Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA02-120 l / ' CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 6, 2003 • TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Holly SUBJECT: Land Use File Close-Out Please complete the following information to facilitate project close-out and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. VG/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/O/4/4/4/4/4/®/4/4/4/®/®/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/O/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/Oq oProject Name: Sign Code Amendment o o LUA(File) Number: LUA-02-120, ECF o oCross References: AKA's: N/A o / Project Manager: Gil Cerise Acceptance Date: October 25, 2002 0 o/ eApplicant:,City of Renton Owner: // Contact: Gil Cerise PID#: d ii ERC Approval/Denial (circle one) & Date: November 12, 2002 n 0 ERC Appeal Date: December 5, 2002 0 o Public Hearing Date: N/A Appeal Period Ends: N/A o d Date Appealed to HE & By Whom: N/A a oo HE Decision & Date: N/A 0 o Date Appealed to Council & By Whom: N/A o o, oCouncil Decision & Date: N/A Mylar Recording #: 9 °;o Project Description: SIGN CODE AMENDMENT-TO ALLOW LARGE RETAIL USES OVER 350,000 SQ. o o FT. WITHIN THE VALLEY PLANNING AREA TO HAVE A FREESTANDING SIGN OF UP TO 115 FEET IN d 0 HEIGHT. CURRENT CODE RESTRICTS HEIGHT OF SUCH SIGNS TO 60 FEET a 3 o Location: a $ Comments: 0 o, 0 g L; 0 0/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/.P/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/46 Setup _ Amends ORD 4577 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4990 kN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT. REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON," TO ALLOW FREESTANDING SIGN HEIGHT OF 115 FEET, FOR BIG BOX RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS OF 350,000 SQUARE FEET IN BUILDING AREA OR MORE,IN THE EMPLOYMENT AREA VALLEY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-4-100.E.5.e.ii of Chapter 4, "City-Wide Property Development Standards,"of Title IV(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as follows• ii. Big Box Retail Uses with over 350,000 square feet of total building area located in the E ployment Area Valley: Big box retail uses with over 350,000 square feet in total building area located in the Employment Area Valley may install: Large Freestanding Signs: One on-premises freestanding sign not to exceed one hundred fifteen feet (115') in height and seven hundred(700) square feet per face, and another such sign not to exceed forty feet(40')in height and four hundred(400) square feet per face; and • Roof Signs: One roof-mounted sign per building of up to four hundred(400) square feet not to exceed twenty feet(20') in height above the parapet wall and not to exceed two(2) such signs per retail center; and 1 • - ORDINANCE NO. 4990 • Additional Freestanding Signs: Two (2) on-premises freestanding signs per street frontage, no more than eight feet (8')tall and no more than one hundred (100) square feet per side. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of December , 2002. G( O Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of December , 2002. Jet: Tanner, Mayor Approved a to form: Lawrence J. Warren, ity Attorney Date of Publication: 12/13/2002 ORD.1014:11/08/02:ma • - -771111111.1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL-REVIEW 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee - a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of " has issued a Determination of •Non- . general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of Significance for the following project publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily under the authority, of the Renton, newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a Municipal Code. legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. SIGN CODE AMENDMENT j 0,ECF The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and Proposed amen Proposed amendments to section not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below ' 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton stated period. The annexed notice,a Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs. Location: Sign Code Amendment r Employment Area Valley. Appeals of the environmental as published on: 11/18/02 determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$66.75,charged to December 2,-2002. Appeals must be Acct. No.8051067. filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:, . Exof The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. ' Hearing 1055 Soutthh Grady raady y City Way, Re Renton, nton, WA Legal Number 848583 ,= 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are I 9 ' governed by City of Renton Municipal d,/ Code Section 4-8-110. Additional `,r. , information regarding the appeal Legal Clerk, S County Journal process may be obtained from the . ' Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430- 6510. //1% : Published in the South County �---- Subscribed and sworn before me on this I -y of 10 ,2002 ; Journal November 18,2002.848583 oW111111/////, Vliteti ' if. �\‘‘N Pk A L L. Cq /// Notary Public of the State of Washington . `\��`�0 .sSIUN E�Asq�.,,' O�VE,OpM residing in Renton IOTA CI�OF E �NNIn/ King County,Washington a . _ N Ry ON G —•— _ m,�• Z v i N:� j oBL\c *a;; : 6'11,., ////7„P TWA S N�l..�`, / CITY O:F RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the l c day of !OUQvv\(2.4 , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing F./i2Lin v vNAl 1 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Se-C- /114cat,2-J ..b,s • • (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I (know or have satisfactory evidence that 41-e e -e- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. L �? Dated: 1 Z� f�� •2-- • �� Ct-ti tNOTARY MARILYN KAMCHEEF Notary PV-ubli and for the State of ashington PUBLIC Notary(Print) tAMuyN KAme,HEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointment a lmmat 4TMENT EXPIRES:6 20 03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 Projec erne:- SfJ 1M (41cL.11),0 o e,U` ! - _ems ' l Project Number: L—Lt/9 (? 