWAY FEMA MAPS D. OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS E. SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIOS F. SWM DIVISION, DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION SECTION PROBLEM MAPS 6.0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOILS SURVEY 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS 8.0 CONCLUSION APPENDIX Exhibit A Vicinity Map Exhibit B Drainage Area Map Exhibit C Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table Exhibit D Assessor's Map Exhibit E Basin Report Exhibit F Sensitive Areas Folio Exhibit G Wetland Inventory Maps Exhibit H Drainage Complaints Exhibit I King County Soil Survey 6688.001 [BE/sm] 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION The following report is based on a field observation performed on March 19, 1998. The proposed site is approximately 1.7 acres in size and is located in the Southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Renton,Washington. Based on a more localized description, the property is located between East Valley Highway and SR-167, just north of S.W. 41st Street. The proposed project will be to construct an 8$-unit motel. The site's existing ground cover is mostly brush and grasses. The site's existing topography is generally flat. However, based on the on-site topographic map provided to us, it appears that the middle of the site is a high point that slopes gently in all directions at approximately 2 percent. 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS A portion of the upstream can be seen on the aerial topographic map within Exhibit "B" of this report. The site receives upstream flow from Panther Creek wetland just east of SR-167. This area drains through two culverts running under SR-167 and onto the site. This upstream area collects within an on-site open channel that conveys water from east to west across the subject site. 3.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The current on-site drainage for this project consists of sheetflow that runs across the site from the middle of the project in all directions. However, a large portion of the site is collected within an open channel that runs from east to west and is located on the south portion of our site. This channel has a 3-foot bottom width, 1:2 side slope, with an approximate depth of 3 feet. Flows are concentrated in the open channel, which runs westerly into a 24-inch culvert that runs under East Valley Highway. 4.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM'S DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM SCREENING For a more detailed description of the following downstream analysis, please consult the Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table contained in Exhibit "C" and the drainage area map in Exhibit "B." The downstream runoff from this project runs through a 24-inch concrete culvert and flows in a westerly direction under the East Valley Highway. Runoff then joins the City of Renton tightline drainage system and heads north along the west side of East Valley Highway. It continues north until it reaches S.W. 34th Street, then it flows in a westerly direction. The drainage eventually reaches Springbrook Creek through the tightline conveyance system along S.W. 34th Street. 6688.001 [BE/sm] 5.0 RESOURCE REVIEW The following is a description of each of the resources reviewed in preparation of this Level 1 Drainage Report. A. BASIN RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT This site is included in the Black River Drainage Sub-basin that is within the Eastside Green River Drainage Basin. B. CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREA MAPS After the review of the FEMA map for this project, it was found that the site is not located within a floodplain. The FEMA map can be found in Exhibit "E." C. FLOODPLAIN AND FLOODWAY FEMA MAPS The site is located in an area that does have both a FEMA map and a Floodplain map. After review of these maps, it appears that the site is not threatened by any flooding problems. D. OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS A review of the basin study area maps and site investigation were conducted for analysis in preparation of this Level 1 Drainage Report. E. SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIOS Each of the sensitive area folios associated with the site were reviewed. After review, it was found that our project incorporates no sensitive areas. F. SWM DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION SECTION PROBLEM MAPS No drainage complaints were available from the City of Renton for this project. 6.0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOILS SURVEY The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soils Survey for King County has been incorporated into this report and can be found in Exhibit "I." 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS Wetland Inventory maps were reviewed for this project and it was found that no designated wetlands are located in or adjacent to this project. 6688.001 [BE/sm] 8.0 CONCLUSION The downstream area for this project appears to have no drainage-related problems. Based on our field inspections, it appears that there are no erosion problems. If designed in accordance with City of Renton design standards, we anticipate no surface water runoff problems and mitigation should not be necessary. 6688.001 [BE/sm] EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP .i.„... 4:'z1'';4-14''•.:1'„4.,3,,-"1_6i.',4 y,,-,..,4',0,.,.*I., ,I.1,_4 1;1,.1:11.irs• _•,-•,_?;•-,f,,....:-..r,:.-4..0•.s 1.4-l4i,t1.s•-371•..-,i••...i.i4,”r*.e'•-'r',;-;••t-ts-, ,Orr,t..4ifl-p;•.*"1'",V4't.`P"‘::rs.-it tr-.4a. ‘e.,,,0. 0.,0,-,`7:,.,'1,..•—.*.,.--'..a.,2.,h,!.tL.i•v.v,„OraMe A-.tr._.• 1›-,,._.,i r‘—:..•-,,•t....--,A''.-i 1i.. ..k--.,- SEE - --- PYRIHa 1 ,1m1i 9 655 , , . 4Tr4 6 , ',1t7°w,; I, L1---i•.:'4' si . , - .it.IWA le-,,•.A>„,,- ti7oivei-7- ,0-- ••4 ir,-1•Wti'n ••... A' ''' ' .'"I'' • n• Ng; Et.N.110". msore .niNI,A.P7V2 ' ,'A.i'lliel•rAl . •A',-- ti.' ' '14 eard4,1.1...wia ....*-.. +A 1 ,.b.VAl.r.... ",07:414e4 ,...A.1 •..gx PA . ., Y-,- ..,,,, ,mli , ,., . .4,s; 0 'or. turrit-...„.„ .-t.a!, 47.14- 4R5 ,' ;',- !Ict - '71: :0\4. , 7 t f t ,'1'1111.14 , 4 w 4 .117p1111,1 t.. ...,,,,- •2 • 4 Co" ihtica. .1! i 4 .L41:::•••44:1 • 41"4,-7'-}' , i•t-*I''' '...' . ' "'I , . ,, , ,,,,:. :Atria MIMPII 'c:A2 4*•41): ...;` . '. t:3-.1,,./1.-oky ,,',-:,', ,;,..:;:cps 444p*.i4'm.. , , , ., . v.:: 44;4 g""r_...) - ...-ZMIZEIlnii5Pg: 47 : Jr 1 . '''WSittj''4)vi.„‘ .4.kre„,'•!>..,I..-• -,..c.-!'g ; 7 4,••• ; .... .- .,- r -2x,_4„....,,:.T.,,/•.. '41,,,,,r,;,4,41...,_,_ ., 7i:.%.6y'i.....,,,..,a,",‘",,47,::. RI:. 4• , ...P.,: .,. , .:.., k 3.1.1thittplirrl-mi, .,,,,:. 1, ..... ,_ 0-0.:r,..s7,.,14.7-3; ' 3'... ins,:',..r'',. .1.--vaity.•r.4 rt'A(''''''' •1 .' Al 11,111L ''' ,,,':.14. ', tAllie-A,11biLl.--":31223a g 1 :1- .. =NM - - - -• • v-.Illie ,..eat• 1 („,,, , .0, ; -44 ' '44.44......,k,..,,,, t "4"444jit4. -t, • J.D.' N....ri \-,,,,,:-: .. -,..1...,.,, .. .,,, , , PArgia 1[7 '„_V- ..,• Ilt,r44-.r Iri - 41' —--r...4-7:,,, : 4 1!L'''',-- --":• e.... .Isiiiiillh I •„. ',, 4,-.., 'ai. MgfillE, :arb: .0. 6 , ,-,..!..1- N III)/s,,‘IMIMMMMIIIIMIIIIII2Ei MEN fi,:;', 44,.A. A:A.' • ''. '--t-1., t1.3.-Aho '0',0„ 1,.• ;... iz,43„ nog.114 1 -.;t• IrreekiklEawmili n'sm 6 hCofy": 1. ••••• •• •%-,--AVW Mitteslik 4.i..cq.-:" -, -- ..........t, . 11 , . _Cl, 'Le---.' , ,„ WArit',.V.0 elk,4:kill/yr., "Ilir-IMCG Ai •:"'"7"114 *r.;II 1 *Ali s ... iiiie....1.4 , WWI.Ai/Z . ' 4,, Fg."' _- 7, Ar---my •--..7.; , --...- ,,,,•it, ki.,. . 0--.1-7...A. ..\ -LI. .-., ' lovIrir Paola! .,,... , e; ..,/ - ' . • __-, - %.4..;.•Obi :,- -•a,,., , ':t:-..,..A......•--... ..,y.--77 MIMI .N3,•,1-;,-.7-1 .., 40-3 ,14114 'till"' .-Sfz,...s. •:$$2 g', 1.•••‘,...z. ,,, ,31:1-017.7.__.._EK-11.\12. milizzriumvi$3,,:u7rhalai%,,zitat,', 1 •...:. r',1, mil '-11-Aft13.11, •.. .•L;.s •; '• il ; • •A,‘..4.. ,Ii.`'Aj...:1.224.-111 e 4" •.m... mgoikCIPMNIDIN LIK.8Arszy,/,_,. .417. ...ttilintyto In< ... I ,, ••liNe,,. - Iiilliallins tiptm!i;iesAra 31A„,,,.,,, IF. 14- rejg47011,. 14tIqltlio - 3 r-. ' •• - . •,.... \...-: M -;-,1 4 ki.,..-• r 4'• ,o. r... Y.- ,:,,,,,, o... ...t.ift-44:-..• ...,56., litt &,,,,-,,. -. 6.--irz...manada,..,________ , alma'.4caiiiiimE,1=6,,,,,"•-•-irrrtmsa..A. 105114 A r , .53,_.i;., ',. ,..1,3y...Fjo-,,,,, •.", „",,'1•.".M.".,01101001001..mmv.• eS- ; ... s‘4",.44....;..-4111Mleall.... ......... I j AY.' SE ' *€ +411113111n#. IIIIISP ' I ir.4 1r 1:'';''''!-3.1''*-.7ailt=1:irrzgr.‘iii--7.,''4*Nss''4,42,'' :1=34.iiiizarraati E 7- '':' '?'-0''. 4 4 1. Av E 4 - A•• `I(-' 4.'4 .4 44^'''-''''' • C‘" “4: 'gi Ina 6 ``' '' ,, ....i; , ‘, .' ,'-''.. a , .,. ,111 1 N316600 ri 0,,,,,_*. 4.,,I., ,, .„.;,',4/4i .. -,., ,,17-...• '-st._7‘„:,....gimp!.r.-.2*„..*., -.7:,.-.:: ,.......ez,;`,... ,,,-....rolLa9 •„4-411,,,.-.0.4 AJ • ''''' aii• 4,.. 'L) 'h 4%. •,k t.r 4 k '4 1":".z4,-:,„ vri-464 - -.- -,O(MMI..:AAYY•SE ..1 • " A -!.,.,,," .'.•.:. •'',,',..;,s - ,v'4.,;.',v,,,A'.'f''..,:"*y ..4z;a ' -• •., Dn*s.;.'c•••#:t-."..,.r -.".f o;N1-14,*.-,q• I1.1.T.740.TA•9i 7•*i1'• 110 .... 1•,_ : ; :,..... . :;...;-77.,..-0:4-1...---54 itl. -.4,,-- .;-----. "--,-; p..-1-44it.:1.,..s4.,',2 .4it.t. .,•,,,,„;9• .‘ " .....ct*tio• ,...z.1, . ,,...4.. .4.tzt...: -?.. 1111H AV SE -4 4,19'M.', .--' '!.....tw-C,Lor,per.r.:t VI*4, ..141,1. • ..d:-.4 _ . ise.........,a, A.,.. wea• . A:,,, ,,- il..,.... .541 .Nr,--, •.,f,.6,k•.,---\770/. BM n •!.0:17""iNV":,_•_ .,„_," •• ....6,,,,Areq--..... "V . e 41,0'...arge.` 46.1. . `•,;-______„.A is,„ 8 AWAllir.- 4'''firli-4,10--..„1A3.1 pi tr- . ,•-•',7,-' .." • A.,--- re. 0.,, it..„, .%,."—w-i.. -4.P 1113TH A0 SE Ian AV SE 1.,"ktr-,, . CI4'41 yii- 11.-1. 147". • .* . I.: "' •i•ot '''' -- - ';'''''"' ' . ..‘'''''-' .-.., m - vt 4- 114TH Av V , • `. •': -tr i-I..-)1-Mg,'" ref 4e. ,. • •\ , ',..` .,...-.4.' t• . • r-ir .. - .., It 4,11.01 7.>"•'-1141--"tx L'I _ $E g It& La- '-' •• 0 -. /5-ig,/, f47:•iy, % AN. . N.) ig r ...'1731, 4 ,,,•• 1147TI AY SE`8 t- ' -3, '-'t4c. 3,,..1 • ,:. -.1.. - our ...... '..,01 •• -4, -— .- • -.1., CT/ 2 -..-1 .i. -4 v . ,,,,, .4 :-. '11; •...„.47 , a. .sr. ,....•t« 4. . / - - n.... 1, '.'; -,••••316, 1 .1, , .4.,.,. _ co , •••• •--- t 131 A A t-il • A , . „ t.. lir - , , :-... .. ..: ,,,,r,„z , _.......t. .-: ,..7, : _ 117TH AV SE,g : ;/.. ' fk s"ts. 4 E),„ AI - ,ir.,/,7:1•437 ,..4,•..„,,..„ ....,.t. i ../.,IP,- ...k.4 ..-.:1.,',,;.?• - -_-: :-,,t- P---.. ‘te.at'-'3.- A. t21,A 77M7.;,11,7-?ti ,, $ t AY E^.. ;:5+t4i'a- ,,•.44 r.•,/".,' ). : -• ..t.L.,-,.,-•- 1 t.,,,,,, --. --••-,•'.• 5=1‘,1"73 :::".44..-r.....L...'. ,te.N. k k11-1.....21' ..t.'Vt4.. ../".'„411.it' ..........-..,,t-ls ';'"(M., „..... .„,g 1 9TH AY SE fr.,MalL '4M/Fikr.1W9.11. -tt-b141 . •.i'l '-' • ,•1 EXHIBIT B DRAINAGE AREA MAP v H--.. .1 I i CZCi ) L., 3_---' I (I 1 1 I r- - . I I! . 4 :I! 7 I I 0 ;.: C 3 .• , ..!• / I . f/11, 3 3.3 it I i I , I 4 r.3..' 1• 394 dif , 1 1 ii, , . , .„, , ..,.. , , . II 1 I . /1 .. f i 1 1 4•V I , I r 'V' .1; I 1 L \,._, ) I h . . pi,. „. ,. ., , 3 , ,., ...„ . , ,:t 2' I 1 1:1 ". ( g AI .41•11,r1M1111 .1111111M..... ,si: r -F. x ,i,.., - ..... , ., ,., ,.. V k &-: Le s " , ••••............ es: ,AI il, Tifill , 1.1 Ilk , I 4.r..+• ' •,/ lq 1• ••,I!,' 1St di 8,.. PI ., . , .,•e• ..., ..,......:.___ __ •I.,' 1 el ' iiji if I 0 I I 1 •'''' I'II 1 11 I let 1 III it e , i 4 __,--: p. . i / /.. .3'3 , •r :0 PI ' II -I i;• / •...0/I 41' / il r/ i ),, 9 • s,...7 xx,. 7 I , , „..., f, Lt.., . . ,., (..___ `----1i w ,(.......,„ ,, , - ../ --...., vo, \ , ...,--------- -- , , w--, ,.. - ........, 7i." / I' % a .. ../ ' !CI 3.4,i • /3., , 'I II D cf 1 1 t - tiIL_____-------- ; 3.73 ro I •I. .,___-------.---- I/ i 1.„_______________________.-••--- /1/(f/ \•)%\stsi, :,.:4 . , , z/p . /1._, •• _______________-../ -3 / -------- II111161F17 (i!I . \S -I ..,Sniiir I III 4 4. li I .... t.,\ fik, It Iliiimsfes : 4------ ,••1 I 6.. • .i/ , //i r r _---- , , t ,/- / --- r..1 / / ,- - .•••. /'' , •• . .'', I ". I ' .•• I ,e • ‘•-..- --"------Ns / ,'"..