Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
File #8 - Correspondence/Legal Documents/Review Sheets (1984-1985)
PROCEDURE FOR A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF FILMS PRESENTED AT THE RENTON THEATER FROM JANUARY 20, 1983 TO PRESENT 1. The following procedure establishes the methodology for cataloging the content of various scenes and depictions shown in video tape copies of motion pictures exhibited at the Renton Theater from January 20, 1983 to the present. 2. This review process will consist of two parts. .Part One will catalog the various scenes and depictions within the motion pictures to provide for ease of selection and recall of individual scenes, if required. During the viewing of each motion picture in the form of a video tape recording (VCR), the tape counter on the Minolta video tape recorder, will be used to identify the beginning and end of each film, the beginning and end of each scene, and the beginning and end of individual sexual activities which may be in conflict with the City's Ordinance 3526, as amended, relating to the location of adult motion picture theaters. 3. Part Two of the review of each of these motion pictures with be in the form of a quantitative analysis of those portions of the motion picture (in the form of a video tape) illustrating various sexual activities which may be in conflict with Ordinance 3526, as amended. A. The Policy Development Department upon review of Ordinance 3526, as amended, has identified twelve potential categories of depictions which may be shown in the individual films. B. Each staff member reviewing an individual film will identify the beginning and end of each scene or change in activity specified in Section 5 below by the means of the tape counter located on the.Minolta VCR. C. The entire motion picture will be cataloged into one of the twelve categories listed in Section 5 below. No scene or activity depicted will be identified into more than one category (see Section 6 Procedures on Special Circumstances). D. At the completion of the cataloging each film from beginning to end, the duration of each type of depiction will be determined by subtracting the time of the beginning of each scene from the time of completion of each scene (as established by the tape counter on the Minolta VCR). E. Based upon the total duration of the film as established by subtracting the beginning tape count from the ending tape count, each cataloged scene or change in depiction will be calculated as to its percentage of the total film by the activity type (identified in Section 5 below). 4. Contents of the Reviewers Data Sheet A. The Data Sheet will identify the reviewer. B. The Data Sheet will identify the date upon which the film review takes place. C. The Data Sheet will identify the time of commencing review of the film in question. D. The Data Sheet will contain the film title. E. The elapsed time for each scene will be identified by use of the tape counter indicating the start and stop position of the tape counter at the beginning and the end of each scene, or the beginning and end of any alteration in the activity presented as identified in Section 5 below. F. Immediately adjacent to the tape counter readings for the beginning and end of each individual scene, the reviewer will identify the activity depicted and classify it into one of the twelve catagories identified in Section 5 below. G. Immediately adjacent to the activity type, the reviewer will place a brief description of the scene or activity, generally attempting to identify the names or roles of the "actors" participating in the scene or activity. H. At the bottom of the reviewer's data sheet, the time of completion of the review will be identified. I. For the purposes of continuity, the Data Sheet attached to this procedure identified as Attachment "A" will be utilized. 5. Definition of Catagories of Activities A. Category 0: No portrayal of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" defined as follows as defined by Ordinance 3526 as amended. (1) "Specified sexual activities": (a) Human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation or arousal. (b) Acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse, or sodomy. (c) Fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttock or female breast. (2) "Specified anatomical areas": (a) Less than completely or opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttock, and female breast below a point immediately above the top of areola; and (b) Human male genitals in a discernible turgid state, even if completely or opaquely covered. B. Category 1: Depiction of specified anatomical areas (see definition above). C. Category 2: The depiction of heterosexual intercourse (sexual intercourse between partners of the opposite sex). D. Category 3: Depictions of homosexual intercourse (intercourse between partners of the same sex). E. Category 4: Depiction of human masturbation by members of the opposite sex. F. Category 5: Depiction of cunnilingus (oral stimulation of the vulva or clitoris [Webster's New Collegiate] by a member of the opposite sex). G. Category 6: Depiction of fellatio (oral stimulation of the penis [Webster's New Collegiate] by a member of the opposite sex). H. Category 7: Depiction of anal intercourse (stimulation or penetration of the anus by a member of the opposite sex). I. Category 8: Depiction of more than two sex partners (regardless of sex or combination of sexes) engaged in "specified sexual activities." J. Category 9: Sado masochism (infliction of pain as a means of sexual release upon oneself or one's sexual partner [Webster's New Collegiate] by partners of the opposite sex). K. Category 10: Depiction of rape/violence (sexual intercourse or other sexual acts accomplished through the use of force or violence). L. Category 11: Combinations of depictions in Categories 1 through 10 above. This category is only to be utilized where rapid changes in scene or activity category occurs in a manner in which explicit delineation of the precise category would be essentially meaningless due to its short duration but where the total duration of the activities is of sufficient duration to be significant. (For further information on this category, see Section 6 below dealing with procedures for special circumstances.) 6. Procedures for Special Circumstances A. Category 11 is intended to be a "last resort" category where changes of scene, changes of sequence, or other circumstances make it impossible to clearly identify individual activities as listed in Category 0 through 10. Category 11 "combinations" may be also be utilized where a sequence of films scenes flash between groups or individual in a "rapid fire" fashion. B. In the event that the reviewer is uncertain of the appropriate designation for a series of scenes or activities, that portion of the video tape should be identified through the tape counter readings and will be reviewed by the Policy Development Director in conjunction with the reviewer to establish the correct categories and durations by category. 7. Data Preparation A. Data obtain by the review team will be entered into a computer file for analysis. B. The computer file will match existing work completed in the Policy Development Director's review of the initial 16 films as illustrated on Attachment "B." C. The computer analysis will calculate the duration of each scene or depiction by activity type. D. Based upon the calculated duration of activity type, the computer will calculate the percentage duration by each activity type. E. Upon completion of the calculations, a computer printout record will be prepared and the results retained for permanent record. F. The original data sheet indicating the reviewer and data of review will be retained for permanent record. G. The computer data file will be retained for permanent record. 'i . REVIEWER 'S NAME: START TIME OF REVIEW: - ! ! : ! ! ! M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME: - ! ! : ! ! ! M FILM TITLE: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 `1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= C) NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINSUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE P MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE • (TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION gill 1 1 1 1 I 1 __ 1 1 -_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 i __ 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1 __ I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I __ I I __ I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ I I __ I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I. I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I 'i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ I 1 __ 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I _- 1 ! ...._...._ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -_ I I __. I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I __ 1 1 __ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I• I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I__ 1 1 __. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 -- I ! _._. I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I_.- 1 I --- I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I -- I I __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 __ 1 I __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --_ 1 I __ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I __ I 1 -_ 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I II I I I I__ 1 I __ 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I II I I I I __ 1 I __ I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I --- 1 ! __ I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 11 I I 1 I __ 1 I __ I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 / ^ ' . 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE CASSETTE #1: FILM 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE SCENES IN SEQUENCIAL 4 MASTURBATION ORDER 5 CUNNILINGUS / 6 FELLATIO � / 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE , 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS ^' 9 SADO MASOCHISM � 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE SCENE E. T. . (TAPE COUNTER) CASSETTE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 0 40 40 0 6. 5 � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 40 64 24 6 3. 9 FATHER AND FRIEND / 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 64 75 11 5 1 . 8 FATHER AND FRIEND : 1 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 75 80 5 4 0. 8 FATHER AND FRIEND ' 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 80 105 25 5 4 FATHER AND FRIEND ] 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 105 119 14 2 2. 3 FATHER AND FRIEND � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 119 185 66 0 11 | / 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 185 225 40 9 6. 5 BOYFRIEND AND SM i 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 225 270 45 0 7. 3 � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 270 289 19 6 3. 1 AUTHOR AND FRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 289 300 11 5 1. 8 AUTHOR AND FRIEND � 1' AMERICAN DESIRE 300 331 31 2 5 AUTHOR AND FRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 331 397 66 0 11 j 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 397 403 6 9 1 BOYFRIEND AND HITCHHIKER � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 403 415 12 4 1 .9 BOYFRIEND AND HITCHHIKER 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 415 424 9 6 1 . 5 BOYFRIEND AND HITCHHIKER 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 424 437 13 2 2. 1 BOYFRIEND AND HITCHHIKER � � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 437 460 23 0 3. 7 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 460 500 40 10 6. 5 AUTHOR AND GIRLFRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 500 509 9 6 1 . 5 WORKMAN AND GIRLFRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 509 517 8 5 1 . 3 WORKMAN AND GIRLFRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 517 525 8 2 1 . 3 WORKMAN AND GIRLFRIEND 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 525 542 17 8 2. 7 AUTHOR,WORKMAN & GIRLFRIEND / 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 542 552 10 0 1 . 6 . 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 552 574 22 4 3. 5 BOYFRIEND AND GIRLFRIEND ' � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 574 596 22 2 3. 5 BOYFRIEND AND GIRLFRIEND � 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 596 606 10 3 1 . 6 GIRLFRIEND AND HITCHHIKER 1 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 606 620 14 8 2. 3 BOY, GIRL & HITCHHIKER / / 1 AMERICAN DESIRE 620 100 % � ------------ | | | _ ___------__-' - �� ~ a ` SUMMARY OF FILMS SHOWN AT THE RENTON THEATER ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY TYPE FOR FILMS STIPULATED TO BE SHOWN TO JURY PERCENTAGE OF FILM SCENES BY ACTIVITY TYPE BY FILM FILM FILM TITLE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1711s _ CT DEEP THROAT 37 16 10 6 23 7. 3 62. 9 35 DEEP THROAT 40 6. 3 6. 3 6. 3 19 7. 9 3. 2 11 60 CT DEVIL IN MISS JONES 30 11 2. 2 19 16 4.5 10 4. 9 2~ 9 70 35 DEVIL IN MISS JONES 19 8. 8 3. 5 12 8. 8 18 12 7 7 3. 5 81 CT PANDORA' S MIRROR 49 3. 3 6. 7 3. 6 4 217 6. 1 1 . 1 14 5. 7 4. 1 51 . 3 35 PANDORA' S MIRROR 43 3. 2 5.4 2. 2 5. 4 4. 3 35 1 . 1 57 CT LITTLE FRENCH MAID 31 2. 9 3. 9 6.8 9. 3 46 69 35 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 3 � 1. 4 6. 8 4. 1 4. 1 19 32 67. 4 CT UP AND COMING 62 5. 7 2. 8 5. 3 3.9 7. 3 13 38 35 UP AND COMING 54 1. 2 2.4 12 2. 4 2. 4 11 3. 6 12 46. 3 CT TABOO II 36 12 20 6. 1 0. 4 0. 4 9. 4 16 64. 3 35 TABOO II 34 1 28 6 1 7 23 66 CT DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 31 23 6. 3 6. 8 4. 7 16 11 1 . 4 69. 2 35 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 26 4. 1 6.8 11 6. 8 41 4. 1 74 CT BODY TALK 62 6. 3 6. 9 7. 5 3. 9 6.3 5. 5 1 . 8 38. 2 35 BODY TALK 54 6. 3 22 1 . 3 3. 8 10 2. 5 46 ' CT SAN FERNANDO VLY GIRLS 30 4. 6 20 9. 1 4.6 19 2. 2 9.4 0. 9 70 35 SAN FERNANDO VLY GIRLS 31 2. 6 18 9. 1 3. 9 18 16 1 . 3 69 CT SOCIETY AFFAIRS 54 23 9. 6 4. 1 2. 5 6. 6 ' 46 35 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 49 1 . 1 20 3.4 6. 7 7. 9 3.4 7. 9 50. 8 AVERAGE VALUE 40 6.4 11 7. 6 4~ 9 4. 1 11 6. 6 16 4.2 3 4. 1 59. 8 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE 40 6 11 5. 3 2. 2 2. 5 11 3. 3 16 0. 8 0. 7 1 59. 8 MAXIMUM VALUE 62 23 28 19 11 6. 7 23 19 46 7 5. 7 11 81 MINIMUM VALUE 19 1 2. 2 1 . 3 0. 4 0.4 4. 1 1 . 1 3. 2 0. 9 1 . 3 1 . 1 38 DEPICTED IN FILMS 20 19 20 14 9 12 19 10 20 4 5 5 � 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS DEEP THROAT 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION DEEP THROAT 15 22 7 0 11 DEEP THROAT 25 29 4 0 6. 3 DEEP THROAT 38 41 3 0 4. 8 DEEP THROAT 43 45 2 0 3�. 2 DEEP THROAT 50 52 2 0 3. 2 DEEP THROAT 55 57 2 0 3. 2 DEEP THROAT 58 59 1 0 1 . 6 ' DEEP THROAT 60 61 1 0 1 . 6 DEEP THROAT 71 74 3 O 4. 8 40 % DEEP THROAT 41 43 2 1 3. 2 DR YOUNG & LINDA DEEP THROAT 68 70 2 1 3. 2 LINDA' S CLOSE SHAVE 6. 3 % DEEP THROAT 52 54 2 2 3. 2 LINDA PHYSIOTHERAPIST DEEP THROAT 57 58 1 2 1 . 6 DR YOUNG & LINDA DEEP THROAT 59 60 1 2 1 . 6 NURSE & DR YOUNG 6. 3 % DEEP THROAT 22 25 3 5 4. 8 HELEN ON COUNTER DEEP THROAT 70 71 1 5 1 .6 NURSE & DR YOUNG 6. 3 % DEEP THROAT 33 35 2 6 3.2 LINDA & MAN DEEP THROAT 45 50 5 6 7. 9 DR YOUNG & LINDA DEEP THROAT 54 55 1 6 1 .6 NURSE & DR YOUNG DEEP THROAT 74 78 4 6 6. 3 LINDA & WILBUR 19 % DEEP THROAT 29 31 2 7 3.2 LINDA & MAN DEEP THROAT 35 38 3 7 4. 8 HELEN & 2 GUYS 7. 9 % DEEP THROAT 31 33 2 8 3. 2 HELEN & 2 GUYS 3. 2 % DEEP THROAT 61 68 7 11 11 NURSE OR LINDA & DR YOUNG 11 % DEEP THROAT 63 100 % � 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS DEVIL IN MISS JONES 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION _________________ DEVIL IN MISS JONES 40 ^41 1 0 1 .8 DEVIL IN MISS JONES 47 56 9 0 16 DEVIL IN MISS JONES 89 90 1 0 1 . 8 19 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 41 45 4 1 7 MISS JONES DEVIL IN MISS JONES 56 57 1 1 1 . 8 MISS JONES & TEACHER 8. 8 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 64 66 2 2 3. 5 MISS JONES & TEACHER 3. 5 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 68 75 7 3 12 MISS JONES & WOMAN 12 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 75 76 1 4 1 . 8 MISS JONES IN TUB DEVIL IN MISS JONES 82 85 3 4 5. 3 MISS JONES & FRUIT DEVIL IN MISS JONES 97 98 1 4 1 . 8 TRYING TO GET OFF 8. 8 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 59 64 5 6 8.8 MISS JONES & TEACHER DEVIL IN MISS JONES 77 82 5 6 8. 8 MISS JONES & TEACHER 18 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 57 59 2 7 3. 5 MISS JONES & TEACHER DEVIL IN MISS JONES 66 68 2 7 3. 5 MISS JONES & TEACHER DEVIL IN MISS JONES 76 77 1 7 1 . 8 MISS JONES IN TUB DEVIL IN MISS JONES 94 96 2 7 3. 5 MISS JONES & 2 MEN 12 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 90 94 4 8 7 MISS JONES, MAN & WOMAN 7 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 85 89 4 9 7 MISS JONES & SNAKE 7 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 45 47 2 10 3. 5 SLITS WRISTS IN TUB 3. 5 % DEVIL IN MISS JONES 57 100 % ' ` 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION ' 5 CUNNILINGUS PANDORA' S MIRROR 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION ___ ---------------- PANDORA' S MIRROR 46 51 5 0 5. 4 PANDORA' S MIRROR 52 53 1 0 1 . 1 PANDORA' S MIRROR 56 62 6 0 6. 5 PANDORA' S MIRROR 68 73 5 0 5. 4 PANDORA' S MIRROR 74 80 6 0 6. 5 PANDORA' S MIRROR 89 92 3 0 3. 2 PANDORA' S MIRROR 100 108 8 0 8. 6 PANDORA' S MIRROR 120 124 4 0 4. 3 PANDORA' S MIRROR 133 134 1 0 1 . 1 PANDORA' S MIRROR 138 139 1 0 I . J. 43 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 62 63 1 1 1 . 1 LYDIA & 3 DESERTERS PANDORA' S MIRROR , 82 84 2 1 2. 2 NANCY 3. 2 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 73 74 1 2 1 . 1 CARLOS & MS BARRETT PANDORA' S MIRROR 96 100 4 2 4.3 LIZ & PETER 5. 4 % ' PANDORA' S MIRROR 80 82 2 3 2. 2 MS BARRETT & NANCY 2. 2 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 53 56 3 4 3. 2 PANDORA IN SHOWER PANDORA' S MIRROR 108 110 2 4 2. 2 BONNY LAMAY W/DILDO 5. 4 % PANDORA' S MIRROR , 92 96 4 6 4. 3 LIZ & PETER 4. 3 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 63 68 5 8 5. 4 LYDIA & 3 DESERTERS PANDORA' S MIRROR 84 89 5 8 5. 4 NANCY, CARLOS & LANCE PANDORA' S MIRROR 110 120 10 8 11 BONNY, BOB, BARBARA & GIRL PANDORA' S MIRROR 124 133 9 8 9. 7 ALICE @ HELLFIRE CLUB PANDORA' S MIRROR 134 138 4 8 4. 3 PANDORA & WEIGHTLIFTERS 35 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 51 52 1 11 1 . 1 FLASHBACKS 1 . 1 % PANDORA' S MIRROR 93 100 % ` 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS LITTLE FRENCH MAID 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION LITTLE FRENCH MAID 7 14 7 0 *9. 6 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 26 28 2 0 2. 7 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 29 30 1 0 1 . 4 CONNIE & JOHN LITTLE FRENCH MAID 41 45 4 0 5. 5 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 52 55 3 0 4. 1 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 60 64 4 0 5. 5 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 70 71 1 0 1 . 4 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 78 80 2 0 2. 7 33 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 28 29 1 1 1 . 4 CONNIE & GIRLFRIEND 1 . 4 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 48 50 2 2 2. 7 CONNIE & GEORGE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 72 75 3 2 4. 1 CONNIE & MIKE FLASHBACKS 6. 8 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 15 16 1 4 1 . 4 JOHN & CONNIE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 64 66 2 4 2. 7 CONNIE & 2 PILOTS 4. 1 ' % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 14 15 1 6 1 . 4 JOHN & CONNIE' LITTLE FRENCH MAID 71 72 1 6 1 . 4 CONNIE & MIKE FLASHBACKS LITTLE FRENCH MAID 77 78 1 6 1 .4 CONNIE & MIKE FLASHBACKS 4. 1 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 21 23 2 7 2. 7 MASTER, JOHN & CONNIE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 35 40 5 7 6. 8 CONNIE,JOHN & GIRLFRIEND LITTLE FRENCH MAID 50 52 2 7 2. 7 CONNIE & GEORGE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 58 59 1 7 1 . 4 CONNIE, JOHN & BROTHER MIKE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 68 70 2 7 2. 7 CONNIE & 2 PILOTS LITTLE FRENCH MAID 75 77 2 7 2. 7 CONNIE & MIKE FLASHBACKS 19 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 16 21 5 8 6. 8 MASTER, JOHN &. CONNIE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 23 26 3 8 4. 1 MASTER, JOHN & CONNIE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 30 35 5 8 6. 8 CONNIE, JOHN & GIRLFRIEND LITTLE FRENCH. MAID 40 41 1 8 1 . 4 CONNIE, JOHN & GIRLFRIEND LITTLE FRENCH MAID 45 48 3 8 4. 1 GEORGE, CONNIE & TOM LITTLE FRENCH MAID 55 58 3 8 4. 1 CONNIE, JOHN & BROTHER MIKE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 59 60 1 8 1 . 4 CONNIE, JOHN & BROTHER MIKE LITTLE FRENCH MAID 66 68 2 8 2. 7 CONNIE & 2 PILOTS 32 % LITTLE FRENCH MAID 73 100 % ^ , 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS UP N' COMING 16 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION UP N' COMING 2 5 3 0 3.6 / UP N' COMING 10 17 7 0 8. 3 UP N' COMING 21 29 8 0 9. 5 UP N` COMING 33 43 10 0 12 UP N' COMING 54 57 3 0 3. 6 UP N' COMING 60 73 13 O 15 UP N' COMING 83 84 1 0 1 . 2 54 % 43 44 1 1 1 2 ON THE YACHT UP N' COMING . 1 . 2 % UP N` COMING 9 10 1 2 1 . 2 JIMMY & CASSIE UP N' COMING 20 21 1 2 1 . 2 PR MAN & CLOSER 2. 4 % UP N` COMING 44 54 10 3 12 CASSIE & MELANIE 12 % UP N' COMING 0 2 2 4 2. 4 FROM BED TO THE SHOWER 2. 4 % UP N' COMING 5 6 1 5 1 . 2 JIMMY & CASSIE UP N' COMING 19 20 1 5 1 . 2 PR MAN & CLOSER 2.4 % UP N` COMING 6 9 3 6 3. 6 JIMMY & CASSIE UP N` COMING 17 19 2 6 2. 4 PR MAN & CLOSER UP N' COMING 57 60 3 6 3. 6 CASSIE & DJ UP N' COMING ' 73 74 1 6 1 . 2 CASSIE & CHARLIE 11 % UP N' COMING 32 33 1 7 1 .2 CASSIE, FRANK & JESSIE UP N' COMING 81 83 2 7 2. 4 CASSIE, CHARLIE, JAME & GIRL 3.6 % UP N' COMING 29 32 3 8 3. 6 CASSIE, FRANK & JESSIE UP N' COMING 74 81 7 8 8. 3 CASSIE, CHARLIE, JAME & GIRL 12 % UP N' COMING 84 100 % , � 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE ' 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS TABOO II 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION TABOO II 37 39 2 0 2- TABOO II 41 44 3 0 3 TABOO II 52 53 1 0 1 TABOO II 56 60 4 O 4 TABOO II 65 66 1 0 1 TABOO II 69 73 4 0 4 TABOO II 78 81 3 0 3 TABOO II 85 86 1 0 1 TABOO II 90 94 4 0 4 TABOO II 95 99 4 O 4 TABOO II 106 107 1 0 1 TABOO II 120 125 5 0 5 TABOO II 133 134 1 0 1 34 % TABOO II 49 50 1 1 1 BARBARA & TINA 1 % TABOO II 39 40 1 2 1 JUNIOR & GIRLFRIEND TABOO II 61 65 4 2 4 JUINOR & GIRLFRIEND TABOO II 66 69 3 2 3 MOM & DAD/JUNIOR WATCHES TABOO II 81 85 4 2 4 JUNIOR & SISTER TABOO II 87 90 3 2 3 JUNIOR & SISTER CAUGHT ` 99 106 7 2 7 MOTHER & JUNIOR TABOO II TABOO II 130 133 3 2 3 DAUGHTER & DAD TABOO II 134 137 3 2 . 3 FATHER & MOTHER 28 % TABOO II 44 49 5 3 5 BARBARA & TINA TABOO II 73 74 1 3 1 SISTER & GIRLFRIEND 6 % TABOO II 94 95 1 4 1 MOTHER IN TUB 1 % TABOO II 60 61 1 6 1 JUINOR & GIRLFRIEND TABOO II 86 87 1 6 1 TINA & MAN TABOO II 125 130 5 6 5 DAUGHTER & DAD 7 % TABOO II 40 41 1 8 1 ORGY TABOO II 50 52 2 8 2 BARBARA, TINA & JUNIOR TABOO II 53 56 3 8 3 BARBARA, TINA & JUNIOR TABOO II 74 78 4 8 4 SISTER, JUNIOR & GIRLFRIEND TABOO II 107 120 13 8 13 ORGY 23 % to(-) t00 % TABOO II , � 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION ____________ ------- DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 11 12 1 0 1 . 4 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 13 18 5 0 6. 8 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 29 32 3 0 4. 1 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 36 37 1 0 1 . 4 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 45 47 2 0 2. 7 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 55 57 2 O 2. 7 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 61 62 1 0 1 . 4 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 65 67 2 0 2. 7 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 69 71 ' 2 0 2. 7 26 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 12 13 1 1 1 . 4 GIRLS IN THE LOCKER ROOM DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 34 36 2 1 2. 7 GIRLS IN THE LOCKER ROOM 4. 1 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 79 84 5 2 6.8 DEBBIE & MR GREENFELD 6. 8 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 32 34 2 4 2. 7 DEBBIE & MR GREENFELD DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 37 40 3 4 4. 1 ROBERTA & CANDLE DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 75 78 3 4 4. 1 DEBBIE & MR GREENFELD it % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 57 61 4 6 5. 5 DONNA & TIME @ LIBRARY DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 78 79 1 6 1 . 4 DEBBIE & MR GREENFELD 6. 8 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 18 29 11 8 15 GIRLS & GUYS IN THE SHOWER DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 40 45 5 8 6. 8 ROBERTA & MR/MRS HARDWICK DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 47 55 8 8 11 TWO GIRLS & MR BRADLEY DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 67 69 2 8 2. 7 HAL, ASHLEY & LISA DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 71 75 4 8 5. 5 TAMMY, LISA & BOOKSTORE 41 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 62 65 ' 9 4. 1 MR BIDDLE SPANKS DONNA 4. 1 % DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 73 100 % ' , � 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS BODY TALI-.''. 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION _ BODY TALK 13 20 7 0 8. 9 BODY TALK 24 36 12 0 15 BODY TALK 45 47 2 0 2. 5 BODY TALK 48 51 3 0 3. 8 BODY TALK 51 53 2 0 2. 5 BODY TALK 61 63 2 0 2. 5 BODY TALK 68 69 1 0 1 . 3 BODY TALK 73 84 11 0 14 BODY TALK 87 89 2 0 2. 5 BODY TALK 91 92 1 0 1 . 3 54 % BODY TALK 37 38 1 1 1 . 3 CASSIE & LISA BODY TALK 69 72 3 1 3. 8 CASSIE & MAN BODY TALK 72 73 1 1 1 . 3 MARK AS STRIPPER 6. 3 % ` BODY TALK 20 21 1 2 1 . 3 TJ & LISA 23 24 1 2 1 . 3 TJ & LISA BODY TALK . BODY TALK 38 45 7 2 8. 9 CASSIE & MAN BODY TALK 47 48 1 2 1 . 3 MARK & CASSIE BODY TALK 63 64 1 2 1 . 3 MARK & CASSIE BODY TALK . 65 68 3 2 3 8 MARK & CASSIE BODY TALK 84 87 3 2 3. 8 TJ & LISA 22 % BODY TALK 36 37 1 3 1 . 3 CASSIE & LISA ' 1 . 3 % BODY TALK 21 23 2 5 2. 5 TJ & LISA BODY TALK 64 65 1 5 1 . 3 MARK & CASSIE 3. 8 % BODY TALK 53 61 8 8 10 CASSIE & 2 MEN/JEREMY WATCH 10 % BODY TALK 89 91 2 11 2. 5 MARK & CASSIE FLASHBACKS 2. 5 % BODY TALI-.:: 79 100 % - ^ / 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 11 12 1 0 1 .3 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 13 15 2 0 2. 6 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 20 26 61 0 7. 8 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 14 19 5 0 6. 5 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 34 38 4 0 5. 2 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 45 46 1 0 1 . 3 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 54 58 4 0 5~ 2 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 59 60 1 0 1 . 3 31 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 12 13 11 1 1 . 3 DESCRIBING A ' VAL' SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 58 59 1 1 1 . 3 MALE STRIPPER 2. 6 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 11 14 3 2 3.9 BOY & GIRL SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 26 27 1 2 1 . 3 SISTER & GARDENER FLASHBACK SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 30 32 2 2 2.6 SISTER & GARDENER FLASHBACK SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 60 68 8 2 10 TAMI & MAIL STRIPPER 18 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 24 26 2 3 2.6 GIRLFRIENDS SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 27 30 3 3 3.9 GIRLFRIENDS SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 32 34 2 3 2.6 GIRLFRIENDS 9. 1 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 6 8 2 5 2.6 BOY & GIRL SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 38 39 1 5 1 . 3 GIRL @ HAIRDRESSER 3. 9 % `SAN FERNANDO 'VALLEY GIRLS 15 20 5 6 6. 5 TIFFANY & BRIAN SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 8 11 13 6 3. 9 BOY & GIRL SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 19 24 5 6 6. 5 -SISTER & GARDENER FLASHBACK SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 39 40 1 6 1 . 3 GIRL @ HAIRDRESSER 18 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 40 45 5 8 6. 5 GIRL @ 2 HAIRDRESSER SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 47 54 7 8 9. 1 GIRLS & BARTENDER 16 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 46 47 1 10 1 . 3 GIRLS FIGHTING ' 1 . 3 % SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GIRLS 77 100 % . � . 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES ' 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE ' 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS SOCIETY AFFAIRS 6 FELLATIO SCENES SORTED BY 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ACTIVITY TYPE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE ELAPSE TIME 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE FILM TITLE START STOP TIME TYPE % DESCRIPTION SOCIETY AFFAIRS 33 37 4 0 4. 5 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 40 41 1 0 1 . 1 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 43 52 9 0 10 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 57 62 5 0 5. 6 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 65 70 5 0 5. 6 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 73 75 2 0 2. 2 SO&ETY AFFAIRS 81 85 4 0 4. 5 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 92 94 2 0 2. 2 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 105 109 4 0 4. 5 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 114 122 8 0 9 49 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 39 40 1 1 1 . 1 RICK LOOKING AROUND 1 . 1 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 37 38 1 2 1 . 1 RICK & GIRL SOCIETY AFFAIRS 41 42 1 2 1 . 1 ALEXIS & ARTHUR IN CAR SOCIETY AFFAIRS 62 63 1 2 1 . 1 HOWARD & TARA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 77 79 2 2 2. 2 HOWARD & SISTER DORENA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 94 98 4 2 4. 5 ARTHUR & SARENA IN GYM SOCIETY AFFAIRS 98 105 7 2 7. 9 HOWARD & SARENA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 111 113 2 2 2. 2 HOWARD & LILLIAN 20 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 70 73 3 3 3.4 2 GIRLS IN HOWARDS ROOM 3. 4 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 52 57 5 5 5. 6 TWO MAIDS SOCIETY AFFAIRS 75 76 1 1 . 1 HOWARD & SISTER DORENA 6.7 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 38 39 1 6 1 . 1 RICK & GIRL SOCIETY AFFAIRS 42 43 1 6 1 . 1 ALEXIS & ARTHUR IN CAR SOCIETY AFFAIRS 63 65 2 6 2. 2 HOWARD & TARA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 76 77 1 6 1 . 1 HOWARD & SISTER DORENA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 109 111 2 6 2. 2 HOWARD & LILLIAN 7. 9 % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 79 81 2 7 2. 2 HOWARD & SISTER DORENA SOCIETY AFFAIRS 113 114 1 7 1 . 1 HOWARD & LILLIAN 3.4' % SOCIETY AFFAIRS 85 90 5 8 5. 6 BACHELOR PARTY SOCIETY AFFAIRS 90 92 2 8 2. 2 HOWARD & 3 GIRLS 7. 9 % SOCIETY AFFAI.RS 89 100 % OF 1l4 THE CITY OF RENTON of ;D. Z POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 0 memo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9-0 co. O P 9�TFD SEP1°� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR January 6, 1984 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FROM: David R. Clemens, Policy Development Director RE: FORBES VS CITY OF RENTON Attached are the last two films and the summary sheet. Attachments . J , t r i ANALYSIS OE' FILMS VIEWED tJED ' SUMMARY OFFILMS. SHOWN r. _I..L,.Ic Til::.i`l Ti.JN THEATER . BETWEEN :I. 1:i'4 & 1 ::r'','?!:1 r`r C] . PERCENTAGE ENT Gf: OF FILM , SCENE8 BY ACTIVITY TYPE BY FILM FILM 'µ 1) .L ,-.t 3 4 5 r 7 ^} 9. j 0 11 1.,.i s 6.3. r LUST INFERNO 'I 5 2, 5 • 21 =5 6..,6., 4 NIGHT HUNGER 41 3 3- 23 H 6. 3- 3.. 8 • 14. 5.4 59. 4 SAME TIME h -rT YEAR 16 7. 9 14 ` : ' 7. 9 . - r1' 2 1 . L % ;4 u . GOLDEN GIRLS � ; ' 1 . .. 30 _: „ : r „ _ 9. 1 60 r'11.._I ABOUT (Nfl k i l:":l""I"I.:. 20 13 i.:::, 14 .I. :L. .-•i'. ? ,_ . .I, ...17 I i. • ORIENTAL I'It-u.it:.:iI: 1: :i' , 16 10 . • 42 .. f_;:'::r�,l FROM pia a E. u "i' :L :i.• 35, 3„ 8. 3. 8 . 13 5 .'1. ' EROTIC INTERLUDE. 24 ' ; t:?„ : • . . 9. 8 '76, FLESH & LACE 'R u,''f '6. ., 2t:I. 7. 3 4.2 16 25 . 79. 4 FLESH LACE II 17 1. 1. 26 . . 3, 4. 9. 8 ��,._«' . :.J. 4• 8,, TOO MUCH TOO SOON • ' 68. 1 : CALENDAR GIRL . :L 1 4 11 12. 12 . 4'9 82''. 4. . J WATCH CL..i ,,2.9 1. 3 :25 ` 1!:? 5, 1 . _.;. is ' L._�F�� :� TO I,,;!�.�-'• �I. ' !:1 . :L :, r, I 1 BODIES .I.I'.• HEAT �I-•_; ' - ••' i. Ct?. t:? �.� i. 5. 4 2 n ; 2 8 - 9. :;t r --t .. 5 --t' c::• 3. 2 , AVERAGE VALUE,t_l._�:: .:..r._y �J:� r.:? ca., .: =1• ��. �cr •_.J„ �• 26 rlV::_Rt-1l.:E .I-'ERt:::I:=N t €tC•if:= 28 4 21 4. 1 7 .2. 6. - 1. .._.._ 0. 4 5. 9 MAXIMUM. VALUE •__'.., 13 . 60 :C r�J' 14. :i.:;=:' 23 7. 9. 88 MINIMUM VALUE 11 . : :1 4 2. 5 rr 2. 6 !:-. 4 2. 7 1 . 3 ... ,. y 5. 2 48 DEPICTED IN FILMS. • le 12 15 9 , 8 14 3 1. _ :2, 5 2 le 0 NO SPECIFIED':( .1:i::f:? ANATOMICAL:.Ji'I :.t.::r` l_.: AREAS 1 t.31'E::a:3.1:F"is l:z , ff.)l'y'l i:,ir Ci!''?1:t:"i`t 1.... (1 RE:{.'a c:i FI``r. TIE i11 AL' Hill: I't: tat.JR=i.i :. r, . I it;1t''(t`;,iE::Jttl.., II\/TIE,•'C":0:.. .:, i-. 1. L...I i;E: I f_J i:'•� ;,"1-C�(...1 - F::I:::.1__1_..A-i—_fi CD • E3i'1:":IVE::S 1:I\1 `: 1: t''I..iF:::i.1-1..:(: l..., -:I > iPtlr��,l.... I 1 1..I.IwR.C'11.i R:�:>F::: • t'1f'T, 81 E..,. 1::: . I , 1: 1.I I ". :31_:.:, A1..:..i..l.Il.. ii <:, tci(1:(:�ts i`I('i3t::3t: 1'1 'fll;i, CI 1.31:7:1\1 E. E.. i-n ._, R()PE: \e:C E.I(..,.I:: f+ C.:,:::. , E1...:r:::,1::1;-;r '1-x:l11::' 1. 1..:'C::C:3!'ast 1\It^A`I�1:C:?i`'•1: k:ii�' r.:i1:'r'9Ca1,.:�t:" 1:::I L._I''1 -I'1: 1"(:..F�: . : '.> l f;I; ..i_ .,r.:..i !_+I-' i :1:loll ...1-,.1.�1:::1E :% :0E.:Fi t: F:e. i��..1-.l C31\1 , 1: L..-a'I'::1:::: ..I..t Ii(tr�..l..(�'1 Y(•',.5 3::'.1 '-' ._ ' :::':a ' 8 i''l i'i:.l.':l.I::I•..lrz, Tiff'':(./'L._A I E:(i .Ir:I i"t_i-t::'1'-i i::::U .3 L.,1.l: l:. 1-0 I8.1 A C31...1 • • • .:-r 1::!...(:-.) _ i ,.', : '7 • Ill iy iy A,•i/ alRE -C:1-.1 It.i I:.1" CC . 'S •:1:• .l....1:F::Ec.: ..i..ft IAATC:'F"1 •.:,:? ' :n;.?, is 1-.7.t.: -•,... ;: t..--_r-:,_1ES ..,:. , ' 3 ,,' .3. 4 F,::III. P.:..: 11Ai'•ai131=?,.::.Trl...lE:1`•:I ,Ea.]l°;', i::'i...11 ,:; ' .E' 1....I 1'::(�': 17!3 I5.'(-11-C!-•1 ;t.:f. , . •I•::: 4e ��� L..t••�{..1F;;r-o I' I_IF(a' ..I"I I i, ..1..IM'1...1 ¢l r: '•. d:l.."I' - , 2 ,.,.: ,.. 1.,::l: (:''.1_;,E ' +... - . I LIKE TO WATCH 44, ' 4,' i: zl. , ... t E 11 F:.,)A T C1-1 4.74 E 3 . 1. ' ° 1. 4 I i:11 t:31:::E I C:'1-1 L:e,.l:'i::.,P:11.11- ,::1 I,A 171 :I:L C 1.._:I F I: f"0 I-A'T t: 1'-I - • ` ' 4E3 ., • 49} I (I'1. . T I.._1:1•1:FW .1..t::1 ix.1A. C31-l. Ll..1.9' :;.1t:' - `:r • :3 .l.a... 1..--i=`t?.11 i:()-„.1._:1;1';I J„::E I il:-.'H..l..F-.,CV ii:1A.1..(::'.1:.iE.: :i : I L,::CF.E.... -1 C3 14A..1-C:H • 1::>8 .:.) :1. 5 , 1•5 1101\l''I"Ai:3.,L._i• I_(1 n'i_:[('J3'A 1.),1A I.C.31711Eca' I. L_.1:F(l I'0 .I.),:.' lt:::'I-.( /r; . 4 i... E: (- .� 1,..1,:_ L ,-I ••��, r,.1 �.. • f r. 1"i:C F•,,-. t`•i 1'.i(1, .C31•I i=?NI I.i>? 1 LF:� t:_ t f r: :1 a f::'1', - '' 1._.1:II-(E.: 'I o .14()-I C:'1.1 -• :�`1 s �' • -( -t 1. • T. I.-,.:(:i<;F • ..(..tlIli;i•I Is(( • : .'' ` : �''sr :s8t�; 1 ' .:1 .1 : I"'1E.E:IT';i l lC=:: �.��1 �:iRE::`3E3-:r".N,1t-a P. 0t�3t i 1_..i.1-:...:E. 7..i1 .I,\I A'T'I I-I t., r ::: - 13 :'j. l: •'._:L':C: -T CD IA ' . f:,: , '�;'�?... '7' • 9 ._ 'L_.()Lille, .:r=•�Hi) 1'°1:1 -: :KF:,. C i_:Ll':c 1"t:J i%d,=t"iC:;i...l 75. -. 0 A .. • +' i:_). t:IC3 qI:'E':C�:•I 1":':1:E:D :'= NIA!"i ON!I CALt.ii tl::AS . OH .,1-`1: t..•1.!•» ,I.L:J:: '::E.XI.J:;L. fRC' 1 !.. . . r.:,:a • . . 1: [:}PEC:I 1:::* . E:IJ .(':11�Ii•'-,"1»OM I CAL.: ACRE":i t 2 FIE'1'E IROSl:'X1.J AL. l N,I TER c0LiRSliE: 1.-1 t:11 0 SE. :1::1,:-.�f...: a:t d"I"E-i=;C C tt..lF:i;I:i:: C;t.:1I\IN T`1....3:1\1G1_1E3 . I L.-..I•:::r:: '!-I I `:1;.1(':;'T»r':1...! - 6 [ I:: I...I..»r:.:i,".1•ii.. SC;E:E:I'IE�f" ;::.C3 ?-I"E_'1? '1�"'f - 7 ANI('`11.... :1:I�.!^E;E;I:C:'C:it.JE:;; ,E.. . ,)c;.._.:i;•'-P•'' -r''•b - - r; 1 .:)R': -»{....,f` ttl ' Si.._ 5 , -•,...: 11. , .!. i i • i . f• � .. � 1C._f t- . i 1�-1 1� �.C�` .i::,•. E"'r=�1��,_lt,,ll�"E�:'�. ` 9 ':;r' r;:rl-:i P'lr is iC:IC:a l.1. l"!,. ::;C 1::'1'�NE:- 1::::., -1" 1.{:'J .�-:=:'A'iP�'f:.i :V:Ct:;il.._I:NIC: E F.: L...(1E='f: :i: ..�..y lbll"": 1. 1. I.C:il`''! : :E I`•li"�"I':1:C if•I C":tl-"' t=tT C:.1�.�E :E I.._N T:1: ""!-L_1 , £ I(;E�r'T,'. '>a`'I'C:1I=' 'i I.PSIE .I,..`L I='1: . . , iu}EE3C:',I I F.' C:I l.il-I I. - i:"3 f{.:::1 . ; 1.4 r"I-C::Id ,. 2: •::, - ;, - . : 8 ' 'I• 1 L_1:E::;E:_ ..JrCJ P:`{(:7_l..C::I-d 3.1 ..... ,.„ :, ` :E I.»:1:I•.:E: i: 1}JA-r(:::h-1 . ��. I'r ._ �3 1 I i 1:li::E:::: TO Wr';`ITC:H ' : ;}1••8 • . •4. 1. 0 1. „ :1 . I L..I I:1= f O:, W,:t T C I...f 6 9 7 2 •:; 0' 4 . I L:E 1-:::E. "1iC3 1.A.1F TC:'1-1 - ;:iry; 79 . I:. '. • 0 :1 „ ... - , 1 E ! I L.i1 A--E.r _- :�0 83 0 '" I ` • • I - :E 1_..:E r::E= `I"C3 - (JA t C?I:.a •' , 7 9: aC;) ' ' I.' :I. ' 1. „ I:-,f:::E F,':C NIC.:, CJl'••I OE LL'..`•::`S.I NIG ROOM 1. ;,'- . .E 1^c,: _ "1" } i,JA_l..i;I-1 30. :I. . :1.: , ' :1. „ ... I•::::I:1'°1 & 1:'1A1'4/C•3Etil=-:_I C»I E.NI tAJi C1--iE::':a T I...:E!•::a; -t.,":t`- '►iJ As 1 C::1:i .- E:'B ; r;9 ':.. . ', :. ' 1. `.; ' 1' e-1 C'`;�n 1 !_.;)''• : ,_? 1:1•.__...i.-: 8 ....c.-• .!. .I. ' ' `�''. i 1 Ci 1':f"1""! ('t ,!t i l.'!'...:i:1'11"�t ,1 ! � {-!I:a::... 1: I •I i::E.'` , 'I»r ! - `�:: •..t:;,:`; . . cr AURA •\II••, I. • '...#�.' : .. � '.. '�'' � L._(..».fart t'-t! ,.! {'''i:i::�'!'w ._1,::E.: 'T..J W f- T C!-! 42 1 4 ; - .,::. 3 i,` •_' .,:», : r'•.._ I ��; C.'»I .i� 1 a E NI I 1....:I:KE E. _r-C:i CA.1ATC.::I•i. - 4•,. .4 - .,-, ` .;J. . :1. „ ... P.:1:i'�1,C:i�1?i:=:"f'C:::1.-1E.:Nl i 1..:.i`1LiR..A t•AJ(�"I»C:::I-HIS:'3 . T. r E: CC. i4"' , C • 49. •' r•8 i '9'., 3 12.•L...A1..i RA,I....INIDA/1"li 1NITAC3 1WA"I-C:I_HES , . 1.i':; , E i� It, ,::3 4.2 . 4 5. , t._I •1 .N '1 I'�.7 'S F-:' ,:rr:E "S .[ �._.:E!-`�: .»I'...: i r�t"h C�l...i � .. �; t.._,.:.t E�:(- .. ; ,....� !,.?.r=� r t l' ! E::.:.: I1__1:1'::F ..i_0 t1:4'T C:i.'1 15 21 ' t'_' ' . ' : 63' .itl r:t»I,.:C E31-.1A MAN II L.1.'11:.11=i=., 1:.1.f -1-c Id 1.-' .E I...:1:I::h::: - E-iM:t r...i t !:I"t . "�'f=: ' .w, '� t, ..,:..„ ' :I h' <:, � t..,i •�.», L:'•_.: �._ , (-r . t.-,E�:E.;. i il.._ . i t ::.:t 1 :I. 1. % - r. TO .WATCl l 3:I : '. 7 4 1-::.I El ;z, 1 1A NI/C_,E:;;j...l..t2PENI tjJt"t'i C.::I•-11:='_; ,». `: 7.^ ._,.�..., E3 E3 3'� `' i ;C I--:I:l'.l:i:: 'fC:J tl:!(l:T'��r-! '' , :�:' !':�+ :. t;1:1•�:a=.;!i::Ll�l:di��!'lC:ii�.l ,< ANNa'i t::; .„, I L_:EIN::E TC1 14A-I-C I-I ,'•:::a" 1.00 :X,': . ` NO SPEC!FJED ANATOMICAL AREAS ' OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1SPECIFIED ANATOMI.CAL AREAS '2 HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 1 HOMDSSUAL rNTERCOURSE ~ 4 MASTURBATI[UN ' ^ G UE� � BODIES IN- HPAT ' '� � 6 FELLATIO ^ SCENES IhSFQUENTIAL �. . ' ^ � 7 ANAL INTERCOURS�� ORDER 8 MORE THAKAO SEX POTNERS . ^ , 9 SADO `MASO ISM � � '' ''` SCENE E. T. . 16 RAPE/V�OLE` E ' ELA�SE TIME' � itCOMBINA | ION81]F ABOVE` _ FILM TITLE , |S' ART STOP TIME TYPE � % � � DESCRIPTION ' -=-------�--,�+ ----------�-------�-�-_--'--_--- --. ..... BODIES INH ` AT ` �� . ^ () 2 7/ 0 2. 7 � BODIES IN HEAT 2 4 ` 2 � 1 2.7 STRIp FOR LINc-UP ' BODIES IN EAT �� � . 4 5 1 6 1i4 DETECTIVE & PROSTITUTE BODIES IN HEAT ` .� 5 , 6 ` ' 1 71 . 4 DE | ECiIVE. & PROSTITUTE BODIES IN HEAT ^ ' ' � 6' 8 '� 2, 7 2. 7DFTECTIyE. & PROSTITUTE ` � BODIES .IN HEAT 10 0 14 � BODI IN f1EAT . � � 1� 1� ' 1 4 � �4 HARRY &.LYNN BODIESrm HEAT � � V 119 21 7 6 2. 7 HAR^ Y �& LYNN BODIES IN HEAN 21 J 3 5 4, l MHRMy & LYNN ' BODIES ' . IN HEAT - ' 24 �6 �_ . 7 7 2. T HARRY & LvNN ' ` BODIESAWHEAT' �' 26 30 4 b 5.4 i THE 'S BODIES IN HEAT � 30 ���� �� 4. -� . 2 � DESALVO . _ BODIES IN HEAT ` 33 , 37 ' 4 4 5. 4 LAURA & HARRY, IN SHOWERS / B00IE8 IN �HEAT ( � 37 44 4 0 5. 4 � BODIES IN HEAT ' ' ` 41 51 10 14 HARRY & LAURA, BODIEE} IN 'HEAT ` 51 , 55 0 0 5. 4 BODIES. IN .HEAT� 55 `57 `� 2 8 '2, T` � 7 DEPARTMENT POOL ARTY BODIES IN HEAT 57 64 ' 7 2 9. 5 DETECTIVF & WOMAN. . . BODIES IN 'HFAT 64 66 ` 2 7 2'. 7 DETECTIVE &..WOMAN, BODIES IN HEAT 66 74 8 0 11 BODIES IN HEAT , ' 74 100 % ` � ' , ` ^ ` ^ ` ^ ' ` ` ' ` ` ' ` ' . ` ` ` ^ ` t:y I'',IC:i E31-'F:i:[::I 1.47:1:1 1 • O Nit''i..l..f_!I"f.a:f.=A1.... AF.:+'.!:AE:.3 i OR iiiF'i:i::::1:F':(I::i:? SEXUAL ACTIVITIES :I: f:l-'EC:::1:F'T,"F:IJ ANATOMICAL (';La:'t','(3 I-'IE: ! EFSC.0Sfr'X 1(iL._. _F h,,..1..1.-R(::1.31.._1RE:51: /.1• 11A S"1-.L.)I:7.r_3,?"i-:1::[311: r:�' .. ' 1 11 C.:1..I r,11',•1 ...1. `�I C=;i..1.:3 13['31?I ES, .E NI Fir"i''i•'ly c':D F'E:L.1.._i:.:i •T 0 SCENE.s s:i1� "1_E.D 1 : t21N1 A i.... I hti"!1 174-..C::l'1U :.:S1: . • ' ACT rka`1.'1-Y 1-''(F='(:: , • - 8 I''it:,i 1:: '•i'1'_!Pf:i "n,iu SE X 1:=t.;1:,;1..i\:LE:R;.:3 . 9 S(�:E:I(:1 11�,SC3r":I'-1:1::::3is- - .;CF:.i"�,lEc. I..^ T::: . :I:t:i 14".ff- Ft:'F:=,`I)1 01....F-N(..r1E. F:I....A 1:::'SE: F•1:ME: :I. J. 1::t".:il`'1:1: :f.1.lA_I.::!:(:11-":.18 OF ",.,80 VE. •--. s_1- 1•.I • , p:: , A/,- „! D G::•C:,F:.,.. �-:1 O. s' t- .tl._1'I '1"L1"L.�(=: ;,� . AR 1- ,.aT..F�' I":' IF:: , , i•-'Lr :: ...L..,..,�._.,ti 1.F-'", . .!!� '' I:3i3 :E 1 -c i i ! 0 ._:. ,., f_, :. (:it i::l ID 1.P�.Y 1:N. 1-1 E. -1- 4 1". . 4. f) 5 41. . 1301:f 1:EE:3 1:11 1-1Ei...; I' ,tY 7n1:' ., 8 0 .. :1. /1.3 Y. 131::3DiE1 IN HIE.:t-t"! - 4 1. :. ,r , STRIP F-1:::IF: 1__1:1,,1E..._t.if I?;1:3DIIE I1\"1 1-11,EA-1- . :: :L - 1. „ ="1. 1:;":1E:C:"1 :I V . 1=:°RCEirr:F1•'!..I1-I=: 13[3 D T r' .I N 1-1E1:1 1. .4 _ F-I A I::;:I::.,,.r & ,`i`11N .I+,0D:1 , _11 i... '_ .'C? ,.i.;.: ._ 4„•1. rI"11:. pE.;r.?At_:•,)t.:J •a ' • . Dot)1:,...,,-.Y 1.I J I i,-'. 1 1" •, .i. E',1 1. 1.0 ::. :!. .1 I••1 i'-1 F:i Wr' f:f' i7 T i-�..;: , Fir-.......AT • •_. �1. , .." ., .� 17':.. • 1•'' 'i• ... CA;1 I,1 F^ �, s�:... .. ._.. .F•t.l l-1i::.r•-, !, ,..: � •� „ .. L._.I E:_.,.,•I"..:%I:: ,:, ::f`i. �I f BODIES IN HEAT 16 19. 1 4 1 . 4 HARRY & 1_..YNN ,HEAT a__; ,:�;„ ,! 1 I... R,,• 0I !�.M-. ... BODIES 1:1',1 .: .: .. ,.r. •L 4 :. =1• L._(•'._!I:'t i-•. .: l i=?I::�;.:i;'r :E h,.l r.:r l._i_..:,,.-I-�;::: • 1.3[31)I ••L, ! 11 1 I � ! "?i_I. . !.- -4 „ 1. F")•••il F'i T 1....Y I'tihi . .- 13 01:>It.s :I N HEAT ,T. • 5 1. ,', :1. „ /.1. DF,"rEC: I":Gv1: ,•< F'R:3S.1-I"T!_J;1- T 0I:)4:ES I.N H E(',T 1:. :2:i. ... ,(., .,T HA I.: R•-.,1 .i....`11\1 I' '0t'1:i::. = 8 2 . ' r'• , -l:1F=."i",::1 I:'I'.:'I�: b: I='I:�'i:li:�"F•:F•1- !I , {_,., "f' YF:. ! 1....C.:..! 1... it• WOMAN -_'O D I i'.:. I i',"1 H F::.("� I f:Y E' 6 6 :. ., .. /� S I 5. I - y �.L1.31;•:::; 11`d I-',I:a''� , ._!,_! "_r. .,._ ��i• ..._ , ', f li:F=t=11=..:i�'I-•'1�F i`,1 1' P.::.0 i__ F='A F;i"1'r' i C31:?1:Iic:::3 :111 H I:A T -41. 1.t:y t:i '4 . ! ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY SUMMARY OF FILMS SHOWN AT THE RENTON THEATER ! TYPE FOR ALL AVAILABLE FILMS | i PERCENTAGE OF FILM SCENES BY ACTIVITY TYPE BY FILM FILM FILM TITLE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1-11s _______________________________________________________________________________ 1 DEEP THROAT 37 16 10 6 23 7. 3 62. 9 2 DEVIL IN MISS JONES 30 11 2. 2 19 16 4. 5 10 4. 9 2 9 ^ 0 3 BLUE JEANS 35 7. 8 21 4 1 12 20 ~ ^ ' ^ ^ 65 4 NAUGHTY NETWORK 40 3. 6 16 14 6. 9 4-- 5-- 4. 8 5 7 60. 5 5 AMERICAN DESIRE 40 14 1 . 6 6. 3 8' - 9' ' ~ 5 7 4 6 5 59^ 7 6 AMERICAN GIRLS 44 17 4. 1 ' � ' - ^ ^ ^ . 35 56. 1 7 FOXHOLES 51 9. 9 4-7 1� 4 9 14 ^ ^ ^ � ^ 49 8 RANDY 36 18 1 � - 13 �. � 4-� 8 5 5. 1 64 9 SOUNDRELS 43 4. 9 19 4. 5 -1 ' 5^ - ^ 0 ` 3. 1 57. 3 10 FOXTROT 37 19 3. 2 8. 4 7. � ' - 2. 4 7^9 3^ 2 11 IRRESISTABLE 50 11 9 2. 5 5. 3 6. - - - 1 8^ 4 ^ 3 "" 12 SHEHEREZADE 1001 ETC 30 14 18 7. 4 9. 8 1- ^ 1 70��� 13 SATISFACTIOAS 39 6. 9 18 2 3 9 ` ^2 ^ � 14 PANDORA 'S MIRROR 49 3~3 6. 7 3. 6 4 2. �� 6^ � 1 . 1 �4 5. 7 4. 1 5161 15 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 31 23 6. 3 6. 8 4. ' ' - ^ 1 1 ^ 4 ^ 69^ " 16 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS II 27 11 12 17 4. 2 1 . � 8-- ^3 ^ 5. 7 ��� 17 LITTLE GIRLS LOST$ 62 5 13 0 6 5 - ' � 5^2 ^ �" ^ ^ � 38 18 RING OF DESIRE 41 10 Z � 5 2 ' - - � ~^ � �u . ' 6 58. 7 19 THE DANCERS ' 40 ��5 22 - - 2. 2 59^ 6 20 BETWEEN THE SHEETS ^ 21 DADDY 'S LITTLE GIRLS 45 9. 5 11 6. 1 5. 6 18 4. 2 54 9 " 22 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 11 2. 9 3. 9 6. 8 9. 3 46 ^ � 9 23 EVERY WHICH WAY SHE CAN 26 10 21 5. 2 7. 2 21 6. 9 3 743 24 NIGHT LIFE 20 10 16 10 3 1 . 9 14 3. 8 19 ^ 0 25 EXPOSE ME NOW 49 2. 2 20 3. 1 5. 5 4. 6 14 0. 9 508 26 STORMY 24 3. 2 15 6. 6 2. 8 8. 2 37 3. 2 ^ �6 27 YOUNG DOCTORS IN LUST 18 11 3. 7 0. 9 0. 6 4. 7 59 1 . 4 ~0. 6 �2 28 INTIMATE EXPLOSIONS ^ 29 UP AND COMING 62 5. 7 2. 8 5 3. 9 7. --. 13 38 31 PUSS & BOOTS 30 INSATIABLE 42 6. 7 a / � 5 5 7^ 8 58^ 1 32 SEDUCTION OF WNW 31 2. 6 12 1 13 69 33 PEEPHOLES 47 1 . 9 22 1 ] `\ / 7. 2 3 8 53 34 BODY TALI:'.* ^ 35 LITTLE GIRLS BLUE II 36 BEST OF ALEX DE RENZy ` 37 TINSEL TOWN � 36 3. 2 18 64 1 38 PRINCESS SEKA 40 6. 3 8. 2 / ^�� ` Y�t�\ �1 . 9 23 3 6 3 � 0 39 SKIN DEEP 17 20 3. 2 ' - ^ ~ 40 BABE 50 5 5 ^ �� 'V^ U l/ 2^ 3 83 . 17 ~ 41 DOING IT 8 1? 9. 5 501 50 3. 29 �50 42 BABY CAKES 46 6. 4 544 43 NASTY GIRLS ^ ^ 44 LITTLE DARLIN 'S 39 5. 1 25/ ~ ' 1 . 6 61 4 45 SAN FERNANDO VLY GIRLS 30 4. 6 20/ . -- -� y 2. 2 9. 4 0. 9 ^ �0 46 BRIEF AFFAIRS 41 1 . 8 13 9. � '��. "- 6 1O 59' 1 47 HOT DREAMS ^ 48 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 54 23 9. 6 4. 1 2. 5 6. 6 46 49 MEMPHIS CATHOUSE BLUES 31 4. 1 11 5. 2 3 22 18 5. 1 1 . 1 69 3 ^ 50 COUNTRY COMFORT 41 11 14 2. 9 4 14 14 ^ ^ 59 4 51 LUCIOUS ^ 52 ANGEL CASH 29 8. 2 17 2. 8 6. 4 0. 8 1 . 1 33 2. 