HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda PacketAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
January 13, 2003
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Renton School District Construction Bond Election Information
b. WSDOT Culvert Replacement Project on SR-167
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
Moratorium on development beyond State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) thresholds in the
Heavy Industrial (IH) Zone
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 6, 2003. Council concur.
b. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department requests approval
for the following members to serve on the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: Rick
Meinig, Silver Cloud Inn General Manager; Terry Godat, Travelers Inn General Manager
(nominated to fill the position vacated by Holiday Inn Select General Manager, Howard Cohen);
Suzette Cooke, President of the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce; Julie Brewer, City of
Renton Community Relations Manager; and King Parker, City of Renton Councilmember.
Council concur.
c. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends
approval of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee recommendation to allocate $80,000
of hotel/motel tax revenues to the Renton Lodging Association for its 2003 tourism marketing
efforts. Authorization is also sought to execute a contract with the Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce for year four of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional effort. Refer
to Finance Committee.
d. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends
approval of a contract with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership for year five of the
Renton Community Marketing Campaign. Approval is also sought to allocate hotel/motel tax
revenues in the amount of $20,000 to the key community stakeholders partnership for a fourth
year of the marketing campaign; and $30,000 for the proposed Renton Barbecue & Blues
Festival to be held in downtown Renton in September, 2003. Refer to Finance Committee.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE).
e. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a
public hearing be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution calling for an annexation election,
and the proposed prezoning of R-8 for the proposed Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by SE
47th St. to the north, SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Council concur.
f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a
public hearing be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution calling for an annexation election,
and the proposed prezoning of R-8 for the proposed Vuong Annexation; 2.7 acres located east of
Anacortes Ave. NE and north of NE loth St. Council concur.
g. Finance & Information Services Department requests authorization to fill the Finance Analyst H
position at Step D of the salary range effective 1/1/2003. Refer to Finance Committee.
h. Human Services Division recommends approval of an agreement with South King County cities
for the planning, funding, and implementation of a joint human services application and funding
program. The City's cost share is $67,300. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
8. CORRESPONDENCE
9. OLD BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the chairman if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Review of City's Property & Liability Claims; Modification to
City's Healthcare Plan; Community Development Block Grant Specialist Hire at Step E
10. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Title IV (Development Regulations) Changes (1st reading 1/6/2003)
b. Utility Fee Code Amendments (1st reading 1/6/2003)
11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
12. AUDIENCE COMMENT
13. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
CANCELLED
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRi. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
14
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
January 13, 2003
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the
meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TERRI BRIERE; KING
COUNCILMEMBERS
PARKER; DON PERSSON; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; DAN
CLAWSON.
CITY STAFF IN
JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE
LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk;
GREGG Z MMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; JIM
SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator; MIKE WEBBY, Human
Resources Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Acting Economic Development
Administrator; REBECCA LIND, Planner Manager; DEREK TODD, Assistant
to the CAO; COMMANDER -KEVIN MILOSEVICH, Police Department.
SPECIAL
Renton School District Superintendent Dr. Dolores Gibbons announced that the
PRESENTATIONS
Renton School District school construction bond election will be held on
School District: School
February 4, 2003. She explained that the $150 million bond issue will fund
Construction Bond Election,
phase III of the district's 20-year facilities plan to renovate, renew or rebuild
February 4, 2003
every building in the district. Phase III includes the replacement of Benson
Hill, Hazelwood, Kennydale, and Renton Park Elementary Schools; technology
improvements; safety upgrades; energy conservation; and other continued
improvements.
Dr. Gibbons stated that the school improvements will be paid for with an
estimated tax rate increase of approximately 60 cents per $1,000 of assessed
property value. If the bond measure is passed, the total tax rate, including this
bond, previous bonds and the voter -approved education levy, will be an
estimated $3.76 per $1,000 of assessed property value. Dr. Gibbons noted that
the Renton School District tax rate is among the lowest in the region. In
conclusion, she explained that the district is pursuing the measure at this time
for the following reasons: interest rates are low; construction costs continue to
increase with inflation every year; capital improvements will allow
maintenance expenses to be reduced; and economic development.
WSDOT: SR-167 Springbrook Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, reported
Creek Culvert Replacement that the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) plans to
Project replace the Springbrook Creek Culvert, located within the jurisdiction of the
cities of Renton and Kent under SR-167 at S. 192nd St. ,(S. 55th St. in Renton).
Stating that the project involves a three-day closure of SR-167 in August, Mr.
Zimmerman noted that WSDOT is in the process of obtaining the necessary
permits, including a 14-day noise variance.
Mr. Zimmerman introduced WSDOT representatives Amjad Omar and Mark
Sawyer who gave a briefing on the matter. Explaining that the purpose of the
culvert replacement is to control flooding and improve fish passage, Mr. Omar
stated that the replacement will require a three-day weekend closure of SR-167
in August, in addition to partial lane closures. Mr. Omar said that the month of
August is proposed for the project because the stream is at its lowest flow and
they are fewer activities scheduled that month (Puyallup Fair occurs in
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 18 �r
w
September, and the Seafair festival and Renton River Days occur in July). He
affirmed that WSDOT has submitted a 14-day noise variance application for
consideration by the Board of Public .Works on January 22nd.
Explaining that a three-day closure is proposed so as to impact traffic on only
one weekend, Mr. Sawyer stated that SR-167 is to be closed from 11:00 p.m.
Friday until 5:00 a.m. Monday. Mr. Omar described the detour routes, and
emphasized that prior to the event, the traffic disruptions and closure will be
advertised profusely by the media as well as with portable traffic signs.
In response to Council inquiry, Mr. Zimmerman stated that SW 43rd St. is
estimated to open in May.
Responding to Council inquiries, Mr. Omar said that weather conditions will
dictate which weekend in August the closure will occur. He confirmed that one
lane will always remain open during the times of partial lane closures.
In answer to concerns regarding whether the detour routes can handle the traffic
during the full closure of SR-167, Mr. Sawyer stated that there are a number of
alternate routes available, and through abundant advertising, WSDOT will
inform the public of those alternative routes.
Councilmembers Persson and Keolker-Wheeler expressed concerns regarding
the impact of the SR-167 closure on local businesses such as IKEA, especially
since the area has been already impacted by the closure of SW 43rd St. Mayor
Tanner noted that the closure would impact Kent more than Renton, and
pointed out that IKEA will still be readily accessible via the detour routes.
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry about traffic enforcement, Mr.
Omar stated that State troopers would be directing traffic during the full closure
of SR-167. Councilman Persson stressed the importance of having 24-hour-a-
day manual traffic control during the closure.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL REFER THE SR-167 SPRINGBROOK CREEK CULVERT
REPLACEMENT PROJECT ISSUE TO THE TRANSPORTATION
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Planning: Heavy Industrial accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing
Zone Development to consider the six-month moratorium on development beyond State
Moratorium Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) thresholds in the Heavy Industrial (III)
zone.
Alex Pietsch, Acting Economic Development Administrator, explained that the
Growth Management Act (GMA) mandates the review of Comprehensive
Plans, and Council must adopt a revised Comprehensive Plan by December,
2004. After review of the City's current Comprehensive Plan, key issues such
as industrial uses and industrially zoned land were identified as needing
revision. He pointed out that the nature of industrial uses and industrial zoned
land is undergoing change, and high intensity uses are evolving into those that
produce fewer, less significant impacts.
Indicating that that these types of changes are anticipated in the Comprehensive
Plan land use designated areas known as Employment Area -Transition,
Employment Area -Industrial, and Employment Area -Valley, Mr. Pietsch
reviewed the location of and the uses allowed in each area. He reported that
there is a national trend away from traditional industrial uses, noting that new
l�
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 19
technology and science -based companies are different than traditional heavy
industry. Employees require more services and amenities, and traditional
industrial expansion could harm the City's ability to recruit growth industries.
Continuing, Mr. Pietsch explained that the GMA mandates that cities
accommodate a prescribed portion of future population growth, and Renton's
policies direct the largest proportion of this growth to the City's Urban Center.
He pointed out that the current Employment Area -Industrial and heavy
industrial zones do not allow residential uses. Mr. Pietsch said that Renton's
Urban Center meets Countywide Planning Policy criteria, and is expected to
provide the largest amount of housing to meet Renton's share of projected
growth.
Mr. Pietsch reported that development under current zoning could undermine
the City's potential for economic growth and the City's vision for the future.
Pointing out that new industrial development could have significant negative
impacts on the City's goals and vision, he stated that approximately six months
is needed to complete the required analysis, public hearing process, planning,
policy formulation, and Council action. He affirmed that Renton will continue
to work with individual property owners to find solutions, and continue -to -meet
with Boeing to discuss vision and future land use changes.
Mr. Pietsch indicated that as a result of discussions with Boeing, the addition of
clarifying language to the moratorium resolution concerning airplane
manufacturing is recommended. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington
stressed that the added language applies to improvements that take place within
existing buildings, and is not an exception to the requirements under the
moratorium.
In conclusion, Mr. Pietsch asked that Council support the six-month
moratorium on development beyond SEPA thresholds in the IH zones, and
adopt an amended moratorium resolution containing the revised language.
In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's question regarding the
added resolution language, City Attorney Larry Warren stated that the language
mirrors the intent of the development agreement the City currently has with
Boeing. He explained that the City does not intend to curtail uses on existing
structures; however, the City is concerned about the future use of properties
that are being surplused.
Public comment was invited.
L.P. Hughes, 8865 Overlake Dr. W., Medina, 98039, stated that he operates
Renton Concrete Recyclers which consists of 20 acres located on the Merlino
quarry property. Although the company has no plans to expand its operation at
this time, he requested clarification as to what is meant by SEPA review. Mr.
Hughes also expressed his disagreement that there is a national trend to do
away with traditional industrial uses, saying that it is a Puget Sound area
government trend.
City Attorney Warren explained that SEPA requires the permitting authority
(City of Renton), to review the environmental consequences of a proposed
project. If the project is large enough to trigger this environmental review, it is
subject to the moratorium. Pointing out that current operations are exempt, Mr.
Covington stated that it only applies to those operations that are changed or
expanded by an amount large enough to trigger this review.
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 20 f
Larry Dravis, Allpak Container, 3411 N. 7th St., Tacoma, 98046, stated that
SEPA review is required for Allpak's plans to expand its building to house an
expensive new piece of equipment. He stressed that the moratorium will be
detrimental to those plans, as the equipment has already been purchased. Mr.
Dravis indicated that although City staff is working with Allpak on the matter,
he was disappointed that there was no advance notice that a moratorium was to
be enacted.
Mayor Tanner stated that while the moratorium prohibits the City from granting
permits, it does not stop the submittal or review of those permits. He assured
Mr. Dravis that the City will continue to work with the company, and also
strive to eliminate the moratorium prior to the six-month period.
In response to Councilman Corman comments, Mayor Tanner affirmed that the
moratorium can be adjusted as progress is made on the various areas within the
IH zone.
Wayne Millage, Allpak Container General Manager, 26650 SE 15th St.,
Sammamish, 98075, stated that he understands the importance of planning and
realizes it is not the City's intention to hurt businesses; however, he emphasized
that timing is very important now that Allpak has purchased the equipment
needed for its expansion. Mr. Millage detailed why timing is so important for
the implementation of the equipment, and expressed his concern regarding the
economic impact of the moratorium on those plans.
Dan Lewis, 777 106th Ave. NE, Bellevue, 98004, speaking on behalf of
PACCAR, stated that the company currently has a 96-acre campus in Renton.
He described the business operations at the Renton plant, and reported that
PACCAR is planning a construction project at the site that requires SEPA
review. Mr. Lewis emphasized that PACCAR requires a predictable business
climate in which to do its business, requires land use that supports its continued
operation, and wants to remain in Renton for a long time to come.
Shaunta R. Hyde, Boeing Local Government Relations Manager, PO Box 3707,
Mail Code 14-49, Seattle, 98124, urged Council to support the amendment to
the moratorium resolution which will ensure that Boeing's consolidation efforts
and on -going operations will be protected. Although Boeing is disappointed
that the moratorium was enacted, she encouraged the City to use the time to
productively work with Boeing to resolve the surplus property issues.
David Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., #1900, Bellevue, 98004, spoke on behalf of
his clients Gary Merlino and Don Merlino whose companies own substantial
industrial holdings in Renton. He reported that one such holding contains a
number of warehouse -type buildings, and many are currently vacant due to the
decline in the economy. Mr. Halinen expressed concern that the moratorium
may impact the ability of his clients to procure tenants, if the tenants are unable
to expand the buildings beyond the SEPA threshold limit. He encouraged
Council to consider modifying the moratorium by limiting it to the Employment
Area -Transition area.
Matt Goetz, 356 Garden Ave. N., Renton, 98055, pointed out that citizens also
reside in areas impacted by the moratorium, and asked the City to keep that in
mind during its review of the matter.
3 January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 21
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY PARKER,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED. (See page 25 for resolution.)
Councilman Clawson requested that the Planning and Development Committee
be briefed -on the status of the moratorium at its meeting on Thursday, January
16th. He acknowledged the urgency of the situation, and stated that the City
will work as quickly as possible to -resolve the matter. Mr. Warren noted that
City staff has had contact with every one of the organizations that have
expressed their concerns this evening.
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL
REFER THE MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT IN THE HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL ZONE TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted
included:
• Mayor Tanner will discuss Renton's accomplishments and future outlook in
his 2003 State of the City address during a Renton Chamber of Commerce
luncheon on Wednesday, January 22nd. Following the luncheon, the
presentation will be available on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us
and will be featured on the City's cable channel 21 in early February.
• The Recreation Division has received a grant of $3,000 from the King
County Performing Arts Network for performances at Carco Theatre for the
2003 season.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 6, 2003. Council concur.
January 6, 2003
Board/Commission: Renton
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Lodging Tax Advisory
requested approval for the following members to serve on the Renton Lodging
Committee Membership
Tax Advisory Committee: Rick Meinig, Silver Cloud Inn General Manager;
Terry Godat, Travelers Inn General Manager (nominated to fill the position
vacated by Holiday Inn Select General Manager, Howard Cohen); Suzette
Cooke, Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce President; Julie Brewer, City of
Renton Community Relations Manager; and King Parker, City of Renton
Councilmember. Council concur.
EDNSP: Hotel/Motel Tax Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Revenue Allocation to Renton recommended approval of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
Lodging Association, Chamber recommendation to allocate $80,000 of hotel/motel tax revenues to the Renton
of Commerce Contract Lodging Association for its 2003 tourism marketing efforts. Authorization was
also sought to execute a contract with the Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce for year four of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism
promotional effort. Refer to Finance Committee.
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 22
EDNSP: Hotel/Motel Tax Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Revenue Allocation to
recommended approval of a contract with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing
Community Stakeholders &
Partnership for year five of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign.
Barbecue & Blues Festival,
Approval was also sought to allocate hotel/motel tax revenues in the amount of
Hamilton/Saunderson Contract
$20,000 to the key community stakeholders partnership for a fourth year of the
marketing campaign; and $30,000 for the proposed Renton Barbecue & Blues
Festival to be held in downtown Renton in September, 2003. Refer to Finance
Committee.
Annexation: Falk, S 47th St &
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
102nd Ave SE
recommended a public hearing be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution
calling for an annexation election, and the proposed prezoning of R-8 for the
proposed Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S. 47th St. to the north, SE
185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Council concur.
Annexation: Vuong, Anacortes
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Ave NE & NE loth St
recommended a public hearing be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution
calling for an annexation election, and the proposed .prezoning of R-8 for the
proposed Vuong Annexation; 2.7 acres located east of Anacortes Ave. NE and
north of NE loth St. Council concur.
Finance: Finance Analyst II
Finance and Information Services Department requested authorization to fill the
Hire at Step D
Finance Analyst 11 position at Step D of the salary range effective 1/1/2003.
Refer to Finance Committee.
Human Services: Joint Human
Human Services Division recommended approval of an agreement with South
Services Funding Program,
King County cities for the planning, funding, and implementation of a joint
South King County Cities
human services application and funding program. The City's cost share is
$67,300. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS
At the request of Council President Keolker-Wheeler, Planning/Building/Public
Public Works: Seattle Public
Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman gave a briefing on the Seattle Public
Utilities Pipeline ROW,
Utilities {SPU) pipeline right-of-way located on Renton Hill. Mr. Zimmerman
Renton Hill
reported that discussions with SPU regarding emergency access to the new
Heritage Hills plat brought to light the fact that the agreement allowing Renton
to use the SPU right-of-way between the Rolling Hills and Renton Hill
communities expired in 1981; however, operations continued as if the
agreement was still valid. He explained that the right-of-way is used by the
public to access Philip Arnold Park and for emergency vehicle and school bus
access to abutting neighborhoods.
Reporting that the City is in communication with both SPU and the Renton
School District regarding provisions for the new agreement with SPU, Mr.
Zimmerman indicated that SPU wants the users of the right-of-way to provide,
at their cost, litter control and pavement maintenance. He noted that the
Community Services Department unlocks and locks the Rolling Hills gate every
day, and earlier agreement negotiations proposed keeping the gate locked and
providing bus drivers with keys to the gate.
Mr. Zimmerman relayed that residents raised concerns. regarding keeping the
gate locked, and staff is now proposing to leave the gate procedure at its current
status. He added that the Renton School District has volunteered to share
responsibility with the City for.picking up litter and providing pavement
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 23
maintenance. In conclusion, Mr. Zimmerman reported that the three concerned
agencies are close to reaching an agreement on the matter.
At the request of Ms. Keolker-Wheeler, Community Services Administrator
Jim Shepherd reported that an estimated 11,481 people visited Philip Arnold
Park in 2002.
Ms. Keolker-Wheeler inquired as to whether the Falcon Ridge and Heritage
Hills Homeowners Associations should contribute to the maintenance of the
right-of-way since it is the secondary access point for both developments. Mr.
Zimmerman explained that the maintenance costs are not high due to the low -
quality pavement on the right-of-way, and staff has not addressed the issue of
homeowner association maintenance contributions because the costs are
marginal.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL
REFER THE SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
AGREEMENT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
Development Services: Fence MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER THE
Height Regulations CITY ATTORNEY CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE FENCE
HEIGHT REGULATIONS ORDINANCE TO THE PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Committee regarding the downtown core off-street parking requirements. The Committee
Planning: Downtown Core recommended that Council set a public hearing on January 27, 2003, for
Off -Street Parking consideration of this item. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
Requirements KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of
Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 211362 - 211611 and two wire transfers totaling
$1,932,761.66; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 42209 - 42341 totaling
$192,510.01. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Human Resources: Property & Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report on the review of property
Liability Claims Review and liability claims. This purpose of the review was to determine how and
when the Finance Committee wishes to review property and liability claims
activity. As a result of the discussion, the Finance Committee recommended
that staff transmit certain semi-annual claims activity reports from the
Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) to the Committee. Staff will
provide a detailed expense report with supporting information periodically with
WCIA billings. Staff will coordinate a meeting and/or presentation regarding
WCIA claims procedures at the Finance Committee's request. MOVED BY
PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Human Services: CDBG Finance Committee Chair Parker :presented a report recommending approval to
Specialist Hire at Step E fill the Community Development Block Grant Specialist position, in the Human
Services Division, at Grade 18, Step E. This would be retroactive to December
3, 2002. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL.
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Councilman Parker noted that this position was .previously a limited term
position at the same Step E level.
January 13, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 24
Human Resources: Healthcare Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the modifications
Plan Modifications to the City's healthcare benefits. The Committee recommended concurrence in
the recommendation of staff to adopt changes to the existing self -insured health
plan for firefighters, American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees (AFSCME) members, and all non -represented employees as
endorsed by the Health Benefits Task Force and as negotiated through the
collective bargaining process. The nature of these changes are either
mandatory or clarify coverage, and are recapped as follows:
1. Changes to Section 2, Schedule of Benefits:
a. The discretionary change involves increasing current $5 Preferred
Provider, and $15 Out -of -Network co -pays, to $25. The maximum
number of co -pays is ten per person, totaling $250 per year, or twenty-
five co -pays per family, totaling $625 per year.
b. Emergency room, MRI, and sterilization co -pays are increased to $1,00
and are not included in the $250 maximum.
c. Co -pays of $25 have been added for surgeon's fees, second surgical
opinion and chemical dependency.
d. Adult preventive care co -pay has decreased from $50 to $25 for charges
over $175 for Preferred Provider only.
e. The retail prescription benefits change from $8 and $3 co -pays to a
three -tiered plan. The co -pays for the three -tiered plan are $10 generic;
$20 preferred; and $40 non -preferred. Walgreens Health -Care Plus
(formerly Certifax) mail order prescriptions for a 90-day supply are $1'0
generic; $20 preferred; and $40 non -preferred. Prescription co -pays do
not apply to the medical co -pay maximums.
2. Changes to Section 13, General Provisions, subsection entitled Appealing a
Claim, include revised language regarding procedure and deadlines for
filing claims appeals, which is now broken down into the categories of first
level, second level, and subsequent action for all Post -Service, Pre -Service,
and Urgent Pre -Service Claims.
The Committee further recommended that the aforementioned changes to the
City's self -funded medical plan for employees as specified be effective as of
January 1, 2003. These changes will not require additional budget
appropriations.*
Councilman Parker noted that the healthcare plan changes are as outlined in the
firefighters and AFSCME labor contracts.
*MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiries, Human
Resources Administrator Mike Webby stated that the Health Benefits Task
Force met for a year prior to the collective bargaining process and concurred
with the recommended healthcare benefit changes. He confirmed that the co -
pay increase to $25 includes ,physical therapy and chiropractic visits.
Stating that the Health Benefits Task Force worked hard on this matter, Ms.
Keolker-Wheeler recommended that the City recognize the task force members
for their commitment.
It
January 13, 2003
Renton City Council Minutes Page 25
ORDINANCES AND
The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption.
RESOLUTIONS
Added
A resolution was read declaring a moratorium on development beyond State
Resolution #3613
Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) thresholds in the Heavy Industrial (111)
Planning: Heavy Industrial
Zone and establishing a termination date of July 13, 2003, for the moratorium.
Zone Development
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
Moratorium
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance #4999
Noting that he received a response from Assistant City Attorney Russ Wilson
Planning: Development
regarding his inquiry on whether Section 15 in the Development Regulations
Regulations (Title IV), Non-
amendment ordinance changes the appeal process in any way, Councilman
Substantive Amendments
Clawson explained that the provision concerns the recision of shoreline permits
that have failed to comply with the conditions placed on the permit and does
not change any appeal right or procedure.
An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4-2, Land Use Districts, Chapter 4-4,
Property Development Standards, Chapter 4-6, Street & Utility Standards,
Chapter 4-7, Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 4-8, Permits — General and
Appeals, Chapter 4-9, Permits — Specific, and Chapter 4-11, Definitions, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code to edit text references and
implement administrative determinations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED
BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #5000
An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-180 of Chapter 1, Administration
Utility: Utility Fee Code
and Enforcement, and Section 4-3-050.P of Chapter 3, Environmental
Amendments
Regulations and Special Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
City Code by reorganizing the sections to make them consistent with the Title
IV format and to be more user-friendly. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED
BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL RECESS
INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 13 MINUTES TO DISCUSS
LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 9:50 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:03 p.m.; roll was called; all
Councilmembers present.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 10:04 p.m.
BONNIE I. WALTON, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
January 13, 2003
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 13, 2003
COMMITTEEXHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
r
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
(Keolker-Wheeler)
COUNCIL WORKSHOP
CONRAUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE
(Parker)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Clawson)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Persson)
UTILITIES
(Corman)
MON., 01/20 No Meeting (Martin Luther King, Jr. Day)
MON., 01/27 South King County Cities Human Services
7:00 p.m. Funding Program Agreement;
Heavy Industrial Zone Moratorium (if
needed)
TUES., 01/21
2:00 to 6:00 p.m.
*Silver Cloud Inn,
Suite 106, 1850
Maple Valley
Hwy.*
Preparation for Two -Day Planning
Workshop with Staff
MON., 01/27 Vouchers;
5:30 p.m. Fill Finance Analyst lI Position at Step D;
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Funding
Recommendations for Renton Lodging
Association;
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Funding
Recommendations for Marketing Campaign
THURS., 01/16 Center Office Residential 3 Zone Code
2:00 p.m. Amendment;
Downtown Core Off -Street Parking
Requirements;
Heavy Industrial Zone Moratorium (briefing
only)
THURS., 01/16 S. Grady Way Westbound Concrete
3:30 p.m. Approach for Rainier Ave.
THURS., 01/16 Apollo Lift Station Transfer Agreement
3:00 p.m.
