Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR_Cyprus Lane Plat_Arborist Report_210621_v1 Greenforest Incorporated C o n s u l t i n g A r b o r i s t greenforestinc@mindspring.com Tel. 206-723-0656 TO: Robert P. Wenzl Tuscany construction, LLC PO Box 2170 Renton WA 98059 REFERENCE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 1123059021 1123059031 1123059023 DATE ISSUED: June 21, 2021 PREPARED BY: Favero Greenforest, ISA Certified Arborist # PN -0143A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #379 You contacted me and contracted my services as a consulting arborist. I met you on site 10/20/2020, and again 3/23/2021. My assignment is to inspect trees at the above referenced site. The purpose of this report is to establish the condition of the significant trees to satisfy City of Renton permit submittal requirements. You provided me a topographic survey prepared by Core Design, Inc., showing the locations of the existing site features and the regulated trees. SUMMARY The following table summarizes the tree quantities and categories inventoried in this report. Significant, Landmark and Dangerous categories are defined by municipal code. Attributes and tree condition ratings are provided in attachment 3. Significant Trees on Site 286 Landmark Trees on Site 18 Dangerous Trees on Site 25 Total Regulated Trees 329 Total Retained Trees 60 Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist LIMITATIONS AND USE OF THIS REPORT This tree report establishes, via the most practical means available, the existing conditions of the trees on the subject property. Ratings for health and structure, as well as any recommendations are valid only through the development and construction process. This report is based solely on what is readily visible and observable, without any invasive means. There are several conditions that can affect a tree’s condition that may be pre-existing and unable to be ascertained with a visual-only analysis. No attempt was made to determine the presence of hidden or concealed conditions which may contribute to the risk or failure potential of trees on the site. These conditions include root and stem (trunk) rot, internal cracks, structural defects or construction damage to roots, which may be hidden beneath the soil. Additionally, construction and post-construction circumstances can cause a relatively rapid deterioration of a tree’s condition. IDENTIFICATION SCHEME Each tree was marked with a 1” x 3.5” aluminum tag indicating tree number as listed on the attached inventory, and as shown on the attached exhibit. SPECIES AND SIZE OF EACH TREE I measured the trunk diameter (54” from grade) of each tree, and identified each tree by common name. TREE INSPECTION METHOD – TREE HEALTH, CONDITION AND VIABILITY I visually inspected each tree from the ground. I performed a Level 1 risk assessment.1 This is the standard assessment for populations of trees near specified targets, conducted in order to identify obvious defects or specified conditions such as a pre-development inventory. This is a limited visual assessment focuses on identifying trees with imminent and/or probable likelihood of failure, and/or other visible conditions that will affect tree retention. I recorded tree species and size (DBH). I estimated the average dripline of each tree. I rated the condition of each tree, both health and structure. A tree’s structure is distinct from its health. This inspection identifies what is visible with both. High-risk trees can appear healthy in that they can have a dense, green canopy. This may occur when there is sufficient sapwood or adventitious roots present to maintain tree health, but inadequate strength for structural support. 1 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 9: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Management – Standard Practices, Tree Risk Assessment. 2011. ISA. Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 3 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Conversely, trees in poor health may or may not be structurally stable. For example, tree decline due to root disease is likely to cause the tree to be structurally unstable, while decline due to drought or insect attack may not. One way that tree health and structure are linked is that healthy trees are more capable of compensating for structural defects. A healthy tree can develop adaptive growth that adds strength to parts weakened by decay, cracks, and wounds. This report identifies unhealthy trees based on existing health conditions and tree structure, and specifies which trees are most suitable for preservation.2 No invasive procedures were performed on any trees. The results of this inspection are based on what was visible at the time of the inspection. The attached inventory summarizes my inspection results and provides the following information for each tree: ROW/Alley indicates trees to be removed because of location within a right-of-way or an alley. Removed Tree indicates trees proposed for removal for improved improvements. Remove Unhealthy indicates trees proposed for removal because of poor condition. Retained Tree indicates trees proposed to be retained. Tree number as shown on tag in the field, and on attached exhibit. Tree Category as defined by municipal code. (TREE: A woody perennial usually having one dominant trunk, or, for certain species, a multi-stemmed trunk system, with a potential minimum height of ten feet (10') at maturity. Any trees listed on the Complete King County Weed List shall not qualify as a tree.) Dangerous: Any tree that has been certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist. Landmark: A tree with a caliper of thirty inches (30") or greater. (Average multiple stems and report single integer) Significant: A tree with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8"). Trees qualified as dangerous shall not be considered significant. Trees planted within the most recent ten (10) years shall qualify as significant trees, regardless of the actual caliper. 2 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 5: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Maintenance – Standard Practices, Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA. Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 4 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist DBH stem diameter in inches measured 4.5 feet from the ground. Tree Species common name. Dripline average branch extension from the trunk as radius in feet. Health and Structure ratings ‘1’ indicates good to excellent condition; no visible health- related problems or structural defects, ‘2’ indicates fair condition; minor visible problems or defects that may require attention if the tree is retained, and ‘3’ indicates poor condition; significant visible problems or defects and tree removal is recommended. Comments on Condition obvious structural defects or diseases visible at time of inspection, which includes: Asymmetric canopy– the tree has an asymmetric canopy from space and light competition from adjacent trees. Branch dieback - Mature branches in canopy are dying/dead. Canker - Disease cankers are established on trunk/branches. CBT – cherry bark tortrix insect infestation. Chlorosis – Yellowing or off-color foliage. Crack – separation of wood fibers and predisposed to failure. Deadwood – Large and/or multiple dead branches throughout canopy. Decay – process of wood degradation by microorganisms resulting in weak and defective structure. Diseased – foliage and trunk/stems are diseased. Dogleg in trunk – trunk with a bow or defective bend (90°) in trunk often half way of further up the trunk. Double leader – the tree has multiple stem attachments, which may require maintenance or monitoring over time. Brown rot fungus - Foliage is diseased with manageable fungus. Kretzschmaria fungus – fungal infection with interior of tree decayed. Included bark - Bark inclusion at attachment of multiple leaders and is preventing a wood-to-wood attachment Ivy - Dense ivy prevents a thorough inspection, and other defects may be present. LCR – Live crown ratio: the ratio of crown length to total tree height. Stand-alone trees with a LCR of 30 and lower are at increased risk of failure. Lean – Angle of the trunk from vertical. Multiple leaders - the tree has multiple stem attachments, which may lead to tree failure and require maintenance or monitoring over time. Poor structure – tree’s structure is deformed and defective/unsightly Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 5 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Previous failure – Tree trunk previously broken and defective. Slender – tree lacks adequate trunk taper to stand lone. Thinning Canopy – low foliage density may indicate stress, or early infection/declining health. Stump sprout- Tree previously cut at grade with multiple stems and potentially weak attachments. Suppressed – tree crowded by larger adjacent trees, with defective structure and/or low vigor. Retain tree only as a grove tree, not stand-alone. Sweep – tree leans away from adjacent trees. Characterized by a leaning lower trunk and a top that is more upright. Taper - change in diameter over the length of trunks, branches and roots. Topped – the tree is previously topped and has poor structure and/or stem decay. Tree leans – Trunk has significant lean from vertical. Trunk decay - Wood decay is visible in the trunk. Twist in trunk – trunk fibers are twisted and subject to cracking in high winds. Wound/decay base of trunk - Open wound with visible decay in trunk. Tree Type indicates if tree is deciduous (D), evergreen (E), coniferous (C) or broadleaf (B). Limits of Disturbance Limits of Disturbance (LOD) are calculated for all the retained significant trees (and for trees on adjoining parcels with overhanging driplines). They are listed below as radii in feet from the trunk for the side of the tree to be impacted by construction. They are determined using rootplate3 and trunk diameter,4,5,6 and ISA Best Management Practices.7 These are the minimum distances from the trees for any soil disturbance, only for a single side of the tree as a linear cut past the trunk, and assume larger protection area on the other three sides of the tree. These LOD are malleable and may be adjusted during the design and construction process. This means that they may be increased from what is reported here. 3 Coder, Kim D. 2005. Tree Biomechanics Series. University of Georgia School of Forest Resources. 4 Smiley, E. Thomas, Ph. D. Assessing the Failure Potential of Tree Roots, Shade Tree Technical Report. Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. 5 Fite, Kelby and E. Thomas Smiley. 2009. Managing Trees During construction; Part Two. Arborist News. ISA. 6 Andrew R. Benson, Andrew Koeser, Justin Morgenroth. Responses Of Mature Roadside Trees To Root Severance Treatments. 2019. Journal of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 7 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Series, Part 5: Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA. Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 6 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist SUBJECT TREES The vast majority of trees are native species growing in a natural and/or partially landscaped area. These trees have received minimal to no care or maintenance, and most have structures and/or forms typical of open grown trees. The east boundary of one parcel is lined with non-native Leyland cypress growing as a hedge, and these trees comprise the majority of the ornamental species on the project site. Trees standing in groups, or with structural conditions that impact stability (slenderness, asymmetric canopies, multiple leaders) should only be retained in their current group configurations, and not as stand-alone trees or exposed as edge trees with clearing of trees currently providing wind protection and buffer. Trees categorized as ‘dangerous’ are unhealthy and/or structural defective. Visible problems include trunk decay, slender trunks (poor taper), dead and declining canopies, shoot death/decline, previous failure, suppressed form, deadwood, or the presence of Ganoderma or Kretzschmaria fungal fruiting bodies. TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS 4.4.130 §H.9. Protection Measures During Construction: Protection measures in this subsection shall apply for all trees that are to be retained. All of the following tree protection measures shall apply: a. Construction Storage Prohibited: The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. b. Fenced Protection Area Required: Prior to development activities, the applicant shall erect and maintain six-foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees or at a distance surrounding the tree equal to one and one-quarter feet (1.25') for every one inch (1") of trunk caliper, whichever is greater, or along the perimeter of a tree protection tract. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, “NO TRESPASSING – Protected Trees,” or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. c. Protection from Grade Changes: If the grade level adjoining to a tree to be retained is to be raised, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be equal to the tree’s drip line. d. Impervious Surfaces Prohibited within the Drip Line: The applicant may not install Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 7 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist impervious surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. e. Restrictions on Grading within the Drip Lines of Retained Trees: The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be lowered within the greater of the following areas: (i) the area defined by the drip line of the tree, or (ii) an area around the tree equal to one and one-half feet (1-1/2') in diameter for each one inch (1") of tree caliper. A larger tree protection zone based on tree size, species, soil, or other conditions may be required. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) f. Mulch Layer Required: All areas within the required fencing shall be covered completely and evenly with a minimum of three inches (3") of bark mulch prior to installation of the protective fencing. Exceptions may be approved if the mulch will adversely affect protected ground cover plants. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) g. Monitoring Required during Construction: The applicant shall retain a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect to ensure trees are protected from development activities and/or to prune branches and roots, fertilize, and water as appropriate for any trees and ground cover that are to be retained. h. Alternative Protection: Alternative safeguards may be used if determined to provide equal or greater tree protection. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) Attachments: 1. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 2. Certification of Performance 3. Significant Tree Inventory 4. Tree Retention Worksheet 5. Tree Retention Plan (2 sheets) Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 8 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Attachment No. 1 - Assumptions & Limiting Conditions 1. A field examination of the site was made 10/20/2020, and again 3/23/2021. My observations and conclusions are as of that date. 2. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant/arborist can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 3. I am not a qualified land surveyor. Reasonable care was used to match the trees indicated on the sheets with those growing in the field. 4. Construction activities can significantly affect the condition of retained trees. All retained trees should be inspected after construction is completed, and then inspected regularly as part of routine maintenance. 5. Unless stated other wise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those trees that were examined and reflects the condition of those trees at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of the subject trees without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied that problems or deficiencies of the subject tree may not arise in the future. 6. All trees possess the risk of failure. Trees can fail at any time, with or without obvious defects, and with or without applied stress. A complete evaluation of the potential for this (a) tree to fail requires excavation and examination of the base of the subject tree. Permission of the current property owner must be obtained before this work can be undertaken and the hazard evaluation completed. 7. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made. Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 9 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Attachment No. 2 - Certification of Performance I, Favero Greenforest, certify that: • I have personally inspected the trees and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinion, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis, opinion, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client of any other party nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), and the ISA PNW Chapter, I am an ISA Certified Arborist (#PN-0143A) and am Tree Risk Assessment Qualified, and am a Registered Consulting Arborist® (#379) with American Society of Consulting Arborists. I have worked as an independent consulting arborist since 1989. Signed: GREENFOREST, Inc. By Favero Greenforest, M. S. Date: June 21, 2021 Favero Greenforest Digitally signed by Favero Greenforest DN: cn=Favero Greenforest, o, ou, email=greenforestinc@mindspring.com, c=US Date: 2021.06.21 16:51:39 -07'00' Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 10 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Dripline radius from center of tree Condition ratings ‘1’ good to excellent, ‘2’ fair, ‘3’ poor LOD as radius in feet from center of tree, see text in report body Type indicates if tree is Deciduous (D), Evergreen (E), broadleaf (B) and coniferous (C) Attachment No. 3 Significant Tree Inventory ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 1 6, 6.5 Laburnum 15 1 2 Multiple leaders 2 6 BD X Sig. 2 7 Bigleaf maple 8 1 2 Slender, sweep in trunk X 2 6 BD X Danger 3 14, 14, 14, 16 Bigleaf maple 15 3 3 Stumpsprout, topped, Kretzschmaria X 15 BD X Sig. 4 23 Western red-cedar 17 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 12 CE X Sig. 5 7 Leyland cypress 6 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 6 6 Bitter cherry 8 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 7 8, 9 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Stumpsprout X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8 27.5 Bigleaf maple 35 1 2 Trunk decay X X 1 14 BD X Sig. 9 8 Western red-cedar 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 10 9 Red alder 18 2 2 Suppressed, slender X X 