HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 11/10/2003101
U
AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
November 10, 2003
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
4. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 3, 2003. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 11/05/2003 for CAG-03-154, 2003 Downtown Sidewalk and
Curb Ramp; eight bids; engineer's estimate $133,325.20; and submits staff recommendation to
award the contract to the low bidder, R&J Landscape and Construction, in the amount of
$116,070.25. Council concur.
c. Court Case filed by Charles S. Hamilton, III, 600 Market Place One, 2003 Western Ave., Seattle,
98121, representing Curtis McDaniel, alleging negligence, false arrest and false imprisonment,
and assault and battery in connection with his arrest by Renton police officers on 5/09/2002.
Refer to City Attorney & Insurance Services.
d. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of dedication of additional right-of-way
at the intersection of Meadow Ave. N. and N. 24th St. to fulfill a requirement of the Reed Short
Plat (SHP-03-062). Council concur.
e. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a
public hearing be set on 11/24/2003 to consider the prezoning of R-8 for the Falk Annexation;
6.43 acres bounded by S. 47th St. to the north, SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to
the east. Council concur.
f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits pre -
application for 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 0.2 acres located at 2904 Maple
Valley Hwy. to change land use designation from Residential Options (RO), zoned R-10, to
Convenience Commercial (CC) with a concurrent rezone to CC (Jones rezone). Refer to
Planning & Development Committee.
g. Finance and Information Services Department recommends a public hearing be set on
11/24/2003 to consider the 2004 City of Renton Final Budget. Council concur.
h. Planning/Building/Public Works Department requested approval to update -the Utility System
Development Charges that new development is assessed to hook-up to the City's water,
wastewater, and surface water utilities. Refer to Utilities Committee.
i. Transportation Systems Division requested authorization to transfer $150,000 from the Airport
Reserve Fund to the 2003 Airport Taxiway Paving, Lighting and Signage Improvement project
(CAG-03-037) to cover costs related to soil contamination remediation. Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
,A
j. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of funds in the amount of $100,000 to
convert Airport buildings from the existing Boeing -owned power system to City -owned utilities,
and approval of a contract with W&H Pacific, Inc. in the amount of $79,794.76 for this
conversion. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
k. Utility Systems Division recommends acceptance of dedication of additional right-of-way near
the 1300 block of N. 34th St. from Daniel N. Dahlquist. Council concur.
1. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-97-139, Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction;
and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of
$207.60, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $15,425.45 to
Omega Contractors, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
m. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum #3 to CAG-02-010, contract with
Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., for unanticipated additional design work for the
Maplewood Water Treatment facility in the amount of $90,000. Council concur.
6. CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Randy and Rosemary Leifer, 5127 S. Fountain St., Seattle, 98178, owners of the property
located at 15311 SE 128th St., which is part of the proposed Bales Annexation. They stated that they
mistakenly voted against the R-5 zoning at the Special Election, and would like the property to be
annexed at R-5. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
7. OLD BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the chairman if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: 2003 Neighborhood Grant Program Recommendations
b. Finance Committee: Maplewood Golf Course Greens Fees Increase*
c. King County Wastewater Treatment Plant (South Plant) Agreements & Mitigation Allocation*
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Resolution:
King County Wastewater Treatment Plant sewage disposal odor & chemical use agreement (see 7.c.)
Ordinance for first reading:
Maplewood Golf Course greens fees increase (see 7.b
9. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
10. AUDIENCE COMMENT
1 1 A T) TO TR N1VIRNT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Chambers
5:00 p.m.
Budget Discussions;
Boeing Comprehensive Plan & Zoning
* Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk *
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
November 10, 2003
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the
meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TERRI BRIERE; KING
COUNCILMEMBERS
PARKER; DON PERSSON; TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON. MOVED
BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL
EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED.
CITY STAFF IN
JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE
LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk;
GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;
ABDOUL GAFOUR, Water Utility Supervisor; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic
Development Administrator; KELLY BEYMER, Golf Course Manager;
DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER KATHLEEN
MCCLINCY, Police Department.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT
report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted
included:
• Rotary Club of Renton members and City of Renton employees are
volunteering to serve Thanksgiving Dinner at the Renton Senior Activity
Center, which will be open on November 27, 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., for
senior citizens to enjoy a day of social and recreational activities. Senior
citizens must pick up a free ticket prior to November 25 for their meal
reservation and transportation request.
• The City follows an Integrated Pest Management approach that uses a
variety of strategies to prevent and control pest problems at parks in
Renton. For details about this approach, visit the Spotlight section of the
City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us, pick up a brochure at City Hall or
the Community Center, or call 425-430-6600.
Utility: NE loth St/Anacortes Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman reported on
Ave NE Storm System a difficult utility conflict related to the NE loth St. and Anacortes Ave. NE
Improvement Project, Utility Detention Pond and Storm System Improvement project, which involves a new
Conflict 12-inch drain line being installed in Anacortes Ct. NE and an existing
underground Puget Sound Energy (PSE) power line in NE loth St. He
explained that due to slope constraints and the existence of other utilities, the
drain line cannot be raised or lowered, and there is no slack in the buried PSE
power lines. Therefore, PSE must remove a portion of the underground power
line and reroute it over the top of the storm water line.
Continuing, Mr. Zimmerman stated that this power line reroute entails a four to
six hour power outage that will affect approximately 270 customers, including
Hazen High School. PSE posted notices door-to-door on November 6
informing customers of the power outage that starts at 9:00 a.m. on November
11. He noted that due to the Veteran's Day holiday, Hazen High School will
not be in session that day.
November 10, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 398
Responding to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's and Mayor Tanner's
inquiries, Mr. Zimmerman assured that the City would check with PSE to
confirm that concerns have been addressed regarding residents with special
needs or medical equipment, and residents with older furnaces that have pilot
lights needing relighting after the power outage.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 3, 2003. Council concur.
November 3, 2003
CAG: 03-154, 2003
City Clerk reported bid opening on 11/05/2003 for CAG-03-154, 2003
Downtown Sidewalk & Curb
Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp; eight bids; engineer's estimate
Ramp, R&J Landscape and
$133,325.20; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the
Construction
low bidder, R&J Landscape and Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$116,070.25. Council concur.
Court Case: Curtis McDaniel,
Court Case filed in King County Superior Court by Charles S. Hamilton, III,
CRT-03-007
600 Market Place One, 2003 Western Ave., Seattle, 98121, representing Curtis
McDaniel, alleging negligence, false arrest and false imprisonment, and assault
and battery in connection with his arrest by Renton police officers on
5/09/2002. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
Development Services: Reed
Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of
Short Plat ROW Dedication,
additional right-of-way for a 15-foot corner radius at the intersection of
Meadow Ave N & N 24th St
Meadow Ave. N. and N. 24th St. to fulfill a requirement of the Reed Short Plat
(SHP-03-062). Council concur.
Annexation: Falk, S 47th St &
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
102nd Ave SE
recommended a public hearing be set on 11/24/2003 to consider the prezoning
of R-8 for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S. 47th St. to the north,
SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Council concur.
Comp Plan: 2004 Amendment
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Pre -Application, 2904 Maple
submitted pre -application for 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 0.2
Valley Hwy
acres located at 2904 Maple Valley Hwy. to change land use designation from
Residential Options (RO), zoned R-10, to Convenience Commercial (CC) with
a concurrent rezone to CC (Jones Rezone). Refer to Planning and Development
Committee.
Budget: 2004 Annual City of
Finance and Information Services Department recommended a public hearing
Renton
be set on 11/24/2003 to consider the proposed 2004 City of Renton Final
Budget. Council concur.
Utility: Utility System
Planning/Building/Public Works Department requested approval to update the
Development Charges
Utility System Development Charges that new development is assessed to
hook-up to the City's water, wastewater, and surface water utilities. Refer to
Utilities Committee.
Airport: Runway/Taxiway
Transportation Systems Division requests authorization to transfer $150,000
Lighting Signage & Paving
from the Airport Reserve Fund to the 2003 Airport Taxiway Paving, Lighting
Project, Transfer of Funds
and Signage Improvement project (CAG-03-037) to cover costs related to soil
contamination remediation. Council concur.
November 10, 2003
Renton City Council Minutes Page 399
Airport: Building Utility
Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of funds in the
Conversion, W&H Pacific
amount of $100,000 to convert Airport buildings from the existing Boeing -
owned power system to City -owned utilities, and approval of a contract with
W&H Pacific, Inc. in the amount of $79,794.76 for this conversion. Refer to
Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Utility: ROW Dedication at N
Utility Systems Division recommended acceptance of dedication of additional
34th St, Daniel Dahlquist
right-of-way for a 20-foot wide by 227-foot long strip of land located near the
1300 block of N. 34th St. from Daniel N. Dahlquist. Council concur.
CAG: 97-139, Maplewood
Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-97-139, Maplewood Well 12 Well
Well 12 Well Head
Head Construction; and requested approval of the project, authorization for
Construction, Omega
final pay estimate in the amount of $207.60, commencement of 60-day lien
Contractors
period, and release of retained amount of $15,425.45 to Omega Contractors,
Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
CAG: 02-010, Maplewood
Utility Systems Division recommended approval of Addendum #3 to CAG-02-
Water Treatment
010, contract with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., for unanticipated
Improvements Design,
additional design work for the Maplewood Water Treatment facility in the
Economic & Engineering
amount of $90,000. Council concur.
Services
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE
Correspondence was read from Randy and Rosemary Leifer, 5127 S. Fountain
Citizen Comment: Leifer -
St., Seattle, 98178, owners of the property located at 15311 SE 128th St., which
Bales Annexation R-5 Zoning
is part of the proposed Bales Annexation. They stated that they mistakenly
voted against R-5 zoning at the Special Election, and emphasized that they do
want the property to be zoned R-5. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS
CORRESPONDENCE TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS
Utilities Committee Vice Chair Briere presented a report recommending
Utilities Committee
concurrence with the recommendation of staff that City Council authorize the
Utility: Wastewater Treatment
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement with King County for
Plant Agreements &
the South Plant (Wastewater Treatment Plant) electrical cogeneration project,
Mitigation, King County
and the amendment to the Wastewater Treatment Plant sewage disposal
agreement with King County.
The Committee also recommended that the $2,216,000 in mitigation funds
identified in the electrical cogeneration project agreement be referred to the
Committee of the Whole for appropriation. The Committee further
recommended that the resolution regarding the amendment to the King County
sewage disposal agreement be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED
BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 401 for resolution.)
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending concurrence
Community Services: in the staff and Park Board recommendation to increase golf course fees. from
Maplewood Golf Course Fees $22 to $24 for 18-hole weekday green fees, from $28 to $30 for weekend
(Friday - Sunday) 18-hole green fees, and from $22 to $24 for 18-hole golf cart
rental. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this
matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY
PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. (See page 401 for ordinance.)
November 10, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 400
Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report regarding the
Committee recommendations for the second round of the 2003 neighborhood grant
EDNSP: 2003 Neighborhood projects. After review of the applications, the Committee recommended
Grant Program approval of the following grant applications: .
• Highlands Community Association - Landscape around existing
neighborhood entrance sign located at Jefferson Ave. NE and NE 3rd St.
($700.25);
• Ginger Creek Community Association - Continue development of a
neighborhood urban park on a Seattle Public Utilities owned right-of-way
in Renton. The area is approximately a quarter of an acre and is bordered
by Puget Dr. SE, Beacon Way SE, and SE 16th St. ($2,542.56);
• Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association - Reclaim a piece of abandoned City
of Renton right-of-way property and create a neighborhood urban park
($1,950.31);
• Windwood Homeowners Association - Landscape around neighborhood
entrance sign and common areas ($1,683.22); and
• Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association - Construct and install a
neighborhood entrance sign located at S. 16th St. and Talbot Rd. S.
($4,060).
The Committee also recommended approval of the following administrative
newsletter applications:
• Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association - Annual printing expenses for a
newsletter printed and hand delivered twice a year ($300); and
• Windwood Homeowners Association - Annual printing expenses for a
newsletter printed and delivered quarterly ($109).
The Committee recommended that five neighborhood project grants, totaling
$10,936.34, two neighborhood newsletter applications, totaling $409, and a
contingency fund of $1,094, as previously approved by Council on April 21,
2003, be approved, for a grand total of $12,439.34. The Committee further
recommended that a special presentation be scheduled for the Council meeting
of November 24, 2003, to award the grant certificates to the grant recipients.
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Responding to Councilwoman Briere's inquiry regarding whether there is a
maximum grant amount allowed per neighborhood group, Councilwoman
Nelson stated that there is not as long as funds are available, the project meets
City guidelines, and the group has sufficient sweat equity. She explained that
in the case of the Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association, the funded projects
are for two different areas of the neighborhood. Economic Development
Administrator Alex Pietsch added that the 2003 Neighborhood Program budget
is $50,000.
ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption:
RESOLUTIONS.
November 10, 2003
Renton City Council Minutes Page 401
Resolution #3665
A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Cites to enter into an
Utility: Wastewater Treatment
interlocal agreement with King County entitled "City of Renton King County
Plant Sewage Disposal Odor
Amendment to Agreement for Sewage Disposal Agreement Regarding Odor
Agreement, King County,
and Chemical Use at South Plant (Wastewater Treatment Plant)." MOVED BY
CAG-61-636
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 11/17/2003 for second and final reading:
Community Services:
An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V, Finance
Maplewood Golf Course Fees
and Business Regulations, of City Code by increasing certain Maplewood Golf
Course greens fees and the golf cart fee. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED
BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 11/17/2003. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
Utility: Rates
SUBJECT OF UTILITY RATES TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:04 p.m.
BONNIE I. WAI.'I'f3N, City Clerl;
Recorder: Michele Neumann
November 10, 2003
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING '
November 10, 2003
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MON., 11/17
Boeing Comprehensive Plan & Zoning;
(Keolker-Wheeler)
5:30 p.m.
Budget Discussions
COMMUNITY SERVICES
MON., 11/17
Community Services Department Budget
(Nelson)
5:00 p.m.
(briefing only)
FINANCE
MON., 11/17
Vouchers;
(Parker)
3:00 p.m.
Administrative, Judicial and Legal
Services Department Budget (briefing
only);
Human Resources & Risk Management
Department Budget (briefing only);
Finance & Information Services
Department Budget (briefing only)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
THURS., 11/13
Economic Development, Neighborhoods
(Briere)
3:00 p.m.
& Strategic Planning Department Budget
(briefing only);*Council Conference
Room*
2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
*Council Chambers*
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Clawson)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Persson)
UTILITIES
THURS., 11/13
Utility Division Budget (briefing only);
(Corman)
4:00 p.m.
Utility System Development Charges
Increase;
Utility Rates
l
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 10, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Rotary Club of Renton members and City of Renton employees are volunteering to serve Thanksgiving Dinner
at the Renton Senior Activity Center. The Center, located at 211 Burnett Avenue North, will be open on
Thursday, November 27th, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for senior citizens to enjoy a day of social and
recreational activities. A free holiday meal, sponsored by Renton Rotary, will be served at 11:45 a.m. Senior
citizens must pick up a free ticket prior to Tuesday, November 25th, for their meal reservation and
transportation request. For further information, please contact the Renton Senior Activity Center at 425430-
6633.
Renton's Parks look great because parks maintenance staff keep them clean and safe for public use by regularly
mowing, edging, weeding, monitoring park conditions, and providing immediate response to remedy problem
situations. The City follows an Integrated Pest Management approach that uses a variety of strategies to
prevent and control pest problems at parks in Renton. For details about this Integrated Pest Management
approach, visit the Spotlight section of the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us, pick up a brochure at City
Hall or the Renton Community Center, or call 425-430-6600.
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
• Due to. a conflict with some underground utilities, the Wastewater Utility has relocated the site for the
replacement for the East Valley Lift Station. The new location is along East Valley Road just north of S. 34th
Street. A deep side sewer must be installed across East Valley Road at this location. During this construction
this portion of East Valley Road will be reduced to one lane with flaggers. Signage will indicate that there
could be delays, and Lind Avenue is available as a detour route. The work will probably start on Wednesday,
November 120' or the following Monday, November 17"' and take five to ten work days.
• A difficult utility conflict on the NE 10th Street/Anacortes Avenue storm water project is currently being
evaluated. The conflict involves the new 12-inch drain line being installed in Anacortes Court and an existing
underground PSE power line in NE loth Street. Due to slope constraints and the existence of other utilities,
the drain line cannot be raised or lowered, and there is no slack in the buried PSE power lines to allow them to
be moved without a four to eight -hour power outage that would affect 300 residences and Hazen High School.
These residences are located both in Renton and in unincorporated King County. The work has been proposed
for Veteran's Day (November 110) because Hazen High School will be closed that day. PSE has posted 48-
hour advance notices of a temporary power outage to the residences. However, a meeting is to be held on
Monday, November 10"' with PSE to determine if this work can be done without a four to eight -hour power
outage. Possible options include PSE installing a back feed to reduce the duration of the power outage, doing
the work at night, or installation of a reverse siphon in the storm line to avoid having to move the underground
power lines. More information will be available at the time of the November 10`h Council meeting.
Administrative Report
November 10, 2003
Page 2
POLICE DEPARTMENT
• During the week of November 11-17, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the
following areas and, in addition, all school zones during school days:
Renton Police Department Traffic Enforcement Emphasis
November 11-17
Date
6:00 a.m. to Noon
Noon to 6:00 p.m.
All Da
Motorcycles/Cars
Motorcycles/Cars
Radar Trailer
November 11, Tuesday
SW Sunset Blvd (turns/speed)
400 blk, Cedar Ave S (speed)
1400 blk, Houser Way (speed)
Rainier Ave N (speed)
1900 blk, Redmond
Ave NE
November 12, Wednesday
1100 blk, Carr Rd (speed)
Maple Valle Hwy (speed)
400 blk, Cedar Ave S (speed)
2600 blk, NE 7'° St (speed)
3700 blk, Sunset
Blvd NE
November 13, Thursday
200 blk, S 2 nd St (speed/jaywalking)
3500 blk, Park Ave N (speed)
1900 blk, Union Ave NE (speed)
2700 blk, Benson Dr S (speed)
200 blk, S 2 nd St
November 14, Friday
700 blk, SW 43d St (speed)
Rainier Ave N (speed)
2700 blk, Benson Dr (speed)
City HalI/Benson Rd (lane change)
3700 blk, Sunset
Blvd NE
November 17, Monday
1100 blk, Carr Rd (speed)
Rainier Ave N (speed)
Rainier Ave N (speed)
1400 blk, Houser Wayspeed)
3200 blk, Park Ave N
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board... City Clerk
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
Bid opening on November 5, 2003, for CAG-03-154,
2003 Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Project
EXHIBITS:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tabulation Sheet (8 bids)
AI#: 15e6. 11
A OF: 11 / 10/2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent......... X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance.......
Resolution......
Old Business....
New Business....
Study Session...
Other...........
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Council concur Finance Dept....
Other...........
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... $116,070.25 Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted........ $165,000.00 Revenue Generated...
Total Project Budget ... City Share Total Project...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $133,325.20
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three
criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no
irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by R&J Landscape and
Construction in the amount of $116,070.25.
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 6, 2003
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
CC: Mike Stenhouse
Leslie Lahndt
James Wilhoit
Ryan Plut
FROM: Bill Wressell, X-7400
SUBJECT: 2003 Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Project
The Transportation Division recommends that the bid from R. and J. Landscape and
Construction be accepted and the contract for the subject project be awarded, in the
amount of $116,070.25. The total budget for the project is $165,000 and is funded by
The South 2nd and Williams Sidewalk Repair Program($140,000) and The CBD Bike and
Pedestrian Connections Program($25,000). The Engineer's estimate for the construction
of the 2003 Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Project, under this contract, is
$133,325.20.
If you have any additional questions or concerns please give me a call.
clerk]
t Title:
%TE:
Item
No.
2003 Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Project
November 05, 2003
William Wressel
Unit
Description
Est.
Quant'
City of Renton
Engineers Estimate
Unit Bid
Price Amount
R&J Landscape
and Construction
Unit Bid
Price Amount
Farrow Concrete
Specialties
Unit Bid
Price Amount
Kemper
Construction
Unit Bid
Price Amount
C.W. Williams
Constr. Co.
Unit Bid
Price Amount
Gary Merlino
Constr. Co.
Unit Bid
Price Amount
1
Mobilization
LS
1
16,000.00
16,000.00
12,000.00
12,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,500.00
8,500.00
6,860.00
6,860.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
2
Traffic control
LS
1
12,000.00
12,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
5,730.00
5,730.00
1,000.00
1,000.Ob
3
Saw Cutting 2' to 6' Concrete
LF
361
4.00
1,444.00
2.00
722.00
4.00
1,444.00
1.90
685.90
4.65
1,678.65
4.00
1,444.00
4
Saw Cutting 2' to 6' Asphalt
LF
1,291
3.00
3,873.00
2.00
2,582.00
4.00
5,164.00
1.50
1,936.50
1.85
2,388.35
2.00
2,582.00
5
Remove Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter
LF
1,234
3.00
3,702.00
5.00
6,170.00
3.00
3,702.00
8.00
9,872.00
7.20
8,884.80
10.00
12,340.00
6
Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk/Driveway
SY
1,341
10.00
13,410.00
11.25
15,086.25
10.00
13,410.00
14.50
19,444.50
7.25
9,722.25
15.00
20,115.00
7
Cement Concrete.Traffic Curb and Gutter
LF
1,234
14.00
17,276.00
19.00
23,446.00
12.00
14,808.00
24.50
30,233.00
18.00
22,212.00
28.00
34,552.00
8
Cement Concrete Sidewalk
SY
1,116
27.00
30,132.00
27.00
30,132.00
30.00
33,480.00
23.50
26,226.00
26.00
29,016.00
40.00
44,640.00
9
Cement Concrete Industrial Driveway
SY
55
55.00
3,025.00
40.00
2,200.00
60.00
3,300.00
71.00
3,905.00
30.00
1,650.00
55.00
3,025.00
10
Cement Concrete Curb Ramp Type'_"
EA
24
716.80
17,203.20
400.00
9,600.00
500.00
12,000.00
900.00
21,600.00
1,952.00
46,848.00
1,200.00
28,800.00
11
Crushed Surfacing Top Course
Ton
10
50.00
500.00
40.00
400.00
100.00
1,000.00
115.00
1,150.00
61.95
619.50
20.00
200.00
12
Asphalt Concrete Pavement Cl. B
Ton
48
120.00
5,760.00
109.00
5,232.00
100.00
4,800.00
100.00
4,800.00
170.85
8,200.80
140.00
6,720.00
13
Landscape/PropertyRestoration
LS
1
9,000.00
9,000.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,340.00
1,340.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
Subtotal
133,325.20
118,108.00
134,352.90
145,150.35
158,918.00
No Tax
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
133,325.20
116,070.25
118,108.00
134,352.90
145,150.35
158,918.00
Error in the final total of
five cents too high.
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: 2003 Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Project; CAG-03-154
)ATE: November 5, 2003
FORMS
BID
BIDDER
Bid
Triple
Bond
Form
C.W. Williams Const. Co.
X
X
$145,150.35
1220 S. 356th St. Ste. B-12
Federal Way, WA 98003
Chester W. Williams
Cutter, Inc.
X
X
$175,957.50
308 N. 62nd St.
Seattle, WA 98103-5549
Ron Farrell
Dennis R. Craig Const., Inc.
X
X
$173,895.90
PO Box 595
Redmond, WA 98073-0595
Janie Craig
Farrow Concrete Specialties, Inc.
check
X
$118,108.00
20521 Island Parkway E.
;umner, WA 98390
Daniel Farrow
Gary Merlino Const. Co., Inc.
X
X
$158,918.00
9125 - 10th Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98108
Brian J. Kittleson
Kemper Const. Corp.
X
X
$134,352.90
PO Box 332
Redmond, WA 98073
Sherrie L. Kemper
R&J Landscape & Const.
X
X
—$ffr,678.36
7318 44th Ave. NE #207
$116 , 070.25
Marysville, WA 98270
Rick St. Martin
R.W. Scott Const. Co.
X
X
$169,527.20
4005 W. Valley Hwy., Ste. A
Auburn, WA 98001
R.W. Scott
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
TOTAL: $133,325.20
LEGEND:
Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage *corrected
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
CRT-03-007; Court Case — Curtis McDaniel vs.
City of Renton; Renton Police Department; John Does 1 and 2
Renton Police Officers
EXHIBITS:
Summons and Complaint
Al11 #:
FOR AGENDA OF: 11/10/2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ......... XX
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance...
Resolution...
Old Business.......
New Business......
Study Session....
Other....