THURS., 01/23 Williams Request for Sewer Connection
4:00 p.m. Outside City Limits
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
DATE:
RECEIVE[
Id 0 9 2003
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS RENTONOTTYC®UNCt
MEMORANDUM
January 7, 2003
TO: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, City Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Judy Walter, Acting Recording Secretary
Board of Public Works
SUBJECT: W.S.D.O.T. Noise Variance Request
SR-167 Springbrook Creek Culvert Replacement
within the jurisdiction of the City of Renton
and City of Kent
The Washington State Department of Transportation has submitted a noise variance application
for consideration by the Board of Public Works. A copy of the application materials are attached
for your information and review.
The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 8:30 a.m. in the City of
Renton, Council Conference Room. Juliana Sitthidet, Board Coordinator, is the staff contact and
can be reached at extension 7304 if you have any questions.
cc: Juliana Sitthidet, Board Coordinator
Crystal McMeans, Recording Secretary
H:\File Sys\BPW - Board of Public Works\BPW-03 - Variance Applications\SR167 mayor-council.doc\jw
APPLICATION FOR
CITY OF RENTON
CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS E I: I V E U
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 DEC t
02
(425) 430-7204 ��
BUILDING D►VISION
OWNER Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 206440-4554
Telephone
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: State Route 167
Zip Code
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY include King County Assessors #: SR 167
(attach separate sheet of paper if necessary) rl x o264,
NAME OF PROJECT: SR167 Upper Sorinebrook Creek Culvert Replacement
APPLICANT: WSDOT (Maria Laura Musso Escude) 206-440-4554
Telephone
BUSINESS ADDRESS:: 15700 Dayton Ave. N. MS-138, Same as Above
P.O. Box 330310, Seattle, WA 98133-9710
Zip Code Telephone
Attach a separate letter stating in detail:
1. The request
2. Applicable City Code
3. Items and quantities involved
4. Justification for request
5. Time allotment required for request.
Attach a 1" = 100' drawing of your site and mail the completed application and map to:
CITY OF RENTON
Board of Public Works
Paul Lumbert, Coordinator
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
You will be contacted if application is incomplete or if additional information is required.
COMPLETED applications receive bS%�O l nday will be, placed on the agenda approximately 2 weeks
from that date. ����// / /r
Applicant's Signature
[Office Use Only] DATE OF FILING: 2— Zo_-oX?—
DATE OF HEARING: / -,RA —0.3
DEFERRAL ( ) New ( ) Extension
Offsite
Onsite
EXCESS R/W ( )
VARIANCE ( /� New
( ) UNDERGROUNDING
( ) SLOPE GRADES
( ) Extension
( ) DRIVEWAY
( ( NOISE
C:\variances\SR167XLI 125\Renton Application Form.doc\ FORM 81/0020 10/97
AIML
Washington State Northwest Region
Department of Transportation
Douglas B. MacDonald
Secretary of Transportation
December 10, 2002
Neil Watts
Board of Public Works Director
City of Renton
Administration - Fifth Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
SR167 Springbrook Creek Culvert replacement
XL 1125 SR 167 MP 23.64
Re: Noise Variance Application
Dear Mr. Watts:
The purpose of this letter is to submit an application for a noise variance to complete a WSDOT
project during nighttime. The project is located on SR 167 where the WSDOT contractor
representatives will replace the Springbrook Creek Culvert located within the jurisdiction of the
City of Renton and the City of Kent. The proposed ad date is January 13, 2003 to provide the
contractor enough procurement time for the precast culvert box to meet the requirement window
given on the hydraulic permit (HPA.) The project has a total of 20 working days with an
estimated start date of June 15 ending on September 30, 2003.
This project consists of replacing existing culvert and installing a 10' by 6' concrete box culvert,
excavating and backfilling, reconstructing asphalt concrete and median barrier and placing
pavement markings.
The culvert replacement will require a complete closure of SR167 for 3 nights during on
weekend in the month of August. Partial lane closures of SR167 will be required for 11 nights
to perform backfilling and roadway items of work as shown on the attachment.
The acoustic and air quality unit bases this request on reasons of public and work zone safety
with which the WSDOT traffic construction group concurs. Full closure of SR167 is required for
the correct placement of the culvert box; consequently a 24-hour work shift would be beneficial
to ensure timely completion of the box culvert. Minimizing the detour route will be beneficial
for the traveling public and city streets where the SR167 traffic will be detoured during one
weekend in August. Daytime work would require partial lane closures, which may result in
increase of accidents and reduction of labor safety due to the reduced work area, and traveled
The construction Project Engineer in charge of administering the contract and WSDOT contact
person is:
Ingo Goller, P.E.
21851 84`h Ave South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone: (253) 872-2958 Fax: (253) 872-2966
Please review this application and if the proposal is acceptable, let us know the hearing date so
we may develop the notifications as directed by the city. If you have any questions please contact
me at (206) 440-4554.
incere
Maria Laura Musso-Escude
Acoustic, Air Quality and Energy Specialist
Attachments
cc: Ingo Goller/Amjad Omar MS 59
SR 167 Springbrook Culvert Replacement XL1125
Day file
List of night construction equipment
4 Flatbed trucks (14 days)
1 jack hammer/saw cut (5 days)
2 Truck mounted Attenuators (14 days)
1 Air compressor (10 days)
I Plant with generator set for lights (14 nights)
1-ton pick up trucks (14 days)
Dump trucks (14 days)
Cranes ( 5 nights)
Pavement planers ( 4 nights)
Paving machine (12 nights or less)
Rollers ( 12 nights)
Boom truck ( 12 nights)
SR167 Roadway and Ramp closures
One weekend on August 2003, from Friday 11 P.M. to 5:00 A. M. on Monday
Ramp closure at the same time with provided de -tour routes:
S. 212`h St. on -ramp to northbound SR 167
SW 41" St on -ramp to southbound SR 167
SR 167 Lane Closures
Lane closures proposed for SR167 are listed as follows:
General purpose
Sunday to Thursday ( nightly) 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m.
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
JAN 13 2003
D .,Cff yCONCIL
DATE: January 13, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:�Tesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman
STAFF CONTACT: Gregg Zimmerman
SUBJECT: Seattle Public Utilities Right -of -Way, Renton Hill
Issue:
Discussions with Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) regarding emergency access to the new Heritage
Hills Plat brought to light the fact that the agreement allowing Renton to use the SPU pipeline
right-of-way between the Rolling Hills and the Renton Hill communities expired back in 1981.
According to Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), the City of Renton agreed in the expired agreement
1) to maintain the road, 2) to police the right-of-way and 3) to open the gate in the morning and
close the gate at night. For years access on the right-of-way was used by the public to access
Philip Arnold Park and for emergency vehicle and school bus access to abutting neighborhoods.
Construction vehicles were explicitly prohibited from using the right-of-way.
Staff has been in communication with both SPU and the Renton School District regarding
provisions of a new agreement with SPU. SPU wishes the users of the right-of-way to provide, at
their cost, litter control and pavement maintenance. The Renton School District wishes to
continue to have school buses drive up the paved roadway from the Rolling Hills neighborhood
and pick up the Renton Hills school children near Philip Arnold Park. The staffs of the City of
Renton, the Renton School District, and SPU have been discussing locking the Rolling Hills gate,
providing a key to the school bus drivers to allow them to continue using this route for picking up
children, and having the Renton School District share the responsibility with the City for picking
up litter and providing pavement maintenance. In order to address the concerns some residents
have raised about undesirable impacts that would be created by locking the Rolling Hills gate,
staff will be proposing to leave the gate in its current status (the Parks Department would
continue to open the gate in the morning and lock it at dusk).
Main Provisions of the Proposed SPU Draft Agreement:
1. City of Renton will continue to open the gate in the morning and lock the gate every evening
(PARKS)
2. SPU authorizes and the City of Renton agrees to provide law enforcement for the right-of-way
permit area. (POLICE)
Document2kor
Page 2.
3. SPU authorizes and the City of Renton agrees to clean-up debris and material dumped or
abandoned in the right-of-way permit area. (the School District would provide litter
collection).
4. The City of Renton agrees to maintain the roadway surface in order to keep it in a safe and
passable condition at all times, and to take such measures as may be necessary to abate dust
from traffic using the roadway (the School District would financially participate in roadway
surface maintenance).
A separate agreement is being drawn up between the City of Renton and the School District
describing these responsibilities and commitments.
cc: Jay Covington
Jim Shepherd
Leslie Betlach
Lys Hornsby
Dave Christensen
Karin McFarland
Document2\cor
7— 1 6-02 ; 2 = 40PM; Sao REAL PROP SVCS • LVJ {J • • -• ^
r' ,.v r+r jl1 .,`may vv✓ —��— �.
' i jYV cj(�3Y� ird1
�' •'� '`:: tea'" ,i EXHIBIT "All
y M
- ♦ ti � . fP i' •'i •/—"•vim' �i-'r � :`�� !!
•' v''',•r 4L— Z.t S�Ti�C�LtJ ��-1{.��X� � —.. _� I I _ � q; yJ .ss+1r� — �•y.
� • i 1 -� � E • .4 .•r
� '' � � '� �11+1:1 +O�j "s - _ �_ - �oP� � w� • . � • RAM
/. i A.r 2 •,+'r � - � 1PPA �tNE � � i "� Jr�;"i .•� �..
i' � d a!/ � r� �. ♦' / �� � ram' P �A�N ./ is�j � � � -
L
r � .:, a �: °°`.n... � �" • � � � ,—
SOW "Vol
COMPANY _ ^,. _
r•a• '♦-�-- ...—'&ROL 0N.taa •/,f.••. t.. i
• .— R YR 1 L. CQ / � 1001
/
tooNt
/
i
i 1 •a•
✓' ,+/ ` to
PERMIT AREA '
f
l� it .`Zti
_ _�.—.--.--.' T- �—s r s s.r �.wt tf.r--.--.—_.__ 'M .---_._— _---.—r.—� �•Gf -•ran O - ` - +
BON1EVlaL[ 7IiMb UNE ESML ` •ti •. Z a
s -
er
, _ f .
'' a �• „� e' � �,° -' '� '...+y � 4-
THE CITY OF SEATTLE - SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
PERMIT and AGREEMENT Y,ZY,0 1
SPU PERMIT #
This Permit and Agreement terminates and replaces SPU Permit#U71-008.
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between THE CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE PUBLIC
UTILITIES, (hereinafter "City'), and the CITY OF RENTON, (hereinafter "Permittee".):
The City does hereby grant, to the extent of its authority, for and in consideration of the mutual and
offsetting benefits contained herein, a non-exclusive permit to the Permittee:
to use the surface of the City of Seattle's 66' Cedar River Pipeline Right -of -Way (CRPL R/W) in
order to provide an access roadway to Phillip Arnold Park and emergency vehicle access to the
Falcon Ridge and :Renton. Heritage Hill developments, across the NE % and the NE % of the SE
% of Section 20, Township 23, Range 5 East, W.M-, King County, WA. As shown on Exhibits
"A" & "B", attached.
SUBJECT to City of Seattle ordinances and regulations and to the following terms:
SPECIAL TERMS:
1. Permittee will lock the right-of-way gates every evening.
2. The "emergency vehicle" access from the Renton Heritage Hill development shall be gated with a
locked gate similar to the existing gate at the Falcon Ridge Development. (a copy of the plans for
the gate are to submitted to Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) for review and approval)
3. A fee in the amount of $2,000-shall be paid to Seattle Public Utilities by the Renton Heritage Hill
developer for costs Jpcurred. by SPU, in connection the project to date. Further costs could be due
if additional work is .performed by`SPU in conjunction with the development
4. No construction vehicles shall be allowed on any portion of SPU's CRPL R/W, including the
development of the,Renton Heritage Hills Plat.
5. The City authorizes and the Permittee agrees to provide law enforcement for the right-of-way
permit area.
6. The City authorizes and the Permittee agrees to clean-up debris and material dumped or
abandoned in the right-of-way permit area.
GENERAL TERMS:
1. The City will at all times have unrestricted access to the permit area for the operation, maintenance
and repair of its water pipelines.
2. The Permittee's use of the City's'right of way shall in no way interfere with the City's present or future
use of said right of way for any purpose.
3. The City reserves the right to close the permit area to travel when necessary to its operational needs.
4. The use herein granted is for access road purposes only. This permit does not authorize the
installation of drainage or utilities.
5. No walls, rockeries, fences, poles, sidewalks, trees, or changes in grade of the surface of the right of
way, shall be installed, constructed or accomplished without permission in writing from Seattle Public
Utilities.
6. No vehicles or loads other than those permitted by the City of Renton on any and every street in the
City of Renton, shall be permitted on the permit area without written permission from Seattle Public
Utilities.
From:
David Christensen
To:
Zimmerman, Gregg
Date:
1/10/03 2:05PM
Subject:
SPU Right Of Way
Gregg,
Just a heads up that some misinformation has been sent out to the Renton Hills folks. As you may recall,
Tech Services has been negotiating with SPU to re-establish our agreement regarding that portion of
Beacon Avenue that currently serves as an emergency access for Falcon Ridge and will be used as an
emergency access for the new plat, Heritage Hills. It also has been used as an access to Phillip Arnold
Park by the Rolling Hills folks as well. Another use, not for the City, is Renton School District uses it as a
route for their school busses to pick-up kids from Renton Hill due to the tight restraints on accessing
Renton Hill itself.
Our proposal is to now have the gate closed at all times for City purposes, but to allow the school district
to have a lock on the gate that allows there busses to utilize the SPU ROW. As such, we are currently
putting together an agreement between the City and the School District that identifies responsibilities. As
we have this in place we will also work to final the agreement submitted by SPU.
The misinformation occurred as we had talks with the School District and evaluated the option of closing
the gates and not allowing the busses. Ruthie Larson somehow got a hold of this information and has
talked with folks and may bring this up at the next City Council meeting.
Bottom line, all parties, City of Renton, SPU, and Renton School District are on target to complete this
agreement soon, the busses will continue to use there existing routes, and the emergency access for
police and fire is still accessible.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Dave C.
CC: Betlach, Leslie; Hornsby, Lys; McFarland, Karen; Thompson, John
From:
Julia Medzegian
To:
Bonnie Walton
Date:
1 /13/03 12:03PM
Subject:
Fwd: SPU Right Of Way
FYI,
Jay forwarded to Councilmembers
'rom: Gregg Zimmerman
'o: Julia Medzegian
)ate: 1/10/03 2:18PM
subject: Fwd: SPU Right Of Way
Julia, I am forwarding this information on to you, as it may come up as a topic at a future City Council
meeting.
Gregg
RENTON SCHOOL OISTR
January 10, 2003
TO: The Parents on Renton Hill
Attending Dimmitt and Talbot Hill
FR: Debra Holmes `
Transportation Director
RE: Phillip Arnold Park access road
Renton School District 403 /cHOpc
Transportation Department o� °��
1220 North 4th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Z
(425) 204-4455 Fox (425) 204-4465 �d y
a.
www.renton.wednet.edu
RECEIVED
JAN 13 2003
R�CmCO�NCIL
The Renton School District is currently working with the City of Renton, on a plan
to share responsibility for keeping open and maintaining the roadway and right-of-
way along Beacon Way SE. We feel this is in the best interest of the students to
maintain access for the school buses, which transport students attending Dimmitt
Middle School and Talbot Hill Elementary.
We will have this completed in the near future, to ensure there is no disruption in
accessing the park and transportation services.
We will keep you informed as we work towards common good for the community.
Cc: Dr. Dolores Gibbons
Rick Stracke
Kathleen Bailey
Ed Sheppard
Dave Christensen, City of Renton
Post Office Box 626 - Renton, Washin ton 98057 - (425) 255-8678 / FAX (425) 255-5474 Lr l
AHE,&D OF THE .C�f,RVE:
This.papercontains 50%regyciedmaterial, 30%Post consumer
I
FINANCE COMMITTEE APPROVED BY
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE REPORT '
Date
January 13, 2003
MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S HEALTHCARE BENEFITS
Referred January 06, 2003
The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in Staffs recommendation to adopt changes to the existing
self_insured health plan for firefighters, American Federation of .State; County and Municipal Employees
(AFSCMt=) members and all non -represented employees, as endorsed by the Health Benefits Task Force and as
negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The nature of these changes are either mandatory or for the
purposes of clarification of coverage and are.recapped as follows:
1. Changes to Section 2, Schedule of Benefits:
a. The discretionary change involves increasing current $5 Preferred Provider, and $15 Out -of Network
co pays, to $25 The maximum number of co -pays is ten (10) per person, totaling $250 per year, or
twenty-five (26) co -pays per family, totaling $625. per year:
b. Emergency Room, MRI and Sterilization co pays are increased to $100 and are not included in ,the
$250 maximum.
�ka
�.`
c. Co -pays of $25 have be' en-added,for Surgeon's Fees;"Second Surgical Opinion and Chemical
Dependency.3 k3f
d. Adult preventive care co payhas decreased from $50tifo $25..for,, charges over $175 for Preferred
Provider Only
e.. The retail prescription benefitsJhang�forrr $8 and $3 co pays to a three -tiered plan. The co=pays,for
. the three=tiered plan are $10 generic 20 prefe`rred; an e $ O'not-preferred.. Walgreens Health -Care
Plus (formerly Certifax) mail ord,er�p�rescnptions fora 90-day supply are $10 generic; $20 preferred;
and $40 non -preferred (Prescription=,co-pays do, not apply to th medical co -pay maximums.)
':t "
2. Changes to Section 13, General Provisions, subsection en it I d APPEALING A CLAIM, include revised
a r a ,
language regarding procedure and deadlines for filing clairm appeals, which is now broken down into the
categories of first level, secondievel`and,subsequent�action for all Post -Service, Pre -Service and Urgerit
Pre -Service Claims.16
w
The mmittee er recommends that the aforementioned changes to ,the City's self -funded medical plan for
.e_ plo_yee ecifie be effectiv of January 1, 2003. These changes will not:require additional budget
a pro is " ns.
King Parker, Chair
cc:- Jay6avift Michael Webby
CITY OF RENTON, WAS HINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3W3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT BEYOND STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (SEPA) THRESHOLDS IN THE
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (IH) ZONE AND ESTABLISHING A
TERMINATION DATE FOR THE MORATORIUM.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton has substantial acreage that is currently zoned Heavy
Industrial (IH); and
WHEREAS, the regional trend has been away from heavy industrial users to other types
of use; and
WHEREAS, in order to meet the demand for other than heavy industrial users, the City
will need to review its Comprehensive Plan for the Comprehensive Plan designations of Employee
Area Valley, Employee Area Industrial, and Employee Area Transition and its IH zone; and
WHEREAS, development or redevelopment of properties within the IH zone may result
in potentially significant traffic impacts on regional roads at a time when the electorate has
significantly reduced the amount of available money for transportation improvements; and
WHEREAS, certain areas within the IH zone have had a temporary Comprehensive Plan
designation which is to be reviewed at the next review of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, approval and construction of additional development and redevelopment
projects within the IH zone, without review of the Comprehensive Plan policies, may undermine
the benefits of coordinated planning, and may foreclose or irreparably damage long-term
Comprehensive Plan goals; and
WHEREAS, this moratorium will be implemented to provide adequate time for City staff
to prepare and present proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning and present such
changes to the City Council for review and adoption;
RESOLUTION NO.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. There is hereby declared a moratorium on development beyond
State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) thresholds in the Heavy Industrial (III) Zone in order
to provide adequate time for the staff to draft, review, and present to the City Council, and for the
City Council to review and adopt changes to the Comprehensive Plan policies underlying the
Heavy Industrial (IH) zone and to the permitted uses under that zone; provided, that this
moratorium does not apply to the construction, modification or operation of any airplane
manufacturing facility (or supporting uses) located in the IH zone.
SECTION III. This moratorium shall be in place for a period not to exceed six
months, which period may be extended or renewed for one or more additional periods, but only if
a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.956:1/10/03:ma
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2003.
2 1
CITY OF" RENTON
tWt Office of the City Attorney
JesseTannec,Mayor Lawrence'J.Warren
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January' 8, 2003
TO: Renton City Councilmembers .
FROM: • Russell Wilson,. Assisiant City Attorney
RE:.: Ordinance -regard ung'appeal process
During the City Council meeting of January 6, 2003;•Councilmem. r Claws<sn raised a
question portainin to the ordinance which amended several'.sections of Title IV .o of the: City
Co cilmember Clawson : ted to ow what a of rescinded'
Code, S icali tm lcn t
Pe .. Y, yP .
r
m ea e
e ended section d , -if t ie ndinent .was c' � th al
licati ns t am c h a o t and.
PP �. .fig g
PP .�
process in any way. _h Y
The -section in question can be�uiid on page... zc ion "-of the .ordiriaiice, which.
}
-amends 4=917190.N:5. •.After v ewui `tb cyrrent code andv.Smp"g it with the amended
section I can now. answer CQuncilmmbeir1sfiy�gistton The's cton fva
deals with the
�, s r .
rescission oforeline:peninits that 1yle•' el, i�Ilt,gam,l withhe�con itions plaeed.on the
ermit:: The spec, ific amendment`ta; - es t of Chang e t ie f y a peal right or
p.�., i a��..� P
w.
read' -
procedure. The amended section isdentialxoept't�it adds one Iat sentence that reads: '
"For conditional use or vanat ces,) partment'°of Eco Qy his 0,c�ay . to make fnal decision
followed by a.2.1-day appeal,e INK
..•' q
I hope this answers the q esf ion jCou i ilman + lawst�r1ther
�'raisedlo the Caiiucil's
<. .
satisfaction; If not,.please contact nO*nd I`w 1prov dt any% information or clarification :. -
you require: s..,
Russell Wilson
W:ma
cc: Jay Covington: .
Post Office Box 626 -Renton, Washington 98057-.(425) 255-8678 / FAX (425) 255-5474 - R t. N T •O N
AHEAD F
iw. paper s Oontaf�50% regyded material, 36% pest Consumer
'OTHE C;UAYE'
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4-2, LAND USE DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 4-4,
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-6, STREET &
UTILITY STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS,
CHAPTER 4-8, PERMITS — GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 4-9,
PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 4-11, DEFINITIONS; OF TITLE
IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO EDIT TEXT REFERENCES AND
IMPLEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONS.
THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASIIINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Sections 4-2-070.A through R of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts,"
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, attached.
SECTION H. Section 4-2-110.13 of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit B, attached.
SECTION III.
Section 4-2-110.G of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit C, attached.
SECTION IV. Section 4-4-010.1) of Chapter 4, "City-wide Property Development
Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.
D. EXEMPTIONS: Household pets as defined in RMC 4-11-160 are a permitted use
in all zones in the City and as such are not regulated by this Section provided they number three
(3) or less.
SECTION V. A new subsection, 4-4-080.B. l .b.i, of Chapter 4, "City-wide
Property Development Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No.
4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby added,
to read as follows:
i. Exemption: Change of use within a Shopping Center shall not be required to
increase parking capacity.
SECTION VI. Section 4-4-080.F.7.c.iii of Chapter 4, "City-wide Property
Development Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled
"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as
follows:
iii. Screening of Adjacent and/or Abutting. Residential Uses Required: A planting
area or berm with landscaping shall be provided on those sides of a parking lot that are adjacent
to or abutting properties used and/or zoned for residential purposes. (See specific zoning
classification.) Such planting shall be subject to the requirements of the zoning development
standards and shall be of a sufficient height to serve as a buffer.
SECTION VII. Section 4-6-040.F.4 of Chapter 6, "Street and Utility Standards,"
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby deleted.
SECTION VIII. Section 4-6-040.G of Chapter 6, "Street and Utility Standards," of
title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new section, 4-6-
040.G.13, to read as follows:
13. Use of Old Sewers: Old building sewers may be used in connection with new
buildings only when they are found, on examination and tests by the Utilities Engineer, to meet
all requirements of this Chapter.
SECTION IX. Section 4-7-170.F.1 of Chapter 7, "Subdivision Regulations," of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Minimum Lot Size and Pipestem Width and Length: The pipestem shall not
exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in length and not be less than twenty feet (20') in width.
The portion of the lot narrower than eighty percent (80%) of the minimum permitted width shall
not be used for lot area calculations nor for measurement of required front yard setbacks.
SECTION X. Section 4-7-170.F.2. of Chapter 7, "Subdivision Regulations," of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Shared Access Requirements: Abutting pipestem lots shall have a shared private
access driveway. A restrictive covenant will be required on both parcels for maintenance of the
pipestem driveway.
SECTION XI.
