HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v3_FINALDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Project Location Map
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
A. REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
Hearing Date: February 22, 2022
Project File Number: PR21-000210
Project Name: Crown Castle: 816039 WCF
Land Use File Number: LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Project Manager: Alex Morganroth, Senior Planner
Owner: Renton Housing Authority, 2900 NE 10th St, Renton, WA 98056
Applicant: Sally Natalino, Crown Castle, 2055 S Stearman Dr, Chandler, AZ 85286
Contact: Jennifer Taylor, Lynx Consulting, 17311 135th Ave NE, Ste A100, Woodinville, WA
98072
Project Location: 2902 NE 12th St (APN 7227802040 and 7227802041)
Project Summary: The applicant, Crown Castle (on behalf of AT&T and T-Mobile), is requesting a Hearing
Examiner Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review in order to construct a stealth
Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) at 2902 NE 12th St (7227802040). The subject
site is 61,133 square feet (1.4 acres) in size and is located in the Residential 14 du/ac
(R-14) zoning district and Residential High Density (RHD) Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Designation. The property is owned by the Renton Housing Authority. A Conditional
Use Permit was approved in April 2018 to allow RHA to operate the Sunset Multi-
Service and Career Development Center on the site (LUA18-000127). The applicant is
proposing a 99.1-foot tall ‘faux tree” WCF. The WCF, classified as a ‘stealth’ tower,
would be designed to visually mimic a coniferous tree. The purpose of the new facility
is to replace a monopole WCF previously located on an adjacent site. The total lease
area, approximately 2500 square feet., would be located to the north of the existing
building. Maintenance access to the site is proposed via an existing public alley that
connects the site to Harrington Ave NE. A gated entrance on the north side of the site
provides access to the alley. No critical areas are mapped on the project site according
to COR Maps. The applicant has proposed the removal of six (6) out of 48 total trees
on the site. The proposal includes 1,996 square feet of new or replaced impervious
surface. The applicant submitted a geotechnical report, drainage report, and
environmental checklist with the application. The Environmental Review Committee
issued a Determination of Non-Significant– Mitigated on July 12, 2021 with one (1)
mitigation measure.
Site Area: 1.4 acres
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 2 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
B. EXHIBITS:
Exhibits 1-9: As shown in the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report
Exhibit 10: Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
Exhibit 11: Duwamish Tribe Email, dated July 24, 2021
Exhibit 12: Environmental Review Committee Decision dated July 12, 2021
Exhibit 13: Tree Survey
Exhibit 14: RF Justification
Exhibit 15: Bark Example
C. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner(s) of Record: Renton Housing Authority, 2900 NE 10th St, Renton,
WA 98056
2. Zoning Classification: Residential-14 (R-14)
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential High Density (RHD)
4. Existing Site Use: Sunset Multi-Service and Career Development Center
5. Critical Areas: None
6. Neighborhood Characteristics:
a. North: Duplex; Residential-14 (R-14)
b. East: Duplex; Residential-14 (R-14)
c. South: Multifamily Residential; Center Village (CV)
d. West: Duplex; Residential-14 (R-14)
7. Site Area: 1.4 acres
D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Epstein Annexation N/A 1246 04/16/1946
Comprehensive Plan N/A 5758 06/22/2015
Zoning N/A 5758 06/22/2015
Short Plat LUA16-000960 N/A 03/01/2017
Conditional Use Permit LUA18-000127 N/A 04/10/2018
E. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Existing Utilities
a. Water: Water service to the site is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8-inch water
main in NE 12th St.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 3 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
b. Sewer: Sewer service to the site is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8-inch sewer
main in NE 12th St.
c. Surface/Storm Water: No known stormwater conveyance system is located on the site. There is a 12-
inch stormwater main in NE 12th St frontage abutting the subject property.
2. Streets: NE 12th St is classified as a Collector Arterial with an existing right of way (ROW) width of 50 feet
as measured using the King County Assessor’s Map. The existing street section contains a paved width of
approximately 39 feet with curb/gutter and 5-foot wide sidewalks on either side. A public alley is located
to the north of the site within a City-owned parcel. The parcel (APN 7227802041) is owned by the City of
Renton and was created as part of a short plat recorded in 2017 (LUA16-000960). A resolution (RES4393)
passed by the Renton City Council on November 18th, 2019 (Exhibit 9) officially designated the parcel as
a “public alley” subject to the access and maintenance standards contained in the Renton Municipal Code.
3. Fire Protection: Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA)
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b. Section 4-2-060: Zoning Use Table – Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations
2. Chapter 4 City-Wide Property Development Standards
a. Section 4-4-140: Wireless Communications Facilities
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
4. Chapter 9 Permits - Specific
a. Section 4-9-030: Conditional Use Permits
b. Section 4-9-250 Variances, Waivers, Modifications, and Alternatives
5. Chapter 11 Definitions
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element
2. Utilities Element
H. FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF):
1. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on June 6,
2021 and determined the application complete on the same day. The proejct was placed on hold on
November 30, 2021 and taken off hold on January 25, 2022. The project complies with the 120-day review
period.
2. The project site is located 2902 NE 12th St (APN 7227802040 and 7227802041).
3. The project site is currently developed with Renton Housing Authority Sunset Multi-Service and Career
Development Center.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 4 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
4. Access to the building on site would continue to be provided via two driveways off NE 12th St. Access to
the proposed WCF would be provided via a public alley abutting the northern-most portion of the site
with access to Harrington Ave NE.
5. The property is located within the Residential High Density (RHD) Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
6. The site is located within the Residential-14 (R-14) zoning classification.
7. There are approximately 48 trees located on-site, of which the applicant is proposing to retain a total of
42 trees. Three (3) trees within the existing public alley adjacent to the site are also proposed for removal.
8. No critical areas are mapped on the site.
9. No material would be cut on-site and no fill is proposed to be brought into the site. Minimal grading may
be required to provide a flat surface for the tower foundation.
10. The applicant is proposing to begin construction in spring of 2022 and end in summer of 2022.
11. Staff received no public comment letters.
12. Staff received one (1) comment from the Duwamish Tribe related to the discovery of native artifacts. The
Tribe indicated that they did not have concerns with the proposal as artifacts are unlikely to be found in
the area.
