Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 12/14/2009
`It AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING December 14, 2009 Monday, 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION: Meeghan Black Week - December 13 to 19, 2009 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: a. Neighborhood Program Year in Review b. National Weather Service (NWS) Storm Readiness Rating 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT, (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 12/7/2009. Council concur. b. Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Municipal Arts Commission for three- year terms expiring 12/31/2012: Britt McKenzie (Peterson), Evelyn Reingold, and Wesley Van Doren. Council concur. c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 12/8/2009 for CAG-09-171, 2009 Earlington Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements; 16 bids; engineer's estimate $3,356,305.74; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Laser Underground & Earthworks Inc., in the amount of $2,162,511.12. Council concur. d. Executive Department recommends hiring a part-time Office Assistant I to assist with mail handling services. Council concur. e. Executive Department recommends approval of a contract with Pitney Bowes in the amount of $29,409 to purchase a D1950 Mail Inserting System to replace the current equipment in the print shop. Council concur. f. Community Services Department reports bid opening on 11/10/2009 for the City Hall Fifth & Sixth Floor Remodel Project; five bids; engineer's estimate $145,000; and submits recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Landon Construction Group, in the amount of $132,537. Council concur. g. Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of Amendment #1 to CAG-09- 081, to accept $1,160,946 from King County for basic life support services for 2010. The City's share will be $860,223, King County Fire District #25 $101,719, and King County Fire District #40 $199,004. Council concur. h. Police Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $206,121 with Occupational Health Services (Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County) for health services for Renton jail inmates for 2010. Council concur. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) L Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-09-092, 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps, and requests approval of the project, final pay estimate in the amount of $27,934.39, and commencement of a 60-day lien period, with Western Asphalt, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. j. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum #1 to CAG-09-134, with Marshall and Associates, in the amount of $119,518 to assist with additional scoped data collection and extend the contract through 12/31/2010. Council concur. k. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $115,775 with Gray and Osborne, Inc. for the design, permitting, and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement project. Council concur. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topic may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: Court Probation Services b. Community Services Committee: Brahm & Goranson Appointments to Airport Advisory Committee c. Finance Committee: 2010 Healthcare Management Administrators Contract; King County Park & Ride Garage Agreement Lease Amendment; Alternative Public Works Contracting Processes* d. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Portable Tow -Away Signs Placed by Contractors; Airport Lease with Bosair, LLC e. Utilities Committee: 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual Adoption 9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Calling for the annexation by election of the Fairwood area (via 12/7/2009 Committee of the Whole report) b. Alternative public works contracting processes (See 8.c.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. 2009 final budget amendment (1st reading 12/7/2009) b. School district impact fees (1st reading 12/7/2009) c. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-07, Alleys in the RC, R1, & R-4 zones (1st reading 12/7/2009) d. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-16, Comprehensive Plan & Title IV Amendment Process (1st reading 12/7/2009) e. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-20, Complete Streets (1st reading 12/7/2009) f. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-23B & #D-23C, Cottage Housing/Small Lot Designs & Residential Design Standards (1st reading 12/7/2009) g. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-25B, Land Use Permit Procedures (1st reading 12/7/2009) h. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-28 & #D-30, Housing Definitions & Definition of a Lot (1st reading 12/7/2009) i. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-34, County Vesting (1st reading 12/7/2009) j. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #D-10, Helipads (1st reading 12/7/2009) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. ADJOURNMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA I (Preceding Council Meeting) COUNCIL CHAMBERS December 14, 2009 Monday, 5:30 p.m. Court Probation Services Briefing; City Center Community Plan • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11 AM & 9 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9 AM & 7 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1 PM & 9 PM CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Executive Department Staff Contact...... Denis Law, Mayor Subject: Reappointments to Municipal Arts Commission Britt McKenzie Evelyn Reingold Wesley Van Doren Exhibits: N/A Recommended Action: Council Concur Ala: For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept..... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Law reappoints the following to the Municipal Arts Commission: Ms. Britt McKenzie (formerly Britt Peterson), 16467 111th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055, for a term that expires on 12/31/12. Ms. Evelyn Reingold, 833 SW Sunset Blvd, L-56, Renton, WA 98057, for a term that expires on 12/31/12. Mr. Wesley Van Doren, 225 Logan Avenue S, Suite A203, Renton, WA 98057, for a term that expires on 12/31/12. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: X Concur in Mayor Law's reappointments of Britt McKenzie, Evelyn Reingold, and Wesley Van Doren to the Municipal Arts Commission. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... Executive/City Clerk Bonnie Walton Subject: Bid opening on December 8, 2009, for CAG-09-171, 2009 Earlington Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements Exhibits: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (16 bids) Recommended Action: Council concur AI #: " 6, For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information ......... Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $2,162,511.12 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.......... Total Project Budget $2,700,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $3,356,305.74 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities with the low bid. Therefore staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. in the amount of $2,162,511.12. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Laser Underground & Earthworks, Inc. in the amount of $2,162,511.12. E1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT City of M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 9, 2009 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7210)m Andrew Weygandt, Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7208) SUBJECT: Bid Opening for 2009 Earlington Water and Sewer Improvements Project (CAG-09-171) On December 9, 2009, at 2:30 p.m., the City received sixteen bids for the 2009 Earlington Water and Sewer Improvements. The City Clerk opened and publicly read all bids at 2:45 p.m. Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc. of Snohomish, WA submitted the low bid, in the total amount $2,162,511.12. We have checked all bids for completeness, mathematical correctness, and inclusion of all required forms, and found no irregularities or mathematical errors in the low bid submitted by Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc. The engineer's estimate for this project is $3,656,305.74. In accordance with Council procedure, the low bid meets all three conditions for award: 1. The low bid must be within the total project budget. 2. There must be more than one bidder. 3. The lowest responsive, responsible bid contains no significant irregularities. The Water Utility recommends that Council award the contract to Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc., in the total amount of $2,162,511.12, at its meeting of December 14, 2009. The total project budget is $2,700,000. The Water Utility share is $1,200,000 from the Water Utility Capital Improvement budget and the Wastewater Utility share is $1,500,000 from the Wastewater Utility Capital Improvement budget. If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you for your assistance. Attachments: Bid tabulation cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director David Christensen, Wastewater Utility Supervisor h:\file sys\wtr - drinking water utility\wtr-27 - water project files\wtr-27-3082- 2009 earlington water and sewer improve ments\construction\wtr-27-3082_memo-to-city-clerk-contract-award.doc\AWtp SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Description Amount Construction Contract including 9.5% sales tax (from low bid submitted by Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc. on 12/8/09) $2,162,511.12 Construction Engineering & Administration (estimated) $150,000 Special Inspection & Testing (estimated) $10,000 Contingencies (estimated) $367,488.88 Total Contract Cost (estimated) $2,700,000 Total Project Budget $2,700,000 h:\file sys\wtr - drinking water utility\wtr-27 - water project files\wtr-27-3082- 2009 earlington water and sewer improve ments\construction\wtr-27-3082_memo-to-city-clerk-contract-awa rd.doc\AWtp Project Title: 2009 Earlington Water & Sewer Improvements Laser Underground BID DATE: December 08, 2009 Item Unit Est. Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation & Clean-up Lump Sum 1 194,000.00 194,000.00 2 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 3 Trench Excavation Safety Systems Lump Sum 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 4 Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 5 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 6 Re -Establish Existing Monuments Each 10 500.00 5,000.00 7 Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 6,416 65.00 417,040.00 8 Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 3,850 45.00 173,250.00 9 Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Each 25 4,000.00 100,000.00 10 Furnish and Install 54" Dia. Sanitary Sewer Saddle Manhole Each 5 4,500.00 22,500.00 11 Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Existing Manhole Each 4 3,000.00 12,000.00 12 Abandon Existing Manhole Each 2 500.00 1,000.00 13 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material Ton 500 1.00 500.00 14 Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers Lineal Foot 6,416 1.00 6,416.00 15 Furnish and Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe & Fittings w/Polywra Lineal Foot 7,300 35.00 255,500.00 16 Furnish and Install 8" Gate Valve Assembly Each 44 800.00 35,200.00 17 Furnish and Install 12"x8" Wet -Tap Tee&Gate Valve Assembly Each 2 3,500.00 7,000.00 18 Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly Each 15 3,500.00 52,500.00 19 Connection to Existing Water Main Each 10 2,000.00 20,000.00 20 Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks Cubic Yard 33 250.00 8,250.00 21 Furnish & Install 3/4" Water Service Connection Each 130 1,200.00 156,000.00 22 Select Imported Trench Backfill Ton 24,000 0.01 240.00 23 Crushed Rocks for Shoulder Restoration Ton 200 40.00 8,000.00 24 H.M.A. Class'/i' PG 64-22 for Roadway Reconstruction includi Square -Yard 22,000 18.00 396,000.00 25 Temporary Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) for Trench Patching Square -Yard 10,000 1.00 10,000.00 26 Removal and Replacement of Concrete Curb and Gutter Lineal Foot 100 20.00 2,000.00 27 Replace Traffic Loop Sensor,Pavement Markings &Traffic Butt, Lump Sum 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 28 Concrete Driveway and/or Sidewalk Restoration Square -Yard 400 35.00 14,000.00 29 Property & Landscape Restoration Lump Sum 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 Subtotal $1,974,896.00 Tax $187,615.12 Total $2,162,511.12 R.L. Alia Pivetta Brothers Shoreline Construction Universal Land Construction Buno Construction Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 125,000.00 125,000.00 182,300.00 182,300.00 180,000.00 180,000.00 135,000.00 135,000.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 41,000.00 41,000.00 38,000.00 38,000.00 28,000.00 28,000.00 67,000.00 67,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,600.00 4,600.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 21,000.00 21,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 28,156.00 28,156.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 300.00 3,000.00 325.00 3,250.00 600.00 6,000.00 225.00 2,250.00 800.00 8,000.00 49.00 314,384.00 36.00 230,976.00 55.00 352,880.00 90.00 577,440.00 73.00 468,368.00 47.00 180,950.00 35.00 134,750.00 45.00 173,250.00 30.00 115,500.00 50.00 192,500.00 2,500.00 62,500.00 3,500.00 87,500.00 6,500.00 162,500.00 3,200.00 80,000.00 3,200.00 80,000.00 4,500.00 22,500.00 4,000.00 20,000.00 6,500.00 32,500.00 2,900.00 14,500.00 3,300.00 16,500.00 500.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 20,000.00 1,300.00 5,200.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 5,000.00 20,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,600.00 3,200.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 15.00 7,500.00 20.00 10,000.00 0.01 5.00 25.00 12,500.00 1.00 500.00 1.00 6,416.00 1.80 11,548.80 2.00 12,832.00 2.00 12,832.00 1.00 6,416.00 44.00 321,200.00 36.00 262,800.00 32.00 233,600.00 22.00 160,600.00 32.00 233,600.00 800.00 35,200.00 1,360.00 59,840.00 850.00 37,400.00 850.00 37,400.00 900.00 39,600.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 5,200.00 10,400.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 4,500.00 67,500.00 4,100.00 61,500.00 3,400.00 51,000.00 3,200.00 48,000.00 3,500.00 52,500.00 1,800.00 18,000.00 1,700.00 17,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 150.00 4,950.00 105.00 3,465.00 150.00 4,950.00 275.00 9,075.00 100.00 3,300.00 600.00 78,000.00 825.00 107,250.00 1,200.00 156,000.00 775.00 100,750.00 1,000.00 130,000.00 0.50 12,000.00 0.50 12,000.00 0.01 240.00 0.01 240.00 9.00 216,000.00 35.00 7,000.00 22.00 4,400.00 40.00 8,000.00 21.00 4,200.00 18.00 3,600.00 20.50 451,000.00 23.70 521,400.00 22.00 484,000.00 23.00 506,000.00 15.00 330,000.00 16.50 165,000.00 7.25 72,500.00 0.01 100.00 4.00 40,000.00 0.01 100.00 30.00 3,000.00 30.00 3,000.00 20.00 2,000.00 21.00 2,100.00 20.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 5,900.00 5,900.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 50.00 20,000.00 35.00 14,000.00 32.00 12,800.00 33.00 13,200.00 40.00 16,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 54,000.00 54,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 Subtotal $1,994,100.00 Tax $189,439.50 Subtotal $1,998,035.80 Tax $189,813.40 Subtotal $2,006,757.00 Tax $190,641.92 Total $2,183,539.50 Total $2,187,849.20 Total $2,197,398.92 Subtotal $2,010,487.00 Tax $190,996.27 Total $2,201,483.27 Subtotal $2,026,984.00 Tax $192,563.48 Total $2,219,547.48 Rodarte Construction Kar-Vel Construction Plats Plus Archer Construction Johansen Excavating Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 200,000.00 200,000.00 210,000.00 210,000.00 155,000.00 155,000.00 218,000.00 218,000.00 86,400.00 86,400.00 100, 000.00 100, 000.00 15, 000.00 15, 000.00 19, 000.00 19, 000.00 130, 000.00 130, 000.00 153, 900.00 153,900.00 100.00 100.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100.00 100.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 21,250.00 21,250.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,350.00 12,350.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 10,875.00 10,875.00 250.00 2,500.00 1,200.00 12,000.00 300.00 3,000.00 250.00 2,500.00 320.00 3,200.00 40.00 256,640.00 59.00 378,544.00 36.00 230,976.00 70.00 449,120.00 37.35 239,637.60 28.00 107,800.00 54.00 207,900.00 35.00 134,750.00 50.00 192,500.00 40.65 156,502.50 2,500.00 62,500.00 4,000.00 100,000.00 3,400.00 85,000.00 2,400.00 60,000.00 3,300.00 82,500.00 2,900.00 14,500.00 5,000.00 25,000.00 4,200.00 21,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 25,000.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 10,000.00 2,100.00 8,400.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 1,370.00 5,480.00 200.00 400.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 450.00 900.00 500.00 1,000.00 335.00 670.00 14.00 7,000.00 8.00 4,000.00 12.00 6,000.00 1.00 500.00 24.00 12,000.00 4.00 25,664.00 2.00 12,832.00 0.75 4,812.00 3.00 19,248.00 1.00 6,416.00 38.00 277,400.00 38.00 277,400.00 37.00 270,100.00 40.00 292,000.00 29.00 211,700.00 1,000.00 44,000.00 950.00 41,800.00 850.00 37,400.00 900.00 39,600.00 985.00 43,340.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 5,200.00 10,400.00 3,100.00 6,200.00 3,800.00 7,600.00 3,450.00 6,900.00 3,500.00 52,500.00 4,600.00 69,000.00 3,200.00 48,000.00 3,600.00 54,000.00 3,600.00 54,000.00 1,250.00 12,500.00 3,000.00 30,000.00 1,200.00 12,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 1,200.00 12,000.00 200.00 6,600.00 75.00 2,475.00 180.00 5,940.00 110.00 3,630.00 155.00 5,115.00 750.00 97,500.00 1,000.00 130,000.00 690.00 89,700.00 850.00 110,500.00 725.00 94,250.00 8.00 192,000.00 1.00 24,000.00 13.00 312,000.00 1.00 24,000.00 13.35 320,400.00 20.00 4,000.00 16.00 3,200.00 22.00 4,400.00 25.00 5,000.00 17.00 3,400.00 18.00 396,000.00 21.00 462,000.00 22.00 484,000.00 21.00 462,000.00 21.95 482,900.00 10.00 100, 000.00 1.00 10, 000.00 15.00 150, 000.00 1.00 10, 000.00 10.85 108,500.00 30.00 3,000.00 35.00 3,500.00 28.00 2,800.00 30.00 3,000.00 31.00 3,100.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 5,600.00 5,600.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 45.00 18,000.00 48.00 19,200.00 45.00 18,000.00 55.00 22,000.00 14,350.00 5,740,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 43,500.00 43,500.00 Subtotal $2,033,604.00 Tax $193,192.38 Total $2,226,796.38 Subtotal $2,133,251.00 Tax $202,658.85 Total $2,335,909.85 Subtotal $2,163,578.00 Tax $205,539.91 Total $2,369,117.91 Subtotal $2,187,198.00 Tax $207,783.81 Total $2,394,981.81 Subtotal $7,951,286.10 Tax $755,372.18 Total $8,706,658.28 Hoffman Construction Construct Company DPK Construction Olson Brothers Marshbank Construction Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 150,000.00 150,000.00 160,000.00 160,000.00 193,000.00 193,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 86,300.00 86,300.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 57,000.00 57,000.00 86,000.00 86,000.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 135,000.00 135,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 26,100.00 26,100.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 18,800.00 18, 800.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 27,100.00 27,100.00 500.00 5,000.00 4.50 45.00 600.00 6,000.00 250.00 2,500.00 329.00 3,290.00 62.00 397,792.00 95.00 609,520.00 72.00 461,952.00 60.00 384,960.00 56.00 359,296.00 67.50 259,875.00 60.00 231,000.00 60.00 231,000.00 50.00 192,500.00 28.00 107,800.00 3,175.00 79,375.00 2,800.00 70,000.00 1,800.00 45,000.00 1,810.00 45,250.00 2,530.00 63,250.00 3,450.00 17,250.00 3,300.00 16,500.00 3,400.00 17,000.00 2,300.00 11,500.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 2,300.00 9,200.00 600.00 2,400.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 1,050.00 4,200.00 938.00 3,752.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00 650.00 1,300.00 500.00 1,000.00 436.00 872.00 0.01 5.00 1.00 500.00 10.00 5,000.00 25.00 12,500.00 24.00 12,000.00 1.00 6,416.00 1.50 9,624.00 1.00 6,416.00 1.00 6,416.00 1.35 8,661.60 33.00 240,900.00 45.00 328,500.00 45.00 328,500.00 47.00 343,100.00 40.00 292,000.00 925.00 40,700.00 930.00 40,920.00 1,000.00 44,000.00 1,000.00 44,000.00 868.00 38,192.00 2,800.00 5,600.00 2,800.00 5,600.00 4,100.00 8,200.00 2,800.00 5,600.00 2,890.00 5,780.00 3,560.00 53,400.00 3,900.00 58,500.00 3,200.00 48,000.00 3,400.00 51,000.00 3,333.00 49,995.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 2,300.00 23,000.00 3,200.00 32,000.00 1,400.00 14,000.00 1,524.00 15,240.00 105.00 3,465.00 180.00 5,940.00 275.00 9,075.00 120.00 3,960.00 168.00 5,544.00 975.00 126,750.00 935.00 121,550.00 950.00 123,500.00 610.00 79,300.00 773.00 100,490.00 12.15 291,600.00 0.01 240.00 0.01 240.00 15.00 360,000.00 11.00 264,000.00 22.50 4,500.00 35.00 7,000.00 30.00 6,000.00 26.00 5,200.00 17.00 3,400.00 19.50 429,000.00 20.00 440,000.00 25.00 550,000.00 23.00 506,000.00 29.00 638,000.00 0.01 100.00 1.00 10,000.00 0.01 100.00 15.00 150,000.00 21.00 210,000.00 26.00 2,600.00 27.00 2,700.00 25.00 2,500.00 31.00 3,100.00 46.00 4,600.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 5,100.00 5,100.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 7,800.00 7,800.00 36.50 14,600.00 43.00 17,200.00 33.00 13,200.00 68.00 27,200.00 42.00 16,800.00 33,600.00 33,600.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 72,000.00 72,000.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 29,300.00 29,300.00 Subtotal $2,260,628.00 Tax $214,759.66 Subtotal $2,261,839.00 Tax $214,874.71 Subtotal $2,340,483.00, Tax $222,345.89 Total $2,475,387.66 Total $2,476,713.71 Total $2,562,828.89 Subtotal $2,416,886.00 Tax $229,604.17 Total $2,646,490.17 Subtotal $2,548,362.60 Tax $242,094.45 Total $2,790,457.05 CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET ROJECT: 2009 Earlington Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements Page 1 of 2 CAG-09-171 DATE: December 8, 2009 FORMS BID Proposal BIDDER & Triple Bid Sched. Of L&I Sub Form Bond Prices Cert. List **Includes Sales Tax Archer Construction 7855 S. 206th St Kent, WA 98032 x x x x x $2,394,981.81 Allyson Gregerson Buno Construction 20219 99th Ave. SE Snohomish, WA 908296 x x x x x $2,219,547.48 Dan Buno Construct Company 1621 Pease Ave Sumner, WA 98390 x x x x x $2,481,591.93 Cy Morse DPK Inc. '829 S. 206th St. Kent, WA 98032 x x x x x $2,562,828.89 David Kiyohara Hoffman Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 845 Enumclaw, WA 98022 x x x x x $2,475,387.66 Brad Hoffman Johansen Excavating, Inc. Missing 28215 112th St. E. pg. 1 of 2 Buckley, WA 98321 x x x x x $2,437,071.53 Jacob Cimmer Kar-Vel Construction P.O. Box 58275 Renton, WA 98058 x x x x x $2,335,909.84 Mike Waldner Laser Underground & Earthworks 20417 87th Ave. SE Snohomish, WA 98296 x x x x x $2,162,511.12 Bret Lane Marshbank Construction P.O. Box 97 Lake Stevens, WA 98258 x x x x x $2,790,457.05 Dave Marshbank CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: 2009 Earlington Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements Page 2 of 2 CAG-09-171 DATE: December 8, 2009 FORMS BID Proposal BIDDER & Triple Bid Sched. Of L&I Sub Form Bond Prices Cert. List "Includes Sales Tax Olson Bros. Excavting, Inc. 6622 112th St. E. Puyallup, WA 98373 x x x x x $2,646,490.17 Steve Olson Pivetta Brothers Construction P.O. Box 370 Sumner, WA 98390 x x x x x $2,187,849.20 Mark Pivetta Plats Plus, Inc. 720 Cedar Ave., Ste. C. Mayrsville, WA 98270 x x x x x $2,369,117.91 Brendan Reeves R.L. Alia Company 107 Williams Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 x x x x x $2,183,539.50 Richard Alia Rodarte Construction P.O. Box 1875 Auburn, WA 98071 x x x x x $2,226,796.38 JR Rodarte Shoreline Construction P.O. Box 358 Woodinville, WA 98072 x x x x x $2,197,398.92 Douglas Suzuki Universal/Land Construction P.O. Box 329 20306 144th Ave. NE Woodinville, WA 98072 x x x x x $2,201,483.27 James Bold ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE LEGEND: Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage $3,356,305.74 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... Executive/Communications Preeti Shridhar Subject: Hiring part-time Office Assistant 1 for mail services Exhibits: Issue Paper AM For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept ...... x Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required Amount Budgeted...... Total Project Bu $37,631 Use savings from video - streaming contract and other contract reductions Transfer/Amendment. Revenue Generated......... Share Total Pro X SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mail services for the City are currently provided by a temporary employee, working 30 hours a week. The job function includes mail sorting, daily mail delivery and pick-up to City departments, and bulk mail delivery to the post office. This delivery function is a core, time -sensitive service. The Administration has concluded that hiring a part-time office assistant to provide this dedicated function is the most cost-effective and reliable option. The City is currently exploring an alternate system to the Granicus video -streaming system, which currently costs $16,800 a year. In addition, the City is evaluating other service contract reductions and will utilize these savings to help pay for the cost of the part-time Office Assistant 1. In 2010, savings of approximately $15,000 have been realized from negotiating a reduced price for a mail sorting machine, and these will be utilized until further service contract reductions are made. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the hiring of a part-time Office Assistant 1 as part of the Communications Division/Print Shop to provide mail services. Renton net/agnbilI/ bh 00ci'y of EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT 0001111100000000p COMMUNICATION DIVISION M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 2009 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor —�or FROM: Preeti Shridhar, Communications Director STAFF CONTACT: Preeti Shridhar, Communications Director (extension 6569) SUBJECT: Part-time Office Assistant 1 for Mail Services in the City's Print Shop ISSUE: Should Council approve hiring a part-time Office Assistant 1 for mail delivery services for the City's Print Shop? RECOMMENDATION: • Hire a part-time Office Assistant 1 as part of the Communications Division/Print Shop to provide mail services (Grade A01, half-time salary plus benefits = $37,631) • Implement less expensive options to the current video -streaming contract (current contract = $16,800 per year) and utilize savings to pay for this position • Evaluate other reductions to service contracts and utilize the resulting savings. • In 2010 utilize approximately $15,000 of savings achieved from the reduced price of the Mail Inserting System. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Mail services for the City are currently provided by a temporary employee, working 30 hours a week. The job functions include sorting the mail that is delivered to City Hall, daily delivery and pick-up to departments in City Hall, City Attorney's Office (Second Street offices), Community Services (Liberty Park), Human Services (Old Mill Building) and once daily to Fire Stations (five stations including training facility at station #14) and the building inspectors. Additionally, bulk mail is delivered to the post office for utility billing and other services. This delivery function is a core, time -sensitive service. There are several other reasons to support the hiring of a part-time Office Assistant including: c:\documents and settings\iseth\local settings\temporary internet files\content.outlook\spsdk6fz\20091214_issue paper —office assistant 1.doc Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 December 14, 2009 1. This is a core service that is critical for every department to function. 2. Hiring a part-time Office Assistant 1 is the most cost-effective and reliable option to provide this service. Using an outside mail delivery services is more expensive, and it is more inefficient if each department is responsible for their own mail pick-up and delivery. Plus, certain critical time -sensitive documents that need to be transported to and from the different City facilities requiring dedicated staff to ensure that delivery. 3. This position would also perform the bulk mail delivery function for utility bill mailing and other bulk mail for the City. 4. While the original budget for intermittent salary and benefits of $29,547 were cut due to budget shortfall, savings of approximately $15,000 have been realized from negotiating a reduced price for a mail sorting machine. Also, the City is currently exploring an alternate system to the Granicus video -streaming system, which currently costs $16,800 a year. While the exact cost savings are not yet available, the Administration is confident of implementing a similar service at a significantly reduced amount. Together, these savings can be dedicated to help pay for the cost of the half-time Office Assistant 1 in 2010. The new position will support the needs of all City departments but will be part of the Communications Division/Print Shop and will report to the Print & Mail Coordinator. FISCAL IMPACT In the calendar year, 2010, there will be minimal fiscal impact to the general fund since savings from the purchase of a mail inserting machine and reductions from the video - streaming contract will be used. CONCLUSION: The part-time Office Assistant 1 position will ensure that mail services are provided in a cost-effective and reliable manner. The Administration recommends extending the current intermittent service until such time that a permanent position is filled to ensure adequate training, continuity of service, and minimum disruption. The Administration also plans to institute other operational changes to this function to maximize efficiency and keep the costs low. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... Subject: Executive Communications Division Preeti Shridhar, Comm. Director Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System Purchase Exhibits: Issue Paper Pitney Bowes D1950 Specifications and Price Quote I Al #: For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing... Correspondence... Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept ...... x Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $29,409 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount'Budgeted....... $45,000 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $29,409 City Share Total Project... $29,409 ►Zq SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Communications Division Print Shop would like to purchase a Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System to replace the aging existing mail inserting equipment. The cost of the Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System is $29,409 including tax. The Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System will provide the City with the necessary equipment to continue to provide mail inserting services for all the City's needs. The City currently processes approximately 400,000 pieces of mail per year. The current equipment is used almost daily for City business such as utility billing, late notices, business licenses, accounts payable, jury summons, payroll, newsletter inserts and much more. The current machine's lease has expired, time required for repairs has increased, and parts are hard to obtain. This necessitates the purchase of a new machine. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of the Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System for use in the Communications Division Print/Mail Shop. H:\EXEC\Communications\Print_Mail\ 20091214_Agenda_Bill_Pitney_Bowes.doc EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT 00000�1 City of COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 2009 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: �G Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Preeti Shridhar, Communications Director STAFF CONTACT: Preeti Shridhar, Communications Director (extension 6569) SUBJECT: Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System Purchase ISSUE: Should Council approve the purchase of a Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System to replace the aging equipment the City currently has? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of the Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System for use by the Communications Division Print Shop. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Communication Division Print Shop would like to purchase a Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System to replace the aging equipment the print shop currently uses. The City processes approximately 400,000 pieces of mail per year. The current equipment is used almost daily for City business such as utility billing, late notices, business licenses, accounts payable, jury summons, payroll, newsletter inserts and much more. The current machine was purchased in 2001 for $25,337 with an anticipated life expectancy of approximately 5 years. The system has outlived that expectation by nearly 4 years but not without some difficulties. Down time for repairs is becoming more frequent, and the City's maintenance provider has expressed concern that replacement parts for the current system have become increasingly difficult to locate. Due to the fact that this system is several years past its life expectancy, the risk of equipment failure has increased significantly. In addition, the City's current maintenance contract ($2,800/year) for the equipment has recently expired, and according to the service provider it is unlikely they can continue to provide maintenance for the equipment beyond one more year. Randy Corman, Council President . e Members of Renton City .Council Page 2 of 2 December 14, 2009 Capital funds were budgeted in 2007 for the purchase of this equipment based upon extensive research into the City's mail service needs. Following extensive research of . vendors and alternate systems for the City's mail service needs, in 2007 the Print/Mail Services manager made a recommendation for the purchase of the Pitney Bowes, D1950 . Mail Inserting System based on several key factors. Print/Mail Services researched and narrowed the, field of available mid -volume equipment to three vendors: the ProMailer 60 from Mailcrafters; the, Maximailer from Nexxpost;. and the DI 950 from Pitney Bowes,. Following visits to test the equipment and numerous calls to other cities and businesses, a decision was made to select the Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System. The.Pitney Bowes system was the lowest priced of the three choices, and will more than adequately.cover the City's needs. In addition; the system has the capability of doing more complex mailings in the future. Currently, Pitney Bowes has provided the City of -Renton with first refusal on a showroom model that will save the City over $15,000 off the regular price of a new machine. A new Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System costs approximately $40,000 to $50,000. However, the.showroom model is available for $29,409, including tax -a significant savings. The system is rated for 7 years or 2.6 million cycles'and will provide dependable service for. all the City's mail service needs. CONCLUSION: The Pitney Bowes D1950 Mail Inserting System will replace the City's aging mail inserting " equipment with an improved, significantly,more sophisticated system; which will, dramatically save the City both time and money by increasing productivity and reducing_ costs for mail services. With the current staff reductions in Print/Mail Services, this equipment is -critical to ensure that the utility billing and'other core mail functions continue with minimum disruption.' cc: [wen Wang, Administrator ney Bowes .ihe fEOW of communication' 1 k�� a i' SAL FOR: OF RENTON t 3 a r x$ { r � f F �1. I, ubmitted by: CH R ENSEN ccount g tiington n 1 353 tEµ Pitney Bowes December 07, 2009 KARL HURST CITY OF RENTON 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 Dear KARL, Pitney Bowes is pleased to provide you with the attached proposal. We are confident that our products and services will deliver maximum efficiency while cutting costs and increasing productivity. We understand that municipal government organizations like yours have unique challenges around your mailstream processes. Managing critical issues such as changing constituent needs, cost containment and maximizing resource output are integral to your operation. Working with Pitney Bowes, you can trust that we understand both the mailstream and the issues you face and therefore know how to integrate the optimal solution. The attached proposal helps to explain how Pitney Bowes mailstream solutions will help run your operation while delivering productivity and efficiency benefits. As you evaluate your options, please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need further information. I am eager for this opportunity to serve you and look forward to finalizing this solution with you soon. Sincerely, Chelsea Jorgensen State Strategic Account Mananger-Washington chelsea.jorgensen@pb.com Office: 1-206-851-3353 Engineering the flow of communication NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY Copyright © 2008, Pitney Bowes Inc. All rights reserved. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND THE SOLUTION PROPOSED BY PITNEY BOWES IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO PITNEY BOWES. THESE MATERIALS CAN BE USED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING A POSSIBLE TRANSACTION BETWEEN PITNEY BOWES AND ITS PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMER. NO RECIPIENT OF THESE MATERIALS MAY USE THEM FOR ITS OWN COMMERCIAL ADVANTAGE. THE RECIPIENT OF THESE MATERIALS MUST HOLD THEM IN CONFIDENCE AND SHALL NOT DISTRIBUTE THEM, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY IN ANY FORM WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF PITNEY BOWES MANAGEMENT. Pitney Bowes Proprietary and Confidential ABOUT PITNEY BOWES Competitive advantages of Pitney Bowes As a $5.6 billion corporation, Pitney Bowes provides the world's most comprehensive suite of mailstream software, hardware, services and solutions to help companies manage their flow of mail, documents and packages to improve communication. With 86 years experience in the mailing industry, Pitney Bowes helps organizations of all sizes engineer the flow of communication to reduce costs, increase effectiveness, and enhance customer relationships. Pitney Bowes created an industry in 1920 with the introduction of the postage meter and continues to lead today in creating products, services and solutions that help business use mail and documents more effectively and efficiently. We have the unique ability to deliver customized solutions that meet the needs of our customers, from the smallest home office to the largest Fortune 50 corporation, owing to: Our best -of -breed document management, digital document delivery, and mailing technology, much of it proprietary, for world -class, automated mail and document operations. Our products and services are in use by approximately 2 million customers worldwide. Our world -class R&D efforts and our Intellectual Property portfolio of more than 3,500 patents worldwide, with applications in a variety of markets, including printing, shipping, encryption, and financial services. We have invested more than 1 billion in research and development over the last decade. Our technology leadership has resulted in, for example, nine out of the top ten credit card issuers in the United States processing their card statements using Pitney Bowes technology. Our dedication to continuous quality process improvement. We have in-depth experience in successfully applying process improvement methodologies. Our Document Messaging Technology (DMT) facility in Danbury, CT was the first in the United States to receive ISO 14001 certification. In addition, we have adopted Six Sigma methodology for certain internal processes at key accounts. Our unsurpassed expertise in postal and carrier processes, built over decades of working with the USPS and other carriers and managing those relationships. Pitney Bowes is best positioned to partner with your company and help you improve the strategic effectiveness of your mail and document flow. Our financial strength. Pitney Bowes is an A+ rated company and generates significant free cash flow to fuel innovation and acquisition, and has a market valuation of over $10 billion. In addition to serving a large number of financial services firms who are our clients, Pitney Bowes is, in part, a financial services firm itself, through our credit services and subsidiary and payment solutions through the Pitney Bowes Bank, Inc. 12/7/2009 Pitney Bowes Proprietary and Confidential Page 1 SOLUTIONS & INVESTMENTS D1950 BASE PACKAGE D1950 FastPac@ Inserting System The D1950 Fastpac® Inserting System is the ultimate high -end tabletop folder inserter. The premium model of our line, the D1950 is designed specifically to meet the high -end demands of mailers with a wide variety of applications Equipment Price SALE $26857 $26,857 + TAX (AT 9.5%, IT WOULD BRING THE TOTAL TO $29,409) SLA $3243 yearly METER $0 monthly SMA $0 yearly D1950 PACKAGE-4 FEEDER TOWER *HIGH CAPACITY ENVELOPE FEEDER *HIGH CAPACITY SHEET FEEDER MODULE *CONVEYOR BELT STACKER *2 SHEET FEEDERS *2 INSERT FEEDERS *90 INCH ADJUSTABLE TABLE *18 INCH TABLE EXTENSION * EXIT TRANSPORT *TOWER FEEDER KIT *ADDRESS INVERTER KIT *DELIVERY, INSTALLATION AND TRAINING. Quote expires - 12/18/2009 12/7/2009 Pitney Bowes Proprietary and Confidential Page 2 N, CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services / Facilities December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Michael Nolan, x6608 Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Subject: 5th & 6th Floor Remodel, Renton City Hall Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Small Works Roster Invitation to Bid (eCityGov.net) Study Sessions...... Form of Proposal (Bid) for the 5th & 6th Floor Remodel Information......... Bid Award Memo Recommended Action: Council concur. Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept..... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $132,537.00 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $150,000.00 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $1,500,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: On November 10, 2009, proposals were received from five contractors for the project "Fifth and Sixth Floor Remodel, Renton City Hall" with the apparent low bidder being Landon Construction Group with a bid of $132,537.00. The proposals (bids) were solicited through the eCityGov.net site using their Small Works Roster which the City of Renton belongs to. This remodel is to accommodate additional planned staff due to the Benson Hill Annexation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the apparent low bid from Landon Construction Group. KI Renton net/agn bill/ bh COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 16, 2009 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Michael Nolan, Facilities Coordinator SUBJECT: Small Works Roster Acceptance of Proposal (Bid), City Hall Fifth & Sixth Floor Remodel We would like to submit the results of the following project proposals (bids) for Council's review and approval. The proposals (bids) were solicited through the eCityGov.net site using their Small Works Roster which the City of Renton belongs to. • For Council Date: November 23, 2009 • Project Name: City Hall Fifth and Sixth Floor Remodel • Project Summary: This project involves the remodeling portions of the fifth and sixth floors to provide new security lobbies and to reconfigure existing floor plans to accommodate higher density of cubicles due to annexation. • Proposal Method: eCityGov.net small works roster • Proposal Opening Date: November 10, 2009 • Number of Bidders: Five (5) • Apparent Low Bidder: Landon Construction Group • Apparent Low Bid: $132,537.00 • Engineer's Estimate: $145,000.00 • Project Budget: This project is part of the overall Benson Hill Annexation budget of $1,500,000.00. • Funding Source: The Benson Hill Annexation budget (state reimbursement). • Bid Irregularities: None with this contractor • Staff Recommendation: Award the contract for the City Hall 5t` and 6th Floor Remodel to the apparent low bidder, Landon Construction Group, via council concur. Bid Award Memo 5th 6th flr 12-14-09 Cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang, Finance/IS Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Communications Page 1 of 1 e0tyGov Site Network: SharedProcurementPortal.com MyParksandRecreation.com MyBuildin,;Permit.corn NVVMaps.net NWPropery.net A _ C + C Ur _ ..... Home Application aid/RFP Information Roster Information Home Search Roster Communication Change Password Log Off mnolan F Show only my messages Back to List I `Email Subject: Invitation to Bid, Renton City Hall Message: You are invited to submit a bid for the Renton City Hall Fifth & Sixth Floor Remodel project. Bids will be received.until 12:00 p.m., noon, Tuesday, November 10th, 2009. Bids may be emaiied, faxed, or delivered in person to Michael Nolan, Renton City Hall, 1055 Grady Way, Renton, WA, 98055, phone (425) 430-6608, fax (425) 430-6603, email mnolan@rentonwa.gov . The project consists of remodeling areas on both the fifth and sixth floors of Renton City Hall including new offices, conference rooms, and lobby areas. The architects project estimate is $145,000. Bid documents will be available Tuesday, October 27, 2009. Plans, addenda, and plan holders list for this project are available on-line through Builders Exchange of Washington, Inc, at www.bxwa.com. At the bxwa site, click on "Posted Projects"; "Small Public Works Roster", "City of Renton Small Works Projects". To access the bid documents you will need to enter: User name: cityhall Password: bensonhill (This is the first time the City of Renton has used the eCityGov.net Small Works Roster or a .pass coded plan room at Builders Exchange, so bear with us as we work out all the details.) Questions about the project can be addressed to me via phone or email. Questions for the architect may be addressed to Judy Peterson at Heery International, 206-587-0473, jpeterso@heery.com A project walk-through will be held at City Hail at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, October 28, 2009. A second walk-through may be scheduled as needed. Meet in the first floor lobby of City Hail. Attendance by bidders is strongly recommended but not mandatory. Please note that the protect Time of Completion is 90 calendar days for both phases. Only contractors with adequate resources and availability to meet this schedule should submit bids. Attachment: None t ..�` LVt. ixin�gtoii x �r �►„� P, city or eothdr .,.< eCityGov Alliance I Contact Us Copyright, 2008 e0tyGov ANance. https:Hsharedprocurementportal.com/roster/admin/Communication-aspx 11 /24/2009 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Fire & Emergency Services Dept. Dept/Div/Board.. Safety & Support Services Staff Contact...... Mark Peterson x 7028 Subj ect: King County Basic Life Support (BLS) Contract January 1 — December 31, 2010 Exhibits: King County Contract #D39144D Amendment #1 Amendment Exhibit B - 2010 EMS Proposed Budget Recommended Action: Council Concur AI #: For Agenda of: December Agenda Status Consent............ Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance.......... Resolution.......... Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions..... Information......... Approvals: Legal Dept........ Finance Dept...... Other .... HR&RM Ili a Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $902,049.00 (Revenue) Revenue Generated......... $860,223.00 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The attached King County Basic Life Support (BLS) 2010 Amendment #1 to the Contract for Services from Seattle -King County Department of Public Health EMS provides a subsidy for the combined City of Renton, Fire District #25 and Fire District #40 EMS services. This one-year contract Amendment is effective from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The combined annual amount of $1,160,946.00 (City of Renton - $860,223.00; KCFD 25 - $101,719.00; KCFD 40 - $199,004.00) is based on the 2010 BLS funding formula (calculations include unincorporated ratios, assessed valuation (AV) amounts, and call volume amounts). The City will be paid the total amount and the two District contracts will be reduced by their portion in 2010. This distribution of funding is the annual entitlement of the 2008-2013 King County Levy funded from Real Property Taxes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the King County Basic Life Support Services 2010 Contract Amendment #1. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CONTRACT # D39144D CONTRACT AMENDMENT / CHANGE ORDER AMENDMENT # 1 PROJECT NAME: Basic Life Support Services PHSKC PROGRAM MONITOR: Mary Won CONTRACTOR: City of Renton Fire & Emergency Services Department 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98057 ORIGINAL CONTRACT START DATE: 1/1/09 AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: 1/1/10 This amendment effects the following changes: CHANGES TO CONTRACT BOILERPLATE 1. AMEND Page 1, FUNDING LEVEL for 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2010, TO READ $1,160,946.00 CHANGES TO CONTRACT EXHIBITS 1. AMEND Exhibit B, Budget, by adding the 2010 Budget as attached hereto. All other terms and conditions of the referenced contract shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this amendment to be executed and instituted on the date first written. KING COUNTY CONTRACTOR FOR King County Executive Date Signature Name (please type or print) Date EXHIBIT B I EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FUNDS 2010 PROPOSED BUDGET - BASK LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES Agency Name: City of Renton Fire & Emergency Services Department, KCFD #25 & KCFD #40 Contact Person: Mark Peterson Title: Deputy Fire Chief, Safety & Support Services Address: 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7028 BUDGET CATEGORY Salaries & Benefits: EMT salaries Other Salaries Overtime Subtotal Salaries: Subtotal Employee Benefits. - Subtotal Employee Salaries & Benefits: Other Costs: Medical Supplies & Equipment Office & Computer Supplies & Equipment Uniforms, Fire & Safety Supplies Dispatch - Communications Vehicle Maintenance Facility Costs Training Misc. Subtotal Other Costs: Total Operational Costs Capital Costs Subtotal Capital Costs Subtotal Operational &. Capital Reserves (saved or used): Signature GRAND TOTAL: Peterson, Deputy Fire Chief Amount Requested for BLS $ 886,472.00 $ $ $ 886,472.00 220,959.00 1,107,431.00 $ 53,515.00 $ 53,515.00 $ 1,160,946.00 $ 1,160,946.00 $ 1,160,946.00, /t1 2 7 � Dates CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Police Staff Contact...... Clark Wilcox Extension 7566 Subject: Occupational Health Services -Jail Inmate Health Care Exhibits: Issue Paper Copy of Contract Recommended Action: Council Concur For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent.............X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Approvals: Legal Dept ....... X.. Finance Dept...... Other....... H/R Risk Management X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... 206,121 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... 206,121 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City of Renton contracts with Occupational Health Services (OHS) from Valley Medical Center for health services within the jail. The only change in the 2010 contract is an approximate ten percent (10%) increase in the total contract amount. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Occupational Health Services (OHS) 2010 contract for jail health services and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 14, 2009 TO: Randy Corman, City Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: DL, Denis Law, Mayor /ram FROM: Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police STAFF CONTACT: Clark Wilcox, Commander (XT 7566) SUBJECT: Issue Paper — Occupational Health Services Contract ISSUE: Should the City of Renton continue its contract with Occupational Health Services (OHS) from Valley Medical Center for health services within the jail? BACKGROUND: OHS has provided jail medical services since 1995. The contract provides for 44 hours of nursing services and four hours of physician assistant services within the jail. Additionally, we have 24-hour on -call services provided under the contract and a psychiatric nurse practitioner available as well. The types of services that are provided under the contract include physical examinations and screening of inmates, evaluation and treatment of chronic health conditions, communicable disease control and prevention and medication management. Inmates that need follow-up care or diagnostic services that aren't provided within the jail are transported to OHS for evaluation and are billed in accordance with Exhibit A. The only change in the 2010 contract is an approximate six -percent increase in the total contract amount. The total amount for the 2010 contract is $206,121. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve the 2010 Occupational Health Services Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES AGREEMENT City of Renton Police Department Jail THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this day of , by and between the City of Renton (hereinafter the "City"), and Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County, a Washington municipal corporation d/b/a Occupational Health Services (hereinafter "OHS"). PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is for OHS to provide on -site health services at the City of Renton Police Department Jail (hereinafter the "Jail) an approximately fifty (50) bed unit, as well as various off -site health services for staff and inmates. IN CONSIDERATION _ OF THE PROMISES AND MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREINAFTER CONTAINED, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Responsibilities of OHS. A. Basic Contract Price Services. OHS agrees to provide the following services for the agreed annual contract price of Two Hundred and Six Thousand, One Hundred and Twenty One Dollars ($206,121.00) for 1 /01 /2010 to 12/31 /2010. (Exhibit A) i. Routine on -site (i.e., at the Jail) services provided by a Registered Nurse Forty-four (44) hours per week, and a Physician Assistant on -site up to Four (4) hours per week (schedule to be arranged in advance by the parties). OHS has the sole right, responsibility and authority to select and provide the staff needed to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. During such scheduled visits, OHS shall provide physical examinations at the Jail for inmates, and evaluation and treatment of inmates and police staff for minor medical needs. On -site services shall include: a. The cost of prescriptions shall be billed to the Jail. b. Blood collection for inmates or as requested for law enforcement purposes. C. Office medical supplies used to provide the above services. Occupational Health Services Agmt. City of Renton Police Department Jail ii. Off -Site Services: Twenty -Four (24) hour, Seven (7) days per week phone consultation service with a Registered Nurse and/or Physician Assistant. Such telephone consultations are limited to the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse or a Physician Assistant, respectively. B. Services Not Included. Services not provided in the annual price set forth above are additional services not described in Paragraph A, above, including but not limited to hospitalization, emergency transportation and emergency room visits, physician visits, or other specialty care. C. Services in Addition to Basic Contract Price. OHS agrees to make available the following services at the usual and customary price ("UCP") that OHS charges for them. The services listed in Exhibit A are NOT included in the Two Hundred and Six Thousand, One Hundred and Twenty One Dollars ($ 206,121 .00) for 01 /01 /2010 to 12/31 /2010 contract price. The UCPs are subject to periodic review and adjustment: (Exhibit A) Work -related treatment of Jail staff at the Occupational Health Clinics in Renton and Auburn will be billed to L&I. Treatment for non -work related conditions will be billed to the patient with payment expected from the individual patient, or some other entity on his/her behalf (i.e., insurance). D. Professional Qualifications and Liability Insurance. Staff provided by OHS will meet all appropriate licensure requirements and will maintain professional liability insurance coverage in an amount not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per claim. E. Indemnification/Hold Harmless. OHS shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, error or omissions of OHS in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City." 2. Responsibilities of Jail. A. Liability. The Jail assumes all responsibility for any harm to OHS staff while performing the duties specified in this Agreement, or while on -site for that purpose, when such harm is caused by negligence on the part of the City of Renton. OHS shall be Occupational Health Services Agmt. City of Renton Police Department Jail responsible for the direct medical care provided to staff and inmates pursuant to this Agreement. OHS is not required to perform or pay any charges for ancillary services. B. Medical Records/Consent. All medical records shall be the property of OHS. The Jail is responsible for obtaining or providing the necessary medical consent for the healthcare services provided herein. C. Payment of Fees. The Jail agrees to pay a total of Two Hundred and Six Thousand, One Hundred and Twenty One Dollars ($206,121.00) in Twelve (12) monthly installments of Seventeen Thousand One Hundred, and Twenty One Dollars ($17,177.00) for the basic contract services outlined above. The Jail further agrees to pay all charges incurred by the Jail for the ancillary services, not included in the basic annual fee, outlined above. OHS will send a detailed invoice each month, and payment shall be made within Thirty (30) days following receipt of the invoice. In the event that the Jail fails to pay any amount when due, the delinquent amount shall bear interest at the maximum rate of interest allowable by law. Non-payment for services may result in termination of this Agreement, at the discretion of OHS, upon Ten (10) days notice to the Jail. D. Indemnification/Hold Harmless. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold OHS, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, error or omissions of the City in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the OHS." 3. Mutual Responsibilities and Miscellaneous Terms: A. Term of Agreement/Termination The term of this Agreement shall be Twelve (12) months, commencing January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2010. The Agreement shall automatically renew for Twelve (12) month periods on the anniversary hereof. The parties shall discuss in good faith any price modifications on or near such anniversary date. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time, without cause, by providing the other party with at least Ninety (90) days written notice of its intentions. OHS shall be paid as provided hereunder for all services rendered and costs incurred to the date of termination. Occupational Health Services Agmt. City of Renton Police Department Jail B. Confidentiality. Both parties agree that medical records will be handled in accordance with Chapter 70.02 RCW, and will comply with all other existing Washington State and federal confidentiality laws. C. Dispute Resolution. Should any dispute or disagreement arise over the terms of this Agreement or from the performance thereof, both parties agree to submit the dispute to binding arbitration, in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. D. Attorneys Fees. If legal proceedings are instituted by either party in connection with this Agreement, the party not prevailing agrees to pay the costs and expenses of litigation, including reasonable attorney's fees of the prevailing party. E. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any right or obligation arising thereunder may be assigned or delegated by either party without the written consent of the other, provided that health services required of OHS hereunder may be provided by OHS contract providers. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to imply a joint venture, principal, agent, or employer -employee relationship between the Jail and OHS. F. Laws of the State. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. G. Primary Contacts. For the purposes of administering this Agreement, the primary OHS contact person is Grace Casey, Account Manager, or her successor. The primary contact at the Jail is Commander Clark Wilcox. Occupational Health Services Agmt. City of Renton Police Department Jail IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. City of Renton: OHS: Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County, d/b/a Occu Tonal alth Services By By Denis Law, Mayor Paul M. Larson Administrator, Clinic Services ATTEST: M Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Occupational Health Services Agmt. City of Renton Police Department Jail EXHIBIT A FEE SCHEDULE BASIC PROGRAM COMPONENTS FEE Clinical Staff and Services Registered/Licensed Nurse & Physician Assistant January 1, 2010- December 31, 2010 Malpractice Insurance $206,121.00 Trained clinicians for back-up/coverage Medical Director Oversight On -site services 48 hours/week Injury and illness treatment services 14-day Health Appraisal Exam services (see lab fees below) Administration of vaccinations & TB tests Basic dental services, i.e. tooth blocking & pain relief Triage System Medication Administration 24 hour Telephone Consultation Services Included in annual rate Access to clinical staff 24 hours/day, 7 days/week Telephone Consultation Guidelines Policies/Procedures & Clinical Guidelines Included in annual rate Operational Policies & Procedures Clinical Protocols, Practice Parameters, & Triage Guidelines Dental Services Usual and customary rates Appointment Coordination Included in annual rate Ongoing Medical Records Management Included in annual rate Initial Photocopying of Records One time fee at usual and customary rates Insurance Billing Included in annual rate Program Set -Up, Management & Medical Oversight Included in annual rate Program Set-up Recruiting, Hiring,.Credentialing Staff Training Scheduling Medical Records System Operational Maintenance Access to Medical Director and Clinic Director Regular business hours Quarterly Meeting Attendance Ongoing Personnel Management Problem -Solving Identifying Service Gaps Medical Oversight Access to Medical Oversight 24 hours/day, 7 days/week Quarterly Meeting Attendance Quality Assurance Quality Improvement Scope of Practice Monitoring Referral Monitoring CONTRACT FOR SERVICES —Oct 2010 CITY OF RENTON/VMC-OHS EXHIBIT A w ADDITIONAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS FEE Supplies & Medication Stocking No additional charge for inventory monitoring. Actual goods billed at OHS' cost. Delivery of Medication Daily Delivery of Prescription Medication (Monday -Friday) No additional charge Weekend and Emergency Deliveries Arranged at a negotiated rate Occupational and Employee Health Services On -the -Job Injuiy Triage System No additional charge On -site Employee Health Services To be priced at competitive rates but Flu Shots provided on -site for convenience TB Skin Test Hepatitis B, Series of Three Injections (includes vaccine) Hepatitis B, Injection only Hepatitis B Titer Hepatitis B Vaccine - Booster Drug Screen, Collection and Lab Processing Drug Screen, Collection Only Medical Review Officer Services Breath Alcohol Test Breath Alcohol Test Confirmation f A tAi' `c �T✓+'fiY 4' z4z"sx.«.�, ''...�itC f' FiG tf ". �5,* % - a�ii.'C�s iA 1;%hiA. "_e r[ !Ah �&Y 'frs'' y� OPTIONAL SERVICES FEE Transportation No additional charge for coordination res onsibilities Services Not in Jail Health Service Guidelines On -site Physician Services $225/hour X-Ray Usual and customary rates Urgent Care Services (available Monday -Friday, 6:00am-6:00pm, OHS fee schedule (based on the Dept. at OHS Renton, and 6:00am-6:00pm at OHS Auburn) of Labor and Industries fee schedule) Emergency Services at VMC's Emergency Department Usual and customary rates Psychiatric Services $150/hour for 3 hours a month CONTRACT FOR SERVICES —Oct 2010 CITY OF RENTON/VMC-OHS CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Public Works Department For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bill Wressell, Project Manager Extension 7400 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps Correspondence.. With Western Asphalt, Inc. Ordinance ............. CAG 09-092 Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... X Exhibits: Final Pay Estimate Study Sessions...... Notice of Completion Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Council Concur Finance Dept...... Other ............. Fiscal Impact: 317.012108 Expenditure Required $ 27,974.39 Final Pay Estimate Transfer/Amendment.. 0 Amount Budgeted... Revenue Generated. 0 Street Overlay Program $ 1,435,000.00 Arterial Rehab Program $ 310,000.00 Water Capital Improvement Program $ 26,758.74 Total $ 1,771,758.74 City Share Total Project 100 Total Project Budget $ 1,771,758.74 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The project started on July 27, 2009, and was completed on December 3, 2009. The original contract amount was $1,166,719.45 and the final contract amount is $1,356,383.98. The increased cost of $189,664.53 was mainly due to two change orders (attached). Charge Order #1 ($166,390.41) includes the cost of patching Puget Drive prior to the overlay. This was added to the contract to allow Renton's street crew to provide other services. Change Order #2 ($22,414.50) involves overlaying a settling trench across Carr Road to protect the safety of the traveling public. Of the $1,356,383.98 final contract amount the following amounts will be paid by: 1) Street Overlay Program in the amount of $1,019,625.24; 2) Arterial Rehabilitation Program in the amount of $310,000; and, 3) Water Main Improvement Program in the amount of $26,758.74. The contractor, Western Asphalt, Inc. has a retainage bond on file with the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept completion of the project and approve payment of the Final Pay Estimate in the amount of $27,974.39. C:\Documents and Settings\JSeth\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\SPSDK6FZ\2009 Street Overlay Final Pay Estimate (2).doc TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR: Western Asphalt, Inc. CONTRACT NO. CAC 09-092 ESTIMATE NO. 5 Final PROJECT: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $27,974.39 2. SALES TAX @ 9.50% $0.00 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $27,974.39 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $1,326,088.05 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $27,974.39 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $1,354,062.44 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $2,321.54 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $0.00 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX $2,321.54 * (95%uzLINEI) ** (RETAINAGE. S%) GRAND TOTAL: $1,356,383.98 , FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): Transportation -Street Overlay ACCOUNT T12108.fD09.0018.0002 $27,974.39 #4 Transportation -Arterial Rehabilitation ACCOUNT T12186.fU09.0018.0002 $0.00 #4 _Water Eneineerint=_-Water Main Replacement Project ACCOUNT 425.000000.018.5950.0034.63.000000.U55170 $0.00 #4 $27,974.39 l 4 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $27,97439 �/ l CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION 1, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM SIGNED: • The Contractor (Western Asphalt, Inc.) has a retainage bond on file with the City SIGNATURES: Contractor: Project Manager: Approved By: (Transportation Design Engineer) Approved By: (Transportation Design Supervisor) Date:�0 / Date: Date: Date: Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS Contractor: Western Asohalt. Inc. Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. Quantity Price 11/9 11/10 11/12 11/20 12/3 Previous Previous This This Total Total Quantity Amount Quantity Amount Quantity Amount SCHEDULE"A" 001. MOBILIZATION Lump Sum 1.00 $2,400.00 0.40 $960.00 0.00 $0.00 0.40 $960.00 002. PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL Lump Sum 1.00 $7,100.00 0.40 $2,840.00 0.00 $0.00 0.40 $2,840.00 003. HMA CL. 1/2 IN, PG 64-22 Overlay Ton 549.00 $65.00 177.00 $11,505.00 0.00 $0.00 177.00 $11,505.00 004. REMOVING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ. YD. 21345.00 $2.20 799.00 $1,757.80 0.00 $0.00 799.00 $1,757.80 BY COLD PLANING 005. ADJUST MONUMENT Each 1.00 $200.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 006. ADJUST MANHOLE Each 5.0d $340.00 2.00 $680.00 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $680.00 007. ADJUST WATER VALVE Each 8.00 $150.00 10.00 $1,500.00 0.00 $0.00 10.00 $1,500.00 008. ADJUST GAS VALVE Each 2.00 $150.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 009. ADJUST CATCH BASIN Each 3.00 $300.00 1.00 $300.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $300.00 010. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 134.00 $1.77 53.00 $93.81 0.00 $0.00 53.00 $93.81 TYPE 1, YELLOW 011. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT, MARKER Each 32.00 $4.07 10.00 $40.70 0.00 $0.00 10.00 $40.70 TYPE 2d, YELLOW 012. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 3.00 $8.77 2.00 $17.54 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $17.54 TYPE 2, BLUE 013. PLASTIC CROSSWALK LIN. FT. 460.00 $2.37 220.00 $521.40 0.00 $0.00 220.00 $521.40 014. 18" PLASTIC STOP BAR LIN. FT. 32.00 $4.17 13.00 $54.21 0.00 $0.00 13.00 $54.21 015. INDUCTION LOOPS - Each 3.00 $800.00 3.00 $2,400.00 0.00 $0.00 3.00 $2,400.00 016. CURB RP MENT CONCRETE Each 2.00 $800.00 1.00 $800.00 0.00 $0.00 $800.00 Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS -..o-- f- mlocmm A-holf 1- Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12103/2009 Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. QuantityPrice 11/9 11/10 11/12 11/20 12/3 Previous Previous This This Total Total Quanti Amount Quantity Amount Quantity Amount TYPE 106.1 017. SAWCUT CONCRETE LN. FT. 14.00 $2.00 57.00 $114.00 0.00 $0.00 57.00 $114.00 018. SAWCUT ASPHALT LN.FT. 64.00 $1.00 104.00 $104.00 0.00 $0.00 104.00 $104.00 019. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE Ton 4.00 $26.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 020. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN. FT. 56.00 .. $2.60 25.00 $65.00 0.00 $0.00 25.00 $65.00 021. REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK/CURB RAMP SQ. YD. 26.00 $15.55 14.00 $217.70 0.00 $0.00 14.00 $217.70 022. REMOVE ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER SQ. YD. 12.00 $15.55 2.00 $31.10 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $31.10 023. INSTALL ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER Ton 3.00 $103.00 0.65 $66.95 0.00 $0.00 0.65 $66.95 024. TOPSOIL TYPE A Ton 1.00 $66.50 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 025. INSTALL SOD SQ. YD 5.00 $13.80 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 026. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Lump Sum :...- 1.00 $500.00 0.40 $200.00 0.00 $0.00 0.40 $200.00 027. FINISH AND CLEANUP Lump20 Sum 1.00 $4.00 0.00 $168.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $168.00 SCHEDULE"B" 001. MOBILIZATION Lump Sum 1.00 $38,400.00 002. PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL Lump Sum 1.00 $52.600.00 003. HMA CL. 1/2 " PG 64-22 OVERLAY Ton 7,498.00 $65.00 004. REMOVING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ. YD. 13,555.00 $2 20 BY COLD PLANING yu.uu 9.5% Sales Tax $0.00 Total Schedule A $0.00 1.00 $38,400.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $52.600.00 0.00 $0.00 759.45 $490,714.25 0.00 $0.00 15702.73 $34,546.01 0.001 $0.00 acv,4a r.c 1 $2,321.53 $26,758.74 (� JP1�' 1.00 $38,460.00 1.00 $52,600.00 759.45 $490.714.25 15702.73 $34,546.01 t�inannrw Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS %A/o.m.., Acnhalt Inn Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. QuantityPrice 11/9 11/10 11/12 11/20 12/3 Previous Previous This This Total Total QuantityAmount QuantityAmount Quantit Amount 005. REMOVE ACP FROM TOP OF GUTTER LIN. FT. 200.00 $1.50 216.00 $324.00 0.00 $0.00 216.00 $324.00 006. ADJUST MONUMENT Each 4.00 $200.00 5.00 $1,000.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $1,000.00 A07. ..-ADJUST MANHOLE Each 44.00 $340.00 4.00 34.00 $11,560.00 4.00 $1,360.00 38.00 $12,920.00 008. ADJUST WATER VALVE Each , 44.00 150.00 6.00 44.00 $6,600.00 6.00 $900.00 50.00 $7,500.00 009. ADJUST CATCH BASIN Each 8.00 $340.00 3.00 5.00 $1,700.00 3.00 $1,020.00 8.00 $2,720.00 010. ADJUST GAS VALVE Each 3.00 $150.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 011.. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 4,126.00 $1.77 56.00 4410.00 $7,805.70 56.00 $99.12 4466.00 $7,904.82 TYPE 1,YELLOW 012. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each . . 470.00 $4.17 12.00 591.00 $2,464.47 12.00 $50.04 603.00 $2,514.51 TYPE 2d, YELLOW 013. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 897.00 $1.70 1561.00 $2,653.70 0.00 $0.00 1561.00 $2,653.70 TYPE 1, WHITE 014. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each , 175.00 $4.00 299.00 $1.196.00 0.00 $0.00 299.00 $1,196.00 TYPE 2e, WHITE 015. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 28:00 $8.77 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 TYPE 2, BLUE 016. •- Pl ASTIC,CROSSWALK--- - LIN. FT. 1,870.00 $2.37 2005.00 $4,751.85 0.00 $0.00 2005.00 $4,751.85 017. 18" PLASTIC STOPBAR LIN. FT. 211.00 $4.17 146.00 $608.82 0.00 $0.00 146.00 $608.82 018: PLASTIC ARROW Each 10.00 $35.00 22.00 $770.00 0.00 $0.00 22.00 $770.00 019. INDUCTION LOOPS Each 18.00 $580.00 18.00 $10,440.00 0.00 $0.00 18.00 $10,440.00 020. 4" WHITE EDGE OF ROAD LINE LIN. FT. 5,584.00 $0.17 5400.00 $918.00 0.00 $0.00 5400.00 $918.00 021. CURB RAMENT CONCRETE Each 2.00 $800.00 1.00 $800.00 0.00 $0.00 $800.00 TYPE 105 Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Contractor: Western AS natt, Inc. Item Description Unit Est. Unit 1 No. 0.-HW Price 11/9 11/10 11/12 11120 12/3 Previous Previous This This Total Total Quantitv Amount QuantitV Amount Quantity Amount 022. CURB RAMP, CEMENT CONCRETE Each 24.00 $800.00 27.00 $21,600.00 0.00 $0.00 27.00 $21,600.00 TYPE 106.1 023. CURB RAMP, CEMENT CONCRETE Each 7.00 $800.00 5.00 $4,000.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $4,000.00 TYPE 107.1 024. CURB RAMP, CEMENT CONCRETE Each 1.00 $800.00 1.00 $800.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $800.00 TYPE 4A 025. RETROFIT TRUNCATED DOMES ON SQ. FT. 6.00 $55.00 24.00 $1,320.00 0.00 $0.00 24.00 $1,320.00 EXISTING CURB RAMPS 026. SAWCUT CONCRETE LIN. FT. 303.00 $2.00 257.00 $515.00 0.00 $0.00 257.00 $515.00 027. SAWCUT ASPHALT LIN. FT. 962.00 $1.00 1700.75 $1,700.75 0.00 $0.00 1700.75 $1,700.75 028. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE Ton 40.00 $26.00 68.32 $1,776.32 0.00 $0.00 68.32 $1,776.32 029. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN. FT. 906.00 . $2.60 760.90 $1,978.34 0.00 $0.00 760.90 $1,978.34 030, REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK/CURB RAMP SQ. YD. 552.50 $15.55 577.50 $8,980.13 0.00 $0.00 577.50 $8,980.13 031. REMOVE ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER SQ. YD. 234.00 $15.55 242.60 $3,772.44 0.00 $0.00 242.60 $3,772.44 032. CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER LIN. FT. 148.00 $22.00 246.50 $5,423.00 0.00 $0.00 246.50 $5,423.00 -033. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. YD. 145.00 $29.00 232.74 $6,749.46 0.00 $0.00 232.74 $6,749.46 034. INSTALL ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER Ton 53.00 $103.00 52.79 $5,437.37 0.00 $0.00 52.79 $5,437.37 035.• TOPSOIL TYPE A Ton 20.25 $66.50 1.00 19.00 $1,263.50 1.00 $66.50 20.00 $1,330.00 036. INSTALL SOD SQ. YD. 83.50 $13.80 4.40 89.00 $1,228.20 4.40 $60.72 93.40 $1,288.92 037. RELOCATE SIGN Each 5.00 $200.00 7.00 $1,400.00 0.00 $0.00 7.00 $1,400.00 038. ADJUST UTILITY BOX IN CURB RAMP Each 8.00 $10.00 9.00 $90.00 0.00 $0.00 9.00 $90.00 Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. Quantity Price 11/9 11/10 11/12 11J20 12/3 Previous Previous This This Total Total Quantity Amount Quantitv Amount Quanti Amount 039. INSTALL BEAUTY BARK CU. YD. 2.50 $217.00 1.03 1.00 0.00 $0.00 2.03 $440.51 2.03 $440.51 040. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Lump Sum 1.00 $500.00 1.00 $500.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $500.00 .D41. FINISH AND CLEANUP Lump Sum 1.00 $420.00 1.00 $420.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $420.00 042. HMA FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR 5" Ton 1,023.00 $91.50 1060.80 $97,063.20 0.00 $0.00 1060.80 $97,063.20 041 HMA FOR WIDENING 2" Ton 214.00 $91.50 186.26 $17,042.79 0.00 $0.00 186.26 $17,042.79 044. PAV EXC INCLUDING HAUL 5" SQ. YD., 3,689.00 $13.15 3699.83 $48,652.76 0.00 $0.00 3699.83 $48,652.76 045. SHOULDER PREP FOR WIDENING SQ. YD. 1,924.00 $2.44 1436.32 $3,504.62 0.00 $0.00 1436.32 $3,504.62 046. GRIND AND PAVE CARR RD LS 1.00 $23364.00 1.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $23,364.00 1.00 $23,364.00 SCHEDULE"C" 001. MOBILIZATION Lump Sum 1.00 002. PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL Lump Sum 1.00 003. HMA CL. 1/2 IN. PG 64-22 .. Ton 3,488.00 4". DEEP JN TWO 2"LIFTS .-...-. 004.' . REMOVING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ. Y.D. 15,297.00 BY COLD PLANING-2" DEEP 005. REMOVE ROAD BASE-4" DEEP SQ. YD. 15,297.00 006. ADJUST MONUMENT Each 13.00 007. ADJUST MANHOLE Each 6.00 008. ADJUST BASIN Each 1.00 $20,000.00 $23,300.00 $65.00 $1.06 $3.12 $200.00 $340.00 $340.00 I otal Jcneauie tl $2r,wu.69 iP 1.00 $20,000.00 1.00 $23,300.00 3943.25 $256,317.10 14183.11 $15,034.10 0.00 14276.11 $44,541.46 0.0C 18.00 $3,600.00 0.0c 0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $932,431.57 J� 1.00 $20,000.00 1.00 $23,300.00 3943.25 $256,317.10 14183.11 $0.00 14276.11 $0.00 18.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $15,034.10 $44,541.46 $3,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS r-f-f- W-f- A -halt Inc Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. QuantityPrice 11/9 11/10 11/12 11120 1213 Previous Previous .This This Total Total Quantit Amount Quantity Amount Quantity Amount 009. ADJUST GAS VALVE Each 2.00 $150.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 010. 4" RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER Each 10.00 $8.77 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 TYPE 2, BLUE 011. 18" PLASTIC STOPBAR LIN. FT. 45.00 $4.17 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 012. CURB RAMP, CEMENT CONCRETE Each 9.00 $800.00 9.00 $7,200.00 0.00 $0.00 9.00 $7,200.00 TYPE 106.1 013. CURB RAMP, CEMENT CONCRETE Each 2.00 $800.00 2.00 $1,600.00 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $1,600,00 TYPE 4A 014. RETROFIT TRUNCATED DOMES ON SQ. FT. 6.00 $55.00 24.00 $1,320.00 0.00 $0.00 24.00 $1,320.00 EXISTING CURB RAMPS 015. SAWCUT CONCRETE LIN. FT. 130.00 $2.00 134.00 $268.00 0.00 $0.00 134.00 $268.00 016. SAWCUT ASPHALT LIN. FT. 368.00 $1.00 298.00 $298.00 0.00 $0.00 298.00 $298.00 017. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE Ton 1,200.00 $11.60 1234.95 $14,325.42 0.00 $0.00 1234.95 $14,325.42 018. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN. FT. 302.00 $2.60 291.00 $756.60 0.00 $0.00 291.00 $756.60 --019. - -REMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALK/CURB RAMP SQ. YD. 157.50 $15.55 156.70 $2,436.69 0.00 $0.00 156.70 $2,436.69 020. REMOVE ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER SQ. YD. 69.00. $16.55 21.30 $331.22 0.00 $0.00 21.30 $331.22 021. CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER LIN. FT. 12.50 $29.00 82.00 $2,378.00 0.00 $0.00 82.00 $2,378.00 022. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. YD. 38.40 $29.00 50.00 $1,450.00 0.00 $0.00 50.00 $1,4%00 023. INSTALL ASPHALT AT CURB AND GUTTER Ton 18.50 $103.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 024. TOPSOIL TYPE A Ton 3.00 $66.50 3.00 0.00 $0.00 3.00 $199.50 3.00 $199.50 Project: 2009 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS Contract Number: CAG 09-092 Closing Date: 12/03/2009 Contractor: Western Asphalt, Inc. Item Description Unit Est. Unit No. QuantityPrice 11/9 11/10 11/12 11120 12/3 PreviousThis Total Total y Amount Quantit Amount QuantityAmount 22.00 $303.60 30.00 $414.00 52.00 $717.60 SO. YD. 23.50 $13.80 30.00 025. INSTALL SOD 1.00 $200.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $200.00 026. RELOCATE SIGN Each 2.00 $200.00 1.00 $500.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $500.00 027. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Lump Sum 1.00 $500.00 1.00 $420.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $4 00 028. FINISH AND CLEANUP Lum Sum 1.00 $420.00 _ Total Schedule C $613.50�� $397,193.93.6969 SIGNATURES Contractor: /. octe Project Manager: � Approved By: Tra atio esign Engineer) Approved By: (Transportation Design Supervisor) Total all Schedules(A+B+C) $27,974.39 $1,356,384.00 Date: �� O Date: l� /�`�/ dcyi Date: 7 2, ¢! I Date: (2 0 2009 esi.xr 1 a C.O. #1 CITY OF RENTON Page 1 of 1 Public Works Department CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER AGREEMENT CONTRACT: 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps CAG-09-092 1 CONTRACTOR: Western Asphalt, Inc. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE: Reason/Justification: Construction will begin for the 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps on Monday, July 27, 2009. Puget Drive needs to be patched before it is overlaid. The Street Section needs to move on to other projects. Western is better set up to handle these patches (3,689 square yards) in a timely manner. 'Contract Change: Add items for asphalt patching and lane widening. Arlrl naw hirl ifpmc fn fha ce hprfnla of nrirps /Snhprinlp Rl Item No. Approx Quantity Units Description Unit Price Amount 42 Added 1,023 Ton HMA for Pavement Repair 5" $ 91.50 $ 93,604.50 43 Added 214 Ton HMA for Widening 2" $ 91.50 $ 19,581.00 4 Added 3,689 SY Pav Exc Including Haul 5" $ 13.15 $ 48,510.35 45 Added 1,924 SY Shoulder Prep for Widening $ 2.44 $ 4,694.56 i otai tors unange vraer. b -10osay.4-t All work, materials and measurement to be in accordance with the provisions of the Standard Specifications and Special Provisions for the type of construction involved. ORIGINAL CONTRACT CURRENT CONTRACT ESTIMATE NET CHANGE ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT AMOUNT THIS ORDER TOTAL AFTER CHANGE $ 1,166,719.45 $ 1,166,719.45 $166,390.41 $1,333,109.86 SIGNATURES: Contractor: Project Manager: Approved By: Approved By: (Transportation Systems Division Director) Date: i — Z T - cif► Date: :7- -2-3-0c,. Date: Date: C.O. #2 CITY OF RENTON Page 1 of 1 Public Works Department CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER AGREEMENT CONTRACT: 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps CAG-09-092 CONTRACTOR: Western Asphalt, Inc. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE: Reason/Justification: There is an area on Carr Road that is sinking over a culvert. The road is getting worse and there could be an accident caused by this failure if the road isn't repaired. Wester Asphalt, Inc., this year's Overlay Contractor has agreed to overlay the sunken area. Contract Change: Add item for asphalt grinding and patching. ~4411Item ApproxVN VyvUnits Description Unit Price Amount No. I Quantity 46 Added 33 Ton I HMA for Pavement Repair 5" 1 LS 1 $ 22,414.50 e nn A4A en vao. u..a ......y- ....+.... . --. ...__ All work, materials and measurement to be in accordance with the provisions of the Standard Specifications and Special Provisions for the type of construction involved. ORIGINAL CONTRACT CURRENT CONTRACT ESTIMATE NET CHANGE ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT AMOUNT THISORDER TOTAL AFTER CHANGE $1,166,719.45 $1,260,323.95 $22,414.50 $1,282,738.45 SIGNATURES: Contractor: Project Manager: Approved By: Approved By: (Transportation Systems Division Director) Date: �J C Date: Z— Date: Date: EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4 STATgo� State of Washington Reg.No.: 0 6 Department of Revenue w - r Audit Procedures & Administration Date: December 4, 2009 y° PO Box 47474 Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2132 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract 2009 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps CAG-09-092 Contractor's Name Western Asphalt, Inc. Telephone No. (206) 624-4433 Contractor's Address PO BOX 980 Maple Valley, Wa. 98038 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted July 27, 2009 December 3, 2009 December 3, 2009 Surety or Bonding Co. First National Insurance Company of America Agent's Address Holly Ulfers Kibble and Prentice 601 Union Street. Suite 1000 Seattle, Wa. 98101-4064 Contract Amount: Additions or Reductions Sales Tax:. Total $ 1,166,719.45 $ 187,342.99 $ 2,321.54 $ 1,356,383.98 By Phone No: Amount Disbursed: $ 1,356,383.98 Amount Retained: $ 0.00 Total: $ 1,356,383.98 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) H:forms/notcomplt/ CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... Public Works Department Utility Systems Division/ Surface Water Utility Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Edward Mulhern (ext. 7323) Subject: CAG-09-134, Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Marshall and Associates, Inc. for the City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventor) Exhibits: Issue Paper Addendum No. 1 Mavving Proiect. Al #: For Agenda of: December 14, 2009 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... X Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other.........? .-. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $119,518 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $482,000 (2009) Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $482,000 (2009) City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project requires an addendum to CAG-09-134. Addendum No. 1 will increase efficiency in data collection on right-of-way assets. This addendum will add a task to the contract scope of work for collecting Video Asset Data of right-of-way utilities using a Mobile Asset Collection System van. The purpose for collecting this video data is to augment the existing data in the City's Geographic Information System and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase II field survey portion of the Storm System Inventory Mapping Project. The project is funded from the Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Fund 427 for the Storm System Field Mapping Project (427\U65455) with adequate Surface Water Utility CIP funds ($482,000) available to cover the increased consultant costs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement, CAG-09-134, with Marshall and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $119,518, to assist the City with additional scoped data collection and extend the contract duration through December 31, 2010. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3472 Storm Mapping Project\1100 Consultant- Corresp\Addendum\Marshall-AgendaBill-Addenduml.doc\EMtp PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT p ^CMOf�O� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 3, 2009 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor���� FROM: `f Gregg Zimmerma[0, rdministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Engineering Supervisor (ext. 7248) Edward Mulhern, Surface Water Engineer (ext. 7323) SUBJECT: CAG-09-134, Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Marshall and Associates, Inc. for the City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project. ISSUE: Should Council approve Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement, CAG-09-134, with Marshall and Associates, Inc. for the Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project, in the amount of $119,518, with the additional work completed in 2010? RECOMMENDATION: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement, CAG-09-134, with Marshall and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $119,518, to add a task to the contract scope of work for collecting Video Asset Data of right-of-way utilities using a Mobile Asset Collection System van. The purpose for collecting this video data is to augment the existing data in the City's Geographic Information System and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase 2 field survey portion of the Storm System Inventory Mapping Project. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The purpose of the Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project is to meet state and federal regulatory requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping of the City's storm systems, outfalls, tributary basin areas and land uses in basins, along with data about the storm system asset (pipe type, material, size, and other attributes). This information is needed to meet the illicit discharge and elimination and public and private inspection and maintenance program requirements of the Ecology Phase 11 NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit). The Mr. Corman, Council President December 3, 2009 Page 2 of 3 information will also help the utility in the maintenance and operation of the City's storm system, future capital improvement program planning and reporting requirements of the NPDES Permit needed to demonstrate compliance. This will allow the Surface Water Utility to accurately display the City's storm system in the City's GIS, which will improve access to information for other City employees, the public, and development applicants and also improve work efficiency and customer service. On June 30, 2009, the City initiated Phase 1 of the mapping project by entering into a contract (CAG 09-134) with Marshall and Associates, Inc. to provide engineering services for storm drainage data collection, interpretation, input, data base design, and integration into the City's GIS. The City will authorize Phase 2 of the project as a separate contract that will build upon existing (Phase 1) work when it is completed. It will consist of the field surveying and data collection to complete storm systems mapping in areas where it was not possible to obtain the data from as -built drawings of the storm systems or from other methods (i.e. Addendum No. 1 task). Addendum No. 1 would add to the Phase 1 contract scope of work a task to facilitate a comprehensive collection of utility data prior to the field data collection in Phase 2. The addendum would add a right-of-way Video Asset Data Collection task using a Mobile Asset Collection System (MAC) to collect the data. The addendum also adds Data Transfer Services (DTS) of Orlando, FL as a subcontractor to accomplish this task. The purpose of the addendum is to use DTS collected data to augment the existing data in the City's GIS and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase 2 portion of the project. Additional tasks by Marshall and DTS are to tie the extracted asset data to data residing in the GIS and related as -built drawings. With this additional data, it is possible to more accurately pinpoint where field data collection with standard field survey methods would be needed to fill in missing data, and to more accurately estimate the costs associated with Phase 2 of the project. Capturing the MAC data during Phase 1 would ensure that the data is formatted for compatibility with Phase 1 data inventory analysis, and input to the City's GIS. With this work accomplished, Phase 2 field work would then be limited to only those assets with insufficient data and assets for which there is still no data (i.e. those unable to be inventoried by the MAC van). The benefit to the overall project is reduced field survey work and associated costs. Addendum No. 1 would be comprised of the following task elements: • Mobile Data Collection Planning • Mobile Data Collection H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3472 Storm Mapping Project\1100 Consultant-Corresp\Addendum\Issue Paper-Addenduml.doc\EMtp Mr. Corman, Council President December 3, 2009 Page 3 of 3 • Post -Processing • Storm Drainage Asset Data Extraction • GIS-Based Delivery The Surface Water Utility has sufficient funding to support implementation of the Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project in the approved 2009 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budget. Project funding of $447,000 is appropriated in the Storm System Field Mapping — NPDES Permit account (427/u65455). The original scoped fees totaled $132,646. The increased scope costs for the Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project ($119,518) increases the total consultant costs to $252,164 with the additional work completed in 2010. This project is funded from the Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budget (427/u065455) with adequate Surface Water Utility CIP funds, in the amount of $482,000. CONCLUSION: This addendum is needed to increase efficiency in data collection on right-of-way assets. Addendum No. 1 would add a task for collecting Video Asset Data of right-of-way utilities using a Mobile Asset Collection System van. The purpose for collecting this video data is to augment the existing data in the City's Geographic Information System and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase 2 field survey portion of the inventory mapping project. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director File H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3472 Storm Mapping Project\1100 Consultant-Corresp\Addendum\Issue Paper-Addenduml.doc\EMtp ADDENDUM NO. 1 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES for City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm and Surface Water Management Plan CAG-09-134 This Addendum is made and entered into this, day of I by and between the City of Renton, hereinafter called the "City', and Marshall and Associates, Inc. whose address is, 1603 Cooper Point Road NW, Olympia, Washington 98502-8325, hereinafter called the "Consultant". WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the City engaged the services of the consultant under Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG 09-134, dated June 30, 2009 to provide engineering services necessary for the City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to complete the work associated with the City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project, and the City does not have sufficient qualified engineering employees to perform the work within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the City desires to increase data collection efficiency of right-of-way utility assets by collecting video data to augment the existing data in the City GIS, and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase II field survey portion of the inventory mapping project; and WHEREAS, the City and consultant have determined that additional work for the City of Renton Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping Project is required, such additional work items and costs being shown in Addendum No. 1, Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section VIII, Extra Work of the Master Agreement CAG 09- 134, dated June 30, 2009, it is mutually agreed upon that Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG 09-134, is amended to include the work and associated budget as follows: 1. The maximum amount payable for the additional work items defined in the attached Scope of Work associated with this Contract (CAG-09-134) Addendum No. 1 is $119,518. 2. The revised contract total payable for work on this contract addendum is increased from $132,646, to $252,164, making a difference of $119,518. 3. The term of the contract (CAG-09-134) to allow for completion of the Addendum No. 1 work is extended until December 31, 2010. All other provisions of Consultant Agreement CAG 09-134 dated June 30, 2009 shall apply to this addendum. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3472 Storm Mapping Project\1100 Consultant- Corresp\Addendum\Marshall ADDENDUM 1.doc\EMtp EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 1 to ENGINEERING CONSULTANT AGREEMENT CAG-09-134 as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT Signature Date Type or Print Name Title CITY OF RENTON Denis Law, Mayor Attest: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3472 Storm Mapping Project\1100 Consultant- Corresp\Addendum\Marshall ADDENDUM l.doc\EMtp > i � G K h SuRFACE WATER UTILITY Zi„ S�'ORM SYSTEM INVENTORY; MOPPING Y r , AkbDENDUM NO 1 S � is kt „ ExHiBiTA-SCOPE OF WORKf£\ \ a c` MUBILE ASSET EXTRACTION, � s? DECEMBER 2 2009 3k L % d � S � 2 .'.✓ f SK H th 1605 N 1.8 Street / Boise, ID �t3702 Phone 208-475 4908 ;_ xi Z georesults@Marshall com www marshallgis! com. x a T fl c TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 'I. TASK 10 MOBILE ASSET DATA COLLECTION AND INTEGRATION ....................................... 4 TASK 10.1 MOBILE DATA COLLECTION REVIEW................................................................................................. 4 TASK 10.2 MOBILE DATA COLLECTION.............................................................................................................. 4 TASK 10.3 ASSET DATA EXTRACTION................................................................................................................ 6 III. SCHEDULE AND BUDGET........................................................................................................... 9 Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Mapping i n pp g Addendum No 1 Mobile Asset Extraction I.x $INTRODUCTION I Y In September the City of Renton contacted Marshall to propose an addendum to the existing Phase I contract to add a mobile asset extraction task to Phase 1 to facilitate a comprehensive collection of utility data prior to the field data collection in Phase 2. The addendum adds a Video Asset Data Collection task and specifies that Data Transfer Services (DTS) of Orlando, FL be added as a subcontractor to accomplish this task. The purpose of the addendum is to use DTS collected data to augment the existing data in the City GIS and limit the amount of field work that may be required in the Phase II portion of the project. Additional tasks by DTS and Marshall are to tie the extracted asset data to data residing in the GIS and related asbuilts. DTS' Mobile Asset Collection (MAC) System will be employed to capture right-of-way video and mobile LiDAR point cloud data for use in asset extraction. This image database will be comprised of industry standard JPGs, collected at 2448 x 2048 pixel resolution (the highest resolution available for mobile platforms), with geo-referenced information being delivered via an ESRI geodatabase. The MAC vehicle is capable of traveling at posted roadway speeds without creating a hazard to other traffic utilizing the same facility. The MAC vehicle's mounted data collection system is focused on above -ground asset infrastructure. Equipment features on the vehicle include: ■ 2 High -Resolution (2448x2048) digital cameras — Grasshopper 5.0 megapixel ■ Applanix POS 220V Inertial Measuring Unit OMU) — Allows for centimeter -level positioning of the vehicle during data collection. ■ GPS Equipment - Used for precise positioning of the vehicle, heading information and positional tagging of images. ■ Laser Scanner — Used for automated detection of road assets and associated reflectivity. ■ Server — Used for the storing of data, processing of imagery, GPS and IMU data on -the -fly. Right -of -Way Cameras Global Positioning System (GPS) Inertial Navigation System (INS) Distance Measuring Instrument Marshall and Associates, Inc. 3 City of Renton December 2, 2009 RentonlAddendum No 1 DTS will utilize a street centerline dataset provided by the City to define the project area of interest. There are 354 (15 from eminent annexations) in the City of Renton. The project shall be comprised of the following tasks: • Mobile Data Collection Planning • Mobile Data Collection • Post -Processing • Asset Data Extraction (assets listed in table below) • GIS-Based Delivery The change order adds the following task and subtasks: ��5: �7ASK 10` MOBILE ASSET�I�ATA COLLECTION AND INTEGRATION} Task 10.1 Mobile Data Collection Review Marshall and DTS will work with the City, at the City's option, to develop a process that specifies and tests the integration of assets collected. Included in this will be the asset attributes that are available in the collected data set such as size and type of manhole cover, grate type and condition, ditch dimension and condition, etc. This task will include data specifications, quality control steps, and integration processes. It will also include criteria for matching collected data to existing GIS data and describe the process used to determine when to add new features, change the location of a feature, delete a feature and transfer attributes between features. This task will include review and comments of a sample DTS delivery, delivered by DTS early in the project. Task 10.2 Mobile Data Collection DTS will use their Mobile Asset Collection System to complete a street level video survey on every accessible street in the City. All visible above -ground assets in the right-of-way will be mapped. The van will collect a full menu of ROW assets and include the optional LIDAR survey. DTS' MAC vehicle will be employed to capture street -level images and mobile LiDAR point cloud data for use in asset extraction. This data collection process allows for the collection of asset data using geospatially referenced imagery in the field, from which positional and attribute information can be extracted in the office. The DTS team of operators and technicians will provide efficient and cost-effective data extraction in a GIS environment. The resulting geodatabase can be integrated by the City into their existing GIS Framework. Data will be acquired to cover the ROW to a maximum of 30ft outside the edge of pavement. This includes both the video and LiDAR coverage. Calibration runs will be performed at the beginning and end of each driving mission that will ensure the accuracy requirement is maintained throughout each data acquisition period. Data over these areas will be compared pre/post mission to compute the overall repeatability of the individual run(s). The MAC System is capable of utilizing Real -Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning technology. This technology is capable of providing centimeter -level positioning of the vehicle during the data collection process. The utilization of this technology will be particularly useful for this project because it provides an extra QA/QC step during the data collection process. The collected video is pre -positioned to centimeter - level accuracy before any post -processing is in place. This will allow our extraction team to begin work on the extraction of assets immediately after collection is completed for the day. There will not be any need for additional processing in the office, unless warranted by our internal QA/QC processes. Marshall and Associates, Inc. 4 City of Renton December 2, 2009 RentonlAddendum No I GPS Survey Check Point Control A total of 25 GPS photo -identifiable control points will be surveyed at strategic, predetermined locations within the project area. All control will be referenced to the City's control or other as specified by the City. These points will be utilized during the calibration and accuracy assessment processes to assure all aspects of the project specifications are met for the LiDAR, image, and subsequently processed vector data. DTS has minimized the number of control points to achieve a balance of cost and efficiency for the project. Our approach is to treat the entire ROW surface as a whole (uniform project) to perform accuracy calculations and save project cost while maintaining accuracy goals. Accuracy Assessment DTS will meet or exceed a 1:5ft accuracy for all features captured in the project ROW by utilizing a Trimble GPS receiver with OmniSTAR HP service, a high performance DGPS positioning service for land and air applications. The system typically provides a 2-sigma (95%) error of about 6 centimeters and a 99% error of less than 10 centimeters, which will exceed the 1.5ft accuracy specifications for this project. This approach eliminates the need for expensive multiple base stations, surveying, and keeps personnel safe from traffic hazards. Quality Assurance (Field) During LiDAR and image collection of the ROW, DTS will review all data for coverage, Ground Sample Distance (GSD), resolution, and quality. Both collection progress and data acceptance will be posted to our website to assure completeness of the data on a daily basis. Our mobile collection vehicle will not leave the project site until all data have been acquired and evaluated. Automated custom tools developed within the EarthviewTM software application suite will be utilized to evaluate the following: • LiDAR 100% coverage and quality • Imagery 100% coverage and quality Post -Processing of Raw Data Each day during data the collection phase, the MAC operator uploads the raw data to the DTS server for quality review. The data is checked for consistency and quality. Any areas that do not meet the QC standards will be recollected in subsequent days. This methodology ensures that the digital video logs meet the quality standards of the City and can be utilized for data extraction before de -mobilization. Once the right-of-way data is collected using the Trident 3D (T3D) CamCapture (KRONOS) data collection software, the DTS team will extract the photos at the specified interval (typically every 15 — 25 feet). T3D CC is used to control the acquisition of the photolog images and is not a required purchase for the City for this project. T31) CC is used by DTS to manage the image resolution, GPS data, Inertial Measuring Unit (IMU) data and trajectory data from the Mobile Asset Collection (MAC) vehicle. Data Calibration & OA Relative Calibration All LiDAR data will be calibrated first on a mission -by -mission basis by drive line then incorporated as a whole to generate a seamless project data set with a high degree of relative accuracy meeting the f1.5ft drive line — drive line accuracy. The method for assessing the drive line sidelap accuracy will be achieved by computing the error in overlap between each adjacent drive line. Particular attention will be paid to areas of greater slope where vertical aspect accentuates any areas of poor calibration. Absolute Accuracy Data will then be adjusted to the GPS survey data along the entire ROW (25 points) to achieve an average vertical accuracy of zero and tested against the survey control to meet the required <— 1.5ft accuracy @ 90% RMSE accuracy specifications. The method for computing the accuracy of the final calibrated data accuracy Marshall and Associates, Inc. 5 City of Renton December 2, 2009 RentonlAddendum No I will be comparison of the LiDAR TIN to the GPS control point at its horizontal point of intersection. It is expected that the horizontal accuracy will exceed the specification in most if not all cases. Task 10.3 Asset Data Extraction DTS will use their in-house staff and software to extract storm drainage assets from the entire collected data set. Attributes will be captured according to the Data Collection Plan. DTS analysts utilize T31) Analyst to extract data from the right-of-way images. The process involves the creation of ESRI Feature Classes for each asset type. The production process continues with the locating of assets in the georeferenced image using photogrammetric principles contained in the Trident Analyst software extraction. The resulting product will contain assets that are utilized in the GIS and used to conduct maintenance planning or life -cycle costing for the City. GIS-based Extraction and Population directly into GIS Database The DTS van is equipped with a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) system that captures a 3-dimensional view of the road right -of --way and automates the extraction of roadway sign assets. Onboard computers record spatially accurate coordinates (Latitude, Longitude, and Height) for each pulse of light, which can be used to identify the location and types of roadside features. This equipment also allows our team to efficiently process asset data using the automatic feature extraction algorithms in the Geo-3d software, allowing more time for QA/QC of the resulting data. Marshall and Associates, Inc. 6 City of Renton December2, 2009 Renton/Addendum No 1 %+_ �� MI Ta k. Automated Feature" —�"Extraction of Signs 4� i�.ih: R 3 Ar�4,.. y, �' "=+xis.