No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-321 • .fy: Vk,• ♦ .V.i 1�' Y _ t FILE TITLE iq , OPsp .. . : 1 3 izi • • .- . YA ,. r,. 0. s; �: dy • ,4 r . i ;-j. ifs. •.•t Is` r� L sVI tAl i k 41 t 1 4I •'�, •9 • tl Tn 4r j < �84I1 r� r" k n,.� S �Y- I iy .. y •`y, .• y�`y�'.�i..+')". 1t, Y fj £kr S !•ate, Y' £M ` '' PP,c^ y:` e t:a; tiw: r �rr t .::i1s • 1 4. of R4,� ;y © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oea k- CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER .o P`O L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 9lTfD SEPT 'O April 30, 1979 Mr. Paul Kosteniuk Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. SP-321-79; Austin Company (for J. Malcolm Lyle) . Dear Mr. Kosteniuk: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of April 13, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: . Planning Department City Clerk r'r� /c, REC. eb o\\I1� AIR 3v 1979 Y PNVCS �oF F RECFIVE ,.O April 13, 1979 c' it, FILE OF THE LAND USE HEAR1PG EXAMINER APR 1 1979 CITY OF RENTON R ` T D REC NDATION. AV KcIL "c APPLI Austin Company (for J. Malcolm Lyle) FILE NO. SP-321-79 LOCATION: On the north side of N.E. 44th Street east of FAI-405 and west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval of a special permit for fill and grade of approximately +25,000 cubic yards on a four-acre site along N.E. 44th Street east of FAI-405 for possible future development of a motel complex. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on April 5, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 10, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Development Plan Mr. David Clemens, Associate Planner, corrected line three of Section L.4 of Exhibit #1 to read ". . .bottom being one foot below" in lieu of ". . .bottom being one inch below" as denoted in the report. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Paul Kosteniuk Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Kosteniuk indicated concurrence in the recommendations contained within the report. The Examiner then requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. He then inquired if the proposed landfill operation conforms to requirements contained within the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. Mr. Munson indicated that conformance is indicated. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SP-321-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:07 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit for landfill and grading of 25,000 cubic yards on four acres of B-1 zoned property in preparation for a potential motel complex. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. S1--3z1-79 Page Two 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Chapter 23 (Mining, Excavation and Grading) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. According to the Environmental Checklist contained in the file of record, the landfill operation will encompass approximately four months. Upon completion of grading of the landfill, the area will be hydroseeded (Exhibit #2) . 9. The storm drainage ane erosion control methods to be used have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and approved (Exhibit #1) . 10. The proposal must conform to Section 4-2312 (Work in Progress) . 11. Per Section 4-2303.2.0 the final plan for development on the landfill must be approved by the Examiner pursuant to a public hearing. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The landfill and grading operation conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and does not appear to ". . .be an unreasonable detriment to the surrounding area." (Section 4-2303.2.B) . 2. The annual license from the Planning and Public Works Departments (Sections 4-2307.2.B. , 4-2307.4. , 4-2310 and 4-2309) that is required is sufficient to guarantee compliance with Chapter 23 and the Examiner's decision. 3. Access to the site should be reviewed by the Public Works Department to insure adequate traffic safety on N.E. 44th Street. , 110th Avenue S.E. and N.E. 43rd Place. Of particular concern is the curved configuration of N.E. 44th Street. Points of access should be approved by these departments. 4. Since methods of dust and mud control were not proposed or specified, these mitigating methods must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the beginning of the operation. 5. Hydroseeding and other fill stabilization measures must be approved by the Planning Department. Their consideration should include existing vegetation that might assist in this stabilization. DECISION: Approval of Exhibit #2 subject to: 1. Approval of access point(s) by the Public Works Department. 2. Approval of dust and mud control measures by the Public Works Department. 3. Approval of hydroseeding and fill stabilization methods by the Planning Department. 4. Compliance with these conditions prior to beginning the landfill operation. 