13. Pursuant to the City of Renton’s Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on
July 12, 2021, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance –
Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Sunset WCF Monopine (Exhibit 12). The DNS-M included one mitigation
measure. A 14-day appeal period commenced on July 12, 2021 and ended on July 26, 2021. No appeals of
the threshold determination have been filed as of the date of this report.
14. Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance – Mitigated:
a. The applicant shall improve the portion of the public alley (APN 7227802041) extending north from
the project site with a length of approximately 250 feet per the City of Renton street standards
contained in RMC 4-6-060. The final design and extent of the alley improvements shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Plan Reviewer at the time for Civil Construction Permit review.
15. Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and
the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
16. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: The site is designated Residential High Density (RHD) on the City’s
Comprehensive Plan Map. The purpose of the RHD designation is to allow a variety of single-family and
multi-family development types, with continuity created through the application of design guidelines, the
organization of roadways, sidewalks, public spaces, and the placement of community gathering places
and civic amenities. The proposal is compliant with the following Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies
if all conditions of approval are met:
Compliance Comprehensive Plan Analysis
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 17
and 18 are
met
Policy U‐79. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be
accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and
adjacent land uses.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 5 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Staff Comment: See analysis below under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standard
Compliance and FOF 18, Conditional Use Standards. If conditions of approval are met
the proposed stealth tower WCF would meet the policy objective.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 17
and 18 are
met
Policy U‐80. Require wireless communication structures and towers to be designed and
site to minimize aesthetic impacts and to be co-located on existing structures and
towers wherever possible.
Staff Comment: See analysis below under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standard
Compliance and FOF 18, Conditional Use Standards. If conditions of approval are met
the proposed stealth tower WCF would meet the policy objective.
✓
Goal L-P: Minimize adverse impacts to natural systems, and address impacts of past
practice where feasible, through leadership, policy, regulation, and regional
coordination.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 17
and 18 are
met
Goal L-BB: Maintain a high quality of life as Renton grows by ensuring that new
development is designed to be functional and attractive.
Staff Comment: See analysis below under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standard
Compliance and FOF 18, Conditional Use Standards. If conditions of approval are met
the proposed stealth tower WCF would meet the policy objective.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 17
and 18 are
met
Goal L-FF: Strengthen the visual identity of Renton and its Community Planning Areas
and neighborhoods through quality design and development.
Staff Comment: See analysis below under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standard
Compliance and FOF 18, Conditional Use Standards. If conditions of approval are met
the proposed stealth tower WCF would meet the policy objective.
17. Zoning Development Standard Compliance: The site is located in the Residential-14 (R-14) zone. The
purpose of the (R-14) is to encourage development, and redevelopment, of residential neighborhoods that
provide a mix of detached and attached dwelling structures organized and designed to combine
characteristics of both typical single-family and small-scale multi-family developments. Structure size is
intended to be limited in terms of bulk and scale so that the various unit types allowed in the zone are
compatible with one another and can be integrated together into a quality neighborhood. Project features
are encouraged, such as yards for private use, common open spaces, and landscaped areas that enhance
a neighborhood and foster a sense of community. Civic and limited commercial uses may be allowed when
they support the purpose of the designation. All new wireless communication facilities are required to
meet the standards and requirements in RMC 4-4-140 in lieu of the typical development standards based
on zoning designation.
Compliance Wireless Communication Facility Standards Analysis
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is met
a. Equipment Shelters/Cabinets:
Location - Equipment shelters and cabinets used to house related equipment
should be located within buildings or placed underground, unless it is infeasible.
Screening - Equipment shelters and cabinets shall be surrounded by a fifteen
foot (15') wide sight obscuring landscape buffer around the outside perimeter of
required security fencing with a minimum height that is no less than the height
of the compound fence at any point. Existing topography, vegetation and other
site characteristics may provide relief from the screening requirement
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 6 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Size - The applicant shall provide documentation that the size of any equipment
shelters or cabinets is the minimum necessary to meet the provider’s service
needs.
Generators –
i. Architectural integration is required (if applicable).
ii. To the extent feasible, generators shall be enclosed along with the related
equipment. Similar to equipment shelters, the screening for the generator
shall utilize similar building materials, colors, accents, and textures as the
primary building; if no buildings exist on site, ensure that the building is
designed to blend in with the environment.
iii. A screening wall and/or landscaping material shall be required to mitigate
visual impacts.
iv. Fences shall be constructed of materials that complement and blend in with
the surroundings.
v. Anti-graffiti finish shall be applied to all solid fences, walls, and gates.
vi. A noise analysis shall be required to demonstrate that the generator will
operate within allowed noise limits if the generator is the sole power source.
Staff Comment: The associated cabinet equipment would be located on the north side
of the existing building on the site. The proposed cabinet area would be
approximately 2,500 square feet. in size and would include a 6-foot high solid wood
fence around the perimeter, with a gate on the north side for maintenance access.
According to the applicant, the equipment cabinet was not able to be located within
the existing building due to the current owner utilizing the entire building and
prohibitive distance between the building and base of the proposed stealth tower.
The cabinet would be located approximately 300 feet from the NE 12th St public right-
of-way (ROW) and is positioned behind (north of) the existing building which
significantly reduces the visual impact of the enclosure. In addition, multiple
structures are located between the location of the proposed equipment enclosure
and the NE 13th St ROW. The applicant has proposed the installation of nineteen (19)
Compact strawberry trees around the fence perimeter to help mitigate the visual
impact through natural screening. While the proposed plantings would provide a
moderate level of screening between the lease area and the residential uses to the
north, east, and west, the short stature and canopy shape would provide only a
moderate level of screening. The provision of additional larger stature, native
evergreen landscaping around the perimeter of the enclosure would provide a more
robust visual screen between the equipment enclosure and the neighboring
residential uses to the north, east, and west. Therefore, staff recommends, as a
condition of approval, the applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan showing
sight-obscuring native trees around all four (4) sides of the equipment enclosure
perimeter. The applicant shall utilize trees that grow to a large size at maturity and
may include species such as Western Red Cedar, Douglas Fir, or an alternative native
species The detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
✓
b. Maximum Height: The maximum height of wireless communication facilities in all
zones is governed by RMC 4-4-140F, which limits the height of stealth towers to 150
feet. The allowed height of for specific types of stealth facilities shall be determined
through the Conditional Use Permit reviews process and specific standards in the
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 7 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
section for “faux trees”. Per RMC 4-4-140.I, a faux tree may exceed the average
height of nearby trees by no more than twenty percent (20%) or thirty feet (30'),
whichever is greater.
