Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA99-069 NW 1/4, SEC•. 14, TWP. 23 N. RGEE 5 E., W.M. '1, ,---- ° nAwc/ �% �ip� F � t�I I —r Y i i, tell =d• 1 -/ y- /, - -�__ I f'I 'I r-' 1 I ��. .V r',� `.l __...,__I, 's I 1 •q i 9 ill `'' et -� i.. r' I ,/ T,. b I I 1 _._l.I Ii / *�r' IL�C p Lit I:i M• �'1 r .1 "_nc__J �-__-_.I I „ sy pf.u,r ,. l my I L_--I '' ' Ir i a - ,I ',j r 1 ys r. I IyOH V. I I / e. l ` I I • I 'sod V. 1 Y ' f r�raw•a( I I 41 I Y L___J L___J L___J < / '� �\% 1 y ++ I LY [y�� Y•rO l J {'�TR/CTE __. .. /' 1 I � -r� F I ‘.14„,' II ruV I o_ r _ - ' 1 alwlr I u� �, n I I II' N r _./ \ 4 I 1't I r j I TR. / I I r' \rr. L_1.ra�� I I i:''.'��- / ' ,, yc\ J Ili „i t r---1i 2: 1 1^ i o '� \ I I I y - ,"---,</ ` I I � i/ IJ \\ •w,r. \ I 11 'I iwa r. I 1 -d ` ` \\ I -.., `, `•� C ry.r. ' ice„, 9 '�. / I,C `�`� i ;� . `fir . /'i/ , _ .ram ,,\ f r i ! /a /� • < I l' x.nxa can ' �d ^\�\ `.�' \<\i �� • / / /'/ I• k ,'s./''y/•� b\' / `\` /I \�\ ., 4 , : T) 1T II I SI//' I C Yi; -.< < y /, \V� \ '/ 3,, _ $ A �L--�" a / o --r _ O J a` 4 (•I i ----it '; —._ __/ t / l\ \ t_ I jj `�r 1. ,,,___/ 'sake/.r r./ �, �.4.4 `,v %or 1 ,_ g : �illi I INN / kiln. �r 'y' _ ♦ r'/ �- fZ ,i1y '`„ I �� / j: i rti / Cab ae/ • •..r 5 .<' �,.. - "\ Ay ♦\.. !q I ( ` r---1 ---- ---- - .e rm no �•.•�..• / N b '{�.<\ `.,r«r ,:�% ;n,\\ `� r., rt I I I \ 1 -1 -.- Q i'.�. I <I .\ \\•Asr ` C \g\ r,. .I ETy 1 m rc� I P r ♦� JO1,n^" • t' WETLAND Al .,)"\\. i / \ \\ » \ ) \ --J L____J Lwp-J _"� I ��.:J i Qkh (uw I �_ _ h r; is U__ 1 r___i i __, r -b 4 \rolr..; . . ^\ � . /// II I I I I 1 9 b I I I { / '2 I l I' yII I S. If SyI"'I 1cb 6 I w I _ •rI Irl I. I r L I•i V' , s V' , \ W I 411 I 1 1 i t ' --� rr-� r % Ito % i \ Vi lei' Y. [1,11 '/ Ivy I I I I ,I I I I_ _I L_ - -_� 4 V_J 1 _.�_- '.:1\�i,;i'�\' `.\ I 1 n1•r. I 4....). 41.1.).l' N b ly Y T ▪ -'�'--, � ,�-1 L. TR•CTH < SS e I t� L I V/ how r.I I.w r.I .m I goo rl= y I .1 T I 1 IsvlMOM rsolAsolvoirlOs \\r1r , \ \ --�L---J' L w- L; _� ---J L __ — • - __ 1 L I V \,i' ya' I y^ -.WETLAND TQ�.. FILLED - if _ _r _ /+,. F ,I`�-! 4 •MV// 1 1 I dI I I - I I l r\--.i F--- r-- r___1 r_- i:�^L_ ___ l' 4 : , �� ITS r - $ + _ \,\ - / }u. 14 x(.,:d y y I I I I ~ - I I -.I I A L ' r I J u I 8 c�' /. I I 19 1 # c L___11 -rJ m DowIA I, $1•oro A• I.y I µ " 1 1 Z a • g tt- _L L •'11___J 1 Jwa r. Ib1,r w1 I AI m.vc�n«.. _.- -p. ,. - _r_ _ _-__ -__ Lwwm r. • __J ...I" m.Lj y.w r i �_0 0 0 V it N OW .,..o.no 1p w n .. eo _ I SHEET OF SCALE: `1 a 4 so' Q,,u '° p �+ ,d' t 4 .iTe<ME� bay - -� 4 o ER �TMA �• _______________ _..... ....._.1.1..: ...:p___ __•1%,...____ __,_ ).,- . 7 $ r--------r w•ih 0 1 .h • 0 +y 1 Ir„ir f,,... ......, ..., .,...„ .... .... , . ' ''..' ,,,..1.. .... E4 . , ,, t i. ..... ..., ... . ...,.....$ ,.,, ....4 ..„ , h h .0 e I . i•., u! ::, 3 a. gZ N Q7Pe7 YE ym ' '• • ' '''''-----. .'N-----v--'.--Z------tCjililhilliir--- \ 4. •r\-.-..... % '.4 , • mqtc mCI A 4 .'+w 4 D 'h h he Im ).. 4 1,, ..., . a II Nm m• l.0 AAA .t... •••• . , ** /r/ tv • • .., • h y I• u h -• . <1.... a). **. ...4 9.37----'---. , I A. - ...C../ - ):_ ,.. %-.- .._,,... .. •• .... • ..4 .6.• .8_)y\?._.y. • 0.\ tea kr • a • ''• tit \ • N' ;S..---'< . z9 •• •••.... .4,,k. \ s .1C(' .• . . •s *. • ••••• • • •—_—.11:1...... ('1 t . d ,. •,. ...„.„ • I . , ,,,, ct- , , • 90 ....... .. • . . . h'a s y [NLq IIbMaY [,C41LbR/N N96 "L� .1 1 [788E78bv• N • qn 313I2•a7[l asa9 v a,DATE YAY,1DDD '.,,,.»,... .,..vo.} REM9 s 1 [FAME N m TOPOGRAPHY MAP [ ' . a.. b y DESIGNED G�A'MAE4k7P MAPLEWOOODODOS AIGK w9 DRANTI L W �r APPROVED Planning [20J t[BN Ava.NE Sutra 200 ,' A•'•i 49 BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION Plana, na 885-78•,Wa,Nnpron 3F. 1 h0.•�4 '� OPJE.[MANAGERRUEGER II2I5-ITONI ING NE,SUN£201 Surveying (425)8812877(425)88J-7983 F. ,C IW n PROJECT MANAGER BELLE ;WASNINGION 98003 _...® I ___,. — 1 I1 ArNx-, ---J\� \\I iiiiii ". I Nv. —ram, I !I f 1 .•.;.•::. -....., ... ',,.. t 1 •/ .19 /s . I a 1 • • h ° /xi:NI 8. ` ••a •h •'� 4• y c3 :..... "a '••§ •'; q 4::: [t' I a•'' 4y • eq y • li• I� •S�9 ••'„y'•A .q•�Sq• +.�. � h �::: ::c-'-'11,'• .,,,,,.:\--:::, •.: ` hN II' .' 0.•j$t •`• '•.�.4 y h C ,k • !. %is' 1 . ••., .1. .-...: -;.... . )•• 4,.., I •1 4: % •4 h •, \ 3• m Pil vJ I .4 •h .4 ' .4,.4, �DC�Dp..„\ ' ( rri ti n I .41,yZ ` > •S i if I •••• ..' •••• "......:••••• or‘ %. .,,,,,../-___ .. '•-• / , it ...,, -..„ ... t '''''•a J I• e„,, • •,..4 7.:`:•4 V. „. • \ •••4 . l'.. .•,,, ,1 ''S e ,. •q y h �' pi 1 ' Qh •y I h I 1 y h o h•i \•.y. 4 • • K .. ____ ,, \ '7_____:_x"--- __ II 9..... ...,:a ,..,.. S ••• e /-------N__ ' \) Q •h .q 1. r 4' ts N. j � •, •• • • g •: •• aq µ •h y h � • - • 4 9f •h .4 •q i" 1 -- % -N____,r.: _L.--1 ' .2. • ..41 .•'. to • ..'. .:„...,,ifr, . *VI, •• ..- '%:_e *'. oo _.t. .4: ..„ • i, or-'2- 7 -‘ !a I 1/ / / �s m N, -- la I Or r,NaS-� Q> , xl.•9„b. r''«an N�aanr wm m Aare w:na,rovr DATE MAXJ999 xO. •:xaws CMCa m TOPOGRAPHY MAP I # 'DESIGNED Cl A'R(Lli19 _ _MAPLEWOOD 00101 Fxa 8`. - .!). - 1, DRAWN LRIK 9 �iCoO APPROVED BURNS TEAD CONSTRUCTION E�a;�aa, 'a;,;��';,„;;/ ,:=;0, 3V,.,,..,,�:r` W CAW 1 KR EGER 11215-120R1 A E N.E.5g/IE 201 ',AL Le.2 PROJECT MANAGER 8EJ2EN/E.WASWNOTCW 98005 Svrveying (425)885,8,(425)885 799J Fax I i 1 I - I:'... .'",•'' , •••‘ ________ _1411114"IL GAL _-- -........... • , N 00'18.44•E r / 0-, • ,0 0 ... e . ... ,. .. : • ., .. 10111 0,4 , ..4 • • . •*. ' .7.' .. . (.2) • 0 .... S . .h • , . . C7_---- % -1,11.1111111111Io'.--1 • t- t 14 II ..s.AMl -,-\--V 4• **(-"/,No ....' 7 .--------- § 8 af.t•SIXON , , P I IT ir / — r ' .•:>..•.<."k•.,•.••i AI .... 0 15,91,KM MVO ITY4 LW• '-- III Ai 1.11 D AA NM 5,o,One ux,-0,6, 46ai ,:14. 1.22•E n. - .. "1" • f 0.411.1,016 .it .... ..., ...: r, /a. st \ ... ...4 .., ril ... x 50 •t 50 i # re (ti 1.11 .• o, ...,„ . _--,r • ..., .;n1r01:676 6.. 1 714- I s ' • 1 I ••.,, 1; ! ,I , . . • ,I I ,1 1 I I ,' `............;_____......„.„rrr r •• I I ; . . . , ••• - . ••• • ••••-•••••••••••". '-"• '•; .I, • II . *,,•4 /. ...4 I ! 10 t •. I I .kl.z.... . .... W. • 'Cl . I... 1 I L i _ — — I r ,.... .,1 — __ — _ __ DATE NM.1999 TOPOGRAPHY MAP , i i GO I .. " . , --- DESIGNED Ed KRUEGER 00Mo E A ow I MAPLEWOOD a, -,DR AWN TL.KENDALL 6 i 6 APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION Planning 4205 148th Ave N E Suite 200 V.,...,ata..., 03 A) Cn CRAIG a KRUEGER 11215-120111.41E.N.E.SUE 201 Engineering Surveying (425)Bailee.,Washulgton 96007 •SI.,.. i 885-7877(425)885-7963 Fax : PROJECT MANAGER EIEUEW&WASFAPIGIAV 98005 1 ,. ..;:e.fl'..V illi I 7,,7.. ,I ...15'. 71 il :F.. ---\ ' ..i 1 1 ,:___ _s_____ _ _,.......2,,. ...,2...., ,,.. ., , , .__ - .., 1 .. -Almrs-ifflow-- . - ,--- . 6, , —...... __z--4- L__. _., ---!_7-- - -- ,,.---. .fir 7,"" - ' ..„ , • . , ,,,, '• "' ' ,- - 6 x _ 6 jr. 1,,, _ 4 ,- , / r, _ , . -- - , , 4 .., , _ n . ... . 1 I 4 ,., i — " I in , . ."... ." • , . 1 ..,.... . .., . .4. , .. s • i i • , , . .. . , . l • , ...,. -,2J . •,.... or) 'WI-- ..--...... ,. ------7/ . A* %., .,....\_____ .,..... • AIM —,-,. .,-- " .I I 1- _ , --I-- / -.:-_,-,-„, — — n, / ,..,:.....-,r.. .2„;;-;..,:•;,,-— —I- -,_ (3, ' ..4,.. „n ,Al 3 I . :4:-,';',;;;-, ,-7';,`"' — • .....4 .-•-,,, AO, ....------. 't•P *-1 , -r., ry _ c.) . ? * --- r -- I 4-' ' , •.;,----:-J1 -.• 1 rti ..... . -lama , A ___41 ... • CA'-- .11jr 1 i 11 11 rfll I rAilrflIt* „ -.- ___ 1-fr- if . $ , • 1 1 _....,,,, A . ,, ,,, ; ' • '-': i ..." '''' ski , _ ..11: = ..,./ .• 1 _. __ ) 1,' i ^ * , il 1 _____ .. h61-1 -s-. it _ 0, , ,_ A -1-- t.- - ' ...- , ;MI. f . -6 ) I :,__-_-:I i 0- -.'3:: L. le t • ;II I ....... I ' '-'--' .., 4*- — —- -, ; • ,64 .., ,,,,t,, . .....,e. — ..... „II itir .4 i ,-5----- 4 4.44 '''':* •Ti.v7 L IIIMIE — moh• . -,.. mu 0 ,___ `,1-, ra ilkAp -7\ I Ito irmniadituto__ 1 ' I,ft..4.40 mom trii airmil‘m.--' _,_::::iiiirloOrialitiLii, ', Ali aleimmill mu i I ' ' I 1 •. ! . .,,, ..., ,...-...1.-- . .i .- - -, / L _4%,'Y'i -'' 'IN_tir:.raiii—'12111. 4!er11110--"Wi / , , ;1 (1 DATE ARK 2111 we TREE CUTTING/LAND CLEARING PLAN -, , .114, ;:,,DES I GNED 44 MEM %V MAPLE WOOD ESTATES WOO. DICZEI 4,9, .DRAWN LAW 4 z APPROVED BURNS TEAD CONSTRUCT/ON Planning 1205 111Ith Ave I 1 E Seen 200 al G3 ;,) MAC 1 881UE882 Engineering Seinen,Neshingbn.007 x PROJECT MANAGER ZLEV-1//,'IrS41./T4i'E.S.:00'.5r 2°' Survey'', (125)8854812(125)815-1.53 Fax NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. _ \ -i d - SEE SHEET I OF 3 ,I iry .d' _ - �. use eRim_SCALE: 1" Sb�. � • I \ g UV \ fr-I kk_._ ,\ 1 1 1 ..MI:4 11 — II /I.. /..:��r EPTLA/�E j \ i ` '��! I ��f\' .`' I i / / 1 _/� 1111 I�N . ) � II ,\ \\,,, i: / `, 4, '''. ' 1".'Wk..Neal` 1/ ) - l , , - 7-ail*/ \ , .',3 / .e. ‘ -- / Minsity : / ! , 1 iii iii _--i- 1,1 - _L__--..,-.---:__ -, , . .. ifigtri4i-<, '‘(/ !:/ ---- ",4cialiFilww," 1 , L. , 1,:mt \ .. .., ,2-..4 . ‘4,, "... %•4,-, 4 . 4-.1,., -- -4/. 8141-p i It- ' ` Atirk.4�— ` " .: r -., fi illi PI? /4/ / -"Ilh\ -'‘,. - 4101/ � • j�o e��1 dwewD /.y 4074. L �. \ �i � A r.LE N 1:7?...."-J‘ a . !- / reli. . ,7_ .- ' rr /-7 - -/ ,, , / ) / 7 \.../ • ....„ -- / ) &E. `,_ ii,,--of i Eli '/7—1;‘t, t"1—rigal ti -f w Grp, 19 . -e =.-, i, - •, °." ",ter 0 / - — ,' —° °..- W ‘, ':i fillkili i frib ..."`"...- 1111 ...0iii%.......... ...... .....„*"...„....,.....-77,-.-----..- ? 1 ''1:11.1r MN >-'4:2 •...._7..,..___1114141*,...*TaMimplinTh—r "'''=r;*.nril-*1 ill i VA% 1 /7.0 '''' T,, p Q tj:t ' ,, IOW iiM7 •it ' o aa�• l,' .F fie'. - lit/ ,i� I . �\ " p 4 O V;1 .0 : : I;; � II �_ F Es .0. it'.I MI �. - /� . if , ,, ,_ . ,,_ , ,, :r In , • 'J .#-,---:\ -, , _._.: co _47, . , 1 _ � i i ,. ti. ; •I I tii.,_ , . I 1 S__ ,a r „ 11111,77kWAIME� ;1" O• is ��MEI � i -0 ' '� 1�i �ak�4 WILT ,.. ,/ 7. / 1 , / AM.4,j .,‘. (.10t.y-.0 ,4 ME - III1 I i .1 ""- I 1 : till It , ; 12 . 9 !: 1 / ' , "I'.- --//I i''', 4NL f i in ✓� l Titi �� i1 �I ! o E 0 < 1 ii r 1 _.../� �"�✓_ '•� � 11 t �` ,i�� ;Ilu kY SHEET OF Y1 I� n R4i NEE SWEET 3 OF 3 %•oJiI1� .-,amiiiinimigiiammil.....-,-,.........?=0....0.4.0miirossWolilli NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE SHEET 2CF3 Li;I::,j 3. 1 aitgil - I -- I 1 i_ / / 1.-' ION \....__ t .,...,_ __, r° --..or...- ./ / A it, , ) 't MALT E , __..s- N _...___/. i , ,_4. .4,0 .....--4=,.. ; , , , /- --:4. I t . , /7 ' -- gi ‘, ,:,,,, / 477. ..,„ „: A_.,e ,r , /1 .. . I. .,.. ., ',a, /10.,0 :7 ';-,>-'- 1 �' xTLAND A .r1 Am-AREA I f) 124 -.` ..r / •e :;/ .r\\,`` �rV.o.. d r r,r a�I' 44t \ Ai 1 if4 • ) '4°_, ter! \ _:if -- .4. ,- '...1.: ., ,. /. , / ,‘ \ 4"/ N.-,-L.0-.—._i /.4',. , i .te • .� .A:.J tom '7`- A e o S " - d' /fro•/ �.�`; �� N.'f . '�� e '�� \ ;-,_-)c 1 ./,;0_,,i rf/i ' i t„1 \41/1 4' 0.e • --e- ,9 -C--1,,, -.. k Ili _ _ . '4 X; . - ailk 0-0 0 •�: I---- I / 417 • I I � �. . r v� ' O► OO j.4. . • / - teai. � �� N.-pN ,.,, ,,. „, r Al - ' 41 W n.r . 1,1,11 I ! Or ? , +{ : i d- � „ii, . . ,.., • .4., „4, , ,, ), , .. ,,,,, _.*,.„.....„ . \ '4'4 '''' -, \N..%) *... , •4.• ( r ‘4 % I.•ram .0 Mi4 111-4L41,. .� _ ° a _ --- Jay 4" ''..'.��` l,. f �� r£{i sTi sa'"' .e .Q Ail r dr •� 3 ° i • '... ..' 00 --- --- .m p ��.:_,•�. rem r � r� w r�f' .r o c° °< `f- , SHEET OF SCALE: 1" = 50' '._�- TM in' 3 3 „,94168` V 14 11 .•'.:,..='a ii; ' t Wit .3„.. -:, 1 4"' .,'- --7.. 11111.111 _• ____,,,, ....,;.„_ __ _ ,•,.% c-ifty.rier . --An12,---- ,' ----"--,C===-EgEg! ''-- . 114111npillEPILIWIRMIIIIIMMIIII_ "RINII.WAILIIIIIIII&',.„,..7__.1.iir = . i!_._., _. ... '''''Ifr N 74414.•::,' ' 48" 1 I r____/' r. •• . ..,..,,,,,,: ... Ar A i' . I 11 / .a ,- .•.€ I 4: .• , ... 1• 4 ,. ....., , .... . ,,.. ., . , ...,... .,.. .. • ., * .. I I I 6 I g I ' POI I 0. tit .. .. lli —.* § It -. / ' ft........- 4111 ) ,.__., )001 ' / ..tk .CL. —.. I N 0011irE---,' -., _----- .. ,-------, , / _- ,--t,M --,---- T rn to t Y Ai 5) ----' 'i. _-- - .N00 172.1- P26,23. i 1; -- 't ' 1 .,.._ — , ....„..8 ..., .......______..-------.___,mo•-----T-, ..-.----;-------...------12,---Ar.----- .="7." t\) Ci LI ' • W ti ,}1/ V, e 1 'T 41 4-- . a ra ' , . / .. G) , dimm.w , !Il...1.1.ivoimgaii imairt_ -• imm.,.., / ......ammairjr N.., a ...--,,,,, 1 1 ' 1 rti , .. , , 11 . 4242; , if 1 I ,—)4 ' , j1I ir. i ' s• i ;t- ...,Ityf 7 i — e..1 . 1 4 ---------1 i . ... 1 - - I .1 _ _ 't___.t, _. ,_.., ,T. lid N q0-22•41.1 , 60i2 APO ___1 ' .. •!- ,.,--1''' I 1.. AP A' 14A g ir ±-1-Aisirill ]4 §gii* z 0 211 .. a. I iiii.11!!nn - . .., 5- i-- r §t , ') -- Wi ,„ ii / . 1 .--,),_ , • — L,- -----.. DATE MO Iggg ' PRELIMINARY UTILI111 0/?ADING PLAN PAP?!?! RAID DESIGNED JA.0/504 P.E MAPLE WOOD ESTATES •-i10' .t9 -•DRAWN LA IR ) , . 11 .k R APPROVED — BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCT/ON 014I0 A~GER 11225-WON AA".ME,SWF Xi Pla'ming Surveying 4205 14811)Al!.ME Sult• ,.-'...424,40.$' Sallarso,Washington 28007 ,,,,,,,, (425)8854877(44 1812263 F. PROJECT MANAGER BELLEW&WISIONGION 98005 n 5-9-, I 1 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. 14 . SEE SHEET Y OF 4 � _ I.. 4. 4, /fi\ 14 1I �� co — l' Tl'elHar \II :1O �� S(iAL.E: 1e ss .�'. x3 Illik_.----. . ........______111.,...-ite., iq A '. R '� \\ " dOett aro. 17; -7.71"‘ ;-7---) . It II • WI • sa AVERAGE OFFER OD1H „ .. '.1 1 xx '` 4 � i II �- \\ : /r ;cla IP 11 }I A le \1 \ - — _ g//, Ids ��4 Wilk ii " _ � \ .71�.� / I I I / LLETL/aD E ��•�'1i R►� .-) -' ' ' \ ,, \ • , • L : • , 1 _ i c \ `< D xo\ /, re I' ' 4 \ sx R I Ill I W go 1 I - 4 1 .,_„; IF 1 4 r— ---- .• ' — ------- 00$.11:;"7 44•11 62 i A lit\I ' / , /I mow. 4. ; .,-,„„...7:1/ --,.- ' I ‘AILS'-''' .. ' - / \le\ p,!../'' , 1, 6 p. �4.,k. I! ...41 i '' T„......._ ,,,..°- - 7-1/ 1:. , ill • .. N.'t I ;-iill 5 1 i \ L......,.... or wk.,. _� 11 � \\ SO'A`eR401 aweenw ti _.„....,.... , f 777 .... " / _/ ' -----:----- / /'. ,1 , / 7'/,.,..>/.r.„../.7::";::::7,--j:=1,,,,,../ ....'j)'''' 1 g '• %,,,‘.. liviiitititt,....„._ , 11 7,•e--- ) ,..A,,s .j• 1 • /7 ' : ' .----r- TRACT C I fZ:$ oat zotoo 1 , i , ) i ik, .i.4..L.4-----,-70 4 L i f ��ei�f1Q� w -a " �v +/-- a _ / ,/ k ---- „,,. -6. ,„..._.4.-------Z--..'.,.L-z......,—_-.z,,,,,11-1.-L.,...... . ......... ..„7.,;...r...—...,%," IP...., ,.._________ , ,-- — ,„„ ,,,; 1 t 9 / !� c J I jO U; 1� it .� (4,4_.= ^� I / � / °�� oa 1.. ��3 ,. i.± //� iF �� , Q W Wry I ; s r� i uFr�a p I - =� t .� 'w �J �• �� / MITIGATION, ) Ibil.. , I Z `. _J9i� \ 7- 111/ ! — --' N. ARM I / I i G, i t- I 1 V - / / Ill I l 1101"<:'":v,Inll ----/,, - i , - 03 WI 4„. (r.... li I / /a7�k.1K/ \ I `II` Ui,L,eel, \\\\ / a l 1 _�I y� iu A , a `� 1Kp��E I• 1 I ' / '—�. ` / 1/ ■��C (its/mat A)- / , Ir" zo: / / i dkg• ,- -, i \ 18 6 — i . ' 1 o Y i 11 _ 1n.wD G/ ilN—_---4F.... _ p . Q l , itz 11 , to < . 7eI I I / r.� • � . - r :1; _ SHEET OF SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 "a H,.eEa NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. •1 '=. . L )1 I l i \ " i I .,_ .1.ETLAND 4/ // J 'I ' ..k t I i II '' 1 SEE SHEET 3 C 4 z 9 ii,,,,,,, s' I — II 4 /// I I l / I � Et m!_i'' \I, 1 a..iii. .,2 I r / 4 ' `-iiikt / / ..rt,. . . 17 / / , ,, ..,, Nrit/ . , 7:- f-' ,,g, : _ , , -\, , „ ,,,.. . -7,s ,, ._,,,.. , ,,,,,., , i A, . „iv._ „ 1 .4. , yls(4.ft-7111 / - r----> ' \I \ ,/ - . ,AV,41‘ _ , . op , 1, , 7- --Nmilz- , 1 (#$ i i ik I II 40,11// mob . i : u ::: A ``�' ��\ jTRACT -_-.. / `. `7ti7 if//' � aiB 41:6'. ''''‘'s ,=1,1:4116:4 mil --1 1 I ir a %:___ it:,-z• / ` -z-N- • /- , � i ,/1 ,,, / _ ;'1 e. 1 t A PAW 0% 11. / ' %''' 7=.2. - , I \ k f---t, \ 7: ,„,,,i .......... . , , ,, -1-, , : 1 , - -- , t pa _ \ , , , c., / "\\ N'41\, O / AIS °n`", ' � °'� _ " Q Caf i 21'lc: C 3t)ci)6-`:'..'i 8. IIM: Ilg e / i� �` � I a I� / r !� Itgl o QR rO e IV o ',I q , ' a 41 cc j Q 2 Cl cl) 1 co C6L TRACT N ! j.�11410 / 1 it r YT1l V. - 8 __ ,x 74417*- -- IMI.-.410-00/74-1-'c--..1; r '• NV, — pr- '-z---_,,--1-_-_ 1 I vi 't, 1111INIMIll Bi i W 1 ' i _, ,, ..—_________ > w ¢ f ' rN T m RMc �" � l�. ]" �r• �� I o \ w,,P,0 namosod .-_.,, —' �M� a �'. SHEET OF SCALE: 1 L...CT R VT SWIM '` ..R......,. 1IXIM PDX, ,F p,.�m me mob 4 4 �- O'a��ee EA NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., ROE. 5 E., W.M. k SITE STATISTICS alNEb !CANTPPL I IO!-OOTN AK NE.SUITE TOI _.WASHN•TON WOOD AREADMTR!!D AMAOXMYTELT 51 ACRES (AM d CONTACT. KTRT(MATE EARII460I11C I 6 RMTR G TEAM mN TNRDe PLAN'ER/EN R'EEW VEYOR a� DCOOS .NC I EXfJVATICN ST,000 ODIC TARJ6 COS-WTN AYE-HE,Mlfl!]00 eaaNrR a• O1oz.00 an rA1®6 seocn MELLEVUE NAFN.FiTON »(A )ESS-TET CONTACT:CRAI J.K UEGER JIM A.oL$Er+-E^e I 1 I I <rJ N EC AN VN J. ameRZA0.061-GAN yw t .0...+, q ii �rvJRv—ErnE— — - SCALE: 1" = 2001 �ti-� s a SE SHE: •' • t SRR/CRRK F.SLOPE 1 g. .,a S ��., I _JO.won,/ .IS AT' 6.5' 15• MATCH EtlS'1NG • tF�1�. �� S �� RO� LtaVOFEIE 16 I IN10 OR 151114 g �Y[ �I N)L KWCIE9VL OPABE IP ��/�. NM9►YriW �.A''LtT FJ151NC GROUND ,i El MOMS, AM ®�� MI OLEREA CA AREA TO yPRONOE A SUITABLEBASE 5•fELENTCOVOFTIE SRXMK.Y _ + .AYTi��I� ��,• 4 •, —��,� AND p/TJER 7E ERTCK LURE A6•INICK IN CANON BRCY ELSERNERE)1$ -FwiCe Nil ' ,*� ' S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS y �, i in NO SCALE P t, =Pt, 410,_ __, .14'44fr 1.11iP, -- Mer SMy �� /l rrigI B -11 'I .i 1• 33' 16• 6• 6' IB' J 33' T• hL liia �m BKAC1ENT SEE JRCALPAN T OrtME• rs — a , ♦ , JNS SNE£T N'FRCAL COTS!CUnER _ I ��, ",--39. If. rSEEPµ FARRS Q `LI ay SECROv C-C 3 1l �� 7� S.E. 132ND STREET 'b 2,AA ��0 , '-� �� M 3CKE \ O O Wk `� O® M� 60' RIM I R i!iI1iiIatt co r 148THAVESE.` (S.E. 12STH ST. TO SE. 132ND ST)■ M — — - Y E� No SCALE E°�' • « R� Y 6 y ti — ,,, Mr 53 5 1Q• i 16• 13 I C.. � zo _ z, W � Qa F •REL1r a-mew T LcOTS F O E O < LYWOV[lE 9OEMKA' N!RRCAL CURB J CVTIER SHEET OF SECBNB-B TYPICAL ON-SITE ROAD SECTION 1 4 NO rUP PROJECT'RA!FR 4u. 9 NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. 03 -- • 7 _ Wr co 11lr1� I — \ SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 2- - I r -- - -w...„.,041 c_-- NN . --- _ h —_—_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER/APPLIC,NT °y' ,` " PARCEL.N„ BI1RNDrE.AD COJSTN IQD TM-QO AVE NE.E-SURE 201 Ell: R-� , TIE WEST MALE CP 4. MST HALF 1 THE NORTWEST QUARTER GF SECTION M, BELLEbtE,WANIRGTON SSOO5 I� DELL NSN-ISro \ , tOWNSMIP 13 NORM,RAIY#!EAST,WLLINETTE FEIDDIAN,N KEG FEET CCNT.CT:RCN WCM1ES i'c • �` MN a Wa1MSGTOL EXCEPT THAT PORTtw TEIECF DF THE NORM 50000 IEET LTNG EAST OF THE EAST LtE OF THE WEST 30 4€FEET SAID SUDDINSIOW AND EXCEPT THAT W 4 SEE SHE n� !•- `' PORIIOI TMEIEOR LYING WTMN TIE EAST 22500 FEET CE THE SOUTH KeDDI€ Q PLANNER/ENGINEER/SURVEYOR s 1 ` TNE NORTH%S0 FELT OF SAID SUBDIVISION,AN EXCEPT THAT 2ORTICN T EREOF 2 2 ER5 NC- 8 a , , V I CCNDEnED N KNG COIN eU'EROR wow CAUSE NUMBER 6322S3 FOR MIME-AST ury� LLq NE SUITE]OO �; _ 2 N M I' it \ V m.b BELLEM-ME,WASNMTON SSOOI ,,��, �,\ih PARCEL GONr :1CRAG,KRUEGER h-gP.D. Z.MINIM 1 )4 4 4 Aft \m'��. THE EAST MALE OF TE vEST MALE OF THE NORTNIEST QtA STER OF SECTION N, �4 Ewe a M DERzu DEN.3.0( &114 P CIT•Q '/-- mama N wY'Oiw WANIERGSTCW EXCEPT TIORTH DE EASTmVAL CP TIDE NORTTTE HEAST GUN.AR ER OF TIE COUNTY, S .•,©Snell\mesew _ QUARTER OF TIE NORTMLLEeT QUARTER,AND EXCEPT TIE EAST 30 RET OF SAID • PREnISES CONvETED TO KNG COMP POI!ROAD;AND EXCEPT MAT PCRTICN �•u;�•(Tr� ,• \ 7,, CONDEMNED N KNG CONTY EPEIEOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER a32233, SITE STATISTICS Mom z, r//SIB : ��.��LIIp1�,..Plk e/ 3 ��/4_ =—_' = ��'I --_NORTH I IQE ISZNp 8T. BBENCM MMCD PERI CITY OF TWITCH SURVEY Q/NAVE,ISM DATIM TOT,SITE AREA E=XCEEc ACKS: IR CN1_D' SED GZc N I i`,. ♦ �t4�4.10 1 EC.484.11 OR(13erM METERS) N W 01,61 N I ill ` PTV 03•BRCIm1 BRASS SURFACE DISC.N DE NT.BE OWN ST.• ` ' ��,r�4'� I` \4/ . �.1- . DSTN 1 4 S.E. EXISTING ZONING R-6-North o1 SE DAd x G`1.��j EL SNISN OR 061013 I ETERS) R -South o1 Y 132M St —._--� _.- Y�,r•�0��/ -��/ _ ,-R STREET AREA, 103D AC,(DST OF 611E) ,s �� 4P4P1' ... OPEN SPACE Nw AC,(2Sx OF SITE) O y1 r I - cE. C QE6'EB ESTATE,_ 1• 4i W is-- ___ 1111111 11.2-LCI.LONOC7K114 14 Q. I-- Et w IE. 10 a ��/ �� d 1 ��r"PII 1la l� N Z O V /eV* .g.''h'--:::: luirtior Pr iliEll ' , / ftjIM E�� i(.4115, 'r-` _DIVISION 2__ 1.p210 4?�� LMqMq Srara rqrqr� k. W �c ------ �/®�A'M��V� AOQL - SOUTH OF BE.192ND 8T- C N 2— E4 r � yy M��l�!!f a��.... vi \ S Mvl``�iII Yy fl"� V I ® .10 - - _ ra' i.f . if.ur ,yam bg�TeTesvrmir I.. .LUGS C� L >•Y L.IIM a z,t.ivy INSTIIII ,A e EOM 1.. rj t tr g �c b Ml000w fI�1R1f.--- —e -- R E N T O N Ip'r■e■e�� ..;' =0 2 g Lf i�u GITl'LIMITS I _--- BRIM R §�[R�14. Oif= ^ 1 I i ^ ..n ^, A - ili1_ '. S IWy'YE 33YiYYGFY Ken""'". Ai �a't'.ri1 `t 92]SG;S+TuC$pZ t5 E ZCN.R-. % _to itilERRVY Nv Ali NMI iN}��cieteei. D J n i I n omfa M rr e1r EL; l l �e@�'�lveY vtJ 2 Z SHEET INDEX — Ir— ha�: " �Ig'I�, a>o o '� 1. i �'"� 1 et.,--�INICa- A J' IN'E' I�T SHEET or eVICINITY MAP ® NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP PROJECT1 4 N N ,.00at 10:ER NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. 50•1 ob x I rl yy . � - 6riol - - \ ast - ea DIM er. 2 y . �. I P za$S y , -yo- S 31 6 I y i 3 M y -Y 1. I 1 \ -11 , ll r .w... 1 21 -L- --J L R \ Lt� 1 y — I 1s i Y`I 1 i Q _ SCALE: 1" = 50' 1 I 'btl Pt ,\ - . _\ 1 I w '\ ill.11 OL` I vo. � 2 I I I 0 L J L J �i,, 1 � ar� sa �! igC r • 4Yb Y 1 3I I Y I J r 1 6g w I 8 I '42 .wiM Y Q I fo I Y 1 s .r I1 1 I 1 1 r I ter. I I I I II;III2 L-.2J A,_ L . b W C) r 6. s 2\ 22 , rnski HBrn11 J R CO • r zi i'i Zr 8y i iy J �... IA N I I I t I- m L Q O •1 7 1 1 .1 t --- / IiJiH --- ---46 •\ID' sNN'li'011U M wm1 Li I io.,s .7 n i i( rl ;rl i r —, r—p— •• so r- 1 i i I i^\; x1 Ii prp \ Q\`--w---J 1 i I i- t \ ' 1 I , 1 _ .. 9 Y I • y l .Vr,i %/^s,_r- 1 G O _ - v� T 1 n i ,M \~y P I N 1 `1!1 I 11 !! yy� _ I L I / }r Y 1 1 y �.. 1 wv. 1 I I \., I I ys.., :'^ 5 wV J l OR E '' T 2 J (� / 1 • I T 1 4 I t EN it J` J --� - LA 4 4 r--�ew---, 1 1 a-.__ i wnv.'.) .n.'...�J L--��---J \ .. J „ J -r - -L.' ''.'°. =J w 1 w 5 L1.�r. 1 31 0o I ---'\\ y 1 .» i Y --i-* b ,✓— ---I " 4 c v < a 1 v. I _ TRACT I y SHEET OF _ 1 1 J L . -Elm,su ii \ ,L__ys____J /i(�- b _ _ I 1 1 /I \ 2 4 n..00 / w.<Y�levf d.rele wo,H/ 1... 1� \\ Y i m.s. y I` J ow✓. i F 1 ww r. \`� ':1 �� - ' - / PA OJECT SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 9416E ER NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 e g a. �__ --� A 1 /;/ ---1 rn p. li '� L-- 4 ___ \+`__.. �_p- -- - - I / ' i._ �_..:,o---i- I N 1 Is I u.R J... - I i - b ' J y_{_ I \ � L-,pW p. I i I-1 1 I - -- SCALE: 1" 50� Y » Y --_�` _ ...� ,� r-.-Jan I Kn.u.l .� MALT ,I o ` Twit. \ /'; l \ E'2 1 I K r r /-- eo'..elaaeewe■pcTM Y 1 mp. i Y 1 �, OWu. I A wpp \I i I\ I „._•7 r ...., \ , . . /,. , ,. L__,____ . , i„ , , , _____ • .___ ,. / P r , 1 ,----t---- ,__..1.:*""- ' ' \ \ \ J Q. .- / / NGr7i'17y1 726Lr = L__ -/ r___` ___ T.v p. I \ EETLAND E ___ no -, i \ I \\\ \\\\ 4... I .r.r.\ / /, ''� ......,\,!.. l`` v' 1 :r D, it I lii wi3 ' r \\ ,..../ /...........,-. I' II z2' w"re..le / /\ ( I. \\ sn M. \\ 1 I I__ - / r I -- ��J -� • I S LrirrsIl �`II` ' -- / —...� \ \ e I 1' \\� �____� / / /- ` / _ _ = _ __ 1I j \ J 1 1 ;� II / 11 T"gcT� I I e'^ \W '\`� pt.p, r \ W. r /I I / .\ v.� f I I Q3 e . + / i` Or p.` 'I1 c p .9 / / y�[ i \ - `�J., / /. .� ' w•ANw�e[ewMa wtu .. / / � ' `Wb • I �, ..p[xA9cePE . ,��q� \ . �... �.. `J/ /� '/uETLAN A y I ESE, �x`'L.Mcre / u```r> / / / ) OL✓ E f' • ) i 2 ` I 1 J .., TO ea 'r:.. ��--'/ '�_ Tw.acT ,. /• 7 / (—iw..cr c 2 Zs. ,1. 11 s..t pig , I -,2-----, ,, <: `rr -- - \ / / - 7._ / �_ _ J ,R f 7 y►- aC •.pn ,b 1. / f - / 4 ~ Ft 1 I�s •I .:p r/r ^/ LLe. rr J L,,$,.,`` i / '/ - w I j _ )' 41 c �'! - ----J . -__/ i' �.' / % i %'' K _. /`' / / t 1 I Ii i I f O V A I1'{i `, % r - --7 J �, 1� 'I' / / f1 .ii w II as % ,1 : ? � RA ` I I . / I°.. / i y —f .\. I / / // / 1 L_-wo'-'J L _'F:I L.___..1 1.--\'-''- rIL_ - ngEA r\--1.2 1 1 oo l Q N . ; 043 �/II T1� I / / / / / // d p➢ 1 L _ 41 Io I } / 31 IS I r1 1 ss I Lwdr. I 2 / / r• lpo _ - �/ / / /I I p"p. I f-=-� l I pr l J /'/1 , . �_ r ___ /� , L, -.- 30 � J� 1 �' ! I � t i ( / / / I I'1 I rr. \ � / aP ' / Y _ .E ___il as 2 �� / t i ' ]o' , r .p.p I 1 1 I _ _ I/ a - � w `ymJ t-- ___' . -- / t uT�rtv aeTl L_ / / / Y B I Q1 I O - � .1. Ir I 1 o_--1 1` .i__ � µ 2. r_ _ r-J rou ue / / I K I ` @S P ' '� iil / ►EMn 4/ ; �/ 1 `I` , . __ j i---12 i i 1+ 1 1 ' � / / ;. I u , :Ir-L / /l I Z I o 0 < ti.47r ^ I L _� SHEET OF � a• I l7I I I r - y 1 I !# I � / I / I -� . .. ,I wn.n 4. I L-- I i 3 4 GEE SWEET 4 OF 4 •- 0Ja*1Qe E" 2.4sct 4' l6Is 99 a(a9 RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES FA PO Box 68562 Gary Spoon Lawrence Blake Seattle,WA 98168 16701 Se May Valley Rd 750 r Renton, WA 98059 Las VegasRoyal,NVCrest 89109Ci #455 Shigeki Marui Robert Petersen Ronald&Janice Knight 624 Motomachi-Dori 4 Chome Ch 14639 Se 132Nd St PO Box 6 KOBE Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98057 JAPAN William Wofford Joseph&Laurie Tarantola Ted Whitlock 13323 146Th Ave Se 23326 Se 254Th St 12637 148Th Ave Se Renton, WA 98059 Maple Valley,WA 98038 Renton,WA 98059 Al&Sally McEvoy J W MORRISON INC NOT AVAILABLE FROM COUN 18321 Se 147Th Pl PO Box 407 18631 120Th Ave Se Renton,WA 98059 Kenmore,WA 98028 Renton,WA 98058 Charles Lackey Mark&Lynnette Rogers Daniel Johnson PO Box 2198 15240 Se 132Nd St 15051 Se 128Th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 COLONY HOMES INC Lp Bales&BALES MANAGEME Randall&Rosemary Leifer 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 15201 Se 128Th St 5127 S Fountain St Bellevue,WA 98005 Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98178 KING COUNTY BALES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;BA Paul&Colleen Niemczyk 506 2Nd Ave 13401 156Th Ave Se 15320 Se 136Th St Seattle,WA 98104 Renton,WA .98059 , . Renton,WA 98059 Michael&Arlene Saito Chikai&Mitsuye Sakaguchi Durwood Blood 7630 S 115Th St 15203 Se 132Nd St ' 3711 Park Ave N Seattle,WA 98178 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056 Thomas Lambro&Lorene Ross Victoria Sanchez James Cox 15235 Se 132Nd St 14630 Se 132Nd St 14646 Se 132Nd St Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 NU WEST INC Henry Morgan Daniel&Susan Slaton 2125 112Th Ave Ne 13615 154Th Ave Se 15315 Se 133Rd Ct Renton,WA 98059 Bellevue,WA 98004 Renton,WA 98059 Joseph Alan Heerensperger Elizabeth Duff Carol Politte&Gerard McCn 15307 Se 133Rd Ct 15300 Se 133Rd Ct 15316 Se 133Rd St Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Garry Leach KING COUNTY REAL PROPERT 15308 Se 133Rd Ct 500 K C Admin Bldg Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98104 tl tl 41 / - d — ' I � • al. Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 20020311000303 1055 South Grady Way CITY OF RENTON BS 10.00 Renton, WA 98055 PACE 001 OF 002 KINGiCOUNTY,9WA5 fi''-i9/-P03 frP_q,9- c�ee, BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number:/42v5 9O/7 Project File#: Street Intersection: , Address: LUA-99-069 PP V NE 2Na Sr e NM.E Avt NE coo/ NE 47N ST. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. SURNSTERO Co/k/STRUcTION Co, 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation to 2. cm The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: cra WATER SYSTEM: N/A Length Size Type r (Jv rek' Pismo' '702 L.F.of Water Main �— L.F.of Water Main o L.F.of Water Main each of " Gate Valves cNI each of " Gate Valves each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies e.-.1 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Type — a`s6 7 /a 706 L.F.of f} " PVG Sewer Main 4.023 L.F.of /0 PVC, Sewer Main 306 L.F.of /2. PVC. Sewer Main 83 each of 4g " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type 6- a.$:' 7,568 L.F.of /? " Na. Storm Line /675 L.F.of /5 N/Z. Storm Line l/,62.1 L.F.of 24 " An2 Storm Line /4 each of /A/LE7 " CoNC Storm Inlet/Outlet 6/ each of TrPB / " CaNC. Storm Catch Basin 35 each of TYPE // " GONG Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk 20 Z60L.F. Asphalt Pavement: 357 000 SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles C7 By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. aOv,2 - roil/I.,, H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\84HNDOUT\BILLSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 Form 84 0001/bh IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Zi4Jvv+4.ttc; lX1uaXkic —) W . INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _ _ signed this instrument and acknowledged it#b s/her/their fro and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: era, REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and y, of to be the free and voluntary act of such © party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. N •O ••ccv Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) _ On this 0.10 day of*IV Ln(-ILYI ,yc)Zooi,before me personally appeared Wilts I 1 ( .1 ' •` G OW �e �r""7"" to me known to .s\ori EXQ/S be �it eJd.c. of the corporation that e°�s A �°® executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free ▪ !o„I, R r �N e and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein ®U - mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said ▪ a \ instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. ®� o®o i e`o�06 1'9 iiitRy°F.kApPSo�0 Notary Public in and for the tate of Washington Notary(Print) 'ah a ' "le-1 My appointment expires: S-ZS-0 3 Dated: 11(zo/o/ Page 2 /u•16�✓ •,-J K./Ma ' /Pt 77— UCev 7 ( Y' MAp&u"Vrt THE I:IRN S RECEWED MAR 1 9 2002 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, March 13, 2002 NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING City Of Renton Elizabeth Higgins 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Elizabeth: It is our understanding that you would like some assurances from us that we still intend to construct the walking trail through our Maplewood Estates plat. We have met with Harbour Homes to discuss the location of the trail that we plan to provide as part of Phase II of our Maplewood Estates project in Renton. Harbour Homes has agreed that the trail we will provide should accommodate the City's wants and needs for their park trail system. A reduced copy of our trail location plan has been attached as Exhibit A. We intend to dedicate the trail as part of the recording process for Phase II. In the event Phase II of Maplewood Estates has not recorded prior to the recording of Parkside Court by Harbour Homes, we will grant an easement to the City of Renton on our Western boundary, as shown on Exhibit B, for a trail easement. If you have any further questions please call me at(425)454-1900 ext. 233. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Respectfully, Ron Hughes, PE Project Manager Cc: Kurt Wilson, Harbour Homes 1215 120th Avenue N.E., Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 425 454 1900 Fax:425 454 4543 . '1.\ \ 4% ---1 V 1 7 �- O \ �' -- g \ Z `� i • r� ii.: CD 0' .r a w v :,: . 3Ntid3ivM ---'; ,d 1, ,e ),l�, •)C3 .......................... � • C4 19 a 9A1 if 1412K) (.4.4.31 "----" --' ' f.---"•---'—''''''..''.---------t----- f MEW I— CI 3'N "aAV� 311N - a "' _ �� tin+' •'•, 1 , .. .. •T�fl. ....,..uHiitic-iiit.:,..•....i. .,.1_^".441:th 1,1 \:4 ....._............ ,t3. OH . 1 0 ) .A.945, ': ,i , t •i •••• • :� to 1 ''•' • • •.• y J{ - ,.•4*. if I : .4. . • r, cat�! =�.---- - ;i 00. Il lei I ' a ^ 47 tB E[ 1J I 50 31 32 SJ • 14 _ At" • 14 IJ j ' jj1IEI1I ,y � 53 64 zi sa TRACT A MEN STAR 57 4. ) 'S '0 4k 441* i mAcr c ,, • � � OPEM 591� � :> J DEN d SPACE r w R e7 ` /*ANS 32ND ST _..._,�----,=- I 7e zox Iw TRACT f vA- itv _�_ ru1 SPACE 79 199 y °3 200 Mpg 95 v J 9e 51 . 19) 195 `, 205 t 82 Sal \V ^1 1% MEM S.E 1,j3RD PL. �P Cr) TRACT E l�\AJ 193 OPEN SPACE im 194 192 aIll 102 •4 - 109 '� A 2101* -i 19' w to 190 4, S , 10 . N 110 ma 11,40: S186 b 112 �}a � '°w 1y� 4'm.. r /0,, 1e1TRACTMCT 0 � 1R4s 111 : SE ki / ,47� 1716 1 1RALT N ,,,..,.........4 158 157 156 i. ffNCEII ,55 1K 15J ls2 145 •unu r TO OTT 09ue arr a'9erlan 1]1 133 1J4 1J3 1J6 .I ts7 Jv c /T/y, 'z^....-- 140 ,41 42 1� I SE 1�61I/ SJ I KEY MAP11 (TO v. = 200' _ I.. 11 JA > y + _. a e d .1d V C +�-1,4"1 • f"` '' a f• _ • . .. l_.41::1 ,,!..:7‘ -it-).,-_„., ••••,-. -,.. 4.•;•,_,-•fa$,•. -,--:- -44444 , ",..ti„. ta,-1.1,-.. - • .. a-- - : ir:',..:4-' ii..,.3.4,' , , 'L',',-, "fr" i. yy ♦ i D - ,y K. t4 : .i.- • 3 rFii,'y" = + -- .i•' zn r, .re:F f Y.F 'fr ,K "t#ti„ - hr y±a�p"��{ —4'. L +yF 7 i K- t S�AT ,. •'j a r s 4. ar !z . t=i„....== .. -, 4- 'a4a•— 4..1.......-11.;.4_--a--34, . , f,.,,,4!,,= " } . s ,. i :t '"., in ., . mom ` , ; N ;; -' Kti"+'�p1. rY W_! I < t to • 1'.' J .' f MtFe.� " ! A ..wte k: N +�` vy '1"L "�.•'i y 4 "'t 4t' h i I� agi '1` . • ',.--'‘g.--' L .0a--' r`... ';If a. ;.y.,,,-. : ,#-....zr_ ----",_'',': ..,:ii,:. *:-'..'" '44'1' 2 + Njit e . ' of +Y MC�'~¢ 1 -�. s rt " • • , 4, rx y. ;. }fir... • •' a ! ♦ r 7r t i -., i:� - a �,: t s a.,� i+ •} .l (icef .._„rL'. '-" ' fi'�i • �, ,' r$ Y � u yyX• y r.7 y+'�' 2, . '3td Cam ,a..._- 4 ^' ii' t .Y�''1 . v i i rI ,:y• ,± K:., ..sal % '�-i ` sJV._ }.. pia ' j a w M` g +tJ 3 y ; : • • Vie -` Y wa . �. :t �, # ,r ,1 c y 11 r HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT . *V 4. _;,. •i�' October 26, 1999 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Nat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V LOCATION: South of SE 128th,west of 152nd SW, east of 148 Ave SE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To subdivide 62.7 acres into 218 lots for single family residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on September 22, 1999. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the September 28, 1999 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 28, 1999,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Proposed phasing Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary plat map(3 pages) Exhibit No.5: Wetland mapExhibit No. 6: Revised preliminaryplat map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests approval to divide a 62.7 acre tract into 218 lots for development of detached single family residences. The site is relatively flat,undeveloped and covered by second and third growth forests. The property is located along the eastern edge of the City of Renton and is part of a recent annexation. The site has two zoning designations,R-5 which Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 2 is north of SE 132nd Street which bisects the site,and R-8 zone to the south of SE 132nd Street. Primary access to the site would be from 148th Avenue SE. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street provide internal access. There are 8 wetlands on the site,with 3 wetlands being hydrologically isolated and below 2,200 square feet. Applicant is proposing to fill those wetlands and compensatory mitigation is not required. The remaining wetlands are linear and narrow and traverse the site from the northeast corner to the southwest. Wetland A bisects the entire site and is 74,825 square feet. Wetlands A,B,C,D and E have been classified as Category 2 wetlands. There are five road crossings over these wetlands and the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetland to minimize impacts. The crossings would result in fill of 10,150 square feet of the wetlands and the applicant is proposing to create 36,119 square feet of wetlands adjacent to Wetland A. That exceeds the code requirement for impacts to Category 2 wetlands which is a 3:1 mitigation ratio. Category 2 wetlands require a 50 foot buffer width and the applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging. The impact would be to 47,969 square feet of buffer area and replacing it with 69,240 square feet of buffer area. There are two variance requests related to the road crossings pertaining to clearing and wetland buffer widths. The applicant is proposing a one acre park in the south central portion of the site which is adjacent to the large mitigation buffer area of Wetland A. There is an open space tract on the south of the site which will access the proposed adjacent King County Park site. There is a narrow access utility easement on the north which could also provide access for residents to NE 4th Street without coming out through the subdivision on 148th. The applicant is proposing phasing the project. The south portion of the site is phase 1,the north portion is phase 2, and the center portion is phase 3. It is estimated that phase 1 would be developed in the year 2000, phase 2 in 2001 and phase 3 in 2002. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS- M)with several mitigation measures attached. The mitigation measures included temporary erosion control, increased storm water detention,payment of traffic,fire and parks mitigation fees,installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th and 148th Avenue SE. There is a mitigation measure that the applicant must meet minimum fire flow requirements,and sprinklers would be required if the fire flow does not meet City standards. t' The Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation for the site is Residential Rural(RR)to the north of SE 132nd and Residential Single Family(RSF)to the south. There would be 74 single family lots in the RR zone which is also the R-5 zone, and 144 lots to the south in the RSF,R-8 zone. The proposal would have a net density of 4.25 dwelling units per acre in the R-5 zone and 4.64 dwelling units per acre in the R-8 zone. Minimum lot size in the R-5 zone is 7,200 square feet and 4,500 square feet in the R-8 zone. The proposed lot sizes in the R-5 zone range from 7,200 to 11,660 square feet. In the R-8 zone they range from 4,500 and 10,345 square feet. The proposed density in the R-8 portion of the site is below the minimum. The Zoning Administrator granted a waiver of the minimum density because of the size and location of the wetlands throughout the site. The lot dimension requirements are met for this project with the exception of Lots 7, 17,40,49 and 70,which do not meet minimum lot width due to averaging of the distance. They are all minor adjustments to the plat,and staff is recommending that the applicant revise the plan to meet the minimum lot width. Subdivision regulations such as lot arrangement and minimum area are met with this proposal. There are several proposed pipestem lots and they meet the required standards regarding width and setbacks. There are two areas with adjacent pipestem lots with a shared common driveway,and staff is recommending a condition that the applicant record a covenant for maintenance of those shared driveways. Staff is also recommending a condition that the applicant record access easements and maintenance agreement for all of the lots that gain access from private streets and Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. • Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 3 driveways. There are several private access utility easements that extend off public streets to access lots,and I, applicant is required to increase the width of those easements to 26 feet where more than two lots are served. A traffic impact analysis was prepared which analyzed level of service impacts at intersections that would be affected, including 148th Avenue SE and SE 128th Street, 156th SE and SE 128th,and Duvall Avenue and NE 4th. The traffic consultant indicated that traffic operations at the intersection of 148th SE and SE 128th would deteriorate to warrant signalization in the near future,not only from this development but including all other development in this area. The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,123 average daily vehicle trips. A wetland evaluation was prepared for the site. The applicant is proposing a 36,119 square foot mitigation area directly adjacent to Wetland A which would require very little excavation. Wetland A with the adjacent mitigation area and wetland buffers would form a large open space area in the center of the site. Mr. Rosen described in detail the wetland and wetland buffer requirements and the impacts to this particular site. The site was annexed to the City in 1998 and the surrounding area is developing at urban densities due to the recent availability of urban services including sewer. The site is surrounded by mixed lot sizes in the 5 to 10 acre range as well as subdivisions of more urban densities. Police and Fire Departments have indicated that sufficient resources exist to provide services to this proposed development. The site is located in both the Issaquah and Renton School Districts,and the City has agreed to collect a school impact fee of$2,797 per residence for the Issaquah School District within its district boundaries. It is anticipated there would be approximately 96 school age children resulting from this subdivision. The storm drainage system consists of a detention pond in the southwest corner of the site,and it would be designed to retain water as a pond amenity and be sized for water quality treatment. The discharge would enter an existing swale that flows adjacent to the southwest property corner. The proposed development would be required to install a new 12 inch sewer main in 148th Avenue SE from SE 128th Street. There would be a need for a lift station in the south portion of the site. King County Water District No. 90 would provide water service to the project. The street improvements include a 50 foot right-of-way width for 132nd and the other public streets would have a minimum 42 foot right-of-way width. All the internal streets would be improved with 32 feet of pavement,curbs,gutters, sidewalks and lighting. The cul-de-sacs would be platted to a minimum 50 foot radius and paved to a minimum 45 foot radius. King County Parks and Renton Parks are working together to link the County park property to the south of the site with other properties to the northeast as part of the County's regional Cedar River to Sammamish trail system. The ERC recommended that the applicant work with the County to provide a trail easement from the adjacent park and the other County-owned parcels. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures; (2)Lots 7, 17,40,49 and 70 in the R-8 zoned area of the site do not comply with the minimum lot width and applicant should revise the plans to meet the minimum lot width standards; (3)Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zoned area are adjacent pipestem lots,and the applicant should record a restricted covenant on these lots to require shared access driveways and require common maintenance of the driveways; (4)the applicant should widen access easements serving Lots 21-26, Lots 15-20,Lots 133-138,Lots 105-109 and Lots 139-144 to a 26-foot easement width in order to meet private street standards; (5)applicant should record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain access from private streets; (6)applicant should record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common storm water facility;(7)applicant should create a homeowners association to be responsible for Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 4 maintaining the common open space areas on the site;(8)applicant should pay a school impact fee on behalf of 11 the Issaquah School District for all new single residences within its district boundaries. As noted earlier,the applicant is requesting two variances associated with the proposal which deal with the road crossings over the wetlands and intermittent streams. One variance is from the tree cutting and land clearing regulations and the other from wetland regulations which would require a minimum 50 foot buffer width for the wetlands. Various alternatives were investigated for mitigating for the reduced buffer width. Most of the wetlands on the site have intermittent streams which run through them seasonally and have no potential for salmon use. Mr. Rosen detailed the criteria for variances from wetlands and the applicant's response, including hardship because of special circumstances such as size, shape,topography, location; granting of the variance would not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to property; no economically feasible alternative with less impact on the wetland is physically and/or legally possible;there is no feasible on-site alternative. He also explained the tree cutting and land clearing variance requirements. Staff recommends approval of the two variance requests. Craig Krueger, 4205 148th Avenue NE,#200,Bellevue,Washington 98007,applicant representative herein, concurred with the staff report and the recommended conditions. He also entered Exhibit 6 which indicates the revised lot widths as recommended by staff. Vince Geglia,2101 112th Avenue NE,#110,Bellevue, Washington 98004,applicant's traffic consultant, explained that the intersection of 148th and SE 128th Streets will carry the majority of the traffic generated by this plat and the new signal would allow access to be made in a safe and efficient manner. All other intersections analyzed performed at acceptable levels of service with future conditions. Garet Munger, 12525 Willows Road,#101,Kirkland,Washington 98034,applicant's wetlands consultant, in response to earlier questions regarding the affect of filling the three small unrelated wetlands, stated that that would be compensated in large part by the proposed mitigation. Regarding the affect of the road crossings over the wetlands, it was concluded after a site inspection with a representative from the State Fish&Wildlife that the oversized culverts should provide transmission of water across the road crossings. Mr. Munger testified further regarding hydrologic support to the wetlands,provisions for surface water runoff,protection of the wetlands by way of fencing,and the variance requests. Shirley Day, 14412 167th Place SE,Renton,Washington 98059,interested party herein,expressed concern regarding the traffic impact,not only from this project but others in the area. She was also concerned about the storm water and drainage and stated that at times on 148th the road has been closed due to excessive flooding. Jim McDougal, 14502 167th Place SE,Renton,Washington 98059,interested party herein,expressed his concern regarding the storm water runoff,particularly during December,January and February of each year. Mr.McDougal asked if the sizing of the storm water system for this project is adequate,and what provision has been made for flooding to homeowners in the surrounding area. Laurie Tarentola, 14606 SE 136th,Renton,Washington 98059, interested party herein, gave a brief history of the development of the area and its storm water problems. She appreciated that the mitigation for the wetlands for this particular plat had been addressed,but was concerned that with the loss of pervious surfaces and the culverts diverting the increased flow to remaining wetlands,that the surrounding area would be adversely affected. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 5 She also suggested that 148th Street be continued all the way to the King County Park south of the site. She also disagreed that granting of the variance would not affect the use of surrounding properties,but that it would create a hardship to property owners located to the west and south of the plat. Elizabeth Duff, 15300 SE 133rd Court,Renton,Washington 98059, interested party herein, stated that her property faces the proposed project. One of the main reasons for purchasing her home was its view of trees,and not looking directly onto her neighbors'homes. She expressed her concern regarding the impact of the proposal on her home and her present quality of life. She suggested that the lots directly facing her property be left as a natural greenbelt. • Sally Nipert, 14004 156th Avenue SE,Renton,Washington 98059, interested party herein, expressed her concern and frustration about the traffic coming from this development onto 156th. It is the only road down from the hill to the Maple Valley Highway and the traffic now is so bad that people cannot get out of their driveways. Developments are being planned but traffic routes are not being made available. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055,responded regarding street grid systems. No access has been made to 128th in order to minimize the number of connections onto 128th. If and when the property to the east is developed, it can be connected through this development. Mr. Watts listed several reasons the City did not require extending 148th further south of 132nd,including wetland encroachments,future park access and legal issues. The traffic issues in this general area and the expected growth from this and other developments was addressed. Mr. Watts also responded to questions regarding storm water management issues, street improvements and wetland hydrology. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:50 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: 1. The applicant,Ron Hughes,Burnstead Construction Company,filed a request for approval of a 218 lot single family plat together with two variances that would permit roads to cross stream or wetland corridors. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 6 5. The subject site is at the eastern edge of the City and was recently annexed to the City. The City boundary runs along the south,east and portions of the west property lines of the subject site with King County R-4 zoning located in these areas. 6. The subject site is generally located southeast of the intersection of NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street in King County)and 148th Avenue SE. In addition to being bounded by those two streets on the north and west respectively,the site is bounded on the south by SE 136th Street and on the east by 152nd Street. A dogleg extends north to NE 4th Street from the main parcel with a few separate parcels located between portions of the northern boundary of the site and NE 4th. 7. The parcel is approximately 62.73 acres. The parcel is approximately 1,277.42 feet wide(east to west) and 2,582.62 feet long. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4760 in December 1998. The site received its zoning with annexation. 9. The Zoning designations applicable to the subject site were adopted in June 1993 with the passage of Ordinance 4404. 10. The subject site has two zoning designations. The area generally north of SE 132nd Street is zoned R-5 (Single Family Residential/5 lots per acre). The rest of the site, south of 132nd, is zoned R-8(Single Family Residential/8 lots per acre). 11. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of rural residential and single family residential uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 12. The parcel slopes downward approximately 100 feet,from approximately 500 feet in the northeast corner of the site to approximately 395 feet in the southwest corner,but over the site's area it appears generally level with some lower areas of swales and depressions. The slopes generally range from approximately 2%to 8%with some small areas over 10%. 13. The lower areas of the site are wetlands or stream corridors. The wetland evaluation found 8(eight) wetlands on the site. The larger wetlands appear to be linear and contain stream or swale-like characteristics. Five of the wetlands will be preserved while three of the wetlands fall below preservation levels for Category 2 wetlands and would be filled. (see below) 14. The applicant proposes developing the 218 lot plat in three(3)phases. The phases do not break out lot numbers in any orderly fashion. The phases are divided by road or terrain features. The phases would be developed as follows: Phase 1 is located in the southeast third of the site generallysouth and east of the intersection sect on of SE 132nd Street and the Wetland A corridor. It would be developed in 2000. Phase 2 is located in the northeast third of the subject site. It can generally be defined by the alignment of SE 132nd on the south and the eastern edge of the western dogleg. It would be developed in 2001. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 7 Phase 3 is located in the western third of the site and straddles SE 132nd Street. It would be developed during 2002. 15. The applicant proposes 74 lots on the R-5 zoned portion of the site and 144 lots on the R-8 zoned portion of the site. The R-5 zone requires lots with a minimum area of 7,200 square feet and a maximum density of 5 lots per acre. The R-8 zone requires lots with a minimum area of 4,500 square feet and a density between 5 and 8 lots per acre. Both zones require a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots and a 65 foot lot depth. 16. The lots in the R-5 zone range in size from 7,200 to 11,660 square feet. The lots in the R-8 zone range from 4,500 square feet to 10,345 square feet. These lot sizes meet the requirements of their respective zones. 17. As originally submitted,Proposed lots 7(narrow front width), 17(narrow front width),40(narrow corner lot),49(narrow front width)and 70(narrow corner lot)did not meet the lot width standards. 1 18. The plat has a net density of 4.24 in the R-5 portion of the site and 4.64 in the R-8. It does not meet the density requirements and the applicant applied to the Zoning Administrator to differ from the minimum due to the constraints imposed by the size and shape of the numerous wetlands and wetland buffers that divide the site. The Administrator approved the proposed density. 19. Staff has analyzed the various pipestems, shared driveways and easement accesses. Staff noted that some of those accesses do not meet City standards. They would have to be 26 feet wide if they serve more than two(2)lots. Those at issue include the ones serving Proposed Lots 121 through 126,Lots 115 through 120,Lots 133 through 138 in the one portion of the plat and Lots 105 through 109 and Lots 139 through 144 in the R-8 zone. Lots with adjacent pipestems must create a shared,minimum driveway of 12 feet. Lots encumbered by this limitation are proposed Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zone and Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zone. 20. Most of the lots are created at perpendicular angles to streets but some curves and cul-de-sac as well as the location of wetland areas do require some off-angle lot lines. 21. The transportation analysis indicates that the development would generate approximately 2,123 additional trips when the plat is fully developed. Typically,approximately 10 percent(10%)of these trips occur in each of the peak rush hour times. The report indicated that while most of the surrounding roads can handle the additional traffic,the intersection of SE 128th and 148th Avenue SE would be degraded and warrant a traffic signal. The ERC required the applicant to provide the signal. 22. The applicant will be developing SE 132nd Street through the center of the site connecting 148th on the west with 152nd on the east. In addition,a number of looped streets will be created north and south of 132nd. Two cul-de-sacs will be created south of 132nd. Stub roadways will run to the property line at the southeast corner of the site and at the northwest and north-central dogleg portions of the site. City standard improvements will be required. SE 128th will be required to provide a width as determined by the City. Similarly,the roads surrounding the site will need improvement including widening and curbs, gutters and sidewalks as determined by staff. Some of these roadways will be crossing the wetland or wetland buffer areas,generally at narrow sections of those features.(see below) Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 8 23. The subject site falls into both the Issaquah and Renton School Districts. The City has adopted a mitigation fee program for the Issaquah District at their request. No mitigation is required within the Renton School District boundaries. The plat will generate approximately 96 students spread throughout the grade range. The Issaquah fee will be$2,797.00 per residence within the appropriate boundary. 24. There are eight wetlands on the site. They are generally classified as palustrine forested wetlands. They contain a variety of broadleaf plants with some flowing or standing water or seasonal hydrology or soils helping to characterize them as wetlands. 25. Wetland A is 74,825 square feet. It is a northeast to southwest linear swale that begins off the site to the east, runs across the center of the site and runs across adjacent property to the west and eventually to Maplewood Creek and the Cedar River. Wetland B is 13,414 square feet. It runs in the same general alignment as and slightly north of Wetland A. Similarly, Wetland C to which Wetland B flows, is aligned north of Wetland A. Wetland C is 11,707 square feet. Wetland D is 8,996 square feet. It is located near the south third of the site and straddles the eastern boundary property line. Wetland E is located in the northwest corner of the subject site. It is 46,567 square feet. 26. These five wetlands would be preserved and buffers established to protect them. There would be some filling in and around some of the protected wetlands or buffers to allow the construction of access roadways on the site. (see variance requests) 27. Wetland F(2,075 square feet) is located centrally near the south property line. Wetland G(1,898 square feet)is located near the east property line and is centered north to south along that line. Wetland H (1,763 square feet)is located near the west property line in what would be the SE 132nd street corridor. The wetlands ordinance does not require protection or mitigation of these wetlands. There was no information on how much storage capacity these combined sites hold. The ERC did require additional storm water storage capacity and retention due to the flow problems at Maplewood Creek downstream of the site. 28 In order to develop the road system the applicant will be crossing the wetlands and their buffers. Approximately 10,150 square feet of Category 2 wetlands will be filled to allow road construction. To compensate for these filled wetland areas,as permitted by the Wetlands Ordinance,the applicant will be creating 36,119 square feet of new wetlands. The major wetland creation will be done adjacent to Wetland A. In addition,as also permitted by the Wetlands Ordinance,the applicant has proposed buffer averaging to reduce the required 50 foot buffer required around Category 2 wetlands. Approximately 68,679 square feet of buffer area will be shifted with compensation of 69,240 square feet. The compensation is spread around the wetlands but a large buffer compensation area will be created . between Wetlands A and B creating a larger,more contiguous habitat area. 29 The buffer width in the reduced areas will still be a minimum of 25 feet except in the areas where the road crossings occur. Approximately 20,710 feet of buffer will be altered by roadway construction. The applicant has requested a variance to permit the roadway crossings. 30. In addition to the buffer areas affected by roads,the roads will cross the site's stream corridors necessitating the removal of vegetation. The Tree Cutting and Land Clearing regulations prohibit clearing within 25 feet of the ordinary high water mark of creeks. The applicant has requested a variance to allow the roadway construction. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 9 31. The plat will have a series of linked wetlands,protective buffers and an open space park to provide on- site recreational amenities. An approximately one acre park will be created in the south central portion of the plat. It will be adjoining Wetland A and its buffers. PI 32. There will be a 2.33 acre storm water detention pond developed in the southwest corner of the plat. As noted above,the ERC required additional detention to avoid further problems downstream in the Maplewood Creek system. There will be water quality treatment. Some storm flows will be redirected to recharge the wetland areas. 33. The City will be providing sanitary sewer service to the site. A lift station will be required to pump sewer waste to the gravity system. Domestic water will be provided by King County Water District #90. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Since the plat requires two variances to allow the proposed subdivision,the variances will be discussed first. In order to provide access to this large site which contains five critical wetlands,two of which cross large diagonal portions of the site,five stream or wetland areas will be crossed by roads. Variance to reduce 50 foot wetland buffer 2. Variances from the wetland provisions may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape,topography,or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. There is no viable economic alternative; d. There is no feasible alternative including density reduction,changing in timing or other design changes; e. The changes are the minimum and the hydrology is not adversely affected or is improved; f. Endangered and other threatened species are not jeopardized; g. Ground water or surface quality will not be degraded;and h. Wetland impacts have been minimized. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 10 II 3. The long, linear wetlands as well as the limited roadways south of the site where topography limits access,combine to make developing the site and providing safe and reasonable access difficult. This proposal appears to provide a reasonable compromise. It preserves larger wetlands, increases buffers in some areas while reducing buffers where necessary to provide road crossings,and creates larger habitat areas by merging adjoining wetland groups in the center of the site. 4. The applicant has already reduced the density of the plat to below what is generally required to work around the wetlands, streams and buffers. In the main, it appears that wetland characteristics are reasonably preserved. While culverts will be used under the roadways,it appears this is a reasonable method of tying wetlands together since vegetation would probably not persist under the roadways in any event. 5. The public should not be harmed by the approval of the variance. The variance will not alter storm water holding capacity of the site which could affect downstream properties. In an odd fashion,the variance will permit the public to more closely observe the wetlands which are otherwise internalized and surrounded by wide buffers. 6. It appears that a variety of design considerations already were reviewed to provide both viable wetland preservation and reasonable although already reduced development potential. 7. The crossings have been located at narrow sections of the wetlands and the wetlands plan appears to provide reasonable recharge of the wetlands with storm flow. Water quality treatment is provided by the storm water system. It is possible that rooftop water might be needed to recharge and this should be investigated as it is generally cleaner than surface flows from driveways or roadways. 8. There is no way that a site such as the subject site can be reasonably developed without having some impact on its wetlands and required buffers. The City's ordinances allow for reasonable development using a combined compensation and compromise system to avoid thwarting all use but protecting the most critical wetland areas. Variance to allow clearing along streams 9. The criteria to allow the clearing along the streams are a more limited subset of those found above and include the following criteria: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape,topography,or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. 1.1 Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 11 The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 10. Development of a reasonable road system will require some intrusion into the stream corridor and its vegetative edges. The same linear wetlands discussed in the wetland buffer variance create the same hardship that justify a variance from the clearing regulations. Streams run through the linear wetlands and trees and shrubs located in these areas will be disturbed if a road system is to be constructed that allows reasonable use of the subject site. 11. The applicant is preserving large areas of the site in natural open space including a park,wetlands and wetland buffers. The removal of vegetation in the road crossing areas will not harm either the general public or other properties in the vicinity. Again,the applicant is providing additional storm water storage capacity so that the loss of the water storage or holding capacity of the vegetation should not adversely affect surrounding areas. 12. The removal of vegetation to allow roadway development to serve development and emergency services has been permitted in other situations where reasonable development would have been otherwise hampered. Approval will not grant the applicant a special privilege. 13. The corridors chosen for the roads are generally confined to the narrowest crossings and to the minimum number needed to provide access to this large parcel. 14. If the City is to accommodate a reasonable population,development of more sensitive sites will require some tradeoffs. In this case,the applicant will be providing approximately 15 acres,or a little less than 25 percent of the total site area,as wetlands,buffers and other open space. The applicant has also attempted to design these roads to cross the wetlands at their narrowest dimensions minimizing as best as possible the intrusions. Both variances appear reasonable. Preliminary Plat 15. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat provides a wide range of lot sizes to cater to a variety of single family interests. The plat preserves the larger wetlands,creates buffers and provides additional open space. Approximately 25 percent of the site will be open space. 16. The site can be served by water and sewer service. The site will provide storm water control and wetland recharge. The site is located in a sensitive drainage basin and the plat accommodates this by preserving the larger wetlands and creating appropriately sized holding facilities. The development should not exacerbate existing conditions, although it will not necessarily solve any existing problems. 17. The site will mitigate to some extent the additional traffic by providing an appropriate signal and pay mitigation fees to cover other improvements to the transportation system. That is not to say that the additional approximately 2,000 trips will not create perceptible impacts in the area. 18. Similarly,the development of over 200 homes will change a quiet area into one of suburban housing and its attendant increases in population and light and sounds. 19. The subdivision does not exactly meet the density envisioned by the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan,but some compromises from those standards were generally unavoidable due to the large amount of wetlands on the site and the buffers required around those wetlands. The site provides a good mix of Ron Hughes - Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 12 lot sizes due to the mix of R-5 and R-8 zoning that applies to the site. The applicant will have to revise those lots which staff noted did not meet lot width or pipestem or access regulations of the City. 20. The plat will be providing mitigation not only for its traffic impacts but its impacts on the Fire Department and the parks of the City as well as its impacts on the Issaquah School system. This is the first plat covered by the City's endorsement of mitigating impacts on a school system. 21. The interior street system appears to provide a reasonable extension of the City's grid street system while protecting the wetlands. Those lots accessed by private access roadways do have reduced usable yard and open space on lots served by these systems. The City Council might want to review this situation since in some cases yards,particularly front yards,are substantially reduced leaving not much more than a paved driveway or turnaround serving as the front yard. 22. The development is in an area which has appropriate services available. It will increase the tax base of the City and as noted provides a reasonable selection of lot sizes for those who want larger or smaller single family parcels. 23. The plat does a reasonable job of protecting the wetlands while providing needed access. 24. There will be stub streets that will eventually create through links to other areas. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each such street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 25. The plat shall contain language clearly defining the limitations on access to the wetlands that border the new single family homes. Similarly,signs shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the ERC threshold determination prior to recording of the subdivision. 2. Lots 7, 17,40,49 and 70 in the R-8 zones area of the site do not comply with the minimum lot width standard of the R-8 zone. The applicant shall revise plans to meet the minimum lot width standard. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 3. Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zones area are adjacent pipestem lots. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on these lots to require a shared access driveway and to require common maintenance of the driveway. The restrictive covenant shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recordingthe plat. • Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 13 4. The applicant shall widen the access easements serving Lots 121 through 126,Lots 115 through 120, Lots 133 through 138,Lots 105 through 109,and Lots 139 through 144,all located in the R-8 zone,to a 26 foot easement width in order to meet private street standards. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain access from the private streets. The easement and agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common storm water facility. The agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall create a homeowners association to be responsible for maintaining the common open space areas on the site. 8. The applicant shall pay a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District equal to$2,797 per residence,for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that are also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. It is possible that rooftop water might be needed to recharge the wetlands,and this should be investigated as it is generally cleaner than surface flows from driveways or roadways. 10. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each stub street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 11. The applicant shall erect signs that shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 12. The applicant shall erect fences between private lots and adjoining wetlands. The Variances are approved subject to the approval of the Preliminary Plat and the conditions applied to the plat. ORDERED THIS 26th day of October, 1999. n FRED J. KAUF HEARING EXAM Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 14 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1999 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Craig Krueger Vince Geglia 1055 S Grady Way 4205 148th Avenue NE, #200 2101 112th Ave NE,#110 Renton,WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98007 Bellevue,WA 98004 Garet Munger Shirley Day Jim McDougal 12525 Willows Road,#101 14412 167th Place SE 14502 167th Place SE Kirkland, Washington 98034 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Laurie Tarentola Elizabeth Duff Sally Nipert 14606 SE 136th 15300 SE 133rd Court 14004 156th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Neil Watts Ron Hughes Claudia Donnelly 1055 S Grady Way Burnstead Construction 10415 147th Ave SE Renton,WA 98055 1215 120th Avenue NE,#201 Renton,WA 98059 Bellevue,WA 98005 Teresa LeMay Ron Noreen Mrs. Harold Reynolds 1203 114th Ave SE P.O.Box 1554 13016 156th Ave SE Bellevue,WA 98004 Auburn,WA 98071 Renton,WA 98059 David Stanley Roger Pinkley 64 Rainier Ave S, Suite F 15130 SE 141st P1 Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98059 TRANSMI TIED THIS 26th day of October, 1999 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Econ.Dev. Director Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,November 9, 1999. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 15 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. , , IPF FFA f FOR2_ PRACTICES APPLICATION/NO___ ICATION i PROCESS AND CONDITIONS Date Received: Review Comments Due: Final Due Date: Shutdown Zone: 5— -D' —CC C ,S--C (: -—C ) C 5 NAME LANDOWNER NAME OF TIMBER OWNER NAME OF OPERATOR SUBDIVISION I SECTION(S) TWP Nth RGE E/W CLASS OF APPLICATION !`\,Z �'•- (` r,Z .1 1:i ❑ CLASS II ❑ CLASS III ❑ CLASS III-T Type of Operation Acres/Mi es CLASS IV-G _C___ R ` . -C_ 1.1 CLASS IV-S ❑ APPLICATION APPROVED CONDITIONS TO THIS APPLICATION / NOTIFICATION THIS OPERATION REQUIRES Hydraulics Project Approval ❑ Compl'ance vd approval Conditions ❑ Environmental Checklist ❑ ompleted FPA Form Map Other \ <' C APPROVAL CONDITIONS: , DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 3 2000 RECEIVED El PRE-FILE REVIEW COMPLETE ❑ APPLICATION INCOMPLETE ❑ APPLICATION COMPLETE ❑ APPLICATION ON HOLD ❑ APPLICATION DISAPPROVED DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: INITIAL: 1 REGION: AGENCY COPIES SENT: FINAL COPIES SENT: EFFECTIVE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: COPIES DISTRIBUTED TO: .JJ---FfFORESTER 1:-EtOLOGY 0-FISHERIES LIF AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: L-v�� \'� AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: \\\\\\ AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: FORM DNR QQ - 27 (9-95) I i ' '' , sE:Miatimawava FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION / NOTIFICATION ' . I. GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION ' 'A `•Uktitanalli`:` ` tA REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO ASSIST IN THE COMPLETION OF THIS FORM. TYPE OR PRINT IN PERMANENT INK. 1. FULL LEGAL NAME AND/OR 2: FULL LEGAL NAME AND/OR 3. FULL LEGAL NAME AND/OR • COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF aNp COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF TIMBER OWNER COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF OPERATOR Burnstead Construction o� C . , a Washington Corporation, success- same as land owner SAHc. Af 4Av/P owN � ors by merger to Finer Homes In:_-. a. Washington Corporation. - BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS 1215 120th Avenue NE #201 - CITY STATE • ZIP CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP Bellevue WA 98004 PHONE: I a9c). asa-i qnn x 233 PHONE ( ) PHONE: ( 1 Unified Business Identifier[or SSN I) UBI [] Unified Business Identifier(or SSN t) UBI [] Unified Business Identifier(or SSN it) UBI [] SSN [1 SSN [1 SSN [] • 4.TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY [X CORPORATION 11-SOLE PROPRIETOR . [1 CORPORATION I 1 SOLE PROPRIETOR I] CORPORATION [] SOLE,PROPRIETOR II PARTNERSHIP [1 PARTNERSHIP Cl PARTNERSHIP [] OTHER(specify): [] OTHER(specify): [1 OTHER(specify): 5. FOREST TAX REPORT NT NUMBER: I SOO O54 354 1 For tax reporting information or tax numbers call 1-800-548-8829. 6. El YES [ ] - IS THE OPERATIO WITHIN CITY UMITS? 6A. COUNTY Kinu NAME OF ITY(s): Renton 7. [ ] YES NO - IS THE OPERATION WITHIN A PUBUC PARK? If yes, an Environmental Checklist is required. [ ] YES 0 - IS THE OP TiON WITHIN 500 FEET OF A PUBUC PARK? NAME OF PARK: 8 a. LEGAL SUB-DIVISION OF OPERATIONIS): 8 b. PARCEL OR LOT NUMBER: SUB-DIVISION (1/4, 1/4) SECTION TWP RANGE A GE(W) • LAR PARCEL OR TA(EX NW 1/4, NW 1/4 14 23N 5E ! 142305-9017-04 Nu/ V4., ,v,.,, % /4 231J 5 E - 142505-9o05-0S • AI %Q-, Nw 1/4 /4 23N 5E /42305 - 9004-09 9. [ ] YES [A NO - 'WAS THE LAND PLATTED AFTER JANUARY 1, 1960 (INCLUDING SHORT PLATS)? (You May Contact County Assessor for Verification). If Yes, Environmental Checklist Is Required. 10. (4 YES ( 1 NO - LANDOWNER INTENDS TO CLEAR, IMPROVE OR DEVELOP LAND WITHIN THREE YEARS? NOTE: 1. If yes, attach a completed Environmental Checklist. A7 7'ACi'E0 2. A local government clearing and/or grading permit may be required. 3. See the instructions for more information relating to conversions. THE FOLLOWING IS PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION: If the Forest Practices Application or Notification does not state that there is an intent to convert the forest land to non-forestry uses the county, city, town or regional governments may den any permits or approvals for conversion to non-forestry land uses for a period of six (6) years from the date of the applica � Ioq• See the instructions under item # 10, and regulations, including but not limited to, RCW 76.09.060, D) RCW 76.09.170(7), WAC 222-20-010, WAC 222-20-040 and 222-20-050. 11. [ 1 YES [I NO - DO YOU HAVE AN APPROVED CONVERSION OPTkAI t' art; Etii[„'N,(COHP ' ' 18 2000 If yes, include a copy of the approved plan. NOTE: Not all Local Governme .... ! HP s. MAY 22 2000 . ipmna �S� 11I;di[n_c�in(-- 1 (For FPA Fee Information see the InstrOns) II. WATER SECTION 2 4 0 7 1 4 3 All work within Type 1-3 Waters will-require a Hydraulics Project Approval (HPA). Work within Type 4-5 Waters may require an HPA. Completion of this section will serve as your request for an HPA from the Department of Fish and Wildlife. If you are operating within 200 feet of a Type 1 or 1 + Water, contact the local government for shoreline management information. 12. [ ] YES N] NO WILL THERE BE ANY ACTIVITIES THAT WILL BE WITHIN OR OVER THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF ANY WATER? (If you will not be working in or above any typed water, go to question 13.) If YES, check (✓) the activities you will be doing in each type of water. The location of all culverts and bridges must be shown on the base map. Culvert Base Map information must include culvert diameter. Bridge location information must show whether the bridge is temporary or permanent. (For Water Type information see WAC 222-16-030. TA] YES [ ] NO - Are all waters shown on the Base Map. (If No, please show all unmarked water locations.) (A) (B) (C) (DI (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Water Road Water Falling & Cable Suspending Ground Operate Apply Other Activity Type Const. Crossing Bucking Yarding Cables Skidding Other •Chemicals (Show under Over (Skidder or Equipment question 29) Water Tractor) 1 1 • 2 • 3 • • 5 - - 13. [ ] YES )K] NO . - WILL THERE BE ANY ACTIVITIES WITHIN 200 FEET OF A TYPE 1 - 3 WATERS? FEET If Yes, how close? (Measure all distances horizontally.) Show the location of all Riparian Management Zones (RMZs) on the Base Map. (See WAC Chapter 222-30.) 14. [ ] YES ] NO - WILL THERE BE ANY ACTIVITIES WITHIN 25 FEET OF TYPE 4-5 WATERS? 15. [ ] YES (] NO - ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY WATER INTAKES IN YOUR UNIT OR WITHIN 1/2 MILE DOWNSTREAM OF THIS OPERATION? 16. [ ] YES K] NO - WILL YOU BE REMOVING TREES WITHIN THE MAXIMUM WIDTH RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONE? (For maximum Width Riparian Zone Information see WAC 222-30-020(3) and (4).) (For Information Relating to Shade Requirements see WAC 222-30-040.) • III. WETLAND SECTION 17. [A YES [ ] NO - DO WETLANDS EXIST INSIDE OR WITHIN 200 FEET (horizontally) OF YOUR PROPOSED FOREST PRACTICES BOUNDARY? (If wetlands do not exist within or around this application go to Section IV.) If YES, show the location and classification of all Wetlands and Wetland Management Zones on the Base Map, and check ( ✓ ) the appropriate squares in the following table describing your work within a Wetland or Wetland Management Zone. (For wetland typing information see WAC 222-16-035.) Wetland (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Road Water Falling & Cable Suspending Ground Operate Apply Other Type Constr. Crossing Bucking Yarding Cables Over Skidding Other Chemicals (Show under Wetlands (Skidder or Equipment question 29) Tractor) A B Forested X - • 18. Di YES [ ] NO - WILL YOUR PROJECT BE FILLING OR DRAINING A WETLAND? 1 0.21 ACRES) If Yes, how many acres will you be filling or draining? (Enter acreage to the nearest 1/10 acre) A mitigation plan and a SEPA checklist must accompany this application if you are filling or draining more than 1/2 acre of any wetland. • FORM DNR QQ-19 (1-95) 2 , , , ...., k III III . . , . , •t . IV. ROAD SECTION 5L� �]7 TNc166P 7774-L s,(ie,�r i�icwii✓E f10f D� LOT�. • 19. [ ] YES [ENO - IS THERE ANY ROAD WORK OR ROCK PIT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION: (If YES, complete all blocks that apply and LABEL EACH TYPES SEPARATELY ON MAP.) (If you will not be doing any work involving roads go to Section V.) TYPE OF ACTIVITY TOTAL LENGTH • TOTAL LENGTH OF. STEEPEST SIDE IN FEET ENDHAUL/OVERHAUL SLOPE ROAD (no sidecast) CROSSES CONSTRUCTION (in percent) Show All Locations On Map `Y NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION Z c'c C l Ay J /v [] EXISTING ROAD RECONSTRUCTION (]EXISTING ROAD MAINTENANCE 1] ROAD ABANDONMENT(Provide a Detailed Plan) []ROCK PIT DEVELOPMENT Indicate Pit Locations on Show timber harvest volumes and acreage in question 20. Map. 12va-D5 wi- SLnv TN[: P,�r7ya L-ii LOTS w.>,�/f-i 7Nr: Ste, i✓ui t2 i V. TIMBER HARVEST SECTION 20. Do YES [ ] NO - WILL YOU BE HARVESTING TIMBER AS A PART OF THIS PROPOSAL? (If YES, complete all blocks that apply and show on map.) (If you will not be harvesting timber as a part of this proposal, go to Section VI.) - - UNIT TYPE OF HARVEST TREES PER METHOD OF ACRES PERCENT OF ESTIMATED 0 •(Even-aged,Uneven-aged ACRE HARVEST VOLUME TO VOLUME TO BE Salvage and/or REMAINING (per BE CUT HARVESTED Right of Way) AFTER (Ground Cable,Highlead, type of HARVEST Skyline,Shovel, Rubber Tired harvest) (in MBF) , (For Harvest Type Information Skidder,Tracked Skidder, see'Even-aged Harvest" (Only count Animal, Helicopter or Balloon.) under trees that meet WAC 222-16-010) the requirements Show the location of each under Even-aged harvest type on Map. harvest in WAC • 222-16-010) 419c/6V6 ACED 20/+cfzt-3 Kv, 3gi 711gED 56Act4.7 I0V '0 eittot478C pi/4-7' sk/on6 tZ . • .as' riR • * For even-aged harvests, provide surrounding-stand information on the base map as required under WAC 222-30-025. See instructions. 21. [ ] YES- p(] NO - WILL YOU BE HARVESTING TIMBER OR LEAVING TREES WITHIN TWO TREE LENGTHS OF ANY OVERHEAD POWER LINES? (If yes, the applicant needs to notify the appropriate Power Company.) 22. INDICATE HOW THE FOLLOWING WILDLIFE TREES WILL BE LEFT: (Check all that apply) * See WAC 222-30-020 (11) for Wildlife Reserve Tree, Green Recruitment Tree and Down Log leave requirements. WILDLIFE RESERVE TREES Imo; GREEN RECRUITMENT TREES ( ] YES [ ] NO - CLUMPED (Show on Map) [ ] YES [ ] NO - CLUMPED (Show on Map) • [ ] YES [ ] NO - EVENLY DISTRIBUTED (Throughout Unit) [ ] YES [ ] NO - EVENLY DISTRIBUTED (Throughout Unit) NOTE: WAC 222-30-020(11) requires that 2 down logs per acre be left in areas where green recruitment trees are required. 23. [] YES NO NO - WILL YOU BE LEAVING A DOUBLE-WIDE RMZ(s) FOR GREEN-UP? (For Western Washington Only) INDICATE DOUBLE-WIDE RMZ LOCATION(s) ON MAP 24. REFORESTATION METHOD: Reforestation is required for lands harvested after January 1, 1975 as shown under WAC 222-34-010 (West of Cascades Summit), or WAC 222-34-020 (East of Cascades Summit). [ ] PLANTING (Species: ) I `[ ] NATURAL (Applicant must submit a Reforestation Plan - See Instructions.) (N REFORESTATION NOT REQUIRED under WAC 222-34-010, 222-34-020 or 222-34-050. • 1\ 3 FORM DNR QQ-19(1-95) VI. HEMICAL APPLICATION OCTION ,•25. 1 I YES bQ NO - THIS FOREST PRACTICE INVOLVES THE'APPL"ICATION OF PESTICIDES OR FERTILIZER? • If YES, answer the questions below.) (If no, go to Section VII.) [ I FERTILIZER APPLICATION - ACRES ( ) - For fertilizer applications answer question 28 and show application locations on the.Base Map.. [ ] PESTICIDE TREATMENT - ACRES ( ) - For pesticide applications answer questions 26 27 and 28, and indicate areas to be treated on the Base Map. Describe in the "General Description Section", the purpose of the pesticide treatment(s) you are proposing. 26. LIST THE EPA REGISTRATION NUMBERS, TRADE NAMES, AND RATES OF APPLICATION FOR ALL CHEMICALS ' PROPOSED, INCLUDING ALL ADJUVANTS. . EPA REG. No. Trade Name of Chemical - Application Unit of Measure 4 • Rate of Active Ingredient • Per Acre l • 27. [] YES ri NO - WILL THIS PESTICIDE BE USED UNDER A DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENTAL USE PERMIT? If yes, include a copy of the Experimental Use Permit. . • 28. CHEMICAL INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON PHONE # (___ _I (Additional information may be required for activities relating to the application of pestici es.) VII. GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 29. Provide any details that will give a better understanding of your project. 7p= cL.c>AR/(Yc a/M/7s. jQ t/1✓ .3-6t:.h' /ri::)/z-f 1) /N 7-N 7---/G60 b,'iT/v fJ fl/c/� ;e,c-)r-16 /1I6PL %-e:/,- , AF.TeZZ GGc/ /NG r 612/J'17//"6 /Nt cONTK/NcTog /46 pe,2Gc_cl.) '/7/' UT 7T/G1/ �a�77 wf S/�JG w/oi., /mf vL/"/e-W is f U� 7N t; Z/9 Lv 7 5v/�ST2/V/s/UtJ, • THE FOLLOWING IS PROVIDED FOR.YOUR INFORMATION: RCW 76.09.220 18)provides any aggrieved person the.right to appeal the approval or disapproval of a forest practices application. RCW 43.21C.075 provides any aggrieved person the nght to appeal issues arising under the State Environmental Policy Act. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the approval or disapproval of the forest practices application. Appeals must be filed with the FOREST PRACTICES APPEALS BOARD,PO BOX 40903,4224-6th Ave SE Bldg/2,Lacey,WA 98504-0903. Appeals must be filed in writing on the form required in Title 223-08. Concurrently with filing of the Forest Practices Appeals Board,copies of the appeals must also be filed with the OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR, DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 1111 Washington St SE,4th Floor Natural resources Bldg.,PO BOX 47001,Olympia, WA 98504-7001,and with the ATTORNEY GENERAL,PO BOX 40100,OLYMPIA,WA 98504-0100. with the Endangered Species Act, or other federal, state, Compliance with this application/ notification does not ensure compliance9 or local laws. SIGNATURE BLOCKS • We affirm that the information contained herein is true, and understand that this proposed Forest Practice is subject to the current rules and regulations of the forest practices act, as well as any applicable Federal, State or Local rules and regulations. LANDOWNER TIMBER OWNER OPERATOR l ., Signature: Signature: ;/ . Signature: '1 /4 fra14 7 • Print: Print: _ Print:/r // ani 7 ./6iC L... 'a/✓ f/d6A-1 LT gcp, //l/Gre/L'S Date of Landowner Signature: Date of Timber.Owner Signature: Date of Operator Signature: rl/ay /2 ZoDl 0"7/Qf Wiz, ZpOO rr/0r /Z zooa cnapa MJA nn-1 V 11.961 1111/ • .. . 2 4 0 7 1 4 3 FCEST PACT CE EASE VAR TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH , RANGE 05 EAST ( W . M . ) , SECTION 14 APPLICATION # • • • • . . I' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II . . . 1 - _. _ ' • - - _ Wetland Price Azto Bil : 1:::i• MN MN . 428418 1 i; I ( -264i9 , 428420 - • --::‘..*.". I q .-- -.I , ' , ...../\ • • I l''''.'M . % 1 1 ; ,. r i ak -4-,L-" • r .„4..1. 1: . i .,..k, .•-•\ ---, ': -.. --.• s........9.,,,o 1 ..... .; .,.....-,. '/...• . , . -.-_,;" I r- • — . i I t. .1 At/v4 1s "::.. •• r- :, ---- 1 ,.!...... l' ,: ......=,,, .... i; • in ,, (:.•-:1,- 1:1 fe....... rter /:• . ".= I ,e" ..s— t, . 53 . . rim , •• _ 7258%::-. -—-----"I r" 427259 . 1427260 . .,.. •- :: --.........---• I . I 1 \ \ lik 1 \ $,, " • • • • \ ail --J Etil2Q98 . , 426099 '426i00 . . \ , . . . N • z --. --- ,1/4, . . . . . . . . \ I V' . 3N -----= SCALE 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 , 6000 iiii, IIIII 11111 IfIltU1111111II[E1 1111111111IIIIIILIII i , I FEET 1 Mile (529)IQ MAP DATE May 09, 2000 C ONTOUR INTERVAL : 40 Feet NAB 27 LEGEND : See• Instructions DISCLAIMER : See Legend Water/Wetlands including their location and class may be incorrectly displayed or not shown on the Base Map. Applicants are responsible for verification and correction of all streams, wetlands, and possible water courses. 'VA — S • FPA/N# ADDENDUM TO FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION (FPA/N) FOR THE PERMANENT MARBLED MURRELET RULE (Effective August 22, 1997) INSTRUCTIONS: To determine if the marbled murrelet rule applies to your proposed forest practice. answer the following questions in order. Only continue through the questions until an answer says "STOP". If the answer is "standard FP rules apply then you are most likely not affected by the marbled murrelet rule. However, DNR resource screening may indicate that "occupied marbled murrelet sites" are present. If so. you will be contacted for further information. If the answer is "Class IV-Special". then call DNR Forest Practices at ( ) to find out how to proceed. There may be other rules which could make your forest practice a Class IV- Special. This addendum only addresses marbled murrelets. 1. Is the proposal within 50 miles of saltwater? (If unsure, Call DNR) [ ] YES - go to question #2. ['NO - STOP, standard FP rules apply. unless there is an occupied marbled murrelet site. 2. Does the landowner own less than 500 acres of forest land within 50 miles of salt water?.(See WAC 222-16-080 (1)(i)(vi)(A)) ['AYES - STOP, standard FP rules apply, unless there is an occupied Marbled Murrlet site. [ ] NO - go to question#3. 3. Is the proposal covered by an approved endangered species plan (HCP, CHEA, LOP, etc.)? [ ] YES - STOP, Follow plan and standard FP rules apply. [ ] NO - STOP,go to question#4. 4. Has a marbled murrelet protocol survey been completed? [ ] YES - If this is an "occupied marbled murrelet site" (Status 1-3 detection), STOP Class IV-Special. - If murrelets found with a Status 4 detection, go to question #5. - If no status 1-4 detections, STOP. attach survey information and standard rules apply. - NOTE: Report any new detections to WDFW. [ ] NO - go to question#5. • • • FPA NUMBER: FOREST AND FISH EMERGENCY RULE ADDENDUM *NOTE: A companion worksheet to this addendum form is available from the region office to assist applicants with completing their forest practices application. **This addendum and all applicable worksheets must be included with the forest practices application.** PLEASE ANSWER EACH QUESTION BELOW 1. Does the landowner claim the 20 acre small landowner parcel riparian rule exemption? (See WAC 222-20-023) (Landowner must own less than 80 acres of forest land in the state) ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet#1. ji3 No - Does Not Apply. 2A. Will there be any activity within 300 - 345 feet of Type 1-3 water (bankfull width or channel migration zone)? ❑ Yes - Within 300 feet in Western Washington or; Complete Worksheet#2A West. ❑ Yes- Within 345 feet in Eastern Washington- Complete Worksheet#2A East. No.-Does Not Apply. 2B. Will there be any activity within 50 feet of Type 4 water (stream, spring, seeps, etc.)? ❑ Yes - Within 50 feet in Western Washington or; Complete Worksheet#2B West. ❑ Yes - Within 50 feeet in Eastern Washington - Complete Worksheet#2B East. fla No -Does Not Apply. 2C. Will there be any pesticide application within 200 feet of residences, agricultural land, surface waters, or their associated buffers? • ❑ Yes- Complete Worksheet#2C. . 3 No -Does Not Apply. 3. Do you want to apply for the small landowner easement program? ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet#3. No -Does Not Apply. 4. Is the area within the application subject to a Habitat Conservation Plan(HCP)? ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet#4. No -Does Not Apply. REVISED MAY 1,2000 *OVER* • 5. Is the applicant claiming a timber excise tax credit? ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet#5. NI. No 6. Are you requesting a Multi-Year permit? (Based only on an approved Watershed Analysis or Road Maintenance & Abandonment Plan) ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet #6. No -Does Not Apply. 7. Will there be any activity within 50 feet of potentially unstable slopes/or landforms? ❑ Yes - Complete Worksheet#7. 14 No -Does Not Apply. 8. Are there any wetlands (Forest Practices Rule definition) on or adjacent to this proposal? J�1 Yes - Complete Worksheet#8. ❑ No -Does Not Apply. 9. In order to determine which road maintenance and abandonment plan the landowner must comply with, does the landowner own less than 500 acres of forest land within the DNR Region where this application applies? 53 Yes - Complete Worksheet#9A. ❑ No - Complete Worksheet#9B: • • • • • • REVISED MAY 1,2000 05/1C '00 15:26 ID REGION ENVMCLAW WA FAX: PAGE 2 FPA NUMBER WORKSHEET#8 WETLANDS PLEASE AANSWERUACHQUESTION BELOW ii 7 i()ICIlai✓ f r✓5 . Does the proposal involve the filling or draining of more than a total of 0.1 (one tenth)of an acre of forested wetlands, Type A, or B wetlands? YES - Wetland mitigation plan is required under WAC 222-16-035 and the wetlands must be delineated,mapped, and mitigation measures described in Item 29 of the forest practice application/notification. Mitigation will follow the guidance provided in the Forest Practices Board Manual, Section 9. NO-Does Not Apply 2. Will there be any activity within a riparian management zone that contains forested wetlands (see WAC 222-16-036)7 YES - The approximate determination of all of the wetland(s) boundary must be mapped, including those parts of forested wetlands that lie within the harvest unit but outside the RMZ. WI NO - Does Not Apply 3. Does the land covered by this application/notification contain any forested wetlands 3 acres or more in size (see WAC 222-16-036)7 ,o 7 7A CrUG J u. 7'-' Z:2 vIcj 4-4jti7I f j Yes - All forested wetlands 3 acres or more in size must have their approximate boundaries determined and mapped as part of a complete application. Refer to section 8 of the Forest Practices Board Manual for further information on wetland delineation. LI NO - Does Not Apply **See WAC 222-30-020 Harvest unit planning and design, for further guidance. REVISED MAY 1,2000 ' • • • • FPA NUMBER WORKSHEET #9A ROAD MAINTENANCE AND ABANDONMENT PLAN FOR . LANDOWNER WITH LESS THAN 500 ACRES OF FOREST LAND 'I LOCATED WITHIN A REGION BOUNDARY • PLEASE ANSWER EACH QUESTION BELOW • 1. Do you have an approved road maintenance and abandonment plan for your entire ownership? ❑ Yes - Road Plan# $J No - Go to question#2. 2. Complete and attach plan and provide the following information. 56.L G•[ V L L %N t g v /`'tro/r/i cN/°r..GL *Miles of forest roads in planning area *Miles of abandonment proposed . *Number of fish blockages 3. List all ownership acres (by parcel) in the state. Township Range Parcel Number Acres • REVISED MAY 1,2000 S .• • -- 240 71 43 ❑ Level Two Road Maintenance Plan Timber harvest, roads, quarries, pits, or waste areas within 50' of Type 4 or 5 water, or there is a mass wasting/sediment delivery potential from roads into any typed waters. ❑ 1. Ownership map showing road system ❑ 2. Road status(active or abandoned) ❑ 3. Maintenance schedule and priorities for current year and every year after O a. Culverts and ditches adequately designed and maintained ❑ b. Cuts and fills stabilized and revegetated • ❑ c. Roads graded, crowned or outsloped and maintained ❑ d. All Type 4 & 5 water crossing approaches will be surfaced with adequate depth of non-erodible material for a minimum of 50 feet on each side of water crossing ❑ e. Pull back potentially unstable sidecast material ❑ f. Adequate numbers and proper placement of live stream culverts, cross-drain culverts, or waterbar dips ❑ g. Place culverts in natural drainage areas ❑ h. Avoid head-wall and inner gorge construction ❑ i. Abandon or deactivate high risk roads in unstable areas and RMZs 0 4. Plan for future maintenance and repair of extensive storm damage O a. Drainage structures will be in place and functional at conclusion of harvest Level Three Road Maintenance Plan Timber harvest, roads, quarries,pits, or waste areas on relatively flat ground with no potential to deliver sediment to any typed water. ' O 1. Ownership ma._howing road system • • la 2. Road status 4531P.r abandoned) O 3. Maintenance sc edule and priorities for current year ❑ a. Ditch cleanout ❑ b. Roads graded, crowned or outsloped,and maintained 0 4. Plan for future maintenance and repair of extensive storm damage ❑ a. Drainage structures will be in place and functional at conclusion of harvest COMMENTS: TkE 7ZaoDS C,c7t r i ✓C7(, f//l/r/c r G7z/oPavC L -v4.N7(/I aN lic)/r/ s TO / v7R/NpC4- P//G -r/N/7/oR Y fG wL,l�J /-1/ 3 w�13/GI/77L;2 5 1^-'7 e-K.r ,r-)) 227a✓/(v6 Tic- Gv/« fA VC- 7 vt iTl 'O.ft 1-,ar I 0,-/7/.J//J 1 ti/5 J FD/it /O/"i C- V t-P/6I7 e-P 72 7N C C/7 Y o r fe/c,d 7 O F vv/O 1'. This plan represents my entire ownership in this Region. I understand that the information contained herein is true and that this proposal is subject to current rules and regulations of the forest practices act, as well as any applicable Federal, State,or Local rules and regulations. Landowner or Design Representative Signature Date REVISED MAY 1,2000 • ' 05/18/00 PAGE 1 FOREST PRACTICES TRAX SYSTEM REPORT PRE-CLASS ID = 28840 SEC TWN RGE CONTROL TP NAME DESCRIPTION MAP LOCATION WATER TRIBUTARY NUMBER CD SOURCE 15 230 050 E S1 *2175701C S1*21757C DM FS 17 NW4 SW4 SW4 UNN STR CEDAR R 15 230 050 E 05 C00005 RENTON CITY LIMITS, CITY OF RENTON 17 10 230 050 E 05 C00005 RENTON CITY LIMITS, CITY OF RENTON 17 1110 S • . Forest Practices RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCESS II FPA 4 I_ Is the propont proposing an alternate plan? 1 Z. Is the_proptrait requesting written permission for deviation from a specific rule 2 rule for whith the DNR has discretion? 1 Has an aff Indian Tribe expressed inter st in the area of the proposed 3 activity due to arhaeologic or cultural issues? i 4- Has the Re6on i ratified issues of concern on previous applications with 4 like circu mstnces? 5_ Are there Waters:-.ed Analysis prescriptions(draft. interim_ or final)in place for this WAU? (If yes, Risk AscPcsment does not apply for those Environmental Factors marked with a *.) s 6_ Is there a Habits Conservation Plan(HCP)or any other formal agreement that requires a 30- i day review pc-ice..?Please list the name of any other formal agreement in the Remarks section 6 • below. FOREST PRACTICES ACTIVITIES E-tiro ntal Factors I Roads Harvest Aerial Anp. 0 Cnn,tr Ahann^-+ Pzct ;t-�-, 1 . Tvoe l-3 Neat. o n RLMZ* / 16 36 56 81 Type 4-5 Water w,'3 25'*Water or 17 37 57 82 Water intake%Li _5 .downstream 1 18 38 58 83 Tvve A-B wrtt.,-,-ts ar WMZ 19 39 59 84 Operations in a`ore ' wetland 20 40 ic_ 60 85 Very unstable i 1v erodible soils* 1 21 41 61 Slooes>40%: oun:3ased systems* / 22 42 62 Rain on Snow Zone- I - 63 Difficult Rece�aric Area I 64 High use area°aomes within 1/4 mi. I 65 86 Sensitive spec es 1 23 43 66 87 303d* I 24 44 67 88 c e ceT(Ctit;,-.1 r.- ..occp.fi cre.-t-cl* I 1: _j: 6R co REN ARKS SECTION A-Based on f Sher review.the following cells are not applicable- • B-Further review inncates that the baseline rules will adequately protect public resources for the following cells- C- Comments- • NOTE:Extended .^ rats should be placed on an attachment. • Siffiature Date (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK) Revised:April 16.1996 4254544% THE BURNSTEADS 011 184 P02 SEP 07 '99 08:29 ty CITY OF RENTON 1.4 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,May r Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator 6 September 2, 1999 2407143 Mr. Ron Hughes, P.E. Burnstead Constructicin Company 1215—120th Avenue 14E, #201 Bellevue,WA 98005 ak SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-99-069,PP,ECF • Dear Mr. Hughes: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on August 31, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Seethe enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be-tiled in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,Washington, on September 28, 1999, at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat and Variance. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-7219 For the Environmenta' Review Committee, 6);*.k. 4t- Peter Rosen • Project Manager I cc: Parties of Record: C. Donnelly, R. Noreen, T. LeMay, H. Reynolds, D. Stanley, R. Pinkley, J. Tarantola, S. Nipert, E. Duff, S. Day Enclosure • • • dttsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This popor contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 425454, THE BURNSTEADS 184 P03 SEP 07 '99 08:29 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION C')F PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part -8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundry of the site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132 Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate t 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128t Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148`h Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. MITIGATION ME'.ASURES: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be Installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Developrtent Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status ar d condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted:by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shal be required prior to final plat approv8I. 2. The stormws ter release rate for the developed;site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm a vent through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume_ The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned ;stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3, The applican'shall work with Water District#90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire t ydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to :terve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The applicant's share of the signal cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148`h owe. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. The applicant may set up a latecomer's aigreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip A*1 associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. E 4-4 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 425454 THE BURNSTERDS 184 PO4 SEP 07 '99 08:30 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Bumstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132 Street provide east/west internal access. Then; are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires twc variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4"Street(SE 128"Street)on.,the north, SE 136"Street on the south, between 148`r Avenue SE and 152'i Avenue SE. Advisory Noi es to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes'are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Observe recommendations of the geotechnical deport. FIRE 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet, the • minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300 feet are required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500 feet and will require that Lots 33 tr rough 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted en the civil water plans and they require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per City street ordinance. 4. Main entr' roadway, SE 132"d Street off of 148" Avenue SE shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-foot width each, not the 16 feet proposed. PLAN REVIEW SEWER 1. The development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148"Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE)from SE 128" St. (NE 4"St.) to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4"St. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. 425454 THE BURNSTEADS 184 P05 SEP 07 '99 08:30 Maplewood Eetates Preliminary Plat LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF 2 4 0 7 1 4 3 Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 2. System Development Charges of $585 per single family house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. 3. A special assessment for the East Renton Interceptor shall be required and a latecomer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. WATER 1. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90 for this project. Plans for the water sys tem per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Renton Fire Department Standards/Codes. DRAINAGE 1. A concepl.ual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The proposed developm ant is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the downstream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements are required for the project as a SEPA mitigation measure. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control ohms shall be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSW DMA) as adopted by the City of Renton.... 2. System Development Charges of$385..,per building lot will be;required at the time of construction permit iss • uance. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The project will require full street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving, street dra nage, street lights and undergrounding,of overhead utility lines. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet, with a minimum of 32-feefiwide.pavement within the plat required. GENERAL All required uiility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to city of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and i ispection of these improvements Is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Helf of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. POLICE Once developed, there would be approximately 161.32 calls for service (CFS) annually to this development. PARKS 2. Recommend trail connection through site to proposed County Regional Trail system through County-owned Colasurdo property designated for future park development by City of Renton and annexed into the City. May want to consider a notification on the face of the plat that adjacent park property is potentially programmed for active park development, 3. A bicycle lane has been identified on NE 4th Street in the City's Trails and Master Plan. Street improvements should include a 5-foot wide bike lane. RAULIC PROJECT APPRAL State of Washington r 4' �/ RCW 75.20.100 or RCW 75.20.108 Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 4 Office �� 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard ' WILDLIFE Mill Creek,Washington 98012 DATE OF ISSUE: April 14.2000 LOG NUMBER: 00-E4468-01 PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Burnstead Construction Core Design,Inc. ATTENTION: Ron Hughes Al 1bNTION: Edgar T. Jones 1215 - 120th Avenue Northeast,#201 4205 - 148th Avenue Northeast,#200 Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425-454-1900 425-885-7877 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Culverts and Wetland Mitigation and Discharge Stormwater PROJECT LOCATION: 13200 - 148th Avenue Southeast, Renton, Washington # WRIA WATER BODY TRIBUTARY TO 1/4 SEC. SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE COUNTY 1 08.0299 Unnamed Creek Cedar River NW 14 23 North 05 East King NOTE:These culverts are proposed for locations where fish passage is not a concern. PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin immediately and shall be completed by July 1,2001,provided that construction within the ordinary high water line(OHWL) shall occur only between June 16 and October 15. 2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications entitled,"PLAT OF MAPLEWOOD ESTATES", dated March 1,2000; "MITIGATION PLANTING SCHEDULE WETLAND MITIGATION AREA 1 MAPLEWOOD" dated April 2000; "MITIGATION PLANTING SCHEDULE WETLAND MITIGATION AREA 2 MAPLEWOOD", dated April 2000; "CONSTRUCTION NOTES MAPLEWOOD",dated March 2000; and"STORM DRAINAGE REPORT FOR MAPLEWOOD PARCEL", dated February 2000,and submitted to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. These plans reflect design criteria per Chapter 220-110 WAC. These plans reflect mitigation procedures to significantly reduce or eliminate impacts to fish resources. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 3. The points of the stormwater discharge shall be armored to prevent scouring. 4. Excavation for the placement of the structures or armoring materials shall be isolated from the wetted perimeter. 5. The culvert widths at each streambed shall be equal to or greater than the average widths of the streambeds. 6. The culverts shall be installed to maintain structural integrity to the 100-year peak flow with consideration of the debris likely to be encountered. 7. Fill associated with the culvert installations shall be protected from erosion to the 100-year peak flow. 8. The culverts shall be installed and maintained to avoid inlet scouring and to prevent erosion of downstream stream banks and/or associated wetlands. Page 1 of 4 IlkYDRAULIC PROJECT APPR VAL State of Washington r 1111' '� RCW 75.20.100 or RCW 75.20.108 Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 4 Office � 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard WILDLIFE Mill Creek,Washington 98012 PATE OF ISSUE: April 14. 2000 LOG NUMBER: 00-E4468-01 APPLICATION ACCEPTED: March 20, 2000 ENFORCEMENT OFFICER: Peck 024 [P3] Larry Fisher (425) 649-7042 ��a,� ._ for Director Area Habitat Biologist WDF' GENERAL PROVISIONS This Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA)pertains only to the provisions of the Fisheries Code(RCW 75.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. This HPA shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the permittee and operator(s)performing the work. This HPA does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this HPA is issued may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat which results from failure to comply with the provisions of this HPA. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day or a gross misdemeanor charge,possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All HPAs issued pursuant to RCW 75.20.100 or 75.20.160 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The permittee has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All HPAs issued pursuant to RCW 75.20.103 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the permittee: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 75.20.130. APPEALS-GENERAL INFORMATION IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL A DENIAL OF OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 75.20.100, 75.20.103,75.20.106,AND 75.20.160: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A) The denial or issuance of a HPA,or the conditions or provisions made part of a HPA; or (B) An order imposing civil penalties. It is recommended that an aggrieved party contact the Area Habitat Biologist and discuss the concerns. Most problems are resolved at this level,but if not,you may elevate your concerns to his/her supervisor. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30-days of the denial or issuance of a HPA or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. The 30-day time requirement may be stayed by the Department if negotiations are occurring between the aggrieved party and the Area Habitat Biologist and/or his/her supervisor. The Habitat Protection Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or its designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal, a formal appeal may be filed. Page 3 of 4 110 Environmental Checklist 2 4 0 71 4 3 A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Maplewood 2. Name of applicant: Burnstead Construction Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Ron Hughes, P.E. ( Burnstead Construction Company) 1215 120th Avenue N.E., Suite#201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 454-1900 ext 233 4. Date checklist prepared: April 23, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will begin as soon as the required permits & approvals are issued. It is estimated that this could occur during the summer of 2000. Plat improvements would be completed in the Fall of 2000. Construction of single family homes would begin late in 2000, with toal build out complete within approximately five years. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Burnstead Construction Co. owns a 10 acre parcel on the eastside which is in King County. This parcel will be provided access with the extension of S.E. 135th Street within the plat of Maplewood. This parcel will be developed once home sales within Maplewood are well along. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Storm Drainage Study prepared by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. Wildlife & Habitat Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. Traffic Report prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. Geotechnical Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 1 Environmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Thershold Determination City of Renton Preliminary and Final Plat City of Renton Clearing and Grading Permits City of Renton Roadway & Storm Drainage Plan Approval City of Renton Sewer Extension Approval City of Renton Water Extension Approval Water District 90 Forest Practice Application Dept. of Natural Resources NPDES Permit Dept. of Ecology Building Permits City of Renton 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to subdivide the 62.7 acre site into 218 single-family residential lots with related streets, sidewalks, storm drainage, sewer and water utilities.The portion of the site north of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-5, and will have 74 lots which will be 7,200 square feet minimum in area. The remainder of the site is zoned R-8, and will consist of 144 lots with a mimimum lot area of 4,500 square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on the eastside of Renton in the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 N., Range 5 E., W.M. in King County, Washington. The site is between 148th Avenue S.E. and 152nd Avenue S.E. and is bordered on the south by S.E. 136th Street, if extended, and on the north by S.E. 128th Street. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth A. General description of the site (circle one) flat, oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is relatively flat with slopes in the range of 2% - 8%. The site slopes in a southwesterly direction and there are some small areas where slopes exceed 10%. 2 ilb Environmental Checklist C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Per the Soils Conservation Service Soil Survey, soils on the site consist of the Alderwood series, gravelly sandy loam. For more detailed information, refer to the Geotechnical Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. E. Describe the purpose,type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will occur for street, utility construction and on the lots to create building pads. Stripping the site will generate approximately 75,500 cubic yards of unsuitable material. The current preliminary grading plan creates 37,000 cubic yards of cut and 137,600 cubic yards of fill. By dropping the site one foot, the cut/fill quanities would be within 30, 000 cubic yards of balancing. Gravel backfill will be imported to the site for utility and street construction. The probable source is Renton Sand &Gravel. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so generally describe. Erosion of exposed soils could occur when vegetation is cleared during construction operations. A Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan will be prepared and approved by the City prior to construction activity on site. G. About what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Streets, sidewalks, houses and driveways will cover approximately 40% of the site. H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented during the construction period after City approval. The plan would include filter fabric fences, temporary construction entrance and sediment ponds. 2. AIR A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, heavy equipment, delivery and worker's vehicles would generate exhaust emissions. Construction activity could also produce dust from exposed soils. 3 Environmental Checklist B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water trucks will be used as necessary to control dust during plat construction. 3. WATER A. Surface Water: 1 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type, location and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Wetland conditions are present in six locations on the property. An intermittent stream with associated wetlands crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. A smaller intermittent stream is associated with two other wetland areas. All wetlands are Class 2 because of their forested vegetation. The site also contains three unregulated wetland due to their size and isolated condition. The boundaries of these wetlands have been field located and are plotted on the preliminary plat map. Please refer to the Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. for additional details. Stormwater runoff from the site flows to the Cedar River which is approximately one mile downstream. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. It is proposed to cross the wetlands at five locations as shown on the attached Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by Terra Associates. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Construction of the roadway crossings of the wetlands will require approximately 5,800 cubic yards of fill material. During site grading, the suitable material will be used for roadway fills. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None. 4 S Environmental Checklist 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. B. Ground Water: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The streets, houses, driveways and other impervious surfaces associated with the proposed development would increase both the rate and amount of strom water leaving the site. Storm water runoff will be collected in a series of catch basins and conveyed in underground pipes to an on-site detention pond.The required detention volume is 160,089 cubic feet and the allowable release rate is 2.18 cubic feet per second, (the existing 2-year peak rate). Controlled discharge from the pond will eventually discharge to the Cedar River approximately 1 mile downstream. 2. Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials are unlikely to enter ground or surface waters. Urban runoff, which contains small amounts of pollutants from motor vehicles & landscaping activities, will enter the storm drainage system. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. The proposed drainage control system and water quality facilities will be designed and implemented in accordance with the City of Renton standards. These standards have been developed to minimize potential surface, ground, water quality and runoff impacts. 5 Environmental Checklist 4. PLANTS A. Check or circle types of vegetation f•_und on the site: x deciduous tree: .Ider.,maple aspen, other cottonwood x evergreen tree: ir'edar pine, other hemlock shrubs x grass x pasture crop or grain x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other 111 x other types of vegetation (Please list) See attached Table 1 from Terra Associates B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The proposal would result in the removal of a large portion of the forested vegetation of the site with the construction of streets and homes. With the exception of roadway crossings, the wetlands will be left undisturbed and a 50 foot buffer will be provided for additional protection. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist. D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be landscaped with deciduous trees and evergreen trees. A wetland mitigation plan will be prepared to create 36,119 sq. ft. of wetlands. 5. ANIMALS A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: See attached Ta 2 from Terra Associates. Birds: hawk heron, eagle, ongbirds other: Blackbirds,grouse, woodpecker Mammals: deer, sear, elk, beaver, other: Coyote, rodents raccoon Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: B. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. 6 Environmental Checklist D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The majority of the existing wetlands will remain undistrubed and a 50 foot buffer provided for additional protection. Appproximately 36,119 sq. ft. of wetlands will be created. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be the primary source of energy for lighting and natural gas will be the source for heating and cooking in the homes. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The residences will meet energy conservation measures. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None. B. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along S.E. 128th Street, a principal arterial, creates some noise at the north end of the site. I Environmental Checklist 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During working hours, construction activities would increase the peak on-site noise levels to approximately 80-90 dBA. The completed and occupied project would result in a slightly higher ambient noise level than the undeveloped site, as is typical from the traffic, people and pets in residential neighborhoods. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activities would be limited to the period from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays for the activities that produce the highest noise levels such as heavy equipment operations. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is vacant and undeveloped. The adjacent property to the south is undeveloped, but is in the planning stages by King County to be developed as a park. The surrounding property on the west, north and east are single family homes. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. None. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The portion of the site north of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-5. The portion of the site south of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-8. F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The site is designated as Residential Rural to the north of S.E. 132nd Street and Residential Single Family to the south. G. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. 8 111 Environmental Checklist H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. There are five Class 2 wetlands and three unregulated wetlands on the site. Also, associated with the wetlands are two intermittent streams. Refer to the Revised Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. for additional details. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Assuming an average of 2.5 people per household, 545 people are expected to reside in the development. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal is a single-family residential development which conforms to the City of Renton Land Use Plan and policies for the area. 9. HOUSING A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The project will create 218 single-family homes for the middle-income market. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. AESTHETICS A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is he principal exterior building material(s) proposed? House plans will conform to zoning requirements which limit heights to 30 feet. Exterior building materials would include brick, wood siding, shingles and glass. 9 111 • Environmental Checklist B. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views would be obstructed. However, the new homes will be visible from residences adjacent to the site on the north and east. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. New streets and homesites would be landscaped to include trees, shrubs, groundcover and lawns. Approximately 3.3 acres of wetlands will remain with buffer areas. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day or night would it mainly occur? Light will be produced by new homes, streetlights and motor vehicles on-site, generally in the evening hours and during winter months in the early morning hours. Motor vehicle headlights may produce some glare. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare is not expected to be a problem. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None. 12. RECREATION A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Park, Coalfield Park and Maplewood Heights Park are all located within two miles of the site. B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The plat will provide an on-site park for the use of the homwowners within the subdivision. 10 Environmental Checklist 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. TRANSPORTATION A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will have access from S.E.128th Street with the extension of 148th Avenue S.E. The internal roadway system will provide a through connection for S.E. 132nd Street from east to west. B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop. Route#111 runs along S.E. 128th Street. There is a Park and Ride lot located at the intersection of S.E. 128th Street and 164th Avenue S.E. The closest bus stop is located at 148th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 128th Street intersection. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Each house would have a minimum of two garage spaces and two driveway spaces for a total of 872 parking spaces. No parking would be eliminated. D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, public streets will be constructed within the site to access the single family lots. Street improvements will be required along 148th Avenue SE to provide access to the site from SE 128th Street. SE 132nd, which currently dead ends at the site on the west and east, will be extended through the site within a 60 foot right of way. E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. 11 • Environmental Checklist F. How many weekday vehicular trips (one way) per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project will generate 2,123 trips per day. The peak volumes would occur from 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None are proposed as part of the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. New residences would contribute to an incremental need for fire, police, school, health care and city public works services. B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Taxes and fees paid by the project developer and future residences pay for or substantially offset the cost of services to neighborhoods. No additional measures are proposed. 16. UTILITIES A. Cir utilitie rrently available at the site: •lectricity btu s;�water refuse ervice, lephone, anitary sewer, septic system, • e .Cable TV B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: City of Renton Water: Water District 90 Electricity & Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: U S West Cable TV: TCI Cable C. SIGNATURE I, Ronald F. Hughes, P.E., the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: i?� Name Printed: g,, AL17 . h/UcIJE5 Date: ApRiL 3 J09(7 12 I TABLE 1 PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD • Renton,Washington ii Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- . Vegetated TREES Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple FACU X Alnus rubra Red alder FAC X X X Arbutus menziesii Madrone UPL X Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood FAC X X . Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry FACU X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir FACU X X Pyrus malus Apple X X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X Thuja plicata Western red cedar FAC X X X • Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock FACU X SHRUBS Acer circinatum Vine maple FAC X X X Corylus cornuta Hazelnut FACU X X Crataegus douglasii Black hawthorn FAC X X Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom UPL X X Gaultheria shallon Salal FACU X Holodiscus discolor Ocean-spray UPL X Ilex aquifolium English holly UPL X X Mahonia nervosa Cascade Oregon grape UPL X Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum UPL X X X Oplopanax horridum Devil's club FAC X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X X Ribes lacustre Prickly currant FAC X X Rosa gymnocarpa Baldhip rose FACU X • Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry FACU X X X Rubus laciniatus Evergreen blackberry FACU X Rubus leucodermis Blackcap UPL X Rubus parvijlorus Thimbleberry FAC X Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry FAC X X X Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry FACU X X X Salix sp. Willow X Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry FACU X Project No. T-2798 I TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE ' • Maplewood Renton,Washington . Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated SHRUBS (Continued) Sorbus aucuparia European mountain ash UPL X • Spiraea douglasii Hardhack spirea FACW X X Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry NI X X Vaccinium parvifolium Red huckleberry UPL X X HERBS Agrostis alba Redtop FAC Agrostis tenuis Colonial bentrass FACU X Athyrium filix femina Lady-fern FAC X X Blechnum spicant Deer-fern FAC X Carex canescens Gray sedge FACW X Carex obnupta Slough sedge OBL X ' 1 Carex sp. Sedge X _ Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle - FACU X Crepis capillaris Smooth hawksbeard FACU X Dactylis glomerata Orchardgrass FACW X Dicentra formosa Bleeding heart FACU X X • Digitalis purpurea Foxglove FACU X Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed FACU X Equisetum arvense Field horsetail FAC X X Equisetum telmatiea Giant horsetail FACW X Galium aparine Cleavers FACU X • Galium triflorum Bedstraw FACW X Geranium robertianum Robert geranium UPL X X Geum macrophyllum Large-leaved avens FACW X X Graminae spp. Grasses X X • Luzu/a parviflora Small-flowered wood- FAC X rush ' Lysichitum americanum Skunk cabbage OBL X . Maianthemum dilatatum False lily-of-the-valley FAC X X Montia sibirica Western springbeauty FAC X , Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW X Plantago lanceolata English plantain FAC X X Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass FAC X X Polypodium glycyrrhiza Licorice-fern UPL X Polystichum munitum Sword-fern FACU X X X Pteridium aquilinum Bracken-fern FACU X X Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup FACW X X i Solanum dulcamara European bittersweet FAC X Stachys cooleyi Cooley's hedge-nettle FACW X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton, Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated HERBS (Continued) Taraxacum officinale Common dandelion FACU X X Tolmiea menziesii Pig-a-back plant FAC X X Trillium ovatum Western trillium FACU X Urtica dioica . Stinging nettle FAC X X Vicia americana American vetch FAC X • Wetland Indicator Status: OBL - Obligate wetland species, occur almost always (estimated> 99%)under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW- Facultative wetland species, usually occur in wetland(estimated 67%to 99%),but occasionally found in non-wetland. FAC - Facultative species,equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands(estimated 34%to 66%). • FACU - Facultative upland species, usually occur in non-wetlands(estimated 67%to 99 %)but occasionally found in wetlands(estimated 1 %to 33 %) UPL - Upland species,occur almost always(estimated> 99%)under natural conditions in non-wetlands. NI - No indicator status assigned. Project No. T-2798 1 TABLE 2 ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton,Washington I I Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- ' Vegetated AMPHIBIANS Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile X X • Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum X X Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa X Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii X W.Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum X 1 Western Toad Bufo boreas X Pacific Chorus Frog Pseudacris regilla X X Red-legged Frog Rana aurora X X REPTILES Northern Alligator Lizard Elgaria coerulea X Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis X X X W.Terrestrial Garter Snake Thamnophis elegans X X Northwestern Garter Snake Thamnophis ordinoides X X • BIRDS Mallard Anas platyrhynchos X Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus X X Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperi X Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis X X • American Kestrel Falco sparverius Merlin Falco columbarius X Ruffed Grouse * Bonasa umbellus X . California Quail Callipepla californica X Killdeer Charadrius vociferus X Glaucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens X Rock Dove Columba Livia X 1 Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata X X Common Barn-owl Tyto alba X Western Screech-owl Otus kennicottii X' X Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus X X 1 Barred Owl Strix varia X Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus X i Common Nighthawk ** Chordeiles minor f Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus X X Red-breasted Sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber X Downy Woodpecker * Picoides pubescens X X Hairy Woodpecker Picoides villosus X • Northern Flicker * Co/aptes auratus X X X Pileated Woodpecker * Dryocopus pileatus X X Western Wood Pewee * Contopus sordidulus X Project No. T-2798 1 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington 1 Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated 1 BIRDS (Continued) Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii X X Hammond's Flycatcher Empidonax hanmrondii X II Violet-green Swallow ** Tachycineta thalassina N.Rough-winged Swallow ** Stelgidopteryx serripennis Barn Swallow ** Hirundo rustica Steller's Jay * Cyanocitta stelleri X X j American Crow * Corvus brachyrhynchos X X X Black-capped Chickadee * Parus atricappilus X X X Bushtit * Psaltriparus minimus X X Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta canadensis X Brown Creeper Certhia americana X Bewick's Wren * Thryomanes bewickii X X X Winter Wren Troglodytes troglodytes X Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus satrapa X Ruby-crowned Kinglet Regulus calendula - X X X - Swainson's Thrush * Catharus ustulatus X X American Robin * Turdus migratorius X X X Varied Thrush Ixoreus naevius X X X Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum X X X 1 European Starling * Sturnus vulgaris X X X 1 i Solitary Vireo Vireo solitaries X Hutton's Vireo Vireo huttoni X • Warbling Vireo Vireo gilvus X Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus X X Orange-crowned Warbler Vermivora celata X X Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia X X Yellow-rumped Warbler Dendroica coronata X X X Black-throated Gray Warbler* Dendroica nigrescens X X McGillivray's Warbler Oporornis tolmiei X X Wilson's Warbler Wilsonia pusilla X X X Western Tanager * Piranga ludoviciana X Black-headed Grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus X X X 1 Rufous-sided Towhee * Pipilo erythrophthalmus X X X Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca X X X I Song Sparrow * Melospiza melodia X X X j Golden-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla X White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys X I Dark-eyed Junco Junco hvemalis X X X Brewer's Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus X 1 Project No. T-2798 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated BIRDS (Continued) Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater X X X Purple Finch Carpodacus purpureus X X House Finch * Carpodacus mexicanus X X Pine Siskin Carduelis pinus X X X American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis X X X Evening Grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus X X House Sparrow * Passer donesticus X MAMMALS Common Opossum Didelphis virginiana X Vagrant Shrew Sorex vagrans Dusky Shrew Sorex obscurus X Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsi X X Townsend's Mole * Scapanus townsendi X X Pacific Mole - Scapanus orarius X X Little Brown Myotis ** ivlyotis lucifugus Yuma Myotis ** Myotis yumaensis Long-eared Myotis ** Myotis evotis Long-legged Myotis ** Myotis volans California Myotis ** Myotis californicus ' Silver-haired Bat ** Lasionycteris noclivagans Big Brown Bat ** Eptesicus fuscus Hoary Bat ** Lasiurus cinereus Eastern Cottontail • Syhdlagus floridanus X Mountain Beaver * Aplodontia rufa X Townsend's Chipmunk Eutamias townsendi X Eastern Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis X Douglas' Squirrel * Tamiasciurus douglasi X Deer Mouse Perontyscus maniculatus X • X Bushy-tailed Woodrat Neotonta cinerea X Townsend's Vole Microtus townsendi Oregon Vole Microtus oregoni X Norway Rat Rattus norvegicus X Black Rat Rattus rattus X House Mouse Mus ntusculus X Pacific Jumping Mouse Zapus trinotatus X Porcupine Erethizon dorsatunt X Raccoon * Procyon lotor X X X Short-tailed Weasel Mustela erminea X Project No. T-2798 • TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated i MAMMALS (Continued) Long-tailed Weasel Mustela frenata X Spotted Skunk Spilogale putorius Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis X X Coyote * Canis latrans X X Red Fox Vulpes vulpes X Bobcat Lynx rufus X X Black-tailed Deer * Odocoileus hemionus X X Notes: * Species observed on-site, including visual observations,vocalizations,and indirect evidence(tracks, scat, burrows,and nests) ** These species forage aerially for insects over a variety of habitats Project No. T-2798 L - a < . J I ,_ 1 �1 - - ._... 152ND AVE. 5.E. l 1 ^\ \ �� I/I I/ --_:_:-1 NU 129 a pi- _ 124 122 117 1 114 =__ t 1k I re, __ , ;___ 01‘... _ _ 73 7 71 7• 3� 55 11110[ I�_ illA 113) _/ F wf 4r ; —�-7 ) Ii e� � i t's.. ,,, I WARIBIEW / _ 1 �� ` \ l �� 10� , 102 I. /*; A�O�\1 III / / 108 I EP � ril !'l � sz � i,:S' •SB ii 1 � im=m �11\ 109II �--J39 I 41 44 I 5Milne �/ / 1� / � ®' � ,,,m_Ast"... 4i** . '''- 10_4) gi Militer_JLEVAtor_r_w_tor'or)11112(111 410. " lit him_I -mix imil & 11111rior- ii-,,",a_p_. 1111111=1 lin 70 �� ti I IIWI % 4 i-\\,, , :,: ,. r_ ___, 0 ON 1-1 M•..aM E;W.WWIL4 11.111 fitik Nit 4 , *43 / Eil 81 11111 - fal 8 ' aril - u 3([)is -29 M 28 20 ' PARK wr„,.. ," vo., - 00 775 'Nvo,... piii ,,,ovv ,,vvvvvv•� ,III i , 1k4g#I. \ -:iE_Liffirr4 wro" Azir4Ii isil NOT* '... 1 , ift, , ,,,,fr.w.( 90 ilk "/ /40, 41k ' 'Alli L_±.6" 4 4'69.. N .1/44 \*01°) / e i s \ — -c--- wir -ir 4--.1 --„„,,, , 14 r:43,":44.. IOW ��I/.may/ 4itidkr4 ® -z- 1 5 , 8 ‘i., \ -\, -] -1, 11 r-imilis 0 r"5.3,,,7, -:%-,, 4 i ....-'-' I ' --........ , , N---->"" INIIIER WO Ve# o' MO 11 1° i ' I t I 10 [� \ \ 1PO it r, ill N ! 1----_ Mr l C �11r \ j , l12 13 14 15 2 ' 5 \824 25 \w`148THA E1 \ 7I I ! I ( ,.. \ 1 I Direct Wetland . Impact Buffer Impact Area —�— / 10,150 sq. ft. q 47,969 sq. ft. APPROXIMATE SCALE 200 0 200 400 feet Virtual Wetland Impact wo .1 se - • P ____ Buffer Replacement Area �� 9,200 af ----- ---_ 54,242 sq. ff.. . TERRA CONCEPTUAL WETLAND MITIGATION AND Wetland Creation Area ` MAVE eRAGI G PLAN w 36,1 19 sq. ft. \\�arair ASSOCIATES Renton, Wloshington Ref. Preliminary Site Plan by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Date 4/27/99 Figure 4 December 6, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes ► Page 428 Agreements(VoiceStream, agreements for the former City Hall building: the first two with VoiceStream Sprint&AT&T) and Sprint for roof space for antennas and a portion of the 7th floor for equipment; and the last with AT&T Local Service for basement space to house fiber optic communication links to serve other building tenants. Refer to Finance Committee. CAG: 99-088,New Fire Community Services Department submitted CAG-99-088,New Fire Alarms for `• Alarms for 200 Mill Ave S the 200 Mill Ave. S. Building;and recommended approval of the project, Bldg authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$32, 877.95, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $1,586.77 to Automated Communications Corp.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Plat: Anicello,ROW Development Services Division recommended Council acceptance of the Dedication on Newport Ct NE dedication of a portion of Newport Court NE for public road use to fulfill a requirement of the Anicello Short Plat(SHP-96-073). Council concur. Executive: Volunteer& Executive Division recommended renewing a contract for volunteer Special Event Coordination coordination and special event coordination services with Sonja Mejlaender for Contract, Sonja Mejlaender January 1 through December 31,2000, in the amount of$45,000. Refer to Finance Committee. Plat: Maplewood Estates, Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions,of the Maplewood Preliminary(PP-O , fi Estates Preliminary Plat; 218 single family lots on 62.7 acres located south of SE 128th,west of 152nd SW,and east of 148th Ave. SE. Council concur. Police: Adult Supervision of Legal Department recommended adoption of an ordinance defining adult Children in Vehicles supervision of children in vehicles. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Transportation: I-405 Corridor Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a proposed "Purpose and Needs" "Purpose and Needs"statement for the I-405 corridor to fulfill Environmental Statement Impact Statement concurrence requirements. Council concur. Airport: Boeing Co. Lease of Transportation Division recommended approval of Addendum#18 to LAG-65- "Apron C" 877, lease with the Boeing Company for"Apron C"located on the west side of the Municipal Airport,to again allow the City to use this area for month-to- month aircraft storage. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. Regional Issues: Sanitary Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a proposed sanitary sewer Sewer Service Boundary service boundary agreement with the Coal Creek Utility District. Refer to Agreement w/Coal Creek Utilities Committee. Utility District Public Works: Talbot Crest Utility Systems Division requested authorization for a temporary closure of a Lift Station Project portion of Talbot Crest Drive for up to eight weeks in winter/spring of 2000 for (Temporary Closure of Talbot the Talbot Crest Lift Station replacement project. Refer to Transportation Crest Drive) Committee. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from James Smyth,president, Rolling Hills Village Citizen Comment: Smyth— Homeowners' Association,PO Box 656,Renton, 98057,expressing concern Kensington Crest Condo that the Kensington Crest Condominium development project(at 3500 SE Development;Traffic Control Royal Hills Dr.)will exacerbate existing traffic problems in this area,and on South Puget Drive requesting installation of traffic control on South Puget Drive. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. f• 1! CITY F RENTON ..ii Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tann''err,,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 26, 2000 Craig J. Krueger Core Design Group, Inc. 4205 148th Ave.NE Suite#200 Bellevue,WA 98007 SUBJECT Maplewood Estate Preliminary Plat Minor Amendment J Request Project No. LUA 99-069 q Dear Mr.Krueger: This letter is sent in response to the minor amendment request associated with the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat. Your proposed amendment to move former Lot 68 to a new location north and adjacent to Lot 130 meets the minimum requirements established in order to approve a minor amendment request associated with an approved preliminary plat (Renton Municipal Code 4-7-080M). The change requested would not impact lot access, utilities or approved conditions of the plat. Therefore,the proposed minor amendment to the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat is approved. This decision to approve the minor amendment request is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 PM, November 9, 2000, as established by code (RMC 4-8-110). Please feel free to call Jason Jordan at(425)430-7289 if you have any additional comments or questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, a eL tUa Neil Watts, Development Services Director c.c. Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Parties of Record Yellow File 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �a_.. -- NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. k 1_______ I SITE STATISTICS APPLICANT e uw,�uocwn , ______ 1 , I e"-eonr AK.xe,uJn ld AMA D"nRom APTMecAnLT w AOlS rwxuaNc.YL�ww.Tox row a cc iAcr CC 411MID wo VAN ae c YARp R/B� l [#✓NATION 31000 ODIC YAMS MA N• wTM AK ILL.BDIt!]00 YA 'CA'..A'roof BONBPeR OlRA�O CUBIC YMCA !A»)w-IRTI N. CCIOACr.GRAND A 10"LObRp"DAD IQVN Ao V�MOt1�fM�11- -_ I I Rvriw a Y..tGga�•�i _-__-V_O/N 11L I 1 --�.111 boo SCALE: 1' = 200/ -- I __ r • - SEA SHE: . r • • I t • If//'' smvcr at 2a( e1. aif N ZM n A ' I CXIEND 1 i_ r _ID M[WIN JJ• B-J' I.J' YAIOI QS1Y.CCIt _ •"CIF I ` ROAD l'Dr<M IBIy N KY ofDl]V CRAM { I J, _ L Y z N»y'OAV YL ON:RCACAVAIE CIRN AM 9KC(gIR • _ �v�- ARCA ID PROW!'A A1IA611 Y.B-BATE - `1 J'CL1(NrCOVOICIC JO NNUO p •• M AA0 0 COKJVCT WAWA(CL"B (B•R10f N 09Kw1 K ':,1±:., � .____—.—____ _ ____ AND nIDCR _ ♦•Baa•nttRNEREI 0_0 . -.2.-::L.._ Y.- '-- 4"4.5'1"a : • i , \ S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS _;• 1 • all 1 ---- - illS1 Ili NO SCALE IIIIM . . ---:----. '-r' ''•.!'.'s. At i 4 a - - NW oO iPr //- , _ II,f---- ---- R/Y J0•NN A "a:C 0101, R/Y 0 %/ / I , )' JJ-III'-a IB' 6' 1' IB' JJ' 1' • •`� J _ ,• •Y• '-•1•DICK C13101 r1PRwL PAIL[Nl �IE ` kDDD �I../� • p ( L4E '-COa�%IC AYIwLM ttCIAW OR MT SKFC KAI.CAL nAPB B QIn(ll 0 _0. N Bt- i�Pup 11014 VARIES ttcnav c-c CO j C.-O,• RI- J�/�� --.. / I S.E. 132ND STREET O O � Ste/ r O �O/,-ri R� ,D F ,o R~ 2 W / / J to 41 et pp �S lI �' —Ti IB' l JJ' r 2 1 o°eo4faeomm �• O ,r�I - _--_- __ SELDOM A-A • —Q�Mi �� - r: r 148TH AVE S.E. x»-Do•iaw ' -•ra, - (S.E. 128TH 3T. TO S.E. 192N0 3T.) • 4. __---___ NO SCALE 4116 ------ gA T - RAI 11' RAI d,.• 1 B JJ 1 14 o Y( uS SiI 5. I _ —Ira'. °J I o r • I CC1401 LUVac,E Y'YnRttCBAV 8-8 E COVO1 KRRfGL CORO of CUTTER o E O ° SHEET OF TYMCAL tlAh3ITE ROAD-SE01mm -_ ` - # - NO SCALE ,R . °'941e3.R J / JUL.24.2000 10:39AM�CORE DESIGN INC II! /� N0.354 P.2 ( ^/� / 11 ',1RACT Cam• /r VFW SPAS_ (.14' J OPEN OPACE/./ jiyI / ,� / _ �• r•�TSI I — ( 111111 I I I I I ��i �u41,5f g t_riVt- L. - 'ion / _ , a 7 ,...dmalsilw?----.. .0.0- 1- ‘ .• (-- ,y----A ---- ' / ..."-- AI,IIIIIII i �' / 1111III,I \ A/ , YI �j II 201 202 203 ._ fA� r I I I I I 1 / - f %1.;.5. �' TI I I IIIII,I I 1MCT41 pF''i I I I I I I 11 Oi,fN : C ( fit� 1 ',t5r)d a' 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11'I I / I 0;;.k)r��r,, I / I I':Ii'I','iI Iii '1'I'I i.�n4kdr] 109 • III lir —. �dci� _ 16i(( :�1,��.1)1 /.� 200 03 94 :a ' / ki I 195 _ 1 1 ( r 0— 5 1 • in 1 / ► / ,11 I_0 e 107 \ I / / 1 ,11115 i1I111 205 I 195 re* \ . 1 // 1 I — - a' 111 / Il,'11 tog i �..� ;Intl / I 209 ) 103 IIIII / /9i 100 90 es 1I11 %. ,/(N, / / 207 — i • 191 . i / / / '" i 1 o Akoppr° • / 199 � 120 /9411* / cr; • ,\ 106 , e, Z, (/ . ,<,......-••' 4'4 ' "................... I I I III I I I PAR.\ II1I111, IIIIII1I1I1, \ 1,1,I, I 111i11 / , �, N/7 A ________ ,II __III 11,, JF 1 , II,I F i 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 - 1 , 1 l tas \\:: to »e I, , 1 148 • d, 54 _ Al,. > #411 . _ ______ 102 170 171 172 174 175 14tr / T 147 r , II 1 7, , 1a1 , _ _ \ f TaB 157 136 15b 104 163 132 151 j 1 - C1N �� - - - 19 / mr♦ 120 130 •iJ 132 133 134 135 ¶35 137 ( ` f, 135 139 140 141 142 143 '� \\�_� - -- 4 ------ --- ' l'� —_ �. /'t1 W.Ba,d Buffer(sort) at Rood Craulnp. P145 .. - 10,710.q.rt. .1r ar Rood Can.6v,Uan a r i:• &XV Impact Nee (Bull*,i.e.Om 500) .+�, 47.262.q.0. Ion Ana r_ Ball.r Raplaavflenl Haa l 7 (Buffer Crater Nan 50111 ^ 1 Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 _ Page 12 _ lot sizes due to the mix of R-5 and R-8 zoning that applies to the site. The applicant will have to revise those lots which staff noted did not meet lot width or pipestem or access regulations of the City. 20. The plat will be providing mitigation not only for its traffic impacts but its impacts on the Fire Department and the parks of the City as well as its impacts on the Issaquah School system. This is the first plat covered by the City's endorsement of mitigating impacts on a school system. 21. The interior street system appears to provide a reasonable extension of the City's grid street system while protecting the wetlands. Those lots accessed by private access roadways do have reduced usable yard and open space on lots served by these systems. The City Council might want to review this situation since in some cases yards, particularly front yards, are substantially reduced leaving not much more than a paved driveway or turnaround serving as the front yard. 22. The development is in an area which has appropriate services available. It will increase the tax base of the City and as noted provides a reasonable selection of lot sizes for those who want larger or smaller single family parcels. 23. The plat does a reasonable job of protecting the wetlands while providing needed access. 24. There will be stub streets that will eventually create through links to other areas. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each such street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approva. of the City. 25. The plat shall contain language clearly defining the limitations on access to the wetlands that border the new single family homes. Similarly, signs shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the ERC threshold determination prior to recording of the subdivision. 2. Lots 7, 17,40,49 and 70 in the R-8 zones area of the site do not comply with the minimum lot width standard of the R-8 zone. The applicant shall revise plans to meet the minimum lot width standard. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 3. Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zones area are adjacent pipestem lots. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on these lots to require a shared access driveway and to require common maintenance of the driveway. The restrictive covenant shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant sh ll be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V • October 26, 1999 Page 13 - 4. The applicant shall widen the access easements serving Lots 121 through 126, Lots 115 through 120, Lots 133 through 138, Lots 105 through 109,and Lots 139 through 144,all located in the R-8 zone, to a 26 foot easement width in order to meet private street standards. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain. access from the private streets. The easement and agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common storm water facility. The agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall create a homeowners association to be responsible for maintaining the common opi.n space areas on the site. 8. The applicant shall pay a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District equal to $2,797 p r residence, for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that ar also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. It is possible that rooftop water might be needed to recharge the wetlands, and this should be investigated as it is generally cleaner than surface flows from driveways or roadways. 10. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each stub street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 11. The applicant shall erect signs that shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 12. The applicant shall erect fences between private lots and adjoining wetlands. The Variances are approved subject to the approval of the Preliminary Plat and the conditions applied to the plat. ORDERED THIS 26th day of October, 1999. itift; FRED J.KAUFMA HEARING EXAM rir $T Op 64` DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (07/(W. L 4\ SEATTLE DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS ` •N • ,,TA P.O. BOX 3765 ? ",1Illj; p, T SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98124-3755 ii.. •�r HErly (O CITY OF RENTON 6'�A,L�.d"-�' A(TENrI5N OF CITY OF RENTON "Jr----_•'--.,, Regulatory Branch SEP 16 1999 APR 2 0 2000 SEP 2 0 1999 Uvri, Sdego t 5tif-rVcJ4 ,_ RECEIVED 'r'UI4 L,Hv� UIVIJiON � 15 /, 0 / e`,7 f /v CITY CLERKS OFFICE_— , Reference: `47?y0/427 Dear 0) i S • We recently received a copy of the following information from . C/ r/ 0 ee,"7/0 concerning your proposed project( f11,E.Q (L)O -GI✓ / 1 ' ). 4() Determination of Nonsignificance , ) Shoreline Permit ( ) Environmental Checklist ( ) Other: Your project may require authorization from the Corps of Engineers under the following regulations. ( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act ` Q�l Section 404 of the Clean Water Act A Section 10 permit is required for construction work in or over any navigable waters of the United States. A Section 404 permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material in waters of the United States, including wetlands. The term "discharge of dredged material" means the addition, including redeposition, of dredged material, runoff from a contained land or water disposal area, and any addition, including redeposition, of excavated material. These activities can include grading, mechanized landcleanng, ditching, channelization, and other excavation activities that destroy or degrade waters of the United States, including wetlands. The term "discharge of fill material" means the addition of any material used for the primary purpose of creating dry land or of changing the elevation of a water of the United States. including wetlands. The placement of pilings constitutes a discharge of fill material when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill material. The term wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstance do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. If you have any questions concerning specific permit requirements, please contact 4.0 ry /YLQ f--14 3 at (206) 764-6290. Enclosed for your use is our permit application materials. Sincerely, /----------Zi__ fig;D:7 T--- Rcbert H. Martin Chief, Application Review Section CC , C_(-y v+ Ref tvrl Enclosures , LUA • 99 . 0(Q`fir;l- DODDS ENGI 1111) September 17, 1999 CITY OF RENTON DEI Project No. 94168 APR 2 0 2000 Peter Rosen Building,Planning, Public Works RECEIVED City of Renton CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Maplewood Estates 99069 PP, ECF,V Dear Peter: Per our conversation, we have made some very minor revisions to the preliminary plat map for Maplewood Estates. These revisions involve the widening of some of the lots in the R-8 zone to assure you that the interior lots are a minimum of 50 feet wide (average) cvClillft,1 ' and that the corner lots are a minimum of 60 feet wide. The affected lots are 7, 17, 40, — %k 49, and 70. f't4(,,c ( J ii We have also added a note on sheet 1 Of 4 to indicate that the right-of-way radii at the 4'1` intersections will be a minimum of 15 feet. 6 ' - Attached you will find two (2) copies of the revised storm drainage calculations which address the increased detention requirements per the Mitigated DNS issued by the Environmental Review Committee. This increased detention can be accommodated in the southwest corner of the plat with no changes in the configuration of the lots or the storm drainage tract. Please call with any comments or questions. Thank you. Sincerely, DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. (..,eix(,)0 j ./ tAit.(8,- CITY O��EA NI REC ' i Craig J. Krueger Vice President-Planning SEP 1 7 199g BUILS:::'.:.^_� ','ItI!$ N cc: Ron Hughes, Burnstead Construciton Planning•Engineering•Surveying 8 4205-148thAvenue NE Suite 200 Bellevue,Washington 98007 Tel.425-885-7877 Fax.425-885-7963 941681#3.doc E Mail.office@DElonline.com ,I 41 v WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources JENNIFER M.BELCHER Commissioner of Public nds DATE: September 13 , 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON TO: Peter Rosen SEP .I , 1999 City of Renton Planning Dept RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way REV Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON APR 2 0 2000 FROM: David John Weiss RECEIVED Resource Protection Specialist CITY CLERK'S OFFI South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Maplewood Estates LUA-99-069 , PP,V, ECF ACTION SPONSOR: Burnstead Construction PROJECT: Timber Harvest/Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal. [X] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA Center - DNR SEPA#: 16797 SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 1950 FARMAN ST N I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW, WA 98022-0068 FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY:(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER 6�i1 di 77.'1) CITIOPIF RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen December 8, 1999 Mr. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No. PP-99-069 Dear Mr. Hughes: At the regular Council meeting of December 6, 1999, the Renton City Council approved the referenced preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the hearing examiner's recommendation, dated October 26, 1999. Pursuant to RCW, a final plat meeting all requirements of State law and Renton Municipal Code shall be submitted to the City for approval within five years of the date of preliminary plat approval. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, • Marilyn J/'a S en City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President King Parker Peter Rosen, Development Services Division Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 / FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer a p CITY OF RENTON j , ':;: Planning/Building/Public Works /�'"�� ._ r OCT 2 6'0 0 ril.si�1 : Q .� O 5" 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington wIFliailppcASS�. SEA -,,~:61 10 1' 0 M7 ,n ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7158401 U.S. POSTAGE • U JWJ Ellizabeth Duff 15300 SE 132nd Court Renton, WA 98059 DUFF300 980593009 1099 17 10/30/00 FORM 3547 DUFF 3540 E STATE 2 BELFAIR WA i1 11,1„hddi,,,,I,I„I,i,„ili„I,1„II,,,1,I,1,1,J,1,„IId CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 1. . SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER staff contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Correspondence.. File No. LUA99-069,PP Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept Approval of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat was published on October 26, 1999. There were no requests for reconsideration and the appeal period ended on November 9, 1999. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the conditions outlined on pages 12 and 13 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat • l•i r� I • RBI ./xA .T: \ % 4 -� '., •-• CIT' OF -RENTON ..i� • Planning/Building/Public Works Department _ „ • Jess,-Tanner,Mayor • • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator ,' CITY CLERK(2) ..f.; :\: 1 T i�l \ n»,il ''9'1'.:z ' Gl fY OF RENTON • MAY 0 2 20Q0 • May 1, 2000 : - RiECEIVED .• 4 ITY CLERK'S OFFICE • SUBJECT: PLATS RECENTLY ADDRESSED: • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please note the following new addresses assigned to. recently approved preliminary plats, final plats and short plats in the City of Renton. You should add these addresses to your databases. Attached new preliminary plats and short plats: Briere Creek Preliminary Plat PP-q61- 131 Briere Preliminary Plat fP- 01 -003 Candlewood Short Plat 5+119-oo-o3I Chow Short Plat 5+IP— gq-cril City View Short Hat S+WP-qg- 1'1.3 Clover Creek/Labrador Preliminary Plat PP- fig-t g. Conrad Short Plat Elizabeth Place Preliminary Plat PP-qq-I SD Ernst Preliminary Plat PP-a9-iLIS Harrington Square Short Plat S1iF-qti- I32- S�Q_98 1 Honey Creek Heights II Short Plat Keith Short Plat 5-1P- `l61-I y — Kirkland Court Final Plat tP-'1a-152- Manson Short Hat 5}IP-Ts'-itg PP`ac 0 Maplewood Estates Prelim Hat Miller Short Plat 5 H P- qq- oV7 SW 4th Place Short Plat 514P-9<1-01 I Talbor Ridge Final Plat FP- qc1 -ib5 Teri Short Hat S+tP-a`t- Ig3 Wells Preliminary Plat fp_gq- ogq Sincerely, Jan Conklin Development Services Representative Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 • • • #1:utilltr ' r ,1055.South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 a :f : : :.• This paper oonWns 50%ricyded mater{e1,20%poet co sumer ,"\./ .. ...7.'. . ..g 27761 .T.,„ '',,,,t, -,p. j , 5a 7-4-TES M .r 3s 0 35( YI' 3 , 3yy 30 F err V ,o ,� a .0 .�o ' 3(-? 3r3 7,0 - /jam J 1 r /• `^,FYI ��,k;' "'k( F( 5u°6 67/1 30� *61 Co I tx d 17 b . �' Si HE 'dp So r s�1 9 z 41 205 fa5 \'ti s� �. 1 ,,s�` 4 ' +t-a.r mili" li0-1527.-co 7„.1 1111,' . ./all" Aiiii&Y '0 ..ifilt,..,.... 1 , , . • . .20. .....,,.., ;41.1r.i., •''. .' . I = ---73-- ----"- - ' ; :I/ -. • : ___ ____ - °/1/4 1 fr.'81 - �' .., , .o ff `� T6g iaE3 r�old ili L•B.P,,,gbef A. • 'V .i..; :o G sr/ "�a w — . 4,�j •� 37 S'� oc e a' •�__ /T� 731 /p4 /' iiii11 Y v, io y L,T 593� L /D b� Z ',� /00 60,.. h ,,i,,,,7, 59�7 sib • b 600 1•... • ;- (, �- 4 10„VA •\ 170 .N 5:N.41-,•T''''''.'' ''••.0 4V k 1 e ' Al 11 I I I I 1111 _ - .60 iiictit 411:10 '�'�a i `ti �r 0 a,0 - yo,. ,,,:ilt‘ .).41414‘ I el, . vfo Nii-,01 ,..o.,,,,q-,A1:,..g.t,..1,911 .1., '.,„;.:,:i...;:;::::.rL:,...:,....:$ ,.., . ,_:;,,It 1 ---- - -(fir _•� Q �- fia • • • NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. _J -_-- crtY OF RoamI Tt- I SCALE: 1" = 200. ti , r T ,1 • r • I �� I 1 "0$ i M»gym°['".T — ti �;h --. �~'� _ ,T1„ LEGAL DESCRIPTION °4. 1. . Ou+EwAPRLICA NT o rw.. 0,1 �• ! PARCEL A. ICS•+QrzOIM ACKNE..NM •',.o a �I M AST NA,p M LEST WL,Cr M N INTINE r CIMIST R p MGM,$4 r.rMl�utOl r00. ■112 —'_,al-a I Twe.w)a NORIu. THAT.[A.".uw7,T[r?Ta w c.n 0 FEET SELLEM R 4 wws ] '�, I� 5 12 I Q 1•EAST LK p M K.T,O FRET 0.sAio OJECNM ON MO[M['T TRAT[YrCARMT .i ----. SE SHE=Lw�' �`Ya __ PORTION T!tp LYING uT w(M EMT MOO R[r o M MM./..Sao MT w ,y • +__I�\• \►_ CMOOC,lD NORM~N K�iu�COSMT w 050 GCVO wTaew�ama ro�R wm.��r PLM!£R/E IRD.M dl¢vE70R '� i aaNN \ N I� • O ��• 01n1.aRT. ( (M►-vIMM501040W01 i 1, p,�0•'I,: .I PARCEL 000ACT.5050 1000,1101 45??•Planr• Iig d • 4 4 4 Aid A eql-i M[Yr MIR p M.CST SEAL.0'M NORTME T C.EARTER p SECTION M a CITY Q Rp(TON �' ,' I TOSS MI MOON RANGE.EAST.uLLurETT[MEMOIR(IN KM COOn. II N MY'O.y I. � �_ 1---...... / T� ' WWWrpi[H'GLA M EAST SRT . M NORMYT OAST??p M NOIRNIC.T �g T.W,S T ' j �,•` TIT ._. _..I�.. ._.__.._ ._ OYRI[R p M NORTILEIR OYRT[I4 APO[MAT M CAST,O MEET p MAD .T. 4 ''' � IMENIS[S CO LRED TO MEI COURT ROR ROAD.YO[MEM TWAT PORTION '.47,• ; , ' ioc,5„k b• «aoa.mN",ocau.T,«v[RORm..TCMr[I.reol.v,,, SITE STATISTICS _ dLl y�' d►`�`�i.A 4:4 - QIV(sION J _ [e'°Ao M .o"E :NY ee.••... I► �. 117 $10 \ NORTH OF&E.tsam aT. BENCHMARK '"" " �- ..-. a '--_...--_ TOTAL SITE MM., L1H.Vl.N.(MUM,MIMS) A '��' I lSvl M AK/rem Art p RDOO1 WMT O1 IMM.NN DATIM IoiliSili ,, n : • 11��_ `��`� 1�.�I rT•I.N.)'ERAl4 FRAG[DkIG M M M.K ATS.T.laL OaRI0 Y1f. MOLE PANSY IGF[. AR `• .TJ.MON M SE. ND.6.wTw 14 DN.CN I SIP MASAI..1-..1 �I1 �- I' ./`♦,* .VC* *se��`41 '/ [C.M411 OR(IMAM MTh, Y TOTAL • 3 ~ , '�.dD�, — �� `; `` �i�4•,.i � EMTM.H.IRON/SRAM MRAC[DISC.M M M.a G.111.t _ -�.fr [xurMo raNala R-.-Iwm w x ISM N. 8 --- -- &I0/ amp F `ff_► - • WSW AISA. O].AG MA%p HTP 4 Ser./OIJ�9.4741 /( 41' II, orwMW. .AAc(l.a,pMV O O i i irir/ - _. --,..,4., �Ir,��!�I _I" �irls: - L n. •c s _ c _ _ b �I R 1_— `11ll:'imi 4i cc. ---4: 4.1.34121"Proy• Alik: : 2.-Iik'--1 • i• I.......2***"fc. I • ;7.-3-7.. -_-...''•--.-,-...,---r--- --- 1. , 44y;14.3 r Ad,P/kAtkijr," 1 .1 , .p.4;-- ._ .i. ti.y. _i;p16. ,r 0 0 wv , N Z CI AA 6,1m%illy: 41r 41r,"7.--.). _ _ __ •Ba ..... ee _DIVISION 2 + 'T .•,�.1 It l - 'l�, - . _- ET 4 • 6® ® wok", BOUTH CP b .3 • a --- _- , _ I _ cj .__. _._ �'` - - O I. +� i j, ,i,,1i - y• I- .. . ' . \r�~' ^ 'i •V f-' i » ' - r - - ' \ lLMTTI _•t A _ � -L. _ - p + . , o . ;1 _f:�I.te'I L' - _J.N MLXI ® • `-la ealli RENTONw CRY Leine _ . - 1 SHEET INDEX — — o N i 'Ir ;; a' :'g- W 1 0 r —� `' ,a. o o i I T• I':( SHEET OF ® VICINITY MAP ® NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ' 4 N r.,as. N t•,0M, .ROJECT Nwats 84168 1 ,.. • I I 'I • • I e i^__`__� NOOv44! �' 4s�n - ' y i• : ix t. 60 ' f/ I 1 i - '1 •• - • • . i I r / 1 ----� ---- J C 1 7 1 • I ;; I _J 1 f 1 1. ae'rawn}n. L 1 1 _ .. '- .n L--'O' --J ' ! I S 1 d `1� 4 I L - `\ 1 I L I d • c 1 --- _ ) L---P- I r ` ` "_ S •r 1 1 1 I pp f w `• Y ^ i L 1 4 � ' 1 L 1 ilg I' et, -I s r , Ir li d = 1 i l'I N l I J I • .- :is' It ♦ I ____m J ////// Pi If 111 m mCA '2 '1 CRr1 m O .T ;J ti ' W ..� 3: „ .I / 10 _• .,.. �: I' III ' NP°rJrni - '-- --- 7n1ila` _-. . _ / I • ' N N N f N N N' N . N N. N N N N 1 a I w I 1 I I 1 I I ; 1 I 'IL_---- ;----�r----1 z • y•( t' O `v i..d 1 ..---- 1 1 I I �i 1 1 I 1 I l i I I 1 I 1 I I ." 1 1 I I 1 I. I i I' 1 1 I ,-- I I 1 1 I I ` ` 1 1 ' rnN N N N N N N N N N `. ' ____� j `+�� I. JC v1 rn I I ' i •: J"-6 a I t I al y[6a I I a I a l f,C I Lta, r 1 I } 1I1 r--••--_ m_ L 1 SI =� l i a r �l� r L l I ` -P -J C,1 1 y� 1 1 1 I II Z I • ' '' 9Y / r ' r it Ir--------1 L 1 TI L L a i / e L i 1 Y 1 = `r.�_.. i . 1 1 1 I I r 1 L I•• L•' ' l--_ j NCp77.412 / 1PJArt ,;\ i d a8� ' s\ - -----1/g 1: I 1 I 5i � y , �':- �,I' 1 •I iLJ * M '4 1' . . ...,,, ,./1-1 I r. I 1 • I _ - - — — - - — — ...._• NW 1/4 SEC. 1* TWP. 29 N., ROE. 5 E., W.M. 11 N 02TE APITC J'a Mt . 1"O ir.➢., Oa.t PRELIMINARY PLA ME T ' . Acassnnuttcan -sat 005I WCD CA uRA!Q/T — 1�' #; .ORAW 1 MAPLEWOOD ESTATES t - _ - m "°°ROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION- ""," M a,,;°r ` II., C1.W J 241.41 DT MO-LION AK N!...FIT NIAng - _ PROJECT ru«OOO — F'1J[1tK aO9w,cmv JeOEO lrwNyhp (qlp aPL1A/(aJp aELiNl hr T✓ _ _. _ XaCiNI .i. Et-ts i .1..1.NrW 0N1)1 • ra 1u I 811�1L )41la, \ 1 ' l�� ''Zt►LLLI_ -s„` ...._111,61t00 88 i, . 1 4,11:7,-: !:,>'-.?..'-''7,7:;::1--7._"...::::-.-:,;,,--:-;:::7',ett:f. ---_---. ' ...1, . / ,S , (...-':rf,,-----1"--k 1 .1 fill 1" \ '44 - dilfr--;:ri .. ci / �F -- li it ` 4\ �v.l ®t om'. .4 • , • �ef. ,,, /� .04.0 , , V_::_--- 1141 , . ' --' ,, ..,,,,,itil:je.4400, u.4, gre \ ,,;,,, �w �"• — . --_, „ * 4 „Alk 0. r . At'ft . 747:-„1,-','..-.. ,::::--- ----- _ ---Ail r #e" .."0,,,,Atip A.,...4140 1.11,100 SHIN i .-:_711 '. '1r 11 --T.-#/0. friAti4761„,,011101.1,4174! \ 1111, vlor; MNNMMI LI\ ir-I1-i_-,' g' •i, AM IdVAiPVI te O7dl -A4PA4 ;4i II E ri �t ce' �d,,F1 O*TliTyIlALVWr 1If y aIaL n 1 s�;��' �� V�irofiwoompianDwir- 7_7_ -,ilsifici_tia-7-..b . iimmosuc 1 c . ...... ..„ 1 46/1410/61070•....4_ __ Mrt ,®c . .1�.� 1'6 v� I \ abrierf\-? C„izL is V. .\ mak. -41b•- '4.‘ kiiiii '':. ...,.• ' ..,, '\-_,.1 ,,,7 , 9 4 g t ) . 444.‘-‘,..viiiet ..... --1/41411:IN‘ AIPAIOr ' .--—- ' pr ): 4:41-koviik.. .il .. 1.... .. ‘..,, -,,,,,, fa, ir .,ilp .u.Nnoo 01,11) 1 U :kk4N:114:41.NO 5-Auft.--4•.:c•ii r A : off ,'N\ '0. VI, 14 .. ...,,,, If iii , 4111111ikk 'Nk. s•!*I Pr _ 4 ,)\,. At . .111. --Nv .dl, ..\%.. I* r .l'H 1 kNI..*N1 thA% 14 !, 4 1 . 1 -1,,icii.i: fr \\...‘ ta L*4b.. ICA1046114k4"111 f AAt - A,. ,4 ......,A._ O HlzlON < <►. Mai ". • �,I Iiiii\k4.\7`. .fist, `r \1 5_.- - lit.*:ww- ° / �r �.�`r I�� ,\1`��h, ^' �i� a o� 1.`i _, \ f 1,19 ,91.88 N S► ' 111 f as0 � n a i 4k`�.Nk,. r I s-a Vwroz 75• '•••� 116yr4a AgilliZ'zi 6ii niN { �� ` Y \\ --} f `W%XN . �, :as as V `�• "� • I L. 1 , _ .` 19 \ N DSO I , ,: jot, � 1 „le,,,,, ,A Il n. `Qa ,�km-.r- 41,74- , _ r o ..y,-:-__.----.,-i---c.. l.... L , -N411- 1:.) ' . lit 4\ i_________S'f. i V ) c 111 • .— .4> <=ig -...\ ii4 gr i., 2. 5_, ;_im ,.,..„ , . , f . i II ci . /11,111t-.4 ..' . . ft6r. • 1 - \, - a ski; Atri ili , .. .e•r 3 , ..1.: - • . -t'b.\-----v. —41)() Mk etland E•• ✓ 4 S ;77iiii‘;'.14.'-iiiitio. '}g wI M U flood t \ 'f •a 4 ril/iD vl1 • D.763ueated 1. '7 eq.Rs a I t 111,,l' A , I:7 ....: i r--;<-- . Ck'.-/)\( 4 '1/4 -..-C I r-/tom .�.srll AVE .E. Sy �r o- .4 I di.M .•.1 •.•:wG - -Q Wetland Areas APPROXIMATE SCALE 200 0 200 400 feet Cy Approximate Off-site Wetlands WETLAND LOCATION MAP ,--; ' TERRA Maplewood • Data Point Locations � \\ 'Renton, Washington �� ASSOCIATES a Ref.: Boundary and topography survey by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Environmental Consultants Proj.No.T-2798 I Date 4/27/99 I Figure 2 • • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. r I i il • II • . • • j r -- ---_.. — — -- r — p Epf11, man,ma l- _ " oi . - t _ . . 1 ---"N —4 •" 1 "k) i t tIP — ! 2.- x.l t , Iaours rriswloi I POPEP POLE SCA 4.\ . \x- 21 xs ��w; ; I » . _, » € l f+u J1E�k.'I Y3 "''" �� '"� SCALE: 1' = 501 N.G• D C a ;tee u — � I LAD_ �—°..� ,, - y x '' 41 -t-- ---)-- ill a 8 • 1` '° ii 3 �\ y s y O .. , 22 Ki ----- . . 0 1... ca .aon buhlk LEGEND Cq 1♦mow ar$R� - • �+� � '" ., :. + r • R ..I<MDIUHT v, ~a f /� I x Yxs` , I / 1 D s • • r A �IiP I•_ _ __I / I z —Yo—srrwocwm crxraaa a=v.Tlw ' O Y i;1' I I E \ - ---`- - J 8 'Drcwrolw o.[rwTIOII j,0 O$ LI J 3 O ,r l \ Ins i • I v h 44 CC �� 1� :A I• �w j 1 T. .3 , m i { p �pC. E e D T. O O L — .l y \! seik E �� I' `' U . • I < „ //1 xf•anol W ti • k. if ��w ....J ` rI' w •��11 i I \ ' SHEfT p[ I • M.h•..>•swcw wru •I I \ >: .I xx IT L \ •s • L. o' �� I •I. 2 Y SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 Moncr M.au 94108' • • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. I SEE SHEET 2 cF 4 • r i_ r 1 �� i I '�>.•°^off• n • -_.. _ aC_ SCALE: 1` >a 50: I IIIII*%6-- �=.aw�` 3 , ,, 5 • • i.. 1 \ 1 '•• 1 • 1 1 I i �I / q 1Kbloe anew YDM�• \ 1 1 n \ . ' ' I , 8 ,� I ND . 111 ;III . , I z/ i \ jn y / / / i 8- - il', I '�t �� / N DD•71'FJ11 77lGX = �.w I� �I1iJi 11. �1 `'.\.IIlEnaom E { II m11J(1 ^ f- 11 �,/ ' / \/ tI1 /M l3 ��/ � - = {I I % w\ i4 .lig f , • 1 /- t \ 70 \„, 3 ,Il I I 1 ; —/i - i ., L e'er I .. -emu,_._ _ 1 \_-1! 0. �,f ��/ /10,41,+ !Aiiiç • / g /#1, ,. : , , / , 01/ , I/ ow. h, 'v ��rata! if/ ,A\--,,.... .// , ii......... _ -,p : . - - / . if? ( `•� _ is lika21 . ":• ":"3:-) 4 / - en ` 1 Of. D C,,, ►� // uEr t— ms . 1 / e / j /',• / \ mMI•� III i / ZITS/I{ETLK/ �� /IJ +wK+D / \ / / `,i�I'(/ / , • ' ----- -. ' A.� iIelk 0 `� ��►- isp��Q C��_ '�/L��srrr •.�s ze,....j.4 2 1: ' 1 i -.7 / 1 1 I,• i • / . / i_• ..L4'� `�L,2.x.r ��,,-1_�a��=ate �1 1': , _ �a li .i�I d kl .. 2 :I ; `oiio is if /. , / •�� J,Iro I 1 O R 1 I :�a 3, •• I 1// i /)f/ii _ ..„....1........ ,,,....... N MITIG.......... .._ wEr,....ATION, J. l,I �, I D _ .13' h iiiiiiiii .,.. .mtw. At i I ' �. \ Y -.' / % I�, '' / // / 411rill?: --.' 1 : >o(. „,, ,:c t ,.. i .,. ; ; . • iv 1 / k I w1 ( / / I � I� . w1 (.EIMOA/ ,I I !`. 1i Fi 'r ' IN �$ • �iii J 1 +u .v o V y .. . I. 1 wna+oc l ��' / I I h ; ;11. W N i Q 1 t / ., 1 � isi �� i T. w ' ,Illy' , I 3. o 0 0 <' eii I i ---- ! r_-✓ / I' o �I I:Q SAE tr 'ov 1 DO BEE SHEET 4 cF 4 ..o r..ro.e II .. F i/ - �_' �lae �A \i.a A - • t .4. ii_-_,A=L..—raltm T._ , : , 1 ,____4.,___\___ ____. , ., • -i----.N ‘ .„,.... — S ' 11 , \ . \ \ . *. \ S% 1 . . r ) ___ .W. \ \., 'A; .:.- . ' .7"\ \i ... o \ �, 'i C '*...' „\.,k4•...;\.:..f ' > \toga"\. II I 0 0 /1")&461,,i \ _. ,- - A -'..A . )1 : ''; - ' L '3 `> Irak \ G ice' _"'_ _ y \,..\ ,..,. i:...----_\ , ,, ,..,__J ri----- .r. I r /. #,- • . ,, .,... . -, .-N. . i 44, 14 ' • Are ; ; --/ /7 .• ,. ./ g ,, liii it i.. riltkb/„ .,K /:• \ \ ti ;CI IIIitalt4lkir, i iglin X wIII .:NIN m .... ,,,,,, _- 1, - - --" _ . .,.. liarimi4 (. _.-... . : c1 ..1 ___. , .I. El in . i. - 0 ., , \ ,___ , . . .., ,. \.. ....._ _ , , _ 4, , .... \ ,...) aim lioN .11/111111ill , /140*-----A) • . N , , , ,,,- -,/__ _ , NEI \\,. NEI / . ,„ ..,44 -• bII. it. � mmi. ..:-,.*-..,-..--4 0, ,, 1 i ium ff .. „---,k,- ...= , .1 ItoPp', , , , IIIIIII '_ • Mt . l' 4# ;/ IC. +4 :: 1 'EMI ' ' 'bt4.7'. ..........,_ 117....;"":721grium.7...._ 1 :ga 1IIIII®�•. Iii En , I. _,......._....dgir l ; -:---_, , „. ., / ,i lkl . *4 . C. 1 1 4".=,_ 18") • / 1 A 1 - ' ,-44Vp..;4. ,----A______ ; iiLàt Iii1ii • • _w ��m-H 00Is•e ' N.: .. . 1 /2 . .. . . , ..".0. ,...• _.... . ' Ix I ` w, --� ." . ':,•, I{ ] DATL wI,I.rr f _I - .. . u R+AS.1 . , i.1 - a --OAEUM WARY UTILITY 1 GRAD/NO PLAN , o� "D"'D�`D �AQ9"`" MAPLEWOOD ESTATES '� 0 r.��j� ..y .DAAMN L21L 1 ai D APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION "'^^"'g- """"'"�'L'�"'� ^ - RA.0 IGI((Q,t - I'2'J-MN AK It( A/a ZI' ,,g pq 4171 f Nana w '• 0-. ' - 41110 CITY OF RENTQN CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING', fi On the Zil � day of S�-1:e_wA,L e.1r , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a p,ealed envelope cgntaining t-4eah 1�, tkoL(44 t V documents. This information was sent to: Name Recresentinq k\-u cA1Ae.5 Bu_vv- t-ead eti vts-tvuckttrv, 1? r ;nLH 5oe. 1FIray\bLit, Claud DoKVNe l 6 tNU-1.1 SCLUH V1 ipevi Iti eta ySlnkr O tc# v.oi(LS. t\lo\ree 1n - (Signature of Sender) SSA-- tL • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for `the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. MARILYN CHEFF Notary Publi m and for the State cL9 Washington NOTARY PUBLIC i Notary (Print) AAI STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmer s.IM�AM. CHEFF e COMMISSION EXPIRES Lr ENi-EXPIRES:6-21303 JUNE 29, 2003 ` Project Name: WeLoo Ecto5 PP Project Number: LuA 619 0( q r PC�i El NOTARY.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL RENTON,WASHI GTONMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environment s a De t lRevteerr minatio n Commnte f (ERC) has of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- lowing pronder a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Renton Municipaul Code. the newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months MAPLEWOODject ESTATES PRELIMINARYauthorityofthe prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language PLAT continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers There are eight wetlands and an intermit- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a tent stream on the site. This proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Location: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street) on the north,SE 136th Street on the south, between as published on: 9/6/99 Avenue SE48th Avenue SE and 152nd Appeals of the environmental deter- The full amount of the fee merged for.said foregoing publication is the sum of$57.50, urination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. charged to Acct. No. 8067. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee Legal Number 6538;' with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 9 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov- erned by City of Renton Municipal Code g y Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information Subscribed and sworn before me on this ?q' da regarding the appeal process may be , obtained from the Renton City Clerk's y ofL- 5C , 19 Office,(425)430 6510 A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular /� meeting in the Council Chambers on the oQ`o0011lfSP¢po�PA''B n . t seventh floor of City Hall, September 28, C.1 / CX�( 1999, at 9:00 AM to consider the o� tr,� . r;,00B Preliminary Plat and Variances. If the o` v••.ti,'-,• :4:- a `>� Environmental Determination is appealed, .: << Notary Public of the State of Washington _cy the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- Q'" . n residing in Renton lic hearing. Interested parties are invited tg Y: Stu T4 : y= attend the public hearing. --,_ _ King County, Washington Published in the Soth County Journal Pi:J C q September 6,1999.6538 FROM :RTN ELECTRICAL SYST 2343300 1999,0E-28 05:40 #521 P.01/01 10415 - 147th Avenue oc Rarrtan, WA 98059 D B M E O U f2 September 27. 1999 l5 Hearing Examiner 1-111 SEP 2 8 1999 City of Renton 1055 S.Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Npjj EARING RENTEXAMNER Dear Mr.Examiner; RE: BURNSTEAD DEVELOPMENT--Maplewood Estates My name is Claudia Donnelly and I live at 10415-147th Avenue SE, Renton. I sent this letter to Mr. Rosen with questions and the questions weren't answered. So, I would like to ask them again. TRAFFIC The Traffic Analysis prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. , shows that the second entrance to Maplewood is through a King County residential development from SE 132nd St. onto 156th Avenue SE. How many vehicles will be using 156th Avenue SE and SE 132nd to get to their home in Maplewood? There are 15 homes on this road--which is,essentially, a one lane road. Barely two cars at one time can fit on this road. What safety items does Burnstead propose to put on this road to control the speed and traffic coming out of Maplewood? Do they plan to use speed bumps? What other mitigations are planned for this residential area? Will they widen the road? Is the developer working with King County to develop a safety plan for SE 132nd, SE 138th St. and 158th Avenue SE? Does the developer have a Traffic Concurrency for this development? At the Intersection of SE 132nd and 156th Avenue SE, what safety measures will be used to control the traffic coming from Maplewood? Has Burnstead done a sight distance analysis for the exit on SE 132nd and 156th? When I traveled down this road on May 24, 1999, looking to the north, there is a telephone/electric pole that blocked my sight. Will there be a traffic signal to control the additional traffic coming from Maplewood? Will there be a separate left turn lane from SE 132nd to 156th so they can get onto 156th safely? What will the developer do to 156th Avenue SE to make If safer for residents along this road in view of the additional traffic coming from Maplewood? Residents north of SE 132nd St and 158th Avenue SE report that In the morning there is a long backup south on 156th from the stop light. How will the additional traffic from Maplewood affect this traffic problem? Residents also have difficulty in crossing 158th Avenue SE to get their mall and paper. They have asked the Renton postmaster if they can change the location of their mailbox. The Postmaster says "no because there is too much traffic on 158th Avenue SE. It would be too dangerous for the mailmen." If it is too dangerous for mall trucks on 156th, what will the additional traffic from Maplewood do on the road? Currently, Fire District 25 Is having Increased difficulty In accessing the right-of-way due to the heavy traffic on 156th. How will the additional traffic from Maplewood effect emergency vehicles trying to leave the fire station? How will the additional traffic on SE 128th(NE 4th)also impact the Fire District emergency vehicles in trying to make a response? Litter is another problem with the greatly Increased traffic. Road noise is another problem. Trucks coming in from Maple Valley come up 156th Avenue SE in order to avoid the traffic in Renton and 1-405. They turn left and continue to Duvall Road, then continue their trips to Bellevue. How does the developer propose to mitigate these concerns? How will this impact the intersection of SE 128th and 148th Avenue SE? Post-it°Fax Note 7671 Date 9 '34,99 Ioegee► To From MgS' �I�r M. bonnelly Co./Dept. Co. Phone M Phone p Fax,vLi�sl�l�o -�523 F9Ylt \1X12.1L/-6C.ZQ t-KUM :KIN tLtUIKIL:HL 5Y5I 2a4J,600 1885,08-28 05:42 g522 P.02/02 ' Maplewood Creek to Cedar I . How will all the additional water effect lewood Creek and Cedar River? The developments Include the Mr. Van Gard Self-Storage Facility, Windsong, Windwood and, now, Maplewood Estates. Windwood was platted in King County, but the drainage will still run from Maplewood Creek to Cedar River. Renton must adhere to rules to help preserve the sockeye salmon. How will increased runoff flows(from Maplewood Estates) effect private properties along Maplewood Creek? How will these new developments Impact Cedar River? According to 10% annexation petition for the Morrison property, 90%of the property drains into May Creek. Where will the additional 10%go and how will that effect the flow from the Burnstead property? How will then the combined water flow/sediment coming from Maplewood Estates/Morrison property effect Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? Why hasn't Renton accepted stricter storm water standards other than the 1990 KCSWM Manual? A Renton planner recently confirmed to me that Renton uses KCSWM 1990 manual. This is almost the year 2000. Why is Renton lagging behind? According to the 10% petition for annexation, the Morrison property will have to use the 1998 KCSW Manual. How come Morrison--which drains into May Creek-- which also have a Chinook salmon population in it,has to use the 1998 manual and Burnstead --which drains into Maplewood Creek and Cedar River --gets to use 1990 manual? Isn't the Cedar River Chinook Salmon population just as important? I have some additional questions regarding surface water drainage. 1. What will the increase in sediment/water flow coming from Maplewood Estates down Maplewood Creek do to the cut throat trout and Chinook/coho salmon population In the lower end of Maplewood Creek and in the Cedar River. What will this do to the spawning grounds located at the lower end of Maplewood Creek for these fish? 2. What will the additional storm water from Maplewood do to the erosion problem (already present in Maplewood Creek)--downstream from Maplewood? What will Burnstead do to help stabilize and prevent further erosion problems for Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? 3. Will the increased water flow and sediment(not all the sediments will stay In the detention pond) eliminate the Chinook/coho salmon population In the Cedar River? 4. How will Burnstead keep pesticides and other chemicals from flowing into Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? How will these pesticides and other chemicals effect the salmon/trout population? 5. WIII Burnstead use an all/water separator to keep street oil from flowing into Maplewood Creek and Cedar River, thus keeping the salmon and trout from being destroyed? Who will maintain these anti- pollution systems? 6. What about the overall impact of Increased sediment/water flow coming from all the new developments on the East Plateau effect the Cedar River? What about the downstream impact to the Chinook and Sockeye Salmon population? 7. Why can't Burnstead use a high-flow bypass pipe to take the water to Cedar River instead of having it go down Maplewood Creek? And If so, how will the velocity be reduced to prevent erosion at the pipe exit? How will the salmon/trout population be protected? 8. Has Renton given its approval to the Non-point Pollution Action Plan for the Cedar River? 9. Has DOE issued a NPDES permit to Renton for the area east of Renton--the location of Maplewood? Does Renton have a NPDES permit for the city? 10. How will the phosphate levels be controlled? 11. Will there be appropriate detention pond controls --- set to 1999 standards? LUN I 1 NUt I-hKUM 1-1H1at UU1 1' 12. Who will be required to maintain the detention ponds? Will there be a homeowner's association to keep the ponds maintained and cleaned? Will there be something in the homeowner's by-law spelling out who will take care of the detention ponds? 13. How will the Induced Growth Doctrine effect Maplewood and how will it effect the Cedar River Wild Chinook population? I would hope that these and other questions are answered before development is allowed to take place. Thank you. Sincerely, Claudia R. Donnelly FROM :RTN ELECTRICRL SYST 2343300 1995,09-28 05:42 4522 P.01/02 What about the proposed street of SE 138th St? When does Burnetead propose to push this other access street(SE 136th)through? What additional Impact will this add to residents of 156th Avenue SE? How many vehicle trips will use this road to exit Maplewood? What does the developer proposed as mitigation to King County and the residents living along 158th Avenue SE, SE 132nd St., and SE 136th St.? Has the developer and the City of Renton taken into account King County's planned rerouting of its garbage trucks? KC garbage trucks now leave the transfer station, go west on NE 4th St. into Renton and then out Maple Valley Highway to the Cedar Hills Dump. Once the new Cedar River Bridge is constructed, King County proposes to send its garbage trucks --up to 60 per week-- east on NE 4th (SE 1281h)to 156th Avenue SE, down 156th to Maple Valley Highway. How will this additional truck traffic effect the intersection of SE 1281h/148th, and then to the other entrances to Maplewood Estates off of 156th Avenue SE at SE 132nd St. and SE 138th St.? What will this do for the SE 132nd St., and SE 136th St. entrance? In addition, a major focus of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan (Objectives T-J through T-N)"is to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicles. "(Final EIS for the Cedar River Basin Plan and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan). How does the developer plan to keep the daily round trips down below 2000 per day? What incentives has the City of Renton given Burnstead to keep all this additional traffic off SE 128th? Will the City of Renton develop new park and ride lots for the people In this area in order to keep traffic congestion down? Has the developer/City of Renton talked to Metro about new bus routes for this area to keep traffic congestion down? I also have some additional questions-- listed below that need answers to. 1. What is the current capacity of each road (156th, SE 128th(NE 4th), 148th (Nile Avenue), SE 132nd ) based on "long distance between lights"or "short distance between lights"? 2. Are planners using PEAK hour spreading to shift traffic off of roads during their busiest times and assuming that commuters will shift their driving patterns to avoid gridlock? 3. What volume over capacity score did critical link roads have in the area? 4. Has Renton done its own traffic analysis of the roads In the area-- 158th Avenue SE, SE 128th(NE 4th), 148th Avenue SE (Nile Avenue); SE 132nd? If so, what does the data show? 5. Is Renton exempting any roads from the critical links test? 6. Are they(Renton and the developer) accounting for ALL growth in the area, including growth of county area and proposed areas of land to be annexed by Renton outside of this proposed development area? 7. Is Renton/the developer planning for schools and other critical infrastructure that will add traffic? 8. Has the City of Renton done its own analysis of SE 132nd St.? if so, what are the conclusions? Has the City of Renton done its own analysis of SE 138th St.? STORMWATER CONCERNS Within the last several months, the salmon population within the State of Washington has become more of a focus and concern with some species being listed on the Endangered Species Act. Maplewood Creek flows from the East Renton Plateau to Cedar River--which has a Wild Chinook and Sockeye Salmon population. The City of Renton proposes draining storm water from several new developments through •• M, CIT s 'OF RENTON ..1. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 22, 1999 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED SEP 2 2 1999 HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Mr. Ron Hughes, P.E. Burnstead Construction Company 1215— 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-99-069,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Hughes: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ha ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final. As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall on September 28, 1999, at 9:00 AM, to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat and Variance. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, tY4' Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: C. Donnelly, R. Noreen, T. LeMay, H. Reynolds, D. Stanley, R. Pinkley, J. Tarantola, S. Nipert, E. Duff, S. Day DOCUMENT2 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 [il TI. nn nn.nnnln Inc Gllo%.un••nloi/m�Inr.�l 7110%n.... ..............•. 4 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s)listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148th Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended east/west through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street provide internal access. There are 8 wetlands and associated intermittent streams on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 sq. ft. of Category 2 wetlands and compensate for impacts by creating 36,119 sq. ft of wetlands. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and streams. Location: South of SE 128th St. (NE 4th Street), west of 152nd Ave. SW, east of 148th Ave. SE. AGNDA CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152"d Avenue SE. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. 2. The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3. The applicant shall work with Water District #90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 8. The applicant shall pay a School Mitigation Fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District, in the amount of$2,797 per lot, for all proposed lots located within the District boundary. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of ttic site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132 Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Observe recommendations of the geotechnical report. FIRE 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300 feet are required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500 feet and will require that Lots 33 through 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per City street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, SE 132nd Street off of 148th Avenue SE shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-foot width each, not the 16 feet proposed. PLAN REVIEW SEWER 1. The development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE)from SE 128th St. (NE 4th St.) to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4th St. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 2. System Development Charges of $585 per single family house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. 3. A special assessment for the East Renton Interceptor shall be required and a latecomer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. WATER 1. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Renton Fire Department Standards/Codes. DRAINAGE 1. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the downstream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements are required for the project as a SEPA mitigation measure. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. System Development Charges of$385 per building lot will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The project will require full street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving, street drainage, street lights and undergrounding of overhead utility lines. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet,with a minimum of 32-feet wide pavement within the plat required. GENERAL All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. POLICE Once developed, there would be approximately 161.32 calls for service (CFS) annually to this development. PARKS 2. Recommend trail connection through site to proposed County Regional Trail system through County-owned Colasurdo property designated for future park development by City of Renton and annexed into the City. May want to consider a notification on the face of the plat that adjacent park property is potentially programmed for active park development. 3. A bicycle lane has been identified on NE 4th Street in the City's Trails and Master Plan. Street improvements should include a 5-foot wide bike lane. 1 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: September 28, 1999 Project Name: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat A plicant/ Ron Hughes Address: Burnstead Construction Company 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA. 98005 Owner/ Burnstead Construction Company Address: 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA. 98005 File Number: LUA-099-069, PP, ECF, V Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148th Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132nd ' Street would be extended east/west through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street provide internal access. There are 8 wetlands and associated 1 intermittent streams on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 sq. ft. of Category 2 1 wetlands and compensate for impacts by creating 36,119 sq. ft of wetlands. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and streams. Project Location: South of SE 128th St. (NE 4th Street), west of 152nd Ave. SW, east of 148th Ave. SE ii....,;'s_ r C_ -. .- •• i-_ -� 'Sr �A 0r.�. -. — ' 'saIt i i ' l_i I �' =il • ,, , ill.i'J 1 ea .. 115 . ;' d .`!I �', � _ _ 1l e tt � 0 .lt�a[� < ;Wm T ''i.. / cr. .... , ..•_ ..„. ... . iri .i, yyruRs 1 . ti -..: _ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pry,.., Lary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT _ LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 2 of 18 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Burnstead Construction Company 2. Zoning Designation: Residential 8 DU/AC (R-8), Residential 5 DU/AC (R-5) 3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family(RSF), Residential Rural (RR) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential, undeveloped East. Single family residential, undeveloped South: King County Park West: Single family residential, undeveloped 6. Access: SE 128th St. (NE 4th St.)to 148th Ave. SE to SE 132nd St. 7. Site Area: 62.73 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: N/A Total Building Area: N/A C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 4760 12-14-98 Comprehensive Plan 4498 02-20-95 Zoning Code 4404 06-07-93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone, 4-2-110.A. Development Standards. 2. Residential-5 DU/AC (R-5)Zone, 4-2-110.A. Development Standards. 3. Street Standards, 4-6-060. 4. Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 7. 5. Wetland Regulations, 4-3-110. 6. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations, 4-4-130 HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prt,n„rniary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 3 of 18 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element- Residential Single Family(RSF), Residential Rural (RR) F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Burnstead Construction proposes to subdivide approximately 62.7 acres into 218 lots for development of detached single family residences. The property is along the eastern edge of Renton and was part of a recent annexation into the City. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by second or third-growth forest. Two zoning designations apply to the site. The area north of SE 132nd Street is zoned R-5 and 74 lots are proposed. The area to the south of SE 132nd Street is zoned R-8 and 144 lots are proposed. Primary access would be from 148nhAvenue SE which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site in an east/west direction, connecting to the existing 152"d Avenue SE right-of-way along the east boundary of the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal access. Eight wetland areas and several associated intermittent streams have been delineated on the site. The wetlands vary in size and quality. Three of the wetlands (Wetlands F, G, and H) are hydrologically isolated and below the 2,200 square foot size threshold for regulation of Category 2 wetlands. These wetlands would be filled for construction of the proposal and compensatory mitigation is not required. The other wetlands on the site are narrow, linear wetlands that traverse the site in a northeast/southwest direction. These wetlands range in size from 8,976 square feet to 74,825 square feet and have been classified as Category 2 wetlands. Construction of the street network would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is proposing to create approximately 36,119 square feet of wetlands in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. The proposed wetland compensation exceeds the code requirement to mitigate for impacts to Category 2 forested wetlands at a ratio of 3:1. Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer width. The applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging, impacting 47,969 square feet of buffer area and replacing this with 69,240 square feet of buffer. The code allows for buffer averaging where the total required area of buffer is not reduced and where the required buffer width is not reduced by more than 50%. The applicant is reducing the required 50-foot buffer width below 25 feet at the road crossings and therefore a variance is required. The application includes 2 variance requests related to the five road crossings over the wetlands and intermittent streams. One variance is from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations that restricts tree cutting and land clearing within 25 feet of streams. The second variance is from Wetland Regulations. The code requires a minimum 25-foot wide buffer for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is not providing the minimum buffer width where the road crosses the wetland. The proposal includes a private developed park, Tract 1 (44,554 square feet) next to Wetland A, resulting in a large open space area through the neighborhood. This open space would provide opportunities for pedestrian trails linking open spaces on the site and connecting to the proposed King County Park to the south. An open space tract along the south boundary of the property would provide a pedestrian access to the future park. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pry,,,,.,,;ary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 4 of 18 The proposed preliminary plat would be developed in 3 separate phases. The phased areas are indicated on the preliminary plat plans. Phase 1 would be developed in the year 2000, Phase 2 in 2001 and Phase 3 in 2002. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on August 31, 1999 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. The appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on September 20, 1999. No appeals were received. The applicant will be required to comply with the adopted mitigation measures. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated (DNS, M): 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. 2. The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3. The applicant shall work with Water District #90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The applicant's share of the signal cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prt........ay Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 5 of 18 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the plat: (a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation. The site is designated Residential Rural (RR) to the north of SE 132nd Street and Residential Single Family (RSF) south of SE 132nd Street. 74 single family lots are proposed in the RR designation and 144 lots in the RSF designation. The proposal has a net density of 4.24 dwelling units per acre in the RR designation and 4.64 dwelling units per acre in the R-8 zone. The RR designation is implemented by 3 zoning districts: Resource Conservation (10 acre minimum lot size), R-1, and R-5. Policy LU-26 states: Maximum development densities should range from 1 home per 10 acres to 5 homes per acre in Residential Rural except in areas with significant environmental constraints including but not limited to: steep slopes, erosion hazard, flood-plains, and wetlands where density shall not exceed 1 home per acre. The proposed density of 4.24 dwelling units per acre meets the maximum density range considered under the policy. The RSF designation includes policies that allow for a development density of 8 dwelling units per acre (Policy LU-34) and a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet (Policy LU-35). The proposal complies with the RSF policies. Policy LU-23 states: New development within all residential designations should achieve a minimum density. The minimum density may be adjusted to reflect constraints on a site. The RSF designation is implemented by the R-8 zone, and the zoning standards set a minimum density of 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is below the minimum density of the zone and this will be addressed in the following section that analyzes compliance with zoning provisions. No other policies of the RR or RSF designations apply to residential subdivisions. (b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation. The Renton City Council approved zoning of the subject site concurrent with annexation into the City. The area north of SE 132nd Street is zoned R-5 and 74 lots are proposed. The area to the south of SE 132nd Street is zoned R-8 and 144 lots are proposed. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-5 zone is 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The proposed lot sizes in the R-5 zone range between 7,200 sq. ft. and 11,660 sq. ft. The proposed lot sizes in the R-8 zone range between 4,500 sq. ft. and 10,345 sq. ft. All of the proposed lots comply with the applicable zone standard for minimum lot size. The R-5 zone allows for a maximum density of 5 dwelling units per net acre. The proposed subdivision has a net density of 4.24 dwelling units per acre in the area of the site designated R- 5. The allowable density range within the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 8 dwelling units per net acre. The proposal has a net density of 4.64 dwelling units per acre. Net HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department PrE........ary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 6 of 18 density is calculated by subtracting environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands and the area of public streets from the gross acreage of the site. The subject site is 62.73 gross acres. There are 3.55 acres of wetlands on the site and 10.66 acres of right-of-way that have been deducted from the gross site area for purposes of calculating density. The proposed subdivision does not meet the minimum density of 5 dwelling units per acre required in the R-8 zoned portion of the site. The code allows the Zoning Administrator to waive minimum density requirements where an applicant can clearly demonstrate that the minimum density cannot be achieved due to environmental, physical or access constraints on the subject property. The subject site is encumbered by significant areas of wetlands, approximately 2.03 acres on the R-8 part of the site. Although the area of wetlands is subtracted for purposes of calculating density, there remains a substantial area of required wetland buffer (50-foot minimum wetland buffer width required for the Category 2 wetlands) that is not included in lot areas but is counted toward density. The inclusion of the wetland buffer area reduces the density below the minimum. Most of the lot sizes are between 4,500 and 5,500 square feet which is consistent with targeted density. The Zoning Administrator, in a memo dated September 17, 1999, waived the minimum density requirement for the R-8 zoned area of the subject proposal. The R-5 zone and the R-8 zone both require a minimum 50 foot lot width for interior lots and a 60 foot lot width for corner lots. There is a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The code defines lot width as "the average distance between the side lot lines connecting front and rear lot lines." The following lots in the R-8 zoned portion of the site do not comply with the required lot width standard: Lot 7, Lot 17, Lot 40, Lot 49, and Lot 70. The applicant should revise plans to meet the minimum lot width standards. The required changes would be relatively minor and staff does not anticipate that the revisions would entail significant changes to the proposed plat. The preliminary plat includes setbacks showing potential building envelopes on the lots. There is sufficient lot area on all the proposed lots for the intended residential construction. (c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations. Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private access easement street per the requirements of the Street Improvement Ordinance (Code Section 4-34). All lots are generally configured with the side lot lines at right angles to the street lines. This standard is not always possible to maintain for lots located along the curvilinear internal streets. Primary access would be from 148tth Avenue SE which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended through the site in an east/west direction, connecting to the existing 152nd Avenue SE right-of-way along the east boundary of the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal street access. The proposal also includes shared driveways and private streets that extend off the proposed public streets. Further discussion of the private streets and shared driveways is found in the section below on Access. Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area of the applicable R-5 and R-8 zone. Most lots meet the lot dimension requirements except as described above. The building envelopes (the area available for building with respect to setback requirements) on all lots are appropriate for construction of single family residences. The code requires a minimum lot width along the street frontage of not less than 80% of the required lot width standard. Lots accessed off cul-de sacs are to have a minimum HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prr........ary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 7 of 18 lot frontage of 35 feet. Lots that don't meet the minimum frontage requirement are considered pipestem lots. Pipestem lots are permitted for new plats "to achieve densities permitted within the Zoning Code when there is no feasible alternative to achieving the permitted density." Pipestems must have a minimum width of 20 feet and the pipestem portion of a lot (that portion of a lot less than the minimum lot frontage required) may not be counted toward lot area requirements nor for the measurement of required front yard setbacks. Adjacent pipestem lots are required to share a private access driveway and a restrictive covenant is required on both parcels for maintenance of the pipestem driveway. Several of the proposed lots are considered pipestem lots according to the subdivision code definition. All of the pipestem lots meet the code criteria: the pipestems are a minimum of 20 feet wide, all lots include sufficient lot area exclusive of the pipestem area, and building setbacks may be achieved exclusive of the pipestem area. There are two areas of adjacent pipestem lots; Lots 55 and 56 in the R- 8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zoned area. Staff recommends that the applicant record a restrictive covenant on these lots to require a shared private driveway and common maintenance of the driveway, as a condition of approval for the plat. The applicant may also revise the preliminary plat to eliminate the side-by-side pipestem lots and the need for the restrictive covenant. Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. The radius of lot corners at intersections is not indicated on the submitted plans. The applicant has confirmed in writing that all the lot corners have a minimum radius of 15 feet thereby meeting the code provision. (d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access The primary access to the proposed subdivision would be from 148"h Avenue SE which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended through the site in an east/west direction, connecting to the existing 152nd Avenue SE right-of-way along the east boundary of the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal access. The improvements of the public streets is discussed in a separate section below on "Street Improvements." The applicant is proposing access/utility easements extending off the public streets to access lots. All of the easements are shown on the plans as 20 feet wide. City street standards allow a shared driveway to access two lots. The private access easement for shared driveways requires a 20 foot width, improved with 12 feet of paved driveway. Private streets are allowed to provide access to a maximum of 6 lots, with a maximum of 4 of the lots landlocked or not abutting a public street. Private streets require a 26 foot wide easement, improved with a 20 1 foot pavement width. Several of the proposed 20 foot access easements would serve more than 2 lots and are therefore considered private streets versus shared driveways. The applicant should revise these easements to provide a 26 foot easement width. The access easements that need to be widened to private street standards include the easements serving Lots 121 through 126, Lots 115 through 120, Lots 133 through 138, Lots 105 through 109, and Lots 139 through 144, all located in the R-8 zone. The increased easement width would not impact building setbacks because setbacks are measured from property lines. The required increased width of the access easements would not significantly impact the buildable area on the affected lots. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain access from the private streets or shared driveways. A traffic impact analysis has been prepared for the proposal by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. The report analyzed level of service (LOS) impacts at intersections that would be affected by the proposed development. The primary intersections analyzed in the study include the intersections at 148th Ave. SE/SE 128th St., 156th Ave. SE/SE 128th St. and Duvall HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prc,........ary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 8 of 18 Ave. NE (138th Ave. SE)/NE 4th Ave. The traffic consultant has indicated that traffic operations at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE would deteriorate to warrant signalization in the near future. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a SEPA mitigation measure to require the applicant to install a traffic signal at the intersection of 148th Ave. SE and SE 128th St. The applicant's share of the cost would be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. The proposed subdivision is expected to generate additional traffic on the local street system. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual which estimates 9.55 average daily trips per single family residential lot, the proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate a total of 2,123 average daily trips. To mitigate for project impacts, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a SEPA mitigation measure requiring a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 per average daily trip attributable to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $159,225. Topography The subject site is relatively flat, with slopes generally in the range of 2% to 8%. The site slopes in a southwesterly direction and there are some small areas where slopes exceed 10%. Topographic elevations range from approximately 500 feet at the northeast corner of the property to approximately 395 feet at the southwest corner. The site topography would not impact the ability to develop the site with single family residences as proposed. Wetlands A Wetland Evaluation/Conceptual Mitigation Plan has been prepared for the site by Terra Associates, Inc. A total of eight wetlands have been delineated on the site. The larger wetlands on the site are narrow, linear features that are associated with drainage swales or intermittent stream corridors, and generally drain in a northeast to southwest direction. Three of the wetlands (Wetlands F, G and H) are exempt from City wetland regulations because the Category 2 wetlands are less than 2,200 square feet in size and are hydrologically isolated. These wetlands would be filled for construction of the project and no compensatory mitigation is required. The regulated wetlands on the site range in size from 8,976 square feet to 74,825 square feet. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the wetlands are classified as palustrine forested wetlands, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). The wetlands are considered Category 2 wetlands according to the City of Renton regulations because the areas are greater than 2,200 square feet, are near headwaters of intermittent streams, and are dominated by a forested vegetation class with minimal disturbance. The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Construction of the street network for the proposal would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. No other wetlands would be impacted for construction of residential building lots. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. City regulations require a 3:1 mitigation ratio (created wetland:impacted wetland) for a total of 30,450 square feet. The applicant is proposing to create approximately 36,119 square feet of wetlands in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. According to the applicant, relatively little excavation would be required to convert these upland areas to wetlands. Wetland A with the adjacent mitigation area and wetland buffers would form a large open space area and wildlife corridor across the site. Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer. The code allows for buffer averaging where the total required area of buffer is not reduced and where the required buffer width is not reduced by more than 50%, or 25 feet for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging, impacting a total of 68,679 square feet of buffer area and replacing HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department PrE,,,,,,,.ary Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 9 of 18 this with 69,240 square feet of upland buffer area. The applicant maintains a minimum 25-foot buffer width except where adjacent to the five road crossings. The road crossings would pass directly over wetlands at these locations and it would not be possible to provide a buffer without converting the existing wetland to an upland buffer. The road crossings would impact approximately 20,710 square feet of buffer area. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from wetland regulations to maintain a minimum buffer width of 25 feet or to not reduce the required 50-foot buffer by more than 50%. The applicant proposes to replace the impacted buffer area adjacent to Wetlands A, B, C, D, and E. The replacement buffer would be provided in 16 areas ranging in size from approximately 231 square feet to 19,985 square feet. A significant feature of the buffer averaging plan is that the replacement buffer area would expand the buffers required between Wetlands A and B, thereby creating a habitat connection between the two wetland and wetland buffer areas. This effectively increases the area of contiguous, well-established habitat preserved within the proposed development. The applicant will be required to submit a final wetland mitigation plan for approval prior to issuance of construction and building permits. Relationship to Existing Uses The subject site was recently annexed into the City in December 1998 and comprises the east boundary of City limits. The area is rapidly developing or redeveloping at urban densities with the recent availability of urban services, particularly City sewer facilities. As is common to recently annexed areas or areas at the urban fringe, the site is surrounded by a wide mix of lot sizes. There are larger parcels mostly in the 5 to 10 acre range, as well as more standard single family subdivisions (with lot sizes of 5,000 to 10,000 square feet) that are both immediately adjacent to the site and common to the surrounding vicinity. There are several recent large subdivisions in the immediate area including the Windsong and Windwood plats. The proposed density is less than most recent subdivisions due to the inclusion of a large preserved open space area through the site associated with Wetland A. The proposal meets the density range and minimum lot size of the zoning designations that were adopted for the subject site concurrent with annexation. The access to the proposed subdivision is designed to minimize impacts on adjacent neighborhoods. The single family residential development is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding uses. The Maplewood Heights Elementary School borders the site to the west. The proposal would not directly impact the school because 148th Ave. SE would not be further improved south of SE 132nd Street. (e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff have indicated that sufficient resources exist to provide services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide required improvements and fees. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a fire mitigation fee of $488 per new single family lot to compensate for increased demands on Fire Department services. The Fire Department requires a fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures. The proposal site is located within the service area of Water District #90 which would provide water for domestic and fire needs. The Fire Department has expressed concern over the Water District's capability to provide 1000 GPM flows to fire hydrants. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a SEPA mitigation measure to require the applicant to work with Water District #90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements would be available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences would be required if the fire flow does not meet the City standards. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pr€........3ry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 10 of 18 Recreation The proposed subdivision includes a one-acre private park in the south portion of the site. The park would be improved for use by residents of the subdivision. The park would be adjacent to a large, preserved open space area composed of Wetland A and its buffer, a wetland mitigation area, and an open space Tract F (248,617 sq. ft.). The open space area would connect through the subdivision and provide natural area for habitat value as well as function for passive/active recreation. In addition, there is an undeveloped King County park (approximately 20 acres) located directly south of the subject property. This parkland is expected to be eventually annexed into the City and improved for active and passive recreation. The proposal includes an open space tract to provide an easy pedestrian access between the proposed subdivision and the future park. The proposed plat includes several common open space areas and landscape easement areas. The applicant should create a homeowners association to be responsible for maintaining the common areas. King County Parks and the Renton Parks Department have requested a trail connection to link the park property to the south with other County-owned parcels located adjacent to the northeast of the subject property. The trail segment is mapped as part of the County's Regional Cedar River to Sammamish Trail system. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) recommended that the applicant work with King County to provide a trail easement connecting the County park property to the south and other County-owned parcels located to the northeast of the subject property. The proposal is expected to increase demands on existing and future parks and recreation facilities within the City of Renton. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a park mitigation fee of $530.76 for each new single family lot to mitigate for potential impacts. The proposed on-site park may be credited toward one-third of the total parks mitigation fee. Schools The subject site is located partially within the Renton School District and partly in the Issaquah School District. The school district boundaries follow the alignment of SE 132nd Street through the subject site, with the Issaquah School District to the north and the Renton School District to the south of SE 132nd Street. The City has agreed to collect a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District of $2,797 per residence, for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that are also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The school impact fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The School District estimates that single family plats generate approximately 0.44 children per single family residence. The proposed 218 lot subdivision would therefore be expected to generate 95 to 96 school age children. The Renton School District has been notified of the subject proposal and has responded that the schools would be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development. Storm water A storm drainage report has been prepared for the proposal by Dodds Engineering Inc. The report estimates that the developed portion of the site would be concentrated on approximately 48 of the 63 acres. Approximately 15 acres of wetlands, wetland buffers, and park would be preserved in a natural state. The developed portion of the site would be improved for single family development and would yield approximately 48% impervious area and 52% pervious area. All site drainage would be collected in a roadway drainage system with roof drains connected directly to the system. Portions of the stormwater flows would be directed to the wetland for recharge purposes. The proposal includes a large, 2-cell stormwater pond in the southwest corner of the site. The 2.33-acre stormwater detention pond area is designed to hold a live storage volume of 205,000 cubic feet. The pond would be designed to retain a volume of water as a pond amenity, and sized for water quality treatment. Discharge from the pond would HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre )ry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 11 of 18 enter the existing swale which flows adjacent to the southwest property corner. The stormwater facility was initially designed in accordance with the King County Stormwater Design Manual. The subject site is located in the Maplewood Creek drainage basin. There are ongoing erosion problems in downstream portions of the creek. To ensure that the proposal does not worsen existing downstream drainage problems in the area, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) imposed a SEPA mitigation measure to require additional stormwater detention. This condition has been required through environmental review for other developments located in the Maplewood Creek drainage basin. The mitigation measure requires: The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2-year 24-hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 10-year and 100-year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The applicant has provided staff with revised storm drainage calculations subsequent to the SEPA determination to demonstrate that planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by the mitigation measure, Staff recommends that the applicant record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common stormwater facility. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities The proposed development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148th Ave. SE from SE 128th St. (NE 4th St.) to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4th St. The sewer mains serving the site would need to be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. King County Water District#90 would provide water service for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required to meet Renton Fire Department Standards/Codes. Adequate sewer and water utilities are available to the site to serve the proposed residential development. System Development Charges will be assessed for each additional lot created by the subdivision. Street Improvements Plan Review staff has recommended specific street improvements for the proposed internal public streets as well as adjacent right-of-ways in a letter dated February 2, 1999, addressed to Craig Krueger of Dodds Engineers. In terms of internal streets, SE 132nd Street would have a 50 foot right-of-way width through the site. The other public streets would have a minimum 42 foot right-of-way width. The proposal indicates a 44 foot right-of-way width. All internal streets would be fully improved with 32 feet of pavement, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along both sides of the street. Cul-de-sacs would be platted to a minimum 50-foot radius and paved to a minimum 45 foot radius. Street lighting would be required, meeting lighting levels established in City Code. The proposed subdivision complies with these standards. Plan Review's letter also discusses street improvements to adjacent right-of-ways. North Side- SE 128th St(NE 4th St)- The right-of-way width at this location is shown on some maps as 60 feet, and 84 feet on other maps. If there is only 60 feet existing right-of-way width, an additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be required to accommodate a future five lane roadway, with bike lanes and sidewalks. The project will also be required to construct curbs, gutters and HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre my Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 12 of 18 sidewalks along their frontage of SE 128th St. Street lighting will be required to City of Renton's standards, and which will be owned and maintained by the City. East Side - 152nd Ave SE between SE 132nd St and new southerly access street to project - This existing right-of-way is 30 feet and width, and improved with pavement from SE 132nd St south to the wetland area. No access to the plat is proposed from this right-of-way. The adjacent property to the east has already been platted, with separate access via SE 132nd St to 156th Ave SE. No additional right-of-way dedication or street improvements are necessary for this section right-of-way. The remaining portion of the right-of-way to the southerly access street is covered with wetlands. SE 132nd St east of the site to 156th Ave SE must be paved to a minimum of 20 feet in width to meet minimum standards for emergency access. 152nd Ave SE between southerly access street to the project to SE 136th St - This section of right-of-way is also currently 30 feet in width. This street section is to be improved to provide access east from the project via SE 136th St. This section of 152nd Ave SE must be widened with a minimum dedication of an additional 12 feet of right-of-way. Street improvements will be required, including 32 feet of paving, curb and gutters along both sides of the street, and a new sidewalk along the west side, and street lighting (either City or Puget system). SE 136th St must be paved from the site to 156th Ave SE to a minimum of 20 feet in width to meet minimum standards for emergency access. South Side - SE 136th St right-of-way extended - There currently is no dedicated right-of-way along the south side of this site, with SE 136th St right-of-way existing both west and east of the site. Our recommendation is to require a fence along the southerly boundary of the proposed plat, with no right-of-way dedication or improvements to be required. West Side - 148th Ave SE between SE 128th St and SE 132nd St- This section of right-of-way is currently platted at 30 feet in width, and will be used as the primary access to the subdivision. An additional 30 feet of right-of-way dedication will be required. Full street improvements will be required, including 32 feet of pavement, curbs and gutters along both sides, and new sidewalk along the east side of the street. Additional pavement width may be required at the approach to SE 128th St to provide separate left-turn lane, depending on the recommendation of a traffic study for the project. Street lighting will be required for this street, to be owned by the City. 148th Ave SE between SE 132nd St and SE 136th St - Due to several wetland encroachments into this section of undeveloped right-of-way, no additional dedication or improvements are recommended south of SE 132nd St. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre iry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 13 of 18 G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat, File No. LUA-99- 069, PP, ECF,V subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to recording of the subdivision. (2) Lots 7, 17, 40, 49, and 70 in the R-8 zoned area of the site do not comply with the minimum lot width standard of the R-8 zone. The applicant shall revise plans to meet the minimum lot width standard. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. (3) Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zoned area are adjacent pipestem lots. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on these lots to require a shared access driveway and to require common maintenance of the driveway. The restrictive covenant shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. (4) The applicant shall widen the access easements serving Lots 121 through 126, Lots 115 through 120, Lots 133 through 138, Lots 105 through 109, and Lots 139 through 144, all located in the R-8 zone, to a 26 foot easement width in order to meet private street standards. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. (5) The applicant shall record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain access from the private streets. The easement and agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. (6) The applicant shall record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common stormwater facility. The agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. (7) The applicant shall create a homeowners association to be responsible for maintaining the common open space areas on the site. (8) The applicant shall pay a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District, equal to $2,797 per residence, for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that are also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The school impact fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Preliminary Plats (PP): Three (3)years from final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre........Jry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 14 of 18 E. VARIANCE 1. Background The applicant requests approval of 2 variances that are necessary to allow five road crossings over wetlands and associated intermittent streams. One of the requested variances is from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations. Section 4-4-130C.4. Restrictions for Sensitive Areas states: "No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty-five feet (25) of the ordinary high water mark of creeks." The second variance is from Wetland Regulations. Wetland regulations require a 50 foot buffer width for Category 2 wetlands. Buffer averaging is permitted provided an applicant can meet the criteria of Section 4-3-110J.7. Criteria e. of this code section states: "That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging. In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard buffer or be less than twenty five feet(25) wide." Construction of the street network for the proposal would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. The long, linear configuration of wetlands on the site necessitates road crossings in order to provide access through the site. The applicant has attempted to locate the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. In fact, the only direct wetland impacts of the proposal would result from the road crossings. The applicant is proposing mitigation to compensate for the direct wetland impacts in accordance with code requirements. (See wetland discussion in preliminary plat report). The Category 2 wetlands require a 50 foot buffer width. The road crossings would pass directly over wetlands and it would not be possible to provide a buffer between the new road construction and the wetlands without converting the wetlands to an upland buffer (resulting in further wetland fill impacts). While the code permits buffer averaging, and reducing the buffer width to 50% of the required standard or 25 feet, the road crossings would result in no wetland buffer. Therefore, a variance from the wetland buffer width requirement is required. Wetland variances involving Category 2 wetlands require approval of the Hearing Examiner, subject to the specific criteria listed in Section 4-3-110Q.4. of the Wetland Regulations. Most of the wetlands on the subject property are associated with intermittent streams, which are generally seasonal surface flows through the wetland. The City of Renton does not have a stream classification system. The wetland study characterizes these intermittent streams as Class 3 streams, according to the King County classification system, because the streams are intermittent and have no potential for salmonid use. Four of the five proposed road crossings over the wetlands would also cross the associated intermittent streams. The Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations require maintaining a minimum 25 foot buffer from the ordinary high water mark of streams and the regulations also apply to intermittent streams. The required buffer cannot be provided at the road crossings and therefore a variance from the provision is required. There are no specific criteria required for variances from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations. Therefore, the standard variance criteria listed in Section 4-9-250.B.5. apply. 2. Applicant's Proposal The applicant evaluated several alternatives to mitigate for the reduced buffer at the road crossings. One approach considered was to designate the wetland area within 25 feet of the road grading limits as an indirect wetland impact, and to include that area for wetland mitigation, as if the wetland area was filled. There would be approximately 9,000 square feet of additional wetland impact area under this approach. With a mitigation ratio of 3:1, this would require 27,000 square feet of wetland creation. Grading to create this additional wetland area would require clearing existing vegetation and result in additional disturbance to the forested area adjacent to the wetland. The wetland consultant determined that expanding the grading for wetland creation would result in more significant impacts and that the additional wetland creation would not increase the wetland functional value within the developed project. As an alternative mitigation for the reduced buffer area adjacent to the roadways, the affected buffer area has been included in the buffer averaging calculations. The applicant is proposing to preserve 69,240 square feet of upland buffer area adjacent to site wetlands to compensate for 68,679 square feet of total buffer impact area. The buffer impacts related to the road crossing are approximately 20,710 square feet. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pm iry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 15 of 18 The proposed mitigation would not result in additional site or wetland impacts and would replace the habitat area represented by the reduced buffer. The mitigation would replace the affected area with well- established habitat area. A significant feature of the buffer averaging and buffer mitigation plan is that replacement buffer area would expand the buffer between Wetlands A and B, creating a habitat connection between the two wetlands. A large, contiguous natural area would thus be preserved on the site, encompassing the linear Wetlands A and B, adjacent created wetland area for mitigation, a 50-foot buffer from the created wetland and then the additional wetland buffer area. The buffer averaging plan maintains a linear natural corridor that connects through the site providing residents with passive recreation and a trail system. The additional buffer width added to the corridor would provide more interior, protected habitat area, thus increasing the overall functions and values of habitat on the site. 3. Variance Decision Criteria: 1. Variance from Wetland Regulations: Review Criteria: The Hearing Examiner, in granting approval of a variance, must determine: a) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including the size, shape topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated;and The wetlands on the site are narrow, linear features that cross the site in a northeast to southwest direction. It would not be possible to design a road system that provides access to utilize the site without crossing wetlands. The proposed subdivision and the road system have been designed to continue the City's modified street grid system and to provide a series of road connections to adjoining properties and to public right-of-ways that currently abuts the property. The wetlands are a special circumstance applicable to the subject property. The strict application of the Code would then deprive the property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. b) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated;and The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to public welfare. The street crossings are limited and have been located at the narrowest part of the wetland/stream system. Direct wetland impacts would be mitigated through wetland creation and the stream flows would be maintained through the site. No adjacent properties or public facilities would be impacted by granting the variance(s). The proposed modified grid street system would provide improved connections, both pedestrian and vehicular, thus benefiting current and future residents. c) That no economically viable alternative with less impact on the wetland and its buffer is physically and/or legally possible;and The road crossings are necessary to provide access through the site and maintain a modified street grid system. Reducing or eliminating road crossings is not an economically viable alternative for development of the site. d) That there is no feasible on-site alternative to the proposed activities, including reduction in density, phasing of project implementation, change in timing of activities, revision of road and lot layout, and/or related site planning considerations, that would allow a reasonable economic use with less adverse impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers;and Because of the linear shape of the wetlands on the site, road crossings are necessary to access all parts of the property and to provide east to west connections. The proposed density of the plat is already below the minimum density allowed by the zoning. Further reductions in the number of lots that would result with reducing or eliminating road crossings may not allow a reasonable economic use of the property. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pm iry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 16 of 18 e) That the proposed activities will result in minimum alteration or will be designed to improve the wetland's functional characteristics and its existing hydrology, topography, vegetation and fish and wildlife resources;and The project has been designed to limit impacts and result in minimum alteration. Wetland impacts have been limited to road crossings and the number of crossings minimized and placed at the narrowest portions of the wetland/streams. The proposed wetland mitigation plan and buffer averaging plan would mitigate for wetland impacts. Final engineering design would incorporate measures such as siltation prevention to protect the wetland area and streams during construction. Other design measures include culverts to maintain flow across the road berms and stormwater treatment facilities to limit impacts to groundwater and surface water quality. t) That the proposed activities will not jeopardize the continued existence of endangered, threatened or sensitive species as listed by the Federal government or the State;and The wetlands and intermittent streams on the site have no potential for salmonid use, according to the applicant. The application materials include a Wildlife and Habitat Evaluation Report, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) were contacted to request database searches to identify documented occurrences of sensitive, endangered, or threatened species in the project vicinity. The response from the WDNR Natural Heritage Program (WDBR-NHP) stated that their database has no information on threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of plants in the vicinity of the Maplewood site. They also have no information on high quality ecosystems in this vicinity. The response from WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Program (WDFW-PHS) included a Priority Habitat Map with accompanying computer data for the Renton quadrangle. This data shows no records of any threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife within one mile of the Maplewood site, and no priority habitats are located on the property. Several wetlands in the May Creek and Cedar River basins are mapped within one mile north, east, and west of the site. g) That the proposed activities will not cause significant degradation of groundwater or surface water quality;and Surface water runoff from the roads would be directed to catch basins and conveyed through the stormwater system to water quality treatment and stormwater detention facilities. The proposed activities would not cause significant degradation of groundwater or surface water quality. h) That the applicant has taken deliberate measures to minimize wetland impacts, including but not limited to the following: i. Limiting the degree or magnitude of the regulated activity;and The number of road crossings has been minimized to limit the magnitude of impacts. ii. Limiting the implementation of the regulated activity;and The road crossings and wetland impacts have been minimized to limit the implementation of regulated activities. iii. Using appropriate and best available technology;and The applicant would use stormwater quality controls, erosion controls and road culverts to minimize impacts. iv. Taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts, and The road crossings and wetland impacts have been minimized to limit the magnitude of impacts. v. Using sensitive site design and siting of facilities and construction staging areas away from regulated wetlands and their buffers;and Wetlands and wetland buffers would be flagged prior to site grading to minimize disturbance. vi. Involving public natural resource management agencies early in site planning;and HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pm. ry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 17 of 18 The applicant has contacted the Department of Fisheries regarding culvert design for the intermittent streams. Other agencies having interest and jurisdiction in the proposal have been notified. vii. Providing protective measures such as siltation curtains, hay bales and other siltation prevention measures, scheduling the regulated activity and site maintenance to avoid interference with wildlife rearing, resting and nesting, or fisheries spawning activities;and Erosion controls would be required for the duration of construction on the site. viii. Creating a separate sensitive area tract or tracts for areas determined to be wetland buffer in field investigations and determined to be impacted by the permitted activity. City wetland regulations do not require separate sensitive area tracts for wetlands or wetland buffers. i) That there will be no damage to nearby public or private property and no threat to the health or safety of people on or off the property;and The construction of the road crossings through the wetlands as designed would not result in damage to nearby properties and there would be no threat to the safety or health of people on or off the site. j) That the inability to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant in segregating or dividing the property and creating the undevelopable condition after the effective date of this Section. The applicant has not segregated or divided the property. k) That if new government and quasi-government facilities are granted a variance under this Section, they will meet the following additional conditions: This criteria is inapplicable to the proposal. 1) That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant has limited the number of road crossings and located them at the narrowest portion of the wetland in order to minimize impacts and minimize the variance from wetland requirements. 1. Variance from Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations: The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The wetlands on the site are narrow, linear features that cross the site in a northeast to southwest direction. It would not be possible to design a road system that provides access to utilize the site without crossing wetlands. The proposed subdivision and the road system have been designed to continue the City's modified street grid system and to provide a series of road connections to adjoining properties and to public right-of-ways that currently abuts the property. The wetlands are a special circumstance applicable to the subject property. The strict application of the Code would then deprive the property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre,......._ry Report to the Hearing Examiner MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF, V PUBLIC HEARING DATE:SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 18 of 18 The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to public welfare. The street crossings are limited and have been located at the narrowest part of the wetland/stream system. Direct wetland impacts would be mitigated through wetland creation and the stream flows are maintained through the site. No adjacent properties or public facilities would be impacted by granting the variance. The proposed modified grid street system would provide improved connections, both pedestrian and vehicular, thus benefiting current and future residents. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The approval of this variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege since stream crossings of this nature have been allowed throughout the City and are recognized as being necessary to provide for street connectivity within neighborhoods. The City has encouraged street connections instead of a series of cul-de-sacs and dead-end road systems. The plans for Maplewood call for a blending of through streets and cul-de-sacs to provide the connectivity while limiting the impact on sensitive areas. 4. That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant has limited the number of road crossings and located them at the narrowest portion of the wetland in order to minimize impacts and minimize the variance from wetland requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the two variance requests for the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat, File No. LUA-99-069, PP, ECF,V. HEXRPT.doc • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ho(tC.-e, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres f BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for sing,te family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south pat R-8. Primary access would be from 148' Ave SE, which is located along the west boindary of the site. SE 132n Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132° Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet IUl. 3D C nLrAlLut c1mL- corn. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C� q Signature o�ttlr or Authorized Representative Date Rev_10193 CITY OF RENTON CLAY � FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM �N.rO DATE: July 28, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for Maplewood Estates Environmental Impact Comments: 1. Fire mitigation fees are required at the rate of $488 per single family lot. This fee is payable prior to recording of the plat. Code Related Comments: 1: The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300-feet is required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500-feet and will require that lots 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they will require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per city street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, Southeast 132nd Street off of 148th Avenue Southeast shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-feet width each, not the 16-feet proposed. CT:ct mplwd City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP,ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Burnstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152nd Avenue SE, east of 148th Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control pans shall be in compliance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the down stream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional retention requirements for this project are as follows: 1. The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50%of the predeveloped 2-year, 24 -hour storm event through the 2-years storm event, with a safety factor of 10%in the detention volume. 2. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 10-year and 100-year storm event to the redeveloped rates for those vents, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. System development charges will be required for this project at$385/per lot. Waste Water: The development will be required to install a new 12" sewer main in Nile Ave. NE. (148th Ave SE) from NE 4th St (SE 128th St) to approximately 240' south of NE 4th. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. System development charges will be required for this project at $585/lot. This site is subject to (SAD) fees for the East Renton Interceptor and a late comer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. , --' 8- T -Yr Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date burn/069 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Water Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP, ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Burnstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152nd Avenue SE, east of 148`s Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Water: Water service will be provided by King County Water District#90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Fire Department Standards/Codes. "' 8— Y - 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Burn/069a City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP, ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Burnstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152nd Avenue SE, east of 148th Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments The project will be required to install both on-site and off-site Code related Street Improvements, not limited to curb, gutter, paving, sidewalk, driveway, road drainage for the street improvements and street lighting. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet with minimum of 32' wide pavement within the plat will be required. 8 v 9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Burn/069b si' =.� `. Z �� r. + '',--Lc' .•.0 . 1r1CaeK- . •'k - ins. ;"'4'°ter 4" ` . r `•�� =.W{� -,ti -��... - _ �-5..i _ - bw- ..* Y1.7a , ''.- —:."" ' .y7 _ -'W-v i-L . 3r.r "'•--� y�-- _ - _ - __ :_ - ._ _. ___°'fir - •'�'. "3i-- " -� . . s. -: ... _..-...'`-_3- _ — _ �. • (cY)• ,i/i - iis c : NV • .•� w C +.� �y..�,•.•.V!„r7tY"^��.,Y0aY.:ieM.Ow•��.�w.rt l 4s J. - T ) iV,_ PQ:RT_ATTa1V� tif,.`.T i O N FEE . Project Name /1(Op 16 tuc5o6? Es lc( Tc S Project Address 5/5 c. S E 12 21" St J>764,11 14 y f`',4,/ d /5 Z"`IA v Contact Person hove Huck 1«; ' Address Phone Number . (4 2 5 ) .4 5 Li - 1 R u 0 E X--/ 233 . Permit Number L U R - Q q - 0 6 q Project Description 2 12 /yr S retc//e ��trcrilc/ /A . . ... Land Use Type: , Method of Calculation: Pr Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation. P� �,vt: � sty 7 p.cpu,�e( bLj 7 1't 1 ri�c, 27 , ((c(� • Z 123 1,LeA,o cov :vur o{ai/y itii,3s • - -t 175 pe , I } '1p - � • 7 ) ( 2123) _ /5 f, 225, oC) • Gc Transportation Mitigation Fee: 15 c, 225. Calculated by: A) 1 .2t, Date: -1/26AT . Account Number: 10 5. 5Rq. 3180. 70. 00. Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:�liN C. Se-$A4tce,41 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 C/jy Or APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen RErtE.ON PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 JUL 2& LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE Bijj1 �N G JJ� SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singje family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south pad R-8. Primary access would be from 1488 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132n Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132n Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS Q�� fib v,L, _c7 �—�%, ��/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (✓��t�-.mot ---�� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates,LUA-99-069,PP Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced preliminary plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document did not change all references from "Longspur"to Maplewood(Estates?). The applicant may want to consider dedicating the north 42 feet of the west 30 feet of the NW quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., which is now included as a portion of NE 4th Street (SE 128th Street), to the City for street purposes to clear up potential title concerns. The Plat Certificate for the subject properties notes that there is no deed to King County for said portion of road and King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233 does not include said portion either. Information needed for final plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number(LUA-XX-XXX-FP) and the city's land record number(LND-10-0344) on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat is different from the preliminary plat, and is unknown as of this date. Make ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Neoteric. The geometry will be checked when the ties have been made. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\FILE.SYS\LND\I0\0344\RV990730.doc July 30, 1999 Page 2 Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per \VAC 332-130-100. Complete City of Renton Monument Cards, with reference points for right-of-way monuments. Note to whom new easements, if any, are to be granted (private or City-held). The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary review. The addresses will need to be noted on the drawing. Indicate what is set at the corners of the lots. Note if the adjoining properties are platted (give lot number and plat name)or unplatted. The property owner's signature needs to be notarized and the signature should be preceded with a certification and dedication block. Required City of Renton signatures includes the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Mayor and the City Clerk. An approval block for the city's Finance Director is also required. Note that if there are restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawing. and the associated document(s)are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) will be referenced on the plat in the appropriate locations. Comments for the Project Manager: Note the comment above concerning the dedication of the north 42 feet of the west 30 feet of the subject property(?). Pursue with the applicant as necessary. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this preliminary review is provided for your use and information. • PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIONS No. 99 - O3c, APPLICANT: )F'Rt,l ciEAfD CCLIc-311',I RECEIVED FROM cF 145TH A e-SE' (date) JOB ADDRESS:bn q g)_ (2 -fh , &r WO# 78,535 NATURE OF WORK: LND# IQ—c 4 4. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDivisibri BY LO G P AT, NEED iV O I ORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. ❑ PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 0 FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 142505-cIO X NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when -900b assigned by King County. -colt It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASThWATEI( .) 41 4oFbler. ZFF(2,0g3) 9q 1156.coti .,„/ Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER • 5-�- R rjoU IkflE $ 0002. :224.52.xuu1751- 218 481:445.3 • Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER 1IJ I r-t-t1=.. 1 11 froMES'1!` Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x ale SE1=44IC>= 72E Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park ) Vlb , gy V•66.rt DI sr.c Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x ' Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd . Single family residential$585/trait x t?.18 $ I2.7,530.0 a Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated O Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x g30.00 All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x • (not less than$385.00) p • I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ (.11J _) !C IO F31 /ct9 1-4 m Signatur f Reving Authority DATE w to H to ❑ *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. 0 ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to lY ►t .4 N- c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 o . City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: per, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 1 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 �` -\ s'e �g` iJ APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen r PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 T , ' ; ' LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152"d Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE P��h SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A Q SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singe family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south pwa R-8. Primary access would be from 148' Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More . Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare _ Plants Recreation 'o Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ri//VAX Oti M2-- 114) ,vN72'?,710 6 7 /22.\>`1---i B. PO CY-RELATED COMMENTS (2/4 ' -7 7,4_,,>_s_e_47_, / _, , ,, c6,2,,„:6_,/,_ -10t4 ii.u---(--7 ,7 -67.-7 7 ,') - ,7..,„; ,.../ , ci zIc-K__ io 7‘-/ i.7) ,/ �?/ � ,C 1 .6-6,P -/ 2'71-ec ' 7<--7No(y/v),,,,, , , i),_,4- -/riv/i-iA. -if6//,-) L:st ,, ky-pc-.)-.2.„cc-, {.0.6„ /leeX 7 , i ce/ e%? zf' ? ., 4 �, 7 c 1lr -1 - J /i J7 �� ." "r.- 2nlXvi,/ try C. CODE-RELATED COMMENT -' Az-eig 1-./-'6) C---(/72,S c---A.c). - ( `-7 k 67,(21-( 0') (17) *A-L,, :AC i C ,'7 -t1,(_ ' /6c,/--i Y-,%06,A)-( ?.,,I,N/ 7a/ ( , teY) Ce,a7 )-(__, /G07t- > 067 f av , W e have reviewed this application with p 'cular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needeJ3as,sessthisProPosal. / ) 5' 7/ / 7 Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date Prun'FR Rev.1G93 NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. ti _J .._. ._-. .- SCALE: 1' = 200' '-- --- -_ - E4 ;�• I , 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION L I' I r-- auE ADPPuc wr ,..R K-. fa�i�`0 I E A. ON RRS-MOGN K NR IWTE WI Well THE WEST HAL,a TK WER HALF a tre NORMS/ST QIARTCR a eECToN N. E1 "" IuwRUTON wOD° rDS/Aas-R00 a TOSISHT 23 TOR OK RANGES EAST,wLEIATETT!KROHN,KNG CORM. LONTALT.RCN wrrES 3 WA«INGTON Ewan TNAT PORTION THEREOF a TC mown,50000 RET L*W EAST �I • ,�II� a THE EAST ENE a TC LEST SO FEET a SAID«EDIa 15.AM Cr!!E A -- _-- -— -- - SEE SHEA C DIE NORM•••OaOim aPSAID CMS w'DAPO E>tiin TWAT rolRIw DEMO, PL NNER/€E SCEwBURVEYOR i 3 cc.- oa)RAVRe.Nc �`_ ■ CONavem N KNG CANT«RRIOR CCIR!COME NVwlR•N'A)FOR*OUTWEAR )f»-will A.2..Il.SUITE 100 $ a �,�' V-2 DARN STEER. S]L SOS -.,WN«INGTRI Stool { a•.e.a 1 ��, �, ��. y. 'm'MT ,•�L a CONTACT CRAI J.KREGER-Mover Y fL �,/ eq1 i ut I TIC EAST WL,a TI!NEST NK?a THE NORTNIE•T OLRTER a SECTION PI. IMEe G•yT o• i'1'i • Ott a Rt0S �' livi, -1 TNN«IT 2)NORTH RAM!E EAST.)RLIA ETT!I2RDIAN N KW COURT, KFVN J.V i'i c . /�1!!T-��A I�`�I�Aw—, N r~may IWSIRGTOI4 INCEPT THE EAST NALP a THE NORTHEAST OLYRTER a M NOITNIEST n SAMS l%K* r„I\Y\',,,A_ -- • :HIRTERENc.CF M NORIIYEIT QYRIIR MD DKEwT M!AST b R2T a SAp0 ! 71 ." \ nq\��_I _._ @1ION m ONVEYED T el lO KIM cowry-pR �.1,lIENl w ExCEPT»uT.�'�` SITE STATISTICS _dLl �- G—` ■,E7QI �►�� 'd� � t�" ___—.__DIVISION_I__ S[TOAOC« •Ix -••.v aw.w Iw-- ►ta rL �y ofea -ter. HMARKw"` )O��.._ �� .�I��tl`�`iE RA. ).w.v1.er.fal.Ts.•.At1EerJJ �S�A �_. �, ----- OECN see CRT a RMON•uaK+w NAw n••DATIn 11!• •NSL[FAIR l F'I•M)•)'GRAN•HEAL}.DloG N M MDSMIII , II ��~♦��` `��.'I/I�, STJ.wTN AH S[. 1A T144 DMSK)I I W% -�^.. ./,4,, R, ��`�_ i —`��'Ta PT*OD OR fIMIM METERS/ 71S TOTAL ASON 1 1 '\ `�` FR•2103•MCKIM ORRIS SURFACE DISC N M M.IL MN ST.. -- , . r•1,... • /S �• _� > , .� ,- SORT AYE SR lxloTN6 lO1•Y R••.NOW,or e!U]M h E/.YY�f' '_��,� `.��'�� Q� _-� EL SANS OR fw100 TEtEM) R-•-Sow.W ee UWnO of - -- - CIO. O/ �'i STREET.YLEA. ns!AC.IY.e.o GM �aeI�� 4,44 11 DF.L MACE. I•A r nS)+a NM 'w O Lii 14 • lia -- -1±..,- ii-a`.-../ 21M�/tff� - slow w' 1. --1'-'*-10 � `'- — _- ' `'�, -p, Q 4 6. tr -� i�ivir��s0✓��w�B'—as.--{. .%,,,, . i _;_;__-^_; `� i ¢ W yd � ` ♦„/�� MOON: 1�I'ili iI I 3 Z W tail N.y. . pp:. * t� fiesA:.1 -,_ SOUTH or SS-MO et • ) �. ti?:I I 4 % ..,. IV. .._" e illilN F--®�A _� �-II ,, .. C• .. • • D . 7:4-Li:: I • rTL3 • LIME TS um pr. w�.r RM .----__.-_�____ RENTON '•`. I _ - 'T--: Z 1 1 ... tr.._ LI L.1 4 il 21 -.4. SHEET INDEX !( — -- r lo n1 ; - J�-_I';••fr.,R- C W n 1 .- iw �c I�R I - Y:i yn,I-}4 . �. 'v i.; -'MEW SHEET OF I UV VICINITY MAP O NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ' 4 N F•WES. F•DOa. 94188T NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. r i pF a .` _ — $ .1_ i . a ti La y ---\ �_ - _ - - gin -` - -(- -Fr N»xg71 `- - a u1.n `� — — - 4). ,�— -n - i 1•--/-4-_ : p� ee sI !}fi. r -r-----. r----, \ Z"�'w� -$1 i N. I I I r \ '. 1 I 1 yQ • ; ''' • I r.r I 1 1 I i Y .I mw. 1 YI \ L____J L____1 s 1 • J l> f i• \ �. .1.11 I — a is , ZZi. 1 7 I. • i , • ii I IT 1 1 l , to r �: �� T J1i I 1 ar • Y I „ . I sr r. 1 I`. I 1 r i ' I 81w '8 f M , 1 j w 2 L i 2 VI I 1 4 I sap or. I , I ' - ;-J L 4i CO O z 1 1 ` h Q U Y o r. Y r `�I -I Lai 0 J Fe. Q N N7R!'la �+oon -• \� --w----' 11) i I Q y�$ • w �.t`` w I 1 • FF war I; 4' ;; = C 'A �' i i i l r 1 81 Y 1 tir 1 2 L J i, —i N Q O U` 1 . 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 L__1e J ! 1 I r 1 2 O d, I i .ar $1 5' a 5 w f • ! • S r--- � eaa"""' .. ••_,_r__� _ QRyy r1 1 .m.r I 1 ..1. e'Y / J L J ` ,r,.,...; ri me or sr Y I , •I ----- j I I r I 1 1 w W � 7 L---- I L- -�J I II 1 `t _ q Y r J —� 2 I i ,�.o..r. i r. I I y C cc yr _ i mr I Y L, J L \ m w • '� I 1 P --�� I -. _ I ; r .■ r , \; so u w Nee'16'06%) •. a•J1B. w \\1 rs , ... 1Y I-,._ II I1 -I I-- . Ir , 3 {N _- 1 ,� r I !' \ F. I or , i 1 -'--/1 I I I 1 1 I I 2 '�E ' s8 • \ 8 ` ` -., —' �i 1 s a 33 1 I ' / ^z 1 I = 2 Y 1' Y .1 « 1 w $ r, 1 I r 1 1 wr. $ 3 1 ■e , lirr"- --;'" ' / 1II1 .wr. 1 1 ( •.wa 1 rur. �J l, r. • / 1 # Y I 1 Y I 1• vr. I I aL r. i; ,.rr 1 J �� 1_ t . L l , ' I • I mod r.�J I r. `+1 1 `----� 1 ` 1 — .-"1 I ,-.1.. 1¢�� " . i--�'•� i R rt, s ; am sr �� L--�----' ` " L-�'.. ."��-_, ''y .e"' /T \ W L 1 f r I.sa»•"MR t i war. i Y� n i j ---\ Y i » (!J ' Y �i— ° — --i F `.wYcr1%., '' • 0 0 o i L I}; r__ys I warl 1 MALT. \ , .,sw r. `., 1 r 1 \:‘,:, ry SHEET Or I• I ■L--_-_J-I IL ---�J sesY 1 r-_-■�-_--J I r p _ y y` r\`� r \ 1 1. • + • r- WY&AIW!WM!.11o.•. /.. ---\ i.'- Y » 1 Y I\ I .wev ' Y i .rr `\I t !~ !. / ..rc. SEE!MEET 3 OF♦ sr r. 1 I 94fe8 NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. ` SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 :1 : •♦ 9 f . I I / • oo. 1 • 1 I J • ['. 1 I I r• 11 Oa I I •__� p q • ?� /. ____-A•''. F I 3 1• rw i 9 at 1 r.!i I`� _ - i , - :o • /I wa m.eeu.e•\ d • • ''' I �J 11 'wr. 1 1 ''- Zcs .�VnLG. 's 50' y j L / j Q — 1 •.. , F I �\� `L� w .�� __--_ �1 s II 1 -- ,. N 1 1It. • .L-__m - a / ', ! • • /-- — .a�.E1e.ae eueE•wTH \ -.• 3 I Trw I 1 ' re Y. I F I Tr `� r ,1 .I rwr. % -�'. /N ,,I / 1 Y. 3 -- ----1 1 _ ,Y-- I I; I I ; "'•'d cI \ 1 / (/ 1 • 1 TA r. L__ V. I 1 T•O Y. I r� \ • it i ,, / / vETLANDE ` 1 _ • R 1�ee m Z L__�___J r- - --_i __'J for Y_ _ , \III / / t , i II ...\ // aro ,_ Yb 1s . I\ \ inn or. ` --- 1 - ' `JI 1 �._� . :l1 - A I I I II • • il r n � �,•�� n + / I 1 11 I e 1 I / \ 8/, •Niiip',../ . ,. 4.,„\7\___- --..\(••,- \,,,i\...... ..:'‘.:\''..*P-*,,i. :., '''''''..;*1 ; ,r--,----4--_,—i....: ' .''--/:,()//,'/. . '! I/ no.Y. • I 1 ' ; ✓ ) /. Oa ArIOVOR 11411•1111 WIDTH�... `• ,do`e r.. , /'' . . / / <� wY. ,� 9 `I % 17 eOT \ ` / i/ 'r/ r / / y' � ` .ETLuw A ,. r , Zi '� I 1 1 ew r.'IIETLML}I ,,\� �—�/ • /^JS ,T / i ,,,... .. 1 1 * L_a—__J 1 / O/ /'�•. `♦ f , )TRACT• / / FI__�-( 2 ,I. 1 s /.�� ¢ i'I L� Y. / - -2 \ - - �� / / I lI:E. ET. Q ~ L ,k��l '� .r. 1 / r ► r+ ``�r -i i /. / / / p p ?(may/ le ., Y i 1 wr. / I /� _ / f y, r 1 1 i ,IlCI-% Nsr• 1 / - / Ir.oY.1 aY.i_ /� / /( I --.--H .,•r 1 < S Q • 1 S i •i •.e i/.. .,ram �/ ', •rrrrcY'•'" / -'ofWETLLATd1'D / i II 14 J o ' r. 1 1 co ' 1 % AREA 1 r- I I�• ' •• 14J `t 1y L-. ' e��'_� / .' 1 / / 1 /r -'ego ` I 1 ter. ' 2 1 4': " Q Q 7f / �y 1 I / - / / r- 1 r--�� r-- - L / / / / I 9,Ir �.I u, 1 -'--reo----I/ ; Q I'i 1 1 1 I I I , r---�--1 / 1 3'� 1 1w ' I I� wr I / / i / 1 1 I -.I • I s'y'1 1 \ / / I �S I'�r li i-�--1 -„1„... — al / / ' I 11 'I A I I oo 1 �_Irdy, 1 2 / / / .I ' I Iga9 I L--- 2 1 ' a I -R----' �.. l j j / I wY. rY.l 1 w.r I '�- / .® _ r , 2 -I Y. `_. _ 1 Iwa Y I: II , I L_i_J • I I I L-+rti_-. : I I �, e L1 _J I d I/ .__�.. 1 v-- `� n I -- /I `I Il i/t /' w v / S / p� i r\--r___T ,t .ri __�1 • I ¢3 q :::111; Iw ss ~ / /o•,R.'T�/ • 1�.EY LRY::R [ fir. i `�- / 8 / 2 ; D !1 .1, L 0061r. J I1@�ySj W ✓./ • y. r— ,- -i / / / i J 4 $ Iv1I1111 1 -_-1 I. ` 9 I! ,i T:r. ___ 4° '::. / 1 / 3 ----i >w I 3 J � y __i' I e.r� HH I/ ' /r .�-r-� ` I t /1 • . i'� m I O I 1 u J W E �` / ��_ I ' I 1 1 r-' 1— ` / ' . r. ` -- • I I 1,.o•r. 1 i9 n a o O i 'I —...•/ ,� I• q I emir I 1 1 1 I I 1 .,. / / I I `� 3 I L __J SHEET Or • .� �I Y �_.�..; 1' «-Y. I 4• ' 1..�.. T1• r 11 » 1 /� / /•') I w\`�`. i i I So p L---�I r12`� r 'S SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 Y I ~_ PROJECT w.wu ra4/ea / NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., HGE. 5 E., W.M. I,;1li /'�TLJIND GJ I. , I ID _ (• cETI - / �° `4� �" r`-- i --�,- -,, I ._t II 'I I i .^ 1 - I v 1 1 1, 1 1 I / / 2 ! ` r-_ l I `• ice ,l I :• J� .. R .MY. i 3 L-�-J i I ,.. j n 1 / i `•. I, -- 1 x L».r I » i k- i i•I" ! {yy�� .T ,�- '-J r�---'> 1b rlaR11MnYI /\ / ( .y I . / L_-_Ji 1 / , 1 •_ _ I 1 ,wv. 1 , err 1 1 1 lr� / `1\ I Y� I » 1 Q / s I / a 1 4"...."")'. w`i. I I >wncT[ C ' 1 1 L-ro-J » - » rJ -% .. . , \I, ...r., F .- - ---I ` TR.4' k wiw�� R f / I eY. - 1\\\.fir.-I I rJrL�l r----� r_�-� _ ,\• ` w` ♦`J IL` I I I n I L_ �-.) •�'. i 1 ^---1( ' \ Y 1 A 1 Q / ♦�.la; ``> .I\- �/ I ,I , ..«r. 2 • o \r»V , _ ` �V ��_'`` , es 1 r /_ ...___.` 1''' �..I' ' `` \ " • ,../, \ I / 4. / ` > `�♦- `R� `.. s` `� /' \ 2. \ ' YETdDI / . / ♦` - / `> / es° /,'' • WOO 6P. / r , ! `'♦ l • 1 1,1 =iqlial I I ' 7 \ \ - {/ MITIGATION / ; ♦ \• %/ R� / te O Z11'1 Mr. r \ \ ,.1 j YETLAIO A N v '' 44, / ♦ A ` � 4., •` / - ; 6 \//»»�..i < *;T / r. Lei_- / ` ``> ,►.w+r �, • I QP \Ir -L----� - / I ` I ` iJ. wj ` g ,i / \s ) Raft o �.ti ♦�i zr 11 .I % \ )R. in 1 I I. / /J J!- � v. I 1\ M l ��\ \ moor.) I . I 1 j, M` I I I'.• b 1.. >� !-. ( ' r. \\\ i'1--_. I nd\ \\ i -- `)f l F mv,n I / .1 5\ \ .., \ \e ,Ss�a. /.\ \ ` I , I I I \ , \• i I _ 1 w—� O) .r. �Z� 1 I / ,,fit\ \ IT ♦• ) C J „/ \, 1 _ • I 1 1 1 I U I I >. r" ` ``..1r. \ IA \.'\.wr, V ; w r�� I$ P \ Q U allirl J, I i,;�'r1 .I ....:.j,ti I /'�LLETL4D�I \ � h >.�� / . . .a.e r.) :``> b \ / l,r__J � � Q � ` { CO {� I I!. ..' a ) <'~' n>....„........\ ) „// i i i I'I.:. L... I i i I 1.1 • i �T.r 1' . : �, ? O . vt / I s I I T) �I O- �\ Ir 1, _ 1 I 1 J. 3 �tiy 1 \�,,)4,ogs `\ \\\ ,'dr' `♦ �� .Jl L_JtlC` I L--BJ L sV.� L v.l Asti V.I 1 r.l 1..ae r.l L .J ,•I� II wa. 1, \ t`,V• Q • • I• s • Y ▪ r r , r /' 1 �` \\..w v.,;, ) 1 :Z., �� , p 'I.: 11 I I 1 I I R r>--e-, CQ 1.• TIf.CTw _ \v,,% h` Ii.rn v. 1l Ir.IIMe r.11�oe.Y.'1 lnw r.I lam r. 1�p •1 Tl 1�. I !, ,Ss , ^ - -_ L- -J La-- 11----J L J I 1 I V I L al. ' I, r J I a°' I____ i I b ` '-✓M `1.> • - ,,ETLdp feTO FILLED - > f.T-"-_� I 1 . 1111 , _ .. ss,..,-, . ,,,, , , , , „ , , ,,- ---; ,,-- .--, r,---1..r•-•---1 r-.-\ r 2-.--1 r-"--1 r--- ---;l'''''''---"1.-=-; 1-----21,- t ,1 a -,t r 4 < / • I// I . .I I I •J, SPACE , 1 1 .! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J O ai `_ 2 \\ /, W ly a, 1'' MAf. M �� Id 11 11 I II I I I 1 it--. 'I• 1_.• !: .. s`Y a1 r. �o Y I 1 - $1 Ya I 1 I w 6 m - L L=!R 1 J aoa YL L_ I ..1 $ I a Ira $1 « , H w ,{1. t> 1 I R I JJ . _ _ 'm rl'(---'J _ L.°°°r ''''''...._1 sr I mr I w«r Iw.Y 4 »rr N' I' I N°p'M'Iyl n � J L1_ - OF SCALE 1« . 50• o a,,u '° „. :•<b ,: m ,�oenl et 4 4 rpT A q.moor �i -� �S U p�OTAMS _ .o aI1Q8 .� • li' . I f I ' 0 II 1 I r1 ?.�I ILr • ,_ , l.; II..,, iii __ �� _u .••••• _... .. • . , .....: • •• _, • •. ... : : ,I is • • , (ir: ',.. ' --- - - � - _, ' .0,-";;;- iii': 1 "' ' . —J II / .• • ......„)) •••• : , I I ,,..- A \.' :' \,___d .... '1 .. . i �� ... _ ; m r?r Ig C, -, r` r I . 1., -Id 4 .; ,air a , ,,______,, ,aturat iff_gragist . , .., .,;.' .-' , . .., _ r f , 1 Cin . , = ,:t, 1 /4/ #: , i 4. , .11 . , ' ',,,, flokt , $.11: - w ' w - • • I m'1 t e s — I .. • • r + a I jill j: i i ..- .„ .,0 I--• .4 . ._:44,./ c -... 2.— ,.,„,,,..„......z. .,1'.!.. I,. ,. Ir. -IT r-..-_____.: ... ...,... . ,A t :,.Am.. 414>. -, - , _... . .... ,- ' i , am-WI,.6,7' II I til.1ram• F/ + / p '.r,."'.. . ii.'. --,.- �/ .-- 1 f11-a'•;l.l-.i.‘Mn."%1.1 M1iIl.l _ f "s DATE ARK to TR TREE CUTTING/LAND CLEARING PLAN �-- "a°"' °" r m DESIGNED �.�nran MAPLEWOOD ESTATES �y .DRAWN LIM O APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCT/ON 101U'"An, L"'"•ZOO to 6 W qAC t MlClaw rilr.f-RSOM AK.N.E,SURE 101 El ^y M.n*Wm/IM t.MOOR PROJECT MANAGERd2WE,LE WV AWGICW RCN, ��•S �1� Far NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. l 1 SEE SI•IEET I OF 3 _ .7-11. 1, 14.0,0404P.11710.." lit 3.•MITER •r SCALE: 1. = 50• 1,-----4 ��i �, \� f 1 rR \"�• \ ' ed..._ TRACT•......... • \ r' ., . SO.MlR.yEp1/•!R ono.. .e f \ / 1 i ,I ill I IM ill.'' ! I I jill11 141111,4k IJjIIm! \, / i :. ........ .:.: 1 , aen.�e 1i •I I l� d $ . \ Ti. It '1 .". .., // 'b ►s j. 11 '_ ammo \ \: \ 'Vial*`/ . ;/ 1 �' / /4); I iii. / /j 1 1 I\ L / " , �w \ _ /r/ \ 1"3 , /� i r i II/ _, ri ' - 1 / 41/41)/w_____'' l i /e '4 j 1, r — :-...1,.-- . ',..7 Atli - , ..__-- ,, 40„,„ ,,. ._........s. _:;,;(.•.„ v ill �� a •p aw[wYorw 1 '� '� li '�' pr al 1,..•P, rif---. -_ .- ( ...._ / , "011,,... II // I..J.d I I t,� ;t:,�1 � sex imlee l ' y ,". ,R.c .t,...."...-: ‘' ( /I. /....../. ,. .p K.'"; :or / , •!..... ., 44° , „..../ � I / / --e R.a 2 m O 6 _— - II ..fir l 1111111 I s.'R... _- EH ; \iiiti'mur, Agoi.411110/te . ----SIIW7ftz'""rr, .i -- tt:c4:11) cig /., )401 .,�. fcl, R'ii I i � l k J //.-/- ,tifr a! 1% - , ' / i , _). `• 0, to 1__ I :' 03 . .://:-: 1.:II: .. —I-'1'.-:' 14 •C t I 11\I&_.__IIMIS ." 1 / i<1 11 1 1 i i BE.4. I 0I I.,i it R It i u 5 o Y �,' �/ j ., I I,l ,,�� I I Y , ,I o 11I I ' ✓... �, . 0I �_'�a y..y SHEET OF I .,_ I r f IT, .' 1 •` II ri- /1 ' I * I� i 1 r ,1. 3 :.t:�I r -i 1 " p (l .+1 > \ 1 1 k ! .'r 2 3 Y GEE SWEET 3 OF 3 •ROJEC,.•..ER' 94108 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 L� •• /..aEr��c/ p�� / ; r i /'• 4 i % w `y"�J� " l l' , . I�A ' r e. ° / t) I iiI ; R I r e e,„ ,. ,. 4/ 7. . 1 ! ix Illii tit_ __ _ t& t- . ill ,TI ,a _...--- 1 -I - / • .46 „I. V .3 j VI si e... ' ‘,,,, / /,. , ,.. M. -, , . 42 , / 0' ..--sr - If i 10 .0 ,,-'--. Mt -- ../ . 1 ib......,-1., . lik. '........\*:017- '..4.4,4- r..,•1 ' I',. , ‘. .. 1 Ak*,affirirs. /„...„*.,‘ \ fr - - ., , i ;I:-. ..., ., /1 11‘ ,„ li\t,1 ,1 . . ( &.:•4'). i A , .tkitt-v -,-, Ar4r/ /\ Iii 21 -- , t --- j. k. \ - v,-- — , • .. ....:..&_., „,.,,,/, mr(s _.. A - -,...;. -,-,,,..4 ..._:: _,_,rt 1 , 0 , -,• -,,,.} -"••• ' / e. •\\N•. :1—•#----). / 7 r • 4.I -4.'' --- N N' -.e / ._,71'4 f I t„ _ „I„,,,,,4::• , _ .,- , i _., - ' .% )1/4. • • '7 :, : i ilSi ii i •/N. / A'''' . ,/ , • . i I ..,,-,mit , 0.,:/. ../, '. . /._ .e , ill .�. / j. 0. ,�� V• ��'\ J .r — S ---- 't i .4. ) e I 1.41 % •.;. 'f'(.. \ 4....0 I/40•40/, / . . "A/ ‘\ * _ .....c c4) I.,4 , .. I ••f • /' \ : y �� I 211101 N , .--, e ' : lid' 1 '� \ R i , Lij ttr..,' .• 40_ im A- . 1._.. .. _,... .,...;..,1 ,. ..., , ....., „..,,1 . ,---- '\ ----\ i awl= INN ,• - ?) k cf) ,fir Alt ,r" ,f •'' .,I n }� W Q 44 Q • °`� , 04 'd �� d. e ` 1, / °,t .°�,1- �� • ATM.INVAIMISAISLISM• 3 . —� � s I N f y f ■ W • r ..a,. ma A ,a 1 .. a 4, .. I A u I °a ij . _ ..y _ ;. - . ...rl "J. I SHEET O� SCALE: 1' = 60' l mot!o'er et 3 94188 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. I OLLNEAPP SITE STATISTICS n: CANT D :l ION•NOM AYE NI.MITT)P AMA DMTIlm NI INMOTION ACM, !AMS)N�wMRnTW MOON N . I, CQITAC'T. APPRO NIAT3 IARTNIUMR 'CD- SM.,. 'NMICMG TA,m. PLN RiENGIPEEWd1RVETOR DODD-(SN Ave. . I DaGAVATKN MOOD CUBIC YAM.I T OItOINTI AK NG CONE]00 Ilk lldNc elI DTIQD MK TAROS (AT)NNI YYMN OTCN MOCK � CONTACT. 0 RACT.CRAIN J. *GG1Rq-NUN.R SI y IQV1P J.VAIOlI[fMOD(-5...+p. / 1W'+0 NTI ''x --_6a.arm at_. I -is EE a -� ba ..�w �) — — — SCALE: 1' = 200' � A 8 SEE SHE _• •- • I . vp. p f R/Y' i STRUCTURAL Iu ROPE FRIEND ROAD A7 y[� w�y,� + TO aft I DIN 1E S-3' I.' MGI DIMING 7 its II `+I'Fr^�!�J i MIMI IS ROAD Q'.NOFI[ MADE OI/EAMM 'M1 a S'_AY[M�• y J. NM NEW DESIGN OGLE . 31 N M10CM1r ROAD IB•1 :c..4�.F�(I1E1NG MOUNT 3 F •� - ; AREA D VP PROLIX A SWABS( SE 3'OO[NlNN]K/F AX1A R _ s.� '•N / .1 7� -® .,yJ♦\, WONT OON'MlE ANIMAL DUMBO GUTTER ••MICR C IS fa 41111 ) S.E 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS ix Wrs NO SCALE �' * 414AASOr a o-16 R i1 J� • BO• O // ' I �R •R R/Y SD"aNv ARFA pMYX GMT) R Y • M �/ S'vu: `i,i- I [i'P4l. �.tEs ' ' -7--0.3 �I_°'' I v, O l r J II - - • -mar QARNr RF IINCA(vA IENNI r COu�VEIE ` k (1..... �� f O �.E- RG�% A(R SWIM Of Ba SICET 10IT)CA(CURB!GUTIER i .I'"' 11 S - I MI PLAN) SFCNIV C-C - 1.. CO.,; .� s:, �� j, I S.E. 132ND STREET '0 V =,6 Sv ,/� �� O$ I NO SCALE O UY� ''Ia —' 0�s ®� a'e' j O O;, �o" ill ' ,. IBA IBA :3• ,.4 tritilfWi'-' ) 3o• h .J 11/ o Cil o e000emom- A DIM N, I- I CEDER,Gcmve)E Q WJN ICA[CURD R GUTIW •"DIMF TRENT LT f o� �. II: I ..... b SEC DON A-A ' • �AineAllimilaill-' 1R rr r' 148TH TO S.E.S.E. �� -- (SE. 128TH ST TO S 132ND ST.) il RO AT., F R/IFSS' IS' A.i II SS' * w 1Y • W D > Q— J I 3, I — as. I ..' D < rt __ mo aNr • CGV[C 91FNfK SIC NON B-B I CGIMOVEC NAIGL CUB B GVIICA o E 0 SNET DF TYPICAL ON—SITE ROAD SECT/ON 1 4 BD,r.,T Pa �J94188`� NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. • ~_, - —KV .- - _ - - -__-. 1.211.0 — eaaea.PangvrLT MOWS DM • 4, Y 1: � rwe�iwou ro �. .. a 'T. _ \ y i I. l �� it!' ac >. , _ ., i a •~ i1r, 'I I 1 rl� }[ Y 111 4 — /,� SCALE 1 w = 50' = 1II11LAewr ` lit o ilaliNli ril. 11111 7 -• • I I il 1 . ill o! i LEGEND t t1J inoi Cc 400n Z� a y 2ti� {I »\ lP \L:i...\,\ A _ g :�—4ap—Ofro.e.w Ttlw � IS I fQN �nV� ENl , '. . owl tl y J W � j ? II t x 110111 s. a m .r i 1 ., r 111111 i 8 i - �:. Ion.- ,: . , i,, ,, , .. _______.IIN 1110 Imir,---- -. ,_, 1 i 2 4 0 Li ��•,� 1 ``III i I I I, \V�.- ..,1—� �'`` I 3 [ �� 11 a it \ / SH/E�ET Of w.� wwoT� it a1 SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 PROJECTa 94188 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE 5.-+EET 2 OF 4 _____ . . r,...._ ...,._..._ ...„,,,,,,,.1; ft,-;-.,..-.; .1 4 M/' --— �' SCALE 1" = 50 :> .iiy.�' .� ��„�11 611 w N....._i mo\ I`` •r w • . e o w..t�e:ae dwew>orr2./ \I1 • \ v . \ N �) I I I ; - 1;115.1"! \ I z I n n ! /i I•, / LLETL4 m E 1 , / N Moe Fl �y j�1�1 , I RI N I �� I I ill ig 1 'r / I 1 1 1 E ,r MI �7 .> Leal III/i / \ . . pull • , -,-:\ ,:, / , IL' 1 I11 � � zl i I .�...:+-w1f1�• _ � _`• .\ ♦ � %! a �i 19i I ' I ' • ; / i11 li I� i ti0 I _ . . --tY 1,11.i'i //1/%, ,,, " , - " Vir°/// i I; : ! r, 4, ....„_ „../„,„....::. „......,, \‘,) .,..1%.,,,.a miss,...-... .z_.,...... ,...;_. -• Xdif . '‘. , _ p , i 4)4'•.,, 1., i i_ /,,._ . ,..:./ . / PO APPP1•0t PLII•111•WID111 .'/ \ ,iikir # • /..---- - - / . , ,4 /- /, ....._ . .• , i , 1 , \___.... -- . /li liff *Li-INMArr.. 1/ -r , 1 . .4.,-,,,,„ -7:14k.....,„ tk,k_ / Z ___-‹ MACS C ' i $ yr... '''''..--''" ir:-.III3---"'"*•lirr''-----------'''""'"'---t-a-l""?1-rr'".—IslmrTsts.--'a -.e.grAtr-"Kll•IM."Wglllkt'NkaW .,-•26...7-----,= I? cril--- le:5-a le ' , e, / i . '41 ......t.„:61.......--,-.-..• .- ..ze,..t.„----............,-.--,..........m.... ._tmer.- ----.-.1i.e.al. lir '- iiiiimi .1 .,; - 1,,,, cl : ,( //o ,... ,. ,„,,,,k- .1 , . ._. . • . , 10 k• { I .oil 1 tillir - F�.•/Noi .. , �- „, :,�/ I AI l l - ; a V /4/L.. .. 1 .' , I m Q . ,_ , • , , E • , 0 . ,../7 a ,- Is . : .. , :,,, . , - - i _ • I ;Ic 1 i \ / ( I�� / 44. y----1111Pili:441*.k / i u /, {II/ \ I I v> � i i .p.r.c,..21./ 1, r - ilie / i 1 / V P A ‘ 1 I. SP'. 1 1 " i'4 '11 ':*: 1 4: n ir' I' I. I111Y:, , , : .? I a M 1 _._- I I' .o I' 1 _ o (I i I I 1,;, SHEET or ,'(( .�'1 1 1 ` 3 4 v"o� SEE SWEET 4 OF 4 94.....ec" a�1es NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., AGE. 5 E., W.M. ie�� 5EE SHEET 3 OF 4 r3 •sue-�--''' i-- --; 1.-- -I :1.1 Z '� I �.�' - iI f e '� / \ I ` •1 Flo ♦ ;.I I tq 1),•-"-- _ ' 110 , 'n j ' 1 . .,- 1 ,. i".... , II IIF.M0 OK 1 , ' ,7 d !I- I u, lit { I / / >' a .. ... , ./ / III .. . i, . ;" ,. ,,, „. . 7_ �� t . , l 1 %., -M-.1111' '-' ,-1.22' - �...." . thL .. _ ,, , ,. -.0" °�a`I r 4/ ,D " � \ / f • • 11 MTA S � S .. I I �Ib 1� ., •... �1 uenaw♦ !AREA K - I ! Q\:e .. j :Fi. ` � � � j\ `` \ . / 4I' • �lM _ �. ; `-„ ii .‘, 4"/ t>7. •__ j11141 ; "Ill c.rt Als • 12 II » j_ Iklik i _ ... -...r4", ,, ...x. .,:._/, , It/ .if, .., z --- , - - ...,.... . . . .. , , . . ./ . * --. .- - -7; - - .. .. I-,,,' --, -- ---/-AI , , „,, y la I / '• PARK III / I, ' ' • 8 '11111k4V ‘..4iiir.,........1.. ....s__ tk i /.. ' L '. L'. MOIMMEI r/c A111. :I; S 4#040 '41..r % #.\.‘ !;: touT. I I I ' a y` iv by _• �i'. � _ :_ ... iI 8 t / . ' ,lre ° \ IN 44 ,,,_.... / I i - , li %. ,4‘ 4011}& Itak' 4 11111 IIIII ,,,,,_ __ samilmitiri .11/ . ..?.. lk co SPACE _ � ' W. ‘cti,11 ' t. - L-_____. -1r-... ..........,rrti. 4, \._ . ,r • SS 60 61 62 Z AA, MINENN _ 33 66 ._ - to,..mwn - - .y . — "", e o rrrrM■ _ .. o 0 0 < mr ow po N M'OO.1l1J - .. "- �La a SHEET OF wr..c v.nlm.R - O17A7 .�' '13f SCALE: 1" _ ".,.arnv ...... •�, wir mown IMMO .,...-- \-warms rm.. Jr tart ro ea camt, , s . 4 (o I 94168 E. ITT=— • I • • ,-'� / .•% /// Noowasz Y0/2 J' 7._..............___.. ..../......'—....'" a M Z 1 ta •� T > j .4. S • • II MV 47 I'WM 06W UV l illa (m :� I, I __ w / s rMR w•, fr.fort, ,� i• 1 a Aro.r.w P.w 7.....,a.n.. Riar':r ` i !i t7i7 _ r ... Iz 7 ./. :0. illiiiii•i.11 I , '' - ts . • .... 0. .,:e .... ....$ $ .:. ...; ...,... , .., . rrisj /0, .,,v5v.................7/... —'1 4•---•-""----------------'/------.S.' ,.' < :71#''' • ! ___ .77::,........;w72 Irma i I •� _ \.•L' I- I I L �. ' X Sl 1 9 Si '.., ... k ___;—.A. 0 — I ! i m DATE APAR./999 TOPOGRAPHY MAP • i�; r m DESIGNED ¢, ax R MAPLEWOOO °"°""° ' ': °j 1 .DRAWN Tl AEAONL r APPROVED Planning .HIl fAlM An.ME Sun... i 1 m COBURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION Engineering Bw�..,Washingtonoaoo/ �:; �• W LNAN.1 AALCQR /ISIJ-1101M ALE ME,SN/F I01 Surveying (1M 815-1ln(Ia)•li1P0.1 Fax 2 PROJECT MANAGER BEu[H,E rA3l4A'GRR]M 98005 _ ... ..... .. I I 7, 3. ' I •ea te V WOW,WS Mee-.-•.'"-.--.•', A.egl Wee r 1, 1 ''- !aP 111-A-_e.*L ____ - ;,.1.7.i.--- • 7.- - --_,-.• . .. —SI al ''S ----- --------- -------------- WI.. ' FY Wi-- QS -... 0 -;•.‘ ----"' s's/ "... ........-----% 'a ,..., Ci ,-„„ . . ,....... \,..,,,,,_.. ..,,,,......,.., .-t'S.7.7...... \ \ .... ...., - ...- -. --- ,.. •:. ...:1......4/71 . ,,,'.- 01,\-,,, -... 7,z,,,,-; . .. ___*, % • I a, • \ 'i''''...:'•--' :.. i'•-''',,-..:', :'-::'. *. •.• • •••• +-,...: % „; •es 1 . ....A.1 s., ( 1::13.4Ag'•-•').• .: ---eli: -,.--,-4,...t... •' • •-• • ? .• .t• ' ''. _, 1 1 a •---%.;-'-;;;;;;:i-.V:14-1.\A!.4, ' r„-- , . **. \ -% •% -- ••• .,, .,..,- ,-C:4‘ W.,, 'ft •., ',a ..,'.1• • 9 $ •M• TVEVN:4-s • ••••• ••••. •••,. •.., \:41i.".'::--,;,, i ,.., ..,)•::.. . \ •...... .• ••••N I •••••,,, / ••••t1/4 Oh N 040410 1E7't•2 2 I ‘;> s - •\ •• . • .. / • % ••(t4er-,-,.-. I• 0U _wo>rceC7,iI .--- us -• /- gLsoill I II . ••• )1/4 . i, .... . . vv. ii§ . G PW .. ...,. r oms to ...., 'ft \Fie. i .. 4 ...-.4L _ _o_____ _ _ --..— — *. •••. 1111%—f •\ ".. .. .., .7 •.... --I 'ft ... . ..t.• ... • . I • .., ..4 ... • .... ry :// •z.. *4 ••• .... •.• ••••. I\,) 41 .., .• 1 ••4 / CO 6.4 • 4 ,,.. • •-• ..... ... rf .. '1/4 ' t•4 ••• 0•••• 0. •'' . .. r\_.................L._k, 4'9 .9 ff. ..• . . s jf... . iial .4...::: 1.,..„. 414;;\ 1 % S • \ .Z.---:j:...Cr___ CYI ...... ...• . 9 ..,,, ------.C‘ S „...*4 • RP .:*.,..:.% ... NT. •9 •\...... , 9 S., ... .... . . , I : .. ---------/--3. : . ,..7: ,..5 . •. , ...... ., ... z \ _ • • ---N____________/ ...v,• . \ N • •••• ... i ".. • .. %a ••• *is.,...S 40 •• •••., \ , ..• C>.... .,•. • '. .0. ° •., \ , . ..••• ••• ‘ \ , ••• • 1., \ , • •••... ' •,.. 1•• ••, . '4. .W-------- •••••:1. ...* ••S :: • ,,.0 .• ie, .4•%•%•••• t, • ''. 7.0 , • ' % , . \ • \ - - •,• ••• • :41_14f .4 2 /\_____. •"t_--------\::_/' e.... .4 ••• ."' ... '.. . ,le • ''''‘. ..... 1.. 4f-i• - • ' _ N., • --..,• . •' JE ,y • so ...,... — --_-....r.-.1.M." 01.-- — __„„,—,,, •••• • •••‘----N------•Ni.- --•• M;6\________-774r614211WIEMIRIMINIVEcil. '••• •••• •'', — 101.1 --difiiMIKAIIIIIIiiifl Lii.•-•;Iiiiiir ..— ; .77: V`•“"` 1 471 Om,a t.els re zi if ea•-MIDTP 1 ••aLl Woe,' We.Ser / 1.-\ REN50•5 0.c . .,DATE YAK 1999 TOPOGRAPHY MAP 911/7„M•Nii MOPED C.1 MWEGV? c000sEMOIII S.INC I 4 3 2 MAPLEWOOD . . 1 ...• .DRAWN LAW .6•1 APPROVED BURNS TEAD CONSTRUCTION Planning A205 148th Ate N E Suite- v...., coi co q OPAIC.1 10fUEGO1 11215-WIN ALE ME,soot 201 Engineering Surveying Bo.wit,Washington 91007 sp.!..,••,/ (415)SS,-7877 OM 8857913 Far . °•.‘LOW PROJECT MANAGER BELLE-WE WASIVNGAW 90005 '-- .....0 w 4 ... I . I\N • • -• - 11 I .t tow-, --•••. •-• ...-..........N, \\I -11 - C---- ---''"\-- -.--' —6.- -41, __ ---me•w\...- ,,... '-. : ---O,T — L. \ .1. '1/4 s•r• ','t...;s'' ,71'.X,. . .4.9 ... .1/4 '''•:1/4 '1/4 ' \'M`,...• ) r • • ., •..q.., •,,, ,,..:...1-0,4 . . ...„., .... ... •. ......,,,,,, .... ... .... • ••.... .:- a I ••:,-. . "",...:. '-,40$4 ,-,,.:,•;,,A.,, -*4 .. ... ... . * 1..647,* ..:6,0..I ...4 •.4 72 / •..... ...„ IS \ z. 1 . ...,".., '‘ .... . , :0% •,.. •Ncl. ..4 .... ,t,.. N. . ... \ '.. '... ,1/4-----"s-----2 • -... 41itii61, ,. . '.1..9 ... .... • '-.. .: *-1'.' ';.....7• '14-*" ..,,,,,,*1!‘et, \ ; . _ ''.--,..... ... 1/4 ..4 • .4 .4. ..• t.a. •*4 ,..'t 1‘... ..4 1 1. *4 \ q*.• f ,,,.1.4....* % N• •*. • .s. ft, .4 '1/4 ',-• 1/4 ' I .:..,.;., .,,. I .1/4 • '•• . :•••••a a• • gI '..., ,ok. . .1A,..., •••• .1.- r..... ,:-... • .... ,... , , ... :.. ,, . • ........., ., {------ ,,i.. ..?.• .• i *..;::' :t••.•,, *4::. ...• ••••• • \ ..i 1. , •,,e, 4 . ..4 ..4 .P.• ._j 1 •..•::: 1-1.:•''' .• ••, 4r,,te, 41:1:4 ‘f ' g 11• ...,.*.• ... ...4 „ ... „,.. .,..,... ... • .. . 6, , • ..• :„........... .... ....• ,. .