3 71 4 53 DEVIL IN MISS JONES II ^ 54 GREATEST LITTLE C/HOUSE 17 3. 1 13 19 35 6. 4 6. 4 83 55 TABOO 37 15 13 1 . 3 2. 1 13 18 63 56 TABOO II 36 12 20 6. 1 0. 4 0. 4 9. 4 16 64. 7 57 EAT AT THE BLUE FOX ^ 58 JUSTINE-MATTER INNOCENT 45 15 4 4. 7 8. 5 7. . 15 55. 1 59 BUBBLE GUM 27 21 16 8. 8 14 1 � 73^ 4 - ~ 60 SCANDALS OF LYDIA LACE 32 6. 3 5. 4 3. 2 8. 1 . 8 43 � 8 61 TAKIN ' IT TO THE MAX 52 3. 9 9. 2 8 3. 8 it 3. 3 9 482 62 TITILLATION 39 24 5. 9 12 9. 8 8. 6 ~61 63 NAUGHTY GIRLS 40 10 12 14 4. 1 5. 1 15 602 64 SHEER PANTIES 24 12 15 13 4 7. 3 0. 6 23 76 ____________________________________________________________ ---------- AVERAGE VALUE 38 9. 1 14 7. 9 4. 7 5. 5 11 4. 8 16 3. 5 4. 8 3. 7 62. 2 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE 38 7. 4 14 6. 3 2. 6 4. 5 10 1 . 7 14 0. 7 0. 7 0. 8 62. 2 MAXIMUM VALUE 62 35 35 19 13 14 28 37 59 7. 4 6. 5 7. 8 B3 MINIMUM VALUE 17 1 . 8 2. 2 1 . 6 0. 4 0. 4 0. 8 0. 6 3 0. 9 1 . 4 0. 6 38 DEPICTED IN FILMS 53 43 51 42 29 44 51 19 45 10 8 11 " r�IJI411°1f3F�Y l i E :I:I .h'1�3 C FfC)1�1f•{ (t"1 THE F:E=11"r'tlf�l THEATER f1"f CWIry: , ' PERCENTAGE ra-i-r"GE: U1= f=-'i L.N! s:�rrf'lr r1:3- BY AC1-T V I TY TYPE �r i-:11....M F•I!._.H I=T 1....11 T I:1-L_.E 0 ' 1. DrEE l .;'IHI fl 7l :37 , 1. ..:, 1.0 6 23 7„ .3 1Ot:r, .2 DEVIL. '11\1 MISS 30N1115 30 1. 1 ? 19 16 4.5 10 4„ 9 _„ 9 . 1 00 x3 BLUE: JEANS :3;5 7, 8 2'1. 4. 1 ' 1.2 20. 1.00 - i NIrAL.l !•-ITY' NETWORK. 40 3. . 16 14 6. 9. . r' 5.. 4 4. 8 5. 7 :i.c..)ti- . -`_=, A ME t 1:CAN DF Ei l:R 4.0 '- :L 4.: 1. . r 6„ 13„ 9 9„ 8 ,5 7. 4 4 6. 5 100 _'., AMERI CN 1.3.1.RI_..5 /1/1 17• 4. :L ..5 . , - ;l rjc ti 7' 'fOXHCL.E`S 51. 9. 9 -„ 7 1.5 4. 9 .. 14 100 8 RANDY 6 1.8 ' 1;: . 1.3 2. 7 4. 2 - 8. 5 5„ 1 10 ) ,/c; r_,Ol_ll`:I.O?F:E:L." ; .. . 43 '1 „ r 19. 4„ ;•i 1 1. w5„ 1. :I.0 . . 3. • 100 10 FOX TROT . . , _ 7 • 19 3„ ',2 8„ 4 7„ ca :L 1 2 -1 7„ 9 s. 100 . ✓11.. IRREr ISTABLE . . 50 :1. :1. 9 2, 5- 5„ 3 car„ 5 _. 1 8„ 4 3 1C..0 • „} S._ _. :. :,,Z,, : ' :3'Y ' '1 1.£3 7. 4 9„ 8. 10 . 1. 1. - . '' 1.cj0, .,..,.: ��1 !I_..1 !I�I,I�.,..r'�I��E:� 1,c"at���:l. E". i C� .�,c� .1.'.. 1. SAT Tr3FACTI01\1S-: , • ; :3;9 6. 8 1.8 • 3 r?„ 1. • ,''.:. :I.csc'r 111 F ANDOF-i 'S. N E F ROR 4 _ „ _ ..6.„ 7' = „ 6 4. 2„ •7 6.„ :L 1. „ 1. 14 '5.„ ^I•'. 1 100 ,/ 15 :o :a.I1=: 150E 3 r) •tI._:I....A ; . 3:I. 23 6„ !: 6„ C 4„ 7 . 1 r.':;' . . 1 :1. :1 „ =1 - 1.0'0- 1.6 I;EBB1111 1I:•1EH3 DAL I__r'1C• E l . 27 I. 1 ' 1:2 ' 1 7 4 1.„ '3 C„ I 1 :3 - 5„ 7 1•iy0 ✓ 1. 7 L...I T T L..F r,1.RI.._`:` 1-"0$T '` 62. 1.::,.. 0„ P C„ n C „ 2 , 1.00- 18 R:ENG OF. DESIRE '. r . 41 . 10 .. 28 5. 2 " 9 r:, 100 19 THE DANCERS , 40' 1:5 2 •, . :I c„}c-) 20 BETWEEN THE '' 1-11=«EETES t_y : . ✓21. DADDY ',S Li "r•-1L..t~ PisRL_.F.3 45 9„ 5 _• ':L 1. 6„ 1. r" „ t':, 1.8 . 4„ 2 1.00 v.. L_I"I--I"I_E_ FRENCH .MA:C P. 1 ,`' 9' •3. 9 6„8 9; 3 46 100 '.._.,. -EVER`c: 1,,JH I CFI Nf1Y SHE CAN 26 10, ' .::1. 5„ ,' ....'7 I, ..21. 6„ 9 _. - 1.0'0 .,/J'1 !'aIGHI" I.._'.(El .20 11' 1.6 10} • ._ 1 „ 9 1./I. t3 19 1c 0 o F XF cr_=. ME NC:OW ' /I.0 .',:'„ ."I ' _0 „.1. . 5. 5- S7••„ r.`-a - . . 1.LI 0. 100 0 . 26 STORMY;� . ' - c:a . ''7. YOUNG DOCTORS I N. LUST: . i r 2E3 .T,111":C I'4n T E L X,E L_CJC31:'CJNS • ' . 0 v/ nr..; UP AND COMING C '2 5. 7 .; 8 5„ „ c9 7„ ' 1:3 1.i)c:> 0 1:i'ISA:.I.:I A BI_F. . - ;-, vim_ 0 • Y/2 SEDUCTION! OF C:CNDY ' "::l „ ,.. 12 13: :' 1. n 9 ' 15 4. 1 1.3 Zia,0 ✓_:::: F'EIF'HOL:.EIS 47 1. „ 9 • '•',2. 1. „H 7„ 0. 5; 6 "12 7. • 7„ :. „ 8, : 1.03 "/: .BODY 'TALK ° ci ,/ i I ITT :.E SIR!__r�; ' 3L.UL:-. T 1: , • , ;; 3:6 BEST CiE •Al_E7. 'DE F:1+NZY-• 0 / 37 TINSEL TOWN • . • t=f / :_'!' 3 , C_''3 .S._1.:• - f Y _ u n.' : 89. 4 i ,.0 . ,2" - A.. " �/ .:.I:: PR �c._,•...r-', �x.� �;„ � _.3„ 1 „ �„ ��1 ..w „ y . ..a„ :� 1.1;:� / :9 SF�::is N DEEP 17 .0 , 1 ._ 9 4. 6 2:8 r:r„ 8 . 17 '.a. ... 100 ✓ 4,0 BABE 50 ...!„ ,.! 1'i 2. 3 ... „ 6 7. 1 _,; 3. 9. 5 - 100 ✓ `I 1. DO I NC" T T ' 50 ".. „.8 1. - . - J . 29 , , 100 .✓ 42 BABY C. ::f" E3 - 46 `=i 5. 135, `1',, 9 :a„ -�'1 :I.'c:IL) 43 NASTY S:r.Fil....S • - . - . c.). ✓ I'I• .L_I«i-"I"L_E AM...:C N ' • . - :39 J 25' -� 5, , „ 1. !" I,,. 4 „ i !„ 14 1 . 6 100 ✓ 45 SA NI' F ER NAANI:r C3 VL Y r,I R1,._s 3:0 4 „ 6 _'c? 9„ 1 . 4„ 6 1 A, ? „4_;, .0,; 91�:)t„}. ✓s:I.,, BRIEF r1rr'f--11 RS 'I•.l 1 „ " 13, 9„ .« „ 7 1'9 6 L 0 1 Of.")�:1.7 HOT DREAMS:? 0 .4 45 C. I ET•Y' AFFA IRS . 5 "9. 6 ` 7 /4„ 1. : " 6,,6' 1.00 J'49 MEMP1-1 I S- CATHOUCE BLUES • 31 4„,1 11 5„ 2 . ��%'. 18 `5,1. 1 „ :L 1.06 r�0 COUNTRY . COMFORT - :).; `,1. L...C.1w;TOL1 ; . c�� 5:3 ,DEVI..L_ :I:IF! MI:SS' :7-r11'•IEFS 1: T. • • . ' 5/!• (31 EATFC-I" 1_•TTTLE `C,HOUSE . TABOO I I. -• S- . 57 E.AT t1T ,Ti-iE F'!._.L.lE- rr..:„l?{ 1 -I_..OVE: IN STRANGE I L.:ACES • ;,1. , . - - ��� . � ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY SUMMARY OF FILMS SHOWN AT THE RENTON THEATER ( TYPE FOR ALL AVAILABLE FILMS � | PERCENTAGE OF FILM SCENES BY ACTIVITY TYPE /BY FILM FILM FILM TITLE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1-11s -------------------------------------------------------------- I DEEP THROAT ' 37 16 10 6 23 7, 3 62. 9 2 DEVIL IN MISS JONES 30 11 2. 2 19 16 4. 5 10 4. 9 2. 9 �0 3 BLUE JEANS 35 7. 9 21 4 1 12 20 ^ ' ^ ^ 65 4 NAUGHTY NETWORK 40 3. 6 16 14 6. 9 4. 5 5-' 4. 8 5. 7 60. 5 5 AMERICAN DESIRE 40 , 14 1 . 6 6. 3 8' 9 9' � 5 7. 4 6. 5 59^ 7 6 AMERICAN GIRLS 44 17 4. 1 ' - 35 56^ 1 7 FOXHOLES 51 9. 9 4 7 15 � 4 9 14 ^ ^ ^ ^ 49 8 RANDY 36 18 12 - - 13 �. + 4-� 8. 5 5. 1 64 9 SOUNDRELS 43 4. 9 19 4. 5 -1 � 5' - 10 ^ 3. 1 57. 3 10 FOXTROT 37 19 3. 2 8. 4 7. 6 ' � 2. 4 7. 9 3^ 2 ^ 3 11 IRRESISTABLE 50 11 9 2. 5 5. 3 6. 5 - - 1 8. 4 ^ 3 �0 12 SHEHEREZADE 1001 ETC 30 14 18 7. 4 9. �� 1 - 11 70~2 13 SATISFACTIOAS 39 6. 8 18 2 - 9. ` 22 �1 14 PANDORA 'S MIRROR 49 3. 3 6. 7 3. 6 4 2. 7 6. 1 1 . 1 14 5. 7 4. 1 51~3 15 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 31 ` 23 6. 3 6. 8 4. � 1 � 11 1 ^ 4 69^ 2 16 DEBBIE DOES DALLAS 11 27 11 12 17 4. 2 1 . 8. - 13 ^ 5. 7 ^ 3 17 LITTLE GIRLS LOSTA 62 5 13 0. 6 5. - - 5. 2 ~ ' �8 18 RING OF DESIRE 41 10 28 5. 2 - � 6 58"7 19 THE DANCERS / 40 35 22 2 2 � ^ . 59 6 20 BETWEEN THE SHEETS �� - - ^ 21 DADDY 'S LITTLE GIRLS 45 9. 5 11 6. 1 5. 6 18 4. 2 54 9 22 LITTLE FRENCH MAID 11 2. 9 3. 9 6. 8 9. 3 46 ^ ^ 9 23 EVERY WHICH WAY SHE CAN 26 10 21 5. 2 7. 2 21 6. 9 3 74"3 24 NIGHT LIFE 20 12 16 10 3 1 9 14 3 8 19 ^ ^ ^ 80 25 EXPOSE ME NOW 49 2. 2 20 3. 1 - -. 4- � - - ^ ' 0. 9 50 8 26 STORMY 24 3. 2 15 6. 6 �. 8 8' 2 37 3^2 ^ �6 27 YOUNG DOCTORS IN LUST 18 11 3. 7 0. 9 -. � 4'�� ^�� 1 4 0 6 �2 28 INTIMATE EXPLOSIONS ' - ' ' ~ ' ^ ^ " 29 UP AND COMING 62 5. 7 2. 8 5. 3 3. 9 7. 3 13 38 30 INSATIABLE 42 6. 7 7. 5 8. 2 2. 1 7. 3 12 1 . 5 5 7 8 58 1 31 PUSS & BOOTS ^ ^ 32 SEDUCTION OF CINDY 31 2. 6 12 13 7 1 . 9 15 4. 1 13 69 33 PEEPHOLES 47 1 . 9 22 1 . 8 7. 8 5. 6 2. 7 7. 2 3. 8 53 34 BODY TALK ^ 35 LITTLE GIRLS BLUE II + 36 BEST OF ALEX DE RENZy ` 37 TINSEL TOWN 36 3. 2 14 8. 1 7. 2 4. 4 9. 2 18 641 38 PRINCESS SEKA 40 6. 3 8'. 2 1 . 8 9. 4 1 . 9 23 3 6 3 � 0 " 39 SKIN DEEP 17 20 3. 2 3. 1 3. 9 4. 6 28 0. 8 17 2. 3 ^ �3 40 BABE 50 5. 5 17 2. 3 3. 6 7. 1 5. 1 9. 5 ~ 501 � 41 DOING IT 50 ,3. 8 12 5 29 �0 42 BABY CAKES 46 35 5. 6 2. 5 4. 9 6. 4 544 43 NASTY GIRLS ^ ^ 44 LITTLE DARLIN 'S 39 5. 1 25 6. 4 3. 7 5. 9 14 1 . 6 61 4 45 SAN FERNANDO VLY GIRLS 30 4. 6 20 9. 1 4. 6 19 2. 2 9. 4 0. 9 ^ �0 46 BRIEF AFFAIRS 41 1 . 8 13 9. 3 5. 3 3. 7 16 1O 59' 1 47 HOT DREAMS ^ 48 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 54 23 9. 6 4. 1 2. 5 6. 6 46 49 MEMPHIS CATHOUSE BLUES 31 4. 1 11 5. 2 3 2? 18 5. 1 1 1 69 3 , 50 COUNTRY COMFORT 41 11 14 2. 9 4 14 14 ~ ^ ^ 59 4 51 LUCIOUS ^ 52 ANGEL CASH 29 8. 2 17 2. 8 ^^6. 4 0. 8 1 1 33 2. 3 71 4 53 DEVIL IN MISS JONES II ^ ^ 54 GREATEST LITTLE C/HOUSE 17 3. 1 13 19 35 6. 4 6 4 83 55 TABOO 37 15 13 1 . 3 2. 1 13 18 ^ ^ 63 56 TABOO II 36 12 20 6. 1 0. 4 0. 4 9. 4 16 64 3 57 EAT AT THE BLUE FOX ^ 58 JUSTINE-MATTER INNOCENT 45 15 4 4. 7 8. 5 7. � 15 55 1 59 BUBBLE GUM 27 21 16 8 8 14 1 ' ^ . 4 73. 4 60 SCANDALS OF LYDIA LACE 32 6. 3 5. - �. �� - ' 8^1 1 . 8 43 ^ 8 61 TAKIN ' IT TO THE MAX 52 3. 9 9. 2 ' � - - 3. 8 ^ 1 3~ 3 9 48"2 62 TITILLATION 39 24 5 9 - 12 9-8 ^ 8 6 ^ . r . . 61 63 NAUGHTY GIRLS . 40 10 � 12 14 4-- ' . ~ �1~ 60 2 64 SHEER PANTIES 24 12 15 13 ' - -. - 0. 6 2~ ^ 6 ____________________________________________________________________-_____-____ AVERAGE VALUE 38 9. 1 14 7. 9 4. 7 5. 5 11 4. 8 16 3. 5 4. 8 3. 7 62. 2 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE 38 7. 4 ' 14 6. 3 2. 6 4. 5 10 1 . 7 14 0. 7 0^^ 7 0^^ 8 62^ 2 MAXIMUM VALUE 62 35 35 19 13 14 28 37 59 7. 4 6^ 5 78 ^ 3 MINIMUM VALUE 17 1 . 8 2. 2 1 . 6 0. 4 0. 4 0. 8 0. 6 3 0. 9 1 ^ 4 0^ 6 �8 DEPICTED IN FILMS 53 43 51 42 29 44 51 19 45 10 8 ^ ~ It , ' ' . ! SUMMARY OF FILMSSHOWN AT THE RENTON THEATER PERCENTAGE S ' OFFILM ,SCENE '6Y ACTIVITY TYPE BY FILM FILM FILM TITLE . 0 1 2 3 ,4 A 6 7 8 9' iO 11 TOTAL . -----------------�7------7-----------�������......Z.......��������������������� 1 DEEP,THROAT 37 16 10 6 �3' 7. 3 10(\ 2 DEVIL IN MISS `JOMES 30 11 2; 2 19 16 4. 5 10 4. 9 2. 9 100 V3 BLUE JEANS ' 35 7. 8 21 4. 1 12 70 ' 100 4 NAUGHTY NETWORK 40 3. 6 16 14 6. 9 4. 5 5. 4 4. 8 5. 7 100 5 AMERICAN' DESIRE 40 14 ` 1 . 6 6. 3 8. 9 9. 8 5 7. 4 6. 5 100 6 AMERICAN GIRLS 44 174. 1 35 10{r 7 'FOXHOLES 51 9. 9 4. 7 15 4. 4. 14 100 8 RANDY ' ` 36 18 ' 12 13 2. 7 4. 2 8. 5 5.j 100 //9 SOUNDRELS 43 4. 9 19 4. 5 11 5. 1 10 z 301 100 10 FOXTROT 37 19 3; 2 8. 4 7. 6 11 2. 4 7. 9 3. 2 100 ,'11 IRRESI T6BLE � 50 11 9 2. 5 5. 3 6. 5 3 1 8. 4 3 100 �12 SHEHEREZADE, 1001 ETC 30 14 18 7. 4 9. 8 11 100 10 � 13 SATISFACTIONS 39 6. 8 18 2 3 9. 1 ^' 22 100 / . 14 PANDORA SMIRROR 49 3. 3 6. 7 ��. 6 4 2. 7 6. 1 1 . 1 14 5. 7 4. 1 100 / 15 DEBBIE 'DOES DALLAS 31 23 6. 3 _ 6. 8 4. + 16 . 11 1 .4 � : 100 16 DEBBIE DOESIDALLAS It 27 11 12 17 4. 2 1 . 8 8. 1 13 5. 7 '/00 / 17 LITTLE GIRLS LOST -62 5 13 0. 6 5. 2 p 5. 2 100- 18 RING OF DESIRE 41 10 28 5. 2 9 6 100 19 THE DANCERS 40 35 22 2. 2 100 20 BETWEEN THE SHEETS ' � 0 ,/21 DADDUS LITTLE GIRLS ' 45 9. 5 11 A, 1 5. 6_ 18 4. 2 100 22 LITTLE FRENCHMAID ' 3124 3. 9 6. 8 9. 3 46 100 23 EVERY .WHICH WAY SHE CAN 26 10 21 5. 2 7. 2 21 6. 9 3 100 "' "24 NIGHT LIFE 20 12 � 16 � 0 3 1 . ��� 14 3. 8 19 100 � - � . /25 EXPOSE ME NOW � � 4q 2. 2 20 3.1 5. 5 4^ 6 14 0. 9 100 26 STORMY ^` 2f YOUNG DOCTORS ' IN LUSlF� ^/ � 8 INTIM 'fE EXPLOSIONS�' 0 � 29 UP AND COMING 62 5 7 2 8 5 3 3 9 7. 3 13 100 "/ . . . . ` 0 INSATIABLE � 0 0 31 PUSS & BOOTS ' 0 v/32 SEDUCTION DF CINDY 312. 6 12 13 7 1 . 9 15 4. 1 13 /'33 PEEPHOLES 47 1. 9 - 22 1 . 8 7. 8 5. 6 217 - 7. 1 3. 8, 100 ` 'v54 BODY TALK A �, , ` `_ . 0 , 35 LITTLE GIRLS BLUE 11 0 36 BEST OF ALEX DE RENZY , 0 .' 37 TINSEL TOWN � � ' . ` ' () 38 PRINCESS SEKA 40 6. 3 8. 2 1 . 8` 9. 4 '1 . 9 23 3 6. 3 100 ^39 SKIN DEEP 17 ' 20 3 2 3 1 � 9 4 6 28 0 8 17 2 3 100 / . . . . . . ,/ 40 BABE 50 05 17 2. 3 3. 6 711 5. 1 9. 5 100 41 DOING IT 50 3. 8 12 5 29 100 /'42 BABY CAKES ' 46 35 5. 6 2.3 4. 9 6. 4 100 43 NASTY GIRLS 0 / 44 LITTLE DARLIN 'S. 39 5. 1 256. 4 3. 7 5.9 14 ' � 1 .,6 100 / 45 SAN FERmANDO VLY GIRLS 304. 6 209, 1 , 4. 6 19 2. 2 9..40, 9 100 /46 BRIEF AFFAIRS 41 1 . 8 13 9. 3 5. 33. 7 16 ` ` '10 100 47` HOT DREAMS ' 0 4 48 SOCIETY AFFAIRS 54 23 9. 6 ' 4. 1 2�� 616 100 49 MEMPHIS CATHOUSE ! LUES 31 4. 1 1\ 5. 2 v' ' - '3 22 18 5. 1 1 . 1 100 ' ' ' . A _. r --- • . " .. • • • , " " .. , . " . .176 S "Z 9 '9 L "Z 6 "Z Z-S S 'L 2 "L or NOIIVIAM CPAUGNU.I.S CD 8 z. T2 2T g2 02 6T 8Z L2 Ti L2 SIAlid NI (13101d3G . T " T il " T 6 °0 2 80 / "Z 8 ' T 90 9 " T Z "Z 8 " T LT . Dn-IvA WANININ L i 5 "9 17 "/ 9V 2 "6 E3? ZT 2T 6T g2 S2 Z9 DA1VA kinwixvw TZT 2 '2 8 "V S '2 VT S '2 TT c..., 's 2 's V "L iT 68 OV 7:m7m 3on.law . g9 . t9 29 . • ,. . T9 SEIZITId -2.10NkidI3 NI 3A01 Bi X0A Einie ..][11 IV 1V3 Li II ooavi 9S . . • Ochavl c3ci /‘ .. .711.3n0H/0 E-IiII1 iTalt.....TD.-.19 VS . . II 83NOP SSIW NI iin3a 2g HSVD 139NV ZS/ o snol 3n1 Tg O nodwoo 1IIA03 OS , N .Vltwtht ti NRP7t: START TIME OF REVIEW: -! !% : Z!0 ! ! M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! !Z: 4 !'l ! M FILM TITLE: II _ ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE S MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE (TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION • I I I 1 II I I I I _-_ 1 I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIII . . ° .._. 7 . . . ° .1_2.. . 2 . •13. 1... 0 .1A_b_ ' c• L (• • .U% ` .I .14 • .c.Q . p. . . . . . . . I __ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1• __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 I .1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -`• S• cr--- • 1 _ •-- -- . R. 6.,� . . * . . .� . % . E. R . k o.®. . I I 1 I I 11 I 1 I __ 1 I _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3. �. ` .�,1 '0 • . 0 1 . 1 II I I I , __ I I __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 , , , 1 , __ , , __ , , I 1 , 1 , , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ I 1 __. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I I II I I I I __ I I -- I I I I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • ' •g.‘ . . . '. 0.0 • •O • I I I I II I I I I __ 1 1 __ I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 2 ®® Z ` ° - - •- _ L• T•g i d •-rji• 'e •-r I-1 IE A • •G I -R• L . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _- 1 1 -_ 1 , , , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 , , I I I 1 __ I , __ , , , , I I 1 1 I 1 I I i 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I , I I , I I I 1 _._ ,t./ I ___ I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • •1•1• ' I.3.5" • sr ----z G I R s * G °°` -y - --- -- 1 A 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 _._ 1 1 __ _ _�.3g. I . 2_Y_s.! . .! • • e.•6. ,. . S. , . •T! E M- ..p .E .® .It..L . �. . , I I I I , 1 1 1 I __ 1 i __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --_ 1 I __ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ I 1 __ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I__ 1 1 __ I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ! I 1 , I 1 __ 1 1 __ 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 II I III __ 1 1 --. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II 1 1 1 1 __ 1 i __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • NtV i tWEK-5 NAME: • START TIME OF REVIEW:-! !. : 4,!s! ! M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! !4: t 2..! ! M FILM I I I'TITLE 5., "II I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I. 1 I I I• 1 I 1 I I • -r 'it;E r '°r.y .,� L.4. c. H E S _ ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= . 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS • 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS t 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE . (TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION I I I I II I 1 I 1__ 1 1__ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1•11 . 5_ • 2.g.s. . 6 . 1 1 I I . . 1 1 , 1-_ 1 1-_ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .�c.5. . .3 .® .Z . • 1 . !.j,! 1 � I 5 I • ! E . .*. .T. 2. A. u L. E. g. R. . . . . . . , 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I -_ 1 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 __ 1 • I___•I I I I I I I ' 1 I 1 I I I I I .1. I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 ---.. 3o• 7 • - i- - - • 1- N e w t. Y .�1 1 I I I II I I I I __ I I __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 3; 1-7----3_.(._‘ . D -- - ---------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I__ 1 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 " 5 1 •6----3 1.• o' - 1 . .? .E. a.`• y-E - • 6 ale - ---- ------------- I I I , 1 1 1 I 1 I __ I I __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I III 1 11 I I 1 I I .3.2. I. . .�.2.2. . d . . 1 1 1 1 II , I I 1 _- 1 I __. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 , I I __ , 1 __ I I I ' 11 1 I 1 I 1 11 ' 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 II I I I I __ I (® I __ I I 1 1 , I , , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 , I 1 1 1 . 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 __ I 1 _-. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 :._-3-3!7i • 3liLc• • Z- •Two. .�. t .Q . .S _ . ij ` .T.*. .,Z .G* i.: tt. S. . . . I I I I I I I I I __ I I __ I I I I I , I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I , , I I I _..._ • 31 T � ! 1• 31 S 10. I e._ 1 &! _=I I I 61 t I k 19 1 S I 1 +I I ( I 161 ,-I �, ' � I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 II I I I I __I 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . _ s 3. .®. . .3-s- ---t-) . - 1 ' I 1 I !_- ! I__ 1 ! ! ! ! ! I• 1 I• I I 1 I 1 1 1*I ! I I 1 I 1 I I I3S2 . .t • p4cB . D1 ® 6I5 t * t1c * E * I I 1 II I 1 1 1 --_ I 1 _- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 __ 1 1 __ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I. I I I I I .y €.o . . . 4. 1 .Z. . &-. .o. 6.! w 1 T bf .S..j .,i.,7 Cr.w - .?.. `. ® . P.(.,. 1- _----- 1 1 ' 1 II I 1 I 1__ 1 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 11 , I I I __ 1 ' 1 -_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 I 1__ I I __ I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 I II I I I 1 __ 1 1 __ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1t?tVitWWV- ti NAru.: START TIME OF REVIEW:REVIEW: —! 1 !1:0!®! iM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:—! ! 1, ! rO M ! FILM TITLE:G! ‘ !R!L! F!R.' !E! Nat, !S! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .! ! ! , ! • • ! ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= - 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE A_ MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E. T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE (TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I__ I I I I I 1 1 a 1 1 I __ 1 3 1 __ 1 1 1 a a I l 1 1 1 a 1 I 1 I 1 1 a I I I a 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •` zdI. t• L • ® • -- - I 1 1 1 if __ • co I __ I 1 1 1 I I ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1 —— 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . e . �. 2S ' .1.. 7. .7 • 0 . I I 1 1 1 ! 1 I I I __ I 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I __ 1 1 __ a a a a a a a a a a a a a I a a a a a a a I a a a a 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 __ _—. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .I . �.3 .2 . . 1 •1 •LI .7 . . .� . e.0 .1-.•12 . E. I .N. .�.� .o .� .H . ) . N.G. . S. .r O.R. r. . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _— 1 a __ a a a a a a a a a a a a a' a 1 a a a a a a 1 1 1 1 1 1 . , . Z.q .7' • IA •ce Sr . 0 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 __ 1 I __ 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 a a a - a I I a a a a __ a I __. 1 a a a a a a a a a a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • l •2•S•5• 1 ) ® • -- ® -- - - I 1 1 1 ! ! 1 I I 1 __ I I __ I' 1w! O I a• x I T a•A 1• �1 1 1• 1 0.N•a 1 c•I 1 a S a• 7!�! +1 c a I a 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —._ 1 1 —_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ -i• O.3. . 0 1 o - -- V- --- S I f T E IQ S - *- 6 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —_1 1 —— 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a a a 1 ! ! 1 1 1 ` .7. 1 a ,` a 1 0 a \ 1� I 1 --- • T 1 -- 1� 1( !T I !�! g 1 S 1 e 1 1?a g ,D a C 1 a ,9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — 1 __ 1 a a a a a a I a •a a a a a I a a a --z1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1 __ 1 I I I I a a a I I a I I I I a a a a a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! __ I a a a a a a a a I I I I I a a a a a a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ..... 1 1 __ I a a a a a a a a I I a a a a a a a 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 I _-. 1 I 1 a 1 I 1 1 1 a 1 1 a a a a a 1 a a 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 tt REV IEWER'_S NAME: � C. G✓ 670 e START TIME_OF REV IEW:-!,/'.D: a!7! !dM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! Apo 1,1 4 M !� .FILM TITLE:Zy I I r I "240I I I I I I I I I ! I ! I ! 'I . I• I I _ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= . 0 NO SPEC IFIED .ANATOMICAL AREAS . - ,. <OR "SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES : -.: ;1 - „SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS - J2 "HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE .. , ;3 , HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE . . ' .. 4 MASTURBATION . • 3 CUNNILINGUS • . • 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE • 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 6 L r/iV6 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 1.0 : RAPE/VIOLENCE -(TAPE COU 'TE ` 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE - START -:STOP / TYPE DESCRIPTION !" /p07! 1 /!0y !, .!--r O I__I I I I r . I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I /!0!/!f! I& !/ I !--r 6 !-_I /!o!,04/ ! ! i ! ! ! ! r ! ' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r I ' /! 1 !/ ! ! ! /!/9 1 / !b!__! 4/!__r r r 1 1 r r 1 r 1 1 1 r .r 1 I r 1 r 1 r r 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 t' I 1 1--' 0 �1 --Viet I I�I 1 , I' lit I I 1 � , , I le I II C,'f e, s s /!e �f - i o � �15!i wie f! ei!4,N ' C'!e;(/ / !/ !0 !t 1 /! r !0 ! ! !__r !__t I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 /I /7!/J!,! r /( �j ! ! �JI/ !--r6 !--, I I 1 1 1 I r, I 1 11 1 1 I 1I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1__1 1 __1 1 I 1 I I 1 .1 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /lo!V(/1 1 /1// 1t v 1--1 / - .e. ,1 / '/! ! (i[ ` ../z i. Il[ VI/I oI 1 1 1 , , ' r 1 !/o !t! !Iv !;b !--I 6 !__! e,vivf! 15 1 v1 14441 I . 1 I I 1 I• I I le ,, I I , 1 , , , t , I ,--1 � 1--1 , 1 , I !tie** , 1 1 I , 1 1 1 t , 1 , ! � 1 /1 ! O! ! /!a ! 5. ! t. !c.o// / . ! ! 4!/I!G! V sue. ! - ! I - I /0 !p!,9! 1 !,q10 ,__I I __I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I , I I I I I ! /0 !f ?! ! /!p!IV !__! e !__I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /e !f/ ! !iv! ! !__1 D!__ 1 I I I I I I I I I I _ .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /0 I/ 3 I I /10!¢1 A'--! &!--! ! .w j I eL 1‘! i !,0 I/(N/ 1//! ! 7!-O! 1 I ! 1 ! ! ! 1 / I </�VfJ !¢!8! ! 1!0!5!0!--12 !--1 6,!,//I rf /!elli! vIy1ee1/1`I, 1 I I 1 I I I I I r I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 ,_-1 1__1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /10!jt! ! /!, !5! .1__! D !__ I I so I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I (,. , 1 I I 1 , 1 1__i 1__ 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /10 15 5! /!D 15.g . ! .c,e !, 7 !i J! e !0! ii!ei W/'4 , /!O!olg ! !".,0 !"1!__I ,__I I .1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 •I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/!a!,// ! I //! /r!) !__! 61--1 I I II I . I I I I I. I I I I :1 I :I I I I $ 1 1 , , ! !?!a! !, !/ !0!1!_-! .0 !__I .,I I .I _I I I I I I I I I I I. -=I _-.'Y /1/ I I 'I I 1 1 I 1 , I I �� , , 1 1 1 1 1__, k--!6eywr„(1/ 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 I 1 1/.-/.p. . /. /. at..6. . e. 1 .2. ko V . .,(5 . ! ! ! . ! ! I/7 ,O I ! 1 /1 /1 01 0 1_._11__I I I I I .I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I yI D!O! ! /!/ !/ !O!__! 7!__ I I I I I I .I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! /!/(!/! ! !/!/! /!/!__I /(�{,!--I I I I S I I I I I I I I I I III II I 1 I I I 1 I I l l 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 _1 1-_1 !,0/0 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I I I I 1 I ! I 1 !,/ v 0 ! /!/! /! GI_-I 21-_I I . I I I I I •1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I V 1 1 I 1 1 1 -1?--1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I,/7 1 /1 ! /!/!/!�!--! too 1 1 I I 1 I IIIIIIIIII I III , I I 1 !/1/ 1/I6! !/!/ !&2!--1 p, !--I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I- I I I I I I I REVIEWER'S NAME: c, 1 ge,/....Areit.5 �i/�� . t .'START TIME OF REVIEW:-! /!/:¢e !.f M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! ! ! A ! M FILM .TITLE: , 1 ! ! , . . - ACTIVITY CATAGORIESa 0 :NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS . • .OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES . 1 • SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS _ `2 .HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE . : 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE -. • 4 MASTURBATION , • . 3 •CUNNILINGUS - 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE . B MORE THAN TWO .SEX PARTNERS 649e, 7//16 9' SADO MASOCHISM . . SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE (-TAPE CCU" ER i 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE � . . START STOP TYPE . DESCRIPTION yviiv! ! ly!,1 y !--! t_.-i els II 1 . e I II II III II IIIII III I 1z1/ !N! 1 /!/ .4r--! / ! --/L1;/�j- !`�. VV yV 6151 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I � � (� 1 1 �__� 1__1 1 � 7-!,. ! 1 � 1 1✓� 1 1 1 1 .� ! ! ! ! 1 1 . /!/ ,S.5! . 1./ 4. 7. ./o. . .Z !/ .�.,e./!5 ?rls !/!4/ !7�� ! ! /!/ !,!a! ! /v 15! 7l- ,!__ !i!5!d v!e vi 5! !I! 1Tfj ei !iew 1 1 ! 1 1 !/v !,1:7! ! /!,!,y !__! 2 ! .......1111111111111111111111111I 1 /1Z W1 1 / ! O!4 l--,G l--1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !MO!6! ! /'!Z!UV !--! 7!-_1 1 1 1 1 1 1IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIII /!2!p' 1! Z�!y!- �!--, / ! !s! vaet ! ,i! .0.014414/1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . /.V 15. . /.2./ .4 . w1 .5.5! !r/o !,t.4!.5 ./ .,4! !T! e ! ! ! . ! ! . . . !/ .1.,!/ ! ! /sei/ 17,__!7!__, IIIIIII I) IIIIIIIIIIIII • i I t /! 0/ 11! . !Z,Z !2!--, ! -- !s1, /!5!,9 !v!o!,(AA!5! ! zee,¢v , , , , , /!,!,!/,! ! , !p,,,!__! i! --!//„ 5 ! /le y;40-5 ! 1.pi {UI/ 17i i i i i , s . i ! Ii !j!J! ! i!z!f !--, 3 , --1 1li ' ''d! oV. ! I! ! ielti! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! , /t /!9! , ./!e!w ,--, ! --, I ' ' I I I I I I , I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I yl.!. Z ^ 1111el v!__ ! ! __ , ,5!5l. A j!e !iv l5! W -4/! ! ! !'U !dWfoekf 1 III -A- !/! !DI ! j!/!/!2 ,--, . , -- /!5I51 tJ!ewr l ,! !2! �/( yr ! i i /vpv . .i.2.� - !My!tx!6! 7.1-: _ . .ei! .gyp . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 11 , 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1 1 . 1 1 1 _1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 z I 1 I I II I I I 1_....1 I..._1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__! !........I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 I REVIEWER'S NAME:__ /�1_2 `�'/ ics //�� START TIME OF REVI-EW:—! !b !Q !TM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:—! ! 0!�! !till • F.I LM T I TLEr_! i ! '1 yA J 9 1e W!i! ! ! ! ! ! !. ! ! .1! ! ! ! I ! 1 1 i ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 .'NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL 'AREAS - •`OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES . - `1 :SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS . 2 HETERSEXUAL .INTERCOURSE . -3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 :MASTURBATION • 5 'CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO . 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE ,, /het f/M . 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS ifiv - 4' SADO MASOCHISM • SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE _ • START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 1f/!Doil 1 tit ,!i!--!.!--! , ! Sf/1 !. 1C/T/ V. ! I. 7?,! : W &/ ' I I I 1 a 1 l a 1 1 /1 O!�f_! 1 1 ?! !__1 v� I �_I 1 au l 1 . 1 1 1 I I / 1 1 1 a a a a 1 a a a a a a a a a I !p !j ! liv! 6!__! .n! __1 l/ ! / ill i! 1 !eit!5li l/t1 -1 -1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 i!D!h! ! ! ZID!9!__! ,6 !__1 a a a al a is I a a a a a a al a 1 1 1 a al a a 1 !PD!)! ! !1 /!a!--! i/ !--1 1 1 1 1 _1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I !.1 / ! /�! ! !�!, f�!—_! h ! __1 l 1 1 1 I 1 I vl 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1' !/ !i! ! 1w !f!--1 / ! __://0 ! if! !l! ! t!j,!0!, i/V� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1r .1 I ! !/ !)! 1 I�!/110!1 11f --1 . !-- I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 �1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 ! ! !!O! ! ! pp/ !--! j ! --a 11 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 I I- 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! ! ,-!' . )///�I! ! ! . e! q!_- 1 O�j!__1 1 la al al ail ail alai ail 1 I I i l I• 1 ! ! ! 9! ! !j! !t!--! !lii!--1 e1* ! /!e ! "Z�f/K !v! 1! !� 15 15 !Ion a 1 l I a I !ti�!/f! 1 1 �f!.�!�!__! 7i__I 1 1 1 1 1 Ir..l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! �] ! 6!�1 I I Z!/L! __I ._—1 1 l 1 1 1 1 l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 l_ I 1 I l i I •1 I 1 I y!y ! ,,!,,,,!A!__! /!__vw,. 7, 1714 1 1 1 71 ��1 a a a a a a a II a a a a ! 1 •� 4—! ! ! J ! ,!--! !--! /(! 11_ !5 !/!,e 1 ! 1!4!/ ! ! ,(JI J v ! ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! 1 ! 1 1 !m 1 1_! ! 1/J! ! 7!__! fl 1__1 I I 1 1 1 1 a l 1 1 mama . , lama1 1 !t!5 !- /! ! ! ! 0!0 !__! / !__ !Ni. I I�I/ 1 1 1 1 l 1_ 'I 1 1 a a a a a 1 a a a a a a a ! 1/210101 1 131/ 131__! 0!—_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! !, ! ! ! ! �! / !! !-_! 6 !__ 1/s14! !g!/ ..... IEl! !coat 1i ie a I II IIIIII 1 I !/ !ii! 1 1 9 2!/ !--! CC/.y�'7!--! , 1 5! 5 ! o! 41424,G!/ ,1V / j!% ( S! 1?! ! '•![ F� 1 1 !/ ! ! ! !/J ! !—_I7!—_ 1 _I 1 1 _1 ail1 alai 1 17—.I; ..i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 !.ni. 1 1 I v,0!--1 0 1--1 1 1 1 pie 1 1 1 1 el 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_-1 1_-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 ,__1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1- 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 IIIIIIIII 1__1 1_-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I, 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1_...1 t_-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 11 1 1 1 1_—t 1_-1 1 1 1• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I__1 1—_1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l I 1 1 .1 I 1 REVIEWER'S NAME: �� / /2 6' . . . START TIME OF REVIEW:-! !9:3! 7! !iM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-!/!/ : ' ! !4M FILM T I TLE a�!O !(�y try.i�� i l _ft ` '/ / i ' ' . . . . ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES . i SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS , 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE . . 3 . HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 3 CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE !/N 9 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9. SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCEZ-L/4-4-/ 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE Er �� START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION ! ' 1 ! ! ! !__ i__1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! !9!7rc7! ! ! 9!9!g!- 1 21 - 1 11 �4' i� / ' ' ' ' , ' ' , , , ! t ! 1 1__1 1 __1 1 1 1 1 11 I . . . I , .I I I , I I I I I I , I I , !9 ! !,,, , !)y !o !--! / ! __!,//:/!e ! G !e !ai y1, ,/'! ly , , mot 1 1 1. 1 1 , , , !9!A_!/] , , !91//1/ ,--! O!--, �, I , 1 , , 1 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 , ! ! 9 !d!/ ! ! !9!¢,� !_-! Z!.--!Nit-7 ! /5 ! fr ! ,117'fl! Tr! U��. !/ fJ! i/!lt ! ' ! ! ! ! ! Q!4!r/! ! ! Q ! el! !--! /i !--' , I , , , 1 , , ( ,l, , , , , , , , 1 , , , , , , , 1 yl., , 1 !9! !2 1__1 --1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 g, ! ! ! 91 ! --! !--'G' w, , /de, Il, I , , , , , , , , , , , , I , ,. , , 9„,,?, , /! h,O! '!__1 D I__1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 I $ 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ! /!O'lp! i ! /! o'o!3!-- ! Z !--'L/ V ! itA o! 1! ! 'I!21, ! ' ! ' ! ! ' ' ! ! ' , , , i/e, 10!'! ! pc ,0 i. i__ ! V 1-_ 1 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'l!p!p !! 1 /! o!/! a!— o !- 1 1 1 1 1 1 , !/!o!/ !a! 1/ !0 !/ !3!--! 3 !-- !t! !4!/ !,ei!5! ! /'/! l_��'/!A�!pls3! !6! /7 1 , , l /,O! /,...,l , ,, D,/ ,�,--1 a!--1 .. , 1 , , , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 , , , 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 , , , 419161/ . 1 fie !/! ! ! /!a ! /1.6!--15! --! !) -rielb! y 4!,leet It,!4! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! /1, v !1.! ! /!0! / ! 7!--! 61-- 1 , , , , 1 1 11 1 1 , , , , 11 , 1 1 , , 1 , , 1 1 ! /10 1 1 , , , 1/ !9!__! 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /!01/I! 11!0 !t!/ !--! 7!__1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 , , 1 ! , 1 1 1 1 , 1 1/!O!(/ / ! 1 /!D!Z!9 !--, O 1--1 , , 1 1 1 1 , 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 / .1 /fl ! /!D! !0 ,_-1O,__ 1iSt[ ,�,� , 1 f .,e,12/1 IIIIIIIIIIII ! t !po! 1 /!# ! !i!--! 8!__ viii �{/./"i !'/ ! 1 ! ! (v l ! !/ G151 . 1 I I I 1_ I I 1 1 1 ! /I� ! �j!�/ ! 1 /! 0! J!4 1--1 ,--,`, 1 1 1 1 1 1 , f 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1/!0, 1 , 1 , 1 1 1__1 ,__, ,1 1 1, 1 ! ! , , 1 !/! 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! , 1 !/!0!,!b! !, !e! !5 !__! ! !__!i!g !v!,e).1 ,0! !0! 15!,,iaa„,,t! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ,/! ,i!,..,! 1 /!01/J!Q !-_1 D ,__1 , I 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 PO 1 1 1 1 1 _, 1__1 , , , !1! , , , , , !AV 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /10 1L�JJ1/! 1 /!p !9! !_-1 Z'-- , , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 , , 1 t 1 , 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , ! /!!O! !. '! ! , ! , 1__! L ,__! 1 ! ! ! ! 1 el 1 •I 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ! /ID ! !/1 !/i/w ! /,!—_i ih ,__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ' 1 1 1 , 1 REVIEWER'S NAME: Si 5 ///el START TIME OF REVIEW:-! A : 1 ! M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! ! ! ! ! M FILM TITLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 16051 1 1 ! 1 ! - -,• .i44.1,py ' Y� i'G-y! ' / p ACTIVITY CA TABOR IESin 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL 'AREAS " .OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS " .'2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3. HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS .6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE 8 MORE THAN TWO . SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE (.TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START -`STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 >!/1 /! !/!/ !/ !�!--! �!_-1 1 t a t a 1 t , a a a a a 1 1 1 a t e a e 1 e a a a,! I 1/ 1 1 1 1 e/ 1 t -1 e_ 1 1 1 1 I 1 t I1/�� a ! y! ! !/! /� ! 0! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! �/ l � � /�/•! • •- / -.�� •c�� �'�/Cfl• SQL• L/ �[// 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,,,! !__.! 1__1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !0 !--! ; 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 . ivv 5! ! /!/ !I ! .�/rjr w! yf ,R/may►/ ! ! ! ,4/ 1110 ! !/!/!!/!, !-_! D !--1 1 e I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I e 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 IIIIIIIIII_-1 1 --1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 AO e 1 1 :'1 1 1 1__1 1__1 J 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 I e, 1 1 l e 1 1 1 1 II l' 1/V !9L.! 1 t/! /!/ 1--t6 1--1 1 1 on 1 1 e 1 1 ' minimum 1 1D/!/// q 1! ! ! /! !--! 2!--1 t I 1 I 1 e 1 e t e t 1 e e t e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/JI/ ! 1 12„!/ !A !-_! 0 !__I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 t 1 I/ !? ! ! ! z! fit 1-- ! / ! --e 1 1 1 ! !4! !/! !&1 i!,e fry I,! l f1!9j 4 1 c! `i I ! /fl 1 ! ! !1-!/ !/ !--! ,!-_!6!/I,a!G ! ! �1 /! f/D!�1 ! 1 e ! :! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! v ��. . (/ (/ X/ . /fir �• ,�(. 1 !4l !6! ! ! t v i!-- ! 2 ! -- !v /!,! 7!/i!L'! 1! 1d! I s�!) JI,/!1/2!c1, 1 a t a a a 1 a a t ! �1 .1!7 1 1 j) !�j !--1 �! __1/ 1/2!/ z1�1 &1/�,!/ ! /1_//1st 1 a in 1 1 1 t a 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 ! l /110 t I ! !�!1,!--! /f !--! !) !5 ! r vl !.f! ! /I4 // tl!o GI e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! ! 'V. !/J! ! ! Al2 !/ !-_! ! __1 /! / !kG �'�1/,{!y//st e III I 1 1 1 e t e 1 1 1 1 I t I ! ! I ! !! !--! et !--I l I 1 I I t 1 t I 1 1 I I I I 1 I e I I I I I I I I 1 ! /J! ! 61 ! ! ! !9!--! 5!--! !/ !//!1! &! !`/ lh )e! !,g1e!5!S !6 7 ! ! e ! ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! n/! ! !j! !/j !--! / !--e I I I I I 21111111111111MM I ! //! op! ! ! !I 1 1--1 6!__!4! / !� / ! ! 4 !Z! I//1 !/ /G. l,4!,e 1s 1�1 !CI I I I I t 1 1 �/! 0 ! !z!¢!6 !-_! 0!__e l I e _j I I I I a a a ail I' •1 . '1 1 a tie al s a 1 ! t!/.!/n! ! ! j! i!7 !__! `0!--!d!/ I ff!/ !G! ! 1/ !6' 7'7 IA/41 IIIIIIIIIIII !/ f!// /� ((zz)) ! L%L/-�(/ Y( Oda`//��=�J//�! v L���//� I ! ! /LI 7! ! !�J!5!�!--! S//!--!6! /!/o L!� !'! ! pie ref, ! � I 1 1 I 1" 1 1 1 1 I ! l t ! ! I t tAe__t6 I__I I .1 1 1 I I 1 IICI 1 1 1 1 e 1 en I glum ! 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 t__! / 1— 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! 1 ! 1 ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 I . .2.�.g. . !Z! !i . — giE! • •5-r/!/ -peel! ! ! ! ! ! . ! . -I I /f1 y',IQe l 1�1/(lnl--! /� !--1 I �(I I I m 1 I I I 1 1 I I,� I I e I e 1 1 1 I 1 1 t t Jl ! �t0!,6,! ! !pa 1 e--! 1!--! !, !/! I ! !el/ !//!�!e!D'J IY! e!5 ! /er I I I 1 l l 1 11 1 1 a 1__1 e_-1 1 1_ I 1 e 'I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 e I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 11 1 ! ! !—_1 1__1 1 e 1 1 I 1 I 1 l 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I - I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 III...—.1 e__1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I l . e 1 I I I I REVIEWER'S NAME::__ .P) 107 it/SI _ .START TIME OF REVIEW:-'' !01/' ! 'pm COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! ! : ! "! ! ,M FILM TITLE:pep/2 !/yp !,4..!zi ! ! ! ! ! ! -! ! . ! I -! ;! ! • ! I ! I -! ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 -NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS . OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 : SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS - 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 , "CUNNILINSUS - . ' 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE . B MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE (TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF -ABOVE START •• STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION ! , ,!/ 15! I j !! ! e! � ;1/!/&cc. vT !ram mot/,y, , !,)I) ! ! ! !j !1! !__! ! 1v ! !p'o vim/ !,/ !i!r'7! ! I ! ! I , ' ! ! , ! I , I/ !2! I ! 1! /)1 I !--' o!--iest t, phis t • I le IIIIII 5 IIIII Is , ,),n,/ ! I , ,/J !--! D!-_I I I I I I I $ I IIII el I III "1 S Ili I I , , 1 l 1g.151 , , Zln„/,--' 0 !-_I I I , .:I „ I I , , , , , I , I , I , I „ I , I I ! !bill! ! , �!�!/ !--! !--'�!/ p!4! 1! ,,, w! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I , I ! 3! I/ ! ! • I /ll1/ ! ! , !--, O0 • I_-!#!e! f !`il/�/! !!! ! t! _ 15! ! ! ! ' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !� ! ! ! ! !--' 0 '--'G '/m/ly ! ! 1 I/ w ! ! I ' ! I ' ! _! ' I I ! ! , 3!v,! , ! )!,- t!-- ! -7!--w!�vi w ! !Z! ! !U ! '! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I I Iv ,, , , I-- ' O '-_I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , ,!4!/! I I , /J,,/ !-_ I ) !--! !E! ! v!� ! w_ ! ! ! I.!/! / 4" I I I I I I I I I I ! ! �7!,i! I I I I I__ I D I__ I I II II II I I I. IIII I III I I I I I I Is ! ! !,pj! ! ! ,! !--! /_!--I/!/;/l, J/ !, ! !1! 1 �!k! ! y!o !//!//1 /! I I ! I I ! I I I I , , 1 lol , ,,II/./ I-_I OI_-I_ I I I I " I I I I I 1 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , 1 1 1 I t , 1 , ,__� 1__1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! 1 1 1 ! ! !9!s! ! !y�!,p ! .t./�.� ! !p !I! !/v7 ' 24!p/ !57l ! ! I I I I ! , 1 , !_-1 I_- 1 1 I I 1 1 ! I. 1 ,g! 7 I ! ! ! ! I I ! I ! I I ! ! I ! ! , I , ,-_I DI__I I I I I , I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , ! I !7!15 !. , Y !--, 2 ! -- G �' '/' � 'i' 1I pg. ,�I/f I /fll�I/�, / I I I I I I I I ,.. , , , I //, , , , I ,__! 0 ,_-I I I I I I I I I II ells I mom I , I I I I I I I , !3! !,! ! !4!e !0!__! 2!--I/Y -(/ 05 ! 1-,! ! f!'! ! �/!8 ' )4 /, I I I I , I I I I , ! ! a !D! ! ! !0! / !--! p !_-I. I I I I I IyI _ I I I I I I I I I :I I .I I I I I I I I KL �Sj" ! I AI I I I , I ,--! I I , I I I I I I I , I , , , , I , I I I I , ' I , I ! ! 9! ! ! ! 4 /!0!--I / I--'L!/ !Ivv',9v I/y! I , I , I I , , , ' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! , 1 1 ! ! ! pig/I, !--I �i I--'1�/! !g!5.! ! ! Q� ! !'! ! I! !u!,(!4! ! ! ! ! ! ! I , ! ! �.�.�. . /fir (/ v (�/ . l'7. ` (/ v �V• ! I.4! /!l! , I / / I !__I O!--I $ I I to I I I , I I Is I tee I I I I , II I , ,' I41! /!A! ! I1! /!!!--!k, !--! !/!, D!4! 1! ! !• ! i! I I I , ,. I I I I , , , I , , , , I , I I I__, I__, I I I I I I -I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I__I !__I I , I , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I__! I__, 1 , I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I n REVIEWER 'S NAME: ///0 • 1i START TIME OF REVIEW:-! !B:/ !'! !,(M COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! `IQ: !t,..! 'A M FILM TITLE,6101/1 1 1 171414.1ie I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 , , 1 1 I I I 1 ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES • 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE • 4 MASTURBATION S CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE a/,� 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS • - e !q/�6 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION ! , y1/ ! ! ! ! 9!to!---! O !_-1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1q1.!/7! 1 11!/)!/ !-_ I4.!-_!rj! I '1 /1 / 151A1 1 1 , 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 9 !"/ !1 1 1 11//!VV/J V! �! __ 1 5 !__ 1 I I IL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Q!/f ! 1 1 91 4!--! g !--1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 ! I !__ , 1 __ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 9 !/n l 1 1 9 ! !7!__ I, 1 __,#6. $, I6,�1/ 1�I/ ,I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I , I ! _1:.. I I ! 1 I IDI__ I I __ I I 1 I I� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 q.� . ���111III. . �qqq.l a l/////�QQQQ . ^^ / ! 13 !}�!(5! 1 1 9' �! -_ I�! -- 1 15 1 /!`! !1 ,///I 1e! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I91 1 11 19$ 1 1 - In! - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --, I I I I , ! ! Q !� ! 7! ! ! n!e:6, -- ! z ! -- ! L !'1 !'\ tIg !C4. !s!/ V ! ! 1 ! 1 1 ! ! ! 1 ! y 1 1 I 1 II 1 1 I 1__ 101 __ , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ! ! 1I !9!/ ! ! ! q!5!. !_- ! ©! -_ I /e� ! yy ! / ,e,r, 1/I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I ! 1 C'�!f',! !/!O!a!/ ! -- I ! -- 1/I I/ ,i II, I6I I� 121 1 1 /Ir1 `/ !I/! !I// r L lc / �/ 1 I ! /!,!✓✓0!,/! , /!®!o ! 3!__1 D! _- I �I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 I I I 1 ,1 1 1 1[�,11 1 1 1 1 1 1 !/D o 7 ! 1! 1.0 ¢! -- , 2 1 -_ 21 /� L! 1 ! 1 ! I !✓l`! / !6! I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I. /!p! f4. 1 , p!p !s! -- I 5 , __ I I'l 1�l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I /!D , D!, 1 /! o!O! 0! -- 1 ! __ I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 0I 5I ! 40!o!9t 1__ 16 I __ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /10 !O0! ! /!0/ ! j --! / ! -- ! ..t.1_t/ !$ !/ , ! y! ! ! 4 /! ! ! ! ! ! , ! 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! , , , , 1 1 1 1__ , 1 __ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 _/'0. /.2 . �.Q.finn .�. _ �/�l�� I/0 !/ !�! ! /!O!/ 1__1 01__ I II I I . L I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , , I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /10!z! ! 1 j!O!i!7!__ 1 t! __ 1� /I „z1./1�/1 rl t 11 1 I 1 1 I I 1 , - , 1 I I 1 1 1 ,!a ,7 !7! , �!o !2! f!__ I D!__ I I I I I I Ij'II I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 1 /!D!Z9! 1 /!Q! /!-- 1 !/ !__- !' L °/ /4!4! ! ! I 1 55 !/!V ! G ,d e! 1 „ 15! I , 1/, ! l/ ! ! /!.! !� Q!__ ! f7!_-I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1' I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1__I 1__ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-_ 1 1__ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-_1 1 __1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-_ 1 1_-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_-I 1__1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 REVIEWER'S NAME: 2, .eagsa. / ' START TIME OF REVIEW:-! ! : ! ! !AM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME: -! ! : 11 FILM TITLE6!,/j9 !O 1 ! 1 ! ! ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES • , ..1 . SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS • 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE • • 4 MASTURBATION • 3 CUNNILINGUS • '6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE 9 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS Lo ipti 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE -E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE . . . • T COUNTCR4-- 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE • . START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION I. MA) 1 1--169 !--I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I !o ! / „ /!a !y!.!__ ! __ ,fG! !W!,1.k1C .9 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ov !-„ ! Ito!5i!/ !-- -- !(4 " I I 11711 I/!1 151 ery 11 I I I I I I I I I !` '0 !916! ' /!/ !0!2)-- ! a!-- 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I !/V ! !�! 1 f!�!a!3!--! / !--!G!Ye!) !/ ! ! !it ,3..!! !$ !D!/ ! 4,!, ! s! I I I , I , , 1 ! / ! / !O! ! ! /!/ !Q!(! __! g! --1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ' ' ' 1 ! ! ! ! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' !LA/wit ! /1 / !/ ! 3!-- ! i !