Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH - PUD (5/11/1976) //7//7 t L�� e_� iel-2i e/ f R6/0 . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. • 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, 1 ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A "PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT I ORDINANCE" .TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE "RENTON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" AS CHAPTER 27, TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE I N0. 11628 KNOWN AS THE "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON" REGULATING THE USES PERMITTED. I DESIGN, STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES j . FOR; THE VIOLATION THEREOF. THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO EREBY ORDAINAS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Title. ' There is hereby established and created a "Planned Unit Development Ordinance" to be hereinafter I nown and designated as the "Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance" nd may be cited as such. Hereinafter the Ordinance will be referred , o as "this Ordinance" and same shall •be and constitute Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of, Ordinance No. 1628 known s "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton". SECTION II: Purpose. it ,is the purpose of this .Ordinance , o encourage innovation and creativity in the development of new besidential, commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. the City of Renton contains substantial acreage appropriate for , esidential, commercial and industrial development. In order to ake optimum use of these areas, to create desirable neighborhoods or family and community life, to encourage employment opportunities nd a viable tax. om base that will be an asset to the cmunity, to take into account special conditions of topography and soil stability and to make maximum use of new, concepts and technology of land dievelopment 'and building construction, and to carry out the .objective Lid spirit of! the Renton Comprehensive Plan, it is the purpose . • .f this Ordinance to encourage new development not limited by the . .trict application of the City"s zoning and subdivision regulations. o promote the purpose of this Ordinance, this Ordinance will be -dministered under the special permit procedures' as detailed hereinbelow. j , _1_ I I I I I More sp4cifically., it is the purpose of this Ordinance to: • 1 1 A. 1 Encourage development' of a variety of housing types. B. Encourage the development of a viable economic base ' I I that enhances the image of the City. C. , Create and/or preserve usable open space for recreation and aesthetic enjoyment of residents and employees. D. Preserve as much as possible the natural characteristics of the land; including topography, native vegetation 1 and views. E. Avoid construction in hazardous areas. • P. Preserve and/or create wildlife habitat. • G. Encourage creativity in design. H. Provide for maximum efficiency in the layout of streets, 1 utility networks, and other public improvements. • I. Provide a guide for developers and city officials • who review and approve residential, commercial and industrial developments meeting the standards and purposes of this Ordinance. J. Encourage the development of uses that will be I compatible with adjacent existing and proposed uses and that will be beneficial to the community. K. Allow development of large tracts of property in phases over an extended period of time. • L. To encourage flexibility that will permit a more 1 creative approach to the development of land and will result in a more efficient,. aesthetic and desirable • I use of open area, while at the same time, maintaining substantially the same population density and area . • coverage permitted in.the zone in which the project ' is located. • 1, I -2- 1 1 1 II • • 11 II M. To encourage and permit flexibility in design, placement 11 of buildings, use of open spaces, circulation facilities, I r parking areas, and to best utilize the p g potential of I II sites characterized by special features of geography, �, I • topography, size or shape or proposed uses of land. I jl SECTION III: 'Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, 1 !I certain terms, phrases, words and their derivatives shall be construed as specifiediin this section. Words used in the singular include the • plural, and the plural the singular. The word "shall". is mandatory; il, the word "may" is permissive. II 1 1. Open Space . A parcel or parcels of land or an area of . ' water or a combination of land and water within the site designated for a Planned Unit Development, which are without structures or buildings j'I of any nature; whatsoever, and which shall include but not be limited to landscaped, areas, garden areas, lawns and other undeveloped areas. 2. Common Areas. A parcel or parcels of land or an area of water or a combination of land and water within the site designated 1 for a Planned) Unit Development and designed and intended for the use or enjoyment if residents and employees of a Planned Unit Development. 1 Common areas may contain such complementary structures and improvements • as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of re- ,i sidents and employees of the Planned Unit Development. . 3. Developer. A person, partnership or corporation who 1 proposes to develop or has developed a Planned Unit Development. I 4. Property Owners' •Association. An incorporated, nonprofit i •rganization operating under recorded land agreements through which I (a) each land: owner is automatically a member, (b) each land owner • is automatically subject to a charge for a proportionate share of I I the expenses for the organization's• activities, such as maintaining 1 1 common property, and (c) a charge, if unpaid, becomes a lien against the property 1of the land owner. 1 1 � I I _J_ 1 ! 1 I 1 1 i I I it 1 5. , Industrial Development. Any Planned Unit Development ' . esigned and intended primarily for industrial uses which shall include, 1 but is not limited to, office, warehouse and manufacturing uses. 6. Land Owner. The legal or beneficial owner or owners f all the land proposed to be included in a, Planned Unit Development; I contract purchaser or any other person having an enforceable proprietary ' 1 nterest in such land shall be deemed to be a land owner for the purpose 1 f this Ordinance.. f 7. 'Legal' Ownership: The proprietary interest of a land . wner as defined "above. 8. 'I "PlannedUnit Development. Any development approved nd developedlih accordance with the terms of this Ordinance, including ' . subdivisionlof such land. 1 9. 'Residential Development. Any Planned Unit Development esigned and intended primarily for residential use regardless of I , he type of building in Which such residence is located; i.e., convent- onal single family residences, town houses, duplexes, fourplexes, . • multi family structures, or apartments, but excluding mobile home parks. 10. 1 Commercial Development. Any Planned Unit Development designed for commercial purposes which shall include, but not limited o, offices, hotels, restaurants, boat moorages, and marinas; banks, iulti-family housing and similar uses. A commercial Planned. Unit Devel- . mpment shall permit the development of property for any purpose or ombination of purposes allowed under the existing zoning.. . 11. 1 Multiple PUD. A planned unit development wherein there ill result amix of several types of authorizee.'"land Uses or developments hich might be otherwise impermissible or an '''!accessory" use under he zoning then in existence with respect to each separate phase or parcel within :the Planned Unit Development area. I SECTION "IV: Administering Authority. 1. Official Agency. The Planning Commission is designated j -4- I I l ' ar the official agency of the City for the conduct of public hearings; and the Planning Department is responsible for the general administration a d coordination of this Ordinance. 2. Reviewing Agencies. The Planning Department, the Public W•rks Department, the Fire Department,and the Seattle-King County H-alth Department shall review each proposed Planned Unit Development. i 3. Approving Agency. The City Council, after recommendations b, the Planning Commission, the Planning Department, and the other a:encies detailed in the paragraph above shall be the final approving a•ency under the special permit procedure. SECTION V Compliance with Purpose of Ordinance. In addition I tp compliance with the purpose of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, any applicant for Planned Unit Development approval shall have i I t e burden of demonstrating that a development shall achieve public b nefit as a result of any deviation from underlying zoning regulations trough creation of open space or public facilities, conservation, provision of services or needed facilities or otherwise. SECTION VI: Planned Unit Development Superimposed. The granting of a special permit under the procedures detailed in this Ordinance shall superimpose the requirements of that specific approved P anned Unit Development on the underlying zone regulations as an ex- c ption thereto, only to the extent that the requirements of the Planned U it Development modifies or supersedes the regulations of the underlying z ne. i SECTION VIi. Where Permitted. Planned Unit Developments be permitted in any zone within the City, including all residential z nes, multi-family residential zones, business zones and industrial z nes; provided, however, only a residential Planned Unit Development s all be allowed within or contiguous to a single family residence zone. i -5 1 � I , SECTION VIII. Minimum Site Area. 1. I Undeveloped Land. A Planned Unit Development shall consist of at'! least four (4) acres of land exclusive of street right- of-way which may be required for widening existing or officially planned streets or roads on which the parcel of land abuts and exclusive of land under water. ea a r, ,r,r roe.,r,we-4.6 2. I Developed' Land. A Planned Unit Development shall consist of at least one (1) acre of land exclusive of street right-of-way which may be required for widening existing or officially planned street) or roads On which the parcel abuts, and exclusive of land under water, provided, all Ilexistingdwelling units and all other structures are de- • molished or removed from the site, or rehabilitated to conform to all • current City !codes and ordinances. Said demolition, removal or rehabi- litation may occur during the course of• the Planned Unit Development, upon the prior approval of the time table for said demolition, removal • or rehabilitation by the approving agency. SECTION IX: Standards and Criteria. . 1. Design Standards and Procedures. • I. A, Subdivision Requirements. A Planned Unit Development shall abide by the special permit procedures but are not limited to conduct of public hearings and recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval ',by the City Council. If land or structures within a proposed Planned Unit Development are to be sold to more than (1) 1 person, partnership, firm or corporation or are to include the dedication of land, then the proposed Planned Unit Development shall be subject to the short {or major subdivision proceedings in addition to the re- 1 • • quirements of this Ordinance. A Planned Unit Development shall be exempt from the specific design requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. 1 B. Zoning Requirements. .A Planted Unit Development shall be exempt from the minimum lot size and setbacks of the Zoning • -8- I ; • I • I , • I , Ordinance. The minimum lot size requirements of the residential zones shall serve as the criteria to determine Planned Unit Development den- sities when the Planned Unit Development is developed in a residential zone. 2. , Open Space Required. A. Open Space. Each Planned Unit Development shall i provide not less than thirty five (35%) percent of the net developable area for open space. In determining net developable area, the gross 1 area of the Planned Unit Development shall be considered, less right-of- way for streets for widening of abutting city streets and thoroughfares, less twenty (20%) of the gross area for additional streets and internal circulation in a dvelopment, plus one hundred fifty (150%) percent of substandard floor area to be demolished or removed as part of the proposed project. Open space may be designed to provide either active or passive recreation or to. provide a wildlife habitat. B. Residential Open Space. Usable open space in addition to parking and storage' space shall be provided for each dwelling unit in a PlannediUnit Development whose primary purposes are residential • purposes, asjollows: (1) For single family structures at ground level, I ' detached or attached, private open space contiguous to. the dwelling unit shall be at ground level and shall be equal to a minimum of twenty (20) percent: of the site covered by the dwelling unit. Such open space shall not belless than five hundred (500) square feet. (2) All other dwelling units shall be provided open space of not less than five (5) percent of the gross square footage' of the dwelling unit. Such open space shall not be less than one hundred (100) square! feet. /t f1/4n5 uoV(", ri/. fo (10 6 c, /.( J) C. Setback €gin R-1 Zones. Whenever a'Planned Unit fam /y Development shall abut or be contiguous to a developed zoned I i Y;�(i„�.I,. .i"S':l:'E.1i (Il. 's,•, .G7 k::t'! ').:'.y. t/ .•�ti: 'S [:_tis(riY'd..`.a•.5'.yb'y-"t'.F.rr.4.Vis::.c., !-^�i�w T I.' f.i.�:,1��1 Y�1. •:''a�F\'t i",:�'!-'!1���'���;i3•II i,+f.�e iT`1.." f • • 5, }+!''+... ,U t :,� i,r,s;6 ,I;. ; �dt�s•,'S: �l i; <tfb}. . ; Setback and Height''Limits tions�Adj ace t n to' R-1 Zones. Additionally, any residential structure within 100 feet j � I of a developed single .family zone shall be no more than two and one-half stories or 25 feet in height whichever is less, and I I I limited to a single family within that vertical height. • E I • • • • • • • I � -7a- } • III area, then any building or structure in the Planned Unit Development shall be setback at least twenty five (251) feet from the interface between the R-1 developed zone and the Planned Unit Development. Such twenty five foot setback shall be open space, and shall not be utilized for parking, ;streets,playgrounds or other intensive uses, but such twenty five foot setback shall be landscaped as hereinbelow described and maintained as a common area and open space. 3. . 'Residential 'Welling Unit Density. Dwelling unit density I � shall be no greater than allowed by the underlying zone except as modified for developed land as defined herein by Section 4.2408.1. In determining the dwelling unit density, the gross area of the Planned Unit Development shall be considered, less right-of-way for streets for widening of • abutting city streets and thoroughfares, less twenty (20%) percent of the 'gross Area for additional streets and internal circulation in I I a development, plus one hundred fifty (150%) percent of substandard floor area to be demolished or removed as part of the proposed project. (as defined in Section VIII. 2. hereinabove.) 4. ! Special Areas. A. Water. Planned Unit Developments which include any shoreline of natural lakes, rivers and other waterways shall be governed by the requirements of Section 9-1107 of the City Code entitled "Resi- dential Subdivision of First Class Shorelands". B. Steep Slope. Planned Unit Developments in areas exceeding ten (10) percent slope shall be subject to special review by the Planning Commission and the Public Works Department to assure stable building I li conditions, safe and convenient access, and minimum disruption of the natural physical features of the• land. The Public Works Department ay require the applicant to furnish .a report by a licensed engineer to evaluate the site. C. Geologic Hazard or Flooding. Development of areas on 1 or near sites where land slides or flooding have been known to occur or may reasonably be expected to occur shall be subject to Section -8- 'I j I 1 j 1 1 •-1108.18 of the City Code entitled "Plat Improvements and Development `tandards" I i 5. Landscaping of Common Open Space. 1 A. Installation. All common area and open space shall .e landscaped ;in accordance with the landscaping plan submitted by 1 i she applicant and approved by the City. Prior to the issuance of any 1 .uilding permit, the developer shall furnish a performance bond to •he City in an amount equal to a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) 1 1 percent of they cost of the installation of the approved landscaping, • hich shall be, planted within one (1) year of the date of final approval 1 f the Planned Unit Development, and the maintenance of such landscaping . 1 or a period olf three (3) years thereafter. A bond for providing main- . tenance of landscaping may be waived if a copy of a Maintenance Contract 1 for the landscaping through a reputable landscaping firm licensed to d business within the City of Renton is kept on file, for this three year period and the Contract is kept active, or an acceptable substitute • I is provided. IB. Maintenance. Landscaping shall be maintained by the Property Owners' Association or the owner or the agent or agents thereof and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. I 1 6. Deferred Improvements. No Final Plan shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Commission to the City Council until all i provements are constructed in a satisfactory manner and approved . . b the appropriate departments. _ Certain improvements may be deferred • as specified in Section 9-1108.21 of the City Code entitled "Plat Improvements and Development Standards." 7. Access. The Planned Unit Development shall have adequate . edestrian and: motor vehicle access commensurate with the location, size and densilty of the proposed development. Motor vehicle access shall not be unduly detrimental to adjacent areas and shall take into 1 -9- i 1 I I I . I 1 . I 1 1 1 11 1 consideration the anticipated traffic which the development may generate. 1 SECTION X: Preliminary Review 1. Who May Apply. Any owner or group of owners of contiguous; I, property acting jointly may submit an application for a Planned Unit Development. 2. Documentation Required with Application. An application for a Planned Unit Development shall include the following to be drawn on sheets twenty-two (22) inches by thirty-four (34) inches in size: 1 i ' I A. Vicinity Map. A vicinity map at a scale between one (1) inch representing four hundred (400) feet and one (1) inch representing ,one thousand (1,000) feet. The vicinity map shall show I, all adjacent subdivision, true north arrow, type of land use, zoning, �I streets, and !tract lines of acreage parcels with the names of owners of record. The map shall show the streets in the proposed Planned Unit Development and their relationship with existing and proposed streets in adjacent subdivisions or undivided properties. I B. Site Maps. A map or maps of the site drawn to a � I scale of not 'less than one (1) inch representing forty (40) feet showing the following proposals: (1) Names and dimensions of streets bounding or touching the !site. (2) Pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns. I (3) Buildings, including identification of types and number of, dwelling units in each or use of building. (4) Dimensions between buildings. (5) Off-street parking facilities. i (6) Areas to be landscaped. (7) Existing surface drainage system (8) Locations, dimensions, and area of common and i 1 private open ,space. (9) The information listed in Section 9-1106.2.I.(2) through 9-11016.2.I(11) of the City Code entitled "Tentative, Preliminary and Final Plat Requirements." H -10- I ' I ' i I 1 I (10) Any other pertinent information required to review the Planned Unit Development. , CI. Landscaping Plan. A landscaping plan at a scale 1 0 one (1) inch representing ten (10) feet or twenty (20) feet indicating p anting bed dimensions; north arrow; plant layout and identification p ant list; sizle and spacing of plants and irrigation. DII. Building Elevations. Elevation or perspective drawings to scale to illustrate the architectural character of structures. E. Written Information. In addition to the information n.ted above, the developer shall submit a written statement with i;he n-cessary illustrations providing the following information: (1), Program for development, including staging or t'ming of development. (2) Proposed ownership, pattern upon completion of d-velopment. I 1 (3) Basic content of restrictive covenants. I (4) Provisions to assure permanence and maintenance o common open 'space through Home Owners' Association formation, con- d.minum development or other means acceptable to the City. (5) Statement or tabulation of dwelling unit densities p oposed or number of anticipated employees. I (6) Statement describing the relationship of the . p oposed Planned Unit Development to the City's Comprehensive Plan. ' 1 3. Filing of Application. The application for preliminary • II a_proval of the Planned Unit Development shall be filed with the Planning D partment accompanied by a fee computed at One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) p-r acre, or alminimum of $200.00. For the purpose of the fee, a • f action of an acre shall be considered a whole acre. Any,fees required b the Sub-division Ordinance shall be paid at the time of the appli- c tion. In all other respects the processing of the, application and the submissionlof information for Preliminary Planned Unit Development ' shall be the same as that required by the Subdivision Ordinance, except -11- f I 1,1 that the time limitations of Sections 9-1106.2G and 9-1106.2H do not 11 pply. ,il 4. ; Informational Meetings. Prior to making application I I or preliminary approval, the developer shall meet with the reviewing 1' epartments to study and review the proposed Planned Unit Development. II The developer'Ishall prepare and submit to the Planning Department six (6) copies of an application with vicinity and site maps containing he information required in Section X 2. above, together with other ertinent information required' by the reviewing departments. The maps "I ay be reasonably accurate sketches. A fee of Fifty ($50.00) dollars l 1 hall be submitted with the application. III I 5. ,Preliminary Approval. Following the application, for relim;inary approval as detailed above, the Planning Department, and ' 11 Planning Commission shall review the application, and make' recommendations I hereon to the City Council: The City Council shall either.approve 1 .r disapprove the preliminary application. , . 6. Expiration of Unapproved Preliminary Plans. The preliminary .lans shall be approved within eight (8) months from the date of filing ' l .r the application shall be null and void. The Planning ,Commission ,, . I 1 ay grant one ,(1) extension of up to four (4) months upon proper appli- ation by the developer. To revitalize the plan, it shall be resubmitted) ' ,.s a new Preliminary Plan. In the event, however, the applicant is diligently pursuing other governmental approvals and permits, and pon proof for excuse for delay, either by the applicant or such govern- I ental organizations, an ,extension of time, of a period to be determined 1 y the Planning Department, may he granted, .not to exceed six (6) months. ,nly one such :extension shall be granted. 7. Expiration of 'Approved Preliminary Plans. • A. Small Planned Unit Developments. For Planned Unit Developments less than fifteen (15) acres in area, the developer shall , I -12- , I complete the ;approved Planned Unit Development within two (2) years from the dates of approval of the Preliminary Plans unless the City • I , Council designates a shorter time. Upon proper application by the Developer including a fifty ($50.00) dollar'fee, and for good reason, he Planning Commission may grant one (1) extension of not more than .ne (1) year:: The request for an extension of time shall include the easons why, the extension is needed, a revised time table for completion; -nd any other pertinent information the Planning Department or the •lanning Commission deems necessary. • B. Large, Planned Unit' Developments. For Planned Unit • Developments fifteen (15) acres in area or greater, the. developer may equest the Planning Commission to adopt a master' plan for the entire 'lanned Unit Development. The master plan shall consist of but is of limited to proposed uses, densities, common areas and open, space, • . andscaped areas, major circulationpatterns, 'phasing,' Ownership and estrictions. For the master plan to remain valid, the developer shall omplete eachlphase according to the time limitations established in above (Small Planned Unit Developments). Upon proper application y the developer including a fifty ($50.00) dollar fee, and for good reason, the Planning Commission may grant one (1) extension of not more than one (1) year. The request for an extension of time shall • nclude the reasons why the extension is needed, a revised time table • or completion, and any other ertinent information the PlanningDepart- ent pertinent or the Planning Commission deems necessary. • • 8. Abandonment of Incottipleted Project. Upon the abandonment f a particular project authorized under this Ordinance or. upon the xpiration of!the preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development hich has notlbeen completed, the authorization shall expire and the • and and the structures may be used only for a lawful purpose permissible lithin the zone in which the Planned Unit Development is located. 