HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdden 14Version: March 2021 1
Site License Addendum
(Exhibit C to Master License Agreement No. ______________ Between
_______________________________ and City of Renton)
Company shall apply to the City for approval of this Site License Addendum by filling out the below
form and submitting the form to the City for approval with the applicable Administrative Fee. For
each Small Cell, the Company shall fill out a Site License Addendum.
This Site License Addendum (“Addendum”), made this _____ day of ____________, 20____ (the
“Site License Addendum Effective Date”) between the City of Renton, hereinafter designated the
“City” and ___________________, d/b/a ________, with its principal offices at
_________________________, hereinafter designated “Company”:
1. Addendum. This is a Site License Addendum as referenced in that certain Master License
Agreement between The City and Company dated ______________, ____ ("Agreement"). All of the
terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated hereby by reference and made a part hereof
without the necessity of repeating or attaching the Agreement. In the event of a contradiction,
modification or inconsistency between the terms of the Agreement and this Addendum, the terms of
this Addendum shall govern. Capitalized terms used in this Addendum shall have the same meaning
described for them in the Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein.
2.Project Location. Attachment 1 identifies the physical location of the City Poles on which the
Site Equipment shall be attached.
3.Project Description. Attachment 2 identifies the Site Equipment to be installed on the City
Poles and shall include the construction details (e.g. electrical and fiber connections, antennas, radios
and accessory components). If deviating from the standard detail, Company shall provide photo
simulations of such Site Equipment attached to the City Poles and a load bearing study. The photo
simulations shall include photos indicating the existing City Pole without the Site Equipment and with
the proposed Site Equipment attached. If there are any accessory components, for example conduit
holding backhaul or electrical, such accessory components shall be depicted in the photo simulations.
4.NIER Report. Company has commissioned an NIER Report for the City Poles. Such report
is attached hereto in Attachment 3.
5. Backhaul. Backhaul services shall be provided to the Site Equipment as follows:
□underground fiber □ aboveground fiber □ microwave □ other_________________
and from the following entity: __________________________________. Access to the backhaul
system shall be separate from the City’s communication and electrical conveyance system. The
Company, or its third party contractor, is responsible for the placement and installation of any junction
boxes.
6.Electrical Fee. The estimated peak draw power for the Small Cell is _______. The Small Cell
electrical usage falls within ____ tier as described in the Fee Schedule.
7.Usage of City-Owned Conduit. Company requests usage of City’s streetlight power conduit.
□Yes □No (if yes, see Attachment 4)
5978
ExteNet Systems
ExteNet Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation
3030 Warrenville Road, Suite 340 Lisle, IL 60532
December 18 2020
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
21.6 kwh
the 2nd
4
4
12 January 22
CAG-20-489, Adden #14-22
Version: March 2021 2
8.Term. The term of this Addendum shall run concurrently with the Agreement and shall
terminate upon the Agreement termination unless earlier terminated by a party consistent with the
Agreement.
9. Commencement Date. The Company shall notify the City upon the installation of its Site
Equipment on the City Pole.
10.Fees. The Rent and Administrative Fee for the Site Equipment installed pursuant to this
Addendum shall be in accordance with Section 6 of the Agreement.
11. Counterparts. This Site License Addendum may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original, but all of which will constitute one and the same document.
12. Authority. Each individual executing this Site License Addendum represents and warrants
that such individual is duly authorized to execute and delivery this Site License Addendum on behalf
of the party it represents.
13. Carrier. The following third-party wireless carrier’s equipment will be located on this City
Pole: _____________________________ or □ same as Company.
14. Acknowledgment. Company acknowledges that (i) this Site License Addendum is only
effective upon the signatures of both parties and (ii) Company shall not have the right to install its Site
Equipment on the City Poles until it has received Government Approvals and complied with the
requirements (including any insurance or bonding requirements) of such Government Approvals.
EXECUTED to be effective as of the Site License Addendum Effective Date.
