Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 04/07/2003AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 7, 2003 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Municipal Arts Commission "Bravo" Award 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of March 24, 2003. Council concur. b. Mayor Tanner reappoints Edythe Gandy, 3807 NE 8th Ct., Renton, 98056; Lari White, 1315 S. Puget Dr., #C-21, Renton, 98055; and Glenda Williams, 15612 SE 144th St., Renton, 98059; to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for two-year terms expiring on 4/25/2005. Council concur. c. Community Services Department submits CAG-02-104, Police Evidence Storage Facility Sitework; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $1,663.91, commencement of the 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $12,107.64 to Hisey Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. d. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way in the vicinity of NE 2nd St. and Union Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Bresko Short Plat (SHP-02-132). Council concur. e. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way at the intersection of SE 31st St. and Kennewick Ave. SE to fulfill a requirement of the Nason Short Plat (SHP-01-153). Council concur. f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends approval of a contract with Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. for environmental review services for a Scoping and a preliminary draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone. The Boeing Company will pay for the environmental analysis. Council concur. g. Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of the 2002 carry forward ordinance in the amount of $19,886.600, which increases the 2003 Budget for various funds for the purpose of meeting 2002 obligations in 2003; increasing various funds to meet the requirements of salary and benefit labor agreements; and decreasing the 2003 general fund appropriation accordingly. Refer to Finance Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE). h. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Site Plan for the Renton Aquatic Center to be located at 1715 Maple Valley Hwy. (SA-02-147). Council concur. i. Human Services Division recommends concurrence with the Human Services Advisory Committee recommendation for adoption of revised policies for the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program. Refer to Community Services Committee. j. Technical Services Division recommends approval of the vacation petition by St. Anthony's Parish for the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and S. 4th Streets subject to conditions. Council concur. k. Transportation Systems Division recommends a three-day temporary road closure between May 1 and May 29, 2003, of Lake Washington Blvd. at Southport Blvd., and Southport Blvd. for railroad crossing upgrades by Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Council concur. (Set-9 for resolution.) 1. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a request by Peggy Wipf, 30655 Kanasket-Kangley Rd., Ravensdale, 98051, to place a DWI memorial sign in memory of her deceased son, Jason J. Wipf, on Rainier Ave. S., south of S. 4th Pl. Ms. Wipf will pay for the sign and installation. Council concur. in. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with HDR Engineering in the amount of $194,600 for the initial pre -design work for the Sunset Interceptor Phase H project. Council concur. n. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum #2 in the amount of $99,914 to CAG-02-210, contract with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. to include design modifications and additional geo-technical investigation work for the Maplewood Water Treatment.Improvements. Council concur. 7. CORRESPONDENCE E-mails received expressing interest in having an off -leash dog -park in Renton. OLD BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the chairman if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: Pavilion Building Renovation Project Bid Award b. Community Services Committee: Lease -Purchase Agreement for 40 Golf Carts; 2003 Housing Stability Program c. Finance Committee: Vouchers d. Planning & Development Committee: Fence Height Regulations; Airport Zoning e. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Sidewalk Utility Markings 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Resolution: Temporary Road Closure of Lake Washington Blvd. and Southport Blvd. (see 61.) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. ADJOURNMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) COMMrT7EE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 6:00 p.m. Emerging Issues Briefing; Boeing Environmental Impact Statement Update Council Chambers 6:45 p.m. Pavilion Building Renovation Project Bid Award • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM d COMMMEE OF THE WHOLE Correspondence regarding an off -leash dog park in Renton COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMMEE Housing repair assistance program policies FINANCE CONIMTI"TEE 2002 Carry Forward ordinance MAYOR AND CITY CLERK Execute golf cart lease -purchase agreement with CitiCapital Commercial Corporation TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) CONIlVITTTEE DWI memorial signs policy development RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 7, 2003 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TERRI BRIERE; KING COUNCILMEMBERS PARKER; DON PERSSON; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE LARRY WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator; DENNIS CULP, Facilities Director; LESLIE BETLACH, Parks Director; SYLVIA ALLEN, Recreation Director; KELLY BEYMER, Golf Course Manager; KAREN BERGSVIK, Human Services Manager; NEIL WATTS, Development Services Director; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER ROBERT SEELYE, Police Department. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Recreation Director, Sylvia Allen, introduced Municipal Arts Commission Board/Commission: Municipal members Diana Hagen, Doug Kyes, and Eleanor Simpson. Ms. Hagen Arts Commission 2003 announced that Vanecia Adderson, a charter member of the Valley Community BRAVO Award Players, was the recipient of the Municipal Arts Commission's 2003 BRAVO Award, which recognizes individuals and organizations that have made a significant contribution to the arts in the City of Renton. Ms. Hagen explained Ms. Adderson's aeronautics background and her contributions to the Renton community, including support of the Allied Arts of Renton and the IKEA Performing Arts Center, trustee of Community Opera Productions, and member of the production team for the 2001 Renton Centennial production, "Rentennial". Ms. Adderson accepted the framed certificate which was decorated with a drawing of her by artist Doug Kyes, and she expressed her appreciation for the award. In addition, Mr. Kyes presented the original portrait to Ms. Adderson's son, Jim Adderson. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: The Renton Public Library has a new web interface to their catalog that makes searching for materials from home even easier. The new website can be accessed by visiting the Spotlight section of the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, and clicking on the iPAC icon. This new site allows patrons to access their accounts to renew books, place holds, and check for items waiting for pickup. Cirque du Soleil will return to Renton this summer with their show Alegria. The grand chapiteau will be placed on Boeing Parking Lot 3 this summer and the Cirque's published schedule calls for an August 21st through September 14th run. Tickets will go on sale to the general public on April April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 123 27th at noon. Call 1-800-678-5440 or visit www.cirquedusoleil.com for information and tickets. The S. 180th St. Grade Separation project is progressing quite well despite the fact that March 2003 had twice the normal rainfall. The S. 180th/S.W. 43rd project is on track for opening in late May to early June., The project is now about 80% complete with 14 weeks to go until the July 14th required completion date. The plan is to continue with project finalization and punch list work after the roadway has been reopened to the public, so as to complete the construction by July 14th. AUDIENCE COMMENT Arland "Buzz" Johnson, 334 Wells Ave. S., #221, Renton, 98055, reported Citizen Comment: Johnson — another two-hour power outage that occurred last week, a problem which has Power Outages, Noise since been addressed by Puget Sound Energy. He expressed concern for the Problems handicapped residents in the building because of the unavailability of elevators during outages. Also, Mr. Johnson stated that a recent late -night party at McGowan's Restaurant resulted in noise. disturbance for area residents. He explained that the police officer responding to complaints handled the matter professionally and effectively, but he wanted Council to be aware of continuing disturbances at the establishment. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of March 24, 2003. Council concur. March 24, 2003 Appointment: Human Rights Mayor Tanner reappointed Edythe Gandy, 3807 NE 8th Ct., Renton, 98056; & Affairs Commission Lari White, 1315 S. Puget Dr., #C-21, Renton, 98055; and Glenda Williams, 15612 SE 144th St., Renton, 98059; each to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for two-year terms expiring on 4/25/2005. Council concur. CAG: 02-104, Police Evidence Community Services Department submitted CAG-02-104, Police Evidence Storage Facility Sitework, Storage Facility Sitework; and requested approval of the project, authorization Hisey Construction for final pay estimate in the amount of $1,663.91, commencement of the 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $12,107.64 to Hisey Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Development Services: Bresko Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Short Plat, ROW Dedication at dedication for additional right-of-way in the vicinity of NE 2nd St. and Union NE 2nd St & Union Ave NE Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Bresko Short Plat (SHP-02-132). (SHP-02-132) Council concur. Development Services: Nason Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Short Plat, ROW Dedication at dedication for additional right-of-way at the intersection of SE 31st St. and SE 31st St & Kennewick Ave Kennewick Ave. SE to fulfill a requirement of the Nason Short Plat (SHP-01- SE (SHP701-153) 153). Council concur. Planning: Boeing Renton Site Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department EIS Preparation, Blumen recommended approval of a contract with Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. for Consulting Group environmental review services for a Scoping and a preliminary draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone. The Boeing Company will pay for the environmental analysis. Council concur. April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 124 Budget: 2002 Carry Forward Finance and Information Services Department requested approval of the 2002 Ordinance carry forward ordinance in the amount of $19,886,600, increasing the 2003 Budget for various funds for the purpose of meeting 2002 obligations in 2003; increasing various funds to meet the requirements of salary and benefit labor agreements; and decreasing the 2003 general fund appropriation accordingly. Refer to Finance Committee. Development Services: Renton Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Site Plan for Aquatic Center Site Plan, SA- the Renton Aquatic Center to be located at 1715 Maple Valley Hwy. (SA-02- 02-147 147). Council concur. Human Services: Housing Human Services Division recommended concurrence with the Human Services Repair Assistance Program Advisory Committee recommendation for adoption of revised policies for the Policies City's Housing Repair Assistance Program. Refer to Community Services Committee. Vacation: Alley between Technical Services Division recommended approval of the vacation petition -by Whitworth & Morris Aves S, St. Anthony's Parish for the alley running north and south between Whitworth and S 3rd & S 4th Sts, St. and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and S. 4th Streets subject to the following Anthony's Parish, VAC-03- conditions: 1) the Petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof that outside . 001 utilities have been received, and are satisfied with any easements, which. are necessary to protect their facilities in the requested vacation area; 2).a utility easement of the City shall be retained over the entire alley being vacated; and 3) this vacation shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the St. Anthony's Parish Development Agreement. Council concur. Streets: Lake WA Blvd & Transportation Systems Division recommended a three-day temporary road Southport Blvd Closures for closure between May 1 and May 29, 2003, of Lake Washington Blvd. at RR Crossing Upgrades Southport Blvd., and Southport Blvd. for railroad crossing upgrades by Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Council concur. (See pg. 127 for resolution.) Transportation: DWI Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a request by Peggy Memorial Sign Installation on Wipf, 30655 Kanasket-Kangley Rd., Ravensdale, 98051, to place a DWI Rainier Ave S (Jason Wipf) memorial sign in memory of her deceased son, Jason J. Wipf, on Rainier Ave. S., south of S. 4th Pl..Ms. Wipf will pay for the sign and installation. Council concur. Utility: Sunset Interceptor Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a contract with HDR Phase 11 Pre -design, HDR Engineering in the amount of $194,600 for the initial pre -design work for the Engineering Sunset Interceptor Phase H project. Council concur. CAG: 02-010, Maplewood Utility Systems Division recommended approval of Addendum #2 in the Water Treatment amount of $99,914 to CAG-02-210, contract with Economic and Engineering Improvements Design, Services, Inc. to include design modifications and additional geo-technical Economic and -Engineering investigation work for the Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements. Services Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was reported from individuals expressing interest in having an Citizen Comment: Various — off -leash dog park in Renton including: Nona Peterson, 225 Vashon Ave. SE, Off -Leash Dog Park Renton, 98059;. Jennifer Garl, 2601 NE 9th St., Renton, 98056; Terry Angevine, 514 Burnett Ave. N., Renton, 98055; Nathan Thornton, 629 Cedar Ave S., #203, Renton, 98055; Roneida & Timothy Griffith, 550 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton, 98058; Jan Hickling, 527 Renton Ave. S., Renton, 98055; Bob & Nancy Prater, 412 Pelly Ave. N., Renton, 98055; Julie Hiatt, 1726 Pierce Ave. April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 125 SE, Renton, 98158; Vicki Dodge, 18622 SE Lake Youngs Rd, Renton, 98058, Chris Fleck, 6123 S. 242nd Pl., #12-205, Kent, 98032; Darren & Davida St. Yves, 16624 133`a Pl. SE, Renton, 98058; Jennifer Haines, Boulevard Lanes, SE 192nd St. & 140th Ave. SE, Renton; Dollie Meyers, 18919 140th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058; Sunny Kathlean, Fairwood area, Renton; Vicki Murphy, no address given; Elynn Clayton, 21429 113th Pl. SE, Kent; Dr. Timothy White, 12940 SE 185th St., Renton, 98058; and Shari Blevins, Seattle resident. Councilman Clawson explained that several citizens approached him about an off -lease dog park within the City at a recent Highlands Community Association meeting where the "KDOGS" from Kent were present. He stated that the citizens brought the issue to Council at his suggestion. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THESE ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report regarding the tracking of Committee of the Whole restrictive covenants required through the permit process. Until a few years Development Services: ago, covenants restricting the development of property were difficult to track. Tracking Restrictive Staff generally did not know if any restrictive covenants affected a property Covenants unless a title report was provided. Title reports are expensive for applicants and are only required for certain types of land use applications. At the end of 1999, staff completed a project cataloging and mapping all of the restrictive covenants required by the City. Staff can now research the covenants by consulting a map to identify affected properties. A corresponding database provides the recording number of the restrictive covenant, a legal description of the subject property, and a summary of the requirement of the covenants. In addition, the Permits Plus permit tracking system is utilized to document conditions of permit approval, including covenants. These conditions can be researched by project name, address or parcel identification number. Another tool developed by staff to track project conditions is a matrix summarizing the required conditions. Copies of this matrix are distributed to the contractors and inspectors at pre -construction meetings. The Committee recommended no further action be taken at this time. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: DWI Council President Keolker-Wheeler stated that in the process of reviewing Memorial Signs agenda items 6.1. it was noted that there currently is no policy in place regarding DWI (driving while intoxicated) memorial sign placement, and recommended that Council consider development of such a policy. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF DWI MEMORIAL SIGN POLICY DEVELOPMENT TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED Community Services: Council President Keolker-Wheeler advised that the Committee of the Whole Pavilion Building Renovation, meeting would continue at the conclusion of the Council meeting for further Edifice Const. Co., CAG-03- discussion concerning funding for the Pavilion Building. At the conclusion of 005 the Committee of the Whole meeting, Council would reconvene. April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 126 Community Services Community Services Chair Nelson presented a report recommending Committee concurrence in the Human Services Advisory Committee's recommendation to Human Services: 2003 CDBG continue participation in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Housing Stability Program Consortium Housing Stability Program in 2003. This program helps low to Participation moderate income families who are employed, who have had a temporary crisis in their lives, which results in the short-term inability to meet their rent or mortgage payment. The Renton Housing Stability Program cost of $21,355 for 2003 will be deducted from the public services amount received by Renton under the Joint Agreement with King County. Due to the increase in the amount of CDBG funding Renton will receive in 2003, funding this program will not decrease the amount of 2003 agency funding for public services previously approved by Council. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services: Golf Community Services Chair Nelson presented a report recommending Cart Lease -Purchase concurrence in the staff recommendation to execute a formal 36 (thirty-six) Agreement, CitiCapital month lease/purchase agreement with Club Car, Inc. (CitiCapital Commercial Commercial Corporation Corporation) for forty (40) gasoline powered golf carts. Forty (40) carts from the current fleet will be utilized as a trade-in. The City has the option at the end of the term to purchase the forty (40) carts for $1.00 each. The City's current fleet has a total of fifty (50) golf carts. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute this Lease/Purchase Agreement. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the unsightliness of utility locate marks left on sidewalks after Transportation: Sidewalk construction activity has been completed. In several cases these locate Utility Markings markings are left on new city sidewalks and can take considerable time to wear away. The Transportation/Aviation Committee requested staff develop a program to implement the removal of utility locate markings in the downtown core area as a pilot program. Removal of locate marks would be limited to sidewalks only. The permitee will be required to remove utility locate marks on sidewalks within the Downtown Core area, as shown in Appendix B of the 2002 City of Renton Zoning Map. The permitee shall remove the utility locate marks on sidewalks within fourteen 14 days of job completion. The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommended implementing code changes requiring the removal of utility locate marks on sidewalks within the Downtown Core Area, and adoption of a Resolution authorizing this matter to be presented at a later meeting. The Transportation/Aviation Committee further recommended that staff report back to the Committee after one year on the effectiveness of this pilot program, including any recommendations to modify or improve the new utility marks removal program. April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 127 MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 213714-214208 and two wire transfers totaling $2,063,530.77; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 43498-43733, one wire transfer and 569 direct deposits totaling $1,708,408.59. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report with Committee proposed changes to the maximum residential fence height regulations Development Regulations: established in Title IV. Fence Height Regulations Currently, City code limits residential fences to a maximum of four feet when they are located adjacent to a public street. The Planning and Development Committee met in April to discuss possible changes to the fence height regulations. The Committee recommended that a public hearing be conducted, which occurred on May 6, 2002. Committee members subsequently toured several residential neighborhoods in November and directed staff to address setback, landscaping and fencing material requirements. On January 10, 2003, the City Attorney's Office advised City Staff and the City Council that the proposed fence regulations were too "policy" oriented. In response to the City Attorney's comments, staff revised the proposed fence regulations to include more regulatory language. The revised fence standards would allow residents to apply for a Special Administrative Fence Permit in order to construct 6-foot high fences when located within a front yard or side yard along a street setback. The permits would be issued on a case -by -case basis provided the applicant demonstrates the fence is constructed with appropriate fencing material; the fence is sufficiently screened; and, the finished side of the fence is oriented toward the streetscape. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3627 A resolution was read authorizing the temporary closure of Lake Washington Streets: Lake WA Blvd & Blvd. at Southport Blvd., and of Southport Blvd. for a period of three days Southport Blvd Closures for (consecutive or non-consecutive) between May 1 and May 29, 2003, for RR Crossing Upgrades Burlington Northern Santa Fe to make improvements to railroad grade crossings at both locations. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Clawson referred to a newspaper article regarding the strain on Council: Smallpox local health departments administered by King County and the financial burden Vaccinations Funding Letter for smallpox vaccinations, and recommended Council draft a letter to elected Federal officials to support relief for city and county compliance. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL DRAFT LETTERS TO ELECTED OFFICIALS TO SUPPORT FUNDING FOR CITIES AND COUNTIES FOR SMALLPDX VACCINATIONS. CARRIED. April 7, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes .Page 128 Solid Waste: Hazardous Waste Council President Keolker-Wheeler advised that the King County Health Department plans to conduct a workshop on 4/18/2003 regarding the West Nile virus issue; and requested a briefing by City staff to the Committee of the Whole after attending the workshop. RECESS TO COMMITTEE MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS TO OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Time: 8:15 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:53 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers present. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report from the Committee of (Continued) the Whole concurring with the Administration's recommendation to complete Committee of the Whole the renovation of the Pavilion according to the final design which includes an Community Services: under floor plenum, glass curtain walls on the East and West ends of the Pavilion Building Renovation, building, and air-conditioning. The Committee recommended that the City Edifice Const. Co., CAG-03- Council authorize the Administration to expend the previously appropriated 005 $2,300,000. The Administration will return on April 21, 2003, for Council authorization to include the air-conditioning option once the funds are . identified to cover the remaining project cost ($292,112.81). The Committee of the Whole further recommended awarding the construction contract to Edifice Construction Company in the amount of 2,242,077.91. (The total project amount of $2,592,112.81 includes the bid and other soft costs). The Administration will find savings from capital funds or one-time moneys and from areas that will not impact delivery of essential City services. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:55 p.m. &.O� BONNIE 1. WALTON, City Clerk. Recorder: Suzann Lombard April 7, 2003 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 7, 2003 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA AD HOC COUNCIL TUES., 4/08 Electronic Mail and Correspondence COMMUNICATIONS 3:30 p.m. Policies (Briere) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 4/14 1st Quarter Financial Report (Keolker-Wheeler) 6:30 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE MON., 4/14 Carry Forward Ordinance (Parker) 5:30 p.m. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 4/14 CANCELLED (Clawson) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Persson) UTILITIES (Corman) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day to -day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Lasting Legacy Centennial Sculpture Emerging, by Hai Ying Wu, and the Centennial Time Capsule will be officially dedicated on Monday, April 140', at 4:30 p.m. outside Carco Theatre, located at 1717 Maple Valley Highway. A reception, hosted by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission, will be held in the lobby of Carco Theatre immediately following the dedication ceremony. • The Renton Public Library has a new web interface to their catalog that makes searching for materials from home even easier. The new website can be accessed by visiting the Spotlight section of the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, and clicking on the iPAC icon. This new site allows patrons to access their accounts to renew books, place holds, and check for items waiting for pickup. • Spring training has started for 88 athletes who will be competing in Special Olympic Track and Field, Soccer, and Cycling. They will train each Monday and Wednesday for the next two months. On Saturdays, the Cycling team will be at the fire training center. The goal of each athlete is to participate in the state competition at Fort Lewis at the end of May. • To date, 46 teams have registered for the adult spring softball leagues. The teams will be hitting the fields over the next few weeks preparing for games starting April 28"'. In addition, Renton ballfields will be busy as Little League season begins. Weather permitting, Ron Regis, Philip Arnold, Tiffany Park, Thomas Teasdale, Highlands, Kennydale, Kiwanis, and Maplewood Parks will all see action. • Volunteers are such a vital part of the City and are certainly appreciated! They donated 637 hours in March to the Recreation Services programs, including youth basketball coaches, Special Olympic coaches, Special Population programs (Thursday Social and Community Trip), class assistants, chaperones and assistants for the McKnight Teen Dance, and Renton Youth Council's assistance in preparing for the upcoming Hip Hoppin' Egg Hunt. At $7.01 an hour, these hours are valued at $4,465 of service to the community. At the Senior Activity Center during the first quarter of this year, 284 senior citizens volunteered a total of 5,490 hours, with an average of 95 volunteers working 1,830 hours per month. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Cirque du Soleil will return to Renton this summer with their show Alegria. The grand chapiteau will be placed on Boeing Parking Lot 3 this summer and the Cirque's published schedule calls for an August 20 through September 14t' run. Tickets will go on sale to the general public on April 27`h at noon. Call 1-800-678-5440 or visit www.cirguedusoleil.com for information and tickets. FIRE DEPARTMENT • Lt. Kris Weiland has been chosen as Firefighter of the Quarter. For the last ten years, he's been the driving force behind the Department's Haz Mat Team, and is regarded as an expert throughout King County. His dedication and work ethic are two reasons our Haz Mat team is the model that others try to emulate. Administrative Report April 7, 2003 Page 2 • In response to the tragic fire that killed 99 and injured at least 180 in a Rhode Island nightclub on February 20`h, the Fire Department is continuing a series of special inspections on all taverns and night entertainment spots throughout the city. These inspections are intended to be a serious and sincere effort to ensure that lives are not lost in a similar incident in Renton. In addition, these inspections are an opportunity to educate these business owners and managers about the potential hazards associated with assembly occupancies. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • Puget Sound Energy reported that they have located and replaced a damaged power conductor in the high voltage junction box located at the northeast corner of the Parker Paints parking lot in downtown Renton. This piece of equipment is believed to have caused seven power outages in a portion of downtown Renton since last October. Staff is preparing a more detailed briefing paper for Council on this subject. • The S. 180th St. Grade Separation project is progressing quite well despite the fact that March 2003 had twice the normal rainfall. The S. 18e/S.W. 43rd project is on track for opening in late May to early June. The project is now about 80% complete with 14 weeks to go until the July 14`h required completion date. The plan is to continue with project finalization and punch list work after the roadway has been reopened to the public, so as to complete the construction by July 14d. POLICE DEPARTMENT • During the week of April 8-14, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following areas: Renton Police Department Traffic Enforcement Emphasis April 8-14 Date 6:00 a.m. to Noon Noon to 6:00 p.m. All Da Motorcycles Cars Motorcycles Cars Radar Trailer April 8 S 40 & Mill/Cedar SW Sunset Blvd Oakesdale Ave SW Rainier Ave N Maple Valley Hwy Tuesday Stop sin Speed/turns Seed Seed April 9 Hoquiam Ave NE School Zones Edmonds Ave SE Maple Valley Hwy 3800 Lake Wash Blvd Wednesday Seed Seed Seed Seed April 10 1100 blk, Carr Rd Maple Valley Hwy Rainier Ave N 3800 blk, NE 12 St 3800 Lake Wash Blvd Thursday Seed Seed Seed April 11 S 4 & Mill/Cedar School Zones School Zones Maple Valley Hwy 3800 Lake Wash Blvd Friday Stop sin Seed Seed Seed April 14 Oakesdale Ave SW Lake Wash Blvd 1100 blk, Carr Rd Rainier Ave N 800 Union Ave NE Monday Seed I Seed I Seed Seed CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: For Agenda of: April 7 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS Department Staff Contact...... Jesse Tanner, Mayor Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing... Subject: Reappointments to Human Rights and Affairs Commission: Correspondence.. Edythe Gandy, Lari White, and Glenda Williams Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Tanner reappoints the following to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for two-year terms expiring on April 25, 2005: Edythe Gandy - address: 3807 NE 8`I' Ct., Renton, WA 98056; phone: 425-226-7993 Lari White - address: 1315 S. Puget Dr., #C-21, Renton, WA 98055; phone: 425-793-7100 Glenda Williams - address: 15612 SE 1441h St., Renton, WA 98059-7418; phone 425-255-9563 The other members of the Human Rights and Affairs Commission are: Vern Nichols, Sandel Demastus, Antonio Cube, Sr., Charles Thomas. 0 1 C CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board..... Community Services / Facilities Staff Contact........ Michael Nolan (x6608) SUBJECT: CAG-02-104 Police Evidence Storage Facility Sitework Hisey Construction EXHIBITS: • Final Pay Estimate ( No. 5) • Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract FOR AGENDA OF: April 7, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ................................. )()( Public Hearing ....................... Correspondence .................... Ordinance .............................. Resolution ............................. Old Business ......................... New Business ...................... - Study Session ....................... Information ............................ Other..................................... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Council concur. Legal Dept .................. Finance Dept .............. Other.......................... rISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required ............. $242,152.60 Transfer/Amendment........ Amount Budgeted .................. $250,000.00 Revenue Generated ......... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Community Services Department submits CAG-02-104, Police Evidence Storage Facility Sitework and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $1,663.91, commencement of the 60 day lien period, and release of retained amount of $12,107.64 to Hisey Construction, contractor, after any liens filed against the retainage have been resolved or all required releases have been received. rev. 8/13/93 AGENDA-Hisey.DOC STAO� State of Washington o Department of Revenue y s Audit Procedures & Administration PO Box 47474 y'� l889 a0 Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 Reg.No.: Date: NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract Police Evidence Storage Facility Sitework Contractor's Name Hisey Construction Phone No. (206) 842-7301 Contractor's Address PO Box 11380, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Date Work Commenced August 26, 2002 Date Work Completed March 10, 2003 Date Work Accepted April 8, 2003 Surety or Bonding Co. Traveler's Casualty and Surety Company of America Agent's Address Kirkland, WA Contract Amount: Additions or Reductions: Sales Tax: Total $ 192,000.00 $ 50,152.60 $ 21,309.43 $ $263,462.03 Phone No: Amount Disbursed: $ 251,354.39 Amount Retained: $ 12,107.64 Total: $ $263,462.03 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate_ FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) State Completion.doc DATE: 3 /3 1 /a 3 TO: Tracy Schuld, Finance Department 'ROM: Michael Nolan CONTRACTOR: Hisey Construction PROJECT NAME: Police Evidence Stoage Facility Sitework CONTRACT NO.: CAG-02-104 ESTIMATE NO. 5 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $1,603.00 2. SALES TAX @ 8.8% $141.06 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $1,744.06 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID 1. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE .2. SUBTOTAL * (95% x Line 1) ** (RETAINAGE @ 5%) GRAND TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION $228,522.11 $1,522.85 $12,027.49 $80.15 $21,168.37 $141.06 $230,044.96 $12,107.64 $21,309.43 $263,462.03 PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (LINES 5 AND 11) No. 5 $1,663.91 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020046 RETAINED AMOUNT (LINE 8) No. 5 $80.15 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020046 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $1,744.06 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM AUTH RIZED TO AUTHE7,y TE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM. SIGNED: `� 0 L -7., TC Ce(.e-m APPLI&TION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PWENT ClAdhRenton 777 TO OWNER: PROJECT: APPLICATION NO.: 5 Distribution to City of Renton Police Evidence Building, OWNER 200 Mill Avenue South Sitework PERIOD TO: 3/ 1.0/2003 ARCHITECT Renton, WA 98055 P CONTRACTOR PROJECT NO.: CAG-02-104 FROM CONTRACTOR: VIA ARCHITECT: Hisey Construction, Inc. Pacific Engineering Tech. PO Box 11380 1300 Dexter Ave N Bainbridge Island, WA 98.110 Seattle, WA 98109 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM .................................. $ 192,000.00 2. Net change by Change Orders ................... 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ......................... (Line 1 + or - Line 2) 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE 5. RETAINAGE AT 5%..................................................... (Based on line 4) 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .......................... (Line 4 less Line 5) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT.... (Line 6 from prior Certificate) 8 SUBTOTAL .................. $ 50,152.60 $ 242,152.60 $ 242.152.60 $ 12,1.07.63 $ 230,044.97 $ 228,522.12 $ 1,522.85 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Change Orders approved in previous months by owner $ 49,549.60 $ - C.'.O.'s approved this month $ 603.00 Number IDate Approved 5 3/11/2003 TOTALS $ 50,152.60 $ - Net changes by Change Orders 1 $ 50,152.60 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infor- mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payment received from the Owner, and thja-cprrent payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: (Line 6 less Line 7) 14(.064 B Date: 12 9. Washington State Sales Tax at 8.8...................... _ $-14i'r7A 23— (Based on line 4 less prior certificate's line 4) State of: Washi n, Cou King 10, CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................................... $ 1� G3'� t- Subscribed and to before me' (Line 8 plus Line 9) this I 1 day of MR2cN ,20G 11. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE...... $ 12,107.63 Notary Public : �1 . - ll• �—y i (Line 3 less Line 6) _ My Commission expires 1_Zo_OCj ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED .................................................... 1 (o (,9 .9 I (Attach explanation if amount c rtified differsfront amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: / H B `o Date: 3 31 This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL F.-6•C . Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: April 7, 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plats. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other. .. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a strip of land 3-feet wide along NE 2"d St. and a 15-foot radius at the intersection of Union Ave NE and, NE 2"d St. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the Bresko Short Plat, LUA-02-132, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. _STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2003\BreskoSHPL 04 AGNBILL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 152305-9078 Project File #: LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Street Intersection: Union Avenue NE & NE 2nd Street Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Adam Blaze Bresko, M riamY. Bresko 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page 2 ) A portion of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 23, Range 5 East, W.M, in the City of Renton, King County Washington. The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Adam Blaze Bresko Grantee(s): City of Renton (iai Y. Bresko j ` ' Mayor f City Clerk INDIIJIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNO`e.� Of � I�� 1j''' I certify thatOI know o have satisfactory evidence that �F KING 3"G���i N:. ���� Slt� S signed this instrument and ,%araRr acknowledged it to b s er/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned Jrthe instrument. Ai'CH„j.v�®~��`, Notary Public in and for he State of Washington N"OltiwAs```` Notary(Print) i M 20 My appointment expires: Dated: 3) aCv �at>o3 Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/bresk0 dedication doc\ GMS Page I FORM 04 0001/bh Project: Exhibit A WOt PID Legal Description GRANTOR: Street: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 170.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 90.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDMSION; THENCE S 0057'40" W ALONG THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 3.00 FEET; THENCE N 88015'59" W AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 149.73 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET AND BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°46'21 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.69 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE N 0057'40" E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 23.27 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE S 88015'59" E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 170.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING IN ALL 598.6 SQUARE FEET. t.. r � � wwsr �►Sl'6R�0 EXPIRES 6 / 30 / 0+ xror s/xx vvAGuE/breskodedicationdoc.doe\ BE Page 2 FORM 04 00011bh w W 4L 0 0 AvenueUnion �t Y S • • • -41 .I 03 0 v V • I V crl o0 D S00'57'26"W 87.00' -P v r� 1 � i 0) N v oD r— Wn 2 0' C7 c n m r rn O n 3.00'� cD = < Z D m 00 Z Np�D 00 -: . o�m c C11 O N :i m C11 \ `om 000 g y iV N 3 a c 0 D. cD ��Q � Z3 O�rnrn0 m am o cn n p1l, 70 Qom( wv fD Z �p CD Q (D oa C REPORT 8c DECISION City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST. REPORT DATE: January 2, 2003 Project Name Bresko Short Plat Applicant: Kevin H. Weare, CDS Associates 3840 W. Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA Owner Blaze Bresko 2124 Third Ave. Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98121 File Number LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Project Manager Susan Fiala Project Description Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for the three -lot subdivision of a 0.35- acre site located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Unit Per Acre (R-8) Zone. The subject site was developed with a mobile home which has been removed/demolished. Project Location 186 Union Avenue NE W o i _NC 1ST PL L LIA Project Location Map shplrpt_Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 2 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Blaze Bresko 2124 Third Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98121 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: The site was developed with a mobile home that has been recently removed/demolished. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single Family Residential (R-10 zone) East: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) West. Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) 6. Access: 7. Site Area: Via Northeast 2"d Street 16,820 square feet / 0.35 acres C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/1993 Annexation N/A 3570 08/24/1981 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water: There is an existing 12" watermain in Union Ave NE. There is also an 8" watermain in NE 2nd Street. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is 5200 gpm with a static pressure of 69 psi. The project is located in the 565-water pressure zone. There is a fire hydrant in the vicinity that is located within 300-feet of the nearest corner of the structures. Existing hydrant shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. Sewer: There is an existing 8" sewer main in NE 2nd Street. There is also an 8" sewer main in Union Ave NE. Surface Water/Storm Water: A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. According to the drainage report, the project would be under the threshold for water quality and detention. Z. Streets: There is curb/gutter fronting the parcel in NE 2nd Street. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations shplrpt Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 3 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family 2. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant, Kevin Weare, proposes to subdivide a 0.35-acre parcel into three lots. The property is currently vacant as a mobile home was recently removed/demolished from the site. Lot sizes proposed are: Lot A at 5,400 square feet, Lot B at 4,950 square feet and Lot C at 4,949 square feet. The proposal for eventual development of single family residences on the three new lots would arrive at a density of 8.57 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. Each lot would directly access NE 2"d Street via a separate driveway. The topography of the subject site is generally flat with minimal to no slopes. No critical areas were found at the subject site during the review of this application based on the City's Critical Areas' maps. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions N/A 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of new single family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies: shplipLBresko.doc City of Renton P1B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 4 Policy LU-34. Net development densities should fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposed project for three lots would arrive at a net density of 8.57 dwelling units per net acre which is within the allowable range for parcels smaller than one half acre which permits density up to 9.7 dwelling units per acre. Policy LU-35. A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single family residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project review. All three lots exceed the minimum lot size of which the smallest lot is 4,949 square feet but are smaller than abutting and adjacent lots which are greater than 7,500 square feet. Policy LU-40. New plats developed at higher densities within existing neighborhoods should be designed to incorporate street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes which address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. The rear yards of Lots A and B will directly abut the sideyard of an existing dwelling; therefore, attention to addressing privacy and the quality of life for the existing residents on the parcel to the immediate south should be taken into consideration. Policy H4. Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity. The proposal would create two additional lots, thereby increasing density within a currently developed residential area. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of three new single family dwelling units. The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way and private easements serving three lots or more from the gross acreage of the site. The property does not contain any sensitive areas nor areas required for right-of-way dedication. Based on three lots, net density would arrive at 8.57 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowed range. The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed a maximum of 50% lot coverage. The parcel is currently vacant, however, the single family residence, a mobile home, was recently removed/demolished from the site. A demolition permit was issued but expired. Inspections were not conducted and are required to be done. Staff recommends as a condition of the short plat that the necessary inspections for the demolition/removal of the building be completed prior to recording of the short plat. Setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 20 feet, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along a street is 15 feet and the rear yard is 20 feet. It appears that new Lot A, as depicted on the short plat, notes the side yard along a street (Union Ave. NE) as 10 feet, the requirement is 15 feet which must be complied with. New Lot A would meet the requirements for front, rear and interior side yard setbacks and provide adequate buildable area. New Lots 2 and 3 would meet setbacks and have adequate area to provide two off-street parking spaces as required by the parking regulations. The R-8 zone permits accessory structures only when associated with a primary structure located on the same parcel. No outbuildings are located on the site. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. Code requires the project is to dedicate an additional three (3) feet for right-of-way on NE 2nd Street for installation of a sidewalk. A 15 foot radius is required to be dedicated at the intersection of NE 2nd Street and Union Avenue NE. shplrpt_Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 5 The proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The three lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips per lot with credit given for the mobile home structure that was recently removed from the site. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $1435.50 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 2 lots = $1435.50) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The proposed plat would create three lots, which are proposed as: Lot 1 at 5,400 square feet, Lot 2 at 4,950 square feet and Lot 3 at 4,949 square feet. The proposed lot sizes are compatible, though slightly smaller, with other existing lots in this area under the same R-8 zoning classification. The proposed lots also comply with the R-8 requirements for minimum lot width (50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots). The minimum lot depth of 65 feet is achieved by all three lots and thus complies with the development standard. The lot configuration of the width and depth indicates that Lot A would have the front yard facing NE 2"d Street. All new lots appear to have adequate building area for the construction of single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. The size, orientation and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way, NE 2"d Street, which intersects with Union.Avenue NE. Each lot will have a separate driveway to NE 2"d Street. NE 2"d Street is a dead end street with an approved turnaround, constructed at the time of the Briar Patch Subdivision. Staff has received comments from property owners, those within the 300 foot notification area, concerning access from NE 2"d Street to the three lots. Residents are concerned with the potential increase in traffic on NE 2"d Street from three lots. Union Avenue NE is classified as an arterial street. Access to arterials is accomplished through a network of residential streets (NE 2"d Street). In order to ensure safe and efficient vehicular access to and from Union Avenue NE via NE 2nd Street, a limited amount of curb cuts onto Union Avenue NE helps ensure a safer travel pattern for vehicles travelling on, entering or exiting onto Union Avenue NE. Therefore, the short plat as designed, with the three lots accessing NE 2nd Street, addresses safe vehicular travel. Staff recommends as a condition that no direct vehicular access is to be allowed onto Union Avenue NE from any lot within the short plat and is to be noted on the face of the final short plat. Topography: The topography of the site is generally flat with minimal slopes. The property is vegetated with grass lawn and several trees. It appears that development of the lots would require removal of several trees in areas proposed for utilities, driveways and building pads. Potential erosion impacts may occur during project construction; therefore, staff recommends several conditions to reduce the impacts of erosion and sedimentation. The applicant will be required to provide a temporary erosion control plan system for the duration of the project. Installation of a silt fence along the down slope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed is required. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off -site and on -site improvements as well as building construction. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the contractor to the public works inspector. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8) on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. shplrpt Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 6 e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single family lot with credit given for the mobile home, is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $976.00 ($488 x 2 new units = $976.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Recreation: The proposal does not provide on -site recreation areas for future residents of the proposed short plat. However, there are existing recreational facilities in the area such as: Gene Coulon Memorial Park, Cedar River Park and Kiwanis Park that future residents would use. Therefore, in order to offset the additional use of these facilities, a Park Mitigation Fee would be required. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per new single family lot is recommended prior to the recording of the short plat. Credit would be given for the mobile home that was removed. The fee is estimated at $1061.52 ($530.76 x 2 new lots = $1061.52) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, it is anticipated that the proposed short plat would potentially result in one additional student (0.44 X 2 = 0.88) to the local schools (Maplewood Heights Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School). The Renton School District has indicated they can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal. Storm Water. A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. According to the drainage report, the project would be under the threshold for water quality and detention. The System Development Charge will be at the current rate of $525.00 per new single family residence. Current charges would be for two lots x $525.00 per lot = $1,050.00 and is payable with at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: There is an existing 12" watermain in Union Ave NE. There is also an 8" watermain in NE 2nd Street. Water service stub(s) are required to be provided to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. A system development charge of $1,105.00 per single family lot is required and payable at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. There is an existing 8" sewer main in NE 2nd Street. There is also an 8" sewer main in Union Ave NE. Existing septic systems must be abandoned in accordance with King County Health prior to recording of the short plat. This parcel is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District. All system development charges will be charged at the current rates as stipulated in the advisory notes. These fees are payable at the time of issuance of construction permits. H. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 9. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Bresko Short Plat, File No. LUA-02-132, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. shplrpt Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 7 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented, generally complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Single Family - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North Residential Single Family (zoned R-10); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). L Conclusion: The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 3. The proposed three lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed three lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by city code. J. DECISION: The Bresko Short Plat, File No. LUA-02-132, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall complete all necessary inspections and approvals for the demolition/removal of the single family residence/mobile home. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. No direct vehicular access shall be allowed onto Union Avenue NE from any lot within the short plat. This condition shall be placed on the face of the final short plat prior to recording. 4. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the down slope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off -site and on -site improvements as well as building construction. 6. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the contractor to the public works inspector. 7. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 8. The applicant shall pay the required Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $530.76 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence. The Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. shplrpt Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 8 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: "Is 2 w4wwlitavl Gregg A. Zimmerman, P/B/PW Administrator ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT decision date The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planninq 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 9.7 du/a maximum for lots'/2 acre or less. 3. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4,500 square feet, with minimum width of 50 feet. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. 4. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 5. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are a 20-foot front yard, a 20-foot rear yard, a 15-foot side yard along a street and 5-foot interior side as measured from the property line to the nearest point of the structure. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but must be removed prior to recording the final short plat. Lot A is a corner lot and must provide a 15 foot side yard setback along Union Ave. NE. 6. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 7. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Property Services 1. To be provided under separate cover. 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Plan Review — Surface Water 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $525 per single-family site. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Plan Review — Sewer 1. Short plats shall provide separate side sewers stubs to each building lot. No dual side sewers are allowed. 2. Existing septic systems shall be abandoned in accordance with King County Health prior to recording of the short plat. 3. This parcel is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). Fees are collected at the time the utility construction permit is issued. 4. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $760 per new building lot. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Plan Review — Water 1. Water service stub(s) will be required to be provided to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $1,105.00 per single-family site. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. 3. Existing hydrant shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. Plan Review — Street Improvements 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed, at a rate of 9.57 trips per single-family residence. A credit will be given for the previous mobile home that has been removed. 2. Dedication of an additional 3-feet of right of way on NE 2nd Street is required. The three (3) feet would allow for installation of sidewalks in the right-of-way. 3. Dedication of a 15 foot radius at the intersection of Union Avenue NE and NE 2"d Street is required. shplrpt Bresko.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 2, 2003; PROJECT LUA-02-132, SHPL-A Page 9 4. Street improvements including curb/gutter and sidewalks are required on the project side, on both Union Ave NE and NE 2nd Street. Plan Review — General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of January, 2003 to the owner. Blaze Bresko 2124 Third Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98121 TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of January, 2003 to the applicant/contact: Kevin H. Weare CDS Assoc. 3840 W. Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of January, 2003 to the parties of record: Robert and Julie Van Winkle 4108 NE 2nd Street Renton, WA 98059 Joe & Peggy Velasquez 4627 Kennedy Ave. SE Auburn. WA 98092 Connie Collings 177 Vashon Pl. NE Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of January, 2003 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official L. Rude, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning Jan Conklin Carrie Olson Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on January 16, 2003. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. shplrpt Bresko.doc 406.97 8" CP 406,67 II I I II II I I I I II II I I I I , I I I I II I I 30' I1 \Ion - 83 O G N N - CB T e 2-48_ 409. IE N/y 402. 0 12' CP 1PN 405.JQ 8" CP O 1 BTM 400.70 \ , N -O.od En° SIpn60•00• .L+ 1 12" Frost Z 4 �- 030'- m I o 6t.81' ma > a, ti I Lot A 5.399.5 Sr ,_ O _O m T 62.03' � e BRESKO INER SHORT PLAT a -xxx 1 Q.W. 1/4 N.W. go, 18, Tw7. 23K im Vicinity Map Uh' .-XXXX RENTON, WASKNOTON SG.WY. Not to Seat I/ NE 4th Street I / / NE 3rd C-L e2 Lot 2 Lot 3 / Briar Patch I / Phone Vol. 164 PP. 48-49 I I NE 2nd Street 1 Rl.ar� I /-Cable / TV Box Sit, Project T t NE let PI. MERIDIAN rre e IE S 404.67 8" CMP NAD 83-91 --k!ortheast 2nd Street 8 �•to N 88'16'25" W \ RI- 411,74 ✓Y $a.er MHASS e• root. m Lot 8 4,949.6 Sf 15HI oplle Nome _,... elm - I'_ I Q n B.ildin Sck Line Br (Typ) J -_etbo._ Weod Bick uilding 10 77.48' 36' M'PI• _ S Cona.le 28.5 fn I I Set R.bor g V Coo. LS 30581 60 00, 3 5.3253.00. ` N C. Wall w/ Wire Fence CB T . 2-4s" on�T-- o E $ 88i 8,25. Er-d R•Dor r a`9. 4 h C°o. LS t7683 (>'C 'IE N 02.24 12" CP S 12' CP 0.31' East II 1 S 8TM 399.ea 399.84 of, � I s Lot 70 , I iI Femwood Nolth Vol. 128 PP, 100i101 \ I 1 30' � - \ ( I t t N 89.02' ()' W Northeast tat Place 1 Mound MIC Conc / PIn. Dorn 0.7' I W 1/2, S 15 • I � f 1 '°. M.PI• I ppat C I s' •I 4,949.3 Sf 3I I � IC t." CT•ny I sC. -410\ 8- 403.01 w GRAPHIC SCALE -2o Q 10 20 8" CMP� 8" CMP E 1 t t 12" CMP (IN FEET) 1 i ch - 20 ft. GE 407.45 [ IE N 404.55 8" CMP BTM 40J15 5.1 a.bor ee C.P - - - LEGAL DESCRIPTION V Offset, LS 3058, renee Cane _ _ _ A.oTw a o.20' N - - THE EAST 170.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 90.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUAR TER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURVEY NOTES ' INSTRUMENT USED: SOKKIA SET 5 EOM METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE Y APPROXIMATE POINT ACCURACY: t0.05' �. Lot 59 3 SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS PER WAC n_ 332-130-090. �- - MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON WERE VISITED ON JULY 13, 2001. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE ON THE INDICATED DATE AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS THE GENERAL Fenee Corner EXISTING CONDITION AT THAT TIME. 1.12'E h4.Ja'N o NO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS OR RESERVATION OF • Cern•r °•n 170.00'. RECORD WHICH WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT .72' E dt 0.79' S \ ce ARE SHOWN, Project Notes 1 \ \ BASIS OF BEARINGS - Property Owner, 1 \ MONUMENTED LINE ALONG UNION AVENUE HE A. Blaze Bresko - -� \- BETWEEN HE 4TH STREET AND SOUTH 2ND PLACE 4315 SE 3rd Street 1 N 0'57'26' E AS PER PLAT Renton, Wa, 98059 Lot 80 BASIS OF VERTICAL CONTROL CITY OF RENTON BENCH MARK Total Area: 0.351 Ac. 1 RENT1503 401.01 FT. Current Zoning: R-8 Lot 68 New Parcel Areas Parcel A: 5,399.5 Sf Parcel B: 4.949.6 Sf ` Parcel B: 4.949.3 Sf Density Proposed: 6.5 Units per Acre 1 Density A lowed: 8 Unite per Acre 1 No Sensitm Areas Exist on the Project Site, l No Square Footage In Land for Streets. Notes The project site Is lees than 1/3 acre, and 1 has not been prwAouely Slatted, therefore the site falls under R-1area requirements. 1 PROJECT BENCH MARK - CITY OF RENTON CONTROL POINT J1503 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INT. NE 4TH ST AND UNION AVE. NE ELEV. 401.01 FEET DATUMS USED HORIZONTAL NAD 83-91 VERTICAL NAVD 88 CONTOUR INTERNALS - 2 FEET SURVEY IN THE: S.W. 1/4, N.W. 1/4 SEC. 15 TWP. 23N., RGE. 5E., W.M. L. TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITY SURVEY DRAWN BY: HUM Blaze Bresko CHECKED: SHEET 186 Union Avenue Northeast BLE 1 !e*�° Renton, WA PROJECT: OF I, 1.411e 01077 1 EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. - NM So. zooz PO BOX f3894 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. (425) 359-7198 DATE' 8/24/01 E6 - T23N R5E W 1/2 F4thj R j c. . . . . . . NE ard rl.- JL :R:-T8- R-8 R-10J(P) ................ co SE 132nd co co ro W) c- Pd -1 � z m R78 j,.,T-T T D -� � A \v H RC(P) (P) SE 1�15% SE 142nd St. o C-\\ G6 - 22 T23N ME W 1/2 ZONING ---- It..tu oity um"o %T%zty i9n!!4r tN F6 14800 P/B/M TECHNIC," SERVICES 03AS/02 15 T23N ME W 1/2 5315 AI N: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x-7235 For Agenda of: April 07, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution.... .... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with City of Renton code for new short plats. Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Hearing Examiner's Report Recommended Action: Council concur Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other. .. . Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a 15-foot corner radius at the intersection of SE 31" St and Kennewick Ave SE. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the Nason Short Plat, LUA-01-153, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. IAP1anReview\C0LS0N\Shortp1ats 2003WasonSHPL 03 AGNBILL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0088000630 Project File #: LUA-01-153 SHPL-H Street Intersection: SE 31' St./Kennewick Ave SE Reference Number(s) of Doacuments assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s):�(t-i;,CA - QrASGI Grantee(s): 1. c1 A, 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or fill legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) RIGHT —OF-WAY FOR SE 31 IT STREET AND KENNEWICK AVE SE WITHIN THE NASON SHORT PLAT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED UPON PAGE 3 OF 4 OF THIS DOCUMENT. PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The Grantor. for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Gra to s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS � ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Nota � eai® G e within box 950ti signed this instrument and A ° acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes v, s'`5510NF •. �-, 6.,< mentioned in the instrument. s01 ° :•off iAOTARY vn-. �o PUBLIC ' e Notary P bl in and Qt• the tate of Washington Notary (P ) Iti °� • �t" My appoin ent expires: Dated: � 1878-00 1 DeedotDedi Page I Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0088000630 Project File #: LUA-01-153 SHPL-H Street Intersection: SE 3]" St./Kennewick Ave SE Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): KASO%-_ Grantee(s): I QS [__-- 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIP ION: (Abbreviated or fill legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) RIGHT -OF-WAY FOR SE 31IT STREET AND KENNEWICK AVE SE WITHIN THE NASON SHORT PLAT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED UPON PAGE 3 OF 4 OF THIS DOCUMENT. PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The Grantor. for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantorr(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor G' City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOH1LEDQWk,�V%,, COUNTY OF KING ) �, o0kzN \\ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that�� �l Nolot'd( e '.t tiox e ` signed this instrument and OTA +A I acknowle ed it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ® N_ Ry m ; mentioned in the instrument. PUBLIC 11 r�•, � � r Not ry Public ij�,pdfor 2th tat \ Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: I - trot- b"�) 1878-001DeedotDedi Page 1 A Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0088000630 Project File #: LUA-01-153 SHPL-H Street Intersection: SE 3 1 " St./Kennewick Ave SE Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I • y2� �^i �,, 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) RIGHT —OF-WAY FOR SE 31 ST STREET AND KENNEWICK AVE SE WITHIN THE NASON SHORT PLAT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED UPON PAGE 3 OF 4 OF THIS DOCUMENT. PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) G `\�tt I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that co C� Notary S�14 �&Sf oop4fYbox �y s A, �) D►� signed this instrument and ��• �;SSON fkn q� o'� �� acknowledged it to b hi er/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes zz �� NOTARY = men2,ed in the instrument. P UBUG Pt1BlIG •. s Fa o . Notary Public in and o the State of Was ington /"/%'// O WASt\�G1�\\\ Notary (Print) �� d ✓�� + My appointment expires: �� t 310j Dated: U 1878-00IDeedotDedi Page I f5 *21*S *21AV X;DIAU[KKHX -.&WaQo QM� L— NOIN3U r n. C14 41� z 0 Li UUJ 0 U < 7' LON P. � �' FUG ............. 0 L L EXPIRES 11/30/* L'2t'. SOS 0-0 00 Qd .CZ .96 Ck.: oz Co H .0 C14 M I M< GO N04 ell 0 z 80 In L L r44M "ga, 0 At 00 LL001 uj 1P 'Co Luo Lj 00 T. 1z 0 < 1 70 z oor V) Baima & Holmberg Inc. ----] E N G I N E E R S & S U R V E Y 0 R S 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 (425) 392 — 0250 0250 DEED OF. DEDICATION Map Exhibit Project: Nason Short Plat Exhibit A WO# Legal Description PID GRANTOR: Street: THAT PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 8, AKERS FARMS NO. 6. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 5, BLOCK 8, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EXISTING NORTH MARGIN OF SE 31ST STREET; THENCE SOUTH 89016'33" WEST ALONG THE EXISTING NORTH MARGIN OF SE 31ST STREET A DISTANCE OF 23.96 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.20 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87033' 18" TO THE WEST MARGIN OF KENNEWICK AVENUE SE; THENCE SOUTH 01 043' 14" WEST ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 23.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL BEING SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 1878-001 DeedolDedi Page 3 4--L ioii01260 1IJ``4.S.E. 164TH S. 160 ��,toi�a /6 2xlo,5. IOE.00 T0� ��j' \o -2-- II 13-----I\ `�•r .; 7\� / y o �� og 6� 5` 4� 3� 2= I •2 W Li ry 56 0. I .. .. 4 5.3) a ,l,J..... 131.1 ,R R W �m 5 II 4 1 Y/ i32 3 �-- -o e_ 3O 3 12 �49� talc 6 1-J o X I S.E. 165TH S.T. = � (2) 3 1 uj >-- s eu G\so "so 4 w res -9 - - --' ' 1 yLq0 T WN ss� 1� sosoospRQ Esr9_ U\1- _-L ! Ns Z34o) 4 � �� )33.44 -- 7.41 , 4 I H B2 ,�--------5 --116 --10--r----- e T I z— I — ------ _-__---------- Q ILJ ti 3 x r313L , �S O•:. 6 �9 •° �'= l�����bT� � � 1l��-..-�1'---------6--- 9 / �� o (2� • l3) - - - - - - ---- (����// ➢ Il .H T.. 60 ��� 33a{6 I �,. S.s 29TH s ST. ;.E. 29TH sr. , � oo Z,o 1•-� � � •— �-- _ 150 -_ i' -o z,i. I; ® zo I N ip �U) f21 nP.804066 '' , ` p R / 60M 4 16602 .'Im IU,:; l I 2 i 7 ,-,(-) I st r. _2 Q _ 7: ` 2 � � 1 rQ • ^1 29 1fo tm r :- , (2) - - �I I ' -- 8 3 SP 276040 9 �� -� Q _ 398 1 1 1 145 --3___-- 254/i 'z 30/6 SITE _ /s t(Q 1 I ate,-_! 3aG.s1 I i case i r. - m x 1-+ tB) t�J 91 SP,185067 t165 IIrl VJ t6o 3 I I 1 1R�, -------19 6m x I SP 279037 - W d 81 ( 1 4 111 (2) Z . ie 5 _ 13 I o f� �1 .; —v ti - I , --- iR: x r.t j10 bc 1 1 I I -- Ono Tj 16L.I 60 I I I 60 6 ) I --� - �SP.585025 q7% ` SE 31 ST ST o S.E. - ! 6a tH 5 ll) 23-5 zu SI.7�1 n!N t n aim EAY �-{.�'ma 11 � NED w 0 11 Ioo 10.MAc.0.26Ac m, t1 i�R 1.48 At. t0D 1.73 Ac. � 0.62Ac � I 2 1�z4 7 2 $I r I==== s3oe _ ![!6 Nq 1 ! Nli f0 aq ^ In"/ / I.SS 0.67 Ar. w $ 26 Zz zs 2+ 19 y Is IT y' 5 1zn 300 loo tool--10-6-- V7 •)8 �� -mils a y 29 � � 5 26 s R'23 rs 21 ��'a Rub S rJ AMENO. I-. aw 4� ! >.a ee ee N 2 +a nee /. . x9x. S.E. 169TH s Pt 6 v g HER,ON:,';GLEN „I30s e n " . ;e1.5: vn M� I5o 1 150 • A fONO. 7 B 9 10 II R ; 6 4y of s 5 '-- g 913 yN s" 1f.0 T !!![ 300 46 y 1T5 j I I z °�„ A 6 33 4 S 2 1 O n» I 5.133AA1. 110 9 18 =_ F 6 �� II m ,4i0o g - 170TH " 4 s ST._Mh m — —p — — rnAcr A Na 18.24 AC. co zz 0.41ACJ v �o o S p a� !J� 17 a F= 4 28 ® ®Ij0 a r ® w �a £43s -� _/1 ••Z85 0.51 AC 436Ac H5 seta .. 36. 3S '� -0 wa H 84 Rle E 42 - A 2 17g221 �j 2 034 0.53AG a �aa8 a w.n4sot, v q l e4Donald'tlf37xa36 s39• 40 od 4214! ,7� R NRJk OAF February 7, 2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: David Nason 17618 SE 303`d Kent, WA 98042 Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-01-153,SHPL-H 3025 SE 3 1 " Street Subdivide an approximately 0.97-acre property into 7 lots intended for the development of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 22, 2002. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 29, 2002 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 9:01 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Proposed Plat Plan Exhibit No. 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit No. 4: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The proposal is to subdivide a .97- acre site into seven lots suitable for single-family residences. The subject site is designated Residential — 8 (R- 8) dwelling units per acre. It is also designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City's Comprehensive Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-01-153,SHPL-H February 7, 2002 Page 2 Plan. It abuts on the east and south side the City's boundaries that are shared with King County. SE 31" Street runs along the south side of the site and Kennewick Avenue SE is on the east side of the site. The site is presently undeveloped and is generally an overgrown pasture with a few sparse trees and slopes down slightly towards the south at a slope of approximately two percent (2%). No water features or sensitive areas have been found on the site. Environmental review was not required for this short plat, as it does not contain any sensitive areas The proposal is consistent with the Short Plat Criteria. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RSF) in that it would provide for future construction of single-family homes and would promote goals of infill development. The plat must also comply with the underlying zoning designation of R-8. The net density of the site is 7.69 dwelling units per acre which complies with the requirements of the zone. The proposal meets all lot width and depth requirements, size requirements and setback requirements. The proposed short plat complies with subdivision regulations including; lot arrangement, size, shape and lot lines are at right angles to street lines. Each lot would have access to a public road via either a private street easement or private driveway easement. The proposed lots seem to have sufficient building area for the development of suitable detached single-family homes. The plat is located at the northwest corner of the Kennewick Avenue SE and SE 3 1 " Street intersection. The plans appropriately indicate the dedication of a 15-foot corner radius. The proposal is to serve proposed lots 2 thru 6 via a private street easement of 26 feet in width with 20 feet of paving. Lots l and 7 would be served by a private driveway easement of 20 feet in width with 20 feet of paving. Street improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalk would be required along the site's SE 3 1 " Street and Kennewick Avenue SE frontages. Staff recommends the establishment of a Homeowner's Association or maintenance agreement for the private street, as well as any shared utility improvements. The subdivision is expected to generate additional traffic on the City street system; therefore, staff recommends that a traffic mitigation fee be imposed. The site is generally flat, with a downward slope towards the south along the site's SE 315' Street frontage. The property is undeveloped and the surrounding area includes older single-family residences designated with the same R-8 zone. The proposed lots are compatible with other existing and newly created lots in the area. No comments from the public in support or opposition have been received. Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development subject to the condition that the applicant provide code required improvements and fees. Staff also recommends a Parks Mitigation Fee. The Renton School District has indicated that it would be able to accommodate the increased student enrollment. Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-0l-153,SHPL-H February 7, 2002 Page 3 A drainage report has been submitted with the application. Stormwater generated from the site currently collects in a catch basin in the northwest corner of the SE 3 1 " Street and Kennewick Avenue SE intersection. There are no defined drainage features within the site. The proposal would collect stormwater runoff from the roadways and direct it to a combination detention and water quality vault to be located onsite within the private street easement. Water and sanitary sewer services would be provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The application is required to provide availability certificates prior to construction. Staff recommends approval of the Nason Short Plat subject to conditions including; the establishment of a Homeowner's Association or maintenance agreement, and payment of transportation, fire and parks mitigation fees. Schupe Holmberg, 100 Front Street South, Issaquah, WA 98027 stated that they are in agreement with the staff report. The site is one of the few sites available these days that is not encumbered by steep slopes, wetlands or streams. He has received the water and sewer availability letters and will get those to staff. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 stated that staff prefers the interior access to access off of Kennewick Avenue SE. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:21 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, David Nason, for the Nason Short Plat, filed a request for approval of a 7-lot short plat. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # 1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located at 3025 SE 3 0 Street. The site is located in the southeast quadrant of the City off of Benson Road SE. The site is located on the northwest corner of SE 31 ' Street and Kennewick Avenue SE. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1971 enacted in August 1962. The subject site is classified R-8 (Single Family Residential; 8 units/acre). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is vacant and contains some trees, shrubs and grass. Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-0 I - 153, SHPL-H February 7, 2002 Page 4 10. The subject site is approximately 0.97 acres or 42,341 square feet. The subject site is a rectangular parcel approximately 175.14 feet wide (east to west) by 247.77 feet deep. 11. The subject site has a very slight slope of approximately two to 10 percent towards the south and predominantly at the south edge of the lot. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into seven lots. The proposed lots range in size from approximately 5,265 square feet to 6,885 square feet. Lot sizes in the R-8 zone must be at least 4,500 square feet. 13. Proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 would be located along Kennewick Avenue SE. Proposed Lot 3 would be a corner lot with frontage along both Kennewick Avenue SE and SE 31" Street. Proposed Lots 4 and 5 would be located along SE 31" Street west of Proposed Lot 3. Proposed Lots 6 and 7 would be interior lots and they would be located in the northwest corner of the proposed plat. 14. The applicant proposes an access via a private street of 26 feet wide for Proposed Lots 2 through 6. This access would run between Proposed Lots 2 and 3. This would allow Proposed Lots 3, 4 and 5 to avoid access to SE 3 1 " Street. In addition, an easement would provide access to Proposed Lot 7 in the northwestern interior of the lot and to Proposed Lot 1. This shared easement would reduce the number of curb cuts along Kennewick Avenue SE. 15. The applicant would be responsible for street improvements along both Kennewick Avenue SE and SE 31" Street. 16. As proposed, the density will be approximately 7.69 dwelling units per acre. Code requires a density of between 5 and 8 dwelling units per acre. 17. Staff recommended that the fees usually assessed during environmental review be imposed on the subject site to reduce the impacts of this development on Fire, Transportation and Recreational services. The platting statutes allow a City to make sure plats provide for appropriate levels of urban services. 18. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 70 vehicle trips per day for the new homes. 19. The development will generate approximately two to three new students. They will be assigned to schools in the Renton School District on a space available basis. 20. Both water and sewer services to properties in this area are provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 21. Storm water will be handled by a system located in the private street. The applicant will have to meet the 1990 King County requirements. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The density of 7.69 dwelling units falls within the range permitted in the R-8 zone. The proposed plat provides reasonable lots, although interior lots surrounded by other lots do sometimes feel hemmed in. Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-01-153,SHPL-H February 7, 2002 Page 5 2. The easement road for access to Proposed Lots 1 and 7 will only serve two lots thereby limiting the impact on the adjacent neighboring property. The main access will be within the existing lot framework thereby reducing the impacts on the adjacent property. 3. The state platting law requires new plats to make adequate provision for roads, schools, parks and emergency services. The development of the site with seven homes will have an impact on City services. The applicant will, therefore, be responsible for paying appropriate fees for these services based on formulas already calculated by the City. 4. The proposed lots are rectangular lots as generally required by code. Access as noted appears reasonable. The development of the plat will provide additional housing choices in the modestly sized lot range. It also provides lots in an area that can be provided with urban utilities. The Proposed Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the short plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for shared roadway and utility improvements. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee equal to $75.00 for each new daily trip associated with the project for an estimated total of $5,024.25 (66.99 total trips x $75.00 = $5,024.25). The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single-family residence for an estimated total of $3,416.00 (7 new lots x $488.00 = $3,416.00). The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $530.76 for each new single family home for an estimated total of $3,715.32 (7 new lots x $530.76 = $3,715.32). The Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. The face of the plat shall prohibit direct access for any lot to Kennewick Avenue SE and/or SE 3 1 " Street. ORDERED THIS 71h day of February, 2002. t k FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS 7" day of February, 2002 to the parties of record: Nason Short Plat File No.: LUA-01-153,SHPL-H February 7, 2002 Page 6 Lesley Nishihira 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 David Nason 17618 SE 303`a Kent, WA 98042 TRANSMITTED THIS 71h day of February, 2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division South County Journal Shupe Holmberg 100 Front Street S. Issaquah, WA 98027 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 21, 2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 21, 2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I I pZ 1 ,mot 1 S 1 165TH S,T � T Q sessa�a 3 //�!,�/,F- 1 3TH w r. U ri nth/ I5.13 AC y IR M A' MIT or ARNMY MASON ON= PLa SHORT PLAT I /6e/o N6s B� WO Ill" art W NO(ON OTT W 1ORON r 01ep 6ZM�,O..-14MAW ,/M' OOIFD FN W A OORKIE PW MOrAONT q [pipL . pM I. a 1 4M AEI( iL N1010 a OTT Md�yRN�aN�UM Mon @OMMMt tgM a 30000 VIAL VATW ItiY 1AO.tr OMiMS WAf .Y aAlm TU•A� A000167Ww£-M��111-f7Y0K Q21a27. M TAX PARCEL: ODUOD-0e30 EXISTMO ZoNND no PROPOSM ZONING Re TOTAL STE AREA-4Zee6 04. R AREA OF ROACWAY-0 O-, R AREA OF OmIIGTON-121 A4. R PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 7 TOTAL PAINQ AREA- 42.6e4 84. R AREA BY LOTS LOT 1 AREA-. e.613 sp. R LOT 2 AREA- e,oe7 Nq• R LOT 3 AREA- LOT 4 AREA - LOT 6 =. 60 00. R fL WT 7 AREA- 6,ee6 sq. IL _�--r------------ arr W mmm cwWAL MM 0893 00�'"-�-�' I t/Y NXFFON FN 1M A aedRa POeT MaO.OIr 00-IIA' M -1* AM.T GY AT M OOM71NOIm Mt01l011a1 W >Z ip01 eT. • 1N AK INOMT-LO Nf.L31. GMNMN. 3M7rKl4 6.6i1k11e) 4@LV.. wPNMM,M7AM0.p, MA.,W I--LL.NM.Or va» 4 ' ax W mm" max UK AI.M 1 O to go SrA DMIO KMG ClAff *JPKV r OM OW MIMA T iRAN/D NNN is Oe��P SCAB 1' • M 1010 NOMTY tuecr INOwIAOfr W A ON=r W. N A 1NaAMDIT Gtt M M L43T VIW I%IM N R W I1.1N VL tt AT W M [AOT-11OT MATOR PPOeLL I2aR.�►-wAT. M ,Na1TOlY YA11011 NOMTMO 8O3e12 9AXIN. 3IM"M 6t142.0113 OK101S) Q ' NORIM 170.4.07. G21W UOM.76.740 6..NKW o'al) s Oraowc I nNOC - - - �- �- - --, - � NSQ'Ot'47^N 17 ! 6.14 (MEAS) PROPOSED R Of LOTS 7 MAX "WAKE DENSITY a OU/AOK PROPOM oEN/rr 7.1e DU/AC1K TOTAL AREA 0.e7 ACRE 42666 a R ROW AREA 121 n R. NET AREA 0.e7 ACRE 4LK4 OR. R DAVE MASON 1701e S.E. 30314 ICENT. WA OW42 SAWA HOLMDER0. INC- too FRONT STREET ISSAOUAM. WA "027 _e O.R ,U K e w 1XMTROL MONUMENT pew f 8i t� I ' VIC�iTY M" �400' Cl. �ii1 BE n' _ .r.l. r +fp•. Kr \l��► p � 1. red rmeum �€ p S.E. 31of ST. DL RM.44(L eExi Stn•t N i ,Ole 4 R . Ab ,. Ill" • M" rM4 110... AOOa0210 A M MT M1/W 1/OOIOD M vaiMt 4t W Mn. FAOL III, M maL/ 1aN0 tWIRi MPIeMM1ONw IONOVf MNAT ►ORMNI W sAs ton . A1/ 7 m M IAII1OIIr ROMM AT M fWMMOr 0-•Ot W we ,OT eN M010E GORY ,W TA UM We W SAD IOT.. A OWM W W ,4e Tan • TOwi,NpaN IARNMLL /0 M MD,/ar,K W .A/ 101e. .7. It. M A OLRMIK W tT01an ^• �e MT T *a w PAAAMLL r e OWN Yl W tYr IOT R 146 /af TO M MNIOIpOlIOM W M rANOLY YNIINI W er1-MC (0/a1 ,M I M6 AT A A4w W ,K Fw Na,1 m W M TAR TONE W MerMO-NA • MOIR IWMTOIY MOM wo MAM7/M.Y YAMON W taN..O p (tppl NIMRM�, too rm TO M IT 7. ona o As FOLa 11Af 1'OIR1Cw W Yi6 1bf 7. Oaal� IJ ►OLLOR T Tun�tlolR° ATrW,RrM`"`�`sW+N' i v iw LOT � �A1D owwm W us ran TOME NORM ►Mw& 10 M MDIOM.r IN[ W .A/ ICI. 0 me 1. A aRA,MR W /p 1af A M TOR FONT W SL100•r1ON MalO[ MO1RY PAAAIlLL A M YR W fAD IM 4 A GWM W W NS rW A A FONT W NtOUM MN 10SOON M WIRY MMNI W McDa1DART iRAT[ "Olmy N0. DO'.D1ta1 av, A10 AT A /e7AALOE Nafl1O<r rM/N M t0UMN7or OtlMBI s tA/ WT. W ,•s ran Ta1a ,Mlmaar MOM eD/ MAe1/ar NAII/1 a M mom uR W tlw ,OT 7t T101R WIRY AtO11. t10 IIOMTI ,IRW Y/ IOT 7 M E PONE TA MOtDOl1Ow AL A ,AR 11IOW0ID wp1NBM.r IMOM A PIN ' POelf W eC7.M -M0N / ►AR,W.L TO M MDT IeR W fA0 MTND =,, M.Y MONO SA- UR FIM✓mMN 10 M THE POMP AN6 � M t01NM a /aT 11080► LO len s M6. M .anc.m a M ax W 1tM10w w111L1Ae Nt/POID er I ®. ,R6aNOD tWD IOOIallo Ms1w IM1/i1D MO .ewt.l /i&W 10 EAMW 1 M/ Ai/ OWMe UMM 1/Ool-.a Wlh O JIUM" AIM 3470K now AA/ 3M7.w r MCI so % 0R 00)NTROL E. St..t SW MdlWENT pSe3 )L. C. CD 3745 37.61 (ti'CWO-S) •.W. V4 Of TWO ILL V4 MO. M T*K St! M. 11M It t.. WY iE�s�° R aea CITY 0' ItffiI�TON NA@= am= SLAT - 20 T23N ME W ' 14 - 32 T23N R5E W 1/2 Y QL'Qo 4" CH4 ZONING i:seoo pAWW WCMM SMVICM 29 T23N ME W 1/2 �N ��� CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Elizabeth Higgins (ext 6576) Subject: Contract for Consultant for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment /Re -zone Environmental Impact Statement Exhibits: Issue Paper Contract Recommended Action: Council concur Al a: For Agenda of: April 7, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept ... x...... Finance Dept..x.... Other. HR.............. Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... $557,800 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $557,800 Total Project Budget $557,800 City Share Total Project.. - None SUMMARY OF ACTION: This contract with the Mike Blumen/Blumen Consulting Group is for environmental review services for Scoping and Preliminary Draft EIS for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone. The cost of the consultant work will be paid in full by the Boeing Company and will be held in a revenue account while the work is completed. Council approval is required due to the amount of the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the Boeing Company will pay the full cost of the environmental analysis, approve the consultant contract for environmental review services for Scoping and a Preliminary Draft EIS for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone. F.7 Consultant Contract Boeing Scoping and DEIS CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: March 25, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Kfa Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Elizabeth Higgins (ext.6576) SUBJECT: Contract for Consultant for the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment /Re -zone Environmental Impact Statement ISSUE: Council approval is required for execution of the contract between the City and the Blumen Consulting Group for environmental review services for the scoping and draft environmental impact statement for the Boeing comprehensive plan amendment and re -zone application. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the consultant contract for $557,800 with work to proceed as outlined in the scope of work (attached). BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Policy and Procedure #250-02 requires Council approval of a contract of this size prior to execution of the document by the administration. The work identified in this contract is required to provide environmental analysis of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and re -zoning of the 288 acre Boeing Renton Plant. The City of Renton is the lead agency and the Environmental Review Committee, as the Responsible Official, has determined that the proposal is likely to have significant impacts on the environment. Preparation of an environmental impact statement is required. The analysis will include a review of four future March 25, 2003 Page 2 land use scenarios and corresponding zoning. Funding for this phase of environmental review, totaling $557,800.00 will be paid entirely by the Boeing Company. CONCLUSION: Execution of the consultant contract for environmental services is necessary to proceed with review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and re -zoning for the Boeing Renton Plant. The Boeing Company will pay for the entire cost of the study. Approval of the contract is recommended. Boeing Contract EIS Issue Paper CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the _ day of 2003, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY' and Blumen Consulting Group, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT", to provide services related to the next phase of the Boeing Renton Plant EIS-Scoping and the Preliminary Draft EIS. This contract will cover services through the submittal of the Preliminary Draft EIS to the City. All information contained within the report shall be made available for use by the City of Renton Staff and City Council. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant will provide all labor necessary to perform all work, which is described in the attached letter and Scope of Services (Exhibit A). This Agreement and Exhibit hereto contain the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior oral or written representation or understandings. This Agreement may only be amended by written agreement of the parties. The scope of work may be amended as provided herein. 2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Consultant Agreement, may order changes in the services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, and adjust the fee accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written agreement signed by the City and Consultant. If the project scope requires less time, a lower fee will be charged. If additional work is required, the consultant will not proceed without a written change order from the City. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to serve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. 3. Time of Performance. The Consultant shall complete performance of the Consultant Agreement for the items under Consultant's control in accordance with Exhibit A. If items not under the Consultant's control impact the time of performance, the Consultant will notify the City. 4. Term of Consultant Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the scope of work identified in Exhibit A, but no later than June 1, 2003. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Consultant. Consultant Agreement Sum. The total amount of this Agreement is not to exceed the sum of $557,800. Washington State Sales Tax is not required. The Cost Estimate provided by the Consultant to the City specifies total cost. 6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for services rendered will be made after a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Consultant for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Consultant modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 7. Record Maintenance and Work Product. The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. All originals and copies of work product, exclusive of Consultant's proprietary items protected by copyright such as computer programs, methodology, methods, materials, and forms, shall belong to the City, including records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced by Consultant while performing the services. Consultant will grant the City the right to use and copy Consultant copyright materials as an inseparable part of the work product provided. Review of Work. All memorandums, reports, draft and final versions and other written documents shall be submitted to the City for review prior to provision to Boeing Realty Company/Heartland. City shall authorize the release of any documents to Boeing/Heartland. Assignment Agreement. The Consultant shall not assign any portion of this consultant Agreement without express written consent of the City of Renton. However, use of the sub - consultants identified in Exhibit A is authorized by the City. 10. Hold Harmless. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death of Consultant's own employees, or damage to property caused by a negligent act or omission of the Consultant, except for those acts caused by or resulting from a negligent act or omission by the City and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. . It is specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain commercial liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 in full force throughout the duration of this Consultant Agreement. A certificate of insurance shall be delivered to the City before executing the work of this agreement. The certificate shall name the City as an additional insured. Please note: The cancellation language should read "Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will endeavef to mail 45 days written notic6to the certificate holder named to the left. 12. Independent Contractor. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. 13. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant and all of the Consultant's employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. This agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. C ANT CITY OF RENTON i ael J. Blu dent Jesse Tanner umen Consulting Group, Inc. Mayor 600 1081h Ave NE #1002 Bellevue, WA 98004 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the _ day of 2003, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Blumen Consulting Group, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT", to provide services related to the next phase of the Boeing Renton Plant EIS-Scoping and the Preliminary Draft EIS. This contract will cover services through the submittal of the Preliminary Draft EIS to the City. All information contained within the report shall be made available for use by the City of Renton Staff and City Council. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant will provide all labor necessary to perform all work, which is described in the attached letter and Scope of Services (Exhibit A). This Agreement and Exhibit hereto contain the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior oral or written representation or understandings. This Agreement may only be amended by written agreement of the parties. The scope of work may be amended as provided herein. 2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Consultant Agreement, may order changes in the services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, and adjust the fee accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written agreement signed by the City and Consultant. If the project scope requires less time, a lower fee will be charged. If additional work is required, the consultant will not proceed without a written change order from the City. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to serve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. 3. Time of Performance. The Consultant shall complete performance of the Consultant Agreement for the items under Consultant's control in accordance with Exhibit A. If items not under the Consultant's control impact the time of performance, the Consultant will notify the City. 4. Term of Consultant Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the scope of work identified in Exhibit A, but no later than June 1, 2003. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Consultant. 5. Consultant Agreement Sum. The total amount of this Agreement is not to exceed the sum of $557,800. Washington State Sales Tax is not required. The Cost Estimate provided by the Consultant to the City specifies total cost. 6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for services rendered will be made after a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Consultant for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Consultant modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 7. Record Maintenance and Work Product. The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. All originals and copies of work product, exclusive of Consultant's proprietary items protected by copyright such as computer programs, methodology, methods, materials, and forms, shall belong to the City, including records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced by Consultant while performing the services. Consultant will grant the City the right to use and copy Consultant copyright materials as an inseparable part of the work product provided. 8. Review of Work. All memorandums, reports, draft and final versions and other written documents shall be submitted to the City for review prior to provision to Boeing Realty Company/Heartland. City shall authorize the release of any documents to Boeing/Heartland. 9. Assignment Agreement. The Consultant shall not assign any portion of this consultant Agreement without express written consent of the City of Renton. However, use of the sub - consultants identified in Exhibit A is authorized by the City. 10. Hold Harmless. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death of Consultant's own employees, or damage to property caused by a negligent act or omission of the Consultant, except for those acts caused by or resulting from a negligent act or omission by the City and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. . It is specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain commercial liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 in full force throughout the duration of this Consultant Agreement. A certificate of insurance shall be delivered to the City before executing the work of this agreement. The certificate shall name the City as an additional insured. Please note: The cancellation language should read "Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will eRdeaver to mail 45 days written notice'to the certificate holder named to the left. liability of aRy kind upon the GempaRy, its agents or FepFeSeRtatives-2- 12. Independent Contractor. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. 13. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant and all of the Consultant's employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. This agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. 4C%aelJ. NT iu dent umen Consulting Group, Inc. 600 108t' Ave NE #1002 Bellevue, WA 98004 CITY OF RENTON Jesse Tanner Mayor EXHIBIT A March 6, 2002 Mr. Alex Pietsch, Interim Administrator City of Renton Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 I CImmBONSU�LiIN� GROUP, INC 425-462-6401 FAX 425-462-640' www.blumencg.con 600 108th Ave. NE Suite 100: Bellevue, WA 9800, SUBJECT: Scope of Work and Budget Agreement for Phase 2- Scoping and the Preliminary Draft EIS — Boeing Plant EIS Dear Alex: Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. is pleased to submit this Scope of Work and Budget Agreement to the City of Renton to provide services related to the next phase of the Boeing Renton Plant EIS- Scoping and the Preliminary Draft EIS. We and our team welcome the opportunity to continue to assist the City of Renton with the SEPA process on this exciting project. Our current Interim Scope of Work and Budget Agreement covers services through the final definition of the EIS alternatives and up to the start of the public scoping process. We have now reached resolution on the alternatives, and the start of the scoping process is scheduled for next week. Therefore, we have formulated a Scope of Work and Budget to cover services over the next approximately two plus months (through submittal of the Preliminary Draft EIS to the City, scheduled for the end of May). In the event that this timeline is extended for reasons beyond our control, or if the overall approach to the EIS is modified by the City, our Scope of Work may need to be amended to reflect additional services or the change in approach. The following Scope of Work identifies a list of tasks associated with completing the scoping process and the Preliminary Draft EIS, and the accompanying deliverables to the City by the Blumen Consulting Group team. As you know, we propose to continue to use the services of the following technical firms during this and subsequent EIS phases: Transportation Engineering Northwest (transportation), AC Kindig & Company (water quality, shoreline and fisheries), KPFF (infrastructure, stormwater drainage and utilities), Associated Earth Sciences (soils/groundwater and hazardous waste issues) and BRC Acoustics (noise). SCOPE OF WORK As indicated above, our Scope of Work assumes that the Blumen Consulting Group team will continue to assist the City of Renton in the completion of various steps related SEPANNEPA Compliance Land Use Entitlemeni Project Coordinatior, to the EIS process over the next several months; this next phase of work will include services related to the public scoping process and preparation of the Preliminary Draft EIS. Although two distinct sub -phases are described below, overlap in work between the two phases will occur. This is required to expedite completion of the Preliminary Draft EIS according to the schedule. The Preliminary Draft EIS and scoping effort will continue to include regular meetings with the City of Renton and BRC/Heartland, as well as meetings among the consultant team, and regular communication via telephone and e-mail. The following specific tasks will be completed in this phase. Scopinq- The required 21-day scoping period will allow for public and agency comments on the proposed scope of the EIS. A public meeting to obtain oral comments is not required, but a meeting is assumed in this scope of work. Further, a separate meeting with city staff from various departments is assumed to be necessary as well, as part of the scoping process. During scoping, the following specific tasks will be completed: Task 1: Revise the draft Scoping Outline, previously submitted to the City in the initiation phase of work, for eventual use in the public process; this outline contains a brief description of the Proposed Action and the alternatives to be addressed in the EIS, and the elements to be evaluated in the EIS, with brief identification- of the specific issues under each element. Revise the Outline based on applicable comments from the City and Boeing/Heartland. This Outline can be distributed to the public and /or agencies as part of the formal process. Task 2: Coordinate with the City and Boeing/Heartland regarding specific scoping strategies and methods. Coordinate with the City regarding methodologies for specific EIS elements, and finalize the scope, as warranted. Review draft materials that would be used to distribute to the public and other interested parties during scoping for consistency. Assumes attendance at up to two (2) additional meetings on this subject (not including the public and city staff meetings, and meetings with agencies described below). Task 3: Participate in one public scoping meeting — it is assumed that the City would coordinate with Boeing/Heartland to prepare handouts and/or display boards for the public scoping meeting. It is further assumed that the City will take the lead on running the meeting; we will assist the City in the description of the EIS process and purpose, as necessary. It is assumed that attendance by the technical EIS consultants will not be necessary at the public meeting. • Task 4: Participate in up to two City of Renton department staff meetings regarding the scope of the EIS- it is assumed that similar handouts/display boards can be used at this meeting, and that the City will take the lead on running the meeting. Relevant members of the EIS team will participate and respond to questions, as required. • Task 5: Participate in up to two meetings with other agency staff- most likely the Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DEIS Services 2 Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. State Department of Transportation and Department of Ecology, to discuss the purpose and scope of the EIS. Appropriate EIS team members will attend. Task 6: Attend one Planning Commission briefing, one community leaders briefing and one Planning and Community Development committee briefing during the scoping process- again, it is assumed that the City will take the lead on the presentations to these bodies. • Task 7: Review all written comment letters (and verbal comments) received during scoping, distribute letters to the technical team as warranted, and coordinate with the City to finalize the EIS scope to reflect comments, if changes to the draft scope are warranted. During the preparation of the Preliminary Draft EIS, the following specific tasks will be completed: Task 1: Continue to coordinate with the City, Boeing/Heartland and the project team to define and obtain all relevant information for the EIS. This includes monitoring the status and progress of responses to our Information Needs Matrix previously distributed to the team, and provision of comments to finalize such information. In addition, necessary information for the EIS analyses will include draft proposed map and code amendments that will be considered in the EIS. • Task 2: Coordinate with the City regarding the necessary Comprehensive Plan and code text amendments, to insure consistency between the EIS and the concurrent amendment process. Task 3: Following the receipt of all relevant information on the EIS alternatives, an outline of the key features of each alternative and EIS technical report format requirements will be prepared for distribution to the EIS team. This outline will provide the framework for all subsequent environmental analysis and will ensure consistency of technical reports. For purposes of this scope and budget, we have assumed the EIS will address four (4) alternatives. They include: 1) the No -Action alternative, which will assume ongoing Boeing operations and some level of new development that would be allowed under the existing industrial zoning; 2) a Partial Redevelopment alternative which will assume ongoing Boeing operations and redevelopment under mixed -use zoning; 3) a Redevelopment alternative that assumes redevelopment under mixed -use zoning at a low- to mid -rise scale; and 4) a Redevelopment alternative that also assumes redevelopment under mixed -use zoning, but at a mid- to high-rise scale (this alternative will serve as the high end of the range of redevelopment intensity for environmental review purposes). No additional alternatives are assumed to be necessary for the EIS. If additional alternatives need to be addressed or major changes to the alternatives are made during the PDEIS preparation, an adjustment in our scope and budget may be warranted. Task 4: Coordinate with Heartland and other team members to identify EIS graphic needs. It is assumed that Heartland will produce certain graphics required for the EIS (i.e., representing the alternatives, prototype sketches, and graphics to support Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DENS Services Boeing Renton. Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. the visual analysis). Other graphics will be prepared directly by the EIS team. For purposes of this scope and budget, we assume up to 30 graphics will need to be prepared on a draft basis by the EIS team. Final production of graphics will be accomplished by Heartland. • Task 5: Prepare the Alternatives Description Chapter of the EIS, based on the information obtained from the City and Boeing/Heartland, including the description of the "Proponent's Objectives". Coordinate with the City and Boeing regarding the definition of the objectives. • Task 6: Conduct research and analysis of all environmental elements to be included in the EIS. The assumed scope of the EIS is reflected in the draft Scoping Outline (attached to this Letter as Attachment A). If any changes/additions to the assumed scope are required as a result of the scoping process, or through further direction from the City, as adjustment in our scope and budget may be warranted. Task 7: Assist in coordinating the efforts of the full EIS technical team, including monitoring of progress, assisting in resolving technical issues that arise, reviewing all draft technical reports, providing comments and incorporating the final technical reports into the PDEIS. Again, if any additional technical reports are required for the EIS (beyond the ones identified in the draft Scoping Outline), an adjustment in our scope and budget may be warranted. Task 8: Attend up to 30 additional meetings through submittal of the Preliminary Draft EIS to the City (this assumes approximately 2 to 3 meetings per week during this phase of the EIS). It assumes meetings are attended by up to four EIS team personnel (3hr. meetings assumed). This includes meetings with the City and/or Boeing/Heartland, meetings with other agencies, Planning Commission briefings, and/or meetings among the EIS team. Included within this task is one assumed meeting per week with City staff (to be attended by representatives from TenW) to specifically discuss transportation issues, progress, results, etc. • Task 9: Attend up to two additional briefings of the Planning Commission and/or City Council committees during the PDEIS process. It is assumed if presentations are required, City staff will take the lead and our involvement will be minor in nature. • Task 10: Prepare the Preliminary Draft EIS for internal review by BCG, including the Fact Sheet, Alternatives Chapter and the Environmental Impacts/Mitigation Chapter of the document. (It is proposed that the Summary Chapter not be produced until after City review of the PDEIS, in case substantive changes to sections of the document are required.) • Task 11: Coordinate production of the document and print copies for review by the City, Boeing/Heartland and the team (it is assumed that two volumes will be required due to the likely size of the document). It is assumed that up to twenty (20) copies of the PDEIS will be required, at a cost of $70 per copy (assumes two volumes). • Task 12: EIS project management: including, coordination with the City, Boeing/Heartland and the team, via telephone and e-mail, regarding overall EIS Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DENS Services 4 Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. strategies, progress, issues and solutions, and schedule. Also included in this task are subcontract management, accounting, and invoicing, related to management of the EIS team. This task assumes one weekly conference call with city staff through this phase. At the end of this phase, the first Preliminary Draft EIS will be produced for review by the City and Boeing. This scope and budget cover our services through submittal of the first draft of the PDEIS to the City of Renton (targeted in the project schedule for May 29, 2003). A scope of work and budget for the next phase of the process, Phase 3- Completion and Issuance of the Draft EIS, will be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City upon receipt of comments on the PDEIS. Deliverables The following deliverables will be produced by the Blumen Consulting Group team during this phase of work: Revised version of the EIS Scoping Outline. This document will include a brief description of the scoping process, Proposed Action, alternatives, and elements of the environment proposed for analysis. Preparation of the Preliminary Draft EIS for submittal to the City and Boeing/Heartland for review. • An overall Scope of Work and Budget for the conclusion of the Draft EIS phase of the EIS process. (The final scope and budget for the completion and issuance of the Draft EIS, Phase 3, will be determined upon receipt of comments on the PDEIS.) SCHEDULE The Blumen Consulting Group (BCG) team is prepared to complete work on the Preliminary Draft EIS according to the agreed -upon schedule. Based on that schedule, the public scoping process will be initiated by March 101h and conclude by March 31" The Preliminary Draft EIS will be completed and submitted to the City by May 291h, assuming all other milestones are met (including receipt of all final baseline and alternatives information by March 21s). If the schedule is delayed for reasons beyond our control, an adjustment in scope and budget may be warranted. BUDGET As agreed -to in our current Agreement, we will establish budgets for the EIS effort on a phased basis, under not -to -exceed amounts. For Phase 2 of the EIS process- Scoping and the Preliminary Draft EIS, we propose to establish a not -to -exceed amount of 557 800. A breakdown of estimated costs among the various firms is provided as Attachment B to this letter. This budget includes all team labor and reimbursable expenses, and is consistent with the assumed EIS scope identified in the draft Scoping Outline, Attachment A to this Letter. It covers services through submittal of the Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DE15 Services Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. Preliminary Draft EIS to the City (targeted for May 29, 2003). This budget is in addition to the $42,000 previously authorized. Our team's costs will be billed on an hourly basis, consistent with our current Fee Schedules, attached to this letter (Attachment C). At the conclusion of this phase of work and receipt of comments on the PDEIS, we will be able to define a scope of work and not -to -exceed budget for Phase 3, completion of the Draft EIS. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to be part of the City's team on the Boeing Renton Plant EIS. We look forward to successfully completing the Draft and Final EIS. If this proposed Scope of Work and Budget Agreement are acceptable to the City of Renton, we assume that you will incorporate this letter in an addendum to our current Contract, or as a new Contract. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, 8 &NSULTING GROUP, INC. ichael - President Attachments Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DENS Services Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. R Attachment A Draft Scoping Outline (to be included when revised) Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DEIS Services Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. ATTACHMENT A DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE & REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF BOEING RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT EIS INTRODUCTION The Boeing Company is proposing to amend the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan map designation on approximately 280 acres of its property located adjacent to Lake Washington, to Employment Area -Transition (EA-T) and/or Center Office Residential (COR). The City of Renton, has determined that this proposal is likely to have significant impacts on the environment and is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) as required by the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C). This scoping document provides a description of the Proposed Action(s), EIS Alternatives, and those elements of the environment preliminarily identified for consideration and analysis in the EIS. Scoping: Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts and licenses or other approvals that may be required. _ All comments must be received by 5 P.M., Monday, March 31", 2003 for consideration in the proposed scope of the EIS. Written comments should be addressed to: Elizabeth Higgins Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 6"' Floor Renton, WA 98055 Comments may also be sent to eiscomments@ci.renton.wa.us A public scoping meeting is scheduled for 6 pm, Tuesday, March 25th, at Renton High School Commons, 400 S. Second St., Renton, WA 98055. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 61h Floor Renton, WA 98055 Proponent: The Boeing Company Lead Agency: City of Renton Preliminary Scoping Document Page 1 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 BOEING RENTON- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT INTRODUCTION The Boeing Company is currently evaluating consolidation options for its commercial airplane operations on the west portion of the Renton Plant site. The consolidation process is part of a company wide effort to achieve cost and production related efficiencies for its commercial airplane operations in Renton, Washington. Consolidation of Boeing operations may create opportunities for Boeing to reoccupy or surplus its non- essential properties and buildings. Boeing and the City of Renton are interested in studying potential redevelopment opportunities for certain Renton Plant properties that may be made available for sale or redevelopment in the future. The City is also interested in studying potential redevelopment opportunities for several properties adjacent to the Renton Plant properties. LOCATION OF THE PROPOSAL The site subject to the proposal includes approximately 280 acres of Boeing property and approximately 15 acres of contiguous property. The site lies within the City's Urban Center designation, and is located adjacent to the south shore of Lake Washington between the Renton Municipal Airport and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park landmarks. Figure 1 is a vicinity map. The site is bounded by Lake Washington and the Southport mixed use development on the north; Renton Memorial High School Stadium and N 51h and 6`h Streets on the south; the Cedar River -waterway and trail on the west; and Garden Avenue N on the east. The site includes the existing Boeing Renton Plant properties located west of Logan Avenue N and between Logan Avenue N and Park Avenue N; additional Boeing and privately owned properties located between Park Avenue N and Garden Avenue N; and the existing Puget Sound Energy (PSE) substation property located north of the intersection of Logan Avenue N and Park Avenue N. Figure 2 is a site map showing Boeing, PSE and other ownership boundaries. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL As described above, Boeing and the City of Renton are interested in studying potential redevelopment opportunities for certain properties that may be made available for sale or redevelopment in the future. Consideration of a broader range of land uses than is currently allowed by existing comprehensive plan and zoning designations is proposed for these properties (refer to Figure 2). In order to achieve this potential for a broader range of uses, changes in regulatory controls will be required. This EIS will evaluate alternative redevelopment scenarios that encompass a full range of land use intensities and densities that the site could potentially accommodate in the future. A description of the alternatives identified for evaluation in the EIS follows the description of the Proposed Action(s) below. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 2 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 The Proposed Action(s) for the site include: • Comprehensive Plan map re -designation to Employment Area Transition (EA-T) or Center Office Residential (COR) for the portion of the Boeing properties east of Logan Avenue, and potentially for other properties; • Comprehensive Plan map re -designation to Center Office Residential (COR) for the portion of the Boeing properties west of Logan Avenue; • Comprehensive Plan text amendments to existing EA-T and COR policies; • Creation of new COR zoning designation(s) for the site; • Rezones to the newly created COR zone(s); • Other applicable modifications to City of Renton Development Regulations; and • A Development Agreement between the City of Renton and Boeing. The results of the SEPA environmental review are intended to provide decision makers with relevant information needed to consider adoption of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning code and other applicable development regulations. The specific text of Comprehensive Plan amendments to EA-T and COR policies, new zoning provisions, and modifications to development regulations will be analyzed during the EIS process. Specific text amendments to certain policies will be proposed to achieve Boeing's goals related to a broader range of uses and the City's goals of implementing the existing Urban Center designation. In general, proposed revisions to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan policies include a range of possible changes corresponding to the proposed alternatives. Potential changes requested by the applicant for the EA-T designation include adding industrial, research and development, and big box retail uses as allowed employment - based uses implementing Alternative 2. Policy changes needed to implement Alternatives 3 and 4 could delete industrial uses and big box retail from the EA-T and COR designations and revise policies to reflect the existing Urban Center designation. Policies guiding the location of retail and service uses within the study area will also be considered. Proposed revisions to COR policies would include defining commercial/retail and research and development/lab uses as primary uses in this designation. Increases to the maximum allowed residential densities and height limits, currently identified for COR, would be proposed. Proposed policy language would call for circulation within developments that is compatible with a pedestrian orientation. Vehicular access to each development(s) would not be limited from streets defined only as "major streets" (as is currently stated in the Comprehensive Plan); access would be allowed from internal collectors or minor streets. Other specific policy changes may be proposed for analysis as part of the EIS process. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 3 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan are anticipated to reflect public and private investment in infrastructure, including the arterial street network. New COR zoning designation(s) would also be created. The proposed zoning designations, which may provide for phased application over time, would allow flexible use combinations which encourage redevelopment to a broader range of uses than is currently allowed under the existing zoning. Specific provisions would be proposed for development standards such as lot coverage, density, height, landscaping, street widths, and parking. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES TO BE EVALUATED IN THE EIS The EIS will address the probable significant impacts of the Proposed Action(s) and the No -Action Alternative. At this stage of the process, there is no preferred plan for potential sale or redevelopment of the Boeing properties, given ongoing Boeing operations and uncertainty related to specific surplus decisions that may be made in the future. In addition, subsequent to any decisions by Boeing to surplus properties and/or buildings for sale or redevelopment, it is likely that multiple purchasers would seek to reuse or redevelop portions of the site independently over time. Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations would allow a range and mix of lower density and higher density redevelopment options. For purposes of environmental review, four redevelopment scenarios have been proposed that represent a full range of land use intensities and densities that the site could accommodate, given existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations. The scenarios represent an overall envelope of potential redevelopment for analysis in the EIS; none should be considered a possible definitive plan for the Boeing properties or other contiguous property. They function to provide representative levels and types of redevelopment that could be achieved over time and that can be evaluated in the context of the EIS process. As part of the decision making process, relative to land use planning and zoning provisions, the City may choose to select different land uses within the range of alternative redevelopment scenarios. Future redevelopment of the site is assumed to occur by the year 2030. Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 are shown on Figures 3 through 6. Following is a summary description of the proposed alternatives. Alternative 1 — No -Action (Existing Zoning) Under the No -Action Alternative, existing City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations would govern future redevelopment of the site. Current land use designations that apply to the site include Employment Area -Industrial (EA -I), Employment Area -Transition (EA-T) and Employment Area -Office (EA-0). Current zoning on the site is Heavy Industrial (IH) and Commercial Office (CO), Figure 3 depicts Preliminary Scoping Document Page 4 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 redevelopment under the No Action Alternative, which assumes the lowest intensity land use of the four alternatives. The No Action Alternative assumes that consolidation of Boeing Renton Plant operations has occurred on the portion of the site west of Logan Avenue N. The consolidation process (termed "Move to the Lake") is currently in the implementation phase and is expected to be completed by 2004. (Note: Consolidation of Boeing Plant operations is considered a separate action under SEPA, and is not part of the proposal being evaluated in this EIS.) The No Action Alternative assumes a reasonable redevelopment scenario under existing zoning by the year 2015. Under the No Action Alternative, certain areas of the site not in use for Boeing operations, or subject to the continuation of existing uses, are assumed to be built out in bulk retail and light industrial uses allowed under the existing IH zoning. The No -Action Alternative would result in approximately 260,000 square feet of new bulk retail uses and 1.1 million square feet of new light industrial land use. Existing office and/or lab uses at the south end of the site are retained under all the redevelopment scenarios, including No Action. Alternatives 2, 3 and 4, which represent increasingly higher levels of redevelopment, will be comparatively evaluated in the EIS against the No Action Alternative as defined. Note: For purposes of analyzing potential redevelopment impacts under the No Action Alternative only, a baseline condition reflecting onsite conditions following consolidation of Boeing operations to property west of Logan Avenue N is assumed. Consistent with that process, certain Renton Plant buildings east of Logan Avenue N are assumed to be vacated and mothballed; however, demolition of these buildings, as preparation for future redevelopment, is not yet assumed. The existing condition also assumes no change to the adjacent PSE property and continuation of existing office and lab uses at the south end of the site. Alternative 2 — Partial Redevelopment Alternative 2 is a partial redevelopment scenario. Under Alternative 2, the site would be redesignated EA-T and/or COR in the Comprehensive Plan and new COR zoning would be applied. Policy amendments could be made to the COR designations to allow industrial, retail and big box uses and clarify the type and mix of commercial/service uses. Policy amendments would be made to the EA-T designation to eliminate the interim status of the designation, clarify the allowed commercial and residential uses, narrow the range of the allowed underlying zoning and provide for appropriate phasing As in the No Action Alternative, Alternative 2 assumes consolidation of Boeing operations and continuation of existing office and lab uses at the south end of the site as part of the baseline condition. Partial redevelopment to higher intensity land uses is called for on the remainder of the site east of Logan Avenue N. Figure 4 depicts the assumed types of uses and spatial allocation of these uses across the site. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 5 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Land uses evaluated for these areas include bulk retail or strip commercial uses (260,000 square feet) in Subarea A (refer to Figure 4), and new office/retail uses (820,000 square feet) in Subareas B and C. It is assumed that the partial redevelopment could occur by the year 2015 and that transportation and utility infrastructure improvements would be required to support the higher intensity uses. Alternative 3 — Full Redevelopment, (Low to Mid -Rise) Alternative 3 is a redevelopment scenario reflecting full redevelopment of the site at a low to mid -rise level by the year 2030. Under Alternative 3 the site would be re- designated EA-T and/or COR in the Comprehensive Plan and new COR zoning would be applied. (The terms low-rise and mid -rise reflect assumed building heights of 1 to 3 stories and 4 to 6 stories, respectively.) Figure 5 depicts assumed land uses under Alternative 3. No assumption of continued Boeing operations at the Renton Plant is made by the year 2030, however existing office uses (660,000 square feet) at the south end of the site would continue. Land uses evaluated under Alternative 3 include approximately 10.7 million square feet of new mixed -use retail, office, and residential land uses. Transportation and utility infrastructure improvements would be required to support the higher intensity uses under this scenario. Alternative 4 — Full Redevelopment, (Mid to High -Rise) Alternative 4 reflects the highest level and intensity of redevelopment at a mid to high- rise level by the year 2030. Under Alternative 4 the site would be re -designated EA-T and/or COR in the Comprehensive Plan. New COR zoning would reflect higher intensity development standards than considered in Alternative 3. The terms mid -rise and high- rise reflect assumed building heights of 4 to 6 stores and above 6 stories, respectively. Similar to Alternative 3, there is no assumption of continued Boeing operations by the year 2030 and existing office use at the south end of the site would continue. Figure 6 depicts assumed land uses under this Alternative. Types and locations of development are similar to those described for Alternative 3, however higher densities are assumed. Land uses evaluated under Alternative 4 include approximately 17 million square feet of new mixed -use retail, office, and residential land uses. As for Alternatives 2 and 3, transportation and utility infrastructure improvements would be required to support the higher intensity uses. LICENSES, PERMITS AND NECESSARY APPROVALS The following permits and approvals may be required for phased redevelopment of the site: City of Renton: Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments Zoning Code Text Amendments Property Rezones Preliminary Scoping Document Page 6 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Other modifications to applicable Development Regulations Development Agreement Approval All other licenses and permits required to accomplish future redevelopment of the site. EIS APPROACH The EIS is intended to address the probable significant impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments, zoning redesignation(s) and other text amendments and modifications, as well as impacts from potential future sale or redevelopment activities on the site by the year 2030. A sufficient range of redevelopment scenarios and accompanying level of detail and analysis will be identified and conducted to support potential adoption of a Development Agreement and the proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning actions. Future redevelopment proposals may be required to undergo additional SEPA review (at the time specific applications for redevelopment are submitted to the City for review and approval), depending on the relationship of such proposals to the assumptions evaluated in this EIS. Environmental review under SEPA has been accomplished for prior actions on the Boeing Renton Plant site, as well as for other actions in the immediate area. This EIS will use relevant information from these prior review efforts, as warranted (per WAC 197-11-600). Documents that may be incorporated by reference for this EIS include: • Boeing Plant Production Expansion, 1989-1990, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (City of Renton 1990) • Boeing Plant Production Expansion, 1989-1990, Final Environmental Impact Statement (City of Renton 1989) • Boeing Plant Production Expansion, 1989-1990 Mitigation Document (City of Renton, 1990) • Southport Development Planned Action Draft and Final Supplemental EIS and Technical Appendices (City of Renton 1999) • Southport Planned Action Mitigation Document (City of Renton, September 17, 1999) • City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statement, 1993 • City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Supplemental Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statement, December 1994, February 1995. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 7 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT The lead agency has preliminarily identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS. Probable significant impacts associated with the redevelopment/construction, operation and cumulative impacts for the four land use scenarios will be evaluated for each element of the environment discussed below. Appropriate mitigation measures will be identified. Natural Environment Earth The regional geologic setting and local geologic and soil conditions for the site will be characterized based on available data and maps. A discussion of applicable geologic hazards will address the sites potential as a seismic hazard area. Seismic hazards to be evaluated will include liquefaction potential, lateral spreading potential, and review of potential impacts from a subduction zone earthquake. The analysis will incorporate the latest fault line projections for the area. Slope stability and landslide issues will be discussed for each alternative, as relevant. Any erosion and sedimentation hazards will also be discussed. Anticipated building construction methods associated with potential redevelopment scenarios for the site will be described. Geotechnical issues will be comprehensively evaluated and discussed, including the following: any limitations of site soils for grading and structural support; potential impacts of mass grading, including reuse of existing fill; and potential construction -related impacts associated with reuse and placement of pile foundations. Relevant mitigation options for potential geotechnical impacts will be identified and discussed. Environmental Health Hazardous Materials The Boeing Company is currently working with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) to implement remedial actions associated with past releases of hazardous substances at the Boeing Renton Plant. These actions are being addressed through the implementation of an Agreed Order negotiated under the State of Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). At the Boeing Renton Plant, a Remedial Investigation (RI) has been completed and approved by Ecology. A Feasibility Study (FS) is in the development stage. When a final determination of the specific remedial actions to be implemented is made by Ecology, a Cleanup Action Plan (CAP) will be prepared under MTCA. Certain information developed as part of the remedial investigation process is available as part of the public record, on file at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office in Bellevue, WA. It should be noted that the remediation process under MTCA is considered a separate action from the Proposed Actions to be addressed in this EIS. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 8 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 This EIS will describe the ongoing remediation process on the Renton Plant site as part of the MTCA process. It is assumed that at the time sale or redevelopment of the site occurs in the future, the CAP will have been implemented in conjunction with Ecology, and remediation of hazardous materials will have been initiated and/or accomplished. Based on publicly available materials, the EIS will summarize: existing onsite conditions associated with hazardous substances, known soil and groundwater contaminant areas and sources, and contaminant levels known to exist across the site. Soil and groundwater contaminant areas and sources, and the levels that are known to exist across the site will be summarized. Potential cleanup levels associated with current remediation efforts on the Renton Plant property (assumed part of future baseline conditions) will be described relative to proposed changes in land use designations. Remedial steps that may be required as part of future approvals associated with specific redevelopment proposals will be identified. The potential for significant construction -related hazardous waste site impacts and potential mitigation measures will be identified and discussed as warranted. Noise Applicable federal, state, and local noise criteria will be identified and will serve as the basis for evaluating potential noise impacts from the redevelopment scenarios. Noise receivers will be identified in pertinent areas surrounding the site. Receivers will be evaluated for noise impacts from construction and typical onsite operations associated with a potential mix of uses and traffic. Noise measurements will be conducted at several locations both onsite and in nearby residential and recreational areas to identify existing area noise levels. The measurements will be continuous 24-hour measurements, supplemented with short-term spectral measurements as required to characterize noise sources such as aircraft overflights and other specific noise events. The noise measurements will be the hourly energy -average (Leq) sound level, and maximum sound levels (Lmax). These measurements correspond to those used as the basis for FHWA noise criteria and the Washington State noise code. Traffic noise impacts will be evaluated using the FHWA traffic noise modeling program for both future year scenarios 2015 and 2030. Potential noise impacts will be evaluated for specific locations within the traffic study area where projected traffic increases significantly above volumes associated with baseline conditions could occur. Construction noise impacts will be evaluated based on typical construction phases and equipment associated with redevelopment. Noise source levels for the construction activity will be obtained from published sources such as the US EPA, and from a database of comparable equipment. Potential operational noise impacts from onsite activities associated with the redevelopment scenarios will be evaluated relative to noise - sensitive receivers in the area surrounding the site. The relationship of the site to the Preliminary Scoping Document Page 9 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Renton Municipal Airport will be assessed. Under the No Action (Alternative 1) and Partial Development (Alternative 2) alternatives, it is assumed that onsite existing noise sources will include ongoing Boeing -related industrial and manufacturing activity and engine testing on a portion of the site. The impact of noise levels associated with the location of a mix of new uses onsite relative to ongoing operations will be evaluated. Mitigation for any significant noise impacts will be proposed. Water Resources Water resources to be discussed include surface waters, stormwater runoff/drainage, and groundwater. Water quality conditions for identified water resources will also be discussed. Surface/Storm Water Existing drainage sub -basins, runoff patterns, and surface water discharges will be described, including several direct discharge points to Lake Washington and a culvert discharge into Johns' Creek. Specific localized flooding and sediment problems at Johns' Creek will be identified through a Level 1 Downstream Analysis. Existing drainage patterns, runoff rates and stonnwater volumes will be described and/or calculated. On -site drainage and water quality treatment facilities (if any) will be described. Any planned improvements identified by the City of Renton in the Johns' Creek drainage basin will be reviewed and considered as potential future baseline conditions. Post -development drainage flows and volumes from on and off -site redevelopment and infrastructure improvements will be estimated in accordance with the City of Renton Drainage Ordinance for all redevelopment scenarios. Combined flow volumes (i.e., with runoff from ongoing Boeing operations, as applicable) will be assessed. Other potential impacts to surface water discharge locations that will be discussed include: possible erosion and sedimentation during construction and after buildout of the redevelopment scenarios; and, changes in surface water discharge rates and locations. The capacity of existing outfalls to accommodate flows and volumes from potential redevelopment will be assessed relative to existing flows and volumes for Boeing operations and baseline site uses. Stormwater improvements that may be necessary to mitigate for any erosion and sedimentation, and for increases in post -development runoff volumes, will be identified. Groundwater Groundwater levels onsite and immediately adjacent to the site will be described based on past and current investigation. The direction of groundwater flow will be documented. Potential impacts to the groundwater table from construction methods, construction dewatering issues, and potential impacts associated with reuse and placement of pile foundations will be evaluated. The impacts of potential changes in land use and placement of impervious surfaces on groundwater recharge and movement will Preliminary Scoping Document Page 10 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 be evaluated. Measures to mitigate any significant groundwater impacts will be identified. Water Quality Existing water quality information for the Cedar River, south Lake Washington, and Johns' Creek will be documented as available, from city, county, state, and Muckleshoot Indian Nation sources. Existing information will be supplemented by field samples collected for conventional contaminants including oil and grease, turbidity, dissolved metals, fecal coliforms, nutrients, hardness, and in situ pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature. Existing stormwater runoff quality will be described from data in the public record, data supplied by the applicant, or data derived from the literature for similar land uses. Relevant City of Renton stormwater-related regulations, state water quality classifications, and any water quality impairment listings will also be described. Construction -related water quality impacts from potential demolition, dewatering, soils amendments, and soils exposure and management (i.e., Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan requirements and best management practices) will be evaluated. Post -development water quality impacts to receiving waters will be forecast. The forecast will be based on: literature data on the quality of untreated runoff from similar land uses to those proposed under the alternative scenarios, and on water quality improvement levels achieved from treatment facilities similar to those proposed. Forecasted water quality will be compared to existing baseline conditions, state water quality standards, and fisheries sublethal criteria. Mitigation measures will be recommended for any identified significant water quality impacts. Plants and Animals Shoreline and Wildlife Habitat The majority of the site is covered with impervious surfaces. Existing shoreline conditions and habitat along Lake Washington (primarily bulkhead) and the Cedar River adjacent to the site will be described. A site reconnaissance will be conducted. An assessment of the existing shoreline buffer area along Lake Washington and the Cedar River will be provided and upland habitat and habitat value will be described, if present. Any identified critical areas and resource lands relevant to the immediate site vicinity will also be assessed. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife will be contacted regarding any federal and state threatened and endangered species that may use the site or nearby site vicinity. The Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program will also be consulted regarding any priority habitats and sensitive plant and wildlife species. Results of these searches will be documented in the EIS. Potential impacts to shoreline and upland habitats from construction and post - redevelopment will be evaluated including any impacts related to: erosion, water quality, lighting -related changes, and potential increases in human disturbance. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 11 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Fisheries Aquatic and riparian habitat along the Lake Washington shoreline, Cedar River, and Johns' Creek in proximity to the site will be characterized. A site reconnaissance will be conducted. A review of all readily available published information will be completed to determine the existence of previously identified aquatic or habitat concerns and features of the area. Fish resources in identified waterbodies, including species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) will be described. Information will be obtained from the Muckleshoot Indian Nation, local, state, and federal agencies. Usual and accustomed fishing grounds in the site vicinity will be described. The potential for erosion and sedimentation, water quantity and water quality impacts of the redevelopment alternatives will be reviewed to assess any changes in fisheries resource conditions and evaluate the potential for significant impacts to fisheries during and post -construction. The potential for increased human disturbance, lighting -related changes, and fishing pressure in the vicinity (Cedar River and Lake Washington) due to land use changes will be addressed. Mitigation measures will be identified, as warranted. Built Environment Land Use Patterns Existing onsite and vicinity land use patterns will be characterized. A discussion of the site's historical industrial/manufacturing use and a summary of Boeing's consolidation plans related to Boeing operations will also be provided. Existing land use characteristics to be described will include the type and mix of uses, zoning, intensity, density,_ scale, and shoreline uses both onsite and in the surrounding community. Existing Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning classifications for the site and surrounding area will be identified. Proposed changes in land use under each of the redevelopment scenarios will be evaluated in terms of types of land use, areas that would be converted to new land uses, intensity, density, and the character of potential redevelopment. Under Alternative 1 (No Action) and Alternative 2 (Partial Redevelopment), the relationship between uses associated with consolidated Boeing operations and potential new land uses will also be assessed. Compatibility of a range of new uses on -site with surrounding land uses will be assessed. The relationship of the potential uses under the redevelopment scenarios to the City's identified Urban Center designation will be discussed. Impacts related to the proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning text amendments, and from any other applicable modifications to City of Renton development regulations, will be evaluated. Specifically, impacts on surrounding parcels, and on north Renton generally, from changing the land use designations to Employment Area -Transition (EA-T) and/or Center Office Residential (COR) and from implementing new COR zoning for the site will be Preliminary Scoping Document Page 12 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 evaluated. The land use analysis will include a discussion of potential land use tradeoffs relating to the possible elimination of heavy industrial uses in this part of the City over time, versus potential redevelopment to mixed uses and provision of new housing and employment. The relationship of new land uses to the nearby Renton Municipal Airport will be assessed. Potential changes to the shoreline environment associated with potential redevelopment will also be evaluated. Measures to mitigate any adverse on- or off -site land use impacts will be identified. Relationship to Plans and Policies Relevant goals and policies from state, regional and local land use plans and regulations will be summarized. Relevant plans and regulations to be addressed will include, in part, the Growth Management Act, Vision 2020, Countywide Planning Policies, the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations, and the Shoreline Master Program. As proposed, redevelopment of the site to a range of uses would require map and text amendments to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and creation of new zoning designation(s) in the City's zoning code. Proposed Actions are identified and described under the Description of Proposal, above. Proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning text amendments will be described and evaluated. The alternative scenarios will be addressed relative to their consistency with City plans and policies. This will include relevant Comprehensive Plan policies related to land use, transportation, housing, capital facilities, utilities, economic development, and environmental elements. The proposals consistency with other applicable designations (i.e., Urban Center), standards, and regulations will also be evaluated. Parks and Recreation Existing parks, recreational facilities and trails in the site vicinity will be described. Current level of use for potentially affected recreational resources will be discussed based on available information. Any planned park and recreation area capital facility improvements will be described. As a separate action, the City of Renton is planning to develop a pedestrian trail connection from Gene Coulon Park to the Cedar River trail (along or over Lake Washington). This may include improvements to Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) owned uplands and the Lake Washington shoreline immediately adjacent to the site. These improvements, to be sponsored by the City, will be described as information is available. Potential impacts from this facility will be evaluated as part of a separate environmental review process by the City. Recreational facilities and opportunities associated with the redevelopment scenarios will be described. Potential use of these onsite facilities by residents, employees and the Preliminary Scoping Document Page 13 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 general public will be discussed. Potential impacts on existing recreational resources (including Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and the Cedar River Trail) will be assessed. Mitigation measures will be identified, as warranted. Population, Employment, and Housing Existing and future forecasted population, employment, and housing conditions will be presented for the City of Renton and specific areas surrounding the site based on available information. Existing onsite employment will also be described. Future housing and employment needs and targets that apply to the City will be discussed. Numbers and types of jobs that could be created as a result of each of the redevelopment scenarios will be estimated based on the potential mix of uses and standard ratios. Onsite housing and population increases from residential land uses associated with the redevelopment scenarios will be estimated. These employment, housing and population estimates will be evaluated comparatively to City of Renton growth forecasts and targets. Potential impacts of introducing a different employment base and population to the surrounding community will be discussed qualitatively, relative to Boeing operations and overall City of Renton economic development goals. Measures to mitigate any adverse impacts to population, employment and housing conditions will be identified. Aesthetics, Light and Glare The existing aesthetic character of the site and surrounding features will be described. Scenic resources in the surrounding area, including Lake Washington, will be identified. Existing views to and from the site will be described. Key vantage points could include the Southport development, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, the Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington, West Hill, and points of topographic significance across I-405 on Renton Hill and Kennydale. The change in aesthetic character of the site from industrial use to a range of uses will be evaluated relative to potential design, height, scale, intensity, and compatibility with the surrounding aesthetic character for each of the redevelopment scenarios. Impacts to views to and from the site will be evaluated. Potential view corridors associated with site redevelopment options will be described. The relationship of ongoing Boeing operations with potential mixed uses will be assessed relative to aesthetic character. Existing sources of light and glare from onsite industrial operations and nearby locations will be identified. Potential light and glare impacts from site redevelopment on surrounding land uses and Lake Washington will be evaluated. Measures to mitigate potential visual, light or glare impacts will be recommended, as appropriate. Transportation Preliminary Scoping Document Page 14 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 The existing local and regional roadway network serving the site will be described. Transportation elements to be described will include roadway characteristics, critical intersections, existing operations and traffic controls, freeway interchange connections, transit facilities, and non -motorized facilities. Existing peak hour traffic volumes, intersection levels -of -service (LOS), and accident history will be presented as warranted. Conditions at a total of 30 to 40 existing intersections in the study area will be evaluated. The proposed traffic study area to be addressed is generally bounded by the NE 44th Street/Lake Washington Boulevard interchange on the north, the Cedar River on the south and west, and I-405 from NE 44th Street to SR 169 on the east. Potential improvements to the I-405 corridor planned by WSDOT will be described and evaluated as a future baseline condition; improvements will be considered in the formation of assumptions related to traffic volumes, direct access HOV, and transit service levels. In order to accommodate future potential redevelopment to a mix of uses, phased improvements to the surrounding road network will be required. The EIS will describe the relevant infrastructure improvements required for each of the redevelopment scenarios. Potential traffic impacts from construction activities associated with reconstruction of area roadways will be assessed. Potential impacts to the local and regional transportation network under each of the redevelopment scenarios will be evaluated based on forecasted traffic volumes, trip distribution patterns, total peak hour traffic volumes, and intersection levels -of -service (LOS). Parking demand and capacity, non -motorist traffic, HOV/transit service, traffic safety and railroad operations will also be assessed for each of the redevelopment scenarios. The traffic forecasting approach will include using a combination of traditional growth factoring and a Fratar forecasting model based upon baseline assumptions consistent with the Puget Sound Regional Council and Renton EMME/2 models, recent historical growth rates, and known pipeline projects. Two future year scenarios, 2015 and 2030, will be evaluated. Peak hour conditions during both the typical a.m. and p.m. peak periods (7:00 — 9:00 a.m., and 4:00 — 6:00 p.m.) will be evaluated. The trip generation methodology will be established using several sources, including Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) rates, national research, and local mode split and relevant trip generation studies in the Bellevue and Seattle Central Business Districts. Trip generation research and documentation to substantiate assumptions on trip generation rates, internalization, pass -by, and modal split will be developed in conjunction with the City of Renton. Project trip generation will include general purpose, HOV, and transit ridership estimates. Using network forecast factors and scatter distribution diagrams derived through review of appropriate local/regional EMME/2 models, vehicular trip distributions will be assigned to the transportation network manually. Detailed assignment and distribution of "project -only" trips (associated with the respective redevelopment scenarios) onto Preliminary Scoping Document Page 15 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 vicinity arterial and freeway ramp systems will be performed. These "project trips" will be overlaid with baseline traffic forecasts, pipeline projects, and detailed a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour turning movement forecasts prepared for all redevelopment scenarios in both analysis years, 2015 and 2030. A two -tiered mitigation evaluation will be conducted. Local intersection capacity thresholds will be developed based upon the number of trips, access locations, and directionality of project traffic generation from subareas within the redevelopment site. Local arterial capacity thresholds will be developed using larger aggregate subareas within the redevelopment site. Regional capacity thresholds (i.e., access to I-405) will be identified for the redevelopment site as a whole. Ramp metering constraints of general-purpose traffic will likely form the basis of these regional thresholds. These thresholds will also be compared with increased freeway access capacities planned for the I-405 Added Access studies of North Renton area currently underway by WSDOT and the City of Renton. Potential improvements to the local, state, and federal road network required as a result of phased potential redevelopment will be identified. For each redevelopment scenario, relevant mitigation measures for both construction and operational impacts associated with the redevelopment scenarios will be identified, including measures to address, where appropriate, railroad facilities, safety, security, and onsite access. Public Services Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Existing police, fire and emergency medical services will be discussed. Existing City of Renton Police and Fire Department stations, staffing levels, equipment, and facilities that are available to respond to the site will be described. Applicable level of service standards will be identified. Current demand for services (number of calls) will be identified based on available information. Response times and any existing mutual aid agreements between service providers will be described. Current crime rates in the area will also be documented, as information is available. Any planned operational improvements to fire and police services and/or capital facilities improvements will be identified. Potential construction and operational related increases on the demand for police, fire, and emergency services from the redevelopment scenarios will be assessed, including potential increases in the volume of calls and potential impacts on response times. The need for additional personnel will be evaluated with consideration of the potential for phased redevelopment by the year 2030. Impacts will also be evaluated relative to planned capital facilities improvements. The relationship of ongoing Boeing operations with a potential mix of new uses on portions of the site will be assessed relative to onsite security and provision of fire and police services (under the applicable scenarios). Preliminary Scoping Document Page 16 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Emergency access routes and entry points to the site will be identified. Mitigation measures will be identified, as warranted. Schools Existing student enrollment, projected enrollment, and capacity issues will be described for the schools that serve the site vicinity based on available information. Capital facility improvements that may be planned by the Renton School District will be discussed. Existing transportation services available to/from the schools servicing this site vicinity will be described. Potential new students resulting from phased site redevelopment will be estimated for each scenario based on standard student generation ratios. The capacity of the school district to accommodate the projected student population will be generally evaluated, with consideration of potential phased redevelopment by the year 2030. Potential impacts to school bus transportation operations will be assessed. Mitigation measures for identified impacts will be identified, as appropriate. Utilities Stormwater Stormwater facilities and issues related to potential changes in the stormwater management system from the redevelopment scenarios are discussed in the Water Resources section of this Scoping Document. Water Supply Existing City of Renton and City of Seattle water storage and distribution systems in the site vicinity will be described and their current capacities identified. Existing water facilities specifically serving the Renton Plant and surrounding site will be described. Existing system demands will be quantified and available fire flow capacities for the site and surrounding properties will be determined based on available data and as feasible. Any existing problems, limitations, or deficiencies in the existing systems will be assessed. Planned system improvements identified by the City of Renton or the City of Seattle will be reviewed and considered as potential future baseline conditions. Utility severance issues related to separation of the water system between ongoing Boeing operations and new uses will be discussed, as relevant to the various redevelopment scenarios. Estimated water demand for each redevelopment scenario will be analyzed in terms of peak fire and domestic flows; demand related to the potential mix of uses will be evaluated based on assumed land uses and population densities. The capacity of existing systems to accommodate future demands will be evaluated and improvements needed will be identified, as appropriate. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 17 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Wastewater The existing City of Renton/METRO wastewater collection, discharge and treatment system will be described and current capacities identified. Existing sewage collection facilities specifically serving the Renton Plant and surrounding site will be described. Existing system demands will be quantified and problems, limitations or deficiencies will be assessed, based on available data and as feasible. Planned system improvements identified by the City of Renton or METRO will be reviewed and considered as potential future baseline conditions. Utility severance issues related to separation of the sewer system between ongoing Boeing operations and new uses will be discussed, as relevant to the various redevelopment scenarios. Estimated sewage flows generated by each alternative redevelopment scenario will be analyzed based on assumed land uses and population densities. The capacity of existing systems to accommodate future flows will be evaluated and improvements needed will be identified. Preliminary Scoping Document Page 18 Boeing Renton Plant EIS March 24, 2003 Attachment B BLUMEN CONSULTING GROUP TEAM Phase 2- Scoping and Preliminary Draft EIS Boeing Renton Plant EIS Estimated Budget Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. Professional Labor Hours Hourly Rate Total President 500 130 65,000 Senior Associate 600 90 54,000 Associate 480 80 38,400 Admin. Support 180 50 91000 Subtotal 166,400 Graphics 5,000 Reimbursable Expenses 4,000 (including mileage, parking, delivery, printing, etc.) Total -BCG $ 175,400 Subconsultants Transportation Engineering Northwest 143,000 AC Kindig & Company 39,600 KPFF 83,200 Associated Earth Sciences 59,400 BRC Acoustics 57,200 Subtotal $382,400 TOTAL NOT -TO -EXCEED $557,800 Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DENS Services 8 Boeing Renton Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. Attachment C BLUMEN CONSULTING GROUP TEAM 2003 Billing Rates Blumen Consulting Group President $130 Vice President 100 Senior Associate 90 Associate 80 Office Manager 50 Other Rates Auto mileage, per mile- $0.36 In-house photo copies, per page- 0.15 Handling charge on subcontractors and expenses-10% Transportation Engineering Northwest Director $125 Principal 110 Project Manager 95 Project Engineer 80 AC Kindig & Company A. Kindig $130 T. Shugrue 89 D. Zlateff 79 KPFF S. Kingsley $127 B. O'Neill 90 M.Kozak 80 Associated Earth Sciences Principal $140 Project Geologist 86 Clerical Support 38 BRC Acoustics Principal and Senior Acoustical $130 Senior Acoustical Consultant 105 Acoustical Consultant 95 Clerical 40 Note: Rates are valid through 2003 Scope and Budget Agreement for Scoping and Preliminary DENS Services 9 Boeing Renton. Plant EIS Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board Finance & IS Department (FIS) Staff Contact Victoria Runkle, FIS Administrator Sylvia Doerschel, Finance Analyst S SUBJECT: 2003 CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE EXHIBITS: 1. Proposed Ordinance and Attachment 1 2. Issue Memo and attachments A, B, C 17OR AGENDA. OF': April 7, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ............................. Public Hearing .................. Correspondence ................ Ordinance ......................... X Resolution ......................... Old Business ..................... New Business .................... Study Session .................... Information ....................... Other................................. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approvals Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept ............. X April 14, 2003. Finance Dept ......... X Other FISCAL IMPACT: $19,886,600 Expenditure Required $19,886,600 Transfer/Amendment $ Amount Budgeted ...... $ Revenue Generated $ Total Project Budget.. $ City Share Total $ Project ................... SUMMARY OF ACTION: This ordinance does two things. First, it re -appropriates remaining 2002 monies into 2003 primarily for capital projects. This amount is $19,886,600. Also, during the 2003 Budget process, we did not have contract agreements with any unions completed. We placed all the available money to meet our salary agreements in the Non -Departmental Department. This ordinance allocates those monies to the correct funds, thereby decreasing the General Fund and increasing various Funds for a total of $745,700. Further, the Non -Departmental budget is decreased by $897,200; and various departments in the General Fund are increased by this amount. The related money for the Commissioned and Non -Commissioned officers is still held in the Non -Departmental Budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance to adjust the 2003 Budget for uncompleted 2002 projects and redistribute total budget to meet salary and benefit costs. H.\FIN.ANCF\ADMINSUP\2 AeendaBills\2003 Carryfomard Ordinance. doc 1► CITY OF RENTON MLL Finance & Information Services Department MEMORANDUM Date: March 31, 2003 To: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council Via:1 Mayor Jesse Tanner From: Victoria Runkle, Finance & Information Services Administrator Subject: AMENDMENTS TO THE 2003 BUDGET — CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE tv" Jrnvs� ISSUE Legally, we must appropriate monies on a calendar basis. However, it is not reasonable to assume that all activities, projects or expenditures will actually occur on a calendar basis. Often we adopt a budget effective in January of the year, and due to environmental, staffing or other reasons, the activity does not begin until later in the year. However, until the Council re - appropriates monies for that activity in the subsequent year, the activity must stop by the end of the year. The Council then must increase the following year budget — in this case 2003 - for the uncompleted activities of the previous year. In addition, in late 2002 the City was negotiating labor agreements with five bargaining units. At the time of the budget adoption, we did not know what the labor agreements would be so we placed all funds we had for labor agreements in the Non -Departmental Budget — General Fund (0001005). Now that we have agreements for three of the units, and we have determined the compensation for the non -represented group, we are requesting most of these monies be redistributed to their appropriate departments and to the appropriate Funds. Redistributing monies from one department to another in the same Fund does not require a legal appropriation. However, redistributing monies from the General Fund to any other Fund does require Council approval. As will be shown, we are providing information on all distributions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council adopt the carry forward ordinance. To: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council Via: Mayor Jesse Tanner March 31, 2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND The ordinance before you does two things. First, it re -appropriates 2002 monies where the 2002 work program was not completed by the end of the calendar year. These are known as carry forwards. Second it allocates monies from the General Fund, Non -Departmental Budget to other Funds to cover the costs of the final salary agreements. Carry Forwards. At the end of the year, each City department reviews their 2002 final spending plan to determine if all financial obligations have been met. There are situations, for example, where invoice(s) are delayed for payment, project(s) are delayed due to weather conditions, or projects experience construction delays, all of which result in 2002 appropriated funds not being expended in 2002. In these cases, departments request that 2002 funds be carried forward to 2003. These changes increase the previously adopted 2003 Budget. The following attachment to this memo - Attachment A - details all requested changes to the 2003 budget. The requests are organized by fund type. Only the funds with changes are represented in this detail. Attachment B is a spreadsheet that summarizes and totals requests by find. The total carry forward request is for $19,886,600. This is comprised of only $163,200 for the General Fund. The balance is to meet the needs of Special Revenue and Capital Project Funds. There are no new programs in this total request. Labor Agreements. In the 2003 Adopted Budget, we set aside a total of $2,008,100 in the Non - Departmental Budget ($1.5 for salaries and $473,000 for benefits) to meet the assumed needs for our labor agreements. We now have agreements with three bargaining units and the non - represented employees. As you are well aware, these agreements provide, essentially, a three percent salary increase and limits on our health care costs. These costs must now be allocated to the appropriate departments and Funds. The costs in the four employee groups settled to date total $1,642,900. Of this total, the Non Departmental Budget is decreased by $897,200, and other departments in the General Fund increased by that total. The Non -Departmental Budget is then reduced further by the balance of $1,642,900, minus $897,200, which totals $745,700. This amount is then allocated to various Funds as illustrated in Attachment I of the ordinance. The result is the General Fund actually decreases by $745,700. The other Funds actually increase by $745,700. The following illustrates the allocation of salary and benefit dollars. 1-1:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry fonvard.doc To: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council Via: Mayor Jesse Tanner March 31, 2003 Page 3 Salary/ Benefit Dept No. Dept Title Change General Fund 001 Legislative $ 3,500 002 Judical $ 37,700 003 Executive $ 25,500 004 Finance $ 108,000 005 Non Dept $ (1,642,900) 007 Develop Srvs $ 97,200 008 Police $ 86,300 009 Fire $ 426,500 011 Hex $ 4,600 012 Clerk $ 20,100 014 Human Resources $ 21,300 015 PW Admin $ 14,900 017 PW Tech Srvs $ 7,900 020 Human Srvs $ 8,200 023 EDNSP $ 35,500 General Fund Subtotal $ (745,700) 101 Park $ 103 Street $ 106 Library $ 104 CDBG $ 306 Leased Prop $ 401 Water Operating $ 402 Airport $ 403 Solid Waste $ 404 Golf Ops $ 501 Equip Rental $ 502 Insurance $ 260,100 161,300 = $466,600 45,200 8,100 2,700 165,200 21,300 19,400 32,500 23,400 6,500 Thus, each of the Funds listed actually increase by the noted amount. However, because it is an allocation from one Fund to others, the total 2003 Budget does not change. Changes are simply within various Funds. As stated, we began the 2003 Budget process with certain assumptions. Those assumptions translated into us setting aside a total of $2,008,100. Once the appropriation requested in this ordinance is made, we will have $365,200 remaining to cover any settlements with the commissioned and non-commissioned officers. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry forward.doc To: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council Via: Mayor Jesse Tanner March 31, 2003 Page 4 SUMMARY This ordinance increases the total 2003 Budget by $19,886,600. The carry forwards are completely responsible for this increase, and over $19.6 million of that meets capital projects requirements, including $4.9 for the Aquatic Center, $2.3 for the Pavilion Building, and nearly $4 million for the final garage payments. As Attachment I of the Ordinance illustrates, eleven Funds increase for salary and benefits. These increases, however, are offset by the decrease in the General Fund. Thus, the overall Budget does not increase. It is simply a reapportionment of the total Budget. As always, we have provided the Available Fund Balances Sheet for you with the proposed changes in this ordinance. This is Attachment C. We have produced this in color as we discussed at the retreat and hope you find it helpful. In addition to this ordinance, we will be submitting a second ordinance for referral to the Committee of the Whole. This ordinance targets use of Available Fund Balances. All Attachments to that action assume the actions in this ordinance occur. This is because I believe we have agreement that carry forwards are simply a legal action. The salary adjustments are also a contractual agreement impossible not to meet. Budgets are often changing. It is sometimes difficult for us to follow and remember all the changes. Your questions help us keep things clear. Please feel free to call with any questions. Attachments: 1. Attachment A, Explanation of Carry Forward Requests 2. Attachment B, Carry Forwards spreadsheet 3. Attachment C, Available Fund Balances by Fund Type spreadsheet cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Elaine Gregory, Fiscal Services Director Sylvia Doerschel, Finance Analyst Supervisor Jill Masunaga, Finance Analyst Dawna Truman, Finance Analyst Derek Todd, Assistant to the CAO H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_IssuePapers\2003 Carry fonvard.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, INCREASING THE 2003 BUDGET FOR VARIOUS FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING 2002 OBLIGATIONS IN 2003; INCREASING VARIOUS FUNDS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SALARY AND BENEFIT LABOR AGREEMENTS; AND DECREASING THE 2003 GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION ACCORDINGLY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Appropriations in the following Funds are hereby increased as follows for the purpose of paying 2002 obligations in 2003. Fund Fund Name 2003 Expenditures Increase 000 General $163,200 110 Hotel/Motel Fund 61,200 301 Parking Garage 3,952,200 303 Park Mitigation 325,000 304 Fire Mitigation 3,336,800 306 Leased City Properties 34,800 307 Aquatic Center 4,899,500 316 Municipal Facilities CIP 5,071,700 402 Airport 209,300 421 Waterworks Utility 1,832,900 TOTAL $19,886,600 Available fund balances in each Fund shall be used to meet the needs of these appropriations. ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II. In addition, the 2003 General Fund Budget shall be decreased in the following amount and the Other Funds shall be increased in the following amounts to meet the costs of the salary and benefit labor agreements approved after the 2003 Budget was adopted. Fund Fund Name Increase Decrease 000 General ($745,700 101 Park Fund $260,100 103 Street Fund 161,300 104 CDBG Fund 8,100 106 Library Fund 45,200 306 Leased Property Fund 2,700 401 Water Operations Fund 165,200 402 Airport Fund 21,300 403 Solid Waste Fund 19,400 404 Golf Course Fund 32,500 501 Equipment Rental 23,400 502 Insurance Fund 6,500 TOTAL $745,700 ($745,700) The figures for the adopted budgets for each Fund and the new budget figures for each Fund amended by this ordinance are shown in Attachment 1 hereto. Revenues from the General Fund to General Governmental Funds shall be adjusted to meet these changes. The Enterprise and Internal Services Funds shall meet their increased costs using their own revenue sources. SECTION III. The budgets of various General Fund departments shall be adjusted accordingly to meet the costs of the salary and benefit labor agreements. These changes do not require the 2003 General Fund budget to be adjusted, but is for informational purposes only. W ORDINANCE NO. Fund Fund Name Increase Decrease 000 Non Departmental $0 ($897,200) 000 Legislative 3,500 000 Municipal Court 37,700 000 Executive 25,500 000 Finance 1089000 000 Develop ment Services 97,200 000 Police 86,300 000 Fire 426,500 000 Hearing Examiner 400 000 City Clerk 20,100 000 Human Resources 21,300 000 PW Administration 14,900 000 PW technical Services 7,900 000 Human Services 8,200 000 EDNSP 35,500 TOTAL $897,200 ($897,200) SECTION IV. five days after publication. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 3 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1029:2/28/03:ma 2003 CARRY FORWARD AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET ORDINANCE ATTACHMENT I l/1/03 Carry Forward Salary/ Benefit 4/30/03 Dept No. Dept Title Adopted Budget Request Change Amended Budget General Fund 001 Legislative $ 182,100 $ - $ 3,500 $ 185,600 002 Judical $ 1,272,700 $ - $ 37,700 $ 1,310,400 003 Executive $ 784,500 $ - $ 25,500 $ 810,000 004 Finance $ 3,141,300 $ - $ 108,000 $ 3,249,300 005 Non Dept $ 5,468,300 $ - $ (1,642,900) $ 3,825,400 006 Legal $ 1,049,500 $ - $ 1,049,500 007 Develop Srvs $ 3,069,800 $ - $ 97,200 $ 3,167,000 008 Police $ 14,506,000 $ 4,000 $ 86,300 $ 14,596,300 009 Fire $ 11,542,200 $ 14,000 $ 426,500 $ 11,982,700 Oil Hearing Examiner $ 125,100 $ - $ 4,600 $ 129,700 012 Clerk $ 419,800 $ - $ 20,100 $ 439,900 014 Human Resources $ 702,700 $ - $ 21,300 $ 724,000 015 PW Admin $ 334,900 $ - $ 14,900 $ 349,800 017 PW Tech Srvs $ 510,000 $ - $ 7,900 $ 517,900 020 Human Srvs $ 523,300 $ - $ 8,200 $ 531,500 023 EDNSP $ 1,239,600 $ 145,200 $ 35,500 $ 1,420,300 General Fund Sbttl $ 44,871,800 $ 163,200 $ (745,700) $ 44,289,300 101 Park $ 9,250,100 $ - $ 260,100 $ 9,510,200 103 Street $ 5,911,400 $ - $ 161,300 $ 6,072,700 106 Library $ 1,435,100 $ - $ 45,200 $ 1,480,300 201 LTGO $ 654,300 $ - $ - $ 654,300 207 LTGO $ 35,100 $ - $ - $ 35,100 215 LTGO $ 1,871,300 $ - $ - $ 1,871,300 General Govt SBTTL TOTAL GG FUNDS $ 64,029,100 $ 163,200 $ 466,600 $ (279,100) $ 63,913,200 2003 Carry Forward Ord Attachment l.As 1 2003 CARRY FORWARD AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET ORDINANCE ATTACHMENT I l/l/03 Carry Forward Salary/ Benefit 4/30/03 Dept No. Dept Title Adopted Budget Request Change Amended Budget 102 Arterial Street $ 353,500 $ 353,500 104 CDBG $ 295,700 $ - $ 8,100 $ 303,800 110 Hotel/Motel $ 200,000 $ 61,200 $ - $ 261,200 118 Paths $ - $ - $ - $ - 125 1 % for Art $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 127 Cable $ 31,600 $ - $ - $ 31,600 219 Voted Debt $ 511,500 $ - $ - $ 511,500 220 LID $ 334,600 $ - $ - $ 334,600 301 Garage $ - $ 3,952,200 $ - $ 3,952,200 303 Parks Mit $ 950,000 $ 325,000 $ 1,275,000 304 Fife Mit $ 298,000 $ 3,336,800 $ - $ 3,634,800 305 Trans Mit $ 2,451,400 $ - 0 $ 2,451,400 306 Leased Prop $ 516,900 $ 34,800 $ 2,700 $ 554,400 307 Swim Pool $ - $ 4,899,500 $ 4,899,500 316 CIP $ 2,946,000 $ 5,071,700 $ - $ 8,017,700 317 Trans CIP $ 6,661,200 $ - $ - $ 6,661,200 401 Water Operating $ 20,921,500 $ - $ 165,200 $ 21,086,700 402 Airport $ 1,557,000 $ 209,300 $ 21,300 $ 1,787,600 403 Solid Waste $ 9,074,500 $ - $ 19,400 $ 9,093,900 404 Golf Ops $ 2,210,100 $ - $ 32,500 $ 2,242,600 421 Water CIP $ 13,300,000 $ 1,832,900 $ - $ 15,132,900 424 Golf CIP $ 359,000 $ - $ - $ 359,000 451 Water Rev Bond $ 2,920,400 $ - $ - $ 2,920,400 501 Equip Rental $ 2,991,200 $ - $ 23,400 $ 3,014,600 502 Insurance $ 9,047,000 $ - $ 6,500 $ 9,053,500 601 Fire Pension $ 365,900 $ - $ - $ 365,900 Other Funds SBTTL $ 279,100 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 142,401,100 $ 19,886,600 $ - $ 162,287,700 2003 Carry Forward Ord Attachment I.As 2 Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Fund 000 Dive Team Overtime: Due to a lack of water in the Cedar River, the City's swift water rescue class could not be conducted during the Fall or Winter of 2002. The Dive Team is required to have this training, so Rescue 3 International has extended the date of completion. Additional funds beyond the remaining balance at 2002 are required to complete the drill. Total budget for 2003 is $56,600. 2002 Budget $45,000 2002 Expenditures (36,700) 2002 Remaining Balance $8,300 2003 Carry Forward Request: $14,000 2003 Original Budget: 42,600 Total 2003 Budget: $56,600 Small Tools/Minor Equipment — Police: At the end of 2002, additional invoices remained unpaid for various purchases. Carry forward request to cover the unpaid expenditures. 2002 Budget $13,700 2002 Expenditures (6,500) 2002 Remaining Balance $7,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $4,000 2003 Original Budget: 13,700 Total 2003 Budget: $17,700 EDNSP Consulting: Consulting projects as necessary to support Economic Development services, including consultants for the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Total consulting budget for 2003 is $261,200. 2002 Budget $223,400 2002 Expenditures (78,200) *2002 Remaining Balance *$145,200 2003 Carry Forward Request $145,200 2003 Original Budget: Legislative Affairs 36,000 ESA Economic Development 80,000 Total 2003 Budget: $261,200 Detail: *ESA — Economic Development $ 82, 500 ESA — Parks 50,000 Shorelines or ESA 12,70 $145,200 See detail below H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_IssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 1 I :37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Fund 110 Marketing and Tourism: Funds requested are to cover the estimated outstanding Renton Chamber of Commerce invoices for marketing and tourism for 2002. 2002 Budget $275,900 2002 Expenditures (214,700) 2002 Remaining Balance $61,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $61,200 2003 Original Budget: 200,000 Total 2003 Budget: $261,200 Fund 301 Parking Garage: In March 2002, the City began construction of a 7-story Municipal Parking Garage. Six floors will hold 563 cars, with an additional 2,400 square feet of retail space on the ground floor. Expected completion date is Spring 2003. Total project budget for the parking garage is $9,540,400. 2002 Budget $9,540,400 2002 Expenditures 5,588,200 2002 Remaining Balance $3,952,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $3,952,200 Fund 303 Park Mitigation — Park Acquisition: The 2003 budget included $950,00.0 in funding for the purpose of acquiring the Barfield property. This was accomplished in January 2003. Approximately $75,000 is needed for additional closing costs associated with the Barfield property acquisition. Appropriating $250,000 to match any state grants the City may receive for the purchase of additional open space. After 2003 carry forward, total budget is $1,275,000. 2002 Budget $550,000 2002 Expenditures (59,500 2002 Remaining Balance $490,500 2003 Carry Forward Request: $ 325,000 2003 Original Budget: 950,000 Total 2003 Budget: $1,275,000 1-1:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Fund 304 Fire Mitillation — Fire Station #12: In December 2002, construction began on a new fire station, located in the Renton Highlands. The two- story building will house a fire station as well as the City's new Emergency Operations Center, which is for response to large-scale emergencies and natural disasters. Construction will be completed in September 2003. January 1, 2003 Adopted 2003 Budget of $298,000 is designated for the annual debt service payment. Total project cost estimate is $4,999,547. 2002 Budget $4,395,000 2002 Expenditures (608,901) 2002 Remaining Balance $3,786,099 2003 Carry Forward Request: $3,336,800 Fund 306 Mill Avenue Repairs and Maintenance: Funds are used for various emergency maintenance needs as may be necessary. Council will be informed to any issues that may arise. 2002 Budget $890,700 2002 Expenditures 85( 5,900) 2002 Remaining Balance $34,800 2003 Carry Forward Request: $34,800 2003 Original Budget: 75,100 Total 2003 Budget: $109,900 Fund 307 Aquatic Center: Using $5 million of surplus funds from 2001, the Council approved the construction of the new family aquatics center in Cedar River Park. Construction is slated for 2003, with completion scheduled by the end of 2003. 2002 Budget $5,000,000 2002 Expenditures (100,500) 2002 Remaining Balance $4,899,500 2003 Carry Forward Request: $4,899,500 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Fund 316 Veterans Memorial Park: On Veterans Day 2002, the groundbreaking was held for the future Veterans Memorial Park. Scheduled for dedication on Memorial Day 2003 (May 26). Funding for this project came from 2001 surplus funds and tile sales from VFW Post 1263. During 2002, the VFW Post chose to work directly with a tile contractor; therefore, sales revenue was not forwarded to the City. 2002 Budget $414,000 2002 Expenditures (20,600) In Kind Contribution of Tiles (66,000) 2002 Remaining Balance $327,400 2003 Carry Forward Request: $327,400 Technololly — Library System Upgrade/Business Continuity: The library system upgrade includes new computers for public Internet use, as well as software and other upgrades for library material management. The project has been delivered and is in the testing/acceptance phase now. Funds will be released once the City accepts the product. The Business Continuity plan is an ongoing project. Its mission is to establish a remote technology site capable of running primary financial, database driven applications in the event of an emergency that would render the City Hall unusable. Forty -thousand dollars ($40,000) is for the library system, $40,000 is for business continuity. 2002 Budget $80,000 2002 Expenditures (0) 2002 Remaining Balance $80,000 2003 Carry Forward Request: $80,000 City Hall Ramp Improvements: When the City Hall ramp project was constructed, drainage and irrigation problems developed that affected the landscaping. The City and contractor ultimately settled on sharing the cost to fix the problems. Remaining dollars will complete landscaping and tree replacement at PI plaza levels. Total project cost is $25,000. 2002 Budget $51,600 2002 Expenditures (0) 2002 Remaining Balance $51,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $15,000 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Major Maintenance Improvements — Carco Theatre: Structural problems uncovered while installing some of the catwalks could not be resolved during the limited Winter shutdown of the theatre. The remaining work on the catwalk was extended into 2003. 2002 Budget $12,600 2002 Expenditures (0) 2002 Remaining Balance $12,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $12,600 Pavilion Project: Since 1999, on -going renovation project to bring the building to code so that space can be leased as exhibition and meeting venues. The project has been extended to 2003, with an estimated completion date scheduled for May 2003. Council authorized $2,000,000 in expenditures. 2002 Budget $2,300,000 2002 Expenditures (46,800) 2002 Remaining Balance $2,253,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $2,253,200 Main and Grady Major Maintenance: Completion of Main and Grady maintenance includes the purchase of three DVD recorders to replace the VCR's currently used for surveillance cameras for City Hall. Funds will be released once the City accepts the product. 2002 Budget $110,600 2002 Expenditures (15,100) 2002 Remaining Balance $95,500 2003 Carry Forward Request: $35,000 Police Storalle Buildings: The construction of a ten thousand (10,000) square foot building was started in September 2002 to house approximately 30 police department evidence vehicles. Construction is scheduled for completion in 2003. Total project cost is $558,000. 2002 Budget $430,000 2002 Expenditures (318,700) 2002 Remaining Balance $111,300 2003 Carry Forward Request: $111,300 2003 Original Budget: 128,000 Total 2003 Budget: $239,300 FI:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Maior Maintenance- Parks/Highland Park: Highlands Park Irrigation project is currently under contract and construction. Estimated construction completion is Spring 2003. 2002 Budget $100,000 2002 Expenditures (5,300) 2092 Remaining Balance $94,700 2003 Carry Forward Request: $94,700 Maior Maintenance — Parks/Liberty Park Building Removal: Demolition of the underutilized small wood activity building and wood storage shed, design, and construction of new park storage shed. Completion is scheduled for 2003. 2002 Budget $107,800 2002 Expenditures (22,000) 2002 Remaining Balance $85,800 2003 Carry Forward Request: $85,800 Maior Maintenance — Public Facilities: Projects include Coulon Beach restroom renovations, phase one of Renton City Hall P3 resurfacing, and adding flowerpots to the front of the City Hall. Total project cost is $2,574,000 over the next five years. 2002 Budget $385,000 2002 Expenditures (259,400) 2002 Remaining Balance $125,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $104,500 2003 Original Budget: 307,000 Total 2003 Budget: $411,500 _City Facilities RepavinZ — Kiwanis Park: Kiwanis Park's North parking lot removal was not started in 2002, since no funds were budgeted for the topsoil, hydro seeding, irrigation design, and installation. Completion date is scheduled for 2003. 2002 Budget $70,000 2002 Expenditures (11,400 2002 Remaining Balance $58,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $58,600 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Comprehensive Plan Update: The Comprehensive Plan is approximately 80-90 percent complete. Staff is preparing finalization of the Plan with consultant. Scheduled to be completed in 2003. 2002 Budget $59,100 2002 Expenditures (33,900) 2002 Remaining Balance $25,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $25,200 City Neighborhood Beautification: The Gateway Program is part of the City Neighborhood Beautification program to enhance the City of Renton through creation of a citywide urban green space. This will be accomplished by a continuing partnership of city departments, Renton citizens, developers, and the business community. Negotiations are currently underway for a contract with an anticipated start date in February 2003. After the carry forward, total 2003 budget is $59,600. 2002 Budget $30,000 2002 Expenditures 400 2002 Remaining Balance $29,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $29,600 2003 Original Budget: 30,000 Total 2003 Budget: $59,600 Skateboard Park: The construction of the Skateboard Park in Liberty Park was completed in 2001. However, due to greater than expected use of the facility, additional safety features and improvements were identified in 2002 to accommodate the increased number of users to this park. In 2002, bids were rejected twice, resulting in the use of carry forward funds to increase the overall 2003 budget. Total 2003 budget will bring this project cost to $231,000. 2002 Budget $50,000 2002 Expenditures (5,900) 2002 Remaining Balance $44,100 2003 Carry Forward Request: $44,100 2003 Original Budget: 40,000 Total 2003 Budget: $84,100 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Cedar River Trail Extension: This is to fund the extension of the trail at Coulon Park to the existing Cedar River Trail/Boathouse. A consultant was selected and negotiations commenced in 2002 between federal, state, and local agencies. Preliminary design and permit submittal is scheduled to occur in 2003, with construction beginning 2004. The projected budget for this project is estimated at $1,000,000. The City is setting aside $100,000 each year for this project. 2002 Budget $99,800 2002 Expenditures (16,800) 2002 Remaining Balance $83,000 2003 Carry Forward Request: $83,000 2003 Original Budget: 100,000 Total 2003 Budget: $183,000 Park Play Equipment: The playground construction contract is currently underway. Work is yet to be completed for wall repairs, electrical work, light pole acquisition, bench installation, concrete work and drainage improvements. North Highlands Park was completed in 2002, and Coulon Beach, started in 2002, is scheduled for completion in 2003 along with Windsor Hills and Kennydale Beach. 2002 Budget $378,900 2002 Expenditures (242,200) 2002 Remaining Balance $136,700 2003 Carry Forward Request: $136,700 2003 Original Budget: 200,000 Total 2003 Budget: $336,700 Highlands Redevelopment: Due to a sluggish real estate market, there has not been developer interest shown in the redevelopment project. However, in 2003 a developer expressed interest in developing 12 acres in the Highlands. 2002 Budget $1,500,000 2002 Expenditures (0) 2002 Remaining Balance $1,500,000 2003 Carry Forward Request: $1,500,000 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_IssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Renton Visioning/South Lake Washington Redevelopment (SLWR): The first request for $25,000 is for reserving dollars to fund the development of land use and economic development strategies while we look through the transportation and planning requirements of the redevelopment of the downtown, Boeing property in North Renton, Longacres property, and other key areas. The second request for a $50,000 carry forward is to meet the commitment the City made in late 2002 for Explore Life. This contract was signed in late 2002 and no billings came forth during that calendar year. In addition, as a new initiative, the Executive will be asking for this project to be increased. 2002 Renton Visioning Budget 2002 Highlands Improvement 2002 Expenditures 2002 Subtotal *2003 Carry Forward Request: $200,000 115,000 (63,200) $251,800 $75,000 see detail below Detail: 2003 Renton Visioning $25, 000 2003 SLWR 50,00 $75, 000 Fund 402 Airside Landside: Installation of security improvements at the Renton Municipal Airport as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. Improvements include new vehicle gates with a card system, and install perimeter fencing. Completion date is estimated to be 2003. Total project cost is $805,000. 2002 Budget $505,000 2002 Expenditures (295,700) 2002 Remaining Balance $209,300 2003 Carry Forward Request $209,300 2003 Original Budget: 300,000 Total 2003 Budget: $509,300 Fund 421 E. Kennydale Sewer Infill Phase I: Installation of approximately 4,500 linear feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer main in the East Kennydale Sub - basin. The contract for Phase I was not completed in 2002 and has been extended to 2003 due to negotiations on the change order work. 2002 Budget $1,500,000 2002 Expenditures (1,300,500) 2002 Remaining Balance $199,500 2003 Carry Forward Request: $199,500 2003 Original Budget: 2,300,000 Total 2003 Budget: $2,499,500 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_IssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 1 1:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS East Valley Lift Station Replacement: The East Valley Lift Station serves a portion of the Industrial Valley area and is specifically located at the intersection of SW 34th Street and East Valley Road. It is scheduled for replacement to ensure that service is maintained in that area. Design began in 2001 and construction was delayed until 2003. 2002 Budget $650,000 2002 Expenditures (152,600 2002 Remaining Balance $497,400 2003 Carry Forward Request: $497,400 Thunder Hill Access Road Repair. This is a maintenance road for the Thunder Hill Interceptor, located in the Rolling Hills Neighborhood. The contract is complete, with closeout scheduled in January 2003. Carry forward for final billings only. Total project cost is $312,000. 2002 Budget $300,000 2002 Expenditures (259,400) 2002 Remaining Balance $40,600 2003 Carry Forward Request: $1,000 Springbrook Sprin:?s Watershed - Land Acquisition & Fence: This is part of a program to purchase three -acres of the Gallagher properties to protect and expand the City's Springbrook Springs Watershed. Installation of the security fence was delayed to 2003 in order to cover the cost for as -built survey of a new fence line construction along the watershed. 2002 Budget 2002 Expenditures 2002 Remaining Balance 2003 Carry Forward Request 10 $100,000 (81,900) $18,100 $18,100 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 1 137 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Water System Vulnerability Assessment and Update of Emergency Response Plan: This project consists of the development of a vulnerability assessment of the City's water system (from terrorist threat) along with an update of the Emergency Response Plan. Funds are for additional update of the plan as required by Federal Regulations through the Department of Health. Total estimated expenditures are $95,000. 2002 Budget $10,000 2002 Expenditures (500) 2002 Remaining Balance $9,500 2003 Carry Forward Request $9,500 2003 Original Budget: 50,000 Total 2003 Budget: $59,500 Reservoir Re -Coat, Cathodic Protection and Exterior Paintinp_: Application of a protective coating on the exterior and interior of the Rolling Hills steel water reservoir and West Hill reservoir. Painting of Rolling Hills tank was delayed until 2003 to allow seismic upgrade of the tank prior to repainting. Total estimated expenditures are $1,000,000. 2002 Budget $155,000 2002 Expenditures (18,300) 2002 Remaining Balance $136,700 2003 Carry Forward Request: $100,000 2003 Original Budget: 300,000 Total 2003 Budget: $400,000 North Talbot Pump Station Rehabilitation: Construction of project started later than anticipated. Remaining 2002 year-end balance to be used for payment to contractor, consultant and staff to complete project in 2003. Total estimated expenditures are $300,000. 2002 Budget 2002 Expenditures 2002 Remaining Balance 2003 Carry Forward Request: IV $327,000 (129,600) $197,400 $197,400 HAFINANCMADMINSM5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Seismic Up:zrade Rolling Hills and Hi2hiands Tank: This project consists of design and construction for repairs and replacement of the steel bracing on the elevated water storage tanks that were damaged by the Nisqually Earthquake in February 2001. Construction of project was delayed until 2003 due to more time being needed for design. Project completion date 2003. Project estimated cost is $1,045,734. 2002 Budget $650,000 2002 Expenditures (143,100) 2002 Remaining Balance $506,900 2003 Carry Forward Request: $300,000 2003 Original Budget: 600,000 Total 2003 Budget: $900,000 Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan: The Surface Water Utility System Plan is a comprehensive management plan of the City's natural and constructed surface water systems. Additional funding is needed to respond to National Pollution Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. Total estimated expenditures are $100,000. 2002 Budget $100,000 2002 Expenditures 14,300) 2002 Remaining Balance $95,700 2003 Carry Forward Request: $50,000 2003 Original Budget: 100,000 Total 2003 Budget: $150,000 NE loth Street & Anacortes Storm System Improvement Project: This project consists of planning, designing and constructing a neighborhood detention facility and storm system improvements to solve an existing flooding problem in the area and to provide adequate drainage for future land use. Construction of a storm water detention facility was needed due to lack of storage system capacity. The remaining consultant contract dollar amount and extra funding are needed for anticipated project cost increases. Estimated expenditures are $850,000. 2002 Budget 2002 Expenditures 2002 Remaining Balance 2003 Carry Forward Request: WA $184,900 (68,200) $1 16,700 $115,000 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Lower Cedar River Sediment Management Program: This is a continuation of the Cedar River Flood Damage Reduction project. Funding is required for completion of the Cedar River Spawning Channel replacement project. Total estimated expenditures are $2,260,000. 2002 Budget $305,900 2002 Expenditures 24( 9,900) 2002 Remaining Balance $56,000 2003 Carry Forward Request: $50,000 2003 Original Budget: 185,000 Total 2003 Budget: $235,000 Wetland Mitigation Bank: Project consists of developing a plan and then constructing wetlands on two parcels in the valley that were donated to the City. Funding is needed to install a fence along property street frontage to prevent property vandalism and garbage dumping. Total estimated expenditures are $75,000. 2002 Budget $75,000 2002 Expenditures (3,000) 2002 Remaining Balance $72,000 2003 Carry Forward Request: $45,000 Cedar River Basin CIP — Floodplain Mapping: This project consists of updating the FEMA floodplain maps for the entire Cedar River Basin between Lake Washington and Landsburg. Due to a landslide caused by the Nisqually Earthquake, the floodplain map update was revised in 2002 to reflect the current conditions in th is area of the Cedar River. Consultant contract work remains to be completed on floodplain mapping in 2003. Total project budget at 2003 is $210,000. 2002 Budget $116,300 2002 Expenditures (98,000 ) 2002 Remaining Balance $18,300 2003 Carry Forward Request: $18,000 2003 Original Budget: 10,000 Total 2003 Budget: S28,000 13 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_IssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Renton Stormwater Manual: This project consists of updating the City's surface water management design standards for new construction. The updating of the City's storm water management standards is a pending regulatory requirement in response to National Pollution Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit requirements for municipalities. Total estimated expenditures are $70,000. 2002 Budget $100,000 2002 Expenditures (17,500) 2002 Remaining Balance $82,500 2003 Carry Forward Request: $50,000 2003 Original Budget: 70,000 Total 2003 Budget: $120,000 Springybrook Creek Floodplain Map Update: Due to previously constructed capital improvement projects to improve Springbrook Creek channel capacity and reduce flood hazards, the FEMA Floodplain Maps need to be updated. This funding is needed due to unanticipated higher costs in 2003. Total estimated expenditures are $210,000. 2002 Budget $65,200 2002 Expenditures (20,300 2002 Remaining Balance $44,900 2003 Carry Forward Request: $44,000 May Creek Basin Plan Implementation: The May Creek Basin plan identifies surface water ]management problems, throughout the basin. The plan further identifies actions and capital improvements to be implemented by King County, Newcastle and Renton. The plan was delayed in 2002 due to a legal challenge. Total estimated expenditures are $619,000. 2002 Budget $75,000 2002 Expenditure (53,800) 2002 Remaining Balance $21,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $20,000 2003 Original Budget: 100,000 Total 2003 Budget: $120,000 14 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM Attachment A EXPLANATION OF 2002/2003 CARRY FORWARD REQUESTS Rainier Pump Station Upgrade: The project will evaluate and make improvements to the existing Rainier Storm Water Pump Station. The existing pump station is 45 years old and the pumps need replacement. The work planned for completion in 2002 was not accomplished and has been extended into 2003. Total estimated expenditures are $100,000. 2002 Budget $50,000 2002 Expenditures (19,800) 2002 Remaining Balance $30,200 2003 Carry Forward Request: $15,000 2003 Original Budget: 25,000 Total 2003 Budget: $40,000 SW 71h St. Storm System Improvement Project: This project includes installing approximately 3,500 linear feet of storm pipe to replace the existing storm system, or as a parallel storm system, from Lind to Burnett Avenue South. Project design and permitting began in 2002, with construction scheduled for 2003 — 2004. Funding from 2002 for remaining consultant contract and anticipated project cost increases. Total estimated expenditures are $1,300,000. 2002 Budget $200,000 2002 Expenditures (96,300) 2002 Remaining Balance $103,700 2003 Carry Forward Request: $103,000 2003 Original Budget: 700,000 Total 2003 Budget: $803,000 15 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\5_lssuePapers\2003 Carry Forward ordinance narrative v 2.doc Revised 03/24/03, 11:37 AM ATTACHMENT B CARRYFORWARDS 2003 CF Original New 2003 Account number Project Title or Description 2002 Budget 2002 Expense 2002 Balance Request Budget Budget General Fund 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000016 Dive Team Overtime 45,000 36,700 8,300 14,000 42,600 56,600 000.000000.008.5210.0022.35.000000 Small Tools/Minor Equip - Police 13,700 6,500 7,200 4,000 13,700 17,700 000.000000.023.5580.0020.41.000085 Consulting- Economic Development 223,400 78,200 145,200 Legislative affairs & legal counsel 0 36,000 36,000 ESA - Economic Development 0 80,000 80,000 ESA - Parks 50,000 50,000 Shorelines or ESA 12,700 12,700 Other - Boeing, annexations, etc. 82,500 82,500 145,200 116,000 261,200 000 Total Carry Forward Request 163,200 Hotel/Motel Fund 1 10.000000.000.5570.0030.41.000000 Marketing 185,900 135,800 50,100 50,100 100,000 150,100 110.000000.000.5570.0030.41.000002 Tourism 90,000 78,900 11,100 11,100 100,000 111,100 110 Total Carry Forward Request 61,200 275,900 214,700 61,200 61,200 200,000 261,200 Parking Garage 301.000000.020.5940.0073.62.000000 Parking Garage 9,540,400 5,588,200 3,952,200 3,952,200 0 3,952,200 Park Mitigation Fund 303.000000.020.5940.0076.60.020047 Park Acquisition 550,000 59,500 490,500 325,000 950,000 1,275,000 Fire Mitigation Fund 304.000000.009.5940.0022.62.019012 Fire Station 12 4,395,000 608,901 3,786,099 3,336,800 3,336,800 Leased City Properties Fund 306.000003.005.5180.0020.48.000000 Repairs & Maintenance 890,700 855,900 34,800 34,800 75,100 109,900 Aquatic Center Fund 307.000000.020.5940.0000.62.000000 Aquatics Center 5,000,000 100,500 4,899,500 4,899,500 0 4,899,500 Municipal Facilities CIP Fund 316.000000.003.5940.0076.62.003020 Veteran's Memorial Park 414,000 20,600 393,400 327,400 0 327,400 Note: Budget Numbers have been rounded H/Fin/Fin/BudgeUSylvia/2003 CF.xls 3/24/200311:42 AM ATTACHMENT B Account number 316.000000.004.5 940.0018.3 5.000002 316.000000.005.5940.0099.62.015004 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020010 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020018 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020044 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020046 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000003 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020034 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020039 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020045 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020049 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020055 316.000000.020.5940.0076.64.020038 316.000000.023.5940.0073.63.023005 316.000000.020.5940.0076.64.023001 316.000000.023.5940.0019.63.023006 316 Total Carry Forward Request Airport Fund 402.012033.016.5960.0046.63.000000 Waterworks Utility Fund 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045000 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045010 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045340 421.000500.018.5960.0034.63.055540 421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.055160 CARRYFORWARDS t Title or Description Technology - Software -Library & Fire New City Hall Ramp Improvements MM- Carco Theatre Pavilion Project Main & Grady Major Maint Police Storage Buildings MM - Parks/Highlands Park MM-Parks/Liberty Park Building Remova MM - Public Facilities City Facilities Repaving - Kiwanis Park Comprehensive Plan Update City Neighborhood Beautification Skate Board Park Cedar River Trail Extension Park Play Equipment Highlands Redevelopment Highland Improvement Program Renton Visioning 5,071,700 2002 Budget 2002 Expense 2002 Balance 80,000 0 80,000 51,600 0 51,600 12,600 0 12,600 2,300,000 46,800 2,253,200 110,600 15,100 95,500 430,000 318,700 111,300 100,000 5,300 94,700 1 107,800 22,000 85,800 385,000 259,400 125,600 70,000 11,400 58,600 59,100 33,900 25,200 30,000 400 29,600 50,000 5,900 44,100 99,800 16,800 83,000 378,900 242,200 136,700 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 115,000 0 115,000 200,000 63,200 136,800 315,000 63,200 251,800 2003 CF Original New 2003 Request Budget Budget 80,000 15,000 12,600 2,253,200 35,000 111,300 94,700 85,800 104,500 58,600 25,200 29,600 44,100 83,000 136,700 1,500,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 128,000 0 0 307,000 0 0 30,000 40,000 100,000 200,000 0 0 0 80,000 15,000 12,600 2,253,200 35,000 239,300 94,700 85,800 411,500 58,600 25,200 59,600 84,100 183,000 336,700 1,500,000 0 75,000 Airside Landside 505,000 295,700 209,300 209,300 300,000 509,300 E. Kennydale Sewer Infill Ph 21 1,500,000 1,300,500 199,500 199,500 2,300,000 2,499,500 E.V. Lift Sta Repl. 650,000 152,600 497,400 497,400 0 497,400 Thunderhill Road Repair 300,000 259,400 40,600 1,000 0 1,000 Springbrook Springs Fence 100,000 81,900 18,100 18,100 0 18,100 Update Emergency Response Plan 10,000 500 9,500 9,500 50,000 59,500 Note: Budget Numhars have been rounded I H/Fi ludget/Sylvia/2003 CF.xls 3/24 1:42 AM ATTACHMENT B CARRYFORWARDS Account number Project Title or Description 2002 Budget 2002 Expense 2002 Balance 421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.055260 Reservoir Recoat & Cathodic Protection 155,000 18,300 136,700 421.000500,018.5960.0034.65.055530 N. Talbot Pump Station Rehabilitation 327,000 129,600 197,400 421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.055555 Seismic Upgrade Rolling Hills & Highlanc 650,000 143,100 506,900 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065005 Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan 100,000 4,300 95,700 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065145 NE loth & Anacortes Storm System Imp 184,900 68,200 116,700 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065095 Lower Cedar River Sediment Management 305,900 249,900 56,000 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065119 Wetland Mitigation Bank 75,000 3,000 72,000 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065220 Cedar River Basin CIP - Floodplain Mapp. 116,300 98,000 18,300 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065241 Renton Stormwater Manual 100,000 17,500 82,500 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065285 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Updat 65,200 20,300 44,900 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065350 May Creek Basin Plan Implementation 75,000 53,800 21,200 2003 2003 CF Original New 2003 Request Budget Budget 100,000 300,000 400,000 197,400 0 197,400 300,000 600,000 900,000 50,000 100,000 150,000 115,000 0 115,000 50,006 185,000 235,000 45,000 0 45,000 18,000 10,000 28,000 50,000 70,000 120,000 44,000 0 44,000 20,000 100,000 120,000 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065420 Rainier Pump Station Upgrade 50,000 19,800 30,200 15,000 25,000 40,000 42 1.000600.018.5960.003 8.65.065430 200,000 96,300 103,700 103,000 700,000 803,000 421 Total Carry Forward Request 1,832,900 TOTAL CARRY FORWARD REQUEST 19,886,600 Note: Budget Numbers have been rounded H/Fin/Fin/Budget/Sylvia/2003 CF.xls 3/24/200311:42 AM ATTACHMENT C AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BY FUND TYPE GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 201 207 212 215 TOTAL 000 101 103 106 LTGO LTGO LTGO LTGO GENERAL GENERAL PARK STREET LIBRARY City Hall Snr Cntr Shops Misc GOVERNMENTAL + 1/1/2002 Beg FB 6,255,515 2,958,898 974,464 167,679 13,313 23,463 52,941 564,306 11,010,579 + 2002 Actual Revenues 42,443,588 9,287,075 5,877,711 1,484,570 650,054 802 301,616 2,233,691 62,279,107 - 2002 Actual Expenditures 44,909,291 10,982,369 5,915,677 1,425,145 652,068 7 354,557 1,855,730 66,094,844 - Reserve Requirement 2,839,685 878,590 473,254 114,012 753,058 5,058,599 = 2002 Available Ending FB 950,127 385,014 463,244 113,092 11,299 24,258 - 189,209 2,136,243 + 1/1/2003 Beg FB 3,789,812 1,263,604 936,498 227,104 11,299 24,258 - 942,267 7,194,842 + 2003 Budget Revenue 43,447,600 9,348,100 5,911,400 1,435,100 654,300 35,100 1,871,300 62,702,900 - 2003 Budget Expenditures 44,871,800 9,250,100 5,911,400 1,435,100 654,300 35,100 1,871,300 64,029,100 - 2003 Carry Forwards 163,200 163,200 - Decrease Exps for SIB (745,700) (745,700) - Decrease Revenues for SIB (279,100) (279,100) - Increase for Salaries/Ben 260,100 161,300 45,200 466,600 = 8% Operating Reserve 3,589,744 740,008 472,912 114,808 753,058 1 5,670,530 2003 EST Available FB (920,732) 361,496 302,286 67,096 11,299 24,258 CLOSED 189,209 1 34,912 Page 1 of 6 I h:fir-9:finance:fund balances: February 24 2003 Carry Forward Ordinanr the detail 24/2003 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS + 1/1/2002 Beg FB + 2002 Actual Rev - 2002 Act Exp - 2002 Carry Forwards 8% Operating Reserve )nm A-ii.hio rz-4i ,, r:Q ATTACHMENT C AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BY FUND TYPE TOTAL 102 104 110 118 125 127 SPECIAL Arterial St CDBG Hotel/Motel Resv Path/Tr 1% Art Cable Com REVENUE 0 152,968 (4,837) 267,335 2,807 89,287 172,213 679,773 354,942 263,585 209,438 0 15,628 34,288 877,881 353,500 264,536 214,726 0 23,070 30,413 886,245 + 1/1/2003 Beg FB + 2003 Budget Revenue - 2003 Budget Expenditures - 2003 Carry Forwards - Other Use of FB - Increase for Salaries and Benefits Reserve Requirement 2003 EST Available FB 0 0 154,410 I 154.410 0 (5,788) 154,410 (5,788) 353,500 305,000 353,500 295,700 8,100 154,410 0 262,047 2,807 81,845 176,088 516,999 262,047 2,807 81,845 176,088 671,409 200,000 - 75,000 32,700 966,200 200,000 - 75,000 31,600 955,800 61,200 61,200 8,100 126,397 - 280.807 4,588) 74,450 2,807 81,845 177,188 331702 Page 2 of 6 h:finance:finance:fund balances: February 24 2003 Carry Forward Ordinance.xls the detail 3/24/2003 ATTACHMENT AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BYFUND TYPE SERVICE FUNDS — TOTAL 1 SERVICEDEBT + ugob-Coulon Pk gob-Sr + uou/*ctum| Revenue 17047 515879 ' Reserve Requirement = 2uu2Available Ending Fu z 11.492 431.152 1 | 442.647 | 2003 Carry Forwards Other Use of FB MCI- P1 Reserve Requirement 561,899 561,899 Page 3cfG j ATTACHMENT C AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BY FUND TYPE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS 301 303 304 305 306 307 316 317 Garage Corn Dev Mit Fire Mit Transp Mit Ls City Prop Swim Pool CIP Transp CIP + 1/1/2002 Beg FB 9,478,118 1,195,576 988,699 4,129,217 265,672 0 6,542,940 5,537,618 + 2002 Actual Revenue 127,879 425,483 549,638 1,092,179 1,085,643 5,031,600 3,817,238 6,089,230 + Bond Proceeds 3,879,037 - 2002 Actual Expenditures 5,588,238 59,550 694,316 1,200,000 1,240,500 100,452 4,122,668 4,779,560 - Reserve Requirement = 2002 Available Ending FB 4,017,759 1,561,509 4,723,058 4,021,396 110,815 4,931,148 6,237,510 6,847,288 1/1/2003 Beg FB + 2003 Budget Revenue 2003 Budget Expenditures 2003 Carry Forwards Increase of Budget for Sal/Ben Reserve Requirement 2003 EST Available FB 4,017,759 1,561,509 4,723,058 4,021,396 110,815 4,931,148 6,237,510 6,847,288 100,000 290,000 225,000 585,000 610,000 - 2,367,600 5,946,500 - 950,000 298,000 2,451,400 516,900 - 2,946,000 6,661,200 3,952,200 325,000 3,336,800 34,800 4,899,500 5,071,700 2,700 165,559 576,509 1,313,258 2,154,996 166,415 31,648 587,410 6,132,588 e h:finance:finance:fund balances: February 24 2003 Carry Forward Ordinance.xls the detail TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 28,137,840 18,218,890 17,785,284 0 0 32,450,483 32,450,483 10,124,100 13,823,500 17,620,000 2,700 11.128.383 Page 4 of 6 3/24/2003 ENTERPRISE FUNDS + 1/1/2002 Beg FB + 2002 Actual Revenues - 2002 Actual Expenditures - Reserve Requirement = 2002 Available Endinq FB 401 WW Utility 3,108,236 20,682,937 19,999,510 1,654,635 2,137,028 402 Airport 2,947,686 1,840,094 1,604,617 147,208 3,035,955 ATTACHMENT C AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BY FUND TYPE 403 404 421 Solid Waste Golf Course WW Constr 388,190 1,125,421 (892,276) 8,646,485 2,287,567 15,105,353 8,424,640 2,078,762 8,174,312 691,719 183,005 (81,684) 1,151,221 6,038,765 TOTAL 424 451 ENTERPRISE Golf CIP WW Rev Bond FUNDS 234,174 3,019,892 9,931,323 154,233 4,646,722 53,363,391 137,404 4,909,722 45,328,967 2,661,553 5,338,120 251,003 95,339 1 12,627,627 1/1/2003 Beg FB 3,791,663 3,183,163 610,035 1,334,226 6,038,765 251,003 2,756,892 17,965,747 + 2003 Budget Revenue 19,415,800 1,895,100 9,074,500 2,218,500 4,028,000 154,000 3,320,900 40,106,800 - 2003 Budget Expenditures 20,921,500 1,557,000 9,074,500 2,210,100 13,300,000 359,000 2,920,400 50,342,500 - 2003 Carry Forwards 209,300 1,832,900 2,042,200 - Increase of Budget for Sal/Be 165,200 21,300 19,400 32,500 238,400 - 8%Operating Reserve 1,673,720 124,560 725,960 176,808 2,661,553 5,362,601 = 2003 Est Available FB 447,043 3,166,103 -135,325 1,133,318 -5,066,135 46,003 495,8391 86,846 Page 5 of 6 h:fin^ -,�:finance:fund balances: February 24 2003 Carry Forward Ordinanc the detail '14/2003 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS + 1/1/2002 Beg FB + 2002 Actual Revenue - 2002 Actual Expenditures - 2002 Clean Up - Capital Reserve - Fire Pension Reserve - 8% of GG Operating Reserve - Anti Recessionary Reserve 501 502 Eq Rental Insurance 3,090,832 6,517,350 3,117,097 8,333,083 2,760,927 7,261,355 3,000,000 = 2002 Available Ending FB 447 4,931,680 2,100,000 557,398 ATTACHMENT C AVAILABLE FUND BALANCES BY FUND TYPE TOTAL 601 INTRNL SRV Fire Pens FUNDS 5,491,105 15,099,287 161,271 11,611,451 340,212 10,362,494 0 3,000,000 5,312,164 5,312,164 4,931,680 2,100,000 0 1,004,400 1/1/2003 Beg FB 3,447,002 7,589,078 5,312,164 16,348,244 + 2003 Budget Revenue 2,991,200 8,187,400 147,000 11,325,600 - 2003 Budget Expenditures 2,991,200 9,047,000 365,900 12,404,100 - 2003 Carry Forwards - Other Use of FB - Increase for Sal/benefits 23,400 6,500 29,900 - Capital Reserve 3,000,000 3,000,000 - Fire Pension Reserve 5,093,264 5,093,264 - 8% of GG Operating Reserve 4,917,472 4,917,472 - Anti Recessionary Reserve 2,100,000 2,100,000 2003 EST Available FB 423,602 (294,494) - 129,108 Page 6 of 6 h:finance:finance:fund balances: February 24 2003 Carry Forward Ordinance.xls the detail 3/24/2003 13 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept./Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 SUBJECT: Renton Aquatic Center File No. LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF EXHIBITS: Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council. Concur FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted........ FOR AGENDA OF: April 7, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... XX Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Finance Dept.... Other........... Transfer/Amendment.. Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Renton Aquatic Center was published on February 25, 2003. There were no requests for reconsideration and the appeal period ended on March 11, 2003. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed Aquatic Center, subject to the conditions outlined on page 10 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Renton Aquatic Center. February 25, 2003 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Dennis Culp City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H, ECF LOCATION: 1715 Maple Valley Highway SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The construction of an aquatic center featuring a leisure pool, lap pool, changing rooms and concession areas. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on February 11, 2003. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 18, 2003 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 9:04 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Overall Site Plan Exhibit No. 4: Aquatic Center Site Plan Exhibit No. 5: Building Elevations Exhibit No. 6: Building Floor Plan Exhibit No. 7: Utilities & Drainage Control Plan Exhibit No. 8: Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 9: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jason Jordan, Associate Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. Mr. Jordan explained that this site Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 2 plan review would be a recommendation to Council rather then a Hearing Examiner decision due to it being located in the Center Office Residential (COR) zone. The new City operated Aquatic Center would be located within the existing Cedar River Park site. The proposed Aquatic Center is to be constructed in the northeast corner of the site closest to Maple Valley Highway. The Cedar River is located south and east of the subject site. The Community Center Building and Carco Theatre are also located on this site. There is a large parking lot in the central portion of the property. The parks maintenance buildings are located east and south of the proposed aquatic center site. Interstate 405 and Houser Way are immediately west of the site. The Maple Valley Highway is located north and east of the site. The Stoneway concrete plant is east of the site. The Aquatic Center would include a 9,520 square foot leisure pool and a 3,837 square foot lap pool. Activities with this proposal would include recreational uses, swim lessons, therapeutic uses and occasional swim meets. Construction is planned to begin in April of this year and be substantially completed by December 2003. The City expects to operate the pool from approximately Memorial Day to Labor Day weather permitting. Typical hours of operation will be from dawn to dusk. Access to the site is proposed from two locations. The primary access is proposed from Maple Valley Highway where there is a full -signalized intersection. The secondary access, which is limited to a right in, right out, is from Houser Way North. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Determination ofNon- Sign ificance-Mit] gated (DNS-M) with six mitigation measures for the project. There were no appeals filed. Five of the mitigation measures were standard erosion control mitigation measures. The last mitigation measure was for a Fire Impact Fee. Mr. Jordan reviewed several policies from the Comprehensive Plan and how they are applicable to the project. Staff believes that the Aquatic Center is a nice addition to the current recreational uses within the site. The site is already recreational and this would only be augmenting that use in a high quality manner. The applicant is not proposing any additional parking and they have done a fairly thorough investigation of getting pedestrian and vehicular access off the roads to the parking areas and to the aquatic center. In regard to conformance with land use regulations, the COR zone allows Aquatic Center uses as primary permitted uses in this zone. The Development Standards with regard to lot coverage allow up to 65 percent coverage in the COR zone. This particular project only has lot coverage of 6.5 percent with the additional 6,500 square feet of building area. In regard to setbacks, the proposed aquatic center is located 100 feet from the Maple Valley Highway and 500 feet from the Cedar River. It is also located 480 feet from Houser Way and 160 feet from the Stoneway Concrete plant. The Aquatic Center has substantial setbacks that would mitigate any potential concerns from neighboring properties. The required landscaping is already in place as part of the development. The proposed Aquatic Center at 19 feet in height is well below the 125 feet maximum allowed in the COR zone. There are an existing 400 parking stalls at the site. Development code requires one stall per 100 square feet. The zoning code did not have a ratio for parking for swimming pools so staff used the community center type parking requirements for the aquatic center use. This would have required an additional 266 parking stalls for Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 3 the Aquatic Center use; however, the applicant put together a pretty solid argument indicating that the one per 100 square feet is too high for the Aquatic Center and the demand would be far less. Secondly, the Community Center, Carco Theater and the Renton Aquatic Center will have different peak hours of operation and the 400 stalls currently available would be adequate. Staff reviewed this information and administration issued a parking modification for the project. The proposal is located within an existing park site and has already been utilized as recreation. Staff feels that because the existing uses are recreational there should be no impacts to surrounding properties. Construction activities would result in short term noise, dust and traffic impacts; however, these will be limited to the Construction phase and would be subject to a construction mitigation plan. A geotechnical report was submitted for the project. The report indicated that the site is appropriate for this type of use. The ERC did mitigate erosion for the site with the primary emphasis on no impacts to the Cedar River. The ERC mitigation measure should minimize any impacts of the site plan to the site. In regard to questioning from the Examiner, Mr. Jordan stated that after construction the site would be fenced with chain link fence and separated from the rest of the park area for safety reasons. The site is located within the Aquifer Protection Area (APA) zone. There will be some typical pool treatment chemicals on -site; however, they are below the maximum allowed for the APA zone. Staff expects that the Aquatic Center would increase the property values in the vicinity of the site. A traffic study was not required for this project. The project is not providing any additional parking but what the applicant has done is propose some extensive striping. There is already a paved walkway from the parking area next to the Maple Valley Highway that leads right past the site and continues on to the other buildings. With respect to parking in the main parking lot the applicant has put together a fairly good striping plan to allow for safe vehicle and pedestrian movement. The Aquatic Center is largely comprised of an open outdoor recreation area. There are some buildings but they are limited to 19 feet in height and located in the south corner and staff does not expect these buildings to impede any light or air circulation to the site. The buildings are not going to impact any of the other recreational opportunities in staffs opinion. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts related to increased traffic and activity normally associated with recreational use. The Fire and Police Departments have indicated that they have sufficient resources to adequately accommodate the subject proposal provided the applicant pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee. Police did extensively review this project and do have concerns with safety and did have some suggestions for the construction phase of the project. Staff does not expect any neighborhood deterioration or blight and in fact expects the opposite. One of the criteria for the COR zone is that planning incorporates public and private open space to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation. The site is entirely dedicated to recreation and has both active and passive recreation opportunities. Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LIJA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 4 The plan does provide view corridors to the shoreline areas. Staff does not expect any view corridors to be blocked. The project is setback over 500 feet from the Cedar River and the buildings are limited to 19 feet in height. There is still. access to the Cedar River and the aquatic center will not be blocking access in any way. Mr. Jordan stated that there is additional review criteria for the COR zone and asked to clarify that typically for the COR zone there is a requirement that the site plan reviews go through a Level II Site Plan Review. Because this proposal did not go through a Level 11 Site Plan Review, the additional criteria must be reviewed. Staff does not believe that the two buildings would be an over concentration. The majority of the site is still predominantly open space. The applicant attempted to locate the pool in a more flat area so that less grading would have to occur and to be the least impact to the Cedar River. The lighting plan clearly shows that the lighting would be adequate for not only safety but also security and the lighting does not spill onto neighboring properties and certainly does not spill onto the Cedar River site. Staff believes that the applicant has put together a good site plan trying to tie in the natural areas and the open space areas. The structures proposed should not be an overburden to the existing site or be out of scale with the existing buildings on the site. The applicant will not be adding any additional impervious surface due to parking. The swimming pools will be tied into the sewer system_ The swim decks are below the threshold for any type of water quality treatment. This is a very low impact development on the existing Cedar River site. Mr. Jordan added that there would be quite a few landscaped areas throughout the site. Staff recommends approval of the Renton Aquatic Center with no conditions. Boris Srdar, Northwest Architectural Company, 2201 61h Avenue, #1405, Seattle, WA 98121 stated that this is the first facility of this type in the area. This is the third project of this kind that he has worked on. Experience tells them that about 50 percent of people who use the pools do not require parking. These types of facilities are very popular with children from the age of seven into their early teens. Most of the vehicles that do park are not single occupancy vehicles they are families with children. These facts combined with the occupancy rate of the facility means that less then half of the parking would go to the pool. In response to questioning from the Examiner regarding fencing, Mr. Srdar stated that given the priorities of the pool and the amenities to meet the base cost they have decided to use the chain link fencing rather then a wrought iron or something else. Mr. Jordan stated that he has checked with the applicant and the difficulty is the budget. They all agree that the wrought iron fence is much more aesthetically pleasing. One issue is that on the northwestern boundary of the pool the fence has to be a certain height because of the location of the ball fields. It may be possible to use wrought iron in the front of the aquatic center and have the rest be painted cyclone. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:57 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H;ECF February 25, 2003 Page 5 Findings: l . The applicant, Dennis Culp, representing the City of Renton, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a new Aquatic Center. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit 41, 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non - Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located 1715 Maple Valley Highway. The subject site is located on the south side of the highway immediately east of 1-405 and just east of downtown Renton. The subject site is located in the northeast corner of the Cedar River Park complex that contains the Renton Community Center building and Carco Theater. The Cedar River is located south of the subject site. 7. The subject site is approximately 240 feet wide (Maple Valley Frontage) by 320 feet deep. The subject site is approximately l .75 acres of the approximately 20-acre park site. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1212 enacted in April 1945. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Center Office and Residential uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The subject site is zoned COR (Center Office Residential) a zoning designation applied to the subject site in June 1993. The COR zone permits parks and aquatic facilities. 11. The site east of the subject site, the concrete plant, is also zoned COR. The concrete plant is in the process of being decommissioned. There is a CA (Commercial Arterial) zone north of the site, across Maple Valley Highway. The Cedar River corridor and slopes on its south side are zoned RC (Resource Conservation). 12. The applicant proposes developing an Aquatic Center that contains four components. It will contain two outdoor pools including a 9,520 square foot leisure pool and a 3,837 square foot lap pool. Complementing the two pools will be two buildings. These buildings will be approximately 6,500 square foot. There will be a changing rooms building that is approximately 32 feet wide by 160 feet long located in the southern portion of the site. The concessions area will be west of the changing area and will be approximately 48 feet square. Additional restrooms are located in the northeast corner of the site. 13. The leisure pool will be an elaborate facility with river area, wave area as well as a plunge area and other features. 14. The buildings will be one-story or approximately 19 feet tall. The COR zone permits buildings of 10 Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 6 stories or 125 feet tall. 15. There will be internal landscaping and the applicant will be taking advantage of existing landscaping that borders the existing park along its edges and frontage. 16. Staff analyzed the parking requirements for the use as well as the other uses that share the entire site. Currently there are 400 parking stalls located on the site serving the community center and the theater. The Community Center requires one stall per 100 square feet or 354 stalls and those are all provided. Carco Theater requires one stall per four fixed seats or 75 stalls and only 46 are provided. That's a deficit of 29 stalls. Code does not specifically address either pools or the more elaborate Aquatic Center. Staff compared the use to indoor or outdoor arenas or stadiums, which require one stall per 100 square feet like the Community Center itself. Staff calculated the Aquatic Center would require 266 stalls. The City's consultant reviewed the site, parking usage and similar uses and determined that the existing 400 stalls could reasonably serve the pool patrons. In addition, they anticipate that the theater and pool would have different demand hours. They expect a number of the patrons to be children who will be dropped off by parents or arrive by bicycle or in carpools with friends. The applicant noted that there is room on the grounds to provide additional parking if it is determined that their is insufficient parking. They would prefer saving the lawn areas if the parking were unnecessary. The applicant was granted an Administrative Parking Modification from the Code based on these various analyses. 17. The subject site will have two points of access. The main entry will be the signal -controlled intersection along the Maple Valley Highway. A second access is Houser Way via a tunnel under I-405. There will be a pullout near the entrance to the pool complex to allow drop-offs. Traffic will circulate around the east side of the new complex. 18. The new complex will be approximately 500 feet from the Cedar River. It will be setback approximately 480 feet from Houser Way and slightly less from 1-405. The complex will be setback approximately 100 feet from the Maple Valley Highway and 160 feet from its eastern property line, the one shared with the cement plant. 19. The proposal requires 10 feet of landscaping along the Maple Valley Highway setback. The current landscaping will provide that setback. 20. The development of the swimming complex will result in the loss of lawn area replaced by the complex as well as a large Big Leaf Maple and nine Pin Oak trees. 21. The applicant proposed using chain link fencing to provide security around the subject site. The pool needs to be protected from illegal entry, particularly after hours. The applicant also noted that the pool and its patrons need to be protected from balls that might go astray from the nearby playfields. This office suggested that since the applicant considers this a gateway site for the City that more appropriate, aesthetically pleasing fencing such as wrought iron be used. The applicant indicated budget constraints might limit the ability to upgrade but might be able to use it along the Maple Valley frontage. 22. The aquatic center would replace the previous pool (Henry Moses Pool) at Liberty Park, which was demolished in 1999. 23. Construction of the complex is planned to begin in April 2003 and be substantially completed by December 2003. 24. The subject site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. No impacts on water quality are anticipated. The Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 7 storage of pool cleaning chemicals will follow standard practices. Conclusions: The COR Zoning requires that an approval of a Site Plan be done by the City Council in this case. The COR zoning provides an extensive list of criteria to judge whether a proposal is appropriate in the zone as well as criteria for a Level I Site Plan as well as the normal criteria for Site Plan review. Some of the criteria overlap. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. The COR designation in the Comprehensive Plan suggests a coherent, high quality development that takes advantage of natural amenities. The proposed complex has been designed to provide a center for recreational opportunities in a unified campus. The pool complex has been designed to fit in with the general size and scale of the existing Recreation and Carco buildings. The low-rise nature is intended to keep the site open appearing and minimize impacts on the nearby Cedar River. 4. The one-story buildings, the setbacks and landscaping meet the limits provided by the Zoning Code. Detailed analysis of building code and fire code compliance will be determined when the building permit is submitted for review. The proposal has been granted a modification from parking standards based on an analysis of current parking demands as well as projected demands of the specific use. The low-rise complex should have few if any impacts on surrounding properties. The complex is setback 160 feet from adjoining private property to the east. It will have a I00-foot setback from Maple Valley and is separated from the Cedar River by the other uses already established on the subject site. The use of chain link fencing for such a prominent site is unfortunate. If the City can fund an upgrade to make this gateway site more aesthetically pleasing it should do so while, clearly, not compromising the safety and security of patrons and the complex itself. 6. The open space at Cedar River Park will be diminished by the complex and some older, larger trees will need to be removed. The tradeoff is providing a quality swimming complex and new landscaping inside Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 8 the complex should soften its appearance especially when coupled with the existing landscaping. The construction will have clear short-term impacts including noise. The completed facility should have few impacts other than possibly noise associated with boisterous patrons. It will also probably generate additional visitation to the park during the summer months when the pool is operating. 7. The development should not adversely affect property values. It is planned as a high quality addition to the recreational amenities offered by the City. 8. The proposal will use the existing parking lot, which has proved adequate in both terms of efficiency and circulation. The pool complex will have a drop-off lane near its entrance to accommodate parents dropping off children to use the complex. The applicant will be restriping some of the parking and walking areas to accommodate pedestrians. 9. There will be adequate light and air in and around the one-story, open pool complex. 10. There is a full complement of public services to accommodate the facility. I I. The subject site is not located in the Urban Center Design Overlay area and is not subject to those special regulations. 12. Section 4-9-200EIk provides "Additional Special review Criteria for COR Zone Only:" and those in part include: 1. The plan is consistent with the Planned Action Ordinance, if applicable. 2. The plan creates a compact, urban development that includes a compatible mix of uses where appropriate. 3. The plan provides an overall urban design concept that is internally consistent and harmonious with development on adjacent sites. 4_ The plan incorporates public and private open spaces to provide adequate area for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site and/or protecting existing natural systems. 5. The plan provides view corridors to the shoreline areas where applicable. 6. Public access is provided to water and/or shoreline areas. 7. The plan provides distinctive focal points such as public area plazas, prominent architectural features or other items. 8. The plan assures adequate access to public streets. 9. The plan accommodates and promotes transit, pedestrian and other alternative modes of transportation. 13. The Aquatic Center proposal does not need a 'Planned Action Ordinance." 14. The Aquatic Center is part of an urban park system. It contains, as a park should, open space. It is not an inherently compact urban proposal but concentrates many of Renton's community recreation facilities in Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 9 this one location. 15. The entire park concept has been developed to be homogeneous. While new elements such as the pool complex and the Community facility are or have been added, they are designed to blend with the existing park and facilities including the Carco Theater. Development around the site is sparse with I-405 and the Cedar River providing the most defined uses and the cement plant being phased out over the next few years. 16. The park provides its own open space unlike a private development proposal. The immediate pool complex provides the open water pools and two smaller buildings. The new complex should not affect the existing natural systems, which would be the Cedar River and the underlying drinking water aquifer. 17. The proposed aquatic complex should not severely impact any view corridors. Other buildings are already located between the Maple Valley Highway and the Cedar River. In addition, nothing about the new complex would detract from current access to the river and it's viewing and seating areas. 18. The aquatic center probably will become a new focal point for the Cedar River Park in itself. The entire recreational complex, though, serves this function. Hopefully, a more aesthetic fencing arrangement can further enhance the complex's prominent features. 19. The park's location at the intersection of the Maple Valley Highway and I-405 should assure access to public streets. The wall of I-405 and the Cedar River limit access but the City has managed two points of access, which seems appropriate. Two points of access also limits the number of driveways within the park system making it more internally user friendly. 20. The site is adjacent to the Cedar River trail system as well as the state and interstate highway system. Access should be reasonable. 21. Finally, another set of criteria, those for a Level I Site Plan (Section 4-9-200F), must be reviewed. Some of the criteria overlap those reviewed above. The criteria contain the following provisions: Review of Impacts to Surrounding Properties and Uses. 2. Review of Impacts of a Proposed Site Plan to the Site. Review of Circulation and Access. 4. Review of Signage. Special Review Criteria for Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities. 6. Review of Street Frontage Landscape. 22. Again, the development of the new aquatic complex should not impair the use of any surrounding properties or uses. It should not bring unnecessary traffic to the area and such traffic would be limited, after construction, to passenger vehicles in the main. The hours will generally not conflict with peak hour traffic demands. The buildings and pools have been located so as not to impact adjacent park or non -park uses. The design, as a whole, should enhance the general look of the campus and is designed to appear to be part of the existing campus. Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 10 23. As already noted, the development will decrease the open space at this park. That seems a justifiable balancing of the interests inherent in creating a summer swimming venue at an existing, centrally located park facility. The applicant has minimized the intrusions but some loss will occur_ 24. The two points of access are pretty well defined by the location and existing development pattern of a parcel located in the southeast quadrant of the I-405/Maple Valley Highway intersection. The main, signalized intersection will provide reasonable access to all points of the City. The secondary Houser Way tunnel is a limited but available route that has served reasonably well. The combination has limited the number of entrances and maintained parkland. The applicant has provided for internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation. A drop-off will provide a safety zone for arriving vehicles dropping off pedestrians. 25. The Park already has signs. As staff noted, any new signs would meet the City's own requirements. 26. While some chemicals for treating the pool might be considered hazardous, their number and quantity will be limited. Staff reported that they would be below triggering thresholds of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance. They would also be stored in legal forms and containers. 27. The applicant will not be altering any of the landscaping found along the streets adjacent to the subject site. Some ten larger, mature trees will be removed to accommodate the proposal but these are not frontage trees. hnternal landscaping as well as the leisure pool will serve as both landscape and water elements for the new aquatic center. 28. In conclusion, the proposed Aquatic Center appears to be a well -designed complex in its own right but also will be well integrated into the existing facilities located at Cedar River Park. It will replace a solely missed element; the now closed Henry Moses Pool, in summer fun in the City. Recommendation: The City Council should approve the Site Plan for the City of Renton Aquatic Center subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. If the City can fund an upgrade to make the fencing of this gateway site more aesthetically pleasing it should do so while, clearly, not compromising the safety and security of patrons and the complex itself. ORDERED THIS 25'h day of February, 2003. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EYAMfNER Renton Aquatic Center File No.: LUA-02-147,SA-H,ECF February 25, 2003 Page 11 TRANSMITTED THIS 25'h day of February, 2003 to the parties of record: Jason Jordan 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dennis Culp 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Boris Srdar Northwest Architectural Company 2201 6'h Avenue, Suite 1405 Seattle. WA 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 25'h day of February, 2003 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division South County Journal Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., March 11, 2003. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. - 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 RUP) R-8 CDR ... ... ... .. -- --------- r RC G4 - 20 T23N R5E E 1/2 ���o ZONING - - - - F4 PIWPW TYCMMCAL MRVICES 03/B/02 17 T23N R5E E 1/2 (S 5317 QGJ AREA OF WORK yl�Nll �� C!) I— W � d a uj o Z n g o z LLI Z W U U H Q C Z a O � Z Z zLLJ C� \ 2101 Sim AWIUE SUITE "C5 SEATTLE.. WA 98121 (209) K1—i522 FAX (206) Hl-7G17 NAC No. 2-02072 p FILE WAN o DRAWH DAE CHEOCO B$ N DATE 12-20-02 0 too 200 NEIGHBORHOOD A DETAIL MAP V = 200' 1 �I. IIII+ �`�@gam,, P{( r� r ,. • ` I ice . TE-5o.04 4.04 Itca+c-w 71, sa— JETS TREAY ITS v TOTAL POOL AREA; ACTIVITY POOL — 9.520 SF w+uu ¢.o.w (17'CONG-SE) /SPIM Fk DWV NJ a/ ASSN. TW I I wu's y XvIkl L q-71" wuss t 5 P. WSNCS S , MIisP[:lAltm SIGN YyPIM PARKWG ONLY ce Tn. I TE-S 12t IC.47.4I (Ii'GGNG-NY) Cr 4Lu IN w I U TRUE NORTH `` K a �z a u PROJECT N RTIH637u 24N �070 5 P.S. a . ,-mn CV siGN -DipY PARKWG P'1 wKUIT A ',IL. OYR k SECTION THROUGH ENTRY CANOPY IAI e' it77n k TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH LOCKER WING SOUTH ELEVATION - MAIN ENTRY EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION - POOL SIDE OF LOCKER WING WEST ELEVATION - CONCESSIONS NORTH ELEVATION - MECHANICAL ROOM NORTH ELEVATION - POOL SIDE OF CONCESSIONS AND ENTRY NEVIg IONg N U) w W CL W � V � W Q = g� ,K«vE R.•M1C v �,�ll ]-0307] EILV m es 11-N-0] MGHITECTUML ELEVATICN3 (} SCALE: ,re• • T-0• r" r R16tm WM Call REVISIONS ®� before you Dl9• Io 1-800.424.5555 _ SCALE 1'•20' ,Nr+•w.P •+NR rv�l E `U O °0 OWNER CL z - o, "u - smwan ssr.tts (>Y+sJ W 0 as soup, wo+ rr o woK uw � � U u uUl tso-um omYl: ttrNs +w = W LU 0 erJHEER Z t z -q. 7 s,r alty vWiRUi sGrRC rt y10, J (m1 stsnwo wnsn: snK rono SURVEYOR s. •t ON c n •••e Qpa 2. VNOt' IIfK( u9 �,, sums. n u,os Intl sU-tlN mnY+: N srsuws SHEET WDEX bWt I� C00 <bp LYP CIO OfYttROu ,1,w cl,l cw vR rti" I, COUCNUM Pc RYfK IUMOUN LEGEND • • •, Laos ttY•M Maw Z U n .t„ry C) U rtRuu w. L}•"j Q mt W O c YIrt� z n¢ rIT�R{Iw1 ��(''�U 1�5rj .�: tarpv IrwUl —.— tma, +, —,w— —I+— 'uRt1YY ISO W- R1DIW,t Wt --'— —mot r<((��1nnM I�YIl1 wtx ,w1w pWq -•.-••• MAG 40 CC71A6 Q1 now a .Nrortcrcw ; � • ni WM iAl♦' .,m usronYuml• �c awp •.� atr now taAu w mw/vm wo"tNuetrt� M4.X WAM -o -o C1.1 CNII BITE PLAN hyld Woll H18ON z HibON in3i I - ---------- -- ---------------- - ------- ---- ---------- ---------------- --- liold"I 12M 1"["l ti 11 I v --------------------- L ---------------- ---------------- -------- ------ -------- It II I 11 Om'An' "ON ins n' 0. vol"O"WDU '311MOn 2.). __3 w-o- .—I 'Nis 3K K 30 Lom'nA IOiw,swd ow uo. .1 L.. Ina o y nlsNL. ONOISYA MOf Q)sn 30 NSIO OHY .1 y 39 n. 30� viv, $1. .1 y Ilt a., smw 'mm uoos )a -nm am s-,a I 1YT36"" A K—dUd YO,bkX) I W il n- IM26M I1UN3063h MN 3—U 1 30 — 20W .,3.,,, .,Ilms am, N'W ni 'SMOD �0N5 ION QIM— ILS-NO 1 1 I :SSWO Om 03tl0003tld dMI 29 1. 12. S.41­ CMOs 38 11. �j mvldud AIK - - - - - - - - - - - CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Human Services Staff Contact...... Karen Bergsvik, ext: 6652 Subject: Revised policies for the Housing Repair Assistance Program Exhibits: 1. Issue Paper 2. New Policies 3. Old Policies 4. 2003 Income Guidelines Al #: For Agenda of: April 7, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept ..... x.... Refer to Community Services Committee Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. . SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Human Services Advisory Committee recommends adoption of the revised policies. The Committee reviewed them, looked at the existing clientele of the program and the demographics of Renton overall, as well as the requirements of Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). In 2003, $185,000 of CDBG capital funds was allocated to the program. A mission statement was developed as part of the revision of the bylaws. The mission is: The City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program (HRAP) maintains affordable housing for low/moderate income homeowners by providing minor home repair services that maintain the health and safety of its occupants, preserves the dwelling, adapts for disabilities, or conserves energy. The City Council adopted the first policies for HRAP in 1998, and therefore needs to adopt the revised policies in 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend concurrence with the staff and Human Services Advisory Committee recommendation for adoption of the revised policies of the City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program. ►91 Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 31, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council VIA: �� Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Jim Shephe d,-, Community J ervices Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Ber sviik, ext. 6652 J Human Services Division SUBJECT: City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Pro ISSUE: The first policies for the Housing Repair Assistance Program were adopted by the City Council in 1998. These policies are outdated and should be revised. The revised policies need to be adopted by Council. RECOMMENDATION: As per the Human Services Advisory Committee recommendation, adopt the revised polices for the Housing Repair Assistance Program (HRAP). BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The HRAP program was started in 1976 using federal Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) as its primary funding source. It has evolved to having two full-time staff and an annual budget of $185,000. CDBG capital funds are still used to fund the program which means the program must comply with numerous policies and regulations at the federal, state and county levels of government. The federal Housing Urban Development Department (HUD) oversees CDBG funds. HUD requires that household income cannot exceed 80% of King County's median income. For a family of four, that is $56,500; and for a family of two is $45,200. Furthermore, HRAP must meet a federal objective for CDBG in order to qualify for funds. The national objective is that it must benefit low -and -moderate income persons. March 31, 2003 Page 2 HRAP must also comply with the lead -based paint regulations. At the county level, preserving affordable housing for low -and -moderate income households is a community development objective. King County requires the program to collect detailed demographics on the clients it serves. Renton's Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element (1998), Policy H-58 states. "encourage preservation, maintenance and improvements to existing affordable housing". The Housing Repair Assistance Program does this for low -moderate income homeowners within the City limits of Renton. In 2001, Renton had 10,780 single, family detached units of which 47.8% are owner occupied. Approximately 10% of Renton households have incomes below 30% of median income; 14% have incomes below 30-50% median; 14% have incomes between 50-80%. Combined, 38% of Renton households have incomes that are considered low to moderate low income. Extrapolating from this data, there are 1,958 low -moderate income owner -occupied, single family, detached units that are eligible for this program. (This does not include condominiums which are also served by the program.) 42% of Renton's housing stock is 22 years old or younger. 58% are older than 22 years. As homes age, more problems occur and more repairs are needed. It is important to maintain the existing housing stock because it is the only affordable housing for many people. In 2002, 144 unduplicated households were served by the program. 81 % were White, 7.8% Black/African American, 3.9% Hispanic and 3.9% American Indian/Alaskan Native. 56.6% of the "active clients"' are over 65 years of age, as compared to 10.2% of Renton's population who are over 65. 39% of the clients are very low income; 40.9% low income and 19.7% moderate income. 16.3% of the active clients reside in mobile home parks. In 2001, HRAP was primarily serving older adults and was going to many of the same homes numerous times per year for emergency, minor and cosmetic repairs. The services the program provided were not clearly defined and there were no written operating procedures for staff. Staff decided it was time to re-evaluate the program and develop new policies and procedures. The first step was to develop a mission statement, which, in turn, would help define the services provided. The proposed mission statement is, "The City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program maintains affordable housing for low -moderate homeowners by providing minor home repair services to maintain the health and safety of its occupants, preserves the dwelling, adapts for disabilities or conserves energy." 'Those 350 clients have received services in the past 6 years. March 31, 2003 Page 3 Proposed changes include: • Dropped requirement that resident needs to live in dwelling one year and housing unit must be over five years old. Found that many low-income homeowners bought homes that needed repairs within one year of service and that not all homes are covered by warranties. • Program limitations were clarified. • Increased the repair budget limitation from $1,000 or less per job to $5,000 per dwelling every ten years and no more than $2,000 spent in one calendar year. Found that "jobs" were difficult to define when a home had multiple repairs and that some repairs cost over $1,000 (usually plumbing). • The categories of emergency and minor repairs were combined into "repairs". Priority for repairs is no longer decided solely by the assets of the household; it is decided by seriousness of the repair; the hardship to the client if the repair is not done in a timely manner; the scope of work, date of request and income/assets of the household. • The services provided are clearly defined, so clients and staff are clear on what the program does. Services not related to the mission are no longer done. • Smoke detectors and/or carbon monoxide detectors are now installed in every client's home. • The summer program only does exterior house painting; gutters are cleaned and repaired year-round. CITY OF RENTON Community Services Department/Human Services Division Housing Repair Assistance Program 2003 Draft Policies The Housing Repair Assistance Program provides and promotes the repair and maintenance of housing for individuals and families of low/moderate income living within the Renton City limits. The Housing Repair Assistance Program is funded through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and must conform to CDBG regulations. These regulations provide overall guidelines that must be followed but are designed to allow agencies greater flexibility in program implementation. Due to increased demand and limited resources of the Housing Repair Assistance Program, the following policies have been adopted to assist staff in implementing this program. Meeting the eligibility requirements listed below does not guarantee services will be provided. In order to maximize the effectiveness of the limited resources available, staff will be responsible for interpreting and applying the policies set forth below and will make the final determination on the provision of services. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES • Provide minor housing repair services to homeowners with low/moderate incomes. • Maintain the ability of clients to remain in their own homes and to be independent. • Encourage the participation of service providers, the business community, and the citizens of the City of Renton to support housing maintenance and repair assistance to the local community. • Housing repair services will focus on maintaining the safety and health of the occupants; preserving the dwelling and/or conserving energy. • The program will strive to have low/moderate income Renton homeowners as clients, that reflect the most current demographics of the City of Renton. H:\HUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/1/2003 GENERAL PROGRAM POLICIES Eligibility Requirements In order to be considered for services in this program, the applicant must: A: Reside within the Renton city limits. B: Own or be purchasing the dwelling and reside in the dwelling requiring services. The home cannot be for sale at the time services are requested. C: The gross annual income for the household must not exceed the moderate - income level by household size as defined by HUD current income guidelines. Program Limitations • Staff may deny services to any dwelling where an unsafe or unhealthy working or living situation exists. • Services will not be provided if the repair work is covered by the homeowner's property insurance policy or by warranty. A copy of the homeowner's policy renewal certificate will be required at the time of application and recertification. • Minor home repair services for condominiums will include interior work only. • Repair work on a duplex will only be to the interior that is occupied by a HRAP client. All interior and/or exterior work on a duplex will be done only on the part that is occupied by the client. • Services must comply with all Home Owner Associations and/or Mobile Home Park policies. • Repairs are to the housing structure. Repairs are not made to free standing items, like fans, heaters, and lamps. • Intentional damage to a home will not be covered. The exception is in the case of domestic violence. Repairs will be made only if the offender is no longer in the home. • Repairs will not be performed on recreational vehicles. • Homes in violation of City of Renton building codes, fire or municipal codes will not receive services until the code violations are fixed. The Housing Repair Assistance Program may help a homeowner comply with the code(s), if the services required are within the scope of program. 2 HAHUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/1/2003 • Financial assistance will not be given to City of Renton residents of mobile home parks to relocate to other mobile home parks, nor will they be eligible for any service other than emergency repairs once a mobile home park has received written notice of an impending sale. Definitions The program provides services for single family attached/detached dwellings, duplexes, condominiums, modular and manufactured homes only. • A manufactured home (mobile home) is defined as a factory assembled structure, transported in one or more sections, built on a chassis and designed without a permanent foundation. • A modular home is a factory built assembled structure, designed for permanent installation on a foundation. • A single family detached house is a building containing one dwelling unit which is not attached to any other dwelling by any means except fences, has a permanent foundation and is surrounded by open space of yards. • A duplex is a one -family dwelling attached to another one -family dwelling by a common roof, walls or floor. This definition may also include a dwelling unit or units attached to garages or other non-residential uses. • A recreational vehicle is a vehicular type unit primarily designed as temporary living quarters for recreational camping, travel or seasonal use that either has its own power or is mounted on or towed by another vehicle. Recreational vehicles include: camping trailers, fifth -wheel trailers, motor homes, travel trailers and truck campers. Repair Budget Limitations A maximum of $5000 per dwelling will be spent every 10 years. No more than $2000 will be spent in one calendar year. If repairs are completed by the Housing Repair Assistance Program staff, the cost of materials and supplies will be included. If a contractor is used, labor and materials will be included in the cost. Services Provided Safety Install smoke detectors Install carbon monoxide detectors Install, repair/replace security lighting if an existing electrical circuit is available Earthquake preparedness — hot water tank straps Repair/replace exterior doors, windows and stairways if broken Replace broken switches, sockets, and ceiling light fixtures Install locks and deadbolts 3 HAHUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/l/2003 Health Power outage check to see if power can easily be restored Circuit breaker replacement Repair/replace dangerous or non -working electrical circuits Apply non-skid material as needed Replace furnace filters Repair/replace furnace fans Clogged drains Repair furnaces Repair heaters that are not free-standing Repair/replace garbage disposals Rodent control Pest extermination Repair/replace hot water tanks Adaptations for disabilities Install exterior ramps Install/repair/replace special equipment like handrails, grab bars, door knobs, faucet handles Maintenance of basic structure Exterior house painting Repair/replace gutters and downspouts Repair/replace faucets, toilets, sinks, drains, broken or leaking pipes Repair decks only if used as an exit Removal of moss on roof/main structure Install shut-off valves Repair dry rot on the interior/exterior Weather proofing Minor roof leaks; repair/replace soffits, fascia, flashing Minimize water damage - caulking/tub surrounds/leaks Chimney/flashing Energy Efficiency Weatherstripping Insulation Use of Contractors Contractors may be hired for services that need to be addressed immediately if staff is not available, or the repair requires tools, licensing, or expertise not available from staff. Contractors will be required to provide proof of liability insurance and a business license. 4 H:\HUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/1/2003 Repairs Priority for repairs will be determined by the seriousness of the repair relative to other pending repair requests, the hardship to the client if the repair is not completed in a timely manner, the scope of work, date of request, and the income/assets of the household. (The households with the lowest incomes and less than $50,000 in assets will be considered a higher priority than those with low/moderate incomes and more than $50,000 in assets.) The value of a personally owned vehicle or the equity in the house will not be included when calculating household assets. The household will be required to report the income and assets for all members but may exclude the income of a care giver assisting them during an illness. Smoke Detectors and Carbon Monoxide Detectors Staff will install smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors with homeowner. approval. The units will be installed according to manufacturer instructions. The smoke detectors will be located per City of Renton Building Code (UBC 310.9). Carbon monoxide detectors will be installed as recommended by National Fire Protection Association Standards 720, Chapter 2. Referrals Repairs estimated to exceed $2000 will be referred to King County Housing Rehabilitation Office for a deferred home loan application. Some repair projects may be referred to other organizations and agencies. The homeowner will decide whether or not to work with these organizations. The City will not be liable for any referrals. Joint Proiects with Volunteer Groups There may be home repair projects done jointly with volunteer groups. Staff will review all proposed volunteer projects, be responsible for training volunteers and making sure City Volunteer Policies are followed. Materials and technical assistance may be provided when an organization has offered to contribute all or part of the labor. Exterior House Paint Exterior house painting is only offered during the summer months. Priority is given to houses that are peeling or do not have protected surfaces. Houses with fading paint will be a lower priority. The same policies apply to decks, stairways, trim, fascia boards, porches, soffits, and eaves. Houses will only be painted once every ten years. Detached structures will not be painted. 5 HIHUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/l/2003 Access Modifications The Human Services Advisory Committee recognizes there are currently very few resources or agencies providing access modifications for low/moderate income persons with disabilities. Nothing in these policies shall preclude the Housing Repair Assistance Program from providing access modifications to persons who are renting rather than purchasing or owning their dwelling, if they otherwise qualify for the program and it is the judgment of the housing repair staff that such services are not easily obtainable from another agency or program. Access modifications on rental properties require a release from the property owner to perform the modifications. The Housing Repair Assistance Program will review requests for rental access modifications on a case -by - case basis. Repairs and services to rental properties, if approved, will be strictly limited to access modifications for persons with disabilities. Grievance Policy If the applicant believes program eligibility requirements have been met and services have been unfairly denied, applicant must submit a written request for review within 30 days of being notified of the denial. This letter, containing the reasons applicant feels the decision to be in error, shall be addressed to the Human Services Manager who will review the matter and respond with a decision within 10 working days of receipt of applicant's letter. If services are still denied, the applicant may then request a review by the Human Services Advisory Committee. This request must also be in writing and received within 20 working days from the date the review decision was mailed. The Committee will review the issue and make a determination at their next monthly meeting. If the applicant still disagrees with the determination, the Community Services Administrator will review it. The written request for review must be received within 20 working days from the date the Committee's decision was mailed. The decision of the Community Services Administrator will be final. If a client feels that work was not done satisfactorily, the Housing Repair Specialist will assess the work. If a mutually agreed upon solution costs less than the maximum expenditure per house ($2000 annually) the repair will be done. If it costs more, the client will be given information as to how to file a Claim Incident Report for the City of Renton. 6 H:\HUMAN_SE\HRAP\policies\HRAP Policies 2 clean copy.doc4/l/2003 CITY OF RENTON Human Services Division Housing Repair Assistance Program Policies Adopted November 17, 1998 The Housing Repair Assistance Program is actively providing and promoting the repair and maintenance of housing for individuals and families of low and moderate income within the Renton City limits. The program is funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and must conform to CDBG regulations. These regulations provide overall guidelines that must be followed, but are designed to allow agencies greater flexibility in program implementation. Due to the increased demand and limited resources of the Housing Repair Assistance Program, the Human Services Advisory Committee has adopted the following policies to assist staff in implementing this program. Meeting the eligibility requirements listed below does not guarantee services will be provided. In order to maximize the effectiveness of the limited resources available, staff will be responsible for interpreting and applying the policies set forth below and will make the final determination on the provision of services. Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld. This program will not discriminate on the basis of age, race, sex, national origin or religion. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES ® Maintain and repair the housing occupied by individuals and families of moderate, low, and very low-income levels. ® Increase the ability of clients to remain in their own homes. ® Encourage the participation among service providers, the business community, and the citizenship of the City of Renton to support housing maintenance and repair assistance to the local community. ® Assist in providing safe and healthy neighborhoods by maintaining housing and yards in a safe condition. Definitions This program provides services for single family detached houses, condominiums, townhouses, mobile homes, and manufactured homes only. a A mobile home is defined as a factory built structure, constructed prior to 1974, transported in one or more sections, built on a chassis and designed without a permanent foundation. n A manufactured/modular home is a factory built home, designed for permanent installation on a foundation. Repair Budget Limitations The total cost of a repair order shall be $1,000 or less per job for materials and labor. A repair order includes the work requested by the participant and approved by the Housing Specialist. Budget limitation shall also apply if staff hires a contractor to perform the repair services. The City will not share the cost or pay for contracted services if the client hires the contractor. '� Revised 11/17/98 Smoke Detectors The staff may install smoke detectors with the household's. approval. The units will be installed according to the manufacturer's instructions and placed in every bedroom with one in the hallway adjacent to the bedrooms. Referrals All repairs estimated to exceed $1,000 will be referred to King County Housing Rehabilitation Office for a deferred home loan. Some repair projects may be referred to other organizations and agencies. Staff will review all proposed volunteer projects. Materials and technical assistance may be provided when an organization has offered to contribute all or part of the labor. Non -Emergency Repairs Staff may provide non -emergency maintenance and rehabilitation activities in the areas of carpentry, plumbing, masonry, and electrical services if doing so furthers the program objectives. Criteria for Prioritizing Non -Emergency Activities Priority for approved, non -emergency repairs will be determined by utilizing the following matrix. Index for Prioritizing Households Below 30% of Between 31 - Between 51-80% Median Income 50% Median Median Income Income Less than $50,000 in Assets Over $50,000 in Assets Staff will not include the value of a personally owned vehicle or the equity in the dwelling occupied by the participant when calculating the household's assets. The household will be required to report the income and assets for all members, but may exclude the income of a resident staying with a relative to assisted them during an illness. The staff may apply the same policy to short term caregivers living in the dwelling. r, RPVICP(i 11/17/98 Grievance Policy If the applicant believes program qualifications have been met and services have been unfairly denied, applicant must submit a written request for review within 30 days of notification. This letter, containing the reasons applicant feels the decision to be in error, should be addressed to the Human Services Manager who will review the matter and respond with a decision within 10 working days of the receipt of applicant's letter. If services are still denied, the applicant may then request a review by the Human Services Advisory Committee. This request must also be in writing and received within 20 working days from the date the review decision was mailed. The Committee will review the issue and make a determination at their next monthly meeting. Should applicant still disagree with that determination, the Community Services Administrator will review it. The written request for review must be received within 20 working days from the date the Committee's decision was mailed. The decision of the Community Services Administrator will be final. 2003 INCOME GUIDELINES Persons Per Household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moderate Income $39,550 $45,200 $50,850 $56,500 $61,000 $65,550 $70,050 $74,600 (below 80% of median) Low Income $27,250 $31,150 $35,050 $38,950 $42,050 $45,200 $48,300 $51,400 (below 50% of median) Extremely Low $16,350 $18,700 $21,050 $23,350 $25,250 $27,100 $29,000 $30,850 Income (below 30% of median) CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems/Technical Services Aril 7, 2003 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Karen McFarland x7209 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Street Vacation Petition, VAC-03-001; Portion of alley Correspondence.. running north/south between Whitworth and Morris Ordinance ............. Avenues South and South 3rd and 4th Streets Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue paper Study Sessions...... Information........ . Recommended Action: Council Concur Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: A petition has been submitted by Gregg McNabb on behalf of St. Anthony's Parish requesting the vacation of a portion of alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3rd and 4th Streets. A public hearing was held March 24, 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the request to vacate the alley portion subject to the following conditions: • The petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof that outside utilities have received and are satisfied with any easements, which are necessary to protect their facilities in the requested vacation area. • A utility easement for the City shall be retained over the entire alley being vacated. • This vacation shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the St. Anthony's Parish Development Agreement. (Resolution #3623) \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\Fi1e Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-25 - Street Vacations From 1990 and Forward\003 8\agbi110403.doc\KLM\tb CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 25, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: . 'Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, A ministrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department STAFF CONTACT: Karen McFarland x7209 SUBJECT: STREET VACATION PETITION, VAC 03-001; PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND MORRIS AVENUES SOUTH AND SOUTH 3`d and 41' STREETS T�ST1F.� A petition has been submitted by Gregg McNabb on behalf of St. Anthony's Parish requesting the vacation of a portion of alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3`d and 4th Streets. The requested vacation area is shown on the accompanying map exhibit. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the request to vacate the alleyway portion subject to the following conditions: The petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof that outside utilities have received and are satisfied with any easements, which are necessary to protect their facilities in the requested vacation area. • A utility easement for the City shall be retained over the entire alley being vacated. This vacation shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the St. Anthony's Parish Development Agreement. (Resolution #3623) H:\File Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-25 - Street Vacations From 1990 and Forward\003 8\StAnthony2003\ip_03001.DOC\KLM\tb March 25, 2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: A vacation petition was received January 17, 2003, from Gregg McNabb on behalf of St. Anthony's Parish. City Code requires that more than two-thirds (2/3) of the owners whose property abuts the alley to be vacated must sign the petition. One -hundred percent (100%) of the abutting property owners have signed this petition. The portion of right-of-way included in this petition was dedicated in the plat of Smithers 4"' Addition to the Town of Renton on October 24, 1903. Thus, no City funds were spent to acquire this right-of-way. A related vacation, VAC-00-003, was already approved by the City Council on July 15, 2002. As shown on the attached map, VAC-00-003 will vacate a portion of Whitworth Avenue South and a 160' portion of the alley between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3rd and 4th Streets. The current petition, VAC-03-001, proposes to vacate an additional 120' of the 16 foot alley between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3rd and 4th Streets. According to the Transportation Department, the requested vacation will have "no effect on traffic patterns or pedestrian facilities." Public facilities within this alleyway include an 8-inch sewer main. Through the requested vacation, St. Anthony's plans to "create a unified campus ... with sufficient parking to serve parish functions and [to] diminish the parish's impact on the surrounding neighborhood." The petitioner contends that the benefits of the proposed vacation are as follows: • the parish will be able to better consolidate parking • the parish will be able to better maintain internal security within the campus • the public will have less confusion regarding the location of parish property • the City will no longer have liability and maintenance costs for property virtually surrounded by a single property owner RESEARCH/SURVEY: The current proposed street vacation request was circulated to various City departments and outside agencies for comments. March 25, 2003 Page 3 Internal Review The following City departments had no objection to the proposed alley vacation: • PBPW Department/Transportation Division • PBPW Department/ Surface Water Utility • PBPW Department/ Water Utility • PBPW Department/ Wastewater Utility • PBPW Department/ Maintenance Division • EDNSP Department • PBPW Department/ Development Services • Community Services Department • Fire Department/ Fire Prevention • Police Department From the internal review the following comments were received: • The Wastewater Utility requested that the City retain an easement for utilities over the entire alleyway if the vacation is approved. • The Surface Water Utility states that the requested vacation "does not pose a drainage problem as long as the sheet flow path is not obstructed." • The Development Services Division states that the requested vacation is consistent with the approved conditional use permit (LUA02-054) and the development agreement (LUA03-005). Outside Agency Review The following outside agencies were contacted about the proposed vacation: • Puget Sound Energy • QWEST • A T & T Cable/ Comcast • Electric Lightwave The status of the outside agency reviews are as follows: • Electric Lightwave does not need an easement. • QWEST confirms the existence of facilities in the right-of-way and requests that the City take no action until easements are obtained to continue to service these facilities. • Puget Sound Energy is still in the process of determining whether an easement is required. • To date, A T & T Cable/Comcast has shown no interest in the proposed vacation. March 25, 2003 Page 4 CONCLUSION: A survey of various City departments and outside agencies was conducted by staff. No objections were raised to the requested alley vacation. Thus, staff recommends vacating the requested portion of the alley running north -south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3rd and 4th Streets, subject to the previously mentioned conditions. An easement must be retained by the City of Renton over the entire vacated area. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-03-001 A portion of the alley located in Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume I I of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot l 1 of said plat; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 9 of said plat; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the northerly boundary line of said Lot 9, a distance of 16 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 22 of said plat; Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the southwest corner of Lot 20 of said plat; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the southerly boundary line of said Lot 20, a distance of 16 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Exhibit B Map Exhibit Street Vacation VAC-03-001 St. Anthony's Alley Vacation C/3 S 3rd St LT Q 0 E�: CO Nel U Q U3 L L O v J S 4th St iY Technical Scrviccs . ®. Nar.i. BvM.g/Pnbfi< w«►m IL McFzI 27 l--y 2003 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Staff Contact...... James P. Wilhoit, x 7319 Subject: Temporary Full Road Closures for Railroad Crossing Upgrades Exhibits: Issue Paper Resolution Vicinity Map Transportation Committee Report of July 15, 2002 Al #: For Agenda of: Agenda Status: Consent .............. Public Hearing...... Correspondence.... Ordinance........... Resolution ........... Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Other ................ Interlocal 0 Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept.......... X Council Concur Finance Dept.....:. X Other ............. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required..... $337,610 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted......... $337,610 Revenue Generated.......... $337,610 Summary of Action: 7, 2003 Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) has been authorized to replace two existing railroad crossings in Renton with new rails and concrete panels, in conjunction with installation of traffic and railroad grade crossing signals. The railroad crossings are at Southport Blvd. (south access to Coulon Park) and Lake Washington Blvd. To minimize disruption to park activities the two closures will be restricted to Tuesday through Thursday only. Each crossing will serve as a detour while the closure is in effect on the other. Therefore, both roads will not be closed at the same time. The railroad will need temporary full road closures to complete this work that will take place on three days between May 1 and May 29, 2003. The City's Traffic Operations group has prepared a traffic control plan with required signage, and two week's public notice will be provided. Staff Recommendations: The Transportation Division staff recommends that Council concur with the three (3) total days of closures for replacement of existing railroad grade crossings by BNSF and adopt the resolution authorizing the temporary closures. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda_2003\Southport RR Crossing Closure.DOCSouthport RR Crossing Closure CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 24, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the City of Renton Council VIA: jE� Jesse Tanner, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermaf , Administrator STAFF CONTACT: James P. Wilhoit, x7319 SUBJECT: Temporary Full Road Closures for Railroad Crossing Upgrades ISSUE: Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad will be improving the two' existing railroad grade crossings near the south access to Coulon Park. A road closure resolution will be needed for three total days in order to complete the work. RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize three (3) days of temporary full road closures for railroad grade crossing work at Southport Blvd. (south access to Coulon Park) and Lake Washington Blvd. to take place during the period from May 1 to May 29, 2003. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton has entered into agreements with The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) for BNSF to make improvements to railroad grade crossings at two locations in the vicinity of the south access to Coulon Park. The railroad anticipates that the more difficult crossing on Lake Washington Blvd. can be completed in one day, but requests a two-day full road closure for this crossing project in case it is needed. One day is sufficient for the Southport Blvd. crossing. The total of three (3) days of closures requested are summarized as follows: 1-Day Southport Blvd. (south access to Coulon Park), CAG 02-135 2 Days Lake Washington Blvd., CAG 02-136 H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda-2003\RRsprilSSue.DOC March 24, 2003 Page 2 Specific dates for these closures are not known at this time, but, based on consultation with the Parks Division, they will be restricted to Tuesday through Thursday, with no Monday, Friday or weekend closure allowed to minimize disruption to park activities. Each crossing will serve as a detour while the closure is in effect on the other therefore, the closure of both roads will not be allowed at the same time. Transportation will provide traffic control, coordinate with BNSF to get ample notification, and will forward specific dates as soon as they are established. Public notification through the Renton Reporter, South County Journal and the City Source will be part of the process. Additionally, informational flyers will be mailed to area residents and businesses, as was done prior to similar railroad crossing work in September 2002. All notification will be done two weeks prior to construction. FUNDING: Approximately $180,000 is authorized through TIP #35 with the remaining funding being contributed by the developer. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. AT SOUTHPORT BLVD., AND OF SOUTHPORT BLVD., FOR A PERIOD OF THREE DAYS (CONSECUTIVE OR NON- CONSECUTIVE) BETWEEN MAY 1 AND MAY 29, 2003, FOR BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS AT BOTH LOCATIONS. WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company (BNSF) has entered into agreements with the City of Renton to replace deteriorated railroad grade crossings at six locations in the City; and WHEREAS, to facilitate this construction and allow for a safe condition for both vehicles and pedestrians it is necessary to do this work under temporary street closures; and WHEREAS, BNSF has requested a two-day full road closure of the Lake Washington Blvd. crossing, and a one -day full road closure of the Southport Blvd. crossing (south entrance to Southport (SECO) Development and Gene Coulon Park); and WHEREAS, these temporary full road closures will take place between May 1 and May 29, 2003; and WHEREAS, these temporary street closures will not occur concurrently; and WHEREAS, there will be no Monday, Friday or weekend street closures allowed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code section 9-9-3 the City Council is to authorize such closures by means of a Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The City Council does hereby authorize the temporary closure of Lake Washington Blvd. at Southport Blvd., and of Southport Blvd., for a period of three days (consecutive or non-consecutive) between May 1 and May 29, 2003, to be extended upon weather contingencies, for the BNSF project upgrading City railroad crossings. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.971:3/19/03:ma 2 Jesse Tanner, Mayor CITY OF • DEPARTM ENT OF WORKS • - - q � � a� � G. .` � � � �� fir � : � � z � t .._, It *tm SF' COULON ESTATES VFW WIL _ y-}6.t�,`�,. S ..`-v. 1. . 'Sam- '„r ♦ � -�' % _ � � �� s.. j .,: s � f �d v k �, _ t b yY - r' x'" � Yi. 1 � �• '3 � f1 ;. �\~ S .c+ �S �. , � �i ♦ �•j.7 §'. 4�' � {C� F � � t , '� �i - 1 PINNACLE APART eE V {` GE E COULON - , PARK T"I ""'f S+: %Yl'' Y d"t �' 1 c Y ♦� . ,, x' � � �.� y,4• .'-i . . ni + a �"� i , . ;,, �, r :. 1 r''1't!{71 .,.� . }: ,wr„ y"3 : i• F- -i, d', Y.'' +. ✓,w'y. '> �} t e.. x �ytt - ;+y„y,.' .',',3�4 's + � � *' �`'t' .r��-d':�e�",�5':dk9�8,'y'. {igj a. '70 WORK 4,1,1 1''}�. pig Mf4 Y�"s .,,��`i fie �. ��� � � "'• � -- ��'M ��. '�� ��\ }a,�yir�d`�- '. �- ^� ��,.+{ s-,.-r"""^; i e�(�,'�4 `�h. '� Y�� S1F.� ��.�s� �La 5 n _ ��ld'b^, $�"' t � I �i°�'j"V�."d„*'� - K, a�r`v- .s °� • �� n .A-�� ..1t r r'•, � ,r � $y "s �.. � ..�c ,��.� r `� �,�:., ; w yrt >�,a. ... � o do � i 1.44• i _ fi# or' i ,tt'�;9�1 f� f'f x,� 3. s +�+1 „.'�s' A s,�gti? '1�; a . �L Y i,�,es �•�.s °a�"t `.S'�° 4h' t�ri �,��,�.��� � J°' �9 t y 5•,y' � �°'.r� 1� �` F ,f"`a �P f ♦'•, Xr+`s^'W` f s - t s O\ f- r, , t Al - 1 i AV y`d .. t � -LEGEND: A COULON ESTATESi' i © € ENTRANCE d F, 1T B TYPE 111.E J v4 y� �\�. � ,'--��--^ •,. + f, 't` :4 �-r�. - is '� 10 Ar FYPE IA ` c _ 3AA N ''Y�' Viz. t.� _ �''` •@��LL .i`� '� n '�i �'"$'' ' - + "X' .'' ! ' +u- � ,PINNACLE ENTRANC GEE COULON', '* 1i �. PARK } sue` VA A x •C"w .t- y r a ' a a' nt � x T . --" '* .G>•` ' b, q y w " '� x r.'�' s r, T ! �� '. C WORK:AREA q'�`try qP. • `3s' ;5'"�..">..:,,"'t'LL;�iyt� T-""i3 2 €i ` 4 ti e; s ' +.�.3 �. - •2. x. ` z y3.' h pr. pt, a sly t c I Wall- -ppzrmE lit Lt� @ 'p"o !* 4� � ¢ ''�� 3 _�.rk u. �d • x S'W 1� f' S, r"- ; :v, tr � r . � I w 1d ` -!: - ?� ti �� � Y�s�Q e'.:' kik G{�Y. �"�S'a `t y�A�. a ♦a4• �'�,., dtP ® #h�: �i,', i -� tr� ` x a Y i a�,t;'�` ' ' t '4 r t "'t5' ^ X y�`�'�' A 84``„ ' 4 s t _ �, i, t• ' `•: :'�-..• , �,; . y ' i` 4, riahra tir'.t;� s r A '<,� `>.: �♦' �L. t�.aw ,y� �yY" ,��"� �+t �g `-�tt,•� _� �,+C`0 �.�'��."^ �'- fl� yr .� � � A. __. �,'+ WO-539 . T'w - - . - r-..� -_tr,r c �. _ 4 r,� � •�1: �' �1 fit. OWF- 1-74 00, LEGEND ••� • :p� __ �'� � � •� �' iY�EJii-B F' I� t -'" '_ '� �. • � _ s 4' a .fir.. �.`. - ! S�- ,�. A JALXa Ylv tt yq'dk yy}tt IRE '..✓j ©��S��i®_ �.i \'v� � � t � ��€t�� ��, tPS t I�_ P � ��,` GENE COULON { • • a PARK t y:' �'v � .F. --t� -: _ . 1 , 4 � � ". ® ®: �" . ♦ •ti ,} - .. a. Y i2• "� � � � c. 4! ���4a -E i ,� ;�� 5: t l N �,tTi ...fir *' r ; `` l�l7C.� .P. r> p'5-mot= x. .rr �i; —,,.a v ""''ar'',, • • F r aF+¢ i.-•;-• WORK,AREA, � � e ''F�° a'`�r�#� ♦ � �. s .t r i t' ar-`.,,•..< ti � r.1,� '<y �; ,�. # '�s'' ��• f . ! F. Y��3`':. � +�„�y `: s P,1`�„r, P l,�µ� _�^�+�t�y � �{ �, :,e J„� k. :39<���`"'a t �. r7i. � ,.-•"`°•:.✓""o .�..' � �'i 2�"'4 �£ f'� r , a. �� �sb 4 *v 3 a� t' : t �, 1 � �� , • s , Y !"`' F i, � �'v zZ Z�e1� ��P,� x�k,�� r ',� Q� / rJ � •tti TW 4it K'Y - *'ia'}#''a +' a1 '` s,� u,,3J'.+ T . wF j S �r'1�' Y, a •�'& TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT July 15, 2002 Project: Southport Boulevard Railroad Crossing Improvements and Lake Washington Boulevard Railroad Crossing Improvements (July 08, 2002) Ci 6 1l Cc.✓ iti'CJcL Date � 1 S ®Z The City of Renton has negotiated with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) two separate agreements to replace and improve the railroad crossings over Southport Boulevard and over Lake Washington Boulevard. This work is required to accommodate the new Southport development and will include installation of shoulder mounted cantilevers, signal, and gates on Southport Boulevard. The developer, Southport LLC, will pay for�this'work, which is expected to cost $337,610.00. $209,937.24 has already been deposited with the City, of Renton, and any remaining funds required will be deposited at a later dater The Transportation Committee recommends that Couneil,.author..ize'the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreements between the City of Renton and Bt"irington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. s et rFFtt Don Persson_ Chair cc: K y Keolker-Wheeler, Member Connie Brundage Leslie Lahndt James Wilhoit Jan Illian H:Trans/admin/commitreport/2002lSouthport RR agreements Transportation Division 2003 Reallocation Summary TIP 32 33 34 35 36 3� 38 39 ao 41 42 43 and Eg so _ 51 52 53 54 Project Title Trans Concurrency Missing Links Program Pdrk-Sunset Corridor RR Crossing Safety Pro . Interagency Signal Coord. Environmental Monitoring Bicycle Route Dev. Program Rainier Av-SR 167 to S 2nd St NE3rd / NE 4th Corridor CBD Bike & Ped. Connections Lind Av-SW 16th - SW 43rd SW 7th St./Lind Ave SW S / S 31 st St onnections to West ale Ave SW Extension enton Project St - Union to Duvall ds Assessment NE 4th St/Ho uiam Av NE Sunset/I-405 Interchan e Trans Valle ITS Grad W A roach at Rainier Av Houser W S - Main to Burnett Ad'ust to bud et rounding 2003 TIP Budget $ 40,000 $ 30,000 $ 5 000 $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 105,000 $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 75,000 $ 105,000 $ 5,000 $ 26,000 $ 140 000 $ 305,000 $ - $ 175,000 $ 7,500 $ 10 000 $ 400,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ 620,000 $ $ 127 Change -3 700 170 000 45,000 210000 , -80 000 -5,000 243 700 10 000 -305 000 -362 800 20 000 -127 New Allocation $ 36,300 $ 30,000 $ 5,000 $ 180,000 $ 8,000 $ 150,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 ; ! $ 269,700 I $ 150 000 I $ - $ $ 175 000 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 37,200 [ $ 60,000 P $ 50,000 $ 620,00 0 $_ T.W N je 1 Costs rc.es. ...... <: ; $ 6-:6.6 ;::.:;::.:.:,:.::.:..:.:.::.:..::..:...:...... . 2/14103 Comment Cost estimate lower. Vot expended in 2002. Railroad determined 2003 schedule 4ot expended in 2002. -or comprehensive corridor 'Mailer work program antic! Jo work expected. Jot expended in 2002. dot expended in 2002. King Loney spent in 2002. )esign only In 2003. lot expended in 2002. Mod contract award. d in 2003. is lead. work needed for North Renton land use scenarios. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2003 - 2008 SIX -YEAR TIP Railroad Crossing Safety Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12166 RANK: 35 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425-430-7220 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Install railroad crossing upgrade improvements at locations determined to warrant safety Received $180,000 Railroad Crossing Safety Program grant for Lake Washington improvements. Depending on the needs of the location, work could include rubber crossing Boulevard at the entrance to Gene Coulon Park. Budget $170,700 match money pads, lighted or unlighted signing, motion detectors, gates and connections to traffic signals to for concrete crossing upgrades on Bronson/Houser mainline, SW 7th Street, provide signal pre-emption. Lind Avenue SW spurs, and Mill Avenue. JUSTIFICATION: Railroad roadway crossings can present a serious safety concern that needs to be addressed when conditions warrant improvements. .,J,— ,. ._ Nrogra ITEM Programmed spent In 201 Project Develo ment Precon En /Admin 28,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 170,700 Construction En !Admin 4,000 Other Lake Wash. Xing) 180,000 FUTAL EXPENSEs 382,700 3 SOURCEZF FUNDS: 1 /2 Cent as Tax Business License Fee 126,700 3 Vehicle License Fee Grants In -Hand 180.000 Mitigation In -Hand 76,000 L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand BNSF Grants Pro osed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Pro osed Other Pro osed Undetermined TOTAL SO RCES 382,700 3, CHANGES: Added $31,700 in 2002 to Concrete Railroad Crossings project as approved by Council. $198,657 is expected in contribution from BNSF to the Concrete Crossing Project, but is not shown because the total project cost reflects the City's portion only. i lluncieci : Six Year Proc 04 1 2005 RR X" 5 - 35 FINAL mJOW00i rri PAl ap CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division Staff Contact...... Karl Hamilton, x-7220 Subject: DWI Memorial Sign Exhibits: Issue Paper Existing Sign Recommended Action: Council Concur Al #: For Agenda of: 7, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . X Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required. -0- Paid by Citizen Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted. N/A Revenue Generated......... Account # City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Peggy Wipf called on March 14, 2003, requesting a DWI memorial sign on Rainier Avenue South south of South 4`' Place in memory of her deceased son, Jason J. Wipf. On October 29, 1999 Jason was a passenger in a car where the driver lost control of the vehicle and skidded into a concrete abutment. Mr. Wifp was taken to Harborview Hospital where he later died while the driver was treated and released with suspicion of intoxication. Peggy Wipf informed City staff that she would be willing to cover the cost of the sign and installation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In the interest of public service and awareness staff recommends that a DWI memorial sign be installed on the east side of Rainier Avenue South south of the railroad tracks. H:Shared/Division/Transportation/admin/agenda2003/Rainier Avenue DWI Sign CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermaf , %dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Karl Hamilton, x-7220 SUBJECT: Don't Drink and Drive Memorial Sign ISSUE: Peggy Wipf, 30655 Kanasket-Kangley Road, Ravensdale, WA 98051 called on March 14, 2003 requesting a DWI memorial sign on Rainier Avenue South, south of South 41h Place in memory of Jason J. Wipf, deceased loved one. RECOMMENDATION: Install a DWI memorial sign on Rainier Avenue South just south of the railroad overpass. The sign should be similar to the one on Benson Road South, south of South 271h Street. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton has a DWI memorial sign within its jurisdiction. It is located on the west side of Benson Road South, south of South 27th Street (see attached picture). The requesting party pays for the sign installation and material costs. According to City of Renton Police Traffic Collision Report, Case #99-9368, on October 29, 1999, at 1:03 a.m., a vehicle driven by Michael Florez was northbound on Rainier Avenue South in the outside lane. A witness estimated the vehicle speed at 70 mph. The same witness stated that the driver lost control of the vehicle, skidded sideways across the northbound lane, and crashed into the cement support of the railroad tracks in the 500 block of Rainier Avenue South. The passenger, Jason J. Wipf, died at Harborview Hospital while the driver was treated and released after a blood vile was collected due to suspicion of intoxication. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division Staff Contact...... David Christensen X-7212 Subject: Approval of Consultant Contract with HDR Engineering for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II Project Exhibits: Issue paper Scope, Schedule, and Budget for Contract Recommended Action: Council Concur AI a: For Agenda of: April 7, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . X Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $194,600 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $200,000 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $2,300,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Wastewater Utility Section, as part of its 2003 approved Capital Improvement Program, is working on pre -design efforts for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II Project. Because of the size of the scope for this project, the Wastewater Utility is recommending that HDR Engineering be retained to complete the initial pre -design effort. Once this effort is complete, staff will determine whether to continue the final design in-house or to further amend this contract to utilize HDR Engineering through the final, design process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Contract with HDR Engineering in the amount of $194,000 for pre -design services for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II project. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\File Sys\W WP - WasteWater\W WP-03-0000 Correspondance - Wastewater\davec\Sunset_Int II_AB.doc\DMC:lf CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: j Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg ZimmermarT,Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Dave Christensen, x-7212 SUBJECT: Approval of Consultant Contract with HDR Engineering for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II Project ISSUE: The Wastewater Utility Section, as part of its 2003 approved Capital Improvement Program, is working on pre -design efforts for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II Project. Because of the size of the scope for this project, the Wastewater Utility is recommending that HDR Engineering be retained to complete the initial pre -design effort. Once this effort is complete, staff will determine whether to continue the final design in-house or to further amend this contract to utilize HDR Engineering through the final design process. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Contract with HDR Engineering in the amount of $194,000 for pre -design services for the Sunset Interceptor Phase II project. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Sunset Interceptor Phase II project was placed into the 2003 Capital Improvement Program due to the need to ensure sufficient capacity in our Sunset Corridor service area. This includes the needs identified for the redevelopment efforts associated with the Highlands Redevelopment. This project consists of the installation of approximately 7,000 linear feet of 18-inch and 24-inch sewer mains along both NE Sunset Blvd. and Sunset Blvd NE from Harrington Avenue NE to N. 4'' Street. March 20, 2003 Page 2 The work program for the Wastewater Utility is very full this year with the other replacement and new sewer installation projects we have programmed. As such, we are recommending that this effort be performed by consultant rather than by in-house staff. The predesign effort for this year was planned and budgeted anticipating that a consultant would be used for this work and sufficient funds are contained within the Wastewater line item for Sanitary Sewer Main Extensions for this contract. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\FHe Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondance - Wastewater\davec\Sunset Int II Issue.doc\DMC:lf Exhibit A Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study This project consists of performing a study and up to approximately 30 percent Preliminary Design for one (1) alternative gravity sewer route: 1) Sunset Boulevard NE. Final Design, Bidding Assistance, and Construction Services are not part of this Scope of Work, but may be added as part of a later Amendment. Task 100 - Project Management Objective: This task tracks project management, project coordination, and accounting throughout the duration of the project. I. Responsibilities of HDR: A. Contracting and internal project controlling and accounting. B. Staff administration and scheduling. C. Preparing and submitting Monthly Invoices (list of project staff that charged to the project; hourly rates; number of hours charged; and Other Direct Charges (ODC's)). D. Preparing and submitting Monthly Progress Reports (describing work completed, upcoming work to be completed, and scope, schedule, and budget issues). H. Responsibilities of City: A. Review invoice format and identify required backup information. III. Assumptions: A. Backup information (e.g. timesheets; logs; receipts; etc.) will be submitted as requested by the City. IV. Task Deliverables: A. Project Guide. B. Monthly Invoice. C. Monthly Progress Report. City of Renton A-1 Exhibit A - Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study February 27, 2003 Task 200 - Surveying Objective: This task provides the services of a surveyor (subconsultant) to perform surveying work necessary to establish gravity sewer alignment and grade. 1. Responsibilities of Surveyor: A. Research and confirm primary control points. B. Provide field survey and base maps for development of 30 Percent Preliminary Plan and Profile drawings. C. Establish horizontal and vertical control points along routes. D. Providing Traffic Control. ll. Responsibilities of City: A. III. Assumptions: A. Mapping begins one hundred (100) feet east of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard NE and Harrington Avenue and runs west along Sunset Boulevard NE to the intersection with Edmonds Avenue NE (approximately 1800 feet). The route then continues south on Sunset Boulevard NE to the intersection with N 41h Street, then west on N 41h Street to the intersection with Meadow Avenue N (approximately 7100 feet). B. Mapping area limit is full Right -of -Way widths or to any fences and will extend an additional fifty (50) feet in both directions at all intersecting Right - of -Ways. C. Mapping area limit will extend an additional fifty (50) feet in both directions at all intersecting Right -of -Ways (an additional 1,900 feet). D. Primary control points to be on City of Renton datum. E. Mapping will show Right -of -Way and lot lines, 2-foot contours, all existing utilities below ground, and all surface features. Adjoining properties will be identified by the King County Tax ID Number and Owners name as available from the County's GIS. Geotechnical features and test sites borings will be located on the mapping as appropriate. F. Horizontal and vertical control points established at approximate 500-foot intervals. G. Mapping will be in AutoCAD 2000 format using layers approved by the City of Renton. Scale will be one to one. Text will be parallel to the alignment. IV. Task Deliverables: A. Base maps for development of 30 Percent Preliminary Plan and Profile drawings. City of Renton A-2 Exhibit A - Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study February 27, 2003 Task 300 - Geotechnical Objective: This task provides the services of a geotechnical engineer (subconsultant) to perform subsurface explorations necessary to assess the feasibility of construction methods. L Responsibilities of Geotechnical Engineer. A. Perform field exploration to characterize subsurface conditions using borings (direct sampling of subsurface soils and observation of groundwater information) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) (supplement boring information and assist in stratigraphic interpretation between boring locations). B. Providing Traffic Control. C. Make necessary underground utility locates. D. Obtain Street Use Permit. II. Responsibilities of City: A. Obtain any required Right -of -Entry Agreements. B. Review Draft Geotechnical Report. III. Assumptions: A. Area of work similar to Item III.A. above under Task 200 - Surveying. B. Borings to be spaced at approximately 500-foot intervals and twenty (20) feet below existing ground surface. Borings will be advanced with truck mounted hollow stem auger drilling equipment and logged and sampled. C. Half of the borings will have standpipe piezometers to monitor groundwater levels. D. Lane closures are required with Traffic Control. E. Depth of penetration of GPR through the granular outwash sediments should be on the order of twenty (20) feet. In finer grain deposits such as silt and clay, the penetration depth of the radar signal will likely be reduced and not provide the same quality data as the more granular soils. F. Laboratory testing will include grain size analysis on selected samples. If cobbles or boulders are encountered, rock hardness/compressive strength testing (not part of this Scope) is recommended in order to provide useful information. G. Geotechnical Report to summarize site plan showing boring locations, interpreted cross section, boring logs, results of selected laboratory testing, and a discussion of the various geologic conditions, geotechnical attributes, and construction considerations. H. Boring production rate of three (3) completed 20-foot deep borings per shift. City of Renton A-3 Exhibit A - Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study February 27, 2003 IV. Task Deliverables: A. Three (3) copies each of the Draft and Final Geotechnical Report. Task 400 - Preliminary Design Objective: This task will provide a Study that addresses different issues for the route. As part of the Study, 30 percent preliminary Plan and Profile drawings will be provided. Some of the work can be performed immediately, but most of the work will be based upon information obtained from Tasks 200 and 300. L Responsibilities of HDR: A. Conduct field reconnaissance: i. Take photographs along routes. ii. Review Zoning Maps to determine land uses along routes. B. Size gravity sewers. C. Prepare Draft Study. The following is an anticipated Study Table of Contents: Section I Introduction Section 2 Route Issues • Utilities • Geotechnical • Land Use • Construction Methods • Constructability • Costs Section 3 30 Percent Preliminary Plan and Profile Drawings D. Conduct Draft Study Review Meeting. Take and distribute Meeting Minutes. E. Incorporate appropriate comments and prepare Final Study. II. Responsibilities of City: A. Provide access to Zoning Maps. B. Provide flow data necessary to size gravity sewers. C. Provide City drafting standards. D. Review Draft Study. E. Attend Draft Study Review Meeting. III. Assumptions: City of Renton A-4 Exhibit A - Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study February 27, 2003 IV. A. No more than twenty-five (25) photographs will be required. B. Sixteen (16) 30 Percent Preliminary Plan and Profile Drawings. Scale will be 1"=20' (horizontal) and 1"=5' or 1"=10' (vertical). C. Only half-size drawings will be required. D. Drafting will be in AutoCAD 2002 format using layers approved by the City of Renton. E. Draft Study Review Meeting will be a maximum 8 hours in duration. F. Permitting and Traffic Impacts are not included. If required, Permitting and/or Traffic Impacts will be completed during Final Design. Task Deliverables: A. Five (5) copies each of the Draft and Final Study. B. Draft Study Review Meeting Minutes. Task 500 - Final Design The extent of and budget for these services, to be provided to the City by HDR, will be determined as part of a later contract Amendment. Costs for these services are not included in Exhibit C - Cost Estimate. Task 600 - Bidding Assistance The extent of and budget for these services, to be provided to the City by HDR, will be determined as part of a later contract Amendment. Costs for these services are not included in Exhibit C - Cost Estimate. Task 700 - Construction Services The extent of and budget for these services, to be provided to the City by HDR, will be determined as part of a later contract Amendment. Costs for these services are not included in Exhibit C - Cost Estimate. City of Renton A-5 Exhibit A - Scope of Work Sunset Interceptor A lignment Study February 27, 2003 Exhibit B Time Schedule of Completion Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study HDR will begin work on this project as soon as authorized. The following schedule has been estimate for each Task: Anticipated Notice to Proceed Task 200 - Surveying Task 300 - Geotechnical Task 400 - Preliminary Design Submit Draft Study Draft Study Review Meeting Submit Final Study March 31, 2003 June 27, 2003 June 27, 2003 September 22, 2003 October 13, 2003 October 31, 2003 This schedule estimate assumes that information will be provided to HDR as it is needed. City of Renton B-I Exhibit B - Time Schedule of Completion Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study February 27, 2003 EXHIBIT C COST ESTIMATE Renton/Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study 10 Piazza/Da ta_Center/Forms/City/Contracts /2000_Consultant.doc bh DIRECT SALARY COST: Personnel Rudy Vigilia Eric Bergstrom Allison Ratliff Mike Blanchette Grady Stephens Staff Engineer Leif Larson Bonnie Lindner Steve Gundy Gail Pfeiffer Stacy Macke Karen Baker COST PLUS NET FEE DETERMINATION Hourly Rates of Pay Project Manager $46 Principal $45 Project Engineer $41 Sr.Engineer (QA/QC) $47 Structural Engineer $47 Engineer $26 Traffic Engineer $39 Permitting Specialist $36 Drafting $27 Project Controller $26 Wordprocessing $20 Documents Manager $17 Net Fee 15 % of direct salary cost plus overhead DIRECT NON -SALARY COST: Travel and Per Diem: Cars at $0.36/mile (2003 IRS Rate) Per Diem @ cost Office and Equipment: Delivery / Postage @ cost Computer Disk $0.33 each Compact Disk $1.25 each Zip Disk $10.00 each Film $4.00/roll Mapping/Photos. Survey @ cost Supply @ cost Computer Usage: Engineering $10.00/hour CADD $15.00/hour Plotting: Paper (Other Sizes Available) 24X36 $7.00/plot 12X 18 $3.00/plot 11X17 $0.50/plot (laser printer) Vellum (Other Sizes Available) 24X36 $11.00/plot 12X18 $ 4.00/plot Mylar (Other Sizes Available) 24X36 $16.00/plot 12X18 $ 6.00/plot Renton/Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study 11 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts /2000_Consultant.doc bh EXHIBIT C (cont.) Reproduction: Outside Reproduction @ cost Inhouse Reproduction: Xerox Color Copies Transparency OCE Plots Communications: Long Distance @ cost FAX $0.75 per page $0.10 per copy 1-1000 $0.07 per copy 1001-2500 $0.05 per copy 2501-5000 $0.04 per copy 5001-Up $1.00 per copy $1.05 each / color included $0.25 per square foot Renton/Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study 12 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts /2000_Consultant.doc bh EXHIBIT C (cont.) SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST (See EXHIBIT C1) ProfitSharing........................................................................................................... % FICA........................................................................................................................ % Unemployment Compensation................................................................................. % Medical Aid and Industrial Insurance...................................................................... % Company Insurance and Medical............................................................................ % Vacation, Holiday and Sick Leave.......................................................................... % State B & O Tax & Other Business Tax.................................................................. % Insurance.................................................................................................................. Administration and Time Unassignable.................................................................. % Printing, Stationery and Supplies............................................................................ % Travel Not Assignable............................................................................................. % Telephone and Telegraph Not Assignable............................................................... % Fees, Dues, Professional Meetings.......................................................................... % Utilities and Maintenance........................................................................................ % Rent......................................................................................................................... % RentalEquipment.................................................................................................... Office Miscellaneous, Postage................................................................................ Professional Services............................................................................................... % TOTAL 176.75 % SUMMARY OF COSTS Project No. Name of Project: Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study and 30% Preliminary Design DirectSalary Cost.................................................................................................................... $ 22,342 Overhead Cost (including payroll additives)............................................176.75 % $ 39,488 Sub -Total $ 61,830 NetFee.............................................................................................................15 % $ 9,275 SubFee........................................................................................................... 5 % $ 5,495 Sub Total $ 14,770 Direct Non -Salary Costs: a. Travel and per diem ............................................... $ 100 b. Reproduction expenses .......................................... $ 1,450 c. Computer expense .................................................. $ 4,450 d. Telephone/Fax....................................................... $ 950 e. Postage/Express Mail ............................................. $ 950 f. Outside consultants ................................................ $ 109,900 g. Other(Misc)........................................................... $ 200 Total $ 118,000 Sub Total $ 118,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 194,600 Renton/Sunset Interceptor Alignment Study 13 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts /2000_Consultant.doc bh EXHIBIT C1 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS AND GENERAL OVERHEAD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Direct Labor Fringe Benefits: Actual Unallowable Allowable S 75,523,512 S - $ 75,523,512 Vacation 6,648,259 - 6,648,259 Holiday 3,936,683 - 3,936,683 Sick leave 1,911,455 - 1,911,455 Payroll taxes 9,609,892 - 9,609,892 Group insurance 6,927,977 - 6,927,977 Retirement benefits 6,502,102 (2,129,149) 4,372,953 Total Fringe Benefits 35,536,368 (2,129,149) 33,407,219 General Overhead: Indirect labor. General 29,637,636 (90,114) 29,547,522 Marketing 11,088,964 11,088,964 Travel and expenses - general 2,817,043 (239,903) 2,577,140 Employees' expenses 3,971,025 (652,964) 3,318,061 Supplies 25,960 - 25,960 Building rental and expenses - net 12,835,674 - 12,835,674 Autos 451,833 (13,764) 438,069 Taxes - general 658,222 658,222 Depreciation and amortization 870,307 - 870,307 Postage 486,748 - 486,748 Telephone 1,761,496 - 1,761,496 Subscriptions 126,102 - 126,102 Donations 135,974 (135,974) - Insurance and self-insurance 3,343,467 566,236 3,909,703 Bad debts 100,793 (100,793) - Office expenses 1,686,638 - 1,686,638 Interest - net 378,616 (378,616) - Professional Services 208,475 - 208,475 Printing 30,958 30,958 Temporary help 631,787 631,787 Goodwill 501,107 (501,107) - Marketing 5,159,825 (983,377) 4,176,448 Allocated expense 9,228,629 (4,327,024) 4,901,605 Computer expense 8,238,353 8,238,353 Administrative costs 2,857,662 (95,476) 2,762,186 Other - net 65,065 (41,413) 23,652 State income tax expense 653,770 57,669 711,439 Total General Overhead 97,952,129 (6,936,620) 91,015,509 Total Fringe Benefits and General Overhead S 133,488.497 $ 9,065,769 S 124,422,728 Total Fringe Benefits and General Overhead Rate 176.75. % 164.75 % See notes to financial statements. EXHIBIT C1 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE OF FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Facilities Capital Employed Secretary of Treasury Interest Rate Facilities Capital Cost of Money Direct Labor Base Facilities Capital Cost of Money Rate See notes to financial statements. 2001 $ 8,23 5,499 6.125 % $ 504,424 $ 75,523,512 0.66790% 3 EXHIBIT CI HDR ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS AND GENERAL OVERHEAD YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES HDR Engineering, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is a wholly -owned subsidiary of HDR, Inc. The Company is engaged in the business of providing engineering consulting services from offices located in major cities throughout the United States. The Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits and General Overhead and the Schedule of Facilities Capital Cost of Money excludes a non -engineering subsidiary, HDR Construction Control Corporation and a project management department established to track direct and indirect costs associated with one particular long-term contract. The significant accounting practices and system utilized by the Company include: a. Project Cost System — The Company maintains a project cost accounting system for the recording and accumulation of costs incurred under its contracts. Each project is assigned a project number so that costs may be segregated and accumulated in the Company's project cost accounting system. b. Proposals — The Company's policies for estimating costs for pricing purposes during the proposal process is consistent with its policies for the accumulation and reporting of costs under its project cost accounting system. Allocation from Parent — Overhead incurred by the Company's parent, HDR, Inc., is allocated to the Company based on direct labor and square footage, as appropriate, for the nature of the expense. This overhead is shown on the Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits and General Overhead as allocated expense. Allocation to Subsidiary — The Company allocates certain administrative costs of its overhead departments along with its share of HDR, Inc. costs between its operations and those of an operating subsidiary on the basis of direct labor. Insurance — Insurance costs, included in insurance and self-insurance in the Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits and General Overhead, represent a charge for the deductible portion under the Company's professional liability coverage and the Company's portion of the premium paid by HDR, Inc. for professional liability coverage of which a portion is returned to its captive insurance company Gold Cube. The costs incurred for the deductible portion of the professional liability coverage are based upon the deductible portion of claims paid averaged over the Iast five years. Depreciation — Depreciation for equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease or the life of the asset. Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected currently. EXHIBIT C1 g. Computer Allocation — The Company accumulates CADD and Technical Personal Computer (PC) costs in separate cost centers. These costs are charged directly to contracts using an hourly billing rate of $15.00 for CARD and $10.00 for PC. The actual cost per hour for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $15.56 for CADD and $14.28 for PC. If the costs of the two cost centers were combined, the actual blended cost per hour was $14.96. The variance between the costs charged directly to contracts and the total CADD and PC actual costs is included in the overhead pool. The total CADD and PC costs charged direct to contracts is $8,791,530. Had the Company not charged CADD and PC costs direct to contracts then these costs would have been included in the overhead pool and the resultant allowable indirect rate would be 176.39%. h. Cost ojMoney Rate — In accordance with FAR subpart 31.205-10, the Company has calculated a weighted average cost of money rate for the year ended December 31, 2001 based upon interest rates specified by the Secretary of Treasury under Public Law 9241. The facilities capital cost of money rate is computed in accordance with Cost Accounting Standard 414. Facilities cost is based on the average net book value of equipment for the year ended December 31, 2001. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division Aril 7, 2003 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... J.D. Wilson, x 7295 Abdoul Gafour, x 7210 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Addendum No. 2 to CAG-02-210 Engineering Consultant Correspondence.. Agreement with Economic and Engineering Services for Ordinance ............. Design of Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue paper Study Sessions...... Addendum No. 2 to CAG-02-210 Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure $ 99,914 Required... Amount Budgeted.. $150,000 Total Project Budget $165,000 (2003 total budget for design Account No. contract) 421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.55560 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Transfer/Amendment.. N/A Revenue N/A Generated........ . City Share Total $ 99,914 Project.. The City entered into consultant agreement CAG-02-210 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., on January 17, 2002, to design the water treatment improvements for the Maplewood wells. During the development of the project plans, staff from Water Utility Engineering, Water Maintenance and Parks Departments requested that the consultant's scope of work be expanded to include design modifications and additional geo-technical investigation work. An addendum to the consultant's contract in the amount of $99,914.00 is needed for the additional work. There are sufficient funds in the 2003 Water Utility Capital Improvement budget to cover this addendum to the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Addendum No. 2 to CAG-02-210, in the total amount of $99,914 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements\Design Contract with EES and KAagenda bill for contract addendum 2.docUDW:lf :E, -- S -off CITY OF RENT( PLANNING/BUILDING/PUS-- MEMORAND DATE: March 20, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Cou. Members of the Renton City VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: �`� Gregg Zimmerm�, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: J.D. Wilson x 7295 Abdoul Gafour x. 7210 SUBJECT: Addendum No. 2 to CAG-02-210 Engineering Consultant Agreement with Economic and Engineering Services for Design of Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements ISSUE: The City entered into consultant agreement CAG-02-210 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES), on January 17, 2002, to design the water treatment improvements for the Maplewood wells. During the development of the project plans, staff from Water Utility engineering, Water Maintenance and Parks Departments requested that the consultant's scope of work be expanded to include design modifications and additional geo-technical investigation work. An addendum to the consultant's contract is needed for the additional work. RECOMMENDATION: • The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Addendum No. 2 to CAG-02-210, in the total amount of $99,914 with EES, Inc. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: On January 17, 2002, the City entered into a consultant agreement with EES, Inc. to design a water treatment facility to improve the water quality of the Maplewood wells. The basic water treatment method consists of removing the manganese, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia from the raw water. These naturally occurring compounds cause taste, odor problems and staining of customers plumbing fixtures. March 20, 2003 Page 2 During the review of the preliminary plans for the project, City staff identified several design changes needed to allow more flexibility in the operation of the new facility. In addition, at the request of Renton Parks and Water Utility Departments, the consultant will perform detailed design for the following features, which were not included in the original scope of work for the contract nor Addendum No. 1 (building relocation design): Description of additional design work Estimated cost 1 Add a pressure reducing valve station to allow flexibility for providing $6,000 Maplewood water to the Downtown water supply 2 Perform additional geo-technical work for the design of the shoring $17,300 system for building excavation 3 Design a concrete retaining wall along the side of the building adjacent 24,100 to a steep slope 3 Expanded design of storm water system to accommodate future Parks $7,900 maintenance facility 4 Design of new netting and support system over the new parking lot and $18,200 relocated access road to protect parked cars from errant golf balls 5 Design of temporary paved access roads for various phases of project $8,200 for properties along north side of golf course 6 Design security features and modifications to the water telemetry and $18,300 control display system Total estimated cost $100,000 CONCLUSION: The above design changes will provide the City's Public Works and Parks Departments with a facility that meets all the Water Utility's operational need and Parks' need for more parking spaces at the Maplewood golf course. There are sufficient funds in the Water Utility's and Parks' 2003 project budgets to cover the cost of this addendum. Parks Department has agreed to reimburse the Water Utility for the design of the new netting and support system. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements\Design Contract with EES and KJ\Issue-Paper-Addendum#2.doc\JDW:lf ADDENDUM NO. 2 to CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CAG 02-010 Dated: January 17, 2002 This Addendum is made and entered into this day of , 2003 by and between the City of Renton, hereinafter called the "City" and Economic and Engineering Services, Inc.., hereinafter called the "Consultant". WITNESSETH THAT: Whereas, the City engaged the services of the Consultant under Consultant Agreement CAG 02-010 dated January 17, 2002, for project "Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements - Design". Whereas, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time; and Whereas, the City and the Consultant have determined that additional work is required to meet the goal of the project. Those additional work items being defined in Exhibit A with costs anticipated as shown in Exhibit B. NOW, therefore, in accordance with Section VIII, Extra Work, of Consultant Agreement CAG 02- 010, dated January 17, 2002, the agreement is amended as follows: 1. Revise the maximum amount payable under section VI, Payment, from $977,463.00 to $1,077,376.81. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 2 to CAG 02-010 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. as of the date and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF Renton Signature Gregory J. Kirmeyer Vice President CAG-01-017/ADDENDUM# 1 Date Signature Date Jesse Tanner Mayor Signature Date Bonnie Walton City Clerk CAG 02-u 10 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-A Item 2-100-A New PRV / Meter Vault and 196 Zone Piping Modifications Requested by: City Existing Contract Requirements: The existing scope of work did not include a PRV/meter vault for the 196 zone. Justification of additional labor effort required: Evaluations of existing piping and pressures. Meetings with Water Utility to establish specific vault requirements. 2 Evaluate and establish the location for the vault on the site. 3 Establish design criteria and select equipment. 4 Integrate into site utility design. Page 1 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-B Item 2-100-B Additional Geotechnccal Evaluations and Excavation Design Requested by: EES Existing Contract Requirements: Existing scope of work included a geotechnical evaluation of the site. However, found soil conditions and site constraints required more extensive geotechnical evaluations than anticipated to better establish excavation, shoring, and foundations design requirements. Justification of additional labor effort required: 1 Additional borings to better define characteristics bearing horizons for deep foundations. 2 Found soils conditions necessitated further evaluations of foundation system alternatives. 3 Final location of treatment building required more extensive development of shoring system alternatives. 4 Site and access constraints required more detailed excavation plan than anticipated, resulting in 3 additional design sheets. Page 2 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-C Item 2-100-C Expanded Stormwater Design for Future Golf Course Facilities Requested by: City (Parks Dept.) Existing Contract Requirements: Existing scope of work included stormwater facilities design for the immediate area affected by Water Utility additions only. No special soils evaluations were anticipated to develop stormwater disposal options. Justification of additional labor effort required: 1 Options for infiltrating as much drainage water as possible on -site were evaluated in order to try to minimize the size and extent of new drainage control facilities. This required digging several test pits to evaluate soils for infiltration capacity. The geotechnical engineer provided assistance these evaluations. 2 Because on -site infiltration proved to be unfeasible, the volume required for detention and treatment was larger than anticipated in the original scope of work. Thus, more effort was required to prepare the design of all utilities in the yard area in an already highly constrained site. Page 3 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-D Item 2-100-D Site Design for Temporary Access and Phasing Requested by: City (Parks Dept.) Existing Contract Requirements: Justification of additional labor effort required: The original anticipated location of the treatment building did not require the design of temporary access road and special construction phasing considerations. Also, the initial parking stall requirement was 38 stalls. 1 The final reatment building location resulted in a more complex access phasing plan during construction. 2 The requirement for number of parking stalls increased to 52, resulting in additional effort and coordination for the site plan. 3 Temporary access is needed for both vehicles and golf carts. Extensive interaction with Parks Dept. to develop the most feasible alignment of the temporary access ways. 4 Required 1 additional design sheet plus additions to specifications. Page 4 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-E Item 2-100-E Retaining Wall Design Requested by: EES Existing Contract Requirements: Scope of work assumed that only 3' - 5' high retaining walls would be necessary which do not require extensive soil bearing analyses and detailed wall design. Justification of additional labor effort required: 1 Finished grade elevations needed for drainage control and final location of the treatment building resulted in the need for a retaining wall along the east side of the access road adjacent to the driving range. 2 Evaluation of feasible options to address found soils conditions and concerns about settlement were required. 3 Two design sheets for the wall are required. Page 5 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-F Item 2-100-F Detailed Netting System Design Requested by: City Existing Contract Requirements: Existing scope of work was based on establishing the area to be covered by netting and providing a performance -based specification for the netting system only. Justification of additional labor effort required: 1 City desires to have more definitive design for netting system prior to construction so that costs can be better estimated and to minimize the possiblility of change order costs during construction. 2 The Golf Course has specific design requirements for the netting system to best maximize space for parking and minimize impacts to the golf course. 3 Location of the netting poles was closely coordinated with the civil/site design to avoid underground utilities and to optimize space on the site. Page 6 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-G Item 2-100-G Security & Safety Upgrades Requested by: City Existing Contract Requirements: The existing scope of work does not include security features. Justification of labor effort required: 1 Well/vault intrusion switches and alarm transmission were added 2 Added burglar bars on louvers larger than 90 sq. in. 3 Upgraded and strengthened doors and hardware for new treatment building 4 Added operator in trouble alarms to pump station and water treatment building Page 7 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit A - Item 2-100-H Item 2-100-H Booster Pump Controls Requested by: City Existing Contract Requirements: Modifying the existing pumps and control were not in the scope. Justification of labor effort required: 1 Modified booster pump controls to allow software to control pumps from either pressure zone 2 Added valve position signals and modified telemetry panel to indicate which zone the booster pumps are pumping to. 3 Added level sensors and control to existing clearwell. Page 8 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No, 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit B - Dollars - Economic Engineering Services Prepared: 03/11 /2003 Tasks Description Cost Plus Fee Determination Total Overhead Subtotal Net Fee Total Labor Direct Total Salary Cost: Costs @ 17i Salary Cost; @ 12% Cost Expenses Cost 2-100 Design Development $20,228.98 $34,389.27 $54,618.25 $6,554.19 $61,172.44 $12,850.00 $74,022.44 2-100-A New PRV/Meter Vault $1,924.28 $3,271.28 $5,195.56 $623.47 $5,819.02 $50.00 $5,869.02 & 196 Zone Piping 2-100-B Additional Geotechnical $5,681.12 $9,657.90 $15,339.02 $1,840.68 $17,179.71 $50.00 $17,229.71 and Evcavation Design 2-100-C Expanded Stormwater Design $2,578.20 $4,382.94 $6,961.14 $835.34 $7,796.48 $100.00 $7,896.48 for Future Golf Course Expansion 2-100-D Site Design for Temporary $2,687.06 $4,568.00 $7,255.06 $870.61 $8,125.67 $100.00 $8,225.67 Access and Phasing 2-100-E Retaining Wall Design $5,488.60 $9,330.62 $14,819.22 $1,778.31 $16,597.53 $50.00 $16,647.53 2-100-F Detailed Netting System $1,869.72 $3,178.52 $5,048.24 $605.79 $5,654.03 $12,500.00 $18,154.03 Design Page 9 of 10 CAG 02-010 Addendum No. 2 Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements Exhibit B - Dollars - Kennedy / Jenks Prepared: 03/11 /2003 Tasks Description Cost Plus Fee Determination Total Overhead Subtotal Net Fee Total Labor Direct Total Salary Costs Costs @ 170% Salary Costs @ 12% Cost Expenses Cost 2-100 Design Development $8,561.96 $14,555.33 $23,117.29 $2,774.08 $25,891.37 $0.00 $25,891.37 2-100-G Wellhouse Security $2,406.71 $4,091.41 $6,498.12 $779.77 $7,277.89 $0.00 $7,277.89 Features 2-100-H Modify Booster Pump $3,658.17 $6,218.89 $9,877.06 $1,185.25 $11,062.31 $0.00 $11,062.31 Control and Display 2-100-E Concrete Retaining Wall $2,497.08 $4,245.04 $6,742.12 $809.05 $7,551.17 $0.00 $7,551.17 Design Page 10 of 10 4/3/2003 E-mail correspondence (received since 3/27/03) expressing interest in having an off -leash dog park in Renton: City Residents: Nona Peterson 225 Vashon Ave. SE, Renton, 98059 Jennifer Garl 2601 NE 91h St., Renton 98056 Terry Angevine 514 Burnett Ave. N., Renton, 98055 Nathan Thornton 629 Cedar Ave S., #203, Renton, 98055 Roneida & Timothy Griffith 550 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton 98058 Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S., Renton, 98055 Bob & Nancy Prater 412 Pelly Ave. N., Renton 98055 Julie Hiatt 1726 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton 98158 Non -City Residents Vicki Dodge 18622 SE Lake Youngs Rd, Renton 98058 Chris Fleck 6123 S. 242°d Pl., #12-205, Kent, 98032 Darren & Davida St. Yves 16624 133`d Pl. SE, Renton, 98058 Jennifer Haines Boulevard Lanes, SE 192°d St., & 1401h Ave. SE Dollie Meyers 18919 140`h Ave. SE, Renton 98058 Sunny Kathlean Fairwood area Vicki Murphy no address given Elynn Clayton 21429 113`h Pl. SE, Kent Dr. Timothy White 12940 SE 185th St., Renton 98058 Shari Blevins Seattle resident 4/3/2003 *14"1- S/_ q.'gD03 \% ee E-mail correspondence eceived since 3/27/03) expressing interest in having an off -leash dog park in Renton: r City Residents: Nona Peterson 225 Vashon Ave. SE, Renton, 98059 Jennifer Galrl 2601 NE 9d' St., Renton 98056 Terry Angevine 514 Burnett Ave. N., Renton, 98055 Nathan Thornton 629 Cedar Ave S., #203, Renton, 98055 Roneida & Timothy Griffith 550 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton 98058 Jan Hickling Bob & Nancy Prater Julie Hiatt Non -City Residents ✓ Vicki Dodge Chris Fleck ✓ Darren & Davida St. ✓ Jennifer Haines ✓ Dollie Meyers ✓ Sunny Kathlean ✓ Vicki Murphy Elynn Clayton Dr. Timothy -White Shari Blevins 527 Renton Ave. S., Renton, 98055 412 Pelly Ave. N., Renton 98055 — -I Dan only 1726 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton 98158 — 46 71)am only 18622 SE Lake Youngs Rd, Renton 98058 C 6123 S. 242nd Pl., #12-205, Kent, 98032 -- a4-4 Yves 16624 133`d Pl. SE, Renton, 98058 Boulevard Lanes, SE 192nd St., & 140' Ave. SE 18919 140`h Ave. SE, Renton 98058 Fairwood area no address even 21429 113 Pl. SE, Kent 12940 SE 185d' St., Renton 98058 4o T)Q" onl' Seattle resident gent Dog Owners Group - Qu" ,opic bulletin board Page 1 of 2 Your free, preposterously easy instant discussion space lQuck.FiT . //J1 �: C.DU/1Ci�ef-5C�� Sion In to access your topic list - New Topic - New Doc Review - My Topics Mayor T nner Topic: Kent Dog Owners Group -7a� 600/,nJhn Views: 228, Unique: 117 What's m S�gPhefd Subscribers: 6 lul printer -Friendly Page to get & post, or stop messages by email [E] All messages 27-34 of 34 19-26 >> Who I When Messages row�i4"' 1"Mii . Dan Clawson 34 If you would like to see the City of Renton open an orr-ieasn parK, iei: 03-27-2003 09:17 PM PT (Us) the City Council membes know at council@ci.renton.wa.us. Elynn Clayton 33 Hi Dee Dee, 02-08-2003 os:44 PM Pr (us) Thank you so much for posting that to the web site and the QT. You are awesome! Elynn > < replied -to message removed by QT > DeeDee 32 Renton members and friends - show your support for an off -leash dog 02-08-2003 10:22 AM PT (US) park in the South End Renton Neighborhood Association meeting Thursday March 27, 2003 at 7:00pm at the Renton Housing Authority Office 2900 10th St. NE in the Renton Highlands see www.KDOGS.com for details Elynn Clayton 31 My corrupter is in the shop for repairs til next week so I don't have my KDOGS email list. Dee Dee, I have a question for you but don't have 06-15-200212:04 AM PT (US) your email tii I get my computer back. If you get this, could you send me an email so I can ask you a question. I can reply to all emails, I just don't have my addresses to create emails. Sorry for the inconvenience! DeeDee 30 2 dew -claws up to Wes!! Thanks for getting your voice, and KDOGS in 05-06-2002 11:26 PM PT (US) local newspapers and for your efforts and energy with Parks and Rec folks with City of Kent and King County. Wes House* 29 The Open House regarding plans to bring dog parks to South King County was a sucess for dogs and dog owners. This is a direct result of 04-25-2002 10:23 PM PT (us) your work to publicize the event, and the attendance by so many KDOGS people. The outlook for dog parks is very good. Thank You! Elynn Clayton 28 Nancy, if you check this again, thank you for your support. It's nice to 04-18-2002 05:33 PM PT (Us) know we have friends all over the country. < replied -to message removed by QT > Nancy Despeaux 27 Just want to wish you luck with your effort! I'm accross the country 04-18-2002 02:00 PM PT (US) from you, working for a dog park in my area in Northern Virginia, and came accross your web page in a search. Keep at it and you'll get your park! All messages 27-34 of 34 19-26 >> aflW d in 6,41es respatses rccei v�i-Mrou94i 5,'c»�OM 3-3/-�003, http://www.quicktopic.com/12/R/P2MANPAmuyMW 3/28/2003 From: To: Date: Subject: Council Via Clerk Nonapeterson@aol.com Fri, Mar 28, 2003 5:11 PM Re: Off -leash dog park Dear Ms. Peterson: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> <Nonapeterson @ aol.com> 03/27/03 09:11 PM >>> Council members, attended a meeting of the Highlands Community Association this evening concerning off -leash dog parks. I am very interested in having an off leash place in Renton. I will be contacting the Kent group that spoke at the meeting about their efforts to gain a dog space. At this time I drive my dog 20 miles to Marymoor park which is not convenient for exercising my large dog. If I can be of further Most dog owners would be very willing to volunteer in the process of developing the property for use as a dog place. The needs are small; a fenced safe area with a means to have waste cans and the means to pick up the waste. Thank you for your time in considering this issue. Nona Peterson 225 Vashon Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 nonai)eterson@aol.com From: Council Via Clerk To: Garl, Jennifer Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 5:16 PM Subject: Re: Off lease PARK in RENTON Dear Ms. Garl: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan,. and the results of that showed very low response or. interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Garl, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Garl@VerizonWireless.com> 03/28/03 06:29AM >>> Hello, Thank you for considering a off lease park in Renton. I would very much like to see this come together. Thank you and have a great weekend. Jennifer Garl 2601 NE 9th St. Renton, WA 98056 From: Council Via Clerk To: Terry Angevine Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 5:18 PM Subject: Re: Off leash dog park Dear Ms. Angevine: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If 1 can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Terry Angevine" <TAngevi @ rei.com> 03/28/03 07:48AM >>> Greetings, My name is Terry Angevine and I live in downtown Renton on Burnett Ave N. I would love to see an off leash park in Renton. Currently, we have a pretty extensive drive to get to a location which allows our dog to run freely. At over 100 Ibs, it can be difficult to get him the exercise and socialization he needs on a regular basis. Thank you for taking an off -leash park for the residents of Renton. (human and canine) into consideration. Regards, Terry Angevine 514 Burnett Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 From: Council Via Clerk To: Nate Thornton Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 5:19 PM Subject: Re: Off Leash Dog Park Dear Mr. Thornton: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and.it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Nate Thornton' <natethornton @ windermere.com> 03/28/03 07:55AM >>> Dear City Council Members, As a new citizen of Renton I would like to see an off- leash dog park established in the city limits. These areas build community identity and are well cared for and cherished. Off -leash park propenents have had a history here in our county of taking locations previously undesirable to other users and turning the areas into community assets. We need a place to safely exercise our beloved pets. We need an off -leash park. Nathan Thornton 629 Cedar Av S #203 Renton WA 98055 425-277-6261 From: Council Via Clerk To: Roneida Griffith Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 6:04 PM Subject: Re: off leash park Dear Ms. Griffith: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 i A4111 >>> Roneida Griffith <RGriffith@costco.com> 03/28/0312:10PM >>> Hi, My family is in the Renton area and we are writing in concerns for an off leash dog park. This would be beneficial to the area, what a great way for the whole family to spend the day together, my daughter loves watching the dogs play and currently we have to go all the way to Redmond. Needing a dog park in Renton, thanks for listening. The Griffith family 550 Pierce Ave. SE Renton, WA 98058 From: Council Via Clerk To: Tim Griffith Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2003 9:09 AM Subject: Re: Off -Leash Dog Park in Renton Dear Mr. Griffith: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If 1 can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Tim Griffith <triffith@costco.com> 03/31/03 08:53AM >>> City of Renton To whom it may concern, I am writing to you to express my interest in an off -leash dog park in the Renton area. As a citizen and member of the Renton community I think a dog park would do a great deal of good for the city. Please consider the addition of an off -leash dog park in the Renton area. Thank You, Timothy W. Griffith (425) 313-2912 tqriffith@costco.com 550 Pierce Ave. SE Renton, WA 98058 From: Council Via Clerk To: jan hickling Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: Re: off leash dog park Dear Ms. Hickling: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the Citys participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If 1 can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> jan hickling <jzhickling @ yahoo.com> 03/28/0312:26PM >>> I think an off -leash dog park in Renton would be great. I think the area across the brindge/river from Carco Park along the Cedar River trail is ideal. The people and their dogs could romp through the field without having to mow ect.They would probably also hike up through the hills which would hopefully chase away the creepy people who live in tents throughout the area. I don't know if you realize how many drunks and junkies live up above the Cedar River Trail. Hiking through the hills is not safe for the average person and it is only a matter of time before somebody gets hurt along the Cedar River Trail. I hope you will seriously consider this issue. Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S. Renton, Wa. 98055 --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? From: Council Via Clerk To: vicki dodge Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 6:26 PM Subject: Re: off leash dog park Dear Ms. Dodge: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> vicki dodge <bullymama@yahoo.com> 03/28/03 03:54PM >>> Please consider an off leash dog park in Renton or Kent. Sincerely, Vicki Dodge 18622 SE Lake Youngs Rd. Renton, WA 98058 Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com From: Council Via Clerk To: Slinging6strings@wmconnect.com Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 6:07 PM Subject: Re: Want an off leash park in Renton? TAr. FIu,K- Dear A us. On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies Will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan; and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>><Slinging6strings@wmconnect.com> 03/28/03 01:30PM >>> I am going to be buying a house wanted to move to Kent but since Kent won't do the off leash dog park and Renton is considering I may be buying our house in Renton? Is this park important to me? yes very. It is our favorite thing to do for us! !I Not only for the dogs when my family comes up from North Dakota that is where they always want to go to the off leash park in marymoore which is way far to drive. thank you. From: <Slinging6strings@wmconnect.com> To: <Council @ ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Sat, Mar 29, 2003 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Want an off leash park in Renton? Yes, currently my address is in Kent, but I am considering purchasing a house in Renton. My name and address are as follows Chris Fleck 6123 S 242nd Place 412-205 Kent, Wa 98032 From: Council Via Clerk To: Vicki Murphy Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 5:57 PM Subject: Re: off -leash dog park Dear Ms. Murphy. On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you Wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the Citys participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 From: Council Via Clerk To: Vicki Murphy Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2003 6:32 PM Subject: Re: off -leash dog park Dear Ms. Murphy. Would it be possible for you to email back with your address so the Renton City Council has it for the record? We would appreciate it. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton Renton City Clerk >>> Vicki Murphy <VMurphy@costco.com> 03/2810311:30AM >>> An off -leash dog park would be a great thing to have in Renton. Vicki Murphy From: Council Via Clerk To: Darren St. Yves Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2003 8:20 AM Subject: Re: Off Leash park in Renton Dear Mr. St. Yves: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Darren St. Yves" <dstyves @ costco.com> 03/30/03 07:55AM >>> Please give us an off leash site for our dogs to run and play. Thank You Residents, Darren and Davida St. Yves Costco Wholesale Inc. Loss Prevention 425.427.7142 dstvves@costco.com 16624 133rd Place SE Renton, WA 98058 1.y From: Council Via Clerk To: Jennifer Haines Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2003 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Off Leash Area In Renton? Dear Ms. Haines: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. There are no off -leash dog parks within the Renton City limits; however, I am aware of two King County Parks that have off -leash areas. They are: Marymoor Park, 6046 West Lake Sammamish Parkway NE, Redmond, and Luther Burbank Park, 2040 84th Ave. SE, Mercer Island. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the. May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or . interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County. Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Jennifer Haines <)Haines@costco.com> 03/31/03 09:14AM >>> - Hello! '� ! I recently purchased a house in the Boule rard Lane neighborhood off of 192 and 140 streets. I am curious about the existence o an off leash park in/'�' is area where I could bring my dogs and allow them to run and play with out leashes. I moved here from Seattle, where I had the pleasure of taking my dogs to Magnuson Park or to the Genesee off leash areas. It is important for our four legged friends to have an area to run, play and socialize with out having leases to constrain them. Is there currently an off leash area in Renton? If so where can I find it? If not are there plans for one in the future? Please let me know ASAP, thanks for your time. Thanks, Jennifer Haines Assistant Buyer Costco Wholesale Computers PH 425-313-8220 FAX 425-313-8466 ihaines@costco.com Go Supersonics! "We'll always love The Glove" From: Council Via Clerk To: Dollie Myers Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: Re: off leash Dear Ms. Myers: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in the South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Dollie Myers <mzwildhair@yahoo.com> 03/31/0310:53AM >>> To whom it may concern, We need an off leash dog park in Renton! Dollie Myers & Klowie (the dog) 18919 140th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98058 Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://Platinum.yahoo.com From: Council Via Clerk To: Sunny Kathlean Date: Mon, Mar 31, 200311:37 AM Subject: Re: Off leash park Dear Ms. Kathlean: On behalf of City Council, I would like to thank you for your email regarding an off -leash dog park. Copies will be forwarded to each Councilmember, Mayor Tanner and the Community Services Administrator for review. Two Council committees explored this subject approximately one year ago and Council took action at the May 6, 2002, Council meeting by concurring with staff recommendation to continue participation on the South King County Task Force for the development of a South King County Off Leash Area Dog Park. Council stated that no consideration was being made at that time to place an off -leash facility within the City limits. Our Parks Director has stated that a citizen survey was conducted as part of the update of the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the results of that showed very low response or interest for an off -leash dog Park in Renton. Knowing this is important to some Renton citizens, however, the City is participating in th6 South King County Regional Off -Leash Dog Park committee. It is my understanding that this group is considering a regional off -leash dog park in the Sea Tac area. If you wish, please feel free to contact our Parks Director, Leslie Betlach, at 425-430-6619 for more information about the City's participation on the committee. Please know that your input is appreciated and it will be reviewed by Council. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Sunny Kathlean <SKathlean@costco.com> 03/31/0310:21AM >>> Hello Bonnie, I was talking with my friend Jennifer Haines who had inquired with you about an off leash park in the Renton area, I live in the area as well and would be interested in having such facilities in the area for our dogs run free with no worries. Thank you for your time and I just wanted to �C let you know there is interest for this type of park in the Renton(Fairwood) area. Thank you, Sunny Kathlean n v N ° C O C LJ c 0 E $L C C 0 c E o U coo @2Q C N O N = '0 N N a�c�c c U o o Uca0 c $ Q Y W = LL y C _ L (Q Cc CA Q L .°. m E 4) C) O O Z y E CDO 4)0..V 0-aQcasM4) �ccg)QMwrEf'EL p .. p -p Y N p O 0 a p o(D carco�.o0 v E c N 2tt-- (D � c 0 p p C M a) C� N .4) C N (D .— a) o ,Q ca w o c EionO C N+.Cpo O O t O° •LCpyONy= m O O 5.9 CL O� 4) O �O ViwCD 0 4) NCO, N O NU N C C�3 C o� N2cts 002 a� a, O a)0 CD Q o > c c c c &- E=°., >,y E 3 $ Z= E co 3Y c _ -p 0O 0 4) >,4) y C= C Q O p N >,00 3'� •pL 3 N c E M coo 4) 75 a)� L ELw ° $ Y N a� c" o cLo C++ o._._ N $ c o $z4)rn'�*'cLa4)l E o�. c:.aCO(D $_oz,Lr=oo4) �'°' a�8O t3 - 4) OJZ 8 d L O o �- �(/j X E O cw C> rnaO m 4) O .0 �g ° L W ,o p_co 'a ocdE —� 4) E 0::. v 4) L o t_ � L a'"' $.E E o• Cif o� L ° 0) a) d c c w co c vJ O °.C' ac N 4c) w 44)? 3 C'_ rn— f°2 3s o ui ca N L c ° >°,"' � co 3 � E c'� 4)L o a � 4°')0 °' 'E C 4)-0— 0 L O 00 \ Y E V= O 3 C y Co �p N 4)4- ad� N= >, \ O— E N C N._. N.O v� $ OyCO� O N (a c c� ° x N E �° v = ° =N $ > c3 �= c c cod ° °' E-a 4ci a t € 0 cco � � o � � No 0 4) m� N.0,_SU co m aM E °= O O O` c0 O C C— '~' E .� N ` 3 4) 'fl E H C 4) y C) W N W= O •y = o .V U°= L N p 0 C� O O O E \ Y O t COO M N co co = +• O C y N$ +a O Q a >' �� 4) a p 3 t N E ;7 _ 0 � .a >,'' a L= 4) . 'O O C ►.: Q$ '� �� a y CV C C O O U cc ° O L `�. 'C O 4) O a wo C i Y 4) = O " a 0 co ._ co •C U C 4) O 7 � 7 X L �- � C O� .. L L> y O CV L- 4) 4) N O� U = 3 O L O G2 O N c4 4) y ._ O C co e- co C 4) Y 4) N O U L C .S Co >+ O O C 4) O O C 'a 4) a ?� co a >, L O N L o= o o L 3 0_ a= E L U a� t a) 0 4) UM ». a== c o.. $ �c o - c x «. p co " to �rn0J �- co c_ coo_° y E ° o= c o�:a �. _IMco m.. Ew a) :°o. a o= o ». a� ON=.rC,+ o $c E 4) L N c --0 L y co $Y C) N p C� N' cm O 4% C� Q N U,oO S E G O O�� p ;a c= ° N O 0 0 cc L1 co._. Co N c0 y �Ln _O 'L z5 41 U N-7 ccO 0 •p C 4) Q' �_ s° a` E p N� _ .. = �- C co N O O • V O CT C C 4) Q d y 4) 'C) " ' . ' O 4) c0 CU o O L p O o = C ,_, C) (� >, 4) U 4) 2 E 4s o O O co co 0 0 �'c o = cY c E oL cc E >°,c Esc v cQ m °°?ate °'MCC M -� a c = y '0)Qcn E > c m-C 3 � 02 0.0 � > �� � p= � Co aci o > ° 0 4)" co L N � c c 0 Co 0-0 (D— .co 4) oU C (D U) 'CU O. $ O.� 0 =� c..w Op � N =U Z'>;C� E co m a3.. $ N o E s co- c E =' U L.. 0 �'N o c cU °'- 3- o LO Z3 00 c L o c o N O o C O O co C3 V OQ O C L O �'a c0 o_ co c� c aQ a�Q a)o N p LU >, M o = o c c °)c=w N o° o� C c m c ?� dCQ C C C N C 4) C C) 7 «. O C O+ N fo O E O O C N �. `__ `• 3 R) y=., '- N Y_ >' O >, o 4) Y O 4) N 3 N +' N a N co C O �Z »+ 4) ... O O.+ Q= N N O— p L Y 4) L L 4) O >+ cC = •- • p E O O L .. W C i-% O '� 4) L E 0 a t/J >, — (n 'O U ?� (� = d co "'. a N E U 2 C , 4) 'o L 4) v- ch c oHo Uoa)3oa)a�co4)coo?� �U L�Lco gU$-0 c,..J�vi ao dp 4) Y3 Nc a�'=Uo� O E� 4.; (D c`a °aE � E c E N c`a cco �,O p0 �U 13 cco $t°n0 E O aUE ° can. -cog aU Ecc—n 0 i °oa�o po4)�ccaa)a)E 4)r-r 1 LL -cnto Q_ Ec•� cow E� E o E c-i �E--05M n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n From: "Dan Clawson" <dclawson@seanet.com> To: <elynnc@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: KDOGS off leash park and Renton Hi Elynn, I just this morning saw your April 1 email. I have to catch up with Council matters on the weekends. I did not see the response from Bonnie Walton either. Ms. Walton has no authority to speak for the City Council or any Council member other than to acknowledge receipt of an email and forward it to the Council members to whom the message was addressed. She did not to my knowledge consult with any Council Member before sending her response to you. I strongly disagree with her statement that there is very low interest in in an off -leash park in Renton. The citizen survey she refers to showed substantial interest in a dog park, I believe it was over 30%. The City Council will decide whether or not to build a dog park. We will of course consider the concerns of the Administration, especially the Parks Director, as well as the costs and risks involved. This evening I will be asking the Council to refer the matter of the off -leash park to the Community Services Committee for study and possible action. I hope this answers your concerns. Thanks to KDOGS for your help in this. Dan Clawson CC: <dclawson2@seanet.com>, <council@ci.renton.wa.us> `Xr, v,` From: To: Date: Subject: ed; 6a4izd (8) Council Via Clerk jan hickling Wed, Apr 2, 2003 8:04 AM Re: off leash dog park Dear Ms. Hickling: All Council members are receiving and reviewing this and all other communications regarding an off -leash dog park. Council may choose to discuss or reconsider this topic at the next Council meeting or at a subsequent meeting. Please be assured your concerns are being heard. As for the survey, this was conducted in November of 2001 by a professional polling firm. A number of public meetings and focus groups were also conducted. For more information on the survey and the information gathered, please feel to contact Sylvia Allen, Recreation Director at 425-430-6609. Your input is appreciated. You will be notified If Council takes any further action on this issue. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> jan hickling <jzhickling@yahoo.com> 04/01/03 01:07PM >>> Re: reply to original off -leash dog park suggestion The city of Kent has flat out refused to have an off -leash dog park. There is will be NO dog park in Sea-Tac area. Kent has refused to participate. Aside from that, I live in Renton and I walk my dog in Renton and I would like an off -leash area in Renton. I have asked friends and neighbors and NOBODY I know saw a survey asking about interest in an off -leash dog park. Everybody I have spoken to thinks the idea is great. I would like to persue this issue further. I know there is at least one council member, perhaps two, who like the idea. What are the reasons against a park? Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S. Renton, W a. 98055 --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Daniel Clawson - Off leash do From: jan hickling <jzhickling@yahoo.com> To: dan cawson <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2003 9:06 PM Subject: Off leash dog park Dear Mr. Clawson, I have sent a letter to the City Concil regarding an off leash dog park in Renton as I was encouraged to do and recieved a blanket refusal type letter. I followed that up with another email and was basically told to go away, the city council isn't interested. I am confused by such a negative response. Did I misunderstand your interest? And how does the clerk know what the council thinks anyhow? I can't imagine the whole group of your were actually called and questioned within the 24 hours it took to reply to my email. Any clarification you can give me will be greatly apprecaied. Thank you, Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S. Renton, Wa. 98055 Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Rand Corman - Off leash dog ark Page 1 From: jan hickling <jzhickling@yahoo.com> To: <rcorman@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: Off leash dog park Hello Councilman - I sent an e-mail to all concilman and got back a blanket refusal letter. I have been told your a friend to animals so I am hopefully, contacting you directly. What are the first steps to getting an off -leash dog park in Renton? Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S.' Renton, Wa. 98055 Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more From: Daniel Clawson To: jzhickling@yahoo.com Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 8:59 AM Subject: Re: Off leash dog park Dear Ms. Hickling, Thank you for your e-mail correspondence. I did not have time to catch up on last week's emails until this morning. I also did not know about the response from City Clerk Bonnie Walton until this morning, when I found it printed in my correspondence as I prepared for this evenings Council meeting. Frankly, Ms. Walton has no authority to speak on behalf of the City Council. She did not consult with any of us prior to sending her response. Furthermore, it is not the Parks Administrator's decision whether the City of Renton will or will not have an off -leash dog park, it is the City Council that will make that decision. The Administration has concerns about liability, cost, etc., and the Council will listen to these concerns and make an informed decision wether the benefits of a dog park outweigh the costs and risks. am one of seven Council Members and four votes are needed to establish a dog park (5 to override a Mayoral veto). But I am committed to seeing that this matter is taken up by the Council, and would certainly like to see an off -leash park if it can be done safely and economically, which I think it can. I intend to refer this matter to the Community Services committee of the City Council at this evening's meeting, and request that the meeting be held soon. You will be notified of the meetings and I hope you will attend. Sincerely, Dan Clawson >>> jan hickling <jzhickling@yahoo.com> 04/02/03 21:06 PM >>> Dear Mr. Clawson, I have sent a letter to the City Concil regarding an off leash dog park in Renton as I was encouraged to do and recieved a blanket refusal type letter. I followed that up with another email and was basically told to go away, the city council isn't interested. I am confused by such a negative response. Did I misunderstand your interest? And how does the clerk know what the council thinks anyhow? I can't imagine the whole group of your were actually called and questioned within the 24 hours it took to reply to my email. Any clarification you can give me will be greatly apprecaied. Thank you, Jan Hickling 527 Renton Ave. S. Renton, W a. 98055 Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more CC: council@ ci.renton.wa.us Daniel Clawson - Re: Off leash do arl Page 1 . From: jan hickling <jzhickling@yahoo.com> To: Daniel Clawson <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 12:34 PM Subject: Re: Off leash dog park Hurray for you. I look forward to hearing of any meetings I can attend. thank you for your time and support Jan Hickling and Maya the dog Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more CITY OF RENTON APR 0 8 2003 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WFrom: To: Date: Subject: Council Via Clerk Terry Angevine Tue, Apr 1, 200310:58 AM RE: Off leash dog park Dear Ms. Angevine: Thank you for your email inquiry. The survey information you are inquiring about is on file in our Community Services Department. By copy of this email, I am notifying the Community Services Administrator and the Parks Director of your request. You will receive a response from them within a few days. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Terry Angevine" <TAngevi @ rei.com> 04/01/03 08:54AM >>> Dear Ms Bonnie Walton, Thank you for your reply. I'm interested in finding out more about the citizen survey that took place. How and when was it conducted? How were survey participants selected? What was the sample size of persons questioned? What types of questions were asked? I have lived in Renton for three years and this is the first time I've heard anything about a survey being conducted. I'm also a North Renton Neighborhood Association member and would think this survey information would have been extended to all Neighborhood Associations. I would like to bring this information to our next neighborhood meeting, this month. Is it possible for you to send me a copy of this survey and its evaluation? Thank you in advance for your help with this. Sincerely, Terry Angevine From: Sylvia Allen To: TAngevi@rei.com Date: 4/1/03 2:01 PM Subject: Off -leash Dog Park Dear Ms Angevine, Thank you for your inquiry about an off -leash dog park. As Leslie Betlach mentioned, a statistically valid survey was conducted in November 2001 by a professional polling firm, as a part of the deve o ment of our Long-range Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. In addition, a number of public meetings and focus groups were also conducted. The information gathered during this process was used to determine our citizens priorities for the Citys limited financial and natural resources. I have attached Chapter 10 from the plan, which explains the process and the data that was obtained from the telephone survey. I will be happy to answer any additional questions that you have about this information. Sylvia H. Allen, CPRP, CPSI Recreation Director City of Renton Phone: 425-430-6609 e-mail: sallen@ci.renton.wa.us CC: Betlach, Leslie; Shepherd, James; Walton, Bonnie Chapter 10: Public opinion Public opinions were collected concerning park, recreation, and open space issues from a variety of sources. Following is a brief summary of major findings; the complete telephone survey results are shown in the appendix. 10.1 Public meetings and workshops The following public meetings and workshops were conducted over the course of the planning process: • Recreation provider meetings - were conducted with the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts, and Renton YMCA during May 2001. Meeting participants reviewed recreational facilities and programs being provided and planned by each jurisdiction and discussed joint venture options. The joint venture concepts were eventually incorporated into the strategies outlined in chapter 7 and plan elements in chapter 9 of this document. • Long-range planning group meeting — was conducted with the Economic Development/Neighborhood Strategic Planning Department in May 2001. Meeting participants reviewed the revitalization efforts underway in the downtown, North Highlands, and Port Quendall and discussed strategies for locating and developing recreational facilities therein. The facility proposals were eventually incorporated into specific plan elements in chapter 9. • Adjacent park jurisdictions meetings — were conducted with King County and Tukwila in May 2001. Meeting participants reviewed long-range plans, capital facility programs, and funding strategies -for each jurisdiction and discussed coordination efforts. The trail proposals in particular were eventually incorporated into the plan elements in chapter 9. • Non -motorized Trail Committee workshops — were conducted in May and September 2001. Workshop participants reviewed the previous non -motorized trails and route proposals and discussed which elements should be incorporated into a consolidated parks and trails plan. The on and off -road bike and hike trail proposals were eventually incorporated into the plan elements in chapter 9. • Public charrettes — were conducted in June 2001 at the Renton Community Center with representatives of park and recreation user and interest group organizations. Charrette participants identified features they liked and disliked about the existing park, recreation, and open space system. Charrette participants then brainstormed alternative improvement plans for the various elements of the park, recreation, and open space plan. including conservancies, resource parks, trails, athletic fields, indoor facilities, and programs. The LI/ charrette concepts were evaluated and developed into alternative plans and eventually tested for public support during the subsequent telephone survey. Many of the brainstorming concepts are included in plan elements in chapter 9. Intercept surveys —were conducted of Renton River Days participants in July 2001. The surveys asked participants to review and identify program and facility priorities for the urban growth area over the planning period. The results of the intercept surveys were used to design the subsequent telephone survey. • Public forums — were conducted with representatives of user groups, interest groups, neighborhood representatives, and the general public at Highlands Neighborhood Center and Maplewood Golf Course during October 2001. Forum participants reviewed the draft proposed planning elements for conservancies, resource parks, trails, athletic fields, indoor facilities, and programs. The participants also reviewed and help draft the contents of the telephone survey to establish final plan contents and financial strategies. • Park Board workshops — were conducted over the course of the planning process to review the results of inventory, public surveys and workshops, alternative plan contents, financial strategies, and the final plan document. The contents of this plan document represent the consensus opinions formulated during the Park Board sessions. 10.2 Telephone survey Resident voter households were recruited in November 2001 to participate in a controlled survey concerning park, recreation, and open space needs and priorities using random sampling techniques. Approximately 450 households agreed to participate in the survey and were mailed a copy of a summary description of the plan and a copy of the questionnaire. 200 households — the size of the sample objective, completed surveys during follow-up telephone calls, of which 48% were male and 53% were female voters. The remaining households were contacted but for various reasons did not complete their surveys by the time the 200-sample group objective had been completed. The survey results are accurate to within..+/-8% of the opinions of the general population (the statistics are rounded and may not add to 100%). The statistics also account for undecided (ranged from 0 to 3% of the total) but do not depict the percents in the tables shown. Following is a brief summary of the findings for the total sample group - the complete telephone survey contents are provided in the appendix. Location of residence The respondents home address reflects the current distribution of registered voter households: 7% live in the downtown, 6% live in West Hill/Earlington, 23% live in Kennydale, 7% live in Tiffany Park, 9% live in North Highlands, 8% live in Talbot Hill, and 5% live in East Highlands, 5% live in Maplewood. 3% live in Renton Hill 218 Most survey participants are very long time residents of Renton: 0% resident 0-1 years, 14% resident 6-10 years, and 20% resident 2-5 vears _ 66% resident 10+ years. Type of housing Most survey participants are homeowners: 90% own their home, 11 % rent their home. Age rou Most survey participants are very long time residents of Renton: 1 % age 18-24, 35% age 50-64, and 13% age 25-34, 16% age 65+ years. 37% age 35-49, 10.3 Recreation program priorities Survey participants were asked if household members had participated in recreational programs provided by the city, school district, or another public or private agency in the last year. 67% used oroaram in last vear. 33% had not. Survey participants were asked to rate the need for the city, school district, or another public or private agency to provide a list of recreation programs in Renton in general on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the least important and 5 is the most important. A choice was considered critical or very important if the participants selected ratings of 4 or 5 in high percentages, nice -to -have or medium if the participants selected a 3 rating, and not important if the participants selected ratings of 1 or 2 in high percentages. Following is a rank ordering of their selections. Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 Recreational program in priority sequence Low Medium hi n Beforetafter school childcare/latch key? 13% 17% . 71 % Senior social and health activities? 10% 21 % 70% Special events — Renton River Days, Concerts? 8% 24% 68% Teen social and education activities? 7% 260/6 68% Outdoor athletic leagues and clinics (non -school) 11 % 32% 57% — baseball, softball, soccer — all ages? Physical conditioning and fitness — all ages? 15% 29% 56% Indoor athletic leagues and clinics (non -school) — 14% 34% 53% basketball and volleyball — all ages? Aquatic instruction and recreation — all ages? 24% 22% 53% Special populations — all skills and disabilities? 18% 32% 49% Environmental education/involvement — all ages? 26% 34% 40% Drama and performinq arts — all apes? 30% 41 % 29% Arts and crafts instruction — all ages? 27% 47% 25% Self-help — finance, health, fashion — all ages? 34% 41 % 25% Skiing, hiking, and special events — all ages? 50% 32% 18% Sailing and kayaking — all ages? 64% 23% 13% Pet training and instruction classes — all ages? 63% 27% 10% 410 Note - the overall results indicate the relative rank -order importance the survey participants gave these needs as a general population - and therefore, which needs would likely receive the highest general population approval ratings where general funds, for example, to be used to finance program services. Conversely, a low rank -order does not mean the need should or does not need to be provided. Rather, that the need may appeal to a more limited age or interest group (pet training and instruction, for example) and may nto be funded by special means or discretionary revenue sources rather than general monies. Program costs Survey respondents were asked to rate the following methods of paying for recreational programs assuming that it would require more money to provide present or future services. Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 Pro ram cost option in priority sequence Increase user fees for non-residents — to finance program services? Low 9% Medium 11 % High 80% Increase user fees for everyone -to finance 26% 36% 40% program services? Reduce the number— of programs to control 41 % 27% 32% costs? Reduce the content variety, and duration — of . 41 % 26% 32% programs to control costs? Increase city tax revenues — to finance program 57% 25% 19% services? 10.4 Facility priorities in general Survey respondents were asked how they rated the existing inventory of park, recreation, and open space facilities provided in Renton by the city, school district, and other park providers on a scale of 1 to 5? Ratings 1 +2 3 4+5 Low ter— the number and location of existing park and trail sites to serve the existing r — of maintenance conditions ana fumishings including parking, restrooms, water fountains, and other equipment in In general, the respondents gave the existing inventory high ratings, the quantity of facilities more so than the quality of existing facility conditions. A principal objective of the telephone survey was to determine what resident voters thought about possible project priorities - especially which projects should be considered for general funding applications as opposed to special funding revenues or strategies. 220 Consequently, survey participants were asked to select project proposals on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 was the lowest and 5 the highest priority. The responses were described exactly as defined below without the aid of illustrations or other materials. The results indicate how resident voters react in general to these concepts rather than to any project design or content particulars. Following is a rank ordering of their priorities by project category. Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 Park facilities in priority sequence Low Medium Hign On -road sidewalks to schools, parks, business 17% 22% 62% districts with trees, benches, amenities? Teen activity center? 13% 30% 57% Children's playgrounds and play areas? 16% 28% 57% On -road bicycle routes to schools, employment 20% 26% 55% centers, business districts, citywide? Off -road walking and hiking trails between 19% 30% 52% neighborhoods, parks, schools? Multipurpose hike and bike trails? 17% 32% 52% Indoor aquatics with swimming/leisure pool? 22% 28% 52% Senior activity center? 20% 30% 51 % Handicap accessible trails within parks? 22% 31 % 48% Daycare and child nursery facilities? 27% 27% 47% Outdoor aquatics with swimming/leisure pool? 33% 22% 45% Wildlife habitat and conservation areas? 28% 30% 43% Soccer fields? 260/6 37% 39% Baseball and softball fields? 22% 40% 39% Indoor gym and physical conditioning facilities? 24% 39% 380/0 Nature and interpretive trails within parks? 28% .34% 38% Community and pea -patch gardens? 28% 37% 35% Basketball, volleyball, and tennis courts? 23% 44% 34% Historical buildings and museums? 25% 45% 32% Performing arts and theater facility? 36% 35% 31 % Community classrooms and meeting rooms? 34% 39% 29% Off -lease pet parks? 56% 19% 27% Power and sailboat launching and moorage? 46% 30% 25% Off -road bicycle trails into backcountry areas? 46% 31 % 23% Skateboard and roller -blade courts? 53% 25% 23% Kayak and canoe access on Lake Washington? 45% 34% 22% Arts and crafts facilities? 43% 37% 21 % Golf course and driving ranges? 65% 22% 14% Working farms with animals and equipment? 58% 29% 13% Rock climbing, mountaineering, orienteering? 660/6 23% 11 % Note - the overall results indicate the relative rank -order importance the survey participants gave these projects as a general population - and therefore, which projects would likely receive the highest general population approval ratings where general funds or general obligation bonds, for example, to be used to finance project developments. Conversely, a low rank -order does not mean the project should or does not need to be accomplished. Rather, that the project may appeal to a more limited age or 221 interest group (rock climbing, mountaineering, and orienteering, for example) and may be funded by special means or discretionary revenue sources rather than general monies. 10.5 Project priorities Survey participants were also asked to select project proposals on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 was the lowest and 5 the highest priority for specific project proposals that were illustrated. The results indicate how resident voters react to these project concept particulars. Following is a rank ordering of their priori ies by project. Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 in r.rinrifv ¢nn"anr_a Low Medium Hiqh Renton Square — convert the former car 12% 14% 74% dealership building at Piazza Park into a multipurpose special events space with room for farmers market exhibitions and other activities? Conservancies environmental— protect important 13% 18% 70% environmental areas of the city including additional new sites along Lake Washington and the Cedar River? Teen center— develop an after school or after 11 % 27% 62% hours teen activities center at the community building in Liberty Park and/or at middle school sites? Restrooms — develop additional restroom 12% 28% 60% facilities in major community parks throughout the cityl Renton Green — develop a multipurpose "village 18% 27% 545/6 green" at the former Denny Renton (Narco) brick yard site across the river from Cedar River Park for soccer playing area, kite flying, frisbee, and special events? Indoor aquatics center— develop indoor 29% 19% 52% swimming and leisure pool complex at Cedar River Park? Walking and hiking trails — develop a network of 14% 35% 51 % on and off -road sidewalks and walking trails with access to schools, parks, and other community facilities? Picnic tables — develop picnic facilities that are 20% 30% 50% easily accessible to all residential neighborhoods? Playgrounds — develop a system of playgrounds 20% 29% 50% within a 1h mile radius of all residential areas? Auditoriums stages and lame meeting rooms — 22% 29% 50% jointly schedule major meetings and other community events using existing city, school, hotel and church facilities? Gymnasiums — improvetexpand gymnasium and 14% 37% 48% fitness facilities at school sites to provide after school and evening events for youth and adults? 