2, — )ae1 Ec NOTARY.DOC AGENCY(DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology j Washington Dept. of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section Habitat Program Attn. SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard 39015— 172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Mill Creek,WA 98012 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman Attn: Ramin Pazooki 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 PO Box 330310 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Real Estate Services PO Box C-3755 j KC Wastewater Treatment Division Seattle Public Utilities Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Suite 4900, Key Tower Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 700 Fifth Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager City of Tukwila Metro Transit ' PO Box 90868 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street MS: XRD-01W Tukwila,WA 98188 KSC-TR-0431 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Seattle,WA 981;04-3856 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the following agencies and cities!will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. Also note, do not mail David Dietzman any of the notices he gets his from the web. Only send him the ERC Determination paperwork. Last printed 10/22/02 3:57 PM i ; _ lir. • \ �' ' _�eii, , i ,, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION r PROJECT NAME: LARGE FREESTANDING SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-120,ECF i Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii,of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to applyonlyto big.opsdlonessodoeaefsd �sgtttaufProeCde amedmntwu als alow square etenin sign to be a mximmo 115 feet in height. This Is an Increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. Location:Applicable to projects of a certain size and use type In the Employment Area Valley. THE OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMTTEE (ERC)HAS DETER TY THAT TIHE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SS GN FICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ONMINED ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. • • B.EaPL0Y4CE!lfAaEA VALLEY: I ' L �Ta' l1lYiTui c!g .117413 ■ �d ip P:Y l a►l 91R',' spirg 'ia'1: Ads r..�- arc ■ • IitiFi f - .it 14:L f • \I WIMP � 1 , r =1�� In ire i E .. 0 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISAT(42530- 00. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. . • • • CERTIFICATION I, c?+'( Cer , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • they described property on `I�b ve f, er I S 120 vZ • Signed:` 2 C �G?��2�� ATTEST:Subscribed a orn before me,a Notary Pub c,m and for th tote of W .:.•gttsid'ingg 8-v► ,on the g day of (J� • o'�(J O� MARILYN 1(1-WC IE,FF OT Y PUBLIC MARILYN il�Yl�9 I�+,iUIC'r9El= SKATE®F WASHING 6Qa�I MY1�I�EOi�l` IVIEf�l�'EXPIRES: 6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES i JUNE 29, 2003 December 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 473 Associates (CPA 2002-M-07),File No.R-01-162. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/16/2002. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4989 An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2003 for Finance: 2003 Property Tax both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY Levy NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4990 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development 1" Planning: Employment Area Standards,of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code to allow a , ; Valley,Freestanding Sign Code freestanding sign height of 115 feet,for big-box retail developments of 350,000 ` Amendment square feet in building area or more,in the Employment Area Valley. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL I� ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. e CARRIED. = ' Ordinance,#4991 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Planning: Urban Center Design Overlay Districts,of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code to apply Overlay Regulations, Urban Center Design Guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four units, and Application to Small Multi- to properties rezoned from Commercial Office (CO)to Center Downtown(CD) Family Projects and Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM-U) as a result of the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4992 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-3-050 of Chapter 3,Environmental Utility: Aquifer Protection Regulations and Special Districts; Section 4-4-060 of Chapter 4, Property Code Amendments Development Standards; Section 4-8-120 of Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; and Section 4-9-015 of Chapter 9, Procedures and Review Criteria; of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code by amending aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Stating that she attended the Maplewood Glen neighborhood sign dedication, Development Services: Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported a problem concerning the blockage of Temporary Signs Obscuring the new neighborhood sign by temporary real estate signs. MOVED BY Established Neighborhood KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE Signs ISSUE OF TEMPORARY SIGNS NEAR ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD SIGNS TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Fagan— Councilman Clawson noted the receipt of a letter from Rick Fagan,Director of Temporary Office Space Fagan Recovery Solutions,23220 Maple Valley Hwy., Suite 204,Maple Valley, Donation ' 98038, concerning the recent closing of the Cedar Hills Substance Abuse Treatment Center due to King County's budgetary constraints. Mr. Fagan reported that while he is negotiating with King County to acquire the facility, temporary office space is needed; and he requested that the City donate December 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 473 Ordinance#4�89 An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2003 for Finance: 2003 Property Tax both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY Levy NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. [. Ordinance#4990 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4,City-Wide Property Development Planning: Employment Area Standards,of Title N(Development Regulations)of City Code to allow a Valley,Freestanding Sign freestanding sign height of 115 feet,for big-box retail developments of 350,000 Code Amendment square feet in building area or more,in the Employment Area Valley. MOVED i,u.F1 0 z- 120 BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4991 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Planning:Urban Center Overlay Districts,of Title N(Development Regulations)of City Code to apply Design Overlay Regulations, Urban Center Design Guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four units, Application to�Small Multi- and to properties rezoned from Commercial Office(CO)to Center Downtown Family Projec (CD)and Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM-U)as a result of the South Lu A o/- 12-1 Renton Neighborhood Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4992 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-3-050 of Chapter 3,Environmental Utility:Aquifer Protection Regulations and Special Districts; Section 4-4-060 of Chapter 4,Property Code Amendments Development Standards; Section 4-8-120 of Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; L1AA 02-p11 and Section 4-9-015 of Chapter 9,Procedures and Review Criteria; of Title N (Development Regulations)of City Code by amending aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Stating that she attended the Maplewood Glen neighborhood sign dedication, Development Services: Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported a problem concerning the blockage Temporary Signs Obscuring of the new neighborhood sign by temporary real estate signs. MOVED BY Established Neighborhood KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE Signs ISSUE OF TEMPORARY SIGNS NEAR ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD SIGNS TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment:Fagan— Councilman Clawson noted the receipt of a letter from Rick Fagan,Director of Temporary Office Space Fagan Recovery Solutions,23220 Maple Valley Hwy., Suite 204,Maple Donation Valley, 98038,concerning the recent closing of the Cedar Hills Substance Abuse Treatment Center due to King County's budgetary constraints. Mr. Fagan reported that while he is negotiating with King County to acquire the facility,temporary office space is needed; and he requested that the City donate temporary office space. Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry,Mayor Tanner reported that Community Services Administrator Jim Shepherd will respond to Mr.Fagan's letter informing him of the City's inability to provide the office space;however, he commended Mr.Fagan on his efforts to continue the treatment center. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler suggested that the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department may be able to assist Mr. Fagan in obtaining an office space donation. I December 2,29102 Renton City Council Minutes Page 461 $3,112,154.54, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the I contract. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry regarding the completion date,Chief Administrative Officer estimated that Fire Station#12 will be constructed by the end of 2003 or early 2004. I I *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending concurrence Utility:Aquifer Protection in the recommendation of staff that the Council adopt the proposed Code Amendments amendments to the City's aquifer protection regulations. The Committee 1, i -DI- p2 - bt c1 further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for /•+�' first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for I ordinance.) Planning&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee I report regarding the proposed Urban Center Design Overlay Regulation Code Planning:Urban Center amendments. The Committee recommended that the Code amendments be Design Overlay Regulations, approved and the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. Application to Small Multi- MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL Family Projects CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for UA Oi'(2 I ordinance.) Planning: Employment Area Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Valley,Freestanding Sign report regarding the proposed large freestanding Sign Code amendments in the Code Amendment Employment Area Valley. The Committee reviewed the proposed amendments and associated issue papers and exhibits on November 7,2002. There was a L U,A " 07 - I Z O public hearing held on November 18,2002,and public hearing comments were closed on December 2,2002, after the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) process was completed. III The Committee recommended that the Code amendments be approved and that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for ordinance.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3604 A resolution was read approving the Geneva Court Final Plat consisting of Plat: Geneva Court,Talbot Rd approximately 3.63 acres located in the vicinity of 5310 Talbot Rd. S. (FP-02- S(FP-02-114)' 114). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3605 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation:Freight Action agreement with the Freight Action Strategy(FAST)Partnership,Phase II, Strategy(FAST)MOU entitled"Memorandum of Understanding Among the Principal Parties of the FAST Corridor." MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. I The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 12/09/2002 for second and final reading: I Finance: 2003 Property Tax An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2003 for Levy both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY I December 2,20102 Renton City Council Minutes Page 462 1 PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. Planning: Employment Area An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Valley,Freestanding Sign Standards,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code to allow a Code Amendment freestanding sign height of 115 feet, for big-box retail developments of 350,000 10611, M j square feet in building area or more,in the Employment Area Valley. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. [ ---.. Planning:Urban Center An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Design Overlay Regulations, Overlay Districts,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code to apply Application to Small Multi- Urban Center Design Guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four units, Family Projects and to properties rezoned from Commercial Office(CO)to Center Downtown " (CD)and Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM-U)as a result of the South L '02 -1 i Renton Neighborhood Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, I SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. Utility:Aquifer Protection An ordinance was read amending Section 4-3-050 of Chapter 3,Environmental Code Amendments Regulations and Special Districts; Section 4-4-060 of Chapter 4,Property Development Standards; Section 4-8-120 of Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; L1t -01 - 0i9 and Section 4-9-015 of Chapter 9,Procedures and Review Criteria; of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code by amending aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4988 An ordinance was read providing for the 2002 year-end Budget adjustments in Finance: 2002 Year-End the amount of$8,263,407. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY Budget Adjustments CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Nelson opened nominations for 2003 Council President. Council: 2003 Council MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ELECT President Election(Keolker- COUNCILWOMAN KEOLKER-WHEELER AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT Wheeler) FOR 2003. CARRIED. Council: 2003 Council Council President Nelson opened nominations for 2003 Council President Pro President Pro Tem(Persson) Tern. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ELECT COUNCILMAN PERSSON AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM FOR 2003. CARRIED. Community Services: Library MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL REFER Staffing,Non-Resident THE FOLLOWING TOPICS TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES Recreation Fees,Human COMMITTEE: 2003 LIBRARY STAFFING,20%NON-RESIDENT Services Funding RECREATION FEES INCREASE,AND THE HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING REQUEST BECAUSE OF KING COUNTY CUTBACKS. ' CARRIED. 