Section 4-8-110.H.2 of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and
Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Place and Time for Filing Appeals: Appeals of decisions by the Land Use Hearing
Examiner must be made directly to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appeals are made by filing a
3
ORDINANCE NO.
request for the same within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the final order and by concurrently
filing copies of such request with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office
as provided in section 18(1) of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971.
SECTION XII.
Subsection 4-8-120.D.19.k for "Site Plan, Land Use Review, Level
I" of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as follows:
k. Footprint of all proposed buildings showing the location of building entrances,
window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay District
review packet only).
SECTION XIII. A new subsection 4-8-120.D.19.1 for "Site Plan, Land Use Review,
Level I" of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations)
of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby added, to read as follows, with the remaining subsection renumbered
accordingly as subsection 4-8-120.D.19.m.
1. Footprint of all abutting and adjacent buildings showing the location of building
entrances, window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay
District review packet only).
SECTION XIV. Section 4-9-070.B.1 of Chapter 9, "Permits — Specific," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Exemptions: See WAC 197-11-800.
4
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XV. Section 4-9-190.N.5 of Chapter 9, "Permits — Specific," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
5. Final Decision or Recommendation: The decision of the Land Use Hearing
Examiner shall be the final decision of the City on all rescinded applications. A written decision
shall be transmitted to the Department of Ecology, the Attorney General's office, the applicant,
and such other departments or boards of the City as are affected thereby and the legislative body
of the City. For conditional use or variances, Department of Ecology has 30 days to make final
decision followed by a 21-day appeal period.
SECTION XVI. Section 4-11-040, "Dwelling Unit, Attached," of Chapter 11,
"Definitions," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
DWELLING UNIT, ATTACHED: See DWELLING, MULTI -FAMILY.
SECTION XVII.
Section 4-11-250, "Yard Requirement," of Chapter 11,
"Definitions," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
YARD REQUIREMENT: An open space on a lot unoccupied by structures, unless
specifically authorized otherwise. The required yard depth is measured perpendicularly from a
lot line to the outer wall of the structure. In the case where a structure does not have an outer
wall, such as a carport, the measurement shall be to the posts of such structure, unless otherwise
determined by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division shall
determine the various requirements for uniquely shaped lots and pipestem lots.
5
ORDINANCE NO.
A. Front Yard: The yard requirement which separates the structure(s) from public
right-of-way. For through lots, corner lots, and lots without street frontage, the front yard will be
determined by the Development Services Division Director.
B. Side Yard Along A Street: The yard requirement which is neither a front yard nor
a rear yard, yet it abuts a street right-of-way.
C. Rear Yard: The yard requirement opposite the front yard. Where a lot abuts an
alley, the rear yard shall always be the yard abutting the alley. For irregularly shaped lots, the
rear yard shall be measured from an imaginary line at least fifteen feet (15') in length located
entirely within the lot and farthest removed and parallel to the front lot line or its tangent.
D. Side Yard: The yard requirement which is not a front yard, a side yard along a
street, or a rear yard.
SECTION XVI11. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and.
30 days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1024:12/ 11 /02: ma
day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
0
ATTACHMENT "A"
4-2-070A RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Agriculture
P
Natural resource extraction/recovery
H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
are animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
flowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels
AD #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
Stables, commercial
AD #37
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling P #19
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Accessory dwelling unit
AD #7
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
P
Rome occupations
AC #6
etirement residences
H
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Veterinary offices/clinics P
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses (new)
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
ealthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070A RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC)
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
I H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Pemutted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
2
4-2-070B RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (R-1)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Agriculture
P
Natural resource extraction/recovery
H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
Stables, commercial
AD #37
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
H
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
I P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses(existing)
P
Golf courses new
P
Marinas
P
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070B RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (R-1)
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Pemutted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070C RESIDENTIAL-5 MAC (R-5)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
dwelling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes 11 for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses existing
P
Golf courses new
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
NVIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
5
4-2-070C RESIDENTIAL-5 DU/AC (R-5)
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
0
tt
,,� 4-2-070D RESIDENTIAL-8 (R-8)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
are animal per acre
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building existin legal)
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
H
Recreation
Golf courses(existing)
P
Golf courses new
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accesso AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
7
4-2-070D RESIDENTIAL-8 (R-8)
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
as defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070E RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOMES (RMH)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes
P #10
Manufactured homes, designated
P #19
Mobile homes
P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Caretaker's residence
AC
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices AD
City government facilities
= H
Other government offices & facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses new
H
SERVICES
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
9
4-2-070E RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOMES (RMH)
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Pemritted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
I[7
4-2-07OF RESIDENTIAL-10 (R-10)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
Mowed above
H #36
Kennels, hobb
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Semi -attached dwelling
P #19
Attached dwelling
P #50
Flats or townhouses(existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal),
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes H for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
AD
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
I P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
tilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-07OF RESIDENTIAL-10 (R-10)
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
therwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
12
4-2-07OG RESIDENTIAL-14 (R-14)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Semi -attached dwelling
P #19
Attached dwelling
P #50
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS,
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
H #33
Horticultural nurseries
I
H
Retail sales
H #33
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
H
Recreation
Recreational facilities, indoor
P #33
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #33
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
On -site services
H #33
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H #33
Day care centers
H #33
Family day care
AC
ealthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
13
4-2-07OG RESIDENTIAL-14 (R-14)
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
P #53
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
P #10
sed for construction
�emporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
14
4-2-070H RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY (RM)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses(existing legal
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building existing legal
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Congregate residence
AD
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
P #42
Offices, general
P #42
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #42
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #42
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
AD
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD #5
Off -site services
P #42
On -site services
P #42
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
STORAGE
Self-service storage P #8
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
tilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
15
4-2-070H RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY (RM)
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole H support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
16
4-2-0701 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL (CC)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #18
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Home occupations AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Offices, general AD #17
TAIL
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eatingand drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #60
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities AD
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
On -site services
P #63
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care II
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Car washes
AD #2
Vehicle fueling stations
AD
Vehicle service and repair, small
AD #2
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC #11
INDUSTRIAL
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
17
4-2-0701 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL (CC)
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole R support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
IV
4-2-070J CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD (CN)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #20
Semi -attached dwelling
P #20
Attached dwelling
P #20
Flats or townhouses(existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing le al
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P #20
Congregate residence
P #20
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #20
Group homes II for 7 or more
P #20
Rome occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #20
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #22
ARKS
Parks ; neighborhood
P
Parks:-regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
,Community Facilities
�Cemetery H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social or anizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
AD #22
Offices, general
P #22
Veterinary offices/clinics
AD #22
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #68
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor P #22
SERVICES
Services, General
On -site services
P #69
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Vehicle rental, small
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care II
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #22
Medical institutions
H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
19
4-2-070J CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD (CN)
Car washes
P #22
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
AD #22
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
AD
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC # 11
Self-service storage
H #26
INDUSTRIAL
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Pemvtted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
20
4-2-070K CENTER SUBURBAN (CS)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #20
Semi -attached dwelling
P #20
Attached dwelling
P #20
Flats or townhouses(existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P #20
Congregate residence
P #20
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #20
Group homes H for 7 or more
P #20
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #20
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
_P #22
ARKS
Parks; neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
lCommunity Facilities
emetery H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
P #22
Offices, general
P #22
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #22
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #22
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
AD #22
Dance halls
AD #22
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor 7EPM
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #22
Motel
P #22
On -site services
P #22
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care II
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers P #22
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
21
4-2-070K CENTER SUBURBAN (CS)
Medical institutions H
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Car washes
P #22
Express transportation services
AD #22
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P #22
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC # 11
Outdoor storage
AD #64
Self-service storage
H #26
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing AD #22
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
ommunications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
sed for construction
P #10
emporary uses
I P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
22
4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA)
USES:
TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Attached dwelling P #18
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Group homes I
H
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
Trade or vocational school
H
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #38
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P
Retail sales, outdoor
P
Taverns
P
Vehicle sales, large
P #41
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P
Dance halls
P
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H
Movie theaters
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
AD
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P
Recreational facilities, outdoor
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P
Motel
P
Off -site services
P #38
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Pemvtted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
23
4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA)
On -site services
P
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Vehicle rental, small
P
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P
Day care centers
P
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
H #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
AD
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P
Transit centers
H
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use
H
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC #11
Outdoor storage
P #64
Self-service storage
H
Vehicle storage
AD #38
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole H support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
rremporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
24
4-2-070M CENTER DOWNTOWN (CD)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #16
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Adult familyhome
P #3
Congregate residence
P #3
Group homes I
H #3
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #3
Group homes II for 7 or more
H #3
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #3
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC #28
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
H
Dance halls
H
Movie theaters
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor P
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
P
Bed and breakfast house, professional
P
Hotel
P
On -site services
P
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #70
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P
Day care centers
P
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
25
4-2-070M CENTER DOWNTOWN (CD)
Family day care AC #3
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #3
Medical institutions
H
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P #3
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #3
Taxi stand
AD
Transit centers
P
Air Transportation Uses
Municipal airports H
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC #11
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Commercial laundries, existing
P #4
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #3
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
AD #3
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H #3
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
26
4-2-07ON COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES -
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Retirement residences P #39
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/cominunity, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
CommunityFacilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H #12
Public Facilities
City government offices
P
City government facilities
H
Jails, existing municipal
P
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Eating and drinking establishments
P #12
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #54
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #12
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #65
Recreational facilities, outdoor
H #38
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
On -site services
P #54
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #61
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P #12
Day care centers
P
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #39
Medical institutions
P #40
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
AD
Taxi stand
AD
Transit centers
H #38
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
27
4-2-07ON COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO)
Vehicle fueling stations P #38
Air Transportation Uses
elf ads, accessory to primary use H
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC #11
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing
AD #54
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
AD
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H #38
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Pemritted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
RM
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
USES: TYPE:
GRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
dwelling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Attached dwelling P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
AD
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #21
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organization-
H #21
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #21
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #27
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #21
Taverns
P #21
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
H
Dance halls
H
Recreation
Golf courses(existing)
P
Golf courses new
H
Marinas
P #21
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #21
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P
On -site services
P #21
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #61
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P #21
Day care centers
P #21
Family day care
AC
ealtlicare Services
Convalescent centers
AD
Medical institutions
H
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
29
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC # 11
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
H
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #23
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
sed for construction
P #10
em orary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
30
4-2-070P INDUSTRIAL LIGHT (IL)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
Trade or vocational school
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
onference Center P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #38
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large
P #38
Day Care Services
Adult day care I P #55
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
31
4-2-070P INDUSTRIAL LIGHT (IL)
Adult day care II
AD
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H #56
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
AD
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Transit centers
H #38
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
AD
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use H
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
offsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P #58
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
ndustrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P #14
aboratories: light manufacturing
P #38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P #31
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Solid Waste/Re cliit
Recycling collection station and
processina center
P #14
Recycling collection station
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #38
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
icr
facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
�Ternporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC.4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
32
4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H #59
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
OME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #38
Trade or vocational school
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD x
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #29
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #38
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large
P #29
Day Care Services
Adult day care I P #55
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
33
4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM)
ZW
Adult day care H
AD
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H #56
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
P
Fuel dealers
H #59
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Tow truck operation/auto
impoundment yard
H #59
Transit centers
H #38
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Wrecking yard, auto
H #59
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use
H #38
eli ads, commercial
H
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
ffsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P #59
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P
Laboratories: light manufacturingP
#38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
H #59
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #67
Solid Waste-lRecycling
Recycling collection station and
rocessin center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
Sewage disposal and treatment plants
H #59
Waste recycling and transfer facilities
H #59
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #29
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
irel ss communication facilities
P #49
Monoole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
se d for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
34
4-2-07OR INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH)
TYPES:
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #38
Trade or vocational school
H
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
i -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #38
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large
P #29
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #55
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions f H #56
Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C, Aquifer Protection
Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program
Requirements.
35
4-2-07OR INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH)
r-
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Fuel dealers
P
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Railroad yards
P
Tow truck operation/auto
impoundment yard
P
Transit centers
H #38
Truck terminals
P
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Wrecking yard, auto
H
Air Transportation Uses
Airplane sales and repair
P
eli ads, accessory to pri a use
H #38
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
offsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
P #67
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #67
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
rocessing center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
Sewage disposal and treatment plants
H
Waste recycling and transfer facilities
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #38
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
ino modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
I P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
[Femporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
36
ATTACHMENT "B"
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached Accessory Structures)5
e
R
4-2-110W
RC R-1 R-5 R-8
MAXIMUM NUMBER AND SIZE
General
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures, — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
per structure,
per structure,
per structure,
per structure,
Or
Or
Or
Or
1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure - max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure - max. 1,000 sq. ft.
In addition, 1 barn or stable —
In addition, 1 barn or stable —
Accessory structures shall only
Accessory structures shall only
ax. 2,000 sq. ft.; provided the
max. 2,000 sq. ft.; provided the
be allowed on lots in
be allowed on lots in
of is 5 acres or more.
lot is 5 acres or more.
conjunction with a primary
conjunction with a primary
residential use.
residential use.
ccessory structures shall only
6,ccessory structures shall only
e allowed on lots in
a allowed on lots in
onjunction with a primary
onjunction with a primary
esidential use.
residential use.
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA
General
The total floor area of all
The total floor area of all
The total floor area of all
he total floor area of all
accessory buildings shall not be
accessory buildings shall not be
accessory buildings shall not be
ccessory buildings shall not be
greater than the floor area of the
greater than the floor area of the
greater than the floor area of the
reater than the floor area of the
primary residential use. The lot
primary residential use. The lot
primary residential use. The lot
rimary residential uses. The lot
overage of the primary
coverage of the primary
coverage of the primary
overage of the primary
esidential structure along with
residential structure along with
residential structure along with
esidential structure along with
II accessory buildings shall not
all accessory buildings shall not
all accessory buildings shall not
II accessory buildings shall not
xceed the maximum lot
exceed the maximum lot
exceed the maximum lot
xceed the maximum lot
overage of this Zoning District.
coverage of this Zoning District.
coverage of this Zoning District.
overage of this Zoning District.
HEIGHT
Maximum Building Height and
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Number of Stories except for
and 1 story.
and 1 story.
Public uses having a "Public
Animal husbandry or agricultural
Animal husbandry or agricultural
Suffix" (P) designation 8,9
related structures— 2 stories and
related structures — 2 stories
Animal husbandry related
Animal husbandry related
0 ft.
and 30 ft.
structures — 2 stories and 30 ft.
structures — 2 stories and 30 ft.
MINIMUM SETBACKS
General
ft. from any residential
ft. from any residential
ft. from any residential
ft. from any residential
structure, if sited closer than 6
structure, if sited closer than 6
structure, if sited closer than 6
tructure, if sited closer than 6
ft., the structure will be
t., the structure will be
ft., the structure will be
t., the structure will be
considered to be attached.
considered to be attached.
considered to be attached.
onsidered to be attached.
tables, and other animal
ATTACHMENT`B"
4-2-110B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached Accessory Structures)5
RC
R-1
R-5
R-8
husbandry related structures
Stables, and other animal
Stables, and other animal
Stables, and other animal
ee RMC 44-010. Agricultural
iusbandry related structures
husbandry related structures
husbandry related structures
elated structures — 50 ft. from
see RMC 4-4-010. Agricultural
see RMC 4-4-010.
see RMC 4-4-010.
any property line.
elated structures — 50 ft. from
any propertyline.
Side Yards
5 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
ear of the house and the rear
ear of the house and the rear
ear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
roperty line, then 0 ft. side yard
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
is allowed.
is allowed.
is allowed.
is allowed.
Rear Yards
5 ft., except that garages,
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
ft. unless located between the
carports, and parking areas
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
must be set back from the rear
roperty line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property lines a sufficient
is allowed. Garages, carports
is allowed. Garages, carports
is allowed. Garages, carports
istance to provide a minimum
and parking areas must be set
and parking areas must be setand
parking areas must be set
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either
ack from the rear property line
jack from the rear property line
back from the rear property line
on -site or on improved rights -of-
3 sufficient distance to provide a
3 sufficient distance to provide a
sufficient distance to provide a
ay, where parking is accessed
minimum of 24 ft. of back -out
minimum of 24 ft. of back -out
minimum of 24 ft. of back -out
from the rear of the lot.
oom, either on -site or on
oom, either on -site or on
room, either on -site or on
improved rights -of -way, where
improved rights -of -way, where
improved rights -of -way, where
arking is accessed from the
arking is accessed from the
parking is accessed from the
ear of the lot.
ear of the lot.
rear of the lot.
Front Yard/Side Yard Along
Accessory structures are not
Accessory structures are not
Occessory structures are not
Accessory structures are not
Streets
permitted within required front
oermitted within required front
ermitted within required front
permitted within required front
ards or side yards along
ards or side yards along
ards or side yards along
ards or side yards along
treets.
treets.
3treets.
treets.
Clear Vision Area
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
tear vision area defined in
clear vision area defined in
lear vision area defined in
clear vision area defined in
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
PARKING
General
ee RMC 4-4-080.
ee RMC 4-4-080.
JEee RMC 4-4-080.
ee RMC 4-4-080.
CRITICAL AREAS
General
ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
Isee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
Isee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
Isee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
ATTACHMENT "C"
4-2-110G'
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached12 Accessory Structures)
R-10 R-14 RM
MAXIMUM NUMBER AND SIZE
General
structures, up to a maximum of 720
1 per residential unit.
The lot coverage of the primary
q. ft. for each building, or 1 structure up
residential structure.along with all
o a maximum of 1,000 sq. ft.
Maximum of 400 sq. ft. and less than
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
he floor area of the principal unit.
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
The total floor area of all accessory
District.
buildings shall not be greater than the
The lot coverage of the primary
floor area of the residential uses.
residential structure along with all
Accessory structures shall only be
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
allowed on lots in conjunction with a
The lot coverage of the primary
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
primary use.
esidential structure along with all
District.
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
Accessory structures shall only be
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
allowed on lots in conjunction with a
District.
primary use.
Accessory structures shall only be
allowed on lots in conjunction with a
primary residential use.
LOCATION
General
NA
NA
"U" Suffix
Garages and carports shall only access
from the alley when lots abut an alley.
When lots do not abut an alley, garages
nd carports shall be located in the rear
and or side yard.
HEIGHT
Maximum Number of Stories and
1 story and 15 ft.
15 ft.
25 ft., except in the RM-U District where
Maximum Building Height 21
the maximum height shall be
determined through the site plan review
process.
ATTACHMENT "C"
4-2-110G
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached12 Accessory Structures)
R-10 R-14 RM
SETBACKS
Minimum Front Yard
Not allowed within the required front
Not allowed within the required front
Not allowed within the required front
yards or side yards along streets.
yards or side yards along streets.
yards or side yards along streets.
Minimum Side Yard
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
Side Yard: None required.
ft. unless located between the rear of
he house and the rear property line,
the house and the rear property line,
hen 0 ft. side yard is allowed. Garages,
hen 0 ft. side yard is allowed. Garages,
arports and parking areas must be set
mrports and parking areas must be set
ack from the rear property line a
ack from the rear property line a
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
r counting improved alley surface or
or counting improved alley surface or
other improved right-of-way surface.11other
improved right-of-way surface.11
Minimum Rear Yard
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
ft. unless located between the rear of
he house and the rear property line,
the house and the rear property line,
he house and the rear property line,
hen 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages,
then 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages
hen 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages,
carports and parking areas must be set
and carports must provide a minimum of
arports and parking areas must be set
back from the rear property line a
24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site or
ack from the rear property lines a
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
counting improved alley surface or other
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
improved right-of-way surface.
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
r counting improved alley surface or
or counting improved alley surface or
22
other improved right-of-way surface.11other
improved right-of-way surface.
Special Setbacks for Animal
See RMC 4-4-010.
NA
NA
Husbandry Related Structures
Clear Vision Area
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
eight intrude into the 20' clear vision
eight intrude into the 20' clear vision
eight intrude into the 20' clear vision
rea defined in RMC 4-11-030.
area defined in RMC 4-11-030.
rea defined in RMC 4-11-030.
CRITICAL AREAS
eneral Oee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090. Oee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090. ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
�Zo03
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. Soo b'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 4-1-180 OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION
AND ENFORCEMENT, AND SECTION 4-3-050.P OF CHAPTER 3,
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, OF
TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.
4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY REORGANIZING THE SECTIONS
TO MAKE THEM CONSISTENT WITH TITLE IV'S FORMAT AND TO
BE MORE USER-FRIENDLY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-1-180 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-1-180 PUBLIC WORKS FEES:
A. LATECOMER'S AGREEMENT APPLICATION FEES:
The following fees are associated with the application by a developer for a latecomer's
agreement.
Processing fee (Nonrefundable)
Fee to be due and payable at time of application
$500 if amount covered by latecomer's is $20,000 or
less
$1,000 if amount covered by latecomer's is between
$20,000 and $100,000
$2,000 if amount covered by latecomer's is greater than
$100,000
Latecomer's Agreement —Administration, 15% of total amount to be collected if amount covered
processing, and collection fee by latecomer is $20,000 or less;
Fee to be collected by deduction from each 10% if amount covered by latecomer is between
individual latecomer fee payment and the $20,000 and $100,000;
balance forwarded to the holder of the 5% if amount covered by latecomer is greater than
latecomer's agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5-9, $100,000;
Tender of Fee.
ORDINANCE NO.
Segregation processing fee, if applicable I $750 1
B. PUBLIC WORKS PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES:
All developers, municipal or quasi -municipal entities, or utility corporations or
companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted
entities include City -franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and
electrical power. Half of this fee must be paid upon application and the remainder when the
permit(s) is issued. There are additional construction permit fees which are also payable upon
issuance. The fee will be based upon percentages of the estimated cost of improvements using
the following formula:
2
ORDINANCE NO.
C. PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
The following public works construction permit fees, utility permit fees, and miscellaneous
charges are payable at or prior to the time of construction permit issuance.
1. WATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
HOW `;e . ,' ►. Heir e""I l - �n. 1 . e 4-
$40.00
Water meter tests for 3/4" to 2" meter
Water meter tests for meters greater than 2"
Time and materials cost ($60.00 deposit)
Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests
conducted by others
Time and materials
Installation fees for ring and cover castings
$200.00
Service size reductions
$50.00
Water service disconnection (cut at main)
$250.00
Meter resets
$50.00
Repair of damage to service
$50.00
Water main connections
$400.00
Water main cut and cap
$1,000.00
Water quality/inspection/purity tests
$40.00 each
Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc.)
Cost of test plus $40.00 processing fee
Water turn ons/offs after hours
$60.00
Installation of isolation valve
Time and materials $2,000.00 deposit
New water line chlorination fee
$250.00 plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after
the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet.
Miscellaneous water installation fees
Time and materials
3
ORDINANCE NO.
2. WATER METER INSTALLATION FEES — CITY INSTALLED: The following
fees are payable at the time of application for water meter installation(s).
3/4" meter installed by City within City limits $1,300.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$240.00 (meter drop in)
3/4" meter installed by City outside City limits $1,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$240.00 (meter drop in)
1" meter installed by City $1,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$250.00 (meter drop in)
1-1/2" meter installed by City $2,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$300.00 (meter drop in)
2" meter installed by City $2,800.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$370.00 (drop in)
3. bVAT+ETER PROCESSING FEES — APPLICANT INSTALLED: For
meters larger than two inches (2"), applicant provides materials and installs. City charges a two
hundred dollar ($200.00) processing fee at the time of meter application.
4. WASTEWATE ANDJSURFACE WATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
Residential
$60.00 each connection
$60.00 each connection
Commercial
$80.00 each connection
$80.00 each connection
Industrial
$100.00 each connection
$100.00 each connection
Repair of any of the above
$50.00 each service
$50.00 each connection
Cut and Cap / Demolition Permit
$30.00 each service
$30.00 each service
Ground Water Discharge (Temporary
$150.00
N/A
connection to sanitary sewer system for one
time discharge of contaminated ground
water to 50,000 gallons)
Ground Water Discharge (Temporary
$100.00 + Billed for current
N/A
connection to sanitary sewer system for
Renton and King County
discharge of contaminated ground water
sewer rate on discharged
over 50,000 gallons)
amount. (meter provided by
property owner)
4
ORDINANCE NO.
5. WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY — CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: (Utility and
Street/Sidewalk Improvements): A bond as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond, is
also required.
Exception: No permit fee shall be charged for individual homeowners for work in
street rights -of -way for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems.
D. FRANCHISE PERMITS:
Utilities providing service within the City of Renton (Cable TV, cable modem, natural
gas, telecommunications, and electrical) shall do so under approved agreement with the City.
