Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-320 • • • • 1 :. '1 • 'cam.:.-.; Hy •-.m,.. .:, ' • • • • FILE TITS • is paw 3 ;willow. 79 • _. • . . _ . . . .. _ . . . 4. • . . .. • .. • . . . . , • • . . . . . te, f %. . b. • • ei • ? °d; 4 '` pax }. Wa a fNC' '1A -•y ,G''i _• . r b- i' *' nc "' ,,:j `!,Ir'-- �.. v. • • • • • • • • • • • • .4*.k..--6'-7,-. -.ye,-.-*.. -"--,,,-.-.,:.ik,,_-,-- , %1,-.-,.4,•:.... ,,,, 71%, 's4C''''s '2...'il-''';61":'---1,77- 1"'- 44'.' '. '•';'-"'•4--Lw-•-“.i!0...4.1!---•:.---,-. .,• ,,., ,„,,,,,,. ..„,„-,... -,,,,,,,k;••;.:,.....vr,*?:t...,,.. .„..k.-,;:s, ,-.4..,:- •- .:. ,,,,,,,„..4..„..-,,,.5,:.*: .,.--,..'..1., , :!•,...,4_,:,..:'., . ; ,,,:,--,.-...:,,14"."," .,.,„,i,""--,.:,,1 g/.1,:t--.. .-:-..-44-s.._Ir., ,.;• z r,...4,,---.4t-". .-•'-';., "". ' -.- •-:,',;,-;_y-""-,r,i,,, . *-,..4,4:';;,,:,•,.:.•:.,,,Ii.:k....•,.. -••• .:,,"t" '.-r"-;•,"-:,e,47 :".:7.S- "<r7:44:::147.44V4,,..<4 'r ,, i',' .'--'-:!';:l.'44,-.,'L,,,- -,'," -'4' •' ',,,,, :%-kt;',:t.:&;--4'4.' •*--,RPO-';'' -- -- •::•,-,„7, ,'•.-- ...-.• ...,:-.:'-.1'.;;;.' i',-,4,: •14,-!Y,;_i-4'4.;.....- ',44,44 .'-,,,,,•_ tz,4,ziW: ,:1',7,"..;,,,,‘ ;--,'1"-,;,,,-'14,LV•01:-:&„:,- _.. .."'-'-.:.;,,,,,,J.:"'. ...'• ,•'.-4--,_..- ,,,,,•. „•.,%4atik.,f;: i•-,-. . - -,..7:,-4:.---;.0'4,4`...„;-,,,,.,;.`ii W.:.-:`4,)•1 * 4 ..,1;,:.;:...„... .:,.. .,,,,,.__,,...,41:, ...,..?).1_,,,:.,,.,:. ,.„ ,.;..e.,N,,,,,-0 ,-.J.if,-.:.--4-...-:„.,. .3..c.:.016.••"-,..,,,,,... , er , - ,-4-4 -,Aa., ' .-.4. :-..,, .„..4.-,_,.. i„ 4,,,:.;,A.. ...,:i fs.,,,,,--..iT,-. •-,-,L ;,„•,t,,, ...!.--.0-;4,-.:-4.,!-+.1i,A**,,Vgs.4,17,- ,:•.;'. 4'',,,t#.44.: :''• ,'• f..•<; .4"k"'-'••7,-4,:<:,..; '::1.r'4_'',..*770.`i 404,-4:‘-4•'''t "<<",';.,- ?"<< <,. '1-'4•f.:44144:<?"'"*"<"''45.41: ''- „..,*;.,4 ';t•'-:'r.,,,--'4' , ,,:,-, ..."---.,,,,,„, ;,-...:,• ,,,-4i1--,', • -...,, ,;,%,,,:.-.--;,::•.'-',.s',,„41•14-1-*.i.;--,_--_."--i'-7";....--;,'• '..:':'7 '•1k5. '.",•`'.',,4'e" .,.,-".4 '''''''',..,;,4,-.:•,,,.7,;i,-,?;z: *At-'- '4 4: -'4(....,;::': -;:s.r-:•7,!:.''''.47,1.,1:1.11-2:,-;',. ----.-C,,7`--7.X':-..:- 4s,,,,,,!-.-,„:,4.0c.,,,,,,if.:.- --.1,1:, ••'-is-4,:,;f:_i....-.c.i, . :•=-‘,.•.:•,,,,•,.2,!:1-.•,7„,,,',,,,---,..,,,.,.1:,:,,,,: ..,4,,,,. , - -,.. - ,--?:.#-Y„....'.•-:. ..\'49,.7 , ••••,-,45:-.4 l',-,..--.1.••*. •'.-.:-..;-V;:,... .--:47**.,%•,,.:%-• ''''.''''',V•Al!' .:!_:',•'1,44r:.,f'-',--i.:i%':ii:-'....,..-7;':T.'t ..'-' ..•--..:.4:,„ti /.4.1",44;',1.k-''i?,;z;;Y:'•-!- '4.'1,.:-.,..''''''''''.,,•'.-it.,-'''''t''''6.---•.-:,(ii,-.,.,:',„ :::-',,%.'31',41,.;W :X .;,"1: 1t.rfP,P,v-,-. ' 4:4,,," ..-3*,,I,,j,i,-,..,,i,,,0 ir,peit.,:4;',*/`;-i...-.'•:;t 7.-:,-Afit'tt,=, 7 .* *il-,'",a4A--414'",':' *_":Ce. *,•,f:r"'-"fl:.,, ' '.7.--.•'4',; .I.;I'l,,.:1'Y',:.z.1,74i.. . ":'-':,,i..-:.'- ••••?-.',--,-,4:--ri-,'--; ;;;T-S,V,,,:tf-A* z,:-'-:'4,1 --..•:.,,e&,".4*.7"-'',i,Z,,•.'4,t0, -•::„,: ',..,"',14, SI..,t'f:,,,,' A7.,'-1,:i.-....V.W:4.5;:i., :,:-•':, --..,::::,:-.':::,;,i,-::,---:-:;-. ..:,.::.4i‘'4,1-14--.11,Z1v.2.':,'..:, .'42',..,"'" .4: ' -r:(`-o‘i.,-.. A i,..,,3-1,,,)4.-:,44,--, 'A.:-•:,..-.,.,-,1,1-!,•,'-,.: ,:,!:'-'11-in.".:.':-..:,,.!;;::',--,^::,'.'',.,;•,...z.,a-...ii,,;':.'-,;.4.7'.-,VN....:,,,,--,.-Ni•-•,4'..,- : ,4"..„.-L,..--",;* •..,,,,,,r7,-,T. ,;,-....,;.,....,. ..:-!,:it:T.,-,..;,:,,':.,..—,:IN,, r.'r-I,'Tsf-,,,,,I--4,-. ,;(41..$,,:,-. ,, . .,.,...-, ,-,..,:.,,, ,t1i,,li,or:z. liolo. ,4 ...4„,„., ,,,,,:::,,,w...,,:,,,.2„...,_,.,,,,,,..,,..,,;::,,,.s.5.:....,.,,..,-.. ;:t,,,,..,,,-..,, ,„4„,_ . 3,,,,.,,, .,.4'-•.:.W.,1i.ii,,,', ,,,2, 't--.'''''," ek4-- •'k,,,..4.1' ,-,' -.' .."4 4 r t..,'''' • "' ' .i ...-,-..--,-..,z,,,. .: •-,?,,,, - k itt„.'4,,,,3,4;,,, ..'--:•'• ••,5'i•-;,!'•,-;.ft „: It---„,..,--- -,„,m..-. 4..•• ri,t',1•-•,-.7.--t.'.':-.-- i: ' • 2• - ---",•,:'••:''',-'•••"'K'). 1";.'"'.:i..t' ';-74'kP7:1'44`,4'i's:4 i:',':•,..koe -.,.",:i,,•-•+,:.,,,.;:"---.,7';'''''''''.-'1);-. `-'''''',.;iiet4Itil-'!,..d. "s"47," . • ''."'''.‘, ' 'i•'2 49.;.4,.:_7-'7, ?; .,,..., tk,.._k-_,11„,• --,..v.,..0;.%v"..!.-,.',,-,:,,-1-:: -.,-;•t-;''''. ,-..'k.'7:-'2: nl'''..,7, SOT ., -.7"7..s_:. •'..4.s.t,>• '-- -1,_,,:' s„,,-,-.:_----;-4,-,•,...- ,::,::::',-1,,, ,,,,k-4,‘.-, 4,...,7.,..-,.-1:<4:;'::::4,.:',54-k.:!‘".;,;':•:"; '0'':"'<.: T•lit;,..P1--,,-Aqt. 's..=--.f.- :-..;;!--,‘•.'.*•.",il,i444--?---', ., ,..- ,:' i-,....,..1.;:,,'W,.,;4t': .''.;,: :i,e;(f.;jet,,Zistri`.7-,,,*At.'":.51--;'' - 1.;°-.-'":-:',;•-"Y..-:,-1:44V-fi -- ---.N;.':'-' ,-,J:!---,..-5,-- -T".', :17, * vv .. „-;0. ;•.-vA . -,-. .'. . ,...... ,P•A:-UL--,j W'' '..KO.--S-TE NI l K,S.E ACTINGCH1EFsrRucTuRAiENGiNEEi• .'•.,‘`,-.--7'...'',._...''-'`k;,,,---:,. ....''.'', '''.:;:,'•'4 . :. '., ii.,'.•'If", . , '-'"...(e'11,4-04,•; , . ..... • , ,,-` - . ....::,...-r.•800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET . .:'1....:.''.,,', . r - GI THE AUSTIN RENTON WASHINGTON 98055 1 ,1.41,,,;,:-,..,,,,t, - - TELEPHONE 2061226-8800 COMPANY , -_-•z •-•-t,;*,.3...,,, _, =,•,.',-_,-,-•;,----..,-.„-- . • ,• DESIGNERS•ENGINEERS•BUILDERS _• r , . ' . r• il ,- -',, . -1 .' lifrrkir , ,,•:. . . , • . . . -7, •=r.'2.i.- -..;-',.-. ,' 1.... • - -- . ' •-; . • -.,.,r, J.,• 1--N-,•--,-.. .-:',-**--'• , • ..- F -' • • ... .': - , -,.`,r-•!,:4--.7.•-f 44,7.,;.,„A:r--''',;!:;-, , ',' ;- . .. ..•"..•',.:.,' ..'i'-.-,:-:._t_cil.',..',A,,-•.;:.,"*4-4-ii: -_---','",',•••••:'-_"•,-. ;;;“;-"---%i •, , , ., . . -,..i..'",- • .:=.,,--7.-..,V*..-,!.. ..,,•„,,,...,..,...:::.-vo,-.;-,..:1''.--k. '"„i"•:""‘-,,";,-1 . : - -; 1. ---;4,6::',..,.,•)"..4.,,,,.j:.•,- l'''„7,',,,,,:r. , • ). ' • - ,. ":•-.,'":;.,,:,'-,'..-,-,,-,f,r,„:,,,--is.'•'‘-••:'-', "1, ',1,..,! --, '',-;A.",••• ' .. .1.,-,• ;-...,,t .,..e",- ' `,* - 2"' - '- ..• ' '', - ,' '''''i"--4.-.' .*' 3! -..,0;,,,1`,•‘...1't' .. .„,:•-•• ,:-'1• ;,....,:;,,,,,4-A.r •;1'.•17P,...!1,,,?. .'' . . - ' • - ' ' .'•',:,`:''18';'•' ..,.'i''' ''''' . ";1;‘,.!4';' 4"'1', ."."``'''.:•••• i'1-•-•' .;•',:r.:- '"' ., .-. ., ,•-,-,,,.,,, . -.I--v.:- -.'-:%--,,-,,,..;);-:,,,",..4-•,.,-....,:• -- .- -,- -.-•'7-„,,--.,'• ':,' -; --,-,.N."1-13-,',,,-----4kx"iii.",;,,_.;4_kjil,:ifti.'"Y- -• 'N":.-:,`•!--: *, :,.;,;:-.-.•,,ci.--.,,,.•';,,:i.- •,;4:••,':-;.-..:lor,-•-. :-..,,,,L, -i-. . .c- ,- ••-.-,,:..I ,,,,,A:-7::::17,,..7.4.7W.5.'.7-,,,',"e '',._ •,, i:,,,, •---...--.,-,.•••.- ' . •• - ',,,-.'„:";...', :7-.-1',---,,,,.--$,''',--,r,;,-!•",'7.,''': •,,;',.-',' -,.: '':: -- :',-.,.,,-..0.,-..,:-.,"..4 4 • s'`.• .- ' 4.• ••-„, ',:-' ----. ' •:.rni-c: ' ;':- -. .: :--- 7,-;;;-•;,,,,- - `,r.'•k.-:;:‘. -..:.--,- ,Y.,.'-'--,...,-..1,:-}ir.:;•',7,4,/2,, ,,"*" ..,s, 4-,--; 4t-•' .' T--• ,--:,;i',, -:'7: "' ' '' .":"•" •`.'•`'''r ,',,,,.'" ' .<'• ''4--4-;,,.:.Y.-.. ?..:144:4-..4.4-,4,4-.4.4,4g:tiV - '..,....' •-•,.r s ,,,''' ."",:.'''***44.404.•-•..;•• .. ; 2" • * •-- -.":'*:• '':"' < -•"' '':''''.---,'.."-•1..4'73.";;-"'''''.44'4.i;6•'*1"4k'`-i''T!r, ';" '-''7• ' '4' "'''''''r ''"'• -'. :! ':} •%,"' ":.. :,' " 4'4- '*-: *:" ."*: ••-'•-**"'' :;'-'4 t-*4•!::4**4":""S'I'4 42.9"<t"4:"4 -`" r' - ',.".:'. '' '`' ''!' ' '-'•-:.: ::,- ' -: - ' ,, - t- --.! -1- '::C;.-4.-s,,V,',.t.,'-,',;,--"e'T;•••':-: ;,,,,=0 .--4,.. -.-- ' - :. ,--.,.-:-..1:.:"y:-'.-.' ;;:: ,.-- , ,- •-. ::. -, ,; ', :.-'-' .,, .-; -,;i''...::-...r•-,:- :-.'',-z'' ..:.'••J, f-"--fi:,:i.Z.it,.. ' '- :-: •,,:." ..'A•k!:,,'1.,'''.• -.'''''.-,:,.."',:':,-..: . ., .'. , '• • -,.- '-- -'' 'E---.• ;',',,-','A.,,:',e-VI',„„,'4,,•;`4.a;''''Z-TiO4•*itiC":/-4,.: .7.- :''•-, :--. ,' -.,-,- ,:;. , 1,--r---,: -, ",.-'' ,• ‘, , ,--."-..,- •- --.': ''''',,;'-', -:•;;"-4?-.:::,:,--::;. ',,:,,±41,"4„.i.__ , 1 ' '';•-- :" '.--'• '-' I•', -.4- "A•,,.-", ..--. , - - ; - .• . ,' ,:.'-..--n.,-;'4.:-,,--7' `,..,-;- '''',,-',147,71,;k',',.':,'', ., "' ..- --. --,-,s; .., .., -.-,- -- f • --'4 - - -I ',....-i‘' •"4''''..'/'."<'<iii,"*?: '..--,-:.-J ••'' ; ; ' „:-•_'' .. . . 4-,..,,. 1''..,i,..' - ,, .4.,-,.-,: ';'':• "--. .-.':' i."' '::. . ' -''.:i";..-.1.'-,..--,4-, ,...•-'i:,•:....--- . ...i :- :.,•..::.. •;.::.,-,--:,, --,,,.....,,,;....,1.-:41A-1.='•-: .1 ..:- - ..... ' :-„--•,;,;?...'4-ii,-;43w ..--, ,•--,-,_+•,..,i',.E,:,:‘,.,...: 'c,,z --- ..,,. . . ., -. '. - - • . : -. , ,,,,,t.,0,4",2-..4,,-42- 4•,;:,- -. - • • - : -','.v:-,,•,',.,-•.',•,.:,...'-e, - ,: . ; --,_-•," ; ..:•. ' '.•i.-•--,.:,`-,•:•Y,410.--,.'T,*,-,-- .-; : 4 ' • '.1.-'- -'" '34.-4'`' , v'''''': -• .'' :'''''•'' '" i•: "", - -• 4' :4Q..4 4'"'44.-"7: ': 4', •Ni* ;O.ii<:'-'4 p- -1:...,-,...• ,, : , , • ,, _. -,,t•-••-,, -,- :,-,'--- •-.4:::*,- -4-U4,...: -.'„i;inil,.- -.:•-.-'.i..;.' .," ' . . -.F• :- ,,,.--:--- --t-T-'.,,...,::':N.'.,r,cfe, ...: '', .-,;- : .. :, 57.:,1f. ••:' .1.' :C--- 5'e" '" '''' .' • ' ''' 1% ;'':'' , ''':7 A4' ".:: ';''--;Tir- ''4".:.-.---t..• .::;,'''.. '.;',,-_-:,'•..%,l.;=. .. -,',0•4,41:-..:',,,'''-:.4,40.,;-_,,. .tr. .0:?,- 4-.S.?...;-51'- ,'''..'' .41,;',::'-‘,'.. '.,!'' ..- .7.2?".''-'''----;:'••-•'- -`,1 ,;,-'..:`,.;','-',',,..,1.4,*--'7 '..-..4,:V.,:,:r''*:;':',;,:,','..,..i*:,;,.. ;',,• ..•-.- .•.• -".--5-:'..44,,3•z!,-,:.-1.:,-..,4..;,..._.• , ..,-, 4.,.,-,.-.-:•,., •-•, .,,..-_-,,.-- '."',,,.-.;',II•ik-.. -'.13.,..,; :,,,,t-2,--:-.--,-_-:,:-,',4;,-;-- -4'' :, L.v';• ..k.,--',.-----",riim,,,,,,,",•"'0---,;;.,1.-- . -,,-,,.:;.• '- •01-.A,--",_,,..-,;.<--;,-,n.;,,c,,,,---,,,„4-..,,.,,,,,,r4.-. t--„, .4.,,,,,. --,-,-.. - - ,-,-;-- .--,,,- :. -.L., .;„ . --,• -.;,-,,_„:-,;4,,, -z." ,.-,-.,i,,,,e,,L,,:',„,,,. ,,,,, - ., _ :-.. ::- , - - ..: %..t...,,,,:' • cTL _ 7'yfl@�!E AU TIN 800 SOUTHWEST S6TH STREET 1� RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 CO M A NY TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 TELETYPE910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS September 9 , 1980 • .Mr . Warren G . Gonnason , Director 143 Department of Public Works t'', City of Renton Renton , Washington 98055 ' ' �� .Y Subject : Fill and Development Limits on VO & IP Subdivision No . 2 • Dear Mr . Gonnason : As you are aware , we are preparing a site development plan for Lot 1 of proposed Valley Office and Industrial Park, Subdivision No . 2 . The area generally included in Lot 1 is currently being filled under a Renton permit limiting fill to the "north half" of the site . Considering "north half" to be an inexact term for an irregular area , and with the box culvert under SR 167 discharging north of the midpoint of the lot , we request that you consider the south lot 'line of Lot 1 to be acceptable for the filled limits . The area of Lot 1 plus the area north of the Caraccioli tract is 14 .0 acres , with the total subdivision acreage being 28 . 3 acres . We appreciate your consideration in this matter . Very truly yours , /4-ceP Paul S. Chiado Vice President and District Manager PSC :dt cc-Renton Planning Dept Renton .Hearing Examiner • • y 0 S.W. 16TH STREET N 89.35'25°E-411.17' N 89°35'25"E-448.59' 80' 1 o IF') q o o I • 1 c 3 aems,s• =90°0242°b z a R=243.87' a 1 • N89°35'33' E-261.13' • 1 • i .1 O W I 51 B co oN0'''' 50 9 a I � z I 49 � 10 . N 89°35 36 E-264.82 • 1 250 XC COL 4EQ% • `° �/D PO/N7 t7�j�t/EEiIJ sY✓/6 T�` /i S�/ /9 L O CD "' co N �-- N • ELI CD 500 2 ri 830'= K 0,1 292'2 1 Ii H + 3Or Q P • i 505'= 1 N 89°49 01 W-1138,55 • 633'- S.W. 19TH STREET • o i i l t • . a THE AUSTIN BOO SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 COM PANY TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS d tA clq‘ •March 4, 1980 / CJ \\.5. 1 4it� 5 �g ,6�� '/NG �� f Mr . Roger Blaylock ,..,� �.