Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA99-111
455 W whza-z+-e 3 E n31-z+-s RENTON 7 , 4 "d *e■-•, ; ,p 1 O loss I _ --r � ` .4alat ej 6 x 0 / I Z I S � 4 �' 4 Y -i-- it k /�Ejrlib iiS _y_ e�r ' e� Sif e ��04�1"iFS�6" mqim,�' B' 'o�IF. �l. � a W o W _;It � I 6 i1 'L t a' ; Ii m # , 1 J <v 9' •. ' G, Rm P� � . _. I I` Rs1./' - se I „ � %Ai nt . » n 7. — " Z4 . ' wm rt�I - iw �l I, er � �b9Rm a ,m - Y ®;�' IN . F` + F m 4k r� • t. �fCrod. , v . A. ® Z. � • e i V $Mj Z a o , , . ' \\ I'''. -m - \� N . m39, • _ S� . 14._ ..�........ ......._...�._ .. N.. m1 �`.,,k.` ..:.s ...`f� '� I III �''� • • illiilifig E1=°11(1s'0 '1 Illifaill W. • Lu ,., A 2A.13 o ✓ 1 ,' ,■o psEI a U) Cr ir'''''lay \ /t'.. IFEAlimarr__ ar AmTirr PA0IIHNI. 4 _, poi ii-. ill / , 1 ,s4qpIrmr Ai s . 4 10,r u , M ,Ah /AM p•, IrTi4 Fr Ill-Area —A 'W.VBE iiii. !Ai ilk , Amir.i \ .74MM61111tkAim , Ira x r. C2*e{rrpse21"az, \*1\ - . L. I, I .Alrillii.'-' -Mil Awl. i` ,,A am i. 1 r IA ROOF FRAMING NOTES ALL BEAMS A HEADERS TO BE//B D.F./1 D 201 WALLS,U.N.O. ALL BEAMS S HEADERS TO BE A110 D.F./2 a 2x/WALLS,U.N.O. VENTED BLOCKING OVER SUPPORTS Fns. ROOF PITCHES TO BE 5:12 OTss. BEARING WALLS ARE SHOWN SHADED FRAME-OVER!ARE SHOWN SHADED PROVIDE B.IZ S.F.OF ROOF VENTILATION I HALF AT EAVES IL HALF AT IIEYMUM T FEET ABOVE EAVES I ALL TRUSSES. -SHALL BEAR MANUFACTURERS STAMP qla qNO. -.ALL ME INSTALLED M BRACED TO MANUFACTURERS 1 1�� SK SPECIFICATIONS -SKULL NOT BE FIELD ALTERED WITHOUT PRIOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF DETAILS CALCULAT CRIS• W -SMALL HAVE DESIGN DETA M DRAWINGS ON SITE FOR v^ PAYO INSPECTOR roof 'framing plan y4„_,,ro„ 7 r 1rj illis P PIis 41 '-/ is'6." /Z$ E/ 4-8' / 4! "f 4!9"/ -741 /&I-g I 3Ld't3La/ &-o" y • `ad - I1 ' W }�- IG�EOG 9�J-6c/S _ _ L UJ bedroom 2 Q �� bah 2 o `�� w.i. . __ 1 0 s Lm Ma- �n x T O ma. a•I'"' 0 4 (� — � 0 O nail p I - =Fir W I _� � ,Ifi **�}} `� ':off IFS �� I �i'Diay.� ;y; „•9 iiiiii�iiiiiiAlp_° bedroom 3 '° , ut.I. c pR-. !d 5\ _A 0 _p-'pme� Ilopv \`�`© a .A.,,Tp M O� Q tp 1C�—, \ I— uN!- ,,n,, r1.7 bel w , , master bed_ F p • t �p X. b1 e ,r �ii JI I A excercise d=�k 4--• TT �• \ T\ 4 TI - = � \ \\ sr... _ T (t)� ,-+T. PI-4 tip _:cam © a C- ix it- : oL5,4 TD FRA =N4 DA,....., .-�I I I I I II I I I I I I /3-6'/ 7LC'" y'r,�-el' /4v�3'-1°"/I'/ s'-o / S-o" y1o"-4. / rvo" / s c io("59 i4'o 0 Ms,46 ro ,eDw.L.. eX/Il Ol / +�• / ®ADO CPT* -/ - ----__--_ / Toe PA ATL FLOOR PLAN NOTES- Q ADO (1)ASS TANes TO...IA..L .= TOP pLATC ALL BEAMS HEADERS TO BE IDS D.F.SIebM WALLS.U.N.O. «JoTe. Ae_L A• WALLS To St P.-4, p A Te ^�� ALL BEAMS A HEADERS TO BE An10 O.F.A25WA WALLS,U.N.O. OS A D(�) Ass 6 q SOLID BLOCKING OVER SUPPORTS TeP Pa ATL ��1 WINDOOCEING A ALL PLUMBING PENETRATIONS ,-S WINDOW SWALLS T NOMINALSTUDS WIDTH S HEIGHT ©S A OLT T )1 A0 EXTERIOR WALLS OI STUDSgrO.C.. LA oAT AS A 9`I6 ' INTERIOR WALLS TO BE 2OB 2a6 JOISTS O.C.,U.N.O. S 4 MAIN FLOOR FRAMING TO BE 2a8 JOISTS®16"O.C.,U.N.O. OS L OE TAN as L UPPER FLOOR FRAMING TO BE 2612 JOISTS e1S"O.C.,U.N.O. See P[TAz._ A (PLAN INDICATES DIRECTION) X ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED STANDARD TOP PLATE TO BES'O.U.N.O. -.Nis TEES.[Hatt+e N• TOOF ST Mx..., N L upper floor plan k • "1:7kr rMn • PA _ - <,I16Aru rRw•. nA ONZ RAIIFIAR vt-4 I • Minw°6+oot PlkA/n�V'neoy Hai (MIJ"Pf NCG O. O)Nen-Fr, II N.AwL, Ina•6'4� &OAS 4'oL eT.D ' Nv BA Mrr ss 110, Y4i' w'F'vua.- 7 P 4 I� 'Nee �fi Au.-f,MfAn (2)r•K w AS REo'O. P,f H'A Au-TNPJ4o --_ 1 l��a�; I /M ryµ It 1 W/aA II' x/lu'oez VOA EI0, 4PH FneeA V yp. jl. , O S•o°.To MIP)." 'ryN4R w Y e •x�D II rt+N6 D . Prn nAH„F Y& NOlkri.JaIN'( -S lkT/nnnzND- Aro PLpRt. li • . Af'arae. fyyrJlOE SUfD 1114.114.� p 'WO AD. Noaoaavwl P�w�i Ffa'P WKWOA(i �tei[ III ' H .H66. I Agee Pr0.H - !` ++aff F n is- pe-TAIL A DETAIL O Aee I Jot s�cE dt3311-1111 (I)rr,MAR. e4I To JD - rPPo'AAL.. s _ - I n ._ _-._ _-- -- ----- _ _. I / ul'-Y eewnHeNOAnON6 11 Polk ax IN 6.0.1,ec ?sY'Z 4� z11 -2° Q-4 , 0-9 _—Y 11'-� / &LC,' 01 7" �-o/3.3 y 3'-q/ lo-o g ENO..4.1, ONLY. 1 LATERAL REZTRAI KIT river,T'$. 1 'L- T Y ^ IpETAIL C. PANEL (LRP) (GA)/fio`D.I S ->' •. I I i7 u� hC$ A.IL 10 - F _. GoIr.TF, M , II N.18.3aoc A`. I��i- ��" =, = 6x6 � - 4, A din 9u1 .° i1*I\ • il- e"� • bA.8.U3zroc- -- r : a •=n w { nll.lp �Q t III' y a .I .o , .c �i r7 - W -o p I;� a i 2- ar gore. _ :t -(,6,41I duo A V%II o a Q ., M a- it, cr ,- III, I1. zC ) . I r% 5 ~ -• - '"L'] 51' - d /f -deck I xw 4 nwr o L n oIS -2 d �I�� • ® v �. <© 0 4 11 ['ETAxL D "o _ I w"�w,--F - Ira..•J�a. *,. +.b Q teat room a �� a --- �_�_ foyer - IIt _�� r'� 1.� �� o� ......: , ors �'} p �" 6..asarai.1 �\ N _r Cr r'.o7og1A2R- _` / II den ] O // ^✓ ,M+N I Il _.g,. v y .•• .. . 'I) 1• ��✓o+Y _ _ ''wAus-Fa of P,.,.. .irl!.. !I j: (44..v.,,,A-7:14.14 4' ri.4 C4) T _ se 12 D.Frl+<2A1.`�A. '.PJ!'L/ I✓a e u a.. .9 1 • °' i pure eu AT�w.. R, T S P n Lam- ww s 1 r��T ]. r SWAN tNIo P -JOIN/ IN / Z'-a" �21,'Ai�fo" )1j2'� (e) e<3o I naHDEn.°H II`5 T { ice • I ✓j I B i II I p 1 ro' 4qr I I I R I I H .H 6 .''b 9v - 91-6" _ '}'2 3''Id - 9' 4'a� 5-0 5]-d' 10� / '_6Y 11 /�,s ... ue-o I 11 9HEAFN TRAIJHFER a EXTERIOR WALL • H H al'_0" SHEA- ALL SCHEDULE A "'---- - - -- .Sw e<....1 Aa., . DD fhlEiity �1r1Nj2 HAj 1 or. ErgesLIS^•^H H FLOOR PLAN NOTES r o tr.r. 62 eF ..«._,,. PIA.r•In P. A "056,./WO113(non<a 6•0 c �Tadq'� 61.��-np� K4.83 TS4. .rn,no, '••' II ALL BEAMS 8 HEADERS TO BE ea D.F.XI®US WALLS.U.N.O. O Ow DIt es.,. Te mOULA D.za' RCLPW ,oEor•Y•I'ntmor waits only)'. 16 a a6'oc I r L D-•,pe• 44 ra H ALL BEAMS 8 HEADERS TO BEAa10 D.F.eIa 201 WALLS,U.N.O. re bL.,-is-IC. s zo'Z SOLID BLOCKING OVER SUPPORTS ADD (t) ASS xec,czur To WAaL TOP PLATE PIA r•]HA pl1 /16'056,wl SE(0113')n•ilsa A'oc M< FIREBLOCKING BALL PLUMBING PENETRATIONS 0 Ancnor.•(iMPror wolfs only): 1660 rp<. • on-�TP.)�S•:,I�,]�L oPSL �I23�'1 ,,,,y..rp,,,y _ _ WINDOW SIZES ARE NOMINAL WIDTH&HEIGHT 10 LOLA E .o SAT ...IL WALL ADD(Sl ASS e,slitir- of s 106 n0 r�Oa.w w2• EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE all STUDS Fp 16'O.G. D.T ST Te ..JAa� vex PaA,'e PIA r•350 MI 16'05B,w/66(0113')na"s 03.o c 1�ryy,¢, q...� p� �, rrs INTERIOR WALLS TO BE OR STUDS a Ill"O.C.,U.N.O. MATE Anchorage(interior wells only). 16 p 03'o.c uy 1,.1, ir�_`� : I/79-4 S I i6+ 39: ar MAIN FLOOR FRAMING TO BE all JOISTS a le O.C.,U.N.O. 0 Aso(S) ASS'SOTS,' To WALL TOP I-W,K j"''WI�- / UPPER FLOOR FRAMING TO BE 2012 JOISTS g 16"O.C.,U.N.O. PIAX ••]eep w/6"(01101..03.o.c �J�r�y� I PLAN INDICATES D RECTI)N I O LOG A T E lox a,' OVER.HH woo(a) now use min r nominal•Oa O adjoining panel T .•_r I� ` s/jZ}I AL Z ALL WOOD IN CONTACT&NTH CONCRETE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED P AncnO ap(interior wails only). I6 n e 3.0 c. J °�WOw•�••� F. STANDARD TOP PLATE TO BE ltd.U.N.O. s eae<NT.I Te Wz.apeW MEAECL in use O LATERAL F�BTRAINT PANEL O L•co WEE()ETAS,,�z.ioe..D NZA°ee - NOTES elr,n�ilaw with 'Own wllrtee pneumatically T K - SeSO 7 main floor plan L eAKTy.TD <3 e. Moira edges.5p." H.tl:p< kAII_II-CY ODING PCR 1.4 wTUD.T 914 00 ICI___i•4 RAMPS al✓oo. MD[H6 RJ[ 1•4PruP>DVi 00.vA' .i1RNlb IGR O' WI b.wD 2. IX4GKING-� r-2• FIooR,lolnr5 eL MP 6WD- P fWLxl R-19 dPf YJ•ULlQ4TJ dL`/MldYs '�/4146 RiWOa>D-. P1�'ar. CONE IVNRNM- tl 9 PP WIIAWS -Nee'X --F-11 seer 1xyLL.now I! moo _ 10.DIR.AIb ,I R-11 FPALArwN S - F _ i.1;L1I9 1.c.PR TR.MILL R ` �, ip i! i` 0 w, 'AY 6.6x.Q merit _ xy}},x.dAD44'-d PAMPA. 41 _ - J O �gI��7i1 i A4 TV!.RT.91lFLR RYWD 9"7, a,(le PROM WDD Ihx OD%.RYWD Z.b...-..- yf e e ¢9oLIO PVT 2V P�91FL R.WIyY'"Id 1,�,ri•I/1� R-Px IN6[L 4H[.TNINb Z I�3'PLYMDPD OR-1 d�i� t I IHD�RNR•HTI M a b-e)OA[IZ 4"c011..9LAe ��4uu���ud 4�'4 MR LOUT T4 Tim RYW.?oD RAN Qe.TT� PLAN PER RID Z / Z•i�TDRPlO 'z • swill" PROM GGH END 4 MIL.VD I I ..-o c. a _ R-IN Bf�1 I / ' N N9LIIISION I I t, It J. 4 rL.41 • 11Ef1 MI f Pw.6R<oE. - -- c a 50uD NPR Mq uaHR. j� / 4'LONGRGGIE 9LAO a)e4el'e aYr -514.Jr.oLL R w/ vsFLgOR TwNr uurn (� !AV R-191w u1 .q eA re axfT/BM. -� I�x 41 MIL V Q 4y D Pad o0 JwF aY.D.O. ND OF FND „�g���� ii e i r4'BRAr,x11iF F[i. H."nbN G B+o 44'O'uD BC D1t1N k •MJ aW"00 WA)wd Na19G oece {.1 � x'g N2 TIUIr BC. 9PIF R1 Z .5.WD Me It it.2 T ,�� -b MIL V LeP 12"8 3LINED •'� wPr W/B� (t 4P - -I 1+G PS P111(L IC ' Y{ " P>REA ��j��t��1 OEM,* L.FTv wALL FTLra BDrfaM J' )M w/�y, 10 AD P40 l'[ GB�EOVN 9PMY (1 d F; •a11, l ^• .1� .IdFq-'�RT 4D'oG�l� .. ,Fly • 1 GLL� I FT ORO(N MIL VQ L4I 1,_i, O,%e From PfDD D 3-J•11+fRFMC[di llt 1 Y41kR¢B29'Oc [• I w C"aBGaY 7 1 Y x, II- ".(eMCY-J PCR rNo-�. • •L'` UP R,D VMLL S. L 11_ll R.OJ,I �. ~(Bw-K) H( FIDFG T2pV FMQD(1N.R1N6 ���IU�tl2�i y*4 BYM(.ONT O C .2.4 IP*Lahr V• �I TONS. ¢ III "� -•AN��MOF10 +1 PC11P J 4-_ j� ' 1--_�• • \� • IGR F!O PN�H I.4 THRUM RAIM.BCR DCIWEO-1 �yb j, 44'VfP.1 q� 4 PERT" •t6` G b B.fii J - ife 5 F'x'Y !ACM 9,ND FTG.DRN 1p +•14 NCR P 2Y c.l __ I� Peb T 4 rEFF FT.. We.-. /4r K e OG. PTb ORNN -�t� 4 e16R OL VEFT DRAIN I-4 - MaM'P.a MY.,.Sopal O�arage foundation detail ©••ra•e-house fnd. detail foundation detail ® foundation detail spread footing detail ��}�alr section detail ec-i t •i4".-o CIC#LE - _-_ a-:-d ..c... Vb".1'-0' eexe .u., 1'..d spread �i4•.1�-—o © '�++� - - '•/1 -- - _ 84'1-01 • ziit--- 1 yx f-ii,> 41-4n , q1-Z'-f 4'4" —_ Zo0".."6 �_.�I-0. /gi ti 3'."1•/ Icy-d f- /J Fu a k-wrveF g e V '4'h 1-4,11-12o.n'l1. 1-'2-Mw nE r cak 47 Z 1 - ' q�lyn-a117 FaF-� 1 _—I • e PIJ¢rl �." O , { _ l� V J k 2aPa a Crawlspace Yf 1- I'i v( W 10' 4�+111.GF,"4_N-.r P ur acD _ N 4 N �E '.d1 G Y11L.yr H`iAe� O (el e1RD Cr 6 �/X�' P. I I u I gradeguy • 1 V/ 11 x ax I ~ j ' W V �yWO oB ,� wlcrs J 79-P 0 slab on 4 „z 4-4A ' s-q - 4' -3'- _ AN O4"6,tsre a'�pr,oE w/ /21 - -�. 4;,MIL v re>t- 1 i .`d V 1, P' 1,71)4)• of _. P hLDPe ""foPpal-1-r I ,\_%.,*.- '' "` P °G ' ' � � w II► (� Imi [_ pr/ wxbcDp0/Ti_Dc:,�' ©I --t� ' I,__)- I W p / PT2.9 vJb 4 � ' 'yitd, IG."at. X aQ© n v ' �i s L —J .�F] © 2r lit v i N \O rN" w Ai ,� ® z �' // o k/ T 'n ZI I .. I vhTMa i.oee,6n �'• d ( / �� a illh ,•X /.. AUTR[cAxG PETw[e4 'B."c i�! � -"'-st=e" 4 " �� © // s•'J. •Iii,i6 IMil i 4 3 -f 414x Lo" �I G1-4x L.___.. 51D�C+fRR s%4'16U/cr,%o O0 ''a�... •• // J�I�'• _ L,fn ,vv.,,,,,,,,. vv.,,,,14*-i. © V •F 14•,,,r VE41Tt© NP.wo n.TVP 2�012'�1uG 2•b LO71[JGMA Tat-r 1OH9 P • '.i.o44. ', II.✓rVEF'C'F,�� �782- 1/q T.b ftt.0D , ' a OL SA D."'. II 11 6RIcu ,,,,,, ./ _ �..1j11 `�',{'-/p$ 111•/� C 1510 4Xi=27.Y�i' TT�'C E(Bl q[ob �f dH1r. MA'S. A HIr112'I �/ _ • YiYA'L. 2 0 " to Pa. " 71�� • KT6s ('�'{Q,1 �¢ 6)2+vi PPLafd+ Iv o:LiuDe - RATE-Po.eo Pciif I 11 !1 I 11 x1....2.24 I 1 I I g1�1 I,1 13''6'I R-N POSY wNa rBRTH Hr•O'ai. 6, `7-Ox SA 4'•y /'S-bx c-s-7 / ' _,/ o N /,, / a'-G IWiNLATIOIJ T�10i. ' PCT WALa 9c..o/DTI.. t t �•- / / �- / f x / I I �l.. ( '{�" 11 / " 1 26 0" / a o / liorol / 34b PETE ISSUED �� 2.re wren Dcab I `h" A CHO " q a,>C(xT /B"a A.B. ".v„,. O.T •RAT, u-rI1+slobs A Na"Pf.M eHbS �>a"'- /n"•d 4+1E..-', Boars a , " E�4-O Q 3''Vi9't q"9uu [ -a4*AN coUTMuOUi U I z`.2" 3/ra" wnancA u.a ©>/y!A.6 a 16"o l[o�x No. 1T {Ep 4 xfR GSti Oc+[Ff • Y.�Pr rLHC W/ I4I/O`.J`)' -oe erax+o. -r r FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES footing schedule Ps)*a DAP.,Oarr - 1 %,,o Ae'a _pP gip.o MIGLCVW>t P x T[zP rear..... • _ r�9J FbH Wi4S1•g • ALL BEAMS TO BEq.IOELF.Y],U.N.O. b'O PO•,T ON'Jd4;"rs= 0ma..OE 1 T,.zcc a _ _ Ss1.-L 1,-�tp 4.4 N•Jf ON ID'O.Dyr4K LONG Rbvg1+4 DPRb eW Aa` >EE PRTwza O - b MIL VD LAP 6x SOLID BLOCKING OVER SUPPORTS / cON14 PTe- -.4 AAA*eW- '•�/P. > P..,y u II • • 1 • ALL FOOTINGS TO REST ON UNDISTURBED SOIL 0 e V o >r[: rm T zu,. -_- - t • • -- C ALL VI000 IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED Po.T RJ�.m I�1NR z C 4'/rF4 Pi"MHJ- 1 0 g:4,7 PT (y...-• '1-K4 M[5 cOJT . SLAB ON GRADE: e CONC.SLAB W/6:6 W1A x VeL4 WW.F.ON 0*Lq,IGPTb.I2-R4DORh Ew ("b,�'4'�,e,,, P•�y�waa > e[Tw:a O bMIH _..... x MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON["GRANULAR FILL GON(•-R.•w1144 e..LW. TP aR FmTz.x.. foundation detail oundation plan °P[`v=b"= 14",1,d a Done wall detail x a fl w1.e 6/4",''d - x.,bc.. .ea_o.,.., rXs4.e ,v, ,1•11.1, . - . . . 11 niiii ,11$14-11,.1 1 t1111111111; , t l'iiiihs ll's rt1,5§141il = ! - nu „i , _ • w i Ty ,...) z . UJ Cal r (.0 ,....., ct south elevation < D I-- Tie, . Ct t'"-----'--- — -. - !I _I __..„..„... .., I . .c: — )110 11 .. . 1 / r . .MEi . .MI - 1 • - .. 11 i"7:7' 11 i( 1 . ' -7-' . • $ I 1. .0,<z... e •I-I1. _./ 1: r t • 1 . . *0111 TU*5+ Xnorth elevation v4.--ii-d • 7 , , . t illiiiillil illilibi4 111111 ill 11'ill !IiIItM III'III ! E ..,...„,,,,t,.&,,41.f., ,1 Inntilli II ..r,,r,,,,F ode_r_till 1 Z W 0 (n W cr east elevation ,4;1 0 Q z I- 1�=° Cr fyP Ig iF+.Kos e c a. \ m� .... .. .. t ::rterbaP' J_ - �JL ter ar_ ,e r1 p. � i. • 11- .f ra"+ rC�r L; hall • tchen I ILifihlill �� �IIIIuI, Er tG-I1 Ir19L. Ae r-1.t I6Mao. A Arig".4- j �. T F T i p 0.5. e 1 11 NEM .TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION •TYPICAAIL/W{ALL CONSTRUCTION/I) - FLOOR CONSTRUCTION O4OD 1010' W�o+EVEL;1.111 GOAR d 3.23'19 cOSIPDOIION TILES ECG YNCR VENEER • FBWSU FLOOR COVERING IMI FELT 140 FELT • w"TONGUES/MOM!PLYWOOD lie`O 1/r PLYWOOD SHEATHING Mr CDS PLYWOOD SHEATHING • Sae JOISTS O MAIN FLOG. - 'M S+ TRUSSES OR Sa RAFTERS(I)Or O.C. WO STUDS 01S"O.C.I Sao a GARAGE WALLS I W 1S JOISTS 9 UPPER FLOOR ]O INSULATION RAS SOIAATSSN • R-111 INSULATION I OVER UNHEATED SPACE I W.GYPSUM WALLBOARD MT GVPNIII WALLBOARD • GYPSUM WALLBOARD (VIRN BELOW buildin section - A west elevation V4"I:11_d X y4E=1'-dl • "... r ',_ .„.,A4-,,------,. ''' . .'3;117 7_Si .'.g-,,,,,g -c 4,:_,-..„-.4;.1,., !„pi. ke,,' : A pa,:3„@. 12 ,7a--3, 455 w w2 29-24-5 8 E 1/2 3,-24-5 RENTON Il . .,,,,,,,,„_.,. :. iiri 1 — al,crE ,',, ,.. -A--1P-:-- N:-' A.G..T„ 9667 -- 1 4 ssm ST ‘,1 At. .., -5r, "',.,. ,y& ,„..1.4 ,....' ' !1.,'.16 f"••"rr,W t'' * Gov't.Lot e a i , !_ IRP!ILid4.0 th;r4ii., ,k-.1,Te To-.--Tu .. ,i- ,,, , , m io6g_ 10 15 Ac• NENNT0ALE I 4 N. 36TH, ST 0 t • • e-"i. g" 4 7 , I ' ,'t''i 14C a . ri',,44V r 68 /\ 1,'•' t: e a sN I" ' 4 ' :tA§ 4' !14.: 1.' '*111• .1fr IP P S! ;= 4, 731:!:64' ''. ••,.' • ' •••, •••• •ha;I I%J..'