3 6 BD X Sig. 11 9,9 Pacific dogwood 14 1 2 Double leader X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 12 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 13 11 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Double leader X 2 6 BD X Danger 14 7 Bitter cherry 8 3 3 Diseased, decline, decay X X 6 BD X Sig. 15 9 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 16 7 Bigleaf maple 10 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 17 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 18 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 11 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 19 9 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 20 6 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 21 6 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 22 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 23 7,7 English holly 14 1 2 Double leader X 2 6 BD X Sig. 24 6,8 English holly 14 1 2 Double leader 2 6 BD X Sig. 25 11 Black cottonwood 15 1 1 X X 3 6 BD X Sig. 26 8 Bitter cherry 12 2 2 Decline, diseased X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8132 12 Bitter cherry 16 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8133 17.5 Bigleaf maple 21 1 1 X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8134 8 Bigleaf maple 14 2 2 Asymmetric, seam X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8135 6 Bitter cherry 8 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8136 8.5 Bitter cherry 15 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Danger 8138 15 Western red-cedar 14 3 1 Dead top X 8 CE X Sig. 8139 6 Western red-cedar 8 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8140 6 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8141 8 Western red-cedar 12 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8142 8.5 Bitter cherry 15 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8146 13.5 Leyland cypress 12 1 1 X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8147 8.5 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Seam in trunk X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8148 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Rootplate failure 2 7 CE X Sig. 8149 11 Walnut 12 1 1 2 6 BD X Sig. 8150 9 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8151 14.5 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 7 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 12 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8152 10.5 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8153 13.5 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 7 CE X Sig. 8154 15 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 8 CE X Sig. 8155 13,13 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 10 CE X Sig. 8156 12.5 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8157 11 Leyland cypress 9 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8158 15 White pine 15 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 8 CE X Sig. 8159 22 Douglas-fir 26 1 1 X X 1 11 CE X Sig. 8160 26 Western red-cedar 18 1 1 X X 1 13 CE X Danger 8188 6.5 Arborvitae 3 2 3 Previous trunk failure 6 CE X Sig. 8189 7.5 Arborvitae 3 1 1 2 6 CE X Sig. 8190 7, 7, 8, 7 English holly 11 1 2 Multiple leader 2 6 BE X Sig. 8191 6 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8192 6 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8193 7 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8194 9 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8195 10 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8196 10 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8197 8 Leyland cypress 10 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8199 9.5, 10.5 Japanese maple 18 1 1 2 8 BD X Sig. 8205 7 English laurel 18 1 1 2 6 BE X Sig. 8206 6, 6 English laurel 18 1 2 Double leader, stumpsprout 2 6 BE X Land. 8207 26, 32 Western red-cedar 22 1 2 Double leader X X 1 19 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 13 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8215 8.5 Bitter cherry 17 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8216 7.5 Bitter cherry 15 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8221 26.5 White pine 21 1 2 Double Leader X X 1 13 CE X Land. 8222 32.5 Western red-cedar 19 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 16 CE X Sig. 8238 11 Bitter cherry 20 2 2 Decline, asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8239 27 Western red-cedar 18 1 1 X X 1 14 CE X Sig. 8242 23 Douglas-fir 24 1 1 X X 1 12 CE X Sig. 8244 27 Sweet cherry 24 2 2 Decline, old age, multiple leader X 2 14 BD X Sig. 8249 8.5 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Asymmetric, sweep X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8250 13 Bitter cherry 15 1 1 X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 8251 10 Pacific dogwood 15 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Danger 8252 14, 17, 28, 29 Bigleaf maple 45 2 3 Decline, decay, Kretzschmaria X X 19 BD X Danger 8253 9, 12 Bigleaf maple 20 2 3 Decline, decay, stumpsprout X 8 BD X Sig. 8254 26.5 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Asymmetric, dogleg X X 1 13 BD X Land. 8255 53 Douglas-fir 25 1 2 Dogleg X X 1 20 CE X Sig. 8272 10.4 Apple 11 2 2 Topped, decay 2 6 BD X Sig. 8273 6, 7, 7 Eastern dogwood 12 2 2 Disease, multiple leader 2 8 BD X Sig. 8279 8 Douglas-fir 12 1 2 Asymmetric, double leader X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8282 11.5 Douglas-fir 16 1 1 X X 1 6 CE X Sig. 8283 14 Douglas-fir 16 1 1 X X 1 7 CE X Sig. 8284 11.5 Douglas-fir 16 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 14 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8285 13 Douglas-fir 18 1 1 X X 1 7 CE X Sig. 8286 15 Douglas-fir 18 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 8 CE X Sig. 8289 6.5 Western red-cedar 12 2 1 Suppressed X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8290 10.5 Douglas-fir 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8291 7 Western red-cedar 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8292 11 Douglas-fir 16 1 1 X X 1 6 CE X Sig. 8293 7, 8 Western red-cedar 14 1 2 Double Leader X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8294 8, 9 Western red-cedar 15 1 2 Double Leader