„.....,,, . , • ..4 .0 . k''''?. o'.':;;44- % $ -6:!;,.14-!-Z0 I \ 4%* :::4 'A.* • • • ..•i „49--44544„ ..4 %A 75---' ..• • ..• ... .4 r •$q.0 • ••• • • %A, ......... * •• *.. t.', A .,..-'••* ;: ;:i, ..4•4 .." i .`'' %.• ' ' •' (rii to \ :1..1 .''''•- . .4. . • ... ... .....4 %. .... ... ...,. . ..k,.':4;,.5" % ..,,. .-- '4.**30' • T c.,) m - m rn ..\ ..'s .ks. ,,,-. v-11.,,,,,-,...0-,,., •••• .... ,1/4\'s •.:. k A 6' 'N%'INIt4. q .. .. . ----:....... ..' %. i 90 ...,.....,,,,,,.:,_ .. . - -......,____v •••: 's..4 p fi\---' -.. ...... ... .. .... --, 1 .. . .... i ••• *II . L f . ....„..*. :,.: .( ._ •• ' ••• 1 .%* • '.• \ '.. •.. t \ '.--: ::. . t.3) 1 • ••••• ••• • -,.....%.... -:.•,.—r, , 1 t il••s• . . • **.• ••• .;. ..7,,N. 4, 4.... .,. 4 .4 \ . I 'a I 4:1•••4 .. *., '1/4 • % "N ‘.. ...7 )1 1 ..1/4 ...,... ro .... ih4...... .s. •• ()I ••••• tt...'1/4........... $ •...„ •,„‘. ,s ',....._ ____••, -- rn ( If C .1' \ % ••••• $ • I •*" \ '.... -• .c, ',.. . • ,.‘• • 2'..... .... f:-.___/------/ .. : ,••° %. ••• . • • 1 % . t *....‘ , •,-.. 4:.‘...., .. ...c., .... ,.. . • . .. , .... j_______,,,..„: .1. •••,.. %.*.... .,..• . \ y.--•••• 1 s.. %, ••• th. .. .. V ,• .•.•:: • ..' .. .,...... \•.: .*. .• ...t. ... !. h. .• j I.,. ''' _• L '.., '(!kz, "..... ;',.• .••'•• .1.. ••• • •;• e ..:, . 4 ... . -:) •.% •-ks .*,\ e •-•...-.. ., ,...., .,• • •• .•':•4 ../ :4.7 t.: .., • ? • .'*-$ f'N •-• , t 1 •4%..i•,..., •.• ,,, •• . .. r ..__ ... - N. • ..., ------- : i•,-: I • • \ -.. , . . .. •.• ' .. • *. ..,. • ,. . . • ... r.,_ _ )1.'' P 2 . . %.*** . ' t: •. • • • . ., ., '4 ..11 _ ___,___'? ,r ,,, AVE1MMAA i fr. r / ,040 141,1= Mi eal• •IrOI WO/ me tli• ••••••1 temp.nt tt......... 1 I•lel WOO I ] .DATE MAX 1909 TOPOGRAPHY MAP 0, REV.045 2 Co !,DESIGNED C4 KREGER mrnm,..b.":"..1.., '3:12 MAPLEWOOD Dooas E vs,codaCEI 4.. .DRAWN LAM i' je at, i -eb APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION Planning , 4205 1,14111 Am/I E.Sulf•2.00 ; ....0.••••ii co s Co .9, owe 1 ARCIECD? 11113-1101N AK".WE..MAX 101 Enpinoarir, B.A.,..,Washington 4.0,07 l' 14i,;•,,t,.,• • SurvoyIng W5)8854877(425)•85-79•3 F. i PROJECT MANAGER 01TILE40E,IIM044V71011 90005 1N1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: 09/17/99 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Jana Hanson,Zoning Administrator G r:� SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates—Waiver of Minimum Density The applicant, Bumstead Development, is requesting a waiver from the minimum density requirement in the R-8zone. The Zoning Code imposes a minimum density in the R-8 zone of 5 dwelling units per acre for single family development. Reductions in this standard are permitted when the applicant can clearly demonstrate that due to environmental, physical or access constraints, minimum densities cannot be achieved. Significant areas of wetlands, approximately 2.03 acres, encumber the subject site. While the areas of wetlands is subtracted for purposes of calculating density,there is a substantial area of required wetland buffer(50—foot minimum wetland buffer width required for Category 2 wetlands) that is not included in lot areas but is counted toward density. The inclusion of the wetland buffer area reduces the density below the minimum of 5 dwelling units per acre. Based on this scenario, it is evident that environmental and physical constraints exist on the subject property,preventing the applicant from achieving the prescribed minimum density of 5 dwelling units per acre. Under section 4-2-110D.l.c, I find that the subject project meets the criteria for reducing the minimum density,therefore it is appropriate to waive the minimum density requirement and permit a minimum density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. fi cc: Gregg Zimmerman Jennifer Henning C:\My Documents\burnstead.doc\cor • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING;DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING; On the ?h'd day of Sept�etM.tcr' , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United. States, a sealed envelope containing evc. d ete vwAtrto-itc'hi documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) S.vr .td. K• . cn-erre+— • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �,�_. �; , 7c - c signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thduses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' Dated: / ( C C • _ / Notary Public in �nd for the State of Washin tph MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) IIAARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointment ex1.Ws PPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES ,)UNE 29 2003 Ma f.le.w ood Esterte S P. P. Project Number: Lupt, qq , o(oq, PP', V, ELl NOTARY.DOC I" i �1/ ) r CITY �F RENTON 1 l - 'ki.47 . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • September 2, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on August 31, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148th Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 s' ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. Location: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee,0P er Rosen ,4?".r&\ 62L--,___e_.,,,_ Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy Document7\ 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 gip; CITY U,k' RENTON C� NAL Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 2, 1999 Mr. Ron Hughes, P.E. Burnstead Construction Company 1215— 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-99-069,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Hughes: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they hay( completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on August 31, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999 Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rentor 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Cod. Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk' Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on th+ seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on September 28, 1999, at 9:00 AM to conside the proposed Preliminary Plat and Variance. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be preser at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environments; Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise you appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee,(pc„.6,Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: C. Donnelly, R. Noreen, T. LeMay, H. Reynolds, D. Stanley, R. Pinkley, J. Tarantola, S. Nipert, E. Duff, S. Day Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 I l CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. 2. The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3. The applicant shall work with Water District#90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The applicant's share of the signal cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primpry access would be from 148t Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152"d Avenue SE. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Observe recommendations of the geotechnical report. FIRE 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300 feet are required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500 feet and will require that Lots 33 through 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per City street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, SE 132"d Street off of 148th Avenue SE shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-foot width each, not the 16 feet proposed. PLAN REVIEW SEWER 1. The development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE) from SE 128th St. (NE 4thSt.) to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4th St. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 2. System Development Charges of $585 per single family house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. 3. A special assessment for the East Renton Interceptor shall be required and a latecomer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. WATER 1. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Renton Fire Department Standards/Codes. DRAINAGE 1. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the downstream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements are required for the project as a SEPA mitigation measure. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. System Development Charges of$385 per building lot will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The project will require full street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving, street drainage, street lights and undergrounding of overhead utility lines. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet,with a minimum of 32-feet wide pavement within the plat required. GENERAL All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. POLICE Once developed, there would be approximately 161.32 calls for service (CFS) annually to this development. PARKS 2. Recommend trail connection through site to proposed County Regional Trail system through County-owned Colasurdo property designated for future park development by City of Renton and annexed into the City. May want to consider a notification on the face of the plat that adjacent park property is potentially programmed for active park development. 3. A bicycle lane has been identified on NE 4th Street in the City's Trails and Master Plan. Street improvements should include a 5-foot wide bike lane. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 13 4. The applicant shall widen the access easements serving Lots 121 through 126, Lots 115 through 120, !. Lots 133 through 138, Lots 105 through 109, and Lots 139 through 144, all located in the R-8 zone,to a 26 foot easement width in order to meet private street standards. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall record an access easement and maintenance agreement for each of the lots that gain access from the private streets. The easement and agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall record an agreement for use and maintenance of the common storm water facility. The agreement shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall create a homeowners association to be responsible for maintaining the common open space areas on the site. 8. The applicant shall pay a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District equal to$2,797 per residence,for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that are also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. It is possible that rooftop water might be needed to recharge the wetlands, and this should be investigated as it is generally cleaner than surface flows from driveways or roadways. 10. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each stub street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 11. The applicant shall erect signs that shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 12. The applicant shall erect fences between private lots and adjoining wetlands. The Variances are approved subject to the approval of the Preliminary Plat and the conditions applied to 1 the plat. ORDERED THIS 26th day of October, 1999. FRED J.KAUFMA HEARING EXAM Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 14 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1999 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Craig Krueger Vince Geglia 1055 S Grady Way 4205 148th Avenue NE, #200 2101 112th Ave NE, #110 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98007 Bellevue, WA 98004 Garet Munger Shirley Day Jim McDougal 12525 Willows Road, #101 14412 167th Place SE 14502 167th Place SE Kirkland, Washington 98034 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Laurie Tarentola Elizabeth Duff Sally Nipert 14606 SE 136th 15300 SE 133rd Court 14004 156th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Neil Watts Ron Hughes Claudia Donnelly 1055 S Grady Way Burnstead Construction 10415 147th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 1215 120th Avenue NE,#201 Renton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98005 Teresa LeMay Ron Noreen Mrs. Harold Reynolds 1203 114th Ave SE P.O. Box 1554 13016 156th Ave SE Bellevue,WA 98004 Auburn, WA 98071 Renton, WA 98059 David Stanley Roger Pinkley 64 Rainier Ave S, Suite F 15130 SE 141st P1 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1999 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, PlanBldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Econ. Dev. Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,November 9, 1999. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 12 lot sizes due to the mix of R-5 and R-8 zoning that applies to the site. The applicant will have to revise those lots which staff noted did not meet lot width or pipestem or access regulations of the City. 20. The plat will be providing mitigation not only for its traffic impacts but its impacts on the Fire Department and the parks of the City as well as its impacts on the Issaquah School system. This is the first plat covered by the City's endorsement of mitigating impacts on a school system. 21. The interior street system appears to provide a reasonable extension of the City's grid street system while protecting the wetlands. Those lots accessed by private access roadways do have reduced usable yard and open space on lots served by these systems. The City Council might want to review this situation since in some cases yards, particularly front yards, are substantially reduced leaving not much more than a paved driveway or turnaround serving as the front yard. 22. The development is in an area which has appropriate services available. It will increase the tax base of the City and as noted provides a reasonable selection of lot sizes for those who want larger or smaller single family parcels. 23. The plat does a reasonable job of protecting the wetlands while providing needed access. 24. There will be stub streets that will eventually create through links to other areas. The applicant shall erect clearly visible signs at each such street informing potential purchasers that additional through traffic will be accommodated on these stub streets. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. 25. The plat shall contain language clearly defining the limitations on access to the wetlands that border the new single family homes. Similarly, signs shall inform residents of the protected adjoining wetlands and prohibit dumping of any materials including grass, leaves or other similar materials. These signs shall be subject to review and approval of the City. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the ERC threshold determination prior to recording of the subdivision. 2. Lots 7, 17, 40,49 and 70 in the R-8 zones area of the site do not comply with the minimum lot width standard of the R-8 zone. The applicant shall revise plans to meet the minimum lot width standard. Revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording the subdivision. 3. Lots 55 and 56 in the R-8 zoned part of the site and Lots 9 and 10 in the R-5 zones area are adjacent pipestem lots. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on these lots to require a shared access driveway and to require common maintenance of the driveway. The restrictive covenant shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording and the covenant shall be recorded concurrent with recording of the plat. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Nat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 11 The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 10. Development of a reasonable road system will require some intrusion into the stream corridor and its vegetative edges. The same linear wetlands discussed in the wetland buffer variance create the same hardship that justify a variance from the clearing regulations. Streams run through the linear wetlands and trees and shrubs located in these areas will be disturbed if a road system is to be constructed that allows reasonable use of the subject site. 11. The applicant is preserving large areas of the site in natural open space including a park,wetlands and wetland buffers. The removal of vegetation in the road crossing areas will not harm either the general public or other properties in the vicinity. Again,the applicant is providing additional storm water storage capacity so that the loss of the water storage or holding capacity of the vegetation should not adversely affect surrounding areas. 12. The removal of vegetation to allow roadway development to serve development and emergency services has been permitted in other situations where reasonable development would have been otherwise hampered. Approval will not grant the applicant a special privilege. 13. The corridors chosen for the roads are generally confined to the narrowest crossings and to the minimum number needed to provide access to this large parcel. 14. If the City is to accommodate a reasonable population,development of more sensitive sites will require some tradeoffs. In this case,the applicant will be providing approximately 15 acres,or a little less than 25 percent of the total site area,as wetlands,buffers and other open space. The applicant has also attempted to design these roads to cross the wetlands at their narrowest dimensions minimizing as best as possible the intrusions. Both variances appear reasonable. Preliminary Plat 15. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat provides a wide range of lot sizes to cater to a variety of single family interests. The plat preserves the larger wetlands,creates buffers and provides additional open space. Approximately 25 percent of the site will be open space. 16. The site can be served by water and sewer service. The site will provide storm water control and wetland recharge. The site is located in a sensitive drainage basin and the plat accommodates this by preserving the larger wetlands and creating appropriately sized holding facilities. The development should not exacerbate existing conditions,although it will not necessarily solve any existing problems. 17. The site will mitigate to some extent the additional traffic by providing an appropriate signal and pay mitigation fees to cover other improvements to the transportation system. That is not to say that the additional approximately 2,000 trips will not create perceptible impacts in the area. 18. Similarly,the development of over 200 homes will change a quiet area into one of suburban housing and its attendant increases in population and light and sounds. 19. The subdivision does not exactly meet the density envisioned by the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan,but some compromises from those standards were generally unavoidable due to the large amount of wetlands on the site and the buffers required around those wetlands. The site provides a good mix of Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Co. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-99-069,PP,V October 26, 1999 Page 15 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. . _ . ... — CITY Q RENTOI I - - SCALE: 1R = 200' o€ _. i -• _.. • _.. -- I _ aD- 4 7. I , r_ _ L _. • - 1. �_ ! � ..•.TX.L..____. —__-. ( —' . 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �__I l ��,-��, • I au•EwAPPLIc wT �. I. V� rMC41r Gu•!i[-D LO .....c I a^ O••M O•.OOIN AK NC.NM]d w y • �) ' I M MIT NY,Q M WIT..•.l Q M NO.T•r DT GYRRI.O MGT.. IbO i0N Y00• ]{ii ,�I.��+ I TO.X•.•r m,N P.rari lRINGSTOW•Cr..0. ...e.erCr C Kr..M000 IC.CO... OprIAOT.wr,!.•n.c• # • W WrTW I.GIR 1WT WRTKN MR[O Q M NORIM.PDOD IC[T LTM fYT • A t Q M[YT LN O M.CDT M PEST Q•Ao•. 0.NXO.•AND S.C.T.. •1 --•—. !j•E .�ll-IE �' p Mr..T.eIQQ Lrwo uTw M wT]»co MET Q M I. ..a•eo rrr.o PLMf�RJEN iEZEWd1RVETOR ,1 .S ■` RL I M NOM.YDPD MT Q Y9..... .ON A.ex..Out mgr..MrIQ DODO•PKIG•elM.NG \ r N A 1�` IJI ,..6... D•GC.00••eD X RM GGwrr•u11•Dw ca.Rr cre!Xreo••H]s)Iql•QIMYT •[LLr.4C••XWTON!•DDT I:1.� !.]•••N.YT C WM rA•TOrL 0. CORAOT.O.Ar1 J.Iq•lOCR........ fig • o ® JYT•4 CIDM-G g 0 p\I�� I THE EMT..i,NaDx R.��r.eHT 4IX l YKttr 1.101.4.1.T •RDi N KW KGQMT.K AW OtLYf]O..wn p. CM*01 RNTGN .r �•� ,,, WI �, I .avX A v i _-1_— t+ m`'bi� N MY•D•11 .-I._ D•••.•rTOK CYCir1 M!YT W(}O M NORI.CYT O.MIr..O M NOrtt.YC•T T �� 7• F' 1 -. -- -._�_. 1 OW.rID.O M NO.D.YC•T num.,As.rm..If M CYT b RR 0.). •S�, \`1►�\►�10ww-isa— 1.41.1.•CC..,Trc TO K.GGURT PM Pc.)A.n.Gr1.r nut MP.. SITE STATISTICS = ;�yp 'iordel„ w C0.011.140 61.10 SCOOT DIllAPI GDR!Grill!arr..&NM IwP(I..• _ ` . \ Nol¢t>a aE ar. EsENGHMARK g\�►ao\� qyI T6407.1. .,E. ;,�3,..r...>,w..aX •\\`�. 1 1__.—_-___.. _ hill XMK•rR CRT Q Ie1TP.WRIT Q.IMW IW&WWIrICrOYD YII. MrLr rMtT Wtr77, �^ , ` ..! S�` w Oeu.. �►t R�•�` �0.�'/ �� •rJ.wTN AN•r. KAQ LOi► t440•�'�.1 ,1 .. . `K4� IK••lT OXl11NX rtTW].., 111:rr �♦`S��_ \,�,�*�� 1. MVOS••R�.CRA•••I•rAC!D•C.X M M.•L!•TN•T.• ]r TOf.1L �� _) 1 `. L EL NL••On lrTOD T1<tW] !%rTlO WOG) R.•••wN.-•l D?./K �p �• •1160 AIL WI AC.lrJI.O MU 4 _. ._ :oao,,lr sns��t , .4.� _ co 0 _- 0/ �/Oj��/ �'T w ,.. n Drc.•'AC4 IPA AG ruF•w WV \' ene ASV/ �d4 JOI �� . I I T -z rr � - W �k_'_ __• �i �.. T?L��vi,, ��I� �f��• t�• L='^C^:'1'.�.rl i^1_.=_ .1•ly�._ —� I o� iaM C. 11w6 R. �K, •Y ?�;'•_7: y - — - ¢ W ((04 I• i o0 =.°.�.. - toff44,71.77114k7 !4 �$1,J11/ s' /0ill _. :L��__ ram' Fil " 16r z o o IS�� I.` �h� �� -.__--`:_-.." e°!r�_._. ,- 43-j Ili ^#*+ ET4 � I .� �s f 11' -- _DIVISION.2_.. t � "II i I y .'t4 t~i5: ..E'''.::',-c:r:—.:;__,-::.1.. 11: 1111'. -,'''.::;71.1.g-1:1"-I. cs . 7%.it.L.I:i:::-.ialt..::;:.:*:,f.,;;.: * w•.. ,-u.emu_-_-- - RENTON �• �,y'• .I ', i ZL_ ... Z 3 71 CRY LFtT6 .� wXN n. J•r'+(I jyy- '�' i MtO L1 _ $ F T u r •e.•T J i R... 4 .RT IL•1 : s�prot SFIEET INDEX -- r N `..rr'�.IA •:.. Tn7,' !._� a I n ._� 1:144:1 yJ. igig,* '".z�• SNCCT Or N® VICINITY MAP lcNEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP r•M.o. r.. , .woJre•.w755 EXHIBIT A MAPLEWOOD Legal Description PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. •. CIT OF RENTON W` s _ %110 Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman November 30, 1999 Mr. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT FILE No. LUA-99-069,PP Dear Mr. Hughes: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval from the City Clerk, and will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 04.,141 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen Sandi Seeger, Development Services 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1999 TO: Marilyn Moses FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat,LUA-99-069, PP Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the legal description for the above referenced preliminary plat and find it to be satisfactory. it \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\FILE.SYS\LND\10\0344\RV991118.DOC EXHIBIT A MAPLEWOOD Legal Description PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. I I • CITY OF RENTON NELL HEARING EXAMINER MEMORANDUM Date: November 15, 1999 To: Sonja Fesser From: Marilyn Moses" RECEIVED Re: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat NOV 1999 LUA99-069,PP,V CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS Would you please verify that the attached legal is correct before we send it on to City Council for approval. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 26th day of October ,1999, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s)containing a decision or recommendation with re aid, addressed to theparties of record in the below entitled application or postage prepaid, pP petition. Signature: -1/ 1 1 6+ -)4/(Ccic,.0 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of lam\ • , 1999. 46/MAA0k 140dir*(04 4.0A rAl Notary Public ' and for the State of Washingto'ir. 0110,7 residing at ,therein. C1 °i 'b'1 Ca t` i Ip 4 Application, Petition, or Case No.: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat •(` r 4 LUA99-069,PP,V The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family 11 residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132" Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132"d Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street,(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148t Avenue SE and 152" Avenue SE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works P Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: September 6, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: August 31, 1999 SIGNATURES: 4/ '/?� re �Zim rman, iministrator DATE Departme of PI nin /Buildin /Public Works \ ) P 9 9 Ji\ e"------ A,/‘it-,/, ' rii(Zic? m Shepherd, AdmifSistrator DA ' Cbmmunity Services ( ,, 4ii7 tom '313l7 7 7 Lee heeler, Fire dhief DATE Renton Fire Department 'f dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. 2. The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3. The applicant shall work with Water District #90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 8. The applicant shall pay a School Mitigation Fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District, in the amount of$2,797 per lot, for all proposed lots located within the District boundary. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148 Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132 Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132" Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152"d Avenue SE. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Observe recommendations of the geotechnical report. FIRE 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300 feet are required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500 feet and will require that Lots 33 through 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per City street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, SE 132"d Street off of 148th Avenue SE shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-foot width each, not the 16 feet proposed. PLAN REVIEW SEWER 1. The development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE)from SE 128th St. (NE 4th St.) to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4th St. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 2. System Development Charges of $585 per single family house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. 3. A special assessment for the East Renton Interceptor shall be required and a latecomer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. WATER 1. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Renton Fire Department Standards/Codes. DRAINAGE 1. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the downstream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements are required for the project as a SEPA mitigation measure. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. System Development Charges of$385 per building lot will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The project will require full street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving, street drainage, street lights and undergrounding of overhead utility lines. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet,with a minimum of 32-feet wide pavement within the plat required. GENERAL All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. POLICE Once developed, there would be approximately 161.32 calls for service (CFS) annually to this development. PARKS 2. Recommend trail connection through site to proposed County Regional Trail system through County-owned Colasurdo property designated for future park development by City of Renton and annexed into the City. May want to consider a notification on the face of the plat that adjacent park property is potentially programmed for active park development. 3. A bicycle lane has been identified on NE 4th Street in the City's Trails and Master Plan. Street improvements should include a 5-foot wide bike lane. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. • MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences. There are eight wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. This proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. Location: NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street) on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510 A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, September 28, 1999, at 9:00 AM to consider the Preliminary Plat and Variances. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: September 6, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot NOT1QE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,V,ECF Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for single family residences.The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8.Primary access would be from 148'Ave SE,which is located along the west boundary of the site.SE 132 Street would be extended through the site.A series of internal Igop roads off SE 132i°Street provide east/west internal access.There are 8 weUands and an intermittent stream en the site.The proposal would fill 10.150 s f,of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 38.119 sq 8.The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. 1 Location:NE 41°Street(SE 128'Street)on the oath,SE 136'Street on the south,between 148'Avenue SE end 152i°Avenue SE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED • THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20,1999. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on September 28,1999,at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat and Variance. The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing.A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one weak before the hearing.If the Environmental Determination Is appealed,tha appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. ( 'fib -.;':^pp r Or Ri —ll��l ''''.1 7 ill LBW ,,,.Qom tlrntetfler.! iYw .-.. r°2>.G{�aeeq a+.ue fil.' � . 6+• • itILewwt�"a,garvw 5._ ,„,_.,.,.....,., „...„,..,,.. lirAls,ii...t-.,".',., its IY-`- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, ..1SS11 60\170 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in ,_7 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ,S-)D t a2- .3- I15'9 • Signed: le",e,„- 2---. ATTEST: Subcribed and worn before me, a Nortary Public in for a State of Washington residing in`� , on the /Y ckA day of . MARILYN K r1CHEFF ) )1‘L ram,,, --d- /-C NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KA FF COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 JUWE 29,2003 STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE August 31, 1999 Project Name Maplewood Estates Preliminary Rat Applicant Burnstead Construction File Number LUA-99-069, PP, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal to subdivide approximately 62.7 acres into 218 lots for development of single family residences. The property is in the eastern portion of Renton and was part of a recent annexation to the City. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by second or third-growth forest. Two zoning designations apply to the site. The area north of SE 132nd Street (Division 1) is zoned Residential-5 DU/AC (R-5)and 74 homes are proposed on this portion of the site. The area to the south of SE 132nd Street (Division 2) is zoned Residential-8 DU/AC R-8 and 144 homes are proposed in the R-8 zone. Primary access to the site would be provided by constructing the south leg of the existing 148"Avenue SE right-of-way, which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would connect off 148th Avenue SE.and extend through the site in an east/west direction. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal access to lots. Eight wetland areas and intermittent streams associated with the wetlands have been delineated on the site. The wetlands vary in size from approximately 1,763 s.f. to 74,825 sq. ft. All the wetlands have been classified as Category 2 wetlands. Construction of the street network would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at the narrowest section of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. The applicant proposes to create 36,119 sq. ft. of wetlands as compensation, exceeding the required mitigation replacement ratio of 3:1. The application includes 2 variance requests related to the five road crossings over the wetlands and intermittent streams. One variance is from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations which restricts tree cutting and land clearing within 25 feet of streams. The second variance is from Wetland Regulations. The code requires a minimum 25-foot wide buffer for Category 2 wetlands, even with provisions allowing for wetland buffer averaging. The applicant is not providing the minimum buffer width where the roads cross the wetlands. The plat would be developed in 3 to 4 phases over a period of about 5 years. Project Location NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street)on the north, SE 136th Street on the south, between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. Exist. Bldg. Area gsf NA Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 63.77 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental FA w Committee Staff Report . MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 2 of 8 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. 2. The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 3. The applicant shall work with Water District#90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. 5. The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The applicant's share of the signal cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 7. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. II yI ERCRPT 1' City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental R v Committee Staff Report MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 3 of 8 II Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Observe recommendations of the geotechnical report. FIRE 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300 feet are required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500 feet and will require that Lots 33 through 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per City street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, SE 132nd Street off of 148th Avenue SE shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-foot width each, not the 16 feet proposed. PLAN REVIEW SEWER 1. The development will be required to install a new 12-inch sewer main in 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE)from SE 128th St. (NE 4th St.)to approximately 240 feet south of NE 4th St. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. 2. System Development Charges of $585 per single family house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. 3. A special assessment for the East Renton Interceptor shall be required and a latecomer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. WATER 1. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Renton Fire Department Standards/ Codes. DRAINAGE 1. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the downstream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements are required for the project as a SEPA mitigation measure. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Renton. j 2. System Development Charges of $385 per building lot will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. I. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The project will require full street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving, street drainage, street lights and undergrounding of overhead utility lines. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet,with a minimum of 32-feet wide pavement within the plat required. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report , MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY FIAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 4 of 8 GENERAL All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. POLICE Once developed, there would be approximately 161.32 calls for service (CFS) annually to this development. PARKS 1. Recommend trail connection through site to proposed County Regional Trail system through County- owned Colasurdo property designated for future park development by City of Renton and annexed into the City. May want to consider a notification on the face of the plat that adjacent park property is potentially programmed for active park development. 2. A bicycle lane has been identified on NE 4th Street in the City's Trails and Master Plan. Street improvements should include a 5-foot wide bike lane. PLANNING The applicant shall pay a School Mitigation Fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District, in the amount of $2,797 per lot, for all proposed lots located within the District boundary. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) recommends that the applicant work with King County to provide a trail easement connecting the County park property to the south and other County-owned parcels located to the northeast of the subject property. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is relatively flat, with slopes generally in the range of 2% to 8%. The site slopes in a southwesterly direction and there are some small areas where slopes exceed 10%. Topographic elevations range from approximately 500 feet at the northeast corner of the property to approximately 395 feet at the southwest corner. Clearing and grading the site would be necessary in order to construct streets, utility improvements, and to prepare building pads. To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation and organic surface soils would be stripped to a depth of 6 to 12 inches. The applicant estimates the stripped organic topsoil would total approximately 75,500 cubic yards and it would be unsuitable material to use for structural fill. The preliminary grading plan indicates approximately 37,000 cubic yards of cut and 137,600 yards of fill. By dropping the site one foot, the cut/fill quantities would be within 30,000 cubic yards of balancing. Gravel backfill would be imported to the site for utility and street construction. The probable source of material is Renton Sand &Gravel. A geotechnical report has been prepared for the proposed development by Terra Associates, Inc. The report concludes that soil conditions on the site are suitable for supporting residences on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils below the upper organic surficial soils. Alternatively, structural fill placed and compacted above the native soils could be used to support building foundations. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069, PP,ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 5 of 8 Potential erosion impacts that could occur during site preparation and construction would largely be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan. Staff recommends a condition to ensure that Temporary Erosion Control measures are maintained throughout the duration of construction on the site. Weekly reports should be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Mitigation Measures: Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Weekly reports shall be submitted on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation submitted by the Project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to final plat approval. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance. 2. Surface Water Impacts: A Wetland Evaluation/Conceptual Mitigation Plan has been prepared for the site by Terra Associates, Inc. A total of eight wetlands have been delineated on the site. The larger wetlands on the site are narrow, linear features that are associated with drainage swales or intermittent stream corridors, and generally drain in a northeast to southwest direction. Three of the wetlands (Wetlands F, G and H) are exempt from City wetland regulations because the Category 2 wetlands are less than 2,200 square feet in size and are hydrologically isolated. These wetlands would be filled for construction of the project and no compensatory mitigation is required. The regulated wetlands on the site range in size from 8,976 square feet to 74,825 square feet. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the wetlands are classified as palustrine forested wetlands, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). The wetlands are considered Category 2 wetlands according to the City of Renton regulations because the areas are greater than 2,200 square feet, are near headwaters of intermittent streams, and are dominated by a forested vegetation class with minimal disturbance. The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Construction of the street network for the proposal would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. No other wetlands would be impacted for construction of residential building lots. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. City regulations require a 3:1 mitigation ratio (created wetland:impacted wetland) for a total of 30,450 square feet. The applicant is proposing to create approximately 36,119 square feet of wetlands in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. According to the applicant, relatively little excavation would be required to convert these upland areas to wetlands. Wetland A with the adjacent mitigation area would form a large open space area and wildlife corridor across the site. Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer. The code allows for buffer averaging where the total required area of buffer is not reduced and where the required buffer width is not reduced by more than 50%, or 25 feet for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging, impacting a total of 68,679 square feet of buffer area and replacing this with 69,240 square feet of upland buffer area. The applicant maintains a minimum 25-foot buffer width except where adjacent to the five road crossings. The road crossings would pass directly over wetlands at these locations and it would not be possible to provide a buffer without converting the existing wetland to an upland buffer. The road crossings would impact approximately 20,710 square feet of buffer area. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from wetland regulations to maintain a minimum buffer width of 25 feet or to not reduce the required 50-foot buffer by more than 50%. The applicant proposes to replace the impacted buffer area adjacent to Wetlands A, B, C, D, and E. The replacement buffer would be provided in 16 areas ranging in size from approximately 231 square feet to 19,985 square feet. A significant feature of the buffer averaging plan is that the replacement buffer area would expand the buffers required between Wetlands A and B, thereby creating a habitat connection between the two wetland and wetland buffer areas. This effectively increases the area of contiguous, well-established habitat preserved within the proposed development. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report . MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 6 of 8 The applicant's wetland mitigation plan and buffer averaging plan would not result in significant impacts to the environment. In order to avoid impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer during construction, the applicant is required to stake the outer edge of the wetland and buffer prior to initiating grading or construction activities on the project site, per RMC 4-3-110T4. The applicant has submitted a storm drainage report prepared by Dodds Engineering Inc. The report estimates that the developed portion of the site would be concentrated on approximately 48 of the 63 acres. Approximately 15 acres of wetlands, wetland buffers, and park would be preserved in a natural state. The developed portion of the site would be improved for single family development and would yield approximately 48% impervious area and 52% pervious area. All site drainage would be collected in a roadway drainage system with roof drains connected directly to the system. Portions of the stormwater flows would be directed to the wetland for recharge purposes. The proposal includes a large, 2-cell stormwater pond in the southwest corner of the site. The 2.33-acre stormwater detention pond area is designed to hold a live storage volume of 205,000 cubic feet. The pond would be designed to retain a volume of water as a pond amenity, and sized for water quality treatment. Discharge from the pond would enter the existing swale which flows adjacent to the southwest property corner. The stormwater facility has been designed in accordance with the King County Stormwater Design Manual. The subject site is located in the Maplewood Creek drainage basin. There are ongoing erosion problems in downstream portions of the creek. To ensure that the proposal does not worsen existing downstream drainage problems in the area, City staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide additional stormwater detention, as has been required through environmental review for other developments in the area. Staff recommends that the release rate for the developed site be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2-year 24-hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site should be limited for the 10-year and 100-year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant designed the stormwater facility in accordance with requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant should demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume, to ensure that sufficient area is planned for the proposed stormwater facility. Mitigation Measures: The stormwater release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2-year 24-hour storm event through the 2-year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 10-year and 100-year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. The applicant shall demonstrate that the planned stormwater facility has sufficient capacity to handle the increased detention volume as required by this mitigation measure, prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Nexus: Storm &Surface Water Drainage Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 3. Fire Services Impacts: The proposal site is located within the service area of Water District#90 which would provide fire and domestic water service. City Fire Department standards require a fire hydrant capable of 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. The applicant should work with Water District#90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow is available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for residences will be required if fire flow does not meet the fire flow requirement. The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction at a rate of$488 per single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time of issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall work with Water District#90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow within 300 feet of all new single family structures are available to serve the proposal. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fire flow does not meet the City standards. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488 per single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review(SEPA) ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP,ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 7 of 8 4. Transportation Impacts: Primary access to the site would be provided by constructing the south leg of the existing 148tth Avenue SE right-of-way, which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would connect off 148th Avenue SE and extend through the site in an east/west direction. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal access to lots. A traffic impact analysis has been prepared for the proposal by Transportation Planning& Engineering, Inc. The report analyzed level of service (LOS) impacts at intersections that would be affected by the proposed development. The primary intersections analyzed in the study include the intersections at 148th Ave. SE/SE 128th St., 156th Ave. SE/SE 128th St. and Duvall Ave. NE (138th Ave. SE)/NE 4th Ave. The traffic consultant has indicated that traffic operations at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE will deteriorate to warrant signalization in the near future. The applicant should install a traffic signal at this intersection. The applicant's share of the cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. The proposed subdivision would result in an increase in traffic trips on the local street system and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The trip generation values are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual which estimates 9.55 average daily trips per single family residential lot, or a total of 2,123 average daily trips for the proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per average daily trip attributable to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $159,225. The applicant estimates that 15,000 to 20,000 cubic yards of soil material would be hauled off-site, resulting in 1,500 to 2,000 truck trips. Every attempt would be made to balance cut and fill to minimize the amount of material exported. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which addresses erosion and sedimentation controls and states that construction activities would be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. Construction activity within 300 feet of residential areas is limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 128th St. and 148th Ave. SE. The applicant's share of the signal cost will be determined by their proportion of trips through the intersection from 148th Ave. SE. The determination of the cost shall be subject to the approval of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to recording the subdivision. The applicant may set up a latecomer's agreement to recover some of their proportional cost of the signal from future development. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. This fee is payable prior to recording the subdivision. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 5. Community Services/Parks Impacts: The proposed subdivision includes a one-acre private park in the south portion of the site. The park would be improved for use by residents of the subdivision. The park would be located adjacent to Wetland A, resulting in a large, open space area connecting the neighborhood. In addition, there is an undeveloped King County park (approximately 20 acres) located directly south of the subject property. This parkland is expected to be eventually annexed into the City and improved for active and passive recreation. The proposal includes an open space tract to provide an easy pedestrian access between the proposed subdivision and the future park. King County Parks and the Renton Parks Department have requested a trail connection to link the park property to the south with other County-owned parcels located adjacent to the northeast of the subject property. The trail segment is mapped as part of the County's Regional Cedar River to Sammamish Trail system. The proposal would create 218 lots for construction of single family residences. Future residents would make use of existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate for the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The proposed on-site park may be credited toward one-third of the total parks mitigation fee. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Fi v Committee Staff Report MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-99-069,PP, ECF REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 8 of 8 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $530.76 per new single family lot. The proposed on-site park may be credited toward one-third of the total parks mitigation fee. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to recording the subdivision. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 6) Schools Impacts: The subject site is located partially within the Renton School District and partly in the Issaquah School District. The school district boundaries follow the alignment of SE 132nd Street through the subject site, with the Issaquah School District to the north and the Renton School District to the south of SE 132nd Street. The City adopted an ordinance to collect a school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School District of $2,797 per residence, for all new single-family residences constructed within those portions of the District that are also within Renton's municipal boundaries. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 7) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts: The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in April 1999. The City Council established the zoning on the site concurrent with the annexation. Residential-5 DU/AC (R-5) was applied on the site to the north of SE 132nd Street. Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)zoning was applied south of SE 132" Street. The proposal includes 74 lots in the R-5 zone and 144 lots in the R-8 zone. The proposed residential density in the R-5 Zone is 4.24 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) which meets the maximum allowed density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre. Proposed density in the R-8 Zone is 4.64 dwelling units per acre. The R-8 Zone allows for a minimum density of 5.0 dwelling units per net acre and a maximum density of 8.0 dwelling units. City Code permits the Reviewing Official to reduce or waive the minimum density for reasons including lack of access or physical constraints on the subject parcel. The proposal complies with the development standards of the applicable zoning designation. The proposed subdivision would convert a large undeveloped parcel into a residential neighborhood. Although the proposal preserves a significant area of open space on the site, the conversion of the undeveloped site to residential use would result in unavoidable impacts to various elements of the environment. However, the site is within the King County urban growth boundary and with annexation there is an expectation of urban-level development. There are no significant land use impacts anticipated to result with the proposal. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA { E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP, 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. k1- _ . _ -__J --- SCALE: t" = 200' ii i ---- I '� _ 4 is-7 . . . H__ . IDaT—__ . R,,71--.-5•- ----.... _-------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION au�wa�iuwr �/ �`0 ..IRm A. pIDE.3FAD CMMTRUGTION St0..IOL AyE.NF.4 33,d p y OlLLlyTC.SWNMYlTON fWOe X S POOR MO Rw'-``.�._ �I TMWNSHIP NEET iS NOR K RAW/a FbT�l1M r ODIML N ICH6 COLN,. ` =.Ip IU]1Ce O_1�� SUD.IINDTp4 ExCEIT THAT/ORTN)N T EREOE CP M Nam 00000 FEET LTM]EAST CP M ENO LP!OEM MOT b 1EET Cr PAID eUeDMeIQk MO EX ETT TIAT • IroRTION INEEEOI L1Ne M EbT x)SOO SECT CI M earn+Ye00 FEET C. 00000�R/ETX IIgER/BURVE7OR W a ---. sE SIB=�� ` M NORTH McOD PELT O SAID 7103NAPOTAINc44COaT AIO lxCEPT TMT PORTION TlIeQ 1 B �'1�� V I --- COIMQ•DED N Kra COURT MPEIPOR CwN CAUSE NfGIR Ann,ION eamIEAPT ;DOPE ExGNEERS,RC. QCP-NIT+AVE.NE.NATE x00 t Z e, _ OITM*MEET. EELLENI.WAMINSTQI N OM wTRAIM N } CST "AIECf1 0. r`GONTIGT�15, yG41b J IOPIOER5. !�PrWwwr �j 1 ` , �,�`�•' U Y M EAST W1LI Q M.CPT 11.AL"Q M NORTWEPT GUNNER O SECTION N. JAMEPEvN J.V0.yOCRSAIDIN.yyyw �! ,��'; eql , TOYMIT))NMRIN,RYCL•WT,WLLIAYETiE tIIEDIr N KNi LMMT. Cm•Q__--,,`` �_�+ Alet 'I.'C.W -..-� YYSNNOTOµ!FOPS M EAST HALF Q M NORTHEAST MATTlR Cr M NCRTAY[eT • ,.,11I,rr P� I.E7' MtI QN MAKER CV M NORTYCPT MARTEN.ATo EXCEPT M EAST w PENT Q wD • IS�/ II`` ��\ --- nerneEP CCANITED TO KDES Ca MT FOR ROAD,AM EXCEPT TWT NroRNGN SITE STATISTICS �Iu!A ¢p 1 i_, Omo'egiow CQOOKD N RIO CMMT SUMO=COURT CAUSE RIMER P32iN. _ �� OPA° „ V DIVISION_1__ xeAcxa Poe -!.E .:Ta.wbb MAR -)D �.: 1►0. *►:�.�: 0�•4 Nolet►1 ct<sEo ea. 6ENCHMARK o �T�Is%W'Ml��,,��p�; �� 1 rorx ei*E aTEA. >.Tn in.ert aay.e.ACRE L \__\i/* • ; 17 MICR MMfO PER Cm a MITCH PUNT OH NAND REP DATM "RT'JSEO USE, eNGLE FAH,'NRie y C`{ I _�_` �.�R • 1. • _.---._---- RYPf.r DRAM e1RICE COW.N M NT..!ATI ET.rSE UPTN MOO R+ • / •. ` ET/.WTI AVE S[. M.6 LOTe, TA DMei10 C 1E N TTNI omen ^�~ ``�,'�'I I I4iDIVIeION2 I R ` .-,. 4.* *"1 / EC Arun OR MUM T'CilR1) xu TOTAI. ,`��i-`�\�` ,� I�� n ntos.BROKEN pRAeS SURrACE CRC.N M NT.et WA OT.. A N - MOTH IS. R EXISTRG ZONRG. R-,-•1006 of eE t))M h. ' 41•• •�' / . •� j ,' EL H AV OR(IPTOU rEIEM) R-P-SwU el SE u)w h _----_ -A sti 27 I`� W.1�-•� N -.__-_.. STREET AREA. IDJS I4.tNPDs GP NYE, ..0/ lr/.0/"• n� � �,� EE n-- OPEN N•.ti.. i.A AC 06212 C EITE, Q ---- 1 f .Eti t ,d"fid-.--, N �• ��1.A. \�INF.� .r _ LI1.-J'J.1ill "! -' titrd-Y-,,n-,----2-._:-..:.__--;.' w9 . - - _ ____,___, a ��,r, , ova, @�� . a *` = 43 "- AV N 2 p /�40 `l.��0 �'r, _ _-DIVISION_2 _ '�E - -• 'I i '; f ' 1... w 4. ^ Q 1t earth aR eF at � ,L. .� e 2 it, tui. tu(s .00 co • r -'-��i v �' 1 r wmh r. I • D . Iaa,. . x • LMU ..la • ~`-V __.—. _. RENTON la ` :N- TI man wl _ & � wTwR w. iri. 1 I]^ y FT I , �� 1 T �g 4 o SHEET INDEX -- wo< " sNEeT OF . - ,. 1' _ .•iiL . ', I ROMPER I 1 4 tL VICINITY MAP ® NEIGHB0RH00D DETAIL MAP PROJECT.w8 >oDD. a��ea NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. rc 11�, f�ETL�CZ (I I//,1 I_,-"4'----1 r ' i*.< 1 �1 / 41, 1 • yl-- z • ••I • oh IV / / / l I r`--1 I 1 n _ J , I 1_ I Y r ,, / I 1 �:f i / A a_i .-I- ;r .m�'iY i !i —.i i - i I I / / \ I' • 7 ,�.`,_ ,� i oo , L..y,_-LPA � d• I - 4 11 ri" ' g 4 ".l�r.- - I 1 .Z 1 / \7(/ 1 .\ .I Ivwr II 1 - I I a� r /�,�' I I .� `,� ,� LL->�--J i i I w 1J. r»n".1 ( I • I ; L---J� Y'1 I r I g Ir_ �,y • / 1 ' y I . I Iwwr. I I f ns�`; 1 war I 1'.�‘1 Iw0•M1 • 1"/ '� 1 1 1 1 Sao r. 1 ;Y L_ J LJ L___ ,/ 411% �;q 1 y , 1 ,,, 1 Ly __J, I TR.�' O (� '�-1RICT C 1 1 1 >A L_ / \ C ` �1(, / �I r 1 I 1 . ww,...w.... 1; .,—.:.� , ". /.\\\\r"�, i_�x�) i----� /rr.� / .♦ ^' 'Ix� (l'' �/- t r---�1 Q.I 1 ^ I g _� -- "`.' I ay '� (./- ,\\\ » \`\y/ I .oe r. 1 % I' "a`�. / - I b L - I i -� \ f 34 \ 1 .�'/I t/ \�``:w.". \\\✓ . /,._ / ' �E / i \ " `\> i' `�> `♦ewe") I i«a Y. g� yt'rj ll.^ �i I ��j. /''\\\ » \\` .„/' ... ,/ 0ETLNID • / ,r�`� _'// ♦` / fo /i� ��^\♦.`� �r w 3R �'I �". \\\ i ' A UETLNOA ` F,I AREA I /r / `♦, / /// 01 /> q // ter;/ I�+ll III!. I J t n.» ) / / / r p ,,, ,, pj II 2 I•I 7a 1 - ✓ wn• [( ( _ J sr '1 I'r r �. ) / j' �\ ,♦\" i / 4 ii b , �`♦♦y // 3q �..— ICS _ w §RR , 1 • LI iY/ i/'\♦\.R•�. - j-. / // ---� I ' / ---,--,/ �♦,,r.. .R'~ LLET=MIDI I$.43 /1 ill$11, os �I o I'— I I 1 \ 1 11 I ` � � lV 1�i a. ;I I I I j\ I - n eI--- vrs � !° / I . r♦ . n ) ;''♦\♦` •)y 440 / �J L_ JLAY_J �\ r 1 z. I n.,.,b / < ♦ " �: \ / _ ' ♦ ♦♦\ / ` \ i♦ \1 ♦♦ )♦\ 1 ♦ ^ r • /, I I vt, w ) �° am ♦) / 1. I I 1 1 I I I It' 1 I 1 I 1 • I //ri I \ 3 Q R! ♦♦.L",',n♦ •♦ r ',� mil_ yJl / Ig FYI 1.,.~r. i 1 „ :sit s l9 !! ;� en I *wow .I •;2 'I ps"• i Y Z k W^ / ♦"'0/ ♦\ \ `\ ,'/1 ♦ —_ L_>�a yMJ L+~" N. �'O°rJ ! I I.Y L .( .`I(/ 2 II ��v I I \♦+Oe",'�'� b '�//^ »w w w w w " II -I II I 14 EL ' v\ 12 , v,.. »w r. 1 1,1..N I.1 I: I 00 1 , 1j1 I I L---- 4 r_J co ! /• :""'1';';-"N,\ /v - ` 1 1 m.Y. • I I ' r t a I b 1 " M I y F' n r ---1 '. M V <`I I / K T4CTN _i " ;' ., _ 1 1 I �, I,:•.e Y.i wWY'I I�wr.1 I Y 1 ,awY, ',..e.. � • I!. • I''T ,1 7 J ' IL._ moo w4wYMRmY •( IN -Ji L_p- i Le I I I, y . Q��C�1 ,\ I;; OW".�- �, \♦tl".,..- — ___ ___J L_N_J L___J L___J I L M_ tr— . 8 1 ' I )d --1• I____ �____ / I b ♦ ��'µ' �> - I LLCTLdrb PTO�E FILLED ./"I I L ti • T - <♦ ... // I I I I I I I , J 1-:..--1 n.acTs 114 — • r--- T -I iv 1 �r U r + I Y - / -. 1 I • r I -JI O�I'4� . �-� ; - 7 l r--- 1 �=r�i {--.� >` ! I71T;�-` 1 I I 1 1 ' I ..a I 11. I I l f---7-.I I I i J D/ • 1 �� d y { •• II / I 1 i + - =a._'_ -♦- / ..%.r. ' L.w.j._1 .m.v.J.9 '1", I,� l� •I J$ 9 I `� y I #' I I "_ I/ 1 ' I i R O �- n I ♦may I Z s • - -•4. ` F - __. 7__v_ _ - -- -- ___ .____L "J J____LLrl KU"J a I i wwr 1 < w rc °n .oc.v ._ . . zr,,re/AN c.«ry NM'001911/ •.. .e - --.'_. - _ J__�L _ Ir".� o 0 0 ` Ig»o Ar p l.f17!®w. �. ,,, 1p w1 e p W SHEET or ., 1 r SCALE: '�■ • 50. a • , ._ �pt;ilr�6t aTw wMOJf<i .�[w NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. a SEE SHEET 7 OF 4 g 4 Z . L J Y r / / I • i i+,e... 1 1 ` i - : 1 j i i L. j i c^ ' ; - I Y I I 1 •.e r Lam'' \ r _I -, ~ .e .e ' ip Y ~ w/,roL»e,wE•t`\ t I Y I r' \ I _ \ wC I oars.. ; i b. SCALE: 1• = 50' Y LO•Y" 'Y — �� ,\ "�\ 'a ° r- ,.� •a sve,..a••uww u°n, 1 , \, Y HJ Y 1 .••w. 1 Y 1 ...•u I i i; I `J 1 , `.� ' 1 I \/�� 1 •1 / , \ p�q• 1 1 I 1 1 = ••� '" •I� 1 1 t 1'/Y / • ./ _/ OC ' I ' r 1 I a•ow t .i : • .1, \ ,I 1. uETLJNDE ( - N7N'7lla� ma* z \ L I �---_ _ --/ --- ___ T.T.Y. 1 I I ./� / I I ; l / . A IN t+ ' ILIMO \ :JL- -I \ /' _ / • I jj\ � • 11 ` e \ e ' /" oY. ,,9L ...... :/ I / , , / 1a.itia _I Y 1 (1, r LANSSZ.R'�, A ,�a . / �'. ) " � • e' / i �uenao a J'"/ A I`1 ° i J -•+ � - �.. \ 4Y� 1••Y ///•� uerLbwoe / j ,// �/ 9 ° f / I/ -$ L Y I 1 mob �: ---.J n / 1, / �-( nuc+c CI WSZA A, L" , "-.-._J I-- , °• /'• ,-:`•s -/'. M.= III / / //�— :•'»'� CO CI L • dum�/ a i l l r r / — / V. _ —y1 / • / 1 M. r��K .1 , Ile-1 L_� --, Y' .sM V. / n `` , / / �/ I • _ `-/ - / / % a-- Ry FrW1 '\.. �fa 1.41 • 1+1 , ', r - y r; / ��r- /�� \• \ -/ / LJfi� / m / l�f ; / I • / / 1 ---'J L --J Igg, • • i , 1, W� I I .:v. i ;I ss...Y. j,.., -- — -• // « ! \-•IEA __ _ / /r--'• \�l.�---'4 L ,ioe�,Y ' 4 � Q Z wd ,•�.r 1 y I s 3• / • j / ;, 1 2 / / j /. I E--- ' 41 ' as , ' ;l -- �� ; I / /-:% % I r 1 I 31 t 1 • L^ w I / /� / / O - -=-- I boa w I.Y \ / / /-. I. I~ ' "' I � I L -J � / n - L1Po--J . / I mewl I soar. I I L. J I L I ..ram i I • h / • /i 1 w /•,/ sr. J / 4 // d /�' .E -.11- -'i i ` lseel.r- 1 a �. 'I I i l I r-----, / ( \ 1 1 r 3a1 r I L -1 [ y J I -- ----^ e / 'tu..cT1 / 1 rnJr__JI 'O' -- -- -- / / 4 i i 2 I'ae - - - P i i • 7 tt bNI I / rb , �` urul+usr , / ! / /„ / i 1 $ I m , r i°O � t I .} Y. I :• I �> % :srr/ Y r I I ( / -- ---J 1 Ln_-11 -- I Su I , , •• :./ / i/ — 1 M , 2 1 ___ I , of i I .. Eilr10 A1I ,.r I i —�� / s_ : - � .-� 1 / L J ( 2 > X fAi /or .M" •,. t � � // ! �'_N1 r-4. _ 't. J//? I / -/ '¢ k `.♦� . r. 7 r___l1 I•aa w. ' 8 • o a n r • I / I/ -, I san , Y �l r--�^1 1 ' \ / • aoI _ ' SEET,•. .)1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 or r. I __J _, L_ w' J t �1 1 I II. II r__-_� / L' cJr I L___JI et I 'r I n L SEE SWEET 4 OF 4 PROJECT H,rE• 94108 e 1 F . T VELOPMENT PIANNIN CITY OF RENTON August 4, 1999 AUG 0 oj► 1999 RECEIVED Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat LUA-99-069, PP, ECF, V Dear Mr. Rosen, In regards to the above-mentioned Plat, we are concerned with a couple of issues that have not been addressed. 1. There is a significant amount of water that flows off the Maplewood Estates Plat. The "DNS" requests to fill some of the wetlands, then the proposed road access of 148th st.stops at S.E.132°d St., even though the majority of density continues all the way to S.E. 136th St. (Please see enclosed plat copy). This would allow a significant diversion of water flow onto all the private property owners southwest of 132°d St. The burden and cost of diverting this developments wetlands over to property owners to the west and south of this plat will not be acceptable. Turning our currently usable land into useless wetlands. This should not be allowed to occur, requiring the proposed 148th St. access continued South along the entire plat, including proper storm drainage, would eleviate the problem of removing all the vegetation and replacing it with cement. 2. The population growth with this development will significantly increase the use of undeveloped wooded areas and trails leading into the King County Park at Maplewood. This increases the chance of fires to all the private landowners to the west and King County Parks to the South. There would not be any access for Fire trucks to these areas even though currently there are fire hydrants located all along 148`h and S.E 136th St. These hydrants were clearly placed there for when this land would be developed. By not requiring 148th St. to be completed these hydrants will not have any access and be useless. In closing we ask that you consider these issues and your support when deciding on the future of this very desirable area. S' erely, 7 Joe and Laurie Tarantola I I-0 s M- (3 6 - cf, — NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. • SITE STATISTICS a/HE /A GPLIC c 0D-~DDT~ANL MI.S TWa ITE]GI I WAb4YTDH YDPJ AMA DMTlm® AlAWraMIELY el AGREE fats/ b CONTACT. .Y[I ATF LAIDID40 E PLAN.ERJEI•r MEER/BURVE70R STDITPO TJANI CEl4C.PANE. DODOS ENCODERS.Na. Li-- EXC�VITKN llp0.CIGIC YAIOe a405.NOT~AVE N!.SUITE WO ' Ecu_FIS.W AVV. TQI UI E01 er C.ANATon uT�oc/cm.YKme r te/sae-Ten CGNTACT.CNKD J.WADDED-ma.... Jr,A.oLaeN. etmll a r tit': bd — — --Tras�rED—lt..� SCALE: 1' = 200' ��> "� rKT' 1i• SE SHE • 4'=' " a f Ft 'N M21'M Ii r: — !rr[W)-. • A S SBEKMK FILL SP°E $! S D FtC DDM L n _--O 1!W ems INCENS CONCRETE C AGF M a:MM } e S' Z N N•Y'Oeyl RWD. ` .. ]KB1 ±+•'• NM NOW DCmI DVADE oisA� " . MM.. NEDVG DKVnO OKREXGVAIF 04I 4 A*O py.(q[q SI JP, r S Y OWL AREA ID MONDE A SWAN!3b-BASE. ,I J'O[LWr CDVL%E)E.4DEM.W' 3 O CEKNr IET KR1K1L CMSANO iE-I1BfX QSFNMERfJ x irk—' OMO SECIEIV O-O OZ O 13� J ,�edv i S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS p e e 41., ;_ c,,z .0 r e•.' ..n SCALE k W 5 air .• .., m. iiiitu, /' I EE.oNa sr VW JB'AIN AwCA(INNIAZ as r) RAT. OS / • .z I' SJ' Ie' J'�6' la' IX ]' e "apt M �� _ GEttiN,cDi Ce Ia Ea -�-�,—OJ rs -Ir DJ I `. s ....AP.' _ 4 r _ili LAW 'MAW f1LENr .ff£N.C.NAKANNT r COYC9E2 Q Q ,n CONC8CrE SIXWALK SECIKYI Or MIS 5N611 KBIICAC OAFS B GUM? RR -L V IP 4,� `y4 - S.E. 132ND STREET ' 3 `a tk 44t Oj, 0 {r.:(-J JD '° .C � �� F/1* 4 S I!'y !e' /6' --SQJ" I' = CO wakeO /11 .JI - ' IHaJ �I J ,C41 C �j O , • CONNr"ANA/lE \-r BRfJ(CF4NT y J OO OO D811� L ILRBGL CURB B Wr1EP CC IOWOJO 9DCEALY m OBI OA10010� I SECBOv A-A ■ 148TH AVE S.E. _ -r eisisi�=t� t r (S.E. 128TH ST. TO S.E. 132ND ST.) 'rorct � W(J ,1 � � ST Lv� A_ RID . • SJ' IB' of IJ' JJ'Riw S P.I W y y�R O $'41 • 3 J I �J '+ F I- R`rIC SI w'L. E T -II/(X El)pI) G � /E O o O f CDVOPf1C.SgEN K KNOCK C1.RA t CUrIER SHEET OF SfCJKw B-B TYPICAL ON-SITE ROAD SECT/ON 1 4 NO SCAT! nn - D 94188 I W 10415 - 147th Avenue 0 `� • Renton, WA 98059 C/ pA 4,1 August 3, 1999 �pFi1/T Peter Rosen 4 A Development Services Division " f� O �ti1 0 4,/ 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 �� ,`9`99 Dear Mr. Rosen: e00 • RE: BURNSTEAD DEVELOPMENT-- Maplewood Estates I would like this letter to express my comments/questions/concerns about the proposed Burnstead development--Maplewood Estates. I have divided my concerns into two sections--Traffic and Stormwater Drainage. I believe that the following questions need answers in regards to road safety in the area and the concern for the salmon in the Cedar River. TRAFFIC The Traffic Analysis prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. , shows that the second entrance to Maplewood is through a King County residential development on SE 132nd St. How many vehicles will be using SE 132nd to get to their home in Maplewood? There are 15 homes on this road -- which is,essentially, a one lane road. Barely two cars at one time can fit on this road. What safety items does Burnstead propose to put on this road to control the speed and traffic coming out of Maplewood? Do they plan to use speed bumps? What other mitigations are planned for this residential area? Will they widen the road? Is the developer working with King County to develop a safety plan for SE 132nd and 156th Avenue SE? Does the developer have a Traffic Concurrency for this development? On February 19, 1999, I spoke to a King County Traffic Planning Engineer(A. McManus)about the streets in the East Plateau area and Maplewood. She stated that the intersection of 148th and SE 128th is LOS F. With the planned improvements of the northbound side of 148th by Centex, the intersection will still remain LOS F. This same spokesperson stated that at that time, the County was working on the Burnstead development roads and was concerned about the wetlands. Renton seems to show little concern about wetlands. The County Engineer also stated that IF the Maplewood development had remained in the County, the County was going to make Burnstead put in a traffic signal at the intersection of 148th and SE 128th (NE 4th and Nile Ave). What plans does the City of Renton have to force the developer to alleviate the traffic problems at this intersection? A left turn lane will still make the traffic LOS E which is the worse(LOS E and LOS F are the worse traffic conditions according to King County). On March 12, 1999, the same traffic engineer testified at a King County Council Appeal Hearing regarding the traffic problem on SE 128th and 148th Avenue SE. She stated that the 148th Avenue SE and SE 128th intersection is LOS F and will remain LOS F after the improvements to the north side of 148th Avenue SE. In addition, I have a copy of a letter from Transportation Engineering which states that the intersection of SE128th and 148th Avenue SE is LOS F and remain LOS F even after the improvements by Centex. In October 1997, I rode a school bus from the Issaquah School District to take Apollo kindergarten students home. The bus driver told me that Issaquah bus drivers do not like making left turns from 148th Avenue SE onto SE 128th because of so much traffic at all hours of the day on SE 128th (NE 4th). Buses from Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue Christian Schools and also Metro travel from 6 am to 6-7 pm at night. Will school buses coming from Maplewood Estates cross SE 128th(NE 4th) safely en route to Apollo Elementary ? What will truck traffic going to Windwood/Maplewood do to the traffic congestion on both SE 128th and 156th? • At the intersection of SE 132nd and 156th Avenue SE, what safety measures will be used to control the traffic coming from Maplewood? Has Burnstead done a sight distance analysis for the exit on SE 132nd and 156th? When I traveled down this road on May 24, 1999, looking to the north, there is a telephone/electric pole that blocked my sight. Will there be a traffic signal to control the additional traffic coming from Maplewood? Will there be a separate left turn lane from SE 132nd to 156th so they can get onto 156th safely? What will the developer do to 156th Avenue SE to make if safer for residents along this road in view of the additional traffic coming from Maplewood? Residents north of SE 132nd St and 156th Avenue SE report that in the morning there is a long backup south on 156th from the stop light. How will the additional traffic from Maplewood affect this traffic problem? Residents also have difficulty in crossing 156th Avenue SE to get their mail and paper. They have asked the Renton postmaster if they can change the location of their mailbox. The Postmaster says"no because there is too much traffic on 156th Avenue SE. It would be too dangerous for the mailmen." If it is too dangerous for mail trucks on 156th, what will the additional traffic from Maplewood do on the road? Currently, Fire District 25 is having increased difficulty in accessing the right-of-way due to the heavy traffic on 156th. How will the additional traffic from Maplewood effect emergency vehicles trying to leave the fire station? How will the additional traffic on SE 128th(NE 4th)also impact the Fire District emergency vehicles in trying to make a response? Litter is another problem with the greatly increased traffic. Road noise is another problem. Trucks coming in from Maple Valley come up 156th Avenue SE in order to avoid the traffic in Renton and 1-405. They turn left and continue to Duvall Road, then continue their trips to Bellevue. How does the developer propose to mitigate these concerns? How will this impact the intersection of SE 128th and 148th Avenue SE? What about the proposed street of SE 135th St and SE 136th St? When does Burnstead propose to push the other access streets(SE 135th and SE 136th)through? I received an e-mail from the head of the King County Roads Dept. and he stated that when Burnstead was talking/working with the County, they also indicated that they would be pushing SE 136th through to 156th Avenue SE. What additional impact will this add to residents of 156th Avenue SE? How many vehicle trips will use this road to exit Maplewood? What does the developer proposed as mitigation to King County and the residents living along 156th Avenue SE, SE 132nd St., and SE 135th St.? The City of Renton and Burnstead also need to take into account the proposed Morrison development. This property is located east of the Windwood property. What will an additional 1700 daily round trips do to SE 128th(NE 4th) (that is 170 homes on 40 acres)? Mr. Morrison recently submitted a 10%petition for annexation to Renton. How will this impact traffic congestion to the intersection of SE 128th and 148th? Has the City of Renton entered into an agreement with King County that will make Burnstead pay Traffic impact fees to King County for the impact of Maplewood Estates traffic to King County residents? Has the developer and the City of Renton taken into account King County's planned rerouting of its garbage trucks? KC garbage trucks now leave the transfer station, go west on NE 4th St. into Renton and then out Maple Valley Highway to the Cedar Hills Dump. Once the new Cedar River Bridge is constructed, King County proposes to send its garbage trucks -- up to 60 per week-- east on NE 4th (SE 128th)to 156th Avenue SE, down 156th to Maple Valley Highway. How will this additional truck traffic effect the intersection of SE 128th/148th, and then to the other entrances to Maplewood Estates off of 156th Avenue SE at SE 132nd St. and SE 135th St. and SE 136th St.? What will this do for the SE 132nd St., SE 135th St. and SE 136th St. entrance? What will the addition of County garbage trucks do for this intersection (SE 128th and 148th) and the safety of the buses? In addition, a major focus of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan (Objectives T-J through T-N)"is to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicles. "(Final EIS for the Cedar River Basin Plan and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan). How does the developer plan to keep the daily round trips down below 2000 per day? What incentives ha. id City of Renton given Burnstead to keep ail Hs additional traffic off SE j 128th? I also have some additional questions-- listed below that need answers to. 1. What is the current capacity of each road (156th, SE 128th (NE 4th), 148th (Nile Avenue), SE 132nd ) based on "long distance between lights"or "short distance between lights"? 2. Are planners using PEAK hour spreading to shift traffic off of roads during their busiest times and assuming that commuters will shift their driving patterns to avoid gridlock? 3. What volume over capacity score did critical link roads have in the area? 4. Has Renton done its own traffic analysis of the roads in the area-- 156th Avenue SE, SE 128th(NE 4th), 148th Avenue SE (Nile Avenue); SE 132nd, SE 124th? If so, what does the data show? 5. Is Renton exempting any roads from the critical links test? 6. Are they(Renton and the developer) accounting for ALL growth in the area, including growth of county area and proposed areas of land to be annexed by Renton outside of this proposed development area? 7. Is Renton/the developer planning for schools and other critical infrastructure that will add traffic? 8. Has the City of Renton done its own analysis of SE 132nd St.? If so, what are the conclusions? Has the City of Renton done its own analysis of SE 135th St. and SE 136th St.? STORMWATER CONCERNS Within the last several months, the salmon population within the State of Washington has become more of a focus and concern with some species being listed on the Endangered Species Act. Maplewood Creek flows from the East Renton Plateau to Cedar River--which has a Sockeye Salmon population. The City of Renton proposes draining storm water from several new developments through Maplewood Creek to Cedar River. How will all the additional water effect Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? The developments include the Mr. Van Gard Self-Storage Facility, Windsong, Windwood and, now, Maplewood Estates. Windwood was platted in King County, but the drainage will still run from Maplewood Creek to Cedar River. Renton must adhere to rules to help preserve the sockeye salmon. How will increased runoff flows(from Maplewood Estates)effect private properties along Maplewood Creek? How will these new developments impact Cedar River? According to 10%annexation petition for the Morrison property, 90%of the property drains into May Creek. Where will the additional 10%go and how will that effect the flow from the Burnstead property? How will then the combined water flow/sediment coming from Maplewood Estates/Morrison property effect Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? Why hasn't Renton accepted stricter storm water standards other than the 1990 KCSWM Manual? A Renton planner recently confirmed to me that Renton uses KCSWM 1990 manual. This is almost the year 2000. Why is Renton lagging behind? I have some questions regarding surface water drainage. 1. What will the increase in sediment/water flow coming from Maplewood Estates down Maplewood Creek do to the cut throat trout and coho salmon population in the lower end of Maplewood Creek and in the Cedar River. What will this do to the spawning grounds located at the lower end of Maplewood Creek for these two fish? 2. What will the additional storm water from Maplewood do to the erosion problem (already present in Maplewood Creek)--down,u uam from Maplewood? What will Burnsteau to help stabilize and prevent further erosion problems for Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? 3. Will the increased water flow and sediment (not all the sediments will stay in the detention pond) eliminate the coho salmon population in the Cedar River? 4. How will Burnstead keep pesticides and other chemicals from flowing into Maplewood Creek and Cedar River? How will these pesticides and other chemicals effect the salmon/trout population? 5. Will Burnstead use an oil/water separator to keep street oil from flowing into Maplewood Creek and Cedar River, thus keeping the salmon and trout from being destroyed? Who will maintain these anti- pollution systems? 6. What about the overall impact of increased sediment/water flow coming from all the new developments on the East Plateau effect the Cedar River? What about the downstream impact to the Sockeye Salmon population? 7. Why can't Burnstead use a high-flow bypass pipe to take the water to Cedar River instead of having it go down Maplewood Creek? And if so, how will the velocity be reduced to prevent erosion at the pipe exit? How will the salmon/trout population be protected? 8. Has Renton given its approval to the Non-point Pollution Action Plan for the Cedar River? 9. Has DOE issued a NPDES permit to Renton for the area east of Renton --the location of Maplewood? Does Renton have a NPDES permit for the city? 10. How will the phosphate levels be controlled? 11. Will there be appropriate detention pond controls --- set to 1999 standards? 12. Who will be required to maintain the detention ponds? Will there be a homeowner's association to keep the ponds maintained and cleaned? Will there be something in the homeowner's by-law spelling out who will take care of the detention ponds? 13. Has the City of Seattle been informed of Renton's intentions to allow more sediment/water flow to come down Maplewood Creek to impact the Cedar River? This would be from all the developments previously listed. I would hope that these and other questions are answered before development is allowed to take place. Thank you. Sincerely, Metteleit, Sijo-nne-tb-, Claudia R. Donnelly cc: Randy Corman Ron Sims Brian Derdowski Issaquah School Board/Dr. Janet Barry Renton School Board/Dr. Delores Gibbons - r . i TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology ... ...<..., and Environmental Earth Sciences Op 1 0Op FNTA July 26, 1999 !� Project No. T-2798 11 �U� FHjbNNjNG 498.9 Mr. Peter Rosen Development Services `® City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 Subject: Variance Request for Buffer Reduction Maplewood Estates Renton,Washington City of Renton File Number 99069 Dear Mr. Rosen: Terra Associates, Inc. prepared a Wetland Evaluation/Conceptual Mitigation Plan for the Maplewood Estates project dated July 20, 1999. The report describes existing wetlands and intermittent streams on the property. It also includes a conceptual wetland mitigation plan and buffer averaging plan for the project. The project involves construction of a public road network designed to match existing roadways adjacent to the property and to provide traffic circulation within the proposed development. Because of the orientation of the site wetlands and seasonal streams, it is not possible to design the road network without wetland and stream crossings. There will be five locations where a new road will cross a wetland and/or seasonal stream. These crossings have been located at the narrowest sections to minimize the extent of the wetland impacts. We have prepared a conceptual wetland mitigation plan to compensate for the approximately 10,150 square feet of wetland area that will be filled for the five road crossings. A variance is necessary to provide relief from the required buffer between new construction and the wetland limits. It is not feasible to provide the minimum 25-foot wide buffer for the wetland at the road crossings. Several alternatives have been considered to mitigate for the reduced buffer at these locations. One approach is to designate the wetland area within 25 feet of the road grading limits as an indirect wetland impact, and include the area in the calculation of wetland fill and mitigation requirements. There would be approximately 9,000 square feet of impact. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com Mr.Peter Rosen July 26, 1999 With a mitigation ratio of 3:1 (wetland mitigation area:wetland impacted) for forested wetlands, approximately +I 27,000 square feet of wetland would be created. Grading to create more wetland area would result in clearing existing vegetation,creating additional disturbance to forested area adjacent to the wetland. The project involves direct filling of approximately 10,150 square feet of wetland for the road crossing, for which 30,450 square feet of new wetland will be created as mitigation. It would not be feasible to expand the grading for the wetland creation area without significant impacts to the site. Additional wetland creation would not result in an increase in the wetland functional value within the developed project. As an alternative mitigation for the reduced buffer area adjacent to the roadways, the area has been included in the buffer averaging calculations. This mitigation will not result in any site impact and will replace the habitat area represented by the reduced buffer. This mitigation will replace the affected area with well established habitat area. Mitigation by creating new wetland area would not further reduce the wetland impact because of the reduced buffer. Direct wetland impacts for construction of the road crossings would be adequately mitigated using the proposed mitigation at a replacement ratio of 3:1. Strict application of the requirement to maintain a minimum 25-foot buffer between new construction and the wetland area would limit the ability to construct a road network which would serve to extend the City's road system in an east to west direction, providing satisfactory and safe access to all parts of the property. If the wetland area within 25 feet of the edge of the road berms was treated as an indirect wetland fill and mitigated by creating new wetland area, it would be necessary to clear additional established native vegetation. This would result in the loss of mature vegetation without comparable gain in habitat value. Granting of a variance is to be decided by the Hearing Examiner on the basis of a number of review criteria. We believe that the proposed construction of the road system for the Maplewood Estates project meets the listed review criteria. Thesitewetlands li ear in nature and cross the roe from north to south. It would not be a. are n property rty possible to design a road system that meets the requirements for meeting existing public roads and for providing safe public traffic circulation within the development without the proposed wetland crossings. b. Granting of the variance would not be detrimental to public welfare. There are no adjacent properties or public facilities that would be affected by granting the variance. c. There is no economically viable alternative that has less impact on the wetland area that would also serve the City's requirements for public rights-of-way. d. Requirements for the road system are independent of the development density. The road crossings are necessary to provide the east to west connection to existing roads and to provide a safe circulation pattern with access to all sections of the property. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 2 - Mr. Peter Rosen July 26, 1999 e,f,g,h. The project has been designed to minimize impacts to the wetland and buffer. The unavoidable wetland impacts as a result of the required wetland buffer will have a minimal impact on the wetland functions, and the impact can be mitigated with the proposed conceptual mitigation plan. The proposed wetland mitigation conceptual plan and buffer averaging plan will address and mitigate for the wetland impacts. Final engineering design will incorporate measures such as siltation prevention to protect the wetland area and stream during construction. Other design measures, including culverts to maintain flow across the road berms and appropriately sized stormwater treatment facilities, will limit impacts to groundwater and surface water quality. i. Construction of the roads through the wetlands as designed will not result in damage to nearby properties and there will be no threat to the safety or health of people on or off the property. k. This project does not involve government or quasi-government facilities. This criterion does not apply. 1. Impacts to the wetland functional value as a result of the reduced buffer width at the road crossings can be mitigated. The variance being requested is a minimum variance to construct the w. road system to serve the subject development and the adjacent neighborhood. It is our opinion that the project design meets the review criteria to allow granting the variance. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. . Garet P. Munger Project Scientist cc: Mr. Ron Hughes,Burnstead Development 1 Mr. Craig Krueger, Dodds Engineers, Inc. Project No. T-2798 • Page No. 3 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1. (:) COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acreparcel into 218 lots for sing,a familyresidences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primaryccess would be from 148`'Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132 Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ft i 3<I) C,F:j P`1nuckW& - Conc9. cts.)x—ov'1'* B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �) q Signature of or Authorized Representative Date ROUTER Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ewe ?Y u + .01,\ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for sing,te family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south pad R-8. Primary access would be from 148` Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132n Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132n Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics 1 Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet LQ 5 la's Cti c LOA Yn-2vA-0 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Nowe, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /r s u a d-r"c-4-'27) tee- -‘0,, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7l/t/. 7,28/7 Signature of Director or Authorized Represe�tfative Date ROUTER Rev 1C/93 ( Y o CITY OF RENTON ,„,p FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • • MEMORANDUM INTO DATE: July 28, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for Maplewood Estates Environmental Impact Comments: 1. Fire mitigation fees are required at the rate of $488 per single family lot. This fee is payable prior to recording of the plat. Code Related Comments: 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300-feet is required. Preliminary utility plans do not meet any minimum requirements. 2. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat exceeds 500-feet and will require that lots 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system. This requirement shall be noted on the civil water plans and they will require a minimum 1-inch domestic water meter. 3. Dead-end roadway shown in the northern end of the plat requires a full 90-foot cul-de-sac turnaround per city street ordinance. 4. Main entry roadway, Southeast 132nd Street off of 148th Avenue Southeast shows a divided roadway. These divided roadways are required to be a minimum 20-feet width each, not the 16-feet proposed. CT:ct mplwd < III City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP, ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Bumstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152nd Avenue SE, east of 148th Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the project. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control pans shall be in compliance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The proposed development is located in the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin which has ongoing erosion problems in the down stream portions of the creek. Therefore, additional retention requirements for this project are as follows: 1. The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50%of the predeveloped 2-year, 24 —hour storm event through the 2-years storm event, with a safety factor of 10%in the detention volume. 2. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 10-year and 100-year storm event to the redeveloped rates for those vents, with a 30% safety factor for the 100-year storm event. System development charges will be required for this project at$385/per lot. Waste Water: The development will be required to install a new 12" sewer main in Nile Ave. NE. (148th Ave SE) from NE 4th St (SE 128th St) to approximately 240' south of NE 4th. The sewer mains serving the site will be sized to serve the development needs. The southerly portion of the site will require a lift station designed and constructed to meet City of Renton Standards/Codes. System development charges will be required for this project at $585/lot. This site is subject to (SAD) fees for the East Renton Interceptor and a late comer's fee for the East Renton Interceptor extension. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date burn/069 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Water Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP, ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Burnstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152°d Avenue SE, east of 148th Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Water: Water service will be provided by King County Water District#90 for this project. Plans for the water system per City of Renton Standards will be required and must meet Fire Department Standards/Codes. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Burn/069a City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: AUGUST 6, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-069-PP, ECF,V Date Circulated: July 23, 1999 Applicant: Burnstead Construction(Ron Hughes) Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Maplewood Estates Work Order No: 78535 Location: South of SE 128th Street,west of 152°d Avenue SE, east of 148th Avenue SE Site Area: Approx. 62.7 acres Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments The project will be required to install both on-site and off-site Code related Street Improvements, not limited to curb, gutter, paving, sidewalk, driveway, road drainage for the street improvements and street lighting. Minimum right-of-way width will be 42 feet with minimum of 32' wide pavement within the plat will be required. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Burn/069b ►,.....t---.Y'..^.t a".Y}s_'c..-.g or_s—n_c/,=' =...,'. ..ai_ m�_atxa�s'8'=c l�^msS.�r..�Y.P!a".,-."aS�Ai�.U.o�s 9. '.,+,G.,r.cY-- :.. ra..-.zrrT 1Ftl it 9'�. .Y[r[i•..3�^Yf.7Io'Lt'k�C'`i n�^ 2 �Y�� 'v^'�y'q^'. a+=c. ._.' K..itiff tw' ' • • • O n � • NIPr • ,.�--»--- �-�-�-: a �.--..A,..� .o.....M-..<. x � TI / N-s-pQR-7 TT4iV -�.. Project Name M4pfr tuaN E 1ci rtc 5 Project Address 5/5 d ; E 122 71151 l /u,'i l4 S f Contact Person Tc Hu hrs Address Phone Number (�ZJ ) 45 - 1 1 £X7 233 . Permit Number L U A - N q - O G Project Description 2 1$ Ior rit.(/te_ 44riiVi 10 ful .... Land Use Type: • Method of Calculation: kr Residential ❑ 1TE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail Er Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail ❑ Other • • Calculation: �01 -tv sty vca,vc( h y 7 Pt A .d 27 mn9. • 2123 Re...w avev1c c{ckl y iv 5 • fi-f 175 /Z.e,i 17(j) ( 2123) _ /5/) 225. c � . k c; C Transportation Mitigation Fee:1\) ( 5�, 225. Calculated by: '� "/ Date: 7h,/4 q Account Number: 105. 5RR. 3)80. 70. 00. Date of Payment yj City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C SON1C,CA COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 city or T APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen aE 0� PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates _ WORK ORDER NO: 78535 JUL 26 1999 LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE (fit W ING SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres l BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singe family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148` Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132nd Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132n Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ohxivoit' Q / ,r4r7.7,(„cky.t.A;c_dtf We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTER Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CANOWN,L teVC,IOFIMY COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singg,,�e family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148` Ave SE, which is located along the west boundary of the site. SE 132n Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132n Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation ,_ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 140 67 p u c-Y )5 5 u t- . Q -- Si 1(57,1 L tPtY}rvrvZ N� C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit' ded to properly assess this proposal. • No/99 Signature of Dir r or Authoriz Representative Date ROUTER Rev.10/93 I CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates,LUA-99-069,PP Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced preliminary plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document did not change all references from "Longspur"to Maplewood(Estates?). The applicant may want to consider dedicating the north 42 feet of the west 30 feet of the NW quarter of Section 14,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,which is now included as a portion of NE 4th Street(SE 128th Street),to the City for street purposes to clear up potential title concerns. The Plat Certificate for the subject properties notes that there is no deed to King County for said portion of road and King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233 does not include said portion either. Information needed for final plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number(LUA-XX-XXX-FP)and the city's land record number(LND-10-0344)on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat is different from the preliminary plat, and is unknown as of this date. Make ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Neoteric. The geometry will be checked when the ties have been made. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMOMH:\FILE.SYS\LND\10\0344\RV990730.doc IF • July 30, 1999 Page 2 Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100. Complete City of Renton Monument Cards,with reference points for right-of-way monuments. Note to whom new easements, if any, are to be granted(private or City-held). The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary review. The addresses will need to be noted on the drawing. Indicate what is set at the corners of the lots. Note if the adjoining properties are platted(give lot number and plat name)or unplatted. The property owner's signature needs to be notarized and the signature should be preceded with a certification and dedication block. Required City of Renton signatures includes the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Mayor and the City Clerk. An approval block for the city's Finance Director is also required. 1 Note that if there are restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision,they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawing and the associated document(s)are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s)for the associated document(s)will be referenced on the plat in the appropriate locations. I. Comments for the Project Manager: Note the comment above concerning the dedication of the north 42 feet of the west 30 feet of the subject property(?). Pursue with the applicant as necessary. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this preliminary review is provided for your use and information. 1 PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIONS No. 99 - ill 039' APPLICANT: )ICU «1,40-31-1= Vc-- lc Li RECEIVED FROM (date) cf 1.461"1-► Ala 9E' JOB ADDRESS:bO g1E 12f3th 1 W.s--a� 152.1..0 AVE" , »r WO# 78536 NATURE OF WORK:218 L,OU �j�-r C N4�J t=y��n LND# 10—p�44. X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY LONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP O FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 0 FRONT FOOTAGE O SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 14E305-e:1004. NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when '900b assigned by King County. -901T It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATElfC1E14TEX 41 aFblo: ZFF'C2_,Pq8) 6 cm,158.00 Cyr•) Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER " tit t-(-oU 11.r cEp1 0002 1 224.52.XUI4115t 218 4ep45.as + Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER I I-t `t" 114113POEST Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x 2.18 WA'T sizAvicE Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park PIRWlb,Mt7 I'S(w.6.-rEPtbl a"'. RC Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x a18 $ 12.-7,530.0 O Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x 218 a 83,g50.00 All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) ,Q PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ UU 41 LAL LAt) DATE a to ti to ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. r0 O Current City SDC fee charges apply to n � P- c:/tempi a te/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 o • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: oc SCW lames COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 199 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen r '''' PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 ` ' LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE JUL 2 et 1999 SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singg,,�e family�C �'s.esigent part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148` Ave SL Giglele� ' t along the west boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site. A series of internallodent roads off SE 132 Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTER Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pL, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1999 04 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 23, 1999 �i' '1''. APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction (Ron Hughes) PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen 91 ' ,, PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood Estates WORK ORDER NO: 78535 '. LOCATION: South of SE 128th Street, west of 152nd Avenue SW, east of 148th Avenue SE • Ot` / • SITE AREA: approx. .62.7 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A Qi'P SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Proposal to subdivide a 62.7 acre parcel into 218 lots for singe family residences. The north part of the site is zoned R-5 and the south part R-8. Primary access would be from 148` Ave SE, which is located along the west bosindary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132n Street provide east/west internal access. There are 8 wetlands and an intermittent stream on the site. The proposal would fill 10,150 s.f. of Category 2 wetlands and proposes to compensate at 3:1 ratio creating 36,119 sq ft. The proposal requires two variances related to five road crossings over the wetlands and stream. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i • B. PO Y-RELATED COMMENTS •, ' ' cr,:51` 7 ;, /-e3, ‘Z,,,, ,, cev,-). ./2, -) .-6.0. ze .,,,v/kize, �. C /0 e j � /.),,,,f____4, , �'a Y i )')A � i i jam)c' . . ..'t ' // ♦ /� 4 t.. -' 'ii %4 A �' ii/C 11.E - . ll C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTA. f' C' C r0 /�S • t !ate 16 /- C -gym (/-it (4k/).? A<2-Afte°,1 V-#'' *(yr-e/2 C7176$-c,if-d(At_ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed o openly assess this proposal. � i.e ,, 0976 7/301 /c?7 Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date ROUTER Rev 1O93 See . ktri- CERTIFICATION I, Pc RCcUr) , hereby certify that 2 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 1 �\ c C Signed: ., ee, ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,`in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the .30"41^ day o O 14 ti . s 6 CLA ;,r, 1 MARILYN KAMCHEFF � '� 1 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF 1 COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 1 JUNE 29,2003 A NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 22,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V APPLICATION NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Burnstead Construction proposes to subdivide approximately 62.7 acres into 218 lots for development of detached single family residences. The property is in the eastern portion of Renton and was part of a recent annexation to the City. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by second or third-growth forest. Two zoning designations apply to the site. The area north of S.E. 132nd Street(Division 1) is zoned R-5 and 74 homes are proposed. The area to the south of S.E. 132"d Street(Division 2)is zoned R-8 and 144 homes are proposed. Primary access would be from 148"h Avenue S.E. which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site in an east/west direction, connecting to the existing 152"d Avenue SE right-of- way along the east boundary of the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132"d Street would provide internal access. Eight wetland areas and an unnamed intermittent stream have been delineated on the site. The wetlands vary in size and quality. Three of the wetlands(Wetlands F,G,and H)are below the 2,200 square foot size threshold for regulation of Category 2 wetlands. These wetlands would be filled for construction of the proposal and compensatory mitigation is not required. The other wetlands on the site are narrow, linear wetlands that traverse the site in a northeast/southwest direction. These wetlands range in size from 8,976 square feet to 74,825 square feet and have been classified as Category 2 wetlands. Construction of the street network would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is proposing to create approximately 36,119 square feet of wetlands in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. The proposed wetland compensation meets the code requirement to mitigate for impacts to Category 2 forested wetlands at a ratio of 3:1. Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer width. The applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging, impacting 47,969 square feet of buffer area and replacing this with 69,240 square feet of buffer. The code allows for buffer averaging where the total required area of buffer is not reduced and where the required buffer width is not reduced by more than 50%. The applicant is reducing the required 50-foot buffer width below 25 feet and therefore a variance is required. The application includes 2 variance requests related to the five road crossings over the wetlands and intermittent stream. One variance is from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations which restricts tree cutting and land clearing within 25 feet of streams. The second variance is from Wetland Regulations. The code requires a minimum 25-foot wide buffer for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is not providing the minimum buffer width where the road crosses the wetland. The proposal includes a private developed park,Tract 1 (44,554 square feet)next to Wetland A, resulting in a large open space area through the neighborhood. The wetland buffers would provide opportunities for pedestrian trails linking open spaces on the site and connecting to the proposed King County Park to the south. An open space tract along the south • boundary of the property would provide a pedestrian access to the future park. The proposed preliminary plat would be developed in 3 separate phases. The phased areas are indicated on the preliminary plat plans. Phase 1 would be developed in the year 2000,Phase 2 in 2001 and Phase 3 in 2002. PROJECT LOCATION:south of SE 128th Street,west of 152"d Avenue SW,east of 148th Avenue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M) process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: May 5,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction Company(Ron Hughes) 1215 120th Avenue NE,#201 Bellevue,WA 98005 MAILOUT • OWNER: Burnstead Construction Company Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval,Variance(2) Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits, Final Plat Approval, Building Permits, Forest Practices Permit, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit,Hydraulic Permit Approval(HPA). Requested Studies: Storm Drainage Study,Wetland Evaluation Report,Wildlife and Habitat Evaluation Report,Traffic Report,Geotechnical Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 6th Floor, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for Tuesday,September 28,1999 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: The project site is designated Residential Rural (RR) and Residential Single Family(RSF)on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The north portion of the site (north of SE 132nd Street) is zoned Residential - 5 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-5)and 74 lots for single family homes are proposed in this area. The south portion of the site (south of SE 132nd Street) is zoned Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-8)is zoned R-8 and 144 homes are proposed. The proposal appears to comply with applicable development standards of the R-5 Zone for the north portion of the site,and with standards of the R-8 Zone for the south portion of the site. The minimum permitted lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 square feet and 4,500 square feet in the R-8 Zone. The applicant has indicated setback lines on the drawings that comply with setback standards of the applicable zones. Density: Proposed density in the R-5 Zone is 4.24 du/ac which meets the maximum allowed density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre. Proposed density in the R-8 Zone is 4.64 dwelling units per acre. The R-8 Zone allows for a minimum density of 5.0 dwelling units per net acre and a maximum density of 8.0 dwelling units. City Code permits the Reviewing Official/Zoning Administrator to reduce or waive the minimum density for reasons including lack of access or physical constraints on the subject parcel. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Not applicable. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal would be subject to the City's Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance; Zoning Code; Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance; Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations;Subdivision Regulations, Street and Utilities Standards; Parking and Loading Regulations; Wetlands Ordinance; Public Works Standards; Uniform Building Code; Uniform Fire Code; and other applicable building and construction standards. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations cited above. 1. Fire Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to$488.00 per each new single family residential parcel created. 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. (Note single family homes generally generate approximately 9.55 average weekday trips per unit.) 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to$530.76 per each new single family residential parcel that is created. 4. School Impact Mitigation Fee: Note—This fee would only apply to those homes developed in the plat that are located within the boundaries of the Issaquah School District. The fee is estimated at $2,797 per each single family home that would be located within the Issaquah School District 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Control: Implement erosion/sedimentation control measures prior to and throughout the duration of construction. Provide reports to the City's inspectors and project managers as determined through the environmental review process. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 16, 1999. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 28, 1999 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record MAILOUT • and receive additional information by mail,cons, .Rosen at(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits v comments Will automatically become a party of record and ..... notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Peter Rosen(425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Ypo�RG�`llINEWIF:'i -e'1i lq,i treq um* • - ' �. 1 Tit .. s i _ , ,1 -? 1ih(. t_ i�i r go! lii!Itir icp i ._ _ _.„ ;;��iFit4 �' s.'= NNW "� uas aar gI eYu�xmw APy „� YrC vm� s iRRltfl�1 .1 i► ryi _. i t c 1T.b 7 =llrij. z� -1 �•' 1 fit„ t , i rr- 1 .e....Y*Y ft,„,,„YWYfliC j ' abaq Lam" 6BaIRIw. d��eedl�t. a+ aiffe R►' I • M z RId l FMV w i,� 4 � iF I i y1ilti.i),'.a Mlaeei `a�tct'cay wlA �f 11 +i i 1I 3IgI€a7P Al .pih_ _ QRY ° ygasjb �7�.e'` VM NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP O. i MAILOUT NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 22,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-069,PP,ECF,V APPLICATION NAME: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Burnstead Construction proposes to subdivide approximately 62.7 acres into 218 lots for development of detached single family residences. The property is in the eastern portion of Renton and was part of a recent annexation to the City. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by second or third-growth forest. Two zoning designations apply to the site. The area north of S.E. 132nd Street(Division 1) is zoned R-5 and 74 homes are proposed. The area to the south of S.E. 132nd Street(Division 2)is zoned R-8 and 144 homes are proposed. Primary access would be from 148"Avenue S.E. which is located along the western boundary of the site. SE 132"d Street would be extended through the site in an east/west direction,connecting to the existing 152nd Avenue SE right-of- way along the east boundary of the site. A series of internal loop roads off SE 132nd Street would provide internal access. Eight wetland areas and an unnamed intermittent stream have been delineated on the site. The wetlands vary in size and quality. Three of the wetlands(Wetlands F,G, and H)are below the 2,200 square foot size threshold for regulation of Category 2 wetlands. These wetlands would be filled for construction of the proposal and compensatory mitigation is not required. The other wetlands on the site are narrow, linear wetlands that traverse the site in a northeast/southwest direction. These wetlands range in size from 8,976 square feet to 74,825 square feet and have been classified as Category 2 wetlands. Construction of the street network would require 5 wetland and/or stream crossings. Where possible, the applicant has located the crossings at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The road crossings would result in fill impacts of approximately 10,150 square feet of the Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is proposing to create approximately 36,119 square feet of wetlands in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. The proposed I wetland compensation meets the code requirement to mitigate for impacts to Category 2 forested wetlands at a ratio of S 3:1. tV Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer width. The applicant is proposing wetland buffer averaging, impacting 47,969 square feet of buffer area and replacing this with 69,240 square feet of buffer. The code allows for buffer averaging where the total required area of buffer is not reduced and where the required buffer width is not reduced by more than 50%. The applicant is reducing the required 50-foot buffer width below 25 feet and therefore a variance is required. The application includes 2 variance requests related to the five road crossings over the wetlands and intermittent stream. One variance is from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations which restricts tree cutting and land clearing within 25 feet of streams. The second variance is from Wetland Regulations. The code requires a minimum 25-foot wide buffer for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant is not providing the minimum buffer width where the road crosses the wetland. The proposal includes a private developed park,Tract 1 (44,554 square feet)next to Wetland A, resulting in a large open space area through the neighborhood. The wetland buffers would provide opportunities for pedestrian trails linking open spaces on the site and connecting to the proposed King County Park to the south. An open space tract along the south boundary of the property would provide a pedestrian access to the future park. The proposed preliminary plat would be developed in 3 separate phases. The phased areas are indicated on the preliminary plat plans. Phase 1 would be developed in the year 2000,Phase 2 in 2001 and Phase 3 in 2002. PROJECT LOCATION:south of SE 128`h Street,west of 152nd Avenue SW,east of 148th Avenue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M) process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: May 5,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 22,1999 APPLICANT: Burnstead Construction Company(Ron Hughes) 1215 120`h Avenue NE,#201 Bellevue,WA 98005 MAILOUT OWNER: Burnstead Construction Company Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval,Variance(2) Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits, Final Plat Approval, Building Permits, Forest Practices Permit, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit,Hydraulic Permit Approval(HPA). Requested Studies: Storm Drainage Study,Wetland Evaluation Report, Wildlife and Habitat Evaluation Report,Traffic Report,Geotechnical Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 6th Floor, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for Tuesday,September 28, 1999 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: The project site is designated Residential Rural (RR) and Residential Single Family(RSF)on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The north portion of the site (north of SE 13214 Street) is zoned Residential - 5 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-5)and 74 lots for single family homes are proposed in this area. The south portion of the site (south of SE 132nd Street) is zoned Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-8)is zoned R-8 and 144 homes are proposed. The proposal appears to comply with applicable development standards of the R-5 Zone for the north portion of the site,and with standards of the R-8 Zone for the south portion of the site. The minimum permitted lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 square feet and 4,500 square feet in the R-8 Zone. The applicant has indicated setback lines on the drawings that comply with setback standards of the applicable zones. Density: Proposed density in the R-5 Zone is 4.24 du/ac which meets the maximum allowed density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre. Proposed density in the R-8 Zone is 4.64 dwelling units per acre. The R-8 Zone allows for a minimum density of 5.0 dwelling units per net acre and a maximum density of 8.0 dwelling units. City Code permits the Reviewing Official/Zoning Administrator to reduce or waive the minimum density for reasons including lack of access or physical constraints on the subject parcel. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Not applicable. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal would be subject to the City's Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance; Zoning Code; Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance; Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations;Subdivision Regulations,Street and Utilities Standards; Parking and Loading Regulations; Wetlands Ordinance; Public Works Standards; Uniform Building Code; Uniform Fire Code; and other applicable building and construction standards. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations cited above. 1. Fire Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to$488.00 per each new single family residential parcel created. 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. (Note single family homes generally generate approximately 9.55 average weekday trips per unit.) 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: Equivalent to$530.76 per each new single family residential parcel that is created. 4. School Impact Mitigation Fee: Note—This fee would only apply to those homes developed in the plat that are located within the boundaries of the Issaquah School District. The fee is estimated at $2,797 per each single family home that would be located within the Issaquah School District 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Control: Implement erosion/sedimentation control measures prior to and throughout the duration of construction. Provide reports to the City's inspectors and project managers as determined through the environmental review process. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 16, 1999. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 28, 1999 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record MAILOUT . and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr. n at(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written c ents will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Peter Rosen(425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION II -6iC :I ._ WAIF--:a l ; (e - ;n '-''' . -, • -- - - .. EMI- r-- Itir Part- re P�1°i -_ ... 1 ..i 1 .. ElL;' 1 1. I IN I 01110 1 .._ loggo • rill 4- -_i if• • ig :I oie,• .t• ' ,..- .i. ram• • - I la"'.�� i a ru�suraK i A.lei �M� - I 1 i limilaporsr000r p.._ 'r d, _ NUM Itt 1 iaO I11111 ill -- " °'"y�R�RYWi'iIBY7W01ip07R:,'! :M. 1 ',illIN� E i��61Ryat R6EN!�� `[ Nif xYt�1FC': c Sa. 9 a E'er►1 ligicas.17: �RI lifil Ya c` Ia'ca.�P.aA�1_.,1 -�` ....„...... _.,.. •14A-aia. m P'el,‘*""0-•111111011 . NEIGNBORI-IOOD DETAIL MAP N MAILOUT a ... .. ............ . .... ....... ............. .. CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: /'1PLEt,.JOOj] APPLICATION NO: WA•99 • O(o9 , Pk t DEVELOPMENT ^ . CITY OF REN ::N The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Servi e Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. AY U b 1999 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCELRECEIVVD NUMBER se F AT T/ '/Jtl7 sNEE ii II� (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) _ a (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, RewALD F /yvGiiiJ , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: D City of Renton Technical Services Records MI Title Company Records ss%IIIs11Hits 0 King County Assessors Records *�PNNA GO Signed /1 Date 1-2�'9�h' ``t` NOTg �fo (A plicant) • - r 31� AU Cop� a NOTARY •9�►= �, ATTESTED: ubscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the0° t '�at, �a��la�o�tc residing at � rr) '».� on the a g day of -% °°°.° H/a5}1\N,c-";19yQ . Signed (Notary Public) ****For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAIL MARILYN_l<ANiCHEFF I,' &vJY& It. SP el reTiereby certify that notices of the pro. I9eOTA idn 4Cai -d to (City Employee) STATE OF WASHINGTON each listed property owner on �3 1419.9 COMMISSION EXPIRES .TUNE 29+,2003 Signed � .Mtjzt: k . "�1 Date: R'_ '4 NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, In and for the State of Washington residing apt ,: --(- 1 -z•, ) LOA- on the 3O1"day of , 19 i `1 Signed / 2'7 - e..y..yZ listprop.doc MARILYN HEFF REV o7/98 Mkt AIM'P OMENT EXPIRES:6-29 03 S91 2 MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 084710 0010 03 Ribera-Balko Enterpris *No Site Address* 084710 0040 07 Spoon Gary E *No Site Address* 425-228-34012 084710 0041 06 Blake Lawrence E *No Site Address* 084710 0060 02 Petersen Robert A 14639 SE 132Nd St Renton 1978 206-226-3358 084710 0080 08 Knight Ronald R/Janice *No Site Address* 084710 0081 07 Marui Shigeki *No Site Address* 084710 0085 03 Wofford William E *No Site Address* 084710 0100 04 Tarantola Joseph/Lauri 14606 SE 136Th St Renton 102305 9016 09 Ribera-Balko Enterpris *No Site Address* 102305 9193 04 Whitlock Ted P 12637 148Th Ave SE Rento 1959 206-271-04 102305 9206 09 Mcevoy Al B/Sally G 14630 SE 128Th St Renton 1920 206-271-94 112305 9004 02 J W Morrison Inc *No Site Address* 112305 9011 03 Ribera-Balko Enterpris 14832 SE 128Th St Renton 1946 112305 9015 09 Ribera-Balko Enterpris 12636 148Th Ave SE Rento 1963 112305 9018 06 Not Available From Cou 14816 SE 128Th St Renton 1931 k 112305 9020 02 Not Available From Cou *No Site Address* 112305 9030 00 Lackey Charles *No Site Address* 142305 9003 00 Rogers Mark C/Lynnette 15240 SE 132Nd St Renton 1986 425-255-31 142305 9007 06 King County *No Site Address* 142305 9020 09 Johnson Daniel S 15051 SE 128Th St Renton 1967 425-226-5015 142305 9047 08 Colony Homes Inc *No Site Address* 142305 9065 05 Bales Lp;Bales George 15217 SE 128Th St Renton 1983 206-271-222,; 142305 9068 02 Bales Lp;Bales George 15201 SE 128Th St Renton 425-226-3422 142305 9070 08 Leifer Randall D/Rosem 15311 SE 128Th St Renton 1992 142305 9071 07 King County *No Site Address* 206-296-758 ) 142305 9072 06 King County *No Site Address* 206-296-40C ) 142305 9083 03 Bales Limited Partners 13401 156Th Ave SE Rento 142305 9110 00 Bales Limited Partners *No Site Address* 142305 9117 03 Niemczyk Paul M & Coll 15320 SE 136Th St Renton 1988 425-226-071 ) 142305 9118 02 Saito Michael & Arlene *No Site Address* 206-772-340s 144260 0010 09 Sakaguchi Chikai B/Mit 15203 SE 132Nd St Renton 1975 144260 0030 05 Blood Durwood E *No Site Address* 425-255-954 ) 144260 0040 03 Lambro Thomas H;Ross L *No Site Address* 425-228-519'2 144450 0040 03 Sanchez Victoria M 14630 SE 132Nd St Renton 1963 144450 0060 08 Cox James B 14646 SE 132Nd St Renton 1966 144450 0070 06 Nu West Inc *No Site Address* 425-637-860':f 146340 0005 05 Morgan Henry C 13615 154Th Ave SE Rento 1943 425-255-746':. 146340 0005 05 Morgan Henry C 13615 154Th Ave SE Rento 1934 425-255-746. 152305 9055 06 King County *No Site Address* 943275 0070 04 Slaton Daniel B/Susan 15315 SE 133Rd Ct Renton 1996 943275 0080 02 Heerensperger Joseph A 15307 SE 133Rd Ct Renton 1996 425-228-906 , 943275 0090 00 Duff Elizabeth G 15300 SE 133Rd Ct Renton 1995 425-430-985 + 943275 0100 08 Politte Carol A;Mc Cre *No Site Address* 943275 0200 07 Leach Garry E 15308 SE 133Rd Ct Renton 1996 943275 0210 05 King County Real Prope *No Site Address* The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 2 % II O4e 13016 156th Ave . S .E . Renton , Wa . 98059 June 16 , 1999 Peter Rosen Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 S . Grady Way Renton , Wa . Citizens of the area east of Renton voted against annexation to Renton . They voted several times against sewer installation . They voted to retain Water District 90 as supplier of water , and of the installation of sewers if the necessity should arrive . Well , the power of "big money" of housing developers , the power in the hands of Renton officials to stretch the boundaries of Renton , and the Boundary Review Board that E` always seems to bow to the dreams of the city officials and never seems to consider the wishes of long time residents leaves a bad feeling in the community . Residents hate Renton! ! This letter is to ask why Renton wants to more than saturate the community with many hundred additional homes . Why must the already overcrowded streets be completely impassible . It is impossible to enter the solid lines of cars from home driveways . Children must cross the main arteries as well as the secondary roads . School bus drivers from three districts have difficulty meeting their schedules of taking children to and from school and from school activities . Plans to create two entrances on 156th Ave . S .E . to access the new communities will cause unbearable congestion on 156th Ave . S .E . Also King County Executive Ron Sims mak es his decision favoring the cities and has never checked the problems . Wetlands included in the developments in several recently ,. completed Renton developments have been filled in , and then a small pond along the roadway ditches is allowed to fulfill the "green belt" requirements . Frogs and other small water creatures have not chosen to utilize the small mud puddles . I have written many letters to officials expressing opinions about the absolutely underhanded way the decisions have been made regarding our community , but no one " in power " takes time to consider our opinions . I know that this letter will not accomplish anything . The U .S . Constitution describes the power of the people , but it seems to have been cast aside! Furthermore , we would like to know how many of the Renton staff actually lives in out community! Mrs . Harold E . Reynolds ;y Ths, CITY RENTON \\> Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1999 Mr. Ron Hughes, P.E. Burnstead Construction Company 1215— 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-99-069,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Hughes: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 31, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, September 28, 1999, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ei2A— Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record ACCEPT 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 DODDS ENGI July 21, 1999 DEI Project No. 94168 Mr. Peter Rosen Development Services City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way DEVELOPMENT PLAN;IING CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 JUL 21 1999 Subject: Maplewood Estates RECEIVED File No. 99069 PP,ECF,V. Dear Peter: We are hereby requesting a variance from Section 4-4-130 Land Clearing/Tree Cutting Regulations in the City of Renton's Development Regulations. This variance request specifically relates to Section C, Prohibited and Allowable Activities paragraph 4, Restrictions for Sensitive Areas. • 1 The preliminary platMaplewood for Ma lewood Estates calls for five separate public street crossing of class 3 streams, some of which are also associated with the linear wetlands that traverse the site. These crossings have been placed at the narrowest sections of the streams/wetlands to mitigate any impacts on the sensitive areas. We believe that this variance request and the stream crossings should be granted based on the following: a. The variance is needed due to the topography and the resultant wetland/stream features of the site. These sensitive areas are linear in shape and essentially cross the entire site in a northeast to southwest direction. The plans have been created to continue the City's modified street grid system in this part of the City to provide a series of road connections to adjoining properties and to public right-of-ways that currently abut the property. Yet, these street connections are very limited in number to reduce their impacts on the sensitive areas. Without these limited crossings, the i City's street system would not be extended in an east/west direction. In addition, crossings of this nature have been granted to other properties in the vicinity and under II identical classifications, such as at The Orchards located approximately t/2 mile to the west. b. This variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The street crossings are very limited in respect to the overall stream system and have been placed at the narrowest part of the wetland/stream system. Any impacts on the sensitive areas are being mitigated Planning•Engineering•Surveying 4205-148th Avenue NE Suite 200 Bellevue,Washington 98007 Tel.425-885-7877 Fax.425-885-7963 941681#2.doc E Mail.office@DElonline.com i 7/21/99 Mr. - —a Rosen City of____rton Pg: 2 ' through wetland creation and the stream flows are being maintained through the site. The modified grid street system will actually be beneficial to the public welfare in that alternate means of access will be available to the current and future residents of the City. There will also be improved connections,both pedestrian and vehicular,to the local institutions,parks, and services. c. The approval of this variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege since it stream crossings of this nature have been allowed throughout the City and are recognized as being necessary to provide street connectivity within neighborhoods. The City has encouraged street connections instead of a series of cul-de-sacs and dead-end road systems. The plans for Maplewood call for a blending of through streets and cul-de-sacs to provide the connectivity while limiting the impact on the sensitive areas. d. This approval is a minimum variance in that the number of crossings has been limited in number and placed at the narrowest portions of the streams/wetlands. As stated above, the plans call for a blending of through streets and cul-de-sacs to provide connections to the adjoining properties/streets and yet limit the impacts to the sensitive areas. As a result of these arguments,we do believe that this variance should be grated as part of the preliminary plat for Maplewood Estates. Please call with any comment or questions. Thank you. Sincerely, DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. r • / Craig J. Krueger Vice President- Planning cc: Ron Hughes, Burnstead Construction Elizabeth G. Duff 15300 SE 133rd Ct. Renton, WA 98059 MELOPMENT PLANNING H. 425-430-9859 ` CITY OF RENTON W. 253-404-4514 JUL 2 C 1999 RECEIVED July 18, 1999 Peter Rosen Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Rosen: Re: Maplewood Project #94168 I am writing to you regarding the Maplewood Project. I am already considered a "person of record" after speaking with C. Roy Publico, Planning Technician, and Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner regarding the project. Outlined below are my concerns and recommendations regarding the proposal. I live at 15300 SE 133rd Ct. in Renton, which is "lot 9" of the Willowbrook development (see exhibit 1). When purchasing my Home in April of 1996, one of the main requirements was to buy a Home that had a view of trees and did not directly look onto my neighbor's house. This requirement was met in my Home at Willowbrook (see exhibit 2). As you will see, the view from my deck is onto the woods (see exhibit 3) and is very tranquil. I sit out there after work and on weekends to enjoy the sound of birds in the woods and watch them fly from the trees to my bird feeder (see u exhibit 4). Also, I have seen coyotes, deer, and rabbits in the woods. These woods provide a peaceful setting for my Home and significantly increase my quality of life at Willowbrook. After reviewing the proposal for Maplewood, I am very concerned regarding the impact it will have on my Home. This proposal destroys the woods, will eliminate the birds and wildlife from the area, and will result in my Home looking directly onto a series of houses. - 2 - While I realize that Renton is looking to expand and develop some of the open areas, I would like to minimize the impact it will have on the quality of life I currently enjoy and the value of my Home. The plan proposes putting 4 homes directly behind my property. These are homes identified as 118, 119, 122, and 123 (see exhibit 5). I would like to recommend that these 4 homes be moved to other sites within the development and that the land designated for the homes be left in a natural state as a greenbelt. Although this is a change to the proposal, I feel that Burnstead Construction would benefit from the change in the following way: • The proposed homes directly behind me are alley-accessed homes which are not as desirable as homes with a private driveway. The new locations would result in the homes having private driveways. • The homes identified as 120, 121 , and 126 would be more desirable as they would then back onto a greenbelt. • The 4 lots directly behind me left in a natural state as a greenbelt could be slightly altered to contain a footpath and benches so that families living in the new development could sit in, and enjoy, the woods when out for a walk. The recommended location for 3 of the homes is identified in exhibit 6. As you will see, the recommendation is to increase the cul-de-sac by 3 homes. By slightly altering the angle of the cul-de-sac some of the open space identified as Tract F would be utilized. The recommendation for the other home would be adjacent to home 143 (see exhibit 7) and would utilize a small amount of the space identified as Tract 1- park. I feel these recommendations would benefit both parties (Burnstead Construction and myself) and result in an environmentally pleasing transition to the new development. I plan on attending the public hearing on July 27, 1999 at Renton City Hall and hope that my recommendation will be accepted. Yours truly, ezi; Elizabeth Duff II� 6-xh/A // / NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. e ___ o NERJAPPLICANT L SITE STATISTICS ,o°1y°'.°ooTMa`eAr'.,E' eTia:a AREA DI61 fl8D < OxelATEI Y D,ACRESD 25,E�1E.wAd+K11GN'6003 S CONTACT: : AN. L R IE EAM1•,4J11C IEAQ I PLMNER/EN'INEERPZURYETOR ,_ : 61MTW Tl,A)I CUING YARDS DODD6 ENOrEER6.WG ExGAVAIKN SIL'>VO C,IDK:TAIm6 4205-WAN ANE.NE.WILE 200 ,ELLEv,E.WANING,CN 66001 EYCANQLIf D1b00 QaiG TARp6 ]6T CT:0 11 ' _ GGNTAG,ORRA.J.SOJEC#R-T9Any JM /OL6W-Eng..., �_ KEVN J.v4pER2ANDDT-!woo, �+ _ nut—_ °' �� SCALE: 1' = 200' `> a" ' 1.�. T i 1 SE SHE= —• f�' 8 � - MN•LMy .,O ill. S 1 . - CZ f ♦)• R� s1AUGNRAL(ILL SLOPE 2 S • = ROAD ro ILLL NON • 16. 6.3' ! uI •. Nrox ■ " ■■■■■� IN cRamD se v &iii ■0l�� AREA OPERCAVAPFp IF A� EAB ANO BASf CEMENT CONCRETE sroEw Lx _ CEKNI CONCRETE TERRCAL CURB :6•llnp'N dP1KMA RS, •p • I III A D NEIER /MICK RSEM/ERE) O • C�a Me 01 S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS I oi`:-----. NO SCKE p I I J_ �� arifi f pWy ClIa•Ye*NOW A/SiD P[AN/Ell `' 0 l/114111 __ _ + R __ R/R w•TNT AREA IRANK ME r) R/I. 2 T� �S� �/ I . . . . �.'., S' 33' 16' 6'C6' 16' 1�-3Q3' I' Q 0 l }� l -MIX CSNENE SEE ONG[PAIENNE E CONCRETE it .1 1.r///� ; . - • L�• l W VARY x sEcndY /T0N ON'vs 98rT 1fAxAL CURB&NITER O J �� J(/ `� _ _. _.y+�- -C S.E. 132ND STREET Cl) A iii ti O1 4P* :- .r J" • NO.SCALE V 14 R 0o e�/®/ Y..d 4. IO.-y //J O%/ ) R� 6f R� ? W h�Yu J0" JO e =y / O /r L� II' 16' 16' 3 3' 2' �i /( * 4.-g� 1�3. —�3 0 0 eall11aarP -- CER N,CONCRETE RROr esrwAr TERM.NRR!NIRO CCWCRCIE SIXRALx Ca ' O00000�ott000anam� y- SECTION A-A eowe�QA�1 • r' r. d ..Y: _ 148TH AVE S.E. • z O/� (SE. 128TH ST. TO S.E. 132NO ST.) c �1 - __ _______ I/O SCALE y • ' - Jss/ I 3. �C iiF O [2 3 > 2 u •/WV CEN NE C E CCN1VETE o C O COVOK/C SOCIIALR KRnCAL CARR A NETER SHE E T Or I SECTION 15-6 TYPICAL ON-SITE ROAD SECT/ON 1 4 NO SOW/f PR A.1• 'J9410w8 • �-, atr g' • �'•'4...: :�yj, ' ' ,t ,• "1 ` ,, r r Art r., r 4-1.,. .5.. • ♦ M -. ••i - • g)(A i b ft (-2 - I ,r,' 2:..,:'''-rr' ''''s WIPP' -..... ii inn . • r al f Nit., — _ , , Yam. as 1 ... t ;Y ;c. 1 i i ♦ �'� a ns S .te 5 .4 r' ;fir fi ''7h • S:i tx •'7 . ; tt, • 6)(h i 6/ 1 -3 Y, �.T •V. - ,..4 • ram! 45Y 1 may''_ ' .. 4111 II rl 1 1 k I, i �6✓,. �_ ..•tC .+r �_- mow- • .itet v /7 It ir/Y , I. ilk A `o• wl. ^ , v .l • 4.4 �v- •. _ Ac `t At `v d • ilibmi.. 1. y p' ale • Xi6i f .9 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. • SEE Si-:EET 2 c 4 ; iIL-. .,........... ....\- -- . ............ ''. h. .............4-401101EEtH:::- i w 2.w7euRER '. ' Ill II may.-h _�:.� SCALE: 1' = 50' �[. N\ 1. ' \4 I d \ G I Tnacr. Imo. Ir;IrestiT 1 , I '\... -•'' '''. NO ....1!........,I.II I I PI-.:.•• .....1% . l'W kNk n • ,— W F.4NRA61 O/RR YDTM IP. I' �I _ / ` gY r^ f, .. —. - —�---1 :: \\A � \i ill!j { —_ / uETl.1ND E (I• N••'71Tyy1 1 77eDb. !* �___.—�.v •.� • - _ 1 J.-_-.--+•• 1 IC_ 1 \ I .I ' './ :.' Z 1 '' i \ i _ \ gg ,� 4 T ! \� I \ I • ° /I yam. .... \i� ,�I I i III `9E .:.........:1__. ____4 ...--1L I I; .i — ..."' __:, .c':-11:......**7..51.7.._ .,,,.....,... \'----' , - 4). rs.....af2—,......... ":0N\\‘ :. ' .. MINN I I _ A;__ .s 1, \i_T. _ 1 i aii--= r.=-. ..., \,... f, i \. 'o._ IIIS 1'' igr .,........ ip.-1„. . ,,„,, 1 . 4 . .....„..... ., - , /0/.":- ... ,..., / , / . ‘iii61 ., __ ___ ___ Sin, i "ET i W NM 1. �_ �t�li 1,1-fs --", -,.,.- .) e......" , rw rotes I e aw •yam c•�® fi. �� 1 / V / i .+.c.c� I 0 r.i I' `• - /� cl —n-- I �14. `�j��2_�,-- .= _ ——_ 1' i �`�� ii` _-_�et. �c eT. ? V .,! . . / ..__/# ___,./i .., .........-''... .........ft-------._....,,,-,.....„,q,x...., . i w \ $ --iti ' ' R /iro 7 I j w r.. " �-ie j _ r ��:` 1 j J V F 1�•— /— $R �`� I I. :- 7Cit'R.— y� niTKsaTrON/ ). �I ' • '� ' •_!n = t `� b j( 6 I I �': �.'.---- '/ //�IC" -- --° -- ,,, ,1 ARE / e 1!. I � 1 i as I!1 Id 1 — �j �(fca *-.1 ,,.,,p� ; / n I11, 1 ,_� , . ) j raj II ;i '1111 ' I 4.4\'-7-' f . -''' #4( I ', I% / nit,..,.• i1 _WIERS� -- / .1 .\ nuc+\7i� „ /, II s ,I 1 i _ ,„, ,, , . a • x 0 I I i' T. • �, 1,3 • i �_•� r` .:, % � � sr�1 Am../ ,'Omilin . ?` - I / 1 1 ogi ' w Iri II IX t• i k D , • ,_s___ _;-8iille - iiii .gti . . .,. --..„-, .1 Iii ,....,_......_:7147 . . , • ii ,i.—.•;:-.$ aenero c ?,f T - J/7c,/ , .y ri; il .., -P)� ` f kl. / ' I1 w 1 V. .� . : I I 3 4 SEE EET 4 OF 4 nwoac. 94168 u. B • : xh /h/./- - 6r/9,/.2a / • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE5-4EET2GF4 `I \ ° fry 41 bL . {�` ". SCALE: 1• = 50' \t _ as ..—�.. . `►��, •\ ..I ,C� \~�� fl I ^� �_«, it t a.- t \ p q. ,1 •, .�{ / 1 k—r—_,\_......._ 1 \ .. j ( ' I ram,.). ....c'.i'�a,iRI4l eV.aR 4OTw / \ I p \ .• • ,`• rrr. ' ) .,,I I ;n �y, F.,\� / 1� / i k q . / 'I I \\ ! --.. t• F a \/ , - t- 1 ‘/ \ :Er,14.-.1)%t 'T' j' /r - I.r , I , ! u , It6TLd1D E Y:,,, I `` J / r . 1 _I I i , I x , \ ., �. i i‘5y .Y JO • • I�I —....... '".---'014/,,,,,, 1/.;: ,,,, It:,„ 6, ..• ,._ . , i , ; ....4.-- E - 4 (;;.‘11. 11). -?......... ' ' , \I, .'.• . . . I I / lillim Oil lh ' �i.. \\ 4 4 :�� // / `• rE ii i 1''_ //. Ok.,..'2 - .,____----.'77-:."_.... .) „.. 1 ,,,,, ---', :..`--.:,..al (?. . -.H". -'4.4,...," ,......‘,,.. ..___,,,,,,,r...4d %,; . 1 — n � ' ` �..+�'I� �. • . , ��r./I Y /darI \,1� / I e'' LET • D /� -� -- - '! / • { / // ROOMS RAM \ I • _ Ii/ki—� QIe� '` ` ; TL J /II MAC, r , vK / / r A: 2 p Cr••V.ea` !/ l ....... . d<I • ` \.i/�% ®\ . er, i I / I� i- — R.: e �\`.,. sAO ! 111 I . / _ ___ D// -��r,r%e 'sf — ` _ I__-` ( ..k _./IF_ f_— - VQ CC* k • ' I I , / ^ `�'aG► Whe • Z 4 ►- - _ R•717 � e CI I•a d ti4.Q 't� �.� __.•� ^/ 2Y i I `, a n !. /� / :4. 6 A s ._.,. 1 • 1 1 vt l' , • A i RV(L' ,', ite tu 1,--H I�,•``i ;�Y• 11 I /a±Jhrc:,J..•v A�� p .�i� it A,C, - j i.� .'��1 j I' x �- \ ,... It i:••„ r I 0 % ' .% 7 , t 4II i I` 1111 �,-�.+ i l. 1. itt,�/�. 0� >> �,' /II;• %. — ' , 11 ryery,, /.1)T.,. .i.. 14#1 III I 3f'' 7 I . \' / , « ° �tl`.nIf i I1I ��a• i`��,1 '�( \ � r �� .1 / ` . / 1.'1., !•' I, :„-7.4:11 -i•:—--I o ,,, Q y C 3 _ / • 1.� • ail _ (� _ _r LL• •.'r}, a �� - :{ 1� IfltoO a; /I t C7 I n:,I,9 , Z t y�I I 1,I `. •_Y •yam �, / rY y •' • I I R� C O J O i 2 • ji r l 151 w r ,a i nvo c/ /f . I . l \ / O �c aa�s.A. .• �� ' ck. u. \__J1 n ;'.i non •f I y � /r?--. / O (I SmEET Er 1a r (� \` �iI\ f11II aII it IAI �...%✓� f , / I 2. •vla I / / . ' \ i» `.1 I 1 \ 1 '', 1: Al . I / 3 4 SEE SHEET 4 CF 4 'RO'•" . _ • • 2 - /2 1. 7•7/- 6 -P rc/496--ce cl . • . NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SEE 5.-EE' 2 C. a I I._ _ , / - . , \ • . . \ . . L\•••--.1.:----.....,--.„,,_ • L,-- . ., •-• • e , '4 —. . . .....,,••,, ---..• 0 - SCALE: 1 = 50 ,, ..---- - . - . -- . , .- • ‘ nut,• • - - " •• t. ! . •:L\T•••-1-'\ i ! • \_.. ..._ .....------„ , , , , . 1 , ,_ ....__ ..... - ._ 1: ....... 11 0 ) 1 \ ....... t. • I 1 r ,1 lifli: 1 I , \ _ • , - , -.;0.A riZ,1171511.1.1.1 IPT..1 17 i illaik M • . ,M ' I - ..• e . ,.. 0'f • .