HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 11/15/2004AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
November 15, .2004
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Municipal Arts Commission Recognition Awards
4. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed ordinance regarding abandoned shopping carts
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 8, 2004. Council concur.
b. Community Services Department submits CAG-04-101, Maplewood Golf Course 8th Green and
Hillside Drainage; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the
amount of $147,240.49, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$7,092.51 to Buchanan General Contracting Company, contractor, if all required releases are
obtained. Council concur.
8. CORRESPONDENCE
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Museum Master Plan Consultant Hire
b. Public Safety Committee: Municipal Jail Bookings & Fees
c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Main Ave. S. Speed Limit Increase
10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Ordinance for second and final reading:
Designating a Planned Action for the Lakeshore Landing Development (1st reading 11/8/2004)
11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
Council Conference Room
5:00 p.m.
Emerging Issues
Council Chambers
5:30 p.m.
2005 Budget Presentation and Deliberations
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
A
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
November 15, 2004
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
DON PERSSON, Council President; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON;
COUNCILMEMBERS
DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW; TERRI BRIERS; MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief
ATTENDANCE
Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney;
BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; JENNIFER HENNING,
Principal Planner; BEN WOLTERS, Economic Development Director; DEREK
TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER KATHLEEN MCCLINCY,
Police Department.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Michael O'Halloran, Municipal Arts Commission member, recognized Diana
Board/Commission: Municipal Hagen for her six years of service on the Municipal Arts Commission. Praising
Arts Commission Recognition her organizational skills, her support of the arts, and her "behind the scenes"
Award work, Mr. O'Halloran presented Ms. Hagen with a certificate of appreciation.
Ms. Hagen expressed her gratitude for the opportunity to have served on the
commission, and she named her favorite projects, including the Young
Musicians Showcase, the Meet the Artists Series, and the Rentennial
Celebration. Additionally, she noted the importance of committee, board, and
commission volunteers to the City of Renton.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Streets: Shopping Cart accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Abandonment public hearing to consider the proposed ordinance regulating abandoned
shopping carts.
Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner, explained that this issue has been in the
Planning and Development committee for two years. Abandoned shopping
carts, which can be found along sidewalks, in streets, in parks, in school
grounds, and at bus stops, create visual blight and present a potential safety
hazard because the carts may restrict emergency vehicle access.
Ms. Henning referred to RCW 9A.56.270 which states that it is unlawful to
remove a shopping cart from the parking area of a retail establishment without
permission, provided the cart is labeled with specific information. She noted
that Renton has adopted the RCW citation by reference in City Code; however,
abandoned carts are not otherwise regulated by the State or Renton. Ms.
Henning reported that from July through September, City maintenance workers
impounded nearly 400 shopping carts.
Continuing, Ms. Henning reviewed the draft ordinance, which would: declare
abandoned shopping carts to be a nuisance; require businesses to prepare and
submit cart containment and cart retrieval plans to the City; provide for the
impoundment and retrieval of carts; and establish fees and fines. She pointed
out that the cart containment plan may rely on solutions such as locking wheel
systems, bollards (physical obstructions), or coin return kiosks.
Al
November 15, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Pabe 407
Ms. Henning stated that staff recommends public testimony be accepted
regarding the proposed ordinance, and that the matter remain in Planning and
Development Committee to further consider enacting legislation that regulates
abandoned shopping carts.
Noting the reduced resources of the City, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler pointed out
that taxpayer dollars are being used to impound the carts and to figure out a
solution to this problem. She stressed that ultimately, it is the responsibility of
the store and the customer.
Public comment was invited.
Monique Marcano, 715 Harrington Pl. SE, #2141, Renton, 98058, supported
the use of bollards, and the listing of the fines on the shopping carts. She also
suggested that the stores be fined per cart.
Lee Trutmann, Safeway Store Manager (Highlands), 4300 NE 4th St., Renton,
98055, reported that store employees routinely retrieve carts from the
surrounding neighborhood. He acknowledged the importance of the issue, and
noted that a shopping cart costs $300. Mr. Trutmann stated his concern that
stores will bear the responsibility, via fines, for the abandoned carts, when it is
the customers that are taking them off the premises. He suggested that the
customers also be fined. Mr. Trutmann inquired as to possible subsidies for the
preventative measures, and stressed that the responsibility should be balanced,
especially if a store is doing all that it can to reduce the number of abandoned
carts.
Continuing, Mr. Trutmann noted the store's small profit margin, and stated that
the costs associated with implementing measures such as locking wheel systems
and employing personnel to monitor the parking lot is significant. He indicated
that his store is willing to accept responsibility as long as it is reasonable, and
he welcomes suggestions to improve the situation.
In response to the Mayor's inquiry regarding the pursuit of shoplifters versus
the theft of a shopping carts, Mr. Trutmann stated that customers do not
understand the ramifications of taking carts, and he does not want to lose their
business.
Responding to Councilwoman Palmer's inquiry regarding signage on the carts,
Mr. Trutmann indicated that his store's carts are signed to state that is unlawful
to remove the cart from the premises; however, it is not a great deterrent.
Councilwoman Nelson stated that she lives near the store, and suggested that he
work with the nearby apartment owners. Councilman Clawson acknowledged
Mr. Trutmann's efforts to retrieve the abandoned carts, but pointed out that
some stores are not making much of an effort.
Council President Persson suggested that stores offer a monetary reward for the
return of the carts. Councilman Law thanked Mr. Trutmann for his comments,
stating that a reasonable compromise can be reached.
In response to Mayor Keolker-Wheeler's comments, Mr. Trutmann agreed to
ask Safeway's corporate office whether Safeway would be willing to prosecute
if a customer is cited for stealing a cart.
Dave Richard, Safeway Store Manager (Fairwood), 17230 140th Ave. SE,
Renton, 98058, stated that he wants to be involved in the development of the
ordinance. He indicated that he actively retrieves abandoned shopping carts,
November 15, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 408
and emphasized that he does not want his store to be held in the same standing
as stores that are not as diligent about retrieving their carts. The Mayor stated
that his input is welcome, but pointed out that the Fairwood Safeway is not
under Renton's jurisdiction.
Councilman Clawson noted that a police officer can only stop someone when
there is reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. Mr. Persson
agreed that some storeowners are not as responsible as others, and suggested
that measures for the return of carts be instituted when a new store is built.
Councilman Corman suggested that the phrase "return fee" be used instead of
"fine."
A letter was read from Mary M. Loftin, Vice President, Public Affairs, Fred
Meyer Stores, Inc., PO Box 42121, Portland, OR, 97202, stating that Fred
Meyer is committed to resolving the cart abandonment issue in Renton. She
expressed her concerns about the content of the proposed ordinance, and
suggested the following: the acceptance of the business name as the only
required labeling on the carts, the exemption of retail establishments from the
proposed ordinance if they install a cart retention system, and the equitable
enforcement of the requirement to patrol a preset radius around the store.
Continuing, Ms. Loftin said that Fred Meyer believes an additional regulator
burden is not necessary, and is willing to support the control of shopping carts
using existing City ordinances and the desire to be a responsible corporate
citizen. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL
REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted
included:
• A free copy of the 2005 Renton Community Calendar will be distributed to
Renton residents as an insert in the December lst edition of the Renton
Reporter.
• Upcoming holiday events include: Clam Lights at Gene Coulon Memorial
Beach Park on December 3rd at 6:30 p.m.; Holiday Tree Lighting at the
Piazza on December 4th at 5:00 p.m.; and the Argosy Boat Serenade at
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park on December 5th at 6:00 p.m.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Linda Marweg, 2201 Smithers Ave. S., Renton, 98055, expressed her gratitude
Citizen Comment: Marweg - for the street improvements on Smithers Ave. S. and the City's attention to the
Smithers Ave S Traffic concerns of the residents. She reported that the recently installed speed hump
Concerns, Renton School has improved the situation. Additionally, Ms. Marweg voiced her appreciation
District Activities for the reporting of the Renton School District activities at the Council
meetings.
Citizen Comment: Elliott - Sharon Elliott, 114 Wells Ave. S., Renton, 98055, reported that she was
Damaged Sewer Line, Wells informed of her responsibility for replacing the damaged 30-foot side sewer
Ave S from her property line to the City's sewer main located in the street. She stated
that she replaced the sewer line on her property approximately ten years ago,
V%
November 15, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 409
and at that time was unaware that she was responsible for the additional 30 feet.
Ms. Elliott noted that construction by the City or some other party could
damage that portion of her side sewer, and expressed concern regarding the
permitting of such work. Additionally, she said she was told that the City of
Renton does not have the resources to inspect the permitted work
Councilman Corman clarified that City inspectors cannot catch everything, but
permitted work is inspected. Councilman Clawson stated that he had spoken
with Ms. Elliott and told her that by issuing permits, the City does not become a
guarantor of the work that is done by the contractor. He explained that it is cost
prohibitive for inspectors to watch the work of contractors every step of the
way from start to finish.
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman reported
that the City's wastewater crew conducted a video inspection of Ms. Elliott's
side sewer. Examination of the type and location of the breaks in the sewer line
resulted in a determination that the damage was not caused by construction
activity, but rather by the aging of the line. Mr. Zimmerman assured that every
pipeline under permit is inspected, and he pointed out that if there is reason to
believe that damage was caused by construction, the responsible party would
have to repair the line. He added that if construction damaged a sewer line,
problems would most likely occur within days or a week from the time of
construction and be traceable back to the responsible party.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 8, 2004. Council concur.
November 8, 2004
CAG: 04-101, Maplewood Community Services Department submitted CAG-04-101, Maplewood Golf
Golf Course 8th Green and Course 8th Green and Hillside Drainage; and requested approval of the project,
Hillside Drainage, Buchanan authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $147,240.49,
commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$7,092.51 to Buchanan General Contracting Company, contractor, if all
required releases are obtained. Council concur.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report regarding the
Community Services
consultant hire for the Museum Master Plan. The Committee met to discuss
Committee
this issue on 8/5/2002. At this time, there does not appear to be any support for
Community Services: Museum
this issue. Therefore, the Committee recommended that this referral be closed.
Master Plan, Consultant Hire
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.*
Councilwoman Briere voiced her objection to the closing out of this matter.
*MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL
RECONSIDER THE MOTION CONCURRING IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL HOLD THIS
TOPIC IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
November 15, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 410
Public Safety Committee Public Safety Committee Chair Law presented a report recommending
Police: Jail Bookings and Fees concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept jail bookings from other
municipalities on a space available basis, provided that staff develops language
acceptable to the Council regarding liability coverage prior to entering into
contracts. It is also understood that a booking fee of $64.83 will be collected
from all individuals, either personally at the time of booking into the Renton
jail, or paid directly by the contracting cities. The Committee also
recommended preparation of the ordinance and resolution implementing the
contracts and fees. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report regarding
Committee the Main Ave. S. speed limit increase. The Committee met on 11/21/2002 to
Transportation: Main Ave S discuss this issue. At this time, the Committee recommended that no changes
Speed Limit Increase from 25 be made to the current speed limit. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
to 35 mph CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
ORDINANCES
adoption:
Ordinance #5107
An ordinance was read designating a Planned Action for the Lakeshore Landing
Planning: Planned Action
development, approximately 55 acres located between Logan Ave. N. to the
(Lakeshore Landing), Boeing
west and Garden Ave. N. to the east, N. 8th St. to the south, and east of the
Surplus Property
Boeing manufacturing operations on the west. MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
Councilman Clawson announced that there is an open house on November 16th
ESA: WRIA 8 Draft Chinook
from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at the Maplewood Golf Course Club House for
Salmon Conservation Plan
comment on the draft Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:54 p.m.
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
November 15, 2004
n
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 15, 2004
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/22 Emerging Issues
(Persson) 5:00 p.m. *Council Conference Room
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE
(Corman)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Palmer)
UTILITIES
(Clawson)
5:30 p.m. 2005 Budget Presentation and
Deliberations
*Council Chambers*
MON., 11/22 Vouchers;
4:30 p.m. Edlund/Korum Property Lease &
Caretaker Agreement with Leroy Coffman
4
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
TY
♦ 'i
City of Renton
PUBLIC INFORMATION HANDOUT
November 15, 2004
.Proposed Ordinance Regulating Abandoned
Shopping Carts
For additions' [information, please contact: Jennifer Henning, Project Manager; City of
Renton Development Services Division; (425) 430-7286
ISSUE:
Approximately 30 businesses in Renton provide shopping carts for their customers.
Over the past two years, staff noted that shopping carts have increasingly been
stranded away from the retail stores. During a two -month period from July to
September, City maintenance workers impounded nearly 400 shopping carts. These
carts were found discarded along sidewalks, in the street, on park or school grounds, at
transit stops, and near apartment buildings.
Abandoned shopping carts create visual blight and create a potential hazard if left on
public right-of-ways. RCW 9A.56.270 states that it is unlawful to remove a shopping
cart from the parking area of a retail establishment without permission, provided the cart
is labeled with specific information. Abandoned shopping carts are not otherwise
regulated by the State of Washington or the City of Renton.
City staff drafted an ordinance that, if adopted, would regulate abandoned shopping
carts. This ordinance is similar to regulations adopted in California, Nevada, Arizona
and Hawaii. The ordinance would: declare abandoned shopping carts to be a nuisance;
require businesses to prepare and submit cart containment and cart retrieval plans to
the City; provide for the impoundment and retrieval of carts; and establish fees and
fines. Staff is seeking public comment on the draft ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Services Division recommends that the Council accept public
testimony regarding the proposed ordinance. Further, Development Services
recommends that the Planning and Development Committee meet to further consider
enacting legislation regulating abandoned shopping carts.
13
�;,gs �,. •,��.,,a�,:#+aa'x�����"'.�$i,y, �j'Ss j° �^�S''Y ,��'��',�m ��.sr, �` :.�i
a�
02,
A.
� t �x � n,,, � _ ��e• � 4 � �� 1 .�� � �'� ,tea r . �-. 7 .
4f �-
-k-:
to a
Z'
Frs.A,.
f sues
• Shopping Carts are being abandoned
within the City, resulting in:
✓ Potential safety hazards
✓ Blight
• Renton does not regulate abandoned
shopping carts
x'
��€ "' s ��t ••_ a.{€� o-x`ie� '-n �� �:' ». .��{A,t. � $ 'a [{y �4¢ .f.'" g �, ",�, ram'^ ,���� i�� :� �* „ ,#
fie. �F � iy, �. � `A [ � � 4a ..�'. �.� is � aii� Yy4.; � i ��` �" •�
��•�" �d;'� y�t � w .. °, .„. �i, yn n � � ,�� may...., ,�a,, .
77,77
j "m3
EL
Eye
� � y � T �'� •� � $$gg � jj Q � a' 'nt ®F � ' .P9 'u' —VI
�°¢� `,$g . :( -�!g6 g i &'" t►`'.`,g w�
� u„
misdemeanor to remove
W
u
Mt
,'a_
71 .,.s
Renton City Code adopts by reference the State law; s
however, no other state or city laws regulate shopping carts.
�. ,E �.a4 r, �i �.'CJ� ,y 9'�jg^ ts� *�- � ,4+i�+Rc" �'�r��q�
_�_......�.u,,,,,:�..�r�;'.�..�.,'"�.?r,�,:. �`t _�, _s, - r., .� -, ,. - , .�, �:;a,.. .z;;;: „� _ .
-saa3laom aDueuajuiew A4!0 Aq papalloa woo s:ae:)
6uiddoLls pp-p Apeou 'aagLuajdaS t16noagl Alnr Luoa-q
y a� y
-. '
���+•N�# -�'�uy "gin a�yy� ���; s wF ,__3 ;�._ ��y"�"a'Nn� �:_e"�a-n.+r y�z .._. �^ �"'� t� � �!�w
s
a v»•Ai
i
77�F'of
oval WWWM"�
Al
MI
As a courtesy., merchants were notified, and most of the
carts were reclaimed by the retailers
L
>-
....;wol
` "B.yrnrr��s.+.^„K,�,�,. ;.�;�,.. .: ;" "�•. .. _... y�.. ": ".�'-`i -
T.x x,., :s}."wri '*..
':......_.*""»w+�'.,; _: s 4.'pxy'�... ""s�a�
g
.,g"`c.
:`'` '�
SFt
pannainaa uaaq aneq salels milo
woal saaueuipao jo saldwexa pue '.iawwns 941 Inogf no i4l
pajauq uaaq seq aall!w uo:) juawdo19naa Ig 6uiuueld
�, .a+ x � ,� . ; -_ ��, „w, m: ..-^-'. ,� ,., ., ... ,�, ..v� s .� -��` -.t: ro mm. °•""x.-r• .,w� ?•;;�.w ;ten - -,:„t^ Muw, w«:+._� -w:. a''w9'. "�� .,�.t�iC' �l" �y
�'..-
a5.
.t
a ..
Xj
r fin;,
JE
b y
1:=B
_� jP ��C2r !��p� •yid � #T�� �
r z J
s, ..AM,s
s x� s
p } s _ m _ . . e.. - .4
_..
P' J T p�
Cart Containment Plan
• Identification of Shopping Carts with a permanently affixed
sign:
- Identifying owner/business, or both
- Notifying public that unauthorized removal is a violation of law
- Providing address and phone for return/retrieval
• Notice to Customers
• Employee Training
• Collaboration with Other Businesses
I
Cart Containment Plan...
oil
�1=
low
YII�, It "IT 4i
two 11VO
. . . . . . . . . . . ......
a
a rt p 12
a rt p 12
�r � xa n c e allows o r
Immediate retrieval by
the City of lost, stolen or
abandoned shopping
carts...
...or, impoundment with
or without Notice
RIK-
Ji
Z�r
,i �. �S Y'g
# , r � —
? ezr
O
°
5 "
§ ry F
__.. . d �'�.'�: �� x9'.,3 a _�� iS..R-> ���>�... �. e$a� � 3.'., .� s ® �.. _ •h..,i. °i 'B i
Rm S,:_ -0�
m @VA �i TMWIRTAVO
[�" 4
T "ti.w m
ZIKGIvrm
dCLUa
I
CC
owner
} ., sted F
• Up to $75 for each occurrence (all shopping carts
collected within cone-day period).
• Fine is triggered by more than 3 occurrences
within 6 months.
Developmei
• The Ci
ordinanc
• Planning
enacting legislatio
the proposed
er consider
carts.
11/15/2004 17:34 V FRED MEYER PUBLIC AFFRIRS 4 914254306516
NO.3Y2 U001
FRED MEYER STORES • P.O. Box 42121
November 15, 2004
Wharf onyour list today?You'll find it at
oy
FredMeyer 1/
Portland. OR 97242-0121. 3800 SE 22nd Ave. - Portland, OR 97202-2918. 503 232-8844 - httpjtwww.fredmeye.r.com
Don Persson, President, Renton City Council
Renton City Council
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
VIA FAX: (425) 430-7300, (425) 430-6516
RE: LUA04-118 Abandoned Shopping Cart Ordinance
Dear Council Members,
NOV 1 5 2004
F'-CFIVED
CITY CLERKS OFFICE.
