HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 03/03/2003AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
March 3, 2003
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finance
Reporting
b. Police Department 2002 Employee of the Quarter
4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of February 24, 2003. Council concur.
b. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a
public hearing be set on 3/17/2003 to consider the resolution calling for an annexation election
and the proposed prezoning of R-5 for the proposed Bales Annexation; 8.52 acres generally
bounded by SE 128th St. to the north, SE 130th St. to the south, 156th Ave. SE to the east, and
the middle of 152nd Ave. SE to the west. Council concur.
c. Transportation Systems Division requests authorization to amend the 2003 Capital Improvement
Program in the amount of $357,624 for the Airport Apron C area utility conversion project, and
to appropriate and adjust the 2003 Budget for the Airport 402 account by $357,624 from the
Airport Reserve Fund. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
d. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a consultant agreement in the amount
of $2,213,349 with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for the design of the Strander Blvd. extension from
West Valley Hwy. to East Valley Rd. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
7. CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Robert D. Johns and Duana T. Kolouskova, attorneys, 1500 114th Ave. SE, Suite 102,
Bellevue, 98004, representing Patricia Wilson, withdrawing her appeal of the Elle Rain Preliminary
Plat (PP-02-047).
8. OLD BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the chairman if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Mark Rigos Appointment to Board of Adjustment; Landscape
Maintenance Services Contract
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
11. AUDIENCE COMMENT
12. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room, 7th Floor
6:30 p.m.
Boeing "Move to the Lake" Manufacturing/Design Consolidation Proposal
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
March 3, 2003
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the
meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TERRI BRIERE; KING
COUNCILMEMBERS
PARKER; DON PERSSON; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; DAN
CLAWSON.
CITY STAFF IN
JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE
LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk;
GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;
LESLIE BETLACH, Parks Director; VICTORIA RUNKLE, Finance &
Information Services Administrator; ELAINE GREGORY, Fiscal Services
Director; GINA JARVIS, Finance Analyst Supervisor; DEREK TODD,
Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, DEPUTY CHIEF
KEVIN MILOSEVICH, COMMANDER KATHLEEN MCCLINCY, and
COMMANDER CURTIS SMALLING, Police Department.
SPECIAL
Finance and Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle introduced
PRESENTATIONS Finance Analyst Supervisor Gina Jarvis who announced that Renton was
Finance: Financial Reporting presented a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting in
Award, 2001 CAFR recognition of its 2001 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) from
the Government Finance Officers Association. Ms. Jarvis recognized the
cumulative effort of the entire Finance Department in preparing the CAFR each
year.
Police: Employee Recognition Police Chief Garry Anderson, before beginning his presentation, introduced the
new Crime Analyst, Shirley Rickman, and he also thanked Commander Curtis
Smalling for performing the Deputy Chief and Chief duties as needed over the
past six months. Chief Anderson then announced the Police Department
Employees of the Quarter awards for 2002 as follows:
Employee of the First Quarter: Officer Christine Paget and Sergeant Chad
Karlewicz
Employee of the Second Quarter: Officer John Awai
Employee of the Third Quarter: Jailer Tom Wilkinson
Employee of the Fourth Quarter: Officer Jeff Eddy
Chief Anderson announced that Officer John Awai was also chosen as the
Police Department Employee of the Year for 2002.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted
included:
The Gene Coulon Beach Park play area replacement project was completed
and opened to the public in February. Improvements include a redesigned
play area with new play equipment for age groups two to five years and five.
to twelve years, picnic tables, benches, landscaping, lighting, a new paved
trail connection to Bird Island, and a new paved trail connection to the
Southport Development.
March 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 81
• Renton's general property tax rate decreased again in 2003. Renton citizens
pay for basic City services through their property taxes as well as paying
for the Renton School District, countywide emergency management
services, hospital, Washington State for Public Schools, Port of Seattle, and
King County.
• The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's website, www.ready.gov, is
designed to educate the public, on a continuing basis, about how to be
prepared in case of a national emergency. The Renton Fire Department
also offers free disaster preparedness classes, which include handouts,
display kits, and an audio-visual presentation.
• Free composting workshops will be held in March at the Community
Center. Pre -registration is required, and participants will receive one free
composting bin per household.
Finance: Property Tax Rate In regards to the property tax issue, Mayor Tanner noted for the record that
aside from the increases due to new construction and annexation, the Citywide
property tax dollar amount was held to 1 % in accordance with Initiative 747.
He pointed out that the property tax rate decreased by 2.8% from last year.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Arland "Buzz" Johnson, 334 Wells Ave. S., #221, Renton, 98055, noted the
Citizen Comment: Johnson - noise that traffic on I-405 produces and the close proximity of the Spencer
I-405 Noise, Power Outage Court Apartments, located on Wells Ave. S., to I405. He asked for the City's
help in encouraging the State to construct a sound barrier if I-405 is expanded.
Mr. Johnson also noted the occurrence of a power outage on February 16th.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of February 24, 2003. Council concur.
February 24, 2003
Annexation: Bales, SE 128th Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
St recommended a public hearing be set on 3/17/2003 to consider the resolution
calling for an annexation election and the proposed prezoning of R-5
(Residential Single Family; five dwelling units per acre) for the proposed Bales
Annexation; 8.52 acres generally bounded by SE 128th St. to the north, SE
130th St. to the south, 156th Ave. SE to the east, and the middle of 152nd Ave
SE to the west. Council concur.
Airport: 2003 CIP Amend, Transportation Systems Division requested authorization to amend the 2003
Apron C Utility Conversion Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $357,624 for the Airport Apron
C area utility conversion project, and to appropriate and adjust the 2003 Budget
for the Airport 402 account by $357,624 from the Airport Reserve Fund. Refer
to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Transportation: Strander Blvd Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a consultant
Extension Design, Perteet agreement in the amount of $2,213,349 with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for the
Engineering design of the Strander Blvd. extension from West Valley Hwy. to East Valley
Rd. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
March 3, 2003 1 Renton City Council Minutes Page 82
CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Robert D. Johns and Duana T. Kolouskova,
Appeal: Elle Rain Preliminary 1500 114th Ave. SE, Suite 102, Bellevue, 98004, attorneys representing
Plat, Patricia Wilson, PP-02- Patricia Wilson, withdrawing her appeal of the Elle Rain Preliminary Plat (PP-
047 (Withdrawn)
02-047) road modification standards.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL
REMOVE THE ELLE RAIN PRELIMINARY PLAT APPEAL FROM THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REFERRAL LIST.
CARRIED.
City Attorney Larry Warren expressed his gratitude to the Renton Housing
Authority Board for granting the City an emergency access easement across the
Houser Terrace property, which provided the secondary means of access
necessary to develop the Elle Rain plat.
OLD BUSINESS
Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Community Services
recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mark Rigos to the
Committee
Board of Adjustment, Position #3 (practicing professional engineer, State
Appointment: Board of
licensed) for a four-year term expiring on September 6, 2006, replacing Gregg
Adjustment
Guillen who resigned in 2002. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY
CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Community Services:
Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report concurring in
Landscape Maintenance
the staff recommendation to amend the existing landscape services contract
Services, Facility Maintenance
(CAG-01-042) with Facility Maintenance Contractors by extending the contract
Contractors, CAG-01-042
through December 31, 2003. This contract provides for the maintenance of 22
locations including rights -of -way, traffic circles, a fire station, parks, and trails.
The contract amount is $104,521.94. The Committee further recommended that
the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract amendment.
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT.*
In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry, Councilwoman
Nelson confirmed that a Local 2170 union representative attended the
Committee meeting and she emphasized that by contracting out these services,
the City is saving money and is not replacing any City employees.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Tanner stated that the City has a legal right to contract out for services;
however, the City does not have a legal right to replace City employees with
contracted services.
NEW BUSINESS
Councilman Corman reported receipt of a telephone call from Randall South,
Community Services:
518 William Ave. N., #4, Renton, 98055, asking that the City offer disabled
Community Center Weight
persons a discount for using the weight room at the Community Center, similar
Room Fee, Disabled Person
to the discount offered senior citizens. Mr. Corman asked that the
Discount
Administration look into the matter.
Police: Criminal Nuisance
Councilman Clawson noted the recent publicity surrounding the nuisance
Abatement
abatement action being taken against the West Wind Motel located at 110
Rainier Ave. S., and requested more information about the legal implications of
this type of action. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER,
COUNCIL REFER THE ISSUE OF CRIMINAL NUISANCE ABATEMENT
TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
March 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 83 %
Metro: Renton Transit Center Noting the recent stabbing incident at the Renton Transit Center, it was
Safety MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,
COUNCIL REFER THE ISSUE OF RENTON TRANSIT CENTER SAFETY
TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 21 MINUTES TO
DISCUSS LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 8:07 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 8:28 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers
present.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:29 p.m.
RONNIE 1. WALTON, City Clerrk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
March 3, 2003
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 3, 2003
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
(Keolker-Wheeler)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE
(Parker)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Clawson)
MON., 3/10 Endangered Species Act — Golder Study;
6:30 p.m. Lake Washington Trail and Habitat
Enhancement
WED., 3/05
12:30 p.m.
*Meet at City
Hall Lobby*
MON., 3/10
5:30 p.m.
THURS., 3/06
2:00 p.m.
MON., 3/10
6:00 p.m.
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 3/06
(Persson) 2:30 p.m.
UTILITIES
(Corman)
Council Tour of Various Urban Design
Projects
Vouchers
Minimum Area Threshold for
Annexation Elections
Fire Department Records Management
Implementation Contract
Rainier Ave. Corridor Study;
2003 Capital Improvement Program
Amendment — Airport Apron C Utility
Conversion
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 3, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day to -day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The City is seeking applicants to serve as volunteers on boards, commissions, and committees. Specific
information and a community service application are available on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us
or by calling the Mayor's Office at 425-430-6500. Applications are kept on file for one year for consideration
when vacancies occur. Currently, there is one vacancy on the Human Services Advisory Committee, the
Municipal Arts Commission, the Nishiwaki Sister City Advisory Corpmittee, and the Non -Motorized
Transportation Advisory Committee. There are two vacancies.on the Airport Advisory Committee, for
representatives from the West Hill and Talbot Hill areas. Volunteering is an opportunity to make a difference
in the Renton community.
The Renton City Council and City Administration recently held their two-day Annual Workshop to discuss a
variety. of topics, including the previous year's accomplishments, emerging issues, and the City's Business
Plan. The main Business Plan. Goals are: Promote city-wide economic development, Promote neighborhood
revitalization, Promote the City's image in the community and region, Meet the service demands that
contribute to the livability of the community, and Influence regional decisions that impact the City. These
goals have remained relatively constant over the last several years; however, the Council works to fine-tune
the strategies each year. The Business Plan goals and strategies can be found on the City's website at
www.ci.renton.wa.us.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• The Coulon Park Play Area replacement project was completed and opened to the public on Friday, February
14th. Improvements include a re -designed play area with new play equipment for age groups 2-5 years and 5-
12 years, picnic tables, benches, landscaping, lighting; a new paved trail connection to Bird Island, and a new
paved trail connection to the Southport Development.
• Last weekend over 30 delegates (17 special athletes competing in basketball plus their parents, coaches, and
friends) represented the City at the Special Olympics Washington Winter Games 2003 in Wenatchee. The
senior basketball team took the gold medal and the junior basketball team took the silver medal following a .
double overtime tiebreaker game.
• From the Special Populations recreation program Ready, Set, Perform has come STAR (Special Theater Arts
in Renton). This unique group joins together people with and without disabilities who. share a love of the
performing arts. Over 100 were in attendance last week for the STAR performance at Carco Theatre. Several
community volunteers and 15 special needs individuals participated in this year's production, guided and
directed by Colleen Hueiser, Special Populations Recreation Specialist, and Vincent Orduna, Cultural Arts
Coordinator at Carco Theatre.
• In the month of February, the Recreation Athletics Division coordinated 185 youth/adult basketball and
volleyball games; and Recreation Services noted that dedicated volunteers donated 1,031 hours to in the areas
of Special Populations, Youth Basketball, Tae Kwon Do classes, and Art Camp. At a minimum wage of
$7.01, this is a value of $7,227.
Administrative Report
March 3, 2003
Page 2 .
• Don't miss Tingstad and Rumbel, 2003 Grammy Award winners, performing at Carco Theatre on Friday,
March 14th. For tickets, call 425-430-6707.
• The Parks Division will begin tree removal along 2nd Street beginning today, Monday, March 3rd. Previous
notice was sent out that this work would begin in February, but delays occurred that resulted in the start date
being moved.
FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Renton's general property tax rate decreased again in 2003. Renton citizens pay for basic city services through
their property taxes as well as paying for the Renton School District, countywide Emergency Management
Services, Hospital, Washington State for Public Schools, Port of Seattle, and King County. Look for a detailed
description of property tax rates in the March 5th edition of CitySource in the Renton Reporter, or visit the
Spotlight section on the website at www.ei.renton.wa.us.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
READY: make a kit, make a plan, and be informed. Ready.gov is a common sense framework designed by the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.to educate the public via the internet, on a continuing.basis, about how
to be prepared in case of a national emergency. The Renton Fire Department also offers free Disaster
Preparedness classes, which include handouts, display kits, and an audio-visual presentation. Call 425-430-
7000 for additional information or to schedule a class.
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Learn how to turn your yard waste into a rich useful soil amendment, improve the health of your soil and your
plants, and conserve natural resources all at the same time at the City's free composting workshops in March.
You must pre -register to participate in these workshops field at the Community Center by calling 425-430-
7396. Participants will receive one free composting bin per household.
This Wednesday, March 5th, from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Renton Senior Center, there will be an open
house to discuss proposed Express. Bus service changes and additions. One of the new routes proposed is the
Route 564 that would serve Auburn, Kent, Renton, and Bellevue. For additional information contact Sound
Transit via their website at www.soundtransit.org.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
• During the week of March 4-10, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following
areas:
Renton Police Department Traffic Enforcement Emphasis
March 4 —10
Date
6:00 a.m. to Noon
Noon to 6:00
p.m.
All Day
Motorcycles
Cars
Motorcycles
Cars
Radar Trailer
March 4
Hoquiam Ave NE
3800 block, NE 12`h
Rainier Ave N
Rainier Ave N
3800 block, NE 1 Oth
Tuesday
Speed
Speed
Speed
Speed
March 5
Traffic Meeting
Traffic Meeting
School Zones
Rainier Ave N
3800 block, NE 10'h
Wednesday
Speed
Speed
March 6
School Zones
Lake Wash Blvd
Rainier Ave N
School Zones
3300 block, NE 10`h
Thursday
Speed
Speed
Speed
Speed
March 7
Williams Ave @
1100 block, Carr Rd
Lake Wash Blvd
School Zones
3300 block, NE 11`h P1
Friday
Grady Way
Speed
Speed
Speed
Stop Sign
March 10
Lake Wash Blvd
SW Sunset Blvd
School Zones
Rainier Ave N
3300 block, NE 11`h P1
Monday
Speed
Speed/tums
Speed
Speed
1
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #: s
Submitting Data: Economic Development,
Neighborhoods and Strategic
Planning Dept.
Dept/Div/Board.. Strategic Planning
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (6581)
Subject:
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Bales Annexation -
Exhibits:
Issue Paper and Resolution
Recommended Action:
Council concur
For Agenda of:
March 3`d, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing ....... X
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............ X
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept ......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Bud,2et N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City is in receipt of a 10 % Notice of Intent petition to initiate an election method
annexation for approximately 8.52 acres located at the City limits south of NE 4' Street
beginning just east of Rosario Avenue NE, if extended, then eastward approximately 623 feet.
"
State law requires that the Council hold the first of two public hearings on the prezoning for the
annexation site as well as a meeting to consider the resolution authorizing the holding of an
annexation election.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set a Public Hearing date for March 17', 2003.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 19, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
City Council Members
VIA:�(Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator
Economic Development, Neighborhoods,
& Strategic Planning Department
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581)
SUBJECT: Bales Annexation Resolution and Public Hearing on Prezoning
ISSUE:
Should the Council support and initiate an election annexation for the 8.52-acre proposed Bales
Annexation?
• Should property owners within the Bales Annexation be asked to assume their fair share of the
City's bonded indebtedness?
• Should the Bales Annexation area, excluding public right-of-ways, be pre -zoned R-5 Zone?
1.7D[K�)ulul�iU�7_�IIlT�7,�
• Adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election to consider the annexation of the Bales
and neighboring properties abutting the NE 4`h Street right-of-way, to the City:
✓ Condition acceptance of the annexation on property owners within the annexation area
assuming their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness.
✓ Require that the applicant reimburse the City for all King County costs associated with
holding the election that are paid by the City.
• Support prezoning the Bales Annexation site to R-5, Residential Single Family, 5 du/net acre.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Although a petition representing 10% of the assessed value in the proposed annexation area was
submitted in February, 2002, on March 14th, the Washington State Supreme Court invalidated the
"Property Owner Petition Method" of annexation. The Court found that the "Petition Method"
based upon assessed valuations "effectively grants owners of highly valued property a privilege not
equally afforded to lower value property and nonproperty owning residents". However, it let stand
the "Election Method" of annexation. The applicant, Steven Beck, has reintroduced this
annexation hoping to use this latter method. Mr. Beck feels confident that residents within the
Bales Annexation #2/Bales/Annexations/PAA/EDNSP
f .
Bales Annexation Resolution/Prezoning
02/24/03
annexation area will support annexation to Renton and agree, on behalf of existing and future
property owners of the annexation area, to assume their fair share of the City's outstanding
indebtedness.
The "Election Method" requires that Council adopt the attached resolution finding that it would be
in the best interests and general welfare of the City to annex the subject five parcels into the City.
The resolution describes the property to be annexed as well as indicates that the City will pay for
the cost of the election. Whereas the City is required to pay for the election under state law, the
applicant has agreed to reimburse the City for the cost of the election. The resolution calls for an
election on three issues: 1) whether the area is to be annexed, and 2) whether property owners
within the annexation area will assume a proportionate share of the City's outstanding
indebtedness, and 3) whether the annexation site should be zoned R-5, five units per net acre,
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation "Residential Rural".
This revised application, at 8.52-acres, is smaller than the former application of a year ago. The
current application includes five contiguous lots on the south side of NE 41h Street and east of
Rosario Avenue NE, if extended. King County Parks abuts the annexation site on the south at SE
130" Street, if extended. Additional information on this revised annexation is included on the
attached Bales Annexation Data Sheet.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION:
(Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429)
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject annexation site is
located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is within an area seeing increased
development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-379, attached). Renton's Comprehensive Plan
Land Use designation for this area, "Residential Rural," which allows up to 5 dwelling units per net
acre. Under King County's Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning the area is
designated "Urban Residential 4-12 du/ac" and zoned R4, four du/acre. The Administration is
recommending that the annexation site be prezoned R-5, five units per net acre.
Renton is the logical service provider of most urban services and infrastructure for this area (Policy
LU-383). Policy LU-388 states that in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the
more favorable the annexation. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the city limits along 50%
of its perimeter. Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be "readily identifiable in
the field". The proposal abuts a major arterial, NE 4"' Street, along its northern boundary, and a
new residential subdivision within the City on its western boundary. It abuts lands set aside for
future park use in unincorporated King County on its southern boundary. There are no alternative
boundaries to the south that would be more consistent with this policy, without substantially
increasing the size of the proposed annexation.
Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives:
(from RCW 36.93.180)
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities:
The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community.
b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land
contours;
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Bales\Election Resolution Issue Papendoc\d
Bales Annexation Resolution/Prezoning
02/24/03
The proposed annexation follows City boundaries on two of its four sides; the other two include
parcel lines.
c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
The City is the logical service provider for this annexation. It is located within Renton's
designated Sewer Service Area although water is provided by Water District No. 90. It is also
located in Fire District No. 25 but Renton already provides fire suppression services to this area
under contract with the District. City staff has reviewed this application and determined that the
boundaries represent a logical extension of City services.
d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
The proposed annexation has regular boundaries and is generally rectangular in shape.
Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas.
Not applicable.
f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
Not applicable.
g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries
Neither the existing City boundary nor the proposed new boundaries are impractical.
h. Incorporation as cities or town or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which
are urban in character; and,
This area is designated for urban development in that it is located within King County's Urban
Growth Boundary and Renton's Potential Annexation Area.
Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term projective
agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative
authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Bales Annexation area are rural or designated for long
term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan.
Fiscal Impact of the Proposed Annexation:
The project proponent anticipates future single-family residential development on the 8.52-acre
annexation site. Staff estimates up to 34 dwelling units with a population of 85 people could result
at full buildout. Staff s most recent fiscal analysis indicate that costs would exceed revenues by
approximately $151 per year over at least the initial years of the development (see attachments).
New parks in the area could cost the City a one-time cost of $20,244.70 as a result of this
annexation unless King County turns over, at cost, two abutting parcels (9.34 acres) land -banked
for a future county park immediately south of the site. It should be noted that if the state still levied
a Motor Vehicle Excise Tax this annexation would actually show an annual profit to the City in
excess $955.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Bales\Election Resolution Issue Papendoc\d
Bales Annexation Resolution/Prezoning
02/24/03
4
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED R-8 PREZONING
Consistency with City of Renton Rezone Criteria:
1. The rezone is in the public interest;
Prezoning the annexation site to a zone designation that is similar to surrounding uses is in the
public interest. Also, providing this zoning now, as allowed in RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides
better predictability for those voting on this annexation.
2. The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights
of the petitioner;
The prezoning of the annexation site will help ensure that property owners retain development
potential similar to that of other nearby properties having similar development potential.