X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8295 15 Douglas-fir 16 1 1 X X 1 8 CE X Sig. 8296 7 Western red-cedar 12 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8297 15 Leyland cypress 16 1 1 X 2 8 CE X Danger 8318 21.5 Bigleaf maple 18 2 3 Decline, decay X X 11 BD X Sig. 8319 7 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8320 8 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8321 8 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8322 7 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8323 6 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8326 7 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8327 8, 11 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8328 14 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 7 CE X Sig. 8329 5, 7 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8332 5, 6 Excelsa cedar 11 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8333 10.5 Douglas-fir 16 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8334 16 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 15 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8335 16 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE X Sig. 8340 8,10 Bitter cherry 16 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8341 16 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE X Sig. 8342 6 Douglas-fir 8 2 2 Suppressed, slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8343 10 Douglas-fir 15 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 CE X Danger 8344 17 Bigleaf maple 22 2 3 Decline, trunk decay X X 9 BD X Sig. 8345 21 Bigleaf maple 45 1 1 X X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8347 14 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8348 16 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE X Sig. 8349 15 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE X Sig. 8353 14.5 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8354 14 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8355 10.5 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8356 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8357 19.5 Bigleaf maple 35 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8358 15 Bigleaf maple 35 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 8 BD X Sig. 8359 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8360 10 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8361 20.5 Bigleaf maple 41 1 1 X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8362 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8363 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8366 10 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8367 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8368 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 16 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8371 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8372 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8373 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8374 10 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 8377 15 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 8 CE X Sig. 8378 21.5 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Girdling root X X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8379 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8380 14 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8381 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8382 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8383 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8384 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8385 11 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8389 13 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Sig. 8390 14 Leyland cypress 15 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow X 2 7 CE X Danger 8391 12 Leyland cypress 15 1 3 Asymmetric, hedgerow, trunk girdled X 6 CE X Danger 8392 8 Leyland cypress 15 1 3 Asymmetric, hedgerow, trunk girdled 6 CE X Danger 8393 10 Leyland cypress 15 1 3 Asymmetric, hedgerow, trunk girdled 6 CE X Sig. 8403 6.5 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Stumpsprout X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8404 7 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8405 7, 11 Bitter cherry 16 1 2 Double leader, ivy X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8406 8.5 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Asymmetric, slender X 2 6 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 17 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8407 13.5 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8408 17.5 Bigleaf maple 21 1 2 Rope on trunk, LCR <30% X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8409 8 Bitter cherry 14 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8410 9 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Sweep X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8411 8 Bitter cherry 16 2 2 Decline, asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8412 14 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Dogleg X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8413 12 Bitter cherry 16 2 1 Decline X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8414 8 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Dogleg X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8415 18.5 Western red-cedar 16 1 2 Double leader X X 1 9 CE X Danger 8416 10 Bigleaf maple 6 3 3 Decline, topped X 6 BD X Sig. 8417 15 Bitter cherry 18 1 2 Sweep X X 1 8 BD X Sig. 8418 12.5 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Asymmetric, LCR < 30% X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8419 8 Bitter cherry 10 2 2 Decline, asymmetric, slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8420 11.5 Bitter cherry 16 1 2 Asymmetric, LCR < 30% X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8421 13 Bitter cherry 18 1 1 X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 8422 10.5 Bitter cherry 16 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8423 7.5 Bitter cherry 10 1 2 Slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8424 7 Bitter cherry 10 1 2 Dogleg, slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8425 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender, sweep