1 -13- • • 1 • , A. Abandonment Defined. Abandonment for the purpose I l p ' o this section shall mean the failure and neglect of the developer t diligently pursue the project and the improvements incidental thereto, 1 alter City approval for a period of six (6) months from the date of • s Oh approval whether preliminary or otherwise, unless the Planning 1 J C•mmission andiCity Council designate a different time period. B. Open Space arid Underlying Zone Requirements. In 11 t e event any structures, improvements or facilities have been cons-. i 1 ,I t ucted, or construction therefor has commenced, and completion therefor 1 d h s been abandoned as hereinabove defined, and the full plan is not 1 b ing implemented, then in any such case, the open space requirements 1 a setforth inISection IX 2, and as set forth in any approved "preliminary plan", shall be adhered to in connection with any further approved l ' development; furthermore, if all of such improvements and facilities I • a e completelylremoved, then the requirements of the applicable zone s all be controlling:' C. Occupation of Structure. Any finished structures o facilities,Ishort of full implementation Of the approved plan, may Qond/k0,, 1/ b- occupied upon the issuance of a cro,4a1 permit by the Plaui ing Wu1/dl.,J. .0-partole.. t l II r. =-, together with such conditions, covenants, or other terms II order to assure compliance with the requirements of Section 'IX. ' ' a d/or any other applicable provision of this ordinance and the City's z•ning code. I• � ' 9. Sale of Planned Unit Development. If a developer sells t e parcel or a portion of the parcel after preliminary approval, such s-le shall not prevent final approval of. the Planned Unit Development, 4.71 /,in Ct �4N4 ,5c•// aid-Crs ,.-, p oviding thatlany succeeding owner agrees,,to comply with the requirements 1 o this Ordinance, and any and all, conditions or covenants that have I ben establishedo , • 1 'uh appllualiuu bhall include a fifty (050.00) dollar fee. SECTION XI: Final Review 1 ' 1. Open Space. . An application for final approval may be 1 fled for any part or all of a Planned Unit Development area for which I 1 -14- I 1 I 1 , . , • , ; .t „ , , I • ; - • ' , , ; • 1 1 . , . ' I • I I " . 1 1 , 1 . . ,, .reliminary approval has been grantedv the City. Co , p uncilrovided I I -11 the !improVements have been ihsta led. A '11a.l,hplan for a pat , 1 I ' I 1 , , •I of a Planned Unit Developmeitt shall l roVide the.same prOportion. f, [ .. . 1. . I.pen space and: the same Overall dwel ing unit density as the overall, • 1 I 1 1 1 I ! .reliminary plan. If that portion d the Planned unit. Development 1 I dr which final approval is requeste does not provide such open space, 1 , ' t e developer Shall file in escrow a Warranty deed with a preliminary : 1 title. insurance policy in favor of t e City of Renton for such additional I . ' ' - ' . 1 • . I . , I , ! 1 . . 1-nd area adjaent and accessible to the site and'of sufficient Size' to provide the open space required to meet the standards ofSectIon. 1 • . i . . D 2 and the approved preliminary p an.1 In the event that the developer . 1 Unit •aoandona the remaining portions of t e Planned Developtent, , 1 HI e-crow agent shall deliver the warra ty deed to the City. • : ' d I ' 1 1 ; 2, Documentation Required.. A final Planned Unit Development ,ii I m=p shall be filed an in irl d show the same foration a. 1'd,data required.t1'; , • • di regular platslas provided in 'Section X . iogether with any pertain nt . 1 ! . T i formation deemed necessary by the planning Comm6iOn cr the Planning ' • , D-partmeht. Alsti), the application shall be accomp nied by such other ' . - -- documentation orlinformation and data not lending tself to ,graphc . 1 I ' " _ , 1 p esentation such as restrictive cov nants, incorp ration papers and !, b, laws- of Property Owners' Astociati hs,..dedicatio. s, of 'easements, • I I I . 0 . I,I rights-of-way,Iand other written idoc ments specifiCally required of t e particular Planned Unit DevelopM nt plus any4ertinent information , ! • ' ',' ' 1 1 d-emed necessary: by the Planning Comission Or 'thlanning DepartMeht. . 3. 'Filing of Application: The application for final aPproval oI the Planned Unit Development shall be fliled witiN the planning bePart- m-nt accompanied by a fee computed at fifty ($50.Q4 dollars per cre, , o a minimum of $200.00. ForI the purpose of. the fee, a fraction f . , . . I • a acre shall be considered a' whole acre. Any fee requiTed by! th . , • [ ' . , . S bdivision Ordinance shall .be paid at the time 1 ofI the applicatioh. , • . , I all other respects, the processing of the appliCati: onIfor. fine .I al.proval shall be the same as that required by. Seci7on 9t1l06.1,3 ofH 1 1 , . . . • . -Li 6 SUbdivision Ordinance except that the time limiations of Section I , 1 9 1106.3.P and! 9-1106.3.0. do not apply. 1 — t rl,' .: , i • . I . . 1 -15- . d .• . ' ' . . I . 1 . . 1 ! , , , .:" . . II ' , • II , . , , , , .., i , 1 1 . ., , . . . . .. 1 1 1 . . .. , ; -;,. . .,". •J . , I i I SECTION XII: Building Permits 1. !Building and other permits shall be issued for construction! ' I I in Planned Unit Development areas only in accordance with the preliminary lan and program elements of the preliminary plan as approved by ' the City Council. . . SECTION XIII: Minor and' Major Adjustments after Preliminary pproval. 1. ;Minor Adjustments. Minor adjustments may be made ' and approved by the Planning Department when a building permit is 'ssued. Minor adjustments are those changes Which may affect the recise dimensions of buildings and the location of buildings, but • I hich do not affect the basic character 'or arrangement of buildings, • he density of the development, or. the open space requirements. 2. Major Adjust"ments. Major adjustments are those which I ubstantially !change the basic design, density, or open space re- I uirements of the Planned Unit Development. When such change constitutes major adjustment, no building permit shall be issued without a i . review and approval by the Planning Commission of such adjustments. I • SECTION XIV: Relationship of This Ordinance "to Other Ordinances. Where provisions of this Ordinance are in conflict with provisions of the Zoning ordinance of the Subdivision Ordinance . tie requirements of this Ordinance shall prevail, except that the procedural requirements to be followed shall be those of the Special P-rmit Process'I. SECTION XV: • Exceptions. The Planning Commission may 1 r-commend to the City Council an exception from the requirements of t is Ordinance] when, in its opinion, uidue hardship may be created as a result of strict compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. 1 I, recommending any exception, the Planning Commission may prescribe conditions that it deems necessary to or desirable for the public 1 itterest. No exception shall be recommended unless the Planning C•mission finds: -16- � I I • i �I A. That there are special physical circumstances or l c.nditions affecting said property such that the strict application oflthe provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use or development of his land; B. That the exception is necessary to insure such property t e rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties under similar c rcumstances;! C. That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental t. the public welfare •or injurious to other property in the vicinity. 1 Application for any exception shall be submitted in writing b the applicant at the time the application for Preliminary Approval i- submitted to the Planning Department. The application shall state f ily all substantiating facts and evidence pertinent to the• request. SECTION XVI: Liability. 1. City Not Liable. This Ordinance shall not be construed 1 t. relieve Cr lessen the responsibility of any person owning, building, 1 a tering, or constructing any Planned Unit Development in the City f.r damages to anyone injured or damaged either in person or property bi any defect [therein; nor shall the City, or any agent thereof, be held as assuming such liability by reason of permit or inspection a thorized herein or a certificate of inspection issued by the City or any of its lagents. j SECTION XVII: Severability. 'If any part or portion of his Ordinance' is determined to be unconstitutional by a court of .ompetent juri'lsdiction,. such determination shall not affect the em.ainder of this Ordinance. ' SECTION XVIII: Penalty. It shall be unlawful for.any .erson, firm or corporation to construct, enlarge or change any land or Planned Unit Development in the City or cause or permit -J7- I i 1 the same to be done contrary to or in violation of any of the pro- isions of this Ordinance. Any person, firm or corporation violating 1 ny of the provisions of this Ordinance shall, upon conviction, ' e deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and each such person shall be deemed guilty Of a separate offense for each and every day off, portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued or permitted; and upon conviction , f any such violation such person shall be punishable by a fine , f not more than five hundred ($500.00) dollars, or by imprisonment or not more than ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprison- ent. SECTION XI'X: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be -ffective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. 1 j PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Delores A.Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of rharles J. Delaurenti, Mayor pproved as to form: I I 1 erard M. Shellan, City Attorney il Date of Publication: 1 I , I � i -18- 1 I 1 I i I � i. • 1 / , J v I Y . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A "PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE "RENTON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" AS I CHAPTER 27 , TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 1628 KNOWN AS THE "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON" REGULATING THE USES PERMITTED I DESIGN, STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIEiS FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. THE )CITY :CpuNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY O DAIN'AS FOLLOWS :' SECTION I : Title. There is hereby established and created . "Planned Unit Development Ordinance" to be hereinafter known an. designated, as the "Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance" and may be cited as such. Hereinafter the Ordinance will be referred to as "t is Ordinance" and same shall be and constitute Chapter II 27 , Titl IV (BuilAing Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton". SECTION II: Purpose. It is the purpose of this Ordin once to encourage innovation and creativity in the development of new resident3.alCity commercial and industrial areas in the of Renton. The City of Renton contains substantial acreage appropriate for I residential, commercial and industrial development. In order to make opt -mum use of these areas , to create desirable neighborhoods for family and community life, to encourage employment opportunities and a vi-ble tax base that will be an asset to the community, to take int. account special conditions of topography and soil stability and to m-ke maximum use of new concepts and technology of land development and building construction, and to carry out the objective and spir t of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, it is the purpose of this ordinance to encourage new development not limited by the strict a.plication of the City"s zoning and subdivision regulations. I To promote the purpose of this Ordinance, this Ordinance will be 1i administered under the special permit procedures as detailed her 'inbelow. -1- i 'I I' 1 More specifically, it is the purpose of this Ord.inancei, to: A. Encourage development of a variety of housing types. - B. Encourage the development of a viable economic bas that enhances the image of the City. C. Create and/or preserve usable open space for recreation and aesthetic enjoyment of residents and employees. D. Preserve as much as possible the natural character1stics of tle land, including topography, native vegetation and views. E. Avoid construction in hazardous areas. F. Preserve and/or create wildlife habitat. G. Encourage creativity in design. H. Provide for maximum efficiency in the layout of streets , utility networks , and other public improvements. I. Provide a guide for developers and city officials who review and approve residential, commercial and' industrial developments-meeting the standards and purposes of this Ordinance. J. Encourage the development of uses that will be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed' uses and that will be beneficial to the community. K. Allow development of large tracts of property in phases over an extended period of time. ' L. To encourage flexibility that will permit a more crea ive approach to 'the development of land and will result in a more efficient, aesthetic and desirabl - ' use of open area, while at the same time, maintaining substantially the same 'population density and area coverage permitted in the zone in which the project is located. -2- . M. To encourage and permit flexibility in design, plarment of buildings, use of open spaces, circulation facilities, parking areas, and to best utilize the potential of sites characterized by special features of geography, I topography, size or shape or proposed uses of land. 1 SECTION III: Definitions. For the purpose of this Or finance, certain terms , phrses, words and their derivatives shall be construed as speci 'led in this section. Words used in the singular includ7 the lural -nd the lJral the singular. The word "shall" mandatory;P � - P �; a is m n atory; the word "may" is permissive. 1. Open, Space A parcel or parcels of land or an are of water or a combination of land and water within the site designated for a Pl-nned Unit Development, which are without structures or 17ildings of any n-ture whatsoever, and which shall include but not be limited to lands.aped areas , garden areas , lawns and other undeveloped a eas.. 2. Common Areas. A parcel or parcels of land or an ar a of water or a combination of land and water within the site desi nated for a P1 nned Unit Development and designed and intended for the use or enjoyment of residents and employees of a Planned Unit Develo ment. Common a eas may contain such complementary structures and improvements as are n-cessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of re- sidents -nd employees of the Planned Unit Development. 3 . 'Developer. A person, partnership or corporation who proposes to develop or has developed a' Planned Unit Development. 4. Property Owners ' Association. An incorporated, nonprofit organization operating under recorded land agreements through which (a) each land owner is automatically a member, (b) each land own !r is automatically subject to a, charge for a proportionate share o the expenses\for the' organization' s activities, such as maintaining common property, and (c) a charge, if unpaid, becomes a lien against the property of the land owner. 7_ it .y s 5. Indus'trial Development. Any Planned Unit Development I designed and intended primarily for industrial uses which shall Include, but is not limited to, office, warehouse and manufacturing uses. 6. Land Owner. The legal . or beneficial owner or owners of all t e land r p oposed to be included in a Planned Unit Develo ment; a contrast purchaser or any other person having an enforceable p oprietary 1 interest in such land shall be deemed to be a land owner for the purpose of this ordinance. 7 . ' 'Legal Ownership. The proprietary interest of a, lan owner as defined above. 8 . Planned' Unit Development. Any development approv d I and deve oped in accordance with the terms of this Ordinance, including a subdiv 'sion of such land. 9. . Residential' Development. Any Planned Unit Development designed and intended primarily for residential use regardless o the type of family residences , in which such residence is located; i.e. , convent- ional si glesiden e c s , town houses , duplexes, fourplexes, multi f. ily struc tl PAny a Development or apartments , but excluding mobile hom ; parks. ' 10. Commercial' Development. Pl nned Unit Develo �ment designed for commercial purposes which shall include, but not limited to, offi es, hotels, restaurants, boat moorages, and marinas , barks, multi-f. ily housing and similar uses . A commercial Planned Unii Devel- opment s all permit the development of property for any purpose or combinat 'on of purposes allowed under the existing zoning. 11. Multiple PUD. A planned unit development wherein there Will result a mix of several types of authorized/land .ases or developments which mig t be othe wise impermissible or an 9acoessory" use un•er the zoning then in existence with respect to each separate phase or parcel within the Planned Unit Development area. I SECTION IiV: Administering Authority. 1. Official Agency. The Planning Commission is designated -4- I i 1 i 1 1 as the official agency of the City for the conduct of public hearings; and. the Planning Department is responsible for the general administration and coordination of this Ordinance. I ' 2. Reviewing "Agencies. The Planning Department, the Public Works Department, the Fire Department,and, the Seattle-King County I Health De 11 artment " shall review each proposed Planned Unit Development. 3 . Approving Agency. The City Council, after recommendations i by the Planning Commission, the Planning Department, and the other agencies detailed in the paragraph above shall be the final approving agency under the special permit procedure. I SECTION V ! Compliance with Purpose of Ordinance. In addition to compliance. with the purpose of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, any applicant 'for Planned Unit Development approval shall have the burden of demonstrating that a development shall achieve public benefit as a result ,of any deviation from underlying zoning regulations 1 through creation of .open space or public facilities, conservation, 1 provision of services or needed facilities or otherwise. SECTION VI : Planned Unit Development Superimposed. The granting of a special permit under the procedures detailed in this Ordinance shall superimpose the requirements of that specific appoved Planned Unit Development on the underlying zone regulations as anlex- ception thereto , only to the extent that the requirements of the Planned (Unit Development modifies or supersedes the regulations of the underlying zone. 1 SECTION VII . Where Permitted. Planned Unit Developments 1 I shall be permitted in any zone within the City, including all residential zones , multi-family ;residential zones , business zones and industrial zones ; provided, however, only a residential Planned Unit Development shall be allowed within or contiguous to a single family residence zone. ' I -5- . I 1 f y v ill • SECTION VIII Minimum Site Area. f 1. Undeveloped Land. A Planned Unit Development shal, consist of at least four (4) acres of land exclusive of street r�' ht- - Ig f of-way ich •may be required for widening existing or officially', planned :il streets or roads on which the parcel of land abuts and exclusive of ' II land under water. ' 2. Developed Land. A Planned Unit Development shall lonsist of at lest one (1) , acre of land exclusive ofstreet right-of- a"( ) rzg w which ma6 be required for widening existing or officially planne streets or roads on which the parcel abuts , and exclusive of land under water, provided all exist�'ng dwelling units and all other structures ar' de- molished orremoved from the site, or rehabilitated all bi i d to conform t a l current ity codes and ordinances. Said demolition, removal or r,' habi- litation may occur during the course of the Planned Unit Development, upon the prior approval of the time table for said demolition, removal or rehabilitation by the approving agency. SECTION TX: Standards 'and 'Criteria. 1. D•esign 'Standards and Procedures. ' A. Subdivision 'Requirements. A Planned Unit Development shall abide by the special permit procedures but are not limited to conduct •f public hearings and recommendation by the Planning Co ission and approval by the City Council. If land or structures within proposed Planned Unit Development are to be sold to more than (1 person, Partnership, firm or corporation or are to include the ddication of land, then the proposed Planned Unit Development shall be sub ect to the s ort or major subdivision proceedings in addition to the re- quiremen s of this Ordinance. A Planned Unit Development shall e exempt from the specific design requirements of the' Subdivision Ordinance. B. Zoning Requirements. A Planned Unit Development shall be exempt from the minimum lot size and setbacks of the Zoning -6- . j Ordinance. The minimum lot size requirements of the residential zones , shall serve as the criteria to determine Planned Unit Development den- 1 sities when the Planned Unit Development is developed in a residential zone. li 2. Open Space Required. A. Open Space. Each Planned Unit Development shall provide not less than thirty five (35%) percent of the net developable area for open space. In determining net developable area, the gross area of the Planned Unit Development shall be considered , less right-of- way for streets for widening of abutting city streets and thoroughfares , less twenty (20%) lof the gross area for additional streets and internal circulation in a dvelopment , plus one hundred fifty (150%) percent of substandard flooriarea to be demolished or removed as part of the i proposed project. Open space may be designed to provide either active or passive recreation or to provide a wildlife habitat. B. [Residential. Open Space. Usable open space in addition to parking and storage space shall be provided for each dwelling unit I in a Planned Unit Development whose primary purposes are residential purposes , as follows : (1) For single family structures at ground level, detache or attached, private open space contiguous to the dwelling unit sh 11 be at ground level and shall be equal. to a minimum of twenty I ' ( 20) percent of the site covered by the dwelling unit. Such open space shall no.t be less than five hundred ( 500) square feet. (2) All other dwelling units shall be provided open space of notiless than five ( 5) percent of the gross square footage of the dwelling unit. Such open space shall not be less than one hundred (100) square feet.' C. Setback from 'R-1 Zones. Whenever a Planned Unit Development shall abut or be contiguous to a developed R-1 zoned -7- i I i • ~ „7, „rye 1:r..'+7, :7 ,'r :yn..,:{...cwA'"` S, tr'rjj.��c -,:aM..,i-f.,.., ll.G;. „.i w�..�;y,i„m,:., ; LI, 4 .D',1,;:l%ti. ;7,:<t' .yS,,..?F:^r •S- 0 Z' .io'1 v;.. .�:ra , ..f `�l,.�, -i(*!:.`: I1 x`r` „ r+t,•.�; qi•; ..7, ..,•.,�:':i, ter ..{ .�'.�n `� we F• ::Y;, , '^S-�i: :� tin. 1�./' �4YR: . Y t. 1 f I '7�' J rl% F:. :F...{ j_ir 1 ;1 • i �'T' i•�l. } • I ".5 1� t!.-;,; - - C. Setback'*and Height Limitations Adjacent to I : ' R-1 Zones. . -Additionally, any residential structure within 100''. feet of a d veloped 's,ingle :family zone shall be no more than two and one-half stories or 25 .f,eet in height whichever is less, and : limited to a .sinle family .within that vertical height. • . • i. I I : i , . I: , 1 , • 1. 1 it 1 • • -7a, I 1 I area, then any building or structure in the Planned Unit Development shall be setback at least twenty five (251 ) feet from the interface between the R-1 developed zone and the Planned Unit Development. Such 1 twenty five foot setback shall be open space, and shall not be utilized for parking, streets,playgrounds or other intensive uses , but such 1 twenty five foot setback shall be landscaped as hereinbelow described and maintained as a common area and open space. 3 . Residential Dwelling Unit Density. Dwelling unit density 1 I shall be no greater than allowed by the underlying zone except as modified for developed land as defined herein by Section 4. 2408 .1. In determining the dwelling unit density, the gross area of the Planned Unit Development shall be considered, less right-of-way for streets for widening of abutting city streets and thoroughfares , less twenty ( 20%) percent 1 of the gross area for additional streets and internal circulation in a development, plus one hundred fifty (150%) percent of substandard floor area to be demolished or removed as part of the proposed project. (as defined in Section VIII. 2 . hereinabove. ) 1 . 4. Special Areas . I A. Water. Planned Unit Developments which include any shoreline of natural lakes , rivers and other waterways shall be governed by the requirements of Section 9-1107 of the City Code entitled "Resi- dential Subdivision of First Class Shorelands". B. Steep Slope. Planned Unit Developments in areas exceeding ten (10) percent slope shall be subject to special review by the 'Planning l Commission and the Public Works Department to assure stable building conditio s, safe and convenient access , and minimum disruption of the 7 natural physical features of the land. The Public Works Department may requ are the applicant to furnish a report by a licensed engirLeer al v uate to. e the ' e sit C. Geologic Hazard or- Flooding. Development of areas on or near sites where land slides or flooding have been known to occur or may reasonably be expected to occur shall be subject to Section -8- 1 iI 1 1 I - I 9-1108 .18 of the City Code entitled "Plat Improvements and Development I Standards" ! . 