_:_.11• 5,:„;sprt.177.....„,..,,,,,4.4. 70 ,. 4., •,,„...„,..,,, n ..., '- i: ,P ._' L., Elptup. 1 J‘rimii.,2•01 .'••4Pi.,•''',• ' -:-... .,•• •Esi•• ' Er )- III \ _ .1$1.L r'i•:: -. . i - 66 , tZ443,;±-- te LANIN11, ,?:41.lie'ltd.,lilt.1 _ii; !'TA ,Ncr-Prt.12341.1.-, ..,,,- sT}:0,..]40:IP j.p!.,.Cf.A.(i),, ,44_:_ G) . 11 -4.191`.45- -9- ',1•-• ,....47 NAIllpf- 'AENT !5:H..,l'e.4..0.,..40..,ta,t4ITA'_•„'._T4,,%9,:-14',- ! r, 1..,-.T.A,I t • if4et 4,--',--":'='-_-,-i_l_'•_:-:' fliiI6p 1• .....- 'i ,.,,,0.0..= . il .zLt1.,t- .:°._Iligs.r.,:.- .(14 ,Lt IN.--4,,,v,. 91..11,.10„1.ii.).1,. , $ .,_.. .:•I:er`, '5 f., • . • .1, .15,-.,P9-50__H - . '4,, - ,I,.„ „, ---,-, , Ffig z," '...1-1 •':---,ft-,r- ,, i 4-i-:• /,15. ;15111115r I 4.115 Ot 'eiozer'In 1'.-167 01' I i$ ie, zi..- 5--th'•,.14111 l' ' I '1.1. IA/ — . AINCI 9 A. - • ' ' N 33RD ST -Pp _t 1.;34 i ,e,...1,.7 4 (8 Kkigqi5r, 0-5 '2' '' "r:I'" - 1. q - H' LigAtrWrillAlati %,--ta S,614.GiON 5 NI.4 ,,, 1121 9. 1/,94V.1,,, 'Ai1/2,1117r,rap.7 rilli - .•,i,,.• .,.., . - P•i,„=-1.,:Q = N 32N0' ' ST,. +. fr:' —'t ' S."-R•''' *L.L— •°'','-44 F P.,',7f.;^7.7V-',..T." ,. IrTrt 1"" . 4::tr ''' 4 il '.' - '4 sibluEr$4,16' ,0 4 litmqittl--1,u, ‘‘.„, 1 '' ' ''I" ' N'. '32ND .' 6T- ' ,, ' 14? LSI • ee.,`,,,%, -...... . 2 -_,:„..1,' ij Pt3M) ,..„St' • •1 leiervar.k ith,.. ozQl.aatd ratt.1 E4, t)I i0d.S1 N iii,. ,35,),.. \ 41( /0 . Pt 31ST St -ifflimirm,, ..lio, ., , }:IFITquiii.1 6- 38, r:v I 24 N 3IST ST • 1 ;z, ,-4 , ,4 .' cloqqi-jgg:40iiiii eicii,610.'0', "...1",it;.19 ct:117.,,1,34;: ,i, .1. ..?9,._ ,, .. N. 30TH , ST 1 a !fa ' -,, WV", ,.. N. 30701 ST2 !' ,, ,.. . .,.,.._.„„, .. .., 1,,,,,.. , ., i i is,iv: Iril t i ',I.:, .....,11%. .T.TEEI____?..--- •..-,:.-- 0 ..' - , ) ..104555- - ,..0.-..„, , N 29TH ST. .,. ;4c, -11 5; / `,'• 1- 9, z,•,.. ' ,,,,„ 'N.,-.,-.7.0/54,',„ IRE mire...,7 1 0 0 , .... ' ' . I• V I I' ,,0. -v—i. — a" :1*44',,,re-7i' s wr.•,,, I i Irii'6i;:it:t 06'i[1)11""lia:lk I.' VC *:" i-'.•-i.---1----,;,;1[6.t- " -- 1 .• , „ 0.---.. °4;;;, . .' " 28.1" •it- f". : i 46 ii,ilithit zdc,-'44.i ,-, . ------ 50 .11'..°!* '•%:" ' ' -''' 7 i= 1.)-iiL.IATI.,];`Pliikl_. ag.q•J%t_.4%,,L-N.it.-.-ibrii-116:' • •-• ''• '.;,. +E'.-2""-/`"sr \ '-' ' '''*';',,,r .0; —`71 — '7'bmi- '' I. -'''" "'i.1"."--41q 4"41 . ''''..g ([11 r •111....ci,',12•L, <", - "'-‘e ' l*,iit\, v•-•°;f,•!•• mn,„'“ :m''''''f:°,51---4• ,_'-iii '''',4;,.''' ‘.,-,"•':-•-•i,i,T I -_-_- .. , <,s , * ,t,...:-.,,. -., • •:,,.. ,, ,..,,„., vs„ .1 : ei 1 \ 61/2' .% .7( c.0 \ ''""'"" ‘,,,\' "4"""Z"''"'—tlotti'.1',.,;1'f.. //: i I :. ' 41--- 411r s 'Pl• .0... --1.-- 04, S?.,, c-,,,, . •,:, m,,t,./ LLA:.„.„-„-„_„.• —, ,„,,,,. z,,,,,,,,,.., , ,, ,,,,,,÷3E 5-5>>.\'s Itr- ',, " s g.'4,.c.15.,.. . ' ' ---: .•7..r,-,.,:ik"tg 'A '„',- r •*. '',., ' s',',* ,,'" \:'. .,. ,,- Cztt;r1P%.>--- ? t _. V' - -7,. i.,;,,,. --, gie ;;,- ,,.',.:f- - t,9-4w-4 : •-4.. z ----------t' <,.. ---5- ...- i . 0 ., - ..11.";,!„'".,,\ -:.•,,- "ar,.,2.9... qg 1 .4 i; 746 -if_ 1 . ''.i. •,,, (;s,....A y,, , ..' '..1.::.'"„ . - ca.. ' • Os :T.,1:. '. 2, : .. ,0 . '' 171 '•i„...0. ‘ 't ,T.,•,-...:..ie.--- , ... . -,:.= .a4.0.,., ---- - rt, • , 2... •., :•.. 6.4:14 2 4--- :. m "Ar., 0 -1 ''..\ , 12:014crts '. 4.,- I i I" 'l'Et . b‘•A ?. •----:--'." •— ., 0 ,ii,.-1,, . ;,, .-. : 1:: . ---.3-- '4,, k..'...0' 'Jf,,, ) •'. !,..n. "•' r- • ' 'i.,-* \\.•'-' -.. - , ;;"''' 1.'(:11 31,Tj '' It;] 331 4 . 0 1 ' 4-\• 3•';, • 1- E "1;It lii,,' . • r c g. 7,13 i • '''',14 'fD ---. ' 1 . • \ . '.,.,.',' . N, \ ' ,: ','.. 4 i . . 14 • .,,,, _ - -1 D. \ IP . 0 i"f,„ .,),..:‘,,,, 0 i. , . '', T. .. i R 111,21...10 Dock VAI1.1221LE TICOSEL7 , rn \- \ I • -1, '. „: 701 N 3Ors, SsOrsd WA c° e <1 L•u. 1.12a ••KO.-SILILLIL ra...Ra....,k, 4-e• \ 340 3%3 _ ___ ._,..,----'..,.__ * S 1"j-•-774."' KROLL MAPCOMPANY c ,. „.. --.----- .14, i , .. .lit .1 , ' ' -,..-4„,0- -- II - .. .... IM4kt ,.��' t '+�*' J. 1 `i^. b.% Y ,1 sa ♦ ' _! - ,xF+,fit• S'� t �� T £ F �, � r , �y art 1 GENERAL NOTES t gat �S 1 lr GENERAL NOTES ' a . } LIVE LOADS TIMBER h i °ue .I/'PS! r,"AnoN OI. bMi:'X'EiTnT..... rorsv r t.lAn'[..,I..n.ea.I.�.mw.N..I..w.n.u+maln a.m.n w.b wrw.JW _ .� „` O TI! 1117+FI1 A'I� "ib. ,c F. r��ti.. owl dr.o.ud.v�,n. ° '�' � i11i CLU LAMINATED WOOD MEMBERS :y- -<7.. 4- • f11°11 p i a [ I: , ia . c _ CONCRETE PLYWOOD w+E,ux LE nn440,11,a ROSE w m eu"..xDTI,. .-----1------- Z .� ,d . �MNt MIq."r._e:rec EVAN"2I*ld..vul Nailing '9 bpo B .., ,.. w TRUSSES r- �/ 't. REINFORCING STEEL ,,,,..,. .ad ��TM•la. ,m. •�nw.a..,^.,,o r�{.K. . eland to ;, I.N s,,,� gib•''.e D 1111 �. i �� --cd^. ,,,z% ,.,,...... ,A k... [ .gin � ;,� �\ .( I V i ".r .mMt.a. FRAMING u,. 1 IO1V -1�_ `_- 'i�[ - • t mood.. t.....r.a v.�.m s^a dum• 9c'• ,.".""". V",caw"4;; u"'"-2'2".""-'' �� • '4, STRUCTURAL STEEL // cog- 061 0• W 11.11,e C..AseMA."I rea or•x",N ESEZ All„atmembers 0011 Isev Kn one.....,a,....a r.l.,\Wall....,I...s„,W.... DOORS AND WINDOWS MISCELLANEOUS STEEL ." � '- _-.—_.._'tl�' Q i . M, I I:".a,t .a a•'n. .� .., ':tii.i.`M",I r...ru.,.,W,_o.a.lk. I m.. - _ slotenri4'tr6LE��/ ' p A.A..boll.Into mnorme m[r ...,.I.., q n..dm Ntr..d M..me Wu . s.,M.'2^�.4 Idi i�- Y/ .ij It AASONRY r �.... . ehi,.endEases �ox.r.ar..nal iWa N,...n-.i.,.n... , //Wy/ /'� type 110- Asr,t:m ri I," .Irm+IA.ion.rn,e.Wl M1o.. ._— 14- C mad inixwdmuwlA DEG?Sonar.I 5`Idl�„-IMxl rst.i rBJmlc .nAIT.AW cluine�n m.n�bne {1 -- y^� wreaT"",i.at.7or dzotrxi s;` .n.nt.<"nn.alt...amm�n�n2 nnim M.,.�.,n..n t 1 �I - , INSULATION - I _ FIREPLACES . ,. Ise.Insole.i.4.,a Ocallon N.Waist* r ' .::� IC, ._ 0 .,1 a N!A..aa ... wA ls"E,„"eNNo".eAN UFO e+�q FLOORS 0V2"UNHEATEDV..F gff. RIO DUCTS IN UNRESTED SPACES R b RS LUMBER STRENGTH{units N PSI/ GAASS W n:"WATER ea } ' � ..slmAe s,.d.d �Q Fv F7. E MISCELLANEOUS NOTES 1\' — 19 Cr ^ STUD, 4WD OREM �" .� ' 1 G 11414.' • ',;I I so :Iz•r) A Iwf tmw j HEADERS. GIRDERS �L.Nominal Du. 0 roe,s x.un .. ,T I^!O 1A0.00" d .r . . , .,. „I "4d oFnat1 .n.,al",w GLUED.LALEINME1 IMBERS 4 1. \8 F oI�ai�o� y1"ol 1. r site plan legal description ? °° S, Y-6,C.Gt NILL4-W15 41op7F1 --r'''4. li. e oi-1 IN 4 fl,'G'1Q.1 'j mil o FIB. _s:,> • rp ,"i,IGirl i4�W iiJe ?'I,d:. • r • W k kiiii 'A .fat. i p I - ,\ _}` tf.- r ,_y..Iy,t .. .., f �a.,,r.� P Y.T.:"...fi"i ._�• J+ vs • — rr>J "blkaY77 a \+l«,JliiMl[ .r-'_.. r ,''� -...... a".,. wl. '7!E[��K. ',.rtx.,+.f Y� _ .4J1� --Il • I< l,j - 95r `iq - I I t , v- Ft OMA LEE BERGERON NORTHRN SANTA FE BURLINGTON JOHN& SUE BURROUGHS 808 N 29Th St 1700 E Golf Rd#400 2815 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Renton, WA 98056 M MONICA FIX LARRY&CYNDA FRISVOLD MARTIN GALSTER&Peggi Dubois 3007 Mountain View Ave N 707 N 29Th St 2907 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 MARTIN GALSTER&Peggi Dubois ERMA GUNTLE NABIL&GHADA HAMADEH 2907 Mountain View Ave N 814 N 30Th St 2908 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ROBERT KINGEN EMILY KJOBECH D LARSON 3014 Lake Washington Blvd N 807 N 30Th St 718 N 30Th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 R C B MARSHALL STEVEN&MARCIE MAXWELL GARY MCCLELLAND 2909 Mountain View Ave N PO Box 2048 806 N 29Th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 AGNES MERRELL BRIAN MILLER SYLVIA MORRISON 3004 Lake Washington Blvd N 806 N 30Th St 1401 N 34Th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 MICHAEL MURRAY TERRY LYNN GUARDIAN NATION NOT AVAILABLE FROM COUNTY 801 N 31St St 2807 Mountain View Ave N 7625 111Th P1 SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Newcastle, WA 98056 ERIC&KIMBERLY PETERSON HELEN PFEIFLE RANDY&LINDA RITUAL() 1007 N 36Th St 812 N 30Th St 14926 165Th P1 SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 MELISSA ROBERTS MARY RYNNING ALEX SANCHEZ&Melania Duarte-San 805N31StSt 819N30ThSt 703N29ThSt Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056. DONALD SAVOY SHANE AGNES E;SHANE FAMILY LIMI SCOTT SPENGLER&Marsha Bain-Spen 3015 Mountain View Ave N 2519 6Th Ave 2902 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98121 Renton, WA 98056 CHRISTINA SPROUT DANIEL&TRACY STETLER T-PAN INC 7625 111Th Pl SE 707 N 31St St 1201 N 33Rd St Newcastle, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 PAULINE TOMICH ROBERT&CAROLYN TRAUTMANN GLENN&ANN WALLACE JR. 3008 Lake Washington Blvd N 809 N 29Th St 813 N 29Th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 THOMAS WIELGOS LINDA WONG-GARL ANDREW&MARK ZILMER 2811 Mountain View Ave N 816 N 29Th St Rosemary Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 815 N 30Th St Renton,WA 98056 mritimmxiiirmar- Insionr-- -ww wolummomplimpip a p CITY OF RENTON o � .":y--� , ,,,�_�a * Planning/Building/Public Works g _% 7. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co N AUG 18'9 9 ir : z ® 3 0 S PB 120 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED MITER U.S. POSTAGE -. • MELISSA ROBERTS 805 N 31 St St Renton, WA 98056 i0T DELI VERABLE _._____ �`� AS ADDRESSED ��ro iz UNABLE TOSENDFORWARD rn , __ _ RETURN TO SENDER co a�AUTO d"' +i1!'8 51. ---- l,l,I„l,l,,,(l,,,(,i„11,,,1,(,t,l„ICI,! 31�1 it�1;,1'.�7',tl; ,,f�l',,1.1:.',fi,� -- -.......--.......! 7w+\ . .N.- V ............. % p CITY OF RENTON �: ,, -...�►� . Planning/Building/Public Works W I AottOff"'' f. S3 - — � ,,.1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 �, AU6 18 9 9 �.•� Q : r .. ' Z t * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED i� j pa26p U.S. POSTAGE • GUp,RDIAN NATION TERRY LYNN View Ave N 2S0�Iviounta�98056 Renton,W t% OteELIIERAOLE U AS ADDRESSED Dire' O` UNABLE TO FORWARD rn _ _ RETURN TO SENDER a lid .47, •*+ttl�3-b..._:. :� 11,1„1„1,11,„,hA„IJ„,IL„1J„11,„1,1,1,1„1,1,„11,1 November 1, 1999 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPELLANTS: Randy and Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD LOCATION: 701 N 30th Street SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Appeals denial of variance for maximum permitted lot coverage PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Appellants'written request for a hearing and examining the available information on file,the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 12, 1999 hearing. The official record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 12, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the appeal, Exhibit No.2: Land use file LUA91-111,V-A(by proof of posting and publication,and other reference) documentation pertinent to the appeal. Exhibit No.3: Vicinity map Exhibit No.4: Photographs(4) Exhibit No. 5: Site plan of adjacent property Parties present: Randy and Linda Ritualo,Appellants 14926 165th Place SE Renton,WA 98059 Representing City of Renton Larry Warren,City Attorney Leslie Nishihira,Assistant Planner 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Randy&Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 2 The Examiner explained that the appeal was an administrative appeal held pursuant to Ordinance 3071 and was the only administrative review to occur on the matter. The matter may be submitted back to the Examiner for reconsideration if the parties are not satisfied with the decision. He stated that the appellant had the burden of demonstrating that the City's action was erroneous,and would have to show clear and convincing evidence that the City's determination was incorrect. At that point the City could respond, if they chose to do so. Mr.Ritualo, appellant herein, stated that the issue was whether they should be allowed to exceed the 35 percent lot coverage in building their house. A building permit was issued based on plans submitted,which represented 34.9 percent lot coverage. The request for variance was to build a larger deck than was included in the original permits,that would increase the size of the existing deck from 223 square fee to 530 square feet. The larger deck would increase the lot coverage from 34.9 percent to 38.9 percent, a 3.9 percent increase over the maximum lot coverage allowed by the statute. There are four conditions which appellant must meet in order to receive a variance, and Mr. Ritualo reviewed the City's position and his arguments against those positions. The first criteria included undue hardship based on the subject property including size, shape,topography and location. The property in question is a 7,550 square foot corner lot bordered by three streets and one residential lot. The adjacent house and the subject one are at the maximum lot setbacks. Mr. Ritualo stated that this property did not allow them to build what they would like and thus created an undue hardship. At the time of application for a building permit,the original size of the deck exceeded the lot coverage maximum. The appellants decided to reduce the size of the deck to obtain a building permit and proceeded with building the house. The City was notified that a variance would be requested to obtain the larger deck size. In the second criteria,the City acknowledges that the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare,but contends that increasing lot coverage by 3.9 percent would be injurious to the surrounding property improvements because it allows construction that differs from standards. The appellants believe their house will be an improvement visually and environmentally,as well as to the public safety. Allowing an increase in the deck of 307 square feet does not allow construction that differs from other standards in the area. The appellant submitted a site plan of an adjacent house which exceeded the lot coverage maximum, setting a precedent for the area. Regarding the third criteria of granting of a special privilege,appellant responded that a deck 3.9 percent over the maximum lot coverage is not excessive, and that if one citizen is allowed to exceed 35 percent lot coverage in the vicinity,then consideration has to be given to them. As to the minimum variance criteria,the appellant does not have the opportunity for a lot line adjustment. Regarding the City's suggestion that appellant modify or redesign the house,appellants took a calculated risk to seek a variance and also did not want to go through the permit process again. In conclusion,appellant stated that the granting of this variance would allow them a larger deck with an exit, it would not be an impervious surface, and no damage would be done to the site or to the neighbor's property, Ms.Nishihira,testifying on behalf of the City and regarding the adjacent property,stated that staff had checked its records. The only thing on record was an approved building permit,but no variance application was submitted. She further stated that the maximum lot coverage provision had been a part of the R-8 zone development standards for quite some time. Randy& Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 3 Floyd Hewitt, 23644 SE 137th Street,Issaquah, Washington 98027, appellant's contractor,reiterated that the site was bordered on three sides by streets which is quite unusual. Because of the long narrow lot,the setbacks further limited the project. The proposed extension to the deck was not excessive,but only made it more useable. He further responded to the fact that no negative comments had been received by neighbors to this project. In closing argument,Mr. Warren stated that this was a sizeable house that had been put on a small lot, and that necessarily brings certain limitations with it. The first criteria had not been met as the appellant suffered a hardship because of the size of the structure. They chose to keep the size of the house which was over the City's lot coverage requirement, and thus created their own hardship. He also responded regarding the minimum variance, and stated that there had been no testimony that this was the minimum variance that is necessary. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this appeal. There was no one else wishing to speak. The hearing closed at 10:50 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. Randy and Linda Ritualo, hereinafter appellants,filed an appeal of an administrative determination denying an Administrative Variance(File LUA-99-111). 2. The appellant owns a single family home at 701 North 30th Street in the City of Renton. The home is located in the Kennydale neighborhood. The home is located on the southeast corner of North 30th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard North. An alley is located along the east boundary of subject site. 3. The parcel is a trapezoid where Lake Washington Boulevard runs at a slight northwest angle in front of the site. The parcel is 54.01 feet wide(east to west)which is also the dimension of the east or alley property line. The 30th Street frontage is 146.50 feet. The Lake Washington Blvd.frontage is 55.42 feet. The south property line is 133.09 feet. 4. The parcel is 7,550 square feet in area. 5. The appellants are constructing a new home on the subject site. The existing plans were approved by the City and meet code requirements. 6. The existing plans would erect a home with a footprint or lot coverage of 2,632 square feet. This plan results in a lot coverage of 35 percent of the 7,550 square foot lot. 7. The applicant proposes modifying the plans to add a deck, or actually enlarge the deck that is proposed in the current plans. The addition would add 306 square feet to the building's gross square feet. This Randy&Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 4 would increase the gross square footage to 2,938 square feet. This would increase the lot coverage to 38.9 percent. 8. The subject site is in the R-8 (Single Family; Lot size-4,500 square feet)Zone. This zone limits lot coverage to 35 percent for lots over 5,000 square feet in area. The home without this proposed new addition just meets this limitation. 9. The background for this proposal shows that the appellants originally proposed the larger home and deck. When review showed it did not meet the regulations and would require a variance,the appellants reduced the home to meet code to move ahead with their plans. 10. The building with or without the addition meets the Zoning regulations in all other particulars except the lot coverage limitation. It would meet front,rear and sideyard setbacks as well as the height limitations of the R-8 zone. 11. The appellants claim the addition would make better use of the site,be economically justified and create a better appearance. Apparently some neighbors in the vicinity did not object to the proposal. 12. The appellants also claim the adjacent home to the south exceeds the lot area standards. There is no record of when the home was erected and if it was modified and whether it may have met earlier standards. They noted other larger decks in the area but only referenced their size, not that they are part of conforming structures. 13. The appellants allege that the subject site is constrained by the two roadways,Lake Washington Blvd and 30th Street,and the alley. They claim this diminishes the utility of the parcel. It was pointed out by staff that the development meets the setbacks from the two streets and the alley and that lot coverage is a separate criterion. 14. The appellant pointed out other properties in the vicinity of the subject site which have garages or other structures that appear to be located in the front yard setback. 15. The appellants applied for the variance for the larger deck. It was subject to administrative review. The variance was denied and the appellant filed a timely appeal. 16. Staff noted limiting the lot area coverage is intended for aesthetic reasons and to provide certainty for the neighbors and the community. 19. Staff further noted that even if some homes in the area violate the required provisions,that should not justify voiding the limitations and creating an unhealthy precedent. 20. Finally,the City noted that there is no standard to judge whether this would be the minimum variance needed to provide relief. Why is the additional coverage the appellants requested needed in this case? Why not slightly more or slightly less coverage? Why does the deck have to be 12 feet wide and not 8 feet or 10 feet? Randy& Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 5 Why not slightly more or slightly less coverage? Why does the deck have to be 12 feet wide and not 8 feet or 10 feet? CONCLUSIONS: 1. The appellants have the burden of demonstrating that the decision of the Zoning Administrator was either in error,or was otherwise contrary to law or constitutional provisions, or was arbitrary and capricious(Section 4-3011(B)(1)(b). The appellants have failed to demonstrate that the action of the Administrator should be modified or reversed. The decision of the Administrator is affirmed. 2. Arbitrary and capricious action has been defined as willful and unreasoning action in disregard of the facts and circumstances. A decision,when exercised honestly and upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances, is not arbitrary or capricious(Northern Pacific Transport Co. v Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, 69 Wn. 2d 472,478 (1966). 3. An action is likewise clearly erroneous when,although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing body,on the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. (Ancheta v Daly, 77 Wn. 2d 255,259 (1969). 4. The appellants have failed to demonstrate that the decision was founded upon anything but a fair review of the variance criteria as they pertain to the proposed alteration. The appellants have failed to demonstrate with cogent evidence that a mistake was made. 5. The major problem in this case is that the appellants have completely and very recently created and designed their own hardship. They originally submitted plans for a larger home with the larger deck now proposed. It was withdrawn after it was found not to meet code. The appellants went ahead with a design that filled out the entire 35 percent lot coverage. The home is being constructed at this very time. Now the appellants are claiming a hardship. The only hardship is not being able to erect a home they want. That has nothing to do with code limitations. The hardship is not created by the application of the code provisions. The original plans could have been altered to pull back a room or facade element and allow a larger deck, and therefore a footprint that met the code limitation. 6. As the Zoning Administrator noted, "the lot coverage provision is intended to provide for a consistent residential aesthetic by limiting the percentage of a site that can be covered with connected or stand- alone structures." 7. Even if the adjacent home does not comply with the standard,this does not necessarily justify approval of this variance. If this variance were to be approved without any justification and actually in light of the design decisions the appellants only recently made,the lot coverage provision would become meaningless. No resident in the R-8 zone could be assured that large homes with excessive lot coverage would not crop up next door or across the street. Since there is no real hardship, approval of the appellants'request would eliminate any real standards and all similar requests would have to be approved or others would claim the appellants received unjust consideration. 8. The juxtaposition of the various streets and alleys also do not create any hardship. Those facade features that might be affected by street setbacks are not affected by the proximity or number of streets. Randy&Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 6 The home meets the setbacks. Front, rear and sideyard setbacks are separate and apart from lot area coverage. 9. The City also noted that there is no standard available in this case to judge whether the requested variance is the minimum necessary for relief. Since a reasonable home can be constructed without the variance,there does not seem to be any way to determine what more would be needed to make this home and site use reasonable. If the appellants believed that the current home would not provide a reasonable residence,they could have altered the plans before proceeding. While there does not appear to be any legal hardship that justifies a variance, any hardship perceived by the appellants was self- inflicted. 10. While it appears that another property may have excessive coverage,there is nothing in the record to demonstrate whether this was sanctioned by other standards or if they were done without proper approval. It does not justify approval of the variance requested for this property. For a variance to be granted the specific conditions of the subject site are at issue and the site does not appear to suffer any conditions warranting variance relief. 11. As noted by the City in other variance reviews: "It may also be considered injurious to property improvements in the vicinity and zone because it would allow for construction that differs from the standards that generally apply to all property in the R-8 Zone. This would set a precedent and create uncertainty about maintaining zoning standards which have been adopted to protect and enhance residential neighborhoods." 12. Since the burden of demonstrating error is on the appellant,this office can only reach the conclusion that the Administrator made the correct determination. The decision below must be affirmed. 13. The City should investigate the other properties to determine whether the intrusions noted by the appellant are appropriate. Inappropriate or illegal alterations generate animosity since citizens such as the appellant and others are not legally permitted the variance while those who violate the rules seem to benefit improperly. DECISION: The appeal is denied. ORDERED THIS 1st day of November, 1999. FRED J. KAUF HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of November, 1999 to the parties of record: Randy&Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 7 Randy&Linda Ritualo Larry Warren Leslie Nishihira 14926 165th Pl SE 1055 S Grady Way 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Floyd Hewitt Emily Kjobach Susan Miller 23644 SE 137th Street 807 N 30th 806 North 30th Issaquah, WA 98027 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of November, 1999 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, PlanBldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator Betty Nokes, Economic Development Director South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,November 15, 1999. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending Iand use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. Randy&Linda Ritualo Administrative Appeal re Denial of Variance File No.: LUA99-133,AAD November 1, 1999 Page 8 The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 12, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: RITUALO VARIANCE AAD-99-133 The appellant, Mr. & Mrs. Ritualo, appeal the denial of a variance by the City of Renton for the Ritualo Variance project (file no. LUA-99-111,V-A). The Ritualo's had proposed a variance from the maximum permitted lot coverage in the R-8 zone. Location: 701 North 30th St. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Publication Date: October 1, 1999 Account No. 51067 aadpublication CITY * . F RENTON jf mIL • Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman i7EVELOPM:iiT FLANNIi:� September 27, 1999 CITY OF RENTON SEP c 1999 RECEIVED Mr. and Mrs. Randy Ritualo 14926 165th Place SE Renton, WA 98059 Re: Appeal of Administrative Determination Variance Request,File No. LUA99-111,V-A Appeal File No. LUA-99-133,AAD Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ritualo: Your letter of appeal in the above matter has been received and a date and time for said hearing have now been established. The appeal hearing has been set for Tuesday,October 12, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, at 1055 S Grady Way in Renton. Should you be unable to attend, would you please appoint a representative to act on your behalf. We appreciate your cooperation, and if you have any questions,please contact my secretary. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Larry Warren, City Attorney Leslie Nishihira, Project Manager Karen Codiga, Development Services 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 L CITY OF RENTON xi:50,o.m, SEP 171599 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RANDY & LINDA RITUALO 14926 165TH PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98059 PHONE 425-271-2882 Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing of Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re : Appeal of Ritualo Variance Project, File # LUA-99-111, V-A Dear Mr. Kaufman: Randy & Linda Ritualo, hereby are filing an appeal of the City of Renton' s Zoning Administrator' s denial of the aforementioned variance request . Information submitted as fact with our initial request for a variance was not justification in the eyes of Zoning Administrator' s staff to allow the variance . We are citizens who are trying to build a house for the first time and do not work with jurisdictions such as the City of Renton Planning Department on a regular basis . We were unable to locate a professional to conduct the request for a variance process for us, because the job was "too small" . Therefore we are attempting to work with the City of Renton on our own. Our ignorance in the entire construction process is relying on people from whom we sought advice. We are extremely disappointed in the designer who prepared the plans for the home . Our engagement with the planner provided us with the assurance that the plans for the house he was designing for us would be sufficient to obtain a building permit . In our opinion, the designer did not take into consideration RMC section 4-2-110A that limits lot coverage by buildings to a maximum of 35% . This is not the only item overlooked by the designer. The designer also failed to review water flow requirements for our lot, which resulted in the City of Renton Fire Marshall to deny a building permit . This issue was finally resolved after substantial research discussions and negotiations . We also relied on information from the City' s planning department in understanding the variance process as well as preparing information for submission of the variance. When contacting the planning department about submitting a variance I was but in contact with Roy Publico. I was never able to talk directly to a planner or a person who would make a determination. Mr. Publico had difficulty answering my questions, and always would have to consult a planner. Mr. Publico gave me the impression that as a property owner I am entitled to enjoy the same rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners. I interpreted this to mean that if one property owner was able to build a home in an R-8 zone and exceed lot coverage by 35%, than I would also be allowed to do the same . Therefore, we submitted the variance . I considered this the critical element for my variance and did not elaborate on the undo hardship, other than comparing the other neighbors decks to the small deck my building permit allows . This again demonstrates our lack of knowledge of the building and variance process by relying on other people whom we felt knowledgeable for accurate information. The Zoning Administrator and or her staff mentions numerous times in the denial notice, as well as in a telephone conversation as recently as this morning, that "the applicants created their own hardship" . We take exception to this statement . First, we would not intentionally create a hardship for ourselves, as seems to be implied by the Zoning Administrator. Secondly, the hardship that the Zoning Administrator feels we created is somewhat different than we would have endured had we not taken the calculated approach to obtaining the building permit that we did. I will explain what we have been through to get to the point of the building permit process and the decisions that had to be made by us . We bought the property with a 900 square foot former drug house on it in March of 1997, at a cost of $170, 000 . We put $40, 000 down and obtained a variable rate mortgage with a starting interest rate of 9 . 5%, due to the fact that the property would not be owner occupied, and the value of the land exceeded the value of the house . The interest rate was scheduled to increase in May of 1999 to 10 . 5% We bought the property to demolish the existing home and construct a new one. Due to the width of the lot a "book shelf" plan was not available. Thus we had to start from scratch. The actual house design took us from May of 1997 until May of 1999 working with the designer who guaranteed us that his plans would get us a permit . Our goal was to be living in the house by December of 1998 . Financing for both construction and permanent financing was arranged in December of 1998, at a rate beginning at 6 . 785% . Plans were not ready and thus the project was continually delayed. Interest rates began creeping upward. In May of 1999, after receiving complaints from the neighbors, regarding the condition of the house, we applied for a demolition permit as well as a building permit . All proper surveys for demolition and removal of asbestos were performed. On June 5, 1999 demolition began and was completed within one week. On June 9, we were notified that the fire marshall required us to provide water lines and fire hydrants to the neighborhood, the planning department requested that we install a larger exhaust fans, and change the address to the property to obtain a building permit . We worked with the City of Renton to get better water service to the neighborhood and agreed to install a sprinkler system in the house to meet the fire marshall concerns . Larger exhaust fans were put into the plans, and we changed the address to the property. Our bank financing with a favorable rate had been locked in January of 1999 . The bank was kind enough to keep extending the rate of 7 . 12596 until June when we could not get the permit . Calls were made to obtain the permit . We were notified on July 7, 1999 that not all requested information had not been provided. There were supposedly two pages of Review comments but we only received one. Thus one month later we received a request for the lot coverage which had been provided to the city with our original plans, but was not to the City' s required scale of 1"=20 ' . We submitted a site plan of 1"=10 ' . By shrinking our drawing on a copy machine by 5096, the plan reviewer would have had his desired site plan. It was at this time that we as home owners became aware of the fact that our plans exceeded the required lot coverage of 350 . Thus we faced a decision on whether to halt the entire process, go back to the designer that had created problems for us in the first place to redesign the house, or start all over with a different designer and/or architect which would substantially delay the project . In making the decision we had the following to consider. First our construction financing could not be secured until a building permit was received. Without a building permit, how long would the bank guarantee us an interest rate of 7 . 125 o when interest rates for our type of a loan were now above 80 . The threat of the mortgage on the property had the risk of being called because it was a residential loan and there was no house on the property. Continue making payments on a 10 . 50 loan. Prolong the entire process and run the risk of loosing out on the real estate market in which to sell our current residence. Another factor to consider was our personal live style. I am a tax accountant with my own practice in Renton. I prepare annually in excess of 400 income tax returns . The majority my work is performed between January and April of each year. Delaying the beginning of the construction process beyond June pushes the occupancy of the new home into the early months of the year 2000 . Professionally, for an accountant who specializes in taxation, occupancy of a new home during the tax filing season creates unneeded stress at this time of the year. These are the factors we had to consider in making the decision we did in obtaining our building permit #CP99081 . The decision we made was to avoid a serious long term financial risk. Thus to avoid having to continue paying on a high interest loan and run the risk of the loan being called, to obtain a construction loan and permanent financing at a favorable rate of 7 . 125% when prevailing rates were above 8 . 0%, to avoid the loosing out on the "hot" real estate market, and to eliminate undue stress in the first four months of 2000, we made the calculated decision to obtain the building permit as soon as possible . To obtain the building permit we submitted revised plans that removed from the deck nine feet of width as well as stairs exiting the deck. This decision was made after discussing the matter in detail with our builder and with Jim Jacques who is a member of the City of Renton Advisory board. This board advises on land coverage and use issues . Both gentlemen gave us the impression that obtaining the permit and requesting a variance for the larger deck would be a well calculated approach. The information submitted here, justifies the decision we made to obtain the building permit . Had we not made this decision we would have encountered substantial long term financial hardship. It is for this reason that we disagree with Zoning Administrator' s opinion that we created our own hardship and that not having a 12 foot deck vs. a 3 foot deck does not create a hardship. The day the permit was received Jan Conklin and Roy Publico of the City of Renton were both notified that a variance would be requested by myself. I further requested that notations be made in our file that a variance would be filed. This notification was done to prevent City Employees from creating adverse opinions of our intentions . We entirely plan on complying with all rules and regulations . We are merely requesting that we are entitled to enjoy the same rights and privileges of the neighbor to the south of our property located at 2908 Lake Washington Blvd South. The house located at 2908 Lake Washington Blvd. South, exceeds the 35% lot coverage. The City states, " there are no records on file for this address (the City is not required to retain building permits for single family homes) , staff was unable to confirm the lost coverage that was approved for the site . " It may be true that the City does not maintain such records . That is precisely why I provided the City with a site plan of the property located at 2908 Lake Washington Blvd. If the City is not convinced by my analysis they should go out into the field and measure the property to see for themselves that the lot coverage on this property exceeds 35% . I think by ignoring our analysis of the adjacent property the City has committed an error. In obtaining the Fire Marshall permission to build, we also had to convince him that he should drive to the site to identify the proximity of all fire hydrants as oppose to the ones he was able to locate on a map. That field trip exposed an error by the fire marshall in his initial decision to deny our building permit . The issue is not the 3 ' deck vs . the 12 foot deck, or a comparison of the size of the decks in the neighborhood. The issue is the house located at 2908 Lake Washington Blvd. , exceeds 35% lot coverage. We hereby request that we be allowed to exceed the 35% lot coverage . As previously, stated in our variance request a deck is an impervious service and has absolutely no detrimental effects to our property or the surrounding properties, such as concrete does . In calculating the 35% lot coverage concrete driveways and walkways are not consider. To take full advantage of the views, our house was designed with an 11 ' crawl space. A crawl space as opposed to a basement was used to avoid unneeded living space. With such a high exposed crawl space the appearance of the exterior of the house did not and does not look very appealing. Thus the original larger deck design helped to improve the street appearance of the house. For this reason we feel that the larger deck to improve the overall appearance does add value to the house and to the property, contrary to the Zoning Administrators opinion. With such a high crawl space and high off of the ground deck the need for an access and entrance was deemed necessary. With the smaller deck no exit from the deck will exist . In the event of a fire that will represent an 11 to 12 feet leap to the ground. Furthermore, only two exists from the house will exits without risking injury by jumping from off the ground structures . The Zoning Administrator makes the following statement : "The lot coverage code provision is intended to provide for a consistent residential aesthetic by limiting the percentage of a site that can be covered with connected or stand alone structures . The restriction serves to eliminate the potential for "super structures" and encourages the construction of buildings which are in proper proportion to site areas as well as in character with the surrounding neighborhood. " Who is a better judge of how a home looks in a neighborhood than the people in the neighborhood. Over 35 property owners were notified of this variance, all of which live within 1000 feet of our property. Only two calls were made on property. My understanding both calls were not inquiring about the size of the deck or the size of the house. They were inquiring about the height of the house, which is not an issue . Not one resident has suggested that our house represents a "super structure" . We presume increasing the size of our deck by 223 square feet, and exceeding lot coverage by 4% would not put our house in to the "super structure" category. The American College Dictionary defines superstructure, (one word) r ' as : 1 . all of an edifice above the basement or foundation. 2 . any structure built on something else . 