We hereby submit this document as public comment at the City Council meeting
scheduled for Monday, November 15, 2004.
As a good corporate citizen, Fred Meyer is committed to helping resolve the cart
abandonment issue in the City of Renton- Although we support the intent of the proposed
Ordinance, we believe there are significant concerns raised by the content. Some of these
concerns include:
Section One - PURPOSE. DECLARATION OF NUISANCE, states that shopping
carts are a "potential hazard to the health and safety of the public". Our company
believes that the cart(s) itself pose no inherent hazard to the public. In addition,
we would be interested in the City demonstrating any incident where carts have
been a hazard to the health and safety of the public.
Section Three CART CONTAINMENT PLAN Identification of Shopping Carts,
States that carts must have the business name, address, telephone number and
notification of violation of city law. Fred Meyer currently labels carts with the
business name. We recommend that the business name be accepted as the only
required labeling. Most retail outlets, using large numbers of shopping carts, are
well known by the community and further identification should not be necessary.
Section Three, CART CONTAINMENT PLAN. Exemptions, Fred Meyer does
not think this proposed Ordinance is necessary; business management has
necessitated the installation of cart retrieval systems in other urban .locations. A
complete exemption to the proposed Ordinance should be given to those retail
establishments that install a cart retention system. These systems activate a wheel
locking mechanism at a predetermined line, such as the property line, thereby
keeping carts from being removed from the retail establishment. Such systems
that satisfies them best." Fred G. Meyer, Founder,1886 i978
"Always strive to offer Customers the service, selection, quality and price
11/15/2004 17:34 FRED MEYER PUBLIC AFFAIRS 4 914254306516 N0.372 P002
cost approximately $40.000 to install and an additional $8,000 per year in
maintenance. Installing such a system would be going above and beyond the
requirements of the ordinance and therefore shows good faith.
Section Four, MANDATORY ABANDONED CART PREVENTION PLAN
It is vital to have shopping carts available and in good working order for our
Customers. Fred Meyer expends many resources to purchase, repair, and retain
shopping carts. These carts are an asset without which our Customers cannot be
served. Therefore, cart retrieval is part of our daily store operations activities.
Fred Meyer has concerns regarding cart retrieval as carts can be abandoned on
both public and private property. An ordinance requiring retrieval can potentially
expose a company employee to trespassing or other dangerous conditions. In
addition, insurance companies for Fred Meyer limit the employees who can work
outside Fred Meyer property.
Section Seven RETRIEVAL AND IMPOUND PROCEDURES, Retrieval of
Shopping Carts. If the retail establishment is required to patrol a preset radius
around their location "not less often than every 48 hours," how will fair and
equitable enforcement by the City be handled?
Carts typically leave the property with Customers who live near by, who use mass transit,
or who walk a long distance out of choice or due to economic limitations. Aggressive
action against any of these causes should be carefully evaluated by the City to avoid other
issues being manifested.
This proposed Ordinance also makes a responsible retailer a victim of theft. A cart taken
from an owner can be reportable theft. The retailer is penalized by the loss of the cart,
the loss of customer use, the expense to retrieve the cart and the potential burden of this
proposed Ordinance.
Fred Meyer understands some of the concerns being addressed by the City in this
proposed Ordinance and is willing to support the control of shopping carts using existing
City ordinances and a desire to be a responsible corporate citizen. A profitable business
must manage its assets and meet the needs of the community. Fred Meyer believes this
additional regulatory burden is not necessary.
I can be contacted for additional comments at (503) 797-7901.
Sincerely,
Mary. i ftin
Vice President, Public Affairs
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 15, 2004
TO: Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
GENERAL INFORMATION
• Information about Renton is featured in the 25"' Anniversary edition of the Greater Seattle InfoGuide, a popular
relocation guide for people looking to move to the Puget Sound Region. This year, publishers of the guide
selected a photo of the Renton IKEA Performing Arts Center to feature with the Renton information.
ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• A free copy of the 2005 Renton Community Calendar will be distributed to Renton residents as an insert in the
December I" edition of the Renton Reporter. Funded by the City of Renton, Renton School District, Renton
Technical College, and Valley Medical Center, the community calendar spotlights various public services. In
addition, it includes information about activities in Renton, school and City holidays, facts about Renton, a
detailed map, and useful phone numbers.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• On Monday, November 15"', at the Renton Senior Activity Center, 150 flu shots were given to seniors by staff
from Visiting Nurse Services, the agency that provides Health Services at the Center.
• The Hassle Free Holiday Bazaar at the Renton Community Center will feature over 100 vendors presenting a wide
variety of handcrafted items. The Bazaar is open on Friday, November 19t", from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and on
Saturday, November 20'h, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Admission is free.
• Volunteers will serve a Thanksgiving meal to seniors at the Renton Senior Activity Center on Thursday,
November 25"'. The Center will be open from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for seniors to enjoy a day of social and
recreational activities. A free holiday meal will be served at 11:45 a.m. Seniors must pick up a free ticket prior to
Tuesday, November 23`d, for their meal reservation and transportation request. For additional information, call
the Senior Center at 425-430-6633.
• Join in the holiday spirit and participate in the Angel Tree Program. Trees with tags representing requests from
families screened by the Renton Salvation Army will be available this year at three city locations - Renton
Community Center, City Hall, and Carco Theatre. For more information about this program, please call the
Salvation Army at 425-255-5969.
• Mark your calendar now for upcoming holiday events, including Clam Lights at Coulon Beach Park on Friday,
December 3`d, at 6:30 p.m.; the Holiday Tree Lighting at the Piazza on Saturday, December 4"', at 5:00 p.m.; and
the Argosy Boat Serenade at Coulon Beach Park on Sunday, December 5"', at 6:00 p.m.
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
• A public review period on the draft Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan runs from November 12t" to December
16'h. Beginning on November 12"', the draft plan can be accessed through King County's website at
www.metrokc.gov and a copy is available for review at the City Clerk's Office in Renton City Hall. To allow the
Renton community to comment on the draft Plan, an open house will be held on Tuesday, November 16t", from
6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the Maplewood Golf Course Club House, 4050 Maple Valley Highway. Additional
open houses will be held in December in Bothell, Redmond, and Seattle. For further information, call 206-296-
8249.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #: I I 2
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: November 15, 2004
Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/ Parks/ Golf
Staff Contact...... Leslie Betlach (ext. 6619)
Agenda Status
Kelly Beymer (ext. 6803)
Consent ..............
Subject:
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
8th Green Reconstruction and Hillside Drainage
Ordinance .............
Buchanan General Contracting Co.
Resolution ............
CAG—04-101
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract Study Sessions......
Copy of Final Pay Estimate Information.........
Copy of Application and Certificate of Payment
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $154,333.00 Transfer/Amendment......
Amount Budgeted....... $180,000.00 Revenue Generated........
Total Project Budget $180,000.00 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Community Services Department submits CAG-04-101, Bch Green Reconstruction and Hillside
Drainage for final pay estimate and release of retainage. The project started on September 15th,
2004 and was completed on October 27th, 2004. The contractor, Buchanan General Contracting
Co., fulfilled the terms of their contract by completing all aspects listed in the scope of work.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of
$147,240.49, commencement of the 60-day lien period, and release of the retained amount of
$7,092.51 to Buchanan General Contracting Co, contractor, once all required releases are obtained.
�1.4
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bb
State of Washington
Department of Revenue
��� PO Box 47474
REVENUE Olympia WA 98504-7474
Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) 600 562 847
Date 11/1/04
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
From:
City of Renton
Tracy Schuld
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Assigned To
Date Assigned
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below
Description of Contract
Contract Number
Maplewood - 8"' Green Reconstruction and Hillside Drainage
CAG-04-101
Contractor's Name
Telephone Number
Dennis S. Buchanan, Buchanan General Contracting Co.
425-462-1326
Contractor's Address
P.O. Box 40069, Bellevue, WA 98015-4069
Date Work Commenced
Date Work Completed
Date Work Accepted
09/ 15/04
1 10/27/04
10/29/04
Surety or Bonding Company
—delity & Deposit Company of Maryland
,,ent's Address
Steve Lepere, Zurich Surety, 999 3rd Avenue #3350, Seattle, WA 98104
Contract Amount $ 141,850.18
Additions $ + 0.00
Reductions $ — 0.00
Sub -Total
Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 8.8 %
(If various rates apply, please send a breakdown.)
TOTAL
Comments:
$ 141,850.18
$ 12,482.82
$ 154,333.00
Liquidated Damages
Amount Disbursed
Amount Retained
Signature
Type or Print Name Tracy Schuld
Phone Number 425-430-6918
TOTAL
$ 0.00
$ 147,240.49
$ 7,092.51
$ 154,333.00
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue,
PO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO
YMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in
--cordance with said certificate.
To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753-3217. Teletype
(TTY) users please call (800) 451-7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.gov.
REV 31 0020e (6-27-01)
DATE: November 1, 2004
TO: Tracy Schuld, Finance Department
'ROM: Kelly Beymer, Golf Course Manager
,.;ONTRACTOR: Dennis S. Buchanan, Buchanan General Contracting Co.
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course 8th Green Reconstruction and Hillside Drainage
CONTRACT NO.: CAG-04-101
FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE
$141,850.18
2. SALES TAX @ 8.8%
$12,482.82
3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE
$154,333.00
4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR
$0.00
5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE
$134,757.67
6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT
$134,757.67
7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $0.00
8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $7,092.51
9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE $7,092.51
10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $0.00
11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $12,482.82
2. SUBTOTAL $12,482.82
* (95% x Line 1)
** (RETAINAGE @ 5%)
GRAND TOTAL $154,333.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION
PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (LINES 5 AND 11) No. 1 $147,240.49
Account 424.000000.020.5940.0076.60.000008
RETAINED AMOUNT (LINE 8) No. 1 $7,092.51
Account 424.000000.020.5940.0076.60.000008
TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $154,333.00
CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965
I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE
BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN,
AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND
THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM.
6.2.4 Changes to Applicable Land Use Policies and
Regulations
During any vested period, should Renton amend its Land Use Policies and
Regulations, Boeing may elect to have such amended Policies and Regulations apply
to Redevelopment; provided, that the Development Services Director must agree to
such election, which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Renton reserves the authority under RCW
M.70B.170(4) to impose new or different regulations, to the extent required by the
federal or state governments, or by a serious threat to public health and safety, such as
changes or additions to the family of building and fire codes, as determined by the
Renton City Council, after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to
Owner.
7. Additional Development Agreements May Be Necessary
The parties agree that other development agreements, in addition to and
following this Agreement, may be necessary to guide Redevelopment over time. That
is, should all or a portion of District 2 be surplused, the parties anticipate that this
Agreement would be supplemented by one or more additional development
agreements, addressing issues such as open space, and new internal public and private
road network and public facilities.
For example, the parties anticipate that construction of additional water,
sanitary and stormwater utility infrastructure, necessary for the Redevelopment of
District 2, beyond that associated with the Arterial Roads discussed in Section 4, and
which have been conceptually reviewed by Renton, as shown in Exhibits 6, 7 and 8,
will be covered by firture development agreements, and that the cost of such will
generally be the responsibility of Owner.
In addition, the parties anticipate that District 2 Redevelopment will include
public and private open space amenities. Such amenities may include one or more
contiguous parcels, that provide recreational amenities and public access to Lake
Washington, create view corridors to Lake Washington and Mount Rainier, and serve
as focal points for Redevelopment.
8. Marketing Information
Boeing will generally share with Renton marketing information for Renton
Plant Redevelopment efforts so that Renton will be informed about the marketing
VBOEING 11-24-03.doc]
11l24/03
Page 17
6. Vesting
6.1 Site -Wide Vesting to Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Use
Tables, and Site Plan Process for Term of Agreement
Upon signing of this Agreement, the Renton Plant Site is vested through the
term of this Agreement to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Uselables, and Site
Plan Process in place as of the date of this Agreement.
6.2 Additional Vesting to Development Regulations and Design
Guidelines at Time of Conceptual Plan Approval
6.2.1 Generally
Vesting to Development Regulations and Design Guidelines shall occur at the
time of Conceptual Plan approval pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement. Such
vesting shall extend for three years from the date of Conceptual Plan. approval for
Subdistricts IA and 1B, and extend for five years from the date of Conceptual Plan
Approval for District 2 ("Conceptual Plan Vesting Period"). Development
Regulations and Design Guidelines may be extended beyond the Conceptual Plan
Vesting Period if a materially complete application for master plan approval, pursuant
to RMC, for all or a portion of the Conceptual Plan area is submitted to Renton prior
to the end of the Conceptual Plan Vesting Period, in which case such vesting shall be
extended as to duration and area only for the master plan area according to the terns
of the master plan approval.
6.2.2 Vesting to Development Regulations and Design
Guidelines for Subdistrict lA Conceptual Plan
The Subdistrict I Conceptual Retail Plan approved pursuant to Section 3.2 of
this Agreement is hereby vested for three years as provided by Section 6.2.1.
6.2.3 Additional Time Necessary to Finalize Non -Retail
Development Regulations and Design Guidelines
The parties acknowledge that non -retail Development Regulations and Design
Guidelines will not be in final form as of the date of this Agreement. Renton shall
consult with Boeing as it finalizes such standards and guidelines and make best efforts
to submit such non -retail Development Regulations and Design Guidelines to City
Council for adoption, no later than April 1, 2004.
[BOEING 11-24-03.doc] I I/24/03
Page 16
5.2.3 Renton may issue such other or further debt or other obligations,
including any tax increment obligations, which Renton is now or hereafter legally
authorized to issue.
5.2.4 To the extent that any alternative financing may be structured in
a manner which will permit nationally recognized bond counsel to opine that the
interest on any obligation is excludable from gross income of the holder of any
obligation for federal income tax purposes, then Renton and Owner or Boeing
covenant and agree to cooperate in good faith to structure the alternative financing in
such manner.
5.3 Repayment
5.3.1 In the event that Owner or Boeing exercises its right of
alternative financing pursuant to Section 5.1, the parties shall cooperate in good faith
to enter into an agreement, pursuant to which the parties shall identify any and all
fees, user charges, revenues, taxes and other benefits which are expected to result
directly or indirectly, either from the public infrastructure so constructed or acquired
or from the transactions contemplated hereby, in order to determine the aggregate
benefits to Renton and any other funds that Renton may obtain from other
governmental authorities.
5.3.2 The parties agree that they shall, to the maximum extent not
prohibited by .law, directly or indirectly allocate two-thirds (2/3) of such taxes,
revenues and other benefits identified in 5.3.1, over time, to pay amounts due with
respect to alternative financing, or to reimburse Renton or related governmental
authority therefor. To the extent that such benefits are not permitted by law to be
directly allocated to pay debt service or similar obligations, the parties hereto agree
that such benefits shall nonetheless be taken into account directly or indirectly in
determining the total amounts of public resources which shall be allocated to repay
such costs, so that the net benefits.resulting from the transactions and public
infrastructure are allocated or deemed allocated for such purposes, in a fair and
equitable manner. It is further agreed that any costs of issuance of such public
financings, any capitalized interest thereon or any similar fees and expenses shall, to
the extent permitted by law, be included in the amount so financed and shall be
similarly repaid.
[/BOEING 11-24-03.doc)
11/l4/03
Page 15
4.9.2 Sewer main lines shall be installed consistent with the proposed
plan provided by Renton's Department of Public Works, described on Exhibit. 8,
attached.
4.10 Franchise Utilities
Provision for Franchise Utilities must be made, in conjunction with installation
of the Arterial Roads. Franchise Utilities and Owner shall bear the cost of any out-of-
pocket design costs, extra trenching, conduit, sleeves or other installations to provide
for Franchise Utilities. Owner and Renton agree to reuse existing assets, if both
parties agree that such reuse is feasible.
5. Alternative Financing
5.1 Triggering Events
Should Renton be unable to timely fund public infrastructure improvements or
should Owner or Boeing (if Owner is a non -Boeing entity) determine that it requires
construction of all or a portion of public infrastructure for Redevelopment on a
schedule more expedited than this Agreement provides, then, subject to the provisions
of Section 5.1 hereof the parties hereto agree that, Owner or Boeing may choose, at
its sole discretion, to provide alternative financing for all or a portion of public
infrastructure by one of the following means:
5.2 Potential Alternative Financing Methods
5.2.1 Owner or Boeing or some other party may build all or a portion
of the Arterial Roads and other infrastructure improvements described in Section 4 of
this Agreement and sell all or any portion of the public infrastructure to Renton or
other applicable governmental authority pursuant to a conditional sales contract, Iease
purchase or installment purchase arrangement or similar method, the effect of which
shall be _to cause the lease or purchase payment obligation to qualify as a promise to
pay within the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
5.2.2 Renton, or some other governmental authority, may issue
revenue bonds if and to the extent that the property to be financed is to be included in
a utility, system or similar enterprise with respect to which revenues are expected to
be available for the ultimate repayment of the capital cost of such property.
[BOEING 11-24-03.doc] 11/24/03
Page 14
all or a portion of Boeing's transportation obligations associated with Redevelopment,
except that such credit may not be applied to reduce Boeing's share of the On -Site
Intersection improvements addressed by Section 4.2.1.
4.7 Water
4.7.1 Renton shall, according to the principles set forth in Section
4.1.5, install water lines to support redevelopment in coordination with the
construction of Arterial Roads.
4.7.2 Water lines installed shall be consistent with the "Option 1" plan
provided by Renton's Department of Planning, Building and Public Works, described
on Exhibits 6A and 6B, attached.
. 4.7.3 Owner and Renton will work together to create a water plan to
ensure provision of adequate routine (non -emergency) water and emergency water,
including fire flow protection, to the Renton Plant Site, for continued Renton Plant
Operations and for Redevelopment, including but not limited to an agreement that
water for Renton Plant Operations will be of adequate pressure, quantity, quality and
have required system redundancy.
4.8 Stormwater Conveyance
Renton shall, according to the principles set forth in Section 4.1.5, install a
stormwater drainage and collection system to support Redevelopment, in coordination
with the construction of Arterial Roads. The system to be installed is referred to as
Option 1 B in Exhibit 7, which anticipates reuse of a portion of the Boeing stormwater
drainage and collection system. The segment lengths, type of improvement, needed
right of way, length of laterals and estimated costs of these segments is set forth in
Exhibit 7A. If all or a portion of Boeing's stormwater drainage and collection system
is used, Boeing agrees to grant Renton an easement for maintenance, repair and
replacement of that system and title to the stormwater drainage and collection system
being used by Renton.
4.9 Sanitary Sewer
4.9.1 Renton shall, according to the principles set forth in Section
4.1.5, install sewer main lines to support redevelopment, in coordination with the
construction of Arterial Roads.