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted ........ Revenue Generated...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Summons and Complaint filed in King County Superior Court by Charles S. Hamilton, III, 600 Market
Place One, 2003 Western Ave., Seattle, 98121, representing Curtis McDaniel, alleging negligence,
false arrest and false imprisonment, and assault and battery in connection with his arrest by Renton
police officers on May 9, 2002.
1
2
3.
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CITY OF RENTON
NOV 0 5 2003
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
RECEI ED
In Aing Cnunfy ;UP;!c's p(fi;e
SEP 2 9 2003
f ,-
l3�lrfeistpe�Si:`is`47
rir-r (awl (!'nk I
DEBORAH FLECK
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
CURTIS MCDANIEL,
Plaintiff,
V.
CITY OF RENTON; THE RENTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOES 1 and 2
RENTON POLICE OFFICERS,
Defendants.
TO: THE CITY OF RENTON:
-2-3 74 04- l
SUMMONS
A lawsuit has been started against you in the above -entitled Court by Curtis
McDaniel, Plaintiff. Plaintiffs claims are stated in a written complaint, a copy of which is
served upon you with this Summons.
In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the Complaint by stating
your defense in writing, and serve a copy upon the undersigned attorney for the Plaintiff
within 20 days after the service of this Summons, excluding the day of service, or within 60
days after the service of this Summons if served outside the State of Washington, excluding
the day of service, or a default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A
default judgment is one where the Plaintiff is entitled to what he asks for because you have
not responded. If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned attorney, you are
entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered.
You may demand that the Plaintiff file this lawsuit with the court. If you do so, the
demand must be in writing and must be served upon the Plaintiff. Within 14 days after you
serve the demand, the Plaintiffs must file this lawsuit with the court, or the service on you of
this Summons and Complaint will be void.
e C Mayor
r
RASL Ma pa c4t m
SUMMONS - 1 � _Rita Ch(
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121-21
(206)623-6619
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly
so that your written response, if any, may be served on time.
This summons is issued pursuantrOO'3.
4`of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the
State of Washington.
Jr i
t DATED tl f Stembe
CHAiRLES S. HAMILTON, III, WSBA #5648
Attorney for Plaintiff
SUMMONS - 2
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 96121
(206) 623-6619
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RECEIVED
In Kiwi Counrq 'Superior Court Merit's ONO
SEP 2 9 2003
(Cshier Seddon
Superior Court Clerk
BIEUNRAH FUCK
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
0.-3'74 04M 1
CURTIS MCDANIEL,
Plaintiff,
V.
CITY OF RENTON; THE RENTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOES 1 and 2
RENTON POLICE OFFICERS,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
COME NOW Curtis McDaniel, plaintiff herein, by and through his attorney,
Charles S. Hamilton, III, and respectfully files his complaint for damages against the City
of Renton and officers of the Renton Police Department, in a manner as follows:
I. PARTIES
I.1 Curtis McDaniel, plaintiff, was at relevant times over the age of 18 years.
At relevant times she resided in King County, Washington.
I.2 The City of Renton, defendant, is a governmental entity capable of being
sued in the same manner as a private person. The City of Renton is responsible for the
behavior within the scope of the employ of the members of the Renton Police Department.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — 1
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121-21
(206) 623.6619
1
The City of Renton is responsible for the acts and omission of the as yet unnamed and
2
unidentified police officers whose acts and omissions are described below.
3
1.3. John Doe 1 was at all times a police officer of the Renton Police
4
5 Department. His acts and omissions herein were performed within the scope of his
6 employment.
7 1.4. John Doe 2 was at all times a police officer of the Renton Police
8 Department. His acts and omissions herein were performed within the scope of his
9 employment.
to II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
11 II.1 The Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter herein.
12 11.2 Venue of this action lies properly in King County, Washington, the site of
13 the alleged tortious acts in this action.
14
III. FACTS GIVING RISE TO LIABILITY
15
HL 1 On or about May 9, 2002, the plaintiff was present at a residence in Renton
16
located at 912 Glenwood Avenue, N.E., Renton, WA. Renton Police Officers had been
17
called to that area regarding an incident in which plaintiff was not involved- When
18
19 plaintiff arrived at the scene he was placed in handcuffs without explanation. When he
20 sought to contest his involvement in any criminal activity he was ignored by the
21 investigating police officers. When the officers continued to interrogate Mr. McDaniel and
22 his brother, present also, they exercised their constitutional right not to answer any further
23 questions. The claimant was then arrested by Renton Police officers based upon his
24 insistence that he did not need to speak further with the officers. One of the officers told
25
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121-215
(208) 623.6619
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - 2
1
a
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
plaintiff he was being arrested because he was irritating the officers, the police officer's
characterization. The plaintiff, who had committed no crime, was booked, fingerprinted
and held for further interrogation. He was not released for more than twelve hours.
III.2. The acts and omissions of the Renton police officers constituted the tort of
negligence.
111.3. The acts of the Renton's police officers constituted the torts of false arrest
and false imprisonment.
battery.
III.4. The acts of the Renton police officers constituted the tort of assault and
III.5 The acts and omissions of the defendants constituted violation of plaintiff's
First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights protected by the United States
Constitution and 42 USC Section 1983.
111.6. As a proximate result of the wrongful acts of defendants and the policies
and customs of the Renton Police Department, plaintiff suffered property damage, bodily
injury, loss of gnjoyment of life, pain and suffering, and damages generally in an amount
which will be demonstrated at time of trial.
III.7. The acts of the police officers was sufficiently egregious so as to warrant
imposition of punitive damages as provided by 42 USC Section 1983.
IV. WAIVER OF PATIENT -PHYSICIAN PRIVILEGE
Plaintiff hereby notes his intent to waive the physician -patient privilege insofar as
waiver is required by the terms of RCW 5.60.060(4)(b). The said waiver shall extend no
farther than is required by the said statute. The waiver shall take effect on the 89th day
following the filing of this lawsuit.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - 3
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON98121-21&
(206) 623.6619
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
1.0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, having fully set forth her claims against these defendants, plaintiff
respectfully prays for the following relief.
1. That a money judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff and against each and
all of these defendants in an amount which will fully and fairly compensate him for his
injuries and damages sustained herein;
2. That the Court award plaintiff all taxable costs and disbursement incurred
herein, including reasonable and statutory attorney's fees;
3. That plaintiff be awarded punitive damages pursuant to 42 USC Section
1983 and 1988;
4. That plaintiff be awarded reasonable attorneys fees as permitted by 42 USC
Section 1983 and 1988;
5. That the Court provide miff with such o r elief as it deems to be fair
and equitable in the circumstan es of the c e.
RESPECTFULLY S MITTED t s y of Smtembof,G2003.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - 4
CITARLES S. HA.MIL'
Attorney for plaintiff
, III, WSBA
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES S HAMILTON III
600 MARKET PLACE ONE
2003 WESTERN AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121
(206) 623-6619
I
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
No:�3'-2-3'74 04-1Eff
Plaintiff(s), ORDER SETTING CIVIL CASE SCHEDULE
vs. ASSIGNED JUDGE: DEBORAH FLECK
TRIAL DATE: Mon 2/28/05
Defendant(s). (-ORSCS)
On Mon 9129/03, a civil case has been filed in the King County Superior Court and will be managed by
the Case Schedule on Page 3 as ordered by the King County Superior Court Presiding Judge.
1. NOTICES
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF:
The Plaintiff may serve a copy of this Order Setting Case Schedule (Schedule) on the Defendant(s)
along with the Summons and Complaint/Petition. Otherwise, the Plaintiff shall serve the Schedule
on the Defendant(s) within 10 days after the later of: (1) the filing of the Summons and
Complaint/Petition or (2) service of the Defendant's first response to the Complaint/Petition, whether
that response is a Notice of Appearance, a response, or a Civil Rule 12 (CR 12) motion. The
Schedule may be served by regular mail, with proof of mailing to be filed promptly in the form required
by Civil Rule 5 (CR 5).
"1 understand that / am required to give a copy of these documents to all parties in this case."
Print Name
ORDER SETTING CIVIL CASE SCHEDULE
Sign Name
Revised June 2003
I. NOTICES (continued)
NOTICE TO.ALL PARTIES:
All attorneys and parties should make themselves familiar with the King County Local Rules [KCLRj --
especially those referred to in this Schedule. In order to comply with the Schedule, it will be
necessary for attorneys and parties to pursue their cases vigorously from the day the case is filed. For
example, discovery must be undertaken promptly in order to comply with the deadlines for joining
additional parties, claims, and defenses, for disclosing possible witnesses [See KCLR 26), and for
meeting the discovery cutoff date [See KCLR 37(g)).
SHOW CAUSE HEARINGS FOR CIVIL CASES [King County Local Rule 4(g)]
A Show Cause Hearing will be held before the assigned judge if the case is not at issue. The Order to
Show Cause will be mailed to all parties. The parties or counsel are required to attend. A
Confirmation of Joinder, Claims and Defenses must be filed by the deadline in the schedule.
PENDING DUE DATES CANCELED BY FILING PAPERS THAT RESOLVE THE CASE:
When a final decree, judgment, or order of dismissal of all parties and claims is filed with the Superior
Court Clerk's Office, and a courtesy copy delivered to the assigned judge, all pending due dates in this
Schedule are automatically canceled, including the scheduled Trial Date. It is the responsibility of the
parties to 1) file such dispositive documents within 45 days of the resolution of the case, and 2) strike
any pending motions by notifying the bailiff to the assigned judge.
Parties may also authorize the Superior Court to strike all pending due dates and the Trial Date by
filing a Notice of Settlement pursuant to KCLR 41, and forwarding a courtesy copy to the assigned
judge. If a final decree, judgment or order of dismissal of all parties and claims is not filed by 45 days
after a Notice of Settlement, the case may be dismissed with notice.
If you miss your scheduled Trial Date, the Superior Court Clerk is authorized by KCLR 41(b)(2)(A)
to present an Order of Dismissal, without notice, for failure to appear at the scheduled Trial Date.
NOTICES OF APPEARANCE OR WITHDRAWAL AND ADDRESS CHANGES:
All parties to this action must keep the court informed of their addresses. When a Notice of
Appearance/Withdrawal or Notice of Change of Address is filed with the Superior Court Clerk's Office,
parties must provide the assigned judge with a courtesy copy.
ARBITRATION FILING AND TRIAL DE NOVO POST ARBITRATION FEE:
A Statement of Arbitrability must be filed by the deadline on the schedule if the case is subject to
mandatory arbitration and is at issue. If mandatory arbitration is required after the deadline, parties
must obtain an order from the assigned judge transferring the case to arbitration. Any party filing a
Statement must pay a $220 arbitration fee (effective 10/1/2002). If a party seeks a trial de novo
when an arbitration award is appealed, a fee of $250 and the request for trial de novo must be filed
with the Clerk's Office Cashiers.
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE FEES:AII parties will be assessed a fee authorized by King County
Code 4.71.050 whenever the Superior Court Clerk must send notice of non-compliance of schedule
requirements and/or Local Rule 41.
ORDER SETTING CIVIL CASE SCHEDULE Revised June 2003
II. CASE SCHEDULE
CASE EVENT DEADLINE or EVENT DATE
Case Filed and Schedule Issued
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon 9/29/03
✓ Confirmation of Service [See KCLR 4.1]
----------------------------=----------------------------------------------------
Mon 10/27/03
✓ Last Day for Filing Statement of Arbitrability without a Showing of Good
------ ------
Mon 3/08/04
Cause for Late Filing.[See KCLMAR 2.1(a) and Notices on Page 2]
$220 arbitration fee must be paid
— OR[Gonsu/t Local Rules to determine which document applies for your case.]
Mon 3/08/04
✓ Confirmation of Joinder of Parties, Claims and Defenses [See KCLR
4.2(a)(2)]
NOTE. If Joinder" document applies to the case and is not tiled, the
parties may be required to appear at the Show Cause Hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEADLINE for Hearing Motions to Change Case Assignment Area [KCLR 82(e)]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon 3/22/04
DEADLINE for Disclosure of Possible Primary Witnesses [See KCLR 26(b)]
------------
Mon. 9/27/04
---------------
V Joint Pretrial Report [See attached order]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEADLINE for Disclosure of Possible Rebuttal Witnesses [See KCLR 26(c)] Mon 11/08/04
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✓ DEADLINE for Jury Demand [See KCLR 38(b)(2)] Mon 11/22/04
------------- --------------
DEADLINE for a Change in Trial Date [See KCLR 40(e)(2)] Mon 11/22/04
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEADLINE for Discovery Cutoff [See KCLR 37(g)] Mon 1/10/05
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEADLINE for Engaging in Alternative Dispute Resolution [See attached Order] Mon 1/31/05
------------- ---------------
DEADLINE: Exchange Witness & Exhibit Lists & Documentary Exhibits Mon 2/07/05
[KCLR 16(a)(3)]
-- -----------------------------------------
DEADLINE for Hearing Dispositive Pretrial Motions [See KCLR 56, CR 561 Mon 2/14/05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✓ Joint Statement of Evidence [See KCLR 16(a)(4)] Tue 2/22/05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trial Date [See KCLR 40] Mon 2/28/05
a
shown.
III. ORDER
Pursuant to King County Local Rule 4 [KCLR 4], IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the
schedule listed above. Penalties, including but not limited to sanctions set forth in Local Rule 4(g) and
Rule 37 of the Superior Court Civil Rules, may be imposed for non-compliance. It is FURTHER
ORDERED that the party filing this action must serve this Order etting Civil Case Schedule and
attachment on all other parties. �I �1 `& i _ 11 SV44-
�[ r
DATED: 9/29/2003 R cha, d D. Eddie
PRESIDING JUDGE
ORDER SETTING CIVIL CASE SCHEDULE Revised June 2003
IV. ORDER ON CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE
READ THIS ORDER PRIOR TO CONTACTING YOUR ASSIGNED JUDGE
This case is assigned to the Superior Court Judge whose name appears in the caption
of this Schedule: The assigned Superior Court Judge will preside over and manage this case
and will conduct trials, motions, and conferences in this matter until completion of all issues.
COMPLEX LITIGATION: If you anticipate an unusually complex or lengthy trial, please
notify the assigned court as soon as possible.
The following procedures hereafter apply to the processing of this case:
APPLICABLE RULES:
Except as specifically modified below, all the provisions of KCLR 4-26 shall apply to
the processing of civil cases before Superior Court Judges.
CASE SCHEDULE AND REQUIREMENTS:
A. Trial: Trial is confirmed for 9:00 a.m. on the date on the Schedule. The Friday
before trial, the assigned court wilt contact the parties to determine the status of
the case and inform the parties of any adjustments to the Trial Date.
B. Show Cause Hearing: A Show Cause Hearing will be held before the assigned
judge if the
case is not at issue. If the case is not at issue or in accordance with the attached
case schedule, all parties will receive and Order to Show Cause that will set a
specific date and time for the hearing. All parties and/or counsel are required to
attend.
C. `. Joint Pretrial Report: 120 days before the Trial Date, parties shalt prepare and
file,
with a copy to the assigned judge, a joint pretrial report setting forth`the nature
.of'the case, whether a jury demand has been filed, the expected duration of the
trial, the status of discovery, the need to amend pleadings or add parties, whether
V
y a`setttement conference has been scheduled, special problems, etc.
Plaintiff '.s%Petitioner's counsel is responsible for proposing and contacting the
other parties regarding said report.
D: Pretrial Conference: A pretrial conference will be scheduled by the assigned
judge.
g ApprgzimateOy.thirty (30) days before the conference, you will receive an Order
Setting Pretrial Conference that will set the specific date and time for the
conference^: -The conference will be held in the courtroom of the assigned judge,
ai)d'thef®ilowing_ nonexclusive list of matters wilt be addressed at that time:
1) Status of settlement discussions;
4 2) Jury trial --'selection and number of jurors;
'. • ' 3) - Potential evidentiary problems;
4) Potential motions in limine;
SEE NEXT PAGE
revised 5/29/2002
L: formskashiers/iv orders
5) Use of depositions;
6) Deadlines for nondispositive motions;
7) Procedures to be followed with respect to exhibits;
8) Witnesses -- identity, number, testimony;
9) Special needs (e.g. interpreters, equipment);
10) Trial submissions, such as briefs, Joint Statement of Evidence, jury
instructions,
voir dire questions, etc.
11) Receipt of Public Assistance Payments (Domestic Cases) -- If any party is on
public Assistance, notify the Prosecutor's Office of this proceeding now at 296-
9020.
E. _Settlement/Mediation/ADR:
1) 45 days before the Trial Date, counsel for plaintiff shall submit a written
settlement demand. Ten (10) days after receiving plaintiff's written
demand, counsel for defendant shall respond (with a counteroffer, if
appropriate).
2) 30 days before the Trial Date, a settlement/mediation/ADR conference
shalt have
been held. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS.
3) 20 days before the Trial Date, counsel for plaintiff shall advise the
assigned judge
of the progress of the settlement process.
MOTIONS PROCEDURES:
A. Noting of Motions
1) Dispositive Motions: All Summary Judgment or other motions that dispose
of the case in whole or in part will be heard with oral argument. before the
assigned judge. The moving party must arrange with the bailiff a date and
time for the hearing, consistent with the court rules.
2) Nondispositive Motions: These motions, which include discovery motions,
will be
ruled on by the assigned judge without oral argument, unless otherwise
ordered. All such motions must be noted for a date by which the ruling is
requested; this date must likewise conform to the applicable notice
requirements. Rather than noting a time of day, the Note for Motion
should state "Without Oral Argument."
SEE NEXT PAGE
revised 5/29/2002
L: forms/cashiershv orders
3) Motions in Family Law Cases: Discovery motions to compel, motions in
limine.,
motions relating to trial dates and motions to vacate judgments/dismissals
shall be brought before the assigned judge. All other motions should be
noted and heard on the Family Law Motions Calendar.
4) Emergency Motions: Emergency motions will be allowed only upon entry
of an Order
Shortening Time. However, emergency discovery disputes may be
addressed by telephone call and without written motion, if the judge
. approves.
B. Filine of Papers All original papers must be filed with the Clerk's Office on the
6th floor.
The working copies of all papers in support or opposition must be marked on the
upper right corner of the first page with the date of consideration or hearing and
the name of the assigned judge. The assigned judge's working copy must be
delivered to his/her courtroom or to the judges' mailroom. Do not file working
copies with the Motions Coordinator, except those motions to be heard on the
Family Law Motions Calendar, in which case the working copies should be filed
with the Family Law Motions Coordinator.
1) Original Proposed Order: Each of the parties must include in the working
copy materials submitted on any motion an original proposed order
sustaining his/her side of the argument. Should any party desire a copy of
the order as signed and filed by the judge, a preaddressed, stamped
envelope shall accompany the proposed order. .
2) Presentation of Orders: At( orders, agreed or otherwise, must be
presented to the
assigned judge. If that judge is absent, contact the assigned court for
further instructions. If another judge enters an order on the case, counsel
is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy.
Proposed orders finalizing settlement and/or dismissal by agreement of all parties
shalt be presented to the assigned judge or in the Ex Parte Department. Format
Proof in Family Law cases must be scheduled before the assigned judge by
contacting the bailiff,.or Formal Proof may be entered in the Ex Parte
Department. If final orders and/or Formal Proof are entered in the Ex Parte
Department, counsel is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy.
C. Form: Memoranda/briefs for matters heard by the assigned judge may not
exceed 24 pages
for dispositive motions and 12 pages for nondispositive motions, unless the
assigned judge permits over -length memoranda/briefs in advance of filing. Over -
length memoranda/briefs and motions supported by such memoranda/briefs may
be stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN
DISMISSAL OR OTHER. SANCTIONS. PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER SHALL FORWARD A COPY OF THIS
ORDER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE TO ANY PARTY WHO HAS NOT RECEIVED THIS ORDER.
JUDGE
revised 5/29/2002
L: forms/cashiershv orders
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
[TIT 5 „C
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of: November 10, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with
Correspondence..
City of Renton code for new short plats.
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Deed of Dedication
Study Sessions......
Exhibit Map
Vicinity Map
Information.........
Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
Recommended Action:
Approvals:
Council concur.
Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other. ..............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required...
Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted.......
Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget
City Share Total Project.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way
is a 15-foot corner radius at the intersection of
Meadow Avenue N and N 24`h Street. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the
Reed Short Plat, LUA-03-062, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed
prior to recording deed with the short plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of
Dedication.
IAP1anReview\C0LS0N\Shortp1ats 2003\ReedSHPL 03 AGNBILL.doc
Return Address:
City Cleric's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055-3232
DEED OF DEDICATION
project File #:WA-o3-O(o2, S14PL- A
wrlk -1-1 of rinr.„ments assigned or m;
Property Tax Parcel Number: e5 Z -3e S' ` &-2 C`t
Street Intersection: Ne 21"t- r,AAEAtorc►
)nal reference numbers ate on page
Grantor(s): -- Grantee(s):
1. Ti t ev y is PArRi r:;A Rya 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or, full legal must go here. Additional legal on page )
PeK jam of .4E T )3 , e.; ITy OF TwAv7'L+V 15/fmR7"
�ZEGaK� En z t �, D�TR kc:wn B $/C 3.nj 9e e.17; AlAre, �triatES'
jy/ Ax-k ro,-j , Sc=C 5, T Z 3Al , ;Z �,E, y✓ A/t.
(5�� ,Q7TfFe.Id�D T'e'R Fa4� LAe. Esc=R1
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits convoys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantees) as
named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. This dedication is
required as a condition for development of property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Annroved and Accepted By:
Gr�ant�o'r�(s): -
INDIVIDUAL FORM OF
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Notary seas must be within box
Grantee(s): City of Renton
Mayor
City Clerk
STATE OF ) SS
COUNTY OF KfM fWO ►w*h
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Q �.t d signed this insummt and
w e ge r to be hislhedtheir free and voluntary ad for the uses and purposes
vrrMAM. th instrument.
DIANA V. EMH�Pk9'
NOTARY PUBLIC . 33175 7
COMMISSION N0
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.
Drury tc in and for the State of *WbhVt 11- OR EGY
Notary (Print) j)iAALk V. 6M86ALf�NO
My appointment expires:_ �d
Dated: 10-15-03
Page I
DEED.DOC
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND THAT IS A PART OF LOT B OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 118-80, RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING N0. 8103039007, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ALSO BEING A
PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID TRACT
OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT B, THENCE N88'18'45"W ALONG THE SOUTH
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B 15.30 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE RADIUS
OF WHICH BEARS NO1'41'15'E, 15.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 91'07'30' FOR 23.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 8,
THENCE S00'33'45W ALONG SAID EAST BOUNDARY 15.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.,
IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
60 I I
Los Y 3g00q
�o ll�
R-M00'
L-2186' 0
a-aro7*30' I
AREA fO 6E DEWATw
fO THE afY OF REWM
aw COUW RM as
4.SE
CORNER
N. 24TH STREET N. e
--g _
SCALE.1 ' = JO'
EXHIBIT PREPARED FOR: TIMOTHY do PAMIC14 REED Ca D. C�
C4 1f
C Q CRONES & ASSOC, x
_N_ N
� A LAND SURVEYORS
OVAL LL
AB
23806 1907H AVEE. SKEW,, WA 98042 (425) 432-5930 DMM- 6/27/05
SHEET 1 OF 1 10/09/03
a.
10
1. StAr.
30
UA
40
4)
44
Af M
27
AW93
JO 35
d J.",
Z 210
k 337 too
We
338
70
339
N r404 b,&W M
U)
2
lk
Carr; r
REPORT
City of Renton
of Planning / Building / Public Works
&Depa►tment
DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A.
SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
REPORT DATE:
July 14, 2003
Project Name
Reed Short Plat
Owner/Contact
Timothy & Patricia Reed
1627 NE Stanton
Portland, OR 97212
Contact
Jim Hanson
Hanson Consulting
17446 Mallard Cove Lane
ML Vernon, WA 98274
File Number
LUA-03-062, SHPL-A
Project Managers
Jason E. Jordan
Kristina Catlin
Project Description
Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for the two -lot subdivision of a 0.26-
acre site located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Unit Per Acre (R-8) Zone. The subject site
is currently developed with a single-family dwelling that the applicant proposes to demolish.
Both lots are intended for the future construction of single-family residences. Access to the
proposed short plat would be provided frpm Meadow Avenue North.
Project Location
2407 Meadow Avenue North
Project Location Map shplptdoc
City of,Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 2
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Owners of Record. Timothy & Patricia Reed
1627 NE Stanton
Portland, OR 97212
ZZoning Designation: Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8)
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF)
4-Existing Site Use: The site currently contains an approximately 1,500 square foot single-family
dwelling that will be demolished.