Renton's proposed R-5 zoning which uses net area to calculate the maximum allowed number of
units, would allow the same number of units on this site as the County's current R-4 zoning
which calculates the maximum number units based upon gross area. Both zones would allow
+34 units on the site.
3. The rezone is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other
persons located in the vicinity thereof;
The City's proposed R-5 zoning is compatible with the County's current R-4 zoning. As noted
above both zones would allow approximately 34 units on the 8.52-acre annexation site.
The rezone meets the review criteria in subsections Flb and Flc of this Section, i.e. the
property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested, pursuant to the
policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and,
As noted above the property is potentially classified for the R-5 Zone because it is designated as
Residential Rural on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land
use analysis and area zoning, or, since the most recent land use analysis or area zoning
authorized public improvements, private development or other circumstances affecting the
property have undergone significant and material change.
Since the last area zoning there have been significant changes in the area with new subdivisions
developing to the west, east and south. Also, the subject annexation site is within Renton's
Potential Annexation Area and is designated for annexation under adopted City and County
policies.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed annexation is generally consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies
related to annexations and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to
the provision of City services to the area have been identified at this early stage. In terms of future
zoning for the site, R-5 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well.
The fiscal impacts of this proposed annexation are also relatively minor with potential one time
estimated cost of $20,245 dollars for parks and an on -going annual cost of an estimated $151
dollars per year at full development.
Attachments
cc: Rebecca Lind
Don Erickson
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Bales\Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\d
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A KESULUT10A OF THE UITY OF RENTON, WASH1NGTUN,
CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF
CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
RENTON LYING IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY THE CITY
OF RENTON CORPORATE BOUNDARY, INCLUDING SE 128TH
STREET TO THE NORTH; SE 130TH STREET, IF EXTENDED, TO THE
SOUTH; 156TH AVENUE SE, IF EXTENDED, TO THE EAST; AND THE
MIDDLE OF 152" AVENUE SE, TO THE WEST. (BALES
ANNEXATION)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it
would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property
generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including SE 128th Street to the
north; SE 130th Street, if extended, to the south; 156th Avenue SE, if extended, to the east; and
the middle of 152°d Avenue SE, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would
be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area
bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including SE 128th Street to the north; SE
130th Street, if extended, to the south; 156th Avenue SE, if extended, to the east; and the middle
of 152°d Avenue SE, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION III.
aforesaid territory is four.
SECTION IV.
As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the
The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to
Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for
annexation.
SECTION V. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed
shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property
located within the City of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the
voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at, the date of annexation.
SECTION VI. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory
sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed
shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of Renton zoning regulations,
prepared under RCW 35.A.14.340, with a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Rural
(RR) and a zoning designation of R-5 (Residential single family, 5 dwelling units per acre).
SECTION VII.
Renton.
SECTION VIII.
The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of
The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the
King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board.
SECTION IX.
The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary
Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
�SSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.952:11/27/02:ma
2002.
EXHIBIT A
BALES ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the east 32.45 feet of the north 406.01 feet thereof;
EXCEPT that portion for street right of way (NE 4`h Street).
C
0 0 -
04
0
i�
Q ❑
0
0
00
0
mum
"I
R
Fr
o �
6 d �
a d 14SO
�1
Proposed Bales Annexation Site _ _ _ Existing City Limits 0 300 600
Figure 2: Existing Structure Map Proposed Annexation
Economic Development,Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Boundary 1 . 3600
•®• Ales Aetwh, echng AAminist for Iff Existing Structure
= G. Del Rmaio
.� 26December=2
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGEND
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division
Staff Contact...... Ryan Zulauf x7471
Subject:
Amendment to 2003 CIP — Apron C Utilities
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Map
AI #:
For Agenda of: March 3, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence.. Ordinance.
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business ....... X
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Transportation Committee Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept ...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $357,624 Transfer/Amendment....... $357,624
Amount Budgeted....... $0 Revenue Generated......... $0
Total Program Budget $0 City Share Total Project.. $357,624
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Boeing will be disconnecting their utility services from Apron "C" by December 31, 2003. Public
utilities, including power, potable water and fire water, will need to be installed to serve this area,
which includes the Airport Maintenance Shop, two buildings totaling 48,000 square feet, fifteen ramp
lighting poles, two electric vehicle gates and a future public restroom.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Transportation System Division recommends that City Council authorize an amendment to the 2003
Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $357,624 for utility conversion on Apron C, and
appropriate and adjust the 2003 Budget for the Airport 402 account by $357,624 from the Airport
Reserve Fund.
C:\Documents and Settings\mneumann\Local Settings\Temp\Revised Agenda Bill for 2003 CIP Adjustment 2-24-02.doc/
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
UA l E: February 24, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the City Council
VIA: Mayor Tanner
FROM: Gregg Zimmermal , Zinistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, x7471
SUBJECT: 2003 CIP Amendment — Apron C Utilities
ISSUE:
Boeing will be disconnecting their utility services from Apron "C" by December 31, 2003. Public
utilities will need to be installed to serve this area, which includes the Airport Maintenance Shop, two
buildings totaling 48,000 square feet, 15 ramp lighting poles, two electric vehicle gates and a future
public restroom.
An amendment to the 2003 CIP is needed to cover the costs of project management, design and
construction of a utility system for Apron "C".
RECOMMENDATION:
The Transportation System Division recommends that Council authorize:
1. An amendment to the 2003 Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $357,624 for this
project; and
2. Appropriate and adjust the 2003 budget for the Airport 402 account by $357,624 from the
Airport Reserve Fund.
BACKGROUND:
Boeing Pulls Out of Apron "C" - On April 5, 2002, Boeing turned -back a large portion of Apron "C",
which included two buildings totaling 48,000 square feet. This area was known as the "North Apron
C Remainder Area" (aircraft positions C-9 through C-13) in the Boeing lease. The disposal of this
leased area completes Boeing's withdrawal from the Apron "C" area (see map of Apron Q.
Apron "C" is Served by Boeing Utilities - Apron "C" comprises approximately 480,933 square feet of
leased area and is served by Boeing utilities, which includes; power, potable water, fire water,
compressed air, gas and phone service. However, Boeing will be discontinuing all utility services to
Apron "C" by December 31, 2003.
Boeing utilities on Apron "C" serve the following major City -owned facilities:
1. One 22,000 square foot hangar
2. One 26,000 square foot avionics building
3. The Airport Maintenance Shop
4. 15 light poles for ramp/security lighting
5. A future public restroom and it's associated sewer pump station
6. Two electric vehicle gates
Airport staff has already severed some Boeing utilities serving Apron "C" (phone service, compressed
air, gas and fire monitoring). However, potable water, fire water and the electrical system serving
Apron "C" remains to be severed.
In order to sever the remaining Boeing utilities and install public utilities to Apron "C", funding will
be needed to complete the conversion. The 2003 Capital Improvement Project amendment titled
"Apron C — Utilities" will fund project management, design and construction. The project is
comprised of two major utility systems, the water system and the power system.
The Water System — The water system serving Apron "C" is currently comprised of two separate
systems, a potable water system and a fire water system.
The potable water system will utilize the existing Boeing potable water main, which will be
transferred to City ownership. The potable water system will require the installation of four City
water meters to serve the Boeing Fuel Farm, the future public restroom, the City Maintenance Shop
and the 800/820 West Perimeter Road buildings.
Currently, the Boeing fire water system provides water to the sprinkler system in three City -owned
buildings. The fire water project will utilize approximately 1,600 linear feet of existing Boeing fire
water main that will be severed from the Boeing fire water system. This section of existing water
main will then be connected into the existing City water system just north of the Boeing fuel farm, and
on the north side of the 820 West Perimeter Road building. The planning level cost estimate for this
work is approximately $35,000, plus $10,000 for project management
The Power System — A new underground power line with transformers will need to be installed along
Apron "C". Initial cost estimates provided by Puget Sound Energy are approximately $130,000 plus
metering, installation of power line from meter to points of service (e.g.: buildings, ramp lighting, etc)
and trenching/restoration costs. The planning level cost estimate for this work is approximately
$241,000, plus $25,000 for project management. With initial design and engineering, project costs
will be refined.
Few Alternatives — City staff worked on various options for remaining on Boeing utilities indefinitely.
For example, staff worked to negotiate a deal with Boeing to place a sub -meter for the electrical
system on Apron "C". In this alternative, the City would then pay Boeing for the electrical usage for
Apron "C". However, because Boeing receives a large commercial discount per kilowatt hour, their
agreement with Puget Sound Energy precludes them from re -selling the discounted electricity.
With respect to the water system, Boeing is extremely concerned of the liability of having the Boeing
fire water system charge the fire sprinkler system in buildings they no longer own. Boeing was not
interested in the City listing Boeing as an "additional insured" entity on the City's insurance policy
covering the Airport. While liability is a concern, City staff speculates that Boeing's desire is to cut
costs and get out of non -core business units (i.e.: utility service to 2"d parties).
H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TATI A1RPORT\03Projects\02Capital Improvement Projects\Apron C Utility Installation\Issue Paper - CIP
Amendment 2-3-03.doc\jdh
Going without utilities to Apron "C" is not an option, since too many City -owned facilities would be
without heat, electricity and water for fire protection. While the cost is significant, the proposed
installation of utilities will economize to the greatest extent possible without installing a lot of extra
(unused) capacity.
cc: Sandra Meyer
Sam Star
H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\AIRPOR_n03Projects\02Capital Improvement Projects\Apron C Utility InstallationUssue Paper - CIP
Amendment 2-3-03.doc\jdh
.� '�� � .� �. � y'„" 'fir., `' ` - ,� �,.u, ��"'�} ✓ ..�
. s �� _i_2 tF•'_i� � �.. , ,. .. .. .. _ .�� R:. ^ �..J.i�«:..-,.qr.'s.,` _ �� .r' .� ... ',.v: ., - ..
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al a:
Submitting Data: Transportation Systems
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works
March 3, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Leslie Lahndt, x-7223
Rob Lockmiller, x-7303
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Perteet Engineering, Inc. 30% Design Contract for
Correspondence..
Strander Boulevard Extension; West Valley Highway
Ordinance .............
(SR-181) to East Valley Road
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits: Issue Paper
Consultant Agreement
Study Sessions......
Six -Year TIP
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept......... X
Refer to Transportation Committee Finance Dept...... X
Other.. . .
Expenditure Required $2,213,349 (over the years 2003, Transfer/Amendment.......
2004, and 2005)
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated......... $747,961
Total Project Budget $ 600,000 for 2003, $1,400,000 City Share of revenue $116,734
will be asked for in 2004 and generated (local match)
$500,000 will be asked for in 2005)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Strander Boulevard Extension; West Valley Highway (SR-181) to East Valley Road Project is an important
east -west trans -south valley connection project targeted at improving access and mobility for the traveling public,
freight, and businesses. When constructed it will provide access to the development at the Boeing Longacres site,
Tukwila Transit Center, and provide a grade separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and
Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks.
Potential funding partners include the City of Tukwila, Sound Transit, Boeing, UPRR and BNSF, and potential
granting agencies include TIB and FAST among other State and Federal sources. Current grants expected in 2004
include $747,961 from TEA-21 to be applied toward this contract. This contract is for 30% design, covering the
Corridor Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), base -mapping, road section, and project phasing. Supplements to
this original agreement will be added to cover the final design of each project phase, of which there are expected to
be at least three. The contract is for $2,213,349 to be completed over twenty-six (26) months from the time of
contract execution. The Transportation Systems Division has budgeted $600,000 in 2003, and is planning to
request budget approval for $1,400,000 in 2004 and $500,000 in 2005, totaling $2,500,000 for design (including
contract and City staff time) of this project in the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 as demonstrated on page 5-7 of the
2003-2008 Six -Year TIP (attached). An additional $2,500,000 has been designated for further and final design of
this project in the year 2006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Transportation staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the consultant
agreement with Perteet Engineering in the amount of $2,213,349 for the Strander Blvd. Extension; West Valley
Highway (SR-181) to East Valley Road Project (Segments 1 and 2).
H: Shared/Division/Transportation/Admin/Agendabill2003/
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 21, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
G' .�A
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman ministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt, extension 7223
SUBJECT: Strander Boulevard Extension
Perteet Engineering, Inc. 30% Design Contract
ISSUE:
Transportation staff is requesting authorization to enter into a consultant contract agreement with Perteet
Engineering, Inc. for the Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street extension, from West Valley Highway
(Tukwila) to the East Valley Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Transportation staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
consultant agreement with Perteet Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $2,213,349 for the Strander
Boulevard Extension; West Valley Highway (SR-181) to East Valley Road Project (Segments 1 and 2).
BACKGROUND:
The City of Renton has completed a planning study for the extension of Strander Boulevard at West
Valley Highway, east to connect with the existing SW 27th Street arterial, and ultimately with an added
access to State Route 167 (SR-167). The new arterial would be grade separated with the Union Pacific
Railroad and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad; provide a primary access point to the proposed
Sounder Commuter Rail Tukwila Station; enhance the existing SW 27th Street arterial through the
Boeing Longacres development, and other business developments along SW 27th Street; and connect
with SR-167 from East Valley Road with northbound off and southbound on ramps. The corridor will be
classified as a principal arterial facilitating east -west vehicular traffic, including transit, high -occupancy
vehicles (HOV's), and trucks in the Renton and Tukwila areas of the Green River Valley. The proposed
four/five-lane arterial will serve as a connector to West Valley Highway (SR-181) and East Valley Road,
as well as an arterial connector to SR-167 from the south. The Strander Boulevard Extension will
provide needed traffic volume balance between South 180th Street/SW 43rd Street, and SW Grady Way.
The added access will provide congestion relief to SR-167 at the South 180th Street/SW 43rd
interchange and along SR-405 from Rainier Avenue to SR-181 (West Valley Highway).
Issue Paper
February 21, 2003
Page 2 of 3
The results of the planning study established a proposed alignment, which the City of Renton has entered
into an agreement with Boeing, granting Renton the necessary right-of-way (ROW) along this alignment
to build the Strander Boulevard Extension.
There are three segments identified as part of the project. These include:
Segment 1 — Limits extend from West Valley Highway to Oakesdale Avenue SW.
Segment 2 — Limits extend from east of Oakesdale Avenue SW to approximately East Valley Road.
Segment 3 — Limits extend from East Valley Road to SR-167 (new HOV direct access interchange to
and from the south)
This contract with Perteet Engineering, Inc. is for $2,213,349 to be completed over 26 months from time
of execution. It will complete the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), base mapping, road section,
and phasing for Segments I and 2 of the corridor. The Transportation Systems Division has budgeted
$600,000 in 2003, and will be requesting a budget of $1,400,000 in 2004 and $500,000 in 2005, totaling
$2,500,000 for design (this contract and City staff time) for this project (TIP #7) in the years 2003, 2004
and 2005. An additional $2,500,000 has been earmarked in the years beyond 2005 for final design of
each of the various phases of this project, of which there are expected to be three. Revenue generated to
date for this contract includes $747,961, a TEA-21 grant, and right-of-way valued at $2.4 M from The
Boeing Company.
Contributions from other funding sources are anticipated from Sound Transit, other agencies (see table
on next page), and Tukwila. It is anticipated that Tukwila will contribute 50% of the local share of the
work being done within Tukwila's boundaries, with the exception of work requested by Tukwila that is
not required to construct Strander Boulevard, but is desired by Tukwila. This contribution is anticipated
to be consistent with a 1986 agreement executed between our respective jurisdictions.
See the following additional information and chart on page 3 on the total estimated cost for Segments I
and I1 as well as overall estimated and secured funding for Segments I and II.
Overall Estimated Costs for Segments I and II
The total cost of Segment 1, between West Valley Highway and Oakesdale Avenue SW is approximately
$46,900,000.
Total cost of Segment 2, between Oakesdale Ave. SW and East Valley Road in Renton is $5,300,000.
This portion lies entirely within Renton and Tukwila is not being asked to share in the cost.
H:\Division.sCIRANSPOR.TAT\ADMiN\Agenda_2003\SEcondl SSUEpaperStranderdesignPeneetwntract, doc
Issue Paper
February 21, 2003
Page 3 of 3
TOTAL IDENTIFIED AND PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES FOR SEGMENTS I AND II
SOURCE
PROPOSED FUNDS
SECURED FUNDS
POTENTIALLY
SECURED
Boeing
$2.4 M
$2.4 M
UPRR
$0.2 M
BNSF
$0.2 M
FAST
$11.75 M
Sound Transit
$11.6 M
$0.2
ISTEA, TEA-21
$.745 M
$.745
Renton
$5 M
$0.6
$4
Tukwila- Tukwila
Portion
$3 M
$0.9
FMSIB
$6.75 M
TIB
$5 M
Other/Unknown
$5.55M
TOTAL
$52.2 M
$3 M
$5.845 M
Attachments
cc: Jay Covington
City Clerk
Leslie Lahndt
Rob Lochmiller
H:\Division.ORANSPQR.TAT \ADMiN\Agenda_2003\SEcondISSUEpaperStranderdeaignPerteetcontract.doc
Local Agency
Standard Consultant
Agreement
Agreement Number
Federal Aid Number
Agreement Type (Choose one)
❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
(� Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate 165.72%
Overhead Cost Method
❑ Actual Cost
❑ Actual Cost Not to Exceed
0 Fixed Rate
Fixed Fee $
❑ Specific Rates Of Pay
❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work
CONSULTANT/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE
Perteet Engineering, Inc.
2707 Colby Avenue Suite 900
Everett, WA 98201
Tel.4251252-7700 Fax.425/339-6018
Project Title And Work Description
Strander Boulevard Extension
West Valley Highway (SR 181) to East
Valley Road
DBE Participation
❑ Yes No %
WBE Participation
❑ Yes No %
Federal ID Number of Social Security Number
91-1505037
Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date
165.72% Services under
❑ Yes ® No Work Order 1 shall
be completed
within 24 months
of notice to
proceed.
Total Amount Authorized $
Management Reserve Fund $_
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this aay or y
Of CITY OF RENTON Washington, hereinafter called the
"AGENCY", and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT'.
Maximum Amount Payable $ 2,213,349
nnno k T.,enn the i nrnl Ar1An(
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it
advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the
PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to
professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to
the AGENCY, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
DOT Form 140-089EF Page ] 5tranaer rsrvu. Ez-11-1-1
City of Renton
Revised 12/99
I
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of
the above -described work and services as herein
defined and necessary to accomplish the
completed work for this PROJECT. The
CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor and
related equipment necessary to conduct and
complete the work as designated elsewhere in this
AGREEMENT.
11
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Scope of Services and project level of effort for
this project is detailed in Exhibit "B" attached
hereto, and by this reference made a part of this
AGREEMENT.
III
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All aspects of coordination of the work of this
AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or
individuals shall receive advance approval by the
AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with
agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated
through the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,
progress and presentation meetings with the
AGENCY or such Federal, Community, State, City
or County officials, groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will
provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to
meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation.
The minimum number of hours or days notice —
required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY
and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made part of this
AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a
monthly progress report, in a form approved by the
AGENCY, that will outline in written and graphical
form the various phases and the order of
performance of the work in sufficient detail so that
the progress of the work can easily be evaluated.
Goals for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
(DBE) and Women Owned Business Enterprises
(WBE) if required shall be shown in the heading of
this AGREEMENT.
All reports, PS&E materials, and other data,
furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY
shall be returned. All designs, drawings,
specifications, documents, and other work products
prepared by the CONSULTANT prior to completion -
or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments
of service for this PROJECT and are property of the
AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others
acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY of any
such instruments of service, not occurring as _t
of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or k
exposure to the CONSULTANT.
IV.
TIME FOR BEGINNING AND
COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in
writing by the AGENCY. All work under this
AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be
extended because of any delays attributable to the
CONSULTANT, but may be extended by the
AGENCY, in the event of a delay attributable to the
AGENCY, or because of unavoidable delays
caused by an act of GOD or governmental actions
or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental agreement
issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the
established completion time.
V
PAYMENT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY
for completed work and services rendered under
this AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "CA"
attached hereto, and by this reference made part of
this AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services
rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete
the work specified in Section U, "Scope of
Services". The CONSULTANT shall conform with
all applicable portions of 48 CFR 31.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 2 biranaer mvu. cmul-1-1
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
VI
SUBCONTRACTING
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items
of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement.
Compensation for this subconsultant work shall be
based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G,
attached hereto and by this reference made a part
of this AGREEMENT.
The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its
maximum amount payable unless a prior written
approval has been issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct
nonsalary costs and fixed fee costs for the
subconsultant shall be substantiated in the same
manner as outlined in Section V. All subcontracts
exceeding $ 10,000 in cost shall contain all
applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the
performance of any work under this AGREEMENT
without prior written permission of the AGENCY.
No permission for subcontracting shall create,
between the AGENCY and subcontractor, any
contract or any other relationship.
VII
EMPLOYMENT
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not
employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract,
and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONSULTANT,
any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or
resulting from the award or making of this contract.
For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY
shall have the right to annul this AGREEMENT
without liability, or in its discretion, to deduct from
the AGREEMENT price or consideration or
otherwise recover the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or
other persons while engaged in the performance of
any work or services required of the CONSULTANT
under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered
employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of
the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may or
might arise under any Workmen's compensation
Act on behalf of said employees or other persons
while so engaged, and any and all claims made by
a third party as a consequence of any act or
omission on the part of the CONSULTANT's
employees or other persons while so engaged on
any of the work or services provided to be rendered
herein, shall be the sole obligation and
responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or
part time basis, or other basis, during the period of
the contract, any professional or technical
personnel who are, or have been, at any time
during the period of the contract, in the employ of
the United States Department of Transportation, the
STATE, or the AGENCY, except regularly retired
employees, without written consent of the public
employer of such person.