Construction by one of these utilities within rights of way, easements, and on public property is
subject to a permit. Permit fees are subject to the terms within each individual franchise
agreement. If a franchise agreement does not specify the timing of fees, the fee shall be due and
payable at or prior to the time of construction permit issuance. If a franchise agreement does not
specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in the following table shall be collected. A
bond as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond, is also required.
ORDINANCE NO.
E. RELEASE OF EASEMENT FEES:
The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are
detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements.
_a
$250.00 payable at time of application
Filing fee
Processing fee
(Paid once Council approves the release)
$250.00 payable upon Council approval of the release
of easement
F. RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT FEES — REVOCABLE PERMITS FOR THE USE OF
EXCESS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY:
These fees are payable at the time of application. The imposition, collection, payment and
other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-2 RMC, Excess Right -of -Way
Use.
NONNI
$10.00 annually, plus leasehold excise tax , if
Single family and two-family uses
applicable
All uses without public benefit
0.5% per month of property value of land to be
utilized, plus leasehold excise tax2, if applicable.
Payable yearly in advance.
Uses with public benefit
0.5% per year of assessed value of land adjoining the
property, plus leasehold excise tax2, if applicable. In
no case less than ten dollars ($10.00). Payable yearly
in advance.
t Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County
Assessor.
2 There is hereby imposed a leasehold excise tax against fees so determined which are two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per
annum or more. Such tax shall be imposed at the rate as established by the State of Washington, Department of Revenue.
Insurance Required: Public liability and property damage insurance is also required
pursuant to RMC 9-2-5.B, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right -of -Way Use.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Exception for Public Agencies: A no fee permit may be issued only when the applicant is a
public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the
public (e.g., METRO applications for right-of-way for bus shelters).
G. STREET AND ALLEY VACATION FEES:
The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are
detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations.
Filing fee
$250.00 payable at time of application
Processing and completion fee
$250.00 payable upon Council approval of the
vacation
H. TEMPORARY UTILITY CONNECTION FEES:
eU
z-
Temporary connections to a City utility
Annual fee equal to ten percent
Annual fee equal to ten percent
system may be granted for a one-time,
(10%) of the current system
(10%) of the current system
temporary, short-term use of a portion
development charge applicable
development charge applicable to
of the property for a period not to
to that portion of the property,
that portion of the property, but
exceed three (3) consecutive years
but not less than three hundred
not less than seven hundred fifty
fifty dollars ($350.00) per year'
dollars ($750.00) per years
ISaid fee shall be paid annually (nonprorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to
another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system.
The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development
service area for use in the fee determination.
CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES:
Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not been
assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities, such as water
systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements
including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more of the charges listed in the
following subsections. Any fees triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this
section, are due and payable at the first of the following instances:
Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit, or
VA
ORDINANCE NO.
• Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family residential short plat,
or .
• Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
All of the following charges shall be paid into the Waterworks Utility Construction Fund
except that any fees collected under a private Latecomer's Agreement shall be passed on to the
holder of the agreement with the appropriate fees paid to the general fund. For the purposes of
this section the terms property(ies) or parcel(s) shall mean a lot of record as defined in Chapter
11 of this Title.
1. Private Held Latecomer's Fees and Special Assessment District (formerly known
as City held Latecomer's) Fees:
a. Applicability of Private Held Latecomer's Fee: The City has the
discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9-5 RMC, to grant latecomer's agreements to
developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rata portion of public works facilities
(water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements
including signalization and lighting) they install and turn over to the City.
b. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment
charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rata portion of the original costs of public
works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and
street improvements including signalization and lighting) from the owners of property who
would benefit from future connections to, or future users of, improvements to the City's
infrastructure that were not installed by LIDs or by a private developer under a latecomer
agreement. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges
ORDINANCE NO.
are detailed in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be charged
pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Payments to City.
Exemptions for Latecomer's or Special Assessment District Fees:
i. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private
developer latecomer's fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of land per RMC
4-1-180.I.3 below.
11. Rc11�f 1-- i LV I V (G f SLllllar F at,111LIQ". T 11G
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer's
or special assessment district fee/assessment if the property has a benefit from either (but not
both) of two (2) similar facilities. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will make
the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(s) benefit and/or are
utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that associated with the utilized facility. If
there are no sound engineering or policy reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City
shall give the applicant the choice of facilities to utilize.
iii. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer's
agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the latecomer's
agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that the assessment against a
parcel be divided such that a single family residential connection will be assessed based upon the
size of a typical single family residential lot in that area. The remainder of the cost attributed to
said site will be due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased
density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue on the
remaining portion of the assessment.
M
ORDINANCE NO.
iv. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer's
assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose other than single
family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front footage, area, or other equitable
means. Consideration may be given to adjusting the assessment between the new parcels, based
upon value of benefit from the improvements, such that two similar parcels may pay different
amounts because one receives more benefit.
2. System Development Charges (SDC) — Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water:
The City may hold and charge certain other fees similar to special assessment district
charges, which are commonly referred to as "system development charges."
a. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development
charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said properties
which have not been assessed or charged or borne, an equitable share of the cost of the City's
utility systems. Said property owner(s) shall pay, prior to connection to or benefit from a City
utility or utility facility, the system development charge associated with that utility as detailed in
the fees table in subsecti n 4-1-180.I.2.b° fthis section. A parcel may benefit from a City
�
utility system during the development or redevelopment of the property with or without. a
connection to an established facility. Therefore, the system development charge for a utility may
be triggered without a physical connection to an existing facility.
i. Development of a utility System shall mean:
Development of the Sanitary Sewer System, including but not
limited to lift stations, force mains, interceptors and other Sewer collection mains.
10
ORDINANCE NO.
Development of the Surface Water System, including but not
limited to retention / detention or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements,
lift stations, force mains, interceptors, and other surface water collection and conveyance
systems.
Development of the Water System, including but not limited to
wells, pump stations, reservoirs and transmission mains.
ii. The phrase "properties, which have not been assessed or charged
or borne an equitable share of the cost of the utility," as used in this Section, shall mean any of
the following:
First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property which has
not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the
property and which is connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time
(including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or conversion from
septic system).
Further Subdivision: Any property which has not paid a system
development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and is
served or benefited by the utility and is subdividing further for single family usage shall receive a
credit for the existing single family residence(s).
For example, a five (5) acre parcel with an existing single family house is being
subdivided for single family lots. If the existing house is connected to the City sewer and water
systems, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for
sanitary sewer, storm water, and water. If the existing house was not connected to the City sewer
II
ORDINANCE NO.
system, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for
storm water and water.
A property subdividing further for single family usage that receives a credit for existing
single family residence(s) shall not qualify for prorating of the system development charge under
subsection 180.I.2.c.
Existing Developments - Water and/or Sanitary Sewer:
Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances
for water and sanitary sewer in 1974 is exempted from the connection charge(s) for water and
sanitary sewer. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not
require additional water usage such that a fire hydrant, additional meter, or larger meter is
necessary will not trigger a new System Development Charge. However, except as provided
herein, when property is redeveloped or the use changed or intensified such that larger or
additional water meter(s) or the addition of a fire hydrant is necessary, application(s) for these
items will trigger the system development charge(s). An application for the installation of a
meter(s) solely for the purpose of either irrigation or fire protection or the installation of a fire
hydrant will trigger a system development charge for water. An application for an additional or
a larger water meter(s) for any purpose other than solely for irrigation or fire protection will
trigger a system development charge for both water and sewer.
Exceptions:
The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single-family residential dwelling
will not trigger a system development charge for water or sewer.
If an existing single family residence is being remodeled or rebuilt and remains a single
family residence on the same lot (not involved in a new plat, short plat, or lot line adjustment),
12
ORDINANCE NO.
the addition of a larger or additional meter will not trigger the system development charges for
water or sewer.
The addition of a second meter to an existing duplex in order to divide consumption for
billing purposes will not trigger a system development charge.
Existing Developments — Surface Water: Property that was
developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for surface
(storm) water in 1992 is exempted from the surface water System Development Charge. The
addition of any new impervious surface to exempted properties will require payment of the
System Development Charge for surface water for the additional new impervious area only. If an
exempted property is making a connection for the first time to a surface water system, it will
require payment of the System Development Charge for surface water only for the impervious
area tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted
property that does not create additional impervious surface area or does not cause a first time
connection to be made will not require payment of the System Development Charge for surface
water.
Exceptions:
Improvements to existing single family residential units such as additions that are less
than 500 square feet, decks, small sheds and other minor improvements are exempt from the
system development charge for surface water unless a new connection to the Renton surface
water utility collection system is proposed or required as part of the permit application.
13
ORDINANCE NO.
b. System Development Charge Table:
$760.00 per dwelling
$525.00 per dwelling
Single family
$1,105.00 per dwelling
residence
unit
unit
unit
Mobile/Manufactured
$885.00 per dwelling
$610.00 per dwelling
$525.00 per dwelling
Homes located in a
unit
unit
unit
mobile home or
manufactured home
park
Multi -family
$665.00 per dwelling
$455.00 per dwelling
$0.183 per square foot
unit, (auxiliary
unit, (auxiliary
of new impervious
(in all zones except
buildings like club
buildings like club
surfacing, but not less
CD and COR zones)
houses are considered
houses are considered
than $525.00
inclusive to the
inclusive to the
development and are
development and are
not counted as a
not counted as a
dwelling unit and are
dwelling unit and are
thus not included in the
thus not included in the
calculation of the fee)
calculation of the fee)
Mixed Use
Mixed use buildings
Mixed use buildings
$0.183 per square foot
with over 50% floor
with over 50% floor
of new impervious
(in all zones except
space used for
space used for
surface, but not less
CD and COR zones)
residential shall be
residential shall be
than $525.00
assessed at the rate of
assessed at the rate of
$665.00 per dwelling
$455.00 per dwelling
unit
unit
CD and COR zones
$0.154 per gross
$0.106 per gross
$0.183 per square foot
square foot of property,
square foot of property,
of new impervious, but
but not less than
but not less than
not less than $525.00
$1,105.00
$760.00
All other uses
$0.154 per gross
$0.106 per gross
$0.183 per square foot
square foot of property,
square foot of property,
of new impervious
but not less than
but not less than
surface, but not less
$1,105.00
$760.00
than $525.00
C. Prorating the System Development Charge for Redevelopment of
Property: An option exists for prorating the system development charge(s) for property which
14
ORDINANCE NO.
has not previously paid a charge in full. Any parcel that currently has water or sanitary sewer
service. is eligible for a prorated system development charge for the associated utility.
i. Prorating based upon meter sizes: The prorated system
development charge will be based upon the capacity of the new meters as compared to the
capacity of the existing meters.
Meters installed solely for fire protection, either existing or proposed are not included in
the calculation for water or sanitary sewer. If there is an additional or larger meter solely for fire
flow or additional hydrants required for the proposed development, please refer also to sub-
section d.ii, below. Meters installed solely for irrigation (either existing or proposed) are not
included in the calculation for sanitary sewer.
This prorated redevelopment charge is calculated using the following formula:
[Proposed meter(s) capacity in gallons per minute (GPM) — Existing meter(s) capacity in
GPM] / [Proposed meter(s) capacity in GPM] x [SDC Fee] = Amount owed.
The City will determine the safe maximum operating capacities of all meter sizes using
American Water Works Association tables (see below). The fee paid shall be posted in the City's
database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel.
Reduction in meter capacity shall not result in a payment from the City to the applicant.
15
ORDINANCE NO.
WATER METER EQUIVALENCIES for purposes of calculating redevelopment
credit:
�
... K
1
1
ii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Fire Protection
Improvements associated with redevelopment of property:
Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system, such as a new hydrant or
fire sprinkler system shall be charged a fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the system
development charge applicable to the portion of the parcel containing the improvements for
which the fire protection system is constructed to serve. Thirty percent (30%) is the amount the
water utility has expended throughout its system for fire flow protection. This fee shall be posted
to the City's database and applied as a partial payment to the total system development charge
applicable for the parcel.
For the purposes of this section, `portion of the parcel containing the improvements for
which the fire protection system is constructed to serve' shall be described as:
The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the
square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around
the footprint of the building being served by the meter installed for fire protection.
16
ORDINANCE NO.
The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the
square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around
.the footprint of the building(s) which by their construction, reconstruction or
improvement triggered the need for the new fire hydrant(s).
`Footprint' shall include the primary building plus ancillary structures such as garages,
carports, sheds, etc. that are considered by the Fire Department when calculating fire flow
requirements. In the case of multiple improvements, overlapping areas shall only be counted
once.
If the `portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection
system is constructed to serve' is eighty percent (80%) of the parcel or more, then the thirty
percent (30%) shall be calculated on the total square footage of the property.
If a project both increases water meter capacity and installs a fire protection system, the
total of both prorated system development fees (subsections i and ii) would be charged. Payment
of said fees would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development
charge applicable for the parcel. In no case shall the total of the prorated system development
charge(s) be more than the total system development charge applicable for the parcel.
Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system shall not trigger a sewer
system development fee.
iii. Prorating the System Development Charge for installation of an
Irrigation Meter only:
When a water meter is installed solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water for
private landscaping (exempt meter), there will be charged a fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the
water system development charge applicable to the property. Said fee shall be nonrefundable,
nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another. Payment of said fee would be
posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for
17
ORDINANCE NO.
the parcel. At the applicant's option, the full water system development charge may be paid
instead of the ten percent (10%) payment described herein.
iv. Examples:
Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home
on a ten thousand (10,000) square foot lot with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter
(5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20)
gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one-half inch (1-1/2") meter
with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100) GPM can apply to pay for the following
prorated charges:
(100 GPM — 20 GPM) / (100 GPM) = 0.8
For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.154/sq. ft.) _ $1,231.00
For sewer: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.106/sq. ft.) _ $848.00
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.106/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq.
ft. _ $1,060.00 for Sewer and paid $0.154/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq. ft. _ $1,540.00 for water.
Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes
a single family home with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a
standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) GPM. The new
development will be an eight (8) unit multi -family dwelling with a two inch (2") meter with a
safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation
meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch (4") meter for fire
sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges:
89.5%
For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM) / (160 GPM + 30 GPM) _
In
based on fire service
Total
ORDINANCE NO.
= 30%
= 119.5%
Therefore, 100% of the water system development charge would be due.
(8 units x $665.00 / unit = $5,320.00
For sewer: based on meters — irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM — 20 GPM) / (160
GPM) = 87.5%
Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due.
87.5% x (8 units x $445.00 / unit = $3,115.00
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $445.00 / unit x 8 units =
$3,560.00.
d. Exemptions to System Development Charge:
i. Installation of an Irrigation Meter solely for the purpose of
providing irrigation water to City Right-of-way: Installation of a water meter solely for the
purpose of providing irrigation water to City right-of-way is exempted from the System
Development Charge.
ii. Exemption for City -Owned Property: No system development
charge will be collected on City -owned properties. The benefits to the utility from the use of
other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other benefits offset the amount
of the system development charge.
iii. Limited Exemptions for Municipal Corporations: A limited
exemption to the system development charge will be granted to municipal corporations for
portions of property subject to the system development charge to the extent that those specific
areas are available and maintained at all times for public use (e.g., ballfields adjacent to a school
19
ORDINANCE NO.
building) and shall be segregated from the fee determination as herein provided. In applying this
exemption to the extent possible, a single straight line shall be drawn across the property
separating the exempt property from the property to be charged. If a single straight line would
not achieve substantial equity, then additional lines may be drawn to include substantial open
space areas in the exemption. For purposes of this exemption, substantial open space areas shall
be at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet in area. Lines shall not be drawn closer
than fifteen feet (15') to any structure.
Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots, driveways, walkways, similar
areas and required landscape areas shall not be part of the exempt area.
Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's
administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording the segregated fee. At the time
of application for system development charge segregation the applicant shall pay the
administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00).
Restrictive Covenants: The exemption must be memorialized by
means of a restrictive covenant running with the land. Should the property exempted under this
Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge in place at the
time of development.
Interpretation of Partial Payment: The Administrator of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on the interpretation
of this limited exemption and the achievement of substantial equity.
iv. Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped
Major Easement(s): When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge,
undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the
20
ORDINANCE NO.
property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the
responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying
the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any
easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the
development charge(s).
The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the
property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or
landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this
exemption.
V. Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements: If an applicant's
project proposes to solve a regional drainage problem, over and above the requirements to
mitigate their project's impacts, the value of the additional improvement shall be credited toward
the surface water system development charges due. The applicant must provide the
Administrator of the Department of PlanningBuilding/Public Works with the costs of the
drainage improvements and a suggested method of calculating the costs due to the extra work
done to solve a regional drainage problem. The Administrator will make the final decision on the
amount of the credit. In no instance shall the credit duplicate a latecomer's agreement such that
the applicant will be paid twice, nor may the credit against the connection charge exceed the
connection charge (i.e., no payment to the applicant under this Section).
vi. Surface Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments
which infiltrate or contain on site one -hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff
volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the surface water system
development charge. For the application of this credit, the owner/developer must use the current
21
ORDINANCE NO.
design criteria to show that the infiltration facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff
produced from the site during the one hundred (100) year storm.
If a development that is granted an exemption under this section discharges water offsite
during a hundred year storm or less, the development shall be required to make corrections or
improvements to the onsite system such that it will infiltrate up to the hundred year storm. If, in
the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one -hundred percent (100%) of the on -site
storm water runoff from a one hundred (100) year storm, the systems development charge shall
be due and payable as a condition of the connection to or utilization of the City's storm water
system.
Nothing in this section shall relieve the property owner(s) from complying with the
City's current flow control and water quality treatment standards at the time the development
converts from one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a
development is converted from one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm
system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing conditions prior
to the property being developed under the one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration exemption
and the developed conditions at the time the conversion is made.
There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely prohibit the use of
infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard prohibits or limits the use of
infiltration facilities to any level below the one hundred (100) year storm, the development will
not qualify for this exemption.
3. Segregation Criteria and Rules:
Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for the
segregation of system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charges in the
22
ORDINANCE NO.
partial development of a large parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the
following criteria and rules:
Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the basis
of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel size. Unplatted or
large -platted parcels may be platted or short -platted prior to development, in which case the
system development charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed.
b. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial development
of a large tract of property the owner may apply for a segregation of the system development,
special assessment district, and latecomer's charge(s) for the specific portion of the property to
be developed. The burden of establishing the segregation by legal description, number of units,
and map would be on the party owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall
determine the segregation of fees:
i. Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the
exception of single family residential and mobile home developments. When a parcel is
segregated by administrative determination, prorating of the system development charge for
redevelopment shall not be allowed.
ii. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal,
written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall be recorded
as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive covenant shall list the percentage
of the system development charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall
also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the proposed
development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as described in the legal
description, for the system development charge determination.
23
ORDINANCE NO.
iii. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for
determination and payment of system development charge(s) shall be two (2) acres. The
segregated area shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for
which the system development charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings; driveways
and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access areas; storm drainage
facilities and detention ponds; and improvements required for mitigation of environmental
impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The boundary line for the segregation
of system development charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall not
be closer than fifteen feet (15') to any structure.
iv. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of
undeveloped property for which the system development charge is deferred shall be two (2)
acres. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later develop, then that property
shall pay the system development charge fee in place at the time of development. Should the
property partially paid for under this Section later be subdivided, then the partial payment credit
shall run with the subdivided lots. The burden of establishing that the partial payment has been
made would be on the party owing the fee and not on the City.
V. Determination of Charge: The system development charge shall be
determined on the basis of the percentage of a property that is developed (existing development
plus proposed development). When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of
full development, as described in this Section, one -hundred percent (100%) of the systems
development charge(s) is owed and any balance is due and payable.
vi. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, "full
development" is considered to be sixty percent (60%) property coverage for multi -family
24
ORDINANCE NO.
development and eighty percent (80%) property coverage for commercial, industrial, mixed use,
and all other development. "Property coverage" is defined as the portion of the property
supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public
access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for
mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
vii. Developed Area: The "developed area" shall include, but not be
limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charges
have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas,
grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and
improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts.
viii. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's
administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the
fee(s). At the time of application for system development charge partial payment the applicant
shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) for each segregation. If
the same segregation is used for more than one utility's system development charge, than only
one administrative fee is collected.
ix. Interpretation: The Administrator of the Planninouilding/Public
Works Department shall make the final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of
system development charges.
SECTION II. Section 4-3-050.P of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Special Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
P. (Reserved)
25
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION III.
30 days after publication.
This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1004: 8/ 16/02: ma.
day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
911
T. 22N.9R.5E., W.M. T.23N.9R.5E., W.M.
F. A. NH-0167(030)
IE
SCALE IN FEET
is\DESIGN\SR 167 Gorrlson,& Sprin brooM n\vlcmap.d n
Lake'
5
02T35s29 PM
apa }r.TE. FED.AID PROJ.NO.
Io' rrasH
�A NH-0167t030I
OIA06.0
O.TWT w. LOCATION MG.
GATE
►.[. St•r so:
°i�C
►.C. star rmc
�
wI/
Washington State
Dennrtment of Transportation
SR 167
UPPER SPRINGBROOK CREEK
CULVERT REPLACEMENT
V..,INITYMAP
PL07
t2i, 2oot
VI
BY F. HEIGL
BY HEIGL
BY A. ONAR
SHEET
or
sNEETs
GR,, I. GOLLER
C
ADM. L. ENG REVISION 7ACTEBY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT IN THE
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONE
7:30 PM, JANUARY 13, 2003
RENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,1055 SOUTH GRADY
WAY
A public hearing will be held on Monday, January 13, 2003 in the Renton City Council
Chambers to consider the moratorium on development in the Heavy Industrial zone.
On December 20, 2002, the Renton City Council enacted a six-month moratorium on
development of property in the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone. The purpose of the
moratorium is to allow the City time, during what is anticipated to be a period of
accelerating change, to analyze its industrial land. It is critical for the City to determine if
continued or expanded heavy industrial uses in current locations meet the goals of the
City of Renton Business Plan and Comprehensive Plan vision.
Land zoned for heavy industrial use is primarily concentrated in the Valley and North
Renton. The six-month moratorium precludes development that is subject to State
Environmental Policy Act review on all land zoned for heavy industrial uses.
The Valley has seen subtle changes in recent years from traditional manufacturing,
warehousing and other uses commonly thought of as heavy industrial. There has been a
slowing of new heavy industrial uses while hotels, restaurants, theater/entertainment, and
retail commercial uses have proliferated. These changes may be typical of industrial
lands nationwide.
More significantly, in North Renton, other factors dictate a thorough review of the heavy
industrially zoned land. A portion of IH zoned land is within the Employment Area —
Transition (Interim) Comprehensive Plan designation. As clearly stated in the name, this
area was identified as both a transition area and a temporary designation. The EA-T
needs to be evaluated as a land use designation, permanent policies developed, and
appropriate zoning applied.
The remainder of the IH zoned land in North Renton is within the Employment Area —
Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation. Most of this land is also within the City'. s
designated Urban Center. The Urban Center designation meets the criteria of the
Countywide Planning Policies as the area of the City in which the majority of the
protected population growth to the year 2030 will be directed. The City is also
committed to preserving jobs in this area.
A plan is needed that acknowledges the pending changes to this area of the City and
recognizes that commerce, jobs, and housing are not incompatible.
If you have questions please contact Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Acting Administrator, at (425)
430-6592.
City of Renton
City Council
Moratorium
Public Hearing
January 13, 2003
Background Summary
• Growth Management Act mandates
review of Comprehensive Plans
• Plans must be consistent with City
policies
• Plans must reflect updated
demographics (2000 census data became
available in 2002)
• An amended Comprehensive Plan must
be adopted by the City Council by
December 2004
Study of Industrial Uses
• Industrial uses and industrially zoned
land were identified as key issues
• The nature of industrial uses and
industrial -zoned land is undergoing
change
• High -intensity uses are evolving into
those that produce fewer, less
significant impacts
• Changes of this type are anticipated in
the Employment Areas (Transition,
Industrial, and Valley) of the City
Issue:
Renton has enacted a six-month
moratorium on development within the
City's Heavy Industrial zones.
Current Status
• In 2002, the Comprehensive Plan
update was initiated by the City Council
• The current Plan was reviewed by staff
of all departments, the Planning
Commission, and the Planning and
Development Committee of the City
Council
• Issues were identified for which revision
of the Comprehensive Plan would be
required
Allowed Uses in IH
• Big -box retail
• Body shops & large vehicle repair
• Car washes & fuel dealers
• Large & small vehicle sales
• Auto impoundment yard
• Self-service storage
• Warehousing
• Waste recycling and transfer facilities
1
Industrially
zoned land in
Renton
Where are the industrial
areas of the City?