•. I'' ....-:' • , 4 . I .•• /''. ..../ I I.el . • F.I,/ 1 . 4 ..! -' 4.‘' ,---• -I- •---- -1-- --- i• R • , f a \ tt ...1 „.•-• .A . , $ •• . , . ' - A_ A ' \ • I 44.,..-,*-. A . , .. It " I i , s. r Atli i I , - ( .......-:•••,.. •..- -- i . .. ! .,I Ar4+1 . a / i ) tr I i /1 \ \z„, ' , $ -, .\-_14116„... 63 ..Id. .• : . ! 1 I It! / l' I • ,: -- 1 • * 1/ ' I ; ' 1 s 1.1 . ' f!' i 1 :II 1 ' • L............7.i / ..IV ) r: 1 1 • i I i I (I I ,1 1 IT 1 '1 a.••••Zy. I ..r......M.•...,044.4.4 044M, \ , ./4 ' r".°IiPOr ' 14 ti Allriff . 1 :. I I I ,/.'r- 1 4 4 1 ii. _.,..-- •--- - __.1....:••,... 1 -''' . 4 • 4.m=4.... 4 ' y f•• / 1 .,. 1 . • '. I , N.' 1, 'I f...........,........ \ A. / 4...,4 .. ....T:=. , / i r • f . , : I 1/ loft •./..- N. ) ‘• _1/4,,Ai t 1,1 1 ,.... .21 .....DE,M.11 .........,....:, ,„....,_,i \ Auk_- , 1 . \ . , \ N. -4 '. ,, --- 1 - iimv-......a in mi 1 I .,, \ ___\____::_. .- • .. ';. ... - ..'. ---- )• . . * • ,- , . , / • , 1 : —17:-.--,Itt•-••...,..„4„.......„........„............ ,t„, ,.., .'t., .It "s, ....- " .4 7/ •111 / . 1 1 ii ,,d ,I - rS ' ( r di' 4,4•4 4‘ 4.'-' I k 1 • . ; . / i ' \i -. • / '--"( /.....••,...:,"%.;- . 11 1,I •=, .c '• ) Lav>scAPI 1: ..... --' `• . I 1111V: I - * ,•‘F4';'). -.N ,-- -.1%,...44,,,,..... ...4 j. /1, ,"-- --- , . ,../ it f / ..1 1 V/ // .----. ....... GSMACK0• ••••••••.46,1 (-3 • .c .., "da.141.1 ') ' . Iwo rorrri a 'r , ' / % WM V .IC ••• _..4... 4.4 . ir•• 7 ' I .....- -.,__,.. ' . -----!'-. , 7---,-- .... _ ,e,,r... ............_ ''''' rr ....,„-el-L;7._Z...--y•-•,.. .--..-.., , _,,. 3 Q&s4e.'" AVAGGirliGliall.11.0mm.---- ______ l' t. (.) :I -±-01/1 ‘a.-.. ''A• ..r--.‘ • i •'•••"•"--- amwEE---.7,-,4GGliiW..fr4111111"..f.:=Mettri.2 -2--- flin,'•-7"---:'-1,'..-Lt. -- 1 c) ?c! k . 14 '''7 I .----- 4-•-• '' / 'V / .. -"-4--""'"---- -..-?....Viumr.valiiiW.,..--iMirtr . ,--..-'41Pi.77,--' —I—;\-_-__j_7" t; .,, - % ° I't%)'I.,.-:• 1\ g : / r...,,, . . 4...i..,....... ...„1,40,....„.„...... ..t.....,,_,,,,terrrr.............. .' " --- 1 • .4 •, 4 .4 2 i , 1 ., . ,.. 3 ,/ 'i, ..,---.4?"---4-1.-. . -= ,-.''' ',:w--...,vs-Ise...,..,...----- -:: _fi'..V.- .% . • i(A._.... ?. t owl s , 1 ..-- ... .. -....,. . ......,. - t)‘ • 1 , i/ I . \\ ft. /AWAY/ / .4,a ....„ ••'- , . - 'I.; i -( .• . :.,. N. ..7 h 7.il' — .., • MA=r ". •!• / • / ' 4 , \---41- , '''''n '' ! 0 `4 itlii „----1 .,'.....4 .". / I- '—' e.. Yr f. •---...- --1).00 le --I/10 I '• - *. 'Velgrd ) ,-711171,. 4 1 ...,,,,,.___- l' / _.t....,---\.:111-,;-. ...21..-. -4k ,, ..- 1. \„• i.. ?: .t..1 i • . . . i 1 _ , .„...i ....., 4 iff ca..-- , / - :, •,!1 614 , I I @ C t t 1 !I:in I ''` P ,.. ralla 1... I -1' / ta / 1 :. p , ,,,, 4 4%1 / 1 . .,_,T>'r,„ . VILII!tzal . i './• i ...."-- .. / -,•-•-• v. . : 1 '.;i1: t •I li ; , . ..._ . . •:. -',, • / . $ ,. rl is... ,. • • .; '4 i \-,, 1 0 ' • I ii1,-1 I : 'q..,...` ,i's 2, / / ' 1 - I -1 ,c, 041.0 V ,. , ,,, ....--a I . k ' 1. • '1 A , c &1 / i / I L! i"..1 ..;•-___,,, A ,,,, flu :II '• , I 1 Ipi„ 115....0C ,,,;__ ‘. i P•icid•il I .., .',, - . . --• - H-1 . .------0 i Av../ ;4 1/- •. 1 1 ' '01 Fo 1 g F. i . 't,' i .)g•1 ! . --...-oft. •--.---- ' / I :I/I • 1 •-, IN il ...LI . !So VI i , .- -'-----%-- /NA `,..,••"" , - ..-.,...., i ! ,/. A)1...-.1.,, - 7.- 6."...• 411.. -, , -- ;7-'1 ..:.---• 74 , _....-- li ..,.,...ri: .,••-' . I, or- 7"),, - I .0 ... , _ • • * * .4/ 're ,,,.... r , f \,4 (... ..P, . ‘ 4,, / ' ! i\N )/'' J ' ''', \ • 10 ..• -14iirc. ii,r lirt -t c's,:a,° 0,. ' , .., / . ,, , ..!, i i - 1 ; I ,,, , / / I ," ) l'`. I'-/ L-)----1. .. --,. , 7 f I I l'. 11 aa . : V. , f--- 3 4..-1-- '.-->L1 A.. . SEE togi7 4 01 4 4'140.06,MAAIM 941E18 ,--- __- _ 6xhi,ef7z 7- f/ MMa / NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.Al. ` 1 ,5 E St ET,..^F-f .tilir ........, 21ETLuvD C.../. ... „1// '' I 0.—-.!.-_i ; '1 -/eV 1 / i .'e . - ' , ' ' 1.1 : , " ' : 1! ”!I i ' .• • / 1..•. 1 b 1 I l 1 . 1 1 1 , a , e' P. .�� r(I�'1 1 . I - 1 im,•. 1 k L -J I I I 1 I b` / / `/ r ' • III S I ^/ " y N I !1 1`1. }1 r_ -, - T iF_oo or i r_---1 •1 O. r11 » RI NON 1 / I _» ,{ •I , 1 3 r • M k Al �' I. • �I'1 1 p I woe I �s L---J •"f.J L--_ / / �. Y I •1> MAC,It S ` \we V. ., I II 'f ,fir ,s+c,c n 1 I k .I,o ., Si ..J i . . .rr'••.•'7, I '' TR C a.wlla I s.M /,\� •.ru I•• i.—ii�._�I 1 I i••• / / • •.0 • •' ',• 1 4 '� , k 'I , 7 - �,f� \�I I ': •/" !'' V, / • Y I 4 1 ,aa I 4�� 1 w F r i t '1 .r`� •' 't•�.a` `,I' 1 ,---,,,--4, •✓' ` �'I •�� '. f/ •ems'• l , ...s. 9k '-r l\f �'I„_. �. �$,- 5 \/ a (. I ' • t (�` ) / ice' i / Xis ',X.?,� laap.'i I I ' '-``` » ` ` / 2.E•L4..'7 1 • " \�`� •r / \` F A i j I IiF-- -- - I • I, )�_ i ^ t.l \ 1 i •;..•. /,`. �.. • /4./I t,.s�' �e s C 4/- IL NV i s . \ \.... fr , s Iu` I I I /•w.b / \ T :t1 � / '..'� ./ _E•.u+D K # illS Fi• `�`•I. , , a a / I , JaJ I I fi / / p C` \wee.. \ I 1 I w L " w... t1Eri-, ‘N , , .. 1 `., _ 0 et gp /' ��' v 74K .. ``Y�?''� ` ,,,S'-�G .' \`am u„. L CZ `� u'.�^\4 \ .,'M oc , -'-h r--—1 1• t • •I k ' .•••; k• 1 •\ v, .or r {. 'S a /� '. y -•ma_ .I.•.e • , •, 11.{m..•I "J *or w.... ; y 'wsr '' 1' 1 • 1'^.^ w i , ` �, i�r ' ,, , 1 1 yS(� , wr.<, i j i i I i i r,:.'.. �,* I r �`%4 i Y 1 11 1.F• - 8?t I _ i[, : I I I 1 1 ,I 1' 11,,...IA ` • 11 I ° '. 2, !i I 4,i._1(.. i� / 'w, .i I N •1.1 „ 0 •0 1 11 4 Y •, t , ;� —� ' V '• n U �..�.� .-1.,. r+ n�X _. _`.`\I�, _ L."•r'_t 1'O°uJ I.•w,u I.e•„ IY.+.• 1 �.• J ••.•u ,weor''•r..or '•w,,u y .w•.as'. u `" a n EkV 1 1 I n � O . '\ ,».w tams, N woo.19,U • �, w • • e 1 •..11 Or .. an•t K I v ., .. • �L�13iTH 6T. SCALE:`,:" = 50' • .. I — 4 4 I .. alias _ _ __._.t t, A /-1 i b it '/ - p r 0 poss e q' . . • _ NW 1/4 SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N. RGE. 5 E., W.M. 1 , . . f„_•IA!111.3-1:1E-.4.-7 , z,,,\I , ''''''`-I's /•••“ : I . • ., 1 . I, ' , Oil . ,1.1' .„......... -"- .ti IiI\•• I \/1 J ` es. , •__, ' 1}1 . ., i •• .. 1 I I ...;\-L, : .:'' .—- I • 1 .. .-1 ''--- ----. ! r ,.,- r• 2 L tort/_i I, I I I I 0 / i / .' a• . ., , i ' I % . . ; 2 I..,„„_, : "I. I 2 'I..:',i • 1 k i- — ..,.j 1 •••••• I i r••------I , 21 . I' I 44BI OP I I.... I I 1. I.II i. 1 I •000 to I. , -...- , ,,,1 w r.,,--,, ---.J., / 4 i ruke•• %; •-N.'".". :. '`,. s'e 4 , 's : / . I 1,'''I / 1 2 I, ...„,•' . 1, 2 L.--_-I 1.":"*.--/ l----1/ „...... / ' • •1•0. '7.7"....''',,,'1 1'7.1-TR.,• C---- 1 r , ) , , 01 0) a•-/ / .• • ' , . I .1 TS 4 I ^..*--:. - "' .„ . ' ,.. A ..„. •.' ----,..,1 ,,, • , , 2 o • "' • ' ' I '1,,...es ' 'V' •:'.• ..„,___( sst , ,.., . • ... „..., ,, • • I 2. 41 , 2 -''...-. 4 4-- , ,__,0,_ , • , 1,-- • ss‘,„ ; , •••yo s• • ,• / ....„, ,se "1.4.-•. I : .. ....r •N .4. ,. I.. •-"'... >' , '-. .• .r...,.. %..% '1 , , •,..,....4 -4 ',.-1 * / '‘‘‘' s‘ • / / ; •- •, , , 2, s• , ....../. i 7, ' e•:',... .•.t' 1' i i 4,, ,•••1 SP v , _ / 40 '0, • -....,_ •, , , . , • .8..g. \ k.• : .,•, :7 • • . ,c/ s .114 ,. • \•.•• ,., . i. -ri /1...:!-..._ ••••N ! ) ...- ' ••• `. ' . , I r 1 •• •' ......- _ , •... e, \•` • • , "......„‘N • i i , \ ----,, • ....--- / ,.,,--\,,,,-•, , ,- .4 . ,, - , J1/Anns me ' '' I ‘\ , ' WETLAND / • ,\ / - • PIMA AT 44., , • I II •A a.. I \ s woo*. V , 0 / , : ILETLAND A 1,, AREA i . ...,.. I • ;t ! •,••••N, •1-.1----.•- -•-, ' \,\.......s\- ..,,,,, \- ... ....._____ • ,/ .b.„,,,..,4, •„..:•, ,.-j;_ _. s, _ • .-i:i 2 I 1 II 24 ' •‘,2. .2 • ., / . , l-i , •, (:...,„.,,, -, ._____ , ,,. • El.. , ,D ,, - ,••• 1, i oar sr 1 , ...„.Alb. • Ivo or L....---- i v \ /: /, i „„....- — ,-..... 1 t , 2,, t •- / / / \\ wE'l......0• I A- , ....... _.... `------ ' *:., ''' •/4/N4s"".--'2', ef ,,,,.-/Y _ .. ,... •I' ,'ke \ -• , • Iliki- ,..,'•'a ‘.., /..., ..,.._ ____,,,,,,• .., '1..... .._‘. `‘."- 4 • 4 r/i./ . fi! t, . ---- -- , ,...... ). . . ... I ' 4 - _,0. , .70'.-/ / ,...... ,' 1k‘• ,' „..., s A• • s,,. \ I '..'"" •• i i , . 41 ..../ .,,, • "" • • opla M > \ I Irv,o• 1 1 i / ,,... ...... ,,, -- ‘• / \ii IL. I \ \./../ ....."TRACT A , •‘‘ 411, • ,...,.P / 72\ I -, < .. • . ,--'\•‘• . \ ss • "" ('-' \, I 1 0 / / . -.. \ .... ,,,.,...,,,. ,,,,.‘ •\''''" ss sl .09 Ns, ." • i , •\ k t. , •24 , os ' • •23 ' \ ... ;,.., rK C) • ulf•0.1./00 \‘‘i. Af. , ' ‘sv ,, ) I tone. •••••• ,....oo I ...,/ k. A r 444"JON 70 1 : ....., I / I, N.,\000 I•F NIIIIft 4Y ' • .0 • .....0) 1 10 I i . ,_ I ,N. sow o• / k,..•. I 2 . ,, • 1- Y • , I ‘e• ,r ,\ .... . • 1/ s , •‘,.... ) •,‘,, • ) , 1 — .. 1 , „ETL•gkv'I ,. • ,r-...r • 111101111" , i , • , ,,.... ______ • >. p cn..;- / ) . •,;‘,.....1_ t_ ,...".,/,,' ri,..? ' ' A , I i.i: • . -. - ' - • ' • , , ; ....,14 LI a r I../ 1 i • ' • f -/ i ,..... ....•....../;/,‘ \•••••P -,.. . s /; /,,,, \ se / • N,ri, .1 , 11' --.1 I.. -. , ,•*":. .:.',,,.s. ' ,,,, _ A. SI ) ' .. ''' • i , iI.::.. 11 •• if op I ••.•• •••••••• ! .• ......... , \414,.:. , 1111.2 .6 \\ ::'47 S‘..' . ,.,,i;:‘‘...../,''''•:•• /I .., I; : I I •P ' 'r'---'-1-t r---1 .---1----; ,'--,no • - • ---- ., •• - ..,,,.,..;,! • ,1 s.- 'is • Is '• Is - " " ,,.. • , ' •;:••• 2 ---_-_ z..- (1. Z ‘L ... lur.' -4 1...lil 41 co CC , 4. F.5 i • /1 [ I./ -__. i s.,... : , •. ,, J/ -:... Ii r*:"" ; . -"I -- ! — ( ,i . ,,....„,..„----, P 1 , •••• 1 ' ,I ••••• I, • . •• u&%A/se,•sof,,.., . v\ _L ;.. r , I , ..- ... 1.4 ....'..... • - 1 I . 1 : - 11;2.1.• .' • IP ( / ./'.. 1 t i ___________, . :, •• 4*•--4.4.: ____ _'..__ w - . . ) • '?.$k-f' , I • ....../ ' . I 1 1 1 I I I 4 I . I .. _-..!•"".." it.41•••_ "._111_"'"" "'''i..1`•"'.'"'e:.: , t ' " I .— I . •>-11!"'"--;---1, — s • •• .,, .... . .. , . .71 1 • 1- .',,,. •- . .... :,...N..Nr•Ne N 00.001911/ ... ra , ... •., .r..N., .•Ne••• i •o. ye, to • 1 I MT DP 00.0. ••••••. . ......,...i 4,I,. . 'A 01 21 i SIitE I Or j";•.‘1:41g. ;•:..., 411.42 - ' . ..."7- - - . '• .'• Th>.EL136n4 T. SCALE:\l" 50' L.1.,IS,ik••K M... ••••elf Ow —---- '-- -.....,--- .---- 4 4 pe00-.00 P......0.46ER mON milerlarre — •. 94188 _ _ • - JINN f f ,6r . CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 1 1 June 18, 1999 126fr CITY RECEIVE} CLcRK'S OFFICE City of Renton `�'�✓� 200 Mill South Renton, WA 98055 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to request that I be made a Party of Record on City of Renton File Number LUA 99-069, known as Maplewood Estates. Thank you. Sincerely, LOZIER HOMES CORPORATION Teresa LeMay Land Acquisition Administrative Specialist cc: file LOZIER HOMES CORPORATION 1203 114TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST BELLEVUE,WA 98004 425•454•8690 LOZIEHC315MM FAX 425.646 8695 —_ ,7CITY 1 F RENTON ..LL I` Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 4, 1999 RECEI',Fr Superintendent's Office JUN 10 '99 Renton School District #403 300 SW 7' Street SUPERINTENu,. Renton, WA 98055-2307 Subject: Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat(File No. LUA-99-069,PP,ECF) The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for 218 lot Preliminary Plat to be located on a vacant 63-acre property with split zoning of R-5 and R-8. The property is located south of SE 128`h Street, west of 152' Ave SW, and east of 148`h Ave SE (see enclosed map). Please note, that a portion of the site is located within the Issaquah School District. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to the Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. Elementary School: Maplewood Heights Middle School: McKnight High School: Hazen Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes X No Any Comments: Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, - 1 l vilitiV9 e er Ro en DEVELOPMENT PLANNING --?)V-. Project Manager CITY OF RENTON JUN 15 1999 RECEIVED school/ /kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 • This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer jellol THE ��1-0(o9t PIS L3TJRNSTEADS Steve Bumstead Construction Company Rick Burnstead Construction Company Bumstead Construction Company DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON MAY U 71999 RECEIVED May 6, 1999 Laureen Nicolay, Associate Planner Municipal Building - 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 RE: Preliminary Plat of Maplewood - Request for Name Change Dear Laureen, Since there is already a recorded plat of Maplewood within the City of Renton, we are requesting our preliminary plat application be changed to Maplewood Estates. Hopefully this will address the concerns of the fire department and avoid potential confusion. As we proceed through the review process, the plans will be revised to reflect this name change at the appropriate time. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (425) 454-1900 extension 233. Sincerely, BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Ronald F. Hughes, .E. cc: Craig Krueger, Dodds Engineers i 1 r 11 y e ;• 1215 120th Avenue N.E., Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 425 454 1900 Fax: 425 454 4543 �: "r '� r ..CITY OF R ENTON PROPERTY OWNERCSI PROJECT IN ORMATfON Note:.;ff theress more than onejlegal owner,please attach art additional' notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: AURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. �A/'l PW�/� P'��:rt'c�' pl - PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 7/2.e ,S ifp Ls ADDRESS: 1215 12Uth Avenue NE, #201 ROndeJted on the noA h Ay SC 128th Si g on the ,south 8y SC 136th Si, Bet seen 148th Ave SC 8 152nd Ave SE. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUN�TNUMBER(S): CITY: i3pJJevue, GlA zIP: 98005 142305 - 9017 - 142305 - 9005 142305 - 9004 - 0P0 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 4 (425) 454-1900, Ext. 233 Rem iygyo RFtiTo� ✓/ APPLICANT of other than owner) od. � `� 199 PROPOSED LAND USES: i� `� NAME: Same cm oia'zgJt n Re.s i den thI COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:Re_4,icientinp Auaai on the poAL on o/ .the ,sife 14i.ch L'. nosh o/ SE 132nd Si. Re s-iden ti of e ingh y on the /zo2tion o1 the zi ch -i s ,south oL 132nd ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): No appLiroi&p CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: R-5 (Re.s.ident_ia1 Riviat) R-8 (Res.identhe Single family) TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON Not a/pLLcn�� SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Ron Hughes, R.E. 63. 77 acJte.s COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: PP i3uAnz ead Corm.tJuwction Co. 50. 14 Pti li on ADDRESS: 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: 13e�Jvvue, WA ZIP: 98005 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Y SENSITIVE AREA? Ye.s, iheizi cute 5 roiogoity 2 uaet2and s /Oea}pr/ On the ,s.iJP. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 454-1900, Er.t. 233 LEGAL DES PTION OF.PROPERTY.(Attach st_ _rate sheet if necessary) SEE 4 7ACXED EXl1I1I7 'A' TYPE OF;APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $_ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ X PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _ REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) r7CAy aane S-Qye , declare that I am (please check one) Xthe owner of the property involved in this application, _the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. *Lary ATTEST: Subscribed and swbrn tosbBtgre me, a Notary Public, in and Ploity Jane Side for ga State of res n at (Name of Owner/Representative) �rn vY ,r on fee day of tti; av (Signature• 9 wner/Repr entative) (Signet re of Notary Pu lic) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number A AAD ESP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H ECF LLA MHP FPUD FOR RVMP SA-A SA-H SHPL-A SHP -II SF SN[ : SME TP V-A -B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $„9,5ea eo TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ t .5t5 MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 EXHIBIT A MAPLEWOOD Legal Description PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 0 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP • 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE I NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND • EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. • l IGI Environmental Checklist A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Maplewood 2. Name of applicant: Burnstead Construction Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: OP��N�O� Ron Hughes, P.E. ( Burnstead Construction Company) ITG0 Oft 13% 1215 120th Avenue N.E., Suite#201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 454-1900 ext 233Ce �� 4. Date checklist prepared: Cj` April 23, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will begin as soon as the required permits& approvals are issued. It is estimated that this could occur during the summer of 2000. Plat improvements would be completed in the Fall of 2000. Construction of single family homes would begin late in 2000, with toal build out complete within approximately five years. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Burnstead Construction Co. owns a 10 acre parcel on the eastside which is in King County. This parcel will be provided access with the extension of S.E. 135th Street within the plat of Maplewood. This parcel will be developed once home sales within Maplewood are well along. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Storm Drainage Study prepared by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 1i Wildlife & Habitat Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. Traffic Report prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. Geotechnical Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 1 Environmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Thershold Determination City of Renton Preliminary and Final Plat City of Renton Clearing and Grading Permits City of Renton Roadway & Storm Drainage Plan Approval City of Renton Sewer Extension Approval City of Renton Water Extension Approval Water District 90 Forest Practice Application Dept. of Natural Resources NPDES Permit Dept. of Ecology Building Permits City of Renton 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to subdivide the 62.7 acre site into 218 single-family residential lots with related streets, sidewalks, storm drainage, sewer and water utilities.The portion of the site north of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-5, and will have 74 lots which will be 7,200 square feet minimum in area. The remainder of the site is zoned R-8, and will consist of 144 lots with a mimimum lot area of 4,500 square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on the eastside of Renton in the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 N., Range 5 E., W.M. in King County, Washington. The site is between 148th Avenue S.E. and 152nd Avenue S.E. and is bordered on the south by S.E. 136th Street, if extended, and on the north by S.E. 128th Street. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth A. General description of the site (circle one):, flat, oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is relatively flat with slopes in the range of 2% - 8%. The site slopes in a southwesterly direction and there are some small areas where slopes exceed 10%. 2 f Environmental Checklist C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Per the Soils Conservation Service Soil Survey, soils on the site consist of the Alderwood series, gravelly sandy loam. For more detailed information, refer to the Geotechnical Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. E. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will occur for street, utility construction and on the lots to create building pads. Stripping the site will generate approximately 75,500 cubic yards of unsuitable material. The current preliminary grading plan creates 37,000 cubic yards of cut and 137,600 cubic yards of fill. By dropping the site one foot, the cut/fill quanities would be within 30, 000 cubic yards of balancing. Gravel backfill will be imported to the site for utility and street construction. The probable source is Renton Sand & Gravel. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so generally describe. Erosion of exposed soils could occur when vegetation is cleared during construction operations. A Temporary Erosion /Sedimentation Control Plan will be prepared and approved by the City prior to construction activity on site. G. About what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Streets, sidewalks, houses and driveways will cover approximately 40% of the site. H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented duringthe construction p period after City approval. The plan would include filter fabric fences, temporary construction entrance and sediment ponds. 11 I l 2. AIR A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, heavy equipment, delivery and worker's vehicles would generate exhaust emissions. Construction activity could also produce dust from exposed soils. 3 Environmental Checklist B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water trucks will be used as necessary to control dust during plat construction. 3. WATER A. Surface Water: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type, location and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Wetland conditions are present in six locations on the property. An intermittent stream with associated wetlands crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. A smaller intermittent stream is associated with two other wetland areas. All wetlands are Class 2 because of their forested vegetation. The site also contains three unregulated wetland due to their size and isolated condition, The boundaries of these wetlands have been field located and are plotted on the preliminary plat map. Please refer to the Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. for additional details. Stormwater runoff from the site flows to the Cedar River which is approximately one mile downstream. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. It is proposed to cross the wetlands at five locations as shown on the attached Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by Terra Associates. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Construction of the roadway crossings of the wetlands will require approximately 5,800 cubic yards of fill material. During site grading, the suitable material will be used for roadway fills. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None. li 4 Environmental Checklist 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. B. Ground Water: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The streets, houses, driveways and other impervious surfaces associated with the proposed development would increase both the rate and amount of strom water leaving the site. Storm water runoff will be collected in a series of catch basins and conveyed in underground pipes to an on-site detention pond.The required detention volume is 160,089 cubic feet and the allowable release rate is 2.18 cubic feet per second, (the existing 2-year peak rate). Controlled discharge from the pond will eventually discharge to the Cedar River approximately 1 mile downstream. 2. Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials are unlikely to enter ground or surface waters. Urban runoff, which contains small amounts of pollutants from motor vehicles& landscaping activities, will enter the storm drainage system. p D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. The proposed drainage control system and water quality facilities will be designed and implemented in accordance with the City of Renton standards. These standards have been developed to minimize potential surface, ground, water quality and runoff impacts. 5 Environmental Checklist 4. PLANTS A. Check or circle types of vegetation f•.und on the site: x deciduous tree: alder.,map elel 'aspen, other cottonwood x evergreen tree: ir'edar pine, other hemlock shrubs x grass x pasture crop or grain x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation (Please list) See attached Table 1 from Terra Associates B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The proposal would result in the removal of a large portion of the forested vegetation of the site with the construction of streets and homes. With the exception of roadway crossings, the wetlands will be left undisturbed and a 50 foot buffer will be provided for additional protection. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist. D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be landscaped with deciduous trees and evergreen trees. A wetland mitigation plan will be prepared to create 36,119 sq. ft. of wetlands. 5. ANIMALS A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: See attached Tab 2 from Terra Associates. Birds: hawkLheron, eagle, ongbirds other: Blackbirds,grouse, woodpecker Mammals: OeeF;j3ear, elk, beaver, other: Coyote, rodents,raccoon Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: i B. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. 6 II ifk Environmental Checklist Ci D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The majority of the existing wetlands will remain undistrubed and a 50 foot buffer provided for additional protection. Appproximately 36,119 sq. ft. of wetlands will be created. ' 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. I I Electricity will be the primary source of energy for lighting and natural gas will be the source for heating and cooking in the homes. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. if. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? t" List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The residences will meet energy conservation measures. �ll 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None. B. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along S.E. 128th Street, a principal arterial, creates some noise at the north end of the site. 7 �I j, Environmental Checklist 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During working hours, construction activities would increase the peak on-site noise levels to approximately 80-90 dBA. The completed and occupied project would result in a slightly higher ambient noise level than the undeveloped site, as is typical from the traffic, people and pets in residential neighborhoods. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activities would be limited to the period from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays for the activities that produce the highest noise levels such as heavy equipment operations. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is vacant and undeveloped. The adjacent property to the south is undeveloped, but is in the planning stages by King County to be developed as a park. The surrounding property on the west, north and east are single family homes. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. None. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? • The portion of the site north of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-5. The portion of the site south of S.E. 132nd Street is zoned R-8. F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The site is designated as Residential Rural to the north of S.E. 132nd Street and Residential Single Family to the south. G. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. 8 Environmental Checklist H. Has anypart of the site been classified as an "environmentallysensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. There are five Class 2 wetlands and three unregulated wetlands on the site. Also, associated with the wetlands are two intermittent streams. Refer to the Revised Wetland Evaluation Report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. for additional details. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Assumingan average of 2.5 peopleper household, 545 people are expected to reside in the 9 p P p p p development. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal is a single-family residential development which conforms to the City of Renton Land Use Plan and policies for the area. 9. HOUSING A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The project will create 218 single-family homes for the middle-income market. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. AESTHETICS A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is he principal exterior building material(s) proposed? House plans will conform to zoning requirements which limit heights to 30 feet. Exterior building materials would include brick, wood siding, shingles and glass. 9 Environmental Checklist B. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views would be obstructed. However, the new homes will be visible from residences adjacent to the site on the north and east. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. 61' New streets and homesites would be landscaped to include trees, shrubs, groundcover and lawns. Approximately 3.3 acres of wetlands will remain with buffer areas. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day or night would it mainly occur? Light will be produced by new homes, streetlights and motor vehicles on-site, generally in the evening hours and during winter months in the early morning hours. Motor vehicle headlights may produce some glare. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare is not expected to be a problem. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None. 12. RECREATION A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Park, Coalfield Park and Maplewood Heights Park are all located within two miles of the site. B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The plat will provide an on-site park for the use of the homwowners within the subdivision. 10 Environmental Checklist 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. TRANSPORTATION A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will have access from S.E.128th Street with the extension of 148th Avenue S.E. The internal roadway system will provide a through connection for S.E. 132nd Street from east to west. B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop. Route#111 runs along S.E. 128th Street. There is a Park and Ride lot located at the intersection of S.E. 128th Street and 164th Avenue S.E. The closest bus stop is located at 148th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 128th Street intersection. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Each house would have a minimum of two garage spaces and two driveway spaces for a total of 872 parking spaces. No parking would be eliminated. D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, public streets will be constructed within the site to access the single family lots. Street improvements will be required along 148th Avenue SE to provide access to the site from SE 128th Street. SE 132nd, which currently dead ends at the site on the west and east, will be extended through the site within a 60 foot right of way. E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. 11 Environmental Checklist F. How many weekday vehicular trips (one way) per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project will generate 2,123 trips per day. The peak volumes would occur from 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None are proposed as part of the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. New residences would contribute to an incremental need for fire, police, school, health care and city public works services. B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Taxes and fees paid by the project developer and future residences pay for or substantially offset the cost of services to neighborhoods. No additional measures are proposed. 16. UTILITIES A. Circ.leutilities currently available at the site: •lectricity atur-al s,water refuse rvice, lepl- anitary sewer, septic system, o e .Ca ble TV B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: City of Renton Water: Water District 90 Electricity & Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: U S West Cable TV: TCI Cable C. SIGNATURE I, Ronald F. Hughes, P.E., the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Rew,A07 it/U CJE$ Date: /'pJZiL 3 j fQ91 12 TABLE 1 PLANT SPE CIES OBSERVED ON-SITE SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton,Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- . Vegetated TREES Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple FACU X Alnus rubra Red alder FAC X X X Arbutus menziesii Madrone UPL X Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood FAC X X Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry FACU X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir FACU X X Pyrus malus Apple X X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X Thuja plicata Western red cedar FAC X X X Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock FACU X SHRUBS Acer circinatum Vine maple FAC X X X Corylus cornuta Hazelnut FACU X X Crataegus douglasii Black hawthorn FAC X X Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom UPL X X Gaultheria shallon Salal FACU X Holodiscus discolor Ocean-spray UPL X Ilex aquifolium English holly UPL X X Mahonia nervosa Cascade Oregon grape UPL X Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum UPL X X X Oplopanax horridum Devil's club FAC X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X X Ribes lacustre Prickly currant FAC X X Rosa gymnocarpa Baldhip rose FACU X Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry FACU X X X Rubus laciniatus Evergreen blackberry FACU X Rubus leucodermis Blackcap UPL X Rubus parvijlorus Thimbleberry FAC X Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry FAC X X X Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry FACU X X X Salix sp. Willow X Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry FACU X it l Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE ' Maplewood Renton,Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated SHRUBS (Continued) Sorb us aucuparia European mountain ash UPL X Spiraea douglasii Hardhack spirea FACW X X Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry NI X X Vaccinium parvifolium Red huckleberry UPL X X HERBS Agrostis alba Redtop FAC Agrostis tenuis Colonial bentrass FACU X Athyrium filix femina Lady-fern FAC X X Blechnum spicant Dcer-fern FAC X Carex canescens Gray sedge FACW X Carex obnupta Slough sedge OBL X Carex sp. Sedge X Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle FACU X Crepis capil/aris Smooth hawksbeard FACU X Dactylis glomerata Orchardgrass FACW X ', Dicentra forniosa Bleeding heart FACU X X Digitalis purpurea Foxglove FACU X Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed FACU X Equisetum arvense Field horsetail FAC X X Equisetum telmatiea Giant horsetail FACW X Galium aparine Cleavers FACU X Galium triflorum Bedstraw FACW X Geranium robertianum Robert geranium UPL X X Geum macrophyllurn Large-leaved avens FACW X X Graminae spp. Grasses X X Luzu/a parviflora Small-flowered wood- FAC X rush Lysichitum americanum Skunk cabbage OBL X Maianthemum dilatatum False lily-of-the-valley FAC X X Montia sibirica Western springbeauty FAC X Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW X Plantago/anceolata English plantain FAC X X Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass FAC X X Polypodium glycyrrhiza Licorice-fern UPL X Polystichum munitum Sword-fern FACU X X X Pteridium aquilinum Bracken-fern FACU X X Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup FACW X X Solanum du/camara European bittersweet FAC X Stachys cooleyi Cooley's hedge-nettle FACW X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton, Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated HERBS (Continued) Taraxacum officinale Common dandelion FACU X X Tolmiea menziesii Pi -a-backplant FAC X X Trillium ovatum Western trillium FACU X Urtica dioica Stinging nettle FAC X X Vicia americana American vetch FAC X • Wetland Indicator Status: OBL - Obligate wetland species, occur almost always(estimated> 99%)under natural conditions in wetlands. 11 FACW- Facultative wetland species, usually occur in wetland (estimated 67 %to 99%),but occasionally found in non-wetland. FAC - Facultative species, equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands(estimated 34%to 66%). FACU - Facultative upland species, usually occur in non-wetlands(estimated 67%to 99 %)but occasionally found in wetlands(estimated 1 %to 33 %) UPL - Upland species, occur almost always(estimated>99%)under natural conditions in non-wetlands. NI - No indicator status assigned. Project No. T-2798 TABLE 2 ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- ' Vegetated AMPHIBIANS Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile X X Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum X X Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa X Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii X W.Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum X Western Toad Bufo boreas X Pacific Chorus Frog Pseudacris regilla X X Red-legged Frog Rana aurora X X REPTILES Northern Alligator Lizard Elgaria coerulea X Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis X X X W. Terrestrial Garter Snake Thamnophis elegans X X Northwestern Garter Snake Thamnophis ordinoides X X BIRDS Mallard Anas platyrhynchos X Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striates X X Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperi X Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis X X American Kestrel Falco sparverius Merlin Falco columbarius X Ruffed Grouse * Bonasa umbellus X California Quail Callipepla californica X Killdeer Charadrius vociferus X Glaucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens X Rock Dove Columba Livia X Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata X X Common Barn-owl Tyto alba X Western Screech-owl Otus kennicottii X X Great Horned Owl Bubo virginicnaus X X Barred Owl Strix varia X Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus X Common Nighthawk ** Chordeiles minor Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus X X Red-breasted Sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber X Downy Woodpecker * Picoides pubescens X X Hairy Woodpecker Picoides villosus X Northern Flicker * Colaptes auratus X X X Pileated Woodpecker * Dryocopus pileatus X X Western Wood Pewee * Contopus sordidulus X Project No. T-2798 i TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated BIRDS(Continued) i Willow Flycatcher Empidonax trailli! X X Hammond's Flycatcher Empidonax hammondii X Violet-green Swallow ** Tachycineta thalassina N.Rough-winged Swallow ** Stelgidopteryx serripennis Barn Swallow ** Hirundo rustica Steller's Jay * Cyanocitta ste/leri X X American Crow * Corvus brachyrhynchos X X X Black-capped Chickadee .* Parus atricappilus X X X Bushtit * Psaltriparus minimus X X Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta canadensis X Brown Creeper Certhia americana X Bewick's Wren * Thryomanes bewickii X X X Winter Wren Troglodytes troglodytes X Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus satrapa X Ruby-crowned Kinglet Regulus calendula X X X Swainson's Thrush * Catharus ustulatus X X American Robin * Turdus migratorius X X X Varied Thrush Ixoreus naevius X X X Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum X X X European Starling * Sturnus vulgaris X X X Solitary Vireo Vireo solitarius X Hutton's Vireo Vireo huttoni X . • Warbling Vireo Vireo gilvus X 1 Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus X X Orange-crowned Warbler Vermivora celata X X Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia X X Yellow-rumped Warbler Dendroica coronata X X X Black-throated Gray Warbler* Dendroica nigrescens X X McGillivray's Warbler Oporornis tolmie! X X Wilson's Warbler Wilsonia pusilla X X X Western Tanager * Piranga ludoviciana X Black-headed Grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus X X X Rufous-sided Towhee * Pipilo erythrophthalmus X X X Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca X X X Song Sparrow * Melospiza melodia X X X Golden-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla X White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys X Dark-eyed Junco Junco hyemalis X X X Brewer's Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus X Project No. T-2798 I TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- , Vegetated BIRDS (Continued) Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater X X X Purple Finch Carpodacus purpureus X X House Finch * Carpodacus mexicanus X X Pine Siskin Carduelis pines X X X American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis X X X Evening Grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus X X House Sparrow * Passer donresticus X 1 MAMMALS Common Opossum Didelphis virginicnia X Vagrant Shrew Sorex vagrans Dusky Shrew Sorex obscurus X Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsi X X Townsend's Mole * Scapanus townsendi X X Pacific Mole Scapanus orarius X X Little Brown Myotis ** .'Myotis loci ug us .T Yuma Myotis ** Myotis yumaensis I Long-eared Myotis ** Myotis evotis Long-legged Myotis ** Myotis volans California Myotis ** Myotis californicus Silver-haired Bat ** Lasionycteris noctivagans Big Brown Bat ** Eptesicus fuscus Hoary Bat ** Lasiurus cinereus Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagusjloridanus X Mountain Beaver * Aplodontia rufa X Townsend's Chipmunk Eutamias townsendi X Eastern Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis X Douglas' Squirrel * Tamiasciurus douglasi X Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus X • X Bushy-tailed Woodrat Neotoma cinerea X Townsend's Vole Microtus townsendi Oregon Vole Microtus oregoni X Norway Rat Rattus norvegicus X Black Rat Rattus rattus X House Mouse Mus musculus X Pacific Jumping Mouse Zapus trinotatus X Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum X Raccoon * Procyon lotor X X X Short-tailed Weasel Mustela erminea X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated MAMMALS (Continued) Long-tailed Weasel Mustela frenata X Spotted Skunk Spilogale putorius Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis X X Coyote * Canis latrans X X Red Fox Vulpes vulpes X Bobcat Lynx rufus X X Black-tailed Deer * Odocoileus hemionus X X Notes: * Species observed on-site, including visual observations,vocalizations, and indirect evidence(tracks, scat, burrows, and nests) ** These species forage aerially for insects over a variety of habitats Project No. T-2798 I I I • J [ )4 ., ri ri. 1114 7 1 i . 74 75 ^ • at' .. 1 f ,t 76 Ii ! ) 1 A 42 IV _ i - MAE ; 91 8° r ',;) Ng , . , i if / i ., 32 31 2 9i n 11 El 1 • l II'' 92 ME tor I*/ I /4iPe. , 886 ° % 53i�,� I i 5 4 ,f,1 I 1 4 /'49 • {1 ' i 3 2 \+; -1(-- 1: --,- -t i ‘ s 1141' _ i 7 1 , 1 I _ „ . --7-____ 7 !. Direct Wetland . Impact - -� 10,150 sq. ft. )XIMATE SCALE Virtual Wetland Impact 200 400 feet I 9,200 sq. ft. CONCEPTUAL WETLAND MITIGATION AND Aoyyyyr Wetland Creation Area BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN ~AMA=V36,1 19 sq. ft. Maplewood ww, Renton, Washington Proj. No.T-2798 Date 4/27/99 Figure 4 MAPLEWOOD Construction Mitigation Description In order to mitigate the impacts of site development for Maplewood on the surrounding neighborhood, the following requirements will be established for the project: Prior to the start of any construction, a Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control Plan will be prepared for review and approval by the City of Renton. This plan will show the location of temporary construction entrances for the site. The design of these entrances will use quarry rock to keep mud from being tracked onto S.E. 128th Street and also S.E. 132nd Street. Street sweepers will also be used to clean offsite roads as needed. Construction activities will be limited to the period from 7:00 a.m. till 6:00 p.m. weekdays for the heavy equipment operations that produce the highest noise levels. The majority of construction vehicles will leave the site on the north via S.E. 128th Street. Since this is a principal arterial, there will be little impacts on residential streets. During the drier summer months when construction activity could produce dust from the exposed soils, the site will be watered as needed to keep the dust at a minimum. D�CI o pM�NT OF REN ONNlNG MAY 0 1999 RFOE�� E'D 2 • CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) • �cVELO MENT p CITY OF RENT N' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) MAY 05 199 COUNTY OF KING ) RECEIVE , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 2 r/J day of Ai97Z// , 19 9" , I installed 5 public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at s.E. /3Z,sT 5r c 1.4 a7N Avc:. SL for the following project: /`fI PLEwe, g Project name S'viLNJ 7 t/40 Co� , 'f TRvc Tt on/ CO, Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapptt 'r 7 Title 4 o enton Municipal Code. l/yI Installer Signature eayeeeeri.eaI 44* SUBSCRIBED ANI rt\ , 'bN� me this day of 42.4.i , 199 • • ' =v q f,9` 9=� b cn= S E • 1 GeciC °I, NCitTrAR P4)' IC in and forthe State of Washington, i,��s9g ``%%%% riding at ►Th rr1 ,�A, /Muir% .oO ♦ 9 '•,WASHING,,,%�'My commission expires on • PUBSIGNS.DOC REV.7f98 • N ,�(j DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONSFOR ry LOpME eveREN-�pN THE PLAT OF ��f�[6WO41� Ay p 5 1999 THIS DECLARATION, made this -'-7 , day of a., , 199b,by BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Washington Corporation, EV1%t D hereinafter called "Developer",WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the real property described in Article II of this declaration and desires to create thereon a residential community with permanent landscape entry areas, and other residential amenities for the benefit of the said community; and WHEREAS, Developer desires to provide for the preservation of the values and amenities of said community and for the maintenance of said landscape areas, open spaces, and other common facilities; and, to this end, desire to subject the real property described in Article II together with such additions as may hereafter be made thereto (as provided in Article II) to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens, hereinafter set forth, each and all of which is and are for the benefit of said property and each owner thereof, and • WHEREAS, Developer has deemed it desirable for the efficient preservation of the values and amenities in said community, to create a committee to which should be delegated and assigned the powers of maintaining and administering the community properties and administering and enforcing the covenants and restrictions and collecting and disbursing the assessments and charges hereafter created; and WHEREAS, Developer has incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington, as a non-profit corporation, the LONGSPUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, for the purpose of ex ercising n aforesaid: P p i g the functions NOW, THEREFORE, the Developer declares that the real property described in Article II, and such additions thereto as may hereafter be made pursuant to Article II hereof, is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens (sometimes referred to as "covenants and restrictions") hereinafter set forth. ARTICLE I Definitions Section 1: The following words when used in this Declaration or any Supplemental Declaration (unless the context shall prohibit) shall have the following meanings: .Ewva p "Association" (a) shall mean and refer to 1r6 PTj1 HOMEOWNERS OWNERS (b) "The Properties" shall mean and refer to all such existing properties, and additions thereto, as are subject to this Declaration or any Supplemental Declaration under the provisions of Article II hereof. (c) "Common Properties" shall mean and refer to those areas of land shown on any recorded subdivision plat of The Properties and intended to be devoted to the common use and enjoyment of the owners of The Properties and shall include entry landscaping, Tract B and Tract C. (d) "Lot" shall mean and refer to any plot of land shown upon any recorded subdivision map of the Properties with the exception of common Properties as heretofore defines. (e) "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owners, whet her one or more persons or entities, of the fee simple title to any Lot or Living Unit situated upon The Properties but, notwithstanding any applicable theory of the mortgage, shall not 1 mean or refer to the mortgagee unless and until such mortgagee has acquired title pursuant to foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu of foreclosure. (f) "Member" shall mean and refer to all those Owners who are members of the Association as provided in Article III, Section I, hereof. ARTICLE II Property Subject to This Declaration: Additions Thereto Section 1: Existinq Property. The real property which is, and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, and occupied subject to this Declaration is located in King County, Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: The Plat of LONGSPUR, according to the plat recorded in Volume /!yof Plats, pages 26 thru 3v , records of King County, Washington, all of which real property shall hereinafter be referred to as H "Existing Property. " I`. 1-4 Section 2: Additions to Existing Property. Additional lands may become subject to this Declaration in the following manner: (a) Additions Upon Approval. Upon approval in writing by the Board of Directors of the LONGSPUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION as provided in its Articles of Incorporation, adjoining property may be added and be subject to the jurisdiction of the LONGSPUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. (b) Mergers. Upon a merger or consolidation of the Association with another association as provided in its Articles of Incorporation, its properties, rights and obligations may, by operation of law, be transferred to another surviving or consolidated association or, alternatively, the properties, rights and obligations of another association may, by operation of law, be added to the properties, rights and obligations of the Association as a surviving or consolidated association may administer the I' covenants and restrictions established by this Declaration within the Existing Property together with the covenants and restrictions established upon any other properties as one scheme. No such merger or consolidation, however, shall effect any revocation, change or addition to the covenants established by this Declaration within the Existing Property except as hereinafter provided. 2 ARTICLE III Residential Area Covenants Section 1: Land Use and Building Type. All building sites in the tract, excluding designated recreational areas, shall be known and described as residential building sites. No structures shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any building site other than one detached single family dwelling not to exceed two stories and a basement in height, a private garage for not more than three (3) cars, guest house, and other outbuildings incidental to residential use of the premises. All zoning and land use ordinances, rules and regulations of King County, Washington, as found in the King County Land Use Codes, shall apply to all Lots. Section 2: Building Location. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line or nearer to the side street than 10 feet to the front lot line, or nearer than 10 feet to any side street line. No building shall be located nearer than 5 feet to an interior lot line. For the purpose of this covenant, eaves, steps and open porches shall not be considered as a part of a building, provided, however, that this shall not be construed to permit any portion of a building on a lot to encroach upon another lot. When regulations of the governing jurisdiction require larger set backs they shall control. Section 3: Easements. Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on the recorded plat and over the rear five feet and the side r, two and one-half feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or T' retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility companies is responsible. Section 4: Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. Nothing shall be done or maintained on any Lot or within any Dwelling which may be or mayannoyance or become an Ii nuisance to the neighborhood or other Owners within the Property or other activity which may or does detract from the value of the Property. Section 5: Temporary Structures. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or any other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence for a period longer than fourteen (14) days. Section 6: Construction Period. Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this subdivision shall be completed as to external appearance, including finish painting, within six (6) months from the date of start of construction except for reasons beyond control in which case a longer period may be permitted, if authorized by the Architectural Control Committee. 3 � I if Section 7: Signs. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one (1) square foot, one sign of not more than five (5) square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. Political yard signs of not more than five square feet are allowed during campaign periods. Section 8: Animals and Poultry. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot except that dogs, cats or other small household animals or birds may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. Section 9: Garbage. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish or trash. Garbage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All equipment 4 for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. Section 10: Fences. No fence, wall, or hedge shall be permitted to extend nearer to any street than the minimum setback line, except that nothing shall prevent the erection of a necessary retaining wall, the top of which does not extend more than two (2) feet above the finished grade at the back of said retaining wall. Exemptions to this paragraph may be granted by the procedure specified in Article IV (Architectural Control Committee) . Section 11: Oil and Mining Operation. Oil drilling, oil development operations, refining, mining operation of any kind, or quarrying shall not be permitted upon or in any of the building sites in the tract described herein, nor shall oil wells, tanks, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any Oof the building sites covered by these covenants. Section 12: Campers, Trailers & Recreational Vehicles. ^t The keeping of a boat, boat trailer, camper, mobile home, recreational vehicle or travel trailer, cars, or similar objects, either with or without wheels,, on any parcel of property covered by these covenants is prohibited unless written permission is granted by the procedure specified in Article IV (Architectural Control Committee) providing for storage to be no less than 30 feet to the front lot line, or nearer than 30 feet to any side street line; provided, however, that such personal property or vehicle shall be adequately screened and/or within a structure either of which has been architecturally approved by provisions of Article IV. Section 13: TV Antennas. No antenna which extends more than five feet above the structure or which is greater than six feet wide or long or in diameter shall be permitted unless approved architecturally by provisions of Article IV. Section 14: Covenants Running With Land. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all persons claiming under them for a period of thirty (30) years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then-owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole t or in part. Section 15: Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damage. 4 Section 16: Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. ARTICLE IV Architectural Control Committee No building, fence, wall or other structure shall be commenced, erected or maintained upon the Properties, nor shall any exterior addition to or change or alteration therein be made until the plans and specifications showing the nature, shape, height, materials, and location of the same have been submitted to and approved in writing as to harmony of external design and location in relation to surrounding structures and topography by the Board of Directors of the Association, or by an Architectural Control Committee composed of three (3) or more representatives appointed by the Board. The initial Architectural Control Committee shall be composed of the following: BOB DURR, 1215 120th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA. 98005; JOLYN DAVIS, 1215 120th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA. 98005; MARY JANE SLYE, 1215 120th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98005. The Architectural Control Committee shall have the primary responsibility of interpreting and enforcing the rules and regulation of building and improvements subject to the procedures hereinafter set forth. The Architectural Control Committee shall adopt such reasonable and uniform rules of architectural control as the Board of Directors may prescribe, including, but not necessarily limited to the following: 1. No outbuilding or structure of any kind may be built on a platted residential lot before construction of a permanent residence. C) 2. No construction of a dwelling may be started on a platted residential lot without first obtaining: v-1 is• (a) A building permit from the proper local governmental authority if required and, (b) Written approval from the Board of Directors of the Association or the Architectural Control Committee designated by it pursuant to Article IV of these covenants. (c) Each single family residence on a platted residential lot shall contain a minimum floor area of 1200 square feet if a one story residence, and 1500 square feet if more than a one story residence, exclusive of open decks (covered or uncovered) garages, covered carports, sheds or outbuildings. (d) Garages on platted residential lots may be detached from the main dwelling structure. However, carports must be a part of the main dwelling structure or connected to it by a roof or fence. At least two sides of a carport must be enclosed. The design and roof materials of garages and carports shall be compatible with those of the main dwelling. A majority of the committee may designate a representative to act for it. In the event of death or resignation of any member of wi the committee, the remaining members shall have full authority to designate a successor. Neither the members of the committee nor its designated representative shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. 5 11 , f The committee's approval or disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing. The Board of Directors of the Association or the Architectural Control Committee designated by it shall determine whether any given use of a platted residential lot unreasonably interferes with any given use of a platted residential lot unreasonably interferes with an abutting owners use of his property, and such determination shall be conclusive. In the event the committee, or its designated representative, fails to approve within forty-five (45) days after plans and specifications have been submitted, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. Notwithstanding any of the above provisions to the contrary, it is intended that the initial Architectural Control Committee shall remain in office until the happening of the earlier of the following events: (a) when the Developer, BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, has completed all phases of construction and development of the plat of LONGSPUR, or (b) on the 1st day of July 2000. Upon the happening of either of the above referenced events, the authority of the Architectural Control Committee shall automatically transfer to LONGSPUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a non- profit corporation, for the designation of such new committee members as provided hereinabove by the Board of Directors of said corporation. ARTICLE V Property Rights in Common Properties GSection 1: Members' Easements of Enjoyment. Subject to ri the provisions of Section 3 below, every member shall have a right and easement of enjoyment in and to the Common Properties and such easement shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot. Section 2: Title to Common Properties. The Developer may retain the legal title to the common Properties, if any, until such time as it has completed improvements thereon and until such time as, in the opinion of the Developer, the Association is able to maintain the same, but notwithstanding any provision herein, the Developer hereby covenants, for itself, its heirs and assigns, that it shall convey the Common Properties to the Association not later than the 1st day of July 1999. Section 3: Extent of Members' Easements. The rights and easements of enjoyment created hereby shall be subject to the following: (a) The right of the Developer and of the Association, in accordance with its Articles and Bylaws, to borrow money for the purpose of improving the Common Properties and in aid thereof to mortgage said properties. In the event of a default upon any such mortgage the lender shall have a right, after taking possession of such properties, to charge admission and other fees as a condition to continued enjoyment by the members and, if necessary, to open the enjoyment of such properties to a wider public until the mortgage debt is satisfied, whereupon the possession of such properties shall be returned to the Association and all rights of the Members hereunder shall be fully restored; and (b) the right of the Association to take such steps as are reasonably necessary to protect the above described properties against foreclosure; and 6 (c) the right of the Association, as provided in its Articles and Bylaws, to suspend the enjoyment rights of any Member for any period during which any assessment remains unpaid, and for any period not to exceed sixty (60) days for any infraction of its published rules and regulations; and (d) the right of the Association to charge reasonable admission and other fees for the use of the Common Properties; and (e) the right of the Association to donate all operating and capital surpluses in excess of anticipated maintenance, replacement and capital improvement requirements to qualified public and private charitable uses; and (f) the right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of the Common Properties to any public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Members the right of the Association to sell tract B subject to retaining an easement for the entry landscaping and sign, provided that no such dedication or transfer, determination as to the purposes or as to the conditions thereof, shall be effective unless an instrument signed by Members entitled to cast two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of each class of membership has been recorded, agreeing to such dedication, transfer, purpose or condition, and unless written notice of the proposed agreement and action thereunder is sent to every Member at least ninety (90) days in advance of any action taken. ARTICLE VI Covenant for Maintenance Assessments Section 1: Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation of UJ Assessments. The Developer for each Lot owned by it within The Properties hereby covenants and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance ri of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any lsuch deed or other conveyance, be deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association: (1) annual assessments or charges; (2) special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to GO be fixed, established, and collected from time to time as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments, together with such interest thereon and costs of collection thereof as hereinafter provided, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with such interest thereon, and cost of collection thereof as hereinafter provided, shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at the time when the assessment fell due. Section 2: Purposes of Assessment. The assessment levied by the Association shall be used exclusively for the purposes of promoting the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the residents in The Properties and in particular for the improvement and the maintenance of properties, services, and facilities devoted to this purposes and related to the use and enjoyment of the Common Properties and of the homes situated upon The Properties, including, but not limited to, the payment of taxes and insurance thereon and repair, replacement, and additions thereto, and for the cost of labor, equipment, materials, management, and supervision thereof. Section 3: Basis and Maximum Annual Assessments. The initial annual assessment shall be $100 per year per Lot. From and after January,2001, the annual assessment may be increased by vote of the Members, as hereinafter provided, for the next succeeding three (3) years and at the end of each such period of three (3) years for each succeeding period of three (3) years. 7 I The Board of Directors of the Association may, after consideration of current maintenance costs and future needs of the Association, fix the actual assessment for any year at a lesser amount. Section 4: Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the annual assessments authorized by Section 3 above, the Association may levy in any assessment year a special assessment, applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction or reconstruction, unexpected repair or replacement of a described capital improvement upon the Common Properties, including the necessary fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the assent of two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of each class of Members who are voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, written notice of which shall be sent to all Members at least thirty (30) days in advance and shall set forth the purpose of the meeting. Section 5: Change in Basis and Maximum of Annual Assessments. Subject to the limitations of Section 3 hereof, and for the periods therein specified, the Association may change the maximum and basis of the assessments fixed by Section 3 hereof prospectively for any such period provided that any such change shall have the assent of two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of each class of Members who are voting in person or by proxy, at a meeting duly called for this purpose, written notice of which shall be sent to all Members at least thirty (30) days in advance and shall set forth the purpose of the meeting, provided further that the limitations of Section 3 hereof shall not apply to any change in the maximum and basis of the assessments undertaken as an incident to a merger or consolidation in which the Association is authorized to participate under its Articles of Incorporation and under Article II, Section 2 (c) hereof. v-4 Section 6: Quorum For Any Action Authorized Under Sections 4 and 5. The quorum required for any action authorized by Sections 1;'4 4 and 5 hereof shall be as follows: GO At the first meeting called, as provided in Section 4 and Section 5 hereof, the presence at the meeting of Members or of proxies entitled to cast fifty (50) percent of all the votes of each class of membership shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not forth coming at any meeting, another meeting may be called, subject to the notice requirement set forth in Sections 4 and 5, and the required quorum at any such subsequent meeting shall be one-half (1/2) of the required quorum at the preceding meeting, provided that no such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty (60) days following the preceding meeting. Section 7: Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments; Due Dates. The annual assessments provided for herein shall commence on January 1, 1998. The assessments for any year, after the first year, shall become due and payable on the first day of January of said year. The due date of any special assessment under Section 4 hereof shall be fixed in the resolution authorizing such assessment. Section 8: Duties of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of the Association shall fix the date of commencement and the amount of the assessment against each Lot for each assessment period at least thirty (30) days in advance of such date or period and shall, at that time, prepare a roster of the properties and assessments applicable thereto which shall be kept in the office of the Association and shall be open to inspection by any Owner. 8 Written notice of the assessment shall thereupon be sent to every Owner subject thereto. The Association shall upon demand at any time furnish to any Owner liable for said assessment a certificate in writing assigned by an officer of the Association, setting forth whether said assessment has been paid. Such certificate shall be conclusive evidence of payment of any assessment therein stated to have been paid. The cost of preparing such a statement may be charged to the Owner requesting it. Section 9: Effect of Non-Payment of Assessment; The Personal Obligation of the Owner; The Lien; Remedies of Association. If the assessments are not paid on the date when due (being the dates specified in Section 7 hereof), then such assessment shall become delinquent and shall, together with such interest thereon and cost of collection thereof as hereinafter provided, thereupon become a continuing lien on the property which shall bind such property in the hands of the then Owner, his heirs, devises, personal representatives, and assigns. The personal obligation of the then Owner to pay such assessment, however, shall remain his personal obligation for the statutory period and shall not pass to his successors in title unless expressly assumed by them. If the assessment is not paid within thirty (30) days after the delinquency date, the assessment shall bear interest from the date of delinquency at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum, and the Association may bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same or to foreclose the lien against the property, and there shall be added to the amount of such assessment the cost of preparing and filing the complaint in such action, and in the event a judgment is obtained, such judgment shall include interest on the assessment as above provided and a cC reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court together with r-1 the costs of the action. f` Section 10: Subordination of the Lien to Mortgages. The r lien of the assessments provided for herein shall be subordinate to GO the lien of any mortgage or mortgages now or hereafter placed upon the properties subject to assessment; provided, however, that such subordination shall apply only to the assessments which have become due and payable prior to a sale or transfer of such property pursuant to a decree of foreclosure, or any other proceedings in lieu of foreclosure. Such sale or transfer shall not relieve such property from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due, nor from the lien of any such subsequent assessment. Section 11: Exempt Property. The following property subject to this Declaration shall be exempted from the assessment charge and lien created herein: (a) all properties to the extent of any easement or other interest therein dedicated and accepted by a local public authority and devoted to public use; (b) all Common Properties as defined in Article I, Section 1 hereof; (c) all properties exempted from taxation by the laws of the State of Washington, upon the terms and to the extent of such legal exemption. Notwithstanding any provisions herein, no land or improvements devoted to dwelling use shall be exempt from said assessments, charges or liens. 9 ARTICLE VII General Provisions Section 1: Duration. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by The Association, or the owner of any land subject to this Declaration, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of thirty (30) years from the date this Declaration is recorded after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless an instrument signed by the then Owners of two-thirds (2/3) of the Lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants and restrictions in whole or in part; provided, however, that no such agreement to change shall be effective unless made and recorded one (1) years in advance of the effective date of such change, and unless written notice of the proposed agreement is sent to every Owner at least ninety (90) days in advance of any action taken. Section 2: Notices. Any notice required to be sent to any Member or Owner under the provisions of this Declaration shall be deemed to have been properly sent when mailed, postpaid, to the last known address of the person who appears as Member or Owner on the records of the Association at the time of such mailing. Section 3: Enforcement. Enforcement of these covenants and restrictions shall be by any proceeding at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant or restriction, either to restrain violation or to recover damages, and against the land to enforce any lien created by these covenants; and failure by the Association or any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. CC 4-1 Section 4: Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or Court Order shall in no way affect any other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. CC T, Section 5: FHA/VA Approval. In the event there is at least one outstanding loan guaranteed by either the Federal Housing Administration or the Veteran's Administration, the following actions will require the prior approval of the Federal Housing Administration or the Veteran's Administration: Annexation of additional properties, dedication of Common Area, and amendment of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. ARTICLE VIII Amendment of Declaration Section 10.1 Amendment by Declarant or Association. During the Development Period, Declarant may unilaterally and on its sole signature amend this Declaration for the purpose of making corrections or nonsubstantial modifications. This Declaration may also be amended by an instrument executed by the Association for and on behalf of the Owners; provided however, that such amendments shall have received the prior approval of a vote of the Owners (except Declarant) having sixty-seven percent (67%) or more of the total outstanding votes in the Association; provided further, that no such amendment shall be valid during the Development Period without the prior written consent of the Declarant. No amendment to this Declaration shall replace or remove any open space area required by master plan, zoning or plat approvals for Longspur unless the relevant governmental approval is also amended by the applicable governmental authority. Section 10.2 Effective Date. Amendments shall take effect only upon recording with the King County Department of Records and Elections or any successor recording office. 10 1 BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BY nn Mary JaneLS e, President i STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF // II On this ( day &..i/ , 19 9 of in undersigned, a NotaryPublic, . before me, the g � personally appeared Mary Jane Slye, to me known to be the President of said corporation that executed the within and foregoing Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for LONGSPUR, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto°s , �r,day and year °° first above written. ;�`ZssION",,;D °o ro 9r A e Notary Public, n and for theiteo,orVagliiniton, residing at /Y? y: U8LIC �Sg81598 ,,,, o° OF ,,`�G� a°o oWASH\ cC 0 r` ri co 11 Chicago 1 iile Insurance Company Seattle Dear Ron : Enclosed please find the: DEVEclLOP-nr OF REN ON I1 Mailing Labels-Mail Address MAY 05 1999 you requested for the subject listed below: RECEIVED I 300' radius from SE 128th Property Thank you for choosing Chicago Title Company for your title and escrow needs. 0 Karen Wright Builder Information Specialist Email: Wrightk@ctt.com ® 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company Karen Wright Phone: (206)628-5647 1800 Columbia Seafirst Center Fax(206)628-5662 701 5th Avenue http://www.cticnw.com Seattle,WA 98104 THIS INFORMATION HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY: Chicago Title Insurance Company IN CONFORMING WITH THE RULES ESTABLISHED BY THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER WHO URGES YOU TO SHOP FOR THE BEST SERVICE AVAILABLE. NO GUARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABILITY ASSUMED WITH RESPECT TO THE IDENTITY OF ANY PARTY NAMED OR REFERRED TO HEREIN OR WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, LEGAL EFFECT OR PRIORITY OF ANY MATTER SHOWN THEREIN. A• qg-gZ • C MEMORANDUM • DATE: ((NI 9 (1 e TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director L )7�S SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: At 6`- i/g0P-t`‘ c-Ar) cc^JSC?`-'Cuc -) coo--x U'St O -' < LOCATION: /3P0 3 JJ< l -71^ Al/ ,S • A meeting wit the applicant has been scheduled for 0 00 , Thursday, , 0V for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to kje/y/c--fr at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 446 C my 0-5 1999 ti RECEIVED 11 �� O CITY OF RENTON U FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �` III ,` MEMORANDUM 111 •NTO DATE: October 27, 1998 TO: Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector 5 SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Maplewood/Burnstead Plat A`:4V / 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in- area. Orie fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300-feet is required. • 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $488 per single family residence. This fee is payable prior to recording of the plat. 3. The proposed roadway system is acceptable with the following exceptions. Islands in the middle of cul-de-sacs are not allowed. Cul-de-sacs are to be a minimum of 90-feet of pavement. Dead-end roadways that exceed 500-feet require that all lots beyond 500-feet be sprinklered. Dead-end roadways that exceed 150-feet require cul-de-sac turnarounds. CT:ct mplwd • it II III� I I :_ II CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT jj II MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1998 i t TO: JENNIFER HENNING 4 FROM: NEIL WATTS --' �1' SUBJECT: MAPLEWOOD/BURNSTEAD PLAT PREAPPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS I have reviewed the project submittal for the above listed project, and have the following comments at this time: SEWER • A sewer main extension is required for this project, which will include an extension of the existing main west of the site in SE 128th St (NE 4th St). This main will be a 24" main to approximately 142nd Ave SE, and an 18" main to the easterly end of the project site. The sewer mains extended into the site will probably be 8" mains. The southerly portion of the site will require a pump station to serve the lower parcels. All main and pump station improvements must be constructed per City of Renton standards. The sewer mains must be constructed within a public right-of-way, or within an easement to the City, a minimum of 15 feet in width. • The applicant will be eligible to request oversizing payment from the City for a portion of the cost of the sewer main in SE 128th St. This request will require Council action for approval. • The applicant will be eligible to request a latecomer's agreement for the costs of the sewer main in SE 128th St. This request will also require Council action for approval. • System Development Charges will be required for this project ($585 per lot). Special Assessment District fees may also be required for the East Renton Interceptor. WATER OU/L.aT This site is within the service area for water of Water District 90. NOVEMBER 2, 1998 PAGE 2 DRAINAGE • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions for detention and water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. • The proposed development is located within the drainage basin for the Maplewood Creek. There are ongoing erosion problems in downstream portions of this creek. Therefore, additional detention requirements will be recommended as a SEPA condition to address this adverse impact. The recommended detention requirement for this project is as follows: The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event. 400 Lo1- • System Development Charges will be required for this project ( . of new impervious surface) 3A- , 4 1"2 STREET IMPROVEMENTS QJ� v A-,k', A� zft • A traffic report should be prepared for this project.,,Thi limited traffic/report should address possible impacts to the signalized intersections eastand west of the site. • The new internal streets within the plat must be improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, paving, and drainage improvements for the new street improvements. Minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet, and the minimum pavement width is 32 feet. • City Code also requires similar street improvements for all adjacent right-of-ways, and additional right-of-way dedication for streets with less than 42 feet of right-of-way. These requirements may be modified or waived by the City if sufficient justification is provided. • Traffic mitigation fees of$75 per net new average daily trip ($716.25 per lot) will be required prior to the recording of the final plat for this project. GENERAL • The preliminary plat application for this project must include a conceptual utility plan showing all existing and proposed utilities, including sewer mains, manholes, water mains, valves, hydrants, drainage facilities, drainage mains and catch basins. A complete conceptual drainage plan, with a Level 1 downstream analysis and appropriate calculations for water quality treatment facilities and detention requirements shall also be included in this application. • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include a itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of NOVEMBER 2, 1998 PAGE 3 anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. I11 CITY OF RENTON A I PL NN NGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 5, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File No. 98-82 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Pre-Application Comments for Maplewood/Burnstead Construction 144-Lot Plat General. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. Zoning. The site is located outside of the City's present boundaries,but is located within an area that is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Residential Rural (RR) and Residential Single Family(RSF). The area north of SE 132nd Street is designated RR and that portion of the site south of 32nd Street is designated RSF. When this site annexes to the City,the area designated RR could be zoned Resource Conservation (RC), Residential - 1 Dwelling Unit per Acre(R-1), or Residential 5 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-5). Based on past discussions with the City Council it appears that the north portion of the site would have the R-5 Zoning assigned to it. The area designated RSF on the Comprehensive Plan Map would have R-8 zoning. R-5 Zone. The R-5 permits detached single family residential homes at densities up to 5 dwelling units per acre. No minimum density is required. Clustering of development is allowed to preserve significant natural features,provides neighborhood open space, or facilities the provision of sewer service. Cluster development is limited to a maximum of 6 lots;the maximum net density requirement of 5 dwelling units per acre shall not be exceeded, and,the area of individual lots shall not be less than 4,500 s.f. Development standards for lots less than one acre in size are as follows: lot width is required to be a minimum of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots. Required lot depth is 65 feet for lots less than one acre in size. Front yard setbacks of 15 feet for the primary structure are permitted for ,I \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUTH\PRE-APPSIMPLBRN.DOC November 4, 1998 Page 2 pp lots along new public streets. Setbacks for garages with access from the front yard street are 20 feet. The front yard setback for the primary structure may be reduced to 10 feet if all parking is provided in the rear yard o the lot with access form a public right-of-way or alley. Rear yard setbacks are required to be 20 feet. Side yard setbacks are required to be a minimum of 5 feet for interior lots, and 15 feet for corner lots. Height is limited to two stories and 30 feet for primary structures. Accessory structures are limited to one story and 15 feet in height. Lot coverage is not permitted to exceed 35%of the total lot area, unless the parcel is under 5,000 s.f. in size, in which case the lot coverage may not exceed 50%. Based on initial review, it is not clear that you are within the density requirements for R-5 zoning. We would need additional information. It appears that individual lots comply with minimum size standards. • R-8 Zone. The R-8 Zone is intended for detached single family dwellings. Development standards are as follows: minimum density 5.0 du/ac,maximum density 8.0 du/ac. Minimum lot size 4,500 s.f. Minimum lot width is 50 feet, for interior lots and 60 feet for corner parcels. The minimum lot depth is 65 feet. Setbacks are 20 feet for the front, except for lots fronting on new public streets, where the front yard setback is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for garages. Required rear yard setback is 20 feet. Side yard setbacks for interior lots are 5 feet, and for the exterior side yard on a corner lot the setback is 15 feet. Height is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet. Lot coverage is limited to 35%unless the lot is less than 5,000 s.f.,then lot coverage may not exceed 50%. From our initial review, it appears that minimum lot sizes, lot width and depth are achieved in the layout. We would need more detailed information such as lot dimensions and size. Density. For purposes of calculating density, you will need to eliminate the area of public right-of- way and wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas from the gross site area. We would need an area take-off of the wetlands and public street right-of-ways in each of the zoning designations in order to determine the net density for the site. 2. Environmental Review. The proposal requires environmental review. A geotechnical study, wetlands delineation and studyand traffic studyshould be provided. P 3. Wetlands. The wetlands located on site would be regulated by the City's Wetlands Management Ordinance. Depending on the size and type of wetland, disturbance would need to be mitigated and minimum buffer widths of 25 feet to 100 would apply. Staff would recommend establishment and recording of a Native Growth Protection Easement(NGPE) in the wetland and wetland buffer areas. Storm drainage facilities and passive recreation may be permitted in the buffer area. 4. Preliminary Plat. The proposal requires a public hearing with the City's Hearing Examiner for 11 the proposed plat. The Hearing Examiner makes a recommendation to the City Council. 11 I l 5. Schedule. Once the application is accepted as complete, it takes approximately 16 weeks to the City Council Action. This schedule depends on the concurrent annexation process. 1 cc: Jana Huerter MEMORANDUM OCT 2 gc. z9g8 • DATE: ID. /q_ ?.g TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division DJ'r t r .sue3o.O Jcol� Vl cSif l SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: a)('�-/C-' t -kt: - 7‘,LZ-17.01 LOCATION: f3zen , G-cc G /4g k— ,4f SF Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. fr Please §ubmit your written comments to \ 6) 7�r no later than I'VC / 3 . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. _ Yq _5t IS Qc�IC\NS-1`C) 17- E_510CI )TIAL. RV \\ OF SE 13L'� A r.\C7 RC5 I P CN i I n _ 61m.1 C.,L I: (7- H 1 1 IL.7' "TO T Hi: So J i 1.1 . F f'U-' � r2..E J el_ 5 Tekr - PIECE IVE H rIENEI%I T. To ( ),Jr) Ir,pre, yy, 1 of Irtr: Pr'l,,r`1CrCI' Si2.io1 S S�CY � , r"OI_1CY j�f'6'cZi E� iS ` IN 7HE L/Aruo UDC LLCYIL'lv'T d i Y1L C_c'>nnpa Hcllt5t J PM7'J I:J hS'7l T}-' G:\.."ituo i T3L C.-1 L 0L0 L 1 1-c0 G.1<<l-1c>v F\ODI i lorvFt2. IrvF .,V_:h✓-1-77ar‘i c,ry • jt1 'L /�02 OF Pu.c,20$CY) ,SY2G2 7s !j-r,Jp 7I-1C LeCTLtrrr0S OrV SI 'C NC 1'or ,c; it • il I� •� CITY 0: RENTON .ti 1.,„ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator _ • • February 2, 1999 Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Data 4- - pa$ ►os Aea /� Co t. Craig Krueger G /� ' Dodds Engineers,Inc. Primo# Pnono ree •1677 4205 - I48th Ave NE;Suite 200 Fax M Fax a Bellevue,WA 98007 Subgect: Maplewood/Burnatead Residential Project Recommended Street Improvements Dear Mr. Krueger, We have reviewed the preliminary plans for a 254 lot residential plat in the proposed Burnstead annexation area. There are several adjacent right-of-ways of various widths and levels of improvements, as well as proposed new internal public streets. This letter is to provide some clarification of what additional right-of-way dedications will be required for the project, and what street improvements will be required for the surrounding and new right-of-ways. The project is located on a 62 acre parcel bounded on the north by SE 128th St (NE 4th St), on the south by SE 136th St extended (no right-of-.way at this location),on the east by 152nd Ave SE, and on the west by 148th Ave SE, There are sever'wetlands on the property, and across several of the adjacent right-of-ways. The property to the south is proposed as a future park. The Parks Department The project will side of thisproposed does not want additional right-of-way extended on the north park. � Y 1 onprovidingsewer service to the ' Water District90 service, Cityis planning be within for water but the P S site. The City will also be assuming municipal responsibility for the drainage in the area with the annexation of the area. The following is our recommendation for street improvements and right-of-way dedications for this project. North Side-$E 12.801 St(NE 4th St)- The right-of-way width at this location is shown on some maps as 60 feet, and 84 feet on other maps. If there is only 60 feet existing right-of-way width, an additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be required to accommodate a future five lane roadway,with bike lanes and sidewalks. The project will also be required to construct curbs, gutters and sidewalks along their frontage of SE 128th St. Street lighting will be required to City of Renton's standards, and which will be owned and maintained by the City. East Side - 152nd Ave SE between SE 132nd_Stand new s• ,• ly access street to project - This existing right-of-way is 30 feet and width, and improved with pavement from SE 132nd St south to the wetland area. No access to the plat is proposed from this right-of-way. The adjacent property to the east has already been platted, with separate access via SE 132nd St to 156th Ave SE. No additional • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 right-of-way dedication or street improvements are necessary for this section right-of-way. The remaining portion of the right-of-way to the southerly access sheet is covered with wetlands. SE 132nd St eu t of the site to 156th Ave SE must be paved to a minimum of 20 feet in width to meet minimum standards for emergency access. i521td Ave SE between southerly access street to the grQject to SE 13 St -This section of right-of- way is also currently 30 feet in width. This street section is to be improved to provide access east from the project via SE 136th St. This section of 152nd Ave SE must be widened with a minimum dedication of an additional 12 feet of right-of-way. Street improvements will be required, including 32 feet of paving, curb and gutters along both sides of the street, and a. new sidewalk along the west side, and street lighting (either City or Puget system). SE 136th St must be paved from the site to 156th Ave SE to a'minimum of 20 feet in width to meet minimum standards for emergency access. South Side - SE .136th St riglit-of--wav extended - There currently is no dedicated right-of-way along the south side of this site, with SE 136th St right-of-way existing both west and east of the site. Our recommendation is to require a fence along the southerly boundary of the proposed plat,•with no—right- of-way dedication or improvements to be required. West Side - 148th Ave SE betwec SE 128th'St awl',SE 132nd St - This section of right-of-way is currently platted at 30 feet in width„aii4 will he,used as the.primary access to the subdivision. An additional 30 feet of right-of--way dedication will.be required..,Fullfstrcet improvements will be required, including 32 feet of pavement, curbs and gutters-atong both Sides; and:new sidewalk along the east side of the street. Additional pavement width may be required at the approach to SE 128th St to provide separate left-turn lane, depetldin on,the recgniendation of a traffic study for the project. Street lighting will be required for this street,to be owrle4 by the:.pity. The traffic study for the project will need to include an,anal jrsis of;the intersection of 148th Ave SE and SE 128th St. This intersection may require'a traffic signal, either as part of the project development, or as a result of cumulative development generating,additional.traffic on 148th.Ave SE in the future. The traffic report should discuss,a cost participation method for a-tc signal at this location based on proportional shares of the total turning movements at this igtetraectign. . 148th Ave SE between,SE 132nd St pnd$E 136th St-Due to.several wetland encroachments into this section of undeveloped right-of-way, no.additional dedication or improvements are recommended south of SE 132nd St. of 42 fee t inand New Internal Streets -All streets within the plat will be platted to a minimum width, a minimum of 50 feet in width for SE 132nd St. All streets will be fully improved with 32 feet of pavement, and curbs,gutters and sidewalks along both sides of the street. Cul-de-sacs will be platted to a minimum 50 foot radius, and paved to a minimum 45 foot radius. Pedestrian access will be required north of the dead-end of 150th Ave SE to SE 128th St.. Street lighting will be required, meeting lighting levels established in City Code. This internal lighting system can be designed per City standards and turned over to the City for operation and rnaintenanre, or privately constructed through Puget Sound (operated and maintained by Puget, with billing to the Homeowners Association). Additional easements or right-of-way will be needed for street lighting foundations and junction boxes, hydrants, etc. behind the back of sidewalks. 2 1 1 I' An additional street stub will be required to the property east of the proposal adjacent to SE 128th St. The City wants to discourage future street connections to SE 128th St, and expects access to this adjacent parcel to occur through this subdivision to 148th Ave SE. Please advice me of any modifications, additions or reductions which you think are appropriate for this I I project, and we can discuss whether City staff can support those requested changes. The outlined strut improvements and right-of-way dedications should be shown on future submittals for preliminary plat I and SEPA review by the City. If you have further questions,please contact me at 425-430-7278_, Sincerely, kej //LA I, Neil Watts,P.E. Plan Review Supervisor Development Services Division 11 1 oo: Gregg Zimmerman Sandra Meyer ,r-," .. ,. I' ', ., "•I rim Jana Huertnr .,, nr•,. i l • .. , .e • t I IP 1 1 i 3 • 1 1 DODDS ENGI 11 1 1 li 1 Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat— Project Narrative May 4, 1999 (Revised July 12,1999) 1 Maplewood Estates is a 62.7 acre preliminary plat located on the south side of SE 128th Street in the eastern portion of the City of Renton. The property is part of a recent annexation to the 11 City and contains two zoning categories: R-5 to the north of SE 132nd Street and R-8 to the south of SE 132nd Street. Maplewood Estates will include a total of 218 homes, with 74 I homes in Division 1 north of SE 132nd Street and 144 homes in Division 2 south of SE 132nd Street. The homes in the northern R-5 zone will feature 7200 square foot lots accessed by 11 way of a looping street or narrow private access easements. One of these access easements will allow pedestrian access to the sidewalk along SE 128th Street but will not allow vehicular - zone will feature a varietyof housing The homes in the southern R 8 access to this street. typesincluding traditional 4500 square foot lots and clusterhomes. The overall density is approximately 3.5 homes per acre. The primary access to the proposed community is from 148th Avenue SE which is located ' 132nd extended through the site in along the west boundary of the property. SE 132 Street will be g an east/west direction, will feature a landscaped boulevard entry, and will connect with the existing right-of-way at 152nd Avenue SE along the east boundary of the site. A series of loop streets will provide access to each of the homes in Maplewood Estates. The internal road system provides a stub to adjacent properties at the northwest, the northeast corner, and the southeast area. The parcel to the southeast is owned by Burnstead Construction and will be platted through King County to provide street access to 156th Avenue SE. The Maplewood Estates site includes a series of narrow Type II wetlands that traverse the site in a northeast/southwest direction. The road system and lot pattern have been created to feature these wetlands and their buffers within the community. The main entry has been located adjacent to Wetland E and SE 132nd Street meanders through the site adjacent to Wetlands A and B. The only impacts to the wetlands are for road crossings which are necessary to provide access and to maintain a modified grid layout for the overall street system. These wetland crossings have been placed at the narrow portions of the wetlands. The wetland buffers, averaging 50 feet in width, will provide several opportunities for pedestrian trails linking the community to the internal open spaces and the proposed King County Park to the south. A developed private park (Tract I)will be created adjacent to Wetland A, resulting in a large open space area through the neighborhood. An open space tract along the south boundary will provide easy pedestrian access to the future park. Per our pre-application meeting for Maplewood Estates and the response letter from Neil Watts, we are proposing to reduce the right-of-way width for the internal access roads to 44 feet. (The right-of-way for the extension of SE 132nd Street will be a minimum of 50 feet wide.) This reduction allows the creation of additional lots within the constraints of the onsite wetlands and associated buffers. The plat will be developed in three phases per the preliminary plat plans with the first phase in 2000, the second phase in 2001 and the final phase in 2002.. DEVELOPMENT11NG CITY OF RENTON 94168 Project Narrative.doc,7/21/99,page 1 JUL 21 1999 Planning•Engineering•Surveying DECEIVED 4205-148thAvenue NE Suite 200 Bellevue,Washington 98007 Tel.425-885-7877 Fax.425-885-7963 E Mail.office@DElonline.com bUKNS I tHJ LUN5I 798 PO3 MRY 03 '99 07:G t,:;;:: 9}.+:, a..�::<_�w,.:.:. ::.�f:�v;e,�...:M.wn,. i �nG1, .Ry _ •:X�`�sss.:� .'f.'1. 's �s..::k•+�n• n .�.N :��':4%" t:}•!i ' va4 'ry .aRr0«-7.,i4i .M1,a. .ig1 a s x r.�;S jt'l�Y3 ir, �..r�t^'�4 p Y + v i r4 .t; 0 v t. s v..,at o:.d7...:sYtxn.'%-PwF'n`'.: i -.rt '7'' v\. k ..s`r?0'wJ,j/ r r'^�,»s kV•'r, w I `� E' 3YI „,„.,yKiF. -s• ''°61,,a.�.y,•.„,,,,- Hv ,6,+:.aJ.' /, ,„... . i ` rFt �, ` �,�, . ',F, .rw t a •'w.,•iic p s2. 4 .ds 's.c i •.�.�^! i.u,.s°"s' I 'Y. :•. ak yti sw. r rrlelSR'3e.v.+ � .w . > ,,R".t :..:*: "a•., a„ v ".,,t n �s ,‘.,.'i 1 s ..r..a Sx:}^..^i r:�.•;Q s.aw f .t;i:fil g .�•.xw:F•W." .2»kY+.St5yr t .w y ti Y r 1;iVz iK H' vk� ::::ti `.,'. et �`� { .so,}.,six, ieA'`d�k ,e+ .,s yM � _ 11.. Yx K•wk �' ;G y�:t H ---^S ,yT'.n a L/'''(�..W� Y �.. } r r* f F:�7�"� k� f Y, s.yTF"�0 �/ 's� � za.•:s:e�-, "S'sse a. l }i... W y `` M•!rev`. u n Y .:"":�� .;,..s.s�.�3,._...•`.suY+.".''uxi....kt ..'.!.ai':�C.'......C,;P..^'....<..}xy,Yte.-...a....:.•:..:.x.... ) bt...:.�as...,�..7gf.Y9 .:w ffr�:.... .v.r:...,i=: .6. /L -- 19isl (Jvo/z77i) • i i 1 , Gross area property: 1. ��?� �d5 square feet 21 ,43� 5p (it ow) 2, Certain areas are excluded from the calculation. �� 2-74- ( lAit4iimveth These include public roadways and sensitive areas*. Total excluded area: 2. 21 Ri I i 0 square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line I for net area (or total of lot areas): 3. 79 o of l square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4, 16.11. acres 5. Number of dwelling units (d.u.) planned: 5. .77 units 6. Divide line 5 byline 4 for net density: 6. 4• 2* d.u./acre tY IJ 7 lots would result in a net density of 'Z'4' dwelling units per acre. * Sensitive areas are defined as "areas not suitable for development which are included within the City's greenbelt, geologically hazardous, it` - GPMENT tlands, or flood plain regulations." OrlyoF REN1�,'N,i;NG (City Code Section 4-31-2: Definitions JU, 2 1 1999 RECEItiED DENSITY.DOC LIVI NI l.,11_flL vs_n n..:1 I JV I CJV I Ifl. V., .0J V I 1 1 i £4 ✓ry i:.,, 4':. „en.�< rn.4it""t*;' •�. `i'.tiL=v=aire a Ye 411.1%••w..::.sv:.:. c�.� , r g wi s rr�"yii �.. ,r �' �{S�.IJ t 5 k.y n,C'`tt � v� �rM r r ar >zcv+..t ( A c ' at ...r. �'` xiae u. a..a }tn h s. / M - �`WL a s °'~ r s•.+ X i'�s";':-=. , xZ r. .�a<;;;:%%v'ire_fga:'.�Yi-««iwF%.:,wi/ F.-:•'�� .r •R::. ds't i�..l i. �`'+'fir W .mow. 4 'KTz t. .4; re:a.. a y1.. •':=• .� a r.n ~ i �'�set `x`k:�. J.w. +,7. ,i+1,r: �.•. r^P ,<xthww};• �,.:;{.•`..y..�,i.. •'".'s-' .^v� H' y�at,Rr � ;«a�a:u• �xea I. �5•rx :rs, vwn tGs�< 4' X... �!A r,.rr � y++t s�'F`�t' rt �t� ikq so-.,,t,:S 1,•- w.FL�s�r��u' �: r t a5.1� •;i>:f45i�,•i ..;azN�d.:, � 7 '� "iaR�e�� !?ree.✓.a...,,..,y.�- ' ay , .,,e / w i •Z. 6 x ,* .. r..:.. r ri .� wins s. rv�- `4,e a rh' '�adr �. `•�'�yrs r �.Lr. s,...e*•....+�.. S"• 'Y r t r r�. as.e .� r�;'b?J'd s.4<w,>.,^s,.� k t,�d'�• )%$Yk t"d....'a: „s,rK �� r ' rMU is :k >, ,. f...�...� ri;,; ,,.3.A t.,. ,es..,. ..TJ,..yvr... :.... . $ , r :v ,u74.4,44w,E:tC 1 l�..�.`Y',.s..f8....2 :p ...,v..rh.;Y�:,:;;;.ay...K+vs>r W ! {+. .s. xe• it "— /vfV ( totipt) 1 !IIL 1 1 (p(02 ?�i� 1 1 . Gross area property: 1. , / square feet 0 ow ) I (� 5I ) Z1 2. Certain areas are excluded from the calculation. i i These include public roadways and sensitive areas*, - be, 3 P LW� ) Total excluded area: 2. 3 3 qr 414° square feet I 3. Subtract line 2 from line I for net area (or total of lot areas): 3. 1137-2., 786 square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. 3‘)'•* 7 acres /4 5. Number of dwelling units (d.u.) planned: 5. l units I III 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 4: 404' d.u./acre 11 I, 'i 141 lots would result in a net density of 11-' 1v11' dwelling units per acre. 11 * Sensitive areas are defined as "areas not suitable for development which are 11 included within the City's greenbelt, geologically hazardous, wetlands, or flood 11 plain regulations." (City Code Section 4-31-2: Definitions 1I DENStTY.00C 1 THE URNSTADS Steve Burnstead Construction Company Rick Burnstead Construction.Company Burnstead Construction Company April 30, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 <Op RE: Maplewood Preliminary Plat Application C/hY FNTp F Mqy RFN74i"AI c Dear Jennifer, f� We are proposing to development a 62 acre site located on the southside of ' • Street-Ye between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. The proposed plat of Maplewo•• k,/ I create 218 lots for single family homes. Enclosed are the following documents in accordO 1.••with the submittal requirements for preliminary plat: 1. Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Signs and Flyer Box. 2. Master Application form which includes Affidavit of Ownership (11 copies & 1 original). 3. Environmental Checklist (12 copies). 4. Plat Certificate & Supplemental Commitments (3 copies including recorded easements). 5. Mailing labels for property owners within 300 feet (2 copies with self-adhesive). 6. List of Surrounding Property Owners (2 copies). i 7. Legal Documents- Proposed Restrictive Covenants (4 copies). 8. Fees- $3,000 application fee and $11.55 postage fee. 9. Preapplication Meeting Summary (5 copies). 10. Project Narrative (1 copy). 11. Construction Mitigation Description (5 copies). 12. Neighborhood Detail Map (11 copies). 13. Preliminary Plat Plan (12 copies). • r 14. Topography Map (11 copies). i` • ` 4{ f 15. Preliminary Utility (Drainage) & Grading Plan (12 copies). ` 1 1215 120th.Avenue N.E., Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 425 454 1900 Fax: 425 454 4543 16. Storm Drainage Study & Preliminary Storm Drainage Calculations (4 copies). 17. Sewer Lift Station Study (4 copies). 18. Geotechnical Report (5 copies). 19. Wetlands Evaluation Report (12 copies). �1 20. Wildlife & Habitat Evaluation (5 copies). 21. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan (4 copies). 22. Traffic Study (3 copies). 23. Plan reductions (1 copy of all plans at 8 1/2"x 11" & 1 copy of the Neighborhood Detail Map at 4"x 6"). 24. Colored Display Maps (Neighborhood Detail Map & Preliminary Plat Map). 25. King County Certificate of Water Availability (3 copies & 1 original). Please feel free to call me at (425) 454-1900 extension 233, if you have any questions or need additional information regarding this application. Sincerely, BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY £ r140 7144 Ronald F. Hughes, PE Enclosures maplepp f - ' t **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 05/05/99 09 : 08 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9901990 Amount: 11.55 05/05/99 09 : 08 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 17168BURNSTEAD Init: CRP Project #: LUA99-069 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees: 2, 511 .55 This Payment 11.55 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 511. 55 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000. 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 11.55 ill ._,?'146W /77e **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/22/99 14 : 54 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9903536 Amount : 250 . 00 07/22/99 14 :54 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #17364 BURNSTEAD Init : LN Project #: LUA99-069 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 2, 761 . 55 This Payment 250 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 761 . 55 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 1 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 05/05/99 09 : 08 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9901988 Amount: 2 , 500 . 00 05/05/99 09 : 07 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 17192BURNSTEAD Init: CRP Project: #: LUA99-069 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees: 2 , 511.55 This Payment. 2 , 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 2 , 511.55 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 30 . 0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 2 , 000 . 00 This certificate provides Department. of Health and KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Building & Land Development & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES with information necessary to lilt 3600 136TH PL SE evaluate development proposals. BELLEVUE, WA 98006-1400 (206) 296-6600 KDo not write in this b ING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Clly PNNI N x N MAY U 19 number name RFCEI V 0 Building Permit ® Preliminary Plat or PUD �rC ❑ Short Subdivision 0 Rezone or other APPLICANT'S NAME Burnstead Construction - Maplewood PROPOSED USE Residential Plat - 218 lots LOCATION Between SE 128th & SE 136th St (n-s) & between 148th Ave SE & 152 Ave SE 218 lots (Attach map & legal description if necessary) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a. ❑ Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing water main feet from the site. size OR b. Q Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ❑ (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ® (2) the construction of a distribution system on the site; and/6i ® (3) other (describe) Some offsite improvements and Developer Extension Agreement are required 2. a. a The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR b. ❑ The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a. ❑ The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR b. 0 Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a. El Water is/o/ ym4 available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 0350 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map) : Rate of Flow Duration r ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours ® 1000 gpm or more FOR 02 hours or more ❑ flow test of gpm [' other ❑ calculation of gpm (Commercial Building Permits require flow OR test or calculation) b. ❑ Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. COMMENTS/CONDITIONS Developer Extension agreement is required. There are some minor offsite improvements required as well as on site improvements. Contact District to define requirements. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. 4 KING COUNTY WATER DIST. #90 Lester Piele ,! Agency Name Signatory Name Superintendentf._ _.. '4ii9i99 Title Sign ure Date F 278 c ion LETTER OF �I' TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. TRANSMITTAL �� •'" •" • Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences TO: Mr.Peter Rosen DATE: 4/5/2000 City of Renton JOB NO.: T-2798 it 1055 South Grady Way PROJECT: Maplewood Renton,Washington 98055 II' We are sending you: Attached: J Under separate cover via: the following: Copies Date Description 2 4/2000 Wetland Mitigation Plan Remarks: cc: pot, Signed: :// 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 • Kirkland, Washington ♦ 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 CITY 3F RENTON 0 -' ,-r-a-, -IL Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,`�Mayor Fred J.Kaufman DEVELOPMENT PLANNING -- CITY OF RENTON II November 30, 1999 NOV 3 d 1999 RECEIVED Mr. Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company 1215 120th Avenue NE, #201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT FILE No. LUA-99-069,PP Dear Mr. Hughes: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval from the City Clerk, and will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, o41 -46/ Fred J. Kaufman . Hearing Examiner . FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen . Sandi Seeger,Development Services • 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 .r',I r-f---Is-o--4, i z A llak .:„„..I..0:f0,, 6,,.1.1„... 1„l' .4.''.., 4•,f ,44:::-:_ m116\1,o•..f. :I_,_,4fvt•4-,----_-r—& i _. ..sue,....... .. - - .. - - - 4 ,f___ . .", . Ffe r—tif .7__ •„1 1 ate,.4 I. z 1 l'•77-74714 f, r vf_4 , • • glitminpao Twirl_ ,4111110 a , e.. '. ----: tillitilw 'W. ,. r ‘ 7_-..ef7miLv.1 i. i ,�t��111064111—Miti �1084, 4/ , thy 11 ;, I 14%111 x - '„a____ Imi- F � r' '` "?"�T ,,, : fie n._yist-wwsio.---- , wiit ,� dit 1 '. lill f�� ]�� l r `� ill � 1mom'dm �►,r, I -•►► ,,,, I�w Ili i MINAWAir .44 „......___ ,...,/ ...1*,,__A ,,-f' - , „1-.. 402.....SAI .—v ---':,..Allir- - ' I NO --.., ;Ks.. , At ; I it Wir usireAa• tr-JArt dal 14Ni fe4,0 W 'f/s / '''''\' f -'4114:". AriPt‘ % 1 /--,,^ Nr 4,,r‘OF -- ,5L'Itil A ell 1 111- 4:41-4T-IiiiiiiiiiatiFitartaiwOe , fli '1 ,LilVi, ,,,,,-,,;:':-:), , --Aff f 0":f V.574,i ' III 0. s JP--- ;• unsiptinistir .. 1,1 r mit r ,M"")+, NI „„„.."1 A M _:::4:::::-.7--_--_- -----: ----frl 4. it I 1, . : .1014::_lb:::::::-f_ ::::f l•1 1 4, 1. ivi op f 1 9 ---1 , - vi, :„:„. r � 4`, �1r I = __ /I 2 II' I' i r --,, _ ,... 4 Ilk! l''11_ ; �,= f �► / a _tomu 17 r A ,..7 1 _,...,.. ....0- .,_ , ( ---i 1.• f g &ix, 1:- ,-- 1,,,i i i tpv4,*44,4*, 4:1114 it. ..,...„.„ ) i ih., -,, '1111,r e: isol, r ' \ ditiqVle „ 4 7 i • Yr), 4 ----;',ari*,--, . ' ? e itti 4\_i',1:,,e1" //r *.i.') e i L , *rt-t1/4 — AW-111 ›.-Irr 'S. \ i4_, "3<, 111 4' 1�11,7 LLERAND E I ,e, rig t: ii e. ii ,441(:11; sir to" • • f 411 e iff .4 *',ft. j11[10' 4" ,0 f •.4' ; 4.e It 0 0,,. t. f 0 f III[: 0 4 _,_...iiiiill i r • r s f r, ✓ a ti r o 4. f.,1 A r e 14,. r r IL -,, \‘‘, .iii4‘.1/4 1 , e. 0,...-) .. ,r f , * e f Mite tfi_E7 ' 7 4r lic 4sin '4---- -ImdMMKVMIL-'4Lr'',.......tptA'\ mak � a 1 I ;F 1------7-- t— — — ' '' -- ---- i l , Ili 1 x Wetland Buffer (50ft) at Road Crossings oN 20,710 sq. ft. —�-- Z RECEIVED APPROXIMATE SCALE % Wetland Fill for Road Construction 1' = 100' SEP 2 6 2000 / 10,150 sq. ft. Buffer Impact Area (Buffer less than 50ft) 200 0 200 400 `eet >.: 47,969 sq. ft. BUILDING D{VfSit��1 Wetland Creation Area - rwwwy AdhOW 36,119 sq. ft. Buffer Replacement Area CONCEPTUAL WETLAND MITIGATION AND ` (Buffer Greater than 50ft) BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN 69,240 sq. ft. -r-! r TERRA Maplewood '� . . ASSOCIATES Renton, Washington Ref. Preliminary Site Plan by Dodds Engineers, Inc. ' ''• .vironmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 I Date 7/19/99 I Figure 3 .i. / ________...>"•••: / i / l ,,,,. ,.. Z'N' , ...........- . , . .', \ 7 V/ / i ' .......'"' ./ ,,,...,... / .PI ' ......---". ---.. • . / i , i \ \--.... • _.....-- _____ s ( , • v , ----4?"---- 1./.. 1 z/ \----..-----7- c-----,„ ,,,I. ,,,,,,? . . , 6 ' i , ,., i ' . , \ \ \ \ "- . . ---- -I r_ _ . . . , .....„....------.,--- \ . .,.., \ / , „,., A F.Y. -. .". , '`,. t \ '',..,,,,...., t41'7 , ./ \ tlt •ti( \ k NI\ I I '--,..,._- 44-6,-,_ - \ i ---- .,,..=---7 , . , \ Nit i , ''..„ \ I '''\..,_, I id 1.....•••••••• .,' \ \ . . , \ r/ I 121 - / 61 .••••• .....-.." ---,- \ / \' .:210.••••••• ",.,...„.,,/ \ ..........._ / / y ..„,.., I 1-.•, 1 5Th .----••••-...... \ "" S.F.1 L -......,.,,,,_„..... "`,.. "--•••••,,....„., 7 ,, ‘. \L. — -....'',.........,...-' / ''N, ,,_,...„. • \ . ---, 61 HIT T UjEL.AND / IGAT•1-0N-L----, ...-----!'----- \ • ',, ,. ,Ottr-A(z... -Th's ,t \ / \ :,.. •' , ' „, 1-2 —i.-..2 1 ..,.. • F, -. ''-17,:, -.'•. &b._ IM2'6---------t,,, '" •-- - IP1-140' P ;5"_j I Al —..., 7 : i OUrimt7. 1...,. -4 _AI i • r f--.. '. ---, i I 4 ., --, --..... --' r—. (2; ...--/----- f ,..._-------442--- .,„( 1 1 6000 SRI'..0 ----- -- -— V-------------7-. 4"--I------ I 1132------A.F;-- -.. 7\_,,,,,-*/ ----*- •, so \ \ 1---------,u5--„,. ‘,.‘ .,..„. / * i ---19‘2-9-V itt‘,, z in , - ' \ \ 11 I -..• .-„... , , - '' ''7%. -- i, L... .H... .7.:". -, -4----------. .- 6 v 111 — trk ,40 /'-',-3:5... n '''',... IV/ "1.-1 , i 1- .171 - .,,.. ,_ •.•`--/-- / ' -A-7*77/0VA-t) -,, ro .. 1 r sc, st 1 131 ei/ 11 ouirtit'4, in 1 eg 0 * 33 9_ I \\. 121 (1 H c2 i , —1-- 5.F. 1 1° LU • iyl. ' e FIL. 1 L 1002 s.F.\1 UJETL,41\11)-At•-\ ' .. ,, o ___2.7. t / f ,i--. 7 CV \ i0 . CSI • iii. ,../ I V 1 /\\ ' . . ( 132 2-ts, 0 / / ,/ 1-- 14,2 N7 f , i -.„! -3, 6221 S.F. , I It) 0 I . . ....". N I , -/ 1-/' /4- — — -1 0 134 ' _J hC 1% CsI 4/ d) 1 1 1 `!. OA' / 4:1 / / 6423 5P.1 , \ / ( I 120 I t i i ...., , / i I I 2C • / A , i ( :?. \033 SP. "'44,..N. ,s4: " 120 17'— — I I i N. "‘„,135 '7,--. N, \.1 li \I ., m ,.., --....' C. p1Z-e0p00 /2. \e/ ./C?\/ /i / 7.--- 90 1 /1/1APW00P 71-7\173 JUL.24.2000 10:39PM` CORE DESIGN INC / I' vu.d4 r.� l oPssvett -- / KI iIy ,Z,.............„ 3'.y. � ,1Z� iy li u'tg — wo � i I , III II I - kae e - - _ _ — 1101 I 1 II / , ,.if,. 2a1 202 203 " I III II II /' i •.'"' _ill);1 IIIC7 / ) 1I�,k I II l I l I I I I I OPEN r C ! I �1) l 1III IIIi , tl ,�2>�1 1,I f 1 1 1 1 1 1 I....,I I I I I II II ts / > / lir\ \ E�'11 k 1+lrlC'1 .. 7-7 __l_ I I I l / 19B ...�n�_- i.-VltEafe�14_ V,� 200 • lil;11I4 205 195 '0' — — Ar � l 1111 �� 18B IIIIII 20e 1 1B� illittikie / )I1111* 90 PB IIIII %'' / r 194 r 209 102 i i 207 71-71 �_, • ,. / / , el 210 / - I / / 1B1 ) 'ff.e .�tl / ,B9 i zoo \ t/'' . -'','"s( 2 4p,4/4 1613 , 1i01411111401, fr `___ — / 1JO 4 /4/ 11114,,fl- IIit 1 4'IIIIII II IIii1,I " 1RPARK ATI /II I I I!11111111 II ,I I I I I �1r (/ 4 _ _, IIFl /N/ / I I I1 II IIIIII •4 .,,, I IIIIII1l1 -- i \ i ' ffl\\ 1��l,i' ' I ( l I iI11I11111t1 —_—__ - - I I'y I 1 \l 165 I 177 in I',.. 148 I 1 I\ ' II34 \o 6 �bi M--1 ....______. _ _ i T I 1671 1111 162 170 174in 147 t,i t 1 L C d. I. 150 14,v I •\ i T66 1_I 184• J I152 I , 145 L'---- --......— /. CT li r i mr• 12B 130 se- .�,�i a,r" • 1]2 i_ 13fi 140 141 142 143 .-'" (�,/ \\ W.oand Duffy(SOft)al Road Crossing. Nv 20,710 sq.ft. Jr .I ar Road Casstruakil R 7 Suffer Impact Area (Butler leas than SOW11 fe 47,969 sq,fl. len Area Bulls Replasamenl Area 1 I�. (Sufbr Creeler than 50f11 I' 1, / I J [ , - ,___ . . . . _. _L iig ''1 r. .,. .. f Pif ,I r ---- r `j• d f r 152ND i {- yr:" f f r f• s ,r . • 4' <4,Y �• � r ^ .. . y f , �� b ,.,_ 4, . .-_, S • • _,..,.. ,,,.. - •, , • -• 7 0-41 mi a - ( _ l e-a t < Ar t V - f i I$&rfc mo, �. r S.,, . It .04F i -- _ r; ,p40 iata_sV-- - . Pril IE A *k41_j._,.**1 -- ** .1•"-- , iir I: f"s'el 14 it. ..., ,,,,,,,,,, . _ 4 4, _...." 'V, ....../ iliirdrill dm LI .p„„...„„pixialls7 i- lc f i-litxmloN -..,. BRitiOr]{ . ,. I41F r I .r.� �� ,, iiim, iimir Mai' f f f • „ •... _...ws. . to'rc6 raj ALWA=1011. t---...: IMI[AP / • /-Nf it "°4°.44#44— 1.W4 illiiiimi MI tit WU f i ,N.70, ' , ' ok-A0 f ---411.4.. -N e t. 411tipW IF, „LISilif MU I 7. Li Mr" wit-a-switat- itstivit am_ ,. e. .. . , , ,, v. . • ,„ man mai,_ , r- iv, F.- ___ 16 ' f• 4,...: .,.dir ft"- ' f MS I II IIIIRMININdlligi �,!' '. t lk , Ar_..._:;-,__ r g r f r F II, k i' • s r \.,,,,„ ,,__:,_.:±__,::::::::::„:_:::::::: rii., e ..• ,,,,,s, ,f f gINIIK,t MI 4, IN;o, if--•-••-•::::::::::-::::: r //, e •-:-.-::-.:-.: 40,, **Imo:: \ N_::__ , wilk, MINI - % '''*-1 Pt r ::.::::- jr-7----- 6 f : i:414Vow-:.e.'•_::_44:4::::-)- ; 411400 •4.0 f *v: '11::?....13:‘‘74' 1...:,:t1..1 - I . Lit:4 \‘'.! 'a>11 :II /3 —0 _j 1.) ' 1,141- k. le:$41::- I\ie f". ,Allto..4. siVe * ? . f 4 , - Tial-f: ,,,,,if) t4H,- ikra,. X••••,-,10..., 5 , r„,;;:e '..,,,i f r,., LI ill II.. F - raw _......4:: - ...,:,-, # ,-- ----N, • 4 rr iirs,__ *r. :‘, f )/ r �.. ;1 _ .a fs r r- fi, ---0, �` .'~ o r/y��jo, .. ,s it r li . ii 0 _.,,..„.. ..., ,. • • i 0 ,,..• 7,.4.0 ' •. . . ?I ll 1111..f ' •_ s'4, f . 4frel,(I, i Thi) •1\ • f/.1i+ et' 4 - •f---......-1'; • Mal' e r r r �.., qgi____3 . .... 1 .1eAdtrie:„ e t, t \ -4 --•N' A •• 2 .--- 4, • : . t...,_) , t 4 t\\:4,/ • ,,.:• i I ,. \\ e : et ° f l' 14\ ,\•• .. ,\\ , • , . / I rff � ' x ,fIJ' ` fPr to 4.,._- I • . \ _ r � , •. Aiiik. hi1 I F I i1 i i - , T E Wetland Buffer (50ft) at RDcd Crossings 20,710 sq. ft. — � Wetland Fill for Rood Construction APPROXIMATE SCALE: e . . 10,150 sq. ft. :::::: Buffer Impact Area (Buffer I ..,: than 501t) 200 0 200 400 feet-- — 47,969 sq. fE. Wetland Creation Area _- _ mA"vvvvw , 336,119 sq. ft. =_= Buffer Replacement Area - -- +� rsnNI'FPTUAL WET AND MITIGATION AND (Buffer Greater than 50ft) ••• TERRA BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN 69,240(Buffer sq. ft. >`:? ' Maplewood i .•• A S 0 C I A TE S _ Renton, Washington ---- --1 Ref. Preliminary Site Plan by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Dote 7/19/99 Figure 4 1 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 CORE Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 DESIGN October 23, 2000 Core No. 94168 Mr. Jason Jordan, Assistant Planner (' Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA. 98055 Re: Maplewood Estates Minor Modification to Preliminary Plat Dear Jason: Per our past conversation,we are proposing a minor modification for the preliminary plat of Maplewood Estates. Our request does not result in any change in the number of lots approved by the Hearing Examiner. Our proposal is simply to shift one of the lots in the southeast corner of the property, formerly lot#68,to a location adjacent to former lot #130. This request is due to the existence of a 30 foot wide water easement along the south line of the property (which we had assumed could be eliminated with the internal water system for the plat) and the restricted depth of lots 67, 68 and 69. As a result,the access to these lots is very constrained. We have enclosed three (3) copies of sheets 1 through 4 of the proposed minor modification showing the new lot layout(without the standard 50 foot wetland buffer line). We have also enclosed a copy of the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by Terra Associates. Per this plan, Terra Associates had included approximately 5300 square feet of additional buffer(beyond the standard 50 foot buffer) in this area of the plat. You will also note that with our proposed modification and the reduction in lot size to 4500 square feet for the proposed lots 129, 130 and 131, the additional buffer now totals 9100 square feet. This increased buffer area more than compensates for the 875 feet of buffer impact by the new lot#129. Please call with any comments or questions regarding this minor modification. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN,INC. az‘Ad Craig J. eger Principal—Project Planner cc: Joe Herr, Burnstead Construction 94168LtrO4Jordan.doc ENGINEERING • PLANNING SURVEYING .. r • CITY OF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 11,2000 Craig J.Krueger Core Design Group, Inc. 4205 148th Ave.NE Suite#200 Bellevue,WA 98007 SUBJECT Maplewood Estates Minor Modification Request Dear Mr.Krueger: This letter is sent in response to the proposed revised minor modifications associated with the Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat. First of all, thank you for your timely response to my previous requests regarding this project. However, upon further review additional analysis is necessary before we can approve this modification request. Specifically,the revised plans will need to include the following: • Please submit two copies of the full plan set (sheets 1-4) without topography lines. Also distinguish the lot, wetland, wetland buffer and mitigation boundaries with different line types. In addition, please clearly distinguish the wetland buffer area that is going to be eliminated as part of the development and the new wetland mitigation area that is to be added. This can be accomplished by differing the hatch patterns for wetland buffers that are proposed to be eliminated and newly create wetland mitigation areas. • Please provide a written analysis indicating the total wetland area, the buffer area required by code,the buffer area to be averaged out, and the new(mitigated)buffer area for the entire site. • Please provide a written detailed explanation of the modification, including the reason for eliminating and/or moving the lots. • Lastly, please revise the lot dimensions associated with Lots 67 & 69, as they do not appear to be accurate on the plan set submitted to the City on October 10, 2000. In order to issue a decision and to create a clear and concise file for future use, we need the above- mentioned information. Please feel free to call me at(425)430-7289 if you have any additional comments or questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, • Jason .Jordan, Assistant Planner c.c. Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 m TL...........................Gno/_.........L.A.....,.....I Oho/_n�cf rnnm mor �i real PlwsP-I-, _Its 62 \,\ _ 100 --` I ;, I 31 / 100f r 7., ,3_,/ A' / 6e i \ 1 � / if N cfl O 1 0 }'+ I ri �, , i ñ ( 9 10 '/. 1 4„ 1 - 1 ti, J.-- , i 1 ).1 it \\ A - - -_ - ,; — ,) 0 50 .� -�- . . . I �." I "ICJ ., 50�" i J i O 's O 1 0‘ `�.N �I I r I I / 1 o o o I o.__.._ - 11 0 / I i o yy- o / L - - - - 71' \~-"'�o ..... — N Nr I I ✓�_ `_ I I I `}'`" I I ��f I al �.z ��`� © ilo _ J L _ _ _J L _ _ J L _ J L, J � _ - - J I 1 m �` �a r 1 ;' 50 50. �.: p 1 E� I 50Y 456 5 i — g5- -V — ' u JI /a 454,6, 15 l PEP£ cIE P., 1 'CPEP 5 __.-Y c i;))71 \ A lil AI P- ''''' y,� 152NDA :.5.E. 1 ---- zr ..z .__ ___ ,._ �r ,.w� _._ a __� „ 6 -» Cg T`YE I- f A5STING' CURE-- C TYPE/_. CONC POY I- N " ..-• f,M 151.0 -�' GUTTER & SAL RIA1 4,59.T / ` tE 4 4, i2 •Co ;t • ! 44?15 1, PEP SE 1£4?D.R, •�?'G G 3 � � /£ 455 e, 12 CPE'P N I I /E 4,55, 15'CPEP W tE 4f�0. --,V CEP O m IT12 /E 455.,3. 12 CPEP El w/WASH RACK' )-\\, 1 j w -2 ; nQ 2 -E September 21, 2000 Minor Modification to Preliminary Plat 2 Y 4 g I S 1 G N E D C.J. KRUEGER Pi CO DR AWN R. Betteridge MAPLEWOOD ES TA TES o) 6 APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO K O CO Ilk T CRAIG J. KRUEGER 11215 — 120TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 201 Frl PROJECT MANAGER BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 I i i ."--_."1 .--i., , ,..-..,s 4-),_4---____O_,.T-P•3•R 9E..4—AN0 CS....—P T.54-bF0.• / 1 i\1 I ( ----- 2/.„. .• .•• —/N ./,. -•../' \ / 1 zr) t • . ; 1 v ( ) . / 1 \ \ N\ .,,, ,... ../• ,-- ,,, 20------- i ./ \ \ V \ , \ ,,,,,.......,„, /., 446—„,..„N ---_ .,7 ' 5,..............--- .....------ , .'------ / ----/—,.....i. . it,, \ / \ ,..s, \ / \ ),.. \ , ----„, \ _______ / \ / .., c, ___,,,, \ \ \ • \TRACT F ''.--,,,,, ,:--, ----7,,,,,,,,„/ /A\ : • \ „ , \ ( N.. ,_,..„. ., „, ' 4-49 o A- fci 4 OEN SPACE '--11ZTLANI Er;NL.,_ ., • 1 23S'354 SF. / '''‘NN MITIGATI .•-„z...? AREA / / ... 8 ----„ ,, ......,. ----„, \\\ \ -.E3 ', \, 4 V la \ I ---- ..o • , ,..„ ---, 77 •• 4it ..- / ,, . 471) 1 !60 SF. ---... ,) "---..............\ 7 i ',.. I\--, I .• / 1_. — -1/4- — r---\\ 1 1 0 ( ) - / _ , in j.........-/ ------„, ,••• ......--- , i /--- — I •,... ----,.. . \ , - .‘,;•)< -----1-`,..- \ , 2---.. ...-----435, I ---. '-'-. ir Lf:::::> I \ / -,,,,,,,,,,,/ . '--., ___ s••• -----------N' t I 0 ---'---------k ! • --,, -90- n dl I\ 0 '`1 , '.-• r_, —110- — -1.- _1 ) 1 I . • - _J 's\ / ....,\ / . --- / / / I d ( • \ .: , . . . (WETLAND-It 10_ _ _7_ 2 ,,, , / ....-i Os ,::;y- , \ / (ak • 4 N. 1 ' I $ _J /.-----.4.3.2 --- : kJ iii- )( / __ / \ . V ( 132 'il* 1 13 412 N7 i i / ' i / '"••4 •3". 221 S.F. ' 6 i < \ k. N ) I 117°'‘'N '. • • ....... ir , 134 N /I I _J / I k. \ .st r-, 7......„ 6423 SF: 1 ' i 1/ /a / / i \ ... \ si) / _, 6... ,J \ 1 14£3:L9N ) ( A ../ if ) ‘....„ ....4 i 1 \ \ / ' • N \ \ i -••„, t k,,,,, 1 135 7 -.1 N I \ •',, i - / ', . "77- I 1 1 1 / "\,,,, I- - -/"-- - -1 I 1 F9- --1-47/LV-7 // ,4_ _ .__.,L _, oV \ 9 -'V. isv-, 1 ,,-',_7-- I I ' o 4 / 1, /I ,-. --- I/ i I `kri / ‘...„,_.. )/P. ...„.. 0 ....„ ,.. 0% cs‘ K3• / I/ 0 1 ''N. 'I P, '--5 1 1,,,,,,,56ty 9/ .„..-1 4 Ti 1 N. 1 0 _ j„---1-1 1 / A a) i N 'It I _ _ i_ _ .1_, / L ___./__ ___ _ j._ _1 ____/ ,\,97z. \ ——— / , , .. .. O' to' / ,,, / 0 .., i , 1 / , 1 I I ,...__.,, -, .. , -..n 50 ____ r 0 _ I t, ‘ r‘3. ort..,__._. I ------1--- I I ( -"'`•-•,,,,,, 0---m•-". 50/ 1)1 1; 0 /I _I _ / 1 (5‘ ' ( \ ,, ti / ,,ui-_ • ,,,I c-.) ( 9... (,., 0 - / \ ‘-•,.. 1 I , __....,,, ....7 r _ _ _ i r_ 77___ 2, r--, / \ \ ... . I - It-- ___1_ T--"--- .7-z- - - .- - 0 7 4 K5 9- L V '6" e --i 0 ,,-, g; T, t 0 - ,„ 01 - -3 0 6 0 Art _ o (1)---_N oI- 7.41-7' --1-1 r..il, t.0-0°.,A .. i 1 0 - . 1 p 1 I :-ll I If, :11 /.--1, I 4,,/j: / I ...,./r -1u1 — / I Y 1 8\ 1 ' 1 1 1 i ' '-----------1-- :I . 1 ' / 1 51324‘f 1 9" till / 1 0 1 , 0..' s L _ _ L; _ _- L--- J L _ _ _ J L ir 1 ,-- , . \\- •1 71p.r42, 1 \\___Di. /i 7: 1,i LI-EP 5 r ,•,1 .,,,,,, 11-' L_,j.fet_ • 1 ---- PI ,- I-- i .," , .,, 152NE) AVE:. S.E. \., 1,, ! i I -T-------2.)-- - g. ,---- -,, , , . _ _ _...„ _ _....„.„.\ -- E I i e:iti .21 -3 -.- •CO tt-/Za. P°riff' '._.1- --A 00:578,vaiRa---' CUTER & WALK '8, nPf.-!-----', 1 . i.?/41 45,9 7 E 455.6, 1CPEP N 1 'CZNC. /7.../V .,\" ,,,/ \-g. .4613 2 I) ,,,N, \\N ILE 4,-30."-, ,,f.)covc --,- - - ,:, , ' I' )o - - F lE 4552, 1.5TPEP if, LIE 460.11-42'CPEP .-// \-N '''Cy) •-vg..z no .." , 13 1E 455.3; 12"CPEP El w/TRASH RAcx - I it \ i 11 't. 0 Z‘D M es 17 a - DATE APRIL 29, 1999 PRELIMINARY PLAT , _..... . 0 0 c=. a c_ zCj3 P1 DES GNED C.J.co R.W. KRUEGER m MAPLEWOOD ESTATES nn 4t. _, -1 DRAWN L. ....4 cb E APPROVED BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION ..1,, 0 1.4, -T1 CRAIG J. KRUEGER 11215 — 120TH A VE. N.E., SUITE 201 T PROJECT MANAGER BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 , , - .. ' 11) I 14ANL) tz5 ,i,.- ,i, / i / i . / Z N.,.....„.. i/ 1 \ ../ ..f TACT I5 : 1 i 3; • OP/ _ / • / '• / / 39465 5.F. / ./ i • ; .„ , . ....._ 7 , ; k ' ---------""-----4<------,---.' --- L--- — l----- ! \ , /.• 7 . Z/ 7 d , / ,.._. . / , / 1\ 1 r ! 7&ç „/6 1 / z t . , 7:— ., / .• i• ., k i . --2___ • . .,/ ___. .• z , / ,/ i ,•; , ,: ._•••• ---.‘ _.e. • . ,i :. , AA:a - ''. .-m' /. / . ,.. .,' ' \ \ ''''1. \ / ..,... ,. ......... / '' ....Po... .,.. 7.. \ \ .,, 17.1, ..........''''''...... ...a.T, ...... ,,,_ / • /'\ \ ,,\\ \ ', \ ,..„....._ . '..-• / ... \ y N,,, N N. ----..._ '4*,,, \ , / k N, s'„ 1 _„--- / \\ \TRACT F\--""--....„ -.,-,-, \ -•„., . N„, cii.EN SPACE --,V fLDET-L.4%\t_i ______.....„ .--7--1.---)\\\., \\•••., ,,. •. •, 23S354 S.F. / *' 'N\ mITIGAT , • -, \ • 4,s;;--• I ''\ '.,......---- AREA , . \ -.„ ,..„ , •• N/ / ., ,....J ,•,„ _, . ____ ,..,.. -...,_ (-4- - ,--10\.,__ ' I4.,',... 41,11.1.1 ---•,., ,,,, /-i -\-, \ N 7 ) / ii..‘ -... - _JILL,, .„ / d -\,,, R I(11-8 0 • .• i / 1 .. J --___ / --------4-3:5---- / 0 -1-1L-1—, I . , .. ...„ 1.. , N ,,,,,,_ L _ •1--- ---------K•1 ------..„ I i .: ... :•,, ,,r__,,,,____________442.---, 0 ____..,..., II r______60006!3_,..;Lrlo, - 4- Jr 1 , ._ _Ho_ _ _L >-- / ''-' L---, ••-°" .. •: Ci •,.;,:y,,, - 1 -,,, a 1 . 1 / .•- ..,,‘/ i 1 71 \t1 0 J •, k, \ 0 , in 1 I I 0 / TT / 44/,, / , ,, , , 0 \ 0 i I 55 0 5F. i I ( • :. J- ‘-. , IV , ,. ,1_ L _ — to— — 7"- (littLANI—•\ ‘,/,2 •. . , -1.--..... . '-'1 \ • ' ' WI / /N ., tv i . N \ / . . . iii \A/ Il N / N k 132 ,-- 1 0 ,• / , • / V 1 41> ' -7 1 ,0 i \ \‘; •3\ 221 SP. / /I i, .• 0 f i 134: .-- LO ' C \ 1 N N / r•...,' ....,,,,,,, t7, 1 i''''' r , . a / , : iN, , , 423 5.F..: •4 ..' / Dr--; 1 yi_ 4' icv , . .. ••.., . \ . 4ire., A i • • i ! 4s, "`,. \ i f" i / / I N ) i IS1 I (I I \ •.,, • t / 135 v . -. f '\ 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 CJREBellevue,Washington 98007 DESIGN 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 • October 2, 2000 Core No. 94168 CITY OF P*NTON Ms. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Development Services Division 1 O C T 0 2 2000 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way BUILDING DIVIfiiON Renton WA. 98055 Re: Maplewood Estates Minor Modification to Preliminary Plat Dear Elizabeth: Per our past conversation, we are proposing a minor modification for the preliminary plat of Maplewood Estates. Our request is to shift one of the lots in the southeast corner of the property, formerly lot#68, to a location adjacent to former lot#130. This request is due to the existence of a 30 foot wide water easement along the south line of the property (which we had assumed could be eliminated with the internal water system for the plat) and the restricted depth of lots 67, 68 and 69. As a result,the access to these lots is very constrained. We have enclosed three (3)copies of the proposed minor modification showing the new lot layout. (You will note that the former lot#130 has been rotated to be a standard "front loading" lot per your earlier approval). We have also enclosed a copy of the approved preliminary plat and the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by Terra Associates. Per this plan, Terra Associates had included approximately 5300 square feet of additional buffer(beyond the standard 50 foot buffer) in this area of the plat. You will also note that with our proposed modification and the reduction in lot size to 4500 square feet for the proposed lots 129, 130 and 131,the additional buffer now totals 9100 square feet. This increased buffer area more than compensates for the 875 feet of buffer impact by the new lot#129. Please call with any comments or questions regarding this minor modification. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Core Design, Inc. Craig J. eger Principal, Project Planner cc: Joe Herr, Burnstead Construction ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING R.' 94168Ltr03 Higgins.doc /....°. 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 CORE Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 ��DESIGN September 26, 2000 Core No. 94168 Ms. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Development Services Division City of Renton ..,,2.-' 1055 South Grady Way 1.4 Renton WA. 98055 >l` Re: Maplewood Estates Minor Modification to Preliminary Plat Dear Elizabeth: Per our past conversation,we are proposing a minor modification for the preliminary plat of Maplewood Estates. Our request is to shift one of the lots in the southeast corner of the property, formerly lot#70,to a location adjacent to former lot#130. This request is due to the existence of a 30 foot wide water easement along the south line of the property (which we had assumed could be eliminated with the internal water system for the plat) and the restricted depth of lots 68 and 69. As a result,the access to these lots is very constrained. We have enclosed three (3) copies of the proposed minor modification showing the new lot layout. (You will note that the former lot#130 has been rotated to be a standard "front loading"lot per your earlier approval). We have also enclosed a copy of the approved preliminary plat and the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by Terra Associates. Per this plan, Terra Associates had included approximately 5300 square feet of additional buffer(beyond the standard 50 foot buffer) in this area of the plat. You will also note that with our proposed modification and the. reduction in lot size to 4500 square feet for the proposed lots 129, 130 and 131,the additional buffer now totals 9100 square feet. This increased buffer area more than compensates for the 875 feet of buffer impact by the new lot#129. Please call with any comments or questions regarding this minor modification. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Core Design, Inc. �J . /414. --- . v CITY of Craig J. Kruege °N R E C E 1 V Principal, Project Planner SEP 2 6 2000 cc: Joe Herr, Burnstead Construction BUILDING DIVISION ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING 94168Ltr03 Higgins.doc 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 `CORE Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 V/DESIGN June 6,2000 oEV ci o/F NT, # NTOINyNING Ms. Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner JUN 0 Planning Department 9 2040 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Maplewood Estates Dear Jennifer: Per our conversation last week, we are hereby requesting a revision to two (2) of the lots in the approved preliminary plat of Maplewood Estates. Attached you will find 8 %"xl l" copies of the approved lot layout for lots 130 and 131, along with the proposed revision to these lots. Both lots are being designed to be 50 feet wide and 100 feet deep to meet the requirements of the R-8 zone. The lots are being revised to meet the requirements for access from a public street and the placement of front and rear setbacks. With the approved layout for lot 130, access is required from the public street and would require a 15' front setback and a 20' rear setback. With a lot depth of only 60' (which does not meet code),the building footprint could only be 25 feet wide. This is not the intent of the layout shown on the approved preliminary plat. By re-orienting lot 130 to the street in a more conventional manner,the appropriate depth can be achieved and the standard front and rear setbacks will result in a more useable footprint. The buffer adjacent to the westerly wetland will be reduced to a minimum of approximately 35 feet at the northwest corner of lot 130, yet the 50' average buffer will be increased by 1500 square feet due to the lot revision. The revised lots will reduce the buffer to the west of lot 130 by 2000 square feet, but the buffer will be increased by a total of 3500 square feet to the west of lot 131 and the north of 130. Please let me know if you have any comments or questions regarding this revision. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN,INC. Craig J. Krueger Principal,Project Planner Cc: Joe Herr,Burnstead Construction ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING 94168L#4.doc qq -Oco 1l , PP PRELIMINARY (1-3 MAPLEWOOD SEWER LIFT STATION STUDY <<yo��"rp F i Mqy R��TOjv ,I✓G it U� 1998 Ci cn z �� 00 Z ^ itb, . . N o v SE 128TH ST w > W Z > a a o _ ¢ a SE 132N0 1 _ CID 't a 1 in co u LLI SE 136TH ST > w Q Q z N in 0 ma's SE 144TH ST o- a Sf Re. NTON _ MAPS SE ��c1ES RO VA L Hwy (CTiT O 1cjD ,� r * „1 mac„eta •k. ♦ „ a r IF, 1II DODDS ENGI r• ` '• ""4;" > ..' �' F y r Ma X. *1$: - 'N yyli PRELIMINARY MAPLEWOOD SEWER LIFT STATION STUDY • PRELIMINARY MAPLEWOOD SEWER LIFT STATION STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary ES-1 Section I Existing Basin Characteristics 1 A. East Maplewood Sewer Basin B. Zoning Section II Alternative'A' Location 3 Section III Alternative'B' Location 4 Appendix A References 94168COVER&TABLE OF CONTENTS.doc Executive Summary Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study • Executive Summary The objective of this report is to present two alternative locations of a sewer lift station which will be constructed a part of the development of the Plat of Maplewood. The lift station will serve as a "temporary" lift station that will pump sewage from the Plat of Maplewood north to the gravity sewer main in SE 1281 Street until a gravity sewer main can be constructed south to the Renton-Maple Valley Highway. The Plat of Maplewood is a 218 lot plat on a 62 acre piece of property whose approximate boundaries are SE 128th Street on the north, 152nd Avenue SE on the east, SE 136th street on the south and 148th Avenue SE on the west. An onsite gravity sewer system will be constructed to serve the lots within the plat. The gravity sewer will be extended to the southwest corner of the site. The lift station will either be constructed in the southwest corner of the plat (Alternative 'A') or on the southern portion of the King County Parks Department property to the south (Alternative 'B'). A lift station located in the southwest corner of the Plat of Maplewood (Alternative 'A') would be able to serve 425 acres (1,650 dwelling units) of tributary area. This lift station location would provide sewer service from approximately 144th Avenue SE on the west to approximately 164th Avenue SE on the east and from SE 128th Street on the north to SE 136th Street on the south (see Figure 11-1). The main advantage of an Alternative 'A' location is that no additional easements would be required to make the gravity main extension to serve adjacent areas. The Plat of Maplewood would stub out sewer main to existing adjacent right-of-ways. The main disadvantage of an Alternative 'A' location is that the potential service area is smaller as compared with Alternative 'B'. In addition Alternative 'A' would not be able to serve the existing failing septic system in the Puget Colony development located north of SE 136th Street between 140th Avenue and 142nd Avenue SE. A lift station located on the southern portion of the King County Parks Department property (Alternative 'B') would be able to serve 585 acres (2,444 dwelling units) of tributary area. This lift station location would provide service from approximately 138th Avenue SE on the west to approximately 164th Avenue SE on the east and from SE 128th Street on the north to SE 136th Street on the south (see Figure III-1). The main advantage of an Alternative 'B' location is that a larger tributary area can be served as compared with an Alternative 'A' location. The Alternative 'B' location would be low enough in elevation to serve the existing failing septic system in the Puget Colony development. The main disadvantage of an Alternative 'B' location is that the location would require the City of Renton to acquire the King County Parks Department property or obtain an easement over the property for the installation of a gravity sewer main and the lift station. ES-1 94168es.doc Section I Existing Basin Characteristics Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study Section I — Existing Basin Characteristics A. East Maplewood Sewer Basin The Plat of Maplewood is located in what is known as the East Maplewood Sewer Basin. There is very little gravity sewer service in this area and most homes are currently on septic systems. The Plat of Maplewood will be required to install a lift station for sewer service for the development. The proposed location of the Lift Station with regards to the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan will be examined in the following paragraphs. Although the city does not have a "Comprehensive Sewer Plan" for this area, the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report is regarded by the City as its Preliminary Comprehensive Sewer Plan. In October 1997, the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report by RH2 Engineering, Inc. was completed. The report was produced to evaluate options for providing sanitary sewer service to the "East Maplewood area of the Urban Growth Area." In general, this area is from SE 128th Street on the north to the Cedar River on the south and from 138th Avenue SE on the west to 184th Avenue SE on the east. The Plat of Maplewood and the Maplewood Lift Station discussed in this report are within this general "East Maplewood" area. The report evaluated 5 separate options for sanitary sewer service to the area(Option A through E). The report divided the East Maplewood Sewer Basin into four separate sub-basins (Basin 1 through Basin 4). Depending on the service option, the four separate sub-basins were tributary to different future sewer trunkline options. (i.e. trunk line in SE 128th Street, trunkline to the Maple Valley Highway via Jones Road, etc.) The Lift Station alternatives proposed in this report have tributary basins that are different than presented in the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report. This is because the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report did not identify a lift station in this area and the Plat of Maplewood is the first major development of recent times to be proposed in this area. The decision to maintain or not maintain the sub-basins presented in the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report may have an impact on which alternative location is best suited for the Maplewood Lift Station. The attached figures in this section show the potential sewer service areas of the newly installed gravity main in SE 128th Street and the potential sewer service area of the two alternative locations of the Maplewood Lift Station with respect to the sub-basins identified in the East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report. 