[HOEING 11-24-03_docl 11/24/03
Page 13
4.2.2 Off -Site Intersections
The cost of Off -Site Intersections will be paid jointly by the parties in shares
proportionate to the amount of predicted traffic using the development and the amount
of predicted traffic that is general pass -through traffic. These traffic predictions will
be made by use of a mutually acceptable traffic forecasting model. Owner's
contribution will be proportionate to the percentage of the traffic trips using the
development, and Renton's contribution will be proportionate to the percentage of the
traffic trips that are general purpose pass. through trips.
4.2.3 Boeing Trip Allocation
Boeing agrees that it will allocate up to 1,500 of the "baseline trips"
established by the 2002 Agreement for Redevelopment of District 1. It is understood
that this Agreement is based upon reallocation of up to 1,500 trips in order to mitigate
.or minimize the need for additional transportation improvements. The method, timing
and distribution of each trip shall be at Boeing's sole discretion. If, however, Boeing's
reservation of all or a portion of the 1,500 trips results in the need for transportation
improvements that would have been otherwise unnecessary, Boeing will bear the cost
of those improvements.
4.3 Interchanges
The parties agree to collaborate on lobbying and other efforts to receive state
and federal funding of I-405 interchange improvements that benefit Redevelopment.
4.4 Local Roads
Owner agrees to pay for all Local Roads required for Redevelopment.
4.5 Transportation Mitigation Fees
Renton agrees that Renton transportation mitigation fees assessed as mitigation
for Redevelopment will be used to fund off -site improvements, required to support
Redevelopment, in proportionate share of the cost of such improvements.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, transportation impact fees shall not be devoted to On -
Site Improvements or for site access improvements required by Redevelopment, such
as left turn lanes on periphery streets.
4.6 Strander Agreement Transportation Mitigation Fee Credits
The parties acknowledge that, at Boeing's sole discretion, all or a portion of
the reserve account established by the Strander Agreement may be utilized to pay for
[BOEING 11-24-03.doc]
11/l4/03
Page 12
4.1.7 Design Fund and Timing
4.1.7.1 Renton agrees, within 30 days of the date of this
Agreement, to earmark $1.5 million for funding of Arterial Road design and
engineering ("Arterial Road Design Fund" or `Tund" ). The Fund will be utilized, as
needed, to ensure that design and engineering of the Arterial Roads occur in
collaboration with Owner and sufficiently in advance of Redevelopment project
construction to produce needed Arterial Roads in time to serve such Redevelopment.
The parties agree that Renton shall begin the consultant selection process for design.
of Arterial Roads within 30 days of the date of this Agreement.
4.1.7.2 With respect to Subdistrict I Arterial Roads, Renton will
begin design, through its consultant, of the intersection of Park and Logan as the first
task of the consultant selected pursuant to Section 4.1.7.1. This early design shall be
completed as soon as reasonably possible for the purpose of defining the location and
extent of the needed right of way of the intersection of park Avenue and Logan
Avenue. Owner and Renton will consult on a right of way definition sufficient to
permit Owner to establish its property lines for purposes of sale.
4.1.8 General Construction Timing
Construction of all or portions of Arterial Roads required for each increment of
Redevelopment will occur based upon (a) need for that portion of the Arterial Road as
demonstrated by a SEPA environmental checklist prepared for that increment of
Redevelopment, a traffic study, or other documentation agreed to by the parties, and
(b) a construction schedule established by Renton and approved by Owner.to ensure
final completion of such Arterial Roads, for each increment of Redevelopment, prior
to issuance of the first occupancy permit for that increment; provided, that if such
Arterial Road construction is not timely completed, Renton shall identify and
construct, at its cost, mutually acceptable interim access.
4.2 Intersections
4.2.E On -Site Intersections
The cost of On -Site Intersections will be paid by Renton according to the
principles set forth in Section 4.1.5, except that Owner will pay (a) the cost of left turn
lanes necessary to provide access to Redevelopment and (b) that portion of the cost of
the traffic signal necessary to support left turn movements.
[BOEING 11-24-03.doc] 1124/03
Page 11
4.1.5.5 In the event of an infrastructure delay, Renton will
immediately notify Owner and (if Owner is a non -Boeing entity) Boeing of its need to
delay and representatives of the parties will meet to discuss a cure, which may include
(at Owner's or Boeing's option) the provision of alternative financing pursuant to
Section 5 of this Agreement.
4.1.6 Arterial Rights of Way
4.1.6.1 Owner agrees to dedicate, at no cost to Renton, the land
necessary for the rights of way described in Exhibit 2, at the time that land on which
the rights of ways are located is sold; provided, that (a) Renton may request earlier
dedication, which Owner may approve in its sole discretion, which approval shall not
be unreasonably withheld, and (b) easements or license agreements will be provided
by Renton to Boeing, as Boeing deems necessary, to allow continued operation of
facilities within the right of way that support Renton Plant Operations. That is, the
parties intend that, if approved, such early dedication would not result in additional
cost to or dislocation of Renton Plant Operations.
4.1.6.2 Should there be Owner buildings located in the rights of
way, it shall be the responsibility of Owner to, at such time as the road needs to be
constructed, and upon Renton's request, (a) demolish such buildings and (b) cap and
abandon any underground facilities that would interfere with Renton's use of the
dedicated property for right of way purposes.
4.1.6.3 Park Avenue is constructed asymmetrically within the
current right of way. Expansion of Park Avenue anticipates use of the existing road.
Some additional. realignment may be necessary to connect Park Avenue to Logan.
Owner will dedicate the necessary right of way to realign Park Avenue to provide
symmetrical right of way and as anticipated for expansion under Exhibit 2. Renton
will vacate any excess right of way created by such realignment, at no expense to
Owner. Should Owner have a building occupying property that would need to be
dedicated to Renton for right of way, then Owner shall grant the right of way, except
for the portion occupied by the building. In such case Owner will reserve the right of
way for Renton, and provide the dedication at no cost to Renton when the building is
demolished.
4.1.6.4 Renton shall not vacate any right of way dedicated by
Boeing necessary to serve Redevelopment, until redevelopment is complete or upon
the approval of Boeing and Owner.
POEING 11-24-03.doc] 11/24/03
Page 10
4.1.3 Subdistrict 1B Arterial Roads
The parties agree that the Arterial Roads or portions thereof diagrammed on
Exhibit 10, with typical sections of the individual Arterial Roads shown in Exhibits
l0A through 10E (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit 10) as District 1,
Subdistrict 1B and listed by segment on Exhibit 9 are anticipated to be necessary for
full Subdistrict 1B Redevelopment.
4.1.4 Other Arterials
The cost of required improvements to arterial roads not addressed by this
Agreement will be paid by property owners or developers benefited by the
improvement based on a fair share allocation of total cost.
4.1.5 Arterial Road and Other Public Infrastructure
Funding
4.1.5.1 Renton agrees to design and construct the Arterial Roads
and certain other elements of public infrastructure specified below at Renton's sole
'cost and expense; provided, that Renton will rely on revenues from sales tax on
construction, increased sales tax from Redevelopment improvements and the property
tax and other revenues generated by Redevelopment to fund its share of the public
infrastructure anticipated under this Agreement.
4.1.5.2 Renton will retain one-third (1/3) of the collected tax and
other revenues generated by Redevelopment, and will set aside. the remaining two-
thirds (213) for infrastructure improvements anticipated in this Agreement as
necessary to timely support Redevelopment within the Subdistricts.
4.1.5.3 Renton intends to utilize limited tax general obligation
debt to fund Arterial Roads and other public infrastructure under this Agreement, to
be paid for by revenues generated by Redevelopment pursuant to the terms of
Section 4.1.5.1. For example, $12,000,000 in bonds would require approximately
$1,000,000 per year in debt service for a 20 year bond at 5% interest. Similarly,
$7,500,000 in bonds would require approximately $625,000 per year in debt service
and $4,000,000 in bonds would require approximately $333,000 in debt service.
4.1.5.4 Should tax revenues fall short of those necessary to timely
install all infrastructure improvements required for a particular Redevelopment
project, Renton may delay infrastructure construction until the tax revenue shortfall is
remedied.
[BOEING Dev Agreement 11-24.03.doe] 11/24/03
Page 9
approximately 110,000 sq. ft. of small retail shops, as well as potential locations for
structured parking and upper story multi -family residential units or office uses.
3.5.2 An Economic Benefit Analysis for Subdistrict 1 A of the
Redevelopment, attached as part of Exhibit 5, demonstrates that the Subdistrict 1A
Retail Conceptual Plan, which is forecast to produce estimated revenues to Renton of
approximately $1.2 million in one-time, construction related revenues and an
escalation to approximately $1.5 million in recurring annual revenues to support
Subdistrict I Retail Redevelopment beginning in 2009, demonstrates revenues
sufficient to fund Renton's obligation to construct public infrastructure supporting
Subdistrict 1A Retail Redevelopment subject to Section 4, below.
3.6 Additional Planning Applicable
Owner acknowledges that additional site planning based on the requirements of
the RMC will be required for potential Redevelopment within the Subdistricts. For
example, should Subdistrict 1 A be further divided by short plat, lot boundary
adjustment or otherwise, master planning and site planning for each parcel and
building site pursuant to RMC 4-9-200 would be required.
4. Infrastructure Required to Support Redevelopment
Transportation and trunk utilities anticipated to be necessary to support
Redevelopment and the manner in which each will be funded and developed are
discussed below. Exhibit 2 generally illustrates each segment of Arterial Roads.
Exhibits 6A, 6B, 7, 7A, 7E and 8 illustrate supporting trunk utilities. Exhibit 9
describes infrastructure components and corresponding anticipated cost.
4.1 Transportation Improvements
4.1.1 Arterial Roads Required at Full Build Out
The parties agree that the Arterial Roads diagrammed on Exhibit 2 and listed
on Exhibit 9, will be necessary to support full redevelopment of the Renton Plant Site,
including District 2, assuming an intensity of total site Redevelopment no greater than
Alternative 4 studied in the EIS.
4.1.2 Subdistrict 1A Arterial Roads
The parties agree that the Arterial Roads or portions thereof diagrammed on
Exhibit 10 as District 1, Subdistrict 1A roads and listed by segment on Exhibit 9 are
anticipated to be necessary for full Subdistrict I Redevelopment.
[/BOEING 11-24-03.&e] 11/24/03
Page 8
3.1.5 Vehicular and pedestrian circulation that includes a hierarchy and
general location of type, including arterials, pedestrian -oriented streets, other local
roads and pedestrian pathways;
3.1.6 General location and size of public open space; and
3.1.7 An economic benefit analysis demonstrating the conceptual
development's anticipated economic impact to local, regional and state governments.
3.2 Conceptual Plan Approval
Owner will submit the Conceptual Plan to the City Council for approval. The
Council will base its approval on the proposed Conceptual Plan's fulfillment of the
adopted Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center —North.
3.3 Subsequent Land Use Approvals
Renton will evaluate all subsequent development permit applications within
the Subdistricts based on consistency with the approved Conceptual Plan. The process
for subsequent master plan and site plan approval is outlined in RMC 4-9-200.
3.4 Modifications to Approved Conceptual Plans
3.4.1 Modifications to an approved Conceptual Plan may be made after
an administrative determination of the significance of the proposed modification.
3.4.2 Minor modifications to an approved Conceptual Plan may be
approved administratively as long as the proposed modifications remain consistent
with the spirit and intent of the, adopted Plan.
3.4.3 If it is determined that a proposed modification is inconsistent
with the spirit and intent of the adopted Conceptual Plan, or if an entirely new .
Conceptual Plan is proposed, City Council approval is required.
3.5 Subdistrict 1A Conceptual Retail Plan
Owner has produced a Subdistrict 1 A Conceptual Retail Plan, attached as
Exhibit 5, that meets the requirements of Section 3, outlining proposed
Redevelopment of Subdistrict IA. By adoption of this Agreement, the City Council
approves this plan as the Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict IA.
3.5.1 The Subdistrict 1 A Retail Conceptual Plan includes development _
of approximately 450,000 sq. ft. of large- and medium -format retail stores and
[/BOUNG Dev Agreement 11-24-03.doe] 11/24/03
Page 7
M
limited .to Renton commitments for corresponding potential funding and construction
of certain public infrastructure improvements.benefiting the Renton Plant Site and the
community at large and Owner commitments to participate in the funding of certain
public improvements, to fund all private aspects of Redevelopment, and to redevelop
the Renton Plant Site consistent with applicable Land Use Policies and Regulations.
2.2 SEPA Decision Document
This Agreement is entered into in lieu of a SEPA `Decision Document" and, as
such, establishes all SEPA-based conditions necessary to mitigate potential adverse
impacts of the Proposal, and Renton's approval of the Subdistrict I Conceptual
Retail Plan.
3. Redevelopment Planning
Redevelopment of the Renton Plant Site may occur incrementally starting with
properties within Subdistrict IA. Conceptual planning for the possible surplus and
sale of property will occur in three areas of the Renton Plant Site, Subdistrict 1 A,
Subdistrict 1B, and District 2, as illustrated in Exhibit 3. Conceptual planning,
pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, will be supplemented by master
planning and site planning pursuant to the requirements of RMC 4-9-200.
3.1 Conceptual Plan
At the time at which Owner wishes to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise
alter any property within the Subdistricts for uses not related to airplane
manufacturing or supporting uses, it will submit to Renton a Conceptual Plan
including:
3.1.1. A narrative describing the conceptual Redevelopment proposal
and its relationship to the Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the
Urban Center —North;
3.1.2 The estimated timing and sequencing of property surplus and sale
(if applicable);
3.1.3 A description of the proposed uses including the general mix of
types, estimated square footage of each building and parking for each structure,
heights and residential densities;
3.1.4 The general location of use concentrations (i.e., residential
neighborhoods, office or retail cores, etc.);
[/BOEING 11-24-03.doe] 11/24/03
Page 6
1.14 On -Site Intersections means the intersections shown on Exhibit 4.
1.15 Owner means Boeing and any transferee or successor -in -interest of all
or any portion of the Renton Plant.
1.16 Proposal means, collectively, Owner's Comprehensive Plan Application
and related zoning and Development Regulation amendments proposed by Renton.
1.17 RMC means the Renton Municipal Code.
1. IS Redevelopment means construction of improvements to the Renton
Plant for uses other than airplane manufacturing or uses supporting or associated with
airplane manufacturing.
1.19 Renton Plant. Operations means airplane manufacturing and supporting
or associated uses conducted on the Renton Plant Site.
1.20 Renton Plant Site means District 1 and District 2, collectively, as shown
on Exhibit 3.
1.21 Site Plan Process means the master planning and site plan requirements
of the RMC applicable to Redevelopment within the UC-N zone.
1.22 Subdistrict IA means that portion of District 1 commonly known as
Paging Lot 3 and. the 10-50 Building as shown on the Subdistrict 1 A Conceptual
Plan.
1.23 Subdistrict I means that portion of District 1 commonly known as the
10-80 site, Lot 10, and other Boeing -owned parcels east of Logan Avenue and south
of a Street.
1.24 Subdistriats means Subdistrict 1A, Subdistrict 1B, and District 2,
collectively.
1.25 Utilities means water, sewer and stormwater system improvements that
serve the Renton Plant Site.
2. Basis of Agreement
2.1 Intent
This Agreement establishes certain roles and responsibilities for the potential
phased Redevelopment of all or a portion of the Renton Plant Site, including but not
[/BOOING 11-24-03.docj 11/24/03
Page 5
I
attached, with typical sections of the individual Arterial Roads shown in Exhibits 2A
through 2E (herinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit 2).
1.2 Boeing means The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, and
related or subsidiary entities.
1.3 Design Guidelines means the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations
established by Renton to supplement the Development Regulations with respect to the
design of certain uses permitted within the UC-N zone.
1.4 Development Regulations means those portions of the Renton
Municipal Code (RMC) zoning provisions that govern certain aspects of site planning,
building design, landscape requirements and other elements of development within a
given zone.
1.5 District 1 means that area of the Renton Plant Site located east of Logan
Avenue, as designated on Exhibit 3 attached.
1.6 . District 2 means that area of the Renton Plant Site located west of
Logan Avenue, as designated on Exhibit 3.
1.7 Economic Benefit Analysis means the calculation of estimated one time
and recurring revenues and jobs generated by a proposed Redevelopment project.
1.8 Franchise Utilities means electricity, natural gas, telecommunications,
and other utilities not provided by Renton.
1.9 Interchanges mean access points from Renton roadways to and from
Interstate 405.
1.10 Intersections mean the general areas where two or more roadways join
or cross, including the roadways and roadside facilities for traffic movement within
them.
1.11 band Use Policies and Regulations means Renton Comprehensive Plan
policies, Development Regulations and Design Guidelines.
1.12 Local Roads means all on -site roads that are not Arterial Roads and that
are necessitated by Redevelopment.
1.13 Off -Site Intersections means intersections not included within District 1
or District 2.
[/BOEING 11-24-03.doc] 11/24/03
Page 4
heavy industrial (IH), but also agreed to support Boeing's "Move -to -the -Lake"
including any required building modification or construction.
J. On June 9, 2003, the City Council amended the Moratorium for a
second time by the adoption of Resolution 3639. Resolution 3639 lifted the
Moratorium over I-H zoned areas located within the Employment Area -Valley
Comprehensive Plan designation. The Renton Plant is the only I-H zoned property of
any significant size that continues to be bound by the Moratorium, which is scheduled
to expire on December 2, 2003.
. K.. On March 4, 2003, Renton's Environmental Review Committee
("ERC') adopted a determination of significance for the Proposal. Renton issued a
Scoping Notice and Scoping Document for the EIS on March 10, 2003. On March
25, 2003, a public scoping meeting was held to receive written and oral comments on
the proposed scope of study. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was
issued by the ERC.on July 9, 2003. A public hearing was held on July 30; 2003. A
thirty day comment period on the DEIS was closed on August 8, 2003. The Final EIS
was issued on October 21, 2003.
L. Portions of the Proposal were the subject of a Renton Planning
Commission hearing held November 12, 2003; the Proposal and related modifications
to Renton's existing parking code, site development plan review ordinance, and
binding site plan ordinance were the subject of the City Council Hearing held on
November 17, 2003. The City Council adopted all by ordinance on November 24,
2003.
M. Owner has determined that the portions of the Renton Plant Site known
as Lot 3 and the 10-50 site will become under-utilized at the completion of Move -to -
the -Lake. Consequently, those portions of the Plant may be surplused and made
available for sale, in the near future.
IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, and because successful redevelopment of
all or portions of the Renton Plant site will be of long-term benefit to both Renton and
Owner, Renton and Owner do hereby agree as follows:
M. AGREEMENT
1. Definitions
1.1 Arterial Roads means the primary public roads supporting District 1 and
2 Redevelopment, as diagrammed in plan and section and described on Exhibit 2
[BOEING 11-24-03.doel 11/24/03
Page 3
No. 3568 which, among other things, established baseline trip counts,
redevelopment credit and vesting of land use regulations under certain circumstances
for ongoing Renton Plant operations and potential redevelopment.