Vill
NONDISCRIMINATION
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate
against any client, employee or applicant for
employment or for services because of race, creed,
color, national origin, marital status, sex, age or
handicap except for a bona fide occupational
qualification with regard to, but not limited to the
following: employment upgrading, demotion or
transfer, recruitment or any recruitment advertising
a layoff or terminations, rates of pay or other forms
of compensation, selection for training, rendition of
services. The CONSULTANT understands and
agrees that if it violates this provision, this
AGREEMENT may be terminated by the AGENCY
and further that the CONSULTANT shall be barred
from performing any services for the AGENCY now
or in the future unless a showing is made
satisfactory to the AGENCY that discriminatory
practices have terminated and that recurrence of
such action is unlikely.
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the
CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and
successors in interest agrees as follows:
A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in the
same manner as in Federal -assisted programs
of the Department of Transportation, Title 49,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they
may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter
referred to as the Regulations), which are
herein incorporated by reference and made a
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 3 airanuer tirva. CALU11ZIM I
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
part of this AGREEMENT. The consultant shall
comply with the American Disabilities Act of
1992, as amended.
B. NONDISCRIMINATION: The CONSULTANT,
with regard to the work performed by it during
the AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race, creed color, sex, age, marital
status, national origin or handicap except for a
bona fide occupational qualification in the
selection and retention of subconsultants,
including procurements of materials and leases
of equipment. The CONSULTANT shall not
participate either directly or indirectly in the
discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
Regulations, including employment practices
when the contract covers a program set forth in
Appendix II of the Regulations.
C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS,
INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all
solicitations either by competitive bidding or
negotiation made by the CONSULTANT for
work to be performed under a subcontract,
including procurements of materials or leases of
equipment, each potential subconsultant or
supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT
of the CONSULTANT's obligations under this
AGREEMENT and the Regulations relative to
nondiscrimination on the grounds of race,
creed, color, sex, age, marital status, national
origin and handicap.
D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The
CONSULTANT shall provide all information and
reports required by the Regulations, or
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall
permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as
may be determined by the AGENCY to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations or directives. Where any
information required of the CONSULTANT is in
the exclusive possession of another who fails or
refuses to furnish this information the
CONSULTANT shall so certify to the AGENCY,
or the United States Department of
Transportation as appropriate, and shall set
forth what efforts it has made to obtain the
information.
E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the
event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance
with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such
sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration may determine to be
appropriate, including, but not limited to:
1. Withholding of payments to the
CONSULTANT under the AGREEML
until the CONSULTANT complies, and/or
2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of
the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through (G) in every
subcontract, including procurements of
materials and leases of equipment, unless
exempt by the Regulations or directives issued
pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall
take such action with respect to any
subconsultant or procurement as the AGENCY
or the Federal Highway Administration may
direct as a means of enforcing such provisions
including sanctions for noncompliance;
provided, however, that, in the event a
CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is
threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant
or supplier as a result of such direction, the
CONSULTANT may request the AGENCY to
enter into such litigation to protect the interests
of the AGENCY, and in addition, the
CONSULTANT may request the United S
to enter into such litigation to protect the
interests of the United States.
G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW
49.60.180 and Executive Order number E.O.
77-13 of the Governor of the State of
Washington which prohibits unfair employment
practices.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 4 auanue" wvu. ««1
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
IX
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate
this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten days
written notice to the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the
AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to
the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit F for the
type of Agreement used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed
after ten days following receipt by the
CONSULTANT of the Notice to terminate. If the
accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT
prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total
amount that would be due computed as set forth
herein above, then no final payment shall be due
and the CONSULTANT shall immediately
reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated
by the AGENCY for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, the above formula for payment
shall not apply. In such an event, the amount to be
paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with
consideration given to the actual costs incurred by
the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the
date of termination, the amount of work originally
required which was satisfactorily completed to date
of termination, whether that work is in a form or a
type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of
termination; the cost to the AGENCY of employing
another firm to complete the work required and the
time which maybe required to do so, and other
factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the
work performed at the time of termination. Under
no circumstances shall payment made under this
subsection exceed the amount which would have
been made using the formula set forth in the
previous paragraph.
If it is determined for any reason that the
CONSULTANT was not in default or that the
CONSULTANT's failure to perform is without it or
it's employee's fault or negligence, the termination
shall be deemed to be a termination for the
convenience of the AGENCY in accordance with
the provision of this AGREEMENT.
In the event of the death of any member, partner or
officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, or,
dissolution of the partnership, termination of the
corporation, or disaffiliation of the principally
involved employee, the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work
under the terms of this AGREEMENT, if requested
to do so by the AGENCY. The subsection shall not
be a bar to renegotiation of the AGREEMENT
between the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, if the AGENCY
so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed
in the previous paragraph, should the surviving
members of the CONSULTANT, with the
AGENCY's concurrence, desire to terminate this
AGREEMENT, payment shall be made as set forth
in the second paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY
shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any
remedies of any type it may have against the
CONSULTANT for any breach of this
AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for failure
of the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it
by the AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under
the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of
entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to
any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT..
X
CHANGES OF WORK
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and
revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT
as necessary to correct errors appearing therein,
when required to do so by the AGENCY, without
additional compensation thereof. Should the
AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to
have previously satisfactorily completed work or
parts thereof changed or revised, the
CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as
directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be
considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as
herein provided under Section XIV.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 5 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
XI
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in
connection with the work not disposed of by
AGREEMENT between the CONSULTANT and the
AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the
Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer,
whose decision in the matter shall be final and
binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT,
provided however, that if an action is brought
challenging the Director of Public Works or
AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall
be subject to de novo judicial review.
XII
VENUE, APPLICABLE LAW AND
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
In the event that either party deems it necessary to
institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any
right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the
parties hereto agree that any such action shall be
initiated in the Superior court of the State of
Washington, situated in the county the AGENCY is
located in. The parties hereto agree that all
questions shall be resolved by application of
Washington law and that the parties to such action
shall have the right of appeal from such decisions
of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of
the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT
hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the
Superior court of the State of Washington, situated
in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal,
State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to
the work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This
AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in
accord with the laws of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the
AGENCY and the STATE, and their officers and
employees harmless from and shall process and
defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or
suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from
the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of
its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT
to indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against
and hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE
from claims, demands or suits based solely upon
the conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their
agents, officers and employees and provided
further that if the claims or suits are caused by or
result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the
AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officc id
employees, this indemnity provision with rest, to
(1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2)
the costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of
defending such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid
and enforceable only to the extent of the
CONSULTANT's negligence or the negligence of
the CONSULTANT's agents or employees.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall
be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential
liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's
own employees against the AGENCY and, solely
for the purpose of this indemnification and defense,
the CONSULTANT specifically waives any
immunity under the state industrial insurance law,
Title 51 RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that
this waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to
the provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the
subject of mutual negotiation.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT,
the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration
of construction contracts, if any, on the projec"
Subject to the processing of an acceptable,
supplemental agreement, the CONSULTANT shall
provide on -call assistance to the AGENCY during
contract administration. By providing such
assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no
responsibility for: proper construction techniques,
job site safety, or any construction contractor's
failure to perform its work in accordance with the
contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force
during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as
otherwise required, the following insurance with
companies or through sources approved by the
State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to RCW
48.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 6 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability
insurance as required by the STATE.
B. General commercial liability insurance in an
amount not less than a single limit of one
million and 00/100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00) for
bodily injury, including death and property
damage per occurrence.
C. Any additional insurance requirements are
shown in Exhibit H.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance
and any professional liability insurance secured by
the CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on
all certificates of insurance as an additional insured.
The CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements
required by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY
reserves the right to require complete, certified
copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance
company authorized to do business in the State of
Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a
verification of insurance as outlined above within 14
days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to the
AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be
effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the
AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the
AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable
under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars,
whichever is the greater unless modified by Exhibit
H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's
professional liability to third parties be limited in any
way.
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under
Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully
complied with this section. This remedy is not
exclusive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may
take such other action as is available to them under
other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise
in law.
XIV
EXTRA WORK
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written
order, make changes within the general scope
of the AGREEMENT in the services to be
performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or
decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time
required for, performance of any part of the
work under this AGREEMENT, whether or not
changed by the order, or otherwise affects any
other terms and conditions of the
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an
equitable adjustment in the (1) maximum
amount payable; (2) delivery or completion
schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms
and shall modify the AGREEMENT
accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request for
equitable adjustment '(hereafter referred to as
claim) under this clause within 30 days from the
date of receipt of the written order. However, if
the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it, the
AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim
submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a
dispute under the Disputes clause. However
nothing in this clause shall excuse the CON-
SULTANT from proceeding with the
AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of
paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum
amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall
not be increased or considered to be increased
except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The CONSULTANT shall place his endorsement on
all plans, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by him.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 7 znuanuer rxvu. CAM:[JWUII
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
XVI
FEDERAL AND STATE REVIEW
The Federal Highway Administration and the
Washington State Department of Transportation
shall have the right to participate in the review or
examination of the work in progress.
XVII
CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT
AND THE AGENCY
Attached hereto as Exhibit "A- I", are the
Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency,
Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment,
suspension and other responsibility matters -
primary covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3"
Certification regarding the restrictions of the use of
Federal funds for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4"
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data.
Exhibits "A-3" and "A4" are only required in
Agreements over $100,000.
XVIII
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This document and referenced attachments
contains all covenants, stipulations and provis,
agreed upon by the parties. No agent or
representative of either party has authority to make,
and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable
for, any statement, representation, promise or
agreement not set forth herein. No changes,
amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof
shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed
by the parties as an amendment to this
AGREEMENT.
XIX
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously
executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original having identical
legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify
and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained
in the proposal, and the supporting materials
submitted by the CONSULTANT, and does hereby
accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the
terms and conditions thereof.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above
written.
B
G` By
y
Richard L. Perteet, P.E., Chairman of the Board
Consultant PERTEET ENGINEERING, INC. Agency CITY OF RENTON
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 8 ouanuct UIVU.
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
EXHIBIT A-1
CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT
Project No.
Local Agency CITY OF RENTON
I hereby certify that I am Richard L. Perteet P.E. and duly
authorized representative of the firm of Perteet Engineering Inc. whose address is 2707
Colby Avenue Suite 900 Everett Washington 98201 and that neither I nor the above firm I here
represent has:
a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration,
any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above
CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure this contract.
b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services
of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract.
c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working
solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind
for, or in connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if
any):
I further certify that the firm I hereby represent is authorized to do business in the State.of Washington and
that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the Board of Professional Registration.
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the State Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection.with this contract
involving participation of Federal aid funds and is sub' ct to plicable State and Federal laws, both
criminal and civil.
1-Z3
Date Signature
CERTIFICATION OF AGENCY OFFICIAL
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of CITY OF RENTON
Washington and that the above consulting firm or his representative has not been required, directly or
indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to:
a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
b) Pay or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or
consideration of any kind, except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid
highway funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date
Signature
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 9 5trancer biva. tmension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
EXHIBIT A-2
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY
MATTERS -PRIMARY COVERED TRANSACTIONS
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or
contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, or receiving stolen property;
c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 1.b. of
this certification; and
d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): Perteet Engineering, Inc.
(Date) Chairman of the Board or Authorized Official of Consultant
(Signature)
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 10 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
EXHIBIT A-3
CERTIFICATION REGARDING THE RESTRICTIONS
OF THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and'submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a
member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress
in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of
any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in
connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with
its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 3 1, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required,
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and
that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm): Perteet Engineering, Inc.
(Date) Chairman of the Board or Authorized Official of Consultant
(Signature)
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 11 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
EXHIBIT A-4
CERTIFICATE OF CURRENT COST OR PRICING DATA
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section
15.801 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.804-2)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of * are accurate, complete, and current as of
**. This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward
pricing rate agreements between the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm Perteet Engineering Inc
Name Richard L. Perteet P.E.
Title Chairman of the Board
Date of Execution*** Z
• Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.)
** Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
*** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 12 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
Exhibit `B"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY OF RENTON
Strander Boulevard Extension
WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (SR 181) TO EAST VALLEY ROAD
INTRODUCTION
The project will construct a new east -west arterial roadway between West Valley Highway and Oakesdale
Boulevard, and widen existing 27th Street between Oakesdale Boulevard and East Valley Road. The
completed project will provide a new arterial roadway connection that will connect the Cities of Renton
and Tukwila, and provide significant congestion relief to existing arterials. The new road will provide
direct access to the new Tukwila Station, a multi -modal center being developed immediately north of the
new alignment, and to the Boeing Longacres site. The eventual direct HOV connections to southbound SR
167 will provide significant advantages to HOV and transit usage. By crossing under the UPRR and BNSF
railroads, the new arterial will provide significant benefits to both freight mobility and to general motorists.
GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
This agreement includes design, environmental, and right-of-way plan and acquisition services for the
Strander Boulevard / SW 27th Street project between West Valley Highway (SR 181) and East Valley
Road. Professional services to be supplied cover both Segment 1 (Strander Boulevard extension between
SR 181 and Oakesdale Avenue) and Segment 2 (27th Street SW between Oakesdale Avenue and East
Valley Road) as shown in the "Project Definition Report" prepared in February, 2002. At the option of the
City, the Consultant may be asked to provide construction management services for some or all of the
construction contracts.
The connection of Strander Boulevard / SW 271h Street to SR 167 is not included in this project design nor
environmental analysis. That connection will be part of the WSDOT evaluation of the I-405 corridor
projects. However, the effect of this proposed direct HOV connection on future traffic routing and volumes
will be considered in the traffic analysis for this project, and the future geometries of that connection will
be a consideration when designing the intersection of SW 27th Street with East Valley Road.
The Project Definition Report selected alternative UN2B as the preferred alternative for Segment 1
(relocation of the UPRR tracks parallel to the existing BNSF tracks, and construction of new roadway and
railroad undercrossings), and alternative GP2 (five lane arterial section) as the preferred alternative for
Segment 2. It is the intent of this agreement that detailed environmental and engineering services will be
provided to implement those decisions.
Federal funds will be used in the planning, design, and/or construction of the project. Accordingly, the
procedures outlined in the Local Agency Guidelines (LAG manual) will be used during development of the
project.
Construction staging opportunities will be identified during the Preliminary Design phase of the agreement.
The number of construction contracts to be prepared for the construction of the total improvements will be
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 13 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
determined by the City. At this time, it is apparent that there may be as many as five separate construction
contracts that will be driven by the availability of project funding.
This project has been scoped and budgeted to include preparation of a NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). During the conduct of EIS scoping, agency coordination, and project investigations, it
may be determined that a NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) would be the appropriate level of
environmental documentation. If this is the case, an amendment will be made to this Agreement to ,reflect
the need for less complex environmental documentation.
It is intended that the environmental document prepared for this project will also serve the function of a
project design report.
The improvements will require participation from the cities of Renton and Tukwila, Sound Transit, the
Boeing Company, WSDOT, UPRR, and BNSF. The consultant will assist the City in development of
Memorandums of Agreement (MOA) or Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) between these parties if
needed to ensure project success. The consultant will actively participate in ongoing discussions, decisions,
and agreements between the City and the above participants.
To allow flexibility, the services under this agreement will be accomplished under four separate Work
Orders:
Work Order 1 - Preliminary Design of Segments 1 and 2 (30% design level), and preparation of
NEPA/SEPA EIS
Work Order 2 - Preparation of PS&E, permit applications, and Biological Assessments for each of
the construction stages identified during the Preliminary Design phase, (requires
supplement).
Work Order 3 - Right-of-way plan preparation, appraisals, and acquisition (requires supplement)
Work Order 4 - Services during construction (optional service that requires supplement)
The fee for services for preparation of PS&E (construction contract documents) will be negotiated during
or following completion of the preliminary design phase when the exact nature of each construction
contract has been identified, and will be included as a supplement to this agreement.
Services for right-of-way plan preparation, appraisal, and acquisition will be negotiated when the project
design is sufficiently advanced to allow the extent of right-of-way needs to be accurately determined.
Services during construction are an optional element at the discretion of the City, and will be negotiated
during or following the completion of the project design when these elements of the work can be more
accurately identified, and will be included as a supplement to this agreement.
WORK ORDER 1 — PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF SEGMENTS 1 AND 2, AND PREPARATION
OF NEPA/SEPA EIS
1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Schedule and coordinate with consultant and subconsultant personnel and equipment.
1.2 Coordinate and attend Stakeholder Committee meetings, and prepare meeting minutes.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 14 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
1.3 Coordinate and attend Steering Committee meetings, and prepare meeting minutes. It is
anticipated that the Steering Committee will be made up of the City of Renton Administrator
of Planning/ Building/ Public Works; City of Renton Administrator of Economic
Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning; City of Renton Director of
Transportation Systems; City of Tukwila Director of the Department of Public Works, and
the City of Tukwila Director of the Department of Community Development. This
committee will give general policy direction to the project team. It is anticipated that
steering committee meetings will occur at 4 to 6 week intervals.
1.4 Prepare project charter, detailed work plan, and change management procedure.
1.5 Prepare, monitor, and update project schedule. Schedule will be developed using MS
Project 2000. Monitor project budget.
1.6 Prepare monthly billings, progress reports, and updated monthly project schedule.
1.7 Attend bi-weekly coordination/discussion meetings with key City staff, and attend other
meetings as needed. Prepare and distribute meeting minutes.
1.8 Maintain regular contact with the City's Project Manager via informal meetings, telephone
discussions, and electronic mail.
1.9 Maintain a web based (or equivalent) project management / coordination system that will
allow all team members access to up-to-date project files.
1.10 Obtain, with assistance from the City, rights of entry necessary for surveys, geotechnical
studies, and wetland delineations.
2.0 PROJECT COORDINATION/PLANNING
This element of the work includes efforts to coordinate the project development with all known project
stakeholders. Known key stakeholders include the City of Renton, the City of Tukwila, Sound Transit,
BNSF Railroad, Union Pacific Railroad, and the Boeing Company. King County and WSDOT also have
interest in the project, as do various public and private utilities.
2.1 Facilitate a one-half day partnering session to be attended by all key project stakeholders.
The purpose of this meeting is to determine issues, procedures, and processes to be followed
in development of the project.
2.2 Arrange and facilitate technical design charrettes with the two operating railroads. The
charrettes will focus on development of alternative solutions to the design and
environmental issues along the project.
2.3 Assist the City in coordination with the key stakeholders along the route.
2.4 The community information program will be run as part of the NEPA/SEPA EIS process. It
is not anticipated that additional public meetings will be required. The Consultant will
provide presentation graphics and questionnaires for these public meetings. The City will
provide all advertisements, mailings and will arrange for meeting rooms and refreshments as
necessary.
2.5 Meet individually with representatives of the key stakeholders, and with representatives of
each of the developed private properties along 27th Street to keep them informed of the
project progress.
2.6 Present the project to the City Council or appropriate Council committee at least two times
during the project development.
2.7 Coordinate with various public and private utilities along the route. Prepare and maintain
utility coordination checklist. Coordinate and attend utility meetings. Review utility
records and identify utility conflicts.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 15 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
2.8 Other coordination and planning activities as needed to fulfill the requirements of this
agreement, including coordination with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) that will be
established as part of the NEPA EIS work
3.0 PREPARE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDINC
Improvements will require participation from the cities of Renton and Tukwila, Sound Transit, WSDOT,
UPRR, and BNSF. A single or series of Memorandums of Agreement (MOA) or Memorandums of
Understanding (MOU) may be needed between the cities of Renton and Tukwila, Sound Transit, WSDOT,
UPRR, and BNSF to assure coordination and commitment to roles and responsibilities. These documents
may be developed as tiered MOA's or MOU's to assure that initial commitments are agreed upon prior to
completion of the final design or project phasing.
3.1 COORDINATION MEETINGS
The Consultant will assist the City in coordinating with the participating agencies, and will attend a
total of four meetings that have a primary purpose of preparing a MOA or MOU. The Consultant
will facilitate the meeting, prepare the agenda and presentation materials, and provide meeting notes
that include action items for resolution.
3.2 PREPARE DRAFT MOA/MOU
The Consultant will prepare up to two drafts and one pre -final MOA's or MOD's for review by the
City and the participating agencies. The draft documents will be prepared for discussion and r - '
�w
at the coordination meetings.
3.3 PREPARE FINAL MOA/MOU
The Consultant will prepare the final MOA's or MOU's with the participating agencies based on
review comments. Sufficient copies will be prepared to assure that each signatory agency will have
an original of their MOA or MOU.
3.4 PREPARE A COMMITMENT FILE
At completion of the Phase I work, and upon completion of the MOA's or MOU's, the Consultant
will prepare a Commitment File to be included in the project documentation that outlines all
commitments contained in the memorandums.
4.0 NEPAJSEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Since state, local, and federal permits and approvals, as well as funding, will be used for this project,
environmental documentation that complies with state and federal regulations will be required. A single
environmental impact statement (EIS) will be prepared that meets the requirements of both the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Th
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 16 litranaer biva. Lmension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
following work elements describe the tasks necessary to prepare the EIS according to WSDOT's 2001
Environmental Procedures Manual. This work will cover the project corridor as previously defined in
the General Scope of Services for this project.
4.1 EIS FRAMEWORK
4.1.1 Prepare Statement of Purpose and Need for Action
The Consultant will coordinate with the City to prepare a Statement of Purpose and Need for
the EIS. The Statement of Purpose and Need will identify the proposed action, concisely
identify and characterize the specific problems that the proposed action is intended to
address, and demonstrate why the study limits and study area boundaries are logical.