1 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: December 3, 2002 To: Gil Cerise From:1 Jennifer Henning RV 4v/1 Environmental Review Committee Subject: Sign Code Amendment LUA-02-120, ECF ERC Appeal Period We just wanted to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments Determination of Non-Significance. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7286. ! rl . . JOT1QE ' ., ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: LARGE FREESTANDING SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-120, ECF • Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to apply only to big- box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in the Employment Area Valley. Proposed code amendments would also allow one large freestanding sign to be a maximum of 115 feet in height. This is an increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. Location:Applicable to projects of a certain size and use type in the Employment Area Valley. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. • B. EMPLOYMENT AREA VALLEY: � • s J\ wlllll'1�Illil1-4.'j� U/gthunr!� 1 7 1111 1Wrill III . V.Q111?14210:. t Mit 1 C \ Ilk! — "&/111k4 i,W ittg. , :,.* , 1:36)1\it ib"' -, sirlipill,Wckrttr, : 1 -ee Mil* -- 1 ..., iiiiii,oi i:"Ali ',\".4.),,,,,,_::, ofihil="rili.- ...,.., AlAging 1 q‘ ,ogyaiiw*--1 Ilics lir p-,1410,,,z 11111 ' ! —•i -i!■, It , i "1� + r IPi� r 1 :_i am at.,,,:t „.._. c.-1 _imp, ort. - — NW-( v i .1-\)--e0:3 1 l .1 11 -�,4, )I J, .7ssst ! 1 z.i. , 1 ,.er y li j W MI . l ' ._J_i— 46 .:. ,n • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT;REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include:hhe'project,NUMBER 4.ell.caliing for proper�file.identification. 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SIGN CODE AMENDMENT LUA-02-120,ECF Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs. Location: Employment Area Valley. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: November 18, 2002 Account No. 51067 dnspub •• CITY C RENTON 44',cre Plannin uildin ublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor November 15, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental.Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on November 12, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE LARGE FREESTANDING SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-02-120, ECF Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to apply only to big-box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in the Employment Area Valley. Proposed code amendments would also allow one large freestanding sign to be a maximum of 115 feet in height. This is an increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. Location: Applicable to projiects of a certain size and use type in the Employment Area Valley. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. • If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, (.1j4.-1 f 62442e Gil Cerise Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure Agency hAtt,I.JuL\ R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-120, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Large Freestanding Sign Code Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to apply only to big-box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in the Employment Area Valley. Proposed code amendments would also allow one large freestanding sign to be a maximum of 115 feet in height. This is an increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Applicable to projects of a certain size and use type in the Employment Area Valle LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 18, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: November 12,2002 SIGNATURS: / j regg‘mreelapridigfro. DATE/ /Z/�De artmenin /Buildin /Public Works P9 9 C • Jim Shepherd,AdministilAtor DATE Co munity Services Department //`-/X—e Lee er, ire C ' f DATE Ren on Fire Department dnssignature CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: November 12, 2002 To: Gil cerise Pep From: Jennifer Henning 4"'1N Environmental Review Committee Subject: Large Freestanding Sign Code Amendments LUA-02-120, ECF On behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), I would like to inform you that they have completed their review of your project. The Committee, on November 12, 2002, decided that the project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 430-7286. dnsmm I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-120, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Large Freestanding Sign Code Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to apply only to big-box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in the Employment Area Valley. Proposed code amendments would also allow one large freestanding sign to be a maximum of 115 feet in height. This is an increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. LOCATION!OF PROPOSAL: Applicable to projects of a certain size and use type in the Employment Area Valle I LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction May be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December12,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 18, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 2002 SIGNATURES: 99 Z'�/ dfi"rf � //�/Z/ 2- re im er an i is a or DATE Departmei PI Wing/Building/Public Works yik /CK,3(cr im Shepherd, Administ for DATE Co munity Services Department 4L //E-yI Lee er, ire Ch' f AT Ren on Fire Department dnssignature STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: 11/12/02 Project Name: Large Freestanding Sign Code Amendments Project Number: LUA 02-120, ECF Project Manager: Gil Cerise Project Description: Proposed amendments to section 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. of Renton Municipal Code dealing with large freestanding signs would change the applicability of this section of code to apply only to big-box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in the Employment Area Valley. Proposed code amendments would also allow one large freestanding sign to be a maximum of 115 feet in height. This is an increase of 55 feet over the existing maximum of 60 feet. Project Location: Applicable to projects of a certain size and use type in the Employment Area Valley. Exist. Bldg.Area gsf: N/A Site Area: N/A B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON—SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED. X 1 Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None. This is a non-project action. As a non-project action no new physical development is anticipated because of this text modification. Documeut2 City of Renton EDNSP Department Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report Springbrook Associates Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone LUA-02-120,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 12,2002 Page2 of 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? NO IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED FROM THIS NON-PROJECT ACTION. NO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CODE TEXT AMENDMENT. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposalhas been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X , Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. (Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Document2 City of Remw., Department of Planning/Building/Public b- a ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 0 �V l CQS COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120,��"' ECF " DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 LOCATION: Employment Area Valley SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft. in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants _ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS N o Omni . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in orma ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. / n Signa Dir r Authorized Representaf e Date Routing i Rev.10/93 • City of Rel. Department of Planning/Building/Public V ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ust;=' COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 0 , APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGE GIL CERISE PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 LOCATION: Employment Area Valley SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 1'15 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. I A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air Aesthetics Water ! -Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ i Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CPS I1-12—O2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rel' Department of Planning/Building/Public VI _ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '?A v Ic S COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE R CE V t U PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 2002 LOCATION: Employment Area Valley OCT SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A CITY OF REST i;;R{ r SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability fromUN►TY properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the I Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources \ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet p11/1;)),A___ / ��, 2, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS aAjeVjk., ors IO 7 ��/Go, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 40,a— tip Crirt /(,(Aid faVAZ0 We Piave reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher additional information needed to properly assess this proposal. r, AW2 (,,K /0 3 / dD---- Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Re' Department of Planning/Building/Public I ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT." l_OkS v1Gfi o1) ev vl C-e5 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,20�?yorR>rAror� APPLICANT: City of:Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE R E C E I V E PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 OCT 2 8 .2002 LOCATION: Employment Area Valley BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft. in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building areallocated in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 1 _ Housing Air 1 Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use i Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 1 1 1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We Have reviewedthis application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh/e additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. � 4 4-c1 76/37 S'%*ature of Direc r or Auth rized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public I - -' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—Fr S ?ov.� A-1 ©n COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 CITY OF RENTON APPLICANT: City of(Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERI i c El V E PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 ®CT 2002 LOCATION: Employment Area Valley SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A RI itLDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building areallocated in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 1115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air I Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Nam- I B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Nam- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We tiave reviewedrIthis application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionallj information is needed to properly assess this proposal. fi c ( Si na re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing i Rev.10/93 City of Re....,.. Department of Planning/Building/Public I ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT6 V14riti6S71,,cc l/ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002OFRENTON APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002" CEIVCD APPLICANT: City of(Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE OCT 2 8 2002 PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 BUILDING DIVISION LOCATION: Employment Area Valley SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cu/tural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS PJ awe C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS f' — We have reviewed Ilthis application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatiion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si re of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Routin Rev.10/93 i I City of Re::.:,:. Department of Planning/Building/Public U ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: of 7 If co ttnk- O n COMMENTS DUE: NOVEM 3-ER-�4- 2002 . _ }} L� APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28 2002�� -- U 1;1 APPLICANT: City of'Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE i ' PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 i:; It OCT!I 2 9 2002 !I '' J 1 { LOCATION: Employment Area Valley 1 I SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA toss``: N/! Ci_i Y OF RENTON 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building areal located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. I A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary . Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water I -Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8114 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I 4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMEN S �0 _ 0e,�cil ` • We Have r viewedjthis applic tion with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise a d have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh e additional inf ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. _.0042A01 10 2 7/‘2----- Sig at e of Director or Autho ed Representative Date Rout' g Rev.10/93 City of Rehwn Department of Planning/Building/Public VI ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tP) n ea v ?