� Associate Planner u._ � City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Subject : File No . SP-320-79 Metro - 79-5198 Dear Mr . Blaylock : The special permit allowed fill to be placed on the northerly half of the property. On Sheet Y-1 the City noted "Before fill can be placed on S and E half of property, a hydraulic study will be required to show that an adequate system will be installed to carry the water from the site and the 18" x 36" box culvert under SR 167 to an acceptable disposal point." L. I.D. 314 has been formed and will divert the flow which now comes under SR 167 to a new roadway crossing south of our subject site . With normal perimeter channelizati'on around our site , as shown on our previously submitted drawings, we wonder if that hydraulic study would still be required . Please advise us as to procedures necessary to proceed on a special fill permit for the southerly portion of the site. Very truly yours , THE AUSTIN COMPAN C/J. L. Fox Civil Engineer JLF :ja OF R4 • o THE CITY OF RENTON 40 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0o Q,`O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�TE0 8Eele°� !f May 9, 1979 Mr. Paul Kosteniuk The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE AWNW°,� ;� ; , Dear Mr. Kosteniuk: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted in the Examiner's report of April 24, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner _....,�»�=ram•.,{, cc: Tanning Department R ;,, City Clerk 1�1 PAW 9 197.v BEN Toil, April 24, 1979 �4 �Fp F CE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER >- Q • CITY OF RENTON j 11.1 REP A('REC ENz ION APPLIC T: .% ‹ Austin Company FILE NO. SP-320-79 LOCATION: CANNING O Between the East Valley Road and Lind Avenue S.W. on the south side of S.W. 16th Avenue S. to proposed S.W. 19th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300,000 cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report and the subsequent REPORT: addendum were received by the Examiner on March 29, 1979 and April 12, 1979, respectively. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 3, 1979 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. David Clemens, Associate Planner, referenced staff concerns denoted in Section J. (Environmental Assessment/Threshold Determination) and Section L.4 (Analysis) of the Planning Department staff report pertaining to provision of additional information to clarify the environmental checklist requirements to allow issuance of a declaration of non-significance for the proposal. He advised the applicant's request for a two-week continuance to enable provision of the required information. The public hearing was subsequently closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m. and continued to April 17, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on April 17, 1979 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report and addendum, and the reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and #2, respectively. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibits #1 and 2, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map Exhibit #4: Existing and Proposed Contour Sheets (2) Exhibit #5: Cross Sections of Proposed Fill Exhibit #6: Letter from King County Planning Division to Planning Director, dated April 4, 1979. Exhibit #6 relates concerns of the King County Resource Planning Division for landfill on industrially zoned land in designated flood hazard areas until applications for building permits have been filed on 75% of the currently filled and vacant lands. The Examiner requested clarification of the number of truck trips required to deposit the proposed landfill. Mr. Clemens advised that dependent upon truck capacity, 24,000 truck trips were estimated. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1 and #2. Responding was: SP-320-79 Page Two Paul Kosteniuk Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Kosteniuk indicated his concurrence in Exhibit #2, noting that disagreements relating to finish grades which originally existed with recommendations contained in Exhibit #1 had been clarified by the supplementary report. He inquired if the permit would allow increased volume of landfill if determined necessary at a later date to meet proposed elevations, or if revision would require an additional public hearing through the Examiner process. Mr. Kosteniuk noted that due to unknown factors relating to degree of settlement, the exact amount of landfill cannot be determined. Following further discussion, it was determined by the Examiner and Mr. Clemens that if additional landfill is required to meet basic design parameters and proposed elevations, the revision could be reviewed by staff during the annual license process. Mr. Clemens indicated his opinion that if the site area and elevations are not exceeded, the current permit would remain valid, although substantial increase of volume to the extent of 400,000 cubic yards would require additional review through the hearing process. The Examiner requested an estimated completion date for the project. Mr. Kostenium indicated that current available material would provide 50% of the estimated landfill within a period of one year, with the remaining landfill provided as soon as possible as it becomes available. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the applicant's willingness to comply with ordinance requirements for fill composition, Mr. Kosteniuk indicated his concurrence. The Examiner requested a representative from the Public Works Department to respond to the traffic analysis contained within Exhibit #2. Responding was: Paul Lumbert Traffic Engineering Division Mr. Lumbert indicated that the projected volume of truck trips from the site could be adequately accommodated by existing roadways in the area. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendations contained in Exhibits #1 and 2 would remain as submitted with the addition of the previous clarification of ordinance requirements pertaining to site area and final elevations. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SP-320-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:35 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit to fill 29 acres to elevations of 17 and 18 feet per Exhibits #4 and 5. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. Opposition to the proposal was expressed by the King County Department of Community Development (Exhibit #6) on the basis of availability of surplus filled industrially zoned land within the flood zone and absence of a "watershed project." 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Chapter 23 (Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances; except for: a. Plans for rehabilitation of the site were not submitted per Section 4-2306. SP-320-79 Page Three b. Compliance with the setback requirements of Section 4-2314. c. Plans for mud and dust control were not submitted per Section 4-2312. d. Storm drainage plans do not clearly comply with Sections 4-2307.5.E, 4-2313 and 4-2318. e. Erosion control was not specified per Sections 4-2312.10, 4-2313, 4-2318.2 and 4-2319. 8. An annual license from the Planning and Public Works Departments is required per Sections 4-2307.2.B, 4-2307.4, 4-2310 and 4-2309. . The staff reviews the project prior to issuance of the annual license for compliance with the Examiner's decision and the provisions of Chapter 23. 9. The landfill will be 50% accomplished within one year, and the remainder of the site will be filled as material becomes available. 10. Estimated traffic impacts (Exhibit #2) can be accommodated adequately on existing streets according to the testimony of the Public Works Department. 11. A State Flood Zone Control Permit is required of the King County Division of Hydraulics. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal is compatible with the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. Appropriate wildlife habitat mitigation measures per the Plan and Resolution No. 1923 will be required during development of specific site plans for the property or during rehabilitation of the landfill per Chapter 23. 2. The landfill operation will ". . .not be an unreasonable detriment to the surrounding area." (Section 4-2303.2.B) . However, this is based upon staff approval of appropriate erosion control, storm drainage and wildlife habitat mitigation measures prior to beginning the landfill and during review of the annual license. 3. Compliance with requirements of Chapter 23 (per Finding No. 7) can adequately be secured by staff prior to issuance of the permit for the landfill operation and/or issuance of the annual license. The Planning, Public Works and Police Departments should collectively review the permit and license to achieve a single set of conditions for approval of the permit and license. 4. Although 500 of the site will be filled within one year, leaving completion of the landfill operation open ended to whenever fill material becomes available does not appear within the intent of Section 4-2307.3. The applicant did not indicate when the operation would be completed. However, a reasonable completion period appears to be four years from issuance of the permit to begin the operation. This will provide approximately three years to complete the operation following filling 50% of the site in the first year. 5. The cumulative impacts of truck traffic within the general area where extensive landfill operations are occurring should be monitored by staff relative to the proposal. This site lies at the intersection of two key streets serving the area (East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street) . Also use of Lind Avenue S.W. over the freeway may prove more difficult and congested during and following work on the Lind Avenue LID. However, it appears that sufficient authority exists in the annual license for staff to require alteration of access to the site in response to changing traffic conditions in the area. 6. King County's Department of Community Development (Exhibit #6) did not give the details and basis of the conclusion that sufficient industrial zoned and filled property exists in the Green River Valley to accommodate industrial or manufacturing park uses for some time. It is clear that the analysis is based upon some general data collected in 1978, almost one year ago. Sufficient accelerated building activity north of S.W. 43rd Street has occurred within the past year to draw skepticism of the County's projections and conclusions. However, the other contention of the County is that landfills should be disapproved until an "East Side Watershed Project" is completed. This recommendation has not yet been approved by the Basin Executive Committee, but is at this time only a recommendation of the King County staff. Until this becomes adopted policy of the Committee and the City of Renton, it appears unreasonable to impose such a recommendation upon the application at hand. In effect, the County requests a moratorium upon landfills until some to-be-specified ratio of undeveloped/filled to developed/filled land is determined by future study. SP-320-79 Page Four This is a policy decision of the King County Council and Renton City Council which has yet to review this issue. In the meantime, it seems reasonable to approve the application. DECISION: Approve the application subject to compliance with all requirements of Chapter 23 per review arid approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments per Conclusions No. 1 through 5 and completion within four years. ORDERED THIS 24th day of April, 1979. /1/-41r11141111.10 • reeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Paul Kosteniuk, Austin Co. , 800 S.W. 16th St. , Renton, WA TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of April, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 8, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. = a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 CO M PAIVY TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS \I h April 5, 1979 V � `D APR 6 ig79 Mr. D. Clemens 1,9 ( City of Renton 47 1% Planning Department �,NG DEPN¢:,/ City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Clemens : With reference to your Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for File No. SP-320-79 , Section L, Item 4 , we have the following response : A minimum finish floor elevation of 21. 