North Renton
• "Employment Area —Industrial"
• "Employment Area — Transition"
The Valley
• "Employment Area —Valley"
Employment Area -
Valley
• Provides a mix of employment -based
uses
• Includes commercial, office, and
industrial zones
• Recent new uses include hotels and
entertainment uses
• Has been transitioning from heavy
industrial use
Employment Area -
Transition
• Provides for transition of traditional
industrial area to employment -based
and residential uses
• Employment uses include commercial,
office, industrial, and research
• Was adopted on an interim basis (2001)
• Zoning was not adopted
2
The New Economy
• National trend away from traditional
industrial uses
• New technology and science -based
companies are different than traditional
heavy industry
• Employees require more services and
amenities
• Traditional industrial expansion could
harm ability to recruit growth industries
Renton's
`\ �\ Urban
Center
mR .
inn
Employment Area -
Industrial
• Intended to protect existing heavy
industrial businesses
• Current policies emphasize existing
industrial uses
Additional Aspects of
this Issue
• GMA mandates that cities
accommodate a prescribed portion of
future population growth
• Renton's policies direct the largest
proportion of this growth to the City's
Urban Center
• Current EM and I do not allow
residential use
The Urban Center
• Renton's Urban Center meets the "Urban
Centers" criteria of the Countywide Planning
Polices
• The CPP defines Urban Centers as areas of
concentrated employment and housing with
access to transit service and a wide range of
other uses such as retail, recreation, public
facilities, parks, and open space.
3
The Urban Center
The Urban Center will provide the largest
amount of housing to meet Renton's share of
projected growth.
The residential population will balance the
employment population and further the policy
goal of a "50/50 ratio" of jobs to housing.
Renton's Urban Center consists of the Urban
Center Downtown and the Urban Center
Transition (North Renton).
Conclusion
New industrial development could have
significant negative impact on City's
goals and vision
Approximately six months will be
required to complete the required
analysis, public hearing process,
planning, policy formulation, and
Council action
Revised Language
City's intent was always to allow
existing Boeing operations to continue
New clarifying language:
—"...provided that this moratorium does not
apply to the construction, modification or
operation of any airplane manufacturing
facility (or supporting uses) located in the
IH zone."
Summary
The City must position its Employment
Areas to capitalize on next economic
growth cycle
Development under current zoning could
undermine the City's potential for
economic growth and the City's vision for
its future
Work Program is necessary at this time to
address current concerns and issues
Actions to Date
Notified affected property owners of IH
zoned land (and those within 300)
Continue working with individual
property owners to find solutions
On -going meetings with Boeing to
discuss vision and future land use
changes
Recommendation:
• Support six-month moratorium on
development beyond SEPA thresholds
in the IH zones in:
— Employment Area — Valley
— Employment Area — Industrial
— Employment Area — Transition
• Amend resolution to adopt revised
language
4
s
Testimony for Renton City Council Public Hearing on Moratorium
Monday, January 13, 2003
Honorable Mayor Tanner and members of the City Council, thank you for the
opportunity to speak to you this evening.
First on behalf of The Boeing Company, I would like to say we remain committed to
working together with you.
In December the council expressed its commitment to protect on -going operations at
the Renton site, there will be an amendment before you this evening ensuring that our
consolidation efforts and on -going operations will be protected if you choose to
continue this moratorium. And I urge your support of this amendment.
Over the past 2 weeks we have met with city management and staff and we are very
close to finalizing an agreement with regards to the surplus property and subsequent
planning process.
For over 50 years the Boeing Company and the City of Renton have worked as
partners on numerous projects.
Admittedly, future use of the surplused property will bring with it new challenges
neither of us has faced before. However, it is our hope the good working relationship
we have had in the past will help us both to meet those challenges in a way that
benefits both our company and the citizens of Renton.
Nonetheless, we are disappointed that the City of Renton has chosen to enact a
moratorium over all heavy industrial zoned properties. It is the Boeing Company's
position that this moratorium is unnecessary. However, if you choose to continue the
moratorium, we urge the City to use this time the moratorium is in place to
productively work with The Boeing Company to resolve issues so we can move
forward together to lay the foundation for the future generations of Renton.
We continue to look forward to our working together effort and I thank you for your
time and consideration.
Shaunta Hyde
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707, MC14-49
Seattle, WA 98124
athy'Wheeier Status pdate rt. _µ... . _,.. Page 1
From: "Hyde, Shaunta R" <shaunta.r.hyde@boeing.com>
To: "Kathy Keolker-Wheeler (E-mail)" <kwheeler@ci.renton.wa.us>, "King Parker (E-mail)"
<kparker@ci.renton.wa.us>, "Dan Clawson (E-mail)" <dclawson@seanet.com>, "Don Persson (E-mail)"
<dpersson@ci.renton.wa.us>, "Toni Nelson (E-mail)" <tnelson@ci.renton.wa.us>, "Terri Briere (E-mail)"
<tbriere@ci.renton.wa.us>, "Corman, Randy" <randy.corman@boeing.com>
Date: 1/11/2003 3:45:31 PM
Subject: Status Update
Members of the Renton City Council,
Please forgive me for not contacting you sooner as I had wanted to but we
have been in very productive discussions with city management and staff. The
Boeing Company and city management are still working towards the language
for the memorandum of understanding and are very close to reaching an
equitable solution.
I will be arriving early to answer any questions you may have. The Boeing
Company and city management have worked very hard these past few weeks and
its look doubtful that we will have an agreement finalized by Monday's
moratorium hearing. However, both sides are very aware that we need to
reach agreement for us to move forward and I am hopeful we will do so.
See you Monday.
Sincerely,
Shaunta R. Hyde
The Boeing Company
Local Government Relations Manager
(206) 544-0182 - direct
(206) 856-6444 - cell
(206)544-7204 -fax
e-mail: shaunta.r.hyde@boeing.com
CC: "Jesse Tanner (E-mail)" <jtanner@ci.renton.wa.us>
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS
AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 9, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,
Members of the Renton
VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayo
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting ministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588)
SUBJECT: Transmittal of Materials for Discussion of the Moratorium on
Development in the Heavy Industrial Zone
Please find the attached documents as background for the public hearing regarding the
moratorium scheduled for January 1 P. These include:
• Boeing- Renton Plant Preliminary Proposed Uses (map attached) —this document
outlines The Boeing Company's desired land use as outlined in its proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment filed December 16, 2002.
City of Renton Proposed Urban Center Comprehensive Plan Amendments (map
attached) --an outlined of the Administration's recommendations for land use in the North
Renton area.
• Proposed Land Use Comparison Matrix —a comparison of the two proposals.
There are several subtle, but key differences between the Boeing proposal and the initial
direction considered by the Administration:
1.) The Boeing concept does not include an analysis of Boeing Parking Lot 3B. Under its
proposal, this key parcel would remain in the Heavy Industrial zone and allow a wide
variety of uses ranging from manufacturing, distribution and bulk ("big box") retail.
2.) Boeing further proposes industrial uses and bulk retail (up to 75% of the land area) in areas
A, B, C, D and E in addition to the wide range of office, light industrial, retail, higher
education, residential and research and development activities.
k'
January 9, 2003
Page 2
3.) The Administration proposal would not allow light industrial, industrial or bulk retail in
Areas A and F but would allow the other high intensity activities. The City would allow
light industrial in Areas B, C, D, and E.
4.) The Administration proposal further expands the study area to include new zoning allowing
a mix of uses in a commercial corridor along Park Avenue and along the Cedar River.
Analysis of these areas, and therefore an examination of potential opportunities and impact
brought about by significant change to land use on the Boeing Plant to the surrounding
neighborhoods, would not take place under the Boeing proposal.
Attachments
cc: Jesse Tanner
Jay Covington
Gregg Zimmerman
Neil Watts
Lang Warren
DocumentV
f
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND
STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 9, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Presid nt
Renton City Council
VIA: Jesse Tanner, Ma or
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator (x6592)
SUBJECT: Industrial Land Use
As you know, the Renton City Council enacted a six-month moratorium on development
of property in the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone on December 20, 2002. A public hearing on
this matter is scheduled for Monday, January 13, 2003.
The purpose of the moratorium is to allow the City time, during what is anticipated to be
a period of accelerating change, to analyze its industrial land. It is critical for the City to
determine if continued or expanded heavy industrial uses in current locations meet the
goals of the City of Renton Business Plan and Comprehensive Plan vision.
Land zoned for heavy industrial use is primarily concentrated in the Valley and North
Renton. The six-month moratorium precludes development that is subject to State
Environmental Policy Act review on all land zoned for heavy industrial uses.
The Valley has seen subtle changes in recent years from traditional manufacturing,
warehousing and other uses commonly thought of as heavy industrial. There has been a
slowing of new heavy industrial uses while hotels, restaurants, theater/entertainment, and
retail commercial uses have proliferated. These changes may be typical of industrial
lands nationwide. The Planning Commission has seen a draft copy of proposed revised
policies for the Employment Area — Valley, as part of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment process, and should be able to make recommendations on needed changes
within the next few months.
More significantly, in North Renton, other factors dictate a thorough review of the heavy
industrially zoned land. A portion of 1H zoned land is within the Employment Area —
Transition (Interim) Comprehensive Plan designation. As clearly stated in the name, this
area was identified as both a transition area and a temporary designation. The EA-T
needs to be evaluated as a land use designation, permanent policies developed, and
appropriate zoning applied.
The remainder of the 1H zoned land in North Renton is within the Employment Area —
Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation. Most of this land is also within the City's
HAEDNSPTrojectsToeing P1antWloratoriumWlemo to CC 1.9.03.doc
r'
Industrial Land Use Memorandum
Page 2 of 2
designated Urban Center. The Urban Center designation meets the criteria of the
Countywide Planning Policies as the area of the City in which the majority of the
projected population growth to the year 2030 will be directed. The City is also
committed to preserving jobs in this area. A plan is needed that acknowledges the
pending changes to this area of the City and recognizes that commerce, jobs, and housing
are not incompatible.
Finally, the major concern facing the Administration is the fact that while this planning
effort is underway, there is nothing to prevent an application for expansion of existing or
creation of new industrial uses currently allowed under the existing zoning. Regardless of
any ongoing effort to change the Comprehensive Plan policies and zoning regulations, an
applicant could "vest" to the existing regulations by submitting substantially complete
building plans. The furtherance of industrial uses has the ability to delay or even derail
the opportunity for Renton to achieve its vision of being a "World Class City."
Discussions have taken place with The Boeing Company since the moratorium was
enacted and further talks will continue in attempt to reach some assurance that the City's
vision for these transitioning industrial areas are protected. However, decisions must be
made regarding the future of the area, new Comprehensive Plan policies developed,
zoning established, and assurance secured that the City's interests and vision will not
compromised. The City Administration, City Council, Planning and Development
Committee, Planning Commission, community, property owners, and City staff must all
contribute to the development of a viable plan for the area. Unless some other agreement
can be reached, the moratorium is the only mechanism provided to the City to afford time
during which this work can be accomplished most efficiently.
cc: Jesse Tanner
Jay Covington
Gregg Zimmerman
Neil Watts
Larry Warren
H:\EDNSP\Projects\l3oeing Plant\Moratorium\Memo to CC 1.9.03.doc\jw
BOEING - RENTON PLANT
PRELIMINARY PROPOSED USES
Currently, all areas are zoned Heavy Industrial. Boeing has proposed rezoning Subareas
A through E "when Boeing vacates and City commits to constructing arterials." Subarea
F would be rezoned "when Boeing vacates, City constructs arterials and interchanges
are fully funded. "
Sub -Area A (26.36 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR — East Logan (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Retail
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Light Industrial
• Bulk Retail (maximum 75% of land area dedicated to light industrial or bulk retail
outlets)
Sub -Area B (27.48 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR — East Logan (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Retail
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Light Industrial
• Bulk Retail (maximum 75% of land area dedicated to light industrial or bulk retail
outlets)
Sub -Area C (25.17 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR — West Logan (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Support Retail
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Light Industrial
HAEDNSP\Projects\Boeing Plant\Misc\Boeing proposed uses.docLast printed 01/06/2003 3:54 PM
BOEING — RENTON PLANT
PRELIlVIINARY PROPOSED USES
Page 2 of 2
Sub -Area D (23.43 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR - West Logan (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Support Retail
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Light Industrial
Sub -Area E (21.09 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR — West Logan (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Support Retail
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Light Industrial
Sub -Area F (103.59 acres) — Proposed Zoning: COR — Lakeside (new zoning
classification); Proposed Uses:
• Office
• Residential
• Retail (excluding bulk retail outlets)
• Higher Ed
• R&D
• Hotel
4
CITY OF RENTON
Proposed
Urban Center Comprehensive Plan Amendments
and Implementing Zoning Designations
with Allowable Uses
Urban Center Comprehensive Plan Designations_
Urban Center — Transition Comprehensive Plan Designation (UC-T)
Employment Area — Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation (EA -Ind)
Service Commercial Comprehensive Plan Designation (SC)
Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan Designation (RSF)
Urban Center Implementing Zonis and Representative Allowable Uses
Commercial/Office/Residential 3 Zone (COR — 3)
• Office
• Hotel
• Commercial
o Retail
o Restaurant
• Residential (apartments at 16-50 du/a)
• Public Access to Lake Washington and Coulon Park
Commercial/Office/Residential 4 Zone (COR — 4)
• Residential (high -density)
• Hotel
• Office
• Commercial
o Retail
o Restaurant
o On -site services
o Adult, child, and family day care
o Dance clubs and halls
o Movie theaters
• Schools
• Parks
• Conference Center
• Heavy Industrial (existing, no expansion)
• Laboratories: research, development, and testing
• Transportation related uses
o Vehicle rental, small
o Parking facilities
o Transit centers
HAWNSAProjectABoeing P1anWiscXUrban Center zoning (rev2).doc
PROPOSED CITY OF RENTON ALTERNATIVE
Urban Center Implementing Zoning and Representative Allowable Uses, con't
Page 2 of 4
• Public Facilities
o Public Access to Lake Washington and Cedar River
o Cultural facilities
o Utilities, small
o Wireless communication facilities
Commercial/Office/Residential 5 Zone (COR — 5)
• Residential
o Attached flats and townhouses
• Office
o General office
o Medical/dental offices
o Veterinary offices/clinics
o Government offices and facilities
• Hotel/motel
• Commercial
o Retail (including big box)
o On -site services
o Adult, child, and family day care
o Restaurant
o Dance clubs and halls
o Movie theaters
o Sports arenas, auditoriums
o Exhibition halls
o Recreation facilities (indoor and outdoor)
• Medical institutions
• Schools
• Parks
• Conference center
• Light Industrial (prohibited within two hundred feet of the Cedar River)
o Assembly and/or packaging operations
o Construction/contractor's office
o Laboratories: light manufacturing
o Laboratories: research, development, and testing
o Manufacturing and fabrication, light
• Public Facilities
o Public Access to Cedar River
o Cultural facilities
o Utilities, including electrical power generation and cogeneration
• Communications facilities
o Broadcast and relay towers
o Wireless communication facilities
• Transportation related uses
o Vehicle rental, small
PROPOSED CITY OF RENTON ALTERNATIVE
Urban Center Implementing Zoning and Representative Allowable Uses, con't
Page 3 of 4
o Parking facilities
o Transit centers
o Vehicle fueling stations
o Helipads
Commercial/Office/Residential 6 Zone (COR — 6)
• Residential
o Attached dwellings
o Retirement residences
• Office
o General office
o Medical/dental offices
o Veterinary offices/clinics
• Parks
• Commercial
o Retail
o Restaurant
o On -site services
• Communications facilities
o Broadcast and relay towers
o Wireless communication facilities
• Transportation related uses
o Transit centers
Heavy Industrial Zone M
• Manufacturing and assembly (existing)
Commercial Arterial Zone (CA)
• Commercial
o Retail, including big box
o Restaurant
o On -site services
o Adult and child day care
o Dance clubs and halls
o Movie Theaters
o Recreational facilities, indoor
• Office
o General office
o Medical/dental offices
o Veterinary offices/clinics
• Residential
o Attached dwelling
• Hotel/motel
• Schools
PROPOSED CITY OF RENTON ALTERNATIVE
Urban Center Implementing Zoning and Representative Allowable Uses, con't
Page 4 of 4
• Vehicle Services
o Vehicle rental, small
o Car washes
o Parking facilities
o Fueling stations
o Vehicle service and repair, small
• Light Industrial
o Laboratories: light manufacturing
o Laboratories: research, development, and testing
o Recycling collection station
o Utilities, small
o Wireless communication facilities
• Parks
Residential 8 Zone (R-8)
• Single family residential (9.7 du/a max density)
Residential 10 Zone (R-10)
• Single family residential (13 du/a max density)
• Multi -family residential (10 du/a max density)
PROPOSED LAND USE COMPARISON
SUBAREAS Alternative 1 Uses Alternative 2 Uses Alternatives 3 & 4 LAND USE AREAS Proposed Uses Potential Conflicts
(Boeing Proposed) (Existing zoning) (Partial Redevelopment) (Full Redevelopment) (City Proposed) (City Proposed)
COR 3 Office [This land is not owned
(Southport & Fry's) Hotel by Boeing or included
• Commercial in the Boeing proposed
Residential study area.]
Subarea A Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 4) Bulk retail
Light industrial (new)
Subarea B Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 5) Bulk retail
Light industrial (new)
Office/lab (existing)
Subarea C Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 5) Bulk retail
Light industrial (new)
Subarea D Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 5) Bulk retail
Subarea E Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 5) Bulk retail
Subarea F Heavy industrial
(corresponds to COR 4) Bulk retail
Mixed -use (new)*
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Light industrial
Office/lab (new)
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Light industrial
Office/lab (existing)
Office/lab (new)
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Heavy industrial
Bulk retail
Light industrial
Retail & bulk retail
Higher Ed
Office
Residential
R&D
Office
Light industrial
Retail and bulk retail
Higher Ed
Residential
R&D
Light industrial
Residential
Bulk retail
R&D
Office
Higher Ed
Light industrial
R&D
Support retail
Office
Residential
Higher Ed
Residential
Light industrial
Support retail
Office
R&D
Higher Ed
Off ice
Residential
Retail (excluding bulk)
R&D
Hotel
Higher Ed
COR 4
Includes Boeing Lot 3B
(corresponds to Boeing
Subareas A & F)
COR 5
(corresponds to Boeing
Subareas B, C, D & E)
Residential
Hotel
Office
Commercial
Schools
Conference center
Research & Devel
Transportation related
Public facilities
Residential
Office
Hotel/motel
Commercial
Medical institutions
Schools
Conference center
Light industrial
Public facilities
Communications facil.
Transportation related
COR 6 Residential
Office
Commercial
Communications facil.
Transportation related
Boeing .has not
included Boeing Lot 3B
in its study area.
Boeing has proposed
industrial uses and bulk
(big -box) retail in area
'A'
Boeing has proposed
industrial uses and bulk
(big -box) retail in areas
B,C,D&E.
City would not allow
industrial uses within
200' of Cedar River.
[This land not included in
Boeing's proposed
study area.]
Comparison matrix.xlsSheet1
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: _January 13, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Renton Mayor Jesse Tanner will discuss the City's accomplishments and future outlook in his 2003 State of the
City address during a Renton Chamber of Commerce luncheon on Wednesday, January 22 d. The event will be
held at the Holiday Inn Select -Renton, beginning at 11:36 a.m. The cost is $25 for pre -paid Chamber members
and $35 for all other attendees. To register for the luncheon, please call the Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce at 425-226-4560, or register online at www.renton-chamber.com. Registrations must be received
by Friday, January 17`h. Following the luncheon, the State of the City presentation will be available on the
City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us and will be featured on the City's Cable Channel 21 in early February.
• There is a new edition of.CityView running now. It features stories on the Renton Youth Symphony
Orchestra, Teen Activities, the Memorial Park Groundbreaking, Running Start, the Fire Department training on
the defibrillator, School Resource Officers, and results from the city survey.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• The Recreation division of Community Services has received a grant of $3,000 from the King County
Performing Arts Network for performances at Carco Theater for the 2003 season.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• The first Neighbor -to -Neighbor Networking Meeting was held. Saturday, January 11a'. Forty-one attendees,
representing seventeen different neighborhoods, participated in the event, sharing information, ideas, and
enthusiasm. Round table topic discussions covered meetings, organization structure, communication, and
grant ideas. City staff volunteer liaisons were instrumental in helping to make this a successful event.
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
• The public works Transportation Operations Maintenance Shops has completed the work to add the left turn
movement from Park Avenue North to Garden Avenue North. The signal is now in operation to allow this
westbound left turn. This will provide an important access point for the Fry's Electronics store and other
developments in this vicinity.
• Gregg Zimmerman has agreed to the offer by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission to
serve as a panelist on the upcoming Pipeline Communications Public Meeting to be held at Bellevue
Community College between 9:00 a.m. and 7 p.m. on January 29`h. This meeting has been set up by the
Federal Office of Pipeline Safety to provide a means for the public to learn about hazardous liquid pipeline
Adm9nistrative Report
January 13, 2003
Page 2
safety requirements. Gregg Zimmerman's panel will address pipeline integrity management communications
with the public.
The Sound Transit Board approved Motion #M2003-01 on January 9'. This motion provides for the
reprogramming of $21.2 million to support expanded service and purchase of additional buses for the Sound
Transit Express Regional bus program. This funding is needed if there is to be a third route to Renton
(Bellevue -Renton -Puyallup) as promised in Sound Move (note, an earlier letter from Sound Transit Executive
Director Joni Earl committed to the implementation of a third route in Renton by September 2003). City staff
continues to work with Sound Transit staff in order to achieve implementation of this route. The Board's
funding decision is an important step in these efforts.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
• During the week of January 14-20, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following
areas:
Date
Area
Emphasis
Tuesday, January 14
500 block, Williams Ave S
Speed/radar trailer
Wednesday, January 15
Grady Way S at Talbot Road S
Red light
Thursday, January 16
500 block, Williams Ave S
Speed/radar trailer
Friday, January 17
3500-3800 block, Lake Washington Blvd
Seed
Monday, January20
1100 block, Carr Road
Seed
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and
Strategic Planning
Staff contact...... Alex Pietsch, x6592
Subject:
Renton Lodging Tax Committee Membership
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Al N:
For Agenda of:
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance...........
Resolution...........
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
January 13, 2003
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Resolution #3288 established the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee and authorizes Council to
review the membership annually and fill any committee vacancies. Terry Godat of the Travelers Inn has
been nominated by the Renton Lodging Association to fill the position vacated by Howard Cohen,
formerly of the Holiday Inn Select.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Renton City Council approve the annual membership of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee. The following individuals will serve on the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for the
coming year:
• Rick Meinig, general manager, Silver Cloud Inn
• Terry Godat, general manager, Travelers Inn
• Suzette Cooke, president, Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
• Julie Brewer, community relation manager, City of Renton
• King Parker, Renton City Councilmember.
\\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Economic Development\Hotel-Motel Tax\Council Action - Agenda Bills and Issue Papers\agbill- committee
vacancies 1-03.doc/
r
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 23, 2002
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:-- ( Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator, x 6592
SUBJECT: Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Membership
ISSUE:
Filling the current vacancy on the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
BACKGROUND:
During the 1997 Legislative session, the Washington State Legislature passed SSB 5867 which
allows the City of Renton to impose an increase in the hotel/motel tax of up to 1 % for the
purposes of increasing tourism. On October 13, 1997 the City Council passed Resolution #3288
establishing a Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
The City of Renton's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee consists of five members. Two of these
members are from the lodging industry; two are involved in activities authorized for funding by
revenue received from the tax; and a member of the City Council to serve as chair. The City
Council reviews the membership of this Advisory Committee on an annual basis and makes
changes as appropriate. Vacancies on the committee are filled by the City Council.
Currently there is one vacancy on the Advisory Committee. Howard Cohen has left the Holiday
Inn Select and is no longer employed in the City of Renton. The Renton Lodging Association has
recommended that Terry Godat, general manager of the Travelers Inn, fill this position. The
Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee met December 23, 2002 and concurred with this
recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council appoint Terry Godat to the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for a
term of one year.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
�BMITTING DATA:
Dept/DivBoard.... Economic Development
Staff Contact ........ Alex Pietsch x6592
SUBJECT:
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Funding Recommendation for
Renton Lodging
Association
EXHIBITS:
Issue Paper
Renton Lodging Association 2003 Marketing Campaign
and Budget
Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee Report
Contract with The Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
Al11 #: .L
FOR AGENDA OF: January 13, 2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ................. X
Public Hearing.....