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
North: Single -Family Residential (R-8 zone)
East: Meadow Avenue North
South: North 24'" Street
West. Single -Family Residential (R-8 zone)
6.Access: Both lots would have access to Meadow Avenue North.
7.Site Area: 11,342 square feet / 0.26 acre
C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/1995
Zoning N/A 4404 6/7/1993
Annexation N/A 1804 12/8/1959
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
Water. There is an existing 16-inch water main in Meadow Avenue North.
Sewer. There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer main in Meadow Avenue North and in North 20
Street
Surface Water/Storm Water: There are no existing storm facilities in Meadow Avenue North or
North 24' Street
2. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards.
2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations
Section 4-3-050: Critical Area Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards
6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria -
shplbpt doc
City of Renton,PB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 3
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family
2. Housing Element
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Background
The subject property is located on the comer of Meadow Avenue North and North 20 Street The applicant
has proposed to subdivide a 0.26-acre parcel into two lots. The property currently contains an approximately
1,500 square foot single-family residence that will be demolished. Both lots are intended for the eventual
development of detached single-family homes.
The lots are proposed at the following sizes: 5,000 square feet (Lot 1) and 6,342 square feet (Lot 2). Lot 1
would be considered an interior lot; Lot 2 would be considered a comer lot The applicant is proposing to serve
both lots from Meadow Avenue North.
The topography of the subject site slopes gently from east to west (approximately 8% slope). The subject site
is predominately vegetated with grass lawn. There are 2 coniferous trees and 1 deciduous tree on the
property; no tree removal is planned. No critical areas were found at the subject site during the review of this
application.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or critical areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
N/A
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address
issues raised by the proposed development These comments are contained in the official file, and the
essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Findings
and Conclusion at the end of the report
5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to
assist decision -makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation
The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single-family neighborhoods. The
proposal is consistent with the RSF designation because it allows for the future construction of new
single-family homes and promote infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following
Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies:
Policy LU-35. A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single-family
residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project review.
The applicant has proposed two lots that range in size from 5,000 square feet to 6,342 square feet
Policy LU-36. Allow developments at 9.7 dwelling units per acre on infill parcels of one-half acre
or less as an incentive to encourage single family small lot development.
The net density of the proposed subdivision, 7.69 dwelling units per acre, is within the density
range prescribed.
Policy H-4. Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity.
The proposal would create one additional residential lot, thereby increasing density within a
currently developed residential area.
shplhpt.doc
City of,Renton R/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED Juy 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 4
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton
Zoning Map. The proposed development would divide an existing lot into two lots and allow for the
future construction of two new single-family dwelling units.
The R-8 zone allows densities ranging from a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units
per net acre for lots one-half gross acre or less in size. Net density is calculated by deducting
sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way, and private easements serving three or
more lots from the gross acreage of the site. The subject property does not contain any sensitive
areas, areas required for right-of-way dedication, or private drives serving more than three lots.
Therefore, the net site area of the property is the same as the gross area (11,342 square feet or
0.26 acres). The division of the existing lot into two lots results in a net density of 7.69 dwelling
units per acre (2 lots/ 0.26 acre = 7.69 du/ac), which is within the allowed density range of the R-8
zone.
The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet, whichever is
greater, for lots over 5,000 square feet in size; lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed up to 50
percent lot coverage. Staff will verify that all development meets lot coverage restrictions at the
time of building permit submittal.
Setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: 20-foot front yard, 5-foot side yard, 15-foot side yard
along a street, and 20-foot rear yard. The Board of Public Works placed a condition on the
property requiring a 21-foot side yard along North 20 Street for the south property line of Lot 2.
While no building construction is proposed at this time, the lots appear to have adequate area to
facilitate new single-family residences that meet the required setbacks. In addition, each lot
appears to have adequate area to provide two off-street parking spaces as required by the parking
regulations. Staff will verify compliance with setbacks and parking requirements at the time of
building permit submittal.
c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat
The Subdivision Regulations require the installation of full street improvements, including curb,
gutter, 6-foot sidewalk, and half -street pavement along the site's subject streets (RMC section 4-6-
060), unless previously installed or waived or deferred through the City of Renton Board of Public
Works. As there are no curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements fronting the site along Meadow
Avenue North or North 2e Street, the applicant requested deferral of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
storm water improvements and a waiver for a 10-foot Right -of -Way dedication from the City's
Board of Pubic Works. The waiver and deferral were granted on April 9, 2003, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicant agrees to participate in any future Improvement District (LID) to provide curb, gutter,
sidewalks and storm water drainage.
2. A Restrictive Covenant shall be recorded prior to recording of the short plat, but not to exceed
(2) two years from the Board of Public Works decision.
3. The applicant agrees to allow a 6-foot sidewalk easement along North 20 Street
4. A 21-foot side yard setback from North 20 Street for Lot 2 shall be required.
The proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In
order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on
the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily
trip attributed to the project The additional lot is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new
average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57
trips x 1 lot = $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat
shplfrpt doc
City of Renton.PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 6
Lots: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet The short plat would
create two lots, both of which meet the lot size standards of the R-8 zone. As proposed, Lot 1
would be approximately 5,000 square feet and Lot 2 would be approximately 6,342 square feet.
The proposed lots also comply with the R-8 requirements for minimum lot width (60 feet for comer
lots; 50 feet for interior lots) and minimum lot depth (65 feet). Lot 1 (interior lot) is 50 feet wide and
Lot 2 (comer lot) is 63.18 feet wide. Both lots are 100 feet deep. In regards to setbacks, lot
coverage, and parking requirements, each of the proposed lots appears to have adequate building
area for the construction of a single-family residence. Compliance with these requirements would
be verified at building permit submittal.
The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements
of the Subdivision Regulations and development standards of the R-8 zone. Both of the proposed
lots are rectangular with property lines intersecting Meadow Avenue North at right angles.
co Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to Meadow Avenue North.
Topography: The topography of the subject site slopes gently from east to west (approximately
8% slope). The subject site is predominately vegetated with grass lawn. There are 2 coniferous
trees and 1 deciduous tree on the property. The applicant has indicated that no tree removal is
planned.
Due to the moderate slope (approximately 8%) on site, potential erosion impacts may occur during
project construction. Therefore, staff recommends the following two erosion control measures as
conditions of project approval: 1)The applicant shall install a construction fence and sift fence
along the down slope perimeter of the site. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and
grading is initiated. 2) The applicant's contractor shall perform daily inspections of the erosion
control system and provide any recommendations regarding modification or redesign to the
inspector of record. These conditions would ensure that neighboring properties would be
protected from erosion impacts generated from the proposal.
Relationship to Existing Uses. The properties surrounding the subject parcel are zoned
Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8). The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and Development Standards, which encourage residential infill development Moreover, as
future redevelopment occurs in this area of the city, many of the nearby lots are likely to be platted
into smaller infill lots ranging from 4,500 square feet to 6,500 square feet in size.
e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (rimeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code
required improvements and mitigation fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new
single-family lot, is recommended as a condition of short plat approval to mitigate the potential
impacts of the proposal on City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488 x 1 lot
= $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat
Recreation: The proposal does not provide on -site recreation areas for future residents of the
proposed short plat A Park Mitigation Fee, based on $530.76 per new single-family lot, is
recommended as a condition of short plat approval to offset the additional demand on existing park
facilities generated from this development This fee would contribute to the creation of new trails
and facilities that may be utilized by future residents. The fee is estimated at $530.76 ($530.76 x 1
lot = $530.76) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat
Schools. According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students
per single-family residential dwelling. It is anticipated that the proposed short plat would result in
0.44 (0.44 X 1lot = 0.44) new children to the local schools (Kennydale Elementary School,
McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School). The Renton School District has indicated they
can accommodate the additional student generated by this proposal.
shp&Wdoc
City of.Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 6
Streets: The subject site is located adjacent to Meadow Avenue North and North 20 Street.
Each of the proposed lots has direct access to Meadow Avenue North. No additional streets are
required as part of this proposal. Nevertheless, the applicant would be required to pay a Traffic
Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75.00 per each new trip generated by the proposal prior to the
recording of the short plat. Please see above discussion regarding "Streets" and "Access."
Storm Water. There are no storm water facilities adjacent to the subject site within Meadow
Avenue North or North 2e Street The Board of Public works granted the applicant a deferral for
storm water improvements. The applicant must submit a narrative addressing the collection of
roof runoff prior to issuance of the construction permit A Surface Water System Development
Charge of $525.00 for the new single-family lot will be collected as part of the construction permit
prior to the recording of the short plat
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: There is an existing 16-inch water main in Meadow Avenue
North and. 8-inch sewer mains in Meadow Avenue North and North 24"' Street The applicant
would be required to make all necessary connections to serve the future development The
applicant must install individual water meters for each lot prior to recording of the short plat A
Water System Development Charge of $1,105, and a Sewer System Development Charge of
$760.00 would be collected for each new single-family lot as part of the construction permit or prior
to the recording of the short plat The subject site is located in the Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2.
H. Findings:
1. Request. The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Reed Short Plat, File
No. LUA-03-062, SHPL-A
Z Application: The applicants short plat application complies with the requirements for information for
short plat review. The applicants short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official
land use file.
3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Residential
Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
4. Zoning. As presented, the proposal complies with the zoning requirements and development of the
Residential - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied
with.
5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's
Subdivision Regulations for the short platting of two lots, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval
are complied with.
6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Single -Family
Residential (zoned R-8); East: Meadow Avenue North; South: N 24'" Street; and West: Single -Family
Residential (zoned R-8).
7. Board of Public Works Conditions: A Restrictive Covenant must be recorded agreeing to participate
in any future Improvement District LID) to provide curb, gutter, sidewalks and storm water drainage. A 6-foot
sidewalk easement along North 24 Street and an additional 15-foot no build area adjacent to the sidewalk
easement must be recorded prior to final short plat approval.
8. Public Improvements: Water meters must be installed for each lot prior to short plat recording.
1. Conclusion:
1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan land use
designation and complies with the goals and policies of this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) zone and complies with
the zoning and development standards of this zone, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are
complied with.
3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City Code
and state law, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
shpibpt doc
City pf Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A Page 7
J. DECISION:
The Reed Short Plat, File No. LUA-03-062, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new average
daily trip associated with the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee of $717.75 shall be paid prior to the
recording of the short plat.
2. The applicant shall install a construction fence and silt fence along the down slope perimeter of the site. The silt
fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated and throughout all off -site and on -site improvements
as well as building construction.
3. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single-family lot. The Fire
Mitigation Fee of $488.00 shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat.
4. The applicant shall pay the required Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $530.76 per new single-family lot. The
Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat.
5. The applicant shall remove or demolish the existing house and final the demolition permit prior to short plat
recording.
6. The dedication of property for street purposes (the corner fillet) must be approved by the City Council prior to
short plat recording.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
Is
July 1J , 2003
'I'O"Will
Gregg A.Yi�elKap, / /P dministrator decision date
shp/trpt. doc
City of Renton.P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-062, SHPL-A
Page 8
ALUVIJUK r NU 1 t5 7 U APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action.
Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions
Planning
1. Lot 2 is subject to a 21-foot setback from North 24t' Street.
2. To comply with the Board of Public Works conditions, a 6-foot sidewalk easement along North 20 Street and an
additional 15-foot no build area adjacent to the sidewalk easement must be recorded prior to final short plat
approval.
3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground
cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will
occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the
current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be
proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's
approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit
Property Services -Comments for Final Short Plat Submittal
1. See attached memo from Sonja Fesser dated July 11, 2003.
Fire Prevention
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area (including attached garage), the minimum fire flow increases to
1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures.
2; The hydrant will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Stortz fitting.
1. The. Surface Water System Development Charge will be $525 for the new single-family residence. The
Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit prior to the recording of the short plat
2. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project
3. Applicant shall install a sift fence along the down slope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The sift fence
shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the
specifications presented in of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the
^, construction of both off -site and on -site improvements as well as building construction.
1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge will be $760 for the new single-family residence. The Development
Charges are collected as part of the construction permit prior to the recording of the short plat
2. Dual side sewers are not allowed. Separate sewer stubs must be provided to each lot prior to recording of the
short plat Minimum slope. shall be 2%.
1. Water System Development Charge for the new single family home is $1,105.00. The Development Charges are
collected as part of the construction permit prior to the recording of the short plat
2. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat
1. To comply with the Board of Public Works conditions, a Restrictive Covenant must be recorded agreeing to
participate in any future Improvement District (LID) to provide curb, gutter, sidewalks and storm water drainage.
2. Maximum driveway slope is 15 percent
3. Applicant will be required to comply with the City of Renton Trench Restoration and Street Overlay Requirements.
Plan Review — General
1. Separate permits for the side sewer and water meter will be required
2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities.
3. All new rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will required a separate building permit
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more
poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed
shp&pt.doc
City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 14, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-06Z SHPL-A Page 9
TRANSMITTED this le day of July, 2003 to the OwnedContact.
Timothy & Patricia Reed
1627 NE Stanton
Portland, OR 97212
Jim Hanson
17446 Mallard Cove Lane
Mt. Vernon, WA 98274
TRANSMITTED this 140' day of July, 2003 to the following:
Lamy Melding, Building Official
L. Rude, Fire Marshal
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner
Kayren Kittrick, Engineering Supervisor
Jan Conklin, Development Services Representative
Carrie Olson -Davis, Office Assistant III
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
South County Journal
Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of
decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that the Administrator
reopen a decision on a short plat. The Administrator may modify the decision if material evidence not readily
discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if it is found that there was misrepresentation of fact After review
of the reconsideration. request, if the Administrator finds Insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be
no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the
following appeal timeframe.
APPEAL This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or
before 5:00 PM on July 28, 2003. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed
in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton, WA 98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be
requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M.
shpltrpt doc
CITY 0 z' RENTON CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ACTION NO 'lA=-SHPL-H RECORDING NO.
CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NO. i—__—___
THAT PORTION OF NW 1/4, NE 1/4, SECTION 05, TOWNSHIP. 23 NORTH, RANGE 05 EAST, W.M.
`NW caTNEq of SEC, S-ZJ-s
FOUND COMA MON IN CISE
W, 1, NSRED JUNI,
COY OF REM KR
NORRONTµ N0, leas Co. .
LEGEND:
UUUFOUND SECTION CORNER MONUMENT AS SMOWN
00M FOUND 1/4 CORNER MONUMENT AS SHOWN
• SET 5/8. RM4R AND CAP LS 205J7
SET RAM AWL
URLNY PoLE
Lb WATER VA W
® WATER METER
A rxr NYORWT
0. DEGOUOUS TREE
* CONFEROUS TREE
(P) PUT OF N AJANY LAKE WASM04TON OAROCN
OF EDEN ADORION &KS101! f ML I,, PC.a=
Opt) MAY "ENT RENTON SNORT PUT NG, 017-0
REM NO, 6006,am,
(SP2) JACK RINO REMON SNORT PUT No. 014-80
REM NO, am fe500J
(SPJ) RER NAMS O. a RENTON SHORT PUT
(c) CALCULATED
(M) MEASURED
LWl OF TNr NW 1/4 OF sEM 9-7J-! --
iaJaao7c) -- -
ADDITION
vm., fi, f'C,. &fi
LOT A
t-ii0iiT PLA T z
I'll. $!:::?ii:iiii:f::%
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
3 inch . 20 !L
Ze,Lzae• )
�eJl,a•M) —_ !b°Auia°F'wYver�°tviasv>)
u
iDMoo7e) a
CORNQ OF
`a' ?3• wsffro JWE 2w. GN of
KKR pAC/L/NORIm" CONTROL Mw, I<^
I a �
i •�
— Ne ao�c •�� "I`�
RCS'
SNORT
U
'V
�Q$
42<
To er OtauTEo � a`�
Tn an OF R[NTOR ® I
O m
S. 1/I OORNER OF S[M l-ZJ-.L
(AGT�NSITEA) ttOKR CREEK
s
s
THAT PORTION OF NW 1/4, NE 1/4, SECTION 05, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 05 EAST. W.M.
L
�(pye
g
AL LL1N
Q
IMM
JUM 2, 200J
OWN. BY DATE
AILS AUY. 200J
CNKO. BY SCALE
BGW 1 "-20'
JOB NO.
REEDI 2ALDWC
SHEET
2 OF 2
C4 - 32 T24N ME W 1/2
R-S
Rl
iM 1 F
N 2,18 S.
I
B.
-:B
J ------
R-
f
R-1 R-1
,` ` `�� `�
pie 1E---"�
�
3
—_--- — — � RM-1
�
9D
-T-
i
d
Rm-i
z
- - - - - - - t
RM-i i
RC
11 A-1
MNGrON
— — — — — — — --
1A
Co
RM-1
cu I.
R-1(P)l
[E
Ix I
C O R
90zY 1
E4 8 T23N R5E W 112
ZONING ----
D 4
P/aw ISCMUCIAL SMVKM
olmm
5
T23N R5E W 1/2
"MI
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: EDNSP
Department/Neighborhoods &
Strategic Planning Division
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (6581)
Subject:
Public Hearing date for future zoning and adoption of
the Falk annexation recently approved by its residents
using the Election Method of Annexation and certified
by King County Records, Elections & Licensing
Exhibits:
Notice from King County Records, Elections and
Licensing Services Division on the results of this special
election to annex, assumption of fair share of City's
indebtedness, and accept City zoning.
Ordinance
Recommended Action:
Council Concur.
Al #: 5. (,
For Agenda of:
November loth, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent..............X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence -
Ordinance ............ X
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information .........
Approvals:
Legal Dept ......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
KI
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Establish public hearing date for November 24th, 2003 to further consider prezoning for the Falk
Annexation as well as the annexation ordinance itself. Having been approved by its residents in a
special election on September 16, 2003 a second public hearing on the recommended prezoning
for the Falk Annexation is required.
The requested action is to initiate this process by setting a public hearing date to further consider
prezoning for the Falk Annexation and conduct the first reading of the annexation ordinance for
it.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Schedule November 24th, 2003 for the second public hearing on prezoning for the Falk
Annexation as well as to hear the annexation ordinance for it.
Rentonnedagnbill/ bh
King County
Department of Executive Services
Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division
King County Administration Building, MS: ADM-ES-0553
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 553
Seattle, WA 98104-2337
206-296-1540 FAX 206-296-0108 TTY Relay 711
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS.
COUNTY OF KING )
CITY OF RENTi:' N
OCT 3 4 2003
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
This is to certify that on September 16, 2003, there was held a Special Election in conjunction
with the Primary, in the Proposed Falk Annexation Area, King County, Washington, for the
submission of three propositions to the voters for their approval or rejection.
That the results of the election were, duly canvassed by the King County Canvassing Board of
Election Returns on September 26, 2003, and the results of said canvass are as follows:
PROPOSED FALK ANNEXATION
PROPOSITION NO. 1
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE AREA
KNOWN AS THE FALK PROPERTY TO THE
CITY OF RENTON
FOR ANNEXATION 4 100% PASSED
AGAINST ANNEXATION 0 0%
VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
Proposition No. 1 required a simple majority for passage. Having received a 100% affirmative
vote, the measure was carried.
I
Proposed Falk Annexation
Page 2
PROPOSITION NO.2
ASSUMPTION OF
INDEBTEDNESS
YES 4 100% PASSED
NO 0 0%
VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
Proposition No. 2 required a super majority plus a minimum turnout and a minimum Yes vote.
Having received a 100% affirmative vote and satisfying the turnout and minimum Yes vote
requirements, the measure was carried.
PROPOSITION NO.3
PROPOSED ZONING REGULATION
FOR ADOPTION 4 100% PASSED
AGAINST ADOPTION 0 0%
VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
Proposition No. 3 required a simple majority for passage. Having received a 100% affirmative
vote, the measure was carried.
Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 26t' day of September 2003.
bulp� ��
Dean C. Logan, Direc o designee
9 Y&
King County
Department of Executive Services
Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division
Elections Section
PRIMARY AND SPECIAL ELECTION
SEPTEMBER 16, 2003
CITY OF RE--N-1101IN
O C T 1 4 2003
RECEIVED
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION of the AREA KNOWN AS FALK to the
CITY OF RENTON
There are 6 registered voters in the annexation area. Five are absentee voters and one is a poll
voter. Four absentee voters voted their ballots for the September 16, 2003 Special election and one
did not. The one eligible poll voter did voter his/her ballot.
The. first election results at 8:15 p.m. on 9/16/03 represented absentee ballot voters only. The
results were as follows:
Proposition No. 1 — Should the area known as Falk annex to the city of Renton?
For Annexation - 4
Against Annexation - 0
Proposition No. 2 — Assumption of Indebtedness
Yes - 4
No 0
Proposition No. 3 — Proposed Zoning Regulation
For Adoption - 4
Against Adoption - 0
The election results at 8:49 p.m. on 9/16/03 were from the polls. The results were as follows:
Proposition No. 1— Should the area known as Falk annex to the city of Renton?
For Annexation - 8
Against Annexation - 6
Proposition No. 2 — Assumption of Indebtedness
Yes - 9
No 5
Proposition No. 3 — Proposed Zoning Regulation
For Adoption - 10
Against Adoption - 4
Primary Offid-ii-AIFFiffi-aff
BALES ANNEXATION
Ballots Cast/Registered Voters.'
4/9
Ce 'al Precincts,
Proposition No. I Bales Annex To Renton 0-0. 020-5-1
FOR ANNEXATION'
4 loo.000/.
AGAINST ANNEXATION 4_ 100.00%
Proposition '2 �� ��0/0
0 0.00%
No: 2 Assumption OfIndebtedness
YES
NO
4 100.00%
PrOPOSWOn No. 3 Proposed ZoningRegulation
0 0.00%
FOR ADOPTION
AGAINST ADOPTION
rxjw-m -'UNINEAATION
Ballots CaW&RWered Voters: 151
2 50.00%
2 50-00 0
250,00%
Proposition No. I FalkAnnex To Renton j 100,00%
"OR ANNEXATION
tGAINST ANNEXATION
Proposition No, 2 42,86%
Assu?�Pfion OfIndebtedness
eS
D 64.29%
0 76— 35.71
Proposed Zoninggu
Proposition No. 3 Reiatio n
A ADOPTION
'A . INSTADOPTION 71.43%
0
28�47%o
COUNTY
mber' 16, 2003 . 9125103 3:19:23 PM
-Pagellofil
MICO ANNEXATION
Ballots Cast/Registered Voters.
Precincts CountePrecincts
2/ 3
I' , . 66.67%
Proposition No. I TydicoAnnex
To Renton
FOR ANNEXATION
AGAINST ANNEXATION —.--2 10.0,00%
Proposition No. 2 Assumition of -Indebtedness 0 0.00%
Yes
No 2 100,00%.
Proposition No. 3 Proposed Zoning Regulation 0 0.00%
FOR ADOPTION
AGAINST ADOPTION 100.00%
------
0 0 0.00%
Cp 0
t-ri Fri o
0 -n
t7i
MI
-n CIO
rn
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
ANNEXING CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY KNOWN
AS THE FALK ANNEXATION, BY THE ELECTION METHOD, AND
SETTING THE TAXATION RATE, ESTABLISHING ZONING
CLASSIFICATIONS, AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
ANNEXATION.
WHEREAS, after public hearing, the City Council enacted a resolution calling for an
annexation by election under RCW 35A.14.015 for an area commonly referred to as the Falk
Annexation, which area is the property generally bounded by the existing City boundaries to the
north boundary (the southern edge of South 47th Street) and west, the northern edge of SE 185th
Place, if extended, to the south, and the eastern edge of 102nd Avenue SE to the east, legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and
WHEREAS, said resolution also called for an election on a proposition that the property
in the Falk Annexation should be subject to existing bonded indebtedness; and
WHEREAS, said resolution also called for an election on the proposition that all
property located within the territory to be annexed, excluding street right-of-ways, shall,
simultaneous with the annexation, and have imposed City of Renton zoning regulations, with a
Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RS) and a zoning designation of
R-8; and
WHEREAS, said proposed annexation had been submitted to and approved by the King
County Boundary Review Board; and
WHEREAS, an election was held pursuant to State statute; and
, ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, in the September 16, 2003, election for the Falk Annexation, the
assumption of indebtedness, and the zoning regulations were approved by the voters; and
WHEREAS, the election results certifying a sufficient majority to permit annexation of
the area have been received by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. There has been filed with the City Council of the City of Renton,
Washington, certified election results indicating a sufficient majority was received approving the
Falk Annexation to the City of Renton and such annexation has been approved by the King
County Boundary Review Board. The City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Renton to annex and does hereby annex the territory submitted to the
voters as the Falk Annexation situated in King County, Washington, as contiguous, proximate
and adjacent to the present corporate limits of the City and as more particularly described by its
legal description as set forth in Exhibit A and graphically shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto
and incorporated in full by this reference.