E. Based on further discussions between Owner and Renton regarding
potential opportunities for redevelopment of the Renton Plant site, in phases, over
time, Renton resolved, by Resolution 3589, on October 14, 2002, to conduct
environmental review in the form of an environmental impact statement ("EIS")
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPX) of (a) potential alternatives
for redevelopment of all or a portion of the Renton Plant site and (b) related public
infrastructure. Resolution 3589 also established a conceptual public/private
framework for the eventual mitigation of the impacts of Renton Plant redevelopment
on transportation infrastructure and public services.
F. On December 4, 2002, Owner and Renton entered into an agreement
concerning the funding and construction of the extension of Strander Blvd. across
Owner's Longacres property ("Strander Agreement"). Among other things, the
Strander Agreement establishes a $1.7 million transportation mitigation credit to
Boeing that may be used to pay for transportation improvements needed to support
development of Owner's properties located in Renton.
G. On December 16, 2002, Owner submitted an application to Renton for
amendment of the Comprehensive Plan designation applicable to the Renton Plant site
("Comprehensive Plan Application') from 1H to Employment Area — Transition
("EAT"). Renton elected to designate the area under a new Comprehensive Plan
designation and combine the Comprehensive Plan Application with amendments
proposed by Renton to the zoning text, zoning map and development standard for the
Renton Plant site
H. On December 20, 2002, Renton imposed, by Resolution 3609, a
Moratorium on -development in areas of Renton, including the Renton Plant, zoned
1H. One stated reason for the Moratorium was Renton's desire to `provide adequate
time for Renton staff to prepare and present proposed changes to the Comprehensive
Plan and zoning" of those areas zoned heavy industrial (IM.
I. On January 13, 2003, the City Council held a public hearing on the
Moratorium. At the request of the Boeing Company, Renton amended the
Moratorium to allow Boeing to consolidate its facilities within the Renton Plant.
After the January 13, 2002 public hearing, the Renton City Council adopted
Resolution 3613 which continued the Moratorium in those areas of Renton zoned
POEING 11-24-03.doc] 11/24/03
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE BOEING COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RENTON
FOR. REDEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF THE BOEING RENTON
AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING FACILITY
I. PREAMBLE
This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement') between THE
BOEING COMPANY ("Owner" or `Boeing'), a Delaware corporation, and the CITY
OF RENTON C Renton' ), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, is .
entered into pursuant to the authority of RCW 36.70B.170 through .210, under which
a local government may enter into a development agreement with an entity having
ownership or control of real property within its jurisdiction.
H. RECITALS
A. Owner owns approximately 280 acres of real property, known as the
Boeing Renton Aircraft Manufacturing Facility ("Renton Plant" or `Plant"), located
in Renton, King County, Washington, as more particularly described in Exhibit 1,
attached Since the early 1940s, the Plant has been used to manufacture military and
commercial airplanes.
B. The majority of the Renton Plant site has historically been zoned for
heavy industrial use and has, for several years, been designated Employment Area -
industrial by the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Since 2000, a parcel along the Plant's
eastern boundary has been zoned IH and designated by the Comprehensive Plan as
Employment Area -Transition (Interim) and a nearby parcel has been zoned CO and
designated by the Comprehensive Plan as Employment Area -Office.
C. In 2002, Owner informed Renton of its plan to consolidate its Renton
Plant operations to the site area west of Logan Avenue, an effort commonly known as
the "Move -to -the -Lake." Move -to -the -Lake is, among other things, intended to
release underutilized land as surplus for eventual sale and redevelopment.
D. To provide certainty and efficiency to Owner with respect to further
development of the Renton Plant for airplane manufacturing purposes, to encourage
continued airplane manufacturing by Owner at the Renton Plant, and in anticipation
of potential future redevelopment efforts, Owner and Renton entered into a
Development Agreement ("2002 Agreement") on June 28, 2002, by Resolution
[BOEING Dev Agreement 11-24-03.doc) 11/24/03
Page i
EXHIBIT "A"
Return Address
Office of the City Clerk
Renton City Hall
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Document Titles) (or transactions contained therein):
1. Development Agreement for Renton Plant Redevelopment
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:
(on page _ of documents(s))
Grantor(s) (Last name fast, then first name and initials):
1. The Boeing Company
Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials).
1. City of Renton
Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range)
Portions of Renton Farm Plat, Renton Farm Plat No. 2, Plat of Sartorisville, Renton Boiler Works Short Plat,
Renton Farm Acreage Plat, City of Renton Short Plat, C.H. Adsit's Lake Washington Plat, and Government
Lots 1, 2, and 3 — SIR 082305 TAXLOT 55 PCL 1 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 115 PCL 2 BOEING;
STR 082305 TAXLOT 880 PCL 3 BOEING, SIR 082305 TAXLOT 19 PCL 4 BOEING, STR 082305
TAXLOT 9 PCL 5 BOEING, SIR 082305 TAXLOT 37 PCL 6 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 105 PCL
7 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 152 PCL 8 BOEING, SIR 072305 TAXLOT 1 PCL 9 BOEING, SIR
072365 TAXLOT 46 PCL 10 BOEING, SIR 082305 TAXLOT 11 PCL 11 BOEING, STR 082305
TAXLOT 187 PCL 12 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 79 PCL 13 BOEING,
STR M305 TAXLOT 100 PCL 14 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 204 PCL 15 BOEING.
Full legal is on pages through of document.
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number
Portions, of the following: #756460-0055-04, #722300-0115-08, #722400-0880-00, #082305-9019-00,
#082305-9209-00, #082305-9037-08, #722300-0105-00, #082305-9152-07, #072305-9001-01, #072305-
%46s 08, #082305-9011-08, #082305-9187-K #082305-9019-07, #072305-9100-01, #082305-9204-05.
t/BOEING Dev Agreement 11.24-03.doc)
11/24/03
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2004.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1142:11/3/04:ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
VA
ORDINANCE NO.
5. Public notice for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to
the underlying permit. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall
state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the
underlying permit, no special notice is required.
6. If a project is determined not to be a Planned Action, the Director shall
notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City SEPA
procedures and state laws. The notice to the applicant shall describe the elements of the
application that result in disqualification as a Planned Action.
7. Projects disqualified as a Planned Action may use or incorporate relevant
elements of the environmental review analysis in the EIS prepared for the Planned Action, as
well as other environmental documents to assist in meeting SEPA requirements. The
Environmental Review Committee may choose to limit the scope of the SEPA review to those
issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the EIS.
SECTION IV. Time Period. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed
no later than December 31, 2009 by the Development Services Director to determine its
continuing validity with respect to the environmental conditions of the subject site and vicinity
and applicability of Planned Action requirements. Based upon this review, this Ordinance may
be amended as needed, and another review period may be specified.
SECTION V. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between the Ordinance or any
mitigation measures imposed pursuant thereto and any ordinance, or regulation of the City, the
provisions of this Ordinance shall control, EXCEPT that provision of any Uniform Code shall
supersede.
SECTION VI. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared unconstitutional or invalid for
any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance
or its application to any other person or situation.
SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2004.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
R
ORDINANCE NO.
f) The proposed project complies with all applicable local, state and
federal regulations, and where appropriate, needed variances or modifications or other special
permits have been requested; and
g) The proposed project is not an essential public facility.
F. Effect of Planned Action.
1. Upon designation by the Director that the project qualifies as a Planned
Action, the project shall not be subject to a SEPA threshold determination, an environmental
impact statement (EIS), or any additional review under SEPA.
2. Being designated a Planned Action means that a proposed project has been
reviewed in accordance with this Ordinance, and found to be consistent with the development
parameters and environmental analysis included in the EIS.
3. Planned Actions will not be subject to further procedural review under
SEPA. However, projects will be subject to conditions designed to mitigate any environmental
impacts which may result from the project proposal, and projects will be subject to whatever
permit requirements are deemed appropriate by the City under State and City laws and
ordinances. The Planned Action designation shall not excuse a project from meeting the City's
code and ordinance requirements apart from the SEPA process.
G. Planned Action Permit Process. The Director shall establish a procedure to
review projects and to determine whether they meet the criteria as Planned Actions under State
laws and City codes and ordinances. The procedure shall consist, at a minimum, of the
following:
1. Development applications shall meet the requirements of RMC Chapters
4-8 and 4-9. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the Department and shall include
a SEPA checklist or revised SEPA checklist [where approved through WAC 197-11-315(2)] or
such other environmental review forms provided by the Planning/Building/Public Work
Department. The checklist may be incorporated into the form of an application;
2. The Director shall determine whether the application is complete as
provided in RMC Chapter 4-8.
3. If the project application is within an area designated as a Planned Action,
the application shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed application is consistent
with and meets all of the qualifications specified in section III of this Ordinance.
4. Upon review of a complete application by the City, the Director shall
determine whether the project qualifies as a Planned Action. If the project does qualify, the
Director shall notify the applicant, and the project shall proceed in accordance with the
appropriate permit procedure, except that no additional SEPA review, threshold determination,
or EIS shall be required.
5
ORDINANCE NO.
5. Air Quality: A significant change in configuration, increase in building
heights, or significant decrease in setbacks between residential and manufacturing uses, which
could affect localized air quality and odor conditions would require additional SEPA review.
6. Water. The following changes by the Planned Action scenarios to the
Alternatives analyzed in the EIS would require additional SEPA review:
a) Change in peak flows to Johns Creek significantly exceeding the
levels reviewed in the EIS.
b) Increase in number of outfalls to Johns Creek or Lake Washington
beyond the numbers reviewed in the EIS.
5. Public Services and Utilities: A significant increase in the number of
square feet or dwelling units beyond the maximum number analyzed in the EIS would require
additional SEPA review to address impacts to Fire, Police, Schools, Parks, Water, Wastewater,
Solid Waste, as applicable.
E. Planned Action Review Criteria.
1. The Director of Development Services, or the Director's designee, is
hereby authorized to designate a project application as a Planned Action pursuant to RCW
43.21C.031(2)(a), if the project application meets WAC 197-11-172 and all of the following
conditions:
a) The project is located on the subject site as described in section
III.A, or is an off -site improvement directly related to a proposed development on the subject
site; and
b) The project is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan
adopted under RCW 36.70A; and
c) The project's significant environmental impacts have been
adequately addressed in the EIS by reviewing the environmental checklist or other project review
form as specified in WAC 190-11-315; and
d) The project complies with the Planned Action thresholds in the
EIS; and
e) The Director has determined that the project's significant impacts
have been mitigated through the application of the Development Agreement in Exhibit A, as well
as other City requirements, standard mitigation fees and conditions, which together constitute
sufficient mitigation for the significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project; and
11
ORDINANCE NO.
Development Agreement, together with existing City codes, ordinances, standard mitigation fees,
and standards shall provide the framework for the decision by the City to impose conditions on a
Planned Action project. Other environmental documents incorporated by reference in the EIS
may also be utilized to assist in analyzing impacts and determining appropriate mitigation
measures.
C. Planned Action Designated. Uses and activities described in the EIS, subject to
the thresholds described in Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 analyzed in the EIS, and subject to the
mitigation measures described in Exhibit A, are designated Planned Actions pursuant to RCW
43.21.C.031.
D. Planned Action Thresholds.
1. Land Use. Subject to the measures described in Exhibit A, the land uses
and development levels analyzed as Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the EIS, together with their
customary accessory uses and amenities described in the EIS, when applied to the Conceptual
Plan for Lakeshore Landing approved by the City Council at its meeting of October 18, 2004,
makes Lakeshore Landing a Planned Action pursuant to RCW 43.21.C.031.
If future refinements to the approved Lakeshore Landing Conceptual Plan exceed the
maximum development parameters reviewed, supplemental environmental review may be
required under SEPA Rules. If proposed plans significantly change the location of uses in a
manner which would negatively affect land use compatibility (for example, move commercial
and office uses in such a manner that they would not buffer residential uses from the nearby
manufacturing uses), additional SEPA review would be required.
2. Building Heights and Thresholds: Building heights shall not exceed the
maximum heights allowed in the UC-N1 zone. In comparison with the building heights
reviewed in the EIS, a proposed increase in height greater than 10% shall require additional
SEPA review addressing aesthetics and shadows.
3. Transportation:
a) Trip Ranges: The range of trips were reviewed in the EIS.
b) Trip Threshold: Uses or activities which would exceed the
maximum trip levels shown in the EIS must complete additional SEPA review.
c) Road Improvements: The Planned Action would require on -site
and off -site road improvements. These road improvements have been analyzed in the EIS.
Significant changes to the road improvement plan that have the potential to significantly increase
impacts to air quality, water quality, fisheries resources, or noise levels beyond the levels
analyzed in the EIS would require additional SEPA review.
4. Earth: A significant change in amount of grading assumed in the EIS
which has the potential to adversely affect water quality or fisheries shall require additional
SEPA review.
3
ORDINANCE NO.
a
C. Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process for this site by relying
on completed and existing detailed environmental analysis for the subject site; and
D. Combine environmental analysis with land use planning.
It is the express purpose of this ordinance that all the City's development codes be
applied together with the development agreement framework attached as Exhibit A to this
Ordinance for the purpose of processing Planned Actions.
SECTION II. Findings. The City Council finds that:
A. The Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
addresses all significant environmental impacts associated with the scenarios described in the
EIS for Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 as referenced therein, and the Lakeshore Landing Conceptual
Plan is encompassed by those Alternatives; and
B. The mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, Exhibit A
of this Ordinance, together with the City's development standards, final EIS and standard
mitigation fees (Parks, Fire and Traffic), are adequate to mitigate the significant adverse
environmental impacts of the proposed Lakeshore Landing conceptual site plan; and
C. The expedited permit review procedure set forth in this Ordinance is and will be a
benefit to the public, protects the environment, and enhances economic development; and
D. Opportunities for public involvement and review have been provided as part of
the Comprehensive Plan, rezoning and EIS processes, and the approval of the Conceptual Plan
for Lakeshore Landing and comments have been considered which have resulted in
modifications to measures in the Development Agreement and analyzed Alternatives.
SECTION III. Procedure and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining
Projects as Planned Actions. z
A. Planned Action Site. The Planned Action designation shall apply to
approximately 55 acres of property commonly referred to as the Lakeshore Landing site, and
referred to in this Ordinance as the "subject site." The City Council has approved, at its regular
meeting on October 18, 2004, the Lakeshore Landing Conceptual Plan for development of
between 500,000 square feet and 800,000 square feet. The property and Conceptual Plan are
illustrated in Exhibit B, and legally described in Exhibit C. Additionally, the Planned Action
designation shall apply to any off -site improvements necessitated by the proposed development
on the subject site, where the off -site improvements have been analyzed in the EIS.
B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action designation for a site -specific
permit application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Renton Boeing
Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) issued by the City on October 21,
2003. The Development Agreement, Exhibit A, is based upon the analysis in the EIS. The
2
It
�i- isaa�y
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 1707
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
DESIGNATING A PLANNED ACTION FOR THE LAKESHORE
LANDING DEVELOPMENT, APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES LOCATED
BETWEEN LOGAN AVENUE N. TO THE WEST AND GARDEN
AVENUE N. TO THE EAST, N. STH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND
EAST OF THE BOEING MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS ON THE
WEST.
WHEREAS, RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, - 168, and - 172 allow and
govern the application of a Planned Action designation; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared for the
Lakeshore Landing site, entitled the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS, and
such document considers the potential environmental impacts of a phased mixed -use project on
property generally owned by the Boeing Company in North Renton, including approximately 55
acres of subject property, proposed to be developed as Lakeshore Landing; and
WHEREAS, with Ordinance No. 5026, the City has amended the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map for the subject area from Employment Area — Industrial (EA -I), Employment
Area — Transition (EA-T) and Employment Area Office (EA-0) to Urban Center North (UC-N);
and
WHEREAS, with Ordinance No. 5027 the City has amended the Zoning Map from
Center Office Residential (COR) and Commercial Office (CO), to Urban Center North 1 (UC-
Nl); and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance would designate certain land uses and activities as "Planned
Actions" which would be consistent with the Urban Center North 1 (UC-NI) designation and
zone;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Purpose. The City of Renton declares that the purpose of this
ordinance is to:
A. Set forth a procedure designating certain project actions within the subject site as
"Planned Actions" consistent with state law, RCW 43.21C.031; and
B. Provide the public with an understanding as to what constitutes a Planned Action
and how land use applications which qualify as Planned Actions will be processed by the City;
and
1
ArlMFl!0VF--D BY
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE t4� -0' NCIL
COMMITTEE REPORT
1� Date �l-/S-aaGy
November 2004
Main Ave. S. Speed Limit Increase
(Referred January 28, 2002)
PUBLIC SAFETY
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 15, 2004
Interagency Ja11'Bookiugs ari:d Fees
.(Referred 1 b/ 11�/04j �'
®P^ '?
G n� C i L
®ate &0 y
The Public Safety Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to
accept jail bookings from other municipalities on a space -available basis, provided that
staff develops language acceptable to the Council regarding liability coverage prior to
entering into contracts. It is also understood that a booking fee of $64.83 will be
collected from all individuals, either personally at the time of booking into the Renton
Jail, or paid directly by contracting cities.
The Committee also recommends preparation of the ordinance and resolution
implementing the contracts and fees.
C: Garry Anderson, Chief of Police
Penny Bartley, Jail Manager
i�- is-aoot�
COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 15, 2004
1VIuseum Master Plan; Consultant Hire
(Referred July 22, 20:02)
The Community Services Committee met to discuss this issue on August 5, 2002. At this
time, there doesn't appear to be any support for this issue. The Committee recommends,
therefore, that this referral be closed.
C:. Dennis Culp
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PffMENT
City of IPenton
TO OWNER:
PROJECT:
APPLICATION NO.: 1 Distribution to
City of Renton
Maplewood Golf Course
OWNER
Maplewood Golf Course
8th Green Reconstruction and
PERIOD TO:
ARCHITECT
4050 Maple Valley Hwy
Hillside Drainage
CONTRACTOR
Renton, WA 98058
PROJECT NO.: CAG-04-101
FROM CONTRACTOR:
VIA ARCHITECT:
Dennis S. Buchanan
John Steidel
Buchanan General Contracting Co.
P. O. Box 40069
Bellevue, WA 98015-4069
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.
Continuation Sheet is attached.
1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM .................................. $ 141,850.18
2. Net change by Change Orders ....................
3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ...................................... $ 141,850.18
(Line 1 + or - Line 2)
4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............. $ 141,850.18
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ADDITIONS
DEDUCTIONS
Change Orders approved in
previous months by owner
$ -
$ -
C.O.'s approved this month
$ -
$ -
Number
jDate Approved
TOTALS
$ -
$ -
Net changes by Change Orders
$ -
5. RETAINAGE AT 5%..................................................... $ 7,092.51 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infor-
(Based on line 4) mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed
6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .......................... $ 134,757.67 in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the
(Line 4 less Line 5) Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payment
7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT.... $ - received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due.