The revised Statement of Purpose and Need will be reviewed once by the City and other
agencies. Review comments will be consolidated into a single document by the City, and
revisions to the draft Statement of Purpose and Need will be incorporated by the Consultant
into a final Statement of Purpose and Need for inclusion in the EIS. It is anticipated that
other agencies such as the City of Tukwila, WSDOT, and FHWA may also review this and
other environmental products.
4.1.2 Establish Interdisciplinary Team (IDT)
In this Work Element an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will be established to function in an
advisory capacity and provide objective guidance and recommendations concerning the
proposed action and environmental review process in accordance with requirements in the
Local Agency Guidelines (LAG Manual) for preparation of a NEPA EIS. The City will
identify and appoint members of the IDT.
4.1.3 Prepare and Issue Notice of Intent and Determination of Significance
The Consultant will assist the City in preparation of the Notice of Intent and the
Determination of Significance to initiate the NEPA and SEPA EIS processes, respectively.
4.2 EIS SCOPING
4.2.1 Conduct Agency Scoping Meeting
The Consultant will arrange, prepare for, and conduct one agency Scoping meeting. It will
be held on a convenient day of the week for up to two hours at Renton City Hall. The
meeting format is expected to include a presentation by the Consultant covering the
proposed action and project alternatives. This presentation will be followed by an informal
question and answer period.
Copies of the project information packet and meeting agenda will be sent to federal, State,
and local agencies; affected jurisdictions; and local officials by the Consultant prior to the
scoping meeting. The City will be responsible for publication of legal meeting notices.
Text of these notices will be supplied by the Consultant.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 17 5trancer mvo. extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
The Consultant also will be responsible for the following in connection with the agency
scoping meeting:
• Coordinate scheduling of the meeting with City;
• Arrange for set-up and take -down of displays provided at the meeting location.
The Consultant will prepare minutes of the agency scoping meeting.
The Consultant will provide preparation of materials for one agency scoping meeting;
arrangement of and attendance at agency scoping meeting; 20 copies of the information
packet and fact sheet; sign -in sheets; copies of all fact sheets, handouts, mailings,
announcements, and other written information provided; meeting minutes summarizing of
key issues, pertinent information, and comments received from the agencies and
jurisdictions; and a list of agencies that attended or were consulted.
4.2.2 Conduct One Public, Scoping Meeting
The Consultant will arrange, prepare for, and conduct one open house scoping meeting for
the general public. It will be conducted on a convenient day of the week for up to four hours
at a location in the project vicinity. It is assumed that scoping meetings will be held at City
Hall. It is anticipated that the open house will be held in a space that affords room for
individual stations corresponding to key subject areas. These may include, but are not
limited to, greeting/sign-in/room arrangement; proposed action and project alternatives.
One or more members of the Consultant team will staff each station. The Consultant also
will assist the City with media coverage at the open house. City staff will be in attendai
to assist with presentations, staff specific stations, respond to inquiries concerning other
nearby projects of the City, and answer other general questions consistent with their area of
expertise or responsibility. Brief presentations may be made at specific intervals (such as on
the half-hour) to welcome attendees, provide a general overview of the open house, and
summarize the proposed action and environmental process.
The Consultant will prepare handouts, fact sheets, and response forms, and will print and
assemble 100 copies. Up to 10 display boards will be prepared that support the scoping
meeting agenda.
The City will be responsible for meeting room rental fees and publication of legal meeting
notices. Notice of the public open house will include publication in newspapers of local and
regional circulation, and other available means of communication.
The Consultant will be responsible for the following in connection with the public scoping
meeting:
• Coordinate scheduling of the meetings with the City;
• Brief staff at the public open house on assignments, media contacts, recording public
comments, and encouraging use of response forms;
• Arrange for set-up and take -down of displays provided at the meeting location;
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 18 )LraJJUUJ orvU. cxLci lawn
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
• Orient greeters to guide the public and assist the staff; and
• Debrief staff at the meetings in order to capture verbal comments received.
The Consultant will compile and summarize both the verbal and written comments received
from the public.
The Consultant will prepare and provide materials for the public scoping meeting;
arrangement of and attendance at the scoping meeting; preparation of up to 10 display
boards; 100 copies of the public handouts, fact sheet, and response form; sign -in sheets of all
fact sheets, handouts, mailings, announcements, and other written information provided;
summaries of key issues, pertinent information, and comments received from the public; and
a list of members of the public who attended.
4.2.3 Prepare Final Study Plan
The Consultant will prepare a draft and final Study Plan. This plan will incorporate the
following: agency and/or EDT discipline issues and concerns; revisions to the scope of the
project and alternatives; revisions to the scope and level of analysis for each discipline
study; and any changes in the project schedule. The draft Study Plan will be reviewed once
by the IDT and the City. The final Study Plan will be prepared once by the Consultant, and
will be submitted for approval by the IDT and the City.
4.3 DISCIPLINE STUDIES
4.3.1 Prepare Descriptions of Alternatives
The Consultant will prepare descriptions of the project alternatives advanced into the EIS as
necessary to fulfill requirements for the EIS under NEPA and SEPA. This section also will
discuss why this represents a range of reasonable alternatives, and will identify other
alternatives that have been eliminated from detailed study. It is assumed here that up to
three alternatives will be advanced for detailed study in the EIS, including a No Action
Alternative.
The draft description of the alternatives will be reviewed once by the.City. Review
comments of the City will be combined into a single document by the City, and the draft
Study Plan will be revised once by the Consultant into a final description of the alternatives
for inclusion in the EIS.
4.3.2 Preparation of Discipline Reports
This task will develop the necessary information to determine the feasibility of each
alternative advanced for detailed study in the EIS, and to describe the relative performance
and environmental consequences of each alternative at the level of detail needed to identify
meaningful differences in their effectiveness, environmental consequences, and
opportunities for mitigation of adverse impacts. The discipline reports prepared as part of
this task will provide the basis for preparation of the Draft EIS.
Two action alternatives plus the required No Action Alternative are assumed to be advanced
for more detailed evaluation in the Draft EIS. All alternatives will be evaluated at a similar
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 19 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
level of detail.
Discipline reports will be prepared in a manner that allows the pertinent information to be
transferred and summarized directly into the Draft EIS. For each expertise report, the
Consultant will summarize the results of coordination with Federal, State, City, and loc
agencies; describe the methodology used to assess impacts; identify the affected
environment; predict and analyze the construction -related (short-term) and operational
(long-term) impacts (including direct, indirect, and cumulative) of alternative
implementation; and identify opportunities and measures for mitigating significant adverse
impacts.
It is assumed that draft discipline reports will be prepared for air quality; noise; soils and
geology; groundwater; surface water quality and quantity; wetlands; biological resources,
including plants, animals, fish, and threatened and endangered species; hazardous materials;
traffic and transportation; land use, zoning, and plans and policies; socioeconomic impacts;
recreation and Section 4(f) resources; historic, cultural, and archaeological resources; visual
quality; utilities and public services; and energy. Since no one resides in the project area,
environmental justice will not be addressed.
The draft discipline reports will be reviewed for format, style, clarity, and consistency prior
to review by the City. The Consultant's senior experts will review the documents for
substantive content and technical accuracy. Ten copies of each draft discipline report will
be provided for review by the City using a format and table of contents approved in advance
by the City. Each draft discipline report will be reviewed once by the City. Review
comments of the City will be combined into a single document for each discipline report for
delivery to the City, and each discipline report will be revised once by the Consultant int^ k
final discipline report suitable for appending to the EIS. Ten copies of each final discip
report will be delivered to the City.
The Consultant will provide ten copies of each draft and 10 copies of each final expertise
report for air quality; noise; soils and geology; groundwater; surface water quality and.
quantity; wetlands; biological resources, including plants, animals, fish, and threatened and
endangered species; hazardous materials; traffic and transportation; land use, zoning, and
plans and policies; socioeconomic impacts; recreation and Section 4(f) resources; historic,
cultural, and archaeological resources; visual quality; utilities and public services; and
energy. Since no one lives in the project area, environmental justice will not be addressed.
4.3.2(1) Geology and Soils
Subsurface data collected for the preliminary engineering analysis will be used as a basis for
preparing the soils and geology discipline report. No additional borings will be drilled
specifically for the Draft EIS. The discipline report will include an existing,conditions
section that will describe subsurface conditions, project geology, tectonics and seismicity,
geologic hazards, and sensitive areas. The discipline report will also include a discussion of
geotechnical impacts in relation to each element of the affected environment (direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts) as well as impacts during construction. Mitigation
measures will be proposed to offset potential impacts.
4.3.2(2) Air Quality
The project area will be visited to collect measurements of the physical geometry of the
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 20 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
existing intersections to be studied and to survey the nearby area for sensitive air quality
receptors. The air quality analysis will provide a NEPA/SEPA level conformity review of
potential impacts associated with the proposed alternatives.
Air quality modeling for up to four existing signalized intersections for Existing Conditions,
and future No Build, and up to two additional intersections for the Build configuration in
both the proj ect's opening and design years. If necessary, a quantitative analysis of potential
air quality mitigation measures at up to four intersections will be performed. The air quality
impact and mitigation analysis will be documented in a WSDOT-format discipline report.
Additionally required backup information (e.g., modeling files) will be supplied directly on
CD.
4.3.2(3) Surface Water Quantity and Quality
The discipline report will identify Springbrook Creek and other rivers and streams in the
study area that may be affected by the project. As part of the Existing Conditions, a
description of their general hydrologic characteristics and overall water quality will be
prepared. The water quality analysis will identify streams that are on the Section 303(d) list
and describe their limiting parameters. Important aquatic resources will be determined from
available literature and information obtained from resource agencies.
Current Federal, State, and local stormwater management requirements will be identified
that would apply to each of the alternatives. Potential stormwater quantity and quality
treatment measures that may be used for each alternative will be identified. Meetings will
be conducted with Tukwila and Renton local storm -water regulatory agencies and with
selected resource agencies. Emphasis will be placed upon determining stormwater treatment
requirements that are realistically foreseeable as a result of changing stormwater
management regulations. Opportunities for retrofit of existing facilities to improve water
quality and runoff will be assessed and identified.
Long-term annual pollutant loads to the major rivers and lakes will be estimated using the
methods described in the WSDOT Highway Water Quality Manual (WSDOT, 1988). Those
methods rely on predictions of average daily traffic, determinations of highway length and
change in impervious surfaces, and relationships established by long-term highway runoff
studies in Washington. No flow or water quality data will be collected.
Cumulative effects on water quality will consider the potential for additional sediment
delivery based on information in existing watershed. General secondary and/or cumulative
impacts of each of the alternatives on surface waters will be identified consistent with land
use changes identified in the Land Use Discipline Report.
Potential mitigation measures for stormwater quantity and quality impacts will be identified,
as appropriate.
4.3.2(4) Floodplains
Existing data describing floodplains will be identified and collected from a variety of
jurisdictions. Sources of information include National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
maps, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps, the City's new floodplain
mapping, and other City, county, or city floodplain or floodway information. For each
alternative, areas lying within both floodways and 100-year floodplains will be plotted to
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 21 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
show areas of potential impact. Mitigation measures, such as compensatory storage, will be
identified where impacts occur.
4.3.2(5) Groundwater
Subsurface data collected for the preliminary engineering analysis will be used as a basi
preparing the groundwater discipline report. The discipline report will include an existing
conditions section that will describe subsurface conditions, the groundwater flow regime and
current water use and users. The discipline report will also include a discussion of
hydrogeological impacts in relation to each element of the affected environment (direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts) as well as impacts during construction. Mitigation
measures will be proposed to offset potential impacts.
4.3.2(6) Fisheries, Wildlife, and Vegetation
Upland Vegetation and Wildlife
The discipline report for upland vegetation and wildlife will be based on the Washington
State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Wetland/Biology Discipline Report
checklist. The report will identify documented sensitive wildlife, plant, and habitat
occurrence from existing sources including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitats and Species program,
Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Information System, and
local jurisdiction's inventories. The analysis will address federal and state -listed threatened
and endangered plants and animals, as well as other species of special concern that could be
present in the analysis area. Areas affected under each alternative will be identified and
estimated using CADD generated maps from preliminary engineering designs.
The methods of the analysis, existing conditions, and projected impacts from each
alternative in an upland vegetation and wildlife will be included in the discipline report.
report will identify direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on wildlife and terrestrial habitat.
The report will identify opportunities to mitigate potential significant impacts and will
compare impacts between the alternatives. The report will identify any required permits
from federal, state, or local agencies. The discipline report will be revised once based on
comments received from the reviewers coordinated by the City's project manager.
Fisheries
The discipline report on fisheries will describe major stream systems in the report. Stream
conditions in the project area will be evaluated using information available in published
sources, project maps and databases, data available from resource agencies, and information
collected during an on -site investigation. The affected environment section will include
description of watersheds, stream systems, fish species presence, status of salmonid (salmon
and trout) species/stocks, and general fish habitat conditions and limitations. The report will
focus primarily on sahnonids, but will also address other fish species that are protected or of
concern. The report will also provide the information for preparation of the Biological
Assessment in the appropriate format. As each project element is developed, this
information will need to be updated with current, location -specific information from NOAA
Fisheries, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Washington State Department of Fish and
Wildlife databases.
The discipline report will evaluate all project alternatives for their relative potential impa,t
on fish populations. Potential impacts will be assessed at a level of detail matching that
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 22 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
the alternative plans and descriptions. The assessment will include direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects on fish and aquatic systems. Opportunities to implement mitigation
measures to avoid and reduce impacts to fish and aquatic habitat will be identified.
Required permits from federal, state, and local agencies will be identified. The discipline
report will be revised once based on comments received from the reviewers coordinated by
the City's project manager.
4.3.2(7) Wetlands
The discipline report on wetlands will be based on the Washington State Department of
Transportation's (WSDOT) Wetland/Biology Discipline Report checklist. Preliminary
identification of on site wetlands will be based on review of the USFWS National Wetland
Inventory, DNR Natural Heritage Information System, local jurisdiction wetland
inventories, and the Strander Boulevard/SW 27`h Street Corridor Improvements Draft
Project Definition Report. Wetland boundaries will be delineated during an on site
investigation utilizing methods described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' 1987
Manual and the Department of Ecology's 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification
and Delineation Manual. A wetland functional assessment will be performed.
For each alternative, total areas of wetland impact will be calculated based on design
drawings per alternative and the surveyed and mapped boundaries of the delineated
wetlands. For each alternative, potential required permits will be identified. The discipline
report will be revised once based on comments received from the reviewers coordinated by
the City's project manager.
4.3.2(8) Energy
A discussion of energy consumption will be prepared that focuses on the potential energy
savings that may accrue from development of the project alternatives. Construction and
secondary and cumulative energy consumption will be estimated and documented using
typical consumption information in the DEIS.
4.3.2(9) Noise
The Consultant will visit the project area to verify the lack of sensitive noise receivers.
Because of the absence of sensitive receptors (residential areas, schools, hospitals, etc.) no
noise modeling is proposed.
The noise analysis will be documented in a WSDOT-format discipline report, and
additionally required backup information (e.g., modeling files) will be provided directly on
CD. Based on the existing conditions along the route, it is assumed that no noise mitigation
measures will be necessary to construct the project.
4.3.2(10) Hazardous Materials and Wastes
The hazardous materials and wastes review will consist of research of historical sources and
environmental agency records. Historical sources will include historical aerial photographs
available from WSDOT archives and historical fire insurance maps (Sanborn maps), where
available, for selected portions of the corridors. Environmental agency records to be re-
viewed will include, subject to availability, the following databases:
• Federal NPL Site List and CERCLIS List
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 23 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
• Federal RCRA TSD Facilities List
• Federal RCRA TSD Generators List
• Federal ERNS List
• Washington State's Lists of Hazardous Waste Sites Identified for Investigation or
Remediation (NPL and CERCLIS Equivalents)
• Washington State's Landfill or Solid Waste Site Lists
• Washington State's Leaking UST Lists
• Washington State's Registered UST Lists
To complete the review of these records, the services of a professional environmental data
retrieval service will be used.
Limited site reconnaissance of sections of the corridor where historical or environmental
agency records indicate the possible presence of hazardous wastes or hazardous substances,
including petroleum products, will be performed. The site reconnaissance will not include
any subsurface investigations or sampling of environmental media. Specific hazardous
material surveys will not be performed. Locations within identified alternative alignments
where possible hazardous building materials are present will be noted. Properties with
identified or potential hazardous wastes or hazardous substances, including petroleum
products, that exceed de minimis quantities, will be displayed in map form. If the presence
of potential hazardous material sites is identified during site reconnaissance or during
geotechnical investigations, a work scope and budget modification will be needed to
evaluate this information.
Short- and long-term impacts related to conditions identified by the review will be
identified. Mitigation measures for these impacts will also be identified.
4.3.2(11) Land Use
Substantial reliance will be placed on existing digital mapped land uses from the City of
Renton and King County GIS and from aerial photography. The City of Renton and
Tukwila's current zoning and comprehensive land use plan and PSRC's forecasts of future
land use within the analysis area will be used to discuss existing land use and anticipated
changes in land use.
Current and anticipated trends in land use and development will be identified. Pressures for
change in land use, the timing and density of development, and population distribution, as
well as other indirect and cumulative impacts within the study area will be discussed for
each alternative. The expectation is that implementation of the project may result in more
rapid land use change in the vicinity.
In situations where right-of-way will be required for an alternative, land use impacts on
individual parcels will be discussed.
4.3.2(12) Land Use Plans and Policies
An analysis of the consistency of the project with adopted federal, state, and local land use
plans will be prepared. The analysis will be included in a discipline report prepared by
Perteet for land use. A review, evaluation, and discussion of applicable adopted GMA
comprehensive plans for the Cities of Renton and Tukwila will be undertaken. In addition
DOT Form 140-089EF
Revised 12/99
Page 24
Strander Blvd. Extension
City of Renton
to reviewing the policies in the comprehensive plans, the Consultant will also review the
following implementation plans: transportation, recreation, natural resources, capital
facilities, utilities, community services, and economic development will also be reviewed
along with Destination 2030, the regional transportation plan.
The consistency of the Draft EIS alternatives with these applicable plans and policies will be
evaluated and discussed. Potential inconsistencies of the alternatives with adopted plans and
policies, if any, will be identified and evaluated. The analysis will be revised once based on
comments received from the reviewers coordinated by the project manager.
4.3.2(13) Recreation and Section 4(0 and 6(fi Resources
Mapped existing and planned publicly owned parks, trails, and recreational facilities;
significant privately owned recreational facilities; and known Section 4(f) and Section 6(0
resources (involves IAC funds) will be identified from local park and recreation
comprehensive plans. Potentially affected resources and the areas of effect will be identified
and estimated. Potential construction and operational impacts on parks and recreation
facilities will be discussed for each alternative. This discipline report and analyses will
focus on the Interurban and Springbrook Valley Trails.
Preparation of a Section 4(f) Evaluation under Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act and an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under Section 6(f) of
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, if required, will be consistent with the
analysis provided in the EIS and be prepared as part of this discipline report.
4.3.2(14) Historical and.Cultural Resources
The cultural resources assessment would address archaeological resources, historic buildings
and structures, and traditional cultural places, using four tasks: archival review,
consultation, field reconnaissance, and discipline report preparation. This phase is an
identification effort only; any archaeological resources and/or traditional cultural places that
are identified that may be significant would need to be evaluated in a second phase if they
could not be avoided. If a significant cultural resource cannot be avoided, mitigation would
need to be developed by a professional archaeologist in consultation with the Washington
State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP), City of Renton,, and the
Muckleshoot and Duwamish Tribes.
The assessment of historic buildings and structures would include inventory of a maximum
of two buildings or structures. If other buildings and structures are identified through
archival review, recommendations would be extended for further inventory and/or
evaluation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
Archival Review: Pertinent literature on the archaeology, ethnography, and history of the
project areas would be reviewed to determine the existence of archaeological sites and to
determine the probability for archaeological resources and traditional cultural places in the
project area. Previous cultural resources studies, historic buildings and structures
inventories, ethnographies, local histories, historic maps, as well as records held by the
OAHP and King County Office of Cultural Resources would be consulted.
Agency/Tribal Consultation: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and Duwamish Tribe would be
contacted for information the Tribe may have on traditional cultural use and historic Indian
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 25 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
use of the project area. The Tribes would be contacted through letter and telephone. The
City of Renton may choose to send correspondence that has been prepared on their
letterhead to meet obligations for government -to -government relations. The OAHP would be
consulted regarding potential significance of archaeological sites that may be identified.
Field Reconnaissance: A systematic field reconnaissance would be conducted to identify
previously recorded and/or unrecorded archaeological sites for the proposed project where
ground disturbing activities are expected to take place. Field reconnaissance would consist
of the traverse of pedestrian transects at varying intervals, depending on terrain throughout
the proposed project area. Limited shovel probes (digging a hole with a shovel) would be
excavated along the transects and shovel probes would be screened using 1/8 " mesh in high
probability areas and in soil matrices too dense to identify small chipping debris.
All new sites would be mapped, photographed, and recorded on Washington State .
Archeological Inventory forms and submitted to the OAHP for Smithsonian numbers. A
historian from Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services will visit the project area to
determine if buildings and structures over 50 years old and potentially significant need to be
inventoried. If necessary, LAAS would complete an inventory form for a maximum of two
buildings or structures.
Rights -of -entry would be provided by the City of Renton. If the project area is not readily
identifiable using maps, knowledgeable personnel regarding project area boundaries may be
asked to accompany the archaeologist in the field.