SECTION II. The territory set forth in this ordinance and for which said election
results were certified for annexation should be and is hereby made a part of the City of Renton.
The area shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate on the same basis as property within the
City of Renton to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton,
which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or
existing at, the date of annexation.
SECTION III. Zoning for the annexed area is hereby designated as R-8, with a
Comprehensive Plan designation of RS (Residential Single Family).
0
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION IV. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated
to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five days after its
passage, approval, and publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1051:10/7/03:ma
day of , 2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
, 2003.
3
f
MEMEM
xr"0 xzf.-
1 N OM
x
x�
ash
7
xv�
Ik Annexation l 300 600
Exhibit H: Topography 1:3 600
v��Y 0 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1 m Interval Contours
..• Alex Pietsch, acting Administrator fff• ff� Existing Corporate Boundary
G. Del Rosario
�AraTo 19Dm mberz002 Proposed Annexation Boundary
2
I
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.,
Staff Contact......
EDNSP
Rebecca Lind (x6588)
Subject:
Pre -application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2004 Review Cycle: 2904 Maple Valley Highway
(Jones Rezone) Land Use Map Amendment
Exhibits:
1. Pre -application for approximately 0.2 acres of R-10
zoned property on Maple Valley Highway
2. Issue Paper
Al #:
For Agenda of. November 10, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Planning & Development Committee Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
One application was received for the 2004 Comprehensive Plan pre -application review process.
The request is to refer these applications to the Planning and Development Committee to begin
the review process. After Committee review, if the application meets review criteria, it will be
forwarded to the Planning Commission.
Staff analysis will be prepared for the Planning & Development Committee agenda.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend consideration of this land use application as part of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment cycle.
X
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PRE -APPLICATION #1-
2904 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY (JONES REZONE) LAND USE MAP
AMENDMENT
DESCRIPTION:
The proposal would amend Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for a 0.2 acre site at 2904
Maple Valley Highway just west of the intersection fo SE 5`h Street and Maple Valley Highway. The
site is currently designated Residential Options (RO) and zoned Residential-10 (R-10). The applicant
is proposing to redesignate the site Convenience Commercial (CC) with a concurrent rezone to
Convenience Commercial (CC). The intent appears to be to convert the existing structures on site to
commercial use such as offices, mini -mart, coffee shop, eating establishment, repair service,
laundromat, or drive -through retail. The subject site has a history as a gasoline station prior to having
the existing house placed on the site. Zoning on the site was B-1, Commercial until the current
Comprehensive Plan was developed in 1994, when the site became RO with R-10 zoning.
ISSUE SUMMARY:
• Whether the 0.2 acre 2904 Maple Valley Highway site is appropriately designated RO with R-
10 zoning.
• Whether the subject location is suitable for Convenience Commercial (CC) zoning.
RECOMMENDED SUMMARY:
• The site appears in conflict with Policy LU-220 on siting of small-scale commercial uses within
the City's Comprehensive Plan due to proximity to other small scale community businesses.
• However, a commercial re -use of the existing building to some sort of small-scale commercial use
such as a professional office, restaurant, barber/beauty shop, coffee shop, or flower shop that re-
uses the existing building may have some merit.
• Removing the existing building and developing the site into a drive -through use of some sort such
as a fast-food restaurant, or other use that draws in a great deal of vehicular traffic and on -site
circulation would be a detriment to the nearby neighborhood and traffic on Maple Valley
Highway.
• Council consider the 2904 Maple Valley Highway (Jones Rezone) amendment in the 2004
Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant has a unique situation. His property is the only one designated Residential Options with
R-10 zoning in the immediate area. It is located at the western edge of the Maplewood neighborhood.
The property does have a history as a gasoline station prior to the 1990's. However, it was converted
to residential use when a `Victorian' home was moved on to the site. King County property records
show that the home on this site was built in 1900.
As part of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan development process, this property was re -designated and
rezoned from the B-1 commercial classification to Residential Options with Residential-10 (R-10)
2904 MAPLE VALLEY HWY COMP PLAN AMENDMENT PRE.doc\
zoning. The property is surrounded by Residential Single Family (RSF) and Residential Rural (RR)
Comprehensive Plan designations, making it a spot zone. The applicant seeks Convenience
Commercial (CC) designation on this property, arguing that the subject property is near to other CC -
designated properties to the east. The applicant feels that the subject property would be a good fit for
a small-scale commercial business that would most likely make use of the existing structure.
The Comprehensive Plan includes a Convenience Commercial mapping policy which the applicant did
not include in his application. The policy, LU-220, is included below.
Policy LU-220. Small-scale commercial uses should be located:
a. within pedestrian range of existing and planned residential areas.
b. outside of the trade area of other small-scale commercial uses offering comparable goods
and services.
C. Contiguous to a street classified at the collector level.
The subject property is clearly within the trade area of other CC -zoned properties which may or may
not offer comparable goods and services. However, the building site is different from the abutting
neighborhood in that it has frontage directly on to Maple Valley Highway, and has direct left -turn
access from eastbound Maple Valley Highway to the property. The other residences in Maplewood all
have direct access to side streets.
The existing house fits in with the residential character of the neighborhood abutting to the east. If a
business could re -use the existing building, it would fit in with the character of the community and not
detract from neighborhood quality. Whatever use is proposed will need to ensure enough on -site
parking for employees and customers. Since the site is located along a busy highway with no
signalized intersection, a use without continual through traffic, like an office, would be better than one
with continual drive -through traffic. The Washington State Department of Transportation would need
to be consulted regarding the potential of re-establishing a commercial use along a state highway:
CONCLUSION
Due to the unique circumstances of this parcel as an R-10 spot zone with a history of commercial use,
staff recommends that this application has enough merit to warrant further examination as a potential
Commercial Convenience (CC) designated parcel. Staff suggests analyzing this parcel of property
under the following scenarios:
1. Remaining a Residential Options designation with R-10 zoning;
2. Redesignating to Residential Single Family designation with R-8 zoning similar to the
Maplewood neighborhood to the east; and
3. Redesignating to Convenience Commercial designation with CC zoning.
2904 MAPLE VALLEY HWY COMP PLAN AMENDMENT PRE.doc\
1 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
Subject:
Finance & IS Department
Victoria Runkle, Administrator,
x6858
Set a Public Hearing date of 11/24/2003 to consider the
proposed final 2004 Budget
Exhibits:
2004 Preliminary Budget Document
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Al #: o C
For Agenda of: 11/10/2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....,
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
0
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $145,700,500. Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $137,171.300
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In compliance with RCW, the 2004 Preliminary Budget was filed with the City Council and the
City Clerk on October 31, 2003. The first public hearing on the 2004 Preliminary Budget will be
held on November 17, 2003.
This agenda bill action sets a second public hearing on the proposed final 2004 Budget for
November 24, 2003.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set a public hearing date of November 24, 2003, for consideration of the proposed final 2004
Budget.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #:
For Agenda: 11/10/03
Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works Administration
Agenda
Staff Contact...... Sam Star, x-7291
Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Update Utility System Development Charges (SDC)
correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits:
New Business.......
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Staff report
Ordinance
`i/
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required ... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Not applicable
Amount Budgeted .......... $0 Revenue Generated......... Estimated at
$300,000/yr.
Total Project Budget Not Applicable City Share Total Project.. Not applicable
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
City Code directs the Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. staff to review the City's Utility
System Development Charges every two years to assure they remain accurate. Since Renton's
fee methodology is based upon current plant value of the utility, cost of the capital improvement
program for the succeeding two years, and developed acreage in the City, the assessment will
change over time.
The attached packet provides a review and update of these fees.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. recommends Council approve the updated Utility
System Development Charges (SDC) for the Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water Utilities
(Staff report page 1, column 2) and adopt the associated Ordinance to make the necessary
changes to City Code. PBPW recommends the new charges take effect January 1, 2004.
C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Oct. '03 agenda bill.doc/
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 30, 2003
TO: Kathy Koelker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: ' , Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman; Aginistrator
Planning/Building/Public W rks Department
STAFF CONTACT: Sam Star (x7291)
SUBJECT: Update the Utility System Development Charges (SDC)
ISSUE:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests approval to update the Utility System
Development Charges that new development is assessed to hook-up to the Water, Wastewater, and
Storm Water Utilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that the Council refer this issue to
the Council Utilities committee.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
City Code directs PB/PW Dept. staff to review the City's utility System Development Charges
(SDCs) every two years to assure that they remain accurate. Since Renton's methodology is based
upon current plant value of the utility, cost of the capital improvement program for the succeeding
two years, and developed acreage in the City, the assessment will change over time.
The attached packet provides a review and update of these fees. As can be seen, use of our fee
calculation methodology indicates a significant increase in these SDC fees (summarized on page of
the packet). The first table on page 2 of the packet shows the predicted amount of revenue that
would come to the Utility Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 421) in 2004 if these fees were to be
implemented effective January 1, 2004. The table also shows, in the far right hand column, the
approximate amount the utility rates would need to be raised to capture the same revenue.
October 30, 2003
Page 2
The second table on page two compares Renton single-family SDC fees with those of our
surrounding jurisdictions. Renton's current SDC fees summed for the three piped utilities (summed
fee) is significantly lower than that charged by any of our surrounding jurisdictions. The proposed
fee (summed fee) would continue to be the lowest fee charged by the nine jurisdictions shown.
Implementation of an SDC fee increase would bring the charged fee in line with our fee
methodology (and thus represent a more fair cost contribution from developers for utilizing the
system owned and maintained by the rate payers), and would also benefit the ratepayers by
providing a financial hedge against rate increases.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 21, 2003
To: Gregg Zimmerman
Lys Hornsby
From: Sam Star
Subject: Update of Utility System Development Charges (SDCs)
ISSUE:
Update the System Development Charges that new development is assessed to hook-up to the
Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water Utilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning, Building & Public Works recommends Council adopt the updated Utility System Development
Charges for the Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water Utilities, (column 2 in table below) plus changes
in the associated ordinances. PBPW recommends the new charges take effect on January 1, 2004.
Z
Increasing the Utility System Development Charges also helps off -set the need to raise utility
rates. The chart below indicates how much additional revenue each utility may receive if the
System Development Charges are increased.
Comparison of Utility System Development Charges (SDC):
Renton currently has the lowest utility system development charges of its neighboring
jurisdictions. Even with increasing the charges to the proposed rates, Renton would still have the
lowest fees in the immediate area.
A single family residence with 50 lineal feet of frontage requiring a 5/8" x 3/4" meter would pay
the following amount connect to the utility systems in the various cities and water/sewer
districts:
For more details about the various utility system development charges of Renton's neighboring
jurisdictions, see the chart on pages 17 — 18.
3
BACKGROUND:
The City currently charges a Utility System Development Charge (SDC) to properties desiring
new water, wastewater, or surface water service.
The basic approach for determining the fee is described below.
Calculate the current plant value of the utility. Subtract the contributions to the utility from such
sources as: a) grants from federal, state, and local sources, b) other funds such as local
improvements districts, special assessment districts, c) customer contributions, and d)
contractor/developer contributions. The remaining plant value that has not been contributed to
the utility through these various sources is that portion of the utility that was purchased by all
ratepayers, and is referred to as the utility's "customer equity." Add the value of the capital
improvement projects of the current year, plus the capital improvement costs of the next two
years. Divide the total customer equity by the number of developed acres in the entire city. In
this manner, an average cost for the individual utility to serve a developed acre is derived. The
Utility System Development Charge was established to ensure that new customers pay a fee to
"buy into" the existing utility infrastructure improvements that were paid for by the existing
customers of the system.
Table A (on page 5) lists the total end -of -year plant value of the Water, Wastewater, and Surface
Water Utilities from 1998 to 2002. The contributions to the three utilities from governmental
grants, local improvement districts and special assessment districts, plus customer and
contractor/developer contributions are outlined in Table B. By subtracting the contributions
(Table B) from the total plant value (Table A), the customer equity in all three utilities is derived
(Table Q.
The same equation of Plant Value - Contributions = Customer Equity has been separately
calculated for each of the three utilities. See Tables D - F for the Water Utility (page 6); Tables
G - I for the Wastewater Utility (page 7); and Tables J - L for the Surface Water Utility (page 8).
UTILITY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION:
The methodology used to calculate the connection charge for the Water and Wastewater Utilities
are identical with one another. Total customer equity plus the total number of developed acres
divides the cost of the current year's construction, and the following two-year capital
improvement plan.
Water Utility Fee: see Table M (page 9) for a calculation of the Water Utility fee that includes
the current year, plus the 2004-2005 capital improvement costs.
Wastewater Utility: see Table O (page 10) for a calculation of the Wastewater Utility fees that
includes the current year, plus the 2004-2005 capital improvement costs.
Surface Water Utility: see Table Q (page 11) for a calculation of the Storm Water Utility fee that
includes the current year, plus the 2004-2005 capital improvement costs.
DEFINITIONS OF VARIOUS TERMS:
a) Contributions by Other Funds: refers to Local Improvement Districts (LIDs), Special
Assessment Districts (SADs), and grants.
b) Customer Contributions: improvements paid for by the ultimate user of the property.
c) Contractor/Developer Contributions: improvements paid for by the builder of the property.
Cc: Abdoul Gafour, Dave Christensen, Ron Straka, Nenita Ching, Kayren Kittrick
WATER/ WASTEWATER/ SURFACE WATER UTILITIES
CURRENT PLANT VALUE
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Description 12/31 /1998 12/31 /2000 12/31 /2001 12131 /2002
Total fund 401 $157,588,923 $166,845 043 $194,682,595 $210,493,232
source: City of Renton Finance Dept., Waterworks Fund 401 Depreciation Schedule
Customer Equity = Current Plant Value [as shown above] minus
(Grants from Federal, State & Local Contributions +
Contributions from Other Funds such as LIDS & SADs +
Customer & Contracter/Developer Contributions)
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Federal Contributions:
271-00-10
Water
$894,498
$894,498
$894,498
$894,498
271-00-20
Sewer
$399,935
$531,505
$531,505
$531,505
271-00-30
Storm
$2 333,680
$3,800,611
$3,800,611
$3,800,611
Sub -Total
$3,628,113
$5,226,614
$5,226,614
$5,226,614
State & Local Contributions:
272-00-10
Water
$2,706,666
$2,933,294
$2,933,294
$2,933,294
272-00-20
Sewer
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
272-00-30
Storm
$1,555,951
$1,582,888
$1,582,888
$1,628,866
Sub -Total
$5,997,083
$6,250,648
$6,250,648
$6,296,626
Contributions by Other Funds
273-40-10
Water
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
273-40-20
Sewer
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
273-40-30
Storm
$20,238
$20,238
$20,238
$20,238
Sub -Total
$7,812,871
$7,812,871
$7,812,871
$7,812,871
Customer Contributions:
273-70-10
Water
$5,718,103
$7,324,022
$7,873,018
$8,727,724
273-70-20
Sewer
$3,963,808
$5,379,075
$6,014,842
$6,868,795
273-70-30
Storm
$20,888 244
$21 714,681
$21 955,926
$22,298 776
Sub -Total
$30,570,154
$34,417,778
$35,843,786
$37,895,295
Contractor/Developer Contributions:
273-80-10 Water
$28,278,174
$32,181,071
$34,429,161
$36,990,021
273-80-20 Sewer
$12,219,181
$13,189,881
$15,624,005
$17,777,027
273-80-30 Storm
$3 742 083
$5,363,694
$6,650 550
$8,893,808
Sub -Total
$44,239,439
$50,734,647
$56,703,717
$63,660,857
GRAND TOTALS $92,247,660 $104,442,558 $111,837,636 $120,892,263
Table C
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Description 12/31/1998 12/31/2000 12/31/2001 12/31/2002
Customer Equity $65,341,263 $62,402,485 $82,844,959 $89,600,969
vAUti1iliies1EQUrrY03.XLS 925I2003
WATER UTILITY
CURRENT PLANT VALUE
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Acct
Description
12/31/1998
12/31/2000
12/31/2001
12/31/2002
171.10
Land + Wtr Rights (Golf)
$1,826,902
$1,831,902
$1,831,632
$1,831,632
173.10
Building & Structures
$6,159,047
$6,442,331
$6,450,550
$6,450,550
179.10
Other Improvements
$65,951,947
$68,738,382
$79,417,025
$85,973,853
188.10
Machinery/Equip.
$3,094,198
$3,185,708
$3,007,587
$3,014,425
Total
$77,032,094
$80,198,323
$90,706,794
$97,270,460
(See Appendix A on page 12 for more details)
Table E
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Description
12/31 /1988
12/31/2000
12/31/2001
12/31 /2002
Federal Contributions:
271-00-10 Water
$894,498
$894,498
$894,498
$894,498
State & Local Contributions:
272-00-10 Water
$2,706,666
$2,933,294
$2,933,294
$2,933,294
Contributions by Other Funds:
273-40-10 Water
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
$5,271,336
Customer Contributions:
273-70-10 Water
$5,718,103
$7,324,022
$7,873,018
$8,727,724
Contractor/Developer Contributions:
273-80-10 Water
$28,278,174
$32,181,071
$34,429,161
$36,990,021
Total
$42,868,777
$48,604,221
$51,401,307
$54,816,874
Table F
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Description 12/31/1998 12/31/2000 12/31/2001 12/31/2002
Customer Equity $34.163.317 $31.594.102 $39.305.487 $42.453.586
cAUfiR iiesXEQUITY03.XLS 1021/2003
WASTEWATER UTILITY
CURRENT PLANT VALUE
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Acct
Description
12/31/1998
12/31/2000
12/31/2001
12/31/2002
171.20
Land
$0
$0
$0
$0
173.20
Building & Structures
$1,795,379
$1,948,936
$2,240,945
$2,240,945
179.20
Other Improvements
$39,008,689
$40,428,839
$50,531,422
$54,615,637
188.20
Machinery/Equip.
$807,391
$856,078
$788,505
$788,505
Total
$41,611,459
$43,233,853
$53,560,872
$57,645,087
{See Appendix B on page 13 for more details)
Table H
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Description
12/31 /1998
12/31 /2000
12/31 /2001
12/31 /2002
Federal Contributions:
271-00-20 Sewer
$399,934
$531,504
$531,504
$531,504
State & Local Contributions:
272-00-20 Sewer
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
$1,734,466
Contributions by Other Funds:
273-40-20 Sewer
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
$2,521,297
Customer Contributions:
273-70-20 Sewer
$3,963,807
$5,379,075
$6,014,842
$6,868,794
Contractor/Developer Contributions:
273-80-20 Sewer
$12,219,181
$13,189,881
$15,624,005
$17,777,027
Total
$20,838,685
$23,356,223
$26,426,114
$29,433,088
Table I
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Description 12/31 /1998 12/31 /2000 12/31 /2001 12/31 /2002
Customer Equity $20.772,774 $19.877.630 $27.134.758 $28.211,999
c.NUti1i[iies1EQUrY03.XLS 9/252003
SURFACE WATER UTILITY
CURRENT PLANT VALUE
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Acct
Description
12/31/1998
12/31/2000
12/31/2001
128/31/2002
171.30
Land
$1,677,138
$1,677,138
$1,677,138
$1,677,138
173.30
Building & Structures
$0
$0
$0
$0
179.30
Other Improvements
$37,087,597
$41,496,820
$48,546,065
$53,708,821
188.30
Machinery/Equip.
$180,635
$238,909
$191,726
$191,726
Total
$38,945,370
$43,412,867
$50,414,929
$55,577,685
{See Appendix C on page 14 for more details}
Table K
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Description
12/31 /1998
12/31/2000
12/31/2001
12/31 /2002
Federal Contributions:
271-00-30 Storm
$2,333,680
$3,800,611
$3,800,611
$3,800,611
State & Local Contributions:
272-00-30 Storm
$1,555,951
$1,582,888
$1,582,888
$1,628,866
Contributions by Other Funds:
273-40-30 Storm
$20,238
$20,238
$20,238
$20,238
Customer Contributions:
273-70-30 Storm
$20,888,243
$21,714,680
$21,955,926
$22,298,775
Contractor/Developer Contributions:
273-80-30 Storm
$3,742,083
$5,363,694
$6,650,550
$8,893,808
Total
$28 540,195
$32,482 111
$34 010 213
$36 642 298
T
Balance Balance Balance Balance
Description 12/31/1998 12/31/2000 12/31/2001 12/31/2002
Customer Equity $10,405.175 $10.930.756 $16.404.716 $18.935.387
c:wtaailesXEQutrr03.xrs 9/25/2003
0
Water Utility
System Development Connection Charge
Total Customer Equity using 12/31/02 Plant Value
Plus 2003-2005 Capital Improvement Costs
Table M
• Customer equity using 12/31/02 plant value
• Estimated 2003 - 2005 capital improvement costs
• Subtract out 2003 — 2005 predicted contributions
Total
• Developed acreage served by Water Utility (Aug. 2003)
• Water SDC fee assessment per developed acre
• Water SDC fee assessment/ sq. ft. (43,560 sq. ft./acre)
• Single-family assessment (based on avg. 7,165 sq. ft. lot)
• Round to nearest $5 increment
• Round down
1 See pages 5 and 6..
2 See page 15, Appendix D for more details.
3 Same as above.
4 See page 16 for more details.
$42,453,5861
$13,088,0002
($1,254,000)3
$54,287,586
5,654 acres4
$9,061.62/acre
22.04¢/sq. ft.
$1,579/single-family lot
$1,580/single-family lot
$1,525/single-family lot
Wastewater Utility
System Development Connection Charge
Total Customer Equity using 12/31/02 Plant Value
Plus 2003 - 2005 Capital Improvement Costs
Table N
• Customer equity using 12/31/02 plant value
• Estimated 2003 - 2005 capital improvement costs
• Subtract out 2003 — 2005 predicted contributions
• Total
• Developed acreage (Aug. 2003)
• Wastewater SDC fee assessment per developed acre
• Wastewater SDC fee assessment/sq. ft. (43,560 sq. ft. /acre)
$28,211, 9995
$97,637,5006
($1,045,000)7
$34,804,499
6,176 acres
$5,635 /acre
12.94¢/sq. ft.
• Single-family Wastewater assessment (based on avg. 7,165 sq. ft. lot) $926.95
• Round to the nearest $5 increment $925/single-family lot
• Round down $900/single-family lot
5 See pages 5 and 7.
6 See page 15, Appendix D, for more details.
7 Same as above.
Surface Water Utility
System Development Connection Charge
Total Customer Equity using 12/31/02 Plant Value
Plus 2003 - 2005 Capital Improvement Costs
Table O
• Customer equity (12/31/02)
$18,935,3878
• Estimated 2003 - 2005 capital improvement costs $7,188,0029
• Subtract out predicted 2003 - 2005 contributions ($795,000)
• Total
Assumptions:
$25, 328, 389
1. A common approach to computing connection charges is to determine the average
capital (public) investment per billing unit for the storm drainage system and then
multiply this figure by the number of billing units for the property. In the case of a
single family home, the billing unit count is 1. All other properties would be a
multiple of a single-family unit.
2. Using the current stormwater revenues and the single-family service charge rate, an
estimate of the total billing units can be computed:
Revenues per year/ Single family rate = Equivalent Billing Units (EBUs)
For 2002: $2,227,355/ (12 x $5.39 a month) = 34,436 EBUs
[Source: 2002 Stormwater Revenue]
3. Typical single-family lot is approximately 7,165 sq. ft.
4. Typically, about 40% of a single-family lot is impervious (2,866 sq. ft.)
5. 2,866 sq. ft. of impervious surface per lot multiplied by 34,436 EBUs yields an
estimate of 98,695,106 million sq. ft. of impervious surface within the City of Renton.
6. Customer Equity is $25,328,389 divided by the total impervious square footage
98,695,106 million sq. ft., derives a fee of $0.257 per square foot.
7. Multiplying the typical impervious area for a single-family lot (2,866 sq. ft.) by
($0.257/sq. ft.), a fee of $735.51 is derived for single-family connections. Round to
the nearest $5 increment: $735. Round down to $715.