-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 11 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /! /!/ ! ! J!/ !/!l! -- 1 •/ ! __ ! 1 ! !„! ! !0 I4 $! 1 m 1 1 r, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /!/ ! !p! 1/!/ ! t!t! _- 1 � !-- 1 ! 1'L!• i .- p1 !I! 1✓ of X)'C'Y1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I /! / !tt, ! -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 !vf re ! i y ! !-- ! -- wit"! ' ! !o!s, ;1! it! !,jc! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I /!,!2 �Io! I ,! ! !. ,! -_ ! O _._! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! /12 yJl ! /!/ 1,!6 ! 1 ' _ 1t! 101 !?& CIE 1 ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 ! ! 1 ! 1 1 !/!/ ! /! ! //!et ! __ 1 /„ 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! J!/ 11.110 ' / /' ,JJ1! -- 1 J!/! �! l /!�7.0 ! __ 1 !__ !B/ eehf !y! �, ) ! !!y !/ '�l! /� ! ! 1 ! 1 ! ! L G1Y ( ( L(�� � (� v (f I /!/ 15!0! ! /I tro! --1 4 J ! •1„!e!4 !,4! ! ! 1 !, 1//!/ !. 1 1 1 ow ! I ! /!ta!4 ! l !/-- !--1 1//(y/j!/ !! ! (L!�({ G ![ /'- !V 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 11.-1 • !t -- 1 !-- i V ! ! ! I I/,�!y1 1� ' /! f�+�l � ! ! ! !/ 1 vIt ! 11/ 1/J ! /9 I_- 1 p!__ I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I . 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I / 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__I 1__ I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I 1 I I ' I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1__1 !........ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I __1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I__ 1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REVIEWER'S NAME: (f l'J/ START TIME OF REVIEW:-! !]:l!/ ! p1 COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! t!¢! 9t1 • FILM TITLE: 1 1Alt-5,.!Z„),44-31 1 . 1 ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! . 1. ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES • 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS • 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 . HOMOSEXUAL "INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION • -. S -GUNNILINGUS " 6 FELLATIO •. 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE - C��,�L�,�, �1�,�� 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS �lfJ !e- -9 SADOMASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 . RAPE/VIOLENCE . , . -(-TAPE COUNTER-)- - 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION • 1 ! /1/ ! ! ! ! /! /!.,!--!/ !__! ! (�!/(/ ! 1,1 N !t c! J 'ie1/A 1/ I I i I ! !i1/ ! ! i ! /!/ !g!__!0 1-_1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1_ I 1 I 5 I 1 t/ / 29 h▪ . 1 .��.5. .! ! ! ,1 ! !/ !/! .�. .Q, ! ! ! ! • ! !,!2). 9! ! !__ ,▪ O !__1 It I 1 et 1 t Is I I I I 1 II I II I 1 I It I ! !/!�!t! ! ! j! ..t!--! 4!--,,bl !e!,!/!e! 11 • vzle .s,v, i ftz,!j! , , 1 ! 1 1/1p!i1 1 1 /1 1 6!--! 1 !-- 1 41./ l.Z 1!5 ! '/ .. ! // ! 'le o W .1 ! I ! 1 1 1 1 �1 1 1 1 1-- 1 1__ 1 1 (I I ,I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I et 1 I I I I I I I 1 ! !/!y I„ ! !/ !f!v! __ ! l!_ o !4/ V e7 ! 1 L '! w/v.ze:5!-t !, ,1 12!(J e• I I I I I p I I I I ! ! ten)! ! ! /121, !II:--- I. g,, ___eiaeefe„p-4 1 ! 1 1 1 1 , 1-- 1 (J1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! / !71 1 1 I ! /! !-- !L,F, ! --!/! .4_ i tet!S! ! , ' //ie !�);�! / Ifs !,! ! , ! ! .! I . .1 „,..,,. . . .,.,. _ . ,. __ . . . . I . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ! /IG 1,1 ! #O!/ --! /n ! -- }9 !�/.x1- !. 1 !,!/ I A,/ c it 1/ le lieleg1v1 I I I I I ! ,2071 ! 1to!Z!-- 1a. __ ! !a! z ! Z!0! !--- ! ! -- !op? !,1 f4! 15 ! ! j ! ! y ?!, !,D!G!e ! ! ! ! ,2„..d ! , 1v0! 7! -- ,0! __ I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 ! ! !e !7 , , ,0 !q8!--! !-- ! !k! ' ! r-if ! 'L/ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! , , , 1 !ZID1 , , ! ,! / !/ 1--! 2 !-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !/f!/1 / ! ! ! j1 / !`. !--!g !-- (/ C 15 ! ! [ ,4VL ' G / % ! ! �� e5!yfe { I I I I " ! !2/!5! ! ! Dit !6!--! �!-- ! ��/ ! ! !ii , w ! 1 1 1 1 1ZI /! 1 , ! A 1 i 9 !__, !__I I I I I - I I S I I , , I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I 1__ 1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /-1 . 1 ,�1 1 1 1 1 1 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �: . . ;J . ----_ - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1--I - 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 !.......I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 !..... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . ■ __ 1 1__ , I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I. I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I -#. . REVIEWER'S NAME: � / ,. START TIME OF REVIEW:-! !2,: !7!...!pM COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! ! 1 li rivl FILM TITLE= 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 •NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS ,OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES i - 1 SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 - HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE '3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 - CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO - 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS _ • C#f •f��t 9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. . .10 RAPE/VIOLENCE • (TAPE COUNTER-?— 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE . • START STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION - _ ! ! ! ! ! ! Z !t!9 !--! h!__1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 ! ! ?..) 11! ! ! pi Ifl !__! __IV! 1 1 1 1/ 7. ..! / ! e1l/ hi ! ! I I ! ! 1 : : : 1 �f11 1__1 11--I a1i /'Iyl 11 I T'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 pp !__1 0__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - ! ! ' I' ! ! ! pet!I !-- ! !--!g!€!5! !`j!✓V -1 7! ! ! 1j! ! ! ! /lyl' I I I 1 1 A,! 1S! !9 /�II! 1 1 1__1 / l__1 1 1 1 1`/1 1 1 1 1 1y1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 ! Glei! 1 1n ! �+!n 1__! e,!-- ! R!I[.{.+-7/!//!. L " _J! 1 / 11! ' ! v !.,V 1 be 1 1 l 1 1 1 ,.0,,, f! 1 -1,(C/� !G !�!__ lD !-- 11�LJI,JI/`�IV, I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 •.! !Z L` iy! ! ! ! --! -- ! I 1.. `/j! /1 ! l iyy! 1.•�.1/i�1/,/!/!t) ! I I I ! !. 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 !0 1__ 1 O!_- 1 I I I I I I I I.// I• I I,,(1/.I !4!I ,II IU II I i I I I I I 1 ! !6!0!0! 1 ! 'Ij !I 1__ ! / !-- ! J !/f!,()! `.10 !E ! ! 1.!/ !! / !r44 'e b ! 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! !j!O ! 1 ' 1 ! 3'O '5'__1 /1 __I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I II IIIIIIIIIII ! 1310 151 1 1 !O !h.,__ , 7! __ I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 11 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ! 1601 61 1 1310 1so 1 ---! 2 I-- !' LD!' 1 ' ! 1 /1'd1 '6!D !'V ' 'L '' `� !s! 1• 1 1 ! ! Q 16 !19 ! 1 ! 2! / 1,!__! p !_- 1 1 1 I 1 1 I , 1�1•/ olio 1. I -I 1 1 1 - I 1 I I. I 1 11 ! / 1 ! ! ! !/ !4!__ !J !__ ! !/ 15!r!ej I 1 4!1! n! / !�e/ lei/-1 1 1 I 1 l I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . ,!/ .¢. . ! !I . g. .615 �a / !al ! . .G.1 ;e.G• , / ! i. I ! b! ph! ! ! 2!/J! I! __! 0 !__ I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I. I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 3.1VI/ ! ! ! ' 9 --! Z!-- IV Y !, 06- ! 15!/ 15!rl1//! ! ! ! .! ! ! ! ! ! ! I I I ! ! I 1 1 1 1__1 !__1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1Its&,1 1 ! yv7!__1 / !__ 1/_1/ Wiii. 1�1 Wifi�/i I I 1 I t I I I I I I I I I l 1 1 I 1/fl 1 1 1/�s//CCii1// 1__I •/Vn l__ 1(�, 1/V I 1 I/7l/"'1/VI I 1 1 1 1 1 ,e „,_,,y, , , , , 0_,_:, I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 0 1__1 I I 1 11 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I•`• 1 I I 1 I I ! !4..! ! 1 � / !__! 1 _ 1 / y y e 3l I . 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I ! I l _2!�l-- 1p !__I l I l 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 l l I 1 1 l 1 l 1 l I 1 1 ! ! nl 19, ! 1 ! 16 !--1 % ! -_ ! A!& y.e... ! ! ! / / ,V1,21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I�1i.1 1__1 D 1__1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I1 5!A!2! ! !4!0!D !__! D !__! r!,e16 y! ! 7 ! I ! ! !V)7!4. ! ! ! l ! ! ! ! I l 1 1 J 1 /I 1 0l 1 1�l j'15!--1 lC/'7 1__' I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I . 1 I l IIIIIIIII I ! /(/ 1!"7! I ! 4! r!D !--16!--I p! Ayf l !i, 1//y/ 1./,6 1 9 9,,p.„I I I 1 I I 1 1 I l I 1 REVIEWER'S NAME: k J�� 00 �c11 C START TIME OF REVIEW:-! l�: !1! ! �M `COMPLETE REVIEW TIME:-! ! 7! rM FILM TITLE: 0!0! ! /:/ ! !(*) ! ! �i 'f ! 1 ! ! ! 1 .! ! I 1 ! ! ! I ACTIVITY CATAGORIES= 0 NO SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS OR SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES 1 . SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS 2 HETERSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 3 HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 MASTURBATION 5 CUNNILINGUS 6 FELLATIO 7 ANAL INTERCOURSE 8 MORE THAN TWO SEX PARTNERS lie f// .9 SADO MASOCHISM SCENE E.T. 10 RAPE/VIOLENCE , . --(TAPE COUNTER) 11 COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE START ��I1 STOP TYPE DESCRIPTION /! 2! ! ! ! / !?!__! �)-44_1�/_1�1 /tfjt _1 1 I�1� ��! 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 ! !711 ! /1:! / !1-! __! O !__ I I I I I I I I lifeI III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ! /LI 1// ! I !t! ! ! __I L I__! I ! 1 1 I !rtgeoki 1 1 I ! lisle it !__I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! 1 ! 1 I I 1 I__ ! 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 !__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I __! 1 __ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 ! .... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I __ ! I __ 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ! 1 1 1 I I I I __ ! 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 __ 1 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I __ ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ I !...._ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I I I 1 1 1 I I I I __ ! 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 1 1 I I I __ ! I __ 1 I I I I I .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__! ! ....._ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 I I I I __ ! 1 __1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! 1__! !_...... I I I I _ I, 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 1 1__ ! 1__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 __ 1 !___. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__ 1 !__ 1 I I I I I 1 I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__ 1 1__1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I •1 1 1 I I I__ ! !__ 1 1 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 .1. I 1__ 1 ! __I I I I I I I I 1 ! I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ! I I I I I I I __! !_.....I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1__1 1__1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I _ 1-- I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I y� Flavor r a Ah, -, ''c!'''''a.' of China ; = Y° Wilderness ,,, ' ` Sichuan cooks , ,,>•. ; , " : Lake is a treat ' \ like it hot t4 'f , but it is dying and striking; Cl r Y " -' ` an early death; D1 0 I . 0Copyrty8;1015 day, October 2, 1985 Serving Renton and Tukwila, Washington 250 . is ., „ ,:: ' "' ' 'f''' ' li •-:- " ',-,/`, . I , c 0 u r se s. ., , .4.,i.o,:e...„,, . i, vi , ,,, ,. -ri, 4 £•. i y'f +« gym. i,, i '� �M''s ": n" tt q � Pro Nov. 12 date- , , ," ' * .„, ,,,, � J .,A 1S r porn ca o , ,,,,,,,,,, -. , groups have filed on behalf of Play- : I ',. 4- ,•"" -. By TONY DAVIS time Theaters, which owns the X- i1" is 44 ,-- Staff Reporter, rated Renton Theater. case could well set a national w r , f " The U.S.Su' ,rz with bureau preme Court will hear pre orts The dent for the ability of cities to ` , , • ;;;';, ` oral arguments Nov.12 on the city of set aside land for adult movie ' .' Renton's case against,the X-rated houses. The'city is appealing a late kS.'''': - �; a a '` Playtime Theaters,Renton City At- 1984 ruling by the Court of Appeals r'. 0 ., ' ' torney Larry Warren said Tuesday. that struck down the city's ordi- Q, • Warren said the case is drawing nance restricting where.adult thea- , % �` �, 1 attention nationwide among local ters can set up shop. xi ,, z ' ; - governments and free speech. Groups filing either separate or ., ,n r 3, groups. joint briefs on the city's behalf a::': r y The Supreme Court will review a include the National Conference of , Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals deci- Mayors and the National 'Confer- ,,, �` "' • sion issued last November that held ence of State Legislators, the Na- • cx , , ' ,t< - Renton's zoning ordinance regulat- tional Institute 'of Municipal Law' i ing the location of adult theaters was Officers, the American Planning ' a .. constitutionally defective. Institute and the governments of' A lower U.S.District,Court ruling Cook County, Ill., which contains is being cut Staff photos by JIM BATES ' had upheld the ordinance. Chicago, and Jackson County,Md., Playtime Theaters President Rog- which contains Kansas City. er Forbes had offered to settle the On the other side, friend-of-the- . case by shutting down his theater if court briefs have come from` the the city would pay his legal bills of American Civil Liberties Union,the $250,000, but in January the city National Outdoor Advertising As- i •'.;' ', k ,4• ' decided to appeal the Court of sociation and a joint brief from the -, :,,• :: , Appeals ruling to the nation's high- Freedom to Read Association and ` est court.r the National Booksellers Associa Warren said Renton will file one tion,among other groups. �, ,} ,, last brief with the court before the Warren listed three possible - ' { �y end of the month in preparation for reasons for the case drawing so the hearin much national attention. First, he ' 4y ` If a Supreme Court case were a said, every municipality wants an _ ,� �s,� . "' numbers game of briefs, Renton ordinance of that kind it can rely on, '` R ` 1 ,, ` 4. t3,' would will hands down in its upcont- and no adult theater wants regu a- s, , Wn: 'a >;4 ing` fight against Forbes and tion, `t4 ' f t, p Second, he said, it' is a First ' �1 :�' t ,. �' company. Warren said Tuesday that 10 na- Amendment issue.Third,he said,it ,' r x.. tional organizations, government concerns sex— and sex sells. F t a`� ' 3 - *2i, agencies and other groups have "It's been highlighted in planning ' � '; "� :" x filed friend-of-the-court briefs sup- journals and municipal law period- +t>, ,1; , ,' ,,,,; 0 4 porting the city's efforts to use icals," he said. "I've gotten calls • ,' ,. zoning to regulate the location of from a newspaper in Washington, , adult theaters. Three national See MOVIE,page A3 .f. k.- " adult 1 , yy .� 1! :'a Tukwilafirefighter joins her:!, • „ -'1 ' ,. y , �.., •. Mexico quake-relief team A 21-member emergency medical "To be perfectly honest,I haven't r team, which includes a member of been briefed in what I'm going to be lx'' �t o ' the Tukwila Fire Department, de- doing," he said. "It will depend on a,< 4< , "5*:`•* ` ( parts Seattle todayto Spend a week what we see when we get down ,' ' helping in earthquake-shattered there." ''-� f ' Mexico City. Grisham, s volunteer efforts be- ,.r., 3 _ Marty Grisham, a Federal Way gan last Saturday when he led Tu.k- •_ - .116th Ave. N.E.,Bellevue,will pre- mg lleveiopn+cu� +_.._.,__ „G,,,b _�__ v. �„ : sent a workshop titled "The Fears, to city, senior center 441-s767.or the Sma1l.Business De- newly annexed territory:until ,the One developer,ntl• r>t- bana toys and Survival of Retirement" Fred presented a 19,American velopment Center at 464-5450. start of.the;next calendar,year. Seattle,• recently,opened a •new late 1970s, when economic factors from are to a p.m. Legion, presented a flagpole and Tukwila:won't, begin coil ating •:72,000.square-foot:warehouse;and „encouraged development a nd"corn;today rowtti, Led b Y Karen Kent, therapist in flag to:Renton Mayor Barbara Shin- , , taxes from .Crestview until :nest..: now is building a,12,200 square-feet .panies were r looking to t: he south y year, • Morrison Crestview office complex next,door at:1101•'.portions of_the county as : .a g - ' the :Older.-Adults Department- of. 'pech at.the Renton Senior. Ski Conditioning CIaSSAndover d offiat 110- area." who said new-( ionstruc� '•shop de Menial information Health, the work- Center last month. The:•flag.was Ando ll open•in-December., Morrison, . . presented by the'post's-American- wilt prepare y0ll ' l slopes I°`" shop will offer on the ism chairman,Ted Taylor. • hest it's been , often ignored psychological issues A • ski conditioning• •class•willan•bed • _ •"merckall industrialla and its o.area have have a in at leas th ear Mast f the ive yea rs,said a • • of retirement planning. Dave Tomkinson and fellow offered by the Rent Parks •Fee is. 15 and pre-registration is LegioHoskies Mario Tonda and Wood- Recreation Department on .Thurs- TuiC . •I . budg1:%I strong attraction for companies task-,officforcials=of sr studying •ways to required.For more information and days, this week through Nov. 21 such as Tri-Land, said.Frank Agos Y • row• Hoskins made the arrange- 1 such of Macaulay Nichols Maitland.. keep things humming. ' •re altrationcation-• Department at ments for the purchase and presen- from 7:30 to 9 p.m:_at Rent Junior g` Health Education Department •at tatwere. A plaque and history box High'School.Cost of the class is$15 growing aloe • International,leasing agent for the The Urban tied byTukwila May `or Gary 455-9156. were donated et Don Holm of and pre-registration is required'.For new office building being•built.by Force, (he's.also a me rber),is Greenwood Cemetery..The history more • information call Kent Parks p 1 T-"The e: :: r . with o ulatio nd C .• = "There is major office space, a "looking at how we got here and how ' • :'Federal agency plans ` . box is embedded in the flagpole and Recreation at 872-3350. • ' •-•A•bigger popularion.mean:��a.big- base. fully-developed industrial base,and to keep .it•going. It's,a m. darke. The fla ole is dedicated to vete- ger budget for the'city of Tukwila'.•.-• '. all the retail support that's needed to .approach to orderly':develc 1pment," surplus goods •auction gpI : ' Morrison said.- e in_ cans of all wars and-especially to Human Rights Conference .-, next •year. = enhance it," Agostino said: Zye;task force, :which includes Surplus government property, l those died, as well as prisoners of at onlyers Saturday .= city Administrator Don Morrison He added thatTukwila's building , :'eluding office.-furniture, -medica war and those missing in action. ".7 said a,preliminary '1986 t�udget :pelt and:zonirig processes are no representatives of majors orpo items,appliances and.tools,will be Amnesty+International will hold a scheduled to be presented by 1_Viayor. •easier or,harder•to (Val with'than landowners•in Tukwila and,.'I the', �F + . • ' wila/Sea-Tee- Chamber` c`• if'C,_;__• •sold ate public auction Oct:9 at the Gary Van Dusen to the City(-punch. those'of other cities i' • •. ng with,a d �nsultant from- 9:3U a.m.;•:to .5. p.m. at the Oct. et will be'higher•than 11985.s But,Collins said, we did'stream- •coerce, I.:federal General Services Administ- In Der hel r to rove for _ Human Rights Conference Satur aY line our.permit process to make it as and will issue a,report nex t,year. ','ration complex .•in southwest •offer helpt0 inVentorS.., University of WashingtonHUB.The. budget of$5.9 million.,. . . .• . • j: • Auburn. Innovator Workshops •conference•is free.For.more infor- ' "But our population has ice: eased .-.:• ,• • The items include_office equip=. . A •se sponf 22 percent,'.'adding to the amount of •: Dent•such-as-electric'typewriters,:.,will be sponsored.by the Inventor's .mation_call 282-0026. services the city expects to I� ovide Explorers Offer to test' seniors'..smoke•detector. S next year,Morrison•said., .-. Tukwila •Fire Explorers Post 51, the fire department or't he'city's - - � - ■ _.'°.+•.:��- •``• ' '• - . • . ,. • � .`. . •• •..``. - : Through annexations;;•Tul�sw>la s ._through the Tukwila Fire-I?epart :community, center to scliE• ;dole'ap- -- : .; 860 a:n 1984P �` population went from 3, went,is offering free es testsof senior all sec orsSlivingpn Tukwiram� ••la free to ;. O�1 v .T� ! :. ., ^. . detectors in the hom + ar ' in against • the Renton ordi- to approximately 4,600 this yf ar• A fire department spokes man said . . ..• - •page-At-=ro -. J ck"' urns, representing.Play gu, g have contended:- and the Next year's.proposed budget will. citizens. .mans it's . Continued from about it and gotten callsv from' time,said it go no feeling for how .cance - L1'D.C. avid Utevhow city has denied• ;tded:-he city was be available for public'r s r�V aced. ershe and young•adugts in ere ted of n called,the was prompted Programy h �ouse:fire. municipal attorneys all over.the'_ the cvae swill go.But D to the preliminary version p p • • - a private Seattle lawyer who is doing Settyn .aside an adult area that lased' fields, will, annual the when it.caught fire:was . U.S. for the ACLU on this by The council will vote on final f figures ;careers in fire protection and re- in Tukwila Aug.4.A man sl eeping in : � tiH said, the thec casey has because'.the the' volunteerse,said work • tests and install a new,ba conduct inual th house after Der a neighbor • heard a ,o S •Sup in becausen ly .that said he twill rule g the. was not economically viable: ' later thisryear. • pthat the court•will againstUtevsky also noted that while the _ .smoke detectors of seniors who call smoke•alarm from .the he' ruse U.S. •Supreme'Court has recentlycourt has acquired a'conservative • been reversing the Ninth Circuit city. Although the Supreme.Court. ;, : :, ' , _ - Court of Appeals in a number of ruled in'1976.that Detroit had the reputation in recent yeas,it has not _ cases;including one that resulted in right to set aside an area for adult gotten considerably more conserve- -I ; ' the upholding of Washington State's theaters and other specific kinds of tive since'1976. Only one new jus- -.- lii -- hair• ` • �_„� • _ . Renton's ordinance is tics, .Sandra Day,.O'Connor, has the b '� �. - ;moral nuisance law.That law,which businesses, , joined the.court;he noted. �_ the circuit •court had that out, `more extreme,he said. said, � �0��� �� - _'E \ . ''regulates materials that conforms The Detroit law,- ."You never know till it's over;'he ®u s B to the Supreme Court's standards still allowed adult theaters to flour- , .ice . -d fish in`a particular area. But those said: ;, . . for obscenity. FREE IAIRCUT NON SURGICAL APPROACH f - ,r_- MEDICAL COOPERATIVE with Every • . . . •. For Spine • Disc • Whiplash Spinal problems • 00-•. _ . ' . FOR PREVENTION OF SPINAL SURGERY ,` . .. , 1 - Untreated after-effects can be disabling. . 00... ''� a 50 r Danger Signals r� pERm. )- • �oR g-S DAY,EVENING, •Headaches • •Neck,Shoulder•Arms Pain • 1 /" ., • •Nervousness •Numbness in Hands&Arms �.30'1 1 e. ,. • OR SATURDAV •Painful Joints •Pain Between Shoulders • 7 APPOINTMENTS •Loss od Sleep • •Low Back or Lep Pain #111:\ j: x 7 -- liiitirk . Men and Women Welcome *— �, RR,.,,_T►,,,*o (Lk,Fri.&Sat.9-6 ,______ _ __ _ ____________, . .• Council told to keep ' ' ' . fighting X=rated theaters , . Forbes,owner of a string of adult movie By JAN HINMAN By Reporter N , ' theaters in the Northwest. , . • StaCity Attorney Larry Warren gave a Citizens for a Quality Community brief public review to the council of last urged the Renton City-Council Monday week's ruling by U.S. District Court . to continue the battle against Roger Judge Walter McGovern. The prelimi= Forbes and the adult movie fare he now nary injunction, he told,the council,' is showing in a downtown Renton prevents the city from enforcing.its • theater. ' ordinance,'.which had prohibited Kathy Keolker,who heads,the citizen Forbes from showing the X-rated group,said her phone"has been ringing movies at The Renton Theater. constantly"since the decision late last Warren also explained to the council G week by a federal judge.that allowed that the judge remanded the city's Forbes to begin showing'the X-rated request for'a declaratory judgment ! • films. The phone calls; Ms. 'Keolker, back to state court' for action. But 'said, have been' supportive of her Warren said no date has been set for group's efforts to keep the.movies out hearings in either federal or state of The Renton Theater."Let's fight it". court. ' has been the message conveyed to her Warren later closeted with the coun- by callers; '. cil in executive session to explain in ' • "We want our tax dollars spent that more 'detail the ramifications of the '3' way," Ms. Keolker told the council, judge's decision. He said he would be , ' taking note of the cost to the city to fight (Continued on page A2)' . giii%ly'/re eepr-e4-04/e/e, /-//-13 . • I Council . .. i . •(Continued from page Al) making some suggestions to• the council about the city's next move and'added,"I-will be seeking direc- tion from the council." • Warren said he did not expect the 1 council•to make any decisions on the . [ issue in executive session and would make no public announcinent at the close of executive session. While the council-weighs its next move and considers costs to the city, Ms. Keolker and other members of Citizens for a' Quality Community 1 said they would continue picketing , the theater. "We'll be there noon to ' midnight,seven days a week,at least , for the next week." The,pickets, she'said, have had a' deterrent effect On business,which she described as very light.She said she was ,somewhat dismayed to notice children as,young,as 13 or 14 years old, being .allowed;:into the theater. ' CQC plans-a community,meeting for next Monday and told the council that members pf the group would ' also'attend the Renton City.Council meeting that night to present a I detailed plan of the groups's upcom- ing activities and intentions. Renton City Council 4/22/85 Page six New Business continued Public Use Referencing a letter from City Attorney Warren regarding Parcel near disposition of public right-of-way under use by a private Longacres individual , Councilman Stredicke requested a status report Race Track regarding another public use parcel near Longacres and questioned whether the individual involved has since received title to the City property. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to provide a status report. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch extended the City' s pride and gratitude to REPORT Assistant City Attorney Dan Kellogg for his major contribution Playtime Court in the City of Renton v Playtime Court Case. She also thanked Case him for the Law Week excerpt reporting acceptance of the case by the U.S. Supreme Court. Senior Stage Mayor Shinpoch invited Councilmembers to attend the Senior Review Stage Review, "So This Is Your Wife," at Carco Theater, May 2 and 3, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. and May 4 at 2:00 p.m. Since tickets are free and in great demand, they should be reserved as soon as possible. Valley Medical Mayor Shinpoch reported that Valley Medical Center has sent Center Survey copies of a community survey to each Councilmember pertaining to their plans for the community. 1985 Population Estimated population statistics in the City of Renton have Estimates been compiled as required on April 1st of each year. Estimated population is 33,700. There are 8,823 single family homes with a 97.3% occupancy rate and an average 2.55 persons per unit; 7,081 multifamily units at an 87.9% occupancy rate and an average 1 .70 persons per unit; 496 mobile homes at 97.4% occupancy rate and an average 1 .62 persons per unit. Total number of dwelling units: 16,400. Seven (7) people were added to the population as a result of annexations during the period from 4/1/84 through 4/1/85; there were 547 new units (all categories) constructed; and 485 residents living in nursing/retirement homes. AUDIENCE COMMENT Oma Bergeron, 808 North 29th Street , indicated her intent Council to become involved in City government , and requested information Representation regarding Council representation by district. Mayor Shinpoch advised that Councilmembers represent all areas of the City and are elected at-large. 1985 Population Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, asked if the above-listed Estimates population statistics are available to the general public. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that copies can be obtained from the City Clerk' s office. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:21 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk Attorneyredicts case become landmark p may "They want us to submit briefs on the By JIM McNETT merits of the case,"Warren explained to SO if Reporter - the council. "What it really means is the """•' ' - Menton City Attorney Larry Warren Supreme Court doesn't like the Ninth + .t basked in the applause of the mayor and Circuit Court's decision." ���""` City Council Monday night for the suc- Warren called the new turn of events 1 ; W"� TE . cessful appeal of the Roger Forbes case "the most significant thing that's hap- '� ,7 ', 10 '\ ; to the U.S. Supreme Court. pened since the case started."He told the nIsi‘t ! > _, ,_,I Seated beneath a cluster of colorful council he believes the Supreme Court is , ' ;-'- balloons with the word"congratulations" "more philosophically alined" with the + ' ,0 's'j ' • -' iv 104'4 printed on them, Warren accepted the city's position than with the position held "f` ;--, Trr'_ - , :,=__ * 'l j praise on behalf of his staff—particular- by attorneys for Forbes' Playtime Thea 3 A " M" ly Assistant City Attorney Dan Kellogg— ters. ' ' - " '' ,5 `- - R.,- . �.-: and on behalf of the East Coast law firm In the city's favor, he said, is the fact , :AO- e ,r ,y a'. < , r',- `` - ,'mot / that has worked with the city on its that it has received significant nation- - 1• ? y appeal. wide support from other groups express- 3 �fr � � •"�"; �\1,; " t •�. �� �" +,, � "That doesn't happen very often," ed in "friend of the court" briefs that • ' "�" u Mayor Barbara Shinpoch said of the high A � l y Y P g have been filed with the Supreme Court. T� k , t ".M ,., fi< courts decision to review the Ninth "There is potential(for the case)to be C * t - Circuit Court of Appeals decision of last of national significance and to be a I _--- -,, -- ` s` 3 November, which said the city's zoning landmark case for a long time to come," ordinance banning Forbes'X-rated thea- Warren said. :y ; " -�° - w ter from downtown Renton was defer- The city attorney gave much of the ", `4 , tive. credit for the work on the court brief to 4= - "Every day somebody threatens to take his assistant Dan Kellogg. ' I you to the Supreme Court," Shinpoch Shinpoch extended the congratulations E 1,., continued, "but few do it." to the council members. 4 When his car failed to start Mondaylong "Three g years and you people have t morning, Warren said, he considered it behaved absolutely admirably," Shin- :° , , � t; somethingof a bad omen, until word poch said. She commended them for a came down that the high court had agreed • See COUNCIL, page A3 Kathy Keolker, now a councilwoman, leads January 1982 protest to hear the appeal. Council . . . (Continued from page Al) staunchly behind the city's effort to ' 'level of reticence uncommon in X ratedmo m sec , politicians. torszone of the cityfi1,17 , aslso int colingratulaitedted "I'm proud to be associated with the city officials for their efforts in all of you," she said,as the council the case. broke into applause for the city "We feel very confident every- -attorney.Karen Sauve of Citizens for a thing is going to come out on our side Quality Community, a group in the end," Sauve said. Hugu . i,uurt t V pUlliU cas _ By JAN HINMAN County Bureau The U.S.Supreme Court will review the 4 city of Renton's case against Playtime Theaters, owner of the X-rated Renton ; ••• '� ' Theater. 1 . The announcement came Monday in � Washington, D.C., when the Supreme Court released a list of cases for which w' review had been sought. The list stated simply which would be reviewed and v > which would not, without going into t reasons for granting or denying review. Renton city officials were thrilled by the news. ' "This is tremendous," said City Attor - . ney Larry Warren. "I couldn't ask for a �t." %.-��" � better thing to happen on a Monday." �` ' + s. - '/ ," "I'm delighted,"Renton Mayor Barba- • , k �� ra Shinpoch said. "I have to be encour- aged that they will hear it." ', ' 3 Jack Burns, attorney for Playtime - ,�, y President Roger Forbes,was unavailable fF' for comment Monday. U The city asked the Supreme Court to . review a decision of the Ninth Circuit ` . `� Court of Appeals which held that Re- ; nton's zoning ordinance regulating the location of adult theaters was constitu tionally defective. The appeals court ,, .., decision reversed a lower, U.S. District , s Court ruling which upheld the ordinance. k :w.- After the appeals court rendered its , f'fr t decision last November, the city had 1 "`, several options. It could have accepted the ruling and ended the long fight to force Forbes to obey its zoning ordi- --:, nance; let the case return to the District ' Court level for further arguments; ac- -1 , / cept an out-of-court settlement offer made by Forbes to shut down his theater ' .. -, z if the city would pay his legal bills of ' $250,000; or ask the U.S. Supreme Court "'.L' to review the lower court's decision. In January,the Renton City Council decided to take the case to the country's highest court. Warren said the city now has 45 days to file its opening brief with the court, "which means we get cranking now." Warren said he expects the,court to set a ; date for hearing the case sometime ` a during that 45-day period."I would guess Staff photo by JEFF FRANKO • See PORNO CASE, page A3 Renton City Attorney Larry Warren announces the U.S. Supreme Court will review Forbes case `- -7 ' ,z, )7(//‘ 46- . ---- __ .. ',.,_ Porno case _ , . (Continued from page Al) • something in that decision which • it will be(heard)this fall,"he said. needs to be changed." Warren pre- The city hired a Washington,D.C., ferred to think that the changes . attorney,E.Barrett Prettyman,ear- would be in the city's,favor, rather • .' her this year to help prepare its than Playtime's. - • - appeal to the Supreme Court. Al- Warren could not give an estimate though Warren and Assistant City of the cost to the city in taking the , • ' Attorney Dan Kellogg have handled case to the Supreme Coqrt. City . ' . _ The complex case to this point, Finance Director Mike Mulcahy es- Prettyman will argue before the timated Monday that the cost to date ' Supreme Court. for the three-year legal battle with , ' "I would love to (argue it before Forbes has been$450,000. , the Supreme Court),but I think it is According to the mayor, the City prudent to hire a known voice,"said Council committed to the cost when ! j Warren,who has never before taken the decision was made to try for ; • a case to the highest court. But Supreme Court review. "We are in . ,! Warren said he won't,miss the city_'s for the long haul," Shinpoch said. ! '' moment in the nation's capitol.."If'I "The council had agreed to foot the ;l have to walk,I'll be back there,"he bill,whatever the cost.", - ;1 - • :said. Shinpoch said she was pleased, Warren said he expects the city's but not particulary surprised,by the ' argument to center on two particu- high court's decision to review the i • . lar aspects of the ninth circuit case. ,"I couldn't afford to be sur- • court's decision. The appeals court •prised," she said. "I had to believe • : decided, Warren said, that the city all along we had a good case." I 'I did not state a sufficient reason for \Varren was not surprised either. • 'passing legislation regulating adult "It seemed to me from the start it 'theaters.The city counters,he said, was headed there,",he said. - that it is a zoning decision and it is Renton began its legal battle with II '.within the right of the city to zone. Playtime when Forbes purchased - ' I The second issue, the attorney both the Renton and Roxy theaters •, -;- - ^said,relates to the court's ruling that in downtown Renton in early 1982. ' • , 'the City Council had "a negative He immediately announced plans to II 'motive" when it passed the legisla- begin showing X-rated films in the i tion. During a public hearing on the Renton Theater,•but the city was ' 1'� .ordinance, Warren said, public tes- able to obtain a temporary injunc- ' •timony was negative, but the,court tion which blocked showing such ,I ' . •• decided "because the people stated films for' the next year. Forbes • • -the negative motive, it .infers the began showing adult films in 1983 ,- it council had negative motives." and has continued to do so through a , Renton's ordinance,Warren said, series of court decisions at both the +was patterned after an'ordinance state and federal levels. ' . • which the Supreme Court upheld in The city ordinance which regu- , it ')the case of Young vs. American lates the location of adult theaters is , -Mini-Theaters. a zoning ordinance which states that Warren wouldn't make any pred- such theaters can't be within 1,000 I ictions about the outcome of the feet of homes,schools,churches and city's case in the Supreme Court,but public parks. Attorneys for Forbes . did take notice that "the Supreme, admit that the theater is within a ; ;I� • 'Court likes to reverse the Ninth' t forbidden area, but argue that the Circuit." The higher court has re- ordine anc effectively bans adult !jl • - 'versed 27 of the last 29 cases it theaters from the city and is there- !, reviewed from the Ninth Circuit' fore unconstitutional. Forbes con- , `Court,Warren said. tends the ordinance violates his I 11 ' In simply accepting review,War- right to free speech as guaranteed I' Oren said, it means "the court sees by the First Amendment. i 'j II 'I Renton City Council April 15, 1985 • Page four ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (continued) Carlson Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification R-002-85 of property located at 211 SW 13th Street within the City of Renton from Residence District (R-1) to Light Industrial District (L-1) (Carlson Rezone R-002-85). MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2600 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City FAUS Funding Clerk to execute documents requesting allocation for Hardie Avenue SW/ Federal Aid Urban System funds for intersection improve- SW Langston Road/ ments at Hardie Avenue SW/SW Langston Road/SW Sunset SW Sunset Blvd. Boulevard. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Letter was acknowledged from Howard L. Sheridan, Vice Metro Bus Stop President,. Good Chevrolet, Third and Burnett, Renton, Third and requesting the Metro bus stop located in from of their Burnett business be removed or relocated. Mr. Sheridan cited problems with showroom congestion, vandalism, pollution by bus fumes, and requested this matter be discussed at the scheduled meeting between Council and Metro. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THIS CORRESPONDENCE BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF.THE WHOLE. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch read a letter she had written to Dr. Gary REPORT Kohlwes, Superintendent, Renton School District, compli- Tiffany Park venting the second grade students of Tiffany Park Elementary School Elementary for the enthusiasm, honesty, and maturity Visit demonstrated by questions during the Mayor's recent visit. Mayor Shinpoch noted that teachers Joyce Hollis and Betty Swanson are to be congratulated. Minority and Mayor Shinpoch reported her meeting scheduled for April 9 Women-Owned with Ernest Walker, President of the Minority and Small Business Business Council, to discuss his concerns voiced at the last Council meeting regarding the City's purchases from and contract placement to businesses owned by women and minorities had been postponed, rescheduled for this date. Mr. Walker had been unavailable for that meeting and the matter was still pending. ( Playtime Theat re s Mayor Shinpoch announced acceptance by the U.S. Supreme Supreme Coins Court of the City's petition for appeal of the Playtime Appeal ___.� Theaters court case and introduced City Attorney Larry Warren. Continued City Attorney Warren verified the Supreme Court "had noted probable jurisdiction", and the City (coordinating with the Washington, DC, law firm of Hogan and Hartson) will submit briefs and argue the case before the Court. Mr. Warren indicated this case has the potential to be of national significance and may be a legal landmark in years to come. The City Attorney praised Assistant City Attorney Dan Kellogg for his tremendous effort and energy expended in this case. Continued Mayor Shinpoch commended Attorney, Assistant City Attorney Kellogg, and their staff for a job well done. The Mayor expressed her admiration for and pride at being associated with this City Council and former'Councilman Rockhill, noting their unity and perserverance over the past three years. -ent^n City Council April 15, 1985 Pave three • OLD BUSINESS (continued) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report NE Sixth Street recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Watermain j Public Works Department to accept the low bid of Grant ' Replacement Construction Company in the amount of $96,497.32 for the W-790 NE Sixth Street watermain replacement (W-790). Committee further recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Water Latecomer Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report Agreement W-792 recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Beckman Homes Public Works Department for approval of the Beckman Homes Water Latecomer Agreement, watermain improvements in SW 13th Street, east of Raymond Avenue SW (W-792). MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN• THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a Committee report ,recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Subdivision An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section Ordinance 9-1102, Chapter 11, of Title IX (Public Way and Correction • Property) of the City Code by adding definitions; Section 9-1108(7)(k) relating to cul-de-sac standards; Section • 9-1108(23)(A) relating to Streets: Widths and Lengths; and Section 9-1108(24)(A) relating to Streets: Widths and Lengths. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Mobile Home Park An ordinance was read amending Section 4-2005(A)(7), Requirements Chapter 20, of Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code relating to mobile home park setbacks and repealing Sections 4-2006 and 4-2009 in their entirety. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Conditional Use An ordinance was read amending Section 4-748(C)5, Chapter • Permit Criteria 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code relating to Conditional Use Permit criteria (parking) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE_ WEEK. CARRIED Side Yard Setbacks ' An ordinance was read amending Section 4-704(C)(4)(c)(1) , Zones G-1, R-1, 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1), and 4-708(C)(4)(c)(1), Chapter 7, and R-21 Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code reducing side yard setbacks in Single Family and Two-Family Zones (G-1, R-1, and R-2) from six feet to five feet. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Recycling An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 7 of Facilities Title IV (Building Regulations) of, the City Code relating to recycling facilities. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE ' FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. • . • • ity Council 3, 1985 .ive _ENCE COMMENT Karen Sauve, 3413 SE Seventh, secretary of Citizens for a jncil Thank You Quality Community congratulated Council and the City Attorney's Office and_extended_appreciatioMor their • steadfastness in the` Playtime Theaters_case. Ms.Sauve noted her confidence that the Supreme Court decision would be in favor of the City. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED. COUNCIL ADJOURN. Time: 8:50 p.m. CARRIED. MARILYN/TAT SEN, Deputy City Clerk • • • • • • CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1985 COMMITTEE DATE TIME CHAIRMAN LOCATION AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Thurs. 4/18 7:00 p.m. REED Council Chambers Metro Transit Center Site Selection; Letter from Good Chevrolet; Council Policies and Procedures COMMUNITY SERVICES KEOLKER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Weds. 4/24 7:00 p.m. STREDICKE Council Chambers * Continuation of The Luckey Company Appeal (Victoria Hills) PPUD-008-85 Thurs. 4/25 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers Honey Creek Associates Appeal, Rezone R-014-84 & PPUD-015-84 PUBLIC SAFETY TRIMM *Subject to change of location TRANSPORTATION Thurs. 4/18 9: 00 a.m. MATHEWS 4th Floor Conference Room Cooperative Agreement with Renton (AVIATION) School District for RVTI street frontage improvement project UTILITIES Weds. 4/24 4:00 p.m. HUGHES - 4th Floor Conference Room Martin Seelig Request for Release of Easement; Exchange of Easement request from The Sunset Group (Sunset Blvd.) WAYS & MEANS Mon. 4/22 7:00 p.m. CLYMER - 6th Floor Conference Room OTHER MEETINGS & EVENTS �,... 