• fit, �. 'rY' �"��: xi r S �m MQ r VN -� � F�`* -�' a� � � � ..+ >� � � °"' � .'�',� � �, ti� �' u�''�� "'"� �a ��'- r ._ � -✓ 4 s��*5`yv � _ h�ii�l1 i r "%ire b# r,..?`V:.S Visualization of Right -of -Way Data During Post -Processing Asset Data Dictionary The following represents the asset types that will be extracted from the data collection, as well as, the attributes for those assets. Storm Water Structures These assets include manhole covers and storm water inlets. If locking or non -locking lids can be identified during the data collection process then the "LockingLid" attribute will be populated. Otherwise the default will be "Unknown". 3Routetame'Dlgltallmage LldType r LvckmgLld r GrateElev .,, Notes ":c (TEXT) (TEXT) <swDomainLidType> <BooleanSymbolValue> (DOUBLE) (TEXT) SolidRound Yes SolidRectongle No GrateVanedDirectional Unknown (DEFAULT) GrateVanedBiDirectional GrateHerring bone GrateVaned Parallel GrateRolledCurb GrateThruCurbVanedDirectional GrateThruCurbVanedBlDirectional GrateThruCurbOther GrateSmallNonStandard Birdcage Other Unknown Marshall and Associates, Inc. 7 City of Renton December 2, 2009 RentonlAddendum No I Storm Water Conveyance These assets include ditches and culverts. Because culverts are underground features DTS will only identify and attribute culvert ends that can clearly seen in the imagery. (TEXT) (DOUBLE) (TEXT) <swDomainConveyance> <swDomainNKlassNumber> <swDomDitchCoverage> Ditch Circular Vegetated Culvert Rectangular Gravel Other Arch Dirt (Natural) Arbitrary Channel (V-Shaped) (Natural) Arbitrary Channel (Flat - Bottom) Storm water conveyance attribute table continued: UpperinVertEle'vz >�.$'aa ^j _ .,.�,. F towerinvertEleV i -. b. .1�'. .. -y . )f'i .F�i'...,��Y .. �.. nY� -. AhatenalT er �, YP r? W.. P.. 3 Fi9si ¢ o �_ uY .. / Notes '%', dY14 .�. .+ h S (DOUBLE) (DOUBLE) <swDomainPipeMaterial> (TEXT) concrete corrugated metal unknown (DEFAULT) Storm Water End Fittings These are attributes associated with ditch end points. (TEXT) (DOUBLE) I (TEXT) <swDomainEndsFittings> <swEndPtType> (TEXT) FlowEnters Open FlowExits DebrisBarrier Unknown RipRapPod Other GIS-Based Data Delive This image database will be comprised of industry standard AVIs, collected at 2448 x 2048 pixel resolution and 15 frames per second (FPS). Images extracted at specific distance intervals for assets data extraction will be delivered in JPEG format with associated GPS locations. Assets extracted will be delivered via an ESRI Geodatabase that uses the same attribute names as the names in the final geodatabase. Marshall and Associates Inc. 8 City of Renton December 2, 2009 Renton/Addendum No I III. SCHEDULE AND BUDGET The schedule for this project addendum, though dependent on weather for the production collection phase, is shown highlighted below (Task 10.1—10.3). The mobile data collection task will take 3 weeks of effort, but we are estimating 2 months due to winter weather effects on the collection. Marshall and Associates, Inc. 9 City of Renton December 2, 2009 Renton/Addendum No I The budget for this addendum is shown below. r1- Addendum N0� Geodatabase Pro)ect Business GIS Project Estimated .. g Manager Analyst Analyst Support DTS DTS Expenses Total r $110.- ' R , . ."'Team, . xCoordinator,, ask .1O Mobile Data°Collect Review ;. 24 16 `:. ... .:; .:2 8:' 0 ., $ll ,,. , $100... ... $7;240 : :Task 10:2 Mobile Data Collection 1 � ° n 4 , O :x ` D 3 `: $42;240 ,` .. $13;2U0 $0 $55,t315', Subtask 10.2.1 Project Mobilization $3,300 $5,200 $8,500 Subtask 10.2.2 Mobile Data Collection $27,258 $4,000 $31,258 Subtask 10.2.3 Post -Processing of Data 1 3 $11,682 $4,000 $16,057 ;:Task 103.Asset";Dafa` Extractions _ 0 O x-: r, ' �$ 0 0 ' $56,463` ' $0 `, $0 R,, Subtask 10.3.1 Stormwater Structure $35,046 $35,046 Subtask 10.3.2 Stormwater .-Conveyance $21,417 $21,417 777 $13;200 1,00 119 518' Notes: 1. Mileage expenses are $0.55 per mile. Marshall and Associates, Inc. 10 City of Renton December 2, 2009 Renton/Addendum No I CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems/Surface Water December 14, 2009 Staff Contact...... Ron Straka, x7248 Agenda Status Steve Lee, x7205 Consent .............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Correspondence.. Water System Improvement Project Engineering Ordinance ............. Consultant Agreement with Gray and Osborne, Inc. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Consultant Agreement Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance D.ept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $115,775 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $1,300,000 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $1,300,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project includes installation of a new storm system, waterline extension, curb and gutter, and sidewalk along Lake Washington Blvd. North, next to the proposed Hawk's Landing development. This project will spur development activities in this area that has for decades been used as industrial land and warehouse space. The storm system improvements include provisions for water quality treatment that fronts Hawks Landing and extends the storm trunk line from the WSDOT storm pipe to the existing downstream culvert near the May Creek Bridge. The curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements will extend south of the Hawk's Landing southern entrance and connect to the existing May Creek Bridge sidewalk. The waterline extension includes installation of approximately 1300 feet of waterline on Lake Washington Blvd. North from North 401h Street to NE 44th Street. These improvements are funded with $1,700,000 from the Washington State Public Works Board 2009-2011 Capital Budget Direct Appropriation Projects. Any cost savings from the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project and the remainder of the $1,700,000 in funding will be used to extend the May Creek Trail east from Lake Washington. Additional funding for this project was approved in the 2010 Surface Water Utility Capital Budget for $100,000 (Account 427/U65470). Gray and Osborne, Inc. was selected from the approved 2009-2010 Utility Systems Annual Consultant Roster. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Gray and Osborne, Inc., in the amount of $115,775, for the design, permitting, and preparation of construction plans and specifications for the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091202-2009-GOAgenda Bill.doc\STL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT p5(tCity of ��0� . M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 4, 2009 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: .f'�1 Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Gregg ZimmermarY, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248) Steve Lee, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7205) SUBJECT: Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project Engineering Consultant Agreement with Gray and Osborne, Inc. ISSUE: Should City Council approve the Engineering Consultant Agreement to implement the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement project with Gray and Osborne, Inc., in the amount of $115,775? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Gray and Osborne, Inc., in the amount of $115,775, to assist with the implementation of the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project is to install a new storm system, waterline extension, curb, gutter, and sidewalk along Lake Washington Blvd. North to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of the 1-405 Exit 7 area. Installation of this project is intended to spur development activities in this area that has for decades been used as industrial land and warehouse space. Most recently it has been the site of Pan Abode Cedar Homes that departed due to development interest by Hawk's Landing to convert the 7.8 acre site into a development to include a hotel, office space, and retail shops. The proposed curb and gutter improvements will extend on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. North from 600 feet south of the intersection with Seahawks Way and continue south to the existing May Creek Bridge sidewalk. The stormwater system improvements include collecting Lake Washington Blvd. North roadway and sidewalk runoff and treating the stormwater prior to discharging into a new stormwater trunk pipe that will also convey upstream flows from existing WSDOT areas and the Hawk's Landing development. The stormwater trunk line will connect from the existing Mr. Corman, Council President December 4, 2009 Page 2 of 2 WSDOT manhole and extend south to the existing culvert north of the May Creek Bridge. The storm system improvements will include providing water quality treatment prior to discharging into May Creek. The waterline extension includes installation of approximately 1300 feet of 12-inch waterline within Lake Washington Blvd. North from North 40th Street to NE 44th Street. A portion of the waterline will be installed inside an existing 18-inch steel casing under May Creek Bridge. The water system improvements will be designed to serve existing and future development in the area and will improve fire flow and water system redundancy. This consultant agreement will provide the necessary engineering, planning, and environmental work necessary to construct storm and water improvements including a JARPA submittal for WDFW Hydraulic Permit application, ESA review (if necessary), and SEPA application. In addition, surveying of project limits for water and storm improvement limits are included within the scope of work. This consultant agreement also includes geo-technical and civil engineering design with an alternatives study. Deliverables will include 35%, 60%, 90% and final plan and specification submittals to support construction bidding. Expected project challenges to the improvements include relocating power and telecommunication lines prior to constructing the storm and water system improvements. In addition, the design plans and specifications will be developed in coordination with the Hawk's Landing development construction schedule. The project engineering consultant contract budget for the water and storm improvement is $115,775 which is funded by the Washington State Public Works Board for the 2009-2011 Capital Budget Direct Appropriation of $1,700,000 (letter attached) and the approved 2010 Surface Water Utility capital budget for this project. $1,200,000 of the $1,700,000 appropriated from the state capital budget is allocated toward the storm and water improvements along Lake Washington Blvd. North. Any cost savings from the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project and the remainder of the $1,700,000 in funding will be used to extend the May Creek Trail east from Lake Washington. Gray and Osborne, Inc. was selected from the approved 2009-2010 Utility Systems Annual Consultant Roster. CONCLUSION: The Surface Water and Water utilities recommend the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Gray and Osborne, Inc., in the amount of $115,775, for the design, permitting, and preparation of construction plans and specifications for the Lake Washington Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project. Attachment cc: Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Terry Higashlyama, CSAdminiistrator Peter Hahn, PW Deputy Administrator — Transportation Lys Hornsby, utility Systems Director Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director Chip Vincent, Planning Director Leslie Betlach, Parks and Natural Resources Director Abdoul Gafour, Water System Engineering Supervisor File H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091116—GO—Issue—Paper-2009.doc\STLtp Washington State Public Works Board 906 Columbia Street SW Post Office Box 48319 Olympia, Washington 98504-8319 June 23, 2009 Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Re: 2009-2011 Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation Projects Renton Hawks Landing Project Dear Ms. Dale Estey: Congratulations on being awarded a state grant in the 2009-2011 Capital Budget! The Public Works Board (the Board) has been assigned to administer your grant funds. Your project has received a direct appropriation, which means that the funds were included in the budget at the request of the Governor or Legislature. Now that the Governor signed the Capital Budget into law, our role is to release these funds in a way that meets the intent of the Legislature and conforms with state regulations. We strive to do so expeditiously and will make the process as simple as possible for you. Before you can receive grant funds, a contract will need to be executed between your organization and the Board. In order to get the contracting process started, please follow these steps: Complete the attached Contract Readiness Survey and have the person who is authorized to sign contracts sign the Grantee Certification page; 2. Attach documentation for committed funds (copies of award letters, council appropriations, etc.), if applicable; 3. Complete the attached LEED Certification Declaration and have both your architect (if applicable) and the person who is authorized to sign contracts sign the Certification on the last page; 4. Attach a copy of the project request form/packet that you submitted to legislature; 5. Attach a completed W-9 form (download form at www.irs.jzov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf); Administrative services provided by Washington State Department of Commerce (360) 725-3150 Fax (360) 664-3029 www.pwb.wa.gov Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director City of Renton June 23, 2009 Page 2 6. Compile all these documents and mail them to: Corina Grigoras Public Works Board PO Box 48319 Olympia, WA 98504-8319 It is important to note that this is a cost reimbursement grant, which means that funds will be disbursed after costs associated with your scope of work have been incurred. The contract will provide retroactive financing for eligible project costs starting from the date the 2009-2011 Capital Budget was enacted, May 15, 2009. Once we receive your complete set of documents, we will prepare your contract. We may contact you for further information. We expect that our contract preparation process should take.no more than three weeks from the time that all of the requirements have been met. Again, we offer you our congratulations on receiving a state capital grant and look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (360) 725-3160 or email me at Corina.Grigoras@pwb.wa.gov. Sincerely, )�f Corina Grigoras Public Works Board Grant Programs, Direct -Appropriation Projects cc. Senator Margarita Prentice ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this , day of , by and between the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY," and Gray & Osborne, Inc. whose address is 701 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98109 , at which work will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME: Lake Washington Blvd Hawks Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project (SWP 27-3531) WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project, and WHEREAS, the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below, the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies. The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement. The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City. II DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following: HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice IPiazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA), "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton Standard Specification. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual." 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual, Volumes 1 and 2." 6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic analysis as described in item 14. 7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual." U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be used as they pertain. 13. Metro Transit, design criteria. 14. King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3, 4, and 5. 15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." III ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work. All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with other'available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed, the Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated to perform any such field studies. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (C1P)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\ msoffice 2Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E 1-2009 IV OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing -arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible. V TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, the Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval.. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 3Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 VI PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or hours) and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed $ 115,775 without a written amendment to this contract, agreed to and signed by both parties. Cost Plus Net Fee Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost includes direct salary cost, overhead, and direct non -salary cost. The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 171 percent of the direct salary cost and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of the contract. The direct non -salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to travel, reproduction, telephone, supplies, and fees of outside consultants. The direct non -salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non -salary costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount. 4. The net fee, which represents the Consultants profit shall be 15 percent of direct salary plus overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant, the supplemental agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by detailed statements, for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance, by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or claimed to be due. Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK"). A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 4Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts } E1-2009 To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employee interviews. Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with respect to such claims. The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing upon, these records. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment. VII CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional compensation. Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof revised, the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII. VIII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. IX EMPLOYMENT The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 5Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work, the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. X NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non -Discrimination provision, this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. XI TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with subparagraphs C and D below. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the Consultant, with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract. doe\msoffice 6Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition, the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid. D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant, the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination, the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, the original copies of all Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/ Building/Public Works or his/her successors and delegees, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this Agreement. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in King County. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 7Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees except as limited below. The Consultant shall secure general liability, property damage, auto liability, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1.0 million, with a General Aggregate in the amount of $2.0 million, unless waived or reduced by the City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form, and the Standard Acord Certification Fonn prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton will be named as Additional Insured(s) on (CONTRACTOR'S) policy, with that coverage being primary and non-contributory with any other policy(ies) available to the City. A copy of the endorsement shall be provided to the City. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City. The City will nonnally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty five days' written notice shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required. The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the Consultant's waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. X1V SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 8Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 XV ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070. XVI COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for, any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. XVII EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON Signature Date Mayor type or print name ATTEST: Title Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Date HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contiact\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 9Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD HAWKS LANDING STORM AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — SWP-27-3531 PURPOSE The purpose of the project is to install curb/gutter and portions of a sidewalk, a new storm system, and a waterline extension within Lake Washington Boulevard North to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of I-405 Exit 7 area, including the Hawks Landing development. The curb and gutter will extend on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North from Ripley Lane North approximately 600 feet south; and curb, gutter and sidewalk will continue south on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North to connect to an existing bridge over May Creek. The stormwater system will collect road, curb, gutter, and sidewalk runoff and provide water quality treatment for half of the existing road prior to discharge to an existing stormwater system and ultimately to May Creek. The new storm system will be approximately 900 lineal feet of trunk and catch basin collection and treatment system in an underground system capable of carrying traffic loading. The waterline extension consists of the installation of about 1,300 feet of 12-inch waterline in Lake Washington Boulevard North from North 40`h Street to NE 44`h Street, and a portion of the waterline will be installed inside an existing 18-inch steel casing within the May Creek Bridge. Construction of the project must be completed by the summer of 2010 with the City planning to advertise for bids in March 2010. The Consultant will perform the tasks and work needed to design the project, and develop the plans and specifications for project bidding and construction. The project tasks may include surveying, geotechnical investigation, utility potholing, hydrologic/hydraulic analysis, permit assistance, preliminary design, final design plans and specifications, and construction assistance and observation. DESIGN CRITERIA The City will determine the basic premises and criteria for the design. Reports and plans shall be developed in accordance with the latest adopted or approved edition of the following: 1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA), Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction 2008 edition. 2. City of Renton — Latest revisions of Standard Plans for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, and Supplemental Specifications. (October 28, 2009) Page 1 of 9 3. King County Surface Water Design Manual (2009) as amended by the City of Renton (2010, Draft available by Fall 2009). 4. City of Renton Survey Control Network (May 2000) and Surveying Standards (1997). City of Renton Drafting Standards for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction 2004. Autocad Drawings shall be in Autodesk Map 2009 (preferred), or Autocad 2005 and up. Drawing contours, elevations, and dimensions shall be in English units. All surveying shall be tied into the City's Survey Control Network. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK Task 1— Surveying, Base Map Perform a site survey to identify and map the surface features and existing utilities in the project area (see attached figure). The City topographic map and Autocad drawings provided by adjacent developers may be used for the initial base map. The survey will be used to update, supplement, clarify, correct, and add the details needed for design and construction to the City base map. The surveying work will include the following: a. Contours, spot elevations, and surface features in the potential project area. The existing developer topographic survey for Lake Washington Boulevard (as prepared by the Hawks Landing development surveyor) will be confirmed adequate by the Consultant's surveyor(s) with spot elevations, checks of adequate point cloud coverage along the centerline and 10-feet past each side of the right-of-way boundaries and with additional surface feature surveying provided including water all water connection and topographic features to the proposed south connection (horizontal and vertical). b. Locating pavement, curb and, gutter, sidewalks, structures, bridge, and other private utilities driveways, landscaping, vaults, building footprints, street lights, power poles, large trees (over 8") and other surface features within the project area. C. Existing City utilities such as water, sewer and storm systems including: Water valve rim and nut elevations, water meter locations, hydrants, water vault locations. Sewer and storm manhole and catch basin rim elevations, pipe sizes and invert elevations of all pipes in manholes and catch basins. d. The existing stormwater drainage system will be surveyed for the hydraulic analysis and design and will incorporate any previously surveyed information. The survey will include the following features: (1) The 24-inch outfall from I-405 within WSDOT right-of-way. (2) The ditch, inverts, pipe size and material for the existing stormwater system between the WSDOT outfall and May Creek channel banks south of the project. (October 28, 2009) Page 2 of 9 (3) Several cross -sections of May Creek east of Lake Washington Boulevard if information from the Barbee Mill cross sections for May Creek are found to be inadequate. (4) Other catch basin and pipes that connect or may connect to the project storm system. f. Private Utility locations including, but not limited to, natural gas, electrical power, telecommunications (telephone, fiber optic, cable system, etc.), METRO sewer, and others within the project area. Information shall be obtained from visible surface locations, existing site plans, utility location markings through Gray & Osborne's request to the one -call utility locate, and information gathered by the surveyor from the private utilities companies. Any existing fiber optic locations shall show its vertical elevation and any bends determined both horizontally and vertically. (Note: The vertical depth of fiber optic line(s) may be determined by lifting the Qwest manhole and determining the depth.) g. Identify right-of-way centerline and stationing lines for project design and construction. Stationing lines will be marked and easily located so the construction contractor's surveyor can re-establish them. The location of the ROW centerline may need to be established by the surveyor from City benchmarks and plat maps. A second stationing line will be established later, when. the location of the new system is finalized. h. Surveying for site investigations such as soil borings, test pits, and utility potholing. Property right-of-way line to be provided by the surveyor, including WSDOT limited access right-of-way easement information and linework. Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines, and specifications including, but not limited to, the following: Draft GeoSpatial Positioning Accuracy Standards for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure by the Federal Geographic Data Subcommittee, December 1996. All pertinent Washington State legislation, e.g., Chapter 58 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). 3. All pertinent sections of the Washington State Administrative Code (WAC), e.g., Chapters 332 WAC. DELIVERABLES Surveyed base map meeting the requirements of the 2004 City of Renton Drafting Standards. The City layering system will be used. The Surveyor shall provide a draft paper copy (24" x 36") and electronic file (AutoDesk Map 2009, or other approved version) of the base map survey for review and comment by the City. After approval, a final paper copy at 1 "=20' scale and an electronic copy will be provided. The paper copy will be stamped and signed by a Surveyor (PLS) registered in the State of Washington. (October 28, 2009) Page 3 of 9 Task 2 — Geo-technical Investigation The geotechnical scope of work is listed by tasks as determined by predesign recommendations and field investigations. Depending on the presumed presence of concrete panels in the road section and water quality and detention facility selection within the alternatives portion of work (after 35 percent design submittal) by Gray & Osborne, the geotechnical tasks listed below may or may not be required. Gray & Osborne will submit invoices only for actual work completed. a. Investigate and review existing regional and local geologic information, reports, and studies relevant to the project design. The project may be located in an area with poor sub -surface soils. b. Perform onsite geologic investigations to identify subsurface conditions that may affect project design and construction. The investigations will include two test pits or borings to depths of 35 feet maximum if a vault is proposed for treatment, standard penetration tests; soil samples, and soil analysis. It is assumed by Gray & Osborne that there exists a minimum of 8-inch concrete panels within the roadway and all City standards shall be followed for patching. The consultant shall provide all necessary equipment and operators for the geotechnical investigation. Ground elevation will be surveyed at boring locations and coordinated with the surveyor/civil designer. All surfaces shall be restored following geotechnical investigations. Permanent pavement shall be restored when geo-technical investigations disturb existing paved areas. C. Geotechnical Report. The results of the Geotechnical Investigation will be provided in a bound report. The Consultant will submit an unbound draft copy for City review and comments. The Geotechnical Report will include the following: (1) A summary of the regional geologic information. (2) A description of the onsite geologic investigation, equipment, methods, and testing performed. (3) Site specific geologic information such as site map, boring locations, boring logs, water elevations, soil samples, and soil analysis results. (4) Analysis of the geologic information and recommendations for project construction. (5) Recommendations for dewatering, soil stability, shoring, bearing strength, trench excavation, concrete panel patching and/or replacement, potential need for pipe foundation and support depending on material proposed by the civil designer, pipe bedding, and trench backfill. The Geotechnical Report will be available to bidders with all of the Geotechnical Report included in the project bid document. (October 28, 2009) Page 4 of 9 d. The Consultant will provide two bound copies of the final Geotechnical Report and one unbound copy. The Consultant will provide an electronic copy (MS Word) of the final report, all graphs and tables, and any other information contained in the final report. Task 3 — Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis and Report Review existing hydrologic information that will impact the storm system design and perform hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to design the new storm system. The City's goal is for the new storm system to convey the future conditions peak flow from the 25-year, 24-hour storm without overflowing into the Hawks Landing development or other upstream facilities, and to convey the peak flow from the 100-year, 24-hour storm with any overflow contained within the local flood plain. May Creek is located in a FEMA Flood Map Flood Hazard Zone, so it may not be possible to completely meet the project goal for the 100-year storm. The hydrologic and hydraulic work will include the following: a. Review existing and future hydrology for the project area including upstream contributory flows from an assumed future WSDOT contributing area for the main stormwater trunk -line and future development flows from the full build out for Hawks Landing. Review existing hydrologic reports for the area, and develop a King County KCRTS hydrologic model for existing and future flow conditions that will be used for hydraulic modeling. Peak flows for existing and future conditions for the 6-month, 2-, 10-, 25- and 100-year storm will be developed. Hawks Landing is located within the May Creek drainage basin. The modeling work will use basin information from any existing report(s) as the basis to begin development of a hydrologic model. b. Provide detention facility analyses (if required) due to increases in impervious areas that complies with Renton flow control standards. Develop detention facility alternatives (if needed) and design plans. Flow control analysis and design shall meet the KCSWDM 2009 standards as amended by the City. (The scope of work for this project is within the May Creek drainage basin.) c. Provide water quality facility analyses with the assumption that half street improvements for the full build -out of Lake Washington Boulevard is needed to accommodate all phases of the Hawks Landing development project. This assumption includes a new turn lane into the development, 10-feet sidewalks, and 12-feet landscape area fronting Hawks Landing. Water quality treatment analysis and design shall meet the KCSWDM 2009 standards as amended by the City. d. Develop a hydraulic model for the proposed drainage system using XP-SWMM. The model will provide the flow and backwater results for the existing drainage system for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storm events for existing basin conditions, and for the proposed drainage system for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storm events for existing and future basin conditions. Rim elevations in the Hawks Landing development will need to be checked for potential of surcharging as part of this analysis. At a minimum, hydraulic modeling will be performed from the I-405 WSDOT outfall culverts at the southwest corner of the Exit 7 right-of-way. This scope assumes existing hydrologic/hydraulic analysis completed for the May Creek basin can be used for the downstream backwater boundary conditions from the Barbee Mill development recently (October 28, 2009) Page 5 of 9 constructed. The Barbee Mill reports include a Hec-Ras analysis for May Creek with updated floodplain modeling, flows, and cross sections. (Note: Any additional modeling for the system upstream of the I-405 Exit 7 interchange shall be considered additional work.) Gray & Osborne shall analyze and meet the City's stormwater policy to meet compensatory storage requirements for the project. Gray & Osborne shall determine compensatory storage requirements for filling of floodplain with a zero rise analysis needed if filling is proposed as an alternative in the design. f. A draft Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report for the project describing the modeling performed and the results will be submitted during the first portion of the project design. The draft report will be used to evaluate the existing conditions, and help evaluate and select the new stormwater system design. g. A Final Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report for the project will be submitted during the second half of the project design. The Final Report will include the existing conditions analysis and the analysis for the new stormwater system design. The Final Report will contain the analysis, methodology, figures, graphs, tables, and computer program results (in the Appendix). The consultant will provide a draft report for City review and comment before finalizing the report. The Final Report will be signed and stamped by a PE licensed in the State of Washington. h. The Consultant will provide one bound copy of the final Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report and one unbound copy. The Consultant will provide an electronic copy (MS Word 2007) of the final report, all graphs and tables, and electronic versions of any other information contained in the Final Report. The Consultant will provide an electronic copy of all computer modeling files used in the analysis including input and output files. Task 4 — Permit Assistance Permitting is expected to occur early in the first half of the project. The permitting work will include the following: a. Determine what States and Federal Permits (if any) may be needed for the project. b. A Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application (JARPA) shall be prepared and submitted for an HPA from WDFW. Existing reports indicate no wetlands within the storm and water line project area. The Consultant will determine if a Corps permit is likely to be required for work within the storm drainage ditch and submit appropriate federal permit if deemed to be needed. This scope does not include a wetland delineation or biological evaluation. A wetland report was prepared by Graham -Bunting Associates of the area in the immediate vicinity of the project and is assumed to provide the necessary information for design and permit review. A site visit and review of the existing report to determine if the Corps is likely to assert jurisdiction is included in the task. If a wetland delineation and/or biological evaluation is required, it will be considered additional work. C. Provide assistance to the City by preparing drafts of local, State, or Federal permit applications as needed. Provide expert analysis and figures/information as needed for the permits. All permit applications will be reviewed and submitted by the City. (October 28, 2009) Page 6 of 9 b. The consultant will attend a pre -construction conference with the City and the winning bidder. The City will issue the Notice to Proceed when all City requirements have been met and material submittals have been approved. C. The consultant will review material submittals by the bidder in conjunction with the City. During construction the City may ask the consultant to evaluate technical questions, provide additional information or clarifications to the design plans, and prepare Change Orders for any changes needed to the plans or specifications. d. The City will provide a part-time construction inspector for daily inspection of the project. The consultant will perform occasional inspections as needed to monitor overall project progress and adherence to the project design. Inspections will include checking actual soil and groundwater conditions with the Geotechnical investigations results and recommendations. Approximately six site visits (one per week during construction period) are included. A memo documenting each inspection, items and conditions observed, and any recommendations will be sent to the City after each inspection. An Addendum to the Engineering Agreement will be negotiated if conditions requiring special engineering and inspection are encountered, such as poor sub -surface soils, additional soil inspections and testing, unusual dewatering requirements, pile caps or special pipe supports, structural rebar inspection and concrete pours. The City will processes simple Change Orders and procedural changes, construction project records (e.g., work days, inspector logs), progress estimates for bid items, and pay - 1 estimates. 1J As -built surveying will be performed by the Construction Contractor as part of the Construction Survey bid item and are not included as part of Gray & Osborne's Design/Construction Assistance work. The City will review the as -built survey information and update the design drawings with the as -built information. Task 7 — Project Management Project Management will include internal management and procedures needed by the Consultant for the project. PM includes personnel management, internal meetings, record keeping, monitoring the design progress and schedule, and the contract billing. Design review meetings with the City are included in the design task with which they are associated. (October 28, 2009) Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD HAWKS LANDING STORM AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — SWP-27-3531 Task Estimated Start Estimated Completion Notice to Proceed 12/16/2009 NA Task 1 - Surveying, Base Map 12/16/2009 12/31/2009 Task 2 — Geo-technical Investigation 12/16/2009 1/12/2010 Task 3 - Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis and Report 12/16/2009 1/15/2010 Task 4 - Permit Assistance 1/4/2009 3/15/2010 Task 5 - Storm and Water System Design, Utility Relocation, Construction Plans and Specifications 1/4/2009 4/16/2010 35% Design Submittal 1/4/2009 2/26/2010 60% Design Submittal 3/8/2010 3/19/2010 90% Design Submittal 3/24/2010 4/13/2010 Task 6 - Construction Assistance and Observation 6/7/2010 9/15/2010 Task 7 — Project Management 12/16/2009 10/31/2010 CADocuments and SettingsWee\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\2YH003TG\Renton Lk WA Schedule_2009-12-03.doc Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "C" ENGINEERING SERVICES SCOPE AND ESTIMATED COST Lake Washington Boulevard - Hawks Landing Storm and Water Improvements Tasks Principal Hours Project Mgr. Hours Project Eng. Hours Electrical Eng. Hours Senior Environmental Specialist Hours Lead CADD Technician Hours GIS Tech. Hours PLS Hours Survey Tech. Hours Survey Crew Hours Surveying and Base Map Preparation 8 40 16 16 40 Geotechnical Investigation 2 4 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling 4 40 120 8 - Permit Assistance 4 12 50 Electrical Utility Relocate 4 40 Stormwater Design 4 20 60 40 Water System Design 4 20 40 40 Construction Assistance and Observation 12 60 Project Man aement 12 24 QA/QC 2 4 8 2 Hour Estimate: Estimated Hourly Rates: Direct Labor Cost 32 $56 $1,792 148 $46 $6,808 288 $38 $10,944 42 $50 $2,100 50 $38 $1,900 120 $33 $3,960 8 $23 $184 16 $42 $672 16 $30 $480 40 $75 $3,000 Subtotal Direct Labor: $ 31,840 Indirect Costs (171%): $ 54,446 Total Labor Cost: $ 86,286 Fee (15%): $ 12,943 Subtotal Labor & Fees: $ 99,229 Direct Non -Salary Cost: Mileage & Expenses (Mileage @ $0.55/mile) $ 251 Printing $ 125 Subconsultant: Utility Locates - APS $ 2,750 Geotechnical - S&EE, Inc. $ 8,750 Wetland Report $ 3,200 Subconsultant Overhead (10%) $ 1,470 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 115,775 (October 28, 2009) Page 1 of 1 LIMITS OF PROJECT € ET N 0 500 Feet CITY OF RENTON LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD STORM & WATER IMPROVEMENTS CONSULTING ENGINEERS M:\RENTON\20096.27 Lk Washing Blvd Stor Water Improvements\GISVooation.=- RESOLUTION NO. 3229 CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3229 It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to race, color, national origin, ethnic background, gender, marital status, religion, age or disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines: (1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job -related criteria which does not discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources decisions will be in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing civil service rules, and labor contract agreements. (2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair practices and equal opportunity in employment. (3) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN - The City of Renton Affinnative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program will be maintained and administered to facilitate equitable representation with the City work force and to assure equal employment opportunity to all. It shall be the responsibility of elected officials, the Mayor, the Affirmative Action Officer, department administrators, managers, supervisors, Contract Compliance Officers and all employees to cant' out the policies, guidelines and corrective measures set forth in the Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. (4) CONTRACTORS' OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub -contractors, consultants and suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fair Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and in the City's Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities. CONCURRED IN by the City Council of the City of RENTON, Washington, this 7thday of October, 1996. CITY OF RENTON: fv(ayor ,Attest: City Clerl RENTON CITY COUNCIL: Council President HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Contract\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice IIPiazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 Y 1VT O� AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE hereby confirms and declares that ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) I. It is policy to offer equal ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) H. opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to the race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or veteran status. complies with all applicable (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant) federal, state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment. III. When applicable, will seek out and (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant) negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts. Print Agent/Representative's Name Print Agent/Representative's Title Agent/Representative's Signature Date Signed Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier. Include or attach this document(s) with the contract. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1010 Corres Consult Conti-act\091027-2009Conslt-GO-CityContract.doc\msoffice 12Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON AND REFERRED TO AS THE FAIRWOOD ANNEXATION; STATING THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS RESIDING THEREIN AS NEARLY AS MAY BE; CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON AUGUST 17, 2010, TO SUBMIT TO VOTERS OF THE TERRITORY THE PROPOSAL FOR ANNEXATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENTION AS WELL AS TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF KING COUNTY AND THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, AND TO TAKE THOSE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO PLACE PROPOSITION 1 BEFORE THE VOTERS, INCLUDING THE PREPARATION OF INFORMATION FOR THE VOTER'S PAMPHLET. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has, within its Potential Annexation Area, unincorporated territory commonly referred to as the Fairwood Annexation Area, consisting of approximately 4,479 acres, which area is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City was presented a 60% petition to annex an area known as the Red Mill Annexation Area, but the petition was held in abeyance because of the pending incorporation vote for the City of Fairwood; and WHEREAS, the City was presented with a 10% petition to annex an area known as the Greater Fairwood Communities Annexation Area and passed Resolution 3991 calling for annexation by the election method, but the petition was also held in abeyance because of the pending incorporation vote for the City of Fairwood; and WHEREAS, the incorporation vote failed; and WHEREAS, resubmitting the petitions to present a consolidated annexation proposal could be confusing and time-consuming; and lid RESOLUTION NO. J WHEREAS, the City of Renton has consistently stated that the future governance of the Fairwood area should be the choice of residents, with accurate information to make an informed decision; and WHEREAS, the state has created a sales tax credit funding mechanism for, annexations of over 10,000 population to aid cities, such as Renton, with the expenses of annexing areas within their potential annexation areas; and WHEREAS, the sales tax credit mechanism, which assists the cities in covering the costs of new annexations will expire, according to its terms, for annexations not commenced before January 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, it will be financially infeasible for the City to annex the Fairwood area or any other large area without financial assistance from the state sales tax credit, or another mechanism; and WHEREAS, there is little time for the City to commence annexation of the Fairwood area before the expiration of the sales tax credit; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to initiate annexations via election pursuant to RCW 35A.14.015; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property within Renton's established Potential Annexation Area generally bounded by SE 162"d Place on the north, 1281h Avenue SE on the west, SE 192"d Street on the south, and extending to east to the King County Urban Growth Boundary as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and 6 Y RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to call for an election for this annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is14,189. SECTION Ill. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held on August 17, 2010, pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW, to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. SECTION IV. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION V. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington and with the King County Boundary Review Board. SECTION VI. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. SECTION VII. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place Proposition 1 before the voters in the August 17, 2010, election, for the Fairwood Annexation. SECTION Vlll. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition 1. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to King County Division of Records and Elections: 3 RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSITION 1 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON The Renton City Council received a petition to annex property to the City of Renton and passed a resolution calling for an election on the question. This measure would authorize annexation of that property, generally referred to as the Fairwood Annexation Area, to the City of Renton. Shall that area in unincorporated King County known as the Fairwood Annexation Area, as legally described in the above -mentioned resolution, be annexed to the City of Renton? 0 For Annexation 0 Against Annexation SECTION IX. The Mayor is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 1 in the voter's pamphlet for the August 17, 2010 election. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1353:11/10/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 2009. 