No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA02-087 • nds ORD 4954, 4963, 4971 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, LAND USE DISTRICTS; CHAPTER 4, PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; CHAPTER 8, PERMITS AND DECISIONS; CHAPTER 9, PROCEDURES AND REVIEW CRITERIA; AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS; OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO PROVIDE A PROCESS AND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-2-060.G of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding Secure Community Transition Facilities, as shown in Exhibit A, attached. SECTION II. Section 4-2-070.Q of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding Secure Community Transition Facilities, as shown in Exhibit B, attached. SECTION III. Section 4-2-070.R of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding Secure Community Transition Facilities, as shown in Exhibit C, attached. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 8 2 • Public parks, • Public and private schools, • School bus stops, • Sports fields, or • Publicly dedicated trails. d. Be located within one mile from any SCTF, work release, prerelease, or similar facility. "Distance" referenced in paragraphs b. c. and d. of this section is measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the building in which the Secure Community Treatment Facility is to be located, to the nearest point of the zoning boundary line or property line of the lot on which the buffered use is located. The City may impose conditions to mitigate any potential adverse impact of the SCTF on surrounding uses, except that the Conditional Use Permit conditions may not impose restrictions on the SCTF greater than those set forth in RCW 71.09.285 through 91.09.340 inclusive. SECTION V. Section 4-4-080.f.10.e of Chapter 4, Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit D, attached. SECTION VI. Section 4-8-120.c of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit E, attached. SECTION VII. Sections 4-8-120.d.15 and 4-8-120.d.19 of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended by adding the following defmitions, to read as follows: 3 ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 8 2 number of sex offenders registered as homeless in a particular neighborhood, community, jurisdiction or region. 4. Adequate buffering is provided from abutting and adjacent uses. 5. Adequate security is demonstrated by the applicant. 6. Public input is provided during the siting process. SECTION IX. Section 4-11-030 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 Entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by changing the following definitions, to read as follows: Congregate Residence: Any building or portion thereof that contains facilities for living, sleeping and sanitation and may include facilities for eating and cooking for occupancy for other than a family. A congregate residence may include a boarding house, but does not include a Group Home I or II, convalescent center, jail, hotel, motel or secure community transition facility. Convalescent Centers: Facilities for patients who are recovering health and strength after illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or terminal illness where care includes ongoing medical treatment, including hospice, and extended care facilities. This definition foes not include retirement residences, adult family homes, Group Homes I and II,medical institutions, or secure community transition facilities. SECTION X. Section 4-11-070 of Chapter 11, Defmitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by changing the following definitions, to read as follows: 5 ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 8 2 SECTION XII This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2 3rd day of September , 2002. iA of i l.da.' Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2 3rd day of September , 2002. Jest anner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Wari.eii, City Attorney Date of Publication: 9/27/02 (summary) ORD.1000:9/19/02:ma 7 ORDINANCE NO. 4982 EXHIBIT B 4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM) USES: TYPE: Adult retail use P#43 AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL Big-box retail P RESOURCES Drive-in/drive-through,retail AC Natural resource extraction/recovery H#59 Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H ANIMALS &RELATED USES Retail sales P#34 Kennels P#37 Retail sales,outdoor P#30 Kennels,hobby AC#37 Vehicle sales,large P Pets,common household,up to 3 per AC Vehicle sales, small P dwelling unit or business establishment ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Entertainment OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND Adult entertainment business P#43 HOME OCCUPATIONS Cultural facilities AD Caretaker's residence AC Dance clubs P#38 Dance halls P#38 SCHOOLS Card room P#52 K-12 educational institution(public or H Gaming/gambling facilities,not-for- H#29 private) profit K-12 educational institution(public or P#9 Movie theaters P#38 private),existing Sports arenas, auditoriums,exhibition P#38 Other higher education institution P#38 halls,indoor Schools/studios,arts and crafts P#38 Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition P#38 Trade or vocational school P halls,outdoor Recreation PARKS Recreation facilities,indoor P#38 Parks,neighborhood P Recreational facilities,outdoor P#32 Parks,regional/community,existing P Parks,regional/community,new AD SERVICES Services, General OTHER COMMUNITY &PUBLIC Hotel P#38 FACILITIES Motel P#38 Community Facilities Off-site services P#38 Cemetery H On-site services P#38 Religious institutions H Drive-in/drive-through service AC#62 Service and social organizations H Vehicle rental, small P Public Facilities Vehicle and equipment rental,large P#29 City government offices AD Day Care Services City government facilities H Adult day care I P#55 Secure community transition facilities H71 Adult day care II AD Other government offices and H Day care centers P#54 facilities Family day care AC OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Healthcare Services Conference Center P#38 Medical institutions H#56 Medical and dental offices P#38 VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES Offices, general P#13 Body shops Veterinary offices/clinics P#38 Car washes P#31 Express transportation services P RETAIL Fuel dealers P ORDINANCE NO. 4982 • EXHIBIT C 4-2-070R INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH) USES: TYPE: Other government offices and H AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL facilities RESOURCES Natural resource extraction/recovery H OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Conference Center P#38 ANIMALS & RELATED USES Medical and dental offices P#38 Kennels P#37 Offices, general P#13 Kennels,hobby AC#37 Veterinary offices/clinics P#38 Pets,common household,up to 3 per AC dwelling unit or business RETAIL establishment Adult retail use P#43 Big-box retail P OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND HOME Drive-in/drive-through,retail AC OCCUPATIONS Eating and drinking establishments P Caretaker's residence AC Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#34 SCHOOLS Retail sales, outdoor P#30 K-12 educational institution(public H Vehicle sales, large P or private) Vehicle sales, small P K-12 educational institution(public P#9 or private),existing ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Other higher education institution P#38 Entertainment Schools/studios, arts and crafts P#38 Adult entertainment business P#43 Trade or vocational school H Cultural facilities AD Dance clubs P#38 PARKS Dance halls P#38 Parks,neighborhood P Card room P#52 Parks,regional/community,existing P Gaming/gambling facilities,not-for- H#38 Parks,regional/community,new AD profit Movie theaters P#38 OTHER COMMUNITY &PUBLIC FACILITIES Sports arenas, auditoriums,exhibition P#38 Community Facilities halls,indoor Cemetery H Sports arenas, auditoriums,exhibition P#38 Religious institutions H halls, outdoor Service and social organizations H Recreation Public Facilities Recreation facilities, indoor P#38 City government offices AD Recreational facilities,outdoor P#32 City government facilities H Secure community transition facilities H71 SERVICES Services, General TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C,Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts,and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements. ORDINANCE NO. 4982 EXHIBIT D SECTION 4-4-080.F.10.e Parking Standards The section setting parking standards for Public/Quasi-Public Activities is amended to add standards for Secure Community Transition Facilities. Other sections of this table are not changed. PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC ACTIVITIES: Religious institutions: 1 for each 5 seats in the main auditorium, provided that spaces for any church shall not be less than 10. For all existing churches enlarging the seating capacity of their auditoriums, 1 additional parking space shall be provided for each 5 additional seats provided by the new construction. For all churches making structural alterations or additions which do not increase the seating capacity of the auditorium, see "Outdoor and indoor sports arenas, auditoriums, stadiums places of public assembly, movie theaters, and entertainment clubs." Medical institutions: 1 for each 3 beds, plus 1 for each staff doctor, plus 1 for each 3 employees Cultural facilities: 4 for each 100 square feet in office and public use. Public post office: 0.3 for every 100 square feet. Schools: Elementary and junior high: 1 for each employee. In addition, if buses for the transportation of students are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space shall be provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. Senior high schools: public, 1 for each employee plus 1 space for each 10 parochial and private: students enrolled. In addition, if buses for the private transportation of students are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space shall be provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. Colleges and universities, arts 1 for each employee plus 1 for each 3 students and crafts schools/studios, and residing on campus, plus 1 for space for each 5 trade or vocational schools: day students not residing on campus. In addition, Submission Table Exhibit E TABLE 4-8-120C Part 1 LAND USE „ APPLICATIONS w 0 ° ° o o '° U z ao. `° 0 °q o a°a 0. t� ^� „ 0 y a. o S °J a N K a 0 a o a), ^y y .g 0. C4 P y H ,n 0 O ro 8 v • ° id O id O is cd id K N N u' U U < ' :� a. O 0 H 8 ' N c°7 V U N W -a Q 7 O 1~ a C I~ 0. O O O 00 d G .a .a a� n ,9 W N a) G 7 a 'O 'G 'O fl Oal .p ° ° r-7 SUBMITTAL w ¢ o o ¢ w w ¢ x w° w c� S REQUIREMENTS a rza cn 10%Notice of Intent to 13 a)G Annex ro co 60%Petition to Annex 13 u ca Affidavit of Installation of C • Public Information Sign z Applicant Agreement 5 5 5 4 w Statement(for wireless 3 z N communication facilities) z Applicant's Confirmation of H $4 qx Condition Compliance 0 o Application Fee per RMC 4- x x x x x x x x x x x a 1-170 m Assessment Information 1 1 ca On Authorization for Abatement 0 Binding Site Plan Map Ce Business License Application 1 E >a for Home Occupation Calculations,Survey 3 N I Colored Display Maps 1 1 1 1 1 Z Construction Mitigation 5 5 5 5 5 5 eu Description '—I Draft Deed for Any Proposed 4 4 ca Dedication of Land for Public w Purposes o Draft Homeowner's 4 4 4 4 u Association Documents,if >~ cd applicable _ Draft Restrictive Covenants, 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 aq LAND USE _ APPLICATIONS ° ° 0 = y U z ° a E z 0. o a orip au , a d o o 5 a, a, � ".. o O 0 0 am _ 0. Nc R C4 G A d p O . 4, ,a1 c o‘.0 aC.) F QO Q •L a ro 7.71 c en c a a s O O F K C. C Lt. U 0 9 2 :: Q O O ►1 pO Fd G 2 cd U , U h W U U U U ¢ tC O C✓ " '�, a a. 8 0 0 0 0 .4 �88 E E a c in K ^ K A N a 0.o •a a z z -.E. o o y y b SUBMITTAL 0. a a $ a o Q u' E a' E a a R c a > > a' °c c sZ REQUIREMENTS r 0. ¢ ,9 ¢ n o U � (5 (5w u w u u x w w at V. x a 2 e Request King County Assessor's Map 3 Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, 5 5 5 12 u a Conceptual ba Lease Agreement,Draft(for 5 5 5 .0 N wireless communication co rn facilities) o Legal Description 13 13 12 12 5 5 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 z Letter Describing Proposed 1 w Home Occupation 3 zu Letter from Property Owner 6 a)Letter to Examiner/Council 1 0 ---1 Stating Reason(s)for Appeal o o per RMC 4-8-110C3 Letter Explaining Which 12 cad Comprehen sive Plan Text/Policies Should Be up Changed and Why cd List of Affected Property 2 2 Owners within Annexation Area Boundary N List of Surrounding Property 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Owners aI Lot Line Adjustment Map 5 Mailing Labels for Property 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 4J Owners w Map of Existing Site 12 0 Conditions a Map of View Area(for 5 5 5 0 ra wireless corn munication facilities only) ro Master Application Form 13 12 12 5 5 12 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 LAND USE _ h APPLICATIONS ° a .E ° O •te u Ov O EO b t O z ��.. P. 0 a a ,, per+< 0 d x N F tC Oq tC Oq 1: L. i--, 0 N � A S. U_ z o w c0 Q O O Q 0. 0. v °� O ^-I p p ti aNi K n0.. v ^y a) c a a 0.. N 0 c c a — so _ a a T. v v a O •a H 'm a a a .2 00 .9 o ° .