1'UM va,vvU.iu,iiuietl wuu;receive,SWdte, ,.revenue in recent montns< -• ' ; Another option that was discarded.was•:•• assistance.for.,food';and..housing;..and`:'•' 'Sohn denied the state was slipping into ct+tbick`ofstateaidforbasiceducation, -"ing benefits-for'another 13,000'dis- • ar pion.Hesaidtheclassicsignsofa ,,-� , • •hich accounts for nearly 45 percent of ;d.people.who are.unable to work. .'re4 in high.interest,tight money,a ;;t -ate general fund,.spending.; Higher..,,•,,._.Eliminating:emergency..,and acute crE runch and an external shock such ' iucation employees:are protected by . care, for, people:,who have :no. health as a petroleum price increase—were not mtracts: ,',,, J.,, insurance: ,r.' < present now. 4.., ..: •.{ •, ' 5{. . j ' State joins Renton • • !! �. ,,., , l ,� .-• spew .'of decision , . : :... ' as s »J ( i r * n orn law ' . ' .. • .'. .,.:try '4' :4 ri ''' o d i '' a._. a n§.1.i I ` t f F i�j�.. ,A`V 5 :j, I,- ,, y„r=A . ` . p 7 { °'. `,r r�' a .•�. o ] r,, r q A�` x ByValleyNewspapers '• •, ,' '+ ter' L and United Press International • .• a t: ` 'k Attorney General Ken Eikenberry Thursday joined -. the city of Renton in a U.S.Supreme Court appeal of a *. ,1, tit t r. '' ''. ,' # zoning ordinance dealing with adult movie theaters. '° x'"< 1 *O f.' Eikenberr 's<� . .� a k3��•�.. , � Q �, ,r ^;�7T V y participation was in the form of a ', v ;.; t ., i x friend-of-the-court brief supporting the city's position. . -;< �,' t , t; : ,•f4< ,. ' ti The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco {/;• � � ;h, �,, •, , k,•.; 1 '� .�,'has ruled that the Renton ordinance restricting the °',n;' " ii` t tr; : s, y location'of adult theaters violates the_Constitution. . • rc,: ,� ',, "; .-1., i ; t 'The attorney general'defended:the regulation in his. - "� ., **. ,,._ ,-'_ ;1, k , 1 f w • -written brief.He'contended the city acted responsibly �,.;,_'-,1,' °��' s ,} �',t•• and adopted the'ordinance:after properly balancing ;. • ,. w„ » <, ,� N , ' , f constitutional rights against legitimate concerns-of the 4\1 �, + . ,' y- r ,r.. . �t,4 „* city. He said Renton officials relied on experiences of •. it $, , , -, " : , F• es ,. T..,•..r other cities and legal precedent from the U.S.Supreme i `' . • 1- %' s ;, Court in adopting its zoning ordinance. �•,. + x "In order to avoid the cycle of decay experienced by i `! l �A..,: ,,A'' - i' t. „e other cities, the' cityattempted to adopt a preventive P P' tt + : t° ordinance to protect and preserve the quality of life in ;. f' , t „ - "; ;. i:,.• , , " . . their smalll community,"Eikenberry said. ' * °� , "We have significant national support on ourapplica- 4 ` ,,f F ,1 <,` `',' ,. "°°``,'* tion to the Supreme Court for review,"said Renton City - ' 0;f'r � ,,ems ,,: • Attorney Larry Warren.Inaddition to the friend-of-the- 1 *" . - ~^3 , .i'` i'� •-, court brief filed by the state of Washington,one also has • ' , = < . ,, • ,' ••,it,',�„� "` a .:- been; filed:by the state of Utah and two other states' {.• .. • � �s k ,:t y, % },� Ea x{ ti,. • :`• , expressed an interest in filing,but missed the deadline: 1 -� yfY .�' E a,4 , .,.,.;`; �. s t4(0� ,' Warren said the following organizations also•have ' r /,, '4 � ' supported Renton's position'with friend,of the court .., • '} } r - 'r M y,,1'' .t briefs: the;National League of Cities, the National ®. Association of Counties,the International City Manage- 1. . f ,,„, .� 4'.. • •• �,'° ' ment Association; the United States Conference of 1^�'* ` r e, • F `'- < r;',' " f , }', • Mayors;the Council of State Governments;the Nation- _ Ji �' • „ �, r* al Conference.of State Legislatures; the National yt- t y ,4tv �' Governors Association;the American PlanningAssoci- `'- ^eR^'l va ai.�y"�' r Y. TAIM�' � 4�m 4 T�`�''K.. , at ,1. ,wrirr , x ,: ation;and a:number of cities in California. � • x , �, , That kind of support, Warren said, "can't hurt:" ' � � � • r Warren said the support makes a difference in that"it' 1 * , t x • ` ;,,, +01t ,A,,,. * i.e. f, highlights and validates our, position that this is,a. � ""` : r . , ,�� " national issue.", '. i ! °' • ` ,. Some of the,support was •spontaneous. As the, organizations learned of the Renton case,they decided, ' r a f, i * " to lend a hand in the form of a brief to the Supreme ft 'A a �.Y t ,r Court.','People'sought us out when they heard about it,'!.. # ( r # aw y r, , Warren said.."And we have other people out ther '` , ""r' <,: clamoring to join us. w , „ f • s In'other instances,Warren said,the city has been in ' / contact for some with the government entities or ' ' , is , • F- organizations, 'especially the state' of Washington:. Renton asked some of the groups for their support,he, i Staff photo byJEFF FRANKO said., ,'•..' - lician, inspects marijuana Thursday ■ See'PORN, page••A3; • haul in 300 000 • g t 21 500 . class ... pigeon drop. grow"ide ho u s s' , Two slick female confidence artists tricked*a 32-yeari • old south Seattle•woman out of.$21;500 at Southcentc'o. . , ,Thursday .in a classic,version of the',!`pigeon drop':.: -'. ' Auburn drug squad this year.The team,now numbering: swindle,Tukwila police reported. , , , •,A'spokesman for the department said the victim was three men,was formed last November..: .. approached by two,heavyset women,one white and one Almy did not have the number of pounds of marijuana black,.shortly,.after, 2 p.m.,in,the;Southcenter Malli cored seized this week."Our scales don't go up that high,"he, • Pretending to have,found a.large wad of cash in aii rrth of said. , . • , . : • •,'.; envelope,the women asked the victim's advice on what s and The extremely pungent aroma of the green pot plants to do;'the:spotCesman'reported., . ;;L. was filling the police bicycle storage room on Thursday: ':.;;,':One..of.the,;women:then disappeared into a store,' area The harvested plants were spread out there'to'dry on:',' allegedly;to.seek the:advice of her boss. She returned from makeshift wooden"shelves. If the .;are simply,stuffed' shortly thereafter and said her boss sug gested ice in into bags,they will get moldy and be useless s eidence, • women each put tip'a large amount of cash or valuables. Almy said., as-"good'faith money, and wait for 90 days to see if ' • cated A 19-year-old Auburn man and a male,transient anyone should claim the lost money. Bob masterminded the drug-growing scheme in 'which ':After,the 90 days;•the women said,good faith money , : Five houses were leased to grow.marijuana,Almy said. , would'be returned to each of them and the original wad Residents were reportedly paid handsomely for ' of cash would'be divided among them. both growing the high quality hybrid marijuana in.the. , The victim then drove the two women to her two bank i a 38- houses, Almy said. "The Renton woman said she was branches' in ,Seattle's Capitol Hill and international • paid$5,000 for growing 36 plants,"Almy said. districts. She gave the women $500 in cash, $1,150 in Kent, The Auburn man was arrested during'a.raid on his silver certificates and$19,900 worth of jewelry. house on South 292nd Street,but the other prime suspect : ' "She gave it to the ladies and that's the last she's seen 'Jana, is still at large,Almy said. of them and probably ever will,"the.spokesman said.He.. { and Other lnnatinnc whAra.i,.,,,">,,.n,,.....,...-- a:__,- . . The contract also provi es Flow •..: ,- '),exclusive license to manufacture cutting machines for A new one-year contract for the ing school ht to sell machines worth - sale in China while retaining t1 Tahoirtand vice princi" _,�as ht been Road. The situation will be mrin- that use the same stretch of oon is cipals toyed, however, and and m m i jet and made in China technologyt is=ZYdtifactu ed in Kent, ratified by the School___ d• drivers will advised busto be alert truce gy to the Currently, lant,will continue . rovides a seven Minton said. He said the ntp raise, matching the the possible•driving hazard, a'disl 'al sales manufacturing the main pumping unit,a critical part of The contract P 'dis- trict spokesman said. ls,whichn percent cent pay Braise, mat teachers Several parents of schoolchildren r value of the Flow Systems cutting tool.fr ndiv d ala pplic percent of have raised questions about schoolchildren meat willr are,built to in iations for individual applications, received earlier this year. ris rased will n built in China. In other business during a board in relation to trucks emerging from is traded Brinton said the arrangement is expected to generate the district's a gravel pit on Jones Road t the weeklarke t. more work for company.. contract'provides for the transportation supeeting ervisor reported same time that buses carrying uI with A final portionchinery for demonstrationthere have been no accidents involv- dents are using the road. . it.and Ex- Pins the of e first transactionbetween Flow Systems • M , ,, •. it "Brinton said."We believe it at of aFlow and the People's Republic, ' Get valuable savings bends — during the mblic.The holds the potential for a significant long-term expan- ' Uniroyal Free Savings Bond Offer! $50 or e Chinese, sion of the company's business in the Pacific Rim."He , 100 Uniroyal l Free bond sentBo Free ooyr ` Ldril provide of said about 12 percent of Flow's total sales are to nations �O� Uniroyal when you buy selected top-quality. fd maintain of the far east. a!tires! or Chinese The company is the:v+orld's leading manufacturer of .. �Q F. water jet and abrasive jet cutting systems for.indust- u`!d'ang pro- lint automation. • F. ration award Porn. ��rn Win® r . ►out $115,000 has been contri- : ;. ., d to the cleanup by the tribe, •(Continued from page-Al) and is no monetary value to the WITH PURCHASE T��$=ECTIB® . . "' ens' groups, private ores There UNIROYAL rest groups, private corpora- city of Renton from the support,but the briefs , - .;�. s and federal, state and local Warren ate Renton's position.Most of pies. lie USDA Soil Conservation Ser- the briefs contend it is impossible . - N - �Y ycxse'�,... ","N-=.."---�;'.' � has committed $1.3 million to for small towns to follow the rules as o U R I, N e S t R A ,A t s ,- , project for'development of laid out by the Ninth Circuit Court of • _ „ management systems Appeals,Warren said. T• •• �pYA�fLA� sal waste s..saAu atdo. `commercial and non-commer- The Supreme Court is expected to PLUS , '� t livestock operations. decide sometime:in April if it will $ ttOtR w�,LUS , accept the case for review.Warren �u s.—' Sit Q mid- N>Es°Ottws®N �i{Y�N6Se�M said the.city might know.by sA ® n�tA1N' . • with w goon offering . . April if the case will be heard by the -SWINGS , : with Pw'A°'° � Touch Radwl • n .high.court. a • 9erson registration :,;:..... r r► ' PREMIUM aig- hline,Comnitinity College will . 1r —I j , ...,,, FINEST special in-person registration .�tk ,�„ ,s� 7- I STEEL-BELTED :ALt;S OUR FI RADIALS` F'UNCf, . SEALING RADI 3d a sped classes 9 a.m.to 2 " • RADIALS r spring quarter o •-. r r�::d m-Saturday on campus. �;7�Q; tigF w registration is,of- v ' �y.,: • ��� : , Saturday gt �_ .. �dc �'����:, The — s� � , convenience of per- ��T���� � � ;red for ,the e�.��`,\ : ( �7 � ���v„s,w�+3 •glar re stra e• thke 1 6v,s • 5OL - sw,,.' 8 m'' • �, usS:.- into • =WM o=imurs are:8 a.m. :to P t 0 w . I,. ,' ,m cunt nuin ' FASTRAK �- yg; , B through April,_ .�. `• o •tg '`J ;,./ •.`� .� wmwiu vm � �,es,wR,a, ,. i• i r tl - , pi65J�R,3 � c ��� �'. . t ,+, P,55,6°R,3 �, .,1.1.E ,.n Spring- k quarter,classes start the _ " ''''4' . ,v,65,6oR,3 .. :. .� spa Fti� .,% i ''; �; illy seek of Apra u.•� - e- FANFARE DINEN P205,=°R,. �.o�. no5rrscus "" "' sR,S s.m ,�i� min ,°em ie " ' EW MENU"`FOR` . P5 111, ro.97 . „ s• • High gnrupoar R�j,:�. - • �. LUNCHES&DINNER:'.. oru�n ' �. . , .. • cnmpete in contest N S U LT t® nior at Remmn Friday Night Smorgasbord "r.I R E" A' ,- 'Barnes,`ta<13arnes a 1 •DAVIO 'CO `'.'. ' 6:30-9:00 6.00 igli•School, has;been selected-to ; compete 'in the-Olympia National Music 8 Dancing at s p.m: Scholastic Typing Contest. Cocktails Available -" 7 2-5 5 5 5. • .The typing competition will occur Sat.Night Menu Service Available 86'07 SO. 212th 8 DaJis•7i at the state and national levels.Each KENT,WASH.98031 `., h' Consults participating school will select one Members& Guests Oaty.. PHONE DICK D'AV•1S student to represent it in the state FOR MORE INFORMATION: �`"" �' FOR A P Q I I N T M E NT S °`'• N championship. The typing test for CALL 226-1100 • ` • Wf�m P' will L... -.� .. .ie • , e He�ntof, this level of competition be RENTON ELKS E"�Y'4` designated busi- '' treseducationca by 1600 EAGLE RIDGE ORME - ' • Hess teachers at each school. •' g �---- - ....,,....".,.,..,....".. 11.,t:A i i.ig w surge prize otterings. He - 4 • Ind aren't limited to three day !ek. ly hurts SKC's game, Hubbard sale doesn't expect the inequity in regula- The bingo games in the Aut irea didn't know if his operation would m tions between the Indian and state- grumbling probably will lose the most pat__-.a.The or close. It has raised net proceeds of controlled games to change. tns getting largest other games in South King $1,500 to$2,000 a month for the center. There's no indication that tribes ever tribe has a County are in Renton and those manag- "This operation is far enough away will have to operate under state n't have to ers don't expect much impact. that the impact of the Muckleshoots guidelines he said and to 'list swee as do all "The people who play bingo will go to shouldn't be greatly felt here," said e where the big money is,and the Muck- Paul Hanish, who manages Imperials away wouldn'tstat regulations ns for everyone amplaints, leshoots are offering the big money," Bingo on the Renton-Maple Valley else make sense. ,plaining," said Terry Hubbard,who manages SKC Highway. "The games that are closer "Why have wide-open gambling for auditing Bingo in Auburn. That game and the may feel a significant difference." bingo when we don't have it for casinos ling Corn- Black Watch Drum and Bugle had been Those include smaller Indian-run and slots and the whole ball of wax? It nderstand the largest games in Auburn,operating games in the Tacoma area, he added. goes against the intent of why we're on different days. While the Imperials and other state- having it (bingo games for nonprofit her tribes SKC Bingo opened in September 1983 4 licensed games are trying to raise organizations) in the first place." risdiction. to raise money for the South King money for nonprofit causes, Hanish Hilands manager Pat Leahy thinks .ing made County Multi-Service Center, a non- said the Muckleshoots main purpose is the new operation is too far to have a big ian tribes' profit organization in Federal Way that to employ their people and make impact on him. "Most of our crowd is none have runs a food bank, offers emergency enough money to pay back their invest- from right around here," he said. Like shelter and performs other services for ment. other managers interviewed, he said he Muck- needy persons. The evening crowds "They have every advantage working most players circulate between various lore prize have been about 160 persons, he said. for them to draw the people in,"he said, games. __- ___ - c — ins 7c�orb"-(Airs',,''/e /- 9f-fs Lawsuit filed 1 against Forbes ributions buyin Iuence?a by ex-owners interests, many of which form fronts • which are known popularly as political; By JIM McNETT C action committees (PACs), range from Staff Reporter the fireworks lobby to school teachers. The former owners of the Renton e Public 1 Put hel simply, special inteance rests ai campaignsor Theater have gone to court to wrest the m o n e lawmakers who, once elected, then vote j theater from Roger Forbes for note interest • I• payment of the terms of the real estate legisla- y • on proposed legislation of direct concern contract. inty and to the same special interests. Robert and Elia McRae have filed a ion. What does And big money is involved, not just a ,o lawsuit in Superior Court against Forbes, not only $10 donation.A winning campaign for the ' g r who has shown pornographic films in the 'makers t buy? Legislature is averaging about $28,000 ; theater for nearly two years. ' y . iterests, and in some cases runs more than$50,000 LIn an attempt to get the theater back he 1985 per candidate for one of the $13,000-a- 1and to "quiet title," or gain clear owner year posts. s prettyY Newspapers today For example,cship,the McRaes also named the city of Editor's note: Valle News a ers take last election's hot Renton in the lawsuit.Renton,according begins a four-part series exploring the rela- 11th District contest between Democrat- r sure," is Sen. Averyto City Attorney Larry Warren,has filed tionship of major political financial con- Garrett of Renton and a claim against the property notifying e, state tributors to state legislators. Republican opponent Mike Kenyon of any and all future owners that they must tod gov- ■Today: Does money not only help buy Kent East Hill. Garrett's warchest to abide by the city's ordinance banning toes be- victory, but also put lawmakers in the hip taled $61,659, Kenyon's$56,637. adult films at that location. ie influ- pocket of the special interests? The above was the highest total in Forbes and the city arc locked in an rending ■Monday:How do the lobbyists know who South King County,but not statewide,forright to to donate their big dollars to? a legislative seat in last Novemer's appeals court battle over Forbes'ri iclosure ■Tuesday:How is big money changing the elections. show X rated movies within i ggle feet y percent "Obviously, schools,churches,parks or single-family way campaigns are won and lost? the special interests are homes. A city ordinance prohibits the the 147- ■Wednesday: What are the proposals for getting a stronger and stronger control j films in those areas. directly campaign spending controls? ■See CONTRIBUTIONS, page A2 special P 9 ITO IN See LAWSUIT, page A2 4th Dis • 20 10-5: " Metals GOP Rep. Mike P of South such as a repeat or a scar""•""""e King County had nost vivid teacher salary law known as e MINI YARD illustration of•such stance. Bill 166—even though Deml Gold,troy. Rep. Patrick,whose 47th District to which the WEA contributed heav- Silver,fint includes Kent East Hill, Fairwood ily, controlled the Legislature in Metals F reported 1 and his home base of east Renton,is 1983 and 1984. York. known for guarding his legislative But Rep. Patrick noted special integrity. It's an area of which he's interest influence also can be exert- p�O Local c keenly aware, since as a rookie ed on a lawmaker through his or her Local qu Seattle police officer in the 1960s,he political party. F I silver coin was one of the five whistleblowers "A member may be opposed in Auburn Pr who helped root out police payoffs. principle to something,but is willing Krugerr The "reminder" occurred in the to give one vote in a committee to get MapU.S.Is v 1981 legislative session, after his the bill out on the floor," Patrick Sheeting change. successful 1980 campaign, Patrick said. He cited as an example the recalled."It was a very hard-fought votes of two legislators who sided in & twills issue,"'and Patrick said he didn't committee with former House Bill Rol Ieotton sports IRSn vote the way his special interest 21, an unsuccessful measure to y po donor wanted. loosen the state's control in setting wear at a special in aut "I had a lobbyist that was just irate teacher salaries. price.Machine and mentioned his organization do- "I talked to two members who said washable,45". WASH] nated a lot of money to my cam- that(H.B.21)was the worst bill that Reg.$3.99 yd. ternal R paign," Patrick said. "I tossed him they had ever voted for," Patrick �� calm prtrica co w .�F` tt _th" A office and said 'nobody said. The reason they did, Patrick keeping _office _Said,was because of the influence of vehicles, buys my vote. vehicles, The other side—the lobbyists— the to chers' lobby. Patrick related Con re also points to successes and failures the two lawmakers explained"they YARD g in the political arena. contri buted a lot of money to the 1985 rec must be Bob Fisher, lobbyist for the party so we thought we had an" 4 which th Washington Education Association, obligation to at least get it out to the Leprechaun MacI operation. the state teachers' union with state floor. TheIR: headquarters in Federal Way, (Next: How do the mechanisms of linen looks acce of exemp chuckles when asked if lobbyists camp aign donations work?) Versatile fabric for Spring cle •Busin suits,with prices that machine; sales per: will suit your budget. on oil,bel logs if thc Lawsuit Washable,polylrayon, &needle: kept on ■ ■ • 45" Reg.$5.99 yd. price groi night. •Comn (Continued from page Al) Burns,could not be reached Friday $ 19 reasons ai The McRae's quiet title suit also for comment on the lawsuit. pany vehi names Kukio Bay Properties, Inc., As,McRae has already forfeited YARD escape thi one of Forbes'corporations,and Cal the real estate contract, Warren 3( ment if th Vieta International, which is also said, technically he should be able to is not to be related to the adult theater opera- assume ownership,"but Forbes is in •Salesn tion. there." who usual] According to the court papers, In his attempt to quiet the title, to call on Warren said, Forbes has not made McRae has named Renton in the suit escape thc payments on the theater for several since it has filed a "Lis Pendens" claiming r months, including November, De- against the property.Warren said a the vehicli cember and January. Lis Pendens is a"notice to the world ible' The IRS "It looks like(Forbes)hasn't real- at large of a claim against the provision ly been making payments since he property." The city's claim, in this collection bought the place," Warren said. case, is the fact that a court judg- "Amendments to the real estate ment has upheld the city's right to contract show the contract was first limit the showing of adult films on for the Roxy (located across South the property.The claim is a notice to SNO-L Third Street from the Renton Thea- future owners that the use of the REP'' PAS ter) and for the Renton Theater. property is limited, he said. Hwy. There was a default on those pay- Warren said the city must respond Rents Sea ments and the Roxy was taken back to the quiet title action. 24 and the contract was restructured. "I've called McRae's attorney ab- KEN Then it was restructured for pay- out entering into an agreement with 25754 ments of only interest for some the city to obey our ordinance if they 0® Kent time." get the property back,"he said,"and O copyright 1985 Fobri.Centers of Americo,Inc. Forbes and his attorney, Jack we w)uld not contest their suit." , t Renton City Council 1 /21 /85 Page three Consent Agenda continued Crown Pointe Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants Partnership of Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Rezone Request , File No. Rezone R-067-84, for +8.0 acres of property located between Monroe R-067-84 Avenue NE and Union Avenue NE on the north side of NE 4th Street , from B-1 , Business, to R-3, Multifamily Residential Zone. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. BENAIR Lease Public Works (Airport) Department submitted BENAIR Aviation Reyision request to lease additional property east of blast fence adjacent LAG 004-84 to main entry of Renton Municipal Airport (LAG 004-84) . Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Six Year Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested public Transportation hearing to amend 1985-1990 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Improvement Program by adding N. 3rd Street/Park Avenue N. and N. 4th Program Amendment Street and Park Avenue N. in order to qualify for Federal 1985-1990 funds for the projects. Set public hearing for 2/11/84. Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, ITEM 6.f. , PLANNING COMMISSION Amended REAPPOINTMENT, BE REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED Approved BE APPROVED. CARRIED. Item 6.f. Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Mr. Robert Patterson, 310 Bronson Planning Way NE, to the Planning Commission for a three-year term Commission effective to January 31 , 1988; Mr. Patterson has served on Reappointment the Commission since 1982. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Wallace R. Wilson, Ph.D. , Pastor of Porno Movies Highlands Community Church, commending Mayor Shinpoch and members of the City Council for deciding to take the Forbes porno case to the U.S. Supreme Court since the case could have considerable significance and positive effect on a national basis. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Planning and a report regarding the Fence and Hedge Regulations, referred on and Development 10/15/84. Following considerable review and discussion on all Committee facets of the ordinance, the Committee concluded that it is in Fence and Hedge the best interest of the general public to continue to regulate Regulations fences and hedges. However due to concerns regarding the following, revisions to the ordinance are needed: 1 ) Intent ; 2) Definitions; 3) Standards which would allow staff to evaluate and approve special circumstances or conditions. Submission of this information to the Committee is anticipated within the next three weeks. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Renton Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Environmental a report regarding State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Ordinance Policies and Procedures of the Renton Environmental Ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance is required to establish local authority over certain elements of the environmental review process. Other elements of the ordinance are mandated by State rules. The Committee recommended that a Public hearing be set for February 4, 1985, to receive public comment on the proposed Renton Environmental Ordinance as revised by the Committee, and the ordinance be referred to the full City Council for consideration and adoption. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Traffic Councilman Stredicke thanked the Administration for correcting Modification a problem with mandatory stop at intersection of Sunset Blvd. NE and N. 3rd Street ; however, he complained about recently installed lane-marking buttons on Bronson Way, which are either ignored or cause confusion to drivers. Mayor Shinpoch indicated Traffic Engineering staff is reevaluating the markings due to receipt of numerous complaints. _r. fix., �� __ __—,, _--_ - --VI UVlGVG-IlGlld, 8J I - ' : IIII�, I HII�tI z , t'•.r . vP i z'-" - Of 7r9 ='y d Cl. r ",k.',4,- f fycp* o.•va.m 3t;;ati'-. OO'ld, 1 P 4- .,._.__. .. _ a.�_.__re_..•-,_ ._:..___� t.. -....._,� - RRI' ,gS6>yaaa[�WliSe al : me k '* SBr 'y».':§ .1r e - a 2,. cep. ±€ cr "� i gt,--,a,_ - »vit,. - - I • +5 ,,., ty{L e: y�^t wo." 'C 'r'F.?oi `q 44 'F a`t.-*� 4*Tfr - "7' {Voiume 61, No. 16 Friday, JanuaryServingRerton and Tukwila, Washington 2�� ,.. , .. .,. . .aid F ' .Y�s'-::.ter' "' - +Z:a„a.�;'�,.�.. ., .... n .... . ., ---. t . h In, - - fo- .. fl: En En : t g q Ate..{' (� •- _ -V ill n •e-', 1•. 1k ' ' , _„,r - -. '-i • - , • '0__ IT g -17 !CC: �' E S:i t,,T14 74 12 iC 1 ht , w' 'k f�' _ ._ ' :7 L ;_.rs a thtr . _ for .',. - fe-tw» } ;y, OAP 3 c _ ,,..'.' • v��. y - -^1 d -+f3� a ,A '.r E' +a ^ hrtit, y� -h.: 'yam'::., e � - _t° f opposition to the X-rated Des Moines attempt by the city to block the sex shows ' .r `3 _ By JIM McNRTT .* , �4= ; =` -.1,,-*-1�'W,, Theater,the Des Moines City Council has '" 3< `.-- Staff Reporter decided to "rezone them out of Des thIt wasn't until 1982, when private, PEKING—China announced Thursday it '4 € ~''. ; }y ::; - _ City officials in Kent,Auburn and Des Moines,".Mayor Pat DeBlasio said. ' - consultants studying th "revitalization" '..� - t ,= Moines are watching with interest the On advice of the city attorney and city of downtown Des Moines recommended plans to bring in foreign retirees to help run its �, �,,��. �, ��. . 'mismanaged factories and will open more cogs- , 4. " ;r ; -f :,„ L Progress of Renton's lawsuit against X manager, however, the council will do the removal of the theater from the tal areas to overseas investment. • f ,, . -; •' U F rated theater owner Roger Forbes. nothing on such zoning legislation until it downtown area that the city decided to �_"^ r As Renton The changes,announced by State Councillor 1 A -E t pursues enforcement of its can review the U.S.District Court ruling become involved in the pornography Gu Mu in an address to the Committee ` ��t zoning ordinance restricting adult then- _ against Renton,the mayor said. issue,he said. of theinanal Peoples he Standinga Coma series ;M zl 1 , ' -. - °�. �1 '• . ` ters to certain areas of town, its three "When Renton lost its case in court,our "That's when it really came to a head," '> Q neighbors — es eciall _ Des Moines, attorneysaid he wanted time to studythe DeBlasio said. 'cif the National industrial reforms announced in # F '< g P Y 'i ofsw es'.. i % a - z . ,. , which also has an adult movie house brief, then come back to council with a The city held public hearings through- :r* Experienced,retired foreigners can help Chi- °"=",� • - ., operating in its downtown area are recommendation, .DeBlasio said. The out 1984 at which residents came out . _ a` 'na its industrial management and s_ a following the developments all the way to council will go ahead with the issue in strongly against allowing the theater to " ogeratio improve its industrial accelerate the training of qual- the U.S. Supreme Court. March,he said,regardless of whether the remain in downtown,he said. i� ople in major industries,the official. = ._ November's federal appeals court de- Supreme Court rules on Renton's appeal. Auburn passed a pornography zoning'' _.= �.,... :_ - - M cision voiding' Renton's ordinance is He saidRenton's - ' X News Agency quoted Gu as saying: . �apublic hearings were held ordinance identical to in 1982, • 4 a a..c country s ambitious modernization drive Staff photo by JEFF FRANKO affecting the way- the local cities ap- when film wholesaler Dick Pappas began City Attorney Jack Bereiter said. The .` s hampered by a critical shortage of technical proach their anti-pornography efforts. ' showing. adult films at the Des Moines and maixagementpersonnel,gartlybecauseof D ' Theater in 1974,but said he can recall no ®See PORNOGRAPHY, page A8. Des Moines Theater has X-rated fare Responding to overwhelming public 4 ' • the upheaval in education caused by the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution.Details,A4. s -.WASHINGTON—Howard Hughes sought to ,4-°; .v n s-i . ti 'like Robert Kennedy's political organization ` ` ° m ;,s F'w minutes after Kennedy died at the hands of an "� , 4b & =xr '''-; ,- g am . _ � t�� 7"Y ejyi.Y,. ,`Y.tA �`"ye d":� � 'y '' �•e,��y, j y,� assassin,according to purportedly .w° t`u,u;.R -4 L A . g P P Y r. �' q.. . based on the billionaire's secret papers.Details F' ~�: ;'` ; , 4' P Pe , :, Asa r : r t` s�.. �.e+��� honor a n �r heroics `,' ,_+. .� ' ;' . " - r. _. STOCKHOLM Sweden-Western nations -� -^.>;1,�' ` i, F '` °' •. w- _ :Thursday called on the Soviet Union to account �', `. 1 t-;-- ',,. „F , ...1` 4 Y, , L w..'�:aµr g ., . r M`.s ( .`: - ." t `a'� •�+• ,,0. �,�.ia ;# 'S. °,,,W''? .t;,ry r�.,* yri:`E i v r,�'f ;a +f., a ,,,C r , , 't`r .;.3 +S r r. r + ), '=r x,;a ,� ` ",;,',.`,l 4 { P e a-' N;;s e Y r .,, r �,,,s 1x , , . }S S' , "'' Viye ' " oi^11,,t',/,,, .}1 4. }'... 3, w '� r;e+u"'"..;Itd _ s�a} � fit+, f vn. �•, }�,h }K � X '�.`u , ' S Y 4 � ��, } M yf *:,.,, �a .iq�OW,. 6�.1...A•e xE7:.r� « I, ''fit .i :n '^� :wr _ +`>. 1"4. ,rt•0 M 5..��+ f*':I', t i K IA" 0;4 4^ %c �,F # 5r .,s Ct..� ':A f,t' y. t 3�} K i "y$y�'1�'S.;y'�� ' � y C, ' a 1 ' ,, * i�» a i• },4. •_ .• it R%i.•T a ff+C i5 .N.;-''4 11 " 'ta,',0 1,' 'ls' 1 r `,• ,"t. A `r E' d..,,.aA v.r Y. ;� t."y,t+'N', yvxr; ?,.. i `"• 'K". ��",t2r� a. �p"R 1`+i r a1£Y..a r-!�F ' R ' K� kx.t•,. mocha, sal maintenance industry beturc he began his career with thority to ui..ca.. Van Dyke, the about the incident's seriousn GSA. He received special achievement awards from the agency in House is expected to decide finally legislators' role in overturn 1983 and 1984. He is a past president of the local union off the Monday. A two-thirds vote in the vote of the people.But most o American Federation of Government Employees and is active in House would oust Van Dyke,seated were expressed behind community and church programs.GSA provides the federal govern- formally when the 1985 Legisla- doors, as both parties"cE ment with management services in building construction and ture's session opened Monday. A privately rather than mak -maintenance,procurement and distribution of supplies,and use and bipartisan select House committee speeches. disposal of real and personal property.GSA Region 10 employs 1,050 unanimously held he had committed The controversy and rep people. an unfair campaign practice, but will make campaigners mor _.... _. __.._.r._ . _ ..-.w_.. .r-._,-- "__..., that it hadn't changed the outcome lawmakers said in interviev ' , ' n•, ..,:gn'n''','Q.."-..':4',, 4`.`,,,!e):'i, Porn • grap i : gi 0 0 Assault charges pending in Renton - � (Continued from page Al) Kent has not yet enacted an ordi- -1 ordinance is still in effect, but its nance regarding adult theaters or � ����� 'r; shooting �� r fate hinges on final outcome of bookstores,City Attorney Steve Di- •" ar Renton's legal battle. Julio said, but its planning depart- Assault charges may be pending . "We just copied Renton's ordi- ment has conducted an adult enter- against both men involved in a nance verbatim and put, it into tainment planning study for about a =y place,"Bereiter said. `"It's a zoning year. The study has bogged down shooting incident Tuesday evening at the Cedar Park Apartments in concept based upon Supreme Court since its inception as other zoning Renton. decisions.It's been successfully de- issues demanded more immediate Renton Police Lt. Mike Magula fended in part.It remains to be seen attention,DiJulio sail, said once his department gets a what the Supreme Court will "Kent is in a unique situation in statement from the shooting victim, V clarify." that it does not have adult entertain- the city prosecutor will decide Mortgi The ordinance adopted by the two meat problems currently," DiJulio whether one or both men should be - cities bans adult theaters from with- said."This is the time you want to do charged with first degree assault. Ali Orb in 1,000 feet of schools, churches, the planning rather than Renton's on A 50-year-old Renton man was parks and:single-family homes.Af- situation, where they started after arrested Tuesday evening after he Real E ter successfully defending the law Forbes was in place." shot a 20-year-old man with a .32 I.i Jud in King County Superior Court,the . Like Renton's measure, he said, caliber handgun following an al- a Wane Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled ,the law taking shape in Kent's leged traffic incident. Police do not the city failed to clearly define a Planning Department would be have a permanent address for the - Fac constitutional motive for the ordi- based on zoning. While the city is victim,who was released from Val- Anance. following the fate of Renton's ordi- ley Medical Center with a shoulder Cash I As there has been no attempt by nance to remain abreast of the latest wound: adult film promoters to open an X- legal developments in the area, it Magula said the Renton man told Invoat rated movie house in Auburn,Berei- will not hold back its own ordinance police the 20-year-old man followed ter said, the city's ordinance re- until the Supreme Court makes a him into the apartment parking lot, "?` Fixed mains untested. But the ordinance decision in the case,he said. 408 Monroe Ave. S.E., then parked }" I will stand or fall with the fate of "Certainly some of the recent his car next to his.He told police the n Differ • Renton's law in the courts. decisions have created additional 20-year-old man jumped out of his . ' As • A negative decision by the Sup requirements for analysis and re- car, armed with an ax handle, and 1 to Court,or a refusal by the court view by the (city)council," DiJulio accused the Renton man of not using l to review. the appeals court decision said. "(Renton's lawsuit) requires his turn indicator. ., 'on the Renton case,thus letting the the city to proceed with caution in The Renton man said he told the no District Court decision stand, looking at the issue. man he didn't know what he was °i "would just:nullify (Auburn's ordi- talkin about, but he said the man Swim .nance), since it's verbatim," Berei- "We will enact the ordinance on g ' i • the basis of the best authority we first took a swing at him, then hit ' ' Advar ter said. "The' flip side is, if it's held have at the time, available prece- him with the ax handle. - ; . dent, which would necessarily in- out ti�I constitutional, well then, we're in saw rser business,"he said. dude the recent District Court deci- , ,!` i A Bereiter declined to speculate on sion regarding Renton, because we ,iii I I �si'r Loam what'the Supreme Court might do are in that jurisdiction." �.,,8 p I.i i If Kent's lawgoes ahead,he said, ti .•-„ 4 * `! ; Oth III! with the case. i �.r; •• "I learned a long time ago not to "it will not vary significantly from .�}'` • .) i'. ; •-. - Spool predict what a court is going to do," other plans found acceptable by :Ilk k , ,' �r� 4 ��"+a€r x , ,' ' +• he:said. prior Supreme Court decisions." t n't' `,u,,, L,�o, 4' `'.' Gene i 51 r ,.z Fire chief issues warning after death FANFARE®INING'- "NEW MENU" FOR c LUNCHES DINNER.iSAruRoav STATEeb Authorities, following an investi- Bukoskey said the incident em- ONLY) true to t gation,"say a fire that killed a 91- phasizes the need for a Fire Depart- ' .is year-old Black Diamond woman ment response to all fires, regard- Friday Night Smorgasbord Tuesday was caused by burning less of how minor they may seem. 6:30-9:00 86.00 debris that she threw onto a wooden "She'd had a fire of some sort in CoclaailsAvailableAl .l m deck of her home. the house earlier that day.To exting- Music&Dancing_•at 9 p.m.•. Black Diamond Fire Chief John uish it, she threw some burning Sat.Night Menu Sernce Available A Bukoskey said it's clear that Gladys material out the window, but she :10/ Discount for Senior Litt tns ''rt Withal Cobb dumped the debris out a win- didn't call us,"even though the Fire . Members & Guests Ault dow after the debris caught fire for Department was across the street FOR MORE INFORM ITOT solve unknown reason.It's unknown from Cobb's house, Bukoskey said. ' CALL 226-1100 ICOP • , ;','. '^At.,,,,,,, ,,,,,„,0'*,,4...„-,,,, a hot meal; Cl - ofv,-.4---i‘-f*4.-4-4,..----..-44--- -,,,--Y • --4---g----. witli grace; EYI , r -.':,^X.,r-.,", i:I.,:t, : " " :r.v,-,,—"`'''.. .;" • ' ' . .':.; 0.7, -,'''''.,=,r ' , •' , -,t • . , _ • . -•:- , --;,:x ,•_,.. ,_ t-tr:-gi: •a=v- '' ,...'*:•. . .--.7--s ---..tt • ,. .1`c....4 .A0-It --...`_''''• -'-'6- '-v g ...,,-'2 4*,r . P -..*:•1•''.'. ;V ' t't&A'' -P- -”,,,fet ,-„'4,`, . ,,,, .,:‘,,^ ,:,,,' ,..,„ r*.• ..-',.. '"_*,,-.1. ,,,,, 4.r. Y,3„;kf ..,-1 .,. -_,„,,, ,.41;. n.A...“. 4. ,.Z.: A -,-•.4-_ , 1 •,-,xt ..-&- - -,.-, ,11 --- --t-- --'?;'--K- i--.--`-1-•akt .‘,..' k-i- .I'.-; tift.-.4 i'': ' V.-1:7-= "7".%:' ..'_ ' 5--,''' %.i;. P-ti.' - ; rAl #4ir: -A;k1/4- 1---7. ;;:..7:, 2,-6:-, - N.x. ...14-,..,„*75 'ri."4 :Pt.S:k. `, ‹.".• ,,,%:i_i',... %,=',.-' ....,,,Z -. IT'qs.: P.Z.•,"- ""..;-`, i's! ''.r.r 0.4- ,,,:.' •••";k-'4•': c..14.1. -1--.'',..,A, . f. „- -.,„ 47..'- -.M i:''P 1 IV Vt'''',.. . Y1'.f:t.'' r.„,.. ,.,"''' - " .:!..,1' '1,.. . ""-e - '• ..',. ..'--; it ,i'.. . zcapplimi-4 ',-11,.. ma Volume 61, No. 14 Wednesday, January 16, 1985 Serving Renton and Tukwila, Washington 250 . .7z,„„tz:,,,.,,,,..,,... ,,,v, „1,,,,,.. ....t,,,, ,,,7_,,-*...- --,..,),,,;,,, ,..!:„..,..-:.r,,,,7 .,.,:"::-..:1--',::_1,=,',i2-,7,.-4-.._:',..,. -: ..„-- -t-;.4.=;...,....;:,,,,,-,,- 1,1.1----4,‘ " :" ' 1-*-A 4. V:'.-''' ''"-' 'te.•*:•-.44> 1-4*'-' ' ''''7.''''' ::.- ''-''''.- '1'. • = .,., • - =,t- -- '' ,,_•:-: . •.+, " Z Z-'',,...••t'•,;-•,th,•-.''r',--•'- ---- --' _-' '-.---1-.`- -..-.-'.."--:-.-.:„,'"-,,,''-.''r.•• .,-4 ,-,•i..,-,, .,.,.,.4,.-.,4*.z.tr..'-•‘-.4''''"'..-:, •:,--I4S-'-=.',c.'•:,_a'•'-'.1_i-t-,'-- ._..•;P-,- ,.;,..*l"-^.-,•---..'.,0.7*0....'.7.,,., _lncker vrns that t..- rt .,.. • . ,.- Supreme Court reVieW.' • ., the city did "what was right, what was thought the decision was easy."It wasn't -, - By JAN HINMAN - : - The city,Warren said,has a reasonable legal"and should try to take the issue to tough,"he said."We all hate to lose.The I, - - - '' -- ICU ES MUSt CO ntolue County Bureau - chance to be heard by the Supreme Court, the country's highest court After a citizens have spoken" Clymer said the , . The city of Renton will ask.the U.S. but he said the high court declines more ..review of the appeals court decision,the council "gcit almost unanimous support WASHINGTON—Federal Reserve Board Supreme Court to review the Playtime cases for review than it accepts. attorney said, the council concluded on going ahead." ' Chairman Paul Volcker said Tuesday interest Theater/Roger Forbes decision in the _ The Renton City Council decided to there were errors of fact that might have Councilman Robert Hughes said he had -rates will decline if the federal deficit is cut,but Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Larry take the •case to the Supreme Court, led the judges to a wrong conclusion. , no problems deciding,to go on with the .,:insisted budget cuts must be sustained for at Warren, Renton city attorney, said. Warren said. Warren said the decision Warren said the council also thought the case. "The court's are upholding all the least three years to have a_Positive impact. Tuesday. . . - . was made gradually during several meet- judges might not have fully understood filth peddlers.It is time for a turnaround r`f SenatieFinance Committee chairman Robert . The appeals court in November return- , ings in executive session. the procedures used by the city to enact and for the the courts to start upholding ;---Packwood;R-Ore.,agreed that a one-year ac- ----,---,g --m--c, r, ed the case to U.S. . Renton Mayor Barbara Shinpoch said the ordinance. some community rights and some family ;.1.14:-- ,--- -,o,•-r?4,,,, . -:rass-the`-board freeze in federal spending would tc;s4-- ,, _, ,,.,,,,„0 District Court for she concurs wholeheartedly with the In addition,Warren said,the case is off rights" not be enough send the proper signal to " f'41-.-4,' ' ' _ , 1 -4 further testimony councils decision to press the case."The public importance and the public has Hughes-added that he hopes Renton ..financial markets and the American people that t',.,t'- %-'-.,.,,,.„-,,,_',„...,_".<1,4' before Judge Walter• council,"she said, "has been unified for indicated overwhelmingly that it wants will win its case and benefit 'other Congress is serious about reducing the$225 1-_,..` .-1`..5`,1';': ".;4„,,„ McGovern who ear- very close to three years, the public the fight continued. communities. ,--billion deficit to$100 billion by 1988. ' ts.,.4 v.,..4,-- her ruled that Re- support still seems to be there,and they "I feel the council made the right Jack Burns,attorney for Forbes,Play :\ "If we pass a one-year freeze on almost ,h - -;.4,-,,,,-.- ••).....k. nton's zoning law (the council members) have absolute de cis ion," Council worn an Nancy time's owner,said he learned of the city's t-:-., .,..I.-4i ,At, :everything,and we fall short of our totals,then -• ,, ) - ,,„-,,si limiting the location faith in our attorneys." Mathews commented. She said the deci- decision only late Tuesday."I don't have we say'don't worry,in 1987 and'88 we're going '.- '-- ‘-''':'.. ' of adult movie thea-- The attorneys, Shinpoch added, "have sion was based on advice from the city's a lot of reaction. I expected it Burns ' to pass more cuts,'they won't believe us—and ,, '', ' ters was constitu-, warned the council all the way,this is not attorneys and input from the community. said he also told Forbes to expect that :justifiably,"Packwood told reporters following , tional. Warren said going to be easy.We can lose."But, she The decision, however, was tough. "It's decision. • ,a i ag with Volcker.Details,A4. he filed papers with said, even with that warning the council an expense to the city versus what we feel "I think they are vending their money Larry vyarren the U.S. District decided the city had to_seek a Supreme is an obligation to the community," she foolishly. But so be it They just don't :Ninciud remembers Kings leadership Court asking to delay any further hear- Court review. said. . seem to know when to quit,"Burns said of President Reagan led the nation Tuesday in ings at that level until the city asks for The council,Warren said,thought that By contrast, Councilman Earl Clymer (See FORBES,page A3) -, : . zi :celebrating the 56th birthday of Martin Luther • i <King Jr.with many speakers combining praise ‘ :for the civil rights leader with attacks on the ,.., . ...._ :uPartheid policies of South Africa.Details,A4. . 0. 1' 0 urt finds Tirrn , 1, =Israel calls for U.N. troops -41.Ilit- , - • , -•-•<-::.....„L„„ "---',',.'',:'-vviibigt •-'' ,:z. -- -• -:,-,,., ‘,"-q--:,,-,,,„'i.i5 la ,. JERUSALEM—Israel Tuesday urged that l iable in landmark '7-X5 :- : ' , ' - ' Itt*:: '''''44'..4344 ' : ' ,,U.N.troops be moved into vacated areas of Lebanon to prevent massacres and factional ..4Q ,-- 4411:-?---.4‘,„ , =.. - , , ,--- :-:::-,- ;:-<,.t,,--pt.4, 1,..v..,,,an,,,, - , --. •bloodshed that could break out in the wake of an . a 8.4 - • - , ,-- ,-.; - i. --t,,,,;4:.: ., ..e - ..;,,,.. ,-kt., . . -.-•-• 4-4. ,.., - : .>, -. ..,-,..,.,.' 4,- :Israeli pullout from Lebanon.Details,A5. decision for faiiing ,,,,,,,,,,....,, 1,,5719:-`0", •-"7,1, ,-'•- '',:-,..-,it'.';-,1 , , ',-, -. , ' ' ' ._ . - .,.-',- „,' 1 "'"'N--.,,,,4''' ,46„,'" , ' -:::Miit.',, -- , ,!(.- ,.;0„:•%;<4' -4-4.-',.----.=:,-;., : '--, ' '..---',,-• '-t . 110ywood honors Myrna by ,...,. •., , „ • 7, • .., „, . . ,i.,..,.