Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA99-119 „ p CITY OF RENTON o y-? _ , fr .u. Planning/Building/Public Works "� �r i� 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 W SFP 14'9 9 0_ • Q O 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Q..' 4260 U.S. FPOSTAGE itle 0`9 15 99 FCM PRESORTED SEA WA 981 ^, T AT -1141 ,N,� HARRISON JULIA L V 1400 HUBBELL PL #607 AVVIX ( 5 SEATTLE WA 98101 l/ IRO D..!..; .i.ti!,i.;L`.. _. Fi b/ ,---- ! AS A riCi r.i) ,.*' . d cf) j RETu 1 TO SEA:;:`.i a 'a C> '1/ �.' 32 1{{ 1 i 1 i i1 4i1l14tRliiltliltllliilli!!!ii'!'llliiiliilEill 1 1111tittiti m ilililiini til m t / %4 p CITY OF RENTON ��o S o�y. , �..I ..�..:,� • ••� Planning/Building/Public Works F�'� ! F"OF 4 . dil �� "? tF� l 0Mti� — i 1055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98055 W .q ./rami.9 IA 0 3 D 5 * DR__ ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED RXCHRo5* 980553001 1898 i5 09/1.7/99 RICH ARDS ' TERRI FORM 3547 545 READING AVE WEST READING PA 19611-i01i I,,,III,I,,,il ll,,,II,,,lill Il,,,!!,!„l,I,l,ll,,,! RICHARDS TERRI 2205 BLgINE CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 AUT0 'YOtv'sV z c: © CITY OF RENTON Q ._____ "- ••LL Planning/Building/Public Works 1CC '�r 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 CA Lanai)P 1 a j_1m__ « o ?,o S2PB IADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED72042601 U.S. POSTAGE tr.: MCCART STEVEN R+SUSAN G 1602 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA MCCA602 980553001 1898 15 09/17/99 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND MCCART 24036 111T1-i PL SE APT G2O1 KENT WA 98031-5274 RETURN TO SENDER AUTO WON%'5:27-s2- ;i;iuwas,Elzifu,,{i,lllididllml ndiiiiniffiJIi,iAlsiluEl c, 0 CITY OF RENTON A , _ • .a Planning/Building/Public Works s �., N SEP 14'8 9 OM U . U 4 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 1 _ Q2 PB L., . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED ¢ 720426o a P08TAGE VANDERSTUYFT JOHAN 1808 ABERDEEN AVE 59E 8055 RENTON WA VAND808 980553001 1A98 15 09/1 7/99 RETURN TO SENDER VANDERSTUYFT MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD C` RETURN TO `SENDER f ! { + j { ! {! R U T o 3�J 7gl ��J' 11k1i11!d1,11„!lite?li ![1{��11111t1i'fft1lltllt1fi1il�fllli1.1.1 iiflllf41 p CITY OF R_ENTON ••+i Planning/Building/Public Works .0. 1055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98055 W ' . : 0 3 0 S • ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a.''i 72042� Y.t:90 AGE 09 15 99 F+_t•1. PRESORTED SEc:t 1=3c ' f=1 FISHER GINGER L I4 RENTON_ISSAQ RENTON wA VAH RD NT 98055 _ d�5 SE ��.,.•�:!,_.":`� ` . tea V\R." - .� li!{34iii�4 fflil4 4 1 ii! E!!it 3f !Fl 3ti ii{i itEl i{ j cy © CITY OF RENTON ---w • .ri Planning/Building/Public Works "' dte T055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 • ti SEP l 4'9 9 =0 .30 5 i . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a - 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE w PARMACEK BRETT A 10212 NE 68TH ST B-202 KIRKLAND WA 98033 • !RETURN c66 TO W:"l RI TEF} dis 9r ADDRESSEE ��_ IN a ,� UNKNOWN a4(4l�d� • fdr. }2i4 II,I„1„I,II,,,,1,I„1,1,,,Il,,,I,l,,,ll,l„111,,,,1,1,1„131 CITY OF RENTON1---12 � - ..a Planning/Building/Public Works w 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 h (E :Ej,:) 1 _ mMi .ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED �'. 7 4426® u.s.aosTaaE r - BRIERLEY JOHN+KRISTINE Y 1814 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA E3 - IE814 980553001 1898 15 09/17/99 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND BRIERLEY 805 SW MAYER ST WINLOCK WA 98596-9425 . WEST EAST EXISTING RESERVOIR 510 ' 505 PROPOSED.RESERVOIR... 500 - 490 ._.... 485 _ PROICRTY tilt 4804 ... .. . ...... PROPOSED BOOSTER .. .......... 475 _ �PUNR STATION 470 ` aeo4144* i 455 - ��. , �- — sE 116 AV 450 - 445 440 ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH 0 ,•=20' NORTH SOUTH 510 — 505 PROPOSE➢..RESERVOIR .. . ea $Oo 495 490 .. 485 480 PROPERTY LINE 475 PROPOSED BOOSTER = PUMP STADON • 11.11 460 cFNT De vE _.._.__ 455 PU \ /i—'i ti 450 : r_ 445 - 440 .._ ._. ELEVATION LOOKING EAST o RN9[ROIR[[RINq INC. �J4) htip://wv.,h2com . . ... Vim malboxWh2ean I..20' 1.E00.720.E052 •4 t II l 4 i.4 i RLONOID OFFICE LZ..1•Wl:l�l:1E'T♦ ♦25889.1488 _ - •4•414:1111M21.1111 W[NATCNE[OFFICE 500.861.0150 .. DRAMNG IS NOT TO SCALE ,.•• ••• .....•• IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG 0 ' 1" 2" CITY OF RENTON ROLLING HILLS RESER e.i :^% i' NATION ISIItreitC)\SS-SECTIONS I.NO. FlI MON Intro GE SCAZ PLOT 194.062.021 RHBR-0131 SCH 1 TAP I JAN 23.1908 1 SHOMN 120 I CO4 1 120r47 K ► O _ FLUSH WALL •-1--5'-6"--et—5 0 ' 11'-10'—. -.-1, i OETAIL ON DWG N0. 504 : P1T260 7-,-.1.1:-,,,*it,-„,'"' � �_ t 4T'.�'� • _TTrr_•' ' 7,.°I �,. rr!! �. 0 �~ T"z �r r�.2 " i.., , Sys. .. `.,'*.FORREINFOENT �� iZ . I Y. !�Rr�r,+w' _ Y,,.. �;;6 6' PAPADETAILS,6'HEIGHT , T�vY '�=r ..4T�" : I.'^ a,.. `"Ta+'••.1.L' ryir"i�'.th'�°r^/. ' O �` Y+.,7,H_TH.q �S• y~.} ' - "dT' �', `' t .T.,.:•l.Tu Z'� �'^ Y'�1 rry -,'3'-1tQ' TMI'.".;`YT,'"vy:i 'r a'"�, �'' �, T HOUSEKEEPING PAD, I --.. 1 SEE DWG N0.SO4 FOR r DETAILS,4'HEIGHT I / 1 / 12'-2 0 ' i IL L PUMP PAD,SEE DING NO.501 r 4'-0" 4'-0" 3'-0• 3'-0° ��FOR DETAILS,1'YP.OF 4 f V % / I WALL OBLIQUE-VIEW 1- L �� FROM SOUTH r / , ii. R 17 11 ? NOT TO SCALE,APPROX 1'=8-0' I- 1 6'-0;' I ��0* 14'-0" �.l ,re :'..rj:,' �\ kti G i' 13'-2" ** �r '/ ' irk e ,fl t, Wig 0 Nig .-_, ."..:.., ..,,,...,t,„kszt,,,,,,, .1,..,. e-,,...?....,,,, if, ....1.... . ..4.. . s ~ °Qi`x 2.r A 1%///!///I/�/r///!////////',' ....._...,_ _„i"AM '//i%///////////////�i'///TINN////(//%////////////////////////�i� ///�/{/Al."" /////�Ivvin, <i' ., _._ -a: 'i"fi .t7 �' `+'+ `M „r":. 11._9. NOIII 4'-a. �'w. S ter`-4;:‘, +^64� y, 7 ,y t � • T r rw " ° I, L3 '�r-10'G- ® /\ .`7za 'w�� a � �� T + .. 's �s�� r` �..rTrS 2-7 EQUIPMENT PAD,SEE DWG r / \ J � r -4 Y x+ +ti ,65,-;.,�I • , --$,,, 's i ^r w, 'I ,� .*:'r"'"` N0.SO4 FOR DETAILS SERE DWG N0.503 FOR "� "� 'E'�9 '7• •�w �,7 ,•3�°P � Sr �,�y «ws' ® �Till ° ® :_ T,Z ^r '' err / LOCATIONS of noon AND \� ^�Y �, ""• xfi'' 1 _, ®3'-I5° © I / VENTILATION PENETRATIONS. / •.. y "Tr.,"":,''' " ///P/%%//%(%/A.4%%....d/.G,l%/.. %�/G,.....r ;,::VMPINV/I( c ° I - i 4'-0° ��s�® o'-D• ,6'-B' WALL OBLIQUE-VIEW FROM NORTH NOT TO SCALE,APPROX 1"=8'-0' I 11.-9" / 1/ \ Q0 _ `�1'. oNt j DOOR SCHEDULE HARDWARE CODES St'‘� 40 —, GLULAM BEAM.SEE DWG NO. HARDWARE OTT SIZE FRAME PANEL LETTERING ON DOOR 8- WEATHHOLDTRIP(ALL SIDES) �' © / NO.SO5 FOR DETAILS 1 ABDEFH 1 6'O'X 7'0" STEEL STEEL ENGINE/GENERATOR ROOM C- LEVER LATCH W/LOCK ,,',,' -'' F. lerill 2 ABDEFH 1 6'0'X 7'0' STEEL STEEL PUMP ROOM D- DEAD BOLT&FLUSH EXTENSIONBOLTS&ASTRAGAL - 4 - / 3 ABDEFH 1 6'0"X TO' STEEL STEEL PUMP ROOM E- DOOR STOP/HOOK(WALL MOUNT) _._ _—. _ "= F- INTERIOR PANIC BAR OPENER -- - —" CMU IYVIRAN Q 4 ABCEF 1 3'0"X T0' STEEL STEEL WATER OUALItt ROOM G- DOOR STOP(WALL MOUNT) 29-9 -I �� 5 GI 1 SO"X 7'0' STEEL STEEL RESTROOM H- PUSH/PULL HARDWARE Q _ _- t-V, 1- PASSAGE LATCH ItY 6 ABCEF 1 3'0'X 7'0• STEEL STEEL SATELLITE CONTROL ROOM J- DOOR CLOSER WALL PLAN LOUVER AND DAMPER SCHEDULE NO. COMPONENT OTY MANUFACTURER MODEL ACCESSORIES L1 AUTOMATIC SHUTTER 1 ACME ENGINEERING WH1818 NONE L2 COMBINATION LOUVER 1 LOUVERS&DAMPERS,INC. SAL-42 ACTUATOR: BARBARA COLEMAN(MA 418) L3 LOUVER AND DAMPER 1 LOUVERS&DAMPERS,INC. TF-21,VCD-P ACTUATOR: BARBARA COLEMAN(MA 418) FINISH SCHEDULE L4 LOUVER AND DAMPER I LOUVERS&DAMPERS,INC. EL-42,GEC-42 ACTUATOR: BARBARA COLEMAN(MA 418) ALL EXTERIOR L5 LOUVER SHUTTER 1 KANALFLAKT,INC. VK 40 NONE '-"-----,'"'- -:�="' RHO LN6INLLRINQ,INC. ROOM FLOOR CEILING N.E. WALL N.W. WALL S.W.WALL S.E.WALL WALLS - 6ttp://w..m2cm L6 LOUVER AND DAMPER 1 LOUVERS&DAMPERS,INC. 1F-21,VCD-P NONE '"0b01O1t12.908 X8882 PUMP ROOM TEXTURED COATED COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU UNCOATED 1114 1.800JZ0.8052 FLOOPiNG SHEETROCK CMU L7 ADJUSTABLE DRAINABLE LOUVER 1 LOVERS&DAMPERS,INC. AIEL-47 ACTUATOR: BARBARA COLEMAN(MA 418) ENGINEERS Rt0110NO GYM! PIPE GALLERY TEXTURED - COATED COATED COATED COATED COATED L8 GRAVITY VENTILATOR HOOD 1 LOUVERS&DAMPERS,INC. AGV-100 L&D,INC.ROOF CURB(MODEL A-MB) P I_A N P4 E R S 4zSe69.1488 FLOORNG CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE S C I E N T I S T S WQMATCHU OF ENGINE/GENERATOR TEXTURED COATED UNCOATED III/ 509685. 50 ROOM FLOORING SHEETROCK COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU CMU gg WATER QUALITY TEXTURED COATED COATED VENTILATOR SCHEDULE DRAWNG -IF BARNOT 2 LONG 0 T„ UN IS 2" ROOM FLOWING SHEEIROCK COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU CMU TEXTURED COATED UNCOATED NO. VENTILATOR OTY FLOW FLOVRATE HP BACKDRAFT DAMPER MANUFACTURER MODEL ACCESSORES CITY OF RENTON RESTROOM FLOOPoNG SHEETItOCN COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU CMU VI PUMP ROOM 1 EXHAUST 1,430 cfm 0.17 NO ACNE ENGINEERING FN14D4 BACK GUARD T r�T('�HILLS RESE e� SATELLITE TEXTURED COATED UNCOATED V2 SATELLITE CONTROL ROOM 1 EXHAUST 150 cim 0.05 NO KANALFLAKT,INC. KW 6XL INLET GUARD(NO.IG 6) ROI.J.dl\"' iIGJJaR` • �, TATION CONTROL ROOM FLOORING SHEETROCK CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU COATED CMU C ```` `� V3 WATER QUALITY ROOM 1 EXHAUST 750 dm 0.17 NO ACME ENGINEERING F012RD4 BACK GUARD(MOTOR SIDE) QO ATION WALL PLAN V4 ENGINE/GENERATOR ROOM 1 EXHAUST 12,000 c!m 2.00 NO ACME ENGINEERING HA42L FAN GUARD v V5 RESTROOM 1 EXHAUST 50 cim 0.07 YES GROAN 670 FLEXIBLE ROOF DUCTING KIT(NO.443) Awn Ill DO ! CCC at ALOE nm ma NO. 9EF1 194.062 I RHBR-DI7 LTVP I DRE I JAN 22,1998 I SHOWN 148 I SO2 I 14 0147 • _ -- +Iww�'- OVER FRAME MTH 2"x6"s AT 2'O.C.,TYP. M •1 ABOVE SHEATHING OF ROOF BELOW. t — 12-10' . �•'-.8_O•-r'� 5'-6' 5•_0• f 14'-C�• 41 2 12 '_-- •I 14 . r 1 I I I B-0. 18.10' I 1 11 I 1 1 1 7 I I I 1 11 I I L I I 1 1 1 I 1 1J( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1" I I 1 I I I I i l I ) 1 1 1 „'-,�1 / 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 4 I 1 ( ) 1 I I 1 1 F I I 1 I I 1 1 I T '-Dr 2'x4'CEILING JOISTS AT 2'O.C., 1 r I 1 1 i r" I I I I I I I I I I I I J 1 1 1- I I t r1 1 � , ' -. / /-TYP. PROVIDE DOUBLE JOISTS A7 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 " r T I I ( ) 1 1 i 1 I i 1 .1-1-1 �T 1 7 1 I T I 1 r I I \_ // EDGES OF SKYLIGHT OPENINGS. 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1((I r I 1 1( 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I�( 1 IIII -1 1 1 Ili I)�I I I I I -------_ - I -'� � I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I E I T r 1 I d I 1 I I I I I r 1 1 I 1 I I 1 4 1 I I 1 1 r II 3' B — f - ! _ - I( I I I [ I I I I I i l L l t l ( ) I I I I 1 1 1 1 J l I l C 1 1 r l 11 1 Ipn'II' JT I 1 11111I 1;I I II I II I I I II-111 71 r]t11 1 1 1 I I I I IJ I 1 1 1 1 T 11 r IIII II IFflI r .—. 15'-11 • — 3' 5'-8•x ROOF ELEVATION o I4 1 0 ' 1 ...<7.)..j I I 2•x6•END JACKS AT 2'DC., TYP. SKYLIGHT NOTES PROVIDE DOUBLE JACKS AT EDGES �) 1 } OF SKYLGHT OPENINGS. ' PROVIDE MINIMUM 1-1/2'WIDE WOOD CURBING FOR SKYLIGHT WHICH EXTENDS 4"ABOVE TOP FACE OF ADJACENT ROOF 4 12 �q Mil SHEATHING. CORDING MUST MEET RECOMMENDATIONS OF � - SKYUGHT MANUFACTURER AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1 _ _ , DOUBLE 2"z6"HIP RAFTERS. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. FLASH IN ACCORDANCE IMTH S' , 1 1 I'1'1'1'1`IT I 1 I 1 I I 1'r� I I 1 „r MUST BE DOUG-FIR-LARCH RECOMMENDATIONS OF METAL ROOF MANUFACTURER. 'I.-1 I I 111 I I r I I 1 t r I I I I I _11 1 a --- J 1 1 /� / I I I I I 1 1 1 11117 I11 I I 1111Ili'r r1i'1'I / SELECT STRUCTURAL OR BETTER. R_A ./,G -1 I I I —\// �� 11 1 r I 11 I r 1111 3-IN I 1110111 • = l 1 I 1 1 1 II1 I 1I,: 1 CLEAR �� OPENIN m�mmm 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II: I 1 :I, L 1 t �� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I- 1 1 1 �� 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 4 if 1 1 1 2'x4'LADDER FRAMING AT 2'O.C.,TYP.BETWEEN TOP TRUSS =f 1•�� a 1 I t I I 1 1. I 1 I 4 II -m'-� CHORDS AT ROOF AND BETWEEN BOTTOM TRUSS CHORDS AT �� memmmmmo i I 1 1 1 l l I I I I i 1 T i 1 I 1 ORDER TRUSS �� 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 7 1 1 r 1 7 1 1 1 1 CEILING WHERE TRUSSES ARE GREATER THAN 2'APART. , , ' ' ' ' ' ' r I '4 GABLED WOOD TRUSCFS AT 2'O.C.,7YP. PROVIDE DOUBLE 15-3" TRUSSES AT EDGES OF SKYLIGHT OPENINGS AND AT ENDS OF •� - I GABLED SECTIONS(TO SUPPORT HIP FRAMING) ROOF ELEVATION o 6-3/4"x13-1/2.24F-V4 GLULAM BEAMS,4'MINIMUM END 1'•6'-0' } ------- _ WY IIIIIIIIMK BEARING LENGTH. TOP EDGE FLUSH MTh TOP OF SILL PLATE - ` _ k, AT CMU WALL. PROVIDE BLOCK OUTS MI CMU WALLS AND 4 SQ COLUMN TO ACCEPT BEAM ENDS. —�_/_ �.� /_ - -, 1 1 2'-0'TYP. ./ 1 - / .i0 i�e- _ss � �..=5,-,� ,........7. --�� ,.� �' _ =\-=r r \\_ 4r.. --:r---:rr-w�=Nrrr��Y .ice _ - /.\+_ _..� ,,- '.;,Iri/'+■/+%+r �. I� - r r rsa�4�. - ■ ■ r Y r Yr •a9 ■ ■2' 0• r r - r+ ■IYP. % r r r Y ► - •Y r r r Y r r r o w r �-'• ■r w r r w - �- r ■ ■ ■ w r r r w w � / ■ ■w ■ ■w r r - r r w w ✓�- r r• ■ r Y r r r Y .ram ■r r P r r r r r ■ ■ r-w r ■Yr _ ■ r r r w r r w Y / ■ ■r Y Y w /✓ r r w w r r-.411111 ■ ■ /1 w . . Y r w / ■0' r B' r Y r rY • r ■r . r r ■ u••' r Y r r Y r r w w r / r:-=�� r Y r ■�� w r r r r ■r Yr r r w ■r • r r r w -w • ■Y r Y Y r r r �r r ■ ■ ■ ■■w •u r - r r r w w Y r� w w ■ r r - r ■ /r Y Y r r w Y'r - ■r r r ■ /Y r r ■ r ■w -w r r ■ ■w ■ ROOF r r ww r r w �. w - / / ■ FRAMINGw /�. PLANr . . . . . . . . / . . . . . . . . . . . rrr wrr:wi::-Yi:r�w�i%::4i %irri-rrr�w��i rer...F.m.m..• :r!'••:+./i •..• ■• ::+�:::+:/� ,.••�r��r/r ASC VENTILATED RIDGE RIDGE CAP, ROOF OBLIQUE TYPICAL AT AND HIP NOT TO SCALE LADDER FRAMING ASC KUP-RIB ROOF PANEL `�- FRAMING OBLIQUE PREMANUFACTURED ROOF FELT r NOT TO SCALE W000 GABLE TRUSS PLYWOOD SHEATHING ' \ .7_ .,.._._ „„„_ 12 /� -mil/ _ --„,----z,.....v3/47., c - _ �� n --s�1 - 2'DIA• %� " - -ANCHOR - -"o C OR BOLTS / OLSM Al TH 8• - 3x8 SILL AlA T� -�LL PLATE T WALL w '. r - r MINI � �=�.- - r EMBEDMENT �•EOMENi r AT r - ~� r -• -� /32•O.C. T r Y ��- P BOND 0 r BEAM r• - 4�. ■N r w / r Y- r i r r w r r r'� r r r r G �� r^ - r GYPSUM w w �. r w r r WALLBOARD w r•� �MAT OARD Ix8 H ► r �` _ ■ ■CH HEMLOCK � w w /-� ■LOCATIONS TRIM . / �� w • GROUTED wr �= r� r .r -' r ■ / ► - VERTICAL CRAFT '- ri----r----mi "it+■r�+/ M�c�rwr-• r-:rr'i--rr:Ywrrrw.Yr�h-�'iir;r■+i■ir++r++ir AL CELLS AFT PAPER FACED BAIT .1..... INSULATION TYPICAL,FULL CEILING CNU WALL -w�irY::wY• ■r//r■+' rY Yr: I-w:rw::rYr��rw n +�■O■irr�1.......1•10/...■/+ / YY w rid % w. ■ ■■ • �. -r---r�--rr' /r ++r/• r !Yr�j• dl I::ram--i-:-ir -i-i-i: Y• ii��■��;:.■r,� :rr��rr/■ -r r ; ■rrY - ri�r-::-�:.ii !�■/:�■� ��i:: r--wry----�---r.--rr•.-wrr:a„.•;/ is.v..r/ -i..:-i- --r:' ir+r+ �i --w:•Y----- ---w-►r::::1i;i. ■' •■ram L.. ROOF OBLIQUE 1. ---.:--..Y........,..;�% SECTION .- ----w--rw• Y - ■rr . NOT TO SCALE 3'-G• ROOF NOTES y FRAMING OBLIQUE :%%/' '- -- .„: / NOT TO SCALE i /// / :::..;^,.://,%//!/f////''11/////Uf,2////////I/%/!//!I" ., ,-;;;7/U/1//////////A%9H//////!///,%I//14'/I////,l///U////1� SKYLIGHT 1.PREFABRICATED WOOD TRUSSES AND CROSS-BRACING 5.PROVIDE 30-LB ROOFING FELT OVER ROOF SHEATHING. 10.FINISH CEILING AND SKYLIGHT OPENINGS WITH?'GYPSUM 4, LADDER FRAMING AND/OR BLOCKMLG BETWEEN TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED WALLBOARD MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF Rig LN31N[[RIN4 MC. ALUMINUM RAIN GUTTER, I' AND CERTIFIED BY MANUFACTURER TO MEET LOADING 6.METAL ROOF SHALL BE ASC PACIFIC KUP-RIB CR EQUAL ASTM C630-78. http://....mxcom PREMANUFACTURED CRITERIA IDENTIFIED IN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION WITH POLYVINYL FLUORIDE/KYNAR 500 COATINGS AND • maaoxRh2can CONTINUOUS FULL BUILDING 'I/ !6 1.8C0.no8052 PERIMETER,SEE DWG NO.CO3 WOOD GABLE TRUSSMIII NOTES,DWG NO.G01. P.E.STAMPED TRUSS FINISHES COLOR TO BE CHOSEN BY OWNER. 11.PROVIDE 36'x38'ATTIC ACCESS INTO EACH ATTIC SPACE. 7 FOR DISCHARGEDW LOCATION _/ CALCULATIONS AND TRUSS FLAN MUST BE PROVIDED BY A 20 YEAR WARRANTY SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ROOF ACCESS DOORS TO BE.SHEETROCK COVERED AND /. •.szmAmnW.;;,4.11 WLOMONO ORRICE 12 MANUFACTURER. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. INSULATED. 's� 425.es9.uee _�4 /` 2.ATTACH TRUSSES TO SILL PLATE USING SIMPSON STRONG 7.ATTACHMENT BETWEEN METAL ROOF PANELS AND ROOF 12.PROVIDE 1 X B FINISH GRADE HEMLOCK TRIM AT TOP OF Y4 � �- tY[FIATCX�O>?ICE --- ---��__ TIE H10 OR EQUAL SEISMIC ANCHORS AT OUTSIDE FACE STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED BY MANUFACTURER WALL,FULL BUILDING PERIMETER. 5o9.5sa.rnso ,I OF WALL MID SIMPSON STRONG TIE H5 OR EQUAL SEISMIC TO RESIST WIND AND OTHER LOADS DESCRIBED IN ••' 3x8 SILL PLATE AT WALL y/ DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE p. ........ '..... • CEILING JgST ANCHORS AT INSIDE FACE OF WALL. GENERAL NOTES. 13.PROVIDE CRAFT PAPER FACED EATT R-30 INSULATION AT -""""� """ Ix8 HEMLOCK TRIM ! IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG GYPSUM WALLBOARD CEILING. / 0 1" 2" II 3.ALL WOOD ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE HEM-FIR/2 B.ROOF FLASHING SHALL BE ASC PACIFIC OR EQUAL I CITY OF RENTON ,( OR BETTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 24 GAUGE SHEET METAL AND SHALL 14.ALL WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS AND NAILERS IN CONTACT i HILLS �+�'�7� `, 4.ROOF SHEATHING SHALL BE MINIMUM 19/32" THICKNESS BE SURFACE TREATED TO MATCH ROOF PANELS. WITH CMU BLOCK SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. �/ ROLLING I'III.LS RIrR t �� 1 TATION '�' CDX OR BETTER APA RATED PLYWOOD,NAILED TO TRUSSES 9.CAULKING SHALL BE OSI PR-255 OR EWAL CLEAR 15.ASC PRODUCTS USED AS MATERIAL STANDARD,EQUAL _ y``� 4 IMTH MINIMUM 8d NAILS AT 4'ON CENTER AT DIAPHRAGM SINGLE-COMPONENT POLYURETHANE SEALANT. PRODUCTS BY OTHER MANUFACTURERS WILL BE ACCEPTED. /BOUNDARIES AND 6.ON BO 7■ AA ON ROOF SECTION NAILS MUST PENETRATE AMI MINIMUM TER TOFTII?"INTO ROOF EDGES.PANEL TO CAUFLASHING INSING SHALLBALLATIONE EAND SHD ALL BE IATELY COMPLETELY IOR / CD NAND DETAILS _••0•■ 0 FRAMING MEMBERS. CONCEALED BY FLASHING • i Iwo - RESERVOIR ROOF, _ ellow SEE DWG N0.S55 HI 1.1113 ift* .-.4 I I I I I I I ill I I I I''' ..41 I I III II I I 1 riMill I P P ri pr"4111 I II i I I I s pi..,.1 II II I INIII••• -"Ill% -41e1P;OPP'masy Aw.dirirdlIPP.-17&111eVir.libb-Illft'llialaillikk % i all WI 4 II% WV OUR I:1014V41 I jiff/ Air ill. A111111110,AllinallhOPP'4.1 OPPpPr' . Will Nil 1111* 1111WRESERVOIR OVERFLOW PIPE, , 114W SEE DWG N0.1151 • IfikaW10*r 4 --_,t • i lib 1 114111111111111111111111111 I J0� RESERVOIR FOUNDATION, RESERVOIR DRAIN PIPE,_/ SEE DWG N0.551 • SEE DWG NO.N51 111111k • SHIELD, RESERVOIR CLING PREVENTION RESERVOIR SHELL, r SHIELD,SEE DWG NO.S57 SEE DWG NO.S53 , ° RESERVOIR OBLIQUE NOT TO SCALE 4%IMM • -111111 �' _ � - RESERVOIR ROOF FRAMING, i '- SEE DWG NO.S55 ,Ai MIR fiminiffe.,Amew/mmirminer--21111.17... .•M•I 'img- 14-•-'7---""''' --1•011•1....\611iiii** , awa ftillrial 3.0 NG RESERVOIR �� i_`i�—►f ,III I DIAMETER: 119.-0'(O.D.) _� / -I ``_`�� •,— HEIGHT: 40'-0' `- �\\�� "\�j �� RESERVOIR PLAN =Ia' o" , RESERVOIR ACCESS, SEE RESERVOIR ROOF, DWG N0.558 , SEE DIVE NO.555 - - - -,1 - z - / - i u ii RESERVOIR INLET PIPE, r -r SEE DWG NO.N52 WI." 0 Rf.' -- aHS RM6INEEP.IN4,1Na. nttp://....rn2corn ma'Jbom9,h2ccm 1 800.720 8052 - IN RESERVOIR SHELL, , R MOMO aziiiitalll 8 9F SEE DWG NO.S53 ■-a:c w,:s-i a:i-� 1488 RESERVOIR OUTLETDWGN0.PIPE,. RESERVOIR OBLIQUEWt 1 iam. WENATCHEE OfflCII SEE M52 �9.663.0,� RESERVOIR FLOOR, DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE..-.... ''�'''''� SEE DWG NO.S52 NOT TO SCALE IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG Q'�'''�'�'4'�'-"'�"2.. RESERVOIR FOUNDATION, CITY OF RENTON RESERVOIR SHELL ACCESS SEE DWG NO.S51 ROLLING HILLS RES VRX\e`i\1 �` 'i n TATION PORT,SEE DWG N0.554 �1� RESERVOIR ELEVATION p GcR� VOI R PLAN 1-= to-o 194.062 I RHBR-D09 I MP I 1W I JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN 1120 I M54 133.'47 -_ -_ GENERAL NOTES — �'""""' . ._.: STATION BASEU a - / LEGEND ..._.::::.:-_.:::::.._.._,......_...__.._....._.._,.....::...._:::::-_._.......:--:._-_,.,'..,.ems--...:::........._..,_....._:.._._.::.:_-.........,.�.. / 38! -— - - ` -- - - - -- __ ---- - - UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE,IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S - r '''-\ \ \NV)2;1 4g491\ SO 44.• j70 '-�- RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR � X`w' \ p1V 4g49 66..4. • IVO 1NN 443.T6 ��! / — — EASEMENT - - ---= DISTURBANCE \2930 \\\\_ 6pZ WIV 11 47 II ,� ._. pV 44. _ - ) j 5,, V 125 443. _/ — — — PROPERTY LINE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING IS THE RESPONSIBNTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. / 1 —1-. ,t - \N 12 SF- 3 52 J - - RIGHT-OF-WAY .7w wn - — s .x 9,� a �.�' .- M= /k-•. \01 4420 RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE i'4� 1 - �� `w_ ® MONUMENT • / ' - - - _ d` 1 OP VALVE ® PROPERTY CORNER Y \ I - 1 „ EXISTING DITCH ING �` y- "•�• _, ~! �' /r \ v -- ! E !EDONOTDISNRB _7 fil ..::7 URB '', k EXISTING TRAFFIC SICN .- ` ,,,- i / > ,a /i �R. ''- 5, ,<tttJd ,--- - t r1 `a''!d \\ l 4 r �' "- �z A \+ j p m EXISTING LARGE TREES TO BE CLEARED d' ' 7 'mo d zd -N 1' -8� W 'se., ,d d .\ a :. ,a `.> - ///: ..`f� .. • t2CONG ! — T-_ \ '`C - n ,d' �d / , ,T( •"\\g tN§,`p Rl 447w 44►•53 S,'V - + 'mow/_-� ,r \NV a4972� y�/ c - �` 1•- I ,7iT l '\'". $ \NV$S 2 2"G EXISTING GAS 436.T9 - n t / 1!,d --w :i F`. - -- -i ,� \\ .-\ `. d, etl ,C ®_+T .+ : •.,� r ,``. ',. BOt `' Re. EXISTING OIL i _ •® ` 1 Q , a� vN . . _ . — - _ . . _ . . t\ dlT 1„,,, F _/ / ._•„rar� -' \\ S POWER i ��d d � �d- S \ ( i� r' � OPa EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER i• R t ` • r� iiy 6 �d. ffi \ \ C 1 � VE Ss '.ld` \ �, ..,T �� / .� ,�, \,bo ti7 - ) \ • ? / VNl EXISTING SANITARY SEWER !J„•c -A .:'"•:....,.4 : _• -.Teo...... ......t .-/ �' - ®\ \ �5r� ; t g 1 \.T6 \ e 9 t'i \T4�q'O i& ST EXISTING STORM SEWER P� /1 �4.µ 6 fit"S �. ,,. B 4L _ �- d. , 01 6 \ '\ i OHr EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE WU-S Nll si 1 _ ! -_' 2 W - 4 TEL EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE RO,>•\NG4ot 44�� ---"--'/ d d•:i / , 450. _ _ i ,d -_�•., `I I t —w w— EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER 9 `` AK _ _ ./ ,� .. S - -' '4. :EXISTWG 40 _ `'R.t \• - d vJ* % - , .`+,', f ,x'i, \ •' ___, _ - EXISTING 1'CONTOUR t A ,T / _ "•-,. ..._.. EXISTING 5'CONTWR 'IR gr. REC po.T39 •//u� / i'+'i O ® -Q ,i aef �d 6 \�iT /., !r �� > ®Q > ' < F is' 6 4 ,1 ,i• -dtS . • ` 1-1 \ \ 1 A ,dam, �.' ,Q ' 7opre' 1 ` \ ,d • .7 �Ir TX `C} 4. 10 .26 I K /. 1 /l •r / 4- O �•..-J t'\ ty 46 up ! / --:t�-•to,d, ` .+T 4u ,eIP . //; e 1 g` � d ,'� .5 0 ;yp / 438 \_ Tritj � I � y A MAJORITY OF THE 511E IS HEAVILY VEGETATED WITH el / a' t['', ❑o ' r' ,MO M' -_ '%' ,o ' ; l TREES AND BRUSH. ONLY TREES WITH A TRUNK 10 3< .T. •, f.lr'►` Y.• .-IC 4544I 1 j • d dC�) ''-_ •d:' } Af $ _ �d.- ,d,\ ' {trl 3� i 457.}`7 43.60 DIAMETER CF 8'AND GREATER ARE SHOWN. y� i, ,N ! �, ,T / dk. �; ':' Q° >d ua - d .., _ ` Y ■ 'K RN 8 443}1 _ : v µ5.26 ,. .I , �, �,7� '� ' - � , ' • �T c: yr Z,.,> ,T @�'/ ` t iT, ,c `� t , L.._ IS ��, !l �e ' ~d' t d, ; �,. * EXISTING \ , 0 i„, `s �d �.d .4t. STATION BASELINE DEFINITION / • -•, �d 1„e, SAND PILE , d �>� +o , 4.„_ �' POINT DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASING / `,�', \' d \ d ,d �T \ 1/ \ ` \_ - ,S: >� >" •' 1 D I BEgNNING OF STATION BASELINE 172521.10' 1304945.64' I/ft ', \K. r, .� `1S'1 8 ; + \ ` 15 \ , ®� , far 2 END OF STATION BASELINE 173248.25' 1305555.81' TOP vuvE A fey a. i' t _ `0 a Q ex 4` a{! P t ' +T `"' i IF 1 POINTS DISTANCE BEARING T +o a 436.79 ;/�� ! \ :' ! gr., \ 11!2', Tl°f ,d ea• w�., '•, t \ ,T sY 1 *). A-1 25.00• 54959'54.5'E / ! ( '^%6 ' T _ �. `'`\1 04 ? \ i ,d / -�9`t�td ;V l_ ,ri41 \t i ,[ C y l .�i11 1 -2 950.00' N4000'06.0"E ti WMH w WV /. .7 - )y� ' , 2.� "> , , ,-� d111 fir, f - , I ,T 1 e 8 _. �i r' 4 ` \ Oid a 1. v 4 't' RIM 436.53 , r .k-, .� }a� e ; d - - �. - � 1 - •d r�� ,T �;'. 1 `•tr14 e24AAB-� SURVEY CONTROL DEFINITION S �r:d ,41 • �+d,�dt ��yyS,7ltt' �7 , `r t i ifi ,'\M1 t od' _ ••- \ t i' �° / ,r's ` - ! Im 111t uB1 � DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASING FI FVATION d : jd/c / ,! ,d-✓ g, t`"t , j ,` ',-- _ I - ,,a-,1 2 \- 1 OF SURVEY CONTROL POINT 172780.96' 1305541.67' / '�•ry,• ' - - S`' v&n\ov:'1\',\'i ,,, ,A.,,' .' �' , f/ -, , ! /, /: .4,. ' -\` f e r Il t �$ �, �d Ord � UE VALVE MARKER POST 172816.19' 1305170.46' / ; a J .e� .- ,e,T: 6 \ `'' I2,-.Flip- tom' i4 r r' 1•a 4 ) ,i d , d Y y � \I� ��` �, �y d 1 d d / + !! ,d '"`r�'� _ — --- ,� `�I }� ' � e OD MONUMENT 172723.83' 130590203' 451.26' o \/ A. ie0 'd- .'4,_ --,T. d a. �j' r i- -6f i k`,, \ • !, / % / _ _- f s+ �.s, d _ :�� •` Y,1'` t\.\ _ - ,\\: \ d © PROPERTY CORNER 172964.93' 1305875.86' • /,b, � - ::�..- � Tdr Q \ , ,2 ' „',` 'ab � ' ' \ Q'. / � / ! • Q�� e 48 QB PROPERIYCORNER L-._c",_�_'Or-•.1�2937.48' 13052624' 1 ,d ,"'> ' i . i:'• -d,r �v,$, ' i '., p ,- d '/' / ,T ff,t TYPE•\1 1-r h Q � 4: �y •. ,,yam !, - _ \ , / d ,d4 ,d C9 6l a J�r_�30ka / / . r ;V,,�, ,da�'�i. !:W� ,b"„'r // �] ..{,�.�` :``. , ,, ., 7T'. \ dkQ., 1` ` i , ,T RWA 452. µT 62 QA PROPERTY CORNER GJ�� 11 5,I7,}L . J +SY / 1 ,i.: '�" • / 'IV /AvV:I • r, )4'T! '" -7_,-,"4 S,\.\\ \ • i r !` ! • • -- `� ,T& ,d .e.t:5�,d NIV 1 20 44T.62 ��11 J / \ , \, g' %\ I CU7 \7-ere/ e I / 7 \ _ d C:3""1L- 1NV 44" • • o '� f ,tj+ ' ( $ d j gyp_ - -.c \ `T V 8 E '('V [' 0 ,T �3 ,r tt '^,S7( 1 `�3?-' es ,d ,i./`fir \4` """y�,�'rlo,Y 'je � "SS f f�� _ \ 1N T 44513�." l �a ' '> ' 4.1 I ;-s--\'; �� La 7'"i�d �fi �d 4 d1 1/�'' !i t5) mod" \ —`'' L.CEI�V� ® \V.! r1� ,!'i �i ',\ M1Y_PP, y�',�d_'",id 'W ram! r •_ J' -� d�,o_ /-_ \ ®�,t'\+` 1 ,3 ta,iqf / _ _ —"eG'l�) - �a•� _ RN7 LNGINfLMNG,INC. / & \ Y'' _"1__--XE-- '71• r 11. 1j ' S >6I dtq,. _ _. r— _. \t A'1p/800.726.8052 TE 7/C car , € ,.s- -- \ ( { a� +WSf w'y0 cN ieoo.m eosz / ® I ��' 1 t \ t T.. t `tD� \� RS\ c/ �ilirm TTi'1• RID IROND OPPICE `` '"ST Q' ,yy_t t 4t� r E • • 1 ''y',= __- ., 'QY•,�. —'` > 'lf Fl MNG CN14 QS Frai iAL r7 42sess.,4aa ! i ,1F 7�wmp,, W:S:P _ d ,5993 6d\ . d !> Ail\"'"""iii1 ,r, 4., *4 --•-'d 2T RFC,No.56 i• wINATGf50 66801 0 ,wi 1.- : d SOA88_10150 Y,11AC'1'NO� . \� CZ__ yg�'2 ,y/ ::0ti1;•:'�.� , \��._ __ ___,a- _ � -,_. pC,}\NG \_91196 - �j.._ ``.'L'id` ; '..'SSA# : ,I — .._.._ra _ _�t"`.," ° DRAWNG IS NOT TO SCALE VO\-.9 J i*d'1 / , }1._ elf r7A /"_ -'•P^� a IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG O 1„ 2. ® -, D `--` a .: ,v ,I : • \1,id -,1. ,(4 3T— CITY OF RENTON _ �( �°Q ROLLING HILLS RFSER e`I :^:i i STATION EXISTING SITE PLAN EX ',i G /ERALL SITE PLAN JIAI MI AU 664.:48 MO. MT SOU xa PIM am 194.062 I RHBR-D02 I MR I TV' I JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN 150 I C01 I 20,47 ` \\ , _ -- __ _ -._-- -- /__.. 1 CM�Cw111 / ____ _ �� EASEMENT ' - .. !. \\\\ \ I. . — PROPERTY WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY / __� -. _ �,-�•y-_ \ I — RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE GENERAL NOTES: i Ny _ qo .•� —7— — LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. $ , .-•1 _ _ _ _ I JITiiiT / � /° PROPERTY CORNER SEE DWG NO CO1 FOR STATION BASELINE DEFINITION HI / %, a// EXISTING DITCH •`Cn' a� d i • �' ' , EXISTING FENCE 4s5 i so Y� �Alt ;...--.;::..7. :: :.,.:'..i..:'•-• M:',..,..,''\\, ---0 j .�� ..-. - ..' ' -..ti .. :, #:._ EXISTING PAVEMENT LINE ,/ __ •. - - _ .n.\ I EXISTING PAVEMENT ' ': / ,� ,' . is i'.3%^ 4y ® —-ram '• rr \ *k EXISTING LARGE TREES // . as' PROPOSED L`\. \\� \ 4 _ / �l r-• �r /' PUMP l �� ```\,�~ p`• . �` • EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN 7 - ;r - :�► - -"STATION ,) • \\\ 111 / / 3 ! e4\ RESTORED GRASS '�, , J - : > ' PRO OSED\ ;. 4 2"G EXISTING GAS B4\,,. J / { . J 1'y < 7 `yI9 'B' ��TORM;SEWER �'�..- ,� 1 a \ pL_.............. EASING OIL •� , , i` /$ _ "sue '�. '� ��SCHARGE \ '�'. }j\k110.-.! GHP EXISIING OVERHEAD POWER r'f3 \ 4 P EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER -- - r ,� rl •'�� /- �• �^'-' , ,� 55 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — _ _ . . _ . . ._. . . _ .rr `. _ - -.' ,z4. �� --+ a\� sr EXISTING STCRM SEWER ,t$'\- -;, •7 I / - T •7..VA'':fi q ,ice% .l` t I oET EXISTNG OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ,4aq�D ;�,,� - / - ��- !/ \\ � £ e � TEL EXISTING UNDERGROUND IEUPHONE Ili 1�1 / # - / l �g � ! / �\ \ \ —w—w— EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER k % /- �s,,"7:. le' ---- ,.. �� - � 441) �� j"/ _ ___ \��\�1� - �� - - EXISTING 1'CONTOUR • - / _ — EXISTING 5 CONTOUR/'� �7- , �1 �..`^I { Y l; , t '-� PROPOSED i'CONTOUR ry \ _..EXISTING . . Aer c. %; }T' pf )� / �- PROPOSED 5'CONTOUR / ` ..�- y�r . ! ., � RESERVOIR _ / /y 7, OUTLET �:. } ��/ �. }. PROPOSED OVERFLOW/DRAIN OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE, T .I7/1,cr. S �4 p INLET , '\ �� "� ,.a\ �. e { d y / --I'''' //� ! \ ,I+�if ��I�j ' ,/' SEE DWG N0.CDB FOR DETAILS PROPOSED 494 ZONE WATER MAIN / !. ffi; },- 1$6. + • 411 ii i s !!!._- PROPOSED RESERVOIR RECIRCULATION PIPE y ,( O ;,'; + , � Q PROPOSED 590 ZONE WATER MAIN �q\ �''All ` ifi, ,1 s3 - \ tt 1 • TX PROPOSED STORM/DRAIN PIPE I � z { / l 0•y t ' O �} (rF �R`^-•��^\�•,., _- .I E I , i` ,'4! -- -- _— - PROPOSED SEWER PIPE f/( , .J ,V- 't {� ass '1 JIB• P. l . PROPOSED POWER 1 i � 3. \ - ` t l/ - �._"-;•`\ - p '!•. PROPOSED TELEMETRY r -\ it-' '''''-f: 'P.;::iy,.,::':::.'•..":' b, , ® :�\ y / \ ~' :'0,1. 1,y ` —.—.—._.— PROPOSED FENCING 4.a / , " ' ' '14 ' `'. - ��' -/ _ _'•,•\- 14.iJ• �} , I PROPOSED GRAVEL ROAD f yik , + g. a ` } lipw`� � __ �}I i, PROPOSED DETENTION POND t • t �' "� -p e r; >' 1 - PROPOS D 3.0 MILL{ON • ^t ' % \`E�4-I.IJ J g'N . . < { , • t '\ ,$` �'� GALLON RESERVOIR _ \ - \1�='�) /i "'i t.\.,'\ \. s i\\ , E) PRAOPOSED -- EXISTING - \ �" ` i }R `9YOS ! 8 7 \ �,,\O \\'\Q a ' ROAD >4CCESS SAND PqE O _�� ./� t� " 4..._ ‘...\:: , I S I Ct ` PROP03E0 FENCEdi PROPOSED OVERFLOW/DRAIN / iiii k�M' / � �? . E G ECOLOGY.. DETENTION P D,SEE DWG NO. r " / i X ... -¢ i � ;, ! /' — WALL c, Od8 FOR DETAILS. •. f / r I ,Q / ! f Atiinf :...,!: . _ems - y , , , „:4 , .,..,,,:„::„„„,:.,:„„,„:„„„,::::,:, , , ....._ ., , .„. ,.• , , , •••„,:::::::.,:,,„„:„„:„„„:::,,• / 4/ \// -_. k " ' Y` ea A. o' �:: , � � , I, , , ter'" `� �, ;l - ; .,. e�� / 'Ai'' ;=g i 'rCP4)'.` • � ' '',� /}'di - 1 \ \ ., ._Ai ; f3 .. _ \ ., ', ` EXISTING CONTOURS i /JilTli T / i, r/ �aa., �.' :ip •%, . '�. \ . _` a '% =. i \+ 1. •' i•aV1 1 \f'�.�--''/! '\ , a0\ �� ' a .. EHS ENGiNCCRING,INC. CD t�t d ' t E '4 4 _:vie"/ .2 .tx t�} ` i / _ t& // / ■irZ/ I..4 :='1• 4 WEOMONG OJ Cs „` M.., 7 • ! '� _ � , 1 • ....... wErum+cc arr8CE ••` - o - ._ soe.ssarnso al -;:---__::-/-. B� �8 - _ . . — . . — . ,x,.v ; >die`. .,4 t „, _ e_. DRF BAR IS NOT 2•LONGE C• {� .•oo•. C13� O o .•.o•.00>•L, 2. _ - _ `� .CITY OF RENTON __.;.; V,_:..... ..i ,;:,:e, , ; ._ �. 3 ROLLING HILLS RESER,.�t,I :�:`' STATION PR I ��.' T.15�i/ERALL SITE AN PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN JOB q. Mf Bli®t Y1E ]ENE 11Df 0'IB M PLB. 4fFf 1• 50 _194.062 I RHBR-D06 I SCH I TVP I JAN 23.1998 I SHOW 150 I CO2 I 89,47 • ��- - - •� ' J,- f / _,�,/ s„r., r r= ._-a _. / • - --- j !' ' �� . r � .�e35 ,_ 4 EASEMENT ---- ---'- EXISTING DITCH / HYDROSEED ALL DISTURBED / £@ :, ' ,r:' -f/ s t[i -t - - - • - PROPERTY UNE _ a e EXISTING FENCING AREAS INCLUDING POND --- , '�-• , ,' . �. / -R_- _ _ RIGHT-OF-WAY _ INTERIOR,AND BERM.SEE ,! ,,," = ti25 - '�"� - RIGHT-DF-WAY EXISTING PAVEMENT LINE - SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEED : ��' CENTERLINE T ..7. - ♦ 24' .. D d L.. ••.1 EXISTING PAVEMENT / f i ,• -- k- S re,�\\••- \, `' ---- - + EXISTING LARGE TREES DO O MONUMENT NOT DISTURB • •,, .,... .,..Y � _ /� \ - 'r. 47. • ennecezv COMER infix f H •4Rs'' 1s •\ , . ,... ,„:..„.„ ,,... H ;, „ ., J•`%. / : -r - /..:::.'''' \..i, / GRASS AREA TO BE t1,. . \ /•:' RESTORED ! J f / evh . .,,. /' / U'• /; � - ' /� 'C�' ---- - IXIS7ING GAS i 6 ",. % ,. /* _ ns , r EXISTING CIL /• 2'9 + . XFj)' �r f :' <, � tx 20'WIDE SWING GATE.SEE��• R5 ,�, - EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER „4•,�' /;,/ +{' ',r , l DETAIL ON DWG NO.CD9 I !i' ` EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER /: <'i f _, r ' i;, a . , ,; EtY , -_ \ j - �..� _. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER / _ %, / •1'J r /�'-,','�/ i/ •/ \ _ .A' `+.t1' I ___ Ow; . ... IXISIING OVERHEADIERLEPHONE 1 lI �y+� �•r'!4 /. i - i / _ AVEL PATH,SEE DWG N0,STEL EXISTING UNDERGROUND TE ONE «♦s"/ �,, \ / /%•. '"R25' •� ... -- - \��'•. FOR DETALS ..- a -....--..x.-_.. EXISTING DOMESTIC WATERLEPHf \ '• J,_ ,' _ RESTORE GRASS AREA TO _ z - - ,- t :R. E' (. �!r ``r<• i's'� f `T' EXISTING OR BETTER / p\__ \C. {t35' / ,' ..'..,,: / CONDITION = y::.y. `A" / ' ;. i 6 ' .., _ _ .- EXISTING 1'CONTOUR .,' ' �i': • C. f _ ! aP ♦r .c • ----� _ - - - EXISTING 5'CONTOUR • _ _ 0-•:•;.'7,':///2; !` / • •/ / `� PROPOSED CONTOUR --- _ ✓ y ! _ ,♦.. ♦ _ - OPOSED 1'CONTOUR • -/C) .' -_., FENCING,SEE DWG NO, _ - .. r. ` - `- PR 1. ' \� � ' -• -. s�f�� - _ /'/ �.- /'• ♦ �� \^` •' PROPOSED WATER MAIN - , a+ • - �� - _ ' r �, . PROPOSED SANITARY/STORM/DRAIN PIPE ! Cp - _ \ R DETAILS • �y-. Si-• %'.'i i • ' ...!�<�\. `' /' �`� - _ '//. O`�- 9l .. . . 4 .•`� ,/._,; �. PROPOSED FENCING / A', • ��•S ♦J♦ �� i �o'L .. •' , f "1 PROPOSED GRAVELED AREAS / ',�a , ZAi',,.t it i ,� yn�z. 4� b�0 \'S(h� .rir -•'l- -4�',� ° •\ ♦�J f\� / r' f f_i 'v�E;. '!/♦ ' ! _ -\- -�-" •�/- ,Q�'_7=*Y .. - , - /.% -.i.. _ • �, PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS , aS '`f � : ,` rr` ,,y___ \ ,/ :_ - L_ �: \ t i; FENCE CONTROL POINTS :%'','rrjl�:`if \ ' -- !� ,\ry / {K, POINT NORTHING LASTING DESCRIPTION • ,',f; ! . // ,��""�'.�:,� 4`: • - FIRE HYDRANT TYP i , k ' " � �' '2H'SY.-�� '� `\ ;.•��• `"' ;''- --,,-,r . /�,+ /'ti ( ) f..� 1 172892.48 1305293.27 FENCE CORNER !!s! /.. ♦/ ' ''., • Q7 •/• ,\ 11. _ • { 2 172990.91 1305455.80 FENCE CORNER '�° ♦r ' ,`„' .. / `,' � i .� - - \ - 3 173033.78 1305459.00 FENCE CORNER r f• I S' '♦ /� • j- °%r� "� � .. \ ,`•�� ;✓ .. Aaa • ��- "' /'. ��• 4 173035.36 1305468.68 MIDDLE OF GALE r • / ! !, 4 • - ' s ti - 5 173041.04 130550426 FENCE CORNER n J ,jv /,// !♦/``-:, `' 1`'`� / / , ..- ; 6 173072.27 1305530.46 FENCE CORNER /: :. ` -- \ ,:' '/ t• / .;' EXISTING CHAIN-LINK - r. • / / I . ♦ %�/ _ �`+ - ♦ J• , 7 173045.91 1305561.87 FENCE CORNER / i ♦ '• a �,H, - FENCING TO BE REUSED 't r'."�r' Y l':'. ` ' a / / �; . -. 4 _ / 8 17302753 130554644 FENCE CORNER i n /' / / `` y % - / • GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD,SEE \ \�, *i 9 173017.24 1305558.70 FENCE CORNER CY. /: ''� �• - O ri .' DWG Na C08 FOR DETAILS .:V. I ~ + ,' / , ` /' ~`.' 20 ...t ' \ 10'%UlN I / 10 173008.82 1335551.63 FENCE CORNER / ,r \ J i `�, • .n 4 i t \. \ - I t.% 11 172984.39 1305580.74 FENCE CORNER "V.." X! /\ • . , 0 �.�; / I°_ H:10-__ I I , '+ t i WIa;, Wig, W1� Way 12 172757.34 1305566.31 FENCE CORNER v' F v t i�`R82 /' 2 1v slj�s!�'/. %� j�i!%�4 r ! : \ 3< _ i' - _ •-y ..J -- _ , - , I y / 13 172726.17 1305529,27 FENCE CORNER ,,.. „s.,, , / \__ ''' v'♦;,, ✓ E 14 172726.17 1305449.27 FENCE CORNER {'! / �; N / \ - O_-.__ y`••�` 0� _ QUARRY SPACES OUj1'ALL EQUAL I \ _ r '/ /( / 'e %; 15 172757.34 130539224 FENCE CORNER ;}vi .l_ .� \ /�.. _k - ./ , . R15_i TO WSDOT/APWA 9-13.6.12" / ', '- t ! / r DEP1H V•---I T !• 16 172726.65 1305336.02 FENCE CORNER Fp i, j \` \ • ak r,._ - �\ WCE OF RESERVOIR FOUNDATION j / _ -r•��.� .- _ ! / / i / \. \� _ - 13 r' ♦/ 17 172743.18 1305316.33 MIDDLE OF GATE• / 4 �. 4 '``..,'+ct- ` . N 20' t 20' F, 'R7r5'_ / r r i! 5' 7,4; _ � (,xl - i i \ ��` \� Ash. f ,,.`..�� ( .. r \ zH,� / I ;- i RN9 ENOINLLMN4n,1NC. i ,! /„tyy, •.t1 r may ` R25 • /'--_ \ti, _ _ - - nn/.weo wn 4 U fir' I n 2<m, ' { ��-iiii m ' ' \ �X9 \ 16�•45• 3H tv /' 2<an te00.720.6052 , . CO „ .• . REDMOND 4 �,/ \\ i ra rer .n i , 7 S2 S i3 ;.; •\\ a •/. T ?• weNAro4R ort9es if , ? - �� ,i4:''' ` �n - t i a •/�/ \,\ ; . DRF BAR IS NOT 2•LONG e ' '.c - , / STATION BASf1JN ./ 40, GRAVEL ACCFSS_RDAD,SEE CITY RENTON DWG N0. COB FOR DETAILS `�'�, Cl i 1 OF �. a \\ \ ROLLING HILLS RESER �0��:�' ► TATION c '3.'' ACCESS ROAD �� --:',..I �,\ PR P �_ .nu \ - INTERSECTION S J2T RN: '\ EXISTING SAND PILE .... \ O O LANDSCAPING • P PLAN 1 ` PROPOSED SITE PLAN _ 3J2_WIOE SWING GATE,SEE ' V. \, _\� Al w. ALL alma q.,OW ONE SW Am OK NO SNIT •\ + �°"� {t i ♦`k: DWG NO.COB FOR OETAAS � y.� 1'=20 � �\ \ _ -- \ 194.062 I RHBR-020]SCH I TW I JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN 120 I CO5 1 90,47 , ,r . .. ... \ ��i1. ,,':' / \-'`',�....i - _ - _ s`s 4 k LEGEND ENT -� r s , ••' - �' ♦ .,. -,...4..,:,,,....,_' -- _. — PROPERTY LINE • • :`- •`'C ..rXa �,4., .;•• : _.. < `.. s s"w.� h, "s ''.,.: — — RIGHT-OF-WAY . 2•,, - 3. _ ,., ._- - ,,•� RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE } '/ •' ' , _ rr�'�.� • , �"`•- ® MONUMENT ..;}T f>'?? t ' �\ - -�� \\ \ \ _ �\ • PROPERTY CORNER ..\ --4.... V a , ` k y _ ;�, EXISTING DITCH • `tAl' •,..,:. • ` , EXISTING PAVEMENT �`.. -, -`• \ � `5- .,ti I ':...;J EXISTING PAVEMENT LINE �} r �. :' k _ • f,,'� - \,,4.-�,.;: ` • - EXISTING LARGE THE NOT DISTURB GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD l - \` •.e . +. 4 EXISTING TRM F1C SIGN Yam. � ;K �,\_._ �,,, ,�,. �r _ � . ` + 2,. J yl :. ''. EXISTING GAS / p,_ _......... EXISTING qL EXISTING OVERHEADPOWER .^"".. / '•. t .+"�, ! EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER ,.. f. rryr` ` ',. `�..` :- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER •/ rr� ,J+` fr k\,�. N. ! PROPOSED / j'�,Y4:1 ! - --_'� - - -•� ' - e r `, EXISTING STORM SEWER ,/ rr r +,, 4 �� \ BOOSTER / ! 4s5__` t'- �� ',• s �\ 14'�M ,� EVE. EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ""`" r ^ k ''. STATION \ '� �~ ��'k t 'fit + k --- -- EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE r \ / I / 8' O • \ \ iit0�'4"..• —W ;v— EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER t r JIr r - _- .. ..-. 2 a ! N. rl \ ` _\ \ ! "' - EXISTING 1'CONTOUR :` , � � EXISTING 5'CONTOUR r - • • \ / t '�' • } / T-'_.. _ -_ __ r�_- .. .._ _,._.� • r / t - \ `^^._____� PROPOSED 5'CONTOUR =` • - - �_�r,1,• *".�` / � F t i', ' I DETENTION POND OVfRFEOW WITH QUARRY SPACES *''� • \.. \. r ,xf `%" -, ,-- ! i✓ // r i EQUAL TO WSDOt/APWA 9-13,6,6-DEPTH ''/ . _ PROPOSED WATER MAIN j' '': - -„t ,'\ 7. / r�/ ! - -- PROPOSED SANITARY/STORM/DRAIN PIPE • 'jter - - _- _ ..''' \ yrr ;.� • ;\ � .'x_ _._._._._ i j \ \ PROPOSED FENCING ._�",--'� - -- •,- ....,.`".,. k` 1 I�`/T �\ + i 1 5:-1 PROPOSED GRAVELED AREAS i'/ / SPACES EQUAL TO OT APWA 9 13 fi fi DEPTH , ;s�:., : -'?, ,..._ ,'-- `�•_- ,,. STATION ROOF - ,- •\ ` .sy, .. ,%..r _.- .. .ice ,: p•, '$ OU { 5 , /y• / } v PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PUMP 1FALL WITH QUARRY r.. J/ /-.'. � r �. ,• "- • ,/ x DETENTION POND �'` _ , \ - I , tItCI? CONTROL POINTS 1/ /. 1 -. \ '\ I DETENTION POND I y `•,� / f POINT NORTHING FASTING DESCRIPTION \ ` I • ' J \ k 1 172726.93 1305758.07 POND BOTTOM 1 ;a7 1 i _ ----NI':c, • 1 ! 1 \ x I /! 1. 3H 1V �nf 2 172760.22 1305740.33 POND BOTTOM j I• ':• ' ,�- r a. Ir,r, ? _ ! 111 3 172789.52 1305708.77 POND BOTTOM 1 ' r �1 !=r, - ,..2.Jjy $�21P-t '' = 4 1CO 4 172613.86 1305673.56 POND BOTTOM 7 I II 5 172827.21 1305636.56 POND BOTTOM r ' 5' '` 1 -- -- _ --19'TYPi-- - - !• f 6 172857.16 1305646.08 POND BOTTOM 1 } a I / !� ,// '--_. __ �~�• , ! 7 17290203 1305645.01 POND BOTTOM • • I • • 4 ` -- / /f `-, ,\ \' r• t"2 : 8 172947.14 130566246 POND BOTTOM--- - '�' / - _ '•'s" _ 'y ' I �` 9 172963.10 1305686.81 POND BOTTOM ii c \ ../// � _ .,tip`. �,•\ . _ _ - _ -. 10 172961.04 1305723.00 POND BOTTOM ` -- \ 5 J 11 172937.15 130574262 POND BOTTOM \ \� I � • \ ,eA 5 • - '' = I 12 172896.69 1305763.66 POND BOTTOM \ _ 5 1 , _ 1 ' , ; ,'\ �""--._. /`l PERIMETER FENCE DWG NOPOND •BERM,SEE e \ ..'"\ I I : 'I, _ D s \. 1 FOR -- SECTION \ r{ s� r (: 8i12 HNGiHi1CR:NG,INC, • DETEN110 \ • COB. ''.\ nP ' ' I 0.1 11.I. i . L� .___...� ._...... ._...._._ ._'_ L'�."`_,yl� •., , 1.1400.720.8052 ,/ yr 1 5 '_ / I PNGlNERW 475.869 OFFICE .1488`\ . `- / _ ire .——...—r—.tea—.—.—._�! `.w`. . , ,t - \\ \i : .. ... $CIENs'IST8 WENA `' ` A�' , S�OB.BBr q50 \. I , •>g --_ - DRAIN IS NOT TO SCALE • `, • t;` \` +, \ '.2._` , - IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG O T„ z„ - eLr �` � i CITY OF RENTON I ;, — — ` ROLLING HILLS RESER t�!��:^ ►• STATION `' ` c i= PROPO ;�.. �: LANDSCAPING �� I yip PROPOSED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN II PLAN 2 All xx RE o,wrm RE4EI9m aE WEE ?LOT 0110 NO. 9EE7 ----- -- -- --_---- - 1"=20' ------ -_--- 194.062 I RHBR-D42 I SCH I TVP I JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN 120 [ C09 I 10or47 HYDROSEEDING NOTES: 1.APPLY MEADOW SEED MIX.AS DEFINED BY THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL,AT 120 POUNDS PER ACRE. FERTIUZE AREAS PRIOR TO SEEDING AS REQUIRED. OVERFLOW GRATE SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 1 74' yam. •'" 2. GRASSES IN POND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE MONTH PRIOR TO FLUSHING R DRAINING ANY WATER FROM THE nt i4 ` QUARRY SPALLS RESERVOIR R PUMP STATION INTO THE POND. _ -�_ - -- _- 456,50' 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL fBYDROSEEDED QLQP1:S AS NFL'fSCARY UAW 04 - < - ,�,-„��olc ' V 4 ✓ -5cagi t Willi WWWLT REPAIRED AND RESEEDED. _ ; TOP OF PIPE' CONSTRUCT BERM FROM NATIVE 6'LANDING MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 9D%MOD i .., '•:�PROVIDE 3*x 0.090 GAGE SUPPORT BRACKETS FINAL GRADE £ ANCHORED IN CONCRETE WALL 0 6'O.C. e 457 50 a EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 3 +1"! „A',4„ 3 1 3 "T p,r, t,:V r 'r'i SR�n.Ft�.rY:f `4 Cy.' ^6•..•`•-�1".fM'7.,hy�h' 1 i f -- _.0 ___ — -_. •qir"'h„sr�r�. y % Ty i, .}�, Yii-3,...A �,.••l�','ii•• • POLYPROPYLENE ENCAPSULATED • da�i' 4^tC •. �� •,r'.r.. '% 41.1,.�tt* yR V... ', DEBRIS BARRIER,SEE HYDROSEED ENTIRE POND, /`\\ ' \ ,v�,y ' MANHOLE STEP.INSTALL PER '�(,�6Lf\/�� `\\��i. !' ••a�,y� ' �;.tJ�. DETAILS PLAN B047 FOR 6 BERM,AND ALL OTHER n *4 MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISTURBED AREAS WITH : � iX\\/•>).,\\ � •.._ EIIERGENCEAR YEHIGH FLOW RATE WIN CCNTROL DRAINAGE MEADOW SEED MIX "5„, OVEREXCAVATE POND TO \fi/. r •� .,y%',�.y'." 447.00' 3—I �.,cf t ;,v• FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF 6" �— f 2•MN. RESTRICTR PLATE WITH 7.6"DIAMETER ORIFICE .•,A�.•� > IE OF TOPSOIL(TYPICAL) 12"HDPE L*,,2 12'OUTLET TO CATCH BASIN42, ' 45.33' 445.OD' POND BOTTOM DO NOT COMPACT 445.00'INLET POND — - � �-- PIPE IE TOT I I PIPE IE�� •\ • NATIVE SUBGRADE / t4• ��` �\�` 54'DIA TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN WITH OVERFLOW_/ I-L"""3 + 12•DIAMETER RESTRICTR/SEPERATR, RATE FOR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW. SEE CONTROL MANHOLE NOTES I 124 DETENTION POND°T BERM CROSS SECTION 0 �233' LSD ETER ORIFICE 3 0 TO SCALE CONTROL MANHOLE NOTES OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE NOT TO SCALE 1.EXCEPT AS SHOWN R NOTED,UNIT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APWA/DOT REQUIREMENTS FOR A TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN,54"MINIMUM DIAMETER AND THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLAN B029. 2.FOR DETAILS SHOWING GRADE RING,HANDHOLDS,AND TOP SLABS,SEE APWA/DOT STANDARD PLAN'MISCELLANEOUS CATCH BASIN DETAILS'. WIDTH PER SITE PLANS, 3.PIPE SUPPORTS AND RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AND DWGS NO.CO5,CO6,AND CO7 CRUSHED SURFACING(11/i MINUS)IN CONFORMANCE WITH BE ANCHORED AT 3'MAXIMUM VERTICAL SPACING BY 5/B"DIAMETER STAINLESS STEEL WSDOT 9-03.9(3),COMPACTED TO 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY EXPANSION BOLTS OR EMBEDDED 2"INTO WALL. FINISHED GRADES PER SITE PLANS, DENSITY PER ASTM 01557(MODIFIED PROCTOR),PROCEDURE B DWGS NO.C05,C06,AND CO74.THE RESTRICTR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM.060"ALUMINUM OR.064" -„'- OR C. ALUMINIZED STEEL,OR.064"GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36. 8" \;♦ 4^'- ��, M196,M197,AND M274,GALVANIZED STEEL SHALL HAVE TREATMENT 1. 15'" �`. / a�p o p�•p .p� o\‹ 5.OUTLET SHALL BE CONNECTED ROUTED TO CATCH BASIN FOR WATERTIGHT SEAL. 11/16'DIA SMOOTH BARS /\,1/ .`,\•�. �'t `1/�//,�/-\ `C/,jjj/� SELECT CUSS 8 RAVEL BACIffILL IN CRfOPoAANCE WITH WSDOT 9-03.12(1)B, 6.THE VERTICAL RISER STEM OF THE RESIRICTR/SEPARATR SHALL BE THE SAME EQUALLY SPACED(4"O.C.MAX.) ii , /�`/�♦ ��\///♦ ' ' �♦ • • • , PROCTORR),PROCEDURE B R TO 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER AS1M D1557(MODIFIED DIAMETER AS THE HORIZONTAL OUTLET PIPE WITH AN 8-MINIMUM DIAMETER. I 1 I i CLEAR ROADWAY OF TREES AND BRUSH. 7.FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS ARE TO BE OFFSET SO THAT: A)CLEANOUT GATE ISIII `� UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PROOF ROLLEDTOVISIBLE FROM TOP. B)COMB DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISERAND �' _ STRIP TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12'. LER A FIRM AND UNYIELDING GATE. C)FRAME IS S: \7�'I� ,`�� CONDITION MTH A 10-TON VIBRATORY ROLLER OR OTHER METHOD APPROVED CLEAR OF CURB(IF ANY EXISTS CB RISER REMOVE SOIL CONTAINING MORE TITAN SR BY THE ENGINEER. AREAS THAT ARE SOFT,LOOSE,OR YIELDING SHALL BE ) HOOK CLAMP ANCHORED ORGANICS. COMPLETELY REMOVE LARGE COMPACTED TO MEET THESE SPECIFICATIONS OR REMOVED AND REPLACED. IF 8.CLEANOUT/SHEARORSER GATE: ALUMINUM ALLOY PER ASTM B-26-ZG-32ACAST IRON TO CB RI ROOTS OR STUMPS IN THE ROADWAY AREA. NATIVE SUBGRADE MATERIAL IS VERY BACKFTLL IS REQUIRED IT SHALL BE SELECT CLASS B GRAVEL BACKFILL IN ASTM A48 CLASS 30B AS REQUIRED.LIFT HANDLE EITHER SOLID ORTUBING WT11 PLAN MOISTURE SENSITIVE AND%ALL BECOME GRAVELED AREAS DETAIL CONFORMANCEWITH WSDOT 9-03.12(I)B,COMPACTED TO 95%OF MAXIMUM ADJUSTABLE HOOK AS REQUIRED. NEOPRENE RUBBER GASKET REQUIRED BETWEEN RISER 11/16'THICK x 4'WIDE,LONG SMOOTH NOOK CLAMP UNUSABLE IF NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECTED. DRY DENSITY PER ASTM D1557(MODIFIED PROCTOR),PROCEDURE B OR C. LI C. MOUNTING FLANGE AND GATE FLANGE. MATING SURFACES D AND BODY TO BE k BARS WELDED TO UPPER AND LOWER UPPER STEEL BAND NOT TO SCALE MAXIMUM UFT THICKNESS 8'. PROOF ROLLING SHALL THEN BE PERFORMED MACHINED FOR PROPER FIT. FLANGE MOUNTING BOLTS SHALL BE 3/8"DIAMETER BANDS,24 BARS EVENLY SPACED 11/16"x 4'WIDE OVER ALL ROADWAY AREAS. STAINLESS STEEL. iwiiiii t 9.ALTERNATE CLEANOUT/SHEAR GATES TO THE DESIGN SHOWN ON STANDARD STEEL PART GALVANIZED. STANDARD PLAN 6033 NOTE ALL METAL PARTS CORROSIONARE ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THEY MEET THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS ABOVE AND HAVE �; R -1/A SIX BOLT,10-3/B'BOLT CIRCLE FOR BOLTING TO THE FLANGE CONNECTION. LOWER STEEL BAND,11/16"THICK x 4" HOOK CLAMP 10.GATE SHALL NOT OPEN BEYOND THE CLEAR OPENING AS SHOWN ON"MAX OPENING OF WIDE.FORMED TO FIT IN GROOVE OF 4 TOTAL GATE"ON STANDARD PLAN B-3 SHEET 2,BY UNITED HINGE MOVEMENT,STOP TAB,ORCATCH BASIN RISER SOME OTHER DEVICEP LE 54"DIA CATCH BASIN RISER 6 GAGE WIRE 2'UNE POST 9 GAGE WIRE 14 GAUGE GALVANIZED BARBS ROD MUST EXTEND 4'-6" CUPS,O 14" 0 ID'0.C.MAX. / CLIPS,4D 24" IN A 4-POINT PATTERN,0 5', /�INTO THE GUIDE TUBE,SEE 6 WARES,'R"SHAPE TOP HINGE / DETAIL THIS SHEET OVERFLOW GRATE 180 SWING 1 ......... MwY•r111Mr MMrMM•r MrM IRMA � IiirMr•YE•BM 1 � ,{ .rr:.;lli M II III :•:v END POST :::'��?::::+:? FENCINGROD z ::2x• • i?% 3si g_0 4 •I Ci � ..0.••••{::;,• 8H7 LN3I R:NG .. .:w>:.a......:�;,.:...... N�c .Inc. II>: 2{: l • P zc� 516"TIE RO D I. 3aen I FENC NG GUIDE TUBE MAXIMUM - REDMOND Or Flat M MUM GAP-3" ■�:RSC a I............ ..:..::............: :•. ;•:::,::: :•::.;•.;:;:{::::r::•,{::::.;{;•:::•:•,.:1 • k•:::{{{. I r .........:.....•: I ROD SUPPLIED BY 25e6914a ,�\i�v��,i 7� T\, ,.i. • 'Y\ i\\.i\\r \,.�. • '>` \ �I. {� 4•_6• FR ■77.07:0�:>E-� \ >� �\ •• FENCING MANUFACTURER ]j / \, / ♦ .. Ns,....... i� , \./'>. A N. r♦. �'� �- Et'l��:rrF.rr;! WE74APCHE!011'IC6 �i 1-3/16"INTERMEDIATES i /\ 'C // / /� 509.663.Di5C �, ./ BRACE RAIL ♦ Y� \ >\ \ \ - - ,c I /, L < •'� V. (./, ` ` s\ \i DRAINNG IS NOT TO SCALE -+" \ ` � � \ :: N< r\ IF BAR IS T "\ ./� y \ -�`'�' \ \\ NO 2 LONG 0 1" 2" BOTTOM HINGE CITY ��7.'y� 10'MAX. 10'Max. 180'SWING OF RENTON 4TATION Post HOLE CONRETE: 20 °R 30 GUIDE TUBE DETAIL ROLLING HILLS RESER `t�I;1 ^;►' MIN.DEPTH-36' NOT TO SCALE MIN.DIA.-12'+POST O GENERAL FENCE DETAILS MIN.3'BELOW POST 201 OR 30'SWING GATE DETAIL IF11010(PiEil SITE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE a wa RE MBA 1M1® DM - _ PLOT Pq MLL ?EEL 194.062 I RHBR-D38 I SCH I TW I JAN 22,1998 1- MOWN i 1 1 CO8 I 11ar47 �o��57 % '' - _,.._-_ - ---- - 45� ��` -- --__ ��`�_., ~ \ � LEGEND '. - ` _ •:' ' _ _. _ "�\ EASEMENT mi- A� `/ 455 /j - _ - -_ 4�J0-_ ... - _ . _ - _ _ _ _ `�`\ ..- j PROPERTY LINE .� r�' '1^F. _ /� \` RIGHT-OF-WAY i - \'C / :iM / -` Nl.-r �•f�_ _. - '- �\ \\ „ ✓'✓ RICiiT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE _ t �."rF i!tr \/ Nc�6 ZySrs3 i .1�{._.+Y, � Irtioninh d `� STRaw BALE I R aND .: MONUMENT vrr / - • N� Sfi,� .04AY LDITfH. Ikl,,, „y • // / _ . , 4/1 r VP - �` $ ``° '�,�QV EE Ot1AILS ON Mk.n.,, PROPERTY CORNER ,y / - `F......* - yr ,� •.� �� -a / / .- - R .., gsJ "\a \ EXISTING FENCE /, / / 1 ' ... \\\ ' 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT ice N. •,. / � / AS, , T" PROPOSED PUMP STATION p q 'ice �� •_ _ _ -, >xh /✓ '/ ...-- .---* , , ♦. `,. 'fr 4* �...,^\\ • EXISTING LARGE TREES ah • ph° ' ,qA �` / ,X.. ` CONTRACTOR MAY USE - 45/ -- - //i u \ \N \\\ EXISTING GRASS AREA t �� >�___ / ',,41' �/ GRASS AREA FOR L / • Pk \ / 4' CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND - \\` __ / I �/ ♦ / MATERIAL STORAGE _ -- .. /y - �; -� `�` �`\ .. EXISTING 1'CONTOUR -' // _ - /_. -_ 6J/` • ,it Y\ �/ �,+ \'�'� - EXISTING 5'CONTOUR _ — �/ / ,\ . U�, I. l _.........__ _-_____- CONSTRUCTION 1 CONTOUR C V - ♦ti ,, _ y/ ........ ° ►�♦.�,., �i OUR �^7�, CONSTRUCTION 5 CONTOUR ', 'tom - - . C4.. l ` - �/ ! - - Y �\\ 11 • �� %..i D F > PROPOSED 494 ZONE WRIER MAIN / �/ ,. �, _}� ,SEE MG NO.COB OR `,, 1♦ flip__ ^ 1,_ _ T PROPOSED STORM \\/JI�`14b0 ' /: SEWER DETAILS 1' I� • C,./,. ss PROPOSED RESERVOIR RECIRCULATION PIPE /` / - ._ - ♦ , O \ PROPOSED 590 ZONE WATER MAIN j `" j - - i / PROPOSED STORM/DRAIN PIPE �` ,,_ /; i _ ." .".. � r �, __ . , F -- PROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN PIPE ., lr p62 : '*+��/' !//�- /�y//\ ` `� -- ------ -- PROPOSED POWER „ ..:( / /I y. �j // ` // `\ �,n,/ PROPOSED TELEPHONE Si/ ,. y fi^f // T PROPOSED CULVER '' EASING ,, 's. �` '` • t. ,, �` I . / W r ,� -v; / 41 -,�,4..y RESERVOIR 1 '// \ 1 3 3� - PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCING /' 1fl �i _ `E r FOO7INC-AND PEBIMEIER -ti. ✓ I , `; 4 fir:... • • r i / i/ DRARIS,SEE DWG-NO.CIO FOR , \, # !7Y► et:oc5°oDnm;aos•vrccav:to.canavnvc- PROPOSED STRAW BALE BARRIER ..d ,t �„ / \... T / i DETAILS \ 1•1, -.�.,1.. ��°►e 1a r - PROPOSED RUNOFF CONVEYANCE DITCH t • O I �' • jy�` ACCESS GATE O �7., , - / T 1111 fl f . t r /. PROPOSD CONSTRUCTION UNITS • .i`:;: .Y r s, p _ii,' L It 463 J /.i.ri. i•�INr'� li ♦i - . r. • / +Y•pY `�� i r e+i � Y , , "� s o, f GENERAL NOTES o • / �. 455 % EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE,IT SHALL BE THE ► .• r s \ \ / i et CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID f DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE i/ '. \ �•-��.Y C,• , ffIII �f , ,,l _ ,,, PROPOSED ROAD AND UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE,SEE APPROPRIATE SHEETS \ fii• FOR DETAILS r. �' \ PROPOSD - --�i/�•• `` S + ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. cr R' �, ACCESS � +++.• 7. TEMPORARY ST,:1: n ✓ \ er � O:ROAD ,t . - - r ��' .1..-� . __ _ .. - ,_ 1r 'NFR / _ --p-- a STORAGE OF ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IS TO BE CONFINED TO WI7HIN THE y SEfi N0:COd \ \ ' /• - ,, CONSTRUC110N UNITS SHOWN. J \ � . -----.� v' .`� _ i PROPOSED OVERFLOW/DRAIN r a • A I \; ` i - SEPARATE TOP SOIL FROM RDANWNG SOIL TOP SOIL TO BE USED IN CONSTRUCTION /r a` t--.�_ ; DETENTION POND e . e OF DETENTION POND AND BERM. SEE DWG Na COB FOR DETAILS. J - 'WO �k p6r ill `_ V. ` -_ AS9 EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED AS BUILDING OR TRENCH BACKFlLL. ° ...EXCAVATION FOR • s e`, .. ' V1• PROPOSED 3.0 MIWON \ ' ' h �,• T• ph CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EASING OR BETTER CONDITION. ° GALLON RESERVOIR (I 0 ' •y \ \\ ! 1, _,_'L...•`A TEMPORARY SLOPES SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS AND a } f � � , - \\ - - �p - _.. . - 1 SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC DURING NET WEATHER TO REDUCE EROSION AND I •, '\ ',. : \ SLOPE FAILURE POTENTIAL : `'. i i \\- \ J _._._ N - -._. a I EMIT SIEVE ANALYSIS AND SAMPLE OF ALL BACRFlLL MATERIAL FOR ENGINEER _- �z(�y' SUBMIT ''Q \ EXISTING SAND PILE S&, 'AAA 4 T APPROVAL, `\ \. / CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE DETENTION POND FIRST TO PROVIDE A \ � 5; a \ , g'.._ � SEDIMENT POND/TRAP FOR OTHER VIE GRADING WORK OR SHA ROPOSE AN . , �a�,, a � \ �-—— ALTERNATIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN THAT MAY INCLUDE A S LER,SEDIMENT ' • '�" 1 ', `ts' �c•a ( 0,. �l _ - `w' POND/TRAP AND ADDITIONAL INTERCEPTOR DITCHES.CONTRACTOR ILL'SSIBMIT ` % % J (� t,° r y�. a SEDIMENT PLAN TO ENOREER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSIRUCTION.•i ,-� ,aI 46`? - - 4:J , }1) x I O1 DONOT DISTURB TREE BASE //� 7� cS/✓;. \u' / - - xHz[rfMlNaee?INc,Inc e t'/- /( ASS • ' i ` ° - CONTRACTOR MAY _ I N,CONSTRUCTION'LIMITS ALL Tad ./ I S • mono 8062 �' _ - - �� - NOWT BE DISTURBEDIUNLESS DETERMINED 0 BE A, `.�..ttrt _ - i� ` r Jn ,`` \ - CONSTRUCT A 200'x 100' � /• V i 1 - ' CONSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION AS DETERMINED BY,THE Y i i a _ SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION - 4 atOMaNO , , , ,. / 66�j = I / STAGING AND MATERIAL \- CITY.APPOINTED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. / y i _ _ - 425.869.1488 Z . , • • . `t+Putz' - / STORAGE AREA IF NEEDED i� /- fi _''��`,t,'�� .. •$. I r r _ 77 �' ) ../- �� *reurcrsito►ne[ �/A .3 so9.9sarnso ' - - �`' - - 46h PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL / e / - / ' I Ol-:.; 4. / . ' i I 5 DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE •�. FENCING,SEE DETAIL ON ,\F R5 /`-, ' '{' f / DWG No,cm / A / f's IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG D °1 "rove" `� , , o II a 4h j. ° •CITY OF RENTON ¢�;' '.1.Y —— _ = J. R . -/` ;.,. - ROLLING HILLS RESER1,•10;1. � '.TATION �Cv� . Y ' • GRADING CONSTRUCTION GRADING&TESC PLAN • ND TESC PLAN JOB ra Nt moms RE.m Mt A. We m ► I 194.062 IRHBR-D331 SCH 1 TVP 1 JAN 23,1998 1 SHOWN 1 30 1 C06 1 3or47 t FU TER FABRIC FENCE NOTES; %? ._- .___ - -• A.THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT Erosion Control Notes TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS.WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY,FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPUCED TOGETHER ONLY AT A -y THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS AND THE CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE.REPLACEMENT,AND UPGRADING OF THEM IS THE SUPPORT POST,WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP,AND BOTH ENDS yr, RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED AND PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.THE ESC REQUIREMENTS ARE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. // LOOSE HAY WEDGED BETWEEN BALES REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. TO CLOSE ANY AND ALL VOIDS B. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,NO . CONTOURS(WHERE FEASIBLE).THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A 0 •..T): DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED.THE FLAGGING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF ` MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND .N.I TIGHTLY PACKED AND STAKED CONSTRUCTION. (MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). HAY BALES $t �t { THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES,AND IN C. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED,ROUGHLY 8 INCHES WIDE AND 12 4t� zr. �` SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR VIOLATE APPUCABLE WATER STANDARDS. INCHES DEEP,UP SLOPE AND ADJACENT TO THE WOOD POST TO ALLOW j _ .",:j�,�%+ T_ !' . THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACWTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATE°SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THE ALTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED. • �I4 -:'� 4'DEEP TRENCH- Fi 4449.- - PERIOD,THESE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED(E.G.,ADDITIONAL SUMPS,RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES,ETC.)AS NEEDED /, D.STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL USE A WIRE MESH SUPPORT +�// • •• �4,. 4 !- - TO MATCH BALE IN FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS. FENCE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UP SLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING 0� • .•.�r 4`'474I,.�j`4 - .. r WIDTH HEAVY-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG.TIE WIRES OR HOG 7/' 4 • THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED y, RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 �� • ¢"' FUNCTIONING. INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE BACKFILL AND COMPACT SPOILS FROM ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. ,t ;A "-" TRENCH ON UPHILL SIDE OF HAY ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION,INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS,WHERE NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 15 DAYS,SHALL BE 7, BALE BARRIER IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH APPROVED EROSION/SEDIMENTATION METHODS(E.G.SEEDING,MULCHING,NETTING,EROSION BLANKETS,ETC.). �� E IN ADDITION,20 INCHES OF THE STANDARD STRENGTH ALTER FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND /4 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE 2 MORE THAN 36 6NI BE STAPLED TO ORIISTNL TREES SURFACE. ALTER g PROJECT.ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. / F.EXTRA-STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ' HAY BALE BARRIER DETAIL WHERE SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CCNTROL IS REQUIRED,FAST GERMINATING GRASSES SHALL BE APPLIED AT AN APPROPRIATE RATE(E.G.ANNUAL OR %� PERENNIAL RYE APPLIED AT APPROXIMATELY 80 POUNDS PER ACRE). ELIMINATES THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE. IN NOT TO SCALE SUCH A CASE,THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED.IT SHALL BE APPUED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO INCHES. POS15 WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF STANDARD NOTE E.APPLYING. G.THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFlLLED WITH 3/4-INCH MINIMUM DIAMETER TEMPORARY RUNOFF CONVEYANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM ENTERING THE PROPOSED PUMP STATION PAD AND RESERVOIR AREAS WASHED GRAVEL. DURING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE SITE GRADING. H.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED � G� SLOPE ROUGHENING IS REQUIRED ON ALL EMBANKMENTS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER. USE DOZER TREADS TO CREATE GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE.BUT NOT BEFORE THE UP SLOPE AREA HAS BEEN Y DIRECTION. PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. DURING CONUCON. / I.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH j SPRAY WATERA S RNEEDEDITORCONTRIOL C DUST.SHALLB SEE DUST PLACEDIN ABATEMENTALL �PLANSIN ONINLET THIS SHEETS AND MAINTAINED AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT CLOGGING. RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY // REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. : BOTTOM EDGE OF LAST PROTECT BORROW AND STOCKPILE AREAS FROM EROSION WITH STRAW MULCH AND/OR TEMPORARY SEEDING. C%////////1/%1G1////0!//////r0/////U////////b!%!H//%!H//////!ir!%////df//////N,9/////%/II/%//%/,4!%/U/,i'1l/////////////H/e,////ICY//////i, BALE MUST BE HIGHER I THAN MAXIMUM WATER LEVEL ALL TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON STABIUZATION OF THE SITE. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED. 6, MAXIMUM WATER Y ' £ be;i i$7Y LEVEL (RCN 46 61.655) . .-fq 99�® tat EXCAVATE AN 8'X 12'TROUGH,LAY SILT FENCE BOTH IN SIDES OF FENCEGH AND FlAND ON LL WITH WSURFACE ASHED ROCK ON �pPp Y' / 4�\N DO NOT DISTURB SURROUNDING VEGETATION. STRAW BALE BARRIER PLACEMENT 6 4_. EROSION CONTROL FENCE FABRIC EQUAL TO NOT TO SCALE X'"'C WON GTF-400E,WITH AN EOS=0.15mm. '._ SECURE AND SUPPORT WIN 2'X 4'BY -.:..?I, $ .N. 5'LONG STAKES,6"(N CENTER,BURIED 1 - � � .Z 2.5'.INSTALL 2'BY 2'BY 14 GAUGE \/ 111 " +,:� '.� ),"" > WIRE FABRIC.USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS �� iy: t;-. yj",':~1' TO ATTACH WIRE TO FENCE f�� r`vlA " ' ;a"yV` h /�j`r /'�/� R= 25'MIN fir' :- Af• `/\,'��'\/��/,``./ DEPTH=12'MIN L r I•Vt�W� / 7// `�i�/�/i>/ \ \ ,` 2'TO 4'ROCK � /ma y/, /•<<\' �/ STRAW OR MULCH,2"DEEP, TEMPORARYA, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / /y / ONE FOOT WIDE STRIP UPHILL OF FENCING. AND TRUCK WASH-PAD DETAIL \ \ NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL FENCING NOT TO SCALE DUST ABATEMENT PLAN - CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST FROM CONTAMINATING �� ADJACENT HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES. /�� HY9ROSEID AND STRAW MULCH .../`GA - DURING ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK OPERATIONS THE SITE WILL BE WATERED WHERE OPEN DITCH IS USED. TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST. ryO��i, RN[[NOIN[[RINO,INC. - CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST NOT ONLY DURING mamo.mh2= AQ " CONSTRUCTION HOURS BUT DURING THE WEIXENDS AND EVENINGS HOURS. e00.T20•E052 1.5' 1I `�. I1 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPES THAT CAN NOT BE WATERED DUE TO ��f'I5 I' � ��0 ��CC,.:' ,. ' • _ 2 �% 2 EROSION WILL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC OR OTHER SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE ( METHODS TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST. •z,,l*:itlli *JF_ WINATCNI[O►Flq 0 ,c NOTE: MAX SLOPE=1.00% we.6earnso - TEMPORARY SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION S VVn' RUNOFF CONVEYANCE DITCH DETAIL DUST. / D N1NGBAR IS NOT TO SCALE y . ,;; :,.,.,:, `� CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF j IF BAR IS NOT Y LONG O'�'�•� �•�•�'I, ��7��2 � ECOLOGY C L 5 a ir+E 4 r P.0, _r I CITY OF RENTON n ROLLING HILLS RESER a.1;> ^;►1 i TATION _ C��s�%'. ' • GRADING D TESC DETAILS all FILE Dlf M REMOLD DAL WA NM %LET Ptp. 194.062 1 RHBR-D34 1 SCH 1 TAP I JAN 22, 1998 1 SHOWN 140 I C07 I 40,47 / r - LEGEND — — — EASEMENT i lbf>. :.. �� — _•_ NE - -'� - PROPERTY u =ifs -�--5 �/ —_'� � - -� A-- // - RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE e \ 4/. . I L AS OF XISTING UTWTIES ARE APPROXIMATE, - ue -\ VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION / "�, \ — ; t t \ \- sue_..�' _ .._ '_r_yr '' �.`� I • MONUMENT SEE DWG NO.COI FOR STATION BASELINE DEFINITION i \ t;'s \ / HI -.\- • PROPERTY CORNER / - ,/ ' �,� ^ -•5, 4.* ` \ I EXISTING DITCH �/,alf. i �! _ _ `s° — - •- .77. _ilt -•'. , I • ' • - • EXISTING FENCE '" _ r _ _ `- I/ ISTING PAVEIENT E i _ .ti+\+-Y`Y u by .•� \ t2 •• ..� ; I 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT cY • /' _ `' ' PROPOSED' __ ,` \. .. EXISTING LARGE TREES J.._ Xi .--STATION Vi..3 `\��\1• •'• e s��,•,,':; ,?,5- DUSTING TRAFFIC SIGN / - ..' / 3 ._\ .� Q; \ ! .• \\ \ \, ♦ `+�� \ RESTORED GRASS • EXISTING GAS `�0 9! ``' j// / .,`F rt� ,. < , \e w Q TORMt'�S�EWER 6♦`,,\.. 1, \ al¢ EXISTING OIL ' - i SU7ARGE � r�� aw EASING OVERHEAD POWER - / _ • • �'• �Th,... �� '\ v IXISTNG UNDERGROUND POWER _ �" rg.- _ _ .. ,•a4--/,/ek, ��' " �:.• 55 EXISTNG SANITARY SEWER // / a / „ Sf EXISTING STORM SEWER _ - _ _ _ Yja� � .�� a, I aiT EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE '� / Y. �/ - / �_'Z, \ \ ! �l. TEL EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ;4 .- A'.' .- reo _ /�/, � • � iii,-;;:.' �� j, ,�\ `\ —w—w— IXISTING DOMESTIC WATER / \ r l �\/ c , ! \ \`� ¢�, II. __ EXISTNG t'CONTOUR a--•., /', W.,,: �' y?- �^I/ / ;` \�.. it +f \ ♦\ \ ` 't` - — -.• EXISTING 5'CONTOUR /III - - - EXISTING'' h < �� -- i 7 7 y� - �--�� PROPOSED I'CONTOUR �/ \ ' / 4i i PROPOSED 5'CONTOUR / ` / �yt' 74 ' _'- y% RESERVOIR li ` OI}1�T 1 PROPOSED OVERFLOW/DRAM .�,� • °°• i/ ,/NLET .. \. - ! ,I \ OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE, { d �/ y il' It \ , '' I, \ ,,IF SEE DWG N0.CDB FOR DETAILS$,J / i -� �! i • '•7T PROPOSED 494 ZONE WATER MAIN • / • v + �i 1 f It, �r if ��, • (} iii PROPOSED RESERVOIR RECIRCULATION PIPE ® n ✓,:.,-'ice'Al \ (,k _ '`• - • �� '1' �� _ PROPO r ink SED STORMD 590 ONRAIN PIPE E WATER MAIN 8 { -• ,'a` ` •' ?•. O l`1l 1; I 1 °'> ` \ _ i S — - PROPOSED SEWER PIPE ,� /�/�1 / � ` �i, Au1. ,, i PROPOSEDP POWER .44 .,/,`. .. / < .r. ` \ . 3, ® ` �►.. ;��.• ` fjfr 11, PROPOSED TELEMETRY • \ • /3 .a, / , / ,'.' a.� I ' �\ w 111111 �. —.—.—.—.— PROPOSED FENCING I'' i +Lt.. ` ' : 43 _ j .,\ ` - _ \ ` :,,`. N 1 PROPOSED GRAVEI.ROAD Q7 r \ ' "` 4' r Q ; fie. Ne No?'''' \ `� '•- ;� ‘,...J �tPROPOSED DETEN110N POfO/4{ ° �� + PROPOSED30Mfl.t(ON ^t % '` ,, GALLON RESERVON • \ -. • • € e • :l \ \ f 1 PROPOSED\ \' , . r�}- _ a • \ro , ACCESS EXISTNG _ \ :.____, �3}� I ��'�y,, . Q \ ROAD 'S'i II/ SAND PILE `\: - 1 `i1 W ' '�" Mr. _ ° ` Ci. ,\ PROPOSED FENCE PROPOSED OVERFLOW/2RAJN `tw'�Y %/ 14 A`r ' ••' \`�'+, i i `\ - ^ _EXI 1G ECOLOGY, gat/\ � �\ a:TENTION POgD.SEE DY(G N0. 0 '' ' :fiJ{ �Q / LLL��3 v. a i. t �gO®WALL \t VJ i Cd8 FOR DETAILS./ c7 i�r vl. / . ..,,,A.; -0 tzi itta 6„df '1;•i,,', i„ • ,_,i Pi ) „:„..! , • , ,d, \ ., „.„.:i.„ • ,•,! , , „ , , ..; i _ __ ---- .... . . / M1 / `� 2, '% f T$ . s \ 'f' I/`' i r / I\17i� - / .i I j \ �, ' /\ It' J ! V ' • e . = . / \ ' s 0 ' _ I / DEVELOPMENT�t ^ �� ' . 1'` ,/` 91 ��° CITY OF RE,,,f / �. / \ 'i,' ` , / 5 ,r 1 /�a.�/ i 1 ' ir �� .., \ `\ / '/, • �` tom- _ `� ``Y AUG 2 i V, J^ ` �g' y • EXISTING CONTOURS / / •'-• \ ,a. s ti,H! ;,; +, tj a � • 8'. ,, 0 \ • • 6 \b'' ' _ \ \ A I / Ai i 1T'. F3�,Kf( l \\ '•I \ \ it l - - . ��. . ` �1�.i 4 ..._ \ '� _ ®! te ../..,/,..z. -- ___.(B \ .. _ ,.), -- 'RI-12 Attellow.1112cern + \ \, • _/ 8 _ aw Imalamlma 1NC / \ ` 'lu'- �, �i \\ i \`_MA _ ,a\ _ i ••»_i,tt_I I.i 7� 4tS8B411BB / \�1�' \� .\ 4 -t _ 577� `- ...._/ ., t>ca�,t;�rE>rr f■ wllnu cOTC' 509.86.1.0150 • • . — — . . — ,1 \'`'Q•' - --0,;:iv T;'W,f".!`� .,'__•-__-0% _ _ �---_.� -r — DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE kiimmEgilimi tp ill ��;7��. IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG 0 r r ' .,: + ra : _ CITY OFREIVTON +, 7 ., �`= . X. • '� ROLLING HILLS RESER �e.',t•^;` i' STATION 's4! PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN PR it= �` RALL SITE PLAN 1•= 50' GO GI. MG MGR i•1a� ME 5uic MN0.1 m al, 194.062 I RHBR-D06I SCH I TW 1 JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN 150_I CO2 I 80.47 G '/ /" - PROPOSED LEGEND / ! 494 ZONE WATER MAIN - ,�j / / t:l - _ `•-�L` Q`__.--- "111.t G -1 GRAVEL ROAD RESERVOIR RECIRCULATION t�6 r �e '''''''''''''.1::: r : _ 7 Uii^- ly( -- ^' _ _ �d DETENTION POND 590 ZONE WATER MAIN / ,/ . - - • _ - - ' _ _ _ � s s - - - - _ _.._ ... -- JANITARY SEWER PIPE r._ / GENERAL NOTES: - •;'':;. .•r ' .. - ' -- ..... _ - - -. • .. .-- -` l a� - $- _____ 5OuP ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTIUTIES ARE APPROXIMATE, / _ - - -- -- TELEMETRY CONDUIT / VERIFY LOCATIONS PROP TO CONSTRUCTION. - r �� _ . '--. - • r? _.- _.. SEE DWG Na C1O FOR STORM SEWER,SANITARY - - ;'- f , > --..,-: ��v-f,, / �. N5L PIPE AND FITTING LEGENDS SEWER.ELECTRICAL AND TELEMETRY PROPOSED - / f 4. po`..,_ ' 4,_�,Z _ -.- UTILITIES. _ / ,r r/ .7 `�__ } / �` ' 1.STA.3+72.5,17.6'L,PROVIDE: 27.STA.5+89.4,113.9'R,PROVIDE: SEE DWG NO.CO1 FOR STATION BASELINE DEFINITION. /' P �r' .• __ / _ (1)-CONNECTION TO EXISTING VALVE,PROVIDE FITTINGS (1)-16'DI CONVEX VII2T 221/1'BEND(MJId/J)WITH '` `• _ AS NECESSARY,REMOVE VALVE MARKER POST AND THRUST THRUST BLOCK / BLOCKING,SALVAGE MARKER POST TOP OF VAULTS TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED-GRADE ,';�1:'f';1 / +'w ~,� - / �yr - 1). - - ' Li29.STA.5+89.4,126.r R,PROVDE: - /-"" - r. / 6 _ - 3.STA.3+85.2,17.4'L,PROVIDE: - j ,/' f ��,, (I)-16'q CONCAVE VERT 221/2'BEND(MJzMJ)WITH / - 6 - f_ - •'~ NN * - .-,_ (1)-16'DI 90'BEND(MJ01.1)W11H THRUST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK / 'Ce�,:1�, ,•, %r r X s J.�% 7R 5.STA.3+85.2,126.9'R.PROVIDE: 32 STA.7+25 7, 147.6'R,PROVIDE: ._ / `1.L,Y / i I /\4"- .;'.bxl':> Q 1)-16'DI TEE FUR 1 -4•DI 5. BEND MJ,P MDE THRUSTK r,• _._ .. /. / - 71 ( (FUR) O ( ) BLOC ,i - (1)-16"q ADAPTER(MJxR) '\ 0 / `, /7 Dc�/ fir • - �, _ _ y. r�t�ry�" (1)-16'DI GATE VALVE(FLxMJ) 33.STA.7+27.6,139.3'R,PROVIDE T)c� i- !' /• / ^� /- , - ,.,..-" ''.l f 1 • Q � (1)-16'DI BUND FLANGE WTH THRUST BLOCK (1)-4"DI 90'BEND(MJoAMJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK 57 ' -s 1r / '' 4 ```'�` ^ 1,1 ^ .- - - 6.STA.4+35.2,126.9'R,PROVIDE: 51.ST0.7+69.3,136.6'R,PROVIDE: • {7.'-:."- .�' .'• / / , .r� %-� ��,,,.-r �\`• - / \ (1)-2'AIR RELEASE de VACUUM VALVE ASSEMBLY, (1)-16'q 90'BEND(MJXNJ)N1TH THRUST BLOCK _ 31 "V �' %` �"K+D''' ___ _ _ ^ ,,.-" _ _��.,, : \ -. INSTALL PER RENTON STANDARD PLAN BR51 / _ - :rr / 16 DI 90 BENDTH THRUST BLOCK '• - ,`'•''. .. 53.STA.7+69.3,105.7"R,PROVIDE: 1 ,,.�..,� ,7� i'�ip, TA.4+83.5,726.9'R,PROVIDE: (t) (MJtd1J)WI - _ - -'r'...- :: ,% / .. / /` := ��t'1�-.�. 6'x ^^^,,,.^^''^ .� \.� M..:�t (1)-16"DI 221/2'BEND(NJxMJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK - _. '! : ; - . - `'`.r' /`rJQ - ^"'"''^,,,r•`""" _ - --Cr - THRUST BLOCK .\- _ ,....4-,:, 55.STA.5+78.1,105.T R,PROVIDE: • / '\ -.. 10.STA.5+27.5,108.T R.PROVIDE: (1) 16'x 6'DI TEE(MJzFL)WITH -- _ - •_ `"-.. (I)-16'q 221/2'BEND(MJrMJ)W17H THRUST BLOCK (I)-6"DI GATE VALVE(FL,o4J) - --Fa'.? ' / __- __ -- - -� ,,..- '// \ ▪ "N_'",,.'' _ (I)-6'DI PIPE LENGTH TO FIT /' a ` -i_38 x 't' \\,/ I SEE DWG Na MQ3 12-STA.5+89.4,708.T R,PROVIDE: (1)-FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY,INSTALL('ER RENTON - 0::. _ 'V ' rr FOR CONNECTION\ (1) 16'DI TEE(MJxfl) STANDARD PLAN BR24 O 100'RT - 4. - _ /% ��,. - / ,. TO BPS (1)-16'DI GATE VALVE(FLxMJ) - _� _ .�:;^,,.^" •/ �t _ _ 21 � `� (1)-16'01 PIPE,LENGTH TO FIT 57.STA.5+43.2,105.7'R,PROVIDE • - t >Z:A't; i / \\\`. �1, .y-"' 459 - - - - ,/ �. ,. �� 457_r, \';1•� (1)-16'z 12°DI TEE(FLKFI)VATH THRUST BLOCK '>I•R �/' iD � t1 �4`` 14.STA.6+54.6,108.7'R,PROVIDE: 2 16'DI GATE VALVE(F 04.1) 2 r2 %: ♦, '� �1,s: / �'. �""^..•"""" %i' '.II tea} `, .I (t)-16'x 6'DI TEE(MAR)WITH THRUST BLOCK (1)- c. ., Cti / !j��l s� /.i,.- _ /� -�1 \ \ O 12'01 GATE VALVE(FLMJ) // i' '6� ..-"' ^^ / 461` 0 , I • (t)-6"DI GATE VALVE(FEd1J 3 '%r / " r _ .: _ ¢6Q - •/ 0)-6' PIPE,LENGTH TO FIT 59.STA.5+26.9,105.T R,PROVIDE: 1 DI / ' j i r q�.o /k: i, \, fl I; 1 -FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY,INSTALL PER RENTgJ (1)-16'DI 221E BEND(MJAIJ)VATH THRUST BLOCK / r • T /r _ /�/ .��/ t ,� ®\ STANDARD PLAN BR24 O 115'RT r i r ? 1 62 STA.4+84.8,123.1'R,PROVIDE: t� 4 • 16.STA.6+62.1,108 Y R,PROVIDE: 1 16'DI 221 BEND MJ dAJ WITH THRUST BLOC( " -r /• 6J _ 1, , `' .�=' (1)-16'DI 45'BEND(MJdAJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK , r / / _ y°+ G;; 64.STA.4+6@0,123.1'R,PROVIDE: �/� r -- +/ 1 T, •"+.,```.,,•,�\ -- \ 18.STA.6+92.7,139.3'R,PROVIDE: (1)-12'x 16•DI CROSS(NJxMJ) t ,' r "�/ / ..../ f ;i'if J • S `---- • \\**4-.' ` 20 STA.7g14 3 451 BEND 3(R PROVIDE: 1H THRUST BLOCK (2>-12"q PIPE,LEN TO FIT � << r �b '�- . Cy :':r �� 2 -12'q COUPLING ,, / f� / 46 'y� / �� + 1 9.' DE: (1)-16'DI PLUG WITH THRUST BLOCK 'f' '/� /�. „� (�' !/' _ ; \ (1j-16•q TEE(FUdAJ) �j� , / . /7 t t * Si" - - t!. �'.'"� _ �' (t)-16•q ADAPTER(MJxFL) 68.STA.5+429,37.2'L,PROVIDE: / ,/' rw��Il . /,y r - / • - _ _ t� " ,�.11 i'' ` \ (t)-16'z 4'q REDUCER(FLAW) (1)-12'DI CONVEX V4tT 45'BEND(MJIdAJ)WITH THRUST �"� / ,•2-'<% (/ - _ �c t i .1\ ... BLOC( QJ // 45r-'"}' I• / '.f i♦ ' - r A4e ‘,._\ 22 STA 7+14.3,214.0'R,PROVIDE: el :. \ \ (1)is 16•qTEE(FLzMJ) 68.STA.5+429,44,4'L,PROVIDE: ?+ t - / - \\ \ (1) 16'DI GATE VALVE(FLKMJ) (1)-12'DI CONCAVE VERT 45'BEND(NJxMJ)WITH ri ,. - 4, _ `�Q6 _ f f�.. , 0) 16•D1 ADAPTER:).p) THRUST BLOCK f SA,, - // / ,. RESERVOIR OUTLET, \45T ▪ �;./1 1 1iFg1 - \� \ ` TA73 ' ,PROVIDE: 70.STA.5+42.8,98.7'L,PROVIDE:j / - - _ SEE DNG N0.A152 \�l ;� - c RESERVOIR INLET, \ \ (1) 18"q 90 BEND(MJdAJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK (1)-12'DI TEE(FLzMJ) ,' �, /) t � �?'• 10 SEE DWG NO.M52 ` \ t ' (2)-12"DI GATE VALVE(FLAIJ) t t'. / ;r tf.•" - - _ O ': ``\ 1< \ , ! '' (2)-12"q PIPE.LENGTH TO FIT >'.✓ r�,{ /' ' `\` O \ "� \ ` V \ l ,% (2)- 12"q COUPLING }/ i 2.APPROX 15 LF of 16'DI PIPE 23.APPROX 17 IF of 16'DI PIPE 56.APPROX 35 LF of 16'DI PIPE WI / } 4 'a, ` 1r ' +*' •A ;r � O j - ?...j. . - t ' Ilneo f 1�'i,76i��illl�• 4.APPROX 144 IF of 16'DI PIPE 25.APPROX 31 LF of 16•DI PIPE 58.APPROX 13 LF of 16"DI PIPE f T<4, B„I i 7- -- I1 t `' 463 RESERVOIR OVERFLOW/DRAIN , • ' 7.APPROX 98 LF of 16"DI PIPE 26.APPROX 48 LF of 16'DI PIPE 61.APPROX 45 LF of 16'DI PIPE r / r / • `` t 9/ • '1 llli ;`i \ PIPING,SEE DWG N0.!M51 "4\ AO;j� • e, b , ? / `, 'E W _ _� , 9.APPROX 47 LF of tfi'DI PIPE 28.APPROX 13 LF of 16'DI PIPE 63.APPROX 16 LF of 16'DI PIPE ` _VAS • ® r P t\ - - - , . 11.APPROX 61 LF of 16'DI PIPE 30.APPROX 10 LF of 16'DI PIPE 65.APPROX 143 LF of 12'DI PIPE .,/ rrSip\ , ,•,/ Q \ \' y_ \ f_ j • \• 13.APPROX 65 LF of 16"DI PIPE 31.APPROX 135 LF of 4'DI PIPE 67.APPROX 10 LF of 12"DI PIPE r f r / TI +/ 1 , 't 0\\ \i O ® .6. �1 • \�\ \. , rr' �-`'�. 15.APPROX 7 LF of 16'DI PIPE 34.APPROX 11 LF of 4"DI PIPE 69.APPROX 54 LF of 12'DI PIPE �.' ', a'',3).'41' .611/ .r /• \ %�/ �'� `� `\\ 17.APPROX 43 IF of 16"DI PIPE 50.APPROX 12 LF of 16"DI PIPE � 19.APPROX 19 LF of 16'DI PIPE 52.APPROX 30 LF of 16"DI PIPE cr 1 • ©/ \\ 21.APPROX 74 LF of 16"DI PIPE 54.APPROX 191 LF of 16'DI PIPE /41 \ U't I 1 it i ® \•\ l ), -A - ., ��`..s. � - d58--^--._ •�--'-- L w -1 0(^ :.r-'.IT F`I A . ..,J�1.7 • ~ ! �`'`� eNs eNalNeun Lxc •, , ` 1/I , , _"" : Q' i, -/' i' --�- .�-.-""' - nt1p//vw�h2cam ia 1 �w __ , • '.,,• _ I OP) maiDoxOn2can % • `' .-�� /•�• ` 455 _ / 11E4 . 1.000.7MA032 t S 1 S , ! &; . . c.c) ,i { / •\ -- ' 25555 -T�' / /l i w 4s L �� ILsatoxo0lrLee QJ J {j -A ® / \• \ 458 •,.,/• - 8 C 1 E E fi T$ 'gammon Crpm 1.:. • O ,' �j r- Ff� fa- CIA(43 % �''�, 6'«, Cr \• 460so9.ssarnx} �v�'7 '` 11 _ �v-?_ ( q /' 7T \• / DRAWING LS NOT TO SCALE ~ _ \� _ /.. /' ,\ \• .-. '• IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG 0 - I„ 2„ 1. WA NOTES v��''i� ,�, + -Q �F' - \ \�'� - PPE LENGTHS ARE MEASURED FROM FITTING CENTER LINES HORIZONTALLY,ADJUST LENGTHS AS NECESSARY FOR T T�r *C�IT�Y(�OaFnRENTUN ,• f'` ., ,23 a' \ 0 ``\.,, - /% '\ FIELD CONDITIONS.FITTING LOCATORS ARE MEASURED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CENTER LINES. ROLLING HII.LS Rr-�ISlt �, ^ ( i' STATION \ ,I ` ` CUT AND REMOVE ABANDONED WATER MAIN AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL PROPOSED WATER MAIN. `,M\, \ '•�'T \ ? EASING SAND PILE \ --�1 U \ 4 r;\ SEE RENTON STANDARD PLAN NOS.BR26 AND B-22 FOR THRUST BLOCKING DETAILS. .1:1'1I-4°T--� UTILITY PLAN 1 PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 1 SHACKLE RODS TO BE HIGH STRENGTH LOW ALLOY STEEL,ASTM A242,COR-TEN SUPERSTAR OR EQUAL,PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. Y to 11E HMV 7RtokD Mt !ME ROT worn 907 1"=20' - 161 nee Imo-n m m .17 ,.I oru I n I !..I , .„„ I &41ALYI I A,. I -- I •"_„ w0\ -' V {{ • 7,a7 - , .-/ .. .- ...:.-...,,,--,--.-- •- . • . .�t,.f .....:\-\ ::\:::,,,,,',:-., • , .,...,..„----- , 4gs- , _ . , ... \ 2\ , -..,,,,,,,,,,,,: / i �. % 45� u� j \ \� \ ; • • :\ \ asses--...._ 467-- i N '-, N, is• ` 45 • -- O • 10, I ----'-'"\\\'‘ \ ‘ \\ amikazior.:\ , , .. 59 \ ems \ f . \ ��. f//i.t / ,>�,0 // `. ,• � II ask 'Q III NIP \ ' 7 l� A',IPA A',' `\�t _ \ $ _ry i \ /i r - ' , '1' 460 .. ....,- .., ° / .-401.74a'--- ... • : n.„ . (g) --_ // ' .... .. . .\\ , ,. n 1,53- \ ,„ , -, 3F" t \'`‘''1\\\\: / i/ .,„. \\\\;-.\\\:'•\\' \ - • : \ */ .3 •l'a.44# 4/P.V j 1,; ,z...„ 0 1 ‘reljt ..\,*;' .1 I' ' ' f/(''''''' • \ .\\ \ \ , \"7 .\ ‘ % , . '''' ...,\\II': 6' 1441 -ri[ 7/f RESERRINLET SEE DWG N0.N52 \\�- 1 ._ . II f 2" -: . ,, ,, \\ , ILfll I • � . Ji ii ' N � g E I i i � v � ce I .. ......._ ..ti j.. .: - -'ice ��- ice'=i�'�,fib iliy •• ` - 1 1,i i 463 u N �., ,�.��.. 1�.!i.!i;;l=i� t1 I f I"3�131 ( 1 i K 1 `,1 ` RESERVOIR OVERFLOW/DRAIN 11.� i i-1 1 \{ i 11 j.. O,} ! e ��.• i ' 1.f .� PIPING,SEE DWG NO:iM51 I, „ N _` ! ! ! _ / 1 6 1 `,�J ''', — 5i I t' f ' i'''I.."'.. ) . r .tom' ♦ I ' \ t` `1 ` , �� , _ - ��, , O K' ,`\ `� RESERVOIR WALL / ' �^"-' • ,'.\ I 1, / .,A ,,. to,- 55 \ \ / • I SANITARY SEWER, ,��-•�` ••'.,'� ++ I ' S� , , I�� \\ `- _ 'i ••1 1 SEE DWG N0.C11 '� ,-'•`�.' 's t lbb i G `� I ., ,,,. ., I40 lnl _ �'�_ v �,® `_ V: ..y/ 9 — \`\ :,:\ !/�R. • I��V 'lit.Y Vi.�_� `�-n\ PP TT770 ELECTRICAL &TELEMETRY PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 2 STORM SEWER _20' PROPOSED LEGEND A.CENTER LINE OF 590 RESERVOIR POWER SERVICE CONDUIT TO BE ABANDONED AFTER PERMANENT SERVICE FROM PANEL"L" �`, ,MP STATION IS INSTALLED AND IS FULL'. 1.PIPE GALLERY FOOTING ORAN,4'PVC PIPE,SLOPE TO DETENTION POND AT 1.5%MINIMUM.DAYLIGHT 13.PIPE GALLERY FLOOR DRAIN DISCHARGE LINE APPROX.128 LF OF 4'ABS PIPE 0 2%SLOPE, TERMINATE AT DETENTION POND 0 IE=445.77',INSTALL A 4'NDS ABS BACKWATER VALVE TO OPERATIONAL. INTO POND AT LE=448.00' FENCING PREVENT BACKFLOW,SEE DWG NO.SO1 FOR CONTINUATION UNDERNEATH BOOSTER STATION .• B.CENTER LINE OF PRIMARY SERVICE FEEDER CONDUIT ROUTED BETWEEN THE TERMINATION BOX AND THE PROPOSED SERVICE TRANSFORMER.SEE ONE UNE DIAGRAM,DWG NO.E02 2.ROOF DRAIN DISCHARGE,4"PVC,DAYLIGHT TO POND. �••� FOR DESCRIPTION. I, 1 GRAVEL ROAD RH7 tNGINttPoNC,INC. i, DETENTION POND ratty://Innrh2.can .f��i '' 3.POND DISCHARGE,12'HDPE CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN AT I.E = 443.62'.SEE DWG N0. ' `` ma6)1) - V �;(:V�i C.CENTER LINE OF SECONDARY SERVICE FEEDER CONDUIT ROUTED BETWEEN THE SERVICE TRANSFORMER AND THE CT CAN. SEE ONE LINE DIAGRAM,DWG NO.ED2 FOR DESCRIPTION. I'CONTOUR CO8 FOR CONNECTION AT CONTROL MANHOLE I800� \ 5'CONTOUR D, CENTER LINE OF(I)1'PVC CONDUIT TO THE EXISTING 590 RESERVOIR ELECTRICAL PANEL REFER TO THE POWER PLAN,DWG NO E03 FOR CONDUCTOR DESCRIPTION. 494 ZONE WATER MAIN 4.STA.8+55.9,3627'RT.,OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE,SEE DING NO.COB FOR DETAILS. v1jfONdNb ` RESERVOIR RECIRWLATTON J j E.(I)2'PVC CONDUIT WITH ANTENNA CABLE TO RADIO ANTENNA MOUNTED ON 494 RESERVOIR.SEE SIGNAL AND ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN,DWG NO.EO4 FOR CONTINUATION 590 ZONE WATER MAIN 5.POND DRAIN,APPROX.35 lF OF 12'HOPE,SEE DWG Na COB FOR CONNECTION AT CONTROL YvtMA7CNt RICI INTO BOOSTER STATION MANHOLE AND DETAILS 509.663.0150 1 C c /� STORM/DRAIN PIPE `J\ — — — - SANITARY SEWER PIPE -r,v^(c'S NOT TO SCALE L�1 j F.EXISTING TERMINATION BOX FOR TERMINATION OF NEW SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED PUMP STATION. fi.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.20 LF OF 24'CMP. SLOPE TO POND NW IE=153.50',SE IE=453.30'. - _ ':,NOT 2'LONG 0•••••••••••••1" •�•�2" _ ELECTRICAL CONDUIT - "�"� • G STA 7441.89'R,PROPOSED LOCATION OF CENTER OF SERVICE 1RANSFORMER SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY PUGET POWER. SEE SERVICE AND METERING SECTION IN DIVISION 16 TELEMETRY CONDUIT 7.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.40 IF OF 24'CMP. SLOPE TO POND: NW IE=454.00',SE E=453.80'. • .• , Td OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. RESERVOIR FOOTING DRAIN CITYOF L.'. �I' '(`_ GENERAL NOTES: 8.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.20 LF OF 24'CMP. SLOPE TO POND: SW IE=454.0O',NE E=453,Nl0'. ROLLING HILLS RESER e,4 • n.„ W i ATION H.CENTER LINE OF(1)1'PVC CONDUIT TO THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR LIGHTING. REFER TO THE POWER PLAN,DWG NO. E03 FOR CONDUCTOR DESCRIPTION. SEE DWG NO.E51 FOR , DETAILS OF INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR UGHTING. �, 9.RESERVOIR FOOTING DRAIN,4'PVC,1%MINIMUM SLOPE,DAYLIGHT TO DITCH 5 PLACES. `1-� I. ELECTRICAL HANCHOE FOR LIGHT SERVICE(1YPICAL) VERIFY LO OF EXISTING URLI CO ARE APPRCONSTRUCTION. i Y UTILI I i P�N f. LOCATI LOCATIONS PRIOR TL CONSTRUCTION. 10.RESERVOIR PERIMETER DRAIN,4'PVC,1%MINIMUM SLOPE,DAYLIGHT TO DITCH 5 PLACES w:;''1,, J.PROPOSED POLE MOUNTED,150W HPS CUTOFF LIGHTING FIXTURE BALLASTED FOR 240 VAC, WITH ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION AND 4'SQUARE STEEL POLE,10 FEET TALL. SEE DWG NO.CO3 FOR THE PROPOSED WATER UTILITIES. 11.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.60 LF OF 12'CUP.SW IE=448.90',NE IE=449.50'. SEE DWG NO.CO3 1.1 DAY-BRITE ELM Y-BT15HSNT OR APPROVED EQUAL. BOTH POLE AND FIXTURE SHALL HAVE DARK ARCHITECTURAL BRONZE POLYESTER POWDER FINISH. PROVIDE 12"DIAMETER x 48" A 113. FILE MOW ac HOME NOT n' AIDDEEP CONCRETE BASE 1WTH INTEGRAL ANCHOR BOLTS AND CONDUIT. POLE BASE SHALL BE FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE AND LOCATED AT OUTSIDE EDGE OF PAVED PERIMETER ROAD. SEE DWG NO,COI FOR STATION BASELINE DEFINITION. 12.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.38 LF OF 12'CMP.SW E=449.OY,NE E=44862'. SEE DWG NO.CO3 194.06062 I RHBR-D43 I TNT'I I JAN 23,1998 I SHOWN I 20 I- C1X I 60r47 AIM LIGHT FIXTURE AT DISCHARGE PIPE. PROVIDE WEATHERPROOF LIGHT SWITCH ON POLE. • \\ ‘ / Oa \ �7,�Ri/ // LEGEND �,.2 / DOWNS __ _ [0011.5 C,MI.ORiWS 1R[.PPROD.X _ GEOVikr.WITS ARP:Loam.PROP 10 COwSRNCnW a♦ •4 -—— _— ` `\\\ // 1 SOT DRL x0 CO,rOR 511nM BAULK DCrwOW I V /' i t •.._� _._ - \\ � v \ / L. / 1 • L RD6011 'ilti j ` y [ (OW ONCE /II"... /f� 'a yf'' � .. _�8 \��. \ , : ursmc P1K[cxr �' _ - ,.J�.^„-:�_ • �/ ..:s mx e. , \Q` EPSWO.OM SRAw. d'♦ • '� � ' i' .�0.. ///-��'' ,:\ nuDm�� \'i'�/ —rr— [rsWc us lb .g; �-- s[Pa v „ \I� \ =a= n6Wcnl0,,,,a,. ' I400060 \ 4ERD POOR [46W0 ugEnrpprrp Porte !� 'I �`.` EASING OEPK10:[[Fero[ { A' _ -/ �u\'/Y \ \ ."/ ---— [RSWC[MDFRORURID'RENCK p ERM O S'COMM = ;� �' � � 511 \ / i I I II' I �"_1 PPaPocOrCOMM -.\ ✓• et.O11`'. �/ /� / WRE1 r'.a it 01LdLQr/91w / �� PROPOSED S'COMO / �, r/i .!5/41 7$ ♦. i 'UT'- __ \ ai 1I _ I II I II I.i,'.S PROPOSED O.ZOE TWO YAM s[I DPcar: COrtp•rOP'OEnYS .{„r,� " _�1 ' ( I \ J¼ '. t1' •y161 ,,,1 \,'. '' J . ,,\ --' . - --—— MOUSED SOD PK r .: • 1 -. a 111,1 g 1 PROPOD�� / ►e � ��. / ;�I-..__i ,�, '` I I, �� -—•—'—- rROPoYD rE� _ .,\:.'-'-. (_. , Q ; ;.• \ . �` $ y �\� a et . a 3 • - 1 PROPOSED Do..ROAD _• PR)PoEO fiRXlgx POW ♦ �' i� .i i ♦ t= •, �\. \\UPI{ •Gig', t .Q.. WO.WOO I \ II s � v r �. f��e,A. , �© �, '..ne a;koli s d ` ' _ _ —��----� Q�g�,• a I �°'� • \onaRW Ppo.sa DRC Ra. Q f 1 E1© C•J CCa[°°�s.Pu`. P ms ra x`.ur • 44 s / e.e e a e Oe a •. Q• �. • '' , �•` � ,c3=-•�3r 1 c P :,„/ , .,: .e‘,..:-.•-4e•= , e . /"., --,-;e----•-,- ' o " ......--.... { • //t• ogi .<>j?-.r°goo • . , ��. .e,t$ t ra ` \. ' • e.),"/ - _ -, / { ,: . ta'.e _e1 Qe ®Yi%t�'.. e7 / '`, �- / _ g g,° : G� ,r 7/ - t era .a a ep \ 'a. /' e ®Q %. / / 1 6\\ tj, °Qgi,t eo BOO Q' 6 " . 6 \\ ' ®e `ta g / e: • \ :I ' aa.wcDREws k. W.amemmlikee.MC 1 t RF • \ Rs ANNERR / 1 tsar. ,e ,i. ,; .ice i'. -- / �.�` L ac[ r• WIMP= OM= _,�,' •-- a c:q'©°. e.._ r. (�' - DR1•xC rs TOT to owE ' .�' ©��' s O :"0 D _ ° CITY OF RENT()_ �q ' j ®Q \./ ' -. ROLLING HILLS RESERYIDIRI STATION PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN PR0pC 5t3 DRALL SITE PLAN _ • _ — 1,4N, INPP-DP[ sew I No I/1x rr:ne 1 arwr I-Ins ' .•.r \ / GENERAL NOTES '�\� '� LEGEND Nalh I000TIr1 SIAM ARE MwaA.1.0 941[E H 11E C0x11.1C10N'S / / RN rfC W A\ IW.S._MS A / /J _ orsnme Yllh 10 KRM1 Re(1ME OOCAI SO AS 10 avO,p D.W WE OR / 1TUNC p�r�.l'f{ \\�i M�a ,,(1'��Sl ( / I —-- Illa[Mn IK PSIE•9.xR Mat 't .c \ .0 ..S•d All CMSIRYC1OI SIA IIC IS TE RCSPoA9bllh a THE Cax1R.C1OR —_ IA ' x s e 41, W`'4' �/ q l-a-Mr PxrzrRE ._. tr[t �- N_��r _+ r t\ ��- / 1 • IlaraElPll EXISTING KNOW J _ �.re, � " �J ti! ,/®t - 7, j1 ..i,• e •\\- d Q .,4' rusac awl TEES co POI bsnx• /'�(, - s \• 17:mr.e @Q.-.• ..-•, ' -e ®< y.111...r ..,\. \\\\ `0': tt ES6TR0 WAirLOGE MIN .♦ +,. .3" < •, `,-'I x, r re-. ,@ M, i \f1 ® E'6P1L LOGE MITES CLEARED ,/ ,• r_... n\/>' -— '` '6e -r '1 F .�. wv s-.,' ____IT — MING us Ct rx� // --—- '' �. -\ \e �A rt• It, � I - — EXISTING oceuo POW t rE� --.'/ ' \ (P, Q n6Mc uUUOPPMO PPER �,EExx /�0y� / .,..,\ \f <, / ..• \ I ` --- — EUSTx6 S'w0Atr SOOt '1.5 i�`'/r ,....\____, r \ \ `pyl��'r • \ — EVSMc os[auo MIAOW vv., ASO- +t./ apM--�-'_�.- I :IL.\ l' < _ - _! e ` I ��, —.— EASING DOOM RX'EPr�OF so- ey ta /. / - \s , .• ^® .o �e '41 , .. ; 11 ' '.AEA;�rs.e, - 4 �`i r i , s- Er- �61Mc IVIG s'�oxlioiE KC 'IJi e .... , n I4( '( _; .t,4P,,,S r ®f •\ \®< I / /1 ,`Y...„Q)�Jp"f'ke'te ls a .`-,„-JA iii I , ,S•. . J I i I •/�i(. 6d .�J'~J(J r -_� S. A r� .x a'ca` �' • // ' ✓© ffi: II* ti t ® � . J 1 '- ?' <, y td � �, 3 I ♦ warm a It 9[6 xfa lr Kaurzo Ida !- e 1 'Y / / •r `• \-"a @ a t IREES AIS BRIPAI Par AM rN a rum 1 x /.. - - - Q / @r r 1 �- - �. E?' e.�' • \r ,f T•C N>•RT wx[rzR a e'AND cu. ARE sAax. r t,` / @ry. q,e,,r1.♦+ Rs '._,"�r ' ® \ 1©` .e- .. 0 rot. 1 M�ry,Ws -_ .r'�„ , 0/ ,.r ' R( {� �< '(• " °�. <@c�(Q r �`'� STATION BASELINE DEFlNITION < 4• f� - tir lit �~ c' ' ��"�6 ��;r t J : ©+`... :- t" t ,.E\. .;\ ere.---�r • af�m®r ®<` +d r d 0' Feu uEs�eo a KCMG rams 7 • 4t .t, @,4(\ t' \ ~ri( ,�y �• J' e � ' I eEwrwc a slang BASELINE naxl,o' 19rre N' ',s. t. . I '®e �s '` ♦ e Se s J, r' ,t' c S1/41/4, a DAD a SIAM.e3AOIE vuan• ,mxau' .x.,R r 'r r ri` ( a y J .r 4 1\ ry •- zsor s.nxwst 6 \ C. + e' V .� ff 2 ISO Cr xaaroa of / �,! ....... (P 1 ° \ Mu OW •/ ' �- a , . ,�' m-pi' • . , filar e:. r as a SURVEY CONTROL DEFINITION / �'/ , e A Et" < e<, •t `tr — - tjr \ 1 / i 1 �,,w` cvu ammo c Eefnw ultra, @r / e "e' �9+; q( s 1,- • \ ✓ _ _ ,.tic' \-1-a I r wwscr cMmx earl meo ss' rxinrr ar r> �Tr trte,e'�,q 4�.r 1 r ` • J i r s ra /rrCY © vAVE xusm vosl men, rws,ro.e' / /// ,.•4 �` I tr • - (� i — i q'i ( ir. t o _ < 'G ti(e yy�s b (. Qr r`,:1: r i I " s ! ' .. ./ v. % , r ,t/.•ra-Qr Q w,raA[xr rnn.+aT ,mvox of .a,ri / ♦ '/ ,/ • a Ea r [C ® e > ,• _ fa,4' < ' •3� © wow,COINER Inw fT „aen SA /�// /, < rT.�.r <'0'- i ,g(1©}ice ®q-.2. - ••q y \ . \, ` t l ..�,',, �/.,,�— ed e`g© v Qe wacnn CroxER IMP.. Iwsnz. / /i�\ 3'-,6.' JT��{rr��?,' �eI 4.t<. t!'� r7�(�_r`\'.. 1:ca% 38 ^e' q a m,,le1/47, /! a.y�a'.nu 0 worrnn CEww IMO If ,1Wg6N' / 4 / �i't\1{ 8LE:� + 4 1-:.j�r 1 s rY �py�f, ' ^e �P ,\_ate 1 /® 'T`,, \ ',t �<V'-Yl ' My g gal.2 / 1 w�'N': `• t c"�.( Iafe911E ,R � K, \Yf �r .�_ r\ e.,,\ \ \ /, prw" �.:4s •1 it am, wei r r . _: ® e, `, -_V ;t I • / Aa 1 ..4 + 1 a-. t- -, r', i' i --�. .O _`•�?yI 0.— b,,,, a@r - �0j �•v,l" E'si .. -®,.-+ t * rtc x,. ac,c�,.a,a wM'wro..v M0 - .— — l -/�t"J'il' J @Y ,( \\-.-. - _. r OIfAAG 6 POI TO SCALE -.u'N ,f Jy� .y C! r, e. - e _�u',L} r ew 6 xo1 r Eac o" . vx O _y. 'A �"� c. (� 't 1; t�' ` ; �A® ROLLING HILIS RESERX�r R STATION / .� �r'N'\•\' '�}'�. • / © r �L. /..Q t�17:1;. �. 1. �� `1�� EXISTING SITE PLAN EXI Ili1�OVERAL L SITE PLAN r.sa Iw-0a:1•ew-ow �'w ss 1116 I o o ,so,co I z-, ..D A.. WEST EAST / C.S66 RGSERWN 510 505 w< PROPOSED RL4R1gR 500 s L _ 495 490 455 PU[RP...4 \ 480 //PRCPoGfD SVDSRR r7 l RN SIRT - 450 - 445 440 ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH NORTH SOUTH • 510 -- 505 S00 r PROGC3'➢R(MRWR l- 495 490 485 480 Mr{ IR _ r _ !♦!y!9 y 4 a� I, — D. °°as`R,IeR rt. _' L� t a ai P l7 `sk.ir {. � 470 1 I • 4f 60 • 455 om wNcs m _�—r I I 450 445 440 —__— _..- i ELEVATION LOOKING EAST D .p.ww.w..s D I10*V/, .ORM= "10PL,AIHH[PR IC, I R T s wwgl.y...t. ONRww 6 NOT ID SCALE 6,,,,: 4-.:�/] if MP IS NOTY LONG. I- 'Z. CITY OF HI RFNTON` ROLLING RILLS RFSEitXAIIt STATION '\ " S -my SS-SECTIONS 19A C62 D:l 5144-DI3(scll TT.I aw ti.698 I saw I m I ca I I:.a - _ LEGEND C I 1 1 —— —— USN. • ' sy 4. -/ /,-/ ,1.�� i„__ `` fir., \w\- ..7. min[r . KERN. IV a /' Y .fir �(:3' "" �`.. �\ arws oYow faronn CANER / • j \ • • t EKING a!w _,< / KmtS GE - { 1 / s. pima ' �/ >) WR ,-Q Q / y \\ • \ • sw Una rK[s qk 46. Evsma CRASS uE. r,P � Yi %:/�� caxsnwclrol Ywnc xo-GRASS AKA FOR � eta! -. _� \ / \ « t ' wrtRNL smug / O kt _.f A / •' \//� • "' fgS,N4,'CON. : _. �^,. / - ` \ a '// \ ._ .- ltlSrMt 5'ComUt _ - -.Y'' \ ,I/� \\ .�.1/ ��- � COK1MKllai I'CENT. #4 .. \/1/;;•;.,.• _ .t0_ 4 SE>IA RTMLS \ PFOVYp KSERwR R[tNa..AlNll PA4 / �i J \ \I,"‘ `� 1 i I YROPDSF➢SmaY/gwa RR 4./ ' \\ s PROPOSED fm1NG MAN.vE - ": E•••NW . MAO=cisE _c.. (/* '. • . ;' 'I W — — w+avosm mEvwrt //�A a% RE3ERlr ' ; r00MG AK MUTER \\` ` e PROPOSED Ert39ai CORTROA FIR. / .::L•• • 1K iris • % �• gANS SEF Oro NO cla rq I ....e........A.A....r...• PRaPOSEO SmAR I arA.s , { I KE BAKER • i . ,11 x C I \ . • • -_ O • S I� �1 / I PRaos[n wrrr cgK,ucE o-,a AN SS!; '1 Sr!.ttBs Lnrz\. �, V' I • ,^•'•� �• ^ • � { t t t t i t + I _ — — — PROPOSED DOKINKnq \ I:. 1 w3 D USER %rl' \ \"°• �o\~ �� `5 ,' { I GENERAL NOTES ' \�•, \ ," 3 ` _ _ // ~' Asslb I7.".� 5 nnnn4 unm(a.mn earl AK.PPRa.r.rt.IT VAN r RN •• ' `s0 ` //: , sJ a OR RABAKE ``• iii: M -- ,` \`\ w � \ "e_• { KE.UVARD YARRYL SMALL Nq OE USED AS rRga q NERO.BAC.I :.0 J tp N.l,q 10 R[slq(All pSDABED RR[RS m EC51NG q KM CapDM. W WTI RIO:EATON AND �8 1 \ M1 :\ • % ------ If40.E4UR[P4D41 SK Dub.Kr fiEAKDER m REDUCE[ROAN AK !♦R /�'' t111'` 4y1 9f,[µNY9S YO SW%E Q Ml V4P1LL Wl[IYn fq pfy[[R\ \G, . MEW Sao PR[ OO 3 yy�� KPRDRN.\\ / E . I mNWKIa)SW(mr6RUCr DC 0601KN Pao rNsr m RIME A .rs..L� \ /�t!�} (Sjs•�'- SEDN[N.P.D/TRAP FOR Onc,SR gADNG rRA OP LULL PEN OS µ % Q W \\ - ' !] .•y: 1— y S� ' '^' Sef` ra1D/NA➢.M�.00LSO4 PAI[PLVrq a1afS camccrm 9W1 9HY1 W e"'" 1 <L 111...vvvrrr SEDMw nµ 70[WKS RR WVDYK MOD To 016/66166 ((!!�� Ey !A�(�� C, VJ [!3 z • '(t�. F`3 Gj lCry,SiJ W Qi m MOl Woo TAT BAY • •r �Q fl\% I am nw a.r was SHOO mua uR[�ss anw.ELo TO a K4 /'/ I. I to*r' wr<. O. • • caamacr A ACV.NO. I _ b. Ca6RNlm3 DRMRIIC.AS aCc1 It IC / / c N... _ YS D.Pr Ca,SDM1ACDM n E E n e rE�` ,-140 ? I siAUNc AND RAW/ att Hama CaNstrKrol NSREtrce (�t�'�3 C:7�tT C st0,'.a.a[.r KtaO I d'71`'. ` r%, E ,//- "" .i F r s NMAT011.rd t 9rFY ` y 0 PROPOSED @090N lMNa V • r47 "'(1 S �IIj I 151+'�r AS) }}+- MAm*3 03 IENEN5 Y[a�.a ON I 'tT r .S 0. R // A• I waft; R DOT}i'DLai o � r , ' I� {`. • 3r �J // CM OF RENTO ,'•' L e ROLLING HILLS RESEIty STATION , . . ©r.5 / a C UC11bN GRADING CONSTRUCTION GRADING&TESC PLAN D TESC PLAN 30 ,l Ott I Ara--ou(sat 1 .YN:5 1996[ 97.1 1 so[tas I ,•r • . .. • . . / PROPOSED LEGEND - _ 494 IONE PATER NAA .... ..•- RESORWIR RECPCUUTION .., ..70...,.„. . .."'''''' ,7 ' - DETENDoN pow . .. .... 59020K PATER muN STOW/DRAIN PPE .. -- .. --....:'-.-----' ---_______ 1'CONTOUR ----- SMEARY SERER PPE 7,,,,'GEKRAL NOTES. Z. ,''.•(:•' .• . . a,' ' '''' -: - 4 • . - - - _._ - Teton,'MORT LOCATOIS 6 EXISTING MOTES ARE APPROXNATE. WIDEN IOCATICNS maoR TO ODISTRUCTION. ' .";."-....., .... . ....--,.. / ' N • •. _ .. _. . SEE MONO,CIO FOR STORM SERER,SANITARY „„.._. , ., .. •71""'".. . -- - / Ekb PIPE AND FITTING LEGENDS _ SERER.ELECTRICAL MD MEMORY PROPOSED --.-._ ,.. ... - / „. 1.STA.72.5.17.6'L PROADE 27.STA 6+894.1119 R.RONDE / •• (1)-CONNECTA TO EXISTING VALVE,PRONDE ranws ro-16'D CENCI Mil 22.0.NEW AWAIT NEN SZE DAG MO.COI CDR suncTiBAST.L91 mnonot 4" ,/• • .." -... .._,,_/,.. .. ___./ 0 .• AS NECESSARY.REAM VALK mARKER POST MD DRAT MUST&COI - __.-,..„. ." --' ,,-- •• '''... ILOCKNG,SALYACE OORKER PoST PA et MOS To BE FU.191 MA FTIRAIED-GRAZI.',./ ',../ ../. 19 II 29.STA.89.4.126.7 R.FROVCIE• 3.STA 3+65.2,174'I.PROADE. (1)-1CD MACAW VERT 2202•BEND(MAW)WA , . / Ca';': / .- 0 ,.'... -;/- ---,..,? '.':...4/' S / ' - ilir Z ' '.:':... ...-- , /' 6) /'.' / ,lek ,... . -' \ . .. , ....'. i , „..... I 1 • .• / --e?-,/' 4,4 ON. --;•1. - ___ 0)-16'D 96"BEND(1.0)IND4 DRUST BLOM ,...e ,.)ST.A.,551,5.1it1f6.9"R),FRONDE .'-. (1)-16'D ADAPTER AAR) () ) '4 e ,. / (;):::.:az.,,,uF=MUST El001 AIRUST BIM 32.STA 7425.1,147.6.R,PRONOE: f. (1)-C DI 90'BEN)(MAW)INN DRUST BLOCK t,3i!T....70:2,76.64f R,P,P>1%ftE.0s.,. ,, • / /V 7.'' '4)..-......' / . - - 6.STA 4+352.126.9'R.PROADE 51.STA.7469.3,136.6'R.FRONDE i ' / • .7 ,7' '' .,..., \ N. e ..\:\-\_..,, ii;Ap,". 2'RR RELEASE 6 VAGLAN YAK ASSEMBLY, AMU PER RENTOI STANDARD PON BRA (1)-16"D orr BEND(NAIAD MTH PROST&OA N --, < 53.STA.7+603.105.7 R,PROVIDE . / ..:%.;;.•''. IL SEA.4+615.26.6 R,FRONDE. (I)-16'D Er BEND(14.41,1)VAN THRUST BLOCK - , ( 1)-IC D 2210'•KW(NAND NA TRUST&OCR _ -/ - '•' ''''',';''' ..,..- . V,91. . 452P .., 55.STA.5+761,105.7'R.MONDE '/. • - . ' • ...... ' .5.106.7 R.PROADE. 0)-16'x 6'D TEE(MAW MN DAUS"BLOCK C:1/ 458 _ •". . . - ...-„T 6 4‘ gi rir%2722,,f moo 0,...00 Te114 ARISTA= (1)-6.01 GATE VALVE(R.N.)_ -- ._.-- (1)-6'EP PPE LENGTH TOM- - . ‘, . \,t., , . • . ....,_ .,,,,,1,V, 12.VA 5+894,1007 R.PRONDE (1)-FRE NYORANT ASSDELY.INSTALL PER RENTON -,4 '' ,.... • . FOR CONIECTION's 0)-w D TEE(..1) STANDARD PLAN DR24•100'RT 44*" .... ,, • ---._ ..., - _ (1)-16'CIDATE YAW(FLAW ' N\...'''' /''''-•7 -NN, ,'1411101111 ..11F1- . 0 ' - \I 0)_16'PAPE,.461A TOM 57.51A...432105TR.PRONOE: -- / - --,g;Y', ,...,. ' ./';/ 'tY.‘.;)‘'.'.-/ '..... Or It STA.6+54.6.108.7'R,PRONE( D TEE(FUEL)WM RADS"AOC. (2)-16'PGA,'4411E(PUNA / / •.4'''",..01-1;;;:"'-.4k • ..........., .....-- ,,,_II T 6"D TIM(MAO)NEN TROST RON (1)-r ot WI VASE(FLA0 (I)-12 D GAM VALK(RJ) /.•,,,,.,'"/.....-.. -16- NRI,ZF ''' '-......... 460 -7.,"--. - . . ',,,, ii 41101111111111mr, NIN: C3471; ' 0)-116?141TAPAT A:61TRaRY'.INSTALL PER RENTON 19).-71'1).5[1132.2941E'N.Dk(16.4.1)MTN ARUST RD. /V i'''''' . , , ifr,,, „...„...0111117,41zARREA, 0....„..i'...„.._11., ,(S:TiANDA71:11.,..PIA,2,:•19;..24,110;...11,,,5',7RT,1 . 62.SEA.6,46.1231'R.FRONDE - yi - . . /AX/ /• s. (t)-16'D 2210.REND(NAND MTN TRW F600, .../, ' 64.SEA 4+660.123.1'R.FRONDE. / ,e,,,,,,*/ je,-.„ •:„.",,,,.;',:',2,,//../ , ' ..."..,, /,' , 4:tA,4 /7 / ',/,',/i_1•Y/ ' /' . •.„ 46? ._. -1. itifryV,/: ,...1111141111114tt 20.STA 7+14.3,139.3'R.PROACC. (1)-12".16'DI GROSSO...A) (2)-,r a ME.LENGDI TONT (2)-12'D=RING 0)-16'D PLUG WTI DRUST BLO6 0, 0.. '',,,:',.!.%.; l .1 • , ilItY,i _...- __• .. T5, 4tt, \...7 g))--.16:U.nrEENIVIL0 66.STA 5.20 372./.RONDE • - .1/. fr,..4 11"1(.r--7 '4"%''' N. ...\ 22.STA 7+143,MO'R,FRONDE BLOCK . ( 1)-16'D lEE(FLFAA DA STA.429,.4'L PROW( 707STAk5742.6.98.7L PRONDE \' I I Vt2;4110::E7:1*(LAA79%MUST BLODI (I)-12'D 1EE(ELAM / 6P. .". •. .. ... • ? / RESERVOR OUTLET. \ RESERVOIR INLET, XENON°M52 , (2)-12'D CATE VALK(FLMAJ) (2)-12'D PIPE LENOIR TOOT / ,'... P ./,/;,/ ' .. ,i ; • i __ .•••- , \ • I /} (2)-12'C.COUPLING 1 ! 23 APPROX 17 IF 5116'PRES 56.APPROX 351f of 16'D PIPE 1 1\ 41 % • al ® . . ." .. •....'"41:1...:,41t4 :ANROX'*"11445LIF"o;'16.!•DIMKPIPE 25.,PPROP 311f NIS'EA PPE 58 APPROY 13 If of 16'DI APE V., 4, . .. ..f4 ,P ', \ -•-...-' .,.1 , '' 463 ., Rest.,,,c.0,,,,R,,,,,,w.' „,.. 111111ML:311t, ,a.0.,49/...4, ,iip '4' ; ''.61, ;\ .1 / 7-- ike . ._ - , . PIPING.SEE EIRSIK/A51 : 7,AMOY 98 IF of 16 D PPE 26./19%1(46VA 16 D PPE 61.APPROX 456016 OINK .4" V 4... .-. . '• 1 , 9.PAM%47 IF of 16'DI PIK 28,APPROX 13 If of 16'DOAK 63.APFIROM 16 LF of 16'DIM ',/./. 4 y . 4,-N ,• , '‘o - 0 , , II APPROY 616 of 16'D VE 30 APPROY 10 LF 4116'DI PPE 65.IRMO%143 LF of 12'DI PPE ," ' , 1.3.APPEND 65 LF of IC D PRE 31.APPROY 1351f of 4'DIVE 67.AMOR 10 LF 9112'D PPE /, . /i 4 / : , %4A6% , A. \ 6 , \ \ , . .. 1------._ ,5 APPROX 7 Vol IT.a PK 34 WPM 11IF of 4'D PIPE 69 APPROA Satre(If DIVE '.,,,\ \\ . .' ' . 19.AMOY 19 LF of 16'DI PIPE 52 APPROY 3D V of 16'D APE . . ‘ s'‘... 21 AMOR 74 LF el 16'DI PPE 54 APPROX 191 LF of le DI PPE • / Cl e , ." * 40. , ... ._ ,; . - 17,4 iii hilto IWO 710= • A. , : ! '.....;.;/ : • LA r ' • ...." •NGINILIRs ........ .\ ' .. PLANNER, • ' A. A". 456 scliiiii111,6 .1dATOSAV 0,11. " /• st .\ - .. , ./.."- .....,.... .... • -... ,.."..c - -:1 W:ATE14-10TES - BRAME IS NOT 70 SONE kommenzizzi , ..., FBARISNOTYLENG, ‘ • • \ /) I CITY OF RENTON: ,, • , -, • - PPE awns ARE NEASURED TAW PIM CENTER INES HORIZONTALLY.ROAST LENGTHS AS NECEWRY FOR ...it \ \ \ 'g \ V , ' '• •, V ,/ \ REID COND111616.IITTINGICCADONS ARE ICASURED AT 1190 mown.OF CENTER LKS. EVE MO ROAM ABAND6ED RATER 11001 AS NECESSARY TO NSTALL PROPOSED INATER MAN ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR 44 0-4TATION ,., \ EASING SAND PILE " ak, : SFIRENTEN SEAWARD PLAN NOS 6926 AND 13-22 FOR TWIST BLOCKRIG DUNES pft ork&6 UTILITY PLAN 1 PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 1 SMACAELE RODS TO BE MGR SIRDIGIN LON ALLOY S1EEL ASTM A242.606-116 SUPERSTAR OR MEAL PER OT OF RENTON SEAWARDS AM. NI Dam FAO IMI KAI AA Oa IA Sop I.•rY 194.062 IN04-D101 SO11 AP I AN 23 19981 SNOW 1201 CO3 I 5-47 > /z %_ ` — . t,7,.. .,, 's., _ ' ._. ... •,,ys s,\ \' SR, \ ...,\\\ ‘T,,,,,,N,''',. ' / / / F/ /,JA- \ -Y�5'J\_-� 1.t.f tiu' Te'i \ 1. \ \ �� \ cI • , \ -44,1° . . ..„.. 4'6--------' \N 45g • r j 49 "//; '\;,,,, ,\,,,,,, . � 59 - 5•�.f. \ `�l ,•FC ,// �� . _-- '- /� / �i ay��_� ,I ° 4. -.Jn a�o \\ n „d000lgliili 113 .7. .11'iii." 400 0)' '-•• . in.:, I 3 8 • i 467 �,i e4iii I aiW�- it , r E ,ITT� SEE DIE NO.1152, ' / RESERVJIR INLET.— \,� I I I W '' • �/ / .7. SEE D.N0. 52 I ` i ,I F(1' 463 IIi01J\ ➢1PW eo.iij a�.� ih:• `. iJ J 7I. - .ni-', /r: " ' II 1 r I t�\ , j RESERVOR OVERFLOR/DRAM `l _ — r 4-\ �I T ,� ;co 1 L PpING,SEE DC xQ,YSI _ , f I.� 4 I -=a 1�; s' • \\`, KSRYdR wz \ 4$5 11 ,1,I\ o� / i ��►,R _ _ TT 1I \ /I \ , / _. \ . I I 6ANITARY PIER. .\ �J P�• ALs' I I 1® �� .. yr YF CM xO tit 1 , • ' / \ / I i ELECTRICAL&TELEMETRY PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 2 STORM SEWER A CUTER LYE 0 590 RSERvgR POKY SLIME COND.TO 8[ABAxDd4D PIER P.A.,SEANCE TROY PANEL n PULP SlATd1 5 M514C0 AND 5 ITAly PROPOSED LEGEND I.PIPE O AT L.-14 GRAN,t'PVC PPE POPE TO OE1EI1110N POD AT 1.55 PM.OA1LOIT 13 PPE E AT DE POW GRAM M.A.E-4.LME A MEAL 126 O O A•ABS PPE R A SLOE OPERATOI4. C10 POLL)AT IL.AILW' TE11091 0 gTEN OE DIG P E.OR CON WATIO A i 12(A15 0(5134 S1 VALE To B.COPY Oa O P urRV spoof FEEDER MOOT ROUTED KTREEN PIE 1EMMU5ON BOX AND THE PROP0SED SCRNS TRAN<jWKR.SEE Of 1411E DRAG..D.N0.E02 iC11C1MG PRMxT BACNRON 4I DIG N0.WI FOR COITN1AlIDN I1IEERX[A1N BOOSTER STAnOT1 FOP CSLPPTW. I _ I WANT ROW 2 POOL DRAMdSOFAAGE A'PVC,MYIlb1T TO TON. YIv O.COLT. POND pc ].POP(SCx0RGE It POE,O.PAIS4 N ETT6TxG Gtd BASIN AT IL-14162.SEE OK M]. JI-, um""Fim, C.CORER LNE 0 YCOxDARV YRNq REDEP CW WIL RNIFD OPEN TIE ffRNq mAN4WYCA AND TIE Cl CAN.ki ONE LFiE dAFRAY,O'AG NO CO2[CR gSCApTOx �`1 I.COFIO.R CEP lO COMECDOCRAR NM AL O,CORRECT RECOIL 080 2 D camp cat 0(1)1 PK COOP TO PE EASING 590 REFER,.CLCCIRICPO.PLAY.PANEL REFER 10 PE PO .D.N0 E03 FOR COOJCIOR MOO. �� A R ' 9A ,0E RATE YAC E$IA.1.55.9.3,327"Ri.,ON1ELdl/L1RIM0 YA1C0.E SE[DRG NO 0R RR OVALS E(1)2.PE COP.RRI ANIMA CABLE TO RAOO AVOWYD..PD CA 99A RESER.OR.SEE WALL A.EOEC'S//CA,CR../RAN.0RO NO.EDA FOR COITPJATOR REYRWR RECPOILAIM]N 7 Gasp. WO BOOSTER STARON. 590 4/ RATER lop MUD WON,1*544 35 LLW tY APE.SEE 011D N0.cos RR COxrREC1F1x AT fYNTE1L 1 AY STOW/DR.PYE YNCgE Mel DEEPSfPL F.EASING PRNRATO1 B0.(R TIONNAPO.Cr PER SERNO TO THE PROPOSED PIMP 51APON. ————— SWTARY SETTER PPE 6.SmNY DILNRT,APPRD5 9011 O'21'O.4WC To POl0:ER E•4518 SE E:15I.9I'. DRAPING 5 NOT TO SCALE G STA 1.AI.B9'R,PROPOSED LOGIOI 0 CENTER orY5N0 1RAN4OMR 9NR4E0 APO/GOURD BY POET P0FE1 SEE9.RNq MDCr9114.YC1M N WS.16 MELEORGALI.C ,1 I(BM IS ROT 2.LONG 0 I" 2' OE RE SPECNIGTONS dEMY gYQAI T.STERN CLIME,APP.b V CrIf OP.90R TO OP MR E•AN.DD.SE[-MSC /+E�{/ ENTO MEMOIR FOOTxG DRAM CITY OF REAL 1 VN // N.comp LYE O(1)I.PAC COGRT 10 TIE PROPOSED ENTRIOR W11CL. IE(ER To PE POER PLAN,DAC 80 E05 FOR COMI1C1O1 0ESCEPT0N. SC DRG no.E5T fW E STERN OFLNAT,APPPoL 20 V W](Op.SLOE 101410:SR E-NSFOp',ME E-W.BR. T i i HILLS �Y*E. (��p p�.��.y}��:y� f DUALS O Pat.MP EYIEPOR LINO. GENERA.FOPS ROLLING HILL,)RESERY ODMF STATION 9.RESERVOIR MOTNG DWI,P P.,19 DIMPLY SEW[D.ANgIT ro DIM 5 PLACES L ELEC...085010E FOR LENT SONS(TPIC4) LOCATIONS OrFRSIING BTLIIES AE AIMPVOAYAIE, 1,w Off' VERY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSRUCTON. 10.F03RHEx PERREIER CRAM,1'PVC,Tx YMYW SIPE OAMOO TO 01 5 PACES LiTIUTY PLAN 2 J PROPOSED POE WINTER 150R IePS COROT WRNO MOM BALLASTED FOR 240 VAC,IMP ASWYEIRIC OSTAIDITO. t•SOBARE WEL POLL 10 FEET TALL SEE DRS W.CC]FOR PE PROPOSED RATER BRUTES. II.S1DRY OLVERT,AP.SO LF 0 OP,A E•W 12.O90'.NE E•H9.50'. SCE OM PO OW [FUN!�•�•GV DAV-BIER RN V-8119.1 OPAPPRO.MAL BON POLE AND ENTIRE WALL NAVE DABS ARORITCTURAL BRONZE Fy141ESPA POWER P115N. PROVIDE IY P..,Mr DEW COICE1 BASE RUN RIPCFN AK.SOTS ANC COW? POE BAY SHALL BE P.TO PN15N CRADE AND LOC..Al OJ15C CDC O RA.POWER ROAD. SC ORC Nd OCR FOR STATOI BASELME OEINPOI. I2 SPRY O4NR1,APTOE 3D 0 Cr 1Y CUP.Sr E•M9.00,NE E-1196Y. SCE OK Y0.OC3 19PD62 MRB-043 j T.[TW j JAN 21 199R SIIDRII 120 r CO I 6.87 W Ma FI[TUE AL OSCPARGE PPE. PR°.KANE-PK:00F Loa SRTO1 CN POIF. / G • Z '. / /.- , / _JN� _ „ e -�I LEGEND / x �1SS M0.WML PY ./!c^^S t / w- r� y25 - �9 a� .. —vi- —Ssx-a _ 1 u — Eunosslrnlcc orcRraCx lQ -- — RIGHT-a{r EPS1ML P,RY x,ENE1FA(F YD B1 SEE / / "'�-, `/ ' / / ater A� - 71' 3P 050 ��( CENRAE 1 n)ML P,vESx1/ $PfC9UDONS FOR SEED YL ' " •• NMWEN, a * CE VHS D D x01 DISTURB • PROPERTY CORNER/ t - / �. % ! $. . e .\•G/, ' Euslxc m,rE c sc / ,y9j _. , .az .�. _ -_.. EMSnNL GS ' '�N //A `w _ ga_ O \�..' CY,� �� 1MQ (MONO RTK ° a /�tC�f�� 01. E,SnxL R1EM POKR / - W� / _ OR.E10.[L9 jt,�,/ (( -- E,5nN4 ULERCAgND vpEA . / �� V E[51ML S,x1,Rr SEYA / / / "!C- r- \ '!.. {e•` S, , E455NL ST.%KP ' / / _ / {Q_�!� .�, E,RnE1C OUMRCRpNO RIEPNONE '_\ /' \. �/ �.y / `\� CU8 fOR CE)MS 0831f042331.SEE NO x0. . 9 EMOOL MeV Nola �uS 7 '/../. .(6--,/ ---- /c. . -,,f,e,/,'‘ ,....._..., ^' - - _ _ ._ - r — PROPOSED s=POUR a a9 Pq b. Ma / PROPOSED 5:9iMY7 5 IORY/PREIN PPE • • } i.. Ys �y F`0 / PROPOSED ORAVEIED AREAS ' `. .' �_ p' - — — PROPOSED CMSJRIIC110M Wi5 • j FENCE CONTROL POINTS y+-"-r5� 1__ \ Mil Boenmc Saki Sena r A4/ 0/ / 3 / E•E xroR,xr(m) _ -- /x �' �, �Y > \y i , Irm9z,t 13m2sin FENCE COINER Q ` •\ / /f> / q _ -N./ -/ / ._ne b \ 'i 2 17299191 1335.xim FENCE ewm ) 3 lraure 13mu9CO FDIC/OMER G { '�+0 / "` / * \ .�L , n3m53s 1m�9am {Doff a GMT .j/ f/ Y -7,, , it // , // 1 5 17]BR01 130550436 FENCE CpMER p6 ! 1 1 \ \ • 6 1730n3) 13msxi.6 ft.EC.. / ' !. / � ��, M.T.to BE 9914m LY, •f J / J 173045.91 130556187 FENCE"PREP �'LR�' / 6 17302735 13055444 PENCE CpMER /r/ % / •• / SE l ] {R/,VEL,1Cg55 R06p.5[C \ 9 17301724 130555370 EIKE CORNER / / / !ES' / NG N0.Cm FOR PE NLS _t /' / -�' TY / / \/ O }1 J l.0or I 1 -0 IYE 10 1)300862 IX✓A51.63 MICE TOWN / '' 7 ' } 1 P . 11 1729M.Y IJOSSm), 1ENCC CORNED �/' / ] f J ; P — '-- 11 • �•�.� � a 13 1)115).N 1305566.T RxU CLBNCP / 1 13 172)26.17 t3055D.21 FENC[CORNER a / '-r � / ''4. J�. I ,( 1. 172726.17 1..17 FENCE CwNEP 7=-___ __ - -_-- wwR.9,u5 ac`1u EOM ! 15 m75J.34 13rox22. EMI EwN, _0 ' `. �;57. TO vmor/,Rw,9-Ix6,lY /, a 1nTM.65 02 5336.02 FENCE CCRNCP. O Io¢a 9F¢.9YC91 Pa{06ao1 DEP. ,. .. i - n 1727a.16 1305.316.33 xwE a GAR ,,,,,/, a ;„.- N , , , L ..,, ., /\ m �\ M /. 1E/ A'\, ID . , j • Lw //Y / /` 6\ , y L, - -/�\,-� I,44 e■R i , ,. 1 11R. fv 425.4914. i L^^. p; Ix i C l T{ {��(Q� y1 .. �}S`w`�1,'j� / _ \ enizod f �� '///f/ \� _ pf9NMG 6 MOT)0 SCALEizsg 1YseYane ,c Vl 1 ` .. ' ® BU SS q 223 SEE - • R BM 15 MOT 2-LOW 0 ,• 2- A131.1 j \�+l•! DIG ND.cm Pa anus ® \ CITY OF RENTON \ ROLLING HILLS RESERyDIR/ r`. STATION ~ " �,Y `F� PROPO n E<ANI5 LANDSCAPING E"gc3979s.132 R EDsnNc wn PIE ', E! \ PLAN 1 '? PROPOSED SITE PLAN dj5` 3 -- '� , ac,. n„.3 o.c w®RP 0E03s . ?C'V3 •-20' _ .-. -"\ I Iw.o62 I RxBR-DIN!YN IW 1.MN 23.1999 1 91o1w 1 20 I I 9�.7 HMM05(E0 00 NOES I APPLY)(Wm 9F0 MT AS MEWED BY NE 01C COONS 9IRFACE WATER(890 YAN04.AT 120 POUTS PER ACRE FERTILIZE AREAS 0AERFL0 GRATE SSE *13 10 SEER.AS REQIRED. 2 ASmS R PDO SMALL BE E51AR19E OrR 0 FM A ARM. arc soon PlaoR 10 0 0 0ARW Amy G r WATER FROM TIE DETAIL THIS SNIT y AC r 1M aENEM GRP.P S1A1V4 POO IfPOO /a1ALRT MALLS s Epp _//'�Illl'1`, m,/ ;': • 456 50 0 CONRMM SN0 YA9TA1 ALL x'NROSEIND ACPES AS NECESSARY/ARV 0E C001RACl 4O MRRwtt RRICO ANY MARES OR ♦ 6.36.W - �' •OTHER EONS W ERO9 N 9YLL BE PRMIPAY WAR)•AO RESIDED. • �� • Too-� C0051RuOT EOM/Roo NAIM �I.: 6.L4Rxc IEFAL COYPACITO TO 908 LQO :MC r.0.09D GAGE 9N'P0R1 BRA'En fxAL GRADE wCNORED D.C00CRCh WALLY 6'O.C. 45]3D• C J-� ERSiNG MOM 9NEACE 3 ] - 1i ._.-. t • . __- I�� r ,, F'�� R" • [ 1 PamRroYLL [xclv9iulm _ _- -_. ._-- # h y5t 'E ,24pAt i44. ep 'E`'t,�r CERRO BARREN SEE NwxaE STEP.x PsuLTALE PER • F v,✓�_ 5 STANDARD MN B01J FOR N0.O9ID EN1RE POOL - _ f' g..�� Y 44'. STAAu YwufACOgER'S RECOWEEIUA1gNS BERI.AM)ALL 011ER SEAR CAS MN CDNTRa Roo FOR aSRRBED AREAS WM !�� .� � Jg _ I u ill EYERCENCY W0 FLOW RATE DRAPUGE YEAOOY SEED Ya ,/1 MERE/MATE POO i0 B - -__ +.� ; •8' FADDTATE RST41ARON a r «>.w :'Y111k REST/ETC/2 PLATE NM 1.6•aAYEIER wRRx W WPSaE(13PYK) If Nov[ / FRy q� _'I 1 '� i2•ua5n]Jn i.0.C.10 eA9x4A506( POND BORON Do ION LYGRACTt� • PRE E 2• I, II-P[� i,;��),`%\� LIE 54•aA TYPE 2 CA.BASN NTH OSEIELOW 'ram I IVDwtTER RES1MCi0/OPERA10, GRATE FOR ELERQRCY MERE./ u 2*. SEE C001Ra YANxdE NOTES DETENTION POND BERM CROSS SECTION e u2v D1AS�DN,�h"CanaTM r N01 TO SCNE CONTROL MANHOLE NOTES OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE NOT TO SCALE I.ERDEPT AS SNOYI OR Rolm.um'91ALL BE 01SFRUcim x A00014)YNE WTH DE APRA/D01 RECORDERS FIR A 1010E 2 CAT.BASH.54•WYYW(MEW APO 11E Ott OF REN10 STANDARD PLAN EOM 2.TM DETAES 9WYMG GRATE iWG,nAIOxaA5,ALO 1W SLABS SSE AP m/00r 5TA10Am P.lWVq(AY01$CAT.BASH WTAAY. O PP CR w W SAM E YA1Eau w0 ROTH PER WI PUNS DW05 N0.C0S CO6,AND CDT *00410 53RFAAO(441.YY0S)N CONmRYwa Win BE ANDD4 BE AT J'WO IMJY 1 09100T 9AO1G BY 5/B'D4NEIER STAINLESS S100 1M91m aUGRAZES PER Am PLANS WSDD1 9PM AS),M557(ED n 938 Or OR).PR ORAL ESPwgDH BELTS OR EYBEDDEO 2'x10 WALL DRCS ma COS.mS AMU co, OENr9tt PM ASM DISS](YC0RE0 PROCTOR).Ppoa0 E B 4 000 AESIIRCICR/SEPw6iCR SHALL BE r00010TE0 1*0.0611 MAMMY.O6f { OR C ALLR0M0E0 51EEL OR 06t"G.LVAYAED STEEL PPE x ACC DM AA010 N36, 6" \ n96,Y19),Ax0 Y2)..G4V1R3ID STEEL➢CALL HAD:MEAMEN1 1. 15r ,�y��J�/C "6 =` �C3 ' ' 5.*MET SHALL BE CORECTEO Ma11m 10 USN USN FOR RASR001 04. Cm 9403111 BARS .`Air"• `.'C i' Y'�C- \ SELECT CLASS B GRA1fl BAaE111 x COiaMANCE WM WSOOL 9-03.121I9B, 6.THE AfllnCAl RSER 510 W 140E RESiRICTCR/SEPARATGR 914E R nHF SANE EaIALLY SPA®(.•BC AAA) \ ' \//.,�/.�///.�//. \��., COMPACTED 10 958 W mom WY 0F219tt PER ASTH D1551(WOOED DIAMETER AS ME NDNZ.14 OMIT PPE NM w 6•YWNO/MASTER '1III1I_ PROCI W),R c6EDIRC B GR C. J.FRAME MO LADDER OR STEPS ARE 10 BE OETSEI SO THAT. A)CLEAND S GATE 5 '� `/ DEAR ROWWr W SEES A1O BRJ91, 00DSMRBED PA1M YA1E1BAL PROW R9LEO TO A TRY ARV IM10DxG Mal TR0 TOP. B)cue 00W SPACE 6 CEMR Cr RSER AND GATE. C)04K 04 • - SIRIP TOPSOL TO A YRY4 aPM OF Ir. COST.■M A 10-T0 1ERATORr ROLLER OR ODER IETHOU APPRMED PEAR W C RR(E AMY EOSTS) "1, - CB RISER RYOtE mAl CdiAMNc YORE R6w SS BY DS MOWER. AREAS THAT ARE SCSI.LOOS,GR DING MEL SHALL BE XOOR au*AM.GR[D GRromcs comulav ROPE LA TE CDIPACED 10 MEET MES SECRV1n06 E ROMPED 4O REPLACER. E B.CLEAT/OUT/SHEAR GALE 41YRAM AJ.Or PER AS114 00-26-Z6-32A O CAST R0 TO CB PUP ROD15 0 SOMAS R TIE MORAY AREA BACJ0EL 6 R[91RED D SHALL BE SLEET CUSS B CRAWL BAOFILL R1 AS.ALB CUSS 300 AS REDAED.LET MAIVLE ODER SOLO CP HARMS WM PLAN MAIM ARRAOE W1ERW 6 6ERY GRAVELED AREAS DETAIL Ca0OAWICE■M MOOT 9-0012(1)e,01PAC1ED i0 95i cc/mum ADASTABLE NOON AS RE0.PED. NE000 RUBBER 6A9Q1 RE0WEO RUNUP MSER n/16.HALER.A ROE L.910aTH HOOK CLAMP mos.(SEx91M w0 mu SmNE BARS TOPED i0 UPPER AND IaER coy OEN9tt PER ASHY D14) Y0.x1bIG HAKE.HAD GATE FLANGE MATING SURFACES CA LD AM BOOT N BE WES 2.BARS EWALT SPACED CN/46 Slat E UN15ABlL E NOT A0E0AhlY PROTECTED _.- (ERRoOr R ms 94A}P11401 R T B CR C. YACWNED SCR PRSER HY FUN/Yap.BOLTS SHALL BE 3/8"D4ETER II/16•..'HARE NOl 10 SC4E 090 A IRO MCWE4 S. OW Ra1MG 9HN1 lllpl BE PERfaNEO ODR ALL ROA/0AY AREAS 9.A LIE55 TER. �IIIIIII NOTE ALL YST4 ART C CGRR04. 9. ACCENT LIUNa1T/91EAR GATES TO iMA 1E90.1 SOW 0 STANDARD805ED pSO `` �,, RE951w1,51EE1 PART G4VAN2m. ARE ALa9TABIE PRODDED TMl WIT ME To SPEQIC co ECM/MD HATE •" A 91 Bat,10-3/8•Rai oval Fd pm.i0 M sm.C300014 N. LONER rim BARD,11/I6'IMC[.4' HOOP CLAW 10 ME 914E NOT OPEN BERM DE CLEAR OPENS AS 9NW0 0 YA1 WEN..Li fONNED 10 Eli x GR001C a .LOiAL GATE-0 51A1V4P.V P.0-3 SHEET 2.BY WU WOE POEMS.STOP TAB.. CATCH BASIN RISER 54'DA Coln BA91 W92 500E 011fR DE0a. PROFILE 'GAGE HARE to 610R 64V412m BARB$ 6 GAOL WRC 2•LK Pas,',. ays.•21• /r x A.-PORT PATTERN•3•. ROD YJ51 90 14 i-6• CIIS Y Ii 0 10'OG I 6 000'Y SHAPE PM MI(E IWO 0E GAD[DME.5Q LBO'9.1G DETAE'I$"al OVERFLOWI0GRATE A - 1=� y. YI� my/O Y4L i i y t if r 3-]/I6•D.Po51 > > P\ ; ' II \� \ x �I ED.RoD 5/1S M ROM -.--I Rn1m¢. . E' \ :{' AAw4 GAP ] x W ..� . ; A .:. MM WmYweYanv Jv '\N, Y j MOIL CUM OBE PLA1 PNe 1,F 1._6. FOR ROD UPPLEDmuFAC BY -�. 1 •�� ..\ 0� ,�.\\,�i :\\\ 1 '' ,.,\ A ,\/ yT\'J. � SE11a1G YwUlOnREa W C I E�I Y T Y W[xAlaM[OFNCR / 5 `�y J / \` / r. [T R. ! /. � oa.Yxc 6 xoT 10 4t f 3 / `i. '01' % �.`<. "�: IZ• \ N Bw 5 MOl 2"LONG a• "�" 'i-�' . Iona1W'a Y CITY OF RENTON IT ALA[. IC,YA: VT SING P051101 LIRW0LR. '�Ca St GUIDE TUBE DETAIL ROLLING HILLS RESERVQII�" STATION N.DEPTH 36• n- �\�YO�_ MN PA-12.4.roS1 0 :A.- GENERAL FENCE DETAILS YN 3'BELOW P051 20'OR 301 SWING GATE DETAIL SITE DETAILS 4001 TO SCALE -- 190.062 I RNRR--05B I SCHiT P L JAM 52.1996 1 SOW I I I CO6 1 11.41 • • A WENRAu PILASTER TWIN. x ]T-1' %g✓ � fi are y© I r—{-p—1--si—.1---5-0'—1---n-MO- I 1_isuev<'- �f �• L�"t:4`, w % - I ` _` --IousEOPD NO.fQ DUAL a MC ND SOT ® � \ � r ':�.� c te -— ~ � ki.. i2i±i NA — ,EIAaS f wort 1 F L L Pm,PM,it MC Na sa / 1101 EL O .L 0 3A•0 a 3 I a DR OEuax n.Cr 1 -\ 4 WALL OBLIQUE•VIEW r r ®� FROM SOUTH —-�-—\�+e • _J NOT TO SCALE.APRON i-C-0• - 0 °-pt—� coo* 11'd I :A � v't.� kw� rr\iR 00.1 I� 4i %=`� S•.� -.ate •4:w.ar < ,r_R• L J --I ati -�--11.-,o'I_ (D \ k' p ® � a }-,s. �'riew`-`�' .e a % y ''ti 4 •',•y ?� x`T EafNOrt RM.gt IRG ® / �DY ?` •3....-. z �j�.._'',j' ..mow"-'•'¢�' y s ', RD 5M ECR DUALS ——I was � {' ,� 7��'�.; �.'ti'% ' ®7 ip '0 / S E::ND SOS ra '. y .•''ems'" 'IC c.naxs 6 DDrns.xD �� 'I is Y"'. ®s'-S 1 / AENMATNM RNEIRADONS. ' ®`7 Irx �®� w-r WALL OBUQUE.VIEW si0II �► .. FROM NORTH I NO1 TO SCNE.APRON I ..6-0• • 1 \r®i DOOR SCHEDULE HARDWARE CODES REARIERSRR(ALL sDE5) S��DQV 6 QUERN TA SEE D'6C I /RMAN Ott ME num ANIL LETTERING EN AM I 6p i To• 5h4 STEEL D`lK/6DERN CO ROOV C- t<LfR W Y/L0f%di Si-- O / N0.505 EUt DEiNLS COV— / D- MAD BELT k RBw LIMON ® (:: \ f 2 ARCM 1 CO'Y TO• SILL sal RAP ROW DOTS k ASTRAGAL U-1' • AMEN I co.i TO' SRp STEEL ROP ROW ` MANWRACM- DOOR ST( t(MALL MIDNNTI OR ROAR B CRIER ON COMM(WIaM 1 MQr 1 so.Y 1b' SIR STEP NARK WARTY ROW O- NCR sip(HA MOM) 0 xR-f' I 0 N_ PM/PASSAGE LA NARDNAE A 5 O 1 SO'i TO' Srz[L STEP R[STROW I_ OMCL SERA qt' " 6 MOE 1 SD'Y T0' SIM STEEL SAIWh COMM ROW J- OOm CLOSER WALL PLAN LOUVER AND DAMPER SCHEDULE IN COP0ER OTT w4RACRMR YODEL AC04ME5 LI M1WAn MUM I AM DIG EERN5 MIND ROTE Lx CUMNADCM LWLER 1 LOWERS k DOPERS NC 544-I2 ACNATOA:SMBMA MEW(NA AIR) U LQMR ND DAMPER I l0INS a MINKS NC. 1-Al.LW-P ACTUATOR:SAMARA Capful(NA NB) FINISH SCHEDULE N /O MER AD MOM I LOAM k ONPwS N[ p-It EEC-42 AMATO&BARBARA MO AR(NA MB) ALL IWERIOR NAMMNRANE,IC M b NM ROW ROMCEIML ILL Roll MR.PALL SIP.RNL SE NIL MIS U AMR9RI11ER I f`�111 ■�I RAP ROW COATED 9EENP�OOc COATED Mu COATED ON COATED ON COATED au W�� l6 LONER AD RAWER I lwLOtS k MAIMS NCR-xl,PI?P NNE mc.mem. ll NI-usual WW1 LOUVERLOILERS k MIPMS NC. NEL-Q AMA*BARBARA MOM NA 410ZPIG [!R. A I MfNMD COMO CORD COATED COATED cDARD prat. PIE CALERx ROdPW - CONOER CONfApE CpMCACR CpgRIE CONCRETE U GRANNY IFMnAIOR HOOD t TOWERS•DAMPERS.MC ACN-tW l t D.NC R06 OAR(A00p:A-IM) PLANNERS a wNu C 1! .RAu � 55540 ac(I4iNe T! DINE/EUNQAWR MIMEO COED COATED ON COATED Cu/ CHID ON CORM pN OKOAhD �M�b WW ROOPD 9C7.0d EA. DUNI B NOT TO SCNLt I � PAR wu R n INURED COATED COATED Oki COMM au COATED ON DM,m MU MOO TED VENTILATOR SCHEDULE IFBARK NOT x•LOG D R. ROW ROMAN SNEERti C ON N0. LENRA4O Ott ION ROMAN HP BAOMUE DA MEN 5.NEACNRR MR KC/SIM CITY OF RENTON RSMw" FL 9E�ETgD c COATED Os( COATED CAR! COATED ON COATED ON W�� n RAN ROW MAW 1.R]0 RAN 017 NO TOP ENONEERNC 1NM PARS L MG.( SARUM IMAM CORD WCOATED NL WIWI/CND..ROW 1 MWSE ISO RAN am ND NAA131MT.IC RR 6R HD Pon(Na c 6) ROLLING HILLS RESERY LIMP STATION CONTROL ROSY ROOTINGSHEEIRCIX COATED Mu WAIm On. COATED ON OOAhD NuWl UI ',ATER wNlh KM 1 MANS, 7S0 RN. OIl IC ACME MOEERNO MAIM 060 0100 NNW SSE) .- ``y U" 1/4 ENME/LMRAlii ROW MAN SE USE 12.000 On in. NO ACME MOEERMO NAVE MAXCUM BO ATION WALL PLAN IS R1S1Op1 I DRAW 50 PIN 0.07 RES MOAN NO MALE ROM EA:INO AI NO 443) t114 C6x I R1MW-all 174, it I JAN z2 1RB8 I MOM 148 I SO2 I IA..47 NM FORD'FEIYE MOEEC M Control R PI FORE SHALL BE PURPOSED A CON11.003 ROL 011 Erosion Cont of Notes MF LENGTH O MF BARRER 10 AVM USE OF.ONES.WEN ONES . ME NECESSARY,FILM CLOTH SHALL BE SPICED MI...,Al A THE NFLEYalATON a THESE EROS.C.TRCONSOMMEO REREYENIS D THE CONSOMME YMH*•NCE RERACCLE M NT. D UPGRADING OEM 6 it SUPPORT POST.OM A WA.6-N01 OVER.,.AND BOTH FIRCS RESPOWNLM Cr ME CONTRACTOR UREA MU CPSMUCTDN IS APRo.AND PEMMENT MECEIATON 6 ESTABLISHED.T I ESC MDUNTEAENTS ARE SECURELY FASTENED TO ME POST. LOOT NAY MIXED Damn BRAKES REPORTED 10 BE NSIALLED PROF TO BEGAN/NO CONSOMME IR MOSE MY AD ALL TOMS B THE FREER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE NSIALLED TO FOLLOW DE 6 M BONDNKS O TO CUARPG WIFE SAu11 lS CUARIr RAGGED M Of MD PRIOR TO CPSTTOTP. DIKING THE 1110CMCMM PERIOD.NO CONTOURS o r FEASIBLE).THE RACE POSTS 4 011 BE SPACED O .^M OISELPROITE BEYCNO THE FLAGGED CLEMMIG MOS STALL BE PERMITTED TIE M60NG SHALL BE ANIMATED BY 1TE CONTRACTOR FOR TE DURATION CF N.M.O 6 FEET MART AND EMMEN SECURELY ALTO THE ORM. �• TONRY PACKED AND STATED CONSTRTRUCTON. (Mom O PO NOES} �^ S,_ ' BA[5 ME EROSIM/SMIONiATP FAGUTES SHOW ON MS RAN MUSE BE CONSOUClEo II(011 CTION NM ALL CUPPING AND CRADMG A4M1E5,AND N O.A 1RENOI STILL BE EIICAVAIED,ROEPLY B INOIES NC(AND iz y, pE('•Qt,V SUP A RAWER AS 10 PARE MAT SEDNEN1A10N UCEN NATO DOES NOT ENTER THE DARIACE SYSTEM O MRA1E APROIBRE WATER STAIDARDS NOES DEEP LP SLOE AD ADJACENT 10 Of 0000 POST TO ALLOW ,4;E'! to.. 4. ME MU FABRIC TO BE BURIED •. .d06 d .'T Y pEEp TRExcN- ME EROWM/�IYExunP FAOUIE5 SOON P MS Flo ME TN[wYw RCDUFEAENTs FOR ANTICIPATED yR 00401 MS WNNL THE Lp$1RUC1GI PERM.THESE EROSON/SE.IRITATON FACUTES SHALL BE LVERA➢ED(E.C,ADDITONA 91YP5,RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES FTC)AS NEEDED D.STANDARD SMRPGTH OVER FABRIC SHALL USE A ORE MEAT ARM' •'-/6•••�'A<!'i:', TMATCH BALE x OR UEk1(11FD STONE EVENTS. I FENCE FASTENED$DIRECT 10 TIE P SLOPE SCE CO DE ROSES LW.C .�•;% ;, 1[•VY-PUTTY NNE STAPLES AT LEASE 1 NP LPG.TE TIRES OR NM •4ir3 -- ME EROAP/3OYMATP FACTURES PINE BE PISPECIW DAL.BY THE CONTRACTN MO SANTANED AS NECESSARY TO FMS R(TER C.MLED RAGS. ME ORE SHALL E1100 PTO OE TRENCH A RINNIw OF 4 ••i'.