Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Final Agenda Packet
CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, September 27, 2021 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councilmembers are attending this meeting remotely through Zoom. Audience comments will be accommodated through Zoom. Speakers must click the link to the registration form (linked below), fill it out, and submit it by 5 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting. The public may also submit comments in writing to cityclerk@rentonwa.gov by 5 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Registration is not required for those who wish to speak during public hearings. Registration for Audience Comment Registration will be open at all times, but speakers must register by 5 p.m. on the day of a Council meeting in order to be called upon. Anyone who registers after 5 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting will not be called upon to speak and will be required to re-register for the next Council meeting if they wish to speak at that next meeting. • Request to Speak Registration Form • You may also copy/paste the following URL into your browser: https://forms.office.com/g/bTJUj6NrEE • You may also call 425-430-6501 or email jsubia@rentonwa.gov or cityclerk@rentonwa.gov to register. Please provide your full name, city of residence, email address and/or phone number, and topic in your message. • Instructions for Virtual Attendance For those wishing to attend by Zoom, please (1) click this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84938072917?pwd=TUNCcnppbjNjbjNRMWpZaXk2bjJnZz09 (or copy the URL and paste into a web browser) or (2) call-in to the Zoom meeting by dialing 253- 215-8782 and entering 849 3807 2917 Passcode 156708, or (3) call 425-430-6501 by 5 p.m. on the day of the meeting to request an invite with a link to the meeting. Those providing audience comments will be limited to 5 minutes each speaker unless an exception is granted by the Council. Attendees will be muted and not audible to the Council except during times they are designated to speak. Advance instructions for how to address the Council will be provided to those who sign up in advance to speak and again during the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION a) Diaper Need Awareness Week - September 6 - October 3, 2021 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT a) Administrative Report 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of September 20, 2021. Council Concur b) AB - 2945 Community & Economic Development Department recommends adoption of the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and approval of the collection of the requested 2021 impact fees: Renton - Single-Family $2,659 (decrease of $5,022), Multi-Family $4,737 (decrease of $252); Kent - Single-Family $5,818.09 (increase of $125.24), Multi-Family $2,457.53 (increase of $52.90); and Issaquah - Single-Family $20,291 (increase of $2,078), Multi-Family $8,353 (increase of $3,690). These are pass-through fees collected on behalf of the respective school districts, and the City will collect a five (5) percent administrative fee for administering this program. Refer to Planning & Development Committee c) AB - 2952 Parks & Recreation Department requests authorization to waive open space and field rental space fees at the Cedar River Park, in the amount of $2,877.50, for the Environmental Science Center to host local school groups to the Cedar River for STEM- based Salmon Heroes field trips. Refer to Finance Committee d) AB - 2953 Parks & Recreation Department recommends approval to execute a King County Get Active, Stay Active grant agreement (subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney Department), in order to accept $10,000 in grant funds for the Gift of Play scholarship program to cover registration fees for nearly 150 participants. Refer to Finance Committee e) AB - 2954 Finance Department submits the 2021/2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Calendar, and requests public hearings be set on October 18, 2021 and November 1, 2021 to consider the 2022 Property Tax Levy, proposed Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment, and Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustments. Refer to Committee of the Whole; Set Public Hearings on 10/18/2021 & 11/1/2021 f) AB - 2956 Equity, Housing, and Human Services Department submits Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-361, contract with REACH Center of Hope, in the amount of $115,000 for additional assistance needed due to a COVID-related relocation. Council Concur 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Finance Committee: Vouchers; Authorization to Purchase Equipment for the Safe Routes to Transit Program, CAG-20-156; Change Order No. 12 to CAG-20-001 with Cascade Civil Construction, LLC for the Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project; 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) / 21EMPG-ARPA Award Obligation Letter; Authorization to Hire Associate Planner at Step E; Authorization to Hire Civil Engineer III at Step D; Authorization to Hire Grants Program Manager at Step E; Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) Round 2 Funds b) Planning & Development Committee: Update to Clean Economy Strategy with Cascadia Consulting Group; Rainier/Grady Junction Subarea Plan Update; Termination of the 2019 Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement for Sunset Terrace Apartments; Adoption of 2021 School District Capital Facilities Plans and Impact Fees 8. LEGISLATION Ordinance for second and final reading: a) Ordinance No. 6027: Solera Street Vacation Petition (VAC-20-002) (First Reading 9/20/2021) 9. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 10. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) CANCELLED Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings ArmondoPavoneMayorProcCamationWfiereas,diaperneed,theconditionofnothavingasufficientsupplyofcleandiapers,canadverselyaffectthehealthandwell-beingofbabies,toddlers,andtheirfamilies;and‘I44ereas,nationalsurveysandresearchstudiesreportthatoneinthreefamiliesstruggleswithdiaperneedand48percentoffamiliesdelaychangingadiapertoextendtheirsupply;andW’fiereas,childrengothroughsixtotwelvediaperseachdayandwithoutenoughdiapers,babiesandtoddlersriskinfectionsandhealthproblems;andWfiereas,purchasingenoughdiaperstokeepababyortoddlerclean,dry,andhealthycanconsume14percentofalow-wagefamily’spost-taxincome,makingitdifficulttoobtainasufficientsupply;andWñereas,thepeopleofRentonrecognizediaperneedasapublichealthissue,disproportionatelyharmingblackfamilies,indigenousfamilies,andfamiliesofcolor,andacknowledgethataddressingdiaperneedwillleadtomoreequitableeconomicopportunitiesandimprovedhealthforallchildren;and‘Wfiereas,Rentonisproudtobehometotrustedcommunity-basedorganizationsthatrecognizetheimportanceofdiapersinensuringhealthandprovidingeconomicstabilityforfamiliesandthusdistributediaperstofamiliesthroughvariouschannels;andW’ñereas,WestSideBabyandEastsideBabyCornerservedonthefrontlinesofRenton’sCOVID-19pandemicresponse,helpingfamiliesinourcommunitiesweatherthecrisis;andWfiereas,wethanktheaforementioneddiaperbanks,theirstaff,volunteersanddonors,fortheircourageousserviceduringthecrisis;Wow,tfierefore,I,ArmondoPavone,MayoroftheCityofRenton,doherebyproclaimSeptember26throughOctober3,2021,tobeDiaperq\feec(LwarenessWeekintheCityofRenton,andIencouragetheRentoncommunitytodonategenerouslytodiaperbanks,diaperdrives,andorganizationsthatcollectanddistributediapers.InwitnesswfiereofIhavehereuntosetmyhandandcausedthesealoftheCityofRentontobeaffixedthis27thdayofSeptember,2021.Ar13ndoPavone,MayorCityoton,WashingtonRentonCityHaIl,7thFloor1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.gov“AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Mayor’s Office Memorandum DATE: September 27, 2021 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council FROM: Armondo Pavone, Mayor Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report • King County Library System will display a Pop-up Story Walk along the walking path at Liberty Park through September. Enjoy each page of Cat’s Colors as you walk around the park. • Information about preventative street maintenance, traffic impact projects, and road closures happening this week can be found at http://rentonwa.gov/traffic. All projects are weather permitting and unless otherwise noted, streets will always remain open. Preventative street maintenance, traffic impact projects, and road closures will be at the following locations: Monday, September 27 through Friday, October 1, 9:00 am to 3:00 pm. Intermittent single lane closure on northbound Logan Avenue N just north of N 8th Street due to utility construction. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 206-282-2373. Lake Washington Loop Trail Project Logan Avenue South and Airport Way: Lane closures continue between now and project completion in early fall. For more information and project updates, please visit the project webpage at https://rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9346818. Ongoing Trail Closure through fall 2021: Ripley Lane North Trail closure just north of the VMAC and the trailhead going north to support the WSDOT I-405 Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes Project. Questions may be directed to Justin Johnson at 425-902-7172. Downtown Utility Improvement Project: The Downtown Utility Improvement Project requires several roadway closures and detours between now and project completion in 2022. For more information on current upcoming road closures and traffic impacts or to sign up for email or text alerts visit the project website at https://rentonwa.gov/duip. Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project: Impacts to traffic will continue throughout this area between South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street. Please visit the project webpage at https://rentonwa.gov/ww for more information. AGENDA ITEM #4. a) September 20, 2021 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF RENTON MINUTES - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, September 20, 2021 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pavone called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Randy Corman, Council President Angelina Benedetti, Council Position No. 2 Valerie O'Halloran, Council Position No. 3 Ryan McIrvin, Council Position No. 4 Kim-Khánh Vǎn, Council Position No. 7 (All councilmembers attended remotely) Councilmembers Absent: Ed Prince, Council Position No. 5 Ruth Pérez, Council Position No. 6 MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS ED PRINCE AND RUTH PÉREZ. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT Armondo Pavone, Mayor Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer Shane Moloney, City Attorney Cheryl Beyer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Jason Seth, City Clerk Judith Subia, Council Liaison Kristi Rowland, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Chip Vincent, Community & Economic Development Administrator Martin Pastucha, Public Works Administrator Kari Roller, Administrative Services Administrator Ellen Bradley-Mak, Human Resources and Risk Management Administrator Ron Straka, Public Works Utility Systems Director Jeff Minisci, Public Works Facilities Director Rob Shuey, Building Official AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 20, 2021 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Amanda Askren, Property & Technical Services Manager Dianne Utecht, Human Services Coordinator April Alexander, Executive Assistant Interim Chief Jon Schuldt, Police Department Administrator Commander Dan Figaro, Police Department (All City staff attended remotely except City Clerk Seth) PROCLAMATION a) GEAR UP Week (Renton School District): A proclamation by Mayor Pavone was read declaring September 20 - 24, 2021 to be GEAR UP Week in the City of Renton, and encouraging all citizens to join in this special observance. Kirsten Thornton, GEAR UP District Coordinator, Renton School District, clarified that the program is now for 9th and 10th grade students, and accepted the proclamation with appreciation. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING a) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Coronavirus (CV) Round 2 Funds: This being the date set, and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Pavone opened the public hearing to consider proposed use of CDBG – CV (Coronavirus) Round 2 funding. Dianne Utecht, Human Services Coordinator, reported that this public hearing is to consider the allocation of $186,591 in CDBG CV 2 commerce funds. She stated that staff is proposing to allocate $91,429 to Centro Rendu and $91,430 to the Renton Housing Authority for rental assistance, noting that approximately $3,500 will be set aside for administrative costs. She also reported that the funds must be used to prevent, prepare for, or respond to the coronavirus pandemic and have to be spent by June 30, 2024. Continuing, Ms. Utecht reported that King County applied for the funds late, which gave Renton only ten business days to identify activities and agencies that were acceptable under the funding requirements or forfeit the funds. Due to the short timeframe, the City decided to review agencies that had provided these services before with different funding sources and that had managed to provide services to a large group of diverse people. She reported that the Renton Housing Authority provided services to approximately 70% persons of color and Centro Rendu serviced 100% Latinx clients. Ms. Utecht stated the purpose of selecting these two agencies was to get the funding out to the populations most effected by COVID-19 as rapidly as possible. Concluding, she reported that no action is required at this time as a committee report will be presented at the next Council meeting. Responding to Councilmember Vǎn’s questions, Ms. Utecht reiterated that the staff reviewed all of the organizations that were provided CARES Act funding and selected Centro Rendu and the Renton Housing Authority because they could meet these three criteria: 1) They had to be able to meet the grant reporting criteria, 2) They had to have sufficient funding because these are reimbursable grants, and 3) and they had to meet all of the other grant requirements. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 20, 2021 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Council President Corman called for public comment. There being no public comment or correspondence, it was MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT CAO Ed VanValey reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City’s recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2021 and beyond. Items noted were: • On Monday, September 27, Renton Community Center and Senior Activity Center will re-open. Public safety and adequate staffing levels to best serve the public have been considered in the re-opening decision. To ensure safety for both patrons and staff, the following procedures will be followed: o When entering a City of Renton Recreation facility: o Wear a mask at all times regardless of vaccination status. o Complete a COVID-19 Health Screening questionnaire. o Inform the facility’s Safety Supervisor immediately upon receipt of a positive COVID-19 test, if in the facility within the last few days. o During this time, facilities will require pre-registration or reservations for amenities and programs. Schedules can be viewed at rentonwa.gov/recreation. A City of Renton PerfectMind Account is needed to complete the process for all registrations or reservations. If you don’t already have an account, sign up at o rentonwa.gov/register or contact Recreation staff at (425) 430-6700. • Due to declining daylight, Renton Farmers Market will shift back one hour, opening at 2:00pm and closing at 6:00pm on Tuesdays, September 21 and September 28. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and matching dollars are available. See the Renton Farmers Market web page for more information. • Preventative street maintenance will continue to impact traffic and result in occasional street closures. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the Consent Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of September 13, 2021. Council Concur. b) AB - 2932 City Clerk submitted King County's Certification Letter for the August 2, 2021 Primary Election. The results are as follows: Council Position No. 1: James Alberson: 7,501 votes, 51.68% - NOMINATED; Joe Todd: 4,757 votes, 32.77% - NOMINATED; Sanjeev Yonzon: 2,182 votes, 15.03%; Write-in 75 votes, 0.52%; Council Position No. 2: Carmen Rivera: 5,529 votes, 37.92% - NOMINATED; Ben Johnson: 3,338 votes, 22.89% - NOMINATED; Angelina Benedetti: 2,976 votes, 20.41%; Marvin Rosete: 1,613 votes, 11.06%; Caleb L. Sutton: 1,082 votes, 7.42%; Write-in: 44 votes, 0.30%. None; Information Only. c) AB - 2950 Finance Department recommended hiring a Grants Program Manager at Step E of salary grade m27, effective October 18, 2021. Refer to Finance Committee. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 20, 2021 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES d) AB - 2926 Public Works Utility Systems Division recommended approval of Amendment No. 6 to CAG-17-050, with RH2 Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $520,826 for additional professional services for the Lift Station and Force Main Rehabilitation project. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Committee of the Whole Chair Corman presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding of $3,600,000 for the following programs/projects: WA Flex Fund, business grants, support for housing, homelessness prevention and human services; and hardware/software to support remote work. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. b) Utilities Committee Chair Benedetti presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to CAG-21-011 with Murraysmith, Inc. in the amount of $177,686 for construction management services for the Downtown Utility Improvement Project. MOVED BY BENEDETTI, SECONDED BY O'HALLORAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. c) Transportation Committee Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve Amendment No. 1-21 to LAG-19-001 with Rainier Flight Services, LLC and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the amendment. The amendment increases the annual lease revenue by $22,577.40 MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. c) Transportation Committee Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the compensation at $0.00 for the Solera Street Vacation Petition. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance to vacate a portion of 11th Avenue N within the Solera development project be presented for first reading. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. d) Transportation Committee Chair McIrvin presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to authorize the temporary full street closure of Sunset Lane NE (aka Jefferson Ave NE) for 850 foot portion between NE 10th St and Harrington Pl NE not to exceed two (2) years between October 4, 2021 and October 4, 2021 to allow for construction of the Solera Master Site Plan Project (former Hi-Lands Shopping Center). The Committee further recommended the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 20, 2021 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES LEGISLATION Resolution: a) Resolution No. 4446: A resolution was read authorizing temporary full road closure of Sunset Lane NE (aka Jefferson Ave NE) between NE 10th St and Harrington Pl NE for the construction of the Solera Master Site Plan Project (former Hi-Lands Shopping Center) for a period not to exceed 2 (two) calendar years. MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Ordinance for first reading: b) Ordinance No. 6027: An ordinance was read vacating a portion of 11th Avenue N, south of Harrington Place NE and north of Sunset Lane NE (Solera Street Vacation; VAC-20-002). MOVED BY MCIRVIN, SECONDED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. CARRIED. Ordinance for second and final reading: c) Ordinance No. 6026: An ordinance was read adopting final zoning regulations, previously adopted as interim zoning controls by Ordinance No. 5996 and Ordinance No. 6019 with changes to expand the number of zones in which homeless services may locate and otherwise align with requirements of ESSHB 1220, providing for severability, and establishing an effective date. MOVED BY O'HALLORAN, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar. EXECUTIVE SESSION & ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION PURSUANT TO RCW 42.30.110(1(i) FOR APPROXIMATELY 60 MINUTES, WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. TIME: 7:32 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS CONDUCTED AND NO ACTION WAS TAKEN. THE COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ADJOURNED. TIME: 8:32 P.M. Jason A. Seth, MMC, City Clerk Jason Seth, Recorder 20 Sep 2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar September 20, 2021 September 27, 2021 Monday 4:00 PM Finance Committee, Chair O’Halloran – VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. Authorization to Purchase Equipment for the Safe Routes to Transit Program 2. Change Order No. 12 to CAG-20-001 with Cascade Civil Construction, LLC for the Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project 3. 2021 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) / 21EMPG-ARPA Award Obligation Letter 4. Authorization to Hire Associate Planner at Step E 5. Authorization to Hire Civil Engineer III at Step D 6. Authorization to Hire Grants Program Manager at Step E 7. Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) Round 2 Funds 8. Vouchers 9. Emerging Issues in Finance 5:00 PM Planning & Development Committee, Chair Prince – VIDEOCONFERENCE 1. King County Regional Homelessness Authority Briefing* 2. Update to Clean Economy Strategy with Cascadia Consulting Group 3. Rainier/Grady Junction Subarea Plan Update 4. Termination of the 2019 Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement for Sunset Terrace Apartments 5. Housing Action Plan Update 6. Emerging Issues in CED CANCELED Committee of the Whole, Chair Corman 7:00 PM Council Meeting - VIDEOCONFERENCE * updated 09/23/2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. a) AB - 2945 City Council Regular Meeting - 27 Sep 2021 SUBJECT/TITLE: Adoption of School Impact Fees RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Paul Hintz, Senior Planner EXT.: 7436 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: School impact fees are collected by the City and remitted to the appropriate school district on a quarterly basis. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all school impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Should the City of Renton update school impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts? Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed on newly built household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing or building new school facilities. The Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts have each adopted their updated Capital Facilities Plan and requested the City of Renton collect revised impact fees for 2021, which are based on the need to complete projects that increase the capacity of school facilities to accommodate student body growth. The requested 2021 fees are shown below along with the currently applied 2020 fees. Renton 2020 2021 Change Single- Family $7,681 $2,659 $(5,022) Multi- Family $4,989 $4,737 $(252) Kent 2020 2021 Change Single- Family $5,692.85 $5,818.09 $125.24 Multi- Family $2,404.63 $2,457.53 $52.90 Issaquah 2020 2021 Change Single- Family $18,213 $20,291 $2,078 Multi- Family $12,043 $8,353 $(3,690) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper - School Impact Fees B. Kent 2020/2021 Capital Facilities Plan C. Renton 2021 Capital Facilities Plan D. Issaquah 2021 Capital Facilities Plan E. Resolution STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and approve the collection of the requested impact fees. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:September 13, 2021 TO:Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA:Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM:Chip Vincent, Community and Economic Development Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Paul Hintz, Senior Planner SUBJECT:Adoption of School Impact Fees ISSUE: Should the City of Renton update school impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the updating of School Impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts. BACKGROUND: Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed on newly built household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing or building new school facilities. The Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts have each adopted their updated Capital Facilities Plan and requested the City of Renton collect revised impact fees for 2021, which are based on the need to complete projects that increase the capacity of Renton 2020 2021 Change Single-Family $7,681 $2,659 $(5,022) Multi-Family $4,989 $4,737 $(252) Kent 2020 2021 Change Single-Family $5,692.85 $5,818.09 $125.24 Multi-Family $2,404.63 $2,457.53 $52.90 Issaquah 2020 2021 Change Single-Family $18,213 $20,291 $2,078 Multi-Family $12,043 $8,353 $(3,690) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Randy Corman, Council President Page 2 of 2 September 13, 2021 school facilities to accommodate student body growth. The requested 2021 fees are shown below along with the currently applied 2020 fees. Fiscal Note School impact fees are collected by the City and remitted to the appropriate school district on a quarterly basis. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all school impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. Staff Recommendation Adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and approve the collection of the requested impact fees. Cc: Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer Kari Roller, ASD Administrator Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director Raevel Chea, Senior Finance Analyst AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2021 through 2026-2027 June 2021 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Denise Daniels, President Ms. Michele Bettinger, Vice President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative Ms. Leslie Hamada, Director Mr. Joe Bento, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 7 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 8 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ................................................................ 9 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 10 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 11 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 12 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 14 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 15 12 2 22 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2021 for the 2021-2022 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity 23 3 33 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the district’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan). 34 4 44 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick’s study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Fall of 2020. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 6.88% of 26,011 King County live births in 2016 is projected for 1,789 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2021. This is an increase of 524 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2021 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the “medium growth” methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 45 5 55 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .277 Middle School .071 Senior High .086 Total .435 Multi-Family Elementary .258 Middle School .058 Senior High .100 Total .416 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,399 single-family dwelling units and 1,020 multi- family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. In preparing the 2021-2022 to 2026-2027 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Dr. Les Kendrick of Educational Data Solutions LLC, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. EDC included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2021. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. 56 6 66 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 October HC Enrollment 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 1 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 Increase / Decrease 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 139 Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93%6.68% Kindergarten 2,134 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 Grade 1 2,017 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 Grade 2 1,905 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 Grade 3 2,082 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 Grade 4 2,000 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 Grade 5 2,044 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 Grade 6 2,026 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 Grade 7 Middle School 2,139 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 Grade 8 " "2,139 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 Grade 9 Senior High 2,455 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 Grade 10 " "2,092 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 Grade 11 " "1,933 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 Grade 12 " "1,646 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 Total Enrollment 2 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 -1,331 Cumulative Increase -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 -2,249 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools For 2021 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2021 67 7 77 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 King County Live Births 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,849 23,611 Increase / Decrease 139 524 -737 -937 -1,184 -1,425 -726 Kindergarten / Birth % 6.68%6.88%6.88%6.94%6.80%6.65%6.51% FD Kindergarten 1,703 1,789 1,739 1,688 1,637 1,587 1,536 Grade 1 1,882 1,787 1,945 1,950 1,951 1,944 1,937 Grade 2 1,980 1,968 1,845 2,000 2,002 1,998 1,992 Grade 3 2,001 2,052 2,014 1,880 2,035 2,033 2,027 Grade 4 1,912 2,083 2,110 2,062 1,922 2,076 2,074 Grade 5 1,937 1,979 2,130 2,148 2,097 1,949 2,105 Grade 6 2,024 2,013 2,032 2,177 2,193 2,135 1,985 Grade 7 Middle School 2,010 2,060 2,024 2,033 2,176 2,188 2,130 Grade 8 " "2,086 2,105 2,130 2,085 2,091 2,233 2,245 Grade 9 Senior High 2,006 2,163 2,157 2,173 2,125 2,126 2,270 Grade 10 " "1,813 2,078 2,213 2,197 2,210 2,157 2,157 Grade 11 " "1,744 1,625 1,841 1,951 1,934 1,942 1,894 Grade 12 " "1,484 1,707 1,571 1,772 1,877 1,855 1,863 Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Yearly Increase/Decrease -1,331 828 341 366 133 -26 -9 Yearly Increase/Decrease %-5.14%3.37%1.34%1.42%0.51%-0.10%-0.03% Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Live births for King County are estimates for year 2021 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 2020 - 2026 Enrollment Projections PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2021 78 8 88 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) III- Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. 89 9 99 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. 910 10 1010 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 1011 11 1111 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 28,564 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2020. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: The 2021-2022 school year will have two academy programs within the district housed at our new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent Board of Directors in 2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project “20 Classrooms”. The new facility has 24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related programs. The previous facility of these two programs (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the voter approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and will be available for additional capacity for our District at the secondary level. iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. 1112 12 1212 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2021 - 2022 SCHOOL Year Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 758 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,813 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KLA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 456 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 850 DISTRICT TOTAL 28,564 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 May 20211213 13 1313 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1314 14 1414 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1415 15 1515 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1516 16 1616 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy – River Ridge Elementary), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School (The Laboratory Academy). At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2021, the following projects to increase capacity will be a part of our student capacity in the Kent School District. • `Construction is more than 80% completed for the New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6 school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. It will open for the 2021-2022 school year. • Construction is more than 95% complete for our new Kent Laboratory Academy at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoia Junior High) for additional classroom space if needed and/or to open another middle school soon. The new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School District. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). 1617 17 1717 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property over the last school year. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. 1718 18 1818 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY 6 New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary Addition Under Construction 2021-2022 758 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH 3 New Academy Site (Kent Laboratory Academy)Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy Under Construction 2021-2022 456 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2020+24 - 31 each 100% # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 1 164th SE (Across from Mattson)25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042 Rural TBD 2 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 10 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. King County King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2021 1819 19 1919 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Kent Laboratory Academy Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kentwood High School Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Sawyer Woods Elementary Kentlake High School River Ridge Elementary Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School 1920 20 2020 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) I - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 2021 21 2121 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2020 was 24,587 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2020, there were an additional 1,102 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 686 attended classes only at the college (“college- only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth and additional programs within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization as well as possible overcrowding of facilities in different parts of the District. 