(Line 6 from prior Certificate)
8. SUBTOTAL ............................................................... $ 134,757.67 * CONTRACTOR: f Z�O�
(Line 61ess Line 7) By:�t.4►��
Date: ! i
9. Washington State Sales Tax at 8.8...................... $ 12,482.82
(Based on line 4 less prior certificate's line 4) State of: Washington, County of: King
10. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................................... $ 147,240.49 Subscribed and sworn to before me: c� b �
(Line 8 plus Line 9) this �' �� day of /�0 ✓�`�c— ,2 a
11. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE...... $ 7,092.51 Notary Public -
(Line 3 less Line 6) My Commission expires:
i
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ��•`�`•wNoR NT CERTIFIED ....................................................
44 �:$$�O✓M F�lanation if amount certified differs from amount applied,/or.)
In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations CT:
• �+ OUR
data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner Ia N 1B�'!' ;! Date:
the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has
progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the C tr ct 1*11ft CThis•Q er icate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only
Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CER�,� t ntractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment
'�i��,!'�:•` r29j Y out prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract.
process, and additionally, so that Renton can adequately respond to inquiries by
prospective purchasers.
9. Potential Renegotiation
Based upon changed or unforeseen circumstances, Renton or Boeing may
request renegotiation of one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, which
request shall not be unreasonably denied.
10. Termination of Moratorium
Renton agrees that the Moratorium shall terminate or expire on December 2,
2003 or on the date that the Proposal takes effect, whichever occurs first.
11. 2002 Agreement
This Agreement shall not be deemed to amend or supercede the 2002
Agreement, which remains in full force and effect.
12. Recording
This Agreement, upon execution by the parties and approval of the Agreement
by resolution of the City Council, shall be recorded with the Real Property Records
Division of the Ding County Records and Elections Department.
13. Successors and Assigns
This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of Owner and Renton and
their successors in interest, and may be assigned to successors in interest to all or a
portion of the .Renton Plant Site.
14. Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original.
15. Termination
This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2020.
AGREED this Pt day of /Qpr �j).yU , 2003.
[BOEING 11-24-03.doe] 1124/03
Page 18
CITY OF RENTON
By: Jes
Its Mav
e Tanner
ATTEST:
By:
Its
Bonnie I. Walton.
City Clerk
r v2
JV Approv to fo
SEAL,
City Attorney
ColeftelemmInk
its
:`�l�ll�':Ux�Z.��i11,�IC�:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss. ,
+
President
COUNTY OFJSi rA s
On this day of QV iNvrZ-1003, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for the State f Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
Pony appeared #WLto me
known to be the person who signed as ' of the
1 e corporation that executed the foregoing
ged said instrument to be the fire and voluntary act and
deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath
stated that - S�1 was duly elected, qualified and acting as said -officer of the
corporation, that 5W was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal
affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation.
[BOEING 11-24-03.doe] 11/24/03
Page 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the
day and year first above written.
(SignA6 of Notary)
° (Print orstamp name of Notary)
i
•''-•.,;.�•� NOTARY PUBLIC. in and for the .Sete
Of Washington, residing at`(t( e
My appointment expires: b�
(BOUNG Dev Agreement 11-24-03.doo) 11/24/03
Page 20
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
' ) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this _ day of�Mnxbu' 2003, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for the State of Washinoon, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared b I 11til M . A tM MIAk tome
known to be the person who signed as of THE
BOEING COMPANY, the corporation that executed the wAhin andforegoing
instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and
deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath
stated that -6ht— was duly elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the
corporation, that ,%L_ was authorized to execute said instrument. and that the seal
affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation.
IN WITNESS WIEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the
day and year first above written.
Mft%0TA4y' i
Luc
[BOEING Dev Agreement 11-24-03.doc]
(Signature of Notary)
PkMCAA �.
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and -fpr the State N of Washington, residing at I&ML &.
My appointment expires: *)r.-A'Qj0
11/24/03
Page 21
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H located in Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, all in Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., described as follows:
TRACT A (Tax Parcel Nos. 082305-9019, 082305-9209 & 722300-0105 - portion)
Parcels A and B of City of Renton of Renton Short Plat No. 093-89, according to the
short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 8911149006, records of King
County, Washington; TOGETHER WrM that portion of the northwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of said Section 8, lying southerly and easterly of Parcel B of said short
plat and westerly and northerly of Park Ave N, and N. 6d' St., respectively.
TRACT B (Tax Parcel No. 756460-0055)
Lots 1 through 13, inclusive, Block 11 of Renton Farm Plat, according to the plat thereof
recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 97, records of King County, Washington;
TOGETHER WITH Lots 1 through 12, inclusive, of Sartorisville, according to the plat.
thereof recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, page 7, records of King County, Washington;
EXCEPT that portion known as Lot 3 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 282-79, according
to the short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 7907109002, records of
King County, Washington; and EXCEPT roads.
TRACT C (Tax Parcel Nos. 722300 0115 & 722300-0105 - portion)
Blocks 3 and 4 of Renton Farm Acreage, according to the plat thereof recorded in
Volume 12 of Plats, page 37, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WTTH
those portions of the alley vacated under City of Renton Vacation Ordinance Nos. 3319
and 4048 and the street vacated under City of Renton Ordinance Nos. 3319 and 3327 as
would attach by operation of law; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the northwest
quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 8 lying southerly of the southerly right of
way margin of N. 8d' St, easterly of the easterly right of way margin of Park Ave N. and
north of the south 315 feet thereof.
TRACT D (Tax Parcel Nos. 082305-9220, 082305-9221, 082305-9222 & 082305-9011)
Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. LUA-01-056-SHPL, according to the
short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 20011205900004, records of King
County, Washington.
TRACT E (Tax Parcel Nos. 082305-9037, 082305-9152, 082305-9079, 082305-9204)
Those portions of said Government Lots 1 and 2 of Section 7, lying within the abandoned
Burlington Northern Railroad right of way (formerly Northern Pacific, Lake Washington
Belt Line) and northerly of the northerly right of way margin of N.6'' St.; TOGETHER
WrM said northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 8, lying northerly of the
northerly right of way margin of N. 6m St and westerly of the westerly right of way
margin of Park Ave N.; EXCEPT City of Renton Short Plat No. 89-093, as recorded
under King County Recording No. 8911149006; and EXCEPT that portion of said
northwest quarter of the southwest quarter lying southerly and easterly of said short plat;
and TOGETHER WTTH those portions of said Government Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the
southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 8, lying westerly and northwesterly,
respectively, of the westerly right of way margin of Park Ave N. and the northwesterly
right of way margin of the North Renton Interchange (SR 405), westerly of a line that
intersects with said northwesterly right of way margin of the North Renton Interchange,
said line being described as beginning at Station 6+50 on the A -Line of the North Renton
Interchange, SR 405, as shown on Sheet 2 of 5 of PSH 1 (SR 405) North Renton
Interchange, Washington State Department of Transportation Right of Way Plan, and
ending northwesterly, perpendicular to said Station, at a point on the southeasterly margin
of the 100 foot main track of Burlington Northern Railroad, easterly and southeasterly of
the northwesterly right of way line of the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad right
of way (formerly Northern Pacific, Lake Washington Belt Line); EXCEPT from said
abandoned railroad right of way that portion lying northwesterly of a line described as
follows:
Beginning at a point 50 feet southeasterly, measured radially and at right
angles to the centerline of the Burlington Northern main track as now
constructed, from Survey Station 1068+00, said point being on the
southeasterly right of way margin of the 100 foot wide right of way;
Thence northwesterly along said radial line a distance of 25 feet; Thence
southwesterly in a straight line to a point 25 feet northwesterly, measured
from the southeasterly right of way line at Station 1074+00; Thence
continuing southwesterly at an angle to the right, to a point on the
northwesterly margin of the 100 foot Burlington Northern Railroad right of
way, said point also being on the southeasterly line of the Spur Tract at
Headblock Station 8+85.5 and the end of said described line: and
EXCEPT that portion of said Government Lot 2 described as follows:
Beginning at an intersection of the southeasterly right of way margin of said Burlington
Northern Railroad and the northwesterly margin of vacated Mill St (Park Ave N.) per
Vacation Ord. 2513; Thence southwesterly along said southeasterly margin of the
railroad right of way, a distance of 60 feet; Thence southeasterly, at right angles to said
railroad right of way, a distance of 10 feet, more or less, to a point on the northwesterly
right of way margin of said vacated Mill St (Park Ave N.); Thence northeasterly along
said Mill St. to the point of beginning: TOGETHER WITH portion of Vacated Lake
Washington Boulevard adjoining.
TRACT F (Tax Parcel Nos. 072305-9046 & 072305-9001 — portion)
That portion of the SE 1/ of the SE 1/ of said Section 7, lying southerly of N. 61h St.,
westerly of Logan Ave N., easterly of the Cedar River Waterway (Commercial Waterway
No. 2), and northerly of that certain tract of land conveyed to the Renton School District
by Deed recorded under King County Recording No. 5701684.
TRACT G (Tax Parcel No. 072305-9001 & 082305-9187)
That portion of said NE Viand SE 1/ of Section 7, NW 1/ of Section 8, SW 1/ of Section
5, and the SE 1/ of Section 6, lying north of N. a Street, easterly of the Cedar River
Waterway (Commercial Waterway No. 2), westerly and northwesterly of the westerly
right of way line of the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly Northern
Pacific, Lake Washington Belt Line) and northwesterly of the northwesterly line of the
railroad spur track beginning at Headblock Station 8+85.5, westerly of Lots "A!' and `B"
of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-98-176-LLA as recorded under King
County Recording No. 9902019014, and southerly of the Lake Washington Inner Harbor
Line; EXCEPT Logan Ave N.
TRACT H (Tax Parcel No. 072305-9100)
That portion of the Burlington Northern Inc. (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Co.)
100 foot railway right of way in said SE 1/ of Section 7 and SW 1/ of Section 8, lying
north of the northerly right of way margin of N. 4 h Street and southerly of the southerly
right of way margin of N. 6'' Street.
All situate in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
f.
15*
R
P-"
LoQon Ave. N
WIN
0
• en Ave: N
"r
,auo-� VAON\\,-,SN
�� e •'A�ll�f;.
!
1
r•
va
a
;aa=1r;
./r /r.
I,I
OF
19.47 AC
,00
�§ h17vaxitrx,."I J:�etilaaliami,x•rac l�,i,yiiiio�iir�eiiniri�iiii,• .�.riresJi Jeii purl,.. rf..,irr.�>�r� s.:.. o.v000.•�i r� oo.. � � �y.�:.� rr. Jb� u�..� 7-.://////
'
f�
I, r�0�{d! ��, � � ate•
•
TYPICAL. SECTION 1: PARK AVENUE NORTH
FROM PROPOSED LOGAN ;AVENUE TO NORTH. 8TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE
0 8' 16' 32'.
SCALE: 1 "'=16'
FULL BUILDOUT
NOTEt
SECTIONS ARE- DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE C17Y OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS. '
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
EXHIBIT 2A -
Consultlog Engineers
101 Stewart Street, Sulte ' 800
Seattle. Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax 120,6) 382-0500
10 NQVSMSER 2003
4
TYPICAL SECTION .2: PARK AVENUE SOUTH
FROM NORTH STH STREET TO NORTH 6TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITW A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE
79' CA"NO P/
IENVE RICNT OF
_ tY NEW I" NEW
2•V COffMO ROADWAY AND
tURNM�MO I�ANE�ROADWAY TO PE RfVm
IRa
11t1AR10��—TRAFAC�'TRAMO—
LANE LANE WRNINO LANE WR
>S' TREES WRN CRATES ,
DEWAK
UTIMES
1' RICNT Of WAY WIDTH
° ai'
j 'FULL BUILDOUT
SCALE: 1 '-16'
NOTE:
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF
RENTON S I PEE I STANDARDS
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
TREES WIN ORATES y
EXHIBIT 2B
wo Consulting Englneers
101 Stewart Street Sulte 800
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206) 382-0500
0 NOV&SER 2003
IT rltiAL tittr I IUN; 4: LUUAN AVENU
8 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE
5' BICYCLE LANES ON EACH SIDE OF ROADWAY
N'ORTH EXHIBI
T 2C
FULL BUILDOUT
0 8' 16' 32'
SCALE:
NO
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS.
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
Consulting Engineers
101 Stewart Street Sulte 800
Seattle. Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206) 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
TYPICAL SECTION 6: NORTH 8TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIANITURNING LANE
FULL BUILD-OU•T
SCALE: 1 "-16'
NOTE:
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN W ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND 77-!E C17Y OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
EXHIBIT2Q
Consulting Englneers '
101 Stewart Street Sulte Boo
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax f200 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
TYPICAL SECTION ,& NORTH 10TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE EXHIBIT 2E
PULL SWLDOUT
0 8' 16' 32'
SCALE: 1 "-16'
NOTE:
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS .AND THE C17Y OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS.
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE.ILLUSTRATIVE
Consulting Engineers
101 Stewart Street Suite 800
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206) 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
P Uri
i
' ` , EXHIBIT " 5 "
BOEING'S
CONCEPTUAL URBAN RETAIL PLAN
Renton, Washington
Submitted to the City of Renton
November 17, 2003
a
CONCEPTUAL URBAN RETAIL PLAN
Lot 3 and 10-50 Sites
Renton, Washington
Background
The Boeing Company has been working with the City of Renton for more than a year
In evaluating potential redevelopment strategies associated with its 737 facility in
Renton, Washington. This Conceptual Plan illustrates the. Boeing Company's vision
for the redevelopment of the first piece of the Renton Plant to be made available for
non -industrial uses. The Plan includes that portion of the property commonly
referred to as the Lot 3 and 10-50 sites, which have been determined to be non-
essential to the ongoing airplane manufacturing activities as Boeing completes it's
"Move -to -the -Lake" consolidation plan.
The Plan covers approximately 53 to 55 acres of gross land, of which approximately.
8 acres are reserved for the development of four new arterial streets that are
essential to the ultimate redevelopment of the entire 280=acre campus. The.
remaining 45 to 47 acres *of land will be marketed to entities interested in developing
an Integrated retail center on the site, consistent with this Conceptual Plan.
Included within this submittal are a narrative description of Boeing's proposal, a
Conceptual Planning Diagram with supporting pedestrian street sections, and an
economic benefit analysis demonstrating a range of potential one-time and recurring
revenues generated by the proposed development. Boeing seeks the City's approval
of this Conceptual Plan so that Boeing can complete the necessary lot line
adjustments and begin actively marketing the property to local, regional and national
developers and users.
The aerial on the following page highlights the location of the proposed retail site in
relation to Boeing's remaining land holdings -and the surrounding North Renton
neighborhood.
Conceptual Urban Retail Plan
Boeing believes that high -quality retail development is essential to the successful
transition of the area from its industrial roots to the City's vision for the Urban.
Center -North. A well -designed retail center will provide employment, diversify the
economic base, offer a new source of municipal revenue, and will attract other
alternative and potentially higher and better uses to the surrounding area.
The Conceptual Plan for the Lot 3 and 10-50 sites, located on the following page,
Illustrates the cohesive redevelopment of the parcels into an urban retail center. The
Plan contains.a mix of large format "destination" retailers, mid -sized retail anchors,
as well as small shop space concentrated along Park Avenue, envisioned as the
significant pedestrian -oriented street in the area. The Plan responds to the presence
of the existing Fry's building on the property to the east of Garden Avenue, and
anticipates that ultimate redevelopment of the northern portion of that site will relate
directly to the development occurring on Boeing's property.
The site is bound 'by a combination of existing and new public roadways, which
segregate the property Into four quadrants ranging between 6 and 19 acres in size.
Boeing is seeking buyers for the 45- to 47-acre property to undertake a cohesive
redevelopment. Generally, the large format retail development (users with
footprints of 50,000 square feet and larger and building feature heights- up to 45 feet
tall) is planned to occur along 8a', Logan and Garden Avenues, facing inward and
supported by well -organized parking areas internal to the site. These destination
retail uses will naturally locate themselves along the widest portions of the property,
with good freeway visibility, much like the recently completed Fry's development on
the eastern side of Garden Avenue.
Medium format retailers (ranging between 10,000 and 50,000 square feet in area,
with building feature heights up to 40 feet tall) are assumed infill between the large
format tenants, with primary pedestrian entrances facing inward or directed toward
Park Avenue. Again, parking is assumed to be concentrated within each segment of
the site, to allow for potential "second -generation" redevelopment at higher
densities, if achievable.
The northwest quadrant of the property is Identified as one potential location for a
mid- to high-rise development, which could take the form of a multi -level podium
parking structure, with multifamily residential or office uses above. This ultimate
development could initiate the truly urban vision for the area and, together with
pedestrian scale treatments at the comer of Park and Logan; would identify this as
the "gateway" to the Urban -Center North.
Small, specialty retail shops and amenities would be concentrated primarily along
Park Avenue. The scale of development is more intimate here, with an eclectic mix
of uses, architectural styles and gathering places. In some instances, single story
retail uses may be topped with one to three levels of apartments or professional
'• office uses, all overlooking Park Avenue and the activity along the street edge.
Together, the large- and medium -format users total approximately 450,000 square
feet of space; the smaller shop space totals approximately 110,000 square feet, or
20% of the center.
CONCEPTUAL
URBAN
RETAIL
PLAN
r" Of POOWWKd
Mule pwmng *udure
and nusWdM usa
Ow" doftd
opo"fa
rekO too
l000mkow , ,
%r offte a :::=
CONCMUAL PLANNING WGRAM
-,.m
FULLER -SEARS
ARCHITECTS
Fu*"
N I" sk"t
Hierarchy of Streets
Key to the successful development of the property is the reconfiguration and
improvement of Park Avenue to serve as a critical pedestrian -oriented street in the
project. To accommodate full redevelopment of the Renton Plant properties, the
ultimate build out of Park Avenue will need to allow for four travel lanes and a center
turn lane, designed for vehicular travel up to 35 miles per hour. To support the
vision for the development of an urban retail center in this location, a generous
sidewalk with street trees and on -street parking for Park Avenue is being proposed
to enhance the environment in the public realm. and encourage people to make Park
Avenue a pedestrian street. An illustrative street section for Park Avenues_ an be
found on the following page.
The other major north -south connection is Logan Avenue, which extends from 6t'
Avenue to the south and joins Park Avenue in the north. The construction of Logan,
providing direct access to I-405, will be an important alternative through connection
to ensure Park Avenue functions as a pedestrian -oriented shopping street. At the
outset of redevelopment In the area, Logan is envisioned as a three -lane street, with
one travel lane in each direction and a center-tum lane. Ultimately, Logan will
expand and function even more so as a higher -speed arterial.
The east -west arterial roadways, I& and 8`" Avenues, are less critical to the
successful development of.thd urban retail center, other than serving as access
points to the center off of Park Avenue. Connections from I& and a to Logan
Avenue, if constructed, would be favorable, -but the center would function as well
with access only off of Park, the existing leg of 8"' and Garden Avenues.