-.V MICIOMG. NOES AND SHAH N01 WEND ACE TUN.16 INCHES AEON RE SACK,AND COFACT FOILS TROTH ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE TRENCH ON UPHLL SOF Of HAr ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION.INOW5G ROADWAY FIABAAOYENIS.WADE NO FURTHER NOON 6 ANTCRAIED FOR A PERIOD OF 15 DAIS.SHALL BE • BALE RORRER wE 0TtLl SIABLIZEO OM ARNOE0 EROAP/SEDMENIARON METDOS(ED SEEML.AULPNG.TEEING,EROSION BUMPS.ETC.). E.N AOOKN.20 RICHES OF THE 11*00*RD SIREKM FILTER FABRIC 91A'1 BR[MENDED INTO TIC TRENCH. Ti FABRIC 4151 NOT EMEND STAMZED CONSTRUCTOR ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS STALL BE N51NIE0 Al THE BOKNL CF C0N51RUCTON AO u5M1ANE0 FP DE DURATION 01 THE MORE TON 36 NOTES ADM ME ORK}NAL.CND SURFACE. FLIER PNOECT.AMORAL MCASUMS MAY BE REPORTED 10 N9RE THAT NI PALED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN TOT DE DURATION OF ME PROECT FABRIC PULL NOT RE STARED ID[SING TREES F.[KTR,_STRPGM R1EP FARM AND CLOSER ROSi SPACING HAY BALE BARRIER DETAIL WERE S ONG F.TEMPORARY EROS.p NTROL IS FEOMED,FAST 1EMARAING(BASSES DMA BE ORED Al AT IPPA_4IE RAT:(EC.0050.DR E NNATES ME REWItEYDIT FOR THE ORE NEST SUPPORT FENCE. N NW TO SCALE RRRKAL RYE AP%SD At ARPROWNAIFLY BD POJIDS FM NOS). D.J.A CASE.ME FLIER FABRIC 6 STARED OR ORED DIRECTLY TOM WERE SM•N NAP F.DOPORARI 0109.COxMO 6 MOOED.It SHALL BE APPLIED Al•IM1LV MIXMSS OF 1N0 NOES POSTS NTH ALL OTHER MOMSONS O STANDARD NOTE E APPLY... L.THE MEND SHALL BE BAWLED O.}/A-INP TO..DIMEEER TORPOR..RLNOT G(METATM$NHL BE NSIALLED 10 PREVENT BUMF FR.ENTERING ME PROP05(0 PUMP STATEN PAD MI RESERVOIRNSAS ' WRIHG WASHED GRAM4. AID UPON C 411010x Of DE 9R OHLIIIFn N FRIER FOP.FENCES STALL EC REMOVED OM MY HAMS CEsto SLOPE ROUPE0ING 6 RE01Nm ON ALL EWABEMIS TOM SLOPES OF 3,1 OR GREATER. VY DOZER TREADS 10 CREATE GROOVES PERPDMOAIR TO SLOE DRECTON. THEM InEFUI PURPOSE.BUT NOT WORE THE UP ROE AMA NOS BEd 1. IMMANENTLY 51ABL@D, DURING CONSTRUCTION.FT1ER FABRIC SHALL BE RACED N ALL CATCH BASIN NET ORATES AND MIEI1ANED AS RLOARED TO REVERT CLDGGNG. FILTER FABRIC FENCES.ALL BE INSPECTED NUELIAT1Y KIUV[N SPRAY WATER AS NEEDED TO CONTROL BUM. 5E(DUST ABATEMENT RAN EN MS SHEET. LL LY RNNF• AND Al LEAST DA DORM PROLONGED RAINFALL Y M01Nm REPAIRS SNML BE WOE BWIlDUTLY. BOTTOM EDGE 0 LAST PROTECT FORM AO ST0004E AREAS FROM FROMM TINE STRAW MUCH MO/OP TEMPORARY SEEM. • 7 BALE OUST BE RIPER THAN RUNUP WATER LEVEL ALL iDPORARv ESC MCA9UE5 SNAIL BC RFAO'ED LPDN STABRlUl101 0 M 91E. TRAPPED MEOW SHALL BE R0OVE0 • NYW WATER LEAL (RCN Ni.6T655) MAME IN 6•.lr TRPGN.LA,SET FENCE •.. X TROUGH AID BACKFILL IA. • ROCX ON0 TO BOTH SONS OP MOPE MID CP FAC / / DO MDT COMB 9RRONCIC IMP... STRAW BALE BARRIER PLACEMENT E?s MOMMORCI FENCE FABK EOIAL 10 HOT 10 SCALETI MON GT NE-100E.NTH AN FOS•0.15Wm. SEORE MO SUPPORT TINE r 1 a•BY • '�� M 5 LONG STAKES 6'.CEWIER BED @R 25'.MM.r BY r BY la WUQ \/R •'S ., � Y` :rY IRE FANG USE STARES OR 1H MOM ��\ � . .. Ot, Q TO ATTACH TIRE TO FOCI ,w / {S f�, \ / / �V \S �\\� OEPM••lr MN l�aa' Dt. �:%��\�/ Y r m r Boa TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \•'/�y/ / /� °Si"'`e°a 5` o Faa` AND TRUCK WASH-PAD DETAIL `x, .\ • 01 1O SOLE EROSION CONTROL FENCING III 10 SCALE - - DUST ABATEMENT PLAN • -CONTRACT.SHALL CONTRA CONSTRUCTON DUST MOO COIAMNAING ADJACENT HOES AND OTER PROPERTIES H105®AND STRAW NAP -OARING ALL.*DING AND EARTH/OW OPERATORS NE 51E TILL BE ROMEO OEM PEN 0TCH 6 USED, TO COMM CONSTRUCTION DUST. A. t -CONTRACT.SNAIL CONTROL CRNSNUCIION PAST NOT ONLY DURING -- CPSIRUCMN HORS BUT DURINGME 5�E105 AND BONGS HORS O.NRI0TIa la' -I 1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION APES MAi CM NOT BE WATERED DU 10MIENVErriTh P Z ERO5101 ML BC COVERED TITH PUSM.oTSR SIATABLL NIFANATVL NARZ n� 1 M01E YAI SWORE•100R KTH005 TO CONIRO CONSTRUCTION DUST. • t1 .1EHMld[E RFHN,W - SMOKIER WORMR SER SISTER MAY BE REPAIRED TO COMMCOASTRUCMN OUST. DRAW 6 MINT 10 SCARF RUNOFF CONVEYANCE DITCH DETAIL E BAR 61101 r LOG D Z. MOGCi.t0 C4 WITH.ILL RRON91NS P 11E LEPARnExT. NOT 10 SCARF [[0.0GY GIST MA5ACHi PUN MOMMA[xi5. CITY OF RENTON �( • ROLLING HILLS RESER aI'�:e d0';'STATION GRADING C� D TESC DETAILS I9A.al I*--0N[SON I wave 1 JAM u.1.0[ SHORN [AO(m7 1 1.•A. • — , � - . \� \` ; . -LEGEND • �r�' _ ` ` `\�:. '.` \ PONT-O-NAY COMMA( / �� - � `�\ r�E .\\ -� `v.X. \h\°r \`\\\`\`'�A • NOMMEN, .1'*- / -� , .�.�.. Or �< • ` \I`\`R • PROPERTY LgNER r�>w j _ •_,,._ . �' -W I \ . a\ � \, EASING DEW . { / ��` `\ - ..1_ SCS W - - \ \'\`\t.. `�\ ``�\ EASING PAYCNExi ENE / - !�i ((�CM�L� ��(C■� \.lY�(A '_ (f,, ua \ y. I CASINO iAYfYENi / `Z`\1+(Y M! RCS ./ / _ -.{'1` \ \. \\s.\ �\,,p 1 (t i EASING URGE 1REC3.DO NOT pS1URe .,\ .. ECOMO GAS ASTxG IRAPTN SIGN`► ,�� a/ __. \ \' — EAznxc OVERHEAD PORER • . .••. • \ - ,. a4 \ / / \�Y \ EASING LHDERGRaND POOR /_. �, • / /.' _ _ \ — To— COSMO SANT¢SERER SINO SIORN - \ EASING 0`.4NNAOehLEMPK / -. u \ ...-.n , SBO^SRR - � ./ 45—_ \`\ .;�:�:- - -- EASING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE % \.. ® \ \\ ►r�,. \ / . 11\ —• .— EaSPE DDNES IC NARK / % �! O - �\ ,%�- ' ,\ V ic { EASING r caraN .I 'AE \`\ \ -• I I EASING 5'CONTOUR . \ \ I I PROPOSED 1'CONTOUR PROPOSED 5'CONRM.R / ?'. _ �`�\ _ `0C1ENIa PO10 oSUNLOM RIM p1ARRY SP.ALLS O \ \ -. CARE TO RSDoI/AWA 9-116.6 DPTH \ PROPOSED NARR YNN __._4_ `,. \\ I -— \ , \ \ - I I' --.—.-- PRDPOSED SANITNRE/STOIN/nRAN Fff -�- \ \ • \. PROPOSCD fExONL NNf STAIa RDDP OR M DUVALL•Ix PURR. \ • 1 1 PROPOSED C RAK1ED AREAS PALLS EDUAL TO RSDOT/APNA 9-114 6'DCPTI \'' \ \ �, i '. �1 4/ j D� �J •• , I IT ' I a — — — PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LAMS \ Vi, ,, i s"„ / f "Y' \ I di DETENTION POND j \ I W I CONTROL POINTS • z vaxr NwrN.r, GAstNc pPcpnPTON / 1' /. ._. \ \ i i © OErExnax PaxD` i '�\ I I o 1 mn6W O]OsneW Poir Bona I i I 1 L_- Sl1v . iM�,Vy-.. 2 1nMp77 13057E133 POD BDna I 1 - ..{ 1 - I I I - I e X I Ib ] 1n1D9.52 r]05106n POD WHEN I C s.1— I - • IS"B>r1.•�� r • 0TNS - S y• 5 F.,: - ^j�� 7�I N rremlee ,]mAil6 POD Bona 1 s,.sp .0..ii.,. •f-14f0 / `\ 1 * r _.\ 5 172627.21 1�LR'J POD Bona I' �,•19 `� /' 6 ine51.t6 1]MN6.Oe POW BOTra 1 :� .0 1 rtII. \ I 2 rn90163 130564501 P O BOTia 1,,1, \- \ G 'T. -\ i e 1mn.0 r5ose6zs van eonw �— ' I I le, _ I�i v trn6110 13056e8 et Poro Bona / . . { \ Off, \ +D 172,e1.04 156723 00 PO1D eons I ' 4� • I �.i. � 11 +TNn15 I.105>A261 P1W BOila \ \ i j \\\ 12 n2ee669 tYYuMJ.66 POD BOita • µy�� RA[lER IpIQ\ / DERF aFPOeD f7".ISE `' `\- \ \\ :O I I{ Nip OM tn \' \\ \\ I I 1\i��., \—�IC - �� . \ _ _ - _ —� \ \ I I pNGr\,..—....—. �—.— . \ \11 I I PLANNERS I eG E wwo Rno.,sFnAev \ I ))) • DR 'PT SCAI \ mAe.e N.. �, \ 1 { I ''' CITY OF RENTON \ ROLLING HILLS RESERX STATION 1, a PLAN 2 o `'-' °� I I PROPO,�Br l LANDSCAPING PROPOSED SiTE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN II +' M' 194.062 I64111-U421 SON 1 TUT1 JAM 23..1996 I SHORN 120 1 COS 1 10.47 i 0AU1 FRO.TAM]•'E•R AT 2'0C..M. ABOAE DRAM.n B07 EIOM. F✓-�17-10•--�1 r'e'-D''�I s'-r B'-D�—u'- —� I � eL 12 1 ,, , Y� I r`r �' r-r +�7� r.ra[Ncntst:Arzac. ��i{� a y ti_.,,Sr '� :1:f }'��r ' rr d II-0t' • ,1➢. PIIQO[DdHE.OSR,r , - . '.�'''4�1, , ` f' '{'r}r J LEDIESOF WOW 09MG5 ' '' rA y nl' I ,' 1 ' ' ,� i--- J IIIF i I 1 IIJ ROOF ELEVATION 8" - - �r s r orC rn SKYLIGHT NOTES r 1 n9 uaPOv.¢" t. ' ROME WM.,-1/r NE IWO CUM.FM SNMTCIT ' SWAM.. C[. C 1' mu In FACE OF IENDADADJACENT S ar ,1 f - N. •� sEA cSKYUGHT M IaRBNnm[R SwcxEEn REQCOIYEIOAns n 1 , , i WIIBIF 2'.6•NRP RAERRS. AVORN MD.CODE. MLI N ACCORDANCE AM ' !! r 1 .,. ' WS,E OOUG-iY-URDI REC ENDAIIM Cr HUAI ROOF imPAC1UREB. ' 'l - ,' l _ r'r ' ``�f 'A `' —� suEcrsrRucMMaETER. =� ��... ,,''ti' f rr'[ 4--- ::1e ::n::ai2u f ===== )f } 4��r..'LADDER mAuxc AT z'Dc.rm,fiETTEEN TOP MUSS 2i ,'y-. ,: =a __— r d ,' t 1 CHORDS AT Ran ME HEWER BMW TRUSS Wd9S AT _ ' _._ ✓ ' I dRDRm CAM MERE R is ARE GREATER HIM I AA ARE �' ,• . rt' ,1,,',{;[ GAB=1'000 1RUSSEs AI Z DC.M MoMG DINE GAINS AT PIS(TOOr LN„PI,y FPAITU AND A,DOS n ROOF ELEVATION Ir-J GAINS SECTIONS wPvaei Hy rvAYxc) e-S/.GL*I LENGTH.n•R.tw CI - UV E Y AMS Y. N uNW[Mr EYING GM 1DP WAS FLUSH PITH TOP OF Cu RATE At O WW1. &O. PRO MO(OM IN OW YMLS MU i______ , �-yp �" OatMum TO ACCEPT EAR DM - s. r B ✓ \! ter ,0.� �� : j70re I I ^�^ `ter- �"� � �,• .. (�zd fro. - - p :•.... _ ._ :.-..Fri?�::::' delli 1r_ �r ROOF FRAMINGPLAN ASC E. ED RO E CAP, ROOF OBLIQUE ~ TWK.AL AT PUCE YID KR ••• NOT TO SCALE °"" """` ASC A r Re Ron Ma =� FRAMING OBLIQUE R°n 14t NOT i0 SC P DIMANACORED Iriftmir YN GAEE MUSSMUSSPITOm SMGIIMIOILO / _ • 1/2'OM MINOR 80.15 YM r .M DLL PALE Al MILL . ,'' T.- ��_-. MMRIW EMEOYENT Ar lr VI T ..,. .•/ EM i IflIL04 TM BOND ro _ .y�� - c wMT D Aue rRD YAi y A"i..7,....._ �L_ a LDunws n LRDutED _ _ CRAFT r n APN trap BA_ R SE lICM CELLS OM BI61 • `�.�.L NSULAMIN T''Pm.FUL WAG .a ��ti....... ':.?��` a.:'t'.. R F - 00 OBLI E QU rot 10 SLUE ••• :� SECTION .a a'` L` ROOF NOTES FRAMING OBLIQUE 9(MIW1 ,PPFABOCAMD ROW TRUSSES AND CROSS-BRACNG 5.PROVIDE.YFLB MOONING FELT OVER RJ6 SEAMNG. 10.Mom QIWL AND (H RI!OPDANCS NTH Y GIMP ' LADO[R FRAM AND/OR&WING EMEN'MISSES SHALL E DE9(NED MALLBOARD MEETING ME REWREMENTS OF �"Y, AND CER,PTEO BY BraUFACTLFER 10 WET LOADING 6.YCiM Ron WALL E ASC PACPC ar-RY W Mat MITI C630-21 •'NVwe wig A'WNW RNN GUM[R, PffYwJFACMm CRITERIA(DEMO/M(AHERNE RMIRUCTW WIN POYMNM RIgROC/NYwa Sal MANGS AND ; •�' �, COx LLAmi F1.LL ButnYG ILPREOCO Mt TRUSS NOTES D.NO.W1. P.E.STAInm muss PALES COLOR TOE OIDSEN Br OMM 11.P.O.(36%36•ATMC ACCESS ROO(POT ATTIC SPACE. IAmTmem, PEI E .SEE MG NO C3T CMGAA1gN5 AND'PUSS RAN MUST E PROMO BY A 10 la AD PW%1*I9 a MOVED FOP PDOF ACCESS DOORS TOE 9LMOG(COPPED MD 1Yo,sNRary FOP COMARQ LOCATION = WNMFACiINd. YA1pYAL5 MID.WAYM19N. x19AAlCDcstypowe [h G I ry L LH f . 2 Ar,Ad MUSSES m SO R-1M Ia.S.ESW SMMG ),AITACHIEHI TIE EM AE1M ROOF PALLS NO ROOF 12.FAME 116 Mr.Gott PTLOIX TRY Ai TOP OF Y C I� R T N imAncm wpm NE NIO n CM SEISMIC ANCHORS AT 0019DE FACE MOM LULL BE EDDED BY MMAFACMER TALL RAI BULB.PEWTER. OF WI MD SAFSW SHIM R N5 n EPA.SE5MIC t0 RESIST MFU Mn OMER LOADS ESWBED N TM B NOi 10 SCALE 1.6 Su.PLATE Al TALL CEILING'AST MrMIORS Al M OE FAQ n WALL. QTERM NOTES 13..PROAQ QM PAPER FACED BAIT A-30 MSUAMW AI x MM S NOr}'LONG UB ILILOIX Wm cYPwY TAl1BGA0 3...00 ROC'FRAMING I MEWS SHALL E UCH-M rt 6 ROOF ELALMG WALL E AL:PALM W DIM CEI1WG 0 t 2' OR BUM UNLESS NOTED OMERMST mum i.GAUGE 4EE1 ETM NO SMALL N.ALL MOO WV.AETtBERS AID NALCRS N CENTKI CITY OF RENTON A.Max Wk..WMl BE Y..It/1S'ML%AESS BE DRAMm MATOI ROG PANELS NM Cw BLOCK IF MOSS.MOM. 11�,,,. ROLLING HILLS RESER. . :+L A IION CDA E BETRR APSE RAZED Rn10O.MAl[0 i0 MUSSES 9 GLII(xIG mu E co PI_256 A CWM CLEAR 15.ASC PRODUCTS USED AS WTFTIIL S'ANDArO,COYL 8 � 1 ION ROOF N YM MMMW 66 HMS AT.-W awn AT DAPNRAGM SNCAE-CCMPWENI PCOURCMME SEALAMT. PRODUCTS BY OMER MANFACTURCRS EL E ACCEPTED. BOUOARES AND 6'W CENTER Al OTHER PAWL EDGES, [AWING SMALL E APPLIED w1EdAIF1Y PRIOR SECTION O DM.firPENETRATE A GMYW n 1•INTO Ran i0 CONCEALED Y RAIAMW AHD SHALL E C YRE F T NAND DETAILS 1 J1- ® 1 TO H AILD BY RASIMIG. M.06z I MO-Ms I PR I wE i.wi n,1w6 1 s I iz I I n..•T V .- REffR,aR Boor, HI I I 11 11 I 111 I I I I lia 1 I I I I I I I I IP. • ......,...................„...... „,,,,,,,,i.... .„,...,_.__,.___...... ,,,,............„„:„.„, ,,,...„_....,....• „ ::... „ ,„ RE4RRDR ONERlOR F,PE. t UP* �♦ DND K. I1 -i ��l:: al illik 111111111011111 Oil I/ 1111111"ral •. RE,..PRE:11.1.. - _-_ 4L of xD ssl Mil, '_,.. sEE• ,..., aND NO •� RESERVOIR OBLIQUE I NOT rD xuc ____,„ _ NCYR,OR P06 fRNRNC. __,...........„ ,....,„ ,„ ,._„......„..... , ,„ . ._ _ ` � ` _`_ Unw[,ER: u'-D•(on.) ��N � I �� -. ....... RESERVOIR PLAN 11111 MOM MY-0* � � i MEMO ACCESS. PE Ow N RODE, SEE OK Na SSB _ - ME Ow 0.555 -- I■-_-'.i__-■I RE4R,OR INLET%P[. . SU D+C NO.N52 Iill IMMI RE4.MaR SM SEE DNG ND.5LL 57 � PLAMH`H` RE4RMR WRET MPG • 9 C 1 Ciii +Qum=anr. II 4F D�aRoarN0110 SCALE 4f DN4 Na RESERVOIR OBLIQUE RcsEVNa aIA+ND a xor AI xuE r Rw HNorrLONc r. • REsxwiR ROOM. CITY OF REN'ON PM.SI DONG NO 4I DRc xo.ss, ROLLING HILLS RESERX,OJR STATION , o RESERVOIR ELEVATION ?4ESE U� FIVOIR PLAN 1M.062 I+ew-D09 1 Nw Inv 1 JAN 23,159R 1 SNOW 1120 1 m54 1 n:n win ' .. me y : E ;A$ r \ ■■■� ,+ Qa1. unit i�ii V: 0 4 1 aDles !re' -- , :. mi, ..A: 104 -I.--1 49 ♦ hit �i �♦ ♦ ,,. ,_., _.■.f!■[IP 7* �♦�•NP41�. �� 44 \� b • 4I♦ 4_ ♦♦� � ♦,♦AS �A �• � 8 ,!fir♦ �� I4 Pi■ ♦+ Alb �.► %1 & 4s♦,,•►♦♦sA },♦♦�I p4ii�' ■i i4 11111116♦ ICI♦�� I��SA♦♦�7♦♦ *maw mu w ■e © r' • VA • ier mil lipid- ':-Fill CIS��i♦ ♦I ♦� q 9 itf♦♦ • ♦��♦ qv- ,,,, Q I, r �Qlf�.�r�� 321 O P. 00 00 ❑ •i-21 �' 0 ❑ 8-21 ❑ qq — ilbl ,s►r-Pi, LW' Set of Ibis APELES MARJORIE A BADISSY ZINE A BASCO MATTHEW J 1603 BLAINE CT SE PO BOX 1434 1517 FERNDALE AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BERGMANN ROBERT BERGSTROM CAMELIA L BLAIR DALE H 3321 NE PEERLESS PL 19019 196TH AVE SE 2542 SE 16TH PORTLAND OR 97232 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 BOUNDS LORA A BRIERLEY JOHN+KRISTINE Y BURLILE JOHN O+CONNIE S 2124 SE 19TH ST 1814 ABERDEEN AVE SE 1813 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 CHEUNG CHESTER CITY OF RENTON CRABB ARTHUR L 2232 SE 19TH 200 MILL AVENUE SO 2118 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 FISHER GINGER L GRINZEL PAUL S HARRISON JULIA L 14702 SE RENTON-ISSAQUAH RD 1904 CAMAS COURT SE 1400 HUBBELL PL#607 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98101 HAYDON DEL I IGOE CAROLYN I JONES WILBUR DEAN+MERLE 1801 ABERDEEN AVE SE 1605 BLAINE CT SE FLO RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 1701 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98058 KNUTSON ROGER A KOLKE RAYMOND+CRYSTAL KUNNANZ STEVEN C 2548 SE 16TH ST 2212 CAMAS CIRCLE SE 2200 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 MAKI CALVIN CARL MCCART STEVEN R+SUSAN G MENDEZ JOSEPH C 2300 SE 19TH ST 1602 BLAINE CT SE 13817 171ST AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 REDMOND WA 98052 MUN KAM+HOY PUM+PUM NEYERS MICHAEL OAKES GARY D+CHARLENE F HAI+SIM 1613 BLAINE CT SE 2204 CAMAS CIRCLE SE 2508 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 OKUMA RODNEY M+VERONICA OLSEN SHERRIL T OTTILIE CLIFTON J 1802 ABERDEEN AVE SE 2216 CAMAS CIRCLE SE 2509 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 PARMACEK BRETT A PATCH DANIEL R+KELLI C PAYNE DALE R+KAREN M 10212 NE 68TH ST B-202 1616 EDMONDS WAY SE 2543 SE 16TH ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98058 POPOWSKI JEROME B &LAURA A PRELESNIK LINDA J PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 1509 FERNDALE AVE SE 1601 BLAINE CT SE PROPERTY TAX DEPT RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BE BOX 9LLEVUE WA 98009 PULLMAN GERALD S &BETH S RICHARDS TERRI RINGLIEN JOHN 2940 ABBOTTSWELL DR 2205 BLAINE CIRCLE SE 2224 SE 19TH ST ALPHARETTA GA 30202 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RITUALO JUNE E ROBERTS R J ROLLING HILLS VILLAGE HOMES 1633 EDMONDS WAY SE 1700 EDMONDS WAY SE BOX 656 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 SALVATORE MARILYN J SEATTLE CITY OF SMITH CINDY L+KIRBY L 1624 EDMONDS WAY SE PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER DEPT 1607 BLAINE CT SE 710 2ND AVE 9TH FL RENTON WA 98058 SEATTLE WA 98104 RENTON WA 98055 STECHER DAVID C SZABOVA FRANK TAYLOR GARY C+DIANE K 1514 BEACON WAY SE 2208 CAMAS CIRCLE SE 1709 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 TEODORO DEE MARIE THOMAS CLEMENTINE UNITED CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1733 ABERDEEN AVE SE 1600 BLAINE CT SE 1707 EDMONDS AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 VANDERSTUYFT JOHAN VILLASISTA CINDY L WHEATLEY JOE E 1808 ABERDEEN AVE SE 2008 SE 16TH CT MURIE WHEATLEY DEBRA J RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 1725 ABERDEEN AV SE RENTON WA 98055 WIERTELLA R J WILLIAMS LOVITA A WILLIAMS TERRY L 1907 SE CAMAS CT PO BOX 60062 2308 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 ZERR JEFFREY L 1508 BEACON WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 /► v WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources JENNIFER M.BELCHER Commissioner of Public Lands DATE: September 30, 1999 4141141opp iJTP TO: Lesley Nishihira City of Renton OCT © .. 1999 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED FROM: David John Weiss Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Rolling Hills Reservoir LUA-99-119 , SA-A, ECF ACTION SPONSOR: City of Renton PROJECT: Timber Harvest/ Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal . [X] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA Center - DNR SEPA#: 017126 SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 1950 FARMAN ST N I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW, WA 98022-0068 FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY:(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER CP . REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: September 28, 1999 Project Name: Rolling Hills Reservoir Applicant/Owner: City of Renton Contact: John David Wilson; Water Utilities File Number: LUA-99-119, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. Project Location: 2400 Puget Drive SE Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Approx. 4,414 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: Approx. 13,215 sf Site Area: 12.97 acres Total Building Area SF: Approx. 17,629 sf cs ��` _�` i q... RC R-14 \\___________ ' `fi // `i�Rifts'4 ° R-8 o 0 t d R-14 _ otw. • 441,PN:- ,„ 5 L,101, (Mori 1 , • 010 8 4 •. .# .,,.. . fD : � ` * LiJ %aur Pr # ct iki, it� � �\ � 1�' P 818h • \ + .or • ik1\I a, 1 4 A 1:-.4 swv #04,.. 4.! zitt., , •••••44:v• # ode / r-rrerw+\ � IIr� ., 4,„z _ ' R-8 ) 111►/� tllgyll -----.-- 441'� 11 la a�1/a111/intionali t:: CT—e7 R�v/ - 1.1v LA.:,.6''• •�w 1� U all. 1 ld8e I I I I I I I I I l IIII�IIKIII\��I1�111 � MINI1/ �♦ Ill I 1 ` r (I I:�, k Ti s� I 44i�nrm Project Location Map siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn /Review Committee Staff Report ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 2 of 7 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on City owned property. The purpose of the project is to eliminate a deficit of water storage needed for the 590, 490 and 350 pressure zones of the City's water distribution system. Currently, the quantity of water storage located in these pressure zones does not meet the State of Washington criteria for equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. The water tank would be located on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site. The site is currently occupied by an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir and is also used for the storage of sand stockpiles used by the City. The proposed tank would be located adjacent to the existing elevated reservoir. Access to the site is provided directly off Puget Drive Southeast. The project includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, along with an emergency electrical generator, to be located north of the proposed tank. A double walled, 550-gallon, above ground diesel fuel tank for the generator engine is proposed next to the building. In addition, the installation of 1,387 linear feet of water lines, 594 linear feet of sanitary sewer lines, 1,457 linear feet of drain lines, 3,051 square yards of crushed gravel for driveways and paths and 1,000 linear feet of 8-foot high security fencing is proposed. Also included with the project is the construction of a bermed containment area and storm water detention pond to be located west of the tank. The majority of the site is heavily vegetated with trees and shrubbery. The project would require the removal of trees and ground cover on the north side of the site, with the southern portion of the site to remain undisturbed. Approximately 15,864 cubic yards of soil would be cut for the construction of the reservoir and building foundations, roadways and paths, and detention pond. The project also includes the restoration of grass areas disturbed by the development. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The western two-thirds of the site, where the project will be constructed, has an average slope of 4.5%. The eastern portion of the property, which will remain undisturbed, contains slopes of up to 30%. There is an existing 300,000-gallon elevated water storage tank on the site. The remainder of the property is vegetated with relatively thick brush and small to moderate sized deciduous trees. The development of the site would require the removal of some grasses and shrubbery and approximately 170 on-site trees, including Alders, Firs and Maples ranging from 8- inches to 36-inches in size. The project would retain trees along the periphery of the site as well as on the southern portion of the property. The project would also require on-site grading of approximately 15,864 cubic yards of soil for the construction of the reservoir and building foundations, roadways and paths, and detention pond. Approximately 2,146 cubic yards of this material would be utilized on-site for the construction of the berms. The net amount of material to be hauled off-site would be approximately 13,718 cubic yards. Approximately 1,600 cubic yards of aggregates and select fill would be imported for use in utility trench back fill, foundations, roadways, pathways and drainage siteerc ! . City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 3 of 7 ways, in addition to approximately 2,800 cubic yards to be imported for topsoil. The project includes the restoration of grass areas disturbed by the development. A geotechnical report for the proposal, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., dated March 22, 1996, was submitted with the application. Based on site explorations, the site is underlain by loose to medium dense brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel. The geotechnical consultant concludes that these conditions are suitable for support of the structures as proposed, provided recommendations presented in the geotechnical report are incorporated into the earthwork and foundation preparation. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations contained within the geotechnical report in order to mitigate potential impacts from the development. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for an approved Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated March 22, 1996, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (2) Water Impacts: A drainage report for the proposal, prepared by RH2 Engineering, dated August 10, 1999, was submitted with the application. According to the report, there is no evidence of channelized flow or streams on the site. There is an existing drainage swale located along the northeast property line and along Puget Drive Southeast. The construction of the proposal would result in 3% impervious surface lot coverage of the 12.97-acre site. The project would be exempt from providing on-site peak rate runoff control due to negligible peak runoff rate increases. Because the project site is located outside of the City's Aquifer Protection Area and would not be subject to vehicular access other than infrequent maintenance visits, no water quality treatment is proposed. Included with the proposal is the construction of a bermed containment area capable of retaining 100% of the reservoir volume in the unlikely event of tank rupture. The containment area would also be utilized for emergency overflows, maintenance drainage and storm water runoff. Runoff from the tank roof, perimeter road and pump station would be collected in storm water drainpipes and discharged into the containment area. The storm water detention pond includes a flow control structure, which discharges to an existing 12-inch storm drain line located in 116th Avenue Southeast. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF XX DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 da A eal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn 11 Review Committee Staff Report ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 4 of 7 C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated March 22, 1996, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review— Surface/Wastewater 1. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be required for this project. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the Fuel Tank, alarm and any Hazardous Material Systems installation. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Existing Site Plan (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Proposed Site Plan (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Proposed Utility Plans I & II (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Proposed Landscape Plans I & II (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Construction Grading &TESC Plan (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Site Cross-Sections (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, Booster Station & Reservoir Elevations (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Proposed Site Details (Received August 20, 1999). Exhibit No. 10:Drawing No. 9, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received August 20, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in 4-9-200E of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The subject site is designated Residential Single Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed utility is consistent with the following Objectives and Policies contained within the Utility Element of the Comprehensive Plan. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs it Review Committee Staff Report ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119, SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 5 of 7 Objective U-B. Provide and maintain safe, reliable and adequate utility facilities and services for the city's current and future service area to meet peak anticipated demands of the City in an efficient, economic and environmentally responsible manner. Policy U-5. Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The proposal is intended to eliminate a deficit of water storage needed for the 590, 490 and 350 pressure zones of the City's water distribution system. Currently, the quantity of storage within these pressure zones does not meet the State of Washington criteria for equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage. In addition, the proposed location of the facility allows for the higher utilization of a site currently used by the City for reservoir purposes and eliminates the need for siting the facility in another location where impacts may be greater. The site is sufficiently screened by existing vegetation and the proposal would not negatively impact surrounding properties or uses. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is designated as Public Use (P-1) on the City's Zoning Map. All projects located in the P-1 zone require site plan review. "Municipal utility facilities" are considered primary permitted uses in this zone. The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the P-1 zone is discussed below. Setbacks/Landscaping — The P-1 zone requires a minimum front yard/street setback of 20 feet, a rear yard setback of 10 feet, and an interior side yard setback of 5 feet. When located adjacent to parcels designated as single family, a minimum setback of 50 feet is required. At least 20 feet of the front setback must be landscaped. The proposed pump station and tank would each have setbacks greater than 60 feet from the closest property line — satisfying all setback requirements. In addition, the project would retain the existing vegetation along the front property lines, maintaining the required 20-foot landscaped setback. Grass areas disturbed by the development would be restored as part of the project. Height — The maximum height permitted in the P-1 zone is 50 feet. The water tank is proposed at a height of 45 feet and the pump station is proposed at a height approximately 12 feet— both of which are below the maximum allowed. Parking/Access —The P-1 zone requires the principal access to the site be provided from an arterial or collector street. The proposed access points to the site (2 total) would be directly off Puget Drive Southeast, which is designated as a minor arterial on the City's street classification system. Access to the site would be gated and an 8-foot high chain link fence would secure the perimeter. Maintenance visits to the site would be infrequent and would not generate the need for parking spaces. Therefore, the parking regulations are not applicable to the proposal. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposal would be located on a site currently utilized by the City for water reservoir purposes. The proposed water tank would not create significant impacts above the current use of the site. Therefore, impacts to surrounding properties would be minimal. The perimeter of the site is sufficiently vegetated to provide adequate visual screening of the proposed reservoir. In addition, the project includes the construction of a bermed containment area capable of retaining 100% of the reservoir volume in the unlikely event of tank rupture, thereby eliminating any potential hazards from the proposal to the surrounding uses. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project to adjacent residents. These impacts would be mitigated by the proposed hours of construction (8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday) as indicated in the applicant's construction mitigation plan. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report • ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 6 of 7 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. There are no significant natural or human-made features on the property that would be impacted by the proposal. Construction activities related to the initial development of the project would be required to utilize best management practices through code requirements for an approved Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP). 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow for the City to achieve compliance with State requirements for water equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage in the 590, 490 and 350 pressure zones. Therefore, the project would be likely to conserve property values in the area. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposal would not increase the current number of trips to the site and would not be subject to the parking regulations. Locked gates at each of the entrances to the site would prohibit unauthorized access to the site. As proposed, the driveway and gravel roadways appear to be of adequate width for the safe circulation of maintenance and emergency vehicles through the site. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed structures would allow for adequate light and air circulation to the site. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposal is not anticipated to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise and odor impacts in the vicinity would not have a significant increase due to the proposed development. The applicant's Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan would mitigate noise, dust and odors, which may result from the temporary construction of the project. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Existing public services and facilities adequately serve the subject site. The project includes the installation of water, sanitary sewer and drainage lines, but would not require the extension of services or further improvements. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of the proposal. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Rolling Hills Reservoir, Project No. LUA-99-119, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 10. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ldministrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119, SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Page 7 of 7 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RSF). 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Public Use (P-1) Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Bonneville Power Authority's switchboard and transmission lines, zoned R-8; East: Multi-family and single family residential development, zoned R-8; South: Single family residential development, zoned R- 8, and West: Single family residential development, zoned R-8. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RSF); and the Zoning designation of Public Use (P-1). F. Decision The Site Plan for the Rolling Hills Reservoir, File No. LUA-99-119, SA-A, ECF, is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: cf2tfakil.tt/14/‘"T. za /g? Jana Hanson,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 4th day of October, 1999 to the applicant and owner: John David Wilson City of Renton;Water Utilities 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 4th day of October, 1999 to the parties of record: Jerome Popowski 1509 Ferndale Avenue Southeast Renton,WA 98058 Sherril&Lorraine Olsen 2216 Camas Circle SE Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 4th day of October, 1999, to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C.Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. siteerc t \\ / el/ \ / LEGEND RncRu xorzs // —_e�s / i�\ \ ; / .— PROPERTY LK d' I KW-OF-NAY LOCATIONS Dr[LASING(I ES ARE APPROINATE c _ RWxr-Dr-WAY[NUM NENWY LOCATIONS PRIM TO CONS1RUCRM // t. '.�•'� '.F - —\ , . I g SEE DWG NO.COI FOR STARar 9ASEUAC OEriNI. •a s > '-_!. - Trw z \y-N \ /` I // • PROPERTY ONIxdTD�� 111 �` /,� i / ��. �'^ ~ ^'~�^R �\ 1 I _,_•— I MIK FENCE / ! r' AJ/�� - w :� ~ .�es...,,,,_,,,,,,,... \� \�`I \ I/ I E6ING PATt100 _ �i` � '/ •� Y \ „" PRa,a¢D ,. ♦ ' �\�.. S•.., g m '[ °: [Alsrxt LARGE,refs /, � �// .4 �STAR. —4, > .\�> �'\ \ T [USING TRAFFIC scx p \'/ t�y RESTORED CAM D" . ,(49....,.,m: 0: 4 " —r W— CNSTNG GAL ' sI]rARf{ \,• �'AW \ m EzSmc aL • .�/ \ �\: EF srxc DYfRrR:pD POxER — — — — — _ 11".' {_ � ` \� \• I Erotic oraiSANTARGWDPON(R 46' • Erotic STC VARY ER - ,• , i EroTxG STON SEVER //�� I'. . ExrsrNc orENCAn TEEEPNat -_& r ft/ 5/004ff*4. 4.„Idatifilikil•' � ii4\ \� •�'t i —^ • u�nnic UNDERGROUND cs r+rta¢vxaE � //• ///, � / ---.��r \ Ij N, __ _ - EWING 5 CONTOUR ,CONTOUR/ �f q - - `" _ r/'r/ CUREt ` 1i' 1� ^ � r i! •/ ri '�'- . \ - �� PROPOSED 5'CONTOUR ii 9•• ♦ / PM 1 .1 PRW03D O,E7eLQY/QNN I o�nloW/can4a uADC �. / / 11 T �'I �{� l�[ / I'I.rl1 111gfr j SEE ONG NO.C09 RCP DETAILS !F ! A9 IOWATER N559 ZO cA�rzu N01 SEER PIPibWPpKR+An anRWLDETExna Pao AAi ( / - :G/ el B i6`p.... ✓ r ,ao Nun+ 1 ' ♦ 2: �' �� 1I ... �,: #: y""/ -4/t S a R t fd PRaa® wa REs[vwrt i4 `\��! I m ' 7:- me• <..Y QRo§a t; vND _ _-t pbg � t/r V! , PROPa�i9lEbRaos91 Dwdoom/oRNx : "1�/ Cf' a �'DEMO.POND.SEE DWG ON/DR: e l ,.LA / /- / ;13 .eTg .@ N9 FOR D[ras� . .. l m3 j m i i td /' F` e • ' ..." s•t7 tiv/// p t8 f3 • p e \ t y E � / *,.. /k!:;t;;:1 _ • ffi • isse © L' *- -- /Q /'_Y e r // 4s // R\`i• r. `/ --,% - _,.t• 9 0., ()\ t \`• . /T>a ie/ y ` --,s , t0'. �7 ' _tnsTNc caraNs :ee �r 1 �C i;i e p 4@E32 2e i6 .:t 4/. Ma glISIMPPING,MC • I / ` i." . WNGIWWWWW WR.m Nm c a ed! , ' � _ ..� -/ W `:1 — — - eee' T - • S9 oMAWxc o Nor ro SwF >P� } ▪ QpE! O h —• — na/ s N RM o Nor z LONG o r - �`\� �`: 1-V7 Q�_.� --• a 5✓'_A-- C -- CITY OF RENPON A' i8a9 mp ROLLING HILLS RESERYQ[� STATION �1ER 4 PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN PR �VERALL SITE PLAN •so I99.OSi I RAMR-ODS!SO TTON I JAN 23199e I show 15o I CO2 I e4•17 GENERAL NOTES STAIN BASEuc I\�) V TOLL 1�� /' LEGEND LAE UiUn LOCAIaxs SNOW ARE$PPBUXP AIE.n 9IA11 BE IC E CONiRACIDR'y / ��`\ Pry 1Yt wql\ NN A119`'NypRCSRONNUTI TO VERIY TIE TRUE LOCATION SO AS 10 IUD DANAGE QI �, X \\\xV 11R �R• P1vK+tµl'p CAYIENi g5T1P8AXCE /' IYCFPIC9bl /.avt j !q{M� ♦ xy 17 NySlu / A„ _ g / ALL CMSTIUCT(A SIAPMG is THE RCSRON90111tt lY THE CCN1R CJCR H ^^^"'QQQ, / `1.Igl�ptt PM a p� NIIYg MJ. / I RIOAT-Of-NAY // .° .. ` ,} _ -.--.\-~ 1`\e'i µ10 I _ Po(ili-Q-4Y(ENT:RINE • .�6 r - \�� 1 d.4. I'V I • tNOREPCtti COPx[R I 6 // ��' \\��. :.�y 010!' y .. EIOSTNG DITCH 1 •II/ Mlb 1 YC EYSPNC FENCING O'/ •Y�/wr,! _ �A� \ 1 -. EXIST,.CAMEL ROAD �', _ //�� S y t1 2 �_ ?{S1 \ �•_ MENG vAKUENT uNf , .. �: if i aCFr l�� yi �r-*IA, � ♦ E - i p61NW vAIENENr _.! ` a • - -4, \\�`` r If O ® Orr EMTxG uRGE TEES DO NOT OrSTuRB `/ i. .:.-%r }-v° if,•-\:-'tea •a a.y7 a e, Ba et, • \ • \� - ;si ,� EErsnxc TRAFFIC RCN % '/'. al' ,i a Y, �- �.. ` ?®a a� 9 .�,\ \l\ :�1'I�-,_ Mj41 ® re ' p SB50 LARGE TEES i0 BE CLEARED 1, ,' rt/ .wai/\�F — V �` �:'Sa et at\ \._ ti xvnWw' —ra— EXISTING GAS b� — r ,. _ __. S1 r K tic C/ \ ♦ w E.T.a -. - /j F ° f :4 EXISTING OV ERCRo RGNER ° rw-, Ar`S✓ d-- - �"'�\\\•• \® �a ®r \' > e 1.�4..**�y pmlxc uwEPEaa,uo vowEP 8+fl ��. _a .. .. • 1 ,'f. \•J \\ r`` \�a \®t • ` I f .v� \ItR W.VF. — EXISTING sAw1APr sER — — _ — — �er Y � _ J _ 1 • \ ° � 3` '''\ tl r \MI.Eb� x EXISTING SiTu Yr.EP SO r '4 ,\ \ , MOW:OVERNEAO T:L770000 COS NG OROAD PIA19d' AAMI �- / t j M ` 1.. �r \ 'I • a \_` {'' �a b \ �' aw •—N— p4TTN'G ONEESS%w TER IEPXq.F 90. 9 j EA51MD 1 'ar .A f I(/ :41k - — pS1NG i CONidW ' >/ t..1 �9•' 5-. e ••�' 1 ° ® '':i r e — _ p51NC 5'CONrpM A / r 1 °r'. r Sew�E' et a r\• • • ez/ ®s.e,, sre�st eg3 �t I I r NN` � ✓Q,V' p •, � r& a '\-• ®�'�.• r1 ANAl018ttmMfSIICNNFAVLYV[fZirzDN- .# r ( a 3` •:, ; / !� •%e '- fs� -,, a II ! A TAR Ala BRUSH aaY TREES NEARLY A mu3N ' R t x9 yAN 1 \ / •. rw J •r F 6 a +r. _ w --S� �a( a"��y��l' (k Q` � j r IN,E Hsi AA,eo w.EuerzR cr a'AND GREATER ARE sIDAN 1 ®t O_ 'le, - n 1+ dgAA Id•'w ,. ! f/, -,/ et�'a.• Alr$,.' ea41at ✓etJ 1,} 0, . \ \` C',63wry '' av wN ze 45/• �,d . �/ E•1�rgrd I aJ s ° • -®•E- - °.' t®a `•.` �"� STATION BASELINE DEFINITION _ ..4 '! Q �©J sM'o RIE r 1 .r am®t a e0 �S'N. Rey'I OE�BFI6� G EASING 4 / 1 � ✓r ° , t6n�r\ r se,. S� 1 it s a ea 0 so xNc o s1 146 eAaEra 25 to 50 5 sE /, q� 7 ® , I , 6 f _ ees,. a ' ,t 2 END 6 S7ATKN BAYIIIE 113218.25• i]OSSSS.E'' TOR VALVE /! 'ee/ -`` tut 0 't ' 41 I7D.n \ +1' r (3,t'a�q At 1 Wr.G➢a' ..°S t-% _ i\° a .�\ I Q y" .1 `'i..... ma nr aC s1 �54 E ! fY• t.7r.•.•'\ I ...1I�a... G!, •\ I ./. 9r •:1 , S. ea \ • +. __: �t -s 9)aar xloro'as.OE a .../w ./ 7--4/ '` E -- Qr J t { - `.' °` 'N \ • i g4. .., ;'`k �..' Asx��4 SURVEY CONTROL DEFINITION um IJ)m/ ;! re a fl a�a: �a,t -_-� /.� a 1 e J e , .,P.r. ,l a i ! \ 1 E��R,.. / Ppl�' EC �IGPo b�nNr+L Ey5➢NG �r I / %/yi ��p[.®�(�fp G!t • f * \,\ i s`-' I , i �,t' a-St',, \-f QS © s6EEr CONTROL PONT nne096' 1305ATAr ! , /. gAr�Ql4. '�-Y,.,4t' 7q� 0, (�} ./( ^ I l ; / / .ifTi.i o- I / ®r ; ,o ' a 44 '/tr r QE NAM NAFNp Ro)r 1 - twslro la / • . Q 4 yt V C �',,/Se a 1 r / ! ' />It '//.. S, %,; •Y •'1��®t Al QD AIONENENAVERT,' t)21}J.&1 t.1059010] IS12fi / N 6 r �+ a / T" \ • _ / IA C AVERT,'CPMfR 17296.9J IX15RAi8G C>' '\ - 4e" Q a I {Q at •.9 i \ { I e. M. / !/ d � / ?t / d QB PROPERTY CORNER 172971.18' 1305361A' /E. / e / a ' ' .t9 a I,.tP� \ 0 M/ ' / -`e. S a �aa rNE+A (1`r\ .�-1.' [,, 1.�♦' 1 Nr V7 _ /% a Q a /: Iy0Bi A DROKRn CUMER 1J2S11.1]' 17p1918A9' ! ,b, !/ . ♦ \'-M�'a�7r::....t e- 4 j`'1 t./ \� f \ ,+Y .'r f a Q ' Ii,N w,, / I \I r' t1 1 4 a f ��5rya//r_' it \ I i e,,' , •, ` • 6 °e C�"'a! .. xv 1Y51A / 1 S\•l•t, `{•\' 4 FAT e, c�y /`�' a:•� Wt'. ` /l \ r . s,Hi ca ® 1 ,�'\j 3r '� � ea �}}77¢¢fr�E ,, \. --.R • . _..\,,t 4t 4 ed,f e,ie„\ aQ'%eg Fi' :e,, '( \ ' ° \..+ *tc,�t -V- /-- 1 Ir7 ` 'e« t4' 4 A�;r.ilr -. ._A t_ �` \:: .W + T@r ,I ./ O .. �!I I?.„. ®. WPfi] fe, f : . 4: ' _ __tell 06,O� 1Y ENGINEERS. ROMS.MRCS PLANNERS wfwPCC� sl9 56S59JI t aT 4WO iI •�_r - ._®.• a a\8 W K a . Al- • VAIAgn� • • f +E ,6f�, i,+A 'E^° _ \_�-` �- lS �'1'� •_q DRANNC 5 NOT r0 SCNFD ' 2- ! *-f I.3 W "V Vl '•Y K BAR 5 NOT 7 ld1C O173 ✓ ema -,,,,a,..,,,,,,,,,..,,, , ,-- ,,' '")' a ''�i._'--• ' a 8"�rpeo CITY OF RENTON / a Eli } '�,�v / ,y�- • .._„.......- ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR. STATION A / r��.'1.$e to :'�\•`\\k.'4;.�." t'.ai 1.. °• / 0,K yyam�,--��,fu�„ EXISTING SiTE PLAN EXI GOVERALL SITE PLAN 1 m 191-082 I B7 -DO2I wv 1iw .INN 2J.ma e J v FAN ,,w{COI , 2.0 • • WEST EAST E4SW RESERNU0 510 r -- 505 -- -..-.. --_. _. - -.. _..� L VA A=BESER9➢R. 500 .-----f 1--a 490 495 --. - - -. - 485 iM0f91m JNC 475 RREp0E8p B00SRR vl 470 4 4 POWS1Ali0N 460 n li 455 430 -.....- _. _._- _.._ - _._-. C. . _.. - .. -- -- ---___ € i snow As 445 440 ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH o ct, 10 NORTH SOUTH 510 505 � .. 495 490 4e5 490 I vNORtRir UNE S E. 479 _ nRs SIA1gN .--- 41 , 45s $411 * M44WL 445 440 ELEVATION LOOKING EAST .9y , 12 .p ",;. ram. 1. ..w DRARINL 4 N0i f0 SONF _ R RAA IS NOi Z'L01G� 1•CITY OF RENTON of ROLLING HILLS RESERX STATION �SS-SECTIONS 181.062.02I RN8R-D13I Se,I in. 1 JAN 21.1s98 I SHOW 1 10 I f01 11z.7 • .0 - �', / �a. �.. _ _ YS, --"- _ \ \..-. LEGEND �J\k�/ 155 - j'� • �/� - _ _ Asp — — — _ __ _ __ `^•C� \� \ `. REVERE'LINE 'F(`C�1. �" / .l ._ �j- ��yy - � ` \ \' nxill-0OF-RAT t[N1ExtME 6.# /' / — — 's.__ '4• c\w\ zmAr&iE /W +A'/ •i f—I ® l A r Q PROPERTY CORNER LEI / - t� � ACCE59M4 4 MIRE DITCH ETOSRNC FENCE � ��, �� . / �; ti - \ i I EASINL PAVEMENT 40,„ e z _./ uT Q, _� \ F3 ELSnNG LARGE BEES 'P cam CTOt wv V4 .. A57 - % ' \ ESSTxG(PASS AREA �fF. / s,+1 // CEISI ARU FOR / / A .I� CasLRJCna zrMK NO•. — y/ •' \ « / '/ whnw.SLORnGE S_"_.k9 \ //\ 7 \ iii _.F ;A'. �, - '"��,, ,�\ 41 / \ \� �� \ -- FIOSTNG 5'Carau+ .h \ -% �7� /. CaSIRUCIMA I'CWTOUI \ ��• _ _ •,,. /_ 4` �� ,\^ ` ps -. ,�� Caz1RULMN S CONTOUR V �y \�YL .,' ?�.�1 \ �1 ,4FOrCPROPO4DiT0 a �I\\ •' PROPOSED PROPOSED ARESERWR RECR(ILAna PPE ' Asp- _ - ; - SELLER OETRIS Q' 3 ` ' •� �' _.. .. '83 \\ _�� - u "lit SBo zacNwtPPE PROPOSED atk/ / x`��. s .� ) 1 I PROPOSED FOOTING DRANP PIPE Q1 / {� 1QJ = H' 4� - ..��^ _ PROPOSE➢PD4R/ /j / • .p \ / ` 4 \\ , II lyl PROPOSED PORTER [ PROPOS.CULV R t-' EASING 1 \ � i I// ' +•! j ;,+'! �� TDonx�AYo KMKTER � �� PRao40 ERosa coma Eacuc F , � L� / w _i o T r" /� rciNLSs SEE Dxc ra.nD raR `,�` i11 II: ll ,.ao..«m.��••m..,,- PRORO40 STRAW BALE BARKER O4 •� 1 PRawLD RUNOFF COMEYANCE DITCH y/ p /AaSSS GAM I / � +' O jT\ if-, i 'y � :�i •^ ! ! ! +_ ' '`�.• I� PROPOSE)cpxsTRucna UNITS ��,,- RA: a . ��:s, Kl Gam@ % i�� , _i," 'i GENERAL NOTES Ex snNc unln LaEAnaxs sxoNN ARE APPaDANAM.IT sxAu BE mE /'� \ •� N$S \ ' CamACTORS RLS'aS BJtt O VERn mE TRUE LOCATOR 50 AS i0 ANAL p \` 1 DwACE OR OSNReAx;[ "16L 1-7:.L \ ,n- �.} \ / �(+�,. PROI FORPOSED RJW/xD ult)iE5 SNpMP i0R REVFRCNLE,SEE APPROMYAIE gl[ER "'. \\: '( ,y `\`\A_'ALg35 / Jf' /'• `�` e tr. I HI CONSTRUCTION STRUNG 5 TIE RESPONSBun a THE CONTRACTOR. 333 �, ea 4J ,N STORAGE OF AU.MA1DTALS MO IS TO BE TO M PE WIN /: �' +� \ \ - PII�aFD OK➢ilOr/iMtNN` �j ( I 4DIR CONSTRUCT.NP 5(XISTROY REY NNGLLSpL TICV SILL Lp BEN5E0 NNLCN51RUCiKN'. Y e Oi DEIENMN Pao AVD SRN SEE DNG NO c. TOR pElA1L5. 0 3 V \.A ` - 40 DENHAM)MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED AS BANE a TRENCH BAaCtt TTL�] 0 &e E%CAVRMN FOR "'. ` PgapSED 3.0 MU ' N95 CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE ALL DEMO AREAS TO DETNL a BETTER aRpTa. _ '$ GALLON RESER,. ' \ ,11 - __�-,-_. -�_ MLVMWY SLOPES El CafCAY TO HL WRICAAL SALT RE(ILAMNS APB \ Sal \ i _--__._ / 1 SLOPE FOAMS POTENT._ SM DURIN4 RET LIEAi1ER tO REDUCE EROSION AND \ __ I IY SUBMIT ` .O \ .Cy. ,m. ' , ,2�., E ��RI� �M _ ___ [A'�i• APIMO ALK ANALYSIS AN)SAMPLE R ALL BAaf1lL MATERIAL FOR DIPPER TWaK ^ \\ Z1WS /4/� I� CONTRACTOR SMALL CONSTRUCT TIE OETMPIIa POND FAST TO PROVIDE A L 1 \ _ ,rfyS SUTTEE POND/TRAP FOR OTHER Sill MADRG'AWN a SHALL PROPOSE AN (BeA�j \\\ --— e I ALTERNATIVE SECREIT CONTROL PLAN THAT SAT ROLUDE A SMALLER SOWN, L$ tALAI `` ((�� r [�� POND/TRAP RC AD OCTAL MMRQ➢ra DOSES.CGNmACTO SHALL SUM !'..� / .®�W `� I{r1 � "C�S. ��y` WARNS PLAN TO MINER FOR WROTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCMN. Q e/ �67 frJ 1 W •'u` ;'I '� 000 NOl DISTURB THE BASE NW Y/m.mlyym e - - .. II tOt6TANCIORAM300' J I MMOT IS SHORN MINIM CONSTRUCTER MATS SHALL e :- � ,/ I �;�II�' mama. m ••'�jQ2'. �,W\ - 4NxOIAr WHPSTWLMN CONS MICTPNDRBiMKTIN�,5 4MwING)Br BE^DE / / 1� r ..... ..ccnn ''SFW F'4U[ II / SrldG:wO wMAH 0 Ott A ow=CONstRucn RI NSKCIIIR e H c H e c e e p^Q • G:h Y 1Eq, I / A TOTE E AAA C PEERED l= - I ,•..,,, /. x N PLANNER, r� S. C".lA-td+ .� \,Tj I[�I T R Toac arrd +J�7 •• / PROPOSED d I �. `Til.�1•� /�' ; 1,0 / I DRANK N NOT TO SCALE +T:l / q1O NOr CO] / / / IF BAR 5 NOT 7'TONG 0 .. 2- '� • I� ' aTY OF UNTO_ ` "� QL _ _ _ / �_ - J _ � e e ROLLING HELM STATION :: L:Q / C�? � ioN GRADING CONSTRUCTION GRADING&TESC PLAN 1� ND TESCT PLAN t 30 91062 I INR-D331 SOP TAP I I JAN iyaily E.. 2 1 3.1998 I SNOT 130 I CO6 I 3..1I CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION ,;,. ,,..>.;°' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING; On the day of ib+'4'vLbiei, , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United. States, a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division - Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ‘9-1-,(Cr n.. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: e)(_A /a C C141g ,h c. � � () 4 -vI 14YN I(p(V{CHEFF Notary Public injand for the State of Wasjf gton NOTARYMAR PUBLIC Notary (Print)MJyN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmEMPCMONTMENT EXPIRES 6-ze g3 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29,2003 Projec ame: 1�n t „ \ Hh11S ReSet\/O(tr- Project Number: LUA 1 11 , S14 - Y NOTARY.DOC ;y -- ; CITE JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 29, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 28, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. Location: 2400 Puget Drive SE. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75:00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 4,43Th Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agncyletter\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 atThis naner rnntainc FO%recvrler$material 90%nnst consumer --"-"-�".ar�ssax�':"a•�--r��.:. ,t..-... -...+. .;-:.- =�:--'-..��-^i-- ^^sir -'!..:.-'�c�=_�:7i:S+�.> • CITY OF RENTON • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of 'Se pt-e'rv\lo-er" , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 1:29Du Olro, OeCAStOr) documents. This information was sent to: ame Representing J O V.0s(j-y‘ C�Vx e Vu) te-iro-lrv\e 10 D o u.) S In e r�r�l l� vYck-av\Q O k etn (Signature of Sender) Sact--tom•V . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that,�� n ct},15_ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the es and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ,-( 1 . c26) 777 L G.4� MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary PublV in and for the State of ashington NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmen�@xQ4k$9INTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 COMMISSIONIONEXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: Root thus Resewo- Project Number: Lop, . \Y 56 -A ECG NOTARY.DOC CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: October 19, 1999 To: J.D. Wilson/Water Utility From: Lesley Nishihira/Development Planning‘)441 Subject: Rolling Hills Reservoir Project No. LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425)430-7270. finalrtm CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 29, 1999 To: J.D. Wilson/Water Utility From: Lesley Nishihira/Development Planning Subject: Rolling Hills Reservoir Project No. LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 28, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Enclosure dnsmmemo CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated March 22, 1996, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review— Surface/Wastewater 1. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be required for this project. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the Fuel Tank, alarm and any Hazardous Material Systems installation. 4$ CITY IF RENTON ..iL Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 29, 1999 TO: Parties of Record SUBJECT: Rolling Hills Reservoir Project No. LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF Dear Resident: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 28, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 26-irtl,(24, - ) -D -) Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer i CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated March 22, 1996, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. • S DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review— Surface/Wastewater 1. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be required for this project. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the Fuel Tank, alarm and any Hazardous Material Systems installation. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 04, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: September 28, 1999 SIGNATURES: Gregg (1/2 perrerm , Administrator DATE De artmeY�t of anning/Building/Public Works '�Ji hepherd, dmmi ator DAT� f--(F? / Community Services ee ler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated March 22, 1996, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-119-SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The tank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2400 Puget Drive SE Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review— Surface/Wastewater 1. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be required for this project. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the Fuel Tank, alarm and any Hazardous Material Systems installation. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- lowing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for construction of a 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. Location: a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al 2400 Appealsst Drive hSe. published9 of either the environmental newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months determination (RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or by this date, continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County both actions will become final. Appeals Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: State of Washington for King County. Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a 11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton city Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Rolling Hills Reservoir Publication pate: October 04,1999 Published in the South County Journal as published on: 10/4/99 October 4, 1999.6659 The full amount of the fee ch e for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, charged to Acct. No. 8051 . Legal Number 6659 _a-<-1Y4/ Legal Clerk, South ounty oumal Subscribed and sworn before me on this/day of /(//1Y'• , 19� /(� ,,,,, Notary Public of the State of Washington im ©�• ,'e residing in Renton �-0— King County, Washington At.3 L1c �sv�P�*5 • 6 ••G ••• •'Ose1 /8.1 7l1A NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for construction of a water storage tank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. Location: 2400 Puget Drive SE. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Publication Date: October 04, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF The proposal is to construct a 3-million gallon water storage lank on the Rolling Hills Reservoir site owned by the City. The lank will be located directly adjacent to an existing 300,000-gallon elevated reservoir. The project also Includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550- gallon fuel storage lank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing bees. Location:2400 Puget Drive SE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11fi801 and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 18,1999.If no appeals are Bled by this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 875.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.118. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-8510. fit! ii r��. y�l �m �RC NMI .G R-U •111:, 0,,_.. f ,, \,c;- k At,• 4%11!A, .111&(1 110114 ,.-0.11 —"a i�r �' 197•..eir'T;,+1Vitt,..:', �� at t 4 ,V.0116'Arlili:Td " . \''-8 k"M.A. .t.. 6 p 0 , - _Una eall=aSli`�1 .l r r...r n....r, luu .► rs /—�� ,� ,,..N,. MO..”y Ia�'' lam ,r...° ;=�:................ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. I CERTIFICATION I, TeirjCA ��7Npgp0stA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on cSep1 Ytii1 e z. 30, l e1.I C1 • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed an- sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in for the State of Washington residing in e,y,5.4ty,n , on the /cp day of 0lei 1 • MARILYN KAMCHEFF c a-La ,��-)/ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYNJ KAMCHEFF u ' , ' 29, 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 J •` 6 JLk .\ IF RE T Ni .,LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmer an P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor DEVELOPMtNY P - CITY OF REH1�1 ` SEP 2 C) 1999 September 27, 1999 RECEIVED SUBJECT: ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND PUMP STATION PROJECT Dear Property Owner: You are invited to attend a presentation and question and answer session regarding the proposed City of Renton Water Utility Project, Rolling Hills 3.0 Million Gallon Reservoir and Booster Pump Station. A description of the project,proposed site plan and elevations are enclosed. DATE: Friday,October 8, 1999 TIME: 7:00 PM • PLACE: United Christian Church 1707 Edmonds Avenue SE Renton,WA 98055 If you are not able to attend and have questions please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7295. Sincerely, • J.D.Wilson,P.E. Water Utility Engineer cc: Gregg Zimmerman Lys Hornsby Abdoul Gafour Leslie Nishihira 1055 South� Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 i�F1)This oaoer contains 509,recycled material,20%post consumer PROJECT NARRATIVE Project W-2230 CONSTRUCT ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION 2401PUGET DRIVE SE Project Purpose. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate a deficit of water storage needed for the 590,490 and 350 pressure zones of the City's water distribution system. Currently,the quantity of storage located in these pressure zones does not meet State of Washington criteria for equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage. Proposed Improvement Scope. The proposed project includes the construction of a three million gallon water storage tank and a 2,099 square foot, single story booster pump station. The proposed construction will be on a 12.97 acre, City owned site at 2400 Puget Drive SE. The proposed above ground, steel reservoir will be 119 feet in diameter and 45 feet high. The booster pump station building will have concrete masonry walls and a standing seam metal roof on wood framing. The booster pump station will include an emergency electrical generator. A double walled, 550 gallon, above ground, storage tank for diesel fuel for the generator engine will be located adjacent to the building. The work is immediately adjacent to the existing 300,000 gallon elevated Rolling Hills reservoir located on the same site. The project also includes 1,387 linear feet of water line of which 180 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 594 linear feet of sanitary sewer line of which 70 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 1,457 linear feet of drain lines; 3051 square yards of crushed stone driveways and paths; a bermed containment area and storm water detention pond; approximately 16,900 square yards of graded, topsoiled and seeded areas; and 1,000 linear feet of 8 ft. high security fence. No off-site improvements are proposed. After construction approximately 3 per cent of the parcel will be covered with impervious surfaces. The site soils are silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles. There is no evidence of channelized flow or streams on this site. The peak runoff increase for this project for the 24-hour, 100-year event is less than 0.5 cfs. Approximately 15,864 cubic yards of soil will be cut for the construction of the reservoir and building foundations, roadways and paths, and detention pond. The berms will require 2,146 cubic yards of native material with 2,146 cubic yards coming from on-site excavation. The net amount of material being hauled off the site will be 13,718 cubic yards. Approximately 1,600 cubic yards of aggregates and select fill will be hauled to the site for use in utility trench back fill, foundations, roadways, pathways and drainage ways. The volume of imported topsoil will be approximately 2,800 cubic yards. The following types, sizes and numbers of trees will be removed: Alder: 8" — 33 each, 9" — 1 each, 10"— 18 each, 11"— 1 each, 12"—30 each, 13"— 1 each, 14"— 14 each, 18"—2 each, 22"— 1 each, and 24"— 1 each; Fir: 8"—4 each, 9"—2 each, 10"—2 each, 12"—8 each, 14"— 5 each, and 16"—2 each; Maple: 8"—4 each, 10"—4 each, 12 inch— 3 each, 14" — 5 each, 16" —3 each, 18" — 8 each, 20"—6 each, 21"— 1 each, 22"—2 each, 24"—3 each, 26"—3 each, 28"— 1 each, 33"— 1 each and 36"— 1 each. Miscellaneous brush and grass will be removed over a 3.7 acre area. Current Use of Site. The site is zoned as P-1, Public Use. Adjacent properties are zoned R-8, Residential (eight units per acre). Currently the site is used for a 300,000 gallon elevated water tank for the City's drinking water distribution system and for storage of sand used by the Public Works Department's street crews. Adjacent properties: to the northwest and north are the Bonneville Power Authority's switch yard and transmission lines, to the northeast and east are single family residences (Tiffany Park and Ponderosa Estates), to the southeast is a church (United Christian Church), to the south and southwest are single family residences (Rolling Hills Village No. 3) and to the west are multi-family residences(Rolling Hills Village).. Proposed 3 Million gallon reservoir I. Height = 45 feet Existing 300,000 gallon reservoir '‘ .. Height= 135 feet . . Proposed booster pump station LEGEND /g i -- -- I. .,- -- - ' ,.. ; , .....-• \.„ --T / - ts AX\ -:.• •za - --:-..--.\,,,\ \ a• •••-.. - ..:: :-'s -- ...• .