-4-e-. ,, ,,,m4,-..,...,t ...;-,.......,...- -•, -4-•„•••,..._,..., .. . NI-i'W YORK—Myrna Loy,Hollywood's film t 0 haft hnrqssmont queen of the.1930s and'40s,was honored i j 1 , �� , ,� , ������ ���„ a�:r� � RecordChronicle Wednesday, January 16, 1985 Page �, " gWf,`�Le ,Y`"9i'µa 1 ^c.aik dac c s 8 fi l SkForssr �� »�" (Continued from page Al) y lthe case. The city o Probably wouldril e will get the Supreme Court to take it the Supreme Court woulate d review the '�t�em®�•� ®� and we will be proved wrong—time case. bygone era will tell." To get a hearing before the Sup- Playtime owns the Renton 'ilea- reme Court, Warren said, "the city ter in'downtown Renton and has has to state a couple of issues the '3 Very strict, but you learned her." shown X-rated movies there for Supreme Court wants to take up and " � � '. Other fomer students,now from their" and about two years. review."`Although the city has the trwa Afte als couit `, 60s, also remembered Gladys Cobb as a firm, issued dinelatte eNov November,hForbes was "itdoe n ht of tmeaa in this heck of a l he ot The � , ,� ', no-nonsense teacher in the classroom, but offered to settle the case out-of- court can simply . readily capable of maintaining order without court with the city. Forbes said he appeal and not hear the case if i l'AW- a.',) } resorting to the switch and the paddle that were would stop showing adult films and" chooses. turn down the ,-•� { s used by other teachers of that era to discipline agree not to sell to an o tte '., ;,-I unruly youngsters. anyone who The issues the city will ask the `� �M While firefighters still were moppingwould show X-rated film fare if the court to review "are not fully de- ' up at city would pay Forbes$250,000 for fined,"Warren said,but theywill y „agi the Cobb home on Second Avenue,.Everett his attorney fees.4 be ',+- ,,�� Swann,66,drove up to a nearby house to give an issues coming directly out of' the, + aVil elderly couple a ride to the Senior Centr. - idea of paying Forbes n Reed said sit well.the appeals court opinion: "<x? , "She was my school teacher in the third with him. "It just didn't feel right A pointappeal, ruing ``�,:`w���< ,, ;: grade," Swann said, looking at the badly t meeting his demands, Reed said, Possible of h g willRenton's be the questionon the experience- - :a';>; damage homer. "you had.to learn.Mrs. Cobb "pay him $250,000 and he'd get ou other reliance on experience wanted you to a attention in class and there of town. I'd rather see it.go to this other cities have had with adult ruling' - ,,..,,.-, s was no monkey business. o _ .. ,,' `s�',*." extent than pay him," theaters. The appealseh court hadt .fa v' ,;e ,,;, She was a good teacher,"he concluded. Burns said after the.settlement seemed to say. each city: to �,Nt„:"�:R ;F, ; Another Black Diamond resident a woman in ; offer'was made,Forbes would pur •- ,';,t=,:.' " "?:; her 50s who. wished to remain anon mous, ` sue a much higher settlement if the gather •its •own experience after a j' remembered a day more than 40 years ago city decided to continue the case in theater. was in place,.Warren ex-, K ,� ,i,�„,• when she was in the seventh grade.Mrs.Cobb court. Plained. N `� + was moving her and other students around in Renton's ordinance specifies that A second area of dispute could y ` the classroom to make sure nobodyinvolve the appeals court finding of ' peeked at ' theaters which show adult movies as "a negative inference"by the city in - ��a,ti'���°l ,� somebody else's paper during a test. ,a�`' ;1 She still vividly recalls feeling terribly not bel located within 1,000 feet of passingcourse of conduct can- egativ inference Warre the ordinance. n said he �E�;, r indignant about the whole thing— •:,„ indi gnan withabo t the whole and daring to schools, churches, single. family could find in the records of the case ' 4 "I certainly wasn't going to cheat,"she said w�h nmes' 1,or000 feetaofsthe uses are dealt with some public testimony ' " ' `;Y, ' firmly. that called for a ban on adult thea- ters in the city. Warren said the i n+i, According to neighbors and former students, hearings,city officials testified that -Supreme Court may be 'asked to .- j,.4.4 Mrs. Cobb traveled extensively after her there-was sufficient land in Renton decide if a negative motive express- r� ,,r, • husband died. to locate. an adult theater without ed by members of the public could t• ••1 �_ "When she was still able to travel, she violating city law, then be inferred to be a negative �', , traveled throughout the world," said a neigh- Warren said the city has to file motive ,on the the law. or the ta.v.,,* bor. "Europe. Africa. I think she went just preliminarypaperspart of the City .l t'�i j about everywhere you can get on a boat and go U.S.Supremeourt review by about Warren l de lined passedch o speculate on `' ` '' "' It probably yearsthe end of February. Forbes would the cost of the action to the city,but UCE ROMMEC P babl has been 15 or more since • then have one month to file rebuttal : he said it would be a small fraction ' Mrs. Cobb did much traveling, accordingto neighbors,who said she had been housebund sometime after thaers and the t ifwould hear city n would decide of the 30he0Forbes already spente by the she said," the past few years due to failing eyesight and l teacher. advancing age.- , . e Harsmntsit • ` (Continued from page Al) make more employers aware of ago in there." about two years ago,"one woman • andse the pay was goo-wanted to keep heir jobs be- potential sexual harassment and Thomas, 89, said she recalled. Risovi remarried shortly after take actionwant it to stop it. s. Cobb every day by News of Mrs. Cobb's death ' leaving the job.She later worked in a "I want to be a betterm world for in person. spread quickly in the community ' discount store,but had to quit after a working women when my daughtere ases and.others said of 1,200, where residents remem- - . bout with pneumonia: Holder now gets out there," said Holder, the ook care of herself, bered Mrs. Cobb as a firm but , works in an office in Tacoma. mother wayf a 13 happens is"And the eyesight was failing, capable substitute teacher. She ' A spokesman for Georgia-pacific like llet and e s ifpeopled Seen virtually house- had been a temporary school prin- couldn't be reached for comment onisn't ,„ veral years, cipal, and had worked as a book- the case. like Michelle me stand up and say, hey,this right'."last time I saw her keeper for the city, neighbors Neither Risovi nor Holier nl m.e. .-_- ,, he. post office was said. "Our hope was to make them A<` Guest 411 cols .n _ , 1 ,., ,..o. t • .. . . . , , 1 vs. ,,-.-.44001-i.';` - . . � Let high court decide Forbes case om_ By CHUCK SLOTHOWER assured a broad base of public support.Incident- ordinance when Forbes sued the city. Forbes' CQC Coordinator—Renton ly, the ordinance was in existence before the appeal of McGovern's decision resulted in the 1 Renton Theater was acquired by Roger Forbes. 9th Circuit Court decision cited above.The city In a recent editorial the'Record Chronicle The Renton ordinance does not ban X-rated also took Mr.Forbes to court.This took place in recommended that the Renton City Council end movie houses from Renton. It leaves plenty of Superior Court under Judge Holman.Again the their court battle with Roger Forbes by accept- choice locations for the porno movie business. decision was that the Renton law was constitu- ing his offer to settle out of court for$150,000. Locations that are probably much better than the tional. In addition, Judge Holman ruled the ' This guest column is in rebuttal to that view. location of the Renton Theater. The ordinance movies at the Renton Theater violated the I am Chuck Slothower,one of two co-chairman does not prohibit the showing of X-rated movies ordinance, were a nuisance, and should be of a Renton citizen committee called Citizens for at any location in the city.It's perfectly legal to abated. So now we are at another judicial a Quality Community(CQC),which over the past show them even at the Renton'Theater.It does crossroads.What is the city to do now? years had tried to act as the Voice of the people of however;zone those businesses,X-rated movie I remember three years ago, the people of the City of Renton to the City Council. The houses,_which show only X-rated movies to Renton were informed that this question would Forbes vs.Renton case on the constitutionality of: certainleaations. The Renton law simply con- go this far.-Let's let the'constitutionality of this our zoning ordinance for X-rated movie houses •'',trols'the-locations of X-rated movie houses'to -'ordinance be'decided by the Supreme Court. has recently been heard in the 9th Circuit-Court areas where the citizens, through the Renton -The many citizens of Renton; who'have ' of Appeals,after a lower-court decision favoring City Council,feel the presence of these busines- supported the city so far, we have 15,000 the city was appealed by Roger Forbes.The 9th ses will have less effect or be more compatible signatures' and 100 businesses supporting us, ' Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the city must • with surrounding land use.Seattle has just such a have already weathered along,hard battle.CQC, , present our case to the U.S.District again for a zoning law,a law which has been upheld by our as a committee has been involved in picketing, new decision on the Renton ordinance with courts as constitutional. Of course, our courts community meetings, demonstrations to City further burden of proof on the city. This have upheld again and again zoning of schools, Council,why we even had a parade and we even development gave the city two options.The first: book stores,library,etc.,to make them compat- sent a representative to Washington D.C. The city could now comply with the ruling of the ible with surrounding land uses. Why give We know the exceedingly fair law we are 9th, or the second: The city could appeal the special consideration to porno theaters? Our defending has a broad•base of public support. ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. An offer by ' adversaries tell us it is necessary to allow porno People with widely divergent views on the Roger Forbes to discontinue showing X-rated theaters to be wherever they desire to prevent subject can still find a common ground-in this ; movies at the Renton,Theater'followed im- abridgement of our First Amendment.This can ordinance. Let's not buy a short reprieve with 1 mediately;this gave Renton a third option,one be the case in less carefully drafted legislation $150,000;we still haven't lost the war.We have which is a tempting way to end a long and tedious but in the case of the Renton ordinance, this neighbors watching us: Redmond, Bremerton, and confusing distraction for the city and one, 'charge is nonsense and only serves to.generate a Bellevue,Des Moines.If our law can be proved which at first glance many citizens will favor, , smoke screen to confuse the public and discour-' to be OK',these other communities,can see a way but Iet us look a little more deeply at the issue. age more citizen involvement in this issue. to tackle the same problem. t The ordinance zoning X-rated movie houses in The Renton City Council and attorneys have In conclusion,we say that after three year's of Renton. to locations away from schools and done a commendable job of drafting and defend- watching the Renton City Council and attorneys churches was adopted by the City Council in the ing the Renton ordinance. The ordinance has respond to the desires of the people with such spring of 1981. The council acted in a very been tried in the U.S.District Court under Judge success, let's let them make the decision but, thoughtful and fair manner to adopt the ordi- . McGovern and ruled to be constitutional.This is. CQC would welcome an appeal. to.the U.S. .nance by holding a series of public hearings.This ' the court that was charged with ruling on the 'Supreme Court. 1 r ' SOU DING F • Should Medicare payments be frozen? ( lease clip and mail) To the editor: . ' ' ' Print or type response of not more than 75 words for the Jan.13 question When the Administration trys to come'up with,ways to cut'the budget - and send to:Sounding Off,Valley Newspapers,P.O.Box 130,Kent,Wash. why must they first attack the aged,poor,sick,and helpless?They could so. 98032. i easily meet their,budget aims by cutting just slightly into the"fat"of this To the editor: , land. . • Many of the aged are defenseless,and have paid on this insurance policy • . . for their later years during all the working years of their lives'.Please let us' . ' not deny them decent,affordable care now. , Robert Cherrington • , • Enumclaw''. '•'..• , To the editor: .' • . • We will tell you what we think,of Our'Medicare proposal. , • ' Not a hell of a let and it's a time bomb(a chain). • • . ' Anytime one messes with our livelihood we've earned,they are asking • • for trouble and creating a lot of desperate people. One would think with all the so-called educated people in office,they , ' could come up with a more intelligent way to tighten their belts and be , profitable. . They've taken us down already and we are adjusting. . . • ' ,' .. Has President Reagan forgot about the roar of the lion? S ' , •Our comment to Reagan-You can do better than that. ' • The family's of'2,493 Stumpfs, , •Heaths,Fergusons,Grubbs,'Albright, ' • . Neffs and Foresters . ' , . all of Washington state - ' To the editor: NO, medical costs are unbelievably high. Hospital salaries are'out of , , sight.No'one is worth hundreds of thousands a year.This high pay is one of the main causes of high prices and more tax money to pay for all social . , , services. ' These high-paid people do not,in my opinion,pay their fair share of ' . income tax because of all the loopholes.Go after the cause;not the end. ' . .Lee David I . • • Maple Valley . The next question ' : ' • Should the city of Renton settle , legal dispute with Roger Forbes? . (Print your name) ' 'Roger Forbes has offered to leave Renton and take his X-rated movies with him if the city of Renton will reach an out-of-court settlement over (Print your address; including town) legal fees.The decision rests with the mayor and the City Council.Renton's (print your phone for verification only) Citizens for a Quality Community say the city should fight on. Valley Newspapers'Sounding Off question for Jan.13 asks:"Should the (Sign your name) city of Renton settle legal dispu e with Roger Forbes? . , ForbesVab'irne Renton , not him for" X-rated movies in city By JAN HINMAN looked back over the last year of County Bureau legal battles."We won one and we 1 In the battle over an X-rated ' lost one in the last year." theater on the main street of But the mayor wasn't ready to Renton, the city scored a major , ._ throw in the towel. "We've had a victory with a Superior Court rul- setback. We still feel we have a ing in its favor in March, but was '• chance to prevail."She described dealt a blow by a federal court x w ; ''f the mood at city hall as"doggedly ` m� determined.• ruling in November. Despite any �«..,�„�y,,' � , court rulings, however, Roger - .- A The public, Mrs. Shinpoch add- Forbes has been able to continue ed, still appears supportive of the showing adult movies at the Re- ' city's efforts to close the theater. nton Theater throughout the year. Warren agreed. "The city as a While Renton city officials shiv- f • whole feels like we've done some- er in cold and huddle behind °` ;;.l; thing admirable. Everyone feels • trying to decide their we acted responsibly." next move in the Roger Forbes : , That might be everyone but porn theater case,their adversary . * • Forbes, who criticized city offi- is lounging on the beach in sunny . • ., cials for the amount of money, 1 Hawaii. ' about$300,000,it has spent fight- • - Forbes,who started 1984 as the ,, ing him."They have been derelict _ acknowledged"Porn King"for his ., in their duty to the citizens of , string of X-rated theaters,sold all - >'...otialk Renton," he said. Forbes, howev- f ., of the theaters this year but one— er, has spent about the same the•Renton Theater. By phone Roger Forbes amount of money.Asked if it was from Hawaii where he now lives, worth it to him to spend that much, Forbes recently said he's keeping ry Warren said the city has three he said money was not the impor- The Renton Theater operating on- choices—appeal to the Supreme tant thing."The issue has been the - ly because he can't reach an out- Court, let the case be retried by important thing. I'won my point of-court settlement on lawyer fees the lower court,or settle.The city and that's all that counts." with the city. will decide its course of action Forbes is willing now to get "They're the ones keeping the within the next couple of months. completely out of the business of movies showing — not me," he The year'1984 dawned a little adult motion _ declared. brighter for the city-than will „ pictures, he said, Forbes said he feels he was 1985. A year ago, the city had in because a lot of things have vindicated by a recent ruling of hand a federal court ruling which changed." The long battle with the Ninth Circuit Court of A Renton played a part in his deci- pPe- declared their ordinance constitu- sion to quit, he said. "It was the als. The appeals court-remanded tional. Attorneys were preparing fifth or sixth major case I'd had. the case back to a lower court for for an upcoming fight in state You do wear out.It's not a business • further exploration of the motives court to try to enforce the ordi= of city officials when they passed nance.The city won that battle and , I care to be in anymore." an ordinance limiting the location the year continued to look bright. ' If Renton will pay $250,000 of of adult movie theaters. Forbes Next came ,the.arguments, in his legal fees,Forbes will close his believes the city will settle with May, before the Ninth Circuit last porn theater."I thought I was him now that he has had a favor- Court.And then,a long,long wait. making them a nice little Christ- able court decision. Finally, in late November, the mas present„Forbes said of the "I don't think there is any place appeals court ruled. settlement offer. If they don't , , ' for them to go,"he commented. "Losing in the Ninth Circuit was accept the offer, Forbes-predict- .! But city officials aren't sure a blow;" commented Renton ed,"they'll probably end up giving that's the case.City Attorney Lar- Mayor Barbara•shinpoch as she me a million dollars." 1 1 r.,.. , • Page'A2 Friday, December 21, 1984 Record Chronicle • :r.; is Tukwila resident loses $10,000 Renton sui is chat • ` e s tO et A 32-year-old California man has been charged walked tom ® � in King County Superior Court in a"pigeon drop" called to ano II 1 scheme where a Tukwila resident was bilked out She repeated ° ■ #' of$10,000. half the mop Prosecutors have charged Marshall A.Rhyne prove they c€ `~ with first-degree theft andare asking that bail be if and when Deputy Pr ♦� set at$20,000. • so the tax can be computed. According to court records, the male victim papers,alleg ByJAN HINMAN: City Attorney Larry Warren said 'was in the Southcenter Mall the afternoon of where Rhyn j Staff Reporter Forbes has not paid the admission Sept.25,when he was approached by a woman,as bank and ret yet unidentified.The woman said she was from containing Renton Forbes and the city of willtail in a year.taxes for end of 1984,a he South Africa and asked for help getting to an money in tlx p. Renton are at it again. owe for a year and a " i,:;.Forbes, owner of Playtime Thea- quarter.The tax,payable quarterly, airport or hotel. She showed the victim a large The victir e �'ters which bundle of money. withdraw $1 . operates ,the X-rated is levied at 3 percent of the price of The victim agreed to help,and the woman told from home, e' xbe ind in moreoftn a on each admission,Warren is him that the money she had would be taken from where he w &: =:t<iehind in payment admission In addition to the admission tax ;;taxes to the city and Renton is filing issue,Warren said,the suit asks that her if she took it back to South Africa.As the two when the v; t %a:lawsuit to get those taxes. Forbes be forced to the city's obey • `. ' Forbes' attorney,Jack Burns,re- laws relating to disposal of garbage. - plied swiftly to the lawsuit: Warren said Forbes no longer has a • R. "Simply deduct it (the tax) from dumpster or garbage cans at his ` ' ,rk'1►.. •y'` ;_ .. x € , , • " theater and that is a violation of city �,' ,,, . r •.�•t .;, t ,,, ' 1 _. the amount. they owe Playtime. • ''° Burns contends that the city owes law. 'y` `' *: -,,' 'I =J Forbes and the city have been x,,, ! :. ` -; `,, • �' Forbes about a quarter-million dol- a,:,<. battling in court for the last couple $ „0 �,4:,,,,5 a,�;. lays for attorney fees from previous g 4 ,,,, ;>,,,; ,.: �' legal battles between the adver- of years, almost since the day �iJ.,,:e '-.;r • L ti;sr awe `t M�~ Forbes bought the Renton theater. ' ,+� ,w� h series. -.. ""'*" i Mike' Mulcahy, Renton finance The complex case has been heard in ,,`'� :,=$:, y �, <1 both state and federal courts,with ;41,.� , G=I director, estimated the taxes owed �, �::<ti;;A,: „ } the most recent decision going in ,:- 't,� , e , >^,.• ''€, j Forbes at$4,000.That amount is �,.. ;, ��`''" '��_'' °, by „ based on admission taxes Forbes Forbes's favor in the federal Ninth - �" �. ��,s. =�`� ;,� paid in 1983,but Mulcahy said he has Circuit Court of Appeals.Following . 4i r, .. w r _ ,,•, no may to know the volume of. that decision, which would remand ,,t,1,;. Il', f ` business the theater has done in the case back to U.S.District Court ; '-`'° , ;, ;' 1984. The lawsuit; which is being for further consideration, Forbes ,,, F 7 . • k ,,: 1; filed in King County Superior Court, offered to settle the case out of •'. .,-,( , J , • eno asks for an accounting from Forbes court. , - `4 ' " `' ,� i��l ` •+ .Y* 'era" " n " 1s- •t • t. `1' k,.t, ■Vincent •L. 'J't' x4gn fie' ..5� new Paci• fic Car chief . , , £ M ' B•"JANET LaBRANCHE :i; y E ", Staff Reporter i.• u' ••', In a move that reflects the wishes of Pacific Car & Foundry's parent ' •;.•:;.company to turn the financially ailing division into a profitable military 4 , contractor,Vincent L.Jones has been named executive vice president and x r^ ' , general manager. ""V ' ^° Liu IJones is the former president of the BMY division of Harsco Corp.,based , acbmokyam- s s in York, Pa. BMY is Harsco s main military , ^y {, • • , n. �• ' a aA 1,? ,'. ` '} ,' contracting arm,said Jack McRae,information 01 al' w ', z t: ,4n•,. officer for PACCAR, Inc.,Pacific Cars parent 1 i company. Santa (Sam Zorich) captures the hearts of kids al :•eat 1 �. i i,r * ' In his previous job,Jones was responsible for �: N `5` domestic and foreign marketing and production ■ '-:-:: '1 at e � :- .. c .i,.. nR 1li4A� •.�A 11d_1(IQ 91R cp f-nrnneUed A rA'k 1�1 �1+et k -- , , -- __ , _________ • , Porn-film settlement • • draws little interest byyRenton offic ia ls By Monte Enbysk Supreme Court. ; Journal-American Staff Writer Forbes,who now lives in Hawaii, . Renton-officials appear more in- made the settlement offer early terested in going to .the U.S. Su- this month through his attorney, preme Court than paying Roger Jack Burns of Bellevue. --- - Forbes$250,000 to stop showing X- Burns said he hasn't heard from ' rated movies. • ' the city and isn'twaiting around. Forbes'offer to end along legal He said he Will seek about battle is viewed as just one option to $350,000 in attorneys'fees and court the city — and not necessarily a costs from the city.The request,he • satisfactory one—by Renton City said,will be filed with the 9th Cir- Attorney Larry Warren and other cuit Court before the end of the , administrafors. week. , ' ' The City Council held its second "After the courtrules on this,the ' executive session on the matter this settlement offer will be with- week. Afterwards, mayor's aide drawn," Burns said, adding she • Mike Parness said, "We're still wasn't sure how long it would take checking out all our options.We're the court to rule. making calls to Washington, D.C. The Supreme Court is still one of WARREN was unavailable.for our options." comment Tuesday but told council i He said it could be early next year members last week he was uncom- • before a decision is made. fortable with Forbes'offer. ' Warren said that if the city ac- -• ' ,THE 9TH District U.S, Circuit cepted the settlement offer, it ' ' Court-of Appeals last month re- would be unprotected if Forbes sold versed an earlier federal judge's the Renton Theater to another per- decision and struck down Renton's son who started showing X-rated I ' ordinance restricting adult movie'— films. '.''" F ' _ -.! •theaters. Likewise, the Roxy Theater , The court said Renton failed to across the street, also owned by. ! prove it was not attempting to limit Forbes, could start showing adult I freedom of speech with a 1981 ordi- films.The Roxy now shows gener- nance banning adult entertain- al-release movies. ' ment within 1,000 feet of churches, On.the other hand, Burris coun- I , parks and schools. ' 'tered,if the city doesn't agree to the ; The case was sent back to U.S. settlement and continues defend- District Judge Walter T. McGo- ing what he calls "a bad ordi- i vern,who in 1983 upheld the.city's • nance,"its legal fees maybe astro- ,I ordinance- as constitutional. But nomical. • - i city officials have until the end of "It would be in no better posi- February to appeal the ruling to the tion,"he said. j i • ':'ate«- .�fN��-_ p. . ..1���� ��;.vT�3 ,�. `1 � ,+, - � c 'c - _- y Seven super rT .- 1-��- � The makings_ Oa®=�n stuck kL. > > N , :.•. ' - Seaha ks K '4 -,: >. 1;. k. of a wreath in Kent , 8 a �9- 4 -'-, .tea �, = � `. rr'x `.0 : y :� • Se . . h". , _ All that it takes ®is Disposal . , . ,- -'' -kr� « s. attle s Pro 4 p company , • a x °,�x,����.iF�'�..:,d_>'��-" .' ,s z e ter y tvN ti ,.. 0.....r.•'2 _ .>.t` � T Bowl contingent is €°� �1z ,� f• is a little of this, :, pulls out of accord , r\ .�- largest ever; B1 % ; a ;, „,zo = - �;3 � f A: a little.of that; B5 - to clean wastes; A3 • -r • ~ > y i• �r _., Y ' -''' s'"h«- 1,., ,, ,.. T"s * '�s " `_ - .4 • . ,..- , • ' .' s . .�,: Sr F x : ~ 4 tiX _ v . fix. a+* i � 2, Y,, . , .JCoprr/ght.1984 Volume 60, No. 299 Thursday, December 13, 1984 Serving Renton and • ..,'.. -- s. - «'-k• =#?.- Tukwila, aY, Washington 2+ 50 ;.. .r � ._;�" �. .�.i' ` ' . .�',. yr :iL ;.. xx•;a: k;+Gi3.,5 �r;.y sA,; S e - *t a_. .r,. r u, . . ,i.f . kg wW. 3re -%J�. '�- L`.-' �: s aK ��r Ts�`44 5� - - hu -- ' , ....,.._ . ..,_ ...,.,... , ., , --_, . _ . ...,,, _. , __., . , , . '. :-...42''''....-1 ' ' , - "- r al' S a :. - -...-- r to bill - it . I _, - -' Iran ve n, ! B JIM McNETT he said.. "The 9th Circuit Court essentially action,he said. y "Where we go now is up to the city,"he verified the position he's taken all along, "This is a three-year thing and the Staff Reporter said. "The option of when and where to that the ordinance was unconstitutional," amount we budget for the city attorney _ }.�. 4 - hijackersThe attorney for adult theater owner appeal is theirs.An appeal may be heard Burns said. varies,"Mulcahy said."Generally,litiga- . . . • .. - Roger Forbes said Wednesday he will by the 9th Circuit Court,or it may not be, Burns has maintained that settling the , tion costs are going up.We're sued all the ime Minister Hussein 1Viusavi of Iran indi- seek more than$300,000 in attorney fees depending on what the city does." case now for$250,000—with the condi- time for a variety of reasons." cated Wednesday that his country will not from the city of Renton within the next .City Attorney.Larry Warren said the .- tion that adult movies would no longer be The city has allocated $100,000 for its - two extradite four men who hijacked a Kuwaitiweeks unless city officials agree to mayor and City Council are still consider-. shown at the Renton Theater— would 1985 legal fund, compared to $50,000 in airliner last week.The United States has de pay a$250,000 settlement. ing their alternatives before responding cost the city less than it would to go on 1984,he said. • .manded that the hijackers,who killed two "We're still putting together the numb- to the circuit court's action. Their deci- with the case:Warren,however,said it is " e don't know whether that will be ;Americans,be extradited or prosecuted. ers, : attorney Jack Burns said,, but sion,he said,"won't be for a while yet." difficult to predict what future litigation adequate or not," he said. The official Iranian news agency quoted the they'll probably be in excess of$300,000, If the city chooses to do nothing, the costs would be. If the city agrees to settle the Forbes prime minister who was in Nicosia,Cyprus,as -and our(court)costs in excess of$20,000 . case will go back to U.S. District Court . The cost to the city of pursuing the case case out of court, Mulcahy said, the I :saying,"if handing over the hijackers was or$30,000." ' Judge Walter T. McGovern, whose ear- so far has been approximately$300,000, settlement money would come from the lawful,they should hand over the terrorists who Burns said filing a request for attorney Tier decision upholding the Renton ordi- according to Finance Director Mike Mul- 1985 contingency fund, which stands at have martyred hundreds inside Iran and who are, fees is the only action he'can.take on nance was overturned by the appeals cahy.Some costs have been paid from the $324,000.. now continuing their activities with the support Forbes'behalf following last month's 9th court. The appeals court ruled the city. city's budgeted legal fund, with the The finance director said the city must of the Americans and the French." Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that had not justified the motive behind the remainder pulled from the contingency , lean on its own assets to pursue litigation Meanwhile in Frankfurt,West Germany,two struck down Renton's ordinance restrict- 1981 zoning law that bans adult theaters fund, a special account.set aside for such as the Forbes case because insur- Americans rescued from a hijacked airliner in ing X-rated theaters. The next move, within 1,000 feet of homes, churches, unanticipated"expenses,Mulcahy said. ance will not cover the costs. Iran were examined Wednesday at a U.S.Army including a possible appeal to the U.S. schools or parks. .The contingency fund must often be "An insurance company isn't going to hospital,where they were pronounced as"in Supreme Court within 90 days of the Forbes, Burns said, was "obviously tapped to supplement the legal fund due insure any ordinance a council might satisfactory condition but extremely tired." appeals court's decision,is up to the city, gratified"at the appeals court decision, to the unpredictable nature of court pass and try to enforce,"he-explained. Details,A4. . _ — -.,.::;;72.;.-. i.i.,; ..•:i-:,• - -'�-• - - '( r r - : - - a - .- ;!',. r i,`Y`• / - -. _ ' CfikC _'k;a: .V-r.-. •s.+.•s: 3�' "- ,%+--m? ... ".> v� ,ei -r�,v-.•`+. >70 :4w - - The Seattle Times x ° rt f cThe S l�� t�, ,4 r : r i 5 , A "t' - - 0 p� pia . k : ���® ������� fi� Y®iii�E1��� r1 4 i Sports roundup H 5 Wednesday, December 12, 1984 n 4 r4 _• M . n North calendar H 7 .:....:::..:.::::..:.. t • .- IA ANC - ... Tie r - ;_ r: Ff. .. •pi ._,y • x * es e'''"I , s-y "• t- w- ._'% Ai- 4'f _ -�...''fi�y .� '.r:' 2 FyK' ,,, tatr .;.. -K: ' rfr :r * frs '' S+` r4x►•,; ti• _ } r. = ,;Go.•. • ., py Carolyn Casey consider the offer as well as opinion..Others are left questioning nesses operating in the zoned some existing. Then, it must prove • r" ;Times suburban reporter several other options it has avail- whether their city's laws will stand areas, werequestioned • bythe the adult businessesCaused secif- can't restrict adult duat•the San'fe able. up in.court. While at, least one-_ court. p we have them and at•the once.A; is problems. A new twist has been added_to At,thin point,•were consider theater; owner is; :re•oicin� ,'the.:--:: : Warren``s " time other opinions adultbusinesses, ine that ohcy,.• '.lemon's battle to end adult mov-,' ing.everything,"•he said:.'`:`This has decisio �' " the..-Case:,'J -g_„ aid.the°city,has not :::.;Renton's,zoning aaw-.was..writ=;" we have • fa"businesses, n thet_. rI, saying is closed: :;decided..:whether.' it. will ,appeal to. _ten::before there were any adult": must begrandfathered in'wh �- -°ies::The attorney for adult theater been:going"on'for'a long,time; But',=' on"regulating`adult businesses. the`:U.S. Supreme Court•and.;risk-: businesses in't en-the , :owner Roger'Forbes has suggested,' :who;,knows. It could go on,:much ,:,.;About two;.weeks.ago, the,9th the ustices refusing hot evid nc it- laws change," Warren said. ..,._,. -the city..'pay'Off his client to the .-,Ion er. J- s ng to hear ,it, `'forced' to'°rely:on evidence'.from •�'. 'This could be a real problem.; g - District''-U S District Circuit Court return. to_U,S.,.District Court: for: .'cities-such as•Seattle •and Detroit for,the cityof Des Moines ' tune,`,of$250,000. ::•,,Meanwhile;'--,the latest;- court :.o>;Appeals in San Francisco struck another trial, accept:Forbes' latest• about'the ne at where;•; If. the city writes out that . 'decision in lemon's case:has:left.° :down'•Renton's three-Year-old,ordi= offer•or•drop..the.:isue g .1ve,impact on.the :an, theater has been operat-a `check, attorney Jack Burns of attorneys throughout the:',•region:, riance, which :restricts:adult-busi= council_wiIl The city' .:community from such-businesses: ing ; Des year During the l- ing not decide.until Janu The court said 's di .woat hap- 'year; Moinesd, draftinghas een ho tiiiig •Bellevue promises the porno mov- `;.;grasping for;,answers in'the un- '_cnesses`thcdugli zoning :' ,:' , a __ - - • �g• 'ies will end and both the city and 1:<1;clear legal _maze of regulating ,:, ':The?o pinion :.written bycircuit pen tons other cities did`ina prove hed nanc and, a zoni p. . ., -., ,.-: it He :said :;the recent decision Renton's need for an;ordinance.:It: ordinance that ng` ',his..client. will be done with what ';,.pornography.:.:;.: ; --,r;_!';- .,:'t judge:�Betty,Fietchei, said Rentop: added a new twist to_ woulde rslHigli:'; 4 has:been an expensive three-year -One crt has the-'already also said, motive did. not;_prove a;:.adult businesses to the.site's High-, xP y y postponed�• 'a-'' colild��riot restrict-adult theaters tangled' well of opinions `on adult legitimate motive for the rugs,,-•� way799 border. If passed, it would:: -leg ht. . '• planned hearing on a similar zon- simply because it objects to .the businesses. His interpretation is tion outside of the fact that Renton on's city attorney Larry ing ordinance until its attorney can 'movies shown: Renton's motives that a city cannot restrict adult didn't want adult movies there. : ; Warren. said the city council will wade through the recent court as well as the, feasibility of busi- businesses until -it already has "Now they're telling us that we Please see t ��� on H 8 �'. :' . . ... . • • • • . n a •. . . . . : ..... ., ", . : :• s • --:- ; N •r°:9Nr ;/ 3a � H fimvw vJ-� ?. w:;:.:t.•.0 ::: : y � ., ^ ' .•„,,,. _ . . . .. . ......._:.1.,.: • . _ w,,.!,...A,: ].!,,i,,::„,,..:,..0,.,:60,0.,.4.,1,...:,4,41:41... . . . • . . . • .,•,„....::410„:0?„,„„a„tzsix144.=,...azwo,..... „. ....:. :,..,i„„,.a.„;,;::::„:0,,,;.,:.,..,,,,..;:•;;,;•.,.:,..*,,,v:.,_ .v:......3.,.. ..,.:,75:•:•,.;..t.,:„...,.:,:,... 4:ii....,z.,,..w.... ,t,.• ...,,4,•e„...0.„.:004,,,ia.4,..,:,... .44.010..mtwoo...1.,",,,..7..; . . , ; � �� ���.. %G% yamyd sAnil • yn.n .. .': yy /..0 . , / . .. al ... : .. .. ,... , . ::•.•: . .. n t, —i' • • . : . . .v�/y , : rt : ... r .` :.l .>�.. , . . . . . , „ . it. .: . r - ,0A..(f., , W- sn' . . t ,p�: ... . . .. r, y,: e% • V9f.:i]Agi:.!.',•; - .... I". a n r .t:,.„.8.ft.Ag.T;:i:!;;EZ;ii:.ii.;:ii..;.i]i]aD;;E44Mi.gl.M..inilnigtPU:i .,!i:iREi. ;::R;:!P;:g.:.....::]: ;,,.;.:.,;14.;]c:irOk--•,e,:-:,--,:pg,-.1?0AZPVNY11,4'„,,,i,'2,,if,'-,,, •.:4, -' 1::: y, r�< �� r is ,: - /� ..... , 4: rWi h �'S•/•- �C . .. .. .... ... ..- ... > r. ♦ "cal. -.� :.' ., . ':- ., }-x'.t.,. ..r,...r. .-. _...e..,"..-e 4..__,z"+ ';. � L.a'r.},..-.-r ,x`:,y_ ,'tat 5 •_l-Y�'Z S--..,.r aye_..c..^•.=.w.-•,`. ,-, _'k'^`.x-.r..:...�„._ ,.�._,.eac,_ �, ,.[,.r,,�•. s.-_:+ -u.c-,t..•.a w.:•..,-:,'+-y;•„_•',r.�„-'t.,^-'.t.a.... *`cis„i>x..,w:r.ri. ._.. . : C • �- `_'k•4..a - - �:. t..1 te Y ,-� r:- �- - - c. � !' C � ?' t '„ a`�, `4= � ' . �' _ � .-i't•_ `sn .. - ' x -c„:t.• , .. -, •:- ,. "^' - • ,I - - . . n p- , �4Y..�?-: i t � � �,:- � ,,.;1_ ,�sqfi"a''k 7 t��-±b �'.-rA-. +,a,[ T3--�„�,3�* .,rc"� r A,,;. r- c .- ♦- y .^_ L.„♦•,W r 3 t z,,F �•_4^��„l,v-.4 t. ¢r ,sr:,.n .o.,a�i-s :+:+ , �: -....= , ' -,. c *,:171..8 The Seattle Times Wednesday, December 12, 1984 *� Y", C ° confident his ordinance would censor so much. You can't regu- pas's theater has hurt the Des since that city was fighting a" blindly rely on evidence from-other . l ie sin stand up in court, late everything you don't like. Moines revitalization plan. relatively new battle. He admitted cities, it wasn't whether or not . ' ._ "I think it is a good decision," Maybe now Renton has learned Careful records have been kept his city was lucky to have the they had an adult business when T. '" • he said. "It gives us some very that. of allpublic hearings and the area opportunity to wait on the court's g PP Y they wrote the law." -, .-� es �®ns clear guidelines that I think we "I would assume now that Des zoned for adult businesses is appro- decisions before voting on its have met. This is a ve workable riate, he said. Much of Renton's ordinance. He also said Renton had not set rY Moines is going to back off," he Paside a "realistic" area for adult , __ decision," said. "I know I would. It's an open area zoned for adult businesses He had planed to present the He Gorham said somepast cases, was unusable, occupied byordinance to the citycouncil Jan, businesses. acres ond's area in- ; door for them to get their butt being P eludes 520 of useable land, PORNPORNincluding one in Seattle, allowed a kicked." businesses such as an oil tank 10 but has postponed the presenta- city to force a theater to move farm, garbage dump and sewage tion until sometime in March, `n ith its ordinance backed up by when new zoning ordinances were Gorham said he fully expects a treatment, Gorham said, givinghim a chance to digest the extensive hearings and studies, • Continued from H 1 A federal court battle with Pappas information. g Wallace said. The Renton decision passed, provided the theater owner PP Renton's attorney disagreed • new ,' was given sufficient notice. and he expects to win. with that assessment, saying, Several city attorneys disagree will not affect Redmond's ordi fora adult theater to move Dick Pappas, owner of the Des He explaned that Des Moines "Finding out their property is not with Warren's assessment that a nance. MIL- Moines Theater said Des Moines has been much more careful in the useable would really upset some of city can't regulate adult businesses Some cities' ordinances, such :;,Des• Moines attorney, James would be foolish to pursue their drafting of its ordinance than the people who own valuable prop- until it has them. as those in Kirkland and North GO-than, however, disagrees with ordinance, promising them a Renton was. He said they were erty in that area." Redmond's attorney John Wal- Bend, may not be threatened by Warren's •interpretation of the lengthly and costly court battle. certain to show appropriate rea Gorham said Renton can't be lace said,"I think it was their the Renton decision because the ! ^ court'- decision. He said, if any- "I would say it's all over," sons for regulating adult business- blamed for what some people are motive that was suspect, so the attorneys there took a different thing;..fhe decision made him more Pappas said . "You can only es, claiming the presence of Pap- consdering sloppy law making court would not let them just tack in regulating adult businesses. E K ,.., .sue,', [d` ' ='€.. C-.r y , - .. -.g,, n w - „ .,_8 ,• . ., , -, . s. ',K`+.. 4 �:t� '^3+ , ,, ..P it 1, , -.- :1. ��.4 -t. Xc ,:< x- .. �.#::,�, .� .K, ,, .w. ^a. ..4.7 tr,.. .r. - 'w ,R a t;.,, +_� ,. 4 +'t,-`' -` .,c_'^ _ A. ':a:r, :i- �a"t' ' „„�:7'_. ,t.: x- ,.F• „ ; ..-;, :�--. _, -.. -.:. _:'w.� - '�. -;; ., i. y <...- f; ..,� ., '+N "ry - ..� - �i =1: -`5 • _ .a,, ,a••t ^;C'a� '€+�a ''hit`,. .�, . . _ , •Ss�' "C t ,;"� . -_:��. -.- ..,J �` ;,�x� f., '�"r t ;�' - -d 'xv^L d -1 - �7.,: t'- r;r.�;s'�'.,,.. ':�''.} �..s' .,�ir a�" ,... � .. w r ��_ �_ •��r �", A �, Y�`E�' _. rt^��+ 5• - ,"'�¢'r;r," r�s. 4�'..: �-r s,-« >��' k,. Y-;ai" .. -. . :..r 'K •,- n' . .. ., ... _._..: 4 -•+... -, i - i - Y -'? s.+i _ ,s.- .i,,. c�1';t. •"-`9:,: i�c^?',y .r^ +.t • . , a '-'1. �'. - , -.. f�,� �' ,�- '�' �� '" '3 � � �. -,,x,,,. ;,; ''�i'•- r7K iF, , - � ,-_i-•'� ) s4" a7.,: C .3#�', �p' .,W.,"�'_, `�1 "Y. -.�'c� �.1'.�� $ r.'�l' 1 jn i �. �^ . 34 . � ;x ;'��"ST '4 �' ..',,,. FJ? ",'�,�-'°'Fs '`�`.'Saw�.''l' L5 ^ ,�;o- _r• ::`� ^-'� •�� 'i.r@�� �.' _yr i ' 1 ''''' 4 r.r , r i ,t-e., 4 -ab,�,^ f ,it .+x ,•7 , is — !t" Y _ � .�Ft ® .3•� ,} �i �'�y` ,a,y�yF F.: 'A�i` .. ��.� ,K.hh 1:. ,�. +�,� �+�, 2 �� Y S �'• £ `• - {'•, !:, 'c'r �,z , ' S�`f Y`• .{� -- ��.t'k ,K,• y,l: ;i 72 f,,,,•. "Y",V „¢E ,- _ �rl- >V� ,t: ,,y,- - •- t'+t :-,^,: :�_ ;:,E t, ..yS`�t,.ii ,� � �i +W,{ ,�: .7�`3°.' u ,4 '�`..�i.�i{"M, ,-_`4,t-5� .,�'x� i � \-'°`s.-.•� -r r .- r , �FE.. Y.,^ r`., 'r+ '4,-�4".•' 4 ''iP o,2.'g'c e -. :s ' 'az%> •§.� •3�t"•+P•t "-z nF s A... � .�,. ,- _ .- � -- �..... .,.t�. ... .. ,.tr. _- c .�, `Aa+. . - - vt:,.,psi �„tiwv r .. r , w,-_.r . �. ,-..- .wy.F -,y�"'. „ i 4$� t ..,, .w '..... •s u.. ,'ij Y,. "� • ''. f'Y` IL :Rr: n S �`�„ h'1..� • 3- T ^ 'Ff. `3 , "%'rr ,.?:. ,aw•. .i,.7RvY�C�'. .,.a• by �f� . =• � .�t' ' .:ie'. .� �6k-' xn !$r. .}. _ „ , Y _ . , erg.. _E. 4 Y- , "$ '',s wy;, ca � •'r ,,,- s - `''�_-21 # - _ - r ;, 5 + , ♦. , k'_,_,_€"f'.;5,. iwvr ..._ .- ' .• .T;k.,. v.`a�.._far°"wF� ,;(*-"1" , a w .uc,,,so.' s h w Q w 'Y�s ^a A Y't . t ' '-.Y.. ' 13- ... . r,;'' ' i'Yp_,': ,i . q ,,.,-. u ^ -t Jr f _,, .� .t �:- ,,,.1-u,. ��gy, •:i' :7 " .,1P. t_, .�.�a.,,e. .,Sv�' a.a. .._.i•.-, t.:ii'A',c. 'w;;..e�,§-...^''X-: �. •..+.,e+,�i:2c,, r'�Ei ^'uy,i..,'Plf Zg 7.2�:•..{..sT:�s... ,-t • "'S � #Srl' r� ,w'a - �- .;1 j a ra n -tea , ice"' .. ... ... ... .. , • 1 Forbes' offe4 . now in the lap TeddrCI C. �. — -� of City Council -__ By JIM McNETT , y Forbes Staff Reporter The city attorney said it may take 'Renton City Attorney Larry Warren is - (Continued from page Al) as many as four weekly executive less than excited about Roger Forbes' sion didn't define our options very sessions with city councilmembers offer to stop showing X-rated films at the w well." • • before it is decided whether to Renton Theater for a$250,000 settlement j '.a The future costs of the case hinge appeal the case, wait for a new from the city. `-0 upon what U.S.District Court Jude hearingwith.Judge McGovern or "He's made settlement offers to us i '4 ' g throughout the case and I'vepassed them Walter McGovern decides to do with _accept Forbes'settlement offer. g , ;_ the decision that,was returned to all'along,to the'City Council," Warren , :- him from the circuit court of appe-- said Thursday. "We can't do anything i -<- als Warren said. " ' until(the council members)decide what .,:' i;y-- "If we only have arguments to we wish to do." • '- ' present it will only take us-a few Forbes'attorney,Jack Burns,announc- hours to prepare, I presume," he ed Wednesday that the city had been - ' .. said. "But if more evidence is given the option of settling its lawsuit ;;:. needed it would be a mini-trial." with his client for $250,000 or face the =, possibility.of paying more in attorney t- - fees and damages later. , The city has been attempting to en- y , . force its 1981 zoning law that forbids , - adult theaters within 1,000 feet of homes, i churches,schools or parks.The case has _Y y gone through numerous hearing's and appeals, until a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judge in San Francisco 'last' month overturned the law on the ground that its motive was.too vague. Burns made his latest settlement offer following the circuit court's decision,-,' reasoning the payment would accomplish ' the city's ultimate goal of banning por • - nographic films from the downtown theater. - ' Renton Finance Director Mike Mul- cahy said the city has'pent approximate- , ly$300,000 on the case to this point.That amount includes witness and attorney fees, special trial exhibits, court costs . and other charges,he said. 1 . Costs have slowed since last summer, Mulcahy said, .when Superior Court Judge Nancy Holman's decision that some of Forbes'films were obscene was appealed. -. :! "It(spending)has been relatively quiet waiting on the appeal,"he said. Mulcahy said the litigation costs are"a' direct reflection of the time and effort Larry's office puts into the case."Warren ' is..paid on an hourly basis to handle outside litigation such as the Forbes case,.' while receiving a regular monthly retain- er to perform more routine work for the . city, such as reviewing ordinances and contract's,Mulcahy said. Warren said it is unclear whether to heed Burns' warnings that the,city will . face higher and higher costs as it pursues its case against Forbes. City officials have several options open to them,each s with a different cost attached. "The only appeal option we have left is the(U.S.)Supreme Court,"Warren said. ', "I've never appeared before the Supreme Court to argue a case; so I'm not sure ,what the full costs are.It's really murky ' now, because the (circuit) court's deci (See FORBES,page A3) ' Renton City Council 12/3/84 Page three Public Hearing 1985 Budget 1985 Budget Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Reed, $8,000 be placed in and Federal Legislative budget for publication of quarterly City Reports Revenue Sharing in conjunction with Park Department program schedules. Motion Funds cont. failed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, MATTER OF QUARTERLY CITY REPORT BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Continued Councilman Trimm opposed increase in water and sewer rates, decrease in garbage rates, and the utilization of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds for purposes of salaries. Upon inquiry, Finance Director Mulcahy advised inclusion of a mail stuffing machine in Finance Department budget. Councilman Stredicke indicated that although the budget was one of the best ever provided by the Administration, he would oppose its adoption due to salaries proposed for top level positions. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE 1985 BUDGET AS AMENDED INCLUDING REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. CARRIED. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: HUGHES, KEOLKER, REED, MATHEWS, CLYMER. 2 NAYS: STREDICKE, TRIMM. CARRIED. (Total amount Budget Adopted of budget including expenditures and receipts: $53,005.316.) Continued Mayor Shinpoch indicated the new budget includes funding for six new firefighter positions which will enable reinstatement of the aid car in the Renton Highlands. Also reflected is a $800,000 return to Renton citizens resulting from utility tax reductions. Councilman Reed cited a problem encountered by Council committees when discussing a matter proposed for public hearing. The Committee feels constrained in making a recommendation prior to the hearing. Mayor Shinpoch explained Committee members are entitled to express an opinion on matters reviewed by the Committee, and are entitled to reserve the right to support funding of plans, etc. during budget review. Continued Councilman Clymer spoke in favor of employees' wages, noting the community is better served by employees who take pride in jobs and provide good service, rather than by dissatisfied employees whose morale is affected by wage cuts and may not provide service of the same standard. AUDIENCE COMMENT Chuck Slothower, 517 South 17th, Co-Chairman of Citizens for Playtime Court a Quality Community, asked for information regarding the Case City' s next step in the Playtime lawsuit in view of recent decision by Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. He noted high level of support still exists in the community to prohibit adult movies in the location of Mr. Forbes' theater. Mayor Shinpoch advised the the Ninth Circuit Court has remanded the matter back to Judge McGovern, and Council will be discussing the subject litigation privately in executive session this date. Centron Corp. Ray Gervais, 506 Windsor Place NE, referenced Hearing Examiner SA-099-84 decision on Centron Corporation request for site approval to Roadway allow 264 apartment units on an 8.4 acre site near Edmonds Configuration Avenue NE and NE 4th Street (File No. SA-099-84) . He noted the proposal specifies extension of Edmonds Avenue NE from NE 3rd to NE 4th Street, and questioned whether the City plans any traffic revisions to prevent speeding (noting high vehicle speeds observed on Edmonds Avenue NE in the past) . Mr. Gervais suggested changing the roadway configuration to exit on NE 4th further west. City Attorney Warren advised conformance to site plan approved by Examiner is required unless the matter is appealed within specified period (12/5/84) , and Mr. Gervais, as a party of record, would be notified if an appeal is filed by the developer to the City Council . Mr. Gervais concluded by commending the City for the fine service provided by the Fire and Police Departments. Traffic Signals Larry Vickers, 13419 SE 125th Street, owner of property at 302-304 Wells Avenue N. , complained of unsynchronized traffic signals throughout the City, and reported traffic moves faster and smoother during power outages when signals are inoperable. He cited problems with new traffic revision at intersection of N. 3rd Street and Sunset Boulevard NE with traffic backing up in center lane since left turn lane Renton City Council 12/3/84 Page four Audience Comment continued Traffic Signals for westbound traffic turning south is restricted to freeway cont. erLrance. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to review the matter with Traffic Engineering Department. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Shane Street City Clerk submitted street vacation request by Dan Shane Vacation (RAMAC, Inc.) for portion of Maplewood Place (24th Avenue SE) and 5th Avenue East adjacent to SR-169 and Riviera Apartments; Public Works Department has verified signature on petition as representing 100% ownership. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing for 1/21/85; and to Board of Public Works for recommendation. Bid Opening - City Clerk reported bid opening 11/21/84 for South 2nd Street S. 2nd St./ and Burnett Avenue S. Signalization and Channelization Project; Burnett Signal four bids received; Engineer' s estimate: $44,773.50. Refer to Transportation Committee. (See Old Business, page 5.) Municipal City Attorney recommended increased compensation for Pro Tem Court Judges in Renton Municipal Court and reconstitution of Municipal Court under current laws. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. New Police Police Department recommended adoption of ordinances reflecting Laws new laws adopted in 1984 by State Legislature pertaining to custodial interference, computer trespass, two-way left turn lanes, and pawn brokers. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Renton Aviation Public Works/Airport Department requested review of Renton Leases LAG 08-79 Aviation Leases, LAG 08-79 and LAG 007-82, for assumption by LAG 007-82 Airmaster, Inc. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. (Airmaster, Inc.) (See later action under Old Business.) 1984 Asphalt Public Works Department submitted CAG 047-84, 1984 Asphalt Resurfacing Resurfacing Phase I Program; and requested approval of the Phase I Program project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement CAG 047-84 of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount to contractor, Watson Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. , if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Apron C at Public Works Department requested assignment of Apron C Renton Airport sublease from Aerodyne Corporation to Benair Aviation, Inc. Reassigned Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Adopted CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Finance Director Michael Mulcahy LID 323 Bond recommending acceptance of the low bid submitted by Richards, Financing Merrill & Peterson, Inc. in the amount of 9.9913% to provide financing for Local Improvement District 323 bonds. LID 323 was formed to reconstruct and widen SW 43rd Street from East Valley to West Valley Road, and the project included installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, street lights. sanitary sewers, bike bath, improved railroad crossing, paving, and all other necessary appurtenances. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (See later action, page 6 . Reappointment Letter from Mayor Shinpoch was read reappointing Fred J. of Land Use Kaufman as Land Use Hearing Examiner for a period of two Hearing Examiner years commencing January 31 , 1985. Mr. Kaufman brings essential qualities to the job: unquestioned integrity and superb professional credentials. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Due to expansion of the Land Use Hearing Examiner' s duties to include matters not related to land use, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, MATTER OF POSITION TITLE AND ORDINANCE RELATED TO DUTIES OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. _ _ _ _ _ . Y I Dole wins ,, . ,, . .... . . ,F . - , r £ Senate bid; ,.f pp fi ' riii t... 1 k no whip job _ , Ex F. ., _ ., for Gorton ` ,v ., ____ e ar.e. TALK Compiled from AP reports • N — z ;� _ _. Dole,ASwisecra�king chairmananrman eof `: _ NIGH hepowerful Senate Finance , 1 Committee and a likely 1988 presi- . ° - • - f dential aspirant, defeated four t *�- ,' rivals on Wednesday in the hotly -10411141. alr.x' ' contested . battle to succeed • ,ti0"' Howard Baker Jr. as Senate ma- or jority leader. 4 Meanwhile, Sen. Slade Gorton, t .; I R-Wash., failed in his bid to be- come Senate majority whip as he <` lost a 31-22 Republican Caucus ` 4 y. -`.1 vote to Sen. Alan Simpson of Wyo 4 n '-. ming. Dole, a 61-year-old Kansan, was ', r� elected 28-25 over his closest com- , , ,„,„:" ... ,.,....,. ,,_ ...,,,To,7t':' - ' ,,�., i _ - petitor, Ted Stevens of Alaska, on ""`""`"`` ` '"'""' the fourth secret ballot in a caucus ' ' `` of all 53 GOP senators who will _ ., _,...__ serve in the upcoming 99th Con- ... gress. t" The outcome touched off a chain reaction among key Senate com- mittee chairmanships, catapult- , , . N. ,-- - ing Bob Packwood, a frequent - ad- /. ministration critic, into the chair- 111 manship of the Finance Committee. As leader, Dole is banned by Senate rules from heading any panels. Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana will become chairman of the For- Jim Hallas/Journal-American eign Relations Committee, while .restrict porn theaters just because it doesn't like what they show. -Be/%ilu L' 'us'trna/-4m et,' th arch-conservative Jesse Helms of i/-.z9- (4 North Carolina will stay on as l- )s e s to porn theater in court chairman foofllowing the Senateboth fouAgr-hour, rs tune Committee, both senators confirmed following the four-hour, closed-door caucus. District Court in Seattle for trial, Renton's city attorney,in reaction Forbes, who resides in Hawaii, A beaming Dole emerged from where Fletcher said Renton offi- to the decision. "It's become a Ca- was traveling by plane to Seattle the meeting with Baker, who did cials must prove that the purpose reer for me—just this one case." Wednesday and was not available not seek re-election to the Senate of their law was to serve some im- Warren said he would be meet- for comment. this year,and told a jammed news portant city interest unrelated to ing with Mayor Barbara Shinpoch "We're pleased with the deci- conference he would work his har- suppressing free expression. and the City Council Monday night sion and we think it vindicates the dest to shepherd President Rea- to discuss whether to appeal the position we've taken from the out- gan's second-term initiatives RENTON'S ORDINANCE re- appeals court decision or let the set," said Jack Burns, a Bellevue through the GOP-controlled cham- stricts adult theaters from locat- case return to U.S.District Court. attorney who represents Forbes' ben. ing within 1,000 feet of any homes, "You'd have to say this is some- company,Playtime Theaters Inc. The Republicans control the churches or parks and a mile from what of a setback," he said. "We p y Senate by a 53-47 margin. schools. had complete victory before Burns said not only was the ordi- Gorton said Tuesday that he de- "Adult" theaters were defined now they tell us we have to go to nance unconstitutional, but it was cided to seek the whip position be- as those emphasizing films show- trial." being used by Renton officials to cause"it puts the senator from the ing specified types of sexual activ- But he said the city is not con run Forbes'theater out of town. state of Washington in a position to its Nit the nrrlin,nnP did not cQo .Pllin i APf'at "Wcw'rn cirrknlv "I think that even if the court be heard by the administration The meeting will be held at 7:30 together,she said. p.m.at the Anderson School Gym, Other cities have passed strict , .,t t t, 18603 Bothell Way N.E. , ordinances that have successfully t ;' ;, ' \ ,:'- , Molly Boll, a * group member,. kept adult establishments away, g, said .the Planning Commission she said. ` `* recommendation to restrict video - + '= . "..`� '. A. " ' $, and bookstores, massage parlors BOLL SAID the group would /°,, ' S ,: t and bathhouses by keeping them fight adult businesses and'pornog= ` •' ` "- . , s in a small section in town actually raphy by boycotting stores that • , .k,,, °, y if" _ J. leaves the door open for adult bu- sell pornography'and by conduct- ,', :'F ; . ! pit• Ni. • sinesses to come to Bothell. Mg a letter-?writing campaign to" _ r Two weeks ago, the city Plan- state and local officials urging �•,A. _Wing Commission approved a set of them to adopt anti-pornography 1 zoning code amendments designed laws. ,,xb .' •,, ,l is ,;< to discourage adult entertainment She also said the group hopes to • K , ' x $' business operators from locating drum up community support in its { ° " �` in the city. It required them to fight against pornography. meet a lengthy list of require- "I think_a lot can be done if you Development is forcing 93-year-old Dudley Carter to ments before obtaining a business can get the;population off their • " license. couches and away from their TVs into an auditorium and thinking," A ' • ALTHOUGH theretaren't any Boll a 01 ,, . e at adult entertainment businesses in The group was formed by sever- " Bothell now, current zoning codes al.vocal residents who attended • 1 would allow such businesses to lo- the Planning Commission's delib- • cate in any commercial area in the erations on;adult entertainment By Doug Margeson since. But city. The City.Council is expected businesses.The commission spent • Journal-American Staff Writer . • Carter • to begin its discussion of the pro- four months and held seven heated Sculptor Dudley Carter's problems finding make posals in a study session on Jan. public hearings on the subject. a new home for his work maybe solved. verge I Carter,displaced when the land he has lived A N . Renton loses... and worked on for 37 years was sold for a busi- concer i ness park, will move to British Columbia for ternati • —Continued from Page One perse sex theaters around the city, the winter. The King County Public Works have n uphold freedom of speech,"Burns and the Seattle ordinance was Department has found a temporary storage studio • said. meant to concentrate them;in one area near Marymoor Park for his monumen- But The Renton Theater,located at area. f tal wood carvings. Works Renton officials have defended And plans are under way to possibly make Carter 507 S. Third St., sparked the legal, their-ordinance by saying it would Carter.an "artist_in residence" at the park a numl battle.It is the only one in Forbes' protect parks, schools, churches when he returns. areas i chain of X-rated theaters that he and.residential areas from ad- Carter,93,bought the four-acre site in Red- plan t, continues to operate, according to Burns verse effects of adult theaters.' mond in 1947 and built a house and studio on it. move continues to show They cited the experience of De- The studio is a replica of a Haida Indian long- cordin The theater w X-rate A King County S troit and Seattle as evidence that house. He sold the.land to the Edward J. De- then w adult theater's cause blight: Bartolo Co. in 1978, which sold it to the Cam- " reside] perior Court judge ruled in June But Judge]Fletcher said those peau Corp of Calgary,Alberta,in 1981.Carter - Thai that the theater could continue to reasons were merely "conclu- ', has been leasing the land from Campeau ever officia operate until the appeal was de- cided. " sory" and that Rentonen had to Burns hinted that the city, of text"justify y tons pfobl I thems,cnot ' Renton may not continue to chal- lenge-Forbes. Seattle's or Detroit's problems." . "Many of the stated reasons for Bellevue wetlan the ordinance were no more than IF ANOTHER trial is held, he expressions of dislike for the sub- said, it may be just to decide the. ject matter,';.she said. "...Renton By Mike Gowrylow take the loss?" amount of damages and legal fees has not shown that it was not mo- Journal-American Staff Writer • Forbes'company is owed. - ' tivated by a desire to suppress Opponents turned out in force ALTHOUGH cit' Forbes, he said, has requested speech based on its content." Warren differential compensation for the time the the- Wednesday to protest a Bellevue p Forbes liought the.Renton The- broad policies and Planning Commission proposal to ater was closed, as well as attor- ater in. 1982, showing general-in- limit development in wetlands and tailed, implementi ney's fees and' money lost in the terest films. for a year before on steep slopes. that would have to operation of another theater switching to the more financially "I'll and stage, the crc across the street. lucrative X-rated movies. tell you one thing. You're mood for either. The U.S.Supreme Court has up- ' A federal court judge ruled last going to see a bunch of lawsuits The proposal drev held a Detroit law restricting sex- year that the ordinance was con- coming out because people aren't support from the Le oriented theaters, and a similar stitutional. But Forbes appealed, going to stand for it, declared Voters and others, law in Seattle was upheld by the contending the rule violated his. Mark White, who has owned 30 audience consisted Washington Supreme Court. But First Amendment,rights of free acres in the Mercer Slough for 40 White,or developer the appeals court said the Renton _speech. _ years. ulators who.had r ordinance was different. Forbes once had an empire of 10 Most of'the approximately 125 lands with the pros' Though- the Renton measure adult theaters located around the people in the audience shared " . ingthemforcomme does not ban adult theaters,a sub- state, but over the past year, sold- White's concern that he won't be . day.. stantial part of the land left avail- some and leased out others. ' able to develop most of his land The city is propos able for the theaters is already oc- One theater, the Cine-Mond in . should the City Council eventually to preserve Bellew cupied by businesses, Judge Redmond, was closed July 31. , adopt the so-called"natural deter- natural drainage ai Fletcher said hi her opinion. Forbes said the theater was losing minants"policy. vent problems froi In contrast,she said,the Detroit' money and sold it to a Redmond "Who's going to pay me for velopment on steep ._ ordinance was intended to.dis- ." accountine firm. ' . that?"White asked. "Do T have to But Don Lewisnn , , -,,,,,,p., Fre;,-,:. :!---.:-,„:%. . , 4 -, But not to worry; ivasn just e ,''''l -^1-- `dttitit" 1.1 - -- :' - :XY - ' 1.-•>",41i. '''': ,-- 'Irir'''-' ' .:x.1.-.,-,.-- .--. Husband taught _ . ..,-,t . '-; ; there'll be more .., . , Knows what ,: ,, - , „,- , ,-. --7-' .ft .` widow how to ..,.i , -.. ..,,, ,- ,., .., ,- ;::.5 ,,,:,, 4.'''.„ , , ..., „ ' chances to give; A3 it takes; B1 .. - --- - ;, - ,- .- • ---Ii.,„--,',1-1 reacn OW hii5 . - .„,„„ x_„- '' ,w1,-,„-„,,L4v.,--V:'-,,..i.4-,--,„, -. '=Z2.,k-Z-':. r''.-.-,;,' ',.: .•-'-';',,,,. --. '*. '',,,- ,---; ,, -.,--?..44-Z..,..-.1r- , _. _. _ ,_ ,,,..,_ ,• , _ ,..: ___. ,. . ... ,,_ ,_ - .,..-,t .„,,,,, ..•,.' i ',.....,.. -..,,,,- , ;.,,_-_-_, , ..-- , , „... '___.,"z_....„,...„::„A„:„._,_-.„-,..,,,%,_:„:..";,-,,,,',.!'g;:,'"->-,.. `,",:.,,,J , ;L,....„.,,,..7„_ ,„.,..-, „v , '„,,__, _, , , ‹ • _ ' • 6 ..qz --p:,. - . , • ...v.. >v..-V --A.., , ,,f`t:,:•: . -„.- -.- -,; - L— - ' . id. , ., ..,,... • • ..,..,k ',I.,- ''':47'' - ..::',t` 'At! ' 64"-;-...: ......:;•:,,'ilr. '' .`r .t --. 1.. li.„;:" ,'..-.`, 127;“ - . -,:;::- .41 .-,...i,,,,,.. ,,,,, 4tr._,.' Teo% ',-,-.4: -, ',.. '...,-...,'--,3, - ,' - .'.--.t,z 4,-.z.:.-- , ,k- ., •-,,' --A *L ,Vg-(`P -C,...' '; '''. r -."," •*-‘'3... ''''.li ,i. . ; 4...L.'', "`4,6, ;.1, Cgi rle. i* -...= 'Nv;...7., •...-- '',.?..'—..n... '-'. ;-• --...i2* ..i..."1,, ..2.4 '4;t4' .."-z--.. i'vz, ',.=%-- '....',. .t.P"' -;-7- -,15q.' . 4' ',:.4 Z,'-- '''": - -.; ...." ...,;7:1 ='.1r:,4 '.''' . , ,._ ',-,''''• '-,.., .'",-. %,'..4,5., ,,..4. ..F. •,tis- --- --,, ,.....- ••,-,7: ..,,,,,, •-„.., -.-:--,..::-.:: ..„..,,,t _•-•• ,... -,..,-,. - .,„. , ,..7 ,_-:: (c)Copyright 1984 4:4:r1r, Volume 60, No. 293 ' Thursday, December 6, 1984 Serving Renton and Tukwila, Washington 250 , -', . , ,- - ,;--,-7;:•-_<-17-'4.5-4,,:ir,1-.--:',.';'-i- •-•.'rf--.- i,:-..77,.•-k--17.-•.Xiz.;;:15- 4.3f-A49,Iii- '14Z *;:---:'7-i-kl-".-2';' '"•..:-.. -...-•,?•)-r••-, z,--4.6'. --iv;=4-'',7•4:.-i-te.-1-;•-$--tz-7 ,-f.:,--.- -,...-:•,:;,,:tzt, ,,t".z.:4:,:`,11:.-,'",.-A-= •'...---- -4- -;,-------4--- - ------,--------,----•-,-..• ••-—----41- - - • „..t..,.--41,-, = ,.•....t--,,,,--.......::;---,cr..,,.....-4,....,_t '-‘..:,..,:,.;_.:--,,,44,,,...7.,---.--'`-',.7.,.t...."-.wi--,:k- 1.-t-..,w--,4 , . - ` • ....... ,.., . .. . . . .... ....0 ' 4.- .. . z- -.., ., .;.:- ..„--, -... .- .,. ...; „ ,, ,...-...„. ; ,:- • ; -", :"..'„ w • . .. 111) "?,,,,,. *...'' .,..• -, On) ., . ... . '3%,,- ;.. ..,,.... ., ,....„ . „. • By JAN HINMAN . ,..., . '-, ' be better to spend that money now rather In reply, Burns said Wednesday,-"I showing general-audience films, or the and JIM McNETT than to risk spending more in legal fees think deep down he knows they took a theater might revert to former owner • • . 'Bob McRae,who would likely show films Staff Reporters and possible damages to my client" shellacking." . . ...-- -- ..„.. •:,..,5 . , 10- :- ....* _ . ',,,- :', _ , shr4 - -r-d in -.-- 1 , The attorney for Renton X-rated thea- The offer comes on the heels of a 9th In an executive session following Mon- for general audiences ter owner Roger Forbes Wednesday said - .Circuit Court of Appeals ruling last week day's City Council meeting, Warren ad- But if the city will not agree to pay , his client will stop showing pornographic- that struck down Renton's 1981 zoning vised the council members of the four attorney fees,Burns said,"We will press 4 :: .7 i ' .7A,c ''' .....„ iffi SM--w - -.. t,. - films if the city of Renton agrees to pay law restricting adult theaters to certain basic options they could pursue to resol- forward with our claim for damages and $250000 in an out-of-court settlement. areas. The case was returned to U.S. ye the case in light of the appeals court attorney fees." ._ ."Roger is willing to close the Renton District Court in Seattle for trial. ruling. Those options are: Appeal from He estimates those could be$350,000 to B HOPAL,India--Bhopal struggled Wednes- Theater today if they will just pay him the The Renton ordinance forbids adult the-9th Circuit Court of Appeals to the $400,000.Damages would be based on the o keep up with the disposal of bodies of the attorney fees"attorney Jack Burns said. theaters within 1,000 feet of any homes, U.S.Supreme Court;ask fora reconsider- "loss of cash flow" from the theater ,people reported killed by a pesticide gas The offer was• relayed Wednesday to churches, schools or parks. ation of the case by the appeals court;go during the year Forbes showed general ..•.„,,A.But authorities feared the decomposing Renton City Attorney Larry Warren,he Renton city officials must now prove along with the appeals court's decision release films, he said, adding Forbes said corpses of humans and animals would cause an . ,, , that the motive of their law is to serve and wait for a new hearing before U.S. "would have lost less money" showing . epidemic of disease in the stricken area. City officials referred all questions some vital city interest unrelated to District Court Judge Walter McGovern; adult films. Injured wandered the streets,inany of them regarding the Forbes case to Warren, suppressing free expression, or attempt to settle the case out of court. Burns pointed out that the attorney blinded by the chemical that spread over their who could not be reached for comment - Warren said earlier the appeals court's Warren subsequently said he "could fees will continue to escalate if the city - city y slept Monday morning.An estimated Wednesday. decision robbed the city of a victory but not second guess the council" to deter- chooses to continue the fight.He also said 50,01 re been treated in hospitals overflow- „ . It just seems to me that given the failed to prove that the zoning law was mine which course of action the individu- he may claim some damages for finding it ing(............ie suffering: amount of mone the already have wrong.He said the grounds for requiring al members would chose. necessary to return the Roxy Theater— y y An Indian government official called on Union involved and that their intent is to close that a proper motive be proved had not If the city agrees to pay the settlement, which'he purchased at the same time as ,Carbide,builder of the pesticide plant where the the theater down,"Burns said,"it might been established. Burns said, Forbes would, either begin the Renton Theater—to McRae. leak occurred,to provide relief for the thousands . , • of victims"as it would have done had this r3 ' accident occurred in the United States." 2 The smoke of mass funeral pyres spread over -. ,, , i,.. , , z . •4 . -. ' • ` - ', -, -,-'Ptf-,,'-k:'. Greive plan the city.Gravediggers dug 15-foot trenches for --, { ., , . , - - - -:,--,-•;,- ,-,tt ,- ,,,, •,'-..,-e,•• . mass burials and reopen old plots to add bodies. - -. '' "It is a sin to bury two bodies in one grave but 40-'5.:t-itei, ' we must bury three and four and more together," ' .., - `-.r- •--g.- ...' to curo Strip said Abdul Karim."I pray Allah I never have to • -.. -' -,...•'''',, ' , t '''''''''''''I''',**,,' -' do this again."Details,A4. ,..,- . prostitution Reagan orders budget cutting , , __;,-- _ d' WASHINGTON—Declaring"we must get or,„,... \i'l N--. --- 1 '1 - ' • ' kevA" "0#,".P-- 4 ac ,,,,,):_ ;,,, = - , ' > ,`,..V.e,..; , control of federal spending,"President Reagan ordered his Cabinet on Wednesday to savp nppriv "-17,---qL--;71-:A.:,I /. '''' ' -:'• .-L' `) • • • P-I Staff' - prove that.a"compelling government ruled the Renton law unconstitution- home', church park or school.'It Seattle ordinance was -meant to h • and News Services.,- interest-uilrelated to-suppression-of •al.. defines "adult" theaters as those • concentrate them•in one area. speech•would be"served by the law.•. Warren 'said, Renton has three showing films portraying certain Renton officials; justified their ' • A Renton ordinance restricting • . " _. ' y types of explicit sexual activity. ordinance b s .X.-rated movie•theaters was"struck But. :Forbes'• . attorney, Jack, -options;Go backbefore U.S.-District y aying it"would protect ; • down yesterday by a federal appeals.: Burns, said`he didn't expect -,a trial" Court Judge- T. McGovern,.- The.Supreme Court has upheld a Parks,schools,churches,and residen- court. • • . .on that-issue 'because, he argued;' . who ;had ruled -.the .ordinance .was.. Detroit law restricting =sex-oriented tial."areas from adverse effects of , • -The 9th U.S.'.Circuit Court of. Renton already`had presented all its valid; ask for',reconsideration by the 'theaters;and a similar;law in Seattle: ,adult theaters. The' city cited the t Appeals ruled•in'San Francisco that• evidence. ' full appeals court (a three member. was upheld-by' the Washington Su experience of Detroit and Seattle as. panel .delivered yesterday's deci- - preme Court. But the appeals'court) evidence that adult theaters cause • the city cant limit the;theaters just', .Burns, :who-interpreted the-ap ;lion),or ask for.a,review-by the U.S. said the Renton ordinance was dif-' blight.-• because it objects to:the type,of peal's--court opinion as a finding that Supreme Court'. ' :_ ferent. ,'. ' But Fletcher said Renton had to films they show.: -the Renton:law•is unconstitutional, ;' • ' 1 ."justify its ordinance in the context The. court said Renton had not ' The,-ruling apparently has no • . • Though the.Renton measure does: , predicted the only future court hear= , : of Renton's problems, not Seattle's shown in its court battle with adult- in on the law will:dealwith Forbes', ',impact on the:Seattle law restricting , not ban adult theaters;a:substa> t�al or, Detroit's problems . Renton g' location of adult-movie •houses, but part.of the land leftavailable fo.r,,, e' movie theater owner Roger Forbes claim for darhages and attorney fees• fn has not shown that • it was not • ; that the law served any important from 'Renton. Forbes has shown • .Burns said it•could;hinder proposals theaters „ is already. •occupied';by motivated by a desire to suppress ; purpose other than to suppress free adult films'at the Renton'Theater'in to enact ordinances.similar to Ren- businesses, said the opinion written speech based on its content." ; speech. • the city's.downtown area since 1982, tote's 'in other cities. by Judge.Betty Fletcher"of Seattle.• Forbes, who once operated a - r The court sent the.caseto U.S. - The. Renton ordinance doesn't •She. said the Detroit ordinance -chain . of nine adult , theaters i District Courtin Seattle for a trial in Renton City Attorney Larry War- ban X rated movie theaters,:but it was. intended to-disperse.sex the stateyvide,has sold all but his Renton t which Renton officials would have to ren•insisted that•the court had not forbids them within 1,000 feet of any aters throughout the city, and the theater. - • tiu —fceord (4to4le/e- //-.19-1,/ CrUl tit UV i i-t1 II 111C I .1 IIIII Iii , t 1 1 W P ,. m f "adult" theaters as those emphasizing u • , - ,. By,Valley Newspapers films showing specified types of sexual ; � and The Associated Press activity, but does not,Say they must be ' 1 w. sop, ,;.. SAN FRANCISCO (AP) A law re- legally obscene. F '' stricting adult theaters in.Renton was The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a struck down Wednesday by a federal Detroit law restricting sex-oriented thee- �n • appeals court, which said a city can't ters, and a similar law in Seattle. was limit theaters just because it objects to upheld by the Washington Supreme G # 44 __ the movies shown there. Court. But the appeals court said the '.� The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Renton ordinance was different. >` �� �. . - issued an order that will have the effect Though the Renton measure dries not �t of blocking enforcement of the zoning ban adult theaters, a substantial part of ...,, ., �,�� µM ordinance,which was'passed in 1951. the land left available for the theaters is - _, ~ " The case was'returne;d to U.S.District already occupied by businesses,said the ..-• - !-"" " Court in Seattle for trial, where Renton opinion by Circuit Judge Betty Fletcher s. -- � 1- �-�---""" officials must prove that the purpose of of Seattle�-- their law was to serve some important In contrast she said the Detroit ordi ,r - 4"`- a - ----- —1 city interest unrelated-to suppressing nance was intended said, disperse sex t free expression. theaters around the city, and the Seattle '" `Y ----x'•'t`�° " a_. Jack Burns,attorney for theater owner_ ordinance was meant to concentrate _. Roger Forbes,said Wednesday afternoon them in one area. ..:u "" -- v he had not yet read the entire decision, g •,_r.-KK .a •a """� which has been pending since the case . Renton officials justified their ordi- ,•-•'°mm" a arguedin circuitnance bysaying it wouldprotect arks 1 ;•,,.. .,.- , was court last May. Y g parks, ..........wv-a.,-•�.. ..ouxw...a....w.,,.. .M G....,.wr,..,..•.�,•...a.w, "� �"e'A8"•..ws�`�"'. "We've schools, churches and residential areas �•. ,-.,.�.-•.. ��.. � -•--• ,;�„„,..�- �"`°" We ve been waiting quite a while for it,"Burns said.He added he was pleased from adverse affects of adult theaters.It -° with the outcome. cited the experience of Detroit and I "It seems to me what the decision is Seattle as evidence that adult theaters ..�' cause blight. saying is the ordinance is unconstitution- al,"Burns said. "The city failed to meet But Judge Fletcher said those reasons its burden of proof. The court reversed were merely "conclusory" and that Re- Judge (Walter T.) McGovern and re- nton had to "justify its ordinance in the manded it to him•for proceedings consis- context of Renton's problems, not Seat- tent with the(circuit)court's opinion." tle's or Detroit's problems." ' � ' Forbes recently moved to Hawaii and "Many of the stated reasons for the -- - could not be reached for comment. ordinance were no more than expres- � Renton City Attorney Larry Warrensubjectmatter," sions of dislike for the ' said the decision simply.means the city she said." . . . Renton has not shown that i - ' .. 6, will have to go back to district court and it was not motivated by a,desire to argue its motives for enacting the zoning- suppress speech based on its content." ` law. Pornographic films have been showing u "I can't say we're unhappy about the at Forbe's theater throughout the court decision at all," Warren'said. "The 9th battle. Last summer, when Forbe's was Circuit Court took away a victory from challenging the city zoning ordinance in KingCountySuperior Court,• � � us,but it didn't render us wrongeither.If P Judge Nan- h: ,,� e all we did wrong was fail to prove the cy Holman and a jury viewed 10 films at ='''' 11 the theater, eventually ruling four of ., # r motive issue we didn't do too badly. -,' r s a them obscene. Warren said a federal court decision ' s from Idaho used as a basis for the circuit Burns said his next legal step may be to , 7'; <•4 w s make an application,'; � .z� ��°��., court's latest ruling was made in 1983— PP •cation in federal court for k',- after attorneys for the city prepared and collection of attorney's fees, which Fie argued their case. estimated to be "in the area of a couple " "Motive wasn't,a legal issue then," he hundred thousand dollars or more." . •" said. Warren said Burns' plan to apply for R;i Y• attorney's fees is premature. The Renton ordinance forbids adult Rnn®r Fnncoc etanrle niiteirita hie R®rs+nn Thoe+nr File photo theaters within 1.000 feet of any homes, "They haven't won anything yet," he OF R� •► o THE CITY OF RENTON v Cr Co z POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 C MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9,0 (0. 0,94te0 SEP1E�OP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR March 15, 1984 TO: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor FROM: David R. Clemens, Policy Development Director I SUBJECT: City of Renton, et al. v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., et al. I was very pleased to review Mr. Warren's memorandum of March 12th on the Playtime Theatres' litigation. The comments with regard to participation of myself, Mike Parness, and Don Persson are obviously appropriate. However, it is very important to note that Assistant Planner Steve Munson from our office worked equally diligently in reviewing the films and providing background support in regard to this case and his participation should also be indicated. DRC:0555G:wr cc: Lawrence Warren Steve Munson r p RENTON CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RENTON Regular Meeting March 12, 1984 LIAR 1 b 1984 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers POLICY oFvci OPMct'T ncpT. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, Council President; EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. COUNCIL MEMBERS TRIMM, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER. CITY STAFF IN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; DAVID R. CLEMENS, Policy Development Director; LT. H. RAY CALDWELL , Police Department; CHIEF LEE WHEELER, Fire Department. PRESS Pat Jenkins, Renton Record-Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 5, 1984 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared March 11 through Girl Scout Week 17, 1984 as Girl Scout Week to celebrate the 72nd anniversary of the organization, which has had more than 46 million members since its inception in 1912. The proclamation was accepted by girls representing three different troops. Kathy Robison, troop leader, expressed appreciation for the proclamation and invited all former girl scouts to attend Girl Scout Recognition Night, March 14th, at Dimmitt Middle School . Samples of cookies now on sale were passed to everyone in attendance. AUDIENCE COMMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE Playtime Court REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS TO ALLOW FOR A SPECIAL COMMENDATION. Case Victory CARRIED. Referencing Judge Nancy Holman ' s recent ruling in favor of the City' s Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to adult City Attorney movie theaters, Councilman Stredicke applauded Mayor Shinpoch Warren Lauded and City Attorney Warren and his staff for the victory. Accolades were also extended to Administrative Assistant Parness, Policy Development Director Clemens, Captain Don Persson of the Police Department, Steve Munson of the Policy Development Department, and Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman for their individual contributions on the City ' s behalf. Mayor Shinpoch added her praise for the commitment of the community, the courage of the City Council , and the skill of the City Attorneys in pursuing the matter. Council President Hughes concurred in their comments and felt that any future challenge can be met in view of strong foundation already set. Councilwoman Keolker presented a congratulatory balloon bouquet to Mr. Warren, who shared credit with Assistant City Attorneys Kellogg and Barber as well as City Council members, Mayor Shinpoch and supportive Renton citizens. Continued Chuck Slothower, 517 S. 17th, representing Citizens for a Quality Community, thanked everyone involved in the case on behalf of a sizable segment of the community. AUDIENCE COMMENT Pat Houlbjerg, 14319 SE 100th Place, requested Council discussion Advance to of the Public Safety Committee Report regarding the Highlands Old Business aid car. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Public Safety indicating that a meeting had been held with interested Committee citizens regarding emergency aid service to the Highlands. Highlands Aid Chief Wheeler had described level of service since 1981 , and Car had indicated intent to request six additional firefighters/ EMT personnel in the 1985 budget to be considered by the Council in November, 1984. That additional personnel , if approved, would allow operation of an aid car in the Highlands from Station 12 on a full-time basis. / Renton City Council / 3/12/84 Page six New Business NEW BUSINESS Council President Hughes scheduled an Executive Session Executive Session immediately following Audience Comment portion of agenda to discuss pending litigation. Sunset Boulevard Councilman Stredicke questioned progress of Sunset Boulevard/ Roadway Project Maple Valley Highway roadway project. Councilman Clymer advised his understanding the project would be completed in May, 1984, with delays incurred due to removal of old concrete. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch distributed copies of a recap of 1984 Housing REPORT and Community Development Block Grant funds and Joint and Need Housing and Projects submitted by Ed Hayduk, Housing and Community Development Community Coordinator. Projects for which funds were requested are: Development Block Highlands Neighborhood Center, Phase I ; Housing Assistance Grant Funds Program; Neighborhood Cleanup Project; Highlands NSA Improvements, Phase I ; Senior Services Program; Planning & Management ; Renton Area Multi-Service Center Site Improvements; Highlands Rental Rehab Program (joint funding with Kent) . All funds were secured as requested with the exception of a reduction in the Housing Assistance Program which will result in elimination of one home repair loan. When funds become available 7/1/84, site improvements for both Renton Area Multi-Service Center (RAMSC) and the Highlands Neighborhood Center are expected to be underway in August. The Boeing Company has contributed $15,000 and Renton Rotary has contributed $8,000 to the RAMSC project for attainment of 950 or $378,223 of the total project budget. AUDIENCE COMMENT Carolyn Yahoudy, 1018 Pierce Court NE, congratulated the City Playtime Court on court victory in Playtime case and inquired regarding next Case step in judicial process. City Attorney Warren advised that a formal injunction will be issued by the court, then possibly an extemporaneous entry of formal findings of fact and judgment will be forthcoming. Executive Session MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. CARRIED. Time: 10:25 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all Time: 10:43 p.m. Council members were present. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk a-N-A OF I OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON 40 O U `$ POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 0 LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY A co' DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. 09gT�O SEPZ�o��P March 12, 1984 ZANETTA BARBER, FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A.FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF REN T ON TO: MAYOR BARBARA SHINPOCH, and MAR 1b1984 MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL POLICY DFVCI OPMMP?IT iIPPT. FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : City of Renton, et al . v. Playtime Theatres , Inc. , et al . I enclose to you a copy of the Memorandum Decision (without attachments) which was entered on March 9 , 1984 by Judge Nancy Ann Holman in the Superior Court litigation against Playtime Theatres , Inc . , et al . The attachments consist of the foLuls of jury verdicts and special interrogatories , together with the three ordinances in question. As we have indicated to you previously, this decision represents a complete victory for the position which the City of Renton has taken with respect to this illegal land use . We are extremely pleased with the independent research which Judge Holman has invested into this scholarly and well written opinion. At the crux of the decision is the court' s rejection of the "experts" which had been presented by the defense. Their theories of "scientific value" in order to avoid a finding of obscenity were totally rejected by the court. On the contrary, the court appears to have totally accepted the expert opinion testimony given by Dr. Ernest van den Haag, Professor of Jurisprudence and Public Policy at Fordham University in New York and Dr. Jack Faghin, a practicing psychiatrist here in Seattle. The testimony of these two witnesses .established the lack of scientific value of the films and the appeal to prurient interest . I believe that you will particularly appreciate the Court' s remarks with respect to the City' s responsibilities with regard to protection of "family-oriented areas" . It is ♦. y it Mayor Shinpoch and Members of City Council March 12, 1984 Page 2 clear that Judge Holman has understood and embraced the concept of zoning control of these types of deleterious land uses . It is interesting to note that she has moderated her insistance upon proof of obscenity in view of the jury' s finding that only four out of the ten films were obscene. Her theory in this regard always caused us great concern because it required extrapolation from the ten representative films to the entire group of film fare. Since a finding of obscenity is such a serious matter (since obscenity is illegal everywhere) we are doubtful that her theory was necessary or proper. In the face of the jury' s decision, she has apparently abandoned her requirement of proof of obscenity. Her decision more closely conforms to the requirements of our ordinance. Within the next few days we will be preparing detailed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as well as a permanent injunction which will be the final order in this case. As required by the court, we will be analyzing and presenting a Memorandum of Law to the court with respect to the scope of available remedies, including award of attorney' s fees and costs of litigation. In view of the holding by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that House Bill .626 is unconstitutional, we have significant doubt as to whether it will be possible to recover the costs of litigation in this matter. However, our final recommendation to you with regard to this cause of action must abide further research. I' am very proud of this decision. Likewise, we are proud of the members of the City staff who contributed so much to the preparation of our case in the trial court. I would especially want to note the contributions of David Clemens , Mike Parness and Don Persson with respect to the reviewing and statistical analysis of the films. The court found this evidence to be high persuasive as to the content of all of the films. L1ikewise, I am very pleased with the restraint which has been shown by the members of the City Council and the administration with respect to public comment on this matter. It might have been easy to make a political issue out of this litigation. . I Mayor Shinpoch and Members ' of City Council March 12, 1984 Page 3 1 In many other cities final decisions in such cases have been marred by public statements which later appear to show a prejudice against such land uses. However, we have always drawn strength from the knowledge that we had the solid support of the City Council in this matter. Please be aware that our Federal Court litigation against Playtime Theatres is still pending on appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The final brief will be submitted within the next few weeks. Then the matter will be set for oral argument. We are hopeful that Judge McGovern' s decision that the ordinance is constitutional will be affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court. Ver truly yours, Lawrence J. Warren LJW:bjm Enc. c'c: David Clemens Mike Parness Donald Persson I2 • 2 3 4 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 6 CITY OF RENTON, a municipal ) corporation, et. al. , ) 7 ) Plaintiffs, ) 8 ) NO. 82-2-02344-2 vs . ) 9 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION • PLAYTIME THEATRES, INC. , a ) 10 Washington corporation, ) et al. , ) 11 ) Defendants . ) 12 s) 13 14 I . PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF CASE . 