8 See pages 5 and 8.
9 See page 15, Appendix D, for more details.
Appendix A
City of Renton
Water Utility -- Plant Value
Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
Account Description 12/31/1994 12/31/1995 12/31/1996 12/31/1997 12/31/98 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02
Land
171.10
Land & Land Rights
$1,101,683
$1,101,683
$1,101,683
$1,101,683
$986,986
$991,986
$991,716
$991,716
171.10
Land Held for Future Use
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
$28,916
171.40
Water Rights (Golf Course)
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
$811,000
Sub -Total
$1,941,599
$1,941,599
$1,941,599
$1,941,599
$1,826,902
$1,831,902
$1,831,632
$1,831,632
Buildings
and Structures
173.10
Structures & Improvement;
$3,203,330
$3,270,089
$4,383,547
$4,383,547
$6,159,047
$6,442,331
$6,450,550
$6,450,550
Other Improvements
179.10
Wells & Springs
$2,531,347
$10,663,729
$11,166,573
$11,166,573
$11,648,797
$11,813,830
$11,813,830
$14,302,310
179.10
Transmission & Distributio
$30,112,566
$30,983,434
$33,070,542
$34,959,001
$37,369,089
$38,805,475
$43,634,492
$46,409,496
179.10
Hydrants
$2,287,778
$2,330,032
$2,464,475
$2,575,147
$2,696,066
$2,687,579
$2,644,098
$2,625,978
179.10
Distribution/ Reservoir
$4,899,350
$4,899,350
$4,901,401
$4,901,401
$5,282,586
$5,365,589
$8,666,793
$8,666,793
179.10
Meters
$917,084
$949,196
$1,097,725
$1,180,759
$1,371,458
$1,479,133
$1,821,969
$1,889,110
179.10
Supply Mains
$320,645
$2,527,251
$2,903,420
$3,169,120
$4,563,398
$5,126,612
$6,822,989
$7,918,385
179.10
Services
$1,936.423
$2,023,687
$2,194,708
$2,310,415
$2,441,603
$2.572,791
$2,766,110
$2,877,573
179.10
Other Tangible
$204,451
$204,451
$366,564
$366,564
$578,649
$887,374
$1,246,744
$1,284,208
Sub -Total
$43,209,644
$54,581,130
$58,165,407
$60,628,980
$65,951,647
$68,738,382
$79,417,025
$85,973,853
Machinery/Equipment
188.10
Tools & Shop Equip.
$166,230
$173,299
$187,508
$189,897
$213,385
$241,217
$157,244
$164,082
188.10
Transportation Equip.
$6,738
$6,738
$6,738
$6,738
$6,738
$6,738
$5,211
$5,211
188.10
Water Treatment Equip.
$935,831
$935,831
$935,831
$935,831
$935,831
$935,831
$932,921
$932,921
188.10
Office Furniture
$104,937
$104,937
$104,937
$108,886
$108,886
$108,886
$93,925
$93,925
188.10
Laboratory Equip.
$19,884
$19,884
$19,884
$19,884
$19,884
$19,884
$6,260
$6,260
188.10
Electric Pumping Equip.
$1,311,549
$1,315,183
$1,315,183
$1,315,183
$1,315,183
$1,315,183
$1,309,224
$1,309,224
188.10
Miscellaneous Equip.
$142
$20,894
$20,894
$20,894
$20,894
$27,084
$48,361
$48,361
188,10
Electronic Shop Equip.
$9,574
$9,574
$9,574
$9,574
$9,574
$9,576
$0
$0
188.10
Power Operated Equip.
$3,419
$3,419
$3,419
$3,419
$3,419
$3,419
$0
$0
188.10
Compute Eq (was Comm)
$129,014
$129,496
$129,496
$129,496
$129,496
$186,981
$129,610
$129,610
188.10
Communication Equip.
$330,909
$330,909
$330,909
$330,909
$330,909
$330,909
$324,831
$324,831
Sub -Total
$3,018,226
$3,050,163
$3,064,372
$3,070,710
$3,094,198
$3,185,708
$3,007,587
$3,014,425
GRAND TOTAL $51,372 799 $62,842:982 $67,554,925 $70,024,835 $77,031,795 $80 198 323 $90 706 794 $97 270,460
APPF" 4
XLS /25/2003
Appendix B
City of Renton
Wastewater Utility -- Plant Value
Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
Account Description 12/31/1994 12/31/1995 12/31/1996 12/31/1997 12/31/1998 12/31/2000 12/31/2001 12/31/2002
Land
171.20 Land & Land Rights
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Buildings and Structures
173.20 Structures & Improvements $1,795,379 $1,795,379 $1,795,379 $1,795,379 $1,795,379 $1,948,936 $2,240,945 $2,490,129
Other Improvements
179,20 Transmission & Distribution $21,179,094 $25,640,797 $30,744,140 $36,063,607 $38,097,194 $39,517,344 $49,521,515 $53,605,730
179.20 Other Tangible $320,929 $320,929 $861,474 $911,495 $911,495 $911,495 $1,009,907 $1,009,907
Sub -Total $21,500,023 $25,961,726 $31,605,614 $36,975,102 $39,008,689 $40,428,839 $50,531,422 $54,615,637
Machinery/Equipment
188.20
Laboratory Equip.
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
$58,945
188.20
Electronic Shop Equip.
$1,609
$1,609
$1,609
$1,609
$1,609
$1,609
$0
$0
188.20
Communication Equip.
$3,985
$3,985
$3,985
$3,985
$3,985
$3,985
$0
$0
188.20
Computer Eq (was Comm)
$49,082
$39,644
$48,505
$48,505
$48,505
$90,284
$81,261
$81,261
188.20
Office Furniture
$17,723
$17,723
$17,723
$17,723
$17,723
$17,723
$0
$0
188.20
Tools & Shop Equip.
$28,024
$64,668
$93,962
$106,367
$114,019
$120,927
$85,695
$65,695
188,20
Electric Pumping Equip.
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
$562,604
Sub -Total
$721,973
$749,179
$787,334
$799,740
$807,391
$856,078
$788,505
$788,505
GRAND TOTAL $24,017 375 $28 506,284 $34 188 328 $39 570 222 $41 611 460 $43 233 853 $53 560 872 $57 894 271
.m
W
AP P EN B.XLS 9/25/2003
Appendix C
City of Renton
Surface Water Utility -- Plant Value
Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
Account Description 12/31/1994 12/31/1995 12/31/1996 1/1/1997 12/31/1998 12/31/2000 12/31/2001 12/31/2002
Land
171.30 Land & Land Rights
$224,892
$329,030
$498,969
$1,606,194
$1,666,967
$1,677,138
$1,677,138
$1,677,138
Building and Structure
173.30 Structures & Improvements
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Improvements
179.30 Transmission & Distribution
$28,596,070
$29,940,782
$31,588,963
$34,048,031
$36,146,102
$40,555,584
$47,604,829
$52,332,417
179.30 Other Tangible
$337,983
$337,983
$337,983
$337,983
$941,495
$941,236
$941,236
$1,376,404
Sub -Total
$28,934,053
$30,278,765
$31,926,946
$34,386,014
$37,087,597
$41,496,820
$48,546,065
$53,708,821
Machinery/Equipment
188.30 Office Furniture
$17,263
$17,263
$17,263
$17,263
$17,263
$17,263
$15,463
$15,463
188.30 Tools & Shop Equipment
$43,901
$48,484
$66,608
$66,608
$77,733
$84,345
$51,829
$51.829
188.30 Computer Eq (was Comm)
$70,756
$73 430
$79,581
$82,376
$85,640
$137,301
$124,434
$124,434
Sub -Total
$131,919
$139,176
$163,452
$166,246
$180,635
$238,909
$191,726
$191,726
GRAND TOTAL
$29,290,864
$30,746,971
$32,589,367
$36,158,455
$38,935,199
$43,412,867
$50,414,929
$55,577,685
APPENC.XLS
9/25/2003
15
Appendix D
2003 - 2005 Utility Spending Plans
Water:
$3,600,000 2003 Spending Plan is $4,000,000 (assume 90% completion)
$6,744,000 2004 CIP is $8,430,000 (assume 80% completion)
$2,744,000 2005 CIP is $3,430,000 (assume 80% completion)
$13,088,000 2003 — 2005 CIP investment
- $1,254,000 Projected 2003 - 2005 SDC revenue ($418,000 per year)
$11,834,000
Wastewater:
$2,317,500 2003 Revised Spending Plan is $2,575,000 (assume 90% completion)
$3,400,000 2004 CIP is $4,250,000 (assume 80% completion)
$1,920,000 2005 CIP is $2,400,000 (assume 80% completion)
$7,637,500 2003 — 2005 CIP investment
- $1,045,000 Projected 2003 - 2005 SDC & SAD revenue
$6,592,500
Stormwater•
$2,268,002 2003 Spending Plan is $2,520,002 (assume 90% completion)
$3,320,000 2004 CIP is $4,150,000 (assume 80% completion)
$1,600,000 2005 CIP is $2,000,000 (assume 80% completion)
$7,188,002 2003 — 2005 CIP investment
- $795,000 Projected 2003 - 2005 SDC revenue ($265,000 per year)
$6,939,002
Ic
9/9/03
Utility System Development Charges
Number of Developed Acres
Total City of Renton: 10,986 acres
Total R-O-W: 1,869 acres
- Subtracted zoned acreage (9,117 ac.) from total acreage of City.
Number of developed acres: 6,176 acres
- Total area of parcels in the City with improvement values less than or equal to $1000
(2,941 ac.) and subtracted from the zoned acreage (9,117 ac.).
Source: Gary del Rosario, EDSPN
Area within City of Renton currently served by Water District 90: 22,747,546 sq ft, or 522.2
acres.
Number of developed acres served by Renton Water Utility: 6,176 acres — 522 acres = 5,654
acres.
Source: Michael Benoit, PBPW Utilities
1-1
9/25/03
Comparison of Utility System Development Charges
(A.k.a. connection charges, capital facility charge, general facility charges, and local facility charge)
Current as of Sept. 2003
WATER SEWER STORM
Residential
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
AUBURN
Less than 1" meter
1" meter =
$933
$850/ residential
$911
_ $1,738
$2,894
customer equivalent
(RCE)
BELLEVUE
$16.09/month for
$8.67/ month for
$2.83/ 2,000 sq. ft.
10 yrs. = $1930.80
10 yrs. = $1,040
of chargeable
Plus, a Regional
area/month for 10
Capital Facilities
yrs. = $339.60
Charge: $1,680
Renton uses a fee
based on 2,866 sq.
ft. This is 1.433
times the Bellevue
fee. Or, $486.65.
Coal Creek
$1,930 general
$1,930 general
Not applicable
Water &
facilities charge.
facilities charge.
Sewer Dist.
Plus $4,500, or
Plus $4,500, or
$43.50/ lineal foot
$48.50/ lineal foot
(whichever is
(whichever is
greater) for a local
greater) for a local
facilities charge.
facilities charge.
KENT
5/8" x 3/4" meter:
$0
Varies depending
$2,600
on the different
storm water basins.
Average fee is
approx. $550
KIRKLAND
5/8/" x 3/4" meter:
5/8/" x 3/4" meter:
$0
Water Capital
Sewer Capital
Facility Charge =
Facility Charge =
$2,175
$1,985
Regional Capital
Facility Charge =
$1,680
SDC CHART 03.DOC\
WATER
SEWER
STORM
Residential
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
REDMOND
5/8" x 3/4" meter:
5/8" x 1/4" meter:
$0
$3,225
$1,425
RENTON
$1,105
$0.154/s.i, not
$760
$0.106/ s.f., not less
$525/ single family
less than $1,105
than $760
Commercial:
$0.183/ s.f., not less
than $525
SOOS
$1,581 per
$.01581/sq. ft.
$2,047 per ERU
$0.2047/ sq. ft.
Not applicable
CREEK
Equivalent
Residential Unit
(ERU)
Plus, a Seattle
Public Utilities
Facilities
Connection Charge
of $713 per ERU.
Water
General facility
Not applicable
Not applicable
District # 90
charge of $3,200.
Plus, a local
facility charge of
approx. $35/ lineal
feet of frontage.
SDC CHART 03.DOC\
4-1-1801
,,
family meter) that has a safe operat-
ing capacity of twenty (20) gallons
per minute (GPM), to a commercial
usage with a one and one half inch
(1-112") meter with a safe operating
capacity of one hundred (100) GPM
can apply to pay for the following pro-
rated charges:
(100 GPM — 20 GPM)/(100 GPM) _
0.8
For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x
ip
$0.213
2154tgq. ft.) _ $J,2a=1"UO ►, 70
For sewer: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x
$0,10ftq. ft.)_ $�:$
( /
Without the redevelopment credit,
this project would have paid $W-<6/ . I Z(o
sq. ft. x 10,000 sq. ft. = $�6"0 for 0/� ZOO
sewer and paid $(l�sq. ft. x .213
10,000 sq. ft. = $1,54fM0 for water.
2/ 130
Example 2: A property owner is
planning to redevelop a half acre par-
cel that includes a single family home
with a five -eighths inch by three-
quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a
standard single family meter) that
has a safe operating capacity of
twenty (20) GPM. The new develop-
ment will be an eight (8) unit multi-
family dwelling with a two inch (2")
meter with a safe operating capacity
of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a
three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation
meter with a safe operating capacity
of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch
(4") meter for fire sprinklers. The
property owner can apply to pay the
following prorated charges:
For water: based on meters (160
GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM)/(160
GPM + 30 GPM) = 89.5%
based on fire service = 30%
Total = 119.5%
Therefore,100% of the water system
development charge would be due.
(8 units x0/unit — $ 20.00)
9 t S �, 320
For sewer: based on meters — irriga-
tion meter excluded (160 GPM — 20
GPM)/(160 GPM) = 87.5%
Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer sys-
tem development charge would be
due.
$540
87.5% x (8 units x 00/unit) _
$3b0
'F 3, 780
Without the redevelopment credit,
this project would have paid00/
unit x 8 units = $3 . .
+, 320
d. Exemptions to System Develop-
ment Charge:
i. Installation of an Irrigation
Meter Solely for the Purpose of
Providing Irrigation Water to City
Right -of -Way: Installation of a water
meter solely for the purpose of pro-
viding irrigation water to City right-of-
way is exempted from the system de-
velopment charge.
ii. Exemption for City -Owned
Property: No system development
charge will be collected on City -
owned properties. The benefits to the
utility from the use of other City prop-
erties such as utility easements, lift
stations and other benefits offset the
amount of the system development
charge.
iii. Limited Exemptions for Mu-
nicipal Corporations: A limited ex-
emption to the system development
charge will be granted to municipal
corporations for portions of property
subject to the system development
charge to the extent that those spe-
cific areas are available and main-
tained at all times for public use (e.g.,
ballfields adjacent to a school build-
ing) and shall be segregated from the
fee determination as herein pro-
vided. In applying this exemption to
the extent possible, a single straight
line shall be drawn across the prop-
erty separating the exempt property
from the property to be charged. If a
single straight line would not achieve
substantial equity, then additional
(Revised 3/03) 1-30
4-1-1801
nd lighting) from the owners of property
ttributed to said site will be due at
ho would benefit from future connec-
ch time as the parcel develops fur-
t ns to, or future users of, improvements
th r either by subdivision or in-
t the City's infrastructure that were not
cre sed density. In the case of a
in talled by LIDs or by a private devel-
spe 'al assessment district, interest
op r under a latecomer agreement. The
will c ntinue to accrue on the remain -
imp sition, collection, payment and other
ing po ion of the assessment.
spec ics concerning these charges are
detail d in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special
iv. Re location of Assessment
Asses ent Districts. Interest may be
Due to S bdivision of Property:
charge pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Pay-
The Plann g/Building/Public Works
ments to City.
Administrat r will consider realloca-
tion of the la comer's assessment
c. Exem tions for Latecomer's or
or the special ssessment if a prop -
Special As essment District Fees:
erty is subdivi d for any purpose
other than singl family use. Reallo-
i. Segr gation of Fees: The City
cation may be gr nted based upon
may gran segregation of private de-
front footage, area, or other equitable
veloper lat comer's fees or special
means. Considerati n may be given
assessmen district fees on large
to adjusting the asses ment between
parcels of la d per subsection (1)(3)
the new parcels, base Pon value of
of this Sectio
benefit from the improve ents, such
that two (2) similar parcel may pay
ii. Relief Du to Two (2) Similar
different amounts because ne re -
Facilities: The lanning/Building/
ceives more benefit.
Public Works A ministrator will con-
sider relieving a arcel of a late-
2. System Development Charges (SDC)
comer's or sped I assessment
— Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water:
district fee/asses ment if the prop-
The City may hold and charge certain other
erty has a benefit om either (but not
fees similar to special assessment district
both) of two (2) si ilar facilities. The
charges, which are commonly referred to as
Planning/Building/ ublic Works Ad-
system development charges."
ministrator will mak the decision
based on engineeri and policy de-
a. Applicability of System Develop-
cisions as to which f cility(s) benefit
ment Charge: The system development
and/or are utilized by he parcel. The
charge is hereby imposed against prop -
assessment due woul be that asso-
erties and, by inference, the owners of
ciated with the utilized acility. If there
said properties which have not been as -
are no sound engineer g or policy
sessed or charged or borne an equitable
reasons that indicate o facility over
share of the cost of the City's utility sys-
the other, the City shall ive the ap-
tems. Said property owner(s) shall pay,
plicant the choice of faci 'ties to uti-
prior to connection to or benefit from a
lize.
City utility or utility facility, the system de-
velopment charge associated with that
iii. Relief Due to Futur Subdivi-
utility as detailed in the fees table in sub-
sion: At the time the latec mer's
section (1)(2)(b) of this Section. A parcel
agreement or special asse sment
may benefit from a City utility system dur-
district is formed, and as a ondition
ing the development or redevelopment of
of the latecomer's agreeme t or spe-
the property with or without a connection
cial assessment district, the ity may
to an established facility. Therefore, the
require that the assessment gainst
system development charge for a utility
a parcel be divided such that single
may be triggered without a physical con -
family residential connection ill be
nection to an existing facility.
assessed based upon the siz of a
typical single family residentia lot in
i. Development of a utility system
that area. The remainder of the cost
shall mean:
1 - 25
(Revised 3/03)
4-1-1801
Exceptions:
The addition of an irrigation meter
only for an existing single family res-
idential dwelling will not trigger a sys-
tem development charge for water or
sewer.
If an existing single family residence
is being remodeled or rebuilt and re-
mains a single family residence on
the same lot (not involved in a new
plat, short plat, or lot line adjust-
ment), the addition of a larger or ad-
ditional meter will not trigger the
system development charges for wa-
ter or sewer.
The addition of a second meter to an
existing duplex in order to divide con-
sumption for billing purposes will not
trigger a system development
charge.
Existing Developments — Sur-
face Water: Property that was
developed before the effective
date of the first development
charge ordinances for surface
(storm) water in 1992 is ex-
empted from the surface water
system development charge.
The addition of any new impervi-
ous surface to exempted proper-
ties will require payment of the
system development charge for
surface water for the additional
new impervious area only. If an
exempted property is making a
connection for the first time to a
surface water system, it will re-
quire payment of the system de-
velopment charge for surface
water only for the impervious
area tributary to the point of con-
nection. Any rebuilding, change
in use or additions to exempted
property that does not create ad-
ditional impervious surface area
or does not cause a first time
connection to be made will not
require payment of the system
development charge for surface
water.
Exceptions:
Improvements to existing single fam-
ily residential units such as additions
that are less than five hundred (500)
square feet, decks, small sheds and
other minor improvements are ex-
empt from the system development
charge for surface water unless a
new connection to the Renton sur-
face water utility collection system is
proposed or required as part of the
permit application.
b. System Development Charge
Table:
Single family
residence
-QD per dwelling unit
2
$'IG8,Q0 per dwelling unit
00
$5�00 per dwelling unit
115
Mobile/Manufactured
Homes located in a
720
-115,
mobile home or
$�8 b.% per dwelling unit
3�per dwelling unit
$5 er dwelling unit
manufactured home
I/VLO
park
Multi -family - c1157
$ . 0 per dwelling unit
$ per dwelling unit
(in all zones except
(auxiliary buildings like club
(auxiliary buildings like club
zl 9
CD and COR zones)
houses are considered
houses are considered
$0_'83.per square foot of
inclusive to the
inclusive to the
new impervious
development and are not
development and are not
surfacing, but not less
counted as a dwelling unit
counted as a dwelling unit
than $00
and are thus not included
and are thus not included
115-
in the calculation of the fee)
in the calculation of the fee)
1 - 27 (Revised 3/03)
4-1-1801
lines may be drawn to include sub-
stantial open space areas in the ex-
emption. For purposes of this
exemption, substantial open space
areas shall be at least one hundred
thousand (100,000) square feet in
area. Lines shall not be drawn closer
than fifteen feet (15') to any struc-
ture.
Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots,
driveways, walkways, similar ar-
eas and required landscape ar-
eas shall not be part of the
exempt area.
Administrative Fees: The appli-
cant shall pay the City's adminis-
trative costs for the preparation,
processing and recording the
segregated fee. At the time of
application for system develop-
ment charge segregation the ap-
plicant shall pay the
administrative fee of seven hun-
dred fifty dollars ($750.00).
Restrictive Covenants: The ex-
emption must be memorialized
by means of a restrictive cove-
nant running with the land.
Should the property exempted
under this Section later develop,
then that property shall pay the
system development charge in
place at the time of development.
Interpretation of Partial Pay-
ment: The Administrator of the
Planning/Building/Public Works
Department shall make the final
decision on the interpretation of
this limited exemption and the
achievement of substantial eq-
uity.
iv. Exemption for Undeveloped
Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped
Major Easement(s): When calculat-
ing the area to be charged the sys-
tem development charge,
undeveloped critical areas (per RMC
4-11-030) and undeveloped major
easements within the property shall
not be included in the square footage
for the calculation of the charge. It is
the responsibility of the property
owner or applicant to submit a study
determining and classifying the criti-
cal area. The property owner or ap-
plicant shall submit a legal
description of any easements) or
critical area(s) so that these portions
of the property can be exempted
from the development charge(s).
The intent of this exemption is to not
charge property that is undevelop-
able. If the property is used or can be
used to satisfy any condition of the
development such as parking or
landscaping, it shall be considered
developed and does not meet the
qualifications of this exemption.
v. Exemption Credit for Regional
Improvements: If an applicant's
project proposes to solve a regional
drainage problem, over and above
the requirements to mitigate their
project's impacts, the value of the ad-
ditional improvement shall be cred-
ited toward the surface water system
development charges due. The ap-
plicant must provide the Administra-
tor of the Department of Planning/
Building/Public Works with the costs
of the drainage improvements and a
suggested method of calculating the
costs due to the extra work done to
solve a regional drainage problem.
The Administrator will make the final
decision on the amount of the credit.
In no instance shall the credit dupli-
cate a latecomer's agreement such
that the applicant will be paid twice,
nor may the credit against the con-
nection charge exceed the connec-
tion charge (i.e., no payment to the
applicant under this Section).
vi. Surface Water Exemption for
Infiltration Facility: Developments
which infiltrate or contain on site one
hundred percent (100%) of the on -
site storm water runoff volume from a
one hundred (100) year storm are ex-
empt from the surface water system
development charge. For the appli-
cation of this credit, the owner/devel-
oper must use the current design
criteria to show that the infiltration fa-
1 - 31 (Revised 3/03)
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-1-180.I.2.b AND 4-1-180.I.2.c OF SECTION
4-1-180, PUBLIC WORKS FEES, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION
AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF
GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON-
BY INCREASING WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SURFACE WATER
FEES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-180.I.2.b of Section 4-1-180, Public Works Fees,
of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as shown on Exhibit A, attached.
SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-180.I.2.c.iv of Section 4-1-180, Public Works Fees,
of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as follows:
iv. Examples:
Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home
on a ten thousand (10,000) square foot lot with a five eighths inch by three quarter inch meter
(5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20)
gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one half inch (1-1/2") meter
with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100) GPM can apply to pay for the following
prorated charges:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
(100 GPM — 20 GPM)/(I 00 GPM) = 0.8
For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.213/sq. ft.) _ $1,704.00
For sewer: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.126/sq. ft.) _ $1,008.00
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.126/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq.
ft. _ $1,260.00 for sewer and paid $0.213/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq. ft. _ $2,130.00 for water.
Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes a
single family home with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a standard
single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) GPM. The new
development will be an eight (8) unit multi -family dwelling with a two inch (2") meter with a
safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation
meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch (4") meter for fire
sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges:
89.5%
For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM)/(160 GPM + 30 GPM) _
based on fire service = 30%
Total = 119.5%
Therefore, 100% of the water system development charge would be due.
(8 units x $915.00/unit = $7,320.00)
For sewer: based on meters — irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM — 20 GPM)/(160
GPM) = 87.5%
Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due.