5. Landscaping of Common Open Space. A. Installation. All common area and open space shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscaping plan submitted by the applicant and approved by the City. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, th0 developer shall furnish a performance bond to 1 I the City 'n an amount equal to a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) percent of the cost' of the installation of the approved landscaping, which shafLl be planted within one (1) year of the date of final approval of the Planned Unit Development, and the maintenance of such landscaping for a period of three (3) years thereafter. A bond for providing main- I tenance o landscaping may be waived if a copy of a Maintenance Clontract for the landscaping' through a reputable landscaping firm licensed to do business within the City of Renton is kept on file, for this three year period and the contract is kept active, or an acceptable substitute is provid d. I B. Maintenance. Landscaping shall be maintained by 1 the Property Owners ! Association or the owner or the agent or agents I I thereof and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. 6. Deferred Improvements. No Final Plan shall be submitted for approval by the ; Planning Commission to the City Council until all improvements are constructed in a satisfactory manner and approved I by the appropriate departments. Certain improvements may be deferred as specified in Section 9-1108 . 21 of the City Code entitled "Plat Improvements and Development Standards." 1 1 7 . . Access. The Planned Unit Development shall have adequate pedestrian and motor vehicle. access commensurate with the location, size and density ofithe proposed development. Motor vehicle access shall not be unduly detrimental to adjacent areas and shall take into -9- . II, . consideration the anticipated traffic which the development may generate. I SECTIO'N X: Preliminary Review 1 I 1. Who May Apply. Any owner or group of owners of contiguous 1 property acting jointly may submit an application for a Planned Unit Development. 2. Documentation Required with Application. An application for a P1 nned Unit Development shall include the following to be drawn on sheets. twenty-two ( 22) inches by thirty-four ( 34) inches in size: A. ' Vicinity Map. A vicinity map at a scale between one (1) inch representing four hundred (400) feet and one (1) inch representing one thousand (1, 000) feet. The vicinity map shall show all adjacent subdivision, true north arrow, type of land use , zoning, streets , and tractllines of acreage parcels with the names of owners I of record. The map shall show the streets in the proposed Planned - Unit Development and their relationship with existing and proposed streets in adjacent subdivisions or undivided properties. B. Site 'Maps. A map or maps of the site drawn tola 1 scale of not less than one (1) inch representing forty (40) feet showing the following proposals: (1) Names and dimensions of streets bounding or touching the site. ' . ( 2) Pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns. ( 3) Buildings , including identification of tykes and number of dwelling units in each or use of building. (4) Dimensions between buildings. (5) Off-street parking facilities. (6) Areas to be landscaped. (7 ) Existing surface drainage system (8) Locations , dimensions , and area of common and private open space. ( 9) The information listed in Section 9-1106. 2.I. ( 2) through 6-1106. 2 .I(11) of the City Code entitled "Tentative, Preliminary and Fina Plat Requirements. " -10- 1 1 I (10) Any other pertinent information required to review the Planned Unit Development. C. Landscaping Plan. A landscaping plan at a scale of one (1) inch representing ten (10) feet or twenty ( 20) feet indicating planting bed dimensions ; north arrow; plant layout and identification plant list; size and spacing of plants and irrigation. D. Building Elevations. Elevation or perspective drawings 1 to scale o illustrate the architectural character of structures. E. Written Information. In addition to the information noted abo e, the developer shall submit a written statement with the necessary illustrations providing the following information: 1 (1) Program for development, including staging or 1 timing of development. ( 2) Proposed ownership pattern upon completion of development. . ( 3) Basic content of restrictive covenants. (4I) Provisions to assure permanence and maintenance f common open space; through Home Owners ' Association formation, con- : development or other means acceptable to the City. I (5') Statement or tabulation of dwelling unit densities proposed or number of anticipated employees. • I ( 6) Statement describing the relationship of thie proposed Planned Unit Development to the City' s Comprehensive Plan'. 3 . Filing of Application. The application for preliminary approval of the Planned Unit Development shall be filed with the Planning Department accompanied by a fee computed at One Hundred Dollars ($100 .00) per acre, or a minimum of $200 . 00. For the purpose of the fee, a fraction of an acre ;shall be considered a whole acre. Any fees required I 1 by the Sub-division Ordinance shall be paid at the time of the appli- 1 cation. In all other respects the processing of the application and the submission of information for Preliminary Planned Unit Development hall be the same as; that required by the Subdivision Ordinance, except I -11- 1 I 1 i I that the time limitations of Sections 9-1106. 2G and 9-1106 , 2H do not 1 apply. 1 4. Informational Meetings. Prior to making application for preliminary approval, the developer shall meet with the reviewing departments -to study and review the proposed Planned Unit Development. The developer shall prepare and submit to the Planning Department', six ( 6) copies of an application with vicinity and site maps containing 1 the information required in Section X 2 . above, together with other pertinent information required by the reviewing departments. The maps may be re sonably accurate sketches. A fee of Fifty ($50 . 00) dollars shall be Lubmitted with the application. 5. Preliminary Approval. Following the application for preliminary approval as detailed above, the Planning Department, and Planning Commission shall review the application, and make recommendations thereon t the CityllCouncil. The City Council shall either approve or disapp ove the preliminary application. 6 . °Expiration of Unapproved Preliminary Plans. The preliminary plans shall be approved within eight (8 ) months from the date of filing or the application shall be null and void. The Planning Commission may grant one (1) extension of up to four (4) months upon proper appli- cation by the developer. To revitalize the plan, it shall be resubmitted I as a new Preliminary Plan, In the event , however, the applicant is I diligentl pursuinglother governmental approvals and permits , and, upon proof for excuse for delay, either by the applicant or such govern- mental organizations , an extension of time , of a period to be determined by the Planning Department, may be granted , not to exceed six ( 6) months . Only one such extension shall be granted. 7 . Expiration of 'A roved Preliminary P PP Plans . A. Small Planned Unit Developments. For Planned Unit Developments less than fifteen (15) acres in area, the developer shall 1 -12- Il I I I I • complete the approved Planned Unit Development within two ( 2) years from the date of approval of the Preliminary Plans unless the City 1 Council designates' a shorter time. Upon proper application by the developer including a fifty ($50 . 00) dollar fee, and for good reason, the Planning Commission may grant one (1) extension of not more than one (1) year. The request for an extension of time shall include the reasons by the extension is needed, a revised time table for completion, 1 and any other pertinent information the Planning Department or the Planning Commission deems necessary. B. Large Planned Unit Developments . For Planned Unit Developments fifteen (15) acres in area or greater, the developer may request the Planning ,Commission to adopt a master plan for the entire Planned Unit Development. The master plan shall consist of but is not limited to proposed uses , densities , common areas and open space , landscaped areas , major circulation patterns , phasing, ownership and restrictions. For the master plan to remain valid, the developer Ishall complete each phase according to the time limitations established in I I' A above (Small Planned Unit Developments) . Upon proper application by the developer including a fifty ($50 . 00) dollar fee, and for good reason, the Planning Commission may grant one (1) extension of not more than one (1) year. The request for an extension of time shall include the reasons; why' the extension is needed, a revised time table for completion, and, any other pertinent information the Planning Depart- ment or the Planning Commission deems necessary. 8 . Abandonment of Incompleted Project. Upon the abandonment of a particular project authorized under this Ordinance or upon the expiratio of the preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development which has not been completed , the authorization shall expire and the land and the structures may be used only for a lawful purpose permissible within the zone in which the Planned Unit Development is located. -13- I i A. Abandonment Defined. Abandonment for the purpose of this s-ction shall mean the failure and neglect of the developer to diligently e g y p ursu I the project and the improvements incidental thereto, after City approval for a period of six (6) months from the date of such approval whether preliminary or otherwise, unless the Planning I , Commission and City ' Council designate a different time period. B. Open Space and Underlying Zone 'Requirements. In i the event any structures, improvements or facilities have been cons- tructed, or construction therefor has commenced, and completion therefor has been abandoned as hereinabove defined, and the full plan is not being imp emented, then in any such case, the open space requirements I as setforth in Section IX 2 , and as set forth in any approved "preliminary plan" , shall be adhered to in connection with any further approved development; furthermore , if all of such improvements and facilities are completely removed, then the requirements of the applicable zone shall be ontrolling. C. Occupation of Structure. Any finished structures I or facilities , short of full implementation of the approved plan, may Ibe occupied upon the issuance of a special permit by the Planning Commission, together, with such conditions , covenants or other terms in order o assure compliance with the requirements of Section IX , . nd/or an other applicable provision of this ordinance and the Cityts zoning code. 9. Sale of Planned Unit Development. If a developer sells the parcel or a portion of the parcel after preliminary approval, such ale shall not prevent final approval of, .the Planned Unit Development, roviding that any succeeding owner agrees to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance, and any and all conditions or covenants that have been established, upon proper application to the Planning Department, which application shall include a fifty ($50. 00) dollar fee. SECTION XI: ' Final Review 1. Open Space. An application for final approval may be iled for any part or all of a Planned Unit Development area for which -14- i I, I I r preliminary approval has been granted by the City Council, provided all the improvements have been installed. A final plan for a part of a Planned Unit Development shallprovide the same P proportion of open space and the same overall dwelling unit density as the overall preliminaplan. If that Y i portion of the Planned Unit Development 1 for which final approval is requested does not provide such open space, the developer shall file in escrow a warrantywith deed a preliminary title insurance policy in favor of the City of Renton for such additional land area adjacent and accessible to the site and of sufficient size 1 to provide the open space required to meet the standards of Section . IX 2 and the approved preliminary plan. In the event that the developer abandons the remaining portions of the Planned Unit Development, the escrow ag nt shall deliver the warranty deed to the City. 2 . Documentation Required. A final Planned Unit Development lap shall be filed and show the same information and data required of regular plats as provided in Section X together with any pertinent information deemed necessary by the Planning Commission or the Planning epartmen ■. Also, the application shall be accompanied by such other I ocumenta ion or information and data not lending itself to graphic I I resentat 'on such as restrictive covenants , incorporation papers and bylaws of Property Owners ' Associations , dedications of easements , rights-of- ay, and other written documents specifically required of he particular Planned Unit Development plus any pertinent information eemed necessary by 'the Planning Commission or the Planning Department. 3 . Filing of Application: The application for final approval of the Planned Unit Development shall be filed with the Planning Depart- ment accompanied by a fee computed at fifty ($50 . 00) dollars per acre, r a minim m of $200.. 00 . For the purpose of the fee , a fraction of n acre sh 11 be considered a whole acre. Any fee required by the ubdivision Ordinance shall be paid at the time of the application. In all other respects , the processing of the application for final I , approval shall be the same as that required by Section 9-1106. 3 of he Subdivision Ordinance except that the time limiations of Section :-1106 . 3 .F and 9-1106, 3 . 0. do not apply. -15- 'I .I - i 1 SECTION XII: - 'Building Permits 1. Building and other permits shall be issued for construction • in Planned Unit Development areas only in accordance with the preliminary 1 plan and program elements of the preliminary plan as approved by I the City Council. ' SECTION XIII : Minor and Major Adjustments after 'Preliminary Approval. 1. . Minor! Adjustments. Minor adjustments may be made and approved by the Planning Department when a building permit is issued. Minor adjustments are those changes which may affect the precise drmensions of buildings and the location of buildings , but which do not affect the basic character or arrangement of buildings, I I the density of the development, or the open space requirements. 2. Major Adjustments. Major adjustments are those which substantially change the basic design, density, or open space re- I' quirements of the Planned Unit Development. When such change constitutes a major adjustment, no building permit shall be issued without a review and approval 'by the Planning Commission of such adjustments. SECTION XIV: Relationship of This Ordinance to .Other Ordinances. Where provisions of this Ordinance are in conflict with provisions of the Zoning ordinance of the Subdivision Ordinance the requirements of thisOrdinance shall prevail, except that the procedural requirements to be followed shall be those of the Special Permit Process. SECTION 'XV: Exceptions. The Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council an exception from the requirements of this Ordinance when,; in its opinion, endue hardship may be created as a result of strict compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance . In recommending any exception, the Planning Commission may prescribe conditions that it deems necessary to or desirable for the public interest . No exception shall be recommended unless the Planning Commission finds : -16- I i " I A. That; there are special physical circumstances or I I conditions affecting said property such that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use or development of his land; B . That the exception is necessary to insure such property the righ=s and privileges enjoyed by other properties under similar circumstances ; C. That the, granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity. Application for any exception shall be submitted- in writing by the a plicant at the time the application for Preliminary Approval is submitted to the Planning Department . The application shall state fully all substantiating facts and evidence pertinent to the request . SECTION XVI : Liability. 1. City !Not Liable. This Ordinance shall not be construed to relieve 'or lessen the responsibility of any person owning, building, altering, or constructing any Planned Unit Development in the City for damages to anyone injured or damaged either in person or property by any defect therein; nor shall the City, or any agent thereof, be held as assuming such liability by reason of permit or inspection authorized herein or a certificate of inspection issued by the City 1 or any o , its agents . SECTION XVII: Severability. If any part or portion of this Ordinance is determined to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not .affect the remainder of this Ordinance. 1 I SECTION •XVIII : Penalty. It shall be unlawful for any. 1 I person, firm or corporation to construct, enlarge or change any land or Planned Unit Development in, the City or cause or permit ' I -17- 1 I I . I I 1 the same to be don contraryto or in violation of anyof thepr - I ' visions of this Ordinance. Any person, firm or corporation viol ting I any of t e provisions of this Ordinance shall, upon conviction,: be deeme guilty of , a misdemeanor, and each such person shall bell deemed g ilty of a separate offense for each and every day ob po; tion thereof uring which any violation of any of the provisions of t is Ordinanc is committed, continued or permitted; and upon conviction " I of any s ch violation such. .person . shall be punishable by a fine . of not m re than five hundred , ($500 . 00) dollars, or by imprisonment for not ore than ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imp, ison- ment. SECTION ''XI'X: ' . Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effectiv upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL this day of Delores A.Mead., City Clerk APPROVED, BY, THE MAYOR this day of '11 Tzar es De aurentI, 'ayor Approved as to form: erar. ' . e an, 1 y Attorney ' Date of Publication: • i it ,, -18- ;14 I r---Nr --"'Wil'T- --T ---Nr ........ ...... Q. • 0 CIPM 01 , � — I 14- � 12 e�,.:, . . in Bc Inn. __Nrei__ = VA1 rra t 76 t 1976 / (5\,,,:MIVA 1 SMINNIIMI OF. FIRST CLASS MAIL1 LAW OFFICES OF Oil' Ferguson & Burdell 1700 PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK BUILDING1 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98171 TO Mr. Delores Mead City Clerk 01° City of Renton Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 , t 1 — 1' ' ', ' (' '•'''l 1J i_1, ,fl, ,/. ' ,e - ' I i , 1 ' May 10 1976 i , 1 1 I I 1 , . Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council Because of a prior commitment, I will be 'unable to attend t ' the PubliC Hearing on the Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance / / and the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. -However, I have re- viewed the Ordinances in question and have the following comments for your consideration: I agree With the general concept of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance' 1 It appears to be well thought out and prepared. Thisl could proVide the impetus to encourage innovation and creativity in future developments. The City of Renton needs developers who are concerned with the ultimate benefit to the cOmmunity rather than their personal economic gains. Hopefully this Ordinance will encourage 11 this goal After reviewing the amendments to Chapter 7, of- Title IV, Ordinance #1628, I had to stop and ask why? Why has the time and effort been expended formulating the Planned Unit Development Ordinance whicn encourages the more efficient use of land when, these amendments will require a minimum land area of 4 acres and setbacks of 100' for churches which abut 'residential areas? What is the criteria that determined that churches are more detrimental to a residential area than other 1 uses such as businesses that are adjacent to residential ?ones? iHow d can a church be more injurious than service stations, parking lots,', tire repair shops and crematories which require far less setbacks? 11 , . Why churches? What specifically is detrimental to the surrounding 11 neighborhood? Not tbo long ago churches were considered to be al valuable liaddition to the community. What has changed? Are the churches no longervViable institutions? Should they be eliminated because you do I, not consider them an asset? I cannot find •any logical' reasons for these H • I restrictive amendments and I urge you to delete subsection 3, items (a) thru (g) of section 4-706 of the proposed amendments. Thank youlfor taking m,V1 comments into consideration and may God bless you for the time and effortIthat is spent working for the people of Renton. 1 i Since ,.,rely,,, , ,' /,',, 1 ! 11 1 1 Igi'\213/4/5 ' 0 , , e lir ^ ,4b . $ Michael L. Smith 1 4a aZk ' <A) r.6 3402 on-N.E. 7th Street ' 1 '`'' c.,\" ifa - V ' I II 6‘64g ' 1 1 1 II, I • I I 1 1 i I 1 I I 1 - I I I 1 I II 1 I � CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed Tuesday, the l l th day of May , 19 76 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : 1 . Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance relating to R-1 Residence Single Family, R-2 and R-3 Residence Districts, R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple Dwellings , and B-1 Business District, also as concerns parking and loading in the downtown area. 2. Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City,regulating the uses permitted, design, ' standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. Copies of above two ordinances available in the Records Division of the Renton City Clerk's Office. I I I Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION April 30, 1976 I � I � CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY I. RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 14th day of ,lime , 1976 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a II public hearing to consider the following : Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. II I Any and all interested persons are invited to be present I, to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . I I CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , City Clerk I, DATE OF PUBLICATION Juno 10, 1976 I. I /24 t i, (^ lay,eAiv.a al °-4 ' t ,. Affidavit of Publication M wwr or ,::��) • ;7 CP STATE OF WASHINGTON l COUNTY OF KING ss. �9�1Z�G�C �''' ". .30rr =?;{'':i On.r,1oE!cm being first duly sworn on e C.h3' f e oath,deposes and says that - is the �E`v• �•' Vic of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and • has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a.`0.V.g4 fl3 1C.G...! O.....j.QS.,. as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 0n.,0 consecutive issues,commencing on the 6 day of Aura 1:if.t ,19.76 ,and ending the day of 1 ,19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount` of the fee J. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of :},•`wd♦r `wvhich has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I' first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent . insertion. ) 41„...