5 . anything erected on a foundation or basis . Assuming the Zoning Administrators use of the term super structure is the same superstructure as defined in the American College Dictionary every house in the City of Renton that is built on a foundation is a "super structure" . The lot coverage code provision as interpreted by the Zoning Administrator is very ambiguous and contradictory. Mr. Kaufman we feel the City has committed an error in it ' s denial of our variance request and hereby request your consideration. Sincerely yours, 7(51 f`'-`-- cs(`" • 2' °) c_.(4r) Randy ihda Ritualo ;r CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of •*'c-nlOxr' , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Li P• 61-t0 baCl lr (Signature of Sender) 2. k STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING ) cc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that r- I,A ee �_ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: _ i t(, ( c)� CQ� g1-0 11(n Notary Public in Od for the State of Wash` n MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES ProjeiE 2Xc0�,3 ITUcuc eck U0.V11) ter_ Project Number: qq - ttt , V NOTARY.DOC City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works & ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE DECISION LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE August 31, 1999 Project Name Ritualo Deck Variance Applicant Randy& Linda Ritualo File Number LUA-99-111, V-A Project Manager Lesley Nishihira Project Description The applicant is requesting an Administrative Variance from the maximum permitted lot coverage in the R-8 zone. The proposal would involve a 306 square foot addition to a deck and house for a total building footprint of 2,631 square feet. The proposal would result in a lot coverage by buildings of 38.9%-exceeding the maximum 35% permitted. Project Location 701 North 30th Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 2,632 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 306 square feet Site Area 7,550 square feet Total Building Area gsf 2,938 square feet 11 455 w wha-•. ��&V430-a.•a RENTON ' . ..`f.}+ -tlL'. i_m , -4 4 41 L/y�.,, w ,2b 4, / r�T:CGS 5t74`Cl: ";. :-q e_+um & li « KlY� i, f0 ,• �b =' Ei�p:'�Lp3p3yr�'I �f a'P>.8,.�� a sy 4t ; rrJ iN.■.•!Ll I "- 0 pia A ©iiiti -', 4i rm, 2 ... n jrlif V Yligirir' kg " pr tg 2 l'sr""1 1 .ir i 34.1 ! .' 3* st . a Eck iW Y[i5•0pmT0A],d',. •9 ym 10 '.Nit rtk sus p �Y `4LdPKs � Q a�.®oI.�1* To�.r .� j maims � =— dam; .. a .y.uy q &az:4,,i . w,S .� ate\\- ... N. ... - / 1 K.:,- yj �'� °ti 04 I r . : o • Il 4. 17 •Y \ » W TI i ,, P ZG'a wf of \', 4-.\-.1\� ,, .. .1 " •1>- , . N \ L \`\ \ ..•\ . 'i ill f ,_� c \ F R '. 1'1 r.._,nth, • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report RITUALO DECK VARIANCE LUA-99-111, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 2 of 5 A. Type of Land Use Action Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination x Administrative Variance B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.2: Drawing No. 1,Site Plan (Received August 5, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No.2, Elevations Plan (Received August 5, 1999). Exhibit No.4: Drawing No. 3, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received August 5, 1999). C. Project Description/Background: The applicants, Randy and Linda Ritualo, are requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the maximum permitted lot coverage in the Residential at 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8)zone. The subject site is located on the southeast corner of Lake Washington Boulevard and North 30th Street. The property, addressed as 701 North 30th Street, is currently under construction for an approved single family residence. As approved under Combination Building Permit No. CP99081, the residence currently satisfies all code provisions of the R-8 development standards. The development standards for the R-8 zone permit a maximum lot coverage by buildings of 35%for lots over 5,000 square feet in size (RMC section 4-2-110A). The building lot coverage is based on the total ground floor square footage of all structures located on the site. The applicant is proposing a 306 square foot deck addition to the approved 223 square foot deck and 2,409 square foot structure—for a total building footprint of 2,938 square feet. The proposal would increase the approved 34.9% lot coverage to 38.9%, which is 4% greater than the maximum permitted in the zone. The applicant contends the approval of the variance request would allow for the best use of the property by allowing for a larger deck. The proposal would also comply with all other development standards of the R-8 zone, including building setbacks and height. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicants, Randy and Linda Ritualo, have requested approval for an Administrative Variance for the property addressed as 701 North 30th Street. 2) Administrative Variance: The applicant's administrative variance application complies with the requirements for information for a variance. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 thru 4. admvar/ -. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report RITUAL()DECK VARIANCE LUA-99-111, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 3 of 5 3) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Single family residential, zoned R-8; South: Single family residential, zoned R-8; East: Single family residential, zoned R-8; and West: Single family residential, zoned R-8. 4) CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA Section 4-31-19F.3. lists 4 criteria that the Zoning Administrator is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. These include the following: The Zoning Administrator shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicants state in their variance justification that "the current deck allowed by the current building permit does not create the best use of the property." Additional arguments are made that the twelve foot wide deck would further enhance the value of the property when compared to the approved three foot wide deck. However, the potential for greater property value does not create an undue hardship. The applicants themselves point out that the initial review of their building permit found the proposal exceeded the maximum permitted lot coverage of the R-8 zone. At that point, it would have been appropriate for the applicants to revise their building plans in order to accommodate a larger deck if they so desired. Instead, the applicants chose to reduce the proposed deck size and pursue the approval of the permit. This decision was made with full knowledge of the applicable regulations and the understanding that the approved building was at the maximum lot coverage permitted. By pursuing the approval of the building permit for a 2,632 square foot structure on a 7,550 square foot site, the applicants created their own hardship. Furthermore, there are no unique circumstances on the property, such as size, shape, or topography, which necessitate the approval of the variance. The applicants also contend that the approval of the variance would allow them to enjoy the same rights and privileges enjoyed by adjacent property owners. Specifically, the applicants provided an analysis of the adjacent property, addressed as 2908 Lake Washington Boulevard, indicating that the existing structure exceeds the maximum lot coverage permitted. Because there are no records on file for this address (the City is not required to retain building permits for single family homes), staff was unable to confirm the lot coverage that was approved for the site. However, the presence of a singular nonconforming structure does not justify the approval of additional nonconforming structures in the area. In addition, the presence of decks in the area that are larger than 3 feet in width does not in and of itself deprive the applicants of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The granting of the variance would not result in direct materially detrimental impacts to the public welfare. It would, however, be injurious to surrounding property improvements in the vicinity and zone because it would allow for construction that differs from the standards that generally apply to all properties in the R-8 zone. Regardless of the visual enhancement the applicant contends the deck would provide for the property, the approval would set a precedent and create uncertainty about maintaining zoning standards which have been adopted to protect and enhance single family residential neighborhoods. Furthermore, the lot coverage code provision is intended to provide for a consistent residential aesthetic by limiting the percentage of a site that can be covered with connected or stand alone structures. The restriction serves to eliminate the potential for"super structures" and encourages the construction of buildings which are in proper proportion to site areas as well as in character with the surrounding neighborhood. admvar/ •• City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report RITUALO DECK VARIANCE LUA-99-111, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 4 of 5 c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The approval of the variance may be considered a grant of special privilege because it would provide an exception from a zoning standard that limits other properties under the same zoning designation. The privilege of larger decks enjoyed by adjacent property owners does not justify the subject property's excessive lot coverage. Those homes were designed in accordance with the R-8 development standards in such a way that larger decks could be accommodated. The applicants created their own hardship by seeking the approval of a building permit for a structure that would limit the potential size of their deck. d. That the approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The approval of the variance request is not the only means available for accomplishing the desired purpose of constructing a larger deck. The applicants could pursue a lot line adjustment to increase or decrease the area of their property, thereby modifying the potential lot coverage on the site. Although it may not be the most convenient solution, it is also possible to redesign or modify the structure to allow for a larger deck within code provisions. While the redesign of the structure should have occurred after the building permit's initial review, modifications are still entirely possible while construction is underway or even after it is complete. E. Conclusions 1. The subject site is located at 701 North 30th Street, within the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zoning designation. 2. The applicants submitted a combination building permit for review on May 20, 1999. After the initial review, the permit was denied due to the maximum lot coverage permitted in the R-8 zone. Subsequently, the applicants revised the application with the only change being the reduction of the deck's size. After demonstrating compliance with all development standards of the R-8 zone, the combination building permit was approved on July 15, 1999. On August 5, 1999, the applicants submitted an application requesting approval for a variance to exceed the maximum permitted lot coverage of the R-8 zone by allowing for the construction of a larger deck. 3. The R-8 zone limits lot coverage by buildings to a maximum of 35% (RMC section 4-2-110A). The applicant is proposing to exceed this maximum with a lot coverage of 38.9%. 4. The analysis of the proposal according to variance criteria is found in the body of the Staff Report. F. Decision The Administrative Variance for the Ritualo Deck, File No. LUA-99-111,V-A, is denied. SIGNATURE: /5 1 I 1‘ 7 Jana Hans n,Zoning Administrator date admvar/ 'City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Variance Staff Report RITUALO DECK VARIANCE LUA-99-111, V-A REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 31, 1999 Page 5 of 5 TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of September, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Randy and Linda Ritualo 14926 165th Place SE Renton,WA 98059 TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of September, 1999 to the parties of record: Emily Kjoback 807 North 30th Street Renton,WA 98056 Susan Miller 806 North 30th Street Renton,WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 3`d day of September, 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C. Duffy,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the date of approval. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 day appeal period(RCW 43.21.C.075(3);WAC 197-11-680). An appeal to the Hearing Examiner is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-113,which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 17, 1999. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. admvar/ • R •� / • . FRS R Z ,...r �`" ' j 1:'s'' . -' :syl r • ► =t�kt x J n�ti _. . .!F' • GENERAL NOTES _ •,, 17: ,...• • - ri Gi u.a..MYr.ra-•'ML•"'• - r•.If'.�I�r _ �. {�yr( t �� • • ru r•• runn rn O. r•►�nii►�imro.DEL. wwrcrr err ...Irr ul►` ......re'.nra./.1,�r.m...._va.a _ � �,.. lk� I.,�hl1 _ Chu. inns ...Ni"I.lr..a ..-.s..«�' _ !� • • _ wlnn _ 4.4 r�.+ Ra 1 R 11 ��o r....«_..J_....,•...4.► GLU-tAMINAIED wow MEMBERS fi/ 4 I T ' .fe ..r.1.4o..E.4 w.►..r..r•r..4.....r. CI....IJ...r.4.1=:....,r.Wr3• . -ameso o.. �r!:' I.I.dr:.Y 1..rlwra44w - - • air�w.r..•.r t1YWOOD nL..Irr:nx.moe 11 s,.1«eu►ten... P • , a :r.��awr...:r ya rr. .•J..i.M..w..I..J...�:...rl. _ -w.n.clr.l...s»f__.:..c w.MG Y....J..l l.a.....1.. 1 r'�POS� - _ -Jr 8W ":... .C.w.0 u-1 tiw_I•rr+..wr..4r..r....•. F!W_d.fi_.LL •.. e1,4eh..Y_Yr..I�.T_1N..I....a a...a.a lr ma...* F. ..r J.J.J...w1.r.r..enwe...r.l.u.....r.....w r F.- /I�/II�. i/• .. .,' IMES DEfX C� q@INI�FO..O�nm. , rr ./...w...rF,I.it err.w...wfJ fr��lr - _ M _ w ,.•.....r-R•r e.1 W...w..r�.Wy. •irrrrrr.r-r—J.r I...�.._.F.rr.a r•.w....ran r.lr. —.+ter.. r tir1...11-inn..I inn mr.r._.r14.r.. Ilmw....,. ••••.rr�.....1.rr.rlir r. • 1� I`PlJ✓w .4.Y.CIWwJ Ifwu...YJf.Jyr.J.