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SMALL PUBLIC WORKS ROSTER PROCESS TO SOLICIT PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT BIDS FOR CONTRACTS ESTIMATED TO COST LESS THAN THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000) AND A LIMITED PUBLIC WORKS PROCESS FOR BIDS ESTIMATED TO COST LESS THAN THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($35,000). WHEREAS, RCW 39.04.155 and other laws regarding contracting for public works by municipalities, allow certain contracts to be awarded by a small works roster process; and WHEREAS, in order to be able to implement small works roster processes, the City is required by law to adopt legislation establishing specific procedures; and WHEREAS, the City has an Interlocal Agreement with eCityGov Alliance (hereinafter "eCity") that allows the City to use the Small Works Roster established by eCity; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The use of a Small Public Works Roster is hereby authorized, using the following process: A. Small Public Works Roster. The following small works roster procedures are established for use by the City pursuant to RCW 39.04.155: 1. Eligible Project Cost Threshold. The City need not comply with formal sealed bidding procedures for the construction, building, renovation, remodeling, alteration, repair, or improvement of real property where the estimated cost does not exceed three hundred 1 RESOLUTION NO. thousand dollars ($300,000), which includes the costs of labor, material, equipment and sales and/or use taxes as applicable. Instead, the City may use the Small Public Works Roster procedures. The breaking of any project into units or accomplishing any projects by phases is prohibited if it is done for the purpose of avoiding the maximum dollar amount of a contract that may be let using the small works roster process. 2. Publication. At least once a year the City, or eCity on behalf of the City, shall publish in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction a notice of the existence of the roster or rosters and solicit the names of contractors for such roster or rosters. Responsible contractors shall be added to appropriate City or eCity Roster(s) at any time that they submit a written request and necessary records. 3. Quotations. The City shall obtain electronic and/or written quotations for public works contracts from contractors on the appropriate small works roster to assure that a competitive price is established and to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder who meets the mandatory bidder responsibility criteria in RCW 39.04.350(1) and the supplementary bidder criteria under RCW 39.04.350(2), if any are established. a. A contract awarded from a small works roster need not be advertised. b. Invitations for quotations shall include an estimate of the scope and nature of the work to be performed as well as materials and equipment to be furnished. However, detailed plans and specifications need not be included in the invitation. c. Quotations may be invited from all appropriate contractors on the appropriate small works roster. As an alternative, quotations may be invited from at least five (5) contractors on the appropriate small works roster who have indicated the capability of 2 RESOLUTION NO. performing the kind of work being contracted, in a manner that will equitably distribute the opportunity among the contractors on the appropriate roster. "Equitably distribute" means that the City may not favor certain contractors on the appropriate small works roster over other contractors on the appropriate small works roster who perform similar services. If the City chooses to solicit bids from less than all the appropriate contractors on the appropriate small works roster and the estimated cost of the work is from one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000), then the City, or eCity, must notify the remaining contractors on the appropriate small works roster that quotations on the work are being sought. The City has the sole option of determining whether this notice to the remaining contractors is made by: (1) publishing notice in a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City, (2) mailing a notice to these contractors, or (3) sending a notice to these contractors by facsimile or other electronic means, including email based on the email addresses provided by these contractors to the eCity database. d. At the time quotes are solicited, the City representative shall not inform a contractor of the terms or amount of any other contractor's quote for the same project. e. A written record shall be made by the. City representative of each contractor's bid on the project and of any conditions imposed on the bid. Immediately after an award is made, the bid quotations obtained shall be recorded, open to public inspection, and available by telephone inquiry. 3 RESOLUTION,NO. 4. Limited Public Works Process. If a work, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement project is estimated to cost less than thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000), the City may award such a contract using the limited public works process provided under RCW 39.04.155(3). For a limited public works project, the City will solicit electronic or written quotations from a minimum of three (3) contractors from the appropriate small works roster and shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder as defined under RCW 39.04.010. After an award is made, the quotations shall be open to public inspection and available by electronic request. a. For limited public works projects, the City may waive the payment and performance bond requirements of Chapter 39.08 RCW and the retainage requirements of Chapter 60.28 RCW, thereby assuming the liability for the contractor's nonpayment of laborers, mechanics, subcontractors, materialpersons, suppliers, and taxes imposed under Title 82 RCW that may be due from the contractor for the limited public works project. However, the City shall have the right of recovery against the contractor for any payments made on the contractor's behalf. b. The City shall maintain a list of the contractors contacted and the contracts awarded during the previous twenty-four (24) months under the limited public works process, including the name of the contractor, the contractor's registration number, the amount of the contract, a brief description of the type of work performed, and the date the contract was awarded. c. The City shall attempt to distribute opportunities for limited public works projects equitably among contractors who are willing to perform projects in the City. 4 L` RESOLUTION NO. S. Determining Lowest Responsible Bidder. A responsible bidder shall be a registered and/or licensed contractor who meets the mandatory bidder responsibility criteria established by RCW 39.04.350(1) and who meets any supplementary bidder responsibly criteria established by the City. B. Award. The City shall award the contract for the public works project to the lowest responsible bidder provided that all bids may be rejected and the City may call for new bids. C. Posting. A list of all contracts awarded under these procedures shall be posted on the City's website. Departments using these processes shall'post the award within two (2) weeks of such awards. The posted information shall contain the name of the contractor/vendor awarded the contract, the amount of the contract, the name or a brief description of the items purchased, and the date the contract was awarded. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1433:12/2/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ! -Z/ 7 j-6c,o t, iG�,ct i S e d P15. 41-I(/ 36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS, CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 8, PERMITS — GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 9, PERMITS — SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND LAND USE PERMIT PROCESSES. C) , 2 WHEREAS, City development regulations establish predictable processes for the development and subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, land use permit procedures identify the decision and recommendation authority, process for public notice, open and closed record hearing requirements, and appeal authority; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that streamlining land use permit procedures would result in effective land use permitting; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that public involvement. in land use permitting would remain available to all interested parties; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly cgnsidered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-060D, Other Residential, Lodging and Home Occupations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment A. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-0601, Retail, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION Ill. Subsection 4-2-060J, Entertainment and Recreation, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment C. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-2-060K, Services, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment D. ORDINANCE NO. SECTION V. Subsection 4-2-0601-, Vehicle Related Activities, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment E. SECTION VI. Subsection 2 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts —Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. The following table indicates the maximum requested size/standard change that. may be allowed by an Administrative conditional use permit. Increases above these levels may not be achieved by a variance or the conditional use permit process. APPLICABLE ZONE STANDARD CHANGE REQUEST CN Uses restricted to 3,000 gross s.f. — increases: Between 3,000 — 5,000 s.f. CN Uses restricted to 5,000 gross s.f. — increases up to: 20% or 1,000 gross s.f. Il of the CV Zone Uses restricted to 65,000 gross s.f. — increases up to: 140% or 26,000 gross s.f. SECTION VII. Subsection 10 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 3 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 10. Heights may exceed the maximum height under an Administrative conditional use permit. In consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for a building height in excess of ninety five feet (95') the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee shall consider the following factors in addition to the criteria in RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits, among all other relevant information: a. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Buildings in excess of ninety-five feet (95') in height at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of ninety-five feet (95') in height is adjacent to a lot designated residential on the City Comprehensive Plan, then setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone. L1 ORDINANCE NO. d. Bulk: Buildings near public open spaces should permit public access and, where feasible, physical access to the public open space. Whenever practicable, buildings should be oriented to minimize the shadows they cause on publicly accessible open space. e. Light and Glare: Due consideration shall be given to mitigation of light and glare impacts upon streets, major public facilities and major public open spaces. SECTION VIII. Subsection 12 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 12. Heights may exceed the maximum height by up to fifty feet (50') with bonuses for plazas and other amenities, subject to an Administrative conditional use permit. SECTION IX. Subsection 16 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown as follows: 16. The following height requests may be allowed by an Administrative conditional use permit: 9 ORDINANCE NO. APPLICABLE ZONE I HEIGHT CHANGE REQUEST Exceed height of 50 feet All of the CV Zone Exceed height of 45 feet when abutting R-8 or R-10 Zone All of the CA Zone Exceed maximum height In consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for additional building height, the Reviewing Official shall consider all relevant information, and the following factors along with the criteria in RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits. a. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Building heights shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of the maximum height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot designated R-1, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-F, then the setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the Commercial Zone. SECTION X. Subsection 4 of subsection 4-2-13013, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Industrial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts R ORDINANCE NO. — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. To construct a building or structure in excess of 50' requires an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. SECTION XI. Subsection 4-3-050N.3.a.iii, Review Authority, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: iii. Review Authority: A variance shall be decided by the Administrator based on the standards set forth in RMC 4-9-250B, Variance Procedures. SECTION XII. Subsection 4-3-050N.3.c.iii., Review Authority, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: iii. Review Authority: Variances shall be determined administratively by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee, as indicated in RMC 4-9-250B. SECTION XIII. Subsection 4-4-1301, Variance Procedures, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 7 ORDINANCE NO. I. VARIANCE PROCEDURES: The Reviewing Official shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of this Section pursuant to RMC 4-8-070D and the decision criteria in RMC 4-9-250. SECTION XIV. Section 4-7-020, Administering Authority, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CED): CED is responsible for the administration and coordination of this Chapter including but not limited to, reviewing all engineering and technical requirements of this Chapter, unless another department is authorized to administer and enforce a specific section or sections. B. ADMINISTRATOR: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee shall review and make recommendations to the Hearing Examiner for preliminary plats, but shall have the authority to approve short plats. C. HEARING EXAMINER: The Hearing Examiner is authorized to hold a public hearing on all preliminary plats and shall approve all preliminary plats and final plats. SECTION XV. Subsection 4-7-050C.4, Plats with Four (4) or Less Lots, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled E-1 ke.v C'C-( 'y ORDINANCE NO. "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Short Plats", and to read as follows: 4. Short Plats: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee may approve, modify, or deny the short subdivision; or transfer the matter to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing and decision. SECTION XVI. Subsection 4-7-050C.5, Plats with Five (5) to Nine (9) Lots, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections renumbered accordingly. SECTION XVII. Subsection 4-7-050D.5, Hearing, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of. General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Hearing: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing and issue a final determination regarding the preliminary plat. SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4-7-050D.7, Final Review, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. Final Review: The applicant submits the final plat to the Department of Community and Economic Development for its review. The CED Department will forward the final plat and its recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. 9 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIX. Subsection 4-7-050D.8, Recording, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 8. Recording: The approved final plat is recorded with the office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. SECTION XX. Subsection 4-7-070H.2, Action, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No: 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Action: The Administrator may approve, approve with modifications, or deny the application for a short plat. Action for short plats otherwise referred to the Hearing Examiner, shall be by the Hearing Examiner. Every decision or recommendation made under this Section shall include findings of fact and conclusions to support the decision or recommendation. SECTION XXI. Subsection 4-7-070H.5, Referral to the Hearing Examiner, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: S. Referral to the Hearing Examiner: If the Administrator determines that there are sufficient concerns by residents in the area of the short plat, or by City staff, to warrant a public hearing, then he/she shall refer the short plat to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the public hearing shall be given as required for a full subdivision. sed E9 10 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXII. Subsection 4-7-0801.1, Public Hearing Required, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Public Hearing Required: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing on any preliminary plat and either approve, approve with conditions or deny the preliminary plat. The Hearing Examiner shall assure conformance with the general purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted standards. The Hearing Examiner's decision shall be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law. SECTION XXIII. Subsection 4-7-080J, Health Agency Recommendation, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: J. HEALTH AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: The health agencies responsible for approval of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply shall file with the CED Department, prior to the Hearing Examiner's consideration of the preliminary plat, written statements as to the general adequacy of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply. (Applicant is responsible for submitting appropriate application forms to the Seattle -King County Health Department and for paying the Health Department review fee.) 11 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXIV. Subsection 4-7-080K, City Council Action, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code 'of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby repealed. SECTION XXV. Subsection 4-7-080L.2, Additional Extensions, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Additional Extensions: Additional time extensions beyond this one-year time period may be granted by the Hearing Examiner if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat within the four (4) year time period. The applicant must file a written request with the Hearing Examiner and the CED Department for this additional time extension; this request must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the plat expiration date. The request must include documentation as to the need for the additional time period. SECTION XXVI. Subsection 4-7-080L.4, Phased Subdivision, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Phased Subdivision: In the case of a phased subdivision, final plat approval by the Hearing Examiner of any phase of the preliminary plat will constitute an automatic one-year extension for the filing of the next phase of the subdivision. 12 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXVII. Subsection 4-7-080M.3, Process for Major Amendments, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Process for Major Amendments: If the Administrator determines that the proposed amendment is major, the Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing on the proposed major amendment in accordance with the requirements for preliminary plat approval found in subsection I of this Section provided, however, that any public hearing on a proposed major amendment shall be limited to whether the proposed major amendment should or should not be approved. Following the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve or disapprove any proposed major amendment and may make any modifications in the terms and conditions of the preliminary plat approval to the extent that they are reasonably related to the proposed amendment. If the applicant is unwilling to accept the proposed major amendment under the terms and conditions specified by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant may withdraw the proposed major amendment and develop the subdivision in accordance with the original preliminary plat approval (as it may have previously been amended). SECTION XXVIII. Subsection 4-7-110C, City Council Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Hearing Examiner Approval', and to read as follows: 13 ORDINANCE NO. C. HEARING EXAMINER APPROVAL: At its first public meeting following the date the final plat application has been officially accepted by the CED Department, the Hearing Examiner shall set a date to consider the final plat. The final plat shall be approved, disapproved or returned to the applicant for modification or correction by the Hearing Examiner. SECTION XXIX. Subsection 4-7-110E, Filing Final Plat, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: E. FILING FINAL PLAT: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee must provide written approval of the final plat prior to its submission to the Hearing Examiner. The final plat must then be approved by the Hearing Examiner, and signed by the Mayor and the.City Clerk, prior to being filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections by the City. SECTION XXX. Subsection 4-7-110F, Expiration of Plat After Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: F. EXPIRATION OF PLAT AFTER APPROVAL: 14 ORDINANCE NO. If a final plat has not been recorded within six (6) months after approval by the Hearing Examiner, the plat shall expire and be null and void. To revitalize the expired plat, the plat shall be resubmitted as a preliminary plat. One extension to the six (6) month period may be granted by the Hearing Examiner. SECTION XXXI. Subsection 4-7-120A, Continuity with Improved Additions, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. CONTINUITY WITH IMPROVED ADDITIONS: No plan for the replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any areas shall be approved by the Hearing Examiner unless the streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road or street (according to City specifications) to an existing street or highway. SECTION XXXII. Subsection 4-7-220B, Procedure, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby repealed. SECTION XXXIII. Subsection 4-7-230H, Permit Procedures for Binding Site Plan Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: H. PERMIT PROCEDURES FOR BINDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL: 15 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Permit Type: Binding site plans shall be processed as Type II permits in accordance with the procedures in chapter 4-8 RMC for Type II permits and the standards and criteria set forth in this Section, unless the applicant elects to merge the binding site plan application with the site plan review process or combined site plan/planned action review process in which case the binding site plan shall be processed in accordance with the procedures set out in chapters 4- 8 and 4-9 RMC. If a binding site plan permit is processed concurrently, but not merged with another permit process, then the binding site plan application shall be processed as a Type II permit. 2. Review Authority: Pursuant to chapter 4-8 RMC, the Responsible Official for a binding site plan application shall be the Administrator, unless the applicant elects to have the binding site plan application merged with a Type III permit site plan application or a development agreement under chapter 36.70B RCW. If a binding site plan application is to be processed with a Type III site plan, then the responsible Reviewing Official shall be the Hearing Examiner. If a binding site plan application is to be processed with a development agreement, the responsible Reviewing Official shall be the City Council. The final decision on a development agreement with an application for a binding site plan shall be made by City Council. No administrative appeal of the City Council decision shall be available. If a binding site plan is merged with a planned urban development application, the review authority shall be determined pursuant to RMC 4-9-150. 16 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXXIV. Subsection '4-7-230K.4, Referral to the Hearing Examiner, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Referral to the Hearing Examiner: Except when a binding site plan is merged with a development agreement, if the Reviewing Official determines that there are sufficient concerns by residents in the area of the binding site plan, or by City staff, to warrant a public hearing, then he/she shall refer the binding site plan to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the public hearing will be given as for a Type III permit hearing. Binding site plans merged with development agreements shall be approved by City Council pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.7013.170 et seq. SECTION XXXV. Subsection 4-7-240A, Authority, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. AUTHORITY: A variance from the requirements of this Chapter may be approved by the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B. SECTION XXXVI. Section 4-8-040, Permit Processes Classified by Type, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 17 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-8-040 PERMIT PROCESSES CLASSIFIED BY TYPE: Development subject to review by the City is classified and processed using one of the six (6) types of land use permit procedures listed in RMC 4-8-080G. The review process for the types of permit review procedures are described in RMC 4-8-080H. If the code does not expressly provide for review according to one of the (6) types of permit review procedures, and another specific procedure is not required by law, the Development Services Division shall classify the application. SECTION XXXVII. Subsection 3 of subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Permits to rebuild for nonconforming structures; SECTION XXXVIII. Subsection 15 of subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development. Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 15. Short plats; SECTION XXXIX. Subsection a of subsection 4-8-070D.20, Variances, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 18 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. Administrative pursuant to RMC 4-9-25013; SECTION XL. Subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8; Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 22, to read as follows: 22. Final Planned Urban Developments. SECTION XLI. Subsection 4-8-070H.1, Authority, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Authority: The Hearing Examiner shall review and act on the following: a. Appeals of administrative decisions/determinations (including, but not limited to, parking, sign, street, tree cutting/routine vegetation management standards, and Urban Center Design Overlay District regulations) and ERC decisions, excepting determinations of whether an application is a bulk storage facility which shall be appealable to the City Council, b. Appeals relating to RMC 4-5-060, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, c. Bulk storage special permit and variances from the bulk storage regulations, 19 ORDINANCE NO. d. Permit to rebuild for nonconforming uses, e. Conditional use permit, f. Fill and grade permit, special, g. Master Plan review (overall plan) and major amendments to an overall Master Plan, h. Mobile home parks, preliminary and final, L Planned urban development, preliminary, j. Plats, preliminary and final, k. Shoreline conditional use permit, I. Shoreline variance, m. Site plan approvals requiring a public hearing, n. Special permits, o. Variances from wireless communication facility development standards, the provisions of the subdivision regulations, and variances associated with a development permit that requires review by the Hearing Examiner, and p. Building permits submitted in conjunction with any of the above. SECTION XLIL Subsection 4-8-070H.3, Recommendations, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Recommendations: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing and make recommendations to the City Council on the following: 20 ORDINANCE NO. a. Rezones, site specific, in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, b. Special permits requiring Council approval. SECTION XLII1. Subsection 4-8-0701, City Council, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to delete subsections 7, 8, 9 and 14 and to renumber the remaining subsections accordingly. SECTION XLIV. Subsection 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown on Attachment F. SECTION XLV. Subsection 4-8-080H, Review Processes, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. SECTION XLVI. Subsection 4-9-030C, City Authority, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: C. CITY AUTHORITY: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee or the Hearing Examiner, as specified in RMC 4-2- 060, Zoning Use Tables, shall have the authority to permit conditional uses. SECTION XLVII. Subsection 4-9-030G, Decision Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 21 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "G. DECISION CRITERIA" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-030G.1— 11 shall remain as currently codified, except as amended in Sections XLVIII and XLVIIII of this ordinance. G. DECISION CRITERIA: The Planning Director or the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: SECTION XLVIII. Subsection 4-9-030G.2, Community Need, of Chapter 9, Permits -- Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Community Need: The proposed use constitutes a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. Community Need factors include, among all other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. SECTION XLIX. Subsection 4-9-030G.8, Landscaping, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 22 --- -- ORDINANCE NO. 8. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. SECTION L. Subsection 4-9-030L, Decision and Conditions, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: L. DECISION AND CONDITIONS: The governing authority may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the requested conditional use permit. The Planning Director or Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant the conditional use permit upon making a determination, in writing, that the use is consistent with subsection G of this Section, Decision Criteria. The Planning Director or Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Planning Director or Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. SECTION LI. Subsection 4-9-150C, Roles and Responsibility, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington' ; is hereby amended to read as follows: C. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY: 1. The Department of Community and Economic Development (CED): CED shall be responsible for the general administration and coordination of this 23 ORDINANCE NO. Section. However, all proposed Code modifications shall be reviewed at the same time by the Hearing Examiner. 2. City Departments: Applicable City departments shall review each proposed planned urban development in accordance with procedures in chapters 4-8 and 4-9 RMC as appropriate. 3. Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall be the official City designee for the public hearings, or review of requested Code modifications, as well as the overall proposal itself. SECTION 1-I1. Subsection 4-9-150F, Procedure for Preliminary Approval of Planned Urban Developments, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: F. PROCEDURE FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENTS: The approval of a planned urban development shall be by the Hearing Examiner, upon recommendation from the City Staff, and shall be processed in accordance with the following procedures: 1. Permit Process: Planned urban developments shall be processed consistent with chapter 4-8 RMC as Type II or III permits as specified. 2. Filing of Application: The application for preliminary approval of a planned urban development shall be filed with the Department of Community and Economic Development accompanied by a filing fee as established by RMC 24 ORDINANCE NO. 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. Wherever a planned urban development is intended to be subdivided into smaller parcels, an application for preliminary plat approval may be submitted together with the application for final planned urban development approval. In such case, the preliminary plat and the final planned urban development shall be processed and reviewed concurrently. Subsequent to final planned urban development approval, a planned urban development may also be subdivided by the binding site plan process. 3. Informal Review: Applicant must submit a conceptual plan for preapplication review, prior to submission of an application for preliminary approval. 4. Submittal Requirements and Application Fees: A preliminary development plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development and shall include the general intent of the development, apportionment of land for buildings and land use, proposed phases, if any, and such other information or documentation which the Department of Community and Economic Development shall require. Submittal requirements and fees shall be as listed in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees, and RMC 4-8-120C, Land Use Applications. 5. Public Notice and Comment Period: See RMC 4-8-090, Public Notice Requirements. 6. Phasing: Planned urban developments may be proposed to be developed in one or more phases. If developed in phases, each phase of the planned urban 25 ORDINANCE NO. development shall contain adequate parking, open space, recreation space, public benefits, landscaping, buffering, circulation, utilities and other improvements necessary so that each phase, together with any earlier phases, may stand alone and satisfy the purposes of this Section. Further, each phase must meet the requirements of subsection D2 of this Section, Public Benefit Required, unless the public benefits have been met by previously approved phases. 7. Review Process: The preliminary plan shall be circulated to all reviewing departments for comments. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall evaluate whether the plans comply with the development policies of the Renton Comprehensive Plan and this Section and shall make a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner accordingly. 8. Decision: a. Preliminary Planned Urban Development — New Development: After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall contain an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units of the planned urban development, and any phases thereof, as well as the effective date of approval and the date of expiration of such approval. b. Preliminary Planned Urban Development — Existing Development with Binding Site Plan: After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall 26 ORDINANCE NO. contain an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units of the planned urban development, and any phases thereof, as well as the effective date of approval and the date of expiration of such approval, on its face prior to recording with King County. 9. Effect of an Approved Preliminary Plan: The approval of a preliminary plan constitutes the City's acceptance of the general project, including its density, intensity, arrangement and design. Approval authorizes the applicant or subsequent owner to apply for final plan approval of the planned urban development or phase(s) thereof. Preliminary plan approval does not authorize any building permits or any site work without appropriate permits. An approved preliminary plan binds the future planned urban development site and all subsequent owners to the uses, densities, and standards of the preliminary plan until such time as a final plan is approved for the entire site or all phases of the site, or a new preliminary plan is approved, or the preliminary plan is abandoned in writing or expires subject to the provisions of subsections G and K of this Section. 10. Zoning Map Revised: a. New Planned Urban Development Approval: Upon the authority of the approval ordinance of a preliminary planned urban development, the City shall place the planned urban development land use file number as an overlay on the subject property on the City of Renton Zoning Map. 27 ORDINANCE NO. b. Demonstration Ordinances: Ordinances 4468 and 4550 which created demonstration developments known as Village on Union and certain divisions of the Orchards are hereby considered final planned urban developments for the purposes of code implementation. SECTION Lill. Subsection 4-9-150G.1, Time Limits; of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Time Limits: The developer shall, within two (2) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner to approve the preliminary plan, submit to the Department of Community and Economic Development a final development plan showing the ultimate design and specific details of the proposed planned urban development or the final phase or phases thereof. Upon application by the developer, the Hearing Examiner may grant an extension of the approved preliminary plan for a maximum of twelve (12) months. Application for such extension shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of preliminary plan approval. Only one such extension may be granted for a planned urban development. If a final development plan is not filed within such two (2) years or within the extended time period, if any, the planned urban development preliminary plan shall be deemed to have expired or been abandoned. To activate an expired or abandoned planned urban development a new application is required. 28 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION LIV. Subsectiori 4-9-150G.2, Submittal Requirements and Fees for Final Plan Application, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Submittal Requirements and Fees for Final Plan Application: A final plan application shall be submitted for a planned urban development, or a phase thereof, to the Department of Community and Economic Development. The proposed final plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plans, including phasing, subject to the provisions of subsections G4 and G5 of this Section. Submittal requirements shall be as listed in RMC 4-8- 120C, Land Use Applications. Application fees shall be as listed in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. SECTION LV. Subsection 4-9-150G.6, Review and Approval of Final Plan, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Review and Approval of Final Plan: The final plan shall be reviewed by the applicable City departments, in the manner prescribed for preliminary plans, to determine if the final plan is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plan and is consistent with the purposes and review criteria of this Section. The Planning Director shall make a decision to approve, approve with conditions or deny the final plan. The decision shall include a description of the 29 ORDINANCE NO. elements of the approved planned urban development, including land uses, number of units, phasing, the effective date of approval and of expiration, time limits, required improvements and the schedule for implementation, and .any conditions that may apply to the planned urban development. a. Covenants Required: i. Covenants Generally: As a condition of final planned urban development approval, covenants shall be executed that run with the land, and with all subdivided portions thereof, stating that such property is part of an approved planned urban development, and including the file number thereof and a description of the uses, densities and phases of the approved planned urban development. Such covenant shall also be recorded for each property created through any subsequent subdivisions. ii. Specifications of Variations: All final planned urban developments shall include specifications that are recorded with the planned urban development indicating which lots or structures vary from which specific zoning requirement. Covenants shall indicate that such lots or structures shall meet the standard created with the approval of the planned urban development or the current zone in effect at the time of subsequent land use, building or construction permits. b. Property Owners' Association Required: For residential planned urban developments, the developer or owner(s) of a planned urban development shall be required to form a legally incorporated property owners' 30 ORDINANCE NO. association prior to the occupancy of any portion of a planned urban development. If there is only one owner of the planned urban development, either a property owners' association shall be formed or a covenant running with the land shall be filed requiring the formation of such an association prior to the first subsequent sale of the property, or portion thereof. For nonresidential planned urban developments, the City may establish covenants as necessary to ensure maintenance of infrastructure and open space or other common improvements. SECTION LVI. Subsection 4-9-150G.8.a, Expiration, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. Expiration: The applicant shall prepare and submit building permit applications which are accepted as substantially complete to the Department of Community and Economic Development within six (6) months of the effective date of approval. The developer shall complete the approved planned urban development or any phase thereof included in the approved final plan within two (2) years from the date of the decision to approve the final plan by the Planning Director, unless a shorter time is designated. Failure to complete the planned urban development, or any phase thereof, within this time limit will require the submittal of a new preliminary and final plan application in order to continue construction of the planned urban development. Failure to submit a new application or to complete the planned urban development once 31 ORDINANCE NO. construction has begun shall constitute abandonment of the planned urban development subject to subsection 1 of this Section. Expiration of any building permit issued for a planned urban development shall be governed by the provisions of the applicable Building Code. Construction of any portion of the planned urban development requires a current approved planned urban development and a current building permit. SECTION LVII. Subsection 4-9-1501, Appeals of Examiner's Decision on a Final Planned Urban Development, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: I. APPEALS OF EXAMINER'S DECISION ON A FINAL PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT: The Planning Directors decision on a final planned urban development may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to RMC 4-8-110. If the Hearing Examiner acts on appeal to approve a final planned urban development, the decision will include an effective date of approval consistent with subsections G and K of this Section. SECTION LVIII. Subsection 4-9-150K.1, Expiration, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Expiration: Expiration of an approved preliminary plan shall be defined as failure to satisfy the time limits or other requirements of submitting a final plan 32 ORDINANCE NO. application. Expiration of an approved final plan planned urban development shall be defined as failure to initiate construction of a planned urban development. Expiration can only occur if no on -site construction has begun or a lack of significant progress under those building permits has occurred. Upon expiration of a preliminary or final plan, the undeveloped site may only be developed if a new preliminary and final plan planned urban development is approved or if the Hearing Examiner removes the planned urban development designation and revokes the original approval. SECTION LIX. Subsection 4-9-150L, Appeal of Council Decision on Planned Urban Development, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections re -lettered accordingly. SECTION LX. Subsection 4-9-250B.1, Authority and Applicability, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Authority and Applicability for Administrative Variances: The Community and Economic Development Administrator and/or designee shall have the authority to grant variances from the following development standards when no other permit or approval requires Hearing Examiner Review: a. Residential Land Uses: Lot width, lot depth, setbacks, allowed projections into setbacks, and lot coverage. Lot width, lot depth, and setback 33 ORDINANCE NO. variations do not require a variance if the request is part of a stream daylighting proposal and meets criteria in RMC 4-3-050L; and b. Commercial and Industrial Land Uses: Screening of surface -mounted equipment and screening of roof -mounted equipment. c. Proposals Located Within Critical Areas: i. Aquifer Protection Areas: If an applicant feels that the strict application. of aquifer protection regulations would deny all reasonable use of the property or would deny installation of public transportation or utility facilities determined by the public agency proposing these facilities to be in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare, the applicant of a development proposal may apply for a variance. ii. Flood Hazards: Variances from the flood hazard requirements of RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations. iii. Steep Slopes Forty Percent (40%) or Greater and Very High Landslide Hazards: The construction of one single family home on a pre-existing platted lot where there is not enough developable area elsewhere on the site to accommodate building pads and provide practical off-street parking. A. Wetlands: (a) Creation/restoration/enhancement ratios: Categories 1 and 2. (b) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050M6e and M6f: Category 3. 34 ORDINANCE NO. (c) A new or expanded single family residence on an existing, legal lot, having a regulated Category 3 wetland. (d) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050M6e and M6f— Category 1 or 2. v. Streams and Lakes: (a) A new or expanded single family residence on a pre-existing platted lot where there is not enough developable area elsewhere on the site to accommodate building pads and provide practical off-street parking, providing reasonable use of the property. (b) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050L, Streams and Lakes (Class 2 to 4). (c) Activities proposing to vary from stream regulations not listed elsewhere in subsection B1a of this Section, and authorized to be requested as variances in RMC 4-3-050L. vi. General: Public/quasi-public utility or agency proposing to alter aquifer protection, geologic hazard, habitat or wetlands regulations not listed above. SECTION LXI. Subsection 4-9-250B.7, Special Review Criteria for Variances from Aquifer Protection Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 35 ORDINANCE NO. 7. Special Review Criteria for Variances from the Aquifer Protection Regulations: Except for public or quasi -public utility or agency proposals which are subject to subsection B10 of this Section, the following criteria shall be considered, in addition to those criteria in subsections B5 and B6 of this Section, for variances from aquifer protection regulations: a. That the proposed activities will not cause significant degradation of groundwater or surface water quality; and b. That the applicant has taken deliberate measures to minimize aquifer impacts, including but not limited to the following: i. Limiting the degree or magnitude of the hazardous material and activity; and "IM ii. Limiting the implementation of the hazardous material and activity; iii. Using appropriate and best available technology; and iv. Taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; and c. That there will be no damage to nearby public or private property and no threat to the health or safety of people on or off the property; and d. The proposed variance is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed. SECTION LXII. Subsection 4-9-250B.8, Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title 36 ORDINANCE NO. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "8. Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations:" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-250B.8.a - e shall remain as currently codified, except as amended in Sections LXIII and LXIV of this ordinance. 8. Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations: In lieu of the variance criteria of subsection B5 of this Section, the following directives and criteria shall be utilized by the Reviewing Official in the review of variance applications related to the flood hazard requirements of the critical areas regulations: SECTION LXIII. Subsection 4-9-250B.8.b, Review Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "b. Review Criteria" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-B.8.b.i - vi shall remain as currently codified. b. Review Criteria: In passing upon such an application for a variance, the Reviewing Official shall consider the following review criteria: SECTION LXIV. Subsection 4-9-250B.8.c, Conditions of Approval, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 37 ORDINANCE NO. c. Conditions of Approval: Upon consideration of the factors of subsection 138b of this Section, and the purposes of this Section, the Reviewing Official may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this Section. SECTION LXV. Subsection a of subsection 4-9-250B.9, Special Review Criteria — Single Family Residence on a Legal Lot with a Category 3 Wetland; or Single Family Residence on a Legal Lot with a Class 2, 3, or 4 Stream/Lake, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. The proposal is the minimum necessary to accommodate the building footprint and access. In no case, however, shall the impervious surface exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet, including access. Otherwise the alteration shall be subject to the review criteria of subsection B6 of this Section; SECTION LXVI. Subsection i of subsection 4-9-25013.10, Special Review Criteria — Public/Quasi-Public Utility or Agency Altering Aquifer Protection, Geologic Hazard, Habitat, Stream/Lake or Wetland Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: L The approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose; and 38 ■a . ORDINANCE NO. SECTION LXVII. Section 4-11-160, Definitions P, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add the definition of "Planning Director' to read as follows: PLANNING DIRECTOR: The individual under the direction of the Community and Economic Development Administrator who plans, organizes, coordinates and directs the City's Planning Division, including the development and adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and development regulations. Additionally, the Planning Director is responsible for application and enforcement of the City's zoning, shoreline management, and environmental ordinances, review and processing of all land use subdivision permit applications. SECTION LXVIII. Section 4-11-260, Definitions Z, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to delete the definition of "Zoning Administrator". SECTION LXIX. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 39 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 0 R D:1609:11/23/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 40 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. m� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON AND REFERRED TO AS THE FAIRWOOD ANNEXATION; STATING THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS RESIDING THEREIN AS NEARLY! AS MAY BE; CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON AUG'd5 0, TO SUBMIT TO/JD�%!� ! —/ VOTERS OF THE TERRITORY THE PROPOSAL FOR ANNEXATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENTION AS WELL AS TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF KING COUNTY AND THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, AND TO TAKE THOSE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO PLACE PROPOSITION 1 BEFORE THE VOTERS, INCLUDING THE PREPARATION OF INFORMATION FOR THE VOTER'S PAMPHLET. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has, within its Potential Annexation Area, unincorporated territory commonly referred to as the Fairwood Annexation Area, consisting of approximately 4,479 acres, which area is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City was presented a 60% petition to annex an area known as the Red Mill Annexation Area, but the petition was held in abeyance because of the pending incorporation vote for the City of Fairwood; and WHEREAS, the City was presented with a 10% petition to annex an area known as the Greater Fairwood Communities Annexation Area and passed Resolution 3991 calling for annexation by the election method, but the petition was also held in abeyance because of the pending incorporation vote for the City of Fairwood; and WHEREAS, the incorporation vote failed; and WHEREAS, resubmitting the petitions to present a consolidated annexation proposal could be confusing and time-consuming; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has consistently stated that the future governance of the Fairwood area should be the choice of residents, with accurate information to make an informed decision; and WHEREAS, the state has created a sales tax credit funding mechanism for, annexations of over 10,000 population to aid cities, such as Renton, with the expenses of annexing areas within their potential annexation areas; and WHEREAS, the sales tax credit mechanism, which assists the cities in covering the costs of new annexations will expire, according to its terms, for annexations not commenced before January 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, it will be financially infeasible for the City to annex the Fairwood area or any other large area without financial assistance from the state sales tax credit, or another mechanism; and WHEREAS, there is little time for the City to commence annexation of the Fairwood area before the expiration of the sales tax credit; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to initiate annexations via election pursuant to RCW 35A.14.015; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property within Renton's established Potential Annexation Area generally bounded by SE 162"d Place on the north, 128th Avenue SE on the west, SE 192"d Street on the south, and extending to east to the King County Urban Growth Boundary as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and 2 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to call for an election for this annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is14,189. SECTION III. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held on August 17, 2010, pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW, to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. SECTION IV. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION V. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington and with the King County Boundary Review Board. SECTION VI. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. SECTION VII. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place Proposition 1 before the voters in the August 17, 2010, election, for the Fairwood Annexation. SECTION VIII. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition 1. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to King County Division of Records and Elections: El RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSITION 1 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON The Renton City Council received a petition to annex property to the City of Renton and passed a resolution calling for an election on the question. This measure would authorize annexation of that property, generally referred to as the Fairwood Annexation Area, to the City of Renton. Shall that area in unincorporated King County known as the Fairwood Annexation Area, as legally described in the above -mentioned resolution, be annexed to the City of Renton? ❑ For Annexation ❑ Against Annexation SECTION IX. The Mayor is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 1 in the voter's pamphlet for the August 17, 2010 election. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1353:11/10/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. �V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SMALL PUBLIC WORKS ROSTER PROCESS TO SOLICIT PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT BIDS FOR CONTRACTS ESTIMATED TO COST LESS THAN THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000) AND A LIMITED PUBLIC WORKS PROCESS FOR BIDS ESTIMATED TO COST LESS THAN THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($35,000). WHEREAS, RCW 39.04.155 and other laws regarding contracting for public works by municipalities, allow certain contracts to be awarded by a small works roster process; and WHEREAS, in order to be able to implement small works roster processes, the City is required by law to adopt legislation establishing specific procedures; and WHEREAS, the City has an Interlocal Agreement with eCityGov Alliance (hereinafter "eCity") that allows the City to use the Small Works Roster established by eCity; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION I1. The use of a Small Public Works Roster is hereby authorized, using the following process: A. . Small Public Works Roster. The following small works roster procedures are established for use by the City pursuant to RCW 39.04.155: 1. Eligible Project Cost Threshold. The City need not comply with formal sealed bidding procedures for the construction, building, renovation, remodeling, alteration, repair, or improvement of real property where the estimated cost does not exceed three hundred 1 RESOLUTION NO. performing the kind of work being contracted, in a manner that will equitably distribute the opportunity among the contractors on the appropriate roster. "Equitably distribute" means that the City may not favor certain contractors on the appropriate small works roster over other contractors on the appropriate small works roster who perform similar services. If the City chooses to solicit bids from less than all the appropriate contractors on the appropriate small works roster and the estimated cost of the work is from one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000), then the City, or eCity, must notify the remaining contractors on the appropriate small works roster that quotations on the work are being sought. The City has the sole option of determining whether this notice to the remaining contractors is made by: (1) publishing notice in a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City, (2) mailing a notice to these contractors, or (3) sending a notice to these contractors by facsimile or other electronic means, including email based on the email addresses provided by these contractors to the eCity database. d. At the time quotes are solicited, the City representative shall not inform a contractor of the terms or amount of any other contractor's quote for the same project. e. A written record shall be made by the City representative of each contractor's bid on the project and of any conditions imposed on the bid. Immediately after an award is made, the bid quotations obtained shall be recorded, open to public inspection, and available by telephone inquiry. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4. Limited Public Works Process. If a work, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement project is estimated to cost less than thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000), the City may award such a contract using the limited public works process provided under RCW 39.04.155(3). For a limited public works project, the City will solicit electronic or written quotations from a minimum of three (3) contractors from the appropriate small works roster and shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder as defined under RCW 39.04.010. After an award is made, the quotations shall be open to public inspection and available by electronic request. a. For limited public works projects, the City may waive the payment and performance bond requirements of Chapter 39.08 RCW and the retainage requirements of Chapter 60.28 RCW, thereby assuming the liability for the contractor's nonpayment of laborers, mechanics, subcontractors, materialpersons, suppliers, and taxes imposed under Title 82 RCW that may be due from the contractor for the limited public works project. However, the City shall have the right of recovery against the contractor for any payments made on the contractor's behalf.. b. The City shall maintain a list of the contractors contacted and the contracts awarded during the previous twenty-four (24) months under the limited public works process, including the name of the contractor, the contractor's registration number, the amount of the contract, a brief description of the type of work performed, and the date the contract was awarded. c. The City shall attempt to distribute opportunities for limited public works projects equitably among contractors who are willing to perform projects in the City. 4 RESOLUTION NO. S. Determining Lowest Responsible Bidder. A responsible bidder shall be a registered and/or licensed contractor who meets the mandatory bidder responsibility criteria established by RCW 39.04.350(1) and who meets any supplementary bidder responsibly criteria established by the City. B. Award. The City shall award the contract for the public works project to the lowest responsible bidder provided that all bids may be rejected and the City may call for new bids. C. Posting. A list of all contracts awarded under these procedures shall be posted on the City's website. Departments using these processes shall post the award within two (2) weeks of such awards. The posted information shall contain the name of the contractor/vendor awarded the contract, the amount of the contract, the name or a brief description of the items purchased, and the date the contract was awarded. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1433:12/2/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 5 I Z/'rzoo CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4/S AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEAR 2009 ANNUAL BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 5423 AND THEREAFTER AMENDED BY ORDINANCES 5441, 5451, 5455, 5464 AND 5483. WHEREAS, on November 17, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5423, approving the City of Renton's 2009 Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5441, adding the City Attorney's Office positions to the 2009 adopted Budget; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5451, appropriating funds in the Golf Course Fund for certain expenses related to securing water rights at the Golf Course; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5455, carrying forward funds to complete projects authorized and funded in 2008, but not yet completed; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5464, modifying its revenue projections and appropriations for 2009 as required by economic conditions; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5483, increasing the General Fund for the purpose of supplemental funding to support the City's Emergency Management Program; and WHEREAS, year-end forecasts and estimates require the City to modify its revenue projections and the appropriations for 2009; 1 ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Ordinances 5423, 5441, 5451, 5455, 5464 and 5483 establishing the City of Renton's 2009 Annual Budget are hereby amended in the amount of $7,580,596 to an amended total appropriation of $288,880,820. SECTION II. A summary budget adjustment by fund is hereby attached as Attachment A. A detailed list of adjustments is available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: O R D :1604:12/3/09 : sc r 2 Denis Law, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A 2009 FINAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST ANALYSISISUMMARY BEGINNING FUND BALANCE I REVENUE I EXPENDITURES END FUND BALANCE 2009 Budgeted 2009 Budget 2009 Adjusted 2009 Budgeted 2009 Budget 2009 Adjusted 2009 Budgeted 2009 Budget ZOOS Adjusted Ending Fund Required Available Fund Fund! Beg Fund Bal Changes Fund Sal Revenue Chances Revenue ExDanditure Chances Fxuandlture Balance Reserves Balance 000 GENERAL 5;700,507:, :.. .. 5,700,507 86;977.519 577.830. 67AS5,349: 6 ' 6%273,315 069,294 70,142,609 3,113,247 3.11,3247 001 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,346,619 2,346,619 13,949,082 (70,840) 13,870.242 13,938,352 (129,506) 13.808.846 2,408.015 2,408,015 A03 SrREETS 1,896,458 1,896,458. 1;793,809 51,608 6,845,417 81902.229 51,698. 8,953;- .. ',.. 1,788,038 ... 1,788,038 004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRAM (18,496) (18,496) 357,935 116,007 473,942 355,921 116,007 471.928 (16,482) (16,482 005 MUSEUM151,124 - 151,124 149,625 149.626 1,499 1,499 006 LIBRARY 1.078,408 1,078,408 2,198,01E 293,000 2,491,018 2,127,961 293,000 2,420,961 1,148.465 1,148.465 007 PARKING GARAGE MAINTENANCE 009 FARMERSMARKET 52,147 52,147 35,280 - 35,280 35,280 - 35.280 52,147 52,147 010 FIRE AND EMERGENCYSVCMEkORtAL 57,062 57,062 151000 15,006 72.062 7ZO32 011 FIRE AND EMERGENCY SVC HEALTH b WELLNESt 34.153 34.153 25,000 - 25,000 59,153 - 59,153 - 031 PARK MEMORIAL ; . 173,452 173,452 _ - 173,452 173.452 201 1997 LIM GO BONDS -CITY HALL 96 1,E 1,968 980,440 - 980,440 1,980,440 - 1,980.440 (998,032) (998,032 201=1974LIM GO BONOS-SR CTR 219 GENERAL GOVERNMENT M(SC DEBT SVC 494,283 494,283 2,244,941 2244,941 2,2B6,941 2,286,941 452,283 452,283 Total Gen" OovetnffAntal Funds 11,816,"1 11,816,661 96,728,148 96g,606 ':.: 868877b3 :'.' 99,181,2T9 1.200,403 1100,381,662 ...0.12ZGn $122632 10Z.ARTERIALSTREETS 372,730 4m730 WEIA75 6M.675 750,00D - 750.000 261,305 261.305 108 LEASED CITY PROPERTIES 1,252,058 1.252,058 1,244,322 728,053 1,972,375 1,881,220 728,063 2,609,201 615,152 615,152 110 SPECl/LLHOTEL-MOTELTAX 250,746 250,740 340,400 340,400 326,000 326,000 - 285,146 265.146 118 CUM 2755(PATHSRRAILS) 3,243 3,243 - - - 3,243 3,243 M.ONE PERCENT :FOR ART 121.678 121,678 - 45,000 451000 - 45,000 45.000 121,678 121,678 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 112,368 112,368 85,674 85.674 85,674 - 85,674 112,368 lIZ368 135 SPRINGBROOKWETLANOSOJWK 8,502 8,502 10,500 - 10,500 - - '1910D2 19.002 219 1 W9 UNLIM GO BONDS -SR HOUSING 496.119 496,119 5,100 - '5.100 523,23(} - 523230 (22,011) (22,011) 303 COM"ITY SERVICES MPACT MITIGATION 1,670,D13 t 670,D13. 300,000 5,696 305,696 711,038 711,03W r : 7 3&1;671 1:254,671 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2,375,767 2,375.767 300,000 - 300.000 300,0DO - 300,000 2,375,767 2,375,767 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MITIGATION 3.332.474 3,313,4.7Q 4D0,000 173.102 573,102 3.DD0,000 111,102 3,173,102 :132i474 - 732,474 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 12,375,315 12,375,315 4,253,941 630,291 4.884,232 16.029,256 521,510 16,550,766 708,761 708,781 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 2,976.785 2,978,785 26,002,547 2,498.674 28,501221 28,535,997 44KO74 31,034,671 443,335 443,335 316 SOUTH LAKE WA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (999,477) (999,4T7) 14,744,767 (2,150.000) 12,594,767 13,693,912 - 13,693,912 (2,098,622) (2,098,622) 326 tIOUSING OPPORTUNITY 2DD,325 200,326 - - 200,325 200,325 402 AJRPORT OPERATIONS 683,924 583,924 12D9,511 - 1,209,511 1,523.268 - 1,523,268 270,167 270.167 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 651,755 651;755. r 15,123.236 - 15,123236 14,892,195 - 14,892,198 882,793 .. WBZ7.w 404 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SYSTEM 861,013 861,013 2,469,699 - 2.469,699 2,479,403 - 2,479,403 851,309 851,309 40 WATER OPERATIONS 5,104276 5,104.276 10,075,032 10,075.032 12,551,648 240.000 12,791,648 2,387,660 (1,955.020) 43ZOC 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS 2,941,862 2,941,862 5,557,005 - 5,557,085 7,344.283 - 7,344,283 1,154.654 (838,706) 315.958 407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS 3;246,17T 3246,177 5,611,584 15,000 0,626,584 ..4071700 250,000 8.121,700 751,061 (497,632) 253,429 416 KING COUNTY METRO (97,685) (97,685) 11,414,60 11.414.648 11.414.648 - 11,414,648 (97,695) (97,605) 422 AIRPORTCAP1TAL IMPROVEMENT 284.452 284.4% 4,541,037 614A34 5,155,071 4,749.991 620,370 :5,470,361. .;. 69,162 69,162 424 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SYSTEM CIP 257.677 257,677 154,080 - 154,080 331,398 - 331,398 W,359 80,359 425 WATER CIP 2,132,262 2,132.262 4,971,891 100,000 6,071,891 6,980,000 6.960.000 224,153 224,153 426 WASTEWATER CIP 720.740 720,740 4,573,674 - 4.573,674 5210,000 - 5.210,000 B4,414 84,414 427 SURFACE WATER CIP 734,3D4 734,304 4,821,017 199,500 5,020,517 5AM.00D 199,500 5,729,500 25,321 25.321 461 WATERWORKS BOND RESERVE 106.377 106.377 - 106,377 - 106,377 - 471 WATERWORKSRATE•STABILIZATKNI 15,502 J5;502 15,502 15,502 461 FUTURE WIS BOND PROCEEDS 174,840 174,840 - - 174,840 - 174,840 - 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,366,730 $365,730 5.725,124 (105,500) 6,619,624 4,135,353 372,416 4,507,771 3,478,50 3,478,50 502 INSURANCE 10,710.432 10,710,432 3,103,522 - 3.103,522 8,085,440 - 8,085,440 5,728,514 (5,325,000) 403,514 5D31NFORMATKNNSERVICES 1,530.937 1,530,937 .. 3,764,860 114,687 3,899,547 4,735,993 114,687 4,850,680 579,804 579,804 504 FACILITIES 4232262 117,392 4,349,654 41197,096 21,746 4,218,B42 130,812 130,812 505 COMMCRILCATLONB . ' 1.100,708 - 1.100,700 1,100.708 (115.905) 954,BD3 115,905 115,905 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 3,780.354 3,786.354 11.038,166 - 11.038,166 11,057.967 - 11.057,967 3.7W,553 (3,317,390) 443.163 522 LEOFFIRETIREES HEALTHCARE 1J174,147 1,874,147. 2,040,5W - 2,040,530 1,979,061 - 1,970,051 1,935,616 (395,812) 1,539,804 611 FIREMENS PENSION 4,265.991 4,265,991 290,D00 290,000 542,276 542,276 4.013,715 4,013,715 Total OdW Funde 68,794,713 66,794 13 160,183492 2,986,629 16%149,42/ 182,118,9411 6,380,193 1NA",136 31,41-K296 (12,329,680) 19,116AN TOTALALLFUNDS 78,611,274 78,611X4. ..246,891MO 3,946A34 249,83T,174 281,30IX224 7,5W0,696 me80,820 39,967.626 (12,329,660) 27,238,068 i z)-7/r_ooq CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON adIDI&W 1A ISM O� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $3,344 PER NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME IN THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT; SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $5,394 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $3,322 PER NEW MULTI -FAMILY HOME IN THE KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $6,310 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $1,258 PER NEW MULTI -FAMILY HOME IN THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the Issaquah School District an impact fee of $5,495 for each new single-family home built within the Issaquah School District's boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the Issaquah School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an decrease in the impact fee for new single-family homes to $3,344; and WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the 1 ORDINANCE NO. Kent School District an impact fee of $5,304 for each new single-family home and $3,266 per new multi -family unit built within the Kent School District's boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the Kent School District's 2009/2010 — 2014/2015 Capital Facilities Plan, which recommends an increase in the impact fee for new single-family homes to $5,394 and an increase in the impact fee for new multi -family units to $3,322; and WHEREAS, until recently the Renton School District has been able to accommodate growth within existing facilities, but currently estimates a need for additional school facilities within the next six (6) years to accommodate anticipated growth; and WHEREAS, the Renton School District has requested that the City of Renton adopt the Renton School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan, which recommends the collection of an impact fee for new single-family homes of $6,310 and the collection of an impact fee for new multi -family units of $1,258; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF, THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Note 5 of subsection 4-1-160D, Fee Calculations, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this subsection, as it sees fit, to take into account local conditions such as, but not limited to, price differentials throughout the District in the cost of new housing, school 2 ORDINANCE NO. occupancy levels, and the percent of the District's Capital Facilities Budget, which will be expended locally. The City council establishes the following fees: Single -Family Multi -Family Fee Fee Amount Amount Issaquah $3,344.00 Not Applicable. School District Kent School $5,394.00 $3,322.00 District Renton School $6,310.00 $1,258.00 District SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-160J, Adoption of the District Capital Facilities Plan and Submission of the Annual Updates and Report and Data, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. The following capital facilities plans are hereby adopted by reference by the City as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan: a. The Issaquah School District No. 4112009 Capital Facilities Plan; b. The Kent School District No. 415 2009/2010 — 2014/2015 Capital Facilities Plan; c. The Renton School District No. 403 2008 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. On an annual basis, the District shall submit the following materials to the City: 3 ORDINANCE NO. a. The annual update of the District's Capital Facilities Plan; b. An annual report on the School Impact Fee Account, showing the source and amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty (30) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _ , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: O RD:1611:11/19/09:scr 4 Denis Law, Mayor CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5,51-5' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO CLARIFY THAT ALLEY NETWORKS ARE NOT A GENERAL REQUIREMENT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION IMPLEMENTED BY THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC), RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (R-1), AND RESIDENTIAL-4 DU/AC (R-4) ZONES. D-0 7 WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy encourages the construction of alleys in small -lot subdivisions and new developments to visually improve the streetscape, increase the safety of perimeter sidewalks, and facilitate off-street parking; and WHEREAS, alley networks have developed around the City with the exception of low density large -lot residential areas; and and WHEREAS, City requirements for alleys in -large -lot residential zones should be clarified; WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-7-150E.5, Alley Access, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 ORDINANCE NO. S. Alley Access: Alley access is the preferred street pattern except for properties in the Residential Low Density land use designation. The Residential Low Density land use designation includes the RC, R-1, and R-4 zones. Prior to approval of a plat without alley access, the Reviewing Official shall evaluate an alley layout and determine that the use of alley(s) is not feasible. Within the R-4 zone, alley access may be required by the Reviewing Official based on one or more of the following criteria: a. Minimum lot widths are reduced; or b. An increase in density is allowed; or c. Alley(s) are present in the surrounding area; or d. If significant trees and/or vegetation are preserved; or e. The clustering of homes is allowed; or f. If site characteristics allow for the effective use of alley(s). SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2009. Denis Law, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1605:11/16/09:scr c zj�/tea � CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON /oi lil p ORDINANCE NO. ,S 16' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS, AND CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE PROCESSES RELATED TO AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE TITLE IV DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. D — I�p WHEREAS, the City has the duty and responsibility to amend its Development Regulations periodically to correct errors, fix omissions, clarify standards, delete outdated provisions, and incorporate new regulations; and WHEREAS, the City updates its Comprehensive Plan annually, in compliance with RCW 36.70A (the Growth Management Act); and WHEREAS, the City desires to have meaningful and easy to understand processes for the amendment of its Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations to encourage public participation in these processes and to ensure the transparency of governmental decision making; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the development regulation text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; 1 ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The subsection labeled "Type IX4,, of subsection 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to require an open public hearing before the Planning Commission for development regulation text amendments, as shown in Attachment A. SECTION II. The subsection labeled "Type X4i of subsection 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to require an open public hearing before the Planning Commission for Comprehensive Plan amendments and associated rezones, and to delete the requirement to refer amendments of development regulations to the Planning Commission, as shown in Attachment B. SECTION III. Section 4-9-020, Comprehensive Plan Adoption and Amendment Process, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is herby amended to read as follows: 4-9-020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT PROCESS A. PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe the procedures and review criteria for Comprehensive Plan amendments. 2 ORDINANCE NO. B. AUTHORITY The Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires that an adopted Comprehensive Plan shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation and that any amendment or revision to the Comprehensive Plan conform to the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW, and that any change to development regulations or official controls is consistent with and implements the Comprehensive Plan. GMA requires that the City perform its activities and make. capital budget decisions in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, GMA specifically requires that the City establish procedures whereby proposed amendments or revisions of the Comprehensive Plan are considered by City Council no more frequently than once every year, with the following exceptions: initial adoption of a subarea plan; adoption or amendment of a Shoreline Master Program; amendment of the Capital Facilities element; and whenever an emergency exists. Proposed amendments must be considered concurrently so the cumulative effect of the proposals can be ascertained. C. INITIATION OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 1. The Mayor, City Council, or Planning Commission may initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment by submitting the request in writing to the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development. 2. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may initiate Comprehensive Plan amendments that are necessary 3 ORDINANCE NO. to ensure the consistency of the Comprehensive Plan, or other City plans and policies, with GMA. 3. Private parties may initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment by submitting an application by December 15th for consideration the following year. D. APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The application and submittal requirements for amendments initiated by private parties are listed in RMC 4-8-120C, Land Use Applications. City initiated amendments are exempt from formal application. 2. The fee for amendments initiated by private parties is listed in RMC 4-1- 170, Land Use Review Fees. City initiated amendments will not be assessed a fee. 3. Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments shall not be accepted in the following circumstances, unless the amendment involves the correction of a technical error: a. Applications which were submitted for amendment in the previous Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle that were denied; b. Applications for amendment of the Comprehensive Plan land use map involving properties considered for amendment in the previous Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle; c. Applications for amendment involving properties located within a community planning area in which the community planning process has been initiated; or, where a community plan has been adopted within the two (2) years prior to the amendment cycle. 4 ORDINANCE NO. E. REVIEW PROCESS 1. Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be considered by the City Council concurrently, and no more frequently than once per year, unless the amendment is exem.pt by GMA from the annual amendment cycle. 2. Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments by private parties shall be accepted by the Department of Community and Economic Development between October 15t and December 15th for consideration during the following year. 3. City -initiated applications shall be initiated by June 15th for consideration during the current year's amendment cycle. City -initiated applications accepted after June 15th will be considered during the next amendment cycle. This does not apply to amendments exempt by GMA from the annual amendment cycle. 4. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall conduct its review of Comprehensive Plan amendments concurrently with Planning Commission review. However, all departmental reporting and evaluation, including necessary environmental review, shall be completed prior to the Planning Commission making recommendations on the Comprehensive Plan amendments. 5. The Planning Commission shall consider all Comprehensive Plan amendments, unless exempt by GMA from the annual amendment cycle, concurrently so that the cumulative effect of the proposals can be ascertained. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 6. Planning Commission shall forward a recommendation to the City Council after a public hearing. 7. Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be adopted by ordinance of the City Council. F. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. All Comprehensive Plan amendments will be evaluated on their merits based upon the following: a. The effect upon the rate of growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan; b. The effect upon the City's capacity to provide adequate public facilities; c. The effect upon the rate of population and employment growth; d. Whether Comprehensive Plan objectives are being met as specified or remain valid and desirable; e. The effect upon general land values and housing costs; f. Whether capital improvements or expenditures, including transportation, are being made or completed as expected; g. Whether the initiated amendment conforms to the requirements of the GMA, is internally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and is consistent with the County -wide Planning Policies for King County; h. The effect upon critical areas and natural resource lands; A ORDINANCE NO. i. Consistency with locational criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and application requirements established in this section; j. The effect upon other considerations as deemed necessary by the Department of Community and Economic Development. 2. All applications must meet at least one of the following criteria: a. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan; or b. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council; or c. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies; or d. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of the City Council. 3. Proposals that include a concurrent rezone proposal shall also comply with the decision criteria for a change of zone classification in RMC 4-9-180. G. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD 1. Public Notice of Application: the applicant and the public shall be notified of the application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment at least ten (10) days prior to the first Planning Commission meeting in which the Department of Community and Economic Development reports on the amendment. Notice should consist of at least two (2) of the following methods: mailings to property owners potentially affected by the proposal, posting of at least three (3) notices in the area affected by the proposal, publication in the official newspaper if one 7 ORDINANCE NO. has been designated, or in a newspaper of general circulation if one has not been designated, notice posted on the City's website, or postings at City Hall and public libraries within the City. 2. Notice of Public Hearing before the Planning Commission: the public shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the Planning Commission public hearing with a publication in the official newspaper if one has been designated, or a newspaper of general circulation if one has not been designated. The applicant and any parties of record shall also be sent a notice by mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. 3. Comment period for Planning Commission public hearing: written comments will be accepted for ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing until seven (7) days after the date of the public hearing, unless the comment period is extended by a vote of the Commission. Verbal comments will only be accepted at the time of the hearing. All comments, including those sent by electronic means, must be accompanied by the full name and mailing address of the person making the comment. SECTION IV. Section 4-9-025, Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is herby amended by changing the name to "Title IV Development Regulation Revision and Interpretation Process", and to read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 4-9-025 TITLE IV DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVISION AND INTERPRETATION PROCESS: A. PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe the procedures and review criteria for amendments to, and interpretations of, the Development Regulations, Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code. Code interpretations provide temporary clarification of Title IV. Once an interpretation is issued, the subject will be submitted to the docket for Title IV amendments. B. AUTHORITY In accordance with RCW 36.70A.470, a summary containing written comments on suggested development regulation amendments shall be coordinated by the Department of Community and Economic Development. The text revision process is the means to either suggest a change, or to identify needed corrections, or both, in the development regulations. The Planning Director has the authority to issue Title IV code interpretations. C. APPLICABILITY 1. Proposed Title IV Development Regulation Amendments may be suggested by: a. The Mayor, City Council, or Planning Commission by submitting the request in writing to the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development. 9 ORDINANCE NO. b. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development. c. Private parties by submitting an application to the Department of Community and Economic Development. d. Code interpretations issued by the Planning Director. 2. Any person may submit a written request for code interpretation to the Planning Director, regarding any applicable title or any subsequent amendment thereto. D. REVIEW PROCESS FOR TITLE IV AMENDMENTS 1. Applications for Title IV amendments may be accepted at any time and placed on the Title IV docket. Imperative Title IV amendments designated by the Mayor, City Council, or Planning Commission may be given higher priority and processed outside the annual Title IV process outlined in this section. 2. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall keep a docket of suggested Title IV amendments that includes the following: a. Name and address of the person or agency requesting the amendment, b. Description of the amendment; c. Date of the request; d. Map of the affected area, if appropriate. 3. The Council may review the Title IV docket to determine which applications to include in the Planning Commission's annual work program. 10 ORDINANCE NO. 4. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall conduct its review of Title IV concurrently with Planning Commission review. However, all departmental reporting and evaluation, including necessary environmental review, shall be completed prior to the Planning Commission making recommendations on the amendments. 5. The Planning Commission shall forward a recommendation to the City Council after a public hearing. 6. Title IV amendments shall be adopted by ordinance of the City Council after review by the City Council. E. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR TITLE IV AMENDMENTS 1. All Title IV amendments will be evaluated on their merits based upon the following: a. Consistency and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; and b. All revisions must meet with at least one of the following criteria: (1) The revision eliminates conflicts within the code or between the code and the Comprehensive Plan; or (2) The revision changes code language to provide clarity, consistency, or ease of administration; or (3) The revision directly implements policies of the Comprehensive Plan or City Business Plan; or (4) The revision accommodates new policy directives of the City Council or Administration. 11 ORDINANCE NO. F. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD FOR TITLE IV AMENDMENTS 1. Notice of Public Hearing before the Planning Commission: the public shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the Planning Commission public hearing with a publication in the official newspaper if one has been designated, or a newspaper of general circulation if one has not been designated. The applicant and any parties of record shall also be sent a notice by mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. 2. Comment period for Planning Commission public hearing: written comments will be accepted for ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing until seven ,(7) days after the date of the public hearing, unless the comment period is extended by a vote of the Commission. Verbal comments will only be accepted at the time of the hearing. All comments, including those sent by electronic means, must be accompanied by the full name and mailing address of the person making the comment. G. REVIEW PROCESS FOR TITLE IV CODE INTERPRETATIONS 1. Requests for code interpretations shall include: a. The section of the code that is allegedly ambiguous or needing clarification; b. The subject matter or nature of the request; and c. Any facts that are relevant to the request. 2. The Planning Director may deny or reject the request if there is no ambiguity or need for clarification demonstrated by the requestor. 12 ORDINANCE NO. 3. Only one (1) interpretation per issue shall be rendered by the Planning Director. In the event an interpretation is requested on an issue previously addressed, the Planning Director shall provide a copy of the previous interpretation to satisfy such request. 4. The Planning Director shall post proposed interpretations on the City website for public review comment and possible appeal. 5. Interpretations shall follow the process of Development Regulations amendments and be amended into Title IV annually. SECTION V. Section 4-9-180, Rezone Process, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is herby amended to read as follows: 4-9-180 REZONE PROCESS A. PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe the procedure for processing applications for rezones in the City of Renton. This section addresses both rezones requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezones that do not require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 13 ORDINANCE NO. B. WHO MAY APPLY An application for a rezone of property may be made by the property owner, or somebody authorized on the owner's behalf, on forms provided by and filed with the Department of Community and Economic Development. C. AUTHORITY FOR REZONES REQUIRING A PLAN AMENDMENT In accordance with RCW 35.63.110 the Planning Commission has the authority to recommend zoning to the legislative body requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment after conducting a public hearing thereon. D. AUTHORITY FOR REZONES NOT REQUIRING PLAN AMENDMENT Rezone requests not requiring an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed in an open public hearing held before the Hearing Examiner under the procedures and rules of the Hearing Examiner, as authorized by RCW 35.63.130. The applicant will have the burden and duty of applying for and pursuing the rezone. E. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES Submittal requirements and fees shall be as specified in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees, and 4-8-120C, Land Use Applications. F. DECISION CRITERIA FOR CHANGE OF ZONE CLASSIFICATION 1. Criteria for Rezones Requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment The following findings shall be made: The proposed amendment meets the review criteria in RMC 4-9-020; and 14 ORDINANCE NO. and a. Is consistent with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; b. At least one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The property subject to rezone was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or (2) Since the most recent land use analysis or the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. 2. Criteria for Rezones Not Requiring Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The Reviewing Official shall make the following findings: a. The rezone is in the public interest, and b. The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petitioner, and c. The rezone is not materially detrimental to the public welfare of the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and d. The rezone meets the review criteria in subsection F.1 of this section. G. TIME LIMITATIONS FOR REZONE APPLICATION RESUBMISSION A petition for a change of zoning classification, seeking the same or substantially same relief as a prior petition, cannot be re -filed or resubmitted within a period of twelve (12) months from the date of final disapproval or rejection of such prior petition. 15 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 0 R D :1606:11/ 16/09: sc r Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2009. Denis Law, Mayor 16 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 4-8-08OG LAND USE PERMIT PROCEDURES U Z Q LL Z m O a OUj p �O u O O p W cc O^ O a U � \ Z U W OC Q U V Z_ O C Z_ _Q _Uj CO a O U Z OC W Q H U Z W N Q Q U G a Q Uj cc O i Uj o O U= TYPE IX Development Yes Staff, PC CC GMHB Regulation Text PC Amendments 17 Attachment B ORDINANCE NO. 4-8-08OG LAND USE PERMIT PROCEDURES U O Q O Z O m =a a a Q C Q �= Z O Z O^ Q O 00 a O F- v w U Z V ui ui GC Q a u WZ O_ o aZ =i an d O V Z oC W Q H U Z w N O Q U_ 0 a Q 0. c`uC O x O uJ u x TYPE X4 Comprehensive Yes Staff, PC CC GMHB Plan PC Amendments Rezones Yes Staff, PC CC GMHB Associated with PC Comprehensive Plan Amendments 18 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 567% AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND CHAPTER 6, STREET AND UTILITY STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTOW, TO UPDATE MINIMUM STREET DESIGN STANDARDS WITH COMPLETE STREETS PRINCIPLES TO ENABLE SAFE AND CONVENIENT ACCESS AND TRAVEL FOR ALL USERS, AND TO FOSTER A SENSE OF PLACE IN THE PUBLIC REALM WITH ATTRACTIVE DESIGN AMENITIES. jam- Zo WHEREAS, the goal of the Transportation Element in the Renton Comprehensive Plan is to provide a balanced multi -modal transportation system with various transportation choices such as automobiles, buses, rail, transit, bicycles, and walking, that will serve existing and future residential and employment growth; and WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy states non -motorized transportation modes should be developed in tandem with motorized transportation systems, recognizing safety, user diversity, and experiential diversity; and WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy promotes new developments and attractive, safe, and healthy neighborhoods that are walkable places to live, shop, play, and get to work without having to drive; and WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan promotes and encourages pedestrian and bicycle traffic within all areas of the City and not only as a viable means of transportation, but as an important method for maintaining overall health and fitness of Renton's citizens; and WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy supports pedestrian -oriented environments that address safety as a first priority and the use of a landscape strip along the roadway as a safety buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. and WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy promotes planting trees along streets; WHEREAS, Renton Comprehensive Plan policy encourages residential streets to be constructed to the narrowest widths feasible, curb to curb, without impeding emergency vehicle access; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the Renton Comprehensive Plan, as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-4-0801.3.b, Single Family and Duplex Uses, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: b. Single Family and Duplex Uses: The maximum width of single loaded garage driveways shall not exceed nine feet (9') and double loaded garage driveways shall not exceed sixteen feet (16'). SECTION II. Subsection 4-6-060A, Purpose, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2 ORDINANCE NO. A. PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this section to establish design standards and development requirements for street improvements to insure reasonable and safe access to public and private properties. These improvements include appropriately scaled sidewalks related to the urban context, a range of landscape buffers, curbs, gutters, street paving, monumentation, signage, and lighting, to be developed with complete streets principles. Complete streets principles are to plan, design, and operate streets to enable safe and convenient access and travel for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and people of all ages and abilities, as well as freight and motor vehicle drivers, and to foster a sense of place in the public realm with attractive design amenities. SECTION III. Subsection 4-6-0606, Administering and Enforcing Authority, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: B. ADMINISTERING AND ENFORCING AUTHORITY: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee is responsible for the general administration and coordination of this section. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-6-060C, Applicability, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3 ORDINANCE NO. C. APPLICABILITY: The standards in this section will be used for all public and private street improvements within the City of Renton. Whenever a building permit is applied for or application made for a short plat or a full subdivision, the applicant for such permit and/or application shall build and install certain street improvements, including, but not limited to: lighting on all adjacent right-of- ways, and all private street improvements on access easements. The minimum design standards for streets are listed in the tables set forth in subsection 4-6- 060F.2. These standards will determine specific street improvement requirements for development projects, including short plats and subdivisions. SECTION V. Subsection 4-6-060E.3, Waiver of Dedication, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Waiver of Dedication: The Administrator of the Community and Economic Development and/or designee may waive the requirement for additional right- of-way dedication pursuant to RMC 4-9-250C, Waiver Procedures, where it is determined by the Administrator and/or designee that construction of full street improvements is not anticipated in the future. SECTION VI. Subsection 4-6-060F, Public Street and Sidewalk Design Standards, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby 4 ORDINANCE NO. amended to change the title to "Public Street Right -of -Way Design Standards", and to read as follows. F. PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Level of Improvements: The minimum level of street improvements required are listed in the following tables including but not limited to curbs, planting strips, sidewalks, and lighting.. a. Street Lighting Exemption: No street lighting is required for the following smaller project sizes: 2-4 units for residential; 0-5,000 square feet commercial; or 0-10,000 square feet industrial. b. Additional Walkway Requirement: A pedestrian walkway to the arterial is required for the following larger project sizes with more than: 20 units residential; 10,000 square feet commercial; or 20,000 square feet industrial. 2. Minimum Design Standards for Public Streets and Alleys: All such improvements shall be constructed to the City Standards for Municipal Public Works Construction. Standards for construction shall be as specified in the following table, and by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee. MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS TABLE FOR PUBLIC STREETS AND ALLEYS: Minimum; _ - Desih .Y+ntw �Ka r r 1 ^ e tf " Il�lr. s r' r I tit TZ Standards; =} Functional Classifications Public Streets andlleys� "� t{ 4h a - � km �+. fir'#' s fix. r '��d�a,'Si �- s F_ � _•} q i �.v.- �` ti ,-� �,. �� � � � � V1,� � �, w notes) s �� Principalf Minor.,,} E Commercial'' k Commercial .Residential; 'Limited' '' q�leys `f_ r_ � .a � - `3• r au 1. - S� f. 5 ORDINANCE NO. Arterial �Arterialk , Mixed Use; Mixed Use Access �= Residential 1 �4 I I {S(',I �F 1 r w la.p 1'1 1" (.� a"r � 'Yjti 'Mt'r/.-�" G' i €���J',, 1 !"'fir-� fy p r I� a -i F M _ *�6 - ". 5^ ,F- hd WY '#al r Industrial & 3Y:i1* 5 I.r h3 '.', 9 I.k r&.Industrial 1=x I f. r ;� pi�` �� ,Access 7. aaJ t Isle r r Neighborhood Access a w 3 Collr^eCtor- 4P r = Arterial'TO Structural See Standard Drawing or Pavement section and may be designed using procedures described in Design the WSDOT Design Manual, latest edition. Average Daily 14,000- 3,000- 3,000-14,000 0- 3,000 0- 3,000 0- 250 N/A Vehicle Trips 40,000 20,000 (ADT) Right of Way 4 lanes- 4 lanes- 91' 2 lanes- 83' 2 lane- 69' 2 lanes- 53' 1 lane- 45' Res.- 16' (R-O-W) 91' 5 lanes- 103' 3 lanes- 94' 3 lane- 80' Com.- 16' 5 lanes- 6 lanes- 113' 103' 7 lanes- 125' 6 lanes- 113' 7 lanes- 125' Sidewalks (2) 8' both 8' both - 8' both sides 6' both sides 5' both 5' both None sides (3) sides (3) (3) sides sides Planting 8' 8' between 8' between 8' between 8' between 8' between None Strips (4) between curb & walk curb & walk curb & walk curb & walk curb & walk curb & both sides both sides both sides both sides both sides walk both sides Tree grates and hardscape may be substituted for May be reduced if planting strip area if approved by Reviewing Official. approved by Reviewing Official (5) Street Trees Required, see Street Trees Standards RMC 4-4-070 N/A ORDINANCE NO. Curbs Curb Curb both Curb both Curb both Curb both Curb both None both sides sides sides sides sides sides Parking Lanes Allowed Allowed at 8' both sides 8' both sides 6' one side 6' one side at 8' 8' (6) (6) Bicycle All classifications of Arterials will have None None None N/A Facilities (7) Class I, or Class II, or Class III bicycle facility. Paved 4 lanes- 4 lanes- 54' 2 lanes- 30' 2 lanes- 20' 2 lanes- 20' 1 lane- 12' Res.- 12' Roadway 54' (8) Width, not 5 lanes- 66' 3 lanes- 41' 3 lanes- 31' Com.- including5lanes- 6 lanes- 76' 16' 66' parking 6 lanes- 7 lanes- 88' 76' 7 lanes- 88' Lane Widths 11'travel lanes, 5' bike 10' travel lanes, 10' travel lanes 1 travel Res.- 12' (9) lanes, and 12' center 5' bike lanes, lane- 12' (8) left turn lanes. and 11' center Com.- urn lanes. 16' Center Center median allowed for boulevard N/A Median treatment and center left turn lane. Width will be width of center left turn lane minus 1-foot from thru traffic travel lanes on both sides. Pull-outs with a minimum 25 foot length required for maintenance and emergency vehicles within the median at intervals of 300- 350' Pedestrian Curb bulb -outs required where on -street parking is located. N/A N/A Bulb -outs Intersection 35' 35' turning I 35' turning 25' turning I 25' turning 25' turning N/A ORDINANCE NO. Radii (10) turning radius radius (11) radius (11) radius radius radius At the intersection of two classes of streets, the radius for the higher class street is to be used. Where larger trucks, transit and school buses are anticipated, further design will be required to determine an adequate radius. The minimum curb radius is 15 feet. Cul-de-sacs Limited application per RMC 4-6-060H. Limited application. See N/A RMC 4-6-060H for pavement and R-O-W widths when permitted. Maximum 0.5-8% 0.5-8% 0.5-10% 0.5-15%, greater than 15% only allowed 0.5-15% Grades within approved hillside subdivisions. Site Access Determined 125' from 125' from N/A N/A N/A N/A n a case- intersection intersection by -case basis. Street & Architectural street and pedestrian lighting standards will be established on a case- N/A Pedestrian by -case basis for streets. Street lights above the roadway are required at each Lighting corner of a street intersection only. Pedestrian scale lighting is required between street intersections and at each corner of an intersection. NOTES AND CONDITIONS: MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS TABLE FOR PUBLIC STREETS AND ALLEYS: (1) Minimum design standards may be altered to allow alternative stormwater management and low impact development techniques within the R-O-W by the Department. (2) Sidewalk width will be 12 feet both sides in the City Center Community Planning Area. This sidewalk width includes street tree grates for locating street trees. (3) Sidewalk areas may be required at a wider width to accommodate required multi -use path facilities when a Class I multi -use path is required within a street R-O-W by the Department. The width of a required 5 foot bicycle lane will be transferred to the sidewalk area to create a Class I multi -use path. (4) Maintenance Responsibilities: Unless otherwise agreed upon by the City of Renton, maintenance of landscaping within the planting strip area, including but not limited to elements such as groundcover, turf, softscape, and hardscape, is the responsibility of the ORDINANCE NO. adjacent property owner. Maintenance for street trees within the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the City of Renton. (5) Planting strips may be reduced if one of the following conditions is met: a) when R-O-W acquisition is problematic; or b) when critical areas would be impacted. If approved, a permanent alternative landscaped area should be provided equal or greater than the allowed planting strip area reduction that is in addition to any minimum existing code requirements. (6) A second parking lane may be required by the Reviewing Official. (7) Class II bicycle facilities (bike lanes) included in roadway width for both sides. Bicycle facilities that are shared travel lanes, Class III bicycle facilities, require less roadway width. Class III travel lanes are a minimum of 14 feet. (8) Requirement: Either fire sprinklers shall be provided as approved by Fire & Emergency Services or a clear roadway area shall be provided for emergency vehicles midblock. All of the clear area must be 20 feet in width for vehicular movement with a minimum length of 50 feet and maximum length of 100 feet, so as to provide emergency access to homes within 150 feet. Along the clear area only, the planting strip would not be required and the clear area will be in place of the landscaping area. (9) The City may require different lane width dimensions to address safety concerns or to meet state and federal requirements for state routes or grant funding. (10) Turning radius dimensions represent the vehicle turning path. The smallest curb radius should be used while maintaining the specified turning radius. Lane width and the presence of a bike lane and parking lane affect a vehicle's turning path. On streets with more than one lane in that direction of travel, large vehicles may encroach into no more than one-half of the adjacent travel lane to complete the turn. On Arterials and Collector Arterials, encroachment into oncoming travel lanes is unacceptable. The minimum curb radius is 15 feet. (11) Turning radius for streets which include industrial access may increase to 50 feet. 3. Length of Improvements: Such improvements shall extend the full distance of such property to be improved upon and sought to be occupied as a building site or parking area for the aforesaid building or platting purposes, and which may abut property dedicated as a public street. 