Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CITY COUNCIL RETREAT for 02/26/2016
CITY e,nto�n AGENDA City Council Retreat 8:30 AM- Friday, February 26,2016 Maplewood Greens, Cedar Room 8:30 am 1. COMMUNICATION WITH ADMINISTRATION a) Better Way to Provide Progress Reports on Long-developing Issue, Chronic Issues b) Briefing on Key Topics and Emerging Issues 9:15 am 2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW a) Prioritization Memo b) Summaries c) General Governmental Capital Plan d) 2016 Capital Projects Status Parks Facilities e) Arts and Culture Master Plan Priorities and Recourse Strategies 1%for Art Municipal Arts Commission Code f) Senior Center g) Other? 10:45 am Break 11:00 am 3. SIDEWALKS Complete Streets Policy&City's Sidewalk Repair Program a) Sidewalks Attachment C Noon Lunch 12:30 pm 4. TRAFFIC CONGESTION & GROWTH ISSUES Impact on Renton from Neighboring Cities a) Pass-through Impacts -What We Know b) Bluetooth Technology c) How Can Renton Have Input and/or Influence Decisions d) Partnering with Neighboring Cities to Address Impacts 1:30 pm 5. UPDATE ON BENSON HILL COMMUNITY PLAN a) The Plan 2:00 pm 6. ANNEXATION POLICY REVIEW a) The Policy 2:30 pm Break 2:45 pm 7. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND PROGRAMS a) "Adopt-a-Street" Program b) Better Involvement -Is Our Current Effort Enough? Code Compliance Code Enforcement 3:30 pm 8. BUSINESS PLAN UPDATE a) Current Plan 4:00 pm 9. CLOSING COMMENTS AND ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM #2. a) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Cityof DEPARTMENT , M E M O R A N D U M DATE: February 19, 2016 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Iwen Wang, Administrative Services Administrator (x6858) SUBJECT: 2016 Council Planning Workshop-CIP Review/Prioritization Process ISSUE How are current capital projects prioritized and how can we get Council involved early and more frequently? BACKGROUND AND CURRENT PRACTICE This question was a discussion item at Urgency r Capital Project Prioritization Criteria Urgent/ External Coordinate;Maintain Improve the City Councils 2014 Planning mmediate Resources nternal Service Service safety Timing Resources Level Level Workshop. Staff presented the capital Community safety and health Preservation of public health,safety,or mission critical project list for 2013-14 and a proposed program/operation Compliance with laws/regulations set of criteria to evaluate and prioritize Required/mandated by court,federal,state government laws/regulations2015-16 capital projects for the Promote economic development Urban and neighborhood renewal,job upcoming 2015-16 biennial budget. The attraction/protection,growth in general city revenue Community value criteria was discussed and referred to preserve/protect natural resources and environment, Finance Committee for further review `o provide fair and equitable access,user demand and E participation,improve workforce and customer satisfaction E and a roval. As a result of these - Financial stewardship p p Return on investment(grants or other resources leveraged, ongoing cost reduction,consolidate discussions, staff added a capital project duplicative/overlapping services and costs,more costly investments avoided,net revenue generated) status report in April/May each year and Consistency with adopted plans an early review process for proposed Comp plan,business plan,community plan(s),TIP,PRO, and other planning documents,including increase capacity capital projects for the upcoming to keep pace with growth biennial budget in August/September. The proposed criteria matrix considers the timing or urgency of a project and the importance of projects as related to the community's priorities and City's long term strategic goals. We also asked staff to use a scale of 1-5 when assigning points to a project based on the degree they meet the criterion. As staff developed the 2015-2020 capital plans, it became apparent that many projects ended up with the same or nearly the same priority scores when using the criteria and scoring process and did not help us building a prioritized projects list. In the end, some departments also used their judgment and AGENDA ITEM #2. a) compared relative importance/timing to rank the projects, and some major maintenance projects are not ranked. While staff provided proposed capital projects to Council in advance of the preliminary budget, Council was not asked to and did not provide specific direction on project ranking at the August presentation. PROPOSED CHANGES TO CURRENT PROCESS • Staff will continue to use criteria similar to those contained in the matrix but will also rely on relative importance and urgency of projects in their ranking instead of a pure score based system. • Staff will continue to provide two interim briefings to Council on proposed capital plans, one in April/May and one in August/September, as part of the biennial budget development process. Staff will specifically seek Council guidance in project priorities. • Staff will continue to provide project status briefings during the off-budget-year. The briefing will be focused on the status of current projects and any changes to project budget as proposed or approved in the quarterly/mid-year budget adjustments. Attachments: 1. Summary pages of 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Plan 2. 2015-2060 General Governmental Capital Projects with details 3. 2016 Parks capital project funding status AGENDA ITEM #2. b) CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM-SUMMARY CITY WIDE SUMMARY Adopted Projected Project Departments 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total General Government 3,366 5,392 21,724 9,011 12,416 3,624 55,533 Transportation 14,275 6,832 19,894 47,750 59,048 56,341 204,140 Airport 540 2,008 11,823 12,698 1,655 1,015 29,739 Golf Course 50 70 385 445 1,340 2,580 4,870 Water Utility 5,440 6,190 5,194 2,635 2,285 2,285 24,029 Wastewater Utility 4,100 3,550 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 21,650 Surface Water Utility 1 5,000 1 3,000 1 5,000 1 3,050 1 3,000 1 5,000 1 24,050 Total 32,771 1 27,042 1 67,520 1 79,089 1 83,244 1 74,345 364,011 Adopted Projected Project Resources 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total User Fee 369 394 493 328 388 508 2,481 REET 1,000 2,000 - - - - 3,000 Fuel Tax 640 650 660 670 680 680 3,980 Bond Proceeds - - - - - 178 178 Utility Tax 325 325 - - - - 650 Business License/B&O Tax 2,491 3,436 1,575 1,725 1,748 1,766 12,741 Operating 11,330 13,288 14,593 10,325 9,943 12,815 72,294 Grants/Contribution 13,374 4,661 10,894 11,009 174 534 40,646 Mitigation Funds Received 196 - - - - - 196 Misc/Transfers 1,300 1,140 - - - - 2,440 Interest Income 294 315 385 296 284 345 1,918 KC levy Prop 1 transfer 197 197 197 197 197 - 985 Other Government Resources In-Hand 125 95 1,000 1,000 - - 2,220 Fund Balance 1 1,130 - 1,130 Total 32,771 1 26,501 1 29,798 1 25,550 1 13,414 1 16,826 144,860 Balance Available/UnfundedNeeds (541) (37,722) (53,539) (69,830) (57,519) (219,152) Capital Investment Program-City Wide Summary 5-5 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM A-Acquisition,D-Development/Redevelopment,M-Maintenance/Preservation,P-Planning,X-Cross Category Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project # Projects Priority Type* Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Acquisition Opportunity-Coulon Park A - 1,000 - - - - 1,000 2 Black River Riparian Forest D - 90 100 200 2,000 2,390 3 Maplewood Community Park D - 150 400 4,000 225 4,775 4 Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion D 94 508 650 3,000 4,500 - 8,752 5 Springbrook Trail Missing Link D 650 - 100 2,000 - 2,750 6 Sunset EIS Park D 1 3,329 200 - 6,000 - 9,530 7 Piazza Master Plan&Redevelopment D - - 100 300 3,500 3,900 8 North Highlands Park Improvements D 280 80 - 360 9 Liberty Park Improvements D 300 1,000 1,300 10 Accessible Playground D 1,274 - - - - 1,274 11 Fire Station 15 D -1 1 5,912 650 1 6,562 12 Riverview Park Bridge Reconstruction M 6 1,167 - - 1,173 13 Coulon Park Repairs and Maintenance M 20 1,291 170 680 760 150 50 50 3,171 14 City-wide Security System Upgrades M 334 71 90 90 90 90 90 90 945 15 Irrigation Renovation,Automation and Conservation M 159 15 - 250 265 265 15 15 984 16 Parks Major Maintenance M 1,284 600 555 550 620 650 2,440 315 7,014 17 Parking Lots and Drive Repairs M - 100 150 80 80 80 80 80 650 18 Ball field Renovation Program M 71 - 50 50 75 50 - - 296 19 Paths,Walks,Patios and Boardwalks M 546 112 130 40 - 40 - - 868 20 Sports Court Repairs M 74 59 150 80 50 50 50 50 563 21 Habitat Enhancement M - - - - 25 25 25 25 100 22 Tree Maintenance M 611 261 275 275 310 310 310 310 2,662 23 Transportation Landscape Improvements M - - 75 75 150 150 150 150 750 24 Sr Center Kitchen Remodel M - 40 920 - - - 960 25 Museum Lobby Renovation M - - 30 - - - - - 30 26 Henry Moses Aquatic Center M 831 106 120 120 120 120 120 120 1,657 27 Renton Community Center Improvements M - - 120 - - - - - 120 28 City Hall Lobby Remodel M - 250 250 500 29 City Hall Carpet Replacement M 250 250 500 30 City Hall Roof M - 380 - 380 31 Permit Area Reconfiguration M - - 180 100 - 280 32 Community Services Maint.Shop Rehab M 223 100 160 90 573 33 Sign Shop M - - - 182 182 34 Leased Facilities M 1,263 204 - - - 1,467 35 1 Downtown Wayfinding M 1 171 100 100 1 250 1 621 36 Benson/Cascade Park P - - - 250 250 37 Parks,Recreation and Open Space Plan P 213 125 - 338 38 Park Master Planning P - - 90 90 90 90 360 39 Integrated Pest Management Program P 100 - - - 100 40 Trails and Bike Master Plan P - - 50 - - - - - 50 41 Capital Project Coordination X 332 75 81 85 90 94 99 104 960 42 Limited Term Certified Arborist X - - - - - - - - - 43 Limited Term Capital Project Coordinator X - - 44 Grant Matching Program X 211 211 45 Disaster Repairs X - - - 46 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Earmarked X 653 459 1,112 47 12013 KC Proposition 1 Parks Levy Fund X 197 197 197 591 Total Capital Project Expenditures 7,537 9,942 1 3,366 1 5,392 1 21,7241 9,011 1 12,416 1 3,6241 73,011 Life to Estimated Date year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total REET 925 2,200 1,000 2,000 6,125 Utility Tax 351 425 325 325 1,426 B&O Tax/Business License Fee 400 400 500 1,436 2,736 Operating 700 204 - - 904 Grants/Contribution Received 1,245 52 2 1,299 Mitigation Funds Received 1,350 - - 1,350 Grants/Contribution Anticipated - 1,067 14 - 1,081 Transfersfrom otherfunds 1,206 1,272 1,300 1,140 4,918 Interest Income - - 7 5 12 2013 KC Prop 1levy - 197 197 197 197 197 197 1,182 2007 KC Prop 2 Levy Earmarked 1,112 - - - - - - 1,112 Beginning Fund Balance 1 2,4671 4,322 1 6,789 Total Capital Project Resources 9,756 10,139 44 3,35,103 197 197 197 28,933 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 2,219 1 197 1 (22) (289) (21,527) (8,814) (12,219) (3,624) (44,078) AGENDA ITEM #2. b) TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY BY COUNCIL PRIORITY Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project a Projects Priority Type* Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Street Overlay 1 M 722 885 750 773 837 870 910 952 6,699 2 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2 M - 1,451 - - 415 468 491 491 3,316 3 Preservation of Traffic Oper Device Program 3 M 122 67 62 62 62 62 62 62 561 4 Bridge Inspection&Repair Program 4 M 16 200 30 30 100 100 100 100 676 5 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacem Frog 5 M - 413 100 100 100 130 130 100 1,073 6 Maple Valley Highway Attenuator 6 M - - - - 1,180 - - - 1,180 7 Roadway Safety and Guardrail Program 7 M 8 15 15 15 15 15 20 25 128 8 SW 27th St-Loan Repayment * C 299 150 150 150 - - - - 749 9 S 7th St-Rainier Ave S to Talbot Rd S * C 49 1,015 254 - 200 1,400 1,300 5,800 10,018 10 Carr Road Improvements * C 27 2,694 601 200 - - - 3,522 11 Logan Ave N Improvements 1 C 394 746 7,400 1,240 10,000 6,000 7,440 33,220 12 Rainier Ave S Phase 4(S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI) 2 C - - 1,200 1,806 1,500 6,000 8,800 - 19,306 13 Main Ave S/Downtown Circulation Project 3 C 49 150 850 - - - - - 1,049 14 NE Sunset Boulevard(SR 900)Corridor 4 C 200 720 1,680 - 2,000 7,800 9,700 8,100 30,200 15 Duvall Ave NE-NE 4th St to Sunset Blvd NE 5 C - - 241 1,856 1,910 2,310 4,680 5,265 16,262 16 Houser Way N-N 8th St to Lake Washington Blv 6 C - - - - 2,145 2,030 - - 4,175 17 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 7 C 3,714 10 - - 700 3,540 4,680 2,700 15,344 18 Park Ave N Extension 8 C - - - - 3,000 3,000 19 Sunset Area Green Connections 8 C - 3,600 10,700 7,900 22,200 20 S Grady Way-Main Ave to West City Limits 9 C 500 1,275 1,500 - 3,275 21 116th Ave SE Improvements 10 C - 118 700 600 1,600 4,140 3,160 10,318 22 Lake Washington Blvd N-Park Ave N to Gene Cc 11 C 422 10 - - 1,000 1,000 - - 2,432 23 Lind Ave SW-SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 12 C - - 400 1,650 2,350 4,400 24 10akesdale Ave SW/Monster Rd SW/68th Ave S t 13 C - - - 50 8,000 1 8,050 25 Intersection Safety&Mobility Program 1 S 104 61 70 250 250 250 250 250 1,485 26 Traffic Safety Program 2 S 85 347 40 40 40 40 40 40 672 27 Lake to Sound(L2S)Trail 1 N - - - - 570 685 - - 1,255 28 Lake Washington Loop Trail 2 N 200 285 670 3,640 3,580 3,240 - 11,615 29 Barrier-Free Transition Plan Implementation 3 N 7 50 30 30 25 40 40 41 263 30 Walkway Program 4 N - 115 124 45 360 250 250 250 1,394 31 Arterial Circulation Program 1 O 44 180 120 145 145 145 150 150 1,079 32 Project Development&Pre-Design Program 2 O 30 160 110 115 115 115 120 120 885 33 ITS Program 4 O 3 57 30 30 30 30 30 30 240 34 1%for the Arts Program 5 O 1 11 1 15 15 15 1 15 15 1 15 1 15 1 116 Total 6,308 9,711 14,275 6,832 19,894 47,750 59,048 1 56,341 1 220,159 Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources: Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Vehicle Fuel Tax 603 810 640 650 660 670 680 680 5,393 Business License Fee 1,332 1,887 1,990 2,000 1,575 1,725 1,748 1,766 14,024 Grants In-Hand(1) 2,006 5,275 5,488 3,262 570 685 - - 17,286 Grants In-Hand(2) 361 417 4,729 575 - - - - 6,081 Mitigation In-Hand 686 54 196 - 936 Bonds/LID's Formed - - - - - - - - 0 Other Gov't Resources In-Hand(1) 262 (21) - 1,000 1,000 2,241 Other Gov't Resources In-Hand(2) - 150 125 95 - - - - 370 Grants Proposed - - 0 Other Proposed - 225 - 225 Proposed Fund Balance 1,214 1,139 1,130 - - - - - 3,483 Undetermined - - - - - 0 Total Resources 6,465 9,936 14,298 6,582 3,805 4,080 2,428 2,446 50,039 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 157 1 225 1 23 1 (250) (16,089) (43,670) (56,620) (53,895) (170,119) * NOTE:M-Maintenance&Preservation,C-Corridor Projects,S-Safety,N-Non-Motorized,T-Transit,and O-Other ** Projects under construction and/or with a phase under construction #Corresponds to project number(#)on individual project pages Capital Investment Program-Transportation 5-61 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) AIRPORT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY Life to Estimated Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project a Projects Priority Type* Thru2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Seaplane Launch Ramp Replacement 2 D - - - 167 - 167 - 400 734 2 Taxiway Alpha Rehabilitation 3 D - - - 556 11,278 11,111 - - 22,945 3 Fire Water System Rehabilitation 4 D 84 242 25 25 25 25 25 25 476 4 608 Hangar Expansion NA D - - - - 105 945 - - 1,050 5 622 Hangar-Rehabilitation NA D - - 110 990 1,100 6 ISE Corner Land Acquisition/Demolition 6 A - - - 95 - - - 95 7 Major Facility Maintenance 1 M 716 354 350 175 175 175 175 175 2,295 8 Storm Water System Rehabilitation 5 M 230 85 150 900 150 150 450 150 2,265 9 Maintenance Dredging and Shoreline Mitigation 7 M 620 903 15 15 15 15 15 265 1,863 10 Runway Safety Area 8 P - - - 75 75 - - - 150 Total 1,650 1,584 1 540 1 2,008 11,823 1 12,698 1,655 1,015 32,973 Life to Estimated Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources: Thru2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total User Fee - - - - - - - - - REET - - - - - - - - - Fuel Tax - - - - - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - Operating 1,634 1,114 627 1,295 1,568 1,493 665 655 9,051 Grants/Contribution Received 16 334 - - - - - - 350 Mitigation Funds Received - - - - - - - - - Grants/Contribution Anticipated 136 650 10,150 10,150 360 21,446 Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - - - - - - - Misc/Transfers/Interfund Loan In terest Income - - - - - - - - - Beginning Fund Balance - - - - - - - - - Total Resources 1,650 1,584 627 1,945 11,718 11,643 665 1 1,015 30,847 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) - I - 1 87 1 (63) (105) (1,055) (990) - *NOTE:A-Acquisition,D-Development,M-Major Maintenance,R-Regulatory Compliance,P-Planning Capital Investment Program-Airport 5-97 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) GOLF COURSE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM I o • 1 1 • • o • o• • SUMMARY Life to Estimate Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project u Projects Priority Type* Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Maintenance Building and Pumphouse D - - - - - - 300 2,500 2,800 2 Reconstruction of the 13th and 15th Greens D 140 - - 140 3 Reconstruction of the 10th and 16th Greens D - 130 130 4 Irrigation Mainline Replacement D - - - - 850 850 5 Golf Course Major Maintenance M 174 194 50 70 385 305 60 80 1,318 Total 1 1741 1941 50 1 70 1 385 1 445 1 1,3401 2,580 5,238 Life to Estimate Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources: Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total User Fee - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Operating 174 194 50 50 385 445 1,340 2,580 5,218 Grants/Contribution Received - - - - - - - Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated Misc/Transfers Interest Income - - Beginning Fund Balance - - 20 - - - - 20 Total 1 1741 1941 50 1 50 1 3851 445 1 1,3401 2,5801 5,218 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (20) - *NOTE:A-Acquisition,D-Development,M-Major Maintenance,R-Regulatory Compliance,T-Transfer Capital Investment Program-Golf Course 5-109 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) WATER UTILITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project It Projects Priority Type* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Emergency Response Projects 1 M 244 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 594 2 Water Main Replacement 2 M 4,134 1,760 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 12,294 3 Transmission Main Replacement 3 M 817 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 4,317 4 Automatic Meter Reading Conversion 4 M 3,474 1,450 1,050 750 100 100 100 100 7,124 5 Telemetry Improvements 5 M 407 170 250 150 50 50 50 50 1,177 6 Emergency Power to Water Facilities 7 M 3,039 50 240 70 - - - - 3,399 7 Water System Security 8 M 62 100 100 50 50 50 50 50 512 8 Reservoir Recoating 10 M 657 175 150 150 100 100 100 100 1,532 9 Maplewood Pump Station Roof Replacement 11 M - 30 280 - - - - - 310 10 IMaplewood Filter Media Replacement 12 M I - 200 1 50 501 50 501 50 50 500 11 Water System Plan Update 9 R 546 5 20 20 120 120 70 70 971 12 Aquifer Monitoring and Management 13 R 77 50 50 30 15 15 15 15 267 13 Highlands 435-Zone Reservoirs 6 D 35 2,536 1,600 3,270 3,059 500 - - 11,000 14 Water Main Oversizing 14 D 60 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 760 Total Six-Year Project Costs 13,552 7,176 5,440 6,190 5,194 2,635 2,285 2,285 44,757 Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total User Fee 397 87 103 118 99 50 43 43 939 Operating 12,528 7,046 5,234 5,954 4,996 2,535 2,198 2,199 42,690 Misc/Tronsfers 200 - - - - - - - 200 Interest Income 428 44 103 117 99 50 43 43 928 Total Resources 13,552 7,176 5,440 6,190 5,194 2,635 2,285 2,285 44,756 Balance Available/UnfundedNeeds - I - I - I - - - I - I - - * A-Acquisition,D-Development,M-Major Maintenance,R-Regulatory Compliance,T-Transfer Capital Investment Program-Water 5-117 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) WASTEWATER CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY Life to Estimated Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Date Year End Page# Projects Priority Type* Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Thunder Hill Interceptor Repl/Rehab 1 M 2 400 700 3,000 - - - - 3,702 2 Cascade Int.Restoration Ph II 2 M - - 900 - - - - - 900 3 Miscellaneous/Emergency Projects 4 M 289 120 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,489 4 2015 Sanitary Sewer Main Repl/Rehab 5 M - - 1,300 - - - - - 1,300 5 Falcon Ridge Lift Station Rehabilitation 7 M - - - 150 850 - - - 1,000 6 Forcemain Rehab/Replacement 8 M - - 350 200 200 - 500 - 1,250 7 Lift Station Rehabilitation 9 M - - - - 350 500 500 500 1,850 8 2017 Sanitary Sewer Main Repl/Rehab 10 M - - - - 1,500 - - - 1,500 9 2018 Sanitary Sewer Main Repl/Rehab 11 M - - - - - 1,600 - - 1,600 10 2019 Sanitary Sewer Main Repl/Rehab 12 M - - - - - - 2,300 - 2,300 11 2020 Sanitary Sewer Main Repl Rehab 13 M - - - - - - - 2,200 2,200 12 Telemetry Upgrade 15 M 303 20 - - - - - 300 603 13 Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model 1 16 1 M 1 376 150 1 300 676 14 Develop Access Road-Aberdeen Apt/VMC 3 D 58 240 400 - - - - - 458 15 Heather Downs Interceptor 14 D 71 - - - 400 1,200 - - 1,671 16 Long Range Wastewater Management Plan 6 R 85 - 250 - - - - - 335 Total 1,185 930 4,100 3,550 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 23,765 Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources: Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total User Fee 177 28 101 107 105 105 175 175 973 Operating 977 874 3,177 3,336 3,255 3,255 3,185 3,185 21,244 Grants/Contribution Received - - 720 - - - - - 720 Interest Income 31 28 101 108 