„ 1.),a,,, 1 QhN-e ` r rk III Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6 day of Augus t; , 1976 aja,rit_ --, .ezy . Notary Public in and for the State of Wa ngton, residing at Kent, Kin County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. I. • V.P.C.Form No.87 i ' 1 i - . i l . _ CITY OF w i ECTION III: Definitions. For I he purpose of this Ordinance, ( B�iesr°ential Open S aceRENTON,WASHINGTON Council, u on recommendation b PORDINANCE NO.3051 certain terms, phrases, words and R y Usable open space, in addition to e` u. B;Mlnte nanoLandsc• their derivatives shall be construed I the Planning Commission,the Plan- parking and storage space,shall be I shall be maintained bythe Proi y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Wing Department, and the other R as specified in this section. Words provided for each dwelling unit in a OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, used in the singular include theplur- i agencies detailed in theparagraph i Owners'nedoUni D y the own•�,or f ESTABLISHING AND CREAT- 9 9 Planned Unit Development whose the Planned Unit Developmen;;or al,and theplural and singular.The ;above shall be the Final approving primarypurposes are residential as e tN G A "PLAN N E,D .UNIT 9s:P P the agent or agents thereof and tall DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" word"shall"is mandatory;the word agency untler this.Ordinance. / follows: be subject to periodic inspectioli by • TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN "may"is permissive. SECTION V:Compliance with (1) For s i n g I e f a m i I y the City. '' 1: 1. Open Purpose of Ordinance.In addition structures at round level,detached • AND DESIGNATED AS THE pe Space. A parcel or 9 6: Deferred Im rovemal;its. arcelsoflandoranareaofwateror to compliance with the purpose of or attached,private open space con- Certain improvements ma;,,be ' "RENTON'PLANNED UNIT R I this Ordinance and the Corn- ti uous to the unit shall be DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" 1 a combination of land and water reh'ensive Plan, anyapplicant for g dwelling deferred as specified in Sectiqq`i 9- AS CHAPTER 27, TITLE I V .within the site designated for a 'P Pp at ground level and shall be equal to. ,1108.21 of the City Code en led Planned Unit Development .Planned Unit Development approval a minimum of twenty(20%)percent (BUILDING REGULATIONS) which '"Plat ant Standards." rds." ;',.n d ' ' .are without above 'shall have the burden of demonstrat- of the site covered by the dwelling Development ' ' OF ORDINANCE NO., 1628 i ground structures pmentStTheaPlan "ing that a development achieve unit. Such open space shall not be KNOWN AS THE "CODE OF 1R R 7. Access. The Planned late GENERAL ORDINANCES OF 1 or buildings o •rt nature whatsoev• I public benefit as a result of a devia- less than five hundred(500)square I, p g Y non from underlying zoningi,••pedestrianeelopment shall have adequate THE CITY OF RENTON"REG- ' er,and which shall include but not be y g reg- feet per unit. , I, and motor vePllcle ,ulations through creation of open 2 All other units U L A T I N G I THE USES limited to landscaped areas,garden . O dwelling I access commensurate with the dca PERMITTED DESIGN, areas,lawns and other undeveloped ;space or public facilities,conserve- shall be provided open space of not ., 't h e R I tion,provision of services or needed ° tion, size and to density o STANDARDS; PROCEDURES, areas. `;less than five footage of the dwelling the proposed development,!Motor;Ieuly facilities or otherwise. ross square of the • AND PRESCRIBING 2. Common Areas.A parcel or 9 qe detrimentalcle access shall not be u duly SECTION VI: Planned Unit unit. Such open space shall-not be PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLA- parcels of land or an area of water or Development Superimposed.The P p to adjacent area c and TION THEREOF. ' a combination of land and water Pless than one hundred(100)square shall take.into traffic whit ;',the final approval of a Planned Unit• feet. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE within the site designated for a Development, procedures anticipated ygen,whichjthe P C.Setback from R-1 Zones. CITY OF; RENTON , Planned Unit Development and idevelopment may generate. ;I s detailed In this Ordinance, shall Whenever a Planned Unit WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY designed and intendedfortheuseor jsuperimpose the requirements of Development shall abut or be con- ,SECTION X: IanPro edur,��,� for ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: enjoyment of residents and em- Approval,of Planned',I+knit SECTION I: Title. There is to ees of a Planned Unit I thatelop lentc onvthed Planned Unit tiguous to a developed R 1 zoned Developments. The approwtil;of a P Y Development the underlying area,then any,building or structure Planned Unit Development sir ill be hereby established and created a Development. Common areas may ,I zone regulations as an exception in the Planned Unit Development p i,. "Planned Unit Develo ment complementary 'thereto, only to the extent that the shall be setback at least,twenty five bythe CityCouncil;, Ll,pon P contain such com lementar Ordinance"to be hereinafter er known structures and improvements as are requirements of the Planned Unit (25')feet from the interface between recommendation by,dhe Pla Ming and designated as the "Renton necessary and appropriate for the Development modifies or heR-1 developed zone and the I Commission, and sha.j. be P I a n n e d •Unit Development' benefit and enjoyment of residents supersedes the regulations of the Planned Unit Development. Such '', processed,in accordance w,h the :Ordinance" and may cited as and employees of the Planned Unit underlying zone. twenty five foot setback shall be i; following procedures; • Isuch.Hereinafter the-Ordinance will `Development. S E C T I O'N V I I: Where open space,and shall not be utilized i'- ' 1•Who May'Apply.Arty alvner be referred to,as''the Ordinance" 0 3.Developer.Aperson,partner-. or group of,owners of con puous Pe P Permitted.r m i t t e d. Planned Unit for parking,streets,playgrounds or arid the same shall be and constitute ship, joint venture, or corporation Developments shall be permitted in other intensive uses,but such twen- property acting jointly may su mil an Chapter 27,Title IV (Building Reg- i }who proposes to develop or has any zone within the City,including all ty five foot setback shall be land- • application for a Planners')Unit ulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 I developed a Planned Unit residential zones, multi-family J scaped as hereinbelow described' 'SDevelopment. .r I known as "Code of General i Development, pursuant to this residential zones, business zones, and maintained as a common area 2. Documentation ion RequiredUt Ordinances of the City of Renton." Ordinance.• with Application. A Plarin,4t Unit SECTION II:Purpose. It is the and industrial zones; provided, and open space. 4. Property Owners'Assocla- Development shalt b f inid l 1 by a purpose of this Ordinance to • lion. An' ncor crated, non-profit however,onlyaresidentialPlanned D. Setback and Height preliminary plan filed y",4 the P P Unit Development shall be allowed Limitations Adjacent to Single encourage innovationand creativity ; organization formed or qualified within or conti uoustoasin single FamilyResidential Zones. AnyDeveloper with the"Planning in the development of new residents- 1 under the laws of the State of g g Department,which appiicatiat shall al,commercial•and industrial areas ; ly residence zone. structure within one hundred (100) be in such form as sh,:',11 be Washington, operating under SECTION VIII: Minimum Site feet of a developed single family in the City of Renton. The City of R 9 'prescribed by the'Plairtnihe recorded land agreements through Area zone shall be a single family 'Department and shell incliule the ng Renton. contains Substantial 9 which (a) each land owner is au- 1. Undeveloped Land. A residence of not more than twenty- acreage acreage appropriate for residential, tornaticall a member,(b)each land p y 'following: • commercial! andlindustrial Y Planned Unit Development to be ap- five feet(25')in height,and shall be .A. Vicinity Map. A,vicinity owner is automatically subject to a plied to roe not improvedlimited to a' development. In order to make property rtY with single family residence map drawn to an appropriai 7 scare P charge for a proportionate share of within that vertical het which shall show all'adjacea Bub optimum use] these areas, to permanent buildingstructures shall height. the expenses for the organization's consist of at least four 3. Residential DwellingUnit create desirable neighborhoods for (4)acres of divisions,,true north'arrow,,ype of familyand communit life, to activities,such as maintaining come land exclusive of street.right-of-way Density.Dwelling unit density shall 'existingland use, zonin I.,.• y Y g, ,treats, e n c o u r a gi e employment men areas and facilities, and (c)i which may be required for widening be no greater than allowed by the and tract lines of acreage earcels subh charge, if unpaid, becomes s existingofficially p underlying zone exceptwith the names of owners o'l•ecord. opportunities and'.a viable tax base or tanned,streets y 9 as modified liens against the'property of the land for developed-land as defined herein that will be an asset to the communi- or roads which the parcel of landThe map shall show.;the st';eta,in ty,to take into^account special con- owner. abuts and ex of land under • by Section VI11.2.In determining the the proposed Planed' i' Unit - .5.Industrial Development.Any dwellingunit density, g Development and their rela';onshlp ditions of topography'and soil stabili- water. the, ross area Planned Unit Development p Drve9 ^v rs- ,A Planned of the Planned Unit Development - ty and to make maximum use of new R- with existing and proposed a beets in concepts-and technology of land designed and intended primarily for D. el�e:Ti nt to be appl:ad to shall be considered, less right•of- adjacent subdivisions or ul'livided industrial uses which shall include,' wayfor streets for wideningof abut- 1' r development land building construe- ,repor./ improved e,tn permanent properties. lion, and to Carry-eel the objective but is not limited to, office,( — _ ting city streets and thoroughfares, B.Site Maps.AmapV rmaps w rehouse and manufacturing 1 'building structures shall corisist`of at -less twenty (20%) percent of the and spirit of the Renton Corn- I of the site.drawntoa scald o'rlotless prehensive Plan,it is the purpose of u es. least one(1)acre of land exclusive gross area for additional streets and p p 6. Land Owner. The legal or ,of street right-of-way which maybe internal circulation i n a than'oee(1)inch repthe f ig forty this Ordinance to encourage new 9 Y (40) feet,showing the f;';lowing development-not limited by the strict beneficial owner or owners of all the t requ:,ad for widening existing or development,plus one hundred fifty proposals:, I • ', • application of the City's zoning and, land proposed to be included in al officially planned streets or roads (150%)percent of substandard floor (1)Names and dirt'':nsions subdivision regulations.To promote Planned Unit Development;a con-I which the parcel abuts, and area to be demolished or removed of streets bounding'or ton„ling the the purpose f this Ordinance,this tract purchaser or any other person exclusive of land under water, 'aspart of the proposed project.(as P P Q P P P j site. Ordinance will beladministered having an enforceable proprietary' provided all existing dwelling units defined in Section VIII 2. (2)Pedestrian and ehicular under the spacial permit procedures interest in such land shall be I and all other structures are hereinabove.) circulation patterns. X " hi• as detailed hereinbelow. deemed to be a land owner'for the A demolished or removed from the 4.Special Areas. (3) Buildings,,,lit eluding More specifically, it is the purpose of this Ordinance. I site,or rehabilitated to conform to all A. Water. Planned Unit identification of types and ulnberof purpose of this Ordi ance to: ) ! 7. Legal Ownership. The 1 current*City codes and ordinances. Developments which include anyt i P �t dwelling units in each o ,ruse of A. Encourage development of a ' proprietary interest of a land owner . Said demolition, removal or shoreline of natural lakes,rivers and building. . 'varietylof houeing types. I as defined above. • ( rehabilitation may occur during the° other waterways shall be governed (4.) Dimensions°ji stwee,n 'B.Encourage the development ' • 8.Planned Unit Development. • . "'',7 of a viab a economic base that I A�ty development approved and course of t h e Planned Unit by the requirements of Section 9- buildings. , Develb ment, upon theprior .1107 of the City Code entitled (5) Off-street• Parkin develo ed in accordance with the ; p p I - 9 enhances the;image of the i p "'Residential Subdivision of First 1 facilities. enCity. `I g terms of this Ordinance,including a I' approval of the time table for said Class Shorelands and "shoreline ;m demolition,removal or rehabilitation (6)Areas to be Ian(,seeped. C.Create; and/or reserve subdivision of such land, which Master Program." (7) Existingurface P by the approving agency. 9 usablelopen space for recrea- development may occur at one time SECTION IX: Standards and B.Steep Slope.Planned Unit I drainage system. lion and aesthetic enjoyment or in phases. Developments in areas exceedin (8) Locations,'dirt ansiorts, hCriteria. P g ; of residents and employees. 9• Residential Development. ten 1 ° I I 1. Design Standards and ( 0%) percent slope shall be and area of,common a private D.Preserve as Much as possible Any Planned Unit Development subject Po Procedures. j ct to special review by the open space. the natural characteristics of designed end intended primarily for �, residential use re ardless of the i A. Subdivision R e- Planning Commission and the (9)The informatio,l listed in the I,a n d, including I g quirements. A Planned Unit Public Works Department to assure li Section 9-1106.21(2) tfi lough 9- j topography,native vegetation j type of building in which such'1 evelo Development-shall abide b the stable building conditions, 'safe and ' 1106.2.1(11),of the,City Cede enti- '• and'views. ' t residence is located; i.e., colven R y fled."Tentative, Prelim" a and • E.Avoid construction in hazard- ,tional single family residences,town special permit procedures.If land or convenient access, and minimum rY ous areas. • houses,duplexes,fourplexes,multi( structures within a proposed disruption of the natural physical Final plat,Requirements,_',i Planned Unit Developmentareto be features of the land. The Public (10)Any other'pe finent in- F.Preserve and/or create wildlife excfamludinglli mores,bile o par apartments,but'I sold to more than (1) Works Department mayrequire the formation,required to rd'i,iew the habitat. excluding mobile home parks. person, P 4 10.Commercial Develo ment. partnership, firm or corporation or applicant to furnish a report by a' Planned Unit Developmeft . • , G.Encourage creativity in P I are to include the dedication of land, licensed engineer to evaluate the I ' , C, Landscaping,Plan. A design. Any Planned Unit Development E site. ..landscaping plan at a sale of.one H. Provide for maximum efficien- designed for commercial purposes then the proposed Planned Unit p g cy in the layout of streets,utili- which shall include, but not be Development shall be subject to the C. Geologic Hazard or (1)inch representing ten jl))feet or limited to, offices, hotels, short or major subdivision Flooding.Development of areas on twenty (20) feet indicatjl,7;planting ty networks,and other public in addition to the re- or near sites where land slides or I bed dimensions;,north arrow;plant im network nt . restaurants, boat moorages, and proceedings p a of this Ordinance. A floodinghave been known to occur layout and identificati•on,plant list; I.Provide aguide for developers marinas, banks, multi-family hous- quirements psize-and•spacing'of po opts and ing and similar uses.A commercial Planned Unit Development shall be or may reasonably be expected to r and city officials who review irrigation. Planned Unit Development shall ( exempt from the specific design re- occur shall be subject to Section 9- I' and approve residential,cam.-� D. Building Ele rations. mercial and industrial permit the development of property quirements of the Subdivision, 1108.10 of trio City Code c9tilled • 1'Elevationorperspective 'rawingsto -for any purpose or combination of Ordinance. Continued on netts port. developments meeting the — ,scale to illustrate:the architectural purposes allowed under the underly- B.Zoning Requirements.A standards and purposes of this --- character of structures. ing zoning. Planned Unit Development shall be Continued flrom preceding page ,I,.,,,, Ordinance. � C X � E. Written lnfornh�tlon. In 11.Multiple PUD.A planned unit exempt from the minimum lot size '•P I a t I m J.Encourage the development of p r o v e m e n is and addition•to the i form, )on noted N development wherein there will and,setbacks of the Zoning. I n uses that will 'be compatible Development Standards." , r above,the developer sh I,submit a with existingand result a mix of several types of au- Ordinance.The minimum lot size re- , 5. Landscaping of Common adjacent P 9 written ions providing t the nee essary thorize.d land uses or developments I quirements of the residential zones proposed uses and that will be Open Space. I illustrations providing th„;following which might be otherwise im- shall serve as the criteria to beneficial to the community. A. Installation. All common 1 information: I permissible or an "accessory"use • , determine P I a n n e d Unit , K.Allow development of large I area and open space-shall be land- ( 1 ) P r o g r,,rim f o r roe under the zoning then in existence Development densities when the tracts of p p rty in phases .with respectto each separatephase t Planned Unit Development is scaped in accordance with the land- development; including,>,taging or over an extended period of , I ope a scaping plan submitted by the ap- ,_timing of development.'. '• , within the Planned Unit i develd in residential zone. time. or parcelplicant and approved by.the City. ' (2) Proposed Nnership ,Development,area. 2.Open Space Required. ,L. Encourage flexibility that will Prior to the issuance of any building 1 '. pattern upon comp:6tion,of permit a more creative SECTION IV: Administering A. Open Space. Each Authority. I Planned Unit Development shall permit,the developer shall furnish-a development. approach to the developmentperformance bond to the Cityin an (3) Basic.c o,1 t e n t of of land and will result in a more ! 1'. Official Agency. The Plan- provide not less than thirty five mount equal to a minimum of one 1i restrictive ovenants. ''Win Commission is designated as (3 5 /° percent o f the net q efficient, aesthetic and ` 9 g ) �'hundred_fifty(150%)percent of the i (4) Provisions'.o assure desirable use of open area, the official agency of the City for the developable area for ppen space, cost of the installation of the I I permanence and mair1"onance of ' while at the same time,,l conduct of public hearings;and the For"the purpose of this Ordinance approved landscaping, which shall maintainingatsubstantiallythe Planning Department is responsible a"net developable area"shall mean RRcommon open space thh,sigh Home for the general administration and the gross area of the Planned Unit be planted within one(1)year of the Owners'Association forri;;Alen,con- same population density and , date of final approval of the Planned dominum develo men'„or other area covera apermittedinthe -coordination of this Ordinance. 'Development less right-of-way for PP P g 2. Reviewing Agencies. The I streets for widening of abutting city Unit Development, and,the I means acceptable to the City. zone in which the project is Planning Department, the Public I I streets and thoroughfares, less . I maintenance of such landscaping (5) Statement q' tabulation Iocated. , Encourage and permit' r- Works Department, the Fire i 'twenty (20%) percent of the gross ' for a period of three (3) years - of dwelling unit densitie•i,proposed M. Department, and the Seattle-King. .area for additional streets and in- thereafter..A bond-for providing I or number of anticipated ,mployees. ' flexibility in design,placement. County Health Department shall i ternal circulation in a development, j maintenance of, landscaping , (6)Statement de 1cribingthe 'of buildings, use of open, 'review each proposed Planned Unit 'p plus one hundred fifty (150%) e through a reputable landscaping relationship of the _reposed • spaces, circulation-facilities, ;Development. - I percent of substandard floor area to `.firm licensed to do business within Planned Unit Develops''9nt to the parking areas, and to best; __ -1 be demolished or removed as part of the City of Renton is kept on file,for j City's Comprehensive f!'11n. ' utilize the potential of sites • the proposed project. this three year period and the con-i Ii 11 . characterized by special I , - Open space may be designed ,tract is kept active,oran'acceptable) I Ii features of geography, J to provide either active or passive L substitute is provided. - topography, size or shape or'f I recreation or to provide a wildlife '' 11 •ro.osed uses_af_land ! habitat. ____ -____ II I • I i ' - `-"'TFiling`of-pp,atton-'leap= =B.I:ae a �fann®d-Unit plication for prelimii;dry'approval of ff SECTION XIV Relationshcp'ov the Planned Unit De ielopment shall Developments. For Planned Unit This Ordinance to Other be filed with t i,6 Planning, Developments of fifteen(15)acres Ordinances. Where provisions of Department accomp inied by a base' in area or greater,-the Developer this Ordinance are in conflict with fee of$250.00,,plus i,20.00 per acre, may request the Planning Commis- provisions of the Zoning Ordinance with a maximum fe.i.of$1,000.00. lion to adopt a master plan for the , of the Subdivision Ordinance the re- . For the purpose of tl a fee,a fraction b entire Planned Unit Development. : quirements of this Ordinance,shall of an acre shall b;,considered a The master plan shall consist of,but prevail, except that the procedural whole acre.Any fee;required by the is not limited to,-proposed uses, requirements to be followed shall be densities,common areas and open those of the Special Permit Process. • Subdivision thie of ttheaP,.pe shall be paid space, landscaped,areas, major SECTION XV:Exceptions.,The at the erne the aplication.In all circulation patterns,phasing,owner- Planning Commission may _ other respects the f ocessi ss of the ship and restrictions.For the master recommend to the City Council an application and the submission of • plan to remain valid,the Developer information for Prel ninary,Planned exception from the requirements of Unit Development s' all be the same_ shall complete each phase accord- this Ordinance when,in its opinion, ing to to the time limitations unduehardShip may be created ase as that required bit'Ihe Subdivision established in A above (Small result of strict compliance with the Planned Unit Developments).Upon provisions of_this Ordinance. In limitti excep tha ttons of Sec Ins 9 910he time proper application by the Developer, recommending any exception, the !i miYaif 5.2G including a fifty($50.00)dollar fee, y Planning Commission may and 9-f 106.2H do bt apply. and for good reason,the Planning J prescribe conditions that it deems 4. intormatio, al Meetings. Commission may grant,one (1) S necessary to or desirable for the Prior to making'tpplication for extension of not more than one(1) ,' public interest No exception shall be preliminary approv; ,.the developer year.;Therequestforanextensionof •recommended unless the Planning shall meet with I Se reviewing time'shall include the reasons why '- Commission finds: departments to stur)and review the the extension is needed, a revised I, A. That there are special proposed P I...n n e d Unit time table for completion,and any I physical circumstances or con- Development. The developer shall other pertinent informatioh and ditions affecting said property such prepare and subm 'to the',Planning Planning Department or,the Plan- , that the strict application of the Department six(6 ;opies,of an ap- ning Commission deems necessary. provisions of this Ordinance would . plication with vicm:y and site maps 9, Abandonment,of Incom- P deprive the applicant of the containing the info rnatior4 required p I e t e d Project. Upon the reasonable use or development of • in Section X 2.ab{,.ie,together with. abandonment of a particular project 1 his land; other pertinent ink;oration required authorized under this Ordinance or B. That the'exception is by the reviewing t!:partments.The upon the expiration of the final necessary to insure such property maps may beres.'bnably,accurate approval of a Planned Unit the rights and privileges enjoyed by sketches. A fee I:.?,Fifty •($50.00) Development which has not been other properties under similar Dollars shall be Omitted with the completed, the authorization shall circumstances; application. +I 1. expire and the land,and the C. That the granting of the 5. Pr e I i m i a r y ,Plan. A i structures may be used only for a exception will not be detrimental to preliminary develconient plan shall lawful purpose'permissible within the public welfare or injurious to • be submitted 14 the;Planning the zone in which the Planned Unit other property in the vicinity. I I' Department and,i hall include the Development is located. Application for any exception general intent of',he development, A. Abandonment Defined.',' shall be submitted in writing by the • apportionment of land for buildings Abandonment for the purpose of this. applicant at the time the application , • .and land use a1i1'such other in-, section shall mean the failure and -for Preliminary Approval'is sub- _formation or doer.,entation which -neglect of the Developer to diligently mitted to the Planning Department. , the,Planning De,aliment shall re- pursue the project and the improve- The application shall state fully all quire.;The Plans ng Department ments incidental thereto,after final substantiating facts and evidence shall determine ti,at the plans corn- approval by the City Council for a pertinent to the request. ply with the deve:ipment,policies of period of six (6) months from the _SECTION XVI:Liability. the Renton Comprehensive Plan date of such approval unless the City ' 1. City Not Liable. This , and this Ordinan(:.i..The Renton City Council designates a different time Ordinance shall not be construed to Council, upon rC.sommendation of period. 'relieve or lessen the responsibility of the Planning CKItnmission, shall B. Open Space and Under- any person owning, building, alter, approve, mod y, or1 deny the lying Zone Requirements. In the •ing, or constructing any Planned Planned Unit !Development event any"structures,improvements Unit Development in the City for Preliminary Plan,j ' - or or facilities have been constructed, damages to anyone injured or 6. Final Plept The,Developer or construction therefor has corn- damaged either in person or proper- shall,within one l( )year approval me need, and completion therefor ty by any defect therein;nor shall the by the City Coun ,of the Preliminary ,has been abandoned as City,or any agent thereof,be held as assuming such liability by reason of • Plan, submit I, the Planning herein above defined, and the full or inspection authorized Department, a' t'al development plan is not being implemented,then permit showingt:i? ultimate design herein or a certificate of inspection plan 9 in any such case, the open space issued_by the City or any of its and specific,deti s of the proposed - requirements as set forth in Sec- Planned Unit Development or the tion IX and as set forth in any agents. appropriate phase or phases SECTION XVII:Severability.If aprirovecr�liminary plan," shall' an art or portion of this Ordinance thereof. The Ity Council, upon to`e:itr,J d. ,0rmecti0nwithany any P is determined to be unconstitutional . recommendatio';of the Planning ci ,her ap;�4pv,:?