Staff Comment: The applicant has proposed a faux tree stealth tower with a total
maximum height of 99.1 feet. Per the Tree Survey (Exhibit 13) submitted by the
applicant, the 37 trees nearest to the proposed location of the stealth tower have an
average height of 69.1 feet and range from 30 feet to 102 feet tall. Therefore, based
on the specific standards for faux trees in RMC 4-4-140.I.1, a faux tree stealth tower
would be allowed up to a maximum height of 99.1 feet (69.1 feet + 30 feet = 99.1
feet) or 82.9 feet (69.1 + (69.1*.2)) ,whichever is greater. The applicant has proposed
a 99.1-foot tall WCF, as measured to the high point of the structure (including the
faux foliage). The highest antennas are located on the structure at a height of
approximately 90 feet. Therefore, the WCF complies with the maximum height
standard.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is met
c. Visual Impact: RMC 4-4-140F.3 requires that site location and development
preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and landscape to
the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Towers
shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing
characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be
preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be
minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less adverse visual impact to the
surrounding area. Towers, antennas and related equipment shall be uniformly
painted a non-reflective neutral color that best matches the colors within the
immediately surrounding built and natural landscape in order to reduce the contrast
between the WCF and the landscape.
Staff Comment: The proposed faux tree stealth tower, which is designed to visually
imitate a coniferous tree, is located approximately 150 feet away from the nearest
public ROW (NE 13th St) within an existing grouping of trees ranging in height for 30
feet to 71.5 feet (Exhibit 12). At 99.1 feet tall, the proposed faux tree clearly stands
out from the existing trees as documented by the photo-simulations (Exhibit 5)
submitted by the applicant. Although less visually impactful than a standard,
uncamouflaged monopole, the proposed stealth tower would stand out significantly
due to its sheer size and location adjacent to a residential neighborhood with building
heights typically only reaching two or three stories. While the branches on the middle
and upper portions of the tree serve to reduce the overall visual impact when viewed
from afar, the illusion is less effective when viewed from closer to the facility due to
the type of finish used on the main support pole. In order to better approximate the
look of a real tree, the main support pole should include design elements that help it
blend in with the other trees on the site. Therefore, in order to further reduce the
visual impact of the tree when viewed from nearby properties, staff recommends, as
a condition of approval, the applicant shall incorporate a textured finish or cladding
system, such as the Larson Ultraflex bark offered by Valmont Structures, on the main
support pole that imitates the look of natural tree park (Exhibit 15). The applicant
shall submit a physical sample of the proposed finish to be reviewed and approved
by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
The associated equipment enclosure would include a six (6’) foot tall wood fence
installed around the perimeter which is consistent with the type screening used for
at- grade utility or mechanical equipment. The location of the enclosure near the back
of the site within a vegetated area would create a negligible visual impact on the
adjacent properties and would not look out of place on a commercial site. In addition,
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 8 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
the recommended condition under criterion ‘a’ above would require the applicant to
install additional landscape elements around the perimeter of the enclosure which
would further reduce the visual impact to adjacent properties.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is met
d. Setbacks: RMC 4-4-140F.4 requires that towers be set back from each property
line by a distance equal to the tower height, unless an engineering analysis concludes
that a reduced setback is safe for abutting properties and the Administrator
determines that a reduced setback is appropriate for the site.
Staff Comment: The applicant has proposed a 68-foot setback from north property
line (public alley), a 20-foot setback from the west property line, a 34-foot setback
from the east property line, and a 230-foot setback from the south property line (NE
12th St). According to the applicant, the tower cannot be located further from the
property lines due to siting constraints created by the triangle-shape of the site and
the location of the existing building to the south of the tower. Staff concurs that a
reduced setback from the south property line is appropriate and necessary for the
proposed stealth tower, but in order to ensure that the reduced setback is safe for
abutting properties, staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant shall
submit an engineering analysis prepared by a professional engineer that makes a
specific finding confirming the reduced setback for the structure is safe. The analysis
shall be submitted at the time of building permit application for review and approval
by the City’s structural engineer.
✓
e. Maximum Noise Levels: RMC 4-4-140F.5 limits the noise of equipment associated
with Wireless Communication Facilities to forty five (45) decibels as measured from
the nearest property line on which the facility is located.
Staff Comment: The applicant has stated in their project narrative that they do not
anticipate any changes in the noise levels. If noise levels exceed the maximum decibel
limit, the applicant would be required to bring the proposed facility into compliance
with code. No generators are proposed as part of the project.
✓
e. Fencing: RMC 4-4-040 limits fences and retaining walls within residential zoning
districts to a maximum height of 6 feet. In front yard or secondary front yard
setbacks, fences and retaining walls shall not exceed a maximum height of 4 feet. In
addition, RMC 4-4-140F.6 requires the installation of security fencing coated with a
non-reflective neutral color.
Staff Comment: The solid wood fencing with double swing gate proposed around the
equipment area would have a maximum height of six (6) feet above grade and would
therefore be compliant with the fence standards in RMC 4-4-040 and RMC 4-4-
140F.6.C.
✓
f. Lighting: RMC 4-4-140F.7 prohibits the artificial lighting of towers or antennas,
unless required by the FAA or other authority.
Staff Comment: No new lighting is proposed as a part of the proposed WCF.
✓
g. Advertising Prohibited: RMC 4-4-140F.8 prohibits the placement of advertising
on any part of the Wireless Communication Facility or associated equipment.
Staff Comment: The applicant has not proposed any type of advertising to be
included on the WCF.
h. Building Standards: RMC 4-4-140F.9 requires support structures to be constructed
so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries
Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision G
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 9 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Compliance
not yet
demonstrate
Standard. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided
with an engineer’s certification that the support structure’s design meets or exceeds
those standards.
Staff Comment: The structural integrity of the proposed WCF will be evaluated via
engineering analysis at the time of building permit application.
✓
i. Radio Frequency Standards: RMC 4-4-140F.10 requires the applicant to ensure
that the Wireless Communication Facility will not cause localized interference with
the reception of area television or radio broadcasts.
Staff Comment: The applicant does not anticipate any inference with the reception
of the area television or radio broadcasts and would be required to immediately
address any interference issues should they be reported.
