Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-167 , „. . . , ‘,----. \ i k\ -sizy, 4,1 - i i •/Ai KV, • -.. ._q_IDEP rs - I , I . . • 4 111-4 : sT ; . t3f4ta .-- 4: a 03 -17-1L-71 A RT 1.4 LI M. 13. : AOT 13A 14 A SW AO So 5} I li•BB ACRE '', I ''.., i T i . 4$•..7-.. .-a-,-,f;;,,,,,,•.--747.-L,.. :2-...&1 i 1 lii , 1 - I . - i Para RI E 1 ha KET- Z __ 13 , . , • i i , • I l• ! 1 4 • i D •••S:/ ! . 1 C4RL SM at; 1 - •••••... . . . , ..) i 1 . CITI OF Reti ToN I P.L. NO IV t4 . i-J-7 , I I I - I . 1 I I , I- i I li I NL _. . . s c A L e. \ " z 2.00 I . \ . \. ----,-- -- . •C3 , i • . 0 , . • Crl THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE, 0=C :-..-.. • Filed for Record at Request of I . . . . . Lt.- l'•1 LA., cc , . • . w.: - ... Name OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK RENTON.MUNICIPAL BLDG. • . Lc. ci . c—I .• ,,___ 200 MILL AVE. SOUTH • . . . C1,1 . . . . • ::,Cy Aa4res8 RENTON:MASH. 9805S • '' • . , • .C) • ' C-3 4.1 . • C3 ,....i City and State • . • . . . . co • . . . . . . . • . . . . • r4 . •tn . .... .•• • In ' . . ' . . • . . • - . . Quit Claim Deed . • . . . • • . • . • . . . . . . . . . , . . . 92 THE GRANTOR ARTHUR D. SWANSON ' . : • ii-- • so. . . . • f for and in consideration of 1-•-• • C...2 CD conveys and quit claims to THE CITY OF RENTON . . . . the following described real estate,situated in the County of KING State of Washington, . together with all after.acquired title of the grantor(s) therein: . . . . , . . . . The west 6 feet of the following described property: . . • West 264 feet of-the east 1300 feet of North 1/4. of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 16 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , less road. . . 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED . . . King Co.. Records Divisibn , ALLid.davz By • . . . • , pitted \ -- ,1 l'\Sk-)1Yt . 0 , 19 ji_t___. . ' ( k( , / (AA .(-) -0(AA417V\ (Individual) Pc---. 4,-- 1/4 67-' V-'--- ‘-:-.-f_. ..--s-r_or , .. By (Individual) . . (President) By • • , • (Secretary) . . • . . . • S IA IT, OF WASI •IINGTUN STATE OF WASHINGTON ' . SS. COUNTY OF \"(:‘ COUNTY OF ' . On this day pe a rsonally ppeared before me On this day of ) ss'. before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash „c ,• ,V.I. , c)c\kk_I\. V, . (;kad,..14,-..,61/1 ington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared • . to me known to be the indiyidual,ilescribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, • and • and acknowledged that AVE'y..• signed the same to me known to be the ''-..,. . President and Secretary, • as .. \-\.•&%r free and voluntary act, and deed, .respectively,of . for the uses and purposes therein mentionetVwt''' ,„, the corporation that executed 'the foregoing instrument, and.acknowledged 01. ".10e said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpor- • r .o • atfpn, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that ,..,....: ,• . , •. r!ti,,, , . authorized to execute the suaidinOrurnent and that the seal • . •GIVEN under my hand and Oil:iris! Neal.t.h.:*s.,, 0;1140 is the corporate seal of said corporation. day of t10 c Q e k. : ..• . •• ID :N. ' i ....Witness any hand and official seal-hereto affixed the day and year first ,k . ' .., ‘ ).-: :'; '-?" " • - . . aboidorritten. . . . • \\W‘.6.' b\\-- ' 't, k4.,i.kti ' • . .' • -'••,..-• • . . . ,. . . . Notary Public in and tonthpate of Wash. .•....). :: . - ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, .., .• • . ington residing at . • .V-94. 4.i. : . - residing at ';i,"- . . ' . . ' . . • .. . . .'. ' .. . 0"frii• ._ 40.'j .'.' . • —• • - . • . . . , • 4 vi .:1 i,1 Affidavit of Publication 11 Public Notices STATE OF WASHINGTON l COUNTY OF KING ) ny been duly considered by ' he Honrng Examiner and said zoning request being in t ;onformity with the City's ;omprehensive Plan, as Ann E. Walb intended, and the City I Y being first duly sworn on ;ouncil having duly consi- 'ared all matters relevant t oath,deposes and says that S heis the C h e i f Clerk of •,ereto, and all partiesai ha y-ig been heard appearing In t THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) upport thereof or in opposr times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and on thereto, NOW THERE- 1 has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred :ORE to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- THE CITY COUNCIL OF paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, HE CITY OF RENTON, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper._ThAt N AS H I NGTON, DO OR the Renton )AIN AS FOLLOWS: Record-Chronicle has been approved as a Legal tiewspaper by orderof the SECTION I:The following t Superior Court of the County in whicli it is published,to-wit,King County lescribed property in the )sty of Renton is hereby Washington.That the annexed is Ordinance 3 2 3 6 ezoned to Business District B-1 ) as hereinbelow ,._, - specified,subject to the find- - ngs, conclusions and deci- ;ion dated June 15,1978 of he City's Hearing Examiner; as it was published in regular issues(and he Planning Director is not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period tereby authorized and di- acted to change the maps >f the Zoning Ordinance,as emended, to evidence said of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the ezoning,to-wit: West 264 feet of the East k dayof ,19 ,and ending the 1300 feet of the North g One — Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of da of 19... both dates Section 16,Township 23 —1••1• v a•uqcfuet 7.8• North, Range 5 East, inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- N ,King County, scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee M,Washington. (Said pro- perty located on North- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 5 hich east 4th Street between has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundre won s or the Greenwood Cemetery first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent and Union Avenue insertion. Northeast) /� .._ AND SUBJECT FURTH (:011,---21.105) E /�,.1978.T1348. ER to that certain e- �,.e tion of Restrictive Coven- CITY OF RENTON, ants executed by Petitioner- Che.i.f...Clerk WASHINGTON owner on or about Julyin the 5, ORDINANCE NO.3236 1978, and recorded (R-167-78) office of the Director of Re- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11 day of AN ORDINANCE OF cords and Elections ReceiV- THE CITY OF RENTON, in No. 7807210772 and WASHINGTON which said convenants are ; -August , 19...7.a CHANGING THE ZON hereby incorporated and ING CLASSIFICATION made a part hereof as If fully " /�� /3 OF CERTAIN PROPER- set forth. rrCK.l.. TIES WITHIN THE CITY SECTION II: This Ordi Notary Pu " and for the State of Was ' ton, OF RENTON FROM Rance shall be effective up- residing at Kent, Kin unty. GENERAL CLASSIFI- on its passage,approval and - i CATION DISTRICT (G) five(5)days after its publics- r :k+ TO BUSINESS DIS tion. TRICT (B-1) PASSED BY THE CITY Pas' slature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June WHEREAS under Chap COUNCIL THIS 7th day of 9th 1 % r 7,Title IV.(Building Regu Au ust, 1978. ..,t Maxine E. Motor, t'Af'1' legraph Co. rules for words and fi ures, lions) of Ordinance No. g '` Qcounting B Deputy CityClerk ;,^ ;�., 328 known as the"Code of P y Adopter :•: -ewspapers of the State. APPROVED BY THE :IT-,- (moral Ordinances of the ,f ., ty of Winton', as amend MAYOR THIS 7th Day of i, and the maps and 'e' August, 1978. iris adopted in conjunction Charles J. Delaureenttii erewith, the propertd reinbelow described has A proved as to form: V.P.C.Form No.87 xetofore been zoned as Lawrence J.Warren, 3neral Classification Dis City Attorney ct(G); and Published in The Rentoi WHEREAS a proper pets Record-Chronicle Augus in for change of zone 3ssification of said proper- has been filed with the arming Department on or )out April 17, 1978 which 3tition was duly referred to e Hearing Examiner for vestigation, study and iblic hearing, and a public 3aring having been held ereon on or about May 30,, 378, and said matter hay C k `%1C) z , MEMORANDUM E DATE: August 1 , 1978 \<4;-/ IM�p TO: Mike Smith, Planning Department FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director ;7//' j lk? t - S,JBJECT: NE 4th Street -- Swanson, Stone, Mastro and Wehrman Land Use Development The above-referenced land development has come to our attention on an individual basis, but requires a comprehensive analysis of all four combined properties in regard to access. The portion of the property of Mike Mastro's which is proposed for apartments or condominiums with a possible restaurant has a projected traffic volume of 1 ,366 vehicles per day if fully developed. This would generate between two and three vehicles per minute during peak hour entering and exiting to NE 4th Street. Limited site distance due to a vertical curve and heavy peak hour traffic volumes on NE 4th Street will cause all left turning movement to the property' s proposed access unsafe. Possible corrective solutions to this unsafe condition are as listed : 1 . Restrict all left turning movements by installing 'C ' curbing on the centerline of NE 4th Street. 2. Property owners fronting on NE 4th Street could pay for the installation of a center lane, two-way left turn. It would be desirable if property owners would dedicate 5 feet of property to facilitate the most desirable design width. 3. Regardless of corrective actions on NE 4th Street, an additional east/west roadway access for the two southerly properties must be required and provide access to Union Ave. NE as proposed on the attached drawing. As you are aware, a portion of the properties shown in the proposed right-a-way (60 ft. ) would have to be dedicated as a public street by each property owner. In addition to the east/west roadway access, we also confirm the need for a north/south roadway access to NE 4th Street to release properties to the south of the above-referenced property from being landlocked and improve traffic circulation throughout the area as developments occur. Please make the contents of this memo a part of the permanent records and any related future reports. 2 / CEM:ad cc: P. Lumbert ing been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and. I ' said zoning request being in conformity with the City's pjt°1 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly consi f dered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties hav- G ing been heard appearing in Affidavit of Publication support thereof or in opposi- tion thereto, NOW THERE- FORE Civ THE CITY COUNCIL OF I STATE OF WASHINGTON THE CITY OF RENTON, r COUNTY OF KING ss' j DAIN AS FOO OWS: OR- I SECTION I:The is following described property in thte II ...�J?,TI...�i., G`I,a.1..1?y being first duly sworn on rezoned o Bus ness Distr c I(B-1) as hereinbelow n oath,deposes and says that...S.h.eis the O.h.e i f...G i.erk of I ings,ied,subject to the eci I P Y ings, conclusions and deci- j THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) sion dated June 15, 1978 of times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and I the City's Hearing Examiner; has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred the Planning Director is to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- hereby authorized and di- paper published four (4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, ; reefed to change the maps and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained of the Zoning Ordinance,as at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton amended, to evidence said Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ; rezoning,to-wit: Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, F West 264 feet of the East 1300 feet of the North Ordinance 3236 ®ne — Quarter of the I Washington.That the annexed is a Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, as it was published in regular issues(and Washington. (Said pro- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period perty located on North- east 4th Street between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Avenue i of consecutive issues,commencing on the Northeast) AND SUBJECT FURTH- I • r - ;__--_-ER to that certain Declara ii - day of ,19 ,and ending the I 1 CITY OF RENTON, lion of Restrictive Coven- �� WASHINGTON ants executed by Petitioner ORDINANCE NO.3236 owner on or about July 5, dayof ,19.... both dates I (R 167-78) 1978, and recorded in the 11 AN ORDINANCE OF office of the Director of Re incl>�sive, and that su 1 40per was regularly distributed to its sub- THE CITY OF RENTON, cords and Elections Receiv- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee W A S H I N GI T O N ing No. 7807210772 and CHANGING THE ZON- which said convenants are charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..5:]..,.Q,2which I. ING CLASSIFICATION hereby incorporated and has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the OF CERTAIN PROPER- made a part hereof as if fully first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent , TIES WITHIN THE CITY set forth. insertion. OF RENTON. FROM SECTION II: This Ordi ' GENERAL CLASSIFI-. Hance shall be effective up- aeti p.L._ CATION DISTRICT (G) on its passage,approval and TO BUSINESS DIS- five(5)daysafferitspublica TRICT(B-1) tion. WHEREAS under Chap- PASSED BY THE CITY E•�lei•f •Gl•El"1ti ter7,TitlelV(BuildingRegu- COUNCIL THIS 7th day of cations) of Ordinance No. August, 1978. 1628 known as the"Code of Maxine E. Motor, Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of General Ordinances of the Deputy City Clerk ,City of Renton", as amend- APPROVED BY THE 19.... . ;ed, and the maps and re MAYOR THIS 7th Day of ••:augu'st 7$ ports adopted in conjunction August, 1978. .:. . I •-,. 1 herewith, a property Charles J. Delaurenti, A, i, �I . . erembelo the has Mayor v`+:,ti,4s, 0:',, '. Notary Publ n nd i the State of Washi ton, ;heretofore been zoned as APProved as to form: 3 `�" ' General Classification Dis- Lawrence J. Warren, ,;'.,,,a %.01 :4- residing at Kent, King,nty. I ,! • It (G);and City Attorney ;it°} "t._•� ;'' WHEREAS a proper peti- Published in The Renton '?8<:•` `' . " �:'' lion for change of zone Record-Chronicle August v P p 11, 1978. F15087. --J �'�?�Se Zegislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June classification of said ro er- �`..9Z.1f:; 955 QF`""(z` ty has been filed with the —•Weserrr:,Union Telegraph Co. rules for countingwords and figures, Planning Department on or j g P g about April 17,•1978 which adopted by the newspapers of the State. 'petition was duly referred to !the Hearing Examiner for • investigation, study and ' public hearing, and a public ;hearing having been held thereon on or about May 30, ' V.P.C.Form No.87 1978, and said matter hav- 1 ' i . ,'•:, i: ',.:-: , „ , ,,•-•,,,::.!;,:,:,-•, ;*,i,:•:;,,''.,' •-' 7 1.:,,,,.i , .. ' . •. , • '''::••'':;:':':'-‘,'• ',•-•• •,..":•' •-•"•7 s.:. -,v':, ,•...:=:,•:,,,..,t,iitS,,,:0, ACE PIKNIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE: „ , ,-- ! , - , , ,, ,•,•,„,,,, „, •• i ,- •,• ,• ,,,. • . , ,_ „ , , ,. . . e e'ee, e,, : , : e ':::e.'':' •'':': :'.''` ' '• '''.' :''' ''''''';;;;'•'''''''' '' .. ' ' • I . Filed for Record at Request of 1 : ::/.-,:.:„-.:-.-, !:,.,, , , .,,• -,..:''. '.: f„,,";•'., ••• '; , ,,.-. ' ,. ' , : -'-:;',,',':•-,. ;:f•r; ' . . .., ;-:,,.'•, •::,,' , ', . „. „ „, , . , .-'‘;-.. •-2-;.:: Name ,• . - . Address , . City and State . ,. . .. , • -:, Quit Clain.). Deed • . _ , , . . . . " .. , . . THE GRANTOR ARTHUR-D.., SWANSON , -.. :',.; :: ., . .., ,,,., • , . . . „ • . , for and in considers ion of -, ,• — : , • ,•,THE CITY OF RENTON conveys and quit claims to . . . „ • the following described real estate,situated in the County'Of:, .',.., . - . KING , . State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of,theigrantor(s) therein; - . The west 6 feet of the following deseribed-ptopetty: • ! . . . ••• . , West 264 feet of the east 1300 feet of North 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 16 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , 1es:s Fs',-.!aq• . , . . . ,.. .. , , . . • . . , . ...,. , . . . • • „ . .. . „ • . . , . 0tcd ...I...4. ' iN k,3k.:,C i_ -p C) •, ; 1 9 :V, , ( ' ' •, A.._... /t '-;:i ii,) ' - - . ,•-0(..Alt,i4-h/l/A , • I ,Individual) '.., : c....,:::' .- V.11.- ,,,_-,t......Q..25—„Cf.)....47-- ..4. . nr"--.. • B,,, : , 7 (Individual) • (President) , , . • . . By ' : , • '(Secretary) I . STATE OF WASHINGTON: ' . STATE OF WASHINGTON,' i': . . s-.4. COUNTY OF . Y,"A ss COUNTY OF On this day personally appeared before me On this . : . day of . • , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- , ' S.VVAA Qr. .c, ,'.4, '")-.^ ',Cc'•,-;\4'- 't-L . 5-',-/-?e'-'vie--Awl ington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individualiAescribed in and• • who executed the within and foregoing instrument, : and ,„ • , and acknowledged that --\\i.e..(... signed the same ' tO me known to be the ....::.:....;:.'::?-' •President and Secretary, -....7*-'. . as \AAA: r free arid voluntary act and deed, respectively,of : • .c.!•• •: :-.!i:,,, , .: for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. , : .the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the:free•and voluntary act and deed of said corpor- ation,,for.the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that . , ' ••'..' 