140 140 140 140 828 Total Resources 1 1, 851 930 4,100 3,550 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,5001 23,764 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I - 1 *NOTE:A-Acquisition,D-Development,M-Major Maintenance,R-Regulatory Compliance,T-Transfer Capital Investment Program-Wastewater 5-133 AGENDA ITEM #2. b) SURFACE WATER CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM ® r r ® ® r r r r rr . SUMMARY Life to Estimated Date Year end Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project # Projects Priority Type* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Cedar River Gravel Removal(Maintenance Dredge)Project 1 M - 2,435 2,250 250 250 250 250 250 5,935 2 Maplewood Creek Sedimentation Facility Maint 6 M 292 70 75 75 75 75 75 75 812 3 Madsen Creek Sedimentation Cleaning 7 M 166 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 516 4 Small Drainage Projects Program 15 M 1,473 300 225 225 250 250 250 250 3,223 5 Rainier Ave and Oakesdale Ave Pump Station Upgrades 18 M - - 100 400 - - - - 500 6 Green River Ecosystem Restoration Projects 19 M - 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 150 7 Miscellaneous/Emergency Storm Projects 20 M 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 395 8 Stream Flow and Water Quality Monitoring Pgm 21 M 31 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 101 9 Monroe Ave.NE&NE 2nd Street Infiltration System Improvements NA M - 1 100 - - - 1 300 1,0001 1,400 10 Storm System Field Mapping-NPDES Permit 3 R - 369 75 50 - - - - 494 11 Renton Stormwater Manual Update 5 R - 46 200 75 - - - - 321 12 Surface Water Utility GIS 9 R 511 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,211 13 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank 10 R 567 150 120 120 120 120 120 120 1,437 14 Talbot Hill Area Mosquito Abatement Program 13 R 222 100 75 75 75 75 75 75 772 15 SW 43rd Street/Lind Ave SW Storm Sys Impr 22 R - - - - - 300 600 3,200 4,100 16 Surface Water Utility System Plan NA R 541 55 - - - - - 200 796 17 Hardie Ave SW-SW 7th St Storm System Improvement 2 D 619 5,596 350 350 2,050 - - - 8,965 18 Maplewood Creek Basin Storm Improvements 4 D 9 190 350 200 850 - - - 1,599 19 N 30th St/Burnett Ave N Storm System Impr.Project 8 D - - 500 - - - - - 500 20 NE Sunset Blvd&Union Ave NE Storm System Improvement 11 D - - - 200 200 1,350 - - 1,750 21 Cedar River 205 Project Levee Recertification Project 12 D - 350 350 - - - - - 700 22 Stormwater Facility Fencing Project 14 D 10 190 100 100 100 100 100 100 800 23 Ginger Creek/Cascade Park Basin Plan 16 D - - - 350 - - - - 350 24 SE 172nd St and 125th Ave N Storm System Impr.Project 17 D - - - 300 800 - - - 1,100 25 East Valley Road Storm System Improvements NA D - - - - - - 300 100 400 26 Oakesdale/SW 41st St.Culvert Replacement NA D - - - - I - - - 1 400 400 Total Project Costs 1 4,4861 10,1911 5,000 1 3,000 1 5,000 1 3,050 1 3,0001 5,000 38,727 Life to Estimated Date Yearend Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Total Resources: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 User Fee 143 356 165 170 290 173 170 290 1,758 REET 67 9 - - - - - - 76 Fuel Tax 1,179 6,381 - - - - - - 7,560 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 178 178 Operating 3,852 6,226 2,329 2,571 4,389 2,597 2,555 4,196 28,715 Grants/Contribution Received 67 619 3 3 3 3 3 3 704 Mitigation Funds Received 19 3 - - - - - - 22 Grants/Contribution Anticipated - - 2,421 171 171 171 171 171 3,276 Misc/Tronsfers 1,032 5,019 - - - - - - 6,052 Interest Income 35 794 82 85 147 106 101 162 1,513 Beginning Fund Balance 14 5 1 - I - I - I - I - I - 19 Total Resources/Unfunded Needs 1 6,4081 19,4131 5,000 1 3,000 1 5,000 1 3,050 1 3,000 1 5,000 49,872 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) I - I - I - I - I - I - I - I - I - *NOTE:A-Acquisition,D-Development,M-Major Maintenance,R-Regulatory Compliance,T-Transfer Capital Investment Program-Surface Water 5-151 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM ® r r ® ® r r r r rr A-Acquisition,D-Development/Redevelopment,M-Maintenance/Preservation,P-Planning,X-Cross Category Life to Adjusted Date Budget Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project # Projects Priority Type* Thru2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 Acquisition Opportunity-Coulon Park A - - - 1,000 - - - - 1,000 2 Black River Riparian Forest D - - - 90 100 200 2,000 2,390 3 Maplewood Community Park D - - - - 150 400 4,000 225 4,775 4 Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion D 94 508 - - 650 3,000 4,500 - 8,752 5 Springbrook Trail Missing Link D 650 - - - 100 2,000 - - 2,750 6 Sunset EIS Park D 1 3,329 200 - 6,000 - - - 9,530 7 Piazza Master Plan&Redevelopment D - - 100 300 3,500 - - - 3,900 8 North Highlands Park Improvements D - - 280 80 - - - - 360 9 Liberty Park Improvements D - - 300 1,000 - - - - 1,300 10 Accessible Playground D - 1,274 - - - - - - 1,274 11 Fire Station 15 D - - - - 5,912 650 - - 6,562 12 Riverview Park Bridge Reconstruction M 6 1,167 - - - - - - 1,173 13 Coulon Park Repairs and Maintenance M 20 1,291 170 680 760 150 50 50 3,171 14 City-wide Security System Upgrades M 334 71 90 90 90 90 90 90 945 15 Irrigation Renovation,Automation and Conservation M 159 15 - 250 265 265 15 15 984 16 Parks Major Maintenance M 1,284 600 555 550 620 650 2,440 315 7,014 17 Parking Lots and Drive Repairs M - 100 150 80 80 80 80 80 650 18 Ball field Renovation Program M 71 - 50 50 75 50 - - 296 19 Paths,Walks,Patios and Boardwalks M 546 112 130 40 - 40 - - 868 20 Sports Court Repairs M 74 59 150 80 50 50 50 50 563 21 Habitat Enhancement M - - - - 25 25 25 25 100 22 Tree Maintenance M 611 261 275 275 310 310 310 310 2,662 23 Transportation Landscape Improvements M - - 75 75 150 150 150 150 750 24 Sr Center Kitchen Remodel M - - - 40 920 - - - 960 25 Museum Lobby Renovation M - - 30 - - - - - 30 26 Henry Moses Aquatic Center M 831 106 120 120 120 120 120 120 1,657 27 Renton Community Center Improvements M - - 120 - - - - - 120 28 City Hall Lobby Remodel M - - - - 250 250 - - 500 29 City Hall Carpet Replacement M - - - - 250 250 - - 500 30 City Hall Roof M - - - - 380 - - - 380 31 Permit Area Reconfiguration M - - 180 100 - - - - 280 32 Community Services Maim.Shop Rehab M 223 100 160 90 - - - - 573 33 Sign Shop M - - - 182 - - - - 182 34 Leased Facilities M 1,263 204 - - - - - - 1,467 35 Downtown Wayfinding I M 171 - 1001 100 250 1 621 36 Benson/Cascade Park P - - - - 250 - - - 250 37 Parks,Recreation and Open Space Plan P 213 - - 125 - - - - 338 38 Park Master Planning P - - - - 90 90 90 90 360 39 Integrated Pest Management Program P - - - - 100 - - - 100 40 Trails and Bike Master Plan P - - 50 - - - - - 50 41 Capital Project Coordination X 332 75 81 85 90 94 99 104 960 42 Limited Term Certified Arborist X - - - - - - - - - 43 Limited Term Capital Project Coordinator X - - - - - - - - - 44 Grant Matching Program X 211 - - - - - - 211 45 Disaster Repairs X - - - - - - - - - 46 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Earmarked X 653 459 - - - - - - 1,112 47 2013KC Proposition 1 Parks Levy Fund X - - - - 197 197 197 - 591 Total Capital Project Expenditures 7,537 9,942 1 3,366 1 5,392 1 21,7241 9,0111 12,416 1 3,624 1 73,011 Life to Estimated Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Resources Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total REET 925 2,200 1,000 2,000 - - - - 6,125 Utility Tax 351 425 325 325 - - - - 1,426 B&O Tax/Business License Fee 400 400 500 1,436 - - - - 2,736 Operating 700 204 - - - - - - 904 Grants/Contribution Received 1,245 52 2 - - - - - 1,299 Mitigation Funds Received 1,350 - - - - - - - 1,350 Grants/Contribution Anticipated - 1,067 14 - - - - - 1,081 Transfers from other funds 1,206 1,272 1,300 1,140 - - - - 4,918 Interest Income - - 7 5 - - - - 12 2014 KC levy - 197 197 197 197 197 197 - 1,182 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Earmarked 1,112 - - - - - - - 1,112 Beginning Fund Balance 1 2,4671 4,322 1 -I -I -I -I - - 6,789 Total Capital Project Resources 1 9,7561 10,139 1 3,344 1 5,103 1 197 1 197 1 197 1 28,933 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 2,219 1 197 1 (22) (289) (21,527) (8,814) (12,219) (3,624) (44,078) Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-7 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 1 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Acquisition Opportunity-Coulon Park Project Type: Acquisition Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,000 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Research and identify parcels for potential acquisition to support Coulon Park. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - 1,000 1,000 Consultant Services - - Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 1,000 1,000 Resources: User Fee - - R E ET 1,000 1,000 Fuel Tax - - Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 1,000 1,000 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-8 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 2 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Black River Riparian Forest Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 2,390 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: The Black River Riparian Forest contains an active heron colony,an estimated 75 species of avifauna,and numerous mammals. An interpretive learning center,soft surface paths to view wildlife,and sensitive habitat enhancement are planned. The first phase of this project includes a wildlife/habitat inventory/assessment to determine the suitability and feasibility of an interpretive learning center and associated amenities.Master planning will occur in 2018,followed by construction documents(2019)and construction(2020). Impacts to the operating budget might include utilities,office supply and equipment and labor for the learning center and surrounding amenities. Summary of Progress: This project was identified as a#2 citywide priority in the adopted Parks,Recreation and Naturals Plan(2011). Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - - Construction 90 100 200 2,000 2,390 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - - - Total Expenses 90 100 200 2,000 2,390 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (90) (100) (200) (2,000) (2,390) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 15 15 Net Operating Impact 15 15 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-9 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 3 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Maplewood Community Park Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 4,775 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: This 40-acre site,located adjacent to Maplewood Heights Elementary School and Maplewood Neighborhood Park,is currently owned by King County and will be transferred to the City of Renton(date unknown)for future use as a park site. The area is experiencing rapid residential growth. Long term development plans call for a mixed-use community park that includes both active and passive uses. Consultant selection and master planning is scheduled for 2017;design development, construction document preparation,and bidding in 2018,with phase one development proposed for 2018 at a cost of$4,000,000.Phase 2 design development, construction document preparation,and bidding in 2020,construction in 2021.Impacts include labor,equipment,supplies and utility costs dependant upon the final design of the facility. Summary of Progress: This project was identified as a#5 citywide priority in the adopted Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan(2011). The City and King County have delayed Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - - Consultant Services 150 400 225 775 Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 4,000 4,000 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 150 400 4,000 225 4,775 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (150) (400) (4,000) (225) (4,775) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 250 250 500 Net Operating Impact 250 250 1 500 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-10 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 4 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 8,752 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: This project occurs in three phases. Phase I consisted of the lighted soccer field(all-weather dirt)and softball field,lighted basketball court,one parking lot,entry drive and bridge over Madsen Creek. Phase 11 will include a wetland inventory&delineation,environmental assessment,design and construction documents in 2015. Construction is planned in 2016 to expand the capacity and provide greater programming flexibility by improving the existing all-weather(dirt)soccer field with synthetic turf,constructing a second lighted synthetic turf soccer field,expanding the parking lot,adding potable water supply,restroom facility and sewer,a children's play area,and two picnic shelters. Phase III will convert the existing natural turf softball field to synthetic turf and add a second lighted synthetic turf ball field. Impacts include labor,supplies,equipment and utilities to operate the facility,dependent upon the final design. Summary of Progress: This project is identified as a#1 citywide priority in the Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan(2011). Phase I was completed in 2000. Carry forward unspent Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 30 650 680 Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 94 478 3,000 4,500 8,072 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 94 508 650 3,000 4,500 8,752 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - REET 300 300 Fuel Tax - - Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers 94 94 Interest Income - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance - 208 208 Total Resources 94 508 602 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (650) (3,000) (4,500)1 1 (8,150) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 25 5 5 5 40 Net Operating Impact 25 5 5 5 40 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-11 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 5 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Springbrook Trail Missing Link Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 2,750 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: This project will construct remaining missing links in the existing system between SW 43rd Street and SW Grady Way. The Springbrook Trail is linked to a countywide regional trail system including the Interurban Trail,and extends to the City of Pacific to the south,and north to South Seattle. Impacts include maintenance of the trail and utilities,if any,such as irrigation. Summary of Progress: Project is identified as a#2 priority in the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan(2009).The boardwalk trail was completed in 2010. $50,000 was received from Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 100 100 Major Maintenance - - - - Construction 650 2,000 2,650 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - Total Expenses 650 100 2,000 2,750 Resources: User Fee - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received - - Mitigation Funds Received 650 650 Grants/Contribution Anticipated - - Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - TotalResources 650 650 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (100) (2,000)1 1 1 (2,100) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 5 5 5 15 Net Operating Impact 3 3 3 15 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-12 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 6 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Sunset EIS Park Project Type: Development Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 9,530 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The Sunset Area Community Revitalization Program will redevelop the area with new public housing and encourage development and infrastructure improvements, creating opportunities for affordable housing and retail investment. As part of the redevelopment,park and regional storm water facilities will be integrated into a park master planning process.Survey,design and construction drawings are planned in two phases beginning in 2014 and completed in 2015. Acquistion of the property will occur in 2016 with Construction of the park in 2017. This park was identified in the adopted Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. Impacts include labor,utilities,equipment and supplies to operate and maintain the park. Summary of Progress: The master plan for park development will be adopted in 2014. The Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility,integrated into the park design,will be constructed Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - 2,950 - 2,950 Consultant Services 1 379 200 580 Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 6,000 6,000 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 1 3,329 200 6,000 9,530 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET 1,650 200 1,850 Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 100 100 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer 1,000 1,000 Misc/Transfers 1 250 251 Interest Income - - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance - 329 - 329 Total Resources 1 3,329 200 3,530 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (6,000) (6,000) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 7 9 11 27 Net Operating Impact 7 9 ill 27 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-13 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 7 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Piazza Master Plan&Redevelopment Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 3,900 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Re-master planning of the existing Piazza Park to include the former Big 5 site(2015)in order to combine these areas into one cohesive park venue. Operations will be coordinated with the Renton Pavilion Event Center to maximize opportunities. Design and construction documents in 2016 with construction to follow during 2017. Summary of Progress: City Center Plan supports downtown improvements. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - - Consultant Services 100 300 - 400 Major Maintenance - - - - Construction 3,500 3,500 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 100 300 3,500 3,900 Resources: User Fee - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 100 300 400 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 100 300 400 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (3,500)1 1 1 1 (3,500) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 7 10 12 12 41 Net Operating Impact 7 10 12 12 41 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-14 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 8 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: North Highlands Park Improvements Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 360 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Complete the Meadow Crest Inclusive playground nature area,install artificial turf in the nature area and on the west side of the neighborhood center,refurbish tennis and basketball courts,replace tennis court lighting and a install raised-bed community garden with fencing and gate in 2015.Pave,stripe and repair curbing in the parking lot in 2016. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - Major Maintenance 280 80 360 Construction - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 280 80 360 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income - - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 280 80 360 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 280 80 360 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End AdoptedP r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 1 2 2 2 2 2 11 Net Operating Impact 1 2 2 2 21 2 11 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-15 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 9 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Liberty Park Improvements Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,300 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Master plan and redevelopment of the playground,restroom,picnic area and shelter,river front and connection to the Cedar River Library at Liberty Park. A topographic and site survey of the area will be conducted in 2015. The existing playground,restroom and shelter will be replaced or renovated and includes new landscaping,irrigation,adult fitness equipment and habitat restoration along the Cedar River in 2016. Summary of Progress: Existing budgeted funding(approx.