- a o c a -, g 1 7 c in v, a x X f3 ° A d la ci z a L a V Q] 4" 1 7 SUBMITTAL p+ 0. G y A G U E E `y 2 a -a e g UP. C c REQUIREMENTS g ¢ S a ¢ wO uQE' u uw uw° u ¢ ux w w c.Dx x - wireless communication facilities only) Short Plat Plan cn . a) Short Plat Plan,Final hO C Site Plan,Land Use Review 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 2 cli Site Plan,Shoreline Permit u N Siting Process Report for Use 12 0 G co Permits for SCTF Statement Addressing Basis ,� o for Alternate and/or 3 z Modification _ a) v Statement Addressing the a Basis for the Shoreline Permit `H a) H Exemption Request .0 Statement Addressing the Cr) o PUD's Relationship to the CO City Comprehensive Plan 0 Survey cti E Title Report or Plat 3 a) Certificate Topography Map(5 contours) 5 5 N Traffic Study 5 5 5 52 52 Tree Cutting/Vegetation 4 4 4 4 4 4 a) Clearing Plan p Tree Cutting/Vegetation Plan, 4 ae., Approved ,}, Urban Center Design Overlay 12 9 12 9 0 District Review Packet a) u Utilities Plan,Generalized 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 t; Ce Wetlands Delineation Map 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 122 -1 Wetlands Study 5 5 5 5 5 5 PP ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 5 September 23,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 368 Utility: Stoneway Concrete Water Utility Division reported the intent of the Administration to grant Plant Relocation,Additional Stoneway Concrete's request for additional time,until November 30, 2002, to Time relocate its plant outside of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area due to delays incurred during the construction of its new plant. Information. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning&Development report regarding Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF). The Committee Committee met three times in August and September to review the Planning: Secure Community recommendations of the Administration and Planning Commission on SCTF. Transition Facilities (for Level The final meeting occurred on September 19,2002,which was after the public III Sex Offenders) hearing before the Council. There were only two people who testified,one LU q 0 2-Q1 Renton citizen and a representative of the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services(DSHS). The Committee recommended that Title IV(Development Regulations)be amended to permit an SCTF as a Hearing Examiner conditional use in the IM(Medium Industrial)and IH(Heavy Industrial)zones,limited to the Employment Area Valley land use designation south of I-405, and subject to additional conditions specifying that SCTF could not: 1. house more that six persons; 2. be allowed within 330 feet of a residential zone; or 3. be allowed within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease, or similar facility. The SCTF would be located out of the "line of sight," defined as 600 feet from "risk potential activities," unless the applicant(DSHS)demonstrates through the conditional use process that obstructions to the "line of sight" occur at a lesser distance. The Committee also recommended adoption of conditional use permit findings, parking regulations,definitions and submittal requirements for the SCTF,and definitions for group homes,congregate care facilities,and convalescent facilities to clarify that an SCTF is excluded from these definitions. The Committee further recommended that the proposed SCTF ordinance be presented for first and second reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 370 for ordinance.) Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 207840-208301 and two wire transfers totaling $1,731,536.14; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 40395 -40641,one wire transfer and 564 direct deposits totaling$1,696,262.12. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services: Aquatic Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report concurring with the staff Center Design,Northwest recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a Architectural Company consultant agreement with Northwest Architectural Company to design,bid, and supervise the construction of the Renton Aquatic Center. The contract amount is$396,326. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. September 23,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 370 $64,200 for this Citywide program. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEFT.ER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See below for resolution.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3588 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Program Services, Reduction Act Implementation Agreement." MOVED BY PERSSON, King County SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: Planning: Secure Community An ordinance was read amending Chapter 2,Land Use Districts; Chapter 4, Transition Facilities(for Level Property Development Standards;Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; Chapter 9, III Sex Offenders) Procedures and Review Criteria; and Chapter 11,Definitions; of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code to provide a process and criteria for review of Secure Community Transition Facilities.* Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked that the title "Parking Regulations" be added to Exhibit D of the ordinance. *MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance#4982 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Planning: Secure Community KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE Transition Facilities(for Level ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. III Sex Offenders) The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4983 An ordinance was read amending Sections 6-6-4,6-6-8,and 6-6-9 of Chapter 6, Legal: Dangerous Dog Animals and Fowl at Large,of Title VI(Police Regulations)of City Code by Regulations amending definitions and procedures related to dangerous dogs. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Persson reported a citizen complaint concerning speeding traffic, Police: Smithers Ave S lack of sidewalks,and a ditch that floods over at the 2200 block of Smithers Speeding Problems,Lack of Ave. S.,between Talbot Rd. S. and S. 23rd St.,near Talbot Hill Elementary Sidewalks School. Mayor Tanner stated that the Police Department will investigate the speeding traffic,and the Planning/Building/Public Works Department will investigate the sidewalks and flooding. Police: Dangerous Dog Councilman Persson asked that an animal control officer investigate a residence Investigation,Talbot Rd S which houses two Rottweiler dogs located at the 2200 block of Talbot Rd. S.,to Residence determine if they are dangerous and if they are being cared for properly. Planning: South Renton Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that the South Renton Neighborhood Neighborhood Plan Plan received an award at the annual conference of the Washington Chapter of the American Planning Association, and asked that the Planning Commission members be invited to the award presentation. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Barbara Alther, first dulysworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of authority of the Renton Municipal generalpublication and is now and has been for more than six monthsprior to the date of Code. CODE AMENDMENT SECURE publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily TRANSITION FACILITIES newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a LUA-02-087,ECF legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for KingCounty. Proposed zoningc text amendment gby p g to add Secure Community The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and Transition Facilities (SCTF) which not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table stated period. The annexed notice, a in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial Code Amendment Secure Transition Facilities zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. There is currently no proposal to as published on: 8/19/02 locate such a facility in Renton. Appeals of the land use decision The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$73.50,charged to must be filed in writing on or before Acct. No. 8051067. 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee Legal Number 10710 with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the / ��� Examiner are governed by City of Legal Clerk, S uth County Journal Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.E. Additional information Subscribed and sworn before me on this//� regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City `t ay of (,2002 Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. � Published in the Sout7 County a``�a'c.II MI►7P z,OQO� (Cr---ita,k )1'\ c-7, _ I Journal August 19,2002.10710 ��.���.. �S'sio"N F,�.A..el/,,o Notary Public of the State of Washington v r c�‘� �9F,;.6,o residing in Renton __ac; ;,QTARy King County,Washington —e— y AU 3 LDS' .it: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public bvu,r,s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C-Q COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 8,2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-0 87,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: J , APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANA . Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition WORK ORDER NO: Facilities LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of I-405 SITE AREA: I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF)which is facilities for sexual! violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employmenty Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Necessary Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet t/ lwa aAe, y)l f am. ce-cb B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i-.2„,kro Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 September 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 345 3. Item#1282 "South Renton Neighborhood Sub-Area Plan" was adopted by the City Council, so it is removed from the active project list. 4. Item#1486 "Growth Management Act—King County 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments" was completed with a letter to King County Office of Policy Planning outlining City concerns with a number of the proposed amendments. 5. Item#1632 "Animal Keeping Standards" is referred to the annual Title IV docket. 6. Item#1644 "Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process" was completed with the adoption of Ordinance 4975 and is removed from the referral list. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Secure Community MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER,COUNCIL Transition Facilities(for Level SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 16,2002,TO CONSIDER III Sex Offenders) SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES. CARRIED. L'A of-ggl Court Case: Sound Transit, Councilman Parker congratulated City staff for their efforts in reaching a CRT-02-008 settlement with Sound Transit regarding its request for an easement from the City of Renton. (See page 341,Administrative Report,for additional information regarding this matter.) Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 207001 -207499 and three wire transfers totaling $2,295,216.20;and approval of Payroll Vouchers 39777-40104,one wire transfer and 567 direct deposits totaling$1,793,369.72. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 207500-207839 and one wire transfer totaling$2,938,347.32; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 40105 -40394,one wire transfer and 565 direct deposits totaling$1,742,688.35. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Vice Chair Corman presented a report Committee regarding the bid results for the Traffic Management Center project. The CAG: 02-118,Traffic Committee was briefed on the Traffic Management Center bid on September 5, Management Center 2002. After careful consideration, the Committee concurred in the recommendation of staff to take no action on the results of the original bidding of the project. Per the recommendation of the City Attorney,the project is being re-bid and the results of the second bidding will be placed on the Council Consent Agenda. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the I S day of /q'LtAj tit S f , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealk�d enf�velope containir1 E IQ- IJG•ht rIMI r1Atl vh documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing S-e_ ft74C 'LLc LA • (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that AL-clve - ! e E I I,l,(.J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. f Dat d;.cb,,( 41 ,,,p _ � 1( MARiL.y KAMChEFF Notary Public in and for the State of Washington NOTARY PUBLIC ' Notary(Print) MARILYNKAMCHFFF STATE OF 29, 200GTON ! My appointment ep�piraILvN MFnrr EXPIRFS•6. s�rta COMMISSION EXPIRES JUKE 29, 2003 Project Name: Co & i'�� t'U I^-tsa44 &c �,rt L¢. mA . T r•*A3 i fi on I-etc.' I;tie s Project Number: LU oL -087. Ec-F NOTA}W.DOC AGENCY(DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015— 172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 3190— 160th Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98092 Bellevue,WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2nd Avenue, 10th Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE— Municipal Land Planner KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01W Seattle,WA 98104 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM • Uti�Y �� ��N CUB NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) • DATE: July 26,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-087,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition Facilities PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial end Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria Including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release, prerelease or similar facility.The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020:1)330 ft.,2)1000 II.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined In the state statute.There Is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. PROJECT LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of I.405 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE:As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of he Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 28,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 26,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: N/A Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Coy Council in August,date to be Determined CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: This project Is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rebecca Lind,Principal Planner,EDNSP,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on August 8,2002.