* •"'-. , I / /' \ , ,-. I i ' : / 3 OP ..• ., _C.1 / / ': I I I ..., L4:24 r.. Ir., •- f, it kEktit it, U aII r...••••...___. i: /il // 11"..-.—'••or , f i Ariri ,IZglk , ' , „. .. / ----- ___:__------., , . ,-I I 1 I I I - L ( r j 1 , / • 1 i •` -. if/I % ‘ i . 3 \ 3 I, 3, • 3 i - . (-_ I 1 11 1 I I , ' I •..- i IP ' 11 ; I • 1 .1 ) .. ,. . .1,1i • I I.1I • . . . I:, • 1 • ii'.; ', ‘ , \ _ , , ,.." t• \ , . . ....„ f,,,(4/, 4..... , . . i • : — . . 1 • I ' 4 f OF RENTON • • , JRFACELEGEND WATER ... • i ,kINAGE SYSTEM ci .... .. SW 30th } , z i • • 1 +4 . : .......... -4 i .‘-•-i / u ' +4 i • 25,05.4 ..0 Cal 1 6)4 cc ! ____ STORM SEWER LINES • . 1.: 1 R=1 _____ DITCH UNES i 0 ci CATCH BASINS •. ) MANHOLES t DRECTION ARROWS SV.....3.4th,..$1........,..„., MI" i .......,.„4/1; ,.....................w...........--1/4t1.„.....-- .......thi_. CULVERT CROSSNG 25.111-1 •••••••• ................ ..... III gut-I , ..........— ......... • CITY umrrs - ...•.: . . : iza •• Cl) . : : .- ...: .. . ••••- ..„-- . . • .•• s.. . . . -.6, 26, \ sO .'" .• 1/ .• • ' "' \ CP ''.. ..... . • k.. ' ' • /.... ' . . . I ME R . . . ..-- ... A TORY INFORMATION FOR THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM . ..' . . . .. TIC ONLY. IT VAS COMPILED FROM NUMEROUS SOURCES. BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. AND SHOULD OR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY THE CITY OF RENTON .. . . . . ;PONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS* •VI4EN THIS ../-'•• IN IS USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. DESIGNERS '''..LD VERIFY THIS INFORMATION ,S.V.,....39.tb..S.t....; \ .• • • ..,.......„.....„.,..,... .. . - .- '10-1 ^25.18-2 13__•• " ..."w"....w.011.00-1.*"... .........w.-.......... C. . -..• ... >.. b., . ct > B. N. I ci II • 1 1 26,00-i . •- .. . . 1 ... .... ,. P• ••• • 400 800 • . 1 _ , CA Lakkkilia 1 . . . : • • ' . •••41.St••••St 3421 1 :4800 " xce-2 30.C2-4 30.C2-3 -. ..... I i '''''''30....De....-3. ;4 a' 21.12-1 • e .:../.../ 4 30.u2-4 i . 30.12-? W TECHNICAL SERVICES A ...: /96 5330 SW 1/4 EXHIBIT C OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Basin: Green River Subbasin Name: Black River Subbasin Number: .. : •... :>i iiiii. e : : . ``.'" :4 Symbol Dtai�a e�o� pen ' ' Ate : Coirz oa : SIo ;;; � is�ac�: : :: ; �t�� : : . . : . * V. :>< ..::Ob s>e...rvations.of Field ee e T e .144, ': :: ize .: : ` > : �eseri an : >:> ; fromSx€e > : . r� 1ar u > >::' .1eo�Zlems',;; ;: > Resource>Reviewr ar Res de;:.. .: iriiiiiinn r » >> <>':'' See Map Type: sheet tlow, swale,stream, Drainage basin, vegetation,cover, % Ft Constrictions,under capacity,ponding, Tributary area,likelihood of problem, channel,pipe,pond; size, depth,type of sensitive area, overtopping, flooding,habitat or organism overflow pathways,potential impacts diameter, surface area volume destruction, scouring,bank sloughing, sedimentation, incision,other erosion 1 Open channel 3' wide, 3' deep, 1:2side 1 At source None None No erosion, good flow slope, sandy gravel bottom 2 24" CD Culvert running east to west 2 0'-40' None None Good flows under East Valley Highway 3 24" CD Tightline 40'-600' None None Good flows 4 48" CD Tightline 600'-3100' None None Good flows 5 Open channel City of Renton Drainage 3100' None None District No. 1 I I I I I 6688.0e n] EXHIBIT D ASSESSOR'S MAP 131 M � •AiTo4 c►rr ./-.-,,,TS 0,Tp 17i,t EAST . VALL5Y HWY. L--a L2,.76 ,__, ,,s.t� t ,��.� _4P.,r'� ray a TY .c /rtirs o AP g4 t79-3 - M m . z cn r a r- o � ; 0) 4 O O (/)N is- D 04 IM.71 4,, M �� f 0) Cn iot0aO r2 j 8 5 ® c 201c7?. �c� % 1 lrO Zeta • 0) S,. ( PRi �} se ,,.. ... S. 22gTN. STA TE SR �67 ST 1 N k<E N FI V/ Y T TO RENT _ Iv0 r'ti'aA 7. /i. EXHIBIT E BASIN STUDY CC, O N W Z O a m Z I - r? AIN, I 30 -CITY OF RENTON _ \ KING COUNTY CORP( NOTE: MAP AREA SHOWN ON THI TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EA K yo ,� SIT ; �= s UNINC( H v STREETT Ff "� SOUTH nm STREET \ all Ow4• —f w sr REET 1)7rN mp Z ". UJ Q S 1781H vf,-, I . -r*ET ZG F cr O tit G� STREET ti� y �� �� yOJ �P CITY OF RENTON T f�f— — CITY OF KENT 31 is; / ZONE AH (EL 18) j CITY OF RENTON ° 530088 0 RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 14 BLACK RIVER BASIN JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington P:BR.TOC/mlm King County Executive Tim Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District 5 Bruce Laing, District 6 Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Department of Public Works Parks, Planning and Resources Don LaBelle, Director Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division Natural Resources and Parks Division Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Russ Cahill, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Dave Clark, Manager, River & Water Derek Poon, Chief, Resources Planning Section Resource Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project Management and Design Section Contributing Staff Contributing Staff Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Randall Parsons, Sr. Engineer Matthew Clark, Project Manager Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Robert R. Fuerstenberg, Biologist & Team Leader Bruce Barker, Engineer Matthew J. Bruengo, Geologist Arny Stonkus, Engineer Lee Benda, Geologist Ray Steiger, Engineer Derek Booth, Geologist Pete Ringen, Engineer Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker, Earth Scientist Di Johnson, Planning Support Technician Robert Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Bentler, Planning Support Technician Consulting Staff Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon Clausen, Planning Support Technician Don Spencer, Associate Geologist, Earth David Truax, Planning Support Technician Consultants, Inc. Brian Vanderburg, Planning Support Technician John Bethel, Soil Scientist, Earth Carolyn M. Byerly, Technical Writer Consultants, Inc. Susanna Hornig Technical Writer Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNulty, Typesetter Mildred Miller, Typesetter Jaki Reed, Typesetter Lela Lira, Office Technician Marty Cox, Office Technician P:CR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN 2 A. Overview 2 B. Effects of Urbanization 4 C. Specific Problems 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 7 A. Expand existing and/or construct additional R/D facilities 7 B. Preserve wetlands on plateau to provide natural storage 7 C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides 7 D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along valley floor 7 E. Enforce prohibitions against dumping domestic trash 7 F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management 8 V. MAP 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Estimated Costs A-1 APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Projects Rating List B-1 APPENDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 P:I3R.TOC/mIm SUMMARY Black River Basin, located in south King County, is named for a river that ceased to exist in 1917. after major alterations to river systems were made to build the Lake Washington ship canal. The reconnaissance was conducted along the streams and tributaries still remaining in this basin. Development in the basin in and around the cities of Kent, Renton, and Tukwila has produced extensive areas of impervious surface, which are expected to double by the time the basin reaches its development capacity. Storm runoff from impervious surfaces is drained through pipes and discharges in some cases directly into the stream system. Field investigation of problems in the Black River Basin revealed that volumes and rates of stormwater flows have contributed to serious acceleration of erosion of streambanks and lower slopes and have produced downcutting and landslides in some places. Sedimentation resulting from these processes has, in turn, clogged existing conveyance systems, rendering many of them ineffective, and destroyed fish habitat for spawning, rearing, and migrating. In addition, the general inefficiency of the basin drainage system has increased the potential for flooding. Another problem cited was visibly poor water quality resulting from large amounts of domestic trash placed in streambeds and from commercial/industrial runoff, particularly near the Longacres Racetrack in Renton. Recommendations for action in the Black River Basin include: 1) expanding R/D facilities and preserving wetlands to assure adequate stormwater storage, 2) taking measures to protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides, 3) reducing sedimentation on the valley floor with sediment traps, 4) increasing enforcement of regulations against the dumping of trash into streams, and 5) increasing the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the basin through doing more maintenance of facilities, continuing intergovernmental agreements, lowering volumes and rates of release for stormwater, and other measures. II. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -- Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -- in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recom- mend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important ele- ment of surface water management. The goals of the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con- ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in deve- loping more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion problems: instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as • P:BR/Ir 1 Black River Basin (continued) descriptive environmental narratives rather than as final engineering conclusions. Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mitigative measures for each particular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmental protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate extent of such measures will be decided on a case-by-case basis by County offi- cials responsible for reviewing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among com- peting projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis for any proposal. )III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN The field reconnaissance in Black River Basin was conducted in February 1987 by Ray Heller, resource planner; Ray Steiger and Doug Chin, engineers; and Matthew J. Brunengo, geologist. Their findings and recommendations are presented here. A. Overview of Black River Basin Geographic and land use features. Black River Basin is generally bounded on the north by the cities of Renton and Tukwila and on the south by the city of Kent. The western and eastern boundaries are formed by the Green River and 116th Avenue SE, respectively, in this southern King County basin. The Black River, which gives its name to this basin, actually ceased to exist in 1917, when the Lake Washington ship canal was built and the level of Lake Washington was lowered, cutting off flow to the Black River. The 28-square-mile basin investigated by this field team includes what remains of the network of tributaries that formerly connected with the Black River. The Black River Basin is split nearly equally into an eastern upland plateau and a western floodplain in the Lower Green River Valley along State Road (SR) 167. The floodplain is almost wholly contained within the cities of Tukwila, Renton, and Kent, where extensive development in the last two decades has changed the landscape from a rural farming area to a commercial and industrial one. While open space and farming still exist here, the area will be infilled, primarily by a combination of commercial, industrial, and some multi-family complexes, by the year 2000. The King County Comprehensive Plan shows that the upland area will he developed at urban densities. This transition is already in progress, with commercial developments emerging along the Kent-Kangley Highway (SR 516), the Benson Highway (SR 515), and the Carr Road-176th Street SE-Petrovitsky Road corridor. Multi-family land use occurs in the uplands also and surrounds commercial developments. New single-family units are being built throughout most