Discipline Report: A discipline report would be prepared; describing cultural resources
identified in the project area, which meets state and federal standards for reporting as
outlined in the guidelines provided by the State Office of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation, and is consistent with the WSDOT Procedures Manual. The report would
include summary background information appropriate to a cultural resources assessment of
the project area, including environment, previous cultural resources studies,
ethnography/ethnohistory, and history; listing of historic buildings and structures that may
be affected by the project, methodology and results of the investigation, and a map of
located archaeological sites and historic buildings and structures.
Recommendations would be extended for any archaeological sites that may be significant or
historic buildings and structures that require inventorying or may be significant.
4.3.2(1 S) Socioeconomic
The Affected Environment description will identify and describe development patterns
along the project corridor, demographics, community character, and community/social
resources. The description will be based on existing documentation, Census data, and
personal interviews with local government staff. PSRC data for Forecast and Analysis Zones
and data from other existing sources will be used to describe baseline conditions and trends
in population, housing, employment, development, and level of economic activity within the
study area.
The environmental consequences analysis will assess potential direct and indirect impacts on
the area during construction and operation. Impacts will be described by project segment,
and will include discussion of such potential impacts as changes in quality of life, barrier
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 26 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
social interaction, impacts to community resources, and effects on safety and security. The
Mitigation discussion will identify measures to minimize the identified social/neighborhood
impacts. Consultation with relevant local government staff will occur to assist in the
identification of reasonable and acceptable mitigation measures.
This scope of work does not include analysis of recreation facilities, public services, or
pedestrian and bicyclist facilities, which being analyzed in other discipline studies.
4.3.2(16) Environmental Justice
Since no one lives in the project area, environmental justice will not be addressed.
4.3.2(17) Visual, Light, and Glare
Definition of area of visual impact: Perteet will assess and define the limits of the area of
visual impact for the proposed project. The proposed project is considered to be a new five -
lane roadway section, with adjacent sidewalks and planting strips for low landscaping and
trees. In addition to this surface roadway, the visual features include bridge and retainage
structures as the roadway passes under the existing railroad tracks. The extent of the
"visual field" of the affected area (both in terms of view from the road and views form the
surrounding area to the new roadway facility) will be estimated and mapped. As part of the
visual sensitivity analysis, Perteet will establish key viewpoints within the impacted area to
the proposed roadway and provide photographs demonstrating the existing view qualities. In
addition to identifying and mapping existing buildings that contain observers, Perteet will
identify future development planned or projected within the impact area.
Description of existing visual quality: Within the impacted area, Perteet will describe the
existing built context as well as the natural landforms and vegetation and other existing
visual features such as railroad facilities and apparatus. The visual character of the
adjacent, connecting streets will be described to establish an experiential context for users of
the proposed roadway facility. Perteet will describe the general landscape context, including
gross vegetation morphology of the study area using information from aerial photographs,
visual observations and Perteet's professional expertise.
Impact of proposed roadway facility: Changes to the visual quality of the area for sensitive
viewers caused by the proposed action will be analyzed for observers in the immediate area
as well as those from longer vistas. The key viewpoints established as part of the existing
conditions analysis will be used to provide the basis for photomontage simulations of the
visual impacts.
Light and glare from vehicles on the roadway will be described for impacts in the immediate
area and, possibly more distant areas in the impact area. Illumination of the roadway,
pedestrian areas and intersections will be described and mapped.
Recommendations will be made to mitigate perceived negative aesthetic impacts of the
proposed action. Where negative visual impacts are identified, visual mitigation measures
will be identified to ameliorate those conditions. These measures could include adjustments
to the alignment, elevation of the roadway, landscaping techniques that include landforms
and plantings and illumination design that minimizes light spillage. Positive impacts that
could include "wayfinding" and orientation devices to provide travelers with direction and
locational clues will be identified.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 27 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
4.3.2(18) Traffic And Transportation
This discipline report will include an analysis of future traffic conditions (year 2030) along
the project corridor for the two build alternatives (over and under) and the No Action
alternative. Existing studies and reports prepared for the project site and vicinity will l;
gathered and reviewed. Existing traffic count information will be collected from Renton,
Tukwila, and WSDOT files. Collection of any additional traffic counts will be the
responsibility of the City of Renton.
The analysis will include an assessment of traffic impacts on existing and planned non -
motorized facilities along Strander Boulevard / SW 27`h Street.
Forecasts of future traffic volumes will be obtained from the City's EMME/2 model. The
City will revise their model to include the proposed WSDOT modifications to the I-405
interchange with SR 167 and the associated arterial improvements. Manual adjustments of
the model output will be made as necessary to correct for location of zone centroids, link
connectors, etc. LOS calculations will be performed to evaluate future conditions for the
two build alternatives and the No Build alternative. A graphic traffic simulation (VISSIM or
equal) will be prepared for the section of roadway between West Valley Highway and
Oakesdale Avenue. Signal warrant analysis will be prepared for the proposed new signals
that will serve the new Sounder station and the Boeing Longacres site. An estimate of the
freight tonnage that will use the corridor on completion of the project will be prepared for
.the alternatives.
LOS calculations will be performed at the 5 signalized intersections along the alignment
(West Valley Highway), Sounder access road, Boeing access road, Oakesdale Avenue, and
East Valley Road).
An analysis of the impacts of the proposed improvements on freight, transit, and HOV
operations will be conducted for each of the alternatives. The analysis will also address the
effect of the No Action and Action alternatives on the general increase or decrease in traffic
volumes along SW Grady Way, SR 167, SW 43`a Street/180th Street, and on SR 181 for the
design year 2030.This discipline report will also address potential project impacts to the
railroad lines in the project area. The analysis of railroads will consider factors such as
existing and projected number of trains, train length, speed, and safety factors. The impact
analysis will assess the effect on railroad operations associated with temporary track
relocations as well as any long-term impacts from each of the alternatives. Impacts to the
Sounder Tukwila station layout and operations will also be discussed.
4.3.2(19) Public Services and Utilities
The Consultant will identify the location of public service facilities on maps and provide,
where relevant, discussion of the types of service provided, service area boundaries, levels
of use, access requirements, and other significant characteristics or values associated with
each service or facility. The primary public services to be reviewed include the following:
police and fire protection, medical and emergency services, and schools. Telephone contact
and/or in -person interviews with public service providers will be necessary to obtain current
information. All major public and private utilities known or thought to have facilities in the
project area will be identified, as well as noting any planned major utilities and
improvements.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 28 - Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
The environmental consequences analysis will describe potential direct and indirect impacts
resulting from both construction and operation to identified public services and utilities.
Particular attention will be given to utilities located within the railroad rights -of -way. A
discussion of procedures for coordination of utility relocation with the railroads and utility
providers will be included.
The mitigation discussion will suggest measures to minimize the identified impacts to public
services and utilities. Consultation with service providers will take place to assist in the
identification of reasonable and acceptable mitigation measures.
4.4 DRAFT EIS DOCUMENTATION
4.4.1 Select Preliminary Preferred Alternative
Objective: To support the IDT in its selection of a preliminary preferred alternative for
identification in the Draft EIS.
Approach: A concise summary matrix based on the summaries prepared as part of each
expertise report under Work Element 4 will be prepared. The summary matrix will briefly
identify the performance, benefits, substantial adverse impacts (if any), and potential for
mitigation for each alternative advanced for detailed study in the Draft EIS. The preliminary
preferred alternative will be identified and discussed in the Draft EIS.
Deliverable: Working summary matrix (work -in -progress), preparation for and participation
in one half -day IDT working session, and supporting handouts and presentation graphics for
the joint working session.
4.4.2 Prepare and Print Preliminary Draft EIS
The Draft EIS will be prepared in compliance with the requirements of NEPA (40 CFR 1500
to 1508), FHWA (23 CFR 771 and Technical Advisory T 6640.8A), and WSDOT
(Environmental Procedures Manual M31-11). The EIS also shall be prepared so that it can
satisfy SEPA EIS requirements according to the SEPA Rules, WAC 197-11.
It is assumed that all elements of the environment listed in FHWA Technical Advisory T
6640.8A will be scoped for detailed evaluation except for joint development, wild and
scenic rivers, coastal barriers, and coastal zone impacts. The preferred alternative may be
selected by the City for identification in the Draft EIS.
A preliminary Draft EIS will be prepared. Chapter 1 will incorporate the Statement of
Purpose and Need for the Action developed in Work Element 1 above. Chapter 2 will
incorporate the Description of Alternatives developed in Work Element 4 above. Chapter 3,
Affected Environment, and Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences, will be prepared by
summarizing the expertise reports prepared in Work Element 4 above. Discussion will
include secondary and cumulative impacts, construction activity impacts (to the extent they
can be predicted), irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources, and relationship
of short-term and long-term uses of the environment. The document will be written is a
concise, accurate, and thorough manner, and will emphasize language and graphics
understandable by the general public.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 29 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
The preliminary Draft EIS will be reviewed for format, style, clarity, and consistency prior
to delivery to the City. The Consultant's senior experts will review the document for
substantive content and technical accuracy. Twenty copies of the preliminary Draft EIS w;t1
be provided for review by the City, FHWA, City of Tukwila, and WSDOT using a form
and table of contents approved in advance. by the City and FHWA.
Technical appendices for each discipline report will be included as Volume 2 of the
DEIS.
4.4.3 Prepare Preliminary Summary and Matrix
After receiving the City and FHWA comments on the preliminary Draft EIS, the Consultant
will prepare a preliminary summaryand environmental matrix for the Draft EIS. The
summary will: describe the proposed action; identify other major governmental actions or
project affecting the corridor; describe all alternatives considered; discuss major
environmental impacts; identify any areas of controversy or unresolved issues; list other
actions and permits that may be required; and list environmental commitments.
The environmental matrix will include brief summaries of the distinguishing or substantial
environmental impacts of each alternative and each element of the environment. The matrix
also will indicate key mitigation measures and identify significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated (if any).
4.4.4 Prepare Camera-ready Draft EIS
The preliminary Draft EIS will be reviewed once by the Cities, WSDOT, and FHWA.
Review comments will be unified into a single document by the City. After review of the
comments by the Consultant, a one or, two-day review conference will be conducted witl
City to discuss specific comments and confirm the approach to revising the document.
Meeting minutes will be prepared by the Consultant and distributed to the appropriate team
members. The Draft EIS will be revised once by the Consultant into a final camera-ready
Draft EIS, as directed by the City. It is assumed that the City will establish and maintain the
project commitments file based on the environmental documents prepared by the
Consultant.
A camera-ready copy and five copies of the Draft EIS will be provided.
4.4. S Prepare Notice of Availability of Draft EIS
The Consultant will prepare a draft public availability notice for the Draft EIS that will
satisfy applicable requirements under Council on Environmental Quality NEPA Regulations
(40 CFR 1506.10) and the FHWA regulations (23 CFR Part 771.123 (i)). This draft notice
will be reviewed by the City and a final notice of public availability will be prepared by the
Consultant, as directed by the City. The City will be responsible for coordinating
publication of the notice in the Federal Register.
4.4.6 Print and Distribute Draft EIS
One camera-ready copy and The City will print and. distribute the Draft EIS after approval of
the camera-ready Draft EIS.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 30 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
4.5 COMMENT AND REVIEW FOR DRAFT EIS
4.5.1 Conduct Public Hearing
The Consultant will coordinate, schedule, and make arrangements for one public hearing. It
will be held on a convenient day of the week for up to five hours at City Hall. It is
anticipated that the hearing will be conducted in conjunction with an open house, and will be
in a space that affords room for individual stations corresponding to key subject areas. The
Consultant also will be responsible for providing a court reporter, display graphics, and
meeting materials.
Individual stations may include, but are not limited to, greeting/sign-in/room arrangement;
proposed action and alternatives; summary of key environmental issues, analyses, and
mitigation; relationship to other projects and planning processes in the region; and how the
public can be involved. One or more members of the Consultant team will staff each
station. The Consultant also will assist the City with media coverage. City staff will be in
attendance to assist with a presentation, staff specific stations, respond to inquiries
concerning other nearby projects of the City, and answer other general questions consistent
with their area of expertise or responsibility. Brief presentations may be made at specific
intervals (such as on the half-hour) to welcome attendees, provide a general overview of the
open house, and summarize the proposed action and EIS process.
The Consultant will prepare handouts, fact sheets, and response forms, and will print and
assemble 100 copies of these. Up to 16 display boards will be prepared that support the
meeting agenda.
The City will be responsible for publication of legal meeting notices. Legal notice of the
public hearing will include publication in newspapers of local and regional circulation.
The Consultant will be responsible for the following in connection with the public hearing:
• coordinate scheduling of the hearing with the City;
• brief staff at the public hearing on assignments, media contacts, recording public
comments, and encouraging use of response forms;
• arrange for set-up and take -down of the meeting;
• orient greeters to guide the public and assist the staff; and
• debrief staff at the meeting in order to capture verbal comments received.
The Consultant will compile and summarize both the verbal and written comments received
from the public.
4.6 RESPOND TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIS
4.6.1 Compile and Respond to Comments on Draft EIS
The City will provide copies of all written responses received to the Consultant. The
Consultant will review, identify, and code the individual comments contained in both the
written responses and the transcript of oral comments from the public hearings. The coding
system will identify specific comments by individual commenter and will be used to
establish a reference link between comments and responses.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 31 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
After review of the coded comments by the City and Consultant, a one -day conference will
be conducted with the City to discuss specific comments, confirm the approach to preparing
responses and revising the Draft EIS, and identify additional studies or revisions to the
proposed action and mitigation (if any) that may be necessary. If additional studies are
determined to be necessary, these will be identified, scoped, and budgeted under a separate
task. Meeting minutes will be prepared by the Consultant.
The coded comments and City guidance will be distributed to the appropriate team
members. After completion of additional studies (if any), preliminary responses will be
prepared that are concise, accurate and thorough, and which use language that is readily
understandable by the general public.
NOTE: The budget for this task assumes that there will be no more than 100 different topics
or issues that will need responses.
4.7 FINAL EIS DOCUMENTATION
4.7.1 Prepare and Print Preliminary Final EIS
The Final EIS will be prepared in compliance with the requirements of NEPA (40 CFR 1500
to 1508), FHWA (23 CFR 771 and Technical Advisory T 6640.8A), and WSDOT
(Environmental Procedures Manual M31-11). The EIS also shall be prepared so that it can
be adopted to satisfy SEPA requirements according to the SEPA Rules, WAC 197-11.
The Consultant will prepare the preliminary Final EIS. The preferred alternative will be
selected by the City for identification in the Final EIS if it was not identified in the Draft
EIS. The Draft EIS will be revised to incorporate changes throughout the document
resulting from modifications to the proposed project, selection of mitigation measures,
updated information on the affected environment, results of additional studies (if any),
factual corrections, results of coordination, and responses to comments prepared in the
previous task. The document will be written in a concise, accurate, and thorough manner,
and will emphasize language and graphics understandable by the general public.
The preliminary Final EIS will be reviewed for format, style, clarity, and consistency prior
to delivery to the City. The Consultant's senior experts will review the document for
substantive content, technical accuracy, and adequacy of responses to comments. Twenty
copies of the preliminary Final EIS will be provided for review using a format and table of
contents approved in advance by the City.
4.7.2 Prepare Camera-ready Final EIS
The preliminary Final EIS will be reviewed once by the City. Review comments of the City
will be unified into a single document by the City. After review of the comments by the
Consultant, a two-day review conference will be conducted with the City to discuss specific
comments and confirm the approach to revising the document. Meeting minutes will be
prepared by the Consultant and distributed to the appropriate team members. The Final EIS
will be revised once by the Consultant into a camera-ready Final EIS, as directed by the
City. Additionally, five copies of the Final EIS will be supplied. It is assumed that the City
will establish and maintain the project commitments file based on the environmental
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 32 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
documents prepared by the Consultant.
4.7.3 Prepare Notice of Availability of Final EIS
The Consultant will prepare a draft public availability notice for the Final EIS suitable for
publication in the Federal Register that will satisfy applicable requirements under Council
on Environmental Quality NEPA Regulations (40 CFR 1506.10) and the FHWA regulations
(23 CFR Part 771.123 (i)). This draft notice will be reviewed by the City and a final notice
of public availability will be prepared by the Consultant, as directed by the City. The City
will be responsible for coordinating publication of the notice in the Federal Register.
4.8 FINAL EIS DISTRIBUTION
4.8.1 Print and Distribute Final EIS
The City will print and distribute the Final EIS after approval of the camera-ready Final EIS.
5.0 PRELIMINARY BRIDGE DESIGN
5.1 RAILROAD COORDINATION
The Consultant will coordinate with railroad engineering project staff on the location of new
structures including vertical and horizontal clear distance requirements, bridge pier locations, and
excavation and staging requirements. The Consultant will develop technical memoranda for inclusion
with railroad submittals, develop required undercrossing or overcrossing graphics showing clearance
envelopes for railroad package submittal, and attend meetings with the Railroads to present concepts.
5.2 UNDERCROSSING AND OVERCROSSING ASSESSMENT
The Consultant will develop two alternatives for the Strander Boulevard grade separation structure.
The goal is to validate prior studies recommendation for an undercrossing in order to provide
supporting information for inclusion in the project's environmental process if required.
The first alternative reviewed will be an overcrossing of the railroad tracks. The overcrossing
alternative will be only developed as may be necessary to supplement the information contained in
the Project Definition Report to satisfy the environmental documentation for the project. Structure
alignment and column placement will be coordinated with the proposed rail improvements.
The second alternative reviewed will be an undercrossing option. Up to four undercrossing options
will be evaluated. Undercrossing alternatives will look at alternative bridge types and construction
sequencing. Constructability of the undercrossing will be evaluated considering the required
sequencing to meet rail operations requirements during the construction phase. Undercrossing
structure will be developed to 5-10% conceptual level incorporating the need for a design that will
resist hydrostatic (buoyancy) pressures. Structure types considered under this task will include single
span and multiple span options and one option involving an aesthetically enhanced structure type
such as an arch structure.
If required by the environmental process, a decision matrix will be developed to compare the
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 33 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
undercrossing alternative with the overcrossing alternative. Factors including future land
developments, construction costs, constructability, length of construction, staging and sequencing,
environmental impacts, geotechnical issues, right-of-way impacts, future maintenance issues, and
RR acceptance may be included.
A recommendation will be made for the preferred alternative to be developed to the 30% design
level for incorporation in the formal TS&L Report.
5.3 ADVANCE RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE TO 30% TS&L
The recommended alternative will be developed to the 30% design level. For the purpose of
developing this scope and associated fee it is assumed that the undercrossing alternative without the
aesthetically enhanced railroad bride (arch or other unconventional structure type) will be the
recommended alternative to be advance to the 30% TS&L stage.
Preliminary analysis will be performed to determine approximate member sizes. A Plan, Elevation
and Typical Section sheet will be developed to show the recommended alternative. A 30%
construction cost estimate will be developed and an Engineers construction schedule will be
developed.
5.4 TYPE, SIZE, AND LOCATION (TS&L) REPORT
The results of the undercrossing/overcrossing assessment along with the 30% design of the
recommended alternative will be summarized in a TS&L report. The plan, elevation, and typical
section for the recommended alternative will be included. Preliminary construction cost estimates
and construction schedule will be included.
6.0 PRELIMINARY RAILROAD DESIGN
INTRODUCTION
The intent of this scope of services is to provide the preliminary engineering design for the track
improvements and shoofly tracks. The scope includes preliminary engineering design for relocation
of approximately 6500 feet of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) mainline and for construction of
shoofly tracks at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) double -track mainline. These
services are intended to initiate the preparation of construction contract plans and specifications
required to complete the work under competitive bid.
ASSUMPTIONS
Certain assumptions have been made in the preparation of this scope of services. They are
summarized as follows:
• Contractor forces will perform all construction except for track and signal/communication work
within railroad rights -of -way.
• Plans and calculations will be prepared using English units of measure.
• Final engineering, design, and construction required to relocate fiber optic cables that may be
impacted by this project are not included in this Phase of the agreement.
• Track improvements will be designed in accordance with the applicable standards of the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) and American Railway Engineering and Maintenance -of -Way
Association (AREMA) and design criteria of the BNSF and UPRR.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 34 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
6.1 RAILROAD COORDINATION
The Consultant will coordinate with the UPRR and the BNSF on both a local staff level and the
corporate level. Travel to Omaha, Nebraska, and Fort Worth, Texas, is anticipated in order to meet
with UPRR and BNSF senior staff with signature authority for the project. Coordination meetings
with the railroads will also include structural, right-of-way, utility, easements/permits, and other
issues related to the project that may require railroad review and approval. For budgeting purposes,
it is assumed that two senior members of the consultant team will make one visit to each railroad
headquarters.
6.2 PREPARE PRELIMINARY RAILROAD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The Consultant will prepare plans and specifications to the 30% completion level for preliminary
design. The basis for the plans will be conceptual plans developed with the railroads and Sound
Transit at a design charrette to be held shortly after project start-up.
6.3 RAIL DESIGN CHARRETTE
Prepare for and attend a design charrette with the BNSF, UPRR, and Sound Transit to develop the
rail conceptual plans. The charrette will include coordination with the utilities, commuter rail,
streets, and structural elements of the project. It will also determine the extent of shoofly track
requirements for the BNSF portion of the project.
6.4 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES
Prepare estimates of the probable construction costs for the track/civil work based on the
preliminary design plans and draft specifications. Cost estimates will be prepared and submitted in a
spreadsheet format. The estimates will be broken down by the major elements of construction work
with estimated quantities, unit costs, and total costs. A contingency factor appropriate for the level
of design will be added to the total cost of all track/civil construction work. The unit costs for the
various items of work will be based on historical information from similar projects designed by the
consultant. A brief narrative describing the various major elements of work will accompany the
cost estimate.