5. Compliance with all other applicable provisions of Chapter 23 and other regulations and ordinances of the City of Renton. ORDERED THIS 13th day of April, 1979. L. •ick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: George Faucett, 4008 Meadow Avenue N. , Renton, WA 98055 Paul Kosteniuk, Austin Company, 800 S.W. 16th St. , Renton, WA 98055 SP-321-79 Page Three • TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M: Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • Ron Nelson, Building Division • Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City',s Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 23, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably .available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen • (14) days from-the date .of the Examiner's decision. This request,shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. . Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. i .cts 41,k '.F. ;.f Kt.. u, _'1 'r t u. i Y ! ' �... fit i i e. r :w : . . #. r I. ,„jr • ' : GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF FA r405, WEST OF LINCOLN AVENUE N. E. , IN THE 17u0 BLOCK OF N. E. 44TH STREET LEGAL 'DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY z'ROPERTY 0':'1#t E -iS OF r :4).-' U ' • Li �( `µoil• • t TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING NG ON APRIL 10, 1979 BEGINNING . AT 9:00 Ahm. CONCERNING ITEM Z .,''III - ZONE • 6,,,,:7„:� spEcIAL PER ":K ` nr 0 EIJ 0 :A SF-521-791 IHE AUSTIN;CO. �ILE ICI . • SITE APP • VAL ,,�, WAIVER .+SHORELINE ANALE, 7 EM . ,1 .='4" M o 1 III FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550. THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORUZATION r:,` ....,.. ;;�:.!?ins.a_....�....�.,....7..a.ec...y.....,....,.:.l:.r:,s..: :.......`...�.._.__e.v......a.:.:::.e.............._..�...._.....,::..i`:.c:::.�� - .....__...I..,L.....,`.._._...�,._......a.s.r.r..-...,. NOTICE OP PUBLIC HEARING • RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 10 , 19 79 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: • ' 1. BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) , APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-5ITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in ' the, vicinity of N.E. llth and Pierce Ave. N.E. • 2. THE AUSTIN. COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-321-79; property located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. N.E. , in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street. 3. C.H.G. INTERNATIONAL, INC. (EARLINGTOR WOODS) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, File. MP-PUD-78; APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. 'PARKING, File E-244-78; AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. DENSITY, File E-243-78; property located at Hardie Ave. S.W. between Sunset Blvd. W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way. Applications noted above on file in the Renton 'Planning Department. • ALL INTE'RESTED ,PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 10, 1979 AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 30. 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION • 1 , 3TEVE_ M1NsON , HEREBY CERTIFY 'THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE PpSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIO.D Ad0V.,E, AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: SubscribedJ'alid/s,wor'd,, to before me, a Notar% pub14, on th`e 28th day of_LAtith 19 79 . , *.` I SIGNED 42,41404,..41741-44,....0....ers.1 „„,c, w T PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 10 , 1979 APPLICANT : AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE) FILE NUMBER : SP-321-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks approval of a special permit for fill and grade of approximately ±25 ,000 cubic yards on a four-acre site along N . E . 44th Street east of FAI-405 for possible future development of a motel complex. ( Site development map attached. ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : FOSTER RADFORD 2 . Applicant : AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE ) 3. Location : On the north side of N . E . 44th ( Vicinity Map Attached) Street east of FAI-405 and west of Lincoln Ave . N . E . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±4 acres . 6 . Access : Via N . E . 44th Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : B-1 , Business Use . 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : B- 1 , Business District; G-9600 , Residential Single Family . County property to the east : Tract 182 - Community Business Tract 186 - RM- 1800 Tract 187 - RM- 1800 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial . 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record-Chronicle on March 30 , 1979 , and posted in three places on or near ,the site as required by City ordinance on March 29 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1823 dated April 21 , 1960 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site rises from west to east at a grade varying from 4-5 . 5% . Some portions in the center of the site are below street grade. 2 . Soils : Norma Sandy Loam ( No) . Permeability is moderately rapid . The seasonal water table is at or near the surface . Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used mostly for pasture . Drained areas are used for row * S. PLANNING DEPARTMENT \ , PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE) APRIL 10 , 1979 PAGE TWO crops . Kitsap silt loam, 8- 15% slopes ( KpC) . Runoff is medium, and the erosion iazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for timber and pasture . Ragnar-Indianola association , sloping ( RdC) . Permeability is moderately rapid to rapid. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate to se ere . These soils are used for timber. Bellingham silt loam ( Bh) . Permeability is slow. The seasonal water table is near the surface during the rainey season . Runoff i slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight . This soil is used mostly for pasture . A few areas are used for row crops . 3. Vegetation : Medium growth deciduous trees are found in the , : westerly one-third of the site with the remainder consisting of low to medium-growth s rubs and some areas which have been graded . 4. Wildlife : Existing veget tion may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : Standing water was observed in the central and west central portion of the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The site itself and vicinity east of the freeway is presently undeveloped . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area east of FAI-405 is largely undeveloped with the existing uses composed principally of single-family dwellings . To the south is a printing shop and to the west of the freeway , the land uses are a mixture of indu trial , commercial , and some multi - ple family uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Six and e ght-inch water mains run east-west on N . E. 44th Street along t e southern boundary of the subject site. A 12 -inch main exten ' s north-south on Lincoln Ave . N . E . on the easterly border, and an 18-inch sewer main is located along the same street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided b, the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Rout - #240 operates along Lake Washing- ton Boulevard North within 210 feet to the north of the subject site . . 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Recreation : Not applicable . • G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-711 , B- 1 , Business istrict. 2 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavatio , and Grading . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPRE ENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Reports , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17- 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENV, RONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Filling of te site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and increase traffic PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER // PUBLIC HEARING: AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE) APRIL 10 , 1979 PAGE THREE and noise levels in the area . However , through proper develop- ment controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 . Population/Employment: The fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment. However, future commercial use of the filled property will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3 . Schools : Not applicable. 4 . Social : Not applicable . 5 . Traffic : Assuming 25 cubic yards per truckload , 25 ,000 yards would require 1 ,000 truckloads , or 2 ,000 total truck trips . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedures per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the resulting loss in vegetation by site development. K .- AGENCIES/ DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 6 . City of Renton Police Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject site is presently zoned B-1 , Business Use, which will permit future commercial development on the site. The applicant ' s general proposal for a motel would be consistent with the comprehensive planning and zoning for the area . 2 . No specific development plan for the subject property has been submitted at this time . However , the applicant ' s proposed future development will be subject to City of Renton require- ments including the Hearing Examiner ' s site plan approval per Section 4-2303 . 2C of the Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance . 3. The proposed ±25 ,000 cubic yards of fill will be placed on the site to establish an elevation of 36 feet. The existing eleva- tions range from a low point of ±28 feet in the south central portion to a high point of ±50 feet near the southeast corner. 4. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department notes that the temporary sedimentation pond is required to have a 150 cubic feet per acre capacity with the bottom being 1" below the flow line of the outfall . Straw bales should be placed against the outfall pipes to reduce downstream siltation. 5 . The Fire Department advises that for any future development, the required access and hydrants or any other fire protection facilities will have to be installed prior to and during con- struction . These facilities will be required to meet fire flow and uniform fire code requirements for occupancy type . 6 . The Police Department indicates that the contractor will have to keep the adjacent roadways clear and clean of debris , dirt , and rocks . i PLANNING DEPARTMENT \ ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE ) APRIL 10 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 7 . Suitable utilities are available, to the subject site. Standard hook-up fees for water and sewer will apply. See other comments . 