of the eastern upland portion of the basin. The amount of impervious surface is expected to nearly double between 1985 and the time the basin is fully developed. This will require strict controls on surface water discharge to assure prevention of further degradation of the stream system, which has already begun to exhibit adverse environmental impacts resulting from urbanization. Other factors of concern in this basin are those sensitive areas occupied by wetlands, streams, floodplains. coal-mine zones, and landslide zones. Mostly located in the eastern portion of the basin, these areas have already been damaged by the effects of develop- P:BR/jr 2 Black River Basin (continued) ment. Details of the damage, along with suggestions for mitigation, are contained in later section of this report. Dominant geologic and geomorphic features. Black River Basin consists of the part of the Duwamish Valley east of the Green River and the western edge of the Covington drift plain, a plateau underlain by glacial deposits. Small creeks, which flow across its rolling surface, have eroded deep, narrow ravines up to 1.5 miles into the plateau. Downcutting is migrating headward in the upper reaches, and erosion of banks and lower slopes causes landsliding in the canyon walls, most of which are naturally unstable. Both of these processes are accelerated by increased flows attributable to urbanization. Sediment is deposited where the streams flow onto the valley floor. The surface of the Covington drift plain is dominantly basal till, mantled in places with recessional outwash or deposits of post-glacial lakes. Near the edge of the plateau are several lenses of sediment deposited adjacent to a glacier lobe in the Duwamish Valley. Older sediments are exposed in the ravines and bluffs. In the north, unconsolidated sediments lap up onto the southern limb of the Newcastle anticline; sedimentary and volcanic rocks crop out in the bluffs north of Panther Creek and form the Renton, Talbot, and Earlington Hills in the northern end of the valley toward Tukwila. Coal was mined from this area from 1853 until the 1940s. The Duwamish Valley is part of a trough carved into the drift plain during the last glaciation; it later became an arm of Puget Sound. A catastrophic mudflow originating on Mount Rainier approximately 5700 years ago dumped massive amounts of debris into the trough. This and other events, plus the deposition of alluvial sediment, expelled the salt water. Through the nineteenth century, the combined White and Green Rivers meandered through the valley. Near Renton, the Cedar River flowed into the Black which drained Lake Washington and flowed into the Duwamish. Beginning in 1906 a series of changes was made to these river systems. The Cedar River was diverted into Lake Washington, and the White River was diverted south to the Puyallup. The Black River itself ceased to exist. Geomorphic processes in the Black River Basin are most active on the western edge of the plateau. Lakes and wetlands formed here in the poorly drained swales. Where conditions of drainage and percolation are appropriate, small streams flow between the drumlins, eroding deep ravines into the unconsolidated sediments in the process. Over time, the ravines have been widened by mass-wasting of their walls (a process aided by groundwater) and erosion by tributary creeks; their upper ends have migrated their upstream into the plateau. Sediment carried by these streams was deposited in the Duwamish trough; after the trough became an alluvial valley, small fans formed on its edge. Hydrologic and hydraulic features. There are three distinct geographic features asso- ciated with the hydraulics of Black River Basin: the plateau east of the Lower Green River Valley, the steep (5-35°) erosive hillsides, and the flat floodplain of the valley floor. Mill, Garrison. Springbrook, and Panther Creeks, as well as three small, unnamed tri- butaries (0023, 0006B. and 0006C), all originate from locations on top of the plateau. Panther Creek oriprinat. . !,om Panther i.a!:: and the s u•r undiv wetlands. The P:BR/jr 3 Black River Basin (continued) remaining tributaries originate primarily from surface water stored in natural depressions and wetland areas along the top of the hill. The surface water is collected and routed generally north and west via natural swales, open roadside ditches, culverts, and pipelines within street rights-of-way and, finally, down the steep hillsides to the valley floor. Mill Creek, located at the southernmost end of the Black River Basin, flows north between the Green River and SR 167 and then crosses under the highway at various locations. Mill, Springbrook, and Garrison Creeks continue north along the west side of SR 167 and eventually combine as Springbrook Creek before being pumped into the Green River through King County's Black River pump station. Tributaries 0006B and 0006C flow north independently down the hillside adjacent to Interstate 405 and into Renton, where they enter the city's storm drain system. Habitat characteristics. The use of natural streams for urban stormwater conduits has had a detrimental effect on most stream systems in the Black River Basin. Increased stormwater release rates that are higher than streams can convey without problems have resulted in extensive erosion, sedimentation, and landslides. Water quality problems caused by domestic garbage placed in streams and point discharges of pollutants-are additional factors. What is striking about this basin is that these habitat problems exist everywhere. While some problems are worse than others, their impact on the fish habitat of each stream examined was profound. No fish were observed in any streams during the investigation. For this reason it is surprising that the fish counter at the Black River pump plant located on Monster Road (through which all water in the basin is discharged into the Green River recorded 84 fish entering the stream system in 1986. While this figure is higher than that for fish counts in the previous five years, it is significantly lower than historical levels or the potential levels that might be achieved if streams were in better condition for spawning. The current habitat conditions offer little hope for the future of these salmon runs. To reach spawning areas fish must first pass through an open flood-control drainage ditch for a minimum of five miles. This ditch has no vegetation or pool protection for fish to take refuge against predators or water-temperature increases. In addition, water quality is visibly poor. The eggs of fish that do reach spawning territory are likely to be smothered with sediment or washed out during heavy rainstorms. If these problems associated with development worsen, stream systems will probably be left biologically sterile. Reversing this pattern of degradation is dependent on revising the policies and priorities in the planning and zoning activities, the develop- ment review processes on the Surface Water Management programs of King County, Renton, Tukwila. and Kent. B. Effects of Urbanization in the Basin The existing upper reaches of the Black River Basin were once heavily vegetated, and natural depressions retained much of the surface water. Water was released slowly then, and the stream systems could convey flows easily. Development has brought about the removal of this vegetative cover and filling of the natural depressions. Many streams are now being piped. Impervious surfaces are increasing and will eventually account for 50 percent of the basin's surface area. In general, surface water is entering natural systems at a faster and higher rate than before development accelerated two decades ago. P:BR/jr 4 Black River Basin (continued) • Earlier discussions pointed out the serious effects this is producing in the form of ero- sion and sediment transport to lower stream reaches. Additionally, sedimentation decreases the efficiency of the entire basin drainage system by filling culverts and chan- nels. This in turn increases the potential for flooding. The city of Kent removes an estimated 1,100 cubic yards of sediment annually from its sediment facility at Mill Creek Park. The Washington State Department of Transportation also employs a regular cleaning schedule to remove gravel and sediment from its culvert under South 212th Street on Tributary 0023. Sediment from Springbrook Creek has been transported downstream from the erosive hillside to a pri- vate trout farm west of Talbot Road and rendered it inoperative. Similar examples occur throughout the basin along the bottom of the steep hillside and east of State Road 167. Erosion is further accelerated by drainage outlets from developments and public areas. Discharge from a pipe into Garrison Creek adjacent to Benson Road freefalls for approximately 10 feet before scouring the ravine it enters. Similar erosion occurs on Tributary 0006B where water is discharged from the Fred Nelson Junior High School across Benson Road to the top of a severely eroded ravine. An onsite detention facility downstream at the Victoria Hills housing development accumulates large amounts of sediment. Its capacity is decreasing, and the function of the facility is threatened. The development trends in this basin mean that land for regional R/D facilities will become more difficult to obtain at the same time that erosion and potential for flooding are increasing. Additional problems may arise if existing onsite R/D systems malfunction from improper design or construction or from lack of maintenance. An onsite facility for a privately developed trailer park, located west of the Benson Road adjacent to Garrison Creek, exemplifies the potential hazard. Unstable fill was placed on the steep ravine and an R/D pond built on its edge. The fill becomes saturated when the pond is in use, and tension cracks in the fill along the slope indicate potential failure. Such an event would add large amounts of sediment to the drainage system. Development may create similar problems elsewhere if the proper design, construction, inspection, and maintenance of R/D facilities is neglected. C. Specific Problems Identified Black River Basin exhibits serious problems throughout its system, with exceptions only in the south fork of Springbrook Creek and on Panther Creek in subcatchment 10. The most significant problems noted by the field team during its investigation are listed below. 1. Stream channel erasion accelerated by the routing of runoff from developed areas into streams. Major problems exist in the ravines, where streams are cutting into till at the upper ends of canyons and associated landsliding and surface erosion occur (see section 3 below). Although these processes have been taking place naturally for a long time. increased runoff from developing areas on the plateau is causing acceleration of the erosion. a. The worst cases of erosion observed include those on Mill Creek (0005). P:I3R/j r 5 Black River Basin (continued) Garrison Creek (0022) and its tributaries (0023, 0024, and 0025), the north fork of Springbrook Creek (0021), and Panther Creek (0006). b. Prominent examples of gullying at drainage-structure outfalls are in Mill Creek (0005), Springbrook Creek (0021), Panther Creek (0006), and below Benson Road on both Garrison Creek (0022) and Talbot Creek (0006B). c. Examples of accelerated downcutting resulting from increased runoff from developing areas are located in Talbot Creek and two small streams (0064A and 0006C) in Renton. 2. Landsliding associated with stream erosion in ravines, as a result of steep slopes and saturated soils. Instability generally takes the form of rotational failures or debris slides triggered by stream undercutting. In many cases, natural instability is exacerbated by filling and/or by construction on canyon walls; for example, a new fill above Garrison Creek at Benson Road is failing, and old fills are being under- cut. All of the ravines should be considered landslide-hazard areas. The same is true of the bluffs at the western edge of the plateau, even though there have not been many problems yet. These are moderate to steep, landslide-susceptible slo- pes, especially in the northern (Renton) and southern (Kent) ends of the basin -- the area under the most development pressure. 