X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8426 10 Bitter cherry 16 1 2 Sweep X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8427 11 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Dogleg, slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8428 10 Bitter cherry 16 2 2 Top dieback, slender X X 1 6 BD X Danger 8429 26, 28, 24 Bigleaf maple 45 3 3 Decline, decay, X X 19 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 18 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type deadwood, ivy X Sig. 8439 19.2 Arborvitae 9 1 2 Multiple leader, included bark X 2 10 CE X Sig. 8440 9, 13 Arborvitae 7 1 1 2 8 CE X Sig. 8441 7, 15 Arborvitae 7 1 2 Previous trunk failure 2 9 CE X Land. 8442 38 Coast redwood 18 1 1 Trunk failed at 70' X 2 19 CE X Sig. 8444 14, 16 Bigleaf maple 38 1 2 Asymmetric, sweep X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8445 14 Red alder 20 2 2 Dieback, asymmetric X X 3 7 BD X Sig. 8446 8,14, 16, 16 Bigleaf maple 24 1 2 Multiple leaders, included bark X X 1 14 BD X Sig. 8448 20.5 White pine 21 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 10 CE X Sig. 8449 9.5 Western red-cedar 10 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Land. 8450 52 Douglas-fir 40 2 1 Top 40' dead X X 1 20 CE X Land. 8451 35.5 Western red-cedar 13 2 1 Dead top X X 1 18 CE X Sig. 8452 18 Western red-cedar 16 1 1 X X 1 9 CE X Sig. 8453 9.5 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Stumpsprout X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8461 21 Bigleaf maple 24 1 2 Previous top failure, trunk seam X X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8462 18 Walnut 26 1 2 Asymmetric, lean X 2 9 BD X Sig. 8472 17.5 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Dogleg, decay X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8473 17.5 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8474 10.5 Douglas-fir 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8475 17 Bigleaf maple 35 1 1 X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8476 9 Douglas-fir 16 1 2 LCR < 30% X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8477 19 Bigleaf maple 30 1 1 X X 1 10 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 19 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8478 7 Douglas-fir 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8479 20.5 Bigleaf maple 35 1 1 X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8480 19.5 Bigleaf maple 34 1 1 X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8481 10 Western red-cedar 13 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Danger 8482 29 Bigleaf maple 25 3 3 Decline, Ganoderma, stumpsprout X X 15 BD X Sig. 8585 9,17 Sweet cherry 22 2 2 Brown rot fungus, dead twigs 2 10 BD X Sig. 8586 19 Sweet cherry 24 2 2 Brown rot fungus, dead twigs X 2 10 BD X Sig. 8587 (4) 6-8 Japanese maple 18 2 1 Old age X 2 7 BD X Danger 8588 15 Magnolia 24 2 3 Trunk decay X 8 BD X Sig. 8589 6 Douglas-fir 10 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8590 24 Norway spruce 16 1 2 Ivy covering trunk X 2 12 BD X Sig. 8591 19 Scots pine 25 1 2 Ivy covering trunk X 2 10 BD X Sig. 8592 20 Scots pine 16 1 2 Ivy covering trunk X 2 10 BD X Land. 8607 40 Deodar cedar 26 1 2 Multiple leaders X 2 19 BD X Land. 8609 65 Western red-cedar 25 1 2 Multiple leaders X X 1 25 BD X Sig. 8610 13 Norway spruce 15 2 2 Aphid injury, asymmetric X 2 7 BD X Danger 8611 16,16,24 Bigleaf maple 25 3 3 Kretzschmaria fungus infection X X 17 BD X Sig. 8612 27 Walnut 40 1 1 X 2 14 BD X Sig. 8613 15,15 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Double leader X X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8614 9,10 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Double leader X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 8616 10 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 20 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8617 8 Bigleaf maple 10 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8618 9,10 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Double leader X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 8619 6 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8691 15 Bigleaf maple 35 1 1 X X 1 8 BD X Sig. 8692 7 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8693 7 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Land. 8694 42 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Double leader, included bark w response wood X X 1 19 BD X Sig. 8695 8 Bitter cherry 17 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8696 6 Bigleaf maple 8 1 2 Slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8697 11 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Asymmetric, suppressed X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8698 23 Bigleaf maple 24 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 12 BD X Sig. 8699 8 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8700 9 Bigleaf maple 16 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8701 9 Pacific dogwood 12 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8702 24 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Suppressed X X 1 12 BD X Sig. 8703 (4) 22 Bigleaf maple 40 1 2 Multiple leaders X X 1 19 BD X Sig. 8704 15 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 8 BD X Sig. 8705 19 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8706 24,26,26 Bigleaf maple 40 1 2 Multiple leaders X X 1 19 BD X Sig. 8707 8 Red alder 15 1 1 X 3 6 BD X Sig. 8711 10 Bitter cherry 14 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8713 8 Black cottonwood 12 1 1 X X 3 6 BD X Sig. 8714 10 Black cottonwood 16 1 1 X X 3 6 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 21 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Land. 8715 33 Douglas-fir 25 1 1 X X 1 17 BD X Sig. 8716 18 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 9 BD X Land. 8717 46 Bigleaf maple 45 1 1 X X 1 21 BD X Land. 8718 48 Western red-cedar 20 1 1 X X 1 22 BD X Danger 8724 16,26 Bigleaf maple 30 1 3 Trunk decay, deadwood X X 15 BD X Sig. 8725 26 Western red-cedar 18 1 1 X X 1 13 BD X Sig. 8726 14 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8727 25 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Slender X X 1 13 BD X Sig. 8728 24 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X