1 94168s1s.doc 1 // \,_ , , __ _ _ ... ... _______ ,,,.,,,_ ....i. , ..,_,t - --1---f is* -FAA i ...I . �' ll !fl : ± 4 / q .11.Lit a N I. / / \ 341E Ave !'Iu I � �- - ,.. mil �• m ((i)D (- ___ . _. � sF I I I f + /35lh / 1 III Iryt i fn ! n "' °�� ch we �� I 1LI 1.I 11 !I IIi i. �� a !m S' �+ (D IIII !W.I!IlIll I:',liI;I..I.I I!Irll�.�I % C? /yam '!�I!�II;IhII!!q ) FFF II 1 rl1'1 I II: J F, //N. r J ! II ,I I (D O_I 1 �I I1 ! t I, �� r. n it I I�� Q v`C (D -� I ll 1111! 111!j A-- -. % 1 :< I ,t ((y _ _ \, lll�11111p1!!!Irk 11'IIIIIII�IIIII IIIII„ 5o `,�� 1� i lJill �1,IIIII1 I IIII11i1111ii1lll l I`� _ -� fb I 1 I II!, 1 1 Ieineltoh -• �. • 'i!1111t of 1 y1 i�t Ill V II1p III I I 1 II I I!I Pill 1,,l I1 fppf -st�. \` I IIIII 1111r�°Ii Noll IIII�I IIIII fl 111 IIIII 1 1 A Q S IIII Jry I I ? I1 11 1 IllwnnnlxwlYlYlwgm Fpll IIY Wnn WtlntltlYax �_• y� 'y`I:I j `I IIII I IwNAYYtlIwI',22ww I2'4IwYNw 14%1-. \ n 'll�I IIII{ 'G!!III I'f1 •5�IfII lI C�!li I IIIII ICI !"IwM1YItlNYBlwxlw tlllnUW1114BIIGi,77flIR1_Yal:.w•�i I' I M l 1 h ,..P m } - ,uxnw,r..- ,.., I'1� /11d' i Y II 1 t r Et I III@ '" 111 M 1 "xnxl,�au-w '� I�q ,, ,�WF'i (Ipl.x l�l'6ttIhL1tlrL 11 INI1I,,, I�I I Ill,llj 5 ! 1 Ilr;1111!, xIwIIt-,74dY111nwIIIWNIYW •. '�YI it I!l,lig 1il4,1111!11,4,III 4I ill,,,,,,,II I!I:III I'l 11 II!! Il1lIl I I 1114,!II u!uwilunnu lunnwuYNUnnm __ r^ �D :,'y I I ' rxn. --- 1 r4� l�l II II it I�''jafilll l�t'I I''h111. 1111I'1 ii Ir!Ilt , :I ,�I I Nil kunnnwuuwwxnIIIIMI Ik...TX `�.a c -. I,' t 1 , I I it . I•, d!mining lilw 41.”Im llxr nutiottuaw- = lit,'' .I I ,'.. �. ("I"! .'° u, _ti L.' IIII !I I!, un 4 t 41 �'y t uxuxxuxx wn mm rn:Iwupnnun f� • ♦,. ,1 //,tx' I u1 CiC I ,I ILC iF J t , 'I I 1 ,'Ile ulxuxw:wu uI ormrxnmxxwY:ww--' C r-'1- �/ 1 f !1 1 /.,:----:-' '' I 0. q 'I IIII I 1°I 1 jj .1 t 1' 0 I� ,.Furouw uuwnuulrowwuounast��' ty �D jr: I I!411 �r'I I'I;U!I lt' r '`.'. c _ " 111,. If it'^urc I!y1.l,l lj .'' II 1 IIII I,1'1'� Iy11 Ili.. try C• Wn! -t i '. r u'!'�r / 111 ful 1 1 IIII IIII p I' nlll r ,YNFuu iFuwmwuw IuurYnF + 11 I ! d 1 II I ,, IIII h 14 !.1'il 1,ill'', I i 1 I I nuiiuuul�'�`mm .dig I:,I I ,1 9 (n ;1 Ir,!'n I I II 1 III 1 L I B , I�' I I ' y l u i l 1..1' I I I� ] 6 �I,r': l� r III'111 ., I.11; 1 1 II,"ILL 11,''1 1 1 1' I 1 i1,, I Ij I; '7' I I 1 1 III ll1 I �I II 'wtlommili ra 111! Q a' i!I ,II 1 III III II 1 I� I 1 i' IIII iI I , I I' 1 ll 1 1'' ,I ll y 1IIII11!I11II!�I I ul@Outl.. I m !^I _._'.' 1 1 I r� 1 IIII ,� � II 1 , II ,I 1 11l Q 11:. i. / 111111!II j!111 i'n'.1 i1,, ,j, 'I 111111111111 ; II )II'q`7) ! I 1 ; 6 rD' 1 ,III IL-, I' I!I ' I II I 1 I N � I 1 VI i t 1 _ , 11 I�I'th�l ! � ,� ', I I��, I I IIIIuI L1,1 4 1 �, (D nI I i � a Ili!�'III I 5 rIiililk fl''II' II I I1� �Id1 1 'I�illi�l III III itr "•-z.zu �iMw_C'Eq,\ �" ,rm.r,. if w6„ac�'c' _ -- c , f l it 1 I� !' 11l'i tY l 11 ;� �IInti,'1',.1 f N'IG:IIq:�>, ! II ;i0 ! l 'IIII l'I `a ,_. jI, III III ! 1! _ 1 'II .R. Ili ,, 1,11114.. jv Ul!II NryryQ�gpry��Il i �/ !, r I 1 11 lx 1ia II r. I! ! ,,,F.. II tl}11111�11 I,' , I. IIIII IIIAIII,,,r11' ' �i v l �y,I;r, "' ' I rJ I��I! lI I4'11 r,g�'�b I!I I,ItI I II )lIi:II I�. li�I! IIIInIIRF I{ul I' 1 I � a L :ury�'N6AA- �i. II!IY' I'I 14III!II a�q II �i .c I I AI LLL°GGG 'Ir l!1lJ Id'Ii IIIII 111'I,iIF1'i II11I!I1 i.j1 m� iI 4.'-y'.r l47a�^F , s„1 i,11 Lm�n C_.ncur 46 'SL r, _ rn 1 GllAl jlll!1!I III IIII III III „!IIIII I Lfl [ Ii�/^� I1111� .IB r#I, F ! -:1[ ':,+ • I I I al LW fu a ! I ,lil in.'', I 11,r1 ! 1 m ...�.�_ _r_1 II ii1 i,1 III I I� I III 11I IIt h '1 .1 r 1 I FA�' I' 1 �111 Iri111�Iilll111� „!.''Ili IIII: 11 -..iF..Y��y Al I . TI II.I IlI.,i� I: lll',.'ill 1i i �. I 'I II 11011 I I I I (.... Oil I „I, c q 1 ,y,�, y. lI II..J I II1II�, �II19�IU1 UR� UDfIl11I�;I;�I 1 � [1 fIPI I�I,lIL11�Il1 v4 ' ......L.r cn II I� �'I ""'OIIilei; 1 I,I'I.;II 1'1 IA,�,I. Ili It itI C'....k., � ' IIMFFFFIx '`, N I ''FFAFItlmIIRF1h°IilkT it n I i 1 I N. ," CIUII �r ; t j f �I il° II41I! .II I�I> ' IC^", ,1! li Z Iq. r I I 1,; �./`+� III 11 P1 1� N tl' l II 1I Im, 1 1i I' �'' U 1 I II I I II Iill l II„ II'Ihllll yl i f ! �T !I I I I N FFF L 9! III ,;1 __ d� 1. 11 illl1 IIII ,LI°!11 I II�!��l II hh, III f ...,i) 'h JI IrI l Kin.ill, :n'�! h�I ! 11 I Nil ,Ede t !l I it! I,. ;.I 1 m �HlG III I Ill l III 9 I t ! I! Ill I j1�u lulu Imp,,,ux _ �..... �..::� ::: ,� If"' , �I p,x Ill! 1 I an�I!.0,51;iii II r �Ihl�i� .T d 1 1111!j J I1 111II pol�glltl�Il�1j11 I II�� 1 111 II, „0 of I Jllf k f*1 �. VVI�I 1 1' 1110 9 I I 11 I mlu II 1 hl01, 11 Oil t ti IIIII Lill II�IIf tl '� f 1!IIIIIII 1h1J1'�II 111 IIIII ! I I IID!II IIIIIIII!IIIIh� f 1 j I h 'ri l,! I r.N.!p;r i y z !� 1� 0,00,tl li ,,„ l Aye I _'i c„ .11�1'I'u �a I 1 I i1'lllld IIII! --� _ui.:.,.� r �''i „:)(IIII Ave St �- ' 1 IIII!Ilmllll@III y I Ilflol' p 11111 IIIII I --__ ,T, 0� � � � I I�IIIIIIII ,i11 I II II I lliI,I .'llll!II!�Iul010IIhhIiID ! �IA _-JJ.- n IluuJl�iu II!�111�I I�� Vhlt dll A 11 „ 41.159;101 A 1 iy II { / • Im d V) I 111 II • ' % I/R.� IT1 1,1) I'11 II r -�.l V) / lIII1, I!I �� r"�! 154th Ave. SE F w 1 i i I;. url N 11.,, �. - .`,a r N I I f I �N 3 � i � �' �II 'III! III t ! Ilj� !!U,.I I I 'I!IUlq�h! I�y' I! \} T J a II 11!b I'Itl1I1�!LIIIIII�IIq„i l� II/I/// INPI II IIlll�l J I N r- Nli hllI a g. `II i I 1;4!'rl !I„II 11!I ,. A 1 ' l i ! 11 i 1 jf. '•�' O� f_ it lyli -,I�.IIIIIL-1:1 11 1 II 111 I t !!, I II Irli!II!!'! v Ve SE o �, ! , I u x I. 'd I l!'!I !I I'III oa11r r1 1 --�✓ /1561h PI SE - 56 ,��' --- 156th Ave. ; !IIII F li 5 � I INI10 T, �Mi... 1'I� sir a ! AA� N 'a__."--"--- - III.yY I I !I' I l"11 . I '.l!Iww�, I,,,11, i. 1 fi(c.b, _" I) a l d U l J • /' r&- m" 158�1_JI an -o v r158�h�ve. SE ^ �L�I�II J IIIIIIO. II U. n 'I!Ptih I 1 �II II II',Ii C 160th Ave. SE e,ll!,,,„,,,,,,,411!IIIIII!Itlll ill <D _ _ illlUlCxu'nlu!Ilil 'Iuulu.ar,u�Illlld IIIIIIr 160th Ave SE VI ur I I '011^^vrt1r a x'n'I.uW.: ��) m . ;IIIIIIII' 14 I'#11111, u I Cco E 61I (IIIIII � I II! lu'I1 �� 116411�A - III IIIII Ill I III Il 1 IJ !II I I II I a ( ii Illj!lll'�Iiil!Il' "ul; I 1 flj'i!Illll 181 LL0d �-'e 1m r -._ -162nd Ave. SE J ill " 1,!mr,'r p11111111!Itl u i lI rI.41/Irr 1111.1 1 I. pp snn'm �� t "Is.rFu ve ne'u part �' �± 1 c, �0 11!' �we Il lll'7rtll,lt; `�t,m"IIIII „ 1;'�III Iil i1„Ll�r ISo ro !t .!III I I!I III 1 IIII IJ11 iI I 1 I IIIIII111 WI IV I(I ` o o - IIIII1i1111Ipp I?IIII I!1!1I1,11�111!1" 11181 11111'1 llrl rlsI _-, ` 0.1II I IIIIllllf 11IIii4111111'IIIIIIIi1,111I1n811111 Iiilr., p11i li. l'IIII'j�-- - N nvn1ld .64th Ave SE F 1� s _ 4 t! id i;l i`I Iu41III!I; I l,l!II,1l'W'� I I, 1 ! II' IIIIII III ^f`\ ):\_.:---))„cl: If �' i t 4x2;q.I,L111�r17;Fr , li I =11;I 1 !�n l �- w .' 4! 1 1 PII !!Ij IIIIIli: Ill'llllIIIIIIIr III --.. _ v III' III jl l !111 11 1 I! 1•1, I x1 Yl1!'I, n..11. ,i v7 Iir^�, I 6 tI 1 t�1�1�,; v!M m,I'Ii11IV'rtr I, ix III II ! I 81 I N III,LIUl I IGI II IIII �p II, i l I l.1x1 I 111 I IIr II,II I!II^) li JII i I III I r 1 1n!F II� 11,11 I " luuxw v I I! I I I IIII ' I I I l 1 11v I 1011 • !I I.14 C"" I I IIIA, yy1 J�11111 . 1 I i11111 iIIIIl1I1 111111111 IIIII;.(, (VV✓ IIIIIII III„ iM vane A n„ x ta 1 IIII(I 111 1 1' III I xl!I �i 111 III I I l Il l llIII il . ( ,1 1! _d l,lj 1 111111 I 1 i11 1 rI 1pj 41;1 ii Iiii Il /! 11 likidi 'I(IIII1II IIn11'Jill 10101�!III 11 IIII- I 11 ,III II I1�iII it 111'1I�1I1IIN1I��1rIry1I lull xa �'�;y I. '11!�I 11iUI11 II 'll i (D 1 ( 7 IIII 11 I, I IIII, I 1 1 1 I:,:C,.� !13�J. L1J I, : 1 1111 f, !x LII' �I 1 I '��7 c �' 'It II 11 IIII III III,IIII II �. I IJ �r IIt I �I°�Inr� I I �J it ��n r '' 0. 9 I I,, I Y r 19 , C YCr 1 W 1 1 I IIyI;!II iI II I LII i Id t1.Rh]! I I I�IfJ�UL I 1I --^_�•__..__ '�,I I 1 1 1 ill I l l ! 1 I 1' I,';, 1 II q ll!l,ll 1.' .) ' i1,141eiIli. 1!IixIIII II111!illl 111 11 "l1 ill ,1117�11 IIutI:,I i!' I�J I L1 „� !I III!111 11 II IIi11 1111111, 1 1111111 I 1 r III Id 1,1 I 44 11 III x Ijlill ;� I!.i1 �dtll.ul Jllilui IIIIII � F,i: odLU l lul!6111,�1 ,Idl till; 111. ,� i.iit ,1� xl...rt,.'wnrvn �'f'!IIII'I to 1,urgi, tmv56Yu 1 lualearcu c- oc.:c a„"xwunvc ,11 I,1!1!1 I,i I 1 !x � II Ih ,ftt�I II I 111P r�l IIII f!I i '"' III 1 I „„,III III III 1fl ! ! II I!!Il�lli I'I ,tl I^111'1 q I 1 II' I f II Vuu's 1 iIIiiH i1 IIII!1I it llill'1lli I II I111 i4 I I,u l Il, "tLIO 111 d i11 llll!I III III I q 1h I; u 11� Flli I,Q .i i I I Il III I � II' II �,�4!Ihl'lull u I IIII JII I! r.'I avvaxlwuawvr r.11x'.uxnanrm. '6:arovanY'uwlmn wm'YauBea nn 1 ICvu'x.lexnrmm ' I I,!ll l!i I I I -______7---_ • 111 Pov".'IxFp :i'i llc1. ,'. I II; a 11011 y l;'1i11111,ii ' ! 1 1 I ' 'I!I 'IIII h r,,I III Q I, II I NI , I I I Ii IIIII I I I IIII1' t lIv', 1.. I 1111ul I I j 'IIIII') 1tl i II co,.:.� !,` S. �I (IIIIII 0..,!I!„IIIA(„.i11111I111II11111 11i„ IF mr I'11� IIIII .1 ,�,, 1 xf , rI III I 111 t1 IIIII IIIII lu n ,II 1I�III n., :. If 4 :. 1 h11 yy+x II I �!11111.11 i '111 ^ TT T ! 1 I I�11;1 n n' I! ,s]�x III! "'!ICid III IIII III C `) W r„ I ,IIII! 9I II ':1 o 1 ?n a� 1',I IIIIIII. dxll'llihIllllllllll'li I ,,,y h11'Ii 1' " X 'll!I - g hill,,p! i!I •I ; iul, + , I 1'I !61!11'11 IIII nliI II,1 Ill I III I.Id , !1I! „II l III 11 11 Illl t r11 1 IIIIII !.I II .:11�r , i !r1 l IIIII bll t lI ,111i11!0 !IIIIIoilii111 d 4'IL1 ! 11!I1 t II 11-1,1il al 11 y , y I i 1 Ji, II! III1Gl!11I 1Ij'1J IIII I Illlrlljl11 Q �/,Ir I 1ia1 1 I' f. '!I!11111 � .4f .' II '!II!IIIII Iilr I ' s Ili'1111 III 1, 1111I'I'11II III I'1 If w"I 1 I I A rypppll ! `r� I'xil ilhI ii �!!I f111�111111111.11� t, 1! (11111 1,! IIII111!1111I'I II !Ilililf IUlll 1111,!ol I 175t1. Ave ,.iII�'!II I!i ;lit: II I q1! I l!1 RRRFFRI IIII t II I;, 1 I IIII!II !I it 111 IIIII mnmlm'r.. n Ixlr,.N: - $E ,( I��pI I 1 it ' I III _ IIII H u IIII r o ci) q • -- /j �` - I11II11 Illi11;1 .1,T;1!IIII II!! I IuI III!:..__ I lu 111 1!FFu!I!IllliIl„IIIIII Iil litll�, 11 I 1'. -�- .+ Illll111i1 ilih,ll CII�„ i!i I,!'yi11 i IIII.(a '�'Ili,.l 1.,,,,I,1,,,,, Ihil111I1�I!IIII(IIIIII 7!IC!!11�1111I III li'I1111 IIII II GI K Z z III,1111n [ 1� O yll, olii 1!, 1 111N I1 11I!;I,.I.I...„,:l p Iii fl l'Ili m 1 till It I141 111!IIII 111 11 lT1 Mp�_�.---• Ili 111 mlili ill111 II'IIIIIIl�' I ll 11 IIII l"11!1 '11111-r_A--_--_ 6, 10 p 1 'n4 I! ; I li i, anlrletl ptlnt"!,,„,NW'IPIUIIU[Wdtl 11 1 11�. I !.II 11111I 1!'�II1 �! 1,} PF� alu °sv ,N,P„y1lM Ilirl it 1, pnwWn' wWWlti'lIIII s IIIIII I IgIII'Ii11 1 1 IIII Qu1fll II1�I!!IlII1 I n I°j111�'IYWIuwuFln Ilrl I II ! I11 I' Illi 'I'll IIp a 1I IIII! J N Cnzn111i11IlIir 1' InIIII11'�'II !'i I1�NP'� I ( I�I1! Ill I 11IIIIpl 'IIII11 111�u 1„ I ImNM.�'ililAB111 'Ij7 liv 11dn!. J'Z v �/1 i 'h I111h I ;II IIII 11 IIII l'!I II111i1I11q IIII III!!pf III111II II l 1 D I n ull II III III! 111 I IIIIII 1111'J a; I ,, IIIIII !I II !III ' .il !I11 t;,l�lllllll; II, Ilill 1I,IIIIIII I IIIII111I1 III i ! Il.'11,11 I Iilll,illl�- ,Il !11 i'l 11.ill 1„ I 1 II;i IIII'(! I j YIyI1!illlilll lil ll!IIIII„,11111 n!111111!III IIjfl1J,1il„II�11'il II1!1II ill!' III IIL,I it I I IlilI11III 1111r 1' T I'lll p'an 1 !I Ir W 1{(I1u1,111,,,114�I�' rljl''j jrllnl1111 III IIII I'll Ilf 1 l li li 11 rl t�l. 111,11 11. IIII IIII ILy I,II!: h XI II Iai 1 4 itl v, i I:I IIII r' !I I 1{' 1 1 II„IIIIII 1 IIIII„it ll ,,i,mlliiitil Il l'I'1 III 1.1'.III I I I i I! l0' ai ill i I(IIIII'II' l I �p'M IIu n P y,I 1 1111 r II I ll 11 IIII 1 II 1; I I I 1111,11 M / . o wlyy I,,A1�y""1Y u�x' 6.,'��'ll II I Ill 'q IIIIII i!I till Iti rx Il III °f r1 I I,I fll!lin�11 IIM III' 11�' J/ IIII III I I I I x 1 a 1 r uu:Ia w w:n nauwr6I 1,I1"i'i I I I IIIII 11 III IIII mar n nxalxu minnnw. $ _ m I'I�III!R i!III'!1,Gil lit ilyplllil llhlll �'l'lll'I ' III 4'.I!"li tlII I I!r'II �rl'I'U''ll!INti!I IIII111.11'{!II I!r ',:I I, III;rig �� = )f. I III!I I II Il ii111II I III111. !IIIIII ii 11 II I 1 it h! IIII II IIII 111 1 1 1(I 4 IIII C II 1 I 11 11 1 I! m �nA I I I I l I IIII U j !I' I I I I IIIII I II'u I Ill' Z n1 m I Ill,„ I IIIIII III11,11 III 111. 1 VI I11,111i1111I!il'l'III III �, (I,' • 11111 III III„ 11 I 1 I 1 I � � !, m!I ,II Ii,.l II11 I ! 1 r I I I ! U, 5 d I I I l! ,' 1 1! III I 11 11III t nlll x I M 11•a i Ii rr it l' / �� J N � (IIII111 I�VI/i11L+'' !III111 I I 1! ! I f I 1p it 111111110r1! I��pp�ryp lul��III�pu�ry u;,�hFu�.,IIII Bprp'i � j'c, , �a J tll I I l II IAIu'II I IIIII I, 1,,,,I II I I I ,I I II II I II 10!III 'II'I�U IU O I�I I 1 I III II I I it l III I N:rIIII','I I'1�I'ly 14PIIII101 tIY �, '0 `0 ~ 11 Itn• I m'I�.n"' I ly CYJIC°IWIIUIIf ai:'u a nl.^r'.., r 'rcxe uleC.gal:ru ' x'' J I I I!I 1 II II1 / �� 1k 4 A oo I !IIII�Igh'r1 I �4 III IIIIII IIII 1 Ill!IIII IL.;I n II II ; .< G 1 )11111111,11,111,1111,111,11 I1 I l itII ""IIII 11~'I :, Ill 1'1 '1 „I ��!III, IIII; , I i !�iI, i_�• w • co I111111i. IIll', 11!,I I N 1 1 i 1ei 1 ...Inunn r._�wlw II l I,11 I III I I NIi I I 11,1�,�I (.„1 r- rr__ /y,,� `',,; 184th Ave SE v, `•V /- !III 1Ii 1 'I!. I i �cn T !V'+l ti 1N1 ta fp ��i. '�` ', m m o 'a s ok �`- '"m p ►�+ 0 ueal „ s e. o' 72 ,,,,r,4 A e�c w2a I \ n 11111 1 • • u, I! ,-.. 10 --- ' . ,131,kt „___-.. ic , ,......_......... .,... ____*-11-1-irt-Ii; �. ,,, r .gym Sihrjrglio _ _/1� n i�� ✓-`� nionAve .E f !r11PI 1�_ 1r- .�_,_ _ ,I / t� Ave '4' •, _ _ h u I. ,35th �'I``Qa� i I II I I i +h, 1� II �� ;,,^ , � � I H! i a `�AV`-� IV G11,j ,,,,,II,4��,.'�,. I! I i, \� `, III !lr" I -'rx., i/'1' �1 jh'I�I 61 I� N P Il-U �_ �e/ 1111111ir 1i'' 11 • II:1`1 ,II 11� I ! �111 ,, �� `�: sue. .i I1 ,I • 1 ., li IIII�I��11II 4L.: 1 V.....:.73:.-, ! \\ Isti "L!ILI •I III 1 ° `� 1` III 1, I II I;: ledneilai \ �,11lhl III IIII c. i;,,,,',' Igf'111 N,'. 111111'li I 8 ;I II II III I' qI �'" �rr._ .. _,.__ 1'3 11; A t I iPd�.ry , 1, � tt III 1 I11 1--- '' .strxis r; _-- - -.__ ( l // k, F I', I ITN IN it�I� a ii4 ro i :N , r�, n w 1I'IIt ,It �' „ r ryry�� ,IJ � ' yuI , lc' 4dj1i Io h .6,P P I Fg f 1u �II / vt q IuN lq PI 11 r ',, f dI� �h dI Illat • • • ._ �s • � .., J �t I ,.IILIf �I ��I ,III 1II �1 ��I�I�:i J� ll.l �I! IIdI:�117II11� �lilll� I 1 /- l-;, I ,t' E I I 11 I IH 111011 I11/41 d1111111 1 r II 1 it,,,, Il I I,„, �/ � � �� 11 l ' -. I Ill I� 1 I w� ��1 �- ��tJ m 1I iv- I i I I II I1�1 , I I I-u _.,. I I� r � l I ! ,III � II I .ij'I' '91 14 ! SE:I I I L i j a „i'''i' • I,I i!I IAI -, el,, Ilal il I .r ' 'l$i ,. • .� I' / d II ., ? , %" J y j,I !I'I " .:.,....ill 1 ll.Ilp11' I' , 1,, 1 i\ "I.il&II�GGII,,, I,11: 1%I11 -11 li f '., �� .,:. r Z $,'I f Ii,.itiNlq"1! III )4 .., i,l mGlnpu�;�'eppf , : ✓ III II 1 1111 �'11,1 1� lh I,I%hl . ,1 `- I,�• 1I I�9 u ww 1 pp J a� �� d �. xIi il�I Ii JI rig 'II�i1:i' ��1 rll14,111 IIII, ..• _ .' pN INI `/ . .L 'it: /� ,} C� !.� l"Y � 1 I ''I i�II�� 116. '1 `�~�' \\\x I Y mYl i ..l n 1 IIII 1 r ��11...; • // 1 '1 i1111 AVtl lF nl ( 15 u�lif 11.IIt� - . r „ t Olh Av JE �+' l �n .'I Ipl'OA4.. aT, �--- �° �i fI Iwo "' ,, y 1� 1I1°. 111 1� '' nIll ,.-, Q\4. ��' r' 154th Ave. SE ____,a,I ill , L / v : , ,,,,„,, ,,, ,',i., •rf, !,k.,n, i (.. I "A":.'ir,i. k,' ,"',:rnil-,?,-;rrk....--.4.,F,,,,., .;,2,,,i,,:::::T:::•,:;,,,r,, -..;',,,,,,';',-i,...4. , _ . , PI SE :L-56th si I I1i111GIiI P III I L' --L Lf � -r 15 ve SE_ ' - Il s w coat v \ °AI 15BIh {lo. In s I 158 t �' _.1N1�H�IIN'.�., :� t� ►I , M � !, ; gal o "' �L_ 1601h Ave. SE �1 ,�II dI�IIIIIII pQ. II p�� ,�'pp I' I'"'°4R:N'' I III'IIGYw"IIuNJIW1IIIYdmdm f s.w l . �1.1..f'I '�r.�, a.•:• ,___ Ave SE �„_, and II 1 rl I,I IU 11a I Uui� 1,i ii-I c_ 162nd 164th _e I ,' ill!I In•1 ! �j„If't' (iL 1 -6 SiIIr I,I fl !LII ,IyI If)1 f _ _. 162nd Ave. SE F° & w�f u !,II' ha- I'`;o�NIN i 61 1 FLae 6vl ao^Ii6, sr .0 vwG i 9 C ro^T^9, I _ r� d" 0. Iim 1I �' I A414' ; • m rl 11I�II�Iy !I rtl I I11, IIN!�'"' �IuNt,y,•,Bu r- ci-O W .Y i,. III!1II_,II' ' 1 lh11!I I 101.I Ilh ,q'n"•'"IW�W� ,,u,n+ '^ct ``� 111 tl Iil!i II'Pro I'11i 11s3 r III! Ilillil'0111 1 _0.' q, \ v • ', IILIn i I,ih'll ,'Ili �I' nllli°I1IIIIINIu...uIM!IIUIII�O 1ti 411i Ave Sf I P coo �- ,j 1 nl c. wu d ! ,�;„I , 1,, 14 Irma,, Lj I'�il,Cll 1III 11 li1,'111 ,11 !11'iI IIIr, 1! i,11' 1 7- 7 •• I .i I I ! III 1 ! I IIIIII III G I� ' .I °� '� i ill I I 111 1 ! Ilr �I I I��IVW11,,.. 1�. , N1gl,,,i:.•liup, Ii Pr 'i IJ 1'I I Ill l l' NI 11:'dI�I III��: �li III II ,I Ili'I lI IIIIII 11 I I !I'h Iy;l 1i ,Ir,1 % III Iit:l:l%I, I 1 I (II II I IF I q 111111 III,,, 1IIII aJ w.. jlII 1�"1 I 1 r, " I I,,114 4 I l�al, I Ii 1!I Iry IIlT 1,• ,,,i 11 1 II , _ 1 1111 lh t lti1 1I II II 111 n !: L �' II i 4Ih 1'1:1.1 I uu ItI t r 1 1I I I u I p�I f 1' l.: ,' I, ' 'I d l i IIINII tit I�: II�11I,tIIIiF� I I. III { , ,t,IjhdllllYllli II II I. I i•!I u �ir11'I I'IIlI'Illi f 1 I 1 lhl w,nro''•• mm••, II " Iw I ffga me P,ci:uaw.v Il v v .:u umur 'o I i1 r f,,f !11 I d 1 II rdi� II p '1 , , if ji In Ili I��5�d' 1 N III i (}dii1 k III,�i, III Ili I '111I 1I' , 1 III I I I I U ,� 1 �tl& !I l 1l 11 I 'FI! do' ,0111'I111IIIIII,11i111111 '011,.. I,I I:!111WI ', I!II!111IIIII ull-.I,JI, 1A!(i, " II1:.,I.r11,hlIIIIIII I.,,',"'.'':iip1, {1111Ali q II A. III I'I!Illle Nllll 11 I'll , .I!G IIJJ a.,d, a.wlr ,a m.uy IV nr wrusryrn •r mo'v __ I I „ Willi I, y, P i I'i' il' ,!''lilt I��f!�! I II !: 1II 1'I .I, p!I,I I,I ! I I, I nii , wv G •'� li II I�: I I�il.I,I''I'�I!,!N11 '�h IB!�I I�Ihl1 ',�IIIIII'h I II I�'l ilr �rll r',uIIII II ptlI: IIIIII'' IIIIII�I,I, I1'ji lllI yII':illli!Il�ne n'n,'rl l'�:ir iu.' 11pp In ,I I' ,In , ,I�III P 1 I 111�I,1II,r!I II.III' II G.III, )11 I Ihl! !' 1 I d 1 1I1 I �l, y' pIalpL .1.1l! I 1 II1111111111,,� ,I,INI1f1 11111i� ',�1711 I�. lli1,•Iv 11 ,I,-��I R. 11.:'ni II' l!1”111 IQ!'IIIPAl,.a9 II 1fll,'I II'I !I;i , NIII'. II 'I ' '�,I. 'I. ul.,i,11 Iil'! .�I�f: ^^III 11 NiIIII III: !�' II'f ,.il ! ' IIII, I , : 1 I„ali.jll: '; j� C `J ' I!I �II'V'IiIIiIII'11' J Iy i!I 1 I I i!� I � IIII Idlo1�II I1 it VMI' 1V11�1 11!11111 !'11VN, I�`1ll1 1 3 11, Y�1� 1� II1111 ._',IN l 11 iii1111111,1111,,,,;,.:I 11II! Yjil 1 TT XIIl1! Illll' 11i1 IIII'' d11G I�M�11�11 1 1 � , IM lull III ''��la�wl�1 '. 1 �;i I I_ l�J, 1IjI11* II��I1111�1'rI .�/ � .�/ _ a , pl�� 1IgtJ1a a ( II,I14 ,UI I I , I f p �I( '^ 'Al1ih�.l.11ill �Iln'I !i UI .il�"�IIIllliiII 4 pylIt u11 hl ,e7 ihl,l�f II,WIB➢ Ij �1 I ��111111 11111N�1I �1" =' O V/a, Nli%j;.'1,h''IIIIII 1111INr"1'Ih'It GlIP4illl IIt f��,'I�M III'!I j I•�I II IIG I i di i i1 I �p�1 1! �y _ Co ,:1�III 1'1 I'II1 G'MI 4 , l I 'I I III II!Ni g i ll I pi 111,1 i",H I II r,p�1IIIW 1 Ilfl IH111 Iiigill i x Z -0 -1 _ '1 116 i I IUi!I Id111111 'I I0111,1Till'' Gjj�. 1I40 11 lill ! p,lI hh1d11 175ih Ave G ra l ill,l'iI1,141 11111'il '''I'il II, I ! 4'/ �� - I1II ll li 11 j11 III I 1 Iu'I I �1 �1a� i I�'I' W i I i '1 / ,,f1111111V II 111 III I I I I II ,'111 ,U40L III , '4 IIIW111Ld. 111 �I I t:I ; � ..- � - -- I il'' ! !I hIMI ! 11 1 IIII1 1 1 1G l ull!IIII�I I A IIII!r III Ili _ N „ I I I, i II , 1111 I,. III al h - P1 1 dull 'In I ed tiro„,.„.,,I'll! II I 14 a I II c,i IIII I I,II'I III I I :I 11 I :I, I tll , I II II'1111 k, LJ l.i L/ I 1I''':',1"l0 +'4, Iu p41111jj'11111' I�iill � IIIn4J Lr I� I�1 �IIG I °N1 I'. H1NIh%11ij ' rl ,II l;i �1 Z k, .. _..T -. _._ llplh,,,4 I 'd, i ! rear, I 11�1�11 kr II ''IIIIIIIIl11 ; ' O `� C O u) J I, CII II 1 ,w hum n+ uw wwmdduu emu a wuu wd I I ' u 1 i I w 11 I� r I MIiiYt Ilid ! ) 1 I IIII �L I Z 111 II 11111il1pli , lG IIIVlr l N11 ! 1, eIII !III I111I111I I IIII 'IIIIII,,1 • i IG %',7mis 4 a % 11h'II ll IIII I !W va/J' IIII I1J1 I �II I ! I!j111! I III11it '%'' IIIl1,11 �I d1 r u1 mmrnu�lh 4nl lnL 5�''�d/ 11�1p I! 4, M1111�4 I I 1i1i1 III I ILII dul I Ij IIIII, I II, !I I'll I, N11 ,I, II V II,,I I II 1�'IIIII'II1I111Ij fi1 II IIIIIII ��)1�� 11I 111. Iti, Pi. I�I11Ij 111 1��I, I r 11111,111111 � 11I11ryu d'11i 1111I,I 1 III III � l II • II111111,111/-, d l I �l.l '1%Ii ' luIIIIIpl.% 11J1i jlllll'I1f l'L1 i I�ILgII'i�l ,11I11 1 ,1I'11111L1 ,:1 11,1 , l li II j11,1 II I11 'lull I.1N' 11 IaII I IIII !I '1,11,1 IIIIII ll l ll% 1. IIII I,e111r1 I'li IIII'''' 1" IlI�i1111111�6nI'1 Ilili I II11l �Ii1 11 Ph,1i, �� ;.,„X,f cf l ,u aJU ,, : l i I r a yirYI,I: -I'ffr L 'IIGqi IillIIIIIlIll1111�I1e II 33 01 d 1 V)I ° Ii* 1 III I. �I III liffI I III 11 II 1 I 11i 11I 1I IIIIIIIIii �II I-I 1I1 I' K4411 I'IIIIII I l '' II�411,11 I I! p6 II 111I1I1 IlI1i!1 l 1 ,IIIIII''IIiIIIIII IIIIIIlIII 1 , r -,, C llt U I II ,N.•, I I II I I %1l,if;' ft:- luIl,lhlyd cx1 ,r Z in H'II i�Gi I 1I,I, 111;�1� ;I ' I wl IIII'' Ile IV9 I �q N 1 1 �i �, ! II .1, 1 I� YI'tl• l 11 I� 11 Ili''I�1 111 II'N 111 ''i 1!rI.tfil. 1 1 I 1 I �r,N. ,pi: -. n 11 mU II I,N 11 fldlI pI I4r, IgII Ilij lI ''1I1 II�%ullll I ,�� KL I AI, 1,, C 11,, �I I ,� II N I h i" I I]U II. 1 r II ; 1 1 w p1111" �� .] H IIII ,� 1 I, wG ul lr I,alnoul , °I vu 1, , d I r m t1I1I1Prill I , III"i,4 1L11lill�I ill',,1111%Il O',Illl,;I illl!II(:Ill,1 I,lr::;, II ll i�7 1111',4I� i '.• iilil I,I 1 111 t' I'll n I 1I ll I I 7I I I'll I � 'll ! Ili O u I �I �I !I!III% ,� III II l a Ih q e A / °ill l ,II,,II ill 1,l%III,. iI IIIiII:J1111I : I Ill,11, I ,TINT,Ill''I IIII l ! 1111 !l 111'IIIII I1 i!' to O b � ' II I1i i,l ,1 I�,uI1Nli�ed I N all'' _I Il,_,III a 11G�' II�JI,I�yllal��it: 1, ��I,..�I� .- 33 Iq �. , _ 1841h Ave SE NI .4 '.� O b ai,II I I.':it,,,.I1 -I j I� MIMI. O tr.. I �Ay Q r. a' /fi n , „ O ct 0� `f v 0 it 4 r.• A N I 8f P�� m�a V m V N L Or 1 �r m-2 , NI , (._ ) • T8N o• a h O 1 T (,t- i • �• y, o • / N Uil--k ki W Q J7 '\\ 1 fy _ -, 7, ... _. ./, ,,, . ,. ... ...ii......010 , ./..\/:,1 ..._____I „,..._.. ,., I e-ilki Li% „/ I _ ._. , , ,ril . v_, - - , : (e, i , , ,,, t..../:,:tri: _,,,, , 1/14-' l i MINIMNIINI 1 a i m.a.1 44 ' //// ,;dd • l •.. pion Ave._.E_- I. i - ,( -11• IIIIII _ rF/ / \ 1 4th Ave w� / 1 f�I16, � I }� ! ._'Ial/aN!I i I:Ilijrl II l 1v �, _ 1All 1 11\ ,NII IIII 1 I • ! II1. 4' ` n v tY"I `�'�'-+'--w _ Y11 L- �� i,�1 IIII, IIII II4 I hl t i� 11 P 1 v A� - t f- IIii1 I�I - ../,A I I+l:I-rII- I. �� ,, l 1 III�'.l : - I C:IIIII` I Ill!I'I II IIII $IIJ, �� 4 „ * 7 ii1;1 11 !I I,!diI II l) LIIII III II F Yp1y ._ J- IINIIIII I IIIII�I� ` iI4�d .tt II!, il!I I y- \\� -J ,!9) _ I? L 1 I, ,F - -• / �.�, II! II ! }nI III IIIII !I ��7 �,�1 INIII �uppQP liIII -- �f- '•� [I,11III 1 1! I,' III! 1I 1 11. s „ v' Ig '•$ I '�I� I IIIII1!I:I IplIIIII: Ieme!Ion I 1111IiIIIIIIII1.I 41111!111111I ,,,ia': tl 1 IIIIIFp- IIIII ICNW i1!•I IIIII �I ill II 111 111111,II 1III111;11-01 1111111 I111 ii !t I� I l , V I I x I III !�� 1 1I1 '� IIIII r l''110. IQ:� I$IIYI ll li N(IP'JC QINnn i, w �ry� r ITV / 16i /,,Ili, Y9I!I\II I.1i,A1114,.�l'l!Ir it!I lI !I . �Ij10,11l'! 11 I 'IIII lu!I i ipti n, lll 1 1 I ()� ,4; +a II Iui,,1 a IiIII� II'nIl'II!�'iII�I NIIu u I N i a ' -o EFI.En94o ti., 'i �Ik !1 I IIh IJ II , ,III Fjl II.II 1 ��.:cull II.' ! I' 'I I'IIi III IIIj' I I!n •.:1�/ (� i• //1 ;j',.y/ u ll I!11111h l "':I, wN,f 'L,,'1sp�aplpNl;$ �� I I n� P I'' !.n / %i i'; �! II 'r!11'I!' IyI IIIII jIII 1 !.i i11,p 1111 it Ili Ilh.tl I l",,,,,x!YAuMuIMuA."R"xFW�fii I' I m: W �'®�,..I!!II IIII rys�I ea ' . •� 7 YI I :1 I I. II J III, III III1� II ill ti. Yv6. t iW,, I: III _', i i/ /:: ,,I.II IIII l (IIIIII,III I I�Ii I,II I! 1�,, ; I,I:II��I!1111 ,:III,!IIN� IIIIII I, IA.gqlIaunn,,rI��mN'o" -I.:�.I 'nen^',, II �.n.� (I.' .J / �� /./.iy 1I LI IIII1,p 1 11 41111 1A1,Id II?lo ,'! 1 p:IIII III I -,I1411:1 I J !I: ]' 1111 l !i, !II'; IIIII11 1 liinl l l L��y 1 1,gy'111�1 I II111J Ni11t.1P�f _ II,III 4111 : cllil I101111Il1 ,} I ; j I IL � 11 i� i!I,11!IIIII I'I1 IIYII IIII I I 1(� I ,Ilpp I I I I I 111; 1 I I II I�, 1 t11 l 1 1 II 11wi1 IIIIII 111 !' O1.,,,,llll'Ii,Is IIIIIIiIIAI �1 ,, Ib1111111II .III 11 ! I'1'1' I II I!1'I III II 1.1 III IN.IIfl m III III,I!11�111 !',MI ,f I1 IIIIII, 1 I I 1 ,111, N I' P " ! 111111111111 IIII I I: 111!IN NI III ,IIII II ! sun 1�_, � !Id II� I11� I�y. ,IIII lI ;; 1/ 1 1� � I I IIII IIL1' , . Ilu ! M?a �I� �6. I,+m: 142t rG St.f - III e..I 11! '1T I i 1'I rl''. I II ,i l.lt� I ILiiil l,hl,!, N:ia'I.{ it i1.11!1 i1,N I(;lr rl ,!( 1 !III,,.i,l, ,r '!I1,I I�:II�II I 1$. I�I Il :ilx.:t: I il::` f .,.,y »«^ k i I a.l I I .___I y a N l 11!�il� all::,,r }tJ I 4�nl 11 '1:11111,11 I 11i N a1 IIII I 11l I II 1 ' 1171fl I Il,hil..11. Ill t ! I 1- I'nI$i, Ir'1 1 �I-, ' t I N i h,h 1,, t. .*r t. hx li r, I �� -^' -- rtr 'y IIII91,Id1�i ��l �f;nl;b Illy, II;,! II. J.`: aId :. 1. 11I� I lI ley IJ.l[n!l'��r 111a 1'l Ili ' iY l�j 1(�N IL i I'l f: 1 , 11 , / I ww- 111911.1 1 11!iI I� 4 lfl I!9f I I I Iqq Ifl 1 I�'�3 ',I' I q t 1 IN �+ I t � �� II'�I I�11.;: Il li�il 1, II -IL ,�I� 5! Ildl IIII II I., � I� I II� I J{, ii �� LI .c I n N {I.: III I'.rjllu Pi :I I11 I 1 ' ��yypp�� W 1i 11 1 rs4.!�'i u� ' '' 11h1h (i! IrilC!Iilyll I111 !,. i I.y .1.1 Iaalllyfliggi I: r' i.a11,. rat I: ,INI1I,.1i 1 'IV l 1 ' i i�lii 4C ii1 u-'^' � p 6 YC 41. �' lfl I II11N' II, !� I i '.� III 1 I�: 1 � er"4:»�., .. n.m.._.», .IIIlplii,I. I II�NNIIIflI I I I111,11,il1.J I?i' -1 4'N� I I '] ��!`�ry�,I �pgA+ an. .-E'- ., ' + i ' '.i. i $ IIII IIII !.'� {I� 1h :I:�lIIII VII 111 II�Ii'I m'li!.ill� 'II�'ryypau�i�"a��Ipryp�'��I'1ill IN 11UNfl111Ni I I•, .. IIII;(!111Iii1++1 Il!1I1 I 111, lI I l;dl I ! . !° 411 ....:a I { I 1 I ( .� .J-'.^' I I I! ip i i L ' I rII I!I,IIhII7Ilu ! III!" II�I I N 151 E�"-'1�I nj 1 Yr,,(N'.I' , 1 1. 11f1�;l llilB t ;y-' `/yy�.7/ ' !�Y �I I 'N'N'a ll�ill�'u111'� K11yI',II 11 ( 11 tltl Il li11!IIIII' I.11II, IIIII 111 II ,, 6/ Y i ,. I I Ii�IJ 11 11 I `,11 i .., j I I RI q IIIIII! e 1 t 11� ''I� ! III III � � � II I I I I III I 4�j1, 4 1 Li I I IIII Ph c I l N 1 II'1 !Ili I I II !R u 1 `' I II" 4,1t1 I "tl t I11111!I:I 11,S111l 11 I 112E YuI .yIII III I 11111q11',11111,',1's 'Mj ' I RI .1 ti, If II I rI f I �, I IIu, IIj a.:1.. «.4...Iw•. � ' ulnl �1 i x II 1-1 IJ1111 yh111�"i 11411 11 N'")1I11 (II 1dV I4, I$ I m �1'lIa111 n!y"Ili lhf;i! 11IIlIII!:gil!uill!1N!. II IIII. ( IfiII F ''1v^` ° i II ^d N,NI 1,j1,, q; v 1 'fl'II I. �„I Iil!'I 1'Y1i: 1 1( b' !I�x n Ijl IIII 1 I I l,i: Ii i '..f,',.to i . ' '�yr�I 4 1 1• 4' ! E 1 I u . •! I � I 1 , a�Iq I�f I n .I --�1 f - 7 ' 11'1ilJI��I�, 1s 111!r'I,I • '" 11''. 'I fll ��q�� 13 111,IIII as BI.i I 4 1 i 1 rx 1 f "W0 1 I ua01.. ',It ql y �q ��IIII !�II11!N111!pNI i! ly! I 1 1 - II 111 I ( I, III 1 4 Ira -!I an _ rN I gel Ilf I11I IIIII 11 I I Ip "'I I IIII 1 N N .'" ��► I NI k N. I!1 1 1 dJ it i i ll I INIm Ifl I I 1 d r I I I I !1 i" ^U n y I N u'f m \(^/1 „ i.';f .L IIIIII a l! !II NII�14 . '` 14811h Ix v g 1 14 I 17 P1a ! ' m __1_ 1 t 1VNP r�y�yypp pR IIIVIi�,(I :I�'1: ��' l !Iw,!1 II( e4i, u , fi,1Ip'411'Alltl yv1 r..-. -:+F� I !. 'A, =: !{ 44PI,'I�IIWLNI'p'll� ' Sul h II.�aI V II 1 plpINIII�I!11111I''yryq�NNp°I� _ I 1�ry!�I, fly 1'_ I I , r 1 ;, { •J U I .1111f11 ) I I11 IIIII elli'I111 hiLli1i1lk1 . , T r' �.N 1.!iil� 111.,,!,II r III II RIME Iu x J II V I h1UL'I'1 al , ! I aNllh6l i 11! 150111 Ave SE �/ 1 W I. !I 1y 'I I rll NI1 I Iy! NII q1 'T ,) i'' 1 ':,I ''i'I'1111 a,m,I'll I 1 1!4 Tr J� Ili N1 I ,u,I I tV ! J 'I VII �I 1p _. IIN I'll 11 IIIIII V ! III it li ' II III Illp illl •/1 I I I 'I 11 II V 4 1 N I I '1 I i I 1 111J I I I��I I N ��J� 1� Ja I a' II ,1, I Iq I I d!11r11 i 11f r IIII rUl k d II1,11111111!!I! V; 'I''�IN�tlI II �I I I^ qq iJ,lI�k III!t:yy il�pp��, .ea'� � l!I 'I II I.I(I'hI I 1 r IIh II I I!f I 111,'� a � �f m11a p Ipr ill l1 xNMhyIIIIII�III:Vl14 Ul 4�tlp tllhr., :: 1 I,al I IN:.IIII 11 IIII III III!I'II II (I��I Iltil a '11' !Q 1 --_..�..�_ � ._ 'i:` I I r I,II I II 1!IfVl1 'I,rl'I IJLi11,1!I �, f ,r - ��Zaywelik� r� I I i t a: li Ilalli'Ii 11 III! Illl![ !IIIIII, Y1'11,111N y!I jI.II' I �r- --�_`. i 1, '1' Iu I(IIIIII fi li 1 II�Ixlillf IIII�IN!IIII ,III'I I a I ' '� II Y igiG li I 61i.1II'p��Ir IrI�.I; II I lII'l1V,,,,i,,,,lII,,:iil: J 'ill/4 / I a �n ur i i 1i I1 IO i l II II I I al t l lNl llnll I lil P'lll p011 111111.111, �- IIia I a II IIII 111IliIl 1'$,I1il llr Ilil uflu ll11 II 11 IIIIII x��' �` �J / � "' 1541h Ave_SE � I� lu I NIIII111:IIII�I�yhIIIIIIII1NIIlIIMIINI�11111rFI�1111IIIIII11111I Ill �� ___ I I 111 i IIIII' IIII(11h!.111 II IIIII1Il ! I IiII!`\ ' ll I !1i,I,1!III i , I l it 1 V,III!n 111 II I111111t�p 11Vlil11'III V I L. `` ! U11.1 � I II II' i1111I11111Ibiil 1 1NI p1'!i Ili,I111111IiiI Ilil'll"III/ ilimilii �. u�l'Imrr nd i IIII �!II IIII NI!II!III!fl IIIIIjIII��r.:�A0 I Il IIII II Ill IIIIIIIllll I h snr-a^ x- ..�onulc^^•1„u 1111.i I 11 'III • II ,t - k Qa !I il 1.or p "�- 1�61h P1 $Ec�565<;,.v��- .' 15fi1h_AVe u 1� e x I•ne -•• xoo, ee w�n uur _ • _ I.., I uhll i!Il!u.LJJ.::11�aI I I Nd l' .II,I!'ll N 11 I;!4: w1S n � � I II v.J(�rr _ lymr 1•58th y .�] (n �� i_, 15Jjllt• � Ill:'i,. aoi t J �� ' n 1 m �.nm Ili m °!IIIIII,l!hl'Iil! 11,1 'o- ,I 111 rI11I ,11,• I '� Ln g 1601h Ave. SE Ih� 11i IN IIIII I ! 111 l II!� �Nt� oam xwa'rrw 1 h Ave SE C 1641h Ve IIIInd IIIII , ; 161 TM 162nd Ave. SE "I l!f(I it litOtll I1111i:1i l' 1 1 1 y 1 n x•-r6r ''' lP'l unI 1 I as ^� 1 0 �0 1'I( lw"�'!I'll' II II IP!1111 la!11,.'1�' ! '!. . ('' m 1, S• ,m it 11,1!1!I .III,!,ll,l j�l II Ilu! i,. °u,6Elll l!I.I IIII ...`\ �- II ' H lN"ull IIIIII��llllill II l 1111a!I 111114r ml Nr Y "41l l a U T �':.1h11 � I �p 11111ry'. �1,,,I�B1I 1y1d II III $I' l n ., - II I!...��II Iy;I n!QI!i "II 1NI .:nnxllalill a til�i'Im111 llll'IIII 164th AVB .. �� ID p III yll I I D I - 111 iiI . P 11 I 'I I!IIh,1 Il I I IIII IIII I'1 f!IIII I l I I 'I 1 1!1. '`` �i li •xraIIIII�lI11pl!I(IIII'I!II!illll I!IIlIp1i'ill'idllli Ilul I1I11!I. :If�jl ._ o- . 11. ' I 1 Id II IiI Ill II 1111111'111111�1111I1illIti iwill'fl:,�p 1111 1 IL. I 1111t111 I! i! IIII Ill. II 110 111�11 41'111'I 114 11 u� w Ilun h /n I 1�' I II! '$II 11 IV�111 IIII III IIIIII 1,1ih l IIIII llln' (I'll IIII I 1,II! I If I i "' I 1 I III II.Ijp. v l a a l 'I I I I I ! �I1 ill I Il II I.Il I: III u ` II I:I I I ! ,1!, 1 1�" IIII IIIIII I:h I III' II•Ill II'III 11 I !'Ilalir'I I I i!i hll I I .III n I uumxwn !, I I 1 11 ah4 CI 1 1.,, 111!1117'uehlfl 7,1,1, $ !i'al clllll!I IIINI hI1111II'I I IIIIIIII lIII,11,0 h II I;II I IIIIII! 1111�I III 111:a1 / .I _I:ItIIN IIIII I II !.I II.III III G/ , !II'llil yl!I ma:w 6,;,aamm u'^� :an�nlwn Ni:a ,I I !! IIII INIII 11,i I 1(„IL. I .Ili Ill IIIIII ,III IIII a ( 7 N il111!11,,11t3I1'h A -II I' �,I'.I'"II IIIIIa11I:IIh IIIII 1111:!1,,il111 11 IIII IIN IIII 'll 11 l'lilhlI(!l III IIII,11.. I II M , ! I I 1$I) I I 66 I I.r Ii l I II l IIII I! ) 111 L II IN Ii.,11"I p LI III.I }IkAl1 I.,.,..11 III 'I 8 , 11 I, to,Ipl,.I' aI III,!:IIII ! ,IIIII': // o 1 1!!�y ! I j'dY ! III k11 't Ii -_I am•::rona nancro mnam ror^' ra.nI(!i a^r ul 1 ,' , - $ I 111'I r'IL6 �7!it : !�1!ry��pptl��. I I111: .I'il�� {ill1III rib I0 II�Ilili l '+� --� I II�N.� I I'°i I ' Illll ' I 11IN � NII IP9pppl I I! 11 ; 1I I 1 III ) : l, 11 f I illl l .1,+' II 1,( I III J I'I61 yy 1 1' III 1 1 'I!JII11,! (I 1rg i 11 f, I,1,..!,1111!11111!:!Illh ,!II !11 :did I I 11 11$ V I.I. ya 1 1 I 10) .I: li I N I it I4 !' it llh!II I'! 1 I!l i'I II II!1il ll l u" 'u 1 I I I, i h 1 � III 11! I li IIII, 1 ll Ifl I � Nt ,i U x) l ll k' ,1 k 11 i !IIII!di!Il I Ili!, I j1 1a1 i 1 P�' � l 1111u 111hI I f I DS j f' 1 IIIIa I '!� - I xla nw:c ulmf,,, h Iral:..; xi .. lwu al mI I, li lip. 1 t; d per, &ax xxwun 4xxxm4n f Q 'G IWIn I, I IIIIII 1 I , I I I iIl!II1 IiI, I'.� ,, I y.i` i 1�I$1,I 1y1111a I I IIII,iil �II 11,IPIi !T11jIV1N III'!" IIII III IIIII .,,,„ 'Ii,17,1 IIIIIi111h /Y 'lI1 I1�. '1 r$'F !PI! ,tI 61,!1!'' 'I I!N,,li: i !!I, ' II'iil'fla!'II�iI11fIi1 I 1rl a la' !III Il INII ,jl I i 11 I 1i, l li f � a'! 99� � „hip l(IIIIII tl1. 'Il! ill 1u!l'I1111 I11i IIIIx Ihll I!I f IIIIII W''II IIII Pml 'a.al a III;oawumNn !piada0 aannl x vuum ww I II 11, n4 a 4!IIII IYI'I�Ii l,!I IIIIII II!IIIII!,!III ,I I!'.11 I11 iI11h li I .1�1i II ,IIIII �iJh!IiI III!f'. '-IIINI I !IIII i,,la �1 li :i i6 I III. 4 I O �1llt,iT ,,,.jii IIIlIIlyt.hllllr�Iii 1111111!1$11,!, II „1,1,„11'I!I,11 d I'!Illi!1j11 !ii11111111I11 . 1! !1!II!IIIII11111Ii P'rl.yy h.1 II"!' "Ill! � 9111I!11111,Ip I! h $�1�1 11; I l 1 I , 1 I lul a I I nl l I I IIII II ly1y11 'i; 111�1:1i IIII!!$11111 !IIII 1111 111 i h111 :lt IIII 1"II" ,I!I.jli 1�!11!y. : Ili 10 liiill!II!1�1 III IIII 1111 , n I ^ I1119I !ItlIIIIIIji1111$!11 Il(1lillhi'1„111ill11'!NliI!i 1 i11!!i!N141 I !I!l I 1' 11 II 1i4I IIIIui,Ilii ''••a x' 1!IIIII 11 C `/ II IIIII$I !1 II Ii II 111 .IIII !Ill IIIII IF !'IIIII it III r �I 1 I,ILI IIII,; !IIIIII Il ll,l!�Iy li 41I�I�. ry,lL Io!$ ;I!I 1 .$I I l!. I I1111+4A.;1!Ili'Pli l.l 1III;i'1.I!I III (I:I,i�,$lilll I. IIIII I III11111111 I 1111 1 41141 1 1111 'IIIIII 1, If 03 MI lmy,1 ( ;'',I1,lillllll'lIIl11�1 I1�!l.11!I II IIII!ll (IIIIII Wy I 111 �I11!III III I$. I II I,I'! III 11411i 1 iI'V:I D /� ril N !IIIII I,iIII IIII;III 1 0611IVII1111 a ,.I I I 1l$ IIIIli11111hIaIIi1!'1'II11I, "'ll!!i!l4{ I to .< 0 0-co (n I __, g �1�n�y�Iyl II Iht IJ1 ,IIII II III Y11II II $1 II II$I �I1ll I,i1: I 1 lI III . III! ' 1� I I I _ lii,,1t'I q i4,11V 1, ! IIII!ii11111!!'I I IIII 111,1 i!�!G:,,,,!IIIII , icii!llll :.:1III'I0Oilkll �!II: IIIIII .a !'I 1- ..: lit ii Z -/ j u lI 1.,1:1 IIII 1 V 1 II II IItI!11'hl'y!I N! :IIII f l 1 III 1 I II I I IIII' �.I I I ul1 1,a I I,�:I Z �,1(� , I'r 11 II b111uI1 ! III II:INy114111 III IIN `I III 1 !Il 1' lI 11 I IIIII 111III I11'II Ili 11111111111 I 1 1 11 I !Iramul IIxK•'s 1 ro I mil! I751h Ave SE =�� - f! II 1f111.1111 111.i111141111 Ill1.!IIIII II '1,11I1, 1 r 111u I I11 x 1 ` O ' .--•. 1 ! III I I 11. I i ' Jb,: 1 I I: � �I II I I, '� ( r 1111pi1I1I11ijii1lllllilltnlI.Ii11l ,Hi, I' II,,I ill I, 1WI,•;INIIIlNIIIIII' 1 1I i1 1IiI11I'il'1;1 , GI 0 VJZ " z _._ . I III I I11 IImN! mmlllll I /` lc ! I u. y ��Appp 1I1n1 p ('I I I ! I'1111. 11 ", =-� C Ill 'L- ,. IIIIII Ifl. • II14 1 am IIIII'Li., IIII II IIII I nlNla4 lI6T•. l nlll 01 it I I :•IIIIII I 1 O /� �y '^ ) ,• I'1 i } 1 ! . I111.1' a@ilu u lu cl Inns ux4noxu u up: mit.h ti III IIII I�IIIIII I I4l l ! 1 w v V V/ 11!11! 11 1' +al'I1�'IIII IIIII ! II IIII I II I all)I IIII �'il II ICI IIII 14 III l Il' l i IIIIllll1, , III III II •IWalill N l II l!I$11 I II 1 1 111 1h ti V I ' 2 1 "I t !ldl� i !I I' 1 ! I II h! nu at CM N m mrna.Yp m 411wu 14 1•I o v 11l II I u I I, II II 1 Ij11 II 11'III h / II ! ;y I 1I l!1 I. 4 $$ III III IiI $ it I 1 ,11 !1 Ili r' ! I! IIj r NI cn /I II I111! 111,�Iil :,�•I 1 1 II Ilp�I I I I li 1 I III 11 IIIlliI IIII II IiI II -•� TD rn/ / N1 WII I I'i! 1 I III�Ii IIIII 1 '' : II !I I 1 N' 111 I 1 I- I'' IlI, I: I 11I I I 11 .AJ '1'{�1J y I Ill �!I!I !I'r!111 IIIIII IIII Ii11ji1n11i�IlIll11114I11Ii(Nn11'I'IIIII II IIall i l IIIIII! alllil{ lI1 !$IIII .A/%•' i(/ i Illl�, li wf ll �tW�r!'IIIII�I111I,1,l IIII 1,1I III!,11.1 r l! I1 ,I''I'�'Ill Iillllll s„r11 III 11 !:,111 .< II11'I 41L1�^ I.II 1 IINI I I, II mI p�� Il!$11j /l 14 11 i' 1'1!IlP $ u�'xf �I 1 I I '// $1 I11, 11111ialji',111 I I"i 1jw ^ m:ra..r..r.I m:.lm IWl.a u.rwu I m IIy !III �{-� I!l II I' 1i1111 11`:IL11I! III II!oo1 II !I llil''111!I11'0!i !!x: 1 ml; i' ma lnlm Y .►J 8 1Ii 111:I h11 11'!111 IIII 11 li!I IIIII IIII IINI'llll'I 111 III it Ill l' I! 1:11 I! V: .11V''alI•NI0!I 111IIII Ii IIiIII I li'gi,11i11 111IIIII IIII IIII II.�'111,1111!IIIIII 111II II,!IIII III II IIIII!1'I'I II ' 1'l O . ,_% �i IIII I I 1 I 1 I I I' 1 NI I�I I Iu11 I I I I l l!NI 1 IIII II' II fIpl!II IIII!'1 III IIIIII 'I 1 u , I 1'IIIIII IIIIII I Il .IIi l I C m 1$ I 111 1,I. I !I' I 111I11 III I N l I- J IIII IIII 1lI w Z I I 1 , I I,III n II 1 .I t ;I'r I I ,� ,Iw,4,Mu11 r� !III h 1L�y:: ll III 11 I I III 1 II,I I.III; I iIN ! IIIIi11 IIj11 lIlI1,i 11 I' 1�Ii:II III III III IL1'I !!gel 1, � ^�oryn amn4u ANY; u H 1 III III l yyl IJI 11j1 III 111 I!!IIII I III 1 .i Il Ill 1 I 11 II 11111ii11 IIII Il I 1}Elylp !IIII'L-- ..n 2 m ' + III 11I Ill' II 1 I; �II 11ii II II111111,11 i! 1 1 4a T' D C J n W�I I II I I/I!li I i$ I II II ! I U- x ma 1'.II v ' aF') lI aI 1i1I IIf I�.II 11 ,Y k a .manat'011I 1M I.flh1 11U,Orilk!ti!a NTII:All I M'1 I Iiii l!I 1 II II Y 1 ,,j r111111IN1 1 1 ++ : < . 414 ( m f41' '4 1 I! 11 1111i11 I I !I' WI 0111,1ll Ill, i'ill/ill s k , I ij �IG�lib''''' lI' IL I 111I I, ,I Ill I Il 1111111 llI i1116I' '�I ! 1,I I III : 1IIl I I I 1$ I' l I I I Ill ( S A c ' I 1 I of I' I �' I 1113 • ! 1 I ti _ :i. 184thAve SE o 5 l I l IN --_.---17, 11 . A> t.." ."1 !.': o Crt) 401 i (L i 4\ . ,- En 1 lla Q / r O. > D vm4 wZ ,3m . , -'; oa it ,, n � Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study B. Zoning The tributary basin to the Maplewood Lift Station spans three distinctly separate zoning areas. The extreme northwestern corner of the basin is currently in the City of Renton. Zoning designations in this area are CS (Center Suburban) and R-8 (Residential, 8 dwelling units per gross acre). The north central portion of the basin is the East Renton Plateau Annexation Area. Zoning designations in this area are CC (Convenience Commercial), R-10 (Residential, 10 dwelling units per gross acre), R-8 and R-5 (Residential, 5 swelling units per gross acre). The proposed Plat of Maplewood is also located in the Annexation area. The remainder of the basin is within Unincorporated King County and has a current zoning of R-4 (Residential, 4 dwelling units per gross acre). Figure 1-3 of this report identifies the three zoning areas and the different designations within each. 2 94168s1s.doc • • • • ...... .�•0:;:•° ii'i:•••°:•iSiii:•�❖::;:;.:1:�':.•:•P:S'ii�i:ice.❖:•::�!:•••s•••• \ � �T�\�� sal ivo......./11....., . ., ,.. :. lit garc.at jIJIIh ; IIHIiIlrvI .11 -f 111111k . • ..'t'^ 9IIIILTIJ 1•.............x.x..-.;........e.v.wo....----. •,te,:•mtc,44.*:-..K:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::. '''''\\\'\\\N•.s\\, Niiiiimmiiii i It I Loo ia11_ ;INMEIMISIM liElmmori ,11111111111 640 1 I., .. .,............__... } co P. 0.! ® �aa� a� , : �' - 7. ! Y; or• � • : 11111PI'l ommilial 1114,110,6- P mil - 41:"T" I maim IN" I MIN 1111111 � :`-_ �ikop -. - - J- ,`; 'limmig1`; -. , '_ ._ ®s _. Y;-� � ________..............a`may: ri \ -Srs.1-3 , I ��EE �� a'`� � ��.; - riiiim MN 11:11M311 =I 1 ,i)`- 't-! ...::-•''. •".„ 1.-:1-.-',.'`..-ff.......-.'•- ••• '----. - *--4-MI. Beismineawl lin Itko ,-.:, . i 111 ,1--- 1 , Imo" ' t-sl`,: _ it �'\ , 'ei �—4�` } ,� r. - w"SUM _VT III !� . �i�i"` `�'~ -` • " _, `� ii "t ',� 416 � • -"' '� '�,� ' `-�-.._� �� _.'I �4® en SI �,q ` ,. -z�, 1:fit c_i -- '''''" NM -�' , Y - - - -., •r�F-� 1 - ._�s.� A�A �I �tii "'.1 .v \ .\ _ `- - _ ':�1\tiJ- : -mil. '��. _ "•+� 44gg �: s.�t./ - _ .a.. Tyr P ��[:'. �� `. ~,`. \ A ! ..— \ '-" ';":.\ ii, _ 04 _� _ fir. �!��! iliw _ jSE____ 34 1~ _ � , nil i• ` . 9� , `Yl -I\J-' } �1-i , ] *�� it ®T vi11 -. isl !'.'�...� ,_ _. �• _ •\,. `T : W. ..P , iiiiiiihit...M'u , -.. ..i: , '771: am\ • ,, E____: 1!. a1 :171111-issui .6.4120 i..1 :, ill - L:VS 1 .lifa _. ( ..:„.1--... .-+4. : - -:-:::-/: ---- .• lia -! _aligl `1' Y1 •a� ,� � a a '1� del r 11 d®� ��a�a /f I - _ _r a IA t's • ��I _ • •• IEEE _ -`. - 1 MIIMI111111i:'-- m mil : , �� : ► Mk , . �,SW' iii:\'...". " ' * ' ,...- ....,.''' _ zoo �� milII 3 .. . ..:•,,.4.---V--- illri4*' mill I /di li::: . , ..-. • .. • IINNIIIIII II iliallaill Illrill,-.1. --- . hillikell'I .. . .... IBM s..11 „...11, i toot • EIRLife am -7 / . •t `�,,,� WM- ` �� iallii IMMO" �� `- , lift&• T'C.. 7 '• .....t .v ..• '.�mq}dPli R..4'.,et-r.p�'}F y ' ".' _ ' N N 1'. > t$;;;� � • yam c .``1YY!!•_39J4.T.slw. "`,;i\ k. - f�c '_r i t' �I , Icy _- Pill..f•' i INER1_11. ! MI..., '- ' --- ' '• al X•R•S �a��• '"".� 3s� 1 :. �. �.�. �� II� m ialw Ira • �I b-.-_._•� - '.�•- �� ••�:•-mil- NI El oir iii NI •J•• \ IMMO . . r� 5 LEGEND 0 �+� �1�`"� � ��1 �� 2ora�. �i ��ii V Ellin 1 -b00' l_ '>;;:4�, �� g City Limits ''"I ' 16-41 unksli� ilrile ''_' . '"• 'I - .`' 4 III ► I I III East Renton Plateau Annexation Area - /? � - �� i ��®i E - - Figure 1-4 _ „to• a `' is Zoning ' '=.'..: Center Suburban = = ' _▪ ;' Map `'' - = _- Maplewood LiftStation L. E'' 1 i 1 Convenience CommercialElla'•LPa r. • . - - I �� 1• :.$` ;c .^•y. ��MBER!� Na r O DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. • • a�®! .. r - - ;• .' ®i En ineerin Planning 4205 1481h Ave N.E. Suite 200 •— - � 44tn II 11E• •• -- iii Surveying g (425)885-7877 (425J 8 5r 7963 Fax Section II Alternative 'A' Location Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study Section II — Alternative 'A' Location One possible location for the Maplewood Lift Station is in the southwest corner of the Plat of Maplewood. The Plat of Maplewood generally slopes from northeast to southwest. A gravity sewer main will be installed within the Plat to serve the lots. The gravity sewer mains would be stubbed to 152nd Avenue SE on the east side of the plat and to SE 136th Street on the west side of the plat. These stubouts would provide a connection for future sewer main extensions to the east and to the west. If this lift station location is chosen, the desired extent of the offsite tributary basin will determine both the depth of the lift station and the depth of the stubouts for future gravity extension. Figure 11-1 of this of this report identifies the potential tributary basin to the lift station if the Alternative 'A' is chosen. The basin identified is a "potential" tributary basin because certain assumptions were made when determining the extent of the basin. First, the maximum depth of the lift station and upstream manholes was assumed to be 20 feet. This depth was chosen for access and maintenance reasons. Second, the minimum depth of manholes along the mainline was assumed to be 5 feet. This depth was chosen because the City's minimum cover requirement for PVC sewer pipe is 4 feet. Third, it was assumed that sewer main would be constructed at 0.5% minimum slope and 0.1 feet of additional elevation would be required every 400 feet. Fourth, when determining the outer extents of the sewer basin, it was assumed that future sewer extensions would be constructed only within current rights-of-way. Fifth, it was assumed that if the entire parcel could not be served (from a topographical standpoint) from the gravity main in the street, it was not included in the tributary basin. Sixth, it was assumed that the northern boundary of the basin was SE 128th Street and the eastern boundary was 164th Avenue SE. It should be noted that this analysis is approximate. The base map consisted of parcel lines and 1 meter contours provided by the City of Renton. Figure 11-1 also identifies where the deepest and shallowest manholes occur along the southern perimeter of the tributary basin. The result of the tributary basin analysis was that the Alternative 'A' location could provide service from SE 128th Street on the north to SE 136th Street on the south and from 144th Avenue SE on the west to 164th Avenue SE on the east. The total area is approximately 425 acres consisting of a maximum of 1,650 dwelling units at the current zoning for the area. To determine the maximum number of dwelling units, the acreage's for each of the zoning areas shown in Figure I-3 were multiplied by their zoned density. As discussed in Section I, the tributary basin includes most of Basin 1 and portions of Basins 2, 3 and 4 from the City's East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report (see Figure I- 2). The tributary basin does not include the Puget Colony development located north of SE 136th Street between 140th Avenue SE and 142nd Avenue SE. The Puget Colony development has an existing septic system that is failing due to high groundwater conditions in the area. The City has expressed a desire to provide sewer service to this development. 3 94168s1s2.doc Section III Alternative 'B' Location Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study Section III—Alternative 'B' Location Another possible location for the Maplewood Lift Station is in the southern portion of the King County Parks Department property located immediately south of the Plat of Maplewood. The gravity sewer main constructed for the Plat of Maplewood would continue south 660 feet through the King County Parks Department property to 149th Place SE (see Figure III-1). At the Parks Department's south property line, immediately north of the adjacent plat, a lift station would be installed. A location at or near 149th Place SE would facilitate future connection to the existing "dry" sewer system in the plat to the south. To serve the maximum amount of area, sewer main would have to be constructed along the Parks Department's southern property line to 144th Avenue SE on the west and 152' ' Avenue SE on the east (approximately 2600 lineal feet of sewer main). If this lift station location is chosen, the desired extent of the tributary basin will determine the depth of the lift station and maximum depth of manholes at a few critical locations. Figure III-1 of this report identifies the potential tributary basin to the lift station if the Alternative 'B' location is chosen. The basin identified is a "potential" tributary basin because the same six assumptions were made as discussed in Section II of this report. Figure III-1 does identify where the deepest and shallowest manholes occur along the southern perimeter of the tributary basin. The result of the tributary basin analysis was that an Alternative 'B' location could provide service from SE 128th Street on the north to SE 136th Street on the south and from 138th Avenue SE on the west to 164th Avenue SE on the east. The total area is approximately 585 acres consisting of a maximum of 2,444 dwelling units at the current zoning for the area. The maximum number of dwelling units was determined as discussed in Section II of this report. The tributary area for the Alternative 'B' location includes all of Basin I and portions of Basins 2, 3 and 4 as depicted in the City's East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report (see Figure I-3). The tributary basin does include the Puget Colony Development as discussed in Section II. In conclusion, an Alternative 'B' location would provide sewer service to a larger area as compared with the Alternative 'A' location. The Puget Colony Development can only be served by an Alternative 'B' location. However, Alternative 'B' location would require acquiring or obtaining easements over adjacent King County Parks Department property. 4 94168s1s3.doc APPENDIX Preliminary Maplewood Sewer Lift Station Study APPENDIX A - REFERENCES • City of Renton East Maplewood Sewer Collection Report by RH2 Engineering, Inc. October 1997. • City of Renton Zoning Map, February 9, 1998. • East Renton Plateau Annexation Zoning Exhibit A, March 4, 1999. • East Renton Sewer Interceptor Extension Plans by Triad Associates, February 25, 1999 • King County Zoning Atlas,February 2, 1995 94168Appendix.doc IIIIII 'NM I. iniklik _ _111104alinikti2441041111WIIV . Wilk \' 1 ` tttk �� '1 , \, lIMIK110111111'W., i A: _:.---;%;1 'IligalliallialatifiliPlinglik*.1111k , it. ..k giciwit..ft, a. ==�-- ) �� rir.-4,*-'- Mi. ''1'' ' bA.M11.1).W.ilk ikk4:01a, 1.54• '' / J;) 1 .‘w7,4,..„._ .1-1—, ii , �. �ng�l�k �99111Ilitilkilrieer21111111119M-k- lill%IbbllaillaPI .�� ;: �� km - •AT*jfILXVillik.IRGIM 1 talkelaik t1/4 Iiitilliinfillitt0„‘1%. - IL ,.,,,.,,.:, Nrikah, Ili ..lui ta et llik 'manAlLt011 iltiliki Tali r, libl _ 411%:- -- 11111-.01ritell4A'‘W-,--.-.7611r4ORIN3H- 00'.41A.' MOVIRONIENLV.-& Wilk' 'vac- '- oiling liabrfitotto .7.:7 - ,,r,-,r,,.-,,, EITMILIM kast, kird 14111 NIL Npirs.". $0031 ,71.74Fahisil ,,,.,,,,:: _.‘ ,.74riman 1 ,giiimikol k'". k' kirtrittfi% . •q'lk ' •""(-, .• ,--) astook"Evironesikk_ m. r..v • el 0 mairmer:,--7, ,-7,--,,...,Nlittbk,p1.161,0-04.,ct ! ' \-- 3' ilikLik16111116`2111L . fit.:2..1111gi Zitig./~ro. •.�� ,� �� ; 7� vises 7sl�l� ,4'�®itv '�:_ .1ys-.. .:74- -- - ._J9 ��ar�� . ,� h �.;u NI...4'w�. "^�' • pP�al, .,\i'i I i r %i '+, NE ,A t//II -.■ �� .4.1.,� r��i- •./ h�Y a 'i� ;c � ®. •, 11" ® � v�:'� `Ya��7 t '::,,,,,,-- --, 'il �� \ *i1► .R.'liii. • ryr I,�g.��gikl�l�.•..�'�-, ,,...Jam; 1__ , - i!1.� 1.{►3`i 61�:■ �/ N!kliti ,F airiNlel ' �� \ �Iailt- Vi.l511, ��Lifthk1NRAN Nitil LTC : ��►,� a � J ��, i►� .. --ik ik rim,'NM' vLi! Nal 'kw ► ! .,� ��6:�% #46Ekla� olik �.� ..�o1� l. +�� =' 11 pis �,_ _ � * 13i A '� , ' � ��i��!�i► ,1110111111146744MIthilatrlikAilaw „ ....... „,..‘. . 2. •'';fit "- �i►� `� �` ��.� �` �',.��,� � , ,s _.. -7. . ' Ilibbtoitih Al,iiitikilliarv.„.eArd,,,fr As._ii &.. .1 \ , ,,, . • ,,,,,--_--• ,,,,,„:„,, 1:51....iii,,,„i..1111:--, 1 irs-,W k, 4?"rklifSPI Illgi 1�si �4 zg� .m, \ �� '" _ II& ,\ ' 1" 1 �' '�0�� w ay � `' �� a,,,,,_egg +I �� '�� ` ��. ��i � i .`fit �` '4 ��_.®� ►, 1:. ill '44111 ikluswilakr4 ' ii �fik egil IN ;fi r®�11� : •th Li! - IA, %'�o•��z �aa;�PWril�� ® • . ., �� . -�----1 _. - _ -� �� ' "_ D ,Ij ��:��— ��0, �9��e�®fie:,® �� s,' � ►®'__,� •,e � 4►- ` . „„;rza'" -=';• 1.W,',.-: itlailii i, - - jilailk. . _i_. Ea liralk �� 10 �* ,� : 4� _ > �` Y : � �a� ems` � y 1 w � ; Imo► --, _ wt��utKu,a , iiit • '�� ' `� .,, _; "i�� N. -_' _ t' • - • - -11E- -....‘ \13ffi'orD1---' ..-- ---- . . -- -- - --- .- • . .! % 7,,,,lookili -.010 - iii,A ., ,..„,„„_ ..., . . IL 7,- -..,:t.-4.„.-. ....ax.,..aff. gui .•.. " - ';';Ii4.71:q .. ./i r'.7` 11116112 192 PM '$O�" .', '• .. 1�'`' .h Es{'?L , X '.:vto C\1 i • - - . ,\ .r ICI 41- r.Y'.� t` • � —_ d S,•S� ..gy�pp �'�S { :Yy l` - _- _ `r st_. � � � ` � . 1/ '� -- �� .- /` -�'. \,. .• . ..... 4 K P .=. ;ye - `. yr .,.'- ti_ �.i 1•-_. - ---- . 0 Rimer ' •lam: z �' -aH< - - D 11101131 -- A 72 - Pliiillitin {`-.r; ,':Lys ' ' - rF,•:"ri.;: i - �. mom �� , Lc) • < : .. �. � En in MI itsiem NMlimo 4- _ ,. --- Figure III-1 ' d; to ': ;;< t�1 " Egi wit :� �m • es, �,� '\\' ,.. Maplewood Li Station ""' xSX 'Y a^N.:: 'smug � ��• �� ` `� �® i�iliiii� i� et fl E _fral ; :, . Potential Basin y; J rni _ :tweak!: I $ , �� 1 Alternative 'B Illtra��.. • '� - - Ali �� =i _ , 1w . ' ,+ - . ' 'a ,z �� .! i 0�•�� Eemm _ =: .t�. �� ' `?� / : Location R 41e,,,ii,,t;li-LL-•, ILAN al wiraisi ,...am'--Ailkielt., lt. ., 'i '' �1 \�� nowmini MUM now--::, �� ®14" .‘ Atte ,�a �� 1..,.,...::".14..t.7....1-1.....:01.1..:1.-:18-.1 DODOS ENGINEERS.INC. '.mnal-421129gj 4711; 'Illi 500 - - � P/arming 4205 148thAve.N.E. Suite 200 '-� 11" `'' =~�~T` 144h 1 Engineering Bellevue,Washington 98007 f ..n �l J Surveying (425)885-7877 (425)885-7963 Fax I 1"=600' • i • • N . Ar ._ i --a,---,\,-.- :kikIN lbIaIIMIliNiINkaSIKlliI. , ➢kl---a-----7`•-li,o--.4k-------.-:i-\-i-,-7,1=u1-t__---N-Ii,Ii gip` 4_.1 7_ kt. _Vm li Ik'II ka. .k lifi 4 1k 14 q' k.4 1k 4N: 1!aNr , :‘,.--,..- J i :.- ..---fc-37.,.) I-7.,..:;....,: i..-. 's.,,------),,, i, J....J:77,/,: ....‘111OLL _.; . -3%,-1,WISIIIIIL, '','C' clikia .-,,_ illikiNik ik Iii,.. IN 'It% Satilk:Vh00114141fifil 1 4kNilkki CIL Ilan -11,igklk.:-.-\ II • \ I& . if l' 1144141$410 .71.-WellakVAlrOhVinhi&I.29414mmwallkignieftmitt84,4&\-:\711 ! ;`ly r� ii[ : i•`r'\\ i `` • • p - ��,,� • BELXIVAMIK4L.'IkeiVa4.\*N �; _ :::. , d� _.,__ at ... kwhi ., ( .,,,EN :k,,,,, _ ,, ,., ., , _ „,,, .. .. ,,,,,,, , , , _.....„„ ...., , .. k••••V . ,,' ki0111"1.-4;,..,w,-:-.All Mira Mil )kk. Okla • *616. k ' IP' 4g"k .'imileL rtm_Naclieektme "- stikkvei-za . - imAliNvivati trAk „....., 1301 - 'k,\•,. .-..\11101166, 6NA •,..,.‘.., 1OLVILXVOI t••. • —1-� m• t_ �'i k its• Wilk. al. 14b111119 .,.+�� _� '• lilit �• \ \ .�'��w� ,14 � y`• � ..,,J ( I �`\!!r'..... j.� -1177 �,411� 1I� `,� t`�� 1�11� � 1 � Ite' I��i►� ��t �f ®��►V�� ' , � �� _-____________....4...... �� ®►�� '\.��®�+��i�.� ).i 1 \ { , 1 / i'.maim S ��imimi. ' k.1 \. �®��'�j - + V411i �iTa' � ® �' � �� 1��j�16. ''1�:�`� -�*• ..ram. 75 n ,.\---/ MN': Illatql • ��►�� MA J ;,_ {, liam , . ...._."_ ,_„<c ,,...rfalporms mpg �'`;PEtit4 "'' �� . • ® 9a 1:�� a. j am . �'�`,„1, �3 , . _.:7,m . mikkty � ,.. _„.z..k...\.....,.. ... NmIl , . 4.04spi,f4\______-,,.. m I - ti tI : •.., . iti, 14 nssa ti� .� •. _ter �� -_ �► �;'' KV:WNXWa. lidleakRosilkIl Nii-or:-Nii-r . ''''' '1074' :' mr,,, ,...‘, 1:.f- -,..4!„.. 1‘,71.1.1. ,4.,1,..414%41011.2, 40g,11 1.4111k 4keiivattmtroias,i giIVlpitIZLit- 1 .ALE S _._ 1` ireev4'S1 .v k-sagnim.oaltallmimmonn7ik=iilCt y+kinl IN11611p.,4.l0i, '-:...0., mLeNis *Inn\- ' WI IIIIIIIII- bt' Wel Vir -4, ,-.0. - # kik, mi ifts _ -.1-- ' - . ' ' 1, 11Mettirk ''- ---' . ----7-77-1.......................-............ /*---44.4* . • 'alai's% yo'sit "-aq... AL* fig%.1 c-i- ' • .-. 2-. ",k;••-cgs,' ,, -2--,‘A.--'.---.:-A LITE 41 kr'V 5,.. '. , ---7; -7.----:-.. '- •.•:-.-';.7:::.7:-••---__._ I ..---...--..\.-tr.,• 14;..‘P.- 11.__101ALIIMINMEir.r;sx7arbifil-O -:.',.F 141 rd• um‘:• ,-•----:-..-- e ► ~ ail its .�t�„� � i. .:- :.--.• ,_ ilsomiimmiwipiummilmi.ii �; -(iglu1 � v ; _ lii . �Mi?:3T. �`�' Al }Yi:' �" _--�'1 �� !y �� \ •\ Y' , , _ r.- r_ �' < _ J: yY} 7 �� Alamog.7421223111111 .- f �, I>f' �f cr ``.- .5•!min��+s � �'+"' 2,[ '^'»�' - 1 .. � Sill �. " _ `'•• .(_�� .� ,. `1 '�' t, :: i _L. - s, map ei�I�F I u - • k -gunI • 3' mewInisiminargffi �1 '" ,zi,f= ,, . < , �:: mi.„,,,LN tt� Mid ." i� ; Figure i ;' II-1 -NA } ,`-'.v ::Ati, �` iiimaLgi 111110111111141 ;`�•. Maplewood L Station '`-h ,, � `� '� 1��_600' �" ��'9 n® Mill�� _��111111111111M NM ''armor A '� �;,' . ` , _ Potentia Basin :�-:: • � +�►. �- d �� ` � - �� •• -_ ? ` Alternative 'A ▪ °` �� ' , i r �+ arm MIN'mi� . IMP wl �� m'.am� � . -____ ._� - ipw � �r1�� -- Location -Y„ ,„ �� _ dm �� _r� Ella a •vt:tf,..t;-f§.$:•.Vrmgihr---- ^�-t=•{4'�eta . ..— �� y\�sp 1�� • �F 43,, E,�j► �;..bins 44111 Ei .misESI&J ilmiA., i. . 2•�t�=!-am �_ El ; _ �' � '`�, ,� e 'Coitlp .fl Ell APAL �� Mpg nimpail }y i DODOS ENGINEERS,INC. ''• `- zY,3i 4''-:fit -,4 �3 '"' ! • M( EMI,� o' W m• imago g ,I �.aM:_ ••`� • �7' • .'_�— r a:\ V•x-t_a _. Planning'?,.--:Y_ .� --_+b'f+',: WNW, -- "1� . �' _ ,. \ ._.- �•' - '1 w•. ''� �'� Engineering 42Beilewe,Wash/ngfon05 148th Ave.N.E. U198OO7 �' -�� ; 144 h S t. Surveying (425)885-7877 (425)885-7963 Fax 019 - 0(09 (L6) TERRA ASSOCIATES Inc. �b. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences July 20, 1999 Project No.T-2798 Mr. Ron Hughes '- i►`=n6ia ,;,,,' P �` Burnstead Construction Company 0 1\S "141° 1215 - 120th Avenue NE, Suite 201 19g9 Bellevue,Washington 98005 Subject: Wetland Evaluation/Conceptual Mitigation Plan vikeG °\I Maplewood Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Hughes: As requested, we have conducted a wetland evaluation of the property located south of SE 128th Street and east of 148th Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington. The purpose of our work was to evaluate existing site conditions and identify and delineate the limits of the wetland areas on the property. We have also reviewed project development plans to identify wetland impacts and have developed a conceptual mitigation plan and buffer averaging plan for the project. In conducting our site evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology, as outlined in the Federal Manual for Identing and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1989), as required by the City of Renton. This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near-surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included site visits on January 27 and 31, and May 9, 10, 12, and 15, 1995, during which time we completed our site evaluation and flagged the wetland limits. During a follow-up site visit on April 7, 1999, two additional small wetlands were located and flagged. Dodds Engineers, Inc. surveyed the wetland limits and plotted them on project maps. PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal conditions do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,bogs, and similar areas. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com Mr. Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 In accordance with this definition, a given area is designated as jurisdictional wetland if the hydrology results in inundated or saturated soils during the growing season, hydric soils are present, and the dominant vegetation is hydrophytic. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual(1987), are commonly known as the Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species has been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions,hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate(OBL),Facultative Wetland(FACW), or Facultative(FAC) indicator categories. Diagnostic indicators of hydric soils are related to soil saturation, which leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inhibited and soil minerals are reduced, giving characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmottled soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a hydric soil. In addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger to collect soil samples for determination of hydric soil criteria. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least one week during the growing season. If no water is present at the time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or the presence of hydric soils. Standardized data forms are available to record observations on each of these parameters. We completed data forms for the Routine On-Site Determination Method at 25 locations on the property. Copies of these data forms are attached. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located south of SE 128th Street and east of 148th Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of approximately 62.73 acres located north of SE 136th Street and between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. The north edge of this parcel is irregular,with a portion extending as far as SE 128th Street. Small parcels adjacent to 128th Street SE are excluded. Most of the surrounding property is undeveloped, although there are existing residential subdivisions east and west of the property on SE 132nd Street and on SE 136th Street, southeast and southwest of the site. Project No.T-2798 Page No. 2 Mr. Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 The site is currently undeveloped and is mostly covered by second- or third-growth mixed coniferous/broadleaf forest. Common tree species on the site include big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). Dominant understory plant species include vine maple (Acer circinatum), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). Only one soil type, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, is mapped on the property (King County Soil Survey, U. S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). Alderwood soil is described as a moderately well-drained soil formed under conifers in glacial deposits. It has a consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. The Alderwood soil is not included on the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils listing of hydric soils. Our observations of soil conditions on the upland portions of the property are generally consistent with the description for this soil type. Topographically, the property slopes from a high area at the northeast corner to a low area in the southwest corner. The northern portion of this parcel has some relief between low ridges and drainages, but the south and west areas are relatively flat. This parcel has several stream corridors and wetland areas, generally draining in a northeast to southwest direction. In addition to the wetland and stream areas, which are described below, several other locations on the property satisfy at least one of the three parameters required for wetlands. A shallow swale west of Wetland A in the north end of the property had saturated soils during a very wet period in January (see Data Form No. 2). However, the area was dominated by facultative-upland plant species, and the soil was dark brown(10 YR 3/3) with no mottles. A small depression southeast of Wetland C, near the east edge of the west parcel, had hydrophytic vegetation dominated by facultative species (see Data Form No. 14). Soils at this location were dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4)with no mottles, and in May,there was no free water to a depth of at least 18 inches below the surface. A shallow swale near the southwest corner of the property showed some surface water during a wet period in January. However, in spite of the presence of red alder and black cottonwood, the vegetation in this area is dominated by facultative-upland species (see Data Form Nos. 6 and 17). Soils in this swale range from dark brown(10 YR 3/3)to dark yellowish brown(10 YR 3/6)with no mottles, and there was no soil saturation in May. Similar locations along the western boundary of the property were located north and south of Wetland E. These areas appeared wet during the rainy season but were dry in May (see Data Form Nos. 18 and 21). Soils in these areas ranged from olive brown (2.5 YR 4/3) with traces of mottling to dark yellowish brown (10 YR 3/4) with no mottles. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 3 Mr. Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 WETLAND AREAS AND INTERMITTENT STREAMS Wetland A and Unnamed Intermittent Stream A long narrow area of wetland conditions is associated with an unnamed intermittent stream that flows from the northeast corner diagonally across the property to the southwest corner, as shown on the Wetland Location Map, Figure 2. The area of Wetland A is approximately 74,825 square feet(1.72 acres). There was surface flow along the entire length of this channel during January. There was no surface flow in May, but there was a well-defined channel with saturated soil throughout the corridor (see Data Form Nos. 5 and 7). The source of water in this stream appears to be surface water runoff from a fairly small drainage basin. West of the property, this stream flows into another intermittent stream on adjacent property, and then flows to the southeast. This stream flows into the Cedar River approximately one mile downstream from the property. Wetland conditions are present adjacent to the flowing channel for most of its length. Both sides of this stream corridor/wetland were flagged across the property. Soil samples in Wetland A were black (10 YR 2/1) with no mottles to dark brown (10 YR 3/3) with dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4) mottles. Within the stream channel, soils were very sandy and gravelly, and were bare or had some matted leaf debris. The soil in wetland areas adjacent to the stream channel had less sand and a higher organic content. Red alder,black cottonwood, and western red cedar dominate vegetation along the stream corridor, and dominant shrub species include salmonberry, willows, and hardhack spirea. Dominant understory vegetation includes lady-fern (Athyrium filix femina) and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), with some areas of slough sedge (Carex obnupta) and skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum). The slopes above the stream are dominated by big-leaf maple, red alder, salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry, red elderberry, Cascade Oregon grape (Berberis nervosa), and sword fern. This area satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), this wetland is predominantly a palustrine forested wetland, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1), and the flowing channel would be an intermittent, riverine streambed with a sandy bottom (R4SB4). This corridor is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle,USFWS, 1987). Wetland A has generally moderate functional values, primarily because of its moderate size and intermittent stream flow. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement, natural biological support, overall habitat functions, and specific habitat functions. This wetland has a low rating for cultural/socioeconomic values. Project No.T-2798 Page No.4 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D) that the wetland associated with this stream corridor is a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in area, it is at the headwaters of an intermittent stream, and it is dominated by a forested vegetation class with minimal disturbance. The City of Renton has no specific regulations protecting stream channels, but in the King County classification system, this stream channel would be a Class 3 stream because it is intermittent and has no potential for salmonid use (KCC 21A.06.1240). Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer, but the City of Renton has no buffer requirements for streams. Wetland B Wetland B is in a depression in a broad swale in the north-central portion of the property (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland B is approximately 13,414 square feet (0.31 acre). There is no surface flow into this wetland, but during the rainy season, there is flow through an outlet channel to the southwest. The primary source of water appears to be a shallow groundwater table. Soil samples in this wetland were black(10 YR 2/1)with no mottling(see Data Form No. 3). Red alder and salmonberry, with an herbaceous layer of slough sedge and sword fern, dominate vegetation. Soils were saturated at the time of our site visits, and there were areas of standing water. This area satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS, 1987). Wetland B has generally moderate functional values,primarily because of its relatively small size and intermittent stream flow. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement, natural biological support, overall habitat functions, and specific habitat functions. This wetland has a low rating for cultural/socioeconomic values. A small, narrow channel carries seasonal flow from Wetland B to Wetland C in the west-central portion of the property (see Figure 2). This channel was flowing at the time of our site visit in January. In May, there was no surface flow, although soils were saturated. The centerline of this channel was flagged from Wetland B to Wetland C. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), this channel would be an intermittent, riverine streambed with a sandy bottom (R4SB4). This corridor is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map(Renton quadrangle, 1987). Project No. T-2798 Page No. 5 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D) that Wetland B is a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in area, it is at the headwaters of an intermittent stream, and it is dominated by a forested vegetation class with minimal disturbance. In the King County classification system, the outlet stream channel would be a Class 3 stream because it is intermittent and has no potential for salmonid use (KCC 21A.06.1240). Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer,but the City of Renton has no buffer requirements for streams. Wetland C Wetland C is in a depression in a broad swale near the west edge of the property (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland C is approximately 11,707 square feet (0.27 acre). There is seasonal surface flow into this wetland from Wetland B through the channel described above. At the time of our site visits in May,there was a very small amount of surface flow from the western outlet of this wetland. An additional source of water for Wetland C appears to be a shallow groundwater table. Soil samples in this wetland were black (10 Y 2/1) with no mottling (see Data Form No. 9). Red alder, hazelnut, salmonberry, and hardhack spirea (Spiraea douglasii) dominate vegetation, with an herbaceous layer of lady-fern and slough sedge. Soils were saturated at the time of our site visits, and there were areas of standing water in May. This area satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS, 1987). Wetland C has generally moderate functional values,primarily because of its relatively small size and intermittent stream flow. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement, natural biological support, overall habitat functions, and specific habitat functions. This wetland has a low rating for cultural/socioeconomic values. It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D) that Wetland C is a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in area,it is near the headwaters of an intermittent stream, and it is dominated by a forested vegetation class with minimal disturbance. Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer,but the City of Renton has no buffer requirements for streams. Project No.T-2798 Page No. 6 Mr. Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 Wetland D Wetland D is in a small depression in a shallow swale near the east edge of the west parcel (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland D is approximately 8,996 square feet(0.21 acre). Red alder and salmonberry dominate the vegetation. There is seasonal surface flow into this wetland from the overflow from a detention pond located on adjacent property to the east. At the time of our site visits in January and May, there was some surface flow into this wetland. Soil samples in this wetland were dark brown(10 Y 3/3) with no mottling (see Data Form No. 11), but the soils were saturated to within six inches of the surface in May, which satisfies a condition to be considered a hydric soil. This data point is in the center of an intermittent stream channel that had flowing water in January. Bare soil and matted leaf debris indicated recent surface flow in May. In the swale downstream from Wetland D, evidence of surface flow disappears, and the vegetation is dominated by big-leaf maple, Douglas fir, salmonberry, sword fern, and bleeding-heart (Dicentra formosa) (see Data Form No. 13). The soil color in this portion of the swale was dark yellowish brown (10 YR 3/4) with no mottles, and the soil was not saturated. Wetland D satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS, 1987). Wetland D has generally moderate functional values, primarily because of its very small size and isolated condition. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement,natural biological support, and overall habitat functions. This wetland has a low rating for specific habitat functions and cultural/socioeconomic values. It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D) that Wetland D is a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in area and it is dominated by a forested vegetation class. In the King County classification system, this stream channel would be a Class 3 stream because it is intermittent and has no potential for salmonid use (KCC 21A.06.1240). Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer, but the City of Renton has no buffer requirements for streams. Wetland E Wetland E is in a large depression in a broad swale near the northwest corner of the property (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland E is approximately 46,567 square feet (1.07 acre). The primary water source of this wetland appears to be perched groundwater or a shallow groundwater table. There is seasonal surface flow out of this wetland across the western boundary of the property. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 7 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 Soil samples in this wetland were very dark grayish brown (2.5 Y 3/2) with olive brown (2.5 Y 4/3) mottles (see Data Form No. 19). Vegetation is dominated by red alder, salmonberry, and cascara, with an herbaceous layer of slough sedge, lady fern, and sword fern. Bare soil and matted leaf debris indicated recent inundation, and the soil was saturated in May. Wetland E satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS 1987). Wetland E has generally moderate functional values,primarily because of its relatively small size and intermittent stream flow. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland is given a high rating for flood/stormwater control. The wetland has a moderate rating for base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement,natural biological support, overall habitat functions, and specific habitat functions. This wetland has a low rating for cultural/socioeconomic values. It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D) that Wetland E is a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in area and it is dominated by a forested vegetation class. In the King County classification system, this stream channel would be a Class 3 stream because it is intermittent and has no potential for salmonid use (KCC 21A.06.1240). Category 2 wetlands require a 50-foot wide buffer, but the City of Renton has no buffer requirements for streams. Wetland F Wetland F is in a depression in the swale southwest of Wetland C, near the southern edge of the property (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland F is approximately 2,075 square feet(0.048 acre). Red alder,vine maple, and salmonberry(see Data Form No. 15) are the dominant plant species. Soil samples in this wetland were very dark brown (10YR2/2) with traces of mottling. Bare soil and matted leaf debris indicated recent inundation in May, and the soil was saturated at a depth of 14 inches below the surface. Wetland F satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS 1987). Wetland F has generally low to moderate functional values, primarily because of its very small size and isolated condition. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, water quality improvement, and natural biological support. This wetland has a low rating for overall habitat functions, specific habitat functions, and cultural/socioeconomic values. Project No.T-2798 Page No. 8 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D)that Wetland F is unregulated because it is smaller than 2,200 square feet in area and it is hydrologically isolated. It does not satisfy the criteria for any of the City of Renton wetland categories. Wetland G Wetland G is in a depression in a swale east of Wetland A, near the eastern edge of the property (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland G is approximately 1,898 square feet(0.044 acre). Red alder, vine maple, and salmonberry (see Data Form No. 22) are the dominant plant species. Soil samples in this wetland were very dark brown(10YR2/2)with dark yellowish brown(10YR3/4) mottles. The soil was generally saturated at a depth of about two inches below the surface in April, and there were some areas of surface water. Wetland G satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based,on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it is a palustrine scrub-shrub wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PSS1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS 1987). Wetland G has generally low to moderate functional values, primarily because of its very small size and isolated condition. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, and water quality improvement,. This wetland has a low rating for natural biological support, overall habitat functions, specific habitat functions, and cultural/socioeconomic values. It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations(Section 4-32-3-D)that Wetland G is unregulated because it is smaller than 2,200 square feet in area and it is hydrologically isolated. It does not satisfy the criteria for any of the City of Renton wetland categories. Wetland H Wetland H is in an isolated depression north of Wetland C,near the alignment for SE 132nd Street (see Figure 2). The perimeter of this wetland has been flagged. The area of Wetland H is approximately 1,763 square feet(0.040 acre). Red alder, western crabapple (Pyrus fusca), and salmonberry (see Data Form No. 24) are the dominant plant species. Soil samples in this wetland were generally black(10YR2/1) with dark brown (10YR3/3) mottles. Shallow inundation was present in April. Wetland H satisfies the criteria for designation as wetland based on hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and inundated or saturated conditions. Using the classification system developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, December 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States), it has small areas of palustrine forested wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1) and palustrine scrub-shrub wetland with broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PSS1). This wetland is not shown in the King County Sensitive Areas Atlas or on the National Wetlands Inventory map (Renton quadrangle, USFWS 1987). Project No. T-2798 Page No. 9 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 Wetland H has generally low to moderate functional values, primarily because of its very small size and isolated condition. Details of the wetland functional analysis are provided on Table 1. The wetland has a moderate rating for flood/stormwater control, base flow/groundwater support, erosion/shoreline protection, and natural biological support. This wetland has a low rating for water quality improvement, overall habitat functions, specific habitat functions, and cultural/socioeconomic values. It is our interpretation of the City of Renton regulations (Section 4-32-3-D)that Wetland H is unregulated because it is smaller than 2,200 square feet in area and it is hydrologically isolated. It does not satisfy the criteria for any of the City of Renton wetland categories. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACTS It is proposed to develop the property for construction of a residential subdivision, as shown on the project plans prepared by Dodds Engineers, Inc. and on the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan, Figure 3. A network of new public streets will provide access to the residential lots. One access point to the development is located on 152nd Avenue SE at SE 132nd Street at the eastern edge of the property. The other access point is to SE 128th Street via new construction on 148th Avenue SE. SE 132nd Street will be a new arterial across the property to connect with existing streets. Wetland Impacts The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetland and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Wetlands F, G, and H, are isolated, unregulated wetlands, and are proposed to be filled for construction of the project. No other wetlands will be directly impacted for construction of residential building lots. Construction of the new street network will require five wetland and/or stream crossings, as shown on the Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan, Figure 3. One crossing will be located on the narrow intermittent stream between Wetlands B and C. Crossings will be required on Wetlands A and B to allow SE 132nd Street to cross the property. The west end of Wetland E will be impacted by construction of 148th Avenue SE. Another crossing over Wetland A will be required to provide access to the southern portion of the site. Where possible,these crossings have been located at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The total area of these impacts is approximately 10,150 square feet. The road system for the proposed residential subdivision has been designed to minimize the extent of the wetland impacts and to satisfy requirements for providing public right-of-way access to adjoining properties. It is not feasible to provide access across the property from east to west and north to south without crossing the linear wetland areas on the property. There is no alternative road design which would further minimize wetland impacts and would provide a satisfactory traffic pattern within the project boundaries and which matches existing public rights-of-way. Project No.T-2798 Page No. 10 Mr. Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 Buffer Impacts/Buffer Averaging The project has been designed to provide an average 50-foot wide buffer for the site wetlands. A minimum 25- foot wide buffer is being provided between the wetland limits and the developed area except where there are road crossings. At the road crossings it is not possible to provide the minimum 25-foot wide buffer. There is an area of approximately 47,969 square feet where the buffer is less than 50 feet but greater than 25 feet in width and there is approximately 20,710 square feet of wetland adjacent to the five road crossings where it is not possible to maintain a minimum 25-foot buffer. The total buffer impact area is approximately 68,679 square feet. Additional upland buffer area adjacent to the site wetlands is being provided to mitigate for the reduced buffer width. The total additional upland buffer area being provided is 69,240 square feet. Locations of the buffer impact areas and the buffer replacement are shown on Figure 3. Buffer averaging may be permitted under the following conditions, as specified in Section 4-32-3-I of the Renton City Code: 1. Averaging is necessary to avoid denial of reasonable use of the property; 2. The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics; 3. Low intensity land uses will be located adjacent to areas where the buffer width is reduced; 4. Buffer averaging will not adversely impact the wetland functions and values; and 5. The total area within the buffer after averaging is no less than that within the required standard buffer prior to averaging,and under no circumstances can a buffer width be reduced to less than 25 feet. The proposed action for the Maplewood property satisfies these conditions. Buffer averaging is necessary to allow reasonable lot shapes and sizes in the vicinity of the wetland buffer. All of these areas of impact are located close to undisturbed areas that will be available for increased buffers. Buffer areas on wetlands near the perimeter of the project have been impacted by existing roads or sewer lines. Other than those areas, forested conditions are relatively uniform over this property, and there are no significant differences between the areas of buffer impact and the areas of additional buffer. The proposed single-family residences adjacent to the wetland buffers are a relatively low intensity land use when compared with other uses, such as apartment complexes,commercial development, or parking lots. Because these wetlands have generally moderate to low functional value ratings, the proposed buffer averaging will not adversely impact their functions and values. In the development proposal for the Maplewood site, the buffer impacts related to lot boundaries are generally small,narrow zones resulting from irregularities in the wetland boundaries. The total area of buffer impact for lot development is approximately 10, 538 square feet. Buffer impacts related to the road network are approximately 37,431 square feet. There is an additional 20,710 square feet of buffer impact at the road crossings. The total buffer impact area is 68,679. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 11 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 Sufficient space is available adjacent to Wetlands A, B, C, D, and E to compensate for the buffer areas impacted by street construction and lot development. Approximately 69,240 square feet of additional buffer will be provided in 16 areas ranging in size from approximately 231 square feet to 19,985 square feet. This buffer averaging plan will maintain the habitat value of the site wetlands. A significant feature of the buffer averaging plan is the expansion of the buffer between Wetlands A and B so that there will be a habitat connection between the two areas. This effectively increases the area of contiguous habitat being preserved within the development. Variance Request (Buffer less than 25 feet) As noted above, it is not feasible to provide the minimum 25-foot wide buffer for the wetland at the road crossings. Several alternatives have been considered to mitigate for the reduced buffer at these locations. One approach is to designate the wetland area within 25 feet of the road grading limits as an indirect wetland impact and include that area in the calculation of wetland fill and mitigation requirements. There would be approximately 9,000 square feet of impact. With a mitigation ratio of 3:1 (wetland mitigation area:wetland impacted) for forested wetlands, this would require approximately 27,000 square feet of wetland creation. Grading to create new wetland area would require clearing existing vegetation and would result in additional disturbance to forested area adjacent to the wetland. The project involves direct filling of approximately 10,150 square feet of wetland for the road crossing for which 30,450 square feet of new wetland will be created as mitigation. It would not be feasible to expand the grading for the wetland creation area without significant impacts to the site. Additional wetland creation would not result in an increase in the wetland functional value within the developed project. As an alternative mitigation for the reduced buffer area adjacent to the roadways, this area has been included in the buffer averaging calculations. This mitigation will not result in any new wetland or other site impacts and will replace the habitat area represented by the reduced buffer. This mitigation will replace the affected area with well established habitat area. Mitigation by creation of new wetland would not further reduce the wetland impact as a result of the reduced buffer. CONCEPTUAL WETLAND MITIGATION The area of direct wetland impact related to street construction will be approximately 10,150 square feet. Because these are forested Class 2 wetlands, the City of Renton requires a 3:1 mitigation ratio (created wetland:impacted wetland)(Section 4-32-6.C.3). With this mitigation ratio, approximately 30,450 square feet of wetland mitigation area must be provided. The total area available for wetland creation is approximately 36,119 square feet in two areas adjacent to Wetland A. The smaller of these areas (14,093 square feet) is at a relatively wide part of the wetland, upstream from a road crossing. This area is currently dominated by a dense thicket of Indian plum and salmonberry, with only three large alders and one cottonwood. A small ridge on the southwest edge of this area supports several large Douglas firs and western hemlocks that should be preserved. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 12 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 The larger area (22,022 square feet) is on the northwest side of Wetland A near the center of the property. This area is dominated by red alder, vine maple, Indian plum, salmonberry, and sword fern. Ten large alders and two medium western hemlocks are within this area. Relatively little excavation would be required in either of these locations to create new wetland. The areas proposed for wetland mitigation will be planted with a variety of native tree, shrub, and emergent species adapted to the expected hydrologic conditions. Potential species include Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), western red-cedar, western crabapple,red-osier dogwood(Cornus stolonifera), salmonberry, willows (Salix spp.), and slough sedge. It is anticipated that other species, including red alder, black cottonwood, and hardback spirea, will become established in these areas by natural propagation. This conceptual mitigation plan is presented for preliminary review in the permitting process. A final mitigation design based on this mitigation concept will be prepared as final project architectural and engineering design plans are completed. A final mitigation plan will identify, in greater detail, the specific patches to be treated for the mitigation work, and it will include grading and planting plans. Buffer areas that are disturbed during construction or mitigation activities will be replanted with native species tolerant of drier conditions. Potential species to be used in the buffers include big-leaf maple, western hemlock, vine maple, hazelnut, Indian plum, salal, and red-flowering currant. A detailed mitigation plan, including goals and objectives, performance standards, a detailed planting diagram, monitoring, and contingency plans, will be prepared when the site layout has been finalized and grading plans are available. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Maplewood property includes approximately 62.73 acres located south of SE 128th Street and east of 148th Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington. We have identified wetland conditions at eight locations on the property. The largest of the site wetlands includes an intermittent stream which crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. All wetlands are Class 2 because of their forested vegetation. Three of the small wetlands are unregulated because of their small sizes and isolated conditions. The proposed development plan for the Maplewood site is subdivision for construction of single-family residences on individual building lots. The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetland and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Construction of the street network will impact intermittent streams or wetlands with crossings in five locations. Buffer averaging will be used to compensate for minor encroachments into buffers to create a reasonable lot layout and for buffer impacts related to street construction. Space is available on the property to mitigate for impacts to wetlands. Project No.T-2798 Page No. 13 Mr.Ron Hughes July 20, 1999 We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Encl: Figure 1 -Vicinity Map Figure 2 -Wetland Location Map Figure 3 -Conceptual Wetland Mitigation and Buffer Averaging Plan Table 1 -Wetland Functional Value Summary Data Forms(25) Project No.T-2798 Page No. 14 aunt "" :( � y0tr I I < - �Ei L �r \ SE rii ^I` G;it/ `�� vey..�l ; �\' jr. �vsf - ytr £'YJ, '� ;, S_ JF :`ra n � � CREK 1.� 9FyON_`N �io,� °� ; COALF -re �� l S� �r it L ?• r7m sr I 11 - ST :r_.n.',Sl SE 1121N ST �. IS L I • I; ■ +[unr t 1 : :s,lc S 0 SE 112TN ) I1M �, lit a N = +>rn • v e SE�I11]TN IN U,rl k, ST r• ST3. f.;,; y��'�� so s , S-' u a y - li' 1.., i s•._ .- x SE114TN ST FS ? ' 1 c14\g4:E2. g ... tanri r II < + t u1,My� _ 0r V I �IU 4 TL ,n J��Q�III _ i60 „.s• SE _,-T 116TN ST _ T2 < <n1 • 1 SE Il7TX ST I ' 4 ITX ST v ! SE IIBr, ,Sl•l 4i I .,.i,.. .. D; an.n - _ yi •, t KIWIS h ��-•f 1 ITN, I !_ - 3 12 E.E. 0 R.t ' IN ' f` \ �V 0 !0 I s x; - E MI 1 $. T $T NQ ITN ri G"7['�7� RE 71N K 4 < SE 120TN ST -i $ ' sitST I SE 121Sr Sr - .I SE I20TN - ,'• < W1 1 d 7:11,-n�Ti � c F '1.le,in. Q. .--. cOALFTEED `-sr- i�:9'7•= 1 wwi iT- _ • 'ton R i ST 1- _` X 'ARK 4 0'• - IFcv"4:4-. -Aix ,- firn . -_SE 7NTN ST -- --------• IT� coA --- .. w.....4 = -- ! tr ST..,: yti• . ... tr' >=I SE I24TN STI _ i E.2.! .1JV. _> n.S•r .t S tt 125r1r sr, .n v N ▪ ... r<I. SE ,.•i SE i .4 r,.. N _ 12a TN 'F.1-ST n[S nl SSSd ` `' �S is ,< 126TN,.n >. < < .n In \ ,�'�^ u 12 •�a a - K'uy `' �r , sy; �.f'.t riI ST_li z z i '< 11 1R < <� S�br_.J�Ji� r`� N. •' \„ L T ?� r ao ... z x PARK d x < <I , 6 :..4TH `,� ••••4-,. .`r`~'-S1• i- SE 128TH ST '" SE =( liI 128TH $_:r—`f_�' g*RfoE E. 4!' 57 IK]RD CT- '` �• ! SE I29TN .,_!j l NI 9�'It` I ! 1 SE I3l ST� ST I CC ,..I .':. �c .SE _4__�---.PN)- ---ST _ SE 13220 ST >t —i '""rl 11 1- ! �/'" :F- `$ <I SE 172N0•SE 172ND Sr, SE 13220 I i i x ;.p•[, .- N� I7 ,CT Pi ' ; ST ! Mg ,0. i _ 1 € 'lrl--SE_./; i-1J2/ ,. ,<' 1!!!ZY ,-j = 4, t;r - ti'„ _ x it SF INfN- Sr'.:: .-iE J.� 1��++�•tt',' I7ST"11 t[.,-, a < �j l t II,rN . sT i x. r, i 14 I usM I Ilfl' is g.&1.$E® sT <' PL- 1 SE 136TN I ST •i' SE 36TH I ST I 1 1 -.SE , 2 ,, s[ 45 I:il: ,R. =l`1i;: 'TS.:..:'y r: ......... __ram_ S 1 it j_. - 17700 ST � t'..'t�� 1 KiR i E��+a...� _' , 11}_CE_ 17TN DI x $' �1 ��'i „�� , Si"d ,,,I�� ;r rs Mtn 1` �l S[178TN i[ • I`=L1BER VISEIIJBTN ST ` 4 �' • u z H r,F,�i"' _,.r" .fct ' -:st urr" S"!4�; SE I39TX R i hlS „„ I .$ M�_J 'y� s: lar, :: ''po` : PE _ `1 '^ SE I39TN Pi -$ SE" 140TH <f 1 141S7 =E. v lL PEE .. ,W x v I �+ �l Z... - SE 16IST �I!1KtiT.iS, Nl �I STla I !a: y,l E�� - I . 1 1 v i,... I ST �.•t'1�' a1' I ='� {;4'1 L_ - \•!! -1SE 142N0 ST N. z r1A y `I SE 142ND ~' y'ry":{,r„�+,1 ::;::':+'-'1 EA2ND ST-. IN N ; I .�O SE _N0 _ x ,s.:`• 1 V. -t�a��tq t�'t.g _`S SE�G 4,f.4 _ R k --' Ir �! J1 R SE I42W ST ,A'L $7 ; x rST �I V i'R.U:',Y ,A ./. EC�'`1.•YS f^ s �7.0'� !� =1_' ,k. 2v I.ra n v ' 0-SE 143 D `: ST v'-''(n' :I I' a 121z J-....S(..,.1±3 4,xn R 116ATH¢ ST _ _ $``/1I I. �,. 4E A 144TN ,"'i, =I 4 _f - ^I VI E I..¢ly�'k :'4 s. /14/.I -kEr : ..� SE14Sr` It wt SE144 i 15ai704,� I..,! 1,.' ST ., zEgo 69 f6Yllf r v yt �54 s r44 i ▪ :I , Q Z r 21' m 'S W u 46 •,R I. 'f J „ .'t3t�, \. �,y3S : g` ; n '3i g tiro• r ` t k f •i.,y1 r `bpfSQ . 'st 1Afiir-� _ i'r-'iri--Sr• c`5 m.''. �7 C n ``41 1�- 'TbS: �'• '�i �4'`� �'=y:,s •F'.�i .y Y• !D� `y4i 5}, 'N3�i 7 �f.'. \ 1� cl5"I GIs' s'+ G J ,a •.jar` y .,, a•. RENTpN r7-; '1 s, .;0f,.72k �J $x k .\ '< ''••7 • MAP 44..i.,„.4� , �y °4''es23.1 : L 3.1: , + x ao 24 •�; ka�— % f4 VA 4I'' _s, • _j:_ SE Is2D 4.l �L4t sE • � � 'I -- \ It— ` .', rr 1 ` " r C[uR r RIVER IR t47s` % a � Nt _ R s.+ tisji: RENTONw ; c , . tr G- I MAP Si.,,.. . , FA RW00L -- I ''=s ISE, .3 - \St•.l.s"w aSi :f IS9;• St ISrrw-. `-'.E.. S'• V. s: - . y�; :; I.l„.� ;[ . - t4 ' .-r p164Th ; S ; ,,,, - ! -.' ' y F. FA rc. - '4.` - SE IM,. R! q. , Ref: The Thomas Guide, King County, 1999 Edition, Poges 626, 627. 656. and 657. VICINITY MAP itgveggi TERRA Maplewood hkapasei ASSOCIATES Renton, Washington Environmental Consultants Proj. No. T-2798 Date 11/17/98 Figure 1 1 / / w r a .. , , J •- J 21 gam'. �S ��. �A — 1 — c r I -_:y. ___;:, ' I w - `/ • \1 -lOnI , / nreu ated rI. . 8 t. , e We I d • - • ��O , (rj------\-\. / . ' / 2 r a � 2 e 1 iiii10 . N-s,, _, , ( ,\,.. ,\ i . 11117 / } ' (I, C--------/F ci/lir > N. , r LI � etlaor2 / l w.a111410 , / J �"�I n/ ► Cetl9 d -r�\ iL� D rA{ / f .�- ��'.> j\ e\'---/ ei, 15r • dI Nr _. / Lj---C C 2,0euls� I. y` I !itiltnr<;J \ Mr ° ---) s// /)/) \____//r------ 2 I'l Ok.- / , _ . , .)i „id", t---"f"' -- ----- - - ---< , r( (___,_-__ 6__J ( I_ ' / ( \'''\\,--- -) ----) iikt. ). /7 ,,,, //.7- -_ i '::::::\: . ..] i la. etland E i 5 `� • a 2:1,- --\_- __, 7---- I 4 46teg f -. {-• W tland H \ C tegoryC ` / � /, U e ulated \ J 20 ,763 s I 1,707 sq.ft. !______:,_.,_)___) 4k ._:. ,. _„____ f /j' 1 -/V(----- 6 " ' N-ii-A, , 'N' ::".\\ .y / 1 Ilk - or 4________)(21 ° E`• U li =48TH AVE. S.E. �`� ( / �? - / I I� I fir : - I / ,-7' , T i .?.-. . . . p. EDI Wetland Areas APPROXIMATE SCALE 200 0 200 400 feet Approximate Off—site Wetlands •I WETLAND LOCATION MAP TERRA Maplewood • Data Point Locations 1.0essias ASSOCIATES 'Renton, Washington Ref.: Boundary and topography survey by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Date 4/27/99 Figure 2 11fili. ' I!UL1'.i\.,,e,0l1a •Ir1- 1 1 ,.r ,52ND t / i ._ ,11 1 . _4 / •irni'ggirfgga0 wN,i r 1A,...A.tK-m-Ni-l_ilrok wrfi-'4ilig1FWi aa=5"'i-WO-aiiil:-,_ iIl 1_-"liL>i_A_._I1M v 11111a0 rr,i*sas Altrro',otff,tA„m f r_mr,. _a o—urib;-aii.fi dloMP!-M=' o-l•r=ii6m7.7u-"A t t o, • 1 1' ,Ma ) ';"s may' m ' 1,i s f 1� _ice 1< 4, For-11I) r — f it .. , . .iitgro Siga ,,ett. . ,. _ . , , Nor .. ,• ,.. AN Gal ..'1 .474 . jEllaillEgik'_ ,,. ihAFESRAINEVINOWill& "At. 4.1T-a Ad illrilig 11112 gat I ) 7 -44N NIWAPMERM*7 ' '4i. I .11rni sii" MI . . ..,_j 0 A 61a .--for r \� 04.10,,,, ,,*Are/4.,•04.. ` d � .II?��111 .1. - iTilt - ' �; � �. - ,®jam �1 ��,. _ ,,.�� ri►, , _ •�_ ;, � ,,., ° 11 � 1Ji�,,maikr _Ii '/�/ °�� "• r i M11NMM►Id► �r �4,0 � elimn AVIM SPEgi rA f A 4.700 -.4tf : wA, / /,'4 '. NW IS 1 I � r ag. x, Itli,1 a' / '' �■. r �I Ili� � ` _ •III R��- Jior, 0„or ". • ,,,,*::::.,:_,_:_,_:_104__-,_ , . ,.4. ,__ -_--= EN ��. p r ��Ir romp f •fasteiv,t, _,:_.___ ' r 1,16 I pa • . " \-- )4i", ---::-4,== tin, , r,/,,, -„::::_-.-, II 111111110,4 ` ifiTtfA,,./.(,11, 44 Ulte _ . ki i*Iii, , / ' &FAS, t,°7 -. "' I Aft. v‘ or mi , ,-* s,),. .,-: . . 1 dow_ , . .,____, ;-..' •,a11160 116., '..).„41-6,. • IL.,,r-411,r zt''•:'f.., '; f. s' . - ' t-t_.,,,W . . I r \Y 4� a \ r . I SW; ''' s AT lif. kV e C ail It ‘ _,1 ' 4. le : '''' ? .::, 1 iWiCc fWO! e f : iri " . 7,... ,.. Itte. ...7 , • . itir ./ .° , AO • e /4. 1 0 t ' f ' ,, _. 4 le.---".4) W-: t";"'N)q Ink r .i ', r Iii Iiiuit � \ . �r� r ! . I 4 -.) , ',! iir • e ie. f f iiihilki-1/ LI,. ff .1 - frAl t 2\: • „•," .___...41 .\_:ki___:4_ _j 71 I 1 a in ' \ y Wetland Buffer (50ft) at Road Crossings 20,710 sq. ft. -.2 (-.._. — . K ` % Wetland Fill for Road Construction APPROXIMATE SCALE 10,150 sq. ft. Buffer Impact Area (Buffer less than 50ft) 200 0 200 400 feet ,viv% 47,969 sq. ft. I __ Wetland Creation Area • 36,1 19 sq. ft. Buffer Replacement Area (Buffer Greater than 50ft) TE R A CONCEPTUAL WETLAND AVERAGING IGPT�I MITIGATION AND I 69,240 sq. ft. ��' ASSOCIATE J Maplewood k Renton, Washington Ref. Preliminary Site Plan by Dodds Engineers, Inc. Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Date 7/19/99 Figure 3 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland A and Intermittent Stream Channel Functional Wetland Function" Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Small, near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Small, near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested, Support seasonally saturated,no fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate Narrow wetland with woody vegetation,undeveloped shoreline. Water Quality Improvement Moderate Moderate flow through site,moderate vegetative cover, upstream basin has some development,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is relatively small,high vegetation structure, one habitat type, few invasive species moderate productivity, moderate organic accumulation and export, some special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Moderate Area is relatively small,moderate habitat diversity,high sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Moderate Moderate invertebrate, amphibian and bird habitat,no fish habitat,high quality habitat for mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities,low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(2) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous(PFO1) Wetland Category Renton Category 2 (i) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al(1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland B Functional Wetland Function(') Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested, Support seasonally saturated,no fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate Narrow wetland with woody vegetation,undeveloped shoreline. Water Quality Improvement Moderate Slow flow through site,moderate vegetative cover, upstream basin is undeveloped,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is relatively small,high vegetation structure, one habitat type, few invasive species,moderate productivity, moderate organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Moderate Area is relatively small,moderate habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Moderate Moderate invertebrate, amphibian and bird habitat, no fish habitat,high quality habitat for mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities, low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(2) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous (PFO1) Wetland Category Renton Category 2 (I) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al(1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland C Functional Wetland Function(') Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested, Support seasonally saturated,no fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate Narrow wetland with woody vegetation, undeveloped shoreline. Water Quality Improvement Moderate Slow flow through site,moderate vegetative cover, upstream basin is undeveloped,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is relatively small,high vegetation structure, one habitat type, some invasive species,moderate productivity, moderate organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Moderate Area is relatively small,moderate habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Moderate Moderate invertebrate, amphibian and bird habitat,no fish habitat,high quality habitat for mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities, low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(Z) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous (PFO1) Wetland Category Renton Category 2 (i) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al(1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland D Functional Wetland Function(l) Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Small, isolated, forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Small, isolated, forested, seasonally saturated,no fish Support populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Not applicable No flow,no permanent surface water. Water Quality Improvement Moderate No flow through site, low vegetative cover,upstream basin is partially developed,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is very small, moderate vegetation structure,one habitat type, few invasive species, low productivity, low organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Moderate Area is very small,moderate habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Low Poor invertebrate, amphibian, and fish habitat,moderate habitat for birds and mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities,low aesthetic value, no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(z) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous(PFO1) Wetland Category Renton Category 2 (l) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al(1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland E Functional Wetland Function(l) Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control High Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream,constrained outlet forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Small,near headwaters of intermittent stream, forested, Support seasonally saturated,no fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate Narrow wetland with woody vegetation,undeveloped shoreline. Water Quality Improvement Moderate Slow flow through site,moderate vegetative cover,upstream basin is partially developed,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is relatively small,high vegetation structure,one habitat type, few invasive species,moderate productivity, moderate organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Moderate Area is relatively small,moderate habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Moderate No fish habitat,moderate habitat for invertebrates, amphibians,birds,and mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities, low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(Z) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous (PFO1) Wetland Category Renton Category 2 (1) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland F Functional Wetland Function") Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Very small, isolated, forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Very small,isolated, forested, seasonally saturated,no fish Support populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Not applicable No flow,no permanent surface water. Water Quality Improvement Moderate No flow through site, low vegetative cover,upstream basin is undeveloped, moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is very small,moderate vegetation structure, one habitat type, few invasive species, low productivity, low organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers not disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Low Area is very small, low habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Low Poor invertebrate,amphibian,and fish habitat,moderate habitat for birds and mammals. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities,low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(z) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous(PFO1) Wetland Category Unregulated 0) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland G Functional Wetland Function') Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Very small, isolated,mostly scrub-shrub. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Very small, isolated,mostly scrub-shrub, seasonally Support saturated,no fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate Minimal flow,no permanent surface water, sparse vegetation,undeveloped. Water Quality Improvement Moderate Minimal flow through site, low vegetative cover,upstream basin is undeveloped,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Low Area is very small,moderate vegetation structure, one habitat type, few invasive species, low productivity, low organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers slightly disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Low Area is very small, low habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Low Poor invertebrate, amphibian,mammal, and fish habitat, moderate habitat for birds. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities,low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(Z) Palustrine scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous(PSS1) Wetland Category Unregulated (I) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 TABLE 1 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUE SUMMARY Maplewood Renton,Washington Wetland H Functional Wetland Function") Rating Comments Flood/Stormwater Control Moderate Very small,isolated,partly forested. Base Flow/Groundwater Moderate Very small, isolated,partly forested, seasonally saturated,no Support fish populations. Erosion/Shoreline Protection Moderate No flow,no permanent surface water, sparse vegetation, undeveloped. Water Quality Improvement Low No flow through site, low vegetative cover, upstream basin is undeveloped,moderate runoff retention. Natural Biological Support Moderate Area is very small, seasonal surface water,moderate vegetation structure, one habitat type, few invasive species, low productivity, low organic accumulation and export, few special habitat features,buffers slightly disturbed. Overall Habitat Functions Low Area is very small, low habitat diversity,moderate sanctuary or refuge potential. Specific Habitat Functions Low Poor invertebrate,amphibian,mammal, and fish habitat, moderate habitat for birds. Cultural/Socioeconomic Low Low educational opportunities,low aesthetic value,no fish resources,no historical or archeological resources,no recreational opportunities,private ownership,not near open space. Wetland Community Type(s)(2) Palustrine scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous (PSS1) Palustrine forested, broad-leaved deciduous (PFO1) Wetland Category Unregulated 0) Based on Cooke, S. S. (1996) Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Method (2) Cowardin et al (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Project No.T-2798 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: I Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: Near west end of eastern portion of site VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species E4 al 1 Populus trichocarpa FAC T 8 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Acer circinatum FAC S 10 4 Polystichum munitum FACU H 11 5 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 75 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Small topographic depression Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for soil or hydrology Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 1/27/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 2 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbance Location: Near northeast extension of site. VEGETATION E ov, E Dominant Plant Speciescki Dominant Plant Species 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Corylus cornuta FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Sambucus racemosa FACU S 11 5 Rubus ursinus FACU S 12 6 Polystichum munitum FACU H 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 33 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: Saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: -6' Other field evidence hydrology: Center of shallow north-south swale Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? ? Rationale: Soil saturated, but outside of growing season WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for soil or vegetation Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 1/27/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 3 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbancea Location: —/0'south of TA-I, Wetland A VEGETATION o E o „, E Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species VVI 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Corylus cornuta FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Polystichum munitim FACU H 11 5 Carex obnupta OBL H 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 60 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/1 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: Saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: To surface Other field evidence hydrology: Small swale, close to surface water. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated near head of small swale, close to inundated areas WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 1/27/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 4 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: -15'NW of TA-217 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species vczt Dominant Plant Species v 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 Maianthemum dilatatum FAC H 2 Acer circinatum FAC T 9 Athyrium filix femina FAC H 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Oemleria cerasiformis UPL S 11 5 Sambucus racemosa FACU S 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU S 13 7 Polystichum munitum FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 56 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 7.5 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: None, dry. On gradual slope above wetland edge. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for soil or hydrology. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/9/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 5 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —15'SE of TA-217 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species c al 03 crp 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Thu ja plicata FAC T 9 3 Acer circinatum FAC T 10 4 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 11 5 Polystichum munitum FACU H 12 6 Maianthemum dilatatum FAC H 13 7 Athyrium fzlix femina FAC H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 86 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/1 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: High organic content, saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma, saturated HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 4" Other field evidence hydrology: Intermittent stream channel, bare soil, —6'from surface water.. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, evidence of inundation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/9/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 6 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: Near SW corner of site. —30'N of dirt road. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species ccsDominant Plant Species � c/ E3 � 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Acer macrophyllum FACU T 9 3 Rhamnus purshiana FAC S 10 4 Corylus cornuta FACU S 11 5 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 12 6 Oemleria cerasiformis UPL S 13 7 Polystichum munitum FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 43 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: None, dry. Broad, low area, looked wet in winter. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/9/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 7 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: - 10'N of TA 116 VEGETATION E o „, E Dominant Plant Species ct Dominant Plant Species z 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Rub us spectabilis FAC S 9 3 Polystichum munitum FACU H 10 4 Tolmiea menziesii FAC H 11 5 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 75 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? Yes Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: 10 YR 4/4 Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: Very gravelly soil in stream channel Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Problem area soil, chroma3 with mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Seasonal stream channel, bare soil, matted leaf debris Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Evidence of recent inundation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/10/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 8 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbance Location: —15'S of TA-116 VEGETATION E E Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species ct mac, -vim 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU T 8 Rubus ursinus FACU S 2 Tsuga heterophylla FACU T 9 Polystichum munitum FACU H 3 Alnus rubra FAC T 10 Dicentra formosa FACU H 4 Acer circinatum FAC S 11 5 Sambucus racemosa FACU S 12 6 Corylus cornuta FACU S 13 7 Oemleria cerasiformis UPL S 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 20 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Slope above intermittent stream. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/10/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 9 Site Disturbance? Close to road on west property boundary Location: —IO'S of TA-311, Wetland B VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species c„sDominant Plant Species at 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 Stachys cooleyi FACW H 2 Corylus cornuta FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Rhamnus purshiana FAC S 11 5 Spiraea douglasii FACW S 12 6 Rubus laciniatus FACU S 13 7 Athyrium frlix femina FAC H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 75 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/1 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 12" Other hydric soil indicators: Saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma, saturated HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes Surface water depth: 3" Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Broad swale with surface water. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Inundated and saturated WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/10/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 10 Site Disturbance? Close to road on west property boundary Location: —15'N of TA-311 VEGETATION E o NE Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species cip 1 Acer macrophyllum FACU T 8 2 Corylus cornuta FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Acer circinatum FAC S 11 5 Oemleria cerasiformis UPL S 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU S 13 7 Dicentra formosa FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 28 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 12" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: None, dry. On gradual slope above wetland edge. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/10/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 11 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —10'S of TA-404 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species cioctcip CID 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 9 3 Polystichum munitum FACU H 10 4 11 5 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 67 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: Saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated during growing season HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 6" Other field evidence hydrology: Intermittent stream channel, bare soil, --6'from surface water.. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, evidence of inundation, intermittent. stream flow. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 12 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —15'N of TA-404 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species t at al Dominant Plant Species a 5 c� ins 1 Acer macrophyllunr FACU T 8 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Rubus discolor FACU S 11 5 Polystichum munitum FACU H 12 6 Dicentra formosa FACU H 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC: 33 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: <50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: None, dry. Slope above intermittent stream. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland,Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 13 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbance Location: -50'down swale from TA-410 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species rtta Dominant Plant Species g 1 Acer macrophyllum FACU T 8 2 Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU T 9 3 Corylus cornuta FACU S 10 4 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 11 5 Polystichum munitim FACU H 12 6 Dicentra formosa FACU H 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC: 17 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: <50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10 Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Moist but not saturated. Center of small swale, downstream from Wetland C. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 iS DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 14 Site Disturbance? Adjacent to dirt road on east property boundary Location:Near east edge of parcel, south of Wetland C VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species v at 0� in 1 Alnus rubra FAC - T 8 2 Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU T 9 3 Acer circinatum FAC T 10 4 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 11 5 Polystichum munitum FACU H 12 6 Athyrium filix femina FAC H 13 7 Geranium robertianum UPL H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC: 43 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, EACH! or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 4/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14'' Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Small topographic depression. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of long-term inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 15 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —JO'S of TA-501, Wetland D VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species c Dominant Plant Speciesal as ct' rn `n 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Acer circinatum FAC T 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Polystichum munitum FACU H 11 5 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 75 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: >50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? Yes, 12" Mottles? Traces Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/2 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: High organic content, saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma,saturated, hystic epipedon HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 14" Other field evidence hydrology: Depression in swale with intermittent stream flow, bare soil, matted leaf debris. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, evidence of inundation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 16 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —15'N of TA-S01 VEGETATION c " E Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Speciesas 03 I Acer macrophyllum FACU T 8 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Acer circinatum FAC S 10 4 Gaultheria shallon FACU S 11 5 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU S 13 7 Polystichum munitum FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW, and/or FAC: 43 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: <50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 12" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Dry. In swale north of Wetland D. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 17 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —150'NE of DP-6 VEGETATION 0cn E o �, E ct Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species at .2 ct3 1 Populus trichocarpa FAC T 8 Polystichum munitum FACU H 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Prunus emarginata FACU T 10 4 Corylus cornuta FACU S 11 5 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 12 6 Rubus parvorus FAC S 13 7 Rubus ursinus FACU S 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW, and/or FAC: 50 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: Not> 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/6 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Shallow swale, dry. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of recent inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 . Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 18 Site Disturbance? Between recent road on west boundary and very old road with Location: Near NW corner of disturbed soils. property VEGETATION 1-4 O E o N >~ Dominant Plant Species rts Dominant Plant Species as as 1 Populus trichocarpa FAC T 8 Polystichum munitum FACU H 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Oemleria cerasiformis UPL S 10 4 Sorbus aucuparia UPL S 11 5 Symphoricarpus albus NI S 12 6 Rubus pary Torus FAC S 13 7 Rubus laciniatus FACU S 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC: 38% Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? Traces Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 2.5 Y4/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no significant mottling. HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Low area near cottonwoodw. Dry to> 18" Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of long-term inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd if growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 19 Site Disturbance? No recetn disturbances Location: -10'N of TA-635, Wetland E VEGETATION E E Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Speciesco 0 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 Polystichum munitum FACU H 2 Corylus cornuta FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Rhamnus purshiana FAC S 11 5 Sorbus aucuparia UPL S 12 6 Carex obnupta OBL H 13 7 Athyrium filix femina FAC H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC: 63 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC,FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? Yes Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 2.5 YR 3/2 Mottle Colors: 2.5 Y 4/3 Depth: 1 o" Other hydric soil indicators: Saturated Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma, mottled,saturated HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 6" Other field evidence hydrology: Broad swale, bare soil, matted leaf debris. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, evidence of inundation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road,Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/15/95 Kirkland,Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 20 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location: —15'S of TA-635 VEGETATION o 2 E Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species cts 1 Acer macrophyllum FACU T 8 2 Acer circinatum FAC S 9 3 Sorbus aucuparia UPL S 10 4 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 11 5 Rubus laciniatus FACU S 12 6 Polystichum munitum FACU H 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW, and/or FAC: 33 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: <50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 12" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: None, dry. On gradual slope above wetland edge. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/12/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd growth mixed forest Data Point No.: 21 Site Disturbance? No recent disturbances Location:Near west boundary between Wetlands B and E VEGETATION o ' E o E Dominant Plant Species v Dominant Plant Species as 1 Acer macrophyllum FACU T 8 Polystichum munition FACU. H 2 Alnus rubra FAC T 9 3 Rhamnus purshiana FAC T 10 4 Sorbus aucuparia UPL S 11 5 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU S 13 7 Pteridium aquilinum FACU H 14 1 Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW, and/or FAC: 38 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epidedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/4 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Topographic low area. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of inundation or saturation. stream flow. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates,Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 5/15/95 Kirkland, Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: Scrub-shrub wetland Data Point No.: 22 Site Disturbance? Near recent trackhoe trail Location: —6'N of TA-1-B VEGETATION E o Dominant Plant Species u 1 Dominant Plant Species Vs � c� 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Acer circinatum FAC S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Oemleria cerasiformis FACU S 11 5 Polystichum munitum FACE! H 12 6 Athyrium ftlix femina FAC H 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 67% Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Aldenvood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epipedon? No Mottles? Yes Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/2 Mottle Colors: 10 YR 3/4 Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma with mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: —2" Other field evidence hydrology: Some surface water in Swale, but isolated, no inlet or outlet. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, inundated in places. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 4i7/99 Kirkland,Washington 98034 ly' li DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2ndgroivth broadleafforest Data Point No.: 23 Site Disturbance? Near recent trackhoe trail Location: —15'S of TA-2-B VEGETATION oc,, E ° � E Dominant Plant Species u R Dominant Plant Species c o 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 Dicentra formosa FACU H 2 Oemleria cerasiformis FACU S 9 3 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 10 4 Sambucus racemosa F 1 CU S 11 5 Rubus discolor FACU C(I 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU fV 13 7 Polystichum munitum FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 25% Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: <50%FAC, FACW, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epipedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/3 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 14" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface Neater depth: - Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: —14" Other field evidence hydrology: Deep soil saturation after extremely wet winter Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of long-term saturation WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 4/7/99 Kirkland,Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: Scrub-shrub wetland Data Point No.: 24 Site Disturbance? Near recent trackhoe trail Location: —10'N of TA-4-C , VEGETATION 2CA E 9. E CZ Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species c 1 Alnus rubra FAC T 8 2 Pyrus fusca F4 C i t' S 9 3 Spiraea douglasii F4C11' S 10 4 Rubus spectabilis FAC S 11 5 Rubus ursinus E4CU I' 12 6 Polystichum munitum F4CU 1! 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 67 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Rationale: > 50%FAC, F.4OP; or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Hydric Soils List: No Histic Epipedon? No Mottles? Yes Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/1 Mottle Colors: 10 YR 3/3 Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale: Low chroma with mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes Surface water depth: —1" Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Small isolated basin with no inlet or outlet. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes Rationale: Saturated, inundated in places. WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? Yes Rationale for wetland decision: Positive indicators for all parameters. Project Name: Maplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 4i7.99 Kirkland,Washington 98034 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 1989 Describe General Site Conditions: 2nd grou7h mixed forest Data Point No.: 25 Site Disturbance? Near recent trackhoe trail Location: —15'S of TA-4-C VEGETATION f L 0 v: F N 5 Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species �a 4 c cn C7) 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU T 8 Pteridium aquilinum FACU H 2 Alnus rubra F.1 C T 9 3 Pyrus fusca FACT P S 10 4 Oemleria cerasiformis F.-1 CU S 11 5 Rub us discolor FACU .S 12 6 Rubus ursinus FACU 7 Polystichum munitum FACU H 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 25 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No Rationale: < 50%F4C, FACIV, or OBL SOIL Soil Type: Aldencood gravelly sandy loam Hvdric Soils List: No Histic Epipedon? No Mottles? No Gleyed? No Matrix Color: 10 YR 3/-1 Mottle Colors: - Depth: 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None Is the hydric soil criterion met? No Rationale: High chroma, no mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? _No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: - Other field evidence hydrology: Moist, but not saturated. Up slight rise front edge of wetland. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? No Rationale: No evidence of long-terra saturation WETLAND DETERMINATION Are wetland criteria met? No Rationale for wetland decision: No positive indicators for any parameter Project Name: Avlaplewood Terra Associates, Inc. Field Investigator(s): T. R. Strong 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Project No.: T-2798 Date: 41/99 Kirkland, Washington 98034 19 -D(o' LPG° (y) ``',u\, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT lay Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton , Washington Project No. T-2798-1 Terra Associates, Inc. 4 4 Prepared for: Burnstead Construction Company Bellevue, Washington February 3, 1999 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 Mr.Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company 1215 - 120th Avenue NE, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Subject: Geotechnical Report Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Hughes: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our field exploration indicates the site is generally underlain by glacially-derived silty sand and sandy silt soils. In our opinion, these soil conditions will be suitable for support of the residential subdivision as proposed, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into project design and construction. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. Mary Stiehler .�, Project Geologist -' iIL "�� • F. qq Anil Butail, P.E. l President likv417005 MS/AB:ts ONA . ;" PtRE. 12/9/G q -1 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work 1 3.0 Site Conditions 2 3.1 Surface 2 3.2 Geology 2 3.3 Soils 2 3.4 Groundwater 3 4.0 Geologic Hazards 3 4.1 Erosion 3 4.2 Seismic 3 5.0 Discussion and Recommendations 4 5.1 General 4 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading 4 5.3 Excavations 6 5.4 Foundations 6 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction 6 5.6 Lower-Level and Retaining Walls 7 5.7 Drainage 7 5.8 Utilities 8 5.9 Pavements 8 6.0 Additional Services 8 7.0 Limitations 9 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Figure 3 Typical Footing Drain Detail Figure 4 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (i) Geotechnical Report Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will consist of the development of an approximately 61-acre parcel located at SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE in Renton. The project location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. We understand that the proposed development will consist of the construction of a residential subdivision consisting of 144 lots. Specific design and site grading details were not available at the time of our study. However, we expect the buildings will be single-family residences of one to two stories, with wood-frame construction imposing relatively light foundation loads. We expect structural loads will be about 20 to 40 kips for isolated columns and 1 to 2 kips per foot for continuous bearing walls. Main floors will be constructed at grade or framed over a crawl space. Given the gentle slopes at the site, we expect the grading required to establish desired building elevations will be moderate. The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made, we should review them in order to modify our recommendations as required. We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design and construction. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK On November 24 and 25, 1998, we excavated 17 test pits to depths of approximately 6.0 to 11.5 feet below existing surface grades. On January 20, 1999, we excavated an additional 10 test pits to depths of approximately 6.5 to 12.0 feet below existing surface grades. Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically, this report addresses the following: • Soil and groundwater conditions • Suitability of native soils for use as fill • Site preparation and grading • Foundation support • Earth pressure parameters for basement or retaining wall design February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 • Slab-on-grade support • Drainage • Excavations • Utilities • Pavements 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface The subject property is bounded by SE 128th Street to the north, SE 136th Street to the south, 148th Avenue SE to the west, and 152nd Avenue SE to the east. Most of the surrounding property is undeveloped, although there are existing residential subdivisions east and west of the property on SE 132nd Street and SE 136th Street. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by a coniferous/broadleaf forest. Wetland conditions are present at several locations in the southern three-fourths of the property. An intermittent stream with associated wetlands crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. A smaller intermittent stream is located slightly north of the first stream and has the same northeast/southwest orientation. Topographic elevations on the site range from approximately Elev. 500 at the northeast corner of the property to approximately Elev. 395 feet MSL at the southwest corner. Current site conditions are shown on Figure 2. 3.2 Geology The Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux (1965) shows the soils at the site mapped as Quaternary Ground moraine deposits (Qgt). The unit is described as mostly thin, ablation till over lodgment till, deposited by the Puget glacial lobe. The lodgment till is generally a compact, coherent, unsorted mixture of sand, silt, clay, and gravel that is commonly termed hardpan. Ablation till is similar, but much less compact and coherent. They are highly variable in thickness and in relative proportion of lodgment to ablation till; lodgment till is generally 5 to 30 feet thick, ablation till 2 to 10 feet thick. 3.3 Soils Excavation of the test pits at the site generally revealed an approximately 6- to 12-inch thick layer of topsoil overlying glacially-derived silty sand and sandy silt soils. The majority of the site consisted of very weathered glacial till underlying the topsoil to depths ranging from 6.0 inches to 4.5 feet below existing surface grades. The very weathered till generally consisted of orange to reddish-brown, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some roots. This material was loose to medium dense and damp to wet. Page No. 2 February 3, 1999 Project No. T-2798-1 A less weathered till material was encountered below this to depths ranging from three to eight feet below existing surface grades. This weathered till consisted of mottled gray and brown to gray, silty sand with gravel and cobbles. It was generally medium dense and damp to wet. An orange and gray, moist to wet, firm to stiff, fine sandy silt with clay and some gravel and cobbles was encountered in Test Pits TP-3, TP-11, and TP-16, ranging from three to eight feet below the ground surface. Dark brown, wet, medium dense, gravelly sand was encountered from two to eight feet below the ground surface in Test Pit TP-15. A layer of orange-brown, wet, loose to medium dense, sandy gravel was encountered from three to five feet in Test Pit TP-23. Unweathered till was encountered at the site at depths ranging from three to eight feet below the ground surface to the maximum depths explored. The till was generally dark gray to gray, damp to wet, medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some cementation. More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the Test Pit Logs in Appendix A. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. 3.4 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in most of the excavations at depths ranging from 0.5 to 8.0 feet below existing surface grades. The seepage levels observed are indicated on the attached Test Pit Logs, Figures A-2 through A- 15. In general, groundwater will develop as a perched condition above the glacial till. It should be noted that the test pits were not allowed to remain open for an extended period of time, which would allow for a more detailed evaluation of the groundwater observed. Also, fluctuations in groundwater seepage levels should be expected on a seasonal and annual basis. Typically, groundwater seepage reaches maximum levels during and shortly following the wet winter months. 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Erosion The soils encountered on-site are classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (zero to six percent slopes)by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). These soils are nearly level and undulating; the erosion hazard is slight. 4.2 Seismic The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology from Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, a soil profile type of Sc should be used. Page No. 3 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically-recent deposits of clean fine- grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular friction, thus eliminating the soil's strength. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions we encountered, it is our opinion that there is minimal or no risk for liquefaction to occur at this site during an earthquake. 5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General Based on our study, in our opinion, soil conditions at the site are suitable for the planned development. Residences can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils below the upper organic surficial soils. Alternatively, if required by desired final building elevations, structural fill placed and compacted above these native soils can be used to support building foundations. Floor slabs and pavements can be similarly supported. The native soils encountered at the site contain a significant amount of fines and will be difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. The ability to use native soil from site excavations as structural fill will depend on its moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner should be prepared to import free-draining granular material for use as structural fill and backfill. Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design considerations are provided in the following sections. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious materials should be stripped and removed from the site. In general, surface stripping depths of about 6 to 12 inches should be expected to remove organic topsoil. Stripped vegetation debris should be removed from the site. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill but may be used for limited depths in non-structural areas or for landscaping purposes. Page No.4 February 3, 1999 Project No. T-2798-1 Once clearing and stripping operations are complete, cuts and fills can be made to establish finish grades. Prior to placing fill and to prepare building and pavement subgrades, all exposed surfaces should be proofrolled to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. If excessively yielding areas are observed that cannot be stabilized in place by compaction, they should be cut to firm bearing and filled to grade with structural fill. If the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive, you could consider using a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, in conjunction with structural fill. A minimum of 18 inches of clean, granular structural fill over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. A representative of Terra Associates should observe all proofrolling operations. We also recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify stable subgrades. Our study indicates that the native soils contain a significant percentage of fines (silt size particles). These soils will be difficult to compact as structural fill if they are too wet or too dry. Accordingly, the ability to use native soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions when site grading activities take place. If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months, or if they are initiated during the summer and extend into fall and winter, the owner should be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose, we recommend utilizing a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements: U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing 3 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4-inch fraction Prior to use,Terra Associates, Inc. should examine and test all materials proposed for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this ASTM standard. In non-structural areas or for backfill in utility trenches below a depth of 4 feet,the degree of compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. Page No. 5 February 3, 1999 Project No. T-2798-1 5.3 Excavations All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches, must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements. Based on current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, site soils would be classified as Type B soils. Accordingly, side slopes on excavations greater than 4 feet but less than 20 feet in depth should be laid back at a gradient of 1:1 ,(Horizontal:Vertical). Alternatively, utility trench sidewalls can be supported by a properly designed and installed shoring trench box. The above information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants and should not be construed to imply that Terra Associates assumes responsibility for job site safety. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. 5.4 Foundations Spread Footings Residences may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils or on structural fills placed above competent native soils. Foundation subgrades should be prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. Foundations can be dimensioned for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable bearing capacity can be used. With the above bearing pressure and the anticipated structural loads, we estimate total and differential settlements of about one inch, and one-half inch,respectively. For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.3 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the sides of the footings and buried portions of the foundation stem walls can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation, as it can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value includes a safety factor of 1.5 and assumes the foundations will be constructed neat against competent native soil or backfilled with structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction Slabs-on-grade may be supported on the subgrade prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Immediately below the floor slabs, we recommend placing a four-inch thick capillary break layer of clean, free-draining sand or gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slab. Page No. 6 February 3, 1999 . Project No. T-2798-1 Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, an eight- to ten-mil thick plastic membrane should be placed on the capillary break layer. The membrane should be covered with two inches of clean, moist sand to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. 5.6 Lower-Level and Retaining Walls The magnitude of earth pressure development on lower-level or retaining walls will partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, the backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, wall drainage must also be installed. A typical recommended wall drainage detail is shown on Figure 3. With properly placed and compacted wall backfill and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf. For restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be added. These values assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no other surcharge loading, such as traffic, sloping embankments, or adjacent buildings will act on the wall. If such conditions exist, then the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section of this report. 5.7 Drainage Surface Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend providing a minimum drainage gradient of three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the residences, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. Subsurface We recommend installing perimeter foundation drains adjacent to all structures that have their main floor framed over a crawl space or constructed at grade at an elevation equal to or below the final exterior grade. If the floors are constructed at grade and elevated above the adjacent outside grade, the owner may elect to eliminate the foundation drains, provided positive drainage is established away from the structure perimeter. A typical recommended drain detail is shown on Figure 4. Subsurface drains must be laid with a gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to a controlled point of approved discharge. Page No. 7 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 5.8 Utilities Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association (APWA) or City of Renton specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. As noted, soils excavated on-site should be suitable for use as backfill material in dry weather, provided the moisture content can be controlled to facilitate proper compaction. If utility construction will take place during the winter, it will be necessary to utilize suitable wet weather fill for utility trench backfilling. 5.9 Pavements Pavement subgrades should be prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Regardless of the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and relatively unyielding before paving. The subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The pavement section is dependent on the supporting capability of the subgrade soils and the traffic conditions to which it will be subjected. For traffic consisting mainly of light passenger and commercial vehicles with only occasional heavy traffic, and with a stable subgrade prepared as recommended, we recommend the following pavement sections: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC)over six inches of crushed rock base (CRB) • Two inches of AC over four inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) The paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) specifications for Class B asphalt concrete,ATB, and CRB surfacing. Long-term pavement performance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly-drained pavement section will be subject to premature failure as a result of surface water infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their supporting capability. To improve pavement performance, we recommend surface drainage gradients of at least two percent. Some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement surface should be expected over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to seal cracks when they occur. 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc., should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the project design. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Page No. 8 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 7.0 LIMITATIONS This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc., and was prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is intended for specific application to the Maplewood project and for the exclusive use of Burnstead Construction Company and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from the test pits excavated on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc., should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. • II Page No. 9 uNSETN 3 6 , .4.,,,q' ;-, r 0 TV ' < ^I m SE 5; sf �� \ I K�.M,� F�\ r : 6�v s =Itt W 'so VALLEY RFy� ,,,,, Sr '� 1 u.x,.xl _--� , F.p �> 31 \)18\ e:,,.C?1,,T ARK pf.L.1 -'. 3 sE \t il --i t'v'''K i .y10 `SSPD ' SE i11rN Dl'v.uL-A'7. a. _. \ COAL F -det ST 8 N r D `F r r loD In SE 112T4=�ST u urn n f SE 112TN $T fs i�, 4300 1S50o s.9 SE 1I2TH Sr "-LA R xxfE xE UM t ,zI 0L11, M sS�i S, ilia, "Lf IN iMlq sr 1 N42 N i u"- �`g_I SE' 117IN Q.4. Q�/,49,/,• l /Ay//� —y ii N II ♦� F'r r ( NS x e\q .�7 a ST ^�` 0 '7 ? N SF V I > r ‘ �> I a1 ■ < 5 F SE 114TN ST o c R e ~ ��iSSS ,[c I R xE OM r i`I G a 7 Cr Y 1 M u '�. W`r 1I L NE IO1X U ,A, ST •`9Mn'Nli Y Sa.E' " Wm �� <r so 116M ST 14.900 ` MxfE ` _14ioo SE _41 .TN ST S1 >! ><l� 900 am) RH PL X xE II E^: '^"'� T SE 117TN ST 6, As .. ' K „9TH 5T l , SE 118tr,.t F.' it CJ 'r O u ST �( NE IN s 1 R 1 i v0 lb ST NE BTH ST 1 " ST' < 'ST TM 7iMli ME 7TN DE 4 < SE 120DI ST -I 1� �E./ P �l SE'121ST Si \'' TZST 2NE xf 1M 9 SE 120TH '- x[ �T jE•,122xD I �S• COALFIELD - 5T 11r V\ p Np6 , rOx vt 7f I S7 ffi 7l RARK 1 c}.r NI P. - •, _SE 124TH F SE 124TH $T! _ <� _ „�` xt NE SiN %< W SE'j I2STN ST f 'r g A-4 c ST $ ' H i I +N '" N sf I,rf, y _SE 124TH 1_ST xf iM r -' < G< SE I 15TTN i < ro, < ... ,1 12 a g :1 .1 -<a s ` `I 11 s < F N = $ v1 �1 RARK 8 a< 1 4TH ST = SE 128TH ST SE . "i 128TH R Si`-�'" $�RIDE -/ ;l''' <'4100 I l4coo 1.. ., 15EJ0 I ST NE 3R0 R - c j SE 129TH PL u �' FS L iX ^gi'nni 1 >� ( '1 ! i4, �_ / `SE r r.. ,_ SE 171ST 5T<u: (= ...,2No I V SE Isis_ 132ND `' ST SE 132N0 ST ' a t-_. e7 ,! 15 ll0ro i sr a''tT < RE�g g E u2x0 5` $E 81 D u"r' SE i f ill i 3C Q it, Y S�1 SM• 1 44• I <�SE 114TN^ ST E <i<( SE 134TN ' igi E 31 R -sf l� aj SC m1 A of E* Ili Si _ , y 14 �,y� i� i Aj^$E 135TN $ } SE)�2ND .t PL 1 $E 136TH! ST _ ___ 76TP E'11 "( r "III(SE _t 136TH �ci. I _ ,SS A' sf 1 iE, Ms 1100 : 4,Th'e''Z•i, 1 1 . 00 $ F: 17300 -- gi `� 1 ! -.a .ski-. ` i $ � 13 S ��®�� ,.� x >, $E 1lBTN , SITE �1� =SEI ♦ Q , p "�{r`Du1' gv <' USER~ 'F1^M� i k0� �.if�InM��0,+4�` SE 139TH $ i HS 1—- -"J SE N160N� ` )•5F =' aLle,v " WI - i1, W SE v, 140TH ST < 1 —_ 141ST 8.1-M't d xi SE 141ST '"1'4'. 3 S fSt SE L 142ND ST Li / S.T. Y;SE 142f0 5i' r f �O SE 142N0 6, ? < $E< 1 S4. l y i SE!fin: d psi,.p.t; t SE 142N0 57 �A'L p $T 142ND 5T ~ MARLEMGY : -� ♦ S'3 C^ .!SE 2.�usxo.R 'E -I,.V, ,(...1.0 El % S�Q�'SE 143'r : ST 1140 K g(i1 (= I P. i •qr�1144TH` `-I s. .Y a N SE 144TH t al- 2+ -~ e L__--_ J 'N l x 1,r ST os, �'H'}.� nP4Rir L� SE l4f .r ^/� St NNE,, b �■r•,{!�„,--- �t" 169 GOLF A%i r : :s -� , ( > �/ �i"" '< sr;a r ! J „E,Nn 4sn,, } :I a i' l,k• i ISH-AND �' , a I *, x 1Y_ i d i ale «�E CLIB .^..�Q y'tN .Y_ CObeS£7 yY ,�, Ie�I' .R� 1tti t1,a vt :NS'-'eN �• MID i '• '3" ;:.1ry Q "u 1 ,. , ,, '�"' ��ES RL Z` 1".1 l se:: E 1$ - 10.E A Jtq s EED CEn4a \ +ts, �� y4, -y � zt6ar,^'p9i 'F 0 `-1-/ l �R 22 4: *RIPER A.. V� r� pK` RFNTO RIR REGIdLLL J f , ✓J' N h1ApEg,y �RARK h °NFs23�� n 24 ! ( �y�"''`' .it'Q ` sF 112 D Y R - opyN. Ef' y'4e ' �t.,g RD 22�(r '--�a..Ar I R_ i 1""Noolib..._79� , .•r• J ��, v :: LJL „� SE r. ��,RIVck_: �-- y " is, ` " '4 h s �St a ? 156 RIVER s" s,A 4 C`4,-.- ^�, , rc, sr o'�a-- -4 RENTON g. ''r,;'SDM`S1 i:AI RWOO ''`ic ;�M ,ssr °E SE ISSN PE a S^ �7 SE 160fN%Y a' if IS.% ,5911. + S ' SE 161Sr Pt S t'SE MO `M 0 ,, V 1tA. ' way L "',.:. se . P t REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 626, 627, 656 AND 657, 1999 EDITION. VICINITY MAP mislefil TERRA MAPLEWOOD b. 6;frui ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON �' Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 1 1 1 i T o I Iv F - rirmillimill ii J r _ _ • _,' ` vacL 00 N %TP 13 39 31Y arm' ° 1 :1 / / A SiTP-16 (/ i TJi4 , , III `116 ' ll7 `� 1k IP s\\I�3 �� yr i4° �` / 5 .-1--- 7--- ,, 1 , . TP-14 ISi ..-4„..1 4 1 . 51,5 47 ' / / / _ A4..,Z_Al/ 17icts, ( <„ 1 „ ry)..- , II* _.: , Iv' , ii-- ,. lit . / • I' / ..17::-..----/ , . 1 . r-r / 1,4/ - Iv ' '�� /`o. -ili 1:: � `�' Is ,�� `y— ._ /• Z / - '�6 TP-1 r `, / Ito ill' Ity ; J/� �00 1°" / - r '- ma}i i'a.n.tr oo 14-. W 4? 1 71S1 X ` \'_ __ L_ /` �o - �! �00 97 �+ � 3g I %� I Xi v I / z / �r � P 2 fir/ .�.»l , _�r`—,� �� {\.:_ :4.46 t° '�- j l_z*e. �M \ �� 9 I /� yt / * '°y r t ;51_81467_i� / TP'20_ _ 44 47 �d ./�/ • 1 �� / /,),' `' ;fir o L-- _ il �� I tt".._ - c \_. �° s� d ;' %/ �O ro /� �► .. '/ .111110-07 , \_ C)/ \ \ ~ C/1/4< TP 10 r / t 17 • go/ --,—__. I TP 18 % 7. °� 1�V51-►77 rtl LJ i `r hHonYel — sC. - _ ^� . a MP�i ' ;y ! t I / 1 , . ,/ .TP-17 I/t TP-21 51 .,t/ Pilef p, ��• \ r�;ttl 7NI j / / a �� , 3 I • i }, . iq .b '/b7 :/w • vti , ' yv ' 74 TP-23B — ' MY- _ v I. — _._.fi //_ ,,,, :;P-191i /1 /1 H m 1 I ' " ' ,e- v/ ...\ t-7 7,.\ . ....._, \ ,, ....4._74. 04., . „.., / //, , __.. rt.„ — ► i�"or — —y T P 6 t— - ss Fo,x 90 , / �; 11 OCR ?�. \ I. 47 �•�j' t- 57 cif fJtf7�//}-t- / / i it �'1� \�+ x\ \ ;6_ ;8 A79` qr - e`bs g� 54 / j' / ,--\�'"' TP-22 17 �. /' h.. I Ai s_TP-2 I / / 431c 81 / p� *4 *; 1 472, --,7'.\ ' . K -' ,• P j3LL IL.00 N / V /i 4 ' 7 �� ) 0 . I , I .. I Al '° /' " '. ` -� / 5 •/s TP-27 8 \ ✓ . � TP-1 � • w \ •� •� �'/ �,L,1 �. x ��` so ' TP-7 ,�.o soi,,:a.gai iii 0-7:..y..1z. iv\.\\ , .i,e,/ 49 Is ____--- , -5), \- / I VIIIWIP I ""' 1P ,40 1:: , q �� ►� �1. /><:to e v �tts1 ivT,A--y 1: it T Is-72i 6,./. \b,_c ,7-„4,,\- f �Jo / -TP 5 , TP-25 r i►� !� 1C. TP 3 + iL i�...� \ it . \ • 1: ,751-:.iNl'7• 1s V. / - / 1 I + y y 1 \ • \ ramp . A 3.ri,a.00V gaol' _11 -�. .N TP-24.1._ _ . \ 1 , / 1tI 1..--4.• **at•i-... .., _ ,_ i// •'�T 34'3�1d hf181'1 ,/ LTLQ.L /� T / \ "_}6ri.fil.00 N — // r Q Jr ^t a t-. F 3o I so O APPROXIMATE SCALE LEGEND: REFERENCE: 200 0 200 400 feet IS APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN PREPARED AND PROVIDED I — ` — — — BY DODDS ENGINEERS, INC., JOB No. 94168. EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN w#811TERRA MAPLEWOOD 611'ris ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 2 12" MINIMUM WIDE --- 3/4" WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN 12" \ •T. • .. .:.. 0:11:::t. ...• •• • .. ' . ..,. . .-. ..i.. .... .....•••• • • :.- .. ,:- ... ... . • r. �o = ,,, EXCAVATED SLOPE V:i:il. • • • • • - (SEE REPORT FOR ." APPROPRIATE Wii • INCLINATIONS) `'g 1, COMPACTED STRUCTURAL tigi - BACKFILL \\Viiik .•• .. • •. .. , •.• •- ....'7 i i, ,, /,. A. i. .N. . NIK ..;%'��: .• LWV 12" OVER THE PIPE 4 DIAMETER PVC 3" BELOW THE PIPE PERFORATED PIPE NOT TO SCALE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL sistorna TERRA MAPLEWOOD knalfrutusl ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 3 1 !I BUILDING SLAB a e° . ° ° n o ° 4 • d v ...• / //\//\// \ e COMPACTED : . V < STRUCTURAL 7 • • . e :,.: ;•BACKFILL \ . `<,. // e • d • /• //\\///\///\///i//\//A A ) // 4" PERFORATED PIPE 3/4" WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL NOT TO SCALE II TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL is TERRA MAPLEWOOD \ ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON hitst' Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton,Washington On November 24,November 25, 1998, and January 20, 1999, we performed our field exploration using a rubber- tired backhoe. We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating 17 test pits to depths of approximately 6 to 12 feet below existing surface grades. The test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The test pit locations were approximately determined by measurements from existing property lines and surveyed stake points on-site. The Test Pit Logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-15. A geologist from our office conducted the field exploration and classified the soil conditions encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the Test Pit Logs. Grain size analyses were performed on fourteen of the samples, the results of which are shown on Figures A-16 through A-22. Project No. T-2798-1 MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL Clean GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no GRAVELS Gravels fines. CO 2 (less than GP Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or O 0 N More than 5% fines) no fines. (.0 w�' 50% of coarse Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non plastic O .` a larger than No. � fraction is Gravels GM fines. W a) z E•� 4 sieve with fines GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. 0 0 0 S N Clean SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. o SANDS Sands WC Z (less than Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no c c More than 5/o fines) SP fines. O m_c 50% of coarse o+' fraction is SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. U 2 smaller than Sands No. 4 sieve with fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight J • 0 SILTS AND CLAYS ML plasticity. a)o O -N CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). cn E o a) Liquid limit is less than 50% w o• 0 Z•N OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Z_ to as a) Q c- ai MH Inorganic silts, elastic. 0 r `a) SILTS AND CLAYS CO a) CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. z o of Liquid limit is greater than 50% 2 OH Organic clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS w Standard Penetration Density Resistance in Blows/Foot 2'P O OUONTSSAM PLERIDE DIAM ETER SPLIT Q I S m 0 Very loose 0-4 T 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER o Loose 4-10 — OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER Medium dense 10-30 z Dense 30-50 Y WATER LEVEL (DATE) Very dense >50 Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Standard Penetration Pp PENETROMETER READING, tsf g Consistency Resistance in Blows/Foot DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot U Very soft 0-2 LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent o Soft 2-4 1-- Medium stiff 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX Stiff 8-16 Very stiff 16-32 N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot Hard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM e TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-1 Test Pit No. TP-1 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 , TOPSOIL;dark brown, sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SANDwith gravel and cobbles,damp, - organics. .(Very weathered till)(SM) - Brown and gray mottled,silty fine to coarse SANDwith subrounded gravel - and cobbles,somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) 15.8 _ 1 _ Gray silty fine to medium SAND,with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(SM) 10— 11.2 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. Groundwater encountered at 7 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-2 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Orange-brown,siftyffne SAND,trace medium to coarse sandandgravel 32.4 - and cobbles organics,loose,damp.Vary weathered till)(SM1 - Gray and brown mottled,silty fine to coarse SAND with subrounded gravel 12.3 - and cobbles,somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _ Gray siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 10— 7.7 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS mewl! TERRA MAPLEWOOD b�� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON idiGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-2 Test Pit No. TP-3 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture ent nt (ft.) Soil Description i Conn 0 TOPSOIL;Dark brown,sandy SILTwith organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel,and 55.5 cobbles,organics,loose to medium dense,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) 46 Bright orange and gray fine sandy SILT with clay,stiff,wet. (ML) 31.6 LL= 5— PL=31 PI = 15 _ Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(SM) 1 0 11.3 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at3.5feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-4 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(n) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium sand with coarse sand,gravel and -\ cobbles,organics,loose,damp. (Veryweathered till)(SM) - Gray and brown mottled,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles, - somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 15.8 5 - Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and _ cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(ML) 10— 11.5 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. Groundwater encountered at 4 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�``�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD t �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-3 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content %) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SlLTwith organics,moist. (MLA Reddish-brown,siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 29.5 cobbles,organics,loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,some 13.9 clasts of somewhat cemented fine sandy SILT,medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _ Gray,siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand and gravel and cobbles, dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 11.7 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-6 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(n) 0 _. TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILTwith organics,moist. (MI4 Reddish-brown,siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 38.2 -', cobbleszorganics,loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SMZ Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 13.5 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _ Gray silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel,and cobbles, _ dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 12.4 10— Test pit terminated at9.25feet. - Groundwater encountered at 7.5 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-4 Test Pit No. TP-7 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) 22.1 Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, - loose,damp. (Veryweatheredtil)(SM) _\ Gray and brown,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) Gray,silt fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,dense,moist. 5— (Till)(SM) 12.0 Test pit terminated at 5.75 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 10- 15 Test Pit No. TP-8 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(%)nt 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILTwith organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, - loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) _ _ Gray and orange,siltyfine to coarse SAN D with some clasts somewhat 11.5 cemented,with gravel and cobbles,loose to medium dense,moist. — 5 (Weathered till)(SM) -" Gray,silly fine to coarse SAlc1Dwith-gravelandco5bles,dense,moist. I1YTSM1 12.9 _ Test pit terminated at 7.75 feet. Groundwater encountered at 3 feet. 10- 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�`�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD t �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-5 Test Pit No. TP-9 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content (D�O) 0 \ TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddishbrown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 23.1 - loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) _ Gray and brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 10.9 5— - Gray,silty,fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles,dense,damp. - (Till)(SM) 10— 15.9 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-10 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(t nt 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SI LTwith organics,moist. (ML) Dark reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND,with gravel and cobbles, - organics,looseLmoist. (Very weathered till)(SM) 40.5 - Gray and brown,silty fine to medium SAND,with coarse sand,gravel and - cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,moist. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) 14.1 Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles,dense,damp to moist. (Till)(SM) 10.8 - Test pit terminated at 8.25 feet. 10— Groundwater encountered at 3.5 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ``�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD om 's ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-6 Test Pit No. TP-11 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,roots, 18.4 - loose to medium dense,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) 7.8 5— Gray and orange,fine sandy SILTwith clay,gravel and cobbles,firm to stiff, - moist. (ML) LL=30.5 V25.3 PL=24 _ Gray and brown,silty fine SAND with clay,gravel and cobbles,medium dense PI = 7 1 _ to dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 21.0 • - Test pit terminated at 11.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at 8 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-12 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(%)nt 0 _, TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILTwith organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel,cobbles,organics, 31.1 - loose,moist. (Very weathered till)(SM1 - Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 5— 10.6 Gray,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,medium dense to $5 dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 10_ Test pit terminated at 8.75 feet. No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-7 Test Pit No. TP-13 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content(ova) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel,cobbles,organics, -', loose moist. (Very weathered till)(SM1 - Gray and brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,loose to medium dense, 12.5 - wet. (Weathered till)(SM) 5— Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles,dense, - moist to wet. (Till)(SM) 10.2 10— Test pit terminated at8.75feet. Groundwater encountered at 1.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-14 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content nt 0 TOPSOIL;darkbrown sandy SlLTwithorgganics moist. - -Dark-reddish brown,siltyfine to coarse SA1'lDwith gravel and cobbles, organics,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose,damp to moist. 21.9 (Very weathered till)(SM) _ Gray and brown,siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 6.9 5— _- Becomes more cemented and dense at 8 feet. (Till) 13.4 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD k �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-8 Test Pit No. TP-15 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 , TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) - Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 34.8 -, loose moist. (Veryweatherecl tiff)(SM1 - Dark brown,gravelly SAND,trace silt,medium dense,wet. (Weathered till) - (SW) 5 8.5 Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with gravel,and cobbles,coarse sand, 11 0 - dense,moist to wet. (Till)(SM) 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - Groundwate seepage at 2 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-16 • Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(tent 0 , TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,loose to medium dense, 11.2 - damp to moist,roots. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Gray with orange mottling,fine sandy SILTwith clay,coarse sand,gravel and LL= 18 5 cobbles,stiff to very stiff,moist. (ML) 14.2 PL= 14 P1 = 4 Gray silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles, - dense. (Till)(SM) 7.7 10 Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS 111111111111114 TERRA MAPLEWOOD �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON imiGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-9 Test Pit No. TP-17 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content(%) 0TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 30.6 . loose,damp to moist. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Gray and brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 12.6 cobbles,loose to medium dense,damp to moist. (Weathered till)(SM) 5— _ _ Becomes cemented and dense at 8 feet. (Till) 10— 14.6 Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-18 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C( o)Content 0 Topsoil- Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 40.9 ---Reddish-brown,moist,siltySANDwith gravefand cobbles,loose. 29 2 Y _ (Very weathered till) (SM) - Gray, moist, silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles,loose to medium 11.6 _ dense. (Weathered till) (SM) Becomes cemented and dense at 4 feet. (Till) 5- 10.3 - Test pit terminated at 7 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 1.75 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-10 Test Pit No. TP-19 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content 0 Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 64.4 —Freddisfi-brown,moist to wet,silty$AFTD wiTfi gravel andcobbTes,loose. 31.8 Y _.__plery_weatberediUl)_4.SM)_ Gray,damp to moist, silty SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to - medium dense. (Weathered till) (SMj 11.3 - Some cementation at 3.5 feet. 5— Becomes dense at 5 feet. (Till) 11.4 - Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 1.25 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-20 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(%)nt 0 Topsoil-blackish-brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 33.1 Reddish-brown, moist to wet, silty,fine to medium SAND with coarse 28.1 1 sand,gravel and cobbles,loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) Gray, moist,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand, gravel and 13.1 - cobbles, loose to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5- - Some cementation, medium dense. 9.7 Test pit terminated at 6.75 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD �``��9 6 �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-11 Test Pit No. TP-21 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(, 0 Topsoil- Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 30.3 Reddish-brown, moist to wet, silty fine SAND with medium to coarse = sand,gravel and cobbles, loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) 30.9 - Gray, moist,silty fine SAND,with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium 13.5 5— dense. (Weathered till) (SM) Some cementation at 7 feet, medium dense to dense. (Till) 14.6 10— _ Test pit terminated at 8 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-22 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content o 0 Topsoil-blackish-brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) _ 28.2 Reddish-brown, moist to wet,silty fine SAND with medium to coarse sand,gravel and cobbles, loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) 22.1 7 17.0 - Gray, moist,silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium 5— dense. (Weathered till) (SM) Some cementation at 8 feet, medium dense to dense. (Till) 10.2 10- - Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - Groundwater seepage at 2.5 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�`�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD l�� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-12 Test Pit No. TP-23 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 _ Topsoil- Dark brown, moist,very silty SAND with organics. (SM-ML) 26.6 - Reddish-brown, moist to wet,silty,fine to medium SAND with coarse 25.6 sand,_gravel and cobbles,loose. [Very weathered till) (SMj 1 _ Orange-brown,wet fine to coarse sandy GRAVEL with trace silt, loose 11.4 5 to medium dense. (GP) - Dark gray, moist to wet,silty SAND with gravel and cobbles, medium 13.2 _ dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 1 0_ Gray, moist,silty fine SAND with gravel,cobbles, medium dense. (SM) " Mediumdense. 13.1 - Test pit terminated at 11.75 feet. _ Groundwater seepage encountered at 3 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-24 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture(ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 Topsoil-Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. 1_ML) _ 33.0 Reddish-brown, moist,silty fine SAND with medium to coarse sand, 31.1 ---gravEtand_cnbb ,_r lesants-__Wery_weattererllitl)_.(SM� 1 _ Orange and gray(mottled),moist,silty fine SAND with gravel 22.5 and cobbles, loose. (SM) - Gray, moist, silty fine SAND,at 4 feet some cementation and medium 11.5 5— dense. (Weathered till) (SM) - Less cemented at 6 feet. Medium dense. 14.4 10— Test pit terminated at 8 feet. _ Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�` �� TERRA MAPLEWOOD 6�� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-13 Test Pit No. TP-25 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(ono) 0 Topsoil- Blackish-brown, moist to wet,sandy SILT with organics. (MUOL) 69.2 1 _ 18.5 Dark gray,silty,fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles, moist, loose to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5- - Becomes more cemented and dense at 6 feet. (Till) _ 14.3 10 _ Test pit terminated at 8.75 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 0.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-26 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 Topsoil- Dark brown, moist to wet, sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 58.2 1 Reddish-brown,wet,silty fine SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 46.6 '_col?hies.hose.__OLery_weatheredtUl,1_GSM) Gray, moist to wet,silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to - medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 14.5 5— - Becomes a little more cemented, medium dense. 10 Medium dense 14.9 - Test pit terminated at 11 feet. - Groundwater seepage encountered at 1 foot. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�`�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD 11 t � ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-14 II Test Pit No. TP-27 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 Topsoil-Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 43.3 - Reddish-brown,moist to wet,silty SAND with gravel and cobbles,loose. 21.6 (Very weathered till) (SM) Y _ Gray, moist, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose 15.3 to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5— Less medium sand and gravel. Medium dense. 12.7 10— Test pit terminated at 8 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS emil�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-15 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ w cn w \\ \\\\ \ -� IV P 0) O 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 CDO V 1 OON cr.) -A LA N.) IV- : . CO N.) OO . . O O O O O O O) .P. CN N.) oO O) 4. w NJ 0 90 10 (St it � D—I 80 20 � (nrn rn n n 70 - 30 m 0 z v�i �> P1 Z -1 D —1 60 •• 0 40 C7 O N rn m 50 50 CA(n 70 - m CD o --< 40 60 CO Fri ` 0. O 30 - . 70 M o -1 20 80 ca co I :Z7 G7 Z D 10 90 _. --I E' O o � Z� o i I [ 11 i I , ri i t r f 11 I I I I I I i 1 I III I 100 Mr— N o 0 00 0 0 0 0 o°O Q) 4' w N — o • +' < + iv — o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 z D m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS �' 4' w N co co w o 0 SOD cD =O Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co z o > COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES 0 -< 19 0 cn z N Test Pit Depth Moisture CDKey Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL n I • TP-1 5.0 SM silty SAND with gravel 0) 0 TP-5 3.0 SM silty gravelly SAND SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ .. c N. 0 0 in in in in\\ \\\\ \ N O� CD IV 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O [0. 00N Cr) . CANJNJ- - CO NJ CO ,- -P. O O O CD O CO P. CA NJCO CO -P CA NJ0 V 90 10 gl A . 2D 80 �� 20 � (n M -0a m (-) 0 70 CD - 30 m m w C7 z -i c D 60 40 n o 0 cn z o > M F 50 50 U) m CO 40 60 CO -D m T o O 30 a 70 m o -H CD 20 80 CO CO I ICJ c) 1 m D 10 90 z o O z> � o II i i 1 1 t rill I I 11 Iiii I I I ffl , f 100 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°D Q -' NJ O0 a I' W ^3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b z D m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS N ° . o 0 N SOD Er; z O Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I ONE CD O > COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES G7 --1 21 O Z () Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL <7t3D I • TP-9 5.0 GM silty sandy GRAVEL 0 TP-10 5.0 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES [ NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM W Cn C.� N. O O O O O O \\ \\\\ \ N) O� O CD O O O O O O O O O CD 1 OO N C) . c N N.- .A CO N CO -P. O O CDO CDO( .A C.. N CO Q) A CA N O 90 �* 10 N ill \. 14 CD D--1 80 20�nl v � m o (n 77 m 7) n 0 X n 70 30 m n D z -I D --I 60 40 C7 rn 71 50 50 23 (f) m `_ ZJ 40 60 73 Fri A 0". G-) 30 70 m o —_-i V 20 �. 80 cc) Z D 10 0 • 90 az> C� 0 1 Tr II I 1 I r l 1 F I I I 1 I I ) 1 1 1 f I I -' 100 L I- IV CD O CD O O O O O O Cr, p. CAN �-"� N O O 0 0 O O O O O O O p O O O C° Cn -1, (A N O O O CD CD O z D� m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CT) -P. W N cn =0 z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE z Cl D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES c-) In un O z cf) Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL ):- I • TP-13 3.0 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt co 0 TP-15 6.0 SP—SW gravelly SAND SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM w� � w \\ \\\\ \ NJA O� CDO O O O O O O O O O O O rIP' 1 OON a, -A CA N.) NJ- - CO NJ r CO - . O O O O CD CD CT) - C....) NJCo CT, - ( NJ —• 40! 90 10 0 D 80 • 20 (/)DTI n o �7 P1 7J c) O X n 70 30 m o D cn z z c -H --Z- D 60 40 n a 0 cn z 0D 50 50 m w 4` 40 Ni 60 -< m o C) 30 70 m ilt o =-i �, G) +� ---i 20 80 cc) co I 70 rn D 10 z • 90 o Oz . Z o I I I I I I 1 f 11 11 1 1 I I JIJJII I i 7 I l I I 100 ? CN NJC+NJ O O O O CD CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I-T-J rT-JT) C NO — O O O COOo ) 4, ..) .0 p CD O p > GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS cD =O z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES Z o )" COBBLES cD 0 GRAVEL SAND O La Z cn Test Pit Depth Moisture Key USCS Description LL PL Number (ft.) Content (%) D ! • TP-16 2.0 GP—GM sandy GRAVEL with silt 0 TP-18 1.5 SM silty SAND with gravel ULM SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM w cn w - \\ \\\\ \ N A rn O 0 0 Q A_ O O O O O O O O i OON 0, ? (t.+ NJ N-P. 4.CO NJ CO ? ? O O O O O O O) -F. CA IVC) C) ? CA NJ O 90 , 10 0 lA D—I 80 20 ril _° m o Cn 70 m n O7.7 n 70 30 rn 0 Z o> m z —I 40 cD ,� 60 � 0n '� m D 50 - 050 73 ni CO 40 60 CO m 0"• CD 30 70 m = G7 o —I = ND 20 80 co oo I 20 G7 Z D 10 90 o O Z CD Z� � 0I 1 1 I I 1 1 i II 1 I I 1 1 j i Illii f I I I I I 100 CD; r j NJ 0 0 0 CO Cr, 0 0 NJ 0 0o a c N.) oo a i a v • Co o o • 4. W o o 0 0 0 0 0 D m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS co A w N co =O COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co z o D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES c) -< 71 O Lc Z Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL D ^, • TP-19 3.0 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt 0 0 TP-21 7.75 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM �\ \\\\ \ N . O) O O O O O O O O O O O O O / 1 DON O) 4, L N NJ-P. — 4,OO NJ W ? . O O CD CD O) ? CA NJ -- O] CT) 4, (,a N.) 0 el 90 10 c!l co / . 0 2 D I 80 N 20 (n rn (/)X m 7J c) 0 Xi n 70 30 m ^> PTl Z c D I 60 40 n z ? D I Tl Erl 50 50 c 0 m CU . 23 40 60 03 P1 o CD 30 - 0 70 m_ o -I-I G7 V 20 N 80 CO CO I 73 D 10 - z rTtISL 90 o 0 z c OZD,. � 0 1 i I 1 I I it I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 I I [ I I f 1 100 C r- N CD O CD CD OO CD CD CD CD -1,, CA N J O A C� N O O O O O OCD CD 0 O CD0 CDb CD CD O Z piGRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS N f CO � P. CANcp • U)O > cD =O z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co z o D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES co 0 19 O z cn Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL D 1 • TP-23 3.5 GP sandy GRAVEL 0 TP-23 11.5 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM - \\ \\\\ \ N -P O� O O O O O._.O_ O O O O O O O 1 OO N 01 -P. C..d NJ N- -P.CO NJCO - .A O O CDO O CDO) . W N DD Q) W NJ0 i% eel 90 10 cp o_ c� D-I 80 20 (/) I?1 v o �� c-) O X n 70 30 m ET-,C7D Ez _i 0 D 60 r • 40 n D H O ( z > Fri 50 0 50 m CO 40 w! 60 rrl 07. O 30 70 O o I C) J 20 80 (D co 1 7) O - z D 10 90 ---I E OKz c�D z� � O 1 Ir I I I_ , 1 i[ II I I 1 IIfI I I I I t ill I 100 C. (- N O O 0 0 O O O O O cc) ? W N C) O 4'' C N O O O O O O O O 0 b O p "1--f-I N.J O O O Du -A C� N C) p 0 0 O O D GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS SOD cD =O Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co z o > COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES cc) c) O us z cr) Key Test Pit Depth USCS Description Moisture LL PL Number (ft.) Content (%) a I • TP-25 0.5 ML sandy SILT ND 0 TP-26 1.25 SM silty SAND with gravel 1 -'1(147 DODDs ENGI2 CSC►TM oF ENr PL4N RENTQNN!NG MAY U') ig99 RECE/V VED UnCrOjf,9.9r., , MAPLEWOOD PARCEL RENTON for BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION STORM DRAINAGE STUDY AND PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS .•• 0f ";,col. v •▪, 4tr-.,,,t Project No.: 94168 1;,� F. ¢ Prepared by: James A. Olsen, P.E. `,, _;,. o••2 w (,\ Approved by: James A. Olsen, P.E. L.V 'e;•►s; ••U4, (� Date: April 29, 1999 ►ONAt- Planning•Engineering•Surveying 4205-148th Avenue NE Suite 200 Bellevue,Washington 98007 Tel.425-885-7877 Fax.425-885-7963 E Mail.office@DElonline.com 1 MAPLEWOOD PARCEL RENTON STORM DRAINAGE STUDY AND PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introduction II. Existing Site Drainage Conditions III. Developed Site Drainage Conditions IV. Routing Summary V. Appendix A. Storm Drainage Calculations VI. Soils Report MAPLEWOOD PARCEL RENTON STORM DRAINAGE STUDY AND PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS I. Introduction The Maplewood parcel is located on the south side of 128th Street SE between the Right of Ways for 148th and 152nd Avenue SE in unincorporated King County. The property is proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton in the Maplewood Annexation which has Boundary Review Board Approval. The property is approximately 62.7 acres sloping to the southwest at an average slope of 5%. The surrounding land uses are residential housing and undeveloped land. See Figure 1 for vicinity map. The proposed improvements include the construction of single family dwellings with related grading, utility, and road construction. II. Existing Site Drainage Conditions UPSTREAM DRAINAGE Upstream area that drains to the site includes approximately 50 acres which sheet flows across wooded terrain to the eastern property line (the 152nd Avenue SE Right of Way). This area is mostly undeveloped land or low density housing. See Figure 2 for Existing Drainage Basin Map. An area of 9 acres of pasture and low density housing lies directly to the north. This area sheet flows onto the property through the existing second growth vegetation. An upstream area of 17 acres on the north side of SE 128th Street is diverted from flowing onto the site through a series of culverts and ditches. The stormwater flows under SE 128th Street in a 30-inch concrete culvert to the northwest corner of the site. The roadway ditches that drain the roadway of SE 128th between 156th Avenue SE also drain to the northwest corner of the site. All of the stormwater from this area is directed to the west along the 128th Street roadside ditches. This roadside ditch is drained to the southwest into a separate drainage basin via drainage ditches and culverts. 128th is drained by a ditch near 146th Avenue SE An 18" culvert directs the flow under 132nd Street into a ditch which bends to the west to be drained under 144th Avenue SE by a 24" culvert. An area of 37 acres to the west is not tributary to site but does drain to the southwest property corner near the expected discharge point for the site. This area is primarily second growth forest with low density housing. ON-SITE DRAINAGE The majority of the site is currently young alder saplings. The site has a minor drainage swale traversing the site from the northeast to the southwest. The property is surrounded by unimproved Right of Way with the exception of the north property line. The Right of Ways currently are unimproved dirt roads. Small runnels have formed along the perimeter roads. Stormwater generally flows in a southwesterly direction over forested terrain. Where the flows reach the west perimeter dirt road, they generally run through puddles until a runnel directs them to a the drainage swale to the west. The flows from this drainage swale ultimately run back towards the southwest property corner. Where the flows reach the south perimeter road, they run through runnels to a section of cleared property which directs the flow toward a 30" culvert south of the site. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE The western swale and the on-site flows drain to a swale just south of the southwest property corner. The swale is broad with a shallow low-flow eroded channel. The channel seems to contain normal flows but is probably inundated during major storm events. However, there does not currently appear to be any erosion or capacity problems for the swale as a whole. This swale flows through a cleared and grassed area which does not appear to be maintained. The southern swale and other site runnels converge approximately 500 feet south of the property at a 30" culvert. This culvert directs the flows through the Plat of Briar Hills through a 30" CMP pipe at varying slopes of 0.6 to 3.8% (see Figure 3 for Downstream Drainage Map). There is one "off-line" detention pond approximately 1200 feet downstream which is thoroughly grassed and shows no sign of recent inundation. The 30" inch CMP ultimately drains to another"off-line" detention pond approximately 2200 feet downstream near the south end of Briar Hills. This detention pond shows evidence of recently detained flows filling up the bottom 2 feet of the pond (the pond has seven feet of available storage). This pond releases to a rip-rapped discharge at the top of a natural drainage ravine. The ravine eventually discharges to the Cedar River approximately one mile downstream of the subject property. The downstream flow path has no apparent signs of flooding or extensive erosion. III. Developed Site Drainage Conditions The site is 62.7 acres. Portions of the site will be kept in their existing state as preserved wetlands, buffers, and Native Growth Protection Easements. The 2.1 acre storm drainage facility will be a two cell water quality/detention pond. A 3.1 acre park will be centrally located. A total of 48 acres is proposed to be developed for single family dwellings. With 248 proposed lots, the site has a developed area density of 5.17 DU/ac. This would yield 48% impervious area and 52%pervious area. All site drainage would be collected in a roadway drainage system with roof drains connected directly to the system. Portions of these flow would be directed to the wetland for recharge purposes. Some of the existing offsite tributary areas would be captured into the roadway catchbasins and routed around the detention pond. The pond is designed to hold a live storage of 205,000 cubic feet. The pond will be designed to retain a volume of water as a pond amenity, and for water quality treatment. Tributary flows may be routed through the pond at a calibrated rate to ensure a constant water level and that stagnation does not occur. Discharge from the pond would enter the existing swale which flows adjacent to the southwest property corner. The 600 feet of swale which drains the pond and other off- site tributary area may need to be improved or"tightlined"to prevent erosion problems from being created. The storm events for the site as determined from the King County Stormwater Design Manual are: 2-year 24-hour: 2.0 inches; 10-year 24-hour: 2.95 inches; 100-year 24-hour: 3.95 inches. IV. Routing Summary The detention system will be sized to match the existing 2-year storm peak flows with the developed 2-year storm peak flows, the existing 10-year storm peak flows with the developed 10-year storm peak flows, and a 30% factor of safety applied to the calculated volume. EXISTING CONDITIONS COVER AREA CN Second Growth Forest 51 acres 81 Time of concentration 300'over forest at 7% 2200' shallow flow 3% 92.56 min. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS COVER AREA CN Impervious area 22.9 acres 98 Landscaping 25 acres 86 Park 3.1 86 Time of concentration 100' over lawn at 7% 300' curb flow at 3% 2800'pipe flow at 3% 21.41 min. DETENTION SUMMARY TABLE 2-YEAR 10-YEAR 100-YEAR EXISTING FLOW 2.18 CFS 5.64 CFS 10.03 CFS DETAINED FLOW 2.18 CFS 5.64 CFS 10.03 CFS DETENTION VOLUME 83,275 CF 118,072 CF 160,089 CF APPENDIX ,f Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Burnstead Construction Project Name Plat of Maplewood Address 1215 - 120th Ave. NE, #201 Location Phone 425-454-1900 Bellevue,WA 98004 Township 23N Project Engineer James A. Olsen, P.E. Range 5E Company Dodds Engineers, Inc. (DEI) Section 14 y Project Size 62 AC Address Phone475-RRr,-7R77 Upstream Drainage Basin Size 59 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS [X1 Subdivision Q DOF/G HPA Q Shoreline Management Short Subdivision Q COE 404 71 Rockery 71 Grading Q DOE Dam Safety 1 I Structural Vaults Commercial Q FEMA Floodplain = Other Other Q COE Wetlands Q HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN • Community Newcastle Comtunity Planning Area Drainage BasinCerlar River Basin PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Q River Q Floodplain Q Stream (Xi Wetlands I 1 Critical Stream Reach Q Seeps/Springs I I Depressions/Swales I X I High Groundwater Table Q Lake ( I Groundwater Recharge I I Steep Slopes Q Other Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Alderwocx1 5° Moderate ( 1 Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 • y 3•4L; • T 9£ /qv aas Lf3I r :.j I 4 I Mi T lL. ,`9;w el Ti Taa'N .. F�3� AV uln I • -M I I g4`1 ' �„,1 /// I N A nr HUE �I rMINIM•1 r/ _1 I i 11.1'� a I I ' fr.- y'/ "AT"d➢lil I A w IIE I]N �Y •rr. iI �" I _w • i I n iS AS IUHt a• <y �y5 + 1^�, 1. �< i �� it I ! 1 ■O e LL/. !/. .j 1 'a1 I Q_I -I �. I /, IS A N 1 £ I I Q� i•YiI I C z ~ '9� ' . $ cNz9 I W .; I s YJ7V1t11 S ..:;i 35 V .L091 L .1 I 35 AV PI I N1091 E • `— LI-I .L— `A 0 --DT -----T^ p a •It"I ii R f'i 1t AV NL61. 3N { i _r I I • N) f-) � I I V1 1 I M �i r »Av a 3s „ AV � 1 w941 u 9,Nn1 _ NUN C z I •\ V! ,jar i it.c,�,,j Nt11't•I\ ri d I 3slne NL►sl % W W ` t a 'Ai. , I a x I I i 7 ' I EE i i r � 'O x n wall �� I 1: y�9 3S AY is Y Evil a 3- N1NN1 2 2n NMI Al c{r w.� i S,u: ]S LwNIItIt _ HAYNly1 I I _• ' AV NUtI I I� x AY 111111 ;� 0" L L NUN; i -`/r I I 2�6 I I I '.E , "'flea &'5 L NMI= ,fit _ --I. ..v ... i`- I z 3S AV E 4H1tib1 if,AV IMIGII =� -' " 1 nNN AN GIIAI A S •I'YI / •'• - y •NLrI I W t be ^ I ••. �' I t 1 w7t wN ((1 1 !I:" nI35� �y xlnr ul NIA __ �, - 1� w iI -�� 4y ��Sc i��n�IlNiiiiii M _ I to /. 666Y •ir- ` •' N1s1 I id 1 G � r O -_- nV Nlile a•.t I'�,I —• - '--a61. ...qtN3NA a I i P -� 1 aG i I " V1 o ... i 3s1nv.NLCI I ' :rv/7 �.1 DIN I; 1 AV • vwor� I .�` NV f,f , i V I 1 I -0 "-m . - 1 C$tt'N ' ..4ii 15 � I .;:��{ I ay K ., IC1' Y ; ]c nr w' .a. te. _ I l,G F O I� •"E I I t„r t A r C 1 i z 1 w 5 " v 1• I i v = •WC�r�w�I 3 i� II a:� I dry 4. ^ `y' Q ux1IVLI !S i'8 .„IM nv A Laa r'4 -R i.l -w-�� -- I —.� , _,L._ ISIC ' :„ 'cr 01 — .AWN IA �]c nr .._ v .'st _ •� ( 1 EY�.��..>�tuanatima 1 ,. � =4 Syr ra" Y I ]II AY :MN�INYyN•�t ..Y aM co /y�; y •4• / EJ:LI! W..I �' AY . NOSY33 � _ , Y-33 y .• T 4•• ' I� �r ilitti 1 O , i i ~H p L to Ytillia '' k4.0 r NOL V i , 3S AV N1'1 ]s AY(i 11aC.,.l Ar' I,•� "r.�� -v ` i... I A _35 Y4 S I't�1!I oNM;li �Via �y �i:�7S1r �I 7T�� tl��@m,e�N.NY ——1� _ v __ Ilj " — 1.i+.• ]M u. .��.^Wz z — 1. _ 0it".: p 't�ir'.•NNNN�.7 "'�' .. —� ; iy 3g fir` '� - F NOlArO 1 �- .` ! :: I .. /— l _ A/L\ • i d • W 11 I Nrw•„.""":# �. ]NAA ..� 1 d JI�pQ' r I' IIIF;:,.;T, lidial L ]...MINI 3 __. FIGURE 1 ••• w, '"v 1 3M AY Ni30YitY ��ANNUNow N A Y •'.t re 14M lr r� .„- I AA', a A . • Zr I 3S NaNra• r t[Ntr oN Q l i , 4.II ,!:,...,--.1- " '- �� w u °"FF 'N W ' .� ~ �D '��y � VICINITY MAP ,,Srt.. '„! G...t•^^ 3N SAV i S3 . WiGM ►�—�_ c i•� •+ \\ .r,_.'_p+;i Aa :N AY ..IN �� - 1 N.. • - iis = MAPLEWOOD PARCEL. D' ' ruv G��N BL N �� NAN A-•' 1 .+�+npr-. kirfir �,�N\ . I Yaw-- / DEI#94168 tc,iI0?) —- e.I p. �'''i %M.� ,....• 1 = N I AY 34Y Iz 3 " , - February 14, 1995 Core and Special Requirements 1. Discharge at the Natural Occurring Location: This site generally slopes from northeast to southwest. Several wetlands bisect the site and convey offsite drainage through the site. Discharge of the sites drainage will occur at the southwest corner near an existing drainage ditch. 2. Offsite Analysis: See downstream analysis for upstream and offsite tributary drainage area. A large portion of the offsite area is tributary to the onsite swales and will circumvent the onsite detention system. 3. Runoff Control: The developed peak rate flow for the 2, and 10 year storm events are limited to the 2 and 10 year existing peak rates with a 30%factor of safety applied. 4. Conveyance System: The final design will incorporate the conveyance and backwater requirements. 5. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control: The requirements of this section will be addressed during the final design. 6. Maintenance and Operation: The requirements of this section will be addressed during the final design. 7. Bonds and Liability: The requirements of this section will be addressed during the final design. Special Requirements 1. Critical Drainage Area: The site does not lie within the critical drainage area. 2. Compliance With an Existing Master Drainage Plan: This site does not lie within a Master Drainage Plan. 3. Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan: The site does not meet the requirements requiring a Master Drainage Plan. 4. Adopted Basin or Community Plans: The parcel does not lie within an Adopted Drainage or Community Plan. 5. Special Water Quality Controls: The project proposes more than 1 acre of impervious are subject to vehicular use and is within 1 mile of a sensitive area therefore a wetpond will be required. 6. Coalescing Plat Oil/Water Separators: The proposed project does not meet the requirements of this section. An oil water separator will be installed (restrictor tee) in the restrictor catch basin. 7. Closed Depressions: The site slopes continuously from the northeast to the southwest. A closed depression does not appear to exist onsite. 8. Use of Lakes, Wetlands, Depressions, etc. for Detention: Not applicable. 9. Delineation of 100 Year Floodplain: The project does abut a wetland onsite. The floodplain calculation is included in the storm detention calculations. 10. Flood Protection Facilities: The site does not include a Type 1 or Type 2 Stream. 11. Geotechnical Analysis and Report: Not applicable. 12. Soils Analysis and Report: A copy of the Soils Report is included in the Storm Drainage Report. SHEET NO. 11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASI (RENTON QUADRANG ISSAQUAH 12 MI. 101 1 680000 FEET 1122°07'0"47- r/ '111 .1V•1 A:::-. i_ 1 rijil-._____, Is " -‘ . I II J.1 "="-' F• • • • ;' AmC :Ill'. u igh�an, ��trf r 1 i f . • •. o" 6 Sch c,ocie,,, 1 r•;;�I V; - — • ..AgC•ll .1 • :'• .1 `._JH '9 •• • 413• AgC �1�— .• •8td�°9i5 1:1• '/ •▪ AI D 0 , . • ' ( _ I • , � I — Trailgr . . . i: • :Ev6II. •-- iTs• � arkl. • . • j ti .BM ' 8M • ~ Greenwood ?ri C • 1 • • • I. 1 �/I �•• ,. 180 000 �1- '4i=====� •n ABC 1 ��E_ • :8 FEET fl °a •i .e 406 .. . / ° 11 An II , • avr,- 'PIT ��,11 p "% , U 1 O 'a, C �a 11 i % ) Q II 1 N • ,_ _ 1; • < I 'N •I ,c �.. • . ••, .•15'- 14 I;__': • • EvC I AkF I •••� • �,� ��'I I 1 • ADO' ' • — • PY r•.�' i / AkF / --' a •. II • • 1 BM n• , , ---!..,,: ..q , :�I • Rr.• • —1� AkF I�jjiE • ewo41l \ I °•• •..... $ %6o�j Se I \ o• - ,\� -• \\ AgC / �jlL,\�. •C°o�se 1 o EvB • I • ter. � � J� AkF _ J i" i • \ „oN ��V/ PY h AkF •7 f \` _` \ AgD V/� •• ` '�® 7 •�h`�.�,=AkF o --==a J, an,, •c\ 41 I' I�..�``• / A� �� • Ma la J n .`_/ "a t5'%/ 21 ,\ ram,'- \ /.asok � '\ 11�. � � ••, ,h � � �Q • • Elliot W • • I° I u =__ �• :II Py i� +` N, q dl '' vv AgC .AkF ofs filik----- �� c\\ cl f/� \\ �\�� 1 ABC 'I AkF \ Park _• P -4 —1 11 's, I y DD ___�I I / AgD ) ink AkF I\ l i n p -- BM � 7'3G„ _1 1_,1- 1�; D / �--, 1 . D,� ��. Ago_AgC AkF `\I 1 428 I ID PB i AgB .— — P/PE(/N£— V -J I 1 • ' 27 N e 12Ur . 492 i \D __ D 10/27/95 Dodds Engineers , Incorporated page 3 BURNSTEAD PARCEL DEI# 94168 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: EX002 NAME: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 51 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 92 . 56 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 .00 s : 0 .0700 TcReach - Shallow L: 2200 . 00 ks : 4 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE: 2 . 18 cfs VOL: 2 . 57 Ac-ft TIME: 550 min BASIN ID: EX010 NAME: EXISTING CONDITIONS 10 ' . SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 95 inches AREA. . : 51 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 92 . 56 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0700 TcReach - Shallow L: 2200 . 00 ks : 4 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE: 5 . 64 cfs VOL: 5 . 42 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min BASIN ID: EX100 NAME: EXISITING CONDITIONS 100 `(1Z , SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 51 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 92 . 56 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0700 TcReach - Shallow L: 2200 . 00 ks : 4 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE: 10 .03 cfs VOL: 8 . 84 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min 4/27/99 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 Maplewood Plat Prepared April 27, 1999 Prepared by J.Olsen BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D0002 NAME : DEV COND 2YR EVENT SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 28 . 10 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 21 . 41 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 22 . 90 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE : 11 . 39 cfs VOL: 5 . 37 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D0010 NAME: DEV COND 10YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 95 inches AREA. . : 28 . 10 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 21 . 41 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 22 . 90 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE : 19 . 65 cfs VOL: 8 . 98 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: D0100 NAME : DEV COND 100YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 51 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 28 . 10 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 21 .41 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 22 . 90 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 28 . 77 cfs VOL: 12 . 95 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 4/27/99 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 Maplewood Plat Prepared April 27, 1999 Prepared by J.Olsen STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 40 Description: POND 30% SMALLER r HAN PLAT DWG 1 STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE---->' STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- i 394.00 0.0000 0.0000 395.60 53922 1.2379. 397.20 113107 2.5966 398.80 177884 4.0837 1 394.10 3370 0.0774 395.70 57293 1.3153. 397.30 116915 2.6840 398.90 182173 4.1821 394.20 6740 0.1547 395.80 60663 1.3926, 397.40 120724 2.7714 399.00 186461 4.2806 394.30 10110 0.2321 395.90 64033 1.47001 397.50 124533 2.8589 399.10 190750 4.3790 394.40 13481 0.3095 396.00 67403 1.5474; 397.60 128341 2.9463 399.20 195038 4.4775 394.50 16851 0.3868 396.10 71212 1.63481 397.70 132150 3.0337 399.30 199327 4.5759 394.60 20221 0.4642 396.20 75020 1.7222! 397.80 135959 3.1212 399.40 203615 4.6744 394.70 23591 0.5416 396.30 78829 1.80971 397.90 139767 3.2086 399.50 207904 4.7728 394.80 26961 0.6189 396.40 82638 1.8971' 398.00 143576 3.2961 399.60 212192 4.8713 394.90 30331 0.6963 396.50 86446 1.98451 398.10 147865 3.3945 399.70 216481 4.9697 395.00 33702 0.7737 396.60 90255 2.0726 398.20 152153 3.4930 399.80 220769 5.0682 395.10 37072 0.8510 396.70 94064 2.1594 398.30 156442 3.5914 399.90 225058 5.1666 395.20 40442 0.9284 396.80 97872 2.246E 398.40 160730 3.6899 400.00 229346 5.2651 395.30 43812 1.0058 396.90 101681 2.3343 398.50 165019 3.7883 395.40 47182 1.0832 397.00 105490 2.4217 398.60 169307 3.8868 395.50 50552 1.1605 397.10 109298 2.5091 398.70 173596 3.9852 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STC- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE < DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) .__ 1/2EX 2YR/DEV 2YR 2.18 11.39 40 51 396.44 15 84199.19 EX. 10YR/DEV 10YR 5.64 19.65 40 51 397.35 16 118801 DISCHARG STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 51 Description: ORIFICE FOR POND Outlet Elev: 392 . 00 Elev: 390 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 6 . 1758 in. Elev: 396 . 50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 11 . 3906 in. 4/27/99 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 Maplewood Plat Prepared April 27, 1999 Prepared by J.Olsen LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 1/2EX 2YR/DEV 2YR 2.18 11.39 50 51 396.04 15 89506.73 EX. 10YR/DEV 10YR 5.64 19.65 50 51 397.02 16 138318 EX. 100YR/DEV 100YR 10.03 28.77 50 51 398.21 17 198528 S I 6 Vo r-.►O S ker 3 o. I, ty,F. ¶)Ft,\Co--) v1 , LV 4/27/99 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 2 Maplewood Plat Prepared April 27, 1999 Prepared by J.Olsen STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 50 CQONS) W 1' 30 I- 'r 5 P 1-.1 Description: POND STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 394.00 0.0000 0.0000 396.80 127235 2.9209 399.60 275850 6.3326 402.40 348876 8.0091 394.10 4381 0.1006 396.90 132186 3.0346 399.70 281425 6.4606 402.50 350990 8.0576 394.20 8763 0.2012 397.00 137138 3.1482 399.80 287000 6.5886 402.60 353104 8.1061 394.30 13144 0.3017 397.10 142089 3.2619 399.90 292575 6.7166 402.70 355217 8.1547 394.40 17525 0.4023 397.20 147040 3.3756 400.00 298150 6.8446 402.80 357331 8.2032 394.50 21906 0.5029 397.30 151991 3.4892 400.10 300264 6.8931 402.90 359444 8.2517 394.60 26288 0.6035 397.40 156943 3.6029 400.20 302377 6.9416 403.00 361558 8.3002 394.70 30669 0.7041 397.50 161894 3.7166 400.30 304491 6.9901 403.10 363672 8.3488 394.80 35050 0.8046 397.60 166845 3.8302 400.40 306604 7.0387 403.20 365785 8.3973 394.90 39431 0.9052 397.70 171796 3.9439 400.50 308718 7.0872 403.30 367899 8.4458 395.00 43813 1.0058 397.80 176748 4.0576 400.60 310832 7.1357 403.40 370012 8.4943 395.10 48194 1.1064 397.90 181699 4.1712 400.70 312945 7.1842 403.50 372126 8.5428 395.20 52575 1.2070 398.00 186650 4.2849 400.80 315059 7.2328 403.60 374240 8.5914 395.30 56956 1.3075 398.10 192225 4.4129 400.90 317172 7.2813 403.70 376353 8.6399 395.40 61338 1.4081 398.20 197800 4.5409 401.00 319286 7.3298 403.80 378467 8.6884 395.50 65719 1.5087 398.30 203375 4.6688 401.10 321400 7.3783 403.90 380580 8.7369 395.60 70100 1.6093 398.40 208950 4.7968 401.20 323513 7.4268 404.00 382694 8.7854 395.70 74481 1.7099 398.50 214525 4.9248 401.30 325627 7.4754 404.10 384808 8.8340 395.80 78863 1.8104 398.60 220100 5.0528 401.40 327740 7.5239 404.20 386921 8.8825 395.90 83244 1.9110 398.70 225675 5.1808 401.50 329854 7.5724 404.30 389035 8.9310 396.00 87625 2.0116 398.80 231250 5.3088 401.60 331968 7.6209 404.40 391148 8.9795 396.10 92576 2.1253 398.90 236825 5.4368 401.70 334081 7.6694 404.50 393262 9.0281 396.20 97528 2.2389 399.00 242400 5.5647 401.80 336195 7.7180 404.60 395376 9.0766 396.30 102479 2.3526 399.10 247975 5.6927 401.90 338308 7.7665 404.70 397489 9.1251 396.40 107430 2.4663 399.20 253550 5.8207 402.00 340422 7.8150 404.80 399603 9.1736 396.50 112381 2.5799 399.30 259125 5.9487 402.10 342536 7.8635 404.90 401716 9.2221 396.60 117333 2.6936 399.40 264700 6.0767 402.20 344649 7.9121 405.00 403830 9.2707 396.70 122284 2.8072 399.50 270275 6.2047 402.30 346763 7.9606 Planning-Engineering•Surveying JOB NO. DODDS ENGINEERS INC. 4205-148thAvenue NE Suite 200 Bellevue,Washington 98007 DATE Tel.425-885-7877 Fax.425-885-7963 E Mail.Once@DElonline.com BY "-)1E*1-r3ot-4D s( i 1\3621 LZU ^, 7CN-3S -&U1! P .E JT'S f •Ur 4ecc-- A A > I tkweLva)U AYZGA -T-R1E `/ 10 v c�1- = . 2 W Pc1 U 'U-1`/ v N 1,/,J 0(n. ,ti fe.evfouS - Z, Ac ( 43,E 60). —_ 4 - Zzi- t.a 0 t J 91S.2 5 , F E.--(.... = 394:, =Y 44_ .1450 5F > &)"ls' ►2 .I vo L 6f- P n t:2 ��1 AteA C5, ) =ona 94 41 (4-5 a (?12-0\I 0E0) f\Alc.T .S7(40 0 (,. ) Z- ItsIzco6 I ►2,2`° 4..3 c ( Fv.AJ:1v�':t! ) • � t2. -G1' . I . 1 j. i SHEET OF ,' / ) (.1 \ i (1 1 3 L11 , Li a . 0 _ __, -- -a f ,:.,...,"";".;.",miiiiimigkii;:::.::•... i —- - 'Tc,(7111 ,,,..< 1 c 1 0 ,- r D k 17.33 AC , �- ,Ilr :� I � t NOT TRIBUTARY S. E. 128TH BAR ! tnt.A AAi T6„Om 01 �Cl...� �_w \ n :. I � I utltl A touTltl laa _ , • Ilitaa u•a laT NYUTAi �• I ASSE SOR lel.a.am.a_=_. ` a r-aLa \ �,,, • a ---- Er en sr e•a-JI«..•a w�.. --.- ...a ,. .... r.n .._ » ... _.. _. ..�_ �....�r .........a.. YL ie.Tx. P5..�.�.�" :.. --'- .......=:�` i.0• 12 rNµ- .. i '� or.-.e. IR 11 7 !• :ii.........iii'a 1.��k1 �1 ✓•�Y 7r ` j V. % / 4.1-_,r7•�i1�i�ii111l1111 ♦N.•-J N1...N.N••1111 I NHN:1•H!••....�i1...••ai1e1.11/111.1111•/l� a I a✓ ♦..I.tH♦/♦ ♦•..1.1�•N✓ 1• •1.•NNNI.1•.1 = - .. - _ / / ,/ , ^f� 1 •: `� :k 1 •�tk.•.,��1,•1•.1•••eN.•":•a•i1!•1111/111111^ii / / � i 111 •.•11 1. /"�/ r* .T ns ,,r J �• r �+:- I 1.1•••.a.•i.4•Oii i 1.•i.•i•••.••'10i.ib••••.•i.•i.•i••S1 \ 1 r ; Q © r® . 0 / -•..•.•.1P.,•.1•, •,1•.•11•,1N. 1 .....1••1 ! I 1•o f 1••••�• I11.I • NN.•//1 ..M....N1i el://. ai _ I1, 1•.,e Ii•it* 1•...1.•••.••1/11.111.1.11.1e.1.1 . `i-IpI �•.• 1/ri1.1/1��1♦�,11..1.11.1/1/111.11.11 / a,I L..r.,.. 11�-�r ..: _ .C. �• , •��1!: :ifi ��1� �!._1��1•��:::!•.•.::•:::�) � � - • ! .'1'1'•�'ffl lo1"••'1'1'ii•'vY••'.'11'rrYflii'1'i:1.•�1'.'•1 \ - - /F fit11 •1•••.11r• 1.•111.•1••1.1•r1.••.•11•..1.1.11 / rr 9 ..-' ar•" - I I- 1.4%.*:"N1.11•..••..11. .•..•..1.1.•••. , �� ♦••111./•4•11•..1.1••...11.•1.1.•...•11.11111•I `'� ® ® ® 4, ® � - H•1.1•NI••1.1••1H♦N•N1♦1•.•11,•••••.•.••I �__��`\ '" '� •' �----T-:.—!->:-r.-rzt- DITCH � •.o•os/-1�;•,:;:..•....•.••..•./a,....a......•.•.. _ � �- ,,... L �� oo{ I{ 1" ..11.1.Y11r•.•.1.1••1.11.•.♦♦11•♦•••1.1..•.1♦ /0/1 ///��1�at® u� 1 i ` .•.••:+: 1....1..•.1.1•,.1.,,.•••...•.... .,1 � �t/L''" ��1'I' �© � r ✓ � .1.1.•1•l.rr•••..1.•/♦.••1•,1••...1.••.••1,1•.. G a a =4. � ». I ® '©I VI ...- ..•eJ.••.•r�1.•,..11••.•1./I�i.1,,,•,.,,,•,1/1.1,111.,1/1!•1•, i �.. �Ir�r••r•°i�i'i.r•..'.'•.'1'ri'o-•�rr'iii.'1'1i=c.`.'1'i1'i'•°I ` �� ':::::: - . `I 1•TI r+' 1 _ 1•. 1.1111.1•.•I ♦••�• •1r•�!.•11/1•.11••,• I�j�/��.................., ,.,/1a1.. 37.5 AC - 50 AC ' j D�w; . •.•O.SIIS.• .,....1 •r• N1•>•/Ir• •NNHNr `?3 uta I`—_ _ i. <...v. '..:::.1,:l.1./1.1.��.1„..�..A..„1r1.....,.„,t�..�....e,f,::! ` .--`rr . ' -�1'il - ® I Lr• A 70 y t ! 9 : :, , •— Qt ._. ♦Nv11• •! 1 •1 ai ♦°'•e•N••Y•rr•Y>`L•"f� •�_��1.��:�..::1.1 ::•:.::QG��I.IAAtA.N.•�•��j• ,,tom • v aE,, -,:•. ; . -• % .i;..tl.....:1:;k%•;I iii°i:f/•;4 liiiii°eTi_�'- . J 'ow!e �►r //L/pir,,....,... / - - _, ��_� - .4•ii•�1,1,��I�•••••.c::1 ...• 1.a.1.{:�J4�{,vv ate!• %' ,' t. 0, r %� 1 a - ♦.•111•• H1.1••.•.1•.NC,1.1•N••11.1•••1 `�V'�;� r , v ? �! a F .d T !•••>!•1�•�•1••.•11.111...,+•111.,1•••1.•.•• LI-r.--- .... i+ `i . _f _ t OPT a • ,•, •>•11.•1•..•..❖,•,..•.•.•.•.❖./,...••••••..••. .• . /� �ra �•a: o •1:14.:4:::••,•,.e! ::;'Ni❖•••❖ :•:•❖ , SITE �� , d/lI� /i 1 e`r _� —___'u''_.�: ap•�•��•�a°.•i/1i>•.•OI.00•••.'.•1❖O1t,'IiOO.O•O•iO•••.'..•1 A'a� r - _ � ♦IItIM• N•N•N/♦rr11N♦•.•.•.♦..N tyyr 4,4 �� • 1•�.•Y�N•N111N N.M111.•••.1 N,.NH•N••1 , � •••lflr•1•C••1111••1.•1.•1•v••111.1.1•.10••• rl �_ „•„t •f ,I a '11•.11>11.1�.••.1,11/11.1.11.1.•1,•••..1••1•Io1 • /1_f•.�1•1..••1...•a11•a'�..) •.•1.3.1••It•,C:••1!1, .� ...I< �l .I.zi tar. 1 •..•1.1,.1.1•./::::; .1•.,•1•0�•••....•.•.... I'--,� Yal{ I� tla.ano-tyaOaoaa• ,1•••111.!•1>•••.•11•,•11.•,1.1......1.111.1.4 / / 40 11111••r/1.1.•..•1.111•,.11.11.•.1/11.•1••1•.t .' 1Q• `l • I Ila • •1••.k 1.1•,1�i•1.••.•..•1•1..•...•1•1••.•1••••.•1•1•�.•1••�•!.•f• I 1 „�+ {3 1s ` _ 1�1�r•••.{�1'f�I•.•.•.•...�....•...•••.1.•.•.t.11.1...•A-1...1.•...•.•.. 1 �111•�•11•//•J�•.'1••.,.,•.1111.•11..1.1••.•1•• g-1. 111•.•.1 tlrll1,1.1.11•••11••11,•.1•.•11..11.1?Y"a L.N.<H•1 S.11NNMNNN•••.• 1NN••.1./ w •+ yr 91wi 1.1.•1=C 11p•1.1/111.•1•♦.••••1••••••1•••.•1• I �� • II Gr. ••11•.•.•.1••1.•1.1.11•.•.•1.1.1• a ( •0•i'•�1•..•A0..1..••1101.••••1�1�1�••P••••a••.••S.?•'i��' I t? • 1 Ie` • ,� 1�••111�,''i�.••11.•...� .1..1.••1.111•♦..',.1•♦ 3'•/ r-� •°00••i•+iibi!i•••iiii0•0•.i•0..0•d0i••0Jd0i•0'P••••.S fa7/�� ,�. ,y: f. :Z t,!•••11/.cNNN .1` ♦H•.H••N•NN.IN•i I • 1 «—�`r �••1.•1• .1.•1••1...11••1..,.•11.11.•111•♦ /•I.rl•�1.1.1•••••••.,.1.1.111..11.11•.1. i ? ,. 4 1 , i••iiilt��i•1•iii••.•ii/i.•i'••.�..••••.•i.••.•i•••••••ii 2 ••K ••A•asu•uuuuua•• •• .0 I • ,1.,1.1.•••••1.1...1.1•.1•y.•u111•...•♦ • • (.:- • TJ * .,.I•k.••...•.N• NIN •NHN.••.N,+' ; 31 , ' r..a n ••./t1•••>❖1•••1•••1❖iii❖.•i••••.•i•••i•1.•i❖i•1••••••❖ii. ' ..moo — �•11.i ai•••1•i❖i•1❖ii.•i•••i•./•-.•••••ii�iiii•••i❖••i•.: I r ar `)11••F•• •❖i1❖i❖iii•••i••❖i•••••••t �•jjjjj•,•j•,: aC3;gaoaW eao`n'an .. t .�� k• 1• . •N1•NNNNN•• , 1.•.• .. ,,. , 1I J.i /rSE ras tI ST r = .... . J© •�• ••I© ± ...✓.r®... '�•� - 3✓D ,� —.a1 ii Ti. 'Sa rY+. (L...(.J», a""::. sE qe rh aT -_ t •• _ '� / J •,TE uarN TT ••�� .. I -_ - j au u•u.l ._ ^ -�'�— �i.`. .."•- $W Ia- '3 ua•S.r.... ry,.. .. . .. •- .. T..._.« r FIGURE 2 WESTERN SWALE EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN MAP RUNNELS ,pLEWOOD PARCEL DEI#94168 February 14, 1995 1 1 WESTERN SWALE > RUNNELS .c "'41:1/- -''.....__ 4. tL____ it--........... iii___ .-- 44---" , ,.... I CV 30 CMP II_fltJ : JJ : *ft — 1 g �., POi 1 r_— tI no1 _i ii .. .. v ,w�'T.' I• y jid, 1 I 1 L ' N 1 �� / `'d II ( . 1, ' 1 Ili h •,_ , , ii . ',•.�e ,. , 1 I• 1 r r 4 P6re i LPG . : F,: _„ r b _ » r r "r --=- wr, PG e• ram ..,6... ..� n • •/., ' I• '.• II • 'e, ; u, , 'I ,li _.-..:.- ♦ .it0,SEr NOTN PL jj _+u— -'—�. • S. ... •b i;02.'1 • I 'r .". It r/i`" 2, L CI 1 DETENTION r.I p' •I ;,�� p - ] __::s _. ,. s• •r y • 3R1 ,• , i1� i•! .p 1 • dN u.MJ..,I Sr` •• ' .3 . r r/+, h -P ■ SC rYTrR r17 ,E'f, � 7U .;4 . POND ��=e b... . H •t. r •- f ,. a .a 1I:f r•J. �_m�N. • ..c I.rno sr 1"'. ,1 'C".41"*" :' 1.". _ ,� 1 K NtAO I- ; M. , MT RAVINE 4, '4 ' 1 ilk '. ' E 1L�5'I1>1f J. '1 L ` , m°,°`r rt `� El �' Sr 1I 40i; t ' rtc r.•••2 'r^ i • _ _.67.; - ,. ._,._ .....- ,0 wzr.di MY 23-23-5 FIGURE 3 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE MAP MAPLEWOOD PARCEL DEI#94168 DITCH FLOW ANALYSIS :.... . . .. . DITCH DATA: BOTTOM WIDTH (FT) = 10.00 JOB NAME: Maplewood LEFT SIDE SLOPE (L:1) 3.00 JOB #: 94168 RIGHT SIDE SLOPE (R:1 3.00 OPERATOR: JAO BOTTOM SLOPE (FT/FT 0.0200 DATE: 4/27/99 MANNING'S n = 0.350 FLOW FLOW WETTED HYDRAULIC DITCH FLOW DEPTH AREA PERIMETER RADIUS CAPACITY VELOCITY (FEET) (SQ FT) (FEET) (FEET) (CFS) (FPS) I 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.05 0.5075 10.3162 0.0492 0.041 0.081 0.10 1.0300 10.6325 0.0969 0.130 0.127 0.15 1.5675 10.9487 0.1432 0.258 0.164 0.20 2.1200 11.2649 0.1882 0.418 0.197 0.25 2.6875 11.5811 0.2321 0.609 0.227 0.30 3.2700 11.8974 0.2749 0.830 0.254 0.35 3.8675 12.2136 0.3167 1.079 0.279 0.40 4.4800 12.5298 0.3575 1.355 0.302 0.45 5.1075 12.8460 0.3976 1.658 0.325 0.50 5.7500 13.1623 0.4369 1.988 0.346 0.55 6.4075 13.4785 0.4754 2.343 0.366 (-- ,1-__-_ - • 1...,,--, ' tit7 (' ,e-t ••• ct---• 2,17 .. •-.. I 1 i • ' \ ir - ^• ,• --irr'7". I k ' \ ..- - ' 'V)1 ' C ' ' ' ..-' r."' c..- ...._..., • f 4- • l , si \o- it...,1-e./:--eriol,-.1 5L.LiALE No Sit\ La. , 4/27/99 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. PAGE 1 . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . .... . .... .... .. . . . . . . . .... .. DITCH FLOW ANALYSIS DITCH DATA: BOTTOM WIDTH (FT) = 3.00 JOB NAME: MAPLEWOOD LEFT SIDE SLOPE (L:1) 4.00 JOB #: 94168 RIGHT SIDE SLOPE (R:1 4.00 OPERATOR: JAO BOTTOM SLOPE (FT/FT 0.0500 DATE: 4/27/99 :MANNING'S n = 0.035 FLOW FLOW WETTED HYDRAULIC DITCH FLOW 1 DEPTH AREA PERIMETER RADIUS CAPACITY VELOCITY (FEET) (SQ FT) (FEET) (FEET) (CFS) (FPS) 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.05 0.1600 3.4123 0.0469 0.198 1.234 0.10 0.3400 3.8246 0.0889 0.643 1.891 0.15 0.5400 4.2369 0.1275 1.298 2.404 0.20 0.7600 4.6492 0.1635 2.157 2.838 0.25 1.0000 5.0616 0.1976 3.220 3.220 0.30 1.2600 5.4739 0.2302 4.493 3.566 0.35 1.5400 5.8862 0.2616 5.981 3.884 APev 014 1 t,' lie, �l-6)Do PL.,. I -,koct.-L-V LA-7 orN1 : =-E 1:...-- se,! l L-F« w aTL A SJ 9 i L Ems.S 0► .1. S I'T'L_ . 'ice-` G ,2P L wE'R..P,Nit) 60t•Ivt-iS EL-0 4-) 620t-t c 1T sr r 'nil uJG ra ►\- y-./.,zc.�x_ . o ►-A RtECf 2s. P 0 tZ s v,-,LA tv,i TO rte.. S'(_,-i L i1"4'a" \O p •/Q- (e/k t- i2/›',L uJ A : L S1 F' C `.'7 1D�1 IJ . 11-► pn i"A\ r-‘ Li: (LS S` )G� Dr-) Tl 14VD\,-c.%C7 ,� ,-I)t-1 SLWI•AP�_`/ lNo-kco, (oLLcle..i5 . Rv,,,(.,0)(1LI,,,- CI 5 C°" r rLDL\JS -(-i-N-vUC, I- 1-)-t-E--_ C y►-P 1-.)1.--1 Aer 4' u-> I ►J r> t' 1-1-tz_ L �`U T OF -1- - C-Loo\..>1 :.k:,J N-1 c N O C-i,J .5Hvw ow -r1ke✓ pl./> I,-1 Are) Cr`i T1-4-1 S T1 Lr , 4/27/99 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. PAGE 1 4/27/99 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 Maplewood Plat Prepared April 27, 1999 Prepared by J.Olsen BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: FL100 NAME: FLOOD PLAIN FOR 100YR EVENT SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 25 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 25 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 92 . 56 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE : 4 . 92 cfs VOL: 4 . 33 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min i 1 10,45,4iiNVINSIMPOWAVAigilliareft‘giatrilliiMMOWOrgaillitWOMOROBriplql!. i 1 ill gteg -•- eg ...., „. ,.., :mg , 161 0 *IA ag le lVo, , me ..,;:p mg ?Am <.•.;!...,,.,...;,.,. Km 1 to ,, i GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ..4 ,,*: *A • 0. .. e..... .i eg Maplewood .::._ SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE 4::•b]:-• Pil Renton , Washington ..c ,....".„ , OR WA ':Ws' I '''$:;.Q, I • • maJ R:f gi Project No. T-2798-1 N•".$''',i i :go i.*40 ....e.g A1 Op ag A Et1:: , .....- ..... ......... ....... ••••••••• 4,,,,,,., .•0,..:,:.• ....•,...,.s..- imisimisommemisimmigamiminimmAinsimummiiii.mmini;igi:$i0::::'',i.,m; ... ...•.•:Vi;:::ii,....).::4. ? . r,',:etrn: - •:...`:4:' . ., •.=.., -:,... .:-.,..,..,:,..,, \, ,k.... ,,,,. Terra Associates, Inc. F.• • • . - -' ....,„4:0::.\\...:,-..,,,,w, , •.,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,„ k.,40% .. . \\NONMA: A A A 4 ommmpowelowAgswommigm:MOONNONWVMMONOINMOMMOMmgmwo:':. .% '.4.44.4.,..13 6,,,,,,, --- - AMORNMOSakitn*R0000MEMMOMOOMAWN*PigagWaMONMEMSONRgNO - A , .....,„to 40 • ..... . ..,....,.. . .. . ...... ..... ......L „.,_. ..... Prepared for: -9 ........ ,...,:.: , ........ ...„. .1,:. . ii,..,.., ......„,, Burnstead Construction Company :.., , :•:•-_,-„,, .0... .:, Bellevue, Washington gi . ,m0 ftg AP iN C IgA I ia * . W .,,,,41W1 4: , 0 .,,, . Olt:1 • .gft. •Ni February 3, 1999 .A:K: ,...:.• gtit •'...!•4 4'.:i....:, '''...•,.. .,. A ,... * . ht ! ilii efl i .. ..._...._ .......lii .................._._............„....................„.„................,..............................................._____.........___.................. msogosompfmassor-:-Nowom revvoit i-04,:- . ' agmemm.„.mmommogm, TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. k. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 Mr.Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company 1215 - 120th Avenue NE, Suite 201 Bellevue,Washington 98005 Subject: Geotechnical Report Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Hughes: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our field exploration indicates the site is generally underlain by glacially-derived silty sand and sandy silt soils. In our opinion, these soil conditions will be suitable for support of the residential subdivision as proposed, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into project design and construction. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. Mary Stiehler Project Geologist c IL 1 a.- 4 qg • Anil Butail,P.E. President 1 006 711 MS/AB:ts • AH. MRE? 1.2/9/q q ` 1 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work 1 3.0 Site Conditions 2 3.1 Surface 2 3.2 Geology 2 3.3 Soils 2 3.4 Groundwater 3 4.0 Geologic Hazards 3 4.1 Erosion 3 4.2 Seismic 3 5.0 Discussion and Recommendations 4 5.1 General 4 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading 4 5.3 Excavations 6 5.4 Foundations 6 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction 6 5.6 Lower-Level and Retaining Walls 7 5.7 Drainage 7 5.8 Utilities 8 5.9 Pavements 8 6.0 Additional Services 8 7.0 Limitations 9 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Figure 3 Typical Footing Drain Detail Figure 4 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (i) Geotechnical Report Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will consist of the development of an approximately 61-acre parcel located at SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE in Renton. The project location is shown on the Vicinity Map,Figure 1. We understand that the proposed development will consist of the construction of a residential subdivision consisting of 144 lots. Specific design and site grading details were not available at the time of our study. However, we expect the buildings will be single-family residences of one to two stories, with wood-frame construction imposing relatively light foundation loads. We expect structural loads will be about 20 to 40 kips for isolated columns and 1 to 2 kips per foot for continuous bearing walls. Main floors will be constructed at grade or framed over a crawl space. Given the gentle slopes at the site, we expect the grading required to establish desired building elevations will be moderate. The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made, we should review them in order to modify our recommendations as required. We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design and construction. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK On November 24 and 25, 1998, we excavated 17 test pits to depths of approximately 6.0 to 11.5 feet below existing surface grades. On January 20, 1999, we excavated an additional 10 test pits to depths of approximately 6.5 to 12.0 feet below existing surface grades. Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically,this report addresses the following: • Soil and groundwater conditions • Suitability of native soils for use as fill • Site preparation and grading • Foundation support • Earth pressure parameters for basement or retaining wall design February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 • Slab-on-grade support • Drainage • Excavations • Utilities • Pavements 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface • The subject property is bounded by SE 128th Street to the north, SE 136th Street to the south, 148th Avenue SE to the west, and 152nd Avenue SE to the east. Most of the surrounding property is undeveloped, although there are existing residential subdivisions east and west of the property on SE 132nd Street and SE 136th Street. The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by a coniferous/broadleaf forest. Wetland conditions are present at several locations in the southern three-fourths of the property. An intermittent stream with associated wetlands crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. A smaller intermittent stream is located slightly north of the first stream and has the same northeast/southwest orientation. Topographic elevations on the site range from approximately Elev. 500 at the northeast corner of the property to approximately Elev. 395 feet MSL at the southwest corner. Current site conditions are shown on Figure 2. 3.2 Geology The Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux (1965) shows the soils at the site mapped as Quaternary Ground moraine deposits (Qgt). The unit is described as mostly thin, ablation till over lodgment till, deposited by the Puget glacial lobe. The lodgment till is generally a compact, coherent, unsorted mixture of sand, silt, clay, and gravel that is commonly termed hardpan. Ablation till is similar, but much less compact and coherent. They are highly variable in thickness and in relative proportion of lodgment to ablation till; lodgment till is generally 5 to 30 feet thick,ablation till 2 to 10 feet thick. 3.3 Soils Excavation of the test pits at the site generally revealed an approximately 6- to 12-inch thick layer of topsoil overlying glacially-derived silty sand and sandy silt soils. The majority of the site consisted of very weathered glacial till underlying the topsoil to depths ranging from 6.0 inches to 4.5 feet below existing surface grades. The very weathered till generally consisted of orange to reddish-brown, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some roots. This material was loose to medium dense and damp to wet. Page No. 2 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 A less weathered till material was encountered below this to depths ranging from three to eight feet below existing surface grades. This weathered till consisted of mottled gray and brown to gray, silty sand with gravel and cobbles. It was generally medium dense and damp to wet. An orange and gray, moist to wet, firm to stiff, fine sandy silt with clay and some gravel and cobbles was encountered in Test Pits TP-3, TP-11, and TP-16, ranging from three to eight feet below the ground surface. Dark brown, wet, medium dense, gravelly sand was encountered from two to eight feet below the ground surface in Test Pit TP-15. A layer of orange-brown, wet, loose to medium dense, sandy gravel was encountered from three to five feet in Test Pit TP-23. Unweathered till was encountered at the site at depths ranging from three to eight feet below the ground surface to the maximum depths explored. The till was generally dark gray to gray, damp to wet, medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some cementation. More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the Test Pit Logs in Appendix A. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. 3.4 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in most of the excavations at depths ranging from 0.5 to 8.0 feet below existing surface grades. The seepage levels observed are indicated on the attached Test Pit Logs, Figures A-2 through A- 15. In general, groundwater will develop as a perched condition above the glacial till. It should be noted that the test pits were not allowed to remain open for an extended period of time, which would allow for a more detailed evaluation of the groundwater observed. Also, fluctuations in groundwater seepage levels should be expected on a seasonal and annual basis. Typically, groundwater seepage reaches maximum levels during and shortly following the wet winter months. 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Erosion The soils encountered on-site are classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (zero to six percent slopes)by the Soil Conservation Service(SCS). These soils are nearly level and undulating; the erosion hazard is slight. 4.2 Seismic The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology from Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, a soil profile type of Sc should be used. Page No. 3 February 3, 1999 Project No. T-2798-1 Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically-recent deposits of clean fine- grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular friction, thus eliminating the soil's strength. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions we encountered, it is our opinion that there is minimal or no risk for liquefaction to occur at this site during an earthquake. 5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General Based on our study, in our opinion, soil conditions at the site are suitable for the planned development. Residences can be supported'on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils below the upper organic surficial soils. Alternatively, if required by desired final building elevations, structural fill placed and compacted above these native soils can be used to support building foundations. Floor slabs and pavements can be similarly supported. The native soils encountered at the site contain a significant amount of fines and will be difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. The ability to use native soil from site excavations as structural fill will depend on its moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner should be prepared to import free-draining granular material for use as structural fill and backfill. Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design considerations are provided in the following sections. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious materials should be stripped and removed from the site. In general, surface stripping depths of about 6 to 12 inches should be expected to remove organic topsoil. Stripped vegetation debris should be removed from the site. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill but may be used for limited depths in non-structural areas or for landscaping purposes. Page No.4 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 Once clearing and stripping operations are complete, cuts and fills can be made to establish finish grades. Prior to placing fill and to prepare building and pavement subgrades, all exposed surfaces should be proofrolled to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. If excessively yielding areas are observed that cannot be stabilized in place by compaction, they should be cut to firm bearing and filled to grade with structural fill. If the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive, you could consider using a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, in conjunction with structural fill. A minimum of 18 inches of clean, granular structural fill over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. A representative of Terra Associates should observe all proofrolling operations. We also recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify stable subgrades. Our study indicates that the native soils contain a significant percentage of fines (silt size particles). These soils will be difficult to compact as structural fill if they are too wet or too dry. Accordingly, the ability to use native soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions when site grading activities take place. If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months, or if they are initiated during the summer and extend into fall and winter, the owner should be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose, we recommend utilizing a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements: U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing 3 inches 100 No.4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4-inch fraction Prior to use,Terra Associates, Inc. should examine and test all materials proposed for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this ASTM standard. In non-structural areas or for backfill in utility trenches below a depth of 4 feet,the degree of compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. Page No. 5 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 5.3 Excavations All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches, must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements. Based on current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, site soils would be classified as Type B soils. Accordingly, side slopes on excavations greater than 4 feet but less than 20 feet in depth should be laid back at a gradient of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). Alternatively, utility trench sidewalls can be supported by a properly designed and installed shoring trench box. The above information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants and should not be construed to imply that Terra Associates assumes responsibility for job site safety. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. 5.4 Foundations Spread Footings Residences may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils or on structural fills placed above competent native soils. Foundation subgrades should be prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. Foundations can be dimensioned for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot(psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable bearing capacity can be used. With the above bearing pressure and the anticipated structural loads, we estimate total and differential settlements of about one inch, and one-half inch,respectively. For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.3 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the sides of the footings and buried portions of the foundation stem walls can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation, as it can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value includes a safety factor of 1.5 and assumes the foundations will be constructed neat against competent native soil or backfilled with structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction Slabs-on-grade may be supported on the subgrade prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Immediately below the floor slabs, we recommend placing a four-inch thick capillary break layer of clean, free-draining sand or gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slab. Page No. 6 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, an eight- to ten-mil thick plastic membrane should be placed on the capillary break layer. The membrane should be covered with two inches of clean, moist sand to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. 5.6 Lower-Level and Retaining Walls The magnitude of earth pressure development on lower-level or retaining walls will partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, the backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, wall drainage must also be installed. A typical recommended wall drainage detail is shown on Figure 3. With properly placed and compacted wall backfill and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf. For restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be added. These values assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no other surcharge loading, such as traffic, sloping embankments, or adjacent buildings will act on the wall. If such conditions exist, then the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section of this report. 5.7 Drainage Surface Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend providing a minimum drainage gradient of three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the residences, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. Subsurface We recommend installing perimeter foundation drains adjacent to all structures that have their main floor framed over a crawl space or constructed at grade at an elevation equal to or below the final exterior grade. If the floors are constructed at grade and elevated above the adjacent outside grade, the owner may elect to eliminate the foundation drains, provided positive drainage is established away from the structure perimeter. A typical recommended drain detail is shown on Figure 4. Subsurface drains must be laid with a gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to a controlled point of approved discharge. Page No. 7 February 3, 1999 Project No.T-2798-1 5.8 Utilities Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association (APWA) or City of Renton specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. As noted, soils excavated on-site should be suitable for use as backfill material in dry weather, provided the moisture content can be controlled to facilitate proper compaction. If utility construction will take place during the winter, it will be necessary to utilize suitable wet weather fill for utility trench backfilling. 5.9 Pavements Pavement subgrades should be prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Regardless of the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and relatively unyielding before paving. The subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The pavement section is dependent on the supporting capability of the subgrade soils and the traffic conditions to which it will be subjected. For traffic consisting mainly of light passenger and commercial vehicles with only occasional heavy traffic, and with a stable subgrade prepared as recommended, we recommend the following pavement sections: • Two inches of asphalt concrete(AC)over six inches of crushed rock base (CRB) • Two inches of AC over four inches of asphalt treated base(ATB) The paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) specifications for Class B asphalt concrete,ATB,and CRB surfacing. Long-term pavement performance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly-drained pavement section will be subject to premature failure as a result of surface water infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their supporting capability. To improve pavement performance, we recommend surface drainage gradients of at least two percent. Some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement surface should be expected over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to seal cracks when they occur. 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc., should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the project design. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Page No. 8 February 3, 1999 Project No. T-2798-1 7.0 LIMITATIONS This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc., and was prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is intended for specific application to the Maplewood project and for the exclusive use of Burnstead Construction Company and their authorized representatives. No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made. The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from the test pits excavated on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc., should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. Page No. 9 u,E Nt :41. va T.�—.,4 t; �. sE {.. �s 1.� sl E ., \a . .„( I 0L x1 tIr, T`zsa VALUY RF4, \ f'- •n � ST c"t I.M 51 u S 1 < -:� .A f 1'?MK(b r 5400 O v Q �' -[g ST .erg. F'T-0N .sSS p9 g sr him Pi '' \< '1 *000 '4 IsST" ySIE `• 112T4-;}SST u iu.. - Y SE 112TH ST S, ls` I: "E t[ITN 00v N p N '5' `S•4 \. - SE 112TH Si I rN Intl r'sr '=I INZ N t u F_ SE l lJT1E r .�' ' it „ .� r_'. ICI W r _ < 5r -` 42' Lh SE n' i �,c. i 1 E. 3 m FS t rP �c: n ,-'Y "E M 3 Ll< I i r y SE 1IITH ST sE I.r,t _ lN•v V IOTN LM � a a ."PO ` ,ER; yT� �:+sl,.i `m"�` oo SE t'116TH ri > NE LOTH A sr • h 9 N2/l 1 Ki — .. 5.114M n 1 14ac0 S.n <I< 902 - ,,,, �'i ' n. I SE 117TH ST ,,,I 'a 0 sIN H. 91_I 4.„ ♦'Kp z -I SE ll8r, i5rrl il,,t �I i - 12 M1 �4 RI, g - yr Sr - ~ - ` < NE B7H ST 1 $ 1r^ li Nf 7TN "[ ME ITN Pi SE 120TH ST -'I \- ALA, STD ST3 NE 3 Z.�Sf 121ST ST \�, 7TH ST NE i[Tr. I SE_'if" ,_. O "_' 7T1 ST Y #4j0"n .-jE 122ND • P- CWLFfELO $T \r LA L n '. _• Yt PARR l 54./'. �M '''''1' u PL [I► W '..t ` .v"E'rwr�rp ill:<'' 1H^'-� „ry �I1 ST SI ', '1 _SE 1124TH ST SE 124TH 1ST I :.Cat ., n -i t' SE 125TH Sr I( `is/Y(�:, _ iI1 lif<'3, B N' < ME 5TH Sr' t H .4 I ''' '1 <I Nf:: k Ez.�, _SE 124TH K <ST N[ sM . Y t< SE Inn. ,W < i, h •L^ ✓Wi= N -� 4 sr � <1 11 Y `` < 12 Z ;< _ # <' • PARK i I 4TH , 1 $T.-�jI SE 128TH ST - SE ~t � 128TH s "` RIDE �� I�" . 4100 �g :yJ.0,30 1'.'7'ry-�� T SNE JRD R t ,-.il SE 129T� lis FSL ,"n1 ,., =1l'is -,T� <i ,., < E IIiST S7<' n�v,"i 210 A I y --f- SE �',1ts_. ES2ND <i ST SE I32ND ST I' �.t., , I z1 k • <u SE Bap SE 172N0 ST i I SE 132N0¢" 1srIP �( r�, 15 �4ro1 sr _ �I 17.7"P ET I• I PL . STY . !CgcC a SE '' sE 's'� lI ' �: SE 1NTN-• sil- <I<' NY, .. 17-5� A 5-04.l 0 14 _,I < s[ ! g E -1SE 1 ST4 i ,��Sr},��I1� Sr sr I'- I 1 SE MO [['Pt I I SE-1 136TH I sr _ ___ 36TN sr ^I7 , of SE 1J6TH -L1-. I I S Q I sF Lkr.,S I/100 p,N [-, a`R, I NI p0 Irn. I I 1?k0 <'.. ........ .....,-1__, ,E '0 ' '` '; q-i� y�Y [FY S �; ts,, j 13 ' SE X u dd �" • 4jST ; SITE -I n l�f�rf� 7 ,� LlBER7 S' ^M� / <k <''-5�14�rS �P.`r SE 139TH ' I < _I b st,..,von.VI 4I Y Pl. Ei 5 - SE 140TH ST - lST- • n i ., HI.� ,:; u A1 - SE 1415i �g wo, _ q ,,,R u Q�SE lu sr N aro15 t L_ , a`s� `sp` SI SE 144TH W F It -'I ST '' /, �,,,?; 1,,,,,..:. =, •SE 145 . ! sE E� St 1 15900 s., E, t ' s -^I�GI.� 169 DOLE 1 i� .'"1". 1 �r \\ •. 1 6, 9-4,,,,,„t N z 4 REIIT N'It' 'L I E`fM 9 `I ,1 ` 'a _ ISN:AAD_ ya n ,I;, I ��d�'I :cue ,a g st' CpRSE h 3. • . x r nu �I�1, 4 P F. kat 1I I" K • • � ,. 3 e " 1_i N!D r _ .s3ixi/ `$hS Q ••SF 1;r`_�1 � Sf1.11"sT .� "; ,.ryd /s.s4 E PL J SE x,8,�,� , �i certy' E1aJ, o,, ' r e x :J1 c v 4�.. •..7---- .---:,---R22 t RIYER r. ,�� i> k 8 s 9 [.9s^ s r!_ .i',�� x r'J, 0p R ,i y,PA 1 n 1'�'rES ��/ C• ��7� 23x RD 24 5T !9 VqU ^�l•Q-!, ;,-",F!-�. •"sE 1sz, i' ,11 NQAv 5 Ss r �tti y a RD ' "� ` 7.- cEn".7 LJ k ," ,k .�rsM 7 tH a'a " 6T `�s P .L CrWR RfvER ar", u R =1 g,-,�,csw. J� �Y', ' ,,; c N:17 `-i RENTON uEsvE"-.t=,1 FAI RW00 ,6, . ',ST SE 160.X`X.f rE lsVtM' 159M • A./ + v 4— .,...SS 161ST n„,,SE 1601"P�H ` SI�� 5 ,.. yr. r. ,ii- . .se 6 `1 �' n e,i,,, tv rt1> a' `�625r• E P' b 4 �i'.i.6 s`. :! f1,D ,,Di •B 1 REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 626, 627, 656 AND 657, 1999 EDITION. VICINITY MAP TERRA MAPLEWOOD � �Q�� ASSOCIATESRENTON, WASHINGTON �' Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 1 I — /' — • , j I_ , 4/A / / —, ') 1 TP-9 - i ' 67 i, j / %/ (7-00, 7 + 4 7 I• rl ,/ 140., / - ./ Ns I f 4j VIj 'r 'A -- . fig 1 74 t ra 42Fi / , TN I-- - rz v_ n-% �; sbi _ a _ sizi _ n P-SI TP-18 L. , ' 01 oyes wI1 = f.A� 0 ' *ri ' v,,lv.) I / 614: iff + / al, • F,TP6 4;:#'' a FO ' x � / jai /,� t of 67 TJgA^�i}-c� j es' rt?7rf7 ;' e1 ' I j / t° A.— e7, tL ILGD N .›. •fi i ts j yea. eb i--/ i '� 1 sac ,TP-7 j---- j,. I j r j TP-5 TP-25 �...� \ i i SCALE LEGEND: 200 400 feet 19 APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN MAPLEWOOD RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 2 12" MINIMUM WIDE f 3/4" WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN _i__. ________________*._ T- ks.„;.:.:-.i . .... . . ... ..-_ .:...... ..... .. . • ..." ... ..-- . ,,. - ... .. . = 12 40 EXCAVATED SLOPE _' (SEE REPORT FOR \V.:4 • APPROPRIATE � ... INCLINATIONS) ke::;:$ ' . . . . 2:. - ..1 . ..• . . ••••„ ' I COMPACTED STRUCTURAL a•it. •• :. . BACKFILL \'". \\�\\\\\\\\\\\\S!: ` ..\ \ 12" OVER THE PIPE 3" BELOW THE 4 DIAMETER PVC PIPE PERFORATED PIPE NOT TO SCALE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 1,00213; TERRA MAPLEWOOD r\\��Q�\� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-1 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 3 BUILDING SLAB da a a 4 , c • 1 a /. //, //,<//\//, .' COMPACTED '. 'STRUCTUR•AL \ • BACKFILL: \� ,.� ./ k \ 4" PERFORATED PIPE 3/4" WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL wean TERRA MAPLEWOOD \ ASSOCIATES RENTON,1 WASHINGTON tadiersis Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 2798-11 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Maplewood SE 132nd Street and 148th Avenue SE Renton,Washington On November 24,November 25, 1998, and January 20, 1999, we performed our field exploration using a rubber- tired backhoe. We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating 17 test pits to depths of approximately 6 to 12 feet below existing surface grades. The test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The test pit locations were approximately determined by measurements from existing property lines and surveyed stake points on-site. The Test Pit Logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-15. A geologist from our office conducted the field exploration and classified the soil conditions encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)described on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the Test Pit Logs. Grain size analyses were performed on fourteen of the samples, the results of which are shown on Figures A-16 through A-22. Project No. T-2798-1 MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL Clean GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no GRAVELS Gravels fines. Q, (less than GP Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or O ca N More than 5% fines) no fines. Tz'c7) 50fr of coarse Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fraction is GM fines. a al m m larger than No. Gravels .— 4 sieve with fines z c N GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. CC 0 0 Clean 0 of N Sands SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. o SANDS Wa Z (less than Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no s c More than 5% fines) S P fines. Oa)s 50% of coarse o fraction is SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. U 2 smaller than Sands No. 4 sieve with fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. CO Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight •`C—a o SILTS AND CLAYS ML plasticity. a)CD N CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). E o 0 Liquid limit is less than 50% — LLI o z•( OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Z c�na0 — - Q c 4' a) MH Inorganic silts, elastic. Cr co • 0 a) �' SILTS AND CLAYS caal EL2 CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Z ° cc % cc Liquid limit is greater than 50 r- 2 OH Organic clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS Lu Standard Penetration 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT Q Density Resistance in Blows/Foot I SPOON SAMPLER cc 0 Very loose 0-4 — 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER o Loose 4-10 — OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER Medium dense 10-30 z Dense 30-50 Y WATER LEVEL (DATE) < Very dense >50 Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Standard Penetration Pp PENETROMETER READING, tsf gConsistency Resistance in Blows/Foot DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot U Very soft 0-2 LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent `o Soft 2-4 Medium stiff 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX J_ 6 Stiff stiff 1 -132 N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot VerHard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM .�� l TERRA MAPLEWOOD aius ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-1 Test Pit No. TP-1 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 . TOPSOIL;dark brown, sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) _ Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,damp, organics. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Brown and gray mottled,silty fine to coarse SAND with subrounded gravel - and cobbles,somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) 15.8 _ Gray silty fine to medium SAND,with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(SM) 10— 11.2 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at7feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-2 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content nt 0 . TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) - Orange-brown,siltyfine SAND,trace medium to coarsesanddandgraver 32.4 and cobbles,organics,loose,damp._Very weathered till)(SMI - Grayand brown mottled,silty fine to coarse SAND with subrounded gravel 12.3 - and cobbles,somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _- Gray siltyfine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 10— 7.7 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD IIIII�`""` ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-2 Test Pit No. TP-3 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content 0 TOPSOIL;Dark brown,sandy SlLTwith organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel,and 55.5 - cobbles,organics,loose to medium dense,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) 46 - Bright orange and gray fine sandy SILT with clay,stiff,wet. (ML) LL= 5— 31.6 PL=31 31 PI = 15 - Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(SM) 10 — 11.3 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at 3.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-4 Logged by: MS • Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium sand with coarse sand,gravel and -\ cobbles,organics,loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Gray and brown mottled,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles, - somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 15.8 5- - Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand and rounded gravel and cobbles,dense,wet. (Till)(ML) 10— 11.5 - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at 4 feet. 15 - TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD bausOiso ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcol Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-3 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Con t nt ) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 29.5 cobbles,organics,loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,some 13.9 - clasts of somewhat cemented fine sandy SILT,medium dense,damp. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _ Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand and gravel and cobbles, _ dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 11.7 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-6 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(% nt ) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sander SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 38.2 cobbles1organics,loose,damp. (Veryweathered till)(SM) Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. 13.5 5— (Weathered till)(SM) _ Gray silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel,and cobbles, _ dense,moist. (Till)(SM) _ 12.4 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at 7.5 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS 111011110e11114 TERRA MAPLEWOOD t �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-4 Test Pit No. TP-7 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) 22.1 Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, - loose,damp. (Very weathered til)(SM) ray and brown,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel andcobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) Gray,sk fine to coarse SANDwith gravel and cobbles,dense,moist. 5— (Till)(SM) 12.0 Test pit terminated at 5.75 feet. No groundwater encountered. 10- 15 Test Pit No. TP-8 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(t Content 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, - loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) y _ Gray and orange,silty fine to coarse SAND with some clasts somewhat 11 5 cemented,with gravel and cobbles,loose to medium dense,moist. — 5 (Weathered till)(SM) - Gray,silty fine to coarse SAND-Wth gravel andcobbles,dense,moi§f.TriI1 SNIF- 12.9 _ Test pit terminated at 7.75 feet. Groundwater encountered at 3feet. 10- 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-5 Test Pit No. TP-9 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 \ TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddishbrown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 23.1 - loose,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) _ Gray and brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 10.9 5- - Gray,silty,fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles,dense,damp. - (Till)(SM) 15.9 1 0— - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-10 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Cont ) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Dark reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND,with gravel and cobbles, - organics,looseLmoist. (Very weathered till)(SM) 40.5 Gray and brown,silty fine to medium SAND,with coarse sand,gravel and 1 - cobbles,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose to medium dense,moist. 5— (Weathered till)(SM) 14.1 Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles,dense,damp to moist. (Till)(SM) 10.8 Test pit terminated at 8.25 feet. 10— Groundwater encountered at3.5feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-6 Test Pit No. TP-11 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(ono) 0 , TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,roots, 18.4 - loose to medium dense,damp. (Very weathered till)(SM) - 7.8 5— Gray and orange,fine sandy SILT with clay,gravel and cobbles,firm to stiff, - moist. (ML) LL=30.5 _V25.3PL=24 _- Gray and brown,silty fine SAND with clay,gravel and cobbles,medium dense PI = 7 to dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 10- 21.0 - Test pit terminated at 11.25 feet. - Groundwater encountered at8feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-12 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/24/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 _, TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel,cobbles,organics, 31.1 - loose,moist. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Gray and brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,loose to - medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 5— 10.6 Gray,siltyfine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,medium dense to 8 5 - dense,moist. (Till)(SM) 10— Test pit terminated at8.75feet. No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS '�`` � TERRA MAPLEWOOD r �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-7 Test Pit No. TP-13 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content 0 _, TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel,cobbles,organics, loose moist. IVeryweatheredtill)(SM1 - Gray and brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,loose to medium dense, 12.5 - wet. (Weathered till)(SM) 5— Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles,dense, - moist to wet. (Till)(SM) 10.2 10— Test pit terminated at 8.75 feet. Groundwater encountered at 1.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-14 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(%)nt 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown sandy SILT with or anics moist. - -Dark reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles, organics,some clasts somewhat cemented,loose,damp to moist. 21.9 (Very weathered till)ISM) Gray and brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles,loose to medium dense,damp. (Weathered till)(SM) 6.9 5— Becomes more cemented and dense at 8 feet. (Till) 13.4 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD riajpassis ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-8 Test Pit No. TP-15 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) - Reddish-brown siltyfineto coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 34.8 -, loose,moi$t. (Ve�rw�s,thQl��tilp(SM1 - Dark brown,gravelly SAND,trace silt,medium dense,wet. (Weathered till) - (SW) 5_ 8.5 Gray,silty fine to medium SAND with gravel,and cobbles,coarse sand, 11.0 - dense,moist to wet. (Till)(SM) 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - Groundwate seepage at 2 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-16 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 TOPSOIL;_dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML)_ Reddish-brown,gravelly silty SAND with cobbles,loose to medium dense, 11.2 - damp to moist,roots. (Very weathered till)(SM) Gray with orange mottling,fine sandy SILT with clay,coarse sand,gravel and LL= 18 5 cobbles,stiff to very stiff,moist. (ML) 14.2 PL= 14 PI = 4 Gray silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and cobbles, - dense. (Till)(SM) 7.7 10-- - Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ``�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD 11111111 i* i ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-9 Test Pit No. TP-17 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 11/25/98 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(ono) 0 TOPSOIL;dark brown,sandy SILT with organics,moist. (ML) Reddish-brown,silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and cobbles,organics, 30.6 - loose,damp to moist. (Very weathered till)(SM) - Gray and brown,silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 12.6 5— cobbles,loose to medium dense,damp to moist. (Weathered till)(SM) _ Becomes cemented and dense at 8 feet. (Till) 10— 14.6 Test pit terminated at 10.25 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 Test Pit No. TP-18 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Contentn (/o)0 Topsoil- Dark brown, moist, sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 40.9 - Reddish-brown,moist,silty SAND with gravef and cobbles,loose. 29.2 V (Very weathered till) (SM) - Gray, moist, silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium 11.6 _ dense. (Weathered till) (SM) Becomes cemented and dense at 4 feet. (Till) 5- 10.3 - Test pit terminated at 7 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 1.75 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD kotepassis ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-10 Test Pit No. TP-19 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content (%) 0 Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 64.4 --Ffeddisfi-brown,moist to wel,silty SAFT6witfi gravel and"cobbTes,loose. 31.8 Y _.__(Very_we at b erect l it t j4S M) Gray, damp to moist, silty SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to - medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM 11.3 - Some cementation at 3.5 feet. 5— Becomes dense at 5 feet. (Till) 11.4 Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 1.25 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-20 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content nt 0 Topsoil-blackish-brown, moist, sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 33.1 Reddish-brown, moist to wet,silty,fine to medium SAND with coarse 28.1 1 sand, gravel and cobbles,loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) Gray, moist, silty fine to medium SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 13.1 cobbles, loose to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5 Some cementation, medium dense. 9.7 Test pit terminated at 6.75 feet. 10— Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD \ e llim°1111111114 ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-11 Test Pit No. TP-21 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description C(%)nt 0 _ Topsoil-Dark brown, moist,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 30.3 _ Reddish-brown, moist to wet, silty fine SAND with medium to coarse sand, gravel and cobbles, loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) 30.9 - Gray,moist, silty fine SAND,with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium 13.5 5— dense. (Weathered till) (SM) Some cementation at 7 feet, medium dense to dense. (Till) 14.6 10— Test pit terminated at 8 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2.5 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-22 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 Topsoil- blackish-brown, moistLsandy SILT with organics. (ML) 28.2 Reddish-brown, moist to wet,silty fine SAND with medium to coarse sand, gravel and cobbles, loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) 22.1 17.0 - Gray, moist, silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium 5— dense. (Weathered till) (SM) - Some cementation at 8 feet,medium dense to dense. (Till) 10.2 10— Test pit terminated at 9.25 feet. - Groundwater seepage at 2.5 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS ,�`�,,�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-12 Test Pit No. TP-23 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content(o/o) 0 _ Topsoil-Dark brown, moist, very silty SAND with organics. (SM-ML) 26.6 - Reddish-brown, moist to wet,silty,fine to medium SAND with coarse 25.6 sand,.gravel and cobbles,loose. (Very weathered till) (SM) Orange-brown,wet fine to coarse sandy GRAVEL with trace silt, loose 11.4 5 to medium dense. (GP) - Dark gray, moist to wet,silty SAND with gravel and cobbles, medium 13.2 _ dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 10—• Gray,moist,silty fine SAND with gravel,cobbles, medium dense. (SM) - Medium dense. 13.1 - Test pit terminated at 11.75 feet. _ Groundwater seepage encountered at 3 feet. 15 Test Pit No. TP-24 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 Topsoil-Dark brown, moist, sandy SILT with organics. fML) 33.0 Reddish-brown, moist,silty fine SAND with medium to coarse sand, 31.1 ___gravetand_cnbbles,_rants-_.><Very_weathpreriiill) M).__(S y Orange and gray(mottled), moist, silty fine SAND with gravel 22.5 and cobbles, loose. (SM) Gray, moist, silty fine SAND,at 4 feet some cementation and medium 11.5 5—' dense. (Weathered till) (SM) - Less cemented at 6 feet. Medium dense. 14.4 10— Test pit terminated at 8 feet. _ Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnlcal Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-13 Test Pit No. TP-25 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft ) Soil Description Content(oho) 0 Topsoil- Blackish-brown, moist to wet, sandy SILT with organics. (MUOL) 69.2 18.5 Dark gray, silty, fine to medium SAND with coarse sand, gravel and - cobbles, moist, loose to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5— Becomes more cemented and dense at 6 feet. (Till) 14.3 10— Test pit terminated at 8.75 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 0.5 feet. 15- Test Pit No. TP-26 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content 0 Topsoil-Dark brown, moist to wet,sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 58.2 Reddish-brown,wet,silty fine SAND with coarse sand,gravel and 46.6 - cobbles.Joosa__(_Very_weathered_tdt)__(S1'A) _ Gray, moist to wet, silty fine SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 14.5 5— - Becomes a little more cemented, medium dense. 1 0— Medium dense 14.9 - Test pit terminated at 11 feet. - Groundwater seepage encountered at 1 foot. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA MAPLEWOOD 600 ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-14 Test Pit No. TP-27 Logged by: MS Approximate Elev. Date: 1/20/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description Content Topsoil- Dark brown, moist, sandy SILT with organics. (ML) 43.3 — Reddish-brown,moist to wet,silty SAND with gravel and cobbles,loose. 21.6 (Very weathered till) (SM) _ Gray, moist, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles, loose 15.3 _ to medium dense. (Weathered till) (SM) 5— Less medium sand and gravel. Medium dense. 12.7 10— Test pit terminated at 8 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS \`,�`�� TERRA MAPLEWOOD �� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-2798-1 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-15 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM N. O O O O O O \\ \\\\ . N -A 0) O CD O O O O CD CD O O CDEar1 OON O, CA IV N? 4>CO NJ CO . - O O O O O CD 0, .P r . NJ00 0, CA NJ1 _ o i so _. . 10 0 D—I 80 20 _. (n IT1 m c) 0 X n 70 _ 30 Frl m Z o, �� Z - - —I D —I 60 w Q 40 n v > Z 50 50 V) CD -< 40 - 60 Cn m 0 = 30 70 Fri o --I GE N) 20 80 up m > 10 90 Z _ , 0 oKz 0 Z� cil O I I U 1 I 1 ' I I1 11 1 11 I 11 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 I 100 O 00 00 O O O O O O O . W N O -Z'' �"� N OCO p O O O O O O 0 0 O p �z D m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS J ° m o „o D cD =o Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE c z o D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES 0 0 un z up Test Pit Depth Moisture Key CT) Number (ft. USCS Description Content (%) LL PL • I • TP-1 5.0 SM silty SAND with grovel 0 TP-5 3.0 SM silty gravelly SAND SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM (+�(J) c++ N. O O O O O O \\ \\\\ \ N - On O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O - L. N N - CO N CD ? O O O O O O . (1 N) Oo O) - W N O �:s 100 %' ''•. 90 10 (fi ': 0 \"`I. ' 2 D' "1 80 20 = cornm 0C 70 — - 30 m o rn _ Z D —I 60 40 n ni M 50 i 50 U) Fri co20 --< 40 060 W a. O 30 a 70 M oC) 20 80 (D co I 2J O . ,.-- Z > 10 ( 90 o 0 Z OZ> 0 i ii I I ? i1,1 II I l i ! illl I II I I 100 L (� O O O O O O O O O CON -' O �"J N -- O O O O O O CD O CD O O D M '�' GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS N CO C .P. CA N cD =O z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE cc' Z o > COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES 19 0 N La Z N Moisture Test Pit De th Key Number (f{) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL D I • TP-9 5.0 GM silty sandy GRAVEL 0 TP-10 5.0 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ c.+cn - w �� \ \ NJ A O O CDO O 0 O O 0 CD O O CD1 OON 01 A W IV • - : SOD no CD ? .A O CD CD O CD 0) . c,, NJ0o CD4. W N O or 90 y . 10 PI 40 s D—I 8o 20 71 V)Z7 _ n 0 73 n 70 _ 3o rni� o m Z co n D z I —I D --I60 40 C7 o _ O N Z > im 50 50 cr) CD < 40I 60 CO rT1 *441\ o 030 ,\ 70 m o =-i G7 v NJ 20 80 CD 00 1 G7 _ Z D 10 0 • 90 Z>. � 0 I 1r 11 i r I 1.i1iI 1 1 I !iiii I m [ i II 100 i—}-'i O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O m N —' co '- CA N 6 6 0 0 O -o O 0 0 0 O > `�' GRAIN SIZE iN MILLIMETERS .. m N No a ..(.0 =O Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE Z IC) >. COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES G7 --i () O z (7) Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description LL PL Content (%) a I • TP-13 3.0 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt c . 0 TP-15 6.0 SP—SW gravelly SAND SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ c.,cn c. / \\ \\\\ \ N A O• O CD 0 O O O O O O O O CD O / 1 OON N N A ?CO N CO - O O O O CD O OO (A N CO CO 4. C. N I 0 ii % 90 10 c� 0 D-I 80 M - 20 g. (n M o (1)7) m70 c� n 70 SO m 0 rn z N nD z -, c D -I 60 40 n 0 „� a M m 50 •` y 50 40 60 CO -< v M a. C) 30 70 m o --1 0 -'-I NJ V 20 80 CO FriD 10 �. Z , 90 o O z Z'CD 0 I 1 1 1 1 I I [ II I I I I I 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 _100 cn C.nl IV -+ co CD .? W N CD CO CO ? C.d N O O O O O O r- N o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 - � m �-+ N - o 0 0 0 0 nrm 6 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS w N °° CA N (-11Oa cD =a z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co Z p ➢ COBBLES FINES co 0 GRAVEL SAND --I C - O Z ") Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL a • TP-16 2.0 GP—GM sandy GRAVEL with silt 0 TP-18 1.5 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM \\ \\\\ \ N o, O 0 0 O O O O CDCDO O O O 1 OON CT, - (.+ N...) N- . CO : CO -P. . O O O O CD CO . CA N.) Oo CT) . C.I P..) 0 :11 ' i - , 90 10 L-)11i _ o o 2 D—I 80 i k " . 20 (n M _ -0 n m o (/)X m O X n 70 30 m 0 m z 0, n D z -H ff.- 60 - 40 n -TiO Z 0D 50 50 V) CO ' 40 60 OD m = 30 70 L o —I . . G7 20 80 (D CO I 27 m D 10 z 90 D o MZ - - ZD O I I C I I I I I fi I I I I I I I Ill I I I I I I IIII 100 L IJ CO Co cz)? CSICD' CO CO ? C.+ IJ _. co A (.4 N O O O O O z o 0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS W N �0 Cr)0 0 CD o cD =O = COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co =o >" COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES 0 -r< 19 O un z u) Test Pit Depth Moisture c Key Number (ft.) USCS Description LL PL Content (%) > I • TP-19 3.0 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt 0 0 TP-21 7.75 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES J NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM • t+(n (.+ N. O O O O O O \\ \\\\ \ N Cr) O O O O O O O O O O O CDr. O 1 OON 0 -P. (J N N-P O ?CO N 03 A A O O CD O O al -P. C.i N 00 Cr) ? CAN �O 90 - 10 .\\11\ . - PIA D--1 80 20 fm g. �XJ --0 O�7 70 - 30 C) N n D z z c D --I 60 40 n o - -17 a 0 M FT1 50 i 50 70 rT-I CO 40 60 CO -v o G7 30 t` 70 IT1 o -=-I -I NJ 20 v. 80 (D CO rn 10 90 .__, Z D o zD Z 0, I P I i I II C I II I I I Ili 100 C.4 NJ N O O O O O 0 0 O O J� C� N — Co T LA N — O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 O b D m0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS N ° CD g o N 0 co =O = COARSE J FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co z o D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES c) C) -� O Z ci) Test Pit Depth USCS Description Moisture ure LL PL CD Number (ft.) Content (%) I • TP-23 3.5 GP sandy GRAVEL 0 TP-23 11.5 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM \\ \\\\ \ N..) O, O CDO O O O O O O O O O O IVA (N IV IV A A CO N CO A A O CD O CD CD a, A (..a N CO CT, A (.,a N �; 100 Iti 0 c_ ,. _ s D 80 20 o (/)�7 rn 1I - c-, 0 XI n 70 _ 30 m m C7> z - - -H c.— 60 ' `% �. 40 n N _1 z 1 0 (rn Fri 50 050 m cozi 40 60 CO v m • o G) 30 Z = 70 Fri O —; . G7 20 80 (D I O m D 10 , . Z 90 ---I o OKZ . a, z› o r I , i r i I 1 1 r l l l [ 1 I I I [ I I I l I I I I I 100 G., N 00 m A (N N CO A W N CO 01 W N O O O O O 6 O O O O O L I— N Oc. O 0 0 0 O O O O Z D� �' GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CO Cr, A W N CO A CM N o cnOD co =O z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE (o Z o D COBBLES FINES O r GRAVEL SAND '--' - 1 Cl)a 0 Lo Z Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL n ^, • TP-25 0.5 ML sandy SILT N 0 TP-26 1.25 SM silty SAND with gravel MAPLEWOOD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN i{;;G CITY OF RENTON MAY 0 5 1999 RECEIVED Prepared for Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1215 120th Ave. N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc . 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (425) 455-5320 fFIE MAPLEWOOD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1215 120"' Ave. N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone - (425) 455-5320 FAX - (425) 453-7180 April 27, 1999 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110-BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H.BISHOP P E President TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENDER.PE.Vice President FACSIMILE(425)453-7180 April 27, 1999 Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1215 120th Ave. N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005-2135 Re: Maplewood Traffic Impact Analysis City of Renton Dear Ron, We are pleased to present this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Maplewood development consisting of 218 single-family units. The project is located south of S.E. 128th St. between 148th Ave. S.E. (extended) and 152nd Ave. S.E., in unincorporated King County in an area to be annexed by the City of Renton. We have prepared the analysis per the City of Renton letter dated February 2, 1998 that identified the 148th Ave S.E./S.E. 128th St. intersection for analysis and also a request from Neil Watts to analyze the 156th Ave. SE/SE 128th and the Duvall Rd. (138th Ave. S.E.)/NE 4th St. (S.E. 128th St.) intersections. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding road network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan. The plan consists of 203 single-family units. Access to the site will be provided by constructing the south leg of the existing of 148th Ave. SE/S.E. 128th S.E "T" intersection. A secondary access will be provided with a connection to S.E. 132Rd St. which in turn intersects 156th Ave. SE to the east of the site. A stub road located approximately at SE 135th St. may be provided fora future connection to 156th Ave SE through an adjacent parcel owned by the proponent. EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The project site presently is undeveloped. Roadway Facilities Figure 3 shows existing traffic control, number of roadway lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information. The primary roads within the study area are as follows: tiR Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY April 27, 1999 Page 2 S.E. 128th St. Principal Arterial Duvall Ave. N.E. (138th Ave. SE) Principal Arterial 144th Ave. S.E. Collector 156th Ave. S.E. Minor Arterial 148th Ave. S.E. Collector S.E. 132nd St. Local Access Transit Facilities Metro bus route 111 provides service along S.E. 128th St. to downtown Seattle. The closest bus stop is located at the 148th Ave. S.E./S.E. 128th St. intersection. This area is also served by METRO Route 908 which is a dial-a-ride transit (DART) route with every trip passing through the Renton Transit Center. Pedestrian Facilities Paved shoulders exist on S.E. 128th St. and 148`h Ave. S.E. No sidewalks have been built in the immediate area except on some of the internal streets of newer plats. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Figure 4 shows existing PM peak hour and average daily traffic volumes at pertinent intersections affected by site-generated traffic. Traffic count sheets are included in Appendix A. Level of Service Analysis Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic flow, and the perception of these conditions by drivers or passengers. These conditions include factors such as speed, delay, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Levels of service are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow, little delay) and LOS F the worst (congestion, long delays). Generally, LOS A and B are high, LOS C and D are moderate, and LOS E and F are low. Table 1 shows calculated levels of service (LOS) for existing conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The LOS were calculated using the procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)- Special Report 209, 3rd Edition updated December 1997. The 1997 HCM update revised the level of service at intersections and changed the level of service threshold to average control delay. The LOS and corresponding average control delay in seconds are as follows: K0423 I RPT.DOC 11R Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY April 27, 1999 Page 3 TYPE OF A B C D E F INTERSECTION Signalized < 10 > 10 and < 20 >20 and < 35 > 35 and < 55 > 55 and < 80 >80 Stop Sign Control < 10 > 10 and < 15 >15 and < 25 > 25 and < 35 > 35 and < 50 >50 Accident History The latest available King County 1996 accident data does not indicate unusual accident activity for major and minor arterial roads in the study area. During our field investigation there were no apparent safety deficiencies at the study intersections or streets. The accident rate is based on road section length; traffic volumes and total annual traffic accidents and is expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles traveled. The following table summarizes the accident data. I ' 1996 ACCIDENT DATA II Road Accident Rate Average Segment From To Classification for Road Accident Rate Segment for Road Class SE 128th St. Renton City line 156th Ave S.E. Principal Arterial 4.56 3.22 II 156th Ave. S.E. SE 128th St. SR 169 Minor Arterial 3.91 2.65 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT A horizon year of 2000 was assumed for the proposal. Figure 5 shows projected future PM peak hour volumes without the project. The PM peak hour volumes were generally determined to be critical. Future traffic volumes were estimated by increasing existing traffic volumes by the historical growth rate of 1% per year for the two year period from 1998 (when the base counts were taken), to 2000, the horizon year of the proposal. The historical growth rate was calculated using daily traffic volumes from King County Historical Traffic Counts 1987 to 1997. Traffic volumes generated from the proposed 112 unit Windwood plat were added to the future volumes. Traffic generated from any other proposed developments in the area is assumed to be included in the historic growth rate. K04231 RPT.DOC 11R Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY April 27, 1999 Page 4 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION The 218 single-family units of the Maplewood project are expected to generate the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours as shown below: 218 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS Time Period Trip Equation Trips Entering Trips Exiting Total Ln(T)=.920 Average Weekday 1061 1062 2123 Ln(X)+2.707 AM Peak Hour T=0.70(X) +9.477 41 (25%) 121 (75%) 162 Ln(T)=0.901 PM Peak Hour 139 (64%) r 78 (36%) 217 Ln(X)+0.527 The trip generation is calculated using the average trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997 for Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Land Use Code 210. A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. These trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. Children who live in this development may attend schools in either the Issaquah or Renton school district. Homes north of S.E. 132"d St. are in the Issaquah School District and homes south of S.E. 132nd St. are in the Renton School District. Figure 6 shows the distribution of the site-generated trips per the King County traffic model. The model shows 72% of the trips are oriented to the north and west of the site, 10% to the east and 18% to the south. All trips oriented to the east were assigned to the 148th Ave. S.E. intersection to reflect the worst case conditions at this unsi9nalized intersection. To the extent some vehicles use 156th Ave. S.E. to travel east, the 148t Ave. S.E. intersection would be improved. Figure 7 shows the estimated trip distribution and the calculated site-generated traffic volumes. The distribution is based on the King County traffic model, characteristics of the road network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (employment, shopping, social and recreational opportunities), expected travel times, and previous traffic studies. KO4231 rpt.doc t Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY April 27, 1999 Page 5 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Figure 8 shows the projected future PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. The site-generated PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 7 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure 8 volumes. Table 1 shows calculated LOS for 2000 with the project conditions at the pertinent road intersections. SIGHT DISTANCE AT THE SITE ACCESS ROAD The King County Road Standard requires 750 ft. of entering sight distance (ESD) and 550 ft. of stopping sight distance (SSD) for a design speed of 55 mph. The posted speed limit of 45 mph is equivalent to a design speed of 55 mph per King County Traffic Division. The ESD and SSD at the proposed 148th Ave SE site access road exceeds the standard in both the east and west directions along S. E. 128th Street. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS A two,way left turn lane is recommended to be constructed on the east leg of the 148th Ave SE/S.E. 128th St. intersection at the site access road. This will allow vehicles to turn left into the site without blocking westbound traffic. It is also recommended the existing left turn lane on the west leg of the intersection be restriped and converted to a two way left turn lane which will provide a lane for vehicles turning left out of the site to merge and accelerate with westbound traffic. Currently the east leg of S.E. 128th St. is four lanes wide with no middle turning lane at 148th Ave SE, therefore SE 128th St. must be widened to accommodate the two way left turn lane. Coordination between this proposal and the Windwood development is recommended since the Windwood plat is also widening SE 128th St. at their site access road at 154th Ave. SE. As shown in Table 1, the LOS for northbound left turns would improve from F to E and the southbound left turns would improve from F to C if the proposed two way left turn lane is constructed. Projected traffic volumes do not warrant installation of a traffic signal at this time per the Manual on Uniform Traffic control Devices, published by the Federal Highway Administration. It is also recommended to construct the south leg of 148th Ave. S.E. to provide separate northbound left/through and right turn lanes at the intersection with S.E. 128th St. so that left and right turning vehicles are not combined in one lane. By providing separate turning lanes, all of the available gaps in traffic on S.E. 128th St. can be utilized by left and right turning vehicles from 148th Ave. Southeast. The City of Renton requires a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 for each daily trip generated by the proposal. The estimated fee for the 2,123 daily trips generated by the proposal is $159,225. K04231rpt.doc Ronald F. Hughes, P.E. BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY April 27, 1999 Page 6 The City of Renton requires a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 for each daily trip generated by the proposal. The estimated fee for the 2,123 daily trips generated by the proposal is $159,225. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the Maplewood project be constructed as shown on the site plan with the following traffic impact mitigation measures: 1. Provide frontage improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalks and illumination along S.E. 128th St. to meet City of Renton standards. 2. Construct a two way left turn lane with appropriate tapers on the east leg of the S.E. 128th St./148`h Ave SE intersection to facilitate left turns into the site. Restripe the existing left turn pocket to a two way left turn lane on the west leg of the intersection to facilitate left turns out of the site. 3. Construct the south leg of the S.E. 128`h St./148th Ave SE intersection to provide access to the site. 4. Contribute the required City of Renton Traffic Mitigation fee. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions, please call Vince Geglia or me. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. VJG:sv Victor H. Bishop, P.E. President �pR H. B JS 41, 10350 V0 1ECIs7"8R°• StONALG EXPIRES wvi / 7 K04231 RPT.DOC TABLE 1 MAPLEWOOD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY PROJECTED EXISTING PROJECTED 2000 INTERSECTION 1998 2000 W/O W/PROJECT PROJECT F (SBLT 81) 148th Ave. S.E./S.E. 128th St. E (SBLT 36) E (SBLT 46) C (SNBLT 19.4)1 E (NBLT 46) 156th Ave. S.E./S.E. 128th St. B 11.5 B 11.8 B 11.8 Duvall Ave (138th Ave SE)/NE 4th C 29 C 30 C 33 St.(S.E. 128 St) 0 Number shown is the average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole, which determines the LOS for intersections per the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd Edition updated 1997. (XX) Movement and delay for left turn movements from minor side street approach at an unsignalized intersection. LOS and delay for left turn movements from minor side street approach with two way left turn lane constructed on S.E. 128th St. at 148th Ave SE. All other movements operate at LOS A or B. K04231rpt.doc - �.:::SY :.}:YZ . - ww• 2::::_. 0 ,,.,...,m1141 , , SE 6 th 0400>li# 6. '114-:,,,. P Mile ow kiiiii i. 11/4 :& Ia' ' 01 ainiv inrir4 . t:9a5:>t3 ::,> y ::::::::::Amin, . lir< _ owl t Wiwi -NNW '31 Nangak ...„,Dri JP= .�idi-- �; Sir 'my 111 , �` sF im„. . 4.5,...FrAtnlifi 4mi:1 • ' '''' ../dik rAi,.....E� iti . ili 3 4 arain Proj j t Z nIli�1i ,�� s1 e e ,.rrh . IR ItN,YA b 1 iv: fp,: :i .::::.i _: ...5m3'4olt9t1"i 3 11:l •■■ mamAa _ v; 11r111i _ V� r" • ' �:r.„i0,. .‘ nay ill Oar �!lk r 1011 RI lEzr:. �U SRRsn "�'� SE Jone• Rd iti %11' - I`/�j ton y cue < r' •It-• 4C11111 V ip `le Val/a Hw 111 r 'L*11 ��` ; ��i A nIAn F�a ` Sa War redille1111•111.44EAML1141 ‘141 Ltr, /C 1110. v gre, L \1150-400 Elm ,... niph i . .A. •0; ,..:0 f-i. qt .:i..-dig 'IaMitir I MI ~ 1 h S ? PIPIIN ate: # :I:% / �: 4&46i, ,imb,. aiiiiii5 L , ,. A _ En "Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resole, without permission. . All rights reserved." i- ,, . FIGURE VICINITY MAP il_ MAPLEWOOD 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS a i 4-4 -��.�r,.�rr -- SE 128th St. 76 a _ a�D —7 a ri a r st�� ra; ge gi :- iiipliw,._ 47,144 al i .4/000% it!, < --• 1�1 le.ir / SE 13 d St. iotari / lalti a t - - SC-- 1 tl 1a1 .. /�et��i�l "let' Lehi 1 , ;I ' mon -4 • - - - - ii I r A itiI SI i +}J �Il In _,sFLiitirct* _ ir $ lit .444", — 1 t- TV— AIM / �e* SITE PLAN FIGURE I MAPLEWOOD i 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J / 1 w w > Q > to ro � s o J not to scale •-v N NE 4th St. l$ — O �' 5L 35 mph 0 �,f l 4L 45 mph ` SE 128th St. O 11/1 J J N N 2L 2L SE 132nd St. SE 132nd St. b U) w ai ai > > Q t L d tD LU LEGEND O Traffic Control Signal c Yield Sign XX mph Posted Speed Limit —► Approach Lane & Direction XL Number of Roadway Lanes -\ FIGURE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPLEWOOD / 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Lil W ai > Q Q > s N co o co not to scale Tuesday Thursday Thursday 2/16/99 i 0 4:15-5:15 PM 2/17/98 2/12/98 NJ NJ-4- ..1 81 N� 4:30-5:30 PM 4:30-5:30 PM � L �--543 - �—423 NE 4th St. r 1114 SE 128th St. ) 1 ~'282 Rr 198 973 I 11081 712--0- I i 42� Nood- 413'• m-a) w w V) V) > > Q Q L L (D d U) LEGEND X1 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction i— EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES !^ (FIGURE\ 1 _ MAPLEWOOD i 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J \ J I w w (A U) ai ai QQ t N co o not to scale a 3 o cn roN� �185 cI It- o I i 554 r ` 6�0 �—432 NE 4th St. I� r 14 SE 128th St. 