8. Subject to compliance with all pertinent sections of Section 4-2300 , and specifically requirements of 4-2312 , this permit should satisfactorily meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage the "highest and best use of property" while "protecting property values within the community for the benefit of residents and property owners , " Land Use Report , 1965 - Objectives . I site . The Engineering 9 . The Jones Avenue sewer crosses the s t g g Division advises that the easement for the sewer shall not be used as a haul road . urther, caution must be taken when tying the proposed fill into the existing fill over the sewer line. 10 . Additional comments of of er departments are attached for consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the foregoing analy is , recommend approval subject to the following conditions : 1 . At all times during the life of this permit , all public roadways adjacent to and plroviding access to this site shall be maintained in a clean and clear condition . 2 . Compliance with the temporary sedimentation and drainage requirements of the Public Works Department. r 3 . Future development of the property shall be reviewed and approved by- the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Section 4-2303-2C. 4. The applicant shall conform to Engineering Division require- ments to protect the existi g sewer line. i I1 I 1,. ,,, ,k, , , . • , Gm6® -1 Il$1 1..7 7e I II I; Ii III v� •c �I i Ho M,/\ . I ,s, .� iaw / ill!Iw I ,Ar ' • a tI fIPco 11 .t.o if/ ;' ' „, . 1>V CHI l 7/`/ ` JJJ I fir • \ / • i6 i•tel'9 I .-1.,\ jz_ •e I ss / / ''I 1 rr`' g�— , 1 ,n 1 I� i tB Q' T0 AiA, :/)// J / Ill '1 I Su; CC, , .,.— j { - ;1 it t L 5 ` ' ` G � Q /%• /'•}y y,+..,..,..w�.i. �k`� •lt/•I z ' I 2 ` . Ili • 1---- I ! I' ! , IIII ! n t I R 7/7)-4.4.1 11.11 .. 7 1 7 ° _ 4 t /- ,/ /40 r SOT. �— 4 1 _in— 107 irn.._ \ \\;.; tii- 5 11-1 ` 1 t tram, I Ir 104 ` 7 i �i �� �•Q��' 4 e, 21- • 1 IUM'S II9 r�. �.j CIENEU 1 r e1 t. Z •I e ' , y� .—. .---90 Ott ® -Jr! 5-_.4 _ \ `-.- I 1 ' / i �1_- _1 a 9V _ .+jj+'1' . sue--kr_1 r— r 08, THE AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE) SP-32.1-79 --- TOTAL AREA ±4 acres 4 APPL I CANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY (FORK J MAL 01 M I } LYLE) `t I PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via N . E 44th Street_ - - - I iEXISTING ZONING - nde_v�1_oped EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE Mot 1 i COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN i COMMENTS t 1 ---------,.<--r,- .--- .-:.—....- ..� 40 y. t- o0 3. ,t . -.4•" `' GX157'CO 1 ., � EXrSr.71•CYP /INv 3cST r7P4zOS - 4 f TAT;3/6 — :C.- "::' " .+'n ;L..,--',.4-.5,••:---f., --" ----:"."t,',..7221 "i%•A.. -;,,..,:72' '''' - -.:''',7_. -- — ';,. ' :. A‘,,,i.• ...„er , ft, ,Nt . kAIIII40 • j / � - - E - isr �i ," ,,`•� Ufc ''. ' � ' ' ' �f fu 11\:. CIO' 41/ ^; ly ) 4.� _ /r• :(: l',.',. __I,1.C. • -t!. \\\I'1' itVi. ' N.' •I Gar '.- *'•� - ':f .40 t .' '� ^ I '�\;�,,• ? 1 Ifs' \\ *4.`\ Iwv�7 -i ;I i'l1.1\\ -,- ,.. \,,,, • ... . . . ________ : , , „ri.; . 1:::.../ , ' -,.., '-' .- :-1 ----I'l ' ,...,--71::1,, ' ' -'. 1.).- :::,..>,--,7• -,:-4'. ''T_-_:._ /. ',.//>:/ '-.,,, ,,„.-.7:, ,, 0 tal Y it ato '. _ 11%.„.e 1 . --/ " -(5°)\ \ 4 . hly 4. • ,... c, - ,/- ,� �� , . +e • #11%11111b6i,. ..'. I , ‘• ' 1 " - r -- -, -i- -�,.. t'-_.•f F m...1-.i 9 . v -.�; - P: r�}-. _i. ,• • ^ ,Q / . -. '_Q` n. a ref - 4 .. v•ti.v5G I-:,Or coR I MON„...„ -• Sr lCiYr'� r -1r( am TACK •"4 931RDPL • I.•3C'P E;X137 21_CM P. ELEV 3G.�Z INV338 , ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department QPark Department 0 Police Department Public Works Department 0 ;6lding Div . • Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description) Traffic Engineering Div . 1 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d signee) ieeiwitz14 , OND DATE : 00? PLE SE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT: 07. 4 dike* 0'.. LOCATION : dike*e ft,o, APPLICATION(.S) : 4')Y' rntl' (71eal P 1 ',,V.,44" IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TH EARING EX N RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . , Department : N t Approv 0211 Approved Comments or conditions : ' �" 7 ;f1= - - ,, Date S gnature of Director or A thorized Representative ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION . I TO: 0 Finance Department 8 Fire Depart ent Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department o Public WorkslDepartment O Building Div. JE ginelering Div. (Please verify legal description ) Traffi'\c Engineering Div. Utilite,s Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his /)4t/D signee ) Nag/4 DATE : I 9 PLE SE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : T : aced&747 C09 APPLICAN // ` LOCATION : e �� APPLICATION(S) : /74,491\ a� IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE\ REPORT TO THE HEARING EX RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep• rtment : 7 .'