-\----\. \ il /4" il, 11/ , , ______ r.c...v....a•rtms.4 • .1......01 . 1.43.C.,SC•0 1.00,04 W I•S•4 rIMIS•Ot•1•10..R. • 0001 0:01011.0110 110601.0100 F:ti • • . ., . - ----0-•--.: : :, \. \\ 1 s" ma.... sa 0.“0 COI IP 1100,MM.MOW. g ''?'Zo-1-'Age- 1101111111.1111.110111÷111& \,.. . ,7 NIW . .....\... „.„--....\. e 10, A1011.11"ir ,4;‘.. )0714....eAte*'...' 2r'+seNN: ‘-. _0: -7 .4.'":1•43c.i.Z..'--**:., s \i.-'.% \Inc•sa ss! .3 4.. OVING oRt.W. 7 ...... ./. '..•.IPS' .;' '';r‘'* .. '' .. ca.. •!....41,.,.._._ ' .0, , ! WSW••,,K 110.. 1_._ / .... Z ‘ ..,.. ,,,c, ....Jt..../,'. U.. • / .""" 0: „ID, •.., N. **'''..\\*.\46\\k .: :. -. , , •• 1 KSVPSt.C.S5 .. .. , •-li..'I' .,-. .,....2. . '.2../...' .. l'er ' 7 ea 4 t * .. ...,.... N. __.,...‘.1. . V,.... , --r.-- taltloC CAS ----..---- ..'- 'IA". , • :I' '111\ \ Se.° ‘, • .0 e. ‘..S.,•••--'-___ -,..4:7"'• ..4,:\ r,% `i \ *••••'..I.,.„..!7• ); s• ..., . ‘ 4. .. Ss„ • 7--_---.---- -*;\ ,N1 INN .o' .;/yi ..,r, '1;;•.1 ..„ • liqpiti.Ask f,,,.., ee V"1 -\\\\% , N II... -,•' '' '-'-'-'--,.,-----1 \ \\..>e' • 1 iihdr, , .1...k(-4.1 . ';'' ,444> /..........1,,.... -4 .1,1/1• :_,..._... .... ,..r__'• ,.TC01,441IN'v/rjr.,. „. • \•k\‘•••,:-\,k \,•,\•,... ,_, Ilk. \ 44\e/ ----...:-T-__-_ ._...._.•_ c.v.,.CCKS0C.01, • 060.0,COM. i .- r' it i 4. '.40' 11'14 ,i.,/1,4•1".. .01 .... ,;\; • Tuf.11 •\N. ...-",.....-' ,. 1 , ,,,. se" I'L,--.../9 4:00,1,-4-Z, \_,))t,._...-,,,., ,,, i)lil 1 fi w If ,$ ----,, / 4774,..:,•,t.„0-,,.....mt77„.., .I.,'//0-,7..rmvi_ _ ,„.1,"\ • \ ,. 1.;, IIII. Mr=077/07.4. \ C") 0,011.0./C0010 wow= : , sa DK 4 ca rso arms I/ I.1111 N. t) .00St1 SUMO.RIACIAlM.,., I -IV 6°:14410.4, t." I / . ,‘ . , del,:-...rif 7 1 N.. \ :I• ••'\ ' 'eh xi to.OSID fa It..looto . if 411/01001W ! ,: .• , ) _-ortlied s-".. I I .14.-G, ,/. _ 1:_pr 24( 41,1,14i:,t,rilN/... Alliipptialit Irv; '12::..),/ ._;_ ,,, ,. .----.1 ".‘ .\::...- II, .. < : • .00SCO11.0 ...rout naccs. dittk .-- eC. 1.4-../.. : .vki, /4 •••• c----..-----*--*A. 411P-r*, ' / I • I .... ', I s‘. . Y. ‘' - I 1 vonsa as.t.PcD ! '',.ec., ,... s, • ...A Fa' • 4,4,N. ""'••• 'NV,.\ • • 1 i e,e- 0 . ..„..:0100.08 MC ' '. ' '. ..."V'S ..V. pl•:•.;r( ,! NN..._,„ It. ,,-..N, -z-t,,... , _____.„:_:•-.__,...______j.. • 'z*, , , eea,...i 0 ,! ..,,,s‘ e) 't ,ce, ,b.co ..: 1.V••V / .."‘" %...... ...Z.....- '..---"--C • N.• -. 1'%. \\ II a• E'E.-•,. a:‘,...; .<-4>/- '..,,i-...',:....,\a".,',..t.,: ,', .....• '', ; ,. ._ i ..' :--.... • . , 2_- -. ---L-___);0 w•! s.‘,...',.' . \ . _. i, . : , ,ov.-...• , .,,•.'...'A.,ye..$1. . °LS 01 sc it, ' - <?:y;'0. .4.: 's4f, :',. ' -(•.:e. , ... ft",& 'Noma osootocidun • ".'‘ co,ors sa act Ks. • , • ei- 4 ....., ...,,,.. ,, -- coi Fa DT.%• 1 '67cP:' .. '5 ! . r'. - e •• I/-,'''• •".".- 'ili : , „,., • e . •, • , , 4Z, , : •-..0._ , e,e.,,2.•,,'e I. e•• *I.-- ... -•• e .. • i •-• -- • r e w• . .. Oct t i -6 e ie.ca.4•„ . . .: ' • - -- •-„op.. . 1 . e ...e. /e:•_,. . i ,..•.. , i',.67,7•• •-! e cosd.e,),...ei• .e.,;,........ .,A..1s,.. ........,....,... ...; :. .. .,....., . , \ . . . v : ‘,../ef , • , . ...,• , .. . .G.... •••••iii; • . • .i ' •', :t .:*:r. . . , • •'-7: / / 0 8 .' • 1.5. 41 .... .. , , . I •• • / 4 ••'e 1.n .1.. e• ‘.... *. ,• \ .,ev 1':ii .. N. (1 . e` ; . - e . 2, e ' '• '.... ?..e •• • /A . /..r. fre• •,-%-;•-ec;G'e ''''3, .. ..... .... *II:. 12.. q.`,,.4,:.—, ,i i : , . , . - . .-." . 0: e' np___I . . / /,•//4./'/•/•/'/•,s.1•I 1•,• .. \C-s e./eg•'.--::.•1:.7.4.Gb'••t,e%•'••i--•-.fa-'•-••.•e..e:l ee-e\-e*i':•e;,,''-',..,•'.-'.e'•'•i•.•'c.e•.'e'a.'.•.,..'ee.Y.„:•.'''''•4•:,,°-'3,.a,,,,..e>.•,e..k..-/,%..0."•.0-r....k 4.:.,.:.f..!,,s C'r•r!.ac.•;-',-4P;P°e•0 e—X-•.-e..'.'••_.'t'::.'..,.,Cf.e1e..3;re.1•.—'o•:l.i7 i.3'%..7.!!'-.e.'•.):0..,'..4.,.'-.••::0f,\0..'3••.•.,•.1''_1.-t-,"*2•1:k'•...r0.1•.i.1 fi.*.;.•„•../2t7•:•61t.,-'.•.1:,••••,1oi,0t/.;;/•.•-)',O,4,-•.:9-.S.5.;•.ec1„.•012,'O3,.•.....,4:e.,-1•.-.;'../.,..•i,,.1.1,.:..!.'p.It!1,,,,S.•0,."e,.••0°.I,,.'ft,.•.1„•.,0..,•.."°,,;..16,'61;.;!.1.,•Vh-:Z.%t:,.•,.1i.%4'\t:1.2.1 o.‘•1.*e'11....*i.•9,„a'.'',,..•,•.",e.•\`l.,..:.',.'.\.•t:y•e,-.s•1.-••‘A-'..t`•2'.,e:•,,.,'‘:x,e:.',1\•,.•,s'".-:'.•....7..-•...i!••-..•-4(i‘e..•,.3-.,'-.•......e..%.:t,.e.:.a•.‘.-...,. % * -•....,•---i,.'..,`-,..',-..-;-:e-.*,e•.,..e-i..•-...-,-e'„-..:;..,i•l ei./,..,.:., ..,••-.;•,t-2-..a'e-1•:.•,.•-...-•,.•\•9•••--,.','•.---•.e--t,r.--3•'.•.•'e:4.a.4••0,,.• ,:-.••-:.•-•e,.•- ' / ' . . ' pt e / . 4 - e•.i•-e t•-..• .-•.-.•-•-e„e - " • ‘ .. e . - , .,.'-.•\, „-a.„„•i&s‘,e,• .e.ce.ea./s•• e e.• •-,:„e: -7! . _ 06.0 ConCtot ..f...e.loe.i et 0..''1•..t.0:.C.. ;.—: . • : , L,LMSr OYE.....S...O.oE..qi r r a Y s•Ee...:,N..Lr s ROLLflGKRr_k T OtfNP ....S..!T"AT PROIETVERALL SITE PLAN 1 . 0,01 City of Seattle Paul Schell, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities JEVELOPMcNT PLANNIi�� Diana Gale,Director CITY OF RENTON SEA' ,F 1999 September 24, 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager City of Renton, Dev. Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Land Use Number: LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF Application Name: Rolling Hills Reservoir Project Location: 2400 Puget Drive SE Applicant: City of Renton; Water Utilities Dear Ms. Nishihira: The City of Seattle has a major water pipe line in Puget Drive SE and adjacent to the above referenced/proposed project. Please keep The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Utilities informed of your facility as construction continues and particularly as it may affect the Seattle water pipe line. Thank you. Very truly yours, .fit r^`f erry R. Crawford Seattle Public Utilities Dexter Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1709 206/684-5989 Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTY/TDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631,Internet Address:http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/utill An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer.Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. ea-M Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 September 17, 1999 Lesley Nishihira City of Renton Development Services Division O�ELOPlV9�i�1 FLANNItr : CITY OF RENTON 1055 S Grady Way SEA' z 1999 Renton, WA 98055-3232 RECEIVED RE: LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF Rolling Hills Reservoir Dear Ms.Nishihira: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Rolling Hills Reservoir,which is located at 2400 Puget Drive SE in Renton. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project will not have significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at(206) 440-4915. Sincerely, Fo2 Craig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: •LOAc V k(J i w OMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallon tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area ere a information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3, 9/0 1't79 Signatur Director r uthorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (&S- IAY--- Y ' JALI(P/o COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 Cs", APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nieljhira PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 G`C LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE 0'14 (' ''• �, SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 millKsp gallo Tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon v44ter storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. Thep t also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water, wer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7i/1 6 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C r� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 170 I ItLe, COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallon tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9-15-'1 7 Signature of Direc or or A h rized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pa,vki COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallon tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet jt,e/bcow 7-Zez)/CZ-/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS j/' 4"(27u2a/i) rzz C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7,0a,d-Z /g72/6 We have reviewed this application articular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is ne ded to properly assess this proposal. C/IS/77 Signature of Director or A 2riz Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RI I�- F� / HEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—C- SADOkrWi _y COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 . PP 2 l 'tags APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesle§Wif1>i*i*a1(a Q[\ $,fN PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE SITE AREA: 12.97 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallon tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental(SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS !vJ .014414t1i141 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. „„( 1,-2d Aiq Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S�I tLjfLe COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 ` CA_ APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihirit. `) gyp tt PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 `r Imo` ) LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE U ,„ SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallor?nk SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storattrtank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 4 7E5c? u>ril he ✓e yu,v ( F tom, „Ivo jecz We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ale'(,, --E - 1,%6/Y' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P RKA-CW._ V' COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 Ole, APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira��,t~„ ��' c .% PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 at/ 80 �. T�� 4LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE C�,V(� f g 0j SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gaTI6b,t?n SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines,and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS fUo 61vvta. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. tc2a q//i Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT•' tV.� 2V —ham COMMENTS DUE: 9/27/99 REND FIE DEL- APPLICATION NO: LUA99-119,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 9/13/99 riprr DpI ,c ,TInni RIIRFAII APPLICANT: City of Renton,Water Utilities PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihirr J[p 1 4 i9 PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Reservoir WORK ORDER NO: 55240 LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE a t b u t i V 11J SITE AREA: 12.97 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,099 sf+3 million gallon tank SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water,sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 9 14,000 Feet 4,1 O //\J j/0 r 1:7(24 f 5 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS II / C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS S e e (2 /44,41-1,l We have review d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional information is need o properly assess this proposal. V7,5'777 Signature irector or Authorized Represen a Date devapp 1 Rev.10/93 TY O , CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 15, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ,) SUBJECT: Rolling Hills Reservoir & Pump Station, 2400 Puget Drive SE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 1500 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the Fuel Tank, alarm and any Hazardous Material Systems installations. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. �9n e. 3,/ qq9 714a), .‘u 7611f) ;4;, vale)A,00 „brito / 1-"4-e9 zaAlToy . /(zyt, .>Yri) ,A4yeee Arb )4,7a€ 142,,,) (? Jcw1Ay, ,u4t-oLP6i) ) 62-aiv aiLea). • C) 626( 7( ( 071‘0 ea,y7 (>2-e-i() e DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN' �/�� 9455 CITYOENTON SEP � �� 1999 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: .OLL10G 11\LI.S 3 M,LL,4,,i GALLa ku-sa-kva,t. Fume S o � I1 APPLICATION NO: LUA , '19 — It I-' (- The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER tiff 1�t AT-i- 1 (nA C, �% {� L— 57.YY A N D A....A. LcVELOF-"1 ;\IT• P' 'tC; CITY OF REi>, (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) PID Owner Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 202305905103 SEATTLE CITY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER DEPT 710 2ND AVE 9TH FL SEATTLE WA 98104 202305905200 UNITED STATES BONNEVILLE PWR SUB STA 0 202305906309 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SO RENTON WA 98055 202305906608 PUGET SOUND ENERGYIELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 202305906705 UNITED CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1707 EDMONDS AVE SE 00479-001 RENTON WA 98055 202305906796 UNITED CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1707 EDMONDS AVE SE 00479-001 RENTON WAS 98055 202305910400 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 202305910905 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 212305904204 UNITED STATES BONNEVILLE PWR SUB STA 0 684300011005 ROBERTS R J 1700 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98058 _ _ _ 684300012003 SALVATORE MARILYN J 1624 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98058 684300013001 PATCH DANIEL R+KELLI C 1616 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98056 684300014009 OTTILIE CUFTON J 2509 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98055 684300026003 TAYLOR GARY C+DIANE K 1709 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98058 684300027001JONES WILBUR DEAN+MERLE FLO 1701 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98058 684300028009'RITUALO JUNE E 1633 EDMONDS WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 684300029007i BADISSY ZINE A PO BOX 1434 RENTON WA 98055 684300030005 FISHER GINGER L 14702 SE RENTON-ISSAQUAH RD RENTON WA 98055 084300035004'M UN KAM+HOY PUM+PUM HAI+SIM 2508 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98058 789910007007 MENDEZ JOSEPH C 2000 SE 16TH CT REDMOND WA 98055 739910008005 MENDEZ JOSEPH C _ 2006 SE 16TH COURT RENTON WA 98055 739910009003 MENDEZ JOSEPH C 2006 SE 16TH COURT RENTON WA 98055 739910010001 MENDEZ JOSEPH C 13817 171ST AVE NE REDMOND WA 98052 739910011009 VILLASISTA CINDY L 2008 SE 16TH CT RENTON WA 98055 739910012007 ALLYN EVELYN E 2010 SE 16TH COURT ROLLING HILLS RENTON WA 98055 _ 739910013005 PRELESNIK UNDA J 1601 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 739910014003 APELES MARJORIE A 1603 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 _ _ 739910015000 IGOE CAROLYN J 1805 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 739910016008 SMITH CINDY L+KIRBY L 1607 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 739910017006 BERGSTROM CAMELIA L 19019 196TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 739910018004 HARRISON JULIA L 1400 HUBBELL PL 6607 SEATTLE WA 98101 739910019002 NEYERS MICHAEL 1613 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 _ 739910020000 THOMAS CLEMENTINE 1600 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 739910021008 MCCART STEVEN R+SUSAN G 1602 BLAINE CT SE RENTON WA 98055 739910022006 ROLLING HILLS VILLAGE HOMES BOX 656 RENTON WA 98055 739920086009 ROLLING HILLS VILLAGE HOMES PO BOX 656 RENTON WA 98055 739930056000 RICHARDS TERRI 2205 BLAINE CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930057008 WIERTELLA R J 1907 SE CAMAS CT RENTON WA 98055 739930068005 GRINZEL PAUL S 1904 CAMAS COURT SE RENTON WA 98055 739930107001 PARMACEK BRETT A 10212 NE 68TH ST B-202 KIRKLAND WA 98033 739930108009 WILUAMS LOVITA A PO BOX 60062 RENTON WA 98058 739930109007 WILLIAMS TERRY L __ 2308 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 739930110005 MAKI CALVIN CARL 2300 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 739930111003 CHEUNG CHESTER 2232 SE 19TH RENTON WA 98055 739930112001 RINGUEN JOHN 2224 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055__ 739930113009 OLSEN SHERRIL T 2216 CAMAS CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930114007 KOL.KE RAYMOND.CRYSTAL 2212 CAMAS CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930115004 SZABOVA FRANK 2208 CAMAS CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 _ 739930116002 OAKES GARY D+CHARLENE F %2204 CAMAS CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930117000 KUNNANZ STEVEN C- -- - 2200 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 - - - 739930118008 BOUNDS LORA A 2124 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 739930119006 CRABS ARTHUR L 2118 SE 19TH ST RENTON WA 98055 - 739930120004 BRIERLEY JOHN+KRISTINE Y 1814 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930121002 VANDERSTUYFT JOHAN 1808 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930122000 OKUMA RODNEY M+VERONICA 1802 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930123008 BERGMANN ROBERT 3321 NE PEERLESS PL PORTLAND OR 97232 739930124006 WHEATLEY JOE E MURIE WHEATLEY DEBRA J 1725 ABERDEEN AV SE RENTON WA 98055 739930125003 TEODORO DEE MURIE 1733 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930126001 HAYDON DELI 1801 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 739930127009 PULLMAN GERALD S&BETH S 2940 ABBOTTSWELL DR ALPHARETTA GA 30202 739930128007 BURLILE JOHN O+CONNIE S 1813 ABERDEEN AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 864550038003 POPOWSKI JEROME B&LAURA A 1509 FERNDALE AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 864550039001 BASCO MATTHEW J 1517 FERNDALE AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 864550041007 KNUTSON ROGER A 2548 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98055 884550042005 BLAIR DALE H 2542 SE 16TH RENTON WA 98055 864550043003 STECHER DAVID C 1514 BEACON WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 664550044001 ZERR JEFFREY L 1508 BEACON WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 864550138001 PAYNE DALE R+KAREN M 2543 SE 16TH ST RENTON WA 98058 Camwr rb on ale above application must b din writingb M Ms.Lesley Nlsira,Project Manager,Development tir�Y Services DMsion,1055 South Grady Way. WA 95055,by 5:00 PM on September 27,Mt If you have U questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mai,contact the Protect Manager.Anyone who submits written comments w5 automatically become a Party of record and will be notified of any decision on Nis project �.'N'CO� CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 NOTICE OF APPLICATION I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: September 13,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-a9-119,SA-A,ECF ;LB ,' •m APPLICATION NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir ='.At' . RC R-14 i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million �_ - 4� gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station,the installation of a p R-8 _ R_14 550-gallon fuel storage tank,water.sewer and drainage lines,and a containmenUstorm water detention pond. The D a6D — ,r --I proposed lank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir.The project will require extensive D RC - �� - grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental(SEPA)Review and Administrative Site �♦� • ..••• - 'n ♦' Plan Approval. - 0-1 t 1, . A, ,�fo PROJECT LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE RM-1 r-G - • �A-�.-•tP%d�I�'fie a•U�a., ��7��V, • ^ O - �h.WVV+_attyV:•hexi i� V. 1:� OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS):As the Lead Agency,Use City of Renton has determined a fiWrt VV .jeea� - that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the .,o a•��eft Ap�4:' yb I e dr4l RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. .i SP aaaei •. c . • u• Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no ��'nab- P-1 ♦� �� P P 1 P P e9 9 Pe S tSth � i d comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14 day appeal V ;:4aay ♦♦4 _ - 8 .1 e'♦ P 9 9 ( ) Y PPe F rs e..L,.as ♦ ♦� I 446,4 , r♦ period will follow the issuance of the DNS. • _ PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 1,1999 'AV ,�*♦♦♦l.seem••,�,s'1 ._A�'!=jrir-' A esry� NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 13,1999 Cl.taP ♦♦,eo.e•"••• : �♦ -�, , assa �4LA,, ♦ li ig APPLICANT: City of Renton:Water Utilities I Q 0 0. ��e'aarilW �Viane .•. e / :aaa �►....T.4 n ae*a:r1.'aa:='�♦ rd:�. •Iaaaa^� :.y. R e:e- r ,�� . - tL a:S a:e:�.a..:�.�.:•e vL1 OWNER: City of Rentoncii. R -l��arinums�:• 11M it i �n ..• I LIi IJ'II ♦\ Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval rr \ _r e �N in m 'lUu t:j I j Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits "m --M I ' •r ' m • Requested Studies: Geolechnical Report,Drainage Report . Location where application may • be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department 1055 South Grady Way.Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated Public Use(P-1)on the City's Zoning Map and Residential Single Family on the Ciys Comprehensive Plan Lend Use Map.The proposal is considered a'municipal utility facility and is consistent with both designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None known. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. . Proposed Mitigation Measures: _ At this time,the analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions.However,further evaluation may reveal the need for additional mitigation measures. GexnaW Gonna. CERTIFICATION I, Le4 k9 N i.hih Y�. , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in --.3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Mo-r Ao y cp 131 1q6/I T. Signed: )i7/(1 7)7)). --2_5 ' ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for-A State of Washington residing i �a-c -» , on the 3O7'k. day of;arid (qq 9 , ; NrARILYN CHEFF Gam},, " Z NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF 1 COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JUNE 29, 2003 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: September 13,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton P/B/PW Department is proposing to construct a 3 million gallon water storage tank on City owned property in order to eliminate a deficit of water storage for the City's water distribution system. The project also includes the construction of a 2,099 square foot pump station, the installation of a 550-gallon fuel storage tank, water, sewer and drainage lines, and a containment/storm water detention pond. The proposed tank will be located directly adjacent to the existing 300,000-gallon reservoir. The project will require extensive grading and the removal of existing trees. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 2400 Puget Drive SE • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 1, 1999 SI / NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 13,1999 ✓ APPLICANT: City of Renton;Water Utilities OWNER: City of Renton, Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated Public Use(P-1)on the City's Zoning Map and Residential Single Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposal is considered a"municipal utility facility'and is consistent with both designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None known. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: At this time,the analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However,further evaluation may reveal the need for additional mitigation measures. Genmalot CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 13, 1999 To: J.D. Wilson From: Lesley Nishihira Ur'k� Development Planning Subject: Rolling Hills Reservoir Project No. LUA-99-119,SA-A,ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has received the above-referenced application for environmental review. A presentation to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is scheduled for September 28,1999. Following the ERC meeting, I will send you copies of the ERC determination along with the timeframes for the public comment and appeal periods for your files. acptmemo 4,.. *t •-11•4- t ti.,i ,II „\It. , I 1111; , I i I . , A ( F( c i. i.11t ,.i) iil • r ' ',• . PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. Z. „, PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, ;,,; t� herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured ,r -n• , 4 �'r named Sche A, ma in the land in describeddule or referredasowner to inor Schedule ortggee A, uponofthe payment estate or of theinterest premiums andcovered charges '"'11"_ ,.,-Y I.- therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and !� t '•� , Stipulations hereof. , 1. +. • This Commitment shall he effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and ` ,, the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof .,, N by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. :1 ` .,+ • This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the \. effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the , Company. .k,,,,,,;=` .,. Signed under seal for the Company, but this Commitment shall not be valid or binding c'` until it bears an authorized Countersignature. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Pacific Northwest Title Insurance Company, Inc. has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date : :, shown in Schedule A. 4 L w • r } 'r, f:*%lik% " * { r"" PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Insurance Company, Inc. �; i f. y a A t t"' `\\`001iiimunnuiii000 . '' President . �, `�,,‘1�E INSU9 Countersigned by: e:oc.13.0..R.A.T.E-7.4.:4:,c.:::-i::::-• v r 1 ►.� + ' = c : 3 = Autftorizec�Signatory ` ' •' , ry SEAL == j - ,, ,, ; t v 1926 2, , Company • ., - 'v LE 0 ,1'1SHINGAW's '-'i 4. 1u1 :i._i } + City State ..` P y µ 5 •, ; . American Land Title Association Commitment- 1966 (Rev 3/78) PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622-1040 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT TO: City of Renton/Planning/ Your Reference No. : 55240 Building/Public Works Our Order No. : 388171 1055 Grady Way Supplemental No. : 1 Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Tom Boyns/Abdoul Gafour The following matters affect the property covered by this order: * The vesting has been amended to read as follows: CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation * The legal description has been amended to read as follows: That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said subdivision; thence south 01°50'38" west along the east margin of said subdivision 646.62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 88°09'22" west 30 feet; thence south 46°50'38" west 766.92 feet along the northwesterly margin of property deeded to The First Christian Church under Recording Number 5615593; thence north 43°09'22" west 561.35 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly margin of Puget Drive Southeast; thence north 40°00'05" west along said southeasterly margin 522.57 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said southeasterly margin on a curve to the right having a radius of 416 .87 feet a distance of 690.27 feet; thence continuing along said margin a distance of 46.67 feet to the easterly line of said subdivision; thence south 01°50'38" west along said easterly margin 280.88 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. (continued) Z00/T0Ot1 ai1T,L MN 3TJTDEd ZT ,LINII 0££T £V£ 90Z %Vd L6:9T 66/T£/80 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT Page 2 Order No. 388171 * The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 8 * The following note has been amended to read as follows: NOTE 3: The vestee herein acquired title by instrument recorded under Recording Numbers 5967605 and 8310280600. * Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined. Dated as of August 31, 1999 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Mike Sharkey Title Officer CG/1715L 7nni7nn aT1TI AN 3TJT°Ed ZT LINII 0££T C6£ 90Z XVd L6:9T 66/T£/80 7,32 WARRANTY DEED • to TI-IE GRANTOR, PUGET WESTERN, INC. , a Washington corporation, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby : acknowledged, conveys and warrants to the City of Renton, a f • Municipal corporation, of the State of Washington, the following Er_ 1,, described real estate in the City of Renton, King County, "'T�'' . .1 Washington. J4�c �[;6",0,49 ,, ' C � r6% Or--no " 3 North Reservoir Site 0196 That portion of the Southeast of Sec. 20, 23 N. , R. 5 E. , W.M. described as follows: Beginning • �=d at the northeast corner of said subdivision; thence � S O1°50' 38" W. , along the easterly limits of said subdivision, a distance of 646.62 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N 88°09'22" W., a distance of 30.00 feet; thence S 46°50'38" W. , a distance of • 766.92 feet along the northwesterly margin of the First Christian Church property as recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 5615593; thence N 43°09'22" W. , a distance of 561.35 feet to a point on the south- easterly margin of Puget Drive as recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 5801096; thence N 40°00'05" E. • along said southeasterly margin, a distance of 522.57 feet 'iks to a point of curve; thence continuing along said south- easterly margin on a curve to the right having a radius of 416.87 feet, an arc distance of 690.27 feet;thence • continuing along said margin S. 45°07'35" E. , a distance of 46.67 feet to a point on the easterly limits of said subdivision; thence S 01°50'38" W. , a distance of 280.88 feet along said easterly limits to the true point of beginning. • Containing 12.97 acres,more or less. Subject to existing restrictions, reservations and encum- z brances of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instru- ment to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this 18th day of November , 1965. PUGET WESTERN, IlC. • • ItY nt tt•:;t . tllt_,,__Ergli!1e tt: — ---- By--c Its . l' — Leslie M. Nishihira From: John D. Wilson To: Jennefer Toth Henning; Leslie M. Nishihira Cc: Abdoul Gafour; Lys Hornsby; Thomas G. Boyns Subject: Rolling Hills Title Report Date: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 2:26PM Priority: High Jennefer / Leslie: The title report provided by Pacific Northwest Title to the Water Utility for the Rolling Hills property is incorrect. They missed the Warranty Deed (#5967605) which transferred the property to the City. The tile company has been notified and said it will be providing a new title report. FYI: A warranty deed transferred the 1 2.97 acres from Puget Western to the City of Renton on 18 November 1965. (King County file # 5967605). On 18 October 1983 the eastern 30 feet were transferred from Puget Western to the City of Renton via a quit claim deed (King County file # 8310280600). Please proceed with processing the SEPA and Site Approval Application. I will provide you with the replacement (corrected) title report as soon as I receive it from Pacific NW Title. Thanks. J.D. Page 1 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 1999 TO: J.D.Wilson;Water Utility FROM: Lesley Nishihira; Development Services SUBJECT: Rolling Hills Reservoir File No. LUA-99-119, SA-A, ECF Thank you for submitting the title report for the above referenced project application. In addition to the City of Renton, the report references Puget Western, Inc. as holding interest in the property. In order to accept this application as complete and initiate the review of the proposal, we will need a Master Application form signed and notarized by an authorized representative of Puget Western. A document granting you authorization to sign on their behalf would also be acceptable. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at x7270. I will be on vacation from September 1st through the 10 h. You may also contact Jennifer Henning at x7286 if you need immediate assistance during this time. Thank you. ts,0# PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 04 ,x/4 N4" 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 15 Seattle, Washington 98101 4 Senior Title Officer, Mike Sharkey { O O Assistant Title Officer, Curtis Goodman ` Unit No. 12 FAX Number 206-343-1330 �` Telephone Number 206-343-1327 City of Renton/Planning/Building/ Public Works 1055 South Grady Way Title Order No. : 388171 Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Tom Boyns Customer Ref. : 55240 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: August 17, 1999, at 8 :00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: A. ALTA Owner's Policy Amount TO BE AGREED UPON Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium Tax (8 .6%) Proposed Insured: TO FOLLOW NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. B. ADDITIONAL WORK CHARGES Amount $310.00 Tax (8.6%) $ 26.66 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation, as to the east 30 feet; and PUGET WESTERN, INC. , a Washington corporation, as to the remainder 4 . The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. Order No. 388171 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said subdivision; thence south 01°50 '38" west along the east margin of said subdivision 646 .62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 88°09'22" west 30 feet; thence south 46°50 '38" west 766. 92 feet along the northwesterly margin of property deeded to The First Christian Church under Recording Number 5615593; thence north 43°09'22" west 561.35 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly margin of Puget Drive Southeast; thence north 40°00 '05" west along said southeasterly margin 522 .57 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said southeasterly margin on a curve to the right having a radius of 416.87 feet a distance of 690.27 feet; thence continuing along said margin a distance of 46 .67 feet to the easterly line of said subdivision; thence south 01°50' 38" west along said easterly margin 280.85 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65. 04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. NE1/4, SE1/4, 20-23-05 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 388171 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II . Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. Order No. 388171 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. FORMAT: MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS ONLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OF NO MORE THAN 8 1/2" BY 14" . NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR WITHIN THE UPPER LEFT HAND 3" MARGIN. TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OF SUBJECT DEED OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR(S) AND GRANTEE(S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . (continued) Order No. 388171 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (continued) : 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: King County Water District No. 58 PURPOSE: For the construction, maintenance and operation of the following described facility: One six inch water main AREA AFFECTED: Easterly portion of said premises RECORDED: January 24, 1962 RECORDING NUMBER: 5379116 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Electric line right-of-way and the perpetual right to construct, reconstruct, improve, repair, maintain and operate one or more electric transmission and/or distribution lines, consisting of poles or towers with necessary braces, guys and anchors, crossarms, insulators, transmission, distribution and signal wires, transformers and other necessary or convenient facilities and equipment AREA AFFECTED: Westerly 15 feet of easterly 35 feet of said premises RECORDED: December 3, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5670974 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Washington Natural Gas Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: For a two inch gas line and the perpetual right to construct, reconstruct, improve, repair, maintain and operate same on said premises AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises RECORDED: August 7, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 5771386 (continued) Order No. 388171 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 4 . The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 202305-9109-05 NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 5 . Matters disclosed on a survey of the herein described property recorded under King County Recording Number 9606039001, a copy of which is hereto attached. We note said survey contains an incomplete legal description. 6. Right, title and interest of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation as disclosed by the King County Assessor's Tax Roll as to that portion of said premises vested in Puget Western, Inc. 7. Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of City of Renton. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1. 78%. 8. Evidence of the identity and authority of the officers of Puget Western, Inc. , a Washington corporation to execute the forthcoming instrument must be submitted. 9. Satisfactory showing of authorization for the proposed conveyance by City of Renton, a municipal corporation, in accordance with applicable statutes must be submitted. 10. Until the amount of the policy to be issued is provided to us, and entered on the commitment as the amount of the policy to be issued, it is agreed by every person relying on this commitment that we will not be required to approve any policy amount over $100, 000, and our total liability under this commitment shall not exceed that amount. (continued) Order No. 388171 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 5 NOTE 1: Our examination discloses that the vestee herein does not own any contiguous property. NOTE 2 : The name and address of the current taxpayer according to the King County Assessors record is: City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 NOTE 3: The vestee herein acquired title by instrument recorded under Recording Numbers 5626312 and 8310280600. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Mick Foley Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. MCF/pjn/1715L • II • J *, I372.56 �i ...%,p , 0.+---:;;;;7---- � 11 p Id o`'" ..-• r, E ESMT• ` P'` Z .�T 13 ' 7,,a:85.2 0 \t 111-1 ,�z�— I70 I '' t lea� ,ii r + +� AAI r • �, 1'7`�, TRACT A 9' • P tA \ P t " ,,, irt,G \\- R , Q. .+ ' I N ..q ~` ® O d , 9,0\••• "-Xi%CI tt y6. P • < , \Y ,r+r.a roe c . •N......N., J ^^ 'y 5 4 Q G T 1� tj Y°°', i i q1 ,. 1 ° vi s /1t i, t7 y U >°'e : Pv'04 +\ I: y. t : i Js h0 /2! - 'it • y A +' tma.c ? . lr„.ts. < 4 P.' ,1� .• r r 1 ^ 12� J � Iy �I " 9 .i +i 15 s . /r I y • • ° „ ,, .,... .. 4, , 4.!!_...-;;-;9/ c, li \ Jr ~A j z z.// fe; s e Z • In S ' .04 , _ ` .;.lit -DO—�— z_`�'M 0o i_I,� a t �` n 14 s SST TITLE c olvi.P� N j�ACIFIC N oRTH A Order Ivo. �c.4_\ IPORTANT: This is not a eruence to Plat of Survey It is furnished as a cony No liability locate tN on with reference to streets and other lan the land indicated here L.. ,:t con of reliance hereon. 1 14G `OpENT ON . D� r OF R f " ,r . y";A G �K. L4 QuiD s' � : 'ti . CrThe yr,\ Pj � _Oh v LIG '._ C0M?l�Ts , a et i�` ' •• 'T ,iP• 1.fhL��Yi nsi a tion of Ten Dollars i �• r r_' _ corporation, for and in consideration cra + 1-.j �. Washington L . ($10.00) in hand paid, and other good and valuable considerations, .. rv: ' x. $ .. recei::t o_ which is hereby acknowledged, 'r.ereal conve.s and • s" ^r:_ntee, subject to the en- � 3�'. * E'- PROPERTIES, IBC• 2 warrants to PUGET ter ,`'� '�" y%= and rem fictions hereinafter •'ti ¢:�.; reservations, conditic.... -- ` wlt a cumbrances, :,ert situated inthe b✓.r '' iw,l, . . set forth, the following described :al prc1c� ..ti (5 of Washington:King, State I r ;%'% City of Renton, County of U!. {u "v.,- The legal description is ,-elineated in sheets 1 _�.•_,,>., - E:rni�it A +y-"ri.t.Y`,` through 10 of Area Maas attached hereto as hereto xo-_- • Sheets 1 through 3 of L_scrinti�ns attached '-' :7" and -n } c 1 h}11.', rCiC::+! 1tJn; •.t.i, t U and wade a part It reo . b I ; _ -• Containing 515 acres, or ' or less. Subject to all easements, restrictions and rF-:;erva- r> ; }; and t:� all Exceptions cor.•_ained ?^: •. tiors of record: if any, and , •r--�= and 2 of the list c Exceptions attached hereto -� as Exhibit C rages 1 _�ference. I - nd .de a part hereof by this ,+:. WITNESS WHEREOF Grantoz has caused this instrument IN WI _,r SS _ - t and its coresorate se to i . . +-.o he executed by its grope.. officers day of Augusta 1953. be hereunto affi::.d this 19 , PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY *:• `: : By� 4� 1. -►-y (SEAL) --y-- - Ralph M. Davis , as its President . i Attest: - ;t ..U. 1'. . • • 4/ Dv/•.? I •.rw • ic 1 1 rL`i£ EXHIBIT "B" •s r FROPERT:' DESCRIPTION - I ri •: t i j =2 PARCEL t: - That portion of Government Lots 3 and 5 in Section 16, Township 23, North, Range 5 East W.M.,ilying Southerly of Pacific Coast Railroad Company (formerly C+lumbia }, N and Puget Sound Railroad Company) right of way; (See Note) Exta ri that portion },f ••. lying East of the Cedar River. I4. f PARCEL 2t e. That portion of Government Lot 9 in Se:Cron 17, Tovnsbip 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. lying Southerly of Pacific Coast Railroad Company (formerly Columbia and Puget Sound aAt Railroad Company) right of way; (See icte) PARCEL 3: ge That portion of the Southeast 4 of ',he Northeast oof Section 19, Township 23 North Range 5 East W.M. lying South and East s" 3t:.._ nigh , -- -cf way; EXCEPT :: .. . .. Road; (See Note) , .�y" PARCEL 4: = :r Tracts 73, 74, 75, 76 and 77 of Plat No. 2 of Renton Cc-Operative Coal Company's 4,. r Acre Tracts, as per plat recorded in volume 9 of Plats, page 27, records of King ` '- • . County; (See Note) PARCEL 5: That portion of the Southwest , of th. Northeast - of Section 20, Township 23 North i • Range 5 East W.M., lyirg Northerly of Bonneville Powe:- ':iministrstion Zalment and Southerly of Cit.: of Seattle Transmissiod Line right of way; ,•%r ALSO that rortio. of the Northwest ,, cf the Northeast of said Section 20, lying Northerly of Puget Sound Power & Light Company Transmission Line, Southerly of Arnold Park in C'ty of Renton, and Westerly of City of Seattle Pipe Line Right cf Way; ALSO that po:-tio:4 of the Northwest ,i—, of the Northeast ,i—, of said Section 20 lying • Northeasterly of City of Seattle Pipe Line Right of Way, Northerly of Puget Sound Power & Light Company Transmission Line; EXCEPT the North 250 feet of the Fast• • 400 feet thereof; ALSO that portion of the Northeast of the Northeast a of said Section 20, lying Northerly of Puget Sound Power & Light Company Transmission Line Right of Way; EXCEPT any portions for County Roads; (See Note) • i - I • I i i I i ' I ' Exhibit "B" - 2 1r,',. Description (continued) P •C L o: East W.M.; EXCEPi' i ...:1? 41. S margin of City of Seattle I :t '1 of th Southeast of Section o20f �he Township Southwesterly North,3 Range ,ki P ion lying Northeasterly EXCEt'T the portion conveyed to the first Christian Church, �-, �qY Pipe Line Right of Way; and EXCEPT the Weat 260 feet Inc., under deed bearing Auditor's File No. 5615593; Iir ^' `. of the East 930 feet of the South 200 feet of the Southeast of the Southeast ~1 of said Section 20; (See Note) -t.. r PARCEL � < �,.� Township 23 *TT North, �nment Lot 1 in Section 20, �;-•,a1;,.. That portion of the East Sly feet of l y State Highway No. 1 right of �*-- North, Range 5 East W.M., lying Easterlyof ?r=-gar. way; South and West of C:F r�5s 1 r • BSou 32,and West r Crc'. ALSO that portion of the H. H. Tobin Donation Land Clain lying �>_�.�,. r plat recorder' ' 7 ' -,T*: ofgn Addition,a, as upe of King County, and South of the South tine of said Addition produced East; pr„ onion of the North 778 E„- pro 1 1 Easterly of the John Benson Road (State . t. ALSO Government Lot 2 in said Section 20; EXCEPT t p IT: : of the West 4'7, feet thereof, Y ` .r .,,.�.G.,,. ;+.tt.. Fr,rhu,•.•� rights of way; � r. ;j..:C;_C:: . : .,•...�.. .'. : Right of .rr- o7 . or-. :: ': - ___. or _cc`., .-". g _o "_T ..i_:2-.._.'...... _. .�, �,a.^ 'in-.,,; �', A1.:•r� that portion • . Ens -;of the We : ' ;'ht O': i East of t'rc 47es _ar31a o� S�a.tl^ Cit: , T. :, I ; lino �f said �ea..t�e City I i king Southerly cf a line drawn from a point on the West }y"^ ' line cf said Government I : Light Right of Way which is 100 feet N 'rth of the South feet fest of Government intersection -�ti;'_ Lot 3, to a point on the South line thereof Rc�tao3'Way; (See Note) with the West lit: of said Seattle Cit. Light '!! i :, 1. Y:•_ • i 1 i . PARCEL 8' East =-.e Southwest u of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 Eact That portion of W.'�., .,inS ;;est_.1y of the John F. Beason County Road (State High i f the Southwest of t>e ;outhwe t 4 of said I ALSO that :�crtio_ of the Esser Z o� 11- _ I Section 20 lying East of Benson Road and of the Sout:heastc3 of the Southwest -,i- of ' i said Section 20, lying Northerly of the following des-_'-b Road at the intersection of the Northeasterly line o' the B nsonaCo my Ro 1 withnting thence with the South line of said Section 20; thence Northwesterly, of said line; ; - 4.6 feet to the true point of beginning Nosthr87 road "l E , 734.63 North 87°3l'40" East to the North and South center line ofhisivife,tundern O; EXCEPT Contt that portion acid to Ross 0. Kirkham and Dora W. Kirkham,Auditor's File No. 1890288;Ct recorded in Volume 1245 of Deeds, on page 208,ie E. itor'r DFil bNo. 18 p� r let portion431 0conveyed, eorded in Volume 1 8 1oyDeeds, page 119; ' Auditor's File No. 2431602, ' ' I , I- • 1962 ti . 1 _ ,i,w`4?, 3 1. �i tion (continued) _ hr:, r', L�esc. P � � �t.4a= ALSO that portion of the Southeast : of the Southeast ,i-, of the Southwest 4 of said , Section 20, lying Northeasterly of Bonneville Power Administration, Covington - r• enton Line No. 2 "^M ALSO the Northeast of the Southwest - of said Section 20; MEP: the huh er » �{Ct.c't that portion conveyed to Prosper Ethier by Deed bearing Audit- ors 3:. County F{ Road; 0 recorded in Volume ii4 7 of Deeds, page 63; =EFT fir" pos n_ No. yed335 , I I ` portion conveyed to Joe Savio by Deed bearing Auditor's File No. 2304821, recorded iI ,^, ��,e h6 AND 'EXUn 1 that portion conveyed to Nazaire �. :.?1 inEt Volumey d3 d ofe Deeds, page 3 5; No. 823, recorded in Volume 1656 of Deeds Ethier by deed bearing Auditor's File 28; iiFx page 3.o; i;,'?' -: : ALSO that portion of the Northwest ,, of the :authwest :.- of said Section 20, lying 3 tir: wE No. 5-C); E`CFc r' :thier County ^p,-^u"xtilyv. Easterly of John Benson County Road (State Highway o �5- TEthie Audit- I "` y Fro.. 1 Road; AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to e' (See Note) Viz- or's File No. 2074850, recorded in Volume 12 1 of Deeds, peg 558; kt, i, . 71.[ F17Y PARC%L i t+ 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East ~'?.;%,: The Northwest �, of the Northwest a of Sectioni �• 1the South 100 feet of W.M.;1 EXCEPT St a No. ;-C ; and EJ��.her Sc' Lennon Road (State Highway )' the Fast 100 feet thereof; I ALSO the Southwest i of th e Northwest II, of said Section 29, E{Cr.F'1 the North 100 of • East 1CO feet thereof; :' feet the _ 3.,.: :; :,_••.,:,.. of th, e 1 r the -:orthwest cf said Section 29, lying ALSO that portion Northeast of ; (State 5-• EXCEPT the South 100 feet thereof ' ! ;-,: Westerly of Benson Road Highway No. C); $�;.^_ :-,.;,-e (measured along the 'des-: line of said subdiv-sion), (See Not_) f f2;:wr.:;.�-. �-:�:: PARCEL 10: .,. That portion of the Southeast - of the Northeast L of Section 30, Township 23 North ` Range 5 East W.M., 1yi n 3 Easterly of John Langston Road No. 80 (Talbot Road); ..... ALSO that portion of t`_e North z of the Northeast 1 of said Sction nd30,t lying angles) Easterly of a line drawn parallel to and 340 feet easterly ( e Talbot Road; AND - from the easterly margin of Primary Stat_P ter Highway No. 5; "::.s } EXCEPT that portion of the North i of said Northeast of the Northeast g, lying ; I r Easterly of Talbot Road; (See Note) YrE: FACIPT from all of the above parcels any portion within the operatingrop BoertiAdain- or the easements owned by Puget Sound Power & Light Company, on thearea daps intention, or Seattle City Light, as said areas show cros n Bonneville numbered 1 through 10 inclusive, which is carried as "Exhibit A" in the deed from Puget Sound Power & Light Company to Puget Properties, Inc. and attached hereto; I • ALL situated in the County of King, State of Washington. i • • i I Fj�.7• - czP' IONS7'',Ip.i.;'';'4, v+ i F .LAM 4. propertyherein described = `.7'Z'',:' � . "': List o`. Encumbrances y� t toPacific_`ic TeLep gene and T^Le- "•`�;,"-4' 'NI= right of way granted ac 16ele- , H'` ;'.u"M`x I. Easement for _o _1 , o• ' : ;graph Company by instrument recorded under Auditor's F..rs. I ' . . FJhich record is made for further o rt^ re .erence to G way granted to Pacific Telephone and Tele- I =T 2. Easement: for right cl graph Company by instrument recorded ::nder Auditor's File No. 1708427, I -.7 iN, a which record is made for further particulars. =• r•, •;;. reference to ,,^'• ' = maintain, repair and operate a I A4r-c �• 3, Easement hate to construct, reccnstruc_, ; '. . granted to the C•_ :y of Seattle, a zunicipa L torpor- i r. .,.:: 60 inch water pipe, s File ]';o. 3`�120�1, reference. i ',:'!,;:4�.• 7ditors 1 �4': by instrument recorded under r:.- VV.<. _o which record is made for further :articulars. >:-} 5 �..0 grant to Peyton M. Fa r M',. a. Easement for road 20 feet in wid: ,�o• 39'3270, reference to rr. .: ;,a;�„,. ....�..' '�•v:e by instrument recorded under Auditor s rile is made f:;r further oar•iculars. i r.� :which record ,;�.;. 5. -;c c:crth,•:est Pipeline I _ '. .', ' Right of gay for pipeline, grant !d to Pacit recorded underi . _ wa oration by instrumer` Corporation, a Delaware corp Auditor's -i _ :c. 4705923, refarenc _ tow which _-cord L:, made for -_,.' further particulars. " poi_ and i I :a1:.;.�._�:-:: for• :onstruct, improve, repair,to veto and to " •••-� -•= 6, Easement es••aton Natural Gas 7.3 maintain a gas dis ribution wain gralted to Washington Company, by instrument recorded ddunde= fuditor's File iieulo. 4935922, reference to which record is _ repair, and i _ 7• Easementte e:cc vote for and to construct, improve, a to Was"- ` maintain an 8 inch pipeline for tranoportation of gas grantedr i Company, by instrument recorded under Auditor's File Wash- ington Natural Gas =' No. 4959966, reference to which record is made for further particulars. o � i^one and Tele- graph ... 8. Easement for right of way granted to Pacific T_1_p . i graph Company by instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 5C30270, reference to which record is made for further particulars. o Easement for electric transmission and distribution line granted to Puget Sound Pc1'e; & Light Company by instrument recorded under Audi- tor's File No. 5173076, reference to which record is made for further particular.^.. • 10. Easement for right of way not over 5 feet wide granted to City of • Renton, a municipal corporation., by instrument recorded under ereAur ditor's�-=` File Nc 5292273, reference to which record is made 11. Easnme for right of way for the constriction. maintenance ant'. i operation Of a 12 inch water main granted to City of Renton by iti$ti:v4c.•,t 1 ; :-N :.) 1 9`� — -- --' T ` 4 1 I 1. "Exhibit " continued) -2- 14. I I a 4 reference to which record is _' recorded under Auditor's File No. 535 784, r; made for further particulars. ;::. : 12. Easement for right of way not exceeding 10 feet in width granted to Kin County Water District No. 58 for construction, maintenance and ..4 uperetion of one 6 inch water main, by instrument recorded under Audi- ; :i tor's File No. 5379116, reference to which record is made for further 4 particulars. . `: I.X.. 13. Easement for right of way •got exceeding 7.5 feet in width for the , �1 construction, maintenance and )peratien of a 12 inch sanitary sewer line - granted to City of Renton, by instrument recorded under Auditors File ;, ,. Grrther a- ._ . _a_s. iv- P No. 5524148, reference to whica _c..__ is .��• _ 4L 14. Right CO make necessary slopes for cuts or fills, as granted by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2827716, rl:ferencJ to which record is made for further particulars. �� ;�. V. 15. Relinquishment of right of access to state highway and of light, view and air, under terms of _reed to the State of Washington, recorded ' I 1962, under Auditor's File No. 537631 ). ; `a January 18, 1 �4s• 1.r!. r i \ . i 1 I 1Lil', 25 196 I +li N W''. i as - \ LO \ j I 1 PUG-? SOUND r W'' is LIGHTbPtV77, a i i sy1 .arn_'•gcn corporation, `c. and in c nsideration of One Dollar I I 4:,'s;: _ -OnG) __--_�� of Fh1Ch is j i 'y�v.sa; receipt Gr..k ($1.00) and other ralunbi oouside-^` ,,44M. �� hereby acknowledged, herei. , conveys and quitclaims to PUGEP j �� PROPERTIES, INC., a ::as in;on cep_ _at_on, Grantee, any and all 1 ; 1 by Grantor, its su5cesscrs and exceptions and reset✓atic_s } cc3- stone, oil a :, all icerals and i assfas, to all cia), , I 7 I mine ai products exist_nr n that property c.nvev,d by the Gran 3f to tf:. merit:...... Gy ,art-..,v _ c . . st 1,, 1563, t,:.. 1 recorded under KingCount, Auditor's . _l_ N . :62G312, and j c` in Dee 'Yolu e +1L3, Fazewith porting blue- I i recorded ds, - u 1 with that property conYeyed by i I ,� in the Vnu1t; �o�e-.trr - - i �ri� ! i Wad I the ;raptor to the Grantee by Warranty Deed on June 12, 1 3 I File S5y(1+�2, all in I i I recorded ender Kira County Auditor's __ No. 1 ' 1 i Irecords of King County, Washing on. ' the 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has can:ed this Instrument 1 • I _.:ted by its proper officers and corporate seal I to be e..• w Ito affixed this •..3 a t.- , '64• I ;e i:�r�un .:ems � - :.. : ...: J ' PJG7l so= _Fr...:r n is LLim. COMPANY 1 1 I •i.i�'�`: i t - - / • , �! I _ I 4 I 1 Attest: . i I I /' i .� • 1 ! :t3 ' i t I I I 1 I 1. I IrE83— 196/1 33 0 . �::•': :a 57i , ',�7 - • 1 TIIIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER USE PUGET WESTERN, INC. Filed for Record at Request of: • NAME PUGET WESTERN, INC. t ADDRESS PUGET POWER BUILDING • • CITY AND STATE_ ELLEVUE�• WA 98009 :.:EC:1 F •�1 22 • Oilit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR.PUGET WESTERN,INC.,a Washington corporation,for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable considerations OD quit claims to THE CITY OF RENTON. a municipal corporation the following described real estate,situated in the County of King State of Washington: r-( a) That portion cf the East 30 feet of the Southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , lying southerly of the southwesterly margin of the City of Seattle pipeline right of way. • 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Co. Records C vision FILED FOR FEC0;17 AT REG.UEST OF: By,1Q' i4L{dlt:..t Deputy PUGET POV:E7. ILA J:7V REAL Ese.;•a PUGET PC:'.;-r '.'%G BELLEVU'c, WASciiNGTON 98Ci09 AT EN110t1: WAYNS BRESSLER IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officer this /g'g day of 4eTo'si( . 19 83 ACCEPTED AND APPROVED PUGET WESTERN.INC CITY OF RENTON By PRESIDE,: T t • Public Work Director Vice Pr ident STATE OF WASHINGTON CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ss. COUNTY OF K On this ‘'c}ilda . O cf'c' " Q .19 83 ,before me. the undersigned,pe ' ••, ' .pearcd W. R. WATSrIN and J)1, -7+1 . ARTIIUUR ,to me known to be the nrnc idnnr and Vi r•n • I!' at. '.. . t Iy of PTIGFT WF,STFAfN, INC thecr.rporat., 4r`•'' ''.tlefor oing inst rument.and acknowledged the said instrument to be the frreand voluntary act and d• , •.,; 's,•. • 'ratldrf.(at the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that thy); Wirt) author' ••�1 w th• e';AV instrtment., !/;:.I', �, , WIT • •ti Sulpd npd of'i11 seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • 5 1 y' h . to •.,• 1 .1 ' • sae-yy Notary Public In and for the State of Washington,residing at __L, tv.vtteY ; A S E '1 E L' T L THIS INDENTURE, Made this J 7/f day of G Y, -- 196.4e between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington . herein caller "Grantor" , znd KING COUNTY WATER �'' corporation, •is ` DISTRICT LTO. 5:3, humein :ailed "Grantee" , 4 I T 2T A S S T ,. 1 _ • !, ir,.--...7. j That in considerat o: of the sumof On:: and no/100 DOLLARS and the performance by ':rantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, .Grantor hereby _ ants unto Grantee, without warranty of I any kind, a right of w:-. not e:_c ''_di .g ten Feet in width as 3 : here:nafter described, the const:-uctioi , maintenance and 1 , operation of the folio, lg 'desc=1bed fa`•' I ' "y: 3 - ix inch watel. main ; One ' w_thi and across the feliowing _.escribec._.nd situated in the . { i Count- of King, state o- Washington, to wit: • 10 foot strip wh_ch lies Southwesterlyof and immediate- ' :y adjacent to the Southwesterly boundary of the City of ' Seattle Pipe Line Right of Way, extending Northwesterly 1 471.71 feet from the East line of Section 20 and, the West 10 feet of the East 30 feet of the North 1122.53 f t feet of the S 4 of Section 20 wilier-lies Southerly of the Pipe Line Right of Way, all in Township 23 North, i i Range 5 East, W.m. I "• The center line of said facility shall hc located ?c follows with- , i in the above described land: .( In 10 foot strip adjoining the Pipe Line ie.ight of 1 Way - five feet southwesterly of anc. parallel to the 1 'i southwesterly boundary line of said Right of Way. In tha West 10 feet of said East 30 feet - four.•.. feet east n, and -_-!lot to the .- •. boundary lira c- Jc:,l(j 30-foot strip. i f This easement is granted on the fol o inc_ terms: t 1 i 1 -l '=, ' ' .. •... .:ncergro nd water C .