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rebecca Lind(425)430-6588 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project,complete this form and retum to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File No/Name:LUA-02-087,ECF I Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition Facilities NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPUCAnON • . +,E. fKAMCHEFF I'�?:lARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES I (( l JUNE 29, 2003 I, E • ©C�f iV 1 , hereby certify that �r copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on O Al\n � � • Signed: 2I) tat �C/�'1'�- ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for tit e of Washington residing i�u2 -n ,on the 22 day of '� �o2-- MARILYN �FF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 NOITCE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION CODE AMENDMENT SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES LUA-02-087,ECF The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405.The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes en analysis of 3 options for buffering from'risk potential activities'as defined in RCW 71.09.020:1)330 h.,2) 1000 It.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined In the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2,2002. If no appeals are filed by this date,the action will become final. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. e�h'v.14caat MARILYN 14,AMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I, E - C)C-WC.l 1 ,hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by mg 42 cQ spicuous places on or nearby the described property on SV l t 2,.. SignecV �1 ki.rm u ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the fate of Washington residing irr c0 0,-1 ,on the 27-nd_ day of Q. -1- ,tit a00.›. MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 August 12,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 320 that the problems created by seaplanes have increased this year. He suggested that the increase may stem from 1)the new airport manager not being aware of past problems,and 2)reconstruction of the seaplane dock. Mr.Evans described two occasions when seaplanes started their takeoff within 100 yards of the dock,and asked for the City's help in reducing the problems associated with seaplanes. Mayor Tanner recommended reconvening the committee and discussing the issue with the seaplane operators. He stated that the City of Renton has no authority over the matter,explaining that the Coast Guard has authority over navigable water,and the Federal Aviation Administration has jurisdiction in air space. He added that the most Renton can do is to try to improve the situation through volunteer means. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of August 5,2002. Council concur. August 5,2002 CAG: 01-201,Downtown Community Services Department recommended approval of a change order in Parking Garage, Security the amount of$79,157.74 to CAG-01-201,Downtown Parking Garage System Installation construction contract,for Convergint Technologies to install the security system. Refer to Finance Committee. \..Planning: Secure Community Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Transition Facilities (for Level recommended approval of an ordinance regulating Secure Community III Sex Offenders) Transition Facilities land uses, which are facilities for Level III sex offenders. L1&A ©Z-08.7 Refer to Planning&Development Committee and Planning Commission. Utility: 2002 Utility Systems Utilities Systems Division requested a briefing on the proposed 2003 Utility Division Proposed CIP Systems Division Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Refer to Utilities Committee. Utility: Utility Fee Code Utilities Systems Division recommended approval of the proposed amendments Amendments to the Utility Fee Code(Renton Municipal Code 4-1-180)which will arrange the Code in a more logical format,combine similar language from the three utilities, and make the language more readable. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Vice Chair Persson presented a report recommending Finance Committee approval of Claim Vouchers 206556-207000 and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $2,410,742.04;and approval of Payroll Vouchers 39455 -39776,one wire transfer and 568 direct deposits totaling$1,848,326.99. MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Nelson pointed out the presence of excessive weed growth Transportation: Weed Growth on many street medians and asked that City staff investigate the matter. on Street Medians Councilwoman Briere noted weed growth on the median located at the corner of S. 2nd St. and Main Ave. S. Finance: Home Kidney Responding to Council President Nelson's inquiry regarding reduced water Dialysis,Reduced Water Rates rates for home kidney dialysis patients,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman reported that the City does not have reduced water rates for home dialysis patients but does provide reduced rates for low- N.01-110E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION CODE AMENDMENT SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES LUA-02-087,ECF The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft., and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2,2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CODE AMENDMENT SECURE TRANSITION FACILITIES LUA-02-087,ECF Proposed zoning text amendment to add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: August 19, 2002 Account No. 51067 dnspub 41 CITY ( RENTON ..� - Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 14, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 13, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CODE AMENDMENT SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES LUA-02-087,ECF The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations, operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons, not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from "risk potential activities" as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft., 2) 1000 ft., and 3) within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6588. For the Environmental Review Committee, Abeek, 17), Rebecca Lind Principal Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON Agency Letter\ ,� AHEAD OF THE CURVE j This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-087, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Code Amendment Secure Community Transition Facilities DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations, operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons, not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from "risk potential activities" as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft., 2) 1000 ft., and 3) within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Potential locations Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan Designation South of 1-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date,the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 19, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: August 13, 2002 SIGNATURES: llin ,a S 7-A/Z-, G eg im man, ninfsl ator DATE Departme t f PI ing/Building/Public Works Ji epherd, Administrator DATar//0/c> C munity Services Department 8/s/z._ Le Wheeler, Fire Chief DAT Renton Fire Department Documentl CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-087, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Code Amendment Secure Community Transition Facilities DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations, operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons, not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from "risk potential activities" as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft., 2) 1000 ft., and 3) within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Potential locations Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan Designation South of 1-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 19, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: August 13, 2002 SIGNATURES: G eg im ma , rin�ator DATE 4//.77/‘12. Departme t f PI ing/Building/Public Works A:a/c)2___ cJi epherd, Administrator DAT ,—C munity Services Department ,er—c_e_r_.4_,_ e:., ,,...4----____ SEAA Le Wheeler, Fire Chief DAT Renton Fire Department Documentl ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE AUGUST 13, 2002 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Chateau de Ville Condominiums (Fiala) LUA-02-083, SA-A, ECF The applicant is proposing to develop a four story, 50 unit, condominium building of one and two bedroom units. Two courtyards and landscaped areas (over 8,000 square feet total) surround the perimeter of the site. A total of 75 parking stalls would be provided in the basement level of the structure with ramp access directly off of Williams Avenue South. The south portion of the site is currently developed with a single-family residence, which is proposed to be demolished as part of the project. The subject property is located within the Residential Multi-family - Urban (RM-U) zoning designation, as well as the Urban Center Design Overlay District and Downtown Core. The project is subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan Review and Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines. Location: 110 Williams Avenue South. Title IV Code Amendment—Secure Transition Facilities (Lind) LUA-02-087, ECF The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations, operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons, not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from "risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft., 2) 1000 ft., and 3) within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. Location: Employment Area Valley, south of 1-405. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson, EDNSP Administrator A Pietsch, EDNSP Director® J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman, Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention ® J.Medzegian,Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney ® STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 13,2002 Project Name: Code Amendment Secure Community Transition Facilities Project Number: LUA-02-087, ECF Project Manager: Rebecca Lind Project Description: The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF),which are facilities for sexually violent offenders,to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft., 2) 1000 ft.,and 3) within the line of sight as defined in the state statute Project Location: Potential locations Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan Designation South of 1-405. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: N/A Site Area:N/A B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. None Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. No applicable notes. ERCREPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report CODE AMENDMENT SECURE TRANSITiuiv FACILITIES LUA-02-087,ECF August 13,2002 Page2 of 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: None Mitigation Measures: Nexus: 2. Air Impacts: None Mitigation Measures: Nexus: 3. Water Impacts: None Mitigation Measures: Nexus: E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Document2 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5,2002 TO: Toni Nelson,President City Council Members • FROM: Sue Carlson,Administrator Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner SUBJECT: Secure Community Transition Facilities ISSUE: By September 2001,Washington State counties and cities must decide whether to amend their comprehensive plans and development regulations to provide for siting"Secure Community Transition Facilities"(SCTS), in accordance with ESSB 6594 enacted March 2002. These are facilities for Level III sex offenders.The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services(DSHS)has the authority to "preempt"jurisdictions that fail to complete the required planning by October 1,2002, and pursue their own siting process. • Should the City of Renton add the new use to the zoning regulations and enact development standards to guide siting and development of this use? Or • Should The City allow DSHS to pre-empt local land use and take responsibility for siting these facilities? • Due to the time frame allowed for consideration of a draft ordinance, should the issue be exempted from the annual Title IV docket review process and forwarded to the Planning Commission and Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation? RECOMMENDATION: • Consider Option 3, as outlined later in this document,after review and comment from DSHS.If this approach complies with the State statute,the proposed ordinance provides the most comprehensive approach to regulating SCTF land uses.This approach both limits this use to a section of the City (the Valley, south of 1-405) that has the least impact on residential areas and provides a reasonable amount of potential acreage for siting opportunities. • August 5, 2002 • Page 2 • Option 2(text definitions) as outlined later in this document,be considered as a minimal response, if the State DSHS comments that Option 3 is overly regulatory. • Due to the short time until the October ls`deadline, it is recommended that the City Council make a finding to consider this code amendment as a exemption to the Title IV docket amendment process set forth in Title IV 4-9-025c, and refer the issue to the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee for review. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: This background summary is excerpted from the City of Kent Staff report to the Kent Land Use and Planning Board July 22,2002 by Charlene Anderson,Planning Manager. "Senate Bill ESSB 6594 enacted March 2002 (amending ESSB 6151 which was enacted June 2001) requires cities to provide for siting of secure community transition facilities (SCTF) by September 1, 2002. Changes to state law occurred as a result of a 1991 civil rights complaint and 1994 federal court order requiring the McNeil Island total confinement facility to provide residents with "constitutionally adequate mental health treatment." This means that residents who are ready for conditional release must have an opportunity for less restrictive alternative placement. SCTFs provide sexual offenders with living arrangements that are less restrictive than total confinement. An SCTF has "...supervision and security, and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services"(RCW 71.09.020). The 2002 Legislature provided an appropriation to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)for the implementation of ESSB 6594 and also allowed the state to `preempt and supersede local plans, development regulations, permitting requirements, inspection requirements, and all other laws as necessary... "for failure to comply. However,failure to act by the September 1, 2002 deadline is not a condition for fiscal sanctions, appeals to the Growth Management Hearings Board, or a private cause of action. Reference attached ESSB 6594 amended the Growth Management Act to include SCTFs in the list of facilities that typically are difficult to site and that are deemed "essential public facilities" (RCW 36.70A.200 "GMA'). As directed by GMA, cities must have a process for identifying and siting these facilities." State law requires SCTFs to provide a high degree of security and staff supervision. Security measures include court conditions,proximity to risk locations, intensive staffing, closer supervision and escorts, household security systems, intensive training for qualified staff, informed staff and escorts, requiring advance planning for community trips, and individual electronic monitoring devices. The law also requires the City to consider the effect of "equitable distribution factors" on the siting of a facility. Consideration will be given to the City's number and location of existing residential facilities operated by the Department of Corrections or the Mental Health Division of DSHS, the number of registered sex offenders classified as level II or level III, and the number of sex offenders registered as homeless in the City. "Equitable distribution"means avoiding a disproportionate grouping of similar facilities in any one jurisdiction. The new SCTF law provides that such facilities may not be sited within the line of sight of any risk potential activities or facilities, i.e., those activities and facilities where the public has a higher incidence of risk from persons who are conditionally released from the special commitment center. The risk potential activities and facilities include schools, licensed day care and preschool facilities,public parks,publicly dedicated trails,playgrounds, sports fields, recreational and community centers, school bus stops, religious facilities, and public libraries. IssuePaper August 5, 2002 Page 3 ANALYSIS Renton's Comprehensive Plan addresses essential public facilities and allows for adoption of development standards establishing both review criteria and mapping for SCTF as defined by ESSB 6594. As a result further comprehensive plan amendments are not needed at this time. Land Use Policy LU-233: "Guide and modify development of essential public facilities to meet Comprehensive Plan policies and to mitigate impacts and costs to the City. " Land Use Policy LU-234: "Use public processes and create criteria to ident public facilities. Public processes should include notification, hearings and citizen involvement. Criteria should be developed to review and assess proposals for public facilities". Renton does allow Group Homes I in the Commercial Arterial (CA)and Center Downtown (CD)Zones with a Conditional Use permit, and Group Homes II with fewer than six residents as a permitted use in all zones. With more than seven residents, Group Homes II requires a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit. As presently defined, Group Homes I are rehabilitative facilities that may include halfway houses and/or substance abuse recovery homes. A Group Home II is a protective residency which may include housing for mentally and physically disabled persons, foster child care, shelter,orphanages, and other uses where residents are deemed vulnerable and/or disabled and are not a threat to self or to public safety. It is possible that an interpretation of our current code by DSHS could allow location of SCTF facilities under these existing definitions. According to King County Registered Sex Offender web site data updated July 31, 2002, the City of Renton has 12 Level III and 17 Level II registered sex offenders. The Griffin Home, located on Lake Washington Blvd. is a Group Home II facility that houses juvenile offenders including some sex offenders. It is operated by the Friends of Youth, a private non-profit organization. Since this facility is not operated by DSHS or the Department of Corrections, it is not clear whether Renton will receive any "credit" for this facility when it calculates "equitable distribution factors". DSHS sent the City Geographic Information Systems (GIS)data providing location of the risk potential facilities in Renton and the surrounding area,referenced by the new law. A map of the risk potential facilities is attached. Staff is proposing the following options for consideration: 1) No Change Under this option, SCTF would be potentially classified as Class I Group Homes and allowed in the CA and CD zoning districts by Conditional Use Permit. Concerns about this option include the desirability of this use in these locations,the limited number of available parcels and the possibility of State preemption because of the perceived "more restrictive" criteria from State law. It is also possible DSHS would interpret the SCTF as excluded from the Group Home I definition and determine that Renton has no regulation. In that case,pre-emption would likely occur. 2) Text Amendment Definitions This option proposes an ordinance amendment only to the definitions section of Title IV. A definition of SCTF is proposed as follows: IssuePaper August 5, 2002 Page 5 Staff has completed a preliminary GIS analysis of this proposed use as it might occur in the Valley under Option 3. Although Renton's draft ordinance states that these uses must be 330 feet from residential uses,this provision is anticipated to have little impact on the actual siting of the facilities as there are no residential uses in this area within Renton. The only existing residential use in the area that would trigger this requirement is located in Tukwila. A future residential Transit Oriented Development project is currently under consideration in Tukwila,however the entire area adjacent to that proposal is in the Commercial Office(CO) zone and would not be eligible for SCTF siting. Staff evaluated a buffer area of both 330 feet and 1000 feet as a proxy for the site distance criteria in the state regulations did. We realize that the actual site distance would be calculated at the time a specific site was selected and might be either greater or less than the 330 feet. However,with a distance of 1000 feet, 130 acres would be available.With a distance of 330 feet, 396 acres would be available. The breakdown by zone, after wetlands are excluded from the calculations, is shown on the table below. 330 ft. Buffer Zone Area (acres) Wetlands Total Developable CA 32.90 0.95 31.95 IL 149.12 19.75 129.37 IM 174.19 19.55 154.64 I H 91.08 10.19 80.89 1000 ft. Buffer Zone Area (acres) Wetlands Total Developable CA 8.19 0.54 7.65 IL 59.52 16.27 43.25 IM 65.54 0.10 65.44 IH 14.15 0.35 13.80 The attached map of the Employment Area Valley south of I-405 illustrates this distance from"risk potential activities"using both the 1000-foot and 330-foot standard. At this time we do not have knowledge of another work release,pre-release or similar facility located within one mile of this area, but believe that if one were established in either Kent or Tukwila, or at another location in Renton, that this standard would provide reasonable spacing between facilities. CONCLUSION: To provide for the overall protection of the public welfare a more specific regulatory approach to siting SCTF land uses is desirable provided that the buffering and review criteria can be upheld. The risk of preemption by the State is not worth the possibility of losing control of project design and inspection responsibilities. cc Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Garry Anderson Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts IssuePaper CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, LAND USE DISTRICTS; CHAPTER 4, PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; CHAPTER 8, PERMITS AND DECISIONS; CHAPTER 9, PROCEDURES AND REVIEW CRITERIA; AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS; OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO PROVIDE A PROCESS AND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-2-060.G of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION II. Section 4-2-070.L of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit B. SECTION III. Section 4-2-070.Q of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit C. SECTION IV. Section 4-2-070.R of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit D. 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI. Section 4-4-080.F.10.e of Chapter 4, Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit E. SECTION VII. Section 4-8-120.0 of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit F. SECTION VIII. Sections 4-8-120.D.15 and 19 of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended by adding the following definitions, to read as follows: Operating Rules Proposal for Secure Community Treatment Facility (SCTF): A written proposal outlining the scope of operations of a secure community transition facility, including but not limited to daily operating hours, activities of occupants, procedures for off-site activities, in any, and visitation procedures for non-residents, including professional care providers, family members, or other service providers. Siting process report for Use permits for Secure Community Treatment Facility (SCTF): A narrative report describing in detail the process used to evaluate alternative sites for the proposed SCTF activity and the basis for the recommendation to locate the facility at the recommended site. A minimum of three alternative sites shall be addressed. SECTION IX. Section 4-9-030 of Chapter 9, Procedures and Review Criteria, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 3 ORDINANCE NO. Convalescent Centers: Facilities for patients who are recovering health and strength after illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or terminal illness where care includes ongoing medical treatment, including hospice, and extended care facilities. This definition foes not include retirement residences, adult family homes, group homes I and II, medical institutions, or secure community transition facilities. SECTION XI. Section 4-11-070 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by changing the following definitions, to read as follows: Group Home I (Rehabilitation): A facility or dwelling unit housing persons, unrelated by blood or marriage and operating as a group facility household. A rehabilitative group home may include halfway houses and substance abuse recovery homes. This definition does not include congregate residential and secure community transition facilities. Group Home II (Protective Residency): A facility or dwelling unit housing persons, including resident staff, unrelated by blood or marriage and operating as a group family household. Staff persons provide care, education, and participation in community activities for the residents with the primary goal of enabling the resident to live as independently as possible. A protective residency may include disabled (mentally and physically) persons, foster child care, abused women shelter, orphanages and other uses where residents are deemed vulnerable and/or disabled and are not a threat to self or to public health or safety. This definition does not include congregate residential or secure community transition facilities. SECTION XII. Section 9-11-190, Definitions "S," of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 5 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1000:7/8/02:ma • EXHIBIT B 4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) USES: TYPE: City government offices AD AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL City government facilities H RESOURCES Other government offices and H Natural resource extraction/recovery H facilities Secure transition community facilities H71 ANIMALS&RELATED USES Kennels,hobby AC#37 OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Pets,common household,up to 3 per AC Conference Center P#38 dwelling unit or business Medical and dental offices P establishment Offices,general P Veterinary offices/clinics P RESIDENTIAL Attached dwelling P#18 RETAIL Adult retail use P#43 OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND Big-box retail P HOME OCCUPATIONS Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Group homes I H Eating and drinking establishments P Group homes II for 7 or more H Horticultural nurseries H Home occupations AC#6 Retail sales P Retail sales, outdoor P SCHOOLS Taverns P K-12 educational institution(public or H#9 Vehicle sales, large P#41 private) Vehicle sales, small P K-12 educational institution(public or P#9 private),existing ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Other higher education institution P Entertainment Schools/studios,arts and crafts P Adult entertainment business P#43 Trade or vocational school H Cultural facilities AD Dance clubs P PARKS Dance halls P Parks,neighborhood P Card room