8 feet using M.S .L = 0. 0 DATUM (U.S .G.S) is required by King County Hydraulics Division. Finish grade elevations will obviously be less . For warehouse or light industrial development which require truck-dock operations finish grades of 21. 8 ft. - 4 . 0 ft. = 17 . 8 ft. , were found to be acceptable by King County Hydraulics Division and by the City of Renton in past discussions. Therefore, rough grade elevations ranging from 17 . 0 ft. to 18 .0 ft. would appear to be acceptable. Although there are no present plans which indicate the type of development, we would anticipate the following as pos- sible types : The 29 acre site could be subdivided into ap- proximately six 5 acre developments consisting of two Ware- house facilities, two Light Industrial Complexes , and two Office Parks . Each Light Industrial Development could generate a traffic count of 483 trips , each Warehouse deve- lopment could generate a traffic count up to 700 trips. The Office Parks could each generate a traffic count of 1032 trips. These assumed developments could give use to a total traffic count of 1490 trips at the intersection S .W. 19th Street and East Valley Road, a total of 1190 trips at the intersec- tion of S.W. 19th Street and Lind Avenue , and, finally, at THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 co M PA ICI Y TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS City of Renton, Planning Department April 5 , 1979 Page Two the intersection of Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street 330 total trips west along S.W. 16th Street and 1320 total trips , north along Lind Avenue. (See attachments) This completes our response to your request for additional information. Very truly yours, THE AUSTIN COMPANY Ralph E. Luke Manager of Design and Engineering by P. w• i P.W. Kosteniuk Chief Structural Engineer PWK:lk Attachments cc: P. S. Chiado ls ; King County State of Washington Department of Planning John D.Spellman, County Executive and Community Development John P. Lynch, Director PLANNING DIVISION KAREN RAHM, MANAGER W217 King County Courthouse 516-3rd Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 206-344-4218 April 4, 1979 P/CfNic AP Z Gordon Y. Ericksen .-�- '979 Planning Director v w Vww City of Renton Municipal Building /4/G 4\� 200 Mill Avenue South DEPAO Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Metro Industrial Park - Proposed Grading Plan Dear Gordon: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed grading plan. Following is a summary of the major issues we feel should be considered before a decision to issue the special permit is made. Over 1150 acres of designated flood hazard areas in Renton' s portion of the lower Green River Valley are zoned for industrial uses. As of June, 1978, approximately 575 acres of that land had been filled in anticipation of devel- opment. A substantial portion of that filled land, 407 acres, was vacant. By the end of 1978, 57 acres had been developed, leaving 350 acres still undeveloped. Valley-wide, of the 2670 acres of landfill on industrial land in flood hazard areas, 1247 acres (45%) was vacant and developable in mid-1978. Recent market figures indicate that, by the end of 1978, only 226 acres of industrial land in the same area had been developed. Thus, the acreage of filled, vacant, industrial land in flood hazard areas within the lower valley as of July, 1978, exceeded the acreage of industrial land developed in that year by a factor of five. In light of these figures and in the absence of the planned East Side Watershed Project, it is difficult to justify the placement of an additional 29 acres of fill in a designated flood hazard area. As you know, at its meeting of March 23, the Green River Technical Committee approved the following two recommendations under the Valley Interim Policy and Regulatory Plan and asked that they be forwarded to the Basin Executive Committee • Gordon Y. Ericksen 2. Planning Director City of Renton April 4, 1979 for final action: 1 . No new landfill on industrially-zoned land in designated flood hazard areas shall be permitted until applications for building permits have been filed on seventy-five percent (75%) of the currently filled and vacant lands which have been identified in those areas. Exceptions to this policy may be granted to applicants who use methods other than landfill for floodproofing or otherwise removing structures from the path of flood waters. 2. To the extent possible, local governments should utilize current market data on the annual demand for developable land in issuing new permits for landfill in flood hazard areas. We concur with these recommendations and feel that they are reasonable actions which local governments can take to prevent the premature placement of landfill in flood hazard areas before planned flood control measures are in place. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sin erely, ,k \.D van racy, ction Head Resource Planning Divisio DT:df cc: George Wannamaker, Hydraulics 0 10 a PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 3 , 1979 APPLICANT : ' AUSTIN COMPANY FILE NO : SP-320-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300,000cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road . (Site development map attached . ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : PAUL S . CHIADO 2 . Applicant : AUSTIN COMPANY 3. Liocation : Between the E . Valley Road and Lind ('Vicinity Map Attached ) Avenue S . W . on the south side of S . W. 16th Avenue South to proposed S .W. 19th St. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±29 acres I 6 . Access : Via East Valley Road 7 . Existing Zoning : H-1 , Heavy Industry ; L-1 , Light Industry 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : H-1 , Heavy Industry ; M-P , Manufacturing Park ; L-1 , Light Industry ; "G" General Classification District. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10. Notification : The applicant was notified inwriting of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on March 23 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 22 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 dated April 14 , 1959. It was rezoned to H-1 by Ordinances #1845 and 1955 dated January 9 , 1960 and May 14 , 1962 respectively . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . Puget silty clay loam (Pu ) . Permeability is slow . The seasonal high water table is at or near the surface . Runoff is slow to ponded , and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard . This soil is used for row crops and pasture . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUST'IN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3 . ' Vegetation : With the exception of a few scattered deciduous trees , the site is predominantly covered with grass and scrub brush . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : An automobile repair garage and service station are located to the north of the subject site and a lumber company ; light industrial . uses are situated west. To the south is an existing single family residence and mini -warehouse presently under construction . The East Valley Freeway is located to the east . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area .consists of a combination of presently developed industrial property and undeveloped land in the process of being prepared for such development. F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends east 450 ' from Lind Avenue N . W. at which point a 6" main extends approximately another 450 ' adjacent to the northerly boundary of the subject site . A 16" water main runs north-south on Lind Avenue adjacent to the westerly boundary`. An 8" sanitary sewer extends north-south along , the E . Valley Road approximately 1 /2 mile south of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit: . Metro Transit Route #156 operates along SR 167 to the east of the subject site,. 4. Schools : Not Applicable . 5 . Recreation : Not. Applicable . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TH.E ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-713 , H-1 , Heavy Industrial District. 2 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 .� Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley , June 19761, Goals and Objectives . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and cause an increase in traffic and noise levels in -the area . However , through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 . Population/Employment : , .The present fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment, however, future_ industrial use of the filled property will need to be addressed upon specific development. 3. Schools : Not Applicable . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , FILE NO : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE THREE 4 . Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic : Potential adverse truck traffic movements will occur during the filling period . Conditions related to hours of operation will reduce the level of adverse impact (see further analysis below) . 300 ,000 cubic yards of fill will require - about 12 ,000 truckloads ; thus 24 ,000 truck movements . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance will be required . At this time additional data has been requested to clarify certain issues listed in #4 of the analysis . No action may be taken until a declaration is prepared. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 6. King County Division of Hydraulics . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject site is presently zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry ) which will permit commercial or industrial future development on the site . The proposal generally conforms to the comprehensive planning and zoning for the area . 2 . The applicant does not have a specific development plan for the subject site at the present time . However , he indicates . that interest has been shown for development on the site providing the site is properly filled and graded . Future development will be subject to City of Renton standards including the Hearing Examiner ' s Site Plan approval per Section 4-2302 . 2 . 0 and the requirements of the restrictive covenants running with the land . 3 . An LID is under construction for the extension of Lind Avenue S .W . (80-foot. right-of-way) along the easterly boundary of the subject site . 4. The applicant ' s prior fill and grade permit approval (SP-063-77 ) is located to the immediate west of Lind Avenue . This previous permit provided for filling to elevation 23. 5 , this above the floodplain level 21 . 8 feet. This current application proposes an elevation 17 , which is insufficient to comply with the minimum floodplain level of 21 . 8 feet. Although this application will commit 29 acres of future development in industrial use no uses are currently known , and the proposed fill does not achieve a developable elevation . Due to the size of the area involved and questions as to future use are unknown at this time , the Planning Department has requested the following information to provide clarification of the Environmental Checklist : (a ) What general types of uses are proposed , and when development is expected to occur . (b ) A detailed traffic analysis of said proposed uses . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 APRIL 3, 1979 PAGE FOUR (c ) Clarification of appropriateness of only partially filling the site . Due to the fact that this information may not be available prior to the hearing , a continuance may be requested . 