87.5% x (8 units x $540.00/unit) _ $3,780.00
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $540.00/unit x 8 units =
$4320.00.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
30 days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
,Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1052:10/30/03:ma
Exhibit A
b. System Development Charge Table:
Type of Land Use:
Water Fee Amount:
Wastewater Fee Amount:
Surface Water Fee
Amount:
Ingle family
residence
$1,525.00 per dwelling unit,
$900.00 per dwelling unit
_
$715.00 per dwelling unit
Mobile/Manufactured
_
Homes located in a mobile
home or
$1,220.00 per dwelling unit
$720.00 per dwelling unit
$715.00 per dwelling unit
manufactured home rk
ulti-family
$915.00 per dwelling unit
$540.00 per dwelling unit
in all zones except CD and
(auxiliary buildings like dub
(auxiliary buildings like dub
OR zones)
houses are considered
houses are considered
$0.249 per square foot of .
inclusive to the
development and are not
inclusive to the
development and are not
new impervious surfacing,
counted as a dwelling unit
counted as a dwelling unit `
but not less than $715.00
and are thus not included in
and are thus not included in
the calculation of the fee)
the calculation of the fee
Mixed Use
Mixed use buildings with
Mixed use buildings with
in all zones except CD and
over 50% floor space used
over 50% floor space used
$0.249 per square foot of
OR zones)
for residential shall be
for residential shall be
new impervious surface,
assessed at the rate of
assessed at the rate of
but not less than $715.00
$915.00 per dwelling unit
$540.00 per dwelling unit
D and COR zones
$0.213 per gross square
$0.126 per gross square
$0.249 per square foot of
foot of property, but not
foot of property, but not
new impervious, but not
less than $1,525.00
less than $900.00
less than $715.00
All other uses
$0.213 per gross square
$0.126 per gross square
$0.249 per square foot of
foot of property, but not
foot of property, but not
new impervious surface,
less than $1,525.00
less than $900.00
but not less than $715.00
r
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #: J
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems
Staff Contact...... Ryan Plut, Ext. 7372
Subject:
Appropriation Increase for the
Renton Municipal Airport 2003 Paving, Lighting, and
Signing Improvements Project (CAG 03-037)
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
For Agenda of:
November 10, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
X
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $ 3,425,000.00 Transfer/Amendment....... $ 150,000.00
Amount Budgeted....... $ 3,275,000.00 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $ 3,425,000.00 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
We are reaching the conclusion of our construction project on the airfield. Schedule C of the
project involved removal of the failed dust cover pavement. On October 4, 2003, during removal
of this pavement, the contractor discovered that subsurface contaminants existed in certain areas of
the subgrade along taxiway Bravo and taxiway Kilo. Soil samples were collected and analyzed on
October 6, 2003. The contamination involves jet -fuel type A, diesel fuel, and lubricating oil. This
unanticipated situation will cause us to exceed our previously approved budget of $3,275,000.
Staff requests Council authorize additional funds in the amount of $150,000.00 to increase the
approved appropriation from $3,275,000 to $3,425,000. The added funds will come from the
Airport Reserve Fund, which will be reimbursed with a 90-10 split with the FAA. The Airport
Reserve Fund will have approximately $2.7 million by the end of this fiscal year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council increase the approved appropriation by authorizing additional funds in
the amount of $150,000 from the Airport Reserve Fund. The previous budget was $3,275,000,
bringing the revised budget to a total of $3,425,000 for the Renton Municipal Airport 2003 Paving,
Lighting, and Signing Improvements Project.
Shared:Trans/Admin/AgendaBi112003/AgbilI Rwy L,D,S 10-23-03
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 10, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman�A ministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Plut, x 7372
Leslie Lahndt, x 7223
SUBJECT: Appropriation Increase for the Renton Municipal Airport 2003 Paving,
Lighting, and Signing Improvements Project (CAG 03-037)
ISSUE:
Hazardous materials have been discovered during construction of the 2003 Taxiway, Lighting, and
Signing Improvements Project. This was an unanticipated situation, which will cause us to exceed our
previously approved spending authority of $3,275,000.00 for the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council increase the approved appropriation by authorizing additional funds in the
amount of $150,000 from the Airport Reserve Fund. The previous budget was $3,275,000, bringing the
revised budget to a total of $3,425,000 for the Renton Municipal Airport 2003 Paving, Lighting, and
Signing Improvements Project.
BACKGROUND:
Schedule C of this project involves removal of the failed dust cover pavement. During removal of this
pavement, the Contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Co. (GMCC) discovered subsurface contaminants
that existed in certain areas of the subgrade along taxiway Bravo and taxiway Kilo. Soil samples were
immediately collected and analyzed. The contamination consists of varying quantities of jet -fuel type A,
diesel fuel, and lubricating oil. The Department of Ecology requires removal of soils with readings over
MTCA levels. The Contractor, GMCC, will work under a force account arrangement to excavate and
remove these soils to a Boeing -owned disposal site. W&H Pacific, together with Health Risk Associates
and Boeing will monitor and document the work. Actual costs of remediation will be apportioned
between Boeing and the City of Renton. Boeing will handle the remediation of materials exceeding
acceptable levels of hazardous materials by a pre-existing agreement between Boeing and the
Department of Ecology. All other materials contaminated but below the threshold level describing a
toxic material will be removed to the Black River Waste Site. The costs of this work will be handled by
force account as approved by the FAA, and paid for under Change Order #6. The actual costs, Boeing's
contribution, and the extent of the contamination leading to materials taken to Boeing's waste site, and
those materials taken to the Black River site will not be firmly known for a few more weeks, or about the
third week of November.
Therefore, the extent we will exceed our budget is not known. We can project forward the known project
costs and estimate the unknown costs related to handling the hazardous materials. We believe we need
to extend our spending authority by $150,000.00. The estimated quantity of material to be removed is
1,375 cubic yards, with Boeing responsible for 1,000 cubic yards and the City responsible for 375 cubic
yards. The City's construction manager for this project, W&H Pacific, has re -drafted Change Order 46
to include remediation of these materials. The actual costs of remediation, the extent of Boeing's
contribution, or any other details related to handling the hazardous materials will not be known until
project completion. This will also impact the overall project by complicating construction, and
extending construction into inclement weather, and also will not be fully known until project completion,
which is projected to be the end of November. We made a high estimate including direct and indirect
costs related to the unanticipated event of running into hazardous materials in the final stage of the
project. We feel that extending our spending authority by $150,000.00 will cover all remaining project
expenditures.
We are processing this agenda bill and issue paper based on high level estimates, projecting a needed
increase in our spending authority of $150,000, to go Council concur, upon the direction on the
Transportation Committee at an informational briefing two weeks ago.
Attachments
Cc: Jay Covington
City Clerk
Leslie Lahndt
Ryan Zulauf
Ryan Plut
H:Trans/Admin/AgendaBi112003/lncrease Appropriation on CAG 03-037 Airport 2
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI ✓✓:
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems
November 10, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Ryan Plut, Ext. 7372
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Renton Municipal Airport
Correspondence..
Apron C Utilities Project - Electrical Conversion
Ordinance .............
Consultant: W&H Pacific, Inc.
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
. Study Sessions......
Contract
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept......... X
Refer to Transportation Committee Finance Dept......
Other.... ..
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $100,000.00 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $358,000.00 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Apron C Utilities Project was approved in the 2003 Capital Improvement Program. The
project involves improvements to the electrical system at the Renton Municipal Airport. The
project is primarily for improvements to the electrical systems servicing Buildings 780, 790, 800,
820, the Apron C restrooms, ramp lighting and two electric vehicle gates. The work also
includes interim upgrades to the 790 Building (Airport Maintenance shop) and the 800 Building
allowing the 800 Building to be leased by the City prior to completion. Funding is required to
cover the design consultant contract.
Staff requests funds in the amount of $100,000.00 be authorized for this project. The needed
funding will come from the approved project budget. The contract amount is $79,794.76, which
will cover consultant services with the remaining funding needed to cover staff costs (soft costs)
and contingencies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve funds in the amount of $100,000 to convert Airport
buildings from the existing Boeing -owned power system to City -owned utilities. Staff further
recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the W&H Pacific, Inc. contract in
the amount of $79,794.76 for this conversion and an additional $20,205.24 to cover City staff
soft costs and contingencies.
Shared:?Tans/admen/AgendaBi112003/Airport Electrical System Upgrade
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 10, 2003
TO:
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: �
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM:
Gregg Zimmel<t d istrator
STAFF CONTACT:
Ryan Plut, x7372; Leslie Lahndt, x7223
SUBJECT:
Renton Municipal Airport
Apron C Utilities Project — Electrical Conversion
Consultant: W&H Pacific, Inc.
ISSUE:
Boeing utilities are currently supplying certain buildings at the Renton Municipal Airport. It is
necessary to change these buildings over to City -owned utilities before the City can lease any
facilities out.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve funds in the amount of $100,000 to convert Airport
buildings from the existing Boeing -owned power system to City -owned utilities. Staff further
recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the W&H Pacific, Inc. contract in
the amount of $79,794.76 for this conversion and an additional $20,205.24 to cover City staff
soft costs and contingencies.
BACKGROUND:
The project involves improvements to the electrical system at the Renton Municipal Airport.
The project is primarily for improvements to the electrical systems servicing Buildings 780, 790,
800, 820, the Apron C restrooms, ramp lighting and two electric vehicle gates. The work also
includes interim upgrades to the 790 Building (Airport Maintenance shop) and the 800 Building
allowing the 800 Building to be leased out by the City.
Attachments:
cc: Jay Covington
City Clerk
Sandra Meyer
Leslie Lahndt
Ryan Zulauf
Ryan Plut
Consultant/Address/Telephone
Local Agency
W&H Pacific
Standard Consultant
3350 Monte Villa Parkway
Agreement
g
Bothell, WA 98021
425.951.4800
Agreement Number
------------------------ -
Federal Aid Number
Project Title And Work Description
Apron C Utilities Project - Electrical Conversion
Agreement Type (Choose one)
❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
® Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate 154.7 %
DBE Participation
Overhead Cost Method
❑ Yes ® No %
❑ Actual Cost
WBE Participation
❑ Actual Cost Not To Exceed %
❑ Yes ® No %
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
91-1412195
® Fixed Rate 154.7 %
Fixed Fee $ 6,591.70
Do you require a 1099 for IRS?
Completion Date
—
® Yes ❑ No
December 31, 2004
❑ Specific Rates Of Pay
❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate
Total Amount Authorized $ 79,794.76
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
Management Reserve Fund $
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work
Maximum Amount Payable $ 79,794.76
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
between the Local Agency of City of Renton
day of
2003 ,
, Washington, hereinafter called the
"AGENCY", and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore
deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary
services for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State
Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish
Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
DOT Form 140-089 EF Page 1 of 8
Revised 12199
I
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of
the above described work and services as herein
defined and necessary to accomplish the completed
work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall
furnish all services, labor and related equipment
necessary to conduct and complete the work as
designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
II
SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work and project level of effort for this
project is detailed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
III
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All aspects of coordination of the work of this
AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or
individuals shall receive advance approval by the
AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with
agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated
through the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,
progress and presentation meetings with the
AGENCY or such Federal, Community, State, City
or County officials, groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will
provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior
to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation.
The minimum number of hours or days notice —
required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY
and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made part of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly
progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY,
that will outline in written and graphical form the
various phases and the order of performance of the
work in sufficient detail so that the progress of the
work can easily be evaluated. Goals for Disadvan-
taged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women
Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) if required shall
be shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
All reports, PS&E materials, and other data, furnished
to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be
returned. All designs, drawings, specifications,
documents, and other work products prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of
this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this
PROJECT and are property of the AGENCY. Reuse
by the AGENCY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of
service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT,
shall be without liability or legal exposure to the
CONSULTANT.
IV
TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in
writing by the AGENCY. All work under this
AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended
because of any delays attributable to the CONSULT-
ANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY, in the
event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or
because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of
GOD or governmental actions or other conditions
beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior
supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is
required to extend the established completion time.
V
PAYMENT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY
for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "C" attached
hereto, and by this reference made part of this
AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compen-
sation for work performed or services rendered and
for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and
incidentals necessary to complete the work
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work". The
CONSULTANT shall conform with all applicable
portions of 48 CFR 31.
Page 2 of 8
VI
SUBCONTRACTING
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items
of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement.
Compensation for this subconsultant work shall be
based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G, at-
tached hereto and by this reference made a part of this
AGREEMENT.
The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its
maximum amount payable unless a prior written
approval has been issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non -
salary costs and fixed fee costs for the subconsultant
shall be substantiated in the same manner as outlined
in Section V. All subcontracts exceeding $10,000 in
cost shall contain all applicable provisions of this
AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the
performance of any work under this AGREEMENT
without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No
permission for subcontracting shall create, between
the AGENCY and subcontractor, any contract or any
other relationship.
VII
EMPLOYMENT
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not
employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and
that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consider-
ation, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this
warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
this AGREEMENT without liability, or in its discre-
tion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or
consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of
such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift,
or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or
other persons while engaged in the performance of
any work or services required of the CONSULTANT
under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered
employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the
AGENCY, and any and all claims that may or might
arise under any Workmen's compensation Act on
behalf of said employees or other persons while so
engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party
as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services
provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole
obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or
part time basis, or other basis, during the period of the
contract, any professional or technical personnel who
are, or have been, at any time during the period of the
contract, in the employ of the United States Depart-
ment of Transportation, the STATE, or the
AGENCY, except regularly retired employees,
without written consent of the public employer of
such person.
VIII
NONDISCRIMINATION
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate
against any client, employee or applicant for employ-
ment or for services because of race, creed, color,
national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap
except for a bona fide occupational qualification with
regard to, but not limited to the following: employ-
ment upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or
any recruitment advertising, a layoff or terminations,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation, selection
for training, rendition of services. The CONSULT-
ANT understands and agrees that if it violates this
provision, this AGREEMENT may be terminated by
the AGENCY and further that the CONSULTANT
shall be barred from performing any services for the
AGENCY now or in the future unless a showing is
made satisfactory to the AGENCY that discrimina-
tory practices have terminated and that recurrence of
such action is unlikely.
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the
CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and
successors in interest agrees as follows:
A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regula-
tions relative to nondiscrimination in the same
manner as in Federal -assisted programs of the
Page 3 of 8
Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be
amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred
to as the Regulations), which are herein incorpo-
rated by reference and made a part of this
AGREEMENT. The consultant shall comply
with the American Disabilities Act of 1992, as
amended.
B. NONDISCRIMINATION: The CONSULTANT,
with regard to the work performed by it during the
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital
status, national origin or handicap except for a
bona fide occupational qualification in the selec-
tion and retention of subconsultants, including
procurements of materials and leases of equip-
ment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate
either directly or indirectly in the discrimination
prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations,
including employment practices when the contract
covers a program set forth in Appendix II of the
Regulations.
C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS,
INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF MATERI-
ALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made
by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed
under a subcontract, including procurements of
materials or leases of equipment, each potential
subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the
CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's
obligations under this AGREEMENT and the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital
status, national origin and handicap.
D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The
CONSULTANT shall provide all information
and reports required by the Regulations, or
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall
permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as
may be determined by the AGENCY to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations or directives. Where any information
required of the CONSULTANT is in the exclu-
sive possession of another who fails or refuses to
furnish this information the CONSULTANY shall '
so certify to the AGENCY, or the United States
Department of Transportation as appropriate, and
shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain
the information.
E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the
event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance
with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose
such sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration may determine to be appropriate,
including, but not limited to:
1. Withholding of payments to the CONSULT-
ANT under the AGREEMENT until the
CONSULTANT complies, and/or
2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the
AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through (G) in every subcontract,
including procurements of materials and leases of
equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directive's issued pursuant thereto. The CON-
SULTANT shall take such action with respect to
any subconsultant or procurement as the
AGENCY or the Federal Highway Administra-
tion may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompli-
ance; provided, however, that, in the event a
CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is
threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or
supplier as a result of such direction, the CON-
ULTANT may request the AGENCY to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the
AGENCY, and in addition, the CONSULTANT
may request the United States to enter into such
litigation to protect the interests of the United
States.
G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW
49.60.180.
Page 4 of 8
IX
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate
this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten days written
notice to the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the
AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the
CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit F for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed
after ten days following receipt by the CONSULT-
ANT of the Notice to terminate. If the accumulated
payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would
be due computed as set forth herein above, then no
final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT
shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any
excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated
by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CON-
SULTANT, the above formula for payment shall not
apply. In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be
determined by the AGENCY with consideration
given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULT-
ANT in performing the work to the date of
termination, the amount of work originally required
which was satisfactorily completed to date of termina-
tion, whether that work is in a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination;
the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm
to complete the work required and the time which
maybe required to do so, and other factors which
affect the value to the AGENCY of the work per-
formed at the time of termination. Under no
circumstances shall payment made under this subsec-
tion exceed the amount which would have been made
using the formula set forth in the previous paragraph.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULT-
ANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's
failure to perform is without it or it's employee's fault
or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a
termination for the convenience of the AGENCY in
accordance with the provision of this AGREEMENT.
In the event of the death of any member, partner or
officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervi-
sory personnel assigned to the project, or, dissolution
of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or
disaffiliation of the principally involved employee,
the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby
agree to complete the work under the terms of this
AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the
AGENCY. The subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the
surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the
AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in
the previous paragraph, should the surviving members
of the CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY's concur-
rence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,
payment shall be made as set forth in the second
paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY
shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any
remedies of any type it may have against the CON-
SULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by
the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULT-
ANT to perform work required of it by the
AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitle-
ment to exercise those rights with respect to any
future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
X
CHANGES OF WORK
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and
revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT
as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when
required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional
compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it
desirable for its own purposes to have previously
satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof
changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make
such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This
work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be
paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
Page 5 of 8
XI that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to
DISPUTES indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against and
hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE from
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connec-
tion with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT
between the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall
be referred for determination to the Director of Public
Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the
matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this
AGREEMENT, provided however, that if an action is
brought challenging the Director of Public Works or
AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be
subject to de novo judicial review.
XII
VENUE, APPLICABLE LAW AND
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
In the event that either party deems it necessary to
institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any
right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the
parties hereto agree that any such action shall be
initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washing-
ton, situated in the county the AGENCY is located in.
The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be
resolved by application of Washington law and that
the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal
from such decisions of the Superior court in accor-
dance with the laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal
jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of
Washington, situated in the county in which the
AGENCY is located in.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal,
State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This
AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in
accord with the laws of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the
AGENCY and the STATE, and their officers and
employees harmless from and shall process and
defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or
suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from
the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of
its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the
conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their
agents, officers and employees and provided further
that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from
the concurrent negligence of (a) the -
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the
AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and
employees, this indemnity provision with respect to
(1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the
costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of defending
such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid and enforce-
able only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's
negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's
agents or employees.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall
be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential
liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's
own employees against the AGENCY and, solely for
the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the
CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity
under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that this
waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to the
provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the subject of
mutual negotiation.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the
AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject
to the processing of an acceptable, supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide on -call
assistance to the AGENCY during contract adminis-
tration. By providing such assistance, the
CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for:
proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any
construction contractor's failure to perform its work
in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force
during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as other-
wise required, the following insurance with
companies or through sources approved by the State
Insurance Commissioner pursuant to RCW 48.
Page 6 of 8
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability
insurance as required by the STATE.
B. General commercial liability insurance in an
amount not less than a single limit of one million
and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily
injury, including death and property damage
per occurrence.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance and
any professional liability insurance secured by the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all
certificates of insurance as an additional insured. The
CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements required
by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the
right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance
company authorized to do business in the State of
Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a
verification of insurance as outlined above within
14 days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to
the AGENCY.
No cancellation of,the foregoing policies shall be
effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to
the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the
AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable
under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars,
whichever is the greater unless modified by
Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's
professional liability to third parties be limited in
any way.
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments
under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully
complied with this section. This remedy is not exclu-
sive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take
such other action as is available to them under other
provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIV
EXTRA WORK
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order,
make changes within the general scope of the
AGREEMENT in the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease
in the estimated cost of, or the time required for,
performance of any part of the work under this.
AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the
order, or otherwise affects any other terms and
conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY
shall make an equitable adjustment in the
(1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or
completion schedule, or both; and (3) other
affected terms and shall modify the AGREE-
MENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request
for equitable adjustment" (hereafter referred to
as claim) under this clause within 30 days from
the date of receipt of the written order. However,
if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it,
the AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim
submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a
dispute under the Disputes clause. However
nothing in this clause shall excuse the CON-
SULTANT from proceeding with the
AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of
paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum
amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall
not be increased or considered to be increased
except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The CONSULTANT shall place his endorsement on
all plans, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by him.
Page 7 of 8
XVI
FEDERAL AND STATE REVIEW
The Federal Highway Administration and the
Washington State Department of Transportation
shall have the right to participate in the review or
examination of the work in progress.
XVII
CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT
AND THE AGENCY
Attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1", are the
Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency,
Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment,
suspension and other responsibility matters - primary
covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3" Certification
regarding the restrictions of the use of Federal funds
for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4" Certificate of Current
Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibits "A-3" and "A-4" are
only required in Agreements over $100,000.
XVIII
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This document and referenced attachments contains
all covenants, stipulations and provisions agreed upon
by the parties. No agent, or representative of either
party has authority to make, and the parties shall not
be bound by or be liable for, any statement, represen-
tation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No
changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms
hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and
signed by the parties as an amendment to this
AGREEMENT.
XIX
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed
in several counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed to be an original having identical legal effect.
The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all
statements, representations, warranties, covenants,
and agreements contained in the proposal, and the
supporting materials submitted by the CONSULT-
ANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and
agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first
above written.
By By
Consultant W&H Pacific Agency City of Renton
Page 8 of 8
I hereby certify that I am
representative of the firm of
Exhibit A-1
Certification Of Consultant
Principal
W&H Pacific
Project No.
Local Agency City of Renton
and duly authorized
whose address is
3350 Monte Villa Parkway Bothell, WA 98021 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any
firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to
solicit or secure this contract.
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or to retain the services of
any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract.
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution donation or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any):
I further certify that the firm I hereby represent is authorized to do business in the State of Washington and
that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the board of Professional Registration.
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the State Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving'
participation of Federal aid funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
-
Date Signature
Certification of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Renton Washington
and that the above consulting firm or their representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
(b) Pay or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of
any kind, except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid highway funds and it
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date Signature
Exhibit A-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters -Primary Covered Transactions
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public
transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal,
state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph Lb. of this certification;
and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): W&H Pacific
0 7—_0 3
(Date) (Sig re) President or Authorized Official of Consultant
Exhibit A-3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with
the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard
Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and
that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm): W&H Pacific
�o Z7- 3
(Date) ' nature) Preside or Authorized Official of Consulta t
Exhibit A-4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to verify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Apron C Utilities Proj. - Electrical Conversion
* are accurate, complete, and current as of **. This certification includes
the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm
Name
Title Principal
Date of Execution***
* Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.).
** Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
*** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
EXHIBIT B-1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2003 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADES — BOEING CONVERSION
Description of Project
The City of Renton proposes the following improvements to the Renton Municipal Airport:
1. Disconnect power service connections from the existing Boeing -owned power system for select
locations on the west side of the Renton Municipal Airport. Locations include -the airport
maintenance building, buildings 800 and 820, the existing restroom facility, and the ramp lighting
servicing the tiedowns accessed through Gate V-4.
2. Obtain new power service connections from Puget Sound Energy (PSE) to supply power to the
facilities removed from the Boeing -owned power system.
3. Assist the airport in providing anticipated power demands (loads) to PSE for future hangar
facilities on the ramp adjacent to Gate C-6 and Boeing Ramp B at the south end of the airport.
PSE will use this information to develop a future distribution system sizing for west perimeter
road.
4. Obtain temporary PSE power service connection to Building 790 (Quanset Hut) & 800 allowing
the building to be leased by the City prior to PSE completing the full upgrades to convert all
facilities.
Scope of Services
The Consultant shall provide the following Specified Services for the Project as described below. All
engineering work shall be performed using accepted engineering principles and practices and shall
provide quality products that meet orexceed industry standards.
Design Phase Services
The Consultant shall provide the following services during the design phase of this project.
1: Attend pre -design meeting with City, Airport and PSE personnel. Finalize work scope and
schedule. Assemble and review existing maps, plans, documents, reports and other available
information. Conduct a site visit by key project staff, take photos, and become familiar with
existing conditions.
2. Provide project management and administration, liaison with the City, prepare monthly progress
reports and/or invoices, attend monthly meeting with City staff and manage subconsultants for
the design phase services.