�IYlw1. �rht.11. Y.mi.�.►m/.m....rF•f�.....J..r.1 if.♦ � • \ �L �.� ' • yI..I�aGWr...bi.w1..Y.iw..�r-...1sr,11.r..yMrr.wJ....tiM ON . _ T/� .. .Y.Mr.,_.VI.*We. •NI1•••••'wrr-_dr.JYrC 1K oft.NNWN.I�.K•.cm.I...rlfCfw.tfes.llrl>N 'Ir r , . _....arr ..aA ...1..inc.WMN..I......r...1.....1....ai VIII - J N�I....r 411......r..r 1.J..1. I r /�� M - W • bTRUCTUAA[.STEEL :-.w..,.*t—••�•YIr; I erY V r (`I) i • ....,...tors i....«.w....+a.l.....I 41*..l.4.4TI..w.f....r... QOORSANDWRVDOWS $ MISCELLA!FOI TrF/, u--Je�.W�rnyr �:OSMI,I..1.ul ...a....r<`rJ •.•21llwa.f rl no l..u...., ui1.,:.r.....NM ...r0xw N«..r 44. 1 ..4.1"...r.4.4.WI"..Y.err....•i:..ria rob - _ POI, ti Lr7 F+ealrl..-r 1mF IN..m.4M Ir..rr Sly.. ••••.Y..11r.w••1••...J•ecru w....n,waft 44 r lt.w. _ ...1 wl Ilw. 41r.440. 1...l1�..u4-.0 W.JM 4 r1N.Ma*WI.r ,,,,Nr....wr.l.I.cs...e4b1.. •H.�61..�F�.'U.'t -• - �1o,.W.Iduw..r r.F4..JJ..•.Yr.1..•.rn. r .J rIn MASONRY 1...r. i1114►Nr-II"1...•1 tr,....+. ...A.T.c. ..=.R -c1..1•...re.lr;Ir.L."r J..'J.J. T ` i xX NI ay ..Y fw .l.•...1.n...n......n.rr n..14et,W.d la*maIW I .. 171 Cm.•Or-fl.ral-. .a..4u........t....*.147 r.M. 11 �,;, 1 I,r svLA170N �._ - - 11 F7REYLACES� �1.1._................�.. ;.........�...r mw.N l•J,; 4..1r. .de.,.r. ww.Y.l ' I'- 14 - ` o�.`,."..w.rl...•r......:.:y.w.,,..,1..11.ar...14.n1•.•.efl..J.r rurcc.a..rnb Ls . w a.I.m a..r pa.T44w1.�1.uw.1........•fr...••...4 Jr.art.. .�'�•. Y....•••••1 l._Ira.w...w,.....1,1....n......... .. .....d...nt. ilocn rv. 4 •19 ?J u`�' ► N '' lift. 1 n..4e..4�.g....u.4w..1.w1 r....n..Ia. sLnrsuvice Y•I aco siM.0 n11 . N-q{GQ ' • r.1..��m...M ...In1.41....,..w......Y�..1InY.JJ wn,..IN r 4...ra 4wrtn1r4Ym 51i66L•Ib�'i I • 14 11...1....lmlm•in l.....N 1.r....1..I,..1 a 4..1...1...t- wx,•1l.na,a .u.IMef N...1 Le. .,S• n..'.•.4QLM .1 W.�, LUMBER STRENGTH(Unto in PSR C r w. 17 l A .iv 1 Ft v1, r M15CELLANEOUS NOIF3 - ce, .w.Mr „ .Gana.rrr,. f i •�Lo e.v�l..Ntoo • }� _. -imp » 1..JfW W U.Jr•••µ rl,a.h..,1...ws..w..a ,. • ... y p G.-nrn .�•i fY.fj n WK Ise w 1....nu._4w.�4.e r.N...1 me X.aa.. �� eu .Goaq.Al IS.c.lens. 1�i► .� a..�r.�'w.¢irfwlM.►...`a...,.a..e4.,a...i v.-fr.-icw.n...JI.....J4u.1 C • ••'. ..1::rJ..e .n a - ..�• - c�Ybmr:...Ow,.01 i.• 1... .ano r w.7.7'""r«�14.”•''........w..,,-f.....4, .7J'.47..1.r.Im1..'"J' - ...... q..y ry41 J r'. ......n.r..1..�rp1l w'rr.nr .�a6. • . ..moo i` .. o.. i. 4 f I site plan (.V '• leggl daseneti n ��� •E1Qat-6. v.L6U.rWW. f1a #_ At 1 r 11��rne►i ate+ mv+sia 1 1, To f N�J_s ��i ` 1 IF1 wl,.11 41•1 WY7iR r—--1 t City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ftvt- ''V?uurch COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-111,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST SON HRE APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs. Randy Ritualo PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley NiitiKritRFVl=pinri,, PROJECT TITLE: Ritualo Deck Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78567 AUG 1 LOCATION: 701 North 30th Street 81999 SITE AREA: 7,550 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,93& 4__ GE: r g i SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Variance from the 35% maximum lof-coverage by buildings limitation of the R-8 zone. The proposal would involve a 306 square foot addition to an existing deck and house (2,631 square feet)arriving at a lot coverage by buildings of 38.9%. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet NM B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,V C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where:dditional info tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. &dhSignal- . Director or Au rized epresentative Date routing Rev.10/93 City of Rent „ Department of Planning/Building/Public WG,— ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'CDlr\5kw.c'l0'hSeNtte< COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-111,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 1999 APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. Randy Ritualo PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira Crry OF RENTON rr.r, PROJECT TITLE: Ritualo Deck Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78567 AUG 1 LOCATION: 701 North 30th Street 8 1999 SITE AREA: 7,550 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,938 sq.ft. 8V ILLI"i= aiV'sio SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Variance from the 35% maximum lot coverage N by buildings limitation of the R-8 zone. The proposal would involve a 306 square foot addition to an existing deck and house (2,631 square feet) arriving at a lot coverage by buildings of 38.9%. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS a Va We have r iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re additional information is neede to properly assess this proposal. nature of Director Authorized Representati Date p routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: MZWV Rev 1euJ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-111,V-A DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 1999 CIcar OFR FNrTON APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs. Randy Ritualo PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira 41f� 1 8 1999 ' PROJECT TITLE: Ritualo Deck Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78567 LOCATION: 701 North 30th Street � I��;iiii6 GIB/ISON SITE AREA: 7,550 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,938 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Variance from the 35% maximum lot coverage by buildings limitation of the R-8 zone. The proposal would involve a 306 square foot addition to an existing deck and house (2,631 square feet)arriving at a lot coverage by buildings of 38.9%. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS U0 6-0w1kVed. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation�f/( is n ede to properly assess this proposal. il'q191 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: RITUALO DECK VARIANCE APPLICATION NO: t-CIA • 141 11 1 ) v _ f� The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SEE LIST ATTACHED (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SEE LIST ATTACHED Applicant Certification RANDY RITUALO , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: O City of Renton Technical Services Records al Title Company Records O King County Assessors Records Signe CGLC ›kaL w `?•',\�r.--�T?''i''.,�ate tS/sue/�/ (Applicant) •5 X%•. • le NOTARY N • •° IOTA' ATTESTED: ubs ribed and swori�b l'pEp rpO13i3l ;n`ram. blic, in an for the State of Washington, residing at LJ nu r� ��,1, •g4Li.,t n44i.?l''�, day of f .M g U. f , 19 Signed "l iS ',�'s •�OF W P �w% (Notary P ) ****For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAILING MARILYN KAhiCHEFF lc I, ' o.v & . . �ev, hereby certify that notices of the proposed ap• •4 T, • ,� (City Employee) each listed property owner on 6 • Is •°la M J tUNEE 29.29 EXPIRES 2003 Signed ckr : • See 4 8 . - Date: 1 0 • ° � M 11 NOTARY ATTE : Sullocribed and sworn before me, a Notary Pub', in and for the State of Washington residing at 1 .'7 cZteti on the ,.J, , /1- day of .c , 19c`2 Signed :")e t,,°z-c/.' 'I")�r,.' ray; listprop.doc REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY a'R°INTMENT EXPIRES;6.2 2 9-03 MetroScan/King(WA) ' Owner : Bergeron Oma Lee Parcel# : 334210 0510 02 Site : 808 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date :08/22/1994 Mail : 808 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $139,900 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 15-16 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,260 Ac: .16 YB:1950 Ph: 425-226-0935 Owner : Burlington Northrn Santa Fe Parcel# : 312405 9004 07 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date . Mail : 1700 E Golf Rd#400 Schaumburg Il 60173 Sale Price . Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V . Lgl : STR 312405 TAXLOT 4 BN FORMERLY NP Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 6.50 YB: Ph: Owner : Burroughs John D/Sue R Parcel# : 334210 4010 09 Site :2815 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 10/18/1991 Mail :2815 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $707,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $649,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 77-79-80 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R :05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H:2 / /1 Stories:2 BldgSF: 3,200 Ac: .17 YB:1930 Ph:425-271-0226 Owner : Fix M Monica Parcel# : 334210 3930 08 Site : 3007 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date :07/26/1996 Mail : 3007 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $520,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $523,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 64-65 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,400 Ac: .38 YB:1949 Ph:425-271-8094 Owner : Frisvold Larry A/Cynda B Parcel# : 334210 0556 07 Site : 707 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date :08/31/1994 Mail : 707 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $222,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $228,000 Lgl : BLK 9 LOT 6-7 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,590 Ac: .16 YB:1976 Ph:425-227-6789 Owner : Galster Martin F;Dubois Peggi L Parcel# : 334210 3985 02 Site :2905 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 01/21/1994 Mail : 2907 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $603,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 73-74-75 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 360 Ac: .37 YB:1947 Ph:425-271-7902 Owner : Galster Martin F;Dubois Peggi L Parcel# : 334210 3985 02 Site : 2905 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date :01/21/1994 Mail : 2907 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $603,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 73-74-75 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 1 /2 / Stories: I BldgSF: 2,580 Ac: .37 YB:1947 Ph:425-271-7902 Owner :Guntle Erma E Parcel# : 334210 0430 09 Site : 814 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 814 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $100,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 19 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm :2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 980 Ac: .11 YB:1973 Ph:425-255-4079 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King(WA) Owner : Hamadeh Nabil S/Ghada A Parcel# : 334210 0485 03 Site : 2908 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/16/1995 Mail :2908 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $340,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $366,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 9 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H: 3 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 3,360 Ac: .15 YB:1990 Ph: Owner : Kingen Robert J Parcel# : 334210 0380 09 Site : 3014 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 3014 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $262,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 9-10 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,520 Ac: .21 YB:1956 Ph:425-255-1790 Owner : Kjobech Emily B Parcel# : 334210 0454 00 Site : 807 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 807 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $220,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 5-6-7 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,190 Ac: .40 YB:1946 Ph: 206-255-3139 Owner : Larson D Parcel# : 334210 0400 05 Site : 718 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 718 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $182,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 13-14 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1.5 BldgSF:2,300 Ac: .23 YB:1943 Ph:425-255-4285 Owner : Marshall R C B Parcel# : 334210 3953 00 Site : 2909 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 2909 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $575,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 69 THRU 72 HILLMANS LK Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm :2 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,520 Ac: .47 YB:1953 Ph: Owner : Maxwell Steven A/Marcie A Parcel# : 334210 4009 02 Site :2827 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/14/1993 Mail : PO Box 2048 Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $680,000 Full LTSe : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $684,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 76-77-78 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:4,470 Ac: .25 YB:1973 Ph: Owner : Mc Clelland Gary W Parcel# : 334210 0500 04 Site : 806 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/20/1990 Mail : 806 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $299,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $286,000 Lgl :BLK 8 LOT 14 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H:2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF:2,160 Ac: .11 YB:1990 Ph: Owner : Merrell Agnes K Parcel# : 334210 0390 07 Site : 3004 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 3004 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $215,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 11-12 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,300 Ac: .19 YB:1955 Ph: 425-255-8498 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King(WA) Owner : Miller Brian W Parcel# : 334210 0410 03 Site : 806 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 806 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $224,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 15-16 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,120 Ac: .23 YB:1940 Ph: 206-228-1868 Owner : Morrison Sylvia Parcel# : 334210 3920 00 Site : 3011 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 1401 N 34Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $557,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 62-63 