Compliant if
conditions of
approval are
met
j. Stealth Tower Standards (Faux Trees)
a. Location: Faux trees shall be located within one hundred feet (100') of existing
trees, unless photo simulations show, to the Administrator’s satisfaction, that the
proposed faux tree would be appropriate for the site.
b. Height: The faux tree may exceed the average height of nearby trees by no more
than twenty percent (20%) or thirty feet (30'), whichever is greater.
c. Authenticity: Faux trees shall replicate the shape, structure, and color of live trees
common to the area. Plans shall provide detailed specifications regarding the
number and spacing of branches, bark, foliage, and colors. All faux trees shall
incorporate a sufficient number of branches (no less than three (3) branches per
linear foot of height) and design materials (e.g., faux bark) so that the structure
appears as natural in appearance as feasible. Branches shall not be required for the
lowest twenty feet (20') of the trunk.
d. Concealment:
i. All cables and antennas shall be painted to match the color of the trunk.
ii. Antenna socks are mandatory for all antennas (and similar components)
located on a faux tree.
Staff Comment:
Location – The applicant submitted a tree survey (Exhibit 13) with the application that
documents the presence of approximately fourteen (14) trees within 100 feet of the
proposed faux tree stealth tower.
Height - The proposed faux tree stealth tower would have a maximum height of 99.1
feet. A tree survey (Exhibit 13) submitted by the applicant documented approximately
37 trees within 400 feet of the tower base ranging from 30 feet to 100 feet tall.
According to the applicant, only trees classified as significant per RMC 4-11-200 were
documented, which staff confirmed. The applicant calculated an average height of
69.1 feet for the 37 trees included in the analysis. Based on the calculated average,
the faux tree WCF would be allowed a maximum height of 99.1 feet (69.1 feet + 30
feet = 99.1 feet) or 98.9 feet (69.1 feet + (69.1*.2)), whichever is greater.
Authenticity – The applicant has proposed a stealth tower designed to imitate the
look of a coniferous tree. According to the applicant, the manufacturer of the tree,
Valmont, utilizes branches ranging in length from four (4’) feet to ten (10’) feet which
would be installed on the main support pole starting approximately 20 feet above
grade. However, the plans submitted by the applicant (Exhibit 4) show the branches
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 10 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
18. Conditional Use Analysis: Per RMC 4-2-060 Zoning Use Table, stealth towers are permitted in the R-14
zoning district with an approved administrative Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Per RMC 4-8-070.J, for
permits subject to different types of permit review procedures, all the associated applications are subject
to the highest level of review authority that applies to any of the required applications. Based on the overall
height of the proposed WCF (99.1 feet), which exceeds 60 feet, a Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review
application was required. Therefore the associated CUP is subject to review and a decision by the Hearing
Examiner. In lieu of the criteria normally evaluated for Conditional Use Permits, the following criteria in
RMC 4-9-030E shall be considered in determining whether to issue a Conditional Use Permit for a wireless
communication facility.
Compliance Conditional Use Analysis for Wireless Facilities
a. Height and Design of the Proposed Tower: The height of the proposed tower and/or
antenna as well as incorporation of design characteristics that have the effect of
reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness.
Staff Comment: The proposed faux tree stealth tower would utilize a design intended to
blend in with the surrounding environment, which includes deciduous and coniferous
trees ranging from 30 feet to 100 feet in height. With a proposed maximum height of
starting approximately 18 feet above grade. In addition, although the applicant notes
the spacing in the project narrative, the submitted plans do not appear to document
whether or not the spacing meets the code required three (3) branches per linear foot
of height. Providing the required density of branches will ensure the tree effectively
mimics the appearance of a real tree. Therefore, staff recommends, as a condition of
approval, the applicant shall submit an updated construction plan set and photo
simulations that clearly documents the code-required branch density as well as shows
the branches installed down to a minimum of 18 feet above grade. The updated plan
set and photo simulations shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. In addition, to ensure the faux tree
blends into the natural environment, staff recommends, as condition of approval, the
applicant shall utilize a design that mimics a tree species native to western
Washington including for structure features such as faux bark, branches, and needles.
The tree species utilized for the design shall be reviewed and approved by Current
Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. An additional
recommended condition of approval under criterion ‘a’ above would require the
applicant to utilize a cladding or textured materials to mimic the look of bark on the
main support pole (i.e. trunk). See FOF 18 and 19 for additional analysis related to
the design of the stealth tower
Concealment – According to the applicant, all items affixed to the exterior of the
tower would be painted to ensure they blend with the structure, however, no further
details were included. In addition, antenna socks were not shown on the plan set
(Exhibit 4) or photo simulations (Exhibit 5) submitted with the application. Therefore,
staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant shall incorporate
antenna socks with realistic faux foliage on all antennas. In addition, the applicant
shall paint all other cabling and equipment on the stealth tower brown or green
depending on location in order better blend into the environment. All future new or
swapped equipment on the stealth tower shall also utilize antenna socks with faux
foliage, regardless of the carrier. The antenna sock specifications shall be reviewed
and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit
issuance.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 11 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
met
99.1 feet, the stealth tower would incorporate antennas for two (2) different wireless
carriers (AT&T and T-Mobile according to the applicant) at RAD heights of
approximately 80 feet above grade and 90 above grade. The plan set also shows space
for a third antenna array at approximately 70 feet above grade that is intended to be
utilized by a future carrier. According to the applicant, the height proposed is the
minimum necessary to avoid signal blockage created by the area topography, achieve
RF line of sight required for adequate service/coverage, and to allow an additional
carrier to collocate on the tower due to the separation between antennas required.
While designing the facility to mimic a tree will help reduce the visual impact of the
structure, the 99.1-foot overall height of the structure is greater than the height of the
majority of nearby trees and is significantly taller than the existing two and three story-
buildings on adjacent properties, thereby creating a structure that stands out visually.
Staff has recommended conditions of approval related to the design of the structure
under FOF 16 and 17 intended to produce a stealth tower that better visually
approximates a live tree and therefore reduces the visual obtrusiveness of the structure.
Staff concurs that the design and height of the proposed tower is appropriate as it
relates to both the character of the surrounding area as well as the needs of the
applicant. However, the plan set (Exhibit 4) current shows antennas associated with the
top-most antennas extending beyond the ends of the faux branches and thereby
reduces the visual effectiveness of the faux tree stealth tower. Therefore, staff
recommends, as a condition of approval, no part of the equipment mounted on the
stealth tower support pole shall extend beyond the faux lateral branches, unless an
alternative concealment method is approved by the Current Planning Project Manager.