9 ORDINANCE NO. 4. Additional Alley Standards: Alleys may be used for vehicular access, but are not to be considered as the primary access for emergency or Fire Department concerns. Alley access is the preferred street pattern except for properties in the Residential Low Density land use designation. Refer to RMC 4- 7-150. 5. Pavement Thickness: New pavement shall be a minimum of four inches (4") of asphalt over six inches (6") of crushed rock. Pavement thickness for new arterial or collector streets or widening of arterials or collector streets must be approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Pavement thickness design shall be based on standard engineering procedures. For the purposes of asphalt pavement design, the procedures described by the "Asphalt Institute's Thickness Design Manual" (latest edition) will be accepted by the Department. Alternate design procedures or materials may be used if approved by the Department through the process listed in RMC 4-9-250E. 6. Minimum Sidewalk Measurements: New sidewalks must provide a minimum of four feet (4') of horizontal clearance from all vertical obstructions. Sidewalk widths include the curb width for those sidewalks constructed abutting or attached to the curb. 7. Curves: a. Horizontal Curves: Where a deflection angle of more than ten degrees (10') in the alignment of a street occurs, a curve of reasonably long radius shall 10 ORDINANCE NO. be introduced, subject to review and approval of the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee. b. Vertical Curves: All changes in grade shall be connected by vertical curves of a minimum length of two hundred feet (200') unless specified otherwise by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee. c. Tangents for Reverse Curves: A tangent of at least two hundred feet (200') in length shall be provided between reverse curves for arterials; one hundred fifty feet (150') for collectors and one hundred feet (100') for residential access streets. 8. City Center Planning Area and Urban Design Districts — Special Standards: Greater sidewalk widths may be required in the City Center Planning Area and Urban Design Districts as part of site plan review for specific projects. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee may require that sidewalks be extended from property line to the curb with provisions made for street trees and other landscaping requirements, street lighting, and fire hydrants. 9. Vehicular Access and Connection Points To and From the State Highway System: a. Chapter 47.50 RCW, Highway Access Management, is hereby adopted by reference to provide for the regulation and control of vehicular access and 11 ORDINANCE NO. connection points of ingress to and egress from the state highway system within the incorporated areas of the City of Renton. b. Pursuant to Chapter 47.50 RCW, the provisions of Chapters 468-51 and 468-52 WAC, together with all future amendments, are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference. c. At least one (1) copy of each law, rule or regulation adopted hereby is on file with the City Clerk and available for inspection by the public. SECTION VII. Subsection of 4-6-060G, Dead End Streets, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Complete Streets", and to read as follows: G. COMPLETE STREETS: 1. Complete Streets: The City of Renton will plan for, design, and construct transportation projects to appropriately provide accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities, and freight and motor vehicles, including the incorporation of such facilities into transportation plans and programs. 2. Exemptions: Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are not required to be established when it is concluded by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee that application of complete streets principles is unnecessary or inappropriate: a. Where their establishment would be contrary to public safety; or 12 ORDINANCE NO. b. When the cost would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use; or or c. Where there is no identified long-term need; or d. Where the establishment would violate Comprehensive Plan policies; e. Where the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee grants a documented exemption which may only be authorized in specific situations where conditions warrant. Such site -specific exemptions shall not constitute general changes to the minimum street standards established in this chapter RMC 4-6-060. SECTION Vill. Subsection 4-6-060H, Alley Standards, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Dead End Streets", and to read as follows: H. DEAD END STREETS: 1. Limited Application: Cul-de-sac and dead end streets are limited in application and may only be permitted by the Reviewing Official where, due to demonstrable physical constraints, no future connection to a larger street pattern is physically possible. 2. Cul-de-Sacs and Turnarounds When Permitted — Minimum Requirements: Minimum standards for dead end streets, if approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development, are as follows: 13 ORDINANCE NO. LENGTH OF STREET TYPE OF TURNAROUND For up to 150' in length No turnaround required. From 150' to 300' in Dedicated hammerhead turnaround or cul-de-sac length required. From 300' to 500' in Cul-de-sac required. length From 500' to 700' in Cul-de-sac required. length Fire sprinkler system required for houses. Longer than 700' in length Two means of access and fire sprinklers required for all houses beyond 500'. 3. Turnaround Design: The hammerhead turnaround shall have a design approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee and Fire and Emergency Services. 4. Cul-de-Sac Design: Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum paved and landscaped radius of forty five feet (45') with a right-of-way radius of fifty five feet (55') for the turnaround. A landscaped center island with a radius of twenty feet (20') delineated by curbing shall be provided in the cul-de-sac. The landscaping shall be maintained by the homeowners' association or adjacent property owners. The cul-de-sac turnaround shall have a design approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee and Fire and Emergency Services. r 5. Secondary Access Requirement: Secondary access for emergency equipment is required when a development of three (3) or more buildings is located more than two hundred feet (200') from a public street. 14 ORDINANCE NO. 6. Waiver of Turnaround: The requirement for a turnaround or cul-de-sac may be waived by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee with approval of Fire and Emergency Services when the development proposal will not create an increased need for emergency operations pursuant to RMC 4-9-250C, Waiver Procedures. SECTION IX. Subsection 4-6-0601, Street Lighting Standards, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Street and Pedestrian Lighting Standards", and to read as follows: I. STREET AND PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING STANDARDS: 1. Lighting Design: Architectural street lighting standards will be established on a case -by -case basis for streets. 2. Lighting Location: Street lighting is only required at street intersections, where each corner of the intersection shall have a street light. Pedestrian lighting for sidewalks and pathways shall be installed between intersections along streets and at intersection corners. 3. Average Maintained Illumination: The street lighting shall be constructed to provide average maintained horizontal illumination as illustrated below. The lighting levels shall be governed by roadway classification and area zoning classification. Values are in horizontal foot-candles at the pavement surface when the light source is at its lowest level. 15 ORDINANCE NO. Commercial - Mixed -Use Industrial Residential Principal Arterial 2.0 2.0 1.0 Minor Arterial 1.4 1.2 0.6 Collector Arterial 1.2 0.9 0.6 Access Street 0.9 0.6 0.2 11 4. Uniformity Ratios: Uniformity ratios for the street lighting shall meet or exceed four to one (4:1) for light levels of 0.6 foot-candles or more and six to one (6:1) for light levels less than 0.6 foot-candles. 5. Construction Standards: Street lighting systems shall. be designed and constructed in accordance with the City publication, "Guidelines and Standards for Street Lighting Design of Residential and Arterial Streets". SECTION X. Subsection 4-6-060J, Private Streets, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: J. PRIVATE STREETS: 1. When Permitted: Private streets are allowed for access to six (6) or fewer lots, provided at least two (2) of the six (6) lots abut a public right-of-way. Private streets will only be permitted if a public street is not anticipated by the Department of Community and Economic Development to be necessary for existing or future traffic and/or pedestrian circulation through the subdivision or to serve adjacent property. 16 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Minimum Standards: Such private streets shall consist of a minimum of a twenty six-foot (26') easement with a twelve -foot (12') pavement width. The private street shall provide a turnaround meeting the minimum requirements of this Chapter. No sidewalks are required for private streets; however, drainage improvements per City Code are required, as well as an approved pavement thickness (minimum of four inches (4") asphalt over six inches (6") crushed rock). The maximum grade for the private street shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%), except for within approved hillside subdivisions. The land area included in private street easements shall not be included in the required minimum lot area for purposes of subdivision. 3. Signage Required: Appurtenant traffic control devices including installation of traffic and street name signs, as required by the Department of Community and Economic Development, shall be provided by the subdivider. The street name signs will include a sign labeled "Private Street". 4. Easement Required: An easement will be required to create the private street. 5. Timing of Improvements: The private street must be installed prior to recording of the plat unless deferred. SECTION XI. Subsection 4-6-060K, Shared Driveways, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Shared Driveways — When Permitted", and to read as follows: 17 ORDINANCE NO. K. SHARED DRIVEWAYS —WHEN PERMITTED: A shared private driveway may be permitted for access up to a maximum of four (4) lots. Up to three (3) of the lots may use the driveway as primary access for emergencies. The remainder of the lots must have physical frontage along a street for primary and emergency access and shall only be allowed vehicular access from the shared private driveway. The private access easement shall be a minimum of sixteen feet (16') in width, with a maximum of twelve feet (12') paved driveway. Minimum turnaround requirements for emergency access to lots can be found in RMC 4-6-060H. SECTION XII. Subsection 4-6-060L, Timing For Installation of Improvements, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: L. TIMING FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS: No building shall be granted a certificate of final occupancy, or plat or short plat recorded, until all the required street improvements are constructed in a satisfactory manner and approved by the responsible departments unless those improvements remaining unconstructed have been deferred by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee and security for such unconstructed improvements has been satisfactorily posted. ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XI11. Subsection 4-6-060N, Review of Construction Plans, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: N. REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS: 1. Submittal: All street improvement plans prepared shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Community and Economic Development. All plans and specifications for such improvements are to be submitted at the time application for a building permit is made or, for plats, prior to construction (street/utility) permit issuance. 2. Fees and Submittal Requirements: All permits required for the construction of these improvements shall be applied for and obtained in the same manner and same conditions as specified in Chapter 9-10 RMC, relating to excavating or disturbing streets, alleys, pavement or improvements. Fees shall be as stipulated in RMC 4-1-180. Money derived from the above charges shall be deposited to the General Fund. Half of the fee is due and payable upon submittal for a construction permit application, and the remainder is due and payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 3. Cost Estimate Required: The applicant will be required to submit a cost estimate for the improvements. This will be reviewed by the Department of Community and Economic Development for accuracy. 19 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIV. Subsection 4-6-0600, Variations From Standards, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: Q. VARIATIONS FROM STANDARDS: 1. Alternates, Modifications, Waivers, Variances: See RMC 4-9-250. a. When Permitted: Half street improvements may be allowed for a residential access street by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee when it is determined that the adjacent parcel of property has the potential for future development and dedication of the right-of-way necessary for the completion of the street right- of-way. b. Minimum Design Standards: The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet (35') with twenty feet (20') paved. A curb, planting strip area, and sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street according to the minimum design standards for public streets. If the street is permitted a cul-de-sac, then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated, with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The property shall also dedicate easements to the City for street lighting and fire hydrants. Additional easements shall be provided for the franchise utilities outside of the dedicated right-of-way. 20 ORDINANCE NO. c. Standards for Completion of the Half Street: When the adjacent parcel is platted or developed, the additional right-of-way width needed to complete the type of street classification shall be dedicated from the developing property. The pavement shall then be widened to the width needed to complete the type of street classification, curb, planting strip, and sidewalk shall be installed on the developing side of the street. If the street is a dead end street requiring a cul-de- sac, then the developing parcel shall dedicate the remainder of the right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and construct the final complete cul-de-sac, including curb, sidewalk, and other required improvements. SECTION XV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1607:11/20/09 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of 12009. Denis Law, Mayor 21 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. i2e.-�) (.:�> ed t f(e 1-5 �- y-e-adcpe5 /z(7/& azo�� /aiya9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS, CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 9, PERMITS — SPECIFIC, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE REGULATIONS REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.IN THE R-4, R-8, R-10 AND R-14 ZONES. WHEREAS, the City seeks to encourage the development of quality residential development of varied housing types for a population diverse in age, income, and lifestyle; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to set standards which ensure that new development occurs in a manner that creates a high quality of life for existing and new residents; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to ensure that as density increases, aspects of architectural and site design increase to ensure that density is accommodated in a manner that benefits both existing and new residents; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-10013, Tables, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 ORDINANCE NO. B. TABLES: There are four (4) separate tables dealing with the following general land use categories and zones: RESIDENTIAL (RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14, RM) COMMERCIAL (CN, CV, CA) COMMERCIAL (CD, CO, COR) INDUSTRIAL (IL, IM, IH) SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-100C, Interpretation of Tables, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: C. INTERPRETATION OF TABLES: Development standards are listed under each applicable heading and the zones are listed at the left of each standard. The table cells contain the minimum and, in some cases, maximum requirements of the zone. The small numbers (superscript) in a cell indicate additional requirements or detailed information which is not able to fit in the table format. A blank cell indicates there are no specific requirements. SECTION Ill. Subsection 4-2-110A, Development Standards for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby 2 ORDINANCE NO. amended to change the title to "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures)", and to read as shown in Attachment A. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-2-110B, Development Standards for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations (Detached Accessory Structures), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Development Standards for Residential Development (Detached Accessory Buildings)", and to read as shown in Attachment B. SECTION V. Subsection 4-2-110D, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Residential Zoning Designations". SECTION VI. Subsection 4-2-110D.1.a of subsection 4-2-110D, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. a. Phasing, shadow platting, or land reserves may be used to satisfy the minimum density requirements if the applicant can demonstrate that the current development would not preclude the provision of adequate access and 3 ORDINANCE NO. infrastructure to future development and would allow for the eventual satisfaction of minimum density requirements through future development. Within the Urban Center, surface parking may be considered a land reserve. SECTION VII. Subsection 4-2-110D.4, Allowed Projections into Setbacks, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Allowed Projections into Setbacks: a. Fireplace Structures, Windows: Fireplace structures, bay or garden windows, enclosed stair landings, and similar structures as determined by the Zoning Administrator may project twenty four inches (24") into any setback; provided, such projections are: (i) Limited to two (2) per facade. (ii) Not wider than 10'. b. Fences: Rockeries and retaining walls with a height of forty eight inches (48") or less may be constructed within any required setback; provided, that they are located outside of the twenty foot (20') clear vision area specified in RMC 4-11-030, definition of "clear vision area". See RMC 4-4-040. c. Steps and Decks: Uncovered steps and decks not exceeding eighteen inches (18") above the finished grade may project to any property line. Uncovered steps and decks having no roof covering and not exceeding forty two inches (42") high may be built within the front yard setback. 4 ORDINANCE NO. d. Eaves: Eaves and cornices: may project up to twenty four inches (24") into any required setback. e. Porches and Stoops: may project into front setbacks up to eight feet (8') and into side setbacks along a street up to five feet (5'). SECTION VI11. Subsection 4-2-110D.7 subsection 4-2-110D, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. For pre-existing legal lots having less than the minimum lot width required by this Section, the following chart shall apply for determining the required minimum side yard width along a street: WIDTH OF EXISTING, LEGAL LOT MINIMUM SIDE YARD WIDTH ALONG A STREET RC ZONE 150 feet or less 25 ft. R-1 ZONE Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10 ft. 50.1 to 51 ft. 11 ft. 51.1 to 52 ft. 12 ft. 52.1 to 53 ft. 13 ft. 53.1 to 54 ft. 14 ft. 54.1 to 55 ft. 15 ft. 55.1 to 56 ft. 16 ft. 56.1 to 57 ft. 17 ft. 57.1 to 58 ft. 18 ft. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 58.1 to 59 ft. 19 ft. 59.1 and greater 20 ft. R-4 or R-8 ZONE Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10 ft. 50.1 to 52 ft. 11 ft. 52.1 to 54 ft. 12 ft. 54.1 to 56 ft. 13 ft. 56.1 to 58 ft. 14 ft. 58.1 or greater 15 ft. SECTION IX. Subsection 4-2-110D, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add new subsections numbered 18 — 31, to read as follows: 18. Front and rear setbacks in the RM-U Zone may be reduced to zero feet (0') by the Reviewing Official during the site development plan review process provided the applicant demonstrates that the project will provide a compensatory amenity such as an entryway courtyard, private balconies or enhanced landscaping. 19. If the structure located in the RM-U Zone exceeds forty feet (40') in height, a fifteen foot (15') front setback from the property line shall be required of all portions of the structure which exceed forty feet (40'). This requirement may be modified by the Reviewing Official during the site development plan review process to a uniform five-foot (5') front setback for the entire structure; provided, that the structure provides a textured or varied facade (e.g., multiple 0 ORDINANCE NO. setbacks, brickwork and/or ornamentation) and consideration of the pedestrian environment (e.g., extra sidewalk width, canopies, enhanced landscaping). 20. In the V District, an additional ten feet (10') height for a residential dwelling structure may be obtained through the provision of additional amenities such as pitched roofs, additional recreation facilities, underground parking, and additional landscaped open space areas; as determined through the site development plan review process and depending on the compatibility of the proposed buildings with adjacent existing residential development. In no case shall the height of a residential structure exceed forty five feet (45'). 21. The Reviewing Official may modify this provision, through the site development plan review process, where it is determined that specific portions of the required landscaping strip may be developed and maintained as a usable public open space with an opening directly to a public entrance. 22. The Reviewing Official may permit, through the site development plan review process, the substitution for the fifteen foot (15') wide landscaping strip, of a ten foot (10') wide landscaped setback and a sight -obscuring solid barrier wall (e.g., landscaping or solid fence), in order to provide reasonable access to the property. The solid barrier wall shall be designed in accord with the site development plan review section and shall be located a minimum of five feet (5') from abutting property(ies) zoned and /or designated for "residential" use. The Reviewing Official may also modify the sight -obscuring landscaping provision, 7 r ORDINANCE NO. through the site development plan review process, if necessary to provide reasonable access to the property. A secured maintenance agreement or easement for the landscape strip is required. 23. Setbacks shall be measured consistent with the "yard requirement" in chapter 4-11 RMC, except in the case of "shadow lots," setbacks shall be measured from the "shadow lot lines" in the same manner as a conventionally subdivided lot. 24. For self storage uses, rear and side yard setbacks shall comply with the Commercial Arterial Zone (CA) development regulations in RMC 4-2-120A, Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations. 25. For RM-U properties, perimeter street landscape strips may utilize a mix of hard surfaces, brick, stone, textured/colored concrete, and natural landscape elements, groundcover, shrubs and trees, to provide a transition between the public streetscape and the private development, subject to site plan review, RMC 4-9-200131, and the general and additional review criteria of RMC 4-9-200E1 and F1, F2, and F7. In no case shall living plant material comprise less than thirty percent (30%) of the required perimeter landscape strip. 26. Density bonus may allow up to one hundred (100) dwelling units per acre within the RM-U Zone located within the Urban Center Design Overlay and north of South 2nd Street pursuant to requirements in the RMC 4-9-065. 27. See RMC 4-3-100, Urban Design Regulations. LV ORDINANCE NO. 28. For lots created after November 10, 2004. 29. For lots created after July 11, 1993. 30. Minimum density requirements shall not apply to the renovation or conversion of an existing structure. Additionally, in the R-1 zone only, minimum density requirements shall not apply to the subdivision or development of a legal lot % gross acre or less in size as of March 1, 1995. 31. In order to meet the variation requirements of RMC 4-2-115, lot dimensions and setbacks are allowed to be decreased and/or increased, . provided that when averaged the applicable lots standards of the zone are met. SECTION X. Subsection 4-2-110E, Illustrations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to place the drawing titled Residential Multi -Family found in Section 4-2-1101 at the end of the section. SECTION XI. Subsection 4-2-110F, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. SECTION XII. Subsection 4-2-110G, Development Standards for Multifamily Residential Zoning Designations (Detached Accessory Buildings) of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. 9 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIII. Subsection 4-2-110H, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Multi -Family Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. SECTION XVI. Subsection 4-2-1101, Illustrations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. SECTION XV. Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new section numbered 4-2-115, titled "Residential Design and Open Space Standards", to read as follows: 4-2-115 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND OPEN SPACE STANDARDS A. PURPOSE: 1. These Residential Design and Open Space Standards are conceived to implement policies established in the Land Use and Community Design Elements of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, enhance quality of life by encouraging new residential development to produce beautiful neighborhoods of well designed homes, and to mitigate the impacts of density for the neighborhood and the surrounding community. These standards are divided into three areas: a. Site Design: Quality neighborhoods are characterized by well landscaped, safe, pedestrian oriented streets fronted by a variety of housing types. These qualities are enhanced by lots in a variety of sizes and widths and 10 ORDINANCE NO. by homes which vary in scale and massing, each with a prominent entry and generous fenestration facing the street. Garages, while a necessity to today's lifestyles, should not visually dominate the streetscape. b. Open Space: In order to provide residents with a livable community, private and public open space shall be provided. Public open spaces shall be located so that a hierarchy and/or variety of open spaces throughout the neighborhood is created. c. Residential Design: Key characteristics of attractive neighborhoods include variety of housing architectural styles, enhanced by attention to selection of exterior materials, colors, and architectural detailing. 2. This Section lists elements that are required to be included in all residential development in the zones stated in 4-2-115.B.1. Each element includes both standards, as well as guidelines. In order to provide predictability, standards are provided. These standards specify a prescriptive manner in which the requirement can be met. In order to provide flexibility, guidelines are also stated for each element. These guidelines provide direction for those who seek to meet the required element in a manner that is different from the standards. a. The determination as to the satisfaction of the requirement through the use of the guidelines is to be made by the Reviewing Official. b. When the Reviewing Official has determined that the proposed manner of meeting the design requirement through guidelines is sufficient, the applicant shall have satisfied that design requirement. 11 ORDINANCE NO. B. APPLICABILITY: This Section shall apply to all new dwelling units in the following zones: Resource Conservation (RC), Residential One Dwelling Unit per Acre (R-1), Residential Four Dwelling Units per Acre (R-4), Residential Eight Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8), Residential Ten Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10), and Residential Fourteen Dwelling Units per Acre (R-14). The standards of the Site Design subsection are required at the time of subdivision application. The standards of Residential Design subsection are required at the time of application for building permits: The standards of Residential Design are required for the building for which the building permit is being issued. C. EXEMPTIONS: The design regulations shall not apply to interior remodels of existing buildings or structures provided the alterations do not modify the building facade. D. CONFLICTS: Where there are conflicts between the design regulations of this Section and other sections of the Renton Municipal Code, the regulations of this Section shall prevail. E. ADMINISTRATION: 1. Review Process: Applications subject to these design regulations shall be processed as a component of the governing land use process. 12 ORDINANCE NO. Village (CV) shall comprise District V. Areas within the Center Village Land Use Designation zoned Residential Multi -Family (RMF) shall be in District'E'. b. Big Box Retail: This Section shall also apply to big -box retail use. In the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, big -box retail uses are subject to compliance with design regulations applicable to District 'D', except in the Employment Area — Valley (EAV) south of Interstate 405, where big -box retail uses must comply with design standards and guidelines specific to the Urban Center — North (District 'C'). Big -box retail uses in the EAV south of Interstate 405 outside of the CA zone are not subject to Urban Design Regulations. c. CA Zone: This Section shall also apply to all development in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. For the purposes of the design regulations, the zone shall be in District V. 2. Conflicts: Where there are conflicts between the design regulations of this Section and other sections of the Renton Municipal Code, the regulations of this Section shall prevail. Where there are conflicts between the map in subsection B7 of this Section and the text in this Section, the text shall prevail. 3. Urban Design Districts Map: [The Urban Design Districts Map is attached to this ordinance as Attachment D.) SECTION XVII. Subsection 4-4-040D.1.a, Front Yard Setbacks, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 14 ORDINANCE NO. a. Front Yard Setbacks: Fences, walls or hedges a maximum of forty eight inches (48") in height may be allowed within the required front yard subject to these provisions, except that in the R-10 or R-14 zone, fences in the front yard shall be a maximum of thirty six inches (36"). SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4-4-040D.2, Height Limitations for Corner Lots, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Height Limitations for Corner Lots: a. Front Yard Setbacks: Fences, walls or hedges a maximum of forty two inches (42") in height may be allowed on any part of the clear vision area. Fences, walls, or hedges a maximum of forty eight inches (48") in height may be allowed within any part of the front yard setback when located outside of any clear vision area on said lot, except that in the R-10 or R-14 zone, fences in the front yard shall be a maximum of thirty six inches (36"). b. Interior Side Lot Line: Fences, walls or hedges a maximum of seventy two inches (72") in height may be located on interior side lot lines to the point where they intersect the required front yard setback, in which case they shall be governed by subsection D2a of this Section. c. Side Lot Line Abutting Street: Fences, walls or hedges a maximum of forty two inches (42") in height within any clear vision area and forty eight inches (48") in height elsewhere, except that in the R-10 and R-14 zones, the maximum 15 ORDINANCE NO. height of the first fifteen feet (15') of the fencing as measured from the front fagade shall be a maximum thirty six inches (36") in height. The remainder of the fence or hedge shall be a maximum seventy two inches (72") in height. d. Rear Lot Line: Fences, walls, or hedges a maximum of seventy two inches (72") in height may be located along the rear lot line except the fence shall be limited to forty eight inches (48") in height where they intersect the width of the required side yard setback of the side street and where the fence abuts the front yard of. an interior lot. 7-. M" M1 E01t r SECTION XIX. Subsection 4-4-040D, Standards for Residential Uses, of Chapter 4 City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add three new subsections numbered 5 — 7, to read as follows: 5. Location of Fences in the R-10 and R-14 zones: fences shall be located a minimum of one foot (1') from the parcel line to allow for plantings. 16 ORDINANCE NO. 4. Compliance with Zone Standards Required: See specific zone requirements listed in chapter 4-2 RMC and in this section. SECTION XXII. Section 4-4-070, Landscaping, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection lettered F, titled "Additional Landscape Requirements for Residential Development in the R-10 and R-14 Zones", to read as shown below. The current subsections F through K shall be re -lettered accordingly. F. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE R-10 AND R-14 ZONES: 1. Landscaping, planting, and retention of vegetation shall be provided in order to enhance the visual appearance of the neighborhood, preserve natural wooded character, promote utilization of natural systems, and reduce development impacts to natural or existing storm drainage systems and water resources. 2. The standards portion of this subsection specifies a prescriptive manner to meet the landscaping requirements. The guideline portion of this subsection provides direction for those who seek to meet the required design element in a manner that is different from the standards. The determination as to the satisfaction of the requirement through the use of the guidelines is to be made by the Reviewing Official. 18 ORDINANCE NO. 3. Guideline: Landscaping shall be provided to public and privates spaces in order to create a transition between homes and the street while mitigating the impact of densely built housing. 4. Standards: a. Planting Calculation and Installation: L If the calculation of the number of plantings results in a fraction of .5 or greater, the applicant shall round up to the next whole number. If the calculation of the number of plantings results in a fraction of .4 or less, the applicant shall round down to the next whole number. Preserved trees may be used to meet the tree requirements in the planting calculations. permitted. ii. Noxious weeds, as defined by RCW 17.10.010(1), are not iii. All shrubs and perennial plants shall be in beds that include a layer that is at least 2 inches in depth of mulch. iv. Ornamental and canopy trees shall include a mulch ring that has a depth of at least 2 inches and is at least 5 feet in radius, measured from the base of the tree. b. Common Open Space and Parks shall be planted with plants and trees that reflect the architectural character and intended use of the open space. A pathway that is at least 3 feet in width shall connect common areas to each other, to neighborhood streets, access lanes, and/or other pedestrian connections. They shall include: 19 ORDINANCE NO. i. One 2-inch caliper shade or ornamental tree planted for every 1,000 square feet. ii. Shade trees shall be located adjacent to play structures and at other elements in the park, such as sports courts and benches. iii. For common open space, sidewalks or pathways shall be located at the edge of the green, to allow for larger usable open space and easy access to the homes. iv. For common greens, the minimum lawn coverage shall be 50 percent. c. Pedestrian Easements shall be planted with plants and trees. Trees are required along all pedestrian easements to provide shade. Shrubs shall be planted in at least 15 percent of the easement space. i. Trees shall be a minimum 2-inch caliper, of a species that is approved by the City of Renton, spaced forty feet (40') on center, and placed so as to not block sight distance or create a safety concern. ii. Shrubs shall be spaced no further than thirty-six inches (36") on center. If native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 2-gallon size and if non- native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 3-gallon size. d. Front yards: Each unit that has a front yard setback that is 15 feet or greater shall have one front yard tree that is at least 2-inch caliper or a height of eight feet (8'). Any portion of a foundation facing a public space shall be planted with shrubs so that there is a continuous row of shrubs with a maximum spacing 20 ORDINANCE NO. of three feet (3') on center abutting the foundation. If native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 2-gallon size and if non-native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 3-gallon size. e. Side yards along public space shall be planted with shrubs along any fences that face a street or public spaces. Shrubs shall be in a continuous row having a maximum spacing of 3 feet on center. If native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 2-gallon size and if non-native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 3-gallon size. f. Rear yards shall include one tree that is at least 2-inch caliper or a height of eight feet (8") shall be planted a minimum five feet (5') from the property line. Also, shrubs, trees, or vines shall be planted along any fences that face a street or public spaces. Shrubs shall be in a continuous row having a maximum spacing of three feet (3') on center. If native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 2-gallon size and if non-native shrubs are used they shall be at least a 3-gallon size. g. Alleyways shall have the space between an alleyway and fence landscaped with native and drought tolerant shrubs, ground cover, and upright trees, where space and layout allow. h. Utility areas shall be landscaped to minimize their appearance, transformers and other utilities with a three feet (3') high, continuous vegetated screen, except in areas where access is required. Plants shall be evergreen. 21 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXIII. Subsection 4-4-075A, Purpose, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: The purpose of these regulations is to provide for ample, but not excessive illumination levels, promote the general public health, welfare, and safety, to discourage light trespass beyond the boundaries of the property on which the light is located, as well as, to accent key architectural elements and landscape features. SECTION XXIV. Section 4-4-075, Lighting, Exterior On -site, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection lettered F, titled "Specific Requirements for Residential Development in the R-10 and R-14 Zones", to read as shown below. The current subsections F, G and H, should be re -lettered accordingly. F. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE R-10 , AND R-14 ZONES: 1. Exterior lighting shall be provided in order to enhance visibility and security while accenting key architectural elements and landscape features. 2. The standards portion of this subsection specify a prescriptive manner in which the landscaping requirement can be met. The guideline portion of this subsection provides direction for those who seek to meet the required design 22 ORDINANCE NO. element in a manner that is different from the standards. The determination as to the satisfaction of the requirement through the use of the guidelines is to be made by the Reviewing Official. 3. Guidelines: Lighting that is appropriate to the architectural character of the neighborhood and of a human scale shall be provided. Lighting shall be minimal where possible to achieve the desired purpose. Light spillover for all lighting, as well as, single source lighting of large areas shall be avoided. 4. Standards: a. Lighting shall be limited to illumination of surfaces intended for pedestrians, vehicles, or key architectural features. b. Street lighting on residential access streets and limited residential access streets is required. Lighting facilities and fixtures shall be located outside public right-of-way unless owned, operated and maintained by a power utility franchise. Street lights shall be no taller than 16 feet and placed at regular intervals of no more than 200 feet on internal roadways and installed in accordance with chapter 6 of Title IV. c. Lighting for residential access streets, limited residential access streets, alleyways, common greens, and parks shall be low intensity. Lighting for common greens and parks shall be downlighting. d. All exterior house lighting shall be downlighting or placed beneath building eaves to prevent light projecting upward. 23 ORDINANCE NO. e. If alley lights are mounted on a garage, they shall be no higher than 8 feet above ground and directed away from adjacent backyards and structures. f. Sidewalks and pathways not otherwise illuminated by street lighting shall be lit with ornamental downlighting fixtures that shall not exceed 12 feet in height. SECTION XXV. Subsection 4-4-080E.2.a, When Permitted, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. When Permitted: i. If sufficient parking is not available on the premises of the use, a private parking area may be provided off -site, except for single and two (2) family dwellings in the RC, R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones. ii. In the R-10 and R-14 zones, shared parking garages are allowed provided the design standards of RMC 4-2-115 are met. iii. Guest parking associated with single-family and attached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zones is also permitted to be provided offsite provided it meets the following criteria: (1) Parking is located on the neighborhood streets or in a parking court accessed by a public roadway, but not located more than 160 ft from the home it is intended to serve. 24 ORDINANCE NO. (2) Parking is not located in a limited residential access lane right- of-way, except for perpendicular parking associated with private driveways or alleyways. (3) Parking may be accommodated in a tandem driveway space, provided it is not accessed by a private alleyway. SECTION XXVI. Subsection 4-4-080F.10.e, Parking Spaces Required Based on Land Use, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to insert a new row in the section titled "Residential Uses Outside the Center Downtown Zone" The new row shall be titled "Detached and attached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zones", and to read as follows: Detached and attached For units larger than 1,600 sq ft in size, 2 garage dwellings in the R-10 and R- stalls per unit plus one guest stall. 14 zones: For units smaller than 1,600 sq ft in size, 1 garage stall per unit plus one guest stall. SECTION XXVII. Subsection 4-9-065D, Bonus Allowances and Review Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the R-14 zone column of the table reads as shown in Attachment E. SECTION XXVIII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. 25 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1614:11/24/09 Denis Law, Mayor 26 Attachment A 4-2-11OA Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures) DENSITY'(Net Density in Dwellp ing Units er:NetAcre) g, Minimum Density (for proposed short plats or subdivisions 1, z,15 RC, R-1, and R-4 none R-8 4 dwelling units per net acre. R-10 For parcels over % gross acre: 4 dwelling units per net acre 30 R-14 10 dwelling units per net acre 30 For any subdivision, and/or development: 30 "U" suffix27: 25 dwelling units per net acre. RM "T" suffix 27:14 dwelling units per net acre. "F" suffix: 10 dwelling units per net acre. Maximum Density z, ia, is RC 1 dwelling unit per 10 net acres. 1 dwelling unit per 1 net acre, except that in designated Urban Separators density of up to 1 unit per gross acre may be permitted subject R-1 to conditions in RMC 4-3-110, Urban Separator Overlay. Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the maximum density may be allowed subject to conditions of RMC 4-9-065. R-4 4 dwelling units per 1 net acre.13 R-8 8 dwelling units per 1 net acre 10 dwelling units per net acre. R-10 Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the maximum density may be allowed subject to conditions of RMC 4-9-065. 14 dwelling units per net acre, except that density of up to 18 dwelling units per acre may be permitted subject to conditions in RMC 4-9- 065, Density Bonus Review. R-14 Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the maximum density may be allowed subject to conditions of RMC 4-9-065. Affordable housing bonus: Up to 30 dwelling units per acre may be permitted on parcels a minimum of two acres in size if 50% or more of the proposed dwelling units are affordable to low income households with incomes at or below 50% of the area median income. RM "U" suffix: 75 dwelling units per net acre. 26,27 Attachment A "T" suffix: 35 dwelling units per net acre. "F" suffix: 20 dwelling units per net acre. Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the maximum density may be allowed subject to conditions of RMC 4-9-065. NUMBER O DWELLING'UNITS;PE�t Maximum Number per legal lot 2 RC, R1, R- 4, and 1 dwelling with 1 accessory dwelling unit. R-8 R-10 and Detached single-family dwellings: 1 dwelling with 1 accessory dwelling unit. R-14 Multi -family dwellings: n/a R M n/a LV;1=WIIY1,61rJIW1YJ;-_,rx 3 � °`' Minimum Lot Size RC28 10 acres R-128 1 acre 10,000 sq. ft. for cluster development. 3 R-428 8,000 sq. ft.11, 13, except for small lot clusters 10 where R-8 standards shall apply. R 828 4,500 sq. ft. for parcels greater than 1 acre. 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels 1 acre or less R-10 and No minimum lot size. However, small lot developments of greater than 9 single-family dwellings shall incorporate a variety of home R-1429 sizes, lot sizes, and unit clusters. RM n/a Minimum Lot Width RC28 150 ft. for interior lots. 175 ft. for corner lots. 75 ft. for interior lots. R-128 85 ft. for corner lots. Except for clustered development within designated Urban Separators, R-4 standards shall apply for both interior and corner lots. 28 70 ft. for interior lots. R-4 80 ft. for corner lots. 11,13 Attachment A :::� Excep�for all lot clusters 10 where R-8 standards shall apply. 28 50 ft. for interior lots. R-8 60 ft. for corner lots. R-10 and No minimum lot width. R-14 RM29 "T" Suffix: 14 ft. All other suffixes: 50 ft. Minimum Lot Depth RC28 200 ft. R-128 85 ft. R-428 80 ft 11, 13, except for small lot clusters 10 where R-8 standards shall apply. R-828 65ft R-10 and No minimum lot depth R-14 RM29 65 ft. Lot Configuration R-8, R- 10, and See RMC 4-2-115 R14 i ✓ .. a r � n SETBACKS Guidelines for R-10 and R-14: Building setbacks shal l ensure separation of homes and private spaces while allowing high density. Visual functional continuity shall be maintained between housing units through similar setbacks and/or landscape buffers. Structures and parking areas may encroach into required setbacks if it can be shown that such encroachment allows significant trees or tree clusters to be retained. Encroachment shall be the minimum encroachment necessary to protect specified trees. In no case shall the yard be reduced to 50% or more of the required setback. Minimum Front Yard RC and 30 ft. 6 R-1 Attachment A 30 ft. 6,12,13 ,except for small lot clusters 10 where R-8 standards shall apply. R-4 Unit with Alley Access Garage: The front yard setback of the primary structure may be reduced to 20 ft if all parking is provided in the rear yard of the lot with access from a public right-of-way or alley. 15ft. 6 R-8 Unit with Alley Access Garage: The front yard setback of the primary structure may be reduced to 10 ft if all parking is provided in the rear yard of the lot with access from a public right-of-way or alley. On a Residential Access Street: 8 ft to building, 5 ft to porch, or 7 ft to a stoop. There shall be an 18 ft setback from the face of the R-10 garage to the back of the curb and/or to any sidewalk or pathway. and On a Limited Residential Access Street: 0 ft to building, 5 ft to porch, or 7 ft to a stoop. There shall be an 18 ft setback from the face of R-14 the garage to the back of the curb and/or to any sidewalk or pathway. On a Pedestrian Easement or Common Open Space: 4 ft to the building, or 1 ft to porch or stoop. "U" suffix: 5 ft. 18,19 RM "T" suffix: 5 ft. "F" suffix: 20 ft. Minimum Side Yard RC 25 ft. R-1 15 ft. R-4 15 combined ft. 12, 13 is allowed with a minimum of 5 ft. for any side yard. 5 ft is allowed in small lot clusters 10 R-8 5 ft. R-10 Detached Units: 4 ft, except when located on a corner lot then, 8 ft. with an 18 ft. setback from the face of the garage to the back of the and curb and/or to any sidewalk or pathway. R-14 Attached Units: 4 ft. for the unattached side(s) of the structure. 0 ft. for the attached side(s). 23 "T" suffix —Attached Units: A minimum of 3 ft. for the unattached side(s) of the structure. Oft. for the attached side(s). Standard Minimum Setbacks for all other suffixes: Minimum setbacks for side yards: 24 Lot width: less than or equal to 50 ft. — Yard setback: 5 ft. RM Lot width: 50.1 to 60 ft. — Yard setback: 6 ft. Lot width: 60.1 to 70 ft. — Yard setback: 7 ft. Lot width: 70.1 to 80 ft. — Yard setback: 8 ft. Lot width: 80.1 to 90 ft. — Yard setback: 9 ft. Attachment A Lot width 90.1 to 100 ft. — Yard setback: 10 ft. Lot width 100.1 to 110 ft. — Yard setback: 11 ft. Lot width: 110.1+ ft. —Yard setback: 12 ft. Additional setbacks for structures greater than 30 ft in elevation: The entire structure shall be set back an additional 1 ft. for each 10 ft. in excess of 30 ft. to a maximum cumulative setback of 20 ft. Lots abutting Single Family Residential Zones RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, and R-10: 25 ft. along the abutting side(s) of the property. Side Yard Along a Street RC 30 ft. 7 R-1 20 ft. 7 R-4 20 ft 1z,13, except 15 ft. is allowed in small lot clusters 10 R-8 15 ft 7 for the primary structure R-10 and n/a R-14 "U" and "T" suffixes and on all previously existing platted lots which are 50 ft. or less in width: 10 ft. RM All other suffixes with lots over 50 ft. in width: 20 ft. Minimum Rear Yard RC 35 ft. R-1 25 ft. R-4 25 ft. 13, except 20 ft. is allowed in small lot clusters. 10 R-8 20 ft. R-10 and 12 ft., except when rear yard is abutting a common open space then, 4 ft. R-14 "U" suffix: 5 ft., 18, 19 unless lot abuts an RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, or R-10 zone, then 25 ft. RM "T" suffix: 5 ft. "F" suffix: 15 ft. Minimum Freeway Frontage Setback RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, 10 ft. landscaped setback from the street property line. R-10, and R-14 Attachment A Clear vision Area RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, In no case shall a structure over 42 in. in height intrude into the 20 ft. clear vision area defined in RMC 4-11-030. R-10, and R-14 Reciprocal Use Easements RC, R-1, R-4, and n/a R-8 In order to allow for opportunities that maximize space, reciprocal use easements are allowed. If used, all of the following is required: 1. Reciprocal side and/or rear yard use easements shall be delineated on the site plan. R-10 and 2. Residential walls facing a reciprocal side yard shall not have any windows within 5 feet of ground level or doors entering into the R-14 yard space of the abutting home. 3. The design of use easements should not negatively affect the building foundations. 4. The layout of each home should be such that privacy is maintained between abutting houses. RM n/a BUILDING STANDARDS ¢,¢ ;M e : g = z Maximum " designation and public water system facilities 8,9 Building Height, except for uses having a Public Suffix (P) RC, R-1. R-41 30 ft. R-8, and R-10 Residential and Civic Uses: 30 ft. R-14 Commercial Uses: 20 ft. "U" suffix: 50 ft. RM "T" suffix: 35 ft. 