$260,000)for the Liberty Park Playground replacement which is located under Parks General Major Maintenance(Playgrounds, Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - Major Maintenance 300 1,000 1,300 Construction - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 300 1,000 1,300 Resources: User Fee - - - REET 75 769 844 Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 225 225 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income - - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 114 117 231 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 414 886 1,300 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 114 1 (114) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-16 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 10 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Fire Station 15 Construction and Apparatus Project Type: Development Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 6,562 Current LOS %Growth 100% Project Description: The City purchased property on 30th Street near 1-405 a number of years ago in anticipation of the need for an additional fire station to service the northwest side of the City. Since then,there has been a significant amount of development in the area,with more in the pipeline. Fire Station 15 would be"satellite station"size, namely three bays and roughly 7500 square feet. This Project Description also includes costs for a new piece of apparatus,the equipment for it,and equipment for the station,although those would not be funded through the CIP Fund. Roughly 7.5%of the project costs are for furnishings for the station. Soft costs have been estimated at 45%of the project total,which is common for a fire station. Additional operating expenses shown below represent annual utilities and building and grounds maintenance costs,but not full allocated costs. Summary of Progress: n 2013,circumstances allowed us to do a full site evaluation with a highly-experienced architectural firm to determine feasibilty,not only of the fire station itself,but for the Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - Construction 5,500 5,500 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management - - - Equipment Acquisition 412 650 1,062 Contingencies - - Total Expenses 5,912 650 6,562 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (5,912) (650)1 1 1 (6,562) Life to Date Estimated P r o j e c t e d Impact on Operating Funds Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 24 37 37 37 135 Net Operating Impact 24 37 37 37 135 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-17 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 11 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Accessible Playground Project Type: Development Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,274 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Design and construct a new playground with accessible structures for all ages and abilities. Design includes various play elements such as slides,swings and sensory equipment as well as rubberized safety surfacing,benches and drinking fountains. Public/private partnerships will be coordinated to raise matching funds. The site will be located on the North Highlands Neighborhood Center and Hillcrest Early Childhood Center properties. Impacts include labor,supplies,materials and utilities for the safe operation of the playground and restroom facilities. Summary of Progress: A partnership project with the Renton School District(RSD),Renton Rotary,other service clubs and individuals. In 2011,a Memorandum of Understanding with RSD Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - Construction 1,274 1,274 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 1,274 1,274 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating - - - Grants/Contribution Received 500 52 552 Mitigation Funds Received 700 - 700 Grants/Contribution Anticipated - - Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers 22 22 Interest Income - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance - 1,200 1,200 Total Resources 1,200 1,274 2,474 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (1,200) - I I I - I 1 (1,200) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 12 12 12 12 12 60 Net Operating Impact 12 12 12 12 12 60 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-18 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 12 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Riverview Park Bridge Reconstruction Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,173 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Riverview Park bridge connects the parking lot along SR 169 with the remainder of the park by spanning the Cedar River. The bridge was constructed using timber piles driven into the north and sound banks and into the middle of the river. The bridge piles have sustained flood damage over the years. Shifting piles,weather and high use have impacted the understructure of the bridge,the decking and the wooden handrails. This project removes the entire bridge and replaces it with a single-span metal bridge,eliminating the creosote-treated piles in the water and improving the aquatic ecosystem. Summary of Progress: A structural review and assessment of the Riverview Park bridge was completed in 2012. The report indicated further decay to the support timbers and Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - Construction 6 1,167 1,173 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - - Total Expenses 6 1,167 1,173 Resources: - User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received - - Grants/Contribution Anticipated 1,067 1,067 Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 6 100 106 Total Resources 6 1,167 1,173 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) - Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 3 3 3 3 3 15 Net Operating Impact 3 3 3 31 3 15 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-19 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 13 Importance Urgen Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Coulon Park Repairs and Maintenance Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 3,171 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Safety/infrastructure related projects to maintain heavily used park.The park is over 30 years old. *Coulon Park Structural Repairs[move 2014 funding($120,000)to paver replacement]. 2015/2016 repairs for pile cap/float&super-structure repairs *Coulon Park Pavers Repair (Recommend CF to complete repairs in 2015) *Coulon Park Lighting(CF unspent 2014 funding for waterwalk lighting) *Coulon Park Turf Replacement-2015 and 2016 South beach area *Coulon Park Shoreline Erosion(CF unspent 2014 funding for area b/n Ivars and North Shelter) *Coulon Park Five Year Structural Review-2016 *Coulon Park Parking Lot Repairs-(South parking lot-2016) *Coulon Park Irrigation System Replacement *Coulon Park South Beach Restroom and Concession stand/guard station/beach facility renovation(Facilities master plan and design 2016) CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Proposed P r o j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Adopted Coulon Park Structural Repairs 65 205 100 100 470 Coulon Park Lighting Repairs - 124 - - 110 - - - 234 Coulon Park Turf Replacement 6 55 50 50 50 50 50 50 361 Coulon Park Shoreline Erosion 14 91 55 - - - - - 160 Coulon Park 5-Year Structural Review - - - 125 125 Coulon Park Paver Replacement 453 - - 453 Coulon Park Irrigation System Replacemen - - 500 500 Coulon Park Parking Lot Repairs - 150 - 150 Coulon Park SB Restroom,Concession Stand 150 150 Coulon Park Log Replacement - 568 - - - - - - 568 Total Expenses 20 1,291 170 680 760 150 50 50 3,171 Resources: - User Fee - - - - - - - - - REET 170 192 362 Fuel Tax - - - - - Utility Tax 336 235 - 571 Business License Fee and B&O Tax 95 95 488 678 Bond Proceeds - - - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer M isc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 961 961 Total Resources 431 1,291 170 680 2,572 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 411 1 - (760) (150) (50) (50) (599) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Thru,2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35 Net Operating Impact 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35 *$27,000 is budgeted in Fund 504 for 2013 and 2014 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-20 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 14 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: City-wide Security System Upgrades Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 945 Current LOS 100% Growth Project Description: Because vandalism and graffiti repairs are a major drain on City resources,considerable cross-departmental effort has been made to reduce these property crimes. High-quality surveilance cameras and recording equipment is essential to efforts to prevent,discourage,and prosecute crimes of these types. Cameras are also important to the security of the transit center area downtown. The coordination of departmental efforts needs to also extend to equipment and software specification,placement,and replacement. Because video equipment continues to improve and fall in price,it will be possible to continue to upgrade the City's equipment without corresponding increases in cost. Many of the older surveilance cameras already in place are degraded and in need of replacement. Summary of Progress: The City purchased Pix Controler cameras in 2011 with a direct image emailing capacity that have been very effective in detering vandalism and graffiti. These are moved around the Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management - - - - - - - - - Equipment Acquisition 334 71 90 90 90 90 90 90 945 Contingencies - - - - - - - - TotalExpenses 334 71 90 90 90 90 90 90 945 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 90 60 150 Bond Proceeds - - - Operating - - Grants/Contribution Received 11 11 Mitigation Funds Received - - Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 90 90 180 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance 233 11 - - 244 Total Resources 334 71 90 90 585 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (90) (90) (90) (90) (360) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-21 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 15 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Irrigation Renovation,Automation and Conservation Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 984 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: As part of the Community Services Department's Water Conservation Plan and strategy,upgrading/replacing outdated irrigation systems&replacing solid state/battery operated irrigation controllers with computerized controllers&water saving devices will reduce water consumption/energy&provide more effective water delivery to parks,boulevards,public building grounds&transportation ROW projects. Overall costs will be reduced. An aging irrigation system with many repairs at Kiwanis Park will be replaced in 2016. Summary of Progress: In 2012/2013 irrigation automation was completed at the Transit Center,Burnett Avenue,Main Street parking lot and contract landscape maintenance locations. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - - - - - - Major Maintenance 159 15 250 265 265 15 15 984 Construction - - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 159 15 250 265 265 15 15 984 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax 15 250 265 Business License Fee and B&O Tax 30 - - 30 Bond Proceeds - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 129 - - 129 Total Resources 159 15 250 424 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (265) (265) (15) (15) (560) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016E2017: 2018 2019 2020 TotalRevenuelncrease/Decrease - - Expenditure Increase/Decrease (2 (2) (2) (2) (10) Net Operating Impact (2 (2) (2) (2) (10) Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-22 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 16 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Parks General Major Maintenance Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 7,014 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Major maintenance projects are necessary to maintain parks in a safe working order. Identified projects are listed below: *Playgrounds,Kiosks and Interpretive Signs-2015 Kiosk at Tiffany Park and replace the playground;2016 replace the playground at Philip Arnold Park *Light System Upgrades-2015 Highlands Park walkway;2016 Liberty Park *Shoreline and Bank Stabilization-2016 Jones Park *Boundary,Topographic and Site Surveys-2015 Kiwanis Park;2016 Tiffany Park *Fencing,Guardrails,Bullrails,Railings *Landscape Renovation and Repairs-2015 Heritage Park drainage and Maplewood Roadside drainage *Structural Reviews and Repairs-2015 trestle bridge repairs For a more detailed breakdown,refer to the following page. Summary of Progress: Estimated Project CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Total Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Expenditures: Major Maintenance Playgrounds,Kiosks and Intepretive Signs 11 266 120 120 120 120 120 120 997 Light System Upgrades 823 133 100 90 50 110 110 110 1,526 Shoreline and Bank Stabilization 61 100 - 250 250 200 2,000 - 2,861 Boundary,Topographic&Site Surveys 36 33 60 90 100 120 60 60 559 Fencing,Guardrails,Bullrails,Railings 33 - - - - - - - 33 Landscape Renovation&Repairs - 50 175 75 100 150 - 550 Structural Reviews and Repairs 320 18 100 - 25 - - 25 488 Total Expenses 1,284 600 555 550 620 650 2,440 315 7,014 Resources: - User Fee - - - - - - - - - REET 550 190 555 1,295 Fuel Tax - - - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 361 361 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 139 139 Misc/Transfers 734 - 734 Interest Income - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance - 410 - - 410 Total Resources 1,284 600 555 500 2,939 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (50) (620) (650) (2,440) (315) (4,075) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 14 14 14 14 14 70 Net Operating Impact 14 14 14 1 14 14 70 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-23 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0 0 ® Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Parks General Major Maintenance(continued) Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 7,014 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Major maintenance projects are necessary to maintain parks in a safe working order. Identified projects are listed below: *Playgrounds,Kiosks and Interpretive Signs-2015 Kiosk at Tiffany Park and replace the playground;2016 replace the playground at Philip Arnold Park *Light System Upgrades-2015 Highlands Park walkway;2016 Liberty Park *Shoreline and Bank Stabilization-2016 Jones Park *Boundary,Topographic and Site Surveys-2015 Kiwanis Park;2016 Tiffany Park *Fencing,Guardrails,Bullrails,Railings *Landscape Renovation and Repairs-2015 Heritage Park drainage and Maplewood Roadside drainage *Structural Reviews and Repairs-2015 trestle bridge repairs For a more detailed breakdown,refer to the following page. Summary of Progress: Major Maintenance Category/Description 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Playgrounds,Kiosks and Intepretive Signs Kiosk and Playground at Tiffany Park 120 Playground at Philip Arnold Park 120 Playground at Teasdale Park 120 Playground at Kiwanis Park 120 Playground at Earlington Park 120 Playgrounds,CR Trail,and Glencoe Park 120 Light System Upgrades Highlands Park 100 Liberty Park 90 Unidentified 50 110 110 110 Shoreline and Bank Stabilization Jones Park 250 CR Trail Des/Construction Docs 200 CR Trail Construction 2,000 Unidentified 250 Boundary,Topographic&Site Surveys Kiwanis Park 60 Tiffany Park 90 Honey Creek Philip Arnold 100 May Creek,Kennydale Lions 120 Unidentified 60 60 Landscape Renovation&Repairs Heritage Park 175 Study 75 Unidentified 100 150 Structural Reviews and Repairs Cedar River Trail Trestle Bridge 100 25 25 Total Parks Major Maintenance 555 550 6201 6501 2,4401 315 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-24 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 17 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Parking Lots and Drive Repairs Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 650 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Parking lot and driveway reconstruction activities to include resurfacing,sealcoating,patching,curb repairs/replacement,drainage improvements,and re-striping throughout the City's parks and municipal sites(e.g.downtown parking lot). The program is intended to maintain parking areas in a safe and accessible condition. Repairs are planned for parking lots at Teasdale Park and Houser Way in 2015;Cedar River Trail Park in 2016. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - - - - - - Major Maintenance 100 150 80 80 80 80 80 650 Construction - - - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 100 150 80 80 80 80 80 650 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 50 50 100 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 150 80 230 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 50 - - - - - - 50 Total Resources 50 100 150 80 - I380 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 50 1 - 1 (80) (80) (80) (80) (270) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-25 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 18 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Ball field Renovation Program Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 296 Current LOS 100% Growth Project Description: Ball fields require periodic major renovations to maintain the infrastructure and safety,increase playability and decrease staff time in field preparation. The scope generally includes field work such as drainage,grading,sodding or seeding,material replacement,backstop replacements and upgrades,player bench area repairs and upgrades,and bleacher upgrades and replacements. Impacts include a potential increase in revenue for demand to play on higher quality fields and increased playability during foul weather. In 2015 work is planned for the infield at Cedar River Park and at Kiwanis Park in 2016. Summary of Progress: In 2011,funds were used to provide safety upgrades to existing ballfield bleachers throughout the system. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition Consultant Services - - - - - - Major Maintenance 71 50 50 75 50 296 Construction - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - - - TotalExpenses 71 50 50 75 50 296 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 50 50 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer 50 50 Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 71 - - 71 Total Resources 71 50 50 171 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (75) (50) (125) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - 2 2 2 2 8 Expenditure Increase/Decrease 2 2 2 2 8 Net Operating Impact 4 4 4 4 16 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-26 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 19 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Paths,Walks,Patios and Boardwalks Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 868 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: ADA accessibility improvements and safety repairs and replacment to include heaving,broken,and settling pathways,trails,sidewalks,patios and boardwalks with asphalt,concrete,pavers,wood,or other materials in parks and trails. In 2015,the gravel pathway at Highlands Park will be paved to meet ADA guidelines and in 2016 repairs to the steps and sidewalk at Kennydale Beach will be completed. Summary of Progress: In 2013,ADA sidewalk installation at Teasdale Park and Cedar River Trail safety replacement near the Senior Center were completed. In 2014,ADA walk installation Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - - - - Major Maintenance 546 112 130 40 40 868 Construction - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 546 112 130 40 40 868 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - REET 75 75 Fuel Tax - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 75 75 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - - General Fund Transfer 130 40 170 Misc/Transfers 260 - - 260 Interest Income - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance 211 37 - - 248 Total Resources 546 112 130 40 828 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (40) (40) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-27 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 20 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Sports Court Repairs Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 563 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Safety repairs,replacement,resurfacing,reconstruction,seal-coating,patching,drainage improvements and re-striping existing surfaces at 17 tennis courts and 13 basketball courts throughout the system. Tennis courts at Kiwanis Park and basketball courts at Highlands Park are anticipated in 2015. In 2016,repairs to Coulon Park and Philip Arnold Park tennis courts are planned. Summary of Progress: The Ron Regis Park basketball court was resurfaced in 2013 and the Maplewood Park basketball court will be removed and replaced in 2014. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - - - - - Major Maintenance 74 59 150 80 50 50 50 50 563 Construction - - - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 74 59 150 80 50 50 50 50 563 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - REET 40 40 Fuel Tax - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 20 20 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 150 80 230 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 34 39 - - 73 Total Resources 74 59 150 80 363 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (50) (50) (50) (50) 200 Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-28 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 21 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Habitat Enhancement Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 100 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Funds are used to improve natural area habitats by assessing natural systems,developing recommendations for improvements,providing native plants,working with habitat restoration organizations and contractors,controlling invasive plant spread and monitoring to enhance wetland,river,lake,open space and forested areas of the city. This program maintains habitat monitoring requirements through plant replacements during the 5 year monitoring period and by preventing loss investments following the end of the monitoring period at 3 locations-May Creek Trail,Cedar River Gabions b/n Bronson and Logan and Riverview Park where monitoring is required. Summary of Progress: Habitat monitoring commenced along the May Creek Trail in 2013(through 2018)and will commence along the Cedar River Trails gabions in 2014(to 2020)and will Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - - - Major Maintenance 25 25 25 25 100 Construction - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 25 25 25 25 100 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (25) (25) (25) (25) (100) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-29 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 22 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Tree Maintenance Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 2,662 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Community Services maintains trees citywide as part of the Urban Forestry Program. Public health,safety&welfare are paramount&account for most expenditures(high risk tree removal/pruning). $250,000 in 2015&2016 will be used to continue removal of high risk trees and prune trees utilizing contracted tree service companies. ROW Trees/Sidewalk Safety Repairs addresses public safety when trees begin to displace sidewalks and utilzes a combination of City crews and contractors.Scheduled work includes Park Avenue N(2015)and North 3rd St. (2016)."Tree Planting"replaces removed trees/plants trees in new locations utilizing volunteers,crews and contracted services. Summary of Progress: 2013-sidewalk/tree repairs along Bronson Way N,Main Ave.S.and SE 168th St. 2014-Sidewalk repairs planned on Logan Ave S,Burnett Ave.S and SE Petrovitsky Road.Safety related tree removals and pruning at multiple locations under 3 separate contracts. Progress Summary: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year end Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Major Maintenance Tree Safety Pruning and Removal 611 261 215 215 250 250 250 250 2,302 ROW Trees/Sidewalk Safety Repairs - - 35 35 35 35 35 35 210 Tree Planting 25 25 25 25 25 25 150 Construction - - - - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition - - - - - - - - - TotalExpenses 611 261 275 275 310 310 310 310 2,662 Resources: - User Fee - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax 15 100 - - 115 Business License Fee and B&O Tax - - 275 211 486 Bond Proceeds - - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers 117 117 Interest Income - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance 479 161 - - 640 Total Resources 611 261 275 211 1,358 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (0) (64) (310) (310) (310) (310) (1,304) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Totals Revenue Increase/Decrease Expenditure Increase/Decrease - Net Operating Impact - - - - Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-30 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 23 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Transportation Landscape Improvements Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 750 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Funds the design and construction of new landscaping and irrigation improvements whenever an existing city street is being designed and constructed with specific transportation grant funding that does not allow the use of irrigation. Street ROW landscaping enhances community livability,improves water quality,diffuses heat,slows traffic,and increases the economic value of the surrounding area. Summary of Progress: This is a Placeholder for TIB grant funded projects that disallows irrigation. In 2015 and beyond,landscape improvements on Logan Avenue will not include Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - - - - - Consultant Services 25 25 50 50 50 50 250 Major Maintenance 50 50 100 100 100 100 500 Construction - - - - - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 75 75 150 150 150 150 750 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax 75 75 150 Business License Fee and B&O Tax - - - Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 75 75 150 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (150) (150) (150) (150) (600) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-31 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 24 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Senior Center Kitchen Remodel Project Type: Construction and Remodel Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 960 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The Senior Center kitchen is very heavily used. All of the existing appliances need to be replaced. There are some adjacency and work flow shortcomings with the current layout. The walk-in freezer and cooler need to be relocated to improve efficiency and capacity for larger events. The janitor closet is also in an awkward location that needs more separation for health and safety improvement purposes. There is a small building footprint extension involved with this project. Summary of Progress: We used Clevenger Associates,a well-known commercial kitchen design firm,to help us create the project scope and equipment evaluation a number of years ago. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 40 40 Major Maintenance - - - Construction 845 845 Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - Project Management - - Equipment Acquisition 75 75 Contingencies - - TotalExpenses 40 920 960 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 40 40 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - Total Resources 40 40 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (920)1 1 1 1 (920) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-32 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 25 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Matching Funds for Renton History Museum Lobby Renovation Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 30 Current LOS %Growth 100% Project Description: The Renton History Museum is located in the City-owned 1942 Renton Fire Station No.1,a historic building that was constructed as Renton's first dedicated fire station.The Museum's 166 sq ft lobby welcomes about 3,500 visitors a year;it is the welcoming place for all visitors and researchers,the staging point for school tours,and also serves as the Museum's small gift shop.The lobby's fixtures and finishes have not been updated since the building was converted for use as a museum 30 years ago.Interviews with members of the public during the Museum Master Plan process revealed that the public finds the lobby"cramped"and"out-of-date,"and fundraising consultants The Collins Group gave the"highest priority"to"making capital improvements to increase visibility and demonstrate progress"before a capital campaign begins.The Collins Group determined that improving the lobby is"a pre-requisite to expanding the museum's audience and position in the community." The Renton Historical Society proposes to update and refresh the lobby to create a more intuitive traffic pattern for visitors;improve the appearance of the lobby and obscure unattractive office areas;and introduce Renton history using video,audio,and historic objects.These improvements would include:refreshing paint,floor covering,and fixtures;install energy-efficient lighting;update electrical and wifi connections for a point-of-sale system and interactives;and replace non-ADA compliant doors.In addition,the lobby will be reconfigured as a better space for an introduction to the history of Renton,with space for changing banners,a video screen for films and slide shows,and cases to showcase objects. The Facilities Department is reouestine 515,000 matchine funds of the total 530,000 cost of the proiect,which would cover time and materials for this proiect in a Citv-owned Summary of Progress: A committee of the Renton Historical Society Board of Trustees,Facilities and other City staff,and community members spent six months in 2012 formulating the Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - Major Maintenance 30 30 Construction - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 30 30 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax - - Utility Tax 15 15 Business License Fee and B&O Tax - - Bond Proceeds Operating - - Grants/Contribution Received 2 2 Mitigation Funds Received - - Grants/Contribution Anticipated 14 14 Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - Total Resources 30 30 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated P r o j e c t e d Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-33 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 26 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Henry Moses Aquatic Center Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,657 Current LOS 100% Growth Project Description: The 5.2 million Henry Moses Aquatic Center opened for the summer season in 2004. It contains a lap pool,a lazy river,slides,and water features,as well as a toddler area. Not all water features that were part of the original design were put in at the time of construction. Each year,if pool revenues exceed expenses by$120,000,that excess revenue will be used towards fully developing the initially planned features,and update equipment and decor. Currently,expenses have not been exceeding revenues,but other repairs and improvements have been made. In 2010,roughly$50,000 was spent on drain alterations to meet the requirements of the Virginia Graham Baker Act, which was developed to limit the force of suction at the recirculation intake grates. Summary of Progress: The Henry Moses Aquatic Center opens after the Memorial Day weekend,and runs through Labor Day. Issues with cracks or fractures in the Lap Pool gutter wall were resolved Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Year End Adopted P r o j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - - - - - - - Construction 831 106 120 120 120 120 120 120 1,657 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - - - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 831 106 120 120 120 120 120 120 1,657 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - REET 85 60 145 Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 35 35 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 120 120 240 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance 711 46 - - 757 Total Resources 831 106 120 120 1,177 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (120) (120) (120) (120) (480) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-34 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 27 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Renton Community Center Improvements Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 120 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The Reception counter at the Community Center does not incorporate ADA design,re-design and implementation proposed for 2016($25k). The roof ridge needs to be extended to prevent leaks($24,000);the locker rooms need to be reconfigured with more benches and few lockers due to a change in use patterns($13,000). In addition,various equipment has been worn and need to be replaced:gym bleachers($18,000),event carpeting($20,000),folding banquet tables with worn locking mechanisms($20,000) Summary of Progress: Life to Date Estimated P r o j e c t e d CIP Expenditures&Resources Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - Construction 62 62 Contribution to 1%for Art - - Inspection Project Management - - Equipment Acquisition 58 58 Contingencies - TotalExpenses 120 120 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer 120 120 Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - Total Resources 120 120 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Life to Date Estimated P r o j e c t e d Impact on Operating Funds Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-35 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 28 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: City Hall Lobby Remodel Project Type: Remodel and Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $250,000 $ 500 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The current configuration of the RCH lobby is not particularly user-friendly. Volunteer staff is tucked into a detent in the wall and are not obviously there to support visitors. There are many days of the year when the wind blows through the lobby every time a door is opened. The door systems are worn and difficult to maintain. The lighting and finishes are dated. The new configuration would add an airlock extending under the building overhang to the west,provide a centrally-located reception desk area for the volunteers,update building messaging,the lighting and the finishes. The glass door system would be replaced with a more functional storefront assembly. This project would also include minor modifications to the hallway and entry to the Mayor's Office on the 7th floor,making the entry more obvious and welcoming by removal of some false wall areas and using a glass entry with sidelights. Summary of Progress: The project was designed several years ago,but postponed for budgetary reasons. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - Construction 250 250 500 Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - TotalExpenses 250 250 500 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (250) (250)1 1 1 (500) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 14 14 14 14 14 70 Net Operating Impact 14 14 14 14 14 70 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-36 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 29 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: City Hall Carpet Replacement Project Type: Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $500,000 $ 500 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The City has occupied City Hall since 1998 and the carpet is original. While it has been cleaned and maintained regularly with specialized equipment,it is showing a lot of wear,particularly in high traffic,public acceess areas. We have no more replacement squares to substitute in worn areas. The original carpet was installed before the systems furniture was placed,at an installed cost of$37 per yard. Replacement carpet installation can be performed with the furniture remaining in place by specialized installers,although it is necessarily more complex than an open space installation. We have roughly 10,000 square yards in place on the six floors that the City occupies. We used a place holder of$50 per installed yard on the basis of a slightly higher quality(denser weave)carpet tile,but costs vary significantly within a typical range of$37-$70 per installed yard. There have been significant technological improvements in carpet fibers and manufacturing techniques in the last decade,so better quality and ease of cleaning can be expected with a new installation. This project can be divided into segments if necessary, but an extended installation of several years will affect the price. Summary of Progress: Life to Date Estimated P r o j e c t e d CIP Expenditures&Resources Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - Construction 250 250 500 Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - TotalExpenses 250 250 500 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (250) (250)1 1 1 (500) Life to Date Estimated P r o j e c t e d Impact on Operating Funds Year End Adopted Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 14 14 14 14 14 70 Net Operating Impact 14 14 14 14 14 70 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-37 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 30 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: City Hall Roof Project Type: Remodel and Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 380 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The roof on City Hall is original to the building(1986)and has exceeded the normal life expectancy for a roof of its type by 9 years. It was properly installed and has been well-maintained over the years. The roof is inspected quarterly and tested weekly when it is lightly flooded as part of the sprinkler system testing program. (ROM ESTIMATE) Summary of Progress: Traffic pads were replaced a number of years ago. These pads prevent potential leaks from roof-top worker damage. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 5 5 Major Maintenance - - Construction 375 375 Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 380 380 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (380)1 1 1 1 (380) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 14 14 14 14 14 70 Net Operating Impact 14 14 14 14 14 70 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-38 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 31 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Building Permit Area Reconfiguration Project Type: Remodel and Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 280 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: The Permit division of CED needs a major reconfiguration to allow improved public access and staff support. This area on the Sixth Floor of City Hall has maintained its original layout(1999)while the procedures and methods for permit review have changed entirely. Rather than expedite services,the front counter is a pinch point for customers. Applicants should have direct access to the various types of permit reviewers,there should be a number of kiosks for on-line permit application,and staff will serve the public better by providing technical support for the on-line process. Most of the other municipalities in the area are already responding to public service in this way. The area of reconfiguration would be the existing self-help area-which is still oriented to paper-based materials;all of the cubicles along the west wall of the area,the front desk area,and the mylar storage/reproduction area. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 30 30 Major Maintenance - - - Construction 150 100 250 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - TotalExpenses 180 100 280 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 180 100 280 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 180 100 280 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-39 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 32 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Community Services Maintenance Shops Rehab Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 573 Current LOS 100% Growth 0% Project Description: The original intent was to replace the three existing maintenance shops with a new combined Maintenance Shop. Maintenance of the existing shops was deferred. It now appears that we will be using these shops for some time and the maintenance can no longer be put off. The scope of work for these buildings involves roof replacement(two of the three are recent),HVAC equipment replacement,lighting upgrades,replacement furnishings,new flooring and finishes. The energy-related portions of this work will qualify for partial funding by PSE grants. The maintenance shop on Bronson Way also requires some landscape and appearance upgrades to meet the zoning standards. It currently operates under an annually-renewed temporary operating permit. Summary of Progress: The Facilities Shop and the North Parks Shop had their HVAC systems upgraded in 2011.The same year,both buildings were repainted.In 2012,the Facilities Shop received a new roof.The North Parks Shops Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 223 100 160 90 573 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 223 100 160 90 573 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 100 100 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - - General Fund Transfer 160 90 250 Misc/Transfers - - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - Beginning Fund Balance 223 100 - - 323 Total Resources 323 100 160 90 673 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 100 Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016E2017: 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenuelncrease/Decrease - - - - - - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease (5 (5) Net Operating Impact (5 (5) Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-40 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 33 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Public Works Sign Shop Expansion Project Type: Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 182 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Growth in workload has created a need for additional floor space for the sign shop. The construction would be a simple steel panel construction with minimal partitions,windows and doors. It would be a single story addition to the side of the existing sign shop in the Public Works complex. Summary of Progress: A basic design was providing for preliminary estimating,and the figure shown is based on unit cost pricing for buildings of its type. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - Construction 182 182 Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 182 182 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 81 81 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer 101 101 Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - TotalResources 182 182 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End AdoptedP r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenuelncrease/Decrease - - - - - - - - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 Net Operating Impact 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-41 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 34 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Leased Facilities Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,467 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: The recent history of this account is this: we completed an architectural,energy,structural,seismic,and mechanical review of the 200 Mill Building(Old City Hall)in 2008. Costs were high relative to the market value of the building,so we will continue to lease space in the building and make improvements and updates as necessary,using grant money wherever possible. In 2009,we used a Federal(EECBG)grant and a PSE energy grant that provided all of the funding to make the substantial HVAC upgrade that was indicated in the 2008 review. In fact the original system was nearing collapse. Our occupancy rate has fallen in the meanwhile, and we have not replaced the tenants. The building has been marketed and shown quite a bit. Our failure to land new tenants may be partly attributed to a cluttered appearance of the available suites as they were abandoned intact;outdated bathrooms,which are not ADA compliant;and lobbies with worn carpet and finishes on those floors having vacancies. We also know that the roof needs to be replaced($180,000 est.)but that will have to wait until the performance of this account improves. Summary of Progress: In addition to the improvements shown above,in 2009,the first floor lobby and restrooms were updated to ADA standards and to meet the needs of the first floor Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year end Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - - Major Maintenance 1,263 204 1,467 Construction - - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - Total Expenses 1,263 204 1,467 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds - - - Operating 529 204 733 Grants/Contribution Received 734 - 734 Mitigation Funds Received - - Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - Total Resources 1,263 204 1,467 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-42 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 35 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Downtown Wayfinding Project Type: Development Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 621 Current LOS 100%Growth Project Description: Signage to provide clear,consistent directions for auto and pedestrian traffic to various destinations,attractions,and landmarks. A wayfinding system may include gateway features,directional signs,kioks,and banners in a unified manner,enhancing the area's unique identity and creating artistic elements in Downtown. The system will help residents,employees,businesses,and visitors feel more comfortable and confident about coming to and navigating around Downtown,whether it is for shopping,dining,culture,and/or entertainment. Before implementation,there will be a review,update of the previously approved signage to ensure they still meet the needs of downtown redevelopment. Summary of Progress: Design of the entire wayfinding system was completed in 2008. Fabrication and installation of the system's Phase I occurred in 2009,and consisted of advance directional signs to lin Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 171 100 100 250 621 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 171 100 100 250 621 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET 39 39 Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax 154 154 Business License Fee and B&O Tax - - Bond Proceeds - - Operating 171 171 Grants/Contribution Received - - Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 7 7 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - - - Total Resources 171 161 39 371 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 61 1 (61) (250)1 1 1 1 (250) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-43 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 36 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Benson/Cascade Park Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 250 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Master planning and preliminary environmental assessment for a future park and community center in the Benson Hill neighborhood in the vicinity of the Cascade Shopping Center as identified in the Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. Summary of Progress: This project was identified as a citywide#5 priority in the Parks,Recreation,and Natural Areas Plan(2011). Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 250 250 Major Maintenance - - Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 250 250 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (250)1 1 1 1 (250) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-44 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 37 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Parks,Recreation and Open Space Plan Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 338 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: The Parks,Recreation,and Natural Areas Plan is a 20-year vision for parks,recreation facilities,programming and natural areas. The Plan describes current and future needs and identifies policies,implementation strategies and an investment program for a livable community and is the blueprint for planning,acquisition and development. In order to maintain WWRP grant eligibility(and other grant sources),the Plan needs to be updated every six years. This budget request is to refresh the plan,including a new statistically valid survey. It will take one year to update the current plan which expires in 2017. Summary of Progress: The Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Plan was completed and adopted by City Council in 2011. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 213 125 338 Major Maintenance - - - Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - TotalExpenses 213 125 338 Resources: User Fee - - - REET 175 175 Fuel Tax - - Utility Tax - - Business License Fee and B&O Tax 125 125 Bond Proceeds - - Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 38 - 38 Total Resources 213 125 338 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) (0) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-45 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 38 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Park Master Planning Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 360 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Park master planning is needed for undeveloped parks,under-developed park areas,and for developed parks that are becoming outdated. Assessing park, recreation,and open space needs of the community,and translating that information into a framework for meeting the physical,spatial,and facility requirements to satisfy those needs,describes the goals of the park master planning process. Park master planning is done at the individual park level and guides park development in subsequent years. Summary of Progress: This item was introduced in 2008 and is included as recommendations for identified park facilities in the adopted Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan(2011). Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance - - - - - Construction 90 90 90 90 360 Contribution to 1%for Art - - - - - Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - - - - TotalExpenses 90 90 90 90 360 Resources: User Fee - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (90) (90) (90) (90) (360) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-46 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 39 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Integrated Pest Management Program Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 100 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: Integrated pest management(IPM)is the concept of managing pests through a hierarchy of choices,the first being the least toxic approach in an effort to reduce the use of chemical controls. While the Community Services Department is practicing IPM,the department has no formal program to date. A formal program will bring effectiveness of IPM practices to the department and demonstrate leadership to the public in the control of weeds and other pests using the least toxic alternatives available. Summary of Progress: This is being re-programmed to 2017 at which time a consultant will be hired to work with staff in developing an Integrated Pest Management Program plan. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - Consultant Services 100 100 Major Maintenance - - Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies - TotalExpenses 100 100 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (100)1 1 1 1100 Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-47 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 40 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Trails and Bike Master Plan Project Type: Remodel&Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 50 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Update to the adopted 2009 Trails and Bike Master Plan which expires in 2016.In order to maintain WWRP grant eligibility,the plan is required to be updated and certified every six years. The City also uses the plan to obtain KC Conservation Futures and transportation grants.Public Works to contribute 50%of the$100,000 cost for consultant services.The adopted Parks,Recreation and Natural Areas Plan;City Center Community Plan;and the Benson Hill Community Plan recommend implementing the Trails and Bicycle Plan. Policy language(per the Citywide Comprehensive Plan Update),community planning areas,a demand and needs analysis and new trails such as the East Side Trail Corridor are elements that are currently not included in the existing plan. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - - - Consultant Services 50 50 Major Maintenance - - Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 50 50 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated - - General Fund Transfer 50 50 Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance - Total Resources 50 50 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-48 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 41 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Capital Project Coordination Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 960 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: To reimburse Parks capital project planning,coordination,and management costs paid by Fund 001. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection - - - - - - - - - Project Management 332 75 81 85 90 94 99 104 960 Equipment Acquisition - - - - - - - - - Contingencies - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 332 75 81 85 90 94 99 104 960 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax - - - Utility Tax 75 81 - 156 Business License Fee and B&O Tax 80 80 Bond Proceeds - Operating - - - Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers - - Interest Income 5 5 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 332 - - - 332 Total Resources 332 75 81 85 573 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 1 (0) (90) (94) (99) (104) (387) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-49 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 42 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Limited Term Capital Project Coordinator Project Type: Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: New two year,regular,full-time,limited term position that will assist staff with the back log of safety and infra-structure-related capital improvement projects. The back-log is primarily due to the location of the projects along major bodies of water,federal/state/county/local/tribal regulatory and permitting requirements, environmental constraints and the related time required to work through environmental processes. The position will administer consultant&construction contracts,coordinate project design&construction elements,manage the public bid process including performing the bid analysis,process change order requests, perform inspection of projects under construction,review payment requests and perform project closeout. Operating impacts include supplies for office set up and annual maintenance. Summary of Progress: Temporarily replaces Capital Project Coordinator position eliminated in 2005. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses Resources: User Fee REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-50 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 43 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Limited Term Certified Arborist Project Type: Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Increased demand by Renton residents,City departments and outside organizations regarding safety-related tree requests and information has occured since Council's approval of the Urban and Community Forestry Development Plan(2009).An outside contractor was hired during 2013 to inspect requests for service backlogged from 2010 and to prioritize safety-related work including hazard tree removals. During 2013/2014,an additional 600 requests for service were received, inspected or completed involving over 3,000 trees. This new limited term position will assist staff with back-logged work and receiving requests,performing tree inspections,prioritizing safety-related work and processing work orders citywide. Summary of Progress: Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses Resources: User Fee REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-51 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 44 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Grant Matching Program Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 211 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: The City annually appropriates funds to the Community Services Department to be available for unforeseen building facility,park and/or trail development or acquisition opportunities,or to be available to leverage grant monies from agencies such as King County Conservation Futures,Washington Recreation and Wildlife Program(WWRP),or the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Expenditure of these monies must have specific Council approval. Summary of Progress: In 2014,$38,817 was identified to offset potential increased expenditures related to the FEMA Grant for the Cedar River Gabion Repair Project. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services - - Major Maintenance 211 211 Construction - - Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses 211 211 Resources: User Fee - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - Beginning Fund Balance 211 211 Total Resources 211 211 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-52 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 45 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: Disaster Repairs Project Type: Remodel&Construction Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: Unpredictable events occur that result in significant repair costs to the Community Services Department's assets.Project funds are used for disaster events whenever damage occurs. Events such as floods,windstorms,earthquakes,and the like require an immediate response to make repairs and restore pre-existing conditions. Summary of Progress: The Cedar River Gabion Project was approved for construction in 2014(2009 flood damage). 5 years of habitat monitoring to 2020 is required. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition Contingencies Total Expenses Resources: User Fee REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease 8 8 8 8 8 38 Net Operating Impact 8 8 8 81 8 38 Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-53 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 46 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: 2007 KC Levy Fund Project Type: Acquisition Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 1,112 Current LOS % Growth Project Description: King County voters approved a six-year levy for open space and trail acquisition and development through 2013. The funds may specifically include local trails in underserved areas linking to city or county trails that connect regional trails and for open space acquisition in areas where the City is trying to acquire missing parcels as part of a larger network of open spaces. The funding will be allocated to appropriate eligible projects. Summary of Progress: During 2013,$427,432 was expended for the May Creek Trail construction,the Tiffany/Cascade Park Connector, the Cedar River Trail turn-back and parcel Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition 653 653 Consultant Services - - Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition - - Earmarked - 459 459 Total Expenses 653 459 11112 Resources: User Fee - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 2007 KC levy Prop 2 1,112 - 1,112 Beginning Fund Balance - 459 459 Total Resources 1 1,1121 459 11,571 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) 459 1 - I (459) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-54 AGENDA ITEM #2. c) GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM Project Number: 47 ® 0 I ® ® I I 0 • 0• I Importance Urgency Combined Project Priority Score: + - Priority Ranking: Project Title: 2013 KC Proposition 1 Parks Levy Fund Project Type: Development and Major Maintenance Total Anticipated Project Cost: $ 591 Current LOS Growth 100% Project Description: King County voters approved a six-year levy for the repair,replacement,improvement,and expansion or acquisition of parks,open space,trails and recreation opportunities. The funding will be allocated to appropriate eligible projects and the maintenance and operating costs will be incorporated in these projects when funded. Funding under this project will continue from 2014 through 2019. Summary of Progress: Funds continue to be collected for 2014 with a total of$197,771 by year's end less KC administration fees. Estimated CIP Expenditures&Resources Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Expenditures: Property Acquisition - Consultant Services Major Maintenance Construction Contribution to 1%for Art Inspection Project Management Equipment Acquisition - - - - - - Earmarked,KC Levy 197 (197) 197 197 197 591 Total Expenses 197 (197) 197 197 197 591 Resources: User Fee - - - - - - REET Fuel Tax Utility Tax Business License Fee and B&O Tax Bond Proceeds Operating Grants/Contribution Received Mitigation Funds Received Grants/Contribution Anticipated Mitigation Funds Anticipated General Fund Transfer Misc/Transfers Interest Income 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Used - - - - - - 2013 KC levy Prop 1 Unused 197 (197) 197 197 197 591 2007 KC levy Prop 2 Unused - - - - - - Beginning Fund Balance - - - - - Total Resources 197 (197) 197 197 197 591 Balance Available/(Unfunded Needs) Estimated Impact on Operating Funds Life to Date Year End Adopted P r a j e c t e d Project Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Increase/Decrease - Expenditurelncrease/Decrease Net Operating Impact Capital Investment Program-General Government 5-55 AGENDA ITEM#2, d) 2016 CIP Budget With Proposed(2015)Carry Forwards and 2016 Budget Adjustments 2016 Budget Adj. Budget Adj. '4'"dvfapF.3c i/sfcd Line Item Acquisition and Development Adopted 2015 C . 1 2 riniring (GL Account No.) Coulon Park Acquisition Opportunity 1,000,000 1,000,000 316.332052.020.594.76.61.000 Grant Matching Program 0 250,000 250,000 316.332011.020.594.76.61.000 May Creek,Fawcett East Acq. 0 0 316.332001.020.594.76.61.000 May Creek,Fawcett South "0, U o' 0 268 268 316.33????.020.594.76.61.000 Cook Property/May Creek Acquisition 0 0 Fletcher Acquisition ., o, 1 0 .r 0 0 316.332056.020.594.76.61.000 Kenyon-Dobson Park 0 0 316.332049.020.594.76.61.000 Kenyon-Dobson Park i uit, I 2016 120000tt.i,IitI-V I,rnpco„,d d ,rrnl&,016 r62,M0 tr.,Sh.id i i,,,d,o dI I i a,-,t,r i i,r,rAW,,train C.id.,I„ 182,500 56,960 57,405 296,865 316.332049.020.594.76.63.000 2007 KC Prop 2 Parks Levy 0 6,630 6,630 316.332029.020.594.76.61.000 2014 KC Proposition 1 Parks Levy 0 0 316.332050.020.594.76.61.000 Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion v,, 0 489,108 489,108 316.332003.020.594.76.63.000 North ig an s Park Improvements , ,< - ,91,oa 1, r r:,nr Ao- hb ivn,l,,),rrr,ni,d) 80,000 249,639 9,563 339,202 316.332051.020.594.76.63.000 Piazza Master Plan&Redevelopment k 0 v, •e, ,, rr, 300,000 100,000 400,000 316.332053.020.594.76.63.000 arty ar mprovements w e 1,000,000 561,972 1,561,972 316.332054.020.594.76.63.000 Accessible Playground(i„nrnr r,nr ,,, 0 91563 ),031 0 316.332035.020.594.76.63.000 Urban Forestry Program ,r 3,8701 ,870 316.332017.020.576.81.41.003 Sunset EIS Park ),, , ,,n ,,, ..sr _,r„,r,a , ,., ,d 300,000 510,685 810,685 316.332043.020.594.76.63.000 Total Development 2,862,500 2,238,695 57,405 0 5,158,600 Major Maintenance Parks General Major Maintenance Projects 1. Playgrounds,Kiosks&Interpretive Signage n'r ., 0 316.332022.020.594.76.63.000 0 2. Light System Upgrades 90,000 1,734 91,734 316.332023.020.594.76.63.000 3. Shoreline&Bank Stabilization(r ;i�',,k anrd ^;0.000 rrni,dr d r ,: ,dnr r ih M rk a, 137,500 100,000 237,500 316.332024.020.594.76.63.000 M2 1,00 ri ern nd rn i<nil iri,d,:,i,anro) 4a. Boundary,Topographic&Site Survey-Existing Properties _. 