The applicant shall submit an updated plan set and photo simulations showing the
updated design to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit issuance.
✓
b. Proximity of The Tower to Residential Structures And Residential District
Boundaries: The nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties and the proximity
of the tower and/or antenna to residential structures and residential district
boundaries.
Staff Comment: The site of the proposed tower is located in the Residential-14 (R-14)
zoning district and is adjacent to both single-family and multi-family residential uses.
According to the applicant, sites closer to residential areas are more valuable for
carriers than remote sites or industrial areas due to customer demand and the potential
for growth. The broader neighborhood to the north of site is dominated by residential
multi-family, residential single-family, and civic uses such as schools, churches, and
social organizations. While locating within a residential area is not preferred from a
visual perspective, growth in residential areas is the primary driver of cellular service
demand and therefore, represents an efficient area for carriers to locate their
equipment, according to the applicant. As indicated in the RF justification (Exhibit 14)
submitted by the applicant on behalf of AT&T, the carrier to be located at the highest
point on the tower, a substantial coverage gap exists in the greater Sunset area
stretching from NE 4th St to May Creek Park. In addition, according to the RF Justification
submitted by the applicant on behalf of T-Mobile (Exhibit 14), who would be collocating
on the tower below AT&T’s equipment, the tower location is necessary as it will replace
an existing T-Mobile-owned monopole south of the project site along NE Sunset Blvd
that will be removed as part of the site’s redevelopment. According to the applicant,
residential growth in the area has put a strain on the existing towers in the area and
the proposed tower would alleviate pressure on both networks due to its location
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 12 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
between an underdeveloped residential neighborhood and fast-growing commercial
area.
While the tower is in close proximity to residential uses, staff concurs with the applicant
that the location of the proposed stealth tower is optimal due to its proximity to an area
experiencing significant residential and commercial growth. The applicant has proposed
a faux tree stealth tower designed to blend into the environment, which once
constructed, would provide higher quality cellular service to residents while blending
into the environment through the use of a high quality design. In addition, recommend
conditions by staff related to the design, if approved, would further serve to reduce the
overall visual obtrusiveness of the facility.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 17
and 18 are
met
c. Nature of Uses On Adjacent and Nearby Properties: The nature of uses on adjacent
and nearby properties. The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in
substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property.
Staff Comment: The proposed faux tree is located on the periphery of a commercial
corridor concentrated along NE Sunset Blvd that is currently experiencing rapid
redevelopment and investment by both the City and private entities. The development
is expected to generate additional demand for cellular service in the immediate area,
according to the applicant. Wireless facilities are typically found in or adjacent to
commercial areas due to the high demand generated by uses such as apartment
buildings, shopping centers, and offices and do not result in substantial or undue
adverse effects if integrated into the urban form through various camouflaging or
screening methods. Directly north of the site is established residential neighborhood
likely to see considerable redevelopment in the medium to long-term based on current
market conditions that would result in an increase in housing units and therefore,
cellular service demand. As discussed above under FOF 18.b, the proposed stealth tower
is not anticipated to result in substantial or undue adverse impacts on the residential
uses to adjacent to the site if all conditions of approval related to design of the tower
are met.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval
under FOF
17.a is met
d. Topography and Vegetation: The surrounding topography and tree canopy
coverage.
Staff Comment: No significant grading is proposed as a result of this project as the site
is primarily flat. Vegetative impacts are anticipated within two (2) areas including the
pad used to support the ground cabinet equipment and support pole base as well as the
public alley to the north of the site to be used for maintenance access. The area near
the equipment base would result in a 50-foot by 50-foot square foot area of vegetation
cleared, including six (6) trees (Exhibit 4). The trees proposed for removal include two
(2) 10-inch Maples, a 24-inch Maple, a 24-inch Madrona, an 8-inch Maple, and a 10-
inch Madrona. Improving a portion of the alley (APN 7227802041) to the north, as
required as part of the mitigation measure in the SEPA decision (Exhibit 12), requires
the removal of three (3) deciduous trees approximately 28, 32, and 36 inches in
diameter. The applicant has proposed mitigating the removal of the trees by planting
nineteen (19) Compact strawberry trees around the equipment enclosure. Compact
strawberry trees are short in stature and typically only grow to a maximum height of
eight (8’) to ten (10’) feet. In order provide a taller, higher quality visual buffer around
facility, staff has recommended a condition of approval under FOF 17, Zoning
Development Standard Compliance, Equipment Enclosure, requiring the provision of
larger native trees.
e. Ingress/Egress: The proposed ingress and egress.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 13 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Compliant if
SEPA
Mitigation
Measure is
complied
with
Staff Comment: Vehicular access to the building on the site would remain via two (2)
existing driveways off of NE 12th St. No changes are proposed to the existing primary
vehicular access to the project site. For installation and maintenance of the equipment,
the applicant is proposing to utilize the partially improved public alley on the parcel to
the north of the site. The parcel (APN 7227802041) is owned by the City of Renton and
was created as part of a short plat recorded in 2017 (LUA16-000960). A resolution
(RES4393) passed by the Renton City Council on November 18th, 2019 (Exhibit 9)
officially designated the parcel as a “public alley” subject to the access and
maintenance standards contained in the Renton Municipal Code. The intent of the
resolution was to ensure consistency with the Sunset Area Community Planned Action,
which designates the parcel as intended for alley use or a green space connection. The
portion of the alley extending directly north of the WCF, or approximately 250 linear
feet, is currently overgrown with brush, shrubs, and various vegetation. The applicant
has proposed to remove vegetation, including two (2) significant trees and one (1)
landmark tree, and install gravel in order to allow vehicular access. To ensure the
portion of the alley proposed to be improved by the applicant complies with the City of
Renton street standards, the Environmental Review Committee added a mitigation
measure to the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued on July 12, 2021
(Exhibit 12). The mitigation measure requires the applicant to pave approximately 250
linear feet of the alley extending north from project site. Once paved, the alley would
provide adequate ingress and egress to the site for the installation and maintenance of
the facility. Therefore, the proposal will retain adequate ingress and egress for the
Sunset Multiuse Center as well as create ingress and egress for the stealth tower near
the rear of the site.