•i: ,_._ . _.. i . , sist of a single line of pipe not o':c• c.... -- - i buried at ..east three feet 1)..Low :., 11 . ._...-. ::--- , ' � .. i i at all points, and Grange agrees to iastall and maintain substan-• + ,._al permanent markers at both ends-of sail facility o the right hereby granted sufficient to give r., ._ie to all persons of • • way the location of Grantee's buried facility. it 2. Grantee agrees tr sage and hold Grantor harmless from • al} loss or damage which -d:.•i be due to the exercise by Grantee a •"'_�� o` the right herein gran_ ,d and fro all claims for such damage by C = Whomsoever made and to is ;enniffy grantor for all such loss, ;_ amage and claims. 3. • Grantor reserver the right to use s:.i amid for its own rposes in any way, and to grant rights in :aid land to others, .not `r.''Jn'- _.:'rlt •;1 -L1 tb r i.h.`, Y'eref... .. n~-'_! to Grantee, and Grant .. hr ab_ :1:;^ume _ .. . . of le . ; or d:ma..... includ{ng dam- e or ..n;ury to persons ,r to property, which may be suffered by Grantee resulting from Grantor's use of said land and any of its equ__m_._t thereon, whethe...• said damage or injury be due to the reg^ligelce of Grantor, its servants or agents, or otherwise. 4. The right hereby granted shall cease and determine when- • ever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the use of said facility and upon such abandonment Grantee shall remove its facili- ty and restore the premises to as good a condition as they were in • prior to the construction of said facility. 5. All the benefits of this acre_rent shall inure; F. the benefit of, and the buraens hereof shall imposed upcn, the suc- cesrs and assigns of the parties hereto respectively. 6. This easement is subject to a right of way ccnc_,:c: i.iay 25, 1956, from Grantor to Fari fi r Vnr_nwes_ �ipeli •i and to easements from Grantor to Wash_`.ncU_r; Natural i:.'�. ^-:- •. dated July 23, 1958; to the Pacific Teicp lone and 'C�ei• •_r: :�': • . .. 9 - i ,•• 1 Z. • ! s: dated April 24, 1959 and tc the United State:: of America dated 2 1 • 1 • :,i,7,% 1February_ 10, 1960. ; s I ' r. 7. The location of said right of way i•- shown in reed ink ' ' ' '~ on Map marked "PROJECT NO. 3747-27-50, KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT • 58 EASEMENT _ROM PUGET SOUNL POKER x LIGHT", dated September, 1960, =``r-- 1 prep4red by Hill & Ingmnn, ;py of .hich is attached hereto and by - 1 this reference made a part . a:eof. L IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Th..s instr::me nt has been executed by t:... ; +.: oarties hereto as of the day and year first abo're written. , i e . .'PG:T SOUND .OiVER & LIGHT COMPANY t ! , • 1 . /ice President Operation: GRANTOR 1 . Attest: DISTRICT i • / i Ass1stan• .J;c tart' +- ) H i .Cie c rct. . GRANTEE i i , i -: t 1 I 1 i ' it ! i • t t i • .• .i • . ' 1,.:... _ .. . . . . -. _ . . . . I . . . • •- th:. 27. •!:".• of Nr_Tv•••••:::•.-:r ' - •--• . . I . .. '-'.---- • .. ... ._.. _ —747Gli..i..P11.,:%72.1:7.7TIES, IC,C. ... - . 1 .,.... ..., .:, • ! . i ,•<-1- . - . . - .. _ . • • .. , I i'Z' •11,' h•-•••••nafacr ca'!,-i Taa•Tr,,,,Ini'•, o.! Prjr.:F.7 3411_,IN'.) Pf-,..•:!...R 'l• '..!...111r Cro.!it.-- V,n *.l'norlin;ttco c•Trmarati,:o. i .... ... ':-..-:.....•!'!:.er n.....1•! .IT• "'..--..:•••:'•. •..--, . .. . ITccain..ftor canc.! Thc .".In :•••••••i''. . • •'...• •-- . 1 C: . • r... '.';:-..:'.•;"•;37.11-1: m r i .. ":"•...it ••` •.I.1i•in )'.+n ••f ri•• ildilar t,51.) and other vahlartr:e ..a.ac...i......•Tier.s. :••:....;:t of 7:a:el i7 .7.V...,••': an- . ...i.. . . — !...zoe.-1-.1:-c.I. :II:. f•lrant,:•.- I,rr'l•r; 7- ":-. And convey:. to :IT.: `...:;.a.c.,-.. It:. -..... '.-.."---•t:• --..-••! ,r-."L.7.1. ...n :....:•:_-_:;....',. .7.• . . .... . ar.•-Tlectrr.-lin:lacill-af-Tvio, .1.14 the r..-_,T.,t,,.! ..:-,:it te cenntn.-_-..:-....-T.^....••.::-.:::! InT:tre-..e.777..-.:7. 7...:::.....t.t•I 7.7.:.:17•::"...' . i . or'lure cico'ric transmkeion nndier iintritTutior. lin....,-, rr000lT.ti-,-.•T! ; ;•Tr. •-c ':-..-.ars, ..i.r ., •• . -no!-•,..7.---„ . ! rays ...Id anchor:, Cl'irrtr.;;;;M•"., InsuIntors. transmission. dictril-ret:ea Tn•r. :i.•3: •••i:•'.3. :7.;n:'.....3r7::73 1.".-. oth,r-....c. . t . of-.11.: •.:-.-..:::Ter leent.r.1!--: ...t..r...:.: _ . ... . . • . • It . i . . . I • Ti:..-.'o •,_-::::... 1.. ,.`!. :..14'..! .7..F...• t .. .;-..t: . ..7::: i:!. - c ;- . .: . 71.1.7z:7f...ed. as for_ovz: 1 . : . The went 15 -" ot, of tho F..- : . ?, '..,— of :.:. . .! of 2C. . _ . . . . t 1 . •hmt 2a=cci com7hyad by ,lig,:.,,.; 2-:,....Id '...o-:or e. L2., ,t Cc-73.hy -...,o Tho • . _ . -- • . , . . -- . . • 7.i.r..5t '.X..,:•:_nr.7..9.:a Cutzrcii. li..-:c. a:-..i fi..7.,!il in: -.the 1-.?...20r.'..3 )-7 :;:,•afr :...ct.mt:: . .. .. ; ..„ . - ,-.1.,...i.i.L:.1. 4..ti:i ...t.t.n.v,-...L P.....n.W.A.:: :1 .:1...1. :4••:•• .;••0.,.. .,-.), '.11-'-i 7.1...C..:2.. '.....'.•-i;. 3•:::t.f.r.ra :1:: • ''' • ' 1 . 1 .• zs-.:-.1 L',.2.1',-!. lyimg 00l.t1;.ea5. ..:ri', or til 3....1.1t .; ...: .7.....:.7Em.-; .the Cit.:: . . . - i :.....-." .7,11.:tin vtrir.1.1m,, rtaht-nf--.:•:•.-. . i ........ ., •_ • . . ' .. ' . . . . . .. --...... .......a....e. ezn:-........T., a.Lrin-ei.l......_i ... . ' ..- • - -- ,.•....,-:.,,,,,...._:...i.Tc- eni... ,...- e4i„...:,_;...,, ,.. ,T.:: ; ,„,•.,...„,, . . I - • •,-..,-.•-•,-..--;-'-.;47,--.7-r: .. . .. _ . ..._—._.. . . ,.— - . ... - • •• ' .. '. . . . ., . .. . .....• , .. . . . : . . .. . . . . — • - • .. ... . — •• : •••••- . I . _ ....... : "*. " '.1: -.''•-;:.,•'. i- . .• i . . ':.•,:-.,. .(i.:::—...1—'''''''''. o . • I ." . .;::-.-.: • ' ' 1,-..t• `...r..! i;;!it.9!.,..-.1",:es. ,r.' 'IS C'Ir: adjacent land o...t'...-- nranror in crier To exert:ice :la: rli.-.::. . . crent'a: 'a .:: -• --,-,..ocat, inchtilina the riula to. conntrect. •oairtnio an: use 1 r.:!••.,..7.1:•• rnan in.1•.•...•inV(.1 : i i0 •I•i‘••.. ..•:.• :••.' '•:,..! .Iri:Iges on:! :fates. •-.T -..-: "--•:': T-T -.,T.ITt, et Any and all times, to cut too antl•or !Tin! ars and all....resh or tre-..T.,novo .3'...:•t3 t•';' •It: 1!`. 0:,•!..,7CW:i:V. t:T.03 :laid:it' t.-)f,/137, and also tho ..-:,..,h. tr. ..h.:•., to ali/or::I any . '3t•, 0; 1!".' .,r,:4:-.,or..vnrch, '.r. fc......r,-...,, -ould come ..vithin t,cri t ..;,`te'. 0, :',,,:' Of'ill r.'0103. tt"•r7e7. '.•••••• . t•O...:':;. •:•.! . ":"-•''.:•'''': •tr o :3'..:itiCr.; .,1 :3' Grantee Cr rr.err!mann.er ..e. e M..tr..:...: :3.t..1;.:Zar....7.:1•377::.. 1 t.:::3t.'.•• .'-': ' r.-,• .1::•.. t -!7'1.'"ft. 7s ! :- -..! 77.-H.7,:ain any hailn; •r otOcr ot-Tacrero cn '!ne ni.t s: ht-of-wa . 1 ::,!.. :- .-.: -.::.:,:..,-- •,,,i'.'^H.:+ .., ' 7;: 1:.! C: .f...11J fe.T• :roe: -.TT. Irn.?..3 Tiniest;--rneenaOla nccica ..I.ur.:-.. I .-,-.:-. '•-..::.•n ii:•.:: ;•,:.•.•N: '..:•. ..-.:1'.•.•., 171-:ii.:riZ, ,f,••,,,c..--.-t, oIrTII cnntinec in force c.o.d. tecri time as zao.C.Irr...%:-.•, i ; '• ''rIcr:, or'-`,...,,;:r.".• 'i.nai coinpinte:y rcro.-Tve its :trectei., and••••-:..‘ in:rn: .Nam sa._T ,.:..: oraT•nr, .- 1 l pemanentiy nbar.don the..;aazo. Ution-duI. :arao.-z.1 or att.............men.:el! ,..Inie.3t.72.Zt• Z:t.trtt.f.•:•:f..r.::!:terminate. . . Any Mortgage on said tan.: held by the Mortgagee is hereby relea .:d ta ‘,..`tr extent,...-ai on:y to the no.rerseri to CUSOrdinotr!:lin 11d mortgpse to tha rights hereby croated to the Grantee." , -. . IN 7.•111ES WHEREOF this instr:..nent has been executec :he day ar,i year fiat n'o?....o-.71-i::•..r.... - 1 : . • . ; . . . ', • • :-...::.....--....... . .- . . . • • . -- '— ' • l k' . _ •.,-. - . .:. ..:......., ,_ ,.,:,...::••.•::.:y i ...a ' Ca ...rac,i-at• .Terson•Il!.i•;P:i.•••ir,:i.i.. !-,••.''.•n-i• ..— . . .. ... ' . . . • . . • • .1n=i'onn in aC.d...TIT:.ent•enter•I the aTithin ar.d feregein.t Int•-...•-••Tr". •To. c:-.,-.:•• •••• •-• • -• • • • . .__ . ....?q.v.!. volTin'ary art rid deed for the user:nor.'rer,soneo -.........r.TT-- -.• •T::-... 1 41 • •:.'-.'7.I'l na.I'ir.n:.-Iland 3;te:official .1cal Thi -- -.•-.-•T --- • - • -• • ••• • . . , .. . 1 .. . . ,. 1.•,•••• ; . I t • . . • ! • . . . • • ' ' -... . ,. • ..... ... ... ... • .; . ....,, . : . _ ._ .._____ —.. .. ... ... . . i • .. •.'3. .7...,,.. -.:?:.. r^..y _1 td'21--,�.._r 1 , .,_:A ir: nor..a.--...:io:. o:. :a j ii_._. -rsi...b:. _ . e, th.t Gr ierety Cr•::'t^c n:+r11 hove the rizht :;i C.C.Ce63 :.cros3 the c.d,jacent land. of ._„,';Cr in order to c:crci•C the ri -It3 ,_o tod u; tii3 iuscrl+:ent. _.._._..._o t,:•_., r ;;^. ''aonstr•.tnt, t intai .1nd. f.:ae 3 73CC321 real ..n r I . ' e\ 10.3.'a1C31, '4-iti. .__:C3z..ry 0rid3�... r-.:, .. :.. _ Cico.o t,:_ GL•7..'1 not plo.RC; construct O:' ..^.iS a.::: - • Crantor o `i.1't'_^ Yh::`.::co __ •. :.1_... .c. e..0 .__........:1'.: t.o..1C:: :...reo:: .....3 �I•...._ .. vcc. to ?!to,a i- -.r.=; n..^,_•_ a= :ishoz !•.Crete t ..re e.. to the stall ....tinge _ . . ._ ._"_.. •._....i1 .^uoLl t.f.zna w. 4= , :.to :,_Cc_____3 ^_ .341y::, .;1.'�� i ....c.. ._. o-..... a.. ..GCo:�..est . ....ta 11...-•i . •:il ._. _Jib . - ^.la., _elloac,i 1. • : ._._._.. ._ ..^:1. i . / .---;' • n/ /,' e • u"'...Y 's 02 ia�',.i_—C 24:1 . .:77: C'? ::Win? 1 /' .. —? • _.N.: `.1.L. _`./L:t„,/ ._..try +•._-i+ '::i ,%,!::ice•:: �• ..'� .. w.Iy�•+:.K •. _- tc . au ..ris:S...e t toy. �a^ _.. .. ._. :.. ....:': ..._::�. ra" .3-Le.J n: W1Lica, zor r^.3 L'c:O3 a'.^_3 _ �::)re^ ...._..•_� _ 11 �• NE4,SE4, SEC. 20, T 23 N, R 5 E, WM n'1 21 e/ - - • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON '/Y. °`\ \ DEEM TO T"` REC.NaMEES111T• '':®l14''`\ iraOl�i to e�ii�l{I 4"./ -' I \\• ?� \ 1 oariite `\ ` I • CilN,i-\ �i \\ \ \ SAM OF NE7ArNa NAM S3/SX PROPERt /: L 04.' •�2. \\ CORNER . ,. . Il� /� R 41E.61 \�\; ��•—M.rxi 100 so o Itb too b0 --�" ` g / "for 1 N FUT 1-1H# TER DETAIL 1 ROLLING HILLS VILLAGE ivi ialiHET EAST 30 1Y 111 \`• LEGENU NO/cAtl VOL 79-44/43 / R00.144 S37S11S J 1 M (��,y • .7• M / Iv 9llOTR1oAL Met /{/lJ�� ( T« ILO�• PROPER rY TRACT A ') ROT 1o'OF THE EAST Se fir IbAD CORNER REC No. 739910 C.3 y`� R 114 S170S74 1 3 Ioy I -•-•'-S'Soon FENCE �J�3 i -4-4-4- 4'OIASI Lee MO/ \ °' / 70'ROM MET (g� \ `'t�, �•�� AS POI TITLE REPORT 4 Mm. _. 1 TAX LOT MAXXAM \ [� ``C�, GUMMI CORNER Q / 3• I O.J3' LT Of 21j2e wRNcuR XQ1AElIT 0 4. �P y H Of SEC UNE o.0 /Ir AREA .• 12.668* ACRES // 20.21 � T t10N1Acxr«CML 4,. q' T.P.o.e. 29 2E an TTN X0N,,. IS4o �� YQIAWIT M CASE PRoP u �� -to OM) • \/\'_JD 88 09 22. yr ® Loy 11AUXAM (VI SEE DETAIL 1 RMnrnA�iTV UK DTDcED DETAIL 2 / © © SEE DETAIL 2 , N • lroAI DfsCRIPNfM (pFR Tin REPORT DATED TER 1. 1999) NO SCALE / , L t THAT PORTION Of 11t SOUTHEAST 1/4 r SECTION 20, TORX}P 23 NORTH / 14f �' 11.1 RNNOE S EAST Ril.DOUR Al MDR* Ate'' �TL s 7� Al ® S =Immo AT THE MORftRAXT CORER Of ENO R/XpvRtORt / �' R 777 TIQICS 9aTH o1'00'x MT, IMPS THE WIT7lY urn OP ENO / ROWNO HILLS VILLAGE No.3 f1RST CHRISOLP CHURCH nl fLENGEslo A DISTANCE of S, I HIT m THE TRUE POINT OF VOL et-97t9E ® SEE DETAIL J y, KING COUNTY I Q apt / ..4) REC. No. 5615593 d 111E4CE NORTH M•0•'22'SOT A CO TAME of 3000 FEET, / 7.SITY 0 +'t`.I� 1.2Y !I T40RTIRO1l .T LIMIOSI4 Er of row OMITI X 0URCH PROPERTY AS A. 4'/ r ��jjjj•• RECORDED I11DA1 UIl COUNTY RECO D«0 HO, 541 SJE}• te. 1;4 m,_01 0%gE `{T• 1 tD � THENCE NORTH 40.00"00'EMT. NO110 SAM SOU MIAS TEAM WARM, . / \ . MEWLLADSOUTHEASTERLY A DISTANCE OF SW/FM TO A POINT OF ORWeftSAT • •� •S. PROP 080.27 TIM © '. .. Q _ SEE DETAIL 4 \ 111741E CONTINUING MONO,SAO NARON A 01STNiCE 0/ 41.57 rRt m A PONT ON THE EASTERLY wR Of SNO 9UX0'.' 4 DET 1TI0N01 SOUTH 0l'O03X•'ROT:A R4TINCE OT 2X0.11 RUT, MONO DETAIL 3 It* •Q•� 1 20 2t tNo EASTERLY UNITS m THE rTlE POSIT a Eca.wa, 1/0 SCAM / I� 29 20 aT ATE N TK OTT Of 11041011,COUNTY OP MS,STAR OF VAf11«OTON. SURVIVORS CERT►ICATS /. Rao IHXmiryL.Mtr.10.16Se.MrtHNe. RECOF�D SURVEY •. .E.to d 4see.R o•Ple Owed./Sv."AV4 R I N G E L & ASSOCIATES 0 ..�1.,Savoy 6.ti...ae..►eew 0.•e j,FOR t v..,ON.�.a.t.1 I,me N.sal N . �`` `"'��' `'S" CITY O RE N T O N r RL5 P.O. BOX 742 e+M,.n R3 73117 E4 OF 10. /9e0 �- CASCADE. IDAHO WA. /23 6361 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ._Sy ba d y.w,., ROLLING HILLS ►T /70173 " (2od)I 392-4230 o°'" ""NO°"' 7 d�'�'` RESERVOIR • AND PUMP STATION PILE No. CR93JSR3 0..9oN Cr WOKS N aicroo u...v., s„e„M,,,1„t d E,a,d SUR-03-0037 'PROJECT No. WTR-2230 JOB NO. CR95035 'DATE: 2/15/96 'PACE 1 Of I b \ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION (cont.) Note: If there is more than one legal owner,please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: CITY OF RENTON WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR-ELEVATED EXISTING ZONING:. ADDRESS: 1055 S.GRADY WAY PUBLIC ZONE(P-1) CITY: RENTON,WA ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR—ELEVATED WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR—GROUND LEVEL TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-7295 WATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT PROPOSED ZONING: PUBLIC ZONE(P-1) (� NAME: JOHN DAVID WILSON Ca), RF-x„ . SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): AUGroN G ADDRESS: 1055 S.GRADY WAY 3.5 acres within a 12.97 acre area �I v n 1990, RF�Fi RFD PROJECT VALUE: CITY: RENTON,WA ZIP: 98055 $3,500,000(Estimate) TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-7295 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROJECT INFORMATION NO PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ROLLING HILLS 3 MILLION GALLON RESERVOIR AND PUMP STATION IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: SENSITIVE AREA? Rolling Hills Reservoir Site NO 2400 Puget Drive SE Renton,WA 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): K.C.Tax Lot#202305-9109 LEGAL DESCRIPTIC.F PROPERTY (Attach separate set'necessary) , BEG 646.62 FT S OF NE COR OF SE 1/4 TH N 88-09-22 W 00 FT TH S 46-50-38 W 766.92 FT TH N 43-09-22 W 561.35 FT TO SELY MGN PUGET DRIVE TH NELY ALG SD MGN TO E LN OF SD SUBD TH S ALG SD E LN 280.88 FT TO POB. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT$ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ X_SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (NO.CU.YDS: ) VARIANCE $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ (FROM SECTION: ) WAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY • WETLAND PERMIT $ FINAL _ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: TENTATIVE _PRELIMINARY _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ FINAL _CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge X_ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I,(Print Name)JOHN DAVID WILSON,declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Nile authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary Publ i for the State JOHN DAVID WILSON of COOS/4• residing at ` 1 1 ,//, . e of Owner/Representative) RE11/4(TO N ,on the (GI day Q` 0•.F E RK/ti�Oi ` G� 199Q Q•. \ssionF•�0,, # ___5 • %Co Si ature o wner/Represe tative) 4€Aid.4. C. J- tfi-a' --_- 0 (Signature of Notary Publ. T4'•, 0 (This se ' n to be completed by City Staff.) IiO%11 111t��``� City File Number:Lt9A9 1 11 0' SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM • PMHP FMHP BSP A TOTAL FEES: $ v..h TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ N /A REVISED 1/95 'IELOPMENT PLAN ;di13G CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 0 1999 PROJECT NARRATIVE RECEIVED Project W-2230 CONSTRUCT ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION 2400 PUGET DRIVE SE Project Purpose. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate a deficit of water storage needed for the 590, 490 and 350 pressure zones of the City's water distribution system. Currently, the quantity of storage located in these pressure zones does not meet State of Washington criteria for equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage. Proposed Improvement Scope. The proposed project includes the construction of a three million gallon water storage tank and a 2,099 square foot, single story booster pump station. The proposed construction will be on a 12.97 acre, City owned site at 2400 Puget Drive SE. The proposed above ground, steel reservoir will be 119 feet in diameter and 45 feet high. The booster pump station building will have concrete masonry walls and a standing seam metal roof on wood framing. The booster pump station will include an emergency electrical generator. A double walled, 550 gallon, above ground, storage tank for diesel fuel for the generator engine will be located adjacent to the building. The work is immediately adjacent to the existing 300,000 gallon elevated Rolling Hills reservoir located on the same site. The project also includes 1,387 linear feet of water line of which 180 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 594 linear feet of sanitary sewer line of which 70 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 1,457 linear feet of drain lines; 3051 square yards of crushed stone driveways and paths; a bermed containment area and storm water detention pond; approximately 16,900 square yards of graded, topsoiled and seeded areas; and 1,000 linear feet of 8 ft. high security fence. No off-site improvements are proposed. After construction approximately 3 per cent of the parcel will be covered with impervious surfaces. The site soils are silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles. There is no evidence of channelized flow or streams on this site. The peak runoff increase for this project for the 24-hour, 100-year event is less than 0.5 cfs. Approximately 15,864 cubic yards of soil will be cut for the construction of the reservoir and building foundations, roadways and paths, and detention pond. The berms will require 2,146 cubic yards of native material with 2,146 cubic yards coming from on-site excavation. The net amount of material being hauled off the site will be 13,718 cubic yards. Approximately 1,600 cubic yards of aggregates and select fill will be hauled to the site for use in utility trench back fill, foundations, roadways, pathways and drainage ways. The volume of imported topsoil will be approximately 2,800 cubic yards. The following types, sizes and numbers of trees will be removed: Alder: 8" — 33 each, 9" — 1 each, 10"— 18 each, 11"— 1 each, 12"—30 each, 13"— 1 each, 14"— 14 each, 18"—2 each, 22"— 1 each, and 24"— 1 each; Fir: 8"—4 each, 9"—2 each, 10"—2 each, 12"—8 each, 14"— 5 each, and 16"—2 each; Maple: 8"—4 each, 10" —4 each, 12 inch— 3 each, 14" — 5 each, 16" — 3 each, 18" — 8 each, 20"—6 each, 21"— 1 each, 22"—2 each, 24"—3 each, 26"—3 each, 28"— 1 each, 33"— 1 each and 36"— 1 each. Miscellaneous brush and grass will be removed over a 3.7 acre area. Current Use of Site. The site is zoned as P-1, Public Use. Adjacent properties are zoned R-8, Residential (eight units per acre). Currently the site is used for a 300,000 gallon elevated water tank for the City's drinking water distribution system and for storage of sand used by the Public Works Department's street crews. Adjacent properties: to the northwest and north are the Bonneville Power Authority's switch yard and transmission lines, to the northeast and east are single family residences (Tiffany Park and Ponderosa Estates), to the southeast is a church (United Christian Church), to the south and southwest are single family residences (Rolling Hills Village No. 3) and to the west are multi-family residences(Rolling Hills Village).. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Project W-2230 CONSTRUCT ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION 2400 PUGET DRIVE SE Proposed Construction Start Date: March 2000. Proposed Construction End Date: May 2001. Hours of Operation: Construction will be conducted five days per week, Monday through Friday, excluding City of Renton holidays. The construction period will between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. Dust Abatement and Mud Control: The construction contractor shall be required to comply with City of Renton Standard Specification requirements for dust and mud control. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC): The construction contractor shall be required to comply with City of Renton Standard Specification requirements for TESC. Noise Control: The construction contractor shall be required to comply with maximum environmental noise level provisions of the Renton Municipal Code. C/ ENT p LA RFN oN••s 1G AUG 1959 CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ,r-1 Onl+^ENT Pt-- D ' CITY OF REN-i Li'v A. BACKGROUND AJi r 2 0 1999 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EC G�i D CITY OF RENTON Project W-2230 Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -1- August 19, 1999 the building. The work is immediately adjacent to the existing 300,000 gallon elevated Rolling Hills reservoir located on the same site. The project also includes 1,387 linear feet of water line of which 180 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 594 linear feet of sanitary sewer line of which 70 linear feet will be within right-of-way; 1,457 linear feet of drain lines; 3051 square yards of crushed stone driveways and paths; a bermed containment area and storm water detention pond; approximately 16,900 square yards of graded, topsoiled and seeded areas; and 1,000 linear feet of 8 ft. high security fence. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate a deficit of water storage needed for the 590, 490 and 350 pressure zones of the City's water distribution system. Currently, the quantity of storage located in these pressure zones does not meet State of Washington criteria for equalizing, fire and emergency stand-by storage. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed construction will be located in the NE quarter of the SE quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5; King County Tax Lot 2023059109. Legal description: BEG 646.62 FT S OF NE COR OF SE 1/4 TH N 88-09-22 W 00 FT TH S 46-50-38 W 766.92 FT TH N 43-09-22 W 561.35 FT TO SELY MGN PUGET DRIVE TH NELY ALG SD MGN TO E LN OF SD SUBD TH S ALG SD E LN 280.88 FT TO POB. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Westerly two thirds of site, where project is proposed to be constructed, has average slope of 4.5 per cent. Easterly third of site has slopes up to 30 percent. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate per cent slope?) Approximately 4.5 per cent in work area. Approximately 30 per cent in adjacent areas to the west. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -3- August 19, 1999 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater will run off from roofs of the proposed structures. The stormwater runoff will be collected in stormwater drain pipes and discharge into a storm water detention pond which will be constructed as part of this proposed project. The detention pond will have an overflow / flow control structure. The overflow structure discharges to a 12 inch diameter storm drain line located in the 116th Avenue SE right-of-way. The berm around the detention pond will also encompass the water storage reservoir. The bermed area is sized to hold the 2.85 million gallons. SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -5- August 19, 1999 • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The berm, detention pond and other disturbed areas will be hydroseeded with meadow seed mix(King County Surface Water Design Manual specs). 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, othe Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, they Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other smelt Iv O U F b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used to power water booster pumps, building lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The building envelope will be insulated to comply with the State of Washington Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -7- August 19, 1999 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public Zone (P-1). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The façade of the booster pump station will be compatible with the architecture of the buildings in the surrounding area. Existing trees not being removed will help screen the booster pump station from view. The exterior coating of the water storage reservoir will be a neutral color(e.g., off-white). 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -9- August 19, 1999 • 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Existing access to the site is off of Puget Drive SE An additional access drive off of Puget Drive SE and to the south of the existing drive will be added in the proposed project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. The current vehicular trips to the site will remain the same. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A. SEPA-W-2230,Rolling Hills Three Million Gallon Reservoir and Pump Station -11- August 19, 1999 List of Drawing for City of Renton Site Plan Approval 1. For"Site Plan": a) Sheet 8 of 47,Drawing CO2,Proposed Overall Site Plan- 12 copies b) Sheet 9 of 47,Drawing C05,Proposed Site and Landscaping Plan 1 - 12 copies c) Sheet 10 of 47,Drawing C09,Proposed Site and Landscaping Plan 2- 12 copies d) Sheet 11 of 47,Drawing C08, Proposed Site Details-5 copies 2. For"Architectural Elevations": a) Sheet 12 of 47,Drawing C04, Site Cross-Sections- 12 copies b) Sheet 14 of 47,Drawing SO2,Booster Station Wall Plan- 12 copies c) Sheet 17 of 47,Drawing S05,Booster Station Roof Plan and Details- 12 copies d) Sheet 33 of 47,Drawing M54,Reservoir Plan- 12 copies 3. For"Grading Elevations": a) Sheet 3 of 47,Drawing C06,Construction Grading and TESC Plan- 12 copies b) Sheet 4 of 47,Drawing C07,Construction Grading and TESC Details- 12 copies c) Sheet 11 of 47,Drawing C08,Proposed Site Details-(included above) 4. For"Utilities Plan,Generalized": a) Sheet 8 of 47,Drawing CO2,Proposed Overall Site Plan-5 copies 5. For"Drainage Control Plan": a) Sheet 5 of 47,Drawing CO3,Proposed Utility Plan 1 -5 copies b) Sheet 6 of 47,Drawing C 10,Proposed Utility Plan 1 -5 copies c) Sheet 11 of 47,Drawing C08,Proposed Site Details-(included above) 6. For"Landscaping Plan,Conceptual": a) Sheet 9 of 47,Drawing C05,Proposed Site and Landscaping Plan 1 -(included above) b) Sheet 10 of 47,Drawing C09,Proposed Site and Landscaping Plan 2-(included above) c) Sheet 11 of 47,Drawing C08,Proposed Site Details-(included above) 7. For"Floor Plans": a) Sheet 14 of 47,Drawing SO2,Booster Station Wall Plan-(included above) 8. For"Tree Cutting/Land Clearing(tree inventory)Plan: a) Sheet 2 of 47,Existing Overall Site Plan-4 copies 9. Plan Reductions: one black and white 8-1/2"by 11"reduction of each sheet listed above (reduced from full size to 8-1/2"by 11") 10. Presentation copies: full size sheets(22"by 34")of the following sheets-one of each: . Sheet 8, Sheet 9,Sheet 10, Sheet 12, Sheet 17,and Sheet 33. ME.C•1T FI D �C�N O�kE�` DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Geotechnical Report 2AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Deta.Iled 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 eGPG Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: `� q LCp4/ 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: {6C G fill 6 �l CLs 42 S cow 2. Public Works Plan Review Section P 1 SIAl 3. Building Section DATE: 4 !/60fr (9J [ 5 2 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls 71 1 —tl l t • . • 'o I • - - :, Report i..\ - = `'' - -. := - ,. Phase III Geotechnical Engineering-Services- - ` _ Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and_ " { Booster. Pump Station _ '. V- - ' •' Renton,.Washington • - • • March 22, 1996 - . • - • _ ' — .•� 1. • • • • for ..r`' - -' •. `r -;r' - �._=' ' .. _ _• ' City ofRenton -1.•: . ., - ,.. 4-..i :);-:-.-...--. — .-..-'.---,, • •••--.4 N- -,1-'•"•-' --'‘ --• ; : •• — ••• •••-•:-•••‘;•'• •" '• . 4 : ...,.,.; ‘,,,,,„17„... _.E::: •„: „(...... •••• .:: ..• .,, _ .•,..: .: ?• __ .:__ ,..:„..1 . __:... . .... . . .... ..• ,.. ..... .: •_,:. : __•_,, ,: ., ..:. ; • 7.. ... k: . .'. i: : , ,__ .:.,..7:. a - • r •t • /• r• J t it -, - .�_ • • • • — �,.� . _' '/. •�/.- .•r• .• :�-. .�- _ . _ ti .. ; .. i: 1. .y' ' ., y _ G e o E n g i n e. e r s File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • Geo Engineers %TEARS March 22, 1996 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists RH2 Engineering Offices in Washington, Opportunity Building Oregon.and Alaska 8383 - 158th Avenue Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 Attention: Mr. Dan Ervin We are pleased to submit three copies of our "Report, Phase III Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington." The scope of our services for this study is described in our confirming agreement dated • October 23, 1995. Authorization to proceed with the services was provided by Mr. Geoff Clayton during a team meeting at your office on October 5, 1995. Portions of the results of this study were discussed with Mr. Erwin and Mr. Steve Savage of Coughlin Porter Lundeen (project structural engineer) as our conclusions were developed. GeoEngineers presented the results of our Phase I and II portions of the site study in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington" dated April 13, 1988. Our Phase I study included an evaluation of the historical mining hazard and fault/earthquake hazard and the Phase II study presented the • results of specific foundation explorations and design and construction recommendations. It has been our pleasure to work with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of our report or if we may be of further service, please call. Yours very truly, (. . . GeoE eineers, In . • • • B McFadden, P.E. • roject Manager • cZ::•—• • Jon W. Koloski Principal • .1JM:JAIC:cros Document ID: 0693044.R • File No.0693-044-02 GeoEngineers,Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond,WA 98052 Telephone(206)S61-6000 Fax(206)861-6050 1 (- CONTENTS ' Page No. ' INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 GENERAL 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 i - GROUND WATER CONDITIONS 3 o r r.. • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL 3 t SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 3 z= • FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS 4 i V Water Storage Tanks 4 Booster Pump Station 5 Lateral Resistance 6 • UTILITY TRENCHES 6 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 7 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 7 ROADWAY PAVEMENT DESIGN 8 LIMITATIONS 9 r-; FIGURES Figure No. Site Plan - 1 - Generalized Geologic Cross Sections 2 c. 3 . . .. . - Site Response Spectra, Subduction Zone Earthquake - i Site Response Spectra, Seattle Fault Earthquake 4 . • . • APPENDICES - Page No. • Appendix A A-1 { APPENDIX A FIGURES Fiaure No. s Soil Classification System A-1 . Logs of Test Pits V A-2 A-5 Page No. Appendix B - Summary of Potential Geologic Hazards B-1 Coal Mining Activity • B 1 B-2 •• V • • Seismic Considerations • • Appendix C - Selected References C 1 G e o f "n g i n e e r s j File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 t I REPORT t i PHASE III GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES i 1 PROPOSED ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR CITY OF RENTON `44..'' • INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our Phase III geotechnical engineering services for the r.::, proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station to be located in Renton, Was ing.ton. ' The site is located south and west of the intersection of Puget Drive Southeast and Edmonds Avenue Southeast, as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. GeoEngineers presented the results of our Phase I and II portions of the site study in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services,Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington" dated April 13, 1988. Our Phase I study included an evaluation of the historical mining hazard and fault/earthquake hazard and the Phase II study presented the 1 results of specific foundation explorations and design and construction recommendations. • We understand that the proposed project will consist of constructing two water storage tanks, each with a 4-million-gallon capacity. The tanks are expected to be about 40 feet high with their base at Elevation 453 and overflow at Elevation 490. The tanks will be about 130 feet in diameter and be constructed as at-grade steel structures. We also understand that the south j tank shown on our site plan will be constructed at this time and the other tank in the future. A 1 booster pump station will be located adjacent to the new tanks and will pump to the city's existing elevated tank located on the site. . IL- . SCOPE .The purpose of our services for this phase of the project is to provide geotechnical design r • . : . recommendations based on the subsurface soil and ground water information obtained during our 1988 P study. The s ecif c scope of our services consists of the following tasks: 1 1. Attend one meeting with representatives of RH2 Engineering to discuss the design elements I , . for the project. . _-. 2. Review available soil and ground water information obtained during our previous study and i for nearby studies. • 3. Review information and describe the risks associated with previously identified potential geologic hazards at the site. . • 4. Describe and characterize soil and ground water conditions at the site. J. I 11 File No.0693-044 02-1130/032296 G c o E n g in e e r s 5. Provide recommendations for site preparation and earthwork including estimated stripping ` depths, use of on-site soil for structural fill and trench backfill, and requirements for imported fill. This will also include recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill and a discussion of wet weather construction considerations. 6. Provide recommendations for temporary excavation and trench side slopes, and permanent cut and fill slope inclinations. This will include recommendations for dewatering and temporary excavation shoring, if necessary. 7. Establish design values for foundation support, estimated postconstruction settlement of the proposed facilities, and active and passive lateral earth pressures for design of below grade elements. This will include the coefficient of base friction to resist lateral loads. 8. Provide recommendations for access road construction and design pavement section. 9. Provide seismic design coefficients based on the UBC (Uniform Building Code) seismic criteria. 10. Prepare a written report presenting our findings and recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS GENERAL GeoEngineers completed an assessment of geologic hazards in the project area as part of _ our 1988 study. The results of that study and comments regarding studies and information available since then pertaining to potential geologic hazards is provided in Appendix B. The summary in Appendix B pertains to both coal mine and seismic hazards. Based on our review . and recent research, it is our opinion that there is a low risk of hazard from the presence of deep coal mines below the site. The "Conclusions and Recommendations" section of this report provides our recommendations for reducing seismic risks. SURFACE CONDITIONS " The site is approximately 10 acres in area, with current development limited to the city of Renton's existing elevated water-tank. We noted several minor excavations or areas of ground : modification during our site reconnaissance and field exploration program as part of our previous :study. The site has been logged at least once with only, scattered evergreen trees remaining. Most of the site is covered with relatively thick brush and small- to moderate-sized deciduous • trees. A topographic ridge trends in a generally north to south direction across the site. The east flank of the ridge is a very gentle slope, dropping about 10 feet of elevation in 300 feet. The west flank is a more moderate slope, dropping about 10 feet in 100 feet, and then sloping slightly steeper toward the property boundary. The general site topography is shown in Figure 1. GeoEngineers• • 2 File No.0693-044-02.1130/032296 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were evaluated as part of our previous study by excavating eight test pits at the locations shown in Figure 1. A detailed discussion of the exploration procedures and logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. The subsurface conditions encountered in our test pits were relatively uniform. An exception was Test Pit 5, which encountered about 1 foot of fill soils with considerable organic matter apparently associated with previous grading performed on the site. The explorations indicate the site is mantled by a layer of forest duff, sod and topsoil up to about 0.5 feet in thickness. Greater depths of organics should be expected in densely vegetated areas. The topsoil generally overlies a variable thickness of loose to medium dense brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel. Occasional roots were noted in several of the test pits to a depth of about 2 feet. Below a depth which varied from about 3 to 6-1/2 feet of depth, very dense gray silty sand with gravel, occasional cobbles and boulders was encountered in all the test pits. This stratum is referred to geologically as glacial till and has been compressed under the weight of glacial ice. The upper loose to medium dense soils represent the weathered horizon of the glacial till. The subsurface conditions are shown in the Generalized Geologic Cross Sections, Figure 2. The locations of the sections are shown in Figure 1. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Very slow ground water seepage was observed within a sandy layer of the glacial till in Test Pit 1. Slow ground water seepage was also observed in Test Pit 8 at the bottom of the weathered • horizon. No ground water seepage was observed in any of the other test pits. Fluctuations in ground water conditions should be expected as a result of changes in season, precipitation and other factors. A perched ground water condition likely occurs seasonally at the bottom of the weathered till layer which overlies very dense relatively impermeable unweathered till. Hi • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL - The two water storage tanks and booster pump station can be constructed on the site as proposed provided site earthwork and foundation preparation is completed as recommended below. The tanks and building footings should be founded on the medium dense to dense native till or properly placed structural fill. i..: SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK The following recommendations apply to all earthwork and structural fill placement and compaction. • Portions of the site where structures or access roads will be located should be stripped of vegetation and topsoil. Based on the explorations, we expect that stripping depths will average about 6 inches. G e o E n g i n e e r s 3 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • Additional stripping depths may be necessary where trees are removed and if the site soils are softened during construction. • • Temporary cuts are expected to encounter weathered and unweathered glacial till. • The exposed subgrade must be compacted to a firm, nonyielding condition prior to placing structural fill or formwork. • For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts into the weathered till be sloped at a maximum of 11/2H:1V (horizontal to vertical) and unweathered till 1H:1V for cuts less than about 8 feet in height. • Sloughing or spalling of either of these zones could occur at these slope angles and some modifications for safety purposes may be necessary. Construction grades should prevent surface water from entering the excavation. Erosion protection such as plastic sheeting should be applied during wet weather conditions. • The native weathered and unweathered till will be suitable for structural fill in roadway • areas, but only if the moisture content can be controlled. We recommend using imported . structural fill for support of tank and building foundations, and floor slabs. • Imported structural fill should consist of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines by weight relative to the fraction of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. This imported fill material should be free of rock fragments larger than 6 inches, debris and organic materials. • Structural fill placed in proposed foundation and floor slab areas must be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD (maximum dry density) (per ASTM D-1557). • • Structural fill placed in utility trenches should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except in any areas to be paved. In these areas the upper 2 feet below finished subgrade must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the same standard. • The site soils possess a high silt content. These soils are easily disturbed during wet - - • weather conditions. We recommend the earthwork be performed during the drier summer • months. Construction traffic should be minimized in the foundation area during wet weather. • It may.be necessary to blanket the glacial till soils with pit run or crushed rock in order to minimize disturbance during wet weather construction activities. It will be necessary to recompact or remove soils loosened or softened during construction as discussed above. Specific erosion/sediment control facilities must be included in the grading design because of high erosion potential of the on-site soils. FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS • Water Storage Tanks • The tanks should be supported on a ringwall footing or mat foundation with a thickened edge. G e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No.0693.044-02-1130/032296 • The foundation should bear on the dense to very dense native till encountered in our test pits. A mud mat should be placed immediately after foundation excavation to protect the subgrade. • Ringwall footings should be at least 18 inches wide and extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade for frost protection. • Provided the subgrade is prepared as recommended above, an allowable bearing pressure of 5,000 psf(pounds per square foot) may be used for the total of dead and long-term live loads. i • This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third for short duration live loads such as those resulting from wind and seismic loads. • We recommend that the floor slab or tank bottom be supported on at least a 6-inch thickness of crushed rock compacted to at least 95 percent MDD. • • All trench backlill within the tank area should consists of imported structural fill, as described above, compacted to at least 95 percent MDD. We estimate that postconstruction settlement of the tank, supported as recommended above, should be less than 1/2 inch under full loading with differential settlem•:nt of less than 1/4 inch. This settlement should be largely completed after the initial full height water test is done. Booster Pump Station • The booster pump station building can be supported on conventional spread footings founded either on the native dense till or on a pad of structural fill. • The zone of structural fill supporting foundation elements should extend laterally beyond the foundation edges a horizontal distance at least equal to the thickness of the structural fill placed. The building footings should be at Ieast 18 inches wide. _ . • • For frost protection,the footings should be founded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent finished grade. • Footings supported on native subgrade or a structural fill pad extending to the native dense i fill prepared as recommended above can be designed using an allowable bearing pressure • of 3,000 psf for the total of dead and long-term live loads. • This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third for short-term live loads such as those resulting from wind or seismic forces. 1 '� ravel containingless than • A base course consisting of at least 4 inches of free-draining gravel 3 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a capillary break. • • A vapor barrier such as plastic sheeting may be used to provide added protection against the upward migration of moisture into the floor slab, if appropriate. • A 2-inch-thick layer of sand should be placed over the vapor barrier for protection against damage during concrete placement. G e o E n g i n e e r s 5 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 Y We estimate that the postconstruction settlement of both footings and floor slab,,supported 1 as recommended above, will be less than 1/2 inch. Most of this settlement is expected to occur as loads are applied. • Lateral Resistance • Passive resistance should be evaluated using an equivalent fluid density of 350 pcf(pounds per cubic foot) on the sides of the tank ringwall and the pump house footings. This value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. • Resistance to passive pressure should be calculated from below a depth of 1 foot measured • k from the lowest adjacent ground surface unless the adjacent area is paved. In that case, ,�_; passive resistance can be calculated from the finished pavement surface. • This passive resistance applies where structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent MDD extends outward at least two times the depth of the footing or tank ringwall. • Frictional resistance can be evaluated using 0.4 for the coefficient of base friction against foundation elements. This value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. We recommend that all footing excavations be evaluated by a representative of our firm immediately before any mud mat structural fill, crushed rock, sand and gravel, steel or concrete is placed, to determine if the work is completed in accordance with our recommendations and that i subsurface conditions are as expected. UTILITY TRENCHES We expect that utility trench excavations will be constructed using conventional open-cut techniques. The following recommendations apply to excavation and bacldill. . • • All shoring and temporary slopes should conform to applicable local, state and federal l • - . safety regulations. * • • - For planning purposes, temporary excavations within the upper layer of weathered till which are iri excess of 4 feet but less than 8 feet in depth should be sloped at no steeper 1 than 11/2H:1V unless lateral support of the trench sides is provided. The portions of temporary excavations within the underlying unweathered till should be sloped at no steeper than 1H:1V. - i • . Ground water seepage, if encountered during excavation, may be controlled by ditching and using sump pumps, as necessary. • Trench backfill may consist of the weathered and unweathered till if adequate compaction can be achieved. If construction takes place during periods of wet weather imported I . . structural fill may be required to achieve adequate compaction. Soil imported for trench backfill should meet the requirements of structural fill presented above. • Backfill placement and compaction should meet the requirements presented above for structural fill. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No.0693-044-02.1130/032296 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that a perforated perimeter drain be installed at the footing elevation of the proposed booster pump building and at the bottom of any equipment sumps which extend below footing elevation. A perforated drain should also be placed for the reservoirs if the site grades are such that hydrostatic pressures could develop below the tank bottom. These perforated drains should be collected and routed by a gravity tightline to a suitable discharge point. Provisions should be made for water collected under the bottom of the reservoir to drain into the perimeter drain or other suitable discharge. Surface drainage systems should be installed in conjunction with the proposed booster pump building and water storage tanks. Roof drains should be r� tightlined to a suitable discharge point well away from the tanks and booster pump building. Roof drains must not be discharged at a location or in a manner that water can back up into the footing or subslab drains. The ground surface adjacent to the tanks and building should be sloped to drain away from the structures. . SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The project site is located within the Puget Sound region which is a moderately active seismic area. We spoke with Mr. Steve Savage of Coughlin Porter Lundeen (project structural engineers) and understand that water storage tanks are typically designed to resist seismically induced lateral loads by using a pseudo-dynamic design approach in accordance with either the UBC (Uniform Building Code) Section 1632 or AWWA (American Water Works Association) D-100 methodology for steel tank design. Both approaches establish a ground acceleration based • on zonation maps for the United States. According to the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, the project site is located within Seismic Risk Zone 3 with a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.30. This zone generally corresponds to a ground acceleration of about 0.30g, where g is the gravitational constant. As defined in'the Uniform Building Code, the site is best classified as a Soil Profile Type Si. This • • . -profile type consists of "dense or stiff soil conditions where the depth of soil exceeds 200 feet." .We also completed a site specific seismic evaluation to determine the ground response -= during an earthquake and the maximum likely ground acceleration for two scenarios: (1) a subduction zone earthquake off the coast of Washington, and (2) an event along the Seattle Fault • which is represented by a series of east-west trending faults which extend through the Seattle area. The site specific evaluation was completed using the SHAKE2 computer program developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley. r. Subduction zone earthquakes located along the coast of Washington are thought to be • capable of generating earthquakes of magnitude 8.5 or greater. Earthquakes along the subduction zone are generally located at depths of about 35 kilometers and at a distance of about 150 to 270 kilometers from the site. The energy and magnitude of ground motion for these earthquakes, particularly the moderate to high frequency motions, are generally attenuated (reduced) prior to • reaching the Puget Sound area. Based on our site specific evaluation, it is our opinion that G e o E n g i n e c r s 7 File No.0693-044-02.1130/032296 • ground accelerations of 0.14g to 0.20g may be expected at the site. These accelerations are based on peak bedrock accelerations of 0.09g to 0.13g and the soil conditions at the site. These ground 1-1 accelerations are well within the general range of accelerations applied by the pseudo dynamic l approach of the UBC or AWWA. However, the period of the ground motions will be longer which may develop higher dynamic forces within a tank from the sloshing liquid. A site response spectra is included in Figure 3 for a subduction zone event. The UBC response spectra is also shown in Figure 3. A shallow nearby fault such as the Seattle Fault may result in relatively high ground motions resulting from a moderate magnitude earthquake. The Seattle Fault has been studied and ' evaluated for years. New developments in research indicate that the Seattle Fault is a series of ' four or more east-west trending, south dipping faults which extends from the Kitsap Peninsula to the Cascade foothills. The fault zone passes below the south portion of Elliott Bay and extends i`. east to Issaquah generally along the Interstate 90 corridor. The fault is located about 10 kilometers below the ground surface and about 12 kilometers north of the site. The likely maximum magnitude of earthquakes generated along this fault is about 7 to 7.5. Based on our - site specific evaluation, it is our opinion that around accelerations of 0.60g to 0.80g may occur -_ at the site during a strong earthquake. These accelerations are based on peak bedrock accelerations of 0.40g to 0.57g and the soil conditions at the site. A ground response spectra is presented in Figure 4 for a Seattle Fault event along with the UBC response spectra. 1 Our analysis suggests that relatively high levels of ground shaking will likely occur at the foundation level of the tanks should an earthquake occur along the Seattle Fault or along the subduction zone off the coast of Washington. These two events represent maximum credible earthquakes which implies that the level of ground shaking is never the maximum that can be expected. They are not included in the standard design values contained in the UBC, Zone III t. areas. In addition, the UBC standard for zone III areas is for a period of ground shaking on the order of 30 seconds or less. The subduction zone event.could cause ground shaking which might hi -last two minutes or more. The number of cycles and duration of shaking should be considered - - in the tank design. • We recommend that the structural engineer evaluate the effect that the ground motions ~ • presented herein may have on the structural design of the tank. This can then be compared with :the structural requirements for a standard UBC design. This comparison would allow a cost 1 evaluation of upgrading the tank design to withstand a larger earthquake than the standard UBC i? design earthquake. The city of Renton could then use this information to decide whether they i i,, are willing to pay an additional cost to reduce potential risks during a maximum credible '' - earthquake ROADWAY PAVEMENT DESIGN The following pavement recommendations are based on typical traffic conditions for this type of facility. We expect that much of the traffic will consist of light trucks and that occasional heavy trucks will access the area for maintenance. Very slow vehicle speeds are also assumed. G c o E n g i n e e r s 8 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 . I • t. The exposed subgrade in roadway and pavement areas should be prepared as recommended above under "Site Preparation." The subgrade should be proofrolled immediately prior to placing the subbase material. Soft or disturbed areas which develop in the subgrade should be removed and replaced with granular fill compacted as recommended to provide adequate pavement support. We recommend that the pavement section for the access road consist of 2 inches of Class B • asphalt concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock, provided the subgrade is prepared as recommended and that pavement construction is done during a period of extended dry weather. The pavement section presented above is based on having a relatively dry and properly compacted subgrade as defined above on which to place the subbase, base course and paving. All new Class B asphalt concrete pavement materials and placement should generally conform to Section 5-04, WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) 1991 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. Asphalt concrete should be compacted to at least 92 percent of Rice density. All crushed rock should conform to Section 9- 03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. The crushed rock and subbase where recommended should each be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in tiaccordance with ASTM D-1557. It is important to pavement performance that bacld'ill in utility trenches located in areas to be paved also be compacted as specified for structural fill. LIMITATIONS r We have prepared this report for the city of Renton, RH2 Engineering, and other members of the project team for use in design of portions of the development. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. 1 _ The project was in the design development stage'at the time this report was prepared. We expect that further consultation regarding specific design elements may be necessary. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that GeoEngineers be retained to review the final design drawings and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and • implemented as intended. • Our scope does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of explorations. Variations may also occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be .• included in the project budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation - should be provided by our firm during construction to (1) determine if the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, (2) to provide recommendations for design G e o E n g i n e e r s 9 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and ?i (3) evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with the contract plans and specifications. j -4 O • r Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. :.I Respectfully submitted, NI _ .,i, •i v;A A ab ` GeoE gineers, In . , }~� 1 , ^ lill • '� A. B McFadden, P.E. e 1 t'�` Project Manager P. 101,,TAL fir`.. .. ft6 ii.- C :... 1=: i EXPIRES 3/q/s7 Jon W. Koloski Principal JJM:JWK:crrs Document ID: 0693044.R 1 i • �_a • • G e o E n g i n c e r s 10 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • ••,. ' , .. • /. . , • - •• •' . . : . .- --- . •• 1 • • .. .••. .,• • . . . • •••• . ., . . • •; , .; .. ,.••/ • • :• ::: • .'. ••.' . • •41, ' 1 )I :..,....c „, ../::' .s,........:!.*'•.••': •••--" -• .• '""•• ' • 5. •.;''.:( .• / --• 7. •. >.'.. . •••;- • •• • ••• •• ,•••• /- -. : . —.-•• • •••••• • : .••••-.. ;• •...,, ••••" ',-''•• ''': :'...'''.•• ., : .•/*•:;';•••1.;;';..:" .../...:N '.- . . • •: • ••,:',',,....,Ij.% ..**7; '?:.'.../.'• '•.-' ••. - ' '`s. * 1 ': '*',.."'T. " ''•*::.•`-. ..........• ;. ;..........: .r.• • •! .,..•.' • ,•• :z, :.....' •7: ;I••••' ..•;(;;/.:',-.7.'.• • .• ..t•::..,':.:,..'•:'•• ..i: ....