90,000 55,177 145,177 316.332025.020.576.81.41.000 Boundary,Topographic&Site Survey-New Properties 0 316.332025.020.594.76.63.000 5. Fencing,Guardrails,Bullrails&Railings 0 0 316.332026.020.594.76.63.000 6. Landscape Renovation/Repairs r 179,522 179,522 316.332027.020.576.81.48.000 7a. Structural Reviews 29,799 29,799 316.332028.020.576.81.41.000 7b. Structural Repairs 0 316.332028.020.576.81.48.000 8. Riverview Bridge Replacement✓, 0 157,4371 157,437 316.332041.020.594.76.63.000 Coulon Park 9a. 5-Year Structural Review125,000 125,000 316.332045.020.576.81.41.017 9b. Parking Lot Repairs(i„drnr n,201,Ci-d2016 0,dgnr e r,n,i,k,q t.ur-d it n r np,ntrd/ 150,000 124,808 274,808 316.332045.020.576.81.48.013 9c. Trestle Bridge Repair 0 0 316.332045.020.576.81.48.020 9d. Structural Repairs 205,000 65,000 270,000 316.332045.020.594.76.63.010 9e. Tennis Courts,r,,.rn n..,1, ,2or,h,1,,,c d,n.as 0 6,248 L?4H1 0 316.332045.020.594.76.63.011 9f. Lighting Repairs 0 0 316.332045.020.594.76.63.012 9g. Turf Replacement i ,rrnr-P2011,0 t',r.aa;r i<,,I,„trnh-,,/ 50,000 57,405 v 4051 50,000 316.332045.020.594.76.63.014 9h. South Beach Resroom/Concession/Guard station renovation 150,0001 150,000 316.332045.020.594.76.63.015 9i. Shoreline Erosion(h i)lv ir,o,ir9,it lh,holtor) i 0 316.332045.020.594.76.63.016 9j. Paver Replacement 0 83,950 83,950 316.332045.020.594.76.63.018 9k. Dolphins/Camel Logs Replacement 01 0 316.332045.020.594.76.63.019 91. Trestle Bride Repair i 01 0 316.332045.020.576.76.63.020 Parks General Major Maintenance Subtotal 997,500 736,272 61,155 0 1,794,927 .................. ......... .......................... .......................... ......... .......................... ........................ ......... ............................. ....�......................... ......... ......................... .......................... ......... .......................... ..... Irri anon Automation,Renovation and Conservation 0 15,000 0 15,000 316 332010 020 556 81 35000 Irrigation design/renovation of existing older systems 1,Improve water conservation,Irzigetion conirollers/sentinel units-(I:I„t tllt h!20f09.t'40,000 t, .,,t lI',it,) Parking Lot and Drive Repairs: .rr,,.rn r,nr 2016 hndd oan.ono a ci ran.onnrn Coulon r'm k P,,k,p 1 Hahnh,,/ 80,000 44,808 l'124 8081 0 316.332008.020.576.81.48.000 Replacement,patching,sealcoating(&atter striping),curb repiecement end island renovation;landscaping 1,perking lots and drives. Ballfield Renovation Program 50,000 50,000 100,000 316.332030.020.594.76.63.000 Pathway,Sidewalk,Patio&Boardwalk Repairs r r 40,000 40,059 80,059 316.332009.020.594.76.63.000 Sid awelk/peth/trail replacement,repair or patching,new walk 1,replace grevel/espheli.AOA upgrades Sport Court Repairs),.. o/ r- 80,000 12,558 6,248 98,806 316.332007.020.594.76.63.000 ,dudes repair end replacement of hem rd,mil aorta..courts Coude Tree Maintenance/Urban Forestry Plan Implementation rn r. .. 275,000 117,518 392,518 316.332012.020.576.81.41.003 >e. ©. ,: Special Pmpec Plamingr Prune trees using comrectors end ramal eq,ipmem Transportation Landscape Maintenance >r- ( 75,000 75,000 150,000 316.332055.020.594.70.63.000 Parks,Recreation and NaturalAreas Plain 125,000 316.332002.020.5 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan ,', 50,000 50,000 316.332044.020.576.81.41.010 Limited Term Capital Project Coordinator(2 Year Limited Term Position) 125,583 125,583 Capital Project Coordination 85,000 85,000 316.000000.020.594.76.91.010 Disaster Repairs 200,000 200,000 316.330033.020.594.76.63.000 Cedar River Gabion Repairs-FEMA" 0 Ol 316.332042.020.594.76.63.000 Subtotal Parks Maintenance 935,583 604,943 iiil 1,560) 0 1,421,966 7- Total 2016 Development+2016 Major Maintenance 4,795,583 3,579,910 0 0 8,375,493 (including Proposed Carry Forward Amounts and 2016 Budget Adjustments) ****King County Knotweed Grant-$189,280 Acct#001.332040.020.576.11.41.010 CF.-,$136,100.36 H 1PARKSwKS Secretary12016 Fil-CIP Budget12016 CIP Budget with 2015 OF&2016 Budget Ad) Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM #2. Fund 504-Facilities Fund Working Document,Awaiting Carry Forwards 2015 2016 Total Anticipated 2015-2016 Major Maintenance Cost: $405,000 $343,000 Operational Facilities Major Maintenance Projects: Fire Station No.11(Built 1978): $13,000 $13,000 Ongoing maintenance issues are lower than typical for an older station as it was updated in 2009. However,the generator was not replaced at the time and is not large enough to support full operations during a power outage. Generator replacement is a CIP proposal for 2015. Fire Station 12: $15,000 $15,000 We corrected issues with the building's exterior envelope in the previous budget cycle,resulting in energy savings.The equipment and backup systems for the Emergency Control Center,which is quite large,are important to maintain at the schedules recommended in the O&M Manual. Fire Station No.13: $10,000 $10,000 Interior and exterior painting is intended to maintain a relatively high aesthetic of this building,which is a headquarter-type fire station serving the south end of the City. Exterior CMU block sealing prevents degradation of the CMU masonry system by shutting off water intrusion from the exterior. It also eliminates spalling due to a freeze-thaw cycle. Fire Station No.14(Built 1997): $10,000 $10,000 Worn carpet replacement in the training & administrative areas is planned for 2015. Building hardware is also at the age and conditon to require replacement. Fire Station No.16(Remodeled 1997): $12,000 $12,000 Carpet replacement is planned for 2015. Upgrading uninsulated windows will improve the energy efficiency and integrity of the building envelope. Fire Station No.17 $12,000 $12,000 The City is responsible for facility and landscape maintenance as part of the contracted services agreement with King County Fire District 40. The Fire District is responsible for major repairs(incidents over$5,000). City Shops: $20,000 $20,000 We have experienced an increasing level of maintenance repair as this facility ages. Operational changes will also require facility alterations. For example, there is an expansion of the Sign Shop proposed in the CIP. Electrical redistribution will allow us to put power where it is now needed without adding another transformer and an additional service feed from PSE. Public Facilities Major Maintenance Projects: City Hall: $80,000 $80,000 A variety of small projects are requested annually($30,000)in response to public access and technology changes, There is some potential recovery of cost from PSE energy savings matches to replace two original hot water boilers(HVAC)($30,000),but rebates change periodically and cannot always be planned on. Renton Community Center: $40,000 $40,000 Major maintenance has an allowance of$25,000 annually which includes items like the gym floor annual refinishing.($13,000),bathroom finishes and wood trim replacement.Banquet room tables are scheduled for replacement in 2015($20,000). Major painting and staining is planned($40,000)to provide an updated appearance. Senior Activity Center: $95,000 $33,000 Our summer major maintenance shutdown program costs$25,000 annually. The office and public counter need to be reconfigured to be ADA accessible. It should be noted that the ceiling the replacement and lighting upgrades in the auditorium,funded for 2014,will be carried forward to 2015 because of the extended length of time necessary to perform this work. Any funds left over in 2015 will be carried forward for the upgrade project. Main and Highlands Libraries: $15,000 $15,000 Per the KCLS agreement,Facilities is responsible for major maintenance items exceeding$5,000. The Library over the Cedar River allocation has been eliminated as that building is under reconstruction. When completed,the building will be under warranty for a year and the City will not be responsbile for major or minor maintenance items. There will be costs associated with the Highlands Library if it is approved to be surplused after the completion of the new Highlands Library in 2015. Coulon Park: $27,000 $27,000 The structures at Coulon Park will require annual major maintenance of$27,000. In this park we have significant painting and power washing of structures. Exercise Equipment Replacement: $16,000 $16,000 The ongoing program to replace old exercise equipment,located throughout all public facilities,continues and will be$16,000.There are eight separate fitness room locations supported through this funding. Highland and N Highlands Community Centers $35,000 $35,000 Annual maintenance costs are high for the NHNC. It is very old,and the original construction was not industrial quality. Roof,siding,eave and gutter repairs are common for these buildings in addition to typical mechanical repairs and maintenance. Liberty Park Stadium: $5,000 $5,000 The stadium is old enough to need frequent concrete repairs and sealing. Replacement of the stadium with new public restrooms is part of the Tri-Park Master Plan. Total: $405,000 $343,000 AGENDA ITEM #2. e) ARTS&CULTURE MASTER PLAN Background: • In 2008, administration of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission (RMAC)was shifted from the Community Services Department to the Department of Community and Economic Development. • The Arts and Culture Master Plan which guides investments in public art for the City of Renton was adopted in 2010. • The Renton Municipal Arts Commission is comprised of 13 volunteer commissioners and has the responsibility of implementing the Arts and Culture Master Plan. • Funding: King County Lodging Tax funds, available through the grant-funding agency 4Culture, have been provided for this purpose.With the next grant fund cycle, however, it is anticipated that the amount received by Renton will be substantially reduced.4Culture art funding is dependent on matching funding from the City. Current and Future Work: • The RMAC has increased its efforts to implement the plan.They reviewed and refined the policies that would achieve the intended goals then identified near term priorities that could conceivably be accomplished within the next few years. The following are the policies and implementation strategies deemed to be the highest priorities by the RMAC: Vision: Renton aspires to be a center for arts and culture where traditional and contemporary arts thrive and creative industries are cultivated. Goal 1: Undertake activities to build awareness among all people about all aspects of the arts. PRIORITY ONE- Policy 1.1.2: Create a significant work of either temporary or permanent art. • Implementation strategy:Greatest interest and highest impact would be from a series of small works located throughout the Downtown, such as the recent "Art Garden,"located in an abandoned landscape area on Wells Ave S. t�iii s Wells Ave site before installation Wells Avenue Art Garden (solar lighting at night) PRIORITY TWO- Policy 1.3.4: Explore joint operating models with Carco Theatre and Renton Civic Theatre for cost effectiveness and impact. • Implementation strategy:RMAC Performing Arts Committee will initiate discussion and study other models in South King County cities. AGENDA ITEM #2. e) PRIORITY THREE—Policy 1.2.2: Make use of empty storefronts and buildings to enliven them with art. • Implementation strategy:RMAC to work with the City Center Community Plan Advisory Committee and the Economic Development Division of CED. PRIORITY FOUR—Policy 1.2.9: Support city policies that improve access to arts facilities. • Implementation strategy:Advocate for addition of art and culture venues to City of Renton facilities;investigate possible funding sources. PRIORITY FIVE— Policy 1.4.2: Foster the relationship between local filmmaking entities. • Implementation strategy:Continue to assist Renton's thriving filmmaking community to maintain and grow its status regionally. Support Renton SIFF and ReelRenton film events such as BestFest and FilmFrenzy. PRIORITY SIX—Policy 1.3.2: Develop a viable business model for the Renton IKEA Performing Arts Center (I PAC). • Implementation strategy:Initiate dialogue with the Renton School District. PRIORITY SEVEN—Policy 1.7.1: -Support live musical performance in the City. • Implementation strategy:Compile list of potential venues and connect sponsors with musicians. Initiate on-line community arts and culture events calendar. PRIORITY EIGHT—Policy 1.2.4: -Support development of parklets and streateries that incorporate art in Downtown Renton. • Implementation strategy: Work with the CED Economic Development Division Downtown Revitalization team and the City Center Community Plan Advisory Committee as parklets are developed. Use them as locations for the Galvanizing Art Projects. PRIORITY NINE—Policy 1.2.10: - Follow up with private citizens who have indicated an interest in partnering with the City on art exhibitions. • Implementation strategy: Work with Economic Development Division of CED to locate empty storefront in Downtown Renton for exhibition of art for exhibit. RMAC will organize event and ask for loan of artwork. PRIORITY TEN—Policy 1.2.6: Establish criteria and guidelines for the placement of public art in commercial and residential neighborhoods. • Implementation strategy:RMAC is working currently working on this document. Next Steps: • Develop work programs and identify revenue and grant resources to implement the RMAC priorities. AGENDA ITEM #2. ONE PERCENT FOR ART PROGRAM Background: • The City of Renton's One Percent for Art Program, initiated in 1975, was one of the first of its kind in the nation. It was originally intended to provide artwork in public facilities, to be paid for by one percent of the cost of design and construction of those facilities. • An early change to the program excluded water and sewer utility projects, due to inaccessibility. For this reason, these projects were, and still are, exempted from the program. • Later, it was determined that the art did not need to be located specifically in or at the capital improvement project. One percent of the cost of capital improvement projects would go into a fund for art to be located at appropriate locations throughout the City. • The Renton Municipal Arts Commission (RMAC) was charged with commissioning the fabrication or acquisition of public art,for a specific project, upon request by the Administration.The City Council was given the authority to approve or deny approval of art that is recommended by the RMAC.These steps have been formalized into Renton Municipal Code (RMC Title 2, Chapter 8). • For various reasons, the process outlined has not achieved its expectations. One of the most significant impacts of this is that,with the exception of transportation projects, one percent of the project cost is not budgeted and set aside at the beginning of the project.There are two problems with this. First, the art cannot be incorporated into the design of the project, and second, typically there are insufficient funds at the conclusion of the project to add art. Current Work: • The Finance Division of the Administrative Services Department has recently added a line to the Capital Improvements Plan worksheets to include 1% (estimated) amount for art to encourage project managers to budget for 1%. • All grant funding is currently excluded from the project costs, regardless of whether artwork is explicitly excluded by the grantor or not. Current work includes clarification of exclusions and verifying that state and federal funding guidelines for the arts being met. • RMC 2-8-3, states "The Commission shall be responsible for reviewing the design, execution and acceptance of works of art funded or otherwise acquired by the City. Procedures for these responsibilities shall be developed by the Commission in writing and a copy thereof shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City and furnished unto the office of the Mayor and City Council." It has been determined that no such procedures have been adopted.The RMAC is currently developing procedures to recommend for adoption. • The City Center Community Plan Advisory Board intends to recommend requirements that new private development projects in Downtown Renton include art in publically accessible locations on the project site. Next Steps: • Review general fund capital projects and determine whether they should contribute to the One Percent for Art Fund—Currently, of all capital projects, only transportation projects consistently contribute to the fund.Should all capital improvement projects be included in the Program? • Review general fund contribution to art and evaluate adequacy related to Arts Commission priorities. • Process following selection of artist—Currently, the artwork must be completely designed before the Council makes a decision on whether to fund it or not. How can the City Council become involved earlier in the process? • Maintenance of Public Art—Currently, there is no line item in the City's General Fund for maintenance of the public art collection. The One Percent for Art Program ordinance precludes the use of the Fund for maintenance. Several works in the collection, particularly outdoor sculpture are in need of repair. AGENDA ITEM #2. Renton Municipal Code Page 1/3 CHAPTER 8 MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION CHAPTER 8 MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION' SECTION: 2-8-1: Creation Of Municipal Arts Commission 2-8-2: Purpose 2-8-3: Function 2-8-4: Appointments 2-8-5: Members 2-8-6: Term 2-8-7: Works Of Art And Public Facilities 2-8-1 CREATION OF MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION: There is hereby created a Municipal Arts Commission.(Ord. 5155,9-26-05) 2-8-2 PURPOSE: The City of Renton recognizes and acknowledges the importance of and benefit to the public in providing visual art and performance in its public works and facilities,and encouraging and promoting such art and the work of artists.It shall therefore be the policy of the City,unless otherwise prohibited or limited by law,to direct and further the inclusion of art in its public works.The term"art"shall be liberally construed and includes the conscious production or arrangement of sounds,colors,forms,movements or other elements in a manner that affects the sense of beauty and is of aesthetic value. (Ord. 5155,9-26-05; Ord.5365,3-24-08) 2-8-3 FUNCTION: A. The Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor and City Council in connection with the artistic and cultural development of the City.The Commission shall also act as the conservator of the City's works of public art. B. The Commission shall be responsible for reviewing the design,execution and acceptance of works of art funded or otherwise acquired by the City.Procedures for these responsibilities shall be developed by the Commission in writing and a copy thereof shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City and furnished unto the office of the Mayor and City Council. Such procedures shall not be in full force and effect until approved by the City Council. C. The Commission shall develop,implement and update the Arts and Culture Master Plan,which shall include the City's vision and goals for future works of public art,and a strategic plan for implementing these goals. The Arts and Culture Master Plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Mayor and City Council on an annual basis.During the Commission's annual review of all capital improvement projects as set forth in subsection D of this Section,the Mayor shall propose,for Council review and approval,which Master Plan elements should receive funding based on the projected one percent(1%)for art funding guidelines as set forth in RMC 2-8-7 or as otherwise determined by the City Council. D. During the City's annual budget process,the Commission shall review with the Mayor,or his/her representative,all capital improvement projects anticipated within the following two(2)year period to determine which projects are appropriate for inclusion of works of art and to estimate the amount to be allocated for said purpose.The Mayor,with appropriate budgetary authorization from the City Council,may establish the amount to be provided for the project(s),as guided by RMC 2-8-7.If,however,the Mayor decides that there will be no funds expended for art on a municipal construction project,and upon concurrence from the City Council,then the funds allocated therefor shall be expended as set forth in RMC 2-8-7C or as otherwise determined by the City Council. Copies of any proposals prepared by the Commission shall likewise be furnished to the Department of Community and Economic Development of the City. 1. Definition of municipal construction project:Any public building,decorative or commemorative structure,park,street,sidewalk,parking facility,or any portion thereof,within the City limits,which will be The Renton Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 5783,passed February 1,2016. AGENDA ITEM #2. Renton Municipal Code Page 2/3 CHAPTER 8 MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION constructed,renovated or remodeled,and paid for wholly or in part by the City,and the total project cost of which exceeds ten thousand dollars($10,000.00)to construct,renovate or remodel. 