5 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that the present drainage ways shall not be filled until , specific plans are approved and implemented . (See also comments on the submitted vicinity map . ), 6. The Utilities Engineering Division indicates that the subject proposal will required water and sewer extensions and that latecomer ' s fees will be assessed . 7 . In reference : to ' #4 of the analysis , the Building Division notes that fill in addition to the proposed by the applicant will be necessary prior to any building construction because the .17 ' elevation is not acceptable. 8. The Police Department has recommended that access to the site be limited to the East Valley Road and S . W. 16th Street. Other comments about debris , hours of fill 'operation , and signing appear to be very appropriate fn light of the 24 ,000 truck movements required . (See attached memorandum -for comments . ) 9 . Review of SP-063-77 indicates that the Hearing- Examiner requested from the City Attorney an opinion on setback req-uir-.ements for landfills (see SP-063-77 for background) . The subject proposal is governed by the same legal opinion . If the applicant believes that the .10 ' setback requirement of Section 4-2314 constitutes an undue hardship , then it will be necessary to -file 'a variance application with the Board of Adjustment. 10. The Hearing Examiner ' s conditions of approval in SP-063-77 should also apply to this application . Copy of previous action attached. - Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :At the time of this report preparation , the applicant has not been able to submit the information requested to complete thee., environmental review as discussed in #4 of the analysis section . Should sufficient information be available at the hearing , approval may be recommended subject to , but not necessarily limited to : 1 . Those .8 conditions of SP-063-77 (copy attached ) . 2. Those 7 conditions recommended by the Police Department. s.:7-1.''''.- 1•I'l . ,_____-, _- 5/.... i. -.:1;''•:' ----'," • ..... .... . . ‹- -- --- --1---- tti 1 . 1 / , 1 :,•„... . „_,,,_ • j U I i I 1 ----- ......• , I •D . 0 , , ________--------,--------- ..,...„..„... , ,, ..._ • , . , , ,...,. .,.. _ .„..._,,, , „...• , , , . . ,, ,, _ ..... .....;„ . , ,,, I , •,,, ..„, .. ____•,__ ,-,__......-----,-:,-„--,,,,...--_--.„..-3-.-.----.. ..,„,,,,,0000.,,,,0,,,,-10,, ,L, ,,,...,...„ , , . -'.--. R-6-• '-' --0000-e-iiiiiiiiweel- r„i 1 i .....-it , .141V1 f• 1 ir . -,... IIII.---r7Tr"TOLI ViLL 4.G,ts PL „. d. i , a Tr..fi . • • . 7, ..•I kr" .....,../„....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1 ' -0 --'• .I.4,4414011111 Oil I " X. oujr1 jj -1"-I- •A4 ' i3,511 .11'') ' .. .,, . .... - -e- .-"---' 7+401"ifilr111191:Tliiildpii I 1!.1 14iir'',P'' : •l ---- ,. ----- • "" .alilf3/3134,0...4Ic di ---,,,,. ---, I (------, ,, -.... -... ..5 ::„,.."•''''',,..-,:;>,- ../. , ---.111,11-x-iterglia'...p,,„ 4 , .--- r el - ,I.: 0 I II L rimIll ly , t:t (11 -I :'II rill II 0111110i -.. ( ___- :----;----• radii ,-.; ,,,,,,,,. .,.. i. "'"''" . siiI1L-'.,?..1_1401111 IiiiViii.ggiiillid‘._:;,,,, ' ., I i e( glik. i, ,____,--,________.__ .,.--;----_-:-___---7-----_-_--,L--,___„ , „.. ... 4. . ._.2_ , ..,1'''''''f, -,.. *, 1111 "Init. -4.11111WA ' I, i, ,..__ _-_-_,:---- -_-__---- . --- f 4.,,,Re.6 1 0 ,,,-._L___--------_-.----- ----- . , ... , 1;14 ...4. :.--). i . r..,.,0,Lii, ,,..,.,...,,,,,.......,.....,,.... , , •,-,,,,._. ., Is.,..,•,,,,\\ / r )' 110' aiR .M.': 'i it3i- ---b - " '' • i . V, 6--C-1',`''''.;"*""-- •otidrill' riff=re lti-[ • • -._ ,11. . catrit) li ' .---"'"--- re ,'mi— r. .51 , _..._ 1 — ---1,.......,,,,, 1___,t1-.. -.. ..........; - .. 1 ...„..„.......r....,..„.:.;„ .. __ ____.. • ......, .........;"1/11.1:, 11FIA, ilt I .I-1----; -• - .1 ikililliraill.R -. II i yL_, „L. .- -I ----I 47,I, . II---......... ....7...;; ;0=•-•....II2A4.•.'..1_.!.'"'•f`!"'"7"-'-',''''' , A 1,7119. "rt7,77.1,4‘..-•.,,,,, ig...> .*, :/ ). --,. _, . _ '41.----nI‘4'1 i ''7, 1,. .--,-, - „,„.... •.... - ::1_1-2 -, ;_:-ill:::•1 I, Itir , -.1.,...1, 1,...ikiks rid ,;,.,,,,,, .F___, .... .,,• . ____\ : .... L,,.—_,i,s__,!,-,,,-,-'-'..1•,_---G-,.--6 _,,,,,„_6_-_-.„-iwv. v _• __ ... . . 4,7,-,, t,„.11 57 ' '4-5 • ti j ,- . -,- •--i<F 11/1 1.0.4, Sr V —I>it -1"- . '.. ..,.#1.t...4.4 ,i ',: --'-, -,1 ii I _ .....\ . ...., , •__,____.--_.1 . i TT -_-__;,aE-,-.-,---.---9_-.2 7'--,---:4-i '': ti,gnn#II*I.' '''''''t oi:,• ,,),,,,.. ,.. 1 ____10 .11 ,....L. - 4-+-.--- -•:12:7 --, :-7-71:i 1---II-4; - -•:I.;4--.I.V.IIi-•-•.M.--- Ii4.44‘.,lie'• •:"...i_.:V,. ' a ;It r !•___,) _._. -- 4, ' --- -J•t-_-_,,-. .±-_-.-2:-.„ .:::,:A:-_---4.:---;-.---,. -; or f il,e/t, •,g, 2ji le. 7. \ '.- ' 1' -------'• 9''- -, -ILI . , t•„a 4 4 \,-- 2-1'...ft: '.. Cz .F ,. ' ciz, :-..-A.7-i .2...., , . , • ,, A. ,. k„.2-,-; ...,-, ._ ) „ 1--11.111.`-i— i • - . - ,-_ '----f-e,-_- -10: ....1 . -.4 •= 1- - -...f, rr6. ,-:, ,, , il %.---1----k -'I - 7, 4. A. „ • . • • •-',:._ -I r '-- -30;1' - i ' , - -', -.' r, .74__ __•_.,.,:- ,, 4. , ! ,i,..,_-_-,‘_.\---.,-,,---4 S.,'11., '6\ •-t-, - ' -ot s t_ :-- 2( - : : , : •-: •-' '11' - - ' s' ' _ -----I.- i t", , . '11,1, . •.;t , , ._ -L3'_ ;.;- -.:----,- ..-• 1' ---,-.:..-_--...:-7,1,- -: : I m _ __•1_- ' a -- • ___..,k '11,..C :--- :/' -71-'2.1-'.. !-- 1•••• fr),-....;-_-_-_---,<:- •• .-* ,t j„..- r,,, . \,., ......c....„._.1. __ IR c.,1_ . . ,.i. ,_ __...! •___1_,7:+1..,_,..:_„..! ___-1---,.-''“:*., . ,---' ,„tette.'. '''5"::stt0-4 Il - - ---"4"tt• rtA°b. 'L-- . . '_____k . ----- •r-- --- - I IMMO --71 7 liar- . ,--.lora I , T.,,,,,, ... __- . I. . ,• ., „..._1 A• , • 19 •• ' .' A \) t---7.--- t \ ‘ ,. I .., I r •• 35 2 0 1 .15 ' '`''''''''.-i ---1 -le ---.( 4•-• ---.1 . • _ . __, __. _„ ., -- -• — — —w.,‘ , 11 i I 0 "' .' _ _.; ---i e- .0. t4 1P---- , • •G • LI:iiiii_----H r---li-115=.-- ' - -,1 - 4 i b . 109 '1 i.0 ,.. i .,,.0 , .. 4..............k....., I! . I''-. IW4 - -- -i .i •An • • - "^"' " -- p \ 1 ."' 110' ' es lo • as 0 • j,s. 1 ::_-- 21:-1-1-.___. 1121- 7--- 11\i \\ t,, L...i i .t .4„. .,,, .. . ,,,., , .0., ..,... . ,., ... __ _ i- -----,,,,,• — ,k __4 . i • I k - ‘ .,...- .::._ k A \ \ 1 1 .' • e, o ‘3, - - ...j k • tt . . O' .. •• • 'I ''2--'*------- m i'• t.' - *-..-1 ---- - '-i Iti ------- ---- ••• ------------ - --• ---- - • 0 5 2 kr \ ' t • I -5- (... 1 . • . . \ , . ..\ • I .. \ , 1 t.• , , , \1 I . s . • t.,, I L. i . , • -,„ , ‘„., • \ H 7 1 1 ' t \ 'd , _, .,,, . bsr.7;-:,°';,_,:,-,„ . '''"--.• ,! ,_, .._ ..., -- - -- , •,,.--*S.A*".•_•-• ,1,6,,0 ..1•<;7:A....,..-• '5,1: 1?..- ,..,',IYIN-"..---- „..,!--%,-•".." it I 1 0 i ,. • ..-0 , ...., • ‘," ‘1.a.-4,\-:..--\-,,,, , ..,>)--,,,,-__.., _,, ..„i-:., .;-- ;.\.:,-•;)!,-.,'R.,-f, -,-,,.. ,-•-s:, _:::4.j..;-•..‘- , ‘ \ ‘ . ,-.. 7.1_.) ... 1,.•!qt.-1.1,T ..i.,,z;•••,,,... ,---,--..,) '' k 1-• 1. '' .. -, s-i-J C.•-7-'7.).:0,‘" '--,r--s, -r-, , . -t,it.' ••(•' ••• ••••-,.'"••-----' • _..- --- --- L- ' ' -".* '--midlei THE AUSTIN COMPANY; File No:• SP-320-79 , • ••= ---,.... :................• , APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±29 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road • ',- EXISTING ZONING H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1,r ight Industry EXISTING USE Site undeveloped; auto repair garage & lumber company to north; light industrial uses to the west; single family to south and mini-warehouse under PROPOSED USE Fill & Grade Permit for future industrial development constructfon COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS . _— — INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: CHIEF DARBY 3/17/79 DATE FROM: LT. D.R. PERSSON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The Austin Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area of Maple Ave SW. 3. All fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4 . All empty trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW to Grady Way, then east on Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5 . The roadway will be kept clean of all dirt and debris "AT ALL TIMES" . 6. The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 PM or from 8 AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular route for all the trucks coming and going and will not adversely effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 PM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours, however, would be into the evening rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding this matter in the attached memoranda dated August 30, 1977 and August 31, 1977. Existing ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) prevent the Examiner from granting a variance from the slope setback requirement of Section 4-2314.2. However, it seems app P ri to comment upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. The setback of Section 4-2314 is intended to ". . .preserve the setback for the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy of foundations, and to prevent damage as a result of water runoff or erosion thease lopes."us (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter 23 is to ". . .protect. . , s. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C) and to "Promote safe, economic, systematic. . .grading activities. . ." (Section 4-2301.2.D) . Application setback will accomplish these purposes; however, it may be counterproductive in instances. A moat could be created if the fills do not meet - a setback area pe equal to double the building setbacka area ears not to be thelontent ofck theor ordinance. "protecting" each property. ThisPPro erty The intent seems to be to require landfill to be set back from adjacentetar casepe of where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting property protection. However, in other instances nothing getrimental undergoingclandfill be ooperations. , but moats may be created around neighboring properties It appears in this case that a variance should be sought from r retheeBoar d todaofomodate f Adjustment. ' In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably a wider range of situations. DECISION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is .approved subject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitathpue r asesngs perethetlanr dscapiig materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. . 3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. _ 4. Control of mud and debris onsw adjacent tdorn waffe affected edsp publicl right-of-way be implemented by a mechanical 5. Exposed slopes are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV. 7. Tops of the slopes to be no less than 10feet from the building setback lines established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . • • • SP-063-77 Page Five 8. Public works Department monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED THIS 13th day of September, 1977. • • L. Rick Beeler ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ® ark Department Police Department ® Public Works Department .J Building Div . ® Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) {� OW ID E2 el;/91/4MOQ DATE : B 77 PLEASE REVIEW THIS &ô. APP FOR : APPLICANT : f1141'6J LOCATION : �D. 64= IAD Avi', 601). &/ goo/t1 APPLICATION(S ) : N.... p g�1� / "'7 . ga 4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,-+--v� CM Approved U Not Approved Comments or co itio - s : 0 Lomments or conditions : ,; Pc.A.A4-(,-,___., 3 — / j_ 77 Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date • CITY OF RENTON PcOti; APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT ��' ►' �, �� 1 b J FOR OFFICE USE ONLY dEP \v- File No. SP- -3ab "79G7ate Rec' d. Application Fee $ 800• coU '/ Receipt No . 