't— 0r-202 186' 69—'� 2� NI * I 992—i i 1190� 726--• 43"k cn�'4- 421� U)rn N w W a; ai > > Q Q = L d- in LEGEND \ X--' PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction FIGURE FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT (� MAPLEWOOD 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ( SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION ernm2 I LINKS: ltyp.TS E' 6) THRESHOLD: UPPER: 999999 y Ali 1.1 ` i �_ ' > u• �. 4.104. Wilkple47 ' ' i 'i i " � SCALE: 10 ,I 0 /�, 40 6 a.‘ . .., __ ‘,„,-.- . 80 100 ' ' d b 1 t.l _ /14530.5 I \ 405535/D15650.8 EMME/2 PROJECT: King County TCM 98-04-06 13:35 SCENARIO 4100: Sit• 98033001 Distribution. Parent Zone 449 MODULE: 2.13 KINCCNTY...at9 1 / KING COUNTY TRAFFIC MODEL TRIP DISTRIBUTION �� FIGURE� MAPLEWOOD 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS w N, U) b' ¢ a ¢ `0 - o N N co o not to scale e, O g > rn 10% 45% MI _20 31 I NE 4th St. i "0-35�55) SE 128th St. 71% r-14(4) 10% -4--14(4) (18)63—► (29)99-11/4 ) 1 I (12)8—► 2;7 I cn _ PO I N—64(99) r-1(1) L 4"1---1,(1') I (1)1-0- I j , I LE 132nd St. `. I(21)13— NI I J 1 N J N Project j LLJ Site ,; > > a a AM PM ENTER 41 139 �' EXIT 121 78 TOTAL 162 217 LEGEND a ,(W)--► AM Peak Hour Traffic ,Volume & Direction ` X --► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction r d FIGURE PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION MAPLEWOOD 11 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I w w N� v 6 il L N °�,° o not to scale 0 3 0 in v c�clir) '__205 ' -'t N._20 L0 0 r L --589 ) I -0--630 .-446 NE 4th St. r 14 SE 128th st. + r 14 ) r 202 186-1 1055--► I i 1190--► /1 f 734. I 43'41/4 N�� 99� �1 421� �rn in I . L 132nd St. j ___I Project ,; Site ,; Q > > Q L L d' (0 d In LEGEND X—► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction I FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT /^ (FIGURE- 1 _ ___ MAPLEWOOD ✓ 8 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS XION3dd V r 2 TC Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184111 Avenue NE,Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 IITurning Movement Diagram 158 ra , 85 73 SE 1281h Ave 42 43 SE 128th Ave 20 624 1 582 1602 I 1785 I l 1753 53 1161 1108 -- 11151 V Check In: 1848 Out: 1848 • %HV PHF -Intersection: 148th Ave SE @ SE 128th Ave EB 0.8% 0.93 Location: Renton WB 0.3% 0.93 Date of Count: Th 2/12/98 NB n/a n/a Peak Period: 4:30 P - 5:30 P SB 0.0% 0.79 Checked By: Kg Intersection 0.6% 0.97 Prepared For: T P & E TM98-77y 1 rrC42 1 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone:(425)861 8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: 148th Ave SE @ SE 128th Ave Date of Count: Th 2/12/98 Location: Renton Checked By: Kg Time From North on (SB) From South on (ND) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval 148th Ave SE n/a SE 128th Ave SE 128th Ave Total Ending at T L S f1 I L S k I L SHIL S 14 ' 4:15 P 0 4 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 2 2 17 239 0 437 4:30 P 0 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 139 ' 6 2 9 244 0 417 4:45 P 0 14 0 ' 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 154 i 8 • 4 10 275 0 474 5 00 P 0 5 ' 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 3 2 8 295 0 458 5:15 P 0 13 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 155 3 1 16 245 0 444 5,30 P 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 6 2 19 293 0 472 5:45 P 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 4 0 16 259 ' 0 438 6.00 P 0 11 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 7 0 22 265 0 460 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 7:OOP 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 0 69 0 84 0 0 0 0 2 0 1176 39 13 117 2115 0 3600 4:30 P to 5:30 P Peak Flour Summary 1 otal 0 43 0 42 0 0 0 0 2 0 582 20 - 9 53 1108 0 - 1848 Approach 85 0 602 1I 1 1848 %HV 0% n/a 0% 1% 1% PHI'= _ 0.79 n/a 0.93 0.93 . 0.97 Legend: T=Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R= Right-Turn 1 IV=Heavy Vehicles PIIF=Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4'Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: T P& E TM98-77y 1 • Ill. - KAIHY PAGE 08 2 T� Traffic Could Consu/lan/s, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE,Woodinville,WA.98072 ~ Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 Turning Movement Diagram I A 3 5 2 J A SE 128th St 5 0 0 1 SE 128th St �--.• 0 A I I s 423 621 [ 1704 - I ..________-------- -, „2.,-,-.:- 198 1430 2 _i...__ IP 1127 712 ;' 1 (i' 809 413 ~` • • U .\Kma 0 97 W i u d 611 246 Check In: 1999 'o -.-__-_-__ —857 I Out: 1999 %HV PHF Intersection: SE 128th St @ 156th Ave SE EH 0.9% 0.96 Location: Renton WB 0.6% 0.96 Date of Count: Thurs 2/12198 NB 0.4% 0.96 Peak Period: 4:30 P - 5:30 P SB 0.0% 0.42 Checked By: rns Intersection 0.8% 0.98 Prepared For: TP&E TM98-76z 3 UL/ 1J/ 17O ID: Li 1.-uZ5-55(-ti24b TCC - KATHY PAGE 09 T C2 Traffic Count Conrultaa Inc. �i 13623 184111 Ave NE,Woodinville,WA 98072 Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: SE 128th St @ 156th Ave SE Date of Count Thurs 2/12/98 Location: Renton Checked By. ms Time From North on (SB) From South on(NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Driveway 156th Ave SE SE 128th St SE 128th St Total Ending at T L S • R T L S - A T L - S A T - L S A 4:15 P 0 1 0 1 2 + 44 . 0 25 2 ' Ig ' iO1 - 0 ' 4 1 160 - 80 452 4:00 P 0 1 ' 0 r 1 1 53 0 23 1 ha ' 1b1 0 1 6 ' 161 05 ' 400 4:45 P 0 0 0 « 3 0 34 0 26 3 42 109 0 4 0 175 107 496 5:00 P 0 0 0 1 0 36 ' 0 27 1 51 102 0 3 2 195 96 512 + 4 5:15 P 0 0 0 1 _ 1 41 0 23 0 52 109 0 1 0 171 95 492 5:30 P 0--. 0 1 0 ' 0 0 311 0 21 0 53 103 0 ' 2 0 171 113 499 5:45 P 0 0 1 0 0 0 47 0 22 0 64 93 0 0 0 184 99 489 r 6130 P 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 22 0 52 100 0 2 0 195 78 506 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 ' 0 -0 -4- 0 0 0 4- 0 0 1 0 ' 0 700P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total - Survey _ 0 _ 2 0 7 4 352 0 199 7 416 818 0 17 3 1392 755 3934 4:30 P to 5:30 P Peak Hour Summary Total 0 0• 0 6 1 - 140 [ 0 ' 97 - d- in [ 429 0 10 - 2 1 712 411 1999 Approach 5 246 1127 1999 %HV 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% PHF 0 42 b 96 0 98 0.96 0.98 Legend: T-Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R=Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles PI IF=Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4'Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: TP&E 1M90762 4 1 I—,2 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425)861-8877 Turning Movement Diagram 1158 F• .ca 787 371 • NE 4th ST 294 23 470 138th Ave SE(Duvall Ave) A V • - n 181 862 4 543 738 2059 . 14 2185 • 182 1197 973 1447 V 42 A V 25 8 4 • 79 37 Check In: 2759 M < 116 > Out: 2759 %HV PHF Intersection: NE 4th St (SE 128th) cLD 138th Ave SE (Duvall EB 0.7% 0.95 Location: Renton WB 0.4% 0.92 Date of Count: Tues 2/16/99 NB 0.0% 0.77 Peak Period: 4:15 P - 5:15 P SB 0.4% 0.94 Checked By: LBP Intersection 0.5% 0.97 Prepared For: TP&E TM-99v091 5 C2 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE,Woodinville,WA 98072 Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: NE 4th St(SE 128th)@ 138th Ave SE(Duvall Ave) Date of Count: Tues 2/16/99 Location: Renton Checked By: LBP Time From North on (SB) From South on(NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval #REF! 138th Ave SE 138th Ave SE(Duvall Ave) NE 4th ST Total Ending at T L S R T L SRTL SRTL SR 4:15 P 0 123 8 70 0 3 6 2 1 3 125 45 4 41 206 11 643 4:30 P 1 124 4 71 0 6 0 1 0 3 148 38 4 32 247 10 684 4:45 P 2 124 9 77 0 6 2 1 0 5 110 43 ' '`3 39 250 11 677''', 5:00 P 0 103 4 75 0 5 3 1 2 4 145 51 1 56 226 12 685 5:15 P 0 119 6 71'_ 0 8 3 1 1 2 140 49 0 55 250 9 713 5:30 P 0 102 7 81 0 3 0 - 2 0 3 121 45 2 52 243 17 676 5:45 P 1 110 7 62 1 5 4 0 1 2 139 35 1 52 205 6 » 627 6:00 P 0 108 9 77 0 6 3 1 1 3 111 34 1 44 223 10 629 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0' 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45`P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! .0 0 7:OOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 4 913 54 584 1 42 21 9 6 25 1039 340 16 371 1850 86 5334 4:15 P to 5:15 P Peak Hour Summary Total 3 470 23 294 0 25 _ 8 4 3 14 543 181 8 182 973 42 2759 Approach 787 37 738 1197 2759 %HV 0% 0% 0% 1% 1 PHF 0.94 0.77 0.92 0.95 0.97 Legend: T. Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L= Left-Turn S.Straight R. Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4*Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: TP&E TM-99v091 6 • Mwoodex.txt HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: VG Intersection: 148TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST Count Date: EXISTING 2/17/98 Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 12 Volume: 53 1108 582 20 43 42 HFR: 53 1108 582 20 43 42 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Page 1 7 Mwoodex.txt Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10, 11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Westbound Shared in volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 , 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 t by 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 J.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 Page 2 8 Mwoodex.txt t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 301 Potential Capacity 701 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 701 Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 602 Potential Capacity 985 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 985 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 i Conflicting Flows 1252 Potential Capacity 167 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Mai. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.96 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 160 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I I II I I II I v(vph) 53 43 42 C m(vph) 985 638 481 160 v/c 0.05 0.27 0.06 95% queue length Control Delay 8.9 35.5 10.5 LOS A E B Approach Delay 23.1 Approach LOS C Page 3 9 Mwoodfwo.txt HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: VG Intersection: 148TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST Count Date: FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 12 Volume: 69 1190 630 20 44 48 HFR: 69 1190 630 20 44 48 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Page 1 10 Mwoodfwo.txt Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 i 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 t by 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 Page 2 11 Mwoodfwo.txt t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 325 Potential Capacity 677 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 677 Probability of Queue free St. 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 650 Potential Capacity 946 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 946 Probability of Queue free St. 0.93 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1373 , Potential Capacity 139 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 Movement Capacity 132 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I I II I I II I v(vph) 69 99 48 C m(vph) 946 594 452 132 v/c 0.07 0.33 0.07 95% queue length Control Delay 9.1 45.5 10.7 LOS A E B Approach Delay 27.4 Approach LOS D Page 3 12 MWOODWOTWLTL.TXT HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: VG Intersection: 148TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST Count Date: FUTURE WITH PRO WoTWLTL Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 69 1190 99 14 630 20 55 1 8 44 1 48 HFR: 69 1190 99 14 630 20 55 1 8 44 1 48 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Page 1 13 MWOODWOTWLTL.TXT Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 ' 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Page 2 14 * MWOODWOTWLTL.TXT Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 645 325 Potential Capacity 420 677 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 420 677 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1289 650 Potential Capacity 545 946 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 545 946 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 0.93 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 2056 2095 Potential Capacity 56 53 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity 51 48 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.98 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1721 1402, Potential Capacity 59 102 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0.88 0.89 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.91 0.91 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.85 0.89 Movement Capacity 50 91 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Page 3 15 MWOODWOTWLTL.TXT Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I I II I II I v(vph) 55 1 8 44 1 48 Movement Capacity 50 51 420 91 48 677 Shared Lane Capacity 50 89 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I II I I II I v(vph) 69 14 56 8 45 48 C m(vph) 946 545 50 420 89 677 v/c 0.07 0.03 1.13 0.02 0.50 0.07 95% queue length Control Delay 9.1 11.8 299.2 13.7 80.9 10.7 LOS A B F B F B Approach Delay 263.5 44.7 Approach LOS F E Page 4 16 Mwoodfw.txt HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: VG Intersection: 148TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST Count Date: FUTURE WITH PRO W TWLTL Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 69 1190 99 14 630 20 55 1 8 44 1 48 HFR: 69 1190 99 14 630 20 55 1 8 44 1 48 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 I Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 4 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Page 1 17 Mwoodfw.txt Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10, 11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Comp}iting Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Page 2 18 • Mwoodfw.txt 2 stage 4.1 4.1 6.5 5.5 6.9 6.5 5.5 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations:. Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 645 325 Potential Capacity 420 677 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 420 677 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1289 650 Potential Capacity 545 946 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 545 996 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 0.93 Worksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 1378 668 Potential Capacity 214 459 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.97 Movement Capacity 199 448 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 678 1427 Potential Capacity 455 203 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.93 Movement Capacity 443 188 Page 3 19 Mwoodfw.txt Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2056 2095 Potential Capacity 56 53 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity 51 48 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.98 0.98 Y 0.46 3.17 C t 190 169 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 0.99 Worksheet 7b - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 1378 668 Potential Capacity 155 419 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.97 Movement Capacity 144 408 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 344 734 Potential Capacity 651 383 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity 588 346 Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1721 1402 Potential Capacity 59 102 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 0.90 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.92 0.92 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.90 Movement Capacity 50 92 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.98 0.98 Y 0.20 1.32 Page 4 20 Mwoodfw.txt C t 140 299 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I I II I I II I v(vph) 55 1 8 44 1 48 Movement Capacity 140 190 420 299 169 677 Shared Lane Capacity 141 294 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I I II I I II I v(vph) 69 14 56 8 45 48 C m(vph) 946 545 141 420 294 677 v/c 0.07 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.15 0.07 95% queue length Control Delay 9.1 11.8 46.4 13.7 19.4 10.7 LOS A B E B C B Approach Delay 42.3 14.9 Approach LOS E B Page 5 21 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 15:10:24 EXISTING PM PK SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1 .00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 294 I 23 I 470 II I I WIDTHS 112 .0 112 .0 112 .0 II I v LANES I 1 I 1 I 1 II I I I II \ 181 12.0 1 / I \ /I \ -- 543 24.0 2 I 182 12.0 1 / + / 14 12 .0 1 North 973 24.0 2 -- \ I / 42 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 25 I 8 I 4 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 76 I 0.0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YYYY I I 0 1 1 1 0 1 OVERLP NNNN II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 22 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 15:10:12 EXISTING PM PK SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.67 Vehicle Delay 29.1 Level of Service C Sq 76 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** + + * A + + * ++++ /I \ <+ + *> <++++ I A ++++ A A ++++ I A **** V ++++ ++++ V North <* * *> ++++> ****> 1 * * * ++++ **** * .* * V v G/C=0.342 I G/C=0.064 I G/C=0.064 I G/C=0.000 G/C=0.353 I G= 30.8" I G= 5.7" I G= 5.7" I G= 0.0" I G= 31.7" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=38.7% I OFF=49.5% I OFF=60.3% I OFF=60.3% C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82 .2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 1 Lane (Width/ 1 g/C 1 Service Rate' Adj 1 1 HCM I L 190% Maxl 1 Group 1 Lanese Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E IVolumeI v/c 1 Delay I S 1 Queue 1 N Approach 31.4 C 1 RT 1 12/1 10.274 10.342 1 433 1 542 1 309 10.570 1 25.6 1 C+l 257 ftl 1 TH 1 12/1 10.126 10.342 1 519 ( 637 1 24 10.038 1 19.7 1 B 1 25 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.345 10.342 1 491 1 606 1 495 10.817 1 35.6 I *D+I 412 ftl S Approach 42 .7 D+ ILT+TH+RTC 12/1 10.134 10.064 1 1 1 84 1 38 10.373 1 42 .7 I *D+I 45 ftl E Approach 22 .4 C+ 1 RT 1 12/1 10.206 10.353 1 451 ( 558 1 191 10.342 1 21.8 1 C+I 156 ftl 1 TH 1 24/2 10.227 10.353 ( 1100 1 1248 1 572 10.458 1 22 .8 1 C+I 234 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.001 10.064 1 148 1 192 1 15 10.077 1 18.5 1 B 1 25 ftl W Approach 31.2 C 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.347 10.353 1 1093 1 1240 1 1068 10.861 1 33.5 l *C 1 437 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.025 10.064 1 270 1 330 1 192 10.582 1 18.5 I *B 1 131 ftl 23 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 15:21:59 FUTURE W/O PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 300 I 23 I 479 II I I WIDTHS 12 .0 112 .0 112 .0 II I v LANES I 1 I 1 I 1 II I I I II \ 185 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 554 24.0 2 I 186 12 .0 1 / + / 14 12 .0 1 North 992 24.0 2 -- \ I / 43 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 26 I 8 I 4 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 76 II 0.0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YYYY 0 1 1 I O I OVERLP NNNN 1 II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 24 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 15:12:35 FUTURE W/O PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.69 Vehicle Delay 29.7 Level of Service C Sq 76 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I **/** + + * A + + * ++++ / I\ <+ + *> <++++ I VA ++++ A A ++++ I A **** v ++++ ++++ v North <* * *> ++++> ****> I * * * ++++ **** * * * v V I G/C=0.343 I G/C=0.063 I G/C=0.063 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.354 I G= 30.9" I G= 5. 6" I G= 5.6" I G= 0.0" I G= 31 .8" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=38.7% I OFF=49.5% I OFF=60.2% I OFF=60.2% I C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82 .2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/I g/C I Service RateI Adj I I HCM ( L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 32 .1 C I RT 112/1 10.278 10.343 I 434 I 543 I 316 10.582 I 25.9 I C+I 263 ftl I TH 112/1 10.126 10.343 I 521 I 639 I 24 10.038 I 19.7 I B I 25 ftl I LT 112/1 10.349 10.343 I 492 I 607 I 504 10.830 I 36.6 I *D+I 419 ftl S Approach 43.0 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.134 10.063 I 1 I 82 I 39 10.390 I 43.0 I *D+I 46 ftl E Approach 22 .5 C+ I RT 112/1 10.208 10.354 I 453 I 560 I 195 10.348 I 21.8 I C+I 159 ftl I TH 124/2 10.230 10.354 11105 11252 I 583 0.466 I 22.8 I C+I 238 ftl I LT 112/1 10.001 10.063 I 145 I 190 I 15 I0.077 I 18.7 I B I 25 ftl W Approach 32.2 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.352 10.354 11097 11244 11089 10.875 I 34.5 I *C 1445 ftl I LT 112/1 10.028 10.063 I 265 I 325 I 196 10.603 I 19.5 ( *B 1134 ftl 25 MAPLEWOOD 03/05/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 13:00:56 FUTURE WITH PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 300 I 23 I 515 II I I WIDTHS 12.0 112 .0 112 .0 II I v LANES I 1 I 1 I 1 II I I II \ 205 12.0 1 . / I . \ /I\ -- 589 24.0 2 I I 186 12 .0 1 / + / 14 12 .0 1 North 1 1055 24 .0 2 -- \ I / 43 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 26 I 8 I 4 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 76 III 0.0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YYYY III 0 I 1 I 0 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 26 MAPLEWOOD 03/05/99 NE 4TH ST/DUVALL AVE 13:00:11 FUTURE WITH PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.72 Vehicle Delay 32 .6 Level of Service C Sq 76 I Phase 1 l Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I + + * A + + * ++++ / I \ <+ + *> <++++ 1A ++++ A A ++++ A **** v ++++ ++++ v North <* * *> ++++> ****> I * * * ++++ **** * * I G/C=0.347 I G/C=0.060 I G/C=0.060 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.355 I G= 31.3" I G= 5.4" l G= 5.4" I G= 0.0" I G= 32.0" I I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=39.2% I OFF=49.6% I OFF=60.0% I OFF=60.0% I C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82 .2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 1 Lane (Width/ I g/C 1 Service Rate' Adj 1 1 HCM I L 190% Max' 1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c 1 Delay I S 1 Queue 1 N Approach 35.2 D+ 1 RT 1 12/1 10.278 10.347 1 442 1 550 1 316 10.575 1 25.4 1 C+I 261 ftl 1 TH 1 12/1 10.126 10.347 1 530 1 647 1 24 10.037 1 19.4 1 B 1 25 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.368 10.347 1 501 1 615 1 542 10.881 1 41.6 I *D+l 447 ftl S Approach 43.7 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.134 10.060 I 1 I 77 1 39 10.411 1 43.7 I *D+I 46 ftl E Approach 22 .7 C+ 1 RT 1 12/1 10.220 10.355 1 457 1 563 1 216 10.384 1 22 .1 1 C+I 176 ftl 1 TH 1 24/2 10.239 10.355 1 1112 1 1258 1 620 10.493 1 23.0 1 C+I 253 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.002 10.060 1 140 1 184 1 15 10.079 1 19.4 1 B 1 25 ftl W Approach 36.9 D+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 . 10.368 10.355 1 1104 1 1250 1 1156 10.925 1 39.5 I *D+I 471 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.034 10.060 1 248 1 306 I 196 10.641 1 21.6 I *C+I 134 ftl 27 4 ' f MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 15:42:18 EXISTING PM PK SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I. I Key: VOLUMES -- >- I 0 I 0 I 0 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 0 I 0 II I I I II \ 0 0.0 0 . / I \ /I\ -- 423 24 .0 2 I I 0 0.0 0 / + / 198 12 .0 1 North I 712 24.0 2 -- \ I / 413 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 149 I 0 I 97 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 12 I II 12 .0 I 0.0 112 .0 I PERMSV YYYY I II 1 I 0 1 1 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD • 28 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 15:41:32 EXISTING PM PK SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.55 Vehicle Delay 11 .5 Level of Service B+ Sq 12 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/** /I\ <++++ <++++ I **** ++++ I v v North <* +> ****> 1 * + **** * + v I G/C=0.174 I G/C=0.115 I G/C=0.511 I I G= 10.4" I G= 6.9" I G= 30.7" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24.1% I OFF=42 .2% I C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12 .0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I S Approach 23.4 C+ I RT 112/1 10.099 10.174 I 209 I 275 I 102 10.371 I 22 .7 I C+1 71 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.126 10.174 1 238 1 308 1 157 10.510 1 23.9 I *C+I 109 ftl E Approach 5.4 A TH 1 24/2, 10.152 10.693 I 2452, 1 2452 I 445 ,10.181 1 3.3 1 A 1. ,.. 58 ftl. 1 LT 1 12/1 10.056 10.115 1 308 1 346 1 208 10.601 I 9.9 1 *A I 54 ftl W Approach 12.3 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.369 10.511 1 1699 1 1708 1 1184 10.693 1 12 .3 1 *B+1 244 ftl 29 • r .. MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 15:44:15 FUTURE W/O PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 0 I 0 I 0 II I I WIDTHS 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 II 1 v LANES I 0 1 0 I 0 II I I I II \ 0 0.0 0 . / I \ / I\ -- 432 24.0 2 I 1 0 0.0 0 / + / 202 12.0 1 North 1 726 24.0 2 -- \ I / 421 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 152 I 0 I 99 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 12 I II 12 .0 1 0.0 1 12 .0 I PERMSV YYYY 1 11 1 1 0 1 1 1 OVERLP NNNN I 11 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD • 30 MAPLEWOOD 02/24/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 15:43:58 FUTURE W/O PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.56 Vehicle Delay 11.8 Level of Service B+ Sq 12 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/** /I\ <++++ <++++ I **** ++++ I v v North <* +> ****> I * + **** * + v I G/C=0.174 I G/C=0.114 I G/C=0.513 I 1 G= 10.4" I G= 6.8" I G= 30.8" I I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24.0% I OFF=42 .1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12 .0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service RateI Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi 1 Group 1 Lanes' Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E !Volume' v/c 1 Delaly 1 S 1 Queue 1 S Approach 23.6 C+ 1 RT 112/1 10.101 10.174 1 209 1 275 1 104 10.378 1 22 .8 1 C+I 72 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.127 10.174 1 237 1 307 1 160 10.521 1 24.1 I *C+I 111 ftl E Approach 5.8 A I TH 1 24/2 10.155 10.693 1 2452 1 2452 1 455 10.186 1 3.3 1 A 1 59 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.062 10.114 I 298 I 337 1 213 10.632 1 11.2 1 *B+1 55 ftI W Approach 12.5 B+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.376 10.513 1 1706 1 1714 1 1207 10.704 1 12 .5 I *B+I 248 ftl 11 " 4' MAPLEWOOD 03/05/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 13:03:33 FUTURE WITH PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1 .00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 0 I 0 I 0 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 0 I 0 II I I I it \ 0 0.0 0 . / I \ /I\ -- 446 24.0 2 I I 0 0.0 0 / + / 202 12 .0 1 North I 734 24.0 2 -- \ I / 421 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 152 I 0 I 99 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 12 I II 12 .0 I 0.0 112 .0 I PERMSV YYYY I II 1 ) 0 I 1 1 OVERLP NNNN j II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 19 9. MAPLEWOOD 03/05/99 156TH AVE SE/SE 128TH ST 13:02:37 FUTURE WITH PROJECT SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.56 Vehicle Delay 11.8 Level of Service B+ Sq 12 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/** /I\ <++++ <++++ **** ++++ I v v North <* +> ****> i * + **** * + v I G/C=0.173 I G/C=0.113 I G/C=0.514 I I G= 10.4" I G= 6.8" I G= 30.8" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24.0% I OFF=42 .0% I C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12 .0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/l g/C I Service RateI Adj I I HCM I Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E 'Volume I L 190% Maxl I v/c I Delay Y I S I Queue I S Approach 23.7 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.101 10.173 1 208 1 274 1 104 10.380 1 22.8 1 C+I 73 ftl I LT 112/1 10.127 10.173 1 236 1 306 I 160 10.523 1 24.2 I *C+I 112 ftl E Approach 5.9 A I TH 124/2 10.159 10.694 1 2455 1 2455 1 469 10.191 I 3.3 1 A I 61 ftl I LT 112/1 10.063 10.113 1 295 1 334 I 213 10.638 1 11.5 I *B+I 55 ftl W Approach 12.5 B+ I TH+RT1 24/2 10.378 10.514 1 1711 1 1719 1 1216 10.707 1 12 .5 I *B+I 249 ftl • 33 +►, 91 -009 , Pp C.y • TERRA ASSOCIATES Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences April28, 1999 Project No.T-2798 Mr.Ron Hughes Burnstead Construction Company '-=COp /14 1215 -Bellevue Oth Avenue NE,Washin ton 98 OSSuite 201 City l��RENTgfvpi , g NAY oN U 1999 Subject: Wildlife and Habitat Evaluation Maplewood Renton,Washington `D Dear Mr.Hughes: As requested, we have conducted a wildlife and habitat evaluation of the Maplewood site located on the south side of SE 128th Street in Renton, Washington. The purpose of our work was to examine the site conditions in order to identify habitats and potential wildlife use of the property. The City of Renton has no specific requirements for wildlife studies, but this evaluation was conducted in accordance with general wildlife and habitat study requirements as specified by King County. These results are suitable for use in an Environmental Impact Statement or in preparation of a SEPA checklist. Our scope of work included a site visit on June 22, 1998, at which time we completed our site evaluation. Six previous site visits were made in January and May 1995 to delineate wetlands on the property. During a follow-up site visit on April 7, 1999, we located and delineated two very small, additional wetlands. We have contacted the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to request database searches to identify documented occurrences of sensitive, endangered, or threatened species in the project vicinity. This letter summarizes the results of our site evaluation. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located south of SE 128th Street and east of 148th Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of approximately 62.73 acres located north of SE 136th Street and between 148th Avenue SE and 152nd Avenue SE. The northern edge of this parcel is irregular, with a portion extending as far as SE 128th Street; small parcels adjacent to 128th Street SE are excluded. Most of the surrounding property is undeveloped, although there are existing residential subdivisions east and west of the property on SE 132nd Street and on SE 136th Street, southeast and southwest of the site. A King County park area is located south and southwest of the property. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 The site is currently undeveloped and is covered by second- or third-growth forest, dominated by broadleaf deciduous trees, but conifers are common in some areas. Common tree species on the site include big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). Dominant understory plant species include vine maple (Acer circinatum), salmonberry (Rub us spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). Other plant species observed on the property are listed on Table 1. Only one soil type, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, is mapped on the property (King County Soil Survey, U. S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). Alderwood soil is described as a moderately well-drained soil formed under conifers in glacial deposits. It has a consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. The Alderwood soil is not included on the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils listing of hydric soils. Our observations of soil conditions on the upland portions of the property are generally consistent with the description for this soil type. Topographically, the property slopes from a high area at the northeast corner to a low area in the southwest corner. The northern portion of this parcel has some relief between low ridges and drainages, but the south and west areas are relatively flat. This parcel has several stream corridors and wetland areas, generally draining in a northeast to southwest direction. WILDLIFE HABITATS-VEGETATION COVER TYPES The subject property has three vegetation cover types, as shown on Figure 2. These include second-growth broadleaf forest, forested wetland, and moderately-vegetated suburban habitats. These cover types are based on the habitat categories used by King County(1987). Second-Growth Lowland Broadleaf Deciduous Forest Most of the Maplewood property (approximately 58.73 acres) is occupied by a second-growth broadleaf forest. This habitat type covers virtually all of the property, except for the wetlands and a very small area on SE 128th Street. Dominant tree species in this habitat are big-leaf maple and red alder, with relatively few conifers, including Douglas fir, western hemlock, and western red cedar. Conifers generally constitute less than 10 percent of the canopy cover, but they may be as much as 25 percent in some areas. This habitat has a dense understory of vine maple, salmonberry, red elderberry, and Himalayan blackberry. Sword fern is the most abundant herbaceous groundcover plant. Because of the vegetative diversity of this habitat and the proximity to the wetlands and intermittent streams, this habitat is expected to have a high diversity of wildlife species. Several species of salamanders, frogs, and reptiles could be present in this habitat. Bird species that could be present in this habitat include sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri), winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes), Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus), Wilson's warbler(Wilsonia pusilla), and dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Project No. T-2798 Page No. 2 Mr.Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 Mammals expected in this area include common opossum (Didelphis virginiana), dusky shrew (Sorex obscurus), mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa), Douglas' squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii), raccoon (Procyon lotor), coyote (Canis latrans), and black-tailed deer(Odocoileus hemionus). Forested Wetland and Riparian Zone Forested wetland or riparian habitat is present in eight wetland areas on the Maplewood property, including a riparian zone adjacent to the intermittent stream channel that crosses the property. The total area of this habitat is approximately 3.54 acres. This habitat is dominated by red alder and western red cedar with a dense shrub layer of salmonberry and vine maple. Himalayan blackberry is common in many areas near the edges of the wetlands. Common herbaceous plants include slough sedge (Carex obnupta), skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum), lady-fern(Athyrium filix femina), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). The forested wetlands associated with intermittent streams are likely to have the greatest diversity of animal species of the habitats on this property. This habitat has high vegetative diversity and seasonal surface water in the stream channels, and it is continuous with the forested area. Several species of salamanders and frogs could be present close to the stream channels. Common bird species in this habitat include northern flicker(Colaptes auratus), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus), yellow-rumped warbler (Dendroica coronata), and rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus). Mammals expected in this habitat include common opossum, deer mouse, Oregon vole (Microtus oregoni), and raccoon. Moderately Vegetated Suburban Habitat A very small area near a house on SE 128th Street has been landscaped and is planted with a variety of native and ornamental trees and shrubs. The lawn area is dominated by Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), with some weedy herbaceous species. This residential habitat occupies approximately 0.46 acres. The habitat has a relatively low value for wildlife, other than species that have adapted to human presence and disturbances common in residential areas. Typical species in this habitat would include American robin, European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), house sparrow (Passer domesticus), eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), and deer mouse. WILDLIFE Wildlife species that could potentially be present in the habitats on the Maplewood site are listed on Table 2. These lists are based on personal observations on the site and on data available in the Wildlife Habitat Profile prepared by the King County Open Space Program (1987). These lists include all species that could be found in large undisturbed areas of habitat. Sites with small patches of habitat surrounded by roads,residential areas, or other development will have relatively few of the possible species. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 3 Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 Amphibians and Reptiles No amphibians or reptiles were observed during our site visits, although favorable habitats are available. These species are generally secretive and are relatively inactive in cool weather. Species of salamanders, frogs, snakes, and lizards that could be expected in the habitats on this property are listed on Table 2. The seasonal availability of surface water in the wetlands and intermittent stream channels provides a habitat feature required by most amphibians. The second-growth forest and the wetlands are the habitats that are most likely to be used. Most amphibians are unlikely to use the open pasture or the suburban area around the house and commercial property. Pacific chorus frogs are one of the most common species of amphibians in this vicinity and are tolerant of a wide range of habitats. Other common amphibians in this vicinity include northwestern salamander (Ambystoma gracile), long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum), and ensatina(Ensatina eschscholtzii). Relatively few species of reptiles are present in western Washington. The northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea) and garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) are the only reptiles likely to be present on the Maplewood site. This site has no suitable habitat for either of the turtle species found in the Puget Sound region. Birds Because of their high level of daytime activity and vocalizations, birds are the most likely group of animals to be observed. Several species of songbirds were observed on the property, including western wood-pewee (Contopus sordidulus), song sparrow, American robin, dark-eyed junco, Bewick's wren (Thryomanes bewicki), and western tanager (Piranga ludoviciana). A list of bird species observed and/or expected to be present in habitats found on this site is given on Table 2. The only woodpeckers observed on the site were the northern flicker and the downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens). However, characteristic rectangular pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) excavations were observed in some snags in the forested areas. No pileated woodpecker nests were located, and the site has very few snags large enough to contain a nest cavity for these woodpeckers. Several species of raptors could make use of habitats on this site. Red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) are common in this vicinity and would be expected on this site, but none were observed. Other possible raptors in this vicinity include Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperi), sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus), and great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). No raptor nests were located during our site visit. Mammals Most mammals tend to be secretive and nocturnal, and our observations reflect a relatively small proportion of species that may actually exist on the subject property. Human activity related to development on surrounding property and trails on the site may also limit the number of mammal species that might be able to use this site. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 4 Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 We found evidence of several mammals during our site visit. Additional mammals that could be expected on the site are listed on Table 2. Two dead Townsend's moles (Scapanus townsendi) were found on the old road between the east and west parcels. Mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa) burrows were found in several locations in the forested area, and a Douglas' squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii) was heard calling in the forest. Coyote (Canis latrans) scat was present in several places on the roadways around the perimeter of the property. Raccoon (Procyon lotor) tracks were seen in mud on the road on the western edge of the property. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus) tracks were also seen on the roads and on narrow game trails through the property. Other mammals likely to be present on the site include opossum, eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), eastern gray squirrel, deer mouse, and a variety of bats. Wildlife Corridors The 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan includes a Wildlife Habitat Network Map showing a system of wildlife corridors. These corridors are intended to improve wildlife protection by providing connections among wildlife habitat areas and refuges. No wildlife corridors are mapped on the Maplewood site, and the nearest mapped corridor is at least two miles southeast of the property. THREATENED,ENDANGERED, OR SENSITIVE (TES) SPECIES Database Search Results The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife-Priority Habitat and Species Program (WDFW-PHS) and the Washington Department of Natural Resources-Natural Heritage Program (WDNR-NHP) maintain databases with records of threatened, endangered, and sensitive species of plants and animals or areas of outstanding habitat value. Letters were sent to these agencies requesting information on any threatened, endangered, or sensitive species known to occur in the vicinity of the Maplewood site. The response from WDNR-NHP stated that their database has no information on threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of plants in the vicinity of the Maplewood site. They also have no information on high quality ecosystems in this vicinity. The response from WDFW-PHS included a Priority Habitat Map with accompanying computer data for the Renton quadrangle. This data shows no records of any threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife within one mile of the Maplewood site, and no priority habitats are located on the property. Several wetlands in the May Creek and Cedar River basins are mapped within one mile north, east, and west of the site. Other riparian and natural open space areas are mapped along the Cedar River about one mile south of the Maplewood site. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 5 Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 Based on personal observations, several sensitive wildlife species are likely to be present in habitats available on the Maplewood site. These species include the pileated woodpecker,band-tailed pigeon(Columba fasciata), and Columbian black-tailed deer(Odocoileus hemionus columbianus). Pileated Woodpecker Excavations made by pileated woodpeckers were seen at a few locations on the property. This woodpecker is a candidate for listing as a threatened or endangered species by WDFW. These woodpeckers generally inhabit mature and old-growth forests or second-growth forests with sufficient large snags and fallen trees (Rodrick and Milner, 1991). They are also reported to use open woodlands, parks, and wooded suburbs (Ehrlich et al., 1988) and are regularly seen in those habitats in King County. Pileated woodpeckers usually forage in forests at least 40 years old, feeding primarily on carpenter ants, beetle larvae, and other insects in large snags and stumps. In foraging, they dig large, distinctive excavations in snags or live trees, leaving piles of chips on the ground. During the fall, they will also feed on fruits,nuts, and acorns (Ehrlich et al., 1988). The average home range size on the west side of the Cascades is 1,200 acres, but some studies have found that the density of these woodpeckers increased with the abundance of large conifers and snags (Rodrick and Milner 1988). Pileated woodpeckers excavate nest cavities in snags or large dead branches and usually make a new nest cavity every year. Nest snags are usually greater than 27 inches and taller than 87 feet. Because of the relatively young age of the forest on this site and the scarcity of large snags, the Maplewood property does not provide optimal breeding habitat for pileated woodpeckers, although their foraging excavations are present on the site. After the proposed development, the site will retain trees and snags along the stream corridor and wetlands that will continue to provide foraging habitat for pileated woodpeckers. Band-Tailed Pigeon The band-tailed pigeon is considered a priority species by WDFW because of its status as a game bird. The band-tailed pigeon has recovered after nearly being exterminated in the Pacific Coast states by excessive hunting (Terres, 1980). The band-tailed pigeon is generally found in mixed deciduous- and coniferous-forested areas of western Washington, usually below 1,000 feet in elevation. They feed on a wide variety of berries, nuts, buds, and foliage and in the summer they will also eat a variety of insects (Terres, 1980). They may nest in dispersed pairs or in loose colonies. Nests are usually constructed between 15 and 40 feet above the ground in either conifers or broadleaf trees. A key habitat requirement for band-tailed pigeons is a source of mineral salts, usually a mineral spring. These salts are essential for the production of"crop milk," which is fed to the young (Rodrick and Milner, 1991). To maintain the populations of band-tailed pigeons, WDFW recommends protecting and enhancing mineral springs and other mineral sources. Berry, fruit, and mast-producing trees and shrubs should be maintained by limiting herbicide use throughout the foraging range of these pigeons. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 6 Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 No mineral springs are present on the Maplewood site. The property appears to provide no special habitat requirements for band-tailed pigeons. The variety of trees and berry-producing shrubs will provide seasonal foraging habitat for these pigeons. After the proposed development, the site will still retain a variety of trees and shrubs along the stream corridor and wetlands, which will continue to provide some food resources for band-tailed pigeons. Ornamental trees planted in landscaped areas may also provide additional food resources. Columbian Black-Tailed Deer The black-tailed deer is considered a priority species by WDFW because of its status as a game animal. The subspecies present in western Washington is the Columbian black-tailed deer. The Rocky Mountain mule deer (O. h. hemionus) is found east of the Cascades. The four basic habitat requirements of black-tailed deer are space, food,water, and cover. The average seasonal use area for these deer is about one square mile, depending on the quality of the habitat. Typical winter range in western Washington is on slopes less than 60 degrees and at elevations below 2,200 to 2,700 feet, depending on the severity of the winter weather (Rodrick and Milner, 1991). Typical foraging areas have less than 60 percent combined cover of trees and tall shrubs, and there is a good understory of shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. These conditions are often found in early regeneration stages following a disturbance, such as logging or fire. Deer will feed on a wide variety of woody and herbaceous plants, including grasses, legumes, annual flowering plants, and shrubs (Brown, 1985). In rural or suburban areas, deer can become pests when they feed on garden or ornamental plants. Water is generally available for deer almost anywhere in western Washington. WDFW makes several recommendations for management of black-tailed deer habitat in western Washington (Rodrick and Milner, 1991). A mixture of forage and cover patches should be distributed at the scale of typical deer seasonal range, and the mixture of cover and forage should be maintained over time. The growth of browse species should be encouraged. The open road system should be managed at the minimum feasible levels and densities. These recommendations are primarily intended for forest harvesting and management areas, and do not necessarily apply to residential developments in suburban areas. Black-tailed deer are expected to be relatively common on the Maplewood site, where they could find suitable foraging areas in the shrubby areas. The heavily forested area also provides adequate hiding cover. After the proposed site development, hiding cover and a movement corridor for deer would still be available along the intermittent stream channel and in the wetland areas. Natural foraging areas would be reduced, but black-tailed deer might make use of landscaped areas or gardens. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACTS The proposed development plan for the Maplewood site is subdivision to create 218 lots for construction of single-family residences, as shown on the Preliminary Site Development Plan, Figure 3. A network of new public streets will provide access to all residential lots. One access point to the development is located on 152nd Avenue SE at SE 132nd Street at the eastern edge of the property. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 7 Mr.Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 The other access point is to SE 128th Street via new construction on 148th Avenue SE. SE 132nd Street will be a new arterial across the property to connect with existing streets. The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetland and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Wetlands F, G, and H, the isolated, unregulated wetlands, will be filled for construction of new access streets and the development of building lots. No other wetlands will be impacted for the development of residential lots. Construction of the new street network will require five wetland or stream crossings. One crossing will be located on the narrow intermittent stream between Wetlands B and C. Crossings will be required on Wetlands A and B to allow SE 132nd Street to cross the property. The west end of Wetland E will be impacted by the expansion of 148th Avenue SE. Another crossing over Wetland A will be required to provide access to the southern portion of the site. Where possible, these crossings have been located at narrow parts of the wetlands to minimize impacts. The total area of these impacts is estimated to be approximately 10,150 square feet. In addition to these direct impacts, additional wetland areas adjacent to the road crossings are treated as indirect impacts. The area of indirect impact is taken to be any part of the wetland within 25 feet of the direct impacts. No fill will be placed in these areas, and the vegetation will not be directly disturbed. However, because of the minimum 25-foot buffer requirement (after averaging), these areas represent a buffer between the undisturbed wetland and the areas of direct impact. The total area of indirect wetland impact is approximately 9,200 square feet. In addition to the direct and indirect wetland impacts, development of this site will have some impacts on wetland buffers. Most of the buffer impacts are related to construction of the road network. These road crossings and cul-de-sacs will impact approximately 37,431 square feet of buffers adjacent to the wetlands. An additional 10,538 square feet of buffer will be impacted by lot development. These areas of encroachment are generally small and narrow, with areas ranging from 29 square feet up to 4,485 square feet. During initial site clearing and construction, undetermined numbers of small mammals will likely be killed or injured, while larger or more mobile animals like deer and birds will be displaced to adjacent areas. The survival of displaced animals will depend on whether they are seasonal or permanent residents and on the capacity of adjacent habitats to absorb the additional population. Because of the level of development in the surrounding vicinity, it is likely that most displaced animals will be unable to find suitable unoccupied habitat. The overall carrying capacity of the site for wildlife will be reduced by habitat conversion and removal. Clearing and grading of this site will result in the impacts to approximately 48.34 acres of second-growth deciduous forest, 0.36 acres of forested wetland, and 0.46 acres of moderately-vegetated suburban habitat. After construction, these areas will be replaced by landscaped yards and impervious surfaces, including streets, sidewalks, driveways, and houses. The developed areas will also include park and recreation areas and stormwater detention facilities. The residential landscaping will create patches of ornamental shrubs and trees intermixed with short-grass lawns, leading to a final area of 49.16 acres of moderately-vegetated suburban habitat. The loss of forest habitat will reduce the vegetative structural diversity of the site, leading to a decrease in animal species diversity. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 8 Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 Habitat changes resulting from residential construction will result in the replacement of many native plants and animals with species adapted to disturbance and urban settings. Birds such as European starlings, house sparrows, house finches, and American robins would become more abundant in the residential landscapes. Some species, such as Steller's jay and northern flicker, might continue to use the site, but in smaller numbers. Woodland species, such as red-breasted nuthatch and winter wren would be eliminated from most of the site, but a few individuals might remain in the buffer areas around the forested wetlands. Small mammals, other than moles and house mice, are unlikely to use residential lawns appreciably. If surrounding properties remain undeveloped, coyotes and black-tailed deer could remain in the vicinity. Raccoons, striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and common opossums could forage in gardens and ornamental plants and could become pests with regard to household waste disposed in garbage cans. The proposed density of residential construction and the network of streets will form barriers preventing the free movement of animals across the property. These barriers will fragment the remaining forested habitats on the property and could isolate remaining habitats adjacent to the site. The roads and subsequent traffic in the development will increase the likelihood of animal mortality due to vehicular collisions. However, because of the slow vehicle speeds on residential streets, most wildlife will be able to avoid collisions. Species most susceptible to road mortality are those that are otherwise able to survive in residential neighborhoods, including raccoon, opossum, and eastern gray squirrel. Other aspects of the proposed residential development could have adverse impacts on wildlife and habitats. Fencing of individual lots could further restrict the free movement of many species, although birds and some mammals could easily bypass fences. The use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on lawns, ornamental plants, and gardens will reduce populations of insects and weeds and will lower the quality of foraging habitat for small birds and mammals that feed on insects and weed seeds. Improper use of pesticides could result in direct poisoning of small birds and mammals. Street lighting systems throughout the development will increase the nighttime levels of ambient light. Nocturnal species could be affected by changes in lighting, although many species can adapt to higher light levels. Possible predation by domestic pets could affect small mammals and birds and could limit the habitat suitability of the residential area. CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION Buffer averaging and conceptual mitigation for wetland impacts are discussed in the wetland evaluation report, and will not be included here. Mitigation possibilities for wildlife impacts are limited because of the extent of the proposed development. After development, approximately 49.16 acres of the site will be covered by houses, driveways, streets, landscaped areas, parks, and detention facilities. Approximately 13.57 acres will be preserved in the wetlands and buffers. The largest of these areas are contiguous or separated only by road crossings, thus maintaining a reasonable network of habitats available to wildlife. The largest habitat areas are also contiguous with a large natural area in a King County park adjacent to the southwest corner of the Maplewood site. Project No. T-2798 Page No. 9 • Mr. Ron Hughes April 28, 1999 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Maplewood property includes approximately 62.73 acres located south of SE 128th Street and east of 148th Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington. Most of the property is covered by a second- or third-growth mixed deciduous and coniferous forest. Wetland conditions are present in eight locations on the property. An intermittent stream with associated wetlands crosses the property from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. A smaller, intermittent stream is associated with two other wetland areas, and three other wetlands are present on the site. All wetlands are Class 2 because of their forested vegetation, but three wetlands are unregulated because of their small sizes and isolated conditions. The proposed development plan for the Maplewood site is subdivision to create 218 lots for construction of single-family residences. The proposed site development plan is designed to avoid impacts to wetland and buffers wherever possible, and to minimize impacts that are unavoidable. Construction of the street network will impact intermittent streams or wetlands with crossings in five locations. Buffer averaging will be used to compensate for minor encroachments into buffers to create a reasonable lot layout and for buffer impacts related to road crossings. After completion of the project, approximately 49.16 acres of the site will be occupied by residential development, and approximately 13.57 acres will be preserved in wetlands and buffers. These tracts will retain significant areas of second-growth deciduous forest, forested wetland, and intermittent stream habitats. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. e_ Thomas R. Strong, Ph. Project Scientist TRS:ts Encl: References Figure 1 -Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Vegetation Cover Types Figure 3 - Preliminary Site Development Plan Table 1 - Plant Species Observed On-Site Table 2 -Animal Species Observed Or Expected On-Site Project No. T-2798 Page No. 10 REFERENCES 1. Ehrlich, P.R., D.S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birder's Handbook. Simon and Schuster, Inc. New York. 785 pp. 2. King County. 1987. Wildlife Habitat Profile. King County Open Space Program. Parks, Planning, and Resources Depaitiuent. 3. Rodrick, E. and R. Milner. 1991. Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats and Species. Washington Depai tiiient of Wildlife. Olympia,Washington. 4. Terres, J.K. 1980. The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. Alfred A. Knopf. New York,New York. 1109 pp. 5. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1996. Response to information request from Priority Habitats and Species Program database. 6. Washington Department of Natural Resources. 1996. Response to information request from Natural Heritage Program database. Project No. T-2798 auNJ r.7. . . / 9 1I a "' ••E . bi_ \ •• ' \ SE u a1. y�15- < I'i lvi0 iir^901) • ,. :_. ^,' i E w am ST sa itm: ST ` EREK ' '-' , ' & � amCOAD sr _ SE 112TH ST S �` T 3E < I11N NE 1tn1 ttnl G n .a, DLL NN z a300 Y-'��Y SE'1 S TH `,,{' 15500 sgo�gy! SE 1127H ST SE 114TH ST FS "< - ///aaa MOTH LN n< a L. 1+T�• 1~ SE 4 11 TH Si 3 < a , - �/ 10TH n ST r ro �i s a „„sc.s.A.sco - i 0 .. =1 $ SE 117TH ST N .' SE_ e,N PL 11TH ST Pt SE 118TN ��ST 0 g •' .. I'� 4-'.Wt KPA Ii �sr aa• ;I N 118TH`'`�n C1 '< � 12 - --- _ o R. g ST 4 ,- x NE ent ..,= ST a 1 w I 11 of Ilr .1 ° u - xE 7TH NIra LNE 71N PL 4 ` SE 120TH ST ^I "- < ST „E . SE11215T S7 - < SE_120TH ' NE , ' FEi 122ND COALFIELD -Sr \\glH;e e_ 6�N�6114 Mr ST ...ilk 9dfNlvNt A ST • __ _..__ -Ir PARK ,e !'�P\ ,- M • r 1 Z E � -wh„ ��yy i �1��3,,'t., ,I _SE 124TH ST SE 124TH ®I COA - __ % f5 x SE .� M. Et 4.E .ii.J ---71 SE 12SM ST N it I� S ^e126 H H 1....i rt,M vWi _NE 124TH '� ST 11 s /SL._,'f 4 l sT ` ` 11 9 12 ' '�+ Li° � Z ..< �" , :ii:i:i:::::fi:i:,.: = PARK A s '< ^S 4TH max v Hg SE M RIDE aST SE 128TH ST SE - 128T 2! eI el 8i :xi -ssaa -I STSE IP`TH _ w N+ iTsoo NE 3RD CT ��7 w w �� N I `' er` ®-� • c SE 131ST ST<Ew P ,I< SE 13T1 ST Q 3`C -' S< t zr, `'�, - z SE I34TH^ ST E ',TN r use u ,,,. 14 ` r ®i ST �'� IL, $T I �. SE� PL SE I36TH 1 ST ........... _SE _ 36TH •. - SE 1 , g tE 36M I.50 $ ¢ -- 'h Y1.. TT5400 ^ I7300 ` ST <® I 3°1 ; _ N4 '"''r f `.- 3 II '' SE 1. . 13 ig sE- '. �• i 1---- in ^ .t SE 138TH ST m fts -, s, „I,,,,, ek.NE I:r vt SE 1P36TH 1< i x 138TH PL LIRER N - 6, ^ S tO jr !9M S;sEW[ i'''' 's I sE,S,d,SE 139TH I Lo $ w K. sE 16oni ST : N ta0, I PL g 1 '^ S 139TH PL .. w SE <' 41ST- '% d�J Y,nM -' �1 ..E. 140TH ST I t.an1 n x 3S1 E. SE 141ST gl,7t SEA'" - Y,nn I 5T 8 - L - ' a. $T I Y SE 162N0 $T 1 r K I O a �,`�$ I.., i < _ / 142,,�ST F - S I' SE 142N0 0 SE 142ND ST k ••� 5�/ ! I TE€1`21011 2_l SE I42ND ST A ST Sk L ' N"'�4`i „%/��\ •3. ,! .'�I SE 2I:4iNn 1: �y SI 1.1N Pt 9 SE 143 ` ST Y"4°n 8 r a ,8 ..$E 143. t y+ 144T •A ST.. I ~ .F .114,4TTH� '' .E ^ :. 11 a ''�.' ;r 4' `',v.', 4 - I jI#: ,4'1j'I 5E 14 _ sE 144r54 iY��i�NEaEI� i.��^ ST '1Sp� 69 GOLF .Ty ,,., '•,"` Ntl� s,' < ' P `punaETailEJ _ �1aSE ti1.4111k., / r. . r 2 1 'r ' PL •F, a Y= 6f a EL'� t, *y �,4, ., '^wL sLi e •-Sf .. SE146T` M `k' .,,h { "4 te y. i ,a PL 3- nip i \P`t -�sF/! •'4}'fit,'ate,.... \ j v'+Es -,N,, *SE 11<TH- ~ E 14r 5T.. II$ ^12.12 y. •t3`5 E�' , rE 3 •: ,.',}� 4• r ..', `: r ' ° �S. : 'A's SS w'o� M o-F1 • ,A``4,YFs syP 'i- 'r J" 'ti� rx �ni �✓a! ..0 tag f �%; y ✓ sN _ ...�� f I/A '°T'•.Q. � ^SE 152fD $ M1 14V sE / , c ,c,0 c,_ ..1,_....., ,s ,„,'-1_,T,.•r SM 7 �m nl C1DAR �J RIVER , E t � 6 - -.. -. FR v, O 46M :y f gY M 61 T 1-_ �!*. ;07 f ' ' RENTON MAP s N : . FA I RW00D`. SE 1s6TNE f a i >�. Si ISYIN e _ —5r ,$1$f IGi,x>t :PI i[159��^ _u 159TM_. .PL., ± a SE ILI; , es:160ix�S,' �. Zil 5 I`�.1 PL i "' ,!A 15,- 4 16I5r� 6j /s D P7 X 6M SE 16M , ILIRD �,SE j/ N Y ate'(-7__/4 164TH 7 • ,-,49 a tr_a _ 'T_: S :FATar'.,._ >:I F16,,:.'.h_ s s< tarx Poi pa .. Ref: The Thomas Guide, King County, 1999 Edition, Pages 626, 627. 656. and 657. VICINITY MAP lagoon TERRA Maplewood \��`iseurasASSOCIATES Renton, Washington Environmental Consultants Proj. No. T-2798 Date 11/17/98 Figure 1 -- ___) L - rrr3çf/.T'ffff/9 .. 4e,.. . , ////rei:..:::::i:::.:.:..::: .. ///////y/ ..:.:..,:. / . ••::::. ... . :-:-:•:•: //* . / ./. I/ w////////////// • I I Ip1i'i f I I / APPROXIMATE SCALE Broadleaf Forest . ` W Forested Wetland 200 0 200 400 feet 58.73 acres W 3.54 acres ' 1 1 1 1 1 Moderately—vegetated VEGETATION COVER TYPES I 1 Suburban 0.46 acres -�.-. �� .�� TERRA Maplewood 1 ""• ASSOCIATES Renton, Washington Ref.: Boundary survey by Dodds Engineers, Inc. • ' Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Date 4/28/99 Figure 2 (L I •- a. I I �� _ .-_. 152ND AVE. S.E.' �� - . -- _ I J I -- - - - I/ -- - - - — - _ � � U 129 �+ I � 101 89 W ,25 124 123 122 119 118 117 116 114 \ 73 7 71 70 I 52` 128 113 `\�____.....,,,7 / 68 54 SSIN* i W 127 126 121 120 115 `�� 67 51 A W 1111 68 108 W � 107102 65 130 133 106 100I84 131 13249 109103 MI 64 38440,11° 99 39 41 44 45 W 134 105 1� 78 63 48 37 It 60 98 y 66 79 40 42 43 46 47 62 _ 97 r 36 J + 140 , BO lit 6-! 1 \\\ W W W 98 61 61 01 4100 60 35 W + 95 � 82 W 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 28 25 24 23 22 21 �W W W PARK111111113 20 W 59 I 34 35 36 + , 58 37 ` 19 + \ + 4f‘2 • 57 33 \ W W J1 W W W L 18 \+\ 32Z.,‘ W + W + 56 39 17 + W + 4090 SS 31 30 40 41 42 6 II 1, 7 / \ ___ 8 \ W W '`.o./ - , + W 5D , . . . W "/ 112 18 \�W\ 29 "Alliii:I � `,�� 18 49 9 W W W �\WWW � 11 \ W �,� IWWWW � 10 9 C\\ � I W W � it2 f TO 1 12 13 14 t5 � + W _� 2 3 4 5 \W, + + 6 7 8 I • 23 24 25 ; 4\ 148TH AVE. S.E. I.` W 11 I I I i I I I •' n I I T:\ -17•'�- ›'• 7_ r' APPROXIMATE SCALE 200 0 200 400 feet PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN wellTERRA Maplewood t�� ASSOCIATES Renton, Washington Ref.: Preliminary Site Plan by Dodds Engineers, INc. Environmental Consultants Proj. No.T-2798 Date 4/27/99 Figure 3 TABLE 1 PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE MAPLEWOOD Renton,Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated TREES Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple FACU X Alnus rubra Red alder FAC X X X Arbutus menziesii Madrone UPL X Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood FAC X X Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry FACU X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir FACU X X Pyrus malus Apple X X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X Thuja plicata Western red cedar FAC X X X Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock FACU X SHRUBS Acer circinatum Vine maple FAC X X X Corylus cornuta Hazelnut FACU X X Crataegus douglasii Black hawthorn FAC X X Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom UPL X X Gaultheria shallon Salal FACU X Holodiscus discolor Ocean-spray UPL X Ilex aquifolium English holly UPL X X Mahonia nervosa Cascade Oregon grape UPL X Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum UPL X X X Oplopanax horridum Devil's club FAC X X Rhamnus purshiana Cascara FAC X X Ribes lacustre Prickly currant FAC X X Rosa gymnocarpa Baldhip rose FACU X Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry FACU X X X Rubus laciniatus Evergreen blackberry FACU X Rubus leucodermis Blackcap UPL X Rubus parvorus Thimbleberry FAC X Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry FAC X X X Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry FACU X X X Salix sp. Willow X Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry FACU X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated SHRUBS(Continued) Sorbus aucuparia European mountain ash UPL X Spiraea douglasii Hardhack spirea FACW X X Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry NI X X Vaccinium parvifolium Red huckleberry UPL X X HERBS Agrostis alba Redtop FAC Agrostis tenuis Colonial bentrass FACU X Athyrium filix femina Lady-fern FAC X X Blechnum spicant Deer-fern FAC X Carex canescens Gray sedge FACW X Carex obnupta Slough sedge OBL X Carex sp. Sedge X Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle FACU X Crepis capillaris Smooth hawksbeard FACU X Dactylis glomerata Orchardgrass FACW X Dicentra formosa Bleeding heart FACU X X Digitalis purpurea Foxglove FACU X Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed FACU X Equisetum arvense Field horsetail FAC X X Equisetum telmatiea Giant horsetail FACW X Galium aparine Cleavers FACU X Galium trWorum Bedstraw FACW X Geranium robertianum Robert geranium UPL X X Geum macrophyllum Large-leaved avens FACW X X Graminae spp. Grasses X X Luzula parvora Small-flowered wood- FAC X rush Lysichitum americanum Skunk cabbage OBL X Maianthemum dilatatum False lily-of-the-valley FAC X X Montia sibirica Western springbeauty FAC X Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW X Plantago lanceolata English plantain FAC X X Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass FAC X X Polypodium glycyrrhiza Licorice-fern UPL X Polystichum munitum Sword-fern FACU X X X Pteridium aquilinum Bracken-fern FACU X X Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup FACW X X Solanum dulcamara European bittersweet FAC X Stachys cooleyi Cooley's hedge-nettle FACW X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 1 (Continued) PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Scientific Name Common Name Status 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated HERBS (Continued) Taraxacum officinale Common dandelion FACU X X Tolmiea menziesii Pig-a-back plant FAC X X Trillium ovatum Western trillium FACU X Urtica dioica Stinging nettle FAC X X Vicia americana American vetch FAC X • Wetland Indicator Status: OBL - Obligate wetland species,occur almost always(estimated>99%)under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW - Facultative wetland species,usually occur in wetland(estimated 67%to 99%),but occasionally found in non-wetland. FAC - Facultative species,equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands(estimated 34%to 66%). FACU - Facultative upland species,usually occur in non-wetlands(estimated 67%to 99%)but occasionally found in wetlands(estimated 1 %to 33 %) UPL - Upland species, occur almost always(estimated>99%)under natural conditions in non-wetlands. NI - No indicator status assigned. Project No. T-2798 TABLE 2 ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated AMPHIBIANS Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile X X Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum X X Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa X Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii X W.Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum X Western Toad Bufo boreas X Pacific Chorus Frog Pseudacris regilla X X Red-legged Frog Rana aurora X X REPTILES Northern Alligator Lizard Elgaria coerulea X Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis X X X W.Terrestrial Garter Snake Thamnophis elegans X X Northwestern Garter Snake Thamnophis ordinoides X X BIRDS Mallard Anas platyrhynchos X Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus X X Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperi X Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis X X American Kestrel Falco sparverius Merlin Falco columbarius X Ruffed Grouse * Bonasa umbellus X California Quail Callipepla californica X Killdeer Charadrius vociferus X Glaucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens X Rock Dove Columba livia X Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata X X Common Barn-owl Tyto alba X Western Screech-owl Otus kennicottii X X Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus X X Barred Owl Strix varia X Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus X Common Nighthawk ** Chordeiles minor Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus X X Red-breasted Sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber X Downy Woodpecker * Picoides pubescens X X Hairy Woodpecker Picoides villosus X Northern Flicker * Colaptes auratus X X X Pileated Woodpecker * Dryocopus pileatus X X Western Wood Pewee * Contopus sordidulus X Project No. T-2798 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated BIRDS(Continued) Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii X X Hammond's Flycatcher Empidonax hammondii X Violet-green Swallow ** Tachycineta thalassina N.Rough-winged Swallow ** Stelgidopteryx serripennis Barn Swallow ** Hirundo rustica Steller's Jay * Cyanocitta stelleri X X American Crow * Corvus brachyrhynchos X X X Black-capped Chickadee * Parus atricappilus X X X " Bushtit * Psaltriparus minimus X X Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta canadensis X Brown Creeper Certhia americana X Bewick's Wren * Thryomanes bewickii X X X Winter Wren Troglodytes troglodytes X Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus satrapa X Ruby-crowned Kinglet Regulus calendula X X X Swainson's Thrush * Catharus ustulatus X X American Robin * Turdus migratorius X X X Varied Thrush Ixoreus naevius X X X Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum X X X European Starling * Sturnus vulgaris X X X Solitary Vireo Vireo solitarius X Hutton's Vireo Vireo huttoni X Warbling Vireo Vireo gilvus X Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus X X Orange-crowned Warbler Vermivora celata X X Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia X X Yellow-rumped Warbler Dendroica coronata X X X Black-throated Gray Warbler* Dendroica nigrescens X X McGillivray's Warbler Oporornis tolmiei X X Wilson's Warbler Wilsonia pusilla X X X Western Tanager * Piranga ludoviciana X Black-headed Grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus X X X Rufous-sided Towhee * Pipilo erythrophthalmus X X X Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca X X X Song Sparrow * Melospiza melodia X X X Golden-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla X White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys X Dark-eyed Junco Junco hyemalis X X X Brewer's Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus X Project No. T-2798 I • t • TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated BIRDS(Continued) Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater X X X Purple Finch Carpodacus purpureus X X House Finch * Carpodacus mexicanus X X Pine Siskin Carduelis pinus X X X American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis X X X Evening Grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus X X House Sparrow * Passer domesticus X MAMMALS Common Opossum Didelphis virginiana X Vagrant Shrew Sorex vagrans Dusky Shrew Sorex obscurus X Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsi X X Townsend's Mole * Scapanus townsendi X X Pacific Mole Scapanus orarius X X Little Brown Myotis ** Myotis lucifugus Yuma Myotis ** Myotis yumaensis Long-eared Myotis ** Myotis evotis Long-legged Myotis ** Myotis volans California Myotis ** Myotis californicus Silver-haired Bat ** Lasionycteris noctivagans Big Brown Bat ** Eptesicus fuscus Hoary Bat ** Lasiurus cinereus Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus X Mountain Beaver * Aplodontia rufa X Townsend's Chipmunk Eutamias townsendi X Eastern Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis X Douglas' Squirrel * Tamiasciurus douglasi X Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus X X Bushy-tailed Woodrat Neotoma cinerea X Townsend's Vole Microtus townsendi Oregon Vole Microtus oregoni X Norway Rat Rattus norvegicus X Black Rat Rattus rattus X House Mouse Mus musculus X Pacific Jumping Mouse Zap us trinotatus X Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum X Raccoon * Procyon lotor X X X Short-tailed Weasel Mustela erminea X Project No. T-2798 . . w TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED ON-SITE Maplewood Renton,Washington Common Name Scientific Name 2nd-Gr. Forested Suburban Forest Wetland Moderately- Vegetated MAMMALS(Continued) Long-tailed Weasel Mustela frenata X Spotted Skunk Spilogale putorius Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis X X Coyote * Canis latrans X X Red Fox Vulpes vulpes X Bobcat Lynx rufus X X Black-tailed Deer * Odocoileus hemionus X X Notes: * Species observed on-site, including visual observations,vocalizations, and indirect evidence(tracks,scat, burrows, and nests) ** These species forage aerially for insects over a variety of habitats Project No. T-2798 1111:AUU TITLE INSURANCE CU1yl"1I 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: /t?fl rag u,417 P PR017e T In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FINER HOMES, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION D�CITY OF REN NIING MAY O 5 1999 RECEIVED EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $16.40 Records examined to APRIL 11, 1994 at 8:00 AM CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By1r 4,4;,./44;y0.5:-.2.,,,a„e,„ Volea;(4/114.1›.-.... .....‘,..:. CHRIS JOHANSON Title Officer 628-8377 PUTCRTA/12.5A0/EK ;HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/. ' Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. CHICAGO'ITTLE INSURANCE COMPANY 41, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PIATCRTB/031694/aoc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY d C.AGO TITLE'INSURANCE C0MPA PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: ASSIGNMENT PURPOSE: ACCESS ROAD AREA AFFECTED: WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: MAY 5, 1960 RECORDING NUMBER: 5158814 B 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET OF PARCEL B RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170565 C 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET AND WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170566 D 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1995 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9017-04 LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 326,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $4,456.04 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $4,456.04 AFFECTS: PARCEL A CHICAGO 1111E INSURANCE COMPANY r • • • se: ., • P NATIONAL 6 0 7� '. t,••S y„� apowals sr7teate KO atcpspt MAPS �:f,ip TRW INSUFIANOE e-t tad .. ':� _ • a 1• Hrrtll( 'I H 1 Piled for Recoed at Request at s i i AFTER RECORDING MAIL TOt jir PIKER F#c>rts•4 INC _4 i yf 14150 N.E. 21st Place ►° IUMG Bellevue Wa g8pO7 .►' u�t, . a ; t NO EXUS� TAX coN 7t3-127 i hIAR 9 1983 " • DD is ( 8 "JR*Lair • I t1 TIER GRANTORS JOHN M. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON, husband and wife s ke mod In consideration of Fulfillment of R.:a1 Estate contract A* Island psi& O01r'*7e sad trerrsap r FINER HOMES, INC., a Washington Corporation j e kaserbis dstcrtbsd►sal Walleyes moms,moms,AtsaNd Into Corry e/ KING ' ti The East one-half of the West one-halfot Section 14, Township 23 North, of the Northwest quarter . , ::`? EXCEPT the East one— 5 East, W.H.; • half • of the Northeast quarter of the forthwest quarter of the Northwest quarter; and • EXCEPT the East 30 feet of said premises conveyed to Icing County +_ for road; and EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior '' /. No, 632233. Court Cause S .Sr SUBJECT TO: fir , Easement for water mains as recorded in Auditor's File No. 7507170565. 1 i 1 TMs deed is rives In fulfillment of that certain real •state oostraot batsmen the parties berets, dated JANUARY 5, , 1p 79 , and eoadltlos•d for the ooaveyasc•of the&bore srchas•r la said eoatrac desertb•d property,asd tAe to of warranty borsht cestalsed shall sot a intere t yst or eacssbrasee arising D ply to say title. 1 ,tines\or seder the p cad shall sot ( •u apply to any tares. asasssmeats or other shames tavled, asasearid er b•eoaisa duo sub { to the date of said contract, t teal is tat. taxis* Tax roe paid o• this sal* or sta•p..I .x..gt on January "�11, 1979. a«. •.. • Dated Ode --5*i?cit. day of JANUARY 4979 /9F,3 j •on • d slur ) + STATIC N OF WASHINGTO . :••: Saindon sus. oa + • Enemy a P5exE On tide 4'perilous/7 apparel before nos JOHN M. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON Us sae towers he be the individual dumbed is awl who esecatM the MOAN sad tit tawr 'p°ct lattru d. awl acknowledged INK they Aped uses red purposes term.wa ia.L their het sand voir tart'act sod deed, ter the GZ trdNoddy a y head sr Adel rib '4day of J 4,t ct a•y /9 P 3 ' arm Nwry Pal.*in«r/or rs1 itw of IIosY�b,t, i • i ti/n ,-06-1•v• ),0-wv+--,-.4.l.a..r- �+ -,-swtt ....t` -osre..erNa/re r•-• 'am* ar.wr.... w,�.. • #�',;.- :�r.,.••- ,:.r t+ .44 'di. S-,/.7r I - Transamanoa "4Innrr a * f Tran Ineurar a Compsr+y Ttaf MACE FROVit)LO FOR R[COROaM tt• .- j TRM Insurance Services . 6FILED FOR RECORD AT REOUE$T OP _ 1 a� ila WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO ' g �_ 4,7 ISM a` i Name iaiJ�+3i..( 1)2YYtR4.(�i'I Cr�._............ ......... $ S iAX PAJO ON CONTRACT AFT NO.F LE J //^!ONG CO.RECORDS DiVIStON J Address /�', to - ��/ - - f\C� 1�7, {/J '/c., . �'o 0 7 �v C) Gay,State,Zled .. . -• G"V . 2 co 427101 1 Statutory Warranty Deed ,, ,l v. t��.. , THE GRANTOR RISC BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate and ROY BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate f./ ,S� for and in consideration of $10.00 and other valuable considerations ! in hand paid,conveys and warranta to FINER HOMES, INCORPORATED • f the following described real estate,situated in the Count?d King State of Waahington. i The West half of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.; •'r' `'. EXCEPT that portion thereof of the North 500.00 feet lying East of the ;ax } ->:�•'- '•�' `� East line of the West 30 feet of said subdivision; t 4, , " AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within the East 225.00 feet of tree f •'. .' ; ._4 South 468.00 feet of the North 968.00 feet of said subdivision; 4 ...... 1.? AND EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632253 for S.E. 128th Street. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. < SUBJECT TO: Easement for road under Recording No. 5158814; Right to make �";+;1: i"�::'` necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as ."'•'=' +4,f.' condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233. a .:c ''4 1'•t 'is'•• • This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto,dated March 14, '' C.". .19 78 .and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property,and the covenants of warranty }t}`^_x '-�;f.i herein contained shall not apply to any title,interest or encumbrance arising by,through or under the purchaser in said contract.and • ',rest.V.I.', ,*: shall not apply to any taxes,assessments or other charges levied,assessed or becoming due subsequent to the date of said contract. ! •S Real Estate Sales Tax was paid on this sale on 3 - -o- 7 fl ,Rec.No. `/i i 7 /S' 1 `I `F`•-. , Dated ,,�. ,~1 . March 14 .1978 .1094cr`- 4 Ae.c Sallestrasse q•= STare n 3 ;Conve ante — l,! • tl • ,f 4 ; . > = Q t.;. . t3; 4,„:: e rasse DEP.OF C - • • - } d: t i sEVE t� P&IO?53 { • tt STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE ``.-- '`iw' :t - t.,, I COUNTY OF...Xin i COUNTY OF — t .. g t.•.';1i.•' 19 "•'�i, Or this daypersonally apnrcid before me On this day of ''"`>� ll t dJ711cu] before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- �.•.w*`,;.,, Rex tea es rasse Roy. Ballestrasse ington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared ��5.. s to me known to be the individual described in and t ' ftrti who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and r � h 1 l and acknowledged that they...signed the same to me known to be the President and.. Secretary, " � as the-ir... free and voluntary act and deed. respectively,of .' (or the uses and purposes therein mentioned. the N.rporat.on that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged �' (' the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpor- ■lion,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that '4t ,•i authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal >• .. G; thi VEN under my hand and official seals affixed s the corporate seal of said corporation. �,.. -tL Witness y hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first /7 day of March I9..7.8. m ing at ,Z above written. i ' ,2e �Llr steer, -" �tt;� 1 Notary Pd�lic in and for the tale of Wash- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, � ., resid ...Von,residing AL....Kent 1i tf r• f I 2'. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY O 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 MAP4e warp PnrPeXr Y' Order No.: 423888 Your No.: . Loan No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/11/94 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH FOUR OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: • PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAVE BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: PARAGRAPH NUMBER 8: CHICAGO IrILE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/11.2.90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 Your No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) 1. RIGHTS OF KING COUNTY AND OF THE PUBLIC AS TO A RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, AS DISCLOSED BY THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSOR'S MAP SHOWS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, WE FIND NO DEED TO KING COUNTY FOR SAID PREMISES AND THE CONDEMNATION ACTION HAD UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 DOES NOT INCLUDE SAID, PREMISES. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER SINCE THE PLAT CERTIFICATE DEATED APRIL 11, 1995, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. APRIL 13, 1995 AUTHORIZED BY: CHRISTOPHER W. JOHANSON CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPLCOM2/11-2-90/EK I • `, • ''''' ..2.:..: 1-.E.,.....C'P. ,'..2".1.7.-:T CI,. TK7. :-.:TA-r":.: 01-' -,:A2,H71:0TON E7CoR 2,:ING COUNTY ) Y..':::'...:. CCUNTZ, a ler.r.ai subdivision !, the State of Washington, i NO. 6 3 2 2 3 3 .,N. . .1 Pet: tionor, ) DECREE OF AFFROPRIATION .. -1 ) : ..;1 , :a 73 . ) PA7CEL NOS. 1, 11, IL, 19, 30 i If)1: I 7 .. : ; 'i,,.. I::: .. , ,e-. ., al i 1V, .. , Respon( en .ts ) . , .• , ______ — ..._i .,-, Gn , i.....,s _ t.....„,..; TFIS NATTER having come on duly and reFularly before tl:, :......ult1r5ne rIgd ,....... c for a decree of appropriation pursuant to RC.,1 6.06.05*-pti-oTqlbr ,..•-.- c;› a —, '`-'. ,r 4 . .. , aoneu.r; nf.; bv ChArles O. Car.roll, Prosacutini7, Attorney for Kiriz-.„...';Coucy4.1,-;:i• ,--': ;,-„;;, -- --S throur.h his deputy, Robert Kuvara, and the petitioner having Old ,y.to pro?i.d©d in this j '.57,,,;:- 41 , the roF„istry of the court the compensation pruatmeng;of '-,4, (-0,-.9r17;ation (by the court) entered on March :,:r11.96,-; for parcels #1, ,::, .,\,..,,,,, ,‘,.. .',., 4 ?•,. - . -- t, Pi 3o, the said nircels bein4 ..3.ocried below ORDERED, ADJUZT"..:D„ AND DECREED l'I"nt an ownership interest for „ - . 7.: road rn.zroser as desr-ribed in azhibit "A" attached hereto be, and hereby , appropriated and conveyed to the petitioner in the real property . :_ . ,v.,.... w.iiii$,'..i.;';-•.,7i, , 3-1, B-11, 3-111, 3-10, B-30, attached hereto, . , . •;;7-At.t-;._ ! 17; - . 'vt-i,•.c.; tj c,.;,.. li° \-7?- sitp.ato 4..r. Zinc: County, Washinc.,ton; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AD DECREED that the petitioner 94-04 S ....sy. i and is the ;nor for road purposes n the parcels of real property, is ...4''., entitled to enter into possession o.,.,, and at all times hereafter use and _ . ..,..,..- k.i.-7,04;74 psscs, saic. real property az against all parties known and unknown. :OVA, DON?. IN OPEN COURT this3i.rth day of March 1965. .., • 44<ie ,s,•,,&.-:"%!..7 - " ' ; •'-::'-.7 :',•:.,-.!-7-- ;*Ak• -,.,`M#P.'-.."-- ', - ' • ,--- 4SNe'.!, 1,:.,-...-Y c'4 .V4414' :.,..,Z1.. Tr. „---"'"--)•-• '"--. -Th ,r- .t.t,kt• v,,,„, „ _... / .--:, - 2 ( . . ----:, • r - ._ .2,i,-......-- #101 dUDGE gig fi Is` - qin,,„FT Presentod by: , '-,vSsillti* . ...,,4.... P,'; 20400 / . . . '. .4.4,- . • : . . kt, no E.....1(1. KOVARA . Deputy Prosecuting Attorney ,M0,734.4k, \ ''44111r,, Alfitet 1 0.17 n t.Lc rne y a for pe 4,1 tionor . -,;•.--..,..-,:;,•,-, a':,' ,f aiier,e..„us _ _ IWO .i• 4 iI 't I .i RESOLUTION• NO. 23984 3N z.' ,L IV Wi,REAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ring County have -. property here- determined it to be necessaryacquire the land and - AnZ/.1` na ftel. described for the oublic purpose of county road. rights-of way, to-wit: - S.E.4.7 ! S . . ' Path Street (132nd Ave . to lo8th Ave. S.E. ) tHEREAS, it appears that King County is unable to agree with the owners of said land and property for it's purchase and must resort to conde znat:ion proccodinrs to acquire s'^:e as provided by law, now therefore 11 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington,n, that the Prosecuting Attorney of King County be r and is hereby authorized and direc tod to begin condemnation proceed- Iin s to acquire property and property rir.hts together with rights to s construct and maintain slopes for cuts and fills on certain abutting property on and of the following described property in King County S . E. l228th. Street ( 132nd Ave . S.E. to 168th Ave. S.E. ) 1 A strip of land III;. feet in width, having L.2 feet of such width on each side of the following described. centerline : 4. • Al Beginning at the Northwest corner of Sec. 15, Twp. 23 N.R. 5 E. G.M.. , thence Easterly a distance of 11,727.00 feet to a terminus at a point on the centerline of 168th Ave . S.E. , said point being N. 72°51 '38" East a distance of 32.17 feet from the Northeast corner of the N.W.-4 of the N.W. of Sec. 13, '.TWp �3 N. R. 5 E.N.N. a , PASSED this.13rd day of November �196L. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS `f ` ,E :' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON . xa ATTEST:: .D ;•iU RO ,_.a.._ ROBE,RT• A. IORRI S Chairman Clerk of the Board, 7. SCOTT WALLACE `- ➢Y RALPH.R. ST.END .R Commiesioner t-` Uekuty (.;1t;;na.ss over 4e,l'irt:/k140, • n o cp iv* ' S ' k l' i23' k 7 .a ` j ' , � M '` { i ,,, t _ , 1 . , : n f,e d . , . . . ; • ,,„ • ,I.'41:;°(1.i.t, . • '.....,—,1,./e,i.,.'.' ' . • i I . 4 '1 • , . • Tn., ....,,!.t. .: ,.sr 'J1%, %.;:t. '..; ..)f. ._ ..-:, ,...0.:..k.„1,..:,..,:t .. of ..:,......tin 1% , io.:411:1;hip 23 I :':-):• .:1, ':::.-1:1::;• :.: :.:: :': !.... : ...4-'1' t. 1 ii..-3:' 'n•!,:::; '..• '.... of' tfr...• 1: .‘t•—.. .. .,a•:-. .:: A;•:...: 7.....;••.":::i'."..' 1-2.n..--.. I.;a s t 10 f 0 t o f said ' - • -'''• - "—"•• •• .•-, ; "••••• C^,,-" ''''C.".. 1:0",: ';''7"; -7 •-(7,7••:-"? r.otzrt•,- lioz.v1; situate I in t-.1...c. C.:.,!..In'..'y ,...)?..• ....in;-., :-...,tati2 of i .I • . • .. .._ • . • • . . • I • - • l'nx: ; . L.: . , Audi or't a 1."i le #3111.500 & A #331;sib 01 -.4 •••4i -.] john 11. Swindon and Agnez Saindon, hi wife. 1 1 e &:- Audi to r':.-, Fi le 4'33,•;l...c.,00 , #3311130]. :1 • • • 1 ;:-,4 • • • • • ., .. , • • . .,7.1 .4::, • . . . ., . . • . - . . -,,,, • . • ... . . •. ;.. • A,, • . • ;f4r , • :30 . .. . ft? . . . . • • . . . - -'1 • . — ,..., ,. . . .it.L1 . • • 11 • '',...T., TV ii, . • • • ' • ,,,..i., • . . y,...-,. . * . 4.L . . _.... !it A . • . Exhibit -F- 30 -. . -:. _ , ,. ---.:,•• , '. •,,-; : ' : • • • , . , , . . .. . ‘ _. . .., . KING GOtiN'I'Y, too legal subdivision or the :“.ate of Washington, ) ) NO. 3 3 2 2 3 3 Petitioner, ) DECREE OF APPROPRIATION vs . ) PARCEL NO. 28 APTEX, ::NC. , et al, ) cri Respondents . ) 7;71 rv-" TILS MATTER having come on duly and regularly before t3 -ut r r.ed n:7 O ,judge for a decree of appropriation pursuant to RCW 8.08.Oo0 T?x•e tiro r appearing by Charles O. Carroll.. Prosecuting Attorney for Kit ,Cc ity, through his deputy, Robert Kuvari, and the petitioner having paidnto the registry of the court the compensation provided in thin judgment y.'Ke t%e t upon e.6kmtAisa entered on March 23 . 1965 for parcel #/28, the said parcel being driscribed below NOW, 't'itEiiisPi3ttE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that an ownership interest for road purposes as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto be, and hereby is , appropriated and conveyed to the petitioner in the real property described in Exhibit "B-28", attached hereto, situt;e in King County, Washington; and IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petitioner is the owner for road purposes in the parcels of real property, and is entitled to enter into possession of, and at all times hereafter use and nossesQ, Said .realtiyproperty as against all ,partios known and unknown. DOM': IN OF'EN COURT this3 th day oC March 1965. •- U ii cx Prosontod by: t? i % t.l ItI TAIill. Doput y Pi,^o:I( cutirit; At:tornn f 0r nt tornoy:; ' for pe ti tioner „,!. . Yy. tw' � Ai:i '•11 i, the Board of County V�r'r .:.,:.:' Zt��':i �:. ��l�i�' County have 5� _J determined .1. t to be necessary r to acci r i ro the land and property here- * Lnal tor described for thepublicpurpose 1, county t, }� I` i. e o i road rights-of- Iii:Ali way, to-wit : ., - % tt tJi ( .1 3. ) 1� � .. t.r•t:t+ t: ,t;,a Ave .n4t, , . :.. t.o z:��3r.ti i,v„ . :> 1 .l',iltiiiEASit appears •� t; �•' r e:a;•:, that Ii'i l County :i_ unable t•? tr�;roe, with :S4'S the owners of said a.:and and p roper•t;, t'or• it 's purchase and must rosort ',-.'' t.o t_`" ttdenrint.i'u pvocctitditT1,,: to acquire :,l!h'.io an provided by law, now r�`'x H t hove rove % BE IT RESOLVED by the i3aard of County Commissioners of King County, ';'ash:i.ngton, that the Prosecuting Attorney of K'ing County be and is hereby authorised and d.iroctod to begin condemnation proceed- :1 T .i.nl;:, to acquire property and property r.'.i rhts together with rights to ,, con::truet and n:ii,nt;nin :;lo e for cuts, andfills on certain abutting ; property on and or the following do:scribed property in King County S. E . 128th Street ( 132nd Ave . S.E. to 1' 3th Ave . S.E. ) ;44, A strip of land 34. foot in width, having 142 foot of such width on each ;ido of the following described centerline : )ir Beg .nning at the Northwest corner of Sec . 15, Twp. 23 N.R. S E..id.M. , thence Easterly a distance of 11,727.00 feet to . a terminus at a point on the centerline of 168th Ave . S.E. , .1'y said point being N. 72°S1 ' ,8” East a distance of 32.17 feet 4 from the Northeast corner of the N.:•l).i of the N.W.1/4 of Sec. 13, Twp. 23 N. R . 5 E.I.M. t, PASSED this 23rd day of November 196L . BOARD OF COUNTY COM'iISSIONERS ' ' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • xY ATTEST: ' ItOrsI�R7t ED Iiliidl30 )frp A. i'IORR.:S Chairman a Clor'k of the Board k , "`' SCOTT WALLACE '"`; BY RALPEI R. ST :NDEIi Commissioner 4,' • Deputy JOI'N T. 0'BRIETi Commissioner .1 •'i Description `Y The North 500 feet of the 'Test ''z of the •'if..st ';: of the Northwest ':; of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East :J.i•i. ; EXCEPT the East 225 > feet, EXCEPT the 'Jest 30 feet; AND EXCEPT County Road; situate in the ; : County of King, State of '••'ashington. yip . • i:els Swanson and Gladys Swanson, ,r.; his wife Owners Auditor ' s File rL.585538 'dater Dist:_,ict No. 90, Utilities - Local Improvement District No . 2 M u ID Assessment No. 2 WI klit 34. Pk _..J ..... ,f,„,„, _ _ ___ • . , -,1: d9 x Exhibit .3-28 r t ; h ^,.�dr -: yi P, t° S5 N't i �'df 1 r.[4 k Y u++ k r : ,n.o: ti ,4 t:,74 4 ,,,, w r h, W r i r t{.. i{ o 1, t 0,y4 S { y t ,^ s b 1 h-!# S k�k r .t y rt ar � s t +l'qy! ss, T � 1 �d �i'i,� �t 5^��' F 1 5 K r�; 0 rLLi V; , � i�f1 . v" 01,-1i~.A i ^�0 If f ' - jtil { y t4i2f 4i,,..• 0r i • ' 'S?1UT'� Y�f"'S01 114'1'• eF 16;fA,yt 4P '''t- .. �•"#_ ��.rr31'� �' 't7 r t•' r �,r t rm'yd�. ar w,� � r;'t�'n 5 t �Cw . '.j..9 .f M� a xp�•.,.k. , 5 �V r i," 4 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY O 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 423888 Your No.: MAPLEWOOD Loan No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #2 ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 2 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/11/94 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 7 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175, AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR THE CEDAR RIVER TO LAKE SAMMAMISH TRAIL PROJECT. SAID ORDINANCE IS ATTACHED TO A NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9409060421. ALTHOUGH THE LIS PENDENS DOES NOT NAME FINER HOMES, INC. OR BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. AS A RESPONDENT, THE ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN SAID LIS PENDENS IS THAT OF THE ORDINANCE, WHICH DOES DESCRIBE THE REAL ESTATE UNDER SEARCH AS WELL AS OTHER PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS NOT SUBJECT TO CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175 IMPLIES THAT SAID PREMISES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT A LATER DATE. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER SINCE SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1, DATED APRIL 13, 1995, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. APRIL 18, 1995 AUTHORIZED BY: CHRISTOPHER W. JOHANSON CHICAGO I rI LE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/11-2-90/EK • O CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 423888 YOUR NO: MAPLEWOOD UNIT NO: 10 LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT AC ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 OF THE SECOND CERTIFICATE SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 02/24/99 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: AD THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE FEBRUARY 24, 1999, DATE OF THE SECOND CERTIFICATE. AZ APRIL 23, 1999 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS A? NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION RON HUGHES 1/1 DODDS ENGINEERING KEVIN 1/1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/RDA/0399 c11LJ-t.J kJ 111 Li 11,1J U 1Jt1N k-rJ l.,jivirli 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SECOND CERTIFICATE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: MAPLELEAF In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FINER HOMES, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $2 0 0.0 0 TAX: $16 .4 0 Records examined to FEBRUARY 24, 1999 at 8:00 AM CI-ICAGO 11 I'LE INSURANCE COMPANY By J MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 PIATCRTA/12-5-90/EK 111\_.l1VV 111 L1L 1110 llIJ .L' .1'i l..VlV1I t' • Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968 .00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 . CHICAGO 111 LE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PLATCRTB/031694/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: ASSIGNMENT PURPOSE: ACCESS ROAD AREA AFFECTED: WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: MAY 5, 1960 RECORDING NUMBER: 5158814 • 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET OF PARCEL B RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170565 c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET AND WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170566 O 4 . TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9606210966, REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND CONNECTION CHARGES THERETO. ✓ 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9017-04 LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 371, 000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 4, 990.24 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 4,990.24 AFFECTS: PARCEL A w 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9005-08 ' LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 273,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,673 .42 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,673 .42 AFFECTS: A SOUTHERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SAID TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER FAILS TO EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET. x 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9004-09 LEVY CODE: 6867 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 242,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,483 .95 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,483 .95 AFFECTS: THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SAID TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER FAILS TO EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET. CHICAGO 111LE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPP PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) AA 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175, AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR THE CEDAR RIVER TO LAKE SAMMAMISH TRAIL PROJECT. SAID ORDINANCE IS ATTACHED TO A NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9409060421. ALTHOUGH THE LIS PENDENS DOES NOT NAME FINER HOMES, INC. OR BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. AS A RESPONDENT, THE ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN SAID LIS PENDENS IS THAT OF THE ORDINANCE, WHICH DOES DESCRIBE THE REAL ESTATE UNDER SEARCH AS WELL AS OTHER PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS NOT SUBJECT TO CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175 IMPLIES THAT SAID PREMISES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT A LATER DATE. rr 9. RIGHTS OF KING COUNTY AND OF THE PUBLIC AS TO A RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, AS DISCLOSED BY THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSOR'S MAP SHOWS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, WE FIND NO DEED TO KING COUNTY FOR SAID PREMISES AND THE CONDEMNATION ACTION HAD UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 DOES NOT INCLUDE SAID PREMISES. z 10. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9506199001, AS FOLLOWS: A. ENCROACHMENT OF A CHAIN LINK FENCE AND A BARB WIRE FENCE, APPURTENANT TO PARCEL B INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH ST. B. ENCROACHMENT OF A HOG WIRE/BARB WIRE FENCE, APPURTENANT TO A NORTHERLY ADJOINER, ONTO A NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A. C. ENCROACHMENT OF A BARB WIRE FENCE, OWNERSHIP UNDETERMINED, ONTO A NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A. As NOTE NUMBER: 1 THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PTN W 1/2, NW 1/4, 14-23-5. END OF SCHEDULE B CHICAGO 1TILE INSURANCE COMPANY © CHICAGO '1'1'1'LE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. 'T1 1 )ti3Of S.C. 2BTK SL " —23— • 1• • .`. ..••.. • • .. c • • • • N J— C:I r.. .. • I . I I • 14 • to n CAI!1 ire,+: ... - ... . - PIONEER NAT1oNAl to 7.7 - TITLE MfsuR/ owert•1...aaHrMD rpm kC0•DIYS VS/. i.::i""f; • } i Tiled for avrrfn Cyr 1{ b: , Record at Request of ? Ort ' » V ,1C AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO1 k FINER HOMES, INC. 4 r+:r, 14150 N.E. 21st Placer Bellevue Wa 98007 ;r t NO EXGAX 78-127 A1,4R 9 t983 '4, 3.4 } 3 x DD j y �t y hilt c} s�tyy fi�ery (�y�'��3 63 '�`N r r •gY Y lbtV d �..r+�s'.J<.� >,1 fie' ,�vr�x`� + * r PtOttk(L6i1� s;a 11 2 et" R , fi,` 5 i'. , • e II ap • 1� THE GRAIdfORS JOHN M. SAINDON MD AGNES SAINDON, husband an d rod wife ,,'" - brand In wsaidwatioa d Fulfillment of R,:a1 Estate contract .fay "'WI'''. is head paid,eowreye sad ogresses Is FINER , a Washington I • . HOMES, INC., ng Corporation f • §:It` the toaner*described real nuts,situated la the Cant • : agiiaGta: )d KING .alto d The East one-half of the West one-half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W,M,; i° • • EXCEPT the East one-half of the Northeast quarter of the northwest :44 quarter of the Northwest quarter; and EXCEPT the East 30 feet of said premises conveyed to King County r _..._ t if for road; and et • 'v ♦k EXCEPT that portion condemned in KingCounty' No. 632233. Superior Court Cause ```yyy SUBJECT TO: Easement for water mains as recorded in Auditor's File No. 7507170565. t 'Ibis deed la given In fulfillment of that certain nal *state contract between the parties hereto, I dated JANUARY 5, , la 79 , and coaditloned for the coaysyance of the stove • described property,aid the covenaata of warraaty heroin ccatalaed *ball not applyS ? to u all sot x e interest or encumbrance arising by,through or under the purchaser la said contract, and *ball not apply to any taxes, meats or other charges levied, asasssod or beeomlag due subsegeeat , to the data of said contract, u £ gut xa Cate else Tax we paid on this sale or .cam ,....opt coo January '..T 11, 1979. Rao. So. Dated this -5th i?tit. day of JANUARY 9 /9r3 — -- g uns, - .4i,L,1'9 u , h r, . .on •yi •:e, SaindonAid � STATE OF WASHIAICTON, I Comity of t yia?ce On We day persoaaby appeared Wore me JOINM. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON i to me known to be tit* htd es e irdeal described la and who aceted tie wltiia sod foregoing hWsa.eett, and t seesack n otes th awns seeeelenee al� � gaol tie•seer altheir free and roleatary act mad deal for the , GIVE en N der my hand gad'Akio)meal Ws c t day,d , /9 3 Nair, ?eM C 1a*ad'or ,Execs N Waegea, R ►e/"_ elilag et • a1, "RMt4 .„,,,, ix+,,,,„,x' ::.�sligg.".awi + ;;,sew viw,!m"^R•'Argror..sr.ir.a ,b�;ti ., by y ' (,ncZ as.a.* its 4...•-%IL d .a!'7s, �• `f.yLi S ' Trantwnar'oa 1! , Itle In$U$tCa CompanY THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR Reamers owl T Title Irisurance Services PLED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF 13 • - ��a WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO f.; 1- .$ Name -. -��0/ >^/-- SAYS • T PAIO ON CONTRACT AFF N0. �Z 1�S e p ,�/ KING CO-RECORDS DIVISION , y Address / 2 to - die - i "' A IP007 , p car,sin.,zip / C�/ ..... — + '� CO 427101 Statutory Warranty Deed s rdi�r r THE GRANTOR REX BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate >1'% :ir and ROY BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate fe' iq - for and in consideration of $10.00 and other valuable considerations • in hard paid,conveys and warrants to FINER HOMES, INCORPORATED the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of Washington: The West half of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.; =rf EXCEPT that portion thereof of the North 500.00 feet lying East of the v r East line of the West 30 feet of said subdivision; ▪ ` '�' ' ` AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within the East 225.00 feet of t} e ,?•, a f South 468.00 feet of the North 968.00 feet of said subdivision; b.SSG G r.'~ AND EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court ''.'°"'' •'-'•' �''' ' Cause No. 632263 for S.E. 128th Street. a1 / *}s Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. W..-,.` , -:1 SUBJECT TO: Easement for road under Recording No. 5158814; Right to make ; j, *Ic- necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as ' +. 1 condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233. Y ,.' l'?' -, six. . This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto,dated March 14, i. Y-qI t� .1978 ,and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property,and the covenants of warranty ,'tsw"',,r,,4$. herein contained shall not apply to any title,interest or encumbrance arising by,through or under the purchaser in said contract,and ;;x., r 4,, shall not apply to any taxes,assessments or other charges levied,assessed or becoming due subsequent to the date of said contract } ,$ #1.1 t, Real Estate Sales Tax was paid on this sale on 3 - o-7$' ,Rec.No. y i.S V/S . ?-40' s t Dated March 14 ,1978_ • t • X '. 'Re�26Ba .lestrasse q' ,Tim°F Conveyance •_'-� i1. x ((, { 1 3 ° `` a v _r as1!( , _ ,r'; '=r-Tub=T tl i1 ,- k';:,,:,i,-K,p ...i,.,.„ ,'‘... ?i§;fg? 1 e rasse .o DEPr o► ,aa'�.J, i-:._. -, 1EVENUE I P&lo 119' . . - _ii STATE OF WASHINGTON ) STATE, •i I.: , tr N1 i..- 1�. .. _t,t_ • r tTL Jqx J} sT e.- fsl ' COUNTY OF...King COUNTY OF..._.._.._ _ _ ) I s' x Rex Or.this ap eargd before me On this day of pan 19 before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- x4 :. D s Sir• Roy-Balle.strasse ington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared r iy. to me known to be the individual described in and }xjr V v who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and..._._.._-. ., . x y: s ,�. .... r ) 1- tp �,+r and acknowledged that they...signed the same to me known to be the President and... ....__...._.......Secretary, r;. y'7 as.....their...free and voluntary act and deed. respectively,of ..�� for the uses and purposes therein mentioned the .':rporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged 1 '+?j2 the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpor- .-r �x ation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that .^-1 a authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal t G1,VEN under my hand and official seal this affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. /7{r(day of March ,19..78. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first • 1 •. above written. y� r:..N,LGrt .:'i Notary PY1Alic in and for the tale of Wash- _ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, 71, • . 1 `. ;..gton,residing at....Kent residing at -•-•--- s k. ,'''i, r r ;: i Y� �`". Tom No.W-sel It...brs •..d •.S •. - ,.. - ,4 '.r. il A . j 411.�.�r�(., 1 +F,�w.; 5{....,, f "; ^, ., "�^trw ,�fi�-.�M-_ .1. - -, �( 7Q . i IY h I. r;Q i �557 -• `'�n 1 -;g. xe i,-k OL 1.75 Faa4 /v , �� ■ r - rT"it 3333'' ',,y. r i,:.".,••a� ��p <r �' .•'miff $�,5+,,,y i•i' .<' ill .•. •::.'i,',•.::_'.,-45:-., ;:.,,...,c,„...7-49.ateei,•,,*'•44,0),,.....174.4--4i,4...v •,-:-!,,t .'11!, •- t. •• t •74 .4 a r [.q s it J.yfX�',..,,�'>I .... • . ' 't' �. • •;a-101aidastea gory .14 tom` '.K•,k.�: s-, a ,! •Mleh tee eerteratiess, sand 7J the asld?*•Cr.YLii i. s` r ter and 1a.oeasidarati. of L beeehy atkahrieddrd. and of ►t other Beet aid :, 1 sal severally assign and tranafa* ;: s'Ai� V' i s. A Os, and WILLIS 'VOAS. EA*TEL, ►.• , all et', 3s rights and inter- . -r- ;• } eats in and hiss 1hrf .s, •a rise dated Anse 13, 1956, b7 and bo- . .;I tween PUS? ims211110.00NPAT, Lesser, gat IIMULLAILN EROADCAS?Dt C O1P �A?D , anvil't►itLL C!l'aits`: no., and aims I. .sAIDSR, ' . Lessees, eewsias tl» lislaslti� lMts'Z1ed real "estate s ituat a in King Gelbsb7. Wa ' !de �ert�a 1�t st salt (Y of the Sanih- west Quarter (M 'it Ntries')4, i t3 North, Rang. ' S s.Y.L loss the teat 30 seat deeded to Xing County, Wash- (- " • `; ington, for toad, . • TOOITS with as easensat over gad woes the West 30 feat of the Northwest geaste, (tilt) for said aootion 11 fo 5' <- access road. WAITER N. WEILL X. ANDERSON, and WILLIS S. EASTEL, d/b/a 3ZA?TII INEIOiSasa, aesept the aforesaid assignment .' ..`, and transfer and agree to assert and perform the obligations of rraxLAXs B1OIDCASTSm OORPORA!XON, SEATTLE SI►IYAL QINTEX, IIC. , , and RAM J. SAI.D= under said Lease arising or asoruing on and after the of f sot ire data of this instrument. ,; ; The undersigned ass �na� IITTiIT s of that oertain Lease dated ;"~ •4 June 13, 1956 b77 and between IISS? CCMO:AIT, Lessor, 1.'' , >s and IIT3SI*XI BROADCASMX) COZTOSATIOI, SEATTLE SIYIVAL CIDRSR, ;_ .. . '` • INC. and RALTH J. SAVER, Lessees, do hereby as SUMO the foregoing " . • • Assignment in a000rdanse with its terms and here agree that no • further assignment of said Lease shall be made without the consent ..4. of Lessor. ' t. h This Instrument shall speak and be effective as of the •-$. date it ie delivered to the said WALTER W. EELSXOO, DARRELL R. -!m AXDERSON, and WILL IS R. BARTEL, d/b/a SEATTLE M7SICABTERS. wx II WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid assignors have executed ' �" r ti'' this instrument this 7c�day of Decker, 1958. t'•`;` IJT$RLkU , OA DCAS�IQ CORTORATIOl ! a s / ATTEST: py/_ � 41 / -\7 ' > Secretary rr^` . .. ' -1- +�•' - 1• ,<,2, i !' ' ' _ '' ' • .�4 _ ;p[.`y .` .'R/y irk'_�.�s .!Eae1.i r$3 i'.t«! �,, tl , q ,� .�✓r �' ,, y t .i c40 AY, , A.Lr.� A, `4 .L re m t F f R g � i^e,zLi <S1Y'' J P W r a�• ' ".-'•tvx ,c '�d,S �;y� �fs� lasT'i� f (+2f5 i� '` S �' t t �;j moo'} Rr$;o7 r5F 'ik 31a $', w, _ "��gg`�_ ` 9 �f �tr".-'Eki, ,•y }r a �r y 1= +, x a # f c x , ` '' i=ta,4 4');. yJ{max a' r l 3 ,`4�'iitei' a ,-. `�' .�,LS s .ery;r , ,* s 413.i '�7jtAil ✓✓A�y7 - F r , Y''' • Y r• . ' • i • • f.• .1: ,..;s,,Y}'' -'+.(- s' :i.t`:i4.4 y#G3G+•.74 _.y e it,-• I. w.. / . ice-�/i, • • '. �! AT��I!! a tolie aturesal4 assign- - neat and ti afsi " ut Ml1d! I. 20d D.III�LL `3 I- I R. , Li', `/A has ' all is of . •• • . ., nano' %111lLi oily • Zi0. taet L?.Fi 1; its Ingo, ZM +r1�►- et to the soptids at Y et sststi3 tssttt !�t lasMd�l1�' ,:�>�[s S) thereof. i' It is t t�asd that ,1r #�!a ► the Lessor does net rslii re Le1a�it !Wit 1W . real t�iMM• 'rate orfirallirtoiliturt a �4 a ea a ; IX YIT1B35 WHIRE07, the aforesaid assignee has executed .' 4n. .:04_ this lnstrurarnt this ,j 'day al' Deer, 1958. 17t) C(.4;164j1L(• l' --2 ,,,_e;e6,,' A 2c.,e )(:-., r I. 7a t111.1,12e I it.; STATE Op Wannn10Tc ) •i % so. COUNTY oy XING On thin '?� day of I?eNtsber, 1958, before ae, the undersigned, a Notary Puolio in and for the State of Washington, duly aaezaiasioned • and sworn, personally appeared RALPH J. �Rc I.�., and DA.RI.�[a sANDb�t, to me kaown to be the President and Seor.tar,, reapsatively, of IYTEIR- ' _ LA.X.E BROADCASTING OORTORATIOH, the corporation that ozeouted the fore- ,F going instrument, an' aoknoarledged the said instrument to be the free " ,�` • and voluntary hot and deed of said corporation for the nsec and pur- �' ` Doses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized � F to eaeout• the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the oor- ¢ sy2 porate coal of ea id corporation. ^.,� *'s€r "` ` dI E..3. my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day '` nd. Thar in thin nertifioat• above written.. . a; :� kri. /] / �,.y„ .,Sze; �I` CAttf'mac in and far the .;gale ,1X .� K.'.. r -2- of Washington, residing, at Seattle •} y9�` �,� ; f , + 1c4t li tiM '.0 4.l.,vim rl ., 4, y" , � C� fMs the unde• r- . a tI • Shad et" . 7 la�als ' • y +speared SAS J , Tit. 1 .. and r` .. j,7. ��}^ 1, yea,,.hrNtyft3 sag" sasistary -- �' + sj .-'�� •Y'tr. ",+F.�e�`4^ sPygv• �...a PY .�I + i that ° ?,, !mod inatru- tr as : ! ties ,�.,. „,� a s+i l , des 'oath ata"red that 4,, that the seal af- • °y;,,,A s, -4. • q brad ;ellisial seal baits ettLied the day • <` ` .�,y leis aa711ti % It wittea, j 'i^`•`' ' fir the Mate Y 't f,•' 1 ) Of Was�hiagtae, residing at Seattle. • I us. COMFY! Or KIld Oa this `day of Dese ber, 1,58, before me, the under- aigned, a Istazy 1 la mg for th State Oi Wanhin�ten, duly acendssios»d.a�ed sways, personally appeared ZAi1H I. s1,JDt*, JR., ° to ue know* to 1e tie sioseltter ot the SWATS C11 RACY: J. S►YDSB, DECYASRfl the indiridne3. tie szsealed this foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said inetremene to bb,the free-end rolantary act and deed of said eseparatid a teo► the adet Oat purposes therein nen- tioaed, end on oath stated that he vu authorised as rush Rxeeutor to execute the said instrument. ,:, • ' WI1BES s y hand and otitis sal seal hereto affixed the day z +}Y vitas in this seriifisate aQo�s written. ' T4 -` 7 e wit, • • of Washington, residing at Seattle. trill Or YA3$D(GTOJ ) COUNTY Op XINO ; s s• t On this .)(' day of December 1958, before me, the under- ;>�.:, a igned, a Notary PuTo in and for the, State of Washington, duly k ' c anal'a1oned nd sworn, personally appeared ALBBRT S. BAT,,CU and 4 , to no lmolia to be the President and Z., /._ c : . ^eor�tary, reap•o�Tely, of FIRST ZYYBSS�? COMPANY, the corpora- • ,��; ••• tion that ex*outed the foregoing Ina tzument, and act know ladged the ,r instrument • said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said K""' corporation for the uses end purposes therein mentioned, and onz, oath stated that they were autharissZ1 to sxecute the said instru- Y assnt and that the seal affixed is the aorporate real of said o or- mrt • poration. • WIT'RB3s ay hand and official seal hereto affixed the day rY11z ,, Tear in thin certificate above written. »d, AOTAXY t C in and r E . State ;' �, of Washington, residing at Seattle. '�' • .. - ••,* .• ru.d iM kecc• sr L-b. 4; /•- "x-�,u�, /� ady: RA -3r. ROBERT A MORPr'.. County Auc- , q" r • 3r ' 1 . • �t•,• - y ELIEtiEtil 7 1 THIS AGREEMENT made this day of .JC'L Y y 19 1.(, by and between ..!a I-114 AA, Soet ( Ni DOl\-1 and AGE 614,JJ DOA/ , his wife, hereinafter called "Grantors", and King County Water District No. 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, -O hereinafter called "Grantee." CD WITNESSETH: i 4 CDThat said Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, do(es) by al these presents grant, bargin. sell, convey and confirm unto the r- said Grantee, its successors, or assigns, a right-of-way or ease- ment for Water atielliaMlis. Mains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the fol'.owing described property situated in King County, Washington, particularly described as follows: j A PERMANENT EASEMENT described. as 'tYie Southerly 30 feel of the E1/2 of the SWiy of the NIA of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. . less County Road. ALSO A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT described as the Southerly 40 feet of the Ell of the SW1 of the NWt of said Section 14. less County Road. Any tree larger than I Dinches in diameter shall be logged and saved for the • Grantors use. The said tree may be staked at the Grantors property. FILED for Record zt Request of- -Name Address C*0 . i• C`i � G_-__ ti Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until such time as the said utilities have • been accepted for operation and maintenance by King County Water District No. 90, but not later than December 31, 1976. Record Owners John Saindon Easement No. 14-23-5-2 • 10708 A Street Tacoma, Washington 98444 - _—tea.- � -.—_ - I i That said Grantee shall have the right without prior institution • of any suit or proceeding at law, at times as may be necessary, to enter upon said property for the purpose "Of' constructing, repairing, altering, or reconstructing said Water esomOWAms Main, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or lia- bility therefor; provided that such constructing, repairing, altering or reconstructing of said Water or Sewer Main shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in this right-of-way shall not be disturbed or destroyed, or in the event they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered u) upon by the Grantee. ,43 The Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of said r- easement, so long as said use does not interfere with the installa- tion and maintenance of the Water tan►-Main and so long as no r- permanent buildings or structures are erected on said easement. This easement shall be a covenant running .with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs, and assigns of both parties hereto. /� 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON) , ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) I, the undersigned, a notary public in and„for the State of Was on, hereby certify that on this day of 1 � ��{ _, 19 %. , personally appeared before me ,`I Q 6 t , , I;1a fjN l� and f )•.i£S S 1 Mc I to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ..,- 7 • a , • N t y Pu lic in a • 'd State of Washingto • 4/at• itecar e.r's Note: Notarial seal on the reverse al de. I FILED for Record at Request of r. ZA Filed at request of: o N HOLM KELI.OGG P.S, o'. 1002 S i.a� ;1 I,v BGS 90) RENTON, WASHR.GIGN 98053 trl O k O ii z Ftd Li •nr SUSI f 1S31103a---- 030033t1 tA io 0 i i . ...• ..-_...::, -. 4 ` 4 I i .; t 1. `f E. A5. E. t1E. IiI I t i Ma THIS AGREEMENT made this 20th day of y 19 75_, by and between Rex Ballestrasse and Roy Ballestrasse . hereinafter called "Grantors", and King County Water District No. 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, 1 1 ' o hereinafter called "Grantee." t CD WITNESSETH:h f N- That said Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, do(es) by CD these presents grant, bargin, sell, convey and confirm unto the said Grantee, its,buccessors, or assigns, a right-of-way or ease- , ment for Water an -+ter Mains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property situated in King County, Washington, particularly described as follows: n PEP,Mt•NENT EASEMENT described as the Westerly 30 feet of the W1/2 of the Wls of the NW of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. . less County Road. ALSO A PERMANENT EASEMENT described as the Southerly 30 feet of the 1 W1 of the W% of the NW't of said Section 14. f f . ALSO A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT described as the Southerly 40 feet of the W1 of the W1 of the NWk of said Section 14. An tree above 8" in diameter to be saved, stacked in various places on the Grantors property for his use. FILED for Record at Request of • • Nome . Address Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until such time as the said utilities have been accepted for operation and maintena a by King County Water District No. 90, but not later than 1�/J I, /976 Record Owners Rex and Roy Ballestrasse Easement No. 14-23-5-1 201 S. W. 12th Street Renton, Washington 98055 ti. i, l That said Grantee shall have the right ,wixhout prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at times es' may be necessary, to : enter upon said property for the purpose of constructing, repairing, altering, or reconstructing said Water or Sewer Main, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or r lia- bility therefor; provided that suc nstructing, repairing, altering $ or reconstructing of said Water Main shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in this right-of-way shall not be disturbed or destroyed, or in the event -, they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good a jcondition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. } CD CDThe Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of said � easement, so long as said use does not interfere with the installa- • tion and maintenance of the Water and Sewer Main and so long as no permanent buildings or structures are erected on said easement. This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs, and assigns of both parties hereto. it iii.V",.....4---a---' . • e STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the of • of Washington, hereby certify that on this 20thday May • • 1975 , personally appeared before me • _ Pay RallpstrascP and Rex Ballestrasse , to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the same as their free and voluntary act And deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Ra40V/Charssiks-40/—) s Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at . _ ,: .. _ I 1, ..°, . . ' S•y.( '� rr, )• • • • 4. • • O O t'1 RECORDED OF a _REQUEST OF 1375 JUL 17- PM 2 33 tr. C:f:EC' ..i RECORDS G CLE':f;CN r" KING COUNTY. WAY— 0 Ul r•-• SY .'wcv k Ydoltml • tcc xc.s < u ••_co, r- S'd DUO] 1r d MGR cv : ;o lsanba.z at, PaT?3 pJooall ao� o31i� CERTIFICATE t WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: I,the c:Jcrsigned, d4Ay Clerk of the K • Office of the city.•.:tk City of Renton, Washington,Certify that this is a true C Renton Ntuni:i�:I building m 200 M venue South and correct copy of i - o- • /a` - .- Rentoq JA 'MOM. to Subscribed and Seal-••+ ' • -r I: of F ii 9±. s. Lt C: z '-I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON c: .� • F. r ORDINANCE NO. 4612 AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, I" ESTABLISHING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEW SERVICE IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HIGHLANDS, HEATHER t DOWNS, AND MAPLEWOOD SUB-BASINS AND ESTABLISHING THE 7 AMOUNT OF THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES. - i THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN x k 1 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I, There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer i Service Special Assessment District for the area served by. the East 1{ 6 Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor in the northeast quadrant of the 1 1 4Q City of Renton and a portion of its urban growth area within € I unincorporated King County, which area is more particularly fl g ' LO described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. A map of the service t I • area is attached as Exhibit "B." The recording of this document is i ; to provide notification of potential connection and interest i charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the i 1 City does not require payment until such time as the parcel is 1 connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The 1 property may be sold or in any other way change hands without i ttriggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges 3 i 1 associated with this district. SECTION II. Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer • facilities in this Special Assessment District and which properties • 11 1. t ' ORDINANCE 4612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling t i r.i units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit Y and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0.069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special f Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder t _Q are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "A" Aand which boundary is shown on the 'map attached as Exhibit "B." C„1' 4 SECTION III. In addition to. the aforestated charges, there ti, 0 shall be a charge of 4 .11% per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. 3 QD CI t The . interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest . i SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its , passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. 3 PASSED BY THE 1 CITY COUNCIL this 10th day of June 1996 . ' i i 1 Marilyn J etersen; City Clerk 2 , I 11 ■ ORDINANCE 4 612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this lath day of June , 1996. Jes a Tanner, Mayor Approve as to form: . atnrNaAA.c.P21:74.4-,ro.52-4 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96 :as. CI 04 W 3 Y . Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON-EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 and 22 all in Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. in King County,Washington Section 8,Township 23N,Range 5E W.M. • All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying East of the t East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the centerline of NE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its { intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast A of said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and the terminus of said line. e 4:D i Cl Section 9,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. h 9 t 1 CVto All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying South and r East of the following described line: - CDF } l Cr) Beginning on the centerline of the centerline NE 7th Street at its intersection with '. a of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 9; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of . NE 10th Street; thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. t[ i 14 i Section 10,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. i 1 All of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly f and Westerly of the following described line; Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its intersection with the North line of the South 1/2 of the North 1 of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly • along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said Section 10 and the terminus of said line. • • FADATAW EM19Q.07sb2UREVISEDSADLEQALdoc I . Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton-East Renton Interceptor Page 2 of 3 r. Section 11,Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M.. Section 14,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 1/4 of said section, together with the Southwest 1/4 of said section, except the South 1/ of the Southeast 1/4 of said Southwest 1/4 and exceptif the plat of McIntire Homesites and / of streets adjacent as recorded in the Book of Plats, Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County, Washington, and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of Cedar River 0 Five Acre Tracts as recorded in the Book of Plats,Volume 16, Page 52, Records of King County, Washington, less 1/ of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, CD Block 1, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts, less 1 of ;,p the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82.785 feet of (r) the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts and less C 'the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. t Lo Section 15,Township 23N, Range SE W.M. is All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M., except the Southwest A of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said section. i i i ; I Section i6, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. Y i { i • All of that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., except that i I portion of the Southeast 1A of the Southeast 1/4 of the said Section 16 lying East of 1 the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of a Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King County Washington and its Northerly I extension to the North line of said Southeast 14 of the Southeast V4 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly of the Northerly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway). k f k i! F I Section 17,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. , 1 All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying I Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying ; generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying , I 1 1. Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton—East Renton Interceptor Page 3 of 3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR 405. Section 21, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All that portion of Section 21, Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest ' of the Northeast '/4 of said Section 22 lying Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded in the Book of Plats, Crt volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County,Washington. " Together with the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast 1/4 of the 0.? Northeast'A of said Section 22. I 0 C/ • • • I s. i = yT 7 k + Le 37 L 7 1 1 } _ t r � isIDATANREM192,079112ZREvLSEDSADIEGALdoc Exhibit B EAST R NTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary Is s s r IItkAI �� I i .I SL p aa+ 1 �J LK 011-1 k s rr ttu ailifr i I �n�g J r�L'i. w£it*r., A ii H� N IOW 4 SE lifi_`n St ` E.,.., i K!Obl } St Mr,l� tr yr 1 i171h St .‘ ICA OE 0...Ai [J.m.m.LLISti .:41.: AO' 4. irir . f 1 1 4 j ear ...4y�Is 4144 t, t ‘ 41:-V9cArris" --,--,4-rr'.11040,4V ,--votfl.,01--,-i 11441r-41.0 t i ' fi t:tri I 1gl1O1 ►lam aira wow-l/ t it) ..rr1 40pyv.. owl I:fp:. 1—AT—Ai, / frio, .1 -iv, ir - 1.1 ,A .1,110, el s •-y.11�1 ..-_ �i..„. . Ai. .mot Al 11 / � 1 1 # I r vir:Ar ror 7,- -7-1p- r - ii- ',.) 4 . 1-40,1 i• .,,,y --� I Ar --If , i� I � 1� AA f AO r�T.� I< I , 1P•. trII •Ir • 4 . •*- • ' '' 'ifir-4FAAS' --iegio' --....,:,-..-__.„\\ . ":------+"-iArr ‘C ri zfdr le t- • A io/ .. -""...."VW:——''''- tr,r4S- -;.° L- 141_41401—irrt*I41/1A.L'L I t ' g •kif.„404," r • :--friFiri ‘F.4 1 .4 I -101r441 ,‘! "11*.L4“10:-' 41fif: ' '' `<ltr*fittii,PIFIFIFIKAir 4 . (V tt , --1,1% A.A.4,4kip..4.417 •Al 44E4! .2 1 E i I td. 4. ‘q.' , _..i-' __,) 1 .,,, , ,,N,,,,--_, , , _ • , ,_ i ce.. . - A 'f:Ci,:5,41tA•Kt,c,,, APT# ,, . t� I '�, 0 2000 , llty `- �,..Q w_J _.....:.ir.. �St:=:i•s:ti*'i-•.%sx:Gv:::•zet: y�� • '- ' r-- r !�"� 1 :24 000 L= ' [l It Z7H SI ', ri SP SOM sl S'� - , _ -• Y 01. SANITARY SEWERS City Limits , + Planing/Buar,glPubCc Works E27.7:73 Special Assessment District • dristeroen,MacOnie,Y}sneski "- Ned' 20 May 1996 { t",a 7 T .i, }K .v �� vt-e 17,t',illasryr L+i_.: 9 • 4. • 4 ; 4 In Wng Ca:n.ir ..ui.. c:� Celts Ms AUG 31 1994 ti 1 �. Cashier Section 2 Superior Court Clerk • 3 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 KING COUNTY, ) 6 Petitioner, ) NO. 9 4 - 2 22093 4 7 ) vs. ) NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS 8 ) MARTHA I. CARLSON and JOHN DOE ) 9 CARLSON, wife and husband, ) t4 WAYNE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) ;1 10 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) r? EUGENE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) O i1 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) CO CLAYTON JOHN CARLSON and JANE ) C 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • CD each as their separate estate, ) ��, 13 as to an undivided one-half ) CD interest and MIRAIM E. MICHAEL ) 14 and JOHN DOE MICHAEL, wife and ) husband, LEROY MICHAEL and ) 15 JANE DOE MICHAEL, husband and ) wife, LESTER MICHAEL and JANE .) 16 DOE MICHAEL, husband and wife, ) ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW and ) 17 JOHN DOE KUSSOW, wife and ) husband, WILLIAM H. WILSON and ) 18 JANE DOE WILSON, husband and ) wife, JACQULIN MILLER and JOHN ) 19 DOE MILLER, wife and husband, ) ESTELLE RAGSDALE and JOHN DOE ) 20 RAGSDALE, wife and husband, ) MERLYN PAGEL and JANE DOE ) 21 PAGEL, husband and wife, OLIVE ) KARVIA and JOHN DOE KARVIA, ) 22 wife and husband, DALE KAPPELL ) and JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband ) 23 and wife, FRANK KAPPELL and ) JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband and ) 24 wife, JANET V. COSLOR and JOHN ) DOE COSLOR, wife and husband, ) 25 BETTY CARPENTER and JOHN DOE ) Norm Makng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS — 1 Seattle,Wuhington 98101-2312 STRE1'LE\CARLSON\L15PEN.DEN (206)296.9015 FAX(206)296-0191 4 .. r'ut' :.y ' r y • l • 1 CARPENTER, wife and husband, ) GILBERT BREHM and JANE DOE ) 2 BREHM, husband and wife, DUANE ) BREHM and JANE DOE BREHM, ) 3 husband and wife, BARBARA ) BRYLES and JOHN DOE BRYLES, ) 4 wife and husband, ADRIS BUTLER ) and JANE DOE BUTLER, husband ) 5 and wife, GARY F. BASS and ) JANE DOE BASS, husband and ) 6 wife, each as their separate ) estate, as to the remainder, ) 7 HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. ) BERRY, husband and wife, or ) 8 their respective heirs and ) devisees, W. V. BRADLEY and ) 9 VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and ) wife and OIVA J: CARLSON and ) • 10 MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and ) wife, or their heirs and ) 11 devisees, PATSY A. CARLSON aka ) r\2 PATRICIA A. CARLSON and JOHN ) rr 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, Q STATE OF WASHINGTON, JERRY ) C.O 13 BENNETT and JANE DOE BENNETT, ) O husband and wife, d/b/a/ KINGS ) - CI 14 COURT, RAM REMANUFACTURING & ) O DISTRIBUTING, INC. NORTHWEST ) 15 AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. , UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL ) 16 REVENUE SERVICE, CONSOLIDATED ) COAL COMPANY, a corporation, ) - 17 GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA ) A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife, ) 18 or their respective heirs, ) JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. ) 19 GOODE, husband and wife, or ) their respective heirs, ) 20 HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. , ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 21 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND ) HEALTH SERVICES, JAMES L. ) 22 MARENAKOS, as his separate ) estate, ISAAC COOPER and JANE ) 23 DOE COOPER, husband and wife, ) ALICE MARY McEACHERN and JOHN ) 24 DOE McEACHERN, wife and ) husband, ALFRED HACKETT and ) 25 JANE DOE HACKETT, husband and ) Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION F350 King County Courthouse NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS — 2 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN (206)296-901S FAX(206)296-0191 -..:.rt"u.ira. ._x... ..+n........+a , ..., •.ftr r. r..,a, a4?_•Y,aS:a ... -.... .,iY,J,�.l..a �1.. •T .. ;�.3A' � �' 'w.ra�++. e. :..:u� { )ti t: t ;r ., S"". '` p "� 'hL"� "'' g 'x' tf• 'ro1 u4'"w, 17• -`o �{f}._t.�: ', ' ;� r 4 5: Y'S1 t ' t. `7r.., at'x, ..,R M.: ia'43:�i, 'S. i' r 7i ,a y,�iy x ,,{ ,�° � t ':1;:;:, ; f x�,,, .Yi s jSi.. "gig d +,u*a°4•il `VV,aCi ♦ +C1' it Y' .t4 Wit '{._ �� , ,t'i`N 3't # 'r x^ t r e.- N '�. ' / r t� f.Jh r .� aT' �i'c Y d'"x h- /"'�' �, Tt . a f•$0,7 << , 4 h4 4, 7 gri ?a-+r�:kT h .� `J� aw- til• 4 HW„ „e ✓, { r c A M yef' * r+c i �' x +f £,4 C t^ .w r �eyt� ,��w+� �� 1ti a^`Ca,ys...ar n�i. �"�1 �, F•o�tM 'r' �, .� i P. �a "f. �a� �� ;A�4�)y "'�': y �•}� >> ," Y y tm•w .� ..S� •:`-�-4;#*,.+'�+'� ��4�, �t �ii :x`�>E0t��yyt3"�'��`�'ffr� ;��`� ++i�a�r; •F..c�, ' x i t_ e P �� 4�igk� ,41Az.fr ){ter 6gi514, Cs'S: . �+'' 141T.''�y�- r .4 0.6' + � 4 fx�t r� ,* r '�-.' f f+{ aY a't#., : 'r r ,:'it '7 ,4",:"'rs ,'Qtj'x a.a 4,, 0.�i�,r5?( ,• :*4 ,..14-. q yy ..., ` s r -7',. ,ry . . a rgx . j -"' '.;;Ni A Sx; ,..;,'F -,.. i,,K..P. ici,i'�i qto Iu.vxgi,, rd N { :'• MF,rc�tgiA�.,. �3At;i e .M1.+ + * ia, ' �• . ,: � �xr �3. r t ,d Kor",s -..'ids .u.^). 's ,!�1 '1 }3.•�.'�'. ff "4, 1 • �p JJ Y:. Y y r w. 1 1 wife, MATHILDA CORKLE and JOHN ' ) `i; DOE CORKLE, wife and husband, ) � 1 . 2 O. J. CARLSON and KELLY :. ) Ora; CARLSON, husband and wife and ) ,~ 3 ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS OR ) ,4 1 PARTIES, INCLUDING UNKNOWN ) 4 HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF ANY ) )„.. PERSON DECEASED, CLAIMING ANY ) `'`"„_ t 5 RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR ) a'',' INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE ) 6 DESCRIBED HEREIN, ) 7 Respondents. ) -. i ) 8 ) 1 9 ) in the { 10 NOTICE is hereby given that action has been commenced : ";; ,r4 11 above-entitled court on the petition of the Petitioner above named 1 C 1 da 12 against the above-named Respondents, that the object of said action i 0 CO 13 is to acquire title to the premises hereinafter described, to bar y .`. O Cr, 14 the Respondents and each of them having or asserting any right, CD Tle 15 title, estate, lien or interest in or to said premises adverse to 16 Petitioner's fee simple title thereto, that the action affects title 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ., 1.i44 -' • Norm Maleng =K'rt...• ,. Prosecuting Attorney CL DMSION M ; E550 King County Courthouse ;_ NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS - 3 Seattk,Washington 98104.2312 '..x STREYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN (206)296-9015 r `eK2.v_ 1 FAX(206)296.0191r i.tv .,: .;: > ''2 _ l. o-' "tL g— .. t if 72 c '-'f.• -4,4-- r.:F:,,i,=,,. '�l�`e^xt ,`:ry' • r.it'r�rz�7,Pti e { ,e,n2./fS` tM';+.ft' I ' w,f.-..i, `E. mri b7F"'.l"r•T X v' f as w '•rim,,T -,- } _t: ::, , ,Z w� j.M rN r...; r' '.', is 1"''':* i!n'` :4140.0,;, per.9,x. T �k ,� t ,r .} c., +>t v f ,td' '�'Pt r ,,�y n� j's}tY �� -�' r'e. !!jk'yt � . � r ' rj i5-,1. rot3 , '' t rrd' t ilr.� +r'.�t ,„'C ✓ rr 3 Y 1 tiX � ' r�r '+i,r t ?#" y'.� '' r i y +_�t<�h sFp y"� �' r s tz �t E, � y t f :+�, ' i - -`,' s Ga S t+l�. ,• ,J� ,),,,.r s&s7 t�4 ti 3 x { i,-,i�0.1, +� t 3 ?,,,l r 'A ry .kr ,:74,,, . Y •Y Y ' " a"sr 7 f Y id- 4 ryi" i t 1 F '�` 4 -{r�r s.�`�'��'�i-�L��,✓.E�;r-4rt'?��' xfn itxy, c.yt 5a" ��:.k his t .. rl,sh i' ;i S 04�y1% ..ASt+�y 14 r"yj,.,te9gWx 4 e.� + h i X'( '1r �' +r ny.� ''nh ! 7' J'{14: :'' r a,4�My{ •b4 hP4:,Y !'.i't i.li' ,44 ]1 G Y C't !'4+,.? �`l ,, t r,, t ..H .W;,1::r.'�+.Z sy n. ,,,#,„,i�.y, �_.^}Mti t;tr! n Yr. t.” i�s 4✓ ,t r t...-,�3�i+�r?Ke ,�i^t 4., r r r '}'ir 3+• 1' '�q0 T ^F x. }. _. _._ .. i, ,Y r 1 to the real estate more particularly described in Exhibit "A", a , 2 copy of which is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference '-% 3 herein. 4 Dated this day of .2.(e,Ci/2.. , 1994. t 5 NORM MALENG King County Prosecuting Attorney , 6 By: .L '//rim'., ,_ % i/' , ( • 8 THOMAS W, KUFFEL, WSBA# 20118 Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 9 Attorney for King County 10 • ri 4 11 •• O 12 t C) 13 .le14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Norm Maleog Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse to NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS - 4 Seattle,Washington 98100.2312 '. ). STREYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN (206)296.9015 ; ' FAX(206)296-0191 z If. . . 44- rta., -u' .s4_a-a, --. r..-};- >{.''•�i•„ (y t�1 'K i}Yw,wiWfH�..,��f �:'r« '` 7x., 4'. `'i: • . ..'t'. ,. q � '�ns M1Rl k+ xt, i .4,: Y�5 .,i '.'° sr5r'x'•i • • .ron 4 _a ..... .r n a.M..... ..,.:.a. w.r.r,wrvANwS+MS-.Hw•.er!:s.rw!w.t•..c — a. . .. .. '-zr.... ._. ... ,i;l. tt 1 2 • 3 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 KING COUNTY, ) 6 ) Petitioner, ) NO. 7 ) Vs. ) PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION 8 ) MARTHA I. CARLSON and JOHN DOE ) 9 CARLSON, wife and husband, ) WAYNE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) 10 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) EUGENE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) t4 11 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) CLAYTON JOHN CARLSON and JANE ) C12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • (JD each as their separate estate, ) C 13 as to an undivided one-half ) 01 interest and MIRAIM E. MICHAEL ) C 14 and JOHN DOE MICHAEL, wife and ) da husband, LEROY MICHAEL and ) Q) 15 JANE DOE MICHAEL, husband and ) wife, LESTER MICHAEL and JANE ) 16 DOE MICHAEL, husband and wife, ) ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW and ) 17 JOHN DOE KUSSOW, wife and ) husband, WILLIAM H. WILSON and ) 13 JANE DOE WILSON, husband and ) wife, JACQULIN MILLER and JOHN ) • 19 DOE MILLER, wife and husband, ) ESTELLE RAGSDALE and JOHN DOE ) 20 RAGSDALE, wife and husband, ) MERLYN PAGEL and JANE DOE ) 21 PAGEL, husband and wife, OLIVE ) KARVIA and JOHN DOE KARVIA, ) 22 wife and husband, DALE KAPPELL ) and JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband ) 23 and wife, FRANK KAPPELL and ) JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband and ) 24 wife, JANET V. COSLOR and JOHN ) DOE COSLOR, wife and husband, ) 25 BETTY CARPENTER and JOHN DOE ) Norm Malcng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION • E550 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 1 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296-9015 FAX(206)296-0191 F•� .... ...�'."�...u2%..Ya•1'". '..bWL,ti7.., °', ...„t-: r .,+.c X z:+`'1?9...L, t.!S ..7`_,�J'S' s� J::"r 'YF.'