Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil 12/08/2003AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL *REVISED* REGULAR MEETING December 8, 2003 Monday, 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 4. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) Y 1 When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 5. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 1, 2003. Council concur. b. Mayor Tanner reappoints Jeremy Chambers, 15823 130th Pl. SE, Renton, 98055; Edythe Gandy, 3807 NE 8th Ct., Renton, 98056; Nancy Hoben, 17434 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058; and Eleanor Simpson, 418 Wells Ave. N., Renton, 98055; each to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three year term expiring 12/31/2006. Council concur. c. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of dedication of right-of-way at the corner of NE 38th St. and Lincoln Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement for the Elsa Ridge Short Plat (SHP-02-086). Council concur. d. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends approval of an agreement with King County pertaining to the use of Substitute House Bill 2060 local low-income housing funds and the establishment of the Regional Affordable Housing Program. Refer to Community Services Committee. e. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Maplewood Highlands Annexation, 10.88 acres bounded by 144th Ave. SE on the west, NE 2nd St. on the north, and Lyons Ave. NE on the east, and recommends that a public meeting be set on 12/22/2003 to consider the petition. Council concur. f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Merritt II Annexation, 20.59 acres bounded by Lyons Ave. NE on the east, SE 100th St., if extended, on the south, and 142nd Ave. SE, if extended, on the west, and recommends that a public meeting be set on 12/22/2003 to consider the petition. Council concur. g. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation to accept a grant in the amount of $40,986 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See 8.a. for resolution.) h. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with King County Department of Transportation to provide Commute Trip Reduction services to affected employers in the City of Renton for 2003-2004. Contract amount is $39,332. Council concur. (See 8.b. for resolution.) (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 6. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Virginia M. Hill, 2115 Smithers Ave. S., Renton, 98055, asking the City to find a solution to the ongoing storm water drainage problems in her neighborhood. 7. OLD BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Ad Hoc Council Communications Committee: E-Mail and Council Correspondence Policies b. Committee of the Whole: Budget Ordinances* c. Finance Committee: 2003 Budget Adjustment Ordinance*; Maplewood Golf Course Fees (Hicks Correspondence) d. Transportation Committee: SR-169 Improved Safety & Capacity*; Temporary Parking Permits for Extended Services e. Utilities Committee: Skyway Water & Sewer District Boundary Agreement* 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Resolutions: a. WSDOT grant for Commute Trip Reduction program (see 5.g.) b. Agreement with King County for Commute Trip Reduction services (see 5.h.) c. Encouraging safety and capacity improvements on the SR-169 corridor (see 7.d.) d. Skyway Water & Sewer District Boundary Agreement (see 7.e.) Ordinances for first reading: a. 2003 year-end Budget adjustments (see 7.c.) b. 2004 annual City of Renton Budget (see 7.b.) c. 2004 athletic field lights fees (see 7.b.) d. 2004 Gene Coulon Park boat launch fees (see 7.b.) e. Henry Moses Aquatic Center admission fees (see 7.b.) f. 2004 Community Center fees (see 7.b.) g. 2004 Gene Coulon Park picnic shelter fees (see 7.b.) h. Insurance Healthcare Fund establishment (see 7.b.) i. Dalpay property rezone from R-8 to CN (Council approved 11/24/2003) j. Dalpay property rezone from R-8 to R-10 (Council approved 11/24/2003) k. Merlino property rezone from RM-I to R-10 (Council approved 11/24/2003). 9. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 10. AUDIENCE COMMENT 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Budget Deliberations and Wrap -Up; Council Electronic Mail and Correspondence Policies • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 8, 2003 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; KING PARKER; TERRI BRIERE. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; VICTORIA RUNKLE, Finance and Information Services Administrator; ELAINE GREGORY, Fiscal Services Director; SYLVIA DOERSCHEL, Finance Analyst Supervisor; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: • The Wal-Mart Foundation made a $1,000 donation to the Housing Repair Assistance Program for the purchase of smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be installed in the homes of clients. • The Renton Youth Health Center, formerly the Renton Teen Health Center, plans to reopen in December. King County restored the Center's 2004 funding, thereby allowing the operation of the two school -linked health centers in Burien/Highline and Renton. • King County's Renton Transfer Station, located at 3021 NE 4th St., reopened for service to the public on November 24. Hours of operation are Monday through Sunday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 1, 2003. Council concur. December 1, 2003 Appointment: Municipal Arts Mayor Tanner reappointed Jeremy Chambers, 15823 130th Pl. SE, Renton, Commission 98055; Edythe Gandy, 3807 NE 8th Ct., Renton, 98056; Nancy Hoben, 17434 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058; and Eleanor Simpson, 418 Wells Ave. N., Renton, 98055; each to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three year term expiring 12/31/2006. Council concur. Development Services: Elsa Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of Ridge Short Plat, ROW additional right-of-way for a 15-foot radius at the corner of NE 38th St. and Dedication at NE 38th St & Lincoln Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Elsa Ridge Short Plat (SHP-02- Lincoln Ave NE 086). Council concur. December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 453 W EDNSP: Regional Affordable Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic planning Department Housing Program (SHB 2060 recommended approval of an agreement with King County pertaining to the use Funds), King County of Substitute House Bill 2060 local low-income housing funds and the establishment of the Regional Affordable Housing Program. Refer to Community Services Committee. Annexation: Maplewood Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Highlands, 144th Ave SE submitted 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Maplewood Highlands Annexation, 10.88 acres bounded by 144th Ave. SE on the west, NE 2nd St. on the north, and Lyons Ave. NE on the east, and recommended that a public meeting be set on 12/22/2003 to consider the petition. Council concur. Annexation: Merritt H, Lyons Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave NE submitted 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Merritt II Annexation, 20.59 acres bounded by Lyons Ave. NE on the east, SE 100th St., if extended, on the south, and 142nd Ave. SE, if extended, on the west, and recommended that a public meeting be set on 12/22/2003 to consider the petition. Council concur. Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with Reduction Program Grant, Washington State Department of Transportation to accept a grant in the amount WSDOT of $40,986 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See page 456 for resolution.) Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with Reduction Program Services, King County Department of Transportation to provide Commute Trip King County Reduction services to affected employers in the City of Renton for 2003-2004. Contract amount is $39,332. Council concur. (See page 456 for resolution.) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Virginia M. Hill, 2115 Smithers Ave. S., Renton, 98055, Citizen Comment: Hill - asking the City to find a solution to the ongoing stormwater drainage problems Stormwater Drainage in her neighborhood. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY Problems CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee of the Whole report Committee of the Whole regarding the adoption of the 2004 City of Renton Budget, making amendments Budget: 2004 Annual City of as recommended by the Council, and recommending fee increases for various Renton & Related Ordinances parks and recreational programs. The Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance approving the 2004 Budget in the amount of $146,500,500. This recommendation decreases the Mayor's proposed budget by $2.2 million for the appropriation of monies received from King County as mitigation for the changes at the Wastewater Treatment Plant located in Renton. The Council will discuss the use of these monies at their Council retreat in January, and the final appropriation of these monies will be made in a future ordinance. The 2004 Budget also appropriates a $1.5 million transfer from Fund 301, Parking Garage Construction Fund, to Fund 317, Transportation Capital Improvements Fund, for the purpose of paying for street and other transportation planning efforts in Phase I of the Boeing redevelopment area. The $1.5 million must then also be legally appropriated in Fund 317 to permit actual expenditures. December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 454 The Committee also recommended that the $95,000 currently appropriated in Fund 316 as Narco Park Planning now be appropriated and reserved as Parks Contingency Reserve. The Committee further recommended the 2004 Budget create a new fund entitled "Insurance Healthcare Fund." This fund will account for all revenues, paid premiums and expenditures the City has for health care costs. The Committee also recommended adoption of the ordinance that increases the 2004 athletic field light fees between $2 and $3 per hour depending upon the user. The Committee concurred that the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park picnic shelter and boat launch fees also be increased as presented by the Community Services Department. The Committee also adopted the recommendation that damage and after hours fees be increased at the Renton Community Center. Finally, the Committee recommended adoption of the fees for the new Henry Moses Aquatic Center as presented. These fees will have a price differential for resident and non-resident users. Further, staff will explore admitting non - swimming parents into the facility free of charge to supervise their children during non -peak hours. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See pages 456 & 457 for ordinances.) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending Utility: Skyway Water & concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Sewer District Boundary Department to approve the interlocal agreement with Skyway Water and Sewer Agreement District identifying the boundaries where each agency is responsible to provide water and sanitary sewer service. The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 456 for resolution.) Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding temporary parking permits for extended services in the Central Transportation: Temporary Business District. Available parking is limited in the City's downtown core. Parking Permits for Extended Consequently, the City established time restrictions on parking in this area. Services These parking restrictions range from one to two hours, with the majority of parking being two hours. These time restrictions provide good turn around of the limited parking spaces while allowing sufficient time for most customers to conduct their business. The City recently constructed a parking garage in the Central Business District to accommodate those that need additional time in the core area for long-term parking. Allowing selected businesses the privilege of three-hour parking would make it difficult to deny requests from other businesses in the core area asking for the same privilege. A proliferation of three-hour parking could have the potential of harming many of the downtown businesses that depend on the parking turnover to assure the vitality of their businesses. The Committee recommended Council maintain the established parking restrictions in the December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 455 Central Business District. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: SR-169 Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Corridor Safety & Capacity recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt a resolution Improvements, Supporting encouraging funding of the SR-169 (Maple Valley Hwy.) Corridor Study, and Resolution reclassifying the full length of SR-169 to be part of King County's regional arterial network. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 456 for resolution.) Transportation: SR-169, MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER Classification as Highway of THE SUBJECT OF CLASSIFYING SR-169 AS A HIGHWAY OF Statewide Significance STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Hicks Community Services: correspondence, referred to the Committee on October 27, 2003, concerning the Maplewood Golf Course Fees, fees at Maplewood Golf Course. The Committee recommended concurrence in Hicks the staff recommendation that the summer, winter, and off-peak fee structures currently in place at Maplewood Golf Course be continued, as they are more beneficial to a wider range of customers. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Budget: 2003 Year -End Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending adoption of Adjustments the 2003 Year -End Budget Adjustment Ordinance, which appropriates funds from fund balance and new revenue, increasing 2003 expenditures in various funds and departments. This ordinance will increase the 2003 Budget by $9,176,407. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 456 for ordinance.) Ad Hoc Council Ad Hoc Council Communications Committee Chair Briere presented a report Communications Committee regarding the new Council e-mail policy and revised Council correspondence Council: Electronic Mail & and agenda policy. After countless drafts were reviewed during eleven Correspondence Policies meetings of the Ad Hoc Council Communications Committee in the previous nine months, the Committee recommended adoption of new Council Policy and Procedure #800-11 entitled "Council E-Mail," for the purpose of facilitating e- mail communications between and among Councilmembers, City staff, citizens, and others. This policy establishes procedures for retention of e-mail messages in compliance with the Public Records Disclosure Act, and assists Councilmembers in complying with the Open Public Meetings Act and other applicable laws. The Committee also recommended adoption of revisions to the existing Council Correspondence and Agenda Policy #800-04, to update the policy and to include e-mail correspondence. This policy establishes guidelines and procedures for correspondence addressed to the City Council, and for the preparation of the Council meeting agenda. The Committee further recommended that the Council President be authorized to sign the two policy and procedure documents. By approval of this December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 456 Committee report, Council agreed that the Ad Hoc Council Communications Committee's assignment is complete. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Council President Keolker-Wheeler thanked the Committee members and City staff for the time they spent on updating the existing Council correspondence policy and on creating the new e-mail policy. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3672 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Reduction Program Grant, Transportation entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Implementation." MOVED WSDOT BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3673 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Program Services, Reduction Act Implementation Agreement." MOVED BY CORMAN, King County SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3674 A resolution was read encouraging the Washington State Legislature, the Transportation: SR-169 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), King County, and Corridor Safety & Capacity affected jurisdictions to join in working to improve safety and capacity on the Improvements, Supporting SR-169 corridor (Maple Valley Hwy.). MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED Resolution BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3675 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: Skyway Water & interlocal cooperative agreement with the Skyway Water and Sewer District to Sewer District Boundary modify the interlocal agreements between the City and Skyway Water and Agreement Sewer District related to the establishment of services boundaries. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 12/15/2003 for second and final reading: Budget: 2003 Year -End An ordinance was read providing for the 2003 year-end Budget adjustments in Adjustments the total amount of $9,176,407. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Budget: 2004 Annual City of An ordinance was read adopting the annual City of Renton Budget for the year Renton 2004 in the total amount of $146,500,500. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Community. Services: Athletic An ordinance was read increasing the 2004 athletic field light fees. MOVED Field Light Fees BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 457 Community Services: Gene An ordinance was read increasing the 2004 boat launch fees at Gene Coulon Coulon Park Boat Launch Fees Memorial Beach Park. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Community Services: Henry An ordinance was read amending Chapter 5-1, Fee Schedule of Title V Moses Aquatic Center Fees (Finance and Business Regulations) of City Code by setting the admission fees for the Henry Moses Aquatic Center. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Community Services: An ordinance was read increasing the 2004 Renton Community Center damage Community Center Fees deposit and after hours fees. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Community Services: Gene An ordinance was read increasing the 2004 picnic shelter fees at Gene Coulon Coulon Park Picnic Shelter Memorial Beach Park. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, Fees COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Finance: Insurance Healthcare An ordinance was read creating a new fund entitled "Insurance Healthcare Fund Fund" for the year 2004. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Rezone: Dalpay Property, NE An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property 12th St, R-8 to CN (R-02-139) consisting of 2.32 acres located on the 3800 and 3900 blocks of NE 12th St. beginning 126 feet north of the public right-of-way from Residential - eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Center Neighborhood (CN) zoning; R-02-139 (Dalpay et al). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Rezone: Dalpay Property, NE An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property 12th St, R-8 to R-10 (R-02- consisting of 1.16 acres located on the 3800 and 3900 blocks of NE 12th St. 139) extending as far as 126 feet north of the public right-of-way from Residential - eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Residential - ten dwelling units per acre (R-10) zoning; R-02-139 (Dalpay et al). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. Rezone: Merlino Property, SW An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Sunset Blvd, RM-I to R-10 (R- consisting of 25.68 acres immediately east of the Sunset View Apartments and 01-164) south of SW Sunset Blvd. and north of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way from Residential Multi -Family - Infill (RM-I) to Residential - ten dwelling units per acre (R-10) zoning; R-01-164 (Merlino - SR 900 LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/15/2003. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler noted parking problems on S. 3rd St., Transportation: Parking Policy explaining that although the street is signed no parking, a house is being re No Parking -Signed Streets constructed on that street, and the construction worker's vehicles are parked along the street as they have nowhere else to park. She requested review of the policy related to situations like this. December 8, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 458 ` MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER REVIEW OF THE PARKING POLICY CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION -RELATED VEHICLE PARKING AND RESIDENT PARKING NEEDS ON NO PARKING -SIGNED STREETS TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Police: Street Racing Referring to a letter from Dr. Alonzo Plough, Director and Health Officer for Seattle -King County Public Health Department, 999 3rd Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, 98104, in which local jurisdictions are asked to review their existing street racing ordinances, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER STREET RACING TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:11 p.m. &- _M"nw ar BONNIE I. WAL:TON, City Clexk Recorder: Michele Neumann December 8, 2003 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT. CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 8, 2003 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 12/15 Bales Annexation; (Keolker-Wheeler) 6:30 p.m. 2004 Legislative Priorities COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES MON., 12/08 2004 Council Committee Assignments (Persson) (Immediately Following Council Meeting) COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 12/15 King County Agreement for Regional (Nelson) 6:00 p.m. Affordable Housing FINANCE MON., 12/15 Vouchers (Parker) 5:30 p.m. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY (Clawson) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Persson) UTILITIES (Corman) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day to -day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The 2004 Renton Community Calendar was delivered to Renton residents last week. Additional copies are available at the Renton Community Center, Renton Senior Activity Center, Renton Public Library, Highlands Library, Renton Historical Museum, and in the lobby of Renton City Hall. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The new 2004 Winter/Spring Recreation Brochure has been distributed and features diverse programs and activities offered to meet the needs of all Renton citizens. Class registration opens to Renton residents this Tuesday, December 9 h. Registration for non-residents begins on Thursday, December I l '. Individuals with a PIN can register for classes via Cyber Sign -Up on the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, or through Fast Fone-In, 425-430-6729. Registration may also be in person at the Renton Community Center, located at 1715 Maple Valley Highway. • The Wal-Mart Foundation made a $1,000 donation to the Housing Repair Assistance Program for the purchase of smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be installed in the homes of clients. The 2003 Housing Repair Policies require installation of detectors in all client homes in order to be in compliance with the Renton Fire Code. • The Renton Youth Health Center, formerly the Renton Teen Health Center, plans to reopen in December. King County restored the Center's 2004 funding in the amount of $281,524, thereby allowing the operation of the two school -linked health centers in Burien/Highline and Renton. Open two days a week, the Center served about 100 patients per month before it closed in June of this year due to uncertain funding. • Join in the holiday spirit and share in the City of Renton's Giving Tree Program. Four trees are available at city locations including the Community Center (1715 Maple Valley Highway), City Hall (1055 S Grady Way), and Carco Theatre (1717 Maple Valley Highway). Trees feature tags that provide information about the age and gender of the recipient as well as gift suggestions. To participate, just take a tag or tags from the tree and return the wrapped gifts, with tags attached, to any of the above locations by December 170'. For more information about this program, please call 425-430-6650. • A planned power outage scheduled for last Thursday, December 4`h, at Carco Theater and the Community Center was cancelled due to the windstorm. The City will work with Puget Sound Energy to reschedule the outage as soon as possible. • Clam Lights kicked off last week at Coulon Beach Park, and the lights will be displayed nightly through January 1" from dusk until 8:30 p.m. • Several holiday concerts are taking place in Renton this week, including the Renton City Concert Band Holiday Concert this Thursday, December 11`h; Christmas Swing by Mach One Jazz Orchestra on Friday, December 12'h; and the Renton Youth Symphony Orchestra's Holiday Concert on Sunday, December 14'h. For additional information and to reserve tickets for any of these performances, call 425-430-6707. Administrative Report December 8, 2003 Page 2 • The Recreation Division will host the Canine Candy Cane 5K Fun Run & Walk this Sunday, December 14e1, for competitive runners, fun runners, walkers, junior athletes, and families (with or without a dog). Race -day registration begins at 8:00 a.m., with the run starting from the Renton Community Center at 9:00 a.m. Call 425-430-6700 for additional information. HUMAN RESOURCES AND RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT • The Blood Mobile will be at Renton City Hall this Thursday, December 1 Ph, in the 7th Floor HR Training Room from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • Last Monday, December 1", Executive Ron Sims announced that the preferred location of the Brightwater north end wastewater treatment plant is the Woodinville location near Route 9. • Rainier Wood Recyclers offered free wood recycling service to help King County residents dispose of storm debris blown down during the recent windstorm. Homeowners were invited to drop off limbs and branches at no charge on Saturday, December 6t', from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at any of the Rainier Wood Recyclers locations. • King County's Renton Transfer Station, located at 3021 NE 4th Street, reopened for service to the public on November 24"'. Hours of operation are Monday through Sunday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. However, due to damage caused by the recent windstorm, the station experienced service disruptions of waste transport from the station to the Cedar Hills Landfill. For updates on transfer station service, contact King County Solid Waste at 206-296-4466 or check their website at www.metrokc.gov. • The December 4a' windstorm caused trees to fall across several streets in Renton, resulting in temporary road closures while the tree trunks and wood debris were being removed. Downed trees and damaged power poles caused S. Mill Avenue near Carr Road to be closed until the weekend. Lyons Avenue NE near NE 3rd St., the 2200 block of Jones Avenue NE, and SE 6th St. near Maplewood Park were temporarily closed due to downed trees. These streets are now open for traffic, but cleanup of woody debris will continue over the next few weeks. • The Regional Transit Improvement District (RTID) will hold a special meeting on December 110, between 9:00 a.m. and noon at the Port of Tacoma Building (3600 Port of Tacoma Road in Tacoma) to work on a draft plan and schedule for a possible upcoming ballot issue to fund regional transportation projects. Renton Public Works staff will attend this meeting. POLICE DEPARTMENT • During the week of December 9-15, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following areas and, in addition, all school zones during school days: Renton Police Department Traffic Enforcement Emphasis December 9-15 Date 6:00 a.m. to Noon Noon to 6:00 p.m. All Da Motorcycles/Cars Motorcycles/Cars Radar Trailer December 9, Tuesday SW Sunset Blvd (turns/speed) Benson Dr S (speed) 500 blk, Williams 400 blk, Cedar Ave S (speed) Rainier Ave N (speed) Ave N December 10, Wednesday 1100 blk, Carr Rd (speed) Maple Valle H (speed) 400 blk, Cedar Ave S (speed) 2600 blk, NE 7te St (speed) 3700 blk, Sunset Blvd NE December 11, Thursday Lk Wash Blvd (speed) Maple Valley Hwy (speed) 3700 blk, Sunset SW Sunset Blvd (turns/speed) 700 blk, SW Grady Way (speed) Blvd NE December 12, Friday 700 blk, SW 43d St (speed) 2700 blk, Benson Dr (speed) 3700 blk, Sunset Rainier Ave N (speed) 1100 blk, N 30th St (speed) Blvd NE December 15, Monday 1100 blk, Carr Rd (speed) 300 blk, Edmonds Ave SE 300 blk, Edmonds Rainier Ave N (speed) (speed) Ave SE 1400 Houser Way (speed) RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 8, 2003 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; KING PARKER; TERRI BRIERE. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; VICTORIA RUNKLE, Finance and Information Services Administrator; ELAINE GREGORY, Fiscal Services Director; SYLVIA DOERSCHEL, Finance Analyst Supervisor; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Wal-Mart Foundation made a $1,000 donation to the Housing Repair Assistance Program for the purchase of smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be installed in the homes of clients. * The Renton Youth Health Center, formerly the Renton Teen Health Center, plans to reopen in December. King County restored the Center's 2004 funding, thereby allowing the operation of the two school -linked health centers in Burien/Highline and Renton. * King County's Renton Transfer Station, located at 3021 NE 4th St., reopened for service to the public on November 24. Hours of operation are Monday through Sunday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 1, 2003. Council concur. December 1, 2003 Appointment: Municipal Arts Mayor Tanner reappointed Jeremy Chambers, 15823 130th Pl. SE, Renton, Commission 98055; Edythe Gandy, 3807 NE 8th Ct., Renton, 98056; Nancy Hoben, 17434 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058; and Eleanor Simpson, 418 Wells Ave. N., Renton, 98055; each to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three year term expiring 12/31/2006. Council concur. Development Services: Elsa Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of Ridge Short Plat, ROW additional right-of-way for a 15-foot radius at the corner of NE 38th St. and Dedication at NE 38th St & Lincoln Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Elsa Ridge Short Plat (SHP-02- Lincoln Ave NE 086). Council concur. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board. . Staff Contact...... AJLS Department Jesse Tanner, Mayor Subject: Reappointments to Municipal Arts Commission Jeremy Chambers Edythe Gandy Nancy Hoben Eleanor Simpson Exhibits: Recommended Action: Council Concur Al #: For Agenda of: December 8, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Tanner reappoints the following to the Municipal Arts Commission: Jeremy Chambers, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Mr. Chambers' address is: 15823 130`h Pl SE, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 425-864-1497. Edythe Gandy, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Ms. Gandy's address is.: 3807 NE 8`h Ct, Renton, WA 98056; Phone 425-226-7993. Nancy Hoben, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06.. Ms. Hoben's address is: 17434 128`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98058; Phone 425-228-2953. Eleanor Simpson for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Ms. Simpson's address is: 418 Wells Ave N, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 425-271-3537. The other members of the Municipal Arts Commission are: Ava Hammond, Gifford Visick, Diana Hagen, Renne Saling, Jerri Everett, Michael O'Halloran, Doug Kyes, and one vacancy (Paul Webb resigned 11/20/03). X Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board. . Staff Contact...... AJLS Department Jesse Tanner, Mayor Subject: Reappointments to Municipal Arts Commission Jeremy Chambers Edythe Gandy Nancy Hoben Eleanor Simpson Exhibits: Recommended Action: Council Concur Al #: o134 For Agenda of: December 8, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Tanner reappoints the following to the Municipal Arts Commission: Jeremy Chambers, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Mr. Chambers' address is: 15823 130' PI SE, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 425-864-1497. Edythe Gandy, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Ms. Gandy's address is: 3807 NE 81h Ct, Renton, WA 98056; Phone 425-226-7993. Nancy Hoben, for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Ms. Hobert's address is: 17434 128`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98058; Phone 425-228-2953. Eleanor Simpson for a three-year term that expires on 12/31/06. Ms. Simpson's address is: 418 Wells Ave N, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 425-271-3537. The other members of the Municipal Arts Commission are: Ava Hammond, Gifford Visick, Diana Hagen, Renne Saling, Jerri Everett, Michael O'Halloran, Doug Kyes, and one vacancy (Paul Webb resigned 11/20/03). X Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL F.- � u� ' C. - Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: December 8, 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plats. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Hearing Examiner's Report Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other. .............. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a 15-foot radius at the corner of NE 38`h St and Lincoln Ave NE. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the Elsa Ridge Short Plat, LUA02-086, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2003\E1saRidgeSHPL 05 AGNBILL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: Project File #: Street Intersection: Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Gra ors . Grantee(s): 1 • 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) ©F D'e te-por1 L.1 -ca nAs ar. vF -pSwT�i 'P�t�poet UNO- k-IWM V � I'S �vr 9-AOVus frp- R46"r oFIA41 Ar TtW- (Vgt-.1M c.c NE le- P*--V UPt&W P VEJOVE NE . The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ADDroved and Accented Bv: Grantor Grantee(s): City of Renton 44 Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/DEED.DOC\ CoR Page I FORM 04 0001 /bh INDIVID UAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORA TE FORM OF A CKNO WL ED GMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASIIINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) Ae c 2 On this.{{ day of l 49, , before me personally appeared to me known to VELTA M. S T R O M BE A e of the corporation that Ent cut a within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free STATE OF WASHi N G1. Vol tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein io ,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said NOTAR f — • — PUBL&gym nt ann that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. ±rfY COMMISSION LXPIRES 02.08-07 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ' Notary (Print) Ur—/ -r.4 M- sLg o A4 16 t K �o My appointment expires: A /t/o'> Dated: CAVA WORD\FORMS\EA ESMT.DOC\ Page 2 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 Map Exhibit ELSE RIDGE PORTION OF SW 1/4, NE 1/4, SECC2Z T 24 N, R 5 E, W.M. ClTY OF RENTON, KWG COUNTY, WAMNGTON sar, -- -- -- N88 47 D7'W ' N 88W 44" W 29& 13' 195.06-71-77-7 i / r I 1 2 1 1 /ace/ sr j t 1 1 11.9 �GJ 11�-------- 9 t 1 � 1 1 ID' PRYA1E-+ alWX EASS"I I :aPEWA 7m / /tisGS SF N6679 54 W / / /'4tQ% /-----------1 0 / ; l 6 fZ SF 2 L=1365� Ra20 00 0; '✓�,�'�� 195� Sim 3=39v6'13" N 882954' W 296.07' a7r OF, PER RM I I + I ! I % � I I 1 �20' PMVA7E ACCESS/ I PI/BL/C SEIFJf EASE7� I t_ PMVAIE ACCESSIV f7Y 1 EASUME NT R EMERGENCY UNCLE. NCLE MWARCUM n _ - NO MECT WHICULAR ACCESS Tp EASEUENT UNCOCN P'L N FROM LOTS 5 AND 6 - - n 5' ERMIIE 1 EASEIE,T edlc 1 v i' d C:AVMW0RDIF0RMWA—FSM1'_DM Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bbAM 21-97 III J w W U p O r p a O 0 W m m cD z fxP,RES tf/10 03 STAMP -IT VALID UNLESS S- IND DA FED ---__---J1 qEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RG�. 5E., jY.M. I I I `, i I l T----� ' �l— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 4 j �-7 I III 1 4 I I L----- r ------ L I I I .. — .. — . ...... .. — .. — 1 `------- L-----------/ r —. —I.—..—..— SE80THST— I I ------------("----------J — — — f-------------- I I I I 11 I ; ;•' \ \ I I \ I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — F------------j \\ \------ a ---------------- I I I I I I I I I I \\ \\ I I I I I I \ \ IWI q I I ----------- I---- --------\\ \\ W v I I I Z ti H---- SITE I j \� \\ q 1 \\ W I y f---- I I I------------ \ z\ I LU ti i j I L---------- �m 11 I i I I --- I j I i v ¢ F--_I I \ SE86THPL G-------4 I n r ➢\ 7 1 \ III l i i I i f----i----io 1 I L-------1----L_� L_J L___J I I I I I til I I ml \'•"'.,',:dy`' I L----I NE35THST. I I l y l \ I I J ( I I I I W I-------- < 1 \ 1 j---- I I I I W I 11 m11 \\\yL r---iii -------J November 12, 2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: Rick Finkbeiner Cambridge Homes, Inc. 1800 NE 44" Street Renton, WA 98056 Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF 3785 Lincoln Avenue NE Subdivide an approximately 1.43-acre property into 6 lots intended for the development of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 22, 2002. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 29, 2002 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Plan Exhibit No. 4: Boundary & Topographic Survey Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting / Land Clearing Plan Exhibit No. 6: Detailed Grading Plan Exhibit No. 7: Detailed Utility Plan Exhibit No. 8: Detailed Drainage Plan Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF. November 12, 2002 , Page 2 Exhibit No. 9: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jason Jordan, Associate Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The site is located at 3785 Lincoln Avenue NE at the corner of Lincoln Place NE and Lincoln Avenue NE. The applicant, Cambridge Homes, is proposing to subdivide a 1.43-acre site located within the Residential — 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The proposal would create six lots intended for future development of single-family homes. An existing home is currently located on proposed lot 3 and would remain on proposed lot 3. The subject site is characterized by having a gradual slope up to a natural occurring ravine. The ravine runs north south, has 50 percent plus slopes and is mapped on the City's slope atlas as a protected slope. The ravine slopes to the west down towards May Creek. The proposed lots within the short plat would range from 6,034 square feet to 14,506 square feet. After the deduction of the area to be dedicated for public right-of-way along Lincoln Avenue NE and the deduction of the steep slope area west of the top of the slope line, the density at six lots comes to 5.88 dwelling units per acre which is within the required density range of the zone. Access to the proposed lots 1 through 5 would be provided from Lincoln Avenue NE. Access to proposed lot 6 would be provided from Lincoln Place NE. The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) including 11 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. Of the 1 I conditions, one was related to the geotechnical report, two through eight were related to storm water and erosion control and conditions nine through 11 were impact fees. The site is designated as Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single-family neighborhoods. Staff feels that this proposal is consistent with this because it is keeping an existing home and creating lots for five additional single-family homes. The net development density should fall within the range of five to eight dwelling units per acre. This proposal would be 5.88 dwelling units per acre which is within the prescribed range. The site is 1.43 acres in size and is located within the Residential — 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zoning designation and falls within the required density range of that zone. After deductions the density arrives at 5.88 dwelling units per acre. The minimum lot size in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The project meets all minimum lot size, width and depth requirements. Proposed Lot 5 is considered a corner lot and does meet lot depth and width requirements. The project also meets all setback requirements. On proposed lots 2, 3, and 6 per the ERC there is a 45-foot setback from the top of the slope. The existing single-family residence will be located entirely on proposed lot 3 of the plat. However, all other outbuildings or structures not located on proposed lot 3 would need to be demolished or removed as part of the development. In order to insure that this does in fact happen staff recommends that the applicant be required to obtain and finalize all demolition permits as a condition of short plat approval for all structures not located on proposed lot 3. The R-8 zone permits one single-family residence per lot. Each of the lots would support the construction of one detached single-family residence. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum of two per lot at 720 Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2002 Page 3 square feet each or a maximum of one at 1,000 square feet. The building height in this zone is limited to two stories and 30 feet in height for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory structures. The existing single-family structure does meet this requirement. Maximum building coverage is limited to 35 percent of the lot area or 2,500 square feet whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size. Each lot is required to provide two off-street parking places. It is difficult to determine until the actual building plans are seen for the proposed lots 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 if those are provided. It does appear that there is sufficient area to provide two parking stalls. On proposed lot 3 with the existing single-family home there is area for the two parking stalls. Access to proposed lot 3 is a 20-foot wide easement over proposed lots 1 and 4 that would provide access to proposed lots 2 and 3. It is also recommended that proposed lots 1 and 4 be required to access off of the easement. Staff is asking that this condition be noted on the face of the plat so that if it is sold to a homebuilder they are aware of the condition right away. The side lot lines of the proposed plat are at right angles to Lincoln Avenue NE and Lincoln Place NE. Each lot would have access to a public road from Lincoln Avenue NE. Proposed lots 1, 4 and 5 would have direct emergency vehicular access off of Lincoln Avenue NE. It is required that proposed lots 1 and 4 use the vehicular easement for vehicular access. Proposed lot 6 will have direct access to Lincoln Place NE, which is directly, south, and proposed lots 2 and 3 will be able to share the 20-foot access easement. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public right-of-way except alleys shall have a minimum radius of 15 feet. The proposed project meets this requirement. The applicant has requested a modification to installing full frontage street improvements along Lincoln Place NE. The modification has been granted by the Development Services Administrator to allow a 20-foot wide emergency and vehicular access along the property frontage of Lincoln Place NE from the southeastern corner 160 feet back towards the west. It would be 20 foot paved, emergency and vehicular access for proposed lot 6, which has been granted through a modification request. The right-of-way for Lincoln Place is actually 60 feet. Access to the six new lots is proposed via Lincoln Place NE and Lincoln Avenue NE. The applicant is required to dedicate property along the eastern property boundary along Lincoln Avenue NE. They are also required to install lighting, curb, gutter and sidewalks along that area. Proposed lot 1 will have direct emergency vehicular access off of Lincoln Avenue. Proposed lot 4 will have the same as well as proposed lot 5. Proposed lot 5 will be the only lot that has direct vehicular access onto Lincoln Avenue NE. Staff has not imposed a condition to restrict access off of Lincoln Place NE because they were under the impression that access would come off of Lincoln Avenue NE. They are aware that proposed lot 6 will have direct access onto Lincoln Place NE. Staff does not recommend a condition eliminating access from proposed lot 5 to Lincoln Place NE. Proposed lots 2 and 4 will have vehicular and emergency access over the 20-foot easement. Proposed lot 6 has access off of Lincoln Avenue. Proposed lots 1 and 4 will have emergency access off of Lincoln Avenue; however, vehicular access will have to be oriented to the 20-foot easement. In order to insure that efficient emergency access to the development is not obstructed staff is recommending that the applicant be required to place no parking signage along the 20 foot easement between proposed lots 1 and 4. This would insure that emergency vehicles are able to access proposed lots 2 and 3. Again, staff recommends that a condition be placed on the project requiring proposed lots 1 and 4 to use this as vehicular access. The proposed subdivision is expected to generate additional traffic on the city street system. To mitigate the impacts to the local street system the Environmental Review Committee did issue a traffic mitigation fee condition requiring the applicant to pay the required fee. The fee is to be paid prior to plat approval. Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2002 ' Page 4 The topography of the site is gently sloping east and west at about 11 percent grade. At the top of the slope it slopes much more drastically at a 50 percent plus rate. Because there is this type of slope on the property the applicant was required to submit a geotechnical report. As proposed, existing vegetation where drives and building footprints are planned would be removed as part of the development. The geotechnical report recommends that the applicant maintain a structure setback of 45 feet. This was made a condition by the ERC. There is a structure setback of 45 feet and the geotech recommended a 10-foot no disturbance setback, which means no grading, clearing or tree removal. Staff would expect that the 45-foot setback be shown on the final plat drawing. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control plans and the use of Best Management Practices as well as other required mitigation measures imposed by the ERC serve to mitigate potential erosion and off -site sedimentation impacts. The project application includes a construction mitigation plan, which is subject to final approval prior to construction permit issuance. With respect to relationship to existing uses, the subject site is currently developed with a single-family residence, which is proposed to remain. The surrounding area includes other single-family residences developed under the similar R-8 development standards or similar King County Residential Single Family standards. The proposed lots, in staff s opinion, are compatible with other existing and newly created lots in the area. In staff s opinion, the proposal is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. It would not be out of character or context with recent development in the area. In regard to availability and impact to public services, police and fire have indicated that there are sufficient resources to provide emergency services provided the applicant pay the required fire impact fee which was required as part of the ERC's recommendation. The proposal does not provide any on -site recreation; therefore, the ERC required a park impact fee to be paid as part of the short plat approval. The Renton School District has indicated that Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School could accommodate the expected new students generated from this proposal. In regard to storm water, the applicant would be required to submit a drainage report per the 1998 King County Storm Water Manual, which was a condition of the ERC. A Surface Water System Development Charge would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of construction permits for the short plat. The applicant will also be required to pay the appropriate Sewer System Development fee and a Water System Development fee. Both utilities are provided by the City of Renton. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the Elsa Ridge Short Plat subject to conditions. The applicant shall be required to obtain demolition permits and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for all existing structures not located on what will become new lot 3. The applicant shall place "no parking" signage near the 20-foot wide private drive serving the development. No direct vehicular access shall be allowed onto Lincoln Avenue NE from proposed lots 1 and 4. The condition shall be placed on the face of the final short plat prior to recording. Jennifer Steig, Peterson Consulting Engineers, 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 200, Kirkland, WA 98033, stated that she is representing the applicant, Cambridge Homes. They have reviewed staffs report; the ERC's conditions and the conditions for the short plat and have no issues. They anticipate providing access to proposed lot 5 from Lincoln Avenue. In regard to the 10 foot no disturb it should be shown on the final plat. Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2M2 ° Page 5 Bruce Nielsen, 3825 Lincoln Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 stated that he does have some concerns primarily with Lincoln Avenue NE. His lot is located immediately north of the subject site. On the displayed map he pointed out the areas that have been developed and sidewalks put in. Lincoln Avenue is not straight as it appears on the map. Lincoln Avenue narrows in front of his property and consequently his front lot is driven over constantly. They have no sidewalks and there is no intent to put sidewalks on his side of his street, which will put pedestrians in harms way. He is also concerned with the side of the street opposite his property; they do not have culverts they have ditches and virtually every fall or winter his mailbox floods out. With the new construction there will be additional runoff coming down Lincoln Avenue NE. The runoff has no where to go in front of his house so it goes across the road and down into the culvert. He would like to see this issue addressed with the new home construction. Ms. Steig stated that in regard to storm drainage the plan for the homes is to infiltrate the houses. Based on the geotech report the underlying soils are highly infiltrative. They will be picking up the street frontage in a conveyance system and putting it into the existing conveyance system located in Lincoln Avenue. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 stated that when the LaCrosse development went in the requirement was that they install storm all the way down Lincoln Avenue. They had to improve it so that they could use it at least partially outside of their vault. It is very new (within six years). The catch basin at the north end of this particular short plat is designed to catch all the drainage from the roadway and direct it into the system, which should route it around the northern property. Mr. Nielsen may still have some flooding off of the roadway, as it exists now. It is unclear where all that water is coming from at this point. She added that the City of Renton does have a missing link sidewalk program, which Mr. Nielsen could put a request in for. The City has dedicated monies annually specifically for this. It is on a rating system which means if there are kids walking to school it gets a higher priority then a missing link in a rural area. Lincoln Place is a 50-foot right-of-way and is very steep. Staff has asked the Fire Department if they can vacate it; however, the Fire Department is uncomfortable with the thought because it is their only link from Jones Road below up to Lincoln Avenue. Even though they would never take a large truck up there they are sure that Paramedics would use the route. It is a very narrow, steep road and is not maintained. The modification was issued partly with the thought that the 20 feet is necessary for emergency access and it has to match the driveways to the south and the existing home, which limited the design to a certain degree. Widening the pavement to 20 feet to meet the Fire Department needs as well as have a turnaround but they did not want it developed any further then absolutely necessary so as not to encourage people to use the road. Ms. Steig in regard to the access question on proposed lot 5, the applicant would obviously prefer to have the option of going from Lincoln Avenue however, if that were an imposed condition they could work with it. It is more marketable from Lincoln Avenue for the applicant. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:54 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Rick Finkbeiner, fled a request for approval of a short plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2!002 Page 6 other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located at 3785 Lincoln Avenue NE. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue NE and Lincoln Place NE. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4275 enacted in June 1990. 7. The subject site is zoned R-8 (Single Family; Lot size - 4,500 sq ft). The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. An existing single family home will be retained on the site. Other outbuildings will be removed. 10. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into six (6) lots. The division will permit the development of five new homes with the existing home proposed for new Lot 3. 11. The subject site is approximately 296 feet deep (east to west) by approximately 210 feet wide (the Lincoln Avenue frontage). 12. The subject site is located east of May Creek. The site slopes very steeply downward beginning approximately 60 feet from its western property line. The ravine that defines the western quarter or so of the site has slopes in excess of 50 percent. The remainder of the property has varied topography with approximately 11 percent slopes. 13. The site has a variety of vegetation including trees, grasses, shrubs and lawn. The ravine is comprised of native vegetations. 14. The applicant proposes two tiers of lots. Proposed Lots 1, 4 and 5 (north to south) would be the east tier of lots and would be located along the Lincoln Avenue frontage. Proposed Lots 2, 3 and 6 (again, north to south) would be in the rear. 15. Each of the lots would have dimensions shown by the table below: Width Length Area Lot 1 70 101 7,068 Lot 2 70 195 13,661 Lot 3 74 195 14,506 Lot 4 80 101 8,097 Lot 5 60 100 6,034 Lot 6 66 196 12,922 16. The geotechnical report prepared for the project recommended that the steeper slopes be maintained in Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2002 Page 7 their natural state and that two setbacks be created. There would be a 45 foot setback in which no structures or foundation would be permitted. In addition, there would be a 10-foot buffer, which would not be disturbed in any fashion including no clearing, grading or vegetation removal. The ERC included this as a specific condition. 