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,520 Ac: .45 YB:1949 Ph: Owner : Murray Michael E Parcel# : 334210 0360 03 Site : 801 N 31St St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 07/10/1987 Mail : 801 N 31St St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $106,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $188,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 6 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,380 Ac: .11 YB:1987 Ph:425-271-2135 Owner :Nation Terry Lynn Guardian Parcel# : 334210 4040 03 Site :2807 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/20/1996 Mail :2807 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $229,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $220,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 82 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:440 Ac: .01 YB:1928 Ph: Owner :Not Available From County Parcel# : 334210 0490 06 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : 11/03/1997 Mail : 7625 111Th PI SE Newcastle Wa 98056 Sale Price : $100,000 Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $65,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 13 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: Owner : Peterson Eric J/Kimberly J Parcel# : 334210 0345 03 Site : 809 S 31St St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 02/02/1993 Mail : 1007 N 36Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $120,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 3-4 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm :2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 820 Ac: .23 YB:1943 Ph:425-226-1151 Owner : Pfeifle Helen Parcel# : 334210 0420 01 Site : 812 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 812 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $106,700 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 17-18 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1.5 BldgSF: 1,650 Ac: .23 YB:1900 Ph:425-255-0712 Owner : Ritualo Randy D/Linda S Parcel# : 334210 0480 08 Site : 2912 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 03/12/1997 Mail : 14926 165Th PI SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price : $167,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $136,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 8 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm :2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,800 Ac: .17 YB:1915 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King(WA) Owner : Roberts Melissa T Parcel# : 334210 0355 00 Site : 805 N 31St St Renton 98056 Sale Date :05/28/1987 Mail : 805 N 31St St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $62,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $120,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 5 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm :2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 860 Ac: .11 YB:1924 Ph: Owner : Rynning Mary Parcel# : 334210 0440 07 Site : 819 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 819 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $178,100 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 1-2 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H:2 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,960 Ac: .23 YB:1959 Ph: Owner : Sanchez Alex;Duarte-Sanchez Melania Parcel# : 334210 0555 08 Site : 703 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/22/1996 Mail : 703 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $281,500 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $287,000 Lgl : BLK 9 LOT 6-7 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:2,420 Ac: .15 YB:1980 Ph:425-271-6587 Owner : Savoy Donald L Parcel# : 334210 3906 08 Site : 3015 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/27/1984 Mail : 3015 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $279,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 59-60-61 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,520 Ac: .28 YB:1944 Ph: Owner : Shane Agnes E;Shane Family Limited Partn Parcel# : 334210 3940 06 Site : 3003 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 12/29/1993 Mail : 2519 6Th Ave Seattle Wa 98121 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $604,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 66 TO 69 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R :05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 /2 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,300 Ac: .56 YB:1949 Ph: Owner : Spengler Scott R;Bain-Spengler Marsha Parcel# : 334210 0475 05 Site : 2902 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 08/30/1995 Mail : 2902 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $390,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $408,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 10-11 HILMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 2 / /2 Stories: 1 BldgSF:4,100 Ac: .23 YB:1990 Ph:425-204-6000 Owner : Sprout Christina R Parcel# : 334210 0495 01 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : 11/03/1997 Mail : 7625 111Th P1 SE Newcastle Wa 98056 Sale Price : $90,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $65,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 12 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: Owner : Stetler Daniel R/Tracy Parcel# : 334210 0375 06 Site : 707 N 31St St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/01/1999 Mail : 707 N 31St St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $255,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $224,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 8 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H:2 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,540 Ac: .11 YB:1997 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King(WA) Owner : T-Pan Inc Parcel# : 334210 0370 01 Site : 711 S 31 St St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 06/30/1998 Mail : 1201 N 33Rd St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $92,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $72,000 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 7 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R :05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 320 Ac: .11 YB:1946 Ph: Owner : Tomich Pauline M Parcel# : 334210 0385 04 Site : 3010 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 3008 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $173,100 Lgl : BLK 7 LOT 10-11 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,280 Ac: .20 YB:1955 Ph:425-255-9462 Owner : Trautmann Robert F/Carolyn M Parcel# : 334210 0546 00 Site : 809 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/12/1995 Mail : 809 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $177,500 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $171,000 Lgl : BLK 9 LOT 4-5 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,100 Ac: .17 YB:1960 Ph:425-235-6930 Owner : Wallace Glenn A Jr&Ann E Parcel# : 334210 0540 06 Site : 813 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/15/1986 Mail : 813 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $98,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $189,000 Lgl : BLK 9 LOT 3-4 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF:2,200 Ac: .17 YB:1959 Ph:425-271-5645 Owner : Wielgos Thomas A Parcel# : 334210 4029 08 Site :2811 Mountain View Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail :2811 Mountain View Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $616,000 Lgl : BLK A LOT 79-80-81 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H:2 / / Stories: 1.5 BldgSF:2,870 Ac: .09 YB:1987 Ph: Owner : Wong-Garl Linda S Parcel# : 334210 0512 00 Site : 816 N 29Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/21/1991 Mail : 816 N 29Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $140,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $150,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 16-17 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,240 Ac: .14 YB:1953 Ph: Owner :Zilmer Andrew B/Mark E/Rosemary Parcel# : 334210 0449 08 Site : 815 N 30Th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 03/14/1997 Mail : 815 N 30Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $150,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $154,000 Lgl : BLK 8 LOT 3-4 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SE S : 31 T:24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,360 Ac: .17 YB:1948 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • ♦ ♦ NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99.111,V-A i RITUALO DECK VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Variance from the 35%maximum lot coverage by buildings limitation of the R-8 zone.The proposal would involve a 306 square foot addition to an existing deck and house(2,631 square feet)arriving at a lot coverage by buildings of 38.9%. PROJECT LOCATION: 701 North 30°'Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Variance(V-A) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division.1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on August 30,1999. If you have questions about this proposal.or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Ms.Nishihira at(125)430-7270.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 5,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Augus(f/c.1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: Augusta..1999 ..,.;I • - �-.m'H B 3' . ,._fl v Ib Ufa J•. F AVr-r , tag,: fpy71, m-a 41 9qr m Frig:„! ,,3�- ,_?-,•;-11 •° I. er�1` 9 hlr.T 41 =`,4 0---3! d5 m9 'd , , :_ __.4 JII a Fp.- if. ').BSI .�. 1565 ry dd y ''',q'rsl k-pAi I'1� 0m: 1>'�,�ti:a i9' r n k'•TEA • y, i I uw.7,44,•45.. 94,it 0gi; 1 kG :i.. Ugh o P is s 8 f b d• 1 d �4..11474.2 t ,1 St4� ¢�ae6; f�dl dfb of q�•'`1-. ■' 1JI s .,,-.-a..c. L i,:+P� - — a md a-A Illlll • T� ,\�4.r •r43. f ,�,,\. °l{p ..p ,A e. t1 0•'at \\ °1 , •,•4 \s‘ teaw4. g .�'• a ; - ,.jr• I..i • V CERTIFICATION I, (, s 1,C,,.1 N 1-511 i 11 lyri , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Vvedvusda A- .pic - I : C'i�r ( . Signed: .e ` 1, -`'u ATTEST: Subcribed worn before me, a Nortary Publ}c, in and for State of Washington residing ' , on the Q`7 ''day of L ILYN CHEFF • C z r�-� s i rARy PURLIC TE OF WASHmmEx ING MARILYN ; pa P ..,"-.,..•� E--, 031RES A I E EEXPIRES:6-29.03 �..<;...:, •. T` CITY „F RENTON NLL "`�. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 17, 1999 Mr. & Mrs. Randy Ritualo 14926— 165th Place SE Renton,WA 98059 SUBJECT: Ritualo Deck Variance Project No. LUA-99-111,V-A Dear Mr. & Mrs. Ritualo: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1(/41//6-(-) /2/1-4 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ::::: :: :: LAND usE PERMIT TER APPLICATION PROPERTY•OWNER(S) • PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: RANDY & LINDA RITUALO RITUALO DECK wARIANCE 14926 16 5TH PLACE SE PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: _ 701 NORTH 3 0 TH STREET RENTON, WA 98056 CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): RENTON, WA 98059 334210 — 0480 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425-271-2882 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE APPLLCANT (if other than owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: RSF ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NOT APPLICABLZ)k-1./ECOP MENT CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: d ry OF/BEN PLAN,„ R - 8 Ali(; l i 1999 TELEPHONE NUMBER: �E PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CEVEo CONTACT PERSON; • • • • ••• • • • • NOT APPLICABLE SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: • RANDY RITUALO 7550 SQ. FT. , CORNER LOT COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: NOT APPLICABLE $ 2, 892 . 65 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 14926 165TH PLACE SE NO CITY: ZIP: RENTON, WA 98059 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-271-2882 NO LEGAL DESC ION OF PROPERTY (Attach s �a�;a.e sheet if necessary LOT 8, BLOCK 8, OF C. D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11, PAGE 63, IN KING COUNTY; WASHINGTON TYPE QI=APPLICATI'ON PEAS Check all application types that.apply City staff w�tl determine fees ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT _ $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT _ $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT — $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT — $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT — $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE _ LOT COVERAGE $1 n 0 no (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT _ $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS:— $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charc e ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ AFFIDQVIT.OF .OWNERSHIP LINDA RITUALO I, (Print Name)RANT)Y RTTrTAT( , declare that I am (please check one)x__the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respec49,012Mrdbpfrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. 