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business.........
New Business.......
Study Session........
Other .....................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept............
- Finance Dept........
Other.....................
'SCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required .... $ 80,000 Transfer/Amendment.... $80,000 Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
Amount Budgeted .......... $80,000 Revenue Generated ........ 0-
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City Council approve the Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee recommendation to allocate $80,000 of Hotel/Motel
Tax collections to the Renton Lodging Association for its 2003 tourism marketing efforts
In addition, the Administration recommends that Council authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with the Greater
Renton Chamber of Commerce for Year Four of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional effort.
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 2002
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator (x 6592) W�l
SUBJECT: Renton Lodging Association Funding
Issue:
• The Renton Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee has recommended to the Renton City
Council allocation of Hotel/Motel Tax revenues for use by the Renton Lodging Association for
tourism promotion.
Recommendations:
Recognize the successes of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional efforts and
fund the program's fourth full year of operation by allocating $80,000 in Hotel/Motel Tax
collections to that end. The contract will also include a remaining fund balance from the
Association's 2001 campaign.
Background:
In 1999, the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce received Hotel/Motel Tax revenues for
promotion of tourism -related activities in Renton. The Renton Lodging Association was born out of
this effort and 2003 will be the group's fourth year of operation. As a committee of the Chamber of
Commerce, its membership is made up of 10 Renton hotels. By partnering together and pooling
resources through this promotional effort, the Association has been able to enjoy additional
successes. The Renton Lodging Association has put together successful promotional events by
targeting IKEA shoppers who come to Renton from the Portland -area, encouraging Eastern
Washington residents coming over for Seattle Mariner and Seahawk games and corporate
representatives that book hotel rooms for their clients and employees. This effort continues to grow
and should become even more successful.
A complete summary of the 2003 Renton Lodging Association tourism promotion campaign is
attached.
The Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee met December 23, 2002 and recommends that the City
Council authorize the allocation of $80,000 of lodging tax revenue to the Renton Lodging
Association for its 2003 tourism marketing efforts.
Attachments: Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee report
Renton Lodging Association 2003 Marketing Campaign and budget
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
Renton Lodging Association
2003 Marketing Campaign
Campaign Goals
Create and implement a marketing campaign for the Renton Lodging Association (RLA)
designed to accomplish the following goals:
Increase occupancy at Renton hotels and motels (and increase hotel/motel tax income).
2. Promote business, group and leisure travel opportunities in Renton.
3. Promote Renton as a place for corporate meetings and events.
The campaign will be funded by the Renton Hotel/Motel Tax funds and leveraged through the
participation of the industry.
2003 Campaign Initiatives
1. Continue monthly meetings of the RLA. Support continuation of tourism infrastructure.
2. Expand connections and visibility of Renton's visitor industry within the local market.
Keep business in Renton.
3. Create marketing partnerships and tourism packages to attract visitors and promote
spending in Renton.
4. Promote weekend, off-peak tourism opportunities to the casual traveler.
5. Seek opportunities to capture group tour business.
6. Work with Washington State associations to attract business travelers and meetings to
Renton. Target both public and private sector travelers.
2003 Renton Lodging Association Marketing Campaign
7. Promote and market all meeting/event space in Renton.
8. Continue membership and partnership programs.
Key 2003 Campaign Messages
1. Renton offers a central location
- SeaTac International Airport
- Bellevue, Downtown Seattle, high-tech corridor
- Freeways
- Mountains
- Attractions
2. Renton offers less hassle
- Highway connections
- Central location
- No bridges
- Free parking
- Great access for tour buses
3. Renton offers a wide selection of properties
- Great services and range of amenities
- Variety of properties
4. Renton offers a great value
- All the amenities and services without the big city prices
- Friendly staff
5. Renton is a great place for families and the leisure traveler
- Play more, pay less
- Central location
- Lots of amenities
6. Renton has what business meeting planners want
- Variety of space (in hotels and in other Renton facilities)
- Variety of activities for after events, spouses, etc.
2003 Campaign Strategies
I. Continue monthly meetings of the RLA. Support continuation of tourism
infrastructure.
A. Continue operation of 1-877-GoRenton phone number.
B. Update website to promote Renton and its hotels
2003 Renton Lodging Association Marketing Campaign 2
C. Provide support to Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce to handle visitor
inquiries. Continue development of visitor information center at Chamber.
D. Print additional copies of visitor brochure.
II. Expand connections and visibility of Renton's visitor industry within the local market.
Keep business in Renton.
A. Make presentations to key organizations about the RLA and opportunities in
Renton. Encourage adoption of policies to keep business in Renton.
1. Renton City Council
2. Renton School Board
3. Renton Technical College Board
4. Valley Medical Center Board
5. Renton Rotary
6. Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
B. Determine list of key decision makers within stakeholders (i.e. City Parks
Department, IKEA Performing Arts Center Director, director sports or music at
the school district, etc.). Meet with these decision makers to develop strategies to
capture more travel business.
C. Seek opportunities to place articles or advertisements in stakeholder newsletters
about visitor and travel opportunities in Renton.
D. Consider the development of additional signage on the Chamber building that
highlights the availability of visitor information services.
E. Encourage the City of Renton to create and place directional signs to the
Chamber/Visitor Information Center from key access points to Renton.
lII. Create marketing partnerships and tourism packages to attract visitors and promote
spending in Renton.
A. Hold packaging meeting with Renton restaurants, retailers and attractions to
discuss and develop "Stay and Play" packages and promotions —joint advertising,
mailings, coupons, brochures, etc.
B. Work with IKEA to develop co -promotions.
C. Work with targeted area attractions (Newcastle Golf Course, Emerald Downs,
Museum of Flight, etc.) to create packages and promotions.
D. Update hotel concierge books.
2003 Renton Lodging Association Marketing Campaign
IV. Promote weekend, off-peak tourism opportunities to the casual traveler. DRAFT
Tactics:
A. Continue radio advertising campaign during Seattle Mariner broadcasts in Eastern
Washington and Portland, Oregon markets.
B. Place advertising in AAA of Washington and AAA of British Columbia.
C. Place advertising in Alaska and Horizon Airlines Magazines.
V. Seek opportunities to capture group tour business. DRAFT Tactics:
A. Receive designation as a Destination Marketing Organization.
B. Join Washington State Group Tour Task Force.
C. Create marketing one -sheet about Renton's opportunities.
D. Join and participate in NTA to reach tour operators.
E. Participate in trade shows that reach group tour operators.
VI. Work with Washington State associations to attract business travelers and meetings to
Renton. Target both public and private sector travelers.
A. Hold FAM Tours throughout the course of the year.
B. Meet with Washington Society of Association Directors, Inland Northwest
Business Travelers and other associations to promote Renton and create marketing
opportunities.
C. Place advertising or create other partnership programs that these associations.
VII. Promote and market all meeting/event space in Renton.
A. Hold meeting with area facility managers (Valley Medical, Renton Technical
College, Carco Theatre, etc.) to discuss and develop joint marketing programs.
B. Update inventory of available public and private sector meeting spaces in Renton.
Produce meeting planner handout sheet.
VEIL Continue membership and partnership programs.
A. Continue to nurture partnership with Lindbergh High School Travel and Tourism
program.
2003 Renton Lodging Association Marketing Campaign
B. Continue membership with Seattle King County Visitor and Convention Bureau.
C. Continue memberships with Washington State Lodging Association.
IX. Begin development of future organizational model for the Renton Lodging Association.
Key issues to discuss include:
A. Should the organization evolve into a convention and visitor bureau model?
B. Should the organization have a staff person dedicated to attracting meetings and
events to Renton?
C. Should the organization offer membership/participation by other businesses and
organizations who benefit from visitor industry (Dinner Train, Newcastle Golf,
Downtown restaurants, etc.)
2003 Renton Lodging Association Marketing Campaign
I' ive
Tactic
Projected Budget
Notes
Travel Publications
AAA Journey Magazine
$ 5,200.00
1x per year
Print Partnerships
Horizon/Alaska Air Magazine
$ 12,800.00
$ 5,000.00
2x per year
Direct mail catalogue
inserts
IKEA - Shopping promotion
Stay and Play Packages - Dinner Train, SuperMall,
Newcastle, Emerald Downs, Casinos, Travel Agents
$ 5,000.00
Direct mail inserts
Radio Advertising
Other Partnership/Packaging Opportunities
Mariner Broadcasts (May - August): Portland,
Wenatchee, Yakima, Moses Lake
$ 1,000.00
$ 20,000.00
Tool Kit
Fulfillment Brochure
$ 7,500.00
Update
Tour group, meeting planner handout sheets
$ 1,000.00
Website update
$ 2,500.00
FAM Tour: employees of Renton properties
$ 750.00
FAM Tour: tour operators
$ 750.00
FAM Tour: companies/travel departments
$ 750.00
wz
._
Membership
Tour Operators
Develop and create marketing tactics to promote
Renton to group tour operators serving the greater
Seattle market.
Seattle King County Convention & Visitors Bureau
$ 4,000.00
$ 500.00
Partnerships
Washington State Lodging Association
$ 350.00
Membership
Lindbergh High School Travel & Tourism Program
$ 500.00
Sponsorship of program
NTA Membership
$ 1,000.00
Membership
Visitor Information
Administration
Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce - ideas to
explore include fulfillment of information requests,
display racks, maps, "things to do" sheet, presentation
boards, computer work station, building signage and
other information collaterals
Hamilton/Saunderson
$ 2,500.00
$ 18,000.00
Administration and
coordination
Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
$ 2,000.00
Administration and
fulfillment
Design/Production
$ 2,000.00
Postage/Copy/Printing/1-877 Phone Service
$ 2,500.00
Total Projected Expenses
103
Contingency
w
$ 2,500.00
$ 98,100.00
Income
Hotel/Motel Tax
$ 80,000.00
2002 Carry Forward
$ 18,273.00
Total
$ 98,273.00
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
December 23, 2002
Community Marketing Campaign and Renton Lodging Association
2003 Funding Recommendation
The Renton Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee recommends to the Renton City Council allocation
of $130,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections as follows:
• $20,000 to the Renton Community Marketing Campaign for year five of its community marketing
efforts;
• $30,000 to proposed Barbecue and Blues Festival to be held in Downtown Renton in September
2003; and
$80,000 to the Renton Lodging Association, a committee of the Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce, for its fourth year of tourism promotional activities.
C0,2-
King ar, er, Chair
cc: Jesse Tanner
Renton City Council
Alex Pietsch
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AND THE GREATER RENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day of , 2003 by and
between the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal code city, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and The Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, a Washington Non-profit
Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Consultant", for the mutual benefits to be derived,
hereby agree as follows:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City has determined to contract with Consultant to provide certain
professional services as more fully set forth herein, and
WHEREAS, Consultant has the expertise to provide said services, and
WHEREAS, Consultant is not to be paid any benefits other than the consideration
stated below, and
WHEREAS, both parties desire to establish and delineate the conditions of said
employment and in consideration of the mutual covenant contained herein, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
Compensation. The City hereby agrees to contract with Consultant, and
Consultant hereby agrees to accept said contract in accordance with the terms
and provisions of this Agreement and Exhibit hereto as hereinafter set forth.
The Consultant shall be compensated $98,100 for the duties rendered to the
City in the Amounts set forth in the attached scope of work. Payment shall be
made for work satisfactorily performed in conformance with the scope of work
set forth herein. The Consultant will provide monthly progress reports and
payments will be made on a percentage of work completed basis.
2. Terms of Contract: The Consultant's contract shall commence effective on
February 1, 2003 and shall continue to January 30, 2004, unless terminated in
the manner provided hereinafter in this agreement.
3. Independent Contractor. The parties intend that an independent consultant
relationship exist between the Consultant and the City. The Consultant waives
all claims to any benefits available to City employees including, but not limited
to, retirement, disability, unemployment, vacation and sick leave. Consultant
acknowledges and assumes responsibility for all self-employment taxes,
licenses and permits.
Agreement with the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
Page 2
4. Duties. The Consultant shall perform all the duties as set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full,
and such other duties as may be assigned from time to time, within the scope of
the contract, by the Economic Development Director, City of Renton.
5. Termination. This Agreement is subject to termination for any reason by either
party with at least 14 days written notice prior to the effective date of the
termination to the other party at the following addresses:
CITY
Economic Development Director
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
CONSULTANT
The Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce
300 Rainier Avenue N.
Renton, WA 98055
(425) 226-4560
6. Insurance and Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold harmless the City from liability, cost and attorney's fees due to personal
injuries and property damage arising from the acts or omissions of Consultant.
This indemnity shall not apply in the event the personal injury or property
damage is due to the sole negligence of the City. Consultant shall obtain, and
keep in force, general commercial liability insurance in the amount of at least
$1,000,000 for personal injury and property damage per occurrence during the
term of this agreement. The City of Renton shall be named as an additional
insured. This clause shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall
continue to be in effect for any claims or causes of action arising hereunder.
7. General Provisions.
a. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and
both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements oral or
otherwise that have not been fully set forth in the test of this Agreement.
b. The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be amended
or modified without the written concurrence of both parties.
c. If any provisions or portion of this Agreement are held to be
unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the City shall have the right, at its
option, to declare the Agreement void and enter into negotiations with the
Consultant for execution of a new professional services agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed
and executed this day of , 2002.
CITY OF RENTON
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
CONSULTANT
Consultant
Agreement with the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce
Page 3
ATTEST:
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
0
City Attorney
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
BMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.... Economic Development
Staff Contact ........ Alex Pietsch x6592
SUBJECT:
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Funding Recommendation for
the Renton Community Marketing Campaign
EXHIBITS:
Issue Paper
Renton Community Marketing Campaign 2003 Action Plan
Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee Report
Contract with Hamilton/Saunderson
Al11 #:
FOR AGENDA OF: January 13, 2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ................. X
Public Hearing.....
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business.........
New Business.......
Study Session........
Other .....................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept............
Finance Dept........
Other .....................
—SCALIMPACT:
Expenditure Required .... $ 50,000
Amount Budgeted .......... $ 50,000
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Transfer/Amendment.... $50,000 Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
Revenue Generated ........ 0-
Authorize the Mayor to sign contracts with Hamilton/Saunderson, marketing consultants, for a fifth year of the Renton Community
Marketing Campaign.
Partner with other key community stakeholders for a fourth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign by allocating
$20,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections to its use. This allocation will be leveraged with additional financial contributions from
the Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning's "business recruitment" budget and other
community agencies, organizations and businesses.
Allocate an additional $30,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections directly to the proposed Renton Barbecue & Blues Festival to be
held in downtown Renton in September 2003.
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 23, 2002
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator (x 6592) ta',-T
SUBJECT: Renton Community Marketing Campaign
Issue:
• The Renton Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee has recommended that the Renton City
Council allocate funds for activities proposed by the Renton Community Marketing Campaign.
Recommendations:
• Authorize the Mayor to sign contracts with Hamilton/Saunderson, marketing consultants, for a
fifth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign.
• Partner with other key community stakeholders for a fourth year of the Renton Community
Marketing Campaign by allocating $20,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections to its use. This
allocation will be leveraged with additional financial contributions from the Department of
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning's "business recruitment" budget
and other community agencies, organizations and businesses.
• Allocate an additional $30,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections directly to the proposed Renton
Barbecue & Blues Festival to be held in downtown Renton in September 2003.
Background:
In 1998, the Renton City Council authorized the City's participation in the Renton Community
Marketing Campaign in conjunction with other key community stakeholders. The goal was to
leverage marketing dollars in the community, by collectively promoting Renton as an outstanding
place to work, live, learn, shop, visit and have fun. Stakeholders, in addition to the City, include: the
Renton School District, Renton Technical College, Valley Medical Center, the Greater Renton
Chamber of Commerce and the Renton hotel industry.
The Renton Community Marketing Campaign goals tie directly to the City's Business Plan
objectives and focus on promoting a consistent identity that builds on the appeal of Renton's
residential, educational and business opportunities. The first three years of the campaign have been
a tremendous success in both the Renton community and the Greater Puget Sound Region. Our
branding slogan: "Renton. Ahead of the Curve," and using "We Chose Renton" testimonials to
convey our message have been effective. In its fourth year, the Campaign will carry on this theme
with advertisements speaking to why Renton is "The Right Choice" for business, education,
January 21, 2002
Page 2
healthcare, tourism, etc. The bottom line: people are choosing Renton as a great location to open or
relocate a business, buy a house and educate young children.
Stakeholders have overwhelmingly agreed that this kind of comprehensive community effort has
been very successful. They have all committed to participate in a continuation of the Renton
Community Marketing Campaign.
The Campaign's proposed activities are described in the attached 2003 Renton Community
Marketing Campaign Action Plan.
The Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee met December 23, 2002 and recommends that the City
Council authorize the allocation of $20,000 of lodging tax revenue to the Community Marketing
Campaign for Year Five of its community marketing efforts and events and an additional $30,000
directly to the proposed Barbecue and Blues Festival to be held in downtown Renton in September
2003.
Attachments: Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee report
Renton 2003 Marketing Action Plan
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
Thinking Big: Delivering on the Promise
Renton 2003 Marketing Action Plan
In the past four years Renton has promised a lot.
➢ Renton promised new schools with new technologies. Renton delivered.
➢ Renton promised a new technology center. Renton delivered.
➢ Renton promised a new performing arts center. Renton delivered.
➢ Renton promised a new downtown with piazza, pavilion, transit center, housing, restaurants,
Farmer's Market, and other amenities. Renton delivered.
➢ Renton promised new businesses, such as Fry's Electronics, and attractions such as Cirque
du Soleil. Renton delivered.
➢ Renton promised that it was ahead of the curve. Renton delivered.
During the past four years, Renton has built the buzz. It has found an audience. And the
audience knows that Renton is ahead of the curve.
Renton has delivered on its promises to the community and people throughout Puget Sound. In
2003, Renton will celebrate the fruits of its investments with the completion of a variety of
significant community projects. In addition, Renton will roll out a series of exciting new
initiatives to help position the community for the new century.
The 2003 Renton Community Marketing Campaign will take advantage of this success and
celebrate the past, present and future of Renton.
Marketing Campaign Objectives
1. Celebrate Renton's public and private sector accomplishments during the past five years
— delivering on the promise.
2. Enroll the Renton community in taking pride in Renton and its accomplishments.
3. Continue to promote and enhance the image of Renton in the community and region.
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign
4. Encourage people in the Puget Sound region to consider Renton as a place to live,
work, do business, learn and play.
5. Showcase Renton's stakeholders.
6. Creatively leverage and market Renton's assets and amenities.
Focus of 2003 Marketing Campaign
1. Build on the success and momentum of the campaign by telling the story of Renton and
its accomplishments over the past five years. 2003 marks the completion of a variety of
key public and private sector development projects. Renton has promised a lot and it
has delivered. It has made the right choices. 2003 will be a year of celebration and an
opportunity to showcase the future of Renton. Here is just a partial list of what Renton
will deliver in 2003:
Community: IKEA Performing Arts Center and Veteran's Memorial Park
City: Downtown parking garage, pavilion building, and pool
Renton School District: New school buildings and investment in technologies
Renton Technical College: Renton Technology Center
Valley Medical Center: New investment in services
Business: Fry's Electronics, groundbreaking for Sam's Club and others
2. Continue to define Renton's competitive advantages and niche in the Puget Sound
marketplace and why it continues to be the right choice for business, health care,
education, tourism and living. This message will be incorporated into the celebrations of
milestones and the key events during 2003.
3. Through celebrations, new events and other promotions, bring people to discover
Renton.
4. Use community marketing initiatives to support economic development strategies.
Tactics will be created to roll out new initiatives and community opportunities.
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign 2
2003 Campaign Strategies: An Ahead of the Curve Celebration
To celebrate Renton's success, the following core strategies are proposed:
Create a dynamic and exciting five -month campaign of special events and advertising
programs from May through September.
2. Develop and support with advertising a Renton "Progress Report" to be published in the
Renton Reporter.
3. Build on past initiatives by providing updates to the Renton Market. corn website.
4. Take advantage of unique marketing partnerships, such as the 2002 Cirque du Soleil
event, during the course of the year.
Initiative I: The Ahead of the Curve Celebration
This initiative will create a dynamic and exciting five -month campaign of special events and
advertising programs from May through September. These celebrations will be designed to
accomplish the following goals:
1. Through dynamic and innovative programming and decorations, create a "knock your
socks off series of awesome events" that will wow attendees and attract regional
publicity.
2. Through interactive, imaginative and invigorating programming, celebrate the past,
present and future of Renton.
3. Through packaging with other community celebrations, create a spectacular "Grand
Opening" celebration.
4. Through exciting and diverse programming attract audiences and publicity from June
through September.
5. Through media and corporate partnerships, highly leverage marketing resources.
6. Through quality and successful programming, create annual programs and new
traditions for Renton.
Celebration Elements
I. Ahead of the Curve Festival, June 5 - 7
II. Cinema at the Piazza Festival, Fridays for 8 weeks during July and August
III. Renton BBQ, Blues and Brew Fest, September 12 —14
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign
Ahead of the Curve Festival
June 5 — 7: Festival Elements
Thursday, June 5 Business Excellence Awards(organized and hosted by Greater Renton
Chamber of Commerce)
Friday, June 6 VIP Opening for IKEA Performing Arts Center (organized and hosted by
Renton Community Foundation and RSD)
Saturday, June 7 Dedication of the Pavilion and Downtown Parking Garage
Ahead of the Curve Entertainment Stage:
- Featuring Regional Performers
Opening of the Renton Pavilion
Tours of IKEA Performing Arts Center
All under the canopy of magical Transformit architectural fabrics
Tuesday, June 10 Opening of Downtown Renton Farmer's Market
Target Audience: Renton Residents
Secondary Audience: Regional Residents
Saturday, June 7, Proposed Programming
11 a.m. Dedication of the Pavilion and Downtown Parking Garage
- a gigantic ribbon will be wrapped around the Downtown Pavilion and
Parking Garage
- ribbon cutting ceremony with Mayor, City Official, Governor, etc.
- serve free cake and coffee for 1,000 people
- fire confetti cannons to provide a spectacular, visual effect
11:30 a.m. — 6 p.m. Opening of Renton Pavilion
- displays of the past, present and future of Renton
- Past: historical
- Present: stakeholders, city departments, community organizations,
businesses
- Future: the Boeing site, the Highlands, etc.
Noon — 6 p.m. Ahead of the Curve Entertainment Stage, Downtown Piazza
Kids: Tim Noah
Community: Renton Community Band
Attraction: Junior Cadillac
Attraction: The Kingsmen
(NOTE: Attractions could change with radio partner)
Other Activities Tours of IKEA Performing Arts Center
Tours of Downtown apartments and condominiums
Concerts and programs in Downtown restaurants and retail stores
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign 4
Proposed Budget:
Ahead of the Curve
Celebration
Expenses
Revenue
Opening Ceremony
$8,000
Marketing Campaign
$62,000
Renton Pavilion
$2,500
Farmers Market
$ 5,000
Entertainment Stage
$25,000
Corporate Sponsors
$20,000
Transformits
$11,000
Pavilion Display
$5,000
Rentals
Advertising
$15,000
Total
$92,000
Collateral Materials
$1,000
Logistics (Set Up/Clean
$5,000
Projected
$0
Up/Security)
Profit
(Defecit)
Production
$19,500
Contingency
$5,000
Total
$92,000
Summer in the City
This initiative will build on the success of the summer activities planned for Renton:
Tuesdays: Farmer's Market
Wednesdays: Concerts at Coulon
Fridays: Cinema at the Piazza
Cinema at the Piazza, 9 —11 p.m., July 12 — August 30
The eight week long series would feature free outdoor movies at the Piazza. The event would
be promoted as a "dinner and a movie." This would offer the opportunity for Downtown
Restaurants to participate. The series would be promoted through a radio partnership and print
advertising.
Target Audience: Renton residents and people who work in Renton
Secondary Audience: Regional Residents
Proposed Budget:
Summer Cinema
Expenses
Screen/Projection/Film Rental
Posters/Flyers
Advertising
Revenue
$40,000 Marketing Campaign $30,000
$1,000 City (Farmer's Market) $15,000
$10,000 Cinema Corporate $25,000
Partners
Production/Event Staffing $5,000
Logistics $12,000
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign
Total $70,000
Contingency
Total
Renton Barbeque Festival
September 12 - 14, 2003
$1,000
$69,000
Projected
Profit
(Defecit)
$1,000
In September, the finest barbeque cookers from around the United States would compete in
Renton for the People's Choice and Pacific Northwest BBQ Championships during this three-
day celebration. The festival would fill the streets of Downtown Renton with the sweet smell
and tastes of ribs that would be served with the hottest blues around. (The festival is timed to
take advantage of the competition tour. Cook offs take place in Reno on Labor Day weekend,
followed by a large cook off in Portland, Oregon). The budget would be highly leveraged
through sponsorships and corporate partnerships.