17. Both streets, Lincoln Avenue and Lincoln Place, are not developed full width rights -of -way. They are constrained by topography. Lincoln Avenue has a grade near the subject site and sight distance is limited. Lincoln Place along the south boundary of the subject site is a very steep curving roadway. The City decided to provide a modification to not improve sections of Lincoln Place since the City prefers it not be a heavily used roadway. 18. The applicant proposes that Lots 2 and 3 be accessed by an easement roadway. The City recommended that the two lots in front of Lots 2 and 3, Lots 1 and 4 also use the easement roadway for access to limit the number of curb cuts on Lincoln Avenue. 19. Proposed Lot 6, also a rear lot, was proposed to have access via Lincoln Place, the side street. At the hearing it was suggested that Proposed Lot 5 share an access with Proposed Lot 6 to further limit the number of curb cuts along Lincoln Avenue. 20. Neighbors were concerned about traffic, discontinuous sidewalks due to varying roadway width and storm water issues. 21. Storm water will be handled under the 1998 King County Manual. The applicant proposes infiltration as well as conveying water to catch basins and a system on the east side of Lincoln Avenue. 22. The applicant will be dedicating property along Lincoln Avenue, its eastern boundary to accommod to its ��— idepInity . e d dicati n will have to be presented to the City Council. �Qdrv�e�, �, Zed � (5,�, .Am. 23. The deof the proposal was calculated after reductions for roadways and steep slope areas. The six lots would have a net density of 5.88 dwelling units per acre. Conclusions: The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest as conditioned by the ERC and herein. The plat will provide additional housing opportunities in a growing urban area. The development of the subject site with five additional homes will also increase the tax base of the City somewhat offsetting the impact of the new development. 2. While the road situation in the immediate area is not perfect, staff believes that the additional homes can be served without creating safety problems. In order to minimize safety and sight distance issues, access to both Lincoln Avenue east of the plat and Lincoln Place south of the plat should be restricted. Fewer driveways on either of those streets will reduce the potential for turning conflicts. Therefore, proposed lots 1 to 4 shall be limited to sharing an access easement roadway that runs east to west and intersects with Lincoln Avenue NE between proposed lots 1 and 4. Similarly, proposed lots 5 and 6 shall share a driveway although in this case, the applicant can decide on an easement in common or some other form of shared driveway. This means that there shall be no other access to the public streets other than that provided by the respective shared access and this restriction shall be shown on the face of the plat. 3. The site's steep topography dictate that a buffer be protected at the top of the slope. In addition, the site's storm water will be subjected to the stricter standards of the 1998 Storm Water Manual. In addition, the Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2002 Page 8 topography dictated a reduction in density due to the formulas that require steep slopes to be removed from acreage. The density of 5.88 proposed is appropriate for the Zoning. 4. Staff has suggested that it might be possible to create a sidewalk extension north of the subject site using a City "Missing Link" program. Neighbors are encouraged to pursue that possibility. Under the circumstances in this case, it would not be appropriate to require extensions beyond the frontage of this site. 5. In conclusion, the proposed plat will provide additional single-family housing choices without unduly burdening the neighborhood or overall community. Decision: The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall obtain demolition permits and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for all existing structures not located on what would become new lot 3. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall place "No Parking" signage near the 20-foot wide private drive serving the development. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the Development Services Division prior to recording of the short plat. 4. Proposed lots 1 to 4 shall be limited to sharing an access easement roadway that runs east to west and intersects with Lincoln Avenue NE between proposed lots 1 and 4. Proposed lots 5 and 6 shall share a driveway that provides access to Lincoln Place NE. 6. There shall be no other access to the public streets other than that provided by the respective shared access methods outlined above. 7. All access limitations and restrictions shall be shown on the face of the plat. ORDERED THIS 12'h day of November, 2002. FRED J. KAUF HEARING EXA ER TRANSMITTED THIS 12`h day of November, 2002 to the parties of record: Elsa Ridge Short Plat File No.: LUA-02-086,SHPL-H,ECF November 12, 2002 Page 9 Jason Jordan 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Rick Finkbeiner Cambridge Homes, Inc. 1800 NE 44"' Street Renton, WA 98056 Myrte Farr Estate 8441 110°i Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Jennifer Steig Lorelie Shaw 1055 S Grady Way Peterson Consulting Engineers 3828 Lincoln Ave. NE Renton, WA 98055 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 200 Renton, WA 98056 Kirkland, WA 98033 Gordon Donnel Bruce Nielsen PO Box 2576 3 82 5 Lincoln Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 12`h day of November, 2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division South County Journal Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 1 OOG of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 26, 2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 26, 2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. City of Renton P/8/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ELSA RIDGE SHORT PLAT LUA-02-086, SHPL-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE. • October 29, 2002 Page 9 of 9 Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The applicant would be required to pay a Sewer System Development fee, based on a rate of $760.00 per lot and a Water System Development fee at a rate of $1,105.00 per new lot. The City would not require any sewer and/or water main extensions at this time, as there are existing facilities in Lincoln Avenue NE. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Elsa Ridge Short Plat, Project File No. LUA-02-086, SHPL-H, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain demolition permits and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for all existing structures not located on what would become new Lot :73 The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall place "No Parking" signage near the 20-foot wide private drive serving the development. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the Development Services Division prior to recording of the short plat. 3. No direct vehicular access shall be allowed onto Lincoln Avenue NE from Lots 1 and 4. This condition shall be placed on the face of the final short plat prior to recording. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Short Plats (SHPL): If the short plat is not filed within two (2) years of the dates of approval, the short plat shall be null and void. A one year extension may be granted if requested prior to the first two year expiration. HEXRPT.doc Di 40' An , Av. n / / / y 6 / 3 / 5 SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. ELSA RIDGE VICINITY MAP: Nor TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES. ONN[R: MYRTLE PARR 5441 110TH AVE SE RMTOL WASNMOM DSOSS DEKEI PM- CAMBRIDGE MOVES Wa 1800 NE "IN Sr .SLRIE 200 RENRY4 WASIRNOTON ROM ENCNEEM PETERSON COKLX77NO C'ICNEERS Wa 4aT0 LAKE WASKNOTO! SLW NE SV/TE 2CO KMKLANO, WA5IIWOTTTN *a= (425) 127-SB7« CONTACT. "&7R A STE IL PS SURKEYOR. MEAD OILMAN t ASSOCIATES P.a BOX 2" 0 000WWLLE VA TON 08072 (425) 456-1252 CON YAC7' SHANE BARNES P.L.S. TOTAL AREA. (.I-). IZ217 So. Fr. (1.43 ACRES (CROSS)) TOTAL AREA ROADS ZSJB SO. FT. (406 ACRES) CIOOCAL AREAS fV37 Sa FT. (a." AMES) NET AMC- 44,511 Sa FT. (1.02 ACRES) TOTAL LOTS I RMCOMAL LOTS MAX ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 5 DUTACRE (NEVI PROPOSED DMS?r I W/ACRE (NET) EXISTING ZONING R-5 PROPOSED ZCISNC R-5 BENCHMARKAND DATUM: OOCNµ BM. CITY Or RMTOW STAOCW Na 1595 - CASED CONC MON WIN J-W BRASS DISK DONN 1.5; I AT CENWXWE AYWC71CW Of' IIITH AW- Sr ! Sr MIN ST. "VA7ION- 321.25' (97.925 METERS) CRIOWAL BM• CITY OF RENTOJ STATION No 266 - CASED CONC MOW WTN W BRASS PIN. DOWN 02'1 A CEVMWNE JN1ERSEC17CI Or HONES ALL HE t NE 25TH sr. ELEVADOI. 247.Br (7SSS2 METERS) TBM-I, PK W/SONER ad' EAST OF NEST EDGE PAWWENT LWCOUV AVENUE 3 22' N d- CEMC%MC DRIVEWAY TO NOOSE AYM ETEVAnOO- 120.60' IBM_ PK W/stampt NEST EDGE PAVEMENT LANCOLM A W" NE AT SOUTH EDGE L NCON DRIVE NE ELEVADO _ 184.25, TBM-A: TO^ CF CAP BClT OF F/Rf HYDRANT W:ST SUE Or LWCOW AW NE AT APPROX CENTER FRONT OF s"cr SITE (/0783 LINCOLN AWL E1EVADON- 1J7.15' DATUM, MAW I955(CITY OF RENTON) BAVT OF S ARIN2 PLAT O' WWM4A*K nLED IN BOOK 174. AT PACE(S) B TNRU 11. UNDER RECOIONO Na DW72SOM RECORZIS OF X" COUVrT WABAW ON LEGAL DESCRIPTION.• LOT Y BLOM .X as UXIMAMS LAKE WASNPIOTON CARDEN OF MEN, DIWS7O/ Na 7, AS RECORDED XF VOL II OF PUTS PAGE 14 RECORDS OF MO CdMrY, WASNWCTM SITUATE IN 7NE CITY OF AMT0144 CO/NTY Or 094 STATE OF WA.W7NOTOL r'/1 f . I IL ---> m �4444d444444 � 2 >T. z O ti Z s c� a Q 2 J Elf W W C10' U Am7B 'L 1 O'tiO EXPIRES TT TO 02 srA morvA UAESs SATNEDANDOATE0 ETERSON CONSULTING 4030 lake Washington Blvd. N.E., Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Tel 425) 827-5874 Fax 425) 822-7216 >�M7XLI CAMB-0001 SHEETN R ./ ./ / OF / �� 1SH9E3N \ \ I I );6 I I I I I --T..—..—.._.._..-1SH19E3N-..�.._. \ I \ I \ I \ I \ I I I j j I I I I III \ I -------I I I —r\\ �� i1 \ I I /� rt�ol•°N, 1N°"~7 � I � I I I I I �------{ L— L-1�1`=--'----iL—L-1---- \7dH1993S/ - L-1-_--_-1 -----� \\\ \- a I I\ ;------------1 mr'j i d `\\r�l�\\\ i 311S i: i---- �—� ----------------- -------- .. -------------I I I I i� I i ill I I I I-------�\ \\\ r-------------I I I I--------- \` \ _, I I \\\ '7\ ----- as -„j^ii y ----------------i I I1--------- ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — i -------— — — — — — — — — _1SH1093S — _.._. I I i i i I I I • � I 1 f In I I I I _L Ji--------- - - - - - - - - - - i r '39 VOY'W PZ.VAU 'CC A� I I i I I I IDi�ytl� '' I ON.NOdM�--- i I I I I L-- I I L� I I I Z m x 0 0 S SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. m 40' 0 40' 1 I SCALE: I' - 40' 7/5/02 ILI I I 1 1� NI RI ELSA RIDGE LOT NUMBER LOT AREA 1 7,068 SF 2 iJ,661 Sr J 14,506 5F 4 6, 097 SF 5 6,034 SF 6 12,922 SF f k M SITE F Ia K wr aeaK Met VICINITYMAP. NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES. ' OWNER: MYRTLE FARR 0441 IIODN Al£ SE RENTON WASHING1ON Deai6 DEIELOPM. CAMBRIDGE Noma INa 1800 HE 447H Sr SLOE 200 RENM-4 WASHINGTON DeM ENCINEER PETERSO N CONSULRNO ONwms6 INC 40JO LAKE WASHWOMN SL1'D HE SLRTL 200 KIRKLANA WASNOOTOI DeD.xJ (425) &27-5e74 CONTACT: ,ENAVER A SMr AL SURVEYOR: MEAD OILMAN t ASSOCIATES P.D. BOX 289 W00000MLL WASANOTDN 0e072 (425) 4e6-1252 CONTACT. SHANE BARN= P.L.S TOTAL AREA: N/-k 622e7 S0. P7. (Lu ACRES (O =)) TOTAL AREA ROADS Z639 S'0. IT. (a06 ACRES) C IMAL AREAS f41J7 So. R. (aM ACRES) NET AREA: 44511 SO Fr. (1.02 ACRES) TOTAL LOTS 'ENDAL LOTS MAY ALLOWABLE DENSITY. a OU/AORE (NET) PROPOSED DDWTYI a DU/ACRE (NET) EMRNO ZOONG R-a PROPOSED ZOBNO R-e BENCHMARK AND DATUM: OMOINAL BM: CITY O' RENTON STARON Na 1e93 - CASED GYWC MON WIN J-W BRASS ASK DOWN 1.5. AT LYNTERUNE INURSECAON O' IE67N AI£ SE t SE SOM Sr.. aCVADON- 321.26' COZO25 METERS) OgfaWAL W. CITY OF REMON STARON Na 2ee - CASED CLNC MON WAN 1/8" BRASS PK DOWN 4.21, AT ONYMME BNTERSECRON K .ONES AME. HE k HE 281M Sr.. ELEVARON- 24zor (75557 METERS) MM-1: i 21 COON AKNIlE PINE DRREWA Y TO NOISE /J7eS aCVAROI- 12D.60' IBM-27 PK W/VWNER, WEST EDGE PAKMONT LNCOLN AM" HE AT SO/IN EDGE UNCOIN DRIVE NC ETEYARON- 164.25' 18N-A: TOP or CAP BOLT K nRE NYORANr WEST SIDE OP LIMMN Alf HE AT AMWOY CENTER FRONT OF SVB.ECT VIE; (p7e5 LINCOILN AW). B"ARLN- IJ7.15' DATINN NAw /Dee (CITY Or REMT.N) BIAS K RFIRRN2 PLAT Or WTOTENAWW. FXZV IN BOO! 174, AT PAWS) D TNRU ff. UNDER RECORONO Na 0507250"A, RECORDS OF KM CO NM WAVONGAM LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LOT 7, BLOCK; CA. HILWANIS LAKE WASNPIOMN OARDEN O' MEN, OVSILN Na 7, AS RECORDED AN ✓ X 16 OF PLANS PACE 14 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTO. SITUATE IN NNE CITY OF RENTOK COUNTr O• KAVr STALL OF WA9WNCIONE �aa aaaa aaa as yQ � 1� gga y� Yl yya, p G 2y �y� ppy O Z h L 3 2 a n 5 sK4 ti 810WAL �` 0y0 EXPIRES 11 10 02 e7AIP—r ✓AMD LMESSSAMEDANDDAIM PETERSON CONSULTING 4030 lAke Washington Blvd, N.E., Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Tel (425) 827-5874 Fax (425) 622-7216 JOB NUMBER CAMB-0001 SHEET .( / OF / L ll f •1 IL� z 27.e . W {Iii ili I,i �ih I 130 , eJ'iii t, M- mo - 127.7 til.e CHAI UNK FENCE wx. it bli '.132.5 •.'•'; •,.•':' � Pf �I! ld,� .30 ,1m IJ0.2 )� -� ram. •- . 132; 4:', •'. •. :••'•'.:•• '••'•'' '•' "✓ 2 "F 'i f a! \' - �r v� 13u' 1sx:1.•r�.•.•.'.;��'•:��'•t:;••'.••. •�' uza Iri9::. r.7 `� NI J �I WM ZI OOF 1J2.9 34"F 30"F�r M , iJ22. WHO 133.4 N 11� 132,.� 132.9 iy d I C / 1 1 / tut • t33.o O ,/ Hll �'•'' ;,I Q I I. ". .132 28"F L. / �l Z / 3380."e{�j t3s 11 ::: j tua t33.x ; PP/ 7 /1 �• Am .- ON /r. f 134.2 I WMH _ TR t' "e� TOP (RIM) EL 135.24' 13J 4 HB X 30"F ,1 y Y f' I 18" N. h S. 7e 2 e<... / STEP 134.0 ..... t H o e h ' .. w^�. HOLISE43785'L �M..A.- TOP MAIN EL = 129.5T I S0P HALVE EL. 131.43' ,a / •� 1-STORY W -��'777 .,r:.:.. •. 133.8 ./134. BASEMENT/ / I 10 F 13t.e, 1 W w H! .,1 P 6OTTOM STCR. EL 127.42' I 131.2 FF HOUSE=138.17 /y� 7 HB FF BSMT-130.16' 1 I ` _ n a 1 �� 'r 13sa oiq-208 `I / IF ''•' L' 6TEP132.1 S / .N" 1 ., B"F� 2-F . J *332'etJ�:�t. ,;; Q INV: EL = 128.08. - 132.7 / . .4 (I\ �•- .� Ills 24"F 24"FM g 1e.2 1.33.3 jn 133.7 j � • ' � �l' '?Nf . / 73.3 O/ 131.� r •-I' 6 ��. / �M i'� j' �Ivj TOPEL ��2!2L F ..�[[�ramy I!' IpF 9'• .., !' 18" ADS S. INV. EL = 134.76' 0 / _ .•73.a / 24"F �6"C 6"F"v�;'( ' �, f :: IJa.4 I , B" ADS N. INV. EL = 134..58' y a 44"F us.z i, BOTTOM STCR. EL = 133.64' J 131.2 12"CH . "F 17x.S ./ 5 133 22"f . �. 13(.7 hl ' '{: 14i1 i / 34"0 _- J 1ri.4• . / 20" .. !'t 13&9. 6 �.` t+t w� !-{�',,�`\6 C P}�8829'S4� W 6.07` / - 12o.e// I T _�r!••l'.. j317'.,•;., 6T•S"' F 6.0 / 1✓ j �.:-:;•.:: 7RA'TWA :;.LiS t3°.4 /149.0 �n o2 .71� 6"F t�A ! { i I CB-206 4"MC(;1 8 fY 8ua:o� n 141s J .r' "'' " TOPI EL = 154.21' . 73.7 \ ;'• .', • ..'.' . %`.i "•'- 139.J 1 F 1 O•F'r /•'S A E - 4 18" ADS N. INV. EL = 151.02' \ � rse�o----��.•..l�,,t•� 4' � ^-• ., 'I�'. � 18' ADS S. INV. EL. _151.02' A 124.Oy+ ` 1 p I 143.J I , „ 141.4 "I ADS SE INV. EL = 150.88' 13e. "FI 'Ij1e.� g" /8�/w x:',••<.;1 BO11iOM STCR. EL = 149.80' 12" CONC ,NV EL = 131.4' -_ nr4Jts4.7 12" CONC INV El 134.1' i% lhlt. t 1 ,..: 0" Ssl; Ij[j i5! 1 I CB-204 TYPE 11 / 12" CONC INV EL* a 138.4' ` � II{rl�� IrI!i� ,� !n� / % ! (`I '1 14, k "' 12P EL ADS E. IW.2EL - 151 .T41 y�` `jR4 :,.„t!'': ;,• u1. ! ,se.o {' r 12" ADS NW INV. EL 15 CDNCR '- !{ 11 i 1`�t ' •'!f, �l m BOTTOM STCR. EL 149.2 :;`ARNgwA7:" NI it d�(P�t' ss / 12 CONC INV EL = 139.T �1 " 1 d !Lliii 1' rtYil CB-203 TYPE I 1 ttL7i is i• i!'lII 1i ;J: TOP EL. - 160.14' Qom• SSMH-205 - ? ;'' 'tr' +I w' 2 12' ADS E. INV. EL = 155.85' . . �. . 'TOP L n 159.41 16 7 . ;M�t11 1 ! it tt 1 BOTTOM STCR. EL = 155.49' . / _ \ 12' INV. N: k E. 1 .a '�'. i {iii ,, EJB /\ \ / INV. EL 147.15 . I 'tit ,.,,.a . L.S I cD DLncl: :r z J sutC r• . JC w U o iii ram' y l.Ahh wEN N�Nr TON OIViS16NF voi. x SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5E. W.M. SHOhr NAT SMOS.17 car I 1 111,H' W 186.I3' imr, waw +a rt.m+%mgv lrvrJ wl I% I N%. % • ti � 4-I I 1'; •r 1 i - I I - P 1� ��:..�:.':�':::'�':.'�'�':'.�h•.m atpgµo.;l:�.�..'��.'.''i eulvMr uv I �'r j!=---.TBdGI-T_�I� L--- - — ` I' ro'rJJ� �' / : I \ � l I Ill \I \/rOT I / • / I l{'�- 1 , r �• 77�C \v/ I l y l l I I � '• i / 1 IN9 1------------- /� - qq1, IY kr \ 1{tn w�•at�� I 1 � u^I fnrJ Oe \ mnmrcnov J I �1 j 17 \ / r 1 / w Iv Y STAMP NOT VAUD UNLESS STAMPED AND DATED � - J�. a I I I I I I mq neLmaa'• cX. CD-1o.rwc o X W110J—C/ m o wJ �mr. n. �x:iir SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. SHORT PLAT 5803.9 LDr z O L O C N 3 ---------- Yp-------------� -� --- Z. al LAO n N!LLHaµDM GFw�. 7 G.... ' DIVI:�•i?NirptiE: fe Vol. 16 �O ` •y nvwls eYre to J STAMP NO7 VALID UNLESS STAMPED AND DA 1 I Nt J•roI ' �-- III I a,.�.---�'�' oI I ' I I aro L------------- r----------- I nI \ -1 _ I - ------ I l l 6 I 5 ) -- 1 mvtarcaou , T_—_--__ A I \ 296.07' GENERAL NOTES NIE AREA . ez2e7 M It .0A ARCA - J7.201 II - t G K / () — C2. 55uwg2 RCL .Lou er,J IONSpsee raIs) a r- (!7M01FUMAFMAL 'wJ•N•wn. '�.Aao� I /' rEro of DCMR—CA I JC • �? �9-id7 rwf , �7hyMro^ n J • 's! it / GOY2fIfhR n. r>..0 I�;e•bf l�wY n. '.iJJ '4 b I IOINu fIA. n. �m01 fXI CB�IO� MCI m •us(( .n r I MIIOu 6rDl. 0. IJI.JJ' i CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Rebecca Lind Subject: Interlocal Agreement for Regional Affordable Housing Program Exhibits: Issue Paper Letter from Ron Sims, King County Executive Interlocal Agreement Al #: , For Agenda of: December 8, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to the Community Services Committee Legal Dept .... X..... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. X SUMMARY OF ACTION: In March 2002, the legislature passed Substitute House Bill 2060 to authorize a surcharge on document recording as a means of funding affordable housing. The revenue generated is split between the state and local governments with 60% of the revenue retained by the county in a special fund to be used by the county and its cities to support very low-income housing. These funds must be allocated among the jurisdictions by an inter -local agreement between the county and cities that is consistent with regional housing policies and objectives. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Interlocal Agreement for the Regional Affordable Housing Program. Regional Affordable Housing Program CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President City Council Members VIA: jC, Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (6588) SUBJECT: Regional Affordable Housing Program ISSUE: Whether the City of Renton agrees to participate in an inter -local agreement with King County pertaining to distribution of funds established by Substitute House Bill 2060. RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the Mayor to execute the proposed inter -local agreement for administration of the Local Low -Income Housing Funds in King County. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: In March 2002, the legislature passed Substitute House Bill 2060 to authorize a surcharge on document recording as a means of funding affordable housing. An estimated 2.3 million dollars will be available for annual distribution. The revenue generated is split between the state and local governments, with 60 % of the revenue retained by the county in a special fund to be used by the county and its cities to support very low-income housing. These funds must be allocated by among the jurisdictions by an inter -local agreement between the county and cities that is consistent with regional housing policies and objectives. In King County a working group of county, city and housing organization staff met during 2002 to establish a set of guidelines for administration of this program, "Guidelines for the Administration and Allocation of SHB2060 Local Low -Income Housing Funds in King December 3, 2003 Page 2 County" (Guidelines). EDNSP staff participated in the initial meetings and subsequently monitored the process. These Guidelines will take affect after adoption by the King County Council and remain in effect through December 2006. The City is already participating in a regional forum reviewing distribution of federal block grant dollars through the Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME). Through the King County Consortium, authorized by existing inter -local agreements between the suburban cities and King County, a Joint Recommendations Committee (JRC) allocates HOME funding. The existing HOME working group will also be expanded administer the new Regional Affordable Housing Program funding(RAHP). The RAHP/HOME will make project recommendations to the JRC as with the current the procedure for HOME funding. Renton is currently represented at the HOME working group by the Human Services Division of the Community Services Department. RAHP funding will be dispersed within three Sub -regions: 1) Seattle, 2) North/East urban and rural areas, and 3) south urban and rural areas. Half of RAHP funds will be allocated based on the sub-region's relative share of existing need for affordable housing. Existing need is determined by the percentage of low-income households paying more than 30 % of income for housing according to the 2000 Census. The remaining half of RAHP funds will be allocated based on the sub-region's growth targets and future need as established by the Growth Management Planning Council. Future need is derived from a formula established in the Countywide Planning Policies. The following priorities are established for RAHP funding: 1) Capital funds for acquisition, rehabilitation and or new construction of low-income housing. 2) Building operations and maintenance funds for transitional housing. 3) Operating funds for emergency and youth shelters. 4) Rental assistance voucher administered by a local housing authority. All projects or units funded must serve households at or below 50% of area median income. Populations served include families, homeless families and individuals, including youth, special needs populations, including seniors and disabled households. Eligible applicants include nonprofit organizations, housing authorities and local governments. RAHP administration will be handled through existing staffing provided by the King County Housing and Community Development (HCD) Program at no cost. Capital funds will be administered by the King County HCD's Housing Finance Program. CONCLUSION: December 3, 2003 Page 3 The guidelines developed for this program provide for equitable allocation of dollars based on existing housing and growth policies, and further a cooperative relationship among jurisdictions. Participation in this program through the inter -local agreement provides an opportunity to expand support for affordable housing in the region without creating any additional staffing or fiscal responsibility for Renton. Cc: Jay Covington Derek Todd Dennis Culp Karen Berksvik RECEIVED . SEP 1 72003 CITy OF REEP!TON t_RV!CE King County Executive--- RON SIMS September 12, 2003 Dear Mayors, City Managers, CDBG and HOME Consortium Coordinators: I am very pleased to present for your city's review and approval the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for the new Regional Affordable Housing Program ("RAHP'), and the RAHP Guidelines, attached thereto as Exhibit 1. This regional partnership will benefit our communities through the provision of new affordable housing for many years to come. The planning process to formulate this new program was a very exciting regional process and I am grateful to all the participants from local jurisdictions and from the housing community. Following upon the work of the planning group, I recommended for King County Council approval an ordinance establishing RAHP Guidelines and an ordinance authorizing RAHP Interlocal Agreements. The ordinances were passed on July 21, 2003, and signed into law on July 30, 2003. The RAHP will allocate revenues collected by King County pursuant to Substitute House Bill 2060, passed by the state legislature last year. The RAHP guidelines are flexible, allowing for the funding of many different types of housing projects, including ownership housing, permanent rental housing, transitional housing and shelters for very low-income households. Funds generated by SHB 2060 can be used for new construction, acquisition of property and rehabilitation. The program also provides a limited amount of operation and maintenance funds for existing transitional housing projects and shelters serving very low-income households. Eligible applicants for the RAHP can be non -profits, for -profits, housing authorities and local governments. I encourage all cities in King County to sign the RAHP Agreement, in order to adhere to the language of the SHB 2060 legislation, which states that the funds are to be administered "...according to an interlocal agreement between the county and the cities within the county...". Appropriate action by ordinance or resolution of a jurisdiction's council is required for the agreement to be effective. Council action should be taken by the end of November 2003, in time for allocation decisions for the RAHP in December. The RAHP guidelines allow a city to participate as much or as little as desired in the program. • Staff Level: All cities are invited to appoint a staff person, including A Regional Coalition for Housing (ARCH) staff representing particular cities, to participate in the RAHP/HOME Working Group. On the working group, staff will review projects from their jurisdictions and work with the King County Housing and Community Development staff to make KING COUNTY COURTHOUSE 516 THIRD AVENUE, ROOM 400 SEATTLE, WA 98104-3271 (206) 296-4040 296-0194 FAX 296-0200 TDD E-mail: ron.sims@metrokc.gov ® King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer and complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act Mayors, City Managers, CDBG and HOME Consortium Coordinators September 1.2, 2003 Page 2 funding recommendations to the inter jurisdictional Joint Recommendations Committee, currently chaired by Mayor Ava Frisinger of the City of Issaquah. A city that participates in ARCH may elect to defer participation of their staff and allow ARCH staff to represent them, if desired. It would still be beneficial for a city to sign the RAHP Interlocal Agreement even if that city does not elect to participate in the staff work group so that the structure of the program in King County will adhere as closely as possible to the language of SHB 2060. • If staff from your city have not participated in the HOME Working Group but would like to participate in the RAHP, please contact A] D'Alessandro in the King County Housing and Community Development Program, at 206-205-6562. • Elected Official/Department Director Level: Your city may also have the opportunity to have a representative on the Joint Recommendations Committee (JRC). If you would like more information on the JRC and how cities' representatives are appointed, please contact Mayor Frisinger, at 425-837-3021, or Jackie MacLean, Director of King County's Department of Community and Human Services, at 206-296-7689. Please be aware that RAHP Guidelines include allocation targets for projects to be located throughout the region based on three large sub -regional areas: Seattle, East/North County, and South County. Project location is not necessarily tied to whether a particular jurisdiction has signed the Interlocal Agreement. If your city decides not to sign the Agreement, please use the enclosed form to state in writing that your jurisdiction declines to participate in the RAHP. If you have any questions regarding the RAMP Guidelines, the Interlocal Agreement, or the enclosed form, please contact Cheryl Markham, RASP Planner, in the Housing and Community Development Program, at 206-205- 1417, or by e-mail, at cheryl.markham@metrokc.gov. Please return your signed Agreement or form to the King County Housing and Community Development Program, 821 Second Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98104, Attention: Cheryl Markham. Thank you for your assistance in making this regional program a success. Sincerely, QR King County Executive Enclosures CC The Honorable Ava Frisinger, Mayor, City of Issaquah Katie Hong, Office of Housing, City of Seattle Jackie MacLean, Director, King County Department of Community and Human Services REGIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT An Agreement for the use of SHB 2060 Local Low -Income Housing Funds in King County THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between King County, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of , hereinafter referred to as the "City", said parties to the Agreement each being a unit of general local government of the State of Washington. RECITALS WHEREAS, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, hereinafter referred to as the "CPPs", developed pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act, have established standards for cities to plan for their share of regional growth and affordable housing; and WHEREAS, to implement the CPPs, the King County Growth Management Planning Council appointed a public -private Housing Finance Task Force in 1994, hereinafter referred to as the "HFTF", to recommend potential fund sources for affordable housing for existing low- income residents and for meeting the affordable housing targets for future growth; and housing needs and policies, and pursuant to the eligible activities listed in the SHB 2060 legislation; and WHEREAS, existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreements or Joint Agreements between King County and cities in the King County Community Development Block Grant Consortium, hereinafter referred to as the "CDBG Agreements", and/or existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreements between King County and cities in the King County HOME Investment Partnerships Program Consortium, hereinafter referred to as the "HOME Agreements", are not modified by this Regional Affordable Housing Program Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and King County agree that affordable housing is a regional issue, that cooperation between the Cities and the County is beneficial to the region, and that a regional approach to utilizing the SHB 2060 funds will allow those funds to be used in the most productive manner; and WHEREAS, it is mutually beneficial and desirable to enter into a cooperative agreement in order to administer the SHB 2060 revenue as a regional fund, as authorized by the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34, and, as required by SHI3 2060; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: RAHP ICA / Page 3 II. General Agreement The purpose of this agreement is to establish the "Regional Affordable Housing Program", hereinafter "RAHP", to be administered by King County in cooperation with Cities and Towns within the County that choose to participate in the program. The local portion of SHB 2060 revenue shall be administered as a regional fund by the King County Housing and Community Development Program in a manner that is consistent with countywide and local housing needs and policies The City and the County agree to cooperate in undertaking RAHP activities. III. General Administration, Distribution and Use of the RAHP. A. Expansion and role of the JRC. The JRC shall be the body that reviews and adopts annual RAHP fund allocations and related allocation polices, consistent with the King County Council -adopted RAHP Guidelines, the Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plans of the King County Consortium and the City of Seattle, and other local housing plans, as applicable. The membership of the JRC, as authorized by the CDBG and HOME Agreements, and as defined herein, shall be expanded to include an appointment from the City of Seattle. The Seattle JRC representative will attend meetings that concern the SHB 2060 fund and will be entitled to vote solely on SHB 2060 issues and not on other King County Consortium . RAHP ICA / Page 5 D. Role of the RAHP/HOME Working Group. The RAHP/HOME Working Group shall make annual RAHP fund allocation and related allocation policy recommendations to the JRC. The RAHP/HOME Working Group recommendations shall be consistent with the King County Council -adopted RAHP Guidelines, the Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plans of the King County Consortium and the City of Seattle, and other local housing plans, as applicable. Pursuant to the RAHP Guidelines, the RAHP/HOME Working Group shall examine the percentages of RAHP funds distributed to the subregions of the County following the 2004 and 2005 funding rounds, and shall recommend actions to achieve geographic equity by the time the RAHP Agreement expires in 2006. City and County staff will work together to take actions to achieve geographic equity in the distribution of RAHP funds. E. Administration of RAHP Programs. The King County Housing and Community Development ("HCD") Program staff shall distribute RAHP funds pursuant to the allocations adopted annually by the JRC, and shall administer the program pursuant to the RAHP Agreement and the King County Council -adopted RAHP Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit #l. King County HCD staff shall provide the RAHP/HOME Working Group, the JRC, and participating jurisdictions with an annual report that provides information about the capital housing projects that were awarded RAHP funds in that year; in addition to RAHP ICA / Page 7 regions of the County by the end of this 4-year Agreement, as specified by a formula contained in the RAH? Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit #1. I. General Use of Funds. The local portion of the SHB 2060 revenue shall be utilized to meet regional housing priorities for households at or below 50% of area median income, as established in the RAHP Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit #1. J. Compliance with Fair Housing Laws. Parties to this agreement must take actions necessary to ensure compliance with the Federal Fair Housing Act, as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other applicable state and local fair housing laws. IV. Agreement Duration This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect through December 31, 2006, when this agreement will expire. The 2060 Planning Group will re -convene in the spring of 2006 to evaluate the RAHP and to recommend whether the RAHP Guidelines and the RAHP Interlocal Agreement should be re -negotiated or renewed in their current formats. V. General Matters and Recording A. No separate legal or administrative entity is created by this Agreement. Neither the JRC, the RAHP/HOME Working Group, nor the 2060 Planning Group are RAHP ICA / Page 9 Regional Affordable Housing Program Guidelines Guidelines for the Administration and Allocation of SHB 2060 Local Low -Income Housing Funds In King County A. Introduction The provisions of Substitute House Bill 2060 became effective in Washington State on June 13, 2002. SHB 2060 created a document recording fee on certain documents to be utilized for low- income housing. Administration of the fund is shared between local governments and the State. The local portion of SHB 2060 funds is to be administered pursuant to a cooperative agreement between the County and the Cities and Towns within the County. The work of the Housing Finance Task Force ("HFTF'), appointed by the King County Growth Management Planning Council in 1994, led to the passage of SHB 2060. In recognition_ of the recommendations made by the HFTF, a SHB 2060 Planning Group was invited to come together to produce guidelines for the King County SHB 2060 funds. The King County SHB 2060 Planning Group' is made up of City representatives, County 1 City representatives included staff from the cities of. Burien, Tukwila, Kent, Federal Way, Redmond, Kirkland, Issaquah, Shoreline, Covington, Seatac, Auburn, Seattle, Bellevue and ARCH Housing organization representatives included staff from the following: Seattle -King County Housing Development Consortium, Impact Capital, South King County Multi -Service Center, Hopelink, Fremont Public Association, Seattle Habitat for Humanity, South King County Habitat for Humanity, Friends of Youth, The Salvation Army, Community Psychiatric Clinic, Lifelong Aids Alliance, St. Andrews Housing Group, Housing Resource Group, The interjurisdictional Joint Recommendations Committee (JRC), as defined in the RAH? Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, hereinafter "RAH? Agreement" shall be the body that reviews and adopts RAHP funding allocations and related allocation policies. The JRC will be expanded, pursuant to the RAHP Agreement, to include representation from the City of Seattle on RAHP matters. Allocations and related policies adopted by the JRC must be consistent with these RAHP Guidelines, the Consolidated Plans of the King County Consortium and the City of Seattle, and other local housing plans, as applicable. 2. Annual Fund Allocation Recommendations The existing HOME Working Group, as defined in the RAHP Agreement, shall be renamed the RAHP/HOME Working Group and shall be expanded to include a staff representative from the City of Seattle. City of Seattle staff will participate solely in making RAHP recommendations. The RAHP/HOME Working Group will work together to make RAHP fund allocation recommendations and related allocation policy recommendations to the JRC: • King County HCD staff will review all RAHP applications and make preliminary funding recommendations on them. RAMP Guidelines/ Page 3 3) South Subregion — south urban and rural areas, including 66% of unincorporated King County b. Formula for Subregional Allocation Targets Each subregion will have, a targeted percentage of the RAIIP funds, including the interest on the RAHP funds, allocated to projects within the subregion over the 4-year period of the RAHP Guidelines and the RAHP Agreement. Each subregion will receive allocations to projects within the subregion that are equal to or greater than 95%, of the subregions' allocation target by December 31, 2006. The formula for allocating RAHP funds to the subregions is as follows: • One half of the RAHP funds shall be targeted for allocation amongst the three subregions based on each subregion's relative share of total existing need for affordable housing. Existing need shall be determined by the percentage of low- income households paying more than 30% of their income for housing in the subregion, according to the 2000 U.S. Census data3. • One half of the RAHP funds shall be targeted for allocation amongst the three subregions based on the subregions' growth targets for future need, as established through the Growth Management Planning Council. Future need shall be RAHP Guidelines/ Page 5 If any subregions have received allocations under 95% of their target allocation after the first two funding cycles, the working group will adjust the allocation targets of such subregion(s) in the third and/or fourth funding cycles, as needed. In addition, the Working Group will propose strategies and actions, for review by the JRC, that are designed to increase the percentage of RAHP funds spent in those subregion(s). Staff of the jurisdictions that are parties to the RAHP Agreement will work to implement actions that will aid in achieving geographic equity in RAH? allocations by December 31, 2006. D. Use of the RAHP Funds 1. RAHP Priorities Top Priority: Capital funds for the acquisition, rehabilitation and/or new construction of eligible housing projects or units within housing projects. New construction is not eligible if the low-income housing vacancy rate for all of King County exceeds 10%5 Second Priority: Building operations and maintenance funds for transitional housing projects or transitional units within housing projects that were built with Housing affordable housing target for low-income households of all King County jurisdictions, including unincorporated King County. 5 The low-income housing vacancy rate for each county will be established by the State, pursuant to the SHB 2060 legislation. RAHP Guidelines/ Page 7 Homeless families and individuals, including youth • Special needs populations, including seniors • Disabled households or households with a disabled member Eligible Applicants • Nonprofit organizations • Housing Authorities • Local governments • For -profit entities are only eligible for capital funds in the top priority. This is due to the language of the SHB 2060 legislation, which restricts operations and maintenance funds to projects "built with Housing Trust Funds". For -profit entities are not eligible for WA State Housing Trust Funds. Eligible use of RAHP Funds - eligible uses of funds are subject to the RAHP priorities listed above. Capital funds: • Acquisition of land for a housing project or units in a project that will serve eligible population(s). • New construction of a housing project or units in a project that will serve eligible population(s). • Acquisition of a housing project or units in a project that will serve eligible population(s). RAHP Guidelines/ Page 9 1. RAHP Capital Funds RAHP capital funds will be administered by the King County HCD's Housing Finance Program (HFP), in conjunction with other fund sources administered by HFP. The HFP will staff the RAHP/HOME Working Group and work with staff of the participating cities in King County to develop RAHP funding allocation recommendations and related policy recommendations for JRC review and adoption. The HFP will distribute RAHP funds through contracts pursuant to the allocations adopted by the JRC, and will generate an annual RAHP report that provides information about the projects that received funding in the current year, as well as the status of projects awarded RAHP funds in prior year(s). By request of the 2060 Planning Group, the HFP staff will apply the terms of the King County Housing Opportunity Fund ("HOF") to RAHP contracts, with the exception of the following: 0 to the extent that there are differences between the HOF guidelines and RAHP guidelines, the RAHP guidelines will apply; • a financial match by the local government where a housing project is to be located is not required, but is encouraged. RAHP Guidelines/ Page 11 projects that are simultaneously applying for WA State Housing Trust Fund capital funds and shelters receiving Emergency Shelter Assistance Program ("ESAP") funds. Therefore, the local RAHP O&M fund will prioritize existing transitional housing projects and shelters that do not receive ESAP funds. Following the adoption of the RAHP Guidelines and the RAHP Agreement by the jurisdictions in King County that elect to participate in the RAHP, the HHP will convene a focus group of city staff and stakeholders to further develop the parameters of the RAHP O&M fund and the RAHP O&M Request for Proposals. The RAHP O&M funds will be awarded in multi -year commitments and will have minimum and maximum grant amounts, however, the minimum and maximum amounts and other O&M fund details will be determined by the O&M focus group and will be reviewed by the JRC. The HHP will invite city staff and other stakeholders to participate on the panel to review applications for the RAHP O&M funds. The review panel will recommend O&M fund awards to the JRC for final adoption. RAHP Guidelines/ Page 13 Statement of Non -Participation in the Regional Affordable Housing Program The city of declines to participate in the Regional Affordable Housing Program ("RAMP") and will not sign the current RAHP Interlocal Agreement, which will be in effect through December 2006. We will contact the King County Housing and Community Development Program if we decide to participate in the program in the future. Reason for decision to decline participation (optional): Signed: Title Date Please return to: Cheryl Markham RAHP Planner King County HCD 821 2„ d Ave., Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 FAX: 206-296-0229 e-mail: cheryl.markham@metrokc.gov ,' CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI N: A , Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (x-6581) Consent..............X X Public Hearing.. Subject: Maplewood Highlands Annexation Public Meeting on Correspondence.. December 22, 2003 Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Information........ . Recommended Action: Council concur Approvals: Legal Dept ......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is in receipt of a 10 % Notice of Intent petition to initiate a direct petition method of annexation for approximately 10.88-acres located on the half block immediately north of the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. It is bounded by 144' Avenue SE on the west, NE 2ad Street on the north, and Lyons Avenue NE on the east. State law requires that the Council hold a public meeting within 60 days of the filing of the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition to consider the proposed annexation and decide whether it will accept, modify, or reject it. If Council accepts the annexation, it shall authorize the circulation of the new 50% direct petition to annex. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set a Public Meeting date for December 22, 2003 to consider this proposed annexation. EDNSP/PAA/Annexations/Maplewood Highlands Annexation/Agenda Bill/ de 11 /26/03 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (x-6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Maplewood Highlands Annexation 10% Notice of Intent Petition ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex approximately 10.88-acres to the City of Renton by direct petition (Figure 1, Vicinity Map). State law requires that the Council hold a Public Meeting with the annexation proponents to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposal, whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness, and, whether to require the simultaneous adoption of zoning. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the Notice of Intent. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration recommends that Council take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): • Authorize the circulation of the 50% Petition to Annex for the proposed expanded annexation; • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area assume a proportional share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The applicants are proposing to annex a portion of what was previously the proposed Wooford Annexation. That annexation was one of those adversely affected by the state Supreme Court's March 2002 decision invalidating the direction petition method based upon assessed value. The current proposal only includes the area north of Maplewood Heights Elementary School to the City boundary to the north and east. Maplewood Heights Elementary School is expected to be annexed independently. If this annexation is approved by Council and its residents, R-5 zoning would presumably be applied at the time it came into the City. Maplewood Highlands Annexation 10% Notice of Intent Petition 2 12/01/03 1. Location: The proposed 10.88 acre square shaped Maplewood Highlands annexation area is located immediately north of the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. It is bounded by 140 Avenue SE on the west, NE 2nd Street on the north, and, Lyons Avenue NE, on the east. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed valuation with current development is $2,558,100. 3. Natural Features: The site is generally flat sloping slightly to the southeast. There are no known environmental sensitive areas associated with the site 4. Existing Land Uses: The majority of the site is currently developed but at only a density of about 1.5 units per net acre. Existing development includes fifteen single-family detached dwellings with one dwelling on each of the fifteen parcels that make up the annexation site. 5. Existing Zoning: The site is currently zoned R-4, 4 units per gross acre, in King County. 6. Comprehensive Plan: The subject annexation site is designated Urban Residential 4-12 units per acre in King County. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation site Residential Low Density (RLD). This designation allows three zones in this area: RC (Resource Conservation) at 1 du/10 acres; R-l; and R-5 zoning. 7. Public Services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the proposed annexation appears to represent a logical extension of their respective services and systems. • Water Utility: The proposed annexation area is located in King County Water District No. 90's water service area. No additional staff are anticipated as a consequence. Surface Water: The proposed annexation is part of the May Creek sub -basin. Because the site is partially developed this division believes there is a higher than normal likelihood that it could develop with future short plats which would be exempt from storm water detention requirements. Because this could have a negative impact on downstream erosion and flooding staff are recommending that all new development be required to provide Level 2 flow control and basic water quality per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Staff also notes a small intermittent stream that crosses 144"' Avenue SE and believe there may be wetlands associated with it. Costs for maintaining existing and future public storm water system infrastructure are negligible and no increasing in staffing levels is projected. • Wastewater: The City is the designated sewer service provider for the East Renton Plateau PAA which includes this area. Staff recommended adding Maplewood Heights Elementary School and adjacent road right-of-ways. (Staff note that the school is being processed as a separate annexation and the 1440' Avenue SE right-of- way is now included.) Parks: Staff notes that there currently is a shortfall of parks and recreation facilities in the area. However, they note that with the transfer of King County's Maplewood Park the need for a community park would be met. Estimated costs of improving this 40- acre park are $5,400,000. Staff have calculated an estimated one time cost of $23,429 as the fair share cost that could be attributed to this annexation, above and beyond revenues that might accrue to the City from mitigation fees. Fire: The City currently serves the annexation area under contract with Fire District No. 25. Upon annexation the City will serve the whole area. • Police: The Police Department supports the proposed boundaries of this annexation but note that this, like all annexations, will likely increase the number of calls for H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Maplewood Highlands\10% Issue Paper.doc\d Maplewood Highlands Annexation 10% Notice of Intent Petition 3 11/26/03 • Fire: The City currently serves the annexation area under contract with Fire District No. 25. Upon annexation the City will serve the whole area. • Police: The Police Department supports the proposed boundaries of this annexation but note that this, like all annexations, will likely increase the number of calls for service. They state that the accumulative impact of these annexations could eventually require additional staff. • Public Works Maintenance: The annual estimated cost of maintaining new streets within the proposed annexation area is $1,854. This assumes approximately 1,484 linear feet of new roads to serve an estimated 34 homes in the are at full development. • Transportation: The Transportation Systems Division reported that the proposed annexation raised no concerns for them. This because the costs of upgrading existing access streets serving the proposed annexation and those within it would be borne by those developing properties here, rather than the City. The only expenses the City would incur from a transportation standpoint would be those associated with new signage and pavement markings, street lighting and maintenance costs. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support this proposed annexation. The subject properties are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are subject to development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-380). The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to the area (Policy LU-385) with the exception of water which will be provided by Water District No. 90. Policy LU-388 states that, in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed area for annexation abuts the city boundary on 50 % of its perimeter. 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation does not split or change existing neighborhoods. The whole half block north of the elementary school is being proposed for annexation. b. Use of Physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed annexation abuts the City of Renton along its northern and eastern boundaries. In addition, it is bounded by streets to the west, north and east. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; The proposed annexation area is not split in terms of its service areas. As a result its boundaries are considered reasonable by all reviewing departments. It is in Renton's Wastewater Utility service area, King County Water District No. 90's water service area, and the Renton School District #403. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Maplewood Highlands\10% Issue Papendoc\d Maplewood Highlands Annexation 10% Notice of Intent Petition 4 11/26/03 Not applicable. The annexation site has regular boundaries and abuts the City on two sides. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; There are no known inactive special purpose districts in this area. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; This annexation is not being proposed to adjust what are considered to be impractical boundaries. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Area boundary. The county has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the this proposed annexation are designated for long term productive agricultural use in either the King County or Renton Comprehensive Plans. CONCLUSION: The proposal is essentially consistent with City policies related to annexation as well as Boundary Review board objectives and criteria for annexations. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified. The City already provides fire services to Fire District No. 25, under contract, for example, so there should be no change in service for the fifteen parcels currently served by this district. Water service will be provided by King County Water District No. 90 and the school district boundaries will not change as a result of this proposed annexation. An initial fiscal analysis was conducted by staff for this proposed annexation. Assuming an assessed value of $400,000 per new home and 24 new homes, it indicated an annual cost of $1,049 to the City under current projected revenues and costs, and a one time estimated cost of $23,429 for parks acquisition and/or improvements. A more detailed analysis may be conducted following receipt of the County's certification of the 50% Petition to annex, if Council authorizes its circulation. Attachments cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Maplewood Highlands\10% Issue Paper.doc\d MERRITT II ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET ................... ................... Revi?r.... . ................... Units Population AV Existing dev. 15 37 $2,558,100 Full dev. 34 85 $9,600,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household $400,000 AV / new unit $220,000 AV /existing unit Existing Full Rate Regular levy $8,157 $30,612 3.18871 Excess le $227 $851 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate(per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $130.24 $299.20 Liquor Board profits $5.04 $186.48 $428.40 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $535.02 $1,229.10 Fuel tax - arterials $6.47 $239.39 $549.95 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.36 $13.32 $30.60 Total $1,104.45 $2,537.25 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $1,511.82 $3,473.10 Utility tax** $133.20 $1,998.00 $4,528.80 Fines & forfeits* $18.33 $678.21 $1,558.05 Total $4,188.03 $9,559.95 Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.23 $8.40 $19.30 Public Defender $3.13 $115.96 $266.39 Jail $7.19 $266.10 $611.32 Subtotal $390.46 $897.01 Court/legal/admin. $57.08 $2,111.96 $4,851.80 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $551.30 $1,266.50 Police $270.00 $9,990.00 $22,950.00 Road maintenance** N/A $0.00 $2,644 Fire*** $1.25 $3,197.63 $12,000.00 Total $16,241.35 $44,609.31 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) C>r*tirtisGoSts' Parks acquisition &development (from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: Total revenues Existing Full "i$43s$6 Total ongoing costs Existing:: $ii24�3 Fu I I $4i931 Net fiscal impact Fu Existing ':��2�6�0 $23,429.00 Total one-time costs: $3{)t} Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (x-6581) Subject: Merritt II Annexation Public Meeting on December 22, 2003 Exhibits: Issue Paper Recommended Action: Council concur Al #: o 0 For Agenda of: Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept ......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... i Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is in receipt of a 10 % Notice of Intent petition to initiate a direct petition method of annexation for approximately 20.59-acres located to the northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision. It is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100' Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142" Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. State law requires that the Council hold a public meeting within 60 days of the filing of the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition to consider the proposed annexation and decide whether it will accept, modify, or reject it. If Council accepts the annexation, it shall authorize the circulation of the new 50 % direct petition to annex. Because the site was prezoned to R-1, one unit per net acre, in 1997, the Council is not required to consider future zoning for this annexation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set a Public Meeting date for December 22, 2003 to consider this annexation. M EDNSP/PAA/Annexations/Merritt II Annexation/Agenda Bill/ dke 12/01/03 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: November 26, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (x-6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Merritt II Annexation 10% Notice of Intent Petition ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex approximately 20.59-acres to the City of Renton by direct petition (Figure 1, Vicinity Map). State law requires that the Council hold a Public Meeting with the annexation proponents to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposal, whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness, and, whether to require the simultaneous adoption of zoning. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the Notice of Intent. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration recommends that Council take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): • Authorize the circulation of the 50% Petition to Annex for the proposed expanded annexation; • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area assume a proportional share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The applicants originally proposed a much smaller annexation, now referred to as Merritt I so as not confuse it with the current proposal. This annexation request was for 4.89 acres and only included the easternmost parcel of the five parcels now under consideration. The applicant for the former annexation has requested that it be withdrawn concurrently with the authorization to circulate the 50% petition for the Merritt II annexation. Because the annexation site was prezoned R-1 in 1997, there is no need to address future zoning at this time. Upon annexation, R- 1 zoning would automatically be applied. Merritt II Annexation 10% Notice of Intent 12/01/03 2 Location: The proposed 20.59 acre irregularly shaped Merritt II is located northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision. It is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"' Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142nd Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed valuation with current development is $1,953,300. Natural Features: The site generally slopes from a high point in the southwest corner of 127.87 meters to a low point of 93.78 meters near SE May Valley Road. A ridge runs diagonally through the middle of the site with plateaus in the southwest, north and eastern portions. The area is considered to be within a high erosion hazard area. May Creek intersects the northern tip of the 20.59 acre site. 4. Existing Land Uses: Existing development includes five single-family detached dwellings with one dwelling on each of the five parcels that make up the annexation site. 5. Existin Zoning: As noted above the proposed annexation was included in an earlier (1997) prezoning of this area to the R-1 zone (1 du/net acre), pursuant to RCW 35.A.14.330 and RCW 35.A.14.340. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation area Residential Low Density (RLD) (formerly Residential Rural). This designation is consistent with the existing R-1 prezoning since it allows three zones in this area: RC (Resource Conservation) at 1 du/10 acres; R-1; and R-5 zoning. 7. Public Services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the proposed annexation appears to represent a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Water Utility: The two largest of the four western parcels of this proposed annexation are in Renton's Water Utility service area. The eastern (Merritt) parcel is in Water District No. 90's service area and northern two smaller parcels are in the Coal Creek Utility District water service boundary. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this annexation. Surface Water: The proposed annexation is located in the Green Creek sub -basin of the May Creek Basin. The site drains to the May Valley portion of May Creek, where staff not there are existing flooding, water quality and fish habitat problems. May Creek flows across the northern tip of the proposed annexation. Because the City adopted the May Creek Basin Plan which requires full mitigation for future increases in surface water runoff from new development draining into May Valley, future development may have to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual flow control standards. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this annexation. Wastewater: The City is the designated sewer service provider for the East Renton Plateau PAA. • Parks: Staff notes that there currently is a shortfall of parks, trails and recreation facilities in the area. They believe that there is a need for both a community and neighborhood park in the area. Staff have calculated an estimated one time cost of $15 as the fair share cost that could be attributed to this annexation, above and beyond revenues that might accrue to the City from mitigation fees. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Merritt #2\10%o Issue Paper.doc\d Merritt II Annexation 10% Notice of Intent 11/26/03 Police: The Police Department supports the proposed boundaries of this annexation but note that this, like all annexations, will likely increase the number of calls for service. The accumulative impact of these annexations could eventually require additional staff. • Public Works Maintenance: The annual estimated cost of maintaining new streets within the proposed annexation area is $2,644. This assumes approximately 2,115 linear feet of new roads to serve an estimated 17 homes in the area. Transportation: The Transportation Systems Division reported that the proposed annexation raised no concerns for them. This because the costs of upgrading existing access streets serving the proposed annexation and those within it would be borne by those developing properties here, rather than the City. The only expenses the City would incur from a transportation standpoint would be those associated with new signage and pavement markings, street lighting and maintenance costs. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support this proposed annexation. The subject properties are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are subject to development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-380). The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to the area (Policy LU-385). Policy LU-388 states that, in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed area for annexation abuts the city boundary on only about 20 % of its perimeter. Future annexations nearby, as a consequence of this annexation are expected to have a much higher percentage of their perimeters abutting the City limits. 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation does not split or change existing neighborhoods. The Stonegate neighborhood to the east will not be impacted by this annexation and all property owners within the proposed annexation have signed the 10% Notice of Intent Petition to Commence Annexation. At an existing density of one unit per four acres there is no established "neighborhood" per se, in this unincorporated area. b. Use of Physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed annexation abuts the City of Renton along its eastern boundary and a portion of its southern boundary. The shape of this proposed annexation the result of the accumulated shapes of the five parcels that make it up. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; The proposed annexation area is split with the western four parcels within the Renton School District and the eastern (Merritt) parcel within the Issaquah School District. Similarly the western four parcels are within Fire District No. 25 and the eastern parcel is within Fire District No. 10. A similar situation occurs with water service with the western four parcels within Renton's Water Service Area and the eastern H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Merritt #2\10% Issue Paper.doc\d Merritt II Annexation 10% Notice of Intent 11/26/03 (Merritt) parcel in Water District No. 90's water service area. All five parcels are within Renton's Wastewater Service Area with the nearest sewer line in the Lyons Avenue NE right-of-way. These boundaries have been approved by the various districts and adopted by King County. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposed boundaries are not "abnormally" irregular. In order to not adversely impact existing neighborhoods yet provide access to city services and in particular wastewater, these boundaries are reasonable for the interim. We anticipate future annexations will infill any existing gaps or indentations. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; There are no known inactive special purpose districts in this area. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; 4 This annexation is not being proposed to adjust what are considered to be impractical boundaries. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Area boundary. The county has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the this proposed annexation are designated for long term productive agricultural use in either the King County or Renton Comprehensive Plans. CONCLUSION: The proposal is essentially consistent with City policies related to annexation as well as Boundary Review board objectives and criteria for annexations. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified. The City already provides fire services to Fire District No. 25, under contract, for example, so there should be no change in service for the four parcels currently served by this district. Water service will be provided by the City to the western four parcels and District No. 90 will provide service to the eastern (Merritt) parcel. School district boundaries will not change as a result of this proposed annexation. An initial fiscal analysis was conducted by staff for this proposed annexation. Assuming an assessed value of $400,000 per new home, it indicated an annual surplus of $2,208 to the City under current projected revenues and costs, and a one time estimated cost of $10,866 for parks acquisition and/or improvements. A more detailed analysis may. be conducted following receipt of the County's certification of the 50% Petition to annex, if Council authorizes its circulation. Attachments RTI)NSP\PAA\AnnexationsWerritt #2\10% Issue Paper.doc\d Merritt II Annexation 10% Notice of Intent 11/26/03 cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Merritt #2\10% Issue Paper.doc\d MERRITT II ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Hovey ................... ................... Gists ::: ' ' Units Population AV Existing dev. 5 13 $1,953,300 Full dev. 17 43 $6,800,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household $400,000 AV / new unit $220,000 AV /existing unit Existing Full Rate Regular levy $6,229 $21,683 3.18871 Excess levy $173 $603 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate (per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $45.76 $149.60 Liquor Board profits $5.04 $65.52 $214.20 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $187.98 $614.55 Fuel tax - arterials $6.47 $84.11 $274.98 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.36 $4.68 $15.30 Total $388.05 $1,268.63 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $531.18 $1,736.55 Utility tax** $133.20 $666.00 $2,264.40 Fines & forfeits* $18.33 $238.29 $779.03 Total $1,435.47 $4,779.98 Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.23 $2.95 $9.65 Public Defender $3.13 $40.74 $133.20 Jail $7.19 $93.50 $305.66 Subtotal $137.19 $448.50 Court/legal/admin. $57.08 $742.04 $2,425.90 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $193.70 $633.25 Police $270.00 $3,510.00 $11,475.00 Road maintenance** N/A $0.00 $2,644 Fire*** $1.25 $2,441.63 $8,500.00 Total $7,024.55 $26,126.65 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) r3e'tirh e costs Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA): 77 Other one-time costs: Total revenues Existing,::::.,,: .................. Full:::: ;$383.34.85 .................... Total ongoing costs Existing.b ............:..:.... .................... Full $ 6:f 5 .................... .................... Net fiscal impact Existing::'::; 0& $10,866.00 .................... Total one-time costs:i086gE} Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AT #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems December 8, 2003 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Nathan A. Jones, x-7217 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Correspondence.. Citywide Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program Ordinance ............. Funding Agreement with Washington State Department Resolution............ X of Transportation (WSDOT) Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Study Sessions...... Issue Paper Information......... Resolution Agreement Recommended Action: Council concur Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated... $40,986 State funding Total Project Budget $64,200 City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: This agreement releases State funds to support activities the City of Renton is required to do under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law. This is an ongoing program and the contract is renewed every two years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Transportation Division staff recommends the Council approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the State for implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of $40,986. H:Trans/Admin/Agenda2003/WSDOT CTR Agendabill CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ��' Jesse Tanner, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermai NBministrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, extension 7217 SUBJECT: Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) 2003-2005 Funding Contract ISSUE: Since the State CTR Law was passed in 1991, every two years, the City of Renton enters into an agreement with the State of Washington Department of Transportation to accept money from the State. The State money is used to fund the City efforts in support of activities mandated by the Washington State CTR Law. RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Systems Division staff recommends the Council approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the State for implementation of Citywide CTR Program in the amount of $40,986. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton implements a program in accordance with the State CTR Law to monitor Renton employers with CTR-affected worksites for progress and compliance. This law was enacted as part of the Washington State Clean Air Act to provide measures that would improve air quality and manage congestion by encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicle (SOV) commute travel through the use of incentives to employees at businesses with 100 or more employees arriving to work between 6 and 9AM. Renton contracts each year with King County Metro Transit Division (KC Metro) to provide staff who offer technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the CTR Law. The funds provided by the State cover the expenses of the contract between KC Metro and the City of Renton and City staff administrative labor. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) ENTITLED "COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION IMPLEMENTATION." WHEREAS, the City .of Renton, pursuant to the Commute Trip Reduction Act, is required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to the City; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), by law, distributes these funds; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the WSDOT will distribute commute trip reduction funds to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with WSDOT entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Implementation." 1 RESOLUTION NO. _ PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1001:8/11/03 day of Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 2003. day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 Washington State Department of Transportation 310 Maple Park Avenue PO Box 47387 Olympia, WA 98504-7387 :ey Contact Person: T. J. Johnson Agreement Start Date Completion 11 Number I Date GCA3657 I July 1, 2003 June 30, 2005 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 Key Contact Person: Nathan Jones Emnlover Federal ID #: 91-6001271 Project AmountIlProject Title Commute Trip Reduction This Agreement . is made and entered into this 1st day of July, 2003, between the Washington State Department of Transportation, acting by and through its Secretary of Transportation, (hereinafter called "WSDOT") and City of Renton (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") and said parties WITNESS THAT: WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.521 through 70.94.551 requires cities, counties and towns containing "major employers," in counties with populations over 150,000, to develop ordinances, plans and programs to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and single occupant vehicle (SOV) commute trips, and thereby reduce vehicle -related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use; WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.541 (2) provides for technical assistance to counties, cities, and towns in developing and implementing Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) plans and programs; WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.544 provides for distribution of funds for local CTR implementation efforts; WHEREAS, WSDOT desires to achieve trip reduction in order to improve the efficiency of the state transportation system and the quality of life for citizens of the State of Washington; WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature's delay in approving continued funding for the CTR program requires this contract to be effective retroactive to July 1, 2003 to preserve continuity of program funding. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises herein contained, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: Section 1 Purpose of Agreement The purpose of this. Agreement is for WSDOT to provide funding to the Contractor to be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the requirements of RCW 70.94.521, et. seq. and to implement tasks as described in Exhibit II, Scope of Work. This Agreement consists of the terms and conditions, and Exhibits I, II and III, which by this reference are incorporated herein. Section 2 Scope of Work The Contractor and WSDOT will perform all their designated tasks under this Agreement as described in Exhibit H, Scope of Work. Section 3 Time for Beginning and Completion The work to be performed under this Agreement shall commence July 1, 2003, and terminate on June 30, 2005, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. Section 4 Reimbursement and Payment WSDOT shall reimburse the Contractor for eligible expenditures not to exceed $40,986 during the first fiscal year of the contract period. The maximum amount of funding for the Contractor was determined using the methodology contained in Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. WSDOT will reimburse the Contractor only for actual and eligible direct project costs. Payment will be made on a reimbursable basis. Payment is subject to the submission to, and approval by, WSDOT of properly prepared invoices accompanied by progress reports and financial summaries. The Contractor shall submit an invoice (state form A-19) or WSDOT approved invoice format to WSDOT in order to receive reimbursement. The Contractor shall submit invoices up to four (4) times per fiscal year, or up to eight (8) times during the course of this contract. The Contractor shall submit a final invoice to WSDOT no later than July 15, 2005. Any payment request received after July 15, 2005 or fifteen (15) days of the termination date, whichever is applicable, will not be eligible for reimbursement. Within thirty (30) days after receiving the invoice and upon approval, WSDOT shall remit to the Contractor a warrant for payment. All invoices and warrants shall be based on and paid on actual work performed and actual costs incurred up to the maximum amount identified in this Agreement. Section 5 Project Records The Contractor agrees to establish and maintain for the project either a separate set of accounts or accounts within the framework of an established accounting system, in order to sufficiently and properly reflect all eligible direct and indirect project costs claimed to have been incurred in the performance of this Agreement. Such accounts are referred to herein collectively as the "Project Account". All costs claimed against the Project Account must be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, and payment vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. Section 6 Progress Reports The Contractor shall submit to WSDOT progress reports as described in Exhibit H, Scope of Work, so that WSDOT may adequately and accurately assess the progress made by the Contractor and third parties to this Agreement in implementing RCW 70.94.521 et. seq. These reports shall be submitted to WSDOT along with any request for reimbursement submitted pursuant to Section 4, Reimbursement and Payment. Page 2 GCA3657 Section 7 Audits, Inspections, and Records Retention WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives shall have full access to, and the right to, examine during normal business hours and as often as they deem necessary, all of the Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and other matters covered by this Agreement. In order to facilitate any audits and inspections, the Contractor shall retain all documents, papers, accounting records, and other materials pertaining to this Agreement for six years from the date of completion of the project or the project final payment date. However, in case of audit or litigation extending past that six years period, then the Contractor must retain all records until the audit or litigation is completed. The Contractor shall be responsible to assure that it, WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives, retain comparable audit rights with respect to subcontractors to the Contractor within the scope of this Agreement. Section 8 Agreement Modifications 1. Either party may request changes to this Agreement, including changes in the Scope of Work. Such changes that are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated as written amendments to the Agreement. No variation or alteration of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. 2. Any additional funding secured by WSDOT beyond the amount identified in Section 4, Reimbursement and Payment will be allocated to the Contractor for the period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 in accordance with the methodology described in Sections 1 and 2 of Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. If an increase in funding by the funding source augments the Contractor's allocation of funding under this Agreement, the Contractor and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this Agreement providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or the project amount in order to reflect any such increase in funding. 3. If a reduction of funding by the funding source reduces the Contractor's allocation of funding under this Agreement, the Contractor and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this Agreement providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or.the project amount in order to reflect any such reduction of funding. Section 9 Recapture Provision In the event that the Contractor fails to expend state funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this Agreement, WSDOT reserves the right to recapture state funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed three (3) years following termination of the Agreement. Repayment by the Contractor of state funds under this recapture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand. Page 3 GCA3657 Section 10 Disputes Any disputes between WSDOT and the Contractor with regard to this Agreement that are not disposed of by the project administrators assigned to supervise this Agreement shall be referred for determination to the Secretary of WSDOT, or his/her designee, as a condition precedent to the commencement of any legal action, except as necessary to avoid the preclusive effects of any applicable contractual deadlines or statutes of limitation. Section 11 Termination WSDOT, at its sole discretion, may suspend or terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, for the following reasons: 1. The Contractor materially breaches, or fails to perform any of the requirements of, this Agreement, and after fourteen (14) days written notice, has failed to cure the condition(s) causing that breach; The Contractor materially breaches and fails to remedy after fourteen (14) days written notice. Conditions of breach may include, but not be limited to: • Any action of the Contractor, which under the procedures of this Agreement would have required the approval of WSDOT, taken without such WSDOT approval; • Failure to perform in the manner called for in this Agreement; and • Failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement. 