P#52 Parks,regional/community, existing P Gaming/gambling facilities, not-for- H Parks,regional/community,new AD profit Movie theaters P OTHER COMMUNITY& PUBLIC Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition P FACILITIES. halls, indoor Community Facilities Sports arenas,auditoriums, exhibition AD Cemetery H halls,outdoor Religious institutions H Recreation Service and social organizations H Recreation facilities, indoor P Public Facilities Recreational facilities, outdoor H TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C,Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts,and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements. • EXHIBIT D 4-2-070R INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH) USES: TYPE: OFFICE AND CONFERENCE AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL Conference Center P#38 RESOURCES Medical and dental offices P#38 Natural resource extraction/recovery 1-1 Offices,general P#13 Veterinary offices/clinics P#38 ANIMALS&RELATED USES Kennels P#37 RETAIL Kennels,hobby AC#37 Adult retail use P#43 Pets, common household,up to 3 per AC Big-box retail P dwelling unit or business Drive-in/drive-through,retail AC establishment Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND HOME Retail sales P#34 OCCUPATIONS Retail sales,outdoor P#30 Caretaker's residence AC Vehicle sales, large P Vehicle sales, small P SCHOOLS K-12 educational institution(public or H ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION private) Entertainment K-12 educational institution(public or P#9 Adult entertainment business P#43 private), existing Cultural facilities AD Other higher education institution P#38 Dance clubs P#38 Schools/studios,arts and crafts P#38 Dance halls P#38 Trade or vocational school H Card room P#52 Gaming/gambling facilities,not-for- H#38 PARKS profit Parks,neighborhood P Movie theaters P#38 Parks,regional/community, existing P Sports arenas,auditoriums,exhibition P#38 Parks,regional/community,new AD halls,indoor Sports arenas, auditoriums,exhibition P#38 OTHER COMMUNITY& PUBLIC FACILITIES halls,outdoor Community Facilities Recreation Cemetery H Recreation facilities, indoor P#38 Religious institutions H Recreational facilities,outdoor P#32 Service and social organizations H Public Facilities SERVICES City government offices AD Services, General City government facilities H Hotel P#38 Other government offices and H Motel P#38 facilities Off-site services P#38 Secure transition community facilities H71 On-site services P#38 Drive-in/drive-through service AC#62 TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions;RMC 4-3-050.C,Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts,and RMC 4-3-090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements. Submission Table Exhibit F TABLE 4-8-120C Part 1 LAND USE „ APPLICATIONS a. .� c v. c z c E 8 € d o a R p c�> o. 2 u ate. N a .1-.... y 3 3 >, V Q 0 o o on m en ,C .C) •€ - — O a p p o A aC) N d 0 d 0 d y a> ..- 0.� f� C1. y 6 N A A N a .. U F- 4 ' ¢ `a a .? 0 . A ❑ ❑ a a s La. O O W O c�v aCi c=d C `' C W v ac FE i V U_ o ¢ .1,, 2 , p F- � N '� a E a o °o _o °o o o on -� -a v� n W axi q axi at0i c a 0.y n. v 'c z' v E 'v C .� .P a�> O c c `1 2 2 > SUBMITTAL w c =' a a o f o o o o ° o °� c c ° E C) C o `d ro REQUIREMENTS E-' a- < c ¢ < m o U ¢ U 3 ". 3 w 3 ¢ 3 x w w a. (D se x ..4 " 10%Notice of Intent to 13 Annex 60%Petition to Annex 13 Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign Applicant Agreement 5 5 5 Statement(for wireless communication facilities) l Applicant's Confirmation of Condition Compliance Application Fee per RMC 4- x x x x x x x x x x x 1-170 Assessment Information 1 1 Authorization for Abatement Binding Site Plan Map Business License Application 1 for Home Occupation Calculations,Survey 3 Colored Display Maps 1 1 1 1 1 Construction Mitigation 5 5 5 5 5 5 Description Draft Deed for Any Proposed 4 4 Dedication of Land for Public Purposes Draft Homeowner's 4 4 4 4 Association Documents,if applicable LAND USE C. APPLICATIONS ° C U o o o 0) z € N 0 V.V C 0. � C. .. «. >.0 N z o ¢ 'a � 'a a 0 ° ao e c a ON ^ acL Q; An. cocu N d 0a. > y N A CC .]Q F ti '� 0. E 0. 0 p O p O O to .a O fn Vl x c "° v ° a az z F. '�a 'o .2 c c :a >SUBMITTAL aa a a 'EZ u E E a d a td a Ry a 8 > '> a c a l, N REQUIREMENTS a - < a wo 6 6 6w 6w (5 ¢ ( LE w ' e i' i Justification for Rezone Justification for Variance Request King County Assessor's Map 3 Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, 5 5 5 12 Conceptual Lease Agreement,Draft(for 5 5 5 wireless communication facilities) Legal Description 13 13 12 12 5 5 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 Letter Describing Proposed 1 Home Occupation Letter from Property Owner Letter to Examiner/Council 1 Stating Reason(s)for Appeal per RMC 4-8-110C3 Letter Explaining Which 12 Comprehen sive Plan Text/Policies Should Be Changed and Why List of Affected Property 2 2 Owners within Annexation Area Boundary List of Surrounding Property 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Owners Lot Line Adjustment Map 5 Mailing Labels for Property 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . 2 Owners Map of Existing Site 12 Conditions Map of View Area(for 5 5 5 ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 LAND USE _ u ^ APPLICATIONS 4) —o c c c) O u CO o L N .. .. a. at F.,, = a .' u _ c a aat o . 8 4) E n to is on 1= .v a O Uz 0. ,.O. CO Q O -F. O2 -pCp w w 0) & a5i 0 £ ai o c c= QQ ° co U a a il s -� o n F c ' ) ¢ ) ° 7,1 ▪.. o o c2 = c N c E a nF �. N � E a o o o '� o c c c c c .o SUBMITTAL aw o C c a a E °cE) E c c c o c .� c c - o � ,9 d < &) 6 (5 ¢ c� c� w v w c) ¢ v " w r5 a c. ae ,� 5 5 S REQUIREMENTS °- Form l Screening Detail, 12 12 12 12 12 12 Refuse/Recycling Security Plan for Use Permits 12 for SCTF Service Area Map(for 5 5 wireless communication facilities only) Short Plat Plan Short Plat Plan,Final _ Site Plan,Land Use Review 12 12 12 12 12 2 122 Site Plan,Shoreline Permit Siting Process Report for Use 12 Permits for SCTF Statement Addressing Basis for Alter nate and/or Modification Statement Addressing the Basis for the Shoreline Permit Exemption Request Statement Addressing the PUD's Relationship to the City Comprehen sive Plan Survey _ Title Report or Plat 3 Certificate _ _ Topography Map(5 contours) 5 5 Traffic Study 5 5 _ 5 52 52 Tree Cutting/Vegetation 4 4 4 4 4 4 Clearing Plan Tree Cutting/Vegetation Plan, 4 Approved ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 5 S Table 4-8-120C Legend: 1.This information is required only forthose home occupations that will have customer visits,more than six(6)busi ness deliveries per week,or external indication of commercial activity. 2.Level of detail limited to scope listed in RMC 4-9-210A. 3.Level of detail required may be reduced by Administrator. 4.For conditional use permit applications for wireless communication facilities,the applicant shall submit a prelimi nary sketch(five(5) copies)for preliminary staff review prior to submittal of the conditional use permit application.The staff shall review this map within fourteen(14)working days and inform applicant of any preliminary concerns and recommendations for revisions at a scheduled preapplication meeting.The staff shall also indicate where photo simulations will be required for the application submittal,and may choose to waive submittal requirements for the conditional use permit when deemed appropriate.This shall not preclude the staff from making further recommenda tions at the application stage. 5.Only required for projects requiring a public hearing. 6.Only required for residential projects requesting modification to special development standards in a Centers Residential Demonstration District RMC 4-3-120B3,or for any development subject to special development standards requiring upper story setbacks in the Center Office Residential 3(COR 3)Zone,RMC 4-2-120B. 7.Not required for Land Use Review Site Plan Level II. 8.Land Use Review Site Plan,Level I and/or Level II,as appropriate. 9.Only required for projects requiring review in the Urban Center Design Overlay District. (Ord.4587,3-18-1996;Amd.Ord.4722,5-11-1998;Ord.4777,4-19-1999;Ord.4802,10-25-1999;Ord.4821,1-24-2000) Number of required copies(if any)is indicated in each column unless waived by the Development Services Division. ' Y, Pr' \\', ' tit _ ,,. T t ` Tr t — Rj __MA u4 wr -- ii r l�,,;..::, \•I „., a' �,Cn, x:� 0 9 t,, ,•a r �� i I 1 II 11 b' '�' ``0 ya. 1 i .. /' !/ '3! ,`A ♦ .'1, _ 1 .. , , \ ' - _ , ..,-'„..,,,,,,. •` .•:•vim N t - •V_J — � c: : Y.t... - • off,` 1 • I ;- / /l i` ,YV / I 1 ,t _ _ ilitil tN. , t y r f f(' o�� wa a �• 1 1a 1.,- I l •. •-•.'.� ..._...------ -- - - - 3 z7a ~.'e�,y�lig ✓a�� '- I 1 - c l vC I to -� 1�c, i 1 1 I 19s62 �.ti iC 1l :.y1."43�a ••'f•4' rrr ,',,,,X I,--- — -r_ r•� f,� i . .. 1 • JI s . r s.l `. j \\ `r' M1 yy$ +mac ' .V I'- >iJ I'' � '�l` r �h , I. IL 'Y r•F....a:``M 1 .-.__' I� ... . I ::: I r, t�v A}L .. 7.7r18 ''S) { t /' {11. I; y.)- A, • ,�`t,7 '} ..- ,et' - ''' I /1 : J{ iR ✓� ' sib� 1,044 , _ 1 t � * o C v / �i, 1 dfk;•> Ysue-! P ' /♦, Fr 3 k...nm t I i I.w m Q .:3pt S ' e •I. z i ce..\ 'icc - -. ;>1� r 3 y > , ' \ .I -- r•-.',aA,',✓W.,O1;It•.. ,'',. r f t ,rr I. c z, 1 3 A!' 4e. ! /. \ ; iitnti. `,'gt ; 41''''' q Pip SL1 '' ,;r , •-0A o k r ,'r j /// i / . I i j a . ;'��o I j \I 7 . . I . �l I I 11 i S I II I / � 1Renton SCTF 1500 3000 1 1 330 ft. buffer � CA-Commercial Arterial 1 : 1 g°°° s I 1 IL-Industrial Light I'`-,-.- 1 IM-Industrial Medium MIS IH-Industrial Heavy I I DSHS identified at-risk parcel Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning "'"^''' Wetlands y 330 ft.buffer from DSHS identified at risk parcels S Del Ro n, dministrotor Q _ City Limits Identified trail 12 July 2002 'Area excludes wetlands and is shown in saes mom Proposed Strander Extension I I 330 ft.buffer from identified trails • II 4. i s 4 _. t ��, `��°,�.'0..rS fY�a,.`♦o. '✓ate .. I( I t� 1 o�.JfYrla -�•'�'_-==- I :------^ �'[+ + ✓� -Div,._, sa-svo. ,'�O♦�� �� I _ ._.., 1 ( SG „ti y\ .:7.'4 Otb '�4414.✓,Z:,Or Op� ti, �✓�Y�r 1 1 `_ L f---=_-=i- ,`.... ..� \_lJ ` •'• ',g4ie :.*.i '1,y ��24 Q:'1�0.0�♦O° OT`A���.` �':341.0 y I� II it \\ • i I 0'i• ♦!` ♦ `✓ OQ a:' A'+ 1 I , '� +'+�� r'+. ♦t.y��r��, ��+4e''O•}A�♦pN�O��� �`VP,'✓+�'4°AJ I�- �.. i - .1�; i `.' .�•, ;.4. A♦ �> �i;0v°4•'''°00> O/C},►O1O°•+c' C:t t j c_. • •,�\ - - �/ 1 q °pA',py';�y�pyy,4 ,�° �` ,.�1 +� ;b'C `�:Vi .� II It_=_ \\-4 '+ „_, ^, • �•',-' -^ ::-lit•• - . `O OtO�`- `\ •-. `-off ;Z9A- /��,`��, �°y�•_Jtlr.__! - ♦• 3 7 1 \ :''.°�w}.J°L "'^F 'Sb q .0i° :r• pp�pr•�r11$• %l.- 11' • is „.... t..• ,..-, {A� • b 1 t ' 1 .l O✓ '+sa < ', =_J - wry o L. `+ ✓> •.+4✓ . i 't t _ ::�C� ...„ �ii I - l Ib \ �iL—.,F I1 f I • 1 `\Y \\is • Aii I! •- ` ` i ::�: T3 k"_.. L .a a a4' .x�.•Ola44,', A�•:' a�i 1 i i .tI ,y y „a _�(._-_ I '"-," rt e!.,\_'•'">~•'"$eO�>°°q - - 1. A° �I•°fir • 'I it L ✓,• M4 I ,. �qA° .°r 5..,f` .• g:::: a,i .a I ,.,t- 5 i' � o+°ti A;�O✓✓0.,e°ro ti q✓@DPd'or��/Y t@ti L'J ♦• � i ... ._ ~ :✓ s -8 �j`,,��s�,+,,'r Of''z'-'��✓SNnA ? n''<,• a�A�r • _I �x ,Z ✓b° _ ,,` °4 O ,1 ° 0�r ` ` 'Imo' `S pY� s'44 $f ,. 4ry��AQ444�b I 4. �604,10 ? 3 > .y ;a-Y �„ ? x . _.b, .aa ✓•G , ° .� .494 • ....! _;11••• • r' Op���� a_ � � "£� Px.: � K�bi ; p,� �♦ ✓%I 4 °,°♦q1Oqf � Dvo y�� .r �s I C�r 0 ♦° O ✓a 4•. z °✓ ' ✓bs O�iQj �°��a:f • • ✓P {mo ° % d� '4b ' � .fa6 RO �!S eOr I1- - • f°q q/ °q ! x ♦ ?4hy ✓ ie P� I xx. � ` ---- .._-.____. L ory1Y''VQG°41► � ��������� — _t ,_ - / /.. Zil III kr,M,14.1.,,r-* qf � v f . . 7 I. : lit qqV 6 Renton SCTF 0 1500 3000 • 1000 ft. buffer CA-Commercial Medal 1 : 18000 ;3 I I IL-Industrial Light I' I IM-Industrial Medium MEI IN-Industrial Heavy I J DSHS identified at-risk parcel Economic Developmentlstrator rt. ri /Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning - Wetlands 1000 ft.buffer from DSHS identified at-risk parcels Sue Carlson, Admin C. Del Rosario 12 lY 2002 -—- CityLimits Y Identified trail Proposed Strander Extension I I 1000 ft.buffer from identified trails 'Area excludes wetlands and is shown in acres RCW 71.09.285 states that "in no case shall the [DSHS] policy guidelines permit location of a facility adjacent to, immediately across a street or parking lot from, or within the line of sight of a risk potential activity or facility in existence at the time a site is listed for consideration." It goes on to define "within the line of sight" as meaning "that it is possible to reasonably visually distinguish and recognize individuals." DSHS recently completed field tests to determine what linear distance is a reasonable measure of an unobstructed line of sight. In our tests, we determined that an individual might reasonably visually distinguish and recognize other individuals who are standing within 600 feet, assuming the terrain is unobstructed. We suggest that you amend your proposed ordinance with wording something like this: In no case shall a secure community transition facility be sited adjacent to, immediately across the street or parking lot from, or within the line of sight of risk potential activities or facilities in existence at the time a site is listed for consideration. 