X 1 12 BD X Sig. 8729 14 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Asymmetric, slender X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8730 9 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric, slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8731 11 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8732 9,9 Pacific dogwood 10 1 2 Double leader, slender X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 8733 9,10 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Double leader X 2 7 BD X Danger 8734 9 Bigleaf maple 0 3 3 Dead X 6 BD X Sig. 8735 11 Bigleaf maple 16 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8736 8 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8737 8 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8738 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8739 12 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8741 26 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Sweep in trunk X X 1 13 BD X Sig. 8742 21 Douglas-fir 18 1 2 Slender X X 1 11 BD X Land. 8743 39 Black cottonwood 40 1 2 Trunk wound, decay X X 3 20 BD X Sig. 8744 18 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 9 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 22 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8745 27 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Asymmetric, sweep X X 1 14 BD X Sig. 8746 19 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8747 9 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Suppressed X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8748 18,22 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Double leader, deadwood X 1 15 BD X Sig. 8749 15 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 8 BD X Land. 8750 40 Bigleaf maple 40 1 1 X X 1 19 BD X Sig. 8751 15 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 8 BD X Danger 8752 6 Bigleaf maple 12 3 2 Dieback, slender, suppressed X 6 BD X Sig. 8753 9 Bigleaf maple 18 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Danger 8754 17 Bigleaf maple 12 3 3 Previous failure, asymmetric X X 9 BD X Sig. 8755 10 Bigleaf maple 16 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8756 18,22 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Double leader X 1 15 BD X Sig. 8757 9 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Slender X X 1 6 BD X Danger 8758 6,9 Bigleaf maple 12 3 3 Diseased, decline, decay X 6 BD X Sig. 8759 16 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Seam in trunk, slender, deadwood X X 1 8 BD X Sig. 8760 12 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric, slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8762 13 Western red-cedar 15 1 1 X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8763 25 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X X 1 13 BD X Sig. 8764 13,16 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Trunk wounds, nails in trunk X 2 10 BD X Sig. 8765 8 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8766 7 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric, sweep X 2 6 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 23 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Danger 8767 6,11 Bigleaf maple 14 3 3 Diseased, decline, decay X 7 BD X Sig. 8768 18 Bigleaf maple 18 1 1 X X 1 9 BD X Land. 8770 30 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Deadwood X X 1 15 BD X Sig. 8771 17 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Slender X X 1 9 BD X Sig. 8773 6,20 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Asymmetric X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8775 14 Western red-cedar 12 1 1 X 2 7 BD X Sig. 8776 7 Pacific dogwood 10 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8777 7 Western red-cedar 10 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8778 9 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Sweep in trunk X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8779 9 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8780 10 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Land. 8781 52 Bigleaf maple 40 1 2 Double leader with response wood X X 1 20 BD X Sig. 8782 14,18 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Asymmetric, double leader X 1 11 BD X Sig. 8783 8,8 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Double leader X 2 7 CE X Danger 8784 6 Bigleaf maple 16 1 3 Stumpsprout X 6 CE X Sig. 8785 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Danger 8786 10 Bigleaf maple 18 2 3 Suppressed, deadwood X 6 CE X Sig. 8787 24 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X X 1 12 CE X Sig. 8788 17 Bigleaf maple 20 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 9 BE X Sig. 8789 26 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Deadwood X X 1 13 BE X Sig. 8790 11 Bitter cherry 18 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8791 23 Bigleaf maple 30 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 12 BE Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 24 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 8792 8,13 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 8 BE X Sig. 8793 7 English laurel 10 1 2 Slender 2 6 BD X Sig. 8794 8 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8795 8 Bigleaf maple 14 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8796 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8797 25 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X X 1 13 CE X Sig. 8798 7 Bitter cherry 16 1 1 X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 8799 9 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 8800 26 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X X 1 13 BD X Land. 8801 32 Bigleaf maple 25 1 2 Deadwood X X 1 16 BD X Sig. 8802 7 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Suppressed X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8803 20 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Deadwood X X 1 10 BD X Sig. 8804 7,8 Bigleaf maple 16 1 2 Asymmetric, double leader X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8805 9 Bigleaf maple 12 2 2 Suppressed, deadwood, asymmetric X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8806 9 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Asymmetric X 2 6 CE X Land. 8807 50 Black cottonwood 45 