(„t) COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-120, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 I APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: GIL CERISE erre nr 91.-N rnry PROJECT TITLE: Sign Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77050 RECEIVED LOCATION: Employment Area Valley OCT 8 21102 SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A tst-ttLDiftf DiVlSION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 SqLFt.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft. of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 1I15 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth i Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ j Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet .e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. INV6,(V) It ell\WS)-- Sig a re of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Routing Rev.10/93 / 1 ti • 1 • •+ ,,t. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to'Gil Cerise,Senior Planner,Economic Development, • • .jvn0� • .1 Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 12,2002. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive I additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically NOTICE OF APPLICATION it • become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- CONTACT PERSON: GIL CERISE,(425)430-6578 SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE: I October28,2002 .. .- LAND USE NUMBER: i LUA402-120,ECF B.EMPLOYMENT AREA VALLEY: - APPLICATION NAME: SIGN CODE AMENDMENT S ( ��1u(iilllillj�W4`�,-'tiJ ku,r,' "�iw��n +I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: I Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4.4-100E.5.e,ll would change . t \••ram i'e;;,r/'yer.`,i,�, •r• applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.R.In developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box �:,,,..: r retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft.of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley.The proposal will also L•;v r �.;;_. 1E%_; Increase the height limit of large freestandingsign from 60 feet to 115 feet In order to allow sign visibilityabove tree line. Vd. PROJECT LOCATION: ' Employment Area Valley IFI sr� \ - �`- f li .0 ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton l4M, \` �' I .1�0 �"'r I ,. has determined that significant environmental Impacts are using unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as i `)�`= ��it^-F:i � permitted under the RCW 43.21 C-110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is i -r\ Y • likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integrated Into a single comment period. , 4ytn,•\ �">%i� G` '��. �_ �y Tw j�y 'f There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14- U, inn. .eu inelh. fir• I _CI�I._..• _�-'- etill° day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS. I �c�" !-L • 1.,..- �1 C� iii .IRa�It.C.r, t PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 25,2002 T�I r,_ '"':i."0'_' I IV • ., on ail �� • 1, :1.•c NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 28,2002 1 �',J ...11[1.... � �l •,L,r,-zN - Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review i r -t-feri - II J" t/�i • T 0. Other Permits which may be requiredi N/A ,ir�`�d a y}?+'. Requested Studies: 1 WA ��tl�.44' 'r 1111 ��- �: ��I - !raj■ � `"^7. Location where application may r I ��pI 1 ,�51t• I - c be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, -r Ii■�ig I ,,MI Y 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 1 4 n N, • ,-j PUBLIC HEARING: WA I � .y . • /—Q Lc�, I: �dddT9TTT--.TT1 r �' CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: - ,.-M _ Al-nalytical process • I �'P!� / kot This non-project action supports the vision embodied in the City of Renton • J_ '-r�,*-t•. -,'1 ri- �1," I Ir- • F. Comprehensive Plan and the City of Renton Business Plan Goals.The non- • project action allows taller signs for large-scale big•box retail uses in the City's Employment Area Valley,an area zoned for big-box retail uses. Land Use: N/A 1 Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: ' SEPA Checklist,Issue paper , It you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project,complete i this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Development Regulations Flle No/Name:LUA-02-120,ECF/Sign Code Amendment Used For Project Mitigation: WA NAME: Proposed Mitigation Measures: N/A ' ADDRESS: • 11 1 .,.TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION __-__,_-__- -- _- NOTICE OF APPLICATION _ - -_ CERTIFICATION I, 641 e _r7 e- , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby • the cried.property on Oe o er Z�1, 2-06 �— Signed` ) ate `! a 0 ATTEST:Subscribed a i s sw.rn be ore me,a Nota Public,in and forte o Washington-residing .i_A�ln, O ,on the d day of ( 6c . R'�..., PUBLIC t MARILYN KAMCHEFF j i SIIAT�OF N1/SN1�9 T f ib yMY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 'I COMMISSION EXPIRES t el+J ,t 29, 2003 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: i October 28, 2002 To: Gil Cerise, Senior PlannerC From: Andree DeBauw Subject: Project No. LUA-02-120, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on Nov.12, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your appication. Please contact me, at 430-7281, if you have any questions. acceptancememo . Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gil Cerise, Senior Planner, Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on . November 12, 2002. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. ' .CONTACT PERSON: GIL CERISE (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • • • B. EMPLOYMENT AREA VALLEY: i • , ".1`4.Mi4:tPc � , � , 'vim: �� 4l � g� _ C .k.AA \ i mit PI-1/4W,Ig"-s --r . m v!i!.,:i. 4.1,8„,7---,..,i. :-`---,:_-= ail" . mil *.b i � X �: 4EeNE mn i�, q 1 lA��.p _I n a.� L.; .....* 4. . ______ i - .,- al iiijk„.11 a 1,--1 i L gl __.. N , ,, ,t ii::',.:.. / • ) j �..�� Jt' u6e 4 a •1 " . / Ir, — r f AIL■ ■�"!I. 1,1— ��ir 1 I - .a`!t1 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to:City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File No/Name: LUA-02-120,ECF/Sign Code Amendment • NAME: ADDRESS: 'TELEPHONE NO.: , • i i NOTICE OF APPLICATION • • �ti�y 0'et) rll Y'P �� re NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 28,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-120,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SIGN CODE AMENDMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed Sign Code Amendment to RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii would change applicability from properties with over 450,000 Sq.Ft.in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales,to big box retail uses with over 350,000 Sq.Ft.of total building area located in the Employment Area Valley. The proposal will also increase the height limit of large freestanding sign from 60 feet to 115 feet in order to allow sign visibility above tree line. PROJECT LOCATION: Employment Area Valley OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton • has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as • • permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14- day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 25,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 28,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: N/A Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process This non-project action supports the vision embodied in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and the City of Renton Business Plan Goals. The non- project action allows taller signs for large-scale big-box retail uses in the City's Employment Area Valley,an area zoned for big-box retail uses. Land Use: N/A Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist,Issue paper Development Regulations • Used For Project Mitigation: WA • • Proposed Mitigation Measures: N/A • NOTICE OF APPLICATION ' r, i City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: IEVELOPMENT PLANNING �,p�_(y� v'14N�2 Cf �,'C N Le+r� OF RCPITON1-telita.N'D'WW1 'I'o2 RI4C 'f-/CDE,S.� ADDRESS: OCT 2 5 2002 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: NO( gi lr 8o L U S.I%S W r i0 eatn biAlccS CITY: ZIPRECEIVED G P�,,,g' , "I/A: TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: /� EXISTING LAND USE(S): °FF' ► eapvtAgaci ne_) PROPOSED LAND USE -s4•N€ ago rr- COMPANY(if applicable): (S): deer war EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ott -MAAPESIGNATION: ADDRESS: J053- 50. CITY: q� „` ZIP: �,Q�5 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION `--r�"� u (if applicable): ZIAOr TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: ?LC C6'1 j RI IL) CA CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): p l/A. NAME: ell__L n (S SITE AREA (in square feet): (� C. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED COMPANY(if applicable): Crry oc Rem-ziN f e-DiA FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING I THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): r � � —ADDRESS:I 5-5- S' U �T/JSr 144 42 A , PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE(if applicable): IN f - CITY: Vt.r3 ZIP: , /< NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable): wA. TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 1 f Z-- 2(3 —(r j? NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable)] /E 9 cexl)se- '2 c rem +Yl.IAA,O Q:\WEB\PVV\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformmasterapp.doc06/25/02 . 1 F,.;_ )JECT INFORMATION (coni Jed) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): I4(6 ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): oLibe ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): N(4. ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): j(6' 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. applicable): N'�� ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE ❑: WETLANDS sq.ft. NEW PROJECT(if applicable): wA' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION , TOWNSHIP_, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. ,4 t = I 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) , declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the C&V -e 1 I ;/,� uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. / CGL% figrrattrre-of-eiw OM_ Gc+Ncr- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformmasterapp.doc06/25/02 i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax:425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc06/25/02 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 1-92L-� rRE. s114INIMVC 8/G-&l/ Cc 0 Jb & Foy P LtrS''�Ior�S� 2. Name of applicant: Cr<Pt oF10 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Gtc( or 1 N 1 Eb$1S P Roo-row G r M Gam-cent r-c.e a. iin+ /2- N W 1 S IJ, t�tL C cB 4. Date checklist prepared: Oesr-o G.EEg., ' % 5. Agency requesting checklist: C i, o F iEl.)-r-oki 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): N(I No0--? T-4_-r ► grloi) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. wit.4 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. fkc_r(ei 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. C i TY Cw 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. T 1 S PP-6 looms Al 004,2— ) 1211-tS . 14-6/61 0F. O N£ 1-4-6_ ai-e gr"1.9MJiPGL 8-16-N Pew'-trTa Inr 9--Me L/ 4(-rov e5.�, ii. rRo1-t (eel-F // ITb ;N.-C-0W ri1.4 1g S76-A4 TO 6g VLS f GL C cm '77f lC Asov-c`t ,L Ll AO .. ,3'CgD Z_I f<f G iLiTY Or c W-tS Kew SicN P-ifc. 4--t'E..S e. '' goX P.,rss etv O SE /N PUiLV/N 150)0a0 seQ.ccr. /u s/ac 1i i t& ''z..0; -t 'r" k ' A" Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. F}f P&/6kl•6L� 60 ii_vis Cf &w 3v 43,70 SSR , ' i Ai <si ZE CooP Sri JC- a G- 60,1( Re-4 1-d- £JE. r 7J cr EMPLo`t'E-fCkYr gip- V L-YL B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . ►K!O- b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) tom_ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. .74,4 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 14 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N f A_ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g.' About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? A/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doe 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. UJ\f11. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. wItt c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. rA- 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. N (A- 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NM- Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N,fA� 2) Describe waste material.that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. N'(A c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) ; Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. NI% 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: W riN 4. PLANTS a., Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: J( deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? -)4 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nf h- d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 14/4 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: NIA- Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. )y k}- c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain QED/A' d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: p/& 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Nal b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. iv(h. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: hV/P- 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Nirp• 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. tJ!„A- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: rJ/A Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? :p fr . 