'P' suffix: 35 ft.20 Maximum Height for Wireless Communication Facilities RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, See RMC 4-4-14OG R-10, and R-14 Attachment A Maximum Building Coverage (Including primary and accessory buildings. Except Accessory Dwelling Units are not counted toward building coverage) Lots 5 acres or more: 2%. An additional 5% of the total area may be used for agricultural buildings. RC Lots 10,000 sq ft to 5 acres: 15%. On lots greater than 1 acre, an additional 5% of the total area may be used for agricultural buildings. Lots 10,000 sq ft or less: 35%. R-1 35% R-4 Lots greater than 5,000 sq ft: 35% or 2,500 sq ft, whichever is greater. and Lots 5,000 sq ft or less: 50% R-8 R-10 and n/a R-14 "U" suffix: 75% "T" suffix: 75% RM "F" suffix: 35% A maximum coverage of 45% may be obtained through the Hearing Examiner site development plan review process. Maximum Impervious Surface Area R-10 Detached units: 75% Attached units: 60% RM "U" and "T" suffixes: 85%. All other suffixes: 75% Building Design "U" suffix: Modulation of vertical and horizontal facades is required at a minimum of 2 ft. at an interval of a minimum offset of 40 ft. on RM each building face. "U" and "T" suffixes: See RMC 4-3-100 for Urban Design Regulations. DESIGN STANDARDSg a� 8 ,e. General RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, See RMC 4-2-115 R-10, and R-14 Attachment A R-10 and Front yards shall have entry walks that are a minimum width of 3 ft. and a maximum width of 4 ft. R-14 Properties abutting a less intense residential zone may be required to incorporate special design standards (e.g., additional landscaping, larger setbacks, facade articulation, solar access, fencing) through the site development plan review process. RM Properties abutting a designated "focal center," as defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, may be required to provide special design features similar to those listed above through the site development plan review process. LANDSCAPING General R-10 Residential Uses: See RMC 4-4-070 and Commercial or Civic Uses: Lots abutting public streets shall be improved with a minimum 10 ft. wide landscaping strip. 21 Setback areas shall be landscaped, unless otherwise determined through the site development plan review process. 25 RM For RM-U, the landscape requirement does not apply in the Center Downtown, or if setbacks are reduced. 18 If abutting a lot zoned RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, or R-10, then a 15 ft. landscape strip shall be required along the abutting portions of the lot. 22 Minimum Off -Site Landscaping Abutting Public Streets 28 - RC, R-1, R-4, g ft wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip; provided, that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 8 ft this R-8, R- g g p p, p p g Y� , 10, R-14, shall also be landscaped. and RM Minimum On- or Off -Site Tree Requirements 28 R-4 At least two 2 trees of a City -approved s ecies with a minimum caliper of 1%2 er tree shall be planted in the front and or planting strip and ()p p p p Y p g p R-8 of every lot prior to occupancy. "EXTERIOR LIGHTING � s General R-10 and See RMC 4-4-075 R-14 Attachment A Surface Mounted or Roof Top Equipment, or Outdoor Storage R-10, R- 14, and See RMC 4-4-095 RM Recyclables and Refuse RM I See RMC 4-4-090. Utilities R-10 and Utility boxes that are not located in alleyways or away from public gathering spaces shall be screened with landscaping or berms. R-14 f Minimum Size and/or Location Requirements Guidelines for R-10 and R-14: Trash and recycle shall be located so that they are easily accessible to residents. They shall also be invisible to the general public. Both of the following is required: 1. Trash and recycling containers shall be located so that they have minimal impact on residents and their neighbors and so that R-10 they are not visible to the general public; and and 2. A screened enclosure in which to keep containers shall be provided or garages shall be built with adequate space to keep R-14 containers. Screened enclosures shall not be located within front yards. See RMC 4-4-090 RM I See RMC 4-4-090 General Attachment A RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, R-10, See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090 and R-14 PARKING AND & '$ '°., 4 ,•.,. ➢ &'2 >ID f �. ,gyp i " _ $ L.OADIN� S. fi. General R-10 Individual driveways shall not serve more than 4 units. However, tandem driveway space used to accommodate parking requirements is and allowed on a lot. R-14 See RMC 4-4-080 RM See RMC 4-4-080 Required Location for Parking RC, R-1, and See RMC 4-2-115 R-4 For lots abutting an alley with paved and/or crushed rock surfacing: All parking areas and/or attached or detached garages may not occur in front of the building and/or in the area between the front lot line and the front building line; parking areas and garages must R-8 occur at the rear or side of the property, and vehicular access shall be taken from the alley. See RMC 4-2-115 Parking for residents must be located on the lot or in a shared detached garage; when alley access is available, parking shall be provided in the rear yard area. Guest parking may occur on the street or in shared parking areas. R-10 For flats, when alley access is not available, parking should be located in the rear yard, side yard or underground, unless it is determined and through the modification process for site development plan exempt proposals or the site development plan review process for non- R-14 exempt proposals, that parking may be allowed in the front yard or that under building parking (ground level of a residential structure) should be permitted. See RMC 4-2-115 and RMC 4-4-080 "U" and "T" suffix lots abutting an alley: all parking shall be provided in the rear portion of the yard, and access shall be taken from the alley. RM For "U' and "T" suffix lots not abutting an alley: no portion of covered or uncovered parking shall be located between the primary structure and the front property line. Parking structures shall be recessed from the front facade of the primary structure a minimum of 2 Attachment A ft. "F" suffixes: Surface parking is permitted in the side and rear yard areas only. tt C r* sQa 3`M we r a{ ay,* IONS , F ��F � b r y% General R-10, R- 14, and See RMC 4-4-100 RM F��.3_,� � z.'EA .... SIDEWALKS, PATH'1NAY5, AN`D PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS: x 5 General All of the following is required: 1. Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the neighborhood. The sidewalk may disconnect from the road, provided it continues in a logical route throughout the development. R-10 2. Pathways shall be used to connect common parks, green areas, and pocket parks to residential access streets, limited residential and access streets, or other pedestrian connections. They may be used to provide access to homes and common open space. They R-14 shall be a minimum 3 ft in width and made of paved asphalt, concrete, or porous material such as: porous paving stones, crushed gravel with soil stabilizers, or paving blocks with planted joints. 3. For all homes that do not front on a residential access street, limited residential access street, a park, or a common green: pedestrian entry easements that are at least 15 ft wide plus a 5 ft sidewalk shall be provided. MAIL AND NEWSPAPER BOXES Air General Guidelines for R-10 and R-14: Mailboxes shall be located so that they are easily accessible to residents. They shall also be architecturally compatible with the homes. All of the following is required: R-10 1. Mailboxes shall be clustered and located so as to serve the needs of USPS while not adversely affecting the privacy of residents; and and 2. Mailboxes shall be lockable consistent with USPS standard; and R-14 3. Mailboxes shall be architecturally enhanced with materials and details typical of the home's architecture; and 4. Newspaper boxes shall be of a design that reflects the character of the home. HOT.TUBS, POOLS,',AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTS* Or v . :_ w__, . .. ,. - Attachment A General Guidelines for R-10 and R-14: Hot tubs, pools, and mechanical equipment shall be placed so as to not negatively impact neighbors. R-10 Hot tubs and pools shall only be located in back yards and designed to minimize sight and sound impacts to adjoining Pool and p Y Y g g p 1 g and heaters and pumps shall be screened from view and sound insulated. Pool equipment must comply with codes regarding fencing. FENCES AND KEDGES �EIR, ` 3 General R-10 and See RMC 4-4-040 R-14 .i x3 {n� 4 ,u°. y i 2'� 3 'Pj r EXCEPTI0NS� Pre -Existing Legal Lots RC, R-1, Nothing herein shall be determined to prohibit the construction of a single family dwelling and its accessory buildings on a pre-existing R-4, R-8, legal lot provided that all setbacks lot coverage, height limits infrastructure and parking requirements of the zone can be satisfied and R-10, and 8 p g' g p g q R-, a provisions of RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas, can be met. Nothing herein shall be determined to prohibit the construction of a single family dwelling and its accessory buildings or the existence of RM a single family dwelling or two attached dwellings, existing as of March 1, 1995, on a pre-existing legal lot; provided, that all setback, lot coverage, height limits, infrastructure, and parking requirements for this zone can be satisfied, and provisions of RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas, and other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code can be met. Attachment B 4-2-110B Development Standards for Residential Development (Detached Accessory Buildings) s a x "MAXIM � � 3 ��� UM' NUMBER AND SIZE S mks General RC, R-1, R- Accessory structures shall only be allowed on lots in conjunction with a primary use. 4, R-8, R- The total floor area of all accessory buildings shall not be greater than the floor area of the primary residential uses. 10, R-14 and The lot coverage of the primary residential structure along with all accessory buildings shall not exceed the maximum lot coverage of RM the Zoning District 17 Accessory Dwelling Unit RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, R- 16 1 unit per lot of record — 800 sq ft 10, and R- 14 RM n/a Other Types of Accessory Structures Allowed in Addition to Accessory Dwelling Unit RC 2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft. per structure, or and 1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft. R-1 In addition, 1 barn or stable — max. 2,000 sq. ft.; provided the lot is 5 acres or more. R-4 2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft. per structure, or and 1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft. R-8 R-10 1 structure per residential unit — max. 400 sq. ft provided that they are architecturally consistent with the principal structure. and Except, greenhouses, sheds, or other similar accessory structures — max. 150 sq. ft. and no taller than 12 ft. R-14 HEIGIT��; 5 a Maximum Building Height except for uses having a "Public Suffix" (P) designation 819 RC Accessory building —15 ft. Attachment B R-1, R-4, Accessory dwelling units — 30 ft. and R-8 Animal husbandry or agricultural related structures — 30 ft R-10 and Accessory building —15 ft. R-14 Accessory dwelling unit — 30 ft. RM 25 ft., except in the RM-U District where the maximum height shall be determined through the site plan review process. LOCATION .� =� . General RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, n/a and R-10 R-14 Garages and carports shall only have access from the alley when lots abut an alley. When lots do not abut an alley, garages and carports shall be located in the rear yard or side yard and set back from the front of the primary structure by a minimum of 6 feet. "U" Suffix: Garages and carports shall only have access from the alley when lots abut an alley. When lots do not abut an alley, garages RM and carports shall be located in the rear yard or side yard. IVIINIMUM°SETBACKS'�t3� z� r General RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, R- 10, R-14, 6 ft. from any residential structure. If sited closer than 6 ft., the structure will be considered to be attached. and RM Side Yards for Accessory Buildings RC and 5 ft. unless located between the rear of the house and the rear property line, then 0 ft. side yard is allowed. R-1 R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14 and 3 ft. unless located between the rear of the house and the rear property line, then 0 ft. side yard is allowed. RM Side Yards for Accessory Dwelling Units RC 125 ft., except when along a street then 30 ft.' Attachment B R-1 25 ft., except when along a street then 20 ft.7 R-4 15 combined ft. 12,13 is allowed with a minimum of 5 ft. for any side yard, except when along a street then 20 ft 12,13 For small lot clusters 5 ft. is allowed 10 except when along a street then 20 ft 5 ft., except when along a street then 15 ft.7 or when part of an attached garage that accesses from the side along a street then 20 R 8 yard ft. R-10 and 4 ft., except when located on a corner lot then, 8 ft. with an 18 ft setback from the face of the garage to the back of the curb and/or to R-14 any sidewalk or pathway. RM n/a Rear Yards for Accessory Buildings RC 5 ft. R-1, 3 ft., unless located between the rear of the house and the rear property line, then 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. R-4, R-8, R-10, R- Except for garages, in order to ensure that there is adequate vehicular turning radius, garages on alleys shall be located as follows: 14, and 1. 9 ft. garage doors shall be at least 26 ft. from the back edge of the alley, or RM 2. 16 ft. garage doors shall be at least 24 ft. from the back edge of the alley. Rear Yards for Accessory Dwelling Units RC Determined through administrative review, to be no less than 10 ft. and no greater than 35 ft. R-1 and Determined through administrative review, to be no less than 10 ft. and no greater than 25 ft. R-4 R-8 Determined through administrative review, to be no less than 5 ft. and no greater than 20 ft. R-10 and Determined through administrative review, to be no less than 5 ft. and no greater than 10 ft. R-14 RM I n/a Front Yard/Side Yard Along Streets RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, R- 10, Accessory structures are not permitted within required front yards or side yards along streets. R-14, and RM Attachment B Special Setbacks for Animal Husbandry or Agricultural Related Structures RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, R- Agricultural related structures — 50 ft. from any property line. 10, and Stables and other animal husbandry related structures, see RMC 4-4-010 R-14 RM n/a Clear Vision Area RC, R-1, R- 4, R-8, R- 10, In no case shall a structure over 42 in. in height intrude into the 20 ft. clear vision area defined in RMC 4-11-030. R-14, and RM s^^ sa . ,� �- _• � a5 _ �`,�i€ � F�- Bait , . < lax � �, s ,� �3..�� ,:'� �c a General RC and R- Garages and carports must provide a minimum of 24 ft. of back -out room, either on site or counting improved alley surface or other 1, R-4, improved right-of-way surface. and R-8 See RMC 4-4-080 R-10 Garages shall be set back a minimum of 10 ft. from the front of the building fagade or 7 ft. from the back. of a porch or stoop. Garages and shall have a minimum 18 foot driveway length from the face of the garage to the back of the sidewalk or access lane, unless accessed by R-14 an alleyway. CRITICAL AREAS$ M General RC and R- 1, R-4, and R-8, See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090 R-10, and R-14 Attachment C F. REQUIREMENTS 1. Site Design LOT CONFIGURATION;, Ua,rty m thefconfiguraton of;lots enhances the ima' a of.."vanet '.of housm stock.and hel s minimize. 'erce bons S cSFd' Y{'3% ' :s % ii p r p ,.p ,of :monotony ,x Guidelines: Developments shall create pedestrian oriented environments and amplify the mutual relationship between housing units, roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities, while also protecting the privacy of individuals. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety within the development. Standards: RC, R-1, n/a and R-4 One of the following is required: 1. Lot width variation of 10 feet (10') minimum of one (1) per four (4) abutting street -fronting lots, or R 8 2. Minimum of four (4) lot sizes (minimum of four hundred (400) gross square feet size difference), or 3. A front yard setback variation of at least five feet (5') minimum for at least every four (4) abutting street fronting lots. R-10 and Developments of more than nine (9) detached dwellings shall incorporate a variety of home sizes, lot sizes, and unit clusters. R-14 AIE ? Y e y r> GARAGE5:. The minimization of;the,visual im act of `ara""s contri p g g butes to creatimg communities that are orientated to people "and" pedestrians, as opposed to automobiles } x r �k �. r . ...,. _.. ,F Guidelines: The visual impact of garages shall be minimized while porches and front doors shall be t p g g p he emphasis of the front of the home. Garages shall be located in a manner that minimizes the presence of the garage and shall not be located at the end of view corridors. Alleyway access is encouraged. If used, shared garages shall be within an acceptable walking distance to the housing unit it is intended to serve. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 One of the following is required; the garage is: R-4 1. Recessed from the front of the house and/or front porch at least eight feet (8'), or and 2. Located so that the roof extends at least five feet (5') (not including eaves) beyond the front of the garage for at least the width of R-8 the garage plus the porch/stoop area, or 3. Alley accessed, or Attachment C 4. Located so that the entry does not face a public and/or private street or an access easement, or 5. Sized so that it represents no greater than fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front fagade at ground level, or 6. Detached. The portion of the garage wider than twenty six -feet (26') across the front shall be setback at least two feet (2'). Garages may be attached or detached. Shared garages are also allowed, provided the regulations of RMC 4-4-080 are met. Carports are not allowed. One of the following is required; the garage must be: 1. Recessed from the front of the house and/or front porch at least 8 feet (8'), or 2. Detached. Additionally, all of the following is required: R-10 1. Garage design shall be of similar design to the homes, and and 2. A minimum eighteen feet (18') driveway length from the face of the garage to the back of the sidewalk or access easement/lane is R-14 required, unless accessed by an alley, and 3. If sides of the garage are visible from streets, lanes, sidewalks, pathways, trails, or other homes, architectural details shall be incorporated in the design. If shared garages are allowed, they may share the structure with other homes and all of the following is required: 1. Each unit has garage space assigned to it, and 2. The garage is not be located further than 160 ft. from any of the housing units to which it is assigned, and 3. The garage shall not exceed forty-four feet (44') in width, and shall maintain an eight feet (8') separation from any dwellings. 2. Open Space ... zpenspaNax�cent;ma �a�n' d� .gc.reatex s oppoh�it� iev or; � o^c_ox.�d� h� ealth � �,�:OPENSPACnthetleVelomtof live s'comunities z`t._ r� Guidelines: All open space shall be designed to preserve existing trees. Except for Native Growth Protection Areas, all common open space areas shall be designed to accommodate both active and passive recreational opportunities and be visible and open to the street. Pocket parks shall be designed to serve four (4) to ten (10) homes. Private yards are located at the rear or side of homes and can include trees, planting beds, and privacy fences. Reciprocal use easements can provide greater usability of private yards. Landscaping: R-10 and See RMC 4-4-070 R-14 Standards for Parks: R-10 I For developments that are less than ten (10) net acres: no park is required, but is allowed. Attachment C ........ pRIMARY<ENTRY H6 s.with a visual) : rominent frontrent ,>foster:: he sense thatahe;comrimuni is or"iented to atures like Y p rY Y pe or�he� and too s at the front.entr rovide:o ortunit f rs I`'i p r y p pp y o- ocia nteraction and pan oonteibute to a sense of lace for r sident3 Add tianell'' .. wr_ h„ a .. porches work to mirimize,the apearanee of bulk by li"reeking°up thefacade g} , Guidelines: Entrances to homes shall be a focal point and allow space for social interaction. Front doors shall face the street and be on the facade closest to the street. When a home is located on a corner lot (i.e. at the intersection of two roads or the intersection of a road and a common space) a feature like a wrapped porch shall be used to reduce the perceived scale of the house and engage the street or open space on both sides. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 One of the following is required: R-4 1. Stoop: minimum size four feet by six feet (4' x 6') and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade, or and 2. Porch: minimum size five feet (5') deep and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade. R 8 Exception: in cases where accessibility (ADA) is a priority, an accessible route may be taken from a front driveway. Both of the following are required: 1. The entry shall take access from and face a street, park, common green, pocket park, pedestrian easement, or open space, and R-10 2• The entry shall include one of the following: and a. Stoop: minimum size four feet by six feet (4' x 6') and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade, or R-14 b. Porch: minimum five feet (5') deep and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade. Exception: in cases where accessibility (ADA) is a priority, an accessible route may be taken from a front driveway. Ss ' yp #r a •�ACAMMODULATICyN. The.rriq fac'a'des creates a . ea A well hat help to .ul`ation'-of -an .ance`ofwariet. as v create �Isual interest, .. -, . I?p - . Y, isual freaks E a..._ ..� re _ w, �.� _�.# , . " Guidelines: Buildings shall not have monotonous facades along public areas. Dwellings shall include articulation along public frontages; the articulation may include the connection of an open porch to the building, a dormer facing the street, or a well-defined entry element. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 R-4 One of the following is required: and 1. An offset of at least one story that is at least ten feet (10') wide and two feet (2') in depth on facades visible from the street, or R-8 2. At least two feet (2') offset of second story from first story on one street facing facade. Both of the following are required: R-10 1. The primary building elevation oriented toward the street or common green shall have at least one articulation or change in plane of. and at least two feet (2') in depth; and R-14 2. A minimum one side articulation that measures at least one foot (1') in depth shall occur for all facades facing streets or public spaces Attachment C _ a 1AiINDOW5'AND;DOORS ,Windows and front doors are an ►ntegral part of the arci�tecturai character of a home and when they mcarporate fthe buildu 'form Addtionall when -the re resent a architectural elements Ahe home, the, :contribute to,the overall_balance and mte sigh ificant am a ount of the,f�'ade of �home, the .;amplify the sense that thecommunity that is oriented to people ;< u_.... ti , . Guidelines: Windows and front doors shall serve as an integral part of the character of the home. Primary windows shall be proportioned vertically rather than horizontally. Vertical windows may be combined together to create a larger window area. Front doors shall be a focal point of the dwelling and be in scale with the home. All doors shall be of the same character as the home. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 R-4 and Windows and doors shall constitute twenty-five (25%) of all facades facing street frontage or public spaces. R-8 All of the following are required: 1. Primary windows shall be proportioned vertically, rather than horizontally, and 2. Vertical windows may be combined together to create a larger window area, and R-10 3. All doors shall be made of wood, fiberglass, metal, or glass and trimmed with three and one half inches ( 3%") minimum head and and jamb trim around the door, and R-14 4. Screen doors are permitted, and 5. Primary entry doors shall face a street, park, common green, pocket park, or pedestrian easement and shall be paneled or have inset windows, and 6. Sliding glass doors are not permitted along a frontage elevation or an elevation facing a pedestrian easement. SCALE 3BULK ;AND,CHARACTER` Residential communities are intended fo;r, eo le and;homes that have appropriate scale and bulk contribute; w ile' hel m .to fdster� erce tion`:of .. ao thesense of orientation to� .,eo �e..Variety;m he character.of homes helps to minimize visual monotony. ,n p g ;, p p ' p p llniouenesS Of place ,E.. .In i s r Guidelines: A diverse streetscape shall be provided by using elevations and models that demonstrate a variety of floor plans, home sizes, and character. Neighborhoods shall have a variety of home sizes and character. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 A variety of elevations and models that demonstrate a variety of floor plans, home sizes, and character shall be used. R-4 and Additionally, both of the following are required: R-8 1. A minimum of three (3) differing home models for each ten (10) contiguous abutting homes, and 2. Abutting houses must have differing architectural elevations. Attachment C All of the following are required: 1. The primary building form shall be the dominating form and elements such as porches, principal dormers, or other significant R-10 features shall not dominate, and and 2. Primary porch plate heights shall be one (1) story. Stacked porches are allowed, and R-14 3. To differentiate the same models and elevations, different colors shall be used, and 4. For single-family dwellings, no more than two (2) of the same model and elevation shall be built on the same block frontage and the same model and elevation shall not be abutting. ... ...;; : pia, 4,. .. •t .::•. •' } <.'�x3 pkx, D::, F b� ;,�; $,. .�.A �• r sand rofiles?are anim "orfiant corn onent.m,:the'architecturalcharacter of`homesand'contribute to.the massm f scale, and ROOD$. Roof fo m p„ p p �y ,hh g Y-""�12 Y 3 " : Z h. proportion of the'hpme - Roofs also provide o'p;portunity to create variety,'especially for;liomes of thesame model . -_... .. w Guidelines: Roofs shall represent a variety of forms and profiles that add character and relief to the landscape of the neighborhood. The use of bright colors, as well as, roofing that is made of material like gravel and/or a reflective material is discouraged. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 One of the following is required for all development: R-4 1. Hip or gabled with at least a six to twelve (6:12) pitch for the prominent form of the roof (dormers, etc. may have lesser pitch), or and 2. Shed roof. R-8 Additionally, for subdivisions greater than nine (9) lots: A variety of roof forms appropriate to the style of the home shall be used. R-10 Both of the following are required: and 1. Primary roof pitch shall be a minimum six to twelve (6:12). If a gable roof is used, exit access from a third floor must face a public right of way for emergency access, and R-14 2. A variety of roofing colors shall be used within the development and all roof material shall be fire retardant. s.-. •,..; 4*`..' i , ., '. 7 Ww' .tl'1. 3`.P% y .F 3• F AV$ The design of eaves and:nverhangs act as unifying elerne nts in the architecturahcfiar"aster ofYa home` When sized ode `uatel and used consistently "j,he ;work to create desirable shadows that help to`create visiaa mte`rest especiallV� rbm<lilank, unbroken wolf planes Y -, Ym...� Guidelines: Eaves should be detailed and proportioned to complement the architectural style of the home. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 Both of the following are required: R-4 and 1. Eaves projecting from the roof of the entire building at least twelve inches (12") with horizontal fascia or fascia gutter at least five inches (5) deep on the face of all eaves, and R-8 2. Rakes on gable ends must extend a minimum of two inches (2)" from the surface of exterior siding materials. Attachment C R-10 The following is required: Eaves shall be at least twelve inches (12") with horizontal fascia or fascia gutter at least five inches (5") deep on and the face of all eaves. R-14 NMM ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING. Architectural defailin contributes to the visual a" eal,of :home and:the coin`munit, It hef s to Cc a P y e �a desirable human scale and a of a,qualitywell designed home percepti©n Guidelines: Architectural detail shall be provided that is appropriate to the architectural character of the home. Detailing like trim, columns, and/or corner boards shall reflect the architectural character of the house. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 If one siding material is used on any side of the dwelling that is two stories or greater in height, a horizontal band that measures at least eight inches (8") is required between the first and second story. R-4 and Additionally, one of the following is required: R-8 1. Three and one half inch (3%2") minimum trim surrounds all windows and details all doors, or 2. A combination of shutters and three and one half inches (3%:") minimum trim details all windows, and, three and one half inches (3%:") minimum trim details all doors. All of the following are required: 1. Three and one half inches (3%") minimum trim surrounds all windows and details all doors, and 2. At least one (1) of the following architectural details shall be provided on each home: shutters, knee braces, flower boxes, or R-10 columns, and and 3. Where siding is used, metal corner clips or corner boards shall be used and shall be at minimum two and one half inches (2 %:") in R-14 width and painted. If shutters are used, they shall be proportioned to the window size to simulate the ability to cover them, and 4. If columns are used, they shall be round, fluted, or strongly related to the home's architectural style. Six inches by six inches (6" x 6") posts may be allowed if chamfered and/or banded. Exposed four inches by four inches (4" x 4") and six inches by six inches (6" x 6") posts are prohibited. x` s TE IAL WA R S AND COLOR.><:The use of.a:variet ,of materials an`d color contr butes`to the -sense of diver it = f '` ,. L housmg`stock m the'community , Guidelines: A diversity of materials and color shall be used on homes throughout the community. A variety of materials that are appropriate to the architectural character of the neighborhood shall be used. A diverse palette of colors shall be used to reduce monotony of color or tone. Standards: RC and n/a R-1 R-4 Abutting homes shall be of differing color. Color palettes for all new dwellings, coded to the home elevations, shall be submitted for Attachment C and I approval. R-8 Additionally, one (1) of the following is required: 1. A minimum of two (2) colors is used on the home (body with different color trim is acceptable), or 2. A minimum of two (2) differing siding materials (horizontal siding and shingles, siding and masonry or masonry -like material, etc.) is used on the home. One (1) alternative siding material must comprise a minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the street facing facade. If masonry siding is used, it shall wrap the corners no less than twentv-four inches (24"). All of the following are required: 1. Acceptable exterior wall materials are: wood, cement fiberboard, stucco, stone, and standard sized brick three and one half inches by seven and one half inches (3 %2" x 7 %2") or three and five eighths inches by seven and five eighths inches ( 3 %" x 7 W). Simulated stone, wood, stone, or brick may be used to detail homes, and R-10 2. When more than one material is used, changes in a vertical wall, such as from wood to brick, shall wrap the corners no less than and twenty-four inches (24'). The material change shall occur at an internal corner or a logical transition such as aligning with a R-14 window edge or chimney. Material transition shall not occur at an exterior corner, and 3. Multiple colors on buildings shall be provided. Muted deeper tones, as opposed to vibrant primary colors, shall be the dominant colors. Color palettes for all new structures, coded to the home elevations, shall be submitted for approval. 4. Gutters and downspouts shall be integrated into the color scheme of the home and be painted, or of an integral color, to match the trim color. November 10, 2009 2,500 5,000 Feet Urban Design Districts 1:55,000 H:ICEDIPlanninglGISIGIS_projectsldocket items) urban center design_ overlay_districtlmxdsl urban_design districts 8xll_nov09.mxd Community & Economic Development �— r Alex Pietsch, Administrator City Ol 1 r' Data/GIS Analysis Sen9ces � Adriana A. Johnson, Patrick Rpduin If: flap pradua:tl 6y t^e City of Renton (c), the City of Re^.ton all npks reserved. tJa wane^lies of ar.y sorb indudin but no; limited to accuracy, �;, per. ,-�-. ., z,:r..i_4• t tness or mermantacility, accompany this Product. Attachment E D. BONUS ALLOWANCES AND REVIEW CRITERIA: The following table lists the conditions under which additional density or alternative bulk standards may be achieved: R-14 ZONE Density and Unit The bonus provisions are intended to allow greater flexibility in the implementation of the purpose Size Bonus — of the R-14 designation. Bonus criteria encourage higher amenity neighborhoods and affordable Purpose: housing.. Maximum 1 to 4 additional dwelling units per net acre. Densities of greater than 18 units per net acre are Additional Units prohibited. Per Acre• Dwelling Unit Mix/Arrangement: N/A Bonus Criteria: To qualify for the density bonus, the applicant shall provide either: (i) Alley and/or rear access and parking for 50% of detached or townhouse units, or (ii) Civic uses such as a community meeting hall, senior center, recreation center, or other similar uses as determined by the Administrator, or (iii) A minimum of 2 units of affordable housing per net developable acre (fractional results shall be rounded up to the next whole number). In addition, in order to qualify for a bonus, developments shall also incorporate at leastl of the features described below: (i) Active common recreation amenities such as sports courts, recreation center, pool, spa/jacuzzi. (ii) Surface parking lots containing not more than 6 parking stalls separated from other parking areas by landscaping with a minimum width of 15 feet. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON teadeel � lL/llt4©? ew 15ed i - f- A f �s• �-il� �(.o ORDINANCE NO. J��1 / aeee;v� a����� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDIN CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS, CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 8, PERMITS GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 9, PERMITS — SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON-, TO AMEND LAND USE PERMIT PROCESSES. P 2 :5— WHEREAS, City development regulations establish predictable processes for the development and subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, land use permit procedures identify the decision and recommendation authority, process for public notice, open and closed record hearing requirements, and appeal authority; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that streamlining land use permit procedures would result in effective land use permitting; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that public involvement. in land use permitting would remain available to all interested parties; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-060D, Other Residential, Lodging and Home Occupations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment A. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-0601, Retail, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION III. Subsection 4-2-060J, Entertainment and Recreation, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment C. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-2-060K, Services, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment D. 2 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION V. Subsection 4-2-060L, Vehicle Related Activities, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment E. SECTION VI. Subsection 2 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. The following table indicates the maximum requested size/standard change that may be allowed by an Administrative conditional use permit. Increases above these levels may not be achieved by a variance or the conditional use permit process. APPLICABLE ZONE STANDARD CHANGE REQUEST CN Uses restricted to 3,000 gross s.f. — increases: Between 3,000 — 5,000 s.f. CN Uses restricted to 5,000 gross s.f. — increases up to: 20% or 1,000 gross s.f. All of the CV Zone Uses restricted to 65,000 gross s.f. — increases up to: 40% or 26,000 gross s.f. SECTION VII. Subsection 10 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 3 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 10. Heights may exceed the maximum height under an Administrative conditional use permit. In consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for a building height in excess of ninety five feet (95') the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee shall consider the following factors in addition to the criteria in RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits, among all other relevant information: a. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Buildings in excess of ninety-five feet (95') in height at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of ninety-five feet (95') in height is adjacent to a lot designated residential on the City Comprehensive Plan, then setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone. 4 ORDINANCE NO. d. Bulk: Buildings near public open spaces should permit public access and, where feasible, physical access to the public open space. Whenever practicable, buildings should be oriented to minimize the shadows they cause on publicly accessible open space. e. Light and Glare: Due consideration shall be given to mitigation of light and glare impacts upon streets, major public facilities and major public open spaces. SECTION Vill. Subsection 12 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 12. Heights may exceed the maximum height by up to fifty feet (50') with bonuses for plazas and other amenities, subject to an Administrative conditional use permit. SECTION IX. Subsection 16 of subsection 4-2-120C, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Tables for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown as follows: 16. The following height requests may be allowed by an Administrative conditional use permit: 5 ORDINANCE NO. APPLICABLE ZONE I HEIGHT CHANGE REQUEST All of the CV Zone Exceed height of 50 feet Exceed height of 45 feet when abutting R-8 or R-10 Zone All of the CA Zone Exceed maximum height In consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for additional building height, the Reviewing Official shall consider all relevant information, and the following factors along with the criteria in RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits. a. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Building heights shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of the maximum height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot designated R-11 R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-F, then the setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the Commercial Zone. SECTION X. Subsection 4 of subsection 4-2-130B, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Industrial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts 0 ORDINANCE NO. — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. To construct a building or structure in excess of 50' requires an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. SECTION XI. Subsection 4-3-050N.3.a.iii, Review Authority, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: iii. Review Authority: A variance shall be decided by the Administrator based on the standards set forth in RMC 4-9-250B, Variance Procedures. SECTION XII. Subsection 4-3-050N.3.c.iii., Review Authority, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: iii. Review Authority: Variances shall be determined administratively by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee, as indicated in RMC 4-9-250B. SECTION XI11. Subsection 4-4-1301, Variance Procedures, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 7 ORDINANCE NO. I. VARIANCE PROCEDURES: The Reviewing Official shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of this Section pursuant to RMC 4-8-070D and the decision criteria in RMC 4-9-250. SECTION XIV. Section 4-7-020, Administering Authority, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CED): CED is responsible for the administration and coordination of this Chapter including but not limited to, reviewing all engineering and technical requirements of this Chapter, unless another department is authorized to administer and enforce a specific section or sections. B. ADMINISTRATOR: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee shall review and make recommendations to the Hearing Examiner for preliminary plats, but shall have the authority to approve short plats. C. HEARING EXAMINER: The Hearing Examiner is authorized to hold a public hearing on all preliminary plats and shall approve all preliminary plats and final plats. SECTION XV. Subsection 4-7-050C.4, Plats with Four (4) or Less Lots, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled F-1 ORDINANCE NO. "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Short Plats", and to read as follows: 4. Short Plats: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee may approve, modify, or deny the short subdivision; or transfer the matter to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing and decision. SECTION XVI. Subsection 4-7-050C.5, Plats with Five (5) to Nine (9) Lots, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections renumbered accordingly. SECTION XVII. Subsection 4-7-050D.5, Hearing, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Hearing: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing and issue a final determination regarding the preliminary plat. SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4-7-050D.7, Final Review, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. Final Review: The applicant submits the final plat to the Department of Community and Economic Development for its review. The CED Department will forward the final plat and its recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. 9 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIX. Subsection 4-7-050D.8, Recording, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 8. Recording: The approved final plat is recorded with the office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. SECTION XX. Subsection 4-7-070H.2, Action, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Action: The Administrator may approve, approve with modifications, or deny the application for a short plat. Action for short plats otherwise referred to the Hearing Examiner, shall be by the Hearing Examiner. Every decision or recommendation made under this Section shall include findings of fact and conclusions to support the decision or recommendation. SECTION XXI. Subsection 4-7-070H.5, Referral to the Hearing Examiner, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Referral to the Hearing Examiner: If the Administrator determines that there are sufficient concerns by residents in the area of the short plat, or by City staff, to warrant a public hearing, then he/she shall refer the short plat to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the public hearing shall be given as required for a full subdivision. 10 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXII. Subsection 4-7-0801.1, Public Hearing Required, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Public Hearing Required: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing on any preliminary plat and either approve, approve with conditions or deny the preliminary plat. The Hearing Examiner shall assure conformance with the general purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted standards. The Hearing Examiner's decision shall be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law. SECTION XXIII. Subsection 4-7-080J, Health Agency Recommendation, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: J. HEALTH AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: The health agencies responsible for approval of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply shall file with the CED Department, prior to the Hearing Examiner's consideration of the preliminary plat, written statements as to the general adequacy of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply. (Applicant is responsible for submitting appropriate application forms to the Seattle -King County Health Department and for paying the Health Department review fee.) Ron ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXIV. Subsection 4-7-080K, City Council Action, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby repealed. SECTION XXV. Subsection 4-7-080L.2, Additional Extensions, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Additional Extensions: Additional time extensions beyond this one-year time period may be granted by the Hearing Examiner if the applicant can show need caused by unusual circumstances or situations which make it unduly burdensome to file the final plat within the four (4) year time period. The applicant must file a written request with the Hearing Examiner and the CED Department for this additional time extension; this request must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the plat expiration date. The request must include documentation as to the need for the additional time period. SECTION XXVI. Subsection 4-7-080L.4, Phased Subdivision, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Phased Subdivision: In the case of a phased subdivision, final plat approval by the Hearing Examiner of any phase of the preliminary plat will constitute an automatic one-year extension for the filing of the next phase of the subdivision. 12 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXVII. Subsection 4-7-080M.3, Process for Major Amendments, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Process for Major Amendments: If the Administrator determines that the proposed amendment is major, the Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing on the proposed major amendment in accordance with the requirements for preliminary plat approval found in subsection I of this Section provided, however, that any public hearing on a proposed major amendment shall be limited to whether the proposed major amendment should or should not be approved. Following the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve or disapprove any proposed major amendment and may make any modifications in the terms and conditions of the preliminary plat approval to the extent that they are reasonably related to the proposed amendment. If the applicant is unwilling to accept the proposed major amendment under the terms and conditions specified by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant may withdraw the proposed major amendment and develop the subdivision in accordance with the original preliminary plat approval (as it may have previously been amended). SECTION XXVIII. Subsection 4-7-110C, City Council Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Hearing Examiner Approval', and to read as follows: 13 ORDINANCE NO. C. HEARING EXAMINER APPROVAL: At its first public meeting following the date the final plat application has been officially accepted by the CED Department, the Hearing Examiner shall set a date to consider the final plat. The final plat shall be approved, disapproved or returned to the applicant for modification or correction by the Hearing Examiner. SECTION XXIX. Subsection 4-7-110E, Filing Final Plat, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: E. FILING FINAL PLAT: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee must provide written approval of the final plat prior to its submission to the Hearing Examiner. The final plat must then be approved by the Hearing Examiner, and signed by the Mayor and the City Clerk, prior to being filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections by the City. SECTION XXX. Subsection 4-7-110F, Expiration of Plat After Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: F. EXPIRATION OF PLAT AFTER APPROVAL: 14 ORDINANCE NO. If a final plat has not been recorded within six (6) months after approval by the Hearing Examiner, the plat shall expire and be null and void. To revitalize the expired plat, the plat shall be resubmitted as a preliminary plat. One extension to the six (6) month period may be granted by the Hearing Examiner. SECTION XXXI. Subsection 4-7-120A, Continuity with Improved Additions, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. CONTINUITY WITH IMPROVED ADDITIONS: No plan for the replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any areas shall be approved by the Hearing Examiner unless the streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road or street (according to City specifications) to an existing street or highway. SECTION XXXII. Subsection 4-7-220B, Procedure, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby repealed. SECTION XXXIII. Subsection 4-7-230H, Permit Procedures for Binding Site Plan Approval, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: H. PERMIT PROCEDURES FOR BINDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL: 15 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Permit Type: Binding site plans shall be processed as Type II permits in accordance with the procedures in chapter 4-8 RMC for Type II permits and the standards and criteria set forth in this Section, unless the applicant elects to merge the binding site plan application with the site plan review process or combined site plan/planned action review process in which case the binding site plan shall be processed in accordance with the procedures set out in chapters 4- 8 and 4-9 RMC. If a binding site plan permit is processed concurrently, but not merged with another permit process, then the binding site plan application shall be processed as a Type II permit. 2. Review Authority: Pursuant to chapter 4-8 RMC, the Responsible Official for a binding site plan application shall be the Administrator, unless the applicant elects to have the binding site plan application merged with a Type III permit site plan application or a development agreement under chapter 36.70B RCW. If a binding site plan application is to be processed with a Type III site plan, then the responsible Reviewing Official shall be the Hearing Examiner. If a binding site plan application is to be processed with a development agreement, the responsible Reviewing Official shall be the City Council. The final decision on a development agreement with an application for a binding site plan shall be made by City Council. No administrative appeal of the City Council decision shall be available. If a binding site plan is merged with a planned urban development application, the review authority shall be determined pursuant to RMC 4-9-150. 16 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXXIV. Subsection '4-7-230K.4, Referral to the Hearing Examiner, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Referral to the Hearing Examiner: Except when a binding site plan is merged with a development agreement, if the Reviewing Official determines that there are sufficient concerns by residents in the area of the binding site plan, or by City staff, to warrant a public hearing, then he/she shall refer the binding site plan to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the public hearing will be given as for a Type III permit hearing. Binding site plans merged with development agreements shall be approved by City Council pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.7013.170 et seq. SECTION XXXV. Subsection 4-7-240A, Authority, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: A. AUTHORITY: A variance from the requirements of this Chapter may be approved by the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B. SECTION XXXVI. Section 4-8-040, Permit Processes Classified by Type, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 17 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-8-040 PERMIT PROCESSES CLASSIFIED BY TYPE: Development subject to review by the City is classified and processed using one of the six (6) types of land use permit procedures listed in RMC 4-8-080G. The review process for the types of permit review procedures are described in RMC 4-8-080H. If the code does not expressly provide for review according to one of the (6) types of permit review procedures, and another specific procedure is not required by law, the Development Services Division shall classify the application. SECTION XXXVII. Subsection 3 of subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Permits to rebuild for nonconforming structures; SECTION XXXVIII. Subsection 15 of subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development. Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 15. Short plats; SECTION XXXIX. Subsection a of subsection 4-8-070D.20, Variances, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 18 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Code of General Ordinances.of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. Administrative pursuant to RMC 4-9-25013; SECTION XL. Subsection 4-8-070D, Community and Economic Development Administrator or Designee, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 22, to read as follows: 22. Final Planned Urban Developments. SECTION XLI. Subsection 4-8-070H.1, Authority, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Authority: The Hearing Examiner shall review and act on the following: a. Appeals of administrative decisions/determinations (including, but not limited to, parking, sign, street, tree cutting/routine vegetation management standards, and Urban Center Design Overlay District regulations) and ERC decisions, excepting determinations of whether an application is a bulk storage facility which shall be appealable to the City Council, b. Appeals relating to RMC 4-5-060, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, c. Bulk storage special permit and variances from the bulk storage regulations, 19 ORDINANCE NO. d. Permit to rebuild for nonconforming uses, e. Conditional use permit, f. Fill and grade permit, special, g. Master Plan review (overall plan) and major amendments to an overall Master Plan, h. Mobile home parks, preliminary and final, L Planned urban development, preliminary, j. Plats, preliminary and final, k. Shoreline conditional use permit, I. Shoreline variance, m. Site plan approvals requiring a public hearing, n. Special permits, o. Variances from wireless communication facility development standards, the provisions of the subdivision regulations, and variances associated with a development permit that requires review by the Hearing Examiner, and p. Building permits submitted in conjunction with any of the above. SECTION XLII. Subsection 4-8-070H.3, Recommendations, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Recommendations: The Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing and make recommendations to the City Council on the following: 20 ORDINANCE NO. a. Rezones, site specific, in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, b. Special permits requiring Council approval. SECTION XLI11. Subsection 4-8-0701, City Council, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to delete subsections 7, 8, 9 and 14 and to renumber the remaining subsections accordingly. SECTION XLIV. Subsection 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown on Attachment F. SECTION XLV. Subsection 4-8-080H, Review Processes, of Chapter 8, Permits — General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted. SECTION XLVI. Subsection 4-9-030C, City Authority, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: C. CITY AUTHORITY: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development and/or designee or the Hearing Examiner, as specified in RMC 4-2- 060, Zoning Use Tables, shall have the authority to permit conditional uses. SECTION XLVII. Subsection 4-9-030G, Decision Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General 21 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "G. DECISION CRITERIA" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-030G.1 — 11 shall remain as currently codified, except as amended in Sections XLVIII and XLVIIII of this ordinance. G. DECISION CRITERIA: The Planning Director or the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: SECTION XLVIII. Subsection 4-9-030G.2, Community Need, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Community Need: The proposed use constitutes a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. Community Need factors include, among all other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. SECTION XLIX. Subsection 4-9-030G.8, Landscaping, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 22 ORDINANCE NO. 8. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. SECTION L. Subsection 4-9-030L, Decision and Conditions, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: L. DECISION AND CONDITIONS: The governing authority may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the requested conditional use permit. The Planning Director or Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant the conditional use permit upon making a determination, in writing, that the use is consistent with subsection G of this Section, Decision Criteria. The Planning Director or Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Planning Director or Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. SECTION Ll. Subsection 4-9-150C, Roles and Responsibility, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"; is hereby amended to read as follows: C. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY: 1. The Department of Community and Economic Development (CED): CED shall be responsible for the general administration and coordination of this 23 ORDINANCE NO. Section. However, all proposed Code modifications shall be reviewed at the same time by the Hearing Examiner. 2. City Departments: Applicable City departments shall review each proposed planned urban development in accordance with procedures in chapters 4-8 and 4-9 RMC as appropriate. 3. Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall be the official City designee for the public hearings, or review of requested Code modifications, as well as the overall proposal itself. SECTION LII. Subsection 4-9-150F, Procedure for Preliminary Approval of Planned Urban Developments, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: F. PROCEDURE FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENTS: The approval of a planned urban development shall be by the Hearing Examiner, upon recommendation from the City Staff, and shall be processed in accordance with the following procedures: 1. Permit Process: Planned urban developments shall be processed consistent with chapter 4-8 RMC as Type II or III permits as specified. 2. Filing of Application: The application for preliminary approval of a planned urban development shall be filed with the Department of Community and Economic Development accompanied by a filing fee as established by RMC 24 ORDINANCE NO. 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. Wherever a planned urban development is intended to be subdivided into smaller parcels, an application for preliminary plat approval may be submitted together with the application for final planned urban development approval. In such case, the preliminary plat and the final planned urban development shall be processed and reviewed concurrently. Subsequent to final planned urban development approval, a planned urban development may also be subdivided by the binding site plan process. 3. Informal Review: Applicant must submit a conceptual plan for preapplication review, prior to submission of an application for preliminary approval. 4. Submittal Requirements and Application Fees: A preliminary development plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development and shall include the general intent of the development, apportionment of land for buildings and land use, proposed phases, if any, and such other information or documentation which the Department of Community and Economic Development shall require. Submittal requirements and fees shall be as listed in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees, and RMC 4-8-120C, Land Use Applications. 5. Public Notice and Comment Period: See RMC 4-8-090, Public Notice Requirements. 6. Phasing: Planned urban developments may be proposed to be developed in one or more phases. If developed in phases, each phase of the planned urban 25 ORDINANCE NO. development shall contain adequate parking, open space, recreation space, public benefits, landscaping, buffering, circulation, utilities and other improvements necessary so that each phase, together with any earlier phases, may stand alone and satisfy the purposes of this Section. Further, each phase must meet the requirements of subsection D2 of this Section, Public Benefit Required, unless the public benefits have been met by previously approved phases. 7. Review Process: The preliminary plan shall be circulated to all reviewing departments for comments. The Department of Community and Economic Development shall evaluate whether the plans comply with the development policies of the Renton Comprehensive Plan and this Section and shall make a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner accordingly. 8. Decision: a. Preliminary Planned Urban Development — New Development: After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall contain an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units of the planned urban development, and any phases thereof, as well as the effective date of approval and the date of expiration of such approval. b. Preliminary Planned Urban Development — Existing Development with Binding Site Plan: After public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plan. The preliminary plan shall 26 ORDINANCE NO. contain an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses and number of units of the planned urban development, and any phases thereof, as well as the effective date of approval and the date of expiration of such approval, on its face prior to recording with King County. 9. Effect of an Approved Preliminary Plan: The approval of a preliminary plan constitutes the City's acceptance of the general project, including its density, intensity, arrangement and design. Approval authorizes the applicant or subsequent owner to apply for final plan approval of the planned urban development or phase(s) thereof. Preliminary plan approval does not authorize any building permits or any site work without appropriate permits. An approved preliminary plan binds the future planned urban development site and all subsequent owners to the uses, densities, and standards of the preliminary plan until such time as a final plan is approved for the entire site or all phases of the site, or a new preliminary plan is approved, or the preliminary plan is abandoned in writing or expires subject to the provisions of subsections G and K of this Section. 10. Zoning Map Revised: a. New Planned Urban Development Approval: Upon the authority of the approval ordinance of a preliminary planned urban development, the City shall place the planned urban development land use file number as an overlay on the subject property on the City of Renton Zoning Map. 27 ORDINANCE NO. b. Demonstration Ordinances: Ordinances 4468 and 4550 which created demonstration developments known as Village on Union and certain divisions of the Orchards are hereby considered final planned urban developments for the purposes of code implementation. SECTION Lill. Subsection 4-9-150G.1, Time Limits, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Time Limits: The developer shall, within two (2) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner to approve the preliminary plan, submit to the Department of Community and Economic Development a final development plan showing the ultimate design and specific details of the proposed planned urban development or the final phase or phases thereof. Upon application by the developer, the Hearing Examiner may grant an extension of the approved preliminary plan for a maximum of twelve (12) months. Application for such extension shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of preliminary plan approval. Only one such extension may be granted for a planned urban development. If a final development plan is not filed within such two (2) years or within the extended time period, if any, the planned urban development preliminary plan shall be deemed to have expired or been abandoned. To activate an expired or abandoned planned urban development a new application is required. 28 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION LIV. Subsection 4-9-150G.2, Submittal Requirements and Fees for Final Plan Application, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Submittal Requirements and Fees for Final Plan Application: A final plan application shall be submitted for a planned urban development, or a phase thereof, to the Department of Community and Economic Development. The proposed final plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plans, including phasing, subject to the provisions of subsections G4 and G5 of this Section. Submittal requirements shall be as listed in RMC 4-8- 120C, Land Use Applications. Application fees shall be as listed in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. SECTION LV. Subsection 4-9-150G.6, Review and Approval of Final Plan, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Review and Approval of Final Plan: The final plan shall be reviewed by the applicable City departments, in the manner prescribed for preliminary plans, to determine if the final plan is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plan and is consistent with the purposes and review criteria of this Section. The Planning Director shall make a decision to approve, approve with conditions or deny the final plan. The decision shall include a description of the 29 ORDINANCE NO. elements of the approved planned urban development, including land uses, number of units, phasing, the effective date of approval and of expiration, time limits, required improvements and the schedule for implementation, and any conditions that may apply to the planned urban development. a. Covenants Required: i. Covenants Generally: As a condition of final planned urban development approval, covenants shall be executed that run with the land, and with all subdivided portions thereof, stating that such property is part of an approved planned urban development, and including the file number thereof and a description of the uses, densities and phases of the approved planned urban development. Such covenant shall also be recorded for each property created through any subsequent subdivisions. ii. Specifications of Variations: All final planned urban developments shall include specifications that are recorded with the planned urban development indicating which lots or structures vary from which specific zoning requirement. Covenants shall indicate that such lots or structures shall meet the standard created with the approval of the planned urban development or the current zone in effect at the time of subsequent land use, building or construction permits. b. Property owners' Association Required: For residential planned urban developments, the developer or owner(s) of a planned urban development shall be required to form a legally incorporated property owners' 30 ORDINANCE NO. association prior to the occupancy of any portion of a planned urban development. If there is only one owner of the planned urban development, either a property owners' association shall be formed or a covenant running with the land shall be filed requiring the formation of such an association prior to the first subsequent sale of the property, or portion thereof. For nonresidential planned urban developments, the City may establish covenants as necessary to ensure maintenance of infrastructure and open space or other common improvements. SECTION LVI. Subsection 4-9-150G.8.a, Expiration, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. Expiration: The applicant shall prepare and submit building permit applications which are accepted as substantially complete to the Department of Community and Economic Development within six (6) months of the effective date of approval. The developer shall complete the approved planned urban development or any phase thereof included in the approved final plan within two (2) years from the date of the decision to approve the final plan by the Planning Director, unless a shorter time is designated. Failure to complete the planned urban development, or any phase thereof, within this time limit will require the submittal of a new preliminary and final plan application in order to continue construction of the planned urban development. Failure to submit a new application or to complete the planned urban development once 31 ORDINANCE NO. construction has begun shall constitute abandonment of the planned urban development subject to subsection J of this Section. Expiration of any building permit issued for a planned urban development shall be governed by the provisions of the applicable Building Code. Construction of any portion of the planned urban development requires a current approved planned urban development and a current building permit. SECTION LVII. Subsection 4-9-1501, Appeals of Examiner's Decision on a Final Planned Urban Development, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: I. APPEALS OF EXAMINER'S DECISION ON A FINAL PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT: The Planning Directors decision on a final planned urban development may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to RMC 4-8-110. If the Hearing Examiner acts on appeal to approve a final planned urban development, the decision will include an effective date of approval consistent with subsections G and K of this Section. SECTION LVIII. Subsection 4-9-150K.1, Expiration, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Expiration: Expiration of an approved preliminary plan shall be defined as failure to satisfy the time limits or other requirements of submitting a final plan 32 ORDINANCE NO. application. Expiration of an approved final plan planned urban development shall be defined as failure to initiate construction of a planned urban development. Expiration can only occur if no on -site construction has begun or a lack of significant progress under those building permits has occurred. Upon expiration of a preliminary or final plan, the undeveloped site may only be developed if a new preliminary and final plan planned urban development is approved or if the Hearing Examiner removes the planned urban development designation and revokes the original approval. SECTION LIX. Subsection 4-9-150L, Appeal of Council Decision on Planned Urban Development, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections re -lettered accordingly. SECTION LX. Subsection 4-9-250B.1, Authority and Applicability, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Authority and Applicability for Administrative Variances: The Community and Economic Development Administrator and/or designee shall have the authority to grant variances from the following development standards when no other permit or approval requires Hearing Examiner Review: a. Residential Land Uses: Lot width, lot depth, setbacks, allowed projections into setbacks, and lot coverage. Lot width, lot depth, and setback 33 ORDINANCE NO. variations do not require a variance if the request is part of a stream daylighting proposal and meets criteria in RMC 4-3-050L; and b. Commercial and Industrial Land Uses: Screening of surface -mounted equipment and screening of roof -mounted equipment. c. Proposals Located Within Critical Areas: i. Aquifer Protection Areas: If an applicant feels that the strict application of aquifer protection regulations would deny all reasonable use of the property or would deny installation of public transportation or utility facilities determined by the public agency proposing these facilities to be in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare, the applicant of a development proposal may apply for a variance. ii. Flood Hazards: Variances from the flood hazard requirements of RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations. iii. Steep Slopes Forty Percent (40%) or Greater and Very High Landslide Hazards: The construction of one single family home on a pre-existing platted lot where there is not enough developable area elsewhere on the site to accommodate building pads and provide practical off-street parking. vi. Wetlands: (a) Creation/restoration/enhancement ratios: Categories 1 and 2. (b) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050M6e and M6f: Category 3. 34 ORDINANCE NO. (c) A new or expanded single family residence on an existing, legal lot, having a regulated Category 3 wetland. (d) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050M6e and M6f — Category 1 or 2. v. Streams and Lakes: (a) A new or expanded single family residence on a pre-existing platted lot where there is not enough developable area elsewhere on the site to accommodate building pads and provide practical off-street parking, providing reasonable use of the property. (b) Buffer width reductions not otherwise authorized by RMC 4-3- 050L, Streams and Lakes (Class 2 to 4). (c) Activities proposing to vary from stream regulations not listed elsewhere in subsection B1a of this Section, and authorized to be requested as variances in RMC 4-3-050L. vi. General: Public/quasi-public utility or agency proposing to alter aquifer protection, geologic hazard, habitat or wetlands regulations not listed above. SECTION LXI. Subsection 4-9-250B.7, Special Review Criteria for Variances from Aquifer Protection Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 35 ORDINANCE NO. 7. Special Review Criteria for Variances from the Aquifer Protection Regulations: Except for public or quasi -public utility or agency proposals which are subject to subsection 1310 of this Section, the following criteria shall be considered, in addition to those criteria in subsections B5 and B6 of this Section, for variances from aquifer protection regulations: a. That the proposed activities will not cause significant degradation of groundwater or surface water quality; and b. That the applicant has taken deliberate measures to minimize aquifer impacts, including but not limited to the following: i. Limiting the degree or magnitude of the hazardous material and activity; and and ii. Limiting the implementation of the hazardous material and activity; iii. Using appropriate and best available technology; and iv. Taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; and c. That there will be no damage to nearby public or private property and no threat to the health or safety of people on or off the property; and d. The proposed variance is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-25OF are followed. SECTION LXII. Subsection 4-9-250B.8, Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title 36 ORDINANCE NO. IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "8. Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations:" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-250B.8.a - e shall remain as currently codified, except as amended in Sections LXIII and LXIV of this ordinance. 8. Special Review Criteria for Variances from Flood Hazard Requirements in the Critical Areas Regulations: In lieu of the variance criteria of subsection B5 of this Section, the following directives and criteria shall be utilized by the Reviewing Official in the review of variance applications related to the flood hazard requirements of the critical areas regulations: SECTION LXI11. Subsection 4-9-250B.8.b, Review Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the first sentence following the subsection heading "b. Review. Criteria" is amended to read as shown below. Subsections 4-9-B.8.b.i - vi shall remain as currently codified. b. Review Criteria: In passing upon such an application for a variance, the Reviewing Official shall consider the following review criteria: SECTION LXIV. Subsection 4-9-250B.8.c, Conditions of Approval, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 37 ORDINANCE NO. c. Conditions of Approval: Upon consideration of the factors of subsection 138b of this Section, and the purposes of this Section, the Reviewing Official may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this Section. SECTION LXV. Subsection a of subsection 4-9-250B.9, Special Review Criteria — Single Family Residence on a Legal Lot with a Category 3 Wetland; or Single Family Residence on a Legal Lot with a Class 2, 3, or 4 Stream/Lake, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: a. The proposal is the minimum necessary to accommodate the building footprint and access. In no case, however, shall the impervious surface exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet, including access. Otherwise the alteration shall be subject to the review criteria of subsection B6 of this Section; SECTION LXVI. Subsection i of subsection 4-9-25013.10, Special Review Criteria — Public/Quasi-Public Utility or Agency Altering Aquifer Protection, Geologic Hazard, Habitat, Stream/Lake or Wetland Regulations, of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: i. The approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose; and 38 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION LXVI1. Section 4-11-160, Definitions P, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add the definition of "Planning Director" to read as follows: PLANNING DIRECTOR: The individual under the direction of the Community and Economic Development Administrator who plans, organizes, coordinates and directs the City's Planning Division, including the development and adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and development regulations. Additionally, the Planning Director is responsible for application and enforcement of the City's zoning, shoreline management, and environmental ordinances, review and processing of all land use subdivision permit applications. SECTION LXVIII. Section 4-11-260, Definitions Z, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to delete the definition of "Zoning Administrator". SECTION LXIX. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (S) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 39 r read,A z/7/toe 7 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. .JT ,,20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4 CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON-, TO CLARIFY LANGUAGE RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL UNIT TYPES, RESIDENTIAL USES, AND LOTS, PARCELS, AND TRACTS. '8% 3 o �a_iy-U9 WHEREAS, the City has utilized a variety of terms in describing residential uses and residential types in its development regulations, including such terms as "detached dwelling", "semi -attached dwelling", "attached dwelling", "multi -family dwelling", "single-family dwelling", "townhouse", "accessory dwelling unit", "assisted living", "flats," and "garden style apartments"; and WHEREAS, the use of these terms should be more precisely defined to create a distinction between residential uses and residential styles or types; and WHEREAS, the term "semi -attached dwelling" is unique to the City's development regulations, and is confusing to applicants and the public; and WHEREAS, the term "existing legal" is another unique term to the City's development regulations, created to exempt existing residential development from non -conforming status when development regulations were changed; and WHEREAS, the term "existing legal" is redundant because exemptions in the development standards table accomplish the same intended effect; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, there are currently two, conflicting definitions of "lot", but no definitions of "tract" or "parcel"; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the development regulation text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-020G, Residential-10 DU/Acre (R-10), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: G. RESIDENTIAL-10 DU/ACRE (R-10): The Residential-10 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre Zone (R-10) is established for medium -density residential development that will provide a mix of residential styles including small lot detached dwellings or attached dwellings such as townhouses and small-scale flats. ' Development promoted in the zone is intended to increase opportunities for detached dwellings as a percent of the housing stock, as well as allow some small-scale attached housing choices and to 2 ORDINANCE NO. create high -quality infill development that increases density while maintaining the single family character of the existing neighborhood. Allowable base densities range from four (4) to ten (10) dwelling units per net acre. The zone serves as a transition to higher density multi -family zones. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-020H, Residential-14 DU/Acre (R-14), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: H. RESIDENTIAL-14 DU/ACRE (R-14): The purpose of the Residential-14 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre Zone (R-14) is to encourage development, and redevelopment, of residential neighborhoods that provide a mix of detached and attached dwelling structures organized and designed to combine characteristics of both typical single family and small-scale multi -family developments. Densities range from ten (10) to fourteen (14) units per net acre with opportunities for bonuses up to eighteen (18) dwelling units per net acre. Structure size is intended to be limited in terms of bulk and scale so that the various unit types allowed in the zone are compatible with one another and can be integrated together into a quality neighborhood. Project features are encouraged, such as yards for private use, common open spaces, and landscaped areas that enhance a neighborhood and foster a sense of community. Civic and limited commercial uses may be allowed when they support the purpose of the designation. 3 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION Ill. Subsection 4-2-060C, Residential, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown on Attachment A. SECTION IV. Note 16 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 16. Residential uses shall not be located along the street frontage on the ground floor in the "Downtown Pedestrian District". SECTION V. Note 18 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 18. a. General Requirements: Only permitted within a structure containing commercial uses on the ground floor. Commercial space must be reserved on the ground floor at a minimum of thirty feet (30') in depth along any street frontage. Residential uses shall not be located on the ground floor, except for a residential entry feature linking the residential portion of the development to the street. 4 ORDINANCE NO. b. Employment Area Valley: Residential uses are not permitted in the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation. See EAV Map in RMC 4- 2-080B. SECTION VI. Note 19 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 19. No new development of this use is allowed. However, existing uses of this type are permitted as an existing legal use per RMC 4-2-050C.8. SECTION VII. Note 50 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted in its entirety and reserved for future use. SECTION VIII. Note 73 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 73. Garden style apartments are prohibited. Within the Center Village Zone, ground floor commercial development at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the frontage of the building is required for all residential projects on parcels abutting NE sunset Boulevard east of Harrington Avenue NE. 5 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IX. Note 74 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 74. Flats are only permitted if part of a mixed use structure with ground - floor commercial. SECTION X. Note 87 of subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 87. Not allowed within one thousand feet (1000') of the centerline of Renton Municipal Airport runway. Permitted as mixed use structures with ground -floor commercial except that parcels may be developed exclusively for attached dwelling units if: a. The entire frontage of the block is residential, b. Support facilities such as exercise facilities, lobbies, etc., face the street frontage and living areas are in the rear, or c. Entries to attached dwelling units are slightly elevated above the sidewalk level. SECTION XI. The subsection entitled "Height" of subsection 4-2-120E, Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of R ORDINANCE NO. General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown in Attachment B. All other portions of this table are to remain the same except as amended in Section XII of this ordinance. SECTION XII. The subsection entitled "Parking and Loading" of subsection 4-2- 120E, Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown in Attachment C. All other portions of this table are to remain the same, except as amended in Section XI of this ordinance. SECTION XII1. Subsection 4-4-080E.1.a, Detached, Semi -Attached and Two (2) Attached Dwellings, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to change the title to "Detached and Two (2) Attached Dwellings", and to read as follows: a. Detached and Two (2) Attached Dwellings: On the same lot with the building they are required to serve. SECTION XIV. The subsection entitled "Residential Uses Outside of Center Downtown Zone" of the table in subsection 4-4-080F.10.e, Parking Spaces Required Based on Land Use, of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended as shown in Attachment D. All other portions of the table are to remain the same. 7 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XV. The row entitled "Architectural Plans, Detached/Semi-Attached Dwellings and 2 Attached Dwellings" of subsection 4-8-120B, Building Applications, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to eliminate the words "Semi -Attached Dwelling", as shown below. All other portions of the row and table are to remain the same. Architectural Plans, Detached and 2 1 1 Attached Dwellings k 12_] SECTION XVI. Subsection 4-8-120D.1, Definitions A, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Architectural Plans, Detached Dwellings, Semi -Attached Dwellings, and Two (2) Attached Dwellings" is hereby amended to read as follows: Architectural Plans, Detached Dwellings and Two (2) Attached Dwellings: An eighteen inch by twenty four inch (18" x 24"), minimum, plan drawn at a scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot (1/4" = 1') (or other size or scale approved by the Building Official) clearly indicating the information required by the "Permits" section of the currently adopted International Building Code and chapter 19.27 RCW (State Building Code Act, Statewide amendments), including, but not limited to, the following: a. General building layout and room use, b. Window and door size and window ventilation area, P ORDINANCE NO. c. Plumbing, duct, and electrical layout, d. Opening headers, size and material, e. Cross section details, as needed, to show typical foundation, floor, wall, ceiling and roof construction, including connection details, f. Structural members labeled as to size and spacing as well as bracing, blocking, bridging, special connectors, and anchor bolts, and g. Special details as needed, (i.e., stairs, fireplaces, special construction), h. Insulation of walls, slab, floors, and roof/ceiling. SECTION XVII. Subsection 4-9-150D.2.d.v, Alleys, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: v. Alleys: Provides alleys to at least fifty percent (50%) of any proposed detached or attached units with individual, private ground related entries. SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4-9-150D.3.a.ii, Interior Design, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: ii. Interior Design: Promotes a coordinated site and building design. Buildings in groups should be related by coordinated materials and roof styles, but contrast should be provided throughout a site by the use of varied materials, architectural detailing, building orientation or housing type; e.g., single family, townhouses, flats, etc. 9 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIX. Subsection 4-9-200C, Exemptions, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: C. EXEMPTIONS: 1. Development Exempt from Master Plan Review: a. UC-N1 and UC-N2 Zones Only: i. Airplane Manufacturing and Airplane Manufacturing Accessory Functions: New structures, rehabilitation of existing structures, or lot. line adjustments for airplane manufacturing and airplane manufacturing accessory functions within the UC-N1 and UC-N2 Zones. ii. Other Uses: Subdivision, lot line adjustment or other method of adjusting lot configurations that result in lots larger than twenty five (25) acres in size. iii. Other Exemptions in the UC-N1 and UC-N2 Zones: Other exemptions are listed in subsection C1b of this Section. b. COR, UC-N1, and UC-N2 Zones: i. Interior remodels. ii. Facade Modifications: Facade modifications such as the location of entrances/exits, the location of windows, changes in signage, or aesthetic alterations. iii. Exterior remodeling or expansion of an existing detached and/or primary residence, excluding the addition of a new dwelling unit(s). 10 ORDINANCE NO. iv. All development categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (chapters 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC) and under RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review Procedures. v. Utilities: Underground utility projects. vi. Additional exemptions for the R-10 Zone are listed in subsections C2c and C2d of this Section. vii. Additional exemptions for the R-14 Zone are listed in subsection C2c of this Section. 2. Development Exempt from Site Plan Review: a. In the RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, RMH, RM, CO, CA, CN, CV, CD, IL, IM, and IH zones, the following types of development shall be exempt from the requirements of site plan review: L Interior remodel of existing buildings or structures. ii. Facade modifications such as the location of entrances/exits; the location of windows; changes in signage; or aesthetic alterations. iii. Planned unit developments. iv. All development categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC) and under RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review Procedures. v. Underground utility projects. 11 ORDINANCE NO. b. In the R-10, R-14, COR, and UC-N1 and UC-N2 zones, the following types of development shall be exempt from the requirements of site plan review: i. Interior remodel of existing buildings or structures. ii. Facade modifications such as the location of entrances/exits, the location of windows, changes in signage, or aesthetic alterations. iii. Exterior remodeling or expansion of an existing detached or semi - attached home and/or primary residence, excluding the addition of a new dwelling unit(s). iv. All development categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC) and under RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review Procedures. v. Underground utility projects. c. In the R-10 and R-14 Zones, the following types of development shall be exempt from the requirements of Site Plan Review: platted lot. i. New or replacement detached homes on a single previously ii. Planned unit developments. iii. Development of detached dwelling units on legal lots where part of a subdivision application. d. In the R-10 Zone, the following types of development shall be exempt from the requirements of site plan review: all development categorically exempt 12 ORDINANCE NO. from the State Environmental Policy Act (chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197- 11 WAC) and under RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review Procedures, excluding shadow platting of two (2) or more units per RMC 4-2-110F. SECTION XX. Subsection i of subsection 4-9-200D.2.b, Large Project Scale, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: i. One hundred (100) attached residential units; or SECTION XXI. Section 4-11-010, Definitions A, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Assisted Living" is amended to read as follows: ASSISTED LIVING: A facility containing two (2) or more dwelling units where residents live in private units and receive assistance with limited aspects of personal care, such as taking medication, bathing, or dressing. Staff is on duty twenty-four (24) hours per day to ensure the welfare and safety of residents. Dwelling units include a full kitchen (sink, oven or range, and refrigerator) or a kitchenette, a bathroom, a living area, and may include a call system. On the premises, facilities include: a professional kitchen, common dining room, recreation are a(s), activity room, and a- laundry area. Meals may be provided multiple times daily in a common dining area. This definition does not include: 13 ORDINANCE NO. convalescent centers, congregate residences, boarding and lodging houses, adult family homes, and group homes I and II. SECTION XXII. Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Dwelling, Multi -Family" is amended to read as follows: DWELLING, MULTI -FAMILY: A building containing more than one dwelling unit. This definition includes attached dwellings and assisted living. This definition does not include boarding and lodging houses, accessory dwelling units, adult family homes, group home I, or group home If. SECTION XXIII. Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition in alphabetical order for "Dwelling, Attached", to read as follows: DWELLING, ATTACHED: A dwelling unit connected to one or more dwellings by common roofs, walls, or floors or a dwelling unit or units attached to garages or other nonresidential uses. This definition does not include assisted living, boarding and lodging houses, accessory dwelling units, adult family homes, group home I or group home II as defined herein. Attached dwellings include the following types: A. Flat: A residential building containing two (2) or more dwelling units which are attached at one or more common roofs, walls, or floors. Typically, the 14 ORDINANCE NO. unit's habitable area is provided on a single level. Unit entrances may or may not be provided from a common corridor. B. Townhouse: A one -family, ground -related dwelling attached to one or more such units in which each unit has its own exterior, ground -level access to the outside, no unit is located over another unit, and each unit is separated from any other unit by one or more vertical common walls. Townhouse units may be multi -story. C. Carriage House: One or more dwelling units attached to a garage. The garage attached to the carriage house typically contains vehicles and/or storage for people living in another building as well as occupants of the carriage house. D. Penthouse: A single dwelling unit located at or near the top of a building containing other, nonresidential uses. E. Garden Style Apartment: A dwelling unit that is one of several stacked vertically, with exterior stairways and/or exterior corridors and surface parking. Parking is not structured and may include detached carports or garages. Buildings and building entries are oriented toward internal drive aisles and/or parking lots and not street frontage. There is typically no formal building entry area connected to a public sidewalk and a public street. Site planning may incorporate structures developed at low landscaped setbacks. SECTION XXIV. Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11,-Definitions, of -Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the 15 ORDINANCE NO. City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition in alphabetical order for "Dwelling, Detached", to read as follows: DWELLING, DETACHED: A building containing one dwelling unit which is not attached to any other dwelling by any means except fences, has a permanent foundation, and is surrounded by open space or yards. Also called a single- family dwelling. This definition does not include accessory dwelling units. SECTION XXV. Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Dwelling, Single -Family" of is deleted. SECTION XXVI. Section 4-11-060, Definitions F, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Flat" is amended to read as follows: FLAT: See DWELLING, ATTACHED. SECTION XXVII. Section 4-11-070, Definitions G, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so the definition of "Garden Style Apartments" is amended to read as follows: GARDEN STYLE APARTMENTS: See DWELLING, ATTACHED. - SECTION XXVIII. Section 4-11-120, Definitions L, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the 16 ORDINANCE NO. City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the two definitions of "Lot" of are replaced with one definition, to read as follows: LOT: A physically separate and distinct property that has been created pursuant to the provisions of this title, or pursuant to any previous laws governing the subdivision, short subdivision, or segregation of land. This definition excludes tracts and parcels. See LOT TYPES. SECTION XXIX. Section 4-11-160, Definitions P, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition in alphabetical order for "Parcel", to read as follows: PARCEL: A unit of land created specifically for the purpose of tax collection. SECTION XXX. Section 4-11-200, Definitions T, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add in alphabetical order a definition of "Tract", to read as follows: TRACT: An area of land that meets one of the following circumstances: a. A physically separate and distinct property created pursuant to the provisions of this title, or pursuant to any previous laws governing the subdivision, short subdivision, or segregation of land created expressly to provide a common benefit or public purpose, including, but not limited to land - provided for: storm water management, critical areas protection, utilities, recreation, or open space. Such tracts shall be unbuildable, except for the 17 ORDINANCE NO. structures and infrastructure necessary to fulfill the common benefit or public purpose for which the tract was created; or b. A physically separate and distinct property that was not created pursuant to the provisions of this title, nor pursuant to any previous laws governing the subdivision, short subdivision, or segregation of land. Such tracts shall be unbuildable unless converted into a lot pursuant to the provisions of this title. SECTION XXXI. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (S) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of .2009. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1608:11/30/09:scr Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of 12009. Denis Law, Mayor 18 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. Uses: rl d 00 = Z o O O e1 Z N Z cc z J U U v > C. RESIDENTIAL Detached dwelling p P P P P P P P P 19 19 19 Attached dwellings P P P P P P P P P P P P P 19 19 19 73 73 18 73 18 16 74 87 Manufactured Homes Manufactured Homes P 19 Manufactured Homes, P P P P P P P designated 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Mobile Homes P 19 19 Attachment B ORDINANCE NO. UC-N1 UC-N2 HEIGHT Maximum Building 10 stories along primary and 10 stories along primary and Height secondary arterials.) 6 stories secondary arterials.) 6 stories along residential/minor along residential/minor collectors.' collectors.' Townhouses only: 3 stories. Maximum Height for See RMC 4-4-140G. See RMC 4-4-140G. Wireless Communication Facilities 20 Attachment C ORDINANCE NO. UC-N1 UC-N2 PARKING AND LOADING General, See RMC 4-4-080 and 10-10-13. See RMC 4-4-080 and 10-10-13. Required On a Pedestrian -Oriented Street: On a Pedestrian -Oriented Street: Location for Parking may not be located between Parking may not be located between Accessory or the proposed building associated with the proposed building associated with Existing parking and pedestrian -oriented public parking and pedestrian -oriented public Parking streets unless located within a streets unless located within a structured parking garage. structured parking garage. On Other Arterials, Local Streets, and On Other Arterials, Local Streets, and Internal Streets: All residential parking Internal Streets: All residential parking shall be structured parking except shall be structured parking except parking required for guests. Parking parking required for guests. Parking for all uses shall be located consistent for all uses shall be located consistent with RMC 4-3-100, Urban Center with RMC 4-3-100, Urban Center Design Overlay regulations. Site Design Overlay regulations. Site planning must demonstrate feasible planning must demonstrate feasible future location of structured parking future location of structured parking to accommodate infill development. to accommodate infill development. 21 Attachment D ORDINANCE NO. USE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SPACES RESIDENTIAL USES OUTSIDE OF CENTER DOWNTOWN ZONE: Detached dwellings in A minimum of 2 per dwelling unit. Tandem parking is allowed. A all other zones: maximum of 4 vehicles may be parked on a lot, including those vehicles under repair and restoration, unless kept within an enclosed building. Manufactured homes A minimum of 2 per manufactured home site, plus a screened parking within a area shall be provided for boats, campers, travel trailers and related manufactured home devices at a ratio of 1 screened space per 10 units. A maximum of 4 park: vehicles may be parked on a lot, including those vehicles under repair and restoration, unless kept within an enclosed building. Congregate 1 per sleeping room and 1 for the proprietor, plus 1 additional space residences: for each 4 persons employed on the premises. Assisted living: 1 space per residential unit of assisted living, plus dedicated sparking spaces for facility fleet vehicles. Attached dwelling in 1.8 per 3 bedroom or larger dwelling unit; RM-U, RM-T, UC-N1, and UC-N2 Zones: 1.6 per 2 bedroom dwelling unit; 1.2 per 1 bedroom or studio dwelling unit. RM-T Zone Exemption: An exemption to the standard parking ratio formula may be granted by the Planning Director allowing 1 parking space per dwelling unit for developments of less than 5 dwelling units with 2 bedrooms or less per unit, provided adequate on -street parking is available in the vicinity of the development. Attached dwellings 2 per dwelling unit where tandem spaces are not provided; and /or within the RM-F Zone: 2.5 per dwelling unit where tandem parking is provided, subject to the criteria found in subsection F8d of this Section. Attached dwellings 1 per dwelling unit is required. A maximum of 1.75 per dwelling unit is within the CA or CV allowed. Zones: Attached dwellings 1.75 per dwelling unit where tandem spaces are not provided; and/or within all other Zones: 2.25 per dwelling unit where tandem parking is provided, subject to the criteria found in subsection F8d of this Section. Attached dwellings 1 for each 4 dwelling units. within all other Zones: 22 l sf ZJ-7 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON TO AMEND THE REGULATIONS REGARDING PROPERTY ANNEXED TO THE CITY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL IN COUNTY. 1?-3 y WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to preserve the right to develop a parcel under the vested densities of an approved King County application once annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that vested rights are intended to provide a measure of certainty to land use applicants and to protect their expectations against fluctuating land use policy; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES -ORDAIN AS -FOLLOWS: - - SECTION I. Section 4-7-090, Properties Annexed to the City with Preliminary Approval in County, of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV (Development 1 ORDINANCE NO. Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby deleted in its entirety and hereby reserved for future use. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1610:11/19/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 2 is-iyoy CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON - ORDINANCE NO. 6�6_,AA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO ALLOW HELIPADS AS PART OF A MEDICAL INSTITUTION USE AND REMOVE THE USE FROM THE COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) ZONE. j)-10 WHEREAS, the City Council amended the zoning code to allow the limited use of helipads in the R-8 zone in 2008; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council recommended that the Planning Division review helipads as a use city-wide as part of the 2009 Title IV docket; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended no change to the existing regulations for helipad use; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council duly considered the Planning Commission's recommendation and recommended allowing helipads as part of a medical institution use, and excluding them from the Commercial Arterial zone; and WHEREAS, the development regulation text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; 1 ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection entitled "Air Transportation Uses" of subsection 4-2-060L, Vehicle Related Activities, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended, as shown in Attachment A. All other portions of the table remain as currently codified. SECTION 11. Section 4-11-130, Definitions M, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Medical Institutions" reads as follows: MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS: Facilities providing physical or mental health services, in -patient accommodations, and medical or surgical care of the sick or injured. Medical institutions are allowed one helipad as an accessory use, if functionally and architecturally integrated into the primary use, regardless of the treatment of helipads in the underlying zoning. This definition includes hospitals, clinics, hospices, holistic health centers, and nursing homes as defined in Group 1-2 of the IFC. This definition excludes medical and dental offices, convalescent centers, assisted living, and group homes I and II. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. 2 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1612:11/19/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 3 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. USES: o et .1 le oo J = U U U U U 0 UU D D Z Airplane Manufacturing H59 p Airplane manufacturing, AC AC accessory functions Airplane Sales and Repair p Airport, Municipal) p Airport -related uses i AC Aviation -related uses AC Helipads P H H38 H38 H H H 111 97 Helipads, commercial H H 97