1' --'-'"'"'•::--:::'-',--, '• ', ••:' , : l''..46"'•-,authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal , • GIVEN under my hand and ointrial'Aeal'':tht'S-:7:::::; ;,,:offiZedik0! OrpOiate seal of said cOrporation. •x:;--.)e*-day of VN.,,„)(v.)'IA ' ,i9 ''-'',!',• ; Witness my r hand and Official seal hereto affixed the day and year first .,, :,2.ape written. •IF,i1 .,::,-- -. ' .''' " • , .-... ' •,.,. -.,. ,. c\c`:?5,.V13_ IA ,. Vy• .:,44...'.:::- .,.-:1 ,:,,s.: ..- , . ','. ' :, , , Notary Public in and fOntha.‘.6,:tateotWaSb:,7:7.1:',..,:: :.: :. : ., i'. NOtiiry Public inand'fOr the State of Washington, ington, residing a \r„\--,."4A•k:.4!)-vil.. 2-,-,,, . '-'.;...,"'.::, :,' , ;,':;'::1:.:, ,40,0irg at", ,.. ',•': ' ' „ . , . ': ''" ' '...,..,.; ,::,,,,-',,,,' `".',•:.;': ",:,'..,.4:',': :f.::. :-;,!:•'..,:;','',':':''.- :, ':,'' :, ',, ' . ••,: ' ' • 1 : ' '::•'.'.:.;`;':.:.:0`,';•,')'''..:--''.i,:'.;:: ''' :;&`!:,,':f.'4i;:fi•!:::',(::,'''.:','; ,, :•-., : ::-'- : : . : '• ... : ' , ' • • ,,I,r M I 11/JZY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER illti,l (' HEARING: ARTHUR D. SWANSON, FILE NU_ ER R-167-78 1ILY :30 , 1978 PL.C1' THREE ; FAO So y �„y • M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map. and site map are attached. • N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. O. STAFF ANALYSIS: • • 1. The proposed B-1 zone -is not consistent with the comprehensive plan map element which ;designates the site and area within the powerlines easement as greenbelt. However, there is existing B-1 zoning east of the site, within the powerline easement and south of the site. 2. The Greenwood Cemetery is located west of the site. There is a 30 foot existing right lof way adjacent to the cemetery together with a 30± foot strip between that right lof way and the subject site. It appears that this strip of land was intended for use as a'future access street. This right of way must be assured to provide suitable access to the site and area to the south. 3. The intent of the comprehensive plan greenbelt designation was to establish a buffer, between the cemetery and future uses to the east. At the time the cre- hensive plan was adopted the powezline easement may have been considered a right of way owned by the power company, It appears that the plan was inaccurate in its • assessment of the necessity, amount, and exact location of greenbelt buffer areas. It is 'a fact that B-1 zoning surrounds the site directly to the south and east. This has an effect of limiting the effectiveness of a greenbelt on the subject site. It would appear that' a more appropriate buffer or transitional land use would have been a medium or low density multiple family designation. Suitable setbacks and landscape buffers can also be established as part of.rezoning, to correspond to • the spirit of the plan. Comprehensive Land Use Report, Objectives 1 and 2 page 17. • 4. The area along the north side of N.E. 4th Street is presently zoned and developed as B-11. • • 5. The need for a left turn lane along N.E. 4th should be studied and required as • • part of any rezone. 6. Given the amount' of traffic and' the potential for future widening of N.E. 4th Street, additional setbacks and lan_dscape/buffer should be provided along N.E. 4th • Street. (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, Objective 2, 4, and 6, page )7-18.) • •7. The Utilities Division has indicated that snit-::hlc sewer and water line extensions per the Comprehensive Utility plan'will be required as part of site development. • 8. There are a number of existing evergreen trees on the site. These should be retained as much as possible`as part Of site development and design. 9. Certain drainage problems in the area adjacent to the cemetery must be resolved as part of site development. • , • PLANNING DEPAR is PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING: ARTHUR D. SWANSON, FILE.NUMBER R-167-78 MAY 30, 1978 PAGE FOUR P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recomend approval of B-1 zone conditions in the form of restrictive covenants as follows. . 1. Provision of ad to ublic access to ci Watiferdy. �� P ty standards along the ezateriy edge of the subject site as part of site development. 2. Site development approval. Specific site development plans including site plan, landscape plan, building elevation design, and parking and circulation shall be reviewed and approved.by the Hearing Examiner. Z J a G he da ,a La c 3. Existing evergreen trees shall�be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design, development, and landscape plans. No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed landscape and open space plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site development review. • 4. All utilities shall be provided per Public Works Department approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of site development. 5. Provision of a minimum 30 foot landscaped setback/buffer along N.E. 4th Street. 6. Provision of a 20 foot landscaped setback/buffer along the westerly edge of the subject site. , . ... . . . Iii I i.•••1 -.,.. 1 '.. .1 1.•1 ,i ',•_1 i,[1 Li . '1:9 •\,,,,,7‘ri-; I 4: -T • ,I *-4-,, G-Tgoo .4,,,,I.,,,,...:43 ,..!. ,1,4,.. • z. •,,.... , 1,1 N E V. 811, , _.___ ,.,,I:...-'--L.j . I:I, .l,4'•Elti'l'il:!•J & i ' 1•11. ,i I,:Fri , 1 ! 1 --A r „..f. _ ..„ • I A 4. 8. 'S I"..!i-.T.. 7.: , ; [ 1,.•_, ow.t.pl.,7 • I., , . . 'AC VI • . 1.1 • j/, R I -. . . ...- ' --- r---?, tble....41.ula..•0., 1:. 1 ' : t.11 1. ,:: 4.! 6.44 ..'7 F.- r ' -' - .---- ,. N.Q.7,,,Pl.• 4 .. ...., 44,',. g ••:••••': / -'141,. . 4 ..'• .,. ,.., ,ll , -- . . lemanameK, ., ...,...•,. ft, ,,, .:.s . a.r „. ,, ,,i i . : : , 'IVNIVIIiiiiiii-. 17',:•.' t1. : " .J 1171-11'' '''''11 I, • . -7 .1 i''''•• ,,,'I. r -- , • ---- , . N••.4,,,.8 If A .,b,,, • i• 111 ,::j. 11,,,,-, : r......., _,...„ •. ,. g .t 1 . . al L . , . . .1 a ki N•LT..•I-- ••••••••11.• ••••1•••••••••. • ,. . . ., t , __ • Mr.I.jad..111 I I 1 SR-I 1 • ; , ii 1 i I : . kin. .4 ; ; '; ---' 71 I i -R-3 - . . • R-3 . . ... i 7 ----11, . (.7 ) I it : ‘ I . I i ' I . . -,. Es.,.: El' __L.... [ 2 Lor I . -1...."11 II . — Eli [ 1 _L_Li i B.. i z . ii BB c ; [ i , , , „ , 1 , ri 1 1 gi,, 7,4W° 5 , [ [ i I , 1 .1 _.._.... 1 _11L_ . .--1.-- ' ' E---4 To - - -- ,- ----b•11111,0110-. OP TOP •, N. ) ......L.--t.-r .. . , . I G I . . . I -,,r--1- / , .'‘,...\ 1 ,J.:. -- • 4--I -.._ GRE ENIW 00 a It— ' ': I morm G ,/ , I CE M r.._R Y I _____.. IP '' 161/47';........,.... . . .. , / I .. . • , . . 1 / ..') . I //../ co- • .,_._.._1 , I I- • _ _ _ . • , t i [, . C. D 1 1_ I. • ' I _____±1___ . --•- - . , 1 >- -' . ' I - -------- 4 . . ' . I I . i I I I --. II l______— I - - - I h-- . , , , T , , 7. • ii , , 1 1, • . ' P ! . . I . 1 . . ) r" • !LI_. ,17;T:',, ... „ „'„,.: , ' '.. 1 : I • . 1 1 :,It r, , ;. :.......14"`.. •• 9, e• ,[[, [ ,‘' #„ I . t 1 ... •.''. ---;'. ''');01fr '...-`. -[[•,..'‘.[.:,:' . . : 1 . . . IF,,.„, , " . ..,•[....,;...,;•.' , ,. •' it*„ . , 1 , i •r,„...,•,,-.:,:•0."..-‘• ..., •• • . 1 .. t• -, ,, • [ i 1 •,±•-, -T1TE ---ts.1-,, [ .• ,,,.• . . • • i . ., ...,-•,'•• .1,..*), • , ,, ,, - , .,\, , • [ • I . .:.',Lt...'• • • ' 1 s' • ,,..,''!'„.•••[ .,',"-, i. • . i . c____,----- ''.,,-.':::' 9'.•-"''. .I, '.1 t•, [ F77-7\#-... , ,..:' .,3 " .` .''' - • . . . . , ,• [ . . . [ . . .. . . [ . • . • . , [ i .•. . . 1 APPLICANT TOTAL AREA • i - f PRINCIPAL ACCESS • . •i . . . E XI SI I NG ZONING . . . I • EXISTING USE I PROPOSED USE . . • . . . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . . , .._ . .. . • . . COMMENTS ,[ . • _. . . . . . • . [ . • . . . . . . ... •. . , ._ . . ...,_ ‘,... , . . 1(0 -1 1? V \ ( \ N I T --d i''' \r'-- (\11 1 m -.)i i . . • 1 i L I - . . .. . . • . , 4 T 1 ST r.1.•,,,i.z•,:;,•!;::: .4.-4 f`"•:4'. .,.,: 1 ' I my .. ' itik-77.7i&A A. , AUT 13A 14 44 f r3 ' . , g,1 I . , 1,„ • /.. R3 #c„ i kii, ! , _. .. ; .... I .. il .1 • . 4 ke.T. 40 . . i fert , I . . . I a34, 2.2.0-40gAsit.47 ir r4 MARVIN D. il la r: \NE-44c2PA40 7 CARL SMITli• ' • 43 1.\Z ACRE- •, Iiiimrrin,,'sz.-7.4.!. I°, .,-f.:1'c.•;;,',:::,-,.:,..-:r-2-'.3..-2.--624:::,,,,,,,.,„,-,-,,„:.•.„,,:-„.,-, 4,.. 1.......-4, .'poodihgliler.' -1;.!Idw--'4.644Ziiiit.WAVAigai:X440 akii `, ,,,. , .5 7-0 A/ 43 7 '244 Ca.( OF IdEtt ToN 1. • IP.L. NUN Pt i ' k I . . EA I! N , • 4, ... . • kki ko . . v.3 i ,,,, ' ,t, 1 lc )1/-1:::'-i RECEIVED v?h\A ,..,, N . 1 . I APR 17 1978 . • • 1 Sc..ALE. i "-4 2.0 o _ \\..,,.. ............. '1-4 - " _ , .a . .. , ; ---__..„,........_2: „,,,1-• o''' 1 . . • , . -- . . • . . _. .... .... ...____ _,...... ,,.... - . . i • :/ . . . , . • . . . , • . . ., - • ;., :1 • ‘ . " . .. , • I „ . ..- . . - . V • . , 11 . • .. . . .- . . .' • . . ... . - . .. .. . . . . . .. , . . , . . . . . .,...-; • • . , • • . ... . . , •• . . , . . . • 4 ,• . . ,. . . . . . _ ... , ,:,; ! :. - - • . . - - . . • ,. . . R-167-78; Arth Swanson Rezone/o//n/// /A4/J //////4 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CD WHEREAS, Arthur D. Swanson and his wife Paula K. Swanson are the owners of M2 the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of CD Washington: e-1 r-N The West 264 feet of the East 1300 feet of the North 1/4 of the Northeast CD Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range ti5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. La WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter known as "the 0 p property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; co N I NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: ACCESS The westerly six feet of the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for public right-of-way. The owners of the above described property, their successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or City-initiated proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements of any street ptoposed along the westerly portion of the property. Access to the property shall be, if possible, to and from any street constructed along the westerly portion of the property, provided such street is available for access. LANDSCAPING The westerly twenty (20) feet, exclusive of the above described public right-of-way, shall be a landscaped buffer area wherein existing vegetation shall be retained and additional vegetation planted as specified and approved by the Planning Department, City of Renton. JUL-2--73 0 0 i . .1 ?��;�� f','2 i t�.uu o . .�.''�; �'p r�� rr�vi~. l�11h1�1f?r'�'%.ac..';, � ._.... SWANSON - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - R-16.7-78 -2- The northerly thirty (30) feet of the property shall be a landscaped area wherein4existing substantial trees shall be retained. As many as possible of the existing trees on the property shall be retained. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion (�J of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by N NO Ordinance's of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. O OAny violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforce- ment proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. L ti Arthur D. Swanson Paula K. Swanson STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this ? day of ..S , 19-ACi, before me personally appeared Arthur D. Swanson and Paula i(. Swanson, the persons who executed the within' and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. i• ,Y s . j,I�r Notary Public in and for the State ��• +, y of Washington, residing in PO:4 m • • „ x o THE CITY OF RENTON V �� VI MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 op •�• e CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O O rQ L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 ,p�TED SEP1C-*- August' 21, 1978 • Mr. Arthur D. Swanson 4512 Talbot Road S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-167-78; Arthur D. Swanson Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Swanson: This is. to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of August 7, 1978, by adoption of Ordinance No. 3236. Sincer'e3 , L. Rick eeler Hearing Examiner cc: jity Clerk. Planning Department OF 1R , • o THE CITY OF RENTON U z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n oil CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0A 43• CITY CLERK 09gT�D SEP.T°4 � August 9 , 1978 • • Mr. Arthur D. Swanson 4512 ` albot Road South Renton, Washington 98055 • RE: Rezone #R-:167-78 Dear Mro Swanson: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, August 7, 1978 has adopted Ordinance 43236. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, • CITY OF RENTON ' yabteb6027ea Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb • Enclosure Renton City Council 8/7/78 Page 3 Audience Comment AUDIENCE COMMENT State Highway Glen Garrett, 1006 So. 30th Ct. , inquired when comments from State Dept. Report ! Highway Dept. would be available, being advised they should be ready within a week. Dennis Stremick, 2532 Smithers Ave. So. , inquired as to city's response to State Highway report. Councilwoman Shinpoch advised of those corrections-improvements to be made within the city limits in the area of VictorialPark. OLD BUSINESS Acquisition of MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO REFER MATTERS OF PETERMEYER PROPERTY . Property on ON MILL AVE. SO. TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilwoman Thorpe Mill Ave. So... inquired re public hearing for acquisition of this property for public use. Councilman Shane noted previous council action to acquire civic center property. . Councilwoman" Thorpe requested Administration to research and verify that the proper procedures have been followed to acquire property and report to the Ways and Means Committee. CARRIED. (See also consent agenda) Planning & Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented report Development recommending the Council take no further action on the subject of Committee Report proposed L-2 .zone at this time, pending review and recommendations Proposed L-2 Zone to be made by the Planning Commission later on this year. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Airport Director Councilman Stredicke requested for the record that he is not, has Postion not been, and has no intent to be a candidate for airport director even though it was offered. Terms of Motion by Shane that elected officials cannot serve more than two Office consecutive terms. Attorney explained that length of terms are set by State law. Shane requested research into this matter. Mayor's Motion by Shane that the Mayor should have the right to hire and fire Appointments directors of departments without the concurrence of the council . Attorney explained council concurrence required for hiring. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3235 Ways and Means Committee Chairman recommended second and final readings SCS Holdings, Ltd. of Ordinance of SCS Holdings, Ltd. Rezone changing the zoning classi'fi- Rezone Ordinance, cation of certain properties within the City of. Renton from Residence District (R-1) to Residence District (R-3) . Following discussion, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All Ayes. CARRIED. rdinan Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final readings of wanson ezone. Swanson Rezone (R-167-78) changing the zoning classification of certain R-167-78 properties with the City of. Renton from General. Classification District (G) 'to Business District (B-1) . MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All Ayes. CARRIED. v Stone R-165-78/ Ways and Means Committee recommended Stanley E. Stone and Marvin D. Wehrman R-166-78 Wehrman Rezones be referred to the Administration for review of Rezones dedication of right-of-way and report back next week. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN- COMMITTEE" RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Ordinance #3237 Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of special Senior Citizen garbage collection rates for certain qualified senior citizens. MOVED Special Garbage BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Collection Rates Ways and Means Committee'report recommended second and final readings of Ordinance of the City relating to special garbage collection rates for Renton City Council 8/7/78 Page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions -. Cont. Ordinance #3237 certain qualified senior citizens. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE Continued TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All Ayes. CARRIED. Ordinance #3238 Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of special Senior Citizens water rates for qualified senior citizens. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND Special Utility THORPE TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND 'FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Ways and Rates Means Committee report recommended second and final readings of ordinance of the City amending Secion 3-231 (B) of Title III (Departments) of ordinance No. 1628 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" relating to special water rates for qualified senior citizens. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call : All Ayes. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to all Council Members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion (adopting motion follows agenda items). From July 24, 1978 Consent Agenda: Cedar River Trail Request from Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, to accept comple- System, Phase I tion of Cedar River Trail System, Phase I CAG 082-77 by Sun-Up Project Comple- Construction, Inc. recommending Council accept completion of the tion contract as of July 24, 1978 recommending, if after thirty days, no - liens or claims are filed against the project and proof of payment of tax liabilities is received that the retained amount of $17,809.15 be paid to the contractor. Concur. Appointment of Letter from Mayor Delaurenti recommended appointment of Mr. Louie Part-Time Gebenini as part-time Airport Director for the City. Refer to Airport Director Ways and Means Committee. Certification Letter from W.A. Bulley, Secretary of Transportation, re certification of State Highway of Washington State Department of Transportation covering the descrip- Routes tions of State Highway Routes within Corporate limits of Renton. Refer to Public Works Director. (See later referral to Transportation Committee. ) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PREPARED. CARRIED. State Highway MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM TO RECONSIDER CERTIFICATION OF STATE Routes HIGHWAY ROUTES FROM JULY 24, 1978 CONSENT ITEMS. CARRIED. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND THORPE TO REFER TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Current Consent Items: MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA: REQUEST TO SIGN CERTIFICATION OF METRO SEWER EXTENSIONS & CONNECTIONS & PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY ON MILL AVE. SO. CARRIED. METRO Sewer Letter from Public Works Director Warren Gonnason recommending referral Connections and of METRO Resolution 2933 re METRO sewer connections and extensions Extensions be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution and authori- zation of signature of certification. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHANE TO REFER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Acquisition of Council ,is advised that agreement has been reached for acquisition of Property on , the Petermeyer property on Mill Ave. South. Refer to Ways and Means Mill Ave. So. Committee for resolution re appropriation of necessary funds. (See previous discussion Page 3, Old Business. ) Appointment of Letters from Mayor Delaurenti appointing Robert P. Deines (effective Firefighters August 16, 1978) and William Scott Brewster as Firefighters in the Renton Fire Department. Confirmed. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ORDINANCE NO.' 3236 (R-167-70) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) (R367-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) 'of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been, filed with the Planning Department on or about April 17, 1978 which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 30, 1978, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner andhsaid zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE ' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1)as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated ' June 15, 1978 of the City's Hearing Examiner; the Planning Director ip hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning • Ordinance,.as amended, to evidence sai'd rezoning, to-wit: Weet 264 feet of the East1300 feet of the • North Ohe - Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Nortieast Quarter of. Section 16, Township, 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington (Said property located on Northeast 4th Street between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Avenue Northeast) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owner on or about July 5, 1978, and recorded in the office 'of the Director of Records and Elections Receiving No. 7807210772 and which said covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 7th day of August, 1978. Maxine E. Motor, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS 7th Day of August, 1978. C Charles . Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: _ Lawrence J. Wa ren, City Attorney Date of Publication: August 11, 1978 t p t ❑1 � I 1Na 1 Q � � I I 0 IC UN10 .. . M • 0 ® a s , I ❑ �` if U 1 t1fta W i 'I 0 V j tO a !ob£ �' it °hoohED U Iv~c W it It ii It t I J'�� it o6Lc ti_.! if it •S ,i 11 / II • 27 n f/ o/ PO f/ II ft 11 �pErg IA I 1. ems. .. ....... row.r.r.trzt!,:ii... ,...:::::::tim." ...c.:41)...i.-votzs...4:-27...:17:::::::g 63....,46....s.:::„., ‘jvat.9 _ :E l',.._ I • -‘ pF R � a 41 ri �. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z t' `..rtt�l'Y' k O �' � CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD CITY CLERK �4TfD SEPZ-�� August 7 , 1978 • • • Mr. Arthur D. Swanson • 4512 Talbot Road South Renton , Washington ' 98055 REc .oneR78 estrictive Covenants Rezone Dear Mr. Swanson : We enclose herewith one copy of the above'-mentioned restrictive covenants which have been recorded with King County Records and Elections . Thank you for your prompt remittance of the recording fees' in the amount of $4 . 00. Yours very truly , • CITY OF RENTON Maxine E.' Motor • Deputy City Clerk MM : jeb • Enclosure 4 OF RE .► . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z o o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER /A 0. q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0,94TEo SEPZ - 1.O July 27, 1978 TO: Members, Renton City Council FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Rezone, Applications: Stone (R-165-78) , Wehrman (R-166-78) , and Swanson (R-167-78) In response to your referral of July 24, 1978 and the July 26, 1978 memorandum from Councilman Stredicke (attached) , I have reviewed the record on these three applications. Access to these properties is only a problem for the Stone property. The Swanson property has rights of access to N.E. 4th Street, and the rezone required dedication of the westerly approximate six feet for part of the right-of-way for the road adjacent to the cemetery. With the dedication of the south 30 feet of the Wehrman property and the city's committed north 30 feet of the abutting,property, sufficient access exists for that property to the easterly border of the Stone property. Mr. Stone's property is the only one of the three applications without sufficient access. The comprehensive view of access for properties in the area was not entered into the record by the Public Works Department Traffic Division. However, the Planning Department provided a recommendation that the 60-foot roadway from the Wehrman property extend across the entire Stone property. This indicated that some comprehensive review had occurred by that department of the traffic circulation in the area. However, nothing formal with support or participation by the Traffic Division was provided the Examiner in the hearing on the Stone rezone application or in the subsequent responses requested by the Examiner. Therefore, the Examiner considered the recommendation for dedication of the north 30 feet of the Stone property as not completely researched, reviewed or coordinated with the Traffic Division (based upon the record) to make a specific requirement for that dedication. The condition the Examiner recommended in the Stone application was for acceptable access to be provided, thereby putting the burden upon the applicant to submit a means of access acceptable to staff. This access could take the form of dedication. of the north 30 feet of Mr. Stone's property or dedication of another alignment in cooperation with the northerly abutting property (the site of the proposed large apartment complex) . Either alternative could meet the east-west access recommendation of staff. It appeared at the time that, 1) the applicant would be more able to select one of the alternatives with the assistance of staff in coordination with the abutting northern property owner, and 2) the Traffic Division should have another opportunity for a comprehensive view of the access for the area. Whatever access staff reached a consensus on was acceptable to the Examiner; however, the Examiner did not wish to hinder this cooperative decision by dictating the location of the access without more complete information entered into the record. Members, Renton City Council Page Two • July 27, 1978 • • Per the memorandum of July 26, 1978, from Councilman Stredicke, another area of concern was the status of the right-of-way abutting the cemetery property and the Swanson property. The record in the public hearing was that a 30-foot public right-of-way exists abutting the easterly boundary of the cemetery property, although this is being contested in litigation. Staff supported making this a 60-foot dedicated public street for access serving the properties from N.E. 4th Street to the Leisure Estates Mobile . Home. Park. This appeared reasonable, logical and warranted. But upon examination of the 60 feet of property between the cemetery and' Mr. Swanson's property, it was discovered in the public hearing that Mr. Swanson did not own all of . what would be the easterly 30 feet of the needed 60-foot right-of-way.. Another .person owned approximately 24 feet of this easterly 30 feet of right-of-way.. Mr. Swanson could only dedicate six feet (westerly approximate six feet of his property) . Therefore, this was required of Mr. Swanson with full knowledge that the city would probably have to condemn the intervening 24 feet of property in order to develop a full 60-foot public street. • I hope this answers your questions regarding these three applications. Please contact ' me if you desire further explanation. Aft L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: . Planning Department • • • MEMORANDUM July 26 , 1978. • From: Richard :4. Stredicke To: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner The Ways and Means Committee has reviewed your reports and proposed proposed ordinances rezoning properties in East Renton in accordance . . with 'recommendations from your office. • However, ' the committee has not reported the ordinances out for final reading because of discussion regarding the dedication of right-of-way. and establishment of roadways to properly serve the area between the cemetary and Union Avenue N.E . The committee has been concerned about granting a zoning on properties which' appear to,be '"land locked" to . higher, density multiple, even though there are no building permits . involved. • The proposed concentration of vehicles in that area would dictate establishment of roadways BEFORE anything is done in the .area and that either roadway right-of-way is dedicated by property owners or the city ' proceed to condemn that area which would be required. There was also some concern about. "dumping" a high volume of inter- for traffic onto either Union Avenue N.E. or N.E. Fourth St. • The interior property, in fact , lists the dedication of 30 ' of the • south property.-line, when 30 ' of the NORTH property would line up With that proposed in the eastern rezone request. Because of this concern, the committee had asked 'the Planning Depart- ment to' make : a report this past Monday. It appears that the depart- • ment 's recommendations did cover this problem, but the examiner's report failed to consider or include them. Were they omitted in • error or could we have some explanation? • Otherwise, the committee will be remanding all three parcels back to your office for further consideration. • Subject applications are : No . R-165-78 , Stone No. R-166-78 , Wehrman • No. R-167-78, Swanson It is also my personal concern when a six foot ' strip is talked about for roadway purposes oh the piece abutting N.E. 4th, when no Other • property has been dedicated for right-of-way. (A six-foot wide road?) l a • ii 1( I)E1'ARTMEN`J ,,j,1141IJIj'Y REPORT 'l'0 HEARING EXAMINER illii, l (' HEARING: ARTHUR D, SWANSON, FILE,'.UMJ3ER R-167-78 Iti.Y 30 , 1978 THREE • %/*13/i4k) $4216 M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: - • A vicinity map. and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: • 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City, of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City, of Renton Fire Department. 0. STAFF ANALYSIS: • • • 1. The proposed B-1 zone is not consistent with the camprehensive plan map element which ,designates the site and area within the powerlines easement as greenbelt. However, there is existing B-1 zoning east of the•site, within the powerline • easement and south of the site. 2. The Greenwood Cemetery is located west of the site. There is a 30 foot existing right of way adjacent to the cemetery together with a 30± foot strip between that right ,of way and the subject site. It appears that this strip of land was intended for use as a'future access street. This 'right of way must be assured to provide suitable access to the site and area to the south. 3. The intent of the caiprehensive plan greenbelt designation was to.establish a buffer between the cemetery and future uses to the east. At the tine the corrpre- hensive plan was adopted the powerline easement may have been considered a right of way owned by the power company, It appears that the plan was inaccurate in its - assessment of the necessity, amount, and exact location of greenbelt buffer areas. It is a fact that B-1 zoning surrounds the site directly to the south and east. This has an effect Of limiting the effectiveness of a greenbelt on the .subject site. It would appear that a more appropriate buffer or transitional land use would have been a medium or low density multiple family designation. ' Suitable setbacks and landscape buffers can also be established as part of:rezoning, to correspond to the spirit of the plan. Comprehensive Land Use Report, Objectives 1 and 2 page 17. 4. The area along the north side of N.E. 4th Street is presently zoned and developed as B-1. • 5. The need for a left turn lane along N.E. 4th should be studied and required as part of any rezone. 6. Given the amount of traffic and the potential for future widening of N.E. 4th Street,, additional setbacks and landscape/buffer should be provided along N.E. 4th Street. (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, Objective- 2, 4, and 6, page 17-18.) 7. The Utilities Division has indicated that ral t-nhle sewer and water line extensions per the Comprehensive Utility plan will be required as part of site development. 8, There are a number of existing evergreen trees on the site. These should be retained as much as possible as part of site develont and design. 9. Certain drainage problems in the area adjacent to the cemetery must be resolved as part of site development. PIJ\NNING DEPAR I I PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ARTHUR D. SWANSON, FILE NUMBER R-167-78 MAY 30, 1978 PAGE FOUR P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recuirund approval of B-1 zone conditions in the form of restrictive covenants as follows;: 1. W2sit-c �� Provision of adequate public access to city standards along the s� edge of the; subject site as part of site development. 2. Site development approval. Specific site development plans including site plan, landscape plan, building elevation design, and parking and circulation shall be reviewed and approved.by the Hearing Examiner. ZI `.�elop,,, Lo.t Vat w1KIW s. 3. Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design, development, and landscape plans. No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed landscape and open space plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. All utilities shall be provided per Public Works Department approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of site development. 5. Provision of a minimum 30 foot landscaped setback/buffer along N.E. 4th Street. 6. Provision of a 20 foot landscaped setback/buffer along the westerly edge of the subject site. , • ' ._ ,. . 1 ., ..- . k. -14,',--:‘,/,:, ' ••Jo I I . , . . ,..4.,.'..-1 *--;.- ' .'._. , , I 4,i. I' 1 i'..L.,1_1 • i , ,s-- "" ' nt w • N'T •,". ..., .1, !.....,•,:, i .•14...t. _0. ‘• t I • N E •',. T. ...- • I • .• .. ..., 1..... . J • ..L'''°'!:7 I- .i 4,,i,--,; 1---- i _ , ,4.Q.17114 1.1.• 0 il c+,,,,,Ar..s. g :-,:7/ .;,''... „:4 z-'' •. ,,,,• .,? , ......_ . I . '..'1: i-,:ki iLl'i t;':Xi... N 4. .' 1,;,,-;), -----j I--, 0'''1(•,•••.. ":-'1 I of-r-"..77-N..4 .._,•,.4 ; r . L...A:I[ 1...:- . i.,...-' ;.. • ,.. .. 1, --•_. --7 -, l' C.r_ti ,,, 14 im .:-.- 1... -- •t------ -- , N.II.A T.,Pt.. N.I.IM4 • - -•.4 1 i:-1' ,1 _I! i . I+A ' :••:;•1 '1 i i:i'' -•1-'1:' • • •• ' :'•" 7 •••_ -' It 1 ,.....1-7.-ill 3.....".•_,,,. •A •). . . : 7; 2 .; ::. 447. .1•,.,:,,.J.4. '' ...I . - _!, ,i, i ...N.. . T4 lanr. . • 1.1.m.••••• 000TmTorij _. 17_ l• . ___ . I 1 I . .1_ . . • , 11. l• 11-.1 , i Sf .I 1 _ 1 i . . .. ..... : N ' .....I--f— - .__ GS i . ugH 1 . . . ., 1.0•0 is..,., MP • R-3 1 Ev; 1 . M. ...1 ict , ,I 1 I z • il , I sal -,yr . , . • „,,, , I II; I _. ____, ___ 1, --E--4" .-- .We, • . 11.- ---............ ...1.1P ---- • N., ... , T F G I I:' -- i G vii-1 • / L GREENWOOD .''.. I 01— . , . • _______ ,,, „ 1 . , op CEM " RY - .._ . bl E w• I • r.3 4/ i %") . I :' • ;t•N' .N • II i ' I . ii.„1../ . 0 \ .. ., . ., •- 1 4 , I I • ' _ __... 