3. Damage to (or destruction of) habitat due to: a. High flows and high velocities, which remove macrophytes and benthic orga- nisms, plants, insects, and possibly fish. Visible evidence of high velocities was noted on all the streams in this basin except the south fork of Springbrook Creek. b. Sedimentation from excessive erosion, which is filling pools, choking spawning gravels, and in some cases filling stream beds to the point of making channels impassible to fish. All of the four big stream systems in Black River Basin exhibit this problem. The Kent parks department annually removes 1,100 cubic yards of material from Mill Creek. A large sediment flow has filled the Springbrook Creek stream channel to a depth of approximately 5 feet, and Panther Creek just north of Valley General Hospital has a large alluvial fan. c. Visibly poor water quality: 1) Large amounts of domestic trash have been deposited in these stream canyons. Mill Creek has become a dump for appliances at river mile 9.60, and Garrison Creek appears to be more of a landfill than a creek at 1.30. Such practices have a detrimental effect on water quality as well as the visual quality of the environment. 2) Commercial and industrial enterprises are producing runoff that causes many streams to be oily, turbid, and sudsy. Springbrook Creek (Trio. 0005 at RM 1.30), flowing under the bridge of Southwest 16th Street just east of Longacres in Renton. is one of the worst examples noted. The Western Processing facilit% just upstream has been identified as a source of toxic wastes entering both surface and rroundw!ter systems. P:BR/jr 6 Black River Basin (continued) IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION Habitat, erosion, landsliding, and flooding problems in the Black River Basin can be addressed by the measures identified below. Most of the solutions listed here will mitigate specific problems observed during field investigation or will prevent similar problems in the future. However, additional recommendations have been included to suggest administrative or regulatory measures that would increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in this basin. A. Expand existing and/or construct additional regional R/D facilities on the plateau in order to control storm flows that originate there. Site facilities upstream of the four large creek ravines that are experiencing the worst damage. Facilities should be regional in scope and should follow the general specifi- cations outlined in Appendix A of this report. These will impede the direct conveyance of runoff into the steep, naturally erosive ravines, thereby reducing erosion rates that result in sediment transport and slope instability and that damage habitat. B. Preserve wetlands on the plateau to provide natural storage. In addition, reconsider Panther Lake for use as a regional R/D site. Although the lake has been classified as a #1-C wetland, the amount of storage it offers is substantial with a moderate addi- tional (.25-to .50-foot) fluctuation in depth. - C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides caused from direct discharges of stormwater: 1. Tightline discharges or provide other appropriate nonerosive conveyance over steep hillsides; provide energy dissipation at the outfalls. This has already been done at several points on Mill Creek (Tributary 0005) with good results. 2. Consider rerouting flow in cases where tightlining or other methods are not feasible. For example, runoff from the area southeast of Springbrook Creek might be piped down Southeast 200th Street rather than routed into the north fork (0021) as it is now. 3. Lower the potential for landslides by restricting development in and along the tops of ravines. In particular, strongly discourage filling along the edges; the fill at Benson Road above Garrison Creek (0022) will probably have to be removed. D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along the valley floor in cases where sedimentation is not adequately prevented by R/D and other upstream measures. In extreme cases (probably including Panther Creek [0006D), construct sediment traps (with convenient access for removal of accumulated material) at points where streams flow onto the valley floor. E. Increase enforcement of regulations against the dumping of domestic trash into ravines and stream channels. The Seattle-King County Health Department and the King County office of Building and Land Development should he asked to investigate this ongoing problem and to take appropriate action when violators are identified. I':BR/jr 7 Black River Basin (continued) F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the Black River Basin: 1. Continue cooperative intergovernmental arrangements between the cities of Tukwila, Kent, and Renton; the Washington State Department of Transportation; and the King County Surface Water Management Division to identify and propose solutions to habitat and hydraulic problems in the basin. These efforts should include de- veloping cost-sharing agreements where capital improvements are required. 2. Evaluate and reduce, if appropriate, the volumes and rates of release for stormwater originating from developments. Present release rates and volumes are causing erosion, sedimentation and habitat problems. 3. Increase the maintenance and inspection of existing King County and city drainage systems to ensure that they are functioning properly. 4. Encourage public participation in maintaining water quality and in stormwater management in the basin, including citizen action projects to clean trash from streams and education about citizens role in maintaining clean water and stream systems. 5. Perform more detailed and comprehensive hydrologic/hydraulic analysis of all drainage systems within the basin to determine how the existing facilities will function under existing and future flows. 6. Prepare a comprehensive basin plan with participation by all agencies concerned with surface water management in the basin. The plan should assess the econo- mic, hydrologic, and habitat impact of individual projects on a basin-wide scale. P:BR/jr 8 BLACK RIVER BASIN .,...........• Basin Boundary Subcatchment Boundary O, � O 00 O Collection Point o -.' \°o0, Stream4 0006 Tributary Number `' o 00301 Proposed Project rn 0006 p `O N 0006A 4-ati' 00 .II•i• - -_ 9 ID o� July, 1987 COQJ O,c -... ";w °0 el Coo ye"' 30 0 0301 _d i - �/ 0014 i ..a. 03s' o S,. 0023 0012 r -44n., 030 . D AA,. .t, 1) ty- o ke.� 0 1 i'n• 0 03Q5(5%\Th (� o� o,, 4 8 n 00 01 � K �`f 9.0 7 APPENDIX A ESTIMATED COST: PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BLACK RIVER BASIN * Indicates project was identified by Surface Water Management office prior to reconnaissance. NOTE: All projects are located on map included in this report. Project Collect. Estimated Costs Number Point Project Description Problem Addressed and Comments 0301* 10 Increase R/D capacity of Panther Reduce erosion and flooding $345,000 Lake by constructing earthen downstream in Panther (Panther Lake is #1 berms and outlet control Creek. Wetland and will require structure. Trib. 0006, RM 3.40. agreement to use as R/D site. Further biological study also needed at time of basin planning.) 0302* 22 Provide regional R/D facility by Prevent erosion to sensitive $208,000 constructing earthen dam across slopes downstream of (Project costs should drainage swale. Provide control proposed site by be shared with City structure and overflow spillway on reducing peak flows. of Renton.) Trib. 0021 at RM .40 (Springbrook Creek). 0303* 29 Construct instream R/D facility at Reduce erosion and flooding of $125,000 point where Benson Rd. crosses of Garrison Creek by reducing (Project should be Garrison Creek. Reinforce peak flows. constructed in conjunction Benson Rd. Construct outlet-control with proposed Projects structure around existing cross 0304 and 0305.) culvert R.M. 1.40. P.BR.AI'A/mlm A-1 Project Collect. Estimated Costs Number Point Project Description Problem Addressed and Comments 0304* 2 Construct instream R/D facility in Reduce erosion and flooding of $151,000 Garrison Creek. Construct dam across Garrison Creek by reducing peak (Wash. State Dept. of existing ravine with outlet control flows. Transportation has cost- structure and overflow spillway. sharing agreement with King Provide for fish passage. (Trib. County and the city of Kent. 0022, RM 1.0.) Coordinate with Projects 0303 and 0305.) 0305* 30 Construct R/D facility. Install Reduce erosion and flooding $116,000 proportional discharge outlet downstream in Garrison Creek (Construct in conjunction and overflow spillway. Excavate by reducing peak flows. with Projects 0303 and 0304.) to existing streambed level and provide earthen berms around site. (Trib. 0024 at RM .30.) 0307* 19 Construct regional R/D facility in Reduce erosion in Mill Creek and $309,000 Mill Creek Wetland 8 (rated #2). prevent downstream flooding. Construct berms around north and west sides to increase existing capacity, and provide an outlet control struc- ture. Enhance downstream conveyance capacity and stabilize channel with dense native vegetation. Provide habi- tat enhancement to maintain existing wetland values. 0 309 27 Construct an instream R/D facility Will reduce flows that $26,000 in sewer line right-of-way adjacent cause severe erosion to (Dependent on the availability to SE 208th St. (Trib. 0023 at unstable downstream ravine. of right-of-way for R/D. Addi- RM 1.00.) tional cost will result if sewer-line relocation is required.) P.13R.APA/mlm A-2 APPENDIX B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING BLACK RIVER BASIN Prior to the Black River Basin field reconnaissance, seven projects had been identified and rated using the CIP selection criteria developed by the Surface Water Management (SWM) and Natural Resources and Parks Divisions. Following the reconnaissance, seven projects remain proposed for this area. They include one new, previously unidentified and unrated project. This displaces one previously selected project, which was eliminated based on the consensus of the reconnaissance team because no problem was apparent in the field. The previous SWM capital improvement project list for the Black River Basin had an estimated cost of $1,250,000, while the revised list increases to an estimated cost of $1,280,000. This 2.4 percent increase in estimated capital costs is due mainly to upward revised cost figures for securing or acquiring easements over wetlands and costs associated with a new project to solve a previously uni- dentified problem. The following table summarizes the scores and costs for the CIPs proposed for the Black River Basin. These projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below are those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: "GO/NO GO," could be answered affirmatively. These projects can be considered now for merging into the live" CIP list. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE COST 1 0302* 125 $ 208,000 2 0303* 110 125,000 3 0309 100 26,E 4 0301* 95 345,000 5 0305* 90 116,000 6 0307* 60 309,000 7 0304* 55 151,000 TOTAL $1,280,000 Indicates project was identified by the Surface Water Management Division prior to reconnaissance. P:BR.APB. B-1 APPENDIX C DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BLACK RIVER BASIN All items listed here are located on final display maps in the offices of Surface Water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. Trib. Collect. Existing Anticipated Item" River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 1 0005 3 Habitat Fish ladder through pump Based on the condition of Develop and implement a comprehensive RM .30 plant. Automatic counter the basin habitat and future Black River basin plan in agreement records all returning development, these numbers with all local jurisdictions. anadromous species • will probably decrease. Habitat improvement would be one goal (apx. 84 in 1986). of this plan. 2 0005 12, 6 Habitat Drainage district has Condition will continue. - Contact drainage district about RM 1.30- removed all stream cover the feasibility of select plant- 4.65 along drainage channel. ins along the ditch levees. Water quality looks very - Develop a plan to address point poor. Some oil and suds on and nonpoint water quality surface, also very turbid problems originating from the water. thousands of acres of commercial and industrial land in the basin. 