222 Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 Low Medium High sidewalks and gateways — develop major 22% 32% 46% _Urban on -road sidewalks with landscaping, street trees, benches, signage, and other amenities between the downtown and major community business districts? Waterfront access — develop additional 21 % 34% ` 4% waterfront access and swimming beach facilities on Lake Washington and the Cedar River? Conservancies historical — identify historical 23% 35% 43% buildings and exhibit interpretive information about the city's historical waterfront, coal mines, downtown business buildings, and other heritage features? Picnic shelters — develop picnic shelters or group 19% 37% 43% picnic facilities at major community ark sites? Special populations center— develop a facility for 24% 34% 42% special needs children at the community building in Liberty Park and/or at a school sites? On -road bicycle routes — develop a system of on- 21 % 36% 42% road bicycle routes providing access to schools, parks, and other community facilities using road shoulders and designated bike lanes along major streets? Youth basebalYsoftbaff fields — improve/develop 20% 37% 42% additional baseball fields for younger age players at school and other new park sites? Veterans Memorial — develop a memorial 34% 25% 42% honoring all war veterans in a downtown park setting? Multipurpose trails — develop a network of off- 24% 360/6 41 % road hike, bike, and some horse trails connecting neighborhoods to Lake Washington, the Cedar and Green Rivers, Cougar Mountain, and regional sites? Gyms — neighborhood recreation buildings — 32% 27% 41 % phase out small neighborhood recreation buildings and develop joint, use facilities at school sites instead? Youth/adult basebalUsoftball fields — develop 22% 37% 40% additional competition fields for older age youth and adults at new park sites? Outdoor aquatics center— develop outdoor 38% 24% 39% swimming and leisure pool complex at Cedar River Park? Soccer fields — improveldevelop additional youth 26% 36% 37% and adult soccer fields at school and other new ark sites? LLJ Ratings 1 +2 3 4+5 I nw Medium Hiah Gyms - North Highlands Neighborhood Center 32% 29% 36% (16th and Kirkland}— demolish the existing building and develop a new building as a joint ark/school facility? Environmental exhibits — develop interpretive 38% 28% 35% exhibits at coal field, salmon, water recharge, and aquifers. Arts center— develop an arts center with 35% 34% 31 % instruction areas, artist studios, galleries, and exhibition space in the community building at Liberty Park. Basketball courts — develop additional basketball 28% 42% 30% courts at park sites with group use picnic facilities? Tennis courts — locate and light tennis courts at 30% 40% 30% middle and high school sites for joint student and public use. Boat tours — license a tour boat concession of 50% 21 % 29% the lake and surrounding waterways for residents and tourists during the summer months from Coulon Park? Rail trail — operate a local recreational trolley for 55% 20% 26% residents and tourists on the existing railroad line from Fort Dent to Port Quendall? Fishing access — designate additional fishing 39% 36% 25% access sites on Lake Washin ton? Water trails — develop access and launch sites 40% 36% 23% for water trails on Lake Washington and the Cedar River for kayaks, canoes, and hand cant' boats? Power and sailboat launch ramps — develop 51 % 27% 23% additional facilities on Lake Washin ton? Historical exhibits — develop interpretive exhibits 45% 31 % 23% at the former Denny Renton (Narco) brick factory and Port Quendall sites? Volleyball courts — develop additional sand 38% 40% 22% volleyball courts at park sites with group use picnic facilities? Off -leash dog park— designate an off -leash dog 57% 21 % 22% area at the former Denny Renton (Narco) brick factory with fencing, clean-up, and rules of conduct? Skateboard<n-line roller -blade courts — develop 53% 27% 20% multi -use court facilities at middle and high school sites? Workingfarm arm — acquire and preserve a working 66% 18% 16% farm with animal equipment,. and crop exhibits? 224 Ratings_ 1+2 3 4+5 Low Medium Hi n Off -road mountain bike trails — develop mountain 54% 31 % 15% bike or single track biking riding areas, trails, and bmx courses? Horse trails — develop horse trails and riding 71 % 21 % 8% areas in the more rural areas of the city? 10.6 Growth management All survey participants were advised that in the next 6 years the Renton population could increase by another 5,000 people (or by approximately 10% more than the existing population of 50,052 persons) as vacant lands are developed for more housing. Survey participants were asked whether there would be enough existing public and private agency park, recreation, and open space (not including any of the above proposals) to provide for this population increase. Approximately 48% of all survey participants indicated the existing supply would not be sufficient, compared with 25% who indicated there would be, and 28% who didn't know. Proiect costs Survey respondents were advised that the existing public and private agency inventory of park, recreation, and open space is estimated to be worth about $2,400 per person or $6,000 per an average single family house. This amount is the cost required to provide additional park facilities for new residents if the city is to maintain the same standards for park, recreation, and open space facilities. Given this fact, the respondents were asked to rate the following methods for dealing with impacts. Ratings 1 +2 3 4+5 nntinn in nrinritV CPf1uence Low Medium High Collect a growth impact fee from new housing development pro►acts - to pay for park improvements within residential neighborhoods? 5% 12% 83% Collect a growth impact fee from new 11 % 17% 73% commercial development projects - to pay for park improvements within commercial areas of the ci . Increase city tax revenues - to acquire and 54% 29% 17% develop park facilities to offset development impacts? Lower standards - for the number of park 69% 23% 6% facilities provided futurepopulations? Growth impact fee amount Survey participants were asked to indicate what amount should be collected (between $6,000 equal to 100 percent of the value and $0 equal to 0 percent of the value) for each new housing unit in the event a growth impact fee were to be collected from new residential developments on the island. ZZO ., A plurality or 69% of all survey participants would approve a fee above $1,500 or 25% of value. If a park growth impact fee were to be collected from 70/6= $6,000 new housing development projects, what amount of 6%= $4,500 this cost would you recommend be charged for every 24°/a. $3,000 new single family house to be developed in the city? 320/6= $1,500 (The city is currently charging $534 for a single family 240/6=—$ 534 house and $376 for a multifamily unit.) 20/6= $ 0 10.7 Real Estate Excise Tax Survey respondents were advised that growth impact fees can not be used to expand or improve park facilities for existing residents. Projects that improve or develop the existing park system that benefit existing residents must be financed by other methods. Respondents were asked flow they would rate the following methods of financing park improvements for existing residents? City Council could assess a variety of optional sales taxes as a means of financing the acquisition and development of additional park, recreation, and open space improvements. How would you rate this option? Ratings 1 +2 3 4+5 REET Low Medium High Real Estate Excise Tax (REET1— an additional 37% 26% 37% 0.25% assessment can be added to the sales Price of all real estate to be dedicated to the acquisition and development of park, recreation, and open space? (Would equal $250 per $100 000 in sales rice. 10.8 General obligation bonds Survey participants were asked how much, if anything, their household would be willing to pay per year for park, recreation, and open space improvements that would benefit existing residents. The mean amount the respondents would pay was $122.98 per year. 10.9 Joint venture opportunities Survey respondents were advised that besides Renton — Moses School District, a variety of nonprofit, and for -profit agencies own and operate park, recreation, and open space within the urban growth area. The respondents were asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 5, the following joint venture opportunities with these agencies. Ratings 1 +2 3 4+5 Joint venture development opportunities with Low Medium Hi h With school districts — for the development of 5% 18% 750/6 playgrounds and athletic fields at school sites for after -school public use? �4-, "V Ratings 1+2 3 4+5 Conclusion In general, the results of the telephone survey indicate resident city voters will support user fees, growth impact fees, real estate excise taxes, general obligation bonds, and joint venture projects if the programs and projects are conceived along the lines indicated in the survey results. 227 17 December 2001 200 telephone surveys Renton Park, Recreation, & Open Space Plan Recri A random sample of resident voter households in Renton were contactea in Novemaer 2001 to participate in a controlled sample survey concerning park, recreation, and open space needs and priorities. 450 households agreed to participate in the survey and were mailed a copy of a summary description of the plan and a copy of the questionnaire. Survey resuTfs were compiled for the first 200 households who completed the surveys by follow-up telephone call - the number, planned for in the original survey scope - of which 48% were male and 53% were female. The resulting survey results are accurate to within 8+/- percent of the opinions of the general population (the statistics are rounded and may not add to 100 percent). The statistics also account for undecided (ranged from 0 to 3% of the total) but do not depict the percents in the tables shown. Following is a summary of the results for the total sample group. ration program priorities 5 Have any household members used recreational 67% yes programs provided by the city, school district, or 33% no another public or private agency in the last ear? What recreational programs do you think should be offered by the city, school district, or another public or private agency on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the least important and 5 is the most important? lowest / highest __.:1 2 3 4 5 6 Before/after school child care/latch key programs? 6% 7% 17% 32% 39% 7 Special populations — all. skills and disabilities? 4% 14% 32% 29% 20% 8 Teen social education activities? 3% 4% 26% 41 % 27% 9 Senior social and health activities? 4% 6% 21 % 43% 27% 10 Aquatic instruction and recreation - all ages? 8% 16% 22% 30% 23% 11 Sailing and kayaking — all ages? 35% 29% 23% 12% 1 % 12 Skiing, hiking, and special events — all ages? 20% 30% 32% 15% 3% 13 Physical conditioning and fitness classes - all ages? 5% 10% 29% 37% 19% 14 Indoor athletic leagues and clinics (non -school) — 5% 9% 34% 35% 17% basketball and volleyball - all ages? 15 Outdoor athletic leagues and clinics (non -school) — 3% 8% 32% 37% 20% baseball softball and soccer - all ages? 16 Self-help classes - finances, health, fashion - all 10% 24% 41 % 19% 6% 17 ages? Arts and crafts instruction - all ages?__ 8% 19% 47% 19% 6% 18 Drama and performing arts instruction - all ages? 13% 17% 41 % 21 % 8% 19 Environmental education and involvement — all ages? 10% 16% 34% 25% 15% 20 Pet trainino and instruction classes — all ages? 29% 34% 27% 8% 2% 21 S ecial events — Renton River Days, Concert Series? 1 3% 5% 24% 36% 32% would you rate the following methods of paying for F � lowest / highest 1 9 R 4 5 22 "ma waaw" if. vM . a .... ........... _ - Reduce the number - of programs to control costs? 21 % 20% 27% 23% 9% 23 Reduce the content, variety, and duration - of 18% 23% 26% 24% 8% programs to control costs? 24 Increase user fees for non-residents — to finance 4% 5% 11 % 31 % 49% 25 ro ram services? Increase user fees for everyone - to finance 10% 16% 36 ° 0% 10% 26 ro ram services? Increase city tax revenues — to finance needed 33% 24% 25% 11 % 8% program services? Facility priorities In general, how would you space facilities provided of park, recreation, and open lowest / highest 1 9 R 4 5 27 Quanti — the number and location of existing park 2% 3% 23% 51 % 22% and trail sites to serve the existing population? 28 Qua li — of maintenance conditions and furnishings 1 % 5% 28% 47% 19% including parking, restrooms, water fountains, and other equipment in existing arks? How would you rate the neei -genera l whether provided by city, school district, or another park provider! lowest / highest 1 7 R d S 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 raunny PIIWI LIWO Wildlife habitat and conservation areas? Working farms with animals and equipment? Community and pea-patchgardens? Historical buildings and museums? Picnic tables and shelters? Power and sailboat lau ching and moorage facilities? Handicap accessible trails within arks? Nature and interpretive trails within arks? Mufti u se hike and bike trails? On -road sidewalks to schools, parks, business districts with trees benches, signs, and amenities? Off -road walking and hiking trails between nei hborhoods arks schools, and other locations? On -road bicycle routes to schools, employment centers business districts — citywide?. Off -road bic cle trails into backcount areas? Kayak and canoe access on Lake Washington? Children's playgrounds and Play areas? Skateboard and roller -blade courts . Rock climbing, mountaineering, and orienteering site? Basketball volleyball, and tennis courts? Soccer fields? Baseball and softball fields? 10% 18% 30% 25% 18% 32% 26% 29% 10% 3% 13% 15% 37% 24% 11 % 7% 18% 45% 23% 90/6 4% 10% 37% 36% 13% 18% 28% 30% 16% 9% 8% 14% 31 % 29% 19% 11 % 17% 34% 27% 11 % 7% 10% 32% 39% 13%° 4% 13% 22% 29% 33% 7% 12% 30% 37% 15% 7% 13% 260/6 34% 21 % 15% 31 % 31 % 14% 9% 18% 27% 34% 15% 7% 26% 10% 28% 8% 25%° 31 % 35% 23% 8% 3% 7% 16% 44% 23% 11 % 9% 17% 37% 2 3/ 14% 7% 151/6 40% 24% 15% 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 lowest / highest 1 9 3 4 5 49 50 51 Golf course and driving ranges. Outdoor aquatics with swimming and leisure Is? Indoor aquatics with swimming and leisurepools? Indoor gym and h sisal —conditioning facilities? Arts and crafts facilities? Communi classrooms and meeting facilities? Performingarts and theater Mal- Da care and child nursery facilities? Teen activity center? Senior activity center? Off -leash et arks? 36% 29% 22% 7% 7% 16% 17% 22% 26% 19% 10% 12% 28% 32% 20% 7% 17% 39% 25% 13% 1561.28% 371a 16% 5% 12% 2 % 39% 21 % 10%° 10% 17% 27% 26% 21% 4% 9% 30% 30% 27% 9% 11 % 30% 37% 14% 33% 23% 19% 14% 13% 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Other ? 19 responses Development plan. proposals Under the proposed park plan the city school district and other nark providers may jointly develop picnic facilities, waterfront parks, trails, playgrounds, recreational courts, athletic fields, gymnasiums, meeting facilities, and other activities within the city. How would you rate the following proposals — as shown on the attached preliminary concept clraphics? lowest / highest 1 2 3 4 5 61 Conservancies environmental — protect important environmental areas of the city including additional new sites along Lake Washington and the Cedar River? 62 1 Conservancies historical — identify historical building: and exhibit interpretive information about the city's historical waterfront, coal mines, downtown business buildings, and other heritage features? Trails stems 1 2 3 4 5 63 e trails — develop a network of off -road 9% 15% 36% 26% 15% hike, bike, and some horse trails connecting neighborhoods to Lake Washington, the Cedar and Green Rivers Cou ar Mountain and regional sites? 64 Rail trail — operate a local recreational trolley for 135%20%20%18% 8% residents and tourists on the existing railroad line from Fort Dent to Port Quendall? 65 Urban sidewalks and gateways —develop major on- 6% 16% 32% 32% 14% road sidewalks with landscaping, street trees, benches, signage, and other amenities between the 66 Walking and hiking trails — develop a networK of on 070 U 7° � %° 00 1 and off -road sidewalks and walking trails with access to schools, arks and other communityfacilities? 67 On -road bicycle routes — develop a system of on -road 10% 11 % 36% 28% 14 bicycle routes providing access to schools, parks, and other community facilities using road shoulders and designated bike lanes along major streets? 3 I lowest / highest 1 2 3 4 5 68 Off -road mountain bike trails — develop mountain bike 25% 29% 31 % 10% 5% or single track biking riding areas, trails, and bmx 69 courses? Horse trails — develop horse trails and riding areas in 42% 29% 21 % 7% 1 % the more rural areas of the ci 70 Water trails — develop access and launch sites for 16% 24% 36% 17% 6% water trails on Lake Washington and the Cedar River for kayaks, canoes, and hand carry boats? 71 Boat tours —license a tour boat concession of the lake 32% 18% 21 % 19%'I 0% and surrounding waterways for residents and tourists during the summer months from Coulon Park? l _..._..L / i.inieC+ WVT 72 nubvul uv Pat no Waterfront access —develop additional waterfront 8% 13% 34% 29% 15% access and swimming beach facilities on Lake Washin ton and the Cedar River? 73 Fishing access — designate additional fishing access 16% 23% 36% 14% 11 % 74 sites on Lake Washington? Power and sailboat launch ramps — develop additional 22% 29% 27% 17% 6% facilities on Lake Washington? 75 Picnic tables -7develop picnic facilities that are easily 6% 14% 30% 34% 16% accessible to all residential neighborhoods? 76 Picnic shelters _ develop picnic shelters or group 6% 13% 37% 32% 11 % picnic facilities at major community ark sites? wrrw. J ...y....... 1 9 3 4 5 77 rtecreauvnal wuI w a..v 1.G.Y.7 Playgrounds — develop a system of playgrounds 8% 12% 29% 32% 18% within a Ih mile radius of all residential areas? 78 Skateboar�n-line roller -blade courts — develop multi- 28% 25% 27% 15% 5% use court facilities at middle and hi h school sites? 79 Basketball courts — develop additional basketball 9% 19% 42% 25% 5% 80 courts at ark sites with groupuse picnic facilities? Volleyball courts — develop additional sand volleyball 12% 26% 40% 19% 3% courts at ark sites with groupuse picnic facilities? Tennis courts— locate and light tennis courts at 12% 18% 40% 24% 6% 81 middle and high school sites for joint student and 82 public use? Youth baseball/softball fields — improve/develop 8% 12% 37% 32% 10% additional baseball fields for younger age players at 83 school and other new park sites? Youth/adult baseball/softball fields — develop 9% 13% 37% 28% 12% additional competition fields for older age youth and 841 adults at new park sites? Soccer fields — improve/develop additional youth and 9% 17% 36% 25% 12% adult soccer fields at school and other new Park sites? �......,�+ / hinhast 4 5 racniues 85 Outdoor aquatics center— develop outdoor swimming 20% 18% 24% 18°!° 21 and leisure pool complex at Cedar River Park? 86 Indoor aquatics center— developindoor swimming15% 14.1 19% 28% 24% 4 and leisure pool complex at Cedar River Park? lowest / highest 1 2 3 4 5 87 Gymnasiums — improve/expand gymnasium and 4% 10% 37% 35% 13% fitness facilities at school sites to provide after school and evening events for youth and adults? 88 Gyms — neighborhood recreation buildings — phase 16% 16% 27% 26% 15% out small neighborhood recreation buildings and �— develop joint use facilities at school sites instead? 89 Gyms - North Highlands Neighborhood Center (16th 17% 15% 29% 23% 13% and Kirkland) — demolish the existing building and develop a new building as a joint park/school facility? 90 Auditoriums stages and large meeting rooms — jointly 7% 15% 29% 28% 22% schedule major meetings and other community events using existing city, school, hotel, and church facilities? 91 Special populations center— develop a facility for 7% 17% 34% 31 % 11 % special needs children at the community building in Liberty Park and/or at a school sites? 92 Teen center— develop an after school or after hours 3% 8% 27% 37% 25% teen activities center at the community building in Liberty Park and/or at middle school sites? 93 Arts center— develop an arts center with instruction 11 % 24% 34% 19% 12% areas, artist studios, galleries, and exhibition space in the community building at Liberty Park? 94 Historical exhibits — develop interpretive exhibits at the 15% 30%° 31 % 15% 8% former Denny Renton (Narco) brick factory and Port Quendall sites? 95 Environmental exhibits — develop interpretive exhibits 14% 24% 28% 26% 9% at coal field, salmon water rechar e, and aquifers? 96 Restrooms — develop additional restroom facilities in 5% 7% 280/6 330/6 27% major community arks throughout the c' IVWW1 ! I sJus 4- 1 2 3 4 5 97 Veterans Memorial — develop a memorial honoring all 15% 19%° 25% 22% 20% war veterans in a downtown oark setting? 98 Renton Square — convert the former car dealership 4% 8% 14% 32% 42% building at Piazza Park into a multipurpose- special events space with room for farmers market, 99 exhibitions and other activities? Renton Green — develop a multipurpose `village 8% 10% 27% 34% 20% green" at the former Denny Renton (Narco) brick yard site across the river from Cedar River Park for soccer 00 playing area kite flying, frisbee ands ecial events? Off -leash dog park — designate an off -leash dog area 32% 25% 21 % 9% 13% at the former Denny Renton (Narco) brick factory with 01 fencin , clean-up, and rules of conduct? Working farm— acquire and preserve a working farm 410 25% 18% 10% 6% with animal, a ui ment and cr exhibits? Growth management In the next 6 years the city's population could increase by another 5,000 people (or by approximately 10% more than the existing population of 50,052 persons) as vacant lands are developed for more housing and annexed to the city. 0 02 In your opinion, will existing (not including any of the 25% yes above proposals) park and recreation facilities within 48% no the city, county, and school district systems be 28% don't know enough to provide for this population increase? The existin inventory of city park and recreational facilities provided within the city is estimated to be worth about $2,400 per person or $6,000 for an average single family house. This amount Is the cost required to provide additional park facilities for Given this fact, how would you rate on parks of new development? nrw...al. ...�.. �..ew,nnf finnnPinn lowest 1 2 methods / highest 3 4 5 03 %a,vnan n,c.nc. ss.. w.......... ...... Lower standards - for the number of park facilities 43% 26% 23% 4% 2% provided future populations? 04 Collect a growth impact fee from new housing 2% 3% 12% 33% 50% development protects - to pay for park improvements within residential neighborhoods? 05 Collect a growth impact fee from new commercial 5% 60/6 17% 30% 43% development protects - to pay for park improvements within commercial areas of the city.? 06 Increase city tax revenues - to acquire and develop 29% 250/6 29% 130/6 4% park facilities to offset develo ment im acts? 07 If a park�growth impact fee were to be collected from 70/o= $6,000 new housing development pro►ects, what amount of 6%= $4,500 this cost would you recommend be charged for every 24%= $3,000 .new single family house to be developed in the W. 32%= $1,500 (The city is currently charging $534 for a single family 24°/= $ 534 house and $376 for a multifamily unit.) 20/o= $ 0 Growth impact fees can not be used to expand or improve park facilities for e= residents. Projects that improve or develop the existing park system that benefit existing residents must be financed by other methods. How would you rate the following methods of financing park improvements for existing residents? Real Estate Excise Tax City Council could assess a variety of optional sales taxes as a means of financing the acquisition and development of additional park, recreation, and open space improvements. How would you rate this option? lowest / highest Optional dedicated taxes 1 2 3 4 5 08 Real Estate Excise Tax (REE77 — an additional 20% 17% 26% 18% 19% 0.25% assessment can be added to the sales price of all real estate to be dedicated to the acquisition and development of park, recreation, and open space? Would equal $250 per $100 000 in sales rice. General obligation bonds City Council could submit a general obligation bond for voter approval as a means of financing the acquisition and development of additional park, recreation, and open space improvements. 7 General obligation bond wmouni per yugir 09 If a bond were to be put on the ballot to finance the $122.98 highest priority proiects listed above, how much, if anything, would your household be willing to pay per year for additional park, recreation, and open space projects that would benefit existing city residents? Joint venture opportunities Besides Renton - the school districts, churches, athletic organizations, and a variety of other public and private agencies own and operate park and recreational facilities within the city's recreational service area. How would you rate joint venture projects with the following agencies? lowest / highest ..�,...w.�.,+ 1 2 3 4 5 10 With school districts — for the development of 2% 3% 18% 35% 40% playgrounds and athletic fields at school sites for after -school public use? 11 With nonprofit organizations — for the conservation 5% 11 % 30% 25% 27% of sensitive environmental areas or the preservation of historical areas or the development of community athletic facilities for public use? 12 With for -profit organizations — for the development 13% 12% 32% 22% 19% of specialized facilities like athletic clubs, swimming Dols, and conference centers? 13 rev 3au1 With school districts — for the operation of after 4% 3% 20% 35% 37% school recreational programs in the school buildings 14 for public use? With nonprofit organizations — for the management 5% - 8% 36% 25% 24% of sensitive environmental areas or the ooperation of after school programs, athletic leagues, or community facilities for public use paid with a fee? 15 With for -profit agencies — for the operation of 13% 12% 35% 18% 20% specialized facilities like athletic clubs, swimming pools, conference centers, and performing theaters for public use paid with a user fee? Resp 11 . _Lawri wai vnueni 16 cI MI MAW! a.wa Which area of the city do you live in? 7% Downtown 23% Kennydale 9% North Highlands 26% Highlands 5% East Highlands 3% Renton Hill 6% West HiIVEarlington 7% Tiffany Park 8% Talbot Hill 5% Maplewood 17 How long have you lived in Renton? 0-1 2-5 6-10 10+ years 0% 20% 14% 66% 18 What type of housing do you live in? Own rent 90% 11 % 0 19 What age group are you in (circle one)? 18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+ 1 1 % 13% 37% 35% 16% Comments 20 Do you have any specific comments or recommendations to make proposed park plan or this survey? 94 responses Please call Jim Shepherd at the Community Services Department at you have any questions about this survey or the park plan process. �7 arch 4, 2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 77 Airport: Security Gate Transportation Division requested authorization to use $50,000 from the Replacement, Fund Airport Security Improvement funds to replace the gates at the Renton Airport Appropriation with electrically operated gates which will provide more security. Refer to TranWortation (Aviation) Committee. Special Assessment District: Utilities Systems Division requested authorization to establish the East East Kennydale Sanitary Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill Phase I Special Assessment District in the Sewer Infill Phase I estimated amount of $857,129.56 to ensure that project costs are equitably distributed to those who benefit. Refer to Utilities Committee. Utility: NE 2nd St Storm Utility Systems Division requested approval to add the NE 2nd St. Storm System Extension Project, Add System Extension project to the Surface Water Utility Divisiods 2002 Capital to 2002 CIP Improvement Program (CIP) and to appropriate $200,000 for the project from the unexpended 2001 CIP fund balance. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORMESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Maurice Crock, Sound Flight, Inc., PO Box Citizen Comment: Crock — i 812, Renton, 98057, urging the City to keep customs service for seaplanes at L'ustoms Service at Airport the Renton Airport. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Carlson — Correspondence was read from Clyde E. Carlson, Northwest Seaplanes, Inc., Customs Service at Airport PO Box 1845, Renton, 98W7, requesting that the City provide the necessary facilities to the United States Customs Service for customs service to be restored at the Renton Airport MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Kotker — Airport Noise Abatement Procedure Changes Citizen Comment: Ha urton — Off -Leash Dog Park, South King County (SeaTac) Correspondence was read from Dave Kotker, 4339 134th Pl. SE, Bellevue, 98006, expressing disappointment that the Renton Airport voluntary noise abatement procedures would not be changed as recommended by the pilots ad hoc advisory committee. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. An electronic letter was read from Mary Hart and Tom Burton, 2508 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056, asking that the Council support an off -leash dog park being considered for South King County in the City of SeaTac. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES CONIlyTITTEE. CARRIED: MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ALSO REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Services Administrator Jim Shepherd clarified that the proposed park would be a King County regional park located in South King County, and the County is seeking a financial commitment from surrounding cities for the park. 4y 6, 2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 164 s� D. Reference: Lighting issue paper — proposed RMC 44-075E.3. Issue: Committee asked if park lights currently purchased meet the regulations as written. Resolution: Parks Director stated that park lights do not meet the standards proposed. Ask for parks, trails, and golf course to be placed in the Exemption section since this would create a hardship and safety hazard to people playing sports. Moved parks line to Exemption section. The following items are recommended to be added to the Title 4 amendment ordinance: 1. RMC 4-4-080 Amendments: Parking Requirements Table 2. Title 4, Chapter 2, Screening 3. Title 4, Chapters 2 and 4, Green River Valley Landscaping 4. Consistency of Residential Zone Lists to Apply Stricter Development Standards, as modified in Committee (see A. on previous page) 5. Title 4, Chapter 10, Nonconforming Uses, as modified in Committee (see B. and C. on previous page) 6. Title 4, Chapter 2, Effective Date of Regulations 7. Title 4, Chapter 2, Setbacks 8. Title 4, Chapter 4, Lighting Standards (see D. above) The amendments pertaining to Title 6 (Police Regulations) of the Renton Municipal Code have been separated from the overall Title 4 ordinance for reporting purposes. The Committee further recommended that both the Title 4 ordinance and the companion Title 6 ordinance be presented for fust reading. MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Corman commended the Committee for all of their work on this matter. *MOTION CARRIED. (See page 166 for ordinances.) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report regarding the Parkway Utility: Parkway Townhomes Townhomes water quality. The Committee was briefed on the issue and Water Quality recommended that no action be taken at this time. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services 'Committee mmunity Services: Off - Leash Dog Park, -South King County (SeaTac) Community Services Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the proposed South King County off -leash dog park. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation that the City of Renton continue -participating on the South King County Task Force for the development of the South King County off -leash area dog park. The Committee further recommended that the City not commit funding for the development, maintenance and operations of the South King County off -leash area dog park at this time. Since there is currently no consideration to place an. off -leash facility within City limits, the Committee further recommended that this item be removed from the Public Safety Committee at this time. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 6, 2002 APPRO-IfCD BY WVCOUNCIL • i _ Date r The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in. the staff recommendation that the City of Renton continues participating on the South King County Task.Force for the development of the South King County 'Off Leash Area.Dog, Park. The Committee further recommends that th Ci does not commit funding4or the . development, maintenance and o King County Off Leash Area Dog Park_ of fiis.- MC1 Since there is currently. nsl_ to place - s cility within city limits, the Committee further r "n that this item be r m the Public Safety Committee at this time: Rrndy Gorman; Chairly ' Dan Clawson, Vice -Chair Don Persson, Member Cc: Jim Shepherd Leslie Bedach Terry Flatley CAWIN00WS\TEMP%20024)68mb (Ver 1Off Leash Comm Rpt).doc Daniel Clawson - Off -leash do areas b Pa e 1 From: <Thomshar@aol.com> To: <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2003 8:08 PM Subject: Off -leash dog areas Dear Councilmember Clawson: I would appreciate your support in establishing off -leash dog parks in the city of Renton. I am a resident of Seattle, barely within the city limits, and Renton is closer for than the dog parks in Seattle. 1 would love to see dog parks in Renton that are larger than those in Seattle. The Seattle dog parks suffer greatly from overuse, and establishing parks of adequate size would help to limit damage from overuse. I now walk my dog on -leash at several Renton parks, usually 3-4 times per week. I would love to take my dog to a park where dogs are welcomed rather than tolerated. I feel it is important for my dog to socialize with other dogs, and I enjoy socializing with dog owners. Please support off -leash dog parks in the City of Renton. Sincerely, Shari Blevins CC: <elynnc@earthlink.net> From: Daniel Clawson To: Thomshar@aol.com Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:01 AM Subject: Re: Off -leash dog areas Dear Ms. Blevins, Thank you for your comment. This evening I will ask the Council to refer the matter to committee for review and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> <Thomshar@aol.com> 04/02/03 20:08 PM >>> Dear Councilmember Clawson: I would appreciate your support in establishing off -leash dog parks in the city of Renton. I am a resident of Seattle, barely within the city limits, and Renton is closer for me than the dog parks in Seattle. I would love to see dog parks in Renton that are larger than those in Seattle. The Seattle dog parks suffer greatly from overuse, and establishing parks of adequate size would help to limit damage from overuse. I now walk my dog on -leash at several Renton parks, usually 3-4 times per week. I would love to take my dog to a park where dogs are welcomed rather than tolerated. I feel it is important for my dog to socialize with other dogs, and I enjoy socializing with dog owners. Please support off -leash dog parks in the City of Renton. Sincerely, Shari Blevins CC: council@ ci.renton.wa.us Daniel Clawson - off leash do arks Pa e 1 L From: "nancy prater" <nlprater@msn.com> To: <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Sun, Mar 30, 2003 8:39 AM Subject: off leash dog parks Dear Councilmember Clawson: I am writing to ask your support for off -leash dog parks in the city of Renton. I would use an off -leash park at least 5 times per week. The closest park for us now is in Columbia City. As dogs are not allowed in so many of Renton parks I think this is a very important subject. I feel that providing a legal place for dogs to run off leash encourages responsible dog ownership and limits off -leash dogs in areas where they are not permitted. It also reduces conflicts between users of our park resources. An off -leash park provides not only dogs a place to exercise and socialize, but just as importantly it provides their owners a place to socialize with others who have a common interest. Please support off -leash dog parks in the city of Renton. Thank you. Bob and Nancy Prater 412 Pelly Ave n. Renton 98055 nlprater@msn.com Daniel Clawson --Interest in Off -Lead P: Page 1 Y From: "T.A. White" <docdive2000@hotmail.com> To: <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Sat, Mar 29, 2003 12:53 PM Subject: Interest in Off -Lead Park Dear Councilmember Clawson: It was good meeting you at the Renton Highlands Community Association meeting last Wednesday and I appreciate the opportunity to formally register my strong support of off -leash areas (OLAs) in Renton. As a resident of Renton, I would use OLAs 5-7 times per week. I feel that providing a legal place for dogs to run off leash encourages responsible dog ownership and limits off -leash dogs in areas where they are not permitted. It also reduces conflicts between users of our park resources. Off -leash areas provides not only dogs a place to exercise and socialize, but just an importantly it provides their owners a place to socialize with other who have a common interest. This is an issue not just for the City of Renton, but for all of western Washington and I really appreciate your willingness to look into this issue and promote it with the other members of the Renton City Council. Importantly, although it is important to be thorough and deliberate during the planning process, there is no need to unnecessarily re -invent the wheel. The City of Seattle, in cooperation with Citizens for Off -Lead Areas (COLA) have established many OLAs in Seattle and can serve as a template to facilitate processes within Renton. Seattle has shown that OLAs are not difficult to establish as long as vision and leadership is present. appreciate your contribution in both of these areas. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance with respect to information regarding OLAs or other planning issues that might arise. KDOGS will be happy to provide additional technical support should you require it. Thanks for your consideration of this important issue for the citizens of Renton. Dr. Timothy A. White 12940 SE 185th St. Renton, WA 98058 MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Daniel_Clawson - Off Leash Do Parks I 3nton Pa e 1 From: "Julie Hiatt" <juliehiatt@gloful.com> To: <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Sat, Mar 29, 2003 11:41 AM Subject: Off Leash Dog Parks In Renton Dear Council member Clawson: I am writing to ask your support for off -leash dog parks in the city of Renton. As a resident of Renton, I would use an off -leash park 2-3 times per week. I feel that providing a legal place for dogs to run off leash encourages responsible dog ownership and limits off -leash dogs in areas where they are not permitted. It also reduces conflicts between users of our parks resources. An off -leash park provides not only dogs a place to exercise and socialize, but just as importantly it provides their owners a place to socialize with other who have a common interest. Please support off -leash dog parks in the City of Renton. Thank you, Julie Hiatt 1726 Pierce Ave SE Renton, WA 98158 Julia Medzegian - Fwd: Su ort off -leas'- Io arks Pa e 1 From: Kathy Wheeler CITY OF RENTON To: Julia Medzegian Date: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 8:14:05 AM APR 0 8 2003 Subject: Fwd: Support off -leash dog parks CEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE >>> "Julie Hiatt" <juliehiatt@gloful.com> 7/29/02 8:57:06 AM >>> Dear Council President Pro -Tern -Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, This message is to thank you for your support for the proposed South County off -leash recreation area at Grandview Park. Please know that the Renton voters in over 6,000 households need you to ensure that the Grandview Off -leash Park is completed. The owners of the approximately 10,000 dogs in our city have NO place to legally exercise or enjoy dog recreation with other dog owners. We need and expect your continued help. Sincerely, Julie Hiatt 1726 Pierce Ave SE Renton, WA 98134 aaffvo ./. J412w,wl 91?4?11 Daniel Clawson - RE: Off Leash Park Page 1 From: "Parker, Evelyn C" <evelyn.c.parker@boeing.com> To: "Daniel Clawson" <dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2003 2:47 PM Subject: RE: Off Leash Park Thanks for the reply! Ev, Thanks, Evelyn G. Parker OU Administration - Distributed Operations Center Production Services - Information Technology Services (206) 854-9856 (206) 797-7890 Pager "Embrace change. It's going to happen whether you like it or not." - Odette Pollar -----Original Message ----- From: Daniel Clawson [mailto:dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 8:42 AM To: Parker, Evelyn C Subject: Re: Off Leash Park Dear Ms. Parker, Thank you for your message. There is a lot of interest in the Narco site as we call it. The City Council will be discussing possible sites in the future, and we will inform you of any meeting that you could attend. Dan Clawson >>> "Parker, Evelyn C" <evelyn.c.parker@boeing.com> 04/08/03 08:16 AM Dan, I am one of the many residents of Renton and own a dog that could really use a special area to be allowed to go play. We are trying to be fair to both citizens and the dogs. Please help us get an off leash area approved for the Renton area. I run along the Cedar River Trail and have noticed a possible area across the river behind Carco Theater right along the trail. Could that be a possible consideration for space? Thanks for letting us know that not everyone on the council is against an off leash area. Sincerely, Ev Thanks, Evelyn C. Parker OU Administration - Distributed Operations Center Production Services - Information Technology Services (206) 854-9856 Daniel Clawson - RE: Off Leash Park _ Page-- _ (206) 797-7890 Pager "Embrace change. It's going to happen whether you like it or not." - Odette Pollar Daniel Clawson - Re: Off lease PARK it -NTON a Page 1 F CITY OF RENTU4 From: Daniel Clawson To: Jennifer.Garl@VerizonWireless.com APR 0 8 2003 Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:11 AM RECEIVED Subject: Re: Off lease PARK in RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thank you for your comments. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> "Gad, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Gad@VerizonWireless.com> 03/28/03 06:32 AM >>> Hello, Thank you for considering a off lease park in Renton. I would very much like to see this come together. Thank you and have a great weekend. Jennifer Garl Daniel Clawson - Re: Off leash do ar' From: Daniel Clawson To: TAngevi@rei.com Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:10 AM Subject: Re: Off leash dog park CITY OF RENTON APR 0 8 2003 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thank you for your comments. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> 'Terry Angevine" <TAngevi@rei.com> 03/28/03 07:48 AM >>> Greetings, My name is Terry Angevine and I live in downtown Renton on Burnett Ave N. I would love to see an off leash park in Renton. Currently, we have a pretty extensive drive to get to a location which allows our dog to run freely. At over 100 Ibs, it can be difficult to get him the exercise and socialization he needs on a regular basis. Thank you for taking an off -leash park for the residents of Renton (human and canine) into consideration. Regards, Terry Angevine Daniel Clawson - Re: off leash ark Page 1 CITY OF RENTON From: Daniel Clawson To: RGriffith@costco.com APR 0 8 2003 Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:09 AM RECEIVED Subject: Re: off leash park CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thank you for your comments. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> Roneida Griffith <RGriffith@costco.com> 03/28/03 12:11 PM >>> Hi, My family is in the Renton area and we are writing in concerns for an off leash dog park. This would be beneficial to the area, what a great way for the whole family to spend the day together, my daughter loves watching the dogs play and currently we have to go all the way to Redmond. Needing a dog park in Renton, thanks for listening. The Griffith family Daniel Clawson - Re: off leash do ar' Page 1 From: Daniel Clawson CITY OF RENTO.N To: bullymama@yahoo.com Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:06 AM APR 0 8 2003 Subject: Re: off leash dog park RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Ms. Dodge, Thanks for your comment. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> vicki dodge <bullymama@yahoo.com> 03/28/03 15:54 PM >>> Please consider an off leash dog park in Renton or Kent. Sincerely, Vicki Dodge Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com From: Daniel Clawson To: Council@ci.renton.wa.us Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:05 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Want an off leash park in Renton? (From Main Council Email Mailbox) Hello Chris, Thanks for your comments. I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action this evening. Dan Clawson >>> Council Via Clerk 03/29/03 19:27 PM >>> The attached message has been received in the main Council email mailbox at council@ci.renton.wa.us, and is being automatically forwarded to each Councilmember and the Council Liaison. If the attached message is correspondence from a citizen addressed to more than one, or all of Council, it will be acknowledged and processed by the City Clerk in accordance with Policy and Procedure #800-04. Daniel dClawson - Re: Want an off leash -k in Renton? Page 1 c C17y OF REN7ON From: Daniel Clawson APR 0 To: Slinging6strings@wmconnect.com 8 2003 Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:08 AM RLI:�Ct~1VEO Subject: Re: Want an off leash park in Renton? CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thank you for your comment. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> <Slinging6strings@wmconnect.com> 03/28/03 13:31 PM >>> I am going to be buying a house wanted to move to Kent but since Kent won't do the off leash dog park and Renton is considering I may be buying our house in Renton? Is this park important to me? yes very. It is our favorite thing to do for us!!! Not only for the dogs when my family comes up from North Dakota that is where they always want to go to the off leash park in marymoore which is way far to drive. thank you. Daniel Clawson - Re: off -leash dog par,'- \ Pa e 1 4 J* CITY OF RENTON From: Daniel Clawson APR 0 8 F03 To: VMurphy@costco.com Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2003 9:10 AM RECEIVED Subject: Re: off -leash dog park CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thank you for your comments. This evening I will ask the Council to refer this matter to committee for study and possible action. Dan Clawson >>> Vicki Murphy <VMurphy@costco.com> 03/28/03 11:30 AM >>> An off -leash dog park would be a great thing to have in Renton. Vicki Murphy APPROVEM BY CrVV COUNCil. ®ate '/-7- a003 ; COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 Tracking Restrictive Covenants (Referred March 20, 2000) Development Services Division provided information to the Planning and Development Committee regarding the tracking of restrictive covenants required through the permit process. The Committee in turn requested a similar briefing for Committee of the. Whole. Until a few years ago covenants restricting ,the 21evelopment of property were difficult to track. Staff generally did not know if any restrict v coverants affected—, "property unless a title report was for applicants'and,,are only required for certain types of land use provided. Title reports are expensive applications. k At the end of 1999, staff con plete&4- project cataloging and mAppmg'=a&of the restrictive covenants required by the City. Stafffcan now2research the covenants by consulting a map to identify affected properties. A corresponding database zprovides the reco`rduig number, of the restrictive covenant, a legal description of the subjct property, and a uplmary of the requnrelnent of the covenants. &, In addition; the Permits Phis permit tracking system is :'utilized to document conditions of permit approval, including covenant$. These conditions can be " earclied by project name, address or parcel identification number. Another toot developed by staff fto {rack project conditions is a matrix summarizing the required conditions Copies �of; this matrix are distifibuted to the contractors and inspectors at pre -construction meetings A r x The Committee recommends .no further action be taken at this ii ne. Kathy eolker-Wheeler, Council President cc: Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Restrictive Covenants.rpt\ rev 01/02 bh APM.0Vc-D By CiTy COUNCIL ' Date V % aU0-4 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 2003 CDBG Amounts/Participation in the Housing Stability Program (Referred March 24, 2003) The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the Human Services Advisory Committee's recommendation that the City of Renton. continue to participate in the Community Development Block. Grant (CDBG),Consortium Housing Stability Program in 2003. This program helps low to moddite income famYlies who are employed, who have had a temporary crisis in their lives„wluehr..esultsm the short tetra inability to meet their rent or mortgage payment. The Renton Housing Stability Program cost of $21,355'lfor 2003 will be deducted from the public. services amount re'ceivedj& Renton �lerthe Joint A e6ment with King County. . Due to the increase in the..amount of C�3BCrfunding,Renton�,will receive in 2003, funding this program will not decrease thMarrounif2003 !agency "fundmgfor pblic services previously approved by Council. elson, , Vice Chair Randy Corman, Member C: Karen Bergsvik HousingStabitity. rpt\ Rev 01/02 bh APPRIOVED By COTY COUNCIL s Data --�% a�03 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 The Community Services .Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to execute a formal 36 (thirty-six) month lease/purchase agreement with Club Car; Inca for forty (40) gasoline powered golf carts. Forty (40) carts from the current fleet will be utilized as a trade-in The,6ty,' "a- k the,option at the end of the term to purchase the forty (40) carts for $1 00 Beach ;The City's ctarrent fleet has a total of fifty (50) golf carts'. � The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and CityCler.`k be authorized to execute this Lease/Purchase A Bement , F Fg � S p e To son. King ParTcer, Vice -Chair R dy Cormanember CC: Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Leslie Betlach, Parks Director Kelly Beymer, Maplewood Golf Course Manager TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 Sidewalk Utility Markings (Referred June 10, 2002) APPROVED BY .I CITY COUNCIL Date The Transportation/Aviation Committee has discussed the problem of the unsightliness of utility locate marks left on sidewalks after construction activity has been completed. In several cases these locate markings are left on new city sidewalks and can take considerable time to wear away. The Transportation/Aviation Committee has requested staff to develop a program to implement the removal of utility locate markings in the downtown core. area as a pilot program. Removal of locate marks would be limited to sidewalks only. The permitee will be required to remove utility locate marks on sidewalks within the Downtown Core area, as shown in Appendix B of the 2002 City of Renton Zoning Map. The permitee shall remove the utility locate marks on sidewalks within fourteen 14 days of job completion. The Transportation/Aviation Committee recorn ends i16, enting code changes requiring the removal of utility locate marks $On 'sidewalks,_..within the -Downtown Core Area and adopt Resolution authorizing same. Therresolution to -enact these codachanges will be submitted to Council at a later meeting',V .: The Transportation/Aviation Committee'furtherecbmmends that Committee after one year on ,,the e#fedtiveness of this pilot recommendations to modify orimprove thnVlt,,-,s rem oval ;t r Don Persson, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice air /n_,-Mentbdr� ��Mii} 1.+��Iy�J� S � ♦ T'{'I T�t'� C: Neil Watts Jan Illian x�eolA Gu,�i�►u�� report back to the am, including any APPROVED Di( CiTy COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT Date �- aoo3 April 7, 2003 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS 2 wire transfers, totaling $2,063,530.77, and 569 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 43498-43733, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $1,708,408.59. King Parker, Don Persson, Member PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 Maximum Residential Fence Height Regulations (Referred March,18, 2002) APPROVED BY � CITY COUNCIL, i Date _: 7 aoo3 The Planning and Development. Committee met to review and discuss potential revisions to the maximum residential fence height regulations established in Title I.Y. Currently, City code limits the height of residential fences to a maximum of four feet when located adjacent to a public street. The Planning and Development Committee met in April to discuss possible changes to the fence height' regulations. The Committee recommended that a public hearing be conducted, which occurred on May 6, 2002. Cominittee members subsequently toured several residential neighborhoods in November and directed staff to address setback, landscaping and fencing material requirements. On January 10, 2003 the City Ad-brney'�s-Offic. advised C�ry)taff and the City Council that the proposed' fence regulations were too Tpoh -Iori& t&Ala Aspo 'se tom' the City Attorney's comments, staff revised the proposed fence>regulations to include more regulaf(,%, language. The revised. fence standards would allow resi eats , to, apply fora Special Adhifn skratile Fence . Permit in order to construct-6-foot high fencesiwheii ocatedm tl� a,'f ,t"krd or side yard�along-a street setback. The permits would be issued cep a case -by casebasxs Vr tddd` the applican demonstrates the fence is constructed with appropriate fencing math J the. encexis sufficientl. er Eened; and, the finished side of the fence is oriented toward the sireetscape � 0, s ;a t . Terri Brier , Chaim cc: Gregg Zimmerman . Neil Watts _' J _ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE fence height report #4.doc\ Rev 01/02 bh CITY OF RENTON, WASIINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 & 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. AT SOUTHPORT BLVD., AND OF SOUTHPORT BLVD., FOR A PERIOD OF THREE DAYS (CONSECUTIVE OR NON- CONSECUTIVE) BETWEEN MAY 1 AND MAY 29, 2003, FOR BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS AT BOTH LOCATIONS. WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company (BNSF) has entered into agreements with the City of Renton to replace deteriorated railroad grade crossings at two locations in the City; and WHEREAS, to facilitate this construction and allow for safe condition for both vehicles and pedestrians it is necessary to do this work under temporary street closures; and WHEREAS, BNSF has requested a two-day full road closure of the Lake Washington Blvd. crossing, and a one -day full road closure of the Southport Blvd. crossing (south entrance to Southport (SECO) Development and Gene Coulon Park); and WHEREAS, these temporary full road closures will take place between May 1 and May 29, 2003; and WHEREAS, these temporary street closures will not occur concurrently; and WHEREAS, there will be no Monday, Friday or weekend street closures allowed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code section 9-9-3 the City Council is to authorize such closures by means of a Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The City Council does hereby authorize the temporary closure of Lake Washington Blvd. at Southport Blvd., and of Southport Blvd., for a period of three days (consecutive or non-consecutive) between May 1 and May 29, 2003, to be ezLnded upon weather contingencies, for the BNSF project upgrading City railroad crossings. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.971:3/19/03:ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2003. 2003. 2 AP- PROVED, BY CiTO V COUNCIL Date V -7 aDD3 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT April 7, 2003 Pavilion Renovation (March 24, 2003) The Committee of the Whole concurs with the Administration's recommendation to complete the renovation of the Pavilion according to the final design which includes an under floor plenum, glass curtain walls on the East and West ends of the building, and air-conditioning. The Committee recommends that the City Council authorize the Administration to expend the previously appropriated $2,300,000. The Administration will return on April 21, 2003 for Council authorization to include the air-conditioning option once the funds are identified to cover the remaining project cost ($292,112.81). The Committee of the Whole further recommends awarding the construction contract to Edifice Construction Company in the amount of $2,592,112.81. The Administration will find savings from capital funds or one-time moneys and from areas that will not impact delivery of essential City services. Kathy K olker-Wheeler, Council President cc: Jay Covington Jim Shepherd Dennis Culp Vja&u - Rc AA&l COW Pavilion committee report REV l.doc\ rev 01/02 bh