-� da•,:;l;,ifilsn,, byacourtofcompetentjurisdiction, Commission,s i'j1 appreve,modify, t ar;hern�are if all of such mprove- bsy ah determination shallt not affect or deny the Tina Ian.Upon applica- maple and ta7;'i;io;arc comp!eloiyj the remainder of this Ordinance. tion by the Dev toper,the Planning — Department ma'grant an extension removed,then the requirements of i SECTION XVIII:Penalty.It shall for a maximum f twelve(12)addi- the applicable zone shall be control- be unlawful for any person,firm or • d o n'a l m o n t, corporation to construct,enlarge or S. If the final ling. develo mentchange any land or Planned Unit p pi-1�Is not,filed within C.Occupation of Structure. in the City�or or such one'(1) year or,within the Any finished structures or facilities, Developmentlt the same to be done contrary causeor extended time ,period, if any, the short of full implementation of the to orf in violation of any of the Planned Unit U velopment shall approved plan, may be occupied become void. 1upc)n the issuance of a special provisions of this Ordinance. Any 7. Explratloa�of Unapproved permit by the Plarining Commission, person,firm or corporation violating Prelimina Pia s.Thepreliminary to ether-with such conditions, any of the provisions of this ' plans shall be F;proved within eight g Ordinance shall,upon conviction,be covenants or other terms in order to deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, (8)months from the date of filing'or assure compliance with the re- the application.'hall be null and void. and each such person shall he ' PP quirements of Section IX and/or any may . other applicable provision of this deemed guilty of a separate offense The PlanningCommission grant one(1)ex-fensioh of upto four for each and every day or portion Ordinance,and.the City's zoning (4)months upo t proper application I code. thereof during which any violation of by the Developer.To revitalize the 10. Sale of Planned Unit any of the provisions of this plant, it shall p resubmitted as'a Development.If a Developer sells Ordinance is committed,continued new Preliminar, Plan.In the event, the parcel or a portion of the parcel' or permitted;and upon conviction of ' however, the s:splicant is diligently after preliminary approval,such sale any such violation such person shall , pursuing othitr governmental shall not prevent finalapprovalofthe be punishable by a fine of not more approvals an uponthan five hundred($500.00)dollars, pIpermits, and Planned Unit Development,provid- ' proof for excut i for delay,either by ing that any succeeding owner or by imprisonment for not more than the applicant o,such governmental agrees to comply with the re ninety(90)days,or by both such fine of the periodriod <�edetermin do ytiore, •quirements of this Ordinance, and and imprisonment. of the toe determined by the any and all conditions or covenants SECTION XIX: Effective Date. , Planning not t tment, may be• that have been established, upon This Ordinance shall be effective granted, not to exceed six io) upon its passage,approval and five proper application to the Planning months. Only 3., such extension days after its publication. Department,which application'shall shall be grant Ion• include a fifty($50.00)dollar fee. PASSED BY THE CITY 8. ina y of, Approved ' SECTION XII: Building COUNCIL this 2nd day of August, APreliminary S F arts. Permits. , 1976. of Srrl,ill Planned Urrnt 1. Building and other permits 1 Delores A.Mead, �evelo�riten:t.,for Planned Unit shall be issued for construction in • " City Clerk Development! 'less than fifteen(15) ! Planned Unit Development areas APPROVED BY THE MAYOR acres in area the Developer shall complete the i -proved Planned Unit only in accordance with this 2nd day of August,1976.the, Charles anti, Development ,within two (2) years preliminary plan and program) elements of the preliminaryplan as Mayor Plansorn the date', S"the,v i y Ctho Final i Approved as'to form: unle"s"the.,City Council approved by the City Council. PP designates a Shorter time. Upon SECTION XIII:Minor and Major, -Gerard M.Shellan, Adjustments after Preliminary City Attorney I proper including th !ion by the of aloper j Published iii the Renton Record' $50. 0) for ,payment of a fifty Approval. 1. Minor Adjustments. Minor Chronicle on Aug.6,1976.R3919, i rea on, the d ki ningaC for good adjustments maybe made and reason, ,planning Commission 1 may grant o6(1)extension of not approved qy the Planning . more than one,,(1)year.The request Department when a building permit. for anextens''inoftimeshallinclude , is issued. Minor adjustments are the reasons.,4hy the extension is ' those changes which may affect needed, a ivised;time table for precise dimensions of buildings and completion,el'id anyi other pertinent the location of buildings,Out which i n f o r m a t i :n the Planning do not affect the basic character or i'Department is r, the Planning Com- arrangement of buildings,the densi- L-rnission dee is necessary. . ty of the development,or the open space requirements. 2. Major Adjustments. Major adjustments are those which sub- stantially change the basic design, density,or open space requirements of-the Planned Unit Development. • When such change constitutes a major adjustment,no building permit shall be issued without a review and approval by the Planning Commis- sioa_ef such adjustments. I, I I'i, 1 fah- R nton City Council 7/26/76 Page 7 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued .74 P anned Unit The Legislation Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance ' D velopment creating a Planned Unit Development Ordinance. (See earlier report. ) 0 dinance The ordinance regulates the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures , and prescribes penalties for the violation thereof. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL PLACE THE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Seymour-Thorpe requested her NO vote be recorded. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Zoning The Legislation Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance 0 dinance amending Chapter 7 of Title IV, Building Regulations of the City Code pertaining to zoning. Following reading of the ordingnace amending portions ;of the zoning code, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Mayor Delaurenti directed the City Clerk to furnish copies of these two ordinances to the Council and interested parties. E ecutive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. CARRIED. Council went into executive session at 10:50 p.m. and returned to the Council Chambers at 10:55 p.m. MOVED BY STREDICKE, ADJOURNMENT SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Delores A. Mead, City Crerk m OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 26, 1976 BID OPENING SURPLUS PROPERTY Two Lots Located at the N.W. Corner of Anacortes 1—, Avenue N.E. and N.E. 24th Street July 21 , 1976 Bidder Bid Price Kenneth W. Kinared $4,000.00 for both Parcels John R. Newell 231 Williams Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 Douglas A. Weston $4,150.00 Parcel A 21318 - 109th Ave. S.E. $4,150.00 Parcel B Kent, WA 98031 $8,300.00 Total 854-2132 Appraisal Price - $4,500.00 • EXPI11 1'a • WARRANT :DiSTRIBUT'ION 7/26/76 FUND fi . TOTAL WARRANTS • MACHINE, VOIDS NO.1/10247 - 10252 ', . ' • °V ' • • CURRENT FUND. • 1 l :, 'r $746907160 PARKS AND RECREATION .,FUND; .,: - 1110/t67102. ARTERIAL STREET FUND 4172, 1,46.96 $TREET. FUND $5,630,83 LIBRARY FUND . ' 43* 174111 DISASTER RELIEF FUND $111363e98 FEDERAL SHARED REVENUE 10136a2021QO STREET FORWARD THRUST 446018141 URBAN ARTERIAL FUWD •3,.0201162 1975 WATER b SEWER CONSTR 3E7019161 WATERWORKS WTILITlY FUND' $68,9B509 . AIRPORT FUN) A4* 157,07 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL $24+94210S FIREMEN PENSION • •9,08B463 TOTAL OF ' ALL WARRAMTO •457* lOBiS9 • WE, THE'.UND RSIGNEU MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL♦ .HAVING RECEIVED' DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION TWAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, 1)0 HEREBY APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 10253 THROUQH ND. 10463 IN THE AMOUNT 3F 9457a205e89 .THfS 26Ti DAY OF JULY 1976; COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN w • .• 0, • . ■ 6 ; MEMBER " . w w w w • �w RC. eV MEMBER . ■ ■ • w s • ■ w ' • , ._.h,„..h , f,„,,,f)-. ...4,..-- , `'affidavit of ',Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Ss. Barbara Campagna beingfirstdulyswornon she. chief clerk cath,deposes and says that is the of HE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) 1 times a week.That said newspaper is allegal newspaper and it is now and ,i,,, ,,;,, ;, ;,slt•SrHsz?,r; ,,s as been for more than six months priori to the date of publication referred ,,a5:..,1,.,a,••..., . 3":°'•^}�i'•'' ',:)y,d :r o• printed and published in the English language continually as a news- ';,ax,x4;„CIY;. t?.RENTQN,?.;;,,,,. 1, a er published four(4)times a week in Kent,KingCounty,Washington, '=' p'tt•gt:F P0,00p.t1 AR1.0'.:_. I' nd it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained t the aforesaid pliace of publication'of Isaid newspaper.That the Renton . ri <RENTON'C,ITYCOUNCIL:!,-" . ecord-Chronicle has been approved,asl a legal newspaper by order of the ti'-'.(:,N.9TiCt ;ISi;HERBi3.Y,.,'GIVEN. I1 uperior Court of the Count. in which it ispublished,to-wit,KingCounty, :'that'„Ihe ReritoniCity'•Councii�has. Y , sf iiii*.a t4th day:',of,Jtine i9.76,:.at;' , ;4:0,tkp:m in the,Cour cil Chambers•, ashiugton.That he annexedisallot;ice of Public ;o'f th;e'Renton''MunlcipslBiillding;,;= I. ';Renton;.Washtiijgtort as the time arrd • .`place fora ptitilic heaiingto consider.'. Hearing. heaoiiowing:•:` <.,.:' :-;;•,:-;,.'< I z;"Adoption"of,an`Or,dinance'°- r,;eytablishiiig;a it cr'eaffn,g'_a; as it,was published in regular issues(and `e;,Planned:.Unit'Development for ' of in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period i;.thea;City; regulating;,the;ue's., j permitted,-Ydesign,,standards,,` °:,procedures-,and:prescribing:'; '11 ' I ,penalties",for-th®,vlotat 90.0 reof . „f one consecutive issues,commencing on the l';,ir:!ktitesdevelopme,0:;0I w', �7 r residenti`al;.<,commercial:`anid:>in°;t;" 10 ,19 1 i_dustiial•:areas�in;the'Cit o j',;::- dayof June 6 and ending the =:Rentort:'>;f,: :a',r ''% ' `.,'. I `�,'-Any`and'•;all'interested7persons ;are;:invited to..be„preserttV.voice; 1, 1 approval,disapptovai oropiniol?s',on day of r 19 both dates sanie.';:;1, t: ;.•;;• T ,: , ;,.,. nclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- ° ;.,` ;,:`„'^ 3' ( Y ••,.,, C ITV'QF:RENTON Lcribers during ail of said period. That the full amount of the fee ;- :,, !-`pelore.`S:A Mead;`: 11.66 „,t, : ;'. ±'::''; ;`-: ity`Clerk ";;fir.,. harged for the f iregoing publication' is is the sum of $ which f?ublis}ted inllje;Renign,Record f id06.09.le.luii10,^197fi s 3822:= as been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the rtr,.',- „" irst insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent nsertion. 111 y 1 chief cle k ..__ 1 0 ,. I Subscribed and swot n to before me this day of June 19 76 < : 1 ( L) V, T G) Notary Pttlxilid in and for the State of Washington, _ I 'I ' 1 residing at Kent, King County. 1, I I - . -- Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 195S. 1111 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. g • 1 1 Renton• City Council , I� 6/14/76 Page 3 OLD BUSINES - Continued - Public Safety Committee Report that al l l bids be rom the , f Committee report recommended Fire PumpTruck Public Safety p Y um er truck � one 1976 model 1250 �fi re p , 1�� 5/20/76 Bids May 20, 1976 bid opening for Rejected be rejected and that new bids be solicited in the future, th two following bids having been received: ` Emergency.Apparatus Co� $68,750 i and Pierce .Fire Apparatus , Inc. $72,000. The report 'explain d that the Pierce vehicle meets bid •specifications and the other bid (Vanco) '�' does not meet delivery date. and provides for, aluminum rather than 'i, steel body as required, and that the Attorney has advised th t the I City Ic is] unable to waive requirements for -delivery time so as to accept ' the .Van, o bid (270 day specified by Vanco and bid calls for ' 20). , i, MOVED', BY McBETH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, .COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOM- p . MENDATION AND ALL BIDS BE REJECTED. Discussion ensued on fi ancing and . intent Ithat three vehicles would eventually be'.purchased.. CARRIED. Travel .Vou�-hers Finance and Personnel Committee member McBeth submitted committee El, ' report repared by Chairman Grant before leaving' for. vacation) stating ; i, • the committee is holding-up payment for out of state travel and I reviewing any expenses already .reimbursed: LaValley Council President Stredicke noted recent 'Board 'of Public Works meeting . Use Permit regarding use permit for Kennydale lots (LaValley). .: MOV.ED, B]I STREDICKE, III; Mt_ View Ave. - N. . .'SECONDEDBY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER. THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES i. JE i COMMITTEE. CARRIED. E Public Hearing Council President Stredic.ke•requested a list from the Administration 1 Notices of the posting places for notices of public hearing on the Planned Unit De,elopment hearings, noting many ,more calls received from the notices for tonights meeting than from previous posting. ' Systems MOVEDE BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THAT THE' SYSTEM DEVEL PMENT Ek Development CHARGE BE REFERRED. TO THE PUBLIC WORKS' AND TRANSPORTATION. CO. MITTEE_ • Charge FOR REVIEW AND REPORT .BACK. CARRIED: '. ,,, 11 All Terrain MOV.ED, BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH,- THE'LETTER 'FROM THE BOEING ' Vehicles . . COMPANY EMPLOYEE REGARDING USE OF TANK .AREA IN HIGHLANDS BEHIND. THE E T RCYCLE CLUB AREA,ALLTE RRAIN VENICL E AND MO O EMETER. FOR USE AS `E C BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. , j 1 4th of July . Mayor Delaurenti urged the Councilmen .to spread the news of theIEEE • Celebration 4th of iJuly celebration in Liberty ;Park .and announced the ringing I . of the bells nationwide celebrating 200 years -•of•the signing of the 41 . Declaration of Independence would be herein Renton on the morning of July 4, 1976 for all church, bells, ,sir.ens; etc. f"or. 76 seconds. ORDINANCES Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report Ordinance .#3037 recommending second and final readings' of an ordinance amending the E I • Green' `River Comprehensive Plan regarding the :Green River Valley, first reading Valley - Plan 6/7/75. Following reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, ' COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ; ROLL-CALL: ALL AYES. E'' MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3038 The Legislation Committee- report recommended "secon.d and final readings I'� Cedar River of an.!, drdinance amending the Comprehensive Plan and adopting the Master Plan Cedar iver Master Plan. Following reading, 'it was'.MOVED BY CLYMER, 1 1 SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL 'ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Er ALL AYE'S. . CARRIED. (First reading. Of ordinance 6/7/76) E. Ordinance #3039 The Legislation Committee report recommended second .and fin.] readings ' ii Amending Co ncil , of an, Ordinance amending Council Procedures to include the atter' of Procedures the Consent Agenda. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLY ER, SECONDED , EJJ Consent Agenda - BY BRACE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ.• RROLL CALL: ALL AYES. . 1 CARRIED. (First reading 6/7/76) Amends Ordinance #2406. El First Reading The .Lgislation Committee report recommended. first ..reading of an E,I • Appropriation ordinance appropriating and transferring .funds in amount of $60,000 i� from unanticipated revenue fund unto Utility' Fund Account (Peak h Shaving 'Plant at Talbot Hill reservoir). . Following reading. of the - I 1 ordin'larice it was MOVED BY CLYMER, .SECONDED.BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER ! , 1. THE OIR 'INANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. . 'f- ', • •-- ' it Renton City Council 6/14/76 Page 4 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued ' - '' • •• ' '}. ''*';�'. ,f' ;fit•..•,•!• ,, • First Reading The Legislation Committee report recommended, first readi,ng;,of_'an•', ' 'Repeals ordinance repealing the present 'city, ordinance.on.`�l i•censi ng• 'and__ 11 Ambulance ' regulating ambulance services (due' to •preempti�ng.by' state law) :'. ' ,. • 11 Ordinance Following reading, it.was• MOVEDiBY' CLYMER;' SECONDED BY, BRUCE, ;COUNCIL ,'''` , ill REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION. COMMITTEE. '.,CARRIED': ' •' ;I 'First Reading The Legislation Committee report recommended 'first• reading..of. 'an ' .I;} h. Ambulance • . ordinance proposing a .tax on ambulance'service•t',licensed by .the' state • ''• I} Services Tax . and doing business in Renton: (no.•fee' has' been set U •on inquiry, '. ,I City Attorney Shellan'explained that.,as .of• 1;/1/76 :sta:te.•regulations superseded city licensing'of-'ambulanceserv:ices _also:explaining upon :: : it inquiry, that payments to Shephard Ambulance:would: be, for city initia_ ted: ,',,.1, calls, that the city does. not•:underwri'te' pr•ivate.`.business.'::' Finance. .., •:••? ' Director, Gwen Marshall , explained 'to"�inquiries of. Counc.i•lmarStredicke; ' " ! that Shephard Ambulance Co. bills •the,city :for.' unpaid:,cal:ls,. 'approxi'- '- ; -I • mately ,$300 to $400 per month:, .and credits •the• ci ty'.for• an'flb'i l l s'. coi'-''. lected at a later date. .. `MOVED. BY ''CLYMER;r•SECONDED BY ::BRUCE•, , THIS ITEM : !' BE REFERRED BACK TO THE LEGISLATION •COMMITTEEARR•IED;•'.'MOVED' BY : CLYMER, SECONDED BY McBETH;' COUNCIt• REFERi:THIS•"ORDINANCEiTO THE PUBLIC : ," :. SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. - ., • , • ' Resolution 42044 The Legislation Committee report' recommended reading and adoption of a'• • :• , Matching Funds resolution transferring funds; .i•n''amount"of $4,171J::•from• A•irport.,.F.und : :': . for Airport' to Disaster Relief Fund. Following reading,.;.ist',;was VE MODABY,.'•.CL'YMER, . -•'•JJ •Flood Damage SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL .ADOPT ..RESOLUTION AS:READ.,, •; CARRIED. ' Resolution 42045 The Legislation Committee'report recommended" .readi ng.:and adoption ••of " •.. Urging . • a resolution supporting the Urban'Ar.teriarB.oa.rd �U' andrging.our..Legis- , .. j ,Legislature to lature to continue financing •thereof.'�.:Following;.readi•ng, it. was MOVED . : Continue UAB BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE; COUNCIL•''ADOPT RESOLUTION''AS READ:AND ' - . inancing . SAME BE FORWARDED TO THE LEGISLATORS CARRIED .' ' - 0 Resolution 42046 The Legislation Committee report recornrnended,reading and adoption of • Federal Aid a resolution authorizing the•Mayor. 'and. City Clerk:to sign' Federal 1:l ii Funding Aid Grant Funds including FAM.Funds,,:,Sec"tion''203' and.':S'ection .205 Funds ` and Section 230 Funds. for following,•,pr`ojec"ts:''; 'Pavement marking,.. • , 'I Monster Rd. RR Signalization, •Traff-i'c';Signa•ls NE: 44th,'l& Monroe NE, • Traffic' controller replacements' S :& SW"Grady.Way.-and:Shattuck :S Access - ' 1'r Road construction. Following reading•;: i t was MOVED: BY,.CLYMER, SECONDED'. -, Ti . • BY McBETH, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTIOWA'S 'READ. - .Upon,:T;deb'a,te,for the need• '•-• . ., ! for further signalization in the city," MOTION ;.CARRIED;;',Councilman ': A S tredi cke. requesting his NO 'vote• be -recorded: }. .,: 1 '1 Recess MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED. BY' STREDICKE;.' COUNCIL-RECESS': . CARRIED. 14 •Council recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:20 -p.m. Roll •Call : _ i'' Councilmenpresent as y 1 I,previous) shown ,�(STRED�ICKE' LYMER; BRUCE AND � I,� McBETH). ..;,, 'Utilities Public Works Director Gonnason and Deput Finance`..Director. Bennett _ y _ Rate Increase used wall chart to explain proposed' util'i�ty�;ra,te"inncrease, pres`.entati.on v•., '1 having been planned for Committee of th'e:.Whol'emee'tin.g of•June•' 8, which ' .`; H . was cancel led due to lack of quorum:':::Gonhason•'noted,,the: rate increase' .; of two years ago }vhen city' determined' two year' 'rev. ew:.,for' 'rate.. adjust �� ments, noting? increase- in operating costs.;of. 30%'-.in :tne pas.t:'.two years': r' ;• Gonnason explained proposed.•11%, reducti:on,-in; sewer ..tes:for. laundries due to evaporation (sewer rates basedc-On•water''consumpti on);.•'explained ' • 'I rate increase to be effective 7/1/76:: Sewer rates for single family residence would increase from the ,present rate. of. •$l . 50 toll .65; water '' i 1 rates for 3/4" meter would .increase"•frthe presents•$.1. 55 $2.00 , f per month. Councilman •Stredi-cke.;and C'ounci`lman ,Cl-ymer ',:inqu'ir,`.e'd: a•s to 'Mater of • ' .the cost of producing .wa'ter,: and:.were:aldvis:e'd'•;o`f'ahet;var.ious••+:p,r,i-ces Rate Increase the city 'pays for water:: Councilman `C;l+yme.r `:inquired as;•to.,whe:ther•:.' 'Tabled industrial users were paying .'actucosts ~asompared,rto`homewners. d MOVED BY STREDICKC, SECONDED '.BY:JCL•,Y.MER, COUNCIL<;TAB•LE;, THE'.`.UTIL'-ITIES '' ''• .. '"' � ' RATE INCREASES • C ASES UNTIL NEXT MONDAY''°NIGHMCARRIED:;"; a. ,3• ' • 1PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper.-'noti.trees'`;having.�:been''published. and ' • . " Planned Unit posted as required, Mayor Delaurenti opened:'the: pub'l*.hearing -•to : . . '1 Development consider the Planned Unit Development�`Ord i nan.ce wh.i oh",establishes and 1 Ordinance creates, also, regulating the• uses' perni;i:tted;;' des1g►i. "'s:tandards • i� R-nton City Council 6 14/76 Page 5 P BLIC HEARING - Continued ' P anned Unit procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the Development development of new residential , commercial and industrial area. in 0 dinance_ the city. Letter from Michael L. Smith, 3402 N.E. 7th St. , ag eed with the general concept of the Planned Unit Development, hopi g it would encourage innovation and creativity in future developments. T e letter request deletion of Subsection 3,. Ttems -(a) through (g) of Section 4-706 off proposed amendments, being restrictions for churches which require more stringent restrictions than for businesses . in the residential areas. Letter from Ferguson & Burdell , 1700 Peopl s Nat' l Bank Building, Seattle, •by William D. Stites representing the on Koll Company': a;nd Quendall Terminals re development of parcel of rea property on LakeiWashington as concerns the proposed ro osed PUD Ordinance . Wr. tten . comments were enclosed and previously distributed to Council embers. LL l� A dience Comm-nt • Don Kolls representing Port Quendall project noted that commen s had P D Ordinance been subriitted. Clarke Teegarden of the Renton Planning Commi .sion '!i submitted written suggestions for the proposed ordinance and el pressed II belief that minimum area for development be four acres; also as ing that tei- ,"net developable area" be. clarified. MOVED BY STRED' CKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY 1.1 4STREDICK1, SECONDED BY BRUCE, REFER THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND AMENDME1NTS TO. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 11 • II ArJOURNMENT MOVED BY.STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN, CARRIED. 41 Meeting,[ .djourned at 10:2-4 p.m. . III _j' ' / O�►_ _% De ores A. Meal , Cit Clerk • it 1.II ill • lI 11 Ili , it • `',1_ _ WARRANT DISTRIBUTION */16/T11 FUND TOTAL WARRANTS MACHINE VOIDS: NO.# 9662 # 9699 CURRENT FUND VOID#9794, $618.32 • 524,773.24 PARKS AND RECREAT2ON FUND 942,112i,iA ARTERIAL STREET FUND $23,fiA®3A STREET FUND •1i�RitiA1► I;!SIARY FUND •i.ASSIE0 STREET FORWARD THRUST 166,36I ,211 URBAN ARTERIAL FUND Si.So'BBILA ;9'l1 WATER i SEWER CONSTR •177d776441 WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND 81084$00.111 AMOR, FUND $1,728,911 EQUIPMENT RENTAL VOID#9794,$652.40 8 #9846,$s*412g2x22 $338.03 RvEl' ill* • FIREMEN PENSION 418,1150.010 $470,329.55 TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS Wei Ki WEJ TWE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OP RENYDN CITY COUNCIK4 MAVIN3 RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION TWAT - MERCWANDIS& AND/OR SERVICES WAVE SEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HERESY APPRDVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS ND, 970.0 THROUGH NO. 9952 IN THE AMOUNT $470,329.55 OF 1114444.1144120 tNIS t4TW DAY OF RUNE 1976, - • COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN a a '* r ."). : : w *MEMBER a • w ■ r MEMBER maim . * ewe mine irk?0(.4,%.v .