CITY OF RENTON:
______________________________
By: ___________________________
Name: _________________________
Title:__________________________
COMPANY
______________________________
By: ___________________________
Name: _________________________
Title:__________________________
Exhibits:
Attachment 1 – Physical Location of City Poles
Attachment 2 – Photo Simulations, Description of Site Equipment and Load Bearing Study
Attachment 3 – NIER Report
Attachment 4 – Conduit Lease Addendum
Rachel Fenton
Government Relations Director - PNW
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
4
Nathan Janderscommunity and economic development
nathan janders
civil engineer III
Version: March 2021 3
Attachment 1
Physical Location of City Poles
City of Renton Pole No. 1092D - Adjacent to 350 Wells Ave N
(47.488403, -122.204336)
Version: March 2021 4
Attachment 2
Equipment Installation Plans/ Construction Details
TITLE SHEET
T−1
DRAWING INDEX
SITE INFORMATION PROJECT CONTACTS
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
VICINITY MAP
APPROVAL/SIGN OFF
SITE PHOTO
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE: 1092D
SITE COORDINATES
LATITUDE: 47° 29’ 18.25" N (47.488403°)
LONGITUDE: 122° 12’ 15.61" W (−122.204336°)
SITE ADDRESS
ADJACENT TO ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
SITE
100% CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
SC21001345
GENERAL NOTES
G−1CALL AT LEAST TWO WORKING
DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
DIG ALERT
LIMITS OF LIABILITY:ABBREVIATIONS:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS:
SITE SAFETY:
WORK REQUIREMENTS:
UTILITY REQUIREMENTS:
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WEATHERPROOFING:
CAST−IN PLACE CONCRETE:
“”
CONCRETE OR MASONRY ANCHORAGE:
REINFORCING STEEL:
CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE:
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
LEGEND:
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
SITE PLAN
A−1
1SITE PLAN
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
VICINITY MAP
SITE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN,
EQUIPMENT & ANTENNA LEVELS
A−2
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
1ENLARGED SITE PLAN2PROPOSED EQUIPMENT LEVEL
PROPOSED ANTENNA LEVEL
RAD CENTER OF 5G ANTENNAS @ 40’−3" A.G.L.
3
EXISTING & PROPOSED
WEST ELEVATION
A−3
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
2PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 1
EXISTING & PROPOSED
NORTH ELEVATION
A−4
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
12EXISTING NORTH ELEVATIONPROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
VALMONT POLE DESIGN
A−5
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
VALMONT POLE DESIGN
A−5.1
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
VALMONT POLE
FOUNDATION DESIGN
A−5.2
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
117.1 A & 117.1B DETAIL
A−5.3
Transmitting Antenna(s)
Radio frequency fields above this point MAY
EXCEED the FCC occupational exposure limit.
Obey all posted signs and site guidelines.
Call Verizon Wireless at 1-800-264-6620 PRIOR to
working beyond this point.
STATE:SWITCH:
SITE ID:
SECTOR/NODE:
DETAILS
A−6
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
3COMBINED PANEL ANTENNA/RRU SPECIFICATIONS
PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND CABLE SCHEDULE
1ANTENNA SCHEDULE
5RF CAUTION SIGNAGE
2NODE ID SIGNAGE
75G TOP SHROUD 6DISCONNECT
4FIBER TRAY
NOTE(S):
1. CLEAR NOTICE STICKER W/ WHITE LETTERING
2. LOCATED AT BASE OF LIGHT POLE
3. PROVIDED BY VERIZON WIRELESS
NOTE(S):
1. CLEAR STICKER W/ WHITE LETTERING
2. LOCATED AT BASE OF LIGHT POLE
3. MADE OF WEATHER AND CORROSIVE RESISTANT MATERIAL
DETAILS
A−7
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
1TYPICAL TRANSVERSE PATCH 2TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL PATCH FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT 3TYP LONGITUDINAL PATCH & OVERLAY FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
DETAILS
A−7.1
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
1TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER REPLACEMENT
4JUNCTION BOX IN CONCRETE PAD2TYPICAL PATCH FOR RIGID PAVEMENT
3UTILITY IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5SIGN MOUNTING ON SINGLE METAL POST
RF WIRING DIAGRAM
A−8
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
2NOT USED15G WIRING DIAGRAM
POWER SITE PLAN
E−1
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
1POWER SITE PLAN 1SITE PLAN
GROUNDING DIAGRAM & ONE−LINE DIAGRAM
E−2
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
1TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM2ONE LINE DIAGRAM
LEGEND
GROUNDING DETAILS
E−3
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
3GROUND BAR1GROUNDING NOTES 2CABLE GROUND KIT CONNECTIONS
6HAND HOLE
4POWER & FIBER TRENCHING
5CONDUIT ELEVATION