_,i-i=1=/ C /Ur%/IVY E i A/6 1161 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : ‘, -3/07 Presentative Date of Director or Authorizeld Representative r ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : (J Finance Department gFire Department Library Department s �.J Park Department fir 41 Police Department 2` 0 Public Works Department } , T Building Div . Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . E °> �g Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) D411/D Ni&tiw4 DATE : 49 %9 PLE SE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : 4 I � l,�/• #1, i�4/e * APPLICANT : LOCATION : ® �� , APPLICATION S : A4 6 Q'O ' -J�- o.. 1,eit' ?9 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX N RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /AE [Mr-Approved Not Approved A•iusr "ie-' ,% , €J&, -ti )60.f_�'6^YC Comments o r conditions : fu,7 A4,y Ge;we-_,== e-dic%(;%GfG7;,,,,L,, ,6=pu/, � c c c S S /r,vo _/iG !l y/2 '/hViS U7 /}`may o i 7/ /2 /i/ 6= /0,e� c c; f/3-C7i c.),iL S o/,VS w!C i/o/L�. /clez , l,r� �/ILCc� I`'�i a2 � /�7U/J /OIr,Z/.✓�' f-3.f;�,a;/✓G' C � ? ,� S�/E/JJt-1 � .v ic''ci"c /-' C n �G-CPct//'t-�t6.i Fair' ea;_c '/ilrt�f y' / '/ �LL ' v ,? .7 .. Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U7'io'' .CoL`O L Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : c,i,ic-C ii.> vicc i i►JCo 1•1a. 1.36.),..i 62 621.4la "c._/,t 5 . f).2c sov«y q, / ...:arc, . 1 So, CT F���t ('d,L C' L'[— i / ;121/7 4). I Signature of Director or Authprized Representative Da ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION r TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department OPolice Department ® Public kofcs Dllepartment . ' Quilding Div. QEngineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( igned by responsible official or his d/J54t/D signeee ) P mite DATE : hØ9 PLE SE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : , ,41g* /�/r 2.-...*, , 6,, LOCATION : ��''''yy APPLICATION(S) : i2� 400/ 700P2 / ?1 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (-.?L:TM (%; OULApproved U Not Approved Comments or conditions : ' I -74_ i '2 t"------ -- 17. -77 Signature of Dfrector or Auth rizediRepresentative Date ' II ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION I TO : 0 Finance Department ' Fire Department 8 Library Department ® �rk Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Building Div . ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) II ft/0) DATE : PLE SE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : es .�� 6P 4 1 d ,/,9, t*:# LOCATION : � 0 X.--•.1)1, APPLICATIONS) : A/ eg4t2/ reVadd : OP':- "ei/"° ;79 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED REPORT DEPARTMENTHEARING EX N RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : POLICE DEPARTMENT CEJ Approved Ej Not Approved Comments or conditions : Reviewing the Proposed Fill and Grading Project at NE 44th and I-405 we see no problem to the police department, except that the Contractor will have to keep the adjacent roadways clear and clean of debris, dirt, rocks, etc. This will be brought to the attention of the contractor at the pre- construction conference. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department , IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department rg6lding Div . Engineering IDiv . ® Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designe ) 01 ' / o 6I9 V V ®/ '� 71 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 400- 7 ; Application No . : ® "4/- 7;OP Action Name : /er,410/ 6/Vet 4 J- ,', X--ki5 Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : F/ W Note : Responses to be written lin ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Lam. ,� 1 ! SIGNIFICANT __...4kiNON SI IFICANT Comments : , ),.2: 7:1- (7.;--,„,,,,,\ /„,--_____ 04, 171. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department 111 Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 Building Div . Emgineering - Div . Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designefrp /� �i /` � 0 ��//`��//',��,ee • Application No . : SUBJECT : '� Revieva of ECF- ��. -' ,�— Ac tion Name : gite- __., z., „::.„ i / ivlPlease review the attached . Review requested by (date) : / , .9' Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : i Department : I ! SIGNIFICANT a NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : < / / 1. ( r ,:`C`% i C -(6 1,1._ 54 el/?C' Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department QPolice Department 0 Public marks Department • Building Divl. Engineering 'Div . (2) Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , - (signed by responsible official or his designee ) alai) /0 6/041iiii. v i/ 71 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4'/�I�. � ; Application No . : 12' �� �'— �� \ Action Name : 6/47 i-,.: 14i 1--14., Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : -? ,.` 7,' Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : T7 L' , 1 `• SIGNIFICANT I-NONSIGNIFICANT Comments : `....— „-,-1,..---L / - (--- /72: 1),,J , — -____) -- /2_-, T I Signature f Director or Authorize d\\ Representative Date i 1 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Fjnance Department U Fire Department Library Department i Park Department i Police Department A ® Public Works Department 4' Building Div . ft Engineering Div . 