6.5 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES
Prepare a detailed CPM schedule and staging plan of the track/civil construction elements. The
schedule will prepared utilizing Microsoft Project 2000 project management scheduling software.
Preparation of the schedule will include close coordination with BNSF, UPRR, Sound Transit, local
agencies, and utilities. Track time work windows and rail operational requirements will be
coordinated with the railroads and Sound Transit commuter rail operations.
7.0 GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
This task includes drilling borings, installing groundwater monitoring wells, and conducting field-testing to
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 35 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
gather subsurface soil and groundwater information. Additional field explorations and testing may be
required for final design once the final construction alternatives are known.
Borings will be completed to obtain geotechnical and hydrogeological data; they will not be used to add---s
environmental conditions. For worker safety, volatile screening will be completed with a photoionizati
detector on the soil samples obtained above the groundwater table. Visual or olfactory observations
regarding potential contamination will be noted. If a potentially contaminated soil sample is found, it will
be stored in an appropriate glass jar for fiu-ther analysis and testing. Analysis, testing, storage, and handling
of potentially contaminated soil and groundwater (either sampled or spoils from drilling) are beyond this
scope of services. However, if contaminated soils and/or groundwater are encountered, the material will be
properly contained on -site for disposal as mutually agreed upon.
Geotechnical laboratory tests will be performed on selected samples. Laboratory testing will include
natural water content determinations, grain size analyses, and Atterberg Limits to determine the index
properties of the subsurface soils at the site. Where relatively undisturbed samples are obtained,
consolidation and triaxial strength tests (unconsolidated-undrained and consolidated-undrained triaxial
tests) will be performed on selected soil samples to measure their engineering properties. Where
significant organics are noted in the samples, organic contents will also be determined.
7.1 SEGMENT 1 - (WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO OAKESDALE AVENUE)
The proposed boring plan assumes that the UPRR track will be moved close to the BNSF tracks.
Drill and sample 14 borings to characterize the subsurface conditions at the site.
The proposed boring designations, approximate locations, estimated depths, and purpose of each
boring is listed in the table below. Groundwater monitoring wells (designated on the table with
"MW") will be installed in five of the relatively shallow borings and one relatively deep vibrati.
wire piezometer will be installed (designated on the table with a "VWP"). Three shallow vibrating
wire piezometers will be installed in three of the borings that also contain monitoring wells
(designated on the table with an "MW &VWP"). Drilling spoils will be left on site (stockpiled).
S
Boffin
�.Loca o�,
East of Strander Boulevard 50
B-101 MW
Western end of wall for undercrossing
and groundwater data
B-102
East of Strander Boulevard
100
Wall for undercrossing
B-103
RR Undercrossing
180
Excavation supportibridges for
undercrossing
B-104 MW
RR Undercrossing
50
Groundwater data for undercrossing
& VWP
B-105
RR Undercrossing
180
Excavation support/bridges for
VWP
undercrossing and groundwater data
B-106 MW
RR Undercrossing
50
Groundwater data for undercrossing
& VWP
B-107
RR Undercrossing
180
Excavation support/bridges for
undercrossing
B-108 MW
RR Undercrossing
50
Groundwater data for undercrossing
.&VWP
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 36 oiranael DIVU. CALU1101VII
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
B-109
Eastern End of
Undercrossing
100
Wall for undercrossing
13-110 MW
Eastern End of
Undercrossing
50
Eastern end of wall for undercrossing
and groundwater data
B-111
East of Undercrossing
25
Roadway
B-112
East of Undercrossing
25
Roadway
B-113
South of Undercrossing
30
Railroad shoofly
B-114
North of Undercrossing
30
Railroad shoofly
Develop the installed wells by surging and pumping to enhance the hydraulic connection between
the well screen and the surrounding soils. Obtain the groundwater levels on a monthly basis
through the wet season (October to April) to evaluate seasonal groundwater fluctuations. Install a
pressure transducer/datalogger system in the well closest to the river to collect a continuous record
of water levels for a period of three months. At the same time, monitor the water level in the Green
River by obtaining data from the nearest gaging station. The water level data collected from the
well and the river will be used to evaluate the impact of changes in the stage of the Green River on
groundwater levels beneath the proposed alignment.
Perform a slug test at each of the monitoring wells to evaluate groundwater conditions associated
with the underpass. Slug tests can be used to estimate aquifer coefficients used in preliminary
dewatering design; however, the area influenced by slug tests is limited to soils near the well. Slug
tests do not provide information regarding aquifer geometry or heterogeneity. Prior to final design,
additional aquifer information may be required for additional dewatering evaluation depending on
subsurface conditions observed during the preliminary engineering field investigations. If
additional aquifer information is needed, we will recommend performing a pumping test in
permeable soils below the proposed underpass. A pumping test would provide an indication of the
impacts of the nearby Green River on dewatering activities and the potential for settlements as a
result of dewatering activities.
Create a preliminary subsurface profile to reflect the subsurface conditions encountered in the soil
borings.
Complete preliminary engineering studies, as required based on the subsurface conditions
encountered in the proposed soil borings. Provide a geotechnical report that includes preliminary
recommendations for the temporary railroad shooflies, the railroad undercrossing excavation and
permanent sidewall and bottom seal, railroad and pedestrian bridge foundations, temporary and/or
permanent dewatering, and roadway subgrade preparation.
Provide a scope of work and cost estimate for final design studies. It is anticipated that final design
may include the need for additional borings along the chosen alignment and at selected project
features.
7.2 SEGMENT 2 - (OAKESDALE AVENUE TO EAST VALLEY ROAD)
Drill and sample six borings to characterize the subsurface conditions along the roadway alignment;
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 37 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
the borings would be spaced approximately every 700 feet. The proposed boring designations,
approximate locations, estimated depths, and purpose of each boring are listed in the table below.
No groundwater monitoring wells will be installed. Drilling spoils will be taken to Segment 1 and
left on site (stockpiled).
A
B-201
Along SW 27` Street,
near Oakesdale
Avenue
25
Roadway
B-202
Along SW 271Street
25
Roadway
B-203
Along SW 271Street
100
S ringbrook Creek overcrossing
B-204
Along SW 27` Street
25
Roadway
B-205
Along SW 27` Street
25
Roadway
B-206
Along SW 27'h Street,
near East Valley
Highway
25
Roadway
Create a preliminary subsurface profile to reflect the subsurface conditions encountered in the soil
borings.
Complete preliminary engineering studies, as required based on the subsurface conditions
encountered in the proposed soil borings. Provide a geotechnical report that includes preliminary
recommendations for the Springbrook Creek crossing, the roadway widening subgrade preparation,
and the pavement design.
Provide a scope of work and cost estimate for final design studies. It is anticipated that final design
may include the need for additional borings along the chosen alignment and at selected project
features.
8.0 SURVEYING
Services to be provided include control surveys, ground based topographic mapping completion surveys,
aerial photogrammetry which will include digital orthophotography and digital aerial mapping.
Surveying will be sufficient to complete the project design. Surveys will comply with the City of
Renton requirements. Also included in this element is the field location of existing underground
utilities.
8.1 CONTROL SURVEYS
Control surveys for the project will include datum control surveys, pre -marks for aerial
photogrammetry, ground control for topographic completion surveys and control surveys for road
and railroad right-of-ways, and for parcel boundary calculations.
Datum control surveys will be to provide the project in Washington State Plane Coordinate System
(WSPCS), North Zone (NAD 83/91) horizontal datum; and North American Vertical Datum
(NAVD 88). We will identify or establish approximately 10 horizontal control points and 7 ve
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 38 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
benchmarks for the project.
Aerial photogrammetry `pre -mark' control spacing will be coordinated with our subconsultant as
needed for 1" = 400' photo scale and 1" = 20' mapping scale.
8.2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING COMPLETION SURVEYS
In areas where the ground is obscured on the aerial photography, ground based topographic surveys
may be required. These surveys will be provided with the same level of detail and to the same map
accuracy standards as the aerial photogrammetric mapping. In addition, ground based topographic
surveys will be included to supplement the aerial photogrammetric mapping for key vertical
elements. These include rail lines and associated infrastructure, storm drainage & sanitary sewer
structures, paving edge, road crown, curb lines and drainage corridors. Existing underground
utilities that may be impacted by the project will be located horizontally and vertically either by the
affected utility or by Consultant supplied forces.
Surveying of wetland delineation flagging is included in the item.
8.3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
Digital orthophotography will be provided along the proposed roadway alignment from the Green
River to East Valley Road. This digital orthophotography will be approximately 500' wide. In
addition, this orthophotography will include a north -south strip that includes both the BNSF and
UPRR rails and extends at least 100 feet outside of the rails from approximately 1300 feet south of
the Strander Boulevard extension to I-405.
This digital orthophotography will be provided at the following specifications:
Color imagery @ 0.33'pixel resolution.
8.4 DIGITAL AERIAL MAPPING
Aerial mapping will be provided for a 200' strip of the digital orthophotography, 100 feet on either
side of the proposed road centerline. This digital aerial mapping will be at a scale of 1" = 20' and
include DTM generated 0.5'contours. All topographic features, which are clearly visible and
identifiable to the stereo plotter operator, will be shown on the mapping. Topographic features will
include but not be limited to the following:
Edge of Pavement/Curb & Gutter
Pavement Striping
Driveways (paved & unpaved)
Sidewalks and Walkways
Utility Poles
Fences
Houses, Garages, Sheds
Survey Monuments (Pre -marks)
Streams
Trees
Shrubs
Gravel Shoulders
Gravel Parking Areas
Fire Hydrants
Rockeries
Walls
Utility Structures
Wetlands
All aerial & supplemental ground topographic survey mapping will be delivered in digital
AutoCAD format, with standard City of Renton layering, symbology and attribute conventions. All
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 39 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
mapping will be two-dimensional with individual line segments connecting points. Final digital
files are to be contiguous at a 1 to 1 scale in model space. Point data blocks will include number
identifier, elevation and description fields will also be included. Mapping is to be planimetric with
digital terrain modeling. Mapping to comply with the National Map Accuracy Standards for 1" _
20' scale mapping.
9.0 RIGHT OF WAY
Perform preliminary identification of right-of-way parcels to be impacted by the proposed construction,
determine legal status of UPRR right-of-way and abutter reversionary interests, and prepare preliminary
opinion of cost to acquire right-of-way for the project. It is assumed that the City of Tukwila is acquiring
the property between the UPRR and BNSF tracks referred to as the McCleod property.
9.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Right-of-way parcels will be determined based on available records through the GIS of Renton and
Tukwila, County assessor's data, market research, and railroad company land records. Real estate
trends in the area will also be used.
9.2 APPROACH
Identify property type e.g. industrial, business, residential, or railroad. For non- railroad properties
the cost of acquisition will be estimated based on standard evaluation techniques and the evaluation
criteria. Railroad properties will be evaluated based on the value of land, the cost of replacement
properties, and replacement of facilities.
10.0 ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT
10.1 PERFORM ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Develop and refine horizontal and vertical alignment alternatives for the segment of roadway
between West Valley Highway and Oakesdale Avenue as required to support the analysis of one
overcrossing and four undercrossing alternatives. The overcrossing alternative will be only
developed as may be necessary to supplement the information contained in the Project Definition
Report to satisfy the environmental documentation for the project. Undercrossing alternatives will
look at alternative bridge types and construction sequencing.
The horizontal alignment for the project has been determined by the Project Definition Report and
by the City's acceptance of detailed development plans for the Boeing site. However, the exact
alignment remains to be fixed based on detailed survey information.
Develop two alternatives for widening the portion of 271h Street between Oakesdale Avenue and
East Valley Road. The two alternatives to be studied are widening symmetrically, and widening to
the north.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 40 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
10.2 PREPARE DESIGN SUMMARY
The results of the alternative analysis will be summarized in a format suitable for incorporation into
the EIS.
10.3 SELECT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
An evaluation matrix will be developed for purpose of comparing the costs, environmental impacts,
construction feasibility, staged construction flexibility, and other criteria as may be developed
during the course of the work. Selection of the preferred alternative will be made by the City, and
the preferred alternative will be presented in the project EIS.
11.0 HYDRAULICS ANALYSIS
The results of this work will be summarized in a Hydraulic Report conforming to City of Renton standards.
11.1 IDENTIFY DRAINAGE BASINS
Develop drainage basin maps for the project. The maps will identify the street drainage area limits
and their relation to the City's established basins, contributing off -site drainage areas, direction of
flow, existing conveyance and drainage facilities, and ground cover. Drainage basin maps will be
prepared for both the existing condition and the proposed roadway improvements.
11.2 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
Identify stormwater quality facility options to serve the road improvements, and determine the
design approach to be used for the project. Identify the approximate size and location of the
proposed facilities for each of the drainage basins within the project.
11.3 OUTFALLS
Identify the storm discharge/outfall locations for existing conditions, applicable to each drainage
basin. Identify any new discharge locations for the new roadways. Conduct a downstream analysis
(Level 1), in accordance with City of Renton Standards.
11.4 DETENTION AND CONVEYANCE
Prepare stormwater detention facility and conveyance options to serve the roadway improvements.
Identify the approximate size and location of the proposed facilities, for each of the drainage basins
within the project. Provide detention for downstream protection. In addition, show the connection
of new storm pipes to existing storm pipe systems or stream discharge locations.
11.5 LAYOUT
Prepare a plan view, schematic layout of the storm conveyance system. The plan is to show:
existing conveyance system, new storm conveyance facilities, and receiving waters/discharge
points.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 41 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
11.6 PUMP STATION
A storm pump station is planned to be constructed at the low point of Strander Blvd. Provide a
schematic plan of the pump station location, force main route and discharge point. Determine
design flowrates and the approximate size of the pumps. Evaluate power availability/limitations for
the pump station through discussions with power supplier.
11.7 FLOODPLAIN COMPENSATORY STORAGE
A portion of the road improvements has been identified as impacting the 100-yr floodplain. It has
been determined that compensatory storage will be required to compensate for filling within the
100-yr floodplain. The hydraulics report will include determining the approximate volumes of
compensatory storage needed, as a result of the proposed road improvements. Existing 100-year
floodplain studies will be used in this analysis. Coordinate with King County for Green River
discharge impacts.
12.0 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (30%)
Thirty percent, preliminary plans for a preferred design alternative will be prepared for the project,
based on the preferred alternative identified by the City. It is assumed that the preliminary plans will fit
on fourteen "base sheets", utilizing 22" by 34" sheets at 1-inch = 20-inch scale.
At this time a total of 54 civil plan sheets (based on fourteen base sheets) are assumed as necessary for
the preliminary plans. These preliminary plans will be used as a basis for development of detailed plans
in the PS&E phase of the project. Specific preliminary plans are anticipated to consist of.
These civil plans will be combined with the preliminary bridge and railroad plans developed under other
tasks to create a comprehensive 30% design intended to provide a more detailed assessment of project
cost, and to serve as a basis for preparation of PS&E documents.
12.1 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION (1 sheet, not to scale)
12.2 PAVING AND GRADING PLANS (14 sheets).
These plans will include horizontal alignment information, paving limits, limits of cut/fill
required and earth retaining systems. Preliminary right-of-way needs will be determined from
these plans.
12.3 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLANS (14 sheets).
These plans will include the proposed drainage conveyance system, water quality, and detention
facilities for the project.
12.4 CHANNELIZATION, SIGNING, AND ILLUMINATION PLANS (14 sheets).
Develop conceptual channelization and signing plans that illustrate project channelization and
signing. During the final design phase, these plans will also include any illumination and
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 42 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
conduit systems that will become associated with the project.
12.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS (6 sheets).
Preliminary signal plans to identify pole and head locations.
12.6 WALL PLANS (2 sheets assumed).
Preliminary wall layouts at locations along SW 27'h Street as required to protect wetlands and
minimize property encroachments.
12.7 OPINION OF COST
An opinion of cost will be prepared based on the 30% plans, and will include allowances for
acquisition of right-of-way. The opinion of cost will be based on unit prices, and incorporate
about a 30% contingency to account for the level of completeness of plan preparation, and to
reflect past experience on similar projects within the region.
12.8 CONSTRUCTION STAGING OPPORTUNITIES (3 sheets assumed)
Project segments that maybe constructed as individual project stages will be identified, and costs
for each segment will be prepared based on the 30% opinion of cost.
All plans will be developed to a 30% design level for review and concurrence by City staff.
Review plans will be submitted on 11" by 17", half size plan sheets.
12.9 PRELIMINARY OPINION OF COST, INCLUDING COST FOR RIGHT-OF-
WAY ACQUISITION
12.10 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT SEGMENTS THAT MAYBE
CONSTRUCTED AS INDIVIDUAL PROJECT STAGES, AND PREPARATION
OF ASSOCIATED COST ESTIMATES.
12.11 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE LAYOUT
OPTIONAL SERVICES
Optional services which may be performed include:
0 Assistance with preparation of grant funding packages.
Provision of optional services will require a supplement to this agreement.
WORK ORDER 2 - PREPARATION OF PS&E (REQUIRES SUPPLEMENT)
The actual scope of services and the fee for services for preparation of PS&E (contract documents)
biological assessment, and related permitting assistance will be negotiated during completion of the
preliminary design phase when the actual construction stages can be identified, and will be included as a
supplement to this agreement.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 43 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
WORK ORDER 3 - RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN PREPARATION
(REQUIRES SUPPLEMENT)
The actual scope of services and the fee for services during right-of-way acquisition and acquisition will he
negotiated during completion of the project design when this element of the work can be more accura
identified, and will be included as a supplement to this agreement. The following describes a typical sc,upe
of services for this phase of the work:
1. Order and provide copies of title reports for each parcel along the corridor where right-of-way is to
be obtained. Invoices for the title reports will be sent directly to the City for payment.
2. Prepare final right-of-way plans in accordance with WSDOT standards.
3. Prepare parcel maps for use in the negotiation process.
4. Provide marking or staking of the right-of-way to be acquired to assist the appraisal and negotiation
process.
5. Prepare legal descriptions of required takes.
6. Attend bi-weekly meetings with the City during the negotiation process.
7. By qualified subconsultant, prepare appraisals of the right-of-way acquisitions required to construct
the project. Consultant will assist the right-of-way appraisers and negotiators as may be necessary
to define the extent of takings and to prepare possible mitigation measures. Services to acquire
property through condemnation shall be considered as extra work.
By subconsultant, assist the City in the acquisition of new right-of-way by supplying qualified right-
of-way negotiators.
WORK ORDER 4 - SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION (REQUIRES
SUPPLEMENT)
The actual scope of services and the fee for services during construction will be negotiated as a supple
to previous phases of services following the completion of the design phase. The following describes a
typical scope of services for this phase of the work:
1. Provide the services of a full-time resident project representative (s) who will observe the technical
conduct of the construction. The Consultant will endeavor to protect the Agency against defects
and deficiencies in the work of the Contractor, but he cannot guarantee the Contractor's
performance and he shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques,
sequences, procedures or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work.
2. Spot check the construction staking and construction layouts as performed by the construction
contractor.
3. Recommend actions on questions, which may arise as to the quality and acceptability of materials
furnished, work performed, and rate of progress of work.
4. Measure the quantities of materials for pay items and record and report on the construction
operation.
5. Prepare and recommend for approval periodic requests for payment submitted by the Construction
Contractor.
6. Review shop drawings, samples, traffic control plans, test reports and other data submitted by the
Contractor for compliance with the information given in the contract documents.
7. Assist the City in providing documents and records for general compliance with State and Federal
requirements.
8. Prepare record drawings of the completed project.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 44 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
TIME FOR COMPLETION:
All work under Work Order 1 of this contract shall be completed within 24 months (730 calen.
notice to proceed.
SUBCONSULTANTS:
The following subconsultants will be used to assist in accomplishment of the work:
• David Evans & Associates, Inc. (DEA) — Bridge and railroad design engineering
• Shannon & Wilson, Inc. — Geotechnical studies
• CivilTech Corporation — Retaining walls
• Hough, Beck & Baird, Inc. — Landscape architecture
• MFG, Inc. — Air / noise analysis
• Larson Anthropological & Archaeological Services - Historical and cultural resources
• DMJM Harris — Design charrette, railroad negotiation assistance, and peer review of plan
concepts and construction sequencing
MINIMUM NOTICE OF MEETING REQUIRING CONSULTANT PARTICIPATION:
Consultant will normally be given a minimum of 24-hour notice of required meeting attendance.
ITEMS TO BE PREPARED AND/OR FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT:
1. Sign -in sheets, fact sheets, handouts, announcements, information packets, material for
mailings, and meeting minutes for Agency Scoping Meeting — 20 copies.
2. Handouts, fact sheets, and response forms for Public Scoping Meeting — 100 copies
3. Handouts, fact sheets, and response forms for Public Hearing on Draft EIS — 100 copies
4. Up to date list of key project contacts.
5. Final MOA or MOU's - 1 original for each Signatory agency
6. Draft and final discipline reports —10 copies
7. Preliminary Draft and preliminary Final EIS — 20 copies
8. Draft and Final EIS — 5 copies and 1 camera-ready copy of each (for reproduction by the City)
9. Ten copies of half-size plans to meet the needs of the City for review purposes — one review
cycle assumed.
10. One set of all sheets comprising the set of 30% plans on disk in AutoCAD format.
11. Copy of all survey information.
ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY:
1. City will provide copies of all previous studies and environmental documentation of the project.
2. Copies of plans, profiles, cross sections, field topographic survey notes or documents available
to City that will aid in the preparation of the plans and studies within the limits of the project.