• .........; ' ',•.' . •••, -k . . 5. :i-•,',...,'••.i••• .•; • ..,• J. N...,- .:r... . .., •• :- /• .7-.4- 1- . .:•'•;.i.. ..;;•••••;'.. i ,.;,....• •••••`. ."•:t. :•••'. ! :•••- .-,i,• ...-. !..,,..." ,i..,:!..:,••••,..• . • • ..••,-:•.'"• .. , .• *: • ;• , • ' ' ',I' \'`•• •. •• •'" '•••1.'•••'L.:•••• ''• ...-• - -* -'' . . •• '•"- • : ..‘-%••• • -f I . : . . ••,..••• .• l•- '.: • ' •••• ' :••!' • • . .- '• —• ;" .:t•i. ... . . , •.. .. ...•• • . . . . . •.; . ., '• . • ••••••'. . • ..': . •../:•••••.,..••.' ‘ ••• ,\ " . I'••••••) .• ;./.'......'';:.•.:.,....,;;`,.t!'.-..,••• •':.•' ... ..:,‘•'• '‘.;. '•".•-: •.f•I• •,:,:. . .: " " '''f;••••;,•.-'%..•. • ,...: *‘„ ..... '..; . . ,:.. . ,......-;•. .';,:7,:.,.1%,5.:*• ••..1.,;;.:% iy, •- •••••E.: .,-,',•.'77",-. • •.'.•.' '/.' • "..1:;; • i•• ' -,.. ....-.-,.••‘•!.1. ...(• ..".,..•- **•.•:\ • ' • ' •••-: ', ..•...-.........••`...•:'..t.,:•;,:...":.•:."•,'''."•%.....;••.‘.: ‘.:1'. ... ‘ ' •-••! • . f"..`. 'it' •• •• . 4. •!•?`... .,•, ".'.: ........1:. :''1-•''; •: '`- .. • .• • '': ••• -; •• 'ip. ...\ '-, .... .......'„ 1/4. ..'''' • .. : . . ,... 1 ..: ".••, .,:;•'."'•:'';' •••;...... ••••...• -•; .1-.!• :( , •.• •:. • ' ..' '•••••••:•••••• : ';',* • . , • ...'::•;11%;..3. ••:-.•;1..1 • .: .;* ••:;:•5'... ...." , ". •'1• ; .1 :: 7 •.11. .: ...,. •-•.'• ••••. .•,..; :,••1 .....,... ....*.• •,:* ... .........-7 r,:.--,..:'•. ... )...., • 1. ^:.•,*'i•o.•.•;, ; • . • .: ... . ,.,• • ..• .-•:•••••••• .... ,.•• ..; , • •\ , ,.,...,,...!.. .:„. •. , ., .-,..7::..„.....•'.••• •• • • • •. ' ••• - , . .: .7..., :....,.1%. .4. ; • .--•.......• . •..•...,. • • • .... .. .7i., ,..... •-7....e. ••••••.:..*..i..iii.•;-••--)••••:.,. •'•,' -.,1.•:....: '••••.. • .1'..- - • •.- .. • . i•!•• . •• . '' '•;.•L. '••• •. 4••.- , ' f • ' • . •••• •• - .. '• .: . . ' .' ..'•••.. • . • •• • ) • c.....:•. ..: •11•••1 .• t'.. /OA.'• i,•••'!* ;*• .• .1,•• ' . - '.."... ' : . I. • • • i L." ' .. .. .•.....„'', ••• • • • : •• . • • • ; '•• '•• ., . . • 4. •••:ii.:z.:j. ,',;•••......1 •:..i . '.• '•-2,.. •••••,. •,'. • .. •: .••.., , •';'• . • .• '' -• , /'i. . • ,.i . . ' • ,•••-• •••••7• ''.•-•. .. .. / '/.•.' •\.'....i *' .'• •.., - . • e' ,... • • •• • . ., ../ • • • • • . . . • •.. • ., • . • . : .... .• • ,. . .,,• . • • . • • • 1 . 1.'.' •: .N • •'..:•• *-•;'••••:•. •.:• . . .. ••• •.'•.••:'•..• ." ••'.• •*.'•••••• ..*•:. : - • • ..1 ,..-t,i, e•"•• .* .•,,..' t ..... 4. .'..f• • .• . • • - I:•• • ••• i ' " • -•%.*,:;2.,:r ;.s*/: . .;•. • I..• : ' .. : •• . /. •' •,,..... ,::•.. • •• / -: •..... •,,;:.''i .... .7 ••••• ;,...• .•.... ' ' • : '1 • • • • -'' 1' . .-• i - ' ..•'....---• •-• •, ,. ,. ...; 1 .• i ••‘• •• .I. -: . /:1. ..••• .• .I:.••:. 0 ; . .....• • • • .''•''; .• . •I'•• - •:...!:'... .•.•,.......:••Z ./...*:‘..•;,••",-...••I';,..--...-1;. .:,....) .• •,.. " • ' ••::,:•,;. .•. ., . . '•->t.iF!!:',.•••'.', . :,;/•:4 c.;„::•., ' .....• • •*., : s-... ''' ..f.• . • ,• • :• • • ' • •.,• ... u-i '•••••..N ,'•,`•; '•'' ••'•::: :'•,...:". .. ..1. ). ••••••••'• • ": :. " " • • ... ''' . ',.; /1.:.L.,: t•••.••I • • • ••••••. --.6.-:.—"-'"••••: • .*. •••• ‘,/t.. , ..:•••'; .•*.s " .....Y:-••'. 2. ••. :..•••• \• 0.••,...\. ,'! :•-.'..,,'.1 ... • .‘ , •;.••,;.t...! ;‘.•:,.•;•. /.;•••,l't..:f,.. : ...• ..: •• .. 7'' • •• .. '• • ' •• V ..:-.. i••' j• ",••. •1 .' •• ••••••••• ..e • , * ..Ls...........;:-...;;••••, .1-: . ., .•••;•-••• ‘..•• :; .....: . ..: • . - • s, • ( • . - ,',.....:',..,.•..,.......:.. .••• ..,. ' .v....,. --• ••• ( ..: ..., y. • .i. • .... . „•,.,....••• ...1 -.••••• ) . • ...... •,- ;.. •..: .., ...- •,.. ... ... " ,.......4, .... 1. ..•.. •,-_,-. . •• .; . . ., ... •;.:.,,,.......,•••:. ;‘ - •..-I:•/.....• ..;',,1.• .... ! :. s. ... . .;. •• • ---- • • •:-..::, ••• • .•• . . • . " • • • . ‘,.• :.•.. .. ,, . , . . . . . . • •. . .. . . . . •• , . • . , : .. . ..•.. .• •--: .-:-.....i• • ••• ••... . •, . !...,--••••• ••••;••••,:::•:: i7••,,.-. : • ' .-•4('• ; . ' /: .1 ••••'. .- ,1..,•1.,T,.$,•.! /•• ;:.i or.. •.•••.: :..• .. *•' •I • . '' • ' •• :* ' • ..., ., • .•• ''. •:: ., • ,. . . •• 1 : . . •••'',K.;e ••• • . ,• ' • • • • . • • ,:.K.,'..:!7''• •' • '<•' ). ..•s'* ''' ' . . - • ..:•i , , : .., ..1,1 : •(..•s;, •\•: ' • • •:.••- ;''. '''/ ..••.1.r.i.,...;••:.:•,....:. .•!.•:6 !•.•. •1*i 7. 'k ; „,•.•.•1•. ,. ...'1...-, . -.•• .. . • . , ,•;.', .,•''s:';'•••. .• • :,..,.! : . , , ' i' • ' • in: ' • . ; . • /- , . . . *- , . \ .:'•' ••,•• •• ' •.. • t'' ' '.• . 'i'is ef.'•i•:':; •..‘•! ... ;..: !•••.k., . 1••••...•'4...'•••-:.•:••.••••; ••-. •.. • • •'•:'•*. • '• •• ' 7:'• : ., f 1; .r b •'1. •••••• ,, ) •, . ...• / ' ;. • ••-•*::." VI ' • . ••• ••• : : .. • , • •* • ..5 •F %.'•';0• ;•:••;...'•••.-4..• '''..*:•, ••: ••••'•• --.?r..• -••• . • . . ;. ::: .-- ..••_:.• •%* , . •'•••'i -..,"' . • ••• - e..". :. . , •\.... • •• • ..• :*. f , ,.• '• . ..• - ••• •.: :. ; . . :,v..-,...•;•,se'4,:•'i'e.4;••‘c••'•\-•••• ' •••••,•' ' ••••••'•,'•••'•:;•,•••• •,•-••'.''•-•sv. •••.• . , . .•:•-,..,1.:/;.-;• . •. ••••,•:-.. .;'..".7., :,.., :: '•4 • •, .. . ... . :7.. •,..• ; ;'. - ... ........', . •• 1.: • , '.: . .... .-: :• "•• —- .,.•s,:,..."...°. ) '4')•- ' .; •a'••: ••:'• s. .t.. : ,.„• .;:\'.' .. • ...' . ' - ;...•!..i.,''. :•... •/•••.••'..'. . ,..',- . '.. .. .• .. ,..;.. . if',,:.,•• : I ‘ : . '. .''''•I ,,.• '. :".• ..'• .. ,• . . ;.. ., ,••,.• . l , 1.4.. *•",•i••••••))/•:!‘::).P.'• '••"•:' •...;4.: • ,... 1 ,,',' ). ....!.;,:•.:,. ..•'.• •: • •• .. '\''':' • *- ' ..•'•`.'' ...• .., ' :.••:• '... . •,•. •• ..••) /"•: .).••.. .., .•,•...1.7\' :' • •'' • . •' .... ' . t • :•••••:•,'• . ••••• •. • -•'• % ;•• i...,•••4•••* .J.: •:...,••• ... .. • : 1 J..., ,.,. ,. . .,, . ...... ,,. . • ':1,•i''':.,;•'••• •' • . .-,! . ..: ' •• • .• ' '• .. .•'.. . , •f;i:c;•-!•1,.:•••••. ' --!•''':•••.• ......, \ •••• '..' "•/ --.• .. . ., : ...": ' ' •••• . •.- • ). •. ..• • ' '. •-• • • •_.... .",.•• ,'.‘! ..:"1.... •••••:if':*-;,1•., „. .,..j.. ."'••••••• 2-..,. ., .••,, t•,..' •:/ '•••\•:.•••••••• :: . . . I,:•••••-•••.i•: '..•• ' .0.. ••.**'..•'•• ••• • .)'.. . • • •. ;•-•.•".•• * *. C . ... 1 '',',:.••• '",.. ) ••: ••, ••. • • ••• e.•••..;•!..••''.-- ••.1.•i'!,.::%'. '...••.•. ;'•• ‘st.; ..•'./.. •: .k:; •••• •' ' '.4....: : ••••••-•:: .....1'• •••' :' '• • . A '-.4i;;•.4•''''....•• .. •! :•:".• .•;•,....••.. . .:: .-• ... •••,:.. . :•..„•, .,. :• .' ••,..•,.• •. t i' ; • •.• , • '. .,-.• ' ' •• •• • • :•7-'••. '-•'•i'',-;%: '..At bi;..:'.:' '::,'...".: •.'..;;••./ ' • • ..- .•;'• .7,- :... %•• .. • . .. 4...aVi,..:e:.1",•I';',',•;....../••'•i ...*•.1• •• ..' ."' ';:,::• '••• i•••• ••;,.,;,.,-: -.• ,t,,•••/ ....• .., •••; ''...k.,,;• . ...'' . :• •',.. 1 •• .1. :.• .1' .: •:' . ..••.:•‘• .17:•,k,.`•••••,•• :1-',•.'....; (-•.:•• 1. . 1:' ••••:. .' , •":•.'" ••-'"-- •. . .!,1./r.;,:e.•-):,.... ., •••:--....;,,,''.F)v. :•••--.,•..,• v 1'1:.•.• '.• %.7. .•.'i. • '....: :...'.. ..'''• s ' . . . .%.•....• •• .. '' ',' ' ''''',.•'........*:*•1.....y.,r...:'•'‘...•'•••':.'..;.••• . .s.-;,--.:i: • . .:.— . ..rIZ.;!......,%.;,.. •-,•ti-....-.7.-. .... .,....• ,... . •' • .!1 •... ••• -1•- .)...;., .: .. : , • •••••...-..--:- . •.•.!} -7• '' • • .. •- -•.• •'•,-7 ..;',•;•••?•:: •-.e.4:••,-1. , ••,.. 44 ....:1•• . . ••••/ /1.za.-ii-.`1 ••-• --L.1.. : !''.I.;:.",•• •.'... ••••..-7..::' .‘:1.; •'..% •• "' •I •.... :4, •-.,.. • '. ,1 '..11,, . .• i ' i;••• A,:. •• • , •• l',•••• ••• ‘. •.;'.._•—•_-: ''..•:. •-•..• • . i..: ...... ....... — ----- ••••.....".)•••,•••:;..:,• .. ;: •••; 1.• .. • .•4.:.,.' ••' :. ' '. •••vs14•ss.14.,L,,,,... ,. . . .,. .._........ , —..,. •••••••••••••••;41 P''''.•••""'" ..I:1; ...‘•''1 f•:t,!:.j% .'t.-:-;•...,., .. .. . •-.„,.04,,, po"....." i ;{ _ APPENDIX A The subsurface conditions at the site were explored March 8, 1988 by excavating eight test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. The explorations locations were determined in the field by measuring from survey stakes provided by others indicating the proposed reservoir locations. The elevations were determined based on their location with respect to topographic information presented on a preliminary plan by RH2 Engineering dated 2/4/88. The test pits were excavated to approximately 10 feet of depth using a rubber-tired backhoe under subcontract to our firm. The test pit explorations were continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who maintained a detailed log of the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, and observed ground water conditions. Soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the soil classification system shown in Figure A-1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-4. All soils samples were brought to our laboratory for further examination. Al samples were tested to determine their moisture content which is presented on the logs. 1 -. I ; .. 1 sr • • • • G e o E n g i n e e r s A - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 r . SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVJSIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME - GRAVEL CLEAN GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL 1 COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES • GC CLAYEY GRAVEL I,•s on No. 4 Sieve More Than 50% SAND CLEAN SAND SW ELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND Retained on No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY-GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND WITH FINES t Passes SC CLAYEY SAND 1No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT 1 GRAINED INORGANIC - SOILS CL CLAY Liquid Limit ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLAY , Less Than 50 1 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50°%o t INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. ZOO Sieve Liquid Limit t 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY,ORGANIC SILT 1 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS . PT PEAT 1 • NOTES: • SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. . Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. ' Moist- Damp, but no visible water • 2. • Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is 1 _ obtained from below water table j 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. • <1 O O c' c 4L SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM DO Geo�rEngineers — FIGURE A-1 o r _ . • L L)1. V( I L J 1 1 1 1 i - DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION .I (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 1% TESTPIT1 Approximate Elevation: 459.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots (medium dense, 1 0.3- 3.5 SM moist)(weathered till) 3.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles and sandy layers at 6.0 to 7.0 feet • (dense to very dense,moist)(glacial till) i( Y Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 tf ' Very slow ground water seepage from sandy layers 6.0 to 7.0 feet `^ _ Disturbed soil sample obtained at 6.0 feet (12.9%moisture content) • TEST PIT 2 IApproximate Elevation: 458.0 feet ` 0.0- 0.5 Sod and topsoil I 0.5- 1.5 SM Light brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(loose,moist) / 1.5- 4.5 SM Mottled brown and gray silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(loose,moist to wet) (weathered till) t I Grades to medium dense at 3.0 feet , 1 4.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) 1f Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 No ground water seepage observed I I. 4 - Disturbed soil sample obtained at 3.0 feet (15.7%moisture content) I1 1 1 ' THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. LOG OF TEST PIT Geoff Engineers FIGURE A-2 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (FEET) SYMBOL TEST PIT 3 Approximate Elevation: 457.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil • SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 2.0 feet(loose, 0.3 4.0 moist)(weathered till) . Grades to medium dense at 2.0 feet 4.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 • No ground water seepage observed _ Disturbed soil sample obtained at 1.0 foot (19.9%moisture content) TEST PIT 4 Approximate Elevation: 460.0 feet ' 0.0- 0.5 Sod and topsoil t0.5- 5.0 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 2.5 feet(loose, I moist)(weathered till) A 3-foot-diameter weathered boulder at 2.0 feet F Grades to medium dense at 4.0 feet �. dense,moist)(glacial till) 5.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very (- Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 - • • No ground water seepage observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 7.0 feet (16.3%moisture content) �yl • THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWNO BE TCO 0.1 FOOT,ERED ARE BASED TOO N AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND OOT. i LOG OF TEST PIT `ll Geo%•e• ers FIGURE A-3 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP --• GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION •:'i (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 5 Approximate Elevation: 459.0 feet 0.0- 1.0 SM/OL Dark brown silty fine sand with topsoil and abundant organic matter(loose, moist) (fill) 1.0- 1.5 Decayed wood and topsoil 1.5- 3.0 • SM Light brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and abundant roots(loose,moist) 3.0- 6.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(loose,moist)(weathered till) Grading to medium dense at 4.0 feet • 6.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) ' Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 ' - No ground water seepage observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 7.0 feet (12.0%moisture content) • ,, , TEST PIT 6 Approximate Elevation: 460.0 feet ) r- • 0.0- 0.4 Sod and topsoil 0.4- 4.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 1.5 feet(loose, moist)(weathered till) Grades to medium dense at 2.0 feet • - "4.5- 10.0 • SM Gray silty sand with.gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) • • - • - Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 . - No ground water seepage observed C..J . ~' Disturbed soil sample obtained at 2.0 feet - . (18.2%moisture content) • ,. . THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. 1 �� LOG OF TEST PIT Geo��Engineers FIGURE A-4 i LOG OF TEST PIT - DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION s, (( (FEET) SYMBOL - DESCRIPTION l 1 J TEST PIT 7 Approximate Elevation: 461.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil 4 ., 0.3 3.0 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gavel(medium dense,moist)(weathered till) 1 3.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) . Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 No ground water seepage p ge observed ]. _ Disturbed soil sample obtained at 2.0 feet (16.4%moisture content) TEST PIT 8 t.:.: . Approximate Elevation: 452.0 feet I 0.0- 0.5 Forest duff 0.5- 1.5 SM Dark brown silty fine sand with occasional roots(loose,moist) 1. . 1.5- 6.5 SM.MIL Mottled brown and gray silty sand and fine sandy silt(medium dense/stiff,moist to r wet)(weathered till) _ 6.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (dense to very dense, moist) ti (glacial till) ' Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 p Slow ground water seepage observed from 5.0 to 6.5 feet E" - • J . • 3•': • . il; _ THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. j -' a qv; . LOG OF TEST PIT Geo�'O Engineers FIGURE A-5 1` ------ ter•^..-_,i. _ YF''`�.." C: � SO -- --z �L"^..i�ssii ---` ;r i c-fs .5 3 Y •-4 re r E, kT•0N . I SITE , _. LEuo • QD Puget Drive S.E. - if �� < _ _. '• .f . ? _ �t ICJ / : 4.,-.•:„. s••',". v.--',.A4-‘. I I! •_`;(.Fe'(K" 11 `� �c- - .:' .,-•; .,\\ 4 rF ,. '; .1�c.ar 1 u qt.r FiL1 Existing Elevated \) \ iSJ. r ! .Tc.IV1I-::,.',',c f=.a 0 1,I.:1m F.os-1i„.:i.t-L'.74,r.Z .:e'.- _ x;v, •AIB L r . /. /gy* c.-- I Water Tank _ .: .u..:_...; ..,. 'g-- x --N,r,i;i, gli T P-1 \ M u w k. .f."" - t_ - i 7 � i • VICINITY MAP No Scale / 4PJ2-5 ) / i )IF &-- -------(1.-:--- / 7/ , \TP-8 v / 1� I _ \ TP-2 Proposed 4.0 MG Ground - Level Reservoir ! TP=7LP . / \ 7Proposedr- 9 \Pump Station 0 100 200 TP-6 \ - / TP-3 ) e, 1 /Il�,• SCALE IN FEET Sao h0 P, A �c• 0Proposed 4.0 MG Ground J / . o Level Reservoir o P - EXPLANATION: • a� T P-4 /• � P �o� T P-1-; - TEST PIT 2 i . a .\\. - / �- -� , 'P. GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION Nii ) • (SEE FIGURE 2) L • 2 . 7--- '-/ 1..".:' . Site Boundary- ` Y - i. l_ N v. • • . --....... - -. SITE PLAN ' leers REFERENCE: UNTITLED PRELIMIt!ARY PLAN DATED 2/4►/88 PROVIDED BY RH2 ENGINEERING. Geo��EI1g1I• FIGURE 1 I �� `!'N - - •• mil" T- V"• :•-.._ -_ !?✓ '+✓-o-c:�r• '�§?.?. :J'-;,,+ ..:� _•- -, ,�, , r•':<t'; - •[ - ,.'.-.- i-c-4,F- v r u - ; -C� ��'r_`.• -�xyr Q-.��. 1-'•--•- v.oZ .1�" ....t.. -'hti ..-.v-�i°' .i - r+7'�' ��`v' ��:�-�� '�,•^�.�' ...�v •' a�{r �• �';� .'.o. •7:i\ :-i. -5 _� �. _.J....-.T.''.• .�^�. %•'� - c-+� ;{ i . �.. '�';T.. .a .--.%j`�- ;,4 i :: -. ri�i {> ...: s �r "'. •••. ✓ Y c� `may 4 ;IA _c f. <. N 1[ -th' 4,--..,,,.,• , .. \; vsm N 4' N to w ; Ill w. I CL co O hp) p O ---I 460 • } jr / SM I SM SM -c-, / Weathered Till ti SM' ? S`- ` ? c .. • I H 0 455—� _ 455 0 SM Unweathered Till ? • 1 r_ 7-..0 a ? / SM __�� ? w S w SM --1 SM . . C Proposed Tank A Bottom �- Proposed Bottom of Tank B -450 w _ 450- _ • I n • - EXPLANATION: i _ - o_ TEST PIT NUMBER I SECTION A - A' SM SOIL CLASSIFICATION t (SEE APPENDIX A FOR EXPLANATION) SM\ GROUND WATER SEEPAGE . t 2 - 0 w in Notes;: 1. Refer to Figure 1 for location of cross section. �1 - 2. Subsurface conditions shown are based on 1 co? `i I c� widely spaced explorations and should be a.• O FaI H considered approximate. Actual subsurface F. . i_ I conditions may vary from those shown. 460- SM -460 3. Elevations, topography and proposed tank •_ - // SM locations are based on unititled preliminary plan �;• f! _ Weathered •Till dated 2/4/88 provided by RH2 Engineering. SM �^ SI t� m • o Fill / 'l ? U. • w c • C y SM - �` . 455- 455 oo o Unweathered Till SM • > HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1' = 50' 2Li.'e - SM ? w VERTICAL SCALE: 1' = 5' i. : r i 'SM / VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: X10 d Bottom o - — L Propose F •450- -SM 41• of Tanks -450 Y • ML / - • • fV , O I �7 I Y-SM 8 SECTIONS - B' �� GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS - Geo .e Engineers FI(;ItRF -. - • ''r 01 0.8 l -1 1 �. 0.7 ; 1 11 1 1 I I z o.s I I _ Q 0.5 — I , 1 cL I I I ._ w w ; I {V I v 0.4 fi' 11 p \ 0.3 1 U \ l:.! N . i c.. j I' 0., T ..... ., ._. t O `_;. •.' - -. .0 - ,1 . 2 3 4 5 6 - PERIOD (seconds) „J EXPLANATION: PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK . ' - ACCELERATION = 0.13g • {• PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK I `�• ACCELERATION = 0.09g — — - — UBC RESPONSE SPECTRA /�� SITE RESPONSE SPECTRA �/ SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKE Geo Engineers FIGURE 3 ►i. l; I 4. 3 i I 1 2.5 o . 2 I- o: W W v 1.5 - 1\ U Q J Q 1 i - f \ 0.5 \ l N.N. Iif o� N _ I - t i4 .- - 0- . 1 •2 3 4 5 • PERIOD (seconds) ' - EXPLANATION: PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK - ACCELERATION = 0.57g 7 - i PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK -11 ACCELERATION = 0.40g- ',� - - -- - UBC RESPONSE SPECTRA • SITE RESPONSE SPECTRA J Geo `�Enoineers SEATTLE FAULT EARTHQUAKE \N/ 0 FIGURE 4 • • • • it (. l7:•L �° 1 _ 'L.•l - . i ter, :�. - •�a. ' � �' ��' - .. .1,.�••' r. I � S, �. ., � • ;/• a P.' • ,I • �:•/� . ;fir.. !• i\ , I .7. a' `�'•i f:' /. •r 7'` /1. \ _• ' •{'( - 4 1. .1 • • • 'F� 1 I m ! .)': .\. ''• 1 ram!. • •L• •• ��•' • • • i r . • • • • • i • • • • .( •( 1. / a/ �,' ` ��• •'.,tom _•1„r• ;', 7 • • ray• ,� / ♦• 'r � ' ' '. ti ` 7 ' r.• \ .. �' • ti .. til _ a f • • \. ,/ ' �f • • Y• •• '• • r •• ' \, ■R •1 ; {{ - • 7 1 r!•"(.'1 '.I�r (1'�ry?��' • }�.-- ` _ ' .. •J' 1r•_— ��. �� ` ,r--.U.I'_ .t w��' ... ti I', t _..rr f...yr..,. '(�, '.ii•�.•• .. • 6. 1. APPENDIX B IC:1 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL GEOLOGIC HAZARDS COAL MINING ACTIVITY GeoEngineers provided the following summary of coal mining activity in our 1988 report. ; No significant research has been completed since then for the project area revealing additional l_ _ details for our summary. t: Similar to many areas in the Renton and South King County vicinity, underground mining l activity occurred below the site in the early 1900s. We performed a literature searc to 10. determine the extent of the coal mining activity that was undertaken below the site. Based on this information, we evaluated the potential hazard this historic mining might pose to the proposed project. A list of selected references is presented in Appendix B. 1 i - - The referenced Morrison/Knudsen report presents a chronological history of the mining activities in the Renton Mine. They are summarized briefly in Table 1. TABLE 1 Year Activity 1874 Opened by the Renton Coal Company 1886 Closed 1895 Reopened by the Renton Cooperative Company i 1901 Bought out by the Seattle Electric Company 1920 Closed 1922 Reopened by the Strain Coal Company 1933 Closed ir.: • - The primary workings of the Renton Mine consisted of the No. 3 seam. The No. 3 seam �i'., is documented to be about 111/2 feet thick, dipping toward the east at about 7 to 10 degrees. A . Map of the mined out area with an overlay of the project site is presented in Figure 2. It should be noted that there are discrepancies in the literature reporting the history of the mine. The mine 8 . records indicate that about 95 percent of the coal was extracted from the No. 3 seam. However, - - • a consultant report(Evans 1920) estimated that about 21 percent of the coal was mined out based 1 . on reported quantities. It should also be noted that our experience on similar projects indicates that survey data of mines prepared prior to 1930 do not have a high degree of accuracy. F, We have presented the,outline of a relatively large "room" that may have been entirely J'`L.. mined out below the site. The historical map indicates the eastern and western extremities of this large room were mined out; however, the reference map fades out in the middle and it is unclear whether the entire area between these extremities actually was mined. We have shown it on the . figure as the entire room having been mined out to be conservative. i i B - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 G e o E n g i n e e r s ►: • The mine records indicate approximately 875 feet to 990 feet of overburden rock and soil • above the mined out area. The relative thickness of overburden above the mine workings across • the site is indicated in Figure 2. The geologic map of the site indicates a relatively thin veneer of glacial drift soils overlying the bedrock in this area. We estimate that the depth of glacial till soils is probably less than 100 feet across the site. A surface expression of mine collapse (such as a pit) is unprecedented for a mine with this thickness of overburden in all case histories and technical reference papers that we reviewed. A 1 slight possibility exists that downwarping of the ground surface may occur over a very large area, especially if the large room was mined out, as indicated in Figure 2. The maximum potential 1, .• vertical displacement is estimated to be on the order of 2 feet or less. The surface manifestation of this downwarping would occur over a very large area extending well beyond the boundaries 1..; of the project site. A significant percentage of any resultant downwarping may have already occurred since the mine has not been worked since 1933. Based on the average 930-foot thickness of overburden, case histories, and our analyses, we conclude that there is a very low risk of any hazard from the previous mining activity to reservoirs located on this site. . ` SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The seismotectonics of the Puget lowland are very complex and not well understood due to the thick glacial deposits over the bedrock. The primary cause of the seismicity in the Pacific Northwest is believed to be the result of the interaction of the Pacific and North American litho- spheric plates, further interrelated with the smaller Juan de Fuca plate. The larger earthquakes -l - in the region are thought to be subduction-related with tension in the lower plate; however, the evidence is inconsistent. While the Puget Sound region has been subject to many seismic events, _ r-, the two major historical events affecting the local area are the Olympia earthquake of 1949 and the Seattle-Tacoma earthquake of 1965. The 1949 earthquake is the strongest recorded . 'earthquake in the Puget Sound region, with a Richter magnitude of 7.1 and felt over an area of `•' - at least 150,000 square miles. -The 1965 earthquake was a magnitude 6.5 event. Earthquakes - of similar or larger magnitudes are possible in the Puget Sound region in the future. It should . be noted that the larger recorded Puget Sound earthquakes have occurred at relatively great depths without any associated surface faulting. Two faults are mapped in the site area. We performed a literature search to evaluate the geologic conditions and geometry of the faults mapped with respect to potential seismic hazards to the project. A list of selected references is presented in Appendix C. Bedrock in the Puget Sound lowlands is generally covered by a relatively thick layer of J' '' glacial •drift and more recent deposits. This relatively thick mantling of soil generally masks the structural fabric of the bedrock and therefore very little is known about the fabric of the bedrock - in the Puget Sound lowland area. In the Renton and South King County vicinity, the bedrock is generally closer to the ground surface, thus permitting practical and economical mining of coal seams. Faults in the bedrock formations were frequently encountered during the mining. These faults were typically mapped; therefore, much more detailed information with respect to the G e o E n g i n e e r s B - 2 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 Ibedrock fabric is }mown in mined areas. The bedrock is of Eocene age which dates back about 60 million years. Soon after deposition of the coal beds and encasing sandstone, the sediments were folded and faulted by tectonic forces, probably in late Miocene time, about 18 million years ago. Two faults, known as Fault No. 3 and Fault No. 4, were mapped in the Renton Mine within the downward projected footprint of the project site. The approximate locations of these faults are shown in Figure 2. These faults are described in some detail in the literature (Evans 1920). The faults are described as being "normal faults," each having 7 feet of offset. The planes of Fault No. 3 and Fault No. 4 dip at 75 degrees and 60 degrees to the south, 1 respectively. Projection of the nearest fault plane to the ground surface would place the fault line ., emergence about 250 feet to the north of the project site. The 7 feet of offset reported along the 1 faults below the site is quite small from a geologic perspective. A larger fault located south of 1 the site is reported to have an offset on the order of 1 mile. L. As mentioned above, an average of about 930 feet of overburden exists over the mined out area at the location of the project site. No lineaments or other surface features indicating surficial faulting were observed at the site during the site reconnaissance performed for that purpose or during the field exploration program for the foundation investigation. In addition to the above mentioned historical earthquake records, recent research has focussed on two source areas for very large earthquakes: (1) subduction zone earthquakes off the Washington coast with magnitudes estimated at 8.0 to 9.5, and (2) Seattle Fault earthquakes with magnitudes estimated at 7.5 or larger. Subduction zone earthquakes are generally located at depths of about 35 kilometers and at a distance of about 150 to 270 kilometers from the site. - The energy and magnitude of ground motion is generally attenuated (reduced) prior to reaching the Puget Sound area. The Seattle Fault which has been the focus of recent study is thought to Iconsist of a series of four or more eat-west trending faults, which extend from the Kitsap Peninsula to the Cascade foothills. One of the results in this zone passes below the south end of Elliott Bay and extends east along the interstate 90 corridor. The fault is located about 10 I. ' kilometers below the ground surface and about 12 kilometers from the site. The potential impacts .of large earthquakes generated in these source areas is discussed in the "Seismic Considerations" . section of this.report. • • G e o E n g i nee r s B - 3 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • . \ 1 .. ! t • Oi :. (', ) '`. .yam }• ' •IL .r.' • .i•, y . . • • l L 1' r, i • • '1. ?t> 1, t. '.i' :r'.: :/..' {• . 7: .+ • • 1.• .sue•.: w•i� • i,` ./ •\• �:• it / .}• 'jl ..A f, .�,.4 .t" .n. i.,• �11 .1: �. ' • • • 11. + -- 1 • t . • • • • •may+. . . . /,.''-, ". ', .�•^'� ..i. '•'' `/'' 11' \-•i j • • ( •1 i ‘' ,•, } ` ) ' r f 1 { .•/ ( fir':^/. / h • • e r • • • • • • • • • / •I .J 't•: � '/' , :4 < ,' •s 1 ' ' • t. • '1_ •• L- 1 ,. ••-__• r -. •. _..... ( .., s:afr.:. .ji+:ww 7 r1 y 31csw� . ' —.-` ! . •.,r ..., " aa i a APPENDIX C SELECTED REFERENCES Atwater, B.F., 1987, "Evidence for Great Holocene Earthquakes Along the Outer Coast of Washington State," Science, Vol. 236, No. 4804, pp. 942-944. i Atwater, B.F., and Moore, A.L., 1992, "A Tsunami about 1000 Years Ago in Puget Sound, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, pp. 1614-1617. f Beiknan, H.M., 1961, Coal Reserves of Washington: State of Washington Department of Natural Resources - Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin No. 47, pp. 33-49. <' Bucknam, R.C., Hemphill-Haley, E., and Leopold, E.B., 1992, "Abrupt Uplift Within the i Past 1700 Years at Southern Puget Sound, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, _ pp. 1611-1614. 1 Dunrud, C.R., 1984, Coal Mine Subsidence-Western United States: Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, Volume VI, 194 pages. 1 Evans, G.W., 1912, The Coal Fields of King County, Washington Geological Society, ' Bulletin No. 3, pp. 110-114. Evans, G.W., 1920, Physical Report on the Renton Mine, with Recommendations. A consultants report prepared for Puget Sound Traction, Light and Power Company. pp. 2-5. Gower, H.D., Yount, J.C., Crosson, R.S., 1985, Seismotectonic Map of the Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Society Miscellaneous Investigation Series, Map I-1613. Ih nen, S. and Hadley, D.M., 1987, "Seismic Hazard Maps for Puget Sound,Washington," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American, Vol. 77, No. 4, August 1987. J . Jacoby, G.C., Williams, P.L., and Buckley, B.M_, 1992, "Tree Ring Correlation Between - Prehistoric Landslides and Abrupt Tectonic Events in Seattle,Washington," Science, ' Vol:258, pp. 1621-1623. - Johnson, S.Y., Potter, C.J-. and Armentrout, J.M.; 1994, "Origin and Evaluation of the 5 71-74. lit Seattle Fault and Seattle Basin, Washington," Geology, Vol. 22, pp. 1 Karlin, R.E., and Abella, S., E.B., 1992, "Paleoearthquakes in the Puget Sound Region . Recorded in. Sediments from Lake Washington, U.S.A.," Science, Vol. 258, pp. 1617-1620. • • King County, December 1990, Sensitive Areas Map Folio. Livingston, V.E., 1971, Geology and Mineral Resources of King County: State of Washington Department of Natural Resources - Division of Mineral and Geology, - ' Bulletin No. 63, pp. 67-68. Ludwin, McCrumb, D.R., Galster, R.W., West; D.O.; Crosson, R.S., Hannock, W.E., R.S. and Mann, L.V., 1989, "Tectonics, Seismicity, and Engineering Seismology in Washington," Engineering Geology in Washington, Vol. 1, pp. 97-120. 1 jG e o E n g i n e e r s C - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • Morrison/Knudsen Company, Inc., 1984, Engineering Investigation For the Renton, ( Washington Area: Office of Surface Mining. Nosen, L.L., Qamar, A. and Thorsen, G.W., 1988, "Washington State Earthquake Hazard," Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Sciences Information Circular 85. Schuster, R.L., Logan, R.L., and Pringle, P.T., 1992, "Prehistoric Rock Avalanches in the Olympic Mountains, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, pp. 1620-1621. Walsh, T.J., 1985, Inventory of Abandoned Coal Mines in the State of Washington: Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 84-6. I Walsh, T.J., 1984, Geology and Coal Resources of Central King County, Washington: Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 84-3. Walsh, T.J., 1983, Map of Coal Mine Workings in Part of King County, Washington: Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 83-17. Warren, W.C., Norbisrath, H., Grivetti, R.M., and Brown, S.P., 1945, Preliminary Geologic Map and Brief Description of the Coal Fields of King County, Washington: United States Geological Survey Preliminary Map, 1 sheet. F-- • • • • • • • I I I 1 I G c o E n g i n t e r s C - 2 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • . City of Renton Rolling Hills Reservoir Drainage Information Stormwater Design Site Design Plans Tank Overflow Pond and Control Structure Geotechnical Report Downstream Information �04 o f wAs�r��, 96' 4‘� 1 i 96 f ?N, °ISTOL G.�ti .,. sONALti ' EXPIRES ©/ LpP��R�`v�.,.� � UG 2 0 1c.,�:,� cteG RH2 Engineering Stormwater Design City of Renton-Rolling Hills Reservoir Stormwater Improvements The stormwater improvements for the Rolling Hills Reservoir conform to the standards and criteria set forth by the King County Storm Water Design Manual. A stormwater analysis was conducted to evaluate the impacts that construction of surfaces would have on the site's natural drainage. These surfaces include: the tank roof,the booster pump station roof,the tank perimeter road, and the pump station access driveway. In addition, the storm water design for this project addresses discharges from the reservoir during emergency overflows and maintenance drainage. The existing site conditions for this project consist of second growth forest, mainly deciduous trees,with dense underbrush. The site is located on top of a small ridge. There is no evidence of channelized flow or streams on this site. The site is approximately 13 acres in size and construction will only impact the northeastern half. A small drainage swale is located along the northeast property line and runs along the Puget Drive S.E.right-of-way. A water impoundment area will be constructed as part of this project to contain 100% of the reservoir volume in the unlikely event of tank rupture. This impoundment area will also be utilized to contain emergency overflows,maintenance drainage,and stormwater runoff. Hydrologic analysis and hydrograph routing using the Waterworks Program by Engenous Systems, was performed for this site to evaluate the impacts of the 2-year and 100-year storm events. The stormwater analysis was conducted to verify that this site qualified for stormwater runoff quality and quantity exemptions. This project is exempt from providing on-site peak rate runoff control due to negligible peak runoff rate increases. The peak runoff increase for this site due to this project for the 24-hour 100-year event is less than 0.5 cfs. Therefore,no detention is required for this project. Stormwater requirements state that water quality facilities must be provided for any new impervious surface greater than 5,000 square feet that is subjected to vehicular traffic. The access driveway and perimeter road will be gravel and not paved. Both the access driveway and perimeter road will be subjected to only two or three vehicular trips a week, when a City vehicle visits the site for tank and pump station maintenance purposes. Access to the driveway and perimeter road will be gated and restricted to vehicles at all other times. Therefore, potential for oil and grease contamination of the driveway will be minimized and no water quality treatment will be necessary. Runoff generated on the tank roof, perimeter road, and pump station roof is be routed to the impoundment area. This impoundment area has a control structure which discharges to the tightlined storm system through an 3.8-inch diameter orifice. This orifice is sized to drain the total tank volume over a 7-day period (3 MG at 0.66 cfs). This flow rate is substantially lower than the pre-developed 100-year storm event peak runoff rate of 1.67 cfs and closely approximates the pre-developed 10-year storm event peak runoff rate of 0.73 cfs. The downstream stormwater system was evaluated in the 1988 Pre-design Report. This report determined that the downstream stormwater system has a maximum capacity of 5.5 cfs. This flow rate assumes that all downstream pipes are clear of sediments and blockages. The control structure for the impoundment area will release flows at 0.66 cfs up to a maximum impoundment elevation of 456.5'. In addition to this outlet the control structure will have an emergency drainage orifice that can be opened to drain the impoundment area at a maximum flow rate of 5.4 cfs. This 7.6-inch diameter orifice can be accessed by opening a shear gate in the control manhole and the total tank volume can be drained in approximately 20 hours. REN/194.062/S torm-sum.doc - . . . N — - IQ .. ' ',........_ ) i I r i . . . ; . ./ ,./ . I C;i 0 . 1 1.. ./ \ . . . . . . . *---',1 ) 9 ..,.7..,'0 . . 1 .1.., . \. • I . \ . 1 . . . . . .. ..,, . .., s ••••,-. - .'•'.1 .\--, „ ...„. -,.,. ,..) . , Iici• . . ., . . . . l Len-sn.) st, 10) . . .. .., 1 ,-,b b ( - L.j...k . , , . 1 . . 1 ,, 2Z : °)3 4/-7 b 961 i .. ! I .. .!. i .,. . -0, , . VV.\ 0 g-z - -.--:- . . . . , ...• - -ix 091 , <A -..,..._ 1 • oil °it . . . / . , 0 nit.)5: , Q i 2 I• '',1 — \,!,- ••••. / . / / , . . . . . . . , ctry)N7 'Q) . . . . . 1 . . 1620 V i :: ': Q)7., ' 1.; i '.=• )1 • . . .., . ...- . ,•,' ( :-,.:1 II 0)c. ' 1 1 , . 1 .1 i . . : 1 , '-'-'1 -: .,) ("..; I...--)•.-:-.--- -,/ 1 "r) \ ,. i i 0. era,t.er, r r vai I-AV-C. SU At Iio-rAl s�-« 007r 1 / kr- (-)/� i /ham it 1 r r 3, 9 2 yr I o `�./►.r IC yr Z‘rl �uPirD Poa� �o►J or SrTE, /00yr FLowS Fog 17t Al �oors = 0. 2 `i`1 CC 5 u ) r T — too) -r'o -tAt, 1nU yr- F o Tog. " vEl.c)e.ci: 5 con,co-' LESS ccs T14ErCr. Fotz 51Ti' k1A , c [: roe. ()Ai r Y,FitAvo-rtUN• CKGSVIDM �/Ftst {��81.i PEAS[ r�.Vn/OCF .� E tiocK("AS .' 8/10/99 - RH2 Engineering Rolling Hills Reservoir Basins BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D-100 NAME: SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA - 0 . 45 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 45 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC - 7 . 73 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 200 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 500 . 00 ks : 27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 .24 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: R-100 NAME: SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 .30 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 0 .24 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: T-100 NAME: SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 75 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 45 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 . 71 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 30 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 0 . 48 cfs VOL: 0 . 18 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min Page 1 8/10/99 RH2 Engineering Rolling Hills Reservoir Basins BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: p-100 NAME: SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 75 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 72 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 52 . 51 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 500 . 00 ks : 5 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 . 10 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min Page 2 Site Design Plans GENERAL NOTES \ \ __ .. .� LEGEND h 45°i" ' -- _ �. i e, a sty \ — — _J /. 0s ,s• + S \ \ T ��. �. d day. . l': . r '3 e- — h�R '/ ''1F � - 'd .[7 a VL''d { 5 }- - \�\ �� C'hE2 .--.N ....-Lit,/liel"' •:: //// : :gik / / �'-CA-..C.#4 •`• Y d is, �- 1 � l Li.',...; ' , At ->.V / -:c /'_ �y el.,- IV'''. d ''. 1111.- ®d '• 'J f d y - Q ; I -... - 'LP Y.r "6 d. /.`r 5_/- '-�� -7 t Q. • �' �`�i' '^�'t t i' -,f- tse� d vJ9 j '�I .r• :—i>;�i ST d •s -3` -.Mr � - �Ca..• /. gZ t 6 •:y !• , , 41, :d • .d eys .e k ", 9•4 cA Sc• - • _3 1: SRE 5H0Nh.. ea �','�e =` •d te.,,Ya s:d ' % , s •E -Er!S.N;t •� - - :0:is, { '"'.?�'• '� STATION BASELINE DEFINITION < ��d /' i. ,t e , coop=L� e d `'a, .ti-di' ! Na �,y/ I .,. • �dpt j 1r ?;iN �EcC?p^y._ /'' .J• • .^ �C �: �, 'd �S 'Y �j'S'ta ^� y-1 ' 1 - ' ifEsMNNG:'.F 0�. _a _,. 1..D. .3849 s,.. / 4 •� p r, ,�',JY.R' . •f : ' 2 _iD'? >TA7CN?.1 7r { ''.,Y•P'l ' / ,' r "1/ _ '�g •� -F t 9 7 - %•\d SEuNf 2a825' ,305555?, t35�9 c s7---.... /-. ?I.Id r - ,,;,'a , .:iT 'fS `f •o ., -a s oNCr KARINQ / �` Sd[�.,r ' �i �t"tt • .. --.d -a e :� .: ,d .Y `� 1 I ,44 3_ ! 25 00' 54959'54.5*E / ; Via'.,.-� 'i... :., 14 �r k .Y?3d :. •T ....K r t �5,.,.C' NiD1)0'06.0'E ea • i AM ' a3e t3y I� :e✓ dy�7r,9. a `i „�d „� ,a ".•a - ?, f_ ' i 1 a -- a, .E ,r / e,t// ,i i s I n `= s . _,, K _ "s =i y o �Y a 3• SURVEY CONTROL ,;; �` d 3� e �:� s .t ._r ,t r- d b ,� M� -` DEFINITION �' t '"Na ;e• a �t , c 's • d d f :ra t��t /- -=• 1i p a" �." r: uoR Nr1@ EASING / d' •�(•: - -'1!• — !6� s? 'fi_d _ Y .. I SURvE ,.ON'T..f{ r G t_Ev:'1:.'v ' '!r' G d r'e ~:d d d RP 5 :Y ! I Q Patin `)2730 !?055at d7 .% p, . -e's .:� c• ?..-_ ;y •_ mid a /d•r?d i b r / �, ?b,/; , ",T °� r -H•S ` ,. a [-.' / 2 ..: _k. ii• ?6 �, d ?f QE !4,'fC IUARh Et PC�j' ;9' ., ,O.to i. '� I. -�:- Y '-`.. ,Y "rN .yd "ro ''id .n'-.,: ,7. ' i?2815 '051' _. / r. 7= ..p �,d '� ,Z d'?� i -`�' ,�.s� ..t �c �•d ;d '�G C,�,4 /- �d OD uGNI;NE`!' t72723.E3' !3G59020.:•' .5!'.e j^ / / 'rt e f b ?`D ^.'r-"f i•,�, ! }0 © PRCP�?i'=LY:NER :7226 a f dis :.';�w' ' � yot 93' '.i05815.!'f' r' ' 0 ' ,n ` •� ..d i't `aJf P?:` f" •`.Z ,�•3 u� `�V4,'at' . M. ':., d '•'1 Vtd -ni '!; !"r `1d d ' $ea d/ C.5 1' ,_ 7 PROPERTI'CORNER t7?937 aB' '305252.d / / ` •( '�t ,.c d�' tC :•i •• .iT• t^..t 'A dW- '�! f 4n ctO y3751 o / t 'a�S Y « e� :2•H Q R^P`R"CU84ER 2537.17' 30t92e 49' / ,d`c =S .�••• ^.0 •"Cs' >`�r ,• �' ,� ' 'Y Ji d./ •5 tN v _5 A►,F'L t� ili • '3 -M r .t ti E see 92 d { �• d'1f -.``3'-" c" '1,t c- • 'r? •, .� a '�gg ,N19 S /--• r �. .y;` '•A a ,o�- ',d--,•S •� t +' y Vi, d nd �0 �[l / -sa5e • v t �' ;d Y d d i� :�.•.:fY ' F.i <'•- t^�d-'. ''��yob• '1 ..> 4 ,: rr, ,i. 't 11.•:',"::: --,•; 'sf e. ..› t .e. -,y ....4 / E' •(' ._.-t ...* •-�JI " M• �'�5 < +a• / _ _ - 9 RH][W.:Mi M:MC,MC. y� $ -Yr_ , r c 6 i' •.�.'? .t_,c - - -` •tro.i/...._ca,., ! 's e - d ;m5' yy-a .. ='?,,ii,��rr•• Y w• d�Y m ..d _.. • .,• r' • ':N` .ftdeaNG OFFICE \'.';',, "►•d1 J L.td t•y V.. -� .. :1 •' u •.• 4' a5,4�' - a'S369.!bE ....• ..�•j .�"3 '_"1 `,e ' •'F- �i J! • '•'� w)C �C�. A7WTCMC► f� .S.;S_.�, _ _ `- _:�. '"�f Y Q•W,d j•- a: ••d ,�"_� 5,.e'-?b± 3 .:• .--r - ` 7� L.d`..d . ;- •� .• .a ,dam t o_ ,�y •,}1 I. •'-:� "�� '� CITY OF RENTON�-,`;� . z6. * �' '� 7 / ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR . J16�STATION EXISTING SITE PLAN EXI �VG�OVERALL SITE PLAN ` �o o � ' �- \ — _ �\ LEGEND == — _ .;,� — - F / x/ f:' _ i�., - - ?IGHT-OF-'MAv �„ / / ` C' ` ♦� _ \ IGH Oi-WAY CENTERLINE // a' -...� � �-{=` - �,.�- :- !,,. x \\\\•.\ STRAW BALE a AND ® c // � ,I�• �;i , ♦ 7 -- �� f. � �NrUFc r.JNyT r.A' J1l?CH. MONUMENT J / 4 , ♦\ .�- �' 'z cET.aiS`N' WC. CD7 0 PROPERTY CORNER // ./ft ,/,f .♦• , 1 ��. - , E.XISNG DITCH Air/ �.� / `/ `.V / ♦♦ ♦�♦ S,/ °. \ EXISTING FENCE « / ,// ACCESS GATE � ;+ \ 4. • / f$, � '/ rs - PROPOSED PUMP STATION - r. \ \ S. i '.XISTINC PAVEMENT AA / -i�f / / cTy. ',: _ '•O. °• ♦ :r� :' °'��__ _. .----•u______ �\ \ 1 \ N\ 'y ::::::::: I' \ \\ iv r . // °{.. �/ ! p2AS$AREA FOR `_.-' i. \ i' - - �X \`. \I ,'I1r: ! - / CONS1RlJCTON STApNG AND. 11 ,�' N. • � /• /O•/ .-:%� All --^�-\ �\,� �� e• / v/ / • / MATERIAL STORAGE - / \♦`. / rj /" -- �\ \ `\\ / i. f / • ✓ ice/ — �_��_• \ \ / ; / J ,7♦ / \ ♦\`��`\ `� /� EXISTING t'CONTOUR w 45 __ \ ! ��\\ �\ \ QSD / 1 �aa EXISTING CONTOUR yr / .H _ _ _ f /{//� `�` � ``�\ \ �:_/ f� • / _ �� „1 -1 �` / /'��f� `�::'M �� \ ` \\ "� .� /� - ^— --- CONSTRUCTION 1'CONTOUR • �, i`�__i..+ �� / / _ ♦, •i fY" - - f it `A `\\ \ �ii"� •.\ CONSTRUCTION CONTOUR d? / f,r,?_-- - / /• ' a { -:-�.� \ ` iN t j I i/ SEE D PROPOSED STORM \ \\ \ - r / ,�,.O _ ; `\ / \ �' � PROPOSED 494 ZONE WATER LIMN f -1 ..—-.__ / '�-' 1 - 46D - — • _ / • ``�...-\`. ��(/f/ / i ;,t' •!••. SEWER DETAILS \ •\' \' s ; \ PROPOSED RESERVOIR RECRCt1lAnON PIPE .w1 - _ _ _- // -i �'^—, \ \ !'X ` j j ' \ ) �` PROPOSED 590 ZONE WATER MAIN / / _ �/ / ,/ /� N\` /' ' , 453 \., 1 \�\`\c� i1 PROPOSED STORM/DRAIN PIPE *L.-- /�/ / �/ - - • i� ..• �` \ �' `....;; '' �i�:' \-... -`\••` - -\\' `\k T 1 PROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN PIPE • °,' / -• / ---�'+. pff (- i.!' � - '\ ) ! li I •1 h. }. '' I( PROPOSED POWER /- / 7/� -i/-. °!�� !'NJ .� ' \,,.\!` �\�-/ / 1( 1 R ' ( ' (/�� PROPOSED TELEPHONE / < T -ar- /' j fir; -/: t 1 j { i W PROPOSED CULVER EXISTING . i �1 / I I1 �i �/ ,,;4 -,,,, RESERVOR Y 4 /I/�/ �' FOOTING AND PE3LMETER `J •• ( ( t�_ .1� • - \ ; j i ( 7 I ! < 6 PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCING ..>...� { !!, :. DRAINS,SEE DWG NO C10 FOR I T I ' •••7.f�•" !' \` °. _ I /- "� i i i !Ili ,i ji! • DETAILS, \`�it \ L. ,{ 1 ( f( ( Q ,..�aornnaa,v..caaavccaowvoc- PROPOSED STRAW BALE BARRIER / .- \ s T O- O 1 I ��a�,► y' 1Illk\ p } i•. ,i }!'i i 1�c l �` 'i ' ' -• { PROPOSED RUNOFF CONVEYANCE DITCH / af.'.%� i�+•• ACCESS GATE • ..J I ii (� i:( - ;`NI( / / �'i/� • } `j i�., A�i.►.�i►ifs r4 �" f l(I i(( ,i �k� f. R. _' • °.I d tf PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS • C:i r.. . ;l4Ei.„i w l i! '�;; 1 ..=�:%t. ma's•, '•+�s �1 k i3 �_ r ed .ir. l e+ a* _ { i` ( I k. 463 :.(f -.i.�' "i.•s0••i II (( }-T , p' �� GENERAL NOTES / iAi; 1, \N / •f.).f t.. ' �-. - ` :\ 7' f EXISTING MT/LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE,IT SHALL BE THE J _ _ { '� CONTRACTOR'S RESPON5181U TY TO VERIFY THE TRUE LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID J� \ ' .rN� ►i1 N. r • �'� \ ,• / ��`��``\�\•.- - _ - _ I i� _ S) �t .t �.( I DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE Pt '<'_,' /; ' \ �••. 1 ♦ ♦ / / /�,� - '\�`• ``�\ \�? I' ttl{ ( 9'' PROPOSED ROAD AND UTTUTES SHORN FOR REFERENCE.SEE APPROPRIATE SHEETS A f N `\ \ / ♦ `♦ �n \N :1,8.%4k4.-.. .`,�� _ %X `\�� ♦ I I { ' d a S� FOR DETAILS. cn \ 4 r• ♦,. -- ._ ,' _ � �.� ♦ i • �56 i! 3 I-SALL CONSTRUCTOR STAKMC IS TIE RESPCNSIBWTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. TEMPORARY ST ♦ i ` O,ROADS'S i i 1—"l N. \\ \ { .fi."�1,� CON9TR.UC�N ♦ ♦\♦ .\ 1.- / \ •\ �'��''" / �( \ } S `-.. STORAGE OF ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IS TO BE CONFNED TO WITHIN THE S N0:C07 ``� / ♦ \, ``` '{' l; CONSTRUCTOR LIMITS SHOVM. :\ ♦ ---,/ ♦• `-_ lJ , •S. 'v '�� - PROPOSED OVERFLOW/ORNN b�` \` (I( { { -�.. ea > > \: ♦ ; DETENTION POND {I( }; { �3 a SEPARATE TOP SOIL FROM RENA WNG SqL TOP SOIL TO BE USED IN CONSTRUCTOR ♦ s^ • ` \\ G:r OF DETENTION POND AND BERM. SEE DWG N0.CG8 FOkR DETAILS. �'� . ' co rFa� • 'D\` 46 f' rats `� . M --. .._. .. .. 4`S.9 \\\ ` t��. ill ({ i YQS., ♦ -1 `\ \, i\ \ {( i( /// EXCAVATED MATERIAL$HALL NOT BE USED AS BUILDING OR TRENCH BACKER-I.. '.+r;14. 4111" sd$ ,EXCAVATION FOR \- \ \ \.. t { ' �'� ..t: ♦ PROPOSED 3.0 MILLION ♦ t`.\\, \\\LAJ �j (� \ s� {{ { 5 CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE All DISTURBED AREAS i0 EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION. .5;�. o - ♦ f GALLON RESERVOIR \ \. \ \ �\ `\\.\ �`- � I -'� R • . �L. [[[(C'15� \ i i %i _ :- - TEMPORARY SLOPES SHALL CONFORM TO AU.APPUCABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS AND \ - T _� t.N. '\ ` sp `\. -'i'— ? 1 _ ( SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC DURING PET REATHER TO REDUCE EROSION AND \ 96/ - ' '' �, 3 SLOPE FAILURE POTENTIAL .(v� \\ •. -Irk. \• �' - -_- -- - ( SUBMIT SIEVE ANALYSIS AND SAMPLE OF ALL BACICFlLL MATERIAL FOR ENGINEER C� n EXISTING SAND PILE \\\� J ♦.cf "-1 / �O APPROVAL. vlr �� tf CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE DETENTION POND FIRST TO PROVIDE A p ? \\\ �ra� 3._ �•-�- SEDIMENT POND/TRAP FOR OTHER SITE GRADING WORK OR SHALL PROPOSE AN cn u• 1 • \ pry - 1� r `� } ALTERNATIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PUN THAT MAY INCLUDE A SMALLER SEDIMENT rV; �" \ ; ^7 `•lf y /; PCMD/1RAP AND ADDITIONAL INTERCEPTOR DITCHES.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ,r Y.` SEDIMENT PLAN TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 46? j :` lit. - ? ti°- I1--- ca f QQ DO NOT DISTURB PEE BASE C`�,. II �.`" {a.As' tits' .Nato^3,,RAC AIG,mc. _'• CONTRACTOR MAY TREES SHOWN WITHIN CONSTRUCTON,UMITS SHALL ,. }e ./ 1i ao.tMicom e 'u'Z Ii - - NOT BE DISTURBED UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE A _ i f■ 'MRO.T�O. Z - ec °-. V "ONSTRUCT A 200•.100 CONSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION AS DETERMINED BY THE 1 t••- / . PfweoNotrnKa :. ; 4 _- - __ SECONDARY CONSTRUCTIONMATERIALI TY APPOINTED CONSTRUCTION INSHPECTOR. i-c1 - _ - I STAGING AND NEEDED - r°.� I G I c j �259641�88 i �- V Q "w~q STORAGE AREA F I l' - ) VVLWATCMIT ORKE lam : „ ` - - + d.��/i, • / 509.663.0150 ,a _ 6I PROPOSED ERg9ON CONTROL I �i1'� �� I L FENCING,SEE DETAIL ON- ',1!K A55 / DR BAR IS NOT AWING 15 NOT TO LONG 1.4...t ,L jc DWG NO.coT II / D 3.,SCALE z" v3 c, II fi° W. \. "�4 % � CITY OF RENTON �( a J � -/ FELLS RESERK ` �1 °'•k" STATION ' 1 �4 . L t --- ,, g R s ° ROLLING t i ► •. . __r.„,.. ,M, �= w . / A5 C � GRADING CONSTRUCTION GRADING&TESC PLAN ND ESC PLAN O MA N[ mom KAM9 WE AWL AN .i 1• fT 1• 30 __194.062 I RHBR-D33 i SDI I TW I ;AN 23, 1998 I SHOWN 130 I COG I 30r 47 FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOTES iet -- --- -- - --- - A. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURLHASED N A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT H8 Erosion Control Notes I TO THE LENGTH CF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE f JOINTS.WHEN ANTS [P k. - ARE NECESSARY,FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER JNLY AT A .,q THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE MSFJN CONTROL REWREMENTS AND THE CONSTRuGf0N,MAINTENANCE.RE?!a':ELAENT. AND UPGRADRNC•OF '1$M IS THE SUPPORT POST.MTH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP. AND BOTH ENDS F RESPONSBIJTY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED AND PERMANENT VEGETATION.S ESTABL'SHED.THE ESC REQUIREMENTS ARE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST LOOSE HAY WEDGED BETWEEN BALES REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 9. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SH A(i BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW T1¢ a. TO CLOSE ANY A40 ALL VOIDS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO•.ONSTRUCTiON. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,NO CONTOURS(WHERE FEASIBLE) THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPA( p A ,1I''t. DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL—.RPPERMITTED. THE FUCJANG SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF E IJ MAXIMUM OF 5 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND C/ 3�;:,. �_ -w TIGHTLY PACKED AND STAKED ),_ (MINNUM OF 30 INCHES)- r 4- HAY BALES - 44 A ?,,�, a THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHOWN ON T115 PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED.N CONJUNCTION'MTH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTMTIES,AND;N ' } - SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR'AOLATE APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. C. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED,ROUGHLY d INCHES AIDE AND 12 1? ��s i's: i-t .,.� " INCHES DEEP, SLOPE AND ACJACENi TO THE WOOD POST TO ALLOW •,H J s r` THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES 9ROwN ON THIS PLAN THE FILTER FABRIC TO BE BD IEDAC.. 4 f ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE • CONDITIONS. WRING THE CONSTRUCTION R; • i DEEP TRENCH- PERIOD,THESE EROSION,SEDIMENTATTON FACBITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED(E.G., ADDITIONAL SUMPS,RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES,ETC.)AS NEEDED D. STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL USE A*RE MESH SUPPORT V TO MATCH BALE IN FOR.JNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS. It FENCE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UP SLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS'USING ; -,, HEAVY-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG. TIE CURES OR HOG '_ _ THE EROSION/SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHALL• BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MANTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED :' RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINHIUM OF 4 FUNCTIONING INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE • BACKFlLL AND COMPACT SPOILS FROM ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. TRENCH ON UPHILL SIDE OF HAYI. ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION,INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS,WHERE NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 15 DAYS,SHALL BE 4R= a BALE BARRIER IMMEDIATELY STABAJZED MTH APPROVED EROSION/SEDIMENTATION METHODS(E.G.SEEDING.MULCHING,NETTING,EROSION BLANKETS,E?C.). ' E.IN ADDITION.EXTENDED INCHES OF THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTERL FABRIC SHAl1 BE INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND F STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE __. MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER PROJECT.ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. -:- FABRIC SHALL NOT 9E STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES AE; F HAY BALE BARRIER DETAIL WHERE SEEDING FOR IENPORARY EROSION WNHTROL IS REQUIRED,FAST GERMINATING GRASSES SHALL BE APPLE!)AT RATE(EG AT AN A .ANNUAL OR F.EXTRA-STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ELIMINATES THE REOAREMENT FOR THE WARE MESH 9.iPPORT FENCE. IN NOT TO SCALE PERENNIAL RYE APPLIED AT APPROXIMATELY 90 POUNDS PER ACRE}. 71SUCH A CASE.THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO INCHES. POSTS MTH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF STANDARD NOTE E. APPLYING. G. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFIUED MTH 3/4-INCH MINIMUM DIAMETER TEMPORARY RUNOFF CONVEYANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM ENTERING THE PROPOSED PUMP STATION PAD AND RESERVOIR AREAS WASHED GRAVEL DURING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE SITE GRADING. P: SLOPE H.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED DIRECTION. K. ROUGHENING IS REWIRED ON ALL EMBANKMENTS MTH SLOPES OF 1:1 OR GREATER. USE DOZER TREADS TO CREATE GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE ( THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE,BUT NOT BEFORE THE UP SLOPE AREA HAS BEEN s . PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. - DURING CONSTRUCTION.FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL CATCH BASIN INLET GRATES AND MAINTAINED AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT CLOGGING. F-. I.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH -RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGF_D RAINFALL ANY ".E SPRAY WATER AS NEEDED TO CONTROL DUST. SEE DUST ABATEMENT PLAN ON INS SHEET. k REWIRTJ REPAIRS SHALL RE MADE IMMEJIATF '.,Ti BOTTOM EDGE OF LAST PROTECT BORROW AND STOCKPILE AREAS FROM EROSION WITH STRAW MULCH AND/OR TEMPORARY SEEDING. k ;.: :' ,-:c =4, BALEWATER MUST BEM LEVEL ALL HIGHER TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES SHALL 9E REMOVED UFON STABILIZATION(UF THE STI:' TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED P. THAN MAXMUM WATER 4. 4 LEVEL -t- (ROW 46 61.655) G � _ ,�'_:. z'h .:o�-k.;;>��'�.-^„w �:�"";? �S' F #� 'i>,G ;'F E .. r,CF'"`-vr.: t..r= .,,,r DCAVATE AN OUGH,LAY SILT ENCE kk N TROUGH AND-BACKFlLLRMTH WASHED ROCK CR �+G RoI / NdS VH BOTH SIDES OF FENCE AND ON SURFACE. S ,- DO NOT DISTURB SURROUNDING VEGETATION. STRAW BALE BARRIER PLACEMENT . NOT TO SCALE _ -4.(;',.,,Lt. EROSION CONTROL FENCE FABRIC EQUAL TO )H %S`{c ...; L'- _c DOWN CIF-400E,WITH AN EOS=0.15mrn. XX�� SECURE AND SUPPORT WM 2'X 4'BY K Cr ' iii �._L.. -ASS?;Q-.• 5'LONG STAKES,6'ON CENTER,BURIED ' %• 2.5'. NSTM1 2-BY 2-BY 14 GAUGE . > ri`.A }-lIsw\-c:c-ls f MRE FABRIC.USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS \:;� ;W ,Q.-X' '-.., ..Y". TO ATTACH WIRE TO FENCE �� r, J $ �...4-1.'?,;... `�' s r _ R= 25'MIN L r.. •`..``,,:.\..\ `'•. i‘4.-7- ,LA P \I, �`�, fir \.::`. DENTIN=12 MN '�`, ;��" i TO 4.ROCK f. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE -� `l•�l\�\••iC\:••• • ONESTRAWFOOT MULCH,2'DEEP. • ;-\ ;'4:v�\ ONE FOOT WIDE STRIP UPHILL OF FENCING AND TRUCK WASH-PAD DETAIL `;Y . . NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL FENCING NOT TO SCALE DUST ABATEMENT PLAN - CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST FROM CONTAMINATING 2 ADJACENT HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES. ,-HYINROSEED AND STRAW MULCH - DURING ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK OPERATIONS THE SITE MILL BE WATERED INHERE OPEN DITCH IS USED. TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION OUST. '�` - / ', Mt[lYiiNi[R1NQ,INC. i .ii ' � I,ttDo.ihZ[bn V - CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST NOT ONLY DURING `a C0" .... .. __ I Y�._. ..... ._.._... CONSTRUCTION HOURS BUT DURING THE WEEKENDS AND EVENINGS HOURS `.. I.