0 3e)3 Environmental Review Fee $ PAQo APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800 Address 800 S .W. 16th Street, Renton, Washington __ 98055 2 . Property location Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S.W. 16th Avenue south to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Blocks 19, 20 &23 of C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per Plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats on page 74 , records of King County less lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 of Block 19, less that portion of Block 19 conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under auditors file No. 3916580 and No. 4554803 • 4 . Number of acres or square feet 29 acres Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for possible future development. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other 1" 10 or 20 ' factors limiting development) B . Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ° C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning 1" 200 ° to 800 ' on adjacent parcels) D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77,.-' ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department Belding Div. ." Engineering Div . ® Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design ) �� OW 1(,/ et ` , - ' SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4 -'79 ; Application No . :_ gt7.49 Action Name : glote r }. `,ray! ® ego• 9 00-1:4 Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : v g 1 Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 SIGNIFICANT -'1-4frNON SIGNS FICANT Comments :141--ee-n f S' .524// /off"/ ,?6� /2/el /,./ p'e ".:';‘'' . 0/ a.,) d /7)-7/1e..',"7:1 61---",2 le c:-/, r'ri--v t/ - ,sl-te-)-kL-----) 0 ki..._ a/iih9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department Efr//4ice Department Public Works Department o B ' lding Div. Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) Traffic Engineering Div . , Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: •Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) VAJ 117 .12 ctocm,g , DATE : V0 /9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : i /ON 4 r:_ LOCATION : /. • or 00 kt ,, k • ' 4AI 161/4 66�� ,,e APPLICATION(S ) : la,, i�3�� / .'i �'7 ' et, 4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Ps. Approved c' Not App ved omments or conditions : Sew �- P & y- eta teXT.4 -'--, uumments or conditions : 3/i y/79 Signature of Director or Authoriz d R pres native Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department Building Div. E gineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design ) ; (V410 C e ; v//e/99 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- eo -- m� oe • Application No . : �j I ' d� Action Name : a INDMIAL, tUkt) 17/1) Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : g- Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Titled ( tiCseekegf 1 ! SIGNIFICANT I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : . ,. TO (-3-777 Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department Police Department Public Works Department ® Building Div . ® gineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by, responsible official or his designee ) r2 p0q/441 C1� ,0 DATE : PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : -it4UI?cr!kl q . LOCATI-ON : el= GAMS 4 6Pj. APPLICATION(S) : OWIAL.4psor �� ®� w IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : TS 4 fict, tic,"15 4M ' 20 Approved Ej Not Approved Comments or conditions : comments or conditions : i! 3 - —7 S gnature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : 0,4 nance Department Fire Department m"f Library Department ® Park Department / ® Police Department rr ® Public Works Department .r• ® Building Div . r Engineering Div . ( Please verify legal description ) ,e / 0 Traffic Engineering Div . - _ '." o-`Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his VAJI17 esignee ) (2 / WPl 9 DATE : vie li PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4U1!,flk1 `i. LOCATION : �t.. eyr J,U A 4 gal' APPLICATION(S) : I1 LWWI. ` _7 : f i., ki 4rAt26 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX IN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :r t Department : - / i"' Ef CO Approved J Not Approved Comments or conditions : i 1 1 pLi' h.i I ± c ,i ! Li 1 .)(.'� (�l.Ll-'J�' .J - i '2_ i 7 9 Si nature of�irector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : vT\L-k--0. 1-T -Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : b C-z'r r'i L C,1° I .,,:.r ' W\_.L. 12 Ye'a, •; w 21-7-M r1 q' VR a.n,c c TZ x rr/'.T1 or&S, -. L ATri c 0...rYs. S f„,, S. G- la. 3 - '3 - 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date J 1i 4 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department ® Police Department 0 Public Wor~k's Department Grcuilding Div . ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee) Q¼JM7 i2 C1940* DATE : 1/419 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 114 4(141'!kl 441 LOCATION : 7.4 . MO kit Pd' i 1* !( 8 APPLICATION(S) : ,461WIAL., l Mr le,04q • U, 4 4- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Ge1.7 -6;• En- Approved L23 Not Approved Comments or conditions : l 0 . d )4 / 6/ 74 ci . . _ , 0-6--0(-,-; . L9:". p7 6 ' , . . /_• , � 2---6(161)P)' 1-14— ,la- " cam. &DG S - 'Cz (/' f44:'G-`e- — —5—)S7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 17 , 1979 APPLICANT : AUSTIN COMPANY FILE NO . : SP-320-79 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300 ,000 cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road. B . ANALYSIS : ' 1 . This application was continued from the scheduled public hearing of April 3 , 1979 , in order to complete consideration of. the potential environmental impact of this proposed 300 ,000 cubic yards of fill on 29 acres between S .W. Lind Avenue and the East Valley Road. We have requested and received additional information regarding the potential uses of the property and the traffic impacts of those par- ticular uses . Based upon the additional information pro- vided , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared in this matter pursuant to the City ' s Environmental Ordinance , and subject to further environmental review of each proposed use of the subject filled property . 2.. The applicant ' s letter dated April 5 , 1979 , discussed the apparent discrepancy between the previous fill proposal by the Austin Company (west of Lind Avenue) . The apparent discrepancy deals with what elevation should be deemed zero feet . The prior proposal was based upon a zero feet elevation approximately seven feet lower than the U.S . G . S . mean sea level datum of zero feet . This is consistent with the elevations utilized by both the City of Renton and King County Hydraulics . The proposed fill is thus in the range of rough grades between elevation 17 and elevation 18 based upon the U. S . G. S . datum. The previous fill is also in this range . 3 . The applicant describes the potential uses of the properties as including , but not necessarily limited to warehousing , light industrial , and office park uses . Based upon a traffic analysis provided by the applicant and reviewed by the City , if all 29 acres were developed in the uses described , the following traffic impacts would occur: Lind Avenue north of 16th - 1320 trips Lind Avenue south of S.W. 19th - 1190 trips S.W. 16th west of Lind - 330 trips East Valley Road south of S.W. 19th - 1500 trips Of the street segments which would be impacted by develop- ment of this property , the most crucial is that segment of Lind Avenue crucial between S. W . 16th and Grady Way , which is limited to two lanes by the width of the freeway over- crossing . The additional 1320 trips would be an increase of approximately 20% in the current traffic count (4275 trips ) in this street segment. 4. We have received a response from the King County Resource Planning Division , which recommends that this proposed fill permit not be approved due to the existence of approximately five years of potentially developable industrial land in the Valley area already filled . King County ' s letter indicates that on March 23rd the Green River Valley Technical PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ( SUPPLEMENT) PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION APRIL 17 , 1979 PAGE TWO Committee recommended to the Basin Executive Committee that no further land fill applications be approved until at least 75% of the existing filled lands are developed. With that definitive action by the Basin Executive Committee and the City of Renton regarding this proposal , it does not appear that withholding approval of this permit at this time is warranted. C. RECOMMENDATION : Approval of the special permit application subject to all condi - tions listed in the April 3, 1979 , report to the Hearing Examiner subject to : 1 . Those conditions of Special Permit 063-77 ( copy attached) . 2 . Those seven conditions recommended by , the Renton Police Department ( copy attached) , except that hours of operation shall conform to 4-2312-6 (7 : 00 a .m. to 8 : 00 p .m. ) . 3. At the time of site development plan approval : a . A minimum 10 ' landscaped setback adjacent to all public rights-of-ways . b. Of the remaining site area , a minimum of 5% shall be land- scaped , one-half of which shall conform to Resolution 1923 . }. �1%, lul zr u�, 2 1' I /per ' '�'\\'�Y\L..M)'� • ,,,�.*�'� ��-` I f \ JIB ,f • a _ I !0 _ _ „wow!!I ` I I I I\\ ' '/ \ 5 RENTON VILL AG! 7L 1 ate+M�.Ac1° ;s ,' ij�III 11 Iq�dl 1.41191 d . �� I / ' �_^ ,�. .�•r "1;�%-',,4.' A I- NCR?Cp4�� • • 1 III ! rV�li; jg 1 le[, • llt�` J- �`\o \ \ I5 /' .. 4,,.Ij pier, •u ;,;1 I ~"iI if b 1, n I ' ., i \�1 \ _ - — °rt :I ••. ., , sti . t III `"_ .�- I11 ` ��IN I: L .p � I�M i�lll�4: III °111110010 � 'e �__ .,f �1 7 ' ,' 1‘ ill 'w.,. + . • . t0 ..1-. ) - � t ! . . A \ • � i : r: � � ...�.-•.Z �,'1 j /—,� k�TyR' `� : _-- 4., _ I _I— :-L- a) ^ nyy.':I 42 err rr - -- y, y• ' 7~' f • 1^) �_ - -- — --� ./r� >, 1 L• '6,-- �. .-06--i< -/" :A,1�1Y? 1 � i r,, 1 ."--, ° • t le Ls., �! a� •ft. ° W, y i'--,?Q� ? K DWI _ • se+l\L U t-i. v' ,1 b- -7 ,1" .'`�d el 0 1• '. I.4 �1 Qr- ~--_-, I -r._Ii i ,- t• 20 u k =-1 �. __. 9? � � _ - - �c _ -1 t, -'1 -I I i1.:._::„. r __•.4'. �r�S} QQ` s�. • , ._._,n INI111A lim.••,' . " ..: `,' i. I _ r } - Is. -. ~> rya '_y. ..;k _1 N,,.�_y,__ S''T -1- s241- - '. -\ 1. L \\\ .. R 3 el A,.�_� t1 r _, I �- t t )• ta�a ,— r ..0 _ i L—J —J -Y•r_- __ _—. t �1 to !• ,1•��p� ••�+ — 1 I : I } j 1:q 1 II a. ILl \ iL '! "4 1 i fi • 1 g.*, Ir / • 1...... •, a ac +/ i,1•..6 1 }� M S r f rt r w ' 1,,47' • .V-r --- *: { ,r..\`s� 'r>' 'JI l' JE • 1 hip -:'•f'�'_; _ \ '�11 . .. ..._ . -, --t.,t- = •. 1 THE AUSTIN COMPANY; File No: SP-320-79 1 • APPL I CANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±29 acres 1 PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXI ST I NG ZON 1 NG H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1, Light Industry auto repair garage lumber company to north; light i EXISTING USE Site undeveloped; p g g industrial uses to the west; single family to south and mini-warehouse under PROPOSED USE Fill $ Grade Permit for future industrial development construct) o 1 Manufacturing Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS 1 f. W�I • • • • • • , __ • _., . ••••• 1:.......:"; --- kj 0 • 1 ,ili• , • / m 0 , w.,_ -1Q' — .<::::: ::::: . • . cn 6 iliAcATED ..:::: ::::: !... .... am= , ..... M ill 1..... I THOMAS AVE S.W.SWj Z_41.1... 324' - • , -.. z • • -- .. 1 rn•-•.:-3..::1 •:•.....i % , 1 Z CI r. 0)i.1:::'•:: .......1:‘ 1 ., -' m 0 C ...1 .. .. . , ....... .... 4 • Il' cilm 11'2171 Ili. 1 \ , . _ 1 •:.:4. -< :::•?:". ff.:: . ; Zsi.t.':i. ••.';'::: :i..,• 40:f.'s.: .......