SHEET
REVISIONS
TITLE
GLOTEL PROJECT #:J6633
CITY OF RENTON LIGHT POLE:
1092D
ADJACENT ADDRESS:
350 WELLS AVE N
RENTON, WA 98057
KING COUNTY
NW−WA−STTRNT02−VZW
NODE 00282
>Integrity Delivered™
POWER SERVICE CABINET
E−4
1POWER SERVICE CABINET (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
Version: March 2021 5
Attachment 3
NIER Report
Radio Frequency - Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) Jurisdictional Report
Site No. TBD
NW-WA-WINONASC-00282
Wells Avenue N
Renton, Washington 98057
King County
47° 29' 18.25'' N, -122° 12' 15.61'' W NAD83
EBI Project No. 6221000702
February 25, 2021
Prepared for:
ExteNet Systems, Inc
3030 Warrenville Rd # 340
Lisle, Illinois 60532
Prepared by:
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
E B I C o n s u l t i n g
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND ANTENNA INVENTORY ................................................................. 2
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND MODELING PROCEDURE .............................................. 3
3.0 MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS ............................................................................... 4
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 5
5.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A CERTIFICATIONS
APPENDIX B FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX C RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SAFETY / SIGNAGE PLANS
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by ExteNet Systems, Inc to conduct radio
frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for ExteNet Site NW-WA-WINONASC-00282 to be
located on a light pole at Wells Avenue N in Renton, Washington to determine RF-EME exposure levels
from proposed wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix
B, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of
RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure
to RF-EME fields.
Modeling results included in this report are based on site node list dated February 18, 2021 as provided
to EBI Consulting. Subsequent changes to the drawings or site design may yield changes in the MPE levels
or FCC Compliance recommendations.
A two story building was identified approximately 20 feet from the proposed light pole and is assumed to
be accessible to the general public, including all persons not fully aware of RF hazards and who are not
trained in RF safety procedures. Since the exact height of the adjacent structure is unknown, these values
were calculated at the Maximum Antenna Face Value at a horizontal distance of 20 feet.
Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary
Location
% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit
% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
Horizontal
Approach Distance
of Occupational
Limit
Horizontal
Approach Distance
of General Public
Limit
Proposed Verizon Antennas
Maximum
Antenna
Face
Value
134.80 26.96 1.3480 N/A 3
Nearest
Walking
Surface
6.00 1.20 0.0600 N/A N/A
Ground
Level 0.55 0.11 0.0055 N/A N/A
These results are calculated based on max power assumptions for this site. The mounted antennas will
contribute the majority to these emissions. Workers accessing any equipment on the light pole should
follow all safety procedures outlined by the carrier and property owner.
Statement of Compliance
Signage recommendations are presented in Section 3.0 to bring the site into compliance with the FCC
Rules and Regulations.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346 2
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND ANTENNA INVENTORY
This project involves the installation of 3 (three) active wireless telecommunication antennas on a light
pole at Wells Avenue N in Renton, Washington. This site is located in the right of way.
The antennas are to be mounted on a light pole and operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights
mentioned below. Ant # Operator Antenna Make Antenna Model Frequency (MHz) Azimuth (deg.) Aperture (feet) Total Power Input (Watts) Antenna Gain (dBd) Total ERP (Watts) Total EIRP (Watts) 1 Verizon ERICSSON SM6701 28000 0 1.7 0.6 26.01 243.3 399.1
2 Verizon ERICSSON SM6701 28000 120 1.7 0.6 26.01 243.3 399.1
3 Verizon ERICSSON SM6701 28000 240 1.7 0.6 26.01 243.3 399.1
ID Carrier X Y Antenna Radiation
Centerline Z-Height Ground
1 Verizon 45.2 46.1 40.5 39.6
2 Verizon 44.5 44.9 40.5 39.6
3 Verizon 45.9 44.9 40.5 39.6
*Z-Height represents the distance measured from the bottom of the antenna.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346 3
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND MODELING PROCEDURE
EBI has performed theoretical modeling using Roofmaster™ software to estimate the worst-case power
density at the site antenna face and rooftop and ground-level resulting from the operation of the antennas.
Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering &
Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” (OET-65), Roofmaster™ calculates predicted power density in a
scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid
location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer
antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. Roofmaster™ models consist of the Far Field model
as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize
several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially-averaged
power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.
For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by ExteNet and compared the resultant
worst-case MPE levels to the FCC’s occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65.
The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by ExteNet and information
gathered from other sources. The parameters used for modeling are summarized in Section 1.0.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which h as an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346 4
3.0 MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS
EBI’s modeling indicates that there are no areas in front of the Verizon antennas that exceed the FCC
standards for occupational or general public exposure at ground level. All exposures above the FCC’s safe
limits require that individuals be elevated above the ground. In order to alert people accessing the light
pole blue notice signs are recommended for installation on opposite sides of the light pole, 3 feet below
the lowest antenna (36.6 feet above ground level).
To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the
active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
Access to this site is accomplished by approaching the light pole at ground level. Access to the antennas
is gained via a lift or climbing with fall protection and therefore the antennas are not considered to be
accessible to the general public.
Implementation of recommended signage in this report will bring this site into compliance with the FCC’s
rules and regulations.
Attachment 1: Signage Table
Sign Description Posting
Instructions Required Signage / Mitigation
Blue Notice Sign
Used to alert individuals that they are
entering an area where the power density
emitted from transmitting antenna(s) may
exceed the FCC’s maximum permissible
exposure limit for the general population.
Securely post on
opposite sides of the
light pole 3.0 feet below
the antennas (36.6 feet
above ground level).
2 signs posted below the antennas
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346 5
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency – Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report for the
proposed ExteNet site to be located on a light pole at Wells Avenue N in Renton, Washington.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from the proposed
antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and to ensure that site control measures are
adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements.
Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary
Location
% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit
% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit
Power
Density
(mW/cm2)
Horizontal
Approach Distance
of Occupational
Limit
Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
General Public
Limit
Proposed Verizon Antennas
Maximum
Antenna
Face
Values
134.80 26.96 1.3480 N/A 3
Nearest
Walking
Surface
6.00 1.20 0.0600 N/A N/A
Ground
Level 0.55 0.11 0.0055 N/A N/A
Workers should be informed about the presence and locations of antennas and their associated fields.
Recommended control measures are outlined in Section 3.0.
To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the
active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
Implementation of the signage recommended in this report will bring this site into compliance with the
FCC’s rules and regulations.
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of ExteNet. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted
practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same lo cale under
like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the
client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information
that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be
revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions
for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Appendix A
Certifications
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Preparer Certification
I, David Keirstead, state that:
▪ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
▪ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF-EME and would be classified “occupational” under the FCC regulations.
▪ I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal
Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation.
▪ I have been trained on RF-EME modeling using Roofmaster™ modeling software.
▪ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Appendix B
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Requirements
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of
frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
(IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon
occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for
members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/
controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental
passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see
below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Table 1 and Figure 1 (below), which are included within the FCC’s OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE
limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by
frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular
facility and are “time-averaged” limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and
uncontrolled exposures.
The FCC’s MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of 1 mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency
range.