2122 22 2222 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28564 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interim Portable Capacity Total 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,503 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 24,582 24,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 3,921 4,154 2,813 2,447 2,314 2,340 2,349 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2021 2223 23 2323 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 New Elementary School - Kent Valley 758 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 Portable Capacity Required 1 1248 456 336 336 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,248 14,214 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,439 13,671 13,815 13,905 13,837 13,723 13,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 809 543 279 189 257 371 437 Number of Portables Required 52 19 14 14 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2021 2324 24 2424 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-2027 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,096 4,164 4,154 4,118 4,267 4,421 4,374 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,052 984 994 1,030 881 727 774 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2021 2425 25 2525 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Changes to High School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,047 7,574 7,782 8,094 8,146 8,080 8,184 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,250 723 515 203 151 217 113 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2021 2526 26 2626 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2021-2022 through 2026-2027. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. With River Ridge Elementary School (New Valley School Project) and Kent Laboratory Academy (New Academy Project) coming on-line for school year 2021-2022, this will help support the capacity issue that has been an issue for our district. The building rate within the City of Kent and surrounding areas within our boundary continue to be robust. The district is likely to see growth in enrollment due to these conditions. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both the New Valley and Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Impact fees will be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of temporary instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. 2627 27 2727 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) The Kent School District 2021 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent Laboratory Academy, we are advancing opportunity to add capacity for our programs and student-based needs. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an initial plan (Fall 2021) as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) – which will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would follow soon after approval. Portable purchases may be required before the Bond Measure passes as it takes approximately three years from design to open for most large-scale projects such as schools or added permanent capacity. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include detail of any adopted planning. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School Kent Valley (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – River Ridge Elementary $55,000,000 New Academy Facility (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – Kent Laboratory Academy $36,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the decrease in the 2022 CY Consumer Price Index (2.2%) for the Seattle metropolitan area (Previously 2.5% for the 2021 CY). 2728 28 2828 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2021 2829 29 2929 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel , #362206-9081 2021 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 0,000,000 $0 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 5 lots purchased Military Road South SeaTac WA 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 68.95 $6,917,588 $100,328 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2010 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 68.95 $6,917,588 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson)2000 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $100,328 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2021 2930 30 3030 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6)0.277 Elementary 0.258 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.071 Middle School 0.058 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.086 Senior High 0.100 Total 0.435 Total 0.416 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 758 Elementary 115 Middle School 0 Middle School 148 Senior High (Academy)456 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required)25 Elementary $100,328 Senior High (required)38 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary *$55,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $0 Senior High * (Academy)$36,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 125,204 District Funding Assistance Percentage 53.79% Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.3%156,756 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $238.22 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,621,688 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,223,349 Single Family Residence $268,271 Total 95.7%3,505,941 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,746,892 Multi-Family Residence $226,726 Middle School 671,160 Senior High/Other 1,244,645 Total 3,662,697 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 1.41 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0014 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% CPI Inflation Factor 2.20% Per OSPI Website Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)May 2021 3031 31 3131 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.27734 $440.50 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.07076 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.08649 $0.00 Total 75 $100,328 1,214 0.435A $440.50 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.27734 0.903 $18,171.62 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.07076 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.08649 0.998 $6,814.50 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.435 B $24,986.13 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.27734 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.07076 0.016 $0.00 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.08649 0.02 $0.00 Total $0 84 0.435 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.27734 $4,086.86 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.07076 $1,342 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.08649 $1,917D $7,346.10 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$268,271 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $3,366.53 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $440.50 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $24,986.13 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 Subtotal $25,426.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,346.10 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,366.53 Subtotal $10,712.63 Total Unfunded Need $14,713.99 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,357 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment (1538.90) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,818.09 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)June 2020 3132 32 3232 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.25784 $409.53 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.05784 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.100 $0.00 Total $75 100,328 1,214 0.416A $409.53 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.25784 0.903 $16,893.96 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.05784 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.100 0.998 $7,878.95 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.416 B $24,772.91 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.25784 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.05784 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.100 0.02 $0 Total $0 84 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.25784 $3,799.51 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.05784 $1,097 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.1 $2,217D $7,113.22 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$226,726 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $2,845.18 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $409.53 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $24,772.91 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 Subtotal $25,182.44 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $7,113.22 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,845.18 Subtotal -$9,958.40 Total Unfunded Need $15,224.04 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,612 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment ($5,154) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,457.53 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)June 2020 3233 33 3333 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2020 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor Educational Data Solutions, LLC out of Seattle Washington to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2022 calendar year will change based on the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2022 calendar year is 2.2% (Based on the OSPI Applied to LEA & Levy per pupil inflators CPI as of March 2021). For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $125.24 to $5818.06. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $52.90 to $2,457.53. 3334 34 3434 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) ITEM Grade/ Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.334 0.277 Single Family (SF)MS 0.078 0.071 SH 0.117 0.086 Total 0.529 0.435 -0.094 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.187 0.258 Multi-Family (MF)MS 0.043 0.058 SH 0.070 0.100 Total 0.300 0.416 0.116 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96%53.79%-3.17%Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $238.22 12.250 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV)SF $423,247 $268,271 (154,976)Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.MF $164,546 $226,726 62,180 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.41 $1.41 0.0 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.16%2.44%0.28%Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,692.85 $5,818.09 $125.24 2.20% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,403.63 $2,457.53 $53.90 2.20% X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: 3435 35 3535 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Alisa Louie, President Gloria Hodge, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D Shelby Scovel Dr. Damien Pattenaude, Superintendent July 2021 – adopted July 14, 2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 2021 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS V. GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN VII. IMPACT FEES VIII. APPENDICES AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) was prepared by Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. It is the District’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City’s Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the District’s student population over the next six years; 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those students based on the District’s current Standard of Service; 3. the need for additional enrollment or growth driven capital facilities; 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District continues to dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 Overview of the Renton School District: The District is located on the south end of Lake Washington, 11 miles south of Seattle to the west and south of Bellevue to the east. Home to nearly 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The District spans approximately 32 square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 15,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at 4 high schools, 4 middle schools, 15 elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Four schools (Renton Park Elementary, Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2019 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of all middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of a new elementary school (Sartori) and middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology - a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Creating life-long learners is at the heart of Renton School District's instructional goals. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on basic academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Each year, Renton School District students qualify as National Merit Finalists while the total value of college scholarships earned is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Elementary level students are well-grounded in science through participation in the Hands-on Science Kit Program, lauded by the National Science Teachers' Association. At the high school level, the district's challenging chemistry program, which provides options for advanced placement college credit, has been recognized by the National Science Association, as well as the National Science Foundation. The focus in math is on intensive instruction in the basic skills, supplemented by opportunities to apply developing knowledge to real world problems. The K-12 math program increases student achievement through problem solving, integration of technology, and a rigorous assessment component. Students from elementary to high school levels regularly excel in regional and national mathematics contests. Across all levels and subjects, reading with accuracy and understanding is a primary goal. Elementary students receive a rich exposure to fine literature. Middle and high school students work extensively on reading in the content areas and exploring classic and modern literature works. Reading activities are integrated with a topnotch writing program beginning in kindergarten that provides students with intensive and focused practice for the mastery of a wide range of language arts skills from creative to business and technical writing. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 A variety of classes, clubs, and programs give students opportunities to expand their educational horizons and pursue special interests. Choices range from instrumental and music, performing and visual arts, intramurals and athletics, academic-focused and career clubs, and community service opportunities to leadership development programs, business internships, job shadowing, and participation in the annual robotics competition. Special needs students with physical, emotional, and academic disabilities receive individualized attention from skilled teachers. Special education and remedial support are also available and children who are just learning English receive intensive, small-group ESL instruction to supplement their regular classroom learning. Guidance and counseling services are available for primary, middle, and high school students. Intellectually gifted children have many opportunities for extended learning. Operating at two magnet elementary schools and the three middle schools, the Discovery Program offers a challenging curriculum with a special focus on higher level thinking skills. High school students can take advantage of a full range of honors and advanced placement classes. Renton School District staff consistently show a commitment to their most important task - preparing their students for success in work and life. More than 80 percent of certificated staff have five or more years of higher education and two of every three teachers have advanced degrees in their fields. Several of the district's certificated and classified staff have received the Washington Award for Educational Excellence. Individual teachers have received special honors such as the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Education, the Outstanding Secondary Science Award, the Washington State High School Social Studies Teacher of the Year Award, and Outstanding College Alumni recognition. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through creating and refining curriculum, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. Hundreds of training opportunities are offered to teachers and other staff members each year, ranging from CPR and first aid, technology education, diversity, and crisis intervention to math, science, and reading instruction strategies, assessment techniques, and arts education. II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS Over the past six years, District enrollment has dropped by 3%, or 340 students. The elementary grade span experienced a loss of 659 students and the high school grade span dropped by 105 students. Middle school however increased by 105 students. Growth in the immigrant population had been a significant factor fueling enrollment gains over the past two decades. However, more recently - between 2016 and 2019 - the ELL (immigrant) population in the District grew only by an annual average of 1.6%. This is much lower than the 5% annual growth AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 rate experienced by the District between 2012 and 2016. This lower growth rate is consistent across South King County and could be an early indicator of slowing growth in this part of King County. The District should continue its observation of the region’s immigrant growth trends in the near term. Recent increases in the price of housing and declining birth rates are also potential reasons for declining enrollment. Additionally, the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused numerous adjustments to school district’s teaching and learning protocols throughout the last half of the 2019-2020 school year and certainly throughout the 2020-2021 school year. Many school districts, including Renton, have experienced notable drops in enrollment in varied grades. There has been much discussion on whether enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels, and that discussion will likely continue over the next couple of years with future CFP’s. The learning model in most cases has been through remote delivery methods and have only recently returned to partial in-person learning. While the District anticipates and is planning for a full return to in- person learning, families will also have an option for a virtual program this fall. The District won’t fully understand the impact of these options until well into the fall, and potentially into the 2022-2023 school year. While overall District enrollment has been trending down in recent years, the district is still responding to existing capacity deficiencies from growth in earlier years. However, there are specific service areas within the District that are experiencing growth and continued pressures on capacity. Elementary schools within the Hazen High School service areas continue to experience over-enrollment and higher student generation rates than other areas within the district. There is more planned community new development in the pipeline in these neighborhoods, putting increased pressure on the nearby elementary schools’ capacity. Single-family student generation rates within Renton trend closer to 40-45 new students per 100 over the past 5 years as compared to district-wide rates of 24 new students per 100. This is evident is the six neighboring elementary schools further discussed in the enrollment analysis in the appendix as well. Out of the 212 new students generated from new single-family development, over half were generated from development within the City of Renton. Another 109 students were generated from multi- family development within the City of Renton. Approval by the community of a 2019 bond measure allowed the District to construct a new elementary school (#16) to accommodate over-enrollment in the K-5 grade span and to provide some elementary capacity relief. Sartori, another new elementary was opened in 2019 as a choice school in the downtown area. This new school has helped with drawing some students from their neighborhood school, but the affect of growth in this service area continue to put pressure on elementary grade-span school capacity. When the pandemic appeared to cause another slight decline in enrollment for the District, the District chose to supplement the 2020 CFP by further evaluating the enrollment and capacity of the elementary schools located within or near the service areas the new elementary school #16 (attached as exhibit). The District also chose to more closely evaluate actual student generation rates within the District, rather than rely on neighboring district averages, as it has in the past, to more closely evaluate enrollment, growth, and new development student growth rates. The conclusion of that analysis reaffirmed the District need for the new elementary school. #16. The new elementary school is scheduled to open in fall of 2023 and is discussed later in this Plan. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid-June. Similarly, the District maintains a common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The District, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 21:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 For the purposes of this report, student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self- contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83% to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of 24 credits; three more than the previously required 21. This will impact high school capacity, especially regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in last year’s update, although it is not addressed in the calculation of this year’s impact fees or previous year’s impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Practical Capacity Model: The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs, operating policy and contractual restrictions. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing students, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five- period day, capacity is reduced by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. Current Capacity: Student capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,788. Based on current enrollment (October 2020 headcount), the District is showing a permanent facility deficit of 162 at the elementary level, further reduced from last year’s deficit of 498 and 755 the year prior. This is deficit reduction is due to the new Elementary School, Sartori, opening in 2019, but could also be due in some manner, to the effects of the pandemic. The current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the District’s current Standard of Service and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of 17 students to one teacher. The District continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recently, the District was at 17.3:1, and continues making successful progress towards the mandate. As a result of increased enrollment at middle schools, the current number of students now exceeds facility capacity by 213, while a decrease in recent high school enrollment results in a surplus capacity of 252, down from last year’s surplus of 349. Elementary school capacity remains the District’s greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools account for over 15% of the District’s total K – 5 facility capacity. Portables are, however, not considered permanent structures, and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary or interim basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 32 permanent and 55 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 14,918 (October 2020 headcount). The District’s permanent K-12 facilities include 15 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and 4 high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District’s early childhood, special education and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet, with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District’s relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the District’s inventory, 44 are “double portables” containing two classrooms, and 11 are singles. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 99 relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. Table 1 below includes all facilities. Table 2 indicates capacities in term of high school Service Areas. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows in Tables 3,4, & 5. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in Appendix B. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Facility Type Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Total Permanent 6,895 84.6% 3,435 88.3% 4,458 98.0% 14,788 89.1% Relocatable 1,252 15.4% 457 11.7% 92 2.0% 1,801 10.9% Total 8,147 100% 3,892 100% 4,550 100% 16,589 100% TABLE 1 CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Facility Type Lindbergh Hazen Renton High Total Elementary Permanent 1843 2423 2075 6341 Relocatable 183 618 451 1252 Total Elem 2026 3041 2526 7593 Middle Permanent 896 1745 794 3435 Relocatable 183 183 91 457 Total Elem 1079 1928 885 3892 High Permanent 1211 1462 1389 4062 Relocatable 92 0 0 92 Total Elem 1303 1462 1389 4154 Grand Total 4408 6431 4800 15639 TABLE 2 1. Does not include Sartori Elementary and Talley High, as they are not associated with a particular service area. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of Classrooms School ID Numbers Area (sq. ft.) Student Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 Total 99 88,704 2,669 TABLE 3 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 TABLE 4 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA (ft2)CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 Maplewood Hgts.130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Srenton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 901,400 6,895 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 Risdon 6928 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 136,582 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,435 Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 Total Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,317,253 14,788 Meadow Crest EEC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,005 84 Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,837 48 Total Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,417,847 15,384 Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 57,000 Lindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 13,600 Nutrition Services / Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 37,213 Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 20,243 Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,595,263ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSALT LEARNINGSUPPORT SERVICESMIDDLE SCHOOLSHIGH SCHOOLSAGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 69. 80. 90. 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 84, 103, 104, 105, 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 62, 64, 70, 113, 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92, 108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 93, 94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 88,704 2669 TABLE 5 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres Chelan Ave. Site Chelan Ave. NE & NE 12th St., Renton 10.80 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 3rd St., Renton 0.31 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 5th Ave., Renton 0.45 Acres IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Projection Methodology Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to account for the average year-to- year growth. For example, this year’s fourth grade is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustment factor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming that there is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollment to births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollment in 2019 is divided by the total births in King County in 2014 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequent years to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The cohort survival method has been used by OSPI to predict enrollment for all Districts in the state. In past years, OSPI has used a 6-year cohort average for grades 1-12 and a linear extrapolation method at kindergarten. In 2008, OSPI commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for predicting enrollment. The report recommended the use of the “birth-to-k” method for predicting kindergarten enrollment and the use of a housing adjustment factor for Districts that are likely to be impacted by large numbers of new housing developments. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment. It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one year to the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can sometimes provide for a more accurate forecast. For this Plan, the average rollup at existing grades was combined with estimates of growth that might be expected from new housing, and assumptions about market share gains or losses that the District is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. Overall enrollment is predicted to increase between 2021 and 2026. Elementary and High School enrollment are projected to grow by about 1% over the six-year forecasted period, while the middle school is projected to lose about 1% enrollment over this same period. Projections and Future Capacity: Enrollment projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC indicate some growth in the elementary and high school grade span over the next six years, with a minor decrease in middle school enrollment. Overall enrollment is projected to grow by 497 students, or 15,415 students - returning enrollment to pre-pandemic levels. The elementary grade span is projected to increase by 373 students, middle school is projected to drop enrollment by 171 students and the high school grade span projects a growth of 303 students. While this enrollment projection begins to return the District to pre-pandemic levels, it still reflects a less than 0.5% annual growth, which is relatively consistent with actual enrollment growth over the past decade. For the purposes of this Plan, the District is using a ‘medium’ enrollment projection but will continue to monitor both a ‘low’ and a ‘high’ enrollment projection as well. As the District moves past the pandemic and related impacts, there is potential for development growth in the real estate market and for a resurgence of immigrant population with recent political administration changes at the national level. Acknowledging the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in 2018 and factoring in the projections in elementary school enrollment over the next six years, current capacity will still be insufficient to accommodate all K-5 students. With the passage of the 2019 RSD bond measure, the District is moving forward with design and construction of an additional elementary school, which, upon completion, will allow permanent capacity to surpass enrollment for the first time in nearly two decades. The District’s sixteenth elementary school is scheduled to open in the fall of 2023. Middle schools are currently showing a deficit capacity of 213. Projections show a slight drop in enrollment over the next six years and there are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity. At the high school level, projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 303 students. With a current surplus capacity of 252, this enrollment increase will result in a deficit of 84 by the school year 2023 – 2024. That deficit will be mitigated by the construction of new science classrooms, and the renovation of existing science classrooms, at Lindbergh High School, increasing capacity by 84. This increase, however, will still result in a deficit of 47 by the school year 2025 – 2026. There are no additional plans currently to increase high school capacity. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 TABLE 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL* (KK Linear Projection) - - ACTUAL HEADCOUNT - - AVE. % - - - - - - PROJECTED ENROLLMENT - - - - - - Oct. 2019 Oct. 2020 SURVIVAL 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Kindergarten 1,263 1,095 1,296 1,297 1,231 1,230 1,221 1,247 Grade 1 1,248 1,214 100.91% 1,256 1,295 1,290 1,218 1,230 1,212 Grade 2 1,207 1,215 97.94% 1,181 1,251 1,289 1,284 1,212 1,220 Grade 3 1,225 1,142 98.37% 1,166 1,180 1,250 1,289 1,284 1,209 Grade 4 1,256 1,186 98.34% 1,143 1,158 1,172 1,241 1,279 1,270 Grade 5 1,286 1,205 98.48% 1,173 1,139 1,154 1,168 1,237 1,271 TOTAL K - 5 7,485 7,057 7,215 7,320 7,386 7,430 7,463 7,429 Grade 6 1,246 1,234 96.39% 1,152 1,143 1,110 1,124 1,138 1,202 Grade 7 1,175 1,251 99.51% 1,201 1,160 1,151 1,118 1,132 1,143 Grade 8 1,125 1,163 99.14% 1,200 1,205 1,163 1,154 1,121 1,132 TOTAL 6 - 8 3,546 3,648 3,553 3,508 3,424 3,396 3,391 3,477 Grade 9 1,118 1,123 101.12% 1,158 1,215 1,222 1,180 1,169 1,137 Grade 10 1,133 1,110 101.36% 1,140 1,183 1,228 1,236 1,193 1,183 Grade 11 960 992 90.76% 1,037 1,057 1,099 1,141 1,152 1,108 Grade 12 931 981 101.26% 965 972 993 1,032 1,075 1,081 TOTAL 9 - 12 4,142 4,206 4,300 4,427 4,542 4,589 4,589 4,509 TOTAL K - 12 15,173 14,911 15,068 15,255 15,352 15,415 15,443 15,415 YEARLY CHANGE 157 187 97 63 28 -28 YEARLY CHANGE % 1.05% 1.24% 0.64% 0.41% 0.18% - 0.18% CUMULATIVE CHANGE 157 344 441 504 532 504 CUMULATIVE CHANGE % 1.05% 2.31% 2.96% 3.38% 3.57% 3.38% TABLE 7 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH ACTUAL OCT. 2019 HEADCOUNT ACTUAL 0CT. 2020 HEADCOUNT OCT. 2026 PROJECTED HEADCOUNT ACTUAL CHANGE 2019 - 2020 ACTUAL CHANGE (%) 2019 - 2020 PROJECTED CHANGE 2020 - 2026 PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2020 - 2026 ELEMENTARY 7,485 7,057 7,429 (428)-5.72%372 5.27% MIDDLE 3,546 3,648 3,477 102 2.88%-171 -4.69% HIGH 4,142 4,206 4,509 64 1.55%303 7.20% TOTAL 15,173 14,911 15,415 (262)-1.73%504 3.38% AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40% to 755. Currently, as a result of recent enrollment declines, that deficit has been further reduced to 498. However, even with the K-5 enrollment decreases projected through the 2025 -26 school year, existing facilities will still be inadequate to house all K-5 students. Aside from these growth-related deficits, the future implementation of reduced K-3 student/teacher ratios, as prescribed by the McCleary Act, will further necessitate the need for additional elementary school capacity. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November, 2019, the District is proceeding with the design and construction of its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the District has experienced the most growth in the past. The new school is scheduled to be completed and opened for the 2023-24 school year. To get a better understanding of enrollment driven facility needs at the K-5 level, it is helpful to view existing conditions in terms of high school Service Areas, the vast majority of the District’s elementary facility deficit has occurred within the Hazen High School Service Area, representing approximately 95% of the total shortfall. Although growth in this area has slowed down over the past decade, it has not recovered from the construction boom of the early 2000’s. The need for additional permanent facilities in the Hazen Service Area, to replace the multitude of relocatable facilities that have overtaken student play areas, has been a District goal for several years. With the passage of the 2019 Bond, the District is now able to proceed with construction of a new elementary school, bringing equity, in the way of permanent classroom facilities, to the East Hill of Renton. At the middle school level, enrollment projections indicate that, due to decreased enrollment, the current deficit of 39 unhoused students will become a surplus of 106 by the 2025-26 school year. There are currently no enrollment driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. At the high school level, the District continues showing a decreasing surplus capacity until 2023, when enrollment overtakes capacity, resulting in a deficit of 84. The deficit returns to a slight surplus by 2026. Although the need for additional facilities based on enrollment growth is not a priority at this time, recent changes in graduation requirements have created the need for additional science classrooms and laboratories. Changed requirements include an increase from 21 to 24 credits, and one addition credit of Science. As part of the recently passed 2019 Bond Measure, the District will be constructing additional science classrooms at Lindbergh High School and renovating/upgrading existing science classrooms at all three comprehensive high schools. In addition to these current and/or future projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 providing portable classrooms at its existing sites, due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of Impact Fees, the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Table 8 compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS1 2019 - 2025 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ELEM. K-5 PERMANENT CAPACITY 6,895 6,895 6,895 6,895 7,545 7,545 7,545 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 7,393 7,288 7,221 7,198 7,187 7,153 7,085 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) (498) (393) (326) (303) 358 392 460 MIDDLE 6-8 PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,484 3,584 3,599 3,495 3,376 3,314 3,329 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) (49) (149) (164) (60) 59 121 106 HIGH 9-12 PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,542 4,542 4,542 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 4,109 4,224 4,336 4,457 4,562 4,608 4,567 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 349 234 122 1 (20) (66) (25) TABLE 8 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 Capital Construction Plan: For the next six-year period, the District’s highest priorities will be addressing existing and projected facility capacity deficits, both growth and program related. This includes: • Construction of a new elementary school within the Hazen High School service area, where most of the growth has and continues to occur, and relief is needed at the elementary grade-span. (see enrollment analysis appendix) • High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements • Acquisition of land for future development. • Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space known as portables) Other high priority capital improvements will fall into one or more of the following major categories; Safety and Security, Energy Conservation, Site Improvements, and Building Upgrades. Improvements will occur district-wide, affecting nearly all District facilities, achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy, and nurturing learning environments for all students. These improvements are not necessarily enrollment related. Many of these projects will be funded by the 2019 Bond Measure passed in November 2019. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2019 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2016 capital levy; and school impact fees currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. Expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the next six years are estimated at $77,362,000, of which 100% is secured by the 2019 Bond Measure approved by the voters in November 2019, and previously collected impact fees. Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, resulting in a decrease of $5,022 per unit for single-family fees, and a decrease in multi-family fees of $252 per unit. The primary variables contributing to these decreases are due to a notable decrease in the Student Generation Factors for single-family residential construction, as well as the continued low Bond rates. A comparison of current and last year’s fees is shown below. IMPACT FEES 2019 2020 CHANGE SINGLE- FAMILY $6,862 $7,681 $819 MULTI-FAMILY $3,582 $4,989 $1,407 TABLE 1 Enrollment driven capital improvements projects identified in this Plan will be funded by the 2019 Capital Bond funds, and school impact fees assessed and collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District does not appear to be eligible for any funding through the OSPI School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) at this point in time, based on the construction projects included in this update. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement programs is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period in order to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the Districts total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated in Table 10 below. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN - GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS Project Estimated Expenditures1 ($1,000's) Funding ($1,000s) 2020- 21 2021- 22 2022- 23 2023- 24 2024- 25 2025- 26 Total Secured2 Unsecured3 New Elem. School 1,120 16,800 30,880 10,080 1,120 60,000 60,000 Science Classrooms & Portables (if needed) 817 2,088 4,406 9,423 766 17,500 17,500 Land Acquisition 2,431 2,431 4,862 4,862 Total 1,937 18,888 37,717 21,934 1,886 0 82,362 82,362 TABLE 10 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies, and school impact fees. 3. Unsecured funds include future levy and bond initiatives. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 VII. IMPACT FEES The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by enrollment growth from new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King County Code 21A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish “Student Generation Factors” that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi-family residential unit constructed and establish district-specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix D for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit – Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates. Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A, impact fees for the plan year 2021 are: Single-Family Units $ 2,659 Multi-Family Units $ 4,737 Single-Family and Multi-Family Fee Calculation spreadsheet follows. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 10 650,000 650 0.154 $1,540 0.137 $1,370.00 Middle 0 650 850 0.065 $0 0.042 $0.00 High 0 650 1250 0.062 $0 0.060 $0.00 TOTAL $1,540 TOTAL $1,370 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 84.63%48,434,125 650 0.154 $9,712 0.176 $11,123 Middle 88.25%0 850 0.065 $0 $0.077 $0 High 97.97%0 1,250 0.062 $0 $0.078 $0 TOTAL $9,712 TOTAL $11,123 TEMPORARY FACILITY COST SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 15.37%0 29 0.154 $0 0.176 $0 Middle 11.75%0 26 0.065 $0 0.077 $0 High 2.03%0 26 0.062 $0 0.078 $0 TOTAL $0 TOTAL $0 OSPI SCAP SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 238.22 90 0.3133 0.154 ($1,034)0.176 ($1,185) Middle 238.22 117 0.3133 0.065 $0 0.077 $0 High 238.22 130 0.3133 0.062 $0 0.078 $0 TOTAL ($1,034)TOTAL ($1,185) TAX CREDIT (TC) *SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Average Assessed Value (AAV)$509,159 $190,741 Interest Rate for Bonds ( i )2.44%2.44% Term (t = maximum 10 yrs.)10 10 Tax Rate ( r ) 0.001096 0.00109602 TC TOTAL TC TOTAL ($4,899)($1,835) FACILITY CREDIT $0 $0 TOTAL FEE $5,318 $9,473 50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION 2,659 4,737 IMPACT FEE 2,659 4,737 ((1+i)t - 1) i (1 +i)t AAV =Average assessed Value r = Tax Rate i =Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2019 t = Bond Term MULTI-FAMILYFacility CapacityCost per AcreSite Area (Acres) * TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = TABLE 11 Facility Facility SINGLE FAMILY Perm. % of Tot. Facilities Facility Cost (2020 $) Facility Capacity SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Facility Cost Alloc. per Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. per Student Assistance Percentage SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Facility Perm. % of Tot. Facilities Facility Cost (2019 $) Facility Capacity SINGLE FAMILY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 XIII. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25 APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 APPENDIX D: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 29 APPENDIX E: CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 31 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 430 109 52 50 63 32 116 6,895 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,147 TABLE 11 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B Permanent Teaching Stations LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 Relocatable Classrooms LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 Permanent Teaching Stations HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TOTAL 110 27 16 14 12 8 25 1,832 Relocatable Classrooms HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B Permanent Teaching Stations RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 Relocatable Classrooms RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 MCKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 TOTAL 181 92 12 5 4 17 23 28 3,435 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap DIMMIT 4 4 0 0 91 885 MCKNIGHT 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 20 20 0 0 457 3,892 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 Talley) PE 40:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 Talley) Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 LINDBERGH 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 TALLEY 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 TOTAL 225 123 10 4 3 21 51 13 4,458 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap HAZEN 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGH 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” In years past, the District has opted to use averaging data from nearby districts, but instead chose to evaluate actual student generation data for this year’s CFP and potentially for future years evaluation, depending upon continued development and enrollment forecasts. It is possible that some enrollment numbers are artificially low due to the pandemic and the lack of in-person schooling, however this will be an area the District will watch closely over the next year. The single- family rate is lower than expected, given knowledge of King County trends. However, there are not a lot of large single-family development projects in the District that would tend to drive a higher student generation. This could also be a reasonable explanation of why enrollment growth has slowed and even declined in recent years. STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Elementary (K-5) Middle School (6-8) High School (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.154 0.065 0.062 0.282 MULTI-FAMILY 0.137 0.042 0.060 0.240 TABLE 13 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E TABLE 14 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) 2019 2020 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 6,895 0 Middle 3,435 3,435 (0) High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 14,788 (0) STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) 2019 2020 CHANGE Elementary 7,650 7,393 (257) Middle 3,391 3,484 93 High 4,213 4,109 (104) Total 15,254 14,986 (268) IMPACT FEES 2019 2020 CHANGE Single-Family 6,862 7,681 819 Multi-Family 3,582 4,989 1,407 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2019 2020 CHANGE Single-Family Elementary 0.321 0.301 (0.020) Middle 0.121 0.129 0.008 High 0.132 0.132 (0.000) Total 0.586 0.561 (0.025) Multi-Family Elementary 0.153 0.176 0.023 Middle 0.068 0.077 0.009 High 0.073 0.078 0.005 Total 0.294 0.331 0.037 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2019 2020 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre 650,000 650,000 0 Temp. Building Acquisition 177,000 177,000 0 State Match Percentage 0.3809 0.3133 -17.75% Ave. Assessed Value - Single 469,537 478,910 9,373 Ave. Assessed Value - Multi 144,672 179,200 34,528 Bond Interest Rate 4.04% 2.44% -39.60% Tax Rate per $1000 1.03306 1.09602 0.06296 Construction Cost Allocation 225.97 238.22 12.25 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1 Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted May 27, 2021 Resolution No. 1165 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE……………………………………………………………………………………. 4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION…………………………………………………………………………….. 5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING………………………………………………………………………………… 5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS…………………………... 6-7 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………… 8 TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2012-13 through 2020-21 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2021-22 through 2035-36………….……………………….… 9 TABLE TW O: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY………………………………………………....10 TABLE THREE: STUDENT GACTORS – MULTI-FAMILY………………………………………………. 11 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES……………………………………………12 SITE LOCATION MAP………………………………………………………………………………………….13 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP………………………………………………………………………. 14 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT’S SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN……………………………………15 TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS……………………………………..15 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS……………………………………………………………………16 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS……………………………….. 17 APPENDIX A……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 APPENDIX C……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20 APPENDIX D……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 21 APPENDIX E……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2021. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, an d other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six- Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 4 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of I nitiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by I -728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation that requires the State to fund Full-Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full-Day Kindergarten beginning in the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, co llective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school could not be used for its long planned purpose. The District sold this planned site to a third party. The District has acquired one high school site, two elementary school sites and one middle school site inside the UGBL. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. Approved Bond funding provides for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 5 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school, a new elementary school, and the expansion of an existing elementary school to meet the needs of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The planned facilities will be funded by a bond passed on April 26, 2016, school impact fees and reserve funds held by the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. Generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing is shown on page 10 and page 11. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 6 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. On April 26, 2016 voters approved bond funding for the construction of a new high school, a new middle school and two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 18) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,280 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 327 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix B, (page 19) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,193 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 128 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix C, (page 20) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,932 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 610 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). Based on the District’s student generation rates, the District expects that 0.791 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.341 students will be generated from each new multi- family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2026-27, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 1,228 students, over permanent capacity at the middle school level by 178 students, and over by 734 students at the high school level. The District’s enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival – historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 7 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) To address existing and future capacity needs, the District’s six-year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Expansions Projected / Final Completion Date Location Additional Capacity New High School #4 New Elementary #17 New Middle School #6 Maple Hills Elementary - Expansion New Elementary #16 2023 2023 2021 2021 2021 Issaquah Issaquah Issaquah King County Sammamish 1600 560 850 120 560 Based upon the District’s capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are necessary to serve students generated by new development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 - .110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District’s recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 8 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., seek to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new dwelling units are converted to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population m atures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A pr ecise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. Enrollment projections for the years 2021-2022 through 2035-2036 are shown in Table One. Student generation factors are shown in Table Two and Table Three. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 9 TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2012-13 through 2020-21 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2021-22 through 2035-36 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 10 TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 11 TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI-FAMILY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 12 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 17,406 students in permanent facilities and 4,290 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the 2021- 2022 school year is expected to be 18,583 including K-5 FTE which leaves a permanent capacity overage of 1,177. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations gives us a capacity of 21,696 with a surplus capacity of 3,113 for the K-12 student population. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah Elementary School #16 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd SE, Sammamish GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish Middle School #6 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Campus 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 13 SITE LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 14 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 15 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table Four is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds for High School #4 project that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K- 12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 18,583 FTE students for the 2021-2022 school year and 19,545 FTE students in the 2026-2027 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth-related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS COMMENTS Years 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2021 data - updated DM 5/12/21 Permanent Capacity 18,322 19,852 19,852 22,012 22,012 22,012 High School 1,600 New ES #16 - 2021-22 SY: 560 Middle School 850 Expansion MH - 2021-22 SY: 120 Elementary School 680 560 New MS - 2021-22 SY: 850 Gross Totals 19,852 19,852 22,012 22,012 22,012 22,012 New ES #17 - 2022-23 SY: 560 *Subtotal (Sum at 95% Utilization Rate)18,859 18,859 20,911 20,911 20,911 20,911 New HS - 2022-23 SY: 1600 Portables @ 95%4,290 4,290 4,290 4,290 4,290 4,290 Total Capacity 23,149 23,149 25,201 25,201 25,201 25,201 This sheet is pulled into the Word document - TMA Projected FTE Enrollment**18,583 18,770 20,294 19,945 19,441 19,545 Permanent Capacity @ 95% (surplus/deficit)276 89 617 966 1,470 1,366 TCM removed "Permanent Cap w/Portables (surplus/deficit)" line from the CFP report 05-17-2021 per DS's recommendation Projected Capacity to House Students *Permanent Capacity and New Construction calculations are based on the 95% utilization factors (See Appendix D) The number of portables may be reduced as permanent capacity projects come on line and are open for instruction AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 16 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT Issaquah SD #411 YEAR 2021 School Site Acquisition Cost: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Student Student Facility Cost/Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.00 $0 560 0.378 0.164 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High 10.00 $0 850 0.195 0.063 $0 $0 High 30.00 $0 1,600 0.218 0.114 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Permanent/Total Sq Ft) Student Student %Perm/Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq.Ft.Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 92.37%$38,000,000 560 0.378 0.164 $23,695 $10,274 Middle/Jr High 92.37%$75,000,000 850 0.195 0.063 $15,916 $5,128 High 92.37%$135,000,000 1,600 0.218 0.114 $17,000 $8,903 TOTAL $56,612 $24,305 Temporary Facility Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Temporary/Total Square Feet) Student Student %Temp/Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq.Ft.Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.63%$0 80 0.378 0.164 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High 7.63%$0 56 0.195 0.063 $0 $0 High 7.63%$0 224 0.218 0.114 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 State Matching Credit: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor Student Student Current Area SPI District Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Cost Allowance Footage Match %SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $238.22 90 0.00%0.378 0.164 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High $238.22 108 0.00%0.195 0.063 $0 $0 High School $238.22 130 38.66%0.218 0.114 $2,612 $1,368 TOTAL $2,612 $1,368 Tax Payment Credit:SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $888,554 $412,686 Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.44%2.44% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $7,800,848 $3,623,074 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.72 $1.72 Present Value of Revenue Stream $13,417 $6,232 Fee Summary:Single Multi- Family Family Site Acquistion Costs $0.00 $0.00 Permanent Facility Cost $56,611.90 $24,304.74 Temporary Facility Cost $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit ($2,611.53)($1,367.71) Tax Payment Credit ($13,417.46)($6,231.69) FEE (AS CALCULATED)$40,582.91 $16,705.34 Local Share $20,291.45 $8,352.67 FINAL FEE $20,291 $8,353 Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee. For the applicable fee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project. SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 17 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: The District previously purchased sites for the new elementary schools, middle school and high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: Elementary $38,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional elementary capacity Middle School $75,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional middle school capacity High School $135,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,709,045 Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) 2,518,228 Temporary Square Footage 190,817 STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $238.22 Percentage of State Match 38.66% AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 18 APPENDIX A 2020-21 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS# OF STANDARD CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (20)**# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @100%PERMANENT CAPACITY AT 95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (20)**CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (20)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2021 HeadcountPERMANENT CAP OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95%***WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95%****APOLLO 28 560 3 36 596 566 7 140 736 699 0 0 736 7 510 56 189 BRIARWOOD 26 520 3 36 556 528 11 220 776 737 0 0 776 11 644 -116 93 CASCADE RIDGE 23 460 3 36 496 471 8 160 656 623 0 0 656 8 413 58 210 CHALLENGER 22 440 4 48 488 464 14 280 768 730 0 0 768 14 462 2 268 CLARK 30 600 3 36 636 604 10 200 836 794 0 0 836 10 561 43 233 COUGAR RIDGE 27 540 4 48 588 559 8 160 748 711 0 0 748 8 504 55 207 CREEKSIDE 27 540 5 60 600 570 10 200 800 760 0 0 800 10 618 -48 142 DISCOVERY 27 540 4 48 588 559 8 160 748 711 0 0 748 8 596 -37 115 ENDEAVOUR 28 560 3 36 596 566 8 160 756 718 0 0 756 8 459 107 259 GRAND RIDGE 26 520 5 60 580 551 12 240 820 779 0 0 820 12 642 -91 137 ISSAQUAH VALLEY 31 620 2 24 644 612 10 200 844 802 0 0 844 10 562 50 240 MAPLE HILLS 20 400 3 36 436 414 4 80 516 490 0 0 516 4 373 41 117 NEWCASTLE 24 480 3 36 516 490 8 160 676 642 0 0 676 8 536 -46 106 SUNNY HILLS 31 620 6 72 692 657 12 240 932 885 0 0 932 12 507 150 378 SUNSET 31 620 7 84 704 669 4 80 784 745 0 0 784 4 566 103 179 ELEMENTARY #16*****0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 TOTAL 401 8020 58 696 8716 8280 134 2680 11396 10826 0 0 11396 134 8398 327 2873 *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs **Average of staffing ratios 1:20 K-2, 1:23 3-5 ***Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment ****Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment ***** E16 is in projected headcount for October 2021, however the building capacities are for the prior year. E16 will open in September of 2021 Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity.The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables.AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 19 APPENDIX B 2020-21 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES MIDDLE SCHOOLS# OF STANDARD CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (26)# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 100%PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (26)CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (26)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2021 HeadcountPERMANENT CAP OVERAGE or SHORTAGE @ 95%**WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95% *** BEAVER LAKE 29 754 3 36 790 751 10 260 1050 998 0 0 1050 10 783 -33 215 ISSAQUAH MIDDLE 28 728 10 120 848 806 8 208 1056 1003 0 0 1056 8 775 31 228 MAYWOOD 39 1014 5 60 1074 1020 6 156 1230 1169 0 0 1230 6 834 186 335 PACIFIC CASCADE 28 728 7 84 812 771 8 208 1020 969 0 0 1020 8 762 9 207 PINE LAKE 31 806 7 84 890 846 2 52 942 895 0 0 942 2 911 -66 -16 MIDDLE SCHOOL #6****0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 686 0 0 TOTAL 155 4030 32 384 4414 4193 34 884 5298 5033 0 0 5298 34 4751 128 968 *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs **Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment ***Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment **** Middle School #6 (MS#6) is in projected headcount for October 2021, however the building capacities are for the prior year. MS#6 will open in September of 2021 Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity. The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables.AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 20 APPENDIX C 2020-21 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOLS# OF CLASSROOMS*ROOM CAPACITY (28)# OF SPECIAL ED ROOMSSPECIAL ED ROOM CAPACITY (12)PERMANENT CAPACITY @ 100%PERMANENT CAPACITY @95%# OF EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMSPORTABLE CAPACITY (28)CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 100%CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY @ 95%FUTURE PORTABLE CLASSROOMSADDT'L PORTABLE CAPACITY (28)MAXIMUM SCHOOL CAPACITYMAXIMUM # OF PORTABLE CLASSROOMSProjected Oct. 2021 HeadcountPERM CAP OVER OR SHORT @ 95%**WITH EXISTING PORTABLES OVERAGE OR SHORTAGE @ 95%*** ISSAQUAH HIGH 72 2016 5 60 2076 1972 10 280 2356 2238 0 0 2356 10 2090 -118 148 LIBERTY HIGH 41 1148 5 60 1208 1148 8 224 1432 1360 0 0 1432 8 1314 -166 46 GIBSON EK HIGH 10 280 0 0 280 266 0 0 280 266 0 0 280 0 166 100 100 SKYLINE HIGH 56 1568 5 60 1628 1547 16 448 2076 1972 0 0 2076 16 1972 -425 0 TOTAL 179 5012 15 180 5192 4932 34 952 6144 5837 0 0 6144 34 5542 -610 295 The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables. *Minus excluded spaces for special program needs ** Headcount Enrollment Compared to Permanent Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) *** Headcount Enrollment Compared to Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity.AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 21 APPENDIX D AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 22 APPENDIX E AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR KENT, ISSAQUAH, AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND ADOPTING UPDATED SCHOOL IMPACT FEES FOR EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, under Renton Municipal Code Section 4‐1‐190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts; and WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts each have requested that the City of Renton adopt their District's current Capital Facilities Plans; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Kent School District have been calculated at $5,818.09 per single family dwelling unit, and $2,457.53 per new multi‐family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior single family dwelling unit rate of $5,692.85 and an increase from the prior multi‐family dwelling unit rate of $2,404.63; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Issaquah School District Capital Facilities plan, the school impact fee rates for the Issaquah School District have been calculated at $20,291 per single family dwelling unit, and $8,353 per new multi‐family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior single family dwelling unit rate of $18,213 and an increase from the prior multi‐family dwelling rate of $12,043; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Renton School District have been calculated at $2,659 per single family dwelling unit, and $4,737 per new multi‐family dwelling unit, a decrease from the prior AGENDA ITEM #6. b) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 2 single family dwelling unit rate of $7,681 and a decrease from the prior multi‐family dwelling unit rate of $4,989; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton Fee Schedule lists the school impact fee rate charged on behalf of each District; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans: A. The Kent School District Six‐Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020‐21 ‐ 2026‐27, dated June 2021; B. The 2021 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated May 27, 2021; and C. The 2021 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated July 14, 2021. SECTION II. The City Council hereby adopts the following school impact fees, to be effective January 1, 2022, which will be listed in an updated City of Renton Fee Schedule: A. Kent School District: 1. $5,818.09 per single family dwelling unit; and 2. $2,457.53 per new multi‐family dwelling unit. B. Issaquah School District: 1. $20,291 per single family dwelling unit; and 2. $8,353 per new multi‐family dwelling unit. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 3 C. Renton School District: 1. $2,659 per single family dwelling unit; and 2. $4,737 per new multi‐family dwelling unit. SECTION III. Copies of each Capital Facilities Plan, attached hereto and adopted by reference will be on file with the City Clerk. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ______ day of _______________________, 2021. ______________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _______________________, 2021. ______________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: ______________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES:1889:9/17/21 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent School District Six‐Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020‐21 ‐ 2026‐27 Dated June 2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2021 through 2026-2027 June 2021 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Denise Daniels, President Ms. Michele Bettinger, Vice President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative Ms. Leslie Hamada, Director Mr. Joe Bento, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 7 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 8 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ................................................................ 9 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 10 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 11 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 12 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 14 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 15 12 2 22 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2021 for the 2021-2022 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity 23 3 33 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the district’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan). 34 4 44 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick’s study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Fall of 2020. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 6.88% of 26,011 King County live births in 2016 is projected for 1,789 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2021. This is an increase of 524 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2021 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the “medium growth” methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 45 5 55 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .277 Middle School .071 Senior High .086 Total .435 Multi-Family Elementary .258 Middle School .058 Senior High .100 Total .416 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,399 single-family dwelling units and 1,020 multi- family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. In preparing the 2021-2022 to 2026-2027 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Dr. Les Kendrick of Educational Data Solutions LLC, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. EDC included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2021. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. 56 6 66 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 October HC Enrollment 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 1 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 Increase / Decrease 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 139 Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93%6.68% Kindergarten 2,134 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 Grade 1 2,017 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 Grade 2 1,905 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 Grade 3 2,082 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 Grade 4 2,000 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 Grade 5 2,044 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 Grade 6 2,026 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 Grade 7 Middle School 2,139 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 Grade 8 " "2,139 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 Grade 9 Senior High 2,455 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 Grade 10 " "2,092 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 Grade 11 " "1,933 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 Grade 12 " "1,646 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 Total Enrollment 2 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 -1,331 Cumulative Increase -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 -2,249 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools For 2021 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2021 67 7 77 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 King County Live Births 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,849 23,611 Increase / Decrease 139 524 -737 -937 -1,184 -1,425 -726 Kindergarten / Birth % 6.68%6.88%6.88%6.94%6.80%6.65%6.51% FD Kindergarten 1,703 1,789 1,739 1,688 1,637 1,587 1,536 Grade 1 1,882 1,787 1,945 1,950 1,951 1,944 1,937 Grade 2 1,980 1,968 1,845 2,000 2,002 1,998 1,992 Grade 3 2,001 2,052 2,014 1,880 2,035 2,033 2,027 Grade 4 1,912 2,083 2,110 2,062 1,922 2,076 2,074 Grade 5 1,937 1,979 2,130 2,148 2,097 1,949 2,105 Grade 6 2,024 2,013 2,032 2,177 2,193 2,135 1,985 Grade 7 Middle School 2,010 2,060 2,024 2,033 2,176 2,188 2,130 Grade 8 " "2,086 2,105 2,130 2,085 2,091 2,233 2,245 Grade 9 Senior High 2,006 2,163 2,157 2,173 2,125 2,126 2,270 Grade 10 " "1,813 2,078 2,213 2,197 2,210 2,157 2,157 Grade 11 " "1,744 1,625 1,841 1,951 1,934 1,942 1,894 Grade 12 " "1,484 1,707 1,571 1,772 1,877 1,855 1,863 Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Yearly Increase/Decrease -1,331 828 341 366 133 -26 -9 Yearly Increase/Decrease %-5.14%3.37%1.34%1.42%0.51%-0.10%-0.03% Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Live births for King County are estimates for year 2021 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 2020 - 2026 Enrollment Projections PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2021 78 8 88 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) III- Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. 