• ,.....4 '•":" ..",..... Sb :i:::: •••••• :..:..1 • 346. • :iiii ...Ili _ .. . - .• . :•••••••.... ::::.... .... — .—.. v SECTION LlyE - ___ ;.!:,.i.: RAVMONp AVE SW. ---- :.:• . •• . •. , • 1138 .... •• ,:i..i .::,•;.. •....:; .. ... ... .. • -0 ii:.:i .. ... kil A; ...:.: • ..: • , th :•1 PI O $ .:". ..... ..•. ' fr;f2 til E .r,,,, • 1.:::::,.. .............. ii:•:::: - a . - .. P•, ' • :.":.] 1 .........":i.....!......;....!.......:.: :.....".....!..........,.......... . . I* • .. ... 0 ....: SENECA AVE SW. -,• w • to • .... ,.." • (7„.: ..:. ...i. .....::.... :.!.......... • • r In - C NI ........ ....... 03-I n1-1 • .. • • i''...i 33; . ....'.. . :: ........ :., .:, ' . ... . ' .. . , • w::: —- - - ---- •• •. cb'.• LIND AVE SW. 1132' ' -.:'' :.r.:.!.:.=•!.!.:4.:•:.:4•:.:.!.!•!.:.:.!.:•::r7".,..n".775,,,,,77:7 .--_ ..--._ -AC ' t,*',',',, ..',''",;.,'';'‘I""3f,i„loI,l4.1l-;,,4..::''"—;',"$.1"',:•.%t1'-,94.4,-.'4—;7..',s,"''"'',•, '"t.-'.•.-'"'".;.4—'..r.,t"‘Ar.:,,*.-'t,''•. ,,,,-,1'•".,':-'.„-,-'^-.,..I.,..--k' •'+'.,',',3•',.t i ,r,k.,,','.r... r r . ..•.•......•.•...:........•.•.......•:,.:..............•:: .........•....."....,.......•.„...•....'.... ........•.... ...•.* ...• ..•.. __ [. - ., " I '":!1'.1;.,.!,...2„......4isi,"• , , .-... • ;4 ''''...." •••"'4'N'. ' ,. ' -4,,.'4'.',"'-' -t":'',...•.` :'," ' .•• •••. • ••... ...•-• ••." •'• s.,.,- " ...4 .-At:,,, , ,F- Jr.:. 1,-. ,,, • ., , • ,- ' ',,f, t•,',,,I.) ,i. ;: 23 • r '-• r •. - •,, "' AT,.,b' !..K.'''''r-, •-',g. ',„-'.".''-4," ,.:' „ ..• „lit.,,, I',t, :: .. ..., m ..i:.::....:1:::::-... .........:::.....•''''::::...1 1 z --I jco 't't I ,• .,-I, , e...,,, •••s••=n•,,,,c1,1:i 4. • ,,,,.. L'it4.1.'e '.... 'F.: t. '1'.,' 6 '''L.• -,.?..:, 1 1, '%;1:01.•::,' ',',-,:,.. '.... .. Li'I.: r 1 0 ii:,.,:'.4 •:,..-....r,.....0''iv':.'*J.,-,,.. ' :'. • ', : '-r .:..'":'e 'A I . — 0 ., • .; ..1,;„ . ,•,,, ••...,,,,„ ,.•••....i., t. . „,:',' .. . " I / :.::: ::::::• .\ \'\ 1.,t... ,,'„•,., •,.,V,i .•s, f-•tl•,... ' '..—:;;-••., • , s- .•: Pli.,;,... ; - ,;?, •i. • -1.4 .- . •,..1.7 „ y„iy, 4., ,:,1",'' :':' o rn / :.11:.... .:::.1 'C if) it" .'4''''14',,.r'-'• '''.'''..1`'.'' ,r'x ",.,$•''.. ,'' ',e;'''''' ' . ,, . ,4t..k4.:-If.C; if: C go ;,!...,. i...2!?•, . ': -.01;4'4,- ' .t ' 4:,,ir....,,';',i. ',I.J.,.:N,... ::: ! 0,„- /.., ./. ../ 1. ' I .'''j•Ver'.';',11,..4 ct', ':...' •,-",:r.-I,,,,, ,' ; ',:,4-1,c.,„,= , i' -:.;-I-.3',-. ';,,..,•!..... ,,',g. ';': • :1 . .,', f,4.• 75. Li :,- ''•::'r‘;''.;e'tt' ''',5.i.',',4--,,P,, ' .,•.-' .i, '' '','. '... '.:Ig't...;:ti. ..'''''''' .,, ''t:'. `:'. ' m g ..:: ::1 ,,.... .. :..',.. ,,,;„•,e:,,i :.q - .•:- - • . : ,.- 0.f-• -• • •• '::. i ....: ,..,. r.• r ,.. ,.. .., , ,%.1.:.4. . Y.•:;."' 1, , I..: `.. ..'.t. ... ., ..,,''';,,..A:.(..:,1:!,:°''...al'• ''', ... , ,,f/ '' '''' ,1,.A1.,t,,,i'lr.'4'"4?*.'''t.;$'"':P:',':00..."' ...''.$.'•-• *. '','".',;.:r.'1.'''.4'.,* ;!,..,1.,'''‘.-.4:44 . ' 5 L__ / ,.,1.',.-•.'te4;4'../1..ip,.,,=, _t f't, ' ,''''.' ?:444 • :.,,,-,%;^,1 ,, , .,.-4.44n.--fl.74!: •' :*: ,... (. ...,,r.r.V.::::..f.r.:!::•.:‘,.., ::::::::. ;::: , ?11.Z,..•',..rl':T'''...,,i :s. ,.. .,....:. ..., , . .„.: • ,..., i. ” ,,,.. - i,.,,, ,20 . - ..• ,::. 44:04,1,,..,,, ... „ „ _..„ •., . ) )\• , , ..,, , _,,,,,, ,, . , -,,..,,- • , , , ,,, ..,.,,...,,,,:, 0 ....L...A„,,:!„-, ..„; : , • • .,, . ..„. • ,,ro.,,o.,,, -, ,•• r, . , ••••• , -, ., 4 r, ,, •, -,,c. -„,,, -: , . ,- ...... .... .---. ••• Xc ,-.4 -,,,...v.i, .:. • .., :. . ,„... .. — „.. ,rn . ., At"t, -4: c„,,,,, !,s.,,,,,,,i,,,!.',,,..y. •;,,,,,..* >r .;•.,..,P7,,,.•4,. ` .:.: - -,• ', ,1„5,:.•• ./ •• , ••.. ,•,,,,•.i.,, .•1.-le; ,., o— ),...,;;,-e., 4. .. / , • .. ) ) .4 / a 0. 1.0.-;, ..r•!e'••,. ‘•k. • .........,.....: ................... •• ••• 1.1 I) -•,,,..1.-.„0.4.i 4:;,,-;• e,,,‘,..",, w r -'' •f=--- ..• ,..,•., .g ., ,,,,,,,..• ,.„..„ .„ , ,, .:„.........•...........''FAST :„.„....,,....,.....,..,.....• .. ,...... . .,.......,T.....=:.. .. VALLV ROAD —7:4';'i:::::':.1::::......:.,..:::::.*:,••:•...*:.,....,::;?.... .::••••::::.:::::•:i:•::!•:::::•:::•::•:1:;•..7::::!:::::: :::: :',:::'-*:::.:::!:„:.::.:.:••":.::::::?..fo:!:::::T:7:::!:::••::':::!:•: '',....:;a'....i..:: •,....:.':::;,:•':.5:::?•:??..."7711!5—..........:::::..:::',.,.::::•••;:.'"...'.:;,...',.....'::!'.:%:.'4'.:i:ii'•';?;i:711::1:::: --- '''.''.''''.'':.::::*:*::,:::.:::?:. •.::::::•::::.::i:::.::...:•••:.:.•1;•.:.1.;•;;.•&.:•::::::••••••-••-•• --:-...:::=:;,;',-;;.,„:„........„,„.,.!.,.,.,...„.„.'4;r.:.:,:;.,:.:::.if.,:..,-,.:.,.:::.i:ii5*.•:7;::7;;;z:307.T.,:.:.. .:::er•-:..... :•:...M,..4:;,:i.:....::: ::::::..:-:•,,,:: ::::;1: :::::::::::::, --,....-.1:.:. 7........5fM:i:.::.$.p. NI:2•••167-!.:,..:,:.:•::z,n,•*:,,:,M.-V..,.::•,.::,.:,.: .•-,.,7:,.:.7:..-:,.iiii,.i77.:7:!.:7:7:7Mi7;ft:•;:i::.:i::i:::i::.:i*i:•::,,:;:::,,,:::::::::::;:;:;$17::;:;.;:.:;;;::!.....,..'::;;;.;.::;.:..........,,::...,,.,..,..„. . . ::::.; o.i fa;4,---'''''''''-."--H.7.::.......7:::...!:•::•7....:::•;7:::....„:::.,:..,.....,,,....:4•.;„•;%. .'.'''.'•'•-....*:.i*:.;:;,2:::.,::.::•::..:x:i:i:i:::::,..,:::;.::;.;•;::::•:::•:::..:,:;:...,.........,:::,::::::,:,,,,,.... ..s........,,,..zz,,.. ',:::::::::::::,..:•••:•...... :, !..i. :'..::::: •..... ..,.., • / .•.. •--- -- ' " ---- --- ''''' ,.. -1. '''.' , .: .•:•.• .:::: • • ,... • • -.:x.. ..•.:::... ',...:::: . ... .;•.>• : ... .•. .... ... .1- , . ••. . .• .,,. • ' 1 • \ ... ...... • ...':::..%. . . ,. ..-..:' ..•.::. '1...f. .. / 7 i z*-pqxl,w r 1 \--„,..,,,>. •• cn th p pi iv r 12 9 DIEllai M ...v., el r el •ni I 1 I Ir " , - ;, om o ,- v - , - ( . • • •• • ® THE AUSTI : 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET fl1 ■■ RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 CO am 43 TELEPHONE 206/226.8800 TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS PECl April 5, 1979 APR 6 2279 Mr. D. Clemens '"4 City of Renton ji '\ ' Planning Department GDEP � ' City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Clemens : With reference to your Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for File No. SP-320-79 , Section L, Item 4 , we have the following response : A minimum finish floor elevation of 21. 8 feet using M.S .L = 0. 0 DATUM (U.S.G.S) is required by King County Hydraulics Division. Finish grade elevations will obviously be less . For warehouse or light industrial development which require truck-dock operations finish grades of 21. 8 ft. - 4 . 0 ft. = 17 . 8 ft. , were found to be acceptable by King County Hydraulics Division and by the City of Renton in past discussions. Therefore, rough grade elevations ranging from 17 . 0 ft. to 18 .0 ft. would appear to be acceptable. Although there are no present plans which indicate the type of development, we would anticipate the following as pos- sible types : The 29 acre site could be subdivided into ap- proximately six 5 acre developments consisting of two Ware- house facilities, two Light Industrial Complexes , and two Office Parks . Each Light Industrial Development could generate a traffic count of 483 trips , each Warehouse deve- lopment could generate a traffic count up to 700 trips. The Office Parks could each generate a traffic count of 1032 trips. These assumed developments could give use to a total traffic count of 1490 trips at the intersection S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road, a total of 1190 trips at the intersec- tion of S .W. 19th Street and Lind Avenue , and, finally, at I,- BOO SOUTHWEST 16TH E AUS ■ L k, RENTON,W AS NGTONSTREET 98055 Co PANIC TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS City of Renton, Planning Department April 5 , 1979 Page Two the intersection of Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street 330 total trips west along S.W. 16th Street and 1320 total trips north along Lind Avenue. (See attachments) This completes our response to your request for additional information. Very truly yours , THE AUSTIN COMPANY Ralph E. Luke Manager of Design and Engineering by R P.W. Kosteniuk Chief Structural Engineer PWK:lk Attachments cc: P. S. Chiado I THE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COMPANY SHEET DESIGNERS • 'ENGINEERS • BUILDERS LISTED BY /I:7K OWNER /q1= 7W-) EST. NO. CHECKED BY LOCATION 47�N 7 J/"/) W oq. SHEET / OF a CONTRACT NO. 7‘) r/9 c.`' DATE /. . _,/Ei • • rILL PE2Af1r — TAArf-iC AAJALYS/S NI ®" J goyi c • S VJ 1(t7 -. SI fil:.- rr ... ,, I 35olK.„ 0S -zpoTr., • i ' 3STKIPs• I • 3-' >r .) a Q • LIG,yr /l,�ovSTx;At_ LIGHT liJoz)sri?, T J -: v 483 TRIPS iit3 J 1-. 1 , , S t(-' o r eE p��K arc/rg A' .r si • ; , i I161(..1-Kips iv.cIPS e 5— 5_ a SwI S1T a . FOR NO. 48 - - 141 b 1 RIPS i..11 1 • 1 . • . a • gaTHE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COMPANY SHEET DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS / LISTED BY / < OWNER ✓^vA TR0 EST. NO, CHECKED BY LOCATION J' 'E &1 To.) iAi Al SHEET Z OF 3 CONTRACT NO. 79-5 l 9 8 7J4 1)CJ�JC A N A c y s i DATE r L /G/-1 i hv cast-2,/-^ L . OE ✓L: L aPi9Eti' 7- rlvA,cCAi. SE / ./_L,7:7/5'e -'7 Ps',',4.:l/-, i I SPAct PE-( g;,-) S& r7 O A 0 sS 4.1(Ii/e P-),<,';/J I 8 a : _a _ // / :Pc4 c(Ls J* Eb a u C,J ` JU Z 40 0 I V4 1-11 CLL 1 6' 5.4G X P G4.-: , _ 4E 3 1'I',r=•.5. ^ L /::;:t? //_,,.. ; :-,.;,J:,.� /,D03 .22 VV!•l)C LL 7'/Ps 374 _i. 3,6 8 x es '%,)0 _ 100 �/CiP$ ut9rzul ,,ze_ -1 0 ----- ------i 0 1 is i B L D G 26. x 340 = 82 40�'�` E 1'>: 16,�i, �,�I �: i! G 0 / M / s CI / / 'Ia N v- S 4 O 110 FORM NO.48 / ( 2 A � ` ACJ THE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COMPANY SHEET DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS r LISTED BY OWNER /7` T(`tJ EST. NO. CHECKED BY LOCATION A/C 7 v' SHEET '- OF CONTRACT NO. 7O- 7-4,? sia DATE �i I ®ril ee ��/'<�i(' D� vz fL1 ,J! 2 1 7 7 27 / U V "?:1 • ,s �, <�, U /) 3 ? I ' f IOC 6L,O6 , � ►N C S'-I o r• yA • n -25X-1ZS e\ So y, Fr , I ` I • • 0 23S FORM NO.48 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION _ TO : ® Finance Department (CI\ �`�' -71/1\t4)/\\ '\ Fire Department ' 1 �'ti Library Department q ® I�,y 1 0 Park Department `� ..4 �`"`^, ,k, ®�,, Police Department �AR�� Public Works Department 0 Building Div . c......-etird- 0ngineering Div . (Please verify legal description) ETra' fic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) 190P _. ' 0 ( ' ':7., !;/'5C' DATE : oe ‘ °° r` PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : /672v ' f 0 LOCATION : / r ,'t. '. ' ig, " _...w. APPLICATIONS) : it /- 'o I/ 1 . 5® ........ etke*iAgoeil ." 400 / --------- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING �" N , RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : _ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e, („,e, E. Approved Not Approd Comments or conditions : V1/2 //��' "1 z/• A C"J-V-K14-4_prk-s,oe—ti/1-4-.-x.___ 1/.,4/7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ' ive Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 4-1 f=lc. L--- N C-,N F .FtiI M G rsj Approved =1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : - JJ (lr JJ I 7-o ` cr cT"�� ( -1-a i c. Vo I�1 � c S 'a.Vq St�,-i , i is b ,4 IA' If - Ji-2 _ �� Signature of Director or Authorized J R�pres nfatiV9 Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public,, W.orks Department 0 Building Div. - ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM:, Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) ,e ( ; ,, "t :61/. DATE : 0' :l PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : T� b• LOCATION : I1//41 I APPLICATION(S ) : //)- *� •-"7/ e, `��• ",0 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : -// .!'