Equipment operating in the 700 MHz frequency range has an established occupational MPE of 2.33
(mW/cm2) and a general public MPE of 0.47 mW/cm2, equipment operating in the 850 MHz frequency
range the occupational MPE is 2.83 mW/cm2 and the general public MPE is 0.57 mW/cm2, and equipment
operating in the 1900 and 2100 MHz frequency range the occupational MPE is 5 mW/cm2 and general
public MPE is 1 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Table 1: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
(V/m)
Magnetic Field
Strength (H)
(A/m)
Power Density (S)
(mW/cm2)
Averaging Time
[E]2, [H]2, or S
(minutes)
0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6
3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6
30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6
300-I,500 -- -- f/300 6
1,500-100,000 -- -- 5 6
(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency Range
(MHz)
Electric Field
Strength (E)
(V/m)
Magnetic Field
Strength (H)
(A/m)
Power Density (S)
(mW/cm2)
Averaging Time
[E]2, [H]2, or S
(minutes)
0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30
1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30
30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300-1,500 -- -- f/1,500 30
1,500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30
f = Frequency in (MHz)
* Plane-wave equivalent power density
Power Density (mW/cm2)
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for
several personal wireless services are summarized below:
Personal Wireless Service Approximate
Frequency
Occupational
MPE Public MPE
Microwave (Point-to-Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2
Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2
Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2
Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2
Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cm2
Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm2 0.58 mW/cm2
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm2 0.57 mW/cm2
Long Term Evolution (LTE) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm2 0.47 mW/cm2
Most Restrictive Frequency Range 30-300 MHz 1.00 mW/cm2 0.20 mW/cm2
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous
exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender,
size, or health.
Personal Communication Services (PCS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 1850-1990 MHz.
Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired
telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received
by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by
coaxial cables.
Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 2155-2180 MHz. Facilities
typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets); and 2) antennas that send the
wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units. Transceivers are
typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS/AWS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate
energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure
to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of
the antennas.
FCC Compliance Requirement
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Appendix C
Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Energy
Safety Information and Signage Plans
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Antenna Face Simulation
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Ground Level Simulation
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Elevation Simulation and Signage Plan
Sign Description Posting Instructions Required Signage / Mitigation
Blue Notice Sign
Used to alert individuals that they are entering an
area where the power density emitted from
transmitting antenna(s) may exceed the FCC’s
maximum permissible exposure limit for the
general population.
Securely post on opposite
sides of the light pole 3.0 feet
below the antennas (36.6 feet
above ground level).
2 signs posted below the antennas
Post on opposite
sides of the light
pole 3.0’ below the
antennas
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
RF Signage and Safety Information
RF Signage
Areas or portions of any transmitter site may be susceptible to high power densities that could cause personnel
exposures in excess of the FCC guidelines. These areas must be demarcated by conspicuously posted signage that
identifies the potential exposure. Signage MUST be viewable regardless of the viewer’s position.
GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING
This sign will inform anyone of
the basic precautions to
follow when entering an
access point to an area with
transmitting radiofrequency
equipment.
This sign indicates that RF
emissions may exceed the
FCC General Population MPE
limit.
This sign indicates that RF
emissions may exceed the
FCC Occupational MPE limit.
This sign indicates that RF
emissions may exceed at least
10x the FCC Occupational
MPE limit.
NOC INFORMATION
Information signs are used as a means to provide contact information for any questions or
concerns. They will include specific cell site identification information and the Verizon
Wireless Network Operations Center phone number.
Physical Barriers
Physical barriers are control measures that require awareness and participation of personnel. Physical barriers
are employed as an additional administration control to complement RF signage and physically demarcate an
area in which RF exposure levels may exceed the FCC General Population limit. Example: chain-connected
stanchions
Indicative Markers
Indicative markers are visible control measures that require awareness and participation of personnel, as they
cannot physically prevent someone from entering an area of potential concern. Indicative markers are employed
as an additional administration control to complement RF signage and visually demarcate an area in which RF
exposure levels may exceed the FCC General Population limit. Example: paint stripes
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Requirements
A formal adopter of FCC Standards, OSHA stipulates that those in the Occupational classification must complete
training in the following: RF Safety, RF Awareness, and Utilization of Personal Protective Equipment. OSHA also
provides options for Hazard Prevention and Control:
Hazard Prevention Control
• Utilization of good equipment
• Enact control of hazard areas
• Limit exposures
• Employ medical surveillance and accident
response
• Employ Lockout/Tag out
• Utilize personal alarms & protective
clothing
• Prevent access to hazardous locations
• Develop or operate an administrative
control program
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. TBD
EBI Project No. 6221000702 Wells Avenue N, Renton, Washington
EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 1.800.786.2346
Aerial View of Antenna Face Level Simulation
Version: March 2021 6
Attachment 4
Conduit Lease Addendum