3. Additional traffic counts as needed.
4. Output from the City's EMME/2 model for the base and forecast 2030 years.
5. As -built information of existing plans.
6. Copy of consolidated comments received from the Draft EIS.
7. Copies of the City's standard contract boilerplate.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 45 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
8. Mailings necessary for the public hearings and environmental process.
9. Meeting rooms and refreshments.
10. Title reports for parcels affected by the project
11. Assistance in obtaining rights of entry needed for geotechnical studies, surveying, w-,"-nd
delineations, etc.
DESIGN CRITERIA:
Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition
and amendments of the following:
I. AASHTO 2001, "A Policy of Geometric Design of Highways and Streets."
2. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Standard Specifications for Road and
Bridge Construction."
3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Design Manual."
4. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline."
5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual."
6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines."
7. Highway Research Board's Manual entitled "Highway Capacity."
8. FHWA and Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways."
9. Standard drawings prepared by City of Renton and furnished to the Consultant shall be used
as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions.
10. AASHTO "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities."
11. WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual
12. WSDOT Hydraulics Manual
13. King County Surface Water Design Manual
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 46 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
EXHIBIT C-2
PAYMENT
(COST PLUS FIXED FEE)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this AGREEMENT
as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or services rendered and for all
labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work specified in Section H, "Scope of Services."
The CONSULTANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48 CFR 31.
A. Actual Costs
Payment for all consulting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT's actual cost plus a
fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost.
1. Direct Salary Costs
The direct salary cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the
time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.
Overhead Costs
Overhead costs are those costs other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the
CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the rate
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT, under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total overhead payment
shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT. The three options are explained as
follows:
a. Actual Cost Not To Exceed Maximum Percent: If this method is indicated in the heading of this .
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT at the actual overhead rate verified
by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment when
accumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT.
b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to
reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change
during the life of the AGREEMENT.
A summary of the CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as Exhibit
D- I and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the Actual Cost
Not To Exceed method is used, the CONSULTANT (prime and all subconsultants) will submit to the AGENCY
within three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead schedule in the format required by the
AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose of adjusting the overhead rate for billing
purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and for
retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to reflect the actual rate.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime consultant or any of the subconsultants shall cause
the agency to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required information is
received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
The STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the CONSULTANT's books and records at
any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. Direct Nonsalary
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 47 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
Direct nonsalary costs will be reimbursed at the actual cost to the CONSULTANT. These charges may include,
but are not limited to the following items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges,
and fees of subconsultants. Air or train travel will only be reimbursed to economy class levels unless otherwise
approved by the AGENCY. Automobile mileage for travel will be reimbursed at the current rate approved `-
AGENCY employees and shall be supported by the date and time of each trip with origin and destination c
such trips. Subsistence and lodging expenses will be reimbursed at the same rate as for AGENCY employees.
The billing for nonsalary cost, directly identifiable with the Project, shall be an itemized listing of the charges
supported by copies of original bills, invoices, expense accounts, and miscellaneous supporting data retained by
the CONSULTANT. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be provided to the AGENCY upon
request. All of the above charges must be necessary for the services to be provided under this AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee
The fixed fee, which represents the CONSULTANT's profit, is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT
under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any additional fixed fee which could be authorized from the
Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the scope of services defined in this AGREEMENT and the
estimated man -months required to perform the stated scope of services. In the event a supplemental agreement
is entered into for additional work by the CONSULTANT, the supplemental agreement may include provisions
for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The fixed fee will be prorated and paid monthly in
proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the monthly progress
reports accompanying the invoices.
Any portion of the fixed fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final
payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX, Termination of Agreement.
5. Management Reserve Fund
The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator
the flexibility of authorizing additional funds to the AGREE for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the
CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s)
shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as sb
in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in
heading of this agreement. This fund may be replenished in a subsequent supplemental agreement. Any
changes requiring additional costs in excess of the "Management Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance
with Section XfV, "Extra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amount Payable
The maximum total amount payable, by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall
not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the Fixed
Fee and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for
extra work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work."
B. Monthly Progress Payments
The CONSULTANT may submit invoices to the AGENCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the calculated
overhead and fee not more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such invoices shall be in a
format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under Section III,
General Requirements, of this AGREEMENT. The invoices will be supported by an itemized listing for each item
including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to
which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary cost for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of
recording the names, titles, and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the
interview.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 48 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
C. Final Payment
Final payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its
verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of
all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this
AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for
payment which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in
writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not,
however, be a bar to any claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the
AGENCY may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the
appropriateness of any item and that at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a
final payment. In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT
will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within ninety (90) days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund
shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the
AGENCY of overpayment.
D. Inspection of Cost Records
The CONSULTANT and the subconsultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the AGENCY
and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception: if any litigation,
claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this contract is initiated before the expiration of the
three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the
records is completed.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 49 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
►
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
2056
x
$53.85 =
$110,716
Assoc
372
x
$45.67 =
$16,989
Assoc
1006
x
$41.35 =
$41,598
Sr. Pr. Mgr
490
x
$37.00 =
$18,130
Pr. Mgr
340
x
$32.00 =
$10,880
Sr. Env Planner
1312
x
$43.51 =
$57,085
Urban Dsgn Mng
624
x
$39.43 =
$24,604
Proj Engr
772
x
$29.25 =
$22,581
Dsgn Engr 11
800
x
$26.25 =
$21,000
Dsgn Engr 1
816
x
$24.00 =
$19,584
Dsgnr/fech
1208
x
$23.50 =
$28,388
Graphic Artist
276
x
$22.50 =
$6,210
Prin. Lnd Svyr
127
x
$44.23 =
$5,617
Sr. PLS
123
x
$37.98 =
$4,672
Proj. Sury
229
x
$26.50 =
$6,069
Survey Crew (2)
532
x
$46.04 =
$24,493
Proj. Asst
1068
x
$17.50 =
$18,690
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $437,306
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 165.72 % x $437,306 = $724,704
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 35%
x $437,306 = $153,057
REIMBURSABLES:
DeGross Mapping
$15,350
APS
$8,000
Reproduction
$11,975
Postage/Delivery
$800
Travel to Ft Worth and Omaha
$4,000
Traffic Software ($15/hr)
$2,550
Color Copying ($0.80/page)
$800
GPS (Static)
$1,200
Mileage/Co. vehicle ($0.36/mile)
53,942
CADD @ $10/hr
$12,080
GPS (RTK)
$2,000
Supplies
$2,600
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST = $65,297
SUBCONSULTANTS-
David Evans & Associates, Inc.
$432,650
Shannon & Wilson, Inc.
$182,920
CivilTech Corporation
$27,060
Hough Beck & Baird, Inc.
$28,194
MFG, Inc.
$23,053
Larson Anthropological & Archaeological
Servict $13,665
DMJM Harris
$20,146
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT COST = $727,588
SUBTOTAL = $2,107,952
Escalation Factor = $105,397
GRAND TOTAL: _ $2,213,349
Prepared By:
Date: January 23, 2003
Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category
listed. Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each
employee may have a different hourly rate of pay_ Employee compensation is subject to
adjustment in June of each calendar year. Project billings will reflect the actual compensation
of the employees assigned to the project, regardless of the rate shown in the fee estimate.
Exhibit E
Perteet Engineering, Inc.
Overhead Schedule
December 31, 2000
Description
Trial Balance
Adjustments
Amount
Ref.
Accepted
Amount
%
Direct Labor Base
$2,076,291
$6,673
M
$2,082,964
Fringe Benefits:
Payroll Taxes
$343,185
$343,185
16.48%
Insurance - Medical/Dental
186,745
186,745
8.97%
Vacation/Holiday/Sick Leave
360,091
360,091
17.29%
Bonuses
437,421
437,421
21.00%
Total Fringe Benefits
$1,327,442
$0
$1,327,442
63.74%
General Overhead:
G & A Wages
$1,139,913
$6,673
M
$1,133,240
54.41%
Auto Expense
63,600
63,600
3.05%
Bank & Service Fees
8,385
8,385
0.40%
Claims
4,068
4,068
B,H
0
0.00%
Communications
40,945
40,945
1.97%
Computer Expenses
23,520
23,520
1.13%
Copier Expense
$19,839
19,839
0.95%
Depreciation - Tax Basis
209,556
17,530
A
192,026
9.22%
Dues & Memberships
17,358
4,504
A,F
12,854
0.62%
Insurance
57,755
57,755
2.77%
Janitorial
4,640
4,640
0.22%
License & Fees
1,428
1,428
0.07%
Meals
21,742
10,745
A,L
10,997
0.53%
Miscellaneous
3,340
3,096
A
244
0.01%
Office Supplies
46,168
46,168
2.22%
Outside Services
10,542
300
B
10,242
0.49%
Postage & Delivery Services
7,947
180
C
7,767
0.37%
Professional Services
20,028
1,160
A,G
18,868
0.91%
Recruiting
26,636
26,636
1.28%
Rent
308,764
63
I
308,701
14.82%
Repairs & Maintenance
11,824
11,824
0.57%
Reproduction
4,615
4,615
0.22%
Seminars & Conferences
27,573
97
J
27,476
1.32%
Staff Functions
12,170
9,724
A,K
2,446
0.12%
Loss on Sale of Asset
150
150
0.01%
Strategic Planning
17,520
1,010
A
16,510
0.79%
Subscriptions & Publications
8,081
8,081
0.39%
Supplies
39,681
291
D
39,390
1.89%
Travel & Lodging
24,949
6,291
A,E
18,658
0.90%
Advertising
8,921
8,921
A
0
0.00%
Bad Debt Expense
5,495
5,495
A
0
0.00%
Contributions
5,759
5,759
A
0
0.00%
Interest
58,768
58,768
A
0
0.00%
Taxes - Business & Property
113,301
113,301
5.44%
Less: Offsets for Direct Costs
-105,766
-105,766
-5.08%
Total General Overhead
$2,269,215
-144,675
$2,413,890
102.00%
Total Overhead & Benefits
$3,596,657
-144,675
$3,451,982
165.72%
Overhead Rate
173.23%
165.72%
EXHIBIT F
PAYMENT UPON TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
BY THE AGENCY OTHER THAN FOR FAULT OF THE CONSULTANT
(Refer to Agreement Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made,
shall total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of
termination is to the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any
authorized extra work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 52 Strander Blvd. extension
Revised 12199 City of Renton
EXHIBIT G
SUBCONTRACTED WORK
The AGENCY permits CONSULTANT to subcontract for the following portions of the work of this
AGREEMENT:
David Evans &.Associates, Inc. — Bridge and railroad design engineering
Shannon & Wilson, Inc. — Geotechnical studies
CivilTech Corporation — Retaining walls
Hough Beck & Baird, Inc. — Landscape architecture
MFG, Inc. — Air/noise analysis
Larson Anthropological & Archaeological Services — Historical and cultural resources
DMJM Harris — Design charrette, railroad negotiation assistance, and peer review of plan concepts and
construction sequencing
Subconsultant must be approved in writing by AGENCY prior to CONSULTANT obtaining services noted
above.
DOT Form 140-089EF Page 53 Strander Blvd. Extension
Revised 12/99 City of Renton
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
164
x
$56.00 =
$9,184
Asst. PM
390
x
$41.00 =
$15,990
Sr. Scientist
38
x
$32.00 =
$1,216
Sr. Scientist
172
x
$26.50 =
$4,558
Bridge Tech Lead
210
x
$70.00 =
$14,700
Constr. Engr
184
x
$40.00 =
$7,360
Sr. Scientist
68
x
$28.25 =
$1,921
Scientist
172
x
$19.25 =
$3,311
Sr. Bridge Engr.
34
x
$55.00 =
$1,870
Sr. Prof Eng
312
x
$43.50 =
$13,572
Office Engr
758
x
$40.00 =
$30,320
Graphic Splts
48
x
$18.00 =
$864
Dsgnr/Tech
346
x
$23.00 =
$7,958
Dsgnr/Tech
238
x
$25.00 =
$5,950
RES
345
x
$36.50 =
$12,593
Acct'g Mngr
52
x
$20.50 =
$1,066
Admin. Asst.
330
x
$19.00 =
$6,270
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $138,703
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 170.78% x $138,703 = $236,877
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 32% x $138,703 = $44,385
REIMBURSABLE&
Travel to Ft Worth & Omaho
$4,000
Meals
$400
Lodging
$1,200
Mileage/Co. vehicle ($0.36/mile)
$2,065
Postage/Delivery
$1,250
Supplies
$550
Film Developing
$340
WDFW etc Data
$200
Planning Documents
$200
CADD @ $10/hr
$2,480
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST = $12,685
GRAND TOTAL: _ $432,650
Prepared By: Date: January 16, 2003
Exhibit G-2
DESCRIPTION
ired Labor
Total fn6aect Labor
Total Labor Burdett
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. .
Computation of the: _ Actual Ovedwad Rate
FYE 2001 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS ALLOWABLE
14,315,300 368,334 13.946.966
Promotion and Selling
Total Public Relations
Total Se#tirlg
Total Promotion and Selling
Admirlislrative Expenses
Occupancy
CArtxtxmicabons
Supplies
R"cations & Memberships
Total Computer & Printer Costs
Wide Expenses
General Administrative
Training Expenses
Employee Recruitirng & Retention
Professional Services
Business Insurance
Taxes, Licenses and Fees
Depredation and Amortization
Bad Debt Expenses
Contributions
Miscellaneous Expenses
401 K & ESOP Contributions
Profit Sharing Expenses
Interest Expense
Finance Charges
Gain or Loss on Sale of Fired Assets
Rental Income-Extemal
Miscellaneous Other Income
Income Taxes
Total Administrative Expense
Total AD Overhead Expenses
Labor Mark-up Ratios
Diced Labor for FYE 2001
Total Company Overhead Rate for FYE 2001
FAR Allowable Overhead Rate for FYE 2001
FYE 2001 Labor Burden
FYE 2001 General and Administration
FYE 2001 Overhead Rate
15.085.015
0
213.446
213,446
509,011
107,861
722 457
321,307
4.395,421
9732"
2,738,992
352.2W
1,226,002
1,265,915
947,879
782,329
1.183,625
1,432,047
939.394
588,220
1.698.252
1.632.677
128.410
(283)
550.026
2.160,179
763.709
380
(291.105)
(78.529)
(103Z85)
$53.725,126
$29,323,805
$53,725,126
$49,622.743
0
0
46.009
5.338
0
286,805
7,700
0
272.197
0
23,591
0
12,831
1,632,677
128.410
0
0
0
763.709
380
0
0
(81.970)
315,067
3,412.743
$4.102.383
Divide by
Divide by
15.085.015 1
0
401.150
4.395,421
973,2W
2-692,983
346,872
1.226.002
979.111
940,179
782,329
911.428
1.432,047
915,803
588.220
1,685.421
O
0
(2831
550,026
2.160,179
0
0
(291.105'
(78.529'
(21.315
1,525
20.189,612
$49,622,743
$29.323.805
S29.323.805
BASIS FOR
FYE 2001
13,946,966
15.085,015
0
401.150
401.150
4,395,421
973,299
2.M983
346.872
- 1,226,002
979,111
940,179
78Z329
911,428
1,432,047
915,803
588,220
1.685,421
0
0
(283)
550,026
2.160,179
0
0
(291.105)
(78.529)
(21.315)
1,525
20.189.612
549,622,743
18321%
169.22%
$15.085.015
Divide by
S29.323.805
51-44%
$34.537.728
Divide by
S29.323.805
117-78%
$49,622,743
Divide by
S29,323,805
169.22%
Seet��ond�L
/<�� %0
70
s lad-a,ea/o�eft ead/p ov.&.onaU2001 overt,ead Rate - q:efd.XLS
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
123
x
$59.00 =
$7,257
Assoc
18
x
$42.00 =
$756
Sr. Pr. Mgr
357
x
$30.00 =
$10,710
Pr. Mgr
75
x
$26.00 =
$1,950
Proj Engr
820
x
$22.00 =
$18,040
Graphic Artist
89
x
$19.00 =
$1,691
Proj. Asst
117
x
$17.00 =
$1,989
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $42,393
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 195.30% x $42,393 = $82,794
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 30% x $42,393 = $12,718
REIMBURSABLE&
Drilling Segment 1
$26,100
Drilling Segment 2
$5,600
Concrete and Asphalt Coring
$1,725
Street Traffic Control (signs) and 5 days RR flagl
$4,890
Mileage/Co. vehicle ($0.36/mile)
$800
Equipment Rental and Supplies
$5,300
Copying
$500
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST = $44,915
GRAND TOTAL: _ $182,820
Prepared By:_ �C(� Date: January 16, 2003
'
Exhibit G-2
Shennon & Wilson, Inc.
Provisional FAR Part 31 Allowable Overhead Rate
Calendar Year 2002
Based on 2001 Actuals
Percent of
Direct Labor Base
5.821,033.86
Direct Labor
Labor Overhead
Additional Compensation
15,015.54
0.3%
Retirement Fund
0.00
0.0%
Vacation,Sick, Holiday
685,988.96
11.8%
Payroll Fringes
1,311,770.53
22.5%
2.012,775.03
34.6% 34.6%
General and Administration
From
Less FAR
Less Direct
Adjusted
Financials
Unallowable
Labor OH
Expenses
Administrative Salaries
2,639.215.92
" 7.277.80
2,646,493.72
45.5%
Proposal and Bus Dev Labor
1,593,203.92
(308,850.34)
1,284.353.58
22.1%
Vacation Holiday Sick
1.149,225.89
(685,988.96)
463.236.93
8.0%,
Fringes on Gt3A Salaries
2.259,265.53
(61.678.19)
(1,311.770.53)
885,816.81
15.2%
Profit Sharing
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Equipment Expense
(106.436.96)
(166,436.96)
.1.8%
Rent and Facility Expense
1,400,707.71
(20,975.00)
1,379.731.71
23.7%
Travel and Auto Expense
144.901.96
144,901.96
2 5%
Proposal and Bus Dev Expense
3i9,411.65
(111.391.54)
208,020.11
3.6%
Interest
231,665.48
(231,665.48)
0.00
0.0%
Supplies
192.667.45
192,667.45
3.3%
Outside Prof and Tech Services
241,395.56
(6,396.91)
234,998.65
4.0%,
Computer Expenses
l 14.448.28
114.448.28
2.0%
Telephone and Postage
368,369.78
368.369.78
6.3%
Conferences and Professional Actfi
186,427.14
186,427.14
3.2%
DepreclaUon
440,258.75
440,258.75
7.6%
Insurance
326,733.42
326,733.42
5.6%
Taxes and Licenses
237.792.14
(4,041.00)
233,751.14
4.0%
Miscellaneous
438.423.27
(96,150.27)
342.273.00
5.9%
Bad Debt
108.801.18
(108,801.18)
0.00
0.0%
Additional Compensation
25,155.28
(15,015.54)
10,139.74
0.2%,
12,311,633.35
(942,673.11)
(2,012,775.03)
9,356,185.21
160.7% 160.7%
11.368,960.24
195.3% 195.3%
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
18
x $53.05 =
$955
Sr. Pr. Mgr
96
x $46.55 =
$4,469
Proj Engr
88
x $26.78 =
$2,357
Dsgnr/Tech
44
x $23.06 =
$1,015
Proj. Asst
6
x $18.84 =
$113
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $8,909
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 165.31% x $8,909 = $14,727
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 32% x $8,909 = $2,851
REIMBURSABLES:
Plotting $20
Mileage/Co. vehicle ($0.36/mile) $73
CADD @ $10/hr $440
Outside REIMBURSABLES $40
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST =
GRAND TOTAL:
Prepared By: Cl�
$573
$27,060
Date: January 16, 2003
rriuc CJL
Exhibit G-2
CIVILTECH CORPORATION
Breakdown of Overhead Cost
2001
Direct Labor
Fringe Benefits
FICA
Unemployment and Industrial Insurance
Group Insurence
Comp Time
Vacation, Holiday & Sick
Employee Benefits
Total Fringe Benefits
General Overhead
State B&O
General Admin Salaries
Other Indirect Salaries
Office Maintenance & Supplies
Personnel Recuitement
Printing, Stationary and Reproduction
Professional Development
Leagal and Accountant
Professional Services, Consultants
Insurance
Dues, License, and Permit
Postage and delievery
Rent
Depreciation
Equipment Repair & Maintenance
Telephone
Travel and Auto Expenses
Meal and Entertainment
Total General Overhead
Office Rate
Amount Percent
$495,242.81
$59,740.42
12.06%
$9,779.49
1.97%
$36,733.81
7.43%
$11,022.17
2.23%
$63,554.16
12.83%
$31,486.36
6.36%
42.88%
$19,337.17
3.90%
$186,788.79
37.72%
$177,552.06
35.85%
$32,108.80
6.48%
$11,387.12
2.30%
$3,741.73
0.76%
$9,754.42
1.97%,
$5,756.49
1.16%
$8,670.17
1.75%
$15,244.32
3.08%
$4,938.86
1.00%
$4,549.41
0.92%
$69,780.28
14.09%
$11.316.00
2.28%
$21,564.61
4.35%
$9,247.57
1.87%
$11,734.23
2.37%
$2.848.70
0.58%
122.43%
Grand Total 165.31 %
rrvjec[: Ntrander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
C. Hough -Beck
10
x $51.50 =
$515
F. Beck
32
x $47.50 =
$1,520
J. Howard
124
x $27.75 =
$3,441
J. Anderson
108
x $17.85 =
$1,928
D. Koonts
40
x $17.35 =
$694
S. Wallmark
10
x $16.30 =
$163
TOTAL HOURLY COST =
$8,261
OVERHEAD (OH COST
- including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC
196.27% x $8,261 =
$16,214
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC
32% x $8,261 =
$2,644
REIMBURSABLES:
Reproduction
$725
Mileage/pers. Vehicle @ $.36/mile $50
Postage/Delivery
$150
Supplies
$25
Graphics Related Costs
$125
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST =
$1,075
GRAND TOTAL: _ $28,194
PreparedBy:( Date: January 16, 2003
Exhibit G-2
Inn at V, LVVVVL.JLTJ
Hough Beck & Baird Inc.