1 • I i 1 _ -----54- I 4 I . 4,.. _, I • . . 1 _______ _I I 1 . . I — I I I I : •.' .: •--:' 1 G 1 I T .. . . . . , . , Ls...R1 r_.!___ . . 1_. _. __, 1 . _ . 1 : •• i 1 i I . . 7 __•_ . . .., , i • ,... .., ...,.4..... ... i i I 1 . . I I • • • • ''' I ' 0 I I I • I I i:I's;:.:::::,..-;r-2:4):1!•:::7,...9. , _.1.' .0,,,,,,,± ,1 s, ., 1 I I ' I • • ' . / .,+•00' . u•+ 4 . ,.1.t.''--.,..• i.: . • I ; . I t j'' .-;..,•', 9`, ,' .0 •I 4 ' .1,1,01't.i•i. , 1 •.'.C: ,."''''''' • n'' i. i • I .r--7- ,.. . ,.,,'• . In 4. 00 ,‘ . I -`•.! ; . • . • • .. . .... . . •. . . . ' • APPLICANT TOTAL AREA I ; . I PR INC I PAL ACCESS 1 I _ ' EXIS1 ING ZONING - 1 . . . . ' EXISTING USE I USE PROPOSED . . • . • . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . . , I . • , . t • COMMENTS i . . . . . . . • . . I . , . . . I- • . . • . .,. , .. . . _.... . , , .. . , , , , • CT T') -1 V \ C. \ N \ -fl i C\I\ Ai- ) I III _ � • . 1 , • • . 1 TN I 4 t ST _ 4 TI I UNION CZ 1 /. / 1/oA b ! I AUT. F3Autt f it...3 sv/��s✓s o k/ N, I � GIIE • 4 1CF i— Q Iir V MARV1N D. si r W6uarr414 CARL SMITH • ., '—..dit�:.i ' ..r„ • a t a SToA/6 rr, 11t Jy7 '� 4.7 j CITY OF 1GF.41 Tory 1 P.L- NUN N kp,"4 zov h I ,,17 - RECEIVED oA : I 4K1 1‘, I f APR 17 1978 • I - _____ `11-c3 .�.._.� .X. S C.-A L E 1 - Z o o S :1 \, \��; DEp p.R \ • • ✓ ' „,, .. J . { • r1/1 I AhE 1----\ \ •,,,,, 1 \ s•„: \ • 1 :: , i 1,... \ \ : tg I NM LAI 1.1.)\ • `,„\\\, \s\ , , i- 11111Effil $ cur® 0 HN ii LI ;1;01 {. IIEIJIJIIILII o ' a -: ,):, : ' iiiElosl.s.8.Y:61e4N1 i I • 0 4:, , • . i , ..i 4 0 ,, . ,c,t. ,;,,, • • , CAI& cin I Pal 0 % •},� iw_rnsiff ifw•0i! :efti>`4#14>`iml.14fnmI ' Nia.\n p IrekV;7 17 41 ib lb.:vimmin.lowm i s. 0 O ! v + ,.\\' (zoPosF.3) S'iQc-QT I 43 `� c -- �r 7� `j� GTE e# RENt fY j P.L Au ILI 1173 � A A 3•I3Ac LJ ILI1.4• P` 1 7 R� .0 MP 1:Cil ... �. 1 ...I MIMI A L.6 42 r SMS.11 ' 414)E s- SPari60 .� — ID I6C:.•51 ...7 ^C7 [_ PARK 5 GKAob e.cie N A l ` 4T-1 REN-rcei• W ^ — I I. z; t 6g1.2 '9 ? -- ammo L] 0 I I ii . Di a. o. D rzi M I= iI 1 C. i II II GALE: 200 =Su (IE C r tSzvt.1E \ 4 • Renton City, Council 1 . 7/.17/78 Page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions Con't:`:. ? . First Reading Ways and Means:;:Comni ttee'.:recomended. f i rst-`•reading of the CHG CHG International International;,Rezone R-129-78, from'GS 1; R .1 and:S-1 to B-1, Rezone R-3 •and„ R. 22-. MOVED BY STREDICKE, ''SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK • :TO WAYS AND':...MEANS':COMMITTEE: i'CARRIED.:::' First Reading Ways: and..Means:,',Commi ttee•recorrmendedo fi r-st reading. of the Stanley Stanley E. Stone E. Stone;' Rezone: R=165,78, ,G to ,R-3: .Rezone „ ;. First Reading Ways and Means 'Committee recommended first reading of the Marvin D. Marvin D.: Wehrma'n Wehrman Rezone R-166-78, G to B :.1. Rezone ;; , of Ar thur',firre ading th re commended d sty t e e ormie e n mmi to •r c and>=�:Means s �.Co Ways, e First Reading ) y Arthur D. Swanson Swanson:Rezone'R 167;T78., �G: to:B'.1 '. Rezone - f; Councilman Stred:i:'cke requested' presentati'on,by Planning Director Ericksen of area maps indicating;connection of the streets, if and when•'they:were'-''dedtcated: MOVED 'BY :STREDICKE 'SECOND SHANE TO REFER REZONES :BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE''FOR.ONE WEEK. `CARRIED. ,yr Aerial Map - Upon request':regard ng%new city� aerial map., Planning Director :: .Council Chambers Ericksen displayed new map being prepared for the Council Chambers. Resolution #2199: Resolution 'was':read .'fi:xing datei:,of'Augus.t,721,, 1978 for public hearing ;".' NE 14th St. on the proposed vaca'tio'n: .of: a° portion: of NE;,14th-:St.`(Vac 6-78), _7acation-Public petitioned by. Hazel Chenaur et a1..,: MOVED->BY '.STREDICKE, SECOND Hearing 8/21/78 CLYMER TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #22001 Resolution: was :'read fixing date' ofAugust 28; 1978 for public hearing NW 3rd St. on the proposed, vacation of ,a portion ofNW '3rd St.(Vac 5-78), Vacation - Public petitioned by Robin/Barbara Little et al . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Hearing 8/28/78 'CLYMER TO ADOPT,,:THE RESOLUTION°'AS:`'READ.=:"CARRIED. . CONSENT AGENDA The followi:ng,ltems are distributed' to all "Council Members and , adopted: by one motion without''separate• dis`cusstOn.': (adopting motion ' follows:agenda items),. . „Glacier Park Hearing-Exami.ner.:-submitted ,File:. NO. FP-'176=78',Final Plat for Company Final Glacier Park Company - Orill'ia Industrial. Park :Division No. 1 Plat: Refer to Ways. and Means Committee';for proper resolution Senior Citizens' July 12, 1978, bid'opening,::: three?bids received;`. Senior.Citizens' Center Watermain Center Waterman Project: .: Refer „ta:. Senior ,Center Building Advisory Project Committee ; 'Pl anni nq, 'Dept: , Public Works Dept.-, Utilities Comni ttee, and Communi-ty Services`Comm.ittee's:°: (See attached tabulation) Settlement of Request .from Gwen. 'Marshall ,` Finance,. Director, for: transfer of. funds Discrimination re settlement of. discrimination: suit. . Refer to=Ways and Means' Suit Committee for proper resolution. Name Change Washington Natural:':.Gas Company,''.a':Delaware,'Corpor'ation, notification Washington of name change"'and 'request'.of;Council, far..'transfer and Assignment of Natural Gas Franchise to Washington Energy Company, a .Washington Corporation, refer to Ways and Means Committee and City Attorney for proper._legislation. Dean .W. Bitney Hearing Examiner's:;:recommendation'.re' Bitney.,''.Rezone R-179-78 re , Rezone additional RtimeAending Planning''Commission determination of;,::: Comprehensive.-Land:,Use designation: ;..'Referto .Planning Commission for recommendat.ion'`. Approval of MOVED':BY;°CLYMER ;SECOND PERRY; COU CIL::ADOPT;THE:CONSENT AGENDA Consent'Agenda AS'PREPARED.": CARRIED. ' iPd WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JULY 17 , 1978 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second , and final reading: SCS Holdings, Ltd. Rezone The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: CEG •International Rezone Stanley E. Stone Rezone ,>Arthur ,D. . Swanson Rezone Marvin D. Wehrman Rezone The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for' adoption:, NE 14 St. = Street Vacation - Setting Public Hearing date of August 21, 1978 NW 3rd St. - . Street Vacation - Setting PUblic Hearing date of August ,28 , 1978 4giA `' 4`►' Ric' : Stredicke, Chairman CQ9t�are.b � Barbara Shinpoch Geor"g P e y e R-167-78; Ar D. Swanson Rezone - DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arthur D. Swanson and his wife Paula K. Swanson are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of • Washington: The West 264 feet of the East 1300 feet of the North 1/4 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter known as "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, • heirs and assigns, as follows: ACCESS The westerly six feet of the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for public right-of-way. The owners of the above described property, their successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in; sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or City-initiated proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements of any street ptoposed along the westerly portion of the property. Access to the property shall be, if possible, to and from any street constructed along the westerly portion of the property, provided such street is available for access. LANDSCAPING The westerly twenty (20) feet, exclusive of the above described public right-of-way, shall be a landscaped buffer area wherein existing vegetation shall be retained and additional vegetation planted as specified and approved by the Planning Department, City of Renton. P ti` -2- The northerly thirty (30) feet of the property shall be a landscaped area • • wherein existing substantial trees shall be retained. As many as possible of the existing trees on the property shall be retained. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforce- ment proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Arthur D. Swanson Qom+ 1 Ca .• Sc ci�Z32 S� - Paula K. Swanson STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this n - day of :al , 19•"1 , before me personally appeared Arthur D. Swanson and Paula k. Swanson, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and,deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • Notary Public in and for the State ' • 11 of Washington, residing in Rev al, . 1 i I.\' Renton City Council 7/10/78 Page ,4 Consent Agenda - Cont. Bid Openings: 1978 Asphalt June 23, 1978 bid opening, four bids received, 1978 Asphalt. Resurfacing Resurfacing. Refer to Transportation Committee and Public Works Department. LID #284 July 5, 1978 bid opening, two bids received;. LID' #284, Sanitary Sanitary Sewers Sewers, Jones Ave. NE. Refer to: Public Works Department and Utilities Committee Rezones:,. CHG International C:H..G International request for rezone, 'R-129-78, GS-1 to R-3; R-1 to R-3; S-1 to B-1. Hardie SE between Sunset Blvd. W.- and BN R/W. Refer to Ways and Means. Committee Stanley E. Stone Stanley E. Stone request for rezone, R-165-78, G to R-3.':, .NE 4th St between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.' Marvin D. Wehrman Marvin D. .Wehrman request for rezone, R=166-78, G.to B-1, NE 4th St. between Greenwood Cemetery,and Union Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. • :•;:- < `. .' `. Arthur D. Swanson Arthur D. Swanson request for rezone, :R-167-78" , G to B-1 NE 4th St. between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. SCS Holdings SCS Holdings, Ltd. request for .rezone,,;R-17,7`-78, R-1 to R-3, property at 4.17 Wells Ave: South. 'Refer :to Ways and Means Committee. Planning Dept. Councilman Stredicke requested information be presented next presan+a+;nn Monday by the Planning Department re requests for. rezones Re u by Stone, Wehrman, and Swanson. Mayor. advised City Clerk to; notify Planning Department. . Street Vacation Petition for street vacation portion of`'NE "14th Street, West' of NE 14th Street Edmonds Ave. NE filed by Michael M.. Hani.s.. Refer to Public Works Dept. for validation of petition and recommendation as to appraisal ; to the Board of Public Works for recommendation re retention of utility easements; to the Transportation Committee, to the City Attorney for resolution setting date of August 21, 1978 for public hearing. Claim for Claim for damages was filed by Gloria Kay Jacobs, alleging damage Damages by breakage of water main. ' Refer to City Attorney and Insurance ., Carrier, Appointment of Letter from Earl Clymer, as Acting'Mayor,',recommended appointment of. Police Officer Dennis Eugene Gerber as a police office in the Renton Police Department effective July 16, 1978. Senior Citizens June 30, 1978 bid opening, two bids received; Senior Citizens Center. Bid Opening Construction. Refer to Mayors Advisory Building Committee. 1949 Easement Public Works Director request for relinquishment on 1949 sanitary Release and sewer easement and new realignment foe Invest-West/Rainier Village. New Realignment *MOTION BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE TO`'REFER 'TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE: After discussion as to the location and problem requiring the new easement and release. Moved by Stredicke, second Shinpoch.to refer to the Administration to report back 'next 'week. Roll call vote: 4 no's, 3 aye's. Motion lost. *Original motion CARRIED'referring to' Utilities Committee. Approval of MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL 'ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA ipnsent Agenda AS AMENDED. 'CARRIED. 4 THE CITY OF RENTON ,t• (no MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MI LL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 7I CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 q. L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 D4)4,. SE13 ° June 22, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-167-78, Arthur D. Swanson Rezone Request. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated June 15, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on June 29, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on June 30, • 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on July 10, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this • matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerel , L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • City Clerk Attachment t_A>64., 4 pF - v 0. o THE CITY OF RENTON `/ Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 al,o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 235-2550 044). SEP��0O . MEMORANDUM June 12 , 1978 To: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner From: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: Michael Smith, Associate Planner Re: Rezone File No. R-165-78, Stanley E. Stone Rezone File No. R-166-78, Marvin D. Wehrman Rezone File No. -167-78, Arthur D. Swanson This department concurs with the Public Works Department in the need for public access into the general area of the subject rezones . One parcel, the subject of R-165-78, is totally landlocked at the present time. Also from a land use intensity standpoint, the existing extensive amount of B-1 zoning together with the proposed rezones and 222 unit apartment complex establish a critical need for suitable public access and circulation into the area, if proper growth and development of the area is to proceed. We also point to the Streets and Arterials plan, purposes and objectives , pages 2 and 3, which clearly indicate a need for suitable public streets consistent with land use trends . Regarding the location of a Street extending south from NE 4th Street, we are not adverse to an alternate location being provided. However, it' appears that the existing platted 30 foot right of way along the cemetery boundary, together with an additional dedication of 30 feet adjacent to the east of it, is the most appropriate and significantly established alternative to date. Further dedications will take place through rezones , site development, and possible condemnations . We would not object to a street along the power transmission line easement provided it was dedicated and developed to suitable city standards . The matter of access to Union Ave. NE is also important, particularly with regard to the Wehrman and Stone properties . However, such access will also provide an important link to the overall circulation pattern of the area as it will eventually connect to the proposed north/south street. It appears , given the validity of the 10/30/68 letter from the 10 L. Rick Beeler June 12, 1978 Page Two city clerk to Mr. Wehrman, that a full 60 feet of right of way (south 30 feet of Wehrman property and north 30 feet of city property) is possible from Union Ave. to the Stone property, with the possibility of the north 30 feet of the Stone property and the south 30 feet of the property to the north being dedicated and developed as part of rezone and development of these properties . MLS : jb 4OF R.e t,,, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON Z a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 op ,, . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p q- L. RICK BEELER , .235-2593 4TF • b June 30, 1978 • • Mr. Arthur D. Swanson 4512 Talbot Road S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-167-78; Arthur D. Swanson Rezone Request. • Dear Mr. Swanson: This is to notify you that the above referenced request; which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of June 15, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance., and therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Coucnil for final approval. • You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler • Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • City Clerk � 0F v \v o THE CITY OF RENTON 2. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 4 � L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 041.4-D SEPI I go June 22, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-167-78, Arthur D. Swanson Rezone Request. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated June 15, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on June 29, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete, file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on June 30, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on July 10, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, '> L. •ick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 15th day of June , 19 78 , affiant • deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this \5 - day of MI1v 19 11) . • Notary Pub lic c in and for thet �, of Washington, residing at Res� o19 y d ; t( 0o H 1 • �'• roe' '•.4� Application, Petition or Case : R-167-78; Arthur Swanson )1‘ (The mi t t b contain a Us.t 06 the pantim 06 necondl R-167-,. Page Two The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if the applicant possessed legal access over the 30-foot strip owned by the cemetery and the 24-foot strip owned by Mr. Ben Stark. Mr. Smith . deferred the inquiry to the applicant who advised that purchase of the 24-foot strip was not possible due to unreasonable purchase price and legal access could therefore not be gained. Mr. Smith clarified that the 30-foot strip is considered a public right-of-way by the City of Renton; however, litigation was pending involving the city and cemetery owners to establish status of legal ownership of the property. It was noted by the Examiner that alternatives such as shifting the proposed right-of-way to the east or - condemnation procedures may be necessary to gain access across the 24-foot piece of property. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Responding was: Marvin Wehrman 7459 S. 128th • Seattle, WA 98178 Mr. Wehrman indicated that although the existing Bonneville power line easement could not be utilized for construction of structures, it could be utilized for private access circulation purposes and parking for future developments. The Examiner asked Mr. Morgan for the division's opinion regarding the necessity of possible public access in conjunction with the 30-foot strip and condemnation of Mr. Stark's property to the property to the south. Mr. Morgan felt that the alternative would be logical for access to properties located to the south but that access from N.E. 4th Street would also be, a solution for the subject property. Responding to the Examiner's inquiries, Mr. Morgan indicated that consideration of plans to create a public right-of-way to the south from N.E. 4th Street had not occurred prior to the subject •application and that additional detailed study of proposed development would be required prior' to final determination of access provisions. Mr. Wehrman indicated that a demand for public access does not exist in the subject area due to joint ownership of 12 to 13 acres proposed to be developed by the same developer and because the Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park maintains a single primary access to Union Avenue N.E. and would not require public access to N.E. 4th Street. The Examiner advised that recent recommendations pertaining to expansion of the mobile home park required provision of a secondary access to align with the existing 30-foot strip currently involved in litigation. Mr. Smith advised plans for construction under building permit procedures of a proposed 222-unit apartment complex directly south of the subject site along with other high density development which would create a requirement for public access in the area. He noted that a possibility may exist to develop the entire area through a Planned Unit Development process in a single unified development with review of total access during final site approval. Regarding utilization of the Bonneville power line easement for access, Mr. Smith advised that power companies previously had been reluctant to improve public streets along transmission line easements although the access alternative still may be possible. He emphasized that it would be necessary to provide a north-south connector for controlled access onto .N.E. 4th Street as well as an east-west connector for access to Union Avenue N.E. Mr. Wehrman advised that a street will be developed south of Prairie Market from • Union Avenue N.E. to provide access to the proposed developments. . Responding to Mr. Smith's review of proposed development in the area, the Examiner asked Mr. Morgan for a recommendation from the Traffic Engineering Division regarding the need for public access to the subject properties from N.E. 4th. Street. Mr. Morgan reviewed potential vehicle trip generation computed from proposed densities in the R-3 zones for . proposed developments including the 222-unit apartment complex, Stanley Stone and Marvin Wehrman rezones for proposed multi-family development which would be projected .at 1760 • vehicle trips per day with development to maximum density according to standard published studies utilized by the division. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding whether public or private access would accommodate projected traffic volumes, Mr. Morgan indicated that while public access was preferable for future traffic volumes, a comprehensive study of circulation and proposed development in the area would be necessary to establish total access requirements. • Mr. Wehrman noted that the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for greenbelt designation on • . the proposed site would be negated by development of a public street on the westerly • • boundary of the property and suggested that access be developed along the transmission • . line easement connecting to an east-west street to Union Avenue N.E. which could be • designated as either one or two-way circulation. Responding to the Examiner's question regarding the adequacy of the proposed street from Union Avenue N.E. , Mr. Wehrman reported that in 1968 the Renton City Council had dedicated the northern 30 feet of the city-owned reservoir property 'to him for the purpose of `street development, and he would 'submit the letter or authorization 'as. an. exhibit during the public hearing for his rezone, R-166-78, • scheduled subsequently on. the agenda. Mr. Smith advised that during his review of the proposed 222-unit apartment complex, it was not apparent that the `development was functionally related'.,to the'proposals 'scheduled for hearing this date and if. the entire area was to be „dye]opid through a 'single developer a more cohesive•effort should be made to review June 15, 1978 ' . OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER . CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Arthur D. Swanson FILE NO. R-167-78 LOCATION: On Northeast 4th Street between Greenwood Cemetery and. Union Avenue Northeast. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to B-1 to allow the construction of multiple family housing units and/or . condominiums along with compatible retail outlets. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval to 'B-1 with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: . • Hearing Examiner: Approval to B-1 with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received'by the REPORT: 'Examiner on May 25, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field ,checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner . conducted a public. hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 30, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton • Municipal Building. ' Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by`' the Examiner. . It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, .Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: .. Exhibit #2: Comprehensive Plan Map Revision, dated 3-8-72 Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map - 1-200 scale . Exhibit #4: King County Assessor's.Map Exhibit 45: Plot Plan, 1-20 scale The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Arthur D. Swanson . • 4512 Talbot Road South . Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Swanson indicated his concurrence with the exception of Section P.6 which recommends ,provision of a 20-foot landscaped setback/buffer along the westerly edge of the.subject site. He felt that the existence of a 30-foot strip owned by Greenwood Cemetery along with a privately-owned 24-foot strip of land located along the westerly boundary of the property provided sufficient distance to preclude provision of an additional 20-foot landscaped setback/buffer. The Examiner asked for testimony in support or opposition to the application. • There was no response. Mr. Smith clarified the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan in requiring the landscape buffer because of the greenbelt designation of the subject property' ' on the plan, and because of the possibility of utilizing the aforementioned strips for street access purposes. Traffic Engineering Division representative, Clint Morgan, requested. clarification from Mr. Smith ,regarding possible inclusion of setbacks for future roadway widening purposes. . - He advised that installation of a double left-turn lane at N.E. 4th Street would require a roadway width of ,66 feet which was not provided with the proposed width of 54 feet. . Mr. Smith responded that recommendations .contained in Section P.5 for provision of a • ' , ' minimum 30-foot landscaped setback/buffer 'along N.E. 4th Street would accommodate the possible necessity for future roadway widening and installation'.of left-turn lanes. R-167-78 Page Four 7. Testimony was not presented regarding previous area land use or zoning analysis (Section 4-3014. (A) ) or the impact of significant improvements since those analyses (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . 8. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates the property to potentially be Greenbelt (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 9. Abutting the westerly boundary of the site is a 24+-foot strip of property that is privately owned, and immediately west of this strip is an existing 30-foot public right-of-way. This right-of-way is adjacent to the Greenwood Cemetery. Currently, the 30-foot right-of-way is in litigation concerning whether or not it has become private property of the cemetery. 10. Access to the property is available. from N.E. 4th Street of the transmission line easement. Staff recommended that access be developed on the westerly 30-foot right- of-way and that this access be public (60-foot right-of-way per attached memoranda of June 6, 1978 and June 12, 1978) , which would require use of the private abutting 24+-foot strip. Staff also recommended that this access be coordinated with vehicular circulation of the properties south of the site. 11. The easterly portion of the property extends into the transmission line easement. 12. B-1 zoning surrounds the property on the north, east and south sides. Low density 'single family (G) zoning (cemetery) abuts the western portion of the site. Testimony indicated that the property immediately south of the site is scheduled to be developed as a 220 unit multi-family complex. 13. Some substantial trees exist on the site. 14. Additional right-of-way for improvements in N.E. 4th Street may be necessary for dedication from the northern portion of the site. Testimony indicated that as much as ten feet of additional right-of-way may be needed. 15. In 1979, the intersection of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. is scheduled for improvement to increase vehicular capability. CONCLUSIONS: • 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan must be evaluated from the viewpoint of the Land Use Map and the Goals and Objectives. The Land Use Map indicates the property to be Greenbelt; however, a definition of this designation does not appear in adopted Comprehensive Plan documents. But it can be reasonably assumed that the intent of the Greenbelt is to provide an open space area in locations that are physically sensitive for development or that follow unique natural features. In , this instance the Greenbelt area on the Land Use Map appears to coincide with the transmission line easement, which would indicate an intent to retain the open space created by the easement and perhaps add open space areas of adjacent development. Testimony did not purport that the physical characteristics of the site posed developmental limitations. The condition of the easement is an open area cleared of almost all vegetation and used for access. Approximately the easterly 30% of the site lies within the easement. Dedication of additional area of the site for open space in conjunction with the easement would severely reduce the ability to reasonably develop the property. The Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan indicate that reclassification of the property to B-1 may be reasonable. B-1 zoning already abuts the westerly G zoning (cemetery) , and the reclassification would essentially constitute a "fill-in" of the existing B-1 zoning almost completely surrounding the site. This would be appropriate ". . .coordinated development of undeveloped areas. " (Summary, page 9, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July, 1965) . With some landscape buffer the rezone would not be ". . .unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns." (Objective No. 1, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Testimony did not claim that B-1 and the cemetery were incompatible uses. B-1 could be developed so as to protect ". . .property values. . .through the effective control of land use. . ." (Objective No. 4, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . This rezone would be the ". . .highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to the overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live and play." (Objective No. 6, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . R-167-78 Page Three various aspects of development. The Examiner suggested alternatives to the applicant including continuation of the public hearing to allow additional study of circulation requirements or closure of the hearing with subsequent receipt and review of the information to be included with the Examiner's report and recommendation on the matter. The applicant requested a brief recess to discuss the alternatives with associates. A recess was subsequently called at 10:05 a.m. and the hearing was reconvened at 10:20 a.m. Mr. Swanson reported that discussions with Mr. Smith during the recess had resulted in an acceptable proposal. Mr. Smith advised the applicants' concern with delay in development due to pending litigation regarding ownership of the 30-foot strip adjacent to Greenwood Cemetery and that review of utilization of the power line easement could be accomplished for possible public access. He indicated the applicants' willingness for. Examiner review of site development of the proposed 222-unit apartment complex concurrently with site developments proposed by Mr. Swanson, Mr. Stone and Mr. Wehrman which would be developed by one developer. He noted that the applicants' were in agreement that the public hearing be closed pending the study by the Traffic Engineering Division for review of access and circulation provisions. The Examiner advised his concern that his authority would not extend to encompass review of the proposed 222-unit apartment complex since development could occur through the building permit process and felt that Planning and Public Works Department review may be sufficient. Mr. Smith stated that because the proposed developments were closely associated, total review would be similar to Planned Unit Development procedures and would encompass aforementioned access problems and building placement during site development review. i Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding drainage provisions to prevent impact to or from the cemetery property, Mr. Smith reported Engineering Division concerns regarding drainage on the site and subsequent requirement for Public Works Department approval of final design. He indicated that a letter from Greenwood Cemetery relating to drainage problems would be submitted during review of a subsequent application on the public hearing agenda. The Examiner clarified that zoning designation of Commercial noted in Section B.9 of Exhibit #1 should be revised to Greenbelt designation. Mr. Smith confirmed the Examiner's statement. The Examiner reported that the public hearing would be closed and input from Planning and Public Works Departments would be received during the subsequent two-week period to be incorporated into the Examiner's report on the matter. He noted that the Planning Department had revised its recommendation for site approval of development included in rezones, R-165-78, R-166-78, and R-167-78 as well as on the 222-unit apartment complex proposed in the area owned by Mr. Wehrman. Mr. Smith advised that site approval had been previously recommended for the three rezoned developments and that the apartment complex review would be included due to its key relationship with the other properties to provide a comprehensive development for the entire area. The Examiner noted that he would retain flexibility in his final recommendation to determine the extent of his authority for including the apartment complex in his review. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-167-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of reclassification of approximately 1.83 acres from G to B-1. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. ' 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. • 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.. R-167-78 Page Six Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 29, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or, the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed' by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with theCity Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in 'said.office. • R-167-78 Page Five 2. Conditions need to be attached to the rezone to achieve complete compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. A landscape buffer of 20 feet along the westerly property line would adequately buffer the development from the cemetery and possible road between the two properties. (Objective No. 1, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Several substantial evergreen trees exist in this portion of the site which should be retained and used in the landscape buffer. This buffer would ". . . contribute to the overall attractiveness and desirability. . . " of the community and neighborhood (Objectives No. 2 and 6, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . . 3. Due to the potential expansion of the right-of-way of N.E. 4th Street for improvements, the northerly 30 feet of the site should be retained for landscaping. The existing substantial evergreen trees in this landscaping area should be retained as part of the landscaping of the site and any development. (Summary - Objectives, ' page 26, Comprehensive Plan, Arterials and Streets, June, 1965) . 4. Access to the site is readily available. In the best interest of the community and area surrounding the site a coordinated access is appropriate. The. study (attached) ' by the Planning and Public Works Departments indicated the 30-foot public right-of-way lying westerly of the property should be expanded to 60 feet to include a public street. ' This street would serve properties in the interior of the "block. " Condemnation may be necessary of the 24+-foot strip of property intervening between the cemetery and Mr. Swanson's property. , Approximately six feet of his property will' be required for the full 60-foot right-of-way. This right-of-way is appropriate in view of proposed development south of the site and resultant needed access. 5. The Public Works Department will review the storm drainage plans during the building permit process for conformance to Ordinance No. 3174. RECOMMENDATIONS: . ' Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council approve the reclassification from G to B-1 subject to: 1. Dedication of the westerly approximate six feet for public right-of-way so as to constitute a total of 60 feet in conjunction with the property westerly of the site. Access for development on the property shall preferably be to and from this public street. . 2. Agreement to participate On a fair-share and equitable basis in an LID for improvement of this street. 3. The westerly 20 feet, exclusive of the aforesaid dedication of right-of-way, shall be a landscape buffer between the property and the cemetery per approval of the Planning DepartMent. Existing vegetation in this buffer area shall be retained. 4. The northerly 30 feet shall be reserved for landscaping. Existing substantial vegetation shall be retained in this landscaping area. '5. Retention of existing trees as much as possible on the remainder of the site. ORDERED THIS 15th day of June, 1978. . i L. ick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of June, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: . Arthur D. Swanson, 4512 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Marvin WehrMan, 7459 S. 128th, Seattle, WA 98178 . TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of June, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman. Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public'Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning ,Director ' • Ron Nelson, Building Division • 'Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . . . .. .•„. ® , ••Ir: . .......Zei : 1 : 1 ' • 7.:.;:i.:fili-).-.: c;-;:-,::;;:.---. !'::': : : ••• , e. . :: i.••• --• 1\ ,I1, •''., •. li . 1 ii:-t-*-.*: ,7.1 _ - -• • Z •;;“:"n • ' I '\'• • •" • .I 1 i.1 .i.•'sa.i..1_,....;1.1::VL Z.:-.11: -.1!.1:10 nui 1.! 7 '•,; •',' ... ••:i• • ,,,,,,,, . • 144, . „ ., is IA ?j7-14:71"-TTC-•1:4-77:-.:T.:--7 r.-1,4'' : 2..•, •. • '.1/“i ill : .1,..).zi •t5,• \•''•' • 1.1. •il i 1 thilf • • ' • •• • . I I I ,:j;:i.:• ••a"lorlf......1%1‘•"••1_•,...2.:f..:.:) L. .. .. 1 •- . ..,:...„,...J.L1,,1 I , 1 NINO.WINN.6•10,•WW•WW••••••••••• •...ii : ' ;•••;4i :„...-,-J,i , . ,: .4, , ; • 11 1 1..11.111.1 .• .:!1;;•1°. el. ', .,__. ..14 .., S R7I k 1 itIZ•041 , • . " 1 ' G a %) k„ • - 4-_ _,: —11 ' A ;; . . GS 1 qici . i ) \\, ...__. • R-3 .1 . *' ' •: :' 19 , ,t , . , o ;•4 - .. .-'* ,.. i' „A ' , I, , .. - .6,--zi. -, -i-, '' : Lir' . i r I 2 D 1 - • ';',;', ' 2. ' • ): - ;20 T s B . . • 0, 0 1 . t4 E 4*.. tl: _,, , t °•41.,;•.'• r r"4--1:----.. 1. ;,- ..- I I . o B•I X A F G Su Ersecr .;I A SITE i . .. GREEki s/VOOD , , CEIMETER)1 . I !Lk- • " 5 E b.4 I• -.3-; . h., ! . . . , 1 . .:. .I . -1'f : ' • t . ' C D I I I '.1 . .. . . I • * _ 1 . 's 01".1, T• I'.' . __, . .1. N A Ai'i I ! . . . . ,• , . •(0, 'D.; <r G • . T . , II: •• I . • 4 Lar-wrWw,IN'wmi W 1•,-;•;•-:"--.•Irl--,a•1 1'T •34:):Ifw'[.',n',..cs...S . I •,,• , ••• • • • t I r... ..../.1..'. 1 .:• i 0 ..1.:)....3...y.....3.4 ••• ....- . . •:• • •,,,j,"--;10;.!..' • .i•: - I : .0.': '`• • ' • t , •-'•I . 6-'!".;;-'--.:.;•..1 1 , ."---—:---% • ;I:i. -":'. • • )‘: . 4, ' , . . • . . .. ti.::,\. ..,..,,,..:,..- -"<:::„....;..--" li I ' 1 / *1 . I • vh. i. k ialialahim .••••. ........A,........„_,.......... -- -—,.......-t:-..:-,-.. -.Lc-- .„.... _ _ ,....,__ . . . , ' , • , I I% c APPLICANT Adh.e. I,,).w-,Wa-N$6 iN TOTAL AREA _t:A s34tcres PRINCIPAL ACCESS P,.. N.g qIt057te e e , EXI S IN ZONING 6 ‘ Q /4eS rf.'-Al;on ls.frict it S.' fe Aiy)rAe sbie i1i o/ , i • , EXISTING USE Uncle vele:pet' ,..:,.. PROPOSED USE Mut-i-i'pie- Ce:AA;ly ilous;ou COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Caltidme.meal - COMMENTS , • - -, ,.,,,,,-4,; c- y'. '; . .;. ;: : : • ' ; . ; ::.';',,c't.,!::",',',1'';';' -,;:•:•5 ':::':':-:''''','; .. . . ' ':::.,' :' ' '',, ', -, r „: :' ‘ : , . . . ... :, ...,, i . . . , , ', :; ,,- ;41:;:::,' ":;; ';',,,-.a,',/,f'.. ,'',..:;',.;'''' ' :. :''''..;;;'' : '1';,";;..'':.;; '; ',-.-':-.,:,"::.;;";;';':;,' ' ' ; ''s' : , ''', • '; , : ;''...,,', '., ; .,,:,',:-4-.:;':', .':-. .1.: ,,' ., :•';• ; ,. ' : 2'',' ' ' ' ' t4 "At'iVi,6'V.,..0'',,..-'''''.-:' ''' ;'''H'.'''^''.i'l '',''',:'1: ! '' . ' ?:i: . :'•' .:, : .:, : „ ; !, '1'. ' • `, :, , :, ' :, , '„,..., . ',„; . ,,,':',.. 1 ',X.1'4'''''K'7,:?":,;;..r 1 i'"'','::'!..''' :"'''''{''''',.:: ', ''''.. '', .: '":':•.'.'''''' '''. . ''','''''''', :,:''% '' !%.. ''' ; ' : .' ' ''' . ''''' ' :: '' ' '.....'‘'' . .. '' ' ' ® , , �� JL llnlloX Av . NE. . 0•0 . • II _ ir ,, rt ElIn 1 �j rr 74 '' It V J- �, • in- 11 n. .i lit1�' . 4 • It IQ t ct e� . : -.'.-'.-'.::'--- .::-. • rr z/8F i J •e • ip. • ID ' . r� 1 ‘c,„V___ _ . n...:.• o ,1 e/ �� ee �� - � �� ---- %% • re .o4--_ ..4 --——— — —_ • • I I r • • RE` A. 46 • :4 . o THE CITY OF MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 e ® w' Yhh CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR a LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p L. RICK BEELER , 235 -2593 4rEO SEW'. �� May 31, 1978 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director "Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: File No. R-165-78; Stanley E. Stone Rezone Pile No. R-166-78; Marvin D. Wehrman Rezone File No. R-167-78; Arthur D, Swanson Rezone • Per the discussion during today's public hearings on the above, the hearings' were closed subject to completion of your analysis of the traffic circulation in the area of properties. Please provide your recommendation on: • 1. The need for a public right-of-way. • 2. The use of the transmission line easement. 3. The 'use Of the right-of-way adjacent to the cemetery property. 4. The access to Union Avenue N.E. Since the existing right-of-way adjacent to the cemetery is in litigation, Y would suggest discussing with, the City Attorney any recommendations pertinent thereto. Since my recommendation to the City Council is due June 13, 1978, please provide me your written analysis and recommendation by June 8, 1978. • L. Rick Beeler cc: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney ai ® THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 2 E; 8 CHARLES J. OELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235- 2550 SEPS��O • 11), M RECEIVED June 12,' 1978 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER To: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner JUN 121978 AM PM From: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director ` 1819 9,9ls12al1213 415,6 By: Michael Smith, Associate Planner Re: Rezone File No. R-165-78 , Stanley E . Stone Rezone File No. R-166-78, Marvin D. Wehrman • Rezone File No, R-167-78,. Arthur D. Swanson This department concurs with the Public Works Department in. the. need for public access into, the general area of the subject rezones . One parcel, the subject of R-165-78, is totally landlocked at the present time. Also from a land use intensity standpoint, the existing extensive amount of B-1 zoning together with the proposed rezones and 222 unit apartment complex establish a critical need for suitable public access and circulation into the area, if proper growth and development of the area is to proceed. We also point to the Streets and Arterials plan, purposes and objectives , pages 2 and 3, which clearly indicate a need for suitable public streets consistent with land use trends . Regarding the location of a Street extending south from NE 4th Street, we are not adverse to an alternate location being provided. However, it appears that the existing platted 30 foot right of way along the cemetery boundary, • together with an additional dedication of 30 feet adjacent to the east of it, is the most appropriate and significantly established alternative to date. Further dedications will take place through rezones , ' site development, , and possible condemnations . We would not object to a street along the power transmission line easement provided it was dedicated and developed to suitable city standards . The matter of access to Union Ave , NE is also important, ,particularly with regard to the Wehrman and Stone properties . However, such access will also provide an important link to the overall circulation pattern of the area as it will eventually connect to the proposed north/south street. It appears , given the validity of the 10/30/68 letter from the L. Rick Beeler June! 12, 1978 Page Two city, clerk to Mr. Wehrman, that a full 60 feet of right of way (south 30 feet of Wehrman property and north 30 feet of city' property) is possible from Union Ave . to the Stone property, with the possibility of the north 30 feet of the Stone property and the south 30 feet of the property to the north being dedicated and developed as part of rezone and development of these properties . MLSsjb it INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 6, 1978 ' TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: Warren C. Gonnason SUBJECT: Stone, Wehrman & Swanson Rezone There is no doubt that the Stone property does need public access. The use of the power line is not recommended. The cemetery right-of-way as you know is in question and if it were to be used an additional 30 feet would be required from the people in the east. This would provide access to NE 4th St. It would be best to acquire the 30' adjacent on the east next to the cemetery. Thereby providing access to NE 4th St. (SEE ATTACHED MAP) Stone would still have problems. Perhaps he can acquire the property to the west therby giving him access to the road along the cemetery. dr e 4.; Proposed 60-foot right-of-way for access from Union Avenue N.E. per letter from City Clerk, dated October 30, 1968, is acceptable if proper cul-de-sac is provided. - R.C.H. RCH:slg RECEIVED CflY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 71978 AM PM • 2 :3 71819Mai t 1241 a1 +1. }1,, . . . . ,, . . " , . ro e ..„,. ..,..,... „.. ...,„ .. ‘,.. .,.. _ ,, . . .\ .... 1 .,,, ,, „-. . ...„..-.., , „. . , : . : : • !, : 7 • ,.''. • a•-,),FIL-__ -----,,,,.,?•, i i �\ y /• 4AMOR •L.. ` • iW .) ;CC Al1ONA,. rl' `,,\< ,,s. '.ram 1 _, - • Jat_ -J=�- 3.. .� h�� .mo % r r 1 2/ / Ste/ �R _ t .v ��D _ ' eye)• N. 4 5 >f � �r C l� 1'/Jr.1,')l`:?1),fr(Jr j 1 c r !r1 • v �1� 'iii'l f 4 1 ry r 1 r } ` r./ }jam �' >al�W ` ' WI • •' ,,'•,/ :�V.j7 (f�JL'/'5/1. SY lI ;lY•'< ,�,/ 5 — :;'I, I�R7 4 1s_-. 7,/ I,1'�1/ J�[/.[y f F�r 1 { �Y r _ , 1 . ..ap, al m L[N,ILKY �t rit�(7f.,`�l' �.�j j�� '��r{r 11�"f, I IIIIIIIIIIIII ;"'"iiiiiilll t • 'I •� 1l..'r /,V 1.11 1'..r f ''f e t :<.. ;L:.,:si rJ �1 J: v{)f ; rvf '=i f J ''J A`" fa` �, �`•� T i.t.. r 1�y ,:.,.�: i''' !''' J C c.?).,, 1.1 •�,yy1(r \•1 f-Y' •/ "', ..,ji•. ,�.\....-t,�/ 111111.(‘ Y 1 f i�•,'. I f'- Y ,' �''!'r� I 1 > .-'.a fir.: �` / / �,1 ..��a�.e..'.� .— t� •:fit_.-frr • 1 p','- .i: .., , ��'�Yyyy'f , _ _ ! yj:.. i,"��r'..,'c: tip•.`, "�•`e'.7:- ,C?>., `:ti';r'.:,;`'.' ,� V.. ta`:.��tl�: fS}• t Ji�:5^'µ}.,Ctiu. �. ..�'�;`..;��\t- \�'�ti^` ��``• _ 1 I i }ate tf 17? 1.tj.i. 'n59lyif t :t\ :: ;; .[(X ICE ,\r..,�.t)S1:' { !' Zj •-?,\,', .• f 11 :'1,Vt f,,,` '::.'• y.-.0 r,,f.�r'.r_i:.... i-`:'`.•=v.. r i'�:;:- '1,:;j' T.•L CITY ®F R \Adc ; \ ` KARINA EXAMINE �� 1 ` i ii. r \ '""'��i I , -♦. pP M UK -\ \\ ®�c yY ir'< �57 MAY 3 01978 = � �o ., >AM ply __. 1 "� S; Atiok., _"s 4 I L:i„,i 'j�) V S ha` , SG p` i '7i :r9id0�11112e1e2o�3.e4i5►� � 1 _ i . '''' Z; ,sy z, < "� i :,\', ' ,.fdle "STONEWAY EXHIBIT A" as revised March 8 , 1972 PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE CITY OF RENTON' S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Property Description: That general area included within the following boundaries, FAI 405 , NE 3rd and 4th streets, Union Avenue NE and SE, and the bluff line north of Maple Valley Highway. LEGEND I • f . 1Single Family Residential Public Use or Quasi-public 77: Low Density Multi Family Res. _� Recreation • I""" Medium Density Multi Family Res . `' i Greenbelt E ; High Density Multi Family Res. - - Proposed Boulevard \ CINIT' '-r • (\A ' ( . _ • I , . 1 [ 4 T 1+ ' ST r UN‘o.a I losLj AUT 1Aut1 ARTNU2 D. , SW 1 1 fitH 50 N i + 1.83 ACRE 1 -- 1 1 1 + MA KEr _ Q 1 CARL SMITI-{ d I - - + I i 1 --- CITY OF (:ftt TON I P.L. NUN N RECEIVED 1 +J^ CITY OF RENTON -___ _ ! HEARING EXAMINER �-- �' MAY 3 01978 PM kREGFIVE O RCC` AM 1b o 7,819,10,1111Z1112,3,4,5,61 IIi I i \\1., , 'it., . ��NG DEPN- ,., ,Y� f NY�'ti E XHI O. 3 ITEM NO. e /i 7- 71 PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED • CITY OF RENTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER MAY 30 , 1978 AM MAY 1979 PM 71819e10111i12111213141516 APPLICANT: ARTHUR D. SWANSON FILE NUMBER: R-167-78 EXHIBIT NO. / . A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ITEM NO if- /c 7- 7f Applicant requests the approval of a rezone from "G" to "B-1" to allow the construction of multiple family housing units and/or condominiums along with compatible retail outlets . I . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Arthur D. Swanson 2 . Applicant: Arthur D. Swanson 3 . Location: On Northeast 4th Street between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Avenue Northeast. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is avail- able on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property: + 1 . 83 acres . 6 . Access: Via Northeast 4th Street. 7. Existing Zoning: G, General Classification District, Residence Single Family 8 . Existing Zoning in Area: G, Single Family Residence District B-1, Business Use T, Trailer Park 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To permits rezone of the subject site into an area suitable for develop- ment of multiple family housing and/or condominiums and compatible retail uses . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance Number 2249 dated June 22 , 1966 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is basically level with a slight rise to the south and east. 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) , runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops , and for urban development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRZLIMINARY REPORT TO HLrIRING EXAMINER PUBLIC REARING: ARTHUR D. SWANSON, FILE NUMBER R-167-78 MAY 30 , 1978 PAGE TWO • 3 . Vegetation: The subject site contains a wide variety of trees , shrubs , and ground cover with numerous Douglas Firs , Hemlocks, and Alders . 4 . Wildlife: The existing vegetation of the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: There is no surface water evident on the site. 6 . Land Use: The site is basically undeveloped. The surrounding area is primarily single family residential in nature with commercial uses located to the northeast. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area is predominantly single family residential in nature . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Water and Sewer: An existing 12" water main is located along Northeast 4th Street and a 16" main extends south on Union Avenue Southeast for approximately 750 feet. An 8" sanitary sewer is situated on Northeast 4th Street and a similar pipe is located on Union Avenue Southeast extending south for approximately 450 feet. 2 . Fire rotection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance Requirements . 3. 'Transit: Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue Southeast within 1/4 mile of the subject site . 4 . Schools: The subject site is located approximately 1/2 mile south of the Honey Dew Elementary School; approximately 1 1/4 miles south- I ' east of McKnight Junior High School; and 1 mile southwest of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks: Kiwanis Park is approximately 1/2 mile north of the site and Windsor Hills Park is within 1 mile to the west. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-709A, Residence Multiple Family. 2 . Section 4-729G, Residence Single Family. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL ',CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Comprehensive Plan, 1965 Land Use Report, Objective 6 , Page 18. J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The rezone process will not have any direct have any direct impacts. However, resulting development from such rezone may disturb existing soil and vegetaiton, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, these can be mitigated by proper development ocntrols and procedures. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Future development subsequent to a rezone will increase population levels and the related social impacts. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW. 43.21C, a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. This declaration is based on provision of suitable development procedures and standards. 1 ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PPELIMINARY REPORT TO 11:LitiiRlNG EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ARTHUR D SWANSON, FILE NUMBER R-167-78 G MAY 30 , 1978 PAGE THREE • !. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3.• City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. ' O. STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed B-1 zone is not consistent with the comprehensive plan map element which designates the site and area within the powerlines easement as greenbelt. However, there is existing B-1 zoning east of the site, within the powerline easement and south of the site. 2. The Greenwood Cemetery is located west of the site. There is a 30 foot existing right of way adjacent to the cemetery together with a 30± foot strip between that right of way and the subject site. It appears that this strip of land was intended for use as a future access street. This right of way must be assured to provide suitable access to the site and area to the south. 3. The intent of the comprehensive plan greenbelt designation was to establish a buffer between the cemetery and future•uses to the east. At the time the compre- I hensive plan was adopted the powerline easement may have been considered a right of way owned by the power company. It appears that the plan was inaccurate in its assessment of the necessity, amount, and exact location of greenbelt buffer areas. It is a fact that B-1 zoning surrounds the site directly to the south and east. This has an effect of limiting the effectiveness of a greenbelt on the subject site. 4 It would appear that a more appropriate buffer or transitional land use would have been a medium or low density multiple family designation. Suitable setbacks and landscape buffers can also be established as part of rezoning, to correspond to the spirit of the plan. Comprehensive Land Use Report, Objectives 1 and 2 page 17. L. 4. The area along the north side of N.E. 4th Street is presently zoned and developed as B-1. 5. The need for a left turn lane along N.E. 4th should be studied and required as ! part of any rezone. 6. Given the amount of traffic and the potential for future widening of N.E. 4th Street, additional setbacks and landscape/buffer should be provided along N.E. 4th Street L (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, Objective 2, 4, and 6, page 17-18.) • 7. The Utilities Division has indicated that suitable sewer and water line extensions per the Comprehensive Utility plan will be required as part of site development. 8. There are a number of existing evergreen trees on the site. These should be retained as much as possible as part of site development and design. 9. Certain drainage problems in the area adjacent to the cemetery must be resolved as par of site development. • i.i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING ARTHUR D. SWANSON, FILE NUMBER R-167-78 , MAY 30, 1978 PAGE FOUR P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of B-1 zone conditions in the form of restrictive covenants as follows: 1. Provision of adequate public access to city standards along thesterl edge of the subject site as part of site development. • 2. Site development approval. Specific site development plans including site plan, landscape plan, building elevation design, and parking and circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the Hearing Examiner. 3. Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design, development, and landscape plans. No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed landscape and open s0ace plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. A11 utilities shall be provided per Public Works Department approval comprehensive utilit plan at the time of site development. 5. Provision of a minimum 30 foot landscaped setback/buffer along N.E. 4th Street. 6. Provision of a 20 foot landscaped setback/buffer along the westerly edge of, the subject site. • • • • • • • t. = 1: I j .. -Cramilor . • , y • la 7- - - 1'1 . ,..r....7:-...,.,••••.!....f-,.0: 0. ;...,.,-, v., li • : : i r. 1 m •.. r ?: -'- ‘'':, 1 I 44__s_-,-.,,,,, *) .".•'.`•%---....-=.--"ri •:il. ' . . ' (•,..• . °"7"°''ret. , ......:T......,\.. .24...1.::::_;.j.s... cf..--,.. , :, g.,-,.....,:.,..• .. ..;e ..... i....," .! ,i . .:1:-;';'S'"2-• :.41. .. iTi :-A' :7' '17.-----• • ..',ni ir_ -.t. . • . . •: ., &A NilLTA1-1.r1-.T.,... . .,.• 4,-A---f-,- ,------. 1 : .., 1):,. I,- i; ,::.•.'.";i .. . . , .•. •.1 •j .1 5 iv . I,......:4,:ioti.i...V.‘...1.:14.,ir:,.. ... l'.;412'.• t,74 'at t -'•4 ' U•I • •• a •': •47'it - gh .,. . . .., . . 1 ; , c..•.,...,,,,• ...,,____,...4•••,..---1.1-,•-,1•211!1"!"M LI.'___*.l. Ltd . _,,i_i2JiLiti_nll ; •z-z.L. :_ , 'I. .' j .1110•re.....1f66.60.r..r. •....4 .• „ . i II '..:,1.1.t.f.t •A,. ,..- -,1 . ". • ' , ' SR-I t:4 ii.-- .'1',,' • ..V___L-°-id - : , ! . I • , , , • ' • G Gs i . L., . . • -,-1 . : N 1 ...1 . . ..---, 1%, .• . ...II.IC _....., k...t_) •: 1.•.1• •_, ..l 4.• •••"" ..;.: ki k 1 ,. " • • ) . • • - • • . R-3\). • . „r- R -3 . !4 I 1 .. ,. . . ., . . li . a • ' ' Aumminwirj '1,, 4 ; " .,. 19/ , ki • 1 - , i i ' ... -q1 • B r,. ./. + . • ,„..,1,.!, 7F ! : ; I • ,,, • .e.,,,.; ...-_-- — z . ... •• . ., -- zo :1 D • I -...2__A_ ._ 1 ! , - • . - - 4 • - . ,. ._.. . r* E. 4 T. -0--- 1 - Nik. -•..•!!!!... r.P•.••• .— • • I 1 1 f Li ,: rAFG suirsecr i, —_ • ' 51-re ,. ,_ ... ' ii, GREENWOOD , -1 , . • ,' , -...-6- - l'-• ' ---1 , , ....:;:- • , , ! : ! CEMETERY I t , • rrr. • - +- • • ' . • ';iss'' • • • .4 , 1 I : ' m I ' •-'• 1 r • ji f___ . . ., 1 • . _ _ _... .. I• I -/,, _ 1 i __ .--.•• • __ •• 1 ., . . / . . I • • I. • , _ I • , I • , • ,/ ' • I •, ._ ___ __ .. , . . 1 • . 1 . , , • ,,.••..__ : 4 .• 1 .. Y -a 0 a. ta at a• as \ . . I •"•-'•4 . •4" . ''::,..)•1-•-•-•- . • \•• • ' • . y , .0.• ; . • ...;....-; '..',4,.• ••:,.\ ,• , I ' , .:,... s ,,,,...... , s....-.c. ,,,--,,,••'„ 11,-- .„ i,"...- I ' ' ' -.:-'-',2-i'-.-'`':-. ••'• v'-- -'''• •" . s.-------- '',,,...1.‘-1-. II' , - • '-,• ° ', ..,.,........„,„„,..._ s••\- .:I. , 1 \ . •• , ' •••• , "• ' . 7 1 , . , i ' ••••• se i . • - --- •.'; e.' '''-'*''' . _,,,,:-:-.---'- '-'- \...... ,......„ .'- L'7. II i • , ' •• .• 1 ' • • • • ' ..>_„,...•:------ ' \ , . — • , .. i • APPLICANT Aefitue. b.SWa.K5ork• PRINCIPAL ACCESS ir;Net. N.87 qt6 Sireee- 1 . , . TOTAL AREA ± /, S 34r.cres EMS." 'Nu ZONING I-6 , Qe....,e.nt I ClatPria.kon a's-6'1cl-t SA 4' le 7L:s. y)Oesielemfra 1 v i EXISTING USE Uncleitetopect i ... PROPOSED USE Mut+t'pf& 'Elmily fidus,'eti • • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN , Cottimiercittl . COMMENTS I' , . . . . . , . ,., - . • . ... .-. ....-- - . ..... . , , - ...,, H - i , i I,_ _ _ - —- ---- _ 'r,I. + 3Q0. i, : 1+ ', — _`_ it rr �� I, .t .� rf- �.% r ' ITOT ;; 11 384° 4J 1t • it , ,i a 11) at El I r, 3$�� II �a 1 ;r, r o M D3.7oy t as il 11 it t 1t It 11 t_ t at .� i ►t .1 1 p , A � 4) 1tw it 390! w pY°°" A u 1, ti Ow 11 ❑ 11 :t wi Yn N. m ,t `, 11 -6 n ., n II t, N CA ,1 N 11 �% il. . i Di o N 5 "3/W WQ)Nn 0 . animM onii,OEM=it IIIIMIIIIII. allir 1111MMIM 1 t Ft � � ' t�i ' ! co 0_1. _...4 —— 1 � 0 0 i til wiQ , n 1 : i ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED S - { • PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: c— 7U -/ .1 REZONE ,qrurNotz __SWAN).s0iJ MAJOR PLAT • SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT ______ SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT . . . ..PERMIT •OR.. EXEMPTION . . . H AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE V.0(7x SIGNATURE OR INIiT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDING \ L5=_Tib .i X ' 1 �' TRAFFIC E t—_�i?S ' if,'r/��' ENGINEERI X „ 5 ,_ '-'7eF-- 2 IR /� .� 5'/6'/7,c • HEALTH 6---fil-t t.-rn K--Z...) X C REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : is . ... ,9 . I . PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W. : 1pi . i1 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS 01/43' TO : O Finance Department ►! Fire Department ' 40 Library Department ! O Park Department • Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) (M(c-14 L- S- i 7'►} SUBJECT : 1Revi ew of ECF- 337 ; Appl i cati on No . : /2-1(01-73' Action Name : Al2-'71-ku►t lecZewg c 7b 5-I Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : Ikhf REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : .i Department : 8(--7)� Comments : 011011!111-r_4- Signaturoeoopriirector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7 // Comments : Gts /,- • c-5-75-/F Signature of Director or Au horized Representative Date 1 ' 6-76 • (OVER) I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : • �2�//��✓J�yZ9 Comments : LdU/C ac.ro'.5s /�-Pi2 Gt/e:1,0d ae.77e/e7 / i 1 5/0/er--!I ic�zv 7-e/ i irea/� t"`''L i77F'a'i?� ©/C�'SG1ear�„�� r-�.� ,f60o2AGC* t J/SC'rielr C•C / f�u�. .�r l'�• �l�� ':r • -78 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ur Comments : O,41;¢„ r .,f:,. �.��:� LC- �.r , ) . T`1.1 1;U r lZ.tl'i c,./. / cr.: 74>2:- - J-FP tS'1' I f S r 1 ,tx ( Z v.A l xT.1-ems U }�';�� C--.z vt A � �,Y� �`cwt.C, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Tr a / ) 1-1/ r �q Comments : p • 6,61 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • 1 ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL ...-.'.LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, ..-JN-SIGNIFICANCE � I { Application No . R- 167-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-339-78 EX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests approval of rezone from G to B- 1 to allow the construction of multiple family housing units and/or con- dominiums along with compatible retail outlets . Proponent ARTHUR D. SWANSON On NE 4th Street between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Location of Proposal Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is 0110 is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was maae after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons fo'r declaration of environmental /significance : _ This declaration is based upon further review of specific site develop- i' 1 ment plans which address such issues as tree preservation , landscape/ open spade , drainage, site design , density and layout , screening and buffering, access , and other pertinent elements which when suitably provided jin such plans will mitigate potential impacts . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : ' I I Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title P ; nin/� ir:ct•i na.te May 23, 1978 i Si gnatureo/� d_� �t /' City of Renton 'I Planning Department 5-76 • • 11ho THE CITY OF RENTON 010 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ' O Opp °�' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ➢ MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER I(0, p� �Q L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 .1 tD SE PS7- May 31,' 1978 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director FROM: I L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: File No. R-165-78; Stanley E. Stone Rezone File No. R-166-78; Marvin D. Wehrman Rezone File No. R-167-78; Arthur D. Swanson Rezone Per the' discussion during today's public hearings on the above, the hearings were closed subject to completion of your analysis of the traffic circulation in the area of properties. Please provide your recommendation on: 1. The, need for a public right-of-way. 2. The use of the transmission line easement. 3. The use of the right-of-way adjacent to the cemetery property. 4. The; access to Union Avenue N.E. Since the existing right-of-way adjacent to the cemetery is in litigation, I would suggest discussing with the City Attorney any recommendations pertinent thereto. Since my recommendation to the City Council is due June 13, 1978, please provide me your written analysis and recommendation by June 8, . 1978. T _ 1 , . ipp L. RicOeeler cc: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • 1 1 Affidavit of Publication Avenue N.E.,directly ad- STATE OF WASHINGTON jacent to the southwest • corner of the existing COUNTY OF KING ss Prairie Market facility. •Legal descriptions of files noted above on file } in the Renton Planning .l)"-L. �._ t -. ,1,;1.P yl Department. being first duly sworn on ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS PRE- oath,deposes and says that `r'C is the C h i C f l;�'c.r,K ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- of SENT AT THE PUBLIC THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) HEARING ON May30,19 S times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and AT THEIR0 A.M.TO ONEXPRESS has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred — OPINIONS. to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- NOTICE OFRI GORDON P. ERI E paper published four(4) times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING CTOR and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained RENTON LAND USE at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton HEARING EXAMINER Published In The Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the RENTON,WASHINGTON Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, A PUBLIC HEARING Record-Chronicle May 21, 1978. R4947. WILL BE HELD BY THE Washington.That the annexedisa ==C v- h==?C RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT e fl r ina 1 HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- • BERS, CITY HALL, RE- NTON,WASHINGTON,ON • as it was published in regular issues(and MAY 30,1978,AT 9:00A.M. not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period L OWING O EET THE FOL- LNG PETIT 1.STANLEY E.STONE, APPLICATION FOR RE- of - consecutive issues,commencing on the ZONE FROM G TO R-3, File No. R-165-78;prop- 21 day of '. J l {, erty located approxi- 19 and ending the mately 650 feet south of N.E. 4th Street west of Union Avenue N.E.,bet- day of ween existing Green- and ex- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly dist 19 ributed botto ilt ssub- stiateso g CemeteryiyofRenton scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee pro Petty. 2. ARTHUR D. -..t f} SWANSON, APPLICA- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ r--• - vhich has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the TION FOR REZONE first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent No. R G TO B 1; File insertion. I No. -167-78; property located along the south y side of N.E. 4th Street • 1... .�Q `. t adjacent to the northeast j corner of Greenwood I Chief C 1 r, k Cemetery. 3. MARVIN D . WEHRMAN, APPLICA- • TION FOR REZONE Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 day of FROM G TO B-1; File No. R-166-78; property :ay 197 j located approximately , 480 feet south of N.E.4th L"' / -;, Street, west of Union I /7%1/ �7,j. // 'J .2'` �( .. Notary Public"ip and for the State of Washingt .= I residing at Kent, King Co' ty. • /' 'i �t —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June k`J t� '�', 9th, 1955. 4 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, j� f.':;?I, r� l� i adopted by the newspapers of the State. t 1 s � ;r 0't Rk\ w RECEIVED 96 CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION ArR 17 Mira 94` FOR OFFICE USE ONLY C noa�m� LAND USE HEARI j w� APPLICATION NO. if/C7- ,7eP EXAMINER 'S ACTIO '1/1. APPLICATION FEE $ /1/ ) APPEAL FILED h�// 2ECEIPT NO. 6 J.2-J CITY COUNCIL ACTION. ILING DATE r'51- /7 -/41 ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE FEARING DATE -3 f-7J iPPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : Zz6 ▪ Name 2T v 2 P . S W A N S Ot' Phone \-1 e)( G S 8 7 Address 451Z. \ AL5 oT - �o A o So vT Ht r..tv'3'o N �l A ` % o S S 1. Property petitioned for rezoning is located - r old N • 4"T�� between G2t;FN W 0,30 0 a.t< and U N t a.>,L.. A V 6_ • ▪ Square footage or acreage of property \ Y 83 AC.1Z S Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) EAST 2.7o FELT oP TNF_ Vv €ST Soo Pc Q-T OF T € N04--'ta • WAL •1,'1- Nolvr14 wG-ST C4A1 (LTM.. oc- TWr V..)ORThSAST GOAD-7E o. -\' k•1Q(iT>-1,C`AS-r QVACLT"F.t- O(i 76-0- - aN 1 —row N5141Q Roan 2A N Qt. )`\N G Co)NTY w t4St- 1N GTO N . ff Existing Zoning t`r:cNI c•a-ea \ G ) • Zoning Requested OTE TO APPLICANT': The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate . . Proposed use of site CoNo,onn1NtuMS Aw09o0. M,utTr -• PAM' LY NOVSING I Arro..o.vi t/V IT 11 (Z -r, l L OL 1 L0 T ' Came 4TI aLe. ) yr IS-1 ZON Q ▪ List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. C ow\eLY W\ 1-1-1 "T C\TY OC- C. N•r-ON Q,tzQV1(L€ML' N*TS 1V f� To 5-rRci. -r5 , l' 1i IK G ANr7 ,LArJO 5'C A ? l N G 1 ▪ How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 1/V 1 -1-1-4 I N at\1G "T GAO- • Two copies ofIplot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 I • AF .FIDAV • IT I , Arthur -D. Swanson ,. being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 26th day' of October , 19 77 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle /T• 1 (______ ) _____ CI:—) (Name of N ary P lic) (Signature of Owner) 10457 Des Moines Way South 4512 Talbot Road South (Address), • �•r• (Address) ' .-Seattle , WA 98168 Renton, Washington 98055 •-- •g\�'M E1,0� _ o •.' •• G 0: c, �'�AUe \�M, (City) (State) 226-7920 . . (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify- --ia the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been fo, • dO4o g t' orough and complete in every particular and to conform to the,'Z1e r-a{{r�d relations of the Renton Planning Department governing the;N 1ifig, 4!0u'd application . i ,(-, Date Receives , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 RF'1/� CITY OF RENTON, WASH i NGTON I,�rIII�D ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . • R� Lr '0- �p �? 3.9 0 �1J bU e FOR OFFICE USE ONLY V DEV!�� Application No. -/t7-�d Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : _ Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance IDDeclaration of Non-Significance E] Declaration of Non-Significance . COMMENTS : 1 Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal iS such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, .or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary ,delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers • should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of. proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • I . BACKGROUND 1 , ,Name of Proponent A2T Hv2 D. Sw_ANSOh) Z. Address and phone number of Proponent: 4 S\2- 1 A`go (ofn`o A 9 �o v w _-- c.o o c+.,z 97.m. - -12�H 1-0 N 4 a `3,c8 0S3 \yoms._ CoS%1 3. .Date Checklist submitted I ( (-1L \91 ' 4. :,Agency requiring Checklist Cl "rY oc. 1 TON 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its 'size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of �i+ts scope and nature) : • 1`�, U1 L - A LT ("L("Lg. Are" yr —t'AoVs1NC ANo/J 3el CONoGM1N Vc — rr'r+tc-N\\'X 4...Xi w l -r (2 -T-A I L o v-s L( r) co rv1 Q AT y r t 4, C,-\ Z oN • -2- 1 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : \V` PC1-o a�Gz��P �•f+g Y+AgT o lam- ScUi44 C.1Oo 9 Q-��ATaacL�• A N9 ^' I c.-R� M A_- `1I4.-rA e+ 4o._-C�-\N\c4-. till g AN A O c.afW ►Q . 3 TA -i t ..1 1 KLCLcuAt.4 VS N 4L.FkELT' L;A\ , 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : • W %Tk r< 0 e4 elitP.cL Or— k e 2 (La v A t_ 9. List; of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal - (federal , state and local --including rezones) : e V,L 0 \v. € l Gwti tv�>T r�ci�►v�tt—• .V J�AT. Ara , Hoc -) P 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity relalted to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: (Lob Q t;Cz"C`ti T o \h 6`' S a VT�i `N, '.- - (S%L. . S7 41A Q..p Cow --c.v Qc s4 \--Y 1 • 1. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: I Not • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the •pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • Sys �T • • . • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? acv%.y i s RequiNEP F®ct C-0.4Nowetc)cv9 ANC> 0Ac1•14.1refa Arta." YES MAYBE NO •(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief • features? ew`71 Ag Rt ovoaAa f®a- eAct+411,4G YES MAYBE Ao At As ascmv f ova at, oea s (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? - YES MAYBE NO (e)' ; Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? gctecv woe. Ilia c®tlPo$11.9 ®°f QA41.4%0G, °SACalwmswG ®GL sl Atrov YES MAYBE NO 1SrKcam(ibS .(f) '1 Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or I changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which I may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES M YBE NO Explianation: "i' ;S eAa.v..AU- Is -6.3 -1!"%f. b %(=ii c (PAWN AN 0CI Aq-Get, 9 'q'A a t) A A O t S, tt,err Pt g00%ca.. A te.cam c.�, Qt,d $70..e.h" oeb. • • • • -3- • (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? bewLy `rldo5& ASsc;PeIA-re:® WrTla YES MAYBE NO igE.$tP14-4mTIAL. U5F (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE W (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: "c• C -rears eeto-) F r eS Sct"A C o w+ C r tiz p o A t FR M e V 5 -&u 1°A0 15 T U a e O T'Sa NN P@ CL A T!9 11.0 (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of . water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) ', Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water7 runoff? X cot-010o c�Trcm-. ®Cr �a.ca A�mo PAQ1i,NG 5astq,Ac� YES MAYBE NO (c) , Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? , YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? G„ i r5,7ANG6 440 Scwn" A,a.G.A YES MAYBE 0 ca,c AQ.6.0 -Pea 'ToTaaL. P`A s- ctAV (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? C cal, ev.e 4- r e 604 N&Met S hl o v e,0 Ec. YES MAYBE NT- tao Cbei®w6C. • (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X_ YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? �S YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ,( YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . ~ 'C YES MAYBE N� Explanation: -TFte3 is i•,10`r q A&Y oC Q LArsa4 Gre rq meLA 1-44a.'r N$ CoNTCL.etiv1-on_y To ?u6"3Lr C udAlr rr. Su9(5 (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) ' Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? �C ta Q(Lc"'ac. tvt L L. il. L_Ar O. Sc AC fc o YES , MAYBE KU- (b) ' Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE N(� (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? • Y MAYBE NO " Explanation: -PA%s Aa &.ta es NWT- NO WAS tg0-r cts.t,a Use‘o `02 A GQtcu>m-rV(Le . -4 (5) Fauna. Wi11 the proposal result in: • ' (a) , Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers •of • any species of fauna (birds, land animals including ' • reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna?. • YES MAYBE NO ,• (c) , Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: kio WQ7 v44ae. pF N � SiGNIFecANT t. L% exe No6wTor TtA, I S •'AaFA • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase•existing noise • levels? , ' . _ .k . YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: ADQrT JaL. L\VV in) G C er.T Fc 3 u Cet.G. s . F. Inv6rbfah. clsrPa®Pe_&. Atsp T' tLza, ASV®CI1:4,-6ro A ex; lo g.S' (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? • . . YES , :'MMAYBE v� Explanation: Aooti toaea L'‘GtaTSi=ott �.t v tv C. Q Ca.r�,/L) (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in, the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: t.oev-4 VAQ.Awr 'Y-o 0t,7 -F•AMit°r t(0.4t0a:4riW14, (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 011ts?1' �cifl, _T•b3405P„ _ 2.P„9csu ft..J QU1 (Leo To• SUee0 tde Te -FRlrvelLYtoa 117.5_ • • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, . but ,not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) • in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO . Explanation: . • • • ( 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? �Q , • . Yam— 'MAYBE NO Explanation: F't Q O I T t o n.i, Q 1J ea 4-1r .c3.S �t t_ c,: C 1,Y 60�+ c; e, L O c A od L'7 Coca s t -r}+, 5_ ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? QAa.v..111�. oa_ OEV ri PMeN�— WI LA— �� 1 N c:LA.) OS® YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE N(� (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ,>< YET- MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: mW LY TIA Q. 1,1 AM G CLS A SSoti 1ck"rE0 W T N ' t) L-t% — FAMILY t.)5e. . ( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need fornew or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? 1( YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? yp YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? � YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X. YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? )1' YES ?MAYBE NO Explanation: .)USTI(v G Sr_2VICf M14Y 1.5 riA�E„ ( 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO , (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? �C V MAYBE Far Explanation: cocL Ttaogcr Os.&,ps pE Mut.T1- 1ANI1t..,Y NovseNG (16) Utilities; Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? 01vA‘bnCleor'. A^T ea OP TY YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? AVAet.a®Le_ Al enQPftvrh+ . X YES MAYBE NO r (c) Water? Ay Alt, A(aLi` eeo \ iLoPf'tt'ri' YES MAYBE NO • • (d) Sewer or septic tanks?SemNa—i YA4LA6�6. A i ()(lAe `B YES • }N MAYBE 0 (e)' Storm water drainage? • YES MAYBE N1 . (f) Solid waste and disposal? • • )( •• • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: vSL 1TCAA9 ftC.C321Ji61-+Bd7 1—e S69.1110E F (^1'-.,i V N r 1'S . • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any! health hazard ,or, potential health hazard (excluding menial health)? �C P-ES ' MAYBE NTl Explanation: • (18) Aeslthetics'. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any; scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an-aesthetically offensive site open to public view? �( YES MAYBE • NO Explanation: LoC-cri °' IS •oc4 tA0114.- ode LA S 9 USN Qt.A-rmAV (19) Recreation.; Will the proposal result in an impact upon the • quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? , YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: C5i4Llp it®a. 1" ti„. Iwc6.. .Stto PoeULi'x`i as • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? '\ YES MAYBE TO— Ex.p;lanation: . • • • • • III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the besj of�m• knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that/ lea¢ agen ma thdraw .any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in r fiance on this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or w' l ful 1 k of ful losure on my part. Propone t, ��rJ" " ` (signed) Arthur D. Swanson -• .. (name printed) • • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I _ • Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON ---- - COUNTY OF KING ss. PUBLIC HEARING ,- CE OF RENTON LAND USE.. : Mar a r e t Ha rb a ug h • : HEARING EXAMINER' being first duly sworn on RENTON,WASHINGTON ' - :. A`:.'PUBLIC'HEARING she i Chief Clerk :_ -WILL. BE HELD-BY THE oath,deposes and says that s the of RENTON LAND USE THE RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) HEARING.EXAMINER AT times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and HIS REGULAR MEETING has been for more'than six months prior to the date of publication referred IN •THE COUNCIL.CRAM- to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- BERS, CITY HALL, RE- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, NTON,WASHINGTON,ON and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained • •' May'30,1978,AT 9:00 AM. at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton :TO CONSIDER THE FOL- Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the LOWING PETITIONS: Sup:rior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 1.STANLEY E.STONE, I . APPLICATION FOR RE- Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public ZONE FROM G TO R-3, File No.R-165-78;prop- .erty located approxi- . Hearin mately 650 feet south of N.E. 4th Street west of II • Union.Avenue N.E.,bet- I as it was published in regular issues(and := -ween existing Green- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period - wood Cemetery and ex- ' • sing City of Renton ' propel. . 1 2: ARTHUR D. of consecutive issues,commencing on the SWANSON, APPLICA- TION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1; File. 12 day of May ,19 78 ,and ending the No. R-167-78; property located along the south • side of N.E. 4th Street' • adjacent to the northeast day of ,19 both dates corner of Greenwood inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- Cemetery. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 3. M A R V I N D . WEHRMAN, APPLICA • - charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $. 1•68which TION FOR REZONE has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the FROM G TO B-1; File first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent No. R-166-78; property insertion. located approximately 480 feet south of N.E.4th . /7'f Street, west of Union ..1.1.1 re C.4 1 Avenue N.E.,directly ad- jacent to the southwest • Chief Clerk corner of the existing Prairie Market facility. Legal descriptions of Subscribed and sworn to before me this l2 day of files noted above on file the Renton Planning • Department. May , 19 7 8 D PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS PETITIONS • ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- -e./ C-� SENT AT THE PUBLIC Notary Pu i and for the State o Washington, HEARING ON May 30,1978 • residing at Kent, King County. AT 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. . - I GORDON Y. ERICKSEN RENTON' PLANNING /1j —Passed by the L gislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June DIRECTOR ' 9th, 1955. Published In The Renton 1 Record-Chronicle May 12, —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, 1978. R4939 f` 1 adopted by the newspapers of the State. e:( . . 1 �:/. • .,.. �. N G D� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON May 30, , 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . STANLEY E. STONE, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-3, File No. R-165-78; property located approximately 650 feet south of N.E. 4th Street west of Union Avenue N.E. , between existing Greenwood Cemetery and existing City of Renton property. 2. ARTHUR D. SWANSON, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 ; File No. R-167-78; property located along the south side of N.E. 4th Street adjacent to the northeast corner of • Greenwood Cemetery. 3. MARVIN D. WEHRMAN, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 ; File No. R-166-78; property located approximately 480 feet south of N.E. 4th Street, west of Union Avenue N.E. ; directly adjacent to the southwest corner of the existing Prairie Market facility. Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. P ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON_ May 30, 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . ----- I.: GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED May 19, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION • I , Steve Munson , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED 'BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to beforee , a Notary Public , onn the /a`f day of_D�77 , SIGNED . j22e e; • 4 ISO aft 41 ' THE CITY OF RENTON V 0 `03: MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 115 235-2550 0 �4 D SEPPE�O May 1978 Mr. Arthur D. Swanson 45121 Talbot Road South Renton, Washington 98055 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-I ; File Number R-167-78; property located along the south side of N.E. 4th Street adjacent to the northeast corner of Greenwood Cemetery. Dear Mr. Swanson: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 17, 1978 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 30, 1978 at 9:00 AM . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . Alllinterested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director //4(47J- 4( Mic ocnner ! I i. :' _ ROUTE SCHEDULE 1 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 0/71 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: 4- J° -/ "1 REZONE imeruut2 SW sok MAJOR PLAT H SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT..OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 7 SIGNATURE ! OR INIT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDIfWG 3 -5---7cb TRAFFIC E .i 17 ENGINEERI 5-8 7P „ I /t/ '� k bef • HEALTH 4 I 671p L-iT►Lr\ )( REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : I • PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W. : • , • • NH I: 1 . 1 0/7g ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department • 2 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) (M(c AL- Sw(i?-►4 . SUBJECT : Reivi ew of ECF- 337-7k ; Application No . : /2-(C-7-762 Action Name : Aia-I-llyft, SwixN .),.3 reC-Zon3 r c1 6-l Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 1.01/4/ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e3GJ - Comments : i Ai, SignatureA'approirector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 72 /, � Comments : /.1i,,es r I- S.C, /v1 /�/— L� je,>=Quii2Gi"7G`�.j.S /-7tiD `-4 i A.,/Z .flul�_ip /.A- - :o�, ' 47-------71 c-5V5V7 cl Signature of . Director or Au horized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) 1 110 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : , Department : Comments : Lezcie o�pc s;�ive. c�r�;n� � l'cre/ss ecimod ai e-7 '7• 1-7 // rep/if-ea/ i27e.aei?5 o/c/.sclIr7,n`� rce-0.2 c�'� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : uT«i Comments: �r'.c,�/ ,,.. rl 1?11 I':.i'? up, .i of ,cIri Awe $1?•) . `�1„1'; .•..• STb V-1'I i /1' S, (3-Y-)1 Y et_N.L1 c v �til5 crr� 1��ilv 0.-4.- p l vx ! L,10,0 k Ova c. lv1Tl� CovL(�yz�c�l�5 `�}� .7;-.2-t - -- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : I. , Department : Tv'a /-c:c r c -y- , .cy Comments : �J Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date