446 "g 10 N �` Z •, LINDA RITUALO w ;"x4� A�,�••�T: ibscribed nd sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and RANDY RITUALO :ca 'Nu A• 'cc the st to of 'I !siding at (Na a of Owne / sentative) we,,^^ _ on the `3 ay of Signature gOwner/Representative) ',,,C)P WAS2- "}"2ggignature of Notary blic) • (T Is section to be completed by Ci: Staff ) City F118 Number•:; ; A A.11D BSp CAP$ CAI U CPA CU A CU H EC1" LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R RUMP SA A SA H SHPL A SHPL;H SR SM SME TP V B �f-H W TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED > $�W-- • `?C '•► MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 Randy a Linda Ritualo 14926 165th Place SE—Renton,WA 98059 Phone 425-271-2882—Fax 425-271-2883- Email TCANDSI@4OL.COM August 0411h1v9 p�N1c�g EN-voN City of Renton cievEC N GF Development Services Division " 1g9g 1055 South Grady Way Aki`' Renton, Washington 98055 R G�C,\IE Re: Ritualo Deck Variance Project -Justification for Variance Request Dear Development Services Employees: We are requesting a variance from our building permit#CP99081 in conjunction with the construction of our new home located at 701 N. 30th, Renton, WA., the Kennydale area. The variance requested is to exceed the maximum lot coverage of 35%, which would enable us to have a twelve foot wide deck as oppose to a three foot wide deck that is currently authorized by the aforementioned building permit. Current lot coverage, as provided by the building permit, is 34.9%. This includes a 223.25 square foot deck. The footprint of the house as provided by the building permit is 2631.90 square feet. The lot is 7550 square feet. We hereby request that we be allowed to increase the size of the deck from 223.25 square feet to 530 square feet. This increases the footprint of the house to 2938.65 square feet, an increase of deck space of 306.75 square feet, which yields lot coverage of 38.9%. Such an increase of an additional nine feet towards Lake Washington Blvd., would increase the width of the deck across the west end of the house from three feet wide to twelve feet wide. This enlarged foot print would still be within the legal lot line setbacks for a corner lot in the City of Renton. As applicants for this variance we state the following: a. The current deck allowed by the current building permit does not create the best use of the property. The value of this particular building site, rests with the 180 degree view of Lake Washington. A useable deck, such as the one designed in the proposed plans, i.e. the twelve foot wide deck, makes the best use of this view. A twelve foot wide deck certainly enhances the value of the property more than a three foot wide deck does. Allowing a twelve foot wide deck would allow us to enjoy the same rights and privileges enjoyed by the two property owners immediately to the south of us. These two homes are identified as 2902 &2908 Lake Washington Blvd., N. The home next door to our site, 2908 Lake Washington Blvd. N., is a home of more square footage than our home and is situated on a lot of only 6507 square feet. Review of the current site plan of this home reveals total lot coverage in excess of 35%, please reference the enclosed site plan for 2908 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Both homes, 2908 &2902, in this block of Lake Washington Blvd. N., enjoy decks larger than three feet wide. The strict application of the Building Code that addresses lot of coverage not to exceed 35%for lots in excess of 5000 square feet deprives us of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification, thus we would suffer an undue hardship. b. The granting of the requested variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone where are property is situated. To the contrary the house with the extended deck will visually enhance the property as well those looking at the property. Granting of the variance will have little if any impact on public welfare since the property will still be situated with in the legal setbacks prescribed by the current building code. , The deck design we are proposing does not represent an impervious surface such as a driveway or concrete patio. This deck will not collect water and thus will have not have an injurious impact on our property, properties in the vicinity of our property, waste water management or the sewer system. c. Allowing us to increase the size of the deck, by building it twelve feet wide vs. three feet wide, does not constitute the granting of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone where our property is situated. As previously stated, the two homes in the same block as ours, enjoy the benefits of decks wider than three feet. The home identified as 2908 Lake Washington Blvd., N., is a larger home than the one we are building situated on a lot that is 1000 square feet smaller than our lot. This home enjoys a deck in excess of three feet wide on the Lake Washington Blvd. N., side. d. The approval of this request for a variance, as approved by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment, is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. All that is being requested is to extend the approved deck by an additional nine feet towards Lake Washington Blvd., N. This represents a total increase in the size of the footprint of the house by 306.75 square feet. We are asking for lot coverage be allowed to be increased from 34.9%to 38.9%, a four 4% increase of the total lot coverage. The house with the proposed 530 square foot deck will be within the lot line setbacks currently allowed for a corner lot in the City of Renton. Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Randy&•nda Ritual() Enclosure: 2908 Lk. Wash. Blvd. N. Site Plan , --, 0?Lo7 ? _.-- /\\ _ 4,7,4,tu ...Air" 78 -0,4Lc..) ;c ,ra t2 IA ,--1C ��\I7, 3.S?,f K,A-�/2/t1 RI A- ._7E.61& te... r .,,mesa waosai.rr N d'' FIE COPY N�-c t 1ir,e.:;. Ft;he Check a,.pm .errors ono ornisgk n$ +iil iut arovr \ A. 1.4110'izc' 1 .G Violation it adc4 :ec` 2- CIE) r�.aSFi � �. nanco. t c•coipt of oontradOes copy c •,x1c71. • Z`r- �•J, c c��a . acknowledged. Date J �- i- 96 Permit No. t)\ C\ask ;l Ark _...- 6V >--_-:__ ____._N.. ....__?......... • ;, D k _, LET - [�SC7 'LAL. : 1`=20' (:'J -14 lfauS6-th i`447-7 u . to , r.( Ar✓(.... S I T� /S t1.Ea-k 0 g73.cv �6 )- �4 id - To r,¢t- 23L1 3 7 n I �; Cr) CeJ I/h6,t '. Y I `p' .I ! ._ t ?LLK(-- /_ ,1.3 7 o WI . i, kw., La Tr = 3� 24 Io . 4'I L se?.o� '�.r, In — �- — � CITY OF RENT CANf,I_ _I BUILDII\IG DfViSrN tE.te7'�K I APPROVED For Conetru : m ?je?ct To -Cs CorrCc;' n �: ,o ir1 i'-•d -in 6y .A.—_ — S' N+�- D. _ _ - — OR\VE Wt\Y CO1 ' 5.4 ALLEY N \_1;:CA i' D SGRIPTipty: L07- G ,tN BLOCK 8 OF CD, \41 LLM /10N'5 1-1\< W4S!-1)NGTC)N CIAP1/4tE'N OF EVEN i-,\tiDITID 1NL TO SF•ATTL.E NO, I I•�S ••�R PAT RE LORD E. b \N VOLUME: \t OF PLATS , PA,G, R c OR>3, OF \(IIJC C-OU\fl\' S17vAc-v a INTH_ cr OF RE , <(• r>.. C.-OVI\IT 1e 0C:: K\NC, S-TA-r vF V \ 4C iv NI / . r...-...._._..-- ?' / G yp �� l' N BUILDING ON '.,', 4S�, V APPROVAL IS FOR BONO PERMIT ONLY ,P FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL 4 SEE RESPECT' CODES 1, Randy a Linda Ritualo 14926 165th Place SE-Renton,WA 98059 Phone 425-271-2882-Fax 425-271-2883-Email TCANDSI@AOL.COM August 04, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Ritualo Deck Variance Project- Request for Variance to Exceed Lot Coverage - Project Narrative Dear Development Services Employees: On July 16, 1999 we obtained from the City of Renton building permit#CP99081 for the exclusive purpose of constructing a new single family residence to be located at 701 North 30th Street, Renton, WA 98056. The original architect's plans for our home reflected the footprint of the house to be 2,938.65 square feet including a 530 square foot deck on the west end of the home that fronts on Lake Washington Blvd. North. The total square footage of the lot is 7550 square feet. This yields building coverage of 38.9% The maximum building coverage prescribed by Development Standards for Single Family Residential Zoning designation of R-8 for a lot in excess of 5000 square feet is 35% coverage. To obtain the aforementioned building permit we reduced the size of the deck from 530 square feet to 223.25 square feet. The deck in the current building plans for which we have received a permit for, removed nine feet of deck across the width of the house leaving a three foot wide deck across the front of the house. We are hereby requesting a variance to exceed the 35% coverage maximum by adding 306.75 square feet of deck. The increased deck will still be within all set back limits. The following information is provided as requested in the"Variance Submittal Requirements": The name of the project will be the Ritualo Residence Deck, located at 701 N. 30th St., Renton, WA. A request is made to increase the size of the deck from 223.25 square feet to 530 square feet. This increases maximum lot coverage from 34.9%to 38.9%. The lot square footage is 7550. The footprint of the house with the proposed deck will be 2938.65 square feet. The total square footage of the house as listed on the building permit is 3909 square feet on two levels. Zoning of the site and adjacent properties is Single Family Residential, R-8. Prior to June 5, 1999, a single family residence was located on the property. On June 5, 1999, that home was demolished. Construction on our new residence commenced on July 16, 1999. The site contains no special features, i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes. ENT PANNING The soil on the site is sandy and drains well. MEW. REGENED The proposed use of the property is to demolish the single family residence that was on the site and build a new single family residence with lot coverage increased from 34.9%to 38.9% on a corner lot with overall square footage of 7550 . The entire house will have 3909 total square feet, including the garage, with a proposed 530 square feet of deck on the west end of the house. The living space will be on two floors. The height of the house at it's highest point will be 29 feet. The completed home will provide two parking spaces, other than the garage, within the boundaries of the property. Access to the home will be on the east end of the property which is currently an alley servicing three other residents. The City of Renton has plans for off-site improvements. We were notified during our building permit process that the City of Renton will install a fire hydrant within three hundred feet of the site at the northwest corner of N. 30th and Burnett Ave., N. We have been told this would be done within four from June 23, 1999. The only other off-site improvements we are aware of are part of the City of Renton's Master Plan, to improve water flow along N. 30th from Burnett Ave. N. to Lake Washington Blvd. The actual time frame of this improvement is unknown to us. The estimated construction costs of the increased deck size will be$2,893.00. The entire allowance for total decks within the project is$5,000.00. The estimated construction costs of the residence are $337,710.00. The completed home has been appraised at$460,000.00. Excavation has been done. After back filling, any excess native soil will be removed from the site. No fill of any type will be used or deemed necessary. Only one tree existed on the property and it was removed upon demolition of the former residence. The tree removed was a chestnut tree. No land will be dedicated to the city. We have attempted to provide all required information. We have been assisted in understanding what needs to be submitted with a request for an administrative variance by C. Roy Publico, Planning Technician, Development Services Division - Development/Planning. Should further information be needed please, contact us at the numbers listed on this letter. Sincerely, Randy & Ei da Ritualo � ►�u,4 w = v'4�-�,t-�7z ` �.��� -.T 4)eit444 tr.)A- . 1.3S44 r� . �+ vJAslt 'P �. 55 44.- RiTuALo KE51r7C0c.0 • • -- Low' 8 -Py or is a C 1-�Iu4a5 64a7 OG cJsJ 1)10WS►o•.J 1 . vat_ 11 IP64.:3 14.1.44. Go, w4, N 7SSa - 1 LCT I =2C^C" �Rmh yt� t-4uu6 I71-z.IT G44.., Gog4,,sa nEUt DEuc 2�3, Z 26.31.`los�SSa.'3 341a 15 li N 4 - cfN • �1�„RDcr _ fi 5 FFE3.J1 Q DR►�� (N4 GQ4or:@ 7,5 * Eu ,I19.S 4-LEI' IIFwffT CONSTAUCTION CORE 13644 S.F. 137a ST. *SAM OA WA 98027 07 - 30—�� tc� g�J� ITSAKi P"oti2�;� -t " Tl1A-E-O ib — �url+��ri Ldr € -B.o 8 CD �9 • S 4 I L-I-MA,.JS ,LD��/oL � ►� c Ji Sr pn/ /I liQ L 11 ram., 6 3, k,�e, ('r� rO .4r_ r7 of �uSE r�/�-sr4 PIA raFLooIL 1�i7 f� g U t'P t=c�� t \- 7S2) — 1 Lor Gi4�At,,E L(e8 r"Ct p \ r I ,, , i IO Te-gm r T 'LA'J -3u t LbrJ(, t4-E 16047 l .2 rj' Vt0r'bw t�c7 SEr 3,4._k-S t?io : Nausc I'in. ►S 3 Sa+ Sr be; S' Nvi D'(--k 213.2 S 009115 OE 20 �As'rs,at �I2 �t --roT..L. 1431,50 3urs�N„�„ SFr9Acrs Co�� —• izFhlt7M-I, c I�o&TuSr k IS' Idl GA#I- Il/E31 - .`z4nlsasa:, S' l�w/io° a!•14,5,• Z CoJCkf}E,L s:ser Zo ' t� Ts,tea% z° `— 14 Ai 3 2- 3 I.�t 0 1, � r `M 0� /MPEkvious Sul.rACr`� # - Ler 751-0•CV 'DLrllEc.ir( iSo 0 Ito N/At.LJA'IS 10o dr TA OF LA./St.t?r.Jb� 4cri1 ¢ 1,11-1e T ,tt, 2I�ct% µoust 1712,I5 ct Ia 1 L 630.0° • 4.0 7,Lo'?osob ..,sr CoJcz-& T Lam, 2136.-c 1,0-r 1S921•4,u /1LLL'I - . ; �r'/ ,4 D ESS ; `7C''/ ii. ` CTit (- . i Ik 1Y�A L 6 �6-�� Pa2 / ,4,JC� lZ,•,r--u•, L.,el r d , DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE'PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY BY • Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control';Planz Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3ar,o4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded,Copy), Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map,'if applicable a Floor Plans 3ANo4 Geotechnical Reportznrw3 , f Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed ` King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping.Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 •'' Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards,(one per monument) , • Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)s Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 A)R,l/t/ Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan Wetlands Study This requirement may be waived by: 1 Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: R TtALO \/Al ANCE _ 2 Public Works Plan Review Section 3 Building Section DATE: JULY � , t7c9 4 Development Planning Section **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/05/99 13 :20 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9903843 Amount : 112 . 54 08/05/99 13 :20 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 2026RITUALO Init: CRP Project # : LUA99-111 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334210-0480 Site Address : 701 N 30TH ST Total Fees : 112 . 54 This Payment 112 . 54 Total ALL Pmts : 112 . 54 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 100 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 12 .54