[W.720.t1032 ICE I.S' I ___ 11 - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPES THAT CAN NOT 8E WATERED DUE TO E N G 1 H E£R 9 W0. 2 - - 2 EROSION WILL BE COVERED MTH PLASTIC OR OTHER SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE PLANNERS 4IS869.IN8 -, METHODS TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUST 9 G I E N T i B T S uziUTO4[[OF MCt 509143.0150 NOTE: MAX SLOPE=1.00% DRAMNG IS NOT TO SCALE 04498 044�R F00000 - TEMPORARY SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAY BE REWIRED TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION '.4 RUNOFF CONVEYANCE DITCH DETAIL OUST .,; IF BAR IS NOT 1'LONG 0 1" 2" - CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT of �'%� NOT TO SCALE ECOLOGY OUST ABATEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS ' REN T ON --� ,,.':u.F,.:,.4<.0119F• ... . .,�_;.;;,y: ROLLING ► ON CITY OF LING HILLS RESERXOR:^' ` `;. ATT C l ttithg GRADING � ND TESC DETAILS .... Il[ RRlmi ..... ML AlIU ROT es o. ACT 194.062 1 RHBR-034 I SCH I TVR I JAN 22.1998 1 SHOWN 40 I C07 I 4 a 47 __ y PROPOSED LEGEND / • - i r `� •-•-•- FENCING .��. a - AA / - ,tiaTONS JF Ex15TNG..'IL nES ARE AP^RC / / ,<. - - - - - _-- - _ N -_ .4 / +^-/ �` S7r!TINE,6A' MAIN i +ER!F'LOCATIONS oa,OR "� -CONSTRUCTION zNAT. ,y. /. .y, _•' _4•-,//'\.\\\ _ 51,37M,CRAM PIPE f :�MSTRUC'14N. / / - -/ �% i \ \�\ - - ` - CONTOUR - _ - - _ SaNITAR•SEWER PIPE / l / \\\ \ - CONTOUR ELECTRICAL CONDUIT xE^WG NG. "'0�;•R S"tlRM jE AEP $ANI•A7• 1 �' /,\\ , xWER,ELECTRICAL AND ELUE�'PROPOSED i i/ % TELEMETRY :;TLtnES / +r f - \ \ TE_u_,r1 CONDUIT r' o �' FITTING SEE DWG N0. �,, FOR STATION 9ALINE DEF!NI++OrH / / -,'� ° ��, .. `� = ;� - :<. , ``r= PIPE AND G LEGENDS TOP OF VAULT$TO BE FUJSn WITH FINISHED GRADE- /' i • y 1 �-.----..--........../' �� t .'A .....-\.- 27.STA. 5+89.4, 113.9 R.PROVIDE: / ,ti, ,/ �� " - _ / / ® �\ (I)-CONNECTION TO EXISnNG VALVE,PROVIDE FITTINGS (I)-16'DI CONVEX VERT 221/7'BEND(MJ.MJ)WITH �' -. fr \ •��• //• // AS NECESSARY,REMOVE VALE MARKER POST AND THRUST THRUST BLOCK / _".y+. / ,47 fi /;, sb' 1 / i/ BLOCKING. SALVAGE NARKED.POST Fes+ _ ).5"A.3t85.2,17.i L.PROVIDE. 29.STA.5+89.4, 126.T R,PROVIDE: - - / / / I. ( - _ / C'F: - i. t , (1)-16'p CONCAVE VE.RT 221/2'BEND(uJ.MJ)INTO._\ ��' / �'4 ii < ' <C ( .r_ t 6'p 90'BEND.,MJxNJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK hIRUST BLOCK / r / F.' ./ / O� /f' . .c \. I Jc gi� \ - :�;? 5. '>'A 3+65.2, 126.9'R,PROVIDE: / .'1v 1 - �,: • _ q �E L 32.STA. 7+25.1, uL6'R.PRONOE: N ,.1q / / + - -- - �. , 1 - _. \\.® __ (;) 16 (r h1) (I)-4'DI 90'BEND(MJAIJi MTI THRUST BLOCK /. ,, 7 - (-- J' O- 6'q ADAPTER(NJaFL) • .. % ,t 1, (1) 16'q GATE Va1`ff(FtxNJ) 33.STA. 7+27.6, I39 R.PROVIDE: C-1 THRUST BLOCK (1)-4'DI 90'BEND(MJxNJ MTH THRUST BLOC( '�Hr?- fltx^ r //' - / / �'-J / _ \� 4J 7 \_�•,• - / _ C� til-- 15"q BUND RANGE'MTH / / / // "��- / }�-''�J j •\ b.STA 4+35.2,126.9'R,PROVIDE: ) . r \ (I)-2'AIR 51.STA. 7+b93, 136.5'R,PROVIDE. _i_ / • / / u - _r"._ •,, / •\ :': INSTALL P SASE&vAWUM VALVE ASSEMBLY, (I)-16'DI 90'BEND(MMO 411H THRUST BLOCK -�'=• i / / / 3, yam..-_._�`' _ PER RENT STANDARD PUN BR51 �� - _ 0' - \ Aft) • N •, 53.STA 7+69.3, 105 T R,PROVIDE:• ,,.../ ;/"/' •_et r 2 / ,--- / - _ 9.)STA;4+ (!)-i6'q 90'BEND(WNW)N1TH THRUST ® , - �• - `� O • f _ ( 6'p 22,/Y6 ENO(NNW) THRUST ( ) BLOCK - 4- - - /,;/ ... \ _� t J RUST BLOCK ro- 3 J� _ / ; 3 ▪ _ 10.STA. 5+27.5,108.T R.PROVIDE. 55.STA.5+78.1,105.7'R,FRONDE: - 19 ✓' 11 (i)- 16'.6'DI TEE NJ.FL ' �': ''^ / `�. _ t 78 '' • -' -_ t. -15'q 22i O-6'DI GATE VALVE(FL�AJJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK •/ ,+e." _•y' -" _ _\ - _\� /,� I /Y BEND(MJrNJ)08-1 THRUST BLOCK t ;� -�-� . / �� -�- %��' _ _„..--- FOR- -- -_ .0 _ - //" / \/ \ •SEE DWG N0.Y03 12 STA 5+89.4.T08.T R. PROVIDE. (I)-6'DI PPE,LENGTH TO rfT .. .; /,./ - "'t.l,`,'� �-......"...-- -.Fr%/ - ``% ! CONNECTION'. (1)-16'DIP TEE(MJafi) STANDARD PLAN BR24 gtOp'RTANT ASSEMBLY, NSTALL PER RENTON v? / y y TO BPS t -i6' ;' - �` �ti•. i '-/ / 459 + �_ - \ s O p GATE VALVE(FLxMJ) / T i .�_ _ .r=". .% _ � ' +� 457� it (I)-!e'q PIPE,LENGTH TO FIT 57. �� L/ /'a, / t // y _-_ .a* - _ - •%/ \ ` _ =```�_ \' () STA.16'x 122,g109E.E'(FLxfL)NIhI THRUST BLOCK / rt / / ''�r� _ iw'� '_ 459 \ 14.STA.6+54.6,108.T R.PROVIDE: _ ) /�' �'� `• _ (1 (2)- 15'q GATE VALVE(FLxMJ) 460 - �^� 48f \.�� ) 15'z 6'Ni TtN (NJxFL)IMTH THRUST BLOCK 7' �_' - y ® /I `- 1 -6' (1)-12'q GATE VALE(FL mIJ) = �i • '��. 'K /' >'./( ,^_,-��r _ // '�'O �'' 481E ��.� \�.\`\`\\• '/Y I /' (�)_5'q PIPE,LENCTHt TO /f/GG/ • _ FIRE 59.STA.5+26.9, f05.7'R.PROVIDE: / G-�I� / .// /'' \f_� �/ - - • / i- '`� `�� ` \`''\ - STANDARD PLAN BR24ANT ASSEMBLY, E R INSTALL PER RENTON (1 • -16"q 221R'BEND MJzNJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK Y 15.STA.6+62.t, R.PROVIDE 62.STA.4+84.8,123.1'R.PROVIDE: r✓ .-//'/`/ i_` `\ -- / •/ 46j / //" tat' � %%'� 4. �-=`�ti`�\ •�- •,,'\ -�.�/ S --i / `l / A� �i"'"� ---___ 4�' �, '. \ _ ,- - /• (I)-16'DI 221/2'BEND MJAIJ MT! 'THRUST BLOCK .g.' ++a!!! �Q` / s •/•� `` w�a ``1. \ \ `..� (1)-- 16'DI 45'BEND(NJxMJ)MTH THRUST BLOCK ( ) " \~ / O / // • 41, - '� ` •/i f -�1 -'d-T �•'• \ 1/1 I-- 18-STA.6+92.7,139.3'R,PROVIDE: 64.STA.4+68.0, 123.1'R,PROVIDE: ,/ 7- % `te �� j \ \ 1 1 / '''% �6' �® -;;\H``\,� ` \a.'� _^,� (I)-16'q 45'BEND{MJzNJ)WITH THRUST BLOCK ()- 2'x 15'q CROSS(NJdIJ) / �A 40 /, • ` (2)- 12'DI PIPE,LENGTH TO FIT `V '*Il,�> -_ _ i (� - •-'�-- �•` '•. \, •% I 20.STA. 7+14.3,139.3'R.PROVIDE: (2)- 12'DI COUPLING QV_ /' i'� / _ *i" /' /Y `�- / \/ \"� �\ ` •I ) (1)-i6'q TEE(FLxMJ) OI-16'q PLUG M7H THRUST BLOCK .- // l i (I)- q ADAPTER(NJzFL) OCK • /y-^ I /'` a yi� �� h\\�\ \--...- (I)/ (1)- I6'x 4'DI REDUCER PRUDE: 66-STA 5+42.9,37.2'L,PROVIDE: '//' / (51 AjQ^_ / �. �, ''•., _ - - \ �� \ \`�\ \ ! 12'p CONVEX VERT 45'BEND(MJ;d.1J)MTH THRUST _ _ \ 22.STA 7+14.3,214.0'R,PROVIDE: / :��.. ® /J.// '/� `/ (1)- :6'q TEE(FLxMJj '\ i >/ :'�`J" J/ `� �_\��\� (I) STA.5+42.9,44.4'L,PROVIDE: 457 Yam." a, / h 6' A" _� /I �' '\ \ (I) 12'DI CONCAVE VERT 45'BEND(4.104J)MTH /., ' a ..'. \ F= / 1 J/ / (1)- �5'q GATE VALVE(FLAW) ! 1 /•' RESERVOIR OWLET, \ `` (1)- 16'q ADAPTER(MJxFI) THRUST BLOCK '/ / 11 -� ` /! •C .i '�..\ ® t /H f / / /�//� R - - SEE DWG N0.452 �•\ . 1" l \ 3 f i f i // t ESERV R INLET, _ 1 24.STA. 7+32.1,214.0'R.PROVIDE: 70.STA.5+4.6 2 98.7'L,PROVIDE. ` \ O - - ® j 1 j H / i 1 /f / SEE DWG NO M52 \ j \\. i 1 (1)-16'DI 90'BEND(MJzMJ)VAN THRUST BLOCK (1)-12'0 TEE(Fv4AJ) <U i j ?�1 '1 ;( \ • i i / (2)-12•DI GATE VALVE(FLAW) \/ \� 1 I ' ( 1 /1 / \ j t I / (2)- 12'q PIPE,LENGTH TO FIT V o /j, .% ! ! . ) , ! t7 7! \1 i ti { (2)- 12'p COUPUNC ai ;', /: Tx ',1 \ O -.-H >, �.J.�. ( • 7 , 2.APPROX 15 LF of 16'DI PIPE \/\V C}7 4..' A -- { . % - � ��p •. •�- I 23.APPROX 17 LF of 16"DI PIPE /2 ' \� s ,I \ - 1 j L 1 /�( I• fr. ® II. ��. 56.APPROX 35 LF of 16'DI PIPE ,, , 1 ff 1 1 J �a� �ea 4 APPROX 144 LF of 16'DI PIPE Z5.APPROX 31 LF of 16'p PIPE t 58.APPROX 13 IF of 16'DI PIPE s+ ' 1. ` I I 1 i, .1 )t) l • RESERVOIR OVERFLOW/DRAIN f 1 _•_ \ d yh 1 a 1 i, .� APPROX 98 LF of ifi'DI PIPE j ) y 1 PIPING.SEE DWG N0.'M51 i /' /\\ T 1\ L ` _ - - 61.APPROX 45 LF of 16'DI PIPE •'•i >% / - / \ ` _ ,�/ ® 'l 1 i ' `� ;t 1 j 26.APPROX 48 LF of 16'p PIPE ` ` , ) _ 1 9. APPROX 47 LF of 16"DI PIPE 63.APPROX 16 LF of 16"DI PIPE ,. ® ® '\ , V , L.‘,1 \t� ! , j !r 1 • I \. 2B.APPROX 1 J LF of 16•q PIPE t 1`' • f ` / it 11 APPROX 6t LF of t6'q PIPE 30.APPROX 10 LF of 16'DI PIPE 65.APPROX U3 LF of 12'q PIPE ' •f tJ j;; `. `.-- \ t - 13.APPROX 65 LF of I6'DI PIPE 31.APPROX 135 IF of 4'q PIPE 61.APPROXr 10 LF of 12'DI PIPE i-fil „o/�` .` j `\ ; - / 1 34.APPROX 11 LF of 4'q PIPE 69.APPROX 54 LF of 12'01 PIPE 17. APPROX 43 LF of 16'DI PIPE 50.APPROX 12 IF of 16-DI PIPE /, , 1 •-•. \ ,� �.� � \ ''\.,,�`` • •�� i• 19.APPROX 19 LF of 16'DI PIPE 52.APPROX 30 LF of 16'DI PIPE y� f ' k �� '+�N\ •_ 21 APPROX 74 LF of 16'DI PIPE 54.APPROX 191 LF of 16'f \ © - _ _ _ '�/ `\ \ �.,� .�/ � /�`� DI PIPE ;71 [,Q lit' / ° \ / ?. - - -'':'''� \ \�\\ �r. •� dh £`'t^_ c0 .\ f \ \-� �1� 77-5 j - .. FHa elmiv><em�q!ree.�f •'-N_'t=• .Itz /• \\\•�- �� 5 �_ • 1.eoo.lm.eosl ems~ ,' t - \ 46 `-" 1 46, /'/ \•\ `\\.• �.` �- 458 _i__ _ _:Iiramravirim !1lO�MDMDomc 539.663.015) Q `Q \ �� 41SB641 �� .Lr ^` \ / 'yr \• �\�.� �_ a60 - MEM ! t+r uTCHe[o►nci s�Q ' \•�_` - �� / CRA'MNG IS NOT TO SCALE 1L O J \ \ . , WATER NOTES IF BAR IS NOT 2'LONG D T^ 2" PPE• LENGTHS ARE MEASURED FROM �F rr FlELD CONq TONS FlTTNG FITTING CENTER UNES HORIZONTALLY,ADJUST LENGTHS A$NECE$SAR'''OR jj ly`j� �7�T ....7i WSJ ..a++xavl� �� \ \�•. LOCATONS ARE MEASURED AT 1HE NTERSECTON GF CENTER LINES ' / ROLLING HILLS RFSER a Is tk rg(� CUT AND REMOVE ABANDONED WATER MAIN AS NECESSARY TO!NSTALL PROPOSED WA 1ER MAIN �J/�� ' IATION ' \\\ EXISTING SAND PILE � � �i" ' SEE RENTON STANDARD PLAN NOS BR26 AND 8-22 FOR 'THRUST BLOCKING DETAILS !, PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 1 $HALE ROOS TO BE HIGH STRENGTH LOW ALLOY STEEL.ASTM A242.COR-TEN SUPERSTAR OR EWAL PER arY ''��' e•` UTILITY PLAN 1 ..= OF RENTON STANDARDS a oo mew,ccxm o,i 194.062 40E ROT OKV. sal 1 '0 I SCH TAP JAN 23, 1998 MOWN 20 CO3C r 5.47 ' r. 'r V T / s Ti. .,.,. , _-: ;:.•,..._, 5,5„,:::-K.i..---.-- ti,„*... - \ N.: ' '''' '. :\ .., '',\i,\. 'N \ Lk'. \ / / ,./ / .,' ,..-i,-„;- \• N / - -_ % / - 4\ ` •� - �/' i,f' "'�.�-- 455 ` * . ` \\ \\\\\\\\ \ -- ‘/,,/ 6/ / 6/ -.....„„, ..,./.."\,/ \ N ,,,,,, / ... \\ /458 / \ �. rJ 1 • —�, \ \�\ \ �\ \ QS '`.fir_� ,% \ — \ i /�//"'r' ��— `_---��N\ \ \� \`� `\ �\ C Yt, • , / \ _- —L, \/ \ 7/ '/ / f`/// as ``\\. \ \\\ \ \ \ \. AAA jy4- a' / • _� a6J .;.� - // ! ,it _rj i I rt t ! \'� �' 0,\ , co --.--- 74, • %/ / _ __i % --ice - `=\ `\�� __._.y• -l' • ©! j ! ••,It• ,J,/1 0 ` \ \ %/467 i %��"�/ ' - �':�\ \ ` I - ' / i.J )1 j//l - - 4J \� `\\ \ \`` g \ ;{ \ S.G}2 -_ /_ _ 4 / `_ — -_/ / •//' _ '`-`'\`' �\\\,\\ N---:j I c �`` • \\ ` \`\` ,`' \`� ,� -�• ;.1 1 ``;I ;1 II' _ I. Lily i. - _ / .gy, ,,. ... .,....p \.` � '� \\`\`'., `_✓ �i,1��! j ( { ! -- -- = l i , 7, � Lill/ 4 `/ 7 j /. / / RESERVOR WTLET..� , \ / f �� t j I 1 -� �I co �j ''i+ 6Q "� t -LT.," I/j��// — _ SEE DWG N0.MJ52 O9 \ I��\ • 1 J r n 'a t I t i'n \ ,Z , i i ! I7 \\-RESERVOIR INLET. \t`\ .\ ' N T t �` ' 2 ! J J I 11 1.,', �}. f j SEE DWG NO N52 L { ( t I` } 1 f ,,� l l i i , { i I { V/ - i i ?1r 11i If r,1. •0. \ i i ' { tI S7r JI i1I ! • 't (• f.,• f f:/ j • 1'; 1 it' ••1 i•-• t--1 I lEi' ' ' I '?'- 1 lt t 1 's 1; �- l? I• • • i� �a.r�i�•�s,I• r' N., s a i 9 i 1 J l -+' 83 I i _ is co (� 5q + i'i IIOY.31ls� f ; ! t }_' r • 7�. Ig 1�, ��. I y ��, H• i a? i 1 i , i t �ji!ij �ji�j�Nji4•�j !!H� `' :+ j v r- 1 i 4b3 ? _ ; tj if P lI .\ l L RESERVOIR OVERFLOW/DRAIN 1 / I ! t •' .i /_____ \_:_,A 1 t , ` . sr i1 // . } `` \`'� '1 ff' } I tisso O / . ` 1 i ? / \ �` t-. — i i 1...-`{ i } �i/nl\� r O '{` ,` ;,+< \ ,1 \ RESEP.VgR WALL ij i'f ��` �.. i ff ( I j l \� � �� ` � `- /� •r �� \\': 455 ? ! � { t "( t = 1. 11 .` O +a i n a6 ® , , r-- t s h I , f/// ` \� \ ji+f • '\ ,1 / ' \ 7'. ' 1 SANITARY SEWER_ `. .` NN:\\ 1 f f I� `` 1' Qs r ,T1 ` \ `\ { — SEE Dwc No.cn �� \\, I t fI II J l ! `� _vr I 4'Pqgylq \. - _ .' ^ \\\�\`\ \\'�•� \- �''� lam'!_ _- fro''''N,:.*:1.„ss\N ` _ _ _- _ l } l 1 I� I >�, t y . lNN ELECTRICAL & TELEMETRY PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 2 STORM SEWER 1'=20' A.CENTER LNE OF 550 RESER',OIR POWER SERVICE CONDUIT TO SE ABANDONED AFTER PERMANENT SERVICE==CM RANEL 'LTN-LIMP STATION•S NSTALLED AND S=,;L_. PROPOSED LEGEND 1.PIPE GALLERY FOOTING DRAIN. 4'PVC PPE.SLOPE TO DETENTION POND AT 1.5%I6NIMUM.DAYLIGHT 13.PPE GALLERY FLOOR DRAIN DISCHARGE UNE,APPROX 128 LF OF 4'ABS PIPE 0 2%SLOPE _PERAION AL INTO POND AT I.E.=446.00' TERMINATE AT DETENTION POND 0 IE= 445.77',INSTALL A 4'NDS ABS BACKWATER VALVE TO FENCING PREVENT BACKFLOW, SEE CM NO.S01 FOR CONTINUATION UNDERNEATH BOOSTER STATION 3 :EVER LINE -c PO4LI4.- SERVICE FELLER CONDUIT P=V'D BE-A=EN T+E TRMNJA'53J 30r AND -E'-.PtiSEC 'E?`ACE ='-`J,F::-vE- •,E_ ',NEAE :IA�;:AN ;, _ 2.ROOF DRAIN DISCHARGE, 4'PVC,DAYUGHT TO POND t,R DESCRIPTION _ I I GRAVEL ROAD DETENTGN POND '4% — *N2[egwrcama,mc. _. - N_ !'E... .A _.,I[ I'A,)- �E AEEv .-�...._ -RANEE AND �-E C-'� SEE :NE �___ 3.POND DISCHARGE,12'HOPE,CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BARN AT IL =443.62'.SEE DYJG NO. - _ eta//..¢Aicam _ _ - .- NEC AM CA;'J.i __ .F SEE:PP-CI.-C I.CONTOUR maao.M,Lcan C08 FOR CONNECTION AT CONTROL MANHOLE aibo.TpeosZ -- i CONTOUR - tr.' __ J- _ S+,C 1,E En,NG 59S EE ,._R=.- _EL ' •_ •_ „e•E-CAER'_AN CAC:',! E73=:Q :EINC'.CT_R CEUCRP'CN 494 ZONE WATER MAIN 4.STA.8+55.9,362r RT.,OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE,SEE DWG NO.COB FOR DETAILS. Ininian=111MII %ED110t10Off= , E ' n _Y,- To RACC A. _., M ,__ , e,A DIE=SIJNAE ANC L___'?.:� . _:,•d.NS. }N•„•;NO.=;A:;p•-147•E.ATEN RESERVOIR REryROJLAION 425.l61LNB6 ,,..5_P A'-,_,N, 590 ZONE WATER MAIN 5.POND DRAIN,APPRO%. 35 if OF 12'HOPE,SEE DWG NO.CAS FOR CONNECTION AT CONTR01. Witariragintinli 4YENATC EE C1fICE STORM/DRAIN PIPE MANHOLE AND DETAILS 509,543,0150 =.F. T-,> ?Pv„JAION BOX =CF "T_?V',A'E, E,;Ee;EA,'' -_ _ _._ - t, - --^r, - — — — - SANITARY SE'AER PIPE A r R. wpP,.'-_ ..{A N _ :ENTER :_y:. _ T., _•. ,C, r,:"aL.EO 3'P_CE'^,�F_? SEE x- +'"c ;N'ME-O 1,J Se.n:'J Y 'n_.CN 'e6.STORM QILVERT, APPROX.20 LF OF 24'CAIP. 4.OPE TO POND: NW IE=45150'.SE IE=453.70' IF BAR IS NOT 2 LONG 0 1•. 2' DRAWING IS NOT TO SC _ ELECTRICAL rOJDUIT r -L- �x� _ E_ — TELEMETRY CONDUIT 7.STORM CULVERT,APPROX.40 LF OF 24'DAP. SLOPE TO POND: NW IE=454.00',SE E=453,60'. RESERVOIR FOOTING DRAIN OFCITY RENTON ON E - '- 1 1'P,�CD:i:.:IT-0-HE PR,^.PCSE E _-.-._ - __ - _-.+,E°=LAN,;AS N EC EDP CCNCNC'CP:cS?-P"GN SEE DWG NG E51 F.F &STORM tZ1LVFRT,APPROX 20 LF OF 24'OAP 30PE TO POND: SW IE=454.00',NE IE=453.80'. i_-1': �'l-_=ICP AND E,%P,eP.:5h'1NG - -- - - - - - (GENERAL NOTES L c ROLLING HILLS RESER R:�' ►`6' STATION I I 9.RESERVOIR FOOTING DRAIN,4'PVC,I%MINIMUM SLOPE,DAYLJOIT TO Dm+5 PI S \-, q \ /x 1 LOCATORS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. J))L•'4 `11�`V u ARTY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CcNJSTRUC'ION ''D RESERVOIR PERIMETER DRAIN. 4'PVC, t%MINIMUM SLOPE,DAYUCHT TO DITCH 5 PLACES. � UTILITY PLAN 2 SEE DWG NO.CO3 FOR THE PROPOSED'WATER UIL'TIES.' It STORM CULVERT. APPROX.60 LF OF 12'CMP.SW IE=44&90',NE IE=449.50' SEE NC UUU VVGL/ SEE DWG NO .01 FOR STATION BASELINE DEFINITION 12 STORM CULVIIt APPROX 38 LL OF 12 CMP SW'E=449.00',NE IE=44&6Y. SEE DWG Np I A T, xsun R aPiP TW o3, Hut rt PC10 Pe 194.062 �RHBR-D43� P,P J PR� JAN 23, 1998� SHOWN I 201 C10 � 6a47 APP_.MEADOW SEEC MI: AS DEFINED Hi THE r:NG :IX.MT,SURFACE NAIER DESIGN MANUAL. AT 120 POUNDS PER ACRE FERTILIZE AREAS PR!CR Ti)VEERING AS REAIIRED JVERFLOW GRATE SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET -41 24' 1-- + ` 'N r:,ttp ;7-AL. RE_STABL iHED FOR WNINL'4)F':NE MONTH PRIOR TO FUJSMNG:A DRAINING ANY'HATER FROM THE \ / /QUARRY SPALLS • 3 CONTRACTOR SHALLL MA,N-AIN ALL HYDFOSEEDED SL.�PES AS NECESSAR- SUR'Nr l[-� — A 4;S,c OTHER FORMS OF EROSION SHALL BE PRCMAPTL!REPAIRED AND RESEEDED -- = - f TOP OF -MATERIAL -GMPAC ., �.. 6'LANDNG - _ 4 PROVIDE 3'.0.090 GAGE SUPPORT BRACKETS FINAL GRADE — _-. - - _ I ANCHORED IN CONCRETE WALL 0 6'O.C. ;A STING GROUND SURFACE— 3 \\ i'` y� 51X 3 I, 1 �\ :,ds<�: �1. A\fit.'.. V ;f 4t../. R r' I t — - _ �, _ _ _ — _ — _ _ rt``.1, ..,. ..,. "Lr Fpsdy+� _A ,1` c9• 4y'� } 46.:4 POLYPROPYLENE ENCAPSULATED • '- ,7,14 4,-T y.- ,7 13T,4,...1y' .T•94:-.<1-�'x.�..4,., :-.:.'+tw"t f DEBRIS BARRIER.SEE HIDROSEED ENTIRE POND, ?-' j;:•%• :`-` SFr°'n��`~"4-,A y tR..i;r.A•14,L STANDARD PLAN 8047 FOR MANHOIt STEP. INSTALL PER BERM, AND ALL OTHER `•R..,•„'�'F* •` ,,,•1 .s.:ht. 4':'nr".�;IS'✓,%!: / DETAILS MANUFAC111RER'S RECONMENDATiON$ DISTURBED AREAS WITH - ..::,%;::( . s t:4,; - /` °� i"<"' SHEAR GATE WITH CONTROL ROD FOR MEADOW SEED MIX `1rt'"�- OVEREXCAVAIE POND TO .. - -. - - - _ -(�EMERGENCY HIGH FLOW RATE DRAINAGE \ Z )•,,...�,"A..;. FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF 5' .47.00. 4 2'MN. RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH 7.6"DIAMETER ORIFICE OF TOPSOIL(TYPICAL) !2•HOPE if FROM POND -I 12"OUTLET TO CATCH BASIN POND BOiT0A1 � ,:• �i �-, 445.33' 'J '� 445 33' a45.00'INLET ' sA5S70' 'F \`DO NOT COMPACT _-. A:. ti3.,.;`.Z,:"•': NATIVE SUBGRADE PIPE P 54"DIA TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN WITH OVERFLOW�. 1r --112"DIAMETER IRESIRICTOR/SEPERATOR, GRATE FOR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW --24.i i�SEE CONTROL MANHOLE NOTES DETENTION POND BERM CROSS SECTION d o 4� 213 a 3• NOT TO SCALE CONTROL MANHOLE NOTES f OVERFLOW/CONTROL MANHOLE NOT SCALE 1.EXCEPT AS SHORN OR NOTED.UNIT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE'NTH THE I APWA/DOT REQUIREMENTS FOR A TYPE 2 CATCH BASN,54'MNIMUM DIAMETER AND THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLAN 8029. 2.FOR DETAILS SHOWING GRADE RING,HANDHOLDS,AND TOP SAGS,SEE APWA/DOT STANDARD PLAN-MISCELLANEOUS CATCH BASIN DETAILS'. _ NIDTH PER SIE PLANS, 3.PPE SUPPORTS AND RESIRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AND DWGS NO.CO5.CO6,AND CO7 CRUSHED SURFACING(IT/i MINUS)IN CONFORMANCE WITH BE ANCHORED AT 3'MAXW.IUM VERTICAL SPACNG BY 5/8"DIAMETER STANLESS STEEL FINISHED GRADES PER SITE PLANS, VLSDOT 9-03.9(3).COMPACTED TO 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY EXPANSION BOLTS OR EMBEDDED 2"INTO WALL. DWGS NO.CO5,C06, AND C07 DENSITY PER ASTM 01557(MODIFIED PROCTOR),PROCEDURE B A.THE RESTPoCTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM.060'ALUMNUM OR.064' ` �"� OR C. ALUMNIZED STEEL,OR.064"GALVANIZED STEEL PPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36, �,5' 6" `,.a '-.,} ' �-�,, - \ M196,1197,AND M274.GALVANIZED STEEL SHALL HAVE TREATMENT T 1 1 — i o a O :-59:,,- S a S.OUTLET SHALL BE CONNECTED;,ROUTED TO CATCH BASH FOR WATERTIGHT SEAL. ;�i cPie �o o? �o o� n/16'Du SMOOTH BARS 'r. ,fin/. CI h� t-,:% J',^'[`�: � : \�, SELECT CLASS B GRAVEL BACKFILL IN CONFORMANCE VATH WSDOT 9-03.12(1)B, 6. THE VERTICAL RISER STEM OF THE RESTRICTOR/$EPARATOR 9iALL BE THE SAME EQUALLY SPACED(4"O.0 MAX.) /� / �I,` \/'%;�; COMPACTED TO 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM D1557 MODIFIED ',C'/ :'+'..:�/ :r;.� . ( DIAMETER AS THE HORIZONTAL OUTLET PIPE MTH AN 8•MINIMUM DIAMETER. i 4 ' 1`' \' ♦ PROCTOR),PROCEDURE B OR C. ) '(�II I _ 7.FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS ARE TO BE OFFSET SO THAT: A CLEANOUT GATE IS CLEAR ROADWAY OU TREES AND BRUSH. UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PROOF ROLLED TO A FIRM AND UNYIELDING VISIBLE FROM TOP B)GUMS DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND GATE. C)FRAME IS STRIP TOPSOL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12". CONDITION WITH A 10-TON VIBRATORY ROLLER OR OTHER METHOD APPROVED CLEAR OF CURB(IF ANY EXISTS) ;/I111 REMOVE SOL CONTAINING MORE THAN 5S ORGNCS COMPLETELY REMOVE LARGE BY THE ENgNEER. AREAS THAT ARE SOFT,LOOSE,OR YIELDING SHALL BE �� FIOOIL QAIP ANOIOtID C8 R'�R ROOTS OR STUMPS IN THE ROADWAY AREA. COMPACTED TO MEET THESE SPECIFICATIONS OR REMOVED AND REPLACED. IF 8.CLENIOUT/SHEAR GATE: ALUMINUM ALLOY PER AS1M B-26-ZG-32A OR CAST IRON TO CB RISER NATIVE SUBS INDE MATERIAL IS VERY BACLffLL IS REQURED IT SHALL BE SELECT CLASS B GRAVEL BACKFILL N ASTU A48 CLASS JOB AS REQUIRED.LIFT HANDLE EITHER SOLO OR TUBING WITH PLAN NQSTLRE SENSITIVE AND WILL BECOME GRAVELED AREAS DETAIL CONFORMANCE WITH WSOOT 9-03.12(1)B,COMPACTED TO 95%OF MAXIMUM ADJJSTABLE HOOK AS REOUNED. NEOPRENE RUBBER GASKET REIXNRED BETWEEN RISER 11/16"TMCK x 4'WIDE,LONG SMOOTH NOOK CLAMP UNUSA&.E F NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECTED. DRY DENSITY PER ASTN D1557(MODIFIED PROCTOR),PROCEDURE B OR C. MOUNTING FLANGE AND GATE FLANGE. MATING SURFACES OR UD AND BODY TO BE BARS VETOED TO UPPER AND LOVER UPPER STEEL BAND NOT TO SCALE MAXIMUM LIFT TFICKNESS 8' PROOF ROLLNG SHALL THEN BE PERFORMED MAClIN D FOR PROPER FIT FLA NGE MOUNTING BOLTS SHALL BE 3/8'DIAMETER BANDS.24 BAPS EVENLY SPACED it/16'.4'WOE OVER ALL ROADWAY AREAS. STAINLESS STEEL �li)''\ NOTE ALL METAL PARTS CORROSION 9.ALTERNATE CLEANOUT/SHEAR GATES TO THE DESIGN SHOWN ON STANDARD PLAN B033 J RESISTANT,STEEL PART GALVANIZED. ARE ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THEY MEET THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS ABOVE AND HAVE �' F,1 A 9X BOLT,10-3/8"BOLT CIRCLE FOR BOLTING TO THE FLANGE CONNECTION. LOWER STEEL BAND.11/16"THICK A 4' HOOK CLAMP 10.GATE SHALL NOT OPEN BEYOND THE CLEAR OPENING AS SHOWN ON"MAX OPENING OF WIDE FORMED TO FIT IN GROOVE OF /TOTAL GTE"ON STANDARD P!,AN B-3 SHEET 2,BY UNITED HINGE MOVEMENT.STOP TAB,OR CATCH BASIN RISER SOME OIFEH DEVICE. PROFILE 54"DIA CATCH BASH RISER 9 GALE WIRE r 14 GAUGE GALVANIZED BARBS 6 GAGE WIRE 2"LINE POST CUPS,0 24" IN A 4-PONT PATTERN,0 5' ROD MUST LIDEt E I d•-6' CUPS,0 14" 0 10'O.C.MAX 6 WIRES,'Y SHAPE. TOP HINGE INTO THIS ID EWEE,SEE SANG OVERFLOW GRATE mmommomommommmomm iw�w�. .w a:i� —� NOT TO SCALE T—U 2 r i;a w ? I sr/q Xi fi r ,i: x"f ;:i::%i . s;F.a<,••. .x <:.>:.'• 1 Rig c. yv :M:w c •{>+i, +•�`�•. ++tt,,�+,. 1 b•. t ++: J' a Nk 'R:::: •.'•.<t:+:<fi';, p,, t,'x+'t B .: ;2:}• ..t l— •• +.;: • v :?�;:r ,'+�+�, :flak{ ' ,,'n•:.;{.;., v;<.:H-;.c/r:,r:;< • 'i:fi•,X- ..:: <i-•::: ,• .' :: 4 211 : .;.: . I: :�: .:: >i :4:�> ,:4i" :.,.b x f ,-2 END POST :,:, ,. :° h f.: , �C :.�.... ram..; A�;:-.,. ��:y >y + :�' N/ / ,+.. ,., _ ' : «>'.r ;. ' I�iMe•+• ,+.,. i : 0>::', y !,:4.. ::4•4:.4'?NS ':P: +' ��:::: s�Y., }'p} xa,;•: ., +"•� 3 ti :::.:yw�. FENCING ROD : ,r>• : +}{• f `:!$! yFi 2,. ,f•••.';:,v', lJj,;•f ':~ i•.•�''':.: I�iS •, }::••:. 16 i+••^YI;V} xfiit YYY.wYY :1 .�+d '� �` cr i S JI .:,{�•y II �.2 �' ,. +^'NI..,•.: ':• I 8 0 T Y v 1ho-',X,r,',1.4,"',4:015%,'W4: :;:;:.1‘,45.55r �k; xv' P`Mrr :0.4§ r:, ••• ` i:*:; I .'?' 'i II AL.* ,Cy Wiiit,yR gig::: WM ENINNUanMa.WC. fi fi'' ' , /c• .y •::::: . 5/16' TIE R00 •}v :::: :•:::,:,• .,:t ? 1, ftE St*•k.. •U� r, �f . I masa.Wnztam ••f Lb:0.720 8052 ,.. : ' y .II spy ,, a�, • p :: 3, f ;/-+'. .• . ''•: :.,.' "•. 4 t n:h::::a,'~> +;:,1 •�'�. •.A ;ix:y'+. fY,',: ,••'.III�7:::" :+i•i£:+w`i0i p ,¢'' +!R.:*' ;:ililit:: '•. :.: r L`-� ..•�� ': :`y,aar.•:„:::;t.:.••'t$:r,;:_'�f:.--. •'',:,:.,•:a•:,C:;, ,+:'+'' £.,:a ;. 3:•:3,x .:{.:t'r caf;,:. I I FENCING WOE NBE .::}4: i' :•'! �fij. : . Y:.gEiij•:.t '•d•:-:, v'::,:>..+• .•;:dtti i S••:.':KK ii:•S••' MAXIMUM GAP =3" �l:frll:/Ois.1 R[DMOND OHrCf f•'W:f' f:• : S 5,,05>:r>:';:;;r•,: I' o IE::::'•.'.•: II 1 6 FOR ROD SUPPLIED BY . Z t •.+�:...,,// i•'.;b;Y�,.£u .:fi:•Y,L'S•:\,.�..>; F+/'i•:.;.:i:::,•';::1 a:': :::4'.aT.•r':.,•::: a,`i•.r:::. r /� .ct. :.af,R.',?• :9yDo•X. +...,r:•k -:: e'.Y. ta., ,xt+t-.+,c f� .5..:�� '•"."�..r�a� •.....•....•.._.....�. -:�' 1 4•_6• t L. \' . ':, 4 FENCING MANUFACTURER 25.5A41aee 1— E3illJ01.11 1 WENATO.=CRICK ``• t'3/16 NTERIMEDIAIE `•S .. . . . •, •, soss4.Vaso BRACE RAIL �,. •,/ `` DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE t (t • III .•„• -i2•� IF BAR IS NOT 2-LONG O E• Z. . ....... `BOTTOM HINGE - 10'MAx I 10'MAX I Teo'SWING CITY OF RENTON � POST HOLE CONCRETE: GUIDE TUBE DETAIL ROLLING HILLS RESER c .-� ', �;' STATIO • MN. I" H- 36" DEPTH MN - . PGST 1 GENERAL FENCE DETAILS 20'OR 30'SWING GATE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE �� "'" 3 �`°W'°�TP��'OSEb SITE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE ---.-'+a. NA uaesr MVO W.t 134.D62 RHBR-D381 Sal TIP J JAN 22.1998 I SHOWN N 11 OK 11 Tank Overflow and Control Structure 3 ,y1 w'-rEg.. i ANK ¢A‘vl t iJ —7 D A`4 S Q. _ >CsU � 2`t O, c GO OR "nJ ;-` 'A 4 /•i t O F J, 5 (S (..5-Le Nov, b_Qstr, (at a'+� t S X ebb ZO 140k1V. S.S. .7 'IS'Go •Cpo oR Ar ?RE-• Cue LOP&D ZS yR s7oRM euEti7- ,�cr��ur- ,art" . 07- /. / Qs!s t = . x 1c) _Y. c c y c 1, • 7.y ° • to .&0 .zy Cl ' r ZH /.11.: ' i i \ - `iS4.L ,tysia.5 Aa%e til C dk s{�' li 'unc' K o.o`117 1 t` 3 a 1 44T.o - tub, (64A:" -r g}S t-( ra CB ) v.)1.1.,V trvi p Lo M P o N Q -~T '. 33 ti ILA' . w 3.0 0iiffcc-• zy" 1 Zpi" d i 0, Tye I1 ct3 w! adcLeA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 4.4.7G FLOW RESTRICTOR/OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE(FROP-T) (TEE) Frame, Grate & Round Solid Cover Removable Watertight Marked "DRAIN" with Locking Bolts Cff-rne✓cteNcii Ot/e✓4(ow VJ.h. Coupling or Flawge. See Note 3 & KCRS Dwgs 49 & 501 } w Elev. per Plans / Vertical Bar Grate 2" Min. _�L —,J 1 - i'MW r for Pond Overflow ��PP MAx. tll • I—tli i 2 DgfLou/ — I • Max.DesgnW!I7 1.VIIN (6" min.) _ r �__ Max. `I Std. Galv. Handholds Plate Welded to Elbow t Pipe Supports t I( Ni.- Steps or Ladder With Orifice as Specified See Note b• ��t .J, See KCRS Dwg. 39 Elbow —Restrictor - Elbow Restrictor NO SCALE 1�5 Dia See Detail Min. 21 wi1H. Ir. Outlet Pipe �, Inlet (Wilk� Fri I Pipe(s)� See Notes 1 5 ~ , Shear Gate w/ Invert & Elev. {11•11 Per Plans •� i `� Control Rod For =C`+� Cleanout/Drain Restrictor Plats �---t— ,� (Rod Bent as Req.d W/ Orifice Dia. C - for Vertical Alignment as Specified 2 _ w/Cover) (Not Needed if for N 1 See KCRS Dwg. 53 for Oil Pollution r } Control Only) 1 -$F-41"10ist p PIPE LtiTiArT•-4I=D BY(IMK � Isometric 1311,14DTD A, �, NtoV LSection A—A � NOTU NO SCALE NO SCALE 1. USE MIN.54" DIA'CATCH 1 BASIN TYPE 2 Z MIN. Gf->:ARI•sN'- To NW 2. OUTLET CAPACITY: DEVELOPED 1?02"T'IOICJ OF FROP t IN(LL..UDtr.ILa +-,_60W� DESIGN FLOW Ladder Rungs 3. METAL PARTS: CORROSION RESISTANT. GALVANIZED PIPE ^\ Additional sets)to allow access PARTS TO HAVE ASPHALT , �� to Tanks or Vaults when TREATMENT 1. ► (I� Catch is filled with•water. 4. FRAME A LADDER OR STEPS A or A OFFSET SO: A. CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP. T �, B. CLIMB-DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR - II 1 OF RISER AND CLEANOUT 1 �'— II ' GRAM. ` �rII. C. FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB. �y-I Ll F 5. IF METAL OUTLET PIPE CONNECTS Elbow Restrictor 1 \ 4-j• / TO CEMENT CONCRETE PIPE: See Detai l `/ OUTLET PIPE TO HAVE SMOOTH /‘, O.D.EQUAL TO CONCRETE PIPE I.D.LESS 1/4". 6. PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE 0"X.090 Angle as necessary GAGE SUPPORT BRACKET See Note ANCHORED CONCRETE WALL (MAX.0'-0-VERTICAL SPACING). 7. LOCATE ELBOW RESTRICTOR(S)AS Plan View NECESSARY TO PROVIDE MIN. NO SCALE CLEARANCE AS SHOWN. s. LOCATE ADDITIONAL LADDER RUNGS IN STRUCTURES USED AS ACCESS TO TANKS OR VAULTS TO ALLOW ACCESS WHEN CATCH IS FILLED WITH WATER • ,.n 4.4.7-7 11/92 12/ 6/96 RH2 Engineering page 1 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. D-RH Description: Outlet Elev: 445 . 00 Elev: 443 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 3 . 0000 in. Elev: 447 . 00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 7 . 3000 in. Elev: 456 . 50 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 12 . 0000 in. STAGE < --DISCHARGE--- > STAGE < --DISCHARGE---> STAGE < --DISC (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs- 445 . 00 0 . 0000 448 . 10 1 . 9467 451 . 20 3 . 571 445 . 10 0 . 0772 448 . 20 2 . 0211 451 . 30 3 . 611 445 . 20 0 . 1092 448 . 30 2 . 0925 451 . 40 3 . 651 445 . 30 0 . 1338 448 . 40 2 . 1614 451 . 50 3 . 69C 445 . 40 0 . 1545 448 . 50 2 . 2281 451 . 60 3 . 729 445 . 50 0 . 1727 448 . 60 2 . 2926 451 . 70 3 . 767 445 . 60 0 . 1892 448 . 70 2 . 3553 451 . 80 3 . 805 445 . 70 0 . 2043 448 . 80 2 . 4163 451 . 90 3 . 842 445 . 80 0 . 2184 448 . 90 2 . 4757 452 . 00 3 . 879 445 . 90 0 . 2317 449 . 00 2 . 5336 452 . 10 3 . 91E 446 . 00 0 . 2442 449 . 10 2 . 5902 452 . 20 3 . 953 446 . 10 0 . 2562 449 . 20 2 . 6455 452 . 30 3 . 989 446 . 20 0 . 2675 449 . 30 2 . 6996 452 . 40 4 . 024 446 . 30 0 . 2785 449 . 40 2. 7526 452 . 50 4 . 06C 446 . 40 0 . 2890 449 . 50 2 . 8046 452 . 60 4 . 095 446 . 50 0 . 2991 449 . 60 2 . 8556 452 . 70 4 . 13C 446 . 60 0 . 3089 449 . 70 2 . 9057 452 . 80 4 . 164 446 . 70 0 . 3184 449 . 80 2 . 9549 452 . 90 4 . 199 446 . 80 0 . 3277 449 . 90 3 . 0033 453 . 00 4 . 233 446 . 90 0 . 3367 450 . 00 3 . 0509 453 . 10 4 . 26E 447 . 00 0 . 3455 450 . 10 3 . 0977 453 . 20 4 . 30C 447 . 10 0 . 8112 450 . 20 3 . 1439 453 . 30 4 . 333 447 . 20 1. 0090 450 . 30 3 . 1893 453 . 40 4 . 36E 447 . 30 1. 1625 450 . 40 3 . 2341 453 . 50 4 . 39S 447 . 40 1 . 2930 450 . 50 3 . 2782 453 . 60 4 . 431 447 . 50 1 . 4087 450 . 60 3 . 3218 453 . 70 4 . 463 447 . 60 1 . 5140 450 . 70 3 . 3648 453 . 80 4 . 495 447 . 70 1 . 6112 450 . 80 3 .4072 453 . 90 4 . 527 447 . 80 1 . 7021 450 . 90 3 . 4491 454 . 00 4 . 55E 447 . 90 1 . 7878 451 . 00 3 . 4905 454 . 10 4 . 59C 448 . 00 1 . 8692 451 . 10 3 . 5314 454 . 20 4 . 621 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 2 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: Pond NAME: Basin for sizing orifice SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 50 . 00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 67 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 75 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 . 20 AREA. . : 50 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 9 . 89 cfs VOL: 6 . 06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DES= RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUN( (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (c 10 0 . 6700 350 2 . 7395 690 2 . 5528 1030 1 . 8' 20 0 . 6700 360 2 . 7901 700 2 . 5691 1040 2 . 1 30 0 . 6700 370 2 . 7484 710 2 . 5570 1050 2 . 1 40 0 . 6700 380 2 . 7001 720 2 . 5590 1060 2 . 1. 50 0 . 6700 390 2 . 7228 730 2 . 5752 1070 2 . 1. 60 0 . 6700 400 2 . 7545 740 2 . 5629 1080 2 . 1. 70 0 . 6700 410 2 . 7955 750 2 . 5647 1090 2 . 0 80 0 . 6700 420 2 . 8115 760 2 . 5808 1100 1 . 8' 90 0 . 6700 430 4 . 1393 770 2 . 5683 1110 1 . 8 100 0 . 6700 440 5 . 5179 780 2 . 5701 1120 2 . 3. 110 0 . 6827 450 5 . 6165 790 2. 3428 1130 1 . 8' 120 0 . 7298 460 7 . 6303 800 2 . 1008 1140 1 . 4 130 0 . 8123 470 9 . 7001 810 2 . 1018 1150 1 . 8' 140 0 . 9034 480 9 . 8868 820 2 . 1027 1160 1 . 8 150 0 . 9817 490 7 . 3360 830 2 . 1035 1170 1 . 8' 160 1 . 0514 500 4 . 7128 840 2 . 1044 1180 1 . 8` 170 1 . 1224 510 4 . 7360 850 2 . 2202 1190 1 . 8 180 1 . 1847 520 4 . 5248 860 2 . 3504 1200 1 . 8 190 1. 2383 530 4 . 3240 870 2 . 3516 1210 1 . 8 200 1 . 2976 540 4 . 3390 880 2 . 3383 1220 1 . 8 210 1 . 3481 550 3 . 7720 890 2 . 3538 1230 1 . 8 220 1 . 3894 560 3 . 2008 900 2 . 3548 1240 1 . 8 230 1 . 4401 570 3 . 2070 910 2 . 3415 1250 1 . 8, 240 1 . 4815 580 3 . 2267 920 2 . 3569 1260 1 . 8 250 1 . 5819 590 3 . 2185 930 2 . 3579 1270 1 . 8` 260 1 . 6843 600 3 . 2239 940 2 . 3445 1280 1 . 8 270 1 . 7289 610 3 . 1171 950 2 . 3599 1290 1 . 8 280 1 . 7785 620 3 . 0096 960 2 . 3609 1300 1 . 8 290 1 . 8089 630 3 . 0137 970 1 . 9857 1310 1 . 8 300 1 . 8455 640 3 . 0036 980 1 . 6391 1320 1 . 8 310 2 . 1987 650 3 . 0214 990 1 . 6394 1330 1 . 7 320 2 . 5596 660 3 . 0251 1000 1 . 6252 1340 1 . 6 330 2 . 6249 670 2 . 7883 1010 1 . 6400 1350 1 . 6 340 2 . 6846 680 2 . 5507 1020 1 . 6403 1360 1 . 6 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 4 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf-AcFt Acres 1 9 . 887 480 264149 cf 50 . 00 3 0 . 746 1470 114893 cf 50 . 00 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 5 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 1 Peak runoff: 9 . 8868 cfs Total Vol: 6 . 06 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DES] RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNC (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cf 10 0 . 6700 410 2 . 7955 810 2 . 1018 1210 1 . 89 20 0 . 6700 420 2 . 8115 820 2 . 1027 1220 1 . 8E 30 0 . 6700 430 4 . 1393 830 2 . 1035 1230 1 . 8E 40 0 . 6700 440 5 . 5179 840 2 . 1044 1240 1 . 8S 50 0 . 6700 450 5 . 6165 850 2 . 2202 1250 1 . 8E 60 0 . 6700 460 7 . 6303 860 2 . 3504 1260 1 . 8E 70 0 . 6700 470 9 . 7001 870 2 . 3516 1270 1 . 8S 80 0 . 6700 480 9 . 8868 880 2 . 3383 1280 1 . 8E 90 0 . 6700 490 7 . 3360 890 2 . 3538 1290 1 . 8E 100 0 . 6700 500 4 . 7128 900 2 . 3548 1300 1 . 8S 110 0 . 6827 510 4 . 7360 910 2 . 3415 1310 1 . 8E 120 0 . 7298 520 4 . 5248 920 2 . 3569 1320 1 . 8E 130 0 . 8123 530 4 . 3240 930 2 . 3579 1330 1 . 7E 140 0 . 9034 540 4 . 3390 940 2 . 3445 1340 1 . 6` 150 0 . 9817 550 3 . 7720 950 2 . 3599 1350 1 . 6` 160 1 . 0514 560 3 . 2008 960 2 . 3609 1360 1 . 6_ 170 1 . 1224 570 3 . 2070 970 1 . 9857 1370 1 . 6E 180 1 . 1847 580 3 . 2267 980 1 . 6391 1380 1 . 6` 190 1 . 2383 590 3 . 2185 990 1 . 6394 1390 1 . 6: 200 1 . 2976 600 3 . 2239 1000 1 . 6252 1400 1 . 6`_ 210 1 . 3481 610 3 . 1171 1010 1 . 6400 1410 1 . 6_ 220 1 . 3894 620 3 . 0096 1020 1 . 6403 1420 1 . 6: 230 1 . 4401 630 3 . 0137 1030 1 . 8725 1430 1 . 6` 240 1 . 4815 640 3 . 0036 1040 2. 1193 1440 1 . 6_ 250 1 . 5819 650 3 . 0214 1050 2 . 1199 1450 1 . 1S 260 1 . 6843 660 3 . 0251 1060 2 . 1205 1460 0 . 6- 270 1 . 7289 670 2. 7883 1070 2 . 1211 1470 0 . 6' 280 1 . 7785 680 2 . 5507 1080 2 . 1217 1480 0 . 6', 290 1 . 8089 690 2 . 5528 1090 2 . 0061 1490 0 . 6, 300 1 . 8455 700 2 . 5691 1100 1 . 8758 1500 0 . 6T 310 2 . 1987 710 2 . 5570 1110 1 . 8762 1510 0 . 6' 320 2 . 5596 720 2 . 5590 1120 2 . 3275 1520 0 . 6/ 330 2 . 6249 730 2 . 5752 1130 1 . 8770 1530 0 . 6, 340 2 . 6846 740 2 . 5629 1140 1 . 4411 1540 0 . 6T 350 2 . 7395 750 2 . 5647 1150 1 . 8923 1550 0 . 6' 360 2 . 7901 760 2 . 5808 1160 1 . 8782 1560 0 . 6'. 370 2 . 7484 770 2 . 5683 1170 1 . 8785 1570 0 . 6' 380 2 . 7001 780 2 . 5701 1180 1 . 8935 1580 0 . 6", 390 2 . 7228 790 2 . 3428 1190 1 . 8793 1590 0 . 6'. 400 2 . 7545 800 2 . 1008 1200 1 . 8796 1600 0 . 6' 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 6 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 1 Peak runoff : 9 . 8868 cfs Total Vol : 6 . 06 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESI RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNC (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cf 2010 0 . 6700 2210 0 . 6700 2410 0 . 6700 2610 0 . 67 2020 0 . 6700 2220 0 . 6700 2420 0 . 6700 2620 0 . 67 2030 0 . 6700 2230 0 . 6700 2430 0 . 6700 2630 0 . 67 2040 0 . 6700 2240 0 . 6700 2440 0 . 6700 2640 0 . 67 2050 0 . 6700 2250 0 . 6700 2450 0 . 6700 2650 0 . 67 2060 0 . 6700 2260 0.. 6700 2460 0 . 6700 2660 0 . 67 2070 0 . 6700 2270 0 . 6700 2470 0 . 6700 2670 0 . 67 2080 0 . 6700 2280 0 . 6700 2480 0 . 6700 2680 0 . 67 2090 0 . 6700 2290 0 . 6700 2490 0 . 6700 2690 0 . 67 2100 0 . 6700 2300 0 . 6700 2500 0 . 6700 2700 0 . 67 2110 0 . 6700 2310 0 . 6700 2510 0 . 6700 2710 0 . 67 2120 0 . 6700 2320 0 . 6700 2520 0 . 6700 2720 0 . 67 2130 0 . 6700 2330 0 . 6700 2530 0 . 6700 2730 0 . 67 2140 0 . 6700 2340 0 . 6700 2540 0 . 6700 2740 0 . 67 2150 0 . 6700 2350 0 . 6700 2550 0 . 6700 2750 0 . 67 2160 0 . 6700 2360 0 . 6700 2560 0 . 6700 2760 0 . 6; 2170 0 . 6700 2370 0 . 6700 2570 0 . 6700 2770 0 . 6; 2180 0 . 6700 2380 0 . 6700 2580 0 . 6700 2780 0 . 67 2190 0 . 6700 2390 0 . 6700 2590 0 . 6700 2790 0 . 65 2200 0 . 6700 2400 0 . 6700 2600 0 . 6700 2800 0 . 67 2210 0 . 6700 2410 0 . 6700 2610 0 . 6700 2810 0 . 67 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 7 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 3 Peak runoff : 0 . 7458 cfs Total Vol: 2 . 64 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESI RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNO (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cf 10 410 0 . 3892 810 0 . 6540 1210 0 . 71 20 420 0 . 3973 820 0 . 6559 1220 0 . 72 30 0 . 0302 430 0 . 4053 830 0 . 6578 1230 0 . 72 40 0 . 0590 440 0 . 4151 840 0 . 6597 1240 0 . 72 50 0 . 0811 450 0 .4285 850 0 . 6616 1250 0 . 72 60 0 . 0921 460 0 . 4434 860 0 . 6636 1260 0 . 72 70 0 . 1029 470 0 . 4602 870 0 . 6657 1270 0 . 72 80 0 . 1124 480 0 . 4810 880 0 . 6678 1280 0 . 72 90 0 . 1204 490 0 . 5029 890 0 . 6700 1290 0 . 72 100 0 . 1282 500 0 . 5206 900 0 . 6721 1300 0 . 73 110 0 . 1355 510 0 . 5321 910 0 . 6742 1310 0 . 73 120 0 . 1419 520 0 . 5405 920 0 . 6763 1320 0 . 73 130 0 . 1486 530 0 . 5484 930 0 . 6783 1330 0 . 73 140 0 . 1558 540 0 . 5558 940 0 . 6804 1340 0 . 73 150 0 . 1630 550 0 . 5628 950 0 . 6824 1350 0 . 73 160 0 . 1711 560 0 . 5691 960 0 . 6845 1360 0 . 73 170 0 . 1790 570 0 . 5743 970 0 . 6865 1370 0 . 73 180 0 . 1874 580 0 . 5788 980 0 . 6882 1380 0 . 73 190 0 . 1957 590 0 . 5834 990 0 . 6896 1390 0 . 73 200 0 . 2042 600 0 . 5878 1000 0 . 6907 1400 0 . 74 210 0 . 2124 610 0 . 5922 1010 0 . 6918 1410 0 . 74 220 0 . 2208 620 0 . 5964 1020 0 . 6929 1420 0 . 74 230 0 . 2290 630 0 . 6004 1030 0 . 6940 1430 0 . 74 240 0 . 2372 640 0 . 6042 1040 0 . 6953 1440 0 . 74 250 0 . 2453 650 0 . 6080 1050 0 . 6968 1450 0 . 74 260 0 . 2534 660 0 . 6118 1060 0 . 6984 1460 0 . 74 270 0 . 2618 670 0 . 6155 1070 0 . 7001 1470 0 . 74 280 0 . 2703 680 0 . 6189 1080 0 . 7017 1480 0 . 74 290 0 . 2787 690 0 . 6220 1090 0 . 7033 1490 0 . 74 300 0 . 2868 700 0 . 6249 1100 0 . 7048 1500 0 . 74 310 0 . 2948 710 0 . 6277 1110 0 . 7062 1510 0 . 74 320 0 . 3035 720 0 . 6305 1120 0 . 7075 1520 0 . 74 330 0 . 3135 730 0 . 6333 1130 0 . 7091 1530 0 . 74 340 0 . 3240 740 0 . 6361 1140 0 . 7106 1540 0 . 74 350 0 . 3343 750 0 . 6388 1150 0 . 7117 1550 0 . 74 360 0 . 3444 760 0 . 6415 1160 0 . 7127 1560 0 . 74 370 0 . 3542 770 0 . 6442 1170 0 . 7140 1570 0 . 74 380 0 . 3636 780 0 . 6468 1180 0 . 7153 1580 0 . 74 390 0 . 3725 790 0 . 6494 1190 0 . 7166 1590 0 . 74 400 0 . 3810 800 0 . 6519 1200 0 . 7178 1600 0 . 74 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 8 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 3 Peak runoff: 0 . 7458 cfs Total Vol: 2 . 64 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DES RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUN (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (c 2010 0 . 7418 2210 0 . 7404 2410 0 . 7390 2610 0 . 7 2020 0 . 7417 2220 0 . 7403 2420 0 . 7389 2620 0 . 7 2030 0 . 7417 2230 0 . 7402 2430 0 . 7388 2630 0 . 7 2040 0 . 7416 2240 0 . 7402 2440 0 . 7388 2640 0 . 7 2050 0 . 7415 2250 0 . 7401 2450 0 . 7387 2650 0 . 7 2060 0 . 7414 2260 0 . 7400 2460 0 . 7386 2660 0 . 7 2070 0 . 7414 2270 0 . 7400 2470 0 . 7386 2670 0 . 7 2080 0 . 7413 2280 0 . 7399 2480 0 . 7385 2680 0 . 7 2090 0 . 7412 2290 0 . 7398 2490 0 . 7384 2690 0 . 7 2100 0 . 7412 2300 0 . 7397 2500 0 . 7383 2700 0 . 7 2110 0 . 7411 2310 0 . 7397 2510 0 . 7383 2710 0 . 7 2120 0 . 7410 2320 0 . 7396 2520 0 . 7382 2720 0 . 7 2130 0 . 7409 2330 0 . 7395 2530 0 . 7381 2730 0 . 7 2140 0 . 7409 2340 0 . 7395 2540 0 . 7381 2740 0 . 7 2150 0 . 7408 2350 0 . 7394 2550 0 . 7380 2750 0 . 7 2160 0 . 7407 2360 0 . 7393 2560 0 . 7379 2760 0 . 7 2170 0 . 7407 2370 0 . 7392 2570 0 . 7379 2770 0 . 7 2180 0 . 7406 2380 0 . 7392 2580 0 . 7378 2780 0 . 7 2190 0 . 7405 2390 0 . 7391 2590 0 . 7377 2790 0 . 7 2200 0 . 7404 2400 0 . 7390 2600 0 . 7377 2800 0 . 7 2210 0 . 7404 2410 0 . 7390 2610 0 . 7376 2810 0 . 7 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 9 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. S-RH Description: Length: 100 . 00 ft. Width: 100 . 00 ft. Side Slope 1 : 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate: 0 . 00 min/inch 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 10 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. S-RH Description: Length: 100 . 00 ft. Width: 100 . 00 ft. Side Slope 1 : 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate: 0 . 00 min/inch STAGE < ----STORAGE---- > STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE < ----ST( (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- 445 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 448 . 60 44336 1 . 0178 452 . 20 1075f 445 . 10 1006 0 . 0231 448 . 70 45822 1 . 0519 452 . 30 1096, 445 . 20 2024 0 . 0465 448 . 80 47322 1 . 0864 452 . 40 1117. 445 . 30 3054 0 . 0701 448 . 90 48838 1 . 1212 452 . 50 1138 445 . 40 4097 0 . 0940 449 . 00 50368 1 . 1563 452. 60 1159: 445 . 50 5152 0 . 1183 449 . 10 51913 1 . 1918 452 . 70 1180' 445 . 60 6219 0 . 1428 449 . 20 53473 1 . 2276 452 . 80 1201' 445 . 70 7298 0 . 1675 449 . 30 55048 1 . 2637 452 . 90 1223( - 445 . 80 8390 0 . 1926 449 . 40 56638 1 . 3002 453 . 00 1245, 445 . 90 9495 0 . 2180 449 . 50 58244 1 . 3371 453 . 10 1267, 446 . 00 10612 0 . 2436 449 . 60 59864 1 . 3743 453 . 20 1289 446 . 10 11742 0 . 2696 449 . 70 61500 1 . 4118 453 . 30 1311' 446 . 20 12885 0 . 2958 449 . 80 63151 1 . 4497 453 . 40 1334, 446 . 30 14040 0 . 3223 449 . 90 64818 1 . 4880 453 . 50 1357. 446 . 40 15209 0 . 3491 450 . 00 66500 1 . 5266 453 . 60 1380 446 . 50 16391 0 . 3763 450 . 10 68198 1 . 5656 453 . 70 1403 446 . 60 17585 0 . 4037 450 . 20 69911 1 . 6049 453 . 80 1426- 446 . 70 18793 0 . 4314 450 . 30 71641 1 . 6446 453 . 90 1449, 446 . 80 20014 0 . 4595 450 . 40 73386 1 . 6847 454 . 00 1473• 446 . 90 21248 0 . 4878 450 . 50 75147 1 . 7251 454 . 10 1497 447 . 00 22496 0 . 5164 450 . 60 76923 1 . 7659 454 . 20 1521 447 . 10 23757 0 . 5454 450 . 70 78716 1 . 8071 454 . 30 1545, 447 . 20 25032 0 . 5747 450 . 80 80525 1 . 8486 454 . 40 1569, 447 . 30 26320 0 . 6042 450 . 90 82351 1 . 8905 454 . 50 1594_ 447 . 40 27622 0 . 6341 451 . 00 84192 1 . 9328 454 . 60 1619 447 . 50 28938 0 . 6643 451 . 10 86050 1 . 9754 454 . 70 1644t 447 . 60 30267 0 . 6948 451 . 20 87924 2 . 0185 454 . 80 1669 447 . 70 31610 0 . 7257 451 . 30 89815 2 . 0619 454 . 90 1694' 447 . 80 32967 0 . 7568 451 . 40 91722 2 . 1056 455 . 00 1720 447 . 90 34339 0 . 7883 451 . 50 93646 2 . 1498 455 . 10 1745 448 . 00 35724 0 . 8201 451 . 60 95586 2 . 1944 455 . 20 1771 448 . 10 37123 0 . 8522 451 . 70 97543 2 . 2393 455 . 30 1797 448 . 20 38537 0 . 8847 451 . 80 99517 2 . 2846 455 . 40 1823' 448 . 30 39965 0 . 9175 451 . 90 101508 2 . 3303 455 . 50 1850 448 . 40 41408 0 . 9506 452 . 00 103516 2 . 3764 455 . 60 1877 448 . 50 42865 0 . 9840 452 . 10 105541 2 . 4229 455 . 70 1903. 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 13 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. D-RH Description: Outlet Elev: 445 . 00 Elev: 443 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 3 . 0000 in. Elev: 457 . 00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 12 . 0000 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE--- > STAGE < --DISC (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs- 445 . 00 0 . 0000 448 . 10 0 . 4300 451 . 20 0 . 608 445 . 10 0 . 0772 448 . 20 0 . 4369 451 . 30 0 . 613 445 . 20 0 . 1092 448 . 30 0 . 4437 451 . 40 0 . 617 445 . 30 0 . 1338 448 . 40 0 . 4503 451 . 50 0 . 622 445 . 40 0 . 1545 448 . 50 0 . 4569 451 . 60 0 . 627 445 . 50 0 . 1727 448 . 60 0 . 4634 451 . 70 0 . 632 445 . 60 0 . 1892 448 . 70 0 . 4698 451 . 80 0 . 636 445 . 70 0 . 2043 448 . 80 0 . 4761 451 . 90 0 . 641 445 . 80 0 . 2184 448 . 90 0 . 4823 452 . 00 0 . 646 445 . 90 0 . 2317 449 . 00 0 . 4885 452 . 10 0 . 650 446 . 00 0 . 2442 449 . 10 0 . 4945 452 . 20 0 . 655 446 . 10 0 . 2562 449 . 20 0 . 5005 452 . 30 0 . 659 446 . 20 0 . 2675 449 . 30 0 . 5065 452 . 40 0 . 664 446 . 30 0 . 2785 449 . 40 0 . 5123 452 . 50 0 . 668 446 . 40 0 . 2890 449 . 50 0 . 5181 452 . 60 0 . 673 446 . 50 0 . 2991 449 . 60 0 . 5238 452 . 70 0 . 677 446 . 60 0 . 3089 449 . 70 0 . 5295 452 . 80 0 . 682 446 . 70 0 . 3184 449 . 80 0 . 5351 452 . 90 0 . 686 446 . 80 0 . 3277 449 . 90 0 . 5406 453 . 00 0 . 690 446 . 90 0 . 3367 450 . 00 0 . 5461 453 . 10 0 . 695 447 . 00 0 . 3454 450 . 10 0 . 5516 453 . 20 0 . 699 447 . 10 0 . 3539 450 . 20 0 . 5569 453 . 30 0 . 703 447 . 20 0 . 3623 450 . 30 0 . 5623 453 . 40 0 . 707 447 . 30 0 . 3704 450 . 40 0 . 5675 ' 453 . 50 0 . 712 447 . 40 0 . 3784 450 . 50 0 . 5728 453 . 60 0 . 716 447 . 50 0 . 3862 450 . 60 0 . 5780 453 . 70 0 . 720 447 . 60 0 . 3938 450 . 70 0 . 5831 453 . 80 0 . 724 447 . 70 0 .4013 450 . 80 0 . 5882 453 . 90 0 . 728 447 . 80 0 . 4087 450 . 90 0 . 5932 454 . 00 0 . 732 447 . 90 0 . 4159 451 . 00 0 . 5982 454 . 10 0 . 73E 448 . 00 0 . 4230 451 . 10 0 . 6032 454 . 20 0 . 740 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 14 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (Cf) POND DRAINAGE 0 . 00 9 . 89 S-RH D-RH 454 . 32 3 1 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 15 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing REACH SUMMARY Network Reach R-POND REACH < -AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q % PIPE Ndep ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft (cfs) (ft R-RH 50 . 00 2 . 00 10 . 00 0 . 0100 0 . 0130 9 . 89 43 . 59 0 . PIPE REACH ID No. R-RH From: To: Pipe Diameter: 2 . 00 ft n: 0 . 0130 Pipe Length 10 . 00 ft s : 0 . 0100 Up invert 446 . 00 ft down invert: 445 . 90 ft Collection Area: 50 . 00 Ac . Design Flow 9 . 89 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0 . 92 ft Pipe Capacity 22 . 68 cfs Design Vel 6 . 97 fps Travel Time: 0 . 02 min Pipe Full Vel 7 . 22 fps 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 1 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No . D-RH Description: Outlet Elev: 445 . 00 Elev: 443 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 2 . 7500 in. Elev: 457 . 00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 12 . 0000 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE--- > STAGE < --DISCHARGE--- > STAGE <--DIS (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 445 . 00 0 . 0000 448 . 10 0 . 3613 451 . 20 0 . 51 445 . 10 0 . 0649 448 . 20 0 . 3671 451 . 30 0 . 51 445 . 20 0 . 0918 448 . 30 0 . 3728 451 . 40 0 . 51 445 . 30 0 . 1124 448 . 40 0 . 3784 451 . 50 0 . 52 445 . 40 0 . 1298 448 . 50 0 . 3839 451 . 60 0 . 52 445 . 50 0 . 1451 448 . 60 0 . 3894 451 . 70 0 . 53 445 . 60 0 . 1590 448 . 70 0 . 3948 451 . 80 0 . 53 445 . 70 0 . 1717 448 . 80 0 . 4001 451 . 90 0 . 53 445 . 80 0 . 1836 448 . 90 0 . 4053 452 . 00 0 . 54 445 . 90 0 . 1947 449 . 00 0 . 4104 452 . 10 0 . 54 446 . 00 0 . 2052 449 . 10 0 . 4155 452 . 20 0 . 5E 446 . 10 0 . 2152 449 . 20 0 . 4206 452 . 30 0 . 5E 446 . 20 0 . 2248 449 . 30 0 . 4256 452 . 40 0 . 5E 446 . 30 0 . 2340 449 . 40 0 . 4305 452 . 50 0 . 5E 446 . 40 0 . 2428 449 . 50 0 . 4353 452. 60 0 . 5E 446 . 50 0 . 2513 449 . 60 0 . 4402 452 . 70 0 . 5E 446 . 60 0 . 2596 449 . 70 0 . 4449 452 . 80 0 . 57 446 . 70 0 . 2676 449 . 80 0 . 4496 452 . 90 0 . 57 446 . 80 0 . 2753 449 . 90 0 . 4543 453 . 00 0 . 5E 446 . 90 0 . 2829 450 . 00 0 . 4589 453 . 10 0 . 5E 447 . 00 0 . 2902 450 . 10 0 . 4635 453 . 20 0 . 5E 447 . 10 0 . 2974 450 . 20 0 . 4680 453 . 30 0 . 5S 447 . 20 0 . 3044 450 . 30 0 . 4725 453 . 40 0 . 5.0 447 . 30 0 . 3112 450 . 40 0 . 4769 453 . 50 0 . 5S. 447 . 40 0 . 3179 450 . 50 0 . 4813 453 . 60 0 . 6C 447 . 50 0 . 3245 450 . 60 0 . 4856 453 . 70 0 . 6C 447 . 60 0 . 3309 450 . 70 0 . 4900 453 . 80 0 . 6( 447 . 70 0 . 3372 450 . 80 0 . 4942 453 . 90 0 . 6: 447 . 80 0 . 3434 450 . 90 0 . 4985 454 . 00 0 . 6: 447 . 90 0 . 3495 451 . 00 0 . 5027 454 . 10 0 . 6" 448 . 00 0 . 3555 451 . 10 0 . 5069 454 . 20 0 . 6: 12/ 5/96 RH2 Engineering page 1 Rolling Hills Reservoir Overflow Pond Drainage Orifice Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. D-RH Description: Outlet Elev: 445 . 00 5,y3 c-CS Elev: 443 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 7 . 6000 in. Elev: 457 . 00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 12 . 0000 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DIS (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 445 . 00 0 . 0000 448 . 10 2 . 7598 451 . 20 3 . 90 445 . 10 0 .4957 448 . 20 2 . 8039 451. 30 3 . 93 445 . 20 0 . 7010 448 . 30 2 . 8474 451 . 40 3 . 96 445 . 30 0 . 8585 448 . 40 2 . 8902 451. 50 3 . 99 445 . 40 0 . 9913 448 . 50 2 . 9324 451. 60 4 . 02 445 . 50 1 . 1083 448 . 60 2 . 9740 451 . 70 4. 05 445 . 60 1 . 2141 448 . 70 3 . 0150 451 . 80 4. 08 445 . 70 1 . 3114 448 . 80 3 . 0555 451. 90 4. 11 445 . 80 1 .4020 448 . 90 3 . 0954 452 . 00 4. 14 . 445 . 90 1 . 4870 449 . 00 3 . 1349 452. 10 4. 17 446 . 00 1 . 5674 449 . 10 3 . 1738 452 . 20 4 . 2C 446 . 10 1 . 6439 449 . 20 3 . 2123 452. 30 4. 2_ 446 . 20 1 . 7170 449 . 30 3 . 2503 452 . 40 4. 2E 446 . 30 1 . 7871 449 .40 3 . 2879 452 . 50 4. 2S 446 . 40 1 . 8546 449 . 50 3 . 3250 452. 60 4. 3: 446 . 50 1 . 9197 449 . 60 3 . 3618 452 . 70 4. 34 446 . 60 1 . 9827 449 . 70 3 . 3981 452 . 80 4 . 3-, 446 . 70 2 . 0437 449 . 80 3 . 4341 452 . 90 4. 4C 446 . 80 2 . 1029 449 . 90 3 . 4697 453 . 00 4 .4_ 446 . 90 2 . 1606 450 . 00 3 . 5049 453 . 10 4.4E 447 . 00 2 . 2167 450 . 10 3 . 5398 453 . 20 4. 4£ 447 . 10 2 . 2714 450 . 20 3 . 5743 453 . 30 4. 52 447 . 20 2 . 3249 450 . 30 3 . 6085 453 . 40 4 . 5i 447 . 30 2. 3771 450 . 40 3 . 6424 453 . 50 4. 5E 447 . 40 2 . 4283 450 . 50 3 . 6760 453 . 60 4 . 5c 447 . 50 2 . 4783 450 . 60 3 . 7092 453 . 70 4. 6: 447 . 60 2 . 5274 450 . 70 3 . 7422 453 . 80 4. 61 447 . 70 2 . 5756 450 . 80 3 . 7749 453 . 90 4. 6' 447 . 80 2 . 6228 450 . 90 3 . 8073 454 . 00 4. 7( 447 . 90 2 . 6692 451 . 00 3 . 8394 454 . 10 4. 7: 448 . 00 2 . 7149 451 . 10 3 . 8713 454 . 20 4 . 7` Geotechnical Report • J'.�"`t:•�1- s4 yy•� .s^'l.i+l-�� -i+. ,�{S;:"•: t` h1� !•:.'�: .:�:.r`.Z•f t;: .d,':: re s 1 •1• , ,,'..' r t • J 1 • r .. .- .• -,::•.-: _-,-_-_ , , . • . •• •.• • _. .._ s .. . . . . , . • • . . " s • : _, ... . . . . _ .. • _ ., . - • • . .. . , , . , . • . . . ... _ . . _ ,. , . • _ ... „ • .• • . _ . _ _ . . , : , ... , 1 ,- ..... — •• , _ . - . . . . • . . . . • • • i ' , • ' _ • .. _ ' 1. . Report`, J: 1' _ - • •_ ' " - ._ Phase III Geotechnical Engineering_Services• Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster • : Pup p Station. • Renton, Washington • k \. March 22, 1996 • it y5-\ ••�` / • ,'• • r: for - • _ i�- ., of Renton City '.. .. • /.. ••.; •' .ram 4 .._ } • • • '. -�.. \ !-~ _� ( •w -• -'�: ` - ,- l• • i.C! -\ . -�' • i t 4 •• . • • • Zi r • • • 1. • i File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • • , GeoEngine. ers _ Geo Engineers March 22, 1996 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists RH2 Engineering Offices in Washington, Opportunity Building Oregon.and Alaska 8383 - 158th Avenue Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 Attention: Mr. Dan Ervin We are pleased to submit three copies of our "Report, Phase III Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington." The scope of our services for this study is described in our confirming agreement dated October 23, 1995. Authorization to proceed with the services was provided by Mr. Geoff Clayton during a team meeting at your office on October 5, 1995. Portions of the results of this study were discussed with Mr. Erwin and Mr. Steve Savage of Coughlin Porter Lundeen (project • structural engineer) as our conclusions were developed. GeoEngineers presented the results of our Phase I and II portions of the site study in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington" dated April 13, 1988. Our Phase I study included an evaluation of the historical mining hazard and fault/eanhquake hazard and the Phase II study presented the results of specific foundation explorations and design and construction recommendations. It has been our pleasure to work with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of our report or if we may be of funher service, please call. Yours very truly, I . . : . GeoE ineers, Inc. • • B McFadden, P.E. • roject Manager i l Jon W. Koloski Principal •• JJM:JWK:cros • Document ID: 0693044.R File No. 0693-044-02 GeoEngineers,Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond,WA 98052 Telephone(206)S61-6000 Fax(206)861-6050 | `^ = ' ^ | CONTENTS � ' ��. � PoqeNo. '' INTRODUCTION 1 1 ' SCOPE i ' 2 SITE CONDITIONS � i GENERAL 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ^ 3 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS 3 / ' CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS3 i 3 / GENERAL SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 3 4 � FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS � Water Storage Tanks 4 �= Booster Pump Station " G ^ ' Lateral Resistance G ` UTILITY TRENCHES ' DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 7 ' SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 7 ' 8 ROADWAY PAVEMENT DESIGN ' Q � LIMITATIONS ` [� FIGURES Fioure No. / � Site Plan 1 / Generalized Geologic Cross Sections 2 ' 3 Site Respo nse Spectra, Subduction Zone Earthquake ' Site Response Spectra, Seattle Fault Earthquake4 . ' ' ' Pooe No� APPENDICES � ' � A,1 Appendix A ' ppe ' No ' APPENDAPPENDIXA FIGURES Fioure ' � A,1 ` Soil Classification System A,2 ''' A,5 | ` Logs of Test Pits } Paqe No. 8'1 Appendix B ' Summary of Poten�aJ Geologic Hazards _ ' B'1 Cosd Mining Activity ' B-2 ` . Seismic Considerations Appendix C ' Sa|ootod References C'1 ' \ i �a, vv oap»�44��}1»n03zz90 � * va � n } n , " , � � I REPORT PHASE III GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED ROLLING HILLS RESERVOIR AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR CITY OF RENTON INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our Phase III geotechnical engineering services for the proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station to be located in Renton, Washington. The site is located south and west of the intersection of Puget Drive Southeast and Edmonds Avenue Southeast, as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. GeoEngineers presented the results of our Phase I and II portions of the site study in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services,Proposed Rolling Hills Reservoir and Booster Pump Station, Renton, Washington" dated April 13, 1988. Our Phase I study included an evaluation of the historical mining hazard and fault/earthquake hazard and the Phase II study presented the results of specific foundation explorations and design and construction recommendations. We understand that the proposed project will consist of constructing. two water storage • tanks, each with a 4-million-gallon capacity. The tanks are expected to be about 40 feet high with their base at Elevation 453 and overflow at Elevation 490. The tanks will be about 130 feet in diameter and be constructed as at-grade steel structures. We also understand that the south tank shown on our site plan will be constructed at this time and the other tank in the future. A booster pump station will be located adjacent to the new tanks and will pump to the city's existing elevated tank located on the site. SCOPE • .The purpose of our services for this phase of the project is to provide geotechnical design . recommendations based on the subsurface soil and ground water information obtained during our 1988 study. The specific scope of our services consists of the following tasks: 1. Attend one meeting with representatives of RH2 Engineering to discuss the design elements . for the project. 2. Review available soil and ground water information obtained during our previous study and for nearby studies. 3. Review information and describe the risks associated with previously identified potential • geologic hazards at the site. 4. Describe and characterize soil and ground water conditions at the site. J G e o E n g i n c e r s 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 5. Provide recommendations for site preparation and earthwork including estimated stripping depths, use of on-site soil for structural fill and trench backfill, and requirements for imported fill. This will also include recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill and a discussion of wet weather construction considerations. 6. Provide recommendations for temporary excavation and trench side slopes, and permanent cut and fill slope inclinations. This will include recommendations for dewatering and temporary excavation shoring, if necessary. 7. Establish design values for foundation support, estimated postconstruction settlement of the proposed facilities, and active and passive lateral earth pressures for design of below grade elements. This will include the coefficient of base friction to resist lateral loads. 8. Provide recommendations for access road construction and design pavement section. 9. Provide seismic design coefficients based on the UBC (Uniform Building Code) seismic criteria. 10. Prepare a written report presenting our findings and recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS GENERAL GeoEngineers completed an assessment of geologic ha7.2rds in the project area as part of our 1988 study. The results of that study and comments regarding studies and information available since then pertaining to potential geologic hazards is provided in Appendix B. The summary in Appendix B pertains to both coal mine and seismic hazards. Based on our review i and recent research, it is our opinion that there is a low risk of hazard from the presence of deep coal mines below the site. The "Conclusions and Recommendations" section of this report provides our recommendations for reducing seismic risks. -SURFACE CONDITIONS - The site is approximately 10 acres in area, with current development limited to the city of Renton's existing elevated water-tank. We noted several minor excavations or areas of ground - modification during our site reconnaissance and field exploration program as part of our previous :study. The site has been logged at least once with only scattered evergreen trees remaining. Most of the site is covered with relatively thick brush and small- to moderate-sized deciduous trees. A topographic ridge trends in a generally north to south direction across the site. The east flank of the ridge is a very gentle slope, dropping about 10 feet of elevation in 300 feet. The i. west flank is a more moderate slope, dropping about 10 feet in 100 feet, and then sloping slightly steeper toward the property boundary. The general site topography is shown in Figure 1. • G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 r SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were evaluated as part of our previous study by excavating eight test pits at the locations shown in Figure 1. A detailed discussion of the exploration procedures and logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. The subsurface conditions encountered in our test pits were relatively uniform. An exception was Test Pit 5, which encountered about 1 foot of fill soils with considerable organic matter apparently associated with previous grading performed on the site. The explorations - indicate the site is mantled by a layer of forest duff, sod and topsoil up to about 0.5 feet in thickness. Greater depths of organics should be expected in densely vegetated areas. The topsoil generally overlies a variable thickness of loose to medium dense brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel. Occasional roots were noted in several of the test pits to a depth of about 2 feet. Below a depth which varied from about 3 to 6-1/2 feet of depth, very dense gray silty sand with gravel, occasional cobbles and boulders was encountered in all the test pits. This stratum is referred to geologically as glacial till and has been compressed under the weight of glacial ice. The upper loose to medium dense soils represent the weathered horizon of the glacial till. The subsurface conditions are shown in the Generalized Geologic Cross Sections, Figure 2. The locations of the sections are shown in Figure 1. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Very slow ground water seepage was observed within a sandy layer of the glacial till in Test Pit 1. Slow ground water seepage was also observed in Test Pit 8 at the bottom of the weathered horizon. No ground water seepage was observed in any of the other test pits. Fluctuations in ground water conditions should be expected as a result of changes in season, precipitation and other factors. A perched ground water condition likely occurs seasonally at the bottom of the weathered till layer which overlies very dense relatively impermeable unweathered till. - • - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL - • - The two water storage tanks and booster pump station can be constructed on the site as � proposed provided site earthwork and foundation preparation is completed as recommended below. The tanks and building footings should be founded on the medium dense to dense native till or properly placed structural fill. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK The following recommendations apply to all earthwork and structural fill placement and compaction. . • Portions of the site where structures or access roads will be located should be stripped of vegetation and topsoil: Based on the explorations, we expect that stripping depths will average about 6 inches. G e o E n g i n e e r s 3 File No. 0693-044-02.1130/032296 • Additional stripping depths may be necessary where trees are removed and if the site soils are softened during construction. • Temporary cuts are expected to encounter weathered and unweathered glacial till. • The exposed subgrade must be compacted to a firm, nonyielding condition prior to placing structural fill or formwork. • For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts into the weathered till be sloped at a maximum of 11/2H:1V (horizontal to vertical) and unweathered till 1H:1V for cuts less than about 8 feet in height. • Sloughing or spalling of either of these zones could occur at these slope angles and some .44 modifications for safety purposes may be necessary. Construction grades should prevent surface water from entering the excavation. Erosion protection such as plastic sheeting should be applied during wet weather conditions. • The native weathered and unweathered till will be suitable for structural fill in roadway areas, but only if the moisture content can be controlled. *We recommend using imported - structural fill for support of tank and building foundations, and floor slabs. • Imported structural fill should consist of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines by weight relative to the fraction of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. This imported • fill material should be free of rock fragments larger than 6 inches, debris and organic materials. • Structural fill placed in proposed foundation and floor slab areas must be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD (maximum dry density) (per ASTM D-1557). • Structural fill placed in utility trenches should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except in any areas to be paved. In these areas the upper 2 feet below finished subgrade must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the same standard. • - The site soils possess a high silt cortent. These soils are easily disturbed during wet • • weather conditions. We recommend the earthwork be performed during the drier summer months. Construction traffic should be minimized in the foundation area during wet weather. It may-be necessary to blanket the glacial till soils with pit run or crushed rock in order to - • minimize disturbance during wet weather construction activities. It will be necessary to recompact or remove soils loosened or softened during construction as discussed above. Specific 3 erosion/sediment control facilities must be included in the grading design because of high erosion potential of the on-site soils. 1 FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS • • Water Storage Tanks • The tanks should be supported on a ringwall footing or mat foundation with a thickened edge. G e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 : -1 • The foundation should bear on the dense to very dense native till encountered in our test pits. A mud mat should be placed immediately after foundation excavation to protect the subgrade. • Ringwall footings should be at least 18 inches wide and extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade for frost protection. • Provided the subgrade is prepared as recommended above, an allowable bearing pressure of 5,000 psf(pounds per square foot) may be used for the total of dead and long-term live loads. 1,4 • This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third for short duration live loads such as those resulting from wind and seismic loads. • We recommend that the floor slab or tank bottom be supported on at least a 6-inch thickness of crushed rock compacted to at least 95 percent MDD. • All trench bacldill within the tank area should consists of imported structural fill, as described above, compacted to at least 95 percent MDD. •h. We estimate that postconstrtiction settlement of the tank, supported as recommended above, should be less than 1/2 inch under full loading with differential settlem,nt of less than 1/4 inch. This settlement should be largely completed after the initial full height water test is done. Booster Pump Station • The booster pump station building can be supported on conventional spread footings founded either on the native dense till or on a pad of structural fill. • The zone of structural fill supporting foundation elements should extend laterally beyond the foundation edges a horizontal distance at least equal to the thickness of the structural fill placed. • The building footings should be at least 18 inches wide. • For frost protection,the footings should be founded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent rs: finished grade. • • • Footings supported on native subgrade or a structural fill pad extending to the native dense fill prepared as recommended above can be designed using an allowable bearing pressure • of 3,000 psf for the total of dead and long-term live loads. • This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third for short-term live loads such as those resulting from wind or seismic forces. • A base course consisting of at least 4 inches of free-draining gravel containing less than 3 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a • capillary break. • • A vapor barrier such as plastic sheeting may be used to provide added protection against the upward migration of moisture into the floor slab, if appropriate. • A 2-inch-thick layer of sand should be placed over the vapor barrier for protection against damage during concrete placement. G e o E n g i n e c r s 5 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 We estimate that the postconstruction settlement of both footings and floor slab, supported as recommended above, will be less than 1/2 inch. Most of this settlement is expected to occur as loads are applied. Lateral Resistance • Passive resistance should be evaluated using an equivalent fluid density of 350 pcf(pounds per cubic foot) on the sides of the tank ringwall and the pump house footings. This value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. • Resistance to passive pressure should be calculated from below a depth of 1 foot measured from the lowest adjacent ground surface unless the adjacent area is paved. In that case, passive resistance can be calculated from the finished pavement surface. • This passive resistance applies where structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent MDD extends outward at least two times the depth of the footing or tank ringwall. • Frictional resistance can be evaluated using 0.4 for the coefficient of base friction against foundation elements. This value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. We recommend that all footing excavations be evaluated by a representative of our firm immediately before any mud mat structural fill, crushed rock, sand and gravel, steel or concrete is placed, to determine if the work is completed in accordance with our recommendations and that subsurface conditions are as expected. UTILITY TRENCHES We expect that utility trench excavations will be constructed using conventional open-cut techniques. The following recommendations apply to excavation and backfill. • All shoring and temporary slopes should conform to applicable local, state and federal - . safety regulations. - For planning purposes, temporary excavations within the upper layer of weathered till ,which are in excess of 4 feet but less than 8 feet in depth should be sloped at no steeper than 11/H:1V unless lateral support of the trench sides is provided. The portions of : temporary excavations within the underlying unweathered till should be sloped at no steeper than 1H:1V. • . Ground water seepage, if encountered during excavation, may be controlled by ditching and using sump pumps, as necessary. • Trench backfill may consist of the weathered and unweathered till if adequate compaction can be achieved. If construction takes place during periods of wet weather imported structural fill may be required to achieve adequate compaction. • Soil imported for trench backfill should meet the requirements of structural fill presented above. • Backfill placement and compaction should meet the requirements presented above for structural fill. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that a perforated perimeter drain be installed at the footing elevation of the proposed booster pump building and at the bottom of any equipment sumps which extend below footing elevation. A perforated drain should also be placed for the reservoirs if the site grades are such that hydrostatic pressures could develop below the tank bottom. These perforated drains should be collected and routed by a gravity tightline to a suitable discharge point. Provisions should be made for water collected under the bottom of the reservoir to drain into the perimeter drain or other suitable discharge. Surface drainage systems should be installed in conjunction with the proposed booster pump building and water storage tanks. Roof drains should be tightlined to a suitable discharge point well away from the tanks and booster pump building. Roof drains must not be discharged at a location or in a manner that water can back up into the i,. footing or subslab drains. The ground surface adjacent to the tanks and building should be sloped to drain away from the structures. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The project site is located within the Puget Sound region which is a moderately active seismic area. We spoke with Mr. Steve Savage of Coughlin Porter Lundeen (project structural engineers) and understand that water storage tanks are typically designed to resist seismically induced lateral loads by using a pseudo-dynamic design approach in accordance with either the UBC (Uniform Building Code) Section 1632 or AWWA (American Water Works Association) D-100 methodology for steel tank design. Both approaches establish a ground acceleration based • • on zonation maps for the United States. According to the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, the project site is located within Seismic Risk Zone 3 with a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.30. This zone generally corresponds to a ground acceleration of about 0.30g, where g is the gravitational constant. As defined in the Uniform Building Code, the site is best classified as a Soil Profile Type Si. This • . profile type consists of "dense or stiff soil conditions where the depth of soil exceeds 200 feet." _ • .We also completed a site specific seismic evaluation to determine the ground response during an earthquake and the maximum likely ground acceleration for two scenarios: (1) a subduction zone.earthquake off the coast of Washington, and (2) an event along the Seattle Fault • which is represented by a series of east-west trending faults which extend through the Seattle area. The site specific evaluation was completed using the SHAKE2 computer program developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley. Subduction zone earthquakes located along the coast of Washington are thought to be capable of generating earthquakes of magnitude 8.5 or greater. Earthquakes along the subduction zone are generally located at depths of about 35 kilometers and at a distance of about 150 to 270 kilometers from the site. . The energy and magnitude of ground motion for these earthquakes, particularly the moderate to high frequency motions, are generally attenuated (reduced) prior to reaching the Puget Sound area. Based on our site specific evaluation, it is our opinion that G e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 ground accelerations of 0.14g to 0.20g may be expected at the site. These accelerations are based on peak bedrock accelerations of 0.09g to 0.13g and the soil conditions at the site. These ground accelerations are well within the general range of accelerations applied by the pseudo dynamic approach of the UBC or AWWA. However, the period of the ground motions will be longer which may develop higher dynamic forces within a tank from the sloshing liquid. A site response spectra is included in Figure 3 for a subduction zone event. The UBC response spectra is also shown in Figure 3. A shallow nearby fault such as the Seattle Fault may result in relatively high ground motions resulting from a moderate magnitude earthquake. The Seattle Fault has been studied and evaluated for years. New developments in research indicate that the Seattle Fault is a series of ki four or more east-west trending, south dipping faults which extends from the Kitsap Peninsula �..., to the Cascade foothills. The fault zone passes below the south portion of Elliott Bay and extends east to Issaquah generally along the Interstate 90 corridor. The fault is located about 10 kilometers below the ground surface and about 12 kilometers north of the site. The likely maximum magnitude of earthquakes generated along this fault is about 7 to 7.5. Based on our site specific evaluation, it is our opinion that ground accelerations of 0.60g to 0.80g may occur ' = at the site during a strong earthquake. These accelerations are based on peak bedrock accelerations of 0.40g to 0.57g and the soil conditions at the site. A ground response spectra is presented in Figure 4 for a Seattle Fault event along with the UBC response spectra. Our analysis suggests that relatively high levels of ground shaking will likely occur at the foundation level of the tanks should an earthquake occur along the Seattle Fault or along the subduction zone off the coast of Washington. These two events represent maximum credible earthquakes which implies that the level of ground shaking is never the maximum that can be expected. They are not included in the standard design values contained in the UBC, Zone III areas. In addition, the UBC standard for zone III areas is for a period of ground shaking on the -order of 30 seconds or less. The subduction zone event.could cause ground shaking which might last two minutes or more. The number of cycles and duration of shaking should be considered in the tank design. • We recommend that the structural engineer evaluate the effect that the ground motions : presented herein may have on the structural design of the tank. This can then be compared with :the structural requirements for a standard UBC design. This comparison would allow a cost evaluation of upgrading the tank design to withstand a larger earthquake than the standard UBC design earthquake. The city of Renton could then use this information to decide whether they 1 =' are willing to pay an additional cost to reduce potential risks during a maximum credible earthquake: • ROADWAY PAVEMENT DESIGN The following pavement recommendations are based on typical traffic conditions for this type of facility. We expect that much of the traffic will consist of light trucks and that occasional heavy trucks will access the area for maintenance. Very slow vehicle speeds are also assumed. G e o E n g i n e e r s 8 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 .• The exposed subgrade in roadway and pavement areas should be prepared as recommended above under "Site Preparation." The subgrade should be proofrolled immediately prior to placing the subbase material. Soft or disturbed areas which develop in the subgrade should be removed and replaced with granular fill compacted as recommended to provide adequate pavement support. We recommend that the pavement section for the access road consist of 2 inches of Class B • asphalt concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock, provided the subgrade is prepared as recommended and that pavement construction is done during a period of extended dry weather. • The pavement section presented above is based on having a relatively dry and properly compacted subgrade as defined above on which to place the subbase, base course and paving. All new Class B asphalt concrete pavement materials and placement should generally conform to Section 5-04, WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) 1991 Standard • Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. Asphalt concrete should be • compacted to at least 92 percent of Rice density. All crushed rock should conform to Section 9- 03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. The crushed rock and subbase where recommended should each be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. It is important to pavement performance that baclf-ill in utility trenches located in areas to be paved also be compacted as specified for structural fill. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the city of Renton, RH2 Engineering, and other members • of the project team for use in design of portions of the development. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, • conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The project was in the design development stage-at the time this report was prepared. We - expect that'further consultation regarding specific design elements may be necessary. When the { design has been finalized, we recommend that GeoEngineers be retained to review the final • design drawings and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. Our scope does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. • There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of explorations. Variations may also occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be . included in the project budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation - should be provided by our firm during construction to (1) determine if the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, (2) to provide recommendations for design GeoEngineers 9 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and (3) evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply'with the contract plans and specifications. 4 O . -„ Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Respectfully submitted, • ` ;NS cpq�" - '�4, wA ,b - GeoE gineers, In . 9�3 B McFadden, P.E. L . 4_ - ISM� � Project Manager EXPIRES 314/s.7 ��`�/ �•/ E . Jon W. Koloski Principal JJM:JWK:ctrs Document ID: 0693044.R • iI - G e o E n g i n e e r s 10 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • • • ��t�.," \; .,�. • • 1 •:v• .. r.. / • _ - • • .Y„ i�• .v.I ./•.�,•� am!• -1 r q; r I•i ;�. >, _ + f.' ' -_i.. • •i • 't ':•%: •(: .i'1 i` • 1 r' �:'•.r'i ,/ .1.'�;' L1 • , E,.... . .. �,./•• 4, /, • i •/ • • • • • • 7,')^..�.y�i. .�. •♦_ f r!t: ,•l• .- •/. . ii' ., rj.:.'• l:;\.:�".1 y • 1 /:�,�.' •4 1 ' -r, �� 't• ''R. 'r'� am \ il:ate. 9r.'1 ,/ •-• 1, 1 t' • • �'•• . -;l . f y 1 • .. i. •" • , ,G, .` .%•. '.. t, v -I. ^::; d • J • : ��:!. .'t {` 3 ( t ^t :'/ •t • t . ti` •''i~ l 1 ^..".. ,\ ' •'\, . • • 1, t • • • / / r 1 t' I \ 1 • - • '`i ♦ t • �. Q 1 J /l '. • r t • •• ,( • • • ., a''t' f, ' 7 t•�� • .'. .. 1- ••• '.. 1., .;,,A'' J,,• 1.I:t • \! '' .` ;'`'.L♦:,.v ' .,•• l• �.,' •� 1 ,1 ♦ • ;•',J`• '; ',':'` " t ^ 7: l ,( -. i it - ,' .•I •t'.'` t t .-:i. -� y • • r •t' • yl.S • • • • ,/ 1 1 •1 r } ✓•. •.. .t • • , 'N - '� • • .1t ' rr. ♦ • • ..•1 1 • • .N I • • `':• ,1. r t,i- • •,1'.i ••�'�ti• ' :".1• 7. • . • • • A�4'�.7, • r •,�.-.1/11• 'J•.., '! ,',: •I 1' 'i,�7.. .i.: 'J v •jc • I•'i '.1• :'i•l.11N, ;.:♦ • • .' r.'I ••'.•f • j i•� • :•" •• . I. • •ram •'+;.` '•r ry. '. 1 't '/. , ,'•¢, .,yL �• n • ..; .'j, r _ •• r • 1 ,• :••7 \' •J1• 1' .";. i ./ ! ^'4. 1.•'•° !.:1'y "r .. . '-~'� _..._'+, �•. "�,.v.r►q, �„rr.ww, '"-r...�...y '�++.•.4 .rw�'.n �+�.-•1 >•^�'• '.1,�., .__.r.., .__� .1 _..�_ i APPENDIX A i _ The subsurface conditions at the site were explored March 8, 1988 by excavating eight test I pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. The explorations locations 1 were determined in the field by measuring from survey stakes provided by others indicating the 1 proposed reservoir locations. The elevations were determined based on their location with respect to topographic information presented on a preliminary plan by RH2 Engineering dated 2/4/88. The test pits were excavated to approximately 10 feet of depth using a rubber-tired backhoe L. under subcontract to our firm. The test pit explorations were continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who maintained a detailed log of the soils encountered, 1` obtained representative soil samples, and observed ground water conditions. Soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the soil classification system shown in Figure A-1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-4. All soils samples were brought to our laboratory for further examination. Al samples were tested to determine their moisture content which is presented on the logs. I, 1 - r - I ! . I I T . G e o E n g i n e e r s A - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • i:i. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 1 GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME - GRAVEL CLEAN GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL I SOILS More Than 50% i of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES on No. 4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL • I • More Than 50% I SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND Retained on No. 200 Sieve i _ SP POORLY-GRADED SAND I.. > More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES 1 No. 4 Sieve SC CLAYEY SAND • FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY Liquid Limit I: 1 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY , Less Than 50 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% r INORGANIC Passes CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve CH Liquid Limit 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY,ORGANIC SILT • HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS V - PT PEAT 1 . " NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. . Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch • in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. .yam Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2. . •Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on t ASTM D2487-90. - Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data,visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. - • - • " a �., " . 0 . - U co —.Vi - SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM co iii Geo�0 Engineers 0 FIGURE A-1 Lvt yr t GJ I I I I 1 : DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL • DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 1 j[ Approximate Elevation: 459.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil 1 0.3- 3.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots (medium dense, i; moist)(weathered till) 3.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles and sandy layers at 6.0 to 7.0 feet (dense to very dense,moist)(glacial till) Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 IF.' • Very slow ground water seepage from sandy layers 6.0 to 7.0 feet " Disturbed soil sample obtained at 6.0 feet (12.9%moisture content) 1 . TEST PIT 2 i ~ Approximate Elevation: 458.0 feet 0.0- 0.5 Sod and topsoil 1 j 0.5- 1.5 SM Light brown silty fine sand with a race of gravel(loose,moist) l 1.5- 4.5 SM Mottled brown and gray silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(loose,moist to wet) (weathered till) t 1 Grades to medium dense at 3.0 feet } 4.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 1111 " ' No ground water seepage observed . Disturbed soil sample obtained at 3.0 feet 111 (15.7%moisture content) 1 ' 1. 1I I '. t . THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. ,��. • LOG OF TEST PIT Geo kO Engineer S FIGURE A 2 _ LOG OF TEST PIT • DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP 1 GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION -? (FEET) SYMBOL TEST PIT 3 . Approximate Elevation: 457.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil 0.3- 4.0 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 2.0 feet(loose, moist)(weathered till) -."? Grades to medium dense at 2.0 feet 4.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) f'-' Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 . No ground water seepage observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 1.0 foot (19.9%moisture content) • TEST PIT 4 Approximate Elevation: 460.0 feet 0.0- 0.5 Sod and topsoil 1 0.5- 5.0 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 2.5 feet(loose, moist)(weathered till) A 3-foot-diameter weathered boulder at 2.0 feet Grades to medium dense at 4.0 feet 5.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) . • Test pit completed at.10.0 feet on 03/09/88 1 No ground water seepage observed j . Disturbed soil sample obtained at 7.0 feet • .- - (16.3%moisture content) N • i - . " . .- THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. �� LOG OF TEST PIT Geo��En ineers �� j FIGURE A 3 1 LOG OF TEST PIT 1 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION • (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION r-. TEST PIT 5 1 Approximate Elevation: 459.0 feet 1 0.0- 1.0 SM/OL Dark brown silty fine sand with topsoil and abundant organic matter(loose,moist) (fill) 1.0- 1.5 Decayed wood and topsoil • 1.5 3.0 • SM Light brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and abundant roots(loose,moist) 3.0- 6.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(loose,moist)(weathered till) Grading to medium dense at 4.0 feet 6.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 No ground water seepage observed JJJ • Disturbed soil sample obtained at 7.0 feet (12.0%moisture content) TEST PIT 6 Approximate Elevation: 460.0 feet i- 1 • 0.0- 0.4 Sod and topsoil 0.4- 4.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel and occasional roots to 1.5 feet(loose, moist)(weathered till) Grades to medium dense at 2.0 feet • "4.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with.gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) • Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 • No ground water seepage observed . . Disturbed soil sample obtained at 2.0 feet - (18.2%moisture content) • • • • • • . THE DEPTH$ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. �� LOG OF TEST PIT Geoff"Engineers FIGURE A-4 i '= - LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL - DESCRIPTION i i J TEST PIT 7 I Approximate Elevation: 461.0 feet 0.0- 0.3 Sod and topsoil 0.3- 3.0 SM Brown silty fine sand with a trace of gravel(medium dense,moist)(weathered till) 3.0- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles(very dense,moist)(glacial till) IA Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 • No ground water seepage observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 2.0 feet (16.4%moisture content) t: TEST PIT 8 Approximate Elevation: 452.0 feet 0.0- 0.5 Forest duff 0.5- 1.5 SM Dark brown silty fine sand with occasional roots(loose,moist) 1 . 1.5- 6.5 SM.MIL Mottled brown and gray silty sand and fine sandy silt(medium dense/stiff,moist to wet)(weathered till) 6.5- 10.0 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (dense to very dense, moist) (glacial rill) - Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03/09/88 r . Slow ground water seepage observed from 5.0 to 6.5 feet t; ... .. . • .:-- . • . J' • i: . ll F. Jt • ._ THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS,ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT,ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. j �L .. LOG OF TEST PIT Geo��Engineers FIGURE A-5 1 a it T.• i • I� 11. J, • ;,+nl c 4( ; RE,NITON • •, SITE _. -1 itie 1�1toQov , r SE • C / t' , ‘...-,g it �•• +:��. ' \\ -\ 4 rf- .. .. .,.. . . , ..1 -..,..,s. , • V- tT - - M11T,A Msg..Y.i. Existing Elevated . ` + : _ - "7._ . ly Wit: _�t . / / c--' • Water Tank i / 711 rla u ,1 - & - y ` .71 / I - VICINITY MAP No Scale / /4Sl -------"-- -- TP-5 2 / } ) • ;-I _., TP-8 / i1 1 - Iiti_-)2723-2 Proposed 4.0 MG Ground Level Reservoir P_7� / \ 7 . ciLProposed Pump Station p 100 200 4 •jTP-6 t TP-3 e' !�• SCALE IN FEET 1 I b. Ago . Je, :', . 7 ��0 o( / c Proposed 4.0 MG Ground P�� jt.- QJ - EXPLANATION: • A�0Level Reservoir Z 1 - • : - .. - ( TP-4 �' -----------1 a �o� TP-1- - TEST PIT 2 . �J _� P } • • . (.\.' '''... -- , GEOLOGIC OSS SECTION Q. P ii,it---) (SEE FIGURECR 2) ON l N /./ - Site Boundary- 7. - i_ N O• . V'. - I I . L_ C) 8 • • ��11;', _ SITE PLAN REFERENCE: UNTITLED PRELIMIt!ARY PLAN DATED 2/r+/88 PROVIDED BY RH2 ENGINEERING . Geo�OEllgiilee1S FIGURE 1 I .�.' --:Y .'yn �:a.t lJ'rtkri..,'....'.�.1-.��—•:.=<.'.L.,v.. --a •A. 'f.::..a<i *A*x^fr_'tfcv _:� ^I;a .: �,_ .. - � 1� - • 't �ff _"' .' f.:er ce�v-Y..�.iJ..7:,�•R.�fl aal.,dO.r i_a h..w�,,:y;.:s ue..Viim--g. `� ';.cJ - ..a.,.-..Y..,�--C. 1 ca r_S"� w' '�Y 4< ' - - - ' ts: a alc� Sri`z4 Y .. • i . iri ..:-- _ 4 • N y,�a` . 1 L ----111-= -- al r- co••:,, co CI) , -- I._, 1 I 460 - M —`� r SM' � 460• - 1L_ / I SM 'SM ._ . / Weathered Till LL sm • , u_ 1 H . . . 0 455-� -455 0 SM- Unweathered Till ? 1 r c, • —SM ? 9 1 Cu- -- -----:"..t_ - ? W SM SM Proposed Bottom Proposed Bottom • 450 - of Tank A _ of Tank B -450 c [2EXPLANATION: ' r - a. I. TEST PIT NUMBER SECTION A - A' - I SM SOIL CLASSIFICATION (SEE APPENDIX A FOR EXPLANATION) 2' =SM�- GROUND WATER SEEPAGE O F . `o Notes 1. Refer to Figure 1 for location of cross section. co c, N c� 2. Subsurface conditions shown are based on I N I I 1[ O. widely spaced explorations and should be } t--O O. O. O.I- considered approximate. Actual subsurface I I conditions may vary from those shown. 460- .�- SM -460 _ - - _ - _' _ SM _ 3. Elevations, topography and proposed tank �j Weathered Till locations are based on unititled preliminary plan Lii - dated 2/4/88 provided by RH2 Engineering. SM • ---------- SM---------, 0 Fill / el. ? • .c / SM c c c 455- -455 co o Unweathered Till SM o co ca Ti HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1' = 50' e SM ? lu VERTICAL SCALE: 1' = 5' ._ T CO '-SM / L VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: X10 - o _ Proposed Bottom cl.-450- _SM of Tanks -450 Y ML -• / • -� n - CV � ---"/ ,, � SM SECTIONB - B' 8 GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS - Geo s.g Engineers , .._ • - - 1• • - .. ,.... ... • ... ,. • . • '• . * -• -. - .• 1:3 . r • • ., 1 1 1[.. 1 lid 0.8 T I r 11 I 1 • 0 .7 T 1 • • • 1 1 Z I k ) o P 0.5 - I I, 1 •-tr < I 1 w -II i, N.., o 0.4 --1 o I; ! < l' \ i cc I- \ N i 1 0.8 i I , co 0.2 •-•. t -- --. -- 3-• 0.1 - --. -. -- - - _ 1 "ki 0 , , , • , , , 0• _1 • 2 3 4 5 6 t. --.° . • • .- . • - - PERIOD (seconds) - . . i 1.47 : • t , , • ^J . EXPLANATION: • ) - ? • PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK . '' .. . • Ns. . ACCELERATION = 0.13g I? . • PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK ti ig • . .• ACCELERATION = 0.09g • •.9 .- ' . _ - - -. - UBC RESPONSE SPECTRA • • - • , . . . SITE RESPONSE SPECTRA -- il,!.,'• SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKE Geo ii,'"•;.1:Engineers ' •k.•••• FIGURE 3 ... 1 t 1 F. r 1 ]r /i 1 }s I 1: 2.5 1 l' Z o • 2 I- cc W v 1.5 — 1\ U Q 'i. J a Q - . o 1 i \ 1-1-1 ,— \ o 0.5 5N 1 N N 1 _ 0: . 1 2 3 • 4 5 6 PERIOD (seconds) r ' . ' EXPLANATION: I PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK - - ACCELERATION = 0.57g PEAK HORIZONTAL BEDROCK 1 I a,' : . ACCELERATION = 0.40g• �{ ,� — — - - UBC RESPONSE SPECTRA i . . • i / 11. SITE RESPONSE SPECTRA Geo�OEngineerS SEATTLE FAULT EARTHQUAKE l �/ b FIGURE 4 - - - .1 ...r,rr - .+..r• �_ F-7 ice•, • . . e .. ' - .�., • o I � s;:, 'e: \ r , ./ \ ° '' it ' t , :y. J 1 J '+ /. ( /• • . • . . '•• •\.' r•` / ,•.: gY • I ; .., I .• f .- ` . lam. •5..' : ••'. I • "1•- `t''. .�• \ )• . • l I /`. ' om • ;,.. 1'� '•.+' •i` �� / -it. .t b!; Y.I1. �.r r. 4 . r 'Y s. • ''' "',1\ a/. •Ia 5, r '/•' • 1 r' 'a, \ . ' /•.•' 't ., :, 7 :- r. • • 1— !l ' ', •1• . `. ,', mil. 1:= APPENDIX B , 11 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL GEOLOGIC HAZARDS COAL MINING ACTIVITY GeoEngineers provided the following summary of coal mining activity in our 1988 report. 1 No significant research has been completed since then for the project area revealing additional details for our summary. I Similar to many areas in the Renton and South King County vicinity, underground mining activity occurred below the site in the early 1900s. We performed a literature search to determine the extent of the coal mining activity that was undertaken below the site. Based on this I information, we evaluated the potential hazard this historic mining might pose to the proposed project. A list of selected references is presented in Appendix B. liqa i . _ The referenced Morrison/Knudsen report presents a chronological history of the mining activities in the Renton Mine. They are summarized briefly in Table 1. • TABLE 1 -17 Year Activity 1874 Opened by the Renton Coal Company 1886 Closed ] .. 1895 Reopened by the Renton Cooperative Company 1901 Bought out by the Seattle Electric Company i - 1920 Closed 1922 Reopened by the Strain Coal Company 1933 Closed • The primary workings of the Renton Mine consisted of the No. 3 seam. The No. 3 seam . is documented to be about 11'/ feet thick, dipping toward the east at about 7 to 10 degrees. A .1. , map of the mined out area with an overlay of the project site is presented in Figure 2. It should be noted that there are discrepancies in the literature reporting the history of the mine. The mine i'r4 . records indicate that about 95 percent of the coal was extracted from the No. 3 seam. However, . • a consultant report(Evans 1920) estimated that about 21 percent of the coal was mined out based 1 , on reported quantities. It should also be noted that our experience on similar projects indicates that survey data of mines prepared prior to 1930 do not have a high degree of accuracy. 1 • We have presented the.outline of a relatively large "room" that may have been entirely ,... mined out below the site. The historical map indicates the eastern and western extremities of this large room were mined out; however, the reference map fades out in the middle and it is unclear jwhether the entire area between these extremities actually was mined. We have shown it on the . figure as the entire room having been mined out to be conservative. • G e o E n g i n e e r s B - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 i 1 The mine records indicate approximately 875 feet to 990 feet of overburden rock and soil above the mined out area. The relative thickness of overburden above the mine workings across . , the site is indicated in Figure 2. The geologic map of the site indicates a relatively thin veneer of glacial drift soils overlying the bedrock in this area. We estimate that the depth of glacial till soils is probably less than 100 feet across the site.1 .A surface expression of mine collapse (such as a pit) is unprecedented for a mine with this thickness of overburden in all case histories and technical reference papers that we reviewed. A slight possibility exists that downwarping of the ground surface may occur over a very large area, I especially if the large room was mined out, as indicated in Figure 2. The maximum potential 7;‘., vertical displacement is estimated to be on the order of 2 feet or less. The surface manifestation II , - of this downwarping would occur over a very large area extending well beyond the boundaries in of the project site. A significant percentage of any resultant downwarping may have already j occurred since the mine has not been worked since 1933. Based on the average 930-foot thickness of overburden, case histories, and our analyses, we conclude that there is a very low risk of any hazard from the previous mining activity to reservoirs located on this site. t ' SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 3 . The seismotectonics of the Puget lowland are very complex and not well understood due to the thick glacial deposits over the bedrock. The primary cause of the seismicity in the Pacific f_:• Northwest is believed to be the result of the interaction of the Pacific and North American litho- spheric plates, further interrelated with the smaller Juan de Fuca plate. The larger earthquakes ti' . in the region are thought to be subduction-related with tension in the lower plate; however, the - evidence is inconsistent. While the Puget Sound region has been subject to many seismic events, - - the two major historical events affecting the local area are the Olympia earthquake of 1949 and the Seattle-Tacoma earthquake of 1965. The 1949 earthquake is the strongest recorded . "earthquake in the Puget Sound region, with a Richter magnitude of 7.1 and felt over an area of ] , - . - at least 150,000 square miles. .The 1965 earthquake was a magnitude 6.5 event. Earthquakes of similar or larger magnitudes are possible in the Puget Sound region in the future. It should jm . be noted that the larger recorded Puget Sound earthquakes have occurred at relatively great - depths without any associated surface faulting. • Two faults are mapped in the site area. We performed a literature search to evaluate the 1 . geologic conditions and geometry of the faults mapped with respect to potential seismic hazards to the project. A list of selected references is presented in Appendix C. 1 Bedrock in the Puget Sound lowlands is generally covered by a relatively thick layer of glacial drift and more recent deposits. This relatively thick mantling of soil generally masks the structural fabric of the bedrock and therefore very little is known about the fabric of the bedrock i . _ . . in'the Puget Sound lowland area. In the Renton and South King County vicinity, the bedrock - is generally closer to the ground surface, thus permitting practical and economical mining of coal seams. Faults in the bedrock formations were frequently encountered during the mining. These faults were typically mapped; therefore, much more detailed information with respect to the G e o E n g i n e e r s B - 2 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 bedrock fabric is known in mined areas. The bedrock is of Eocene age which dates back about 60 million years. Soon after deposition of the coal beds and encasing sandstone, the sediments 1 were folded and faulted by tectonic forces, probably in late Miocene time, about.18 million years : ago. Two faults, known as Fault No. 3 and Fault No. 4, were mapped in the Renton Mine a within the downward projected footprint of the project site. The approximate locations of these faults are shown in Figure 2. These faults are described in some detail in the literature (Evans 1 1920). The faults are described as being "normal faults," each having 7 feet of offset. The planes of Fault No. 3 and Fault No. 4 dip at 75 degrees and 60 degrees to the south, I • respectively. Projection of the nearest fault plane to the ground surface would place the fault line emergence about 250 feet to the north of the project site. The 7 feet of offset reported along the faults below the site is quite small from a geologic perspective. A larger fault located south of the site is reported to have an offset on the order of 1 mile. 19 - As mentioned above, an average of about 930 feet of overburden exists over the mined out 1 . area at the location of the project site. No lineaments or other surface features indicating surficial faulting were observed at the site during the site reconnaissance performed for that purpose or 1 ^ during the field exploration program for the foundation investigation. In addition to the above mentioned historical earthquake records, recent research has focussed on two source areas for very large earthquakes: (1) subduction zone earthquakes off the Washington coast with magnitudes estimated at 8.0 to 9.5, and (2) Seattle Fault earthquakes with magnitudes estimated at 7.5 or larger. Subduction zone earthquakes are generally located at depths of about 35 kilometers and at a distance of about 150 to 270 kilometers from the site. i _ The energy and magnitude of ground motion is generally attenuated (reduced) prior to reaching the Puget Sound area. The Seattle Fault which has been the focus of recent study is thought to consist of a series of four or more eat-west trending faults, which extend from the Kitsap Peninsula to the Cascade foothills. One of the results in this zone passes below the south end of 1 • . . - .Elliott Bay and extends east along the interstate 90 corridor. The fault is located about 10 A. ' kilometers below the ground surface and about 12 kilometers from the site. The potential impacts . .j .of large earthquakes generated in these source areas is discussed in the "Seismic Considerations" - section of this report. . - kti • I . G e o Engineers B - 3 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 • .'. • •r- !t. •-, 1 - ..1 1 •', •t• • . 1:• 1 ' k• 1�•' ,r • , i` /.)-.,a•1'. .r'• •' ♦ (, 0•• '' I • I • .\•.1. ..'1• .,• ,li ,� ly • ` _�.{' •' • •.•+`.J�.r. • r, S•'i" 1 _ ` ,I,.•. '.!' -. ie�t•+✓ !� ��,• / .' _ )' •/.,. •1 .Ira:" l i /`.. ;;-.,.11' ^'' ,•' �;+ 1 1 •t., F/.r... 11. \ .- .-, '.'♦ r ` :\' • 1, 1 ,. . 1 r, • • . • • •y / - r '+ 1 `I \' ! ;/� • 0 S i • '\ '! .� !. i. .i • ..,'(\ '.> 1: + '/r'...�.r ••• •\` S'• '/�' t .1:\• / ' I 1\' .j ` • 1 ' '/•' Y' Ali:. %.'�,': ` '� 1 • 1"‘ ` /..�•.' , .` /i ., •• t. `. ,I f• !•).'.•-`1 i .1 \"• ' . !. r i i �•.♦ + 1 •,t %,'•' ,\'F• ,-•. 1 ':)'.i,r 1 _ . . / 1. '♦ •'jam,•' :1 1 , •-: 1,..; j' :1 • •I: ( 1 ••i: : \ • • �:, '1 -, - , ' 1.. .t,1. I s '•1 2: \. ' . •• .. .• 1 / ♦. 1. \ ,/ 1'., i. ( ' , \,.!\• ._�;r �� ,`1' �It • • •, •' r•. 1 i' f _ _ ' .. .- +� � 1^,�.+.� �r..r:.-•--n�-•�.-: -�.•..'•,.. ".�.'�'- r :•—='�. `�'>!"-•---, µ::�':� � �iu.•/ww,� ►y""""'•1 ,T'�','�„� APPENDIX C SELECTED REFERENCES Atwater, B.F., 1987, "Evidence for Great Holocene Earthquakes Along the Outer Coast of Washington State," Science, Vol. 236, No. 4804, pp. 942-944. Atwater, B.F., and Moore, A.L., 1992, "A Tsunami about 1000 Years Ago in Puget Sound, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, pp. 1614-1617. Beian, H.M., 1961, Coal Reserves of Washington: State of Washington Department of Natural Resources - Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin No. 47, pp. 33-49. 1-4 Bucknam, R.C., Hemphill-Haley, E., and Leopold, E.B., 1992, "Abrupt Uplift Within the Past 1700 Years at Southern Puget Sound, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, - pp. 1611-1614. J Dunrud, C.R., 1984, Coal Mine Subsidence- Western United States: Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, Volume VI, 194 pages. ' Evans, G.W., 1912, The Coal Fields of King County, Washington Geological Society, Bulletin No. 3, pp. 110-114. Evans, G.W., 1920, Physical Report on the Renton Mine, with Recommendations. A consultants report prepared for Puget Sound Traction, Light and Power Company. pp. 2-5. Gower, H.D., Yount, J.C., Crosson, R.S., 1985, Seismotectonic Map of the Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Society Miscellaneous Investigation Series, Map I-1613. ]linen, S. and Hadley, D.M., 1987, "Seismic Hazard Maps for Puget Sound, Washington," . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American, Vol. 77, No. 4, August 1987. j . - Jacoby, G.C., Williams, P.L., and Buckley, B.M., 1992, "Tree Ring Correlation Between Prehistoric Landslides and Abrupt Tectonic Events in Seattle, Washington," Science, Vol.'258, pp. 1621-1623. • Johnson,-S.Y., Potter, C.J-. and Armentrout, J.M., 1994, "Origin and Evaluation of the Seattle Fault and Seattle Basin, Washington," Geology, Vol. 22, pp. 71-74. Karlin, R.E., and Abella, S., E.B., 1992, "Paleoearthquakes in the Puget Sound Region Recorded in. Sediments from Lake Washington, U.S.A.," Science, Vol. 258, 1 pp. 1617-1620. King County, December 1990, Sensitive Areas Map Folio. Livingston, V.E., 1971, Geology and Mineral Resources of King County: State of Washington Department of Natural Resources _ Division of Mineral and Geology, • Bulletin No. 63, pp. 67-68. . McCrumb, D.R., Galster, R.W., West, D.O., Crosson, R.S., Hannock, W.E., Ludwin, R.S. and Mann, L.V:, 1989, "Tectonics, Seismicity, and Engineering Seismology in Washington," Engineering Geology in Washington, Vol. 1, pp. 97-120. G e o E n g i n c e r s C - 1 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 I I Morrison/Knudsen Company, Inc., 1984, Engineering Investigation For the Renton, Washington Area: Office of Surface Mining. INosen, L.L., Qamar, A. and Thorsen, G.W., 1988, "Washington State Earthquake 1.... Hazard," Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Sciences Information I Circular 85. Schuster, R.L., Logan, R.L., and Pringle, P.T., 1992, "Prehistoric Rock Avalanches in r the OIympic Mountains, Washington," Science, Vol. 258, pp. 1620-1621. IWalsh, T.J., 1985, Inventory of Abandoned Coal Mines in the State of Washington: i . Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 84-6. Walsh, T.J., 1984, Geology and Coal Resources of Central King County, Washington: Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 84-3. Walsh, T.J., 1983, Map of Coal Mine Workings in Part of King County, Washington: Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 83-17. Warren, W.C., Norbisrath, H., Grivetti, R.M., and Brown, S.P., 1945, Preliminary Geologic Map and Brief Description of the Coal Fields of King County, Washington: United States Geological SurveyPreliminary Map, 1 sheet. Ft � i 1 I • • I . 1L. .• I I G e o E n g i n e e r s C - 2 File No.0693-044-02-1130/032296 Downstream Information CHAPTER 7 DOWNSTREAM STORMWATER SYSTEM This chapter evaluates the existing stormwater system downstream of the reservoir site, and presents potential impacts by the facilities during an overflow or drainage occurrence. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS The Rolling Hills site is located at the crest of two drainage basins, the Talbot Hill Drainage Basin to the southwest of flipsite, and the Tiffany Park Cascade Drainage Basin to the northeast. Because the site is located on the divide, water can be potentially routed into either basin. The Talbot Hill basin is designated as a critical basin due to drainage problems, therefore, drainage from the site should be directed to the northeast into the Tiffany Park Cascade Basin. This flow path consists of a series of ditches and culverts which ultimately discharge into the Cedar River, and is shown in Figure 7. The first 2500 feet of the drainage path away from the site has been divided into 15 separate sections, each section being defined as a change in maximum capacity of the flow system (such as a change in culvert size, grade or open ditch). Each section has been evaluated to determine the maximum capacity of the section without overtopping the ditches or surcharging manholes. The velocities in each section are also evaluated during the maximum flow rate of the limiting section. Figure 7 depicts the drainage system and Tables 7-1 and 7-2 present the flow rates and velocity evaluations. The evaluation is based on "as-built" records from the City, field, ground and invert elevation measurements, and applying the Manning equation to each of the 15 sections using the Manning "N" constant shown. Note that while performing the field investigation, the following concerns were identified: 1) A property owner adjacent to the catch basin upstream of Section 7 complained that it typically flooded after heavy rains, 2) Section 7 ties in directly to Section 8 without a manhole or catch basin. 3) The 60-inch culvert identified by Section 12 through 15 is up to one-half full of debris, as shown on Figure 7. 4) A manhole may exist and be paved over between Section 11 and 12 according to the "As-Built" records of this storm drain. This evaluation is based on all sections being clean, and also that the first through third sections be re-graded to a uniform slope as indicated on Figure 7, by the dashed line upstream of Section 4. 7-1 • fvug cG ?-'2E D S\ 4,0 R.EPori.7 1 TABLE 7-1 MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF EACH SECTION PERCENT SECTION CHANNEL MATERIAL MANNINGS DITCH SIZE DEPTH LENGTH I.E.Sn I.E.out SLOPE CAPACITY VELOCITY CAPACITY type type _----n SIDE inches inches feet ---feet feet ft/ft ---cfs fps REQUIRED 1,2,6 3 DITCH GRASS 0.050 1.2 30 20.0 393 445.9 443.0 0.74% 15.2 2.0 100► 4 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 107 443.0 441.3 1.55% 4.5 5.7 100% 5 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 16 16.0 97 440.6 439.0 1.65% 9.9 7.1 100% 6 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 133 439.0 436.9 1.59% 4.5 5.7 100% I 7 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 12 12.0 75 435.6 432.3 4.40% 7.5 9.6 100% 8 PIPE CONC 0.013 100 432.3 429.9 2.40% 5.5 7.1 100% 9 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 313 429.9 401.5 9.07% 10.8 13.7 100% 10 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 345 401.5 365.9 10.32% 11.5 14.6 100% 11 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 235 365.9 352.E 5.66% 8.5 10.8 100i 12 PIPE CONC 0.013 60 60.0 253 350.E 349.8 0.32% 147.0 7.5 100% 13 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 60.0 75 349.8 349.6 0.27% 135.0 6.9 100% I 14 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 60.0 60 60.0 322 349.6 348.6 0.31% 145.7 7.4 100t 15 PIPE CONC 0.013 48 348.6 348.5 0.21% 119.4 6.1 100% I 1 , TABLE 7-2 I FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF LIMITING SECTION (4.5 CFS) PERCENT SECTION CHANNEL MATERIAL MANNINGS DITCH SIZE DEPTH LENGTH I.E.in I.E.out SLOPE CAPACITY VELOCITY CAPACITY type type n SIDE inches inches feet feet feet ft/ft cfs fps REQUIRED 1,2,6 3 DITCH GRASS 0.050 1.2 30 10.2 393 445.9 443.0 0.74% 4.5 1.5 30% 4 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 107 443.0 441.3 1.554 4.5 5.7 100% I 5 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 16 8.6 97 440.6 439.0 1.65% 4.5 5.9 46% 6 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12.0 133 439.0 436.9 1.59% 4.5 5.7 100% 7 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 7.6 75 435.6 432.3 4.40% 4.5 8.7 61% I 8 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 12 9.2 100 432.3 429.9 2.40% 4.5 7.0 81% 9 PIPE CONC 0.013 6.1 313 429.9 401.5 9.07% 4.5 11.1 41% 10 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 5.9 345 401.5 365.9 10.32% 4.5 11.7 39% 11 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 12 7.0 235 365.9 352.6 5.66% 4.5 9.4 53% I 12 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 8.0 253 350.6 349.8 0.32% 4.5 2.9 3% 13 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 8.4 75 349.8 349.6 0.27% 4.5 2.7 3% 14 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 8.1 322 349.6 348.6 0.31% 4.5 2.9 3% I15 PIPE CONC 0.013 - 60 8.9 48 348.6 348.5 0.21% 4.5 2.5 4% I i I Based on this evaluation the sections which limit the capacity between the proposed facilities and the outfall to a large ditch along Royal Hills Drive SE are sections 4 and 6 with a capacity of 4.5 cfs. Note that the velocities in all sections are not excessive. Potential Impacts from the Site The future facilities could impact the stormwater system as a result of three types of events occurring: 1) increased runoff from increased impervious area, 2) overflow events resulting from a failure in the water system, and 3) draining the reservoirs. Increased runoff resulting from the development will be determined and detention facilities designed in the design phase. The "rational method" will be used for estimating peak runoff rates for a 10 year design storm and the cities stormwater criteria used for designing the detention facility. Overflow events could occur as a result of a control system failure that does not stop a booster pump when the reservoir is full. There are three booster pump stations which could cause this to happen: the North Talbot Hill Booster Pump Station, the Fred Nelsen Booster Pump Station, and the Tiffany Park Booster Pump Station. If such an event occurred the maintenance crew would be notified and the longest response time which would likely occur would be 4 hours. The maximum planned capacities of these pump stations are: Max Capacity North Talbot Hill 5700 gpm 12.7 cfs Tiffany Park 1050 Rpm 2.3 cfs Fred Nelsen 925 gpm 2.1 cfs Assuming that a five year storm event may occur simultaneously with the overflow event, an additional 1.7 cfs (conservatively estimated) would be required. Since the limiting capacity of the storm system is 4.5 cfs, overflow events resulting from Tiffany Park or Fred Nelsen would not cause flooding. A maximum overflow event from the North Talbot Hill Booster Pump Station could cause flooding down Royal Hill Drive SE. To prevent this from occurring, a redundant telemetry link between a float switch in the Rolling Hills reservoir and North Talbot Booster Pump Station is recommended. This control would independently shut down the North Talbot Booster Pump Station or activate a transfer valve that would eliminate the pump station discharge. This alternative is less expensive then modifying the downstream stormwater system to accommodate a 15 cfs flowrate. Further, the 12.7 cfs contribution from the pump station would only exist until the second reservoir is constructed on the site. The last event which could impact the stormwater system would result from draining the reservoir. Normally, the reservoirs would not be drained to the stormwater system. For routine maintenance, the reservoir would be drained into the Talbot Hill reservoir. However, if the water in the reservoir was found to be contaminated and required to be drained to the stormwater system then the reservoir would be drained through an orifice control at a maximum rate equal to the maximum allowed release rate. This rate would 7-3 equal the rate calculated for sizing the detention system. For emergency purposes the reservoir could be drained as rapidly as possible through a 16" drain which would discharge into the ditch at a maximum rate of 27 cfs. This rate would result in minor flooding along the southeast lane of Puget Drive SE and at the intersection of Puget Drive SE and Royal Hills Drive SE and cause a maximum flowrate down Royal Hills Drive SE of 22.5 cfs. The possibility of this event occurring is extremely low, however, and if it did occur it is unlikely to cause major damage. 7-4 DRII•C SC--- ---1- -`�•• `\ -.... - )ti1GCT .._•- `� �\ i, } CITY Of RENTON _'_ - -\� ROLLING HILLS 490 ZONE RESERVOIR ' -YI pIYrw a n,w PRE-DESIGN REPORT xCTal � . _xpww] STORMWATER ANALYSIS \� / FIGURE NO. 7 / / // / 0 , ".�],rG 0l.w lW Ial III r•,(D[. 0110/00•031.0 ^[MOlw[lME lunr lrol Inn) SonWVninl 'nIIt.l .D WC •W 7a1 at Yqn YCna• /i•• YqM MIS I.I 373 „ I]i I St 0 YlplCM 0/01 0033 vin lb 44, nn�.(pDyr r�W(xcna f unPK17 ,.( cocn /la rCO[ vl •}( snore r fn 44 i,exCnw,l1( 7. JX /// / O 0. t,,Z I i Sr J6TH ST. 02irki.0 o4:-.) Iffpnd 1p /4/ xDna ItWIN.1 l xCYw 7 ^xcuw 3 ... ,. / xcna• xcna f xcna I xcna} xcna f xcnw f // •fp ZI______L_/-_____Z •f0 / \ xcna II 440 Y lm ]Do w0 •00 foo fao 10 SC 16TH ST. \ 410 lYPWO•IP oICM p•O( }W- �00 .. ....f00 . . 01 1 IY r xClww Ip O .. .... •J0 i •OD \�\ MO 100 ] xCTOI II •,p 8t. W � .•/ MC xCTa PJ I100 .. J `_` \.../ / xcna Il ... •Op (} ,•-� pp -•��- O[Mf / xcna,• 170D IJ00 > �� / 370 / M n•( xcna 1f -r.---:-- ----....,-7,--___ 1___ i - _--/.' l ..... 330 lw I J00 I•W Iw0 ra0 IrW 1900 I900 7000 JIDD 7]00 ]]OD }•pp two ]r00 peI•Pwl•low PLOW ran[rla xWrw V WM.P((l