6. gg �-raffic Engineering Div . --- ,h r .�----� Utilities Engineering Di•v . (ys e FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) �j /1 .91_ SUBJECT : Review of ECF ® Application No . : Action Name : 1/6- ,. • Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : ' "- 14 4: i ''''' '' ' , f Note: Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Deyartment : /i0 - l '! SIGNIFICANT 1 l NON SIGNIFICANT/ius j Mce.% /i r ) c'``,_ comments : /emu��4 L�-S 1.-ez !' 1 /zi-u%e_rrc-..7�; C.dA_,.s'-72,e r""i,/z% t//e` - /l'CC4`-S A -4) j e/ /'/Y42/F./7 r7 S �_ flit % e,if /%/C- i'✓eci77j%i 'fi e/L 1 %iC:s c)' --G - /_f i/V-C`/?ZGZ-4.� /°aej as lv /4-it//. 47,G,// ix = 0C1/647/"C/G /� /t(CCS,.� f / Gfi(/i�d /�( /(, CS/JL, ,e W-G///�L�/.,-lc�+ll.� C U��l?�!G //c/✓'0ccr-,//,ig-�/cy� C. / /� /7 `7 �' / , /r/'7/ :"`. R Date Signature of 'irector or Author d Representative REVIIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r ' SIGNIFICANT ' i NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : • Siginature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department S .' k Department 4 Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div. ® Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . 1 FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee)) / ey „e 61011,' v/oi SUBJECT.: Review of ECF 40,-- 51, ; Application No . : - "g/i— , Action Name : 7/,041O' 6,' il/A. Iig ,lt.111 Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : gk7 # -7/ Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : I ! SIGNIFICANT I I NON 'SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE IApplication No . SP-321-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-439-79 �X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant seeks approval of a special permit for fill and grade of approximately ±25 ,000 cubic .yards on a 4-acre site for future development of a motel complex. Proponent AUSTIN COMPANY ( FOR J . MALCOLM LYLE) On the north side of N.E. 44th St. east of FAI-405 and Location of Proposal west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have pg not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is madx is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : This declaration is based on proper development procedures per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the resulting loss in vegetation by site development . Measures;, if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw' its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offi ial Gwrdon Y _ Ericksen Title Pla t'Fnq ecto Date April 3 , 1979 Si gnatuire City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • • Public,Notices ZONE, File.' • 'o FAI-405,•rwest of Lin-i coin Ave. N:E:0.ain, the 1700,block'of N;EN'44th • Street. - -:. Affidavit of Publication 3.'C.H.G.' Int®rriational; Inca(Earlington Woods), applicationnary :fopr,preliprlann- • ms-x' master lan_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ss ed unit development ap-' COUNTY OF KING. proval, File ,MP-PUD- 242-78; appiication for • exception to zoning ordi- nance re.parking,'File E • bein firstdul -•R---Theodor'a---T-h.n-ey g yswornon for exception to zoning • ordinance re. density, oath,deposes and says that.. is the . .. . . . of. File E-243-78; property p y ..she Chief ,G1eI located at Hardie Ave. THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) S.W. between Sunset times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and 1 Blvd. W. and Burlington has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred Northern Railroad Right- 'to, printed•and published in the English language continually as a news- I of-Way. paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, a; Applications noted and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained - NbTICE OF • • above On file in the Re- at the aforesaid place'of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton i•PUBLIC HEARING Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ,� nton Planning Depart- y:°:RENTON LAND USE Superior Court'of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, ,ti--l•t4ARING EXAMINER geninterested person to i. iEi tTON;WASHINGTON said petitions are invited to Washington.T at the annexed is a.....ANA.tiC. mil 4publlc hearing wiL,be g l� tY...Q.� P13b..�.�.�,..>t�.��ring h±ild.;;.by the Renton Land be present at the Public U -Hearing Examiner athis Hearing on April 10,1979 at yfar meeting in the Coun= 9:00 a.m. to express their iiiti; tiambers,City Hall,Re- opinions.. I Re- nter);Washington, on April Gordon Y. Ericksen t Renton Planning Director I as it waspublished in regular issues(and t 1979, at 9:00 a.m. to g r' Published in The Renton not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ,.osider the following pets- Record-Chronicle March 30, ..: Bel Terra Develop- , 1979. R5452. ,. Corp. (Brentwood .' — -` ment, of Il consecutive issues,commencing on the -1?ark- addition), applica- • • Lions for exceptions to rsubdivisions ordinance, .3. day of march ,19,.7.....,and ending the j.,regarding pipestem lots, :soul-de-sac length and ,deletion of turnaround, and 'off-sites improve- day of ' ,19 both dates tnents,files E-317-79,E- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- g Y 1131$-79, and E-319-79; scribers during' all of said period. That the full amount of the fee property located in the vicinity of N.E. 11th and charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..'