'Within line of sight" means that it is possible to reasonably visually distinguish and recognize individuals. For the purposes of granting a conditional use permit for siting a secure community transition facility, the Town Council shall consider an unobstructed visual distance of 600 feet to be "within line of sight." Through the Conditional Use Permit process, "line of sight" may be considered to be less than 600 feet if the applicant can demonstrate that visual barriers exist or can be created that would reduce the line of sight to less than 600 feet. Cita .from 04,L, 3 Nei --(Kt. (,j4/1 WI/6 The department is planning to site one 12-bed facility in King County. The facility would be designed as two six-bed buildings on one site, with the construction of the second building to be completed when needed. Building and operating four three-bed facilities instead of one 12-bed facility would nearly double the capital costs and increase ongoing annual operating costs by 46 percent. These increases would be on top of an already expensive program. The operating costs of one three-bed facility—after the initial startup expenses in the first two years —would be an estimated $1.068 million per year. The 12-bed facility would be an estimated $2.936 million per year. It would cost an additional $1.336 million per year to house 12 residents in four facilities instead of one. In establishing state operating and capital budgets, the legislature must make decisions based on a prudent use of the state's resources. Restricting the size of the secure community transition facility to three beds, which would require siting four facilities on four sites, is clearly not a prudent use of resources. Such a restriction on the facility size by local jurisdictions would appear to be designed to be preclusive. It would greatly elevate the cost without any analysis and justification to show that the increased cost is essential to and enhances public safety. Determining the size of a SCTF is within the scope of the department's decision-making authority granted by the legislature. Using a reference to RCW 71.09.255(2)(c), which states that the minimum size facility is three beds, to justify the City's proposed size limitation is an incorrect application of the law. Please note that RCW 71.09.255 pertains to incentive grants to local jurisdictions for planning for the siting of SCTFs. A minimum size is not a maximum size. There is no reference in the law that gives local jurisdictions the authority to limit the size of the facility. The issue of equitable distribution of SCTFs is addressed in RCW 71.09.250(8). The following is a key statement in this section: In coordinating and deciding upon the siting of secure community transition facilities, great weight shall be given by the county and the cities within the county to...[the number and location of existing residential facility beds operated by the department of corrections or the mental health division of the department of social and health services and the number of registered sex offenders classified as level ll or level III and the number of sex offenders registered as homeless in each jurisdiction in the county]..." A plain reading of this section makes clear the legislature's intent for the county and cities within the county to work closely together and with the department to determine where facilities are most appropriately sited. It does not suggest that local jurisdictions have the right to determine the size of the facilities, but rather where the facilities would be most appropriately located to avoid an undue burden on a community that may already have a significant number of mental health and correctional residential facilities or registered sex offenders. In directing each county and the cities within the county to work together, the legislature recognized that the equitable distribution of SCTF requires coordination across jurisdictions. If each jurisdiction, looking only to its own jurisdiction, were to develop an "equitable distribution" policy that arbitrarily limits the size of the facility with the effect of significantly increasing the cost, the result would not be equitable distribution of facilities, City of Ri i Department of Planning/Building/Public I s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: bki5l� -✓„I U COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 8,2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-087,ECF \ DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 26,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition WORK ORDER NO: 77017 Facilities CITY Or aFNTnN LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of I-405 RECEIVED SITE AREA: I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A JUL L y 2002 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium ItikatialNaidDialedWeicial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defed in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Necessary Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS yl O(/l--< We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this oposal. 1 36 02 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public VvorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?\ v\ Vs,✓•,4 t_ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-087,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 26,2002 rITY(IF Ra ZQ J APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition WORK ORDER NO: 77017 JUL 3 0 2002 Facilities IJIJ LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of I-405 BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF) which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan. As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1) 330 ft.,2) 1000 ft.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Necessary Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCultural Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ki gl/t—( B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1j Ci t C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to prop rly assess this proposal. --7 2' t 1 All ' I s..JIJ?)1, S (till"! of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routi g Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pi v Q Pr RA), i-j t)A COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 8,2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-087,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 26,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca E ((�'V E U PROJECT TITLE: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition WORK ORDER NO: 77017 Facilities LOCATION: Em to ment Area Valle ,south of I-405 Jul 2 6 20Ce \D SITE AREA: I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A ur KENTON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community T ansition Fti ; tkok(SialrAvhich is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium I is Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defned in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Element of the Environment Probable Probable Afore Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Necessary Necessary Earth -Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /� 1ti C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation is needed •roperly assess this proposal. ay �� Si:,10; of Director or Author»s .ep . ntative Date Routi Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -p,V 1C..} COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-087,ECF DATE CIRCULATED' JULY 26,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition WORK ORDER NO: 77017 Facilities LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of I-405 SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities(SCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial,Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons,not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF,work release,prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defed in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft.,and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Minor Impacts Major Impacts Information Necessary Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio information is nee properly assess is p/oposal. 7( a� �az Sibtature 9t Director 4' uthoriz,. .epresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 T • .0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: July 26,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-087,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition Facilities PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed zoning text amendment would add Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF)which is facilities for sexually violent offenders to the zoning use table in the Heavy Industrial, Medium Industrial and Commercial Arterial zones in the Employment Area Valley south of Interstate 405. The use would be a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use subject to several special design criteria including evidence of a public process, consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan.As proposed the facilities could not house more than 3 persons, not be allowed within 330 feet of a residential use or within one mile of an existing SCTF, work release, prerelease or similar facility. The proposal includes an analysis of 3 options for buffering from"risk potential activities"as defined in RCW 71.09.020: 1)330 ft.,2) 1000 ft., and 3)within the line of sight as defined in the state statute. There is currently no proposal to locate such a facility in Renton. PROJECT LOCATION: Employment Area Valley,south of 1-405 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 26,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 26,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: N/A Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: City Council in August,date to be Determined CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: This project is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rebecca Lind,Principal Planner,EDNSP, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on August 8,2002. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rebecca Lind (425)430-6588 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-087,ECF/Title IV Code Amendment-Secure Transition Facilities NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION t- )1402- Og 7 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) I PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: PROJECT /OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ADDRESS: ilt/'v d, d ieett C I,C&4, . PROJECT/ADDRESS(S) �ATA AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: f`//r TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ;I/7APPLICANT (if other than owner) �1 � EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: l jCSC�!J' ✓( � ; V / PROPOSED LAND USE(S): C LCG� 7,110 d1,/ COMPANY(if applicable): i (3c7 ) 1'e/(/Q /6'/P46;(i-be -r �� 1/z�Opie&/G2S5 6ri 7 ^ LEXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: , k �/ PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: 7u(5� (if applicable): /04 TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING:itX PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feet):AN NAME: &iv&hn</ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED DEVELOPMENT O EtPLA N ING FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): COMPANY(if applicable): 4/4JUL 2 6 2002 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: RECEIVED ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable): CITY: ZIP: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: /1)4 masterap.doc Revised January 2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring pre ration of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help dpecjy •roposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask yoestp at*01. ;DINING answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be signi is tt adverse impact. JUL 2 6 2Cn2 USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: RECEIVED Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc07/25/02 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Title IV Amendments for Secure Community Transition Facilities 2. Name of applicant: City of Department of Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Rebecca Lind 425-430-6588 4. Date checklist prepared: July 24, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): None 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. City of Renton Environmental Determination for Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Zoning Text Amendment to allow Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF).This ordinance proposes allowing SCTF land uses in the Commercial Arterial, Medium Industrial and Heavy Industrial zones within the Employment Area Valley portion of the City south of 1-405. The use would require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use process and be subject to the following conditions: a. House no more than 3 persons, excluding resident staff. (Correction underlined) b. Not be allowed within 330 feet of any residential zone or residential use, located within or outside the City limits. c. Not be allowed adjacent to, abutting, across a parking lot from, or within the line of sight from a "risk potential activity" as defined in RCW 71.09.020, including but not limited to: • Community centers • Licensed day care operations • Licensed preschool facilities • Public libraries • Public park and recreation facilities • Religious facilities • Schools • School bus stops • Sports fields, and • Trails d. Be located within one mile from any existing SCTF, work release, prerelease, or similar facility. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 2 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Employment Area Valley south of 1-405 see Map Attachment 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. Surface Water:. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 3 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Water: Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe.. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. PLANTS Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 4 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 5. ANIMALS Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 5 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The land use allowed in the current zoning designations of Commercial Arterial, Industrial Medium and Industrial Heavy in a wide range of industrial, service and commercial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NA c. Describe any structures on the site. NA d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NA e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? NA f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? NA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NA Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NA j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NA k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NA 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Small facilities of no more that 3 beds would be allowed. Units are not residential uses but are classified as a public facility. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NA 10. AESTHETICS Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 6 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 11. LIGHT AND GLARE Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. RECREATION Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 7 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Introduction of this type of public facility would result in an increased need for police and social services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Social services would be provided by DSHS, the agency responsible for operation of the facilities. 16. UTILITIES Not Applicable Non- Project Action. SEPA Review of specific site application would be required at the time of siting a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /`itOnct Name Printed: C H.t-//2 Date: 1/21 \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 8 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None. Uses currently allowed in these zoning designations would allow comparable levels of discharges of these types. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Uses currently allowed in these zoning designations would allow comparable levels of impacts on plants, animals fish or marine line Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Uses currently allowed in these zoning designations would allow comparable levels of depletion of resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Uses currently allowed in these zoning designations would allow comparable impacts on sensitive area. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Location of a SCTF land use in one of these zones could have a potentially negative impact of adjacent uses and the re-development of industrial areas with for intensive commercial uses. However as current zoning allows a range of uses in these zones introduction of this new land use would not preclude the continuation of industrial activities or any use of adjacent areas. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 9 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This land use would increase demands on police service and demands on social services. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: DSHS would provide additional social services. The Renton Police Department would likely provide additional services to these facilities. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. State law ESSB 6594 requires adequate planning for siting of these facilities in local communities. Specific proposals for facilities will be reviewed under SEPA at the project level. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on m part. Proponent: W;(07Name Printed: t(4+t La kIL Date: I t& ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone 10 Amends\SCTF\environmental checklist.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION The enclosed draft ordinance sets forth the City's approach to compliance with 3ESSB 61. The City's Comprehensive Plan adequately addresses essential public facilities and allows for adoption of development standards establishing both review criteria and mapping for Secure Community Transition Facilities. As a result we are not proposing any further comprehensive plan amendments at this time,but are focusing on the development regulations. Land Use Policy LU-233 states "Guide and modify development of essential public facilities to meet Comprehensive Plan policies and to mitigate impacts and costs to the City." Land Use Policy LU-234 states "Use public processes and create criteria to identify public facilities. Public processes should include notification, hearings and citizen involvement. Criteria should be developed to review and assess proposals for public facilities". This ordinance proposes allowing SCTF land uses in the Commercial Arterial,Medium Industrial and Heavy Industrial zones within the Employment Area Valley portion of the City south of I-405. The use would require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use process and be subject to the following conditions: a. House no more than 3 persons,excluding resident staff. (Correction underlined) b. Not be allowed within 330 feet of any residential zone or residential use,located within or outside the City limits. c. Not be allowed adjacent to,abutting,across a parking lot from,or within the line of sight from a"risk potential activity"as defined in RCW 71.09.020,including but not limited to: • Community centers • Licensed day care operations • Licensed preschool facilities • Public libraries • Public park and recreation facilities • Religious facilities • Schools • School bus stops • Sports fields,and • Trails d. Be located within one mile from any existing SCTF,work release,prerelease,or similar facility. We have completed a preliminary GIS analysis of this proposed use in the Valley. Although Renton's draft ordinance states that these uses must be 330 feet from residential uses,this provision is anticipated to have little impact on the actual siting of the facilities as there are no residential uses in this area within Renton. The only residential use in the area that would trigger this requirement is located in Tukwila. Two alternative options for buffering are analyzed as a proxy for the site distance as defined in ESSB6594. 1)the 330 feet proposed in the ordinance draft and 2)a buffer of 1000 feet.Under the site distance definition the actual site distance would be calculated at the time a specific site was selected and might be either greater or less than the 330 feet. However,with a distance of 1000 feet, 130 acres would be available.With a distance of 330 feet,396 acres would be available.The breakdown by zone,after wetlands are excluded from the calculations,is shown on the table below. 330 ft. Buffer Zone Area (acres) Wetlands Total Developable CA 32.90 0.95 31.95 IL 149.12 19.75 129.37 IM 174.19 19.55 154.64 IH 91.08 10.19 80.89 Zone Area (acres) Wetlands Total Developable CA 8.19 0.54 7.65 IL 59.52 16.27 43.25 IM 65.54 0.10 65.44 IH 14.15 0.35 13.80 The attached map of the Employment Area Valley south of I-405 illustrates this distance from"risk potential activities"using both the 1000 foot and 330 foot standard. At this time we do not have knowledge of another work release,pre-release or similar facility located within one mile of this area,but believe that if one were established in either Kent or Tukwila,or at another location in Renton,that this standard would provide a reasonable spacing between facilities. The proposed conditional use process requires several decision criteria. In reviewing these we evaluated the state statute and believe that the seven items are consistent with the intent of the statute. The provisions provide for public process,consideration of alternative locations,operating rules and a security plan which are consistent with the state statute,and findings that there is equitable distribution of facilities and no impact on any one racial,cultural or socio-economic group. Our draft ordinance also proposed amending our current congregate residence,convalescent center,and group home definitions to exclude SCTF land uses from these categories. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, LAND USE DISTRICTS; CHAPTER 4, PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; CHAPTER 8, PERMITS AND DECISIONS; CHAPTER 9, PROCEDURES AND REVIEW CRITERIA; AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS; OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO PROVIDE A PROCESS AND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-2-060.G of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION II. Section 4-2-070.L of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit B. SECTION III. Section 4-2-070.Q of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit C. SECTION IV. Section 4-2-070.R of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit D. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING JUL 2 6 7-1 CITY OF RENTON JUL 2 6 2002 RECEIVED ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI. Section 4-4-080.F.10.e of Chapter 4, Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit E. SECTION VII. Section 4-8-120.0 of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit F. SECTION VIII. Sections 4-8-120.D.15 and 19 of Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended by adding the following definitions, to read as follows: Operating Rules Proposal for Secure Community Treatment Facility (SCTF): A written proposal outlining the scope of operations of a secure community transition facility, including but not limited to daily operating hours, activities of occupants, procedures for off-site activities, in any, and visitation procedures for non-residents, including professional care providers, family members, or other service providers. Siting process report for Use permits for Secure Community Treatment Facility (SCTF): A narrative report describing in detail the process used to evaluate alternative sites for the proposed SCTF activity and the basis for the recommendation to locate the facility at the recommended site. A minimum of three alternative sites shall be addressed. SECTION IX. Section 4-9-030 of Chapter 9, Procedures and Review Criteria, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 3 ORDINANCE NO. Convalescent Centers: Facilities for patients who are recovering health and strength after illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or terminal illness where care includes ongoing medical treatment, including hospice, and extended care facilities. This definition foes not include retirement residences, adult family homes, group homes I and II, medical institutions, or secure community transition facilities. SECTION XI. Section 4-11-070 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by changing the following definitions, to read as follows: Group Home I (Rehabilitation): A facility or dwelling unit housing persons, unrelated by blood or marriage and operating as a group facility household. A rehabilitative group home may include halfway houses and substance abuse recovery homes. This definition does not include congregate residential and secure community transition facilities. Group Home II (Protective Residency): A facility or dwelling unit housing persons, including resident staff, unrelated by blood or marriage and operating as a group family household. Staff persons provide care, education, and participation in community activities for the residents with the primary goal of enabling the resident to live as independently as possible. A protective residency may include disabled (mentally and physically) persons, foster child care, abused women shelter, orphanages and other uses where residents are deemed vulnerable and/or disabled and are not a threat to self or to public health or safety. This definition does not include congregate residential or secure community transition facilities. SECTION XII. Section 9-11-190, Definitions "S," of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 5 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1000:7/8/02:ma 7 EXHIBIT B 4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) USES: TYPE: City government offices AD AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL City government facilities H RESOURCES Other government offices and H Natural resource extraction/recovery H facilities Secure transition community facilities H71 ANIMALS & RELATED USES Kennels, hobby AC#37 OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Pets, common household, up to 3 per AC Conference Center _ P#38 dwelling unit or business Medical and dental offices P establishment Offices, general _ P Veterinary offices/clinics P RESIDENTIAL Attached dwelling P#18 RETAIL Adult retail use P#43 OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND Big-box retail P HOME OCCUPATIONS Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Group homes I H Eating and drinking establishments P Group homes II for 7 or more H Horticultural nurseries H Home occupations AC #6 Retail sales P Retail sales, outdoor P SCHOOLS Taverns P K-12 educational institution(public or H#9 Vehicle sales, large P#41 private) Vehicle sales, small P K-12 educational institution(public or P#9 private), existing ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Other higher education institution P Entertainment Schools/studios, arts and crafts P Adult entertainment business P#43 Trade or vocational school H Cultural facilities AD Dance clubs P PARKS Dance halls P Parks,neighborhood P Card room P#52 Parks,regional/community, existing P Gaming/gambling facilities, not-for- H Parks, regional/community,new AD profit Movie theaters P OTHER COMMUNITY& PUBLIC Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition P FACILITIES halls, indoor Community Facilities Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition AD Cemetery H halls, outdoor Religious institutions H Recreation Service and social organizations H Recreation facilities, indoor P Public Facilities Recreational facilities,outdoor H TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C,Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts,and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements. EXHIBIT D 4-2-070R INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH) USES: TYPE: OFFICE AND CONFERENCE AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL Conference Center P#38 RESOURCES Medical and dental offices P#38 Natural resource extraction/recovery H Offices, general P#13 Veterinary offices/clinics P#38 ANIMALS & RELATED USES Kennels P#37 RETAIL Kennels, hobby AC#37 Adult retail use P#43 Pets, common household,up to 3 per AC Big-box retail P dwelling unit or business Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC establishment Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND HOME Retail sales P#34 OCCUPATIONS Retail sales,outdoor P#30 Caretaker's residence AC Vehicle sales, large P Vehicle sales, small P SCHOOLS K-12 educational institution(public or H ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION private) Entertainment K-12 educational institution(public or P#9 Adult entertainment business P#43 private), existing Cultural facilities AD Other higher education institution P#38 Dance clubs P#38 Schools/studios,arts and crafts P#38 Dance halls P#38 Trade or vocational school H Card room P#52 Gaming/gambling facilities, not-for- H#38 PARKS profit Parks,neighborhood P Movie theaters P#38 Parks,regional/community, existing P Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition P#38 Parks,regional/community, new AD halls, indoor Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition P#38 OTHER COMMUNITY& PUBLIC FACILITIES halls,outdoor Community Facilities Recreation Cemetery _ H Recreation facilities, indoor P#38 Religious institutions H Recreational facilities, outdoor P#32 Service and social organizations H Public Facilities SERVICES City government offices AD Services, General City government facilities H Hotel P#38 Other government offices and H Motel P#38 facilities Off-site services P#38 Secure transition community facilities H71 On-site services P#38 Drive-in/drive-through service AC#62 TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C,Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts,and RMC 4-3-090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements. Submission Table Exhibit FI TABLE 4-8-120C Part 1 LAND USE 0 .. APPLICATIONS Q c12 O 0 o o .0 . 