�` -` � REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,iep rtment : r. i. Approved Not Approved �omments or conditions : • Signature ofiDirector or Authorized Representative ate • 1 King County County State of Washington � � ,. Department of Planning and Community D.Spellman,County Executive ,+�''�, �" �"•. �'� Development At - 4 4'i u t John P. Lynch, Director �I. 3{ air PLANNING DIVISION KAREN RAHM, MANAGER W217 King County Courthouse 516-3rd Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 206-344-4218 April 4, 1979 RF % Gordon Y. Ericksen -0 5 2979 Planning Director City of Renton 2�� Municipal Building G ®EPAR�� 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Metro Industrial Park - Proposed Grading Plan Dear Gordon: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed grading plan. Following is a summary of the major issues we feel should be considered before a decision to issue the special permit is made. Over 1150 acres of designated flood hazard areas in Renton' s portion of the lower Green River Valley are zoned for industrial uses. As of June, 1978, approximately 575 acres of that land had been filled in anticipation of devel- opment. A substantial portion of that filled land, 407 acres, was vacant. By the end of 1978, 57 acres had been developed, leaving 350 acres still undeveloped. Valley-wide, of the 2670 acres of landfill on industrial land in flood hazard areas, 1247 acres (45%) was vacant and developable in mid-1978. Recent market figures indicate that, by the end of 1978, only 226 acres of industrial land in the same area had been developed. Thus, the acreage of filled, vacant, industrial land in flood hazard areas within the lower valley as of July, 1978, exceeded the acreage of industrial land developed in that year by a factor of five. In light of these figures and in the absence of the planned East Side Watershed Project, it is difficult to justify the placement of an additional 29 acres of fill in a designated flood hazard area. As you know, at its meeting of March ,23, the Green River Technical Committee approved the following two recommendations under the Valley Interim Policy and Regulatory Plan and asked that they be forwarded to the Basin Executive Committee Gordon Y. Ericksen 2. Planning Director City of Renton April 4, 1979 for final action: 1 . No new landfill on industrially-zoned land in designated flood hazard areas shall be permitted until applications for building permits have been filed on seventy-five percent (75%) of the currently filled and vacant lands which have been identified in those areas. Exceptions to this policy may be granted to applicants who use methods other than landfill for floodproofing or otherwise removing structures from the path of flood waters. 2. To the extent possible, local governments should utilize current market data on the annual demand for developable land in issuing new permits for landfill in flood hazard areas. We concur with these recommendations and feel that they are reasonable actions which local governments can take to prevent the premature placement of landfill in flood hazard areas before planned flood control measures are in place. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. (SinerelY, \ _Do van racy, ction Head i Resource Planning Division/ DT:df cc: George Wannamaker, Hydraulics t The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding this matter in Lue memoranda .dated Aui: 30,1 1977 andAugust 31, 1977. Txisting ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) prevent the Examiner from grantJ , a variance from the ate slope setback requirententlof Section 4-2314.2. However, it seems appropriate to comment upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. • The setback of Section 4-2314 is intended to ". . .preserve the setback sfor the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy Y of d to prevent damage as a result of water runoff or erosion of.thease loppes."and (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter 23 is to " p s. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C) and to "Promote safe, econ of omic, systematic. . .grading activities. . . (Section 4-2301.2.D) . App intctionuotiv in setback will accomplish these purposes; however, it may be cinstances. A moat couldlbe created lareaeand fills 10-foot slope meet setbackfor- a k area equal to double the building setback "protecting" each property. This appears not to be the intent of the ordinance. The intent seems to be to require landfill to be set back from adjacent tart propertof where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting property protection. However, in other instances nothingedets rimental can nndfilshown, but ions. moats .may be created around neighboring pro P f It appears in this case that a variance should be sought from ethe eBoar trdaofomodate Adjustment. In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably be d a wider range of situations. DECISION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved: iubject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitat purposes per the landscaping materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by the Planning Department. This landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. 3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. 4. Control of mud and debris onsadjacent orn wa affected r ds ublic right-of-way be implemented by a mechanics l 5. Exposed slopes are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV. 7. Tops of the slopes to be no less than 10feet from the building setback lines established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . • • • SP-063-77 Page Five 3. Public Works Department monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED THIS 13th day of September, 1977. • • L. Rick Bee: • • • • • INTER-OFFICE MEMO CHIEF DARBY 3/17/79 TO: DATE FROM: LT. D.R. PERSSON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The Austin Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area of Maple Ave SW. 3. All fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4. All empty trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW. to Grady Way, then east on Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5 . The roadway will be kept clean of all dirt and debris "AT ALL TIMES" . 6 . The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 PM or from 8 AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular route for all the trucks coming and going and will mt adversely effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 PM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours , however, would be into the evening rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson • 7 q PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/cur!-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-320-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ELF-438-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal -The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 3U0,000 cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road. Proponent THE AUSTIN COMPANY Between E. Valley Road and Lind Ave. S.W. on the south side of Location of Proposal S.W. 16th Ave. So. to proposed S.W. 19th Street Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : The following mitigating measures are to be taken at the time of site development: (1) Minimum 10' landscaped setback adjacent to all street rights-of-way; (2) minimum 5% of remaining site to be landscaped one-half of which shall conform to Res. 1923; (3) site plan approval per Section 4-2302.2.C; (4) any future physical development of the subject property will be further reviewed for environmental impact upon application. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official ! Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plan g ¢ rector Date April 12, 1979 Signature AFEIII. City of Renton Planning Department t 5-76 NOTICE THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. 16TH AVE, SOUTH TO PROPOSED S.W. 19TH STREET, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APRIL 3, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. CONCERNING ITEM WI S REZONE YirSPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE I SIDE APPROVAL • WAIVER I SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ■ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department C.� R�U[/��O CD Fire Department APR 1 -11 Z Library Department ry, ''.•..,y�,,� 19�9 aOPark Department ‘______'.•. �,� e/Police Department EPAR-�� Public Works Department �� o ilding Div. .049 gineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) C Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee)/ e), d4U/ICJ £ ( ? w4 DATE : 1/6/71 PLEASEj REVIEW`, THIS APPLICATION FOR :. APPLICANT : �, 77A go. LOCATION : &AD I AW" 1 APPLICATION(S ) : '/�- �%/�;i— .9 / // eg "e'er's' 4/e4ven7%' 4741 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARINGli� ( 1J�IV . RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ��-�J''�f(( REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 'Department : Approved Not Appr v d omments or conditions : 71/ 4/Xik At-b.._ y� Signature of Director or Authorize Representa ive Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 17e II-rfIG (-- NC, }kt FERI M [nj Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : 77'y-oi Lf-e-ct -r-@-Cc ;c, VD L1 c5 al-q SC Jy i fie ea,,,dei,,.Joa 4 ( .sue 8 5 a�1 v I v), IJ b .e- Q P u i ,r fpz,._ %me lee-See'2;-, ,/ Signature o enf Director or Authorized R res ative Date ` REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p Approved Q Not Approved Comments o,r conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p Approved 0 Not Approved Comments or conditions : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p Approved [Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : : (Ti Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department OPolice Department Q Public ks Department Building Div. OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) man e e��P�'/�:/V ✓ DATE : 1/6/71 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 41,677N 6/. LOCATION : 14 APPLICATIONS) : 1 - f ems'4i/-4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ��!!�r-�1'' • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ►� Approved Not Approved omments or conditions : j . Signature ,o ecgr or Authorized Representative ate u t, © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055. oimIL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A co' 235— 2550 O,9gTFQ SEPTE,40 March, 28, 1979 • King, County Resource Planning W-217 , King County Courthouse Seattle , 'Washington 98104 Gentlemen : Enclosed are. copies. of a proposed site plan for your review at the southwest corner of S . W. 16th Street and the East Valley Road , ' within the City of Renton . We Welcome any comments your office may have to offer . on this project. Response by April 6 , 1979 will be appreciated . Thank you. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning_ Director • Wit"i"-r14- aB'v�c�2 Steve. Munson , Assistant Planner Enclosures - SM;sh OF RA, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI i MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17. 235- 2550 0 SEPI.°4t3 March 28, 1979 King County Division of Hydraulics Room 976 King County Administration . Bldg . Seattle , Washington 98104 Gentlemen : Enclosed are copies. of a proposed site plan for your review at, the southwest corner of S .W. 16th Street and the East Valley Road , within the City of Renton . We welcome, any comments your office may have -to offer on this project. Response by April 6 , 1979wi11 be appreciated . Thank you . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . `Ericksen , Planning Director Sys Steve Munson , Assistant Planner Enclosures - SM; sh 7 INTER-OFFICE MEMO CHIEF DARBY 3/17/79 TO: DATE FROM: LT. D.R. PERS.SON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The Austin. Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations • on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area of Maple Ave SW. 3. All fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4. All empty trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW' to Grady Way, then east on Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5 . The roadway..w,i11 be kept clean of all dirt and debris '"AT• ALL TIMES".. 6 . The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 .PM or from 8 AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the 'site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular route for all the trucks coming and going and will not adversely _ effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation 'period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 PM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush. hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours,, however, would be into the 'evening 'rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson OF R.4 A o THE CITY OF RENTON `� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 z amp., CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 93• 235- 2550 AO71, SEP1aer • • March 13, 1979 The Austin Company 800 S .W. 16th Street Renton , Washington 93055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE ' AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE , ' File SP-320-79 ; property located between East ' Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Ave. So. to proposed S .W. 19th Street Dear Mr. Kosteniuk : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 6 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been- set for April 3, 1979 at 9 : 00 a. m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If, you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y ricksen Plannin Director • 7 B y,. • David . Clemens Associate Planner • cc': Paul S . Chiado Metro Industrial District 800 SW 16th St. Renton , WA 98055 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 3 , 1979 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. FRANCIS J . BRIERE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1 , File R-306-79 ; property located in j the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N . E . 2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE, File SP-320-79 ; property located between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Ave. So . to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. HOLMES ELECTRIC , APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN M-P ZONE , File SA-322-79 ; property located at 1500 Raymond Ave. S .W. Applications noted above on file in the Renton ' Planning Department. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 3, 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 23 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION 1 , . ' DAVID R. CLEMENS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 21st day of March 19 79 SIGNED / 1/1(///7 CItTY OF RENTON 5%, 8303 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON q j- 98055 - �Q 19' RECEIVED OF ablijY\ Q-Zrl\--paNUCk ex,d.a,„ ?roc-, (al .00 I � � TOTAL GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY aWE-11xY1f M� -N/77 dx„.„..„ 4 : dat2-4;/. 6' +f'4' - 4 '4"(%-e_ &--er""1" e — o0 (.777) • • • • • . _ • • • . . , Form 76 -• • • • • •. • .• . . • • M-1-60 - • . . • • .• . ' . . •- - • . • . . .• - - .• " • - . . • . . T11 eretneb of:THE ;AUSTIN : COMPANY • • :" • • •.' • Litt DOLLARS, • : . . -•OFFICE .7 • . SIGN HERE j. . • " • .. ;.. .;• ' • PER CHAR....5E.TO SA/0 1/ 5./ / : - ;' • • IN PAYMENT OF PROVED • to' — . . . Nort Ak_ Accoun ing nager — • cae - Date : < • 79L-67 rA /A.)0 dsfx:i4 .nif-TiV Cr . 3-,69-wiSjarge: 't • piLe.h..)61 00c/e."-fir ,3 • -17/0 A us -2g"70a( 4 C'< " 25)( 29z .° • • • • . • • EA) ON HE A Tfi 4. •61-4.1at 41st <6We k.) • -• •- . • • 10 • P1.0 5 ttf 147E .1//0 .0-04 o, 1/44U4- • • - 1_di .3 07, so c yç . 460 •••• /4". 71- 4'4 6 • • • -SO • • . . • 170 7-4-c. et3/ • . . . . • • - • . • ,7-1,-.77-7,72-771P7.71 • •tys., ,s4trist • • • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PECF,IVED' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM MAR 6 19 fir•, • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY D EPnp` Application No. Jrii'. o - /,✓J 7 Environmental Checklist No. 7/7, PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C., RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which. will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 794E Ad.57-JAJ COM OANY 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: ADD S.W. /G STREET i2E/V To/4 . wAs/i.J c r ,J 9 8 o -S 2 o 6 — 226 — 8boo 3. Date Checklist submitted A442CH 2 /97 9 4. Agency requiring Checklist c/T% Oc . k-/s/ra/) PLANIV//JG DE-PT. 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6Rifir/frJ 4a. .0 C'/LL1.J PERm• T 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : ALL 29 AC/2E SirE /A) 7W METRO IA/Dus foe/AL PA,eK — 1• -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Pka /s Lea CArgn LdL rwEE,u 6As r v.4 i i x R0tv10 LfNa LI,Vb AVE. eu.1 T* SOuTH Sr.0E 01 SW /4 STREET Sof.)TH 7`o PA0posEO 5 w /9 Sr'c t r: 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 5'0 °lo GoHAtcir BY S )LY /979 l /oo eh. coitiooLgrr d3Y J'-Y /9So 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : - SPEuaL PERn/r A-o,2 A-/LL/14a /4^40 ate 4DWG 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Ai 0 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: lV o 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: /V o II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YEs- MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements . compaction or over- covering of the soil? x YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? YES MAYBE Alm (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE WU- (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x YET— MAYBE NO, (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x YET— MAYBE Wr Explanation: N Apo (6) C9iiIPAerIo,u ILIJ/, oVE12Q,oV. et/AJG OP T14 CA4.4titG£ /N TroP0a,a0900Aty bi)r ro ,t'l�L • -3- • (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YTS— MITE- VI-6— (b) The creation of objectionable odors? �C Y MAYBE N3— (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES AYE N6— Explanation:, (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE FF (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NU— (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YET— MAYBE NU— (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of • ground waters? )( YET MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , -or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X ! M-AYBE W— (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NT— Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? Y S MAYBE N6— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Y€s" MAYBE N- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? Yrs— MAYBE 1U1 (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? irrg— Mir NX Explanation: (a) b✓ Co r1JG EX/s7iiJ 6/1ASsgs LU17 / r='«L • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES WEE 0 (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YET— RUBY 0 (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier, to the migration or movement of fauna? Y MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE WU— Explanation,: fii4Eite #M Y 8e SOME Lua. i Such A S RA L3[3 e T s FI EL. 1 M I cX E?c • rfrfAr km.z bisPL4aEta ' Y X-1LL/1414 m.vo C.e<Iv/A/G • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES- M YBE i Explanation: , (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? C� YET— MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YEK— MAYBE Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X Yt MMAYBE W Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X Y of an area? ES— MAYBE 0— Explanation: • _5_ (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES M YBE NO Explanation: ' (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES M YBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES- MUTE WU- (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? ?C vrr M B E (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Yam- MBE I0 (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Vim- MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic haz-ards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? Vr MAYBE (— Explanation: • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas :- (a) Fire protection? )4 YES MAYBE NU— (b) Police protection? VES MAYBE NB (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NB (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE alL Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Y!S M-AYBE To -- (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE }ID-- Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? • YES MIT WB (b) Communications systems? Virt-_ WIPE Rif- (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO -6- (d) - Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? Yam- War NU (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of • any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . 7G YES MAYBE Nil -- Explanation: • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YE MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on••my��part. Proponent: / 0-�1` �� ' (signed) /`01quL. !•t/, /COSTEi//vk (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 F , ., 6N Path /\o AFFIDAVIT N\ MAR 6 1979 E an officer of METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, who is . //V ,s+ I ,� , being duly sworn,' _p� `rthat I Paul S iado ant the owner o! the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 26(41y of February , 19 79, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at SPatt1P - 11) (Name of Nota Public) (Signat re of Owner) Donna J. Trulson Paul S. Chiado METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT CAdd0Soi hwPst 16th StrPPt, Renton, WA. 800 Southwest 16th Street (Address) Benton. Washington (City) (State) 226-8800 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me . and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 OF it? ,--\\ CITY OF RENTON • V1 PFEIII6 *P\\ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT + 6 MAR 1979 92 2�N 4 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY GDEPA� File No . SP- 302O 75? Date Rec ' d. G Application Fee $ Oct- 00 Receipt No . p ,311 Environmental Review Fee $ P/`•Od APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800 Address 800 S .W. 16th Street, Renton, Washington 98055 2 . Property location Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Avenue south to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Blocks 19, 20 &23 of C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per Plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats on page 74 , records of King County less lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 of Block 19 , less that portion of Block 19 conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under auditors file No. 3916580 and. No. 4554803 , 4 . Number of acres or square feet 29 acres Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for possible future development. 6 ., The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B, Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: • Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. ��= 1-77r �, - • • • • • • '''' :t tic ,., • :i. �,,1,5,,•; L,r{, Tg- ii� s"'4`'•'^".i ntt'".a�,:„Ri' y' ?�. ,-� 3 .. i'-7 u`;!i 'w i. r',` in F. 1q„ w;yt ti: �Y�.• 4.i.frA , rr,� i.0 '�'1 �`''� F" +J *i •tnr tay, '�:y�, �t'FY' 4.r •�•ci „, l ,,/'" .,,_ r ��++ :} 3•, gy� ;k x 7k. - 4 • ter,=c' • . Q '1bid• dim.17,X 5b. iiil : al 3'1111. 3-113 • :S 47a•, 3 " . . _ a