Urban Center —North Vision and Policies
This proposed Conceptual Urban Retail Plan meets many of the City's vision and
policy statements for the Urban Center -North, which call for "retail integrated into
pedestrian -oriented shopping. districts" and recognizes that:
"At the beginning of this transition, uses such as retail —may be viable without the
office and residential components that ultimately will contribute to the urban
character of the district." The City's vision plans for the transition of the area over a
30-year horizon and anticipates that redevelopment. will need to address -the
potential for future infill to allow areas to further grow to urban densities. This site is
located within District 1, where the City identifies its first objective as follows:
"Create a major commerdal/retail district developed with uses that add significantly
to Renton's retail tax base, provide additional employment opportunities within the
City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a _gathering place
within the community." _
Boeing's Conceptual Urban Retail Plan seeks to both allow for the near -term
redevelopment of Boeing's underutilized assets while advocating for a mix of uses
that improves the City's tax and employment base. As is illustrated within the
attached economic benefit analysis, more than 1,300 jobs would be created in the
City of Renton by a redevelopment of this scale. The City would collect more than
$1.2 million in one-time revenues during development and the City would receive
over $1.5 million in annually recurring tax revenues at full build out.
Summary
Boeing believes that its Conceptual Urban Retail Plan illustrates the optimal
development plan for this 45 to 47 acres of land in North Renton. The Plan offers the
opportunity to contribute to the transition of the area from a primarily industrial
neighborhood to a higher Intensity and range of viable uses, providing both jobs and
a significant source of new revenue to support the City's objectives for the area.
}
{ i _fri a I-(':;;1 , .1. ,a.. ,A7 4 yl+' 1 • r", 1. r ''q.,,Y. ^f, YlL i'. I "'y& f•r. g}c,yd ,:I!%`•,'�
1 fJt I i a I) 1. , _ f.ily f: 7 ^
d!1 I.11 ,II I. , i, rl�� .I IS 1I R diF1 Sjhf �;7.4� -.y tl '.. r y .,.7F f d sklh iF p• +'I
�.. - , i r�I. { r fi - r f ni vtr II i { .r:_,�fJ met h,. y• f rt _ .I 1SI
I�tS(i 111 Ii! F I { "�1;.M r ':. x° i% I."f ^r •» rip.• N! ,d-�1' k . H ir. r .. a• / �' ~ i, 1 r;,-}max e r '1 F" e>pe^t t'.
fli}r,{:�i)t 111 y {r/ ` i a1.�r,�l �ti'Ir 1c, 1C' `li1'Sr�.4 }Mf j� ( ;'�rti?'1 I i�aJ�'E a"� rf 4 }I/YfI y]�,1„.
{}
I;1 Iy' ^ r ,r ; r..i'rJa W 1�;�..,. ;M1 9 a'Aax i F f,l ;1
�I".f I; I ( I ,.'ll I 1'. r II?r ' rrW! }�,.^ a p/) 1-^,. 1... f~k ��Aft ' ral^r 4 - 77y� �1.-a' ¢ f a. '4Yr. ' F ', ( �(I -1 - ,^:
7 7� a ] ! r +!( �. I �t' t 1 yC� i r� n a �, r f I A' I r 1. r r� ' i' ryy.:
I)"R"Yjr't ,,': ^ I n - 4 Gam,,fi I V _r r'� 7 r t . 1'I • 1 1 rf L�wi "• ,l t
IS I P ,, ),•r•`. I% r tl 4 'i l lr'r F . t7� I 'Tt I w, a + rYf�l i li > �I'L' A..; 1 +'�i Via'' `'''t F a j ^ i i -: i /p�
r: 7. " I .yir� I .',((ddFi. t I �: '( ( "I' .il. a f}. �,, ll Ss. Y p 4 u .'. i S pu I' r`. t > , , - r "s'rt
41{f t 666 is '++� f {:r f. { �t r, Ind r{ r+ ii it. 1 ri r wb'
1iY I r rRua�:, l�tl1 � �' f rC. LA u �lrr..��Fi,,�t - yr l'I,,I }II r- s Irk 'hr I+ -I�
' ^+.^ I ff '^ - ' e i/ fA Isf ....,:,� I m n y.. p, 4 �: i " 1 '^ J 7 s "t 1 .� .
t 7` ''. t .,y :. { 11;' ». t r r ; y - w�' ^ t'.T 7, {- F 7r • ..w -i ::
1' rf i..7 i if A RWw h"' }wACa d• �+r�
I r • ap, i �, I � - n r. r�? - p}( f "3 '� u :i - f 7f1 " : !n ".G • r ( L:
'y.7i • l � ' �, �nd•far� S; '• - Ir"Ir^rrit1,r 'W!"I ."1.i �''{ ifi I"% fir. c)+.1 .t - J ,; 1�'�j Px
I t d c 2 < �rA"{r Zak r �a,t,, t �' ". :T p •r• I r '.0 r< - f �,-.Y.:
^ �'I , !-, 11,1. A. � .rr' ,!''� .r eery t�!, r I^'7 I . a1� i rr•..•,- 1 Z. 3^ f Ii ^r '� r f
t i . r , =11 tj + " ! • y* 5 - f n a I "' ' Y 4 ' � 1 t : F - .b ,il .f t i?-.,F iy r l ,ir f . Ay7
J f n,/!/ p „ nr 1 n1 Pu f - p F , c,
r rA 1'1 jl. t�t`, ;t f1 f"A
/��`eePP{p;f r ` '/. I4}'�^ '. K.,�n. •,"',"'l t.'.�+�r��I� �_ "':�V 2J �I�i 41!' lr S Ili. �i ?r l pd'rl� air 2ij�+"m�w„•i,
�a,r b. F lu . a 1. t l�l ' ry;vo .. ' . ty I% f ;r ;.��F"'-" F ` . 5,-fir t;Ft �. �cSN t( ii :L;4 U. .f t" �i :i7a�r" 4 7> � 'S+^ J4.y '''7i
l ''+Ft1:7 II )I" o y'1 !^u,r �. k , l I ti� i > - I ^ r --�—>' N ,
S e T 1✓ 'sy t o Y"" , :1 . $ t .( 5 1 e 1 i '' r
K� 'y5 , h. 71,? r Fi'r.,,,�� rI '' I i 1T,' �+ --1; M1.M' 1 mmm (m t J+ -K S+ .l P r ^ vl A .' f•' ?. �S;{ r. �¢i, s f 1 lx "47, a ,; •/, / ..J./j"rr,;�?• + = _•-., 1 rt {I, :+:9 •,{ I rrra+'-I r t y i }E }: :. Sf. ^,rt' 1 F r..,r , fy r .. 5 i #•, i 'I Ertl/,
all l l ' I )? ,� 7. ( I { ' y o l •! 1 a �!:' ,,, ? n 1 e, ., i f , a a . lS j is , V� ♦ ; t m
r 1 I r(. 1 ! 1 ( �/t / r. S R �ru „Xt. .a 1 : ry A l ,nw•,lrl r;y :LiI , y F..� p.; ,,'
i r p.r!. l '} r-Y e .( ,/,rP�% r j�r .3)' r"I,i^S.,� t a:r•4-'r a°��' ru ly f t¢'• /Yr ,;,nd l6e rT" ' !Il trd! Is Ir,L.yL'a !'•
1 7- I` I '.r 'y, f'✓'i ay7 /% � 4, ,,. q¢- I. F5q• 'n r�R 7:1' G +, t �. rI, r r„d r r ..:.I. I I.I $d a" 4wr r
tiy,ir+�; I I ' It> l' R/ ,/ f rlr4y ) :V �A11' I, 15 ^i�r2 a 1nti.'. u�r i� l a'fi f a :1�,1� r I t 1: 1:
II I}i1, -I 1 1. yl ,a N 7` 1 SIIt'i r .i , 4`¢, r,pll �,�; �sil` �r,q r�rf�l\� i 11}14 .df 7.. II i 1'i'^tM P S r'L•o)
t I I .. f' i I, ,l , t!I l .' f F - ^l 1 I I.
i � . rat . .S : �.i 1. fiF Y/1 n �. , I 1 d i .L. ; \ f 5 � � � f -- ' . C � t. f 1 hr'J'
r ," q p
q ,t_ 1 f'f f 9 'rl , '-•l „^ 1 1 0, %, 'I" . .,', I IA' • 1Zl,"�£ i . vl /r F'� f ) a I I 1 I ^ ....h `r f I.
10
Y sw
, „�-i u t -i•.. j.b 1�.., s,, t ,�+d ;S.rl :'Yf - _'.ram •.. .r 9 rt'➢, Q!
it 'i 1, i '.ry j ^' �. \Y r .A.. S .�3 1 'I' .K :' f• IIf 1. ✓''s 1. '%'' : Y I .1/:
,,.: ��( I F+ A'. I; r�j' .�i Ati ,qua lr��r lt" 'i It S ,f ,r {l] 1 r �P '1. �.,� -� pF Q?
I r 1 \ 1 3 t : Ra q 1... fit• ry r. tf t b i �,.,,. r► R"� r {I (u I-;.,' r
1�: /7 r' 'P f C' 'r1 /rCt� S. yrl l.)11 ^� f'i i..,�5 l f f F �f y f ill Ju7� 1i 1�ik'!� �1, { N �I'+ �11�„ FCC _;4 J . 1.��,',,r ,j,S
Is 7:': , b{ d; +F 1 f J,1 '. a i. r I r 1\ j y,n y. Y id a i ., f ��� (
r�irls1' id':I!• 7 iat��� 4 i..:• it CI y,^ a^! d i.�l j f n:.i .t,� �'� t +J.f ,ii/;" p t
(61,y'�'� ;�~ •,1r 11 e 4; r.1.0 y� y ox^ i �5:.'.c rt ,ti � I+.7'"r t' { ( lr ^ .•A...0 i1i r7:.
i �:; l yur 1 �� di p {i
i a \ . {NIIA, nal ^ ¢:, iY `tie ; i n-f! z 1' ',1 .may nr/ I.¢ :r ,,t Y x uitF ir' 4r
�t . � f1;,,. 7Ai,j d . G ;. P. t . � 6tt , e� , v +n ""�.l : !�' j , y y i . I,y - i - y 6 > . i.':'.
I' .,_r^1.':i t� � I''.r l-Ry,l.�ry�li r.h: L-% {'' ti Ri....u� � ...a }6 i; rl'•AI III �^..a�,• ��I!::'.N:,E:..1y�I 14, isl 't-'':'�I ,I,v '.�'Lr.� ) ,r r�;, r 1'. 'r��n
p;f 11 1t. Yr �'! .:�J, �r Pt.F� r' 41: ° i -': ^• 5 �..�.yy ♦ 1� .a ,lf„ n] I . 1 r n, ` ✓. r.y +r i utY L rr.� , ,ram { r ;1
f Rv. i t'u ,+ I ?i,� 1*n �. �r Y ', :.b\. -+I _ ,TJ "•, c r:,t., 1, .,,l, /ii i RFI d ..'1 -i ^ 1! t - f •q 1 q 4 '.; -.r { ; r Ir{
+t1x7{fr ,¢a� .I:j�t ,2. w tstz i r .-, �t 'r C d. la .IIa t fi, I �t9 , f t. lr t r ' 'S.» I 'r' _ ISAWt ! .n 5r1� +`�}�;s, -j
'"'eta �,}, 1/'�tll an- -�'- " h,fil �S.��w, 1'r`nI (,ar', rl. rtl I,,,r7e •, ,. plr rl�r.: * �;' i,7`yrI; ., ,.(r•„ ��r ""f„ F .ft S";�
7 ^ "" a r .7 c '� 1 (b;Ci: 1 r x ` 4yr!, 4 . a ^i ,q'i-. .,` .f -'' � T i � � 1n' S 4,01 , ii� 4 f � r it' r s r .:t %I'. _r -f,
:11
1l.. :S'rl 7 " t e d� �' l.11 " r >l1, Y n`1 Y r� rf+ Si ! St , -
1{ r" 1 I "r r- 1 ., I I I. N „ S Ir d .0t
b n%plia ;. I i vrSS .tb�t>5J �,. il.y .r'I` r{ rS ) I eJ :1 i �, -1 I +)`�41.'rj�•jA-!^;�.:
I^ t '1: In .:� JI% I , (. g}fr'�,t' y 1 :/ /t .I 1 I 4 C } : Iy .•'4r r.
J I,, ".a t ppgg2/r + , IR ,, '1 �^"t9 1 .n, ' 1 . r+ +,i I A I(r P ,f 1 i t I riJ+r m•.—.id p� 1y Y j 1 . ; t r j { r`i ��" f r • /Ifli�' d^,
u,. g%,. J'e '�F .yi ., i , e I ;t - " S yl' , r �, {. 41P , , ,:f I r + I . r1' I g�l !fir t-r ` e 1 ;I. iii tf S Ja
t °M: r' �l . I t :i r..� r 1 ' l.'a1}�'"1� i ".i. R f t. I rk.P1:r �,d '"l:") l� .I ,l �, 111 ,1•il yy <`.�
rc�. - %,! r.ly, ,l'.a r i' r r r M It S- Jl ,p A,, r >, I t 1 0.1 u t A 1
1f1 4 1j( ' Y -.l f? 1 i.: A 1.1 I.Y' _�,j Y A J .1'"r :i1 1.�:�J Illtr I l il,, r itl r, 1�1M '�j ,��
k, //} +i+4+eF4 `- r ,, t R:, t s i I�.^ i' r 1 ' a• , pp y11
i� A 1�� I i }tI !r C k " 4 1,
r 7 sue' r ,- � `` '• , " . tl i
' 1 t P ¢i i' 1 ? ,• ", ^ 1 d-1 } u.f:. :1 , sR.k ' *^.'C If I fr ' a `!, ■
1l, �,.�:I P `.. 1. " �'. , ji.; ( , , { ._., . I a r� 11^. r i { 7' Jrl { 1 yl I ,
l e,. It �. d a' tI l,: i 4 ♦ { Tlw .r a. t 1 z' J rrr y
y .y, f 'j �S r i 7R 4 uit�u- r +..�•.\i4{r5 :,.� x Iq +eir�i 1 r•1 (a6 1 I j :.;5 ' J:t+ If i• i'. , �7
,�K"�,. 1 ,�� r, 'i ^ i� /tnvrva.i it 79. .1 �y.d ^�ejl i, I S�r �, ' +r `jM r - t� iFIR?ti;ALA-...
11�-+ ," p / t t r ;* ,64 il.,. Iba�yt} r, iyld r,a d4� i ,- '.,. y t J I ti-' rgr I e� r
Ir
l5 1 i - t •, 414,'•a•�c ". {r. 46.1 ..I ,N�,` �.. S .'r', + 11 ' I i 1 f.r �{ fi f I>.:.1 °n..
�111
r '..p , r,1n�-y , S� Alr •, 1 1".I 1 %^°' i r,{'I 11 .{i:� �i 1 q.,7 f ri7i l.y j,
gK r r';t 7 M �w; 7 , `II' r f P n ',a ,y!I t , -( r. '! i�' rr ^ : j f{ fr,r ,i a,L '�, y 1 ;' S-, , S. 8, o n.
"tW..�.l'+.-w,,,:r '.,ati 7 1 _. 1 JM^. I .;i rs 1." s. 1 ( t { a.��l R��1. n 1. • I, 1 1,,1111� trr. �:
Iry a m wp, " \ ri11 rr''uw.t , - ,a ,y,•::,KF w I J I ,d 5 ^ c C r f tl. it`:a:
' �. - (^ c a 11 i. l 1 li . I' l +i3_y_. ' ,.. _ y I' � iiO' r 2 , " I. n ,-1:N....�.. - ,) � � k , t .. i { r �-I f � � S
^ ^ • I 1 Y } + 7'. I : ,`4,,� , .i . 1" I f l I - ri %I .Y+ar,r•! ,tl u, r ! s t:: ^. 'r r�r-r >/ i -p..
..}j i MI +" a rre„A Ir1 r , p'. _ �F+'Sf I{r{t{� 1l1�Pllj( ����.-y�71 -i '� e a 1 1 �, y �' - .
t iA I I"q i i > iw r16, f1 I� r.W Jp. , r.•, , "I r �.;� }r
�. 7d4 - t , ai a r r,'.!4> " n 1. r ?
, e!' 4 r r,. ' 4 "tr J l t yr \ n ^ 7 i ( r+^+1^"� , r 7 r' :
lit ¢ - >k:': 1 (: y�, r! - 1 h ` ��� +� �7 >
e ,tall �, a r 4 ,4;^ � 5. . jrr.«: M �i i r } -: ,� 1
cute ;1'^p •., f;il t w , . :' �vt ,,,ys,. �, r:r f .t- Fr �Nr�l trl.,I k: pl Yt3 ,16 7! k 1.{4
`y. r } 1 cr ,�I�C,- t aA 1 r� jam, d .4 y �y�hr r I{ "F W t 1 l �L r ..
r n 11 .r ,hy �, +;, i l ,PWI
i .� t I ( I. w 9+ I 7,�t 0 \ ) 1Dy1yA`,nli r I r 11 t,� fY ,� %3�3"uti>ph r�i�", yA!
l a f' y I ; V N I :r 1 w: i,.l 1, .�, I, \ , I b� a: r• + !
it ''". �� , ,w 1i p I + .^el d^ 1 ,l�' i { II , iI11 Js '--.
mot { ' j," .�Y F. .; I 'f{ 1u / , I i+r a �'f i ' + r
' I
^ i :
,� ^+ r n,r S a �v+f 1, 1. r , h Ityt•rf n I i y I.
► , ¢, ¢ e i'i" 'Rt T ,~i .�^ �jr' , ^ • ^ I I aI �( ^+ °^ ,., I "�r 4 ; ...i.
.1 r I 7'_ ra^ 7 ri�.v. tS 5'.ru > , 1 1 ;, .•'. ,, / I. I% I I
CITY OF RENTON ECONOAHC BENEFITS
Retail Redevelopment on Part of Boeing s Renton Plant Site
Economic benefits to the City of Renton of re -developing 46 acres of the Boeing
Renton, Washington plant site follow. Derivation of these benefit estimates is based
on a set of realistic assumptions that correspond to development of 451,000 square
feet of retail big/medium box space and 110,000 square feet of retail shop space.
➢ At full absorption of the above 561,000 square feet of retail space on a
-redeveloped portion of the Boeing Renton plant site; it is: estimated that 2,197
permanent jobs would be created throughout the region.
➢ Of this total, a projected 1,132 direct jobs would be -created at the targeted 46-
acre Boeing Renton site plus 266 additional indirect jobs within the City of
Renton, assuming a 25 percent capture rate.
➢ It is estimated that these 1,398 direct and indirect jobs in the City of Renton
would generate an additional $45.4 million in recurring .annual income earned
-inside the City once full occupancy of this new retail space occurs at the
Boeing Renton plant site.
➢ The corresponding increase in property values by redeveloping this 46-acre
portion of the Renton Boeing site into retail uses is forecast to total nearly $66
million upon completion in 2009.
➢ The increase m annually recurring tax revenues to the City of Renton at full
build -out is estimated -at over $1.5 million starting in 2009.
This is in addition- :to over $1.2 million in one-time City revenues collected
.during. land redevelopment and the construction of 561,000 square feet of retail
space on a part of the Boeing Renton plant site during the 2004-2008 period.
I I/13/03 REAL ESTATEECONOAfICS'
The data and calculations presented herein while not guaranteed, are obtained from sources deemed reliable.
PERMANENT JOBS CREATED IN 2009
1600CITY OF RENTON
1,398
1200
0
3 800
m
z
400
0 0
With Project Without Project
$50.0
E $40.0
0
0 $30.0
w
0
$20.0
0
$10.0
$0.0
$1,600
124 $1,600
!0 $11,400
0° $1,20o
4-
0 $1,000
C $800
q $600
0 $400
1 "- $200
so
NEW JOB ANNUAL INCOMECREATED IN 2009
With Project Without Project
NEW CITY OF RENTON TAX REVENUES
2003 2004, 2005 2006 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
■ Land Dev. ■ Building Dev. ■ Pennanent Taxes
CURRENT ZONING SCENARIO
REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
Charts
0
wuh
WWWA
,lobs
Z197
Wmnw - mlHons
S so
_
Property Market Values- nWa�s
S 97.74
i 31.75
Selected State Revenues - mi9iosa
10.47
S 0.114
NEW PERMANENT JOBS CREATED BY 2009
2AW
X197
2AW
IAA
1,000
ow
With Projed Without Project
NEW JOB ANNUAL INCOME IN 2009
tao
$so
sla
o.
0
� raa
o'
� tao
W.
With Project Without Project
R.ra, ufwn vwQ.?-FIWA t v13uW I
n<axaWW=k-es ww«reaW"-06nXPAWANabMb m*Vaiwkm�otftbMwmdaa.saew. RM6STAWEC0N Ws
smowiw32ivts27ydv'ryq�•i�a4vo"Nro+ro�'b+Y'oaw!+Ao�+�a�wrova. w-w4-w..var—w -Fr mn■woo«u
c,e,e cactnt ro�� �»vn �w►u
SUOIJ W W steps
as Ott It st M tt f
WOO tS(aw tMM
KVO3 POWd utoiMM
S3fiwwm 31V13 JNRI2t(1 m M3N
saxvi Wm ausd0 saxel' pHM9• saxei'eq pue�■
UN gm Me an sm Mot LOOT 9w sm vw sm
W"
3
M os E
2
N
Os's!
wets
aus
S3nN3A3H XV131V1S M3N
Sve43 .
AssurMtiohs
Redevelopment Land
Total buildable redevelopment land area --- rner acres
Total buildable redevelopment land area-*mC sq. IL
Land Development
Land Development Construction Costs
Land improvement construction duration - years
Percent design & management
Percent construction labor
Percent materials
Building Development Parameter
Change in assessed value
Percent design and management -commercial
Percent construction tabor - commercial
Percent construction materials 4 services - commercial
BMV multiplier for design and management
Bitting multiplier for construction
Property development duration - year;
.Retafl-BtglMed Box
Gross square feet of retail space
Load factor -retail space
Building construction cost /sq.ft.-retail space
Sq It Per employee - big box retail
Retail sales per sq. fL--big box total
Retall-Shop space
Gross square feet of retail space
Load tadur-retell space
Building construction cost /sq.ft.-retail space
Sq It per employee -Shop Spada
Indirect jobs mdtiptier for land development construction jobs
Wired jobs multiplier for regular constudion jobs
Share of inbred jobs captured by Renton
Share of indirect Income captured by Renton
WKVCo. est. average FTE wage for dared recurring retail jobs on -site
King Co. average annual wage for all kxked jobs
King Co. average annual wage for project dwjW*nanagernent
Average annual wage for one-time construction jobs
mrplum rare as 7601 total assessed value of redevd
Real estate tunwver rate
Total assessed value of'existi W reuse property land
'Model remb we rat guaranWed, but are based on what: we
1,989,821 Heartland
14.314.177 Heartland
1.0 REE/ Heartland
10.0% REE
36.0% REE
54.0% REE
66.996.257 From AV estimates
10.0% REE
36.0% REE
54.0% REE
2.5. REE
2.0 REE
4.0 Heartland
451,000 Heartland
5% Heartland
120 Heartland
600 REE
275 REE
110.000 Heartland
5% Headland
130 Headland
$30.000 JESD & REE
$43.000 ESD $ REE'
$65,000 REE
$49,000 REE
10.0%
S 16,548,400
Renton Urban Village-P-FINxr,11113103 Par 1
The data end cWarl r— prese.ded hereby whee rot P-Mised. Nave bean obtained tom sources WWjad so be reliable. REAL ESTATE ECON
Summary
-One-time Land
Development
One-time Building
Development 2005-2008
-Recurring
to 2009
JOBS
Direct Jobs
61
73
1,132
Indirect Jobs
91
122
1,065
Total Jobs
153
196
2,197
INCOME
Dined income
$
3,149,119
$
15,052,400
$
33,962,600
Indirect Income
3,922.789
21034 316
45,807,488
Total income
$
7,071,908
$
36,086,716
$
79,769.988
PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES
Not applicable
Not applicable
$
65,996,257
TAX BASE INCREASES
Assessed Valuation
Not applicable
Not applicable
$
65,996,257
Retail Sales
$
12,882,759
$
61,578,000
$
143.948,750
Real Estate Sales
Not applicable
$
97,742,857
$
6,599,626
Gnus Business Receipts
$
14,314,177
$
68,420,000
$
143,948,750
SELECTED TAX REVENUE INCREASES
(Property, sales, B&O and real estate)
State Taxes
Z
1,189,652
$
5.143.454
$
10.356,729.
Local Taxes
City of Renton --prop_ arty 100% In city
$
245,167
$
959,786
$
1,554,562
King Cou 0% in coup
$
17,392
$
83,130
$
95,695
Renton Urban V"ge-P-flN.W.11113103 Page 1
The dam and cafarfaB presented herein whfle not W-wA ed. hew lean obtAW from waves beKev b be r WAO. REAL ESTATE ECONOWS
Business Receipts
Land Use
Net
Retail Sales Annual
Annual
Soft
per soft Retail Sales
Employment
Gross receipts
Retail—BiglMed Box
428,450
$ 275 $ 117,823,750
714
$ 117.823,750
Reta"hop Space
104,500
$ 250 $ 26125 0oo
418
$ 26125 000
TOTAL
532,950
$143,948,750
1,132
$143,948,750
Renton Urban Ydfage—FINjd,11113/03 page 1
The data and calmlatiom presented herein while riot puerwdood, have been obtakW from sowm believed to be reliable. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
Taxbases
One-time through
Land Deve nt
Assessed Valuation
Real Estate Sales $29,322,857 $
Retail Sales $ 12,882.759 $
Gross Business Receipts $ 14,314.177 $
One-time Building
-lopne t 2005 thru 2006 1 On-goina at 2009
$
65,996 257
97,742.857
$
6,599.626
61.578,000
$
143,948,750
68.420,000
$
143,948,750
Renton Urban Wtage-P—FIN.x1.11/13M
The data and cakuWAom presentee hw9ja wide not guaranteed, have boon obtained h m soumes beibeved to be reliable.
Page 1
REAL ESTATE ECONOMCS
Assessed Valuation
Start Year 2005
By Lana Use Sq Ft Cost )Sq Ft
___. -- _ . --
Va!ue/ Ft of Total
Lana
. vsm now
Ay
Retaf—BiglMed Box 451.000 $ 120.00
$54.120.000. 30%
$23.194.286
577.3142W
ReWA—Shop Spam 110,000 $ 130.00 _
$14,300,000 30%
56.128,571
- 0 428 571
SUBTOTAL $
Less a ng land vakohon
_
:68.420.000
529.322,857
397. 742.857
Less existing improvement valuation .
TOTAL INCREASES 561 oon -
-($16,U8,400)
(515, 198,200)
—. ,.� ..,._
Renton Urban village-P—FINA.11113103 Pap 1
The data and CW-WWM pas~ hwo st" not WWWAesdt hers bean obtained * m sources beMww to be MW*. REAL ESTATE ECOMMOCS
Start Year 2005
Commercial
New SgFt Per Net Gross
Retal—BQNed Box 714 600 428,450 451,000
Retail —Shop Space 418 250 104,500 110,000
TOTALS 1.132 532.950 561.000
Renton Urban Wage-P—FIN.A.11113N3 Page 1
The data and calculations presenW herein W& not guamnteW, have been obtained from sources believed lobe reliable. REAL MATE ECONOMICS
Onetime Jobs
Item
From Development
Of Land
From Development
Of Buildings
PROFESSIONAL JOBS
Design and management costs
$
1,431,418
$
6,842,000
Average salary
$
65,000
$
65,000
Billing multiplier
2.5
2:5
Professional job years
9
42
Total professional wages
$
672,567
$
2,736,800
Annual professional wages
$
572,567
$
684.200
Project duration in years
1
4
Professional jobs created
9
11
CONSTRUCTION JOBS
Construction labor costs only
$
5,153,104
$
24,631,200
Average salary
$49,000.
$49,000
Billing multiplier
2.0
2.0
Construction job years
53
251
Total construction wages
$
2,576,552
$
12;315,600
Annual construction wages
$
2,676.552
$
3.078,900
Project duration in years
1
4
Construction jobs created
53
63
Total Equivalent New Jobs
.61
73
Annual Wage Income for New Jobs
3,149,119
3.763,100
Total Wage Income for New Jobs
$
3,149,119
$
16,052;400
Renton urban Wage-P—FINxr.1111=3 page 1
The data end cala,ledions preseMed herein while not paranWed, have been obtained *M Wurm believed to be neGeblM REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
Recurring Revenue
WA State
Recurring revenues
2009
Tax Base
2002 Maximum 2009
Tax Rabe Revenues
Property Tax
$65,996.257
$3.WW $237,687
Safes Tax
$143,948;750
6.50% $9.356.669
B & O Tax'
$143.948,750
0.471% $W.999
Beal Estate Transfer
$6,599,6261
128% $84,475
TOTAL
$10,356,729
Kipp County
Recurring revenues
2009
Tax Base
2002
Tax Rat
2009
Revenues
Property Tax
$65,996,257
$1.4500
$95,695
Sales Tax.
$0
1.00%
S0
B & O Tax
SO
0.00% .
$0
Real Estate Transfer
t0
0.50%
TOTAL
.
$95,m
City of Renton
Recurrino avenues
2009
Tax Base
2002
Tax Rat
2009
Revenues
Property Tax
$65,996,257
$3.3500
$221,087
Sales Tax
$143,948,750
0.85%
$1223.564
B & O Tax
$143,948,750
0.00%
$0
Real Estate Transfer
$6,599.626
0.50%
$W1998
Head TaWr
1,398
W-00
$76 912
TOTAL
$1,&A.562
-we xa® Odv lax rate Tor reietl m .
i
Renton Urban Vftge-P--FINA 11113M3 _ Page 1
The data OWcOclolations presented herein WOO not puWaneeed, have been obmkred hom smoes believed ro be rek". REAL ESTATEECONOANCS
Onetime Revenue
WA State
One
Land Dev.
Budding Dev.
2002 Tax
udding Dev.
time revenues
Period Tax Base
Tax Base
Rate
Lea
Revenues
Sales Tax
$ 12,882,759
$ 61,578,000
6 509G
10 00%$3,602,313
B & O Tax•
S 14;314,177
$ 68,420,000
0.471%
10.00%290.032
M$37
Real Estate Transfer
S 29 322 857
$ 97742,857
1.28%
0.00%$1
TOTAL
1 109
5.143.454
Kkg COY
Land
BUWAV D. 2002 Tax
Land Dov.
Building D.
One tines avenues
Period Taxx BassSales
Base Rate
T
S 12,882,759
$ 61,578,00o 0.15% 10.00%
Reveaws
517,392
Revenues .
$ 83,130
B 3 O Tax
$ 14.314,177
$ 68,420,000 0.00% 10.00%
$0
$
Real Estate TrarvAer
$ 29,322,857
$ 97.74Z857 0.00% 0.00%
$0
S .
TOTAL
517,39Q
S 83.130
City of Renton
Land Des.
Building Dev.
2002 Tax
Land Dev.
Bu"" Des.
One time revenues
Period Tax Base
Taz Base
Rate
Lealcmis
Rwenu"
Revenues
Sal" Tax
$ 12,882,759
$ 61,578,000
0.85%
10.00%
- 598,553
S 471,072
B 8 O Tax
$ 14,314,177
S 68,420.000
0.00%
10.00%
$0
$
Real Estate Transfer
$ 29 322,857
$ 97 742A57
0.50%
0.00%
$148 614
i 714
TOTAL
$245.167
$859,786
'Wa Stale ti30 Tmc raw rn. Ada....
Renton Urban Village•P—MA,11113AD3 Page 1
The data end oaladations W— tad herein while not 9—arteed, tme been ob%k od from sources believed to be reiwble. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
Boeing CPA - Estimated Cost for Water Infrastructure Improvements
10/16/03
Phase 1
Cost
without
Length
Cost
with street
street
restoration
Location
From
To
In ft.
restoration
**
1
Park Ave N.
Garden Ave N.
N. 8th St
2000
$
500,000
$
459,500
2
N. 8th St. extension
Park Ave N.
Logan Ave N.
1300
$
325,000
$
298,675
3
Logan Ave N.
N. 8th St.
N. 61h St.
1300
$
325,000
$
298,675
1- Pressure reducing
4
station at West Hill Pump
$
200,000
$
200,000
5
N. 10th St.
Park Ave N.
Garden Ave .N.
650
$
162,500
$
149,338
Subtotal 1 to 4
$
1,512,500
$
1,406,188
Phase 2
6
Logan Ave N.
Garden Ave N.
N. 8th St.
2700
$
675,000
$
620,325
7
N. 10th St
Houser Way
Garden Ave N.
900
$
225,000
$
206,775
8
N. 10th St
Park Ave N.
Logan Ave N.
950
$
237,500
$
218,263
2 -Pressure reducing
9
stations at Highlands
$
'200,000.00
$
2000000.00
3-200 ft water stubs to
10
prop.erties west of Logan
600
$
150,000
$
137,850
Subtotal 6 to 10
$
1,487,500
$
1,383,213
Total 1 to 10
$
3,000,000
$
2,789,400
Future Res6rvolr In Kennyda/e 320-zone
$
51000,000
$
51000,000
* Note:
,ost excluding street patching for 6 ft wide x 6" thick asphalt patch over water line trench within streets
vhere new water lines will be Installed - Asphalt cost estimated at $901ton
I/Abdoui/boeing/booing-infrastructure-cost-est.0i,xis-10/6/03
Exhibit 6A
x.Z1 " a �.ztfl A' �1<
o
O D i
e ! �• -�O v �i G a a _ ° zt4,0
ao
O a ua �
S . " ry
AIaN 12' „ •9 N 2
>lJod�?.X co
C.
I I I I h�• � m � n _� � �, .zt
9
I l o �z N any uo6o� 8'
a3'
I I I i p>}>�I I J '1 I ' 6.9
CD
I I I
I I I I I�— I I al I al I I I It I � t-
e m �4
II II I I I I I I Nishiw°k� °n 12 a 8a
RNER ® #}{
J 3 3 I I I CEDE 12 N
Li
N
ILIl I'I' Aver
I � I , p , 9 io I , I , � Cedar
� I i �' 2 In I �I "I I I I I I•crl € � ���' �� �, �`�
112
I µ && I I ( ! d Qt zt �i s 10
.x
a
o
a e H
1
n
0 OfO m
!— z w
z W In
W
:2 W
Q
z
W
zg
m O
C,fw
ww
Q 0
�i Q
o °-
W U
N
O
0- Z
�o
am
z
Z
� Q�O
00o
a0
Z�
x
�v
wad
30 N^z
000
a
;'4 ;3tea
ZM Z N
QNN
a
?I a
9 NOI�l3SVHd
S1N3W3AOadWl a313ltlMWHO1S O3SOdOtld
ro •si 1N3WON3WV NV ld AWOO NO-N3tl-ON13O8
.,
Nomau
dO AM
•-
• .a a,y�� '•�
.r. aadv nw
M aamau
ox
L 1 I g I H X
---
�
l aul
;ws
� d
„bZ X3
„4Z X3
I iMus lus luao I '
❑El
,I I
is
i
I
ro
w
1
X
N
I i D
e
® I^
r
m
x
Vi
I
`
ti
m
a
r
N
o
I
"L a O
O
a.o x3
lOY LiYlt IW m11011
N
^ A
a
QQ o
\� C,
D
1 ,
CD
S�vb3
cy-
C>
W801S doad
WaoiS x3
p
S�dl�3
�i
„t
CI
_._... _ d 1
X3. 09
9NIHSd x°
��d3i"0 0IM * "," ,va .
goo
ova
8 uo*-Inwing IV101 '+pro °uaN re/a'mNwa nru a i
S1N3W3AObdW1 83IVMWHOIS 03SOdOtld 1101.PI e
1N3WON3WV NVId'dWOO NOINBU-DN13O8 d0 a.ua
� a
1\ �SIV131Vl ,dl aNtl ,84 t
.a`
E
L lIEIHX3
S1V831V1
oe al 3ztsdn llv3ina ,o a
_ 1S H19 173N
---- iHa ON .,0E 01 3ZI i Dais KW
❑iva i —
o b
j � n
s
^ o
o
x
D X I U I
� r
N A
D
fn I
o�l 31tl1 ,21 aNV ,BI Q O
g" �m tncs in ®ow
8 0 X3 ro 1 Q
Nm
m ti x
co I
�v
S1tl831V1 ,ZI aNV ,8I Q
i W
v
N
r
N
.O
7
f
r b�
pl
19NIHSd
ova �a
Boeing Comp. Plan Amendment
Phase 1 Stormwater System Improvements - Option B
Storm
Item Q....-..r�
ROW ROW Length of . Cost Water Quality Water Total Cost
1
----
BOC John's Creek to N 10th St
orr
12" laterals
.e,r ur ,l
1 800
nrea ar
264 600
Latemla r
$107 141
FaClll #
Quality $
w/out Restoration
2
BCC N 10th St to N 8th St
New 24" & 12" laterals
1 100
161 700
.,891
422
$307 482
1
1
$240 534
$146 993
$347 675
$454 475
3
BOC N 8th St to N eth St
New 24" & 12" laterals
1,200
176,400
481
$335 419
1
$160 356
$495 775
4
Park Ave N BOC to N 10th St
12" laterals
670
69 010
397
$61 479
1
$62 733
$124 212
5
Park Ave N N 10th St to N 8th St
12" laterals
840
86,620
497
$77 078
1
$78 651
$155 729
6
N 10th St Park Ave N to Garden Ave N
New 18" A 12" laterals
T..�el
685
a ner
59,595
e.� ene
406
$192 994
2
$64 176
$247 168
SOC = Boulevard of Champions (Logan Ave)
• Assume ROW 90% impervious, 10% landscaping.