2. "Municipal construction project"shall not be defined to include capital projects paid for wholly or in part by the City's water and sewer utility. E. Whenever a work of art is to be funded under this Chapter the Commission shall,under its guidelines,select the appropriate work(s)of art and recommend that work(s)of art to the City Council.The City Council shall consider the recommendation of the Commission and either approve or refuse to approve the recommended work(s) of art. Should the Council refuse to approve the work(s)of art,then the Commission shall consider and recommend another work(s)of art to the City Council. Should the City Council approve the work(s)of art,then the administration shall proceed to contract with the appropriate artist or artists to obtain the work(s)of art.The contract with the artist or artists will be administered by the City staff. F. Maintenance,inspection and rotation of works of art selected and installed under the advice and direction of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission shall be the responsibility of the administration of the City.The Commission may develop a conservation policy from which it may prepare specifications for a maintenance plan for the City's works of art.The artwork maintenance shall be performed by the City's Facilities Division.The Commission shall inspect such maintenance work and make recommendations for the guidance of the administration in so maintaining the works of art. G. The Commission shall seek,whenever appropriate,alternative sources of financing for the visual and/or performing arts. H. The Commission shall be responsible for disbursing money budgeted to it for support of cultural arts performances,arts-related activities and organizations,as resources allow. Such money shall be used to support specific performances such as choral concerts or play performances,performing arts events,or special projects of a performing arts group. Such funds may not be used for capital purchases,facility renovations,maintenance or other non-performance expenditures.Any such funded performance must be held in Renton and primarily benefit Renton residents. (Ord. 5155,9-26-05; Ord.5365,3-24-08; Ord.5684,3-25-13) 2-8-4 APPOINTMENTS: The Municipal Arts Commission shall consist of thirteen(13)members appointed by the Mayor and subject to confirmation by a majority of the members of the City Council. Of those thirteen(13)members,at least four(4) shall be residents of the City and one member shall be under the age of 21 years.All members of the Commission shall serve without compensation for such service. (Ord.5155,9-26-05;Ord. 5684,3-25-13) 2-8-5 MEMBERS: The membership on the Commission shall,whenever possible,include members from a variety of art fields and related professions.The Mayor and City Council may solicit suggested nominations for such appointments from architectural,art,musical,literary,educational and other cultural organizations. The Commission shall organize and elect a chair annually.The Commission may organize such subcommittees as it deems necessary.In order to implement such purposes,the Commission may call upon such City departments as will assist the Commission's function,and appointed City officials and members of the various City departments are encouraged to consult and advise with the Commission from time to time. (Ord. 5155,9-26-05; Ord. 5684,3-25-13) 2-8-6 TERM: All such appointments to the Commission shall be for three (3)year terms,with one-third(1/3)of the terms expiring each year.All appointments heretofore made by the Mayor and City Council to such Municipal Arts Commission are hereby confirmed.Members of the Municipal Arts Commission may be removed at any time by the appointing authority and vacancies for the remainder of unexpired terms shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (Ord. 5155,9-26-05) 2-8-7 WORKS OF ART AND PUBLIC FACILITIES: A. Subject to the consultation requirements of RMC 2-8-31),all authorizations and/or appropriations for municipal construction projects shall,concurrently,upon budgeting therefor by the City Council and authorization The Renton Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 5783,passed February 1,2016. AGENDA ITEM #2. Renton Municipal Code Page 3/3 CHAPTER 8 MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION by the Mayor,whenever legally permitted,include an amount equal to not less than one percent(1%)of the actual total project cost,to be used for the selection,acquisition and/or installation of works of art to be placed in,on,or about City public facilities,which are suitable and appropriate therefor.The amount that is transferred to the one percent(1%)for art fund,based on the project's budget cost that is used for planning purposes,shall be adjusted up or down from that amount,based on the actual total project cost after it has been completed.In the event any law, rule or regulation establishing a source of funds for a particular project,including but not limited to grants,loans,or assistance from Federal, State or other governmental units,prohibits,limits or excludes art and art works as a proper expenditure,then the amount of funds from such source shall be excluded in computing the one percent(1%) amount of the total project cost. B. All funds authorized and/or appropriated pursuant to this Section shall be maintained in the one percent(1%) for arts fund.The City Council,upon the recommendation and advice of the Commission,shall approve,from time to time,the amount to be allocated for the selection,acquisition and/or installation of individual works of art to be placed either as an integral part of the municipal construction project in connection with which the funds were appropriated or attached thereto,or detached within or outside such project,or to be placed in,on or about other public facilities.All of such expenditures for art shall be approved by the City Council and as otherwise provided by law. C. Funds authorized and/or appropriated pursuant to this Section for a municipal construction project but not expended on any such project shall be placed and retained in the one percent(I%)for arts reserve fund.If for any reason any transfer to such fund shall be contrary to law or prohibited by any rule or regulation governing such funds,then any such unspent or residual sum authorized and/or appropriated as a part of such construction project may be expended for any like or similar public purpose or purposes relating to the selection,acquisition and/or installation of works of art. (Ord.5155,9-26-05; Ord. 5365,3-24-08) 1 Prior legislation: Ords.2969, 10-6-75;3563,7-27-81;3678, 11-15-82;3749,9-26-83;4380, 12-7-92 and 4838, 5-8-2000. The Renton Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 5783,passed February 1,2016. AGENDA ITEM #3. a) SIDEWALKS Background: • Sidewalks and other infrastructure are typically located within the public right-of-way(ROW); a public ROWS is a type of easement granted mainly for public travel. • ROW infrastructure is typically installed by a developer in conjunction with development of the abutting private property; infrastructure is warrantied for two years. • Renton has over 440 miles of ROW with millions of dollars' worth of infrastructure; the cost of annual infrastructure maintenance/improvements generally exceeds the funds allocated by the City Budget/Transportation Improvement Plan. • Because ROWS are technically easements granted by abutting property owners, those owners are usually responsible for the maintenance of the ROW between their property line and the road in order to offset the cost to the governing jurisdiction. • Most urban cities within Washington obligate the property owner to be responsible for the abutting sidewalk. However, some cities do accept the responsibility of maintenance/repairs either in whole or in part(see Attachment A). Current Work: • City staff propose to relieve residential property owners (those properties within the RC thru R- 14 zoning districts) of sidewalk maintenance, repairs, and new construction, either in part or entirely. • City code requires property owners to be responsible for all maintenance and/or repairs of that portion of sidewalk abutting their property. However, in practice the City has made repairs to existing sidewalk and constructed new sidewalk abutting residential properties because the cost of repairs/construction is too onerous for individual property owners or where the benefit to the public outweighs the reduction of available funds. While continuing to require property owners to be responsible, staff propose to continue the current practice of repairing sidewalks in residential neighborhoods with the following guidelines: • Abutting property owner responsible for removal of obstructing trees/vegetation. • Less than 50% block length damaged: Panel repair/replacement with color tinting. • Greater than 50% block length damaged: Entire replacement using Complete Street standards. • Funding for sidewalk repair/construction is currently derived from the general fund, fee in-lieu of program, and Safe Routes to School Grants. Next Steps: • Staff is preparing a variety of options for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider. • Staff will propose a priority matrix based on the proximity to specified features or land uses, coupled with a rating scale of sidewalk conditions (see Attachment B). • Because new construction and repairs will be relegated by the annual City budget, the expense to the City would be unchanged. • Develop a SEPA based non-motorized transportation mitigation program which can be used to augment funding for sidewalk repairs. AGENDA ITEM #3, a) Attachment A:Washington Cities Sidewalk Policy Survey C"tty. Re poi sibility: Funs ding/Program: Anacortes abutting property owner Owner pays for materials,City pays for labor Auburn abutting property owner Abutting property shall not be charged with any costs of construction or reconstruction in excess of 50%of the valuation of such abutting property,exclusive of improvements. Bothell abutting property owner Lengths of sidewalk construction exceeding one block may be funded partially or in whole by the City. Covington abutting property owner Abutting property owner shall not be charged with any costs of repair in excess of 25 percent of the valuation of the abutting exclusive of improvements. Federal Way abutting property owner Issaquah abutting property owner Kent abutting property owner Original construction:Developer/City Maintenance/Repair:Abutting property Kirkland abutting property owner Mt.Vernon abutting property owners Owner pays for materials,and City pays for labor. Newcastle abutting property owner Olympia abutting property owner Puyallup abutting property owner Seatac abutting property owner Original Construction: Developer/City Repairs:Abutting property shall not be charged with any costs of construction or reconstruction in excess of 25%of the valuation of such abutting property,exclusive of improvements. Seattle abutting property owners, However,if the sidewalk damage is being caused by City infrastructure such as a City- owned tree or sewer line,the City will take the responsibility for making the repairs. Shoreline abutting property owner Tacoma abutting property owner Owner bears all expenses, unless an LID is established. Vancouver abutting property owner Woodinville abutting property owner Bellevue City Bellingham City Burlington City Redmond City $250,000/year from "Pedestrian Program" Sammamish City AGENDA ITEM #J. B� c y ± » u » ® \ ) k c 2 u I » y > e / § � k > ® % c 2 iE o 0 Ln � 0 § 4� 2 f � j � E » < ƒ - ? L 41 % \ k < § 2 o / / 0 2 y \ \ / u ƒ m 2 / / < a y g I E a a § $ / / } 0 E > e u ° = \ % ƒ o 7 0 0 1E E E 0 e � I > > � g g 2 ro ro c -0 2 4 2 2 ° I x 0 � I I / \ ® u _2 k � — ¥ ( R \ § G G § 2 « 2 # e e R � - a w � m m a 7 ) R > R R • R ƒ \ \ ƒ ƒ / \ \ \ � E \ 7 Ei J \ § \ 7 > R > 4 2 7 I a) 7 % \ $ E 0% QJ Ln > Ln 9 Ln Fj \ / E / > 7 7 u 2 > i n 2 2 2 = Ln (A 2 u0�� pu0) �emams \ k k k z 2 2 G .,x...., r t / l / %/� /��'/'��//" / �9g�✓�,,n i , �fi oil �� �i' �I „��i /�j T.� �1%! �, k� 0 %Oi, / �"w" ' i �� � ��� ��r/, �,�w.. /� �,,.� � y ii�� n�i� A � .�o�` ➢° � �i �, � ..w'm iw^ Y � � �� �,�; �i � d i � � �� �,,; ti z j� � f t . ,, ,: a� � �,.. �e„ 'r ,. ,. ;i I �. x, i r Ifl,�rt< ,,r„, r: rnd � r I 1,�' �I l� f �i 'p 1 Y I II I I I I,i I�I I'I I�Ip rH ��° � � � i� � 11 � �i r � I� i 1' �i �� � � , .�,,,�u., ,,,,,� �`` ��� ,���.�„ �� �;,,. � � � 'n� � , �+ I: Y p ��� �,r�, �� r ��,, ``w �' �� � ��� � ��t ,i i "",'���r o,. � �,'�° a ,� � � � AGENDA ITEM #4. a) V �0 _ � a� _ a) M Q O Ln I ._ LU •� .� ate-+ m L aA > j Yff PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT E M 0 R A N D U DATE: January 25,2016 TO: Doug Jacobson, Deputy Public Works Administrator—Transportation FROM: Chris M. Barnes, Sr.,Transportation Operations Manager SUBJECT: Applicability of Bluetooth Technology Issue: Should the city of Renton use Bluetooth technology for traffic counts, performing vehicle speeds surveys, collecting corridor travel time data, performing origin-destination studies and collecting turning movement counts? Background: Accurate and reliable traffic data information is very important for the efficient management of our roadway network, reducing congestion and reducing corridor travel time.The information can also be useful for measuring performance related to traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, and performing origin-destination studies. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows personal computers, lap tops, cell phones and other electronic devices to communicate with each other to transfer information/files from one device to another. It uses radio waves and is designed to be a secure and inexpensive way of connecting and exchanging information between wireless devices'. Bluetooth technology obtains data from Bluetooth devices (cell phones, GPS navigation devices etc) using Media Access Control (MAC) address matching. This method records the MAC address of a device passing one location and then notes the time difference when that same MAC address passing a different location.The device has to be in "discoverable" mode to be able to detect the information.Wi-Fi uses the same basic approach and by using Wi-Fi you can typically capture a larger sample size since most of the cellphones have Wi-Fi signals that users leave activated. Bluetooth technology typically has a match rate of 5%of vehicles in a corridor,while the match rate of data for Wi-Fi technology is 35%-45%. A wide range of travel time data collection technologies including Bluetooth and Wi-Fi technologies have been introduced over the last decade. Table 1 shows a comparison of some of the travel time data collection technologies that are used by other agencies in our region. Wi- Fi and/or Bluetooth technologies have the capability of collecting data that can be used to calculate corridor travel times and origin-destination of vehicles. Using Bluetooth or Wi-Fi technologies for turning movement counts and two way traffic counts are not as accurate as the current methods. C:\users\gzimmerman\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\o4hbpb34\bluetooth-w`rfi technology memo 0125 16.doc � �� �� . ���~x�u�x� xx �~xnw n��'. o�� Pag��o�7 �� Table 1Comparison ofTravel Time Iu0mromu1iom U Ln Q) Bluetooth only Bluetooth only Mounted within Pole Pole Mounted Pole Mounted Pole Mounted Cabinet(Antenna Mounted on Top) 4� Cellular C3 QJ 4� 3G Modem 3G Modem 3G Modem Ethernet C) modem Battery/ Battery/ Solar/ Solar/ Wired Wired Wired Wired Wired Travel Time Comparison: The city recently installed a demonstration version of Bluetooth and VVi-pi system from 4cydicawas ^: installed Stcorridor from HoquiamntoUnion Streets. We also performed a travel time study in in the AM peak time period using the floating car method.We then compared the travel times using the floating car methodology vs the data collected using the Acydicahardware and software. The floating car method using avehide that travels inthe platoon ofmoving vehicles atthe average speed ofthe platoon. Genera|ky, the test vehicle will pass avehicle for every vehicle that passes it. The test vehicle driver will attempt tovary the time ofday atwhich the vehicle enters the traffic stream atthe beginning of a segment so as not tofollow a platoon that is progressing well or one having to stop at most red signals. The floating car data collection was done for only one day whereas the Acyclica data were taken for five days.The Acydicadata should be abetter representation ofwhat ishappening inthe corridor than the manual data. We used the travel time from Hoquiam Ave to Union Ave (WB) onNE��m Stfor the comparison with the results shown inTable 2. Table 2 Travel Time Comp rimmn I Floating Car Method Acyclica Product Eft:q:u:ia�mto U�nion Ave � 177 sec 103 sec Table 3 shows acost comparison between different systems and our in-house floating car travel time method.We have compared the cost for yearly and quarterly data collection.The cost of using the floating car method and Acydica systems are very comparable if you are performing the study in one corridor once a year. But ifv*ecollected travel time data onaquarterly basis or if we increased the number of corridors we evaluated the Acyclica costs less than the floating car method. [)wse,s\gzimme,man\appdata\|oca|\micmsoft\windmws\t mpumryintemet M|es\comentout|ooWw4hbpb34\Nuotooth wiMtechnology memo Dz2sz6.doc Page 3 of 7 AGENDA ITEM #4. b) There are two things that we need to consider. First, do we need to do quarterly travel times? Secondly, do we have the necessary resources to use the data if we collected it? Ideally we only need to do the travel time data collection once per year in a corridor. The data would then be used to update the City Synchro traffic level-of-service model and modify the signal timing based on the data gathered. Since 2014, we have been able to complete only one corridor travel time analysis. Table 3 Cost Compa is for Travel Time t i ors Study Methods Details for Study Setups Cost Cost Cost if Done (one/Year) Quarterly Data Collection : 3 hours for 2 persons per corridor to drive and $5,400 Floating Car manually collect data $8,280 $3320 method ,1 Data ProceLs�&Analyze: 4 hours to process data and analysis per $2,880 corridor(one person) Hardware and Software lease/year $5,000 Using Acyclica Signal Technician Cost for Hardware & Installation & Removal of equipment $8,600 $19,400 Software from Signal Cabinet or Pole. $3,600 Analysis is performed by the Acyclica software Product purchase Cost/year $14,325 Blip System Signal Technician Cost for $17,925 $28,725 (Hardwired) Installation & Removal from Signal $3,600 Cabinet or Pole with Analysis Done by Program Product purchase Cost/year $4,655.0 Blip System (Solar Signal Technician Cost for $26,875 $37,675 powered System) Installation & Removal from Signal $3,600 Cabinet or Pole with Analysis Done by Program Table 4 shows the cost associated to do an origin-destination study. If Acyclica or Blip Systems are used,the only additional cost would be the signal technician time since we will already have the units available. C:\users\gzimmerman\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\o4hbpb34\bluetooth-wifi technology memo 0125 16.doc AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Page 4 of 7 Table 4 Cosarison for_.0rigin-Destination Study #of units Cost for Origin Study Methods Details for Unit Cost need to #of -Destination Study Setups place for Hours Study one O-D Origin - Destination Consultant 800 5 NA $4,000 Study From Consultant Signal Acyclica/Blip Technician Assuming System Origin- Cost for $60/hr.for 1 Destination installation & Signal 5 10 $600* Study Removal from Technician Signal Cabinet or Pole This cost is additional to the cost of Products Table 5 shows a comparison of doing a combination of a travel time study and origin-destination study once a year. The total cost for Acyclica is less per year if we combine travel time and origin-destination study. Table 5 Cost Comparison for Travel Time and Ori in-Destination Stud ce a Year Study Methods Total Cost per Year Travel Time Study (in-house) & $12,280 O-D Study (Contractor) Using Acyclica $9,200 (Travel Time& Origin- Destination Study) Using Blip System (Hardwired) $18,525 (Travel Time&Origin- Destination Study) Using Blip System (Solar) $27,475 (Travel Time &Origin- Destination Study) Advantages& Disadvantages: The following advantages and disadvantages of using the Acyclica system Travel Times and Origin-Destination Studies: Disadvantage: • Installation of the units will take additional signal technician's time. • Requires nearby power source and needs to be at or near the intersection. • Devices will need to be pole mounted or installed in a signal cabinet. Advantages: 0 Equipment and software can be used for both travel time and origin-destination studies. C:\users\gzimmerman\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\o4hbpb34\bluetooth-wifi technology memo 0125 16.doc AGENDA ITEM #4. b) Page 5 of 7 • Provides better average results than the manual methods because data can be collected over a longer period of time at no additional cost. • Data collection will allow traffic signal timing of major corridors throughout the city to be updated on a regular basis. • Costs less than the combined data collection for travel time and origin-destination studies using the manual method. • Does not require engineering staff time to collect and analyze the data. Recommendation: We recommend purchasing or leasing a Bluetooth and Wi-Fi technology to collect the travel time and origin-destination data.Transportation Operations will then be able to use the best data to update City's arterial SYNCHRO traffic signal timing analysis program to retime corridor signals once per year.Transportation Operations does not have sufficient staffing levels to update the Synchro model or retime the arterial corridor signals more frequently than once a year. The City should continue doing turning movement counts, 24-hour traffic volume counts and speed studies with a contractor or city staff using more traditional equipment. C:\users\gzirnrnerrnan\appdata\local\rnicrosoft\windows\temporary internet files\content,outlook\o4hbpb34\bluetooth-wifi technology memo 0125 16.doc G ATTEM #4. b) Ln Ln 0 r44 r44 0 rt It 4 m Ch co +1 > m o In Arj- in u cr ----------- 41 Ln Ln 0 > r1t u co 00 m 4, as 0 E 0 Ln Ln co CIA 0 oc� C� LR n IR 0 D Ln Ln rn I;T rn rn m rI4 u Ln 0 0 0 tD E cu 'SU3/'IH/ISO:) 0 6 Poped lead JO# (U Al!:) aqj Ul AOP!Jjo:)Jorevq 10 4 0 0 2 sjnOH 10# C) w rn M m si!un jouOsI,3d 10 (A 1 0 tw tioto C: t10 C: M y4.1 c tio C: c C: M a Ln — on tio tw CL 0 E 0 E .C,- 11 .u C: CL E uj 0 E E u a Ln E a Ln :3 �.D = J= Ln W) 0 Ln FW LA " 00 0 U LA 0 'E Lni 4 0 8 u u u < Ln o w 0 a) < 0 qA- D 4- LLJ < 4- 4, - 2v 42 E E E E 0 0 0 Ln Ln CL 41 4 M 0 0 > m > > 0 > 0 0 m 4 0 0 0 0 4� 0 M o 4 4 0 C: Ln u E u E CL 0 < 0 L- 0 a a) 0 E u ai u 0 u m 0 u 0 cz CL 0 " a) 41 CZ 41 Y 41 m U a) 4� 0 LA CL m S a — u a) 0 a) 0 0 u 0 .0 u 0 -0 u 0 0 0 0) LA 0 LA U 41 W P: 4 :3 75 M _0 -75 m 4 41 w 0 0 CL w Ln Ln .