1 1 X X 3 25 BD X Sig. 8808 11 Bigleaf maple 16 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Danger 8819 17 Bigleaf maple 18 3 3 Diseased, decline, decay, deadwood X X 9 BD X Sig. 1 6, 6.5 Laburnum 15 1 2 Multiple leaders 2 6 BD X Sig. 2 7 Bigleaf maple 8 1 2 Slender, sweep in trunk X 2 6 BD X Danger 3 14, 14, 14, 16 Bigleaf maple 15 3 3 Stumpsprout, topped, Kretzschmaria X 15 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 25 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist ROW/Alley Remove for Improvements Remove Unhealthy Retain Tree Category No. DBH Species Dripline (R') Health Structure Comment 60' + Native Retention Priority LOD (R') Tree Type X Sig. 4 23 Western red-cedar 17 1 2 Asymmetric X X 1 12 CE X Sig. 5 7 Leyland cypress 6 1 2 Asymmetric, hedgerow 2 6 CE X Sig. 6 6 Bitter cherry 8 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 7 8, 9 Bigleaf maple 18 1 2 Stumpsprout X 2 6 BD X Sig. 8 27.5 Bigleaf maple 35 1 2 Trunk decay X X 1 14 BD X Sig. 9 8 Western red-cedar 14 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 10 9 Red alder 18 2 2 Suppressed, slender X X 3 6 BD X Sig. 11 9,9 Pacific dogwood 14 1 2 Double leader X X 1 7 BD X Sig. 12 7 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 BD X Sig. 13 11 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Double leader X 2 6 BD X Danger 14 7 Bitter cherry 8 3 3 Diseased, decline, decay X X 6 BD X Sig. 15 9 Bigleaf maple 25 1 1 X 2 6 CE X Sig. 16 7 Bigleaf maple 10 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 17 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 18 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 19 9 Bitter cherry 14 1 2 Slender X X 1 6 BD X Sig. 20 6 Bigleaf maple 14 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 21 6 Bigleaf maple 15 1 2 Slender X 2 6 CE X Sig. 22 6 Bigleaf maple 12 1 1 X 2 6 BD X Sig. 23 7,7 English holly 14 1 2 Double leader X 2 6 BD X Sig. 24 6,8 English holly 14 1 2 Double leader 2 6 BD X Sig. 25 11 Black cottonwood 15 1 1 X X 3 6 BD X Sig. 26 8 Bitter cherry 12 2 2 Decline, diseased X X 1 6 BD Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 26 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 26 of 28 Attachment No. 4 Tree Retention Worksheet Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 27 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 27 of 28 Attachment No. 5 Tree Retention Plan (1 of 2) Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 28 of 28 Greenforest Registered Consulting Arborist Robert P. Wenzl, Tuscany construction, LLC RE: Cyprus Lane Arborist Report June 21, 2021 Page 28 of 28 Attachment No. 5 Tree Retention Plan (2 of 2) 329 25 60 9 0 94 235 71 60 11 132 2 66 LOT LOT SIZE (S.F.) MIN. SIGNIF- ICANT TREES REQUIRED NEW TREES (@ 2” CALIPER) RETAINED TREES COMPLIANT 1 10,866 4 5 2 YES 2 9,612 4 0 9 YES 3 9,611 4 0 9 YES 4 9,611 4 1 9 YES 5 10,427 4 6 0 YES 6 12,524 5 6 7 YES 7 9,071 4 3 1 YES 8 9,650 4 5 2 YES 9 9,324 4 4 0 YES 10 9,556 4 5 0 YES 11 9,265 4 4 0 YES 12 9,201 4 4 0 YES 13 12,486 5 6 3 YES 14 9,614 4 0 5 YES 15 9,614 4 0 6 YES 591013R1112151617182019212223242526Q762187918411129131415TRACT A428ROW10TRACT B63ALLEY (PUBLIC)751TRACT CLANDMARK TREES TO REMAINLANDMARK TREES TO REMOVESIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMAINSIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMOVER.O.W. TREES TO REMOVEOFF-SITE TREES6/17/2021 5:55 AMJ:\2020\20134\LANDSCAPE\PRELIMINARY\SHEETS\20134 P10-11.DWG CYPRUS LANE PRELIMINARY PLAT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDSPR21-XXXXXXC21-XXXXXXDESIGN12100 NE 195th St, Suite 300 Bothell, Washington 98011 425.885.7877CIVIL ENGINEERINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREPLANNINGSURVEYINGPROJECT NO. 20134LUA-21-XXXXXX ORCAS PL NE PER RMC, (4-4-130, H, 1. A. I)TREE RETENTION CALCULATIONSGROSS SITE AREA:110,027 SQ. FT.NET DEVELOPABLE SITE AREA:87,618 SQ. FT.(EXCLUDING TREES IN ROW, STREETS & DRIVEWAYS)TOTAL VIABLE TREES IN DEVELOPABLE AREA*:235 TREESTOTAL REQUIRED TREE RETENTION IN DEVELOPABLE AREA**: 71 TREES (244 TREES X 30%)PROVIDED SIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMAIN IN DEVELOPABLE AREA***:60 TREESTOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED**: 66 TREES (@ 2" CALIPER)NOTE:* SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR MORE DETAILS** SEE TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET FOR TREE RETENTION AND REPLACEMENT CALCULATION*** SEE SHEET L11 FOR DETAILS ON TREES TO REMOVENE 4TH PLACENILE AVE NE TREE DENSITY CALCULATIONS* SEE SHEET PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET P14 FOR REPLACEMENT TREE SPECIESTREE RETENTION NOTES1. FOR MORE DETAILS ON INDIVIDUAL TREES, SEE ARBORIST REPORT PREPARED BY FAVERO GREENFOREST.2. UNHEALTHY AND DESEASED TREES ARE EXCLUDED.3. SEE LANDSCAPE SHEETS FOR DETAILS ON REPLACEMENT TREES.LEGENDPROPERTY LINE (TYP.)CLEARING LIMIT (TYP.);SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE DETAILSOFF-SITE TREE (TYP.);NO ACTIONS PROPOSED,SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLYR.O.W. (TYP.)EXISTING TREE WITHIN ALLEY, TO REMOVE (TYP.)EXISTING LANDMARK TREE TO REMOVE (TYP.)EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO REMOVE (TYP.)EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO REMAIN (TYP.)EXISTING LANDMARK TREE TO RETAIN (TYP.)EXISTING TREE WITHIN R.O.W., TO REMOVE (TYP.)BUILDINGSETBACK(TYP.)TREE RETENTION PLANSCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 6/17/2021 5:55 AMJ:\2020\20134\LANDSCAPE\PRELIMINARY\SHEETS\20134 P10-11.DWG CYPRUS LANE PRELIMINARY PLAT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDSPR21-XXXXXXC21-XXXXXXDESIGN12100 NE 195th St, Suite 300 Bothell, Washington 98011 425.885.7877CIVIL ENGINEERINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREPLANNINGSURVEYINGPROJECT NO. 20134LUA-21-XXXXXX TREE TABLETREES TO RETAIN (60)TREES TO REMOVE WITH R.O.W. AND ALLEY, FOR R.O.W. DEVELOPMENT AND DRIVEWAYS (69)TREES TO REMOVE WITHIN DEVELOPABLE AREA, FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT (175)TREE RETENTION NOTES1. DANGEROUS TREES, OFF-SITE TREES, AND INSIGNIFICANT TREESARE EXCLUDED FROM TREE RETENTION AND REPLACEMENTCONSIDERATION. THEY ARE THEREFORE, NOT SHOWN IN TREETABLE HEREON. FOR DETAILS, PLEASE SEE ARBORIST REPORT BYFAVERO GREENFOREST.