15 The Municipality of Renton in this cause seeks to enforce its 16 ordinance as enacted and amended to abate as a nuisance, per se, 17 the exhibition of certain sexually explicit films by defendant 18 corporation in a theatre, located at 507 South Third Street, 19 Renton, Washington. The defendants also sought to have Renton 20 enjoined from enforcement of its ordinance and have the same 21 declared unconstitutional in a U .S. Federal District Court of 22 ' Western Washington Cause No . C82-59 M. Playtime Theatres Inc. et 23 al . v. City of Renton , et al . After extensive evidentiary 24 hearings, that challenge Was denied by U .S. District Court Judge 25 Walter F. McGovern and an appeal has been taken from the decision 26 to the U.S . Ninth Circuit Court- of Appeals and is presently 27 pending . This court has accorded deference to the U .S . District 28 Court decision , has made the proceedings, including transcripts 29 and certain exhibits in that cause a part of the record of this 30 proceeding (Transcripts, exhibit d#103; Map of the City Limits of 31 the City of Renton, exhibit. #104 ; Diagram of adult entertainment 32 areas, exhibit #105 ; Aerial photograph showing adult entertainment 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 1 1 ! areas , exhibit #103) . These exhibits were admitted in connection 2 with pre-trial issues, but were not submitted to the advisory 3 jury . 4 Following extensive pre-trial discovery and preliminary issues resultingin a denial of summaryjudgment in favor of either s j g 6 party, the case came on for trial . An advisory jury was impa- 7 neled, pursuant to a ruling by the Court that the same was 8 necessary for the establishing of a community standard in applica- 9 tion of the Miller vs . California test . The advisory verdict was 10 returned Monday, January 23, 1984 (Advisory Jury Verdict, Appendix 11 1 ) . 12 II . NATURE OF THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCE ENACTMENT. 13 The first task involves an analysis of the ordinances as 14 enacted and amended, and the implications of the language uti- 1 15 lized . (The Text of the Applicable Ordinances . Plaintiff ' s exhi- 16 bits #68 - 71 are as follows , Appendix 2) . 17 As a preliminary summary of current law, ordinances such as 18 that enacted by Renton, will not be stricken as unconstitutionally 19 impermissible restraints upon First Amendment protections, so long 20 as certain tests may be met. Initially it should be observed, 21 that obscene materials in films or otherwise are not afforded 22 First Amendment protection. The problem is to determine which 23 materials may and which may not be so classified and in addressing 1 24 that classification, the governmental entity has a burden of over- 25 coming a presumption that the ordinance is invalid where freedom 26 of expression is involved. 27 Reasonable regulations of time, place and manner of exhibi- 28 tions of films will be permitted if the regulations are shown to 29 be necessary to further significant governmental interests . 30 Ordinances which effectively curtail total or substantial availa- 31 bility of theatres to the public or prevent entry of new theatres 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 2 ill • 1 into a limited market, will not be sustained . This would be 2 construed as a total suppression of vital speech interests and 3 would operate as a prior restraint on the content of speech. When a zoning ordinance infringes upon protected liberty, such s as freedom of expression, it must necessarily be narrowly drawn to 6 further a sufficiently substantial governmental interest and is 7 subject to close scrutiny by the courts . 8 To justify a sufficiently substantial governmental interest, 9 the City must produce some basis in fact and demonstrate that the 10 factual basis was considered in passing the ordinance. 11 The ordinance in question is modeled after the Detroit ordi- 12 nance in Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50, 49 L.Ed. 2d 13 310 (1976 ) , 96 Sup. Ct. 2440 relied upon by our own court and 14 Northend Cinema, Inc. v. The City of Seattle, 90 Wn.2d 709 , 585 is P. 2d 1153 ( 1978) . 16 By way of some difference, in addition to the prohibition of 17 the display of sexually explicit materials in a manner which 18 appeals to prurient interests within 1, 000 feet of certain family 19 uses, the Renton ordinance originally prohibited displays within 20 one mile of a public or private school ( Ordinance 3526 , Section 21 II (a) ( 2) ) and was subsequently reduced to 1, 000 feet by 22 amendment. 23 This court will not restate the long and tortuous history of 24 the struggle for definition in this area of the law since Roth v. 25 The United States , 354 U .S. 476# 1 L. Ed. 2d 1498 , 77 Sup. Ct. 26 1304 ( 1957) and forward. Many of the cases involve the applica- 27 tion of standards with criminal prosecutions being the primary 28 remedy. In recent years, civil proceedings such as abatement for 29 nuisance have been utilized . The decisions are replete with 30 illustrations of the difficulty of obtaining concensus and 31 agreement in individual cases. Literally hundreds of cases have 32 as q 1 wound their way through the state and federal systems with triers 2 of fact at odds over the application of a subjective standard with 3 appellate review of the final five U .S. Supreme Court Justices 4 being required for finality to the challenge. 5 If there be a chameleon area of the law reflecting the tenor 6 of the times and public mood, surely this is it. Any review of 7 the development of the law of obscenity illustrates clearly the 8 dramatic change in acceptability of materials and publications in 9 film and mass communications . The shock over such books as 10 "Ulysses" by James Joyce or D. H. Lawrence' s "Lady Chatterley' s 11 Lover" seem remote, except that one must consider these celebrated 12 legal challenges occurred with respect to these materials not so 13 very long ago in this century. In a society which prizes liberty, 14 tolerance and learning, we are loathe to compromise such values to IS the realm of easily abused and difficult to define censorship, 16 lest our entire political structure be adversely and irrevocably i 17 impacted, as has been demonstrated in other nations where issues 18 of public morality were subsumed by political repression. 19 At the same time, we must be mindful of competing interests 20 advanced by a public entity on behalf of its citizenry to restrict 21 the exercise of certain activities in support of other legitimate 22 community goals. In assessing the reasonableness of the effort 23 being made through its regulation, it should be recognized that a 24 community has the right and obligation to safeguard its environ- 25 ment in many ways for the enhancement of the quality of life for 26 its citizens. The government has the right not only to maintain 27 environmental standards of a physical nature, but in a broader 28 moral, public safety and aesthetic environmental framework. 29 Deference should be accorded a local community to set its own 30 parameters unless it must be prevented from doing so because of 31 constitutional prohibitions which must be enforced to safeguard 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 4 1 the right of a minority not sharing the dominant community view. 2 However , in matters of zoning generally, communities are given 3 considerable latitude in the forms of their local management and 4 development . It also is important to observe that there is no s criminal prosecution involved in this proceeding, which would 6 involve ultimate sanctions against an offender , including the loss 7 of personal liberty, incarceration and the attendant extreme sanc- 8 tions thereof . 9 It is important to keep in mind that this is a civil pro- 10 seeding in which Renton seeks basically to restrict a particular 11 geographical area and eliminate the showing of certain sexually 12 explicit films within 1,000 feet of its churches, family residen- 13 tial areas and schools . The primary issue is, of course, to what 14 extent is Renton able to do so and has it done so properly in this 15 case. 16 III . RENTON 17 ,. The City of Renton occupies the geographical area of roughly 18 15 . 6 square miles with a population of roughly 32,700 and has been 19 incorporated since September 6 , 1901. The Renton theatre with 20 which we are concerned is located on a street which must be viewed 21 as the core of the original and on-going commercial central area 22 of the city. Unlike some communities which have been a product of 23 rapid suburban growth only, superimposed on largely undeveloped or 24 minimally developed rural areas, Renton has maintained much of its 25 original downtown core area. This area not only contains commer- 26 cial uses , but single residences and church and school uses which 27 have been, and continue to be, a part of a neighborhood . Substan- 28 tial recent investment in amenities is clearly evident and within 29 a very close proximity of the theatre, residences, businesses, ;0 schools and churches, there are also municipal buildings and a 31 series of waterfront parks and recreational and civic use facili 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 5 1 ties basically within a walking distance. Renton High School and 2 St. Anthony' s Parish Parochial School are very nearby, within 3 blocks. There is no issue in this case that the theatre is 4 clearly within the zone which the City wishes to retain free of S the showing of sexually explicit films which appeal to prurient 6 interest in sex. 7 On a broader periphery, Renton is also home to a large 8 airplane manufacturing facility, Boeing, has numerous emerging 9 industrial parks and associated businesses developing in the 10 valley area, the Southcenter shopping section, numerous smaller 11 shopping centers, Longacres Race Track, and of course, is relati- 12 vely near the airport. All of these uses involve considerable 13 numbers of people moving in and out of those areas daily, although 14 this volume of traffic would not necessarily be attracted to the 15 immediate location of this theatre, but of course, might well be 16 attracted to it as a transient population if it were in 17 operation. 18 1 Evidence was introduced which showed' that at other locations 19 in Renton shopping areas , the same films being shown by stipula- 20 tion are readily available for sale or rental through video 21 Stores, primarily for viewing in residential privacy. There are 22 no restrictions by the City as to this option. The availability 23 of other specific geographic locations was not litigated in this 24 proceeding . However, as a general matter, ,a permissible inference 25 may be drawn that Renton does consist of a large geographical area 26 and that elimination of the showing of sexually explicit films at 27 the Renton Theatre will not foreclose availability elsewhere. It 28 is the conclusion of this court that Renton did not purport and 29 will not effectively eliminate the display of sexually explicit 30 films through the application of this ordinance, as in Schad v. 31 Mount Ephraim, 452 U .S . 61 (1981) (total ban) , Keego Harbor 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 6 6 1 Company v. City of Keego Harbor, 657 F. 2d, 94 ( 6th Cir . ) (1981) 2 (effective ban , a 300 acre city with 3,000 people where there was 3 no location within the confines of Keego Harbor that was not 4 within 500 feet of a bar or other regulated use. ) S The Renton ordinance simply disperses adult theatres from what 6 it has determined to be an inappropriate location. 7 In considering whether Renton is entitled to have made such a 8 determination as to this area, in pursuance of a compelling 9 governmental interest which could not be achieved by any less 10 restrictive means, this court would find that it has . It is 11 constitutionally permissible to regulate businesses of this nature 12 in the manner of the 1,000 foot type ordinance as decided in Young 13 v. American Mini Theatres, supra and Northend Cinema, supra. Even 14 if required to be narrowly drawn and required to further a IS substantial governmental interest, the ordinance is first, not - 16 designed to suppress a particular form of expression. It does 17 regulate certain conduct on a reasonable time, place and manner 18 basis to protect the quality of a neighborhood and important 19 customary amenities and needs thereof . 20 i In Young and its progeny, it is noted that concentrations of 21 certain regulated uses , including adult motion picture theatres 22 and bookstores, 23 "Tends to attract an undesirable quantity and quality of transients, adversely affects property 24 values , causes an increase in crime, especially prostitution, and encourages residences and busi- 25 nesses to move elsewhere." Id. at 55, 96 Sup. Ct. at 2455. 26 For a small commercial area, the impact of one theatre of this 27 nature certainly can be deemed to alter the atmosphere of the 28 neighborhood, is likely to affect property values, deter residents 29 from remaining and adversely will impact criminal activity. It 30 will attract some proportion of individuals of behaviorial 31 deviance with attendant risks to the citizenry as will be further 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 7 II 1 discussed. The experience of other communities in this regard is 2 pertinent. There need not be an elaborate record made in each and 3 every case as to the impact upon a particular area by virtue of 4 the one theatre involved. Renton is entitled to take defensive S note of the common experiences of other communities and need not 6 introduce the testimony of experts on an effect which is very com- 7 Mon in experience. City of Whittier v. Walnut Properties, Inc. , 8 139 Cal. App. 3rd, 618 (1983) . 9 Sexually explicit films are stimulative by definition. The 10 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the 11 American Psychiatric Association,, 3rd Edition (1982) itself at 12 section 302 .82 states, "watching pornography, filmed or live, 13 causes sexual excitement ." 14 While it may be difficult, of course, to establish that speci- IS fic untoward predatory sexual overtures are likely to occur as to - young children or high school students or others in the vicinity 16 17 of an adult theatre as a result of over-stimulated patrons of the 18 theatre, there can be some risk of that sufficient to justify 19 dispersal to areas where young people are not likely to be easily 20 accessible. 21 One of the films stipulated as representative, "Debbie Does 22 . Dallas, " which the advisory jury found obscene, focused upon sex 23 in many forms by older, married men with teenage girls. In fact, 24 the high school girls would normally have been of a chronological 25 age under 18 . These young adolescent girls are portrayed as 26 highly precocious sexually and engage in various money transac- I 27 tions designed to assist them in accompanying the football team to 28 a game in Dallas. The tone of the film projects a message that 29 these young women are sexually available, knowledgeable, entrepre- 30 neurial with respect to sex, and that sex with young women of this 31 age is not only enjoyable and desirable, but consensual. We also 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 8 i' I 1 it 1 know that it is likely to be statutory rape, a felony, and 2 directly contrary to societal norms evidenced by the most severe 3 standards of the criminal law. One need not be particularly ima- 4 ginative to see that films of this particular nature are not S suitable in the vicinity of a high school or an elementary school . 6 One of the very legitimate interests of Renton is in the security 7 of its citizens, young and old alike. 8 In the recent case of New York v. Ferber, 102 Sup. Ct. 3348 9 (1982) , Justice White in delivering the opinion of the court which 10 approved the constitutionality of a New York statute prohibiting 11 persons from knowingly promoting a sexual performance by a child 12 under the age of 16 by distributing material which depicted such a 13 performance stated, at p. 3354 , 14 "First, it is evident beyond the need for elabora- tion that a state' s interest in ' safeguarding the 15 physical and psychological well-being of a minor' is ' compelling . ' Globe Newspapers vs . The Superior 16 Court, U .S. 102 Sup. .Ct. 2613, 2621, 72 L. Ed. 2d (1982) 'A 17 democratic society rests, for its continuance upon the healthy, well-rounded growth of young people 18 into full maturity as citizens. ' Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 , 168 , 64 Sup. Ct. 438 , 19 443, 88 L. Ed. 645 (1944) . 20 Accordingly, we have sustained legislation aimed at protecting the physical and emotional well-being of 21 youth, even when the laws have operated in the sen- sitive area of constitutionally protected rights . . . 22 In Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U .S. 629, 88 Sup. Ct. 1274 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 195 (1968) , we sustained a New �3 York law protecting children from exposure to non- obscene literature. Most recently, we held that the government ' s interest in the 'well being of its 24 youth' justified special treatment of indecent 25 broadcasting received by adults as well as children. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U .S. 726, 98 Sup. 26 Ct. 3026 , 57 L. Ed. 2d, 1073 (1978) . • 27 "The prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of sur- 28 passing importance. The legislative findings accom- panying passage of the New York laws reflect this 29 concern: 'There has been a proliferation of children as subjects in sexual performances . The care of 30 children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek to profit through a commercial 31 network based on the exploitation of children. The public policy of the State demands the protection of 32 children from exploitation through sexual performances. ' Laws of New York 1977, Chapter 910 , 33 Section I . " MEMORANDUM DECISION - 9 t Justice White recognized and classified child pornography as a 2 category of material outside the protection of the First 3 Amendment. He further observed at p. 3357 , 4 "The value of permitting live performances and pho- tographic reproductions of children engaged in lewd sexual conduct is exceedingly modest, if not de 5 minimis. We consider it unlikely that visual depic- 6 tions of children performing sexual acts or lewdly exhibiting their genitals would often constitute an important and necessary part of a literary perfor- 7 mance or scientific or educational work." 8 Although distinguishable as a school library case, the Supreme 9 Court recently deferred to the discretion of school boards in the 10 daily operation of conduct in the schools as it related to books 11 available in the school library. Board of Education, Island Trees. 12 Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 73 L. Ed. 2d 435; 102 13 S.Ct. 2799 (1982) . With respect to a challenge based upon a First 14 Amendment claim, the court pointed out that if the purpose of the 15 school board were the official suppression of ideas, then First 16 Amendment rights would be violated. However , other purposes such as "educational suitability" in the view of the school board, 18 including removal because of pervasive vulgarity would not (p. 19 450) . 20 The protection of children from the negative effects of por- 21 nography, both as a developmental and safety concern is surely an 22 important state interest, and in fact of compelling and surpassing 23 special interest as these related cases illustrate. 24 To what extent , it needs to be specifically shown that deviant 25 patrons, of whom there are bound to be some, present a danger to 26 children and others should be determined with the benefit of the 27 doubt to the potential victims . Sexual abuse of children and 28 adults is an extraordinary current societal problem. Protection 29 by the city of this segment of its public and the anticipation of 30 a risk within the vicinity of schools, churches and residential 31 areas is to this court reasonable and the nexus between crime and 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 10 1 the presence of such theatres is sufficiently shown by the 2 experience of other comuunities which Renton should not have to 3 wait to duplicate before being able to enact a protective ordi- 4 nance. 5 I The very nature of these films encourages imitative conduct. 6 The repetitive style is in the nature of preoccupation and com- 7 pulsivity. Renton' s determination that such a theatre and the 8 exhibition of the films it has described and the legislative pur- 9 pose findings contained in its ordinances support a substantial 10 governmental interest which this court finds is not feasible to 11 guard against in any less restrictive manner . 12 ' Likewise, the preservation of its environment through the use 13 of zoning is a legitimate goal for a city. 14 "An adult theatre ordinance that furthers such goal satisfies the initial requirement that a city have a 15 substantial state interest to support a law restricting free speech." Basiardanes v. City of 16 Galveston, 682 F.2d 1203 (5th Cir . ) (1982) . 17 Again, a city need not establish repeatedly the factual basis 18 being considered in passing upon such an ordinance. 19 " Identical ordinances need not be tested anew each time they are enacted by a different governmental 20 entity by establishing the actual existence of local conditions which would justify it. ' Lawmakers in 21 one locale ( should not be denied) the benefit of the wisdom and experience of lawmakers in another com- munity, no matter how similar the circumstances . . ." 22 See County of Sacremento v.Superior Court (Goldie' s �3 Bookstores, Inc. ) (1982) , 137 Cal. App. 3rd 448 , 454 , 455 , 187 Cal. Rprt. 154 . "The ' factual basis ' 24 behind certain types of zoning laws insofar as those zoning laws require dispersal or deconcentration, 25 has been developed by testimony in other cases. Sociologists and urban planners have testified that 26 a concentration of adult movie theatres in limited areas leads to the deterioration of surrounding 27 neighborhoods. (See Young v.American Mini Theatres , supra. ) This testimony is sufficient and the City 28 need not bring their own sociologist to apply these observations to the City of Whittier." City of 29 Whittier v. Walnut Properties, Inc. , 139 Cal. App. 3rd 618 (1983) . 30 The dispersal of the use covered by this ordinance to a loca- 31 tion which will not conflict with family, church and school uses 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 11 • 1 is permissible so long as it does not amount to a total ban and it 2 does not. 3 Of course, the presence of but one adult theatre exhibiting 4 sexually explicit films may be less easy to demonstrate to be a 5 magnet for the perverse or criminally oriented. Nevertheless , on 6 the basis of the experience of other communities, there is to some 7 degree an offensive presence produced with deleterious environmen- 8 tal and social impacts. The nexus between pornography and crime 9 is recognized though quantification may admittedly be difficult.. 10 Suffice it to say that this court concludes that the potential 11 impact of this use upon a small, cohesive area such as the Renton 12 'core neighborhood we are dealing with is intensified because of 13 the small geographical area involved . The court finds the City 1' has managed to retain continuity over a considerable period of is time (since 1901) , although it is admittedly presently surrounded 16 by suburban growth pressure. This use is clearly out of place in 17 a family-use area and the legislative purpose outlined in the 18 City' s ordinances, as amended, are supported. This use is 19 assaultive to the sensibilities of basic community interest in 20 maintaining the wholesomeness of family life and family enjoyment 21 in the vicinity involved. The presence of such a use in itself 22 conveys a message of tolerance, approval and encouragement. No �3 matter what restraint has been exercised with respect to adver- t' tising, the titles of the films on the marquee proclaim a 25 glaringly outrageous presence virtually around the corner from St. 26 Anthony' s Church and Parochial School , the Renton Latter Day 27 Saint ' s Church, the King Baptist Church, the Christian Science 28 Church, the Renton Lutheran Church, Awareness of Life Church, the 29 Renton High School and single family and multiple family housing. 30 In an era in which the community has increasingly demanded 31 higher standards of environmental quality as to visual , olfactory 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 12 1 1 and other physical attributes, i .e. , signing, architecture, limi- 2 stations upon manufacturing and production and controls upon 3 aesthetic pollution, as well as substance pollution, the presence 4 of an adult motion picture theatre which exhibits sexually expli- 5 'cit films of this nature can likewise be considered to violate not 6 only a moral, but aesthetic standard, construed in the broadest 7 sense ( See Discussion, 90 Harvard Law Review, 196 (1975) ; Zoning, 8 Aesthetics and the First Amendment, 64 Columbia Law Review, 81 9 ;(1964) . Communities need not provide the laissez faire cacaphony 10 ,of business uses typically evident in areas where basically 11 anything goes -- head shops , pornographic shops alongside any and 12 all other uses, including family residences . The residents of a 13 ,particular community have a right to protect the community from 14 danger, degradation of its environment and a dilution of its 15 overall moral standards. This is not simply a matter of 16 appearance, but a significant value. Nothing could be more fun- , 17 damental to family standards than the basic respect of individuals 18 within a marital relationship in family context which each of 19 these films denigrates. A balancing of interests clearly dis- 20 favors forcing the presence of such a use in this location on 21 First Amendment grounds when there is no total or effective ban. 22 The presence of this type of use to the public also conveys 23 endorsement which the Renton legislative body deems incompatible 24 with reasonable promotion of other valid and superior interests . 25 The behaviors represented in most of these films is deviant and 26 Some of it represents behavior which is classified as criminal. 27 The tone of the films is, however, that of an amoral outlook with 28 the behaviors represented as being appealing and not inoffensive 29 pasttimes . Many would argue that our homes are intruded upon 30 routinely by murder , rape, violence and all manner of socially 31 undesirable conduct display and that unlike the intrusiveness of 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 13 • 1 television, adults only are admitted to- these theatres and those 2 who disfavor them, need not enter. The problem is of the very 3 presence of such a theatre in itself and where it seeks to 4 operate. Renton has, in a reasonable time, manner and place s 'restriction required the presence elsewhere, and this court 6 ;concludes that it has done so in a constitutionally permissible 7 fashion, does not trammel the rights of a minority to materials 8 ;which however unpopular or irritating may risk oppression and cen- 9 Isorship which is admittedly abhorent to a free society, and are 10 readily available elsewhere in the community. 11 This court joins the conclusion of the Federal court that this 12 ordinance is constitutional on its face and as applied and that 13 the mechanism for abatement and standards employed are entitled to 14 enforcement. IV. TEST OF THE MATERIALS 15 16 The approach of this Court to this problem has been to assure 17 several important procedural safeguards: 18 j 1 . An advisory jury representing a •cross section of our com- 19 munity was utilized to view and consider application of 20 1 the standards enunciated by the United State Supreme 21 Court in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 37 L. Ed. 22 419, 93 S. Ct. 2607 , reh. den. 414 U .S. 881, 38 L. Ed. 2d 23 128, 94 S. Ct. 26 ( 1972) to establish the degree of pro- s 24 tection which may be required as to certain enumerated 25 films . 26 This jury was drawn from the jury pool in the King 27 i . County Superior Court and represented a cross-section of 28 individuals and background and resulted in a unanimous 29 collective determination as to the ten films in its ver- 30 dict and special interrogatories (Appendix 1) . 31 1 There were six men and six women ranging in ages 1 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 14 .7 , 1 I i . 1 from 31 to 68 , three men were single without children, as 2 i was one woman, and the rest were married, one divorced I 3 with children. The combined number of years in the State 4 of Washington was 310 ; the combined number of years in S King County was 270 . (See Table below. Information sub- . 6 mitted by jurors to King County Superior Court utilized 7 by counsel in voir dire. Ct. Exh. #107. ) 8 9 10 DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE ADVISORY JURY 11 MARITAL YRS. YRS. CURRENT YRS. OP SEX AGE STATUS FAMILY BIRTHPLACE IN STATE IN CITY RESIDENCE EDUCATION OCCUPATION No. Carolina 9 12 M 37 S -- 9 Seattle 14 Utilities 98122 13 i M 31 S -- Okinawa 8 4 Seattle 16 Postal 98144 1 M 38 S 14 -- San Diego, 35 35 Seattle 16 Sales 1 California 98102 r 15 M 59 Div 3D, 37 Wisconsin 35 14 Auburn 10 Shipping 98002 Clerk M 39 M 1S 9 Seattle 39 39 Federal Way 14 16 2D 14 Lineman 198003 M 34 M • 2S 3 Los Angeles, 34 13 Seattle (S.W.) 18 Teacher V 17 I 3 mo. California 98146 P 68 M IS 38 No. Dakota 4 4 Seattle (S.) 8 y 1D 36 Aviation 18 98178 Production! F 32 M 1S 3 Victoria 14 14 Seattle (N.W.) 16 Homemaker !€ 19 98107 66 P 54 M 2S 30 Seattle 50 i 1D 22 50 Bellevue 14 Homemaker ' 98006 20 P 35 M IS 10; No. Dakota 22 22 Seattle (N.W.) 12 Homemaker 20 16,13 98117 21 P 38 9 -- Seattle 38 33 Seattle ,(W.) 16 Postal 98199 22 F 63 M 20 40 Missoula, 33 33 Rent 41 Montana 12 Aviation 98042 Production 23 24 23 26 • . . 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 15 I r 1 The court utilized this process to establish a com- 2 munity standard which would be based on the collective 3 contemporaneous judgment of representative members of the 4 community, hopefully to avoid some of the uncertainty and S difficulty of utilizing only subjective judicial opinion. 6 This problem is well illustrated in Penthouse 7 International v. McAuliffe , et al. , 610 F.2d 1353 (1980) . 8 ! If every community must wait for the subjective opinion 9 of the last five United States Supreme Court Justices, it 10 would seem to this court that there is no effective 11 remedy for a normal community with the usual public resources . No issue, it would seem to this court, should 12 13 be without some more reasonable finality. Therefore, the 14 court utilized a procedure similar to that of State ex 15 rel. Cahalan v. Diversified Theatre Corporation, 229 N.W. 16 2d, 389 (1975) , a Michigan case in which the court impa- 17 neled an advisory jury to determine whether the films in 18 question were obscene and could be abated under the 19 Michigan nuisance statute. The court in that case uti- 20 lized the three prong test of Miller v. California and 21 the jury returned a verdict finding The Devil In Miss 22 Jones, Deep Throat, It Happened In Hollywood and Little Sisters obscene. 23 24 Because of the equitable nature of the relief 25 sought, some question exists as a matter of right to 26 trial by jury. However , this court believed that this • 27 was a sensible procedure to follow, if not necessary to 28 secure an expression of a community standard through the 29 community itself . 30 2 . Secondly, as stated in the foregoing, the Miller test was 31 utilized to assist in establishing the extent to which 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 16 1 the materials were entitled to constitutional protection. 2 It is conceded that no protection is necessary for 3 materials which are obscene. 4 The ordinance definition of "used" in definition of 5 "adult motion picture" describes a continuing course of 6 conduct of exhibiting " specific sexual activities" and "specified anatomical areas" in a manner which appeals to 7 8 a prurient interest (Ordinances 3629 , Section I , 3637, 9 Section I , emphasis supplied) . The utilization of the 10 single test would ignore the now well accepted three 11 prong constitutional test of delineation of obscene 12 materials required by Miller v. California, supra, and 13 any lesser test would seem to be constitutionally inade- 14 quate unless the Supreme Court of this state determines 15 in an authoritative construction of state constitutional 16 standard that a lesser standard is adequate. 17 3 . In recognition of the key societal principles involved, 18 this court further applied a 'high standard of proof , 19 i .e. , clear, cogent and convincing, rather than that of a 20 simple preponderance of the evidence. The .burden of 21 proof was placed upon the government and the standard 22 employed is that utilized in Cooper v. Mitchell Brothers 23 Santa Ana Theatre, et al. , 102 Sup. Ct. Rprt. 172 ( 1981) . 24 This was a public nuisance abatement action and the 25 United States Supreme Court determined that proof beyond 26 a reasonable doubt would not be constitutionally 27 required. 28 In Cooper, the court also utilized a jury on the 29 issues of obscenity, public nuisance and damages prior to 30 the resolution of the equitable issues by the court. The 31 jury found 11 films obscene, 4 not obscene and was not 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 17 I . • 1 able to reach a verdict on two others. Cooper had a 2 complex litigation nistory .as well . See 101 Cal . App. 3d 3 296 , 161 Cal . Rptr . 562 (1980) ; 114 Cal. App. 3d 923, 171 4 Cal . Rptr. 85 (1981) ; 118 Cal . App. 3d 863, 173 Cal. Rptr S 476 ( 1981) and 128 Cal. App. 3d 937 , 180 Cal. Rptr . 728 6 (1982) . (Deep Throat and The Devil In Miss Jones were 7 determined obscene among others, but the litigation amply 8 demonstrates the difficulties of taking action in any 9 efficacious manner. ) 10 It is essential, of course, in issues involving prior 11 restraint that the mechanism for a determination be consistent 12 with standards which preclude arbitrary or all encompassing 13 discretion reposed in a governmental official under vague or 14 problematical speculative standards . An action to abate places 15 the tender before the court and the process utilized employs a 16 recognizable application of law by a jury which will apply a com- 17 munity standard best known to those who comprise it. If one is to 18 conclude that the shifting sands of public opinion as to these 19 matters renders this an impossible task, then no regulation would 20 be possible at all. 21 The City of Renton, in its ordinance, in providing for an 22 action to abate a nuisance contemplates a civil rather than a cri- 23 minal proceeding. Normally, this would entail a more relaxed 24 standard of proof; however, as stated , in response to the vital 25 issues raised with respect to protected speech, . this court has 26 utilized the Miller test and a higher standard of proof commen- 27 surate with constitutional requirements . 28 V. THE FILMS 29 The full record of films exhibited at the Renton Theatre com- ;0 mencing in January 20, 1983 consists of 64 films (Exhibits lA - 31 64A represented by video cassettes entered into evidence and 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 18 1 stipulated to be identical to films shown at the theatre and times 2 in question) . The ordinances in question were enacted, amended 3 and predate the challenged exhibition. There is no suggestion in 4 this case that the ordinance was designed to put the Renton 5 Theatre out of operation after the fact . 1 6 1 The parties also stipulated that ten representative films 7 would be viewed by the court and the jury in a specific order and 8 that these films were representative of the film fare exhibited at 9 the Renton Theatre. The court determined that the films would be 10 shown in the theatre, rather than in the courtroom to provide as 11 normal as possible the context in which the films would be nor- 12 mally exhibited. 13 1The films were seen on three successive days . Recesses were 14 taken in the morning, afternoon and at noon . 15 As an overall finding, this court finds that each of the films 16 selected is characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, 17 describing or relating to specified sexual activities or specified 18 anatomical areas as defined in the Renton ordinance. Although the 19 films vary as to emphasis , the court finds such emphasis to 20 overwhelmingly predominate in each and every film and to be the 21 central focus of each of the films taken and considered as a 22 whole. 23 24 The exhibition of the ten films occurred in the following 25 order: 26 27 28 1 . Little French Maid 29 2 . Devil In Miss Jones 30 3 . Up and Coming 31 4 . Society Affairs 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 19 • 1 5. San Fernando Valley Girls 2 6 . Deep Throat. 3 7 . Body Talk 4 8 . Pandora' s Mirror 5 9 . Debbie Does Dallas 6 10 . Taboo II 7 8 Instruction 14 directed the jury under the Miller test: 9 10 11 "In order to find a motion picture film obscene, as that term is used in these instructions, the plain- 12 tiff must prove each and every one of the following elements by clear, cogent and convincing evidence. 13 1 1.. That the average adult person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that 14 the motion picture film, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and 15 2 . That applying contemporary community standards, the motion picture film depicts or 16 describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and 17 3 . That the motion picture film, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political 18 or scientific value. " 19 20 Instruction 8 defined "prurient" as follows: ""Prurient" as that term is used, means a shameful 21 or morbid, meaning unhealthy or unwholesome interest 22 in sex or nudity. " 23 24 In addition to the video cassettes, the City of Renton offered 25 certain time and motion studies which were refused by the court 26 (Exhibits 1B - 64B) . 27 Certain exhibits were admitted pertaining to the City' s sta- 28 tistical analysis and printout in support of its chart 29 illustrating the percentage duration of each film illustrating 30 specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities exhi- 31 bited at the Renton Theatre (Exhibit 73, 73A, B, C, D) . 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 20 • • 1 The quantitative analysis by the City as to the stipulated 2 films was generally: 3 1 . Little French Maid 68% 4 2 . Devil In Miss Jones 70% 5 3 . Up and Coming 37% 6 4 . Society Affairs 45% 7 5 . San Fernando Valley Girls 70% 8 6 . Deep Throat 64% 9 7 . Body Talk 38% 10 8 . Pandora' s Mirror 52% 11 9 . Debbie Does Dallas 74% 12 10 . Taboo II 65% 13 The court also generally correlated sequence duration and 14 finds that the time and percentages estimated by the City are suf- 15 ficiently accurate. The court also finds as an overall finding, 16 that all of the films include a substantial content of highly 17 repetitive, sexually explicit conduct, which includes mastur- 18 bation, fellatio, cunnillingus, oral, anal and vaginal sexual 19 intercourse, often occuring simultaneously and involving several 20 people, repetitive ejaculation visibly displayed, to the body and 21 usually to the face of female participants. Same sex activity was 22 limited generally to women, although mixed groups of men and women 23 such as two men and one woman or two women and one man or numerous 24 people engaged in various activities simultaneously was common. 25 No film contained any extreme sado-masochism behavior , forcible 26 rape or violence, assaultive or mutilative behavior. The films 27 contain various types of male dominance and female submission. 28 Human genitals were overwhelmingly portrayed in a state of sexual 29 stimulation or arousal. There was continuous erotic touching of 30 human genitals and private areas, pubic regions, buttocks and 31 female breasts . Specified anatomical areas were continuously 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 21 1 v , 1 displayed in many instances for long periods of time over nearly 2 the entire area of the motion' picture screen and sequences were 3 repetitive and continuous. 4 ' Except for one film, Body Talk, sex was not treated in any 5 manner as part of a meaningful or serious relationship, .but as a 6 mechanical function with an emphasis on endurance, athleticism and 7 release. The women are dehumanized and reduced to objects of 8 sexual access. Women are projected generally as nymphomaniacs . 9 Some of the films include scenery, classical music, expensive 10 cars, houses and settings and some backgrounds for interest. 11 Despite this flimsy attempt, and some of the more recent films do 12 reflect greater production budgets, the primary and overwhelming 13 purpose of these films is to focus upon erotic sexual activity. 11 This court agrees with a film commentator, David Chute when he 15 says, 16 "Most hard core films are still produced by and for 17 men and female viewers quickly realize that the show is not intended for them. . . The emblematic figure 18 here, I think, is not the female lust object in a pornographic film, but the male star with whom the 19 male viewer is invited to identify. He is our stan- dard bearer. " 17 Film Comment 66 (S/0 1981) P. 68 . 20 21 Chute describes the two typical male leads as one who has 22 built a career shoving women around and the other more recent 23 being a person out for kicks and not power . (p. 68) The films 24 ch'allenged by Renton are typical of the foregoing. (For addi- 25 tional writing in this field, see Pornography and Silence, Susan 26 Griffin, Harper and Row, 1981; see also The Report of the 27 Commission of Obscenity and Pornography (1970) . 28 While there has been some effort to sanitize the more extreme 29 abusive and sexist aspects of this type ype of film in the more recent 30 film productions, there is little question that the basic appeal 31 is of an erotic sexual nature for men. When Mr. Forbes testified 32 with respect to the advertising available for the films, it is 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 22 1 clear that the basic appeal of the films as projected by himself 2 in making the advertising selection on several occasions reflects 3 this basic acknowledgement of the nature of the film as a basi- 4 :cally erotic type of presentation. ( P. Exh. 72, including dates 5 Hof exhibition. ) To claim that they appeal to interest other than 6 'prurience is not arguable; as to what degree of prurience may be 7 arguable only. 8 VI . THE TEN FILMS 9 1 . The Little French Maid. In spite of a background of 10 'classical music, residential backgrounds and colorful garden and 11 outdoor photography, this is basically a string of sexually erotic 12 ;and explicit scenes in which the heroine goes from vaginal , anal 13 ;and oral sex repeatedly, and talks and muses about it when she is 14 not actually doing it. There is no story line with the possible 15 lexception of the last liaison being one she sees as being more 16 promising in a love sense. However, the film is monotonously ( 17 repetitive in its complete emphasis on sex acts between the 18 heroine, a man, two men, or two women, with the locations of the 19 events changing from residential locations. Approximately 68% of 20 the film is devoted to such erotic scenes . 21 The emphasis of the film is on the observation of the various 22 sexual depictions and is devoid of any other content . It is a 23 film which centers completely upon the use of the maid by the men ?' which she does not find particularly satisfying but continues to 25 participate on a presumably voluntary basis . There is no force. 26 It is voyeuristic, patently offensive in its banality and reduc- 27 tion of the sexual experience to a fairly mechanical interface of 28 Various sexual organs and has no discernible scientific value or 29 any other value whatsoever . 30 The jury found this film obscene within the meaning of the 31 instructions and the Court concurs in that finding. 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 23 • • , I , 1 2. The Devil in Miss Jones. The film starts with a graphic 2 depiction of a young woman slitting her wrists in a drawn bath and 3 committing suicide with the blood merging with the bath water. 4 The film is in dark tones , which intends to accentuate the ima- 5 gery. (This could be due to the age of the print. ) Having com- 6 mitted suicide, Miss Jones is advised that she is condemned to 7 eternal damnation, which, the devil manages to provide for her in 8 the form of sexual tutelage to which she becomes very enamoured 9 only to be relegated in the end to an eternity of sexual frustra- 10 tion. 11 This film has an eeriness and creepy quality to it as it is 12 not only offensive to the notion of sex, but to religion as well, 13 and the ultimate sense of self loss and cosmic powerlessness . It 14 courses through the usual variety of sexually explicit and erotic 15 scenes, including graphic and complete illustrations of anal and 16 oral sex, a pair of women making love, use of a snake, all 17 occurring with complete and total depictions and occupying signi- 18 ficant episodic time sequences . 70% of the film footage is uti- 19 lized for sexually explicit erotic scenes. 20 ! It is not difficult to see how the jury found this particular 21 film patently offensive and without any serious scientific value 22 or unacceptable to contemporary community standards . The Court �3 would concur in the jury finding. 