✓
f. Impacts: The potential noise, light, glare, and visual impacts.
Staff Comment: The impacts of light, glare, and noise are not anticipated to be above
what would be expected and permitted in the R-14 zone. The facility will not include a
generator and will not include any exterior lights. See FOF 17, Zoning Development
Standards Compliance and FOF 18, Conditional Use Analysis for additional discussion
and analysis related to visual impacts.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is
met
g. Colocation Feasibility: The availability of suitable existing towers and other
structures to accommodate the proposal.
Staff Comment: The applicant submitted satisfactory evidence that no existing tower
or support structure can accommodate the proposed equipment relocation. AT&T, one
of the two (2) carriers that will install equipment on the stealth tower, currently does
not have any facilities in the Sunset area (Exhibit 14). The other carrier to locate on the
stealth tower, T-Mobile, will be removing a monopole on an adjacent parcel south of
NE 12th St due to redevelopment of the site. Relocating to the new tower would ensure
T-Mobile continues to have the ability to provide reliable service to customers in the
area. According to the applicant, a lack of existing towers in the Sunset area, lack of tall
buildings or other structures that could support antennas, and an increase in the
number housing units in the neighborhood, necessitate the installation of a new
standalone wireless facility. Staff reviewed the applicants colocation feasibility
justification and concurs that no other suitable towers or structures are available in the
surrounding area. According to the applicant, an additional third colocation
opportunity is available for another wireless carrier to install equipment on the
proposed stealth tower. In order to ensure both the tower and the equipment enclosure
can support an additional carrier based on the proposed design, staff recommends, as
a condition of approval, the applicant shall provide a letter from a professional RF
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 14 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
engineer demonstrating that future collocation of at least one other wireless carrier is
feasible based on the existing site characteristics and design of the proposed monopole
and associated equipment enclosure. The letter shall be submitted to the Current
Planning Project Manager for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF 16,
17 are met
j. Consistency With Plans And Regulations: The compatibility with the general
purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, this Title, and any
other City plan, program, map or ordinance.
Staff Comment: As previously discussed above under FOF 16 and 17 the proposed
installation of the proposed stealth tower is consistent with the City’s adopted
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and RMC 4-4-140 Wireless Communication
Facilities regulations provided the conditions of approval is complied with.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval
under FOF
17.a is met
k. Landscaping: Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties
from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use.
Staff Comment: All cabinet equipment would be screened with six (6’) foot tall wood
fence around the perimeter, which is consistent with the type of fencing typically found
in residential neighborhood. In addition, existing mature trees are located between the
cabinet and adjacent property and would provide a moderate level of screening when
viewed from both the adjacent property and the ROW. The applicant has also proposed
the installation of 19 Compact strawberry trees that would provide additional screening
around the enclosure. Staff recommended a condition of approval under FOF 17, Zoning
Development Standards; Equipment Enclosure that would require the applicant to
utilize larger, native trees in lieu of the proposed trees. Once planted, the trees
combined with the wood fence around the perimeter would sufficiently screen the
equipment cabinets from adjacent properties and mitigate adverse effects of the
proposed use.
19. Site Plan Review: Pursuant to RMC 4-9-200.B, Site Plan Review is required for all development in the R-14
zone. A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner shall be required for proposals of large project scale
pursuant to RMC 4-9-200D.b., which includes a structure greater than four (4) stories or sixty feet (60’) in
height. The following table contains project elements that comply with Site Plan Review criteria set forth
in RMC 4-9-200E.3:
Compliance Site Plan Criteria and Analysis
✓
a. Comprehensive Plan Compliance and consistency.
Staff Comment: See previous discussion under FOF 16, Comprehensive Plan Analysis.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
Under FOF 17
are Met
b. Zoning Compliance and Consistency.
Staff Comment: See discussion under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standard
Compliance.
N/A
c. Design Regulation Compliance and Consistency.
Staff Comment: The project is not located in an Urban Design District designation.
N/A
d. Planned action ordinance and Development agreement Compliance and
Consistency.
Staff Comment: Not applicable.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 15 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Compliant if
SEPA
Mitigation
Measure is
complied with
and all
conditions of
approval are
compmlied
with
e. Off Site Impacts.
Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development
on a particular portion of the site.
Staff Comment: The proposed WCF structure would be located near the rear (north) of
the site approximately 42.5 feet from the existing one-story office building located on
the site. No other WCF facilities are present on the site. While significantly taller than
the other structures in the surrounding neighborhood, the unique nature of the
structure, which is designed to blend into the natural environment, significantly
mitigates the visual impact of the overall bulk of the structure. As compared to other
WCF monopole facilities constructed in other areas of the City, the proposed stealth
tower does not represent an overscale structure. In addition, the area of the site where
the lease area would be located is on an undeveloped area of the site and therefore,
would not result in an overconcentration of development. See FOF 17 and FOF 18
above for additional analysis related to visual impacts created by the scale of the
structure.
Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets,
walkways and adjacent properties.
Staff Comment: A five-foot wide sidewalk is located along the NE 12th street frontage
near the site that allows pedestrians to safely access the site. In addition, an onsite
sidewalk provides a protected, dedicated pedestrian route from the public sidewalk to
the front entrance of the building. No changes to pedestrian circulation are proposed
as part of the project. Vehicular connections to adjacent properties are not currently
present due to the existing development pattern. Pedestrian connections to adjacent
properties are provided via the public sidewalk along NE 12th St. In addition, an existing
concrete walkway extends from the onsite walkway near the front entrance to the
public alley to the north of the site. No changes to the concrete walkway are proposed
as a result of the project.
The applicant is proposing to utilize the partially improved public alley on the parcel to
the north of the site in order to access the proposed WCF for installation and
maintenance of the equipment. As part of the SEPA Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee (Exhibit 12), a
mitigation measure was included that requires the applicant to improve the portion of
the public alley extending north from the project site approximately 250 feet.
Improving the alley section to City of Renton street standards represents a significant
step towards improving the entire alley which will be used by future development for
access. While the project does create an additional connection, it improves an existing
connection that will be important and beneficial for future development in the
adjacent neighborhood to the north.
Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities,
rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from
surrounding properties.