89 9 99 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. 910 10 1010 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 1011 11 1111 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 28,564 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2020. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: The 2021-2022 school year will have two academy programs within the district housed at our new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent Board of Directors in 2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project “20 Classrooms”. The new facility has 24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related programs. The previous facility of these two programs (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the voter approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and will be available for additional capacity for our District at the secondary level. iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. 1112 12 1212 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2021 - 2022 SCHOOL Year Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 758 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,813 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KLA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 456 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 850 DISTRICT TOTAL 28,564 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 May 20211213 13 1313 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1314 14 1414 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1415 15 1515 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1516 16 1616 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy – River Ridge Elementary), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School (The Laboratory Academy). At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2021, the following projects to increase capacity will be a part of our student capacity in the Kent School District. • `Construction is more than 80% completed for the New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6 school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. It will open for the 2021-2022 school year. • Construction is more than 95% complete for our new Kent Laboratory Academy at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoia Junior High) for additional classroom space if needed and/or to open another middle school soon. The new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School District. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). 1617 17 1717 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property over the last school year. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. 1718 18 1818 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY 6 New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary Addition Under Construction 2021-2022 758 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH 3 New Academy Site (Kent Laboratory Academy)Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy Under Construction 2021-2022 456 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2020+24 - 31 each 100% # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 1 164th SE (Across from Mattson)25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042 Rural TBD 2 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 10 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. King County King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2021 1819 19 1919 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Kent Laboratory Academy Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kentwood High School Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Sawyer Woods Elementary Kentlake High School River Ridge Elementary Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School 1920 20 2020 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) I - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 2021 21 2121 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2020 was 24,587 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2020, there were an additional 1,102 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 686 attended classes only at the college (“college- only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth and additional programs within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization as well as possible overcrowding of facilities in different parts of the District. 2122 22 2222 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28564 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interim Portable Capacity Total 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,503 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 24,582 24,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 3,921 4,154 2,813 2,447 2,314 2,340 2,349 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2021 2223 23 2323 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 New Elementary School - Kent Valley 758 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 Portable Capacity Required 1 1248 456 336 336 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,248 14,214 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,439 13,671 13,815 13,905 13,837 13,723 13,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 809 543 279 189 257 371 437 Number of Portables Required 52 19 14 14 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2021 2324 24 2424 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-2027 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,096 4,164 4,154 4,118 4,267 4,421 4,374 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,052 984 994 1,030 881 727 774 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2021 2425 25 2525 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Changes to High School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,047 7,574 7,782 8,094 8,146 8,080 8,184 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,250 723 515 203 151 217 113 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2021 2526 26 2626 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2021-2022 through 2026-2027. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. With River Ridge Elementary School (New Valley School Project) and Kent Laboratory Academy (New Academy Project) coming on-line for school year 2021-2022, this will help support the capacity issue that has been an issue for our district. The building rate within the City of Kent and surrounding areas within our boundary continue to be robust. The district is likely to see growth in enrollment due to these conditions. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both the New Valley and Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Impact fees will be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of temporary instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. 2627 27 2727 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) The Kent School District 2021 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent Laboratory Academy, we are advancing opportunity to add capacity for our programs and student-based needs. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an initial plan (Fall 2021) as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) – which will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would follow soon after approval. Portable purchases may be required before the Bond Measure passes as it takes approximately three years from design to open for most large-scale projects such as schools or added permanent capacity. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include detail of any adopted planning. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School Kent Valley (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – River Ridge Elementary $55,000,000 New Academy Facility (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – Kent Laboratory Academy $36,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the decrease in the 2022 CY Consumer Price Index (2.2%) for the Seattle metropolitan area (Previously 2.5% for the 2021 CY). 2728 28 2828 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2021 2829 29 2929 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel , #362206-9081 2021 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 0,000,000 $0 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 5 lots purchased Military Road South SeaTac WA 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 68.95 $6,917,588 $100,328 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2010 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 68.95 $6,917,588 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson)2000 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $100,328 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2021 2930 30 3030 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6)0.277 Elementary 0.258 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.071 Middle School 0.058 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.086 Senior High 0.100 Total 0.435 Total 0.416 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 758 Elementary 115 Middle School 0 Middle School 148 Senior High (Academy)456 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required)25 Elementary $100,328 Senior High (required)38 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary *$55,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $0 Senior High * (Academy)$36,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 125,204 District Funding Assistance Percentage 53.79% Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.3%156,756 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $238.22 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,621,688 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,223,349 Single Family Residence $268,271 Total 95.7%3,505,941 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,746,892 Multi-Family Residence $226,726 Middle School 671,160 Senior High/Other 1,244,645 Total 3,662,697 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 1.41 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0014 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% CPI Inflation Factor 2.20% Per OSPI Website Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)May 2021 3031 31 3131 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.27734 $440.50 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.07076 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.08649 $0.00 Total 75 $100,328 1,214 0.435A $440.50 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.27734 0.903 $18,171.62 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.07076 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.08649 0.998 $6,814.50 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.435 B $24,986.13 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.27734 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.07076 0.016 $0.00 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.08649 0.02 $0.00 Total $0 84 0.435 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.27734 $4,086.86 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.07076 $1,342 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.08649 $1,917D $7,346.10 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$268,271 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $3,366.53 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $440.50 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $24,986.13 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 Subtotal $25,426.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,346.10 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,366.53 Subtotal $10,712.63 Total Unfunded Need $14,713.99 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,357 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment (1538.90) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,818.09 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)June 2020 3132 32 3232 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.25784 $409.53 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.05784 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.100 $0.00 Total $75 100,328 1,214 0.416A $409.53 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.25784 0.903 $16,893.96 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.05784 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.100 0.998 $7,878.95 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.416 B $24,772.91 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.25784 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.05784 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.100 0.02 $0 Total $0 84 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.25784 $3,799.51 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.05784 $1,097 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.1 $2,217D $7,113.22 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$226,726 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $2,845.18 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $409.53 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $24,772.91 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 Subtotal $25,182.44 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $7,113.22 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,845.18 Subtotal -$9,958.40 Total Unfunded Need $15,224.04 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,612 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment ($5,154) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,457.53 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)June 2020 3233 33 3333 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2020 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor Educational Data Solutions, LLC out of Seattle Washington to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2022 calendar year will change based on the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2022 calendar year is 2.2% (Based on the OSPI Applied to LEA & Levy per pupil inflators CPI as of March 2021). For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $125.24 to $5818.06. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $52.90 to $2,457.53. 3334 34 3434 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) ITEM Grade/ Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.334 0.277 Single Family (SF)MS 0.078 0.071 SH 0.117 0.086 Total 0.529 0.435 -0.094 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.187 0.258 Multi-Family (MF)MS 0.043 0.058 SH 0.070 0.100 Total 0.300 0.416 0.116 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96%53.79%-3.17%Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $238.22 12.250 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV)SF $423,247 $268,271 (154,976)Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.MF $164,546 $226,726 62,180 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.41 $1.41 0.0 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.16%2.44%0.28%Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,692.85 $5,818.09 $125.24 2.20% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,403.63 $2,457.53 $53.90 2.20% X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: 3435 35 3535 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 2021 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411 Dated May 27, 2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403 Dated July 14, 2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AB - 2952 City Council Regular Meeting - 27 Sep 2021 SUBJECT/TITLE: Environmental Science Center Fee Waiver RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation Department STAFF CONTACT: Donna Eken, Recreation Program Coordinator EXT.: 6715 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: Total amount of fee to be waived equals $2,887.50 as identified in the fee waiver request. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Environmental Science Center will be hosting local school groups to the Cedar River for our STEM -based Salmon Heroes field trips. We are anticipating no more than 15 days of field trips scheduled during that time (a total of 750 students plus teachers and adult chaperone's). Rental cost per field trip day will be $192.50 per day at Cedar River Park ( $25.00 per hour for open space and $30 per hour for field rental for 3.5hrs per day). We will have no more than 100 people on site per day. Exact dates wi ll be determined with schools after teachers. During these field trips, students will study the Cedar River, looking at habitat features and testing the water quality of the river. A game played in the nearby field will help them understand the challenges that students face as they travel from the rivers to the oceans. Students discuss storm water pollution and brainstorm ways to keep the local waters safe and healthy. EXHIBITS: A. Environmental Science Center Fee Waiver STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the requested fee wavier of $2,877.50 for open space and field rental at Cedar River Park. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FEE WAIVER OR REDUCTION REQUEST Fee waiver and/or reduction requests will be submitted for approval to the City Council via the Finance Committee. Request date: Name of group: Group contact/number: Address (Street, State, Zip): Email address: Date of event: Number in party: Location/Address: Type of event: Staff contact/number: What is the total cost of the rental and applicable fees? What is the cost of the fee waiver or reduction requested? Describe event and explain why a reduction or waive of fees will benefit our Renton citizens: AGENDA ITEM #6. c) AB - 2953 City Council Regular Meeting - 27 Sep 2021 SUBJECT/TITLE: King County Get Active, Stay Active Grant for Adaptive Recreation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation Department STAFF CONTACT: Carrie Nass, Interim Recreation Director EXT.: 6624 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: $10,000 from King County's Get Active, Stay Active grant will go towards new Adaptive Recreation program equipment, team gear, and scholarship fees to cover participant registration fees. SUMMARY OF ACTION: King County's Get Active, Stay Active grant funds will provide scholarships for program registration fees and new equipment and team gear for our Adaptive Recreation participants. $5,000 of the $10,000 grant would go to our Gift of Play scholarship program to cover the registration fees of nearly 150 Adaptive Recreation athletes to participate in one of our 10 sports. Many of our local athletes lack the funds to cover registration fees due to familial circumstances, unemployment, or underemployment due to their disability. Participation in Renton's team sports does wonders for our athletes' mental health, self -esteem, physical health, and overall sense of community. Renton Adaptive Recreation currently offers 10 sports throughout the year with different equipment and uniforms required for each sport. Our greatest equipment needs are currently team gear for inclement weather including basketball warmups, Track warmups, Soccer warmups, Cycling warmups, canopies for shade and rain for all seasons as well as repl acements for our softball gear bags, scrimmage vests, and updated tournament uniforms. As a program we do our best to keep our registration fees low to make our sports as accessible as possible. Because of that we usually take our time to replace equipment and only when necessary. $5,000 of this grant would go towards updating team gear and equipment. EXHIBITS: A. King County Get Active, Stay Active Grant Conformation email STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a grant agreement for $10,000 with King County's Get Active, Stay Active grant program, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney Department, and allocate grant funds to City of Renton Recreation Division. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Renton. Do not click links, reply or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. From:Carrie Nass To:Sean Claggett Cc:Jeannie Gabriel Subject:FW: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $4500 Grant for the two items Date:Friday, September 17, 2021 9:37:46 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png CARRIE NASS, MPH Recreation Division Director (interim) Creating an active, vibrant, connected community! Rentonwa.gov| (425) 282-9367 (C) From: Mullendore, Zoe <Zoe.Mullendore@kingcounty.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 2:02 PM To: Doug Levy <Doug@Outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com> Cc: Carrie Nass <CNass@Rentonwa.gov> Subject: RE: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $4500 Grant for the two items Hi Doug, Thanks for your email! The $10,000 for the City of Renton was included in the 2021 Supplemental Omnibus Budget the Council passed at the end of June, so this email can serve as that confirmation. The next step is for King County Parks to send you a link to an online form to fill out and return back to them. That’s where you can submit information on the two programs you’ve outlined below. Parks will then confirm the program or project fits within the Get Active, Stay Active eligibility guidelines and will process the funds. Dave is still alerting grant recipients in our district that they received funds, so Parks will likely reach out to everyone on our D5 list later in August or Early September. I hope that helps! Zoë Zoë Mullendore Policy and Outreach Aide, Councilmember Dave Upthegrove King County Council, District 5 P: 206-263-0817 Follow CM Upthegrove on social media: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | LinkedIn AGENDA ITEM #6. d) From: Doug Levy <Doug@Outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com> Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 4:47 PM To: Mullendore, Zoe <Zoe.Mullendore@kingcounty.gov> Cc: Carrie Nass <CNass@Rentonwa.gov> Subject: FW: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $4500 Grant for the two items ZOE: Are you able to send us a confirmation e-mail once we know these two items are in the budget? From: Doug Levy Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 5:00 PM To: Mullendore, Zoe <Zoe.Mullendore@kingcounty.gov> Subject: RE: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $3500 Grant Item - See below for Renton options Oh that’s great! I will forward on to Carrie Nass – maybe we could do $4500 and $4500 and leave $1K in reserve just in case? When you get the word go ahead and send to both Carrie and i… Thanks so much Zoe! Doug Levy, Owner Outcomes By Levy, LLC (425)922-3999 – Office/Cell Doug@outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com (Work) Levy4@msn.com; Levydtzc@outlook.com (Personal) From: Mullendore, Zoe <Zoe.Mullendore@kingcounty.gov> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 4:46 PM To: Doug Levy <Doug@Outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com> Subject: RE: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $3500 Grant Item - See below for Renton options Thanks, Doug! Both of these sound great and as long as the concept fits within the Get Active, Stay Active eligibility requirements, we don’t have a preference! I did want to flag that we set aside $10,000 for this item, so you could do both ideas and still have funding left over. As far as process goes, once Dave has had a chance to notify all grant recipients, we’ll send the list to DNRP staff who will send you a link to an online form to complete. Once you complete it and the project is approved, the funds will be released to the city. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Let me know if you all have any follow up questions based on this info! Zoë Zoë Mullendore Policy and Outreach Aide, Councilmember Dave Upthegrove King County Council, District 5 P: 206-263-0817 Follow CM Upthegrove on social media: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | LinkedIn From: Doug Levy <Doug@Outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 9:25 AM To: Upthegrove, Dave <Dave.Upthegrove@kingcounty.gov>; Mullendore, Zoe <Zoe.Mullendore@kingcounty.gov> Cc: Phibbs, Diana <Diana.Phibbs@kingcounty.gov>; Carrie Nass <CNass@Rentonwa.gov> Subject: County Councilmember Upthegrove -- $3500 Grant Item - See below for Renton options Good Monday morning, CM Upthegrove and Zoe – cc Diana: Please see below for the two options Renton has identified for the $3500 in funds after much deliberations. The City’s community services and parks folks thought these options would provide a more sustainable use of the dollars than a one-time Outdoors for All allocation. You will see that both of these options would be geared toward those with special needs. After you’ve sorted through, and determined what makes most sense to your office, please let us know how you would like us to proceed – and thanks for the opportunity! Doug Levy, Owner Outcomes By Levy, LLC (425)922-3999 – Office/Cell Doug@outcomesbylevy.onmicrosoft.com (Work) Levy4@msn.com; Levydtzc@outlook.com (Personal) Cc: Carrie Nass, Recreation & Neighborhoods Division Manager The two options Renton asked that I send along – here: Donation to Gift of Play A donation of $3,500 to Gift of Play would cover the registration fees of nearly 100 Adaptive Recreation athletes to participate in one of our 10 sports. Many of our local athletes lack the AGENDA ITEM #6. d) funds to cover registration fees due to familial circumstances, unemployment, or underemployment due to their disability. Participation in Renton's team sports does wonders for our athletes' mental health, self-esteem, physical health, and overall sense of community. Gift to Fund Renton Adaptive Recreation Equipment Renton Adaptive Recreation currently offers 10 sports throughout the year with different equipment and uniforms required for each sport. Our greatest equipment needs are currently team gear for inclement weather including basketball warmups, Track warmups, Soccer warmups, Cycling warmups, canopies for shade and rain for all seasons as well as replacements for our softball gear bags, scrimmage vests, and updated tournament uniforms. As a program we do our best to keep our registration fees low to make our sports as accessible as possible. Because of that we usually take our time to replace equipment and only when necessary. Approximate cost: $3,500. -Carrie CARRIE NASS, MPH | Recreation & Neighborhoods Division Manager Creating an active, vibrant, connected community! Rentonwa.gov| (425) 282-9367 (C) AGENDA ITEM #6. d) AB - 2954 City Council Regular Meeting - 27 Sep 2021 SUBJECT/TITLE: 2021/2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Amendment Calendar RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Committee of the Whole DEPARTMENT: Finance Department STAFF CONTACT: Kari Roller, Finance Administrator EXT.: 6931 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: There is no fiscal impact. This agenda bill sets the required public hearings and presents the budget calendar to Council. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In compliance with RCW 35A.34, this agenda bill sets the following dates and times for all ordinances/resolutions related to the proposed 2021/2022 mid -biennium adjustment: 1. Submission of the proposed budget to the City Clerk and presented to the City Council at the October 4, 2021 Committee of the Whole. 2. Establish public hearings for October 18, 2021 and November 1, 2021 which includes a discussion of revenue sources and the proposed mid-biennium budget adjustment. The following ordinances/resolutions will be presented as part of the public hearing process: a. 2022 Property Tax Levy (revenue sources) b. Proposed Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment c. Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustments EXHIBITS: A. 2021/2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Amendment Calendar STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set public hearing dated October 18, 2021 and November 1, 2021 to consider the proposed 2022 Property Tax Levy (revenue sources), the proposed 2021/2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment, proposed Fee Schedule adjustments, and a proposed adoption of all related ordinances/resolutions by November 15, 2021. AGENDA ITEM #6. e) CITY OF RENTON PRELIMINARY 2021-2022 MID-BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise specified, all meetings will be held remotely through Zoom. October 4, 2021 – Committee of the Whole – 6:00 p.m. Council budget workshop: Proposed Mid-Biennium Adjustments (ordinance) Proposed Property Tax Levy (ordinance) Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustments (resolution) October 18, 2021 – Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m. Public hearing as required by RCW 35A.34: Proposed 2022 Property Tax Levy (revenue sources) Proposed Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustments November 1, 2021 – Committee of the Whole (if needed) – 6:00 p.m. Council budget workshop: Follow up to Council questions Deliberation Finalize Committee Report November 1, 2021 – Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m. Public hearing as required by RCW 35A.34: Proposed 2022 Property Tax Levy (revenue sources) Proposed Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustments Adopt Committee Report 1st reading of 2021/2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Amendment ordinance 1st reading of the 2022 Property Tax Levy ordinances November 15, 2021 – Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m. 2nd reading and adoption of all ordinances Adoption of the Fee Schedule Resolution AGENDA ITEM #6. e) AB - 2956 City Council Regular Meeting - 27 Sep 2021 SUBJECT/TITLE: Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-361 with the Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches for the Center of Hope RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Equity, Housing, and Human Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Preeti Shridhar, Equity, Housing, and Human Services Administrator EXT.: 6569 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The fiscal impact of entering into Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-361 with the Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches (REACH) for the Center of Hope is $115,000. The cost of the amendment will be charged to the Human Services General Fund allocation. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The REACH Center of Hope has been operating in city-owned facilities under terms of CAG 19-361. As a result of COVID-related relocations, REACH has identified increased program costs for which it has requested additional funding from the city to offset those expenses and address the need for additional time. Staff is requesting Council’s support to approve Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-361 to cover the cost of six months of expenditures, which adds three months to the current agreement with REACH as outlined above using a portion of the Human Services General Fund allocation. Approval of this amendment will ensure that impacted families remain safe while we continue to navigate through the COVID pandemic. EXHIBITS: A. Amendment No. 1 CAG-19-361 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 1 to CAG-19-361 with the REACH Center of Hope for $115,000 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. The cost of the agreement will be funded by the Human Services General Fund allocation. AGENDA ITEM #6. f) AMENDMENT NO. _1_ TO AGREEMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AGREEMENT – RENTON ECUMENICAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES FOR THE CENTER OF HOPE (CAG # 19-361) THIS AMENDMENT, dated for reference purposes only as September 27, 2021, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches (“REACH”) (“Consultant”), a Washington nonprofit corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Amendment as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Amendment is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. Whereas, the City engaged the services of the Consultant under Agreement CAG-19-361, dated December 11, 2019, to provide necessary services for the Center of Hope, and direct provision of services for homeless families and single women (referred to herein as the “Agreement”); Whereas, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement to change the scope of work, time of performance, and compensation in order to meet funding shortfalls related to COVID-19 impacts and the loss of City-provided space . NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed upon that CAG-19-361 is amended as follows: 1. Scope of Work: Section 1, Scope of Work, is amended to reflect that the City of Renton will no longer provide City facilities to host the Center of Hope. 2.Time of Performance: Section 3, Time of Performance, is amended to extend the time of performance by 3 months from December 31, 2021. All Work shall be performed by no later than April 1, 2022. 3. Compensation: Section 4, Compensation, is amended so that the maximum amount of compensation payable to Consultant is increased by $115,000.00 (one hundred fifteen thousand dollars) from $_120,000.00 in the second year__ to $_235,000.00 in the second year_. The additional compensation shall be paid on a one-time lump-sum basis as soon as is practicable following approval and execution of this Amendment. 4.All terms of the Agreement not explicitly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect and such terms shall apply to Work performed according to this Amendment as if fully set forth herein. AGENDA ITEM #6. f) PAGE 2 OF 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Amendment as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Rev. Bianca Davis-Lovelace Executive Director _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ M. Patrice Kent Senior Assistant City Attorney Contract Template Updated 06/17/2021 AGENDA ITEM #6. f) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF 11TH AVENUE N, SOUTH OF HARRINGTON PLACE NE AND NORTH OF SUNSET LANE NE. (SOLERA STREET VACATION; VAC‐20‐002.) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of right‐of‐way as hereinafter more particularly described was filed with the City Clerk on November 12, 2020, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two‐thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the portion of street to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 4428, passed on March 22, 2021, set April 19, 2021, at 7:00 p.m., by means of the Zoom video conferencing web application as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk gave proper notice of this public hearing as provided by law, and all persons were heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council considered all information and arguments presented to it to determine whether the vacation is in the public interest, whether the property is not required for overall circulation of traffic within the City, and that the requested vacation is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Community and Economic Development Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that it is unlikely that injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; and AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 2 WHEREAS, on September 20, 2021, the City Council determined that the vacation should be granted and adopted the recommendation of the Community and Economic Development Department to set compensation pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 9‐14‐5. B at zero dollars ($0) for the right‐of‐way vacation in consideration of a mutually agreed right‐ of‐way dedication from the Petitioner; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described portion of 11th Avenue N, to wit: The northeasterly‐most portion of 11th Avenue N, south of Harrington Place NE and north of Sunset Lane NE. See Exhibit A, and depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, is hereby vacated. SECTION II. Upon recommendation of the Community and Economic Development Department, and in consideration of the value of the mutually agreed right‐of way dedication, compensation is hereby set at zero dollars ($0) for this right‐of‐way vacation. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance’s title. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Recorder’s Office, and as otherwise provided by law. AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) ORDINANCE NO. ________ 3 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2021. Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:2176:8/25/2021 AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)