Overhead Computation
Based on 2M Results
OVERHEAD COSTS (see below)
DERECTSALA.RIES (see below)
Direct Salaries
Corporate Officars
59,509.94
Othar amployeae
196,653.81
Total
256,163.82
Overhand Casts
Indirect Salaries- Principal
77,606.17
Indirect Salaries - Employees
122,661.85
Temporary Help
0.00
Hol idayo
10.962.16
Vacation
41.500.57
Sick Leave
6,760.31
Payroll Taxes
42,231.42
Employers PIG Tax (Soe Sec)
Federal Unemployrrient
Employ. Security (SUTA)
Dept. of Labot & Induet. ..
Disability Insurance
4348.08
Health Can Insurance
9,863.87
Payroll Processing Expense
1,194.65
Prof Dev (Educ & Seminars)
485.00
Prof Registration do Duet
2,960.20
Rcnt
69,092.00
Office Supplies & Periodicals
21,588.38
Tel ephone/Commuaiealions
9,626.62
Post age/Del ivvy/Sdipping
1,937.24
Repairs and Maintenance
3,776.51
Office Printing & Repro.
3,876,19
Other Office Expense
3,559.55
Legal
110.05
AccouutireAuditlrax Prep.
250.00
Computer Consultants
681.55
Prof Liability Ins Premiums
11,852.80
Other Ins Premiums
987.30
Misc. Tax/Licaaase Feea/Othar
15,009.58
Automobile Expense
5,806.53
Automobile Licensing
354.00
Travel & Lodging (eon-roimb)
1,544.22
Meals: Staff Mtg/Githerings
6,548.87
Mileage, Puking, Bus
4,921.62
Depreciation
10,600.00
Reprlats/Photos/Publlcations
9.863.06
Total Expense: 502,770.35
Overhead Factor 196.279ry
38,950.31
762.22
1,110.16
1,408.73
I A
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
Sr Sci / PM
50
x $45.67 =
$2,284
Proj Scientist
32
x $31.25 =
$1,000
Sr. Staff Sci
132
x $25.48 =
$3,363
Staff Sci
60
x $20.43 =
$1,226
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $7,873
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 157.00% x $7,873 = $12,361
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 32% x $7,873 = $2,519
REIM BURSABLES:
Mileage/pers. Vehicle @ $.36/mile $100
Supplies $200
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST =
GRAND TOTAL:
Prepared By:
$300
$23,053
Date: January 16, 2003
I ' l
MFG, Inc. FY 2001 Overhead Tabulation
Prepared 1/8/2002
Exhibit G-2
Admin Unallowed
10/1/2000 - Direct Labor indirect Labor Labor Burden Expense Expense
Income/Expense Category 9/30/2001 Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation
Direct Expenses
Direct Salaries & Wages
$6,235,210.76
$6,235,211
Subcontracts
$4,535,881.05
Intercompany Subcontractor Exp
$479,104.23
Materials & Supplies
$1,043,226.95
Travel & Subsistence
$842,236.09
Meals and Per Diem
$104,538.69
Non -Billable Labor
$112,551.22
$112,551 j
Total Direct Expenses
$13,352,748,99
Employee Expenses
Indirect Salaries & Wages
$3,657,357.31
$3,657,357
Vacation Expense
$542,163.34
$542,163
Discretionary Expense
$325,000.00
;
$325,000
Opt Out Dollars
$4,953.09
$4,953
Payroll Tax Expense
$817,527.14
$817,527
401k Matching Expense
$243,776.41
$243,776
Workmen's Comp. Insurance
$22,908.00
$22,908
Insurance-H/UAD&D/D
$531,068.84
$531,069
Dental Insurance
$48,937.46
$48,937
Total Employee Expenses
$6,193,691.59
Indirect Expenses
Contract Labor
$33,693.51
$33,694
Rent
$989,745.52
j
$989,746
Utilities
$56,807.15
$56,807
Repair & Mnt. - Building
$42,558.03
$42,558
Office Equipment Lease
$13,334.19
j
$13,334
Copier Lease
$78.934.93
$78,935
Telephone Lease
$16,319.98
$16,320
Repair & Mnt. - Equipment
$32,052.74
i
$32,053
Automobile Lease
$26,894.90
$13,447
$13,447
Repair & Mnt. - Vehicle
$63,884.34
$31,942
$31,942
Office Supplies
$179,514.32
$179,514
Computer Hardware & Software
$107,366.20
I
$107,366
Office Fixtures & Equipment
$26,153.07
$26,153
Equipment Expense
$6,622.35
$6,622
Field Supplies
$80,353.66
$80,354
Telephone & Fax
$302,072.94
$302,073
Ship./Overnight Del. & Postage
$75,067.90
$75,068
Reproduction & Printing
$64,083.64
$64,084
Travel & Lodging
$209,589.19
$209,589
Meals & Entertainment
$43,202.13
$43,202
Meals 100% Deductible
$27,374.69
;
$27,375
Client Entertainment
$39,156.10
!
$39,156
Insurance - Automobile
$846.00
$846
Insurance - General Corporate
$98,022.35
j
$98,022
Advertising & Promotion
$28,833.29
i
$28,833
Charitable Contributions
$11,290.25
$11,290
Legal & Accounting
$48,329.28
;
$48,329
Consulting Services
$60,533.18
$60,533
Dues & Publications
$45,547.72
$45,548
Seminars & Education
$51,674.10
i
$51,674
Health & Medical Training
$18,553.49
I
$18,553
Page 1 of 2
Printed 1113/03
MFG, Inc. FY 2001 Overhead Tabulation
Prepared 1/8/2002
Admin Unallowed
10/1/2000 - Direct Labor indirect Labor Labor Burden Expense Expense
Income/Expense Cateqory 9/30/2001 Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation
Physicals
$25,979.89
$25,980
Recruiting Expense
$8,765.05
F
$8,765
Employee Moving Expense
$27,580.59
$27,581
Office Moving Expense
$7,641.95
$7,642
Depreciation Expense
$309,028.65
$309,029
Irvine Depreciation IDT Expens
$9,782.00
$9,782
Permits & Licenses
$7,093.45
$7,093
Property & Misc. Taxes
$55,845.35
$55,845
Franchise Taxes
$27,175.59
$27,176
Sales Tax
$1,295.29
$1,295
Bank Charges
$563.71
$564
Penalty Expense
$1,053.31
$1,053
Miscellaneous Expense
$10,047.45 j
$10,047
Write-off Expense
$33,434.00
$33,434
Corporate Fee
$376,689.59
$376,690
Indirect Expense Allocation
$682.83
$683
Total Indirect Expenses
$3,781,069.84
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense $1,096.49 11 $1,096
Income Taxes
Federal Income Tax Expense
$873,754.91
Income Tax - State
$225,485.15
$225,485
Total Income Taxes
$1,099,240.06
Totals
$6,347,762
$3.691,051
$2,536,334
$3,738,450
$9 18
Summary of Prnvisinnnl Rntoc nnllnrc Rnfo1&An1finlior
Direct Labor
$6,347,761.98
100.00%
Labor Burden
$2,536,334.28
39.96%
General & Administrative
$7,429,500.86
117.04%
Combined Provisional Rate
$9,965,835.14
157.00%
Page 2 of 2 Printed 1113/03
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
50
x $44.57 =
$2,229
Historian
24
x $25.75 =
$618
Field Director
80
x $18.95 =
$1,516
Research Archy.
56
x $21.68 =
$1,214
Grapliics/WP
26
x $16.39 =
$426
TOTAL HOURLY COST = $6,003
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 88.00% x $6,003 = $5,283
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC 32% x $6,003 = $1,921
REIMBURSABLES:
Reproduction $175
Mileage/pers. Vehicle @ $.36/nine $183
Postage/Delivery $25
Supplies $75
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST = $458
GRAND TOTAL: _ $13,665
Prepared By:_ Date: January 16, 2003
Exhibit G-2
Exhibit B
Larson Anthropological & Archaeological Services
Overhead Schedule
December 31, 2000
Proposed
Amount
Adjusted
to GL
Adjusted
Amount
Audit Adj.
Ref.
Audited
Amount
%
Direct Labor Base
$349,421
-$7,673
$341,748
-$17,334
B, C
$324,414
Fringe Benefits (Direct Labor)
Payroll Taxes
$38,893
-$9,486
$29,407
A
$29,407
9.06%
Health Insurance
7,803
7,803
7,803
2.41%
Vacation & Holiday Pay
22,989
-6,559
16,430
A, B
16,430
5.06%
Pension
48,054
48,054
48,054
14.81 %
Total Fringe Benefits (Direct Labor)
$117,739
-$16,045
$101,694
$0.00
$101,694
31.35%
General Overhead Expenses
Indirect Salaries
$32,204
$14,232
$46,436
-$12,666
A, B, C
$33,770
10.41%
Bonuses
51113
5,113
30,000
C
35,113
10.82%
Training
3,231
3,231
-2,099
N, P
1,132
0.35%
Travel
1,208
1,208
-1,193
N, O
15
0.00%
Legal & Proffesional
4,038
4,038
-1,478
L, M
2,560
0.79%
Professional Licenses & Dues
2,005
2,005
-500
Q
1,505
0.4(
Reproduction
825
825
825
0.25 ,.,
Telephone
8,443
8,443
8,443
2.60%
Postage
617
617
-63
R
554
0.17%
Office Supplies
16,658
16,658
-1,368
D, N, R
15,290
4.71%
Depreciation - Office Equipment
5,072
5,072
5,072
1.56%
Office Rent
31,550
31,550
-2,000
D
29,550
9.11%
Maintenance & Repair
3,827
3,827
3,827
1.18%
Automobile depreciation
3,550
3,550
3,550
1.09%
Vehicle expense
11,406
11,406
-6,117 A, G, N, Q
5,289
1.63%
Insurance
12,344
12,344
12,344
3.81%
Bank Charges
134
134
-29
E
105
0.03%
Company Functions- Empl. Morale
1,821
1,821
-1,427
H,1, J, K
394
0.12%
Utilities
1,217
1,217
-24
D
1,193
0.37%
Consultants
30,539
30,539
-2,000
F
28,539
8.80%
Field Supplies
16
16
16
0.00%
Workman's Comp
2,090
2,090
2,090
0.64%
B&O Taxes
6,793
6,793
6,793
2.09%
Film Supplies
112
112
112
0.03%
Total General Overhead Expenses
$173,407
$25,638
$199,045
-$962
$198,083
61.06%
Total Overhead Expenses
$291,146
$9,593
$300,739
-$962
$299,777
92.41%
Overhead Rate
83.32%
1 88.007/6
92.41%
Audit Report No. 01-045 Page 10 Exhibit B
r
Project: Strander Boulevard - Phase 1
Client: City of Renton/Perteet Engineering, Inc.
I
HOUR ESTIMATE
Classification
Hours Rate
Cost
Principal/PM
70 x $55.00 =
$3,850
Assoc
50 x $53.50 =
$2,675
Proj Engr
16 x $28.00 =
$448
Proj. Asst
21 x $14.00 =
$294
TOTAL HOURLY COST =
$7,267
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC
130.10% x $7,267 =
$9,454
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate X DSC
32% x $7,267 =
$2,325
REIMBURSABLE&
Reproduction
$400
Mileage/pers. Vehicle @ $.36/mile $150
Postage/Delivery
$250
Supplies
$300
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST =
$1 100
GRAND TOTAL: _ $20,146
Prepared By: Date: January 16, 2003
Exhibit G-2
DMJM+HARRIS
PROJECTED INDIRECT RATES
U.S. HOME OFFICE
FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
DIRECT LABOR 84,713,224 89,796,017 95,183,778 100,894,805 106,948,493
PAYROLL BURDEN AND FRINGE
VACATION, SICK LEAVE & HOLIDAY
PAYROLL TAX EXPENSE
WORKERS COMPENSATION
GROUP INSURANCE EXPENSE
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
PENSION EXPENSE
ESOP EXPENSE
OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
TOTAL
INDIRECT LABOR
INDIRECT/OVERHEAD NON LABOR
RENT AND OCCUPANCY COSTS
INSURANCE
CONSULTANTS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES
BID AND PROPOSAL
HOME OFFICE ALLOCATION
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL AND LIVING ALLOWANCES
COMMUNICATIONS
EMPLOYEE RELOCATION
REPRODUCTION AND WORD PROCESSING
LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS
MEMBERSHIPS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES
RECRUITING
RECOVERIES AND MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
12,309,913
13,048,508
13,831,418
14,661, 303
15, 540, 982
8,984,855
9,523,947
10,095,383
10,701,106
11,343,173
276,605
293,202
310,794
329,441
349,208
7,447,891
8,447,398
9,222,869
10,069,529
10,993,911
2,248,824
2,383,754
2,526,779
2,678,385
2,839,089
3,865,836
3,978,958
4,553,931
5,163,403
5,809,443
2,361,494
2,776,578
2,935,946
3,104,589
3,283,049
1,489,203
1,673,049
1,773,432
1,879,838
1,992,629
38,984,622
42,125,393
45,250,554
48,587,595
52,151,482
(1) 22,323,211
23,663,612
25,084,478
26,590,638
28,187,210
13,675,680
14,277,459
15,164,890
16,106,366
17,105,154
2,230,286
2,364,103
2,505,949
2,656,306
2,815,684
3,371,922
3,574,237
3,788,692
4,016,013
4,256,974
1,651,038
1,750,100
1,855,106
1,966,412
2,084,397
(1) 9,601,548
10,133,939
10,742,849
11,388,329
12,072,574
605,742
905,390
928,931
953,083
977,863
1,831,676
1,941,577
2,058,071
2,181,556
2,312,449
2,184,524
2,315,595
2,454,531
2,601,803
2,757,911
6,568,022
6,962,104
7,379,830
7,822,620
8,291,977
3,434,543
3,640,616
3,859,053
4,090,596
4,336,032
504,584
534,859
566,951
600,968
637,026
1,277,718
1,354,381
1,435,643
1,521,782
1,613,089
1,229,547
1,303,320
1,381,519
1,464,410
1,552,275
818,895
868,029
920,111
975,317
1,033,836
1,755,808
1,861,156
1,972,826
2,091,195
2,216,667
457,618
485,075
514,180
545,030
577,732
(1,602,867)
(1,699,039)
(1,800,982)
(1,909,040)
(2,023,583)
49,596,283
52,572,900
55,728,148
59,072,746
62,618,056
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
110,904,117
118,361,906
126,063,180
134,250,978
142,956,749
INDIRECT/OVERHEAD COST RATE
130.9%
131.8%
132.4%
133.1%
133.7%
(1) Excludes compensation > $374,228
49,596,283 52,572,900 55,728,148 59,072,746 62,618,056
0 0 0 (0) (0)
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
gnn'A _,2nnR CIX_YFAP TIP
SR 167 I/C / SW 27th St / Strander By Corridor
Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317
Proj. Length: 0.8 miles Proj: 12138
RANK: 7 CONTACT: Nick Afzali 425-430-7245
DESCRIPTION:
Design and construct a new HOV exclusive interchange at SR 167 and SW 27th Street,
arterial HOV lanes on SW 27th Street and the extension of SW 27th Street to SR 181 at
Strander Boulevard. Includes roadway, structures, curbs, sidewalks, drainage, traffic signals,
lighting, signing and channelization and pedestrian/bicycle facilities.
JUSTIFICATION:
Serves the Valley, including the Boeing Longacres site, where TDM will be an important element
in addressing increasing traffic volumes. Allows HOV's to bypass the other congested ramps,
arterials and intersections in the Valley. Completes a missing arterial link that will provide a
direct connection to theTukwila Transit Center Longacres Commuter and Inter -city Rail Station.
STATUS:
Previous ISTEA grant of $344,000. Regional TEA-21 grant application for
$746,000 for SW 27th St connection to Strander Blvd awarded, but not obligated.
May receive funding in 2003 or 2004. Working with Sound Transit and Tukwila
to include a private developer transit oriented development on west end.
CHANGES:
Pre -design (Project Definition Study) was completed in March 2002. A consultant
will be selected for 30% design or possibly full design depending on funding.
The design and construction costs shown reflect Segment 1 only (West Valley
Highway to Oakesdale Ay SW). The WSDOT 1-405 Corridor Study has programmed
$40 M for the Interchange.
Fun a 14,186,384 JUnFunded : 142,8T3,616
Project Totals
Programmed Pre-2003
Six Year Program
ITEM
Programmed
Spent Pre-2002
2002
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
EXPENSES:
Project Development
395,386
225,386
140,000
30,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Precon En /Admin
5,082,517
11,220
71,297
5,000,000
600,000
1,400,000
500,000
2,500,000
R-O-W includes Admin
7,822,097
7,822,097
1,000,000
6,822,097
Construction Contract Fee
32,000,000
32,000,000
14,000,000
18,000,000
Construction En /Admin
1,700,000
1,700,000
1,700,000
Other
TOTAL EXPENSES
47,000,000
236,606
211,297
46,552,097
610,000
1,410,000
510,000
3,500,000
20,822,097
191,700,000
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
1/2 Cent Gas Tax
Business License Fee
1,517,496
2,662
30,434
1,484,400
46,300
40,000
468,000
228,800
421,300
280,000
Vehicle License Fee
975,419
975,419
148,419
42,000
350,000
200,000
235,000
Grants In -Hand
344,000
8,558
88,985
246,457
170,876
75,581
Mitigation In -Hand
1,349,469
225,386
91,878
1,032,205
392,824
400,000
239,381
L.I.D.'s Formed
Other In -Hand
Grants Proposed (TEA-21AC)
746,000
746,000
746,000
Mitigation Proposed
L.I.D.'s Proposed
Other Proposed
Undetermined
SO RC ES
42,067,616
47,000,000
236,606
211,297
42,067,
46,552,097
610,000
1,410,000
2,681,819,
3,500,00020TOTA
20,200,797
822,097
19,185,000
19,700,000
FtrenWr
5-7 FINAL
CITY OF RENTON
FEB 2 7 2003
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
oqHNSMONROEMITSUNAGA P L L C
TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM
Date: February 26, 2003
To: City of Renton
Clerk of the Council
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Patricia Wilson v. Planning/Building/Public Works Dept.
No. E9600757
Enclosure: Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal of Hearing Examiner Report and Decision
CUk Rdi" P"*."" Plal PX 01—OY7)
Enclosed for filing in this matter is our Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal of Hearing Examiner
Report and Decision. The original appeal in this matter was submitted on January 14, 2003.
Also enclosed is an' additional copy and return envelope with the request that it be date stamped
when received and returned to our office.
Thank you kindly.
CITY OF RENTON
� -I I * III * "'
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON
Patricia Wilson,
Appellant,
VS.
Planning/Building/Public.Works Department,
Respondent.
FEB 2 7 2003
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK 9 OFFICE
NO. E9600757
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF
APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER
REPORT AND DECISION
Appellant Patricia Wilson, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby
withdraws her Appeal of the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision, dated January 13,
2003.
-I-b
DATED this day of , 2003.
JO S MONROE MITSUNAGA, PLLC
1810-1 Wd of Appeal 2-26-03
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OFAPPEAL
PAGE 1OfI ORIGINAL.
By v ,
Ro ert D. Johns, WSBA #70 6
Duana T. Kolouskova, WSBA #27532.
Attorneys for Appellant
JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 110 Ave. SE, Suite 102
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Tel: (425) 4512812 / Fax (425) 4512818
Post Office Box 626 - Renton; Washington 98057 - (425) 255-8678 / FAX (425) 255-5474 R E N T .lr
This paper contains 50% recycfed material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE C yj.!ty E
4 1 " 1.
1. less: Grantee shall have the right to use the right-of-way for emergency access.
2. [Trantnr's t se nf R igh -nt_ f-W T: Grantor reserves the right to use the right-of-way
for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted, provided that Grantor. shall not
construct or maintain any building or other structure on the right-of-way which would interfere with
the exercise of the rights herein granted.
3. Ohstnictinns and Lands .aning: Grantee may from time to time remove trees,
bushes, or other obstructions within the right-of-way and may level and grade the right-of-way to
the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof, provided,
that following any such work, Grantee shall, to the extent reasonably practical, restore the right-of-
way to the condition it was immediately prior to such work.
4. IndemnitT By accepting and recording.this Easement, Grantee agrees to indemnify
and hold harmless Grantor from any and all claims for damages suffered by any person which may
be caused by Grantee's exercise of the rights herein granted; provided, that Grantee shall not be
responsible to Grantor for any damages resulting from injuries to any person caused by acts or
omissions of Grantor.
5.- Snc .gsnrs and Assigns: The covenants herein contained shall run with the land and
are binding upon all subsequent owners thereof
+1\ 2.663
DATED this 13 day of 'FEB RU iN R , 4W2.
RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY
By: �---
Tom Tasa, Executive Director
EASEMENT - 2
a
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Property
Lot 1:
Lot 1 of Renton Senior Housing Short Plat, according to the plat thereof, recorded
in Volume 91 of Surveys, Page 265, records -of King County, Washington.
Situate in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of
Renton, King County, Washington. .
Lot 2:
Lot 2 of Renton Senior Housing Short Plat, according to the plat thereof, recorded
in Volume 91 of Surveys, Page 265, records of King County, Washington.
Situate in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of
Renton, King County, Washington.