Staff Comment: Due to the type of use in the existing building, primarily office space,
no dedicated loading or storage areas are present on the site. In addition, no new
loading or storage areas are proposed as part of the project. The 2,500-square foot
lease area for the proposed WCF, which will house both the monopine support
structure and associated cabinet equipment, will be screened by a six (6’) foot tall fully
obscuring wood fence. Outside of the fence, the applicant has proposed the installation
of 19 Compact strawberry trees in order to provide additional screening of the
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 16 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
enclosure. In order to provide a more robust visual buffer around the enclosure, staff
recommended a condition of approval under FOF 17, Zoning Development Standards
Compliance, Equipment Enclosure, that the applicant be required to utilize a larger
native tree species such as standard Western red cedar, Douglas fir, or an alternative.
If approved, the condition of approval would result in minimizing the visual impact of
the lease area equipment enclosure to surrounding properties. The enclosure is not
visible from any public ROWs.
Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual
accessibility to attractive natural features.
Staff Comment: Due to the location of the site within a fully-developed neighborhood,
limited meaningful natural features are present on or near the site. Views of Mt Rainier
are available to some properties south of the NE 12th St ROW, but are limited to the
north of NE 12th St due to the relatively flat topography of the surrounding
neighborhood. The proposed WCF is of similar size and height of trees scattered
through the neighborhood and would not significantly impact the visual accessibility
to natural features in or outside the immediate area.
Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between developments and
surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally
enhance the appearance of the project.
Staff Comment: Due to the height of the proposed WCF, the installation of additional
landscaping would not significantly reduce the visual impact of the main monopine
pole structure. Existing trees on the site (Exhibit 4) provide a moderate level of
screening and help camouflage the proposed monopine, which is designed to have
characteristics of an evergreen tree. The applicant has also proposed the installation
of additional trees around the lease area space, which would contain both the main
monopine support structure and the associated equipment. As discussed above other
sections of this report, staff has recommended a condition of approval requiring the
installation of larger, native trees in lieu of the species proposed. If complied with, the
condition would result in landscaping that will provide a higher quality transition to
the neighboring properties and increase the overall appearance of the project at
ground level.
Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid
excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets.
Staff Comment: No lighting is proposed as part of the project.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval
under FOF
18,
Conditional
Use Analysis
are met
f. On Site Impacts.
Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building
placement, spacing and orientation.
Staff Comment: No new buildings are proposed as part of the project. The proposed
unmanned WCF structure would be located near the rear of the site and is not
anticipated to produce any noise or result in any privacy issues for the existing use on
the site.
Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to
natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and
pedestrian and vehicle needs.
Staff Comment: Due to the small footprint of the proposed WCF, the horizontal scale
of the structure is not anticipated to impact the existing on-site structure or associated
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 17 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
amenities. Although significantly taller than the existing one-story structure on the
site, the overall structure envelope is significantly smaller than that of a building with
a similar height, and impacts from the verticality of the structure are not anticipated
to be any greater than a typical large stature tree. See additional discussion under the
review criteria in FOF 18, Conditional Use Permit Analysis.
Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation
and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting
impervious surfaces.
Staff Comment: The Plan Set (Exhibit 4) submitted by the applicant identifies a total of
48 existing trees on the project site. The applicant has proposed the removal of six (6)
trees within the 50 feet by 50 feet lease area ranging from 10-inches to 24-inch DBH,
resulting in a tree retention rate of 87.5%. Therefore the proposal complies with the
tree retention standards in RMC 4-4-130.H.ii, which requires that at least 20% of trees
be retained for development in the R-14 zone. No landmark trees are proposed for
removal on the site and other trees in the immediate area would be protected per City
of Renton tree protection standards during construction. In addition, the applicant has
also proposed the removal of three (3) deciduous trees approximately 28, 32, and 36
inches in diameter within the partially improved public alley to the north (APN
7227802041) that will be used to access the site for maintenance. Per 4-4-130.C.12,
tree removal for the expansion of public roads or other ROW or easement
improvements is allowed, unless critical areas would be effective. Therefore, removal
of the trees in the alley in order pave the alley qualifies as an allowed tree removal
activity. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, no significant grading would occur
as a result of the project. In addition, no significant natural features are present on the
site, which is already developed with an existing building and associated surface
parking lot.
Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to
provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and
generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the
design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage
from vehicles or pedestrian movements.
Staff Comment: See landscaping discussion and analysis above under FOF 17, Zoning
Development Standards Compliance, Equipment Shelters, and FOF 18, Conditional Use
Analysis; Landscaping, and FOF 19; Site Plan Review Analysis, Off-site Impacts.
✓
g. Access
Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage
streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and
egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties.
Staff Comment: The building on the site is currently accessed via two (2) driveways
off of NE 12th St, classified as a Collector Arterial road. No changes to access to the
main bulding are proposed as a result of the project. Vehicles accessing the site for
maintainance of the proposed WCF would utilize the existing public alley to the north
of the site, elimnating the need for a large trucks or cranes to use NE 12 th St for
ingress/egress. Due to the nature of the adajcent uses and type of project proposed,
consolidation of ingress and egress points with adjacents was determined by staff to
be infeasible. If the project site or adjacent sites redevelop in the future, consolidtion
of access points would be re-evaluated at that time.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 18 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation
system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian
access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency
access ways.
Staff Comment: The design of the existing surface parking lot and pedestrian walkway
system on the site provides high quality internal circulation. The proposed WCF would
not impact circulation on the site, as all maintenance vehicles serving the facility would
access the site from the public alley to the north of the site. In addition, the existing
pedestrian walkway connecting the alley to parking lot in front of the building would
not be impacted by construction of the WCF or associated equipment enclosure.
Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and
pedestrian areas.
Staff Comment: Due to the nature of the existing use on the site, general office space,
a separate loading and delivery area is not present on the site. The proposed new use
on the site, the WCF, would not necessitate any type of deliveries and as discussed
above, maintenance vehicles will access the site via the existing public alley which is
separate from the pedestrian and vehicular parking areas on the south side of the site.
Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access.
Staff Comment: No new trips would be generated by the proposed use and no impacts
to transit facilities would occur after project completion.
Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking
areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties.
Staff Comment: See “Circulation” under criterion ‘e’ above for analysis. regarding the
existing pedestrian connections both on and off the site.
✓
h. Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal
points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the
occupants/users of the site.