24 3 . Up and Coming. This is a newer film with a higher pro- f 25 duction budget than earlier films . It is in color and actually 26 has interesting country music in it. It also is the story of a 27 young woman who is attempting to become a country music star and 28 goes from one sexual adventure to the next in herquest in graphic g 9 P 29 detail and with the usual oral, anal, vaginal, group, single and 30 combination sexual activity to realize her ambitions. However, 31 the film does use approximately 40% of total time in the sex 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 24 1 related depictions and the balance for the story. The jury did 2 not find this film obscene, probably determining that it was not 3 offensive enough; there was a story line, some humor and a plot 4 that was less of a transparent vehicle than in some of the other S films . The Court defers to the judgment of the jury. 6 4 . Society Affairs . This is one of the more recent, higher 7 production budget films which has a story line, good photography, 8 interesting music, good settings as well as the usual smorgasbord 9 of sexually explicit activity as between women, a woman and one or 10 two men, singly or simultaneously, a variety of relationships and 11 it all centers around the wedding of an heir . The heir ' s father 12 is attempting to set him up in marriage with a woman who will 13 divorce him and secure a large property settlement for the benefit 14 of the father, with whom she is sexually involved. 15 The hero is a look-a-like for the heir and goes from one 16 sexual dysfunction rescue to the next in graphic detail and with 17 the usual oral , vaginal and anal sexual exercises and Herculean 18 phallic displays. He ultimately uncovers the nefarious plot of 19 the father and saves Howard his fortune, though his original 20 intent was simply to steal all of the wedding gifts which he now 21 secures in gratitude from Howard. Approximately 40% of the film 22 time is devoted to sex, the rest to the story, and the jury did 23 not find the film obscene. 24 The Court defers to the finding of the jury. 25 5 , San Fernando Valley Girls. This is a silly movie about a 26 style of individual whose language is peculiar to the area youth 27 culture. Adjectives such as "tubular" repeat through the film and 28 the emphasis is upon sexually erotic encounters between the girls , 29 the girls and a man or more than one man, or a mix. Except for 30 the thread of a Valley Girl Contest in a club, there is nothing 31 else in this film other than the views of the usual oral, anal, 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 25 • . 1 and vaginal sexual activity, long depictions of sustained erection 2 and ejaculation onto the mouths or onto the bodies of the young 3 women in presumed enjoyment. 4 Approximately 70% of the entire film was devoted to erotic S imagery, and only 30% to other scenes . The jury did not find this 6 film obscene, and the court defers in their finding, though it is 7 in a closer category in the Court' s view to Little French Maid. 6 6 . Deep Throat. This is a story of a sexually unfulfilled 9 young woman who is guided to the discovery of sexual fulfilment 10 when her therapist locates her clitoris in her throat. After 11 that, it is largely repetitive and compulsive enjoyment of oral 12 sex with some variations with the scenes of sexual activity 13 occupying approximately 60% of all film footage. She is utilized 14 as a kind of assistant to the therapist and her various sexual 15 encounters then involve various individuals and their respective 16 therapeutic need circumstances . One such individual, for example, 17 has to utilize a burglary/rape scenario and she is supposed to 18 pretend that she is frightened. The therapist is also repeatedly 19 engaged in sex. The emphasis of the film is clearly upon erotic 20 sexual material . There - is some element of farce. The jury did 21 not find this film obscene and the court defers to their finding, 22 although this film has been repeatedly found obscene elsewhere 23 relatively recently. 24 7 . Body Talk. This is a more recent higher production cost 25 film in color and with an emphasis upon interesting locations. An 26 older woman who is financially maintained by a voyeur falls in 27 hove with a young sculptor whose parents disapprove of the rela- 28 tionship. The woman magnanimously arranges for them to separate 29 and he to go to study art abroad as a gesture when she discovers ;0 she is terminally ill and eventually the young sculptor learns the 31 true situation and they are reunited briefly before her death. 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 26 1 ' V I • • 1 The story does occupy a substantial portion of the film and 2 approximately 40% is devoted to the usual scenes of oral, anal, 3 vaginal and group sex. There are sex scenes involving women 4 together, a woman and one or two men, with the voyeur watching at S some scenes . This is a pornographic soap opera. 6 The jury did not find this film obscene under the Miller test 7 and the court will defer to that finding. 8 8 . Pandora ' s Mirror . A young woman becomes entranced by a 9 mirror which transports her through several historical vignettes 10 in which erotic sex occurs in various contexts . She becomes com- 11 pulsively attracted to the mirror and what it provides. About 52% 12 of the film is devoted to sexually erotic scenes of intercourse of 13 an oral or vaginal nature, sustained erections, ejaculations and 14 the usual similar material to the other films . The photography, 15 settings and staging is more subtle and reflects a more 16 interesting production style, but is voyeuristic in a compulsive 17 sense. 18 The jury did not find this film obscene under the Miller test 19 criteria and the court defers to their finding although it is 20 indistinguishable from those found to be obscene. 21 1 9 . Debbie Does Dallas. This is a film in which a group of 22 high school cheerleaders attempt to raise money to accompany the 23 football team to a game in Dallas through babysitting, car 24 washing, etc. , and are soon able to improve upon the financial 25 yield by exchanging a variety of sexual favors to various men, 26 usually married men who are ostensibly either an employer or 27 school superior . There is also sexual activity graphically filmed 28 as between the girls and their football player boyfriends . 29 This film emphasizes the same type of sexual material that the 30 other films contain by way of sustained erections, oral, anal, 31 vaginal sex, ejaculations and promiscuous behaviors with the addi- 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 27 1 tional element of an emphasis upon very young women and men. 2 Though the film carries a written legend of the girls being over 3 age 18 , the obvious content of the film infers a younger chronolo- 1 i gical age, age 16 if not younger, and is very offensive in that 5 regard, not only because of the nature of the activities which are 6 in the film, but because of the emphasis on the desirability and 7 availability of very young women to older men in this fashion. 8 The film is apparently a species of film where the preoc- 9 cupation with the young is primary. The message of the film is 10 clearly that the young are experienced, knowledgeable and 11 available . The distance between a film depiction and re-enactment 12 in real life is too close for comfort. This film is beyond the 13 usual voyeurism inherent in pornographic viewing, but can easily 14 lead from myth to real life in a highly sensitive area, i .e. , 15 sexual abuse of the young which is clearly a violation of criminal 16 law as well as an extreme breach otherwise. 17 Nearly 70% of the film was devoted to sexually explicit erotic 18 scenes. The jury found this film obscene and the court concurs in 19 that finding. 20 10 . Taboo II . This is a film in which a family wallows in 21 incest. The brother is able to achieve a sexual relationship with 22 his girlfriend, his sister, a friend' s mother and his own mother . 23 The sister is able to entice her father into a sexual relationship 24 with her mother sleeping in the same bed, the entire culmination 25 of which is then satisfying sex for the parents whose marriage has 26 deadened and the father attracted to a sexual relationship with 27 his secretary. 65% of the time of the film is involved in erotic 28 depictions of the various individuals or friends engaged in group 29 or sexual activity with one another or in groups and the activity 30 is generally similar to that portrayed in all of the other films. 31 ' It is the context of blood family members which makes this film 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 28 J I , • • 1 very different and highly offensive and perverted, and without any 2 value, let alone serious scientific value. 3 The jury found this film obscene under the Miller test and the 4 court concurs in that finding. VII . THE EXPERTS 6 Richard Green, M.D. , is a research oriented psychiatrist from 7 the Department of Psychiatry, State Univerisity of New York, 8 Stonybrook. He took an undergraduate degree in Psychology from 9 Syracuse University, his medical degree from Johns Hopkins 10 University, Baltimore, continued his studies at the University of 11 London, was a faculty member at the Human Sexuality Program, 12 University of California between 1968 and 1974 and thereafter 13 established the Human Sexuality Program at (SUNY) , Stonybrook 1' where he is engaged in research as contrasted to treatment. He 15 has 100 professional publication credits and is a contributor to 16 six medical volumes . 17 At the request of the defense, he reviewed 8 or 9 video 18 cassettes of the films (excluding Taboo II) . He basically 19 testified that all of them have serious scientific value when con- 20 s,idered as a whole. 21 Dr. Green participated as a committee member in the develop- 22 ment of the American Psychiatric Association' s DSM III criteria �3 and would utilize that definition in identifying those sexual 24 behaviors which would appeal to prurient interests . He would 25 include bestiality, transvestism, exhibitionism, voyeurism and 26 sado-masochism. He would also include compulsive rapism, lust 27 murder and necrophilia, which is not specifically listed in the 28 diagnostic criteria. 29 Dr. Green testified that the films had serious scientific 30 value basically because they were capable of promoting better com- 31 munication around sex and better understanding. Where he found a 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 29 I i 1 story line or entertainment factor, he would focus upon that cir- 2 cumstance as being the primary interest of the film. He did state 3 that he would not wish to testify concerning a variety of films 4 which included bestiality, kiddie porn, rape and torture episodes. He did not see these films as transmitting a particular value 6 system, i.e. , prostitution, and did not see them as producing imi- 7 tative behavior, although he did say that couples might be willing 8 to expand their repertoire with the assistance of the variety of 9 sexual behaviors illustrated in the films . When asked if many of 10 the films reflected that one partner was using another, he did not 11 find this disconcerting in that, as he said, there appeared to be 12 an equal amount of using of one by the other of the various indi- 13 viduals . 14 The films themselves are, of course, the best evidence of what 15 they depict. Expert testimony, though affording the benefit of 16 opinion as to them, is not binding on the triers of fact. 17 While this court does respect the training, education and 18 research efforts of this witness, it finds that the conclusion 19 advanced are unsupported by the films themselves. 20 It also should be noted that this witness has testified 21 approximately 28 times, always for the defense and on about one- 22 half of those occasions, retained by defense counsel in this case. 23 Very significantly, this witness has never found any material 24 without some serious scientic value. So long as some information 25 is contained, Dr. Green would be satisfied of its serious scien- 26 tific value. If that standard were to be employed by this Court, 27 that would amount to no standard at all, and it is the view of 28 this Court, that the term "serious scientific value" must be 29 interpreted in a stricter, scholastic sense of valid, academic ;0 research process and product. 31 The witnesses for the defense appear to have had some strong 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 30 1 connection and acquaintance, if not an on-going collaboration in 2 advancing sexology as a separate academic specialty then in some 3 more informal manner . These witnesses are not typical of the 4 usual independently retained expert . While this is not as true of 5 Dr. Satterfield of Minneapolis, the others appear to be associated 6 in various ways and cannot be seen as independent from one another 7 nor very objective, since their commitment to their views is quite 8 clear and apparent. 9 Ms. Carolyn A. Livingston was called by the defense. She is a 10 sex therapist who has been trained at the Institute for the 11 Advanced Study of Human Sexuality established by another witness 12 called by the defense in this case, Robert Theodore Mcllvenna. 13 This Institute was incorporated in 1976. The State of 14 California permits the Institute as of June 1981, to confer a 15 Doctor of Education in Human Sexuality Degree (Ed .D. ) as 16 contrasted to a Ph.D. The catalog (plaintiff ' s Exhibit #3) also 17 indicates that a Ph.D. candidate prepares a traditional disser- 18 tation, and also indicates additional degrees, Master of Human 19 Sexuality (M.H.S. ) and a Doctor of Human Sexuality (D.H.S . ) . 20 There are also professional programs which award certificates, 21 including Forensic Sexologist certificates and a summer cer- 22 tificate program. Ms . Livingston secured a Doctorate from the 23 Institute and her research work involved studies of Venusian 24 Church members in the Seattle area. 25 Ms. Livingston is also a trained registered nurse. She speaks 26 to many groups throughout the state, mainly in medical contexts 27 such as the Providence Hospital Cardiac Unit, Post-Surgery, 28 Ileostomy, Alcoholism Recovery, Sexual Adjustment and estimates 29 that she has spoken to approximately 7, 000 people. She speaks 30 mainly to physicians, nurses, social workers, students at various 31 colleges and various community groups. 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 31 • Q • 1 She does not use the films involved in this litigation in her 2 presentations, although she does use other film materials. 3 She testified as to the films that their fantasy and educa- 4 tional , therapeutic and communication content supported in her s opinion a serious scientific value criteria of the Miller test . 6 She testified that none of the films , in her opinion, appealed to 7 a prurient interest in sex. 8 She surprisingly testified that she felt Deep Throat was 9 capable of being shown on prime time television, suitable for 10 viewers 16 years of age and over. She would define morbid to the 11 point of being nearly pathological or making one sick and would 12 include in that, sex with animals, voyeurism, exhibitionism, and 13 the use of children. 14 The defense witnesses shared the view that the reason for 15 attendance at such films was a healthy curiosity about sex. 16 This witness appears to the court to be sincerely motivated in 17 assisting individuals in overcoming medically related sexual dys- 18 functions or disabilities . Her views , however , with respect to 19 the relative mildness of the films in issue as compared with an 20 available range she may be familiar with, does not necessarily 21 reflect the Washington overall community standard which this court 22 finds to be more restrictive than the standard advanced by this 23 witness . The court finds that her audiences are not as cross sec- 24 tional as our randomly selected jury. 25 On cross examination, Ms. Livingston did acknowledge her con- 26 cerns that certain of the films were therapeutically defective. 27 For example , she did acknowledge the risk of transfer of bacteria 28 from one bodily cavity to another with uninterrupted progression 29 from oral/vaginal/anal/oral/vaginal sex without hygienic cleans- 30 ing . She also questioned the concept of a therapist and patient 31 engaging in sex such as was portrayed in Deep Throat; testified 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 32 4. • 1 that she was opposed to public sex, although she did not equate 2 the film scenes. depicting group activity as such. She also 3 testified that she was not comfortable with Taboo II. 4 Again, the very general use of "science" as potential self- ' help is not viewed by this court as comporting with the formal 6 systematic, empirical study and examination normally associated 7 with that term and the intent of the United States Supreme Court 8 in that connection. 9 Dr. Sharon Satterfield is the Director of the University of 10 Minnesota Medical School Sexuality Program, which she stated to be 11 the largest medical school clinic of its kind in the United 12 States, both as a treating and research facility. Dr. Satterfield 13 specializes in Child Abuse ( sexual) and conducts a treatment 14 program for perpetrators, mainly middle class patients (currently 15 70 offenders) . This witness has extremely high professional cre- 16 dentials . She has testified previously in favor of a proposed 17 Minneapolis ordinance to the consternation of Mr. Mcllvenna and 18 she has participated in governmental regulation. 19 She is well acquainted with the professional literature and 20 acknowledges that she has seen some cases of habitual use of por- 21 nography, one or two compulsive users. 22 In treatment, fantasy provides for a broader communication and 23 she testified that the underlying fantasy of offenders must be 24 surfaced in the treatment process . She would see the fantasy sti- 25 mulation content of Devil In Miss Jones, Pandora' s Mirror and all 26 of the films as containing serious scientific value and testified 27 that such films have been used with positive results in 28 treatment . 29 Her definition of science is a broad definition of a systema- 30 tic acquisition of knowledge. 31 The court is at a loss with the testimony of this highly 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 33 1 qualified physician and concludes that she simply has been per- 2 suaded and holds the views held by Mr. Mcllvenna and Dr. Green 3 which this court has not accepted as controlling in this case. 4 Robert Theodore Mcllvenna is the Director of the Institute V S for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality. He also is an ordained 6 United Methodist Minister. He is a leader in the effort to 7 establish sexology as a separate discipline and is the leadership 8 force in an international, as well as national effort in that 9 regard. He has testified in many courts. He has accumulated con- 10 siderable data drawn from Sex Attitude Profiles from all persons 11 engaging in programs with his institution and has undertaken field 12 research and has had on-going professional contact with many 13 institutions in the Northwest and various professionals . 14 The Sex Attitude Profiles are updated every six months, one, 1$ two and five years, with some attrition factor . The court obser- 16 ves that those who submit these profiles are, of course, indivi- 17 duals who are willing and interested in revealing such information 18 about themselves which indicates a certain self-selection in the 19 group sample represented. 20 In testifying as to his opinion that none of the films appeal 21 to prurient interest, Mr.- Mcllvenna characterized Deep Throat as 22 mythology, Devil In Miss Jones as a classic film, Debbie Does 23 Dallas as one of the most popular films of all times "which simply 24 shows a lot of sexual activity," Taboo II as a "thinly guised 25 incest thing. . . (where) everyone knows what is going on and goes 26 home, Little French Maid as a series of sex activities." 27 This witness testified that he knows Dr. Green, Dr. 28 Satterfield and Ma. Livingston. He acknowledged that he was 29 shocked and dumb-founded at Dr. Satterfield' s pro-regulation 30 testimony in Minnesota. He himself has testified for the.defense 31 on all occasions. He discussed, that the testimonial fees he 32 „ 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 34 • 0 1 receives are used to balance his research funds for institute 2 activity. 3 While Mr. Mcllvenna was permitted to express an expert opinion 4 because of his on-going collection of data and experience in the Washington area, it is the conclusion of this Court that his atti- 6 tudes are greatly influenced by his commitment to his organization 7 and its purposes and are more reflective of a limited San 8 Francisco environment than that of this state. His data is not 9 reflective of the mainstream of Washington residents and as the 10 jury verdict reflects . Further, certain personal strategies of a 11 therapeutic nature utilized by Mr. Mcllvenna are professionally . 12 unsupportable and created considerable question in the mind of 13 this trier of fact as to the professional judgment utilized by Mr. 14 Mcllvenna in his professional work. 15 The City of Renton introduced the testimony of Professor 16 Ernest R. Van Den Haag, a treating New York psychoanalyst and 17 current Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University. 18 Professor Van Den Haag has taught law and has lectured widely at 19 various prestigious academic institutions, including the Harvard 20 Medical School , Yale, Stanford, Berkeley and taught at the New 21 School for Social Research. He taught at the latter a course in 22 Love and Sex. He has written extensively in the area of 23 pornography which he readily admits he opposes in all forms . His 24 lectures are concerned with the separation of sexual gratification 25 from affection, love as between individuals and forms of love such 26 as between parent and child and between man and woman. 27 He defines science as an attempt to discover new facts for the 28 purpose of being able to control or predict behavior . He rejects 29 fantasy enrichment as any part of scientific endeavor and sees ;0 these films as reducing the participants to the functioning of 31 their sexual organs . He finds that there are clearly messages in 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 35 • 1 the films of a misleading and harmful nature. 2 He views Taboo II as recommending incest between a father and 3 a daughter as a means to promote a better sexual adjustment bet- 4 weep the parents whose marriage is vapid. He sees Little French Maid as outright promiscuity which in turn he views as a self- 6 destructive phenomenon leading to personality disintegration of 7 the participant. 8 He sees none of the films as healthy or wholesome and views 9 the humans as being either mutually exploitive and utilizing the 10 women as sex objects . He testified that in his view, no one in 11 the films has any real interest in another person and only as a 12 means to selfish sexual gratification. 13 As to the emerging specialty of Sexology, he would find this 14 highly questionable, though he did recognize that there have been 15 past scholars who have attempted to address the subject in more 16 particularity, notably Kraft-Ebbing, Herschfeld, Freud, Black, 17 Mircuse. 18 He believes that some people who ' attend these films are 19 curious , others addicted and obsessed with the movie replacing 20 gratification and becoming a masturbatory stimulus and he believes 21 the same to be anti-therapeutic in that some persons can become 22 dependent on such films as a sexual outlet. He testified that he 23 has personally studied the attendance of persons at such films and 24 estimates that approximately 20 - 25% of the attendees are habi- 25 tuals . He bases this upon his own observations and inquiries 26 regarding practice of attendees and employees personally com- 27 municated with by himself at the theatres. He estimated that of 28 300 - 500 patients and approximately one third attending movies, 29 he estimates that a half again of those, he would consider ;0 addicted or compulsive habituals. 31 In discussing the pathological aspects of the films , he 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 36 - 1 pointed to the excessive and dangerous sexual attachment to a 2 parent in Taboo II r the pleasure of voyeurism in Pandora' s Mirror 3 and saw the love affair in Body Talk between the woman the young 4 sculptor as being merely after-thought. 5 In his opinion, none of the films had any meritorious value as 6 would be required under the Miller test and hence, all would be 7 obscene. 8 Dr. Jack Raymond Faghin, is a practicing clinical psychiatrist 9 in the Seattle area who has treated patients with sexual problems 10 since 1953 . His patients include a broad spectrum of economic, 11 age and cultural groups. He acknowledged that he does not publish 12 because of the demands upon his time by his treating work, 13 attempts to maintain current knowledge of medical and professional 14 materials in the field and is generally familiar with conventional 15 media publications. He is especially interested in sexual abuse 16 issues, particularly as to children. 17 He testified he is unaware of any scientific article which 18 explores the nature of individuals who 'attend sexually explicit 19 movies. He did state that he was able to find a three line com- 20 ment indicating that sexually explicit films could be useful in a 21 treatment modality. He, himself , does not use films and testified 22 that he would not send a patient to such movies, as he believes in 23 guided therapy. 24 He would not support sexology as a separate discipline because 25 he believes that it is professionally mandatory to consider the 26 interaction of the entire personality and he cites other pro- 27 fessionals as being in support of that position, including. Dr. 28 Helen Singer-Caplan of Cornell and Dr. Harold Leaf of the 29 University of Pennsylvania. 30 In considering the ten films, Dr. Faghin expressed his opinion 31 that none of the ten have any serious scientific value. He 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 37 i 1 rejected the proposition that fantasy value was equivalent to 2 scientific value or that communicative value was of scientific 3 value, although he would acknowledge that it could be useful. 4 Likewise, he found no serious educational or therapeutic value in s the films . 6 As to the latter, he believed that the film messages were in 7 fact harmful. He testified that in Taboo II, in his opinion, the 8 impression is given that incest is acceptable, and as a physician, 9 he testified forcefully that in no, instance has he ever seen any 10 benefit derived as a result of incest. In fact, it was, in his 11 view, clearly harmful. 12 He believed that the overriding message of Debbie Does 13 Dallas, i .e. , the exchange of sexual favors for money, is a Simi- - 14 larly negative message and not therapeutically useful, but 15 destructive. 16 He testified that in his opinion, all of the films appealed to 17 prurient interest, are patently offensive and breach our community 18 standards . 19 He especially referred to sex with patients as being decried 20 by every reputable professional organization in the country in 21 criticizing Deep Throat. He was candid in saying that the public 22 might tolerate movies in an adult theatre, it would not find 23 acceptable on prime time television. 24 Dr. Faghin, in this court' s opinion, was the witness most clo- 25 sely familiar with the state population with which we are con- 26 cerned in establishing a community standard . 27 He also has direct clinical experience with this community 28 over many years of a highly qualified nature. 29 This court has accepted his testimony as being the most pro- 30 fessionally acceptable and accurate in reflecting a professional 31 whose approach is to consider the integrated personality, testi- 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 38 1 mony which is mote probative by virtue of being locally clinically 2 corroborated and offers an acceptable and reputable medical stan- 3 dard . 4 His testimony, as it is consistent with that of Professor Van 5 Den Haag is also borne out to a greater degree by our advisory 6 jury who rejected the views being advanced by the defense. 7 While not obligated to do so, this court has accepted the ver- 8 dict of the jury as the basic expression of our community with 9 respect to the issues being considered. The jury thoughtfully and 110 deliberately considered each film as the special interrogatories 11 indicate, and returned their verdict. 12 The jury was able to consider each film independently as their 13 special interrogatories reflect. While this court might in some 14 particulars vary in view as to the individual films and the ulti- 15 mate conclusion reached, it has determined to accept the collec- 16 tive expression of this jury as being reasonable and will confirm 17 the same, finding also that each of the films is substantially 18 similar in genre as depicting "specified sexual activities" or !Si "specified anatomical areas" in a manner which appeals to a 20 prurient interest in sex as a continuous course of conduct since 21 January 20, 1983. 22 The Court recognizes the jury verdict as being the primary 23 community expression of the standard applicable. In finding four 24 of ten films obscene, one might view 40% in too literal a mathema- 25 tical sense. The ten films stipulated to by counsel do not 26 necessarily reflect the most offensive nor the mildest of the 27 total sixty-four films and must be considered as a compromise 28 group. It is the conclusion of this court in view of this cir- 29 cumstance, that there is in fact a heavy weighting in the direc- 30 tion of unprotected materials. The court finds that the jury 31 verdict more than suffices to support the continuous course of 32 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 39 4 t 1 conduct requirement of the ordinances, and that inasmuch as all of 2 the films reflect an identical genre and emphasis , that their 3 exhibition should be abated at the Renton Theatre. 4 VIII . THE REMEDY S Abatement as to the exhibition of the films determined to be 6 obscene is clearly appropriate and will enter. 7 The Court is prepared to find that there is no adequate remedy 8 at law available to the plaintiffs short of restraining the defen- 9 dants from exhibiting at the Renton Theatre, films such as those 10 demonstrated to have been shown continuously since January 20, 11 1983, and that the four films found by the jury to be obscene are 12 substantially identical in genre to those displayed generally and 13 represented in the six other stipulated films, that the exhibition 14 o,f these films does constitute a nuisance per se, and an "adult 15 motion picture theatre" as defined in Renton Ordinance No. 3526 as 16 amended, and that the same should be abated by injunctive order. 17 The question of further available equitable remedy is reserved by 18 the Court for additional submission of law under the law of the 19 State of Washington pertaining to injunctions and abatement and 20 other remedies as may be appropriate. 21 What is less certain is the availability of other sanctions 22 under the general equitable power of this court under state law. 23 Other courts have struggled with this question. Van deCamp v. 24 American Art, 188 Cal. Rprt. 740 ( 1983) . There is merit in the 25 argument that the court should be empowered to utilize flexible, 26 equitable remedies if permitted by state law. The question of the • 27 full form and detail of injunctive relief will therefore abide 28 additional legal submission and additional presentation. 29 DATED this g day of , 1984 . 30 31 eX4L 32 JUDGE W NCY ANN HOLMAN 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION - 40 • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting • January 23, 1984 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, Council President; EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. COUNCIL MEMBERS TRIMM, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER. CITY STAFF IN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; CAPTAIN JAMES BOURASA, Police Department. PRESS Pat Jenkins, Renton Record-Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL At Councilwoman Mathew's inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch clarified that on page two, paragraph two, the first line should read: Mayor Shinpoch reiterated Council suggestion that the citizens form a co-op or a Local Improvement District to find funding solutions to the problem. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANAURY 16, 1984 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Doris Stott, 4300 NE Sunset Boulevard, #H-1 , member of Citizens Playtime Court for a Quality Community, commended City Attorneys for superior Case representation of the Cify in Playtime Theate- trial , and thanked City officials for their support of the Committee. Appreciation was extended to Councilwoman Kathy Keolker, former Committee Chairperson, and to Co-Chairpersons Chuck Slothower and Carolyn Yahoudy, who were introduced. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Magraw Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $189.89 filed by Kevin W. for Damages Magraw, 11009 SE 220th Place, Kent, for tires allegedly damaged CL 52-83 by hole in the road on 200th Street just east of Talbot Raod (12/29/83) . Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Dressel Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $487.86 filed by Janet C. for Damages Dressel , 26822 148th SE, Kent, for automobile damage allegedly CL 02-84 incurred when struck by City of Renton fire truck (1/6/84) . Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Insurance Fund Finance Department requested ordinance to establish a new "Insurance Fund" and provide transfer of funds for Self- Insurance Program in the amount of $500,000. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Hughes presented a Committee on Committees Committee on report recommending the following committee chairmanships and Committees committee assignments for the Council for 1984: 1984 Committee WAYS AND MEANS PUBLIC SAFETY Chairmen and Eai1 tTymer, Chairman John Reed, Chairman Members John Reed, Vice Chairman Thomas Trimm, Vice-Chairman Nancy Mathews, Member Kathy Keolker, Member COMMUNITY SERVICES TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) Kathy Keolker, Chairman Thomas Trimm, Chairman Nancy Mathews, Vice-Chairman Richard Stredicke, Vice-Chairman Richard Stredicke, Member Kathy Keolker, Member PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES Richard Stredicke, Chairman Nancy Mathews, Chairman Earl Clymer, Vice-Chairman Kathy Keolker, Vice-Chairman John Reed, Member Thomas Trimm, Member Renton City Council 1/23/84 Page Two Old Business continued Committee on MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE Committees RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Chairman Reed presented a report indicating Committee the consensus of the Committee that since drastic increases in King County service costs for the King County Health Services contract will Health Services not occur until 1986 and the City maintains the option of Contract canceling its contract with King County with one year ' s notice, the following is recommended: 1 ) The Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the King County Health Services contract after the City Attorney has reviewed the document. 2) Since the City will be charged according to the units of of service provided by the Health Department, the feasibility of conducting an independent audit should be pursued to ensure the accuracy of the County' s date. 3) The Administration should investigate any alternative method of providing State mandated heath services at a more reasonable cost. Continued This subject matter should be retained in Committee so that the Administration can report on the status of the efforts outlined above. "No Children" Community Services Chairman Reed presented a report recommending Policy in that no action be taken on the 11 /20/83 referral regarding a Housing "No Children" Policy in housing. S. 3rd Street Community Services Chairman Reed presented a report recommending Business Area no action be taken on the matter of the South Third Street Revitalization business area revitalization plan as requested by Mr. Cordero, referred to the Committee on 7/12/82. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Committee regarding Housing and Community Development Block Grant Funds. Reduction in 1984 The City of Renton recently received notice from King County of Housing and a 7. 1% reduction in the 1984 entitlement to the King County Community Consortium. For Renton, this will mean a reduction in available Development population funds of $8,658. King County Block Grant staff has Block Grant requested that the City make this reduction by Friday, Funds January 27 in order for the Joint Policy Committee to review applications in early February. Continued The Community Services Committee met with staff last Tuesday and reviewed ways of reducing the 1984 Program to accommodate the reduction in funds. As outlined on the attachment, the Committee concurs in the following reductions: $3,847 from the Housing Assistance Program; $896 from the Neighborhood Clean-Up Program; $1 ,175 from the Highlands NSA Improvements - Phase I ; $2,740 from the Planning and Management Program. Continued Upon review, the Community Services Committee recommends reductions to the above referenced 1984 Program applications. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Noise Buffer Citing discussion regarding noise buffer requirements on SR-515 on SR-515 on 1/16/84, Councilman Reed reported research indicates that the City Council , not the Administration cr staff, had been responsible for not requiring the noise buffer as part of Victoria Hills Plat approval . Mayor Shinpoch advised that she has written the State Department of Transportation as Council had directed on 1/16/84 and asked them to do a decibel count and tell her if it meets their standards. If the DOT will not perform the test, the Stat. Department of Labor and Industries will be asked. Renton City Council 1/23/84 Page Four Ordinances and Resolutions continued Boeing Hold Harm- HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR HANDLING. less Agreement CARRIED. Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 55497 through 55723 and 55486 through 55487 in the amount of $1 , 177, 182.76 and $30,731 .46, respectively, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. Vouchers 55477 - 55485 and 55488 - 55496 machine voided. Warrants include LID 314: $211 ,938.58. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS An appointment to the LEOFF Board will be made by Mayor LEOFF Board Shinpoch prior to its next meeting on February 1 , 1984; all Appointment Council members will be notified. L-1 Zone Councilman Trimm advised receipt of a letter from Hearing Height Examiner Fred Kaufman regarding height limitation in L-1 , Limitation Light Industrial Zone. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, THIS COMMUNCIATION BE REFERRED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First City Upon inquiry by Councilwoman Mathews regarding correspondence Equities - from First City Equities Corporation concerning Manufacturing Earlington Park Park Zone Ordinance and Earlington Park, Mayor Shinpoch advised a copy would be obtained and appropriate referral , either to staff or Council committee, would be determined. Self- Insurance Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke regarding establishment Funding of "Insurance Fund" after adoption of 1984 budget , Administrative Assistant Parness explained existing budgeted funds from various sources are being pooled to establish funds for Self- Insurance Program. ADMINISTRATIVE Lt. Ray Caldwell , Police Department, testified on behalf of the REPORT City at recent Judiciary hearing in Olympia on legislation Weapons in regarding carrying weapons in places that sell alcoholic beverages. Bars Legislation Although no decision has been made, the State is poised to preempt the City in this field. Fireworks Law In response to Council request, Legislators have been notified by mail of desire to return to "safe and sane" fireworks laws. Day in Olympia The Association of Washington Cities will be having a Legislative Convention Convention, "Day in Olympia," on February 16, 1984 for anyone interested in attending. The Council Secretary should be contacted for information regarding registration and accommodations. Health Care The Personnel Department is sponsoring a Health Care Cost Cost Containment Containment Workshop on Friday, February 3, 1984, for Workshop representatives of various employee groups as well as members of the City Council . The program will encompass the problem of medical costs, an examination of where the City of Renton fits into the problem, and discussion of potential solutions. AUDIENCE COMMENT Chuck Slothower, 517 S. 17th, congratulated the City Council for Playtime Court its foresight in approving a zoning ordinance regarding X-rated Case movies. He then questioned specifics of the trial . City Attorney Lawrence Warren explained instruction to the advisory jury by Judge Holman that the City's ordinance required proof of obscenity as well as proof that the films appeal to prurient interest. The Miller test of obscenity has three criteria: the film must appeal to prurient interest; be patently offensive; and lack serious, literary, artistic, political or scientific value. The jury had found evidence of a continous course of conduct, appeal to prurient interest, and four of the ten films to be specifically obscene. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:52 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Renton City Council 1/23/84 Page Three Old Business continued AWC Workshop Councilwoman Keolker relayed messages of encouragement in Playtime lawsuit from attendees at recent Association of Washington Cities Workshop for newly elected officials. She also advised receipt New Statutes of new Conflict of Interest and Appearance of Fairness Doctrine for Officials statutes which she will provide to interested Council memoers. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading; Ordinance #3787 An ordinance was read amending Section 1-4101 of Title I Shoreline Master (Administrative) relating to Shoreline Master Program Fees. Program Fees MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, KEOLKER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3788 An ordinance was read relating to contracting indebtedness; Limited Tax providing for the issuance, specifying the maturities, maximum General effective interest rate, terms and covenants of a $240,000 par Obligation value "Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 1984," of the City Bonds, 1984 for strictly City purposes to provide funds with which to pay the cost of planned equipment purchases of the City; and providing for the sale of such bond. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3789 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance No. 3201 which vacates Amends Ordinance a portion of Talbot Hill South and 100th Avenue SE by releasing No. 3201 (Renton a portion of easements retained by the City. (First reading Plaza Associates) 11/21 /83) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Gen Seng Avenue An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Gen Seng Avenue Street Vacation south of NE 36th Street. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, VAC 1-83 COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. Councilman Clymer explained origin of street name. CARRIED. Special Assessment An ordinance was read establishing a special assessment district Water District - for water service in the South Talbot Hill - Valley General Talbot Hill/VGH Hospital area, and establishing the amount of the charge upon connection to the facilities. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading and adoptior+.: Resolution #2536 A resolution was read providing for transfer of funds in the Cedar River amount of $12,000 from Contingency Fund and Cumulative Reserve Trail Paving Fund unto Cedar River Trail Paving/Logan - N. 6th Street Fund. Fund Transfer MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Northward Rezone Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report R-018-82 recommending that the Northward Rezone, File No. R-018-82, referred to Committee on 5/16/83 and placed on first reading 10/17/83, be referred to the full Council with no recommendation. For the record, Chairman Clymer explained responsibility for delay of ordinance adoption belongs with the developer, not the Committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THE MATTER OF THE NORTIWARD REZONE BE LAID ON THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THE NORTHWARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BE NOTIFIED THAT THE NORTHWARD REZONE HAS BEEN LAID ON THE TABLE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND IF SIGNED CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT IS RECEIVED, THE MATTER WILL BE RECONSIDERED AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1984. CARRIED. Boeing Hold Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Harmless recommending that the Hold Harmless Agreement with the Boeing Agreement Company for airport emergencies be referred to the City Attorney for handling (referred 9/19/83) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY