HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-R-Arborist-2015-10-14-Greenforest Inc
Greenforest
Incorporated
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
A
r
b
o
r
i
s
t
4547
South
Lucile
Street,
Seattle,
WA
98118
Tel.
206-‐723-‐0656
October
14,
2015
Kent
Khnor
26721
106th
Ave
SW
Kent
WA
98030
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
You
contracted
my
services
as
a
consulting
arborist.
My
assignment
is
to:
1. Inspect
and
inventory
5
significant
trees
as
shown
on
preliminary
tree
retention
plan.
2. Confirm
significant
tree
quantity
on
site.
3. Record
tree
species,
diameter,
dripline
and
visible
defects.
4. Assess
tree
health
and
structure.
5. Prepare
a
written
report
of
findings.
I
received
a
preliminary
tree
retention
plan
from
Ivana
Halvorsen,
of
Barghausen
Consulting
Engineers,
Inc.,
locating
5
significant
trees.
I
visited
the
site
10/6/15
and
performed
a
field
inspection.
The
site
is
flat
and
covered
mostly
in
unmanaged
brambles.
I
inspected
the
5
surveyed
trees
plus
an
additional
2
trees
of
significant
size,
which
are
the
subject
of
this
report.
Six
of
the
7
trees
are
Douglas-‐fir,
and
range
in
size
from
6
to
30
inches
DBH.
The
seventh
tree
is
a
red
alder.
TREE
INSPECTION
–
Tree
Health,
Condition
and
Viability
I
marked
each
tree
with
1”
x
3.5”
aluminum
tag
indicating
tree
number.
I
visually
inspected
each
tree
from
the
ground
and
rated
both
tree
health
and
structure.
A
tree’s
structure
is
distinct
from
its
health.
This
inspection
identifies
what
is
visible
with
both.
Structure
is
the
way
the
tree
is
put
together
or
constructed,
and
identifying
obvious
defects
can
be
helpful
in
determining
if
a
tree
is
predisposed
to
failure.
Tree
health
assesses
disease,
insect
infestation
and
old
age.
No
invasive
procedures
were
performed
on
any
trees.
The
results
of
this
inspection
are
based
on
what
was
visible
at
the
time
of
the
inspection.
Kent
Khnor
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
October
14,
2015
Page
2
of
7
Greenforest
Registered
Consulting
Arborist
The
table
below
summarizes
my
inspection
results
and
provides
the
following
information
for
each
tree:
Tree
number
as
shown
on
tag
in
the
field.
Tree
Species
Common
name.
DBH
Stem
diameter
in
inches
measured
4.5
feet
from
the
ground.
Dripline
Average
branch
extension
from
the
trunk
as
radius
in
feet.
Tree
Class
Tree,
Significant:
A
tree
with
a
caliper
of
at
least
six
inches
(6"),
or
an
alder
or
cottonwood
tree
with
a
caliper
of
at
least
eight
inches
(8").
Tree,
Landmark:
A
tree
with
a
caliper
of
thirty
inches
(30")
or
greater.
Tree
Status
Indicates
if
tree
will
be
saved
or
removed.
Dangerous,
Dead
Or
Viable?
Tree,
Dangerous:
Any
tree
that
has
been
certified
as
dead,
terminally
diseased,
damaged,
or
otherwise
dangerous
to
persons
or
property
by
a
licensed
landscape
architect,
or
certified
arborist,
and
for
healthy
trees,
a
determination
by
the
arborist
whether
the
tree
is
viable
for
retention.
Visible
defects
Obvious
structural
defects
or
diseases
visible
at
time
of
inspection.
One
tree
has
been
injured
repeatedly
with
a
hatchet.
Its
trunk
is
wounded
and
it
is
the
only
tree
not
viable
for
retention.
A
couple
dozen
red
alders
are
growing
along
the
east
side
of
the
site,
though
only
1
is
of
significant
size.
Tree
No.
Species
DBH
Dripline
Tree
Class
Status:
Save
Or
Remove
Dangerous,
Dead
Or
Viable?
Visible
Defects
1
Douglas-‐fir
20”
14'
Significant
Remove
Dangerous
Hatchet
injury
on
trunk;
sequoia
pitch
moth
infestation.
2
Douglas-‐fir
16”
12’
Significant
Remove
Viable
3
Douglas-‐fir
12”
16’
Significant
Remove
Viable
4
Douglas-‐fir
30”
18’
Landmark
Remove
Viable
5
Douglas-‐fir
28”
16’
Significant
Remove
Viable
6
Douglas-‐fir
6”
6’
Significant
Remove
Viable
7
Red
alder
9”
12’
Significant
Remove
Viable
Kent
Khnor
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
October
14,
2015
Page
3
of
7
Greenforest
Registered
Consulting
Arborist
Minimum
Tree
Density
For
detached
single-‐family
development,
two
(2)
significant
trees
are
required
for
every
five
thousand
(5,000)
sq.
ft.
of
lot
area,
or
the
gross
equivalent
of
caliper
inches
provided
by
one
(1)
or
more
retained
tree.
Since
no
trees
are
retained,
supplemental
trees
are
necessary
to
meet
the
minimum
tree
density
requirement.
The
following
table
lists
the
proposed
7
lots
by
number,
size
(SF),
minimum
significant
tree
requirement,
new
trees
proposed
for
each
Lot,
retained
trees
on
each
Lot,
and
compliance
with
the
minimum
tree
density
requirement.
Fifteen
supplemental
trees
are
required
for
compliance.
Lot
Size
(SF)
Min.
Significant
Trees
Required
New
Trees1
Retained
Trees
Compliant
1
5002
2
2
0
Yes
2
5741
2
2
0
Yes
3
5890
2
2
0
Yes
4
6075
2
2
0
Yes
5
5658
2
2
0
Yes
6
5657
2
2
0
Yes
7
6453
3
3
0
Yes
The
project
landscape
architect
shall
address
location,
species,
planting
and
maintenance
specifications
for
supplemental
trees
under
separate
cover.
The
smaller
Doug-‐firs
and
alder
trees
proposed
for
removal
stand
alone
on
this
parcel
(1,
2,
3,
6,
7,).
Only
smaller
trees
and
brambles
surround
them.
There
are
no
nearby
trees
that
will
remain,
either
on
this
site
or
on
adjoining
parcels
that
could
be
impacted
by
their
removal.
The
two
trees
within
the
right-‐of-‐way
are
edge
trees
(4,
5),
and
have
been
pruned
heavily
because
of
adjacent
overhead
power
lines.
East
of
these
two
trees
is
a
stand
of
other
mature
Douglas-‐fir
on
the
adjoining
parcels.
Although
all
these
trees
are
in
a
contiguous
canopy
group,
they
have
sufficient
spacing
to
allow
good
trunk
taper
and
moderate
live
crown
ratios.
Further,
mature
trees
across
the
street
to
the
west
will
continue
to
provide
wind
buffer.
The
impact
to
adjacent
trees
will
be
negligible
to
minor
from
the
removal
of
the
two
ROW
trees.
1
When
the
required
number
of
protected
trees
cannot
be
retained,
replacement
trees,
with
at
least
a
two-‐inch
(2")
caliper
or
an
evergreen
at
least
six
feet
(6')
tall,
shall
be
planted.
Kent
Khnor
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
October
14,
2015
Page
4
of
7
Greenforest
Registered
Consulting
Arborist
Thank
you
for
your
business.
Please
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
Sincerely,
GreenForest,
Inc.
By
Favero
Greenforest,
M.
S.
ISA
Certified
Arborist
#
PN
-‐0143A
ASCA
Registered
Consulting
Arborist®
#379
ISA
Tree
Risk
Assessment
Qualified
Attachments:
1. Assumptions
and
Limiting
Conditions
2. Color
Images
of
Site
3. Site
Plan
Kent
Khnor
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
October
14,
2015
Page
5
of
7
Greenforest
Registered
Consulting
Arborist
Attachment
No.
1
-‐
Assumptions
&
Limiting
Conditions
1) A
field
examination
of
the
site
was
made
10/6/15.
My
observations
and
conclusions
are
as
of
that
date.
2) Care
has
been
taken
to
obtain
all
information
from
reliable
sources.
All
data
has
been
verified
insofar
as
possible;
however,
the
consultant/arborist
can
neither
guarantee
nor
be
responsible
for
the
accuracy
of
information
provided
by
others.
3) The
consultant/appraiser
shall
not
be
required
to
give
testimony
or
to
attend
court
by
reason
of
this
report
unless
subsequent
contractual
arrangements
are
made.
4) Loss
or
alteration
of
any
part
of
this
report
invalidates
the
entire
report.
5) Unless
required
by
law
otherwise,
possession
of
this
report
or
a
copy
thereof
does
not
imply
right
of
publication
or
use
for
any
purpose
by
any
other
than
the
person
to
whom
it
is
addressed,
without
the
prior
expressed
written
or
verbal
consent
of
the
consultant/appraiser.
6) This
report
and
any
values/opinions
expressed
herein
represent
the
opinion
of
the
consultant/appraiser,
and
the
consultant’s/appraiser’s
fee
is
in
no
way
contingent
upon
the
reporting
of
a
specified
value,
a
stipulated
result,
the
occurrence
of
a
subsequent
event,
nor
upon
any
finding
to
be
reported.
7) Construction
activities
can
impact
trees
in
unpredictable
ways.
All
retained
trees
should
be
inspected
at
the
competition
of
construction,
and
regularly
thereafter
as
part
of
ongoing
maintenance.
Kent
Khnor
RE:
Arborist
Report,
Boun
Short
Plat,
Parcel
No.
1023059139
October
14,
2015
Page
6
of
7
Greenforest
Registered
Consulting
Arborist
Attachment
No.
2
–
Color
Images
of
Site
BOUN SHORT PLAT BOUN SHORT PLATKent Khnor
RE: Arborist Report, Boun Short Plat, Parcel No. 1023059139
October 14, 2015
Page 7 of 7
Attachment No. 3 – Site Plan