3 0005 18 Habitat Large amounts of sediment More erosion, sedimentation, - Increase size and number of R/D RM S.30- moving down the stream and loss of fish habitat. facilities upstream to reduce 8.70 system has filled in flow volume and rates to non- all the pools. Kent removes erosive levels. 1,100 cubic yards of sedi- ment from Mill Creek at Canyon Park annually. P:BR.APC/mIm C-1 i'rib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 4 0005 18 Cieology Erosion in narrow, steep- Increased flows from tribu- - Increase control of stormflow in RM 4.50- sided ravine -- intermit- taries on plateau will cause streams originating on the plateau 9 70 tent hank erosion, slump- continued or accelerated (especially Trib. 0005). ing; gullies below cul- erosion. Flow directed over - Direct local drainage (below RM verts; downcutting near the edge of the ravine 9.80) around the ravine, or tight- upper end. Deposition at causes gullying of walls. line to bottom of ravine. mouth of ravine. Erosion of banks and lower - Remove or repair old dam. slopes causes accelerated - Restict any further development on landsliding in lower slopes the edge of the ravine. (e.g., around old dam at RM 9.40). 5 0005 18 1-Iabitat Left bank has lots of gar- Potential water quality - Remove garbage (preferably by the RM 9.10- hage deposited from access problem; since inside Mill parties who placed it there). 9.?0 road above. Right bank Creek Canyon park, it could - Increase enforcement of regulations is a major dumping ground be a public hazard. prohibiting the random dumping of of used appliances. garbage in non-approved disposal sites. 6 0005 18 Habitat 12" culvert discharges onto If not tightlined in a safe, Kent Surface Water Utility should RM 9.-10 top of left bank and has nonerosive manner to the put this tightlining project on caused landslide into the bottom of the ravine, more their list of future CIP projects. stream. erosion will occur with resulting sedimentation downstream. 7 0005 18 Habitat Good spawning gravels. Without increased rate and - SWM/Basin Planning should deter- RM 9.60 Protection from high storm velocity and volume controls, mine the allowable rates and velo- flows and velocities new development will cities to maintain a stable, needed. Most large organic further threaten this nonerosive channel. New devel- debris flushed out of the spawning area. opment must then be conditioned to ravine. meet these requirements. - Add structures or large organic debris to create pools. P:I3R.APC/mlm C-2 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations g 0005 19 Habitat Fish blockage due to con- Condition will continue. Encourage State Fisheries person- RM 10.05 crete and asphalt debris nel to organize a citizen-action piled in stream. project to construct a stepped pool or other solution to allow fish passage. 9 0005 19 Habitat Native vegetation Livestock will erode stream- - Fence to provide a stream corri- RM 10.10- removed down to stream edge bank and defecate in stream dor. 10.30 and replaced by pasture. channel. This will result - Plant native plants or allow in erosion, sedimentation, natural revegetation along and water quality problems. streambanks. 10 0005A 19 I-lydrology 0307 Tributary contributes to This area will continue to - Obtain required easements and RM 0.2 Mill Creek, which experien- develop and will contribute construct a regional R/D facility ces erosion and sediment greater runoff to the in wetland area. transport. Wetland 0308 downstream conveyance system. - Construct berms along the western now provides some RID and The wetland area may be and northern sides of the existing has much more potential damaged by development wetland. capacity. around the perimeter and this - Increase the storage capacity may decrease the ability of of the wetland by excavation. the surface water to infiltrate. Runoff will continue to increase and erosion and sedimentation will likewise continue. 11 0006 7 habitat Stream flows throuth wet- Condition will continue. If anadromous fish were rein- RM .50- land. No visible channel. troduced to Panther Creek, 1.40 Fish transit through this wetland passage would need to be cattail wetland looks assured. A biological assessment difficult. by fisheries and wetland biolo- gists would be needed to formulate a viable solution. P:I3R.APC/mIm C-3 1 rih. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item Riper Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 12 0006 8. 10 Geology Channel downcutting at Problem will get much worse - Provide additional R/D facilities RM 1.40- upper end; bank erosion and as development proceeds in upper basin. 2.60 mass-wasting. Deposition along the ravine and in the - Restrict development along ravine above 180th and at wet- upper basin. Ravine is edges. land below Talbot Rd. sensitive to high flows in - Route ninoff around ravine or channel, and slopes are tightline it to bottom in a safe, susceptible to gullying. nonerosive manner (gully at Sediment is filling a major RM 2.50). wetland. 13 0006 7 IIabitat Alluvial fan from upstream Killing of trees from sedi- Provide a sediment pond and increased I2M 1.50 erosion; landslides filling ment inundation. Little or maintenance or reduce flows upstream wetland and blocking no fish passage. to nonerosive levels. stream for fish use. 14 0006 8 IIabitat 3' drop out of culvert Condition will remain. Improve system only if a fisheries RM 1.70 under Talbot Rd with biologist deems the Panther Creek no pool. Potential fish system viable for fish. barriers. 15 0006 8 Habitat Two debris jams pose Condition will remain. Remove debris or improve passage RM 1.75 potential fish barriers. through the debris jams. 16 0006 10 Habitat Extensive bank erosion, . Worsening of current condi- Same as Trib. 0006, RM 2.55-3.00. RM 1.80- channel downcutting and tions. (See Item 19 below.) 2.55 sedimentation has elimi- nated most pools, fish, and benthic organisms. Both large organic debris and bedload material are active. 17 0006 8 IIabitat 12' waterfall and concrete No future fish access to If the upstream habitat justifies RM 1.95 channel creating fish upstream areas. improvement, then a fish ladder should harrier. be constructed over the falls. P:l3R.APC/mlm C-4 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations iS 0006 8 Geology Large landslide (transla- Slide will continue to Direct surface runoff away from RM 2.15 tional and rotational contribute to sedimentation top of slope to gravel pit failure), with raw slope downstream. (to west). remaining; gullying of slope. Apparently caused by combination of under- cutting by stream and routing of road drainage over slope from above. 19 0006 10 IIabitat Stream in good condition. Possible erosion and loss of - Maintain stream flows at non- RM 2.55- Setbacks and protective habitat if future develop- erosive levels _ 3.00 vegetation needed at points ment increases volume and - Maintain a natural stream corri- along the stream. Some rate of flow. dor from Panther Lake down into good pools and spawning and along Panther Creek. gravel in a few places. 20 0006 10 Hydrology 0301 Panther Lake is a #1-C Future development in this The sensitive nature of the RM 3.40 wetland that provides a area will triple the amount wetland would require precise large amount of natural of impervious area. The boundary surveys and control over storage; the downstream available area for regional the amount of water artificially system is in fair R/D facilities may soon be retained by the proposed control. condition with some exausted and the system Use Panther Lake as an R/D facili- erosion. The contributing will continue unchecked ty by constructing earthen berms drainage area is not downstream. Erosive on the north and west sides of the currently densely dcvel- soils throughout the area wetland area; construct a control oped. are further threatened outlet, enhance and increase the as higher amounts of runoff capacity of the downstream channel will increase the rate at (stabilize with vegetation), and which the existing stream obtain easements. erodes. P:BR.APC/mlm C-5 Trite. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 21 0006A 7 Ilabitat Incised stream eroded to Reduction of wetland area Consider tightlining stream from RM 10 bedrock above Talbot Rd. and values. Loss of flood Whitworth Ave. S to Talbot Rd. Little or no habitat value. storage. Two slides are depositing sediment in large wetland on east side of Valley Free- way (inside city of Renton). 22 0006A 7 Geology Erosion in short channel Stormflow is discharged rap- R/D and/or energy dissipation at RM .10-.20 reach below development: idly into channel from cul- upper end of channel needed. downcutting at upper end, vert below street. Down- failure of lower slopes cutting is prevented at throughout. lower end (by bedrock and culvert at Talbot Rd.) but will continue to undercut slopes at upper end. 2; 0006B 4 Geology Extreme gullying below cul- Runoff from Benson Rd. and Reroute some or all of the RM 1.55- vert outfall (below Benson area to the east is dis- runoff or tightline through the 1.70, 1.00 Rd.) causing rapid sedi- charged onto erodible sand erodible reach. (Problem area is mentation, especially and gravel, which is depos- slated for development.) in R/D pond (RM 1.55); ited downstream. Most of probably contributing to the coarse material is deposition at RM 1.00. caught by the R/D pond -- will require more frequent maintenance. 24 0006B 4 Habitat Drainage from Fred Nelson More property loss from - Provide R/D at Jr. High School. Jr. High School is causing unrestricted flows from Jr. - Other possibility is to pipe extensive erosion problems High. High maintenance the stream. between Benson Rd. and costs to dredge R/D ponds of SR 515. Large sediment silt. build up in S 22nd Ct. R/D pond at S Puget Dr. No fish habitat in this system. P:BR.APC/mlm C-6 '1'rib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 25 0006C 5 Habitat Rolling Hills Creek exhib- Little change due to riprap None. its oil sheen on water in along stream to protect upper portion of the creek. sewer line that parallels Little or no fish habitat stream. (or potential) exists. 26 0009 9 Geology Bank and lower-slope erosion Flows in tributary will in- - RID in upper basin. RM .00- in small tributary channel, crease; erosion will continue - Remove fill along stream. .15 especially behind construe- causing sedimentation down- tion equipment lot. stream and perhaps threaten stability of building. 27 0009 9 Habitat Lots of litter, stream has Worsening of water quality, - Reduce the volume and rate of water RM .15-.20 extensive downcutting, bank sedimentation, and erosion. to non-erosive levels by new R/D. erosion, and bedload - Consider restricting future develop- movement. ment (down-zone). - Community action projects could remove litter. 28 0020 12 Habitat Sediment has destroyed fish Possible flooding and sedi- Remove sedimentation source (see also RM .20 habitat. City of Kent mentation along S 192nd St. Trib. 0023, RM.95). removes sediment each year. 29 0020 21 Geology Bank erosion, landsliding Problems will continue. - Control storm flows. Increase R/D RM .50- in canyon due to outfalls above RM .40 in 0021; reroute or .70 at end of SE 196th St. and control flows from vicinity of SE from R/D on 200th plus 200th (tightline west on 200th). natural sensitivity - Provide energy dissipation at R/D (landslides). Heavy damage outfall (RM .40). in Jan. 86 storm. Sedi- - Restrict development on north side mentation above old road, of 0021 (runoff to be tightlined or and in trout farm below routed around ravine). Talbot Rd., as well as ero- sion in the ravine. P:13R.APC/mlm C-7 Trib t.K: Collect Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations O 0020 21 Itabitat Excess sediment from Further sedimentation from Several options: construct sediment ItM .r,0 upstream has destroyed a upstream sediment sources. pond above Talbot Road. Reduce private trout farm. flow rates and volumes in Trib. Thousands of fish were 0021. Increase R/D upstream of killed during Jan. '86 Talbot Rd. Down-zone land to storm. reduce surface water impacts of future development. 