Staff Comment: Due to the nature of the proposed use, a WCF, no new open space is
proposed as part of the project. The project site contains an existing courtyard area
with benches and a pedestrian pathway to the west of the building on the site. The
courtyard area, which provides passive recreational opportunities to employees and
visitors to the site, would not be impacted by the proposed WCF.
✓
i. Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines
and Mt. Rainier, and incorporating public access to shorelines
Staff Comment: The proposed structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or
Mt. Rainier. See “Views” under criterion ‘e’ above for additional analysis.
The public access requirement is not applicable to the proposal.
✓
j. Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems
where applicable.
Staff Comments: See “Natural Features” under criterion ‘f’ above.
✓ k. Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to
accommodate the proposed use.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 19 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
Staff Comments: The proposal does not necessitate or propose any new public services
or facilities as part of the project.
Police and Fire.
Staff Comment: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist
to furnish services to the proposed development.
Water and Sewer.
Staff Comment: The proposed use does not require water or sewer service.
Drainage.
Staff Comment: The project proposes less than 2,000 square feet of new impervious
area and less than 5,000 square feet of new plus replaced impervious area, therefore,
the project is exempt from Storm Drainage Review. Final evaluation would be based
on review of the Building Permit Application materials. If more than 2,000 square feet
of new and/or replaced impervious area is proposed, the project will be subject to
drainage review. Surface water system development fee is $0.80 per square foot of
new impervious surface, but not less than $2,000. This is payable prior to issuance of
a civil construction permit.
Transportation.
Staff Comment: Due to the nature of the project, an unmanned WCF, no impacts to
the City’s transportation system are anticipated to occur as a result of the project.
N/A a. Phasing: The applicant is not requesting any additional phasing.
✓
b. Stormwater: Providing optimal locations of stormwater infiltrating low impact
development facilities. Avoiding placement of buildings or impervious areas on soils
with infiltration capability to the maximum extent practicable.
Staff Comment: The stormwater system would be evaluated at the time of Building
Permit Review.
I. CONCLUSIONS:
1. The subject site is located in the Residential High Density (RHD) Comprehensive Plan designation and
complies with the goals and policies established with this designation, see FOF 16.
2. The subject site is located in the Residential-14 (R-14) zoning designation and complies with the zoning
and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 17.
3. The proposed Conditional Use Permit complies with the eight (8) Conditional Use Permit criteria provided
the applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 18.
4. The proposed wireless communications facility complies with the site plan review criteria provided the
applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 19.
5. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed Conditional Use Permit,
see FOF 19.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 20 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
6. Key features which are integral to this project include the installation of additional landscaping around
the equipment enclosure, the six-foot tall wood fence around the equipment enclosure, improving and
utilizing the adjacent public alley for installation and maintenance access, and utilizing a faux tree design
that is life-like and reflective of a native Pacific Northwest tree species west of the Cascade Mountain
range. The faux tree is in proportionate scale with nearby trees in the neighborhood, screens the WCF
antennas and associated appurtenances, and provides the ability for future collocation.
J. RECOMMENDATION:
The Crown Castle: 816039 WCF site plan review and Conditional Use Permit, File No. LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-
HS-A, as depicted in Exhibit 2, is approved and is subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Non-Significance Mitigated, dated July 12, 2021.
a. The applicant shall improve the portion of the public alley (APN 7227802041) extending north from
the project site with a length of approximately 250 feet per the City of Renton street standards
contained in RMC 4-6-060. The final design and extent of the alley improvements shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Plan Reviewer at the time for Civil Construction Permit review.
2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan showing sight-obscuring native trees around all four
sides of the equipment enclosure perimeter. The applicant shall utilize trees that grow to a large size at
maturity and may include species such as Western Red Cedar, Douglas Fir, or an alternative native species.
The detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit issuance.
3. The applicant shall incorporate a textured finish or cladding system on the main support pole, such as the
Larson Ultraflex bark offered by Valmont Structures, that imitates the look of natural tree park. The
applicant shall submit a physical sample of the proposed finish to be reviewed and approved by the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
4. The applicant shall submit an engineering analysis prepared by a professional engineer that makes a
specific finding confirming the reduced setback is safe. The analysis should be submitted at the time of
building permit application for review and approval by the City’s structural engineer.
5. The applicant shall submit an updated construction plan set and photo simulations that clearly documents
the code-required branch density as well as shows the branches installed down to a minimum of 20 feet
above grade. The updated plan set and photo simulations shall be reviewed and approved by the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
6. The applicant shall utilize a design that mimics a tree species native to western Washington including for
structure features such as faux bark, branches, and needles. The tree species utilized for the design shall
be reviewed and approved by Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall add antenna socks with realistic faux foliage to all antennas. In addition, the applicant
shall paint all other cabling and equipment on the stealth tower brown or green depending on location in
order better blend into the environment. All future new or swapped equipment on the stealth tower shall
also utilize antenna socks with faux foliage, regardless of the carrier. The antenna sock specifications shall
be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
8. No part of the equipment mounted on the stealth tower support pole shall extend beyond the faux lateral
branches unless an alternative concealment method is approved by the Current Planning Project
Manager. The applicant shall submit an updated plan set and photo simulations showing the updated
design to be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit
issuance.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
CROWN CASTLE: 816039 WCF
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Report of February 22, 2022 Page 21 of 21
SR_HEX Report_Monopine_220215_v4
9. The applicant shall provide a letter from a professional RF engineer demonstrating that future collocation
of at least one (1) other wireless carrier is feasible based on the existing site characteristics and design of
the proposed monopole and associated equipment enclosure. The letter shall be submitted to the Current
Planning Project Manager for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
EXHIBITS
Project Name:
Crown Castle: 816039 WCF
Land Use File Number:
LUA21-000203, CU-A, SA-H
Date of Hearing
February 22, 2022
Staff Contact
Alex Morganroth
Senior Planner
Project Contact/Applicant
Jennifer Taylor
Lynx Consulting
17311 135th Ave NE, Ste
A100, Woodinville, WA
98072
Project Location
2902 NE 12th St (APN
7227802040 and
7227802041)
The following exhibits are included with the Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner:
Exhibits 1-9: As shown in the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report
Exhibit 10: Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
Exhibit 11: Duwamish Tribe Email, dated July 24, 2021
Exhibit 12: Environmental Review Committee Decision dated July 12, 2021
Exhibit 13: Tree Survey
Exhibit 14: RF Justification
Exhibit 15: Bark Example