3. Review project site and document locations of existing connections from Boeing -owned power
system to the airport maintenance building, buildings 800 and 820, the existing restroom facility,
and the ramp lighting servicing the tiedowns accessed through Gate V-4. Locate known existing
Boeing -owned power supply components within project area, including power service
connections to the above facilities and the substation serving those facilities
I:\Projects\City of Renton\000000 BD Efforts\Renton Airport Electrical scope 09-1 M3.doc
- B_1. 1 - September 18, 2003
4. Develop building load requirements for the airport maintenance building, buildings 800 and 810,
the existing restroom facility, the ramp lighting servicing the tiedowns accessed through Gate V-
4, future hangar facilities on the ramp adjacent to Gate V-4, and future hangar facilities on
Boeing Ramp B at the south end of the airport. Develop phasing scenarios for future power
service requirements.
5. Attend up to three (3) meetings with City staff, Airport Staff, Boeing, and PSE to coordinate the
removal of the Boe.ing-owned power system components as necessary and installation of PSE's
new power system. Removal of Boeing -owned equipment will be completed by The Boeing
Company.
6. Prepare preliminary construction plans. See Exhibit B-2 for estimated sheet count.
7. Prepare preliminary contract documents and technical specifications. Construction contract
documents shall be City of Renton standard contract documents. Technical specifications shall
be FAA technical specifications, WSDOT technical specifications, or AIA technical specifications
as appropriate.
8. Provide recommendations for construction phasing.
9. Prepare preliminary construction cost estimates.
10.. Distribute preliminary plans, contract documents, and technical specifications for the 30 percent,
60 percent, and 90 percent completion of the design elements of the project. Solicit comments
on preliminary design from City personnel, airport personnel and PSE.
11. Incorporate preliminary design comments and respond as necessary to requests for additional
information. Finalize construction plans, documents, specifications, contract conditions and
associated forms. Prepare final quantity calculations and Engineer's Estimate.
12. Submit final plans, contract documents, and technical specifications for review and approval by
the City.
13. Publish one original set of contract documents.
Construction Phase Services
1. Provide project management and administration, liaison with the City, prepare monthly progress
reports and/or invoices, attend monthly meeting with City staff and manage subconsultants for
the construction phase services.
2. Assist the City with interpretation of project requirements and answer contractor requests for
clarifications in the form of addenda as necessary during bidding. Assist with pre -bid conference
and bid opening. Review and tabulate the bids and make recommendation for award. The City
will send award notification to successful bidder, notify and return bid bonds to the unsuccessful
bidders.
3. Prepare for and lead pre -construction conference meeting. Prepare meeting minutes and
distribute to attendees.
IAProjects\City of Renton\000000 BD Efforts\Renton Airport Electrical scope 09-18-03.doc
- B-1.2 - September 18, 2003
9
Review Contractor submittals.
Conduct weekly project site meetings with the Contractor, City staff, airport staff, and others
associated with the project construction.
6. Provide a resident project representative who will provide on -site observation as needed during
the construction. Monitor and document construction progress. Prepare daily activity reports
when on -site. Review the Contractor's compliance with permit requirements. Estimate monthly
pay quantities for agreement with the Contractor. Conduct periodic Labor Wage Rate
interviews.
7. Provide construction administration, including preparation of change orders, if required,
preparation and submittal of weekly inspection reports, and preparation of construction pay
estimates for City approval and processing. Prepare any letters relative to construction
scheduling requirements and letters acknowledging substantial completion and final completion
for City approval. Review and provide written recommendation for Contractor claims. Solicit
Notice of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wage and Affidavit of Wages Paid from the Contractor. Solicit
Contractor's Certified Payrolls each week and conduct general reviews for compliance.
Compare periodic Labor Wage Rate interviews with certified payrolls.
8. Conduct a final inspection with City staff, Airport staff, and the Contractor.
9. Prepare record drawings.
10. Update the City of Renton's electronic basemap of the airport to reflect improvements
constructed for this project.
Assumptions
• No boundary survey is included in this item.
• A NPDES construction permit is not required. Land disturbance shall be less than 5 acres.
• The City will prepare and obtain all permits as required, including shoreline and floodplain
permits.
• The City will make all necessary duplicates of the original construction plans, contract
documents, and technical specifications.
• The City will provide W&H Pacific with all available as -built information, past reports, maps,
contract documents and specifications for the project.
• Construction to occur in the fall/winter of 2003/2004.
• Construction observation fee estimate is based on estimated construction duration of 45
calendar days.
• Resident Engineering based on one site visit per week.
• The City will distribute contract documents to interested bidders and plan centers. The City will
also coordinate the advertising and maintain plan holder's list.
• A maximum of two (2) addenda will be necessary during the course of bidding.
• The. City will provide the existing electronic basemap and red -line as-builts for the project to
W&H Pacific to prepare the updated basemap and record drawings at the completion of
construction.
• Contractor to obtain City and State electrical permits as required.
l:\Projects\City of Renton\000000 BD Efforts\Renton Airport Electrical scope 09-18-03.doc
- B-1- 3.-
September 18, 2003
EXHIBIT B-2
W&H PACIFIC
ESTIMATED PLAN SHEETS
FOR
RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2003 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADES — BOEING CONVERSION
Sheet Number
Description
1
Cover Sheet.
2
Construction Site Plan
3
Construction Phasing/Safety Plan
4
Civil Details/Plans
5
Electrical One -Line Diagrams
6
Electrical One -Line Diagrams
7
Electrical Details
8
Electrical Details
9
Electrical Details
1:\Projects\City of Renton\000000 BD Efforts\Renton Airport Electrical scope 09-15-03.doe
- B-2-1 - October 17, 2003
Exhibit C-2
Payment
(Cost Plus Fixed Fee)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or
services rendered and for all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work .
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48
CFR 31.
A. Actual Costs
Payment for all consulting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT's actual cost
plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost.
1. Direct Salary Costs
The direct salary cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel
for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.
2. Overhead Costs
Overhead costs are those costs other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the
CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the
rate shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT, under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total
overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT. The three
options are explained as follows:
a. Actual Cost Not To Exceed Maximum Percent: If this method is indicated in the heading of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT at the actual overhead rate
verified by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment
when accumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to
reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change
during the life of the AGREEMENT.
A summary of the CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as
Exhibit D-1 and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the
Actual Cost Not To Exceed method is used, the CONSULTANT (prime and all subconsultants) will
submit to the AGENCY within three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead
schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose
of adjusting the overhead rate for billing purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress
payments during the following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to
reflect the actual rate.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime consultant or any of the subconsultants shall
cause the agency to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required
information is received and an overhead. rate for billing purposes is approved.
The STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit.of the CONSULTANT's books and
records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. Direct Nonsalary Costs
Direct nonsalary costs.will be reimbursed at the actual cost to the CONSULTANT. These charges may
include, but are not limited to the following items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies,
computer charges, and fees of subconsultants. Air or train travel will only be reimbursed to economy class
levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. Automobile mileage for travel will be reimbursed at
the current rate approved for AGENCY employees and shall be supported by the date and time of each trip
with origin and destination of such trips. Subsistence and lodging expenses will be reimbursed at the same
rate as for AGENCY employees. The billing for nonsalary cost, directly identifiable with the Project, shall
be an itemized listing of the charges supported by copies of original bills, invoices, expense accounts, and
miscellaneous supporting data retained by the CONSULTANT. Copies of the original supporting
documents shall be provided to the AGENCY upon request. All of the above charges must be necessary
for the services to be provided under this AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee
The fixed fee, which represents the CONSULTANT's profit, is shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any additional fixed fee which could be
authorized from the Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the scope of work defined in this
AGREEMENT and the estimated man -months required to perform the stated scope of work. In the event
a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the CONSULTANT, the supplemental
agreement may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The fixed fee will
be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT
and reported in the monthly progress reports accompanying the invoices.
Any portion of the fixed fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the
final payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX, Termination of Agreement.
5. Management Reserve Fund
The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement
Administrator the flexibility of authorizing additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable
unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in
this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $50,000
or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount
included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this agreement. This fund may be
replenished in a subsequent supplemental agreement. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of
the "Management Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance with Section XIV, "Extra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amount Payable
The maximum total amount payable, by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT,
shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the
Fixed Fee and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include
payment for extra work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work."
B. Monthly Progress Payments
The CONSULTANT may submit invoices to the AGENCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the
calculated overhead and fee not more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such
invoices shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports
required under Section III, General Requirements, of this AGREEMENT. The invoices will be supported by
an itemized listing for each item including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to
which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist
of recording the names, titles, and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the
time of the interview.
C. Final Payment
Final payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly
upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT,
contingent upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are
required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the
CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment which the CONSULTANT may have
against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the
AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar
to any claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the
appropriateness of any item and that at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and
reflected in a final payment. In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the
CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within ninety (90)
days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any
claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment.
D. Inspection of Cost Records
The CONSULTANT and the subconsultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the
AGENCY and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and
accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the
following exception: if any litigation, claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this
contract is initiated before the expiration of the three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be
retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
Exhibit D-3
Consultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Fee Schedule
PROJECT TITLE: RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - APRON C UTILITIES PROJECT - ELECTRICAL CONVERSION 27-Oct-03
CLIENT: CITY OF RENTON
PHASE: CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
JOB NUMBER:
LABOR:
Project
Civil
Resident
Project
Task
Principal
Manager
Engineer
Engineer
Technician
Coord.
Clerical
Total
Labor
No. Task (Scope of Services)
44.00
38.50
33.00
32.00
24.00
20.00
18.00
Hours
Cost
I Project Management
4
24
0
0
0
24
0
52
1,580.00
2 Pre -bid, Bid Opening, rec award
1
8
8
0
0
0
2
19
652.00
3 Pre-Constntction Meeting
0
4
4
0
0
0
2
10
322.00
4 Review submittals
1
4
8
0
0
0
4
17
534.00
5 Weekly project meetings (6 meetings)
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
24
924.00
6 Resident Engineering
Electrical
Subconsultant
0
0.00
7 Construction Administration
2
16
24
0
0
0
8
50
1,640.00
8 Conduct a final inspection
0
4
4
4
0
0
4
16
486.00
9 Prepare record drawings
0
1
8
8
16
0
0
33
942.50
10 Update Basemap
0
1
4
0
8
0
2
15
398.50
Labor Subtotal
8
86
60
12
24
24
22
236
7,479.00
Overhead (154,70%)
11,570.01
Fixed Fee (15%)
2,857.35
TOTAL LABOR
21,906.36
EXPENSES:
Cost
Expenses
Item
Quantity
Unit
per Unit
Markup
Cost
Mileage
1000
Miles
0.40
1.0
400.00
Per Diem
0
Day
125.00
1.0
0.00
Technology Charge
236
Hr
5.00
1.0
1,180.00
TOTAL EXPENSES
1,580.00
SUBCONSULTANTS:
Subcontract Subcon.
Amount Markup Cost
Electrical Subconsultant 7,500.00 1.1 8 250.00
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS 8,250.00
Total - Labor 21,906.36
Total - Expenses 1,580.00
Total - Subconsultants 8,250.00
TOTAL- CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 31,736.36
TOTAL - Design and Construction Phase Services $79,794.76
PROJECTTITLE: RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - APRON C UTILITIES PROJECT - ELECTRICAL CONVERSION 27-Oct-03
CLIENT.- CITY OF RENTON
PHASE: DESIGN PHASE SERVICES
LABOR:
Task /
Sheet N Task (Scope of Services)
Principal
44.00
Project
Manager
38.50
Civil
Engineer
33.00
Designer/ Project
Surveyor Technician Coord.
26.00 24.00 20.00
Clerical
18.00
Total
Hours
Labor
Cost
I Predesign Meeting & Seeping
2
8
8
0 0
4 4
26
812.00
2 Project Management and Administration
2
32
0
0 0
20 0
54
1,720.00
3 Site Review for Electrical Requirements
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
4 Future Building Load Calculations
4
8
Electrical Subconsultant
12
418 00
5 Coordination Meetings
2
12
12
0 0
0 0
26
946.00
6 Preliminary Construction Plans
Cover Sheet
0
0
2
0 4
0 0
6
162.00
Construction Site Plan
0
2
16
0 16
0 0
34
989.00
Construction Safety/Phasing Plan
0
2
8
0 16
0 0
26
725.00
Civil Details/Plans
0
2
16
0 16
0 0
34
989.00
One Line Diagrams
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
One Line Diagrams
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
Electrical Details
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
Electrical Details
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
Electrical Details
Electrical Subconsultant
0
0.00
7 Preliminary Contract Does & Technical Specs
0
4
8
0 0
0 16
28
706.00
8 Construction Phasing Plan
0
2
4
0 0
0 4
10
281.00
9 Preliminary Cost Estimates
0
2
4
0 4
0 4
14
377.00
10 Distribute & Review Preliminary Documents
2
4
0
0 0
4 0
10
322.00
11 Finalize Plans, Specs, Const Does & Estimates
2
4
8
0 16
0 8
38
1,034.00
17 Final Submittal & Approval
0
1
0
0 0
1 0
2
58.50
18 Publish Contract Documents
0
2
2
2 0
2 0
8
235.00
Labor Subtotal 10 81 96 2 72 31 36 328 9,774.50
Overhead (154.70%) 15,121.15
Fixed Fee (15%) 3,734.35
TOTAL LABOR 28,630.00
EXPENSES:
Cost
Expenses
Item
Quantity
Unit
per Unit
Markup
Cost
Mileage
600
Miles
0.40
1.0
240.00
Per Diem
0
Day
125.00
1.0
0.00
Technology Charge
328
Hr
5.00
1.0
1,640.00
Plotting/Printing
40
Each
3.00
1.0
120.00
TOTAL EXPENSES
2,000.00
SUBCONSULTANTS:
Subcontract
Subcon.
Amount
Markup
Cost
Electrcial Subconsultant
15,844.00
11
17 428.40
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS
17,428.40
Total - Labor 28,630.00
Total - Expenses 2,000.00
Total - Subconsultants 17,428.40
TnTA1.- nFC1f_NPHdCRCFRV1rV.q 48.058.40
Exhibit E
r
O C
w LL
W 'D
C V O
O
m a
U O
0 2 1
IX to a.
o o
U v N
F W
m y,
�. LL
m C
> O
O,.
R
O
a
0
U
F-
c
O
m
M
IC
to
Breakdown of Overhead Cost
m
N
W
m
O
O
L
L
J
N
U
i)
O
m
0
C
p
CD
m
>
O
C
G)
O
m
E
m
CD
m
Q
�
m
O
a
Q
m
m
m
m
N
O
CD
v
a
N
L
Q
cc
0)
C
m
O
-Em
>
0
cc
a)m
m
m
>
O
O)
Q
C
p
qS
V
LL
i
C7
N
OO
O
OD
U
N
N
r4
F-
O
L
o
F-
0
^ M O 0 W m W r- m n e
riuiriC66W m ^
rn co f- n N LO O^ co � LO
ri o v ' Oi o r) m ri
r) sT ^ N O r) v O
0 0 0
CD t0 O
p N r)
M ^
m
O Vl
f4 O V O
fO t N O J m m
-Ep
-0? O j 0 U m N L
_.]. LL j 0 7 p p 0 J s
a) Q ~ N i4 ` m
p ti = C7 � F- 6 0
IT Corporation
Overhead Rate Calculation
Based on IT Corporation FY 2000 Proposed Final Indirect Cost Rates
Amount
Percent
Direct Labor Base
133,701.7
Overhead Costs:
Salaries & Wages
32,176.9.
24.07%
Facilities Allocation
25,998.6
19.45%
Paid Personal Absences
17,151.8
12.83%
B&P Costs
15,235.6
11.40%
Payroll Tax Expense
15,061.8
11.27%
Health & Welfare
10,732.3
8.03%
Current Period Restructuring Costs
9,541.0.-
7.14%
Indirect Sub / O/S Services
5,975.0
4.47%
Pension & Profit. Sharing
5,075.9
3.80%
Restructuring Amortization
4,487.8
3.36%
Environmental Costs
4,349.2
3.25%
Computer Allocation
3,849.2
2.88%
Insurance Allocation
2,500.7
1.87%
Legal Fees
2,293.6
1.72%
Incentive Compensation
1,992.1
1.49%
Workers Compensation
1,824.7
1.36%
Depreciation
1,782.5
1.33%
General Supplies
1,524.4
1.14%
Telephone
1,448.0
1.08%
G&A Departmental Costs
1,299.0
0.97%
Temporary Personnel
967.7
0.72%
Relocation
760.4
0.57%
Franchise/Excise/State Income Tax
729.4
0.55%
Prof Sery / Consultants
724.6
0.54%
Employee Physicals
646.9
0.48%
Air Travel
628.7
0.47%
Indirect Materials
611.7
0.46%
Facility Costs
585.3
0.44%
Bank Fees / Audit Fees
554.6
0.41 %
Corporate Project Support Adj
554.5
0.41 %
Postage & Delivery
516.7
0.39%
Restricted Stock / Loan Program
495.5
0.37%
O/S Lease
489.6
0.37%
R&M Equipment
362.4
0.27%
Board of Directors Fees
301.4
0.23%
Business Meals
295.4
0.22%
Educational Assistance
282.0
0.21 %
Ground Transportation
280.5
0.21 %
Memberships & Dues
277.1
0.21 %
IT Corporation
Overhead Rate Calculation
Based on IT Corporation FY 2000 Proposed Final Indirect Cost Rates
Amount
Percent
Lodging
258.7
0.19%
Repro Service Center Variance
164.4
0.12%
Advertising
160.7
0.12%
Indirect Equipment
151.3
0.11 %
Personnel Advertising
109.3
0.08%
Per Diem / Individual Meals
101.6
0.08%
Conference & Seminar
92.8
0.07%
Permits, Fees, License
89.2
0.07%
Auto Allowance
82.1
0.06%
Training
43.3
0.03%
Gain / Loss
38.1
0.03%
Reproduction Costs
37.6
0.03%
Business Tax / Sales Tax Exp
31.1
0.02%
Data Processing
24.7
0.02%
Waste Disposal
4.0
0.00%
Laundry
1.0
0.00%
Publications
0.0
0.00%
Other Travel Expense
(1.5)
0.00%
Discount Eamed
(3.4)
0.00%
Miscellaneous Income
(3.4)
0.00%
Other General Expenses
(65.9)
-0.05%
HITS
(1,000.0)
-0.75%
IT Corp Home Office Allocations:
Corporate MIS
9,108.5
6.81 %
Regional Accounting
6,213.6
4.65%
Business Development
5,111.7
3.82%
Corporate Indirect / Other
1,209.7
0.90%
Regional Human Resources
1,198.8
0.90%
Legal Dept
1,054.9
0.79%
Corporate Human Resources
1,006.7
0.75%
Corporate Disbursements
849.9
0.64%
.Corporate Accounting
792.7
0.59%
Corporate Facilities Mgmt
742.7
0.56%
Corporate Business Develop
648.0
0.48%
Government Compliance
503.3
0.38%
Treasury Department
301.4
0.23%
Corporate Procurement
259.2
0.19%
Techncial Development
36.2
0.03%
IT Group Home Office. Allocations:
CEO
831.9
0.62%
IT Corporation
Overhead Rate Calculation
Based on IT Corporation FY 2000 Proposed Final Indirect Cost Rates
Amount
Percent
Tax Department
415.9
0.31 %
Corporate Communications
391.8
0.29%
Board of Directors
322.5
0.24%
Strategic Planning & Marketing
301.4
0.23%
internal Audit
277.3
0.21 %
Corp Finance & Planning
247.1
0.18%
Risk Management
211.0
0.16%
Corporate Administration
90.4
0.07%
Total Overhead Costs
206,806.9
154.68%
Exhibit F
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT:
ElcoaAss ociates_wilLprovide-electricatdesigns,
Estimate for Engineering Services
ELCON ASSOCIATES,
INC.
Project: Renton Airport Power Transfer
ENGINEERS - CONSULTANTS
Client No:
Elcon No: 7030-S307C
Phase:
Labor and Expense Summary
Revision:
Labor
Hours
Dollars
Labor Category
Rate
EXPENSES:
Principal
$150
1
$150
Travel
$100
Project Manager
$134
20
$2,680
Senior Engineer
$117
64
$7,488
Photographs
Engineer
$96
40
$3,840
Senior Designer
$87
Xerox Reproduction
Designer/Jr. Engineer
$80
Senior CADD
$80
Mylar Plots
CADD Operator
$69
16
$1,104
Sr. Secretary/ Accountant
$69
Fax Transmissions
Clerk/Secretary
$54
8
$432
Postage, Courier
$50
[Subtotal
Computer usage
Project Labor:
149
$15,694
Other
Subtotal Expenses:
$150
Subtotal Project Labor:
$15, 694
Total Estimated Fee:
$15,844.
Fee Pi �pjsal elcon 7 30.03.xis Page 1 of 1 Printed: 10/17/2003
Estimate for Engineering Services ELCON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project: Renton Airport Power Transfer ENGINEERS- CONSULTANTS
Client No:
Elcon No: 7030-S307C
Phase: Budgeted Labor By Category in Manhours
Revision:
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Project
Senior
Senior
FDesigner
Senior
CADD
Sr. Sec.
Pririci al
Manager
Engineer
Engineer
Designer
n
CADD
Operator
Account
Clerical
Total
1. Administration
1
2. Site Visit & Project Familiarization
16
8
4
5
3. Building(s) Load Verification
16
24
4. Develop Scenarios
16
16
16
5. Meetings
16
32
6. Develop Construction Plans
16
162
7. Develop Technical Specifications
2
16
16
34
8.
4
22
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Total Labor Hours:
11
201
64
40
16
8
149
Fee Proposal elcon 7 30 03.xIS Page 1 of 1 Printori• 1n/17/?nnz
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #:
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board Utility Systems Division
November 10, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact Abdoul Gafour, x7210
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Acceptance of deed of dedication for additional right-of-way
near 1300 block of N. 34th St in Kennydale
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Deed of dedication
Study Sessions......
Exhibit map
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Expenditure Required
N/A
Transfer/Amendment N/A
Amount Budgeted
N/A
Revenue Generated N/A
Total Project Budget
N/A
City Share Total N/A
Account No.
Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests Council's acceptance of a deed of
dedication for additional right-of-way.
The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a 20-foot wide x 227-foot long (4,540
square -feet) strip of land located north of N. 34''' St. between Park Ave N. and Meadow Ave. N.
Residents have been using the existing gravel road for access off N. 34`' St. The west half of the
road is within existing right-of-way and the east half is within private property owned by Mr.
Daniel Dahlquist. Mr. Dahlquist agreed to convey the east half of the road to the City at no cost.
The City Maintenance Department has recently paved the road in conjunction with the replacement
of an existing water line. The City also uses the road to maintain an existing sewer line.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the deed of dedication.
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utilit3\WTR-03 - Correspondence\N34thSt-agenda bill for deed-of-dedication.doc\AGtp
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 3342103165
Project File #: Street Intersection:
N. 34th St between Park Ave N. and Meadow Ave N.
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. DANIEL N. DAHLQUIST 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page )
The East 20 feet of the West 40 feet of the South 227.75 feet of Tract 26 C.D. Hillman's
Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1 as recorded
in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 63, Records of King County, Washington.
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as
named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Approved and Accepted By:
Grantor(s): { Grantee(s): City of Renton
(�. Mayor
i
City Clerk
INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING �A
�.dw o.� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1.' an fc? V ( /
Not n box V Gk h l V-(S signed this instrument and
Xacknowledged ' o b l isJ er/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
a °
JO
PUBLO
Nota blic mi nd for the State of Washington
� Notary (Prnt) ' Fy�Y "�.. My appointment expires: 11a
Dated: 0 C-4 , <.), 0�
Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/dahlquist-deed-of-dedication.doc\ a Page 1 FORM 04 000l/bh
Map Exhibit
n A FORAMI nY SW 4/a o> Sly'3-2,<2419 5
36TH ST.
o Ne9 —ozE fsF�
5�-.77
60 G5 4A 40 Go 1157 /4G
lot t lot 2 OQ5 6
1
-
�I� Ic¢Q Pp�o� d
/oe 3 Q —rid 30
lot 3 ' lot 4
Q
iP ul Goa°
100�`� �14.4 ov
��a � , a
too
a 9 3
1➢
,a ' D
o
/a7O In
Zo' 3,5
y90
/cg
,ZB. 5^
,ZB-55022
N
2
&a
2 —
h
��91DAo
1
V
� H n o� 5p �
6 2 ^ 12 B 313ty ��
_
9 �
/5231yti
N
t 9O
O
/28.50 n h 33
Z �03j39
352� o
^ '9
3 n 11j �j\
N N l0
v N
1h 31d\ 3,A
o 14 ^ m m
/z8.50 /zB.5o
/52 G5 40 40
W
�
Q
5o
n 1� n
a
1 1500,y9
25 232
O n
1 PRO s
n
'� 110
3
-
P.lolu 2�, \�5
25 /5
1)'
Y
75_
'0Cp�C0.t10N 3
—
/4l /i&
�ni am
m
9 1 �3
- cr
d
20
—
9
z
-
9 ,�
/4r 217
e
D4
Y 2 6 3(r
0
25
N86-42-ozE
h
I1 1�4 $
3
Z50
20 3159
PCL.1 4 I 9 0
REN SP11O-77
^
N
— — —
7/
4
?