Key Elements
I. 20 Barbeque Booths
- South 3rd Street between Logan and Burnett. Burnett Avenue South from south side
of Transit Center to South 4' Street
II. Ahead of the Curve Entertainment Stages:
- national blue artists such as Robert Cray and Buddy Guy
- local blues artists
III. , BBQ Stage
- food commission presentations
- cooking demonstrations
celebrity chefs
IV. Renton Pavilion
- beer garden
V. Vendor Booths
- food commissions
- bbq and bbq supplies
- cooking equipment
Target Audience: Regional Residents
Secondary Audience:
Proposed Budget:
BBQ Cookoff
Expenses
Main Stage
BBQ Stage
Northwest Residents
$50,000
$20,000
Revenue
Hotel/Motel Tax
Title Sponsor
Food Commissions
$30,000
$50,000
$25,000
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign 6
Prize Money for Cookers
$20,000
Entertainment Stage
$25,000
Sponsor
Logistics
$25,000
BBQ Stage Sponsor
$15,000
Signage/Banners
$5,000
Beer Garden
$25,000
Beer Garden
$5,000
Display Booths
$25,000
Security
$7,500
Entry Fees
$40,000
Advertising
$30,000
10% of Gross Food
$20,000
Sales
Logistics
$15,000
Production
$30,000
10% of Beer Sales
$2,500
Contingency
$15,000
Total
$257,500
Total
$222,500
Projected
$35,000
Profit
(Defecit)
Profit resulting from this event would be split between Hamilton/Saunderson (25%) and a local
charity, such as the Renton Community Foundation (75%).
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign 7
Initiative II: Progress Report
This initiative will create an advertisement to support the creation of a special supplement in
early January 2003 to tell the story of how Renton has delivered on its promises. Celebrate
milestones that are planned for 2003. An overprint will be used for speaker's bureau activities
and direct mail to opinion leaders.
Projected Advertising and Design Budget: $ 2,000
Initiative III: Other Initiatives
This initiative will take advantage of marketing opportunities or provide support to the Ahead of
the Curve celebrations. In addition, costs related to copying and postage would be spent to
support all marketing initiatives.
Projected Marketing Opportunities Budget: $ 6,000
DRAFT 2003 Renton Marketing Campaign 8
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
December 23, 2002
Community Marketing Campaign and Renton Lodging Association
2003 Funding Recommendation
The Renton Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee recommends to the Renton City Council allocation
of $130,000 of Hotel/Motel Tax collections as follows:
• $20,000 to the Renton Community Marketing Campaign for year five of its community marketing
efforts;
• $30,000 to proposed Barbecue and Blues Festival to be held in Downtown Renton in September
2003; and
• $80,000 to the Renton Lodging Association, a committee of the Greater Renton Chamber of
Commerce, for its fourth year of tourism promotional activities.
King ar er, Chair
cc: Jesse Tanner
Renton City Council
Alex Pietsch
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AND HAMILTON/SAUNDERSON MARKETING PARTNERSHIP
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day of , 2003 by and
between the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal code city, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and The Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership, a Washington Corporation
hereinafter referred to as "Consultant", for the mutual benefits to be derived, hereby agree
as follows:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City has determined to contract with Consultant to provide certain
professional services as more fully set forth herein, and
WHEREAS, Consultant has the expertise to provide said services, and
WHEREAS, Consultant is not to be paid any benefits other than the consideration
stated below, and
WHEREAS, both parties desire to establish and delineate the conditions of said
employment and in consideration of the mutual covenant contained herein., the parties
hereby agree as follows:
Compensation. The City hereby agrees to contract with Consultant, and
Consultant hereby agrees to accept said contract in accordance with the terms
and provisions of this Agreement and Exhibit hereto as hereinafter set forth.
The Consultant shall be compensated $85,000 for the duties rendered to the
City in the Amounts set forth in the attached scope of work. The Consultant
shall be compensated an additional $306,500 contingent upon funding from key
community stakeholders and private sponsorships and partnerships. Additional
Payments may be made for work satisfactorily performed in conformance with
the scope of work set forth herein. The Consultant will provide monthly progress
reports and payments will be made on a percentage of work completed basis.
2. Terms of Contract: The Consultant's contract shall commence effective on
January 1, 2003 and shall continue to December 31, 2003, unless terminated in
the manner provided hereinafter in this agreement.
3. Independent Contractor. The parties intend that an independent consultant
relationship exist between the Consultant and the City. The Consultant waives
all claims to any benefits available to City employees including, but not limited
to, retirement, disability, unemployment, vacation and sick leave. Consultant
Agreement with the Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership
Page 2
acknowledges and assumes responsibility for all self-employment taxes,
licenses and permits.
4. Duties. The Consultant shall perform all the duties as set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full,
and such other duties as may be assigned from time to time, within the scope of
the contract, by the Economic Development Director, City of Renton.
5. Termination. This Agreement is subject to termination for any reason by either
party with at least 14 days written notice prior to the effective date of the
termination to the other party at the following addresses:
CITY CONSULTANT
Economic Development Director Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnershp
City of Renton 621 Fifth Avenue North, Suite A
1055 South Grady Way Seattle, WA 98109
Renton, WA 98055 (206) 282-6858
6. Insurance and Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold harmless the City from liability, cost and attorney's fees due to personal
injuries and property damage arising from the acts or omissions of Consultant.
This indemnity shall not apply in the event the personal injury or property
damage is due to the sole negligence of the City. Consultant shall obtain, and
keep in force, general commercial liability insurance in the amount of at least
$1,000,000 for personal injury and property damage per occurrence during the
term of this agreement. The City of Renton shall be named as an additional
insured. This clause shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall
continue to be in effect for any claims or causes of action arising hereunder.
7. General Provisions.
a. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and
both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements oral or
otherwise that have not been fully set forth in the test of this Agreement.
b. The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be amended
or modified without the written concurrence of both parties.
c. If any provisions or portion of this Agreement are held to be
unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the City shall have the right, at its
option, to declare the Agreement void and enter into negotiations with the
Consultant for execution of a new professional services agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed
and executed this day of , 2002.
CITY OF RENTON
la
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
CONSULTANT
Hamilton/Saunderson
Agreement with the Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership
Page 3
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
City Attorney
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: January 13, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (X6581)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Falk Annexation Election Resolution and Prezoning
Correspondence..
Public Hearing on January 27, 2003
Ordinance .............
Resolution.......... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
• Issue Paper
• Resolution
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Transfer/Amendment...... .
Required... N/A
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Council referred the request for a Falk annexation election to the Administration on
November 18, 2002. Because the site will need to be prezoned prior to coming into the City
and two public hearings are required for the prezone, we have an opportunity to combine the
presentation on the annexation with the first public hearing on the future City zoning for the
property. The requested action is to initiate this process by setting a public hearing date.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set the date of January 27, 2003 for a presentation of the proposed Falk Annexation and
consideration of a resolution authorizing an annexation election for the site.
• Council also set the first of two required public hearings on the prezoning for this site on this same
date.
\\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers -Agenda Bills-Ctte Reports\2002\AGENDA BILL-Tydico Site Annexation Resolution.doc/
CITE' OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 2002
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
City Council Members
VIA: k Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator
Economic Development, Neighborhoods,
& Strategic Planning Department
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581)
SUBJECT: Falk Annexation Resolution and Public Hearing on Prezoning
ISSUE: .
Should the Council support and initiate an election annexation for the 6.43-acre proposed Falk
Annexation?
• Should property owners within the Falk Annexation be asked to assume their fair share of the
City's bonded indebtedness?
• Should the Falk Annexation area, excluding public right-of-ways, be pre -zoned R-8 Zone?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election to consider the annexation of the Falk
and Gustafson properties and abutting 102" d Avenue SE right-of-way to the City:
✓ Condition acceptance of the annexation on property owners within the annexation area
assuming their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness.
✓ Require that the applicant reimburse the City for all King County costs associated with
holding the election that are paid by the City.
• Support prezoning the Falk Annexation site to R-8, Residential Single Family, 8 du/net acre.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The current proposed annexation was part of a larger (13.66-acre) annexation by the same name
earlier this year. On March 4th, Council considered the 10% Notice of Intent for this annexation at
a public meeting. On March 14th, the Washington State Supreme Court invalidated the "Property
Owner Petition Method" of annexation finding that it "effectively grants owners of highly valued
property a privilege not equally afforded to lower value property and nonproperty owning
residents." The Court, however, let stand the "Election Method" of annexation. The applicant,
Falk Annexation Resolution/Prezoning 2
12/30/02
Steven Beck, has reduced the size of the former Falk Annexation to two parcels and the abutting
street right-of-way. Although there are only two registered voters living on these two parcels, he
feels confident that they will support the subject annexation and agree on behalf of existing and
future property owners of the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's outstanding
indebtedness. Although a petition representing 10% of the registered votes in the proposed
annexation area was submitted on November 15th, it was decided to proceed with a Council
resolution rather than waiting for the County Clerk to certify the signatures.
This approach requires that Council adopt the attached resolution finding that it would be in the
best interests and general welfare of the City to annex the subject two parcels and abutting street
right-of-way. The resolution describes the property to be annexed as well as indicates whether the
City will pay for the cost of the election. The resolution calls for an election on two issues:
1)whether the area is to be annexed, and 2) whether property owners within the annexation area
will assume a proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness.
This revised application, at 6.43-acres, is smaller than the former application of a year ago. It is
still located at the corner of S 47tb Street (if extended) and 102"a Avenue SE in King County and
includes the northern two parcels of the former proposal. Additional information on this revised
annexation is included on the attached Falk Annexation Data Sheet.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION:
(Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429)
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject annexation site is
located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is within an area seeing increased
development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-379, attached). Renton's Comprehensive Plan
Land Use designation for this area is Residential Single Family, which allows up to 8 dwelling
units per net acre. Under King County's Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning the
area is unlikely to achieve urban densities. It is currently designated "Greenbelt/Urban Separator"
and zoned for one dwelling unit per acre. The City and the County have been in discussions about
how to resolve this disparity. However, an agreement between King County, the Growth
Management Planning Council and the City is now in place to remove this area from the Urban
Separator in the adopted Countywide Planning Policies. As a result the City may rezone the
property to a higher density upon annexation without contradicting regional planning agreements.
Renton is the logical service provider of most urban services and infrastructure for this area (Policy
LU-383, attached). Policy LU-388 states that in general, the greater the contiguity with the city
limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the city limits
along 50% of its perimeter. Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be "readily
identifiable in the field". The proposal follows lot lines along its northern and eastern boundaries
and existing parcels on its western and southern boundaries. There are no alternative boundaries to
the south that would be more consistent with this policy, without substantially increasing the size
of the proposed annexation.
Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives:
(from RCW 36.93.180)
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities:
The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk\Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw
Falk Annexation Resolution/Prezoning
12/30/02
b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land
contours;
The proposed annexation follows city boundaries on two of its four sides, parcel lines on one side,
and street right-of-way also on two of its four sides.
c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
With the exception of water and sewer service which are to be provided by the Soos Creek Water
and Sewer District, the city is capable of providing all urban services to the proposed annexation
area. The City currently serves the area north of South 49`h Street and west of the proposed
annexation.
d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
The proposed annexation has regular boundaries and is rectangular in shape.
e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas.
Not applicable.
f Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
Not applicable.
g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries
Neither the existing City boundary nor the proposed new boundaries are impractical.
h. Incorporation as cities or town or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which
are urban in character; and,
This area is designated for urban development in that it is located within King County's Urban
Growth Boundary.
Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term projective
agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative
authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Falk Annexation area are rural or designated for long
term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. Although the King
County Comprehensive Plan currently designates this area as Greenbelt/Urban Separator. King
County staff in their role as staff to the Growth Management Planning Council agreed to designate
this area for urban development and remove it from the Urban Separator in exchange for more
suitable land at another location. The City requested that King County redesignate the area as
Urban Residential — 4-12 du/ac with R-6 or R-4 zoning.
Fiscal Impact of the Proposed Annexation:
The project proponent anticipates future single-family residential development on the 5.96-acre
non -street portion of the annexation area. Staff estimate up to 40 dwelling units with a population
of 100 people could result. Estimated costs to the City based upon staffs most recent fiscal
analysis indicate that costs would exceed revenues by approximately $679 per year over at least the
initial years of the development (see attachments).
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk\Election Resolution Issue Papendoc\jw
Falk Annexation Resolution/Prezoning 4
12/30/02
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED R-8 PREZONING
Consistency with City of Renton Rezone Criteria:
1. The rezone is in the public interest;
Prezoning the annexation site to a zone designation that is similar to surrounding uses is in the
public interest. Also, providing this zoning now, as allowed in RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides
better predictability for those voting on this annexation.
2. The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of
the petitioner;
The prezoning of the annexation site will help ensure that the property owners retain development
potential similar to that of other nearby properties having similar development potential.
3. The rezone is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons
located in the vicinity thereof,
The proposed City's proposed R-8 zoning is considerable denser than the County's current R-1
(Urban Separator) zoning. It was determined through the Growth Management Planning Council
review process that R-1 (Urban Separator) zoning is inappropriate at this location. However, the
R-8 zone would be compatible with the County's R-6 zoning since Renton's zoning calculates
density based on net acres and the County calculates density based upon gross acres. Assuming net
density as 80% of gross density, the number of units that could be developed is nearly identical
under these two zones.
4. The rezone meets the review criteria in subsections Flb and Flc of this Section, i.e. the
pEoper1y is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested, pursuant to the policies
set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and,
As noted above the property is potentially classified for the R-8 zone because it is designated as
Residential Single Family on City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use
analysis and area zoning or, since the most recent land use analysis or area zoning authorized
public improvements private development or other circumstances affecting the prope have
undergone significant and material change.
Since the last area zoning there have been significant changes in the area with new subdivisions
developing to the west, east and south. Also, the subject annexation site is within Renton's
Potential Annexation Area and is designated for annexation under adopted City and County
policies.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed annexation is generally consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies
related to annexations and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to
the provision of City services to the area have been identified at this early stage. In terms of future
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk\Election Resolution Issue Papendoc\jw
Falk Annexation Resolution/Prezoning
12/30/02
5
zoning for the site, the R-8 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well. King County
staff and the Growth Management Planning Council have also supported the removal of the Urban
Separator designation. This redesignation allows consideration of a higher density zoning for the
site upon annexation.
The fiscal impacts of this proposed annexation are also relatively minor with a one time estimated
cost of $21,320 dollars for parks and an on -going annual cost of an estimated $680 dollars per year
at full development.
Attachments
cc: Don Erickson
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk\Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw
PROPOSED FALK ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEET
...................
...................
Piave r.es
...................
...................
Casts::.. .
Units
Population
AV
Existing dev.
1
2
$548,000
Full dev.
40
100
$10,000,000
Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household
$250,000 AV / new unit
1 existing house will not redevelop
Existing
Full
Rate
Regular levy
$1,787
$32,604
3.26036
Excesslevy
$51
$940
0.09397
State shared revenues
Rate(per cap)
Existing
Full
Liquor tax
$3.30
$6.60
$330.00
Liquor Board profits
$5.29
$10.58
$529.00
Fuel tax - roads
$14.45
$28.90
$1,445.00
Fuel tax - arterials
$6.76
$13.52
$676.00
MVET
$0.00
$0.00
Camper excise
$0.00
$0.00
Criminal justice
$0.91
$1.82
$91.00
Total
$61.42
$3,071.00
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate
Existing
Full
Real estate excise*
$54.69
$109.38
$5,469.00
Utility tax**
$133.00
$133.00
$5,320.00
Fines & forfeits*
$17.13
$34.26
$1,713.00
Total
$276.64
$12,502.00
* Per capita
** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing
Per capita
Existing
Full
Contracted Services -
Alcohol
$0.23
$0.45
$22.70
Public Defender
$3.13
$6.27
$313.40
Jail
$7.19
$14.38
$719.20
Subtotal
$21.11
$1,055.30
Court/legal/admin.
$50.96
$101.92
$5,096.00
Parks maintenance*
$14.90
$29.80
$1,490.00
Police
$270.00
$540.00
$27,000.00
Road maintenance**
$0.00
$1,715
Fire***
$1.25
$685.00
$12,500.00
Total
$1,377.83
$48,856.30
* See Sheet Parks FIA
** See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract)
Qr3etire hosts;' Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA)
Other one-time costs:
................
Total revenues
Existing !' ....................
....................
....................
Full $0176 6
........... I........
....................
Total ongoing costs
Existing:::::::':::',:::::::::::':$ ; 377 83
FuII $d885630i
....................
Net fiscal impact
Existing $74691
$21,319.60
$0.00
....................
Total one-time costs:'i
PARKS ACQUISTION AND MAINTENANCE COST CALCULATION SHEI
Needs: FALK ANNEXATION
Acquisition of land for new neighborhood & community park
Development of new neighborhood & community parks
Maintenance of neighborhood & community parks
Assumptions:
$60,000 per acre for land acquistion
$125,000 per acre for development (both neighborhood & community parks)
$6,000 per acre to maintain neighborhood parks
$7,000 per acre to maintain community parks
1.2 acres/1,000 for neighborhood park (LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan)
1.1 acres/1,000 for community park (LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan)
100 population after 10 years (projected growth)
40 housing units after 10 years (projected growth)
$530.76 per single family unit mitigation fees
40 New single family units
Per capita annual and one-time costs:
One-time Costs:
Acquisition:
Neighborhood:
1 * 1.2/1000 * $60,000 =
$72.00
Community:
1 * 1.1A 000 * $60,000 =
$66.00
Development:
Neighborhood:
1 * 1.2/1,000 * $125,000=
$150.00
Community:
1 * 1.1/1,000 * $125,000=
$137.50
Total one-time costs: $425.50
Mitigation fees: New units * $530.76 = $21,230.40
Acquisition & development costs minus mitigation fees: $21,319.60
Ongoing costs: (1 * 1.2/1,000 * $6,000) + (1 * 1.1 /1,000 * $7,000) _ $14.90
(park maintenance)
RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Policy LU-378. The City should encourage annexation of all territory within its Potential
Annexation area, as depicted on the City's adopted land use map.
Policy LU-379. Encourage annexation where the availability of infrastructure and
services allow for the development of urban densities. Renton should be the primary
service provider of urban infrastructure and services in the resultant area provided that
the City can offer such services in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Policy LU-383. Encourage annexations of areas in which the City of Renton should
logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services.
Policy LU-388. The proposed annexation boundary should be defined by the following
characteristics:
a. annexation of territory that is adjacent to the existing City limits; in general, the
more land adjacent to the City the more favorable the annexation;
b. inclusion of unincorporated islands and peninsulas;
c. use of boundaries that are readily identifiable in the field, such as waterways,
ridges, park property, roads/freeways, and railroads;
d. inclusion/exclusion of an entire neighborhood, rather than dividing portions of the
neighborhood between city and county jurisdictions; and
e. natural corridors should be identified and included as greenbelts or community
separators between the City and adjacent jurisdictions.
FALK ANNEXATION SITE INFORMATION SHEET
Location: The subject area is bounded on the north by South 47 h Street, on the west by existing city
limits, on the east by the eastern edge of the 102nd Avenue SE right-of-way, and on the south by
existing parcels in unincorporated King County.
2. Assessed Value: The assessed value at current development is $548,000.
3. Existing Land Uses: Existing development includes two single-family homes, one on 4.91 acres and
the other on a 1.05 acre lot.
4. Existing zoning: King County zoning of the annexation area is R-1. This zone allows a base density
of one unit per gross acre.
5. Natural Features: The subject site is generally flat with a gradual slope to the north. The
southwestern portion of the site has steeper slopes as does the northeastern corner (Figure 3).
6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation site as Residential
Single Family which either R-8 or RMH zoning. R-8 allows a base density of eight units per net
acre and RMH zoning is for manufactured housing developments. Whereas King County's
Comprehensive Plan currently designates the subject area Greenbelt/Urban Separator with R-1,
Residential one DU per acre zoning, efforts are underway in the County to change this designation to
Urban Residential 4-12 du/acre.
7. Public Services: No impediments to service delivery or unusual costs were noted by responding
departments and divisions.
Water Utility: The subject area is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. By
agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan, Soos Creek Water and
Sewer Utility is the designated service provider for this area.
In addition the staff note that a certification of water availability from the District will be required
prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following its annexation to the
City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system will also be required for new
development in the annexed area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for
new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic
water service.
Sewers: The area currently is not served by sewer. The annexation area is located within the Soos
Creek Water and Sewer District service area. Sewers could be extended either by developer
extension or local improvement district.
Parks: There are two park facilities within three fourths of a mile of the annexation area. One is
Springbrook Park, located within the City and the other is the Cleveland Park site (undeveloped)
and outside of the City near SE 196' Street and Talbot Road South.
Fire: The area is currently served by Fire District No. 40. Upon annexation the City will be the
service provider for this area.
Public Works Maintenance: Maintenance staff has noted no infrastructure issues at the current level
of development.
Surface Water: Surface Water Utility staff note that any new construction that would occur as a result of
this proposed annexation should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water
Drainage Manual, Level 2 Flow Control Storm Water and Water Quality Standards. An inventory of
existing drainage infrastructure within the proposed annexation area will also need to be conducted to
better assess the financial impact of the proposed annexation to the City.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON LYING
IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY THE CITY OF RENTON
CORPORATE BOUNDARY, INCLUDING SE 47TH STREET, TO THE
NORTH; SE 185TH PLACE, IF EXTENDED, TO THE SOUTH; 102ND
AVENUE SE, TO THE EAST; AND THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY,
TO THE WEST. (FALK ANNEXATION)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it
would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property
generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including SE 471h Street, to the
north; SE 1851h Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing
City boundary, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if fully set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this
annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would
be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area
bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including SE 471h Street, to the north; SE
185`h Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City
RESOLUTION NO.
boundary, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if fully set forth.
SECTION III.
aforesaid territory is two.
SECTION IV.
As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the
The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to
Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for
annexation.
SECTION V. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed
shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property
located within the City of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the
voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at, the date of annexation.
SECTION VI. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed
shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of Renton zoning regulations,
prepared under RCW 35.A.14.340, with a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single
Family (RS) and a zoning designation of R-8 (Residential single family, 8 dwelling units per acre).
SECTION VII. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of
Renton.
SECTION VIII. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the
King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION IX.
The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary
Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.953:11 /27/02:ma
day of 72002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2002.
3
EXHIBIT A
FALK ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter
of Section 32, Township23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half (1/2) of said subdivision;
EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof;
TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of the
Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter
of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, all in Section 32, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as
follows:
Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of the plat of Windsor
Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats, Page 28 through 30, inclusive, records
of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest
corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of way margin of 102"d
Ave SE;
Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary
line and right of way margin, crossin§ 102 Ave SE, to an intersection with the
westerly right of way margin of 102" Ave SE and the termination of said line.
F71
Falk Annexation
Exhibit 2: Existing Structures
Uti�Y o{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
Alex Pietscb, acting Administrator
rr G. Del Rosario
19 December 2002
0 300 600
Existing Structure 1:31600
Existing Corporate Boundary
Proposed Annexation Boundary
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI a:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: January 13, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (6581)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Wong Annexation Election Resolution and Prezoning
Correspondence..
Public Hearing on January 27, 2003
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
• Issue Paper
• Resolution
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur al Dept Leg P
Finance Dept......
Other.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In November 2001 Council held a public hearing and accepted the 60 % Petition for the Wong
Annexation. The Council also authorized the administration to submit a Notice of Intention
Package to the King County Boundary Review Board. On February 8, 2002 the Boundary
Review Board notified the City that it deemed the proposed annexation effective as of February
7, 2001. However, before the City could officially accept the annexation and complete
prezoning for it the State Supreme Court invalidated the petition method of annexation, leaving
only the election method of annexation available.