31 0021 22, Geology Bank erosion, landsliding Problems will continue. - Control storm flows: R/D above 12M .00 in ravine due to outfalls RM .40 in 0021; reroute or 0.50 at end of SE 196th St. control flows from vicinity of and from R/D pond at SE SE 200th (tightline flows west 200th plus natural on 200th). sensitivity (landslides). - Provide energy dissipation at R/D Heavy damage in Jan. '86 outfall (RM .40). storm. Sedimentation above - Restrict development on north side old road and in trout farm of 0021 (runoff to be tightlined below Talbot Rd. (0020), as or routed around canyon). well as erosion in the canyon. 32 0021 22 Hydrology 0302 The upper reaches of Development will continue - Construct a regional R/D faci- RM .40 Springbrook Creek lie and impervious area will lity in the natural drainage within the city of Renton continue to grow. Increased swale at the upper reaches of City Watershed. The creek runoff will further erode this system. originates in highly ero- the unstable soils carrying - Construct a dam across the swale sive and steeply sloping sediment and debris with an outlet control structure soils. Alterations of the downstream, where they will and an overflow spillway. natural drainage patterns reduce the efficiency of or - Tightline existing drainage into by development, roadway even destroy culverts, pipe- area to further reduce erosion and construction, and poor lines, and streambeds. raise existing roadway to prevent practice in handling Flooding could result from flooding. runoff have increased ero- the inefficient facilities sion and sediment coupled with the greater transport to the lower runoff. gradient downstream reaches. P:13R.APC/mlm C-8 i'rib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 33 0022 26, 28 Geology Bank cutting and slope Natural instability of - Increase RID capacity, especially RM .20- failure in canyon of . canyon walls is aggravated upstream of Benson Road. 1.40 Garrison Creek. Some ero- by increased flows from - Tightline flows to bottom of sion caused by outfall over upper part of catchment. canyon; provide energy dissipa- edges or flow out of tight- tion. lined culverts impinging on - Restrict further development on opposite banks. Deposition edges of canyon. in vicinity of SE 218 St. 34 0022 26 Habitat Large sedimentation zone has Flooding of adjacent proper- Reduce flow rates and volumes RM .30- filled channel and pools. ties due to rising streambed to non-erosive levels. Then caused by sediment consider habitat improvements deposition. such as large organic debris for • pools and instream protection. 35 0022 29,28 Habitat Surface water runoff is More development will exa- Reduce flow rates to nonerosive RM .30- 26 causing severe erosion and cerbate the problem. levels by providing more R/D. 2.30 sedimentation. Instream Stricter development controls by habitat for fish and benthic down-zoning development areas. organisms is very poor. Most pools are gone, in- stream large organic debris and bcdload are both moving. 36 0022 28 Habitat Stream has a whitewashed, Worsening of existing Reduce stream flow rates and RM .80 sterile look due to the problems. volumes to non-erosive levels. water volume and veloci- Then consider habitat improve- tics. These have created ments such as large organic debris a very unstable system for pools and instream protec- that has destroyed the tion. fish habitat and removed most fish, benthos, and macrophytes. P:BR.APC/mlm C-9 Trib. .` Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 37 0022 2S Geology Erosion below culvert out- Gullying and failure of Tightline to bottom of canyon, ItM I.10 fall; downcutting of side- sideslopes will continue with energy dissipator. gully into loose sandy unless outfall is materials. These are controlled. causing some slope failure in backyards. 38 0022 23 habitat Large quantities of Water quality and visual Remove trash. RM 1..10 domestic trash instream. problems. 39 0022 24 Geology Mass failure of new fill on Problems will continue. - Fill should be rebuilt or RM 1.40 edge of canyon; erosion of removed. culvert outfall; under- - R/D pond on edge should be cutting of slopes. Trash moved north. disposed of by nursery is - Culvert outfall should be entering stream. Fill was rerouted into a new R/D facility emplaced poorly is settling southeast of Benson Rd. (or toward creek; side is tightlined to bottom of hill). failing. Runoff from - Removal of trash from stream streets and development east should be required. of Benson Rd. is eroding slopes at outfall. 40 0022 26 Hydrology Garrison Creek experiences Additional development There are three recommended pro- (See items erosion and downcutting upstream and along jects along Garrison Creek #42-43 because of the step gra- Garrison Creek will continue that would impede peak runoff below) dient and erosive soils in to exacerbate the erosion flows and would thus reduce ero- this reach. Development in problem and degrade the sion and flooding potential. the upstream areas has existing conveyance system. The system would need to be further accelerated this Sediment load and erosion hydraulically modelled to deter- problem by concentrating will reduce the efficiency of mine the individual/joint impact runoff into the stream. (and potentially destroy) of the recommended projects. existing facilities. Potential cost sharing should be reviewed with the Washington State Dept. of Transportation and the city of Kent. P:BR.APC/mIm C-10 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 41 0022 29 Hydrology 0303 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct instream R/D facility RM 1.40 at intersection of Benson Rd. and Garrison Creek. Roadway would be reinforced to act as impoundment. Construct outlet control structure and tie to existing cross culvert. Check realignment schedule with WSDOT. Provide fish passage. 42 0022 28 Hydrology 0304 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct instream R/D facility RM 1.00 in Garrison Creek. Construct a dam across the ravine with an outlet control structure and an overflow spillway. Provide access road from SE 220th without increasing landslide potential. Project will provide fish passage. 43 0024 30 Hydrology 0305 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct R/D facility. Would require excavation of soil, remo- val of existing vegetation, and construction of berms. Facility would require proportional discharge outlet and overflow spillway. 44 0023 27 Geology 7* Downcutting, undercutting Erosion in this ravine has - Control flows into canyon with RM .50- of lower slopes -- extreme been aggravated by R/D upstream of RM 1.00. .9(1 in upper reach (RM 0.70- increased flows from upper - If possible, route runoff (from 0.90); box-gully up to basin and runoff from resi- development to south RM .70-.90) 22' deep. Deposition in dential area to the south. around the canyon to S 212th St. field at mouth. Worst erosion occurs at - Restrict further development knickpoint of headward along ravine edges; in areas migration (currently RM .80 north of ravine any future out- -.90) and will move up- falls should be tighlined into stream with time. canyon or (preferably) routed around. P:BR.APC/mIm C-11 "l'rih. ;; Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 45 0023 27 habitat Whitewashed, sterile Worsening of existing Reduce stream flow rates and RM .60- channel. Channel material problem. volumes to nonerosive levels, •g0 is very unstable. Little then consider habitat improve- fish habitat remaining. ments such as large organic debris Steep, incised valley. for pools and instream protec- tion. 46 0023 27 Habitat Construction-yard drainage Further erosion and possible Notify Dept. of Ecology and RM '): from existing pipe on top toxic runoff from private King County Health Dept. of slope causing eroded construction business. left bank. 47 0023 27 Ilydrology 0309 Large amounts of sediment Erosion and sediment - Reduce the rate of erosion RM 1.0 are transported from the transport will continue to and sediment transport by highly erosive soils and degrade the system and require constructing an instream R/D steep gradient to the continued maintenance of the facility to reduce peak discharges, lower-gradient downstream downstream system. using the existing sewer-line reaches. This problem is right-of-way. Increase storage aggravated by peak storm capacity by expanding size of the runoff and poor develop- existing berm. ment practices (e.g., - Construct an outlet-control development on steep facility. As part of project, slopes). The resulting downstream channel will need erosion and sediment proper erosion-control facili- transport have led to ties. decreased conveyance- system capacity and need for increased maintenance. P:13R.APC/mlm C-12 Trite. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 48 0024 30, 31 Geology Channel downcutting, bank Increase in impervious area - Increase R/D, especially in upstream RM .20 erosion, landslides in on plateau will continue to area of Trib. 0024 (where most ravines. Natural instabi- aggravate erosion in the future development will occur). lity aggravated by ravines and cause deposition - The downstream analysis required by increased st ream flows. in Garrison Creek. BALD for new developments should fully address the impacts of new developments on the conditions foun at this site during reconnaissance. New development that will aggravated conditions should be required to include mitigation proposals prior to approval. 49 0024 30 Ilabitat Loss of pools and instream Any remaining fish, benthos, Reduce flow rates and volumes to RM .10- habitat from high-flow ero- or macrophytes will be lost nonerosive levels with development .30 sion. due to the high, erosive controls and/or with additional stream flows. R/D at existing sites. 50 0024 30 Ilabitat Large quantity of garbage More garbage and increased -Encourage citizen project to clean RM .70 deposited in the stream. water quality problems. up the stream. -Large commercial area and parking lot runoff need oil and metals separation before discharge into the stream. P:BR.AP('/mlm C-13 '1'rib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 51 0025 30, 31 Geology Channel downcutting, bank Increase in impervious area -Provide energy dissipation below RM .00- erosion, landslides in on plateau will continue to culvert outfall at RM .70. .70 canyons. Natural instabi- aggravate erosion in the Restrict development along canyon lity aggravated by ravines and cause deposition edges. increased stream flows. in Garrison Creek. -The downstream analysis required by BALD for new developments should fully address the impacts these developments will have on the conditions found at this site during reconnaissance. Developments that will aggravate conditions should be required to include mitigation proposals prior to approval. 52 NA 7 Hydrology 0306 None observed. None. Drop project from priority listing; small tributary area at top of knoll; city of Renton in agreement with this recommendation. 53 NA 7 Hydrology 0308 Project completed. None. P:BR.APC/mlm C-14 EXHIBIT F SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS ._ 1 1/2 0 1 •� MILE ''... g NW. IP - ." ii... '.S77.-• '.: -N....'‘',..., ,':\N! . (..1.7;- ••. .aq, r 11..-.i ,t,Zifiellot igaikt,. / . I.,I* '-÷,-;11,.. \ . )1, • 31110114 .t. .. 