® Lw qn tw C-4 L a U-)Ln (A Ln u Qj 0 cz cz iz 0 C, u a 0 W m rA E 4 o 4 0 m E .2 Z,- 41 E E E u U E tA 0 0 u >- 0 o E 4� L- 4� CL L Ln 4Ln cU 4 C: 0 aj 4, 41 CL 4 o Ln u 3: Ln LL 4- co co CO co Ln I u AGENDA ITEM #4. b) References ' hftp://www.eitis.orci/sites/eitis/files/case-studies/documents/bliptrack wife tech factsheet.pdf C:\users\gzimmerman\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\o4hbpb34\bluetooth-wifi technology memo 0125 16.doc AGENDA ITEM #5. a) BENSON HILL COMMUNITY PLAN Background: • In October 2013, City Council adopted the Benson Hill Community Plan (see attached Executive Summary). • Implementation of the Plan was postponed in order to allocate sufficient resources to the development of the City's Comprehensive Plan,which was adopted in June 2015. • Staff began advertising Advisory Board positions in April 2015; the Board will help guide implementation of the Benson Hill Community Plan. To be eligible for appointment to a Community Planning Advisory Board, prospective members must live, own property, or represent a business or non-profit organization within the planning area. Additionally,the Board will be supplemented by one member of the Parks Commission, and one member of the Planning Commission who will serve as Chair of the Board. • To date, five applications have been received. Staff is attempting to confirm the continued eligibility and commitment of the applicants. Current Work: • Confirm eligibility and commitment of current applicants. • Seek opportunities to acquire land that can be used for recreational opportunities, specifically a community center, and possibly facilitate some commercial uses. • Begin improvements to 116th Avenue SE, totaling over$10M, which will be completed by 2021; these improvements include road widening to 3-lanes, creating bike lanes, installing curb/gutter/sidewalk, street lights and signals, landscaping, and storm drainage facilities throughout the 2.5 mile stretch of road that bisects the Benson Hill Community Planning Area. Next Steps: • Once five applicants have been confirmed, make a recommendation to the Mayor for appointment. r � 1 , N" li m• mllll X11 � a 2 �' 0n �f r ppm t 14J III k f,a��t�U1ll� ((.! Il %/%�.I�i oom ymit 1 Q C7,� a mm T N • e lllf. ea � i. n. • . s s s�etr:v17 �1%` __ t �,,,, �J III III all a � II 1111 o'II ?Y A F w h r i P > N 4 6 �� � 1 d u IIS >mlll nil" uol I° I Iia r4 . r °I ' � an °I � I. ,✓ a I� r m ul IIS rP � ° IIS I i mlu 071 •�. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) ANNEXATION POLICY Background: • Since 1990, the City has completed 63 annexations;these annexations have significantly changed the size and character of Renton. (see map attached) • Also during that same period of time,the population of the City has grown from 41,688 to 98,470. • The City has 3 large Potential Annexation Areas (PAA's)that are in the City Comprehensive Plan and King County Countywide Planning Policies.The PAA's are divided between 3 large geographical areas: East Renton, West Hill, and Fairwood. (see map attached) • Since 2003, the City has had a policy requiring a minimum size of at least 10 acres for annexations. (Exceptions have been made for circumstances such as: schools, non-profits, etc.) • From 2006—2009, the City charged $2,500 fee for annexations. While the fees were waived several times, the average size of annexations was more than 100 acres, more than three times the size of annexations processed when no fee was charged. • When properties annex,the City benefits from ensuring new development occurs with Renton development regulations. If properties don't annex, new development will still occur, but using King County development regulations. In East Plateau, where the City is the sewer provider, new development is limited by requirements for septic systems. • Until January 1, 2015, state law supported annexations of populations over 10,000 by offering a "credit" against the state portion of the sales tax to offset transition costs and some of the deficits to serve the areas over 10 years.This funding helped cities close some of the gap between service costs and revenues. o Without this supportive funding from the state, unless the city is willing to accept the financial challenges of annexing the PAA's, large annexations are unlikely. Average Annexation Size (in acres) 120 ................................................................................................................................................................118.6..................................................................................................................................................................................... 100 80 ............................................................................................................................................. 60 40 31.6.... 15.5 20 8 .3 4.4 2000-2003 2003 2006 2009 Current (Set 10 acres (Adopt (Reduce min. size) $2,500 fee) fee to $0) Current Work: • Staff resources used to process an annexation include: writing a legal description; creation of numerous maps; estimates of fiscal analysis and growth projections; review by Transportation, Wastewater, Water, Street Maintenance, Planning, Parks, Fire, and Police; at least 2 meetings before Council; preparation of information for Boundary Review Board; preparation of ordinances; and execution of special census. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) • Regardless of the size, annexations essentially take the same amount of staff work to process. o Given that, it is in the City's interest to incentivize larger annexations. • Since 2011, 3 of the 6 annexations completed have been less than 5 acres in size. • A review of 18 jurisdictions in Western Washington found that 8 charge a fee for annexations. Issaquah, Lynnwood, and Woodinville charge the actual costs of processing the annexation (publications, mailings, staff time, etc.); Woodinville requires a $6,500 deposit towards the anticipated charges.The lowest fee is$709 in Bellingham,the highest is$13,603 plus$82 per acre in Covington, and the approximate average is$4,639. (see chart attached) Next Steps: • Consider adopting a fee again.To incentivize larger annexations the fee should be scaled: $5,000 for annexations smaller than 10 acres and $2,500 for annexations larger than 10 acres. ............... N ;W E S S IIN IDdN LAKE BOREN Miles 0 0.5 1 ��z W C,A S 1 in=1 miles nr LAKE WASHINGTON J mf 41 Y MERRITT E R I ....... --- V 1.E 4ini (D HOQUIAM t111 INVESTMENT FORBAY 0 Lu Lu V4 EL Lu < AllI�N Lu Ir,U K W A 4`1 1 EI `q LAKE DE FALK, Community&Economic Development C E.'Chip-vi-t A d,1..Ab--kh Adm nrstrator' GIS Anal Lt t LAKE 1,City of Renton 2014 Boundary 11111111111111111111111114684,11/5/1997,Hoffman III111111111111111111115092,9/22/2004,Tydico 15243,1/14/2007,Maplewood Addition I-----15488,10/30/2009,Duvall South T I- PAA Boundary 4760,4/21/1998,East Renton Plateau NON 5096,11/2/2004,Johnson 11111111111111111111111115261,3/15/2007,Perkins 5543,8/1/2010,Sierra Heights Elementary Annexations since GMA 4780,5/19/1999,Davis 5138,6/1/2005,Honey Creek 1 5283,6/11/2007,Leitch IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5545,8/1/2010,Maplewood Heights Elementary OrdNo,Effective,Annexation 14819,12/15/1999,Smith ] 5140,6/1/2005,Maplewood East 5293,7/30/2007,Aster Park 5552,11/7/2010,Kendall 1 611 1 13163,10/24/1997,J&F Investment 4829,2/16/2000,Morrison 5142,6/1/2005,Merritt I -----15301,10/22/2007,Anthone' 5631,11/13/2011,Tess jr/F/////l 4275,7/29/1990,Duncan 4876,12/13/2000,Knight 10/fflMl 5147,7/4/2005,Wedgewood Lane 177]5315,12/24/2007,Marshall 5632,11/20/2011,Gaile 1 14318,7/21/1991,Shurgard 4891,2/21/2001,Morlino Empire Estates 5161,11/27/2005,Park Terrace 15318,4/16/2008,Merrit 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5655,4/1/2012,Fairlane Woods 14337,1/25/1992,Honey Creek Ridge IIM 4918,10/24/2001,Lee 5171,1/8/2006,Mosier 11 5327,3/1/2008,Benson Hill 5665,7/4/2012,Windstone V 4383,12/16/1992,Senescu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4924,12/5/2001,Piele INN 5175,12/21/2005,Lindberg IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5373,6/9/2008,AQUA BARN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5713,4/30/2014,Maertins ----14476,10/26/1994,Winsper 100101115012,6/18/2003,Vuong -----15203,5/3/2006,Hoquiam 5398,8/11/2008,Liberty 5719,8/17/2014,Alpine Nursery I I I-----14510,5/3/1995,Stonegate 5041,12/10/2003,Falk 1 5205,5/3/2006,Falk 11 5447,4/10/2009,Springbrook Terrace ICE 5722,9/24/2014,Trace Matthew 100014564,12/11/1995,Holman 5064,3/24/2004,Bales 5208,6/18/2006,Akers Farms 5456,5/31/2009,MacKay 1 City Limits Before GMA 4579,2/14/1996,Ammarco 5068,4/28/2004,Stoneridge 5223,11/19/2006,Querin 11 5459,7/5/2009,Shamrock 4642,11/27/1996,Hughes 5074,5/26/2004,Carlo 5236,5/24/2007,Hudson IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5484,10/14/2009,Earlington Last(.Ipclate 2.11012.716 j iiJ ' AGENDA ITEM #6. a) F / Renton Potential „mo' sc� � Annexation Areas ............/ ,i Lake`8exren ; City Limits SEAT.. PAA Boundary `fry f l 8M West Hill ll, Ce% �. otaai/viii%////%%�/1,' Rk„,,/,..,,„ East L Plateau IN , e 11 I �� \ '_Zr1iL ug•,;1�r% LJ K W I.._ f v Q eil — �--- ' Fairwood r-- 5 5 ) ro Lake) sire 'oo I Shadyllrake 1 Panther Lake j Community and Ec comic Development yl;' aabramovich@rentonwa.gov ---.-. Printed on:2/15/2016 'CIVY Urention 0 ' �` AGENDA ITEM #6. a) Annexation Fees Charged City Fee Auburn No charge Bellevue No charge Bellingham $709 Bothell No charge Covington $13,603 Plus$82/acre Everett No charge Federal Way No charge Issaquah Actual cost $100/staff hour Kent No charge Kirkland No charge Lakewood $2,820 Lynnwood Actual cost Deposit/per staff hour cost not listed Monroe $1,200 Less than 10 acres (plus, actual cost of mailings) $1,475 More than 10 acres (plus, actual cost of mailings) Redmond $3,179 Single family/non-corporate (for SEPA) $3,830 All others (for SEPA) Sammamish No charge Seattle No charge Woodinville Actual cost With $6,500 deposit AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITYWIDE CODE COMPLIANCE Background: • In 2015, a total of 757 code compliance cases were opened, and of those 601 were closed as a result of satisfactory compliance (remaining cases are being pursued). • The ten most common violations are: 1. Various Violations (property maintenance 5. Sidewalk Obstruction violations—broken windows, gutters, 6. Garbage Storage etc.) 7. Outdoor Storage (limited to 200 sq. ft.) 2. Overgrown Grass &Vegetation 8. Bulk Waste Storage 3. Operating without Business License 9. Non-permitted Temporary Signs 4. Junk Vehicle Storage 10. Work without a Building Permit • For comparison,the top ten misconceptions of violations (that cannot be addressed by the Code Compliance Division) are: 1. Parking on Grass (residential lots) 7. Commercial Vehicles on Residentially-Zoned 2. Landlord/tenant disputes Property(requesting new ordinance) 3. Vehicles in the Right of Way(Police 8. Property Line Disputes (between private handle these complaints) property owners over vegetation, parking, 4. Septic Problems (King County Health property access, etc.) Department) 9. Garage Rentals (renting garage space to non- 5. Bad Smells occupants) 6. Wild Animal Feeding 10. Flooding Caused by Adjacent Property • In 2015,466 Business Licenses were reviewed by Code Compliance. • An additional Code Compliance Officer was added in 2015. • The 23.61 square miles of City limits is divided among three districts allowing each officer to be responsible for a distinct area (see attached Code Enforcement Districts map). • The protocol of opening a case, documenting the violation(s), providing requisite warnings, issuing fines, and possibly prosecuting non-compliant property owners is a time consumptive process. • Officers spend significant time traveling throughout the 440 miles of City roads to respond to potential violations. • When Building Inspectors have available time,they assist with code compliance. However, in recent years the rate of development has consumed their availability. Officers are also aided by citizens via programs like the "Wipe Out Graffiti" initiative (see attached flyer). Current Work: • The Division commenced a concentrated effort to enforce the International Property Maintenance Code and Zoning Code and currently has one designated Officer in the downtown. • Significant outreach to property owners was provided. Of the 52 properties given an abatement notice, 25 have attained compliance and 22 are progressing towards compliance.The remaining five have been referred to the City Attorney's Office for possible legal action. • Drafting revised Shopping Cart Regulations. Next Steps: • Consider directing staff to prepare an Adopt-a-Street Program modeled after Seattle's,which was established in the late 1980s and has gained recognition as one of the most effective and efficient grassroots litter-removal initiatives. • Consider creating an Abatement Fund that would allocate resources for abatement when property owners fail to comply; liens would encumber affected properties and replenish funds thereby creating a self-sustaining fund. (See the example of a City-abated nuisance on the next page.) • Commence outreach to the business community regarding new Shopping Cart Regulations. AGENDA ITEM #7. b) NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM EXAMPLE: 220 PARK AVENUE N BEFORE After several years of ongoing complaints of drug activity, trespassing, and dumping of garbage, the City posted the bank-owned property as a public health concern, and utilized progressive code enforcement to issue a lien upon the property for the cost of cleanup and repair. All of the garbage, including hypodermic needles, was removed and access to both the house and garage boarded-up. Subsequently, necessary repairs, general maintenance, and some aesthetic improvements were made. The lien has been repaid and the property is now for sale. AFTER � r ✓F'°J ri`�f y�✓,�dl� Id ii �IY�NIVP i P r ./ �/ u i r Code Enforcement DistrictsVFW. „ „�„� �„�_„ Enforcement Districts ” Code En Y DONNA u ROB R �" r '.wit ........... i [21 b � TIM " Lake .<,. . ...... kk n KI 11 M, � p�Ia „'II \ t k p4 \� Q_5 $r N � ,i ! ..... a I Mrle ��I�irnyk � � " a % — — 1 u. , I I Reference Scale.1:50,000 � v ♦W r V W \ J r~ w r �II. " u'r3 j 'gyp 'nrJ74 Y 1 rr Ntr �tll i . U� %. .. ."h ..... v , A % F u a soo w, r �� �il`ori .... "".. to . ✓' lw.,� � . d ...% .,,, „�..... I �.":� r i� r l�....:: �,�.��"� �✓*' 'k rr� �� �,, � �% der � ~mom.....,. OIC ; w � NI'I: f Y I m V�L ;.t . .:....� ....., 9i i.....� ... �" w �f1r� .. r R 9� h ..., u°° �r�� V IT � >r" .� � � re ���� rr�� � wvt" �� 7.;1' � �n �l'N."r•` �., . 4/1 rf;=,, ,� .� ... n � s tFr h�°P ! � 769 J' ....% ll L.,. •✓ �^"^ � y,. ; rw R, � V� a t` ,;, "^ „�a,' A Ul"1f'7'• f"N:dld'y� dv�t d n A � r " �. LA ,ht"off" .. 541 ........ / is r�wy5b1fii// �1 9.�. �' ���'"� (�'l.. N t tr"w" �t �''t"` p"v✓ � � y �'+-0 �i iiwr i 4 � lkh � ✓oi � � � � t �� 4�✓� � � � �;. 41 s., H�'� � �1.. r'� �.•� M .,,_1F1 i,� 1p�ry� „s�4 J' i °`l g (�_'.a t`' %��� � � �a�� � � IILA% 1 � _. w s li .. m .-A.�,-: + ,l � Iu ta 1 ��._,_ r I��/ / - � ;w"' , 7Zdu �� x w W,I,,", ::: MOffi S1 66� ppp �� .,.... : ld dFl t � 7 'rrrdtrrrrrrr ��,.�✓� `"" � � %�� � ��y ll r �� qq , i cv 6.E."Chip"Vincent Adriana Abramovich 4 �....0 µ� ,`� v, I;(7(7 4�`1ry�I1,�,,,,,,,, ,; Lake Administrator GIS Ano�lYs[ r. .�:,,�M....,,N'.. t �� a ..y�CPyaRAlFder Lae..,...,.....--...x w "" "� V.� Youngs „w cv .. _, in v»u. �p nt6 IIrt ti / ..... Gommumty&E,conomic Det-elopment -.. �,.....-R, ...,rr rrrrrrrrrrrrttttrrrrrrrrr"rr� ;ilrrrrrrrrrr�rr rrrrrr�rr rrrrrn �� �� � �„ ��T "��,� d dD" rm� vu , � � r / V I r I i- W r r��j %` Available � anyone Providing the� City of Renton with information leading to identification and appprelhens,ion of any. Person who commits gr � � �tlimits�I IIII -2 -2 fj AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Graffiti Abatement in Renton Highlights of Renton's Graffiti Abatement Ordinance - • It is illegal to possess graffiti paraphernalia with the intention of using it to deface public, or private property within the City limits • Allows the Court to order those convicted of graffiti vandalism to pay damages to the victim, including the City of Renton • Allows the City to assign up to a $5,000 liability to the parent of a minor caught committing graffiti vandalism • Authorizes the City to offer a $300 reward for information leading to the identification and apprehension of any person who commits graffiti vandalism If you see "tagging" in progress, immediately call 9-1-1. To report existing graffiti, call the City's graffiti hotline at (425) 430-7373. When graffiti is found on private property, it is the property owner's responsibility to remove it within 48 hours. The City does have "graffiti removal kits" available for free to anyone who cannot afford to remove graffiti from their property. The kits are available at City Hall, the Renton Fire Stations, the City's libraries, and all of the community centers in Renton. Anyone interested in volunteering to join the City's efforts to clean-up graffiti, is encouraged to call the graffiti hotline, and someone will get back with them about the volunteer program. 1 i �. � i.�w i� Ip��i RY" I ,, �;; I�u i �"6'� i p i. ��� 'd�1., �. ,e 1 4' � ' �. ti� i. a i � vnw 1 � �� � i �Y � �. i �� ii, r „ � �o� � ' E:. � _. �a ��� � .�. ii� ������ � 'a a. e l� ., -a., ,, .., �� ,.���� rn, i �,. 7 �^� m. 1 � � � � � � � � r� � �� � � I rJ �; � ui � ��/ ��� iia l c%, %; � h �� AGENDA ITEM #7. Graffiti Abatement in Renton Highlights of Renton's Graffiti Abatement Ordinance - • It is illegal to possess graffiti paraphernalia with the intention of using it to deface public, or private property within the City limits • Allows the Court to order those convicted of graffiti vandalism to pay damages to the victim, including the City of Renton • Allows the City to assign up to a $5,000 liability to the parent of a minor caught committing graffiti vandalism • Authorizes the City to offer a $300 reward for information leading to the identification and apprehension of any person who commits graffiti vandalism If you see 'tagging" in progress, immediately call 9-1-1. To report existing graffiti, call the City's graffiti hotline at (425) 430-7373. When graffiti is found on private property, it is the property owner's responsibility to remove it within 48 hours. The City does have "graffiti removal kits" available for free to anyone who cannot afford to remove graffiti from their property. The kits are available at City Hall, the Renton Fire Stations, the City's libraries, and all Of the community centers in Renton. Anyone interested in volunteering to join the City's efforts to clean-up graffiti, is encouraged to call the graffiti hotline, and someone will get back with them about the volunteer program. IIIIII�UU '�� « « • « « • • Y • • « « • • • • • f • 1 I I 2016-2021 GOALS o Provide a safe, Promote economic Support planned Building an inclusive Deet service demands healthy,vi)))brant vntalliity and strategically giro th and in-fluence in-formed city with and provide high community position Renton-for decisions that impact opportunities-for 4111111 quality customer IIIIIIIIIIIII Promote safety,health, the-future the city IIIIIIIIIIIII Improve access to city service and security through 1111111111111 Promote Renton as the 1111111111111 Foster development services and programs iiiiiiiiiiiiii Plan,develop,and effective communication progressive,opportunity- of vibrant,sustainable, and make residents maintain quality services, and service delivery rich city in the Puget attractive,mixed-use and businesses aware infrastructure,and IIIIIIIIIIII Facilitate successful Sound region neighborhoods in urban of opportunities to amenities neighborhoods through IIIIIIIIIIIII Capitalize on centers be involved with their IIIIIIIIIIIIII Prioritize services community involvement opportunities through IIIIIIIIIIIII Uphold a high standard community at levels that can be IIIIIIIIIIII Encourage and partner bold and creative of design and property 1111111111111 Build connections with sustained by revenue in the development of economic development maintenance ALL communities that IIIIIIIIIIIII Retain a skilled quality housing choices strategies reflect the breadth and q Y g IIIIIIIIIIIII Advocate Renton's workforce by making for people of all ages and richness of the diversity p p g IIIIIIIIIIIII Recruit and retain interests through state and Renton the municipal income levels businesses to ensure federal lobbying efforts, in our city employer of choice IIIIIIIIIIII Promote a walkable, a dynamic,diversified regional partnerships and 1111111111111 Promote understanding employment base other organizations and appreciation of IIIIIIII Develop and maintain pedestrian and bicycle- g collaborative partnerships friendly city with complete IIIIIIIIIIIII Nurture IIIIIIIIIIIII Pursue transportation diversity through and investment strategies streets,trails,and entrepreneurship and other regional celebrations and festivals that improve services connections between and foster successful improvements and 1111111111111 Provide critical and neighborhoods and partnerships with services that improve relevant information on a IIIIIII Respond to growing service demands community focal points businesses and quality of life timely basis and facilitate community leaders two-way dialogue through partnerships, IIIIIIIIIIII Provide opportunities Y IIIIIIIIIIII Balance development innovation,and outcome for communities to be 1111111111111 Leverage public/ with environmental between city governmentmanagement better prepared for private resources to focus protection and the community emergencies development on economic 1111111111111 Encourage centers volunteerism,participation and civic engagement City of,� �Jc��E °�" •s �, rvM RENTON. AHEAD OF THE CURVE.