(), A (%/Cif/ oi�• ljoYch!‘"J. = 770 Z I- q 13/6 1.1(//1 L. I .D.#291 REVENUE WARRANT NO.#R—I3 $22,529.53 CASH WARRANT NO.#C—I8 $22,529.53 I ! • May 10, 1976 Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council : Because of a prior commitment, I will be unable to attend the Public Hearing on the Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. However, I have re- ' viewed the Ordinances in question and have the following comments for your consideration: I agree with the general concept of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. It appears to be well thought out and prepared. This could provide the impetus to encourage innovation and creativity in future developments. The City of Renton needs developers who are concerned with the ultimate benefit to the community rather than their personal economic gains. Hopefully this Ordinance will encourage this goal . ' I After reviewing the amendments to Chapter 7 of Title IV, Ordinance #1628, I had to stop and ask why? Why has the time and effort beep expended formulating the Planned Unit Development Ordinance which encourages the more efficient use of land when these amendments will require a minimum land area of 4 acres and setbacks of 100' for ch rches which abut residential areas? What is the criteria that determine that churches are more detrimental to a residential area than other uses such asibusinesses that are adjacent to residential zones? How can a church be more injurious than service stations, parking lots, tire repair shops and crematories which require far less setbacks? Why churches? What specifically is detrimental to the surroundings 1 neighborhood? Not too long ago churches were considered to be a valuable addition to the community. What has changed? Are the churches no longer4<v4able institutions? Should they be eliminated because you do not consider them an asset? I cannot find any logical reasons for these restrictive amendments and I urge you to delete subsection 3, items; (a) thru (g) of section 4-706 of the proposed amendments. Thank you for taking my comments into consideration and may God bless you for the time and effort that is spent working for the people of Renton. Sincerely, 0\12 13/41,5 /71/646/ J csvo Michael L. Smith 3402 N.E. 7th Street �P � Qc= Renton . :, LAW OFFICES OF Fer juson 6 l3ui,dell n/./. WM.H FERGUSON E.P.SWAIN,JR. CHARLES 5I BURDELL(1973) 1700 PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK BUILDING OF COUNISEL WM.WES SELHOE FT DONALD ?Fri Qr.DAVIDSON A Seallle,Washinglon 98171 WILLIAM D.STITES ED WARD HILPERT,JR. BRUCE P BABBITT THOMAS J.GREENAN (206)622-1711 JAMES P Mg GOWAN HENRY W.DEAN JOHN M.NOODLEY WILLIAM B.MOORE CHRISTOPHER KANE C.DAVID SHEPPARD HENRY C.JAMESON W.J.THOMAS FERGUSON May 12 , 1976 SCOTT B�.OSBOR NE JAMES E.HU T ii) Ms. I elores Mead - Re: , Don Koll Company: Pore Quendall Project Dear Ms. Mead: . This firm represents Don Koll Company and Quendall , Terminals. Our clients are developing a parcel of real prop-rty on Luke Washington and are vitally interested in the proposed Planed Unit Development ordinance which is under consideration by the Renton' s City Council. We have received a copy of the latest draft of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance which will be the subject of a special City Council hearing scheduled for May 20 . In order to set forth our clients ' position concerning that proposed ordinance, I aMlenclosing herewith certain written comments relative to the latest draft of the Planned Unit Development ' brdipnce. I ask that you deposit the enclosure with the puolic 1 records of the. City of Renton and, further, transmit copies thereof to the individual Council members. Thank you for your help and assistance. Very truly yours , v FERGUSON & BURDELL 611X---- , I By: William D. Stites WDS/djh Enclosures cc: Rodger Fagerholm Don Norman Tim Strader 1 • 7 COMMENTS SUBMITTED BY DON KOLL COMPANY AND QUENDALL TERMINALS TO CITY OF RENTON'S PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (TENTH DRAFT) Date: May 11, 1976 The following are general comments to the proposed planned unit development ordinance to be considered by the Renton City Council on May 11, 1976. The following comments are submitted by Don Koll Company and Quendall Terminals and 11 are intended to be general in nature and are not exhaustive of other more specific comments which will be provided at a P later date: 1- Section II, Purpose: It is suggested that the first sentence of Section II should be amended to read as follows: "It is the purpose of this Ordinance to encourage innovation and creativity in the development of new residential, com- meIrcial and industrial areas in the City ofi Renton as comprehensive projects so as toitake advantage of the superior environ- ment which can result from large scale community planning. " 2.i Section II (J) and (L) : The stated purposes I ' of the Ordinance as set forth in subsections (J) and (L) 1 appear at first blush to be designed to maintain a status quo. First of all, the developments which are encouraged are those which will be compatable with adjacent existing 1 -1- • III and proposed uses and, as set forth in subsection (L) , 1 those which will maintain, "substantially the same popular tion density and area coverage permitted in the zone in which the project is located. " Further, it is noted that subsection (J) requires that the planned unit development be ne which is "beneficial to the community. " No definition is given which would lend specificity to the requirement. 3. Section III (1) , Open Space: The definition of open space provides that there are to be no "structures or buildings ofany nature whatsoever. " It is unclear whe- ther planters, sidewalks, permanent sprinkling systems and similar improvements are included within the definition of "structures,. ' 4. Section III (3) , Developer: it is recommended that the words "pursuant to the Renton Ordinance" be added to the existing definition of "developer. ". As now stated a i � I developer could be anyone who has developed a planned unit development. under any ordinance whether that ordinance was promulgated' by Renton or otherwise. 1 5. Section III (5) , Industrial Development: It is suggested that the word "office" be stricken from the definition of industrial development as an office develop- ment is more appropriately defined under subsection (10) , II -2- I I I . Commercial Development. In the alternative, the last line 11 , of subsection (5) could be deleted in its entirety and th following be inserted in lieu thereof: "But it is not limited to warehouse, manufacturing and related office uses. " 6. Section III (6) , Land Owner: It is uncertain as to whether a lessee is considered to be a "landowner" I ' under the present definition set forth in Subsection (6) . 1' I I, 7. Section III (8) , Planned Unit Development: It I � is suggested that the last line of this Subsection (8) be deleted and, the following be inserted in lieu thereof: . . a subdivision of such land, which development may occur at one time or in phases. " It is believed that the amended language will not clearly set forth the ability of a developer to submit a .parcel of it 1 to; the Ordinance where improvements to that property P prop- erty will not be constructed simultaneously. 8;. 1 Section IV(2) , Reviewing Agencies: It is recommended that other agencies such as the Renton traffic 1 and hydraulics departments, planning and similar agencies be II added to thejlist of "reviewing agencies" set forth in Subsection (2) . It may be helpful to also set forth the guidelines to be used by the reviewing agencies. II - 3- �I I � . 1 1 I 9,. ' Section V, Compliance with Purpose of Ordinance: I t is recommended that Section V be deleted in its entirety. t is believed that the requirement that a developer carry the burden of "demonstrating that a development shall achieve public benefit as a result of any deviation from underlining 1 . zoning regulations through creation of open space or public facilities, conservation, or provision of services or needed i .11 facilities Or otherwise" is much too heavy for the ordinary 1 developer tb !bear. This is true especially in light of the I lack of any legal criteria by which the demonstration of public benefit can be shown to have been carried. Further, it allows an :individual citizen to bring an action in the ' event that such citizen believes that the developer has n t 1' in fact achieved a "public benefit. " It would appear that the public interest is adequately safeguarded by the norm 1 . hearing and comment process (including any environmental reviews attendant to a planned unit development) without I gLving to each member' of the public an independent and ij gyp' individual right to commence suit to adjudicate the require- ment of "public benefit. " 1' 10.11 Section VII, Where Permitted: The require it - ; ment that a residential planned unit development be allowed only withinlor contiguous to a "single family residence 11 I -4- 1I I zone" is understandable. However, it is unclear as to hether this Section would prohibit the obtaining of a residential planned unit development in conjunction with . other uses under the definition of a multiple planned unit 1 developznent.I This concern is very real to Don Koll Company I and Port Quendall, as well- as to other developers, because I III of the definition of 'residential development as set forth in 1 Section II419) . It:should be noted that a residential 1 development„ rather than being limited to single family residences, Includes "any planned unit development designed • and intended primarily for residential use regardless of the 1 type of building in which such residence is located. " A ,i high rise aplartment or a condominium development in con- p I junction withha •commercial PUD pursuant to the multiple PUD ' I usage could be effectively prohibited under Section VII. It is suggested that. a more definitive restriction be included in said Section VII. For example, it could be stated that ', only a residential planned unit development shall be allowed within or contiguous to a single family residence zone where ' 1 the residentIiial usage is the "primary" use under the pla ned 1 unit development. In the alternative, it could be state d I that except for a multiple planned unit development, a jj 1 , residential planned .unit development would be allowed only 1 1 -5- 1 11 1 within' or contiguous to a ' single family residence zone. 1 , • ' 11. Section VIII'(1) , 'Undeveloped Land: It is I Li recommended hat. the exclusion of "land under water" in 11''' 11 determining. the four acres for an undeveloped parcel ' of property be deleted. Land -under water must be included rl' under Sectio III (1) and (2) in determining open spance a d I '' ommon areals. Also,. there is some uncertainty as to exac ' ly hat Subsections . (1) and (2) of Section VIII ' are intended to11 j ', accomplish.1 ICI, 12. Section VIII,(2) Developed Land:_ Again, it is l�lil 1 ecommended' that the exclusion of "land under water" be ,l 1,11 l l eleted. Further, it 'should be noted that both Subsections I (1) and (2) of Section VIII relate to the minimum site aria 11 1 for planned unit developments. It is uncertain as to whe her .. I the Subsections on undeveloped land or 'developed land are to• II be read together so as to require a minimum of five acres , 1 . 11 • (one of 'whi;ch is to be undeveloped land and four' of which 'must 1 be developed land) or whether, for example, the first two lines of subsection (2) should 'be amended to read as follows: ;1 "A planned unit development covering property which is improved shall consist oflat. least one (1) acre of land on which ' buildings or other improvements exist, 1 1 1 it exclusive of street ' -6- ' 1 - p, • 1 1 1 13 Section IX (1) (a) ,. Subdivision Requirements: It is recommended that the first sentence be amended to read ;1 as follows: 1 "A developer making application for a planned unit development shall abide by the special permit procedures..which include, but are not limited to, the conduct of public hearings and recommendations by the planning commission and approval by the city council as set forth herein. " 14. Section X(2) (a) , Open Space: A definition should be provided for the word "substandard floor area. " 1 t present, the formula for determining "net developable area" includes a factor of "1500 of substandard floor areail to be demolished or removed as part of the proposed project. " Nowhere is a definition of what constitutes "substandard floor area"; found in the proposed Ordinance. 15. Section IX (2) (b) , Residential Open Space: It 11 is recommended that the first four lines of subsection (b) be rewrittenito remove an ambiguity found therein. It is I suggested that those: lines be amended to read as follows: :I 1 1' par "Usable open space in addition to king and storage space shall be pro- 111 vided for each dwelling unit in a planned I', unit development, the primary purpose of which planned unit development is residen- tial purposes, as follows: . . . " 16; Section IX (3) , Residential Dwelling Unit 1 11 , L -7- I • / I 1 I Density: reference There is a to Section tion 4. 2408. 1 in the ;I Third lineo, this Subsection. It is noted, further, that I, he last line of subsection (3) references Section VIII (2) . II il t is recommended that consistency in numbering of the . Ordinance be obtained to reduce any ambiguity or misinter- retation. Further, the formula set forth in subsection (3) again references"substandard floor area. " A definition should be provided for the words "substandard floor area. " 17. Section IX (4) (a) , Water: It is noted that j, ny planned unit development which includes "any shorelin- II of natural lakes, rivers, and other waterways shall be governed by the requirements of Section 9-1107 of the City Code entitled 'Residential Subdivision of First Class horelines. " A readingof Section o 9-1107 107 reveals that certain statements and information are P required pursuant to 11 I�I q hat Section of the subdivision code. It is, therefore, 11 ecommended of that Subsection (A) of the Ordinance be 71 rewritten to read as follows: l •"4. Special Area. (a) Water.. The developer of a planned unit development'which includes ii alny shoreline of natural lakes, rivers, and other waterways shall provide the I ilnformation required pursuant to Section 9-1107 of the City Code entitled, II 'Residential Subdivision of First Class Shorelines. '" -8- • 1 • Ili' IIII in the alternative, this Subsection should be specifically III 111 elated to he' development of Only residential planned unit 111, 1,11 11 evelopment . Section .9-1107 of the residential subdivi ion . III11 code has little or no relationship 'to a commercial or I I. i P industrial develo ment. .which 'will `have' theirown efficie t 1 P uses of shorelines, rivers and other natural waterways. „I 11 . 18. Section IX(5) (a) , Installation: It is ur•ed ' that this Subsection be completed deleted and rewritten . s . Id follows: . J ' I . "a. Installation. With respect to Illil ech phase of a planned unit development, a11 d with respect. to the .entire project if that project is not developed in phases, ', ail common open space shall be landscaped II, ink J accordance with. the landscaping plans I'I submitted by the applicant and approved by 1'I the City Council. Prior to the issuance of anbuildingpermit, the developer shall Y P furnish a performance bond in an amount equal to a maximum of 150%. of ��the cost of • both the installation of the approved land- sclaping• and' maintenance of such landscaping I fi three ' (3) years after its 11'I inor a period ofstallation. The installation of said ' landscaping shall be commenced and accom- pllished pursuant to the planned unit development approved by the City Council. " asically, two changes are accomplished by the above ame d- fi ment. First specifically it is s ecificall indicated that the inst- ll- 1 I a'I' ation of landscaping 'can be accomplished in phases if th- III construction of the -improvements pursuant to the planned i' -9- 1 • I / y I I tl ill unit development are undertaken in phases. As presently written, subsection (5) (a) makes it unclear as to whether landscaping of portions of a project is to be allowed as construction is commenced under each phase or whether land- scaping must be accomplished with respect to the entire property which is the subject of the planned unit develop- ment. IV Also, a ceiling of 150% of the cost of installing the approved landscaping and the maintenance of such landscaping 1,1 is included in the proposed modification. As presently written, the Subsection imposes an open ended obligation upon the developer to furnish a performance bond of unspeci- fied magnitude. All that is known under the present wording is that any bond must be in a minimum face amount of 150% of I„ the installation costs with respect to the approved land- scaping. 19.1 Section IX (6) , Deferred Improvements: It is recommended that this Subsection be rewritten or deleted in its entirety. As it now reads, a final plan cannot be submitted for approval by the planning commission or the City Council until "all improvements are constructed in a satisfactory manner and approved by the appropriate depart- ments. " InInet effect, this Subsection puts the developer, and all improvements, financing, leasing and occupancy of I 1 -10- I ' ql the subject property under the constraint of a failure to receive City Council approval after, in some instances, 11 millions of dollars and substantial periods of time have been expendeld in the development of the project. The requirement that the City Council may review the project subsequent .to the completion of construction and deny fin 1 II 91' approval of a planned unit development is substantially j impractical from the developer' s standpoint. A more rears- . tic approach to this problem would be to have final City Council approval at -a much earlier stage after full and complete review of the planned unit development by the appropriate ;departments and after public hearings had been conducted. . A major drawback to this Subsection. (6). .is..-th 't 11 it obviates the intended purpose of a planned unit develop- ment, i.e. , ithe encouragement of the development of large hl blocs of property in ' a manner which will obtain the most I beneficial1u1se of such land. In brief, a planned unit development is nothing regu- lation than a form of land use re u- lation which Modifies underlying zoning and platting requirements. Questions of whether buildings have been properly constructed should not be the function of the City Council and lare more adequatelydisposed of pursuant to tihe , 1 P normal building permit procedures. i -11- I -Y li 20. Section X(:2) (a) , Vicinity Map: It is recom 1 11 il 11 m-nded that the last sentence of this Subsection be rewritten , t show that the required vicinity map is to depict the II " xisting" streets inarea covered by the proposed planne•, 1, II unit .develop ent rather than the proposed streets to be c nstructed within'. the planned unit development. Further, , t e developer may not have any information concerning the " roposed streets in those areas adjacent to his propert 11 21. . Section X(7) (b) , Large Planned Unit Develop- m nts: This Subsection concerns itself with the ability of a develo er to submit a "master plan" for a large planned 111 u it development. It is found in a section which P P ur ort-dl Y I concerns 'itelf only with the expiration of approved pre- liminar lans.. It . is suggested that master plans are Y P g g exceedingly important to many developers and warrant more extensive treatment than is provided in the Ordinance. I 1 is suggested that this subject be set forth in a separate S-ction which Section might provide substantially as folio s: 1 1. Purpose. For a large planned 'I unit development, the developer may ,'' request the city to adopt a master plan III, for the development of the entire planned ii'' unit development (the 'Master Plan' ) . The Master Plan shall set forth in written II narrative form the proposed uses and development standards in the development of the project including densities, common , -12- I ill'. 11 II openspace, landscaped areas, assigning, III p ie p ap r s, , parking, phasing, ownership and restric- 1 tions, together with the following: 1 . A. Vicinity map in accordance with I, Section X(2) (a) . I ' B. A site map or maps drawn to I scale of not less than one inch represent- I ing 50 feet showing the following: 4'' 11 1. Name and dimensions of existing streets bounding or touchingII the boundaries of the development. 2. Existing buildings and other improvements, including identifi- cation of types. 2. Written Narrative Statement. t tement. A wriltten narrative statement shall be required of the developer and shall provide the following information: I A. The program for anticipated development, including the proposed uses III and staging or timing of the development. B. Provisions to assure permanence and maintenance of public or common open spalce through an owners ' association, II merlchants', association, condominium development, or other means acceptable to the city. C. Statementor ta bulation t bulation of den- II sities proposed for each use to be incor- porated in the planned unit development. . I Il II D. Statement describing the rela- tionship of the proposed planned unit development to the city' s comprehensive 1 plan. j 3. Review and Approval of Master Plan. The Master Pl an shall be submitted ICI -13 III - , 1 I i y i to the planning commission and reviewed and approved as set forth in Section X (2) , (3)', (4) , and (5) , as the same may apply11, to the narrative statement and maps required above. Upon such approval, the Master Plan shall be submitted to the City Council for adoption as an ordinance with respect to the property which is to be developed pursuant to the Master Plan. Upon approval as an ordinance, the devieloper may make application for neces- sary permits for the development of the planned unit development. 1 4. Effect of Master Plan. Upon approval, of the Master Plan by the City Council, said Master Plan shall consti- tute the development standards for the plainned unit development and the phasing thereunder, if any. 5. General. The planning commis- sion may establish a time limit for the Master Plan which, upon proper applica- tion may be extended for good reason. Once the City Council has approved the Master Plan submitted in accordance with this section, the developer must within a period of- two (2) years commence the 1 first phase of the development. For the Master Plan to remain valid, the developer H shall complete each phase within the time periods contained in the Master Plan previously approved by the City Council. " i 22.1 Section X(8) (c) , Occupation of Structures: It is recommended that this Subsection be rewritten to11, specifically provide that the completion of the buildings within one phase and/or the receipt of a certificate of occupancy with respect to the buildings within a planned i -14- li I ' ' I I 1111 j ' II , nit development or a phase shall be sufficient to allow lllj 11 III 'full and complete utilization of that, building by-the owner,• essee, or others. • !I • 23. Section Xi, Final Review: It is suggesteill II .' HI that this section be rewritten to indicate that upon pre-' J,11 111 iminary approval the planned unit development or master j 1 I 1)lan shall be submitted to the City Council for hearings and II ,11 • approval and adoption' as an ordinance. . Again, it may be II ,1 -impractical to require a developer to expend substantial j IH amounts of mon ey and time upon the . condition that after ,I, 11, completion of the construction of. the improvements the 1, City Council will have the right to review- that developmen t - ' and disapprove the issuance of the final' permit even thou•h II! j III all condit4ons of' the planned unit development ordinance I 1,11 have been met and. all conditions of` environmental law, I I building codes and procedures have been complied with. Tie III basic theory of a planned unit development is' the develop= 'I'I 11 vent of an 'overall concept for the improvement of a certain' area. To allow the City Council to withhold' final approval IL ' after all improvements have been installed pursuant to th; Ilii planned unit development ordinance,. the building permitHI 1 jll I H • procedures; environmental- procedures and other compliances I� 1 is contrary to the basic purpose of a planned unit develo ° t li • -15- I I 1 ent. Further, the review procedures required in the ,preliminary stages and the building stages can be adequately provided for in the building permit application stage and at the time the certificate of occupancy is granted by the City. It is believed that the city will have sufficient sanctions throughout the entirety of the preliminary approval '�11 and construction phases to insure absolute compliance with the planned unit development ordinance and building codes . 11 I - I I j Ilia' I ' { i I I 1,11 -16- I _ . _ all Renton City Council 6/7/76 Pag 5 NEW BUSINESS - Continued '' Portable Unt MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THE QUESTION OF BUYING OR '11 for Special BUILDING A STEEL FRAMED PORTABLE UNIT (WITH ROOF, WITHOUT SIDES) BE 1" Outdoor Ser ices REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEEE TQ REPORT 'i' BACK. CARRIED. I^ UAB Program Council President Stredicke presented letter from Mayor Delaurenti to the Senators and Representatives of the Renton area urging support 1 for continuation of the Urban Arterial Board program as this is now I in it final stages and has enabled the city to accomplish major improve- ments. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, THE MATTER OF CONTINUA II - ' TION OF THE UAB PROGRAM BE REFERRED TO THE LEGISLATION COMMIITTEE FOR 1 RESOLUTION TO BE PRESENTED TO THE LEGISLATORS IN OLYMPIA. CARRIED. III Transfer of MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER MAYOR'S' LETTER Funds OF 6/4/76 TRANSFERRING FUNDS IN FINANCE AND WATERWORKS UTILITY FUNDS, TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CARRIED. planned Unit I MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THE P.U.D. ORDINANCE, BE BROUGHT l: Development 1 TO COUNCIL NEXT MONDAY 6/14/76 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Councilman McBeth ;1 rdinance i asked to have this hearing placed at the end of the agenda on that ;1' ublic Hearing I date. MOTION CARRIED. j III pecial Meeting Councilman McBeth announced a special meeting on Wednesday June 16, - i;, 12:00 noon at Hungry Wolf Restaurant, Sam Reid former Secretary of 1 State and Commissioner, to speak to Commission for Constitutional j Alternatives. McBeth invited all interested to attend. 1 Special Aware MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, CITY COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AND . i Hl MAKE 'APPROPRIATE SPECIAL AWARD TO RENTON POLICE -DEPARTMENT, POLICE j OFFICERS AND TO OUR CITIZENS INVOLVED IN THE JUNE 3, 1976 HOLD UP yII, ALTERCATION. CARRIED. Community Se vices Community Services Committee Chairwoman Seymour presented committee ,i' ommittee Re.ort report recommending approval of a request by Ray E. Gervais for side- I Sidewalk Repair walk repair' as provided in Resolution #1955. This policy requires Ray E. Gervais that such work be accomplished on a time available basis of city crews and that materials be paid for by the property owner. MOVED. BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR. Councilwoman Seymour noted letter from Gervais had been referred by the Mayor's office., CARRIED. I, Sidewalk Repair The Community Services Committee report recommended city policy be II olicy changed to .esignate the Public Works Director as the responsible I, 'Resolution 1955) official in approving such sidewalk repairs in the future. The report further recommended no specific budgetary allocation, but that such 0 repairs be dependent on time availability of city crews , and' on a first-come, first-served basis. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND AMEND RESOLUTION #1955. CARRIED. ORDINANCES Legislation Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report recom- ommittee Report mending first reading of an ordinance appropriating revenue in amount rdinance #3 35 of $107,402. 71 for flood control (Federal Disaster Relief Funds) . ;I Following first reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, Alppropriatio COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL ,!,'' Qf Funds READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings of ordinance, it wasIMOVED BY �" federal Disaster CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Relief Funds ALL AYES. CARRIED. Cedar River Trails Legislation Committee report recommended first reading of an ordinance Master Plan approving the amendment to the city's Comprehensive Plan regarding the Cedar River Trails Plan. Following first reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGIS- ,J LATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. j 1 green River alley The Legislation Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- omprehensiv nance approving the amendment to the city' s Comprehensive Plan regard- Plan ing the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. I f pr. 111 !III Renton City Council 6/7/76 Page 6 ORDINANCES - Continued Council Procedures The Legislation Committee report recommended first reading of an Ordinance ordinance amending Council procedure by including the consent agenda. Amended Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3036 The Legislation Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- Clearview Cable nance granting to Clearview TV Cable, Inc. an extension of existing TV Franchise contract untill March 31 , 1977 (See committee report Page 4) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mrs. Freda J. McPherson,whose letter was referred to the Public Safety Committee earlier in meeting, inquired as to when response to letter would be received, noting her respect for the Fire Department. Public Safety Committee Chairman McBeth invited to Mrs. McPherson to the committee meeting of June 15 (see schedule) . ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Melting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk m CITY OF RENTON ;, I Ilia NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Ijjl . I BY II1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has 1 • fixed the 14th day of ,liinp , 19 76 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal IIII , Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a ,il public hearing to consider the following : I ;III, , Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, regulating the uses permitted, design; standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for I • the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. III 11 idi , ;11 I • 11 Any and all interested persons are invited to be present ill to voice approval , .disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON . I d(,.x' (. - 7/ e {•._ III !- Delores A. Mead , City Clerk Il it DATE OF PUBLICATION I i,1 II _._._J4mw-1-A-, 19-76 — CERTIFICATION 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss . 1I, COUNTY OF KING ) 1 t III ' T%ti'�.y/� . jive 2 e I , L e S� � ��i >e . � hereby certify tha 1��s 1 W) copies of the above notice were posted by me in 7ro.e/v j, Ttr conspicuous places on the property described and one . copy was posted at the Ci y Municipal Building , Renton , 1 Wa -hington on date of r J/Ay J' _, 19 7 I Signed G%a � �L� , II I II II 1 I AT ..EST . III 1!11 Notary Public_: in_and ',for the State , of Washington-, re-siding at Renton . j 1 IIII _ III 1 III 1 . 1 CITY OF RENTON 'I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY ' ' RENTON CITY COUNCIL • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has Fixed the 14th day of ,limp , 1976 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal :uilding, Renton , Washington , as the time and place for a •ublic hearing to consider the following : !1I y;', Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. I I il 1 Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. I CITY OF RENTON I Delores A. Mead, City Clerk 4 DATE OF PUBLICATION . June 10, 1976 i CERTIFICATION li' �I, STATE OF WASHINGTON) H ii ss . II COUNTY OF KING ) ' o I, hereby certify that ad three ( 3) copies of the above notice were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City Municipal Building , Renton , ' 1. Washington on date of , 19 . '' Signed ATTEST : i. Notary .Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at Renton. '.I, ,1„ III INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: Les Phillips, Public Works Dept. DATE Jima 9, 1 Q7ti FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE: Public Hearing Notice - PUD ORDINANCE I j Enclosed all.e twenty-five copies of the above-captioned Public Nearing Notice. ,Please post all around town. The hearing will be next Monday, Jung 14, 1976. Please ireturn certification to this office. Thanks a lot I � I � i , CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 14th day of .1iinp , 19 76 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON A.4 1 (-et e7 Delores A. Mead , City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION JunQ 10, 1976 Il [KajyvJohns�tn • (et, f' - c(u (1� Renton 1?''�- hlands Shoppin_ Center jji Greater R:nton Chamber.'` Commerce , "=-`:' P.O. Bo .___ 018 �00 Rainer AveN:., 1 , f ? Renton Wa. 98055). . 1, :I t,,,, e,nton Wa 98'055 *: A i_..•a ........,, _... 17:%,"r' „j` 1 Victoria Park Homeowners Ass . `•'''""'' "" ` Sherwood Martin P.O. Box 1104 :1:1' 3728 Park Ave. N. Renton W_ . 98055 ; a ;,..' •'- Renton Wa. 98055 ,,,, ** Willia Cokely # . The Austin Co . U. S . Soil Conservotnion `Service ' ;' ; 8'00 S .W. 16th St. ' -,f!, 35 So . Grady 'Way Renton Wa. 98055 : I, r> Evergreen Bldg. t„ Renton;, Wa 98055 , i J. E. B. Hu se ' • R. J. Hanan I. 700 N.W. 3rd St. GroupHealth Renton Wa. 98055 Coop. Of Puget Sound p 200 15th Ave E. ' .'..;.,...• `" Seattle Wa. 98112 • -' ._. ** Walter Jascers' f. , ! '!•, 1 Linda. Ritzau Environme tallmpact State.ment . Off. f L'.. • 2032 Dayton Drive" S . E . Environmental, ProtedItion Agency ', Renton Wa. 98055 ?, .'1200 - 6th Ave. ;1. . ',-•, Seattle, Wa.. 98101. i • Dennis Lundblad ," , - ! ! 1 1- Susan Ringwood State Of ashington _ ;: :�r.:- !, Dept. Of cology , i;- :"` '• 16841- 124th Ave. S .E . { St. Martils dollegefCampuS: - Renton Wa. 98055 ! '1., Lacey, Wa 98504 - " _ x_ Mr. & Mrs Douglas McLean . Paul Scott 7004 So. 30th St. 1 , - Milwaukee Railroad ' a Seattle,W. . 98104 j . `' Property Mgt. Division I 801 Skinner Bldg. S e at l e W a 98101 •" Mr. Ken Mauerman Jim Linds .y'. Enviromental Quality Division !' Puget Sou d Council 'Of Government. Dept. of Ecology , 216 - 1st Ave;. So. 4350 150th Ave. N .E. . . Seattle, a; ,98.104 .' Redmond, Wa. 98502 i 1'.a_ Planning •oordin•ator` - • 1" ,;,'`: -'. . .• Donald A. Cowles ,', . Regional Mgr. I 6230 Sout center Blvd. r' :,,,.,t '�'''. Industrial & Real Estate Dev. Dept. Tukwila, a. 98068 . .' Burlington Northern RaiJlroad i, �..•.. F 830 Central. Bldg/Seattle Wad ti Roger C. Suttle Mr. John Lamb 2225 N.E. 165h St". t %:'`' ,, 'r '';'''t%: Municipal Research Director Renton, Wa. 98055 1' I I:;','--' .. . • 4719 Brooklynn Ave. N. E f Seattle Wa. 9810511 Puget Pow- r & j I, Lig ht Co .L. Puget, Pow r Bldg. - '.x ;; , Mrs . Jane E . Shafer, Pr sident I' I . Bellvue ,' a. 98004. League of Woman Voters/King Co'.SO 505 No. Central �' ,, _ _gent Wa. 98031 l' i ) I . Robert W. Thorpe - U. S . Soil ConservatOpn Service , ''3050 Isla d Crest 'Way .'#1'9 35- Grady Way- Evergree Bldg. •;fiercer Is and,Wa. 9804.0,. : Renton Wa. 98055 , ' it ``'' 11 j 11' u' 4 �' T tf ,� t4} k vt �, •' v }'>k'ttt t•qt -I or�d C ,tr^o.n1C1e_, h.,..',. }, " .,r i r"'"n-7 f .ftEa- �dG r �' l w nY : •.f'i i; ;: ::,F.>°, � � Houser Why S, ' Cj t = € "°nx r�-Rent'on,,°',uWa 98055 i rs } 1; Vl4 �' t { }• I :;.1, c. }C-.. r st of :.,.„„ .:.,t King Co. Dept '' ''` Plannin Division- ;. "�''`' pf & Community Developmen 1 P.1 annin Bldg.dg ' 's : Rin. #405 King Co . Admin. • ''; ''', ."'-'� Seattle,• Wa. 98104 .;,y:`r-- ,.,,Michael Smith' '-r =,A 3402 N. E. 7th St. ,��,*:'- ':Renton,' Wa 98055 { : ;f Director, Of Planning , II' . :-'F`,- ,.;', P l-anning Dept. , :^f .,: City Hall "9-' P.O.• Box 310 -',X:' Kent Wa. 98031 :. w .:., . :w , Edwards II ;;', Robert ;'' f'''„ `Renton Shopping Center ii . '' ''- Renton Wa. 98055 „II f -;-:�.::'; nton 'News' : a2a3 ':Wel.1S,; i,Ave= .,? _ ''7..� xi'� °' `` ,Yt K-lial :a el Porter- r e s Rofi;l ',n; Hills Homeowners '�` , - - .vi, ;, 2:010;1,`Dayton Drive..S E , . I s4I Renton, Goa .9'80.55 . , III Y�w '9 1)' st } : I ,, - n f•t J / W�� - .1d � J I. l I ; ;` ; -3, 'U;1'' ', .7 czar e �]�r • l p$ t t� i + n t /, /� j 7 r/ "iiI L f f� i - 1, o '1, CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 14th day of :hop , 19 7fi , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. 1; Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION June 10, 1976 { Planning Division - ig County Dept. Mr. John Lan of Planning & Communy Development Municipal Rewcarch Director Room 405 King County Administration Bit 4719 Brooklyn Ave. N.E. Seattle, WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98105 ,. Mrs. Jane E. Shafer, President Director of Planning League of Women Voters Planning Dept. King County South P. 0. Box 310, City Hall 505 No. Central Kent, WA 98031 Kent, WA 98031 Robert L. Edwards U.S. Soil Conservation Service -,. Renton Shopping Center 35 Grady Way - Evergreen Bldg. Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 V _ Renton Highlands Shopping Center Mr. Ken Mauerr�an, tn P. 0. Box 2018 Environmental Quality Division Renton, WA 98055 Dept. of Ecology 4350 - 150th Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98502 Sherwood Martin Puget Power Light Co. CI3728 Park Ave. N. Puget Power Building Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 1 The Austin Co. ** Kay Johnson 800 S.W. 16th St. Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce Renton, WA 98055 300 Rainier Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 • R. J. Hanan Victoria Park Homeowners Association Group Health Coop of Puget Sound 200 - 15th Ave. E. P. 0. Box 1104 Seattle, WA 98112 Renton, WA 98055 Linda Ritzau William Cokely 2032 Dayton Drive S.E. U.S. Soil Conservation Service Renton, WA 98055 35 S. Grady Way Evergreen Building Renton, WA 98055 Susan Ringwood Dennis L. Lundblad 16841 - 124th Ave. S.E. State of Washington Renton, WA 98055 Department of Ecology 1 , St. Martins College Campus Lacey. WA 9R5D4 Paul Scott Mr. & Mrs. Douglas McLean Milwaukee7004 So. 130th St. Railroad Seattle, WA 98178 Property Mgt. Division p 801 Skinner Bldg. Seattle. WA 98101 1 , y Donald A. Cowles, Regional Manager Jim Lindsay 1 Industrial & Real Estate Dev. Dept. Puget Sound Council of Governments Burlington Northern Railroad 216 - 1st Ave. S. 830 Central Building Seattle, WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98104 I hr M Planning Coordinator < 6230 Southcenter Blve. Tukwila, WA 98068 Roger C. Suttle 2225 N.E. 16th St. Renton, WA 98055 Robert W. Thorpe 3050 Island Crest Way #19 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Michael Smith 3402 N.E. 7th St. Renton, WA 98055 ** Walter Jascers Environmental Impact Statement Office • Environmental Protection Agency 1200 - 6th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 J.E.B. Hulse 700 N.W. 3rd St. Renton, WA 98055 Record Chronicle ** 801 Houser Way S. Renton, WA 98055 ** Greater Renton News 213 Wells Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Michael Porter, President Rolling Hills Homeowners Association 2001 Dayton Drive S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Ili II Renton City Council Special Meeting - 5/20/76 - Page 3 PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. Councilwoman Seymour inquired about the listed uses under B-1 on Pages 7 and 8 and why greenhouses, motels and hotels, and lodges serving alcoholic beverages were not included. Ass't. City Attorney Warren replied they apparently were not included in B-1 zone unless we could construe they were a similar use. Some discussion ensued about allowing for a changing society and should allow for all uses in the proper place. Ass' t. City Attorney Warren suggested expanding the language to include a defini- i tion to commercial "which shall include, but not be limited to". MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THE DEFINITION OF THE B-1 ZONE AND PHRASING CONCERNING ALLOWABLE USES BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED. Discussion followed regarding Item (19) covering undertaking establishments and crematories, with need for special permit from the Planning Commission. MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THE REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL PERMIT BE DELETED FROM ITEM (19) , ALL WORDS AFTER "CREMATORIES" BE STRICKEN. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Seymour inquired about Section VI, Item C. , regarding height limit of 95 feet; the buildings in B-1 adjacent to single families, if you have removed reference to stories in the other sections, this is not consistent. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, TO CHANGE THE FOURTH LINE OF ITEM (C) TO "SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35 FEET IN HEIGHT, NOT EXCEEDING 25 ADDITIONAL FEET BY SPECIAL PERMIT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING AND EXAMINATION OF THE LOCATION" . MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, Section 4-715, SUBSECTION (A) , CHANGE THE CORE AREA TO READ "BOUNDED BY THE CENTER LINES OF SMITHERS AVE. S. FROM SOUTH 4TH PLACE TO S. 3RD AVENUE AND LOGAN AVE. S. FROM S. 3RD ST. TO THE CEDAR RIVER, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY CEDAR RIVER, EAST TO MILL AVE. S. , SOUTH TO S. 4TH AND WEST TO SMITHERS AVE. S. " WHICH TAKES IT BEYOND THE CENTER LINE OF THAT STREET. Extension over to the river allows for expansion for the same core area. Councilwoman Seymour said she thought boundary of Cedar River too far north and core area could always be extended later. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT SECTION VI WITH THE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT SECTION VII AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke remarked that it seemed to him that movie theatres should all be in separate I zones and further thought there should be a restriction within the general downtown area, not the core area, on pornographic movies and that type thing. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT THE MATTER OF MOVIE THEATRES AND RESTRICTIONS BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Councilman McBeth said this matter was already in the Public Safety Committee, however, the problem is three different things, probably all constitutional , but it may be difficult to put into a zoning ordinance. STREDICKE CHANGED HIS MOTION TO ADD A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE TO THE ORDINANCE SO THAT IF ANY ONE SECTION IS CHALLENGED AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THAT IT WON'T AFFECT THE REST OF THE ORDINANCE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR. MOTION CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.*MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY McBETH, THAT THE ORDI- NANCE AND AMENDMENTS BE REFERRED TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR A PROPER ORDINANCE IN FINAL FORM AND BRING BACK TO COUNCIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Councilwoman Seymour said there was still too many incon- sistencies in the ordinance, the matter of special permits has not been settled, too many points have not been settled. Moved by Stredicke, to amend the motion to refer the question of special permits also to the Legislation Committee. Amendment died for lack of second.*MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Clymer advised Councilwoman Seymour to consult with the City Attorney so he can advise the committee, also, any Councilman can propose modifications or changes to the document. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THAT THE MATTER OF REFERRAL AND PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ON SPECIAL PERMITS BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW' AND REPORT BACK. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke said the Council will postpone the Hearing on the P.U.D. ordinance until the zoning ordinance is approved. Adjournment MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH TO ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED. Council adjourned at 11 :12 P.M. j tr,f e,.,44: ef>2 Z i ; .i axine Motor, Deputy City Clerk ^ 1� Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. 1L'xl�r1�...Cainp.egns being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that..elm is the of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a N i.ce..Q.f....�A�►C.�mutes.... a' °' A eeti ..of the...Ren.ton City k ....Council as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 114, day of May ,19..76...,and ending the } N day of 19 both dates rt'4" .r#i t a inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribersmot. during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 11.N.+A,,��,�, which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the < first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. - ...chief...clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 day of Nay 191.««��6... ei Notary Public in and for the State of ashington, residing at Kent, ng County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 ID CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF CONTINUED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Thursday, May 20, 1976 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has continued its meeting of May llth, recessed to Thursday, May 20, 1976, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor of the Renton Municipal Building, pursuant to provisions of R.C.W. 42.30.080. The purpose of said meeting shall be to hold a continued Public Hearing on amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance and a Public Hearing on the adoption of an ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, and any other matters as may come before the body at that time. aein. Q �CMead, City Clerk Date of Publication May 14, 1976 A CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 11 , 1976 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has called a Special Meeting of the Council to be held on Tuesday, May 11 , 1976, at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor of the Renton Municipal Building, pursuant to provisions of R.C.W. 42.30.080. The purpose of said meeting shall be to hold Public Hearings on amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance and adoption of an ordi- nance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City, and any other matters as may come before the body at that time. ,dizi,„,„ Delores A. Mead, City lerk Date of Publication April 30, 1976 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting May 11 , 1976 Municipal Building Tuesday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti , presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called the meeting to order. COUNCIL ROLL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; ROBERT E. McBETH, KENNETH CALL BRUCE, WILLIAM J. GRANT, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J. PERRY. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILWOMAN PATRICIA SEYMOUR. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LARRY WARREN, IN ATTENDANCE Ass't. City Attorney; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RON NELSON, Building Division. Mayor of Tukwila Mayor Delaurenti introduced the Honorable Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor of Visits Tukwila, who was greeted with a round of applause. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, Zoning Ordinance posted and distributed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending the city's Zoning Ordinance on R-1 Residence Single Family, R-2 and R-3 Residence Districts, R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple Dwellings, and B-1 Business District, also as concerns parking and loading in the downtown area. Planning and Community Development Committee Chairman Perry distributed copies of the Committee amendments to the Councilmen and the public and Recess MOVED FOR A TEN MINUTE RECESS TO REVIEW THE AMENDMENTS, SECONDED BY McBETH. MOTION CARRIED. Council reconvened at 8:30 p.m. with all Councilmen present as previously reported. Councilman Perry explained some of the revisions to the ordi- nance and Mayor Delaurenti asked the audience for comments. George Pasco, 1900 N.E. 16th St. , Pasco Realty, inquired about a 5,000 square foot property that was unplatted, and if he could ask for a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Assistant City Attorney Warren advised that anyone could apply for a variance with the Board of Adjustment.if there were unusual circumstances. Councilman Stredickeremarked about the requirement for 100 feet from residential property for churches and j parking not being allowed within that area; why not for apartments, noting just annexed property, the Woods annexation, and the Church of the Nazarene was planning to build on that property. He also inquired of any provisions for libraries, playgrounds, quasi public uses such as golf courses in the single family residential area. Councilman Clymer questioned the rationale behind Items 3 and 5, Churches, 100 foot requirement on setbacks from residential property and no parking within that area; also, Item 6, Views, urging 35' ht. limitation and questioned the criteria of a one horsepower motor in Section 4(a), number of decibels being a more scientific criteria; 150% landscaping bond was also ques- tioned. Mayor Delaurenti invited audience comment on Section I. Clark Teegarden, 264 Seneca Ave. N.W. , said that a 100 foot setback pro- hibiting parking was too much, 20 feet or 25 feet, if it is screened, would provide adequate protection to the neighbors; also the height restriction on churches, most churches having steeples or bell towers, and some provision should be made for them. He also took exception to the wording in the existing ordinance, 4(a) and (b) , grammatically incorrect not being house depth. Robert Kenkman, 924 Bronson Way S. , Benton-McCarthy Realty, Inc. , remarked that ne agreed the 100 foot setback was excessive; also believed the 150% bond was excessive. Mr. George Speck of Union Ave. N.E. agreed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO AMEND SUBSEC- TION 6 TO REFLECT THAT THE CHURCH SPIRE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE HEIGHT RESTRICTION ON THE BUILDING. MOTION CARRIED. *MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO AMEND SUBSECTION 5 TO READ "25 FOOT SETBACK FOR PARKING OF VEHICLES FROM ANY ADJOINING DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL LOT OR AREA". It was Moved by McBeth, seconded by Perry, to amend the previous motion to read "50 foot setback". Roll Call - Aye - 3, McBeth, Grant and Perry. No - 3, Stredicke, Bruce and Clymer. Mayor Delaurenti voted No and broke the tie. Motion Failed. ROLL CALL ON THE 25 FOOT SET- BACK ORIGINAL MOTION: AYE - 3, STREDICKE, BRUCE AND CLYMER. NO - 3, McBETH, GRANT AND PERRY. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE. *ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY McBETH, TO CHANGE ITEM 9 TO ADD "ESTHETIC" AT BEGINNING OF FIRST SENTENCE. MOTION CARRIED. Renton City Council Special Meeting of 5/11/76 Page Three PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Zoning Ordinance MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO STRIKE ANY REFERENCE TO NUMBER OF STORIES AND JUST LEAVE 35 FEET IN HEIGHT IN R-2. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Perry remarked that Council should go back to the other sections and amend them. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY PERRY, THE AMENDMENTS AS RELATING TO R-2 BE ADOPTED AND ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Kenkman read a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council which referred to Section 4-715, subsection (a) , of the proposed ordinance and requested that it be amended to read that the downtown core area of Renton be bounded by Mill Ave. S. and Burnett Ave. S. , the Cedar River and S. 4th St. for the following reasons: to provide removal of residential homes in that area in a period of time; an economic growth for the city through construction of the downtown core area; a reasonable dollar return on the dollars already invested in the beautification of the downtown area; and a progressive step forward for Renton. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, SECTION 4-715 BE AMENDED TO READ CEDAR RIVER FOR THE REFERENCE TO S. 2ND ST. MOTION CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO RECESS AND CONTINUE THE MEETING TO THURSDAY, MAY 20, 1976, AT 8:00 P.M. , SPECIAL MEETING, SAME ORDINANCES. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting recessed at 11 :00 P.M. Delores A. Mead, C'ty Clerk J Ii ,1 I Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Barbers••C!lfntP �& na being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she..is the chief..clerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a...No.tic.A•••Qf•"•Yub1 i•c as it was published in regular issues(and 1' s not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period � of one. consecutive issues,commencing on the " '' `' 30 •day of April ,19...7.b..,and ending the 3, r 4 , dayof ,19 both dates + :"' -�r °�+� =�'r inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ' ' wt ` VIN , $. .charged for the foregoingpublication is the sum of Which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundre ords for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent *k • .; , insertion. 7 i 14' ^ T`tv`i- ; chief clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30 day of hpP1 . , 19..76 47 44_,L Notary Public in and for the State of ashington, residing at Kent, ing County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 er.,1(... Pa& e"-"-"a: Alt.°14:1 Renton City Council 5/3/76 Page 3 OLD BUSINESS - Continued - Aviation Committee Report - Continued Aero-Dyne Corp. The Aviation Committee report recommended the Mayor and City Clerk Lease be authorized to execute a lease agreement with Aero-Dyne Corporation so they may proceed with plans for $350,000 development proposal for the construction of a large aircraft maintenance hangar, flight school and administrative offices to replace existing facilities with additional parking and landscaping on unimproved piece of property west of the Shattuck Ave. entrance. The lease would be 30 yearswith two 5-year options. The report further recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute a Memorandum of Termination of the existing lease to coincide with effective date of new lease 6/1/76. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN AVIATION COMMITTEE REPORT. It was noted earthtoned color and special finish as recommended by the Planning staff would be used to minimize the impact of the large hangar facility. MOTION CARRIED. San Diego The Aviation Committee report recommended that Del Bennett, Airport Conference Director be authorized to attend the AAAE conference in San Diego May 16-19 which will relate to the airport master plan, revenue American Assoc. development and environment planning and ADAP, as well as meeting of Airport with Specialty Restaurants Corporation to conclude restaurant lease Executives negotiations. The report recommended referral to the Legislation Committee for fund transfer. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. It was noted none of the of the committee members would be able to attend the conference. MOTION CARRIED. Commendation Council President Stredicke submitted letter received from Lynda for Erwin Fey Wimbush, Secretary of the Spring Lake Community Club publicly Theater Owner commending Erwin Fey on his decision not to rent his two Renton theaters for pornographic movies. The letter noted respect and admiration for Mr. Fey for placing his ownpersonal high standards and values as well as his hopes for the community and future residents above personal gain. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, THIS COMMUNICATION BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Objection Councilman McBeth voiced objection to recent newspaper article which inferred Council committee met behind locked doors, explaining the committee has never met in closed session and further explaining I' incident of locked stairway door, asking that newspaper make correction. Councilman Grant also objected to closed meeting inference explaining open policy. Grant also objected to reference to"Fearless Four" voting block, noting response to individual issues and wishes of the citizens. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairwoman Seymour presented committee Committee Report report recommending Council concurrence in the request of the Histori- Supporting Trusses cal Society that two of the cantonerry structures be retained for Milwaukee RR historical purposes during removal of steel supporting trusses in Houser Way Milwaukee Railroad underground wiring project. The two overhead Undergrounding structures to be retained would be those 90 ft. east and 190 ft. west Project of the Mill Ave.S. and Houser Way intersection. The report notea the Historical Society has been in contact with Milwaukee RR and with their help plan to replace 280 ft. of cantonerry between the two structures and place historical plaque on the structures marking them as part of Renton's history. MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. PUD & Zoning Councilwoman Seymour asked for clarification with respect to the Ordinances Planned Unit Development and Zoning Ordinances with Public Hearing scheduled for May 11 , 1976. Asst. City Attorney Warren advised Page 7.a. of the PUD Ordinance and line at bottom of Page 4 of the Zoning Ordinance were drafted at the committee's request and will be included in the original ordinances. fiEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke noted receipt of correspondence from Capt. Differential Pay Phelan re pay differential of uniformed employees. Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Clymer, refer matter to Finance and Personnel Committee. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, SUBSTITUTE MOTION COUNCIL REFER DIFFERENTIAL PAY MATTER TO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT BUDGET HEARINGS. CARRItu. i ii ill 4( /UU nH,,male- s 7ig77,4 BURLINGTON NORTHERN 1 800 Third Avenue — Lobby 3 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND Seattle, Washington 98104 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Telephone (206) 624-1900 ;,,,Ni6161178 , MAY 1976 c-,3_, ro 0)03 RECE1VEDry Ms. Delores A. Meed r- C1 n''of REN/. N ,�� May 13, 197 6 City Clerk �, CLERKS OFFICE,)\ Cityof Renton �' , \'' C 1„rti s Renton, WA �`'° � �' Dear Ms. Meed: Would you please furnish me with a copy of the proposed ordinance establishing and creating a planned unit development for the City that was to be a matter for a council hearing on May 11, so that I may review the ordinance insofar as it may affect Burlington Northern property within the City of Renton. Yours truly, NJ. Gordon pager,, Property Management 11 II i .r RENTON CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting y 11 , 1976 Municipal Building uesday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti , presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called the meeting to order. 'OUNCIL ROLL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; ROBERT E. McBETH, KENNETH 'ALL BRUCE, WILLIAM J. GRANT, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J. PERRY. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILWOMAN PATRICIA SEYMOUR. MOTION CARRIED. sITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LARRY WARREN, N ATTENDANCE Ass't. City Attorney; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RON NELSON, Building Division. .yor of Tukwila Mayor Delaurenti introduced the Honorable Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor of isits Tukwila, who was greeted with a round of applause. "UBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, oning Ordinance posted and distributed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending the city's Zoning Ordinance on R-1 Residence Single Family, R-2 and R-3 Residence Districts, R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple Dwellings, and B-1 Business District, also as concerns parking and loading in the downtown area. Planning and Community Development Committee Chairman Perry distributed copies of the Committee amendments to the Councilmen and the public and 'ecess MOVED FOR A TEN MINUTE RECESS TO REVIEW THE AMENDMENTS, SECONDED BY McBETH. MOTION CARRIED. Council reconvened at 8:30 p.m. with all Councilmen present as previously reported. Councilman Perry explained some of the revisions to the ordi- nance and Mayor Delaurenti asked the audience for comments. George Pasco, 1900 N.E. 16th St. , Pasco Realty, inquired about a 5,000 square foot property that was unplatted, and if he could ask for a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Assistant City Attorney Warren- advised that anyone could apply for a variance with the Board of Adjustment.if there were unusual circumstances. Councilman Stredicke remarked about the requirement for 100 feet from residential property for churches and parking not being allowed within that area; why not for apartments, noting just annexed property, the Woods annexation, and the Church of the Nazarene was planning to build on that property. He also inquired of any provisions for libraries, playgrounds, quasi public uses such as golf courses in the single family residential area. Councilman Clymer questioned the rationale behind Items 3 and 5, Churches, 100 foot II requirement on setbacks from residential property and no parking within II that area; also, Item 6, Views, urging 35' ht. limitation and questioned 11 the criteria of a one horsepower motor in Section 4(a), number of decibels being a more scientific criteria; 150% landscaping bond was also ques- tioned. Mayor Delaurenti invited audience comment on Section I. Clark Teegarden, 264 Seneca Ave. N.W. , said that a 100 foot setback pro- hibiting parking was too much, 20 feet or 25 feet, if it is screened, would provide adequate protection to the neighbors; also the height restriction on churches, most churches having steeples or bell towers, and some provision should be made for them. He also took exception to in orrectl' the wordingin the existingordinance, 4 a and (b) , grammatically incorrect, ( ) not being house depth. Robert Kenkman, 924 Bronson Way S. , Benton-McCarthy Realty, Inc. , remarked that ne agreed the 100 foot setback was excessive;, also believed the 150% bond was excessive. Mr. George Speck of Union Ave. N.E. agreed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO AMEND SUBSEC- TION 6 TO REFLECT THAT THE CHURCH SPIRE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE HEIGHT RESTRICTION ON THE BUILDING. MOTION CARRIED. *MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO AMEND SUBSECTION 5 TO READ "25 FOOT SETBACK FOR PARKING OF VEHICLES FROM ANY ADJOINING DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL LOT OR AREA". It was Moved by McBeth, seconded by Perry, to amend the previous motion to read "50 foot setback". Roll Call - Aye - 3, McBeth, Grant and Perry. No - 3, Stredicke, Bruce and Clymer. Mayor Delaurenti voted No and broke the tie. Motion Failed. ROLL CALL ON THE 25 FOOT SET- BACK ORIGINAL MOTION: AYE - 3, STREDICKE, BRUCE AND CLYMER. NO - 3, McBETH, GRANT AND PERRY. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE. *ORIGIN'AL MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY McBETH, TO CHANGE ITEM 9 TO ADD "ESTHETIC" AT BEGINNING OF FIRST SENTENCE. MOTION CARRIED. i Renton City Council Special Meeting of 5/11/76 Page Three PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Zoning Ordinance MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO STRIKE ANY REFERENCE TO NUMBER OF STORIES AND JUST LEAVE 35 FEET IN HEIGHT IN R-2. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Perry remarked that Council should go back to the other sections and amend them. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY PERRY, THE AMENDMENTS AS RELATING TO R-2 BE ADOPTED AND ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Kenkman read a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council which referred to Section 4-715, subsection (a) , of the proposed ordinance and requested that it be amended to read that the downtown core area of Renton be bounded by Mill Ave. S. and Burnett Ave. S. , the Cedar River and S. 4th St. for the following reasons: to provide removal of residential homes in that area in a period of time; an economic growth for the city through construction of the downtown core area; a reasonable dollar return on the dollars already invested in the beautification of the downtown area; and a progressive step forward for Renton. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, SECTION 4-715 BE AMENDED TO READ CEDAR RIVER FOR THE REFERENCE TO S. 2ND ST. MOTION CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, TO RECESS AND CONTINUE THE MEETING TO THURSDAY, MAY 20, 1976, AT 8:00 P.M. , SPECIAL MEETING, SAME ORDINANCES. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting recessed at 11 :00 P.M. Delores A. Mead, Cty Clerk J d II jv p enton City Council /26/76 Page 3 LD BUSINESS - Continued inance & Finance and Personnel Committee Member Perry submitted committee ersonnel report concurring in the Purchasing Agent's recommendation to award ommittee Report the surplus equipment from 4/21/76 bid opening (see Page 1 and attached tabulation) to the highest bidder and that the Purchasing Agent be urplus Equipment given permission to negotiate the sale of vehicle A-96, 1969 Ford, id Awards for which no bids received. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND AWARD EQUIPMENT TO HIGHEST BIDDERS. CARRIED. II ii ppointment The Finance and Personnel Committee report concurred in the Mayor's II oard of appointment of Maurice J. Bauer to Position No. 5 of the Board of adjustment Adjustment, term to expire September 6, 1977. MOVED BY STREDICKE, . J. Bauer SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND CONFIRM APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. urlington The Finance and Personnel Committee report recommended that the orthern Council authorize appropriation of $5,200 from excess revenue in the fight-of-Way Current Fund from the Logan Street vacation monies into Miscellaneous urnett Ave.S. Services Division Capital Outlay for the acquisition of additional right-of-way on Burnett Ave. S. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COM- A MITTEE. MOVED BY McBETH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, AMEND MOTION THAT THESE MONIES BE RETURNED TO THE LOGAN AVE. STREET VACATION FUND AS SOON AS I POSSIBLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: PERRY, BRUCE, McBETH; 3-NO: STREDICKE, SEYMOUR AND CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI BROKE THE TIE WITH AYE VOTE AND AMENDING MOTION CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. lamming & Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee evelopment report recommending that the following amendments to the zoning Committee Report ordinances be placed on their first reading and referred back to committee to hold until a public hearing is scheduled: an Ordinance Zoning Ordinance amending zoning ordinances R1 , R2, R3, R4 and B1 . Discussion of the endments amending ordinance ensued. Asst. City Attorney Warren noted the park- laced on ing and loading ordinance would be affected. MOVED BY McBETH, SECOND BY irst Reading BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT & REFER ORDINANCE TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATION COMMITTEES. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL PLACE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING. ROLL CALL FOR FIRST Special Meeting READING: 3-AYE: PERRY, BRUCE, McBETH; 3-NO: STREDICKE, SEYMOUR, CLYMER. Public -Hearing MAYOR DELAURENTI BROKE TIE AND VOTED AYE. MOTION CARRIED. ROLL CALL 5/11/76 VOTE ON REFERRAL TO COMMITTEES: 3-AYE: PERRY, BRUCE, McBETH; 3-NO: STREDICKE, SEYMOUR AND CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI BROKE TIE VOTE BY CASTING AYE VOTE AND MOTION CARRIED. II Mani -. joint� ' Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented joi t com 11 - D- - • au- A mittee report with Legislation Committee recommending that the PUD 1 0 dinance (Planned Unit Development) Ordinance as amended be placed on first (PUD) reading and referred back to committee to hold until public hearing. MOVED BY McBETH AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN COM- S.ecial Meeting MITTEE REPORT, ORDINANCE BE PLACED ON FIRST READING AND REFERRED BACK P.jblic Hearing TO COMMITTEES. Discussion ensued. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY 5/11/76 SEYMOUR, SUBSTITUTE MOTION THAT COUNCIL SET SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER 11 _ AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ._ ORDINANCE ON THE SECOND TUESDAY IN MAY AT 8:00 P.M. AND COPIES OF THE ORDINANCES BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL AND GENERAL PUBLIC TOMORROW MORNING. ROLL CALL ON SUBSTITUTE MOTION: 3-AYE: STREDICKE, SEYMOUR, CLYMER; 3-NO: PERRY, GRANT, BRUCE. MAYOR DELAURENTI CAST AYE VOTE AND BROKE THE TIE. SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED. For the record, Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee report recommending that a special Council meeting be held on May 11 , 1976 for the purpose of hearing the zoning ordinances and the PUD ordinance and that the ordinances be referred to this special meeting. R-cess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:30 and reconvened at 9:40 p.m. Roll Call : All six Council members present as previously stated. l II CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed Tuesday, the llth day of May 19 76 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : 1 . Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance relating to R-1 Residence Single Family, R-2 and R-3 Residence Districts, R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple Dwellings, and B-1 Business District, also as concerns parking and loading in the downtown area. 2. Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City,regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval ,- disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , city Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION April 30, 1976 CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) Twtrd I , L ‹O 11r ph, )), hereby certify that y fi copies of the above notice were posted by me in Tex,,Iy fiY-e a conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City Municipal Building , Renton , Washington on date of /4 77 7 , Signed ATTEST : '^r:r Notary Pu13li,c`.in,-afd ;€or the State of Wash ngt.an;. re il3 _ at Renton. fli 111 INTER-OFFICE MED TO: Les Phillips, Public Wurks Dept. DATE April 3Q•; 1976, J' FROIa1 P9eaa, City Clerk !I R-: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance and an Ordinance Establishing and Creattng a Planned Unit Development for the City ttached are, twenty-five (25) copies of the above-captioned Public Hearing Notice. ' I 'lease post all over town and return certification to this office. Thanks, 1 ' I I d CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has i fixed Tuesday, the 11th day of May 19 76 at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : 1 . Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance relating to R-i Residence Single Family, R-2 and R-3 Residence Districts, R-4 Apartment Houses and Multiple" Dwellings, and B-1 Business District, also as concerns parking and loading in the downtown area. 2. Adoption of an Ordinance establishing and creating a Planned Unit Development for the City,regulating the uses permitted, design, standards, procedures and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof in the development of new residential , commercial and industrial areas in the City of Renton. Copies of above two ordinances available in the Records Division of the Renton City Clerk's Office. • Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON 44,614, Delores A. Mead , city Clerk II 1,I DATE OF PUBLICATION April 30, 1976 I I, | Mr JO�D La i Planning Division - ,.�g County Dept. ' � c of Planning & i Development - Municipal R=*=arch Director Room 405 King Community jD�^'~r^^^~ Bn 4719 Brooklyn Ave. N.E. � �+« 8eattl�, �� �»~~~^~v '~~^ ~~ ~~'= � Seattle, WA 98105 104 | ' ' Mrs. Jane E. Shafer, President � Director Of Planning, League of Women Voters ~' | ! Planning Dept, King County South P. 0. Box 310, City Hall 605 No. Central | Kent, WA 98031 Kent, �� g���] � - / i | U 3 Soil CUD�erV�tiUO S�rV��� ~� � Robert L. E�#dr�S - ^ ^ ' 1 35 Evergreen Bldg. i R8DtOD Shopping Center u/�u�_�o� - ^ . | �''~''' R8DtOD W8 98O55 � Renton,, WA 98O�5. � " � ./ ~� | '- - - ' - '~ - - '-------------- ) Mr. Ken MaU8r0aD ~^ Renton .Highlands Shopping Center | P. U. Box 2018 EDVfrVn08Dtdl Quality Division ! | Renton,! WA 98055 ' De�t. of Ecology � ' ; �3�O'- 150th Ave. NE . | ; Qpd�oO� �� �O5O2 | � ''--`~ ' ~� _- _ �____'_--_ -'-_-`-. 3��rwOO M�rt�� pUget pONer � Light Co. | _^ | " 3728 Park Ave. N. < PWget Power Building | ' ^ ` 8ell8YUe �� 9O0O4 Renton,, WA 98055 " | - � � +* Kay Johnson ' / The Austin �-` | Greater Renton Chamber of CVmmerce � 80U S.W.Sh�h St i i ^ ` `Renton, 300 Rainier Ave. N^ ' ! Renton, WA 98055 / � ^ ~ � | R. J. HaDaD / Group H8d�t� �00p Of Puget Sound, Park Homeowners ASS0CiatjOD n | P. � 0UX llU4 Ave. E.200 - 15th E ! ^ ^ ! ` / i Seattle, WA 98112 R8Dt�D. `� ' WA 98065 " Linda R�tZdU ' ++ William COk8l� � | ~ y032 U 3 Soil C0D�erVdtiOD 38rVi�� | n Drive � E ^ ` ~~� ^~ ^ ` ' 35 SrGradv � R2DtUD, |WA 98059 � � Eve~`re -��u���ing � , ` Renton '. WA 98055 _ 3USaD RingwOod Dennis L. LUndblad 16841 - !124th Ave. S.E. ' State of Washington / l / Renton, �WA 98055 Department of Ecology / ` �t Martins College. n� �� Campus | ' � LaCeV. WA 48604 i - - -' -^-~^'- -- ' -�----- --' ` �-' - ---'---- ' ------' | : � Paul SCdtt Mr, & Mrs. Douglas MCL8OO . ^j | ' � 7D�4 �O^ l�Ut� 3t | Milwaukee Railroad ' ^ '� Property Mot. DfVi5iUD Seattle, WA 98178 � 801 Skinner Bld Seattle.! � | 1 � Donald A. Cowles, Regional Manager . Jim Lindsay IndUstrTal & Real Estate DeV. ' D� ^ ' Puget Sound Council of Governments Burlington Northern Railroad ' < 216 - l3t Ave. S. � 830 Central BWildiDQ � Seattle, WA 98104 ' ' v""++l" ux nolox / • - ', ! qwrir - - _ 1 . Planning Coor ator \ - 6230 Southcen__ Blve. Tukwila, WA 98068 1 . . , 1 1 Roger C. Suttle ., 2225 N.E. 16th St. ' Renton, WA 98055 ..., 11 . , _ . 1 , Robert W. Thorpe 3050 Island Crest Way #19 Mercer Island, WA 98040 . , 11 ' Michael Smith 3402 N.E. 7th St. . Renton, WA 98055 .., , . 1 ' ** Walter Jascers ,' Environmental Impact Statement Office • Environmental Protection Agency 1200 - 6th Avenue ..., 1 Seattle, WA 98101 - - . , J.E.B. Hulse 700 N.W. 3rd St. Renton, WA 98055 . _ __ . ___ 1 Record Chronicle ** _ I I! , !! 801 Houser Way S. . , Renton, WA 98055 , .1 i h 1 11 1 . . 11** Greater Renton News - 1 213 Wells Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 . , 1 Michael Porter, President Rolling Hills Homeowners Association , . 2001 Dayton Drive S.E.Renton, WA 98055 , ,.., 1 1 • . 1 1 I _ 'I ...., 1, , , ! , , . . 1 II - • - l I • PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 'REPORT APRIL 26 , 1976 • SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCES 1 The Planning, and Development Committee recommends that ' -he following amendments to the• zoning ordinances be • Placed on their first reading and referred back to Committee toehold until a public hearing is scheduled: an ordinance. amending zoning ordinances RI , R2 , R3 , R4 , and Bl. • • • Chairman eorge J. Perry F I l l i am J,, /77 ra n t Robert E. Mr.Beth ' I i - GJP :mg • • • • • • • I ' ' I