2: .,_. ,V".",4ri- Thri. ',d0 ',Are', Fla: diot2)..:,;•/ " ' -'. Ii:'•IA '4.?..., tig ..r ?,.. - '''';,*:,,_-•Nt-,;oeii' 1gl • . .tea �i -� 1 . x..,.w,'-_ i!L 4. rt �igig _. • -'fit • i.. r; ■t:leY 3.! . (i Rid' C ils.:=10, L, • lS t ! ` Il e ��TTLF. T o .l •Y \)',... rw -�,:. w �i..`t .\' 1,•' f _� Jr'.:\ E 1-1e t E �; '"s ,. '�\ • ...".....V-14,,,„, . . __.„ ,, . i ,...; .. _ *. -..w>1 ‘: arTF,i112111/00all I • * ABAlk.. ., .. iiii- , AN,,,. .-.7‘4140,7 1-L-7:-..---?,-• •!>.' '; 94LIIIINNI. ==_P , 3'.,1.4. •" - . 11 sc.w?,...Alk , Elk.'..7a.11411rfli a .: z Nk..:\ flth.111;• . I>..1:,4f ij,,,,„ .9 B;,, 1„..._,...1 ,\\..„,....,,,,,,,,:„. v 1.4i,„.„....ii...,,r, .. - : . • .... . -Wt. TM 1 -: k \''' 41,1,_ ' .1101' t5..• N.' ' r.,Bri..k. .\."--;;es• `qui , r, ..,, ,,..... . %A 1 i 0 Ilk. \lite ii clint - 6-4 1-, ! . \1/40tii Jr.�- ' o 1111C"ri I %y �.• . , . .� t r. ,,.. . .-,2\ / _6,..,- ;tiei . ,, -. c 49.11 . ‘/ i;ii { /s` irt . qr M MZ �-. L.nQ1 -"(4 • T �• � I I ': �—a��-sol�:T3 \i sty`.' "'�7'. • Z'� -• ��{� ••. . ' ,§1P► lyA- � ?,r �... ■ �IIieM�y 1 rd/ '� � I� d . . , :IP Ni,s ::J .-fi ,.t. °•ki-liligalidl ..1- 7i•-':.". ---- --All 7# -AP iansirjekr,rimf 4) r -... -- I- Ittl itiaminreiteimuffleamteriti; ears ."..;..441: 7\71 I ..*11.CIN 1 1141111.11111111Miamq-\\''''''' VII .24111"If.,414111 es&rtiti WSW _ i , g ,ii ., ..j _ •••, et--:* -4A,,,.. :f,• Duwamish 4 EROSION HAZARD AREAS 1 ,/2 0 „ . —5"----iiiiilliklair--r- MILE ' •: '. '' : . / ;if II IT''''47111-1.A °aline' ' .,4,,,. --,1,..._. :,4.,..,. ' tti "---- 11."111/11ri‘Yt:. - ''-,:.-1 .-Iv= . :•,.-,,=;,,--. ,..,7-r.,,..,',.. ,,, • ... . .,,,,-, ,'.7 i.:,./.4„.7,dr..p..1 rii:11 _ , „, x.... i :i.,,..::.,7111* :. 1 i .,,, - .4".S' l''. Flit I.Plif 7:: ,. . .4iiir A i...AF.611,3•-% 7. Ns 1 �� saJ. z\ , "' ". litifts \.)1. ktillaisi`ii,ssv-t'., • . • -% f' .,:r' atiri tgl,!; J -A T. ,t •A n.r.at.u-._ 1' oval �/�� i/�l , �.. las, � , ' :,. !f ,-., s �1 J.„ ,` ' Ala"-';®bofi0.i ...a _ \ e T� ,t ur. '•' w Nr-m u� .• St �ZR11► ., t tor ii .e ii 1= ram, • •\ 1" ,;*, 4G2 it � ' �r . .. 11 \N.,,,141.4 ..niss •t. t;_ ''' \. Irk.',;',''1,\ •,\,,,-..11,i, ,_• , .. 1..„,,,,, i . :. ,... itink�' ,, �M _ • y i `tom sic it , �•-•• ..1'II I _e_ if .a.f(t itR. �oti �• �� +t• ��11111• ;!0 i,, til •/* ��Y '. ga II. ti P 11'� 1���11C ` ;gin i• =�� ��E Pm...- itZ41 ,..• 4411:1:4,4;4.-1'. ,....;. '..ti' • .a\,,'" !;.,e- • '.‘...--L,.:. - .-.... —.or .wakiviliLoiniiidwr407 .4.11‘,.,t''‘ 4`..," ••1...,.....,........ 1:. .p.sgiti ,:f j1, i..., r:(4'44 Alt • i _ . :.,/tke.raigt.-i-4 nr,.4ARizi;lif .. •:: A . .,., ..., . i„....,-___ II !, ,,,Fe --"•,1*.r .,,.. `.---:).------2. , tRE.:41.41431.:: ...*,,, ,iimiria,,r0 ---..4-_,- ,.. ,... ._.--;......14,z7...,..,...e.,,......--„, . . m Elm 111 ..... :,..0 , .,,,-. Ai; 4-.---..:„._,.7. ,„,....717.,,,r3,4teilp•-griiriv. -'.. N,. ' 7...11FAly .-. :' . #0147111111L1111111 414\ ...--ipilk /• . t. . . i.,. ,...• .,,,,.. ..,, rAlb,,,„,, - - • 6 -,..--,,,. i, , .,....„.... .. . ._ ,-..-...„....„ ,,,.....2..}.111,......... ! ..--, : 'AIL& la jjHriii-Z*1... 4, • s, )i '..-'1•. -.....7'.j 1, . ..'••' :.-".:',....: .. .. .‘- 'i..1 '"is Ni....---.010-' '.. • .„..,.','„ I, 111 :, rill,, evab=ik..1 -110111"411•44.-‘1.1.f /.... . '..:•' . - ' •, 1111.1ilklm...krl',,:. r 1.- -- Ti\i' ..... , -., , 1.4. ,..st, Ifit. iota wrinse _.. ., tz.,,,..... :-.... .106 —466, ' • •,,,, ,, \:•—i /. , ,:tef:',4i ),1110114 sula.z.uail t,. 4.''''•..:.4' Oil •.', ''' 4"j' ) •-:: ;:;:--111111 . ''''''.7---r. Oil l ek .4:,,. ?( , `I i 1, v / 'O� +.ire ,,T ;C. ...... ' ' .;'4.K .,, .\, y ]'IS' _ flu ruramich A SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS I im 1 1(2 0 1 6imiiiii=61111111 MILE . ,-.1 t• - ; -:/;*a(1.! mal.-,•.:-.+; ::i. . ' -:,. ,'-'----',L- '. •r•is• ,."ti "' I • Wir.*.,?...,i-- ;I' II',ill.' . ..--*-V-., . . --__, „, _::,, :....,..)` 111.,1 •ii•,;‘:,.4..-:, ..,.t--;---- ..:',... ._Ns\_i:\.,., 21. Wilif i.. - . '1°21 INE -,•• 726-06,-/4-4ratr/411111glittltq':44 ,i Ric . • ...':;,.;/'',:z...'‘.--- 1 s'W**/ '/,' ,,,,./ ... .. i ,• •,n- .( '',.. "` l • r,a4;. 011.4te „A... r, it.,.., ..!, ,.. )- • --'.., . ,..,1 \t-,..J ;.....; , 4.-eiLy.irduirt to, ,_ •,, ii..--,..:f ,... i . : ... , .. •- ,, ..,. .. 4........7.* '' . • • tai r- telt f% 1.\ ‘ • . • \...,..1.‘..t:\ --. '.:!' :-"I' .." •../ .. \'IP_ • I . ,. .;.Qi.. ....‘ • i'I I ,i ... * ‘,%,,....., ILL-5/1.,::, ..,sia,-il ‘ . . 1211, r,..- •:•:\: .c,4,. . 1 • •-• s. -,%.'/it =• Vr air '''; I -1 f 111.6,11'•r• ', . • 1'''',4/ ,' frntlk i. ..'. ' ‘,40.1M > ' - • ::, . ‘. 1 , . ' -,-.1%.,e-r- • I , 'i":* tY•'•';'. '• :' \'\k's\;-,. , ,' .., •'\-1-WiP•,-(7-1-,...,.:N/ k-,r - -1;;. •-1 KAI- .,•\-, -2-' • ./.. • •, ...... .-. . .., r•p„, - -...-) '1 \Ai% _),' ,/ EAR IN:.• • .• ... . - --\ , \.,• ,.'s c' k Al-'=---"'... 'k.' ge . ., , .....' S • '',. . ' . ' SC ,_, ., . .k .. :......-ubl .• -_.,_ f,..,• / •. .r---••• ‘ ,, " -\d ss,.• ..) .- .E.,,....i -.' 41= '*-• -- : (li .-...---,,'••• ... •-'&0:---\,... ' 4,1‘.-"--•\,. Miir 114r4'4e Clikit ,-• c,„...,......„\,gr,r,mt, . I, ''',..- - ,-:! ...--_;;;;•:„/ ....s.,. ,.: ..,...,..% .•,1\•.(zz2......_.,....:: .... v...• ... .----- .- . .. -4--.. . 4.,-. i ••-‘. -, It 13 . •ki:V71b, . , • - ,s1....-. - IF. ',..,•:i II _ma -11\ .,:_ill'...41;11:i.‘1.1121171,1114.:\::::111:704 .'•,...-..1 C • ''' '.411113liklia! .4.--,\,...,...1':.:N., ,k., . .. ‘\, 9. III DM 6i1711 : r<71111.14_ 2111 • '-' ''' . ..' ' . ..''. .'- }V'. 1111111111i%0'011NoWp -\,;',,,,..- •1/4 '• -\ .:.''s. ' —. tl . ow . 4tt 1 .611 bilig .0. . .if.. . •-.,...,. . A , .. f.r.. ...,--.' - '1. • allkirir •117VVIP I ....: • %'.11" . •‘•1:. • .• iiiirei:.2.-1-3,E -t....-.,..,,t itF:.• I,:-,7.9.,:..- E:..-., / ‘,TIOrit„ 4 i filb..P.. 1 i ir - • ..,JCAKA‘ J' :-, , If hINS Ira lip k-.4144% ,---,-,---;, •.. ..„,_ .. -. . ..,,,;•- ,„. asEat i ., \.v1; ( . 444.AfjfiliFf N ‘.... —No* MI ',clitiR F.=.'"' 1-1\v, .•1111 iNli I.,:::...e, ort.... .,._ - .•,1 , .4 41,t- 11111111h, 461, ilipirk wrItune, . NW - -. - -"- -L,..\S_..,4r,..,\-.t'..\•)i,.•.i l.i_--ik•&„,•,e,v--i3rit1,14r.r...i a_k rfii-tffi0-4 4/0,)----n*A- ...11P0—im11111;e0i.43-,•. 155.17*=i41l),l. il-Li,,_eg*44 44'"t.1-a 139st1 i-1;1m\i;1 4-s,‘-:t 4)*'4 1144ii1s;i1i141ns1•1ar1.'1-n1,1,1',,,airr'/,Cl1id1 t4r 44'J';....,4 A 6,:i.,i.0...v.,-s,;...,.\-,-'-'',-2'-.,..-,:-4--,-•.'--'-.1.1.',.'--7'..,.-.4.„1.',•„-,:-c1••-v.2'r'':--. 1 iJ: t..,.-- 4,/... ( -- /__.----- -..• .0.04414A; -iok-siircia,110 -. a,' ,=,-..-.1 ._." ..-, •-r - .,- - ;'.. cm JIM -' r-• • Ilk\ - f.--• --r i'•/..• .....,..-. -,:-- ftri%. 0,,•loy„agliEv. 1..“ , ',NTAL.,- -.. • ,, \ qf----_-,:%;„/2'.?- illitipp, ti, _,.- ... '-:.,' .. ,,1 ,_,.. _4 .. ..lehie Int , \It.. / f . .:-s67 moo ph; -- ----,2- ; -'-•:. .,-• - . - • \ IN' '. \ - • 1 - i•- ------moorirAlls,-;?: 4 Mc=• i44...:.,-,;,. ,...-:. .":-.. tt,,,..,,‘,..„,,----,. •;--- -,.--, .4 ''''-'-'‘Nr) lift ' ;''''1'... \ itnWirirliling i. 4i1,i..-:.. ':. IC;.• ' .:-Aat„r b4,‘1,4b;,J4.,.-.1,..'.7..._--_.i0.-t' ._,..-_•,-,_.. • ,,..-;„4 4;.•.c%:L7{f r,--o.-,.l--i11. :•„-,.._..-".'.f\,..--\'--._-_.2.-<c1'""-'1I.,._:,,,../-,,,',r,-,',,/i./3m.4t"ii "v li..E..,.,f,,,f,,it„.f, ,2• t„r-aeiz"t p4d 1/4.l e.I,4:-a7.1s0141..•--1.4..-‘8.1t.,t.":.t!:.',...".2.-I k...a,I,._7.47-._(.....-;-...',,.-..•.-,-•--..,...\P„,..-\,7:i„,. ,...:.-„. -lNir V - '/,)‘... 1 it - 0 . -. s1_11 Tiitf mlildligiloli stir(rl!\-) i" 47 1 F-e.' r---\- , .... . . 4 6 milt y''..... 1 ' ,..-1 :',... ttN:iiiii11101;14:11,...,5_ - .)111sit\,(1. c..67.,-.7.....;.,•,,-:170 ) vuom P - . um& NIPP'- *...' 4g16„, iii iii Kalil:clam cp.... . I / PO ••‘ • . . )1 - - '';• 4k1P .„ .„ n.rau,....e.;‘•1, . ......• ''. ' STREAMS AND 100 YEAR j- Gass t FLOODPLAINS ._._._.-+ Class 2(with salmonids) Class 2 i perennial;salmonid use unc etermined) -""i` Class 3 Unclass fled 1 1/2 0 1 : •: 100-Year Fioodplalns lommi--- I MILE 1: ,lig, Ili - ' 1 1':illig eZ;*4 t''' , r.,11, tA. dlt `' 9 11iii,:::::jie J `` , r. • •.: �.. 7 r ^I"f7 __, r E a t�;'yer rl r� 1: IL4. IA '51INIA MIL , .; , ; ,. - e� . ., � ,.,.. .� • . ;� ale ` `, -r "P:-- ' 1`: ):` •. :1'. I, '� • k:: e-k'r-ti 1 {• i Ili ai0 AM '` ; v`f...- ` C' '\ :` :•\� .�' f`1 (�. J,, ' • `/i If� Sn•.M Ian �l� i t ♦ �,♦ti `_ • Ai 1 ;',:-;•..NwiL-4',-,-- c' t I $4`.- • .Q.' ' s• stinik .441. ---2., \'' ,.. Ifin .3\il: '.• Iii,vatal .,•-", 1.,.,%. N-3,,, -'.:0 \ \ 1 in . .. . . . \., !, .e '`.;-4,1t,.:- -".';"-.-".,•••.,.V,:-1::i-:.o"•.,••2..,k,,.;I ii i'0,,, 1`. gar. 1 �S 4,.j.,. iiI • '•\4 1 1 - ••mot Z`, i I. tI )it►' owsimi7 la-i, sililk` , ' .F: j ,1i;1 figii, 2fP`1 1141 l 4 Ali. '_4 w1\a`±k,'j`,'?,,.. i I S, `c.. • l i11.p 11 '3J111'm / .' ^ k _ .L� l.�'• . . • . �; '),$� �� _ .:41;,„,4a„r ..l��� ,� fit! . `;. , ::',_ . o , 11: kiwi, 1,4 4110ipt :;,,,,14,-,---7:1dm4illite.400i... ,--,.1 :.',-,,Fgf, mike 1r��ll � Eil eh .:` ,may.. ,. • ,,` �, ___ , .„,,..,_' °i"�pr ft y - ' �� �� .."'6-it ��i. + �i� m �4. 1 I t °=AIL -' "-, ;: °u. • `' as•.'_, ' ;; 1 . /a s'-,,• 1i., ` C= Mtb-ijAVtb,- :` - ej- `1_. I �� i ��`��l" , #row I' 1� 'i ii�1 t t ww �4c1 I _I .r►it i�9 �• .'�Rri�I�iname ow' r '` 7 ^_�, rs'` ..'�i � •fdw �GiU� '•"' 1 iiii I- b,. 'At U.-".. ; .\\■\75,.�/i1t r • ii teiv _ ii���lll h--., , in ,fir . 41 ,-,� f �,Nowronear ` 1a� o is jrig 8, , 1 ,, ' 'qs'�lb1� ‘ EnViiii - d ** G--. 1F;�� 111.3104 1,IIi ,: r .. —�_, , . ,�_�, me ram•. vai ; IIIIIIKUIN. •Ins extend be- C*,•met-r ',c• ,i„cl 1 (ll �� Dilwamish WETLANDS Wetlands - .1-`^- i— IM Open Waier ammo Basin Boundaries i 1/2 0 1 Sub-basin Boundarie `� immumei {s MILE �1 .oal Cr .47 z 44.• i • \ �1 I N 1P :./•-e")))l'. 4 1� i411t ' it � I _ • ;11114 'L' ' 11111,1 1 Ella alli-4' - NI , lib. ' _,..,-.--- L: • t'‘ ".\N .'‘‘ -. . i bails- .ry. it': littirs412110911 I. i IrY la . t ilk, '1' -. I 1r tit - --- - "1 ' ite . . . ___ .4. . ,..„ . ,, .•, ...1.rfi ii it .s. , , ,. _ titii ai. ....., it • ‘,.., .. . , ,..-t • . N-- . lle- , ---:4. \ ., 1.7 I .A-.. '''1/4-V.ile-'P"7" 04 i 1 1 ...t c ' 1,‘:1,‘ t t '.!I 4."'W e•la kit 13:-.) '"7 n,N.1. ..�4 a 1 � M I r 1• wir. r r•` . \� • :� rSrrwTV = r ‘,1,.;t.,:-;-.,,,:.. t .ft...._iliis"-""1 •.'.2:.1't...L.„.r. . . .,....' . .-7. :.4...:211.4.4::Ei\IN.1.15:41..4-1:1.' .*- . • 4\ , ' S', 't, ' ,.91114121IN\.... . . ' ' 's .' hOlftt ' .4 - - - "1i, ,.. --,t .k. 1,1115.0,4;%_. '-''': VAIC ‘--- ‘'''Ilii°1=1—is q :,. \v1 , , N--i• -- 1121 1A ' Nd . E k11?1$ 'dal. 44t, V..., ill ,. 1 Ei �u �t � A A, .g. ..,Y'1,7. 111214.ai„,Valligial.effill '. * "FAIL ., . .. .... ,,,_ , . 1 ,ai avierrovik - ;.,—,41.5, „ i,_\, Allefet..11 10.-,Amiraganale . \ i . ,,,,Er........ _,... . _mi. .. ‘ . ,.. , ,;‘ , , ,. ,..,,. „.,......, ,,,,,,- . 1........,.. \, „...,,,, ,,•_. r....,„...„.„.„._,,,,,...,_ ,,,,,,TT . .. . , 4 ins . ,.... - :car • 1 .'•, i fin" lf \71511.!`‘ :1 ABM M I,,:, •..7:-.! C2,1 61 • ....L -.. .1 0 i .- . ..._ f. !?4i • 4 4& ,NOms„4utikgligiigtirdve .--4. '?lei 1l ,,`�. , 1_,,:: cl•, a�. . -I, Ilk '/1 y „A1s. 0§111.111131.N - i -s' �'C6ddar'' ale' 1 1 r,P''‘•' IVAIN.P l �� 'Alit 1: rO, 1 ��� ►`„ `�,, I ;' !! �'' \ •� r L 1 1_ Air'''' - ERK7liva 'il .1rgaiu."...11114111! f, .4k �,4, ..► r t L, -.-. . r :$ T+rn* S. ft PA r, :i.„1,p4i,...,,,7 .,..1.,.g.,,.,,,,,,,„..-.,,,,,:-..t.,..-i-4,-,E,..,..4;:,..111....--2,..-,- -) ::-.:,,,,,,..0. 112iNP.,....04i--4.....1,0,.. ."-- ,..:,----:-. ... .k.. ., ,r4----.------- ---• -------7 _ ,-----L4' : ,,, %14.4.4.--.-_:_ ,s‘. :-.., 1 - . - 14,114 w4111 .A....... . ;---); 2 o::. I i., . ; ®®� 1 �.w.I a , = i *. � _ _ J i ail -%, r !l a f I `� ~ (�ii _.. «7 .1 1 L7.. . nil rum mich A EXHIBIT G WETLAND INVENTORY MAP ::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::';;;11.:::::1.:::::::::::::.. .....................,.......:.;:::::;;Iff:::::::::.:::::::: ;:e ^ :Lak_ a ::.:West 'Lo er Cedar Lt' 4' B 3II AS . NV . t Rnto .. 1 ti-,:.......................:::::••••••::;:-*.....:..*:.•....;:•:::::......:.::.:::::; -...-.......:.::„......:::::.::„.....-...... .................-..................J t P vq j.i..............:.::.::::::i..:-...........i..:.: "................".....::..1:-:. ::::.....\:::::-..1.1.1.