Because the western half of the subject site is central to the construction of a City initiated
storm water detention pond, and City jurisdiction over it will facilitate permitting and
construction, annexation utilizing the election method is now being pursued. Scheduling
January 27, 2003 for a presentation on the proposed Wong Annexation and resolution
authorizing an annexation election is in the City interest. Holding the first of two required
public hearings on proposed prezoning at the same time will also help expedite bringing the
subject site into the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
• Council set the date.of January 27, 2003 for a presentation on the proposed Wong
Annexation and consideration of a resolution authorizing an annexation election this spring
for the site.
Council set the first of two required public hearings on the prezoning of the site for this same
date.
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS,
AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 3, 2003
TO:
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
City Council Members
VIA: J
Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM:
Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator
Economic Development, Neighborhoods,
and Strategic Planning Department
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581)
SUBJECT: Proposed Vuong Annexation
TS4T TFS-
• Should the Council support and initiate an election annexation by resolution for the 2.70-acre ,-
Vuong annexation site?
• Should property owners within the Vuong Annexation be asked to assume their fair share of the
City's bonded indebtedness?
• Should the City adopt R-8 zoning for this annexation?
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Adopt a resolution authorizing and arranging for an annexation election to consider annexing the
"Vuong Site" and adjacent street right-of-way to the City; and
• Require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's
outstanding bonded indebtedness.
• Support R-8 zoning for the annexation because it is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Designation, Residential Single Family (RS), for this area.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
In December 2001 the City submitted the Notice of Intention package for this annexation with the
Boundary Review Board in response to a 60% petition to annex. On February 8, 2002 the Boundary
January 3, 2003
Page 2
Review Board completed its required evaluation of the proposed annexation and deemed it effective
on February 7, 2002. On March 14, 2002 the Washington Supreme Court invalidated the petition
method of annexation which had been in use in the state for over 57 years. The Court left stand the
election method of annexation in which only registered voters residing in the annexation area may
vote.
The election method can be initiated by a petition signed by 10% of the registered voters in the
proposed annexation area or, by a resolution from the legislative body of annexing city. The City as
owner of the western half of the annexation site supports initiating this proposed annexation by the
quicker "resolution" method. Under this method the City Council passes a resolution describing the
property to be annexed and calling for an election to be held to submit the proposal for annexation to
voters of the area. The resolution may also state the number of voters residing in the area, whether
the city or applicant will pay for the cost of the election, and whether those owning property in the
annexation area shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as the property
within the annexing city.
The Surface Water Utility Division (SWU) of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
requested that City Council initiate annexation of the Vuong Site and abutting SE 116'' Street (NE 10`''
Street) right-of-way. In 2002 the Surface Water Utility purchased the western 1.13 acres of the
Vuong property to construct a stormwater detention pond. This new detention pond is part of the
approved 2003 SWU CIP budget (the NE 10`h Street & Anacortes Avenue NE Storm System
Improvement Project), and is intended to help reduce flooding in the area. Annexing the site to the
City will facilitate permitting and construction. Were the site not to annex, SWU anticipates
significant additional cost to the City in terms of review time and permit fees. The remaining eastern
portion of the Vuong Annexation site is occupied by the two property owners. They have indicated a
desire to annex into the City.
Because the City abuts the 2.70-acre Vuong site along one of its four sides, and because the site is
bounded on the south by an existing street right-of-way (SE 116'' Street), the Washington State
Boundary Review Board for King County has already found that this proposed annexation complies
with the provisions of RCW 36.93.180, Objectives of boundary review board. The boundaries are
reasonable with no irregular boundaries proposed, logical service areas would result, and existing
neighborhoods and communities are not changed.
In terms of the zoning that would be applied when the site comes into the City, staff notes that the
annexation site is currently designated Residential Single Family on the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map. Only two zones are allowed under this land use designation, R-8 (Single-family detached,
8 du/net acre) and RMH (Residential Manufactured Homes). Given the predominance of single-
family detached housing in the surrounding area and the County's current R-6 zoning on the site, staff
is recommending R-8 zoning. Because this zone's density is based on net acres it is comparable to
the County's R-6 zoning which is based upon gross acreage.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION:
(Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429)
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject property is
within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is subject to development pressure (Policies LU-
378). The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning
January 3, 2003
Page 3
and subdivision regulations. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to
the area (Policy LU-383).
Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be readily identifiable in the field. The
proposal follows lot lines along the north, west and east boundaries. There are no alternative
boundaries more consistent with Policy LU-388 that could be used, without increasing the size of
the annexation.
2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives:
(from RCW 36.93.180)
This proposed annexation has already been found to be consistent with the criteria for annexation
set forth in RCW 36.93.180 by the Boundary Review Board for King County.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED R-8 PREZONE:
1. The rezone is in the public interest;
Prezoning the annexation site to a zone designation that is similar to surrounding uses is in the public
interest. Also, providing this zoning now, as allowed in RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides better
predictability for those voting on this annexation.
2. The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of
the petitioner;
The prezoning of the annexation site will help ensure that the property owners retain development
potential similar to that which they currently have.
3. The rezone is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons
located in the vicinity thereof;
The proposed R-8 zone, as noted above, is compatible with the County's R-6 zoning since Renton's
zoning calculates density based on net acres and the County calculates density based upon gross acres
4. The rezone meets the review criteria in subsections Flb of this Section, i.e. the property is
potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested, pursuant to the policies set forth in
the Comprehensive Plan, and,
As noted above the property is potentially classified for the R-8 zone because it is designated as
Residential Single Family on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use
analysis and area zoning, or, since the most recent land use analysis or area zoning authorized
public improvements, private development or other circumstances affecting the property have
undergone significant and material change (Flc).
Since the last area zoning there have been significant changes in the area with new subdivisions
developing to the east and south. There also is an ongoing need to address flooding in this area.
Also, the subject annexation site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is designated for
annexation under adopted City and County policies.
January 3, 2003
Page 4
CONCLUSION:
The proposed annexation is generally consistent with the annexation policies in the Comprehensive
Plan and was found to comply with the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. Because this
proposed annexation was already submitted to and approved by the Boundary Review Board we have
been informed that it need not be resubmitted.
The fiscal impact to the City at current and future development is slightly negative, decreasing from a
minus < $392 > dollars per year to a minus < $107 > dollars per year in 2001 dollars. Such
differences between revenues and costs are typical for annexations of residential areas. Staff review
indicated no known impediments to the extension of City services to the subject area.
At the time that the Council considers the proposed resolution calling for annexation by election the
first of two public hearings will be held on the proposed R-8 zoning. This is necessary since such
zoning would be applied to the subject site at the time it comes into the City, pursuant to RCW
35.A.14. The proposed R-8 zoning is both consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map designation and the County's existing R-6 zoning
Also, the proponent, the City's Surface Water Utility, notes that bringing the western portion of the
site is expected to expedite development of a new stormwater detention pond and result in a cost
savings to the City. SWU staff feels confident that this annexation election will succeed. There are
two registered voters on the property and both are anticipated to support the annexation and assume
their fair share of the City's outstanding bonded indebtedness.
Attachments (4)
Cc: Jay Covington
Rebecca Lind
Ron Straka
Don Erickson
Documentl/
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY (VUONG ANNEXATION) TO THE
CITY OF RENTON LYING IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE BOUNDARY TO THE WEST,
APPROXIMATELY THE NORTHERN EDGE OF NE LOTH PL., IF
EXTENDED, TO THE NORTH, AND THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF NE
LOTH ST. TO THE SOUTH, AND THE WESTERN EDGE OF 137TH
AVENUE NE, IF EXTENDED, TO THE EAST.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it
would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property
generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary to the west, approximately the
northern edge of NE 10`h Pl., if extended, to the north, the southern edge of NE 10`h St. to the
south, and the western edge of 1371h Avenue NE, if extended, to the east, legally described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WAKIINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would
be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area
bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary to the west, approximately the northern edge
of NE 10`h Place, if extended, to the north, the southern edge of NE I oth Street to the south, and
the western edge of 1371h Avenue NE, if extended, to the east, legally described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION III. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the
aforesaid territory is two.
SECTION IV.' The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to
Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for
annexation.
SECTION V. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed
shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property
located within the City of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the
voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at, the date of annexation.
SECTION VI. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed,
excluding street right-of-ways, shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of
Renton zoning regulations, prepared under RCW 35.A.14.340, with a Comprehensive Plan
designation of residential single family (RS) and a zoning designation of R-8.
SECTION VII.
Renton.
SECTION VIII.
The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of
The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the
King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board.
SECTION IX. The King County Boundary Review Board previously reviewed and
approved the Notice of Intention submitted on December 24, 2001, on February 8, 2002 as
required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.957:12/16/02:ma
EXHIBIT "A"
WONG ANNEXATION
NE 10TH STREET & ANACORTES AVENUE NE
The south half of West half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County,
Washington; EXCEPT roads;
King County Parcel No. 102305-9129
TOGETHER WITH adjoining road right of way dedicated as SE 116`h Street (NE 10`h Street
in City of Renton)
The westerly line of this described property abuts the Renton City Limits as annexed by
Ordinance No. 2000.
Documenak
Proposed Wong Annexation
C
C
00
'1r' 11
- o
NE 8th St
7t I
0 400 800
---- Proposed Annexation Boundary
1:4,800
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — Existing Corporate Boundary
+.+ Sue Carlson, Administrator
a w Rosario
��NTC 24May 2001
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. Finance & Information Services
Staff Contact...... Victoria Runkle
Subject:
Request to Fill FTE Finance Analyst II Position at
Grade 13, Step D
Exhibits:
Memo dated January 2, 2003
I AI#: "1.4 , I
For Agenda of:
January 13, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: $0
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
X
A Limited Term Finance Analyst II position in the Finance & Information Services department
was converted to a FTE position as of January 1, 2003. After posting the FTE position in
December 2002, Dawna Truman, the incumbent in the Limited Term position, was selected to
fill the permanent FTE position. Since the incumbent has worked in the Limited Term position
at Grade 13, Step D, staff seeks Council's concurrence to continue the incumbent at Step D.
There is no budget impact to continue the incumbent as a FTE at Step D.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council concur and approve filling the FTE Finance Analyst II position
at a Grade 13, Step D.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bb
C
1►
li� CITY OF RENTON
�u
Finance & Information Services Department
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 2, 2003
To: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President and
City Council Members
VIA: J� Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Victoria Runkle, Finance & IS Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Victoria A. Runkle
SUBJECT: Full Time Employee (FTE) Finance Analyst II, Grade 13, Step D
Dawna Truman was selected to fill the FTE Finance Analyst position effective January 1, 2003, and is
assigned to the Budget group. Since June 2002, Dawna worked as the incumbent in this position, at Step
D, when the position was Limited Term. Dawna has been assigned to the Budget group since 2001. She
meets all of the requirements for the position and has a year and a half experience in fulfilling the duties
and requirements in budgeting.
Since there are no budget impacts to continue Dawna at a Step D in the FTE Finance Analyst II position,
I request that Council concur and approve filling the FTE Finance Analyst II position at Step D, effective
January 1, 2003.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. I look forward to talking to you about this request at
the Finance Committee meeting.
VAR/dlf
cc: Michael Webby, HR & RM Administrator
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Human Svcs
Staff Contact...... Karen Bergsvik x6652
Subject:
Pilot project to consolidate Human Services application
and funding process.
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Memorandum of Understanding
Resolution
Al #:
For Agenda of: January 13, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Committee of the Whole Legal Dept....X.....
Finance Dept..X....
HRRM........... X
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $185,000 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $ 67,300 Revenue Generated......... $117,700
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. $ 67,300
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Kent, Federal Way, Renton, SeaTac, and
Tukwila all commonly fund the Crisis Clinic, King County Sexual Assault Resource Center and
Community Health Centers of King County resulting in multiple contracts and staff monitoring
those contracts. The cities want to coordinate the contracting process with these agencies
resulting in one contract and one staff person monitoring each agency. This one-year pilot
provides the opportunity to evaluate whether this method of contract administration can result in
administrative savings for the cities and agencies. If successful, the program will be expanded to
allow agencies to submit a single application to all cities. Each city will continue to follow its
own process to evaluate applications and determine funding and service levels, receive city -
specific reports from the agencies, and approve reports prior to any agency payment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign
the Memorandum of Understanding for planning, funding, and implementation of a joint human
services application funding program.
RentonnedagnbilU bh
Exhibit A
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
SY
♦ •
DATE: January 2, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members, Renton City Council
C
VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Jim Shepherd p
Community Sices Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Bergsvip, ext. 6652
Human Services Division
SUBJECT: Pilot Project to consolidate the Human Services application
and funding process
ISSUE:
Whether the City of Renton should enter into an agreement with other South
King County cities for a pilot program to consolidate the application for funding
and administration of contracts with agencies commonly funded by many of the
cities.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Human Services staff that Council authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding for the
planning, funding, and implementation of a joint human services application and
funding program.
Page 1 of 3;1/3/2003;H:\HUMAN_SE\2003funding\JointFundingPilot\issuepaper.doc
Exhibit A
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Kent, Federal Way,
Renton, SeaTac and Tukwila all commonly fund the Crisis Clinic, King County
Sexual Assault Resource Center, and Community Health Centers of King County
resulting in nine contracts and nine staff persons monitoring those contracts.
The cities want to coordinate the contracting process with these agencies
resulting in one contract and one staff person monitoring each agency. The
agencies are still responsible for meeting the performance measures for each
city and providing individual cities with the required reports. Each agency will be
assigned a lead city that will be responsible for contracting with and processing
payment for their agency. A process is in place to allow cities to withhold
payment if there are any performance issues with a particular agency.
The lead city will invoice each participating city for the total annual funding
allocation approved by their City Councils for their designated agency by January
30, 2003 and disperse the funds quarterly after the reports have been approved.
Renton, as the lead city for King County Sexual Assault Resource Center
(KCSARC), will invoice the participating cities for $117,700 (KCSARCS's 2003
allocations from the other cities). Renton will be invoiced for $32,300 by the lead
cities for the other agencies for the amounts allocated in 2003 for the Crisis
Clinic, Community Health Centers of King County and the Part -Time Domestic
Violence Planner. Amounts allocated by the participating cities are shown in
Exhibit A to the attached Memorandum of Understanding. The total expenditure
required for the pilot is $185,000 which is comprised of the $117,700 from other
cities for KCSARC, Renton's $35,000 allocation to KCSARC, and the $32,300
for Renton allocation's to the Crisis Clinic, Community Health Centers and the
Domestic Violence Planner. The net expenditure for Renton is unchanged.
While not increasing the amount of funds an agency is receiving, administering
the contracts in this manner is expected to reduce the administrative burden on
that agency so more funds may be used for direct services instead of
administrative costs. This one-year pilot program will be used to evaluate staff
time saved by participating agencies and cities. If successful, the program would
expand so agencies would only have to complete one application for all
participating cities instead of applying to each city individually.
CONCLUSION:
Joining with other cities to consolidate the application and funding process would
be beneficial to both Renton and the funded agencies and makes the most
efficient use of scarce resources available. As such, staff recommends Council
approve the resolution authorizing execution of the Memorandum of
Understanding.
Page 2 of 3;1/3/2003;H:\HUMAN_SE\2003funding\JointFundingPilot\issuepaper.doc
Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
THE CITIES OF AUBURN, BURIEN, COVINGTON,
DES MOINES, FEDERAL WAY, KENT, RENTON,
SEATAC, AND TUKWILA FOR PLANNING,
FUNDING, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A JOINT
HUMAN SERVICES APPLICATION AND FUNDING
PROGRAM.
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is entered into pursuant
to Chapter 39.34 RCW by the Cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal
Way, Kent, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila, Washington hereinafter referred to as "Cities",
to provide for planning, funding, and implementation of a joint human services
application and funding program.
WHEREAS, the Cities engage in activities which support human service providers in
King County; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to make the most efficient use of their resources by
cooperating to provide funding to support human service providers in south King County;
and
WHEREAS, through the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the parties have the authority to
engage in cooperative efforts which result in more efficient use of Government resources;
and
NOW THEREFORE, and in consideration of the terms, conditions and performances
made herein, it is agreed as follows:
1. Purpose of MOU: The purpose of the MOU is the set up a cooperative arrangement
between the Cities to consolidate the human services application and funding process.
Four nonprofit human services agencies, commonly funded by many of the Cities, have
been designated by the Cities for calendar year 2003. Nonprofit agencies may be added
or deleted each year as determined by the Cities for the cooperative program.
2. Joint Participation.
a) Lead City. A Lead City will be designated by the Cities for each Nonprofit
Agency, as shown in Exhibit A, to act as the fiscal and administrative agent
for the Cities for that Nonprofit Agency. A Lead City is usually established
by the amount of funding and/or support to the particular Nonprofit Agency.
The responsibilities of the Lead City are described in Section 4.
b) Participating City. A Participating City is a city participating in the
cooperative funding of a Nonprofit Agency, who is not a Lead City.
Participating Cities for each Nonprofit Agency are identified in Exhibit A. A
Participating City shall review quarterly reports from the Nonprofit Agency.
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 2 of 7
If a Participating City becomes concerned with a Nonprofit Agency's
services, it will promptly notify the Lead City. If a Participating City
determines that a Nonprofit Agency is not performing satisfactorily for their
city, the Participating City reserves the right to request the Lead City to
withhold payments to the Nonprofit Agency for their share of funding. In the
event that a claim or lawsuit is initiated by a Nonprofit Agency against any
City for withholding payment, the City requesting the withholding of payment
shall be responsible for settling or defending the claim or lawsuit. In addition,
in the event of any settlement of or judgment on the claim or lawsuit, the City
requesting that payment be withheld shall be fully responsible for the payment
of such settlement of judgment and shall indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the other Cities for such settlement or lawsuit.
c) Nonprofit Agency. For calendar year 2003, the Cities identified and agreed
that they will coordinate to consolidate the human services application and
funding process for the following four Nonprofit Agencies: Crisis Clinic,
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center, Community Health Center, and
the Part -Time Domestic Violence Planner through the King County Coalition
Against Domestic Violence. Nonprofit Agencies may be added or deleted
each year as determined by the Cities for the cooperative program.
3. Funding Arrangement.
a) Allocation. Each Participating City shall provide to the Lead City no later
than March 31 st of each year, the total annual funding allocation approved by
their City Councils for the Nonprofit Agency, as described in Exhibit A. No
administrative costs shall be imposed by the Lead City to the other
Participating Cities. Exhibit A will be updated each year to show the
Nonprofit Agencies, Lead Cities, Participating Cities, and funding amounts
for that calendar year.
b) Return of Unspent Funds. Any monies that the Nonprofit Agency(s) does not
spend during the calendar year shall be proportionately returned to each
Participating City. On or before March 31St of the next calendar year the Lead
City will provide the unspent funds to each Participating City.
4. Responsibilities of Lead City. A Lead City has been designated to act as the fiscal and
administrative agent for the Cities for each Nonprofit Agency, as shown in Exhibit A.
The responsibilities of the Lead City shall include the following:
a) Send an invoice to each Participating City by January 301h of each year for
their annual approved allocation to the Nonprofit Agency.
b) Contract with the Nonprofit Agency each year, for the total funding allocated
by the Participating Cities, detailing performance measures to be performed
by the Nonprofit Agency for each City.
c) Receive, review, and process the quarterly invoices and reports from the
Nonprofit Agency. Quarterly reports shall describe services provided
HAHUMAN_SE\2003fundingVointFundingPilot�Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 3 of 7
specifically to each City. Disputes regarding billings will be resolved among
the Participating Cities.
d) Provide copies of quarterly reports to the Participating Cities, if the reports are
not provided directly by the Nonprofit Agency.
e) Provide the Nonprofit Agency with a funding application and technical
assistance as required.
f) Perform an annual monitoring visit of the Nonprofit Agency, to include the
participation of another Participating City.
g) Maintain accounts and records which properly reflect transactions related to
this MOU.
5. Duration. This MOU shall become effective when it is approved by a majority of the
Cities and shall remain in effect through December 31, 2003, with automatic extensions
annually, unless terminated as described in section 6.
6. Termination. Any party may terminate its participation in the MOU without cause by
giving the other Cities a thirty day written notice. The terminating party shall remain
fully responsible for meeting its funding responsibilities and other obligations established
by this MOU through the end of the calendar year in which such notice is given.
7. Notices. Notices to the Cities shall be sent to the following persons:
city
Contact
Auburn
Planner, currently Shirley Aird
Burien
Management Analyst, currently Lori Fleming
Covington
Administrative Specialist, Human Services,
currently Victoria Throm,
Des Moines
Senior Services Manager, currently Sue Padden
Federal Way
Human Services Manager, currently Lydia Assefa-
Dawson
Kent
Human Services Manager, currently Katherin
Johnson
Renton
Contract Specialist, currently Dianne Utecht
SeaTac
I Senior Project Coordinator, currently Soraya Lowry
Tukwila
Human Services Manager, currently Evelyn Boykan
8. Indemnification.
Each City agrees to indemnify the other Cities from any claims, damages, losses, and
costs, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and litigation costs, arising out of
claims by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, caused
solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of such City, the City's employees,
affiliated corporations, officers, and lower tier subcontractors in connection with this
MOU.
HAi-IUMAN_SE\2003fundingVointFundingPilot\Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 4 of 7
Each City hereby waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington
for claims of any type brought by any City agent or employee against the other Cities.
This waiver is specifically negotiated by the parties and a portion of the City's payment
hereunder is expressly made the consideration for this waiver.
9. Insurance. Each City shall procure and maintain in full force throughout the
duration of the Agreement comprehensive general liability insurance with a minimum
coverage of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence/aggregate for personal injury and property
damage. In the event that a City is a member of a pool of self -insured cities, the City
shall provide proof of such membership in lieu of the insurance requirement above. Such
self insurance shall provide coverage equal to or greater that required of non -self
insurance pool member Cities.
10. Oversight Committee. This Agreement shall be managed by an Oversight
Committee made up of one representative of each City. The representative of each City
shall be that person designated in section 7 of this Agreement. The Oversight
Committee shall meet at least annually to discuss the terms of the Agreement and manage
the services provided pursuant to the Agreement.
11. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any
suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement,
the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be exclusively in King
County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its
attorney's fees and costs of suit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have entered into this MOU as of this
day of , 2003.
CITY OF AUBURN
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
H:\14UMAN_SE\2003fundingVointFundingPilot\Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF BURIEN
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF COVINGTON
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF DES MOINES
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
H:UNMAN_SE\2003fundingVointFundingPilot\Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 6 of 7
CITY OF KENT
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF RENTON
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF SEATAC
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
CITY OF TUKWILA
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
H:MMAN SE\2003fundingUointFundingPilot\Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
Joint Human Services Application and Funding MOU
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT A
to
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Cities for planning, funding,
and implementation of a joint human services application and funding program.
CALENDAR YEAR 2003
Name of Nonprofit Agency
Participating Cities &
Tentative Funding
Crisis Clinic for the telephone
Auburn - Lead City - $1,500
referral line
Burien - $4,500
Covington - $5,000
Des Moines - $2,500
Kent - $5,000
Federal Way - $10,000
Renton - $3,300
SeaTac - $2,780
Tukwila - $2,000
TOTAL - $36,580
King County Sexual Assault
Renton - Lead City - $35,000
Resource Center (KCSARC)
Auburn - $26,500
for sexual assault services
Burien - $7,500
Covington - $3,500
Des Moines - $4,000
Kent - $20,000
Federal Way - $35,000
SeaTac - $7,200
Tukwila - $14,000
TOTAL - $152,700
Community Health Centers
Kent — Lead City - $58,450
for comprehensive medical
Auburn - $27,550
services for low and moderate
Covington - $3,200
income persons.
Federal Way - $31,827
Renton - $24,000
SeaTac - $10,600
TOTAL - $155,627
Part -Time Domestic Violence
Kent — Lead City - $15,000
Planner through King County
Renton - $5,000
Coalition Against Domestic
TOTAL - $20,000
Violence for planning
activities in South King
County.
H:UNMAN_SE\2003funding\]ointFundingPilot\Hum Sery Joint Fund MOUexhibit.doc
Final MOU - December 19, 2002
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR PLANNING, FUNDING
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A JOINT HUMAN SERVICES
APPLICATION FUNDING PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton, along with most other cities, provides for the planning,
funding and implementation of human services programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton, along with the cities of Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des
Moines, Kent, Federal Way, SeaTac, and Tukwila, wish to make the most efficient use of their
resources by cooperating to provide joint application and funding for human services; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide, in writing, the terms and conditions under which
this joint program is to be executed;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an
Interlocal Cooperative Agreement entitled "Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of
Auburn, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Kent, Federal Way, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila for
Planning, Funding and Implementation of a Joint Human Services Application and Funding
Program."
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.954:12/2/02:ma
day of
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
2002.
day of 92002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2