. i I _...s:c ` .[ �W:u�434..rs:..Stk-.,r, �•'L �.�i` .'1.. i 1 - 0 1 CARPENTER, wife and husband, ) GILBERT BREHM and JANE DOE ) 2 BREHM, husband and wife, DUANE ) BREHM and JANE DOE BREHM, ) be 3 husband and wife, BARBARA ) 1: ¢ BRYLES and JOHN DOE BRYLES, ) 4 wife and husband, ADRIS BUTLER ) itand JANE DOE BUTLER, husband ) 5 and wife, GARY F. BASS and ) JANE DOE BASS, husband and ) • t 6 wife, each as their separate ) estate, as to the remainder, ) ,': 7 HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. ) i `' BERRY, husband and wife, or ) s 8 their respective heirs and ) devisees, W. V. BRADLEY and ) 9 VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and ) wife and DIVA J. CARLSON and ) 10 MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and ) wife, or their heirs and ) 1.4 11 devisees, PATSY A. CARLSON aka ) ,,/ PATRICIA A. CARLSON and JOHN ) 'd' 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • Q STATE OF WASHINGTON, JERRY ) CD 13 BENNETT and JANE DOE BENNETT, ) 0 husband and wife, d/b/a/ KINGS ) 0) 14 COURT, RAM REMANUFACTURING & ) 0 DISTRIBUTING, INC. NORTHWEST ) Cr 15 AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. , UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL ) 16 REVENUE SERVICE, CONSOLIDATED ) COAL COMPANY, a corporation, ) 17 GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA ) A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife, ) 18 or their respective heirs, ) JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. ) 19 GOODE, husband and wife, or ) their respective heirs, ) 20 HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. , ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 21 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND ) HEALTH SERVICES, JAMES L. ) 22 MARENAKOS, as his separate ) estate, ISAAC COOPER and JANE ) 23 DOE COOPER, husband and wife, ) ALICE MARY McEACHERN and JOHN ) 24 DOE McEACHERN, wife and ) . • husband, ALFRED HACKETT and ) 25 JANE DOE HACKETT, husband and ) Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CML DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 2 Startle,Washington 98104-2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296.9015 FAX(206)296-0191 i k 1, E -s:S. ....,..... _...>-.' ,.trir..:: ... .,�i..•.:. ::. _._ ,._.-:o- �Ys'lGwiw ,.®;yo..-• s,_.'! z ‘1- TtF+ \ -� .:S. .�?..�Ci'.ka...K'3s>.1w.'u�l@+ *+eSiI; �- ., S r YS x-_ Kyyt ...gyp 73y .i�.3 .. `Y s r i , „ yyr f t.<�k, yyr - o-M m4 9 rtt .n'� yrr Pcd fa.% - T?� 77 yE f'M. '• v .` � � a �, ., y.- � � y�a v � ,�a t 1 t ,a �, �; fie. � r 4 l '� .r y - t y a: p a 9a�pt� .ti a ♦, Y Y 4�,'. t 1 a r# .r .�-,4 , �'-r. tiry ytj i{7aF''�.F 3,pata4 .Sraxr -tt"s`,r1'�a�1` ;•3a �vr'' S r7. yy,�1...a�J r ,c4�,,tt�r .,#•1Sr' l q, .�`i }r ,h, > 1 s i tf�`ru'iw°i i` 41.70.'w sss n. ry„19 y '''fin, t-Y ) V .� r.an t'Ci s ..,¢ ,-', r tg t i.Ti y } y r "t 'S 43� Fi e4 # a�r 4 a :� • • ,eh y :_ �""v.,��s�v- r "b .p„-i`V3 ! '. a fA�9 "Kt ^ .�' v: f Na 7 J 'rf: ' '�a, k ck�tr t3-' v� 5 • n_ 4. �t - ;k�rY .¢, ''"1 T/' w ni^;Y•., '§"#s .F„' r"�4Ls -a :'DPt Y } ' r i,,., 1 wife, MATHILDA CORKLE and JOHN ) DOE CORKLE, wife and husband, ) 2 0. J. CARLSON and KELLY ) CARLSON, husband and wife and ) ' 3 ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS OR ) PARTIES, INCLUDING UNKNOWN ) 4 HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF ANY ) PERSON DECEASED, CLAIMING ANY ) 5 RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR ) INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE ) 6 DESCRIBED HEREIN, ) 7 Respondents. ) 8 ) 9 ) 10 • it King County petitions and represents to the court as follows: • „1' 12 1. King County is a duly organized and existing class AA d O co 13 county of the State of Washington empowered with the right of C) 14 eminent domain. O d' 15 2. King County seeks to take or appropriate certain real 16 property described herein located within the County ( "the proper- 17 ty" ) . 18 3. The property King County seeks to take or appropriate is 19 necessary for a public use, that is, for the acquisition and 20 development of the 1989 Open Space Bond 'Cedar River to Lake 21 Sammamish Trail Project. 22 4. King County has attempted to acquire the property by 23 negotiation, but has been unable to agree with the owners. 24 5. The King County Council, by Ordinance No. 11175, passed on 25 December 13, 1993, has directed the Prosecuting Attorney to petition Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION FS50 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 3 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296-9015 FAX(206)296.0191 . =- - a <.._ r •. .�. .... Wa ra�'`3-t�'�':V1M Yet 'V:Wf'Y'1.�I A , n e v as 4i f 5 k rFa py: lh atf ihS s M M,.iY tr ii^° t .t ye f r4 k{$ kY + 4 vF k.. - - 1 Y.t iii4.i .e F ¢;: . . 4 1 r1 i r t :+ r 1 , y• ' t t ;a r x a ' A n Y $ t :y r X t''tl-4 Y 4 * �'i i tj T. 11 i r tr > r.+ .a :i-40± +f,� a E ' x r4$Artg 4 a ?1 \ t ,s- 1 1,�r...i, lx s , r'JIP:A' { £ 1 at x C in N t tS 3 *e aii...•1 :' e *f.! ' Vr ', y S: � : r . N. 1 ,: i m 1 x Ja• Syr -! -e' 4 S?:r i.JJ°"'bo; ..c. 3 1 for condemnation of the property. A copy of the ordinance is 2 attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 6. The property sought to be taken or appropriated is f 4 described in Exhibit A. : 5 7. The name of every owner or other person interested in the 6 property, so far as can be ascertained from the public records, is 1 7 set out in Exhibit B. 8 WHEREFORE, King County prays that an order be entered: - 9 1. Adjudicating that the contemplated use for which the 10 property is sought to be taken or appropriated is really a public v ' N 11 use of the County, and that the taking or appropriation of the da � CDCD 12 property is necessary for that public use. - 13 2. Directing that a determination be made of the compensation 14 and damages to be paid to the owners of the property, and to all C 15 other persons interested therein, for the taking or appropriation of 16 the property, such determination to be made by a jury, unless 17 waived, in which event the compensation or • damages shall be 18 determined by the Court without a jury. 19 DATED this "'1 day of /(, �',' - , , 1994. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 NORM MALENG King County Prosecuting Attorney 223 2 (/ ABY: l f 24 THOMAS W. KUFFEL, WSBA# 20118 Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 25 Attorneys for King County --- Norm Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 4 Seattle,Washington 98104-2312 STREYI.E\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296-9015 FAX(206)296-0191 . ite .a rad4 f , k{r r .,;:.:::;.40„...,::),,:;.:.:43.:z::-..4,6...,,z,..e:., ,. - .-,,..: jf7 a$7T R;�Sx,,Y. ,X,,P4i-'' (to,. n SKa�' ii�, ."' k d 144 *".Fi.,a 1',.c / 4 7 n w t j c e t, 7 -..F 4 r a2 1 a 4i..04:',7�.4; 4.. s f•';�4 Yrt4 p -14. "t1 t gi ., .fi: -.-�'41�� SnS.Trp f ` �* `. 74 :: J� 1•4 U 4 ... . ._.._ .. =ys ,� .,-sw,rnF,� Sys v„ .. -.: i.. ;• aw ! r 4 ) a December 9, 1993 Introduced bye Phillips " 93-874S.NM (dd) .bs; Proposed No.: 93-874 r 1 ORDINANCE NO. .1 1 175 2 AN ORDINANCE authorizing condemnation 3 of the Finer Homes, Marsnakos, and Carlson 4 properties for the acquisition and development 5 of th 1989 Open Space Bond Cedar River to Lake 6 Samaaaish Trail project. 7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF XING COUNTY: ' 8 SECTION 1. The council finds and declares as follows: 9 A. Xing County is authorized by state law R.C.N. 4 10 36.34.340, R.C.N. 36.68.010, A.C.N. 36.89.030 and R.C.N. 11 64.04.130, to acquire, develop, renovate and improve public 12 green spaces, greenbelts, open space, parks and trails in Xing 13 County. 14 B. Xing County is authorized to acquire and condemn real , 15 property for public use, such as green spaces, green belts, 1"4 16 open space, parks and trails, by Chapter 8.08, R.C.N. RI 17 C. The Xing County Capital Improvement Program provides 18 for the acquisition of lands for the Cedar River to Lake 0 19 Sammamish Trail and includes the Finer Homes, Marenakos, and 0 20 Carlson parcels (hereinafter called the "Properties') as more el 21 particularly described below. 22 D. Pursuant to applicable federal and state procedures 23 and the real property acquisition procedures of King County, 24 King County has taken the necessary steps to acquire the 25 Properties through negotiations. 26 E. Pursuant to such applicable procedures, King County 27 has made written offer to purchase the Properties on the 28 following dates: 29 Firmer Homes: Hay 5, 1993 30 August 8, 1993 31 October 6, 1993 32 Harenakos: June 6, 1992 , 33 December 12, 1992 34 July 7, 1993 35 Carlson: Hay 5, 1993 36 June 17, 1993 37 August 12, 1993 38 October 10, 1993 1 `",..,�'. t 6aL\" F..ei 0 d.x. , b .t t- ,"d, .V..: Y.e+x{.Ki;`-wss•.N - f.0it. rl'a'4,;rNl WA..x... .."�'. k; a ..'% 5.,..-* ,cv.eu •'-,3 ...e,a.x €.. .. m 461. • 11175 1 F. In order to acquire the property and property rights 2 required to construct the Cedar River to Lake Sammamish Trail, 0 3 it is necessary for Xing County to condemn the Properties for 4 public purposes as hereinafter more particularly set forth. 5 G. The public health, safety, necessity, convenience, and 6 welfare demand that the Cedar River to Lake Sammamish Trail be 7 constructed in accordance with the King County Capital 8 Improvement Program, and that the Properties be condemned, 9 appropriated, taken and damaged for the construction of said 10 trail as provided in this ordinance. 11 SECTION Z. The King County council has deemed it 12 necessary and in the best interest of the citizens of King 13 County that the Properties be condemned, appropriated, taken 2 14 and damaged for the purpose of constructing the Cedar River to Q15 Lake Sammamish Trail, subject to the making, or paying, of just :AD 16 compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by CD 17 law. The Properties are described as follows: CD rr 18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR FINER HOMES PROPERTY 19 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian trail 20 purposes over, across, upon and through the following described 21 property: 22 The South 100 feet AND the East 100 feet of the Southwest 23 quarter of the Northwest quarter; 24 ALSO the East 100 feet of the Southeast quarter of the 25 Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter; 26 All in Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in 27 King County, Washington. 28 (Contains an area of 7.35 acres, more or less.) 29 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR MARENAROS PROPERTY 30 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 31 over, across, upon and '_hrough the following described 32 property: 33 The South 50 feet, except the West 25 feet thereof, and the 34 West 25 feet of that portion of the North half of the North 35 half of the Southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of 36 Section 12, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King 37 County, Washington, described as follows: 38 Beginning at the Northwest corner of said subdivision; 39 thence South O1.11'57" West, along the West line thereof, 40 325.64 feet to the Southwest corner of said subdivision; 41 thence South 86.42'14" East 30.02 feet to the Easterly margin 42 of 164th Avenue Southeast and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 43 thence continuing South 86.42'14" East, along the South line of 44 said subdivision, 1239.33 feet to the Northwesterly margin of 2 • i� J 11175 1 the Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right 2 of way; 3 thence North 49.12'42" East, along said Northwesterly margins 4 56.05 feet to the East line of said subdivision; S thence North 01.21'09", along said East line, 179.07 feet; 6 thence North 86.43'48" West 1281.47 feet to the Easterly margin 7 of 164th Avenue Southeast; 8 thence South Ol'11'57" West along said East margin 217.53 feet 9 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 10 (Contains an area of 1.55 acres, more or less.) 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CARLSON PROPERTY - PARCEL 3Q 12 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 13 over, across, upon and through the following described 14 property: 15 Beginning at a point on the South boundary line of the 16 Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 29, 17 Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.M., in King County, 18 Washington, said point being 202 feet West of the Southeast • 19 corner of said Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of 20 said Section 29; 21 thence in a straight line South 10.12' East 32 feet; • 22 thence curving to the left, with a 10.51.5' curve through 23 10.50' of curvature, a distance of 99.08 feet; 24 thence in a straight line South 21.01' East 285 feet; 25 thence curving to the right, with a 13.24' curve through 17.48' 26 of curvature, a distance of 132.08 feet; 0 27 thence South 3.14' East 810 feet to a point 50 feet West of the (D 28 Southeast corner of said Section 29; 0 29 thence East 50 feet to said Section corner; 30 thence North, along the East line of said Section 29, a O 31 distance of 1315 feet to the Northeast corner of the Southeast 32 quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 29; "r 33 thence West 202 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CO 34 (Contains an area of 2.42 acres, more or less.) 35 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR MARENAKOS PROPERTY - PARCEL 37 36 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 37 over, across, upon and through the following described 38 property: 39 The East 50 feet of that portion of the Northeast quarter of 40 the Southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 6 41 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: 42 Beginning at the Southeast corner of said subdivision; 43 thence North, along the East line of said section, 381 feet; 44 thence West 1168 feet, more or less, to the East boundary of 45 Sunset Highway; 45 thence Southeasterly, along the East margin of Sunset Highway, 47 384 feet to the South line of said subdivision; 48 thence East, along said South line, 1121 feet, sore or less, to 49 the POINT OF BEGINNING. 50 (Contains an area of 0.44 acres, more or less.) 51 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CARLSON PROPERTY - PARCEL 64 • 52 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes • 53 over, across, upon and through the following described 54 property: 55 Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 28, Township 24 56 North, Range 6 East, N.H., in King County, Washington; 57 thence East 50 feet; 3 >fe5ihi;w 't'"&' a vv' rae' ls . .:,2 ! ti.� F'i tug' s 'i�r►_,�" •;wigs: .y t ._7 .• +'}.nee + hi 3 '� SyYM 7 2. y, « n p F f x Y • 11175 1 thence North 3• west $12 feet; 2 thence on a 12• curve to the left a distance of 141.03 feet; • 3 thence Northwesterly to a point on the West line of said • • 4 Section which is 990 feet North of the Southwest corner of said 5 Section; 6 thence South to the POINT of BEGINNING. 7 (Contains an area of 1.08 acres, more or less.) t 8 SECTION 3. The King County council determines that 9 condemnation proceedings are hereby authorized to acquire the 10 Properties for the purposes of subject Parks trail. 11 SECTION 1. The attorneys for King County are hereby 12 authorized and dlrected to begin and prosecute the proceedings 13 provided by law to condemn, take and appropriate the Properties 14 necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance. This 15 action shall not be initiated regarding the Carlson property 16 until 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance. This 17 action shall not be intitiated regarding the Finer Homes 18 property until the county has complied with all provisions of Iri 19 RCW 8.26 and other relevant laws. ^� day *1120 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this Uov 21 of , 19 qq�= 22 PASSED this / day of 1 , 19(� 23 KING COUNTY COUNCIL grt 24 KING COUNTY, W SHINGTON t, 25 26 Chair 27 ATTEST: 28 �J .4.."""' 03J 29 Clerk of the council 30 APPROVED this di 7,27 day of v45441D«i . , 293 31 32 g County Executive 33 Attachments: Maps 4 ' Il e: R "VT�W1.410 ' f. . .` •--,..r.,..•sil.ft,v,7.7,1;- 1;:lr...wwWW•41.04: ''1, ''''''`:1',4"'::-At*.tii—'7407.1,,'"'Am-TrIAT e.,0,4 q,,,,. 7,4.,,,,.:.. ,• ,. .„ 1,,.., ..7 ,,,, .., ' ' ' ' •''•"-...:64ri44 .#14c-f•VFI044t1144. Va'4...4;"Ir.-i,..• ra+Nr° - ''' " 0,,,D,.iv,,,,-ef --ft.,-li p.-vt.-,4-,.. ,4, kiwv,I61,,,,,.,*,-zi,:np.,,,,,2,.z..,,,-,-....i.),4,1,. ..,41.,,,-,,:-.1,4, ,....,_: .:,.. .. -'•-...'...::.:.... .,:: :;,1.0.q....,,,r,..6..c-„.40;di.,::.,4".:;;.:44.,,,. os,i;e;,,,:k,(4. '.1. .. ,:4,,,i44: . -**.;_,..,--ri .--a,A'Tz-,..x,:.i. ,,,-f,LktliAr,,,,,t,i,,;1:,:11-4.4totv.?,;,, ,,4:,:,;',7,121.,',..1,,7 ,4:,,:`,.,,I.,':,. •• it wain :: ::' •:.',,,':i:-•;_...N.i..;',.4,-"Tyl:'.:,;,..vi. ,:,..',-,:::Pir'lltfk:: :%fir4.,,if4,010; ".. •' - • ,;,',4,4-,..-2;014:0,,,,c,,,,,4% . .4--• ..,e1 iff;.,„,,i kfat,fr-t*.',44,3:,64,,,:ve'2.,':-1471;ar,...,',- .•,-• .... :..',-/-,,..-,.,",'•0.4A,;1;,-.,..*,',;;,i...,4..:-.14:,-,%,, ,A14...,--9. : , ' _4,,'..;,.,1,0;7 1,zty4,_z,l,',.,, ,4'.. 1,.. t,cL4t.',.;.F.7.413.;, ',4,12'N''-'.. '.',4',-;',IiA:'•.,i-5:;,i, ',: • " '... ..•i-z-:„qic.2.:24.?!"..-..!'`-?.5-4.?7;-. . ..-',1*.t..1.',.-...:1..,-.1.4010-4 A..,-,,,',. ;VP;c: -.---71-NA''"'A,;---' $9,-,..4ali';v74.1A'••eigil,,,,;,?A.:;:e ,::%••-•. ....4.:: :•.:1•••-,„..',.::,v7.1 ..--,:,..de.5.-•.4:-.:,::-,5-,4,_•tv;ft,rt:,stopi.f.51.?;..4,,T,. r.4-0A..'.i.;* , ,fklut;,,•'-',-ds&---FitiWk*Iszolit' • "!.:1„: -4.11,*4-.::::t4V-;d,--.A.,13W:1-'=„44',V.-0,7'4,f•c•-•':-.,, •.• - -i.,:,:sk,-.:.-;-)ii.::,:ii..;i•v7./.-„ii-i,!--,4;i7---1,7:00,,,ww.i-ItAutt --ic.,*•Rekt-t-,• ls.w.--#..,47,,.:-.7^9;‘,'44,..,•:, , Ari,,,,,,,4,!., :,..4.....„,.„,,,..,:„ -5,.(A,,.,,,,,4,-.;4„.:..*.:,e,t,,,t:7';',.. .fr,..:,;-'"1:1,S,'..',...j4i....,: Oit4A'4.10';L14',A741:4 4,0-417i,‘::(14`;lnairi'4VAP7-' Li,.-441,44:.71. 1":„C''';';'1"."'q:Zi''`k?eat4,,,•.;;Zet*,+ S.AA'46t3,ii. it'..1W.:21,1rAift,,,410.:.1§L-21it'74."..:. 7:!.:;ta•-•--, -4 , ,,,,...If-,"..-C_4.',4 ,i''.•-;.',Vi. ..S.(4Virgri:ilvt'',14 :4tAtt:',e,3PAZ ," *4`,.'' "--"'• ' ` ' c,,,, " -. , . . . . i 7z,.:.•• , wg', , ..,,,,. _;.,, , . . . . . . . -; . .. . ,- „ . . . . . „ , . ' wil/. • . . ... .7 ,11175 , --, 1 .. . ... . - , '! •... . , ... AT TITLE COMPANY . . . . 1-, of vaskiznzton Inc.'. • • . ' , ,••:,i.: _ ORDEO /D9 9.5-0 g ...-; - •- • ;: : , - - •• - - R N . 1.•: . , . . 4. IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey.It is furnished as a convenience to locate tne land ificicalta" , ?I , :•:, hereon wurt utterance to streets and otner tam No lisoillty is assumed Oy reason of retiance bream • Ilk . . .. • *a I 1 '' • .- • • • • . . . t ; .1 . .. . i • •-• ...••• .- nr........._____—.......j. — —Tr- Tds . • pr. , A. 1 ant : 1 I 1 I .6• I 1 1 j 1 I i I •sr I 1.--- -..—........1 e 3 _ . 4) : lil •• . r4 2 - I A C.2 : izr I i 1 0 I .2 t CO L. .........d . .,. • I ,.. i. 711 I i I, Cr) I •; .. • .... :1; .. .....0.9 CP ,• •• ..- ..e.rar• : •••11.1.0 / .,. i I 004 i ...; ...• itioilil ]I. .f l . ..... 11 .: It 1.1 I 1 ti 1 . kl i i 7; I ii!a 1 . . : - . ••.. . • . 1,.• •'I I . .• 100 7..4. • ,•.!; \I • .... •t t. ' .1 0 , • • .7.'. *... • . ...' . . ?.. • ... • • r... . 1 .p.• .., .:•:-..- 0 I . . ,..... I ....•... ..." 0 :-.,%,• -a....• • L., ..• -. --:- __ - . .". •:.:.:.:“.:.....!....1••••• ..4... • -. ..—.....:,, •.•••• se:.••,. -- ..., i ,.,... . • • ....., . • \tooter- - • i , .,:-.•-.G . . •:.. . • • • , . • N-1. t.•,.1., .:474,1 • • FiNeg. 1-toiliss : . • • 3:„..;. ,. . -, .. .,, . . . . ...,.%, . . .r, I Q. ` • • .• UaI~II/11\1 11 / 6.1. \.V11r14I. ' a 'I•: 9409060421 „ ',,',` of Washington, Inc. 15��/L� c, ti . ORDER NO. ,, IMPORTANT:This Is not a Plal of Survey.II Is furnished as a convenience to locale the land Indicated hereon with reference to sheets and other land.No liability Is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. 4,1 1. :: 1e25 o S.z ySy40,( o* ,/ u. /? ,23 —S c F' Y 5y i f l NO t t �^{di�,s+es �4 x a .`I i ,* 4 s f1 \- ,,}. g i'r°.y Z t n • vk`x > , t f.. _ __ - -0%L ;l•♦#• .LIL Ol .. .._.�...�� .�.. a5't4 b .,y rr ca , — I3I1.72— a... ^� -,S }.'eri#N , i ILO,II I. > ..er'. ♦' L • ::: :4 I .\t'tilit li ' . ' : ---- _••=•=1.••••••11, 414. . `•r ;j(a : ',... 'A ` (' • e i amtt tiiii,iiillI� � !�.4� .: XW100___ .a •,1f � .4!�• l?wii:O .••••• r L1 �..7)r{A•i.Y is`..f.S4t�,, .. • . l' 6..'4 4 l 'y€ r 51 t1 ' 4 3t - ' -. N1ARFMK0s • !., s, t S ter • F �. • 1 ( 1 •1• I a V_ . !1,. •• °ROM NO 50�g) y�.:.• , 9409060421 IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey.II Is furnished as a convenience to locale the land Indicated x.i hereon with reference to streets and other land.No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. PO 1 N • {. ...". 3:..„......-..i,,,,::4:...,..,•6....„1,,'...' :,:- .: !I N Il 1,1 ' ' ;41.:;44:"-'..1.':-1';';'4',.1. "''''';-'14i.i...Vtif.,1,::0,7•Kil:, '4' , a , , , s pf \• k :, vo::,,,,,,,,,?-.....,,,,--...., • 7 ",' es♦ , 4:1.4 , '1 , .y PI k C 1q 9C E., ,. ,V}' ` — '--._...._-—_-__-_...____.-_..- ___._J/K /l•2I! •./If J) 1'n S"iM-}sue�'#tr?mac .�yx' P. , , • iy ,i-ma 4:4%eL..11 ..,,t,,,:‘,..•.,,,,,,,,,i..,„..,,,.. x 4 4 `, . , 14 T•' ♦10 . Y FFF��^)t_, • 11 7'�gg 41 4 1, a ,.,.. / ii • Aim R FNAK OS imil T"r l �.' / _ • . PARCEL 36 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON and CLAYTON (JOHN) CARLSON, each as their separate estate, as to an undivided one-half interest and • MIRAIM E. MICHAEL, LEROY MICHAEL, LESTER MICHAEL, ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW, WILLIAM H. WILSON, JACQULIN MILLER, ESTELLE t RAGSDALE, MERLYN PAGEL, OLIVE KARVIA, DALE KAPPELL, FRANK KAPPELL, JANET V. COSLOR, BETTY CARPENTER, GILBERT BREHM, DUANE BREHM, BARBARA BRYLES, ADRIS BUTLER and GARY F. BASS, each as their separate estate, as to the remainder Record Owners HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. BERRY, husband and wife, or their respective heirs and devisees Reservation of coal and minerals W. V. BRADLEY and VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and wife and OIVA J. CARLSON and MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and wife., or their heirs and devisees Agreement for water system 2 UNKNOWN ▪ Numerous judgment and/or liens against Eugene Carlson O C. UNKNOWN O Numerous judgment and/or liens against Clayton (John) CarlsonOI • PATSY A. CARLSON wr CIJudgment against Wayne A. Carlson STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Henry Gossage, aka Willie Wilson, Jr. Judgment against Willie Wilson Judgment against William B. Robertson, aka John Harris; William G. Nelson; John Williams, William Wilson; Jack Williamson; William N. Robertson; Larry Normans; and John Wilson; d/b/a A & B Investments; Little Castle; Mr. Bills; and Billco; and Debra L. Carmen and Jennifer Shong, d/b/a/ Mr. Bills Drive-In & Restaurant Judgment against Gene Carlson aka Gene Carlsen UNKNOWN Unidentified claimants based on the assertion that the former interest of the Consolidated Coal Company was a right of way and not a fee simple interest. UNKNOWN Interest of the Estate of W. V. Bradley arising from the fact that no order completing the estate has been filed. i,Y, s >,:. ,,. Y'�r,M1,7�'"ir"�, f x`.f ,• ya,. ?e .1 k ' r{�h i ..,ur ..'i. s`.. � ,V,_....:c� g .. .- � �' -.. -... ,_ _ .. ... � ..��'S33E:iic�ue.✓ydi? X La y ` ,y� v jr •k �+ r s a Z• rtr1.4 ►V+t, f.W x 1 i rs,` 4 � • 3 t JERRY BENNETT, d/b/a/ KINGS COURT Judgment against William Wilson, et al. PATSY A. CARLSON, aka PATRICIA A. CARLSON • • Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES Lien against Wayne C. Carlson RAM REMANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING, INC. Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. Judgment against Gene A. Carlson and Arvilla Carlson UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Three federal tax liens against Gene A. and Arvilla Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ri r Beginning at the a point on the south boundary line of the northeast O quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24 North, CD Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, said point being 202 O feet west of the southeast corner of said northeast quarter of the CI southeast quarter of said Section 29; O thence in a straight line south 10°12 ' east 32 feet; 'r thence curving to the left with a 10° 51.5' curve through a 10°50' CI of curvature a distance of 99.08 feet; thence in a straight line south 21°2 ' east 285 feet; thence curving to the right with a 13°24 ' curve through 17°48 ' curvature, a distance of 132.08 feet; thence south 3°14 ' east 810 feet to a point 50 feet west of the southeast corner of said Section 29; thence east 50 feet to said section corner; thence north along the east line of said Section 29 a distance of 1315 feet to the northeast corner of thr southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 29; thence west 202 feet to the point of :.>eginniny. • rv.• 'i Sip s' t • • I.. , • PARCEL 37 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON and CLAYTON (JOHN) CARLSON, each as their respective separate estates in indeterminate interests • Record Owners • CONSOLIDATED COAL COMPANY, a corporation Easement grantee UNKNOWN water pipe easement GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife and JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. GOODE, husband and wife, or their respective unknown heirs Reservation of coal, oil or clay r4 SPOUSES OF THE VESTEES, if any :1 (Homestead rights if spouses live on property) cr QJ• HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. O Agreement regarding water rights and easement 0) C STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES vr Lien against Wayne C. Carlson STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Gene Carlson, aka Gene Carlsen RAM REMANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING, INC. Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. Judgment against Gene Carlson and Arvilla Carlson UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Three federal tax liens against Gene Carlson and Arvilla Carlson • • 12,§�4b 'J �t }" v tai � '' rt4 u i .W. wj.r Ai -girk 514);.'T r kx`. G ; .. • t ?. k 4�tx"�t',. i5,i%�s3X �'„s lir, S.G �i°ir• I rt�T i E- '� r • i.+ .+.. �, itss rs "'tt• �' .w�e+F y t i'x F4 T ° - t' tiC w • .� 'f 5t�� J '� 4 c1.', h x r yy x ae / Ys i•1, p a • n+v ifiY ) d wN '.Sy�7, 4•�E .y y, ,, w Ey'N• xrl�:.a° i K..r '`i,. e �h � ;as3 U per. 'F �sfwt '�'e9lraf '3 �a �+"�t�' A 3 sct+e� t ray �v �- • n xf 7iC? ��' rt3 .�' ,,'•+i•[.5t- ar -� °1-.e+ �.ic - - rA 6y� t taa.r sv i yz.2! t l�. r":^ � .' '•• .. '"� -_... Mh ��' 4 i•':j r 'x�"'+7•��r s.F"�'� �s•';, ''`id✓ 4.«.-....r.. z .� • PATSY A. CARLSON aka PATRICIA A. CARLSON Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of • Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 29; running thence north on • section line 381 feet; thence west 1168 feet, more or less to the east boundary of Sunset Highway; thence southeasterly along the east margin of Sunset Highway 384 • feet to the south line of said northeast quarter of the southeast y4 quarter; :1 thence east along said south line of the northeast quarter of thl r? southeast quarter 1121 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. O CD O CI a) • • dxY�tJ�+` �<ssceV� - •y ,y^ '23�swta•1red.• +N... O ^.i• t- _� -h.. l+Y :K+, .�^� lwxiG ��•:�H'. G_. '...f Xi .� .k y..SeS?!. '�''.a�i�-.'Ir.... . G .+�.T � �` S`�- ' . fir,.+. r,r .++ ° 1 ki.,gf^f, - t a14F 1'.s�9rM�'� .Y`ba, vyp F,. ryKrSrw kwrn-i �.,,1Mr f'x -:`; x �Y'c a ,`�1�;•Y�+ �wnn�q . L Y J • • PARCEL 44 JAMES L. MARENAKOS, as his separate estate Record Owner PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the north half of the north half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 12; • thence south O1°11'57" west,along the west line of Section 12, a 2 distance of 325.64 feet to the southwest corner of said subdivision; cr thence south 86°42'14" east a distance of 30.02 feet to the easterly • margin of 164th Avenue Southeast and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; :i) thence continuing south 86°42'14" east along the south line of said O subdivision, a distance of 1239.33 feet to the northwesterly margin c) of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company transmission line right of O way; 'd' thence north 49°12'42" east, along said northwesterly margin, a Cr) distance of 56.05 feet to the east line of said subdivision; thence north 01°21'09" east, along the east line of said subdivision, a distance of 179.07 feet; thence north 86°43'48" west a distance of 1281.47 feet to the easterly margin of 164th Avenue Southeast; • thence south O1°11'57" west along said margin a distance of 217.53 • feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;Xsaid parcel described consists of 6.361:4 acres. • • • • • •, Y PARCEL 64 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON, CLAYTON CARLSON, who also appears as JOHN CARLSON, and VIOLA I. BRADLEY, each as their separate estate; and the Heirs and Devisees of WILLIAM VERNON BRADLEY, who acquired title as W. V. BRADLEY, deceased Record Owners ISAAC COOPER and ALICE MARY McEACHERN and ALFRED HACKETT Reservation of coal and minerals • MATHILDA CORKLE - Reservation of coal and minerals UNKNOWN Unpaid creditors of the estate of William Vernon Bradley, deceased UNKNOWN Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Wayne C1 Carlson O UNKNOWN CD Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Eugene O Carlson UNKNOWN Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Clayton Carlson, also known as John Carlson VIOLA BRADLEY (as to the interest of the Estate of William Vernon Bradley by reason of a community property agreement with the deceased) 0. J. CARLSON and KELLY CARLSON Current taxpayer for property W. V. BRADLEY and VIOLA BRADLEY, husband and wife and OIVE J. CARLSON and MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and wife Agreement for easement for water pipe PATSY A. CARLSON, also known as PATRICIA A. CARLSON Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson' STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Gene Carlson, a/k/a Gene Carlsen STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES Lien against Wayne C. Carlson RAMM REMANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTING, INC. , Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, °c •#r,_. -.a�.•sti v"'s•r Y�. 'Agc 1 04 f' r? *..s'� "? :y. �sRS'g r[!,lY� 4.Mi'_ �+ •r-.1 `+. ) t y 7 „;t,f rr'i, L A y - e • s. individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene 1 ;. • Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson ( . NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. ; Judgment against Gene A. Carlson and Aravilla Carlson UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Three federal tax liens against Gene and Aravilla Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: •• Beginning at the southwest corner of Section 28, Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; . thence east 50 feet; thence north 3° west 812 feet; thence on a 12° curve to the left a distance of 148.03 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on the west line of said Section • which is 990 feet north of the southwest corner of said Section; • v4 thence south to the point of beginning. d' O LO O d' i I • • • I -..._.A :.:,�xxz::i,s..-tfaerwF?ttie.-.,,$"a+i M."�-s71:i!'.0'h. 'k+"zb""i^�:+ �.'• '1,0,�."-�^5 .�;�yY!�i^. ' , ',� 1 �•ri"i'�'�L... L �... i�e I i 1 iv • _Is • • • rr I/NO • a- a •__I.A7 • �W.�.�,:�. • di B Auq//SW PO' WAWA C 1 m ttlNf.fs /(W Al rIYJN/J/mJ (KN.N011,06. •�'^,. II N—IS • r,3-0, 'PM 1S W9f/ :71' i n (SAW/rt nn ©...— ..../•_. /tY.W/A_r/.a/.I/Y ' ._ S O _2t1rY_ ►i'.D I ' D fIr Itrlr�Nrs./rar 7'E. * 7/bY70 . I �� - r 1t` 0 I c D 1 y niarl(an nvJr jp -/;ry .tr....Ir1 ;•If ygyt J.wL YY1r.fY 0 A 1 r- fYfl/Y IIV VW i17 M'Ntl YL �•�ilmavr f� a a m 1"--,wulargYw NON JY�v /,a,xw., 48 • ./f q rk 451 t _ 1:y as a a , .cr•7 2t.1fs7.i,;:.- 0 • !it?D ? la- _:o s ilia y Nei A� ia:l ... = I a � �iz 1 n 4 • 1 f I 0 WNW C Y UMWC a tt .1 1 NA„M15.0.{ Y 1 A w •b I r11WKNA MJ/ !2 11✓!J 10 141 /JKJ MAN..Ot-A t WA Mt., h nnN J17)0 ~ do .20 N.LN n-4 y4 /Nao alaux,my I pvJ _ j"Iu..l M)"aw / ^;A. ... (ran Pt--. __+ .. I V9 ' 3 ZIP& ' rfl•AJX•*AA/SNOW S I°i —T flza -- 8: s° --I Zy1 n I00b619o5b aMAW WNJry N 1 LK3 R1N✓•1r-, '$30 CI I Al,�, 'i?I9 OWN NCNIANXIO I 5 NJ/O,J PYJ�.-•R 1Y/10»f a 54 IMJ7 JN/7.O l(ANt'DJ r - OTlf'."1 `a2 rh��r I Z �.y..Y.ltgpN_�. WM 2 Nor/Jr N I OMI•M Sit• N. ADIrNI 371/JS 4• L "1 l'.:wu/r tip: I IT7u '.I 4 QYtYN71'/ i` e. n(x( y • //0P ox XI I I A.O.a.NN '� y C �• 4 J 2 ,:.- I' r, 2k / gawp Iv �-.• A4IJJ.OIN l t .. I ^� a i mcjp Ia 0 ,g 0 a i i m 0 . t„�1 .w1r1/A. I s 8 <C<C S A ...c !NlW.�1 V G o Z a 1 • rYalii-f VW I JY MOW ` r0 .•,� }- •. - u'!u-••-- a IOI7.oJ,wuxlr -, `__µY_._ II ND __.d -,htl MAC.: A 0 „ /f r)Y/l/JIA(tJMYI(f IIA is wW/3T ,r/Ja --- -- /pjaM».•Arar■ •.ra, -� - IfYJwl tr7llJ rf7JYYMWJ N.IIX.NN 1110 ON / IAYYA'MJ/!' rl MI f. D 0 _ MONl N•41.N.IVN NON 70110X*WM / 2 IIlitrl:I 1%rl D Z D /W4/h.KY14Nw:LINN 6 ' % 0 :a - me mow ant-f OV '; 0 x 1aa 9506199001 € ? a • / II _ rye, c 4 . 62A =_ arx i , REFERENCES r PARCCLA: : r 22: T11E WEST HAI$OF TIIE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION I)Record of Survey by lone.end Associ.te.,recorded in Volume 7 of Survey;page 129. ' Z 2 14,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH.RANGE S EAST.WILLWAM/ETTE MERIDIAN.IN KING records of King County.Washington. F Z 11 y COUNTY,WASHINGTON;EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 300.00 2)Pia.of Cede Crest Estates recorded in Volume 93 of Phu,page S4,records of King Couory, LB g FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID _ SUBDIVISION;AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN TIIE EAST Washington y 0 3 5 . R 22300 FEET OF THE SOUTH 461.00 FEET OF THE NORTH061100 FEET OF SAID 3) Piet ofOriu Hills in Velum.Io0 of PW..page 3l,records of King Coswsy, 0 m a SUBDIVISION;AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KINGj COIINTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 63225)FOR SOUTIIEAST 12o III Washington. 0 0 STREET. 0 141 y 4) Record of Survey by Ken Oyler,recorded In Volume 71 of Surveys,pegs 211,records of T. PARCEL Br King County,Wuhlnpon. b THE EAST HALF OF PIE WEST IIALF OF TIIE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3) Record of Survey by Concept Engirseea,Inc.,Recorded In Volume 71 of Surveys page I, a • >F Z nerds of King County,Washington r v 14,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTII,RANGE 3 EAST,WILLIAMfETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING / V z COUNTY,WASBINOTON;EXCEPT TllS EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 6)Record of Survey by W t II Pacific recorded in Volume 92 of Survey.,pose 33,rcconds of / '> OF TIIE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;AND EXCEPT THE King County So Washington EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD;AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632231. 3...SURVEYOR'S NOTES O y9 • I) All Title InArmallon shown on IN,mop hes bun extracted Rom Chicago Title Insurance C) C`'''o Company Phu Cement«Commitment No.423111,dated April I I,1994 et 1 00 A .end .3 W wpphmand April IS,1995, d April II.1993.In preparing this map,DEI hes conducted ., nQ,jjg • no Independent Ill.search nor I.DEI aware of any title issues alFect;ore the surveyed property O ,� other dun MomhaMomshown on the map and disclosed by the«rcerced Phu Certificate O 1.The purpose of this survey Is to prapara Record of Survey la Bwnuud Commitment.DEI has reed wholly on Chicago Title Insurance Company representaf s of O xi--W Construction • the lithe condition to prepare thin coney and therefor.DEI qualifies the map s accuracy end Met W 2 N W completeness to et extent. V 2.Lot Nee a 2,732,731 t square feet(e2.73 t At.) S.This survey represents visible physical Improvement conditions.xlslhs9 on April 17, ]) This I.•Sold Irmo.survey A Lieu SET4C Five second combined demonic total nation project Agri was sired to meows the angular and diaunce relerionsldps between lb.controlling ) 1995.NI survey control Indicated el-found-was recovered for the ct In I monurnenuiron as shown Clown ratios of lb.Reverse met or acceded those 190010ed in 1995. WAC 332-130-090.Disarm Incoming equipment hes been calibreted,l en N.G.S-Baseline within one year of the due of this survey.4.This survey was prepared for Ile exdusNe use of Rumstead Construction Rights to 1 rely on or use Oslo survey do not extend to any unnamed party without express 4 t N recertification by Dodds Engineers,bsc.and/or the Professional Land Surveyor 3) Al)digancn are d fors. 4' h whose seal appears hereon W a 6 P fJ 4) All romancers shown u found were fide visited the week or April 17,199f. Q s le i w01 u ; ' Bn.),of Beerlem F f e 3 t N11 2T17'W between monument Nos 1131 end 1152.found in piece end described below per W?S F City of Renton horizon.]control network published November 13,1994. U T. 1J Q1_e _ Athrinrl Dienamrnll Q .I!s No.1151-1 h wr'domed bras, f ce disc w/ponds mark al the constructed intersection of N E. 0 :i 4th SI.(S.E.IIIIb Ss)end 140th Ave.S.E. W , 1 e a •:� No.1152-]'RU hoses f s surface disco the conswcted lnlusection of N.E.eth St.IS E.121th ; CI SI.)end 141th Av..S E. 3/1- 5l I G 4 f 1 1- t i FU __ I' - or" c Q ?� c '.r efit U - i 1ti o R L .S! _ . +.ii.n° 0' d 3 G • Q sa8 io 44; , HICAUU T 1 L INSURANCE URANCE COMUPA, °1'1 -wan Pp 03 ) 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 • PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: /t'li4J'cEu/voP Pg°PegTY In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval,this Company has examined the records of the County.Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FINER HOMES, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Apii?It 4 DEVELOPMENT P CITY OF REN PLANNING MAY 05 1999 RECEIVED EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED • CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $16.40 Records examined to APRIL 11, 1994 at 8:00 AM CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By h/40eal‘1714°1"--""."..."`""' CHRIS JOHANSON Title Officer 628-8377 PIATCRTA/12-590/EK JUCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. CHICAGO HILE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. • I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PLATCRTB/031694/ioe CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY dICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP) PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: ASSIGNMENT PURPOSE: ACCESS ROAD AREA AFFECTED: WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: MAY 5, 1960 RECORDING NUMBER: 5158814 B 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET OF PARCEL B RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170565 C 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET AND WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170566 D 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1995 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9017-04 LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 326,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $4,456.04 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $4,456.04 AFFECTS: PARCEL A CHICAGO 11 I LE INSURANCE COMPANY •'�•.• Jo 7 - 4'�''',.r • 1111111mPlOuret N� bNALMrM til/OfixRol YAP Rftweo rp reotn VW. T®ed for Record at Request of 7' . o • y AFTER RECORDING MAIL TOt ii:( PINER 2Ztl INC 14150 N.E. 21at Place t Bellevue. Wa 8007 •;v E NO EXC TAX cc) r ti 78-127 0. = MAR g 1983 zt • . n _ G!1• 710 )/9 •sue 1,i'- i Statutory 'chastity Dimod II mu GRANTORS JOHN H. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON, husband and wife for sad b rese dsratis sr Fulfillment of R•jal Estate contract P `hrod pist eoaorre had aerraw r FINER HONES, INC., a Washington Corporation •.r, ' -,. the kiewied described rest Wasbi i a: estate,abased V the Casty.f KING . • s ar'e1 it :• • The East one-half of the West one-half of the Northwest quarter • of Section 14, Township North, Range 5 East, W.H.; '' EXCEPT the East one-half 2of the Noheast quarter of the northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter; and • EXCEPT the East 30 feet of said premises conveyed to King County for road; and EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Causeit f. No. 632233. y'- SUBJECT TO: Easement for water mains as recorded in Auditor's fil 4 File No. 7507170565. This deed Is gives Is fulfillment of that certain real estate eostraot betweet the parties borse*. dated JANUARY 5, • is 79 • and eoaditiosed tor the coeveyasce of the sbon described property,aid the is of warranty herein ecataised shall sot a1 Interest or•icsebraace arisingD pptt, to hay float apply to any gayer y.throes\or seder th• arohaser Is said +were+ sad shall oat � :'6 meats or other charges levied, assessed K becoming due subs to the date of said coat/act. Sarni g•ac. Excise Tax ors Pala cot this ais or eta I •■.yc ow January 11, 1979. a.•. No. I i Dated this 5bir ?di.f y day of JANUARY 44179 /7,3 STATZ OF W ASHfNGTCPi •••••"�� d Ira mac) � ---�� a Pic72cE • a tha.Amy Porky appeared bef0r'e ear JOHN N. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON to roe Warr' to be the ktdlaWsd described is ay whit asserted the wields and acknowledged thst they rigged the awes ae ��o� '• their tees and porpoees hhsesia mattoasl free sad act sad deed e!! G1YIN seder ay Wad cad'Adel wet this der ii J .y /9 P 3 H«., f w«.e WreY,lse., y i reatltY r +• ..•-4..►.n':..:. ,-.4.41,JIromck••-•-z-.'t„m,t•;rte ,e r9tnK'r+k.l.L.ai•...,r+i,. .r-w.R-.,..............^-rw•.•.1..F''"..n,.... In,.a;.....i..w,r<...<. .) T(e1188R1®I108 Tra' r ss TItio Insurance Company TNtg SPACE/ROWDEO FOR P[L0f10lR1 Mt{( i TRIe Insurance Services • FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF 3' l O 7 i-� WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO i P -0iyfJe+1�,..(� ,97 t-e.l_._. .. .... ._ ...... �rAlfS TAX PAID ON CONTRACT AFF ND.F•��OZ��s�: e= 0 ,,�,/ KING CO.RECORDS DIVISION address P U �E�� P t �2r DIPIJTY ti 0 cuh,6tat.,zip.l.4..C.C�l`--e-- lrt e'.-- ..5/ J'0 0 7 i 00 427101 2 Statutory Warranty Deed (41)' , THE GRANTOR REC BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate -% J and ROY BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate � 44 for and in consideration of $10.00 and other valuable considerations in hand paid,conveys and warrants to FINER IiOMES, INCORPORATED ' •••' the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of Washington: The West half of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range S East W.M.; .,.},+``> EXCEPT that portion thereof of the North 500.00 feet lying East of the • j : 0 „.xr_•_ •,. East line of the West 30 feet of said subdivision; i Y, r* AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within the East 225.00 feet of the I '; s.,... ,.k:,•:-i South 468.00 feet of the North 968.00 feet of said subdivision; ``'` "`'` `~ AND EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court '''' yt Cause No. 632253 for S.E. 128th Street. Y • R• Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ., .,,,.a , �,:..4.� ,, h SUBJECT•TO: Easement for road under Recording No. 5158814; Right to make ";.+•••1• ..•,:: • necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as ' '• condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233. 1 , e�.,� t This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto,dated March 14, ,1978 ,and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property,and the covenant,of warranty .'•.F`` ''t',- herein contained shall not apply to any title,interest or encumbrance arising by,through or under the purchaser in said contract,and >'•- shall not apply to any taxes•assessments or other charges levied,assessed or becoming due subsequent to the date of said contract i 6' A .; f ::• Real Estate Sales Tax was paid on this sale on 3 - -e- 7 S' ,Rec.No. '/S t Ltr ;f- March 14 .1978 xr 1 TLe -BaZ Ott lestrasse _ ,tFrE•of :On l -Conveyance= �-il..t- ; . ; F ' ��.�� =•_ 1 tom~ H. Tit -• i 4 & E�e rasse _ ,a. DL015901 Q._ _, .t1 3t � *Eve NUE � •-' P S,10!113 � ' t STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE- • 4'. - i., li . ., COUNTY OF...Xing COUNTY OF ) w I :.` dayof 19 (s t day personally appearedta before me this Rex 11d��e3traSSe n before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash• , .�e personallyappeared ... �x...'. Rp]F...,Bd�.,lBStraSSe ington,duly commissioned and sworn. PPc' �i'+ .•. .� � to me known to be the individual described in and t ft7t who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and . ,r t r !f- ,. and acknowledged that they...signed the same to me known to be the President and Secretary, „•,:• `.+' as their...free and voluntary act and deed, respectively,of ''•""' . for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. the .".rporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged r;.f • the said instrument to he the free and voluntary act and deed of said torpor- •' .t anon,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that St ...,, authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal :: - �, G1,VEN under my hand and official seal this affixed is the corporate seal of said cor{wration first • • -(a( _ , hand and official seal hereto affixed the day year.^�.. ,i _ �! day ol..._.._............MdSCh 19..Z8. above written. y . ,2e . � . a_. ._o. L ..Wash _....._........... .P, j' Notary Public in and for the late of Wash- Notary Public in and for the Stale of Washington, - „ , ,..Eton,residing at.....ientw residing at. rt. 1 I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY O 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 /`rAPL.woap PnaPEier Order No.: 423888 Your No.: . Loan No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/11/94 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH FOUR OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAVE BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: PARAGRAPH NUMBER 8: CHICAGO 1'11LE INSURANCE COMPANY SUNLCOM/I1.2-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 Your No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) 1. RIGHTS OF KING COUNTY AND OF THE PUBLIC AS TO A RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, AS DISCLOSED BY THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSOR'S MAP SHOWS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, WE FIND NO DEED TO KING COUNTY FOR SAID PREMISES AND THE CONDEMNATION ACTION HAD UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 DOES NOT INCLUDE SAID, PREMISES. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER SINCE THE PLAT CERTIFICATE DEATED APRIL 11, 1995, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. APRIL 13, 1995 AUTHORIZED BY: CHRISTOPHER W. JOHANSON • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPLCOM2/11-2-90/EK , - - - •_r __ .,.__.7 t.•7 FOR h.NG COUNTY I. 1 - �.•� C ' r, a le a subdivi sion bdivi ion 1 S :;7•1, y' of the State o" Washington, ! �) } 2 C } 4 1. d m- it:- ..: .. :J L., cl•c .. -_ _. e . a.,_ , 1� �^.} ) 7 �1y}��, 1T _+,.. `oill e._.... . .S Son q t �?, _— -_._- _...____! (� _ In hi ,• k {; 1. _ r'S ned ryj •. "i+1 1i J i'u`Li 1:,� i'it3 1'lw C1J'3 O^ Gil. i li:C. _ _ __ .L� before t: ,. d 4',0'+0.}il f� ��^. mot~;�•� r t tf'q � , t ..o! _? decree o %: i}"`o U:"_.at.io^t .'., ;nn!; iceo 'Rv.; 5.CV.Jo("+.,Y'•?.v,9t:.s"L.iG >' i' k't Charles 0.. Carroll, F :/7;^ecu ._ Attorney ;or !'.•:13 Co t.Y - tyt `• '' hrolii :i A,)o t- .r'�.°o(}^.�•°t r>uva-na, and hie ot?.loner having + •mod t.o • �� ,.G` �i G) C1; i tJ1 : i! rp: 1n ?t]t" provided .' this 3uBtmen��of ,,1 � . „S.. it . ` 117; 1`7ot1 t r,. thecourt) f More d o1 :t: :i..r . t;Le.2-,A +'`� ^. 1 ?p:,log: „ • '--. , :i1 3U, thi'. ..., :d -h.oiX'C:)1- beln 'o:cs ibod lit ,. ,., `` ...,.1 „` t,�;:ex <<:i ir_i orvst for 6x�rT 3`.• 0t,04 } '^ram t ;os�`.. i' s des:,^_; :v''.'2;.+M'Jn :7 .hibit " ttached _er eto bs and hereby ' s +' • s• �, l x is, ancr:);�r�ated find conve;,:ed to the 7!e;;;.t .yner in tee real property 4,,' ' 7._. ._"'7:' in w :*z:i bi is n-1, 3_1 1 , 3-14, 5-19, 3. 0, attached hereto, �t'q!1 \J ...:1tl.�:^. .:1 _n ....nc•-.. County, Washington;on; :±:1•� • Mr.1r 4sa . _T , ... _ f^✓ - " y- GED ND D CREED that tac pe ttitioner -� ��s v '._ :I Z1':?. 1 l7.e 1iS. L7I LzYiL. tLi1 ,. 1E r , *, . tho o:mor for .road purposes in the parcels of real property, and is r' i44 14T.d. 1 L a_, y , j r wn au all ti''es hereafter use and y, �t4 41 en �e d .o enter into possess on of, d 4i :a',. .C. real :� "t7^"' ' tC� ��.n^'". F1? TJq`^tl'33 '�nf1n'TI and. uTt'{nOWn. µG t3rsb i,14 i, ,� t,'••? :� r:Ctt::�r' �._.... - ,'Y.`yt-n �la� o+�' ;�*•,..C.il ltlo!`. ' scV", ip j 91 • yti r.r , I..,L/ 1_. ,;,,ytxt X• ; � tJ ;a�G E : r. FI. C4'�of � / `•ti .. S. 1.. i'Fi \l 74{y 45 , F•ff 413(l1)'•�'r Fytl 3 ,I ,'\ ?A4'4 ri` 1,1" ; .,l--t, L 'S°i.. .. - - , 1 y.°`' OO poputy Prosecut,ins. Attorney ,117 1, O e t;::C;rneyV1 forpetitioner Ar \ " riff ,)(� , )'fie .. S C .1 �t ii NO. 28984 11h fii, ac ;,' ;fl lRE'AS, the Board of County Commissioners of King County have iA determined it to be necessary to ?cqu",re the land and property here- 'A ina_fto; described for the uubwi.- purpose of county road rights-of- ` way, to-wit: t S .E.. . 1?��th Street ( 132nd Ave .�• . S.E. to i:� L=n Ave. S.E. ) 41 ITHE EAS, it appears that King County is unable tp agree wki ith Jam- the owners of said land and property for it'=, purchase and must resort _, to condemnation proceedinr,s to acquire see as provided by law, now 1. I therefore BE TT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of King ICounty, Washington, that t the Prosecuting Attorney of King County be and is hereby authorized and directed to begin condemnation proceed- _ '• ings to acquire property and property ri r is together with rights to construct and maintain slopes for cuts and fills on certain abutting properT,y on and of the following described property in Nirg County ;; S . E. 128 th. Street ( 132nd Ave . S.E. to 168 th Ave. S.E. ) A',... A s triw of land Fii: feet in 'ai dth, hav ng I{2 fee: of such width i,lil ono c S' `1 oft%'e fOilewing deacribeti', centerline : p !. Beginning at the Northwest corner of Sac. 15, Twp. 23 N.R. 5 E.W.M.. , thence Easterly a distance of 11,727.00 feet to ' q a terminus at a point on the centerline of 158th Ave S.E. , said point being N. 72°51'388" East a distance of 32.17 .feet ;';nor.: the igortheast corner of the N'.'' '.4 of the N.W,h of Sec. �, •3 23 E.W.M. „ g .Two., .- •i. R. 5 � . PASSED tha.is:2:3rd day of November 19 -. " BOARD OF COUNTY COIreaSSI ONERS , 3 uL _ . tis- ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • • .x ATTEST: ED MUNRO ROBERT A. i3i RIS Chairman . Clerk of the Board . SCOT'T WALLACE BY RA3''ia R. STE►�°D .�i Commis 3aoner .n..,.�.., ,TO C, T, O'BRlEN i t, mm .ssz.oner ...? .,iI)N'XI IT A ,.. A„,, ...... 41 .. • .trik I '.4. .'"';-') . •TV . .. ,... , .. •'It., i • I 1 1 I . "it ..,.. :,< •' . .- ,! , 'I. . `........ .. .:*.... .. .)`.• .. . • .. . ,. 4_,4, . ,..,4. th ' ,i " ' .,••- ' ' `2'.....: 'i4 t.::,.. . :1:', s• .. ,-- - . n 7• ... ,- f r'aid I *::":1•' :1, . 1.1•.„.,'. ,. •••••• • •••• • -- ' , ,,.., -•• ., •••. -. . 1,, I.,,-ist ...:•,.1 ..00,•• 0- .' 1 il'....1.;''' •''''' ' . tit.' t ..-.... 1;,:,•'''.:-`.*.i*..`11t- .- • •,.. , . .,...., .... ..c: Ir., r:01,,,t.,. lloar.i; sit_uate .1 I'',.•*111.;•-‘1; Con•c".. ;• _, .1 ' .1"' ..:. .- • •‘• .1.-• f".: : .1:1111:.4...,Sr i. .:•• 1 ., I I ...' Own.lr. , I " . 2' '''4 I * ;133)'1300 :S.. Au,; „ ,..c.1.1' .1 ;,...,... t.. ,t.. •,. #33); 1 ...501 1 John ii. SaLndon and : ;no,' Saindon, h:ls wife. 1 i Own.arf.; -,•s 1 t: .3? 1 -.-.-0(") r- .,.... , ) t 1 #33;i11: 01. 4 1 . '44-1 .11 )1.g) ;...51.; 1•,;s ,.., '•..1! rfl .$.' ,,.., 4,40„ 1 , 1' ; $ ...,t 451 . . 1 t r3 `'. . 11:x1t.i bi t i'1.-31,) % KING C s11,y'1'Y. n Iowa subdivision ) of the :;t.rtte of Washington, ) • NO. 0 3 2 2 3 3 Petitioner, ) DECREE OF APPROPRIATION vs . ) PARCEL NO. 28 APTEX, :_NC. , et al, ) Respondents . ) TIES MATTER having come on duly and regularly before t 'ur rs rec3 ,Judge for. a decree of appropriation pursuant to RCW 8.08.0o tiro er 4 appearing by Charles 0. Carroll . Prosecuting Attorney for Kit Cc)• mty, through his deputy, Robert Kuvar2, and the petitioner having paidnto the rogi.n try of the court; the compensation provided in thin judpnont Y KY•/,r t upon s w1 entered on March E.S , 1965 for parcel. #28, the said 1 parcel being described below NOW, 'I'IIEln!:vOItE, IT IS ORDEREU, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that an ownership interest for road purposes as described in Zxhib:it "A" attached hereto be, and hereby is , appropriated and conveyed to the petitioner in the real property described in Exhibit "B-28", attached hereto, situate in King County, Washington; and IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petitioner is the owner for road purposes in the parcels of real property, and is entitled to enter into possession of, and at all times hereafter use and Possess, 3atd x ea.l yproperty as n.N;n.: net all p::trtios known and unknown.. DON IN OPEN COURT thins th day of March 1965. ::'' 6l i� G it • .Presented by: t, ... Deputy Pi^o:ior_aatrinl �,At:Giarnrsy Of—at to rim yz for pat►t•!onor , • A4 R is S L L U '1 I 0 .. ;Ltl' car:.. "� ..!HJ e ? �• County A t" icy .lr y e ,, :c::t :t1 �, the... iaaa^c, o� �Uu;lt.� Cr a;. I;i:;t.> County iiav y.° determined it to be nc)cesnary to acc ''i.re 'the land and property her e- 44. in::ti ttir• described for the public pur'i?o::t'+ of county road rights-of- , way, to-wit : 'N•i.t T' t.r.'U tit It:'u,+ {; ( .t 't1A:3 Ave . 0 :43t }t Ave . :i.r.. u '1 . HERE•AS, it appears that hint-, County is unable to a r•oe w.i th the owners of said land end propert;y t•or it ' s purchase and mint resort 44, a to �onden naL,in proceedings to acquire same es provided by la w, now sH therefore BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of King County, '•'ashi.ngt;on, that the Prosecuting Attorney of Icing County be Wd Wd and is hereby authorized and directed to begin condemnation proceed- ;,; .i.ngs to acquire property and property t:y rl a hts together ther with rights to t construct and maintain slopes for cuts and fil,:it; on certain abutting , property on and of the following described property in King County it AA , S. E. 128th Street ( 132nd Ave . S.E. to 168thAve. S.E. ) zest 40, A strip of land 84 foot in width, having !42 .fent of such width 10, on each side of the following described centerline : r Bog ..nning at the Northwest corner of Sec . 15, Twp. 23 N.R. 5 E..W.M. , thence Easterly a distance of 11,727.00 feet to a terminus at a point on the centerline of 168th Ave . S.E. , ', ' said point being N. 72°51 '.8" East a distance of 32. 17 feet from the Northeast corner of the N.:'1.' of the N.W.4 of Sec . 13, Twp. 23 N. R. 5 E.W.M.4 t::, PASSED this .23rd day of November 1954. uA: ry. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'iISSIONE RS KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • �y{4 o r F ATTEST: ED MUNRO ;.f: ROI3L':R`i' A. MOHR: :i Chairman vf: Clerk of the Board �¢tA t F. SCOTT WALLACE BY RALPH R. STENDER Commissioner r 4;: • Deputy 'TORN T. O'BRIEt} J : ,--,,. ._;.;.. ., ._.. Commissioner 1'r i - - �i •.r ";: Description ,127, N of t of the 'lest t i. ofe �,� The North 500 feet the 'Test ,z ��:s � ti the Northwest -':; of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East :I.i'i. ; EXCEPT the East 225 feet; EXCEPT the 'Jest 30 feet; AND EXCEPT County Road; situate in the County of King, State of :•lashington. Nels Swanson and Gladys Swanson, it his wife Owners Auditor ' s File r4585538 '.later District No. 90, Utilities Local Improvement District No . 2 ULID Assessment No. 2 • • t ;a Exhibit '.3-28 srr,� � �� or ti ' 4 t�k� '�`.:.1.0 s7 S,,e,c .C',,g1--..., � }.r; ;' !r-*N'`•� .N �� j�rC TM'h,'�i 4,�.w`"rt�'w'*n5 ;;t'l'd`.`��.xy r s i t it! t,_, � r4 ah rki ,5 - "'g�r.e'ti>�`4 .-r e a tc .� ry�ry4.� '�'Xx e'i,♦` I, q 't F q--a`�,#jr 7.� .+r §�r� 4 r(.� .,,` 3 .h M � ��ern r w+•. Y.�r rLt^i't.xrr�„� +'R.._ '4.' 31 �. !"k '1.7 kr,. t.r �',�'"ir i.� a �r c... ' ,,1..x, ) L . r,,,,.;.• i.,�1� .r . ?ri.'�; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY O 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 423888 Your No.: MAPLEWOOD Loan No.: Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #2 ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 2 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/11/94 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 7 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175, AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR THE CEDAR RIVER TO LAKE SAMMAMISH TRAIL PROJECT. SAID ORDINANCE IS ATTACHED TO A NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9409060421. ALTHOUGH THE LIS PENDENS DOES NOT NAME FINER HOMES, INC. OR BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. AS A RESPONDENT, THE ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN SAID LIS PENDENS IS THAT OF THE ORDINANCE, WHICH DOES DESCRIBE THE REAL ESTATE UNDER SEARCH AS WELL AS OTHER PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS NOT SUBJECT TO CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175 IMPLIES THAT SAID PREMISES MAY BE - BROUGHT INTO THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT A LATER DATE. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER SINCE SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1, DATED APRIL 13, 1995, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. APRIL 18, 1995 AUTHORIZED BY: CHRISTOPHER W. JOHANSON CHICAGO I ritE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/114-90/EK ' CHICAGO TITLr, INSURANCE COMPANY © 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 T 5 H AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 423888 YOUR NO: MAPLEWOOD UNIT NO: 10 LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT AC ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTALNUMBER1 OF THE SECOND CERTIFICATE SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 02/24/99 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: AD THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE FEBRUARY 24, 1999, DATE OF THE SECOND CERTIFICATE. AZ APRIL 23, 1999 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS A? NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION RON HUGHES 1/1 DODDS ENGINEERING KEVIN 1/1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/RDA/0399 rii ttlJV 111i IIN U -u''.l;t_Anviri 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SECOND CERTIFICATE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: MAPLELEAF In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FINER HOMES, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $2 0 0.0 0 TAX: $16 .40 Records examined to FEBRUARY 24, 1999 at 8:00 AM CHICAGO IfrLE INSURANCE COMPANY By � (72.14. MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 PLATCRTA/12-5-90/EK r111.t1VV 111LI✓11VJ 11-/1<t11Y 1_.D 1.V1Vlr t' • Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 500.00 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 225.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 468.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 968.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 FOR SOUTHEAST 128TH STREET. PARCEL B: THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 423888 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PIATCRTB/031694/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: ASSIGNMENT PURPOSE: ACCESS ROAD AREA AFFECTED: WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: MAY 5, 1960 RECORDING NUMBER: 5158814 a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET OF PARCEL B RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170565 c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET AND WEST 30 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: JULY 17, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507170566 v 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9606210966, REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND CONNECTION CHARGES THERETO. v 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9017-04 LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 371,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 4, 990.24 CHICAGO lIIZE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 4,990.24 AFFECTS: PARCEL A 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9005-08 LEVY CODE: 4350 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 273,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,673 .42 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,673 .42 AFFECTS: A SOUTHERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SAID TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER FAILS TO EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET. x 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9004-09 LEVY CODE: 6867 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 242,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,483 .95 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,483 .95 AFFECTS: THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SAID TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER FAILS TO EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET. CHICAGO 1'11LE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPi PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 423888 SCHEDULE B (Continued) AA 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175, AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR THE CEDAR RIVER TO LAKE SAMMAMISH TRAIL PROJECT. SAID ORDINANCE IS ATTACHED TO A NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9409060421. ALTHOUGH THE LIS PENDENS DOES NOT NAME FINER HOMES, INC. OR BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION CO. AS A RESPONDENT, THE ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN SAID LIS PENDENS IS THAT OF THE ORDINANCE, WHICH DOES DESCRIBE THE REAL ESTATE UNDER SEARCH AS WELL AS OTHER PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS NOT SUBJECT TO CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER ORDINANCE NUMBER 11175 IMPLIES THAT SAID PREMISES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AT A LATER DATE. rt 9. RIGHTS OF KING COUNTY AND OF THE PUBLIC AS TO A RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, AS DISCLOSED BY THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSOR'S MAP SHOWS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET OVER THE NORTH 42 FEET OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, WE FIND NO DEED TO KING COUNTY FOR SAID PREMISES AND THE CONDEMNATION ACTION HAD UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233 DOES NOT INCLUDE SAID PREMISES. z 10. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9506199001, AS FOLLOWS: A. ENCROACHMENT OF A CHAIN LINK FENCE AND A BARB WIRE FENCE, APPURTENANT TO PARCEL B INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 128TH ST. B. ENCROACHMENT OF A HOG WIRE/BARB WIRE FENCE, APPURTENANT TO A NORTHERLY ADJOINER, ONTO A NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A. C. ENCROACHMENT OF A BARB WIRE FENCE, OWNERSHIP UNDETERMINED, ONTO A NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A. AB NOTE NUMBER: 1 THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PTN W 1/2, NW 1/4, 14-23-5. END OF SCHEDULE B CHICAGO I I I'LE INSURANCE COMPANY • 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon.1 J l01 S.C. 123TH. ST, 2 I2 _ • • is cn • I I it j � N I . • I I_ I, I;4 - • to i• it NO? •0-n w= (M!1 ' ,°-, — -... _. _ oe* ;s w++..rlr,q.S,,,.,,�.,.�,,.— r yf F f: '" '4;-�::, r'�ff`+a•y +seA" .ey.1„•.,r • a dip PIONEEp NATIONAL t,J(o 0 7)-/ iv. - TITLE wows IMAM }�. r.ei i►Kt anewvo roe s cototrs vst f Fy - "r A TIM*CpM.Atry . Filed for Record at Request of v ) I { AFTER RECORflI11G MiA1L Tilt • FINER HOMES. INC. ' 14150 N.E. 21st Place t Bellevue Wa 98007 NOara` `rrnx co N78-127 � �y g�•y ��3 DD -A A ...,.�+�.«�-�.e.�•n-....M,.A.®•a„ �•---_.-.—r...—....., ... „IL,,a� .e.�7 iy°.6{ 3 .'Y, 't�"` ig t. • yk -�--. ...,iixn,.r-:cwmav,•w•.•m.a.. ��))) �r..a...eo..+».w��• 'R��.A�'k a. ....az.,ev..•...,..•,....,f....z..-.=nine.r.m-.m..+.nnn•naexrn..4/7i„:,,, .m+n+u� lffi t�'T' ,�` GA G'. +a+. /Y .i =�R i! m Statutory ty °` l av>a t THE GRANTORS JOHN M. SAINDON AND AGNES SAINDON, husband and wife # is and h cardderatlee a( Fulfillment of R,al Estate contract le head paid,cwwys and warrants bpFINER HCHES, INC., a Washington Corporation r` s`.. WitfOpe*�f dacrBed Nei estate,attaated lam the Cofy ofKING e . .Bonne of ,„ i.„f-r4 `- The East one-half of the West one-half of the Northwest quarter .' of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; EXCEPT the East one-half of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter; and EXCEPT the East 30 feet of said premises conveyed to King County for road; and EXCEPT that portion condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233. rii SUBJECT TO: Easement for water mains as recorded in Auditor's File No. 7507170565. This deed is girlie la fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto. dated JANUARY 5, , lb 79 , and cosdltloied for the eosveyance of the above described property.aad the coveaaste of warranty berets ccstalsed shall sot apply to any title. Interest or encumbrance arising by,through or wader the purchaser is said eostract, aid shall sot apply to any tares, meats or other charges levied. asssessd or becoming doe eubaepuait j to the date of said contract. , Rail to tote tic lay Tax was paid on this sal• or •tanned a t January on 11, 1979. a.o• Ito. fff "-555 i Dated this -5 kb-/9t/t. day of JANUARY 4479 /9,5'3 �}1d don. •-Sain«� aeliedf,e., lean STATE OF WASl1iNCTON, Agirtdon 1 t Cosh oft . //t7�GE y Os a• Dys before e me JOHN M. SAINDON AND ACHES SAINDON + ". acknowledged to me bows to be the individual deeaibed in Lad whe smarted the within and that they PIP"the seine ae !ongoing and ems and purposes rherdn ses-ismed, their bee and voFkrttary act mad lord, for the , GIVEN miler wry hand sadedictal ease this / c/- day d J /913 Weil4f...1 % ./1-77k-/i-J I i- meat/r may, , �r 4 .4.- siP'}` W m. ts�w ' i�ewwt, ioi ' /7r. Yam _ 1 `tom fir' F•., � �'+�. s + . Tranaamer'.oa A T l'rensamenoa T1"Insurance CNmpanr THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE: Title Insurance Services • .1a FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF _, 1 .1 3 -< << �G WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO r-1 N,o,e , 1;Pl C,..�� , lr L/-_— y1LES iA1t PNO ON CONTRACT AFT NO. S tn Cn /ypl P'U - 4/Eo7/ ^. KING CO.RECORDS DIVISION Address - V �O L- 2� ,DEPUTY i 1 CSZ o car.sl.te,zip 1:`� Sl'�, CC/ / 0 5- 427101 Statutory Warranty Deed ry THE GRANTOR REX BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate ��% y "�. and ROY BALLESTRASSE, as his separate estate �1 ,Q X' for and in consideration of $10.00 and other valuable considerations In hand paid,conveys and warrants to FINER HOMES, INCORPORATED the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of Washington: € The West half of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Sectlon 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.; k� EXCEPT that portion thereof of the North 500.00 feet lying East of the t ; ` ' "t ` ', East line of the West 30 feet of said subdivision; V'�,P.�f`: , AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within the East 225.00 feet of tte aa "t,- y South 468.00 feet of the North 968.00 feet of said subdivision; , .:.44';, "�'_"•--' ,' AND EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court �:"' ti t4 Cause No. 632253 for S.E. 128th Street. e�y - :".1 Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 3 >• ` ' ^4 S. SUBJECT TO: Easement for road under Recording No. 5158814; Right to make ':? ) zi'' necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as ♦ ,,x+`t;: condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 632233. .t '.'''Ai,' ' . n This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto,dated March 14, f ' gAt• Iv `1: ,i978 ,and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property,and the covenants of warranty S ,- $ herein contained shall not apply to any title,interest or encumbrance arising by,through or under the purchaser in said contract,and tom: c.•,' shall not apply to any taxes,assessments or other charges levied,assessed or becoming due subsequent to the date of saidcontract 'Cr' �r yk•', C 3 _�.o-7S' ,Rec.No. V/.SV/S t:•if- .. s";i:�V�y-� Real Estate Sales Tax was paid on this sale on fRV� t i 'e 1. Dated March 14 . .1978. p . m on ce` 9,_✓ ;:: ; .,�TATb o veya� ----i 1."' :.!,,.;.-Vie,: ��`B�lestrasse t a{(j " �C -� I i {T{ `N r{!liv.:i''�•a eVraileete------erasse .o DEPT.OF F t of -it' J 9 V :11 �,/ a), yy*t },•: .i 1EVENUE� t�� rte.Ill 89 t !(. 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) STATE, # t1 , ;; > ,•F11-u'te -}S 4r J1 as. '1 COUNTY OF_King COUNTY OF......_.. - »....._._.._ I of Ws day personally appeared before me On this day of 19 Rex railest rasse an before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash• ` g' r?"y, `r :.. '. Rp3r...Ba11estrasse ington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared (g. {,'.V45'; ,,4-. ". to me known to be the individual described in and 4t'r `"-.:-"::14(;,',.,.',-.._ who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and ga sPresident and Secretary, ,-, , • and acknowledged that they...signed the same to me known to be the ' £j as.....their...free and voluntary act and deed, respectively,of for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. the !•,rporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged � the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpor- •es `' ,"Y ation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that . i z authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal t GI.VEN under my hand and official seal this affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. k+ ' /7 day of March is•78 aboveWitness written.my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first . Gblic in and I L.t the to Notary Public in end for fate of Wash Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, s44.,, 1 i..gton,residing at.....ISR'flt residing at..........__._.._.............._......_.._......_,....._._..., Perm No,W-ssl Res.4-is r ' fat S. . ,.1.. }..,�..w., a fin r . - 1 ,r 70' - . rw, y , _ . 5,,, , 'ih v , " •qr-..,e'$' ii75 Faa479L s 6: S ,. .y • r. ,,..,. _ - F,' ' . 4tif.IPX14,-'4,:cgar:AJ,.6.1.,-,- ',.-:,.' � S t 101411310011 sorpOra. r . s sL'C'.3+ ' Sr,.. p ' v, '** segsratisas, and Jf tb* laws V' f 0 ; , f ter Na 11* epriderati*u of `,f f x; r k �r '* �i ' is �� anQ Ot 14 TER DOLLARS ( •I ''' to 1 � 7 . a other geed 1 1r M serej*117 assign - 4 2 p..�1 F ` a b ,' f and tranate� I,' • *. A $ty,CI, and WILLIS R. !AARTIL, d/b/a i. ai..o.°,t1r3Nr nights and inter- • sets in and under that Asia 1aasi dated &us 13. 1956, b7 gad b•- twsan 11131 Ifl2o! !'OaR11T, Ulmer, and aromas BROADCASTING • COf4L?D•, EIAT i t 11 ., end 13 ! J. MIER, - r Losssss, ssesrims > lasslilid real estate situate in zing Ova t7, Wail hant, - IMP ]�r� `fief! of Ot Ulf (Y th- Q t of tba Sou North, Range �. . vast Qrtlaster ( tr Sorties lwn� 3 - -5 1.11.L less the last 30 foot &boded is zing County, Wash- , • ingtoa,, for road, SE.. • Tolman with an oases e t aT and woes the Yost 30 fast at the last gnaater OM) Of said bastion 14 for i 4 'coos' road. 1 • WAITER X. IMMO, Dom. 1. ANDIRSO%, and WILLIS X. EARTYL, d/b/a 3,1ATTU! NO1110451112, ***opt the aforesaid assignment - and transfer and awe to assess and samara the sblixatLists of irranixa BR ADOAS?IIa CORPORA/IOW, mit= Ds117AL dim, tIC., and ULM J. SLIDER under suit Leas* arising or smarming on and attar the effective date of this instrument. The nndar s igned ass lane s of that certain Leos dated •,t k •s. E 1. Jun. 13, 1956 b77 and bstwoan llll35?? IITTSTKENT CCI(PAIT, Lessor, '� l '-r and IIT LLU BROADOAbfIXO C01J0SATIOI, SEAM/ REVIVAL °INTER, s"�'• ',, • roc. and RAI?H J. SAEDl1, Losearss, do hereby aswore tbs foregoing - d , F Assignment in accordance with its tongs and hereby agree that no 4: 4' � ::0 further assignment of said Lease shall bs made without the consent of Lessor. 1, s� � This instrument shall speak and be effective as of the c. date it ie delivered to the said WALTER N. NELSLOQ, DARRELL R. +: ' ANDERSON, and WILL IS R. BARTEL, d/b/a 3EATTLZ MTSICABURS. II WITNESS WHERICNr, the aforesaid assignors have executed this instrument this 2,6'day of Dsoesber, 1958. 1 j/ i�JAD0A4 3O CORPORATIONj s_: A ATTEST: / 10( ' r •, 1 ` 61 mint -. Soo rotary , - ..I.... - :. ,. ` I )L .-to. ,,S ✓is'!,htd (... r ,ti. r, .i VO � ( f 4f1_ 4 ; "I64 .An''' 4 w C,=. i , i r , r , 'a`f f t . w yn Y {* Y � w x d , rot y ; r , ...it,. ii‘..."4,1 , , - • �-er!.. • •yt 2 r 2 . .,.t Y,p1 4 4 +af ! f t y • �� r7.T x• i 7 fan r � rr'd�...11�' I . .is r •.,• � y, ('} tf f y .'may. . �l �S • t f f yV 4b ) yam• Aillisits _ yes #-; , a, i^.,:4';- iy +� �..r,Q..r fiAA.L r , ..y. ,i •.>� �y,'1rr ;at/` },4- • sy 5 0 L.,�jo 4. ; ''4',n,. h•:r it‘:'''.}`,* �yj: j , w_ !J �r f� t t a .+R,r ^5. } .,., x LI • • t / / \ - t , w+.�-r... .in • i c PLOW IIITBSYMIlif Olaf ' . N tai• ater**a-14 ssiliv4- sent and taaftsfor aM MIMI 1. MILiK21 DARRZz.i. all rightsi?and WriZird _` "'. �� itllii �r1►31`t i�fZyYAL± i ' ' fit. a hill •+ C '1.RR, I. and LLI Zi': limas, Baia � with to the r - optida at first r fMat. a. tantk lajprpi�►lle•..:(Pat� ,J tbe,.ef. c.. It is m4tstsad that . L . the Lessor does net ?slurs L bO. 1/ rr a tN., ? 1 lam= 04VJIT • ,'. tilyin 4: - i' t7q 1a1 :' • "t }yak,; � lady .9 .' •,•"f r- - 'W & :ea a -- D1 WITYBss wILERZ07, the aforesaid assigns* has azeoutad this instrument this day ed De**aeber, 1958. tt)%19,..4;1110CA(ACQ__ :/_....... .................."-- ----&k_ A ./44e -i(e - I. twsICAs a )1 STATE 0p WA,SRINDTt4ll ) , .t, ) ea. ` C o NTY OF 2CINQ On this ') -.day of D*senbar, 1958, biters se, the undersigned, a Notary Public in sad for the State of Washington, duly o oneeis a ion.ed and sworn, personally appeared RALPH J. SLIDER, J.1., and DARLENE EA3tDr.R, • to me known to be the Tresident and Secretary, respsstively, of INTER- LAKE BROADCASTING OOHTORATIOJ, the corporation that executed the fore- going instrument, and aoknewledged the said instrument to be the free • and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and pur- poses tharein mentioned, and on oath stated that they wen• authorized to exeoute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the o or- a poate seal of said corporation. 4' t r WITNESS sty hand and official seal hereto affixed the day • esld. roar in this nertifioate above wr�ttan. • • CMS f -_ t • tr n and tar th. tat .44 . .. M -2- of Washington, residirk; it Seattle =9 �; sy-n ... 't i :7 _ . •it r,,a Ni�G,`,b 9' �{�i�.�^ r 'rich dX:Vr '44; `�' ' ''V,,. ,�y } i,�';' * ; ', i 7 , x f . /ice".€" ' ' . 'RSA f' $ , .. T►t...,1 -'i P/ 481 •.�'3t i..le _ .r III 2,Ciao. `1.4 �,1 'l,J, i4 *'' _ « iyj 'fi { r� a ° j iW:Iiitrc vii-f'4,4i*"...41.6"..‘:9.71:471.CaliCitrjr,..::**7: '....-.,-;.‘-'1.?d.:•4.5'4::::e1:4:''••-,' ..!:'I..F*; '14:7;:.•,.''',::: .., : ' '. • a1 tag,' ' r •tt�ie^ i a, Noel, the =dor- s�r. t 1, t i':h ` s duly *asks :; ..-- ►M IC , JR. glut ,,, ' :.. t14 treed wl► Searstasl '4 - • tu., s z -s't-r •. R �s . iid instrn- •thati - : k. ..,,,, Akr•2•r s ` ` 1 . t ion limo'. s� . # r( 4as `? c is ; ., elan 'i, co 'istL ataic•d th•y c ,i*0 e� • ;lestwur. rsad tit tee seal at- 1� $ :4�. ' •k. $a q hail, :iallllal,seal eilote .'tlxsd the day { c t sf, • -this tVtittstl* wit�n.,� t '�c 2 w l Fi� � ^fig , r / `�,.r :a,:pIIVILmr. iii, the hate of Washington, residing at Seattle. Still; d ditalleSTOO ) so. COUNTY OP ZIE ) Oa Usia dq of December, 1,58, before me, the under- signed, a hl•ias? and fee the state of Washington, duly oossaissioned• sworn, personally app•arod RALPH J. , ., to me knows t• b• tile LoNster ef the *MA!J Cr ZALTI J. SAIDRR,• DRORASJID the inittrigheal lite esassted the foregoing ins tr ment, and x ask nowledged the said instrrosasat to bl•Ybe fro* mad itellitntary aot and deed of said • ' Itimed, and on oath stated that he was authorisedas sash Rzesuttor to execute the said instrument. c :.,h WI BS5 Foy hand and offlelal sisal hereto affixed the day T� ''par in this •art if i•at• abc7 Witten. 4 • :� � of Yaahingten, residing at Seattle. 4 •w-! A?4 od OP WABHDIGT ) as. •• COUNTY OP NINO .} az« On this )(' day of December, 1958, before me, the under- • ,.`"jAe:, signed, a Notary Pao in and for the State of Washington, duly rix` F• c oRs i is s i fined, sworn, par s ersally appeared A LBERT S. BA 1 Ch and s ,-. ,7 • -/ , to ae known to be the ?resident and/..l,_ %.. / ; . SecrL ary, respeotIrely, of FIRS? IXTTICSTIh�T COMPANT, the oorpora- ,•, tion that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said t f ?, corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on ' oath stated that they were authiss to execute the said instru- , , �r want and that the seal affixed is the corporate teal of said cop- rk poration. '`a4 s%n• WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed this day '74' �'�: year in this certificate abm►s written. ', xF 4`��±,,;_' CiV t , •A l,t,.v.rfR t +;:k M ' ItorAAhi� LJO in and or £S.s State 'I • ;„ r-Ale, + of Washington, residing at Seattle. • 1' Rogues. ui :-,R -3.. ROBERT A MOI.P;',. Couniy Auc-• u!�s" • h.... Z'^t,V143.1i,W 'r"7i+,73Z:=,..,, a.... y.,:ar.l., e. 1:..W... •:. w...,.. l t,, EtiaLtiEtil THIS AGREEMENT made this day of •1lfL Y • 19 7. , by and between �l a i+� ' r `. S� ( N p0� 14GA 5 5A/N DOS/ and , his wife, hereinafter called "Grantors", and King County Water District ul No. 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, D hereinafter called "Grantee." 1; WITNESSETH: i i CDThat said Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, do(es) by ` t1') these presents grant, bargin, sell, convey and confirm unto the " r` said Grantee, its successors, or assigns, a right-of-way or ease- ment for Water andollooRs. Mains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the fol'.owing described property situated in King County, Washington, particularly described as follows: # A PERMANENT EASEMENT described. as 'ttie Southerly 30 feel of the El of the SW) of the NWT of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , less County Road. i ALSO A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMXNT described as the Southerly 40 feet of the Els of the SWk of the NWk of said Section 14, less County Road. Any tree larger than t Oinches in diameter shall be logged and saved for the Grantors use. The said tree may be staked at the Grantors property. FILED for Record at Request Ot -lame Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until such time as the said utilities have been accepted for operation and maintenance by King County Water District No. 90, but not later than December 31. 1976. Record Owners John Saindon Easement No. 14-23-5-2 10708 A Street Tacoma, Washingtcn 98444 td • `M • , That said Grantee shall have the right without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law. at times as may be necessary, to enter upon said property for the purpose 'of' constructing, repairing, altering, or reconstructing said Water et•Ourisimt Main, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or lia- bility therefor; provided that such constructing, repairing, altering or reconstructing of said Water or Sewer Main shall be accomplished . in such a manner that the private improvements existing in this right-of-way shall not be disturbed or destroyed, or in the event they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered tl) upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of said easement, so long as said use does not interfere with the installa- - tion and maintenance of the Water Main and so long as no k jpermanent buildings or structures are erected on said easement. r- This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs, and assigns of both parties hereto. 1 te,' Ce.-e--72%-)7.6-j STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I, the undersigned, a notary public in anq„for the State of Was on. hereby certify that on this o� day of � t _, 19 7 _, personally appeared before me iQ hff M, ccfl S Dtent4 and h!£S" I/J J , to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 7 Not y Pu lic in a � ' t State of Washingto 'din, :yat " lee; le ;� rr.s .. itecoriar's Note: Notarial seal on the reverse si lo. 1 I _ ...__. i i • FILED for Record at Request of .o Filed at request of: N -aS, a- G02HOLM$ & KELLOGG P TH, D :1. (..G BG[ 90) RENIO —4 w w/.srer.croN veoss 0 • / :'C:03 9NIM SoNO338 CD kE z rid L$ 11t bst 1S3no38 40'_.. 03011003V w io • } '.. .. • E. baLt1EtIT • THIS AGREEMENT made this 20th day of May • 19 75 _, by and between Rex Ball trasse and Roy Ral1estrassQ . WA-'fie' hereinafter called "Grantors", and King County Water District No. 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington. t hereinafter called "Grantee." l tr. WITNESSETH: i r` r` That said Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, do(es) by tQ these presents grant, bargin, sell, convey and confirm unto the said Grantee, itsRbuccessors, or assigns, a right-of-way or ease- , ment for Water an _-Cs%+et Mains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property situated in King County, Washington, particularly described as follows: s A PERMr.NENT EPSEMENT described as the Westerly 30 feet of the W1 l of the W1 of the NA of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. . less County Road. ALSO A PERMANENT EASEMENT described as the Southerly 30 feet of the # W1 of the W1 of the NWT of said Section 14. f ALSO A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT described as the Southerly 40 feet of the W1 of the W1 of the NWT of said Section 14. All tree above 8" in diameter to be saved, stacked in various places on the Grantors property for his use. FILED for Record at Request of • • c— ft4 0 C;�ry time �() Address Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until such time as the said utilities have . been accepted for operation and maintena a by King County Water District No. 90. but not later than Ja// /A• /976 Record Owner: Rex and Roy f3allestrasse Easement No. 14-23-5-1 201 S. W. 12th Street Renton, Washington 98055 ,.,-.0-00) �� That said Grantee shall have the right ,s4xhout prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at times as' may necessary, o enter upon said property for the purpose of constructing, repairing, altering, or reconstructing said Water or Sewer Main, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or lia- bility therefor: provided that suc nstructing, repairing, altering or reconstructing of said Water oa +et Main shall be accomplished t in such a manner that the private improvements existing in this right-of-way shall not be disturbed or destroyed, ll be oreind ithe n event ood a ytheyare disturbed or destroyed, t y `j condition as they were immediately before the property was entered J i upon by the Grantee. f ,D The Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of said ••• easement, so long as said use does not interfere with the installa- I • tion and maintenance of the Water and Sewer Main and so long as no permanent buildings or structures are erected on said easement. This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs, and assigns of both parties hereto. ed„..,,..„ : • 0.„,,,_ STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, hereby certify that on this 20th day of May , 19 75 _, personally appeared before me Rav Iiallrgtrasse and Rex Ballestrasse . • to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed • the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. . Ra(s.or i oVet.powisz-J—) s . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at . %.:57-4 ril/. Ii% • • .•,1s..�',•. C .. v • • n• s n•. a, ' . I • • • j-A. t . ' .a • FILED for Record at Requat 01 o • • Filed at request of : o N HOLM P. KrIIOCC P.S. MO S th.K:. •,t 12 ti 5CY 991 • ktr+u,N,.WASmr:(..lCU 9E S -^J . 1 VI :n71:-.313 7 S08003a I— • • ' 1)3%1;3 -.1 0 a• £2 Z Wd LI ifir St& • I iO 1S3f103b v 30 0308033u w 0 0 1 I E. 1 ! ' AZ Z + . t CERTIFICATE E WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: t, the l:;:icrsig iced,-y Clerk of the K Office of the city d.:Tk City of Renton, Washington,certify that this is a true Renton Aiunic;� l bLAding m 200 M' Avenue South and correct copy of % - o- • /0- _ Rentorq/A 980 D ,^ CI Subscribed and Seal-H•, ' T . of J'Ary 99�r1 CZtrs: • N V perk ' L+ :c CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON P. ORDINANCE NO. 4612 y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER R : SERVICE IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HIGHLANDS, HEATHER W DOWNS, AND MAPLEWOOD SUB-BASINS AND ESTABLISHING THE t AMOUNT OF THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES. w I~: c THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN 4 E I AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer 1 Service Special Assessment District for the area served by. the East {t 6 Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor in the northeast quadrant of the • 1 1 49 City of Renton and a portion of its urban growth area within ! f, ! Olt unincorporated King County, which area is more particularly f 4, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. A map of the service S i C G 1 area is attached as Exhibit "B." The recording of this document is I ito provide notification of potential connection and interest i 1 charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the ! i i City does not require payment until such time as the parcel is a j connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The , property may be sold or in any other way change hands without -• triggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges • I associated with this district. i # SECTION II. Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer ? facilities in this Special Assessment District and which properties • _.a - 1 ORDINANCE 4 612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling iunits or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit 'Yp" and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0.069 per square x 1.4 foot of property. Those properties included within this Special P. Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder 1 are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "A" 0 1 A and which boundary is shown on the map attached as Exhibit "B." 1 a 04 SECTION XII. In addition to. the aforestated charges, there CO 0 shall be a charge of 4 .11% per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. 1 i i The interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years 9 from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges 1 Iwill be simple interest and not compound interest . i i , SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. i i PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 10th day of June t 1996 . ' 1 ] . 1 : Marilyn J etersen, City Clerk 7 y 2 I 1 y ORDNANCE 4 612 APPROVED EY THE MAYOR this 10th day of June , 1996. Jes e Tanner, Mayor Approve as to form: rutArv•-ay.e.P91.4-4-0r."..Q.40.- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney =� Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. o v Li • y I CFI � 1 A • 3 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON- EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 and 22 all in Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. in King County, Washington Section 8, Township 23N,Range 5E W.M. ; All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. lying East of the F East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the centerline of NE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its { intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast A of i said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of z SR 405 and the terminus of said line. *p 0 Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. 1 All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying South and e p East of the following described line: • -, (D i Beginning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its intersection with the centerline ( of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 9; thence East i along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of . NE 10th Street; thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. t s i Section 10,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. L } All of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly t - and Westerly of the following described line: Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its intersection with the North line of ; the South 1/ of the North 1/2 of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly • along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of the Southeasts 1 of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with East . line of said Section 10 and the terminus of said line. • • I F3DATA1390.2.075=REKsEDsADIEDALd. Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton-East Renton Interceptor Page 2 of 3 Section 11,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. • All of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11,Township 23N, Range 5E W.M.. Section 14,Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 1 of said section, together with the Southwest 1 of said section, except the South 1 of the Southeast 1A of said Southwest 1/4 and except the plat of McIntire Homesites and 1 of streets adjacent as recorded in the Book of Plats, Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County, Washington, and except $ the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of Cedar Rivero Five Acre Tracts as recorded in the Book of Plats,Volume 16, Page 52, Records of F King County, Washington, less 1/2 of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, GA Block 1, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts, less lit of e, ez the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82.785 feet of Q) the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts and less 0 ih the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. CO ' CD Section 15,Township 23N, Range SE W.M. CM . • All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M., except the Southwest 1 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest V4 of said section. s Z Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. i li c • All of that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., except that t portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast V4 of the said Section 16 lying East of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King County Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast 1 of the Southeast V4 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly of the Northerly right-of-way line of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway). , i • G • Section 17,Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying i Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying , generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying i j i F1DATAWENtIe2-079502JjEYLSEDS DLEGALdoc 1. Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton—Fast Renton Interceptor Page 3 of 3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR 405. Section 21, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All that portion of Section 21, Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. described as a follows: All of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast IA of said Section 22 lying Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County, Washington. 0? r temi • Together with the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast'/a of said Section 22. (ADF. F. • • • • {t i 1 F.WATAiREMt024)9k7rREVlSEOuADLE6AL.dOc JjJj - i • 1 Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR 4 Special Assessment District Boundary i Sc�� 1tYiA ;inn yr r .. RULJII •[nC tlp� K !lU j I S 11 �.. .3 �� tridArg-Ii . E w tan j n,e s r 11. A Latrm----.; K'ea 1 5t �'.1 1/�. i sF• irs:n Si - { K i s i ,� Ig rrnn st 1,111 IJOSU 9 ! A s i ti.i..4.I, jaw 1 rir tom,721-e -i Vardw - 1 v Ir. I 1 , 13� ,�1; AL,41.c: - �, 3 t :�r►,p. 21r..�,. „wid, --:I II it : 0',:7*• -'ti.141.4.4.446,I*y 4 rer. - '‘, .1 .AlrerAll'Aik I I: - tr'--4rfo' A 1.1 .P i i; le iti f. / ;•'-'7:- ,9". 446.405,1t4.3,09k-) I 4 -1;-..., 4r-4226-0.41 .,..,4! Al 4- Alt -.41 °V.,ArAdi ArA1 44,1 1 F ' )t r Air.. . - -I rir •... .. Pr #,------..4;w-- --., -• ..---, w . .1 - --. ... 4, - • . - A...k... A MI i' �� .r1 ; rodo-...1*--- it / / I I � �I�i �fige....410,41 r Al .- 01 I 1 9 4yr - - . • "- • 1 or iAp AEI 4 ...._14,11,1 ,/ thifff ..1511LAIV 41 AA 4, ./ ,:g ,,,--___,,,,\:. . . V-2;-_?, -3Pr 17 Arti;11 I 1 \- ....._,.\\\.,.._.__ --...-... -- r!fpfit%'° J--- 4.60-rAir.irt-.4,1 PO Ar- Air, rAirAilxv IF .4irti 4Nz."44-4:(•• r *---ATAiarldneti'C-110:.441 1 -10.:**4.,.. ,,,.:..ep...4, ,op____Amiforirro:02 . -.01 -Aftlitl F:14r AP ;ems, .....= Off . 44'It4 . ----''-' t*, •1;7-j e Crl 1 1"1'-- X IF:0 sr rc.,,,_411s. .!emP____7,Nz, .•\-S1401.0k i i �g 0 2000 ' *11'1 a A.---• 10.11 E[3;,. = 1 [I-LJV/ Z7N SI �•})��7C,_se , N. Y g, SANITARY SEWERS City l'cmits ; + Planing/ , Warlcs E1. specid Assessment District ; Ckiztensen,MacacOnieVisneski . -1)' 20 may 1996 1 i - z • • • . In KIN Ca:r,T,Ruc.•s'.x-C;.,r C ei s • l0 AUG 31 1994 Cashier Section 2 Superior Court Clerk • 3 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 KING COUNTY, ) 6 Petitioner, ) NO. 9 4 - 2 22093 4 7 ) • vs. ) NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS 8 ) MARTHA I. CARLSON and JOHN DOE ) 9 CARLSON, wife and husband, ) r4 WAYNE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) ;1 10 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) Tr EUGENE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) C 11 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) GO CLAYTON JOHN CARLSON and JANE ) 0 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • CDCD each as their separate estate, ) rr 13 as to an undivided one-half ) interest and MIRAIM E. MICHAEL ) 14 and JOHN DOE MICHAEL, wife and ) husband, LEROY MICHAEL and ) 15 JANE DOE MICHAEL, husband and ) wife, LESTER MICHAEL and JANE .) 1G DOE MICHAEL, husband and wife, ) ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW and ) 17 JOHN DOE KUSSOW, wife and ) husband, WILLIAM H. WILSON and ) 18 JANE DOE WILSON, husband and ) wife, JACQULIN MILLER and JOHN ) 19 DOE MILLER, wife and husband, ) ESTELLE RAGSDALE and JOHN DOE ) 20 RAGSDALE, wife and husband, ) MERLYN PAGEL and JANE DOE ) 21 PAGEL, husband and wife, OLIVE ) KARVIA and JOHN DOE KARVIA, ) 22 wife and husband, DALE KAPPELL ) and JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband ) 23 and wife, FRANK KAPPELL and ) JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband and ) 24 wife, JANET V. COSLOR and JOHN ) • DOE COSLOR, wife and husband, ) 25 BETTY CARPENTER and JOHN DOE • ) Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION 050 King County Courthouse NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS — 1 Seattle,Washington 98104-2312 • STREYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN (206)296-9015 FAX(206)296-0191 • , • •.o:i •ie ,. :, ., -r4sd.:s+.:,.xl,a.01 r t�a,e= s,.� +.+'u7'^iFi' - .-3 .:•;-.y:rs_:x.� ,...' .Vo: .`'3.f�. +'M. -.,� 1 , • 1 CARPENTER, wife and husband, ) GILBERT BREHM and JANE DOE ) 2 BREHM, husband and wife, DUANE ) BREHM and JANE DOE BREHM, ) 3 husband and wife, BARBARA ) BRYLES and JOHN DOE BRYLES, ) 4 wife and husband, ADRIS BUTLER ) and JANE DOE BUTLER, husband ) 5 and wife, GARY F. BASS and ) JANE DOE BASS, husband and ) 6 wife, each as their separate ) estate, as to the remainder, ) 7 HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. ) BERRY, husband and wife, or ) 8 their respective heirs and ) devisees, W. V. BRADLEY and ) 9 VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and ) wife and OIVA J. CARLSON and ) 10 MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and ) wife, or their heirs and ) r4 11 devisees, PATSY A. CARLSON aka ) PATRICIA A. CARLSON and JOHN ) d' 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) Q STATE OF WASHINGTON, JERRY ) UP 13 BENNETT and JANE DOE BENNETT, ) O husband and wife, d/b/a/ KINGS ) ' 0/ 14 COURT, RAM REMANUFACTURING & ) O DISTRIBUTING, INC. NORTHWEST ) 15 AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. , UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL ) 16 REVENUE SERVICE, CONSOLIDATED ) COAL COMPANY, a corporation, ) 17 GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA ) A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife, ) 18 or their respective heirs, ) JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. ) 19 GOODE, husband and wife, or ) their respective heirs, ) 20 HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. , ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 21 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND ) HEALTH SERVICES, JAMES L. ) 22 MARENAKOS, as his separate ) estate, ISAAC COOPER and JANE ) 23 DOE COOPER, husband and wife, ) ALICE MARY McEACHERN and JOHN ) 24 DOE McEACHERN, wife and ) husband, ALFRED HACKETT and ) 25 JANE DOE HACKETT, husband and ) Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS — 2 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN ( )296-901S FAX(206)296-0191 9j I^ �;:✓!tY Lr,.��,�...x.- ..r�a...:.:.�w .S . 1......:.,.cy .r'..:�'..✓r i...6. EiSA�,sK-'?i "CR..��,.. . ,t�.� li. � � .....`�.�1, �x �:�w�{ �'� �+�Ir, 'c,...fu'4.�,'=a q,::,7 ' ;,+ ti } Yr a Ys ` b sfa fi` r. .Y.,r',r a' bzas �R rfi° H �re� K C , � `. � t F t.. �, e�l',.s � 7�Yr'. '�.• �Y S a �� lei 'nY r' �'h�cl'4. a4 f i'y{y �.� + r r�:.-. '*«[�jC,r .,. . � ,t �.Jii y/, •„4 �id,�,""'x�"' . �i , ,3.tC,, ,yi t w. `ey'„ GY :t ..,wr 1 7'.y�,r.,.f ., , Y'3r 1v+ePt i.„ .Ti.{5,,yri_,`�^3�,vii ' ylrs Y''}`•`�Y S, Iw F u Y 'k 4X4 ,� �,J °! C j'"• ''"��"ITT, �`" 5F'�bt+}^i-tt � � „� ^,x":1 '�ti' ,x ,'wfGYJ�•''n t,,.n �'a�,5 i6 .! ;'. r ;'"r` n?' ttgt,.;k'". �.°ti 'e `• 1.. .tt,r.'� „cr 'i 't ± .0„t ��„m Fz, r,i x'S x K," Y„s • -.,, �.r t ,,,,,O �i �.e,r ' :+ `s c ooki e , 4A-. 'S.x< i 'E ;0 a' r�0? i 2l}y T47: "ff° ?L t . "e. ,. { .,,.-'hn"y"K, . +:iv ,,.. ,- :k?`ttY t -Ce tiz- i. .:;�.sSt�'- ,A YTt,t.t S" '" a' 0 1.L'io e : '° x.'..r a e+' x� r1Y'$ r+� 3''.2 ay' 't+r (��-.'...,,k r*A x 3a..M',i J 10,,i?t Ss.. !"M` . t S.+7dx'a t,i rr-J,,9.f.,,,4,,,,,4{°i a`. .: ,.: :.•�YtJ'? i. ;§.,. y;: .,, ,`1.�i�Karr�' v-�, ✓ �x �u ,�.f. .�vi. •..'{ r� .r"` *r 1v�i�' ii,,.`.t ., t. L vas ,.;1 1 wDOeOMRALHI,Lwf RnKLdEhunsbaJnOHN ) 2 O. J. CARLSON and KELLY ', - ) • l>r CARLSON, husband and wife and ) • 3 ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS OR ) r PARTIES, INCLUDING UNKNOWN ) 4 HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF ANY ) PERSON DECEASED, CLAIMING ANY ) 5 RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR ) - ---... ' . INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE ) 6 DESCRIBED HEREIN, ) 7 Respondents. ) R 8 ) )9 i 10 NOTICE is hereby given that action has been commenced in the t 1 vA 11 above-entitled court on the petition of the Petitioner above named i :1 rr 12 against the above-named Respondents, that the object of said action .: t0 13 is to acquire title to the premises hereinafter described, to bar i-."`..,.: O 0/ 1a the Respondents and each of them having or asserting any right, O rr 15 title, estate, lien or interest in or to said premises adverse to 16 Petitioner's fee simple title thereto, that the action affects title 17 18 19 • 20 21 22 - 23 24 •�'_,N: . (as.•' 25 i y^, „1 Norm Maleng F . Prosecuting Attorney ;;�-i0 CIVIL DIVISION IA*ft • PS50 King County Courthouse alI NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS - 3 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 7,:.-IV STAEYLE\CARLSON\LISPEN.DEN (206)296-9015 ' h `-. FAX(206)296-0191 �2 fx1 ' erb 'tdr. .•'A;;;,:, f., 't4�1 * "'' ig'quvtriFe•-",V..', , lic7470'‘ ''''',i, .....-t7-'•,-. .ki-;•,,,,i-o,-...... -,:-,-.-q•••,;•-•.-7 -4.,.•- ' i ' -- ' " '''•••• ef,*,..4 4, •';•.'”'le'•"(r•-';',!.;1'':.1'-'• t-•'.1',.4'':4'...•'--•''•••'a•z•C',"i't.:•:. ..•1•2,ii.:•••"Y-:,• ,•t•ii1:, •,11•. :.,:r..,-.Z•li.e•:.••-"‘.i:',1 ,r,-..?-,.....',..“1,4;;:';?,.....,,.....,„. ;•4 v,... . ,',.' , • . ' ' ,• . " ,v1,4'...,t,i."'" ,:r.qC, ,,,t,'.4:41;,,qi:fii.,;::' ::','-'47,,Ps'All:e,e'.17,_,ZZ:414''.AA-,?,;‘,A,,t, W''.!...tn,On 7,.''C''''''r"A?:'.'.:-. ,'...'.•+•:-•: .'.Z:' ,':.:A..'i,'"t%''I'',','.;:'''..*';',.i. Lt,4.......• -.,..1.*:37id'iPt-04:-;::.:,.,•tei...srIS,q:i.2%:;:::it..•4'.:,V,''''.,:''':'.':'' i'.;:l.N4,72.F.,:*'.e.'''''.• •t`,1131,444,Ii.4..:6..V.iiii, ..4?q..4..,,,V,,,,,,i,),,y;tjf,,;.,,.;,,.fs.,,N;V ,;,:',v.:..t.::,,,,,';.;.? ...'.,,:::. 1 . , , , , , .,::;,,i,i0VI,,,.:,...,7;..4.0,, .,..1::44z,z.,,,,z..it, ,,E.,'Tk.,.f At 4,. ..?., i-7)re ;- ,1111,-;4•,^:.'"t7;: t1'414,..?4';:*""t'.'-',.;'7::f31.-PI:n‘r;.',40'':.:71:',1,':' .!!:•":..:" '''.•7::.'...• .... ':.'...-:''• ' ' •'''.1.;'4:11,''it.4,0*,..'''. ktrariZIP:'''''.?.'iN75)9c7;r4t61 a,:$,';•:*.t.l'*'.4,--.....,n•::Plti74.• pos...:.,!-7.n,,,;.,,i:i.,..:,•:!g.,.,..-,-,.,•.,..::,:: ,:,.?,,i,•:?.,:,?:.„.,•,,•••,:,• :;;;.„::,;., ,.. ....i,. ,-'.i3-4.!'''.1*.Vs.Illifftr.`‘16:1';77‘ ' ' '''',V--..i.-iiV,V.Rc,'....-xg.'Ti•:'•:•.1:477:;' ,'•''',"•‘•,:.'''F••••'•....'f 7•••....",s,,.7,k,,..': -....1,!?;.:.;,..,1... ...t P:: :.1 A.‘"•41e, . ..,p 4. , 4:.•.•• '., .., . .., r.'‘•...•••;,,,•,. ., :...,..4.-.--.t-,;1.:1-I' .;'-'1',.--'•...'-!.1••''''4 9! `•1'... :.•••''...‘i*..-,•',,,.t,",....i,... •4' :•'•.-. • •'''''''''`•"••••.'1"?'1?-.••4•,'"-' =41.•••F':• -•"'''•'''-•+ ••••••,*-- ''• ...••••-: :•:,.,-••,f•4'4,,n;..06;t: Rir".'.:`,. , '...r,/ /.',,1•"4'...t••.4 04 ZV.'...5.•••, .'"f ,•• ''..4.‘ 4-6"."...•,'••••••• '• ' '...":•''''4";•'•?•'-,•'''''.... 44r•i'•`•'.'•ri..-'''2•1t.,':r..;14'•4•••••44A4V.Ift.C;404-tii•k-kr1,A.0:04'.4-7;•:' .,),...•*.ITF';',, .;.!'"'..-...,...,.,;. , • ..a......s....-*—..-..•• .. . . .. • • , .-. ..•• . • . , . r,...; .• ilif . s' • ' ' 4• ''. . - ..,••., — . . *•.,.. ,, . ., . ...,• "...!•:.:.' c' • . • .••1;t . •• : . i"•••. 1 to the real estate more particularly described in Exhibit "A", a 2 copy of which is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference (v.4 3 herein. ...../ /) /_,..,, ,,-/ , , . ----)....1......- 1994. ., of f••1?c-I./i 4.-1,./i ,4 Dated this , day ' s 5 • NORM MALENG(- King County Prosecuting Attorney 6 . , . --7 . , • ; - I,. 7/1c-•••(//' • 7,,' BY:i •C ."' I 201 18 i THOMAS W. KliFFEL," WSBA 8 • tyProfosercKutininggcAoutntotyrney 9 Depu Attorney 10 w4 cl 1 1 ., it 1 0 12 .*, I CI, CD 13 a) C) 14 • str Cr) 15 16 • 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 •Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney .-..-... CIVIL DIVISION ;. ESSO King County Courthouse --,--, • ; ---,-., ',. NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS - 4 STREYLE\CARLSOHNLISPEN.DEN Seatle(2061)296_,W9oashoington 98104-2312 FAX(206)296-0191 .?; 401. 1 ,1 —'•Wr-.1-bt,VW-4114,":444!,::.tV''71.9 : ".. - -'*'11...4 1-4,"...1 .7 c trkS ma`s t uk� d • r .i L „cs t h'. 4t'33 S St" ...:.._..i.,..>.`r+-♦ ...-. ... :....,.aA..4.w.r...•.w vwxw.S^vi'+w..Cyw+w...x•r..w+.�.w+w:._..�. ..._ ___._.... _ .._.:�. �- • • [PL4 2 3 i 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 i KING COUNTY, ) 6 ) Petitioner, ) NO. 7 ) vs. ) PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION 8 ) MARTHA I. CARLSON and JOHN DOE ) • 9 CARLSON, wife and husband, ) WAYNE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) 10 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) EUGENE CARLSON and JANE DOE ) t4 11 CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • C\2 CLAYTON JOHN CARLSON and JANE ) 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) CD each as their separate estate, ) C 13 as to an undivided one-half ) G) interest and MIRAIM E. MICHAEL ) O 14 and JOHN DOE MICHAEL, wife and ) husband, LEROY MICHAEL and ) Cr) 15 JANE DOE MICHAEL, husband and ) wife, LESTER MICHAEL and JANE ) 16 DOE MICHAEL, husband and wife, ) ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW and ) 17 JOHN DOE KUSSOW, wife and ) husband, WILLIAM H. WILSON and ) 18 JANE DOE WILSON, husband and ) wife, JACQULIN MILLER and JOHN ) 19 DOE MILLER, wife and husband, ) ESTELLE RAGSDALE and JOHN DOE ) 20 RAGSDALE, wife and husband, ) MERLYN PAGEL and JANE DOE ) 21 PAGEL, husband and wife, OLIVE ) KARVIA and JOHN DOE KARVIA, ) 22 wife and husband, DALE KAPPELL ) and JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband ) • 23 and wife, FRANK KAPPELL and ) JANE DOE KAPPELL, husband and ) 24 wife, JANET V. COSLOR and JOHN ) DOE COSLOR, wife and husband, ) • 25 BETTY CARPENTER and JOHN DOE ) Norm Malcng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 1 Seattle,Washington 98104-2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)2964015 FAX(206)296-0191 1 . ..�'S:..a'�-+,.r+.:w'.1 ^,. - �Fo.z s'- ..,;�• , K%�.: c. . :t>*-r., t ,.fu�`4.�: ,."✓.f'&{ i iCiSYSZL'eu .�1�.. rr , , 1 CARPENTER, wife and husband, ) GILBERT BREHM and JANE DOE ) 2 BREHM, husband and wife, DUANE ) BREHM and JANE DOE BREHM, ) 1 , 3 husband and wife, BARBARA ) ft BRYLES and JOHN DOE BRYLES, ) 4 wife and husband, ADRIS BUTLER ) = and JANE DOE BUTLER, husband ) 5 and wife, GARY F. BASS and ) JANE DOE BASS, husband and ) • 6 wife, each as their separate ) ` estate, as to the remainder, ) ik 7 HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. )( t, s ti 8 BERRY, husband and wife, or ) ( i their respective heirs and ) devisees, W. V. BRADLEY and ) 9 VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and ) t. wife and OIVA J. CARLSON and ) 10 MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and ) wife, or their heirs and ) 11 devisees, PATSY A. CARLSON aka ) 4 PATRICIA A. CARLSON and JOHN ) d' 12 DOE CARLSON, husband and wife, ) • Q STATE OF WASHINGTON, JERRY ) (0 13 BENNETT and JANE DOE BENNETT, ) O husband and wife, d/b/a/ KINGS ) 14 COURT, RAM REMANUFACTURING & ) CD DISTRIBUTING, INC. NORTHWEST ) 4,40 15 AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. , UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL ) 16 REVENUE SERVICE, CONSOLIDATED ) COAL COMPANY, a corporation, ) 17 GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA ) A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife, ) 18 or their respective heirs, ) JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. ) 19 GOODE, husband and wife, or ) their respective heirs, ) 20 HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. , ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 21 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND ) HEALTH SERVICES, JAMES L. ) 22 MARENAKOS, as his separate ) estate, ISAAC COOPER and JANE ) 23 DOE COOPER, husband and wife, ) ALICE MARY McEACHERN and JOHN ) 24 DOE McEACHERN, wife and ) , husband, ALFRED HACKETT and ) 25 JANE DOE HACKETT, husband and ) Norm Makng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION ESSO King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 2 Seattle,Washington 98104-2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296-9015 FAX(206)296-0191 4 i ..gas_.— .._......,,, sa... .. . . .. ..,,. 1f7..•%a.-,..—ti.,. ..7 , .''.., 4t.' % :;? .`S r-iu 4+a.O.,.t1S`..J.t7>--xLN(4:`t,- * 1-11-tt ,�a � , Er p" 7F r k ,� fir. . • • .� 9^y P �E.° l;' 1^ .w utt rtfi1; ,41,ai1q'l,i-'!':y�{r +4:4114 tr:14: r�*.7.t�„y�✓� �`'� h�,rp6'tS. •D' v`. is,t'7tC.t a z y yv F� cV - � t. rt: iv' > • 1 wife, MATHILDA CORKLE and JOHN ) DOE CORKLE, wife and husband, ) 2 O. J. CARLSON and KELLY ) CARLSON, husband and wife and ) ' 3 ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS OR ) PARTIES, INCLUDING UNKNOWN ) 4 HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF ANY ) PERSON DECEASED, CLAIMING ANY ) 5 RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR ) INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE ) 6 DESCRIBED HEREIN, ) 7 Respondents. ) 8 ) 9 ) • 10 11 King County petitions and represents to the court as follows: C1 12 1. King County is a duly organized and existing class AA rr CD 13 county of the State of Washington empowered with the right of 0 0)) 14 eminent domain. O d' 15 2. King County seeks to take or appropriate certain real 16 property described herein located within the County ( "the proper- 17 ty" ) . 18 3. The property King County seeks to take or appropriate is 19 necessary for a public use, that is, for the acquisition and 20 development of the 1989 Open Space Bond Cedar River to Lake 21 Sammamish Trail Project. 22 4. King County has attempted to acquire the property by 23 negotiation, but has been unable to agree with the owners. 24 5. The King County Council, by Ordinance No. 11175, passed on - • 25 December 13, 1993, has directed the Prosecuting Attorney to petition Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION E550 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 3 Seattle,Washington 98104.2312 _ STRETLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296.9015 FAX(206)296-0191 Vtrt r n 9r, r hwY y k4!. • � d '?3 .)E r1� � i' .F,r�.r t?Ff�� tiiY1 � +CJ'...�y i "�. ♦�fK.l�M� ,+S C' �r. _' a fy�i� V a/ � �+ .. r, 1 t s..� 4 f r. rw y� s.,+,�;r > t r ( r 'ir�a` „ ,.�, +ta ?�.4 ,�;*i. r q try ttn ''y $ i J a `' W♦ u L 'a '�.' '' �{ }S re J k, j 51 •d 'fi_,�s 4 f 'Y 4� w `V 1 �', 1... fit it yam. ,r � "A k• 3 �u i , .r rt ..y'�r�4 .4.,v " `t "` / fil erlei ai !' ` 1T f :>' . '' .. 1 r. w tr s'�.. Y'"'yi ' J q' F dl 4 f k. - i t•a T x d.0y a h r4 .�y-v .14Y e„at ?{;S re , 4 yc! jT ''k,, .• m c d 10? .6 4 0“ .T s t ''- ''.bati{4;I ' 4 4 -� II((WWW��""��. h +a ["c . < Tw� fs .. 4 tT iF f • • t • 3y`'. "" - ' a .. . • 1+ 1 for condemnation of the property. A copy of the ordinance is 2 attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 6. The property sought to be taken or appropriated is 4 described in Exhibit A. 5 7. The name of every owner or other person interested in the 6 property, so far as can be ascertained from the public records, is 7 set out in Exhibit B. 8 WHEREFORE, King County prays that an order be entered: 9 1. Adjudicating that the contemplated use for which the 10 property is sought to be taken or appropriated is really a public :4 11 use of the County, and that the taking or appropriation of the C 12 property is necessary for that public use. CD Cr) 13 2. Directing that a determination be made of the compensation • 14 and damages to be paid to the owners of the property, and to all G'1 15 other persons interested therein, for the taking or appropriation of 16 the property, such determination to be made by a jury, unless 17 waived, in which event the compensation or • damages shall be 18 determined by the Court without a jury. 19 DATED this 7 day of :/(r i'%'c'^- - , 1994. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 NORM MALENG • King County Prosecuting Attorney 22 23 By: /.• 24 THOMAS W. KUFFEL, WSBA# 20118 Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 25 Attorneys for King County Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney CIVIL DIVISION FS50 King County Courthouse PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION - 4 Seattle,Washington 98104-2312 STREYLE\CARLSON\PETITION (206)296-9015 f FAX(206)296-0191 .. .. .. eA .F, • ... ... kr K... d t >�7t w 3i n. �,:J�'�eM`>"�a• �}.. iS'+d�4�•'' _r�' . .zt..:ts • . : sa r,} lit > i'atf l,c .v --.4ww, t F, .-.. t G r f,t [-.44- icy 4.Y a /1 t ti • Sf } `•c 1 y f .a t*n).y ,✓t Y w. � ✓ .rh +f;(' � C r ss'y,FJ �,#� � �4� �.+ T '''r � 11-•�'31 r l- ; ,.. a • .; e ,`"3ti ' iF'7m 44: ` .` x •; ,� its ";��t, a - s .� ,v ��yy�5 ^rF'i�." '1�r'v `+0. 'rtY.r•/ t! `f. 1[ ^r!' ,5... a r'1 •'yai. dyQ. y 1 k. Re �h 4.A.Z f 1t • , 4 t t'• 0.4,04:`1 ,� 1:•� ``•`� k,,,,.45 C 4 •r r .1 l-aw j xT, 24.1 o s R a .19 PA rA r♦..4z,, `' }�' i s ,ri++}se,d . �,0„ ` 'iw'"f < u �i"'` vl C`,47.4t..t,iii{tee; f S,y,�^az '•-e `43$ y 7k+ :rq0",,,-•,. t"�c, 'iej' .. r 4 r 1 i 4 r+'y 4 i�' ty t .t :',J.: N`'f9 1+'N Y .:V1---r Q �4 Wa F.T•• M.Y ,,1'Y-.::,"�, . . . . . ._. .Z:4_ 4.: ...+.`._� ;.-{ r,42 ,. 'T!),.r t ,`:,.'t_ .. _ .. :.- ..�«...:..:gip ( December 9, 1993 . Introduced by: phillims 93-8745.N34 (dd) Proposed No.: 93-874 1 ORDINANCE NO. 11175 5 C 2 AN ORDINANCE authorizing condeanation 3 of the Finer Homes, Narenakos, and Carlson 4 properties for the acquisition and development S of tt.•., 1989 Open Space Bond Cedar River to Lake 6 Sammamish Trail Project. - 7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF XING COUNTY: B SECTION 1. The council finds and declares as follows: t 9 A. Xing County is authorized by state law R.C.W. 10 36.34.340, R.C.W. 36.68.010, R.C.W. 36.89.030 and R.C.W. 11 64.04.130, to acquire, develop, renovate and improve public 12 green spaces, greenbelts, open space, parks and trails in Xing 13 County. 14 B. Xing County is authorized to acquire and condemn real , 15 property for public use, such as green spaces, green belts, v-I 16 open space, parks and trails, by Chapter 8.08, R.C.W. rr 17 C. The Xing County Capital Improvement Program provides 18 for the acquisition of lands for the Cedar River to Lake d 19 Sammamish Trail and includes the Finer Homes, Karenakos, and Q 20 Carlson parcels (hereinafter called the "Properties") as morevil 21 particularly described below. 22 D. Pursuant to applicable federal and state procedures 23 and the real property acquisition procedures of King County, 24 King County has taken the necessary steps to acquire the 25 Properties through negotiations. 26 E. Pursuant to such applicable procedures, Xing County 27 has made written offer to purchase the Properties on the 28 following dates: 29 Finer Homes: May 5, 1993 30 August 8, 1993 31 October 6, 1993 32 Narenakos: June 6, 1992 33 December 12, 1992 • 34 July 7, 1993 35 Carlson: Hay 5, 1993 36 June 17, 1993 37 August 12, 1993 38 October 10, 1993 1 L -...... -�";,,+er: .'4%0;r_'•:r1, Rw:r: •,'-mt.W4 ra::.. •'h tftW`10�, .41,347?:.r,"}.:4s "1r1 7,1,;.'. +i+ • '�1„_'4-'1k "i 'w', ' ,.li yf3x:. ...viz,'1 , t .... .. .. � a.-...... ... «...... ..... H .a uNr. .a.a h..x in.N.......... s-.N++hW-.s. ...rr\.a.�:...• ...y- . 11175 1 F. In order to acquire the property and property rights 2 required to construct the Cedar River to Lake Sammasish Trail, ,0 3 it is necessary for King County to condemn the Properties for 4 public purposes as hereinafter more particularly set forth. t 5 G. The public health, safety, necessity, convenience, and t 6 welfare demand that the Cedar River to Lake Sammamish Trail be 7 constructed in accordance with the King County Capital 4 8 Improvement Program, and that the Properties be condemned, " 9 appropriated, taken and damaged for the construction of said 10 trail as provided in this ordinance. 11 SECTION 2. The King County council has deemed it 1 12 necessary and in the best interest of the citizens of King 13 County that the Properties be condemned, appropriated, taken 1 14 and damaged for the purpose of constructing the Cedar River to 0 15 Lake Sammamish Trail, subject to the making, or paying, of just :D 16 compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by CO17 law. The Properties are described as follows: • CD 18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOR TINER HOMES PROPERTY 19 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian trail 20 purposes over, across, upon and through the following described 21 property: 22 The South 100 feet AND the East 100 feet of the Southwest 23 quarter of the Northwest quarter; 24 ALSO the East 100 feet of the Southeast quarter of the 25 Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter; 26 All in Section 14, Township 23 North, Pang* 5 East, H.H., in 27 King County, Washington. 28 (Contains an area of 7.35 acres, more or less.) 29 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Y.ARENAxOS PROPERTY 30 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 31 over, across, upon and through the following described 32 property: 33 The South 50 feet, except the West 25 feet thereof, and the 34 West 25 feet of that portion of the North half of the North 35 half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of 36 Section 12, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.H., in King 37 County, Washington, described as follows: 38 Beginning at the Northwest corner of said subdivision; . 39 thence South 01'11'57" West, along the West line thereof, 40 325.64 feet to the Southwest corner of said subdivision; 41 thence South 86'42'14" East 30.02 feet to the Easterly margin 42 of 164th Avenue Southeast and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 43 thence continuing South 86'42'14" East, along the South line of 44 said subdivision, 1239.33 feet to the Northwesterly margin of . 2 . 11175 . 1 the Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right 2 of way; - 3 thence North 49.12'42" East, along said Northwesterly margin, 4 56.05 feet to the East line of said subdivision; 5 thence North 01.21'09", along said East line, 179.07 feet; 6 thence North 86.43'48° West 1281.47 feet to the Easterly margin 7 of 164th Avenue Southeast; 8 thence South 01.11'57" West along said East margin 217.53 feet 9 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 10 (Contains an area of 1.55 acres, more or less.) 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CARLSON PROPERTY — PARCEL 3fi 12 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 13 over, across, upon and through the following described 14 property: 15 Beginning at r, point on the South boundary line of the 16 Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 29, 17 Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.N., in Xinq County, 18 Washington, said point being 202 feet West of the Southeast 19 corner of said Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of 20 said Section 29; 21 thence in a straight line South 10.12' East 32 feet; 22 thence curving to the left, with a 10.51.5' curve through 23 10.50' of curvature, a distance of 99.08 feet; f:4 24 thence in a straight line South 21.01' East 285 feet; d 25 thence curving to the right, with a 13.24' curve through 17.48' 26 of curvature, a distance of 132.08 feet; CD 27 thence South 3.14' East 810 feat to a point 50 feet West of the CD 2B Southeast corner of said Section 29; • 0 29 thence East 50 feet to said Section corner; 30 thence North, along the East line of said Section 29, a O 31 distance of 1315 feet to the Northeast corner of the Southeast 32 quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 29; rT 33 thence West 202 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CI 34 (Contains an area of 2.42 acres, more or less.) 35 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR hiARENAKOS PROPERTY — PARCEL 37 36 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 37 over, across, upon and through the following described 38 property: 39 The East 50 feet of that portion of the Northeast quarter of 40 the Southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 6 41 East, W.H., in King County, Washington, described as follows: 42 Beginning at the Southeast corner of said subdivision; 43 thence North, along the East line of said section, 381 feet; 44 thence West 1168 feet, more or less, to the East boundary of 45 Sunset Highway; 46 thence Southeasterly, along the East margin of Sunset Highway, 47 384 feet to the South line of said subdivision; 48 thence East, along said South line, 1121 feet, more or less, to 49 the POINT OF BEGINNING. 50 (Contains an area of 0.44 acres, more or less.) 51 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CARLSON PROPERTY — PARCEL 64 52 An easement for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian purposes 53 over, across, upon and through the following described 54 property: 55 Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 28, Township 24 56 North, Range 6 East, H.H., in King County, Washington; 57 thence East 50 feet; • 3 . t'y :^rriJea—...,,4.•4=4,4,,, itilu • I,,_...**1'4"Nt"0`•"irdt.:L a;!.. ± e..oftA - -rz , xJ+ ,ivi *-- r±i" s''+',Rf'.i+.;`vs .: w v i • AMM rr.. 11175 1 thence North 3• vest S12 feat; 2 thence on a 12• curve to the left a distance of 148.03 feet; 3 thence Northwesterly to a point on the West line of said ' 4 Section which is 990 feet North of the Southwest corner of said 5 Section; 6 thence South to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 7 (Contains an area of 1.0S acres, more or less.) 8 SECTION 3. The King County council determines that 9 condemnation proceedings are hereby authorized to acquire the 10 Properties for the purposes of subject Parks trail. 11 SECTION A. The attorneys for King County are hereby 12 authorized and directed to begin and prosecute the proceedings 13 provided by law to condemn, take and appropriate the Properties 14 necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance. This 15 action shall not be initiated regarding the Carlson property 16 until 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance. This 17 action shall not be intitiated regarding the Finer Homes 18 property until the county has complied with all provisions of f4 19 RCW 8.26 and other relevant laws. 1111 20 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this cr--, day 21 of 0-e".trYl , 19 r CD 22 PASSED this / A day of 1 192.5 O 23 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 24 KING COUNTY, W SHINGTON 25 26 Chair 27 ATTEST: 28 jae'"„"'G 0 29 Clerk of the Council 30 APPROVED this 02.7.-Zr day of vEc-iyDr;< , 19_,V � I 31 32 g County Executive 33 Attachments: Maps 4 ; 04+'•1"- :a,NAfA'',, r l� i'll = '�•• < '4'r Z.:X vas. y&_. Y.,�.m.Y{7.11..7T k n'`6.A ,1 i r+ y`{ y-'Vie,,1.f.: �° sf. � � r'.• rim' et:- _7r K.3 �t , • , ti : .?(1 ( i▪ r* Y• .�xt Y 44 u I. err s ,s: ,.,r,SK '••1 ,,, 1 tnF-t - %� ' pNF nN': 6ri q�-x i e„Nt k� '1�N L`$''r .Y` 1 j k4�� ,� •°y •t 1i .e*� ti�, ti . 0. Rcr ti 4" 1•dt.� }•s. ,,r. R + L S-' Fy 'f �'' F'ri sS,1 u }j'F�(X'"'r,`,'xi r n74 t Jse � 8.• M �-, .<,, ,x ` '�C,,3'a.3t r �y,,Aak;.y, t:E., ,I; `sPyS : tiro .� 7'. +!'kJ s.,, ▪y 4-1S:^ 'j a., ,a.'}1 !'n` �,.,..w r'1A''' ,i�y�' t,,, r.� z 4i,. ..3 A, n ,. : e� � � .�Y 3 } is sryp��1 7 S 'r� J��F `^3-� L i,�" h fir, �t "'sr�a��7 � rW r fl{�r�� '. `rd_, i,.. -,� 1 t' Ly ( ri n^�,�y�/yllyv^j�� iqsdt - . s 4•kk”i Ai x',3'gs r L .. �.,j ;(r• • f Tr. I�P ' ,�1 1 '7 . sc „. aT TITLE coMP.ANy ' c . of �v ashington, Inc. . oRCEANO. io99so-'g „; IaPCRTANT: • This is not a Plat of Survey.It is hunrsned as a c:nveMMce to locate tnt Isrsd ira�d�C • hereon wun reference to Settees ane other Jane.No liability is assumed by reason of rehanu Carron, IP • •t -- i 1 I a t i '1 -6. • •l` 1 • 0 1 j • O L--�Z .1 i —.me wr -wa I jIt4 a - . 1'44,• i ii . 1 �1 L. • • I 11 -: I !1 ' ''1 I `. , • ' ( •N k • • . ..�.:!�� - lam.^• • •i .• ..- ... �� yr 0• I _ • FIE . Ho ,•t&5 1 — : ::`'•"W£ i h;;0, p .,Cd r•. r : j'.:k 9409060421 ti • ORDER NO. ; IMPORTANT:This Is not a Plal of Survey.II Is furnished as a convenience to locate the land Indicated r hereon with reference to streets and other land.No liability Is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. • la • f I/D/f O T (J O /, J� /, ..,2 3 -S �15 1 f r..•1" .• '.i .x; /�{_' P•+((/ SSY• �• • ,i � ,..!.:7.37;:ii.:::z.„:-...:::24,7,,..;7:•.:6.,:l., • I y Ai;}I• F_ \ - iiii — ... �a t t • t-s` c i ti r.. ',4'.4:::'Y .411 ♦ ir- 4s I i H 2. • \- .1 i . P1 tiVg,' + r • s . 1 � - — � Jr4. ,, ,a-1 •.I iii—, ------ - ----- --• - ' » r 1.1 WI ` i Y .1rr I- r -` , 13 :;.II L ' .. t —_'_._—._....--_..— .__—__._..— ___.,I It_•1•Ilf�.11r•1 ---_— �_f C :- tom ^ r . • '1.g.t' tl • . .' . .':2'..I;11:,triV.,.._,,•-';..4.i),",t'.:!--;4"5 terilmmttt,__ K, G gi 4.' a• :t bta0, '• 1: 2 r: 17 • I% - ? c, y . f;Y� \ • ,,,,, rsi.rr _ «, �, S7 % w I K c w, --—----- - • 1 R FA/AK K a 5 /, , .- 1 L'°t . u to:. I. _ - ,'€� s I- 94o9060421. OIIDEf1 N0. IMPORTANT:This Is not a Plat ol Survey.II Is furnished as a convenience to locale the land Indicated iv I hereon with reference to shoots and other land.No liability Is assumed by reason ol reliance hereon. • — fr-v/ //OJf s'� UV �/S(� /�,�Z3 �S t II X co i " 1 i. 1° \ 1 1 g • .I (tot Y .3 • ]., ,1, • 1 • ,, . \•• • 4 k Ph�a. ,; may,? • „ .+r , + N c n�-. ^ty1ya z t 1 ki K �— :c — 1311.72_I L � y ��sa c ; w Y• . It E' 4 kx5� tux 2 :::: • bi I t yl!V ''"8 1.r v b,�^1 , A ` • `II 0♦ . i j Ica , ,'• 3§ :4,-0 :. ► '___ _ L Z:i i4� i 4 11.it2irick is Z • •ti ,• �P�s.- it 'fnis t �� ► y • . x .• ►rf r�.7 r{.....'1SS . { ^ /30• 1.�.. .R t' •• -}' B •- a$..ag 4� t., +'Y �'I AlARFNAKOS �,, '',,..VI:: s 't . � `` n ., .::.x.'•..N:eY.,S n. . . r .r.•...,•, ... .. , .....w.+..«..y+...rr...r.,rr.I...x.n.-..»...Y k.. ........ ... � .,..... ... PARCEL 36 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON and CLAYTON (JOHN) CARLSON, each as their separate estate, as to an undivided one-half interest ' e and MIRAIM E. MICHAEL, LEROY MICHAEL, LESTER MICHAEL, ELEANOR (ELNORA) KUSSOW, WILLIAM H. WILSON, JACQULIN MILLER, ESTELLE . i RAGSDALE, MERLYN PAGEL, OLIVE KARVIA, DALE KAPPELL, FRANK KAPPELL, JANET V. COSLOR, BETTY CARPENTER, GILBERT BREHM, DUANE . BREHM, BARBARA BRYLES, ADRIS BUTLER and GARY F. BASS, each as their separate estate, as to the remainder '''l Record Owners HELEN A. BERRY and J. P. BERRY, husband and wife, or their respective heirs and devisees e Reservation of coal and minerals , i 1 W. V. BRADLEY and VIOLA I. BRADLEY, husband and wife and OIVA J. CARLSON and MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and wife, or their heirs and devisees Agreement for water system ,' :2 UNKNOWN d' Numerous judgment and/or liens against Eugene Carlson O O UNKNOWN O Numerous judgment and/or liens against Clayton (John) Carlson. 01 CD PATSY A. CARLSON ter Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson CI STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Henry Gossage, aka Willie Wilson, Jr. Judgment against Willie Wilson Judgment against William B. Robertson, aka John Harris; William G. Nelson; John Williams, William Wilson; Jack Williamson; William N. Robertson; Larry Normans; and John Wilson; d/b/a A & B Investments; Little Castle; Mr. Bills; and Billco; and Debra L. Carmen and Jennifer Shong, d/b/a/ Mr. Bills Drive-In & Restaurant Judgment against Gene Carlson aka Gene Carlsen UNKNOWN Unidentified claimants based on the assertion that the former interest of the Consolidated Coal Company was a right of way and not a fee simple interest. • UNKNOWN Interest of the Estate of W. V. Bradley arising from the fact that no order completing the estate has been filed. .r n ..n,,-k ..e .x.i,,t. ..0 s.`x`e1.,,- - xz' � _ . OI, .; -ii-' f c `#•% 7 �4.4!,.. , V -- r 2p tpr. ' .:w r:,` ,r w.H'�,. t[iu � - 'r'^ -44'4 ' "d{.11 i,S4gs .�. ;r • + _ + - t .L f� .t +' r } :. 'v5 4 ::sr .r nt,� s, �� `a E _. w',.�yts a ".tir 'h� «ir t s r+, .1�+ { ,r ..i. , h • , r •S r -.+ < 1 x d 4. b..x;$ � r ,' s�; f{ R , t tag v • ` ,,r '" h :' •e fk'' �' �"�,,+3 P" �4 ",�"� k r1, r r Y+ ,fir ` ua t. l 4 4k a 7{ '"b.j r: ' L'i,.6k, ,J? •y1�. _.�a v x4 1 Y'r rr"..-"" w rr -.,yyl^. tx�{ i ..: ;•� «• ,ram-+ r rtx ¢< .`x� 7? 5.�a. • • 0 _ JERRY BENNETT, d/b/a/ KINGS COURT Judgment against William Wilson, et al. PATSY A. CARLSON, aka PATRICIA A. CARLSON • Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES Lien against Wayne C. Carlson RAM REMANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING, INC. Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. Judgment against Gene A. Carlson and Arvilla Carlson j UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Three federal tax liens against Gene A. and Arvilla Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: r4 Beginning at the a point on the south boundary line of the northeast O quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24 North, U, Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, said point being 202 O feet west of the southeast corner of said northeast quarter of the a) southeast quarter of said Section 29; O thence in a straight line south 10°12' east 32 feet; 'r thence curving to the left with a 10° 51.5' curve through a 10°50' of curvature a distance of 99.08 feet; thence in a straight line south 21°2' east 285 feet; thence curving to the right with a 13°24 ' curve through 17°48' curvature, a distance of 132.08 feet; thence south 3°14 ' east 810 feet to a point 50 feet west of the southeast corner of said Section 29; thence east 50 feet to said section corner; thence north along the east line of said Section 29 a distance of 1315 feet to the northeast corner of thr southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 29; thence west 202 feet to the point of beginning. am+ r' ., k :�;:yZ" s ', - y.5 7 s` -'" met_ R-C8"""t r. xaiN • PARCEL 37 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON and CLAYTON (JOHN) CARLSON, each as their respective separate estates in indeterminate interests Record Owners CONSOLIDATED COAL COMPANY, a corporation Easement grantee UNKNOWN water pipe easement GEORGE W. TIBBETTS and REBECCA A. TIBBETTS, husband and wife and JOHN M. GOODE and IDA M. GOODE, husband and wife, or their respective unknown heirs Reservation of coal, oil or clay r4 SPOUSES OF THE VESTEES, if any :1 (Homestead rights if spouses live on property) rr O HORIZONS UNLIMITED, INC. co Agreement regarding water rights and easement O CD Q STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES w1 Lien against Wayne C. Carlson CD STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Gene Carlson, aka Gene Carlsen RAM REMANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING, INC. Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENT CO. Judgment against Gene Carlson and Arvilla Carlson UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Three federal tax liens against Gene Carlson and Arvilla Carlson yr -,. pp ITT,F T+r a a Q3 z—#""• ice r u 1 actE ,1- :, f 7� u f.Y�.,;'„ _ ., ,.R `�'d..��a,#.. ° 'w s.F.J.�",".1: } > � R:��,+t31 • i i-�4 :. '1' I I "• `t. ..t'4T y x',R yo 4t°v74, e�'S `' P;I'llOa'`'`tsl A•41•(i''�'1'^` :"y Y 2 '9•t• • ' t, ys A{ " `" n!C# y,"T,3y a rrqs`v;yG t i t r . i t x d !. 3`!' "€ +ix x� C K ti r• c ? 'ay `- k 1+ ;�".t •fir.a x` '� fi. • c s Y -. �r� �f,}vx�Yj Y ij1 �y` "c, t �' ,� � {{��wrt, ai �r+e, r+ _-� ' �r Y 4 -1 4 L N rSak N+' lSi�F! Mt. tt`� � T J 14 t:0;.y ff' 0,4w as.x 4r a• r• -r r �y ,� i Z e >4 k[ a "b � r t3�4 ��Ct v s •4 r h 5 S'1 � 1k 1 »� x/ .@ 6�y+ .'•- �-t`k I r� r q x �c � 3•ox< �1 r .x 1+.'{• '�'-i..` '•' n�rp;�`'�"t r is i a''�1'7 ft t � �, ya q 9 •,ryk >2 "+}•mtt'c s - J, n-'+ {A+i%G.M q.} ,Sz.., �_TZ yse r.� t.�y y S .err ;'r y -x+i''1A.6 1 ~` r. • ..'yr•a... J i, i}�" �n'7' 5? ♦ t4.•eY''• t .tF .... d� ' k,• PATSY A. CARLSON aka PATRICIA A. CARLSON Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: i,.. That portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 29; running thence north on • section line 381 feet; thence west 1168 feet, more or less to the east boundary of Sunset Highway; thence southeasterly along the east margin of Sunset Highway 384 feet to the south line of said northeast quarter of the southeast 4 quarter; :2 thence east along said south line of the northeast quarter of tht Osoutheast quarter 1121 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. CD C CI d' 01 • • • • • • atrS -� ,�, ,�q t k �. _� Y s a a5r •sy's? 4 :...sue, rG .fii ,�,� .• ,> sdr-Sf"1+^`�►e+•...i6Yti••�R `t 11;. ' ® Ii_.,. - ^r ,:;F. . `r, K '� E�i -:a_ .3 :r �r., F9 1 k� fK• ei R�S" 'i` J �i`�9 " +1 _.; • ,:. ` ' w1c. -.; C '�, • � t# •,;�� ..9�1 �.�y. :t'{`'� k N � Y}li,.:. ',�'�.ty rRr•L 7'!}�. ?{- v_t t'3; -r..i •,pLsr .'i '� 'S'�'r -'!"''f^•p�iY f" 4. ,' A' Y ,* r `• r j"4" .Y '..f. F y 4 ,�„J0.i.r F'+l al t s i r ,,c og t ! .fi f # � .. Y • r ti•4 t C cy PARCEL 44 JAMES L. MARENAKOS, as his separate estate . Record Owner • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: • That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the north half of the north half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said • Section 12; • ' thence south O1°11'57" west,along the west line of Section 12, a v distance of 325.64 feet to the southwest corner of said subdivision; `,2 thence south 86°42' 14" east a distance of 30.02 feet to the easterly • margin of 164th Avenue Southeast and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; QD thence continuing south 86°42' 14" east along the south line of said • O subdivision, a distance of 1239.33 feet to the northwesterly margin Q) of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company transmission line right of p way; d' thence north 49°12'42" east, along said northwesterly margin, a Q) distance of 56.05 feet to the east line of said subdivision; thence north 01°21'09" east, along the east line of said subdivision, a distance of 179.07 feet; thence north 86°43'48" west a distance of 1281.47 feet to the easterly margin of 164th Avenue Southeast; • thence south O1°11'57" west along said margin a distance of 217.53 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;Xsaid parcel described consists of 6.3&4 acres. • �7 r qe• e :+ w a T. � .:,r...-. .. �� +�- j a -�s` �. 1.A2C14.4.1� ._ •. .'it. r +.�-s w, ; _. .fr y ' e�,�S' t f 7 m 1 • PARCEL 64 MARTHA I. CARLSON, WAYNE CARLSON, EUGENE CARLSON, CLAYTON CARLSON, who also appears as JOHN CARLSON, and VIOLA I. BRADLEY, each as their separate estate; and the Heirs and Devisees of WILLIAM VERNON BRADLEY, who acquired title as W. V. BRADLEY, deceased Record Owners ISAAC COOPER and ALICE MARY McEACHERN and ALFRED HACKETT Reservation of coal and minerals • MATHILDA CORKLE • Reservation of coal and minerals UNKNOWN Unpaid creditors of the estate of William Vernon Bradley, deceased UNKNOWN • Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Wayne 1 Carlson O UNKNOWN CD Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Eugene O Carlson dUNKNOWN • Judgment creditors and other involuntary lienholders of Clayton Carlson, also known as John Carlson VIOLA BRADLEY (as to the interest of the Estate of William Vernon Bradley by reason of a community property agreement with the deceased) 0. J. CARLSON and KELLY CARLSON Current taxpayer for property W. V. BRADLEY and VIOLA BRADLEY, husband and wife and OIVE J. CARLSON and MARTHA I. CARLSON, husband and wife Agreement for easement for water pipe PATSY A. CARLSON, also known as PATRICIA A. CARLSON Judgment against Wayne A. Carlson STATE OF WASHINGTON Judgment against Wayne Chester Carlson Judgment against Gene Carlson, a/k/a Gene Carlsen STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES Lien against Wayne C. Carlson RAMM REMANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTING, INC. , Judgment against Engine Exchange, Inc. , Gene Carlson, l r. a • S {� ,j 1 a'• iufd •vr y • 7 . • individually and on behalf of Engine Exchange, Inc. , Aravilla B. Carlson, individually and the marital community composed of Gene Carlson and Aravilla B. Carlson • f_ . NORTHWEST AUDIT & ADJUSTMENNTlCon and Aravilla Carlson • Judgment aga inst Gene A. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ' • Three federal tax liens against Gene and Aravilla Carlson PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: • • • • • Beginning at the southwest corner of Section 28, Township 24 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; thence east 50 feet; thence north 3° west 812 feet; thence on a 12° curve to the left a distance of 148.03 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on the west line of said Section which is 990 feet north of the southwest corner of said Section; v4 thence south to the point of beginning. CD O d' a • • • ti F. ..r-- �.... :. • - . rye yy.Y ,t( ,y+• ...:l m ��'54 ik', ._t.LE:,:�hLSv'�f.. ITW!•'.rtr.... .; �_.�:. •.it f<;; Cy-?J;erf^. +�w . �•:x'•i,tr??f.�4,°:X+` .., � ?"�. is}'-•'. ,•„ , a •�, , J , it i e 1 No•N4TT(MINI d xxJlfirNl MO7'If9Y(NG.S) au a(rrw rltl �\yl NaC,11'M•J(AAEASI ' � 1 AtMUOff.4S)omit la lb*AYESE. _nary_- r 2 • ate- I - - J ----- oa..•! .rar 11 _4 Ii a' �1 sao- 1 I r. N aATD' 7 . 5,s i , ;I A4: i - .I �i cit 1.,,--. 1 1 (f.ua IYrr.Ina,/MYR S N•a_a j Norrru r Mt! • ar a I , " . t 3 u -- u 117 No rrarr NJ it a'3 a vI e �I: : —4-7-——Ao•Lrsr —__-- �---- Yfr IfL•CCl t} . { ►ur(44r.AMNt at Nnl� 1, I•I ky F I M a V 1t I C 1 . a TZ F ;r �s 1 n f /Sibs AVE.St om,y. \.I qM a a URA uAU wo a(NMI) f• ZUJ11 IOW) r4AI.J7(RCAS) nurr(auAoenn Na7•r1')1"ff WW1 JINtdi(WO 1 'k', Ro•a•JO•N(A(w J..E1A•�CO41Cl�r) SZXJJO((NW MO rt i1 =`ti 11 Li • r, a is a 4 �•.: oq F T ^�_ t. r� l' \o ,..9i i �i $ deb+'+ ,o i N O j;; ,E acr a R SCORDIND CERTIRICATE SURVSYOR•S CERTIFICATE 00008 SNCi1NSERSI INC. >",•• ., •M.I.r•.« e•• RECORD Of SURVEY C Ss ,. .1..r r.•......r.... .tea... w—or .Y r . Ir..m1......v. w 4205.14SUJ,AVENUE 7431.11.EAS1 .Yrsn.r n.. ,. r ..-I..+..r Iw re.•... ....Ix 1� n tfY001w: BEuEVUE.vwS,-NaGTOw ykll(Y/ DODDS ENGINEERS. INC. ' u,rr..s rT,,1 Ih ..-r.••r..�3 rRA•S['{IE,d CRUSY_ BURNS EA0 ONSAEUC7/ON (TNN AAr RAN6•el op , noo.. ..i LIY. ... ........... face .^4 Y� R/S/701h AYE.NE0,1 -• I1s,e If'J— ,,,,,,,,,, .�,,,,,.,,, .,,o,a, �p p EE[LEWf.WA fJOOd AR.. gyp. _ err 4.fp Z.1Q awl./MMJ YRNO!.>JVO[N Soot fry z . I f t 9506199ooI C - ;x ; RKFERENcrS - W PARCEL A: - W di TIIE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION I) Record of Survey by Jones and Associates,recorded in Volume 7 of Surveys,page 129. - 2 2= 14,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH.RANGE 5 EAST,WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN.IN KING records of King County,Washington. ^ Z 55 4 57 COUNTY.WASHINGTON;EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF OF THE NORTH 50000 FEET LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF 771E WEST 30 FEET OF SAID 2)Piss of Cedar Cress Estates recorded in Volume 95 of Plats,page 5e,records of King County, • W g SUBDIVISION;AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN TIIE EAST WashingtonTH i! 011. a 35. — d �, 225.00 FEET OF THE SOU e61.00 FEET OF THE NORTII968.0O FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION;AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING 3) Plat of Briar Hills recorded in Volume 100 of Plats,pap Sl,records oFKing County. 0 f m it COI INT(SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632253 FOR SOUTHEAST 121111 Washington a ' o of STREET. a 1 N 4) Record of Survey by Ken Oyler,recorded In Volume 71 of Surveys•page 271,records 0 i PARCEL B: King County,Washington. a 1 5)Record of Siam by Concept Engineers,Inc..Recorded In Volume 11 of Surveys,page I. x THE EAST HALF OF 711E WEST HALF OF TIIE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1 a N H,TOWNSIP 23 NORTH,RANGES EAST,WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN.IN KING rtwrds of King County,Washington f 1 MPl COUNTY.WASIIINOTON;EXCEPT TIM EAST HALF OF TILE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;AND EXCEPT THE 6)Record of Storey by W A H Pacific recorded in Volume 92 of Surveys,page 33,records of j EAST 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD;AND King Candy Waslungtaa EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 632233. SURVEYOR'S NOTES W I)All Title Iafmmadon shown on this map has been euucted from Chicago Title Insurance J Q W no Company Plat Certificate Commitment No.423111,dated April I I.1994 a 1:00 A.M..end tcl 2 w supplemented April13,1995,and April It,1995.In preparing this snap,DEI has conducted i ti4IF.i • Incswan of Independent title search nor Is DEI s of any tide issues affecting the surveyed property OQ ,, other than those Yawn on the map and disclosed by du referenced Plat Certificate 0 ' p r'1. 1.The purpose of this survey Is to prepare Record of Survey for Btrnsuad Commitment DEI has cnhed wholly on Chicago Title Insurance Company representations h .,enooe of p .� uction. . CrxtstrCommitmentthe title's condition to prepare this survey and shetefore DEI qualifies the maps accuracy and W j N O 2.Lot Area•2,732,731 d square feel(82.73 t Act) completeness to that eaters 3.This survey represents visible physical Improvement conditions settling on April 17, 2)TAU Isa Odd traverse survey A Unto SETeC Five second combined electronic tots station 1995.All survey control Indicated es-found-was recovered for the project in April war used to measure she angular and distance relationships between the controlling -found- ' monumentatioe es shown Closureratios of the inverse met or exceeded those specified in 1995. WAC 332-130-090.Distance measuring equipment a mr has been calibrated en N G.S.Baseline A.This survey was prepared for the exclusive use of BurrW ead Construction Rights to within one year of the date of this survey. - rely on or use this survey do not extend 10 any unnamed party without express • i tM recertification by Dodds Engineers,Inc and/or the Professional Lard Surveyor 3) AN themes we I.for. W f• re 6e whose seal appears hereon. 4) Alt monuments shown as found were field visited the week of April 17,1995. }1 g ft i Bowl Sethi of Blnrr ,-,..:!i s- NIt'2Y17-W between monument No..lot l and 1152,foundb in place end described below per 1 F r • City of Renton horironW control network published November 15,1994. W U t Id q2i F' Rtkttnce M9namcml Q i .T 0 e 9:s No.11151•31i'domed bras surface discw/puncA mask at the constructed intersection of N.E. , E 4h SL(S.E 121th St.)and leech Ave.SE. W i:k sr,:[= i No.1132-I'Ras bra f wd s entice disc at she coued Intaudion of N.E.sash Ss.(S E.Beth Q i Sc). and IUth Ave-S.E. 3 E 1 7'F e I:a - •I I I1 _ I U '1_ t - 1.r i:); ? I OS—bS ' 1'e'1 U : •• IS 5N a Z 2 I 'dI Q 5:,.8 • . • ,.!