Diameter
Cost ($!If)
• Assumed costs Include permitting, engineering, design, materials,
12
155
construction, and Inspection of pipe, cbs, backftll, eta
•18
190
"Assume half -width Improvements on BOC
24
220
'Water Quality Facilities
30
365
-Facility 01 At Logan and Park Ave N
36
610
-Treatment Area: Logan Ave (N 6th St to Park Ave N) & Park Ave N (N 8th St to Logan)
48
655
-Size: 440' x 20' x12'
-Facility #2 At N 10th St and Barden Ave N (W of Garden Ave N)
-Treatment Area: N 10th St (Garden Ave N to Park Ave N)
Phaselandlistorm.As
I I-+", -I 1 $ I,010,V:14
Exhibit 7
Boeing Comp, Plan Amendment
Phase II Stormwater System Improvements. Option B
Storm
HAMStorm
ROW ROW Length of Water Quality Water Total Total
Cost wl Cost wiout
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BOC John's Creek to N 10th St
BOC N 10th St to N 8th SO
BOO N 8th St to N 6th t
Park Ave N Lake WA to BOC
Park Ave N N 8th St to N 6th St
Park Ave N N 6th St to N 6th St
N 10th• t BOC to Park Ave N
N 10th St Garden Ave to -406
N 8th St (BOO to Park Ave N
N 8th St Park Ave N to Garden Ave N
N 8th St Garden Ave N to 1-406
N 6th St Cedar River to OC
N 6th St BOO to Park Ave N),
Outfall #10 lake WA to BOC
-
-•�• �• �
12" laterals
12" laterals
12" laterals
New 12" & 12" laterals
12" laterals
12" laterals
New 18" & 12" laterals
Now 18"656
12" laterals
New 18" & 12" latenrla
12" aterals
New 48" & 12" laterals 1
U size to 30"
U size to 30"
U size to 36"
TA}st
.o u# ,i
1 600
1.100
1 200
1 200
1.320
660
930
1 016
1 080
806
1,250
1.280,
1,050
1 800
4- d m
rnwn tor
264 e00
161.700
178 400
123 600
135,960
67.980
80 910
88 306
108.000
80.6
125,000
160 000
67 200
-
;i QAA 4 & r
LaTUMIS R
922
664
e14
710
781
391
551
601 '
b88
438
680
758
622
a nnn
t•acu x
2
1
1
7
2
2
14r3,551
4
1
5
6
Quality$
$0
$0
0
$112,358
123 69
61 697
80 273
$98177
$73178
$113 631
Restoration $
$165,0601
$101,6201
110 520
458,1581
$284 174
264174
$132 681
408 878
$438 217
$152 018
$1 111 031
$512 000
Restoration $
$142,910
$87 420
$95 170
$408,408
$244 849
$244,649
402
$335
$368 278
$394 517
$141,068
$1 037,781
$467 200
$420 000
990 000
$383 250
$918 000
%pi QV FJUa �y�7,OJ 1,"I.J4 40,144,7U8
Ev�ibit -1752
')
Boeing Comp. Plan Amendment
Total Buildout (Option 8) Stormwater System Improvements
Storm ROW ` ROW Length of Water Quality Water
IfCrn c�
Total Total
Cost w/ Cost w/Out
1
BOC John's Creek to N 10th St
12" laterals
Q„ ,„ MI
1,800
nree tori
264,600
Laterals n
1 813
118CHITY IF
2
QU811tV$
Restoration $
Restoration $
2
BOC N 10th St to N 8th St
New 24" & 12" laterals
1 100
161,700
988
1
$240 534
$148 993
530 874
$599 473
$490,549
$541 823
3
BOC N 8th St to N 8th St
New 24" & 12" laterals
1,200
178 400
.1 075
1
$180,356
$653 858
$590,981
4
Park Ave N Lake WA to SOC
New 12" & 12" laterals
1,200
123 600
710
7
112 358
$466,158
$408 408
5
Park Ave N B00 to N 10th St
12" laterals
670
69,010
397
2
$82 733
$134193
$124,288
6
Park Ave N N 10th St to N 8th St
12" laterals
640
$6 520
497
2
$78,881
$168 111
$155,H86
7
Park Ave N N 8th St to N 8th St
12" laterals
1 320
135 96
781
2
123 594
$264,174
$155,686
49
8
Park Ave N N 6th St to N 5th St
12" laterals
680
67,980
391
2
$61 797
$132 177
$122,402
402
9
N 10th St BOC to Park Ave N
New 18" & 12" laterals.
930
80,910
551
1
$73 551
$132 681
$122
656
10
N 10th St Park Ave N to Garden Ave N
New 18" & 12" laterals
.686
69,696
408
3
$54 175
$274 530
$247,255
11
N 10th St Garden Ave N to 1-405
New 18" & 12" laterals
1,016
88 305
601
4
$80 273
$406 678
$366,278
12
N 8th St BOC to Park Ave N
New 18" & 12'• laterals
1.080
108,000
588
1
$98 177
$436,217
$394,517
13
N 8th St Park Ave N to Garden Ave N
12" laterals
805
80,500
438
5
$73,178
52,018
$141 068
14
N 8th St Garden Ave N to 1-405
New 48" & 12" laterals
1,250
125,000
880
6
$113 631
$1 111 031
$1,037,781
15
N 6th St Cedar River to BOC
U size to 30"
1,280
160 000
768
$512 000
$467 200
16
N 6th St BOC to Park Ave N
U size to 301•
1, 050
87 200
622
$420 000
$383 250
17
Outfall #10 Qake WA to BOC
U size to 36"
1.800
-
Tn{al
A o Coe
eee n
$990,0001
$918,000
- ---- --�--- �o�
aI&0W,vuv 401,014.1Tu 55,969,770
• BOC III, Boulevard of Champions (Logan Ave)
•
Diameter (In.)
Cost w/
Restoration ($AfRestoration
Cost w/out
($/10
Assume ROW 90% Impervious, 10% landscaping.
12
180
155
• Assumed costs Include permitting, engineering, design, materials,
18
215
190
construction, and Inspection of pipe, cbs, backflll, etc.
"Asssume
24
250
220
full cross•secttons on all streets
30
400
365
36
550
510
48
700
855
Exhibit 7X
1. 5-200' STUBS FROM LOGAN
TO THE WEST
AT $20,000 EACH
TOTAL = $100,000
2100 LF OF 12"
$ 50 PE FOOT
TOT L — $125,000
R02-6
R02-7
243
{ R02-5
/ 3. 100 LF OF 12"
@ $250 PER FOOT
�°2-4 TOTAL = $250,000
EXISTING KING CO.
j 2-3 EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR
4. 1200 LF OF 12"
N
@ $250 PER FOOT
TOTAL = $300,000
122
146
123
16
5. 1300 L
EX. 8" W T
(AND Lot
@ $300
(EX. CONC.
TOTAL = $:
m
zo
20' 20'
226
194 0 8 5 176 171
6 Q270 02
23 279
2-1 0 31 m P o 271
�o
190 279 0 0 274 0 2
201 8'
TOTAL COST
-57 `R 1-3 A 202 2 1. WEST STUBS = 100,000
2. LOGAN/PARK CONNECTOR = 125,000
3. N. 10TH - LOGAN TO PARK = 250,000
4. N. 8TH - LOGAN TO PARK = 300,000
5. GARDEN REPLACEMENT = 390,000
Z I $1,165,000
1 OR $1.2 MILLION
PROPOSED BOEING CPA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
SEWER EXTENSIONS
EXHIBIT 8
EXHIBIT 9
ESTIMATED PLANNING LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS
For Selected APPlication as Development Occurs (2003 dollars)
.$.792,000 —
—
—
294.000 $638.000
4792,000 $792A00
. __..::.. —
0
$0 — —
$0 —
—
_
$200.000
$0 $200,000
$200,000 $200,000
$0 — _
—
$138,000
$138.000 $138.000
$o $918,000
_'
$o
$14,245,000 $13,255,000 $4,103,000
$550,000
51,385,000
$918,0$$0
$916,000
i19,zvj,uQ0I $33,538,000
NOTES: •UUiity segments may not exactly match roadway segments. Please see beck up sheet precise details. Private servioas are the responsibility ,
3 S es lanes
Option a uses existing esfrom Pei to OrrUaIf 13 on Johns Creek and therefore ponsibiliity of the developer.
3 lanes lanes from Logan and the 5 lanes hest Park and the ultimate _ requires maintaining erdsung encumbrances_ Additional Stomrxater costs may be necessary in District 1.
•••• Roadway assumed to transition back ton Avenue buldout. Park is then assumed to nanow down to ctnrent width after Garden.
original width al Houser Way. Therefore, no intersection costs estimated. — Not relevant to that phasing timeframe
District 1 is divided into two subdistricts. Within District 1, estimated Subdistrict 1A infrastructure costs are shaded. Subdistrict 1B costs are not shaded.
ILJ
I.___1
_ 2 4 i r---�_-• f� V t—
ir
0 OEID _ ir .0.
uj
i• / , \ 1 f _ eke ,P �' : � . • fl p ���o� �`�� � p� � v�
ttt .,•,� ��- , ::y�-•�--��, 1 1 a+���, ��_�=1 �� ,j �, � �I+,._1 � 1�ji�+� jjj'''���-r n
co
' 1-� 1 \ i J --_ ••• `,�li S Y r 1P�a ; '�I (f tt f=1 "1 :-41i l r._ !�f .F; I �^—
.b i s .. r i�e� �•< �` :9�_� `'✓{'}-]U„--ill�ir�t Ij:tt --•�� J�
.'9• ..iii}9:� �.J :zs :L`.s'��. �\,f-. - :f~� �JP{s .��li��i'r-�-.�'�1_ f.•�CJ�: u!��k� 'r .'Ik', � !� _
dr �°. .• ��br '•� Oct ~i-'-•- _ -' ��:.. -- - - - - �! ^- - --r`?, •1,� • _ iip` - '��_— -----
';ar_.-:�1:.. - � .� =`:'� •ate - _ - -- - -- -- ��:.. �: ' -. I: tiJ �-'--... - —= _- ----
•,,:.1:;: r.,✓1': _ �.-pj �-.—'.vr.:. �S'l �st'� :af•���..6��,_ w:s-TSS�._ a�:[i'i.;� _ -
c,��� PFt'3T.+r�.,�-;W,.
•" l
i•
3Aph!(
TYPICAL SECTION 1: PARK AVENUE NORTH
FROM PROPOSED LOOAN AVENUE TO NORTH 8TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE
8' 16, 32' PARTIAL. -BUIL.DOUT
SCALE: 1"=16' '(SAMEAS FULL B..UILDOUT)
NO
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE C17Y. OF
RENTON STREET STANDARD
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
EXHIBIT 10A
11 IN i
• COnsulting Englneers
101 Stewart Street, Sulte 800
Seattle. Wash/ngton 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206)! 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
u
TYPICAL -SECTInN 2: PARK AVENUE SO
FROM NORTH 8TH STREET TO NORTH 6TH STREET
4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING. LANE
a'
0 8' 16' 32'
SCALE: 1 "-16'
)UMNO PARK
MONT OF m
tr NEW
Mco�AN/
T�nemna &NE
Ebtt11N0 t0a' NEW
TO K RNEfO ROAOWAY AND
C MO7DRU�Ce
,c tr f2
1RAFAC MEDIAN 12
R1C 12'
LANE TURMNO LANE LANE. ?RAC
:ES WITH CRATES a.a'
TREES WITN CRATES
' RICNT OF WAY W10 TH
S
PARTIAL B•UI�LDOUT
CSAME AS PARTIAL
"BUILDOUT)
•
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE /LLUSTRAT/M
EXHIBIT 10B
m
0- wo Consulting Engineers
101 Stewart Street Suite 600
Seattle, Washington 98101
2206) 382-0600 Fax (206) 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
f
TYri-CAL SECTION 3: LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
EXHIBIT 10C
2'LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A TURNINGUNE
PARTIAL. BUILDOUT
'TO' SUPPORT SUBDISTRICT' I A'
0 80
SCALE: 1"-16#
SECTIONS ARE DRAM IN ACCORDANCE W17H THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS ANO THE CITY OF
PENTON STREET STANDARDS.
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUMATIVE
r?• Consulting Engineers
101 Stewart Street Sulte 800
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206).362-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
TYPICAL SECTION 5: NORTH 8TH S'
2 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE
PARTIAL BUILDOUT' "
TO SUPPORT SU
32, BDISTRICT lb
I NOON*
SCALE: 1 "= 16'
NO
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND ,THE CITY OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRA-
EXHIBIT 10D
Consulting Engineers
101 Stewart Street Sulte 800
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206) 382-0500
10 NOVE&SER 2003
f
TYPICAL SECTION 7: NORTH 10TH. STREET EXHIBIT 1OE Ir
2 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH -A MEDIAN/TURNINt6 LANE r I
PARTIAL .BUILDOUT
TO SUPPORT SUBDISTRICT. IA
0�28'
SCALE: 1 "-16'
NOTE:
SECTIONS ARE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF
RENTON STREET STANDARDS.
ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE
•
Consult/ng Engineers
101 Stewart Street, Suite 800
Seattle. Washington 98101
(206) 382-0600 Fax (206), 382-0500
10 NOVEMBER 2003
In
COOK
Emilia
Ell
Logan Ave. N.
P ro rk A
Gonjer, Ave. N
\A
�Aol
11/04/2004 10:10 5036661404 CENTER OAK PROPERTIS PAGE 02/17
Tbis Sketcb is furaitbed as a Courtesy only by First America
`fiUe lwuranee Company and It is J= a part of any title
Commitmcat or policy of title In urancc.
This sketch Is futniosed solely for the purpose of atalatinr in
toesti ltheprocWtesanddoesnotpurporttoshowaUhighwsys,
toads, or t uccoanta aRoeting the property. No rslimm should
be plaaod upon this sketch for the locadom or dimmslons of the
property and no liablUity is annmod for the eonectam thereof.
ORDER NO.
SUBDIVISION
RCDG NO./VOL & PCi.
OTR _ SEC TWNSHP - RNG
Q — n
11/04/2004 10:10 5036661404
CENTER OAK PROPERTIS
PAGE 03/17
EXHIBIT "C"
FOURTH
PLAT CERTIFICATE
TO: BOEING REALTY CORPORATION
2283 SOUTH EAST BLACK NUGGET ROAD
5TH FLLOR, M/C 7W-60
ISSAQUAH, WA 98027
ATTN: GENE WARDEN
CERTIFICATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PLAT
DEAR SIR:
ORDER NO. 72457T-T2
IN THE MATTER OF PLAT SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL. THIS COMPANY HAS EXAMINED
THE RECORDS OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR AND COUNTY CLERK OF KING COUNTY,
WASHTNGTON, AND THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK OF T14E UNITED STATES COURTS HOLDING
TERMS IN SAID COUNTY, AND FROM SUCH EXAMINATION HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE TITLE
TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND SITUATE IN SAID KING COUNTY, TO -WIT:
PARCEL A:
LOTS 1, 2.3 AND 4 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. LUA-01.056•SHPL, AS RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING NO. 20011205900004;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON. COUNTY OF KINQ, STATE OF WASHINGTON,
11/04/2004 10:10 5036661404 CENTER OAK PROPERTIS PAGE 04/17
ORDER NO. 72457T-T2
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST
W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON
BELT LINE) RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LYING WESTERLY OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD S.E.);
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SAID SECTION, DESCRIBED AS
.FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE• SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF niE ABANDONED
BURLINGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON BELT LINE) RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD S.E.);
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN 60 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO 10 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF PARK AVF,NUE (LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD S.E.);
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT;
THENCE WESTERLY TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RAILROAD MARGIN;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR SR 405 BY KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE NO. 656127;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR WIDENING OF
PARK AVENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9703181422.
PARCEL C:
THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON NORTIKCRN INC-IS 100 FOOT RIGfIT OF WAY FOR ITS BELT
LINE IN GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 1
AND 2 IN SECTION 7, SAID TOWNSHIP AN RANGE, BEI VP.EN A WEST PRODUCTION OF T -JE
NORTH LINE OF 6TH AVENUE NORTH AND A LINE EXTENDING SOUTHEASTERLY AND
RADIALLY TO THE MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE AS NOW CONSTRUCTED FROM SURVEY STATION
1068.00 IN SAID CENTER LINE (DISTANT 40.8 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID
MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY END OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN
INC.'S BRIDGE NO. 3) AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
P3gc 2
11/04/2004 10:10
5036661404
CENTER OAK HRUNt_k 115
HAUL Ub/ 1 /
r w'
ORDER NO. 72457T-T2
BEGINNING AT A POINT 25 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED RADIALLY AND AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF TRACK AS NOW CONSTRUCTED, FROM SURVEY STATION
1068+00.
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT 25 FEET NORTHWESTERLY,
MEASURED FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AT SURVEY STATION 1074+00;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY AT AN ANGEL TO THE RIGHT TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OF BURLiNGTON NORTHERN INC.
AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF SPUR TRACK HEADBLOCK STATION 8+85,5 THE END OF DESCRIBED
LINE AND END OF DESCRIPTION.
PARCEL D
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., WHICH LIES NORTH OF
THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6TH STREET AND BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE
CENTERLINES OF PELLY AVENUE NORTH AND MAN STREET, NOW WELLS STREET NORTH;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEEDS RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING NOS. 7108190352 AND 8509130916
PARCEL E
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TTIE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH
THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PARK AVENUE, AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT
OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED N VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE. 97, RECORDS
OF KING COUNTY;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PRODUCTION, TO A POINT 715 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SUBD.NISION;
THENCE W$ST PARALLEL WMJ AND DISTANT 715 FEET NORTH FROM SAID SOUTH LINE TO
THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF PELLY STREET;
SAID SUBDNISION;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PRODUCED CENTERLINE, TO THE NORTH OF SOUTH 660 FEET OF
THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE CENTER
LINE OF MAIN STREET, NOW WELLS AVENUE NORTH, AS SHOWN N THE PLAT OF RENTON
FARM PLAT NO. 2, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME I OF PLATS, PAGE 32, RECORDS OF
LUNG COUNTY;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PRODUCTION TO THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6TH STREET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LNF, OF NORTH 6TH STREET TO THE EASTERLY
MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDMSION;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR THE WIDENING OF NORTH
6TH STREET BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS, 7106110508, 7106110510, 7106110511,
8509100968,8509130916 AND 8509130917;
Pagc 3