2 . y n. ¢ o N y E 74 b0 7t to 2 - C O U Z a �" 0 ¢ o • o •E Off, a - > o n y a o aka.. c a F. F ¢ C ¢ t X X '� 7 - °� . . a c ❑ s ti C C L c c a a w o 2 a 2 0 g 0 ° 70 ° :° 7a w 0 v w u0 0 a p F' .� y ' a. E a 2 0 0 0 0 •N o on c .a :� a¢i c c a SUBMITTAL g4. w c e a o f E a d c ctl E a 8 2 2 .o u c c :a �3 REQUIREMENTS Fa ¢ 4 ¢ ¢ mo U ¢ U Uw U 2 ( ¢ 3= w wa x .3 10%Notice of Intent to 13 Annex 60%Petition to Annex 13 Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign Applicant Agreement 5 5 5 Statement(for wireless communication facilities) Applicant's Confirmation of Condition Compliance Application Fee per RMC 4- x x x x x x x x x x x 1-170 Assessment Information 1 1 Authorization for Abatement Binding Site Plan Map Business License Application 1 for Home Occupation Calculations,Survey 3 Colored Display Maps 1 1 1 1 1 Construction Mitigation 5 5 5 5 5 5 Description Draft Deed for Any Proposed 4 4 Dedication of Land for Public Purposes Draft Homeowner's 4 4 4 4 Association Documents,if applicable LAND USE , APPLICATIONS ,- a Y 0 zp aoi o E v 2 o ua. d o on ro ao 1 °' °' € ,D O U z a ,- a Q o .E o .E t aJ :. > > o aai o a a a w y a o o a al aa) a o a o ti °' 'E °' N v a .. _ w Q Q•a '� 3 = a a o a a a= u, o 0 .a o cCo aCi ° ° W v aai _o _V Q P. :: F" v, ' a. E a. O a O a O O 6 C C caa "'� .-1 C V] V] .� K x „ a s •P.c a . Z Z .Y 'E .— 'C a 2 6 o U a; e; > v o f v o ❑ a a SUBMITTAL a x o U c a o E E a ° a s a c > > c a N d o REQUIREMENTS a = ¢ ¢ cn o (3 ¢a 8 ° 8 ° ¢ w w ri c7 x Justification for Rezone Justification for Variance Request King County Assessor's Map 3 Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, 5 5 5 12 Conceptual r Lease Agreement,Draft(for 5 5 5 wireless communication facilities) Legal Description 13 13 12 12 5 5 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 Letter Describing Proposed 1 Home Occupation Letter from Property Owner Letter to Examiner/Council I Stating Reason(s)for Appeal per RMC 4-8-1 10C3 Letter Explaining Which 12 Comprehen sive Plan Text/Policies Should Be Changed and Why List of Affected Property 2 2 Owners within Annexation Area Boundary List of Surrounding Property 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Owners Lot Line Adjustment Map 5 Mailing Labels for Property 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Owners Map of Existing Site 12 Conditions Map of View Area(for 5 5 5 ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 LAND USE _ �, APPLICATIONS ° `0 c •a z °' pC0 Q V O p 'L7 7) �L r�ii C cv] ice. F- S a n a s 3 3 0 > 0 U z a .° o d o C5 o .5 .> E 0 a. p N 0. o C A y Aa. C� a y ^y ti CG CG ,.. N ti c ❑zi. ti ¢. o o -� o cCa aCi c°a ° ° H w v b c�i € : c 0 H 7 y '� a E a o °o 0 0 0 o an a a d c r c 7 E ci o :o :o is :o F V b c c .a 3 SUBMITTAL aW ❑ a a REQUIREMENTS a d 1 ¢ C. m' ¢ .- w ? x aU U . U U o w w r.7 at 2 5 Form Screening Detail, 12 12 12 12 12 12 Refuse/Recycling Security Plan for Use Permits 12 for SCTF Service Area Map(for 5 5 wireless communication facilities only) Short Plat Plan Short Plat Plan,Final Site Plan,Land Use Review 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 2 Site Plan,Shoreline Permit Siting Process Report for Use 12 Permits for SCTF Statement Addressing Basis for Alter nate and/or Modification Statement Addressing the Basis for the Shoreline Permit Exemption Request Statement Addressing the PUD's Relationship to the City Comprehen sive Plan Survey Title Report or Plat 3 Certificate Topography Map(5 contours) 5 5 Traffic Study 5 5 5 52 52 Tree Cutting/Vegetation 4 4 4 4 4 4 Clearing Plan Tree Cutting/Vegetation Plan, 4 Approved ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 5 Table 4-8-120C Legend: 1.This information is required only for those home occupations that will have customer visits,more than six(6)busi ness deliveries per week,or external indication of commercial activity. 2.Level of detail limited to scope listed in RMC 4-9-210A. 3.Level of detail required may be reduced by Administrator. 4.For conditional use permit applications for wireless communication facilities,the applicant shall submit a prelimi nary sketch(five(5) copies)for preliminary staff review prior to submittal of the conditional use permit application.The staff shall review this map within fourteen(14)working days and inform applicant of any preliminary concerns and recommendations for revisions at a scheduled preapplication meeting.The staff shall also indicate where photo simulations will be required for the application submittal,and may choose to waive submittal requirements for the conditional use permit when deemed appropriate.This shall not preclude the staff from making further recommenda tions at the application stage. 5.Only required for projects requiring a public hearing. 6.Only required for residential projects requesting modification to special development standards in a Centers Residential Demonstration District RMC 4-3-120B3,or for any development subject to special development standards requiring upper story setbacks in the Center Office Residential 3(COR 3)Zone,RMC 4-2-120B. 7.Not required for Land Use Review Site Plan Level II. 8.Land Use Review Site Plan,Level I and/or Level II,as appropriate. 9.Only required for projects requiring review in the Urban Center Design Overlay District. (Ord.4587,3-18-1996;Amd.Ord.4722,5-11-1998;Ord.4777,4-19-1999;Ord.4802,10-25-1999;Ord.4821, 1-24-2000) Number of required copies(if any)is indicated in each column unless waived by the Development Services Division. . �. �......,Tr.� �. -.-,._...r... ...�.._...-.............-._...,..... w5r. wt.c. .a.3ue w.:nnuu a...�ccmxit •--. ,. ... r..: ew.eraa f Judith Wright - Secure Community Transition ' cilities Page From: Rebecca Lind To: iken@cted.wa.gov Date: 7/19/02 5:22PM Subject: Secure Community Transition Facilities July 19, 2002 Ike Nwankwo Growth Management Program Office of Community Development P.O. Box 48350 Olympia, WA 98504-8350 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE ENACTING REGULATIONS FOR SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES Dear Mr. Nwankwo: The enclosed draft ordinance is currently before the Renton Planning Commission and City Council for review. This draft sets forth the City's approach to compliance with 3ESSB 6151. Please accept the following amendments for 60-day review. We have made the determination that the City's Comprehensive Plan adequately addresses essential public facilities and allows for adoption of development standards establishing both review criteria and mapping for Secure Community Transition Facilities. As a result we are not proposing any further comprehensive plan amendments at this time, but are focusing on the development regulations. Land Use Policy LU-233 states "Guide and modify development of essential public facilities to meet Comprehensive Plan policies and to mitigate impacts and costs to the City." Land Use Policy LU-234 states "Use public processes and create criteria to identify public facilities. Public processes should include notification, hearings and citizen involvement. Criteria should be developed to review and assess proposals for public facilities". Our ordinance proposes to allow SCTF land uses in the Commercial Arterial, Medium Industrial and Heavy Industrial zones within the Employment Area Valley portion of the City south of 1-405. The use would require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use process and be subject to the following conditions: a. House more than 3 persons, excluding resident staff. b. Not be allowed within 330 feet of any residential zone or residential use, located within or outside the City limits. c. Not be allowed adjacent to, abutting, across a parking lot from, or within the line of sight from a"risk potential activity" as defined in RCW 71.09.020, including but not limited to: • Community centers • Licensed day care operations • Licensed preschool facilities • Public libraries • Public park and recreation facilities • Religious facilities • Schools • School bus stops • Sports fields, and Trails d. Be located within one mile from any existing SCTF, work release, prerelease, or similar facility. We have completed a preliminary GIS analysis of this proposed use in the Valley. Although Renton's draft ordinance states that these uses must be 330 feet from residential uses, this provision is anticipated to have little impact on the actual siting of the facilities as there are no residential uses in this area within Renton. The only residential use in the area that would trigger this requirement is located in Tukwila. We evaluated a buffer area of both 330 feet and 1000 feet as a proxy for the site distance criteria in the state regulations. We realize that the actual site distance would be calculated at the time a specific site was selected and might be either greater or less than the 330 feet. However, with a distance of 1000 feet, 130 acres would be available. With a distance of 330 feet, 396 acres would be available. The breakdown by Judith Wright Reminder Map Amendments Page 1 From: Rebecca Lind To: Cerise, Gil; Del Rosario, Gary; Erickson, Donald; Higgins, Elizabeth; Wright, Judith Date: 7/22/02 3:09PM Subject: Reminder Map Amendments The first briefing on map amendments is August 7 Packet materials go out by Friday August 2. Your issue paper and recommendation is due at the end of this week so that Alex has plenty fo time to review and comment. Don and Gil are scheduled to begin with Springbrook and Rural Residential (Gil) and Talbot Rd. the COR to RC technical correction, and Merlino(Don). Because we are going to need part of the agenda on August 7th to complete work on the Housing Element I am moving the Talbot Map Amendment (Don) to the 21st. That gives a little more time to get that one completed. don please put the PC meeting on your schedule for that date as well (sorry) For the second briefing on map amendments on August 21st(Elizabeth has Aegis technical correction, KC Department of Heath site and the R-8/R-5 decision for the East Renton PAA. Issue papers are due by August 9th. If you need any mapping done for your item please coordinate with Gary. For each amendment I would like an aerial, a map showing area comp plan and zoning and the parcel marked with existing and proposed comp plan/zoning, and a map of sensitive areas. Please include the Comp Plan amendment number in the title block. For Elizabeth's R/8-R-5 discussion and Gils rural Resdiential the mapping needs are a bit different so lets discuss those. A sample format for the issue paper is attached. I sent the format in an earlier e-mail just a note-the category"best available science" isn't needed except for text amendments involving critical areas. CC: Pietsch, Alexander , ._, ...„ . . . \ ' ' \ . it - , • \•�•,♦+@��v ti, ✓cis,$4,:•, .'l� °v'Y•a.O �• •,,, ;.„ ;LJ:JI • - '.!` _.J"+1 i n"' a a�4 y. y0,? 1g744k.`,..".. .i. 1 . ti Q I1, \,4 , - \g�; '�pa'Z,O ��,,° ati�♦ •"a�6 °@,a0@�°♦a ai�`O�y � :.. \ 1' :_.. - i a'�4°Od• f60N,�v ''4<♦C Ng °°. a^s 0•"♦°14 \ ! _,_ - ,‘,1*. ..:,,s „4-4:4;1.4-1,..,:i '''''-'.. -'s `°r 0� � >rv +,': a v — —= // O 410 N wRa' a.;:": 41;.::,..1%. .‘.. I fr Yv` r s 0. I Hir-- # :: ♦:...s,K,..,,<;,,,it ,,,,.,...„7.,,,::::n , + ,..,,,,,„ . ., .,„ .., a I o °°,� neat l t a o I 1 Pa. 4 Asa � °' , j _ i 1 . `S .. ao s *,yj I I� 111- 1 I ,_ ., a1 ;, s 1 _ AM a� w v �♦• �a r>gOyT f `.' ` ! O4D`y' <�t,„,t.„:.t...-...„.,.. - �y p!i °� . . sa`fie � � xp?� ap� ' ~_& C uu ' . .' x '/j , � a�4 �i�� � : , a�' � S I ` , ` +' zeas--)1 11 -if0a0e @4Oa °Q _ aasaa e� y 4ys® --- %" °4 07✓ \ 0�4 . .4,4 !CO °ae•° i 4 > ♦ ,/ ar° .. a a awns � O � @. / S � 5° a °° A •aaJC° a , ° ,t �_iij 1* ..-,-,...4„,,,,.„, ,4.,,,,,,, . : ( ' i i0°.,,,.,�4 �°arm- •,QIA;t`,\: , „ •1 .e.t. sott t• . li e, 1 11, ,,, ,, ,:yx::00:4440.0.,.., . i LI aa, 6' ° , Renton SCTF 0 1500 3000 1000 ft buffer @1YIr�l CA-Commercial Arterial 1 : 18000 I I IL-Industrial Light ■ I I IM-Industrial Medium G.;i s,;s.i IH-Industrial Heavy I I DSHS identified at-risk parcel Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning Wetlands P 1000 ft.buffer from DSHS identified at-risk parcels ®. Sue Carlson. Administrator —G. Del Rosario _ City Limits Identified trail 12 July 2002 Proposed Strander Extension I I 1000 ft.buffer from identified trails 'Area excludes wetlands and is shown in acres