2) , What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. t4 3) ; Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: - 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. , What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? U/k • , b. ; Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. W c. Describe any structures on the site. IJ d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? WA- What is the current zoning classification of the site? 94fA f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? k1,'A g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? IJ fA- h: Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, .1 specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? /A Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ;J(/ k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Q,i F I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: f g 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 14 f IN b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 0.4 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: W o 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 476-14 3t6-kicr o IIS xr.- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Y S ot= m € V Lc-E Y -4 FRS 0 S uageu N bl A16- Hi -L c Can)LD t C P0(0-Wr 01-1-` tW 191--Gu:c)IA)6- 1A-4 - S/c JS, Jet Maly'pjJ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: it C�2oPas APPcr L �� emu( 3vx Q tc. u1 dxa /To eur'c.Dif`1r'a"-- sau R20%s cfl i ''DO oob9 ( `!z. OuJzY �vA'�t Ai" d'!�a(ki- S1 �, Cv2( nt�L`� 2 E /Ov �klc GA-V , 14NI, cbU ' DIE Ur VP)rr rs 11. LIGHT AND GLARE e6 QUP P6ftL U.Ss rTt}tS c`a,'+�If„ f a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? u,�� b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 8 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nfr 14. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: rVa+ 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? um_ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. d,Jr 6 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: M/f 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: J,'fr 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. is b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? f� c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? w f Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? car E} e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. p.j !kr f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. or& g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: iVik 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. IV'd A- 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Ij". b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NrA- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent eg, C: ,q- ( ir�61, Name Printed: /L.. CL t i= 6,cry o ri NUJ Date: I �217%72- Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 10 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS ( Ksf`eefeil- td.,;:only-;b010.setl "for 40.6st:=0,4 t n`;„decis a44:0`z" .o064 ":1744 sand =.",,""er,on..':�"`":ca...rs.. �x ,:�.K.� x a� 2.4v r«-� � .,:n.�s�,r•&n.S y,r '�s.Ry. i a P ;$�,)itti`e s :You:"dn of=i�eaild,ifill.orr ,th"ese sheets foie.`ro e,�t;acflo s` ':W._::- :,,.._•',-a x r,f, Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if th'e proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? r1JA. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NI 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? 44 • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: wiN 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Wpc Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;:such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? tN Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: y,},/16)- 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? .1,/(A- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 11 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? (14{ Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. �pC4 H Fu CA- .w2 TAIS wo;‘) Pv SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.Proponent: �i �I �PJ (/� 2) - 01,61-W\__ Name Printed: ( / ri ce Ct ay. 1 rL Date: /2�f�Z ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 12 PROPOSAL SUMMARY Existing RMC 4-4-100E.5.e.ii. allows a large freestanding sign of 60 feet in height for properties with over 450,000 square feet in developable property potentially dedicated to retail sales. The proposed code amendment allows the height of this large freestanding sign to increase from 60 feet to !115 feet. The increased height allowance will permit this type of sign to rise above the mature full-growth tree line. In addition,the proposal limits the applicability of this section of code to big box retail uses in buildings over 350,000 square feet in size that are located in the Employment Area Valley. Existing code language is vaguely worded and open to wide interpretation. The code amendment will permit higher signs only for larger, big-box retail uses located within large buildings. 4-2-080B • * 0 • B. EMPLOYMENT AREA VALLEY: •ti ; .i: •,' ,i ,., .• -,„ if.74...\: _\:r---Litij if M i , , Vt. „v -7 '. Lit, - ----,--,„ \ N,. . ,,' - -- -E.,,,,,, r i.It li �... ..._.�.,... J'"d�' 4'•-` _ - .—_�4—I-"::4 -7-/— 'v , � f • z , G se.In 51 t3LC 3�f�L ._ i , 1 li p .Vt;Oth�t 7 4....:;.^ (^. \ Cr'.?. \ 5 R n1y:i Yf'pr Pti , ,,,, ! , ." I ..';*.- .,:i,.t;i1IEVE3 . ;; I I _...__ 4 t, ll �5 '41, • - - L. vn ... : _ — ,i � y `�`� S �. 'i I % lam `; 1'. 1 r ft( SA y:. 13" n pi � . '� � \ ;� L "n i c I ....� ....__., w �. Ii( ! \. � 44:Sc 5`. � dip ya+� jj \ 1' ; tJ r! 1 _.... i I I_ .. t 14i fb j h S• ._ -- toa r:2__.: 1 .,s — --- if— i C ; " I :,, Sa�lt:n St �ii° p• "N_ , �/a �...... : 1 )) ! _- - (± . �1:r1• . .4[ -7 1 77' i/1 rt a (Ord. 4722, 5-11-1998; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002) • 2-63 (Revised 8/02) 4-4-100 SIGN REGULATIONS E. SIZE,NUMBER AND HEIGHT OF PERMANENT SIGNS: 5. Additional Signs Permitted in Commercial and Industrial Zones: Except in the City Sign Regulation Area,the following shall apply in all commercial and industrial zones: e. Large Retail Uses: Property dedicated primarily to retail sales may install oversized signs as follows in lieu of signage permitted under subsections E5a(i),Business Signs, and E5d, Shopping Centers, of this Section. (Ord. 4577, 1-22-1996) ii. Big Box Retail Uses with over 350,000 square feet of total building area , Feet: Big box retail uses with over 350.000 square feet in total building area Pfelaefties-witli-ever—feur—hundfed-fik-theu-sand-45-0AGYsquar-e-feet-in developable p tentially dedicate ail ales may install: • Large Freestanding Signs: One on-premises freestanding sign not to exceed one hundred-fifteen sixty-feet(60115') in height and seven hundred-(700)square feet per face,and another such sign not to exceed forty feet(40')in height and four hundred(400) square feet per face, and; • Roof Signs: One roof-mounted sign per building of up to four hundred(400) square feet not to exceed twenty feet(20') in height above the parapet wall and not to exceed two(2) such signs per retail center, and; • Additional Freestanding Signs: Two (2) on-premises freestanding signs per street frontage,no more than eight feet(8')tall and no more than one hundred(100) square feet per side. (Ord. 4577, 1-22- 1996) 1