//(o
NB8'42-p2E —
7802270792 Q
o-.
°�
Iv N 0o I
10 ^I 452 2 !to 1
o
1^ g1
L5d o` �5� yl
PCL.2ae0 ^ I s1�5
0
85311v3 31� 311a
t,a
151 wa i�o �1 .
3 3 �}
_
d 3t16 311
/4/ d�
ZD
_
71 7/ 75
bo Go 2 9 >,
o RENSP062-81 N. 34TH ST.
8109249005
5 69-o4-OZE
107 qo Go
n/B9. o2-9oE r5-P ��� \,
58.50 3D /pB.SO /Z7.94
�
v
Lot B ti J�IZD
� �I
8 Ir0 o y 40
v1
0 1
�1 ml o LOT A
I� oog
N 313 ON0
98.$0--� � v�^` h�
/95.9/
�p
I ti15
Fasosbo OEDSLAllOU `ice cm o� pEkt3tJ fait/
t2i6hi-6f-ulK! uS�
"r, 5 5 5 s& u acre-1^'G^EC
Heorms/xxxFRM/AGREE/dahlquist-deed-of-dedication.doc\ a Page 3 FORM 04 0001/bh
s 1 s
of
y5
r i -' � `�`^ -, �.•ye � � . `R � '� � .-emu. �'
N
Al
..;z
t Y �t r g
45
iL,
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division
Staff Contact...... Abdoul Gafour, x7210
Subject:
CAG- 97-139, Maplewood Well 12 Well Head
Construction WTR-27-2279
Contractor: Omega Contractors, Inc.
Exhibits:
Final Pay Estimate
Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract
Al k:
For Agenda of:
11 / 10/2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
KI
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept...... X
Other.....
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required
Amount Budgeted
Total Project Budget
$207.60
(Final Pay Estimate)
Account: 421.500.18.596.34.65.55005
$500 (in 2003)
$400,000 for well head construction
(1997-2003)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Transfer/Amendment
Revenue Generated
City Share Total
The project started on March 19, 1997, and was completed on June 30, 2003.
N/A
N/A
$207.60 (final payment)
Although the contractor, Omega Contractors Inc., substantially completed the construction of the new
wellhead on December 8, 1998, the City did not accept the final project because of the presence of a
contaminant found in the well water. Before putting the new well in service, the Water Utility
performed water quality tests of the well water and the results of the tests showed the presence of a
contaminant (methylene chloride) in the well water.
After several years of cleaning the well by pumping the contaminated raw water to waste, cleaning the
equipment used in the well, and performing many rounds of water quality testing, the source of the
contaminant was determined to be coming from the electrical cable attached to the submersible pump in
the well. The contractor has recently replaced the cable and subsequent water quality tests confirmed
that the contaminant has been removed from the well. The contaminated water was never pumped into
the City's water system.
The original contract amount was $335,465.40 and the final contract amount is $335,041.17.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that
Council accept the project, approve the final pay estimate and approve release of retainage after 60
days, subject to receipt of all required authorizations.
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2279 - Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction\General
Correspondence\AcceptanceAgendaBill . doc\Agtp\tb
� TO:
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR
C "'ITRACTOR: Omega Contractors, Inc.
TRACT NO. CAG 97-139
ESTIMATE NO. 8 (& Final)
PROJECT: Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction-W-2279 Closing Date: 10/27/03
1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $200.00
2. SALES TAX @ 8.80% $17.60
3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $217.60
4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $292,893.55
5. ' EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $190.00
6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS
8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE
9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE
$15,415.45
$10.00
$293,083.55
$15,425.45
10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID (8.6% in 1998)) $26,514.57
11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE (8.8% in 2003) $17.60
12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX $26,532.17
(95% x LINE 1)
** (RETAINAGE: 5%) GRAND TOTAL: $335,041.17
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION:
RENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11):
ACCOUNT # 421/500/18.596.34.65/55005/55009/5460
RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8):
ACCOUNT # 421/500/18.596.34.65/55005/55009/5460
$207.60 # 8 (& Final)
$10.00 # 8 (& Final)
$207.60
$10.00
TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $217.60
CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965
CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION Am
1, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF
PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE Lupy
SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID
OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM
AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM
Signed: 6(Av �o�t�un/ oorDuty 96, 2063
9 /yt j 0. 2g Q '>
M (c . 2 8 3
Printed On: 10/28/2003
City of Renton Public Works Department
Page 1
q, STA7, State of Washington Reg.No.:
i O
oDepartment of Revenue
6 x Audit Procedures & Administration Date:
PO Box 47474
Olympia, Washington 98504-7474
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
From:
City of Renton
Finance Department
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Assigned To
Date Assigned
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below.
Description of Contract
CAG 97-139 Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction (WTR-27-2279)
Contractor's Name
Omega Contractors, Inc.
Telephone No. (425) 881-1697
Contractor's Address
P.O. Box 430 — Duvall, WA 98019 — Ph: 425-881-1697
Date Work Commenced
March 19, 1997
Date Work Completed
June 30, 2003
Date Work Accepted
November 10, 2003
Surety or Bonding Co.
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Agent's Address
P.O. Box 1227 — Baltimore, MD 21203-1227
Richard D. Rechkoff- Bellevue, WA.
Contract Amount:
Addit+ARS AF Reductions:
Sales Tax:
Total
$308,900.00
- $391.00
$26,532.17
$335,041.17
By
Phone No:
Amount Disbursed: $319,615.72
Amount Retained: $15,425.45
Total:
(Disbursing Officer)
$335,041.17
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington
98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM
RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate.
FORM REV 310020 (12-92)
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2279- Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction\General
Correspondence\NoticeOfCompletion.doc\AGtp
Printed On.-,10/28/2003
City of Renton Public WorF
Project:
Maplewood Well 12 Well Head Construction-W-2279
'ractor: Omega Contractors, Inc.
Pay Estimate
8 (& Final)
,em
Description
Unit
Est.
Unit
No.
Quantity
Price
001.
Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Prep & Cleanup
Lump Sum
1
$4,000.00
002.
Site Work
Lump Sum
1
$25,000.00
003.
Structural
Lump Sum
1
$31,000.00
004.
Finishes
Lump Sum
1
$3,000.00
Pump and Motor (based on a J-Line/Hitachi" pump and
005.
motor
Lump Sum
1
$75.900.00
006.
Mechanical
Lump Sum
1
$17.000.00
007.
Electrical
Lump Sum
1
$118,000.00
008.
Shoring
Lump Sum
1
$3,000.00
009.
Chemical Injection System
Lump Sum
1
$10,000.00
010.
Underground Utilities
Lump Sum
1
$10,000.00
011.
Landscaping Restoration
Lump Sum
1
$12,000.00
Change Order No. 1 Electrical system (using Siemens) and
12.
Delete bid item No. 7
Lump Sum
1
$105,000.00
013.
Change Order No. 2 - Additional extra work
Lump Sum
1
$12,609.00
Subtotal
8.6 % Sales Tax (8.8% in 2003)
TT
Total
s Department Page 1
Contract Number:
CAG 97-139
Closing Dale:
101272003
Previous
Previous
This
This
Total
Total
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
0.95
$3,800.00
0.05
$200.00
1.00
$4.000.00
1.00
$25,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$25,000.00
1.00
$31,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$31,000.00
1.00
$3,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$3,000.00
1.00
$75,900.00
$0.00
1.00
$75,900.00
1.00
$17.000.00
$0.00
1.00
$17,000.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$3,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$3,000.00
1.00
$10,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$10,000.00
1.00
$10,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$10,000.00
1.00
$12,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$12,000.00
1.00
$105,000.00
$0.00
1.00
$105,000.00
1.00
$12,609.00
$0.00
1.00
$12,609.00
$308,309.00
$200.00
$308,509.00
$26,514.57
$17.60
$26,532.17
$334,823.57
$217.60
$335,041.17
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #: S r M ,
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board Utility Systems Division
November 10, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact Abdoul Gafour, x7210
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Addendum No. 3 to CAG-02-010 Engineering Consultant
Correspondence..
Agreement with Economic and Engineering Services for
Ordinance .............
Design of Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue paper
Study Sessions......
Addendum No. 3 to CAG-02-010
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other ..............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required
Amount Budgeted
Total Project Budget
Account No.
N/A
$90,000
$100,000 (in 2003)
$1,168,000 (2002-2003 total design
contract including addenda # 1 to #3)
$1,200,000 (2002-2003 total budget
for design contract)
421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.55562
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Transfer/Amendment N/A
Revenue Generated N/A
City Share Total $90,000
Project (for Add.#3)
The Water Utility section requests approval of Addendum # 3 to the consultant contract
CAG-02-010 in the amount of $90,000 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES).
The addendum is needed to cover additional design work for the Maplewood Water Treatment
Facility that was not anticipated in the original contract.
There are sufficient funds in the 2003 Water Utility Capital Improvement Project budget to cover
this addendum to the contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute Addendum #3 to CAG-02-010, in the total amount of $90,000 with
Economic and Engineering Services, Inc.
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements\Design Contract with
EES and KJ\Addendum #3\agenda bill for contract addendum 3.doc\AGtp
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 27, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Gregg ZimrnermanrAlrministrator
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, x7210
SUBJECT: Addendum No. 3 to CAG-02-010 Engineering Consultant
Agreement with Economic and Engineering Services for
Additional Design of Maplewood Water Treatment Facility
ISSUE:
The Water Utility section requests approval of Addendum # 3 in the amount of $90,000 to the
consultant contract CAG 02-010 with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES). The
addendum is needed to cover additional design work for the Maplewood Water Treatment
Facility that was not anticipated in the original contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
• The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the
addendum and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Addendum #3 to
CAG-02-010, in the total amount of $90,000 with EES.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City entered into consultant agreement CAG-02-010 with Economic and Engineering
Services, Inc. (EES), on January 17, 2002, to design the water treatment improvements for
the Maplewood wells including the design of a new parking lot at the Maplewood Golf
Course and netting improvements.
Page 2
Consultant's cost for additional design work for the shoring system $51,000
As the design development for the project progressed to the 95 % completion level, the
relative complexity of the project increased because of unforeseen geotechnical conditions.
The consultant performed extensive additional designs for the shoring system for the new
facility to protect the existing water pump station and to minimize impact to the golf course
facilities and operations. In order to ensure that all project requirements were clearly
understood by prospective bidders and to minimize the potential for costly change orders,
during the construction of the project, the City requested extensive involvement by the
consultant in the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) review and revisions of the final
plans and specifications.
Consultant's cost for additional assistance during bidding $39,000
Due to the complexity of the project, the City requested more involvement from the
consultant during the bidding phase of the project to ensure that questions by bidders were
adequately addressed. We had a total of ninety plan holders and six final bidders on the
project. We requested the consultant prepare and issue six addenda in a timely manner.
There are sufficient funds in the Water Utility 2003 project budget to cover the cost of this
addendum.
CONCLUSION:
The Water Utility understood and advised the consultant that all addenda to their contract
would require approval from the Administration and Council prior to the work. In order to
get the project bid out on time and to meet the construction schedule, the consultant EES,
focused their efforts on getting the work done before submitting a cost estimate to the City.
EES recently submitted the request for the extra work with the understanding that the City
Administration and Council may not approve their request.
As a result of the extra work by the consultant and City staff, the City received six
responsible bids. The low bid from Mid -Mountain Contractors ($10,644,448) is within
0.26% ($27,509) of the engineer's estimate ($10,671,957). Construction of the project
started, as scheduled, in October 2003 with an estimated completion date of May 2005.
CC: Lys Hornsby
J.D. Wilson
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements\Design
Contract with EES and KJ\Addendum #3\Issue-Paper-Addendum#3.doc\AGtp
ADDENDUM NO. 3
to
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CAG 02-010
Dated: January 17, 2002
This Addendum is made and entered into this day of , 2003 by and
between the City of Renton, hereinafter called the "City" and Economic and Engineering Services,
Inc., hereinafter called the "Consultant'.
WITNESSETH THAT:
Whereas, the City engaged the services of the Consultant under Consultant Agreement CAG 02-010
dated January 17, 2002, for project "Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements - Design".
Whereas, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering
within a reasonable time; and
Whereas, the City and the Consultant have determined that additional work is required to meet the
goal of the project. Those additional work items being defined in Exhibit A with costs anticipated as
shown in Exhibit B.
NOW, therefore, in accordance with Section VIII, Extra Work, of Consultant Agreement CAG 02-
010, dated January 17, 2002, the agreement is amended as follows:
1. Revise the maximum amount payable under section VI, Payment, from $1,077,366.81 to
$1,167,366.81, which represents an increase of $90,000.
EXECUTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 3 to CAG 02-010 with
Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. as of the date and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF RENTON
Signature Date Jesse Tanner, Mayor Date
Gregory J. Kirmeyer
Vice President
ATTEST:
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Date
HAFile Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment
Improvements\Design Contract with EES and KJ\Addendum #3Wddendum#3.DOCWGtp
Exhibit A
Addendum No. 3 to CAG 02-010
Consultant Agreement for Professional Services
Summary: As the design development of the Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course
Improvements has progressed to the 95% completion level, the relative complexity of the project
increased because of unforeseen geotechnical conditions, additional requirements for the
integration of the new facilities with existing Water Utility and Golf Course facilities, and a
significantly greater level of final design effort and coordination to minimize impacts to the Golf
Course facilities and operations. To better ensure that all project requirements are met and to
minimize the potential for construction change order costs, the City has requested more extensive
involvement by the Consultant for QA/QC of the final (100%) design and for assistance during
the project bidding phase.
The following are the work elements to be accomplished under this addendum:
Task 2-250 — Final Design Coordination and Additional QA/QC Reviews
Objective: Provide final design coordination and additional QA/QC reviews for development of
the 100% design documents to better ensure the clarity and quality of the documents to enable
good contractor bids and minimize the potential for costly change orders during construction.
Products: The products associated with this task are QA/QC reviews, with the resulting final
changes/edits incorporated into the 100% (construction bidding) documents.
Task 2-400 — Assistance During Bidding
Objective: Provide extensive involvement during the bidding phase to ensure that questions by
bidders are adequately addressed, any addenda that are prepared are of high quality and timely,
and provide other assistance to the City as needed.
The bid opening was extended for 2 weeks. There were a total of six (6) addenda prepared and
issued, the last three of which were prepared during the 2-week extension of the bid period.
Three addenda were assumed as part of the consultant's original scope of work associate with this
task. Therefore, the consultant incurred additional labor costs associated with the preparation of
the additional 3 addenda and to provide assistance during the 2-week bid period extension.
Products: Products include preparatory materials for and notes from the pre -bid meeting; timely
preparation and issuance of three addenda; responses to bidders' requests for information; and a
letter to the City summarizing the bid evaluations and a recommendation for award.
HAFile Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2953 - Maplewood Water Treatment
Improvements\Design Contract with EES and KJWddendum #3\Exhibit A for Addendurn#3.docWGtp
EXHIBIT B • Maplewood Water Treatment and Golf Course Improvements • Design
Addendum No. 3 CAG-02-010
Budget and Fee Breakdown
EES
Prepared.,
06/23/2003
Revised:
10/27/2003
by: AG
Tasks
Description
EES Estimated
Labor
Hours
Stall
Project
Sr. Eng,
Staff Eng.
Staff Eng,
Geotech
CADD
QA/QC
Admin.
Total Labor
Description
Manager
Dan. Mgr,
Mach.
Civil
Engineer
Civil/Mach
Reviewers
Support
(hours)
Salary Rata/h 43.05
38.08
30.66
25
28
25.82
43.05
20
2-250
Design & QC Reviews
40
40
0
40
10
40
24
8
202
2-400
Assistance During Bidding
43.4
80
20
48
10
24
4
24
253.4
19.4
20
8
20
Tasks
Description
Cost Plus Fee
Determination
Total
Overhead
Subtotal
Net Fee
Total Labor
Direct
Total
Salary Costs
Costs @ 170%
alary Costs
Q 12%
Cost
Expenses
Cost
EES
EES
EES
2-250
Design & OC Reviews
6,751
11,477
18,228
2.187
20,416
500
$20,916
2-400
Assistance During Bidding
8,280
14,076
22,356
2,683
25,038
2,900
$27,938
Total
$48,855
Tasks
Description
K/J Estimated Labor Hours
Staff
Principal
Project
Sr. Eng
Sr. Eng.
Sr. Eng. Assoc. Eng
Assoc.
Staff Eng.
Staff Eng.
CAD Admin. Total Labor
Description
Manager
Elect.
Structural
Instrum,
Mech,
Architect
Structural
Mech.
Designer (hours)
Salary Ratwh 53.08
45.58
45.29
43.56
39.95
37.21
36.06
27,69
21.2
27.87 18.92
2.250
Design & QC Reviews
22
28
30
30
44
4
16
30
4
32 10 250
2-400
Assistance During Bidding
10.7
24
8
8
12
0
8
4
4
0 8 86.7
Tasks
Description
Cost Plus Fee
Determination
Total
Overhead
Subtotal
Net Fee
Total Labor
Direct
Total
Salary Costs
Costs ® 170%
alary Costs
@ 12%
Cost
Expenses
Cost
K/J
K/J
K/J
2-250
Design & QC Reviews
9,590
16,302
25,892
3,107
28,999
1,300
30,299
2-400
Assistance During Bidding
3,487
5,929
9,416
1,130
10,546
300
10,846
$41,145
November 3, 2003
Mayor Jesse Tanner
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
i"
Dear Mayor Tanner,
4: &es dnnaahbn
RECEIVED
N u v 0 5 2003
M
IDS CFFICE
CITY OF RENTON
NOV 0.5 2003
RECEIVED
My wife and I are the owners of the property at 15311 SE 128�'. I grew up in Renton andCLERK'S OFFICE
worked for the city of Renton for a number of years. My parents were part owners in a
Renton clothing store. My father taught and coached at Renton High School for thirty
years, and my wife currently teaches at Sierra Heights, a Renton school. Our ties to
Renton are many.
We recently voted to annex to the City of Renton. We look forward to the annexation but
would like to be annexed at R-5. When we voted against the R-5 zoning, we mistakenly
thought we were voting for R-6 zoning. We now realize that this was not the case and
would like to request R-5 for our property. Thank you for your consideration, and we
look forward to being part of the City of Renton.
Sincerely,
10,
Randy Leifer r
V���
Rosemary Leifer
5!.a? S Goun- La" St
.5e6,t H& yV,4 980 S
November 3, 2003
Mayor Jesse Tanner
City of Renton
1055 South Grady I
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mayor Tanner
RG: &es dnnaahbn
RECEIVED
Nu V 0 5 2003
M
RS OFFICE
CITY OF RENTON
NOV 0 5 2003
CITY RECEIVED
OFFICE
My wife and I are the owners of the property at 15311 SE 128 h. I grew up in Renton and
worked for the city of Renton for a number of years. My parents were part owners in a
Renton clothing store. My father taught and coached at Renton High School for thirty
years, and my wife currently teaches at Sierra Heights, a Renton school. Our ties to
Renton are many.
We recently voted to annex to the City of Renton. We look forward to the annexation but
would like to be annexed at R-5. When we voted against the R-5 zoning, we mistakenly
thought we were voting for R-6 zoning. We now realize that this was not the case and
would like to request R-5 for our property. Thank you for your consideration, and we
look forward to being part of the City of Renton.
Sincerely,
Randy Leifer
a P4
Rosemary Leifer
51 a 7 S Foan fa n sf
SeaH& W14 g8)79
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 10, 2003
�°� '-1'"V1-7--) 0V
Date 11- lD-a 003
Wastewater Treatment Plant Interlocal Agreements with King County
(Referred. October 20, 2003)
The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence with the recommendation of staff that City
Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to ,execute the proposed Interlocal Agreement
with King County for the South Plant Electrical Cogeneration Project and the Amendment to
the King County Sewage Disposal Agreement.
The Committee also recommends that the $2,216,000 in mitigation funds identified in the
agreement be referred to the Committee of the Whole for appropriation.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\King_County_Interlocal_Comm Report_CAWDMCtp
APPPOVED BY
CffV COUNCIL
J
Date //- /o-coos '.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
October 13, 2003
INCREASE OF GOLF COURSE FEES
(Referred October 6, 2003)
cc: Victoria Runkle, Finance & Information Services Administrator
Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator
Leslie Betlach, Parks Director
Kelly Beymer, Golf Course Manager
A P P R, 10Ifr 0 By
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE
UNCIL
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 10, 2003
Date 1-10 -.�003'
The Community Services Committee met on November 3, 2003 to review staff s recommendations for the 2nd
round of Neighborhood Grant Projects 2003. After review of the applications, the Community Services
Committee recommends approval of the following grant applications:
1. Highlands Community Association, landscape around existing neighborhood entrance sign, located at
Jefferson St. NE and NE 3rd. - $700.25
2. Ginger Creek Community Association, continue development of a neighborhood urban park on a
Seattle Public Utilities owned right of way in. Renton. Area is approximately a quarter of an acre and is
bordered by Puget Drive, Beacon Way SE and 16`h Street. - $2,542.56
3. Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association;°'reelatm4° a p'eee Qf abandoned City of Renton right -of -Way
property and create a neighborhoodytirban,park, $1,950.31
4„
4. Windwood Homeowners Association, landscape around neighborhood entrance sign and common
areas.: - $1,683.22 .
t
5. Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association, `construct and ii stalI a neighborhood entrance sign, located at
South 16`h Street and Talbot Road Southt �$4,060,09
X
The Committee also recommends approval`:,, of futdtg for the following administrative newsletter
applications: ,
b'
1. Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association'- .$300.00 for annual',printing expenses for a newsletter printed
and hand delivered twice a year
2. Windwood Homeowners Association - $109.00 for annual printing expenses for a newsletter printed
and delivered quarterly.
Five project grants, totaling $10,936.34, two newsletter applications, totaling $409.00, and a contingency
fund of $1,094.00, as previously approved by Council on April 21, 2003, for a grand total of $12,430.34, is
Committee's recommendation for this second, round of Neighborhood Grants.
It is further recommended that Council have a Special Presentation to ,award the Grant Certificates to Grant
Recipients. on November 24, 2003.
v ice
Randy Corman,
C: Norma McQuiller
Rebecca Lind
Alex Pietsch
CITY OF RENTON, WASIHNGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3465
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY ENTITLED CITY
OF RENTON KING COUNTY AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR
SEWAGE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT REGARDING ODOR AND
CHEMICAL USE AT SOUTH PLANT.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton (City) and King County (County) have previously
entered into a long-term agreement for sewage disposal dated May 2, 1961 as amended; and
WHEREAS, the County propose certain changes and an extension to that agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and County desire that odors from plant operations be prevented
and controlled and that risks associated with use of certain chemicals at the plant be obviated.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an
interlocal agreement entitled City of Renton King County Amendment to Agreement for Sewage
Disposal Agreement regarding Odor and Chemical Use at South Plant.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this . day of , 2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
1
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12003.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE S .1012 : 9/26/03 : tmj
2
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1, FEE SCHEDULE, OF TITLE V, FINANCE
AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS, OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED
"CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON" BY INCREASING CERTAIN GOLF COURSE GREENS
FEES AND A GOLF CART FEE.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective
services possible; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the golf course fees shall cover
the costs of services;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 5-1-5 of Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V, Finance and
Business Regulations, of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
5-1-5: GOLF COURSE FEES
A. Greens Fees:
The cost of golf course greens fees shall be as follows:
18 Hole / Weekday $24.00
18 Hole / Weekend $30.00
9 Hole / Weekday $17.00
9 Hole / Weekend $17.00
18 Hole / Seniors / Weekday $17.00
9 Hole / Seniors / Weekday $13.00
1
ORDINANCE NO.
18 Hole / Junior / Weekday $15.00
9 Hole / Junior / Weekday $12.00
Weekend = Friday, Saturday, and Sunday
B. Golf Cart Fees:
18 Hole course $24.00
9 Hole course $14.00
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective April 1, 2004.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1044:9/23/03
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2003.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2