2. The Contractor is prevented from proceeding with the Project by reason of a temporary preliminary, special, or permanent restraining order or injunction of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order or injunction is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the Contractor; 3. The requisite state funding is reduced or becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise; 4. WSDOT determines that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds; 5. WSDOT, at its sole discretion, determines to accept a request made in writing by the Contractor to terminate the Agreement in whole or in part; or 6. WSDOT determines that suspension or termination is in the best interests of the state. If this Agreement is terminated under subsections 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6 of this Section, then the Contractor may be reimbursed only for actual and eligible direct expenses under this Agreement incurred prior to the date of termination, and then only to the extent of appropriated funds. If this Agreement is terminated under subsection 1 of this Section, then WSDOT shall not be obligated to provide any additional reimbursement past the effective date of that termination and WSDOT shall also retain all rights to seek recapture or damages from the Contractor. If an appropriate judicial authority determines that the Agreement was improperly terminated under subsection 1 of this Section, then the termination shall be deemed a termination under subsection 6 of this Section with all attendant rights and limitations. Page 4 GCA3657 Section 12 Forbearance by WSDOT Not a Waiver Any forbearance by WSDOT in exercising any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise afforded by applicable law, shall not be a waiver, or preclude the exercise, of any such right or remedy. Section 13 Waiver In no event shall any WSDOT payment of grant funds to the Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by WSDOT of any Contractor breach, or default, and shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to WSDOT with respect to any breach or default. Section 14 Independent Contractor The Contractor shall be deemed an independent Contractor for all purposes, and the employees of the Contractor or any of its subcontractors and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be employees of WSDOT. Section 15 WSDOT Advice The Contractor bears complete responsibility for the administration and success of the Project as it is defined by this Agreement and any amendments thereto. Although the Contractor is allowed to seek the advice of WSDOT on problems that may arise, the offering of WSDOT advice shall not shift the responsibility of the Contractor for the correct administration and success of the Project, and WSDOT shall not be held liable for offering advice to the Contractor. Section 16 Limitation of Liability and Indemnification No liability shall be attached to WSDOT or the Contractor by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. This Agreement is not intended to benefit any third party. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers harmless from, and shall process and defend at its own expense, any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature (hereafter "claims") brought against WSDOT arising out of or incident to the execution, performance or failure to perform of or under this Agreement; provided, however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Contractor, its agents, employees, and/or officers and (b) WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its agents, employees, and/or officers; and provided further that nothing herein shall require the Contractor to hold harmless or defend WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers. Page 5 GCA3657 Section 17 Hold Harmless It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents or employees, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from such liability. Each contract for service or activities utilizing funds provided in whole or part by this Agreement shall include a provision that WSDOT and the State of Washington are not liable for damage or claims for damages arising from any city, town, designee or subcontractor's performance or activities under the terms of those contracts. Section 18 Governing Law, Venue, and Process This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the validity and performance thereof shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the State of Washington situated in Thurston County. The Contractor hereby accepts service of process by registered mail consistent with RCW 4.28.080(1). Each party shall bear its own legal costs and expenses, including attorney fees, in any such litigation. The parties may bilaterally elect to submit their dispute to mediation or arbitration on such terms as are agreed upon by the parties. Section 19 Compliance with Laws and Regulations The Contractor agrees to abide by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those concerning employment, equal opportunity employment, nondiscrimination assurances, project record keeping necessary to evidence agreement compliance, and retention of all such records. The Contractor will adhere to all of the nondiscrimination provisions in Chapter 49.60 RCW. The Contractor will also comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local government services and telecommunication. Section 20 Section Headings All section headings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. Section 21 Severability If any covenant or provision of this Agreement shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the validity or obligation of performance of any other covenant or provision, or part thereof, that in itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of Page 6 GCA3657 i applicable law and the intent of this Agreement. No controversy concerning any covenant or provision shall delay the performance of any other covenant or provision except as herein allowed. Section 22 Execution and Acceptance This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Contractor does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements and their supporting materials contained and/or mentioned herein, and does hereby accept State funds and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Section 23 Execution This Agreement is executed by the Director of the Public Transportation and Rail Division, State of Washington, Department of Transportation or the Director's designee, not as an individual incurring personal obligation and liability, but solely by, for, and on behalf of the State of Washington, Department of Transportation, in his/her capacity as Director of the Public Transportation and Rail Division. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Judith Giniger, Director Public Transportation and Rail Division Date: Approved as to form by: Jeanne A. Cushman Assistant Attorney General Counsel to WSDOT Date: July 30, 2003 By: Print Name: Title: Who certifies proper authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the Contractor Date: Page 7 GCA3657 Exhibit I Funding Allocation Methodology Funding allocated by WSDOT for local implementation of CTR activities is based on the following formula: 1. Each county is provided $1,200 per affected worksite as a base allocation to ensure sufficient funding to meet jurisdiction obligations pursuant to RCW.70.94.521-551. The number of affected worksites in each county shall be based on information contained in WSDOT database as of May 1 of each year. 2. The remaining funding will be allocated based on the number of commute trips reduced per day in each county between each worksite's base year survey and its most recent survey, provided that every county receives at least $80,000 per year. For the period July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004, the most recent survey period will be 2001. For the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, the most recent survey period will be 2003. July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004 Allocation County Number of Sites Trips Reduced/ Day Worksite Base Allocation Performance Allocation Additional to Achieve $80,00 Floor Total Allocation Benton $50,000 Clark 47 654 $56,400 $20,266 $3,334 $80,000 King 552 11,575 $662,400 $280,270 $942,670 Kitsap 32 0 $38,400 $0 $41,600 $80,000.00 Pierce 83 4,278 $99,600 $103,585 $203,185 Snohomish 84 1,050 $100,800 $25,424 $126,224 Spokane 99 2,255 $118,800 $54,601 $173,401 Thurston 65 579 $78,000 $14,020 $92,020 Whatcom 23 329 $27,600 $10,1951 $42,205F $80,000 Yakima 1 20 1 304 1 $24,000 $9,4201 $46,5801 $80,000 TOTAL 1 1,005 1 21,024 1$1,206,000 $517,7811 $133,7191 $1,907,500.00 Any distribution of funds to jurisdictions within a county shall be done on the basis of the number of affected worksites in each jurisdiction. For example, if there are two jurisdictions in a county, each with fifty percent of the total number of affected worksites in the county, any division of funds within the county should provide each of the two jurisdictions with fifty percent of the total county funding allocation. Page 8 GCA3657 i EXHIBIT II SCOPE OF WORK Implementation of Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plans and Program CONTRACTOR TASKS 1. General Administration The Contractor will administer a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) ordinance and implement a CTR program for major employers as required by RCW 70.94.521 et. seq. 2. Funding Distribution and Reporting The Contractor may distribute funds to affected jurisdictions, or their designees, within the county implementing CTR plans and ordinances as required by RCW 70.94.544 by entering into agreement as appropriate with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or other organizations. The Contractor shall submit to WSDOT a list of dollar amounts to be disbursed by the Contractor to local jurisdiction(s) local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or independent contractors, or a fund dispersion methodology within thirty (30) days of approval of any agreements between the Contractor and other parties. 3. Implementation Plans The Contractor, the affected jurisdictions, or its designee, shall implement all of the provisions listed below. The Contractor shall include all of these provisions in interlocal agreements with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or other organizations, as necessary, to coordinate the development, implementation, and administration of CTR plans and ordinances. 3.1 Appeals, Exemptions, and Modifications Maintain an appeals process. This process must be consistent with RCW 70.94.534(6) and procedures contained in the Commute Trip Reduction Task Force Guidelines. The Contractor, or their designees, will submit requests for exemptions or modifications, including requests for goal modifications, to WSDOT for review and comment within five (5) days of receiving such requests, and shall allow WSDOT five (5) working days to provide comments prior to approving or denying the request. 3.2 Survey Processing Notify WSDOT prior to sending any surveys to the University of Washington, Office of Educational Assessment for processing. The notification must include the name of the worksite, employer identification code, and type of survey for each survey being submitted for processing. The notification shall be submitted as an electronic spreadsheet via electronic mail. The Contractor agrees to wait for confirmation from WSDOT prior to sending or delivering the surveys for processing. Page 9 GCA3657 3.3 Database Updates Provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected worksites and jurisdiction contacts on a quarterly basis. These updates will be submitted electronically in a format specified by WSDOT. 3.4 Employer Annual Reports Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT one electronic or hard copy of any approved employer annual report. 3.5 Employer Exemptions and Goal Modifications Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT the name and employer identification code for any worksite that has been granted an exemption or goal modification. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information on the type of goal modification granted. 3.6 Progress Report and Invoice Submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports, as detailed in Exhibit III, along with any invoice or request for reimbursement. WSDOT TASKS 1. General Technical Assistance WSDOT will . provide support to the Contractor, or their designees, in developing and implementing CTR plans and programs, including providing training, informational materials, and assistance in CTR evaluation. WSDOT will also assist with overall -CTR marketing and promotion on a statewide basis. 2. Exemptions and Modifications WSDOT will review and comment on employer requests for waivers and modifications, including requests for goal modifications, within five (5) working days. Failure to review and comment on such requests within five (5) working days shall be considered a forfeiture of the right to comment on the request. 3. Database Management WSDOT will maintain a current database of all affected worksites in Washington State. WSDOT will input new and/or updated worksite information within fifteen (15) working days of receipt from local jurisdictions. WSDOT will employ an internal verification process to ensure all new and/or updated information is input in a timely and accurate manner. Information from the WSDOT database will be used to determine funding allocation consistent with the methodology contained in Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. 4. Training WSDOT will develop and maintain employer and jurisdictions training materials to support local implementation of the CTR program. Page 10 GCA3657 5. Public Awareness WSDOT will develop and implement statewide public awareness and recognition programs to support local implementation of the CTR program in affected jurisdictions. 6. Annual Reporting Assistance WSDOT will distribute in sufficient quantities the State "Program Description and Employer Annual Report" form to the Contractor, affected jurisdiction, or its designee, as requested. WSDOT will also maintain an internet-based annual report system, and will provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system. 7. Survey Assistance WSDOT will: 7.1 Provide the Contractor, or their designees, with summary survey information as requested. 7.2 Distribute the Employee Questionnaires in sufficient numbers to the Contractor, or its designees, as requested. 7.3 Maintain an internet-based survey tool, and provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system. 7.4 Provide survey processing at no cost to the Contractor, or their designees, and affected employers, during the base year and all subsequent surveys required by the Contractor. 7.5 Provide technical assistance to the Contractor, or their designees, and employers, on surveying, as requested. 7.6 Work with the Contractor, or their designees, to calculate goal measurement information and track measurement survey history for all CTR affected worksites. 7.7 Return the processed Employee Questionnaires and survey reports to the Contractor, or their designees, within thirty (30) days of the date the forms are delivered for processing. 7.8 Maintain and periodically update the "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys". WSDOT will review survey guide/instructional materials developed by the Contractor or its designees for consistency with the state -developed "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys". 7.9 Review all electronically submitted survey notifications and respond to the Contractor within five (5) working days. Page 11 GCA3657 Exhibit III Progress Report Format • Name of the organization submitting report: • Submitted on behalf of following jurisdiction(s): • Contact name: • Contact phone and fax number: • Contact e-mail: 1. CTR Activities A brief summary of activities undertaken during the period for which reimbursement is requested. 2. State CTR Funds Disbursed Jurisdiction Disbursed Since Last Report Total Disbursed Fiscal Year to Date Jurisdiction A $ $ Jurisdiction B $ $ (etc.) Total Disbursement $ $ Page 12 GCA3657 3. Expenditures This Period List actual total expenditures on the last line of the following table. Estimate expenditures by category as indicated. Local Fiscal Year Other Fiscal Year Funds to Date Funds to Date State CTR Fiscal Year Spent on Local Spent on Other Funds To Date CTR Funds CTR Funds Spent State CTR Activities Spent on Activities Spent on Since Last Funds Since Last CTR Since Last CTR Categories Report Sent Report Activities Report Activities Required Activities, $ $ $ $ $ $ including: 1. Notification of New Worksites 2. Administering CTR Surveys 3. Employer Annual Report Review 4. Exemptions and Modifications 5. Record Maintenance 6. Enforcement Employer Service Activities Employer Training $ $ $ $ $ $. Incentives $ $ $ $ $ $ Promotion and $ $ $ $ $ $ Marketing Guaranteed Ride $ $ $ $ $ $ Home Other (Specify) $ $ $ $ $ $ Totals $ $ $ $ $ $ 4. Jurisdiction(s) Contact Names, Address, and Phone Numbers Jurisdiction A John Who City of X PO Box 1234 X, WA 98000 Phone (206) 999-9999 5. List of contact information for affected worksites in the Jurisdiction. The information will be submitted in the electronic format approved by WSDOT. 6. Employer Annual Reports Approved During This Period Provide the name and worksite identification number for all employer annual reports approved during this period. Attach a hard copy or electronic (disc) copy of any employer annual reports approved by the jurisdiction during the quarter. If the jurisdiction approved employer annual reports submitted via WSDOT's web -based reporting system, indicate the name and worksite identification number for each worksite report approved. Page 13 GCA3657 ♦ 0 7. Employer Exemptions and Goal Modifications Granted During This Period Provide the name and worksite identification number for any worksite that has been granted an exemption or goal modification during this period. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information on the type of goal modification granted. Page 14 GCA3657 e CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7nnd - 9nnQ CIX-YEAR Tip Transportation Demand Management Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12M RANK: 26 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: Renton's TDM program implements the State's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Act by encouraging a reduction in the use of single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Incentives are offered to employees (at businesses with 106 or more employees) arriving to work between 6 and 9 AM. The City has two CTR programs: 1. The Citywide and 2. the City Hall CTR program (see note below). The TIP funds the Citywide CTR Program and offers technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the Act. JUSTIFICATION: The City is required by 1991 State Legislation to develop and implement a CTR program. This law applies to areas of the State with continuing air quality problems. TDM is an important element in achieving desired transportation, environmental, and land use goals. N gk: Renton City Hall is an affected CTR site and must implement its own CTR program for City employees; it is funded outside the TIP program. Project Totals Programme Pre-2004 STATUS: It is expected that technical assistance to employers for the Citywide program will continue at current levels in 2004 provided State funds in support of this program continue to be provided. CHANGES: Renton has received a State grant for $42,878 (July 2002 - June 2003) to help fund the Citywide CTR program. Additional State grant funds may be available in 2004 and beyond, but actual amounts and details of this funding is currently unknown. une nune six -Year Program ITEM Programm Spent In 2002 2003 Total 2004 2005 2006 1 2007 2008 2009 EXPENSES: eve o men 0 eon nmininc n u es mionstrucbonContract P ee ucbon n mm Tech. Assist Contraz. 508,093 58,693 64,200 385,200 ,200 6 ,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 ,200 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1/2 Cent Gas I ax usiness ucense Fee Vehicle License Fee Grants In -Hand Mitigation In - and s Formed Other In -Hand allot) , Grants Proposed on ro se roosero ose TOTAL SOURM 508,0931 8,693 64,2001 385,200 64,200 ,200 54,2001 64,2001 64,200 64,200 TOM 07AWM 9:06 AM 5 - 26 FINAL CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Staff Contact...... Nathan A. Jones, x-7217 Subject: Citywide Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program Implementation Agreement with King County Exhibits: Issue Paper Resolution Agreement Recommended Action: Council Concur Al #: o For Agenda of: December 8, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ X Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $39,332 Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated... $40,986 State funding Total Project Budget $64,200 City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: This agreement authorizes King County Department of Transportation staff to conduct work in support of activities the City of Renton is required to do under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law. This is an ongoing program and the contract is renewed every year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Transportation Division staff recommend the Council approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of $39,332. H:Trans/Admin/Agenda Bill 2003/KC CTR Agenda Bill CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerma�, dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, extension 7217 SUBJECT: 2003-2004 King County Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Contract ISSUE: Each year since the State CTR Law was passed in 1991, the City of Renton enters into an agreement with the King County Department of Transportation to allow Metro Transit Division staff to perform the State -mandated duties specified by the Washington State CTR Law on behalf of the City of Renton. RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Systems Division staff recommends the Council approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of $39,332. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton implements a program in accordance with the State CTR Law to monitor Renton employers with CTR-affected worksites for progress and compliance. This law was enacted as part of the Washington State Clean Air Act to provide measures that would improve air quality and manage congestion by encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicle (SOV) commute travel through the use of incentives to employees at businesses with 100 or more employees arriving to work between 6 and 9AM. Renton contracts each year with King County Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division to provide staff who offer technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the CTR Law. Funding provided by the State covers the expenses of the King County contract and City staff administrative labor. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY ENTITLED "COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION ACT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT." WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Commute Trip Reduction Act, is required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to the City; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation, by law, distributes these funds to the counties, which in turn distributes the funds to the cities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the county will distribute commute trip reduction funds to the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has previously entered into similar contracts for commute trip reduction funds; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, . WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Act Implementation Agreement" and later similar contracts that have the same general purpose, terms and funding. 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1011:9/22/03:ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2003. 9 2 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION ACT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT An Agreement between King County, through its Department of Transportation, (hereinafter called "King County") and the City of Renton ("City"), hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Parties," for the purpose of implementing the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction Act ("CTR Act") of 1991. WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Commute Trip Reduction Act (Chapter 202, Laws of 1991, codified as RCW 70.94.521-551) to require local governments in those counties experiencing the greatest automobile -related air pollution and traffic congestion to develop and implement plans to reduce vehicle miles traveled per employee and single occupant vehicle commute trips; and - WHEREAS, the City has within its boundaries one or more''major employers" and is required by RCW 70.94.527 to develop and implement a commute trip reduction plan; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 70.94.527 (6); and WHEREAS, the King County Code 28.94.110 authorizes the execution and administration of Agreements with state and local agencies for assistance in implementing the Commute Trip Reduction Act; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction commute trip reduction plans are required to be coordinated and consistent with plans of adjacent jurisdictions and applicable regional plans; and WHEREAS, the City and King County desire to implement the Commute Trip Reduction Act consistent with the guidelines established by the state Commute Trip Reduction Task Force and with King County and other cities within the county; and WHEREAS, the City can achieve cost efficiencies and administrative consistency by contracting with King County for CTR implementation; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, it is hereby agreed: SECTION 1.0 PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to assign certain tasks to be undertaken by King County on behalf of the City to implement the CTR Act. 2003-2004 CTR Act Implementation Agreement I Page 2 SECTION 2.0 DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this Agreement: "Administrative Representative" means the primary administrative contact for issues related to this Agreement as designated in Section 3.5 of the Agreement. "Affected Employer" means an employer required by RCW 70.94.521 and the City's CTR Plan to implement a CTR program (see also "Major Employer"). "Commute Trip Reduction Plan (CTR Plan)" means a plan adopted by the City designed to reduce the proportion of single occupant vehicle commute trips and vehicle miles traveled per employee, as described in RCW 70.94.527. "Commute Trip Reduction Program (CTR Program)" means a program designed by an affected employer to reduce the proportion of single occupant vehicle -commute trips and the commute trip vehicle miles traveled by employees at a worksite, as described in RCW 70.94.531. "CTR Funds" means state funds authorized by RCW 70.94.544 and Section 301 of the Natural Resources biennial budget to help counties and cities implement commute trip reduction plans. "Major Employer" means a private or public employer that employs one hundred or more full- time employees at a single worksite who are scheduled to begin their regular workday between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekdays for at least twelve continuous months during the year, as provided in RCW 70.94.521 (herein also known as an "affected employer"). "State" is the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) unless otherwise noted. SECTION 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 Scope of Work: The scope of work to be completed by King County and the City in accordance with this Agreement is described in "Exhibit A: Scope of Work", which by reference is made a part of this Agreement. Funds provided by the City to King County under this Agreement shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the provisions of the scope of work as provided in Exhibit A. 3.2 Regional Cooperation: Some tasks in the Scope of Work are subarea or county -wide and assume that the City will participate with other contracting cities and try to the extent possible to develop policies and products consistent throughout the county to take advantage of economies of scale and cost efficiencies. 3.3 Schedule: The schedule for tasks is specified in Exhibit A: Scope of Work. A quarterly review of progress to date and anticipated activities will be held with jurisdiction 2003-2004 CTR Act'Implementation Agreement Page 3 representatives. On -going review of issues and materials will be conducted with the jurisdiction representatives. 3.4 Project Organization: The contract -funded position will conduct contractual activities for the jurisdiction. The position will work in a single division which includes other contract staff and report to the CTR Services Supervisor. 3.5 Administrative Representatives: King County and the City shall each designate an administrative representative for matters pertaining to this Agreement. King County shall be represented by the Manager of Sales and Customer Service or his designee. The City shall be represented by the Director, Transportation Systems Division or his/her designee. 3.6 State Requirements: At the request of the City, King County shall provide information to the State for monitoring or evaluation activities as outlined in the Interlocal Agreement. SECTION 4.0 DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS 4.1 Budget: The budget for work to be performed through June 30, 2003 is specified in Exhibit B. 4.2 Equipment: Equipment to be purchased under this Agreement shall be used exclusively for the purpose of CTR administration for the City and other jurisdictions in King County. King County shall own all such equipment and maintain it at no additional cost to the City. 4.3 Payment Process: King County shall submit the City's invoice and a quarterly progress report to the City per the following schedule. The City shall make payment to King County within 45 days of receipt of the invoice. Payment Fixed Invoice Submitted Payment No Earlier Than IA payment $9,653.00 September 30, 2003 2°d payment $9,653.00 December 31, 2003 3`d payment $9,653.00 March 31, 2004 4th payment $9,653.00 June 30, 2004 Total $38,612.00 4.4 Payment Amounts: Each payment shall consist of the fixed amount specified above in Section 4.3, plus reimbursement of workshop expenses estimated to $720.00. The City shall pay a percentage share of workshop expenses based on the percentage of the total registrants for the workshop representing worksites in the City. 2003-2004 CTR Act Implementation Agreement Page 4 The workshop expenses to be shared by the City shall consist of a fixed labor element plus actual nonlabor expenditures. The fixed labor element shall be as follows: - ETC Orientation $ 480.00 fixed labor charge per workshop - Program Implementation $ 480.00 fixed labor charge per workshop - Survey Briefing $ 163.00 fixed labor charge per workshop - Additional Workshops $ 48.00 fixed labor charge per hour for King County trainers SECTION 5.0 AUDITING OF RECORDS, DOCUMENTS;AND REPORTS The State Auditor and any of its representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as the state Auditor may deem necessary, all the records of the City and King County with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement. Each Party to the Agreement shall have similar access and rights with respect to the records of the other Party. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. Such rights last for three (3) years from the date final payment is made hereunder. SECTION 6.0 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. King County agrees to abide by all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations prohibiting employment discrimination. SECTION 7.0 WAIVER OF DEFAULT Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless stated to be such in writing, signed by an authorized representatives of the County, and attached to the original Agreement. SECTION 8.0 SEVERABILITY Should any clause, phrase, sentence or paragraph of this Agreement be declared invalid or void, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect if such remainder 2003-2004 CTR Act Implementation Agreement Page 5 continues to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this Agreement. SECTION 9.0 INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMILESS It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the Parties hereto and gives no right to any other Party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. Each Party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, and those of its officers, agents or employees, while performing work pursuant to this Agreement, to the fullest extent required by law, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold the other Parties harmless from any such liability. In the case of negligence of multiple Parties, any damages allowed shall be assessed in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each Party, and each Party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other Parties in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other Parties. The City acknowledges it is solely responsible for its compliance with the CTR Act, and for the adoption, implementation, and enforcement of any ordinances, plans, and programs related to the CTR Act. The City.shall indemnify and hold King County harmless from, and shall process and defend, at its own expense, any and all claims, demands, suits at law of equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages, or costs arising out of, in connection with, or incidental to any act or omission of the City or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors or agents in adopting or enforcing any ordinances, plans and programs related to the CTR Act. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the State of Washington is not liable for damage or claims from damages arising from any act or omission of King County or the City under this Agreement. SECTION 10.0 AGREEMENT PERIOD This Agreement is effective from July 1, 2063. The expiration date for purposes of performing substantive work as described in Exhibit A (Scope of Work) and for incurring costs is June 30, 2004, and for final accounting purposes is July 31, 2004, unless the Parties agree to an extension. Termination of this Agreement does not relieve any of the Parties from any obligations incurred through the date of termination as a result of this Agreement. SECTION 11.0 AGREEMENT MODIFICATIONS This Agreement may be amended, altered, clarified or extended only by written Agreement of the designated administrative representative of the City and King County. 2003-2004 CTR Act Implementation Agreement SECTION 12.0 TERMINATION Page 6 12.1 Either Party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part, upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of the termination to the other Party. If this Agreement is so terminated prior to fulfillment of the terms stated herein, King County shall be reimbursed for all actual direct and related indirect expenses and noncancellable obligations incurred to date of termination. 12.2 If at any time during the Agreement period the State acts to terminate, reduce, modify, or withhold CTR Grant Funds allotted to the City pursuant to RCW 79.94.544 then either Party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the other Party. Dated this day of 2003. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day first above mentioned. Approved as to form: City Attorney By General Manager, Metro Transit CITY OF RENTON By Mayor City of Renton — Exhibit A Commute Trip Reduction Services Contract Scope of Work Period: July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004 Work Activities — 24 current sites A. Notification of new sites 1. Identify contact for potential sites 2. Send notification inquiry 3. Confirm status 4. Secure state code 5. Create timeline and legal file B. Survey 1. Alert employer to survey timeline 2. Track survey completion and processing 3. Send survey results to employer C. Program review 1. Remind employers of submittal deadlines 2. Monitor program report receipt 3. Review revised programs for sites that did not make progress and evaluate the potential for progress toward SOV reduction 4. Review program reports for completeness for new sites and for sites that made progress toward goal 5. Recommend action to jurisdiction 6. Generate approval letter for City signature D. Exemptions & Modifications 1. Inform new sites about process and criteria 2. Receive requests and copy to city 3. Copy request to state for comment 4. Review and analyze request and provide comments to City 5. Contact employer as needed, generate and send response per city E. Records maintenance 1. Maintain database and master file records on all affected sites 2. On a quarterly basis, provide WSDOT with hard copy of each employer program report approved within the quarter 3. Provide WSDOT with an electronic copy of the CTR database of the City's CTR-affected employers, quarterly or as required by WSDOT 4. Provide quarterly report information for jurisdiction to conduct state funds billing Schedule As needed First quarter and as necessary Ordinance schedule by Site As needed On -going Exhibit A F. Program Development As needed New Sites 1: Provide written information on basic requirements of the CTR Ordinance, CTR Zones, and an explanation of how the plan is intended to achieve its goals 2. Provide materials that explain a range of measures and activities that may help the employer achieve the CTR goals of the local ordinance 3. Assist with voluntary baseline survey. Analyze survey data and make programs recommendations. G. New ETC Consultation/Briefing As needed 1. Provide written information on basic requirements of the CTR Ordinance, CTR Zones, and an explanation of how the plan is intended to achieve its goals 2. Provide materials that explain a range of measures and activities that may help the employer achieve the CTR goals of the local ordinance-: H. Program Implementation Assistance As needed Provide assistance in the following categories: 1. Identify resources and implementation requirements 2. Coordinate/attend network group meetings 3. Communicate with ETCs about transportation issues, including Sound Transit, Metro Transit, Special events and items of interest (e.g.: construction and road closures, Air Quality alerts, WSRO bulletins) 4. Provide promotion/incentive support and coordination (e.g.: planning, develop materials, implement and evaluate, includes Rideshare campaign and Relax campaign) I. Training Quarterly Provide county -wide basic training to new ETCs 1. Basic Training part 1: ETC orientation 2. .Basic Training part 2: Program Implementation and Promotion 3. Survey briefing CITY OF RENTON Period: July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004 FUNDING State CTR Funds (estimated) $1,200 per site for Required Activities $507.74 per site for Employer Services TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE NUMBER OF SITES Exhibit B $ 28,800.00 $ 12,185.76 $ 40,985.76 24 CTR SERVICES CONTRACT Required Activities 1. New Site Notification / Site status change $ 144 2. Data Management & Survey Processes $ 5,204 3. Program Review & Site Analysis $ 13,248 4. Exemptions, Modifications and Compliance Issues $ 1,152 5. Records Maintenance $ 3,456 Total Required Activities $ 23,204 Employer Service 1. Employer Training $ 720 2. Incentives $ 1,200 3. Promotions & Marketing $ 2,304 4. Program Development $ 1,536 5. Program Implementation $ 10,368 Total Employer Service $ 16,128 CONTRACT TOTAL $ 399332 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7nnd _ 7nno civ.VCAO rin Transportation Demand Management Program Functional classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12135 RANK: 26 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: - Renton 's TDM program implements the State's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Act by encouraging a It is expected that technical assistance to employers for the Citywide program will reduction in the use of single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Incentives are offered to employees (at continue at current levels in 2004 provided State funds in support of this program businesses with 106 or more employees) arriving to work between 6 and 9 AM. The City has two CTR continue to be provided. programs: 1. The Citywide and 2. the City Hall CTR program (see note below). The TIP funds the Citywide CTR Program and offers technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the Act. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The City is required by 1991 State Legislation to develop and implement a CTR program. This law. Renton has received a State grant for $42,878 (July 2002 - June 2003) to help fund the applies to areas of the State with continuing air quality problems. TDM is an important element in Citywide CTR program. Additional State grant funds may be available in 2004 and achieving desired transportation, environmental, and land use goals. beyond, but actual amounts and details of this funding is currently unknown. Note: Renton. City Hall is an affected CTR site and must implement its own CTR program for City employees; it is funded outside the TIP program. Project Totals Programme Pre-2004 une 0803 nune Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2002 2003 Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Project Development 4 1 0 3, 0 recon ng min -O- inc u es mm onstruction Contract Fee Construction n min UtTi—er ec . Assist. ontract SOURCE OF FUNDS—. 508,093 8,693 64,200 385,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 641200 64,200 64,200 1/2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 344,400 491200 49,200 49,200 49,200 49,200 Vehicle License Fee Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand s Formed Other In -Hand allot) ,0 0 15,000 15,000,000 Grants Proposed itigation Propose .D. s ro ose 0 er Proposed n etermine TOTAL SOLIKULtil 508,0931 58,693 '64,2001 385,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,2001 64,200 64,200 TDM 5 - 26 FINAL r v /a-8-4003 Nay. , 2003 Renton City Council Renton, Wa. 9805� 17Y Ii r- Renton monthly utility statement includes Waste Water and Surface Water, hard to understa when heavy storm water runoff requires yearly ongoing sump pump usage at my home with water a .foot high under the house at times reaching the insulation wrap on the underhouse heating ducts. Since the heavy rain two weeks ago my sump pump burned out. I borrowed a pump from a neice that a neighbor kindly installed in the sump hole. As water pumping still necessary I have to keep a careful check on the pump as it is not automatic. Since 1958 five sump pumps have been purchased with a sixth needed soon. The home was built forty five years ago on a lot on the west side of 21 hundred block of Smithers Avenue South. At that time the east side of roadway was lower than the west side sloping off to the east in a duck pood thru vacant land. We bad been .in three floods in the Valley when we purchased the home site boping to get away from water problems. No water existed until two homes were built in the field. on east side of roadway requiring tons of fill dirt the equivalent of a full basement. Drainage problems started shortly after also, septic tank overflow water from across the street when water table high. Due to the drainage the County dug a shallow ditch and check the drainage underroad ditch on the 22nd hundred block that ran across a field towards Talbot Road. The problem was not solved. Renton annexed the area requiring sewage systems to be installedzwhich helped the septic overflow from across the roadway but not the storm water runoff: Sometime later they had workmen dig the ditch much deeper which put our sump pump into storage as i.t was not needed. Some time bad passesd when a land owner across the roadway bad land. subdivied. At that time we asked Renton not to allow fill dirt as the land was .as low as our lot. The owner promised us no fill would be used. Regardless up to a foot of fill was brought in. Shortly after a Renton water main broke when construction was started an new home site. When it was discovered we had water up to the heating ducts bringing wrapping down in the water. It put my busband in the Hospital due to the mess. For some reason Renton decided to cover the ditch by putting in a round pipe with cover. At that time I asked to have ditch remain open as it had been our only relief. I asked then if a French drain could be installed instead of a round pipe relating the drainage problem. They said not necessary. Strom water problem was back. Renton installed a berm on the west side of roadway which helped a little on street water. At times the street water came over_ the berm into the car port. Water rolls over the covered pipe on eastside of roadway, under the pipe and very little water runs thru it of one checks the northend of pipe where it connects with the deep open ditch. I've heard street work may be considered next spring on the roadway on the 27st and 22nd block of Smithers Ave. So. I would appreciate a check into the ongoing Storm water drainage problem first in hopes of finding a solution. The home next door to the South is also having pumping problems. If you will note water is now standing on the corner lot of 23rd and Smithers that may require fill dirt when new homes constructed which could cause more high water table to the low houses on the street. Thank you for your kind attention to my request. Sincyxnly, VirM. Hill l 2115 W thers Ave. So. Renton, Wa. 98055 425-255-4750 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT Hate /a- 9 2003 December 8, 2003 ADOPTION OF THE 2004 BUDGET, MAKING AMENDMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE COUNCIL, RECOMMENDING FEE INCREASES FOR VARIOUS PARKS AND RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS. November 1, 2003 The Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the Ordinance adopting the 2004 Budget in the amount of $146,500,500. This recommendation decreases the Mayor's proposed budget by $2.2 million for the appropriation of monies received from King County as mitigationfor the changes at the Wastewater Treatment facility located in Renton. The Council will discuss the use of these monies at their January Council Retreat, and the final appropriation of these monies will be made in a future ordinance. The Budget also appropriates a $1.5 millio"Aransfer from`T and 301 — Parking Garage Construction Fund to Fund 317 — Transportation Capital Improvements Tund for the`tpurpose of paying for street and other transportation planning efforts in Phase`I of thfie Boelig„Redevelopment area. The $1.5 million must then also be legally appropriated in Fund 317>�opermrt actualexpenditures._ .r- The Committee also recommends the,$95,000 currently appropriated im"Fund 316 as Narco Park Planning now be appropriated and reserved as.Parks Contmgei cy Ileserve:'`x The Committee further recommends the Budget create whew Fund entitled .the Insurance Healthcare Fund.. This Fund will account for all revenues, paid premiums and expenditures the City has for health care costs. The Committee also recommends -the ordinance that increases the 20'04 Athletic Field Light fees between $2.00. and $3.00 per hour depending upon the,_user. The Committee concurs that Gene Coulon Park Picnic Shelter:,and Boat Launch fees also be increased as presented by the Department. The Committee also adopts the recommendation that damage and after hours fees be increased at the Renton Community Center. . Finally, the Committee recommends the fees for the new Henry Moses Aquatic Center be adopted as presented. These fees will have a price differential for resident and non-resident users. Further, Staff will explore admitting non -swimming parents into the facility free of charge to supervise their children during non -peak hours. 4�4 /dW4� G� : Kathy K lker-Wheeler, Council President cc: Victoria Runkle, Finance & IS Administrator Elaine Gregory, Fiscal Services Director Sylvia Doerschel, Finance Analyst Supervisor H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\1_CommitteReports\2004 Budget Adoption.doc f P 17R IVED BY .I C �-Vu COUNCiL UTILITIES COMMITTEE Data COMMITTEE REPORT December 8, 2003 Water and Sanitary Sewer Boundary Agreement Between Renton and Skyway Water and Sewer District (Referred December 1, 2003) The. Utilities Committee recommends concurrence with the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommendation to approve the interlocal agreement with Skyway Water and Sewer District identifying the boundaries where ,aea h$°agency is responsible to :provide water and sanitary sewer service: �d -414 The Utilities Committee further 6commendCCouncil ;authorize*�.the. Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocaI agreement,, 7�9 rl"., Iq qR,y° t a• y Rdidy Cormanhair �` �5 J3 r i 2 r - Y Terri Brier , Vice Chair r _ A' Dan Clawson, Member o cc: Lys Hornsby CAVVINDOWS\TEWSkyway Interlocal Utilities Con mitte Report.doc\MBtp TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 8, 2003 APPLMOIVL�;01 BY CGTY COUNCIL. Date �a- 8 aoo3 Three-hour Parking Permits for Certain Businesses in the CBD (September 9, 2003) Available parking is limited in the City's downtown core. Consequently, the City established time restrictions on parking in this area. These parking restrictions range from 1- to 2-hours, with the majority of parking being 2-hours—These time restrictions provide good turn around of the limited parking spaces while aI ,owM sufficient turl "for most customers to conduct their business. Y `' The City recently constructed a parking garage in the ,Central E accommodate those that needadditional time ;in,therycore area' for lon Allowing selected businesses the privilege of 3°-h6ur 15arking wout requests from other businesses � in the core area° asking for the same of 3-hour parking could have the potential of larmii g many of the depend on the parking turnover to -assure the vitality of theirFbusnes K., 4 The Transportation Committee` recommends, Council rnaiutain restrictions in the Central Business: District rt ; 4on Persson, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice -Chi' Terri Brier , Member cc: Karl Hamilton Connie Brundage District (CBD) to parking. .lake it difficult to deny ivilege. A proliferation businesses that the established parking H:Trans/Admin/ referrals/ 2003/Three-hour parking BY TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION CONIlVIITTEE COMAUTTEE REPORT Date /a- g aQ03 December 9, 2003 Improve Safety and Capacity on the SR 1.69 Corridor (Referred November 17, 2003 The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt a resolution encouraging funding of the SR 169 Corridor Study and reclassifying the full length of SR 169 to be part of King County's regional arterial network. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption.-40 i_ if do„ Don Persson; Chkir t Toni Nelson, Vice-C 1 ' Te i riere, Member cc: Nick Afzali Connie Brundage Keith Woolley H:\division.shranspo.tat/admin/commrepo/2003/SR 169 Condor Resolution ATIPPOVED BY QTV COUNCIL Date /0?- L aoo'?. FINANCE COMMITTEE COMNHTTEE REPORT December 8, 2003 GOLF COURSE FEES Hicks Correspondence (Referred October 27, 2003) The Finance Committee recommends concurrence. in the staff recommendation that the summer, winter and off-peak fee structures currently in place at Maplewood Golf Course be 'NA King Par er, Chair Waa WN, .Randy Corman, Vice Chaf �N Don Persson, Member cc: Victoria Runkle, Finance & Information Services Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Leslie Beilach, Parks Director Kelly Beymer, Golf Course Manager FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 8, 2003 2003 YEAR END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (Referred November 24, 2003) 1 COUNCIL Date /a- S - R603 The Finance Committee recommends adoption of the 2003 Year End Budget Adjustment Ordinance, which appropriates funds from fund balance and new revenue increasing 2003 expenditures in various funds and departments,=Thi§, ordinance will increase the 2003' budget by $9,176,407: t ?.,. The Committee further recommends that -,theme dinance'regArdit this matter "be presented for fir ski' 8NA Don Persson, Member cc: Victoria Runkle, Finance & Information Services Administrator Elaine Gregory, Fiscal, Services Director Sylvia Doerschel, Finance Analyst Supervisor I:\COMMI TE\Reports\Finance\2003\2003 Year End Budget Adjustments.rpt.doc APPPMVED By CGrit COUNCIL Data /a- 8- R003 AD HOC COUNCIL COMMUNICIATIONS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 8; 2003 New Council E-mail Policy and Revised Council Correspondence and Agenda Policy (Referred 2/10/2003) After countless drafts were reviewed during eleven meetings of the committee in the previous 9 months, the Ad Hoc Council Communications Committee recommends adoption of new Council Policy and Procedure, number 800-11 entitled "Council E-Mail," for the purpose of facilitating e-mail communication between and among Councilmembers, City staff, citizens, and others; to establish procedures for retenti-o of a -mail messages in compliance with the Public Records Disclosure Act, and to assist Coun6ftmejnbers in complying with the Open Public Meetings Act and other apl lic b�le laws. N 1 The. Committee also Correspondence and A mail correspondence. addressed to the City C, ism` adoption of s xe number 800-04, to The. Committee further recomen mds athat the; Co uncil Policy and Procedure docu, ments _r By approval of this comniittee report; Council agr+ Committee's assignment is complete Terri Brierf, Chair Dan Cla , ice hair jandy Corman, Member cc: Jay Covington Zanetta Fontes the existing .Council policy and to include e- lures for. correspondence be OAhorized to sign the two Ad Hoc Communications CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. .467,? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) ENTITLED "COMMUTE ' TRIP REDUCTION IMPLEMENTATION." WHEREAS, the City .of Renton, pursuant to the Commute Trip Reduction Act, is required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to the City; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), by law, distributes these funds; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the WSDOT will distribute commute trip reduction funds to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in allrespects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with WSDOT entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Implementation." 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1001:8/11 /03 day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3l,73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY ENTITLED "COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION ACT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT." WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Commute Trip Reduction Act, is required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to the City; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation, by law, distributes these funds to the counties, which in turn distributes the funds to the cities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the county will distribute commute trip reduction funds to the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has previously entered into similar contracts for commute trip reduction funds; , 0 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Act Implementation Agreement" and later similar contracts that have the same general purpose, terms and funding. 