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.......::::::::::::::,..::.:::::.11....c:........1.11...:1:-.....::::::::::-.1:-..::::::.:........::::::.:::-...T....f::. ;:Kent: ::.`::':,:?.:tom • :.f ::'' .: ::'. .' < •:� S.C. 1giNP <J•f: `4 . ' :1 ••�•.• ' • :�5 6 ‘,..., r: ::Black:: Rive •• •1 . soon Creek :: • i 1 �l f -::.:': :1 1...-: :::.: .. y........:-:":.--.. ..............:......:.-.:::-.......1.--...,........:11."-:::-:.:.-...:........1.1...........:......................:...::.:...:: :::.::::::::::::1.-1...:::;:::::::...........:.::::::.......:.::1.1• ..... 1\ .v.::: -: :. ............--::-::::::.:::::::::-......:::.::::::::::::.:1.:-..1.:1.::::::-..::::::::::...:.......,.............-....:::::...:.:.......:.:.....:::::.......:.:.......f....f...................:....................., • :.l w S: <�, tom"` :. l:• J 1 ,t ` a r• I;: { ::: :............-...'•''-'?.'`i.::::-........:....:. - -- :... . :::::..... L---.'•..•'•'••'•'••:•::•:i 1V1e :�: Lower Green River Mile N VirCBlack River Green River.Basin EXHIBIT H DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS EXHIBIT I KING COUNTY SOIL SURVEY SOIL SURVEY CountyKing Washington O \ GU % /\L UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with WASHINGTON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Issued November 1973 tts./1° r' 7 ,i-'1,i741.:144.3'...:.r'lh1;'. '1g1,434.11;;.4.1ase:e.a..14::; ;:a7.12t,41:....,V; # .. . lLL:ZIII.4rkitaiiiiiiie" iiellt.'1.ti 4'Iiirike4iJ,.,44;:.:i...;„.,.,. 44(... 'i'...:el•-‘.:•:.1::''....1!....::7 i 1.,,1 :tr.,tekki, \twe % j . .,,,,a, . , ,' ' . :.)),..*5-7,0, .. '.....,,r. '' .•:.. WA...ft*. '• • t _ • • ._ fl ay. . ,,. ,,., _f i....,W. .. y IV, , 0.,::.4.0Eril.;A14 i '' .*1°1111111i-ti 770'.11 ' I ."ikal',•,....,......:: v 7:t. "212111111:..7... •3 442r1Wrl ,, _,,:. 4;* , , ;,‘- 111.4.1, ,. .arri-m-1• q C N. * --Ftlallik < RI 440.. , ••• ,‘ ./..rillilL 1 ' • "''' ' .4 ..'" .21.14:16:°'' 4 '-' <11' . .t:-,,/,;•,„,,,, ----,..,... %_. . . . ,•:. i. 4 ' • t, ,..zArnc ,,T,4-,-.'"7: -='-' .-. 3.... ..- ... .. -- ..,`,-;', wf--A„.....w/j‘, 1., r- I e'•-• I;FlaliarillgMl.. "4' IV 1=, ''- ''' -,r,‘-. . -- . ,- • :- •• • • "*******. e. .-*f, 4., • •.:, ,,..Virn 5/01 .“ 14/. ' '.•:•_019, 06 , -----;. ...j.;sit.0„,,,g, ',..4•••02‘61.—""1111=215C'--- ildk. i ..- - -• :... u• ,,,, . : ..... w il t 4 r ' 0 [tir'... Igit;.....". .." 44.,. •I.:L:4....,-.77., -i-43,-,v'.;7.. , _ii,...NAL c i..,:,,,eff:i _ ii . , , ,,,..;,;,.`, . . —,-- ; ,,,, . ii < „fr. .0101".....t6"i'iP-.0. '"'"'' ci ;.A.-- •.,•,'''?-'•111•::.‘";:‘,/i.••••"..,.;;;-'":' t'71 ...7•;0•;:;ii.54:2,, . no."-,..' -• 4. 8 ' • -7 A,"- -;• "V •• • • .."i ••''' .' .• '''C */ 2 agr;• _--------1_.......5A 17,•,.-*.le'r•litgl.k.:02::*.' i 1:1:%.17.',:4::.5t141 N'As;t:..; cf' A 1..,:;;;•'' ''' - ' . ,..• it:' ..? a/ .3, • egy , . .f. • ..t.,•,. '''''plalfii:'',........ ,•!4:•:''.e!t•I'ti. t.,.410..,„" .t,---r.., •:i ••.: --- , •,..0,,A• r..-. <1.11-7A .;..7 ,,,,,, ;. , ,,,, A, .cii ir•• ,...,,,ee":47-:,. ° ••=-1'. -'• 1 - •' -Wo'-', -...t'i* sA e.^ '. ci;*.•1- ". X-• 6,4 ... '''';''4.. , z,,- ic '' '.11 . . . ir __%,!•,-•._ 41C 61Z-*.116:14 2 • -1 s 4 r- -.,. v, ../ 0,'•• '' •i:I. f.i.V.0414511-Wtil P4 .1,-,44,-; - .,..;,- . ,,,....- - ( . ...-4 .:;41-.4- • - ;--to ., -_,,I,w m 4t,q-0,40 ..7.4,4,-- ,„, . 1, 1:,:e.,,,;,.....: - •,:,,,•-i,4 A,- c•,1 eo At , • t-,,,;._,..t tli --..••• •• .. , ..,., ,„ .. t 2:_1.4 idloP1 Al'.1,7..•,,,`,1j*I.••Up • lc... ...s :,/. ----\,, ..J':,-- .. t• i.4 , - .„ • • •. 0-1-.- -•few , *4: '6,4 amrafloroN"- - t._.,"•• . . • • i''' zit, -••;:•.;.... -,1 _ . , . .n,-,0. ..,„ • s i;.. . • ., il l< ,.. 2 ....4 tA 4.,,.. . . -..,..-,,-., 1 ,!RM.:, ..?...,,...1...,..44.:Woel...-•Ir..... _._... „,,,L.,:‘,,..N.- xiCr, • . VI,..111).1 714,•..koz.),,,e4,•;•,41,,f u, // • • .. ..... .- k• \ Ix it1_0040 '',.. .....et.iy..141,,,., .4,, .,2...;:..41114Z.4.,t f.j11101h!...L',IT i.`,-,f(i,r4lc;*/!';"------___. ,,:, ..6•11••• : ••1,, Ii •, ..16 1 (••••4•-•.,•-,s....--,411111W ,.•1‘• try-f—Sibi. . og.,--s,...- •',.,..70"1,74.1.11:: ,„0 • ,, .... ." 4 . II/ . r • • , •..t 1 s. .4 .:.---;_____S• ", .4i...:1,,,,::54,46,-..„ 0, 1, Tr' 1 •.• • • •• • • . 4 iir7-o • - ...A.:F. .,., : # _ .....1/4 ,.....,•„11,..7,I,P.',-, Alks•rk' farhz ' •• :1:14,:.~•• tify - %;', ' ' •I - " : •..• • -... . ,..ots::Pi si ..1....4.45,--,._,.•-iii,. ,....,,,,,;::,..,,,„„, ,,,„:,71.4.,.......„ vt's .."wor7.0,-....., ,y,,,.,,,imiii:Le....7r,, , w j1.4.1:„..lak-"-!?.;4....1.7.i.'; ":::',:i'.' '-'2,4..a .t..-i •*".4' ...S :''14 -• ''':4i < • ' 1 I .44.'.1' . '.• X • ..„.....,,,e.;,,&‘,....:,,,..ilz ,,,,s •.1..0.4.41 ' 'L................._.- -...--•••-.....II"......4k•VroriirT ,,,.., F•49,.....„0•••• ' ' •VII...". .''.'•ork...t.'•:.4'rl.; .' ' .,pi••••,•,,E,C1,2.4.14. . i ,- .- .1't , i 11) .rt, •• ------7---. -,--"'''''W.te."..'r...dikini 1,1 -. 1 -, '''' nial. --,..,... ' ______.....--r....- . •"Ii,,,,. . .;.. ihj„_.• 11111311". I •.,. ,.• -....... - ..,' • 4C,'- f; -.? 41,,, • . ib• --,.._...-r„.t,.....5.,........,,,,, 1 1,,...44611111MMille ( .# 41". - --MI.: ,L•1r,t,i. ••V:2,-; .=,,FLt,li.441‘-...... tt„..-4.•••11:S. .._- 7-.-. .• 4, - i. ,.-..,•7t ti:%`'s,-* --,----- • -.... . ,... ro• .+NIL. . 4 -; 5'." ... -1',..-. .141, -1i -..T.:.i.- 'i:?-i?-,‘ ....'3'' -177'.." • aatt.z.„-a..,4,41. i!,.4:46i74:•1I.*,'ft'',t ''''',,,-....1 Li ,..: oda. -,*-- , ;-;.- ' :II iiii a , rq -..f.„,,...,..01. •,,— - 6.-40.,...1.i.c r..-. -:,; jiagE ...- . - . .1::..,-;..-, 1 2: t, 'f-11,1: t . ftik'nt:;:0;1, 4'',. ''.,,f-4,17.r-, • . , .:',,--'..., '! • • i iv: py ,....• ,. - 1....,, lit .65 *le, - - -. ._. t-• iD .... ....,......ti. m......„!... ...... ..„v:•!,-;v: ''.414i--4 i...Z.,... .1••\•••"` 'I' ';,--' i• „,., /. •,„ .... - _ 'ertit- k4:r•'F• '74.1'"...•••`i../,..A.v.te 0.3L-1 vp.:••,..6m.,.., ,r, , .,:rv,. , 4.,, ,.. r, 114 r 0 .f • I I t; 123 :k '...' 'i„:;,‘,„,,•At'.:•,:,,-.4.**,:.„ ,‘• ___'•••.___.' •‘.......N, r• - 4g, ,,,,,,,:.,,..• ,'- • • ' r , • : ........ii,/•• %In , .1;..t...,, r.s. tag' ":41",""i^...',""A-,•• ,, ""IL , .- ,41,X.4- _ • '• ^k•,,I . , 7F:...,..`r,. -t 4.44. '.r. ...1.- 0 :"' • ' .. 4. ...! '.7 • 0 ' 1....,.• • ..4. '.' • 0 ',.. 4, r 91:,I1N-N'''' iihf ' 7,0,";*414cei ' • - . ll;%.,, 11. v. -*:-,,,,-,*: . -• ' 1100,41.4----,t '%.'•', ''' -''.-• 7', •,,,•v••• " ..,..•••<- ---:,464,41c..‘,:.-".:.,,,,„ ri; .i.• 'No - •-••',' , , i •,•. II- .,_, ••••‘• II • ,,.,„,,„ Nlik___________A. - ,.!_k ..1 -,--_- Avi •; ,41Orlie" •Irrty 1 1 - f a. II .4..4,,, Ili; 4_ • .,,,:•,... . : .• -1 ltpr:iI'4i.l.:S.'., .f'41',1'`.:C. ' .1,•!,' ' . ,. ,. .t,-,,:" 1 b,O WI El ' i ' . ' 9-. - l'..'" ' Ite.‘.41...,121'... Nr•li ,..c.,it„ / 11S11 Z • - .- 4- 4- IP --c, . ,,,, ..... .0.•• ,_ 1 - ,. P,• • •..:•"'", : _T-tir,lip,4i z \. '• ', ! 1 ,,,q--!Itii•( ':' ! ' .... "„\ ' c• \ .;.- 4,11----:** ," - --- ,:', ,v-.."'11;4:2!..c "k. •••';'.-,z;..,„,,ft 1 ;.,, . ti, .t _.:_____J \ i. ' ,P.' ,. . ( .."1 -."-'6.da;::.;.: •'' -,' x,`1., , 4.%• • ' '-. 1 e ,,,,Fiti . .. . ., a,,-,11,./, • if-1N ' '1-\'‘ z li ., .1 • ,,.,,,,:i„,:i. ;. •L.‘k• a --------- -••••s, %et•?..•.07•..ita N. . -0.--•••• ,- I ...:, ljtff-, \ • -- - I \ _111.t. \i.."...,iiii ;;;;',„„..,;;;;,10‘.., _ -..„:.• ,i:',_,I'' , , ......1.,.......;,........L.,.......F.------ A•• ..h.,:•••••••••k•aa.,._ ---•'••••-•0 s•`-',.....11L 3/40 tr- ----- -i-, • lig ..._,...!...,.., . _or . _ _ ._,...0., Bw:__,,_,.. _ •--- 5' ,y,,\ 7-110:,---,-11,.,,. ,,,,,'•.,. ...Th.lintillasjoaawill.eMlbrAW ei„111/"1:-.77-.7......",.... 1,./ • .;iv- ._ ...--lLi .- . • ----- -ILliiiitiarillbari.,,,-,- • -,,,---/ Eil•-• — .47.-7--,,,„ ' AA. =.• -1:-_,=-1.-.--__.",- .••Jr X../. 4,- ..,..t2i i , joifter-,-, <-•:. '-' ', _ Alipl 7' 4,,, . .6. • :- - ' ',- .. i P. -N - GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS--Continued Woodland Described Capability unit group on l Mapping unit page Symbol Page Symbol 26 IIIw-1 75 3w1 Re Renton silt loam 27 111w-i1 75 3w1 Rh Riveiw ash 27 IIwVIIIw 74 201 Sa Salal silt loam 75 3w1 Sh Sammamish silt loam 27 IIw-27 IIw-2 75 3w1 Sk Seattle muck 29 IIw-3 75 --- Sm Shalcar muck 29 IIw-1 75 Sn Si silt loam 29 IIw-2 75 201 3w2 So Snohomish silt loam 31 IIw-2 75 3w2 Sr Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant 31 IIw-1 74 3ww1 2 eu uwin silt loam --� IIw-3 75 ___ Tukwila muck 3 Ur Urban land 33 IIw-2 75 3w2 11 Wo Woodinville silt loam 1/ • The composition of these units is more variable than that of the others in the Area, but it has been controlled well enough to interpret for the expected use of the soils. GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS For a full description of a mapping unit, read both the description of the mapping unit and that of the soil series to whirl the mapping unit belongs. See table 6, page 70, for descriptions of woodland groups. Other nformation is given in tables as follows: Acreage and extent, table 1, page 9. Town and country planning, table 4, page 57. Engineering uses of the soils, tables 2 and 3, Recreational uses, table 5, page 64. pages 36 through 55. Estimated yields, table 7, page 79. Woodland Described Capability unit group Map on symbol Mapping unit page Symbol Page Symbol AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 10 IVe-2 76 3d2 AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 8 IVe-2 76 3d1 AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 10 VIe-2 78 3d1 AkF Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep 10 VIIe-1 78 2d1 AmB Arents, Aiderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes 1/ 10 IVe-2 76 3d2 AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes 1/ -- 10 IVe-2 76 3d2 An Arents, Everett material 1/ 11 IVs-1 77 3f3 BeC Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 11 IVe-2 76 3d2 BeD Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 12 VIe-2 78 3d1 BeF Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 12 VIIe-1 78 3d1 Bh Bellingham silt loam 12 IIIw-2 76 3w2 Br Briscot silt loam 13 IIw-2 75 3w1 Bu Buckley silt loam 13 IIIw-2 76 4w1 Cb Coastal teaches 14 VIIIw-1 78 --- Ea E.arlmont silt loam 14 IIw-2 75 3w2 Ed Edgewick fine sandy loam 15 IIIw-1 75 2o1 EvB Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 15 IVs-1 77 3f3 EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 16 VIs-1 78 3f3 EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 16 VIe-1 77 3f2 BvC Everett-klderwood gravelly sandy loans, 6 to 15 percent slopes 16 VIs-1 78 3f3 T^4 Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes 17 IVs-2 77 4s3 Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes 16 IVs-2 77 4s3 ) Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes 17 VIe-1 76 4s2 KpB Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 17 IIIe-1 75 2d2 KpC Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 18 IVe-1 76 Zd2 KpD Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 18 VIe-2 78 2d1 KsC Klaus gravelly loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes 18 VIs-1 78 3f1 Ma Mixed a:luvial land 18 VIw-2 78 201 NeC Neilton very gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 15 percent slopes 19 VIs-1 78 3f3 Ng Newberg silt loam 19 IIw-1 74 201 Nk Nooksacl silt loam 20 Ilw-1 74 201 No Norma s mdy loam 20 IIIw-3 76 3w2 Or Orcas prat 21 VIIIw-1 78 --- Os Oridia :ilt loam 21 IIw-2 75 3w1 OvC Ovall gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 22 IVe-2 76 3d1 OvD Ovall gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23 Vie-2 78 3d1 OvF Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 23 VIIe-1 78 3d1 Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand 23 VIw-1 78 2s1 Pk Pilchuck fine sandy loam 23 IVw-1 76 2s1 Pu Puget silty clay loam 24 IIIw-2 76 3w2 Py Puyallup fine sandy loam 24 IIw-1 74 201 RaC Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 25 IVe-3 77 4s1 RaD Ragnar fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 26 VIe-2 78 4s1 RdC Ragnar. Indianola association, sloping: 1/ 26 -- --- Ragnar soil -- IVe-3 77 4s1 Indianola soil -- IVs-2 77 4s3 RdE Ragnar Indianola association, moderately steep: 1/ 26 -- --- Ragnar soil -- VIe-2 78 4s1 Indianola soil -- VIe-1 77 4s2 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1972 0-468-266