. which Pierce aqqq I2 ___ has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundre'flYvbr s for the � --- - first insertion and I,application for specie@" f per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent j ; _i.a • insertion. C!/ . . . hie'f'C' "C'I rk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3•O day of March ' 19 7'9 NotaryPu ' i and for the State f Washin to , ERE/V-s, \�®g , `-�'residing at Ken"t,King Cou y. 19113—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill281,effective June 9th, 1955. }141 - Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,adopted by the newspapers of the State. , V.P.C.Form No.87. OF RA,,, A o THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 LOLL AVE.SO. BEISTOM.WASH.MOM 0 , CHARLES J. DELALIRENTI,mvon o PLANNING DEPARTMENT • �,� m• 235- 255® 9c® SEP4EP- March 28 , 1979 s"_..; Amati keno _ .-=- 800 S .W. 16th Street Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE_ EIR '°° ATM F© °v WATOrMiL A ValtVAD 8-1 . ict-,E; ` '"e property located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. NE, in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street. Dear � Sirs: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 14, 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Tiear1 ng xam ner has been set for April 10, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Erickstn Planning 41 ector 7 7 By 67AZ David R. Clemens Associate Planner cci: Foster Radford 10423 Main St. Bellevue, WA 98004 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM VEb oL MAR 14 1979 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 4/ Application No: Environmental Checklist No. 4/3 9 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: ® Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ®Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to, any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with ,your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal When it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the- future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state, and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I, BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent I HE /a LDS T/1.J L3M6'AAJ Y A PPLv/M C L�2 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: MR. -T• / / Ln®L/4 LYLE B Oa .S' W %4. CI ErieEET RE/i i OAv , Ski/Ai C°To , B o E'S 2 - - f'j t 3. Date Checklist submitted AI4Ai2&/ 1 Q71 4. Agency requiring Checklist L'/TY Dr ieE1 JfD.,J % PL/4/VN1Aie 1001 5. Name of proposal , if applicable; RAW ggAD/A-16 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of' its scope and nature) : ILL .A Ain /'RADt 4 At2itE S/ rr -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 4 ,O/ur/as A rrE2 i SsvAiLICC be SuILD/Aja PEEM, r- 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : aeX e i A L PEtekt i )o/Z J=/L L/.)G . a.J D & B/ra/6 10.; Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: YES q DE. th.-5L OP/14.6.) I- Of J10r L G®/+4P LC- X 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 0 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: 13 Di ink)a 1'ER A4, r II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a,) 'Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YET- MAYBE N (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief' features? Y- MAYBE AU- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YE`s- 1AAY B E NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YET- MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES- MAYBE 0- Explanation: (b) AND ee) Cofl A,T/o,J 11-1WO OVE2 ekI)V a. /Ai vr- -rm So/L A-A/0 Al6L ,/ r� e.4 Ain/ DLJE 7-0 /4D ta)/J Fi Lt. � wf s (� -3- �� �� //, RECE1VCD a (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: MAR 1 4 1979 (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air -� quality? ,, ------'''' .. .e .. YE), WU—.4 F (b) The creation of objectionable odors? 7�'P. Y€r- H - ' (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ?C YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? )( YET— MAYBE i (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? �C YE MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N 't (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? IA YEE— MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YET- RATIIE t� (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE 1W Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Y€s— MAYBE RU— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Y MAYBE NU' (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? VET— MAYBE RU— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES WU NIT Explanation: (4-) oVE2 rf€/c'/1,3 G EX i S i/iJ 6 SRAM S' i ' `24 rSEs YJ/T/4 ,A") t_ • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects• or microfauna)? TET- ____ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES BE NO Explanation: (a') T1t'525 MAY 8E Some. 11C)iLOLiJE Slick/ S Rr9 > Ts' A4o LE TWA b /Gz ,e4 (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE O Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YET- MAYBE Explanation: • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land' use of an area? TEE- UTNE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO • (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Y- MAYBE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Yls- MAYBE W Explanation: • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population ' of an area? Y MAYBE Af Explanation: O'fR \44 -5- j RECEIVEb �O (12) Housing. Will the -proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YEs MAR Y R 1999 Explanation: � ___�_._._„ lr. DEP • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: �-...A (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES WEE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE WU- (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? K V- MAYBE NU- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? V RAM- A (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? K YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE Nh (b) Police protection? x YEc MAYBE NU— (c) Schools? YES MAYBE WU— (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ?� YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYbE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ) YES— MAYBE AO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE N� Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YET- MB N�- (b) Communications systems? X Yr PIPIT NU- (c) Water? K YES MAYBE NO -6- (d) Sewer or ,septic tanks? >( YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? )C YET- FATFE (f) Solid waste and disposal? K YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? �G VET- MAYBE Fiji Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES ' MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? )C VET- MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YET- MAYBE Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. THE AUSTIN COMPANY Proponent: Pw• k' L ./710414 Lyle (signed) 1� is/CS TA-Ai/ Fn eT LCoLm 4YLc= (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 - of RENT°� AFFIDAVIT c) MAR 14 19.1 ' 4.IV/Pf - c?P� I► Foster Radford , being duly sworh ---declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 7th day of March , 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle (Name of Notar Public) (Signature of/wner) 8414 8th Avenue SW, Seattle, WA 44/3 , 24,,. / i (Address) (Address) (City) (State) • (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to therules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: I ' Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON (.6'\ a�CF�IIEDAPPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 141979 ......,,,....tea---�44/� FOR OFFICE USE ONLY "�N/N G Dti Q % 4 File No . SP- '3.2/- 7/ Date Rec' d. Application Fee $ /e' 3e ,0 0 Receipt No . d � aEnvironmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY/ MpplyJincialglm Lyle Phone 206-226-8800 Address 800 S.W. 16th Street, Renton, Washington 98055 2 . Property location 1700 Block of N.E. 44th Street. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) FAI 405 and N.E. 44th Street. -,The south three acres of Tracts 183 and 184 of C. ' D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden addition. Except portions thereof condemned by the State of Washington for highways by construction order #613780, January 3 , 1964 . 4 . Number of acres or square feet 4 acres Present Zoning B-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Fill and grade property for future development of hotel complex. 6 ., The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '. C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area. (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Sect .on 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action • Remarks Planning Dept. 1-777/ . . .... . r•.: ri 4:' "..,,. ' igi .-'. ,,,,.:', 4 • t"'i .1"A''''' DA 11.'4" .„,. ye , A • I:0 '''( ki‘ .A, 1,.. tk:. l'' Cit X.; t: '''''''`-`` ri,' V,;,.1:. ..';'`., .....v4T., I'? e'f'1, ,- .g.' t ."0.1 is'.,.. 4:".'I • + ..,4 t'..... . • 4,,..: li t., ,..... i! ...,•:', t ,-,— cet,-, 5 ?A.-,•••• .. re .1,-.7 ...: . .1.:: ..7.'‘) . '4.., .1r•.:.' •.."1;‘-..,•...,s'''. r-,11 • • • . • • FILE TITLE • 6 p s„, 3 z I mew 7 q . . . • •• • . . .....:‘,..„..,:i.„ . • . "..,0,.... ...„, 7,...i, i..t., ,,. . . .„4.:.1 ,..... It . A!' • • •r.,,,;,i, ,..r, ki V:i 1 • ,..C.i.. N• if.'.,• ..'t }4'1.'••'7.tAZA``''''';'?". . ) y, A.,- 3i# 41,- -- !...i. • -...t.`,... iiSm' 1.. .. . p.i.• 1';i ..i411111116' "i, ,. ka . ..ii..----4 4 p*.i issleer P',..t. ..,,,. . g.::;:,1). • ,„;44,,,, ,,..,, `k,,' A tk! $11,-; ,-,-.:1,.,,,,, ,,,%.- -0 ')1r, 1,:f 1 t'1 -r &) ...S. WI hr?".#1 4''%V.,, ,,,.,.:47.i., . . r,.z1 Om: T.,' ,,ry.. . '44 • A ."..., qr;.!.. e,'," qzgz "..i1-1*.., ,. •P., •:" IA Ic., -*.k.• , t.... trii. 7.—)14..,,,,,,- fr.,, "`'..A.1•1;•4, 1:,_ k-, ii,:. ,,,efo,-... .71;7: 'NorPt,".- ' ' '''4.. ' ' ' . k..1.1Pe. ' ' ,,,ttl' '..,:dt1)- • ,t,:%. '.0,`, l't. '',4,1:fc,,,,W4. ',;4A1..,.P' itge • . '•II/..1.?.k4".'41' ,e'•,'i^"I'v . '' . “.67'. . -..'-',•t-Y.T.'64" • • . , • • . • 1 . • . . - . •• • . . • • • - . . . .. I