1 1 r RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 92003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1011:9/22/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor F) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3(% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ENCOURAGING THE WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE, THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, KING COUNTY AND AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS TO JOIN IN WORKING TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND CAPACITY ON THE SR-169 CORRIDOR. WHEREAS, SR-169 is an important transportation corridor for both commuters and commercial vehicles; linking the cities of Enumclaw, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and Renton; and intersecting with SR-164, SR-516, SR-18, and I-405; and WHEREAS, significant growth has taken place recently along the SR-169 corridor and now there are parts of the highway that clearly need more capacity and safety improvements to catch up with this growth wave; and WHEREAS, significant future growth is still projected to come along this overburdened corridor, as it remains one of the areas with the greatest growth capacity in King County as defined by the Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, there are significant safety issues on SR-169 for our youth, since several schools — with minimal sidewalk access — border the highway; and and WHEREAS, there are frequent accidents and fatalities along some stretches of the road; WHEREAS, the cities along the corridor each have already invested considerable funds to make improvements within their city boundaries to this State highway; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, substantial traffic delays take place along several choke points on the corridor, particularly in the unincorporated area between Renton and Maple Valley where SR-169 is reduced to just two lanes; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation in previous years has proposed to the Legislature that money be allocated to fund a corridor study of SR-169, but due to competing requests the Legislature has yet to allocate this needed funding; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure that this vital corridor receives attention and funding, a consortium of interested parties has been formed, consisting of the cities, chambers of commerce, and school districts along the SR-169 corridor; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS. FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Corridor Study. The City of Renton strongly urges the Washington State Department of Transportation to carry out the previously proposed SR-169 corridor study as quickly as possible. The Washington State Legislature and State Transportation Commission are encouraged to allocate funds and give their support for this important study to happen. The City of Renton will consider programming a fair share contribution to the SR 169 Corridor Study consistent with other jurisdictions along this corridor in the City's 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program SECTION H. County Reclassification. Only part of SR-169 currently has the classification as being part of the county "regional arterial network." We strongly urge King County to reclassify the remaining portion of this highway so that it, too, is in the regional arterial network. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1017:11/12/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 3 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 36 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT TO MODIFY THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT RELATED TO ESTABLISHMENT OF SERVICE BOUNDARIES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Skyway Water and Sewer District both provide water and sewer services to citizens within the greater Renton area; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Skyway Water and Sewer District have previously established the boundaries where each would provide sanitary sewer service as documented in a 1994 agreement; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Skyway Water and Sewer District have previously established the boundaries where each would provide water service as documented in a 1998 agreement; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr — Lakeridge Water and Sewer District have not previously established the boundaries where each would provide sanitary sewer service; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr — Lakeridge Water and Sewer District have followed boundaries where each would provide water service as established in the 1999 update of the Skyway Coordinated System Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr — Lakeridge Water and Sewer District and Skyway Water and Sewer District merged in 1999 to form the current Skyway Water and Sewer District; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend those agreements to acknowledge the current Skyway Water and Sewer District and to slightly modify the water and sewer service boundaries; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Skyway Water and Sewer District amending the 1994 sanitary sewer and 1998 water agreements by amending the water and sewer service boundaries. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE S .1024:11 /21 /03 : ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PROVIDING FOR THE 2003 YEAR END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS. SECTION I. The following funds are hereby amended as follows: Fund No. Fund Description 2003 Adjusted Budget Budget Adjustment 2003 Amended Budget 000 General Fund $44,889,300 $1,270,300 $46,159,600 104 Community Development Block Grant $303,800 $32,761 $336,561 106 Library Fund $1,480,300 $32,000 $1,512,300 215 General Governmental Miscellaneous Debt Service $1,871,300 $275,000 $2,146,300 301 Parking Garage Fund $4,003,575 ($80,000) $3,923,575 304 Fire Impact Mitigation Fund $3,634,800 $885,000 $4,519,800 316 Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund $8,509,700 $195,000 $8,314,700 402 Airport Fund $2,145,225 $3,040,000 $5,1859225 451 Waterworks Bond Reserve Fund $2,920,400 $3,056,852 $5,977,252 501 Equipment Rental Fund $39014,600 $359,494 $3,374,094 502 Insurance Fund $9,053,400 $500,000 $9,553,500 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $9,176,407 TOTAL UNANTICIPATED REVENUE, TRANSFER OF $9,176,407 FUNDS AND FUND BALANCE SECTION II. The monies for the budget adjustments shown in Section I are derived from the following sources. Fund No. Detail Budget Adjustment Source 000 Reallocation from Miscellaneous Non -Departmental to the ($305,200) Reallocation Police Department 000 Barbee Mills and Boeing Environmental Impact Statements $1,000,000 Reimbursement from a licant ORDINANCE NO. Fund No. Detail Budget Adjustment Source 000 2003 Police Department salaries and benefits $375,500 Reallocation from Misc, Non Departmental and Fund Balance 000 Fire Department Industrial Insurance and LEOFF I medical $200,000 Fund Balance 104 Additional grant fimds awarded $32,761 Grant Revenue 106 Library overtime and temporary salaries for jury duty $32,000 Fund Balance 215 Increase Budget authority for Valley Communications debt service payment $275,000 REET 301 Reduction of budget authority $80,000 304 Additional construction costs for Fire Station 12 $885,000 Fund Balance 316 Reduction of budget authority for Valley Communications debt service payment to Fund 215 ($275,000) 316 Additional costs for the Pavilion $80,000 Fund Balance 402 Runway/ Taxiway Lighting Signage & Paving project $3,040,000 Fund Balance 451 Transfer out Bond Reserve to Fund 461 $2,606,852 Fund Balance 451 Additional Debt Service $450,000 Fund Balance 501 Transfer out to Insurance Fund $359,494 Fund Balance 502 Additional liability costs $500,000 Transfer out from Fund 501 and Fund Balance TOTAL $9176 407 SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days aftei publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk N ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 108 5 :11 / 18 /0 3 : ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 3 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2004. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. After due notice and public hearing thereon as provided by law, the annual budget for the City of Renton for the year 2004, previously prepared and filed with the City Clerk, as modified hereby, be and is hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted, in all respects, as such annual budget for the year 2004. Such annual budget is detailed in Attachment A, 2004 Budget Summary by Fund, Resources and Expenditures, which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. A future ordinance, to be adopted in December 2003, fixes the amount of tax levies necessary for the year 2004. SECTION II. Attachment A defines the total sums authorized and allowed for expenditures and establishes such sums in each of the funds in the annual 2004 budget. SECTION M. . Acts pursuant to this Ordinance, but prior to its. passage or effective date, are hereby ratified and confirmed. SECTION IV. A copy of the annual 2004 budget, as herein adopted, shall be transmitted to the Office of the State Auditor, Division of Municipal Corporations, and such other governmental agencies as provided by law. SECTION V. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. 1 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1053:11/3/03:ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 2003. day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor E .I ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 2003 Budget Summary By Fund, Resources and Expenditures 2004 2004 Fund Resources Expenditures GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS: 000/General 007/Parking Garage Maintenance 101/Park 103/Street 106/Library 201/ Ltd G.O. Bonds/Gen. Govt. Misc. Debt Sery 207/1978 Limited G.O. Bonds 212/1989 Limited Ref. G.O. Bonds 215/Gen. Govt. Misc. Debt Service SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 102/Arterial Street 104/Community Dev Block Grant I I O/Hotel/Motel Fund 118/Reserve for Paths & Trails 125/1% For Art 127/Cable Communication 131/Park Memorial DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: 213/1983 Unlim, Ref. G.O. Bonds 219/1989 Uplimited G.O. Bonds 220/L.I.D. Debt Service Fund 221/L.I.D. Guaranty Fund CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (CIP): 301/Garage CIP 303/Community Dev. Mitigation Fund 304/Fire Mitigation Fund 305 Transportation Mitigation Fund 306/Leased City Properties 307/Aquatics Center 316/Municipal Facilities CIP 317/Transportation CIP $45,437,900 $45,437,900 68,700 68,700 10,270,300 10,270,300 6,055,400 6,055,400 1,532,200 1,532,200 654,300 654,300 28,900 28,900 0 0 1,872,900 1,872,900 353,500 353,500 331,600 331,600 200,000 200,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 36,600 36,600 0 0 0 0 511,500 511;500 17,300 17,300 0 0 138,700 138,700 0 0 300,000 300,000 1,389,300 1,389,300 576,800 576,800 0 0 2,507,000 2,507,000 9,160,400 9,160,400 I of 2 ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 2003 Budget Summary By Fund, Resources and Expenditures 2004 2004 Fund Resources Expenditures ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 401/Waterworks Utility 20,805,900 20,805900 402/Airport 805,900 805:900 403/Solid Waste Utility 8,718,100 8,718,100 404/Golf Course 2,288,800 2,288,800 421/Waterworks Utility Construction 16,830,000 16,830,000 424/Golf Course Capital Fund 320,000 320,000 45 1 /Waterworks Revenue Bond Fund 2,518,400 2,518,400 46 1 /Waterworks Bond Reserve 0 0 471/Waterworks Rate Stablilization 0 0 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 501/Equipment Rental 2,520,400 2,520,400 502/Insurance 2,721,300 2,721,300 512/Healthcare Insurance 6,296,300 6,296,300 FIDUCIARY FUNDS: 601/Firemen's Pension 382,100 382,100 TOTALS $145,700,500 $145,700,500 2 of 2 I e CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, INCREASING COMMUNITY SERVICES 2004 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the Athletic Field Lights fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Attachment A authorizes the Athletic Field Lights fees for 2004. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2004. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 1 Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1054:11 /3/03:ma ORDINANCE NO. ATTACIRvIENT A 2004 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS FEE PROPOSAL SOFTBALL & BASEBALL ADULT USE Current Proposed Resident Practice Fee $10.00/hour same Resident Softball Game Fee $15.00/1.5 hours same Resident Baseball Game Fee $30.00/3 hours same Resident Prep Fee $20.00/hour same Resident Field Lights Fee $10.00/hour $12.00/hour Non-resident Practice Fee $12.00/hour same Non-resident Softball Game Fee $18.00/1.5 hours same Non-resident Baseball Prep Fee $36.00/3 hours same Non-resident Prep Fee $24.00 same Non -Resident Field Lights Fee $12.00/hour $15.00/hour SOFTBALL & BASEBALL YOUTH USE Current Proposed Resident Practice Fee $10.00/hour same Resident Game Fee $20.00/2 hours same Resident Prep Fee $20.00 same Resident Field Lights $10.00/hour $12.00/hour Non-resident Practice Fee $12.00/hour same Non-resident Game Fee $24.00/2 hours same Non-resident Prep Fee $24.00 same Non -Resident Field Lights $12.00/hour $15.00/hour Resident Practice Fee Resident Game Fee Resident Prep Fee Resident Field Lights Non-resident Practice Fee Non-resident Game Fee Non-resident Prep Fee Non -Resident Field Lights Resident Practice Fee Resident Game Fee Resident Prep Fee Resident Field Lights ORDINANCE NO. SOCCER ADULT USE Current $10.00/hour $20.00/2 hours $30.00 $10.00/hour $12.00/hour $24.00/2 hours $36.00 $12.00/hour SOCCER YOUTH USE Current $10.00/hour $20.00/2 hours $30.00 $10.00/hour 0 Proposed same same same $12.00/hour same same same $15.00/hour Proposed same same same $12.00/hour Non-resident Practice Fee $12.00/hour same Non-resident Game Fee $24.00/2 hours same Non-resident Prep Fee $36.00 same Non -Resident Field Lights $12.00/hour $15.00/hour i 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, INCREASING COMMUNITY SERVICES' 2004 BOAT LAUNCH FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the Boat Launch fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASMNGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Attachment A authorizes the Boat Launch fees for 2004. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2004. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 312003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: _ ORD.1056:11/3/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 1 ORDINANCE NO. ATTACIRVIENT A 2004 COULON BOAT LAUNCH FEE PROPOSAL PEA%SEASON MAY I THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30 FRIDAY, SATURDAYAND SUNDAY Fee Menu: Current Proposed Non-resident day use (launch and parking, if available) $10.00 $10.00 Non-resident overnight Resident day use (parking) with free sticker Resident overnight $19.00 $20.00 $2.00 $5.00 $4.00 $10.00 Annual Permit: Current Proposed Non-resident $50.00 $60.00 Resident $15.00 $30.00 Senior resident $10.00 N/A Additional sticker $5.00 same PEAK SEASON MAY I THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30 MONDAY, TUESDAY, "DNESDAY, THURSDAY Fee Menu: Current Proposed Non-resident day use (launch and parking, if available) $5.00 $10.00 Non-resident overnight $10.00 $20.00 Resident day use (parking) with free sticker $2.00 $5.00 Resident overnight $4.00 $10.00 OFF SEASON OCTOBER I THROUGHAPRIL 30 Fee Menu: Current Proposed Non-resident day use (launch and parking if available) $3.00 $10.00 Resident day use (parking with free sticker) Overnight (not available) $2.00 $5.00 N/A N/A 0j, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5-1, FEE SCHEDULE, OF TITLE V (FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY SETTING AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSION FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the Aquatic Center Admission fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Chapter 5-1, Fee Schedule, of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new section, 5-1-7, to read as follows: 5-1-7: AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSION FEES: Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: Resident Children 4 and younger Free Non-resident Children 4 and younger Free Resident Youth 5-17 $4.00 Non-resident Youth 5-17 $6.00 Resident Adult $6.00 Non-resident Adult $12.00 Resident Senior $5.00 Non-resident Senior $6.00 ORDINANCE NO. Resident Lap Swim Only $3.00 Non-resident Lap Swim Only $4.00 Resident Locker Rental $0.50 Non-resident Locker Rental $0.50 Resident Tube Rental $1.00 Non-resident Tube Rental $1.00 SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective on its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1058:11/3/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, INCREASING COMMUNITY SERVICES' 2004 RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER DAMAGE DEPOSIT FEES AND AFTER HOURS FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the Renton Community Center Damage Deposit fees and the Renton Community Center After Hours fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Attachment A authorizes the Renton Community Center Damage Deposit fees and Renton Community Center After Hours fees for 2004. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2004. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1060:11/3/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor F? ORDINANCE NO. .iUTl► 2004 RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER DAMAGE DEPOSIT AND RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER AFTER HOURS FEES PROPOSAL Renton Community Center Damage Deposit Current Resident $200.00 Non-resident $200.00 Renton Community Center After Hours Fees Current Resident $60.00/hour Non-resident $75.00/hour Renton Community Center Gym Rental Fees Current Resident Half Gym $15.00/hour Non-resident Half Gym $18.00/hour Resident Full Gym $30.00/hour Non-resident Full Gym $36.00/hour Resident Double Gym $60.00/hour Non-resident Double Gym $72.00/hour Resident Special Events Full Gym $450.00/hour Non-resident Special Events Full Gym $540.00/hour Resident Special Events Double Gym $900.00/hour Non-resident Special Events Double Gym $1080.00/hour Renton Community Center Fitness Room Passeard Fees Proposed $400.00 $400.00 Proposed $150.00/hour $150.00/hour Proposed same same same same same same same same same same Current Proposed One Month Pass Resident Adult $30.00 same Non-resident Adult $36.00 same Resident Student/Senior $20.00 same Non-resident Student/Senior $24.00 same Resident Cardin Only $20.00 same Non-resident Cardio Only $24.00 same Resident Couples $40.00 same Non-resident Couples $48.00 same Resident Family $60.00 same Non-resident Family $72.00 same 3 ORDINANCE NO. Three Month Pass Resident Adult $80.00 same Non-resident Adult $96.00 same Resident Student/Senior $50.00 same Non-resident Student/Senior $60.00 same Resident Couples $100.00 same Non-resident Couples $120.00 same Six Month Pass Resident Adult $150.00 same Non-resident Adult $180.00 same Resident Student/Senior $100.00 same Non-resident Student/Senior $120.00 same Resident Couples $200.00 same Non-resident Couples $240.00 same Racquetball Pass Resident Adult $53.20 same Non-resident Adult $64.00 same Resident Student/Senior $45.60 same Non-resident Student/Senior $55.00 same Renton Community Center Drop -In Fees Current Proposed Resident Aerobics $5.00 same Non-resident Aerobics $6.00 same Resident Basketball $2.50 same Non-resident Basketball $3.00 same Resident Volleyball $2.50 same Non-resident Volleyball $3.00 same Resident Fitness $3.50 same Non-resident Fitness $4.25 same Resident Cardio Only $1.50 same Non-resident Cardio Only $1.75 same Resident Shower $1.00 same Non-resident Shower $1.00 same Resident Racquetball $7.60 same Non-resident Racquetball $9.00 same Resident Wallyball $10.85 same Non-resident Wallyball $13.00 same 4 l 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, INCREASING COMMUNITY SERVICES' 2004 GENE COULON PARK PICNIC SHELTERS FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the Gene Coulon Park Picnic Shelters' fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASIUNGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Attachment A authorizes the Gene Coulon Park Picnic Shelters fees for 2004. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2004. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Jesse Tanner, Mayor 0111" 1 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1059:11 /3/03 :ma ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 2004 GENE COULON PARK PICNIC SHELTERS FEE PROPOSAL Resident Half Day (8am-12pm) Resident Half Day (1 pm-5pm) Resident Half Day (6pm-sunset) Non-resident Half Day (8am-12pm) Non-resident Half Day (1pm-5pm) Non-resident Half Day (6pm-sunset) Resident Full Day (groups under 75) Resident Full Day (groups over 75) Resident Full Day (groups over 200) Non-resident Full Day (groups under 75) Non-resident Full Day (groups over 75) Non-resident Full Day (groups over 200) HALF DAY Current Fees $15.00 $25.00 $25.00 FULL DAY $20.00 $30.00 $30.00 Current Fees $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $70.00 $100.00 $120.00 Proposed Fees $25.00 same same $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Proposed Fees same same same $100.00 $150.00 $200.00 3 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW FUND TITLED "INSURANCE HEALTHCARE FUND" FOR THE YEAR 2004. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. A new Internal Service Fund shall be created — Fund 512 — Insurance Healthcare Fund. The purpose of the fund is to provide accounting for self-insurance services to all City departments for health care programs. The Insurance Healthcare Fund will pay expenses and revenue will be provided by rates charged to departments based on use and coverage requirements. SECTION II. All healthcare related revenue and expenses previously contained in Fund 502 — Insurance Fund shall be transferred to Fund 512 - Insurance Healthcare Fund. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. -PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 1 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1055:11/3/03:ma CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL- 8 ZONING TO CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING. FILE NO. LUA- 02-139 (DALPAY ET AL.) WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260, known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as Residential-8; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 15, 2003, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby ' rezoned to Center Neighborhood (CN), as herein below specified and subject to the Development Agreement for this rezone, which was adopted by resolution. The Neighborhood and Strategic 1 ORDINANCE NO. :. Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property consisting of approximately 2.32 acres located on the 3800 and 3900 blocks of NE 120' Street beginning 126 feet north of the public right-of-way.) SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as.to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1065 :11 / 13 /03 : ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 d;, EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR "CN" ZONING AREA: THE NORTH 229.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 385.00 FEET OF THE WEST 451.09 FEET OF THE EAST 731.09 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 36.50 FEET OF THE WEST 50.00 FEET THEREOF. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON Exhibit "B" S� �S 4&Z a N D NE 12th St m z m m 0 CD m Dalpay Rezone (2003-M-12) R-8 to CN 0 200 400 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator � ° 8 0' I eDO R°November 2003 1 : 2400 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL- 8 ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL-10 ZONING. FILE NO. LUA-02-139 (DALPAY ET AL.) WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as Residential-8; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 15, 2003, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential-10 (R-10), as herein below specified and subject to the Development Agreement for this rezone, which was adopted by resolution. The Neighborhood and Strategic 1 ORDINANCE NO. Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property consisting of approximately 1.16 acres located on the 3800 and 3900 blocks of NE 12 Street extending as far as 126 feet north of the public right-of-way.) SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 92003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1066:11/13/03 Jesse Tanner, Mayor N I LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR "R-10" ZONING AREA: THE SOUTH 156.00 FEET OF THE WEST 401.09 FEET OF THE EAST 681.09 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON Exhibit "B" S4 �s a R 0- NE 12th St CD z m CD 0 L CD m Dalpay Rezone (2003-M-12) R-8 to R-10 0 200 400 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pictsch, Administrator G.DelRosario 1 24UU �O 19 November 2003 I e .1, 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY - INFILL ZONING, TO RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC ZONING. FILE NO. LUA-01-162, 2003-M-08 (MERLINO). WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as Residential Multi -family Infill (RM-I); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 15'", 2003, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 10 du/ac (R-10), as herein below specified and subject to the Development Agreement for this rezone, which was adopted by resolution. The Neighborhood 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1% 1 Y and Strategic Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property consisting of approximately 25.68 acres immediately east of the Sunset View Apartments and south of SW Sunset Boulevard and north of the BN-SF Railroad right-of-way.) SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1068:11 /13/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 Exhibit "A" .e u SR 900 L.L.C. (MERLINO) 2003 COMP PL- AN AMENDMENTS LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM RM-1 TO RO 2000—M-08 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 7 and the Southeast quarter, both in Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the southerly right-of-way margin of Martin Luther King Junior Way (SR 900, SW Sunset Blvd., Primary State Ifighway No. 2), easterly of the west line of said Government Lot 7, and northerly of the northerly right of way margin of Pacific Coast Railroad (Burlington Northern Railroad) right of way; EXCEPT that portion of said Southeast quarter lying southerly of a line beginning at the northwesterly corner of Lot 15, Block 13 of the plat of Earlington Addition, as recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 7, records of King County, Washington, and ending said line a distance of 1250 feet westerly at a point on the northerly right of way margin of the Pacific Coast Railroad (Burlington Northern), said point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracks of said Pacific Coast Railroad at a point therein distance about 2050 feet westerly, as measured along said centerline of the main tracks as now located along said right of way, from the intersection of said centerline with the east line of said Section 13; and EXCEPT that portion of said Government Lot 7 and said Southeast quarter lying southerly of the southerly line of vacated Beacon Coal Mine Road and westerly of the northerly